DVDActive uses cookies to remember your actions, such as your answer in the poll. Cookies are
also used by third-parties for statistics, social media and advertising. By using this website, it is
assumed that you agree to this.

Beowulf: Unrated Director's Cut (US - BD)

Gabe Powers takes a second look at the occasionally naked monster killer...

Feature

Based on the epic poem, Beowulf follows the adventures of the title character (portrayed by Ray Winstone) who comes to King Hrothgar’s (Anthony Hopkins) Danish village to kill the tyrant demon Grendel (Crispin Glover). After the braggart Beowulf makes good on his promise he is dispatched to murder Grendel’s evil mother (Angelina Jolie), but the malevolent she-demon has other plans for the arrogant hero.

Every time someone’s attempted to deliver a fully successful adaptation of the ancient epic ‘Beowulf’ things have come up short. Either the adaptation is very loose, as in the case of John McTeirnan’s 13th Warrior, or the adaptation entirely misses the point and lacks a suitable budget, as in the last two in name only, STV adaptations. Robert Zemeckis didn’t strike me as the man for this particular job, but my craving for an adequate adaptation of the story forced me to give the guy a chance.

My distrust of Zemeckis has to do with my general lukewarm feeling towards his films, even the films everyone else loves like Forrest Gump and the Back to the Future series. Zemeckis’ films are not bad films; they just don’t do it for me.

The use of this new fangled motion capture technology is an interesting choice, one that helps Zemeckis to avoid too many unfair comparisons stylistically to Peter Jackson’s action/fantasy defining trilogy. Zemeckis utilizes the technical advantages of having no camera or crew to worry about more effectively here then he did in his last mo-cap feature, the tepid The Polar Express. He squeezes the virtual camera through impossibly small crevasses, swoops across a several mile long valleys in seconds, and focuses on pin sharp reflections without worry of catching the crew in the shot. The human characters still look uncanny—their lips never seem to sync appropriately, and their limbs move too smoothly—but these oddities are quickly assimilated once the story gets rolling. Besides, how else could portly Ray Winstone star as a 6’5” Adonis with nearly supernatural rippling muscles?

The comparisons to the other super-manly and semi-animated feature of 2007, Zach Snyder’s 300, are fair enough. Most folks will probably prefer the splattering red ink and simplistic black and white of Spartan swashbuckling, but the repetition and terrible narration got the better of me upon a second viewing. Beowulf wasn’t as much fun on video where the wackiness of three dimensions is lost, but story, performances, and action doesn’t lose too much bite. Though obviously a visually arresting feature, the film will likely find lasting success in its sense of humour and its genuinely frightening moments. Zemeckis’ use of (fantasy illustrator) Frank Frazetta inspired imagery and comparisons between motion capture and rotoscoping technologies has led me to a more satisfying filmic comparison—producer Ralph Bakshi’s 1983 animated film Fire and Ice.

The film’s suspenseful elements shouldn’t be a surprise to Zemeckis fans, but the sheer volume of graphic and horrific violence is something novel in his repertoire. I have no idea how Beowulf managed to get a PG-13 rating for its theatrical release, as it was easily one of the flat out goriest movies I saw all of 2007. I didn’t catch any major difference in the levels of violence between this ‘director’s cut’ and the theatrical cut—both were as violent as all hell, much to my delight. The visual humour is a less impressive step for Zemeckis—the man that brought us the real life cartoons of Roger Rabbit—but keeping his tongue in his cheek is an effective way to deal with what is ultimately a very silly story. The joke is taken a bit too far during the attack on Grendel, where increasingly ridiculous objects obscure our hero’s crotch. Come on guys, either put the guy in some underwear, or show us his bee-wolf wang and take the R-rating.

The less cartoony humour is likely attributed to co-writers Neil Gaiman and Roger Avery. Gaiman, whose work was also the basis for one of the most overlooked features of 2007, Stardust, is known for his whimsical takes on dark fantasy material. Avery’s work with Tarantino on Pulp Fiction, along with his solo work on Killing Zoë and Rules of Attraction, have all exhibited a brutal and dark sense of humour. The team cleverly deals with the original story’s two and a half act structure by dealing with its characters’ one dimensional nature. By making the character a braggart and a failure on a moral level a (kind of) new third act is created which more or less follows the same themes, and which leads us into the film’s most spectacular set pieces.

And that’s the film’s most obvious problem, though there are some emotionally effective and genuinely funny moments, the whole thing comes down to a series of increasingly exciting action set pieces. Critics have rightfully made comparisons between the eerily computer animated film and video games. Anyone who’s played a videogame in the last dozen or so years will recognize the cut scene to boss battle rhythm, but is this a valid criticism, or is Beowulf a valid comment on modern videogame entertainment? I’m not sure, but as technology and audience sophistication continues to grow I can’t help but assume that his is the future of popular cinema, whether we like it or not.

Video

* I noticed no difference between the HD DVD and Blu-ray releases. This section pertains to both.

