A Christmas Message from “Rev. Duck”

Posting Policy:We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

39 thoughts on “A Christmas Message from “Rev. Duck””

http://youtu.be/CJvwpufbLyM
Duck Dynasty = A&E = Hearst Corp./ABC Disney = Patty Hearst
The Leftist Corporate Establishment has turned 'Duck Dynasty' into the 'Second Coming'
and Phil Robertson into 'The Messiah'. They are calling 'the Ducks'. 'The Ducks' (in this case)
are today's Unwashed American masses, never taught how to reason effectively or think for themselves.
Can't find a decent, well-paying job? All the good ones exported offshore? What can you create with your hands?
Of course the are gone! In our Global Economy, multi-national corporations set up shop where the talent is. It's not here.
Thank both Democrats and Republicans. Long ago they joined forces & sold us out! Noble Experiment's over, gone,kaput!
Legendary American 'Know-How' & 'Get-Up-And-Go' got up and went. "Will the last one to leave please turn off the lights?"

And in reference to the LGBT community, he quoted:
“Women with women, men with men, they committed indecent acts with one another, and they received in themselves the due penalty for their perversions. They’re full of murder, envy, strife, hatred. They are insolent, arrogant, God-haters. They are heartless, they are faithless, they are senseless, they are ruthless. They invent ways of doing evil. That’s what you have 235 years, roughly, after your forefathers founded the country.”

Shane — was St. Paul a bigot? He is paraphrasing Paul's letter to the Romans, 1:18 – 32. If you can't accept the Bible as God's word — his message to humanity for all time — then you are a very sad, hopeless creature.

I don't think you'll get very far with your anti-Christian bigotry here Shane. Why not be more fruitful with your time and protest the dictionary publishers inclusion of such bigoted words as "perverted, " "depraved", "sodomy" and the worst of them all, – "decency" and "morality".

BIGOT – A person who holds BLINDLY and intolerantly to a particular creed, OPINION, etc. 2 a narrow minded person.

Y'll know that Phil's Bible also says that "if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him", right? Most of the men in that family have long hair, even if you disregard their beards. You can't pick and choose what to stand for.

The passage which you failed to cite refers to tresses of hair in the Greek, as in long styled hair like women do.

You demonstrate laughable historical ignorance if you actually think that in any way, shape, or form applies to a man's beard.

But you are correct that if a man styles his hair long in the way of women, that is a Biblical offense, albeit a minor one. Feel free to show us which of the Robertson men actually wears their hair in the style of a woman, $50 says you can't.

* Appealing to the Greek assumes too much; the simple translation is adequate.
* I explicitly excluded their beards.
* Several have shoulder-length hair, similar to a woman's. Do you require a man to *intend* to appear feminine? Are you suggesting that a woman with curly, shoulder-length hair is wearing it "in the style of a man"?
* Send $50 as dogecoin to D0823947uiofhs8943hro8

jesus is a solar deity and composite of many other deities constructed by the jews to overthrow their roman oppressors, it worked pretty damn good.
the holy spirit lives , the jesus myth must die…goddamn it!

"Appealing to the Greek assumes too much; the simple translation is adequate."

Wrong again, the English translation is not adequate. Simple long hair is not condemned. It has to be in the style of a woman. FYI, Paul spoke Greek not English.

"I explicitly excluded their beards."

False, you only conditionally excluded beards. Here are your exact words…"even if you disregard their beards." Even if Thumper is a conditional exclusion. That demonstrated you don't know what you are talking about. The Bible Greek is clear that beards are unconditionally excluded. FYI, woman don't grow beards.

"Several have shoulder-length hair, similar to a woman's. Do you require a man to *intend* to appear feminine?"

Shoulder length doesn't cut it. You need to show style tresses of hair, still waiting for pictures of a Robertson man with styled hair. Intent doesn't matter, the style has to look like a woman's style.

"Are you suggesting that a woman with curly, shoulder-length hair is wearing it "in the style of a man"?'

Notice how Thumper desperately tries to change the subject, he is trying to evade my exposing his error and historical ignorance. We both know how woman style their hair Thumper, so now you need to show which of the Robertson men style their hair like a woman. Go ahead, we are still waiting.

