In their book The Healing Planet - Strategies For Resolving The
Environmental Crisis, Paul and Anne Ehrlich write:

"In this century, humanity has become a truly planetary ecological
force, its effects going far beyond the transformation of the
landscape to include altering the composition of the atmosphere
globally, interfering with planetary nutrient cycles, modifying
climate, and exterminating other life forms. In historical
perspective, the switch - from a modest to an overwhelming scale of
impact, and from a positive to a negative impact on carrying
capacity - was almost instantaneous and monumental: human activities
now appear to be lowering the long-term carrying capacity and
incurring risks on a scale unimaginable less than a lifetime ago."

And, also, later in the book:

"Controlling population growth is
critical. We cannot emphasize too strongly that significant
resources must be directed into programs that limit population
growth both in the United States and abroad.

Because of the built-in
time lags, unless the surge in human numbers is halted soon and a
gradual population shrinkage begun, there is no hope of solving the
problems discussed in this volume."

From the environmental impact side of the discussion, the
Ehrlichs
write:

Measured by commercial energy use, each American, on average, causes
some 70 times as much environmental damage as a Ugandan or Laotian,
20 times that of an Indian, 10 times that of a Chinese, and roughly
twice that of citizens of Japan, the United Kingdom, France, Sweden,
or Australia.

Americans use about 50 percent more commercial energy
than Soviet citizens, (who nonetheless have caused even more havoc
by using it with minimum efficiency and virtually no effort to
prevent environmental damage). In terms of per-capita energy use,
only Canada, Luxembourg, and a few oil producers are really in our
league.

Viewed in this light, the United States is
the world’s most
overpopulated nation. It is the world’s fourth largest nation in
population, now numbering more than a quarter-billion people, and
the average American consumes more of Earth’s riches than an average
citizen of any of the other "big ten" nations ...

Because of this
combination of a huge population, great affluence, and damaging
technologies, the United States has the largest impact of any nation
on Earth’s fragile environment and limited resources.

In September 1991, as a preliminary to the United Nations "Earth
Summit" Conference held in Brazil in 1992, the United Nations
Associations of the United States, Canada, and Iowa sponsored a
Midwest Public Hearing in Des Moines, Iowa.

At the Iowa Hearing,
held in co-operation with the Secretariat of the U.N. Conference in
Brazil, a rather startling document was circulated privately to some
of the officials.

It reveals U.N. thinking on world population.

The time is pressing.
The Club of Rome was founded in 1968,
Limited To Growth was written in 1979, but insufficient progress has
been made in population reduction.

Given global instabilities, including those in the former Soviet
bloc, the need for firm control of world technology, weaponry, and
natural resources is now absolutely mandatory. The immediate
reduction of world population, according to the mid-1970s
recommendations of the Draper Fund, must be immediately effected.

The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the
world-carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in
the birth rate due to contraception, sterilization, abortion, but
must be met in the present by the reduction in the numbers presently
existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary.

The issue is falsely debated between a political and a cultural
approach to population and resources, when in fact, faced with
stubborn obstruction and day-to-day political expediency which make
most of the leaders of the most populous poor countries unreliable,
the issue is compulsory cooperation.

Compulsory cooperation is not debatable with 166 nations, most of
whose leaders are irresolute, conditioned by localist cultures, and
lacking appropriate notions of the
New World Order. Debate means
delay and forfeiture of our goals and purpose.

This same document directs that the following policy must be
implemented:

The Security Council of the United Nations, led by the
Anglo-Saxon Major Nation powers, will decree that henceforth the
Security Council will inform all nations that its sufferance on
population has ended, that all nations have quotas for reduction on
a yearly basis, which will be enforced by the Security Council by
selective or total embargo of credit items of trade including food
and medicine, or by military force, when required.

The
Security Council of the U.N. will inform all nations that
outmoded notions of all national sovereignty will be discarded and
that the Security Council has complete legal, military, and economic
jurisdiction in any region in the world and that this will be
enforced by the Major Nations of the Security Council.

The Security Council of the U.N. will take possession of all
natural resources, including the watersheds and great forests, to be
used and preserved for the good of the Major Nations of the Security
Council.

The Security Council of the U.N. will explain that not all races
and peoples are equal, nor should they be. [Sounds remarkably
similar to George Orwell’s Animal Farm.] Those races proven superior
by superior achievements ought to rule the lesser races, caring for
them on sufferance that they cooperate with the Security Council.
Decision making, including banking, trade, currency rates, and
economic development plans, will be made in stewardship by the Major
Nations.

All of the above constitute the New World Order, in which Order,
all nations, regions and races will cooperate with the decisions of
the Major Nations of the Security council.

The purpose of this document is to demonstrate that action delayed
could well be fatal. All could be lost if mere opposition by minor
races is tolerated and the unfortunate vacillations of our closest
comrades is cause for our hesitations. Open declaration of intent
followed by decisive force is the final solution.

This must be done
before any shock hits our financial markets, tarnishing our
credibility and perhaps diminishing our force.

On December 22, 1989, Resolution 44/228 titled United Nations
Conference On Environment and Development, was adopted without a
vote. This resolution called for the Earth Summit which was held in
Brazil in 1992, and called for Earth Day on June 5, 1992.

[Note - I realize that most "resolutions" are pretty
dry reading. Not so in this case - well, maybe a little. Read along
and be surprised at the broad, sweeping impact this has on everyone.
Due to the importance and scope of the resolution, I’ve decided to
include most of the document here.]:

Recalling its resolution 43/196 of 20 Dec. 1988 on a United Nations
conference on environment and development,

Taking note of decision 15/3 of 25 May 1989 of the Governing Council
of the United Nations Environment Program 161/[A/44/25] on a United
Nations conference on environment and development,

Taking note also of Economic and Social Council resolution 1989/87
of 26 July 1989 on the convening of a United Nations conference on
environment and development,

Taking note of Economic and Social Council resolution 1989/101 July
1989 entitled "Strengthening international co-operation on
environment: provision of additional financial resources to
developing countries",

Recalling also General Assembly resolution 42/186 of 11 Dec. 1987 on
the Environmental Perspective of the Year 2000 and Beyond, and
resolution 42/187 of 11 Dec. 1987 on the report of the World
Commission on Environment and Development, 162/[A/42/427],

Taking note of the report of the Secretary-General on the question
of the convening of a United Nations conference on environment and
development, 163/[A/44/256/1989/66],

Mindful of the views expressed by Governments in the plenary debate
held at its forty-fourth session on the convening of a United
Nations conference on environment and development,

Recalling the Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the
Human Environment. 164/,

Deeply concerned by the continuing deterioration of the state of the
environment and the serious degradation of the global life-support
systems, as well as by trends that, if allowed to continue, could
disrupt the global ecological balance, jeopardize the
life-sustaining qualities of the Earth and lead to an ecological
catastrophe, and recognizing that decisive, urgent and global action
is vital to protecting the ecological balance of the Earth,

Recognizing the importance for all countries of the protection and
enhancement of the environment,

Recognizing also that the global character of environmental
problems, including climate change, depletion of the ozone layer,
transboundary air and water pollution, the contamination of the
oceans and seas and degradation of land resources, including drought
and desertification requires actions at all levels, including the
global, regional and national levels and involving the commitment
and participation of all countries,

Gravely concerned that the major cause of the continuing
deterioration of the global environment is the unsustainable pattern
of production and consumption, particularly in industrialized
countries,

Stressing that poverty and environmental degradation are closely
interrelated and that environmental protection in developing
countries must, in this context, be viewed as an integral part of
the development process and cannot be considered in isolation from
it,

Recognizing that measures to be undertaken at the international
level for the protection and enhancement of the environment must
take fully into account the current imbalances in global patterns of
production and consumption,

Affirming that the responsibility for containing, reducing and
eliminating global environmental damage must be borne by the
countries causing such damage, must be in relation to the damage
caused and must be in accordance with their respective capabilities
and responsibilities, [based on Ehrlich’s statement above, this
sounds a lot like America will pay for it]

Recognizing the environmental impact of material remnants of war and
the need for further international co-operation for their removal,

Stressing the importance for all countries to take effective
measures for the protection, restoration and enhancement of the
environment in accordance, inter alia, with their respective
capabilities, while at the same time acknowledging the efforts being
made in all countries in this regard, including international
co-operation between developed and developing countries,

