Neither the vastness of the universe nor the enormousness of the
cosmic body shall ever become known to man by exploration. The minuteness of matter
shall likewise never be observed or measured by man. The profundity of the human
body is such that it exceeds human knowledge, which can merely scratch the surface.
Life is so complex and diverse that it shall forever be an enigma to man.

September 24, 1995

A wicked person is born of jealousy. Out of selfishness and anger he
complains about supposed “unfairness.”

A good person always has compassion in his heart. Free of
discontentment and hatred, he sees hardship as joy.

An enlightened person has not any attachment. He quietly observes the
people of the world lost in illusion.

September 25, 1995

He who disregards
ordinary sorrows and joys,
A cultivator is he.
He who has not attachment
to worldly loss and gain,
An Arhat is he.

Some people do not succeed at cultivation
during their lifetimes, nor do they make a vow to continue cultivating in their next
lives, and so they are apt to reincarnate as ordinary people and have no further
chance to cultivate. In that case what they cultivated in their previous lives is
converted into good fortune. Many officials of high rank are the reincarnations of
monks, for instance. They endured great hardships while cultivating and accumulated
some blessings, and thus they became, though their cultivation was not a success
ultimately, high-ranking officials or emperors.

If they made a vow that they would
cultivate again in their next life, were they not to succeed at cultivation in this
life, that act would help to form a karmic affinity in their next life. They would
possibly continue their cultivation in the same discipline in the next life, and it
might well lead to a karmic affinity for cultivation. If a person makes such a vow,
he will not be under the care of the earthly deities of low levels after he
reincarnates. His master will take care of him, following and watching him as he
reincarnates, ensuring that he is born into a family that will facilitate his
cultivation. And thus he will again have a chance to cultivate.

A good portion of the monks in some
monasteries won’t manage to succeed at cultivation. The primary reasons they won’t
succeed are that many attachments are not cast off, they don’t know how to
cultivate, and they have not gained the Fa. Some people think that they can
successfully cultivate Buddhahood by chanting sutras, but they won’t succeed
if they fail to shed human attachments. Their minds are focused on Buddha, after
all, though, so after passing away they wander about in the temple, and follow along
as others cultivate. That’s how it is for them. You can’t quite call him a ghost,
but nor can you call him a monk, since he is not a human being. Mankind’s
predicament is quite a mess at present. Another thing is, some Buddha statues have
no Buddha on them, and some false Buddhas are the forced result of the worship some
people have done. Nowadays some people will tie a red strip of cloth to a tree and
go worship it, and they worship mountains, or a rock. They will worship a Buddha
statue after it is made, despite its not having been through image consecration.
Such worship has brought false Buddhas into being. [These false Buddhas] look
exactly the same as real Buddhas, but they are fake, and will do bad things in the
guise of Buddhas. This happens quite often.

Heaven sets forth strict conditions for the
achievement of one’s ultimate rank (zheng-guo), contrary to what people
imagine. In reality, Buddhism ceased to be effective with the arrival of modern
times. Many people no longer know how to cultivate, and cultivation is now hard to
do. A plethora of interpretations of the Buddhist sutras are now found in
Buddhism. One monk will give one explanation, while the next will turn around and
offer another. But explanations of that sort can lead people astray, and they all
serve to undermine Buddha Fa. People can arrive at new insights only from the
original words and meanings present in the Buddhist sutras, and only that way
can they arrive at even a small measure of insight. But even if it’s just a tiny bit
of truth they have grasped, with that, they have improved. And upon reading again,
they will become clear about another truth, and again will have improved. At
different levels they will arrive at different understandings. Some monks have tried
to set forth the meaning of Buddhist sutras, and some have even written books
that try to explain Buddha Fa, setting forth rigid interpretations, claiming that
this sentence means such and such, that one means this or that, and the next one…
But the sentences originally uttered by a Buddha have different connotations at
different levels, stretching all the way to the realm of Tathagata. The monk who
does that, meanwhile, is at a low level of cultivation and has not come to
understand the truths of a Bodhisattva or Buddha. Yet he tries to spell out what the
Buddhist sutras mean, when in fact that is no more than his own understanding
in his own realm. His words do not contain higher meanings, and will only lead
others to a low level of understanding, trapping them there. He has actually steered
people down a crooked path. When he says, “What the Buddha meant was that...” people
will be limited by it. People will interpret things in that manner, and none will be
able to cultivate to higher levels.

Interpretations of this sort have
proliferated over the generations. When people talk about the Tripitaka [the “Three
Baskets”]—sutras, rules, and treatises—the sutras are to be considered
differently; neither the monastic rules nor the philosophical treatises can be
thought of as on the same plane as the sutras. The treatises in particular
are full of haphazard comments on Buddha Fa, and diminish the meanings that the
Buddha Fa originally had. Today’s monks use lay terminology to explain the Buddhist
sutras, but they have failed completely. The original meaning of what Buddha
Shakyamuni taught was just as it appeared, and any interpretation would be a
deviation. This is one reason why it is hard for today’s monks to succeed at
cultivation. Monks don’t know this, however, and when they cannot understand the
originals of the Buddhist sutras—which happens, since they were composed with
early classical grammar—they seek out reference works. But those reference works are
full of irresponsible interpretations that the authors made based on their own
minute understandings. This has been a problem throughout history. This was the case
in ancient times as well, so don’t blindly believe books written long ago. They are
no exception, and have in fact served to undermine the Buddha Fa. Buddha Shakyamuni
said that his Dharma would be no good after a certain number of years, and that when
the Age of Law’s End arrived demons would come to damage the Dharma. This is one of
the reasons.

Buddhism is no longer found in India, and
this owes to the irresponsible acts of monks there. One would take [the sutra]
to mean one thing and the next person something else, making for a tangled mess of
different views. Whatever the interpretation arrived at, it was not the meaning
Buddha Shakyamuni had intended; the original meaning had been lost. That is why
Buddhism no longer exists in India.

