Mr. Ellis graduated with honors from the University of Texas, receiving a B.A. in political science in 1997. He obtained his law degree in 2002 from the University of Texas School of Law, where he was a member of the Texas Law Review. Following graduation, he served as a law clerk on the Texas Supreme Court. He is admitted to practice in Texas (2003), New York (2002), and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern, Northern, Western, and Eastern Districts of Texas. He is also a member of the American Bar Association, Texas Young Lawyers Association, the Austin Bar Association, and Austin Young Lawyers Association.

Mr. Ellis has received several awards recognizing both his exceptional abilities as a lawyer and his substantial contributions to the community: the Austin Bar Association’s award as Austin Outstanding Young Lawyer for 2009, the Austin Under 40 Award in the Legal Category in 2008 (www.austinunder40.org), and the Austin United Way’s 2007 Young Professional of the Year. The magazine Law and Politics has repeatedly recognized him as a “Rising Star”—both in eminent domain (2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013) and in commercial litigation (2006, 2007).

Mr. Ellis is the author of the Austin Chronicle’s “The Common Law,” an informational monthly column about everyday legal issues, and for five years he hosted News8Austin’s weekly television news segment of the same name. He served on the Board of Directors for Austin Habitat for Humanity for seven years (2006-2012) and served two terms as board president. He participated in a post-tsunami home building project in Sri Lanka with Habitat for Humanity International and is a founding member, former chair, and advisory board member of Austin Habitat Young Professionals. He previously served as a co-chair and guest lecturer for the People’s Law School, an annual Austin Bar Association event designed to teach people about their legal rights. A 2007 graduate of Leadership Austin, Mr. Ellis served on the advisory committee for the first ever Leadership Austin Emerge class.

EDUCATION

B.A., Political Science, University of Texas at Austin, 1997 (with honors).

J.D., University of Texas School of Law, 2002 (with honors, Texas Law Review).

QUOTES

Times Record News – Wichita Falls, Texas

February 18, 2015

After a three-day trial in Wichita County Court at Law No. 1, jurors awarded Edward Clack $393,165, the full amount he requested. Judge Gary Butler entered a judgment of $445,365, which includes interest and court costs. Oncor may appeal.

“This judgment sends a clear message, Texas landowners should understand that they have a constitutional right to collect fair damages when power lines lower the value of their land. Landowners only get one opportunity to recover, but the easements remain forever,” said Austin-based eminent domain attorney Luke Ellis in a news release.

Star-Telegram — Fort Worth, Texas:August 12, 2014
Luke Ellis, an Austin attorney specializing in eminent domain cases, said operators refuse to show in court why their pipelines should be common carriers, claiming it is proprietary information.

Getting that information can be difficult.

“There needs to be more meat on the bone to prove common carrier status,” Ellis said. “There isn’t any routing process that exists. … They can just pick the way they want.”

Brady and Ellis suggest that a system similar to that used by the Texas Public Utility Commission for locating power lines might be warranted.

Everyone affected by a power line location is notified and has a chance to talk about it. Hearings are held before anything happens. The PUC has used this process for years, they said.

Cannon, however, said there is nothing to keep a landowner from going to the courthouse.

“The rule does not change the landowners’ right to take this to District Court, if they want to,” Cannon said.

Ellis said that is true. But though he persuaded a Johnson County jury this year to order a pipeline operator to pay $1.6 million for an easement to cross property in Mansfield — 20 times more than the company offered originally — that case started in 2007 and appeals may take two more years, he said.

Stop the Pipeline:July 22, 2014

“This verdict sends a strong message that pipeline easements often cause significant damages to property beyond the easement area,” says Austin-based eminent domain attorney Luke Ellis of Johns Marrs Ellis & Hodge LLP, who represented the family partnership at trial. “Unfortunately, many Texas landowners don’t realize that they have a constitutional right to seek just compensation for such damages.”

KGNS — Laredo, Texas:June 18, 2014

Luke Ellis, who represented the Johnson County landowner in its case against Peregrine, said, “I think that juries are becoming much more sensitive to the potential negative impacts that pipeline easements can cause to property.”