Stressing the need for effective international co-operation in the
area of research, development and application of environmentally
sound technologies,

Conscious of the crucial role of science and technology in the field
of environmental protection and of the need of developing countries,
in particular, concerning favorable access to environmentally sound
technologies, processes, equipment and related research and
expertise through international co-operation designed to further
global efforts for environmental protection, including the use of
innovative and effective means,

Recognizing that new and additional financial resources will have to
be channeled to developing countries in order to ensure their full
participation in global efforts for environmental protection,

Decides to convene a United National Conference on Environment
and Development of two weeks’ duration and at the highest possible
level of participation to coincide with World Environment Day, 5
June 1992;

Accepts with deep appreciation the generous offer of the
Government of Brazil to host the Conference;

Affirms that the Conference should elaborate strategies and
measures to halt and reverse the effects of environmental
degradation in the context of strengthened national and
international efforts to promote sustainable and environmentally
sound development in all countries;

Affirms that the protection and enhancement of the environment
are major issues that affect the well-being of peoples and economic
development throughout the world;

Also affirms that the promotion of economic growth in developing
countries is essential to address problems of environmental
degradation;

Further affirms the importance of a supportive international
economic environment that would result in sustained economic growth
and development in all countries for protection and sound management
of the environment;

Reaffirms that States have, in accordance with the Charter of the
United Nations and the applicable principles of international law,
the sovereign right to exploit their own resources pursuant to their
environmental policies, and also reaffirms their responsibility to
ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not
cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond
the limits of national jurisdiction and the need for States to play
their due role in preserving and protecting the global and regional
environment in accordance with their capacities and specific
responsibilities;

Affirms the responsibility of States for the damage to the
environment and natural resources caused by activities within their
jurisdiction or control through transboundary interference, in
accordance with national legislation and applicable international
law;

Notes that the largest part of the current emission of pollutants
into the environment, including toxic and hazardous wastes,
originates in developed countries, and therefore recognizes that
those countries have the main responsibility for combating such
pollution;

Stresses that large industrial enterprises, including
transnational corporations, are frequently the repositories of
scarce technical skills for the preservation and enhancement of the
environment, conduct activities in sectors that have an impact on
the environment and, to that extent, have specific responsibilities
and that, in this context, efforts need to be encouraged and
mobilized to protect and enhance the environment in all countries;

Reaffirms that the serious external indebtedness of developing
countries, and other countries with serious debt-servicing problems,
has to be addressed efficiently and urgently in order to enable
those countries to contribute fully and in accordance with their
capacities and responsibilities to global efforts to protect and
enhance the environment;

Affirms that in the light of the above, the following
environmental issues, which are not listed in any particular order
of priority, are among those of major concern in maintaining the
quality of the Earth’s environment and especially in achieving
environmentally sound and sustainable development in all countries:

Protection of the atmosphere by combating climate change,
depletion of the ozone layer and transboundary air pollution

Protection of the quality
and supply of freshwater resources

Protection of the oceans and
all kinds of seas, including enclosed and semi-enclosed
seas, and of coastal areas and the protection, rational
use and development of their living resources

Environmentally sound
management of wastes, particularly hazardous wastes, and
of toxic chemicals, as well as prevention of illegal
international traffic in toxic and dangerous products
and wastes

Improvement of the living
and working environment of the poor in urban slums and
rural areas, through eradicating poverty, inter alia by
implementing integrated rural and urban development
programs, as well as taking other appropriate measures
at all levels necessary to stem the degradation of the
environment

Protection of human health conditions and improvement of the
quality of life

Emphasizes the need for strengthening international co-operation
for the management of the environment to ensure its protection and
enhancement and the need to explore the issue of benefits derived
from activities, including research and development, related to the
protection and development of biological diversity;

Reaffirms the need to strengthen international co-operation,
particularly between developed and developing countries, in research
and development and the utilization of environmentally sound
technologies;

Decides that the Conference, in addressing environmental issues
in the development context, should have the following objectives:

To examine the state of the
environment and changes that have occurred since the
1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment
and since the adoption of such international agreements
as the Plan of Action to Combat Desertification,
165/[1977-A/Conf. 74/36] the Vienna Convention for the
Protection of the Ozone Layer, adopted on 22 March 1985,
and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the
Ozone Layer, adopted on 16 September 1987, taking into
account the actions taken by all countries and
intergovernmental organizations to protect and enhance
the environment

To identify strategies to be
coordinated regionally and globally, as appropriate, for
concerted action to deal with major environmental issues
in the socio-economic development processes of all
countries within a particular time-frame

To recommend measures to be taken at the national and
international levels to protect and enhance the environment, taking
into account the specific needs of developing countries, through the
development and implementation of policies for sustainable and
environmentally sound development with special emphasis on
incorporating environmental concerns in the economic and social
development process, and of various sectorial policies and through,
inter alia, preventive action at the sources of
environmental degradation, clearly identifying the
sources of such degradation and appropriate remedial
measures, in all countries

To promote the further
development of international environmental law, taking
into account the Declaration of the United Nations
Conference on Human Environment, 166/ [U.N. pub. sales
no. E.73.II.A.14] as well as the special needs and
concerns of the developing countries, and to examine, in
this context, the feasibility of elaborating general
rights and obligations of States, as appropriate, in the
field of the environment, also taking into account
relevant existing international legal instruments

To examine ways and means
further to improve co-operation in the field of
protection and enhancement of the environment between
neighboring countries with a view to eliminating adverse
environmental effects

To examine strategies for
national and international action with a view to
arriving at specific agreements and commitments by
Governments for defined activities to deal with major
environmental issues, in order to restore the global
ecological balance and to prevent further deterioration
of the environment, taking into account the fact that
the largest part of the current emission of pollutants
into the environment, including toxic and hazardous
wastes originates in developed countries, and therefore
recognizing that those countries have the main
responsibility for combating such pollution

To accord high priority to
drought and desertification control and to consider all
means necessary, including financial, scientific and
technological resources, to halt and reverse the process
of desertification with a view to preserving the
ecological balance of the planet

To examine the relationship
between environmental degradation and the structure of
the international economic environment, with a view to
ensuring a more integrated approach to
environment-and-development problems in relevant
international forums without introducing new forms of
conditionality

To examine strategies for
national and international action with a view to
arriving at specific agreements and commitments by
Governments and by intergovernmental organizations for
defined activities to promote a supportive international
economic environment that would result in sustained and
environmentally sound development in all countries, with
a view to combating poverty and improving the quality of
life, and bearing in mind that the incorporation of
environmental concerns and considerations in development
planning and policies should not be used to introduce
new forms of conditionality in aid or in development
financing and should not serve as a pretext for creating
unjustified barriers to trade

To identify ways and means
to provide new and additional financial resources,
particularly to developing countries, for
environmentally sound development programs and projects
in accordance with national development objectives,
priorities and plans and to consider ways of
establishing effective monitoring of the implementation
of the provision of such new and additional financial
resources, particularly to developing countries, so as
to enable the international community to take further
appropriate action on the basis of accurate and reliable
data

To identify ways and means
to provide additional financial resources for measures
directed towards solving major environmental problems of
global concern and especially to support those
countries, in particular developing countries, for whom
the implementation of such measures would entail a
special or abnormal burden, in particular owing to their
lack of financial resources, expertise or technical
capacity

To consider various funding
mechanisms, in eluding voluntary ones, and to examine
the possibility of a special international fund and
other innovative approaches, with a view to ensuring the
carrying out, on a favorable basis, of the most
effective and expeditious transfer of environmentally
sound technologies to developing countries

To examine with the view to recommending effective modalities
for favorable access to, and transfer of, environmentally sound
technologies, in particular to the developing countries, including
on concessional and preferential terms, and for supporting all
countries in their efforts to create and develop their
endogenous technological capacities in scientific
research and development, as well as in the acquisition
of relevant information, and, in this context, to
explore the concept of assured access for developing
countries to environmentally sound technologies in its
relation to proprietary rights with a view to developing
effective responses to the needs of developing countries
in this area

To promote the development
of human resources, particularly in developing
countries, for the protection and enhancement of the
environment

To recommend measures to
Governments and the relevant bodies of the United
Nations system, with a view to strengthening technical
co-operation with the developing countries to enable
them to develop and strengthen their capacity for
identifying, analyzing, monitoring, managing or
preventing environmental problems in accordance with
their national development plans, objectives and
priorities

To promote open and timely
exchange of information on national environmental
policies, situations and accidents

To review and examine the
role of the United Nations system in dealing with the
environment and possible ways of improving it

To promote the development
or strengthening of appropriate institutions at the
national, regional and global levels to address
environmental matters in the context of the
socio-economic development processes of all countries

To promote environmental
education, especially of the younger generation, as well
as other measures to increase awareness of the value of
the environment

To promote international
co-operation within the United Nations system in
monitoring, assessing and anticipating environmental
threats and in rendering assistance in cases of
environmental emergency

o specify the respective
responsibilities of and support to be given by the
organs, organizations and programs of the United Nations
system for the implementation of the conclusion of the
Conference

To quantify the financial
requirements for the successful implementation of
Conference decisions and recommendations and to identify
possible sources, including innovative ones, of
additional resources

To assess the capacity of the United Nations system to assist in
the prevention and settlement of disputes in the environmental
sphere and to recommend measures in this field, while respecting
existing bilateral and international agreements that provide for the
settlement of such disputes.