It’s fine to discuss together with others
the insights you have arrived at, as in that case it is you talking about your own
experiences and insights into a Buddha’s sutras. There is nothing wrong with
that and it won’t have any negative consequences. What is worst is using one’s own
words to set forth the meaning of passages from a Buddha’s sutras. Each
original sentence is not limited to merely the understanding that presents itself at
a particular level. You may find a principle articulated in there to be so right and
so good, but when you elevate and improve further, you will find that that same
sentence contains yet a higher truth.

Buddha Shakyamuni spent forty-nine years
imparting his Dharma. At the beginning he was not at the Tathagata level, and some
of the Fa he taught had been taught many years before. But he taught
continually, and what he taught in his later years, prior to his nirvana, was
vastly different from what he taught earlier. That is because he himself went
through a process of constantly arriving at new insights and improving, and he
himself was continually doing cultivation. But the fact is, he did not leave behind
for mankind the canon of the universe; it is people of today who call it Fa
or sutra. When Buddha Shakyamuni was alive there were no sutras. The
content was the product of people later recollecting Buddha Shakyamuni’s words, and
there were errors in the compilation process. The true meaning of some of what
Buddha Shakyamuni said was altered, but man at that time was allowed to know only so
much anyway. None of this was accidental; rather, it was fated to be so. This was
because in the past no one dared write down cultivation things in crystal-clear
terms and leave them to human beings. People had to figure out everything for
themselves. Human beings are in delusion and don’t know anything. It’s just very
hard for them to gain insight into things.

What Buddha Shakyamuni left to man during
his lifetime was primarily the monastic precepts. When Buddha Shakyamuni eventually
approached nirvana, one of his disciples asked him, “Now that our master is
leaving, whom shall we look to as our master?” Buddha Shakyamuni’s reply was, “Take
the precepts as your master.” And in fact, the precepts he left behind could guide
cultivators to Consummation (yuan-man). The precepts were ordained while he
was still alive, whereas later generations enshrined as sutra things that
they wrote down at a later time by drawing on what he had said in the past. I am the
first to have truly bestowed cultivation things to human beings; this has never been
done before. I have done something no predecessor ever did, and given people a
ladder to Heaven.

Religions exist for two purposes, in fact.
First, they truly make it possible for those who are good and can cultivate to
attain the Way; second, they can ensure that human society’s morality remains at a
relatively high level. Those are the two things religions are to do. What I am
imparting is not meant to be a religion, however. But nevertheless, truly imparting
the Fa and saving people will have the same effect: That is, to truly have
people find the Way and cultivate, to offer you a path; and to allow the many people
who have heard the Fa and read the book to understand some principles, even
though they might not want to cultivate, and thus they will not deliberately do bad
or harmful things thereafter. So the outcome is the same, with human morality being
kept at a relatively high level. That purpose is served as well. Truly imparting a
practice and teaching people—doesn’t that amount to saving people?

In pre-historic periods, some human
civilizations lasted longer and some shorter, with some being of considerable
length. In each period, the path to developing science that mankind took was
different. People today operate within the framework of modern scientific
development and cannot know that there are other avenues by which it could develop.
The fact is that the science of ancient China was completely different from that
which came from modern Europe. That of ancient China focused its studies directly on
human life and the universe. The ancients dared to explore things that were
intangible and invisible, and they were able to confirm their existence. The
sensations one has while sitting there doing meditation grow increasingly strong,
eventually to the point that the sensations not only become pronounced, but also
something palpable and visible. Something formless thus transcends itself to become
something with form. So the ancients took a distinct path, one exploring life’s
mysteries and the connections between the human body and the universe—a path
completely different from today’s empirical sciences.

The moon, in fact, was created by
prehistoric man, and its interior is hollow. Prehistoric man was quite advanced.
Today people hold that the pyramids were built by the Egyptians, and have tried to
determine where the stones were transported from. But it is nothing of the sort. The
pyramids in fact belong to a prehistoric culture, and were submerged at one point
beneath the sea. Because of subsequent changes on Earth—namely, multiple shifts in
the continental plates—the pyramids emerged anew. With time, the number of persons
in that area grew, with the new residents gradually coming to realize the functions
[of the pyramids]—that is, they could preserve things for great lengths of time.
They thus placed human corpses inside them. But these persons were not the ones who
built the pyramids; the Egyptians merely discovered them and made use of them. At a
later point the Egyptians erected smaller versions of the pyramids based on the
originals, and thus confused scientists.

Today man is merely able to view things in
light of current knowledge, with the most noticeable result being that the many
rules and axioms defined by the multitude of scientists practically stifle people.
Darwin said that man evolved from the ape, and people everywhere believe man did
evolve from the ape. Consequently, they have gone about deriving this and that from
the theory. Right now, science has discovered certain things that reach far beyond
the history of modern civilization, yet people dare not acknowledge such things and
instead regard them as impossible, and keep advancing things haphazardly and
speaking nonsense. One day there will emerge a science of the human body. The
physics, chemistry, and other scientific disciplines of the future might well be
developed on a different basis, one not necessarily altogether that of the West. The
axioms set forth by today’s empirical science are quite narrow, and acknowledge only
that which is visible and tangible; anything indiscernible to the eye or touch is
not acknowledged. Its scientific axioms are not scientific whatsoever, and have
completely boxed man in. When a person discovers via scientific means things
normally invisible and intangible, is that not science? Should it not be considered
science?

A true understanding of matter bears little
semblance to that of today’s scientists. When today’s scientists study things such
as neutrinos and atoms, they believe it’s not safe, as the particles will give off
radiation if not placed in a lead container. This is their perception, based on
existing theories that are within their own investigative reach. That’s just the
little bit that they can know, however. In reality, all objects are alive. Buddha
Shakyamuni said the same. Regardless of which dimension it is, the matter found
there exists materially while at the same time being alive. Neutrinos, atoms, gamma
rays, and matter at even more minute levels can all be controlled, but one has to
reach the requisite level to do so. The gong that we develop through
cultivation actually has powerful radiation that the cultivator is fully capable of
controlling. Today’s science is exploring how the universe was formed, offering up
every which theory and trying to pin down its composition. A higher understanding is
that the universe is comprised of time and space. And in fact, at the most
fundamental level the universe is comprised of energy. The tinier the substance, the
greater its radioactivity, and this is the essence of what happens at the most
fundamental level. Today’s scientists wouldn’t go so far as to acknowledge this, for
their knowledge is not at that point.

