On 3/20/2013 11:18 AM, YBM wrote:> Proof, in the Mückenheim way, that an dog with no legs has two legs.>> Prop 1. No leg is necessary in order for a dog to have more than two> legs.>> Proof :> the right front leg is not necessary as you can remove it and the dog> still has more than two legs> the left front leg is not necessary as you can remove it and the dog> still has more than two legs> the right back leg is not necessary as you can remove it and the dog> still has more than two legs> the left back leg is not necessary as you can remove it and the dog> still has more than two legs>> Corrolary 1:> Even if you remove all legs to a dog, the dog still have more than> two legs.>> Corrolary 2:> The concept of quadrupede is absurd.>>