Please share far and wide!

Saturday, August 13, 2016

Advanced Discussion on Why Radiation Is far Worse Than Vested Interest Models Show It to Be

I have submitted my work on radiation damage to Chitin, and
radiation magnification within Chitin to about 15 real scientists that
are working on things related to mass die offs, sea life health.
Not a single freaking response. Over say 3 months.
I submitted it to Berkley today.

chitin…not that it matters very much and certainly not to detract
from stocks good work on the subject, but it was Code who first worked
on the biopolymer as ion exchange resin concept last year nov 2015

I think a big piece of the puzzle was not picked up; disturbance of
point sources of radiation to the bioelectric field which is important
for morphogenesis. Radioactivity from potassium does not disturb the
ionic and voltage gradients which are key biological signaling factors.
Man made radiation is not only concentrated to begin with, on the atom
level, but also is distributed unevenly. This acts as an antenna or
amplification effect which actually turns intrinsic radiation into a
poison. We have two confirmations of this antenna effect. One is from
Busby but a recent experiment also mentioned something similar. I lost
track of the paper
So its not just that radiation destroys chitin, rather its that
chitin is one biopolymer that absorbs radiation into point sources.

stock. Heavy metal radionuclides "weaponize" background radiation
via the photelectron effect. Also, a specific protein has been
identified that transports radionuclides and also has an antenna effect
Busby antenna type effect;
the absorption of gamma radiation is proportional to the 4th power of
the atomic number Z. paragraph 4.5. SECONDARY PHOTOELECTRON EFFECTS; A
problem in radiation protection arises when high Z elements are
incorporated into living tissue, since the enormously greater absorption
of photon radiation by such material will result in enhanced doses to
tissues adjacent to the high Z material.This causes enhanced
photoelectron ionization at the DNA due to enhanced absorption of
natural background radiation . A similar process occurs with the
Platinum chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin which binds to the DNA and
acts as an antenna for background radiation and radiotherapy beams.

Recently, scientists have reported that an iron-binding protein
called siderocalin can also bind and transport actinides into cells, a
major advance in understanding the biological chemistry of radioactive
metals. the biological chemistry of actinide metal ions is largely
unknown, and new approaches to the understanding of pathways underlying
contamination are needed. , a basic understanding of how actinides act
in the body is still needed. Although…

scientists; sorry you cant have it both ways. When you protect the
industry, even three meltdowns equivalent to about 10,000 Hiroshima
bombs is absolutely safe. You know all about the science thus our only
fear is fear itself. But when you want to patent an anti fallout drug,
this is what you say;

'Actinides and lanthanide fission products, as well as other
radionuclides from the nuclear fuel process, are a severe health risk as
contaminants due to both radiological and chemical toxicity. The
toxicity of these ions is governed by uptake mechanisms, oxidation state
and speciation, intracellular distribution, and interactions with
various macromolecules, and depends on their physiochemical properties
and ligand preferences. Little is known about the toxicity mechanisms of
actinides and lanthanides at the molecular level, the impact of
radiation induced damage versus chemically induced damage, and how metal
sensing translates into appropriate cellular responses.
We are exploring the lanthanide and actinide sensitization efficiency
of selective ligands through the antenna effect in order to develop
thermodynamically stable complex systems that display characteristic
optical features. These features will be essential to the development of
new therapeutic strategies, environmental decontamination platforms,
and diagnostic probes in nuclear medicinehttp://actinide.lbl.gov/gtsc/BioAn/research.html

I maybe get it.
The biological normalcy that has evolved, over eons, in a radioactive
world and beyond, is being attenuated, detrimentally, by the extra
photoelectron ionization, that is occuring with obviously internal
exposure?

fukushima shoeshttp://www.post-gazette.com/image/2016/03/07/ca88,168,2527,1890/thomas0309-shoes-1.jpg
Soluble cesium quickly dilutes to safe levels well below background.
Wrong again Kenny. Other auto-radiophotographs show this point source
effect occurring from uptake in biological tissues. If the points of
radiation consist of high atomic weight particles even the ever-present
background radiation gets drawn into it like a black hole. absorption of
gamma radiation is proportional to the 4th power of the atomic number.
Meanwhile a normal protein, siderocalin, is fixing the toxic ionization
metal in place and ALSO acting as a sensitizing antenna. The effect is
powerful enough to use as a visual diagnostic tool. Normal background
radiation, evenly distributed such that the chance of a cell getting hit
is only once a year is now your enemy, as is your iron transporting
protein siderocalin. Chitin is another normally good and indispensable
life element that has been rendered deadly. Meanwhile scientists are
stuck in a conceptual roadblock; all radiation is the same and can be
assessed on a linear dose model. How wrong they are. How disappointing
that our best and brightest arent so bright after all

I think back on how much resistance I got for talking about
background radiation, pointing out the differences, highlighting the
failings of the linear no threshold model. It was a bummer man. It made
me switch to simple one liners….never simple enough! Never forget the
known unknowns and the unknown unknowns I said. But to what effect? In
the latest research, we can get a feel for how much our brightest
scientists know about the fallout they call safe or deadly well known or
not, depending on their whimsy.
"Little is known about the toxicity mechanisms of actinides and
lanthanides at the molecular level, the impact of radiation induced
damage versus chemically induced damage, and how metal sensing
translates into appropriate cellular responses"
Little is known, little is known, little is known, little is known.
Thus you cant compare fallout to background, or rely on your safety
guidelines as gospel truth, or argue hormesis because little is known,
little is known, little is known

3 comments:

Recognition: Don't wait, choose your team and move forward. A prime example of this is Suspicious0bservers with the theory the sun triggers earthquakes, who is getting back lash on the findings. A reminder from a great engineer;

“I don't care that they stole my idea . . I care that they don't have any of their own” ― Nikola Tesla

Aye, that is a challenge. To bad we don't have carbon based units at home, from petri dish to full function in 6 weeks to share the load. But maybe there is something like that, I remember one of my first reads out here 'Multiple Meteor "Attacks" are More Common Than You Think'. After reading that I thought the fellow who does some research on the 1871 fires and with findings that could clear charges on Mrs. O'Leary's cow? I'm in, along with thousands of others on many articles here.

In other words, carbon based units out of the dish sharing your views. That's an impressive stream.