Matter on an extremely microcosmic plane—in
a state that is ultra-miniscule—constitutes an original matter that is in fact not
alive. It is a form of original matter that can’t be conceived of using a normal
human being’s way of thinking. This original matter is terrifying, for any object
that fell into it would be dissolved and disintegrated. The original matter,
strictly speaking, cannot be called matter. The universe has a special property,
called Zhen Shan Ren. Why is it that the minute particles of objects all
contain Zhen Shan Ren? As it turns out, Zhen Shan Ren is in fact able
to assemble and hold together the most original matter—that most original entity
that can’t quite be called matter—and thus assembles and holds together the most
original thing, forming the tiniest type of primitive matter. After forming that,
various kinds of extremely tiny particles of matter are assembled based on that, and
these tiny particles are in turn regrouped to form the soil, stone, metal, light,
and time found in different dimensions—the basic materials of the universe. These
further give rise to and produce larger forms of matter, resulting in myriad
objects. So, when all things and objects are created from this special property of
the universe, they naturally have in them the restraining quality of the Fa
of the universe. Thus, all matter has Buddha nature—that is, Zhen Shan Ren,
the element that constitutes the universe. And this is Buddha Fa, also known as the
Dao.

All things are alive and contain Buddha
nature; it is merely that they are susceptible to becoming fatigued. With the
exception of the special property, Zhen Shan Ren, any form of derivative
matter faces grave danger upon becoming fatigued—i.e., the weathering and
decomposing of a material thing. In other words, objects disintegrate. Broadly
speaking, when objects disintegrate, it means that the lower levels of the universe
deteriorate, that the Fa ceases to function. When the law in people’s hearts
stops functioning, human beings turn vile, being no longer bound by moral values.
When human morality is maintained at a normal state, the Fa can remain
constant and steady; this is feasible as long as the human heart doesn’t turn vile.
But failing that, a human being must go through transmigration, and so no matter
what he becomes in the cycle of rebirth—be it a plant, an animal, a material object,
cement, or sand—whatever it may be, he will still carry with him his karma. And so,
looking at it from this perspective, when mankind degenerates, it is not merely
human society that is degenerating, but rather, all things. In the Age of Law’s End,
Earth, certain dimensions of the universe, flowers, grass, and trees all have karma.

With the existence of transmigration, it is
possible that a human being will be born a human in one life and an animal in the
next. Transmigration is not in fact limited to reincarnating as one of six
categories of lives [as traditionally thought]. The six are merely what Buddha
Shakyamuni described. A life may reincarnate as a human being, a celestial being, or
an asura demon, just as it may reincarnate as something like a wild animal, a
domestic animal, or a material object.

If man’s science is to develop to a certain
level, first and foremost the standard for human morality has to rise, lest
something like a cosmic war break out. Human beings will never be able to reach the
realms of Buddhas through technology. Why is that? What Buddhas and celestial beings
have at their command are sciences and technologies higher than those of mankind.
Put another way, if human beings want to aspire to such heights, they cannot do so
merely through means of science and technology. If scientific and technological
means were in fact capable of such breakthroughs, natural disasters would truly
occur. That’s because if human beings were to reach a realm of such heights through
technology and gain divine powers of that magnitude, but their minds were still
filled with combativeness, greed, sexual desire, various wants, jealousy, and all
sorts of attachments, including to fame and gain—if they were to bring attachments
of every sort there—chaos would befall the heavens. So that scenario is absolutely
not allowed to take place.

The only way for human beings to reach such
heights is via cultivation. Only by ridding oneself of attachments and desires
through grueling cultivation and by assimilating to the special property of the
universe—Zhen Shan Ren—is it possible to reach a level that high. What is
science, anyway? What Buddhas and Gods are in command of is the highest science.
Their understanding of matter is supreme, and at microcosmic levels they can
perceive matter to a certain microcosmic degree, as well as larger forms of matter
that exist in the universe. At present, the way human beings conceptualize it,
there’s this material thing here, then there are molecules, and then further down
there are atoms, etc… And as for matter that’s higher, they believe that planets are
the largest. But planets are not the largest form of matter; there are others even
larger. Buddhas are capable of seeing significantly large forms of matter as well as
significantly minute ones at the microcosmic level. Even with such abilities,
however, Buddhas, including Tathagatas, still cannot see the origin of matter; even
Tathagatas cannot see how large the universe ultimately is.

The beings in the heavens say that it’s
very hard to cultivate, that cultivation is almost impossible. And why do they say
that? Because Buddhas do not have any hardship to endure. Buddhas in the heavens
have no hardship. All they have are pleasant things, joyful things, and they can
have whatever they wish—the ultimate life of leisure. Think about it, then: Having
vast divine powers and no hardship, how could they cultivate? It is really hard for
them to improve. It’s easier for human beings to cultivate, but if humans don’t
reach that higher realm, none can ascend there. It’s akin to a bottle that is full
of dirt not being able to rise to the water’s surface. It is definitely the case
that a person cannot ascend there without self-purification.

The great wisdom of a Buddha refers to the
great wisdom within his realm. A Buddha whose level is twice as high as a Tathagata
understands the truth of the universe at a much higher level. When he talks about
three thousand chiliocosms, he doesn’t mean that every single grain of sand has
them. The great awakened ones have found that some sand and rocks have them. But
some rocks don’t. Granite, for one, does not. With some rocks, when you pick one of
them up you see an extremely vast world, and [the beings present there] look like
human beings. They don’t sense vibration even if you throw [the rock], for that is
just how they exist; if you set it down somewhere or even if it is submerged in
water, no water can enter its dimension.

