Wednesday, February 26, 2014

I mentioned British writer, journalist, blogger James Delingpole
(photo) in my last posting on the flooding in England and citing it was neglect, not global warming, that allowed those English fields and towns to flood. Well, I mislaid this report from James that was posted at the end of January I think you should know about. It concerns Dr Richard Lindzen, professor of atmospheric physics at MIT and his visit to Westminster, where the House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee met to ''grill'' him and Canadian feminist, journalist and photographer, Donna Laframboise (below) on the pros and cons of the IPCC's 5th Assessment Review.

Three things stood out for Mr Delingpole; the bullying, bluster and arrogance of the committee's chairman Tim Yeo; the unnecessary rudeness of John Robertson MP (''I guess you've had your chance to sell your book while here," he told Laframboise); and all the while the wearied patience teetering on the brink of Olympian contempt radiated from the seated Dr Lindzen.

Lindzen, I'm sure, has really had quite enough of trying to explain to idiots why it's perfectly possible to ''believe'' in the existence of anthropogenic global warming without feeling the urge to bomb the global economy back to the dark ages in order to mitigate it. This is -- and always has been -- the position of all the climate sceptics I've ever met. We take the cue from Lindzen because no scientist with expertise in the relevant field makes this point quite so eloquently or persuasively. But a decade or more spent repeating the obvious has begun to tax Lindzen's patience, as became clear after a testy interrogation from Tim Yeo.

Tim ''the Troughter'' was trying to bludgeon Lindzen into proving the point that climate change IS a problem because the decade from 2000 to 2010 was the hottest in history. Lindzen maintained that this proves NOTHING other than that temperatures at the end of a warming period are almost inevitably going to be higher than those in the beginning or the middle. But the Trougher looked well pleased with what he clearly considered a ''gotcha'' exchange.

Then Lindzen was asked what he thought of the ''consensus'' -- at which point he got his manicured claws out: ''I think the majority of people working in climate science will go with the view that climate science is serious. I don't think that would be surprising to anyone. There are very few people in any scientific field who say 'May field is not serious'. Other than that there is so much penalty for saying that this is not an important problem that I don't think people would go out on that limb either.'' (ouch!)

He went on: I've been asked very frequently at universities, 'Of the brightest people you know, how many people were studying climate [....or meteorology or oceanography...]? And the answer is usually 'No One.''' And warming to his theme: ''You look at the credentials of some of these people on the IPCC and you realise that the world doesn't have that many experts, that many 'leading climate scientists.'''

Tim Yeo, at this point asked, ''Dr Lindzen, are you suggesting that scientists in the field of climate were academically inferior? ''Oh yeah,'' said Lindzen. ''I don't think there's any question that the brightest minds went into physics, math, chemistry....'' (double ouch!)

The Way I See It.....even climate scientist, author and former NASA advisor Dr Roy Spencer has had enough. He says, ''When politicians and scientists started calling people like me ''deniers'', they crossed the line. They indirectly equate (1) the skeptics' view that global warming is not necessarily all man-made nor a serious problem, with (2) the denial that the Nazi's extermination of millions of Jews ever happened.'' He went on to say that many skeptics have, for too long, ignored the repulsive, extremist nature of the comparison and it was time to push back. ''I'm now going to start calling these people ''global warming Nazis.''

My readers have read over the years the pseudo-scientific ramblings by warmist leaders that have falsely warned of mass starvation, ecological collapse, agricultural collapse, overpopulation, killer storms and droughts....all so that the masses would support their radical policies. Policies that would keep the government grants rolling in but would not voluntarily be supported by a majority of freedom-loving people. Like the Nazis, they advocate the supreme authority of the state (fascism). Like the Nazis, they are anti-capitalist. They are willing to sacrifice millions of lives of poor people at the altar of radical environmentalism, advocating expensive energy policies that increase poverty.

Dr Spencer (photo left) sums up by saying, ''So, as long as they continue to call people like me ''deniers'', I will call these warmists what they have become, global warming Nazis!''

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

It has taken years, but finally, I say ''Finally'', some warmist scientists are publicly contradicting their more alarmist colleagues. One of the Met Office's most senior experts yesterday made a dramatic intervention in the climate change debate by insisting there is no link between the storms that have battered Britain and global warming.