Section II, the final section of the resolution, goes on to outline
the specific logistics from Committees to participants and ways to
co-ordinate the Conference and future actions.

Adopted at the
Earth Summit in Brazil [1992] by nations representing over 98% of
the Earth’s population, it is the principal global plan to confront
and overcome the economic and ecological problems of the late 20th
century. It provides a comprehensive blueprint for humanity to use
to forge its way into the next century by proceeding more gently
upon the Earth.

As its sweeping programs are implemented world-wide,
it will eventually impact on every human activity on our planet.
Deep and dramatic changes in human society are proposed by this
monumental historic agreement. Understanding those changes is
essential to guide us all into the future on our fragile planet.

Humanity is at a crossroads of enormous consequence. Never before
has civilization faced an array of problems as critical as the ones
now faced. As forbidding and portentous as it may sound, what is at
stake is nothing less than the global survival of human kind.

The effects of human impact upon the Earth have been accelerating at
a rate unforeseen even a handful of decades ago. Where once nature
seemed forever the dominant force on Earth, evidence is rapidly
accumulating that human influence over nature has reached a point
where natural forces may soon be overwhelmed.

Only very recently
have the citizens of Earth begun to appreciate the depth of the
potential danger of human impact on our planet. The equilibrium of
the planet is in jeopardy, as judged by forces as profound as the
global climate and the atmospheric protection from the Sun’s
damaging rays. Major changes in the ecological balance of the world
are occurring very rapidly, more rapidly in many cases than
humanity’s ability to assess the dangers.

We need
the bounty of nature to survive on this planet. We need the fresh
air to breathe, the clean water to drink, the fertile soil to
provide our sustenance. Human impact upon these vital substances has
reached the point of causing potentially irreversible damage.
Scientists around the world, in every country on Earth, are
documenting the hazards of ignoring our dependence upon the natural
world.

There is strong evidence from the world’s scientific community that
humanity is very, very close to crossing certain ecological
thresholds for the support of life on Earth. The Earth’s ozone
layer, our only protection from the harmful rays of the Sun is being
depleted. Massive erosion is causing a rapid loss in the fertile
soil of our planet and with it a potentially drastic drop in the
ability to produce food for the world’s people.

Vast destruction of
the world’s forests is contributing to the spread of the world’s
deserts, increasing the loss of bio-diversity and hampering the
ability of the Earth’s atmosphere to cleanse itself. The planet’s
vast oceans are losing their animal life at a staggering rate and
are fast reaching the limit of their ability to absorb humanity’s
waste.

The land animals and plants of our planet are experiencing a
rate of extinction unseen on Earth since the time of the dinosaurs;
extinctions brought on not by cataclysmic events of nature but by
the impact of a single species: homo-sapiens. The increasing
pollution of air, water and land by hazardous and toxic waste is
causing wide-spread health problems that are only now beginning to
be understood.

All of these problems are being intensified by the
explosive growth in the sheer numbers of human beings in the last
half of the 20th century.

For the first time in history, humanity must face the risk of
unintentionally destroying the foundation of life on Earth. The
global scientific consensus is that if the current levels of
environmental deterioration continue, the delicate life-sustaining
qualities of this planet will collapse. It is a stark and
frightening potential.

To prevent such a collapse is an awesome
challenge for the global Community.

[Continuing to quote portions of
Agenda 21:]

In December of 1989, the General Assembly of
the United Nations
confronted this daunting task.

The urgency of the problems of
development and environment prompted the nations of the world to
call for an unprecedented meeting - a meeting of all of the nations
on Earth - an Earth summit. The United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development was set for June of 1992 in Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil.

The scope of attendance at this historic meeting clearly defines the
importance of its task. It was, very simply, the largest gathering
of heads of state in the history of life on Earth. On June 13, 1992,
nearly 100 world leaders met around a single table in Rio de Janeiro
in the largest face-to-face meeting of national leaders in the
history of international diplomacy.

Agenda 21 is not a static document. It is a plan of action. It is
meant to be a hands-on instrument to guide the development of the
Earth in a sustainable manner. Recognizing the global nature of the
environmental problems that face humanity, it is based on the
premise that sustainable development of the Earth is not simply an
option: it is a requirement - a requirement increasingly imposed by
the limits of nature to absorb the punishment which humanity has
inflicted upon it.

Agenda 21 is also based on the premise that
sustainable development of the Earth is entirely feasible. The
transition to a global civilization in balance with nature will be
an exceedingly difficult task, but Agenda 21 is the collective
global alert that there is no alternative.

We must align human
civilization with the natural equilibrium of our planet and we must
do so very rapidly if we are to prevent an irreversible decline in
the quality of life on Earth.

The bold goal of Agenda 21 is to halt and reverse the environmental
damage to our planet and to promote environmentally sound and
sustainable development in all countries on Earth. It is a blueprint
for action in all areas relating to the sustainable development of
our planet into the 21st century. It calls for specific changes in
the activities of all people.

It includes concrete measures and
incentives to reduce the environmental impact of the industrialized
nations, revitalize development in developing nations, eliminate
poverty world-wide and stabilize the level of human population.

Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound
reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has
ever experienced - a major shift in the priorities of both
governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of
human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern
for the environmental consequences of every human action be
integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every
level.

The successful implementation of the far-ranging actions proposed by
Agenda 21 will require active participation by people throughout the
world, at the local, national and global levels. There are measures
that are directed at all levels of society - from international
bodies such as the United Nations and the World Bank to local groups
and individuals.

There are specific actions which are intended to be
undertaken by multinational corporations and entrepreneurs, by
financial institutions and individual investors, by high tech
companies and indigenous people, by workers and labor unions, by
farmers and consumers, by students and schools, by governments and
legislators, by scientists, by women, by children - in short, by
every person on Earth.

The overall levels and patterns of human consumption and production
must be compatible with the finite capacities of the Earth.

As the
human population on Earth increases, there will be ever greater
pressure for people throughout the world to attain a higher standard
of living. If the model lifestyle for this increasing populace is
based on the current excessive consumption levels and inefficient
production methods of the industrialized countries, the thresholds
of economic and environmental disaster will soon be reached.

Sustainable patterns of consumption and efficient methods of
production must be developed and encouraged in all societies.

One of the most important root causes of the intensifying human
impact on our planet is the unprecedented growth in the sheer
numbers of human beings in the last 50 years. The world’s population
is now growing by nearly 100 million people every year. Population
pressures are placing increasing stress on the ecological systems of
the planet.

All countries must improve their ability to assess the
environmental impact of their population growth rates and develop
and implement appropriate policies to stabilize populations.

[Still quoting from Agenda 21, under the heading
Controlling
Population Growth, we read:]

The spiraling growth of world population fuels the growth of global
production and consumption.

Rapidly increasing demands for natural
resources, employment, education and social services make any
attempts to protect natural resources and improve living standards
very difficult. There is an immediate need to develop strategies
aimed at controlling world population growth.

There is an urgent
demand to increase awareness among decision-makers of the critical
role that population plays in environmental protection and
development issues.

[Then, under National Population Policies, we find:]

Existing plans for sustainable development have generally recognized
that population is a vital factor which influences consumption
patterns, production, lifestyles and long-term sustainability.

