‘If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.’ -- Sun Tzu, The Art of War

‘If
you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of
a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every
victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the
enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.’ -- Sun
Tzu, The
Art of War

This
is part7
of my confusion series on trying to think for myself. It is a bloody
confusing exercise which I wouldn't wish to inflict even upon my most
despicable enemies – they already think plenty for themselves.
See earlier episodes here: part1,
part2,
part3,
part4,
part5,
and part6.
This is the final episode as I have promised myself to no longer be
plagued by this curse of independent thought. The comfort of
following the experts, the know-it-all “illumined ones”
from the vast spectrum of leaders offered to the plebes, is much more
opiatic, if not completely soothing to the soul. A dead intellect is
the best one for the sheep – and of course, the shepherds
delight.

I
begin by reproducing the famous 1899 poem, The White man's Burden,
by Rudyard Kipling. Its full title in syncopation with the actual
white man's burden of the time, actually was: “The
White Man’s Burden: The United States and The Philippine
Islands”. And it went like this:

Take up the
White Man's burden--In patience to abide,To veil the threat
of terrorAnd check the show of pride;By open speech and
simple,An hundred times made plainTo seek another's
profit,And work another's gain.

Take up the White Man's
burden--The savage wars of peace--Fill full the mouth of
FamineAnd bid the sickness cease;And when your goal is
nearestThe end for others sought,Watch sloth and heathen
FollyBring all your hopes to nought.

Take up the White
Man's burden--No tawdry rule of kings,But toil of serf and
sweeper--The tale of common things.The ports ye shall not
enter,The roads ye shall not tread,Go mark them with your
living,And mark them with your dead.

Take up the White
Man's burden--And reap his old reward:The blame of those ye
better,The hate of those ye guard--The cry of hosts ye
humour(Ah, slowly!) toward the light:--"Why brought he
us from bondage,Our loved Egyptian night?"

'In
February 1899, British novelist and poet Rudyard Kipling wrote a poem
entitled “The White Man’s Burden: The United States and
The Philippine Islands.” In this poem, Kipling urged the U.S.
to take up the “burden” of empire, as had Britain and
other European nations. Published in the February, 1899 issue of
McClure’s Magazine, the poem coincided with the
beginning of the Philippine-American War and U.S. Senate ratification
of the treaty that placed Puerto Rico, Guam, Cuba, and the
Philippines under American control. Theodore Roosevelt, soon to
become vice-president and then president, copied the poem and sent it
to his friend, Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, commenting that it was
“rather poor poetry, but good sense from the expansion point of
view.” Not everyone was as favorably impressed as Roosevelt.
The racialized notion of the “White Man’s burden”
became a euphemism for imperialism, and many anti-imperialists
couched their opposition in reaction to the phrase.' --- Source

Because
history matters so much – both for understanding the present
for the thought bearing, and for confounding the present for the
uninitiated in order to get them 'United We Stand', not to
mention for forging the future, any future, both good and bad –
that Zbigniew Brzezinski had so astutely observed in The Grand
Chessboard in 1996:

“The
earlier empires were built by aristocratic political elites and were
in most cases ruled by essentially authoritarian or absolutist
regimes. The bulk of the populations of the imperial states were
either politically indifferent, ... or infected by imperialist
emotions ...a quest for national glory, 'the white man's burden', 'la
mission civilisatrice', not to speak of the opportunities for
personal profit – all served to mobilize support for imperial
adventures to sustain essentially hierarchical imperial power
pyramids. The attitude of American public toward the external
projection of American power has been more ambivalent. The public
supported America's engagement in WWII largely because of the shock
effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. .... After the Cold
War had ended, the emergence of the United States as the single
global power did not evoke much public gloating but rather elicited
an inclination toward more limited definitions of American
responsibilities abroad. Public opinion polls conducted in 1995 –
1996 indicated a general public preference for 'sharing' power with
others, rather than for its monopolistic exercise.” (24,25)

“It
is also a fact that America is too democratic at home to be
autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America's power, especially
its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a populist
democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of power
is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of
a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of domestic
well-being. The economic self-denial (that is defense spending), and
the human sacrifice (casualties even among professional soldiers)
required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts.
Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization.” (35,36)