It is a vast world. The way human beings
view the sizes of objects is actually wrong. There is no such thing as “size” in the
way that ordinary people conceptualize it. You see that that’s how an object is, but
that is only how it manifests to ordinary people. Be it a piece of paper, a
painting, or a very thin sheet of paper—any one of them can have Law Bodies (Fa-shen)
on it. Ordinary human beings find it inconceivable, but they are merely ordinary
people.

In fact, in our physical dimension on Earth
man is not the only type of humanoid. There are humanoids who reside in the seas. In
the past some people made this public, but ordinary society couldn’t accept it, and
branded it a myth. But actually, what was said was true. When the continental plates
begin to shift, many sea beds emerge. There are humanoids on the ocean floor,
several kinds. Some of them resemble us, and some are rather different. Some have
gills, while some are human from the waist up and fish from the waist down; others
have human legs with upper bodies that are fish.

Lessons from Buddhism

Today, some monks have written many books.
But what have they written? Black qi permeates each word and line. These
persons can’t see it themselves; the things inside are a chaotic mess. Phenomena
like this are rampant in the Age of Law’s End.

Buddha Shakyamuni’s Dharma came into being
in India, so how is it that it vanished there? While Buddha Shakyamuni was alive,
the things that he taught and what he required of people were adhered to. When
Buddha Shakyamuni taught his Dharma, if someone didn’t understand it, he could
inquire with him. And if he did something wrong, Buddha Shakyamuni could correct
him. After Buddha Shakyamuni’s departure from this world, many monks gave faulty
explanations based on their own interpretations of Buddha Shakyamuni’s words.
Supposing Buddha Shakyamuni cultivated to a level the height of a house and the
average monk managed to cultivate only one foot high, could that monk understand all
of the true underlying meaning of the Dharma at different levels all the way to the
celestial rank (guo-wei) of Tathagata? Buddha Shakyamuni’s words, at each
level, contain the cultivation method at that level. That is why a cultivator can
cultivate upward on the basis of the understandings he reaches at various levels.
When he cultivates to a new level there will always be Fa there to guide him.
And for that reason he arrives at a new understanding of the same sentence of
Fa whenever he reaches a new level. With the original text of the Buddhist
sutras, you would gain a new understanding with each reading. When you
improved further and read the sutra again, you would gain new understandings
again. Just like this, as you kept learning and changing and improving your
understanding, your cultivation level would elevate.

As soon as some monks discussed Buddhist
sutras through the lens of their own interpretations, and did so using
ordinary people’s terms, or wrote books of that sort, they immediately dragged
people into their own confines. They would put forth interpretations of a Buddhist
sutra. Buddha Shakyamuni’s words were of a very high level and contained so
much deeper meaning. Yet those monks had enlightened to none of it. That was because
their cultivation levels were low! So their words, when taken to heart by Buddhists,
lead and confine people to the monk’s own cognitive framework. It seems like a good
thing they were doing, as it appears they were encouraging people in the study of
Buddhism. But weren’t they in reality undermining Buddha Fa? Undermining Buddha Fa
can assume different forms. Some saboteurs praise it and disrupt it at the same
time. Such damage is the hardest to detect and see through, and the most damaging.
Buddha Shakyamuni’s Dharma is no longer passed down in India precisely because of
this.

Many people are trying to explain what
Buddha Shakyamuni taught, saying that what he meant was such and such. But that is
merely what those persons have come to understand at their own levels. Some people’s
celestial eyes (tian-mu) are open, and they have seen some truths at various
levels. But [what they have seen] is not as high and profound as what Buddha
Shakyamuni saw at the level of Tathagata, and the dimensions they have broken
through to are not as vast. And people whose celestial eyes are open at very low
levels can see only but a few dimensions, and those they do see are at very low
levels. There are different truths in different dimensions, so when they say that
something is such-and-such way, that’s not really the case. Those who irresponsibly
interpret the Fa are leading people into the confines of their own
understandings. So tell me: Are they protecting the Buddha Fa or disrupting it? That
is why no one is allowed to change a single word of the sutras! Just
enlighten from and cultivate by the sutras’ original teaching! No one is
allowed to arbitrarily interpret even a single word of the Buddha’s sutras.
It is all right to talk about one’s own individual understandings, however. People
may share thoughts with one another, saying: “I have come to realize something… now
I have come to see the following meaning...” “I feel that it indicates that I didn’t
handle something well, so I should improve in certain ways…” or “This sentence is
referring to me, hinting that I didn’t do well. This is great.” When that person
improves and reads it again, he will find that the same sentence provides new
insight. That is how a person improves, and it is in that manner that people
enlighten to and understand things.

Nowadays there are monks and lay Buddhists
who have written a lot of things and who regard what they have written as
sutra. But only the Fa taught by a Buddha is sutra! How could
those things that they write qualify as sutra?! And yet they call them sutras.
Worse yet, many lay Buddhists and monks are pursuing fame and material gain, and
they love ostentation. They are delighted with themselves when others praise them. A
cultivator should really carry out his cultivation. Real cultivation is about
getting rid of human attachments. Things such as the pursuit of fame and gain among
ordinary people, being combative or a show off, having a jealous heart—all human
desires and attachments need to be eliminated. So when it comes to those who have a
strong desire to get ahead of everyone and showcase themselves in the secular world,
one can imagine how many attachments they will exhibit. True cultivators find such
people really hard to look at. There are also those who cultivate Buddhahood and yet
have an intense desire for money and wealth. They don’t say it out loud, but the
instant their heart or mind stirs, people at high cultivation levels or Buddhas know
it.

Here the focus is on those who do
cultivation full-time [as monastics or clergy], but the same in fact applies to many
who are studying Buddhism. Are these people really learning Buddhism? What do
cultivators cultivate, after all? Cultivation is about none other than removing
attachments. Very, very little value should be placed on ordinary human desires. Why
is it that many people who have obtained the Dao have headed deep into the
mountains and are unwilling to stay in monasteries in the Age of Law’s End? The
reason they entered the mountains and forests is that they found that many persons
residing in monasteries were not doing true cultivation. Many of the monks there had
attachments they didn’t want to give up, they schemed against one another, and those
were no longer places of purity or true cultivation. Hence, those cultivators
avoided it by going far away.

