The Anglobitch Thesis contends that the brand of feminism that arose in the Anglosphere (the English-speaking world) in the 1960s has an ulterior misandrist (anti-male) agenda quite distinct from its self-proclaimed role as ‘liberator’ of women.

Tuesday, 11 December 2018

Why has misandrist
feminism been so successful in Anglophone countries? This question has begun to
haunt me. Too many anti-feminists use conspiracy theories to explain the rise
of misandrist Anglo feminism. While there have certainly been a number of
social, political and religious groups promoting feminist agendas, their
writings would never have achieved mass or institutional support if such support
did not already exist. The Frankfurt School and other pro-feminist intellectual
movements can only flourish if the social soil is already receptive to their
message. For example, the Frankfurt School only adopted an infiltration agenda
when its calls for a proletarian revolution failed in affluent post-War North
America. There is also the issue of institutional compliance. Some nations or
cultural blocs have pre-existing institutions which are especially ripe for
subversion. For example, the Anglo-American Common Law legal system has proved
incredibly susceptible to feminist manipulation in recent years. Similarly,
existing historical memes or traditions can hinder or facilitate subversive agendas;
and one of these is my topic here.

A former
corrections officer gave us an extended essay in which he argued that the
distinctive cultural heritage of the Anglosphere countries had a major role in
the emergence of misandrist feminism. His view was that Anglo feminism exploits
the residual resistance of former subject races in post-colonial Anglo
countries to lever outrageous and unwarranted privilege for entitled white
women.

While this
assessment is accurate enough, I have begun to detect another pro-feminist
dynamic in the colonial legacy. This is kind of residual racist puritanism
deriving from a distinctive Anglo-Saxon obsession with limiting the
reproductive fecundity of 'subject' races or classes. It is no surprise that this
obsession is strongest in the Anglo countries with a troubled colonial past
built on slavery and genocide, such as Australia or the United States. After
all, those nations had most to gain by regulating or limiting the reproductive
fecundity of slaves and ‘subject’ races.

Aboriginal Heads on Display

This realization
came to me from free discussions with Hondo Solomon, an insightful black
American writer who teaches the virtues of polygamy. In his view, the
Anglo-Saxon obsession with imposing sexual repression on subject peoples is
largely to keep their numbers low, thereby minimizing the threat of revolt. In
addition, Hondo also claims that Anglo-puritan monogamy was also promoted to
keep subject populations at a low genetic standard by deliberately preventing
the natural proliferation of alpha genes for leadership and intelligence: a
kind of soft dysgenics.Judging by the
hunchbacked, autistic morons inhabiting English towns and cities, this policy
has proved fairly effective in the British Isles – its original testing-ground.
Hondo also claims that the American obsession with professional sports also
derives from its colonial legacy – the obsessive measurement of physical
attributes and performance originating in the slave trade.

Wingspan: The American Sports Fixation

Returning to The
Anglobitch Thesis, if we focus on the sexual elements of Anglo-American colonialism we see
a ubiquitous and concerted attempt to associate religious guilt with sex among
subject populations. We also see a determined attempt to replace religions
which celebrate reproductive fecundity (voodoo, Islam, Catholicism, Judaism and
Hinduism) with guilt-laden Anglican Christianity and its sickly cult of
reproductive sterility. Let us note that this insidious campaign is colour
blind: it oppresses Highland Scots or the English lower classes as much as is
does Black Americans, Aryan Hindus or Black Africans. Wherever he goes the
patrician Anglo-American tries to impose his woman-worship, guilt and latent
homosexuality with one goal in mind: to limit subject populations’ numbers and
genetic quality, thereby reducing the threat of revolt against his rule.

Even though its
original inspiration has long gone, the same repressive spirit persists as a
habitualresidue in all Anglosphere countries. Moreover, it is one of the
residual memes that has contributed most to the rapid rise of sex-negative
misandrist feminism across the Anglosphere. As usual, Anglo-feminism draws
strength and succour from the very forces it claims to oppose.