Far
more attention, however, must be given to the issue of population in
general policy formulation and the design of global development
plans. All nations of the world have to improve their capacities to
assess the implications of their population patterns. The long term
consequences of human population growth must be fully grasped by all
nations.

They must rapidly formulate and implement appropriate
programs to cope with the inevitable increase in population numbers.
At the same time, measures must be incorporated to bring about the
stabilization of human population.

The full consequences of
population growth must be understood and taken into account at all
levels of decision-making.

[Agenda 21 ends with:]

In the next few years, the basic tenets of
Agenda 21 will begin to
influence decision-making at every level of society.

A deep
understanding of the rationale behind the drive for sustainable
global development will enable every person to contribute to the
success of Agenda 21 programs.

For the far-ranging programs of
Agenda 21 to be successful, a concern for the environment must begin
to be integrated into every human action and every personal
decision.

What we manufacture

What we buy

What we wear

How we
travel

What we eat

Who we choose as leaders,

...these and a myriad of
other daily questions must begin to be answered with a recognition
that every single human action has an impact upon both the
environment and upon all other people.

Humanity has reached the
point in its history when it must begin the difficult and demanding
task of taking responsibility for each and every one of its actions.

The sheer numbers of human beings are now causing our collective
actions to have an unprecedented effect upon the planet.

As humanity approaches the end of this century, it is poised at a
crossroads of unmatched magnitude. The very existence of human life
on Earth may well depend upon the direction which is taken in the
next few years. Without question, the character and quality of human
life on this planet is at stake.

The potential for catastrophe is
huge. However, the possibilities for success are encouraging. Agenda
21 is itself a monument to the ability of humanity to join together
in a global effort to solve the major problems of civilization. We
each now have the opportunity and responsibility to help shape the
future of life on our fragile planet.

In his book Vaccines: Are They Really Safe And Effective?, Neil
Miller (National Vaccine Information Center) writes:

A brief review of the data presented in this book indicates that:

Many of
the vaccines were not the
true cause of a decline in the incidence of the disease.
Increased nutritional and sanitary measures probably deserve
credit. Some diseases may also have their own evolutionary
cycles; the virulent nature of the virgin disease is
transformed into a tame illness as members of the population
are exposed to it and gain "herd" immunity

None of the vaccines can confer genuine immunity. Often the
opposite is true; the vaccine increases the chance of contracting
the disease. (Published "vaccine efficacy rates" are misleading.
They are often evaluated by measuring blood antibody levels - not by
comparing infection rates in vaccinated and unvaccinated persons.)

All of the vaccines can produce
side-effects. Reactions range from soreness at the injection
site to brain damage and death

The long-term effects of all vaccines are unknown. Particularly
distressing are the implications that vaccines can be devastating to
the young child’s immature immune system. Studies were presented
showing impaired health protection following injections. Lowered
physical defenses may be responsible for a new breed of autoimmune
diseases. Other studies showed damage to the brain and nervous
system following shots - post-vaccinal encephalitis. This, in turn,
causes large numbers of children to grow up with physical,
mental and emotional disabilities of varying degrees. All of
these conditions affect the individual, his or her family,
and society as well

Several of the vaccines can be especially dangerous.
Nevertheless, the Medical-lndustrial Complex continues to maintain
its deceptive practice of disregarding vaccine reactions. In fact,
medical officials recently suggested that they were justified in
administering new and unproven vaccines by claiming it is unethical
to withhold them! Meanwhile, creative propaganda on the merits of
vaccinations remains a lucrative ploy. For example, the AMA admits
that "adult vaccines need a gimmick." CDC physicians suggest a
catchy slogan, like "Vaccines are not just kid stuff." Our
policy-makers have lobbied for laws against freedom of choice. Their
patterns of coercion and denial are notorious among the enlightened
members of the population (parents who question vaccines), though
sadly their awakenings may have cost them dearly - often the life or
health of their own child.

One of the few doctors who has dared to speak out against the
Medical Monopoly, Dr. Robert S. Mendelsohn, dramatized his stand
against Modern Medicine by defining it as a Church which has Four
Holy Waters.

The first of these, he listed as Vaccination. Dr Mendelsohn termed vaccination "of questionable safety." However,
other doctors have been more explicit. It is notable that the
Rockefeller interests have fought throughout the nineteenth century
to make these Four Holy Waters compulsory throughout the United
States, ignoring all the protests and warnings of their dangers.

Of these four items, which might well be termed the Four Horsemen of
the Apocalypse, because they too are known to bring death and
destruction in their wake, the most pernicious in its long-term
effects may well be the practice of immunization. This practice goes
directly against the discovery of modern holistic medical experts
that the body has a natural immune defense against illness.

The
Church of Modern Medicine claims that we can only be absolved from
the peril of infection by the Holy Water of vaccination, injecting
into the system a foreign body of infection, which will then perform
a Medical Miracle, and will confer life-long immunity, hence the
term, "immunization."

The greatest heresy any physician can commit
is to voice publicly any doubt of any one of the Four Holy Waters,
but the most deeply entrenched in modern medical practice is
undoubtedly the numerous vaccination programs. They are also the
most consistently profitable operations of the Medical Monopoly.

"My honest opinion is that vaccine is the cause of
more disease and suffering than anything I could name. I believe
that such diseases as cancer, syphilis, cold sores and many other
disease conditions are the direct results of vaccination.

Yet, in
the state of Virginia, and in many other states, parents are
compelled to submit their children to this procedure while the
medical profession not only receives its pay for this service, but
also makes splendid and prospective patients for the future."

From London comes an alarming observation from a practitioner of
excellent reputation and long experience.

"in
recent years many men and women in the prime of life have dropped
dead suddenly, often after attending a feast or a banquet. I am
convinced that some eighty percent of these deaths are caused by the
inoculation or vaccination they have undergone.

They are well known
to cause grave and permanent disease of the heart. The coroner
always hushes it up as "natural causes".

You cannot find any such warning in any medical textbook or popular
book on health. In fact, this writer was able to locate it in a
small volume buried deep in the stacks in the Library of Congress.

Yet such an ominous observation from an established medical
practitioner should be as widely circulated as possible, if only to
be attacked by those who can refute its premise. At least it cannot
be attacked by the Establishment as quackery, because Dr. Snow is
not attempting to sell some substitute for vaccination, but merely
warning of its dangers.

Another practitioner, Dr.
W.B. Clarke of Indiana, finds that

"Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with
cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with at
least two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer
in an unvaccinated person."

At last, we have the breakthrough for which the American Cancer
Society has been searching, at such great expense, and for so many
years. Dr. Clarke has never seen a case of cancer in an unvaccinated
person. Is not this a lead which should be explored?

In the land where freedom rings, or is supposed to ring, it is even
more surprising to find that every citizen is compelled to submit to
a compulsory vaccination ritual. Here again, we are speaking of a
civilization which is now being visited by two plagues, the plague
of cancer and the plague of AIDS, yet compulsory vaccination offers
no protection against the plagues which threaten us. It is good-bye
whooping cough, good-bye diphtheria and hello AIDS.

The Medical
Monopoly is searching desperately for some type of "immunization"
against these plagues, and no doubt will eventually come up with
some type of "vaccine" which will be more dreadful than the disease.

From the outset, our most distinguished medical experts have proudly
informed us that AIDS is incurable, which is hardly the approach we
expect from those who demand that we accept their infallibility in
all things to do with medicine.

Another well known medical practitioner, Dr.
J.M. Peebles of San
Francisco, has written a book on vaccine, in which he says,

"The
vaccination practice, pushed to the front on all occasions by the
medical profession through political connivance made compulsory by
the state, has not only become the chief menace and the greatest
danger to the health of the rising generation, but likewise the
crowning outrage upon the personal liberties of the American
citizen; compulsory vaccination, poisoning the crimson currents of
the human system with brute-extracted lymph under the strange
infatuation that it would prevent smallpox, was one of the darkest
blots that disfigured the last century."

Dr. Peebles refers to the fact that cowpox vaccine was one of the
more peculiar "inventions or discoveries of the Age of
Enlightenment."

However, as I have pointed out in The Curse Of
Canaan, the 'Age of Enlightenment' was merely the latest program of
the Cult of Baal and its rituals of child sacrifice, which, in one
guise or another, has now been with us for some five thousand years.
Because of this goal, the Medical Monopoly is also known as "The
Society for Crippling Children."

