>IMO, XML Namespaces "outranks" RDF and therefore RDF must
>toe-the-line insofar as what the XML Namespace defines; and
>if it doesn't, then the XML community at large is not going
>to like RDF too much.
Ah, thanks for putting the issue squarely where it belongs. It's
evidently a political matter, not a technical or philosophical one.
At this point I will bow out and let the staghorns clash in the
forest.
Pat Hayes
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(650)859 6569 w
(650)494 3973 h (until September)
phayes@ai.uwf.eduhttp://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes