I agree, base64Binary is missing from the Baseline. I'll add it, but a
disk problem wiped out my wsdl-xslt completely, (no backup, doh!) and so
I'm recreating from scratch. Lost a couple of days work there...
Anyway, I'll check in updated baselines as my recovery progresses (about
half fixed now). Youenn, I think if you remove xs:anySimpleType, you
will be 100%.
________________________________
From: Arthur Ryman [mailto:ryman@ca.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 8:30 AM
To: Youenn Fablet
Cc: Jonathan Marsh; www-ws-desc@w3.org; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Subject: Re: Some new interchange results
***********************
Warning: Your file, cm-canonresults.zip, contains more than 32 files
after decompression and cannot be scanned.
***********************
Youenn,
Thx for updating your results.
anySimpleType is not a built-in type. It is an ur type [1]
base64Binary is a built-in primitive type so it must be included. If
it's missing, that's a bug.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#built-in-datatypes
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca
Youenn Fablet <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
05/16/2006 10:54 AM
To
www-ws-desc@w3.org
cc
Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
Subject
Some new interchange results
***********************
Warning: Your file, cm-canonresults.zip, contains more than 32 files
after decompression and cannot be scanned.
***********************
Hi all,
I just looked at the interchange results and thought some simple fixes
might improve our implementation results.
Please find attached some new results. This time, I dumped all parsed
components and not only the ones visible from the top-level description
component. This improves a lot the results 8-)
I tried the comparison tools, which are actually very cool, thanks a lot
for all the good work, jonathan :-)
I just noticed that some of the canonical interchange documents do not
include base64Binary and/or anySimpleType in the type definitions. This
seems to be the biggest (if not the only one) difference between the
canonical results and these results.
Is there any reason not too dump these two simple types ?
Regards,
Youenn