They have also demanded an FIR be filed against the owner of Reliance Defense Limited, Anil Ambani and Dassault Aviation and its CEO Eric Trappier also.

“We call upon you to register an FIR against Mr Anil Ambani for conspiring with the Prime Minister, Mr Modi, to receive an undue advantage/pecuniary gain against public interest and investigate and prosecute the matter,” reads the complaint registered by Bhushan, Sinha and Shourie to the CBI.

Citing the “abuse of authority” clause in the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988, to proceed against Modi and Parrikar, the complainants alleged, “Mr Anil Ambani’s companies have been verging at the point of insolvency. Creditors of his group companies have initiated proceedings against his companies to recover their dues… Reliance ADA has had to sell many of its precious assets to pay off its interest obligations and stave off insolvency proceedings. In these circumstances, a conspiracy was hatched by the two of them (Modi and Anil Ambani), by way of which, Mr Modi obtained an ‘undue advantage’ from Dassault Aviation, for awarding a contract for 36 Rafale aircrafts in ‘fly-away’ condition, by abusing the authority of his office and doing his public duty dishonestly and improperly.”

“The ‘undue advantage’ has been received by his close associate and friend Mr Ambani. As a consideration for abusing his official authority and doing his public duty dishonestly, Mr Modi compelled Dassault to choose Mr Ambani as an offset partner, by way of which Mr Ambani received, and is receiving, and will continue to receive, for the next 40 years, an ‘undue advantage’,” the complainants further alleged.

Accusing PM Modi of “influencing the decision of the Contract Negotiation Committee by agreeing to purchase a few additional weapons at highly inflated prices,” the complainants alleged that PM Modi ensured that the price per aircraft was increased by ₹1,000 crores of rupees more each so that the final offset obligation and the undue advantage to be taken by Ambani was as high as possible.

Referring to an amendment to the Section 17(A) of Prevention of Corruption Act, Bhushan, Sinha and Shourie said that they are aware of the peculiar situation in which CBI will have to seek permission from PM to investigate a case against him. However, prior sanction is not necessary for the registration of the FIR, said Bhushan.

“We are also aware that this will place you in the peculiar situation, of having to ask the accused himself, for permission to investigate a case against him. We realise that your hands are tied in this matter, but we request you to at least take the first step, of seeking permission of the government under Section 17(A) of Prevention of Corruption Act for investigating this offence and under which, “the concerned authority shall convey its decision under this section within a period of three months, which may, for reasons to be recorded in writing by such authority, be extended by a further period of one month”.

“Of course, the prior sanction is not necessary, for registration of F.I.R. and investigating the offences committed by Mr. Ambani and Mr. Trappier,”
Complaint says that though, in 2014, a Work Share Agreement was concluded between Dassault and H.A.L. (Hindustan Aeronautics Limited) under which H.A.L. and Dassault were to execute 70% and 30% of the work, respectively, for aircrafts that were to be made in India, on April 10, 2015, “the original deal was unilaterally discarded by Mr. Modi as under that deal H.A.L would have been the production agent for Dassault in India and there was no scope for Mr. Ambani to get an undue advantage” and added that “Mr Ambani incorporated a company called Reliance Defence Ltd. on 28th of March, 2015, just 12 days before 10th of April, 2015”.

“It was solely in order to secure an undue advantage for Mr. Ambani, that public servant Mr. Modi abused his office and performed his public duty improperly and dishonestly by discarding, without authority, the old deal for 126 aircraft with Make in India by H.A.L. under Transfer of Technology. Instead, to obtain an undue advantage, to be received by Mr. Ambani, Mr. Modi unilaterally and without authority, proposed a new deal for just 36 aircrafts, with no Make in India, with no transfer of technology, all in a ‘fly away’ condition to be manufactured in France, that would have allowed Mr. Ambani to gain an undue advantage by being Dassault’s key offset partner. Dassault was singularly induced by Mr. Modi to accept Mr. Ambani as an offset partner in exchange for giving Dassault the 36 aircraft deal,” said the complaint.

The complaint also alleged that the PM and Ambani abused their official position in light of the fact that Dassault’s production line would have shut down, had there been no contract from India.
Sinha, Shourie and Bhushan alleged that the PM kept IAF, HAL, the Foreign Ministry, and even the Defence Minister in the dark about his impending designs.

“The scam was however revealed when the actual price of 36 aircrafts was revealed in a Press Release by Dassault and Reliance (Annexure 33) and Financial Press Release statement of Dassault for 2016 (Annexure 45). Both the documents show the total price of the deal to be about Rs. 60,000 crores (about 8.139 Billion Euros) for 36 aircraft. This is the scam, for it works out to Rs. 1,660 crores per plane. This is more than double the price of the aircraft under the earlier 126 MMRCA deal. And almost Rs. One Thousand Crores more than the price that was furnished by Government itself to Parliament on 18th of November, 2016. This has resulted in a loss of over 36 thousand crores of Rupees to the public exchequer at the cost of national security, solely so that Mr. Ambani could receive undue advantages,” they said in the complaint.

As per the complaint -
A -We call upon you to register an F.I.R., for the offence under section 7(a) & 7(b) & 7(c) read with Explanation 2 of Section 7, of the amended Prevention of Corruption Act, and Section 7, Section 13(1)(d)(ii), & Section 13(1)(d)(iii) of unamended Prevention of Corruption Act, against the Prime Minister, Mr. Modi, and investigate and prosecute the matter.

B-We call upon you to register an F.I.R., for the offence under section 7(a) & 7(b) & 7(c) read with Explanation 2 of Section 7, of the amended Prevention of Corruption Act, and Section 7, Section 13(1)(d)(ii), & Section 13(1)d(iii) of unamended Prevention of Corruption Act, against the then Defence Minister, and investigate and prosecute the matter.

C-We call upon you to register an F.I.R. against Dassault Aviation and more particularly, its C.E.O., Mr. Eric Trappier, for abetment of the said offences, and investigate and prosecute the matter.

D-We call upon you to register an F.I.R. against Mr. Anil Ambani for conspiring with the Prime Minister, Mr. Modi, to receive an undue advantage/pecuniary gain against public interest, and investigate and prosecute the matter.

Reality views by sm -

Friday, October 5, 2018

Tags – Rafale Scam FIR Register CBI

Popular Post on Rafale Scam

3
comments:

Didn't read it fully, sm. If CBI gets adequate evidences, they can go ahead with charging the case.But where will the PM take the pecuniary gain to, as the members of is family live just an average life?

Yesterday in a Malayalam journal, some statement of the Air Chief Marshal appeared and it says Dessault had previous experiences(five instances were quoted) of not getting delivered the products in time or in a near future. And moreover as per the demand of IAF, so many advanced modifications have been made in the new sets of arms ordered for. Don't know if true or false. Anyhow what Rahul and his family are not pure of their parts in scams and corruption. All politicians are at personal gains.