The paper’s standards Editor Phil Corbett told Off the Record, “I would not describe it as inconsistency; we are making case-by-case judgments, based on newsworthiness, context and other factors. In the case of Pussy Riot, it involved a major international news story, and the name was reported ubiquitously. It would have been impractical and probably counterproductive to try to avoid the name. On the other hand, a brief reference to one obscure band is a different situation. Plenty of bands these days choose names in part for shock value, and we don’t necessarily feel obligated to print them.”

Seems like a fair assumption that Pussy Riot also chose their name “in part for shock value,” but we get what he’s driving at. Any of you young upstarts hoping to just force the Times to say “pussy” for kicks have another thing coming. You’ll have to take that routine to publications that’ve already debased themselves to your level. Like this one.