JG: Contact Madelaine Rothberg, Marjia, Eric Hanson, Ian send proposal
related to multi-media terminology to AU and GL with history and proposal to
reconcile any current or potential differences between documents.

Chair note: The wrong telephone number was provided by the
chair in the announcement for the telecon and 6 members of the group called
into the announced phone number. Two people eventually called the number the
group was scheduled to be on. The chair apologizes to the working group for
providing the wrong information.

34.WC: Take form submission to GL WG to discuss issues related to
inadvertent submission.

Announcements

1.Web Content is rechartering - announced - 2 stage process, 1.1 version,
then work on major revision

2.New telecon day and time for working group start on 6 January 2000
Thursdays, 2-3:30pm (EST, USA), on Longfellow Bridge (+1-617-252-1038)

Discussion

1.Candidate Recommendation Stage

Are we obligated?
Showing implementations to director and in techniques document?

jg: review-new stage of recommendation. Proposed Rec-Candidate
(implementation period-demonstrate that guidelines are implementable)-Full Rec.
Our obligation-that our technical guidelines are usable by vendors, show an
example of each checkpoint in a browser or demonstration project. Where no
clear implementation get a vendor to make an example.

rs:will it push out timeline?

jg: should not puch out timeline. rs would be a good resource for DOM
demonstration, not asking for commitment. need examples of guideline 5....other
comments

rs: want to become more involved in DOM working group

jg: look through techniques, and fill in blanks

mq: send information to reviewers about new process

jg: reviews might not know about new process

mq: feedback about status of document

LC#137: Use of terms for disabilities, impairment -- add in agenda

jg: Denis Anson brought WHO def to f2f. jg brought to coordination
group...CG those defs are medical model, contemporary-more positive, inclusive.
Many disability groups do not like WHO def. CG recommends using standing def.
in the current document. Comments....

mq: so we don't have to change anything. its all personal preference

jg: good for keeping in harmony with other documents, and Judy Brewer would
balk. Issue closed. no decension in group.

jg: coordinate with AU - not addressed in their document. should not have
dependencies. may have a problem with web content. WCGL is not chartered hard
to get together. send proposal to AU and GL with history and proposal. Action
item for Madelaine Rothberg, Marjia, Eric Hanson.

IJ: Is it P1 to be able to trigger some functionalities (non-configurable)
with a single key?

RS: Does this include closing the application?

JG: That's the problem, you don't know what people want.

RS: Single key could be hit multiple times. But this gets messy.

GR: Proposed useful baseline for deciding what's necessary for single-key
access: there are many single actions that you find on a menu bar. Perhaps
start by saying "For all single actions enabled by the UI".

IJ: In Word, for example, you can put buttons for each functionality on the
tool bar.