Well, I’m not sure what most of you were expecting from a high definition release of an entirely digital film, but I was expecting perfection. It’s nice to have one’s expectations met. Beowulf pushes my aging television’s specs to their limit. The disc’s clarity is so severe that it causes injury to the film. The already eerily crafted characters appear almost plasticine. The textures of the creatures, on the other hand, are done great justice. The film’s colour pallet is purposefully pretty limited per scene to either warm and shiny golds or glowing baby blues. Both pallets are bright and noiseless, and punch well when accentuated with blood reds. There isn’t anything I can complain about here other then the fact that my television can’t get any brighter and that one dead pixel looks larger than ever now.

Audio

All of my problems with the compressed volume levels of the HD DVD’s Dolby Digital Plus track are magically erased by the Blu-ray’s choice of a Dolby TrueHD track. This is the ear splittingly aggressive surround track I heard when I saw the film in theatres last Thanksgiving. The centre channel is still a bit overbearing, but all in all the mix is noticeably wider in scope, and the decreased compression allows for sharper and better separated elements. Alan Silvestri’s score (which is impressive and very ‘Alan Silvestrian’) gets its bump, and now blends well with the bombastic action. A definitive improvement.

Extras

I’m still unable to view any of the web-enabled extras on the first disc of this two-disc set, and the ‘In the Volume’ picture in picture option is not an option on this particular Blu-ray player. I can still review it, assuming it’s the same feature that graced the more interactively-abled HD DVD. There isn’t any interview footage or commentary in the tiny screen, just a bunch of behind the scenes footage and rough animatic animation. Those that enjoyed watching the 300 green screen footage will likely have even more fun watching big movie stars wearing unflattering, skin tight scuba gear with grey dots all over their faces.

The rest of the extras match the HD DVD.

High definition disc number two begins with ‘A Hero’s Journey’, a look at the ‘filming’ of this state of the art motion picture. The volume of work that went into this project is pretty mind boggling in technical terms, but when compared to the physical effort and manpower that goes into something like Lord of the Rings one can easily understand Zemeckis likes making special effects blockbusters this way. The first shock is how quickly the filming process is. Camera set-ups are reduced to mere minutes of sensor calibration, and set construction is timed to fifteen minutes or less. Zemeckis is able to get more than double the average amount of takes for a sizably budgeted feature. The featurette is amusing and informative, but runs under thirty minutes, which doesn’t quite cut it in this information age. Okay, not really.

The featurette adds a special trivia mode which includes on-screen pop-up factoids and links to the disc’s additional featurettes. The pop-up facts come hard and fast, so if you’re trying to keep track of the featurette’s dialogue and this additional text info it’s a little overwhelming. The extra featurettes total ten, run about twenty-one minutes total, and can also be accessed via the main screen under ‘The Journey Continues’. These are mostly brief, deeper looks into things touched on during ‘A Hero’s Journey’.

‘Beasts of Burden’ is a featurette covering the design of the film’s monsters, Grendel, Grendel’s mother, the sea monsters and the Dragon. I won’t mince words here, Andy Sherkis’ Gollum is the best motion captured performance ever, and probably will be for a long time, but hiring Crispin Glover to play the tortured monster Grendel verges on genius on Zemeckis’ part. The physical manifestation of the creature is fantastically original and disgustingly realized. There is a touch of that Gollum patheticness, but overall the Old English spouting character is one of the film’s strongest and most memorable elements. Grendel’s Mother is something I’m not so fond of (I just don’t get the liquid gold thing), but it’s another memorable and original element, and is in keeping with Zemeckis’ Frank Frazetta inspired visuals. Though very informative to the process and such, the featurette is a bit of a disappointment at only seven minutes, though it ends up being one of the longest extras on the disc.

Another group of featurettes starts with ‘The Origins of Beowulf’, which is another super short featurette that should’ve been longer. In about five minutes Roger Avery and Neil Gaiman run down their changes to the original story, and Zemeckis explains how he was brought onto the project. As a little aside, I’m not a very big fan of Gaiman’s work on the whole, but I’ve got to say that I’d love to just sit and talk with the guy someday, he strikes me as unbelievably warm and good natured. ‘Creating the Ultimate Beowulf’ is one of the only places on the disc where the huge schism between actor Ray Winstone and the physical representation of Beowulf. Besides this it doesn’t do much, at a minute and a half. It probably won’t surprise anyone when I tell you that ‘The Art of Beowulf’ is about the art of Beowulf. This is more or less the only time that anyone mentions the fact that the film was originally meant to be seen in 3D, and otherwise covers some of the concept art and model work. It runs about five minutes.

‘A Conversation with Robert Zemeckis’ is an interview session as posed by USC students. This is the closest we get to a director’s commentary track. The questions are super soft balls in the sense that they’re obvious, but the answers are spot on. Zemeckis will likely be called all manner of bad names by various industry big wigs for his love of this approach to filmmaking, but I’m very impressed with his willingness to risk failure through experimentation. I’m looking forward to more of these from him (might I suggest an adaptation of Jeff Smith’s ‘Bone’ comic series?). The talking head nature of the interview is visually dull (maybe it should’ve been spiced up with some behind the scenes or film footage), and runs about ten minutes.