Then of course, there is overt harm done by
cults and demonic practices. These are easy to identify, and with one glance one can
tell that they are evil. Harm done in the name of Buddhism, however, is the most
severe. Why did Buddha Shakyamuni say that his Dharma would no longer be able to
save people in the Age of Law’s End? Today is the Age of Law’s End. Monks can hardly
save themselves, let alone others! I have described the things that happen in the
Age of Law’s End, and some people have suddenly realized the truth. The developments
in today’s society are terrifying. Just take a look and you will see that all sorts
of false, wicked, evil, and chaotic things have emerged!

So here we have laid out these truths, but
no specific persons have been named. Many monks have written books, and on the
surface it seems meant to promote Buddha Fa. But in their very bones it is about
fame and personal gain. People ask me, “What about so-and-so?” To which I’ve
replied, “Despite his great fame, he wantonly interpreted the Buddhist sutras
and marketed himself. He has long since been condemned to Hell, in fact.”

Sutras, rules, and treatises—with
the exception of the sutras, these serve to undermine the original meaning of
Buddha Fa. Nowadays there are people who talk about the “Three Baskets.” But in
reality there are not three baskets: There are only the sutras, and a sutra
is a sutra. The others can’t be placed on equal ground with the sutras.

The Decline of the Human Race and Emergence of Enlightened Beings

The decline of man didn’t begin with the
time of Eve, as indicated by Jesus. This Earth has gone through more than one
civilization and primitive period; there were prehistoric civilizations that were
destroyed. In some cases Earth was utterly destroyed or replaced, with a completely
new one being created. Hasn’t mankind talked about catastrophes that end the world?
It has been religions that have talked about this, in fact. After a certain time
passes a large catastrophe occurs, and after some time a small catastrophe takes
place. In a small catastrophe people are wiped out on a local scale; when a certain
area has turned very bad it is destroyed. There are earthquakes, the submerging of
continental plates, the spreading of sandstorms, or famines and wars. A small
catastrophe is localized, while a large catastrophe affects most all of mankind. A
large catastrophe occurs only after the passage of many years. The shifts that take
place on Earth, like the movement of objects, follow certain patterns. The large
catastrophe that unfolds with its shifts is what leads to mankind’s annihilation.
There are a small number of people who survive, however, and inherit some of the
culture that predates history, and they live a life similar to that in the Stone
Age. Since all tools of production will have been destroyed, the ensuing generation
has an even worse predicament, for much will have been forgotten. So the population
begins to increase from a primitive state, and over time there emerges again
civilization and advanced technology. When the human race again deteriorates,
catastrophes again unfold. There is thus cyclical change wherein there are periods
of formation, stasis, and degeneration.

In other words, the degeneration of man is
an inevitability. But in each age when civilization comes about, invariably there
are divinities who send great enlightened beings to the human world to save people.
The purpose is to prevent the disproportionate degeneration of the human mind in
relation to substances and material on Earth. All matter that makes up the Earth of
this universe has a special property. Only with this special property is it possible
to form primitive, formless things into matter that has form and life. But it is
forbidden for the human mind to degenerate before matter does. That is why each time
a civilization or culture comes about among human beings, there appear great
enlightened beings. Great enlightened beings have emerged in all periods of
prehistory. In the current civilization, beings such as Jesus, Shakyamuni, and Lao
Zi came to tell things to people. In the civilized areas of different periods, there
were different enlightened beings who were responsible for teaching people how to
return to one’s original, true self. They enabled those who could obtain the
Dao to achieve Consummation; showed ordinary people how to cherish virtue;
and required that mankind maintain its morality at a relatively level state, thus
ensuring that the human mind would not degenerate so easily. When finally one day
all matter in the universe was to degenerate, they would then be hands-off. But that
is an extremely long process.

During those times, what the enlightened
beings try to do is prevent man’s degeneration and, in doing so, enable those who
may progress in cultivation to truly attain the Dao through cultivation. Man
did not, as Darwin claimed, evolve from the ape. That is a case of man degrading
himself. Human beings all fell here from the many dimensions of the universe. They
no longer met the requirements of the Fa at their given levels in the
universe, and thus had to drop down. Just as we have said before, the heavier one’s
mortal attachments, the further down one drops, with the descent continuing until
one arrives at the state of ordinary human beings. In the eyes of higher beings, the
point of a human being’s life is not for you to merely be human, but rather, to have
you awaken quickly on Earth, this setting of delusion, and return. That is what they
really have in mind; they are opening a door for you. Those who fail to return will
have no choice but to reincarnate, with this continuing until they amass a huge
amount of karma and are destroyed. That is why Earth has witnessed many
catastrophes.

From another perspective, however, Earth is
but the garbage dump of the universe. There are countless galaxies and planets
within countless vast universes, and on each planet there are beings. Human beings
deny the existence of other dimensions, so they are unable to see those beings. They
exist in other dimensions of the same planets [as the ones that we see], not our
dimension, and thus ordinary people cannot see them. It’s similar to how human
beings say that the Mars of this dimension is hot, but if one were to break through
this dimension, it would prove to be somewhat cold over on the other side. Many
people with supernatural abilities gaze at the Sun, and after doing so for a while
find it no longer to be hot. And after gazing again, they find that it is dark.
Looking yet again, it is seen to be a cold and refreshing world. In this material
dimension it manifests in one way, while in another material dimension it manifests
otherwise. So, there are living beings found everywhere, and that includes human
beings. And when they are not in line with the standard of a given level, bit by bit
they drop. It’s analogous to a school student failing to advance to a higher grade,
only in this case they ultimately fell to the point of being among ordinary human
beings. The human beings in the universe who are bad fall downwards, falling to the
very center of the universe—Earth.

