Assembly of First Nations wrong to oppose education reform

The recent decision by the Assembly of First Nations to reject Ottawa’s musings about reforming on-reserve education was an example of a react first, ask questions later approach. It was unhelpful, most of all to First Nations kids.

For one thing, the government’s upcoming First Nation Education legislation hasn’t even been created; it won’t be introduced in Parliament until 2014. But that didn’t stop AFN leader Shawn Atleo from rejecting possible reforms two years in advance. Atleo and other native politicians should reconsider, especially given the dismal state of much on-reserve education.

Education statistics from the 2006 census make clear the need for reform (2011 results are not yet available): 50 per cent of “Registered Indians” do not have a high school diploma, in comparison to 23 per cent of other Canadians.

But opposition to reform is at least as entrenched as the need for it.

Part of the opposition is driven by a healthy suspicion of remedies imposed by Ottawa. Some native leaders dislike federal diktats just as premiers would if they were told how to run their education bureaucracies.

However, federal Aboriginal Affairs Minister John Duncan already made clear the legislation will only be drafted after “intensive consultation” with First Nations. So it’s a bit much to oppose possible reforms now.

In addition, until reserves are self-sustaining out of locally created revenues, other taxpayers who provide the $1.7 billion now spent annually for on-reserve education for 117,500 children (with another $275-million announced by Duncan) also deserve some say in how such monies will be spent in the future.

The deeper reason some native leaders may oppose any new thinking about education is the same reason some are opposed to reform of the reserve system itself: reforms may weaken the influence of leaders over those who live on reserves. But such reform is needed, including options for off-reserve education.

The relative success of off-reserve First Nations kids versus those on reserve is revealing. A 2009 report from Statistics Canada found seven out of 10 off-reserve First Nations children (78,325 of them) were reported by their parents to be doing “very well” or “well” in school. Also, the parents of more than 90 per cent of such children “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that their child’s school gave enough information about academic progress, attendance and behaviour.

The statistical agency reported those findings are similar to those reported (by their parents) for non-native children. That noted, parental satisfaction is not the same as achievement equal to non-native children. First Nations young people in provincial schools do not complete high school at the same rate as their off-reserve classmates.

For example, 50 per cent of First Nations people aged 25 to 64 living on reserve had not completed high school. That compares to 30 per cent of First Nations people who live off reserve. Also, only 14 per cent of those on reserve had a college diploma, whereas the figure for First Nations people off-reserve was 20 per cent. For those on-reserve, just four per cent had a university degree compared to nine per cent for those First Nations people off-reserve.

Whenever the possibility of mixing more First Nations kids with non-native kids is brought up, some immediately have concerns over possible forced assimilation given past attempts to such an end.

To have children rub shoulders with kids of different backgrounds is something most people value. It is how kids learn to appreciate and value diversity; it is how they become more tolerant.

First Nations children are doing better in off-reserve schools and their parents are mostly happy with how such schools perform. Given that reality, such types of education (along with many other choices) should also be part of the menu of educational options available to improve future outcomes for Canada’s First Nation children.

Mark Milke is a senior fellow at the Fraser Institute.

Comments

We encourage all readers to share their views on our articles and blog posts. We are committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion, so we ask you to avoid personal attacks, and please keep your comments relevant and respectful. If you encounter a comment that is abusive, click the "X" in the upper right corner of the comment box to report spam or abuse. We are using Facebook commenting. Visit our FAQ page for more information.

Almost Done!

Postmedia wants to improve your reading experience as well as share the best deals and promotions from our advertisers with you. The information below will be used to optimize the content and make ads across the network more relevant to you. You can always change the information you share with us by editing your profile.

By clicking "Create Account", I hearby grant permission to Postmedia to use my account information to create my account.

I also accept and agree to be bound by Postmedia's Terms and Conditions with respect to my use of the Site and I have read and understand Postmedia's Privacy Statement. I consent to the collection, use, maintenance, and disclosure of my information in accordance with the Postmedia's Privacy Policy.

Postmedia wants to improve your reading experience as well as share the best deals and promotions from our advertisers with you. The information below will be used to optimize the content and make ads across the network more relevant to you. You can always change the information you share with us by editing your profile.

By clicking "Create Account", I hearby grant permission to Postmedia to use my account information to create my account.

I also accept and agree to be bound by Postmedia's Terms and Conditions with respect to my use of the Site and I have read and understand Postmedia's Privacy Statement. I consent to the collection, use, maintenance, and disclosure of my information in accordance with the Postmedia's Privacy Policy.