“U.S. government already requires international passengers to participate in the Advanced Passenger Information System, providing their full name, gender, date of birth, nationality, country of residence, and travel document type and number to the TSA before boarding. Under the proposed Secure Flight Program, this procedure would also be required on domestic flights.”

Should there be a case of mistaken identity, there is no way for you to correct that since there is no clear appeals process if you’re denied boarding or have to go through extra screening constantly.

Share this:

Like this:

The U. S. Government has admitted that autism in one child was caused by vaccines she received. I will quote from the bottom of the document:

“In sum, DVIC has concluded that the facts of this case meet the
statutory criteria for demonstrating that the vaccinations CHILD
received on July 19, 2000, significantly aggravated an underlying
mitochondrial disorder, which predisposed her to deficits in cellular
energy metabolism, and manifested as a regressive encephalopathy with features of autism spectrum disorder.”

The child also suffered from seizures which they originally denied were from the vaccine. Later they changed their mind:

“PS: On Friday, February 22, HHS conceded that this child’s complex partial seizure disorder was also caused by her vaccines.
…

This is exactly what communist countries do to political dissidents. I hope these people are only making their stay in the UK brief, because the EU will come after them. I do not know when this will happen, but it will happen

The UK is part of the EU and in the EU, individual nations are not allowed to have laws differing from the EU. Poland and the Baltic states are already learning this lesson:

“I’ve been covering … U.N. stories, three to four a day, for two years, and for the last two years there’s been no problem at all,” Lee said. “Then that Friday, I received the e-mail. There’s something a little skeezy here. I think that Google got involved with the U.N. on these Millennium goals and thought, this is the United Nations, if they tell you some small Web site is a thorn in their side and there’s a credible reason you could remove them from your news service, you do it.”

I have to say, it does seem odd that Lee got de-listed after he challenged Google about their non-signing of the human-rights and anti-censorship compacts.

Google has said that Lee’s site will be re-instated, but it will take a couple of weeks. It doesn’t matter whether you agree with Lee or not. It is disturbing that here in Amerika, America, that a journalist would be censored because a company or organization does not like what the journalist writes.

Share this:

Like this:

There has been talk of detention camps in alternative media for a few years now. Mainstream media and a lot of people dismissed this notion. This news has now hit the mainstream, courtesy of the San Francisco Chronicle:

“Beginning in 1999, the government has entered into a series of single-bid contracts withHalliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR) to build detention camps at undisclosed locations within the United States. The government has also contracted with several companies to build thousands of railcars, some reportedly equipped with shackles, ostensibly to transport detainees.”

This contract has been in effect for close to nine years now. What other contracts have been done secretly?

“What could the government be contemplating that leads it to make contingency plans to detain without recourse millions of its own citizens?”

That is a very good and very chilling question. The government is already removing children from families if they disagree with the medical treatment given to the child. See the post below this one for that story.

Do we still think detention camps are a myth? Do we still think we live in a free society?

The teacher did not like the scratches, nor did she like the doctor approved restraints. It appears that these parents could not have pleased this teacher no matter what they did.

Adding more insult to injury:

“…even though the court determined “the evidence is clear that the parents have always stood by and tried to help their son,” the court sided with the government.”

The court did not say the Tseglins were abusive. The court did not say the Tseglins were neglecting their son, but that didn’t matter. They still took Nate from his parents, and do not allow them to be involved in decisions regarding his care.

Nate first went to a group home but after he ran away, the state decided to punish him even more by putting him in a mental facility with the criminally insane. His parents are concerned that he will suffer all sorts of abuse there.

CPS also told the Tseglins that they have “…”wrong set of beliefs” and even threatened to force them to undergo court-ordered psychological evaluation.”

Of course, even if the Tseglins were to change their beliefs, who’s to say that their new beliefs would be acceptable to the State? And therein lies the problem-that the State gets to decide which beliefs are acceptable.

Sounds more like China than the U.S. to me. And they’re coming after the poor and immigrants today-who will it be tomorrow?