On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:18 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 09:14 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Leif Arne Storset<lstorset@opera.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The 'object-fit' and 'object-position' properties ask:
>>>
>>> # Do we need to allow browsers to alias ‘image-position’
>>> # and ‘image-fit’ (the old names for these properties)
>>> # to these properties? Does any browser actually need
>>> # to do so?
>>>
>>> I believe only Opera has implemented these, and they were released with
>>> the
>>> 'object-' names from the beginning. Besides, they were prefixed, so I
>>> don't
>>> think it would matter anyway.
>>
>> Removed, thanks for the clarification!
>
> They weren't there for browser implementations, Tab, they
> were there for printer implementations. I don't think you
> should have removed that.
Were they unprefixed in printers?
~TJ