Anglofoids enjoy Lynching

Anglo feminism has
nurtured a racist seed since its very inception, so such an alignment should
come as no surprise when we consider the colonial origins and uses of
Anglo-American Puritanism. Lynchings and other Anglo-American race-crimes
typically represented a working collusion between early feminists and imperialists, typically framed as a hysterical campaign to ‘protect’ exalted
white women from the animal lusts of black slaves. This sexual Nazism still
contaminates Anglo feminism, albeit at an unstated and subliminal level
(consider feminist Reclaim the Night marches through black areas, which covertly
assume that all black men are rapists). Of course, inculcating the colonising
race with puritanical values also serves the colonial enterprise by inhibiting
interbreeding with subject peoples, with obvious benefits for the colonial
project. It is far harder to maintain a colonial culture of exploitation when
many of the exploited share genes from the colonising race. The ‘Pretty White
Girl Syndrome’ which saturates the Anglo media is entirely dedicated to
exalting white Anglo girls as unattainable deities beyond all reproach; surely another
warped legacy of colonial Anglo-elitism.

Too Good for You: Anglofoid Sexual Elitism

My thought has
reached a crucial impasse on the issue of sex-negative, misandrist Anglo
feminism. It is no longer enough to consider the Anglosphere’s puritanical
religious heritage the only force underpinning the Anglo-feminist agenda. Other
countries have a strong Protestant tradition (Holland, Germany, Denmark) yet
still lack sex-negative feminism of the Anglosphere variety. Other factors must
underlie misandrist Anglo-feminism, while sustaining its agenda. Obviously,
malleable Common Law is one of these; other prime candidates are genetics,
empirical machine values, homosociality and class distinction.

However, the
post-colonial dynamic also serves and abets Anglo-American feminism, as we have
seen. Its legacy gives Anglo feminism its distinctive racist, misandrist and
sex-negative character, especially in those countries where colonial oppression
was strongest.

Saturday, 24 November 2018

Relampago Furioso has just published an excellent article on the state of the Anglosphere. In this cutting piece, he argues that the Anglo-American world is now peopled by the exalted Anglobitch on one side and the exploited Anglocuck on the other. The Anglocuck is defined as a deluded sucker who continues to 'buy into' antiquated fables about his cultural and social superiority even while being a sexually-disenfranchised, disposable wage slave. He cultivates Sexual False Consciousness to cope with his degraded condition, kidding himself with unattainable fantasies of sexual salvation. Too dumb to see that his own culture's puritanical exaltation of women is the root cause of his cuckdom, he only defends it with ever greater vigour:

Anglocuck: Totally emasculated male provider unit turned exploited serf on the tax
farm. Easily deceived by women, invaders, and politicians this male
pushover still believes in America even though its ruling class threw
him overboard 50 years ago. The Anglocuck thinks voting will fix his
problems and you’ll find him obsessing over politics on social media
sites which increasingly limit what he can say to defend himself while
the culture at large paints him and his vision of America farther and
farther into a corner. The sad sack Anglocuck believes his innate reason
and rationality will win him friends, even though to his enemies these
“virtues” only demonstrate how gullible he is. Obsessively plays by the
rules that have been stacked against him, happily supports his own
demise by showing up to work on time, paying his taxes, and saving for
“retirement” so that others can benefit from his productivity which is
forcefully taken from him by a behemoth government. Remains the loyal
“company man” even though the company was long ago sold to a corporate
conglomerate that doesn’t care if he falls on the floor dead. Frequent
masturbator and sexless wonder who begs for leftovers from well-worn
carousel specimens, while the Anglobitch brazenly cucks him with other
men (especially invaders and those that mock the Anglocuck) then sends
him the bill for her subsequent offspring.

While this is a definitive description of the Anglocuck, a quick scout around the Internet suggests the meme is actually quite well-developed. Compiling the following list of articles, I was struck by a total lack of acknowledgement. Although my own writings are more-or-less the starting point for this strand of manosphere thought, my name is never once mentioned. But then, as Ghengis Khan once said of his own people: 'They will wear the finest
clothes, embrace the fairest women and rule between sunrise and sunset - yet they will forget the man to whom they owe everything.'

Sunday, 4 November 2018

It can be horribly gratifying to be proven right. Yet in the wake of another incel shooting by Scott Beierle, it is obvious that many of my worst predictions about the Anglosphere are coming to pass. With the rise of misandrist feminism in the English-speaking world (but especially North America and Britain), males are being placed under unprecedented and unreasonable pressure. A toxic combination of residual sex-negative puritanism, rabid woman-worship, fraying economic status, sexual false consciousness, traditional expectations, sexual disenfranchisement and good ol' Anglo-American aversion to reality have conspired to produce some of the most tormented males in history.