A person who dwells in the human world goes
through reincarnation, and there is no guarantee he will be reborn as a human being.
He might reincarnate into any of a number of different material things, different
plants, different animals, or even microorganisms. And throughout the course of his
reincarnations, the wrong that he does is always carried with him, and that is
karma. What a being can carry along are namely virtue and karma, and they are always
with him. If someone whose karma is large reincarnates as a tree, that tree will
have karma. And if he reincarnates as an animal, that animal will have karma. The
bricks, soil, rocks, animals, and plants on Earth can all have karma. Why is it that
the medicine taken by or injected into patients in the Age of Law’s End is not as
effective as in the past? It’s because today’s human beings, having generated an
enormous amount of karma, carry strong karma on them, and thus the medicine’s
original efficacy is gone and it’s not in the least capable of treating that
condition. Yet if a larger dose of medicine were administered, the patient would be
poisoned. Today many diseases are incurable. Such is the state of the entire planet;
everything has in fact degenerated to a grave extent. Jesus was able to bear man’s
sins, and Buddha Shakyamuni spent forty-nine years saving people, laboring
tremendously. Didn’t they set out to broadly save sentient beings? Then why didn’t
they just send everyone right up to heaven? Because people did not meet the
standards of higher planes; for this reason they couldn’t go there. Each level has
its standard. If you are not qualified to be a college student, can you go to
college? The reason you can’t go [to heaven] is that there are far too many things
you can’t let go of, and your body is too encumbered. Wherever your moral standard
is, that’s where you are. The only way [to ascend] is analogous to attending school:
If you can make it to the next grade or year, then you will go there. The rest will
turn ever more degenerate and be destroyed. When garbage turns foul it shouldn’t be
allowed to contaminate the universe. It thus has to be destroyed.

Broadly saving sentient beings is what
Buddhas preach and make a practice of. Or, more specifically, it is at the Tathagata
level that saving sentient beings is of concern. Buddhas whose level is twice as
high as Tathagata do not look after the affairs of ordinary human beings. Were they
to do so, the utterance of just one sentence of theirs would cause changes among
ordinary humans. So they cannot look after them, as their power is too great. For a
greater Buddha, Earth isn’t large enough for so much as his toe; and for a still
greater Buddha, Earth is too small even for his hair follicle. The words a Buddha
utters are Fa and, when spoken, cause immediate changes. For this reason they
never get involved in affairs on Earth. The only ones who make a practice of broadly
saving sentient beings are Tathagatas and Bodhisattvas.

Tathagata Buddhas refer to human beings as
ordinary beings, but even higher divine beings at very high levels look upon
Tathagatas, upon reaching that plane and looking back, as ordinary beings. In the
eyes of a divine being at that high of a level, human beings don’t amount even to
microorganisms. Upon taking a look, [they would say,] “Such a rotten place, demolish
it! Destroy it!” Earth is such a place. Those who show pity toward human beings are
the Buddhas in closest proximity to human beings. Jesus was at the level of
Tathagata, and so was Lao Zi. Those at higher levels don’t care about human affairs.
If human beings call out to them, they cannot hear it. A human being’s so much as
calling out their names amounts to insulting them. It’s like a sound coming from a
lump of feces, calling out your name.

Scholarship and Cultivation Are Two Different Things

Jesus, like others, was at the Tathagata
level. In the past, Tathagata was the lowest status among Buddhas. It used to be
that those below Tathagata status were not referred to as Buddhas; they were called
“Bodhisattva” or “Arhat.” Each Tathagata has his own heavenly kingdom
(tian-guo). There are over one hundred Tathagatas in our Milky Way. That
means that there are over one hundred worlds of Buddhas’ heavenly kingdoms. Each
such world is ruled by a Tathagata. The Tathagata in each heavenly kingdom world has
his own set of cultivation methods, his own set of methods for saving people. The
formation of one’s world is directly related to one’s own cultivation. The creation
of one’s world is the product of cultivation. But these worlds are not something
that modern man can create through cultivation. They came into being countless eons
ago.

There is an issue here. As ordinary people,
we might think that as we cultivate it’s good to enrich our minds by learning more
cultivation methods and coming to know more of what’s taught in different religions.
And people regard such things as their ordinary people’s wisdom and knowledge.
Actually, they are not knowledge in the ordinary sense, and you can’t view these
things with ordinary concepts. Why is it that a human being has to focus on
cultivating his xinxing in cultivation, and why do the Daoist practices
emphasize virtue? Because this universe has a Fa, a special property. This
special property of the universe has different requirements for different beings at
different levels. Human beings are at this level of ordinary beings, so they need to
meet the moral standard set for ordinary human beings. Why is it that they can’t
make progress [in cultivation] unless they take virtue to be important? It’s because
the levels beyond ordinary human beings have standards for heavenly beings, and if
you don’t measure up to them, you won’t be able to go there. Why can divine beings
in the heavens fall? Why can an Arhat fall when he fails to cultivate well? The
reason is that they no longer meet the standards at their respective levels.

So, there are over one hundred heavenly
kingdoms in this Milky Way, and each heavenly kingdom has one Tathagata presiding
over it. The qualities and composition of his heavenly kingdom are formed by his
cultivation method. We have found that, be it in religious practices or other
cultivation ways, the motions at the surface are quite simple—a meditation with
conjoining of hands (jie-yin) will do. Even in the case of the Daoist school,
which requires more motions, there are only but a few and they are simple. Then how
is it such practices manage to reach the lofty realms of Buddhas, Bodhisattvas, and
Arhats? It’s because the true development and transformation of gong is
extremely complex. The person’s very cells have to be evolved and transformed, a
whole array of divine powers have to be developed, and there are a great many things
yet unknown to man—things that are appropriate only for certain levels—and these too
must be developed. To use an analogy, they are more intricate than even the most
complicated precision instruments known to the human world, and are simply beyond
man’s reach. There is thus a saying in the cultivation world, which goes,
“Cultivation is up to you, while gong is up to the master.” In other words, a
true cultivation method… Even though people of the Daoist school have discussed
cultivation methods, those represent merely principles at the surface level and an
aspiration. They are merely conceptual. If one truly aspires to cultivate real gong
that’s comprised of high-energy matter, he needs to have that aspiration of his own
accord, the desire to do it. But the real evolving that takes place in other
dimensions is extraordinarily complex, and beyond the means of human beings. It is
all done by the person’s master.

