tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7403593127821837670.post1389831389881472081..comments2018-08-14T12:24:31.807-07:00Comments on أكوا ويب - موقع شامل لرواد الويب العربي: ما خلف سطور قرار الإتحاد الأوروبي ... جوجل ستجعل نظام الأندرويد نظاما مدفوعا و غير مجاني مستقبلا ! Rida Dahhanenoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7403593127821837670.post-39753433935511120162018-07-21T02:54:53.218-07:002018-07-21T02:54:53.218-07:00In 2007, we chose to offer Android to phone makers...In 2007, we chose to offer Android to phone makers and mobile network operators for free. Of course, there are costs involved in building Android, and Google has invested billions of dollars over the last decade to make Android what it is today. This investment makes sense for us because we can offer phone makers the option of pre-loading a suite of popular Google apps (such as Search, Chrome, Play, Maps and Gmail), some of which generate revenue for us, and all of which help ensure the phone ‘just works’, right out of the box. Phone makers don’t have to include our services; and they’re also free to pre-install competing apps alongside ours. This means that we earn revenue only if our apps are installed, and if people choose to use our apps instead of the rival apps.<br />Good for partners, good for consumers<br />The free distribution of the Android platform, and of Google’s suite of applications, is not only efficient for phone makers and operators—it’s of huge benefit for developers and consumers. If phone makers and mobile network operators couldn’t include our apps on their wide range of devices, it would upset the balance of the Android ecosystem. So far, the Android business model has meant that we haven&#39;t had to charge phone makers for our technology, or depend on a tightly controlled distribution model. <br /><br />We’ve always agreed that with size comes responsibility. A healthy, thriving Android ecosystem is in everyone’s interest, and we’ve shown we’re willing to make changes. But we are concerned that today’s decision will upset the careful balance that we have struck with Android, and that it sends a troubling signal in favor of proprietary systems over open plaRida Dahhanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04184517961349919437noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7403593127821837670.post-13796818872403302482018-07-21T01:41:24.731-07:002018-07-21T01:41:24.731-07:00قرات المقالة التي وضعتها كمرجع كاملة و لا يوجد في...قرات المقالة التي وضعتها كمرجع كاملة و لا يوجد فيها اي ذكر لجعل اندرويد نظام مدفوع �� او شيء من هذا القبيل ، كيف وصل بك الامر لهذا التحليل على الرغم من انه لم يذكر اطلاقا اطلاقاHani bachihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12303193531129673872noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7403593127821837670.post-11128177988821413832018-07-20T12:57:45.714-07:002018-07-20T12:57:45.714-07:00المقال تحليلي، هذا واضح من عبارة &quot; ما خلف الس...المقال تحليلي، هذا واضح من عبارة &quot; ما خلف السطور &quot;، لا بد ان يكون كلام في كلام لا أقل و لا أكثر، بالطبع المهتمين به قد وجدوه كلاما جيدا، و من لا يهتم بالتحليل سيجده مملا . Rida Dahhanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04184517961349919437noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7403593127821837670.post-41344424076242207242018-07-20T07:43:50.015-07:002018-07-20T07:43:50.015-07:00كلام كثير ومملكلام كثير ومملUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17881023514013611166noreply@blogger.com