I knew Beierle was an incel shooter the instant I heard about events in Florida. The fact that the two fatalities were middle-class white females and that the shooter was a single white male rendered his motivations almost self-apparent:

Tallahassee: The man police say killed two women at a
Florida yoga studio before turning the gun on himself expressed
deep-seated misogyny that he said was caused by repeated rejections from
women with whom he tried to engage romantically.

Scott Beierle,
40, shot six people and pistol-whipped another after walking into the
yoga studio on the second floor of a shopping plaza on Friday night. He
killed a Florida State University student and a faculty member before
shooting himself, police said.

Police
said Saturday that they were investigating what prompted the shooting,
but a series of videos he posted to the internet in 2014 paint the
picture of an apparent "incel," or someone who had been involuntarily
celibate, with a seething rage against women.

Beierle had been
arrested twice in the past six years by the university’s police,
according to criminal records. The first time was in 2012. He was
charged with trespassing in 2014 and told he was banned from campus
after following an FSU volleyball coach into a gym.

The same year he was detained again for trespassing in a dining hall.
Charges were dismissed for both of Beierle’s university arrests, but he
agreed to a plea deal after a final arrest by Tallahassee police in
2016.

According to a police report, he was
living in an off-campus apartment in his late 30s – noticeably older
than the other residents – and one day offered to put lotion on a
19-year-old sunbathing by the pool. When the woman declined, she told
police, Beierle ‘‘slapped her butt, and grabbed it and then shook it’’.

Beierle
posted 15 videos in a span of three days in August 2014. Some have
since been deleted. In one video, "The American Whore Pt. 2," he
discusses potential forms of "appropriate" punishment for promiscuous
women.

"I would vote for crucifixion myself," he said. "The most heinous crime warrants the most heinous punishment."

In
another video, titled "The Rebirth of my Misogynism," Beierle says that
his hatred for women started in eighth grade, when he discovered the
"collective treachery" of girls his age. He lists the names of several
girls who he said sparked his misogyny.

He
said his feelings toward women went dormant until he went to college at
Florida State University, when women already in relationships gave him
their phone numbers and one woman called the police on him for visiting
her at work.

"Again,
this mentality (of) 'let's just run to the authorities when our
feelings are hurt,'" he said. "I had committed no wrong. I was just
trying to court this particular female."

He also mentions one romantic interest from his college years who he said would repeatedly cancel planned dates.

"I
could've ripped her head off," he said. "The treachery that a female is
capable of when her sensibilities are offended to me is astonishing.
The lengths that they will go to - lying, exaggerating, outright lying."

Beierle,
who served in the military and was a Florida State University (FSU)
graduate, had been arrested in 2012 and 2016 on charges of grabbing
women's buttocks at an apartment complex pool and at a campus dining
hall. He was charged with trespassing in 2014 and told he was banned
from campus after following an FSU volleyball coach into a gym.

His
victims were 21-year-old Maura Binkley, a student at FSU, and
61-year-old Dr. Nancy Vessem, a faculty member and the chief medical
director for a health maintenance organisation. Witnesses told police
that Beierle posed as a customer to gain access to the yoga studio,
which was in session when he started firing, according to the Associated
Press. Police have not yet disclosed what kind of gun Beierle used.

"Malevolence
can idle or it can manifest itself into something," he said in one
video. "I believe in karma. I believe in what comes around goes around.
And those that engage in treachery will ultimately be the victims of
it."

Beierle, who posted videos under the
pseudonym Scott Carnifex, also criticises the societal "expectations" of
male adolescents in America, who he said are programmed into believing
that sexual conquests are intrinsically linked to manliness.

"I'd
like to send a message now to the adolescent males ... that are in the
position, the situation, the disposition of Elliot Roger [sic], of not
getting any, no love, no nothing," Beierle said in one video,
referencing the 22-year-old mass murderer who also expressed frustration
at being a virgin and being rejected by attractive women.

"This endless wasteland that breeds this longing and this frustration. That was me, certainly as an adolescent."

