The mother of a 3-month old girl presented her daughter for chiropractic care with a medical diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Her complaints included frequently interrupted sleep, excessive intestinal gas, frequent vomiting, excessive crying, difficulty breastfeeding, plagiocephaly and torticollis. Previous medical care consisted of Prilosec prescription medication. Notable improvement in the patient’s symptoms was observed within four visits and total resolution of symptoms within three months of care. This case study suggests that patients with complaints associated with both musculoskeletal and nonmusculoskeletal origin may benefit from chiropractic care.

From the Full-Text Article:

Introduction

For the chiropractor attending to the care of the pediatric patient, a number of clinical challenges arise from the simple and realistic reassurance for the parents that chiropractic
care “can help” to making the proper referral to a specialist for co-management and ultimately providing an effective and safe intervention. As demonstrated by surveillance studies on the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by children, [1–5] the patient may present with multiple symptom complex associated with both musculoskeletal and non-musculosketal origin. In the interest of evidence-based practice on the chiropractic care of children, we describe the successful care of a pediatric patient with multiple symptoms consisting of frequently interrupted sleep, excessive intestinal gas, frequent vomiting, excessive crying, difficulty breastfeeding, plagiocephaly and torticollis.

Case Report

The mother of a three-month-old female presented her daughter for chiropractic consultation and possible care with a chief complaint of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). At 2 months of age, the patient was diagnosed by her family physician with GERD and prescribed 2 mg/
ml of Prilosec™ (Omeprazole). Instructions were to take 2 cc p.o.q. days at two a day for about six weeks with a follow up visit in eight weeks. Prior to her medical diagnosis and concurrent with medical care, the patient was attended to by another chiropractor to address complaints
of intestinal gas and vomiting. The patient attended a total of 5 visits with the first chiropractor but the infant’s subjective complaints “somewhat improved” without total resolution. According to her mother, the patient suffered from frequently interrupted sleep, excessive intestinal gas, frequent vomiting, and excessive crying and difficulty breastfeeding. The patient was described as “very fussy” at feeding time and had difficulty making a
complete seal so that she had no desire to breastfeed, refused a pacifier or suck on her mother’s fingers or her own. Crying described as a high-pitched sound and vomiting were noticed as worst after her feedings. When she was picked up or held, the patient would cry excessively
and go into full body rigidity and throw herself into an upper body extension (i.e., an arching motion). According to the patient’s mother, walking and “bouncing” her baby was the only way her daughter would breastfeed. The patient’s frequent interrupted sleep was associated with an almost constant “wiggling” of the body throughout the night. The patient would sleep continuously for only 2 hours during the night with even shorter “naptime” during the day.

Physical examination of the patient revealed the following. The infant was very agitated and displayed the high-pitched painful cries throughout her evaluation. While being held and crying, the patient would go into upper body extension (i.e., arch her back) as described by her mother. Notable examination findings included a positive suckling reflex with no response to stimulus. The patient’s head was observed to be approximately 45º in right rotation with slight left lateral flexion of the cervical spine. A flattening of the patient’s right occiput (i.e., plagiocephaly) was noticeable. Further inspection revealed her mandible was “seated” to the right and could explain her inability to make a proper seal for breastfeeding. Moderate blistering on the right lower lip was also noticed. The patient’s abdomen was extremely taut with discomfort on digital palpation as noticed by the patient’s withdrawal response. Based on a chiropractic examination procedure incorporating postural examination and static and dynamic palpation of the spine, [6] it was determined that the patient had spinal segmental dysfunctions at the atlas and the 4th thoracic vertebrae. [7] The atlas was determined to have a right posterior rotation and right laterality malposition with respect to the C2 vertebral body (VB). The 4th thoracic VB had a posterior malposition with respect to C3VB. Following craniosacral technique procedures, [8] cranial distortions of the right parietal and temporal bones were determined as well as aberrant motion of the mandible at the right temporomandibular joint (TMJ).

With the parent’s consent, the patient was cared for with high velocity low amplitude (HVLA) thrust type spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) characterized as Diversified Technique [9] with technique modification appropriate for the patient’s age and size. Chiropractic SMT was applied to the atlas in the following manner. With the patient in the seated position, the clinician’s index finger contacted the right transverse process of the patient’s atlas. An HVLA thrust with a lateral to medial vector and a slight posterior to anterior component was applied (see Figure 1). The patient also received pediatric SMT to correct the posterior malposition of the T4 VB using an index finger contact over the spinous process of the patient’s T4 VB. A posterior to anterior HVLA vector was applied (See Figure 2).