"Send $50 as dogecoin to D0823947uiofhs8943hro8"

Thumper accepts my challenge, but has yet to show us any Roberson men wearing a woman's hair style. If he doesn't, he owes me $50.

Since a nutjob posted in between your reply and mine Thumper, I will re-post my latest refutation of your claim here one more time to make sure you see it.

"Appealing to the Greek assumes too much; the simple translation is adequate."

Wrong again, the English translation is not adequate. Simple long hair is not condemned. It has to be in the style of a woman. FYI, Paul spoke Greek not English.

"I explicitly excluded their beards."

False, you only conditionally excluded beards. Here are your exact words…"even if you disregard their beards." "Even if" Thumper, is a conditional exclusion. That demonstrated you don't know what you are talking about. The Bible Greek is clear that beards are unconditionally excluded. FYI, woman don't grow beards.

"Several have shoulder-length hair, similar to a woman's. Do you require a man to *intend* to appear feminine?"

Shoulder length doesn't cut it. You need to show style tresses of hair, still waiting for pictures of a Robertson man with styled hair. Intent doesn't matter, the style has to look like a woman's style.

"Are you suggesting that a woman with curly, shoulder-length hair is wearing it "in the style of a man"?'

Notice how Thumper desperately tries to change the subject, he is trying to evade my exposing his error and historical ignorance. We both know how woman style their hair Thumper, so now you need to show which of the Robertson men style their hair like a woman. Go ahead, we are still waiting.

"Send $50 as dogecoin to D0823947uiofhs8943hro8"

Thumper accepts my challenge, but has yet to show us any Roberson men wearing a woman's hair style. If he doesn't, he owes me $50.

Jewus. I feel sorry for you. I died. On a.hospital. table and hit. The 5 minute mark. . I saw. Life don’t end. I found myself back in pain in my body. With. A young black Guy with.a body. Bag and a young female.cleaning up.the blood and mess. All doctors and staff. Gone. They was called back.bit most gone home then. Jesus is. no.Meath . Man didn’t create. .nothing but messes. All this documented. For.legal man’s. Pruposes. They lost. But God was not done with. Me. You.atless. believe science don’t. You. It happened where you. Like it or not.

Actually, Mike, I do. I've known for a long time, and definitions are so very easy to find.

1) a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas, etc. : a bigoted person; especially : a person who hates or refuses to accept the members of a particular group (such as a racial or religious group)

2) a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

That is the definition of Phil Robertson, and most so-called evangelical "Christians". Phil falls into category 1. Evangelicals, or "extremists", tend to fall into category 2.

Yes, he did paraphrase that part of Romans. St. Paul, if you read the entire passage, said God let them do what they will and made no judgments about them. Paul did the judging, where he had no right to judge. Matthew 7:1 – "Judge not, that ye be not judged." Paul clearly had his own opinions about things, and guess what? Sometimes people's opinions are wrong, or just don't matter.

The Bible is Man's word, not God's. It was created by men, translated and re-translated and mis-translated hundreds of times. What's so hard about just being a good person? Why do you feel the need to belittle and berate others? Live and let live – persecution is for the wicked.

"Yes, he did paraphrase that part of Romans. St. Paul, if you read the entire passage, said God let them do what they will and made no judgments about them. Paul did the judging, where he had no right to judge. Matthew 7:1 – "Judge not, that ye be not judged." Paul clearly had his own opinions"

If anyone is curious as to what Shane is doing here, I will use his own words to describe it…

"The Bible…mis-translated hundreds of times."

It takes a lot of mistranslation before the Bible can mean what Shane claims it means.

"Why do you feel the need to belittle and berate others?"

There are literally dozens and dozens of comments on this website of Shane belittling and berating others. That would make him a hypocrite, except that he is too much of a narcissist and solipsist to be that self-aware.

I am bigoted towards the following:NAMBALA-Adults who abduct children for sexual pleasure, Polyamerism-Group living for sexual benifits w/ 3 to 5 others demanding others to equal it to marriage, Yale University protecting sex with animals as OK, Muslim men commiting female genital mutilation. These are all in the diversity group w/ LGBT.
You need to include all diversity. Its impossible to commit bigotry when morals, virtues and decency is the premise for pointing destructive behavior. I am free of ever being a bigot..its a freeing feeling. Thank the Lord.