Matt Collins, (photo) a professor in climate systems at Exeter University, said the storms have been driven by the jet stream -- the high-speed current of air that girdles the globe -- which has been ''stuck'' further south than usual. Professor Collins told The Mail on Sunday: ''There is no evidence that global warming can cause the jet stream to get stuck in the way it has this winter.'' It's interesting to note that Prof Collins is also a senior advisor -- a co-ordinating lead author -- for the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). His statement appear to contradict Met Office chief scientist Dame Julia Slingo. Last weekend, she said pompously announced ''all the evidence suggests that climate change has a role to play'' in the storms. Failing to mention that same thing happened in 1948 and where also Holland was ravaged by its dikes failing and also flooding the countryside.

Actually, Big Government seems more to blame. Christopher Booker explains in The Spectator that it's not global warming that caused such ghastly floods in the UK, but incompetence and a Green EU wetland plan. He lives near Somerset (SW England) so he started investigating the rising water six weeks ago -- which has now become widespread inundation there, with damages estimated at over 100 million Pounds. In The Spectator he writes that before 1996, local groups of farmers and engineers managed the drains, but in 1996 the EA (Environmental Agency) took over. Regular dredging stopped happening, the pumping stations were neglected (or stopped...), and the local drainage boards found it hard to get anything done with the EA RED tape.

Then things got worse, Booker explains: ''In 2002, the Baroness Young of Old Scone, a Labour peeress, became the agency's new chief executive.'' As Booker goes on to note, this twit used to run the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and Natural England but never bothered to use her influence to stop the building of windmills that were killing birds by the thousands and polluted the Natural English countryside. But she also had different aims to the people who lived there. The locals saw what was coming, they feared that the river had become choked and silted, they wanted control back. Instead, what they got was some parts of Somerset suddenly ''returned to wetland'' - but that, it seems, was kinda the goal of the old biddy.

James Delingpole, (photo below) British writer, journalist, blogger and broadcaster exposes the lies about the floods. 1)This is the wettest winter since records began. No it's not! It was considerably wetter between November 1929 and January 1930. This January was wet but still only ranks as the sixteenth wettest month since records began in 1766.

2) Dredging the rivers wouldn't have made much difference anyway.Yes, of course, that's what environment apologists would like you to believe. But of course they're talking rubbish. The only way floodwater can escape is out to sea: hence the need for keeping our rivers as free-flowing as possible i.e. with regular dredging. For clear evidence of what has gone wrong over the years, have a look at the before and after pictures of the River Parrett taken by Richard North. The black and white one shows the river to be and free-flowing, this is not seen in the coloured picture.

3) Environment Secretary, Owen Paterson should resign.No, he shouldn't. Paterson is on of the few politicians to have shown any integrity in this crisis. Unlike his Conservative colleagues David Cameron and Philip Hammond he has not ass-kissed and sought to curry easy favour with the green lobby by blaming the floods on ''climate change''. He was the first senior politician to visit Somerset Levels and grasp the truth about the problem; that the floods were a direct consequence of Environmental Agency and European Union policy.

Dredging above and No dredging below

The Way I See It.....I am sick to the back teeth and so should you dear readers of hearing every unrepentant warmist, low-life Greenie, the Marxists of the Environmental Defence Fund, every scientist sucking up to get climate grants and cynically brainwashed politician blaming every storm, drought, wildfire, flood, hot spell, cold spell and disappearing Arctic ice on GLOBAL WARMING. Enough already, just admit there hasn't been any appreciable warming in 17 YEARS and suck it up.

Lessons should be learnt, but they won't. All those listed above are going to try their damnedist to make the English folk forget as quickly as possible that these floods are a man-made disaster. Nothing whatsoever to do with anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Rather it is a result of a deliberate policy, initiated by the UN (Agenda 21), the idiot European Union and its bastard child, the Environment Agency, designed to create wildlife habitats at the expense of humans. A full inquiry should get to the bottom of this and weed the perpetrators out.