With respect to the patient’s cranial distortions; the patient’s parietal, temporal bones and mandible were corrected using Craniosacral Therapy8 (see Figure 3 and 4). Following the patient’s initial visit, the patient’s mother stated that her child was able to feed from both breasts, that she was able to make a complete seal with her mouth and not “pull off “ from her mother’s breast. The patient’s mother was able to sit to feed her infant rather than walk and “bounce” her child as previously described. The infant also slept for 3½ hours the night after her initial treatment without the uncomfortable “wiggling” that would awaken her. Given the positive response to care, the patient was scheduled with a treatment frequency of 3 visits per week for 3 weeks followed by 2 visits per week for 3 weeks and 1 visit per week thereafter. The patient was cared for similarly as described for the first visit. With continued chiropractic care came continued improvement in the patient’s symptoms.

Following her 4th chiropractic visit, the mother intimated to the attending clinician that she made an independent decision to take her daughter “off” Prilosec™ due to the noticeable improvement in her daughter’s symptoms. By the 7th visit, the patient was vomiting only once per day as compared to vomiting following after every feeding. The patient was now able to latch on to her mother’s breast more efficiently without pulling off before finishing her feeding. According to the patient’s mother, her daughter began to increase her sleeping time during the night to 4–5 hours at a time as well as increasing the length of her “nap-time” in the day to approximately 2 hours. The infant’s parents also noticed that their daughter was not crying as often or for extended lengths of time as before chiropractic care. The patient’s high-pitched, “painful cry” began to subside and replaced by quieter, “whimpering-like” cry. The infant’s whole body began to relax without the body rigidity that was noticed when she was held. The patient’s mother attributed her daughter’s improvement to the chiropractic care received. Long term follow up revealed full resolution
of symptoms.

Discussion

Several topics are salient for discussion in the case reported;
particularly for the patient that presents with multiple
symptoms concomitant with several diagnoses.

The principal reason for attending chiropractic were
symptoms initially attributed to GERD. GERD is a pathologic
process in infants associated with poor weight gain,
signs of esophagitis, occult blood loss, anemia, recurrent
and persistent respiratory problems, dysphagia and a complex
of changes in neurodevelopmental patterns. An infant
with GERD may likely have more than 5 episodes of reflux
per day, regurgitate approximately 28g per episode,
refuse and have problems with feeding, have problems
gaining weight and demonstrate increasing irritability. [10]
GERD may also have otolaryngologic manifestations
such as chronic sinusitis and recurrent otitis media. [11]
Complications include such serious conditions as esophageal
ulcerations, strictures, and Barrett’s esophagus. [12]

The
differential diagnosis of GERD involves a variety of disorders
and is provided in Table 1.13 The definitive diagnosis
of GERD in the pediatric population is determined by
several means although no exact diagnostic protocols exist
to accurately diagnose GERD in infants. [13] Three tests frequently
used to diagnose GERD include 1) intra-esophageal
pH monitoring, scintography, and intraluminal
esophageal impedance; 2) inflammation testing; and 3)
the use of symptom-assessment questionnaires. The least
invasive of these diagnostic methods of course is the
symptom-assessment questionnaire. The attending clinician
in this case report was well aware of the medical diagnosis
of GERD and concurred. The diagnosis of GERD
was confirmed by the chiropractor based on the patient’s
presenting complaints of excessive crying and irritability,
which often occurred following feeding. The patient also
demonstrated the arching back characteristic of babies
with acid reflux as well as vomiting, regurgitation and intestinal
gas. Blistering of the right lower lip may be associated
with the patient’s suckling dysfunction but more
than likely may be attributed to acid burns as a result of
gastric acid regurgitation.