After Rodger's killings in 2014, he was idolised online by members of the so-called "incel" community. Rodgers
killed six people and injured fourteen others near the campus of
University of California, Santa Barbara, before killing himself. He had
also expressed frustration at being a virgin and being rejected by
attractive women.

One
Rodger supporter was Alek Minassian, the 25-year-old man accused of
plowing his van into a crowd in Toronto in April, killing 10. Minassian
declared the ‘‘incel Rebellion’’ had begun. Beierle also expressed his hatred for African-Americans, whom he called "disgusting."

In
one such video, titled "Dreadlocks are the Black Man's Mullet," Beierle
lists six reasons why he hates African-Americans and their "thuggery"
while repeatedly using racial slurs. He said dreadlocks were considered
"vogue" only among the "gutter of our society," and he said the
hairstyle made it "tough for me to still remain an NFL fan," referencing
the National Football League.

He also rails against "mongrelisation" and interracial dating, calling black women "ugly, disgusting."

In
other videos, Beierle also expresses a hatred for the police, the
"expectations" for adolescent males in America and the "dangers of
diversity."

"I
don't think a female can ever understand the societal pressure that's
put on an adolescent male to unburden himself of this stigma that has
society has put on him, this virginity burden and having a girlfriend,"
he said. "I wish I had someone to talk to me at that age."

Sydney Morning Herald, 04/11//2018

Just one way out of impossible demands.

At 40, Beierle was the perfect age for an incel shooter: an older Millennial trapped in the contradictory expectations placed on males by pan-Anglosphere post-feminist secular misandry, there was no solution to his torment beyond murder and suicide. As he himself opined, the informal pressure on adolescent males to be sexually successful (as measured by sexual activity with sexualized young women) is incredibly intense; male virgins are seen as impotent, deviant losers (not least by women themselves, albeit at an unstated level). Sexual false consciousness - the fantasy that women are roaming around wanting sex with everybody - raises this pressure to unnatural levels: most young males still believe everyone but themselves is having sex with models all day. At the same time, Anglo-American males are castigated by 'progressive' social elements (including feminism) for any kind of sexual self-expression. This programme even involves encouraging males to 'transition' into transexual pseudo-women.

Need for Empowerment? Beierle posing with swords

Of course, other factors help explain the typical demographics of incel shooters: white, conservative and middle class. Obviously, affluent white males have a residual sense of personal sovereignty which derives from earlier phases of Anglo-American society, making them prone to revolt against their eroding status. However, since Anglo feminism is an obviously 'white' movement, white men also bear the specific brunt of feminist contempt and ridicule. This is why their targets are usually white, middle-class women - the true authors of institutional misandry in Anglo-American culture.

Predictable targets: white, advantaged and female

With an Anglo-American cultural establishment eager to advance women's rights (but not their obligations) at the expense of beleaguered white males in every situation, the stage is set for incel shootings to become a daily occurrence in North America. Couple this with mass male sexual disenfranchisement, institutionalised misandry, female hyper-hypergamy and the secular-puritanical denial of normal sexual needs, and the way ahead is clear to see.

Wednesday, 17 October 2018

Regular readers will know that
misandrist Anglo-American feminism draws much of its power from the malleable Common Law
legal system which prevails in most English-speaking countries. The following account from the Red Ice website shows just how pro-female that system now is, especially
against males of low socio-economic status. However, like most White
Nationalists, the journalist author predictably fails to blame the real culprit - Anglo culture itself
- for these transgressions:

One of the county bar associations
in Pennsylvania asked me to write a summary and analysis of major recent cases
on “Protection From Abuse” orders and the means whereby these orders are signed
by defendants. They were concerned that almost 97% of these were signed by the
defendant without a hearing even though it means the loss of his home, children
and most of his income. It is often treated as a criminal conviction though it
is only a civil case. I was shocked by not only the laws and case law
concerning these orders, but the tricks that are used to force men, especially
the poor, to sign them without argument.

This assignment required me to
interview men at these hearings and ask them about their motivations. In late
2015, I went to the county courthouse and asked the defendants their story.
They were overjoyed that finally, someone was willing to listen to them. They
were almost all very poor males and none had lawyers defending them. I was
surprised that they didn’t know the difference between civil and criminal law
or that judicial proceedings were public. They were not guaranteed a lawyer
because these are civil cases, but they were all convinced regardless that it
is a criminal trial.

