Help

This subforum is for critical evaluation of Wikipedia articles. However, to reduce topic-bloat, please make note of exceptionally poor stubs, lists, and other less attention-worthy material in the Miscellaneous Grab Bag thread. Also, please be aware that agents of the Wikimedia Foundation might use your evaluations to improve the articles in question.

I posted the bounty because I believe that his criticisms of Wikipedia are intellectually dishonest. There are legitimate grounds for disagreement with WP. Mr. Brandt's website contains none.

That makes no sense, though. What does intellectual dishonesty have to do with anything? Are you saying he really does want a biographical article on WP about him that anyone can vandalize to their heart's content?

Or, rather, it simply reinforces my earlier, uh, implication, which is that you and various other WP'ers are doing this primarily, if not only, for revenge.

I posted the bounty because I believe that his criticisms of Wikipedia are intellectually dishonest. There are legitimate grounds for disagreement with WP. Mr. Brandt's website contains none.

That makes no sense, though. What does intellectual dishonesty have to do with anything? Are you saying he really does want a biographical article on WP about him that anyone can vandalize to their heart's content?

Or, rather, it simply reinforces my earlier, uh, implication, which is that you and various other WP'ers are doing this primarily, if not only, for revenge.

Oh well, it's just five bucks...

I voted keep for one reason and posted the bounty for another.

I voted keep because of the ungodly huge list of sources on the talk page of the AfD debate, which, in my opinion, established not only verifiability but notability, (which, by the way is not a policy).

I posted the bounty for an unrelated reason; I believe Brandt's arguments are dishonest. People post them for random/personal reasons; take a look at [[WP:BOUNTY]].