Then, there’s an issue here. If you mix
things from other practices into your cultivation, problems will come about. In the
past, monks were not allowed to have contact with other practices, and for
generations monasteries strictly prohibited monks from reading the texts of other
practices. Today’s monks are a mess. It used to be that monks couldn’t have any
worldly possessions, and they were utterly forbidden from reading the texts of other
practices. The reason is, it’s essential to make him stay with one single
cultivation method, holding fast to one cultivation discipline. Only when his mind
and thoughts are filled with the content of one practice will he be able to steadily
cultivate higher, making his way up a singular path. Otherwise, if you mix in things
from other practices it is akin to putting a camera part into a television set—it
will immediately break. I’m just illustrating a point. If a person mixes things into
his cultivation, his whole practice will be fouled up, and he will no longer make
progress. Furthermore, it’s hard to discern the true things from the false, and if
you mix in wicked, false things, you will likely end up having cultivated completely
in vain. Even your master would have no remedy, for it would be a problem of your
xinxing.

The [process of] developing and evolving
gong is extremely complicated, but people have treated it as if it were some
ordinary human theory. “I’ll learn a little from Christianity, a little from
Buddhism, a little from Daoism, and a little from Confucianism.” They may refer to
it as “several teachings under the same roof,” but that’s in fact nonsense. This is
the biggest problem that has arisen in the Age of Law’s End. Every human being has
Buddha nature, has a wish to cultivate, and wants to be good. However, people have
treated these things as ordinary human theory. It might be the case with ordinary
human skills that the more you know, the better. But a person [who mixes in other
practices] is only compounding the mess at hand. He will have no way to cultivate,
and have not a trace of gong.

Buddha Nature

A notion, once formed, will control you for
the duration of your life, influencing your thinking and even the full gamut of
emotions, such as your happiness, anger, sorrow, and joy. It is formed postnatally.
If this thing persists for some time, it will become part of a person’s thinking,
melding into the brain of that person’s true self, at which point it will shape his
temperament.

The notions that are developed will
obstruct and control a person for the remainder of his life. A human notion is
usually selfish—or worse—and thus generates thought karma which, in turn, controls
the person. A human being is to be governed by his master soul (zhu yuan-shen).
When your master soul becomes lax and is replaced by notions, you have
unconditionally surrendered, and your life is now under their control.

The self that is you is the innate self,
and it does not change. But a human being tends to easily form notions when
perceiving things, and that notion is not you. If you can manage not to form any
notions, when you look at something you will have the perception of your own kind,
innate nature—the view of the true you—and look at the matter charitably. The more
the true you comes to the fore, the higher your plane of thought is and the closer
your thoughts are to being True, and thus the greater the extent to which your
thoughts embody the realm of your innate, kind nature. The extremely, extremely
microscopic particles that comprise the human body make up the nature of a human
being, something that never changes. When the boundaries that confine a person’s
thinking are removed, man’s kind disposition, temperament, character, and traits
become readily apparent, and that is the true you.

The master soul will not change on account
of the person having developed a notion. The master soul will not change its
intrinsic qualities on account of the notion that the person developed. It can
however be the case that, owing to various human notions and forms of karma, a
person’s innate nature is buried, covered up, fully encased, and unable to shine
through. But it will not change. That is because karma does not have matter as fine
or as tiny as that in it. Karma is produced among ordinary human beings, so it is a
substance of ordinary man. It’s not possible for that material to be so microcosmic,
whereas when the life of a human being is created, extremely microcosmic substances
are used. That is why karma cannot penetrate it. It is merely that the person’s
original nature has been buried. One’s original nature has its own way of looking at
things. If you can truly remove the notions formed after birth and recover the
perception of your original nature, that will be where you came from, the earliest
notion that you formed—that is, the notion you had at the place where you were first
created. But it is very hard to vanquish thinking and notions acquired after birth,
for that is what cultivation is all about.

The Fa has different manifestations
at different levels. At a certain level, it has its manifestations at that level. If
you are a being born at that level, your thinking is going to mirror the notions of
the Fa at that level. When your true original nature returns, that will be
the level at which you will grasp things, and that standard is you, yourself.

Karma doesn’t have the standard Zhen
Shan Ren; it evaluates things according to the standard held at the time when
notions were formed. It may turn a person into what ordinary people call a “cunning
fellow” or “worldly” person. When this happens, it is a case of different forms of
thought-karma produced as a person cultivates acting up, and they will impede
cultivation. If people were not impeded by karma, cultivation would be easy. Karma
such as this was formed under specific circumstances and in the context of the moral
standards of the past few years, so it evaluates things in light of those standards.
If large amounts of this material are formed, the person will be under its sway for
the rest of his life. When the notion that was developed thinks that something is
good or bad, that person will think so as well and think that things should be done
accordingly. But his real self no longer exists. His real self is completely encased
and smothered by his unkind, acquired notions. He no longer has his own, true
standard for telling good from bad.

A notion is formed inside the brain’s
thoughts, and the thought karma generated by a notion is a cluster of karma that
takes shape atop a person’s head. What about a kind thought (shan nian),
then? Shakyamuni’s school has taught that the mere starting of a thought means
karma. And in fact, what is referred to as a “kind thought” is seen to be otherwise
if measured with a higher standard, or with the requirements of the higher standard
of Zhen Shan Ren.

This means that an ordinary person who
inhabits this world cannot find himself. And such a notion controls a person for not
just one lifetime, but continually onward. Only when a change takes place will it be
eliminated. Failing that, it will continue to exert control. When the notion gets
progressively stronger, the person’s real self will truly cease to exist. It is now
said that the karma is piled up layer after layer. And it has indeed reached that
point. Just look at ordinary people. They know not what they spend their days on,
nor for what they live!

