TED GLICK

The Non-Violent Army

For those of us who believe that fundamental change is needed in
the United States and the world, there is a new development that we
all need to welcome, understand, support and work with: the
non-violent army.

The just-concluded protests in Washington, D.C. against the IMF
and the World Bank bore witness to this historic development. Many
thousands of people from across the country followed up successfully
from the November 30, 1999, disruption of the World Trade
Organization in Seattle by focusing the attention of the world on
these two linchpins of the world's corporate-dominated, destructive,
economic and financial system.

A traditional military army is made up at its base primarily of
young people. This is true of the non-violent army of this first
decade of the 21st century; fully 80 to 85 percent or more of those
who blockaded the streets of downtown D.C. were under 25.

A traditional army is organized using platoons, companies,
battalions, brigades and divisions. The non-violent army is organized
on the basis of affinity groups, flying squads, clusters and
slices.

A traditional army is trained in techniques of offense and
defense, expecting to take and inflict casualties. The non-violent
army is learning the techniques of civil disobedience, jail
solidarity and legal issues, while also expecting to face tear gas,
pepper spray, clubs, rubber bullets, horses, arrests or beatings. It
makes no plans for the infliction of casualties on anybody.

Soldiers in traditional armies have uniforms and equipment
appropriate to their situation. The non-violent army uses sneakers,
boots, vinegar-soaked bandanas, eye goggles, ponchos and an
occasional gas mask.

Traditional armies have communications systems in place for those
times when engaged in battle. The non-violent army uses cell phones
and walkie talkies, bicyclists and runners on foot, and a tactical
operations group to re-deploy flying squads and clusters as
needed.

Traditional armies have weapons of destruction. The non-violent
army has weapons of the heart, spirit, mind and organization.

Twice in four and a half months this non-violent army has
mobilized its forces, and it will do so again. Throughout the days of
preparation in D.C. leading up to the April 16th mass disruption, in
evening "spokes council" meetings attended by many hundreds of
people, the leaders of this non-violent army emphasized that as
significant as this one battle was, there was a critical need to
build an on-going movement.

Words cannot do justice to the importance of this development.

This is a new type of movement, in many ways. It is led
predominantly by women. It is deeply committed to democracy, direct
democracy in which the goal is respect for the opinions and input of
all who are part of the movement. It is a movement which sings; one
of the most moving songs has these words: "Rise up, we don't have
long; Come together, keep our movement strong." It integrates art,
dance, humor, theatre, drumming and creativity into its work and
actions. And it tries to operate by consensus.

It is not a movement without weaknesses. The most glaring is its
racial composition. Despite organized and active outreach efforts,
and despite holding its demonstrations and blockades in predominantly
African American Washington, D.C., the percentage of people of color
participating in the meetings and the street actions remained in the
single digits, percentage-wise. Perhaps even more significant, there
were no people of color in major, visible positions of leadership for
and during the street actions.

It is also a movement, a non-violent army, struggling with how to
build a national organizational structure and process based on direct
democracy, consensus and as much decentralization as possible in a
country as big as this one when people are not together in one city
planning for an action. Even when together, the efforts to hammer out
consensus sometimes mean the alienation of those not able to "hang"
with long meetings.

But these weaknesses cannot obscure the fact that the groups under
the Direct Action Network umbrella which worked together on April
16th have provided a jolt of electricity, again, to the progressive
movement, to the country as a whole, and to struggling people the
world over. Through a deeply-felt commitment to taking action to save
our endangered ecosystem and improve the lives of the world's poor,
here and abroad, this non-violent army of thousands is displaying
international solidarity of the highest magnitude. By their
willingness to put their bodies on the line for global justice they
are reminding us all that, indeed, there "ain't no power like the
power of the people, and the power of the people don't stop."

Ted Glick is the National Coordinator of the Independent
Progressive Politics Network, P.O. Box 1041, Bloomfield, N.J. 07003;
phone 973-338-5398; www.ippn.org; although these views are his.