Share Video:

When two people share the same goals, they can disagree – even strongly disagree – and still have a productive discussion about how to reach those shared objectives. As comedian and author Owen Benjamin explains, the problem with America today is we no longer share the same goals, and that’s tearing us apart.
Donate today to PragerU! http://l.prageru.com/2eB2p0h

If we do, we can disagree—even strongly disagree, and still have a productive discussion. We might even reach a compromise.

But if we don’t share the same goals? Then what?

Then, rhetorically speaking, we’re at war. And only one side can win.

Let me explain.

My parents and brother lean more to the liberal side of the political spectrum than I do. We argue. We slightly nudge each other. We change opinions a little bit. And then we go back to Scrabble.

They were very upset when President Trump withdrew from the Paris climate accords. I was happy. We argued about it, but it was all good because we share the same goals.

We all want clean air and water for our children. We all want to develop clean energy; we want America’s economy to prosper; we want to be less reliant on fossil fuels.

I thought the accords were a bad deal for America. The best way to lower carbon emissions, in my opinion, is to let the free market and American ingenuity loose on the problem. They, in contrast, think the government needs to step in, fund the research, and keep the corporations in line.

Doesn't matter, because we have the same goal: a healthy planet.

We also disagree on gun control. My brother is a little more with me, but my dad wants a lot more regulation because he wants fewer school shootings. So do I. So does my brother. But I believe if a potential killer knew he’d encounter teachers and administrators well-trained in the use of weapons, we’d have less shootings. Different solutions. Shared goal.

I’ve always thought that this is how America is supposed to work. Liberals and conservatives respectfully arguing over the best solution to a shared goal.

But now there’s a third party in the game: the left. And they’re changing the rules.

When I was growing up, the left was on the fringe. But now they’ve moved into the mainstream. They’ve pretty much taken over our educational system. They’re in the media. In corporate HR departments. And, more and more, sad to say, in the Democratic Party.

The left doesn’t share the same goals that liberals and conservatives do. They have a whole different set of goals.

Let me give you some examples.

Raising kids without a gender identity or encouraging them to question their sexual identity. This, to me, is a form of child abuse. I don’t care who’s doing it—parents, teachers, doctors. Their goal is not my goal.

Here’s another one: Demonizing white people and males for the world's problems is not part of my value system. There is no shared goal in that.

I believe in merit and character over race. But now it's cool to say that white males have done all the bad things in the world.

I have two little boys. I get angry just thinking about people telling them they're responsible for racism and sexism—beautiful little children who just dance in the kitchen and smile. So that's not a shared goal.

CORRUPTION 123: THE TV SERIES

IMAGINE LIVING IN A WORLD WHERE ALMOSTEVERY ONE OF THE PUBLIC OFFICIALS THATWERE SUPPOSED TO HELP YOU TURNED OUTTO BE YOUR BUSINESS COMPETITORS.

IMAGINE HAVING THEM USE GOVERNMENTRESOURCES TO PROFIT AT YOUR EXPENSE,BLOCKADE YOU AND TREAT DEMOCRACYLIKE A GARAGE SALE!

THIS IS THAT STORY!

SILICON VALLEY'S POLITICIANS MAKE POLICYTHAT, BOTH, RUINS TAXPAYERS WHILE MAKING THE POLITICIANS RICH BY ARTIFICALLYINFLATING THE VALUE OF THE POLITICIANSSECRET STOCK MARKET HOLDINGS. NOW WEARE EXPOSING THEIR ENTIRE SCAM!

ONE OF THE MOST DETAILED STUDIESOF CORRUPTION EVER CONDUCTED

TV SEGMENTS AND INFORMATIONALBACK-GROUNDERS

USE THE "CATEGORIES" TAB IN THE NAVIGATIONMENU TO SEE YOUR FAVORITE EPISODES

THE PROCESS, SYSTEMS AND CYCLES OF CORRUPTION AND HOW TO INTERDICT THESE KINDS OF CRIMES AGAINST THE PUBLIC

CASE NAME: "CORRUPTION 123"

EACH EPISODE IS PROVIDED IN EASY-TO-VIEW SUB SEGMENTS FORWEB-CASTING PURPOSES AND MOBILE DEVICE EASE OF USE.

HBO AND IT'S AFFILIATED PARTNERS ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THECONTENT OF EACH PRODUCER'S SEGMENT.

THIS TV SERIES HAS ALREADY BEEN SUPPLIED TO EVERY UNITED STATESFEDERAL AGENCY AND EVERY MEMBER OF THE U.S. CONGRESS. THE EUAND MOST EVERY REGULATORY AGENCY OFFICE NOW HAS A COPY OF THIS TV SERIES. WE ENCOURAGE THE PUBLIC TO WATCH THE VIDEOEVIDENCE AND DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES.

All videos on this system are news videos, previously publicly distributed, and compliant with U.S. First Amendment, Freedom-of-the-Press, SLAPP/Anti-SLAPP, Fair-Use Press Rights, PublicDomain Law, GDPR and Human Rights U.N. laws. Any videos not compliant with these ruleswill be removed. This is a public broadcasting WIKI. This site seeks to not track users orviolate their rights. Please submit any court-ready data evidence you uncover, for a reward, that shows that Google is censoring or hiding this site on the web. Many of the videos on thiswiki are hosted, or posted, by Videologists who are members of the religion of Videologywhich is a protected religion under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.