“Public
opinion polls suggest that only a small minority (13 percent) of
Americans favor the proposition that 'as the sole remaining
superpower, the US should continue to be the preeminent world leader
in solving international problems'. ... Moreover, as America becomes
an increasingly multicultural society, it may find it more difficult
to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the
circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external
threat. .... More generally, cultural change in America may also be
uncongenial to the sustained exercise abroad of genuinely imperial
power. That exercise requires a high degree of doctrinal motivation,
intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification. ... Mass
communications have been playing a particularly important role in
that regard, generating a strong revulsion against any selective use
of force that entails even low levels of casualties .... In brief,
the U.S. Policy goals must be un-apologetically twofold: to
perpetuate America's own dominant position for at least a generation
and preferably longer,...” (211-215)

So,
how to embark on “imperial mobilization” when the
American white man (and the Western white man in
general) are no longer themselves “infected by imperialist
emotions ...a quest for national glory, 'the white man's burden', 'la
mission civilisatrice',” kept engaged, and ensnared, as
they all are, in chasing their respective 'American Dreams'?
Which, for the vast majority of 'white trash' among them, have
their dollars, pounds, and euros, sucked out of their pockets even
before it can reach their dinner tables and their perpetual debt
collectors? The political science principle of achieving “imperial
mobilization” under such conditions is to engineer consent
– just as one might engineer technology, or engineer the voyage
to the moon. It takes a great deal of expertise, and very deep
pockets. This social technology is examined in the Preamble of my
2008 report Weapons
of Mass Deception,
where it is explained how consent, as well as dissent, both must to
be manufactured in order to be effective, employing different
categories of deceptions tailored to the different audiences and
their mental acumen.

This
variance of having a differing audience, also necessitates making the
manufacturing process, and its products, different at every level.
From simple big lies for the vast majority, to complex layered ones
which mix verifiable empirical truths, half-truths, and outright lies
characterized by clever omissions, layer by layer, so that the
remaining few, as well as institutions and organizations with
group-think, can also find something believable to suit their own
individual propensities. Myths and mantras are cleverly fabricated
and presented to each audience according to their own limited world
views and selfish priorities which are often shared with their
respective political, social, cultural, and religious groups. These
engineered myths and mantras always motivate people to act in
accordance with those implanted beliefs. The end result being that
the history's
actors
are able to get away Machiavellianly sowing their irreversible faits
accomplis amidst all the confusions which follow.

Different
and often opposing myths also naturally seed the interesting
Technique of Infamy among antagonist domestic groups, keeping
people and cabals fully embroiled in vehemently debating who is
right, who knows more, who is more intelligent, who is more pious,
who is more peaceable, who is the avantgarde in thought and who are
the sheep, etc. Such opposing “truths” deftly implanted
among groups automatically enables setting one group against another
– political philosopher Hegel's recipe for creating new order
from old by orchestrating the continuous clash of the opposites known
as Hegelian Dialectic – and we see this false Left--Right
political paradigm orchestrated along those very lines, with almost
an infinite layers in between, for that very purpose. And in the
limit, internationally, it enables seeding total wars among nations –
the key Machiavellian modus operandi for tearing down any old world
order to create a new world order. Very powerful stuff. Such
confabulations, hegelian mind-fcks I call them, were examined in
depth in my essay on the Mighty Wurlitzer and the power of crafting
enabling myths: Wikileaks
and Imperial Mobilization.

My
essay Unlayering
the Middle East War Agenda: Making Sense of Absurdities
demonstrated that Brzezinski's prima facie motivation for inflicting
American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives upon the
world as expressed in The Grand Chessboard, which was
chauvinistically stated as: “to
perpetuate America's own dominant position for at least a generation
and preferably longer,”
was itself only a motivating myth. It was necessary for motivating
America's vast military-industrial complex and the Pentagon warriors
who all thrive on even small wars, and therefore would just love the
idea of thriving endlessly in a Total War waged endlessly, the World
War IV that will last “at least a generation and preferably
longer,”.