Perhaps the most telling comment of
Dr. Peebles’ criticism is his
reference to "brute-extracted lymph." Could there be some connection
between the injection of this substance and the spread of a hitherto
unknown form of cancer, cancer of the lymph glands?

This type of
cancer is not only one of the most commonly encountered versions of
this disease; it is also one of the most difficult to treat, because
it rapidly spreads throughout the entire system. A diagnosis of
cancer of the lymph glands now means a virtual death sentence.

In an article in Science, March 4, 1977, Jonas and Darrell Salk warn
that,

"Live virus vaccines against influenza or poliomyelitis may in
each instance produce the disease it intended to prevent ... the
live virus against measles and mumps may produce such side effects
as encephalitis (brain damage)."

If vaccines present such a clear and present danger in children who
are forced to submit to them, we must examine the forces which
demand that they submit.

In the United States, vaccines are actively
and incessantly promoted as the solution for all infectious diseases
by such government agencies as the Centers for Disease Control in
Georgia, by HEW, USPHS, FDA, AMA and WHO.

It is of more than passing
interest that the federal agencies should be such passionate
supporters of compulsory use of vaccines, and that they also should
go through the "revolving door" to the big drug firms whose products
they have so assiduously promoted, throughout their years of service
to the public. It is these federal agents who have drafted the
procedures which forced the states to enact compulsory vaccination
legislation which had been drafted by the attorneys for the Medical
Monopoly, to become "the law of the land."

Medical historians have finally come to the reluctant conclusion
that the great flu "epidemic" of 1918 was solely attributable to the
widespread use of vaccines. It was the first war in which
vaccination was compulsory for all servicemen.

The Boston Herald
reported that forty-seven soldiers had been killed by vaccination in
one month. As a result, the military hospitals were filled, not with
wounded combat casualties, but with casualties of the vaccine. The
epidemic was called "the Spanish Influenza," a deliberately
misleading appellation, which was intended to conceal its origin.

This flu epidemic claimed twenty million victims; those who survived
it were the ones who had refused the vaccine. In recent years,
annual recurring epidemics of flu recalled "the Russian Flu." For
some reason, the Russians never protest, perhaps because the
Rockefellers make regular trips to Moscow to lay down the party
line.

The perils of vaccination were already known.

Plain Talk magazine
notes that,

"during the Franco-Prussian War, every German soldier was
vaccinated. The result was that 53,288 otherwise healthy men
developed smallpox. The death rate was high."

In what is now known as "the Great Swine Flu Massacre," the
President of the United States, Gerald Ford, was enlisted to
persuade the public to undergo a national vaccination campaign.

The
moving force behind the scheme was a $135 million windfall profit
for the major drug manufacturers. They had a "swine flu" vaccine
which suspicious pig raisers had refused to touch, fearful it might
wipe out their crop. The manufacturers had only tried to get $80
million from the swine breeders; balked in this sale, they turned to
the other market, humans.

The impetus for the national swine flu
vaccine came directly from the Disease Control Center in Atlanta,
Georgia. Perhaps coincidentally, Jimmy Carter, a member of the
Trilateral Commission, was then planning his presidential campaign
in Georgia.

The incumbent President, Gerald Ford, had all the
advantages of a massive bureaucracy to aid him in his election
campaign, while the ineffectual and little known Jimmy Carter
offered no serious threat to the election. Suddenly, out of Atlanta,
came the Centers for Disease Control plan for a national
immunization campaign against "swine flu."

The fact that there was
not a single known case of this flu in the United States did not
deter the Medical Monopoly from their scheme. The swine breeders had
been shocked by the demonstrations of the vaccine on a few pigs,
which had collapsed and died.

One can imagine the anxious
conferences in the headquarters of the great drug firms, until one
bright young man remarked,

"Well, if the swine breeders won’t inject
it into their animals, our only other market is to inject it into
people."

The Ford-sponsored swine flu campaign almost died an early death,
when a conscientious public servant, Dr. Anthony Morris, formerly of
HEW and then active as director of the Virus Bureau of the Food and
Drug Administration, declared that there could be no authentic swine
flu vaccine, because there had never been any cases of swine flu on
which they could test it.

Dr. Morris then went public with his
statement that "at no point were the swine flu vaccines effective."

He was promptly fired, but the damage had been done. The damage
control consisted of that great humanitarian, Walter Cronkite, and
the President of the United States, combining their forces to come
to the rescue of the Medical Monopoly. Walter Cronkite had
President
Ford appear on his news program to urge the American people to
submit to the inoculation with the swine flu vaccine.

CBS then or
later could never find any reason to air any analysis or scientific
critique of the swine flu vaccine, which was identified as
containing many toxic poisons, including alien vital protein
particles, formaldehyde, theimorosal (a derivative of poisonous
mercury), polysorbate and some eighty other substances.

Meanwhile, back at the virus laboratories, after Dr. Anthony Morris
has been summarily fired, a special team of workers was rushed in to
clean out the four rooms in which he had conducted his scientific
tests. The laboratory was filled with animals whose records verified
his claims, representing some three years of constant research.

All
of the animals were immediately destroyed, and Morris’ records were
burned. They did not go so far as to sow salt throughout the area,
because they believed their job was done.

On April 15, 1976, Congress passed Public Law 94-266, which provided
$135 million of taxpayers’ funds to pay for a national swine flu
inoculation campaign. HEW was to distribute the vaccine to state and
local health agencies on a national basis for inoculation, at no
charge. Insurance agencies then went public with their warning that
they would not insure drug firms against possible studies from the
results of swine flu inoculation, because no studies had been
carried out which could predict its effects.

It was to foil the
insurance companies that CBS had Gerald Ford make his impassioned
appeal to 215,000,000 Americans to save themselves while there was
still time, and to rush down to the friendly local health department
and get the swine flu vaccination, at absolutely no charge. This may
have been CBS’ finest hour in its distinguished career of "public
service."

Hardly had the swine flu campaign been completed than the reports of
the casualties began to pour in. Within a few months, claims
totaling $1.3 billion had been filed by victims who had suffered
paralysis from the swine flu vaccine. The medical authorities proved
equal to the challenge; they leaped to the defense of the Medical
Monopoly by labeling the new epidemic, "Guillain-Barre Syndrome."

There have since been increasing speculations that the ensuing
epidemic of AIDS which began shortly after Gerald Ford’s public
assurances, were merely a viral variation of the swine flu vaccine.
And what of the perpetrator of the Great Swine Flu Massacre,
President Gerald Ford?

As the logical person to blame for the
catastrophe, Ford had to endure a torrent of public criticism, which
quite naturally resulted in his defeat for election (he had
previously been appointed when the agents of the international drug
operations had ushered Richard Nixon out of office).

The unknown Jimmy Carter, familiar only to the super-secret fellow members of
the Trilateral Commission, was swept into office by the outpouring
of rage against Gerald Ford. Carter proved to be almost as serious a
national disaster as the swine flu epidemic, while Gerald Ford was
retired from politics to life. Not only did he lose the election, he
was also sentenced to spend his remaining years trudging wearily up
and down the hot sandy stretches of the Palm Springs Golf course.

"immunization programs against flu,
measles, mumps and polio may actually be seeding humans with RNA to
form pro-viruses which will then become latent cells throughout the
body ... they can then become activated as a variety of diseases
including lupus, cancer, rheumatism and arthritis."

This was a remarkable verification of the earlier warning delivered
by Dr. Herbert Snow of London more than fifty years earlier.

He had
observed that the long-term effects of the vaccine, lodging in the
heart or other parts of the body, would eventually result in fatal
damage to the heart. The vaccine becomes a time bomb in the system,
festering as what are known as "slow viruses", which may take ten to
thirty years to become virulent. When that time arrives, the victim
is felled by a fatal onslaught, often with no prior warning, whether
it is a heart attack or some other disease.

Herbert M. Shelton wrote in 1938 in his book,
Exploitation Of Human
Suffering that,

"Vaccine is pus - either septic or inert - if inert
it will not take - if septic it produces infection."

This explains
why some children have to go back and receive a second inoculation,
because the first one did not "take" - it was not sufficiently
poisonous, and did not infect the body. Shelton says that the
inoculations cause sleeping sickness, infantile paralysis, haemophlagia or tetanus.