Monday, February 17, 2014

Let's face it....Marxists murdered millions and wrecked every country they've led. Yet 25 years after the Berlin Wall's fall, they still cling to power in Australia's universities. I posted two articles on this site in March last year about this subject. The first one was a warning of the coming of a Commie Conference in Melbourne; Commies Come to Challenge the System ! ( March 27, 2013) where I listed the Commie-filth intending to be speakers and the other article laid out the reality of Karl Marx's policies of Communism; ''A Manifesting of Karl Marx's ''Manifesto'' ! (also March 27th), something every university student should read at least 10 times.. Well, these vermin of the Socialist Alliance have persuaded Melbourne University to host this conference on its grounds....again! It's called MARXISM: Ideas to Challenge the System.Yes, it's amazing that universities are the last refuge of the Marxist -- of people such as VictoriaUniversity politics lecture Max Lane, recently on the executive council of the Revolutionary Socialist Party. This ratbag is now with the Socialist Alternative, which urges ''the smashing of the capitalist state apparatus'', including the ''dismantling of parliaments, courts, the armed forces and police.''
It's followers ''reject Australian patriotism'' and ''oppose all immigration controls'', and Lane last week dutifully sent a letter to the Jakarta Post to warn its Indonesian readers our immigration minister is actually a pirate who kills innocent people. (Conveniently failing to mention that 1000+ boat people perished under the Labour Party's slack border restrictions.) ''The forcible seizure of these people's boats and towing them back to a destination of their choice would seem to amount to piracy,'' Lane thundered. ''I would like to see Immigration and Border Protection Minister, Scott Morrison, charged with piracy and criminal negligence causing death.'' (Also failing to mention not one boat person has died under the Coalition's border policy).

It's odd that we pay a man with such extreme, anti-Australia views--and so ready to trash our reputation abroad--to teach students his filth at a university....and the university board allows it. Of course, most of them are Commies too! Sure, I agree that universities should teach all perspectives, so an odd Lane here and there is to be expected. But scores of them? In fact Lane is one of 12 academics listed to speak at MARXISM 2014, a four-day conference over Easter. Of course these atheists chose the highest Christian holy days to emphasise Lenin's favourite saying, ''Where Communism begins, atheism begins!''

Twelve academics is an astonishing turnout of speakers for a conference to promote a totalitarian ideology which has caused such misery and devastation. The Marxism 2014 speakers include, for example, Professor Jane Kenway, of Monash University's education faculty....who teaches tomorrow's teachers. Just lovely!

Rick Kuhn-- another politics reader at the Australian National University.Tom Bramble -- ''socialist activist'' and senior lecturer in industrial relations, University of Queensland,Diane Fieldes -- a teacher in industrial relations at the University of NSW.Lisa Miner -- a filmmaker teaching media students at Southern Cross University.Gary Foley -- an Aboriginal radical of Victoria University.Sarah Gregson -- an industrial relations academic at the University of NSW, and also president of her National Tertiary Education Union branch. (Her topic ''The RSL; foot soldiers of capitalism'')Ali Alizadeh -- who teaches literature and creative writing at Monash, also writes for Overland,a far left magazine generously funded by the Australian Council with more of our money.Patricia Cornelius --a former academic now on Australia Council Assessment Panel, which helps to decide how much in grants to give magazines like -- hey! -- Overland.''Boots'' Riley (USA) -- Negro Hip-Hop artist and socialist activist.Gilbert Achcar (UK) -- committed socialist and antiwar activist professor of Oriental and African studies at London University.Michael Karadjis -- member of Socialist Alliance and writes for the Green Left Weekly and teaches political Science on a part-time basis at various Sydney universities.And a half dozen more of the flotsam and jetsam of the Marxist underbelly.

How well have has the far left captured our institutions -- and public funding? And why are they so dependent on it? And why do they get so much of it? It's time Aussie citizens use Stalin's method by PURGING these bastards out of our universities and to protect Australia's future generations.

The Way I See It.....there is a lesson for this miscreants. A lesson when even these Marxist's children have shown their parents their politics is unworkable. You see, Marxism 2014 will once again hold a ''School of Rebellion'' to teach children as young as five ''constructive, collective and organized rebellion' with lessons on ''why unions matter'' and ''organising a student strike'', plus a little fun with ''smashing capitalism'' : a piñata party. But even the Green Left Weekly had to admit last year's School of Rebellion ended with its 30 students rebelling against the school itself.

It reported the children were given a ''graffiti workshop'' which involved the kids making their demands and ideas known with spray paint. They sure did! Their demands included, ''Free Internet, Free Food, Free everything!'' And then the older kids rebelled during a poetry session and demanding to go outside and play soccer. Which they did. Marxism in a nutshell: Here are mini-Marxists demanding everything be given to them free, and then refusing to work themselves.

