Dating ring topology training

The Social Life of Routers Applying Knowledge of Human Networks to the Design of Computer Networks by Valdis Krebs We often forget that computer networks are put in place to support human networks--person-to-person exchanges of information, knowledge, ideas, opinions, insights, and advice.

This article looks at a technology that was developed to map and measure human networks--social network analysis--and applies some of its principles and algorithms to designing computer networks. And as we see more peer-to-peer P2P models of computer-based networks, the P2P metrics in human network analysis become even more applicable.

Social network analysts look at complex human systems as an interconnected system of nodes people and groups and ties relationships and flows --much like an internetwork of routers and links. Human networks are often unplanned, emergent systems.

Their growth is sporadic and self-organizing [1].

Online Networking Level 1 Training Videos, CBT Nuggets

Network ties end up being unevenly distributed, with some areas of the network having a high density of links and other areas of the network sparsely connected. These are called "small world networks" [2].

Computer networks often end up with similar patterns of connections--dense interconnectivity within subnetworks, and sparser connections uniting subnetworks into a larger internetwork. Social network researchers and consultants focus on geodesics --shortest paths in the network.

Many of today's social network algorithms are based on a branch of mathematics called graph theory.

Wanting meet someone else cool. Swindled in your odds of the most popular dating websites in address.

Social network scientists have concentrated their work, and therefore their algorithms, in the following areas: Individual node centrality within a larger network--network dependency and load upon individual routers Overall path distribution--good connectivity without excessive routing tables Improving communication flow within and between groups--designing better topologies Network patterns surrounding ego networks--strategies for analyzing and manipulating individual router connections Analyzing dating ring topology training flow behavior of client organization--how computer networks can support human networks One of the methods used to understand networks and their participants is to evaluate the location of actors in the network.

Measuring the network location is finding the centrality of a node [3].

All network measures discussed here are based on geodesics--the shortest path between any two datings ring topology training. We will look at a social network, called the kite networkthat effectively shows the distinction between the three most popular centrality measures--the ABCs--Activity, Betweenness, and Closeness.

This model [4] was first developed by David Krackhardt, a leading re-searcher in social networks.

Activity Figure 1 shows a simple social network. A link between a pair of nodes depicts a bidirectional information flow or knowledge exchange between two individuals.

Dating ring topology training: overview of network topologies

Social network researchers measure network activity for a node by using the concept of degrees --the dating ring topology training of direct connections a node has. In this human network, Diane has the most direct connections in the network, making hers the most active node in the network with the highest degree count.

Common wisdom in personal networks is "the more connections, the better. What really matters is where those connections lead to--and how they connect the otherwise unconnected! She connects only those who are already connected to each other--does she have too many redundant links?

3. The Social Life Of Routers

Click above for larger view Betweenness While Diane has many direct ties, Heather has few direct connections-- fewer than the average in the network. Yet, in may ways, she has one of the best locations in the network--she is a boundary spanner and plays the role of broker. She is between two important constituencies, in a role similar to that of a border router.