Keep Your Eyes on the Ebola Outbreak

It sounds simple to you because you obviously have no real understanding of how genetics can or cannot be affected through natural means. Do a little
research and then come back and maybe we'll talk. Try posting actual facts, as well, as opinions are like as&holes, everyone has one and nobody needs
2.

So even if half the village ran, only 20 people are infected. that is not even remotely a high infection rate.

You people watch too many movies.

edit on 1-8-2012 by nixie_nox because: (no reason given)

edit on 1-8-2012 by nixie_nox because: (no reason given)

I have often thought that but came to the conclusion most people love a disaster and make up a movie which plays on a loop inside their own head and
has no interrupt facililty. Hence why facts have no effect

Byaruhanga said the facility was already dilapidated when the outbreak began, citing an irregular water supply and electricity, a broken sewer system
and no medical incinerator.

Now, this is referring to the hospital in Kibaale, the Kagadi Hospital. How sad. If this weren't the case, perhaps, I think, these periodic outbreaks
would be much easier to deal with.

IN reference to another poster, I wanted to show this:

Local media reports this week said patients at the hospital had protested about the lack of food and water, and wanted to leave.

This is in conflict with the (BBC, I think it was?) reporter who said they they escaped or got or or the like. I wonder if that person was right there
or heard it second hand? Who knows. It seems like there a lot of conflicting reports right now-though thankfully, there doesn't seem to be a huge
discrepancy in numbers (14 as opposed to 16 or 18 deaths. Though in this case, I think that is due to folks reading articles from a few days ago,
maybe.)

Ah, so much doom and gloom! Seriously, I know Ebola, and in this case, Ebola-Sudan is very serious (Not the most "serious" strain, ha...ha. How
funny.) but this is not going to be the end of us. Could a big pandemic thin our ranks? Absolutely. Is it pants-pooping scary? Oh yes. It won't be
the "end of us" in any case. Real life doesn't equate to movies. (Not saying you believe that, just stating how I feel.)

When you think about it, it wouldn't even take a full-blown pandemic to wreak global havoc. Possibly because of the cinema, we have been conditioned
to fear the Ebola virus like the boogeyman. So here's a simplified scenario that doesn't examine the viral contagion possibilities.

If one person [patient0] from Uganda suddenly becomes symptomatic for Ebola while attending the Olympics in London:
1. There would be widespread panic.
2. Any kind of quarantine within London would be impossible.
3. There would be a mass exodus from London, possibly straining the infrastructure to the point of failure.
4. Some nations may panic and close their borders.
5. Other nations may quickly impose draconian testing and quarantine measures. (This sounds like the knee jerk reaction the US would have.)
6. Given the skittishness of the financial markets, fear could drive some markets down, while hoarding of resources could drive up commodity
prices.

Now that scenario is probably a worst case reaction to Ebola's second most devious characteristic: FEAR. However, it's probable that there would be
some international impact that likely would not disperse too quickly.

If you want to turn this into a really good horror story, imagine "patient0" ate dinner at a Salad Bar the night before he became fully symptomatic.
At that time, he felt rather tired and slightly feverish with a small headache.

His slight headache and fever caused him to forget to wash his hands when he left the restroom. At the salad bar he serves himself with the shared
serving utensils ubiquitous at such establishments. Other patrons after him handle the same utensils.

Patient0 is now shedding the virus in an environment that is perfect for transmission and infection. The patrons use shared utensils where infectious
agents can easily be transmitted from hand to hand. Hands are used directly in the eating process. In the case of bread, the food is often handled
directly. Oral ingestion is one of the primary means of contracting the virus.

Given the probability that the establishment is serving an international clientele, the virus now has a medium to spread worldwide. Because of the
incubation period of Ebola, the infected would not be aware of their condition until after they had returned home.

So now in addition to the fear element, there is an actual possibility of a pandemic.

If you liked this horror story, stay tuned for the sequel: "How the Ebola pandemic culled the heard!"

I personally think don't think this means that this is "all over" but I do think that it means that things are more under control...thankfully. If
the Ugandan government doesn't have it's crayons together, at least MSF/WHO/CDC does.

Joaquim Saweka, the WHO representative in Uganda, told reporters Friday that everyone known to have had contact with Ebola victims has been isolated
— a total of 176 people.

In first world countries, medications are regulated. This is not the case with medications in third world countries and it is possible to buy almost
anything over the counter, simply by walking into a pharmacy and asking for it. This includes injection-only types of medications.

Remember the bird/swine flu spread? Airports measured the body temperature of everyone boarding planes, including those who took fever reducers so
they showed no symptoms.

All it would take is one person who had been exposed with a plane ticket and enough money to buy whatever it would take to mask early-onset symptoms.
Just sayin'.

This is not necessarily true, as none of the stains that effect humans are airborn. That being said, if a mutation were to happen to Ebola Zaire or
Reston it could be very deadly to all people world wide.

Notice: I did say not necessarily, I will say it could be very dangerous, but it not being airborn makes it much easier to handle if that were to
happen.

Originally posted by rigel4
If this disease ever goes airborne.................It really is all over
for the humans.

This is not true. It would be very devastating to the human population as the strains discovered so far kill anywhere from 25% to 90% of the
population, but there are those in every strain they have found to be immune to the virus and/or successfully recover from it.

Though there is always a chance a strain could mutate to an airborn virus that has a 100% kill rate.

I'm not sure how to put this exactly, but as soon as I heard that the outbreak was in Uganda, the red flags went up. For a good part of the year,
I've been noticing all kinds of fishy things connected with that country. Kony 2012 was the big one, but there were bits and pieces here and there.
(Like when the news was reporting Nodding Sickness like crazy for a few days, when in reality its been present in Uganda for decades, and it wasn't
suddenly reaching epidemic proportions.) There've been other things, too, but I just woke up a little bit ago and can't remember them all.

I don't know what it is -- I can't put my finger on it -- but I have the feeling that either something very bad is going on in Uganda, or somebody
keeps trying to pull everyone's attention there for some reason.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.