Houston Chronicle — Houston, Texas:May 22, 2014

Disputes between pipeline companies wanting to pay the lowest possible price and landowners demanding the maximum possible remuneration have led to a booming business for Luke Ellis and other attorneys who specialize in eminent domain cases. Ellis says too many landowners don’t get compensated for the damages to the adjacent property they own, which could lose value by having a pipeline nearby.

“We’re seeing a much larger number of pipeline acquisition and takings cases, and we’re certainly seeing a lot more landowners becoming more knowledgeable about what their rights might be,” Ellis said. “The typical impediment to getting a case resolved is a drastically different view of how the pipeline damages the remaining property.”

Ellis said cases typically go to trial before a county court-of-law jury. Both sides present evidence for why their valuation is the best.

Star-Telegram — Fort Worth, Texas:May 20, 2014

“One of the big issues was determining how much land does the landowner own and its value,” Ellis said. The case was eventually settled.

Those kinds of challenges would certainly come into play in a battle with the bureau.

“I would tell folks to be patient, but if it appears the federal government is going forward to assert claims, I would tell folks they need to hire a lawyer,” Ellis said.

If the agency moves forward with its assertion that this has always been public land, Ellis said, title searches would probably have to be conducted all the way back to the Louisiana Purchase in 1803. Landowners would be wise to pool resources for a costly legal battle, some suggest.

“You’ve got to win on two fronts,” Ellis said. “On a takings claim, you’ve got to prove an ownership right to this property. And if you win on that front, you’ve got to prove what are your damages.”

This case is important for all landowners because it indicates that when property is taken for an easement, the compensation due must consider not only the value of the strip of property taken, but also includes monetary impacts on the remaining land.

Luke Ellis, attorney for the landowners, explained that although this case did not involve agricultural land, the same issue can arise when dealing with condemnation of farms or ranches. Specifically, all landowners should seek compensation not only for the taking of the easement itself, but for adverse impacts that will have on the remaining property including the loss of the right to exclude others from coming and going on private property, the loss of development potential, and any onerous terms that are imposed on the landowner by the easement agreement.

Powell Shale Digest — Fort Worth, Texas:April 1, 2014

According to a statement issued by Eagle Ford’s attorney, Austin lawyer Luke Ellis, “this verdict sends a strong message that pipeline easements often cause significant damages to property beyond the easement area.” Ellis said “many Texas landowners don’t realize that they have a constitutional right to seek just compensation for such damages.” Peregrine plans to appeal, according to a statement from Ellis’ firm.

Cleburne Times Review — Cleburne, Texas:March 27, 2014

Under the terms of the agreement, “not one shovel full of dirt” can be turned in the easement area without receiving approval from Peregrine, Ellis said.

That and other factors decrease the overall value of the property, which fronts a major roadway and is zoned commercial, attorneys for the family argued.

Anyone wanting to purchase and develop the property faces additional costs in several ways because of the restrictions placed on the land by Peregrine, Ellis said, including building parking lots and bringing in utilities necessary to commercially develop the property.

Ellis said his firm is representing another Johnson County landowner in a similar case also against Peregrine, which will also be heard in County Court at Law No. 2. That case involves land close to the Eagle Ford Land parcel, but not sitting on a main thoroughfare.

SpectraBusters — Blog:March 26, 2014

“This verdict sends a strong message that pipeline easements often cause significant damages to property beyond the easement area,” says Austin-based eminent domain attorney Luke Ellis of Johns Marrs Ellis & Hodge LLP, who represented the family partnership at trial. “Unfortunately, many Texas landowners don’t realize that they have a constitutional right to seek just compensation for such damages.”

The Harbinger — Blog:March 24, 2014

Ellis said, “This verdict sends a strong message that pipeline easements often cause significant damages to property beyond the easement area.” He said two other recent Texas cases have upheld similar claims.

Star-Telegram — Fort Worth, Texas:March 24, 2014

Ellis said, “This verdict sends a strong message that pipeline easements often cause significant damages to property beyond the easement area.” He said two other recent Texas cases have upheld similar claims.

The Business Journals — Cleburne, Texas:March 24, 2014

“This verdict sends a strong message that pipeline easements often cause significant damages to property beyond the easement area,” says Austin-based eminent domain attorney Luke Ellis of Johns Marrs Ellis & Hodge LLP, who represented the family partnership at trial. “Unfortunately, many Texas landowners don’t realize that they have a constitutional right to seek just compensation for such damages.”