The
nihilistic notion of Total War similarly pushed by
Brzezinski's confrere, Michael Ledeen, ostensibly to usher in regime
changes throughout the New Middle East, is similarly absurd when one
pauses to reflect that the old Middle East – ripe with
installed dictators and implanted kingdoms oppressing their own
peoples in service to the sole superpower along artificially
contrived borders carved out from the remnants of the Ottoman empire
at the conclusion of World War I – is entirely the
orchestration of the same imperial masters now advocating the next
cycle of regime changes:

“No
stages. This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies.
There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are
going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq… this is
entirely the wrong way to go about it. If we just let our vision of
the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don’t try
to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war…
our children will sing great songs about us years from now.” --
Michael Ledeen, speaking at the AEI (American Enterprise Institute),
10/29/2001,
source

Why
is Ledeen selling Total War? For the same covert motivation
Zbigniew Brzezinski is selling America's preeminence in The Grand
Chessboard. Everyone in the military-industrial complex is sold
what they want to hear. But the real intent behind the chauvinism, as
empiricism testifies, is to bankrupt America, to demoralize its
public, while sowing chaos and destruction in the previous world
order they had themselves established after the two World Wars.
Disguised in polished vernacular and under the farcical pretext of
regime changes, is the nihilism to seed chaos and demoralization
among the public throughout the world. This is even apparent when one
un-layers Michael Ledeen even with an ounce of forensic thinking,
especially in the light of empiricism:

“Creative
destruction is our middle name, both within our own society and
abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to
science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and
the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and
creativity, which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and
shames them for their inability to keep pace. Seeing America undo
traditional societies, they fear us, for they do not wish to be
undone. They cannot feel secure so long as we are there, for our very
existence—our existence, not our politics—threatens their
legitimacy. They must attack us in order to survive, just as we must
destroy them to advance our historic mission.” -- Michael A.
Ledeen, The War Against The Terror Masters: Why It Happened. Where We
Are Now. Wow We'll Win, 2003, pgs.
212-213

The
agenda behind constructing all these “revolutionary times”
along Zbigniew Brzezinski's “arc of crisis” using
Michael Ledeen's “total war” for “creative
destruction” wherein, the children of the white man,
in Ledeen's own words: “our children will sing great songs
about us years from now”, is to make the final push for the
globalists' one-world government. The white man has very clearly
understood that which most 'untermenschen' have not, in David Ben
Gurion's own words: “what is inconceivable in normal times
is possible in revolutionary times”!

To
launch this renewed white man's burden for world government,
entirely through deception, many many ruses, and many many peoples,
from mercenaries to patsies, from manufactured ideologues to
fabricated stooges, and from all walks of life and profession have
been engaged.

Infiltrations
are at every level, from physical to cognitive as per the old
COINTELPRO style, and even at the level of the sub-conscious mind
through both flag-waiving indoctrinations, and propaganda techniques
pioneered by Edward Bernays. The latter had been successfully
utilized by him to wage psy-op wars upon the peoples of all nations
throughout World War I and World War II. Now refined to the level of
science, this art of persuasion has been taken to new heights.

So,
we have the Zionist Jews murdering the Palestinians to the sound of
their trumpet while urging the superpower to wage endless war upon
the world – the so called neo-cons. Then we have the American
and its Allied Christian soldiers murdering the Iraqis, Afghanis, and
Pakistanis, in large numbers, and again to the sound of even greater
trumpets. Today, the blame for this Total War is entirely laid
at the doorstep of the Jewish neo-cons who have visibly taken over
almost all of the United States Government which is evidently being
run from Tel Aviv.

But,
is this mission of Total War through Total Deception
hell of a lot different from the white man's burden of the not
too distant past, when plain folks, quite genuinely “infected
by imperialist emotions ...a quest for national glory, 'the white
man's burden', 'la mission civilisatrice', not to speak of the
opportunities for personal profit – all served to mobilize
support for imperial adventures to sustain essentially hierarchical
imperial power pyramids.”?

The
settlement of the Americas by genociding its native inhabitants, is
the best example of genocide of the indigenous peoples as the noble
Christian white man's burden. The conquest of the sea trade
routes by the East India Company and the physical colonization of the
Indian subcontinent, is the best example of colonizing an indigenous
peoples into subservient bondage to the noble Christian white man's
la mission civilisatrice. The unfortunate native populations
of the Americas, Australia, etc., weren't so fortunate, as the noble
Bible thumping white man actually coveted their land. In India they
only coveted her vast riches – the Jewel in their crown!

