Purpose-presents FDA's policy on its planned
enforcement approach for foods containing methyl parathion residues
in accordance with the "channels of trade" provision of the
FQPA.

Slide 3

Under Channels of Trade (COT) provision:
If use of pesticide under FIFRA has been canceled, and the tolerance
under FFDCA has been revoked, and FDA finds a residue in a food.

The food is not "adulterated"
because of the residue if the residue complies with former tolerance,
and.

The responsible party can demonstrate
to FDA that application was made at a time/manner that was legal under
FIFRA.

Slide 4

Food that meets these two tests will not
be subject to regulatory action because of the MP residue, and may remain
in the channels of trade and be sold in the normal fashion.

Some frozen foods may not be sold to consumers
for up to 4 years after harvest of the crop, thus "channels of
trade" status for a given pesticide/crop could extend to 4 years
post harvest.

Slide 5

Residues of MP on foods from 1999 crop:

Last permitted date of application, 12/31/99.

MP dissipated from ambient and refrigerated
stored foods by 9/00 and 12/00, based upon EPA estimates.

MP residue remains in frozen food indefinitely;
food may be in COT 4 years post harvest.

Slide 6

FDA's planned enforcement approach for
2000:

Tolerance revocation finalized, ??/00.

Till end of 2000, only foods necessarily
from 2000 crop with MP residues subject to enforcement action, e.g.
fresh lettuce

For foods not necessarily from 2000 crop,
e.g. apples, if MP residue is found (within former tolerance) FDA will
not require a showing by responsible party, but will take enforcement
action if it has information that MP was applied to crop in 2000.

Slide 7

FDA's planned enforcement approach for
beyond 2000:

MP residues only expected to be present
in frozen foods.

If MP residues are found (within former
tolerance) responsible party will have to show compliance with COT requirements
to avoid enforcement action.

Slide 8

Examples of types of documentation for
showing:

Packing codes, batch records, inventory
records showing that.

The frozen product was packed, formulated,
or processed in 2000, or ingredients were purchased in 2000.

Frozen carrots, packing code indicates
packed in 6/00; OK

Slide 9

Types of documentation for showing:

Blended juices with MP residue; if tolerance
remains for one commodity (cranberries) but is revoked for other (apples)
processor will have to document that it took steps, e.g. testing, to
ensure that incoming apples or apple concentrate, were MP free.

Slide 10

Imported foods to be handled essentially
the same as domestic.

After tolerance revocation, imported items
from 2000 crop year, e.g. lettuce, with MP residue would not be allowed
to enter U.S.

Starting in 2001, for frozen foods with
an MP residue, entry will be detained pending showing of COT compliance.

Slide 11

Attempt to minimize burden:

Where parties will need to make a showing,
to minimize burden, we cited examples of documentation that we believe
most processors already maintain, e.g. packing code records, batch records,
inventory records.

Slide 12

Future FQPA revocations:

FDA will consider issuing a generic guidance
document incorporating the principles in the MP guidance if it believes
that these principles can be applied in a broad manner for other pesticides.