The Last Laugh

The Last Laugh (1924)

The old man is proud beyond all reason of his position as a
hotel doorman, and even prouder of his uniform, with its gold braids and brass
buttons, its wide shoulders, military lapels and comic opera cuffs. Positioned
in front of the busy revolving door, he greets the rich and famous and is the
embodiment of the great hotel's traditions--until, in old age, he is crushed by
being demoted to the humiliating position of washroom attendant.

Advertisement

F.W.
Murnau's "The Last Laugh" (1924) tells this story in one of the most
famous of silent films, and one of the most truly silent, because it does not
even use printed intertitles. Silent directors were proud of their ability to
tell a story through pantomime and the language of the camera, but no one
before Murnau had ever entirely done away with all written words on the screen
(except for one sardonic comment we'll get to later). He tells his story
through shots, angles, moves, facial expressions and easily read visual cues.

The
film would be famous just for its lack of titles, and for its lead performance
by Emil Jannings, which is so effective that both Jannings and Murnau were
offered Hollywood contracts and moved to America at the dawn of sound. But
"The Last Laugh" is remarkable also for its moving camera. It is
often described as the first film to make great use of a moving point of view.
It isn't, really; the silent historian Kevin Brownlow cites "The
Second-in-Command," made 10 years earlier. But it is certainly the film
that made the most spectacular early use of movement, with shots that track
down an elevator and out through a hotel lobby, or seemingly move through the
plate-glass window of a hotel manager's office (influencing the famous shot in
"Citizen Kane" that swoops down through the skylight of a nightclub).

Murnau's
technical mastery makes all of his films exciting to see. In the vampire movie
"Nosferatu," in the fiendish visions of "Faust," in the
imaginary city of "Sunrise," he created phantasmagoric visions that
seemed to define his characters: They were who they were because of what
surrounded them. This is a key to German Expressionism, the influential silent
style that told stories through bold and exaggerated visual elements--reality
slipping over into nightmare and back again.

In
the case of "The Last Laugh," however, Murnau's story is more of a
traditional narrative than usual. He follows the old doorman in almost every
shot, cutting away only to show what the doorman sees. And he exaggerates the
scale of the hotel and the city to emphasize how important it seems to the
doorman; the opening shot, coming down in the elevator and tracking across the
lobby (the camera was in a wheelchair), peers out through revolving doors into
the rain, showing elegant people and glittering surroundings; the doorman is
full of himself as he whistles for cabs and salutes arriving customers.

In
those early scenes Murnau shoots the doorman from a low angle, so that he seems
to tower over other characters. He is tall and wide, his face surrounded by a
beard and whiskers that frame its cherubic pomp. But beneath the grand display
his body is failing him, and we see him struggle with an enormous steamer trunk
and then take a moment's rest in the lobby--just long enough for the prissy
assistant manager to see him and write up a note. And the next day when he
arrives for work, his world shakes and the camera swirls as he sees another man
in uniform, doing his job.

Much
of the doorman's happiness in life depends on the respect paid to his uniform by
his neighbors around the courtyard of his apartment building. Murnau built this
enormous set (most of the film, including rainy exteriors, was shot on sound
stages) and peopled it with nosy busybodies who don't miss a thing. Ashamed to
be seen without his uniform, the doorman actually steals it from a locker to
wear it home. Later, when his deception is revealed, there is a nightmarish
montage of laughing and derisive faces.

His
tragedy "could only be a German story," wrote the critic Lotte
Eisner, whose 1964 book on Murnau reawakened interest in his work. "It
could only happen in a country where the uniform (as it was at the time the
film was made) was more than God." Perhaps the doorman's total
identification with his job, his position, his uniform and his image helps
foreshadow the rise of the Nazi Party; once he puts on his uniform, the doorman
is no longer an individual but a slavishly loyal instrument of a larger
organization. And when he takes the uniform off, he ceases to exist, even in
his own eyes.

Murnau
was bold in his use of the camera, and lucky to work with Karl Freund, a great
cinematographer who also immigrated to Hollywood. Freund filmed many other
German silent films, notably Fritz Lang's futurist parable
"Metropolis" (1926), and his first notable American film was
"All Quiet on the Western Front" (1930). He was one of the links
between German expression and its American cousin, film noir (see his work with
John Huston and Humphrey Bogart in "Key Largo").

Here
he liberated the camera from gravity. There is a shot where the camera seems to
float through the air, and it literally does; Freund had himself and the camera
mounted on a swing, and Abel Gance borrowed the technique a few years later for
his "Napoleon." There are shots where superimposed images swim
through the air, the famous shot that seems to move through the glass window,
and a moment when the towering Hotel Atlantic seems to lean over to crush the
staggering doorman.

I
mentioned the one place in the film where a title card is used. It is not
necessary, and the film would make perfect sense without it. But Murnau seemed
compelled to use it, almost as an apology for what follows. We see the pathetic
old man wrapped in the cloak of the night watchman who was his friend, and the
movie seems over. Then comes the title card, which says, "Here the story
should really end, for, in real life, the forlorn old man would have little to
look forward to but death. The author took pity on him and has provided a quite
improbable epilogue."

Improbable,
and unsatisfying, because a happy ending is conjured out of thin air. The
doorman accidentally inherits a fortune, returns to the hotel in glory and
treats all his friends to champagne and caviar, while his old enemies glower
and gnash their teeth. It is this ending that inspires the English language
title. The original German is "Die Letzte Mann," or "the last
man," which in addition to its obvious meaning may also evoke "the
previous man"--the doorman who was replaced. The dimwitted practice of
tacking a contrived happy ending onto a sad story was not unique with Murnau
(who had the grace to apologize in advance for it), and has only grown more
popular over the decades.

As
for Emil Jannings (1884-1950), he made "The Last Laugh" at the top of
his form; considered one of the world's greatest stars, he specialized in
towering figures such as Peter the Great, Henry VIII, Louis XVI, Danton and
Othello. The doorman's fall from grace was all the greater because the audience
remembered the glory of his earlier roles. Jannings came to America at the same
time as Murnau, won the Academy Award for "The Last Command" (1928),
was rendered unemployable by the rise of the talkies, returned to Germany and
found one of his most famous roles, as Marlene Dietrich's erotically mesmerized
admirer in "The Blue Angel" (1930). Jannings embraced the rise of the
Nazis, made films that supported them, was appointed head of a major German
production company, and fell into disgrace after the war. The coat no longer
fit.

Popular Reviews

Subscribe to our mailing list

Enter Your Email Address

Advertisement

The Ebert Club is our hand-picked selection of content for Ebert fans. You will receive a weekly newsletter full of movie-related tidbits, articles, trailers, even the occasional streamable movie. Club members also get access to our members-only section on RogerEbert.com