Well,
that same exercise with only minor syntactic sugaring, is being
inflicted by the holy Jews and noble atheistic soldiers of
irredentist Zion upon the 'untermenschen' of Palestine today. Is it
much different? Not according to the two Christian and Jewish
statesmen, respective leaders of their nations. On the festive
and felicitous occasion of the 60th anniversary of Israel's existence
which was celebrated with much fanfare from Tel Aviv to Washington
D.C., President George W. Bush along with his notable wife landed at
Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion airport on May 14, 2008, to the warm greetings
of Shimon Perez:

“Welcome
to the new Israel: Three thousand years old, and going on sixty”

President
Bush had effusively replied:

“Our
two nations both faced great challenges when they were founded. And
our two nations have both relied on the same principles to help us
succeed. We built strong democracies to protect the freedoms given to
us by an Almighty God”

And
the late Tanya Reinhart,
the Leftist Jew and respected dissent chief of many a rebel, made the
exact same comparison after she experienced her metanoia and
tried to explain to the world the indoctrination and false
justifications she was infected with while growing up as a Zionist in
Israel:

“The
state of Israel founded in 1948 following a war which the Israelis
call the War of Independence, and the Palestinians call the Nakba –
the catastrophe. A haunted, persecuted people sought to find a
shelter and a state for itself, and did so at a horrible price to
another people. During the war of 1948, more than half of the
Palestinian population at the time – 1,380,000 people –
were driven off their homeland by the Israeli army. Though Israel
officially claimed that a majority of refugees fled and were not
expelled, it still refused to allow them to return, as a UN
resolution demanded shortly after 1948 war. Thus, the Israeli land
was obtained through ethnic cleansing of the indigenous Palestinian
inhabitants. This is not a process unfamiliar in history. Israel's
actions remain incomparable to the massive ethnic cleansing of Native
Americans by the settlers and government of the United states. Had
Israel stopped there, in 1948, I could probably live with it. As an
Israeli, I grew up believing that this primal sin our state was
founded on may be forgiven one day, because the founder's generation
was driven by the faith that this was the only way to save the Jewish
people from the danger of another holocaust.” -- Tanya
Reinhart, Israel/Palestine – How to End the War of 1948,
source

An
honest comparison which evidently learned rebels like Alan Hart,
another favorite rebel of the dissent space, who keep comparing the
Zionist enterprise in Palestine to the Nazis, fail to make. I
examined this inexplicable failure in response to Alan Hart's
characterization of Israel as “The New Nazis”, in No,
No - Not the 'New Nazis',
January 2009.

Therefore,
concluding the preceding analysis, I have to wonder how comes the
brilliant white man is suddenly so naive that he fails to see the
parallel white man's burdens in all his holier than thou
blanket Jew bashing? I hope I may be forgiven today, in 2011,
that I am entirely unable to differentiate one white man's burden
from another. Can you tell them apart in the images below? Please
click on the image and it will take you to a more detailed exposition
in case you feel you are able tell the difference:

Caption
Hidden no longer: Genocide in the Americas by the pious Christians
bearing the gift of the white man's burden to the native
Indian tribes hiddennolonger.com

Caption
Genesis to Genocide in Palestine by the pious Jews bearing the gift
of the white man's burden to the Arabs and Muslims

Caption
Exodus, destruction, death and chaos, inflicted by the pious bearing
gifts of Western civilization's new white man's burden, the
war on terror, to Pakistan with copious help from the Pakistani House
Negroes

Caption
Exodus, destruction, death and chaos, inflicted by the pious bearing
gifts of Western civilization's new white man's burden, the
war on terror, to Afghanistan

Caption
Exodus, destruction, death and chaos, inflicted by the pious bearing
gifts of Western civilization's new white man's burden, the
war on terror, to Iraq

Caption
Jesus has come in May to Afghanistan: US troops urged to share faith
in Afghanistan - 04
May 09

Caption
US Soldiers in Afghanistan Told to “hunt people for Jesus...
so we get them into the kingdom” rebelreports