On the other hand, the women are
granted a free lawyer (on permanent retainer for life) and are actually dressed
up by the feminist group supplying them. They are given lines to memorize and
all are told to cry on the stand. However, it is very rare that they ever get
that far. Many defense attorneys are loathe to challenge the local feminists.

I struck up a conversation with a
very young-looking man, poorly dressed, wearing a terrified, pale expression.
He looked like he was about to vomit. He was all alone and seemed younger than
18. He must have just come from his shop because he was wearing greasy work
clothes and he had clearly made no preparations of any kind for his court date.

I approached him and asked if he
was OK. He told me that he and his girlfriend just had a baby. Tiring of him,
she issued a PFA against him without cause, warning or warrant. No evidence is
required for these in the state of Pennsylvania. The day after it was issued,
her new boyfriend moved in to his house. The restraining order forced him to
pay $750 each month in child support or face prison. His ex quit her job and
now both partners live off his forced support. When I asked what he makes here
in a month, he say “about $850 or so before taxes.”

Worse, his ex-girlfriend now gets a
free lawyer, free and unobstructed access to all social services (she cannot be
turned down for welfare programs), and free weekly counseling. If his ex had
any moral qualms about what she had done, there are a battery of counselors
there to justify it and give their official sanction to her “act of self
defense.” This young man was too small to be a threat to anyone but the most
anorexic. I refused to believe he had done anything wrong, especially when he
told me there was no criminal case concurrent to this.

I discovered that when a woman
claims she was assaulted by her mate, police are constrained to arrest
regardless of probable cause. The condition of bail is always that he cannot
return to his home and he cannot have any contact with the “victim.” He is
presumed guilty. The question arose: if this is the condition of bail, why use
the PFA? If this woman had been assaulted, why not get him arrested? The answer
was clear: that the young man never hurt a soul. A criminal case requires
evidence, unlike a PFA. A criminal case will at least guarantee him a minimum
of state-sponsored legal assistance. Furthermore, a PFA can contain a support
order as well, meaning that a woman can pad her income merely by making this
claim without evidence. Worse, her victim must pay all court costs and no cost
can accrue to the claimant by law. Almost always, she never needs to testify or
face cross-examination.

All manner of trickery is used to
get the ignorant victim, usually a man never before in trouble, to sign and
accept his fate. In Indiana County PA, it is common, for example, for the local
feminist “victim advocacy” organization to use blackmail. They tell the
terrified man that they will not leak this case to his employer if he just
signs the PFA without a hearing.

Elsewhere, he’s told that he can
sign it “without admission of guilt,” implying that a PFA is tantamount to a
criminal conviction. Of course, no guilt is assumed regardless, as this is a
civil matter and has no (official) punitive purpose. It is a rhetorical trick
to ensure their client never needs to testify. Quite literally, the woman does
not need to spend a penny or life a finger to destroy her mate’s life, assure
herself an income, receive endless sympathy and control the behavior of her ex.
She becomes a member of a noble class that has immediate access to all social
welfare, highly motivated and specialized legal representation and weekly free
counseling that exists solely to justify her actions.

It is men who pass these laws and
it is men who justify them. This proves that women rule absolutely. When men
pass these laws even they realize that they might well be the victim of them,
female rule is complete and without historical precedent. A man is not secure
in his home or in his property if a women is living with him. Muscular,
powerful women, when attacked by weaker men, are seen as helpless victims.

This is just one example of not
merely female dominance, but their utter irresponsible totalitarian domination
of men. Women live almost a decade longer than men. They control almost all
personal (that is, disposable) wealth, and are now almost 60% of all college
graduates. Even wealthy women are automatically promoted and hired through
affirmative action. Women suffer about 5% of all work related fatalities or
accidents. They are victims of only 30% of all violent crimes. Men are
sentenced far more harshly then women for the same crime in the justice system
at all levels. Two-thirds of all health care dollars are spent on women. Men,
unsurprisingly, almost all white, commit 90% of all suicides.