And how often have we seen what inevitably follows: the state using force to make some work to provide what the others take and to crack down on those who protest? There will be no graffiti workshop at the School of Rebellon this year. That's Marxism, kids. It's amazing that after so many disastrous failures, your parents still believe this stuff. But far worse is that so many of your parents teach in our universities, trying to ture them into Schools of Rebellion, too. And we pay these Bastards !!!

Sunday, February 16, 2014

In an effort to combat perceived discrimination, one Portland, Oregon school seems to have gone off the deep end by suggesting peanut butter and jelly sandwiches carry racist connotations. According to the Portland Tribune, Verenice Gutierrez, (photo) principal of the Harvey Scott School, with 500 impressionable students, ''picks up on the subtle language of racism'' on a daily basis. She tried to add meaning to her stance by saying, ''What about our Somali or Hispanic students, who might not eat sandwiches? Another way would be to say, Americans eat peanut butter and jelly, do you have anything like that?' Maybe they eat torta or pita and find sandwiches intimidating.''
With the suggestion that a sandwich is racist, the Tribune journalist said the discussion on race ''has moved beyond slack-jawed incredulity into total self-parody territory.'' He added, ''I can see the local racists having fun with this and ramping it up to even use black current jelly on white bread!!!'' The Tribune noted that the school started the year with ''intensive staff trainings, meetings, classroom observations and other initiatives,'' to help teachers understand their own ''white privilege, in order to change their teaching practices to boost minority students' performance.''Principal Gutierrez completed a week-long seminar late last year called ''Coaching for Educational Equity,'' a program the Tribune says focuses ''on race and how it affects life.'' She also serves on an administrative committee that focuses on systemic racism. ''Our school focus and our Superintendent's mandate that we improve education for students of colour, particularly Black and Brown boys, and will provide us with many opportunities to use protocols in data teams, staff meetings, and conversations amongst one another,'' she said in a letter to the staff.

The Way I See It....Verenice Gutierrez is a racist and an embarrassment for Portland, Oregon. This idiot is worthy of mockery and ridicule. That Ms Gutierrez is controlling the teaching of children is a prime example of why home schooling and private schools are so popular nowadays. This woman is the 21st century version of a witch hunter, searching high and low for RACISM. She's trying to dowse evidence of it from the dust from the air. Guess what? When everything is racist, then nothing actually is!

Her excuse? An artfully made point that a student from some other immigrant culture may have cultural challenges to learning when coming to the United States - but I also reject it. That is not Racism. That is called assimilation. Culture after culture (including millions of Hispanics and I dare say even those Somalis, Sudanese, whatever) have navigated and benefited from the challenge. It is important for their own economic wellbeing that immigrants Suck-it-Up and assimilate.

But cultural assimilation can go both ways. Many born in Portland and the rest of the U.S. readily adopt the culture and culinary traditions of immigrants. I would suggest that interplay of immigrant cultural assimilation as it has been practiced in the United States is generally a positive thing. Ms Gutierrez should look up E. pluribus unium and leave the peanut butter sandwich alone. George WashingtonCarver would be turning in his grave with this nonsense.

Peanuts are native to the Americas. Carver was born into slavery in Missouri, but (despite real racism and personal health issues as a child) managed, without embodying victimhood, through hard work and self education to become a famed botanist and scientist. Carver, as a professor at Tuskegee University, promoted crop rotation. Soils in the south had become depleted from years of mono-culture cotton growing. Legumes, such as peanuts, fix nitrogen through their roots and help restore the fertility of depleted soils. Farmers and share croppers, black and white, were resistant to growing pecans and peanuts because of lack of markets for those crops. So craver worked on finding economic uses for these crops to promote their growing. Carver did not invent peanut butter, but he promote it along with many other products.

Sunday, February 9, 2014

Egyptian army chief, Abdel Fatah al-Sisi, has finally confirmed his intention to run for Egypt's presidency. A Kuwaiti newspaper 2 days ago, quotes him as saying, ''Yes, it has been decided, I have no choice but to meet demands of the Egyptian people. I will not refuse this request.'' He was also quoted appealing to all Egyptians for patience amid worsening economic an social conditions.Since al-Sisi overthrew the elected president, Mohamed Morsi, last July, there have been several campaigns calling on him to run for office, culminating in hundreds of thousands rallying in his name on the third anniversary of Egypt's 2011 uprising. His colleagues in the armed forces' governing council mandated him to run last Monday - and his popularity is so high among certain sections of the population that he is expected to win by a landslide.