And,
I would be sorely remiss in not condemning the brazen and pernicious
role of House Negroes
in dutifully carrying the white man's burden
as their own. Pakistani negroes
and native informants
are famous for their being trivially flattered into the massa's
lair. Quoting from the former Director of ISI's memoirs, Profiles
of Intelligence: 'A
lot has been said and written by some of our American friends about
the price of a Pakistani. Dr. Andrew V. Corry, US Counsel General at
Lahore, once said, “Price of a Pakistani oscillates between
a free trip to the US and a bottle of whisky.” He may not
be too far wrong. We did observe some highly placed Pakistanis
selling their conscience, prestige, dignity and self-respect for a
small price.' (Brig. Tirmazi,
Director of Pakistan's ISI at the time of the judicial homicide of
its elected primeminister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, Profiles of
Intelligence, 1995, pg.
45).

Can
you easily tell the difference between the burden of the white man
and his house niggers:

Caption
Shameless Stooges at the massa's table in payoff for
“Bukakke”
services rendered. Tahir ul-Qadri and Imran Khan are not simpleton
patsies – they know exactly what they are doing by echoing
empire's axioms on Terrorism. Just being invited to sit at the white
man's table and utter gibberish in gratitude is evidently
sufficient incentive for Pakistani brown-sahibs to commit
treason. The Western establishment's cultivated Trojan Horses
among Muslims to institute beneficial religious-political
diversity (sic!), namely “moderate
Islam”,
Qadri–Khan
make even Mir
Jafar/Mir Sadiq
duo look virtuous. The final payment awaiting stooges when their
services are terminated can be witnessed in the fate of the one far
more illustrious, Benazir
Bhutto.
The ill-fated daughter of the East had echoed the same axioms
on Terrorism at the CFR
in 2007. Evidently, anyone and everyone can be recruited after they
have shown their willingness to echo the
white man's burden.
Here is CFR's
latest 2011 promotion
from among the native informants. Now is your chance to serve
the massa – pathetic house
negroes
are evidently still in great demand! And you can have your choice of
“Betweens”
to choose from as your daily service. Trips to Disneyland,
sabbaticals, appointments, and book deals are included in the
compensation package based on the level of eruditeness of your
bullshit. (Image contributed by a Pakistani field negro)

The
foolish 'untermenschen' better understand the insidious breadth and
depth of the common la mission civilisatrice bond among the
white man (and including their house
niggers who are
often more white than the white man) when they
come, individually, and in groups, wearing different colored labels
of Left, Right, Liberal, Conservative, Progressive, Atheist,
Christian, Jew, whatever, bearing gifts of pious virtue in various
Hegelian Dialects. Zbigniew Brzezinski justified the primacy of the
powerful with “Hegemony is as old as mankind” in
The Grand Chessboard only as the latter day secular version of
that same white man's burden.

When
I recently, only this past week in fact, once again challenged the
pious white man's characteristic narratives in their blanket
Jew bashing screeds in my letter: Zahir
Ebrahim's Letter to John Kaminski – Are you Jewish?,
and deconstructed the new white man's burden of Secular
Humanism they now wish to inflict upon humanity in the guise of
discrediting all established religions in order to secure their
one-world government, I was not surprised by what happened. You can
read
the response of the fanatic all-knowing Jew-basher, who has extended
his unfettered Jew bashing to both Christian and Muslim bashing:
“Christians and Muslims are trapped in the same
delusional mindlock as the Jews,” reviling without any
compunction more than 5 billion peoples on the planet in just one
sentence, even calling my religion, Islam, “fetid and
toxic dogma”.

The
supposedly rebel website which goes by that very name and presents
itself on the side of the 'untermensch' by publishing dissenting
articles with empire, gratuitously wrote an amusing editorial
response to my letter instead of condemning their own favorite white
man whose trite screed they boldly feature on their front page every
week as the avantgarde in progressive thought: Rebel
News' Letter to Zahir Ebrahim – Are you Mossad?.
When I submitted my response
to the white man denigrating my religion and 5 billion peoples' on
the planet in the name of dissent and requested the website publish
my response, the same editor wrote back: “I won't. Your
writings clearly don't fit in. Thank you for your time. -- Andrew
Winkler Rebel Media Group”!