[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14283865#comment-14283865
]
Hudson commented on YARN-2933:
------------------------------
FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Java8 #76 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Java8/76/])
YARN-2933. Capacity Scheduler preemption policy should only consider capacity without labels
temporarily. Contributed by Mayank Bansal (wangda: rev 0a2d3e717d9c42090a32ff177991a222a1e34132)
* hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/monitor/capacity/ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy.java
* hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/monitor/capacity/TestProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy.java
* hadoop-yarn-project/CHANGES.txt
> Capacity Scheduler preemption policy should only consider capacity without labels temporarily
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-2933
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2933
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: capacityscheduler
> Reporter: Wangda Tan
> Assignee: Mayank Bansal
> Fix For: 2.7.0
>
> Attachments: YARN-2933-1.patch, YARN-2933-2.patch, YARN-2933-3.patch, YARN-2933-4.patch,
YARN-2933-5.patch, YARN-2933-6.patch, YARN-2933-7.patch, YARN-2933-8.patch, YARN-2933-9.patch
>
>
> Currently, we have capacity enforcement on each queue for each label in CapacityScheduler,
but we don't have preemption policy to support that. YARN-2498 is targeting to support preemption
respect node labels, but we have some gaps in code base, like queues/FiCaScheduler should
be able to get usedResource/pendingResource, etc. by label. These items potentially need to
refactor CS which we need spend some time carefully think about.
> For now, what immediately we can do is allow calculate ideal_allocation and preempt containers
only for resources on nodes without labels, to avoid regression like: A cluster has some nodes
with labels and some not, assume queueA isn't satisfied for resource without label, but for
now, preemption policy may preempt resource from nodes with labels for queueA, that is not
correct.
> Again, it is just a short-term enhancement, YARN-2498 will consider preemption respecting
node-labels for Capacity Scheduler which is our final target.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)