Yellow Vests (Gilets jaunes) protesters set fires in the street during clashes with French police forces as part of a demonstration near the Champs Elysees in Paris, France, 08 December 2018. [EPA-EFE/IAN LANGSDON]

A European Commission proposal to phase-out regulated prices of electricity looked set to win approval from EU member states until the ‘yellow vest’ movement swept across France and nipped it in the bud.

Did Emmanuel Macron personally pick up his telephone? Versions diverge, but the ‘yellow vests’ undoubtedly killed all hopes of passing the reform, according to several French sources in Brussels.

“Telephone calls were passed from the Elysée,” affirmed one source in the European Parliament, who explained the gist of the message coming from the French president’s office: in the midst of the protests, any attempt to deregulate electricity prices at EU level is a non-starter.

For Paris, that was the last nail in the coffin. “Politically, the yellow vests episode gave weight to the French position calling for member states to keep the possibility of proposing regulated electricity tariffs,” said a French energy industry source in Brussels.

Regulated energy prices are politically sensitive in France. People there widely perceive them as a necessary shield against abusive practices from energy companies. Brussels, on the other hand, argues they hold back attempts to create a European energy market and discourage investments into cleaner forms of electricity, like wind and solar.

The European Commission’s initial proposal was to phase out regulated electricity prices over a five-year period for all consumers.

Under pressure from Paris and Sofia, the two loudest opponents of the reform, subsequent drafts referred to a phase-out over a seven- or ten-year period for all households.

A possible extension was also considered for specific segments of the population like vulnerable consumers and households in energy poverty, triggering a debate in Brussels about the lack of a common definition of energy poverty across Europe.

The European Commission has renewed its push to phase out regulated electricity prices, arguing they distort the market and slow down the transition to clean energy. But faced with reluctance from EU countries, it has now tabled a compromise based on a common EU definition of energy poverty.

The scope of regulated energy tariffs was even broadened at the last moment to include micro-enterprises in addition to households. The last-minute addition came at the request of Paris to ensure French farmers can also benefit from regulated tariffs, according to a source in the European Parliament.

Martina Werner, a German lawmaker, described the EU agreement as “a big victory” for the Socialists and Democrats (S&D) group in the European Parliament, which came out in support of regulated energy tariffs. “We managed to ensure regulated prices so that member states can guarantee affordable energy prices,” she said in a statement.

In fact, the deal probably went too far for the socialists because it preserves regulated tariffs for all customers, including the wealthiest households. “I would have preferred these [regulated tariffs] to target the more vulnerable and energy-poor households,” Werner admitted, saying “these are the customers who really need it.”

Regulated energy prices have indeed come under fire when they are applied to all customers with no distinction of income.

“This results in a policy that not only fails to target vulnerable and energy poor consumers, but also ends up giving the greatest potential benefit to richer households, as these households are the ones consuming the largest amounts of energy under regulated prices,” said Klaus-Dieter Borchard, a senior official at the European Commission.

Whether it’s for heating their swimming pools or to power their air conditioning systems and home appliances, regulated electricity prices “give the greatest potential benefit to richer households” who consume the largest amounts of energy, says Klaus-Dieter Borchard.

But amid all the noise of the ‘yellow vests’, any argument in favour of reining in regulated tariffs had become inaudible.

“In light of the recent events, notably the ‘yellow vests’ movement in France, it is politically justified to carry on with regulated prices at this stage,” says Florent Marcellesi, a Spanish lawmaker for the Green group in the European Parliament.

“However we should be honest: regulated prices have nothing to do with the protection of the energy poor. We need stronger structural measures to fight energy poverty, notably a large-scale building renovation programme that would allow the most vulnerable part of the population to be kept warm at affordable cost,” Marcellesi told EURACTIV.

Despite those shortcomings, consumer groups continue to see regulated tariffs as a protective shield for vulnerable households.

“Member states should keep the option of regulated prices open,” said Monique Goyens, director general of BEUC, the European consumer organisation. “The argument to get rid of them is not convincing enough as long as energy markets are not truly competitive,” she wrote just before the agreement was passed.

If the energy market fails to deliver affordable prices for those in a vulnerable situation, it should not trample people’s right to live a decent life. A way to limit harm is to avoid prices going too high, writes Monique Goyens.

Lessons for the ‘just transition’

Still, green campaigners believe there are valuable lessons to be learnt from the French protests.

Although it’s tempting to conclude that the ‘yellow vest’ movement is part of a bottom-up backlash against climate action, it rather demonstrates the need for “a fair, just, and managed transition” to sustainable energy, argued Sanjeev Kumar, the founder of Change Partnership, a think tank focused on solving the politics of climate change.

“The yellow vest movement has shown that the energy transition must be socially fair, it cannot penalise the poorest,” agreed Clémence Hutin, climate justice campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe.

“This is why the role of regulated prices must be clarified: they must be designed to protect low-income families who are facing rising energy costs, not subsidise dirty energy,” she told EURACTIV.

Protests against high fuel prices in France have propelled climate policy to the forefront of the political debate, just days before Poland hosts the UN’s annual conference on climate change, with a focus on the “just transition” to low-carbon energy.

Advertisement

Comments

Stop this propaganda, dirty sons of Dr Goebbels!
Your reporter is taking his photo from far behind the police & CRS SS block!!!
A real info does also regard the YW opinion!!!
The fucking greens are nothing but political lobbyists, with a 200.000 £/year rent payed by theirs clients life is easy, even in Brussels.

Hmm, so you don’t like NGOs in Bx? Working through the logic, you would thus prefer the only lobby group in Bx to be business, because after all, business always has the interests of citizens at heart? I don’t agree with everything the Green NGOs say, but I can confirm that what they are paid (on an individual basis) is very modest.

Moving back to the article, we are in “a little bit pregnant” territory here. The EC/EU talks up markets and electricity markets but you do not have a market if you have regulated prices. Given this, all the talk of markets is just that – talk. Ah well, I’m sure the EC/EU is happy being “a little bit pregnant”/having a bit of market.

In the case of energy poverty, as one group noted, actually the problem is poverty and more specifically, the working poor, those who work but are paid a low/insufficient salary. Thus the talk of “vulnerable people” is 100% bullshit – say it the way it is FFS – POOR people who can’t afford things such as food, electricity etc.

As is usually the case in these social matters, the UK has been a leader in building up a population of the “working poor”. Tory-vermin policies have ensured a rise in this social “sector” with Germany starting to catch up (well done Angie – I’m sure you are proud). Tory-vermin politicos (ditto Angie & co) deny that it is a problem. Hmm, is that the AfD I see in the distance? Or on a kinder note, Mr Corbyn in the UK.

Flying the flag for head bangers again I see. It was your lefties that opened the floodgates to cheap labour which has kept wages depressed for 20+ years. Once these peasants are prevented from coming into the country wages will rise otherwise companies will have to go without employees. These peasants struggle to speak English and are a burden on many employers who have to waste time & money teaching them.

A tory-vermin speaks – thus illustrating what I have been saying – thanks Joey. I was on an industrial site in the Uk recently. Most of the workers were Polish – & well paid. As the site manager noted – we are open to British workers but few seem interested. Zero to do with wages, everything to do with attitude – as is shown by the gibberings of Joey.

When will these free market madmen finally retire. It is not just the poorest who need stable prices. It is everybody. Dynamic pricing should only be for energy intensive industries like aluminium melters.