I've entered a music competition being run by (let's call them) FamousBrand. FamousBrand are using (let's call them) AudioSchmodio facilities to run the competition - upload entries, etc. The competition rules state that:

(a) you must fully comply with all rules
(b) your entry is all your own work
(c) you must use the audio samples of Famous Artist provided by FamousBrand in your entry
(d) you have no rights to the samples other than for the entry, and no rights to further distribute them or the entry
(e) you pass all IP rights in your entry to FamousBrand

In addition, to use AudioSchmodio facilities you must agree to:

(f) not 'artificially enhance' the amount of plays you get via the AudioSchmodio facilities.

Within a couple of weeks of the competition starting there were already folks entering tracks that had been published before the competition audio samples were available, so it's hard to see how they could avoid breaking rule (c).

Other tracks were remixes of established chart artists' tracks, fully crediting the original artists, so not 'all their own work', and again published before the competition samples were available. There goes (b).

Entries were being offered for both free and paid download with open Creative Commons licences on them that claimed credit for the entrant, but no mention of the samples' owners or their rights or of Famous Artist. That's (d) and (e) gone.

Early in the competition entrants were spotted who had several AudioSchmodio accounts - for their different recording aliases, their company, and so on. They openly used the different accounts to play and even congratulate themselves on the great remix they'd done. There's (f) broken too.

(Others gained 'plays' at exactly the maximum rate they could be played by one person, over and over, for several hours until it was pointed out to them that they'd been rumbled - at which point the plays decreased significantly.)

The competition has been running for months, and I made FamousBrand aware of these problems a couple of weeks in. They replied that they'd investigate. They took action on some entrants, forcing them to stop offering downloads - but more people entered, and they started offering downloads again. FamousBrand said I should expect action 'soon' on the people breaking the rules. They said that those that broke the rules would not go forward to the judges.

A week before it closed, I reminded them, and pointed out that about half the entrants were still breaking one or more of their rules. They haven't replied.

They've now stated publically that ALL the entries will go forward to be judged.

If I entered a competition that demanded three proofs-of-purchase for entry and I only provided two, I'd get disqualified - but here, I'm watching people that have ignored the requirements, the artistic constraints and problems of having to use the Famous Artist samples, being allowed to enter and be judged equally.

If I handed in an essay at college and had plagiarised the text, I'd get punished, but here people are claiming other's works - both the samples AND the tunes and lyrics - as their own without penalty.

If I ran for mayor and got caught stuffing made-up votes into a ballot box I'd get disqualified and arrested - but here, people are making their tracks look more popular without any comeback.

I'm torn about going public with this. Do I (A) try to shame FamousBrand into cleaning up the competition, or (B) keep quiet?

The worry is that moment I open my mouth about it FamousBrand are likely to get extremely embarrassed and so annoyed, and there goes any chance I have of possibly winning the competition.

I'm also torn about timing if I do choose to go public - do I (C) do it now, and scupper my own chances, or (D) wait until after, but then it'll maybe just look like sour grapes?

I'd ignore the contest, the brand, and everything about it. If it's all a big mess, it's not worth another second of my time. I wouldn't bother trying to report anyone, either. If the brand isn't capable of weeding out invalid entries - or perhaps if they don't even care - then again, not worth my time._________________AudiodefSynthetronicaGentoo Studio

This is most likely not a competition you would want to touch anyway. That being said, you should publish the details + the name of the famous brand. There is no point to have competitions if the party that arranges the whole thing also ignores the the rules they themselves made.
As for the brand itself.. that means nothing as the whole thing is a promotion event anyway and you are not dealing with real people here, but instead these are social media marketing experts._________________A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"

I would wait and see who they pick. If it's one of the suspect entries and especially if it's one you told them about early on, call them out on it. On a public forum or YouTube. Just make sure your facts are solid.

I personally believe most of these competitions are rigged anyways. Still, it can help other people down the line avoid wasting time with FamousBrand contests and products._________________Dave
www.davesneed.comwww.myspace.com/desneed

Thanks for all the helpful advice, which basically had a common theme of 'put it out your mind and move one', The only real difference was whether I should also name names - like me, you seem evenly split on that.

I took your advice to heart, and spent the last month ignoring the contest and getting one with writing and recording new stuff.

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot vote in polls in this forumYou cannot attach files in this forumYou can download files in this forum

Please support our site. If you click through and buy from our affiliate partners, we earn a small commission.