“Richard Prasquier lost his honor” was just one of a dozen headlines attacking or quoting the CRIF leader after his piece appeared, explaining why he thinks Sarkozy is still the best candidate for the presidency. “He has a deep knowledge of Israel and a deep sympathy for this country,” wrote Prasquier.

Political analysts say Sarkozy is expected to lose, but Prasquier wrote he was worried by a possible victory by Francois Hollande. What would be the influence of “the leftist parties and the Greens which express a deep hostility towards Israel”? asked Prasquier, before answering: “I expect a surge in leftist and Communist manifestations of anti-Zionism.”

Prasquier appeared to express more concern about the far left and the “new anti-Semitism” than about far-right leader Marine Le Pen, and that’s why many journalists criticized him.

Le Pen is not expected “to exert any influence on policies toward Jews in France” wrote Prasquier, because “there is no possibility of political agreement between” Sarkozy and the far right. The head of CRIF added: “The Muslim community and immigration issues were at the forefront of their campaign. Indeed, Marine Le Pen even tried to attract Jewish voters as if the past of the National Front and/or the view of some of its still influential leaders had not been known.”

Several journalists, mainly from the weekly Marianne, which is vehemently hostile to Sarkozy, said the article shows that CRIF is no longer against the far right so long as it doesn’t openly criticize Jews.

“When the National Front aggresses immigrants and Muslims, the man who represents French Jews doesn’t see anything deeply wrong and writes this to the people of Israel,” wrote Claude Askolovitch in an article called “CRIF loses its morals outside the Ghetto”. The Huffington Post and website Rue 89 published similar articles.

Author

Your Comments

The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. All readers can browse the comments, and all Forward subscribers can add to the conversation. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not and will be deleted. Egregious commenters or repeat offenders will be banned from commenting. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.