Feminism as an ideology does not
demand power, it is a manifestation of power long institutionalized. It is a
means to maintain power. The question here is why did feminism emerge when it
did as a dominant ideological force unchallenged in academia. Female academics
are often absurdly ignorant. This is not because they are inherently idiots,
but because they have no need or incentive to study. The better looking the
woman, the more privilege she receives. She can walk into any cocktail party,
sit down, cross her legs and hold court: dozens of men will be there fighting
one another to give her money and jobs.

We don’t see feminism in the Roman
Empire, Egypt or Ming China. Why did feminism develop? The reason is that
capitalism required wages to fall. Feminism came into existence at the same
time as immigration laws were relaxed. This was also the height of union power
and the zenith of male wages in the US. American males, from the capitalist
point of view, were doing too well. Capitalism created feminism, “anti-racism”
and mass immigration. It served their interest in obvious ways, but the
clearest and most fundamental way was to lower labor costs and discourage
cooperation.

The example of the Pennsylvania
“Domestic Violence” laws above is considered mild by national standards. It is
proof beyond doubt that the US is a violent gynocracy. It is proof that women,
especially if they are attractive and not too obese, are an aristocracy with
more power than any that ever existed. The question, however, is where did it
come from? How did such an absurd view get the support of all elites and both
parties?

Women as the New Nobility, Red Ice, 04/07/16

The article predictably concludes that misandrist feminism is a leftist conspiracy
cooked up by corporate America to suppress wages and living standards. However,
the real source of Anglo-American institutional misandry and gynocentrism arises from the
intersection of two things: Anglo-Saxon Puritanism and feminism. Alone, these
things are not calamitous; but when they make contact the result is female deification, male ostracism and social
destruction. A good analogy for this process would be a light bulb and a
battery linked in a simple circuit. Before the circuit is closed, there is no
tangible effect; but when it is, the bulb lights up and the whole environment
is completely transformed.

Puritanism offered women reasonable protection from arbitrary ill-treatment in traditional
patriarchy; but once feminism arose, gyneocratic misandry became the default
setting of the pan-Anglosphere institutional establishment. The extreme sexual scarcity associated with Puritanism artificially inflates female sexual market value to unnatural levels in a nominally 'equalist' society, instantly turning men into slaves and women into deities.

This is why Anglo
feminism is so reflexively sex-negative: residual Anglo-American Puritanism underwrites
all its primary positions.Conversely,
the Anglo-American state (abetted by its malleable Common Law) reflexively
supports feminism by its very nature. Relampago Furioso describes America's latest
assault on American sexual freedom, an underhand attempt to ban its few
legalised brothels in Nevada:

The new gynarcho-tyranny formerly
known as America continues to expand its utterly insane War on Sex. Two of its
“heroic” Police State USA units have hit three Nevada brothels (all owned by
charismatic pimp Dennis Hof) with what basically amounts to false charges.

Cockblocking cops from Lyon County
Sherriff’s Office and Immigration and Customs Enforcement claim immigration
violations are occurring at Hof’s brothels, even though they’re the very
agencies responsible for conducting background checks on the prostitutes who
work in the brothels when sex work cards are issued by government officials.

It’s truly one of the most
astonishing cases of the fox guarding the hen house ever heard of. Nonetheless,
a heterosexual hating press chimed with glee:

An investigation of three legal
Nevada brothels owned by a reality TV star and candidate for the state
legislature found immigration violations and indications of possible human
trafficking, the county sheriff said.

Thus said Reuters, member of the
propaganda wing of the Deep State establishment. (You know, the people who
constantly screw with your psychology through advertising, public relations,
and fake news operations.) Surely, this hit couldn’t have anything to do with
Hof running for office, and being the favored candidate to win a Nevada assembly
seat? To ask the question is to answer it.

Police State USA Hits its Nevada Brothels with False Charges, The New Modern Man, 09/10/2018

Of course, other factors are implicated in the rabid misandry engulfing the
Anglosphere: for example, the soulless post-industrial machine tendenciesRelampago
Furioso writes about; or the homocentric tendencies discussed by Richard
Scarecrow; or the feminist infiltration of Anglo-American legalism identified by many learned commentators on this site.

However, all these things are in themselves harmless; they become misandrist weapons
only in the presence of Anglo puritan-feminism.

Wednesday, 10 October 2018

A leading British newspaper recently carried some chilling scientific news:

Never has a major scientific breakthrough carried such sinister implications for mankind - specifically, for men.

