On 05/02/2013 09:52 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 12:31 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:>> On 04/30/2013 05:30 AM, Andreas Müller wrote:>>> as discussed in [1-2]>>>>>> [1] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-April/039025.html>>> [2] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-April/039027.html>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com>>>> --->>> meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato.bb | 2 +->>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)>>>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato.bb b/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato.bb>>> index e3246d2..76abb17 100644>>> --- a/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato.bb>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato.bb>>> @@ -8,4 +8,4 @@ LICENSE = "MIT">>>>>> inherit core-image>>>>>> -IMAGE_INSTALL += "packagegroup-core-x11-sato-games">>> +IMAGE_INSTALL += "packagegroup-core-x11-sato-games udev-extraconf">>>>>>> I believe that we should also have the udev-extraconf added to the>> core-image-lsb, I will add a follow-on patch for that.>> I'll take changes removing the core dependency however I think one of> the packagegroups ideally needs this addition, not such which one> though.>
After looking at this again, I think it might be more complex, do we
want the extraconf files unconditionally in for both sysvinit and
systemd? There are 2 packagegroups where it would make sense to have
them for sysvinit based system to have similar behavior as before
systemd: packagegroup-core-basic (which feeds the lsb images) and
packagegroup-core-x11-sato. It may need to be anonymous code that
checks for systemd as the udev provider.
Thoughts?
Sau!
> Cheers,>> Richard>>>

On 2 May 2013 19:16, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> After looking at this again, I think it might be more complex, do we want> the extraconf files unconditionally in for both sysvinit and systemd?
Where we want udev-extraconf, we don't care if the init manager is
sysvinit or systemd as they both use udev (just different versions).
Ross