Nice find on the Raven's comment. I wish we had a list of boards that we could intercommunicate with during that teams week.

For instance, this week, we infiltrate Raven's board respectfully engaging in discussion about the upcoming game.

Yeah, that's going to turn out just alright. Lol.

But I have to agree, Flacco isn't as good as Rodgers. He was very mediocre last year, but his team won some games. The defense isn't playing as well as they used to, and now Flacco is struggling pretty bad.

I think that this kid can turn it around. If you looked at him play at the start of the season, he looked pretty impressive. He's no push over. If we underestimate him, we might be up for a long game.

Think of the Vikings games. Flacco's nowhere near Favre and Rice and McGahee aren't as good Peterson, but if we come out, only stopping the run again, we might be screwed.

Our requirements are simple. Each member of F2FA must:[ul]Be fan-based. Commericial sites are not allowed in F2FA. Each F2FA member site is created, and operated by, a fan of the team it represents.

Have an active message board. F2FA sites promote one another all week leading up to the game. This allows fans from one site to interact with fans from another which increases traffic for both.

Have a dedicated url. Dedicated urls (web addresses) make a site's location easier to find and remember.

Have a link to the F2FA.com site and a weekly link to any opponent member's site. This allows us to promote each other and F2FA as a whole. You can see how this is done by visiting any member site.[/ul]

What's the determination of a commercial site? One that carries a financial profit?

I think the f2f matters to the sites that have it, because it definitely "builds and keeps" their site in the national eye amongst the other fanbases.

It doesn't really matter (much, imo) to us in the sense that both PC and PPO -- as an excellent example--- are the two "big" sites for their respective fan bases, forums-wise, yet...

(PPO is the purple f2f site)

PPO seems to have a lot more "interconnectivity" with US, instead of PC.

Really, all that would need to happen is for members HERE to link with the f2f sites of the other teams. The reason being is that we would build a relationship with each of those sites, regardless if we are a "formal" member of the f2f alliance. That alliance is obviously important to the site owners, but the fans themselves...not so much, except to FIND the other fan's sites.

That link I provided does precisely that. We know where to go already.

:thumbleft:

I think PC was one of the absolute original members there. If my theory is true (I seem to recall making an attempt to have us recognized) ---

You were climbing rapidly in membership rolls, were getting in the neighborhood of PC in a pure numbers sense, strengthening a case if an attempt was going to be made in order to "wrest control" of that designation from PC, if you so desired.

I like what they've done with PChatters (I mean no disrespect to them, but I hate sites that use fan's to profit via ad links and public requests for donations.), but I just think we offer a better platform all around than most Packers sites for something of this degree.

Consider a fire lit under my ass. I'm not sure what I'm going to do, but I like the idea and since there's no way we're going to knock PC out of the Packers slot, something comparative will have to be done. This is being added to my project lists.

You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.