“Sorry, chaps, you’re obsolete": that may as well have been the
headline of an announcement that gripped the research community on
Thursday, as the birth was revealed of the world’s first mammal born to
two mothers.

A team at the Chinese Academy of Sciences stunned geneticists
by revealing they had effectively rewritten the rules of reproduction,
and in the process discovered exactly why some animals, including
humans, need to have sex. The breakthrough came in the form of 29 mice successfully born to same-sex (female) parents.Not only were the animals born healthy, but they went on to have babies themselves.

A similar experiment using two male parents failed, however, the pups dying within days of being born.

In achieving the successful births, the researchers proved they had
identified and overcome the factor that makes joint male-female
involvement in reproduction essential for humans. Commentators said the study may pave the way for single-sex humans to reproduce in the future, although not any time soon. Mammals can produce offspring only through sexual reproduction using an female egg fertilised by male sperm.

Not all the natural world uses the same process.Some female birds, reptiles, fish and amphibians are able to reproduce alone, with hammerhead sharks and Komodo dragons some of the more colourful examples. The
Chinese team set out to identify the genetic process that takes place at
the point of mammalian conception that demands genes from both sexes.

They focused on a phenomenon known and “imprinting”, where for
roughly 100 genes, only the copy that comes from the mother or only the
copy that comes from the father ever becomes “switched on”. In human embryos, the male genes make up for the females ones that are not switched on and visa versa. It means an embryo made up of same-sex genes will effectively have some missing.

To overcome this barrier, the scientists obtained some embryonic stem
cells from a female mouse and used the gene-editing Crispr-Cas9, which
has been likened to a genetic pair of scissors, and were able to remove
maternal imprinting by “snipping” out a single letter of genetic code
from three crucial regions. The edited stem cells were then injected into the egg of a second female mouse, which successfully formed an embryo. Two-hundred-and-ten embryos were created to yield the 29 live mice.

Co-senior author Qi Zhou said: "This research shows us what's possible. We saw that the defects in bimaternal mice can be eliminated and
that bipaternal reproduction barriers in mammals can also be crossed
through imprinting modification."

Dr Teresa Holm, from the
University of Auckland, said there is a chance in the long run that the
technique could be developed to apply to humans. "[The research] may even lead to the development of ways for same-sex
couples to reproduce healthy children of their own,” she said, although
she pointed to “significant ethical and safety concerns that would need
to be overcome”.

The researchers also produced 12 full-term mice with two genetic fathers, using a similar but more complicated procedure. These were transferred, along with placental material, into surrogate mothers. The bipaternal mice pups only survived for 48 hours after birth.

A spokesman for the Progress Educational Trust, a charity concerned
with the ethics and law of genetic-assisted reproduction, said:
"Creating a genetic offspring from two mice of the same sex is an
exciting achievement. The scientific challenges and legal barriers that would need to be
to overcome to make this possible in humans are huge and so make this
unlikely to happen any time soon. That said, we should start discussing whether this is a noble endeavour."

SOURCE: UK Daily Telegraph - 11/10/2018

The legal and scientific 'barriers' this spokesman speaks of are so much moonmist and hot air. In the Anglosphere, the law is a feminist plaything. It has ensured that virtually all reproductive rights and decisions are now firmly in female hands, with fathers little more than disposable sperm-donors and ATM machines. As we also know, the whole essence of the Anglosphere is gyneocratic misandry, an inevitable expression of its residual puritanism and attendant anti-life agendas. This culture detests masculinity, originality, virility and other masculine virtues; it prefers men to be desexualized pseudo-women, hence the endless support for the 'trans' subculture emanating from every orifice of 'mainstream' Anglo-American society.

In sum, this scientific news must have sent the Anglo elites into paroxyms of joy: their dream of a man-free society bereft of dissent, honour, reason and progress is at last in sight.

Sunday, 7 October 2018

The Handmaid’s Tale
is all the rage among Anglo-American women. Everywhere I go they seem to be
babbling about it - as if, at literally any moment, they were going to be
stuffed into Victorian dresses and forced to bear rich men’s children. In
truth, The Handmaid’s Tale is failed science fiction: despite falling birth rates
around the industrialised world, no advanced democratic country has done anything
to limit female reproductive freedom. In fact, most countries have actually
extended it (Ireland being a notable recent example). Moreover, the West is becoming more secular on every measure, with the average Christian now an affluent white female (the same demographic who watch The Handmaid's Tale, oddly enough).