The Surgeon General of the United States, Leonard Scheele, pointed
out to the annual AMA convention in 1955 that,

"No batch of vaccine
can be proven safe before it is given to children."

James R. Shannon
of the National Institute of Health declared that,

"The only safe
vaccine is a vaccine that is never used."

With the advent of
Dr. Jonas Salk’s polio vaccine in the 1950s
American parents were assured that the problem had been solved, and
that their children were now safe.

The ensuing suits against the
drug manufacturers received little publicity. David v. Wyeth Labs, a
suit involving Type 3 Sabin Polio Vaccine, was judged in favor of
the plaintiff, David. A suit against Lederle Lab involving
Orimune
Vaccine was settled in 1962 for $10,000. In two cases involving
Parke-Davis’ Quadrigen, the product was found to be defective. In
1962, Parke-Davis halted all production of Quadrigen.

The medical
loner, Dr. William Koch, declared that,

"The injection of any serum,
vaccine, or even penicillin has shown a very marked increase in the
incidence of polio, at least by 400%."

The Centers for Disease Control stayed out of sight for some time
after the Great Swine Flu Massacre, only to emerge more stridently
than ever with a new national scare program on the dangers of
another plague, which was named "Legionnaires’ Disease" after an
outbreak at the Bellevue Stratford Hotel in Philadelphia.

SWINE VIRUS

****ALERT****In a headline from the Dec. 18, 1995 edition of the
San Francisco
Examiner we read the following AP story:

A human influenza virus and a swine virus somehow lodge near each
other in the throat of a porker. The two viruses exchange DNA,
forming a unique genetic combination. Suddenly a brand new form of
influenza is born.

With a simple snort by the pig, the new flu is airborne and
introduced into the world. Inhaled by the farmer, it quickly
reproduces by the millions and is transported to town, passed around
to other humans and then hitches a ride to the city in the bronchial
passages of a traveler.

Within days, thousands of humans are hacking, coughing and feverish
from the new virus. The bug continues to spread, to train stations,
airports and ships. In only a few weeks, a virus created by chance
in that remote pig pen is felling people on six continents around
the world.

That, many experts say, is how the next pandemic - or
worldwide
epidemic - of killer flu could happen. Time after time, going back
hundreds of years, new forms of the flu bug have broken loose and
killed millions. Now, say the experts, the world may be overdue for
that to happen yet again.

In an age of antibiotics and vaccines, most people regard flu as
dangerous only to the elderly, the very young and those already ill.

But, to experts, it lurks as a constant threat to all.

"Flu in the last decade has assumed something of a secondary
status," said Dr. John LaMentague of the National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

"But we who have dealt with the
infection recognize its power." The flu virus, he said, "is
constantly changing and dynamic and very resourceful."

MORE ON VIRUSES

In Dr. Eva Snead’s
Some Call It AIDS - I Call It Murder, we read
[quoting portions from several chapters:]

Vaccines, Friend or Foe?Under the title of "Bad Vaccines?", a journal as conservative as
Newsweek expounds on the subject of vaccine contamination with
retrovital microbes.

"Could any of the world’s stock of vaccine be
contaminated by animal retroviruses similar to AIDS?", it asks.

It
tells of Jeremy Rifkin’s request that the World Health Organization
test its smallpox vaccines for such contaminants.

In the case of
Rifkin’s concern about the smallpox vaccination, the
main concern was to find possible "BIV" closely related to the human
AIDS virus - and people at high risk of exposure, such as
meatpackers, for BIV antibodies.

Type "A" blood substance and "some other proteins" are
unexpected materials present in cultures used to manufacture
vaccinesHumans have diverse blood groups, the most well known are "A", "B"
and "0". Blood groups determine compatibility or lack thereof, in
blood transfusions. Animal blood and tissues contain a substance
that is very similar to blood substance "A".

Substances with a
proteic structure, promote the production of
antibodies when injected. Some aspects of this subject were
discussed at the 1967 NCI meeting by Dr. J.P. Fox, who was intrigued
about certain myxoviruses which had surface antigens on them.

He
wondered if they provoked antibody responses in recipients.

"The crude influenza vaccines we have been using in the past do
contain group "A" blood substance ... This substance also is found
in chick embryo. So either the influenza virus has group "A"
substance in it ... or else the vaccine carries some of the chick
embryo with it."

"And I pointed out there is a lot of chick embryo protein in
finished influenza vaccine, and the group A substance probably comes
from the chick embryo tissues; this can be eliminated as a
significant problem IF the influenza virus is grown in a cleaner
substrate or is purified. Certainly, the myxoviruses do carry over
some of the host protein."

Again, the total lack of control of procedure, and scientific
accuracy is appalling.

I think that a butcher places more emphasis
in properly dissecting a side of beef, than a cell culture lab in
supervising the accuracy of such a dangerous undertaking.

Adenovirus and SV-40, A Dangerous CombinationA favorite cop-out used by virologists and other "scientists" who
wish to conceal their closet-skeletons, is that inter-species
infection with viruses is difficult.

They usually refer to
single-virus tests, not the use of viral systems. For instance,
although human adenoviruses infect monkey kidneys rather poorly, if SV-40 is added, the human adenovirus infection becomes strong and lytic (destructive) of the cells.

According to Fox and Baum,

"The
ability of SV-40 genetic material to increase the yield of
adenovirus by 100 or 1,000 fold has been termed enhancement."

On the other hand, stocks E46 and SP2 of a certain strain of
adenovirus (type 7) can induce the information of papovavirus SV40
tumor antigen (T antigen) in African Green Monkey Kidney cells (GMK).

What actually happens is that a new virus may form when an
adenovirus acquires new genetic material from the 8V-40 virus. These
viral combinations were called hybrids in 1965, whereas today they
are referred to as recombinants. Since we have established this
equivalence, we must become aware, at this moment, that genetic
engineering was alive and well long before anyone had used that
term, and in total absence of any containment precautions or
regulations.

The impact this may have had on the environment is
probably just manifesting with the plagues of the eighties and
nineties.

Since SV-40 has such an enhancing effect on adenovirus, and hybrids
(combinations, or what today we would call recombinants) of SV-40
and adenovirus are found in monkey kidneys used in the process of
vaccine manufacturing, many virologists have researched other such
SF-40 and other virus combinations. They found several, including
measles + SV-40, foamy virus + SV-40 reovirus + SV-40.

SV-40 is like
good rum, a great mixer!

[And last, but certainly not least, from
Dr. Snead:]

The African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) ConnectionSome "AIDS" patients harbor swine fever viruses similar to those
found in certain specialized research centers.

A scientist who worked in Uganda in 1985, reported to
Senator Ted
Kennedy about a civil war in that country, which was accompanied by
an epidemic of African Swine Fever Virus. At the same time, AIDS
cases were being reported in alarming numbers. The researcher
noticed that swine were roaming freely in people’s yards. This
information was released in the New York Native of Sept. 30, 1985.

These facts were not particularly appreciated by the medical
establishment, and those who dared pursue this line of thinking were
chided in more than one way.

Dr. C.L.V. Martins, who researched phenomena occurring in swine,
studied the behavior of one of the cellular elements that protects
the body: the macrophage.

"Loss of macrophage function during
infection may be important in determining resistance or
susceptibility of a host."

In all the studies performed by this
author, the macrophages not only had reduced function, but they also
often kept the virus in a latent state.

These studies were done on
swine, not humans. Since one must be exposed to raw, living pig
tissue and fluids to acquire these viruses, most people assume they
could not be infected with these organisms in the daily course of
their lives.

But the truth lies elsewhere. With the usual hypocrisy
so characteristic of bureaucracies, humans are, on the one hand,
frequently warned of the dangers inherent to the improper cooking of
pork, and, on the other, fed raw swine-juice ever since their birth,
by direct command of health authorities. Impossible?

All vaccines
are treated with trypsin, raw stomach extracts of swine.
Insulin and
other biologicals of porcine origin are other sources. Those who
dared to suggest that AIDS could have some connection with swine flu
were violently chided by the powers of the "health and illness
monopoly".

The violent reaction of the establishment against those
who first found porcine viruses in AIDS patients and then informed
the public is highly suspicious and may suggest that some cover-up
is under way.

