Remember the Uranium solution leak in Électricité de France’s atomic plant Tricastin – July 8th 2008 – HERE. The decision of the French prefectur of the Deptartment Vaucluse – web- took hours, so the warning not to take a bath in the now Uranium contaminated also came too late. Here is their official paper: .pdf file

This article contains the following: IPPNW (http://www.ippnw.org) believes, that the leaked Uranium now is easy biological available. The decay products of the leaked Uraniumnow enters fishing, irrigation of farming and the food chain – so they reach the people. Uranium is an alpha emitter – this means that at the same energy dose there is a much more higher cytotoxic and cancer carcinogenic potential than a gamma ray emitter. A thing the IAEA denies.

IPPNW also writes, that as usual in the atomic industry, we’ll have to reckon with aimed disinformation.

So, I also think the French authorities tell the people, that peoples health is not in danger. That’s what they always say, no matter what happened, cause in an emergency it’s not EdF who pays, it’s the federal state – with our money. So, let’s downplay.

Remember: Total pull-out from atomic power is in the making by the following countries: Austria, Sweden, Italy, Belgium and Germany (2000). Poland stopped it’s construction of an atomic reactor (although they plan a new one in 2020), Ireland stopped the atomic program in their country.

17 of the E.U. countries do have plans for total pull-out.

Uranium is needed for atomic power plants. Uranium has a range of 60 years. If you renew Uranium for re-use in atomic power plants you get radioactive waste materials. The quarrying of 1 ton of Uranium causes 2000 tons of radiative material.

Atomic power is not environmental friendly and it cannot stop climate change.

It’s just another money printer for the industry.

Prepare yourself with easy-reads and contra-atomic information (Made in Germany):

The IAEA which sells pro-atomic ideology around the globe and denies any link between desease / death and high or low radiation for sure supports the opinion of the IEA.

A scenario like this would have drastic changes in energy costs – such as rising Uranium prices. From the 60 year range of Uranium we have today, with 1,300 additional atomic reactors worldwide, the Uranium range would drop to 3 years and the prices will explode more than oil does today (US $ 140 / barrel).

On June 14th 2008 a quake in northern Japan killed several people and injured hundred.

From the atomic power plant Fukushima [map] 3,9 gallons of radioactive water leaked out after the plant was damaged. The atomic power plant Machimure [map] was not damaged – according to the operator company. 30,000 households were without electricity. Source

German atomic power plant operator (3rd largest) EnBW has a problem with Philipsburg [map] – this is known since 2000 / 2001: Reguarly shutdowns because of disturbances there. This time, on June 6th 2008, a leak inside of block 1 was the reason. Reminds on the Krsko accident three days before here.