medicis's blog

Here is the question. All of us are dedicated to promoting the truth about 911. That means combating disinfo wherever it occurs ... but most especially in venues where it can have a more negative effect. OpEdnews is read by many many people. Care to defend the cause?

Anybody up to it? Defending what we believe. Fighting the 'Employees'......?

This is related to 9/11 truth, I believe, inasmuch as all who promote 9/11 truth are likely to fall under the provisions of the bill.

This is a 'must read'...... The latest assault on the freedoms of Americans (beginning with such pieces of trash as the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, Warner's bill, Directive 51..... and now this. And it should be pretty clear from the fact of such support (404 vs 6) in the House, that both parties are complicit in this and both are working at the behest of the actual power structure in this country to suppress any dissent, any efforts to actually confront the power structure (peacefully or otherwise).

This needs to go viral... indeed it has begun to be on the web and internet radio within the last day.....

So Please spread this out to others you may know....... Although it is probably pointless to 'call your elected representative' , the fact that is has yet to go to the Senate means that there is at least some chance to fight it.

The USS Liberty incident is just one of a myriad of "operations" throughout U.S. history perpetrated by our government.

They were designed to instill fear in the citizenry in order to more easily justify going to war.

This incident lined the pockets of the oil and military industrial complexes.

It is the same reason we are in Iraq today and equally so when Iran, eventually, will be attacked prompted by yet another false flag incident which, undoubtedly, is currently in the making, evidenced by what we are reading, hearing and seeing in the news.

Going back further in history, one can cite the Gulf of Tonkin incident. This incident took us to Vietnam, cost 60,000 American lives and never happened.

I thought I would post this well-written article on 911 and EI not only because M. Green ties some pieces together but because this is one of the first articles I've come across written by someone who shares my profession. I was not aware, further, that he also wrote 'How They Get Away With It' which is available on Jim Hoffman's site at this url:

This is very interesting. I was not aware of this. If you are not aware of this read it.

...."Zarrillo heads out to the fire command post, situated in front of 3 World Financial, the American Express Building, where he relays this message to several senior firefighters. He says, “OEM says the buildings are going to collapse; we need to get out.” (OEM is the Mayor’s Office of Emergency Management, which has its headquarters in WTC 7.) Fire Chief Pete Ganci’s response is, “who the f___ told you that?” Seconds later, they hear the noise of the South Tower as it collapses."

I have copied: this significant find by 'vw' on RI. He wrote: I don't know the exact ettequette for posting like this but thought this was worth knowing by all (I hadn't seen anything like this earlier on 911blogger so if it is a duplicate of this information, I'm sorry).

---------- his entry:

Who would have guessed there were two George Monbiots writing for the Guardian?

Did Bush orchestrate 911? If he did, what are the reasons for it? I think 911 could have been much worse!

::::::::

The Secret Government Reasons For 911

It could have been worse!

WTC Fell To Strengthen America

The WTC was brought down by the imminient threat of Terrorists organizing in foreign countries to stop and destroy the United States. The problem is that Americans refuse to take it seriously. My analysis is that in Order for the United States to stop these killers, America had to committ some acts of terror upon itself in order to get the attention of

"What no one seemed to notice," said a colleague of mine, a philologist, "was the ever widening gap, after1933,between the government and the people. Just think how very wide this gap was to begin with, here in Germany. And it became always wider. You know it doesn't make people close to their government to be told that this is a people's government, a true democracy, or to be enrolled in civilian defense, or even to vote. All this has little, really nothing to do with knowing one is governing.

What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if he people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security. And their sense of identification with Hitler, their trust in him, made it easier to widen this gap and reassured those who would otherwise have worried about it.

"This separation of government from people, this widening of the gap, took place so gradually and so insensibly, each step disguised (perhaps not even intentionally) as a temporary emergency measure or associated with true patriotic allegiance or with real social purposes. And all the crises and reforms (real reforms, too) so occupied the people that they did not see the slow motion underneath, of the whole process of government growing remoter and remoter.

With US mid-term elections one month away, it is not surprising to find Washington’s elite criminal factions (neocon and neoliberal) engaged in a new game of political chicken over 9/11 red herrings. The appearance of bickering hides the fact that operatives of both factions are lying. Both sides are cynically continuing the massive bipartisan cover-up of 9/11 and the “war on terrorism."

Undeniable fact: all of Washington “knew” about 9/11

It is an amply documented fact -- no news whatsoever -- that the Bush administration had absolute foreknowledge of 9/11, and deliberately ignored warnings received within the US and from officials and intelligence agencies outside the US.

As written by Michel Chossudovsky, “the foreknowledge issue itself is a red herring, a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue . . . Of course the Bush administration knew." Of course Washington “knew” about its own false flag operation. Of course Washington “knew” about using its own covert intelligence network. Of course Washington “knows” that 9/11 was an intelligence “success," not an intelligence “failure."

This article puts the importance of context and the surround of events transpiring now that underscore the importance of 9/11 truth. The article implies that there is no issue available that can lead to a sea change in attitude about the neocon wars for global energy control except the issue of the fraud of 9/11. Very good read.

"Cold War Shivers": War Preparations in the Middle East and Central Asia

by Michel Chossudovsky

"Without 911, the war criminals in high office do not have a leg to stand on. The entire national security construct collapses like a deck of cards."

----------
The article begins (excerpt):

It is essential that people across America and around the World take cognizance of the dangers of a Middle East war directed at Iran and act decisively to challenge the US military agenda and reverse the tide of war.
The World is at the crossroads of the most serious crisis in modern history. The US has embarked on a military adventure, "a long war", which threatens the future of humanity.
This article documents recent developments, focusing on military deployment and preparations in the event of a US led war on Iran. This text follows a number of earlier reports published by Global Research pertaining to the War on Iran (See Iran dossier, Nuclear War dossier, Lebanon dossier )