BLACK PLAGUE NEEDED

In a newspaper clipping with the above headline, source unknown,
which reads "excerpted from Dr. Aurelio Peccei of the
Club of Rome’s
News Watch magazine from Jan. 2, 1995," we see the following,

Sir Julian Huxley said,

"Overpopulation is, in my
opinion, the most serious threat to the whole future of our
species."

The project, called MK-NAOMI, was carried out at
Fort Detrick, Maryland. AIDS was made to reduce the population.

Specifically targeted were the black, Hispanic, and
homosexual
populations.

The incurable disease AIDS has been spread with the willful aid of
international agencies whose policies call for a drastic reduction
of the population, using any means necessary. Already, medical
experts say as many as 30 million people in Africa have been
infected with the AIDS virus.

WHO,
World Health Organization, was established in 1948 with the
help of Dr. John Rawlings Rees, the psychological warfare expert
whose notorious Tavistock Institute and Clinic in London used
brainwashing techniques as a means to carry out racial policies of
genocide.

Since its inception, the WHO membership and policies have overlapped
those of the WFMH and UNESCO, established in 1946 by British
racialist Julian Huxley, as a vehicle for wiping out
3rd World
populations with a new "Dark Ages" of famine and pestilence.

Each of the organizations named were set up as a project of the
British "liberal" networks of Bertrand Russell and company whose
explicit, stated policies of population control included Russell’s
published call for the "creation of a Black Death every 50 years" to
curb the black and yellow population.

The Club of Rome’s raison d’être is to wipe out half the human race
in this century.

Several Top Secret recommendations were made by
Dr. Aurelio Peccei
of the
Club of Rome. He advocated that a plague be introduced that
would have the same effect as the famous Black Death of history.

The
chief recommendation was to develop a microbe which would attack the
auto-immune system and thus render the development of a vaccine
impossible.

PAST PLAGUES

In Michael Tobias’ book
World War Ill - Population And The Biosphere
At The End Of The Millennium, he writes:

Until recently, human beings were very much a part of this
biological system of checks and balances, which seem to hold firm
for all organisms.

Four primary inclemencies kept Homo Sapiens in
relative population calm: high infant mortality, war, famine, and
disease, all contributing to a meager life expectancy. The
Black Plague (Pasteurella pestis) was transmitted from the Tibetan Silk
Route to a harbor at Sicily in 1347.

Rodents account for 50 percent
of all mammals, and it was the friendly rat, carrier of the rat flea
(Xenopsylla cheopis), that caused such demolition. At least
30
percent of the human population died out - 50 percent between
Iceland and India. Boom and bust need operate according to food
scarcities and resulting famine. Disease, acting upon a host, or
dense network of hosts, plays a similar role in the maintenance of
populations.

Not unlike the moths and the lemmings, Europeans
witnessed a spectacular revival of their populations within a
century of the Plague, exceeding their pre-Plague numbers.

A climatic change in eighteenth century Scandinavia allegedly
compelled the Norwegian gray rat (which does not carry the plague)
to find passage into western Europe, where it successfully ousted
the indigenous flea-carrying black rat, thus eliminating the most
incisive threat to human population.

"More than any single carrier, it is human encroachment that
ultimately precipitates the emergence of killer viruses," writes
Stephen S. Morse.

In Japan (Japanese encephalitis),
Argentina
(hemorrhagic fever), U.S. (Seoul virus in Baltimore),
Panama
(Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis), and in nearly every other
country, the connection between increasing ecological destruction
and the sudden exposure of humans to long isolated or dormant
bacteria, protozoans, fungi and viruses, has been identified.

Never before has there been such an avid exchange of "information"
between large species (Homo Sapiens) and microbes. Of the more than
100 zoonoses (animal infections transmittable to humans) and over
520 known arthropod-born "arboviruses", at least 100 have been shown
to cause diseases in people. Some are among the deadliest diseases
every encountered. In 1976 in Zaire and Sudan, as many as 90 percent
of those infected with Ebola virus died horribly within weeks.

The most recent incident of plague, caused by the bacterium Yersinia
pestis, occurred in India at the turn of the twentieth century and
killed more than 10 million people. At the same time, a small
outbreak among Chinese occurred in San Francisco. Another outbreak
of the magnitude of that in India has been postulated for the United
States.

In 1918 influenza A pandemic claimed 20 million lives worldwide in
less than a year. It is believed to have originated in the United
States, went to France, then returned to the U.S. where it spread
rapidly from New York to California.

Since then there have been
serious global influenza outbreaks on at least five occasions.

While I was working on this portion of the depopulation story,
Hatonn wrote "Disaster In Flu’s Clothing".
Hatonn’s timely warning
further emphasizes the immediate importance of this subject
currently at hand.

It is for this reason that I have chosen to
somewhat expand Part V to include many current alarming headlines on
the very subject of viruses and current disease.

AND NOW A LOOK AT SOME CURRENT HEADLINES

Global diseases close to "crisis", blood
probe toldIn a story from the Dec. 2, 1995 edition of The Toronto Star,
written by Nick Pron, we read:

The spread of infectious diseases worldwide is reaching "crisis"
levels, and no country is immune to the problem, a federal
Commission was told yesterday.

Canadians have to "stop thinking of
ourselves in terms of isolation from the rest of the world" and get
"tuned in to what’s happening around the planet," Dr. Kevin Kain
told the inquiry conducted by Mr. Justice Horace Krever, who is
probing the safety of Canada’s blood system.

Officials Warn of a Virus Deadly to ChildrenIn the Dec. 8, 1995 edition of the New York Times, we read:

A winter respiratory virus that kills about 4,500 children a year in
the United States has appeared once again, with cases already being
reported across the country, federal health officials said today.

The officials of the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
here, said respiratory syncytial virus, or R.S.V., caused 90,000
infants and young children to be hospitalized each year with lower
respiratory tract disease.

Dr. Tom Torok, a medical epidemiologist at the agency’s National
Center for Infectious Disease, said the virus could also cause
serious respiratory disease in the elderly and in people with
weakened immune systems.

"R.S.V. is under-appreciated as a cause of respiratory disease in
adults," he said. "The actual magnitude has not been well studied."

During the last month, the virus has been found in all 44 states
that report the results of tests for it. Activity usually begins in
early November, peaks between late January and mid-February and
continues until April or early May.

Dr. Torok said the virus was most difficult to distinguish from
influenza when it occurred in adults. "We don’t really know whether
or not there are good clinical indicators of R.S.V. versus
influenza," he said.

Researchers are working on vaccines to protect against the
respiratory virus and are studying the effect of giving infants a
serum laden with antibodies against it.

13,000 a day infected by HIV

One out of five carriers of deadly virus lives in southeast Asia

In the Dec. 1, 1995 edition of the Calgary Herald we read:

About 13,000 people a day worldwide are infected by the virus that
causes AIDS, and southeast Asia is fast becoming a main casualty
zone for the disease, a leading U.S. expert said Thursday.

Jonathan Mann, director of the Global AIDS Policy Coalition, an
independent international research group based at the Harvard School
of Public Health, said one out of five carriers of HIV lives in
southeast Asia.

"We estimate that during 1995, about 4.7 million people became newly
infected with HIV around the world."If it continues to go as it is, it may well be in the 70-80 million
range by the year 2000."

Plagues scourge Latin America as experts despairIn an article from the Nov. 29, 1995 edition of The Montreal
Gazette, written by Laurie Goering we read:

Manaus Brazil - It starts with a fever, like a hundred less deadly
plagues. Then comes a growing weakness. The skin turns yellow. In
the abdomen, internal bleeding begins. Soon blood pours from the
body, through the eyes and in the endless black vomit. In nine out
of ten cases, the liver dissolves and the victim dies.

lt’s not Ebola. It’s Labrea black fever, just one of a half dozen
deadly and little understood viral diseases, emerging from the rain
forest of Latin America.

"People all the time are going to the
jungle and coming back with strange fevers no one knows about" said
Bedsy Dutary Thatcher, a malaria specialist at Brazil’s National
Institute for Amazon Research in Manaus. "If we started looking for
them we could isolate a new variety every week."

Perhaps never has the battle against disease looked so bleak as it
does right now in Latin America and in much of the Third World.

