The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied a motion Tuesday by Dallas Cowboys running back Ezekiel Elliott and the NFL Players Association to "to recall a mandate that would have allowed Elliott to pursue a rehearing with the 5th Circuit," thus upholding his suspension for the time being, according to attorney Daniel Wallach and Ian Rapoport of NFL.com.

But according to NFL.com, "NFL Players Association lawyers representing Elliottfiled a motion for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction in U.S. district court in an effort to get theCowboysrunning back on the field as soon as possible" with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

In essence, that leaves Tuesday's hearing in New York as Elliott's last chance at having his suspension overturned:

Daniel Wallach @WALLACHLEGAL

Slim possibility that Judge Mazzant holds off on a dismissal order if rehearing EB is requested. But injunction is definitely toast for now.

The protracted legal battle between Elliott and the NFL stems from the league's decision to suspend Elliott for six games after he was accused of domestic violence. Elliott was never charged with a crime or arrested, but the NFL said itdiscovered enough evidencein its own investigation to warrant a suspension.

NFL Network legal analyst Gabe Feldman noted that Elliott and the NFLPA are "challenging the process the league undertook to suspend Elliott—not the factual conclusions from its investigation," however.

Feldman explained further:

"This is part of the ongoing fight between the players association and the league over the power of the commissioner. We have seen the NFL go to great lengths in court to affirm and strengthen and maintain they believe in what they collectively bargained for. And we've seen the players association fight and say that the commissioner [Roger Goodell] has overreached and they want to protect the rights of the players ... [The NFL] doesn't want precedent out there that says a court can interfere with the commissioner's decision or with an arbitrator's decision."

In other words, the legal battle has become about Goodell's power within the collective bargaining agreement, much as it did in the Tom Brady "Deflategate" saga.