The disc also houses nine deleted scenes and two alternate scenes. These are presented in rough digital pre-viz form, with very little detail, almost no sound effects, a temp score and what appears to be finished dialogue performances, with a few minor exceptions. One can’t blame the filmmakers for cutting these scenes at such an early stage considering the cost of finishing them. The cuts are all appropriate for the films pacing, but none of them would’ve been wildly inappropriate if left in either (including yet another penis joke). The scenes run a whopping thirteen minutes.

Overall

Beowulf probably isn’t your High School English teacher’s idea of classic literary entertainment, but it’s hard to deny the visceral effect. The technology hasn’t made it to an entirely acceptable level just yet, but overrated filmmaker Robert Zemeckis shows successful growth in the format, and range as a director. It’s forgettable and weak in sections, but a thrill for those in the right state of mind. The Blu-ray disc isn’t a visual improvement on the HD DVD, and the extras are the same (though some of them probably won’t work for everyone), but The Dolby TrueHD track is a pretty big improvement. My 7/10 film rating is a bit of a lie, I'd probably put it somewhere around 6.5/10 if I could.

* Note: The images on this page are not representative of the Blu-ray release.

Advertisements

Comments

Reply

Message

Enter the message here then press submit. The username, password and message are required. Please make the message constructive, you are fully responsible for the legality of anything you contribute. Terms & conditions apply.

I wouldn't say I hated the film but I would say that I was kind of bored. I was expecting a dumb-dumb action flick and I got it but there was something...missing, maybe? I just couldn't get into it and by the end I was just rolling my eyes at its bravado.

I think I want to say that it was uninspired more than anything else; at no point in it did I feel like I was being pulled in, except perhaps during the scenes up until Grendel's death and the first two encounters perhaps with his mother. Afterwards, I was left expecting something that just didn't come. Something...I don't know. I haven't watched the film since last year so I honestly don't remember exactly. I wouldn't say I hated it but it certainly was a disappointment if you looked at it as a film co-written by Neil Gaiman.

Sam Spade wrote: I did not enjoy Beowulf as a whole. Only one scene out of the whole thing thrilled me: when Beowulf fights the dragon. That was simply amazing. Plus the characters looked like puppets in parts. The animation was better in The Polar Express. I did enjoy the strange camera angles and how dark it was too.

I was put off by the animation in many scenes, but once in battle it was a great sight.

Sam Spade wrote: I did not enjoy Beowulf as a whole. Only one scene out of the whole thing thrilled me: when Beowulf fights the dragon. That was simply amazing. Plus the characters looked like puppets in parts. The animation was better in The Polar Express. I did enjoy the strange camera angles and how dark it was too.

This was an enjoyable cinematic adventure in 3D. I'm not so sure it would be that way in 2D. It would probably be enjoyable in 2D but there's that novelty of the new 3D. I thought Beowulf was put together rather decently and the cast was appropriate for the story. Much like any literary classic re-envisioned, those who attempt a retelling must endure critics who may or may not perceive the liberties needing to be addressed when trying to capture a modern audience.

I did not enjoy Beowulf as a whole. Only one scene out of the whole thing thrilled me: when Beowulf fights the dragon. That was simply amazing. Plus the characters looked like puppets in parts. The animation was better in The Polar Express. I did enjoy the strange camera angles and how dark it was too.

knight d wrote: Why are we still talking about this movie? Even last year I had no interest in it. The Polar Express was more entertaining! Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't get the memo. I'll start running all my review copies by you from now on, make sure they make the grade.

Definitely the best and most faithful 'Beowulf' film adaptation ever but still deterred from the story. The changes were something I didn't like at first, but after the second and third viewings, they have grown on me. I'm just pleased that they stuck to all of the main points of the poem. The first Grendel attack was superbly done. The fight scenes were great. The dragon scene is a masterpiece.

I'm definitely going to pick up the Blu-ray to see all the above and his glorious CG buttocks in high-def :-)

Pixarfan517 wrote: I THOUGHT THIS MOVIE WAS SUCK!!! IT WASTED MY *beep* TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Are you mentally deficient? You honestly can't think that sentence made sense?

horrorfan25 wrote: I didn't think it was fantastic but it was good for what it was. But seriously studios have got to stop using the 'unrated' or 'director's cut' banner because it's the same film but just longer. That's kind of the point, isn't it?

i just bought the blu-ray so its good to know the image quality is still amazing. its not an awesome movie that blew me away but i liked it for what it was. i was able to get passed the "deadness" of the faces fine but i gotta say, til the very end it bothered me that while the others totally looked like the actors, robin wright penn looked nothing like her...not sure why it bugged me but yeah. lol