So at week's end a confident interim President, al-Sisi sent out shock waves by declaring that it time for Islam to join the 21st century. A significant shift in public attitudes in the Arab world, among scholars and the media but also at the highest reaches of political power, suggests a potential for a refreshing fundamental change to come. While the media are fixated on the doomed ''triple negotiations'' in the Middle East, al-Sisi's public statement on Islam may represent nothing less than a paradigm shift in the Arab Muslim world. If fully realized, such a change could offer the Middle East an escape from its current violence and chaos.

﻿

Al-Sisi's comment was prompted by a recently issued statement overlooked by the Western press from twenty-five Egyptian Islamic scholars - some from Al-Azhar University, the closest thing Sunni Islam ha to an authoritative theological think tank. They stated that Islam needed to restore ijtihad, the investigation of Islamic dogma, in the light of ''changes in the objective situation within it functions.'' Subsequently, an Al Jazeera news anchor asked on camera why Arab armies couldn't be as humanitarian as the Israeli army in terms of trying to prevent civilian casualties. He was not fired. Then a famous and influential Egyptian scholar of Islamic history declared publicly that Muslim anti-Semitism was due to indoctrination and allied with ''stupidity.''
All this could be downplayed as unrepresentative and unlikely to have any substantial effect on Muslim thought or practice. But public pronouncements by al-Sisi, one of the two most powerful current Sunni Arab figures (the other being King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia), cannot be ignored. His statement that Islam must exit its 800-year STAGNATION and join the modern world is nothing short of revolutionary. His reference was to the year 1258, when the ruling mullahs of the day declared that the period of discussion of Islamic theology had come to an end and nothing more could be questioned. Since then, any attempt to change or even examine Sunni dogma was deemed heretical and thus subject to the death penalty.

King Abdullah

It remains to be seen if these events, including al-Sisi's strong declaration, have resonance in the region as a whole. Nevertheless, he is by far the most powerful figure in the Sunni Arab world as ruler of Egypt, the most populous Arab country and traditionally a major player in the region. In terms of power and influence, al-Sisi can only be compared to King Abdullah who is Guardian of the Holy Places (Mecca and Medina) and protector of the oppressive Wahhabi ultra-orthodox sect of Sunni Islam. The potential effect of such a development is hard to exaggerate. Until now, Sunni Arabs have been divided into secularists, routine followers of traditional Islam, mystics (known as Sufis) and followers of various idiotic extremist sects and movements, such as the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda, among others.

The Way I See It.....Islam never had a Reformation and Arab civilization never had a Renaissance, and missed the reasoning in The Age of Reason, a powerful book written by Thomas Paine in the late-1700s, which challenged institutionalized religious dogma of any stripe. By missing out on these THREE Rs over the past centuries, it doesn't take a blind man to see why both the religion and the culture have been stuck in the High Middle Ages seemingly forever!.

Any movement which accepts the need for modernization of the faith would be revolutionary in its impact on Sunni Islam, which comprises the great majority of Muslims from Morocco to the Philippines. A new element would be added to the ideological mix, namely a modern Islam, which would re-examine, as al Sisi remarked, such areas as separation of religion and state (which allowed the West to advance), women's rights, jihad, and relations with non-Muslims (that is, Christians and Jews). Most significantly, after these remarks, there was no condemnation from figures at Al-Azhar University, traditionally quick to denounce heresy.

The implications for Israel and for the West are obvious and potentially profound. Whether the field marshal's words will proven to have wings remains to be seen, but for the moment, at least, they have the potential to be more significant than al the ''negotiations'' going on in Switzerland and the Middle East put together. Now we have to hope Obama, Kerry and company don't screw up this inspirational moment with their usual heavy-handed diplomacy.

Monday, February 3, 2014

The media has ignored a disturbing trend plaguing America last year and only recently is mentioning it. Just before Thanksgiving on three prime-time Fox News shows ( Hannity, The O'Reilly Factor and On The Record) there was reporting on a violent spree of so-called ''Knockout Game'' assaults. It is disturbing that this story of black-on-white mob violence has been under every news organization's radar for most of 2013 and all 2012! Virtually the sole exception was WND, which since early 2012 has published frequent news stories by journalist-author Colin Flaherty documenting, in word and video, the stunning epidemic of black-mob violence on innocent whites sweeping America.

