Obama's sex secrets laid bare: How he considered a gay fling, proposed twice to another Women

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
Every president has had wild sex accusations.

And I am sure they deny them when they are untrue or they think they can't be proven, even if they are true.

Had Obama denied Larry's claims, Larry could have filed a defamation suit and had the Sprint phone records he needed to prove his claims made public
through discovery in a civil suit. But I suspect Obama didn't want that.

Well, if we're to take this person's account as factual than clearly all the women that accused Trump of sexual harassment and rape are equally as
credible. And of course, Trump thinks Jeffrey Epstein is a terrific guy:

“I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,” Trump told New York Magazine for a 2002 profile of Epstein. “He’s a lot of fun to be
with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys
his social life.”

The wording of this article says far more than the actual content and exemplifies just how low brow this arserag of a tabloid actually is. A WHITE
woman, ehrmagerd run to the hills middle England, your daughters are next!

Obama was a crap president but who he chose to put his willy into before he got the job shouldn't really be anyone's business. It didn't affect his
ability or inability to do his job.

originally posted by: MagnaCarta2015
Obama was a crap president but who he chose to put his willy into before he got the job shouldn't really be anyone's business. It didn't affect his
ability or inability to do his job.

Eh, I think it did in the case of Larry Sinclair...simply because of the retaliation he met when coming forward:

Obamas past has been highly coveted here on ATS, since he's like a ghost of any real evidence of his past, other than a couple speeches as an adult.
Even his brother Malik is cryptic about it all... I'm convinced this was all a psyop by the C.I.A.

originally posted by: jtma508
Well, if we're to take this person's account as factual than clearly all the women that accused Trump of sexual harassment and rape are equally as
credible. And of course, Trump thinks Jeffrey Epstein is a terrific guy:

“I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,” Trump told New York Magazine for a 2002 profile of Epstein. “He’s a lot of fun to be
with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys
his social life.”

So he's either a pedophile himself or a pedophile sympathizer.

This right here, was one of those big assed red flags that Trumpkins willfully chose to ignore, but never went away for me. This isn't new "fake
news". It has been on the record for years that Trump and Epstein were buddies, Trump himself on the record stating this. In fact, Epstein was one of
those glaring ropes that tied both Trump and Bill Clinton to the world's best known pimp and peddler of young girls. And the links between Epstein and
Trump are hardly casual, either. They seem to run pretty damned solid.

Let's pretend that Obama was gay, or experimented with being gay, or questioned, whatever, when he was in college. let's even say, and it's totally
possible, that he even experimented with other guys, as is the norm in college, from what I hear. Questioning one's own sexuality is actually pretty
damned common for young adults.

I'll repeat it: Who gives a flying %@#$, and why should I even remotely care? The sexual orientations of presidents and other elected officials, real
or imagined, past or present, have zero bearing on their ability to lead, make sound decisions and policy, or do their jobs.

What the hell is it with the obsession certain segments of the conspiracist population that are obsessed with gays and people's private sex lives? As
long as it's two consenting adults, i don't care.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.