Lastly, the patient did not respond
to medication, which is characteristic for patients
with GERD that are less than 2 years of age. Upon further
retrospection, we would also include the diagnosis of irritable
infant syndrome of musculoskeletal origin (IISMO)
and infant-cry-irritability with sleep disorder syndrome
(IFCIDS). [14,15] The diagnostic criteria for IISMO/GERDS
and IFCIDS are provided in Tables 2 and 3. The patient
satisfies the diagnostic criteria provided for both IISMO
and IFCIDS. The patient’s musculoskeletal complaints of
right plagiocephaly and torticollis concomitant with cranial
distortions and malposition of the mandible may likely
be more associated with intra-uterine constraint since a
right occiput plagiocephaly is not consistent with a torticollis
posture of right rotation and left lateral flexion of the
head and neck. [16,17] Intra-uterine positional plagiocephaly
occurs more often on the right occiput. The right-sided
preference is based on the finding that 85% of vertex presentations
lie in the left occipital anterior position. As the
infant’s head descends into the pelvis, growth of the right
occiput and left frontal areas may be limited, leading to
potential development of plagiocephaly. [18] The malposition
of the mandible is more than likely associated with the
plagiocephaly and its concomitant cranial distortions
causing an anterior displacement of the ipsilateral TMJ. [19]

Implications for Chiropractic Care

The chiropractic care of the pediatric patient with complaints
associated with non-musculoskeletal and musculoskeletal
problems are fraught with anecdotes and
testimonials in the chiropractic profession. To provide a
context for discussion on the implications of the case presented,
we performed a selective review of the literature
involving the chiropractic care of pediatric patients with
GERD, in addition to IFCIDS and IISMO. Unfortunately,
IFCIDS and IISMO are descriptive terms only and thus too general to perform a review of the literature in the
context of chiropractic care. We encourage the reader to
access the papers by Miller and colleagues14,15 on these
topics as well as the article by Alcantara and colleagues
on their review of the sleep disorders in pediatric patients
under chiropractic care. [20] A literature search of Pubmed
[1966–2007] using the subject heading “gastroesophageal
reflux disease AND chiropractic” or “GERD AND
chiropractic or “acid reflux disease AND chiropractic”
with search limits: English, Complementary Medicine,
and All Child: 0–18 years, Similarly, MANTIS [1965–2007] was consulted using similar search terms as above
specified to the Chiropractic Discipline, the English language
in Refereed Journals and High Clinical Relevancy.

Two articles were found. Jackson [21] addressed the clinical
assessment strategies (and augmented by clinical experience)
regarding the condition of GERD but provided no
chiropractic treatment strategies or approaches to this
condition. Recently, Jonasson and Knapp [22] presented the
care of an 8-yr-old boy with gastroesophageal reflux disease.
The patient initially presented with complaints of
headache and neck pain. Treatment to the patient was described
as chiropractic SMT to the upper cervical spine in
combination with cranial therapy and dietary advice (i.e.,
remove all wheat and dietary products from diet). This
approach to care was unsuccessful with the patient referred
to a colleague where an eventual diagnosis of
GERD was made and referred for medical care.

With respect to the chiropractic technique described in
this case report, the use of HVLA-type thrusts are well
documented in several clinical trials. [23–27] Furthermore,
pediatric chiropractic SMT has recently been found to be
safe with only a handful of reported adverse events (i.e.,
10 cases) in 104 years of scientific publications based on a systematic review of the literature. [28] However, the same
cannot be said of cranial technique and remains to be
fully investigated. [29] The craniosacral interventions and
health outcomes, the validity of craniosacral assessment,
and the pathophysiology of the craniosacral system have
been found to have insufficient evidence. Research methods
to conclusively evaluate its effectiveness have not
been applied to date.

With respect to generalizations and making cause and
effect inferences from the case presented, we caution the reader for the following reasons. As with all case reports,
improvement in a patient’s symptoms may be attributed
to (a) the natural history, (b) regression to the mean and
(c) the result of placebo. Furthermore, both the clinician
and the patient (or in this case the patient’s mother) may
make incorrect inferences from treatment due to (d) the
demand characteristics of the therapeutic encounter and
(e) subjective validation. Consider for example the “dogma”
that the majority of children outgrow their GER or
GERD symptoms is challenged. [30] Studies now indicate
that childhood GERD may be a risk factor for long-term
severe disease sequalae in adulthood. [31] There are findings
that in infants with acid reflux, after 1 year, despite
resolution of symptoms, the histology remained abnormal.
32 Based on 22 studies, Pace et.al. [33] concluded that
placebo is a relatively inactive drug in the short-term
treatment of erosive ulcerative reflux and does not appear
to change the natural history of the disease.