Light generates time by being slightly "slowed down" via interaction with matter/magnetic fields/etc... With the increased entropy (closer to equilibrium/death) that comes with age, our ability to slow down light/time also diminishes. See how an hour seems to last forever when we're kids, while time "just flies" when we get older. Find a way to slow down light more efficiently in your biology, and you will create more time... or at least dilate or slow down what you have still available in your reservoirs

On the other hand (there's a flip-side to the coin), when we are asleep, preferably in complete darkness (absence of light), time doesn't behave like it does during daylight/waking hours. We can even live a whole lifetime in "dream-time" that lasts only a few seconds in "normal" time. Upon waking up from sleep, we're all a bit time-scrambled. This phenomenon is much more pronounced when waking up from general anesthesia, for example.

The OP'er doesnt mind. Nothing else in my life is organized, why should me threads be any different

Originally Posted by Andro

Light generates time by being slightly "slowed down" via interaction with matter/magnetic fields/etc... With the increased entropy...

I think with your connection of Fulcanelli's end of time and entropy you were speaking about the maximum expansion of the universe.

Here you seem to speak about the decay of our bodies when you are talking about entropy. But I guess in the end, it doesn't really matter if it's about the one or the other, right?

Those are interesting connections imo. Are they written in that book as well, or do you have access to some kind of unpublished other data? I recognize a certain consistency in nomenclature, that's why I'm suspecting either the one or the other.

I think with your connection of Fulcanelli's end of time and entropy you were speaking about the maximum expansion of the universe.

No, I don't think I ever mentioned such an expansion.

Originally Posted by Florius Frammel

Those are interesting connections imo. Are they written in that book as well, or do you have access to some kind of unpublished other data? I recognize a certain consistency in nomenclature, that's why I'm suspecting either the one or the other.

Neither. Let's just say I have been intensely studying the phenomenon of light for quite some time