On 02/28/2011 05:35 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On 02/28/2011 04:11 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>>
>>> The point that is being made here is that your CP introduces the
>>> problem anew in HTML. If the chairs adopt the proposal as written, I
>>> would expect to subsequently file bugs to fix the proposal to actually
>>> be well-defined again. (Since I do not think that the proposal is an
>>> improvement to the Web, however, I have not spent the time to work out
>>> how one would go about doing that yet.)
>>
>> Does Philip's stated objection sufficiently cover this point?
>
> No idea.
In which case I encourage you (and everybody, for that matter) to ensure
that whatever points you feel need to be made here are made (or
referenced) by the survey itself.
Reminder: this poll closes in just under 6 hours:
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-124-objection-poll/
- Sam Ruby