It's very low chance i can find smth after bubble, but i'll offer some suggestions, maybe you'll find them a bit useful.

[Raindrop]

00:42:823 (224,240) - maybe someone already suggested that, but what about making that stream as ddkk-type? I think it follows music more.

01:34:251 (51) - sound is long as 01:34:509 (54) - (i mean even pattern of two kats), did you think about making 01:34:251 (51) - kat? Plus if we compare with that sound before at 01:33:823 (47,51) - , here you mapped two kats. It's unnecessary of course, just suggested.

01:43:423 - won't don here fill the 1/3 sound gap?

02:09:137 (114) - did you do that for variability? Because i can't hear kat here :0

02:21:566 (225,241) - if you changed first stream - here is second.

02:42:309 (11,12,13,17,18,19) - can't find difference between them as sounds, but i think you made them again for variability? Another suggesstion here : 02:42:137 (10,11,12,13) - clicking triple after strong and loud beat is very cool, so why not move 02:43:251 - that to 02:43:080 - and make it don to follow rhythmics of that part?

02:43:509 (19,6) - just mentioning another stream, if you decided to change.

03:45:480 (6) - kat?

04:11:280 (3,19) - streaaaam.

04:33:223 (20,5) - ^.

Very polished map. I can't call that even like 'mod', just list of subjective fixes, lol.Anyway, good luck with that owo

Remus wrote:

Hi gaston o/

It's very low chance i can find smth after bubble, but i'll offer some suggestions, maybe you'll find them a bit useful. Never mind, your opinion also counts

[Raindrop]

00:42:823 (224,240) - maybe someone already suggested that, but what about making that stream as ddkk-type? I think it follows music more.No, you're the first to suggest this to me. You're right, follow the synthesizer more, but I do not like it, the sound is kind of weird. I try to follow the melody I was following in 00:26:709 (105,110,115) -

01:34:251 (51) - sound is long as 01:34:509 (54) - (i mean even pattern of two kats), did you think about making 01:34:251 (51) - kat? Plus if we compare with that sound before at 01:33:823 (47,51) - , here you mapped two kats. It's unnecessary of course, just suggested. I do not think so, I hear this note 01:34:251 (51) - lower than 01:34:509 (54) -. Also the kick falls there

02:09:137 (114) - did you do that for variability? Because i can't hear kat here :0 Yeah, varability. Maybe I'll change these notes

02:21:566 (225,241) - if you changed first stream - here is second. Nope

02:42:309 (11,12,13,17,18,19) - can't find difference between them as sounds, but i think you made them again for variability? Another suggesstion here : 02:42:137 (10,11,12,13) - clicking triple after strong and loud beat is very cool, so why not move 02:43:251 - that to 02:43:080 - and make it don to follow rhythmics of that part? Maybe for variability, but I follow with de kkd this sound 02:32:880 (314,319,324) - . I thought add don in 02:41:709 - but i'm not sure

02:43:509 (19,6) - just mentioning another stream, if you decided to change. Nope x2

00:47:794 - 00:48:137 - 00:53:280 - 00:53:623 - For better flow, It needs to put a note there, in my opinion. Current pattern feels like there is no something which should be.

01:20:023 (108,109,110,111,112,113) - It seems slightly different with the style as you mapped in this part. Being followed the melody, It would be better to use the pattern based on o_oo_oo, in my opinion.

01:30:994 (23,24,25,26,27,28) - Similar as above.

01:39:051 (103) - 02:00:994 (46) - I think, It should be changed to d because of some reasons:

Actually, lower sound than next note.

Considering the previous stream, not enough to emphasize, I think.

On the similar sound such as 02:22:937 and 02:22:937, mapped to don.

02:09:051 (113,114,115,116,117) - It would be better starting to k for consistency.

Sylphi wrote:

via modding queue

[Raindrop]

00:47:794 - 00:48:137 - 00:53:280 - 00:53:623 - For better flow, It needs to put a note there, in my opinion. Current pattern feels like there is no something which should be. I follow only the piano here. You're right, it feels a bit empty. I'll see if I can add some notes

01:20:023 (108,109,110,111,112,113) - It seems slightly different with the style as you mapped in this part. Being followed the melody, It would be better to use the pattern based on o_oo_oo, in my opinion. I don't like how it sounds . I think the current pattern follow better with the pitch

01:30:994 (23,24,25,26,27,28) - Similar as above. ^

01:39:051 (103) - 02:00:994 (46) - I think, It should be changed to d because of some reasons:

Actually, lower sound than next note.

Considering the previous stream, not enough to emphasize, I think.

On the similar sound such as 02:22:937 and 02:22:937, mapped to don.

Yeah, changed with finisher to emphasizes the kick

02:09:051 (113,114,115,116,117) - It would be better starting to k for consistency. Yeah, I thought a other pattern and changed this

02:41:280 (4,5,6) - 02:42:651 (14,15,16) - k d k for consistency? Consistency with what thing? This is the same than 00:40:594 (208,209,210,218,219,220) -

404 AccNotFound wrote:

iloveyou4ever wrote:

iloveyou4ever wrote:

Best of 2017

Agree

Hi again~Might be rejected all uwu

[Raindrop]00:12:651 / 00:18:137 - A clearly finisher sounds stands here. Might place K00:37:337 - Another clearly finisher sounds here. Use finisher here for the consistency of 00:40:08001:10:937 - Change to k , similar pitch to 01:10:42302:07:423 (97,98) - Ctrl+G , Seems like the pitch that you have emphasize so far by using k like 01:55:937 / 02:07:166 are stands on 02:07:423 , make it as k might be better for the overall consistency.02:15:823 - Add a note here might be cool , there is a pitch on here too.04:46:937 / 04:52:423 - Yes , a noticeable finisher sound here, might consider to add a finisher note here. uwu04:52:937 - d , let's have a look on 00:07:680

Tyistiana wrote:

iloveyou4ever wrote:

Best of 2017

Agree

Hi again~Might be rejected all uwu

[Raindrop]00:12:651 / 00:18:137 - A clearly finisher sounds stands here. Might place K00:37:337 - Another clearly finisher sounds here. Use finisher here for the consistency of 00:40:080 I considered add the finisher, but idk why I don't added before xD01:10:937 - Change to k , similar pitch to 01:10:423 I changed the pattern to accept this02:07:423 (97,98) - Ctrl+G , Seems like the pitch that you have emphasize so far by using k like 01:55:937 / 02:07:166 are stands on 02:07:423 , make it as k might be better for the overall consistency. You're right, fixed02:15:823 - Add a note here might be cool , there is a pitch on here too. I follow the instrumental here, don't the melody04:46:937 / 04:52:423 - Yes , a noticeable finisher sound here, might consider to add a finisher note here. uwu Added04:52:937 - d , let's have a look on 00:07:680 ? Doens't this 00:18:651 (68) - ? I use copy-paste and those note is kat