﻿
﻿
﻿﻿﻿﻿WND features these reports to counterbalance the virtual blackout by the rest of the media due to their concerns that reporting such incidents would be inflammatory or even racist. WND considers it racist NOT to report racial abuse solely because of the skin colour of the perpetrators or victims. Despite the documented violence caused by the Knockout Game, including six deaths nationwide since 2009, some on the left are downplaying the violence. Numerous liberal commentators and news outlets have disparaged those who report factually on the Knockout game. A Los Angeles Times leftist idiot joins other politically correct assholes calling the game a ''faux trend''.

Thomas Sowell, well known Negro economist, social theorist and political commentator, took the time to lay to rest the absurd media's denial of the Knockout Game. ''New York City police authorities are investigating a series of unprovoked physical attacks in public places on people who are Jewish. He describes the actions of the attacks. ''The way the game is starts when one of a number of young blacks decides to show that he can knock down some stranger on the streets, preferably with one punch, as they pass by. Often some other member of the group records the event so that video of that ''achievement'' in put on Facebook to be celebrated.'' Because Jews have been singled out in these attacks, police are considering prosecuting these assaults as ''hate crimes.'' In other cities the victims have been either whites in general or people of Asian ancestry. In Illinois, the game is often called ''Polar Bear Hunting'' by the young thugs, presumably because the targets are exclusively white.

The main reason for many people's shock and surprise is that the mainstream media have usually suppressed news about the knockout game or about other and larger forms of similar orchestrated racial violence in dozens of cities. If an attack is reported it's only as an isolated incident by unspecified ''teens'' or ''young people'' against unspecified victims, without any reference to the racial makeup of the attackers or the victims. Despite such pious phrases as ''troubled youths,'' the attackers are often in a merry, festive mood. In a sustained mass attack in Milwaukee on a white teenage couple, going far beyond the dimensions of a passing ''knockout game,'' the attackers were laughing and eating chips. One of the black thugs observed casually, ''white girl bleed a lot.''

That phrase - ''White Girl Bleed a Lot'' - is also the title of a book by Colin Flahery, which documents both the racial attacks across the nation and the media attempts to cover them up, as well as the local political and police officials who try to say that race had nothing to do with these attacks. Thanks to the media's political correctness this game is not just a passing prank anymore. People have been beaten unconscious, both in this game and in the wider coordinated racial attacks. Some of these victims have been permanently disabled and some have died from their injuries.

The Way I See It.....some of the media, as well as in politics, may think that they are trying to avoid provoking a race war by ignoring or playing down these attacks. But the to prevent a race war is by stopping these attacks, not trying to sanitize them. If these attacks continue, and continue to grow, more and more people are going to know about them, regardless of the media or the politicians. Responsible people of all races need to support a crackdown on these attacks, which can provoke a white backlash that can escalate into a race war. But political expediency leads in the opposite direction.

What is political expedient is to do what Obama's repugnant Attorney General, Eric Holder, is doing. He's launching campaigns against schools that discipline a ''disproportionate'' number of black male students. Now, New York City's newly elected liberal (socialist ass-wipe) is going to put a stop to police ''stop-and-frisk'' policies that have reduced the murder rate to one-forth of what it was under liberal mayors of the past. Apparently political correctness trumps human lives.

I really worry for America, aside from the Muslim Brotherhood infiltrating Obama's government agencies, FEMA setting up detention camps and buying millions of rounds of hollow-nosed bullets and now this stupidity of providing cover for black hoodlums. This is a massive disservice to everybody, including members of every race, and eve the hoodlums themselves. Better that they should be suppressed and punished now, rather than continue on a path that is likely to lead to prison, being converted to Islamic jihad, and even on to the execution chamber.

About Me

I live up to my name and speak frankly and for the silent majority so as to counter-balance the leftist, political correctness that pervades my country. I do not hold any legitimate racist feeling against anyone but I will always try to put crossed-referenced information on current events in a proper perspective that will allow for better understanding and discussions among people. My use of colourful language only adds to getting my point across. It's still a free country as far as I can see.
To put more it directly:
Freedom of speech is the paramount freedom. Without it, we struggle to exercise our other freedoms. With it, we can fight for those freedoms. It may be offensive, insulting and make some governments uncomfortable, but if this is the price to be paid for living in a society where all claims are open to question, then it is a price worth paying.
Feel free to join the I.P.A., the Institute of Public Affairs to help preserve the ideal of freedoms we are now enjoying.
Please note: Feel free to make a comment if you find it interesting and/or entertaining.