서울
:
과학기술정책연구원

Date

2013-12

Series Title; No

정책연구 / 13-04

Pages

242

Subject Country

South Korea(Asia and Pacific)

Language

Korean

File Type

Link

Subject

Industry and Technology < Science/Technology

Holding

과학기술정책연구원

License

Abstract

Since the enactment of the Framework Act on Science and Technology in early 2000s, the scope of South Korea’s science and technology innovation policies has expanded under the frame named “creative conversion” and has amassed expected policy achievements. However, evaluation and diagnosis of what contribution South Korea’s science and technology innovation policies have made to the nation’s creative conversion for the last ten years aren’t made clearly. First of all, reasonable evaluation and diagnosis of South Korea’s science and technology innovation policies should be done first to seek for the direction of the policies and to improve the efficiency of creative conversion. Therefore, this study will analyze the overall trend of South Korea’s science and technology innovation policies for the last ten years, come up with the problems which the policies are facing, and make policy proposals to deal with such problems.This study consists of three parts. First, the researchers of this study contemplate the development and spread of the theories about innovation systems and innovation policies in terms of theoretical views and then grasp theory trends. The researchers diagnose the failure of innovation systems and track the development of system tools to address the failure. And the researchers also diagnose the context under which the theories about innovation systems are accepted and the changes in the theories in South Korea in order to investigate the reason why the theories of innovation systems from South Korea’s science and technology innovation policies have shrunk. Such contemplation and diagnosis of South Korea’s science and technology innovation policies in terms of theoretical views are to understand the issues and frames which get attention from today’s theorists of innovation policies and to apply the issues and frames to analysis of the trends of South Korea’s science and technology innovation policies. (The rest is omitted)