Across the planet, new diseases are appearing at a frightening pace,
researchers say. Even more disturbing: old scourges once thought
relegated to history are making a comeback, particularly in Latin
America.

Tuberculosis, thought conquered after the introduction of new drugs
in the 1940s, has roared back and is spreading out of control.
Malaria, one of the world’s oldest plagues, also is making a
comeback. Latin America reported more than a million new cases last
year, half of them in Brazil.

In Nicaragua and
Honduras, a mystery illness characterized by
chills, fever and severe bleeding in the lungs has been tentatively
identified as leptospirosis, an animal disease contracted through
contact with animal waste. The outbreak has killed 16 people and
sickened more than 2,000 in the two countries over the last two
months. A similar outbreak in Brazil killed more than 40 people in
February.

In Colombia, what appears to have been an outbreak of mosquito-borne
equine encephalitis killed at least 26 people and drove 13,000
others to seek treatment in September.

In Mexico and across much of Latin America dengue fever,
characterized by high fever and intense body pain, has struck nearly
200,000 people this year and is threatening to move into the United
States. A deadly variant of the disease, dengue hemorrhagic fever,
has stricken another 3,500 people.

In Guyana, an unidentified illness characterized by high fever,
vomiting and convulsions killed five toddlers and threatened eight
others at an eastern Guyana hospital this month.

"Communicable diseases are resurging," said
Dan Epstein, a spokesman
for the Pan American Health Organization, based in Washington, D.C.
"We’ve had a whole series of hemorrhagic fevers, including dengue,
and the problems continue to increase."

Deadly VirusSecond outbreak of Ebola checked

In a newspaper clipping faxed to us this week, we read the following
AP story:

Experts trying to contain an outbreak of the deadly Ebola virus in
Liberia are investigating reports of deaths in a second location, a
World Health Organization spokesman said.

Ebola Tamed - for NowIn the Jan. 1996 edition of Discover appears an article of the above
title. This article opens with,

"Last Spring’s plague movie,
Outbreak, had to compete with a real life cliff-hanger: an
appearance, in Zaire, of the dreaded Ebola virus."

Contained within this article on Ebola, is another article written
by Sarah Richardson titled "Breakbone Outbreak", which opens with:

"While Zaire’s deadly
Ebola virus was flaring up briefly, a far more
widespread vital scourge was threatening the Americas. In 1995
dengue fever, nicknamed breakbone fever for the terrible joint pain
it causes, reached epidemic proportions in Latin America and
Caribbean countries, sickening more than 140,000 and killing 38."

Have you noticed that CNN, within the last two or three months, has
run several half-hour specials on Ebola Zaire? Coincidence?

They
said in one program that it isn’t a question of if, it is a question
of when Ebola will strike in the United States. Also keep in mind
what Peter Kawaja has said about the Gulf War Illness - being a form
of Ebola Reston, a slow acting form of Ebola.

More on that later.

HEPATITIS

In a one-page ad appearing in the Jan. 11, 1996 edition of
Rolling
Stone magazine, we read:

"Five million Americans have hepatitis. Do you?"

In another headline from the Nov. 29, 1995 edition of
The Montreal
Gazette:

Aussies exult as deadly virus hits rabbitsBroken Hill, Australia - It sounds like a script for a horror film:
a deadly virus escapes from a biohazard lab. Corpses litter the
landscape as a plague spreads across a continent.

But rather than flee in terror, Australians are cheering a virus
that is wiping out rabbits across the outback. The real plague,
people say, is the rabbit population.

"It’s history, and we’ll look back on this month and say what a
wonderful thing it was," said sheep-rancher David Lord.

In a faxed newspaper article appearing in the Dec. 24, 1995 edition
of the Chicago Tribune, written by Kenan Heise, sent to us with a
note written across the top which says, "This is how they
silence...", we read:

Obituaries

George B. Craig, Jr., 65; expert on disease-carrying mosquitoes

George B. Craig, Jr., 65, an entomologist and professor of biology
at the University of Notre Dame, was a world-renowned expert on
mosquitoes, particularly those that transmit such diseases as yellow
and dengue fevers and encephalitis.

A resident of South Bend, Indiana, he died Thursday at a meeting of
the American Society of Entomologists in Las Vegas. Professor Craig has been outspoken in his criticism of this
country’s failure to control the spread of the Aedes albopictus, or
Asian tiger mosquito.

This species, named for the stripes on the
mosquitoes’ legs and bodies, probably invaded the United States in a
shipment of used tires sent to Houston from Japan in 1985. Although
rare in the North, the mosquitoes have been seen in the Chicago
area. They carry sometimes fatal diseases such as dengue and several
forms of encephalitis.

Professor Craig co-wrote a report in a 1992 issue of the journal
Science that established that the species had carried a serious
illness into this country - Eastern equine encephalitis. In a 1992
Tribune interview, he reported that half of those who recover from
the disease "have destroyed brains" and that "of all kinds of
encephalitis, this is by far the worst."

Most recently, he had been directing research of the dengue
hemorrhagic fever epidemic that began in Mexico and has crossed into
the U.S., as well as of an encephalitis epidemic in
Michigan and an
outbreak of LaCrosse encephalitis in West Virginia.

Horses, Handlers Killed by Mystery VirusIn an article from the Dec. 5, 1995 edition of the
Daily Times of
Harrison, Arkansas, written by AP writer Peter James Spielmann,

Sydney, Australia

- First the horses lost their appetite, then they
began to twitch. That turned into convulsions, the animals flailing
against their stalls. Within two weeks, their lungs hemorrhaged and
they drowned in their own blood, which gushed from their mouths and
nostrils. Then the disease struck the horses’ handlers, eating holes
in their lungs until they choked to death.

It was the first time in medical history that a virus previously
unknown to science suddenly appeared in one mammal and then jumped
to another with such deadly effect, killing two horse handlers.

The culprit: a type of morbillivirus, from the family of viruses
that include measles, canine distemper and cattle plague.

But it is unclear why it suddenly became so virulent, why it has
adapted to killing humans and when it will strike again.

More on EbolaIn John Coleman’s new book titled,
Socialism: The Road To Slavery,
we read [quoting:]

The "surplus to requirements" population of the world - and this
includes the United States - is already being decimated by
laboratory made mutant viruses that are killing hundreds of
thousands of people.

This process will be speeded up in terms of the
Club of Rome’s
Global 2000 Report genocidal blueprint - after the mobs have
served their purpose. The experiments begun in Sierra Leone with
Lassa fever and media visna mutant viruses is being brought to
perfection in the laboratories of Harvard University in August of
1994.

A new, even more deadly virus than AIDS is about to be released.

Already released and working with deadly efficiency are the new flu
viruses. These mutant flu viruses are believed to be 100 percent
more effective than the "Spanish flu" viruses tested on French
Moroccan troops in the fading days of WWI. Like the Lassa fever
viruses, the "Spanish flu" virus got out of control, and in 1919,
swept the world and killed more people than the total military
casualties of both sides in WWI.

There was no stopping it.
Casualties in the United States were horrendous. One out of every
seven people in big cities in America were swept away by "Spanish
flu". People fell ill in the morning from fever and a debilitating
tiredness. Within one or two days, they died - by the millions.

Who knows when the new flu mutant viruses will strike? In 1995 or
perhaps the summer of 1966? Nobody knows. Also waiting in the wings
is Ebola fever, its proper title, "Ebola Zaire" named after the
African country of Zaire, where it first surfaced. Ebola fever
cannot be stopped; it is a merciless killer, which acts fast and
leaves its victims horribly contorted and bleeding from every
opening in the body.

Recently, Ebola Zaire has surfaced in the
United States, but the news media and the Centers for Disease
Control are saying little about it. Research experiments have been
going on with Ebola viruses at the U.S. Army Medical Research
Institute involving this and other highly dangerous viruses.

What is the purpose behind unleashing these dreadful killer viruses?
Population control is given as the reason, and if we read the
statements made by Lord Bertrand Russell, Robert S. McNamara and
H.G.
Wells, the new killer viruses are merely what these men said was
coming.

In the eyes of the
Committee of 300 and the Socialist
camarilla, there are just too many unwanted people on the Earth.

But that is not the whole story. The real reason behind the alarmed
global mass genocide is to create a climate of instability.
Destabilize nations, set people’s hearts fluttering with fear. War
is part of that plan, and in 1994, war is everywhere.