This image really reflects female life in 2018...

So why, then does
this lame 80s novel and its various spin-offs retain such a strong hold on the
female imagination? It bears no relation whatsoever to existing affairs and
social currents are moving ever further from the scenario it describes.

The following
article shows the terrifying reality – that the Anglosphere is now an open
matriarchy where women can get away with literally anything, including (in fact
especially) the grooming and sex abuse of minors:

Teacher who Groomed Student avoids Jail

A NSW teacher's aide who blamed a weight loss drug for dramatically increasing her sex drive before
she groomed a student for sex has received a suspended 12-month jail sentence.

Today, Newcastle Local Court magistrate Robert Stone said Jackie Hays was remorseful, unlikely
to re-offend and would continue psychiatric treatment in the community which
was notavailable in prison. The 51-year-old sobbed in court while being
sentenced.

She was placed on a 12-month good behaviour bond after the magistrate accepted she was "immensely
sorry" for the inappropriate behaviour which had been out of character.

The magistrate said Hays, who's been diagnosed with a borderline personality disorder, was
disappointed with herself and had learned from her mistakes.

Hays pleaded guilty to grooming the 15-year-old student for sex in 2015 after becoming infatuated
with him. She sent him numerous explicit text messages. The 51-year-old turned
to the boy's mother on Wednesday and said "sorry darling" before
leaving the courtroom.

Hays had blamed the weight loss drug Duromine for causing her sex drive to dramatically increase
and impair her judgement, but Mr Stone found the drug had no significant impact
on her predatory behaviour.

Legal Aid lawyer Gillian Jewison had argued Hays started taking Duromine four months before she
began targeting the teenager. While there was no medical evidence linking the
drug to Hays' offending, Ms Jewison said the mother of two's friends noticed
she seemed to be ''off the planet'' and acting bizarrely.

When Hays was interviewed by detectives she described the text messages sent back and forth
to the boy as "filth." Hays, who was 47 at the time, was willing to
have sex with the teenager who attended the same Hunter Valley school where she
and the boy's mother worked. But she claimed she wanted to wait until he turned
16.

Mr Stone said the mother of three had been in an unhappy marriage and her emotional needs were
not being met when she began sexting the boy. She would have faced
a maximum penalty of 10 years in jail if the case had been heard in the
District Court, but prosecutors agreed to have the matter dealt with in the
Local Court where the maximum penalty was two years.

Hays was initially charged in mid-2017 with five offences alleging she had been sending explicit
text messages and phoning two students, but four of the charges were dropped
after she agreed to plead guilty to one count of grooming a child for unlawful
sexual activity.

So there we have
it: women can now groom and abuse minors with complete impunity. What feminist still seriously dares to claim a man would have escaped a jail
sentence for the same offences? Given the well-attested privilege women are
shown in the education system, in job selection, in the media, in reproductive
matters, in healthcare and before the law, one is left completely baffled by
the popularity of The Handmaid’s Tale.In reality, female power and privilege expand with each passing year.
The Anglosphere is an openly misandrist, gynocentric matriarchy, yet Anglo
feminism still insists – or needs to insist – that women are somehow sexually
oppressed and downtrodden.

Is this how Anglo women seriously view themselves? Mad.

I have already
written about the Anglo-American fixation on meddling in the affairs of other
countries, a project designed to mask the various dysfunctions of the Anglo-American
bloc itself. This fixation allows Anglo feminists to claim female
oppression in Mozambique or Iran somehow applies to themselves (as 'women'), thereby
occluding the gynocentric misandry that prevails in countries like Australia
and the United States. The Handmaid’s Tale is merely the next step in this project
of obfuscation and self-delusion, with a hypothetical fantasy world replacing the 'global misandry' so beloved by Anglo feminists.

I have a theory. Women
are now so exalted across the Anglosphere, so obviously advantaged in every
sphere of life, they can only feed their need for victimhood by retreating to a
fictional world of imaginary persecution. The triumph of Anglo-American
feminism has been so total that its devotees can only maintain their cherished
victim status by confusing fantasy for reality.