If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Well the best score that I see in MadOnions website is 8420Mraks This score was with the GF3 OCed to 285/594 core/mem and the P4 OCed to 2312Mhz The link that I posted shows that the system had a none OCed GF3 and it is also using PC1600 ram not PC2100 If the people had tweaked it little more they would have killed this system You can just search for your self at the MadOnion wesite One more thing to all of the Intel lovers How soon will you be able to get a P4 that runns at 2300Mhz How about the Palomino 1500Mhz????

Originally posted by miha76:I bet owners of thoes first fiwe scores in 3DMark data base have short **** problem......

BTW my score would be oround 1000 if not lower with, old SLOT A Tbird 700@900 and Voodoo 5.

So what my friend here is saying is that the 30% OCed GF3 and it's pure higher clocked T&L is the main reason that the P4 has that 1400Mark advantage hahahahahha again ahhahahaha O boy one more month and I will Have that 1.5Ghz Palomino with GF3 if not RADEON2

"GF3 that is OCed 30% higher"
"owners of thoes first fiwe scores in 3DMark data base have short **** problem......"
It is always some excuse. The question was, "Have you seen anything this high before?" And yes we have, it just wasn't from AMD. If AMD can't produce higher clocked chips who problem is that? We're talking the BEST chip from either company and obviously the P4 beats out the Athlon in 3DMark2001. I'd suggest picking another benchmark to show off an AMD system because 3DMark2001 isn't AMDs bench.