ByEmily Sullivan |January 9, 2018

In this new year, beer brewers are enjoying a temporary excise tax break that was signed into federal law as 2017 was winding down.

But now public health experts are saying the temporary cut could come with a big cost over the next two years. That’s because the 2018-19 tax reduction will decrease government revenue by $4.2 billion, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation — slicing into funds available to offset the public costs of excessive alcohol consumption. Those costs involve everything from traffic accidents and emergency room trips to poorer health among Medicaid recipients.

“Currently, federal and state taxes do not even come close to covering those costs,” said Dr. Timothy Naimi, author of a recent article study on state alcohol excise taxes. “Public health is a strong rationale for alcohol taxation. … If we don’t recover the costs related to alcohol sales, then it amounts to a subsidy for people who drink, and who drink excessively.”

The tax break was touted as a savior of small craft breweries. Its bipartisan sponsors said it would lead to the creation of thousands of jobs.

Leah Cheston, co-owner of Right Proper Brewing in Washington, D.C., says her business would save about $15,000 annually. Right Proper, which hopes to produce 4,200 barrels in 2018, is planning to use its tax savings for new equipment, and perhaps more labor. “The savings for us could be at least a part-time employee,” she says.

The industry is hoping Congress will make the tax change permanent.

“As a small business, everything helps,” Cheston says. So she wishes the provision were not temporary. “Being long term would give us the ability to know that we can do these projects safer.”

Cheston, like other small brewers who spoke with NPR, doesn’t think the tax break is significant enough to allow her to lower beer prices. But even if retail beer prices don’t actually fall, the tax cut could restrain price increases in coming years.

Dr. Mike Hilton, deputy director of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism’s division of epidemiology and prevention research, says taxing alcohol has been shown to benefit public health by propping up prices. “It’s an effective prevention method because it tends to lower the amount consumed,” he says.

Each year, excessive alcohol consumption causes 88,000 deaths, according to the CDC. When the cost of a drink rises by 10 percent, people drink 5 to 6 percent less, according to a study published by the NIAAA. That leads to reductions in health care costs and alcohol-related car accidents.

“When consumption goes up, the issues that you have with alcohol go up as well — like drunk driving and underaged drinking,” says J.T. Griffin, the chief government affairs officer of Mothers Against Drunk Driving. “Congress needs to look at the health consequences of alcohol … as a public health issue.”

Critics of the tax break also argue that relatively few of the benefits will go to small brewers. For example, Adam Looney, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, says that “for every $20 in excise tax cuts, about $1 will actually accrue to a craft brewer or craft distiller. The rest goes to either importers or large domestic producers.”

“The biggest changes in the bill are low excise tax rates on small production amounts,” Looney says. “On the face, it looks like it will only benefit small producers. … But there are new technical changes to how beer can be distributed and sold, which allow large producers to essentially pass off their products as craft, and get the low rate.”

Ultimately, he says, “overwhelming benefit actually goes to large producers. In some ways, it increases the competition that true craft brewers will face.”

Whether or not the new tax break is a good idea, lobbyists are trying to make sure it is permanent. Anheuser-Busch, which produces Bud Light, Budweiser and Shock Top, hired 19 lobbying firms in addition to its in-house lobbyists to work on the company’s tax issues in 2017.

Maya MacGuineas, president of the bipartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, says the two-year tax break is a good example of why lobbying work is expanding in Washington.

“It’s a real way that money gets into politics,” she says of the temporary tax change. “You see lobbyists gearing up, trying to protect their favorite tax break.”

Copyright 2018 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

Recent Posts

As Pennsylvania moves into the latter part of winter, 13,500 households that started the season without a safe source of heat still don’t have one. Data released Wednesday by Pennsylvania’s Public Utility Commission shows there are fewer homes without a utility heating service this winter compared to last year.

An environmental group says that Pennsylvania’s gas drilling industry is releasing much more methane into the atmosphere than the state is reporting. Scientists at the Environmental Defense Fund calculated Pennsylvania’s Marcellus shale industry is emitting twice as much methane as companies are reporting to the state’s Department of Environmental Protection.

KEYSTONE CROSSROADS - Pennsylvania’s congressional map has been recognized nationally as having some of the starkest examples of gerrymandering in the country, prompting both a state and a federal lawsuit in 2017. A three-judge panel in the federal case upheld the map as drawn by Republicans in 2011.

HARRISBURG, PA (WSKG) -- The deadline has come and gone to submit congressional map proposals that meet the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's new guidelines. When justices first declared the maps unconstitutional about four weeks ago, they ordered the GOP-controlled legislature and Democratic Governor Tom Wolf to negotiate a compromise on new ones.

Albany, NY (WSKG) - Some Democratic lawmakers are pushing for a measure that would make anonymous political ads on Facebook and other social media illegal. They say the ads are being abused to falsely represent their positions on issues.

About WSKG

WSKG connects you to local and global news and the arts online, on the radio, and on TV.