People have different spiritual potentials
(gen-ji) and powers of insight (wu-xing). That’s the idea. Some
persons can come to realize these things, which means the person’s Buddha nature can
be recovered, and there is still hope for him. Some persons cannot realize them,
however, and that means that he is buried too deeply in acquired ways of thinking.
There is no hope for him, in that case.

In the Dao without Cultivating the Dao

Cultivation is named as such because it
provides a method of cultivating oneself, a path to walk. There was a saying in the
past to the effect of, “This person doesn’t cultivate the Dao, and yet he is
in the Dao.” While following a lesser path, he values “nothingness,” or
“emptiness.” He lives out his life in this world by following the course of fate. He
is at peace with the world. He thinks, “Give it to me if it is meant to be mine, and
if it is not, I don’t want it.” He does not follow the typical forms of cultivation.
He doesn’t even know what “cultivation” is. Yet there are masters taking care of
people like him. And he seldom gets into disagreements with others. This is what
people used to call “In the Dao without cultivating the Dao.” Ordinary
people can also, like them, manage to refrain from seeking things, but ultimately
they will not gain a celestial rank. Such a person will not gain gong, and
can merely store up limitless virtue, a large sum. And many people will do harm to
him, for a good person does not have it easy. But this results merely in a large
amount of virtue. If he takes up a practice, it will naturally turn into a great
deal of gong. If he doesn’t take up a practice, he will probably be blessed
in his next life, becoming a high-ranking official or making a fortune. By contrast,
most of the people who are in the Dao without cultivating it have special
backgrounds, of course, and there are people looking after them. He’s in a state of
not cultivating the Dao, and yet his thoughts, his realm, are in the
Dao, and so in the future he will return to his original place. Without
cultivating the Dao, he is cultivating it—someone is transforming gong
for him though he doesn’t know it. His life is full of misfortune, and he suffers
and pays off his karma. His xinxing quietly improves over the course of his
life, and such is always his state. These are people with special backgrounds. It is
hard for an ordinary person to do this.

Confucius left to man a way of acting that
is befitting a human—the Doctrine of the Mean. Lao Zi taught a method for
cultivation. But as it turns out, Chinese people combined Confucian ideas with those
of the Daoist school. And, beginning in the Song dynasty, Buddhist ideas started to
find their way in. Thereafter Buddhist thought thus changed beyond recognition. And
after the Song dynasty, Buddhism incorporated things from Chinese Confucianism, such
as filial piety and the like—much content of the sort. But the Buddhist school
doesn’t actually contain anything like that. The Buddhist school takes human matters
lightly, and in its view, who knows how many parents a person has had over his many
lifetimes. Only when you let go of all such attachments and cultivate with a quiet
and calm mind can you meet with success. They are attachments. So, after Confucian
thought was introduced [into Buddhism], the attachment of familial affection arose.

The Story of Creating Man Out of Clay

Human beings exist here at the lowest of
levels, and above there are layers upon layers of heavens. A Tathagata is at this
level. Jesus belonged to the level of Tathagata, as did Lao Zi. What they could see
at that level was limited to that which was there and below them. They could see
very little of what was above them, let alone much further above. This was due to
their levels dictating how much wisdom they possessed.

Then as for the idea of creating man out of
clay that Jesus knew about, it was an expression that he was using which came from
the being he regarded as Lord—“God created man out of clay.” Was he referring to the
clay that ordinary people know of? He wasn’t. It wasn’t clay as ordinary people know
it. Rather, in higher dimensions all material, including clay, is high-energy matter
of a more microcosmic plane. Then at what point was the “man” that he described
created? Was it done before the dawn of civilization on Earth, or at some other
time? There was actually an account to this effect contained in a distant legend,
and he told it to people—i.e., that God created man out of clay.

But in reality, it’s not the clay from this
human side. The clay on the other side has power, and the things that make up that
side are, if brought over here, similar to gong. What he meant was that [man]
was created on the other side. Celestial beings have skin finer and more delicate
than ours here. That is due to their not having cells that are comprised of the same
layer of substances as ours are; theirs are comprised of finer and tinier
substances. When they were pushed over into this dimension of ordinary man, it
turned out they were the same as man. It was just that they looked extraordinarily
beautiful with an especially delicate appearance. This meant that a larger bodily
layer of cellular matter had to be added for man. And it is thus that human beings
assume the appearance they do.

The people in the heavens have bodies, too,
and they look the same as us when they fly over here. Underneath the large mountains
of China are buried the corpses of celestial beings. When they died their bodies
were buried under the mountains. These people look about the same as human beings,
contrary to what was described in the scriptures. When Jesus was in the world he
actually didn’t leave people any scriptures. Rather, it was people after him, his
followers, who wrote them, and they did so in accordance with their own times.
Buddha Shakyamuni did not leave behind any scriptures, either; it was likewise his
followers who wrote them. So it was a case of their followers having heard what was
said, but failing to grasp what the original meaning was, what kind of people they
were referring to, or in what historical context the things described took place.

[Jesus] said that man was created out of
clay, which left ordinary people puzzled, thinking “Our bodies aren’t clay.” The
idea is that the clay at extremely high levels is superior to the material of our
flesh bodies. The higher the plane, the more superior it is.

In a considerably remote time prior to the
existence of low-level man, the beings above created man in other dimensions. The
moment I would say to a dimension that something be formed, it would immediately
take form. And any object could be created at the mere thought of it—trace a finger
in the air and it would form, albeit in other dimensions. In other words, what was
said in the past about creating the world, about creating a plane of the heavens, or
what the Buddhist scriptures said in regards to creating the universe—those things
were all manifestations of the power of Buddhas. What this tells us is, positive
karma, good karma, and evil karma were all generalized by them as “karma.” So those
things were created by Buddhas.

A Buddha of great power really can create a
plane of the heavens instantly, and the higher the Buddha’s level, the more
magnificent is the heaven he makes. And what’s more, he needn’t use his hands;
merely opening his mouth and saying so is sufficient. And for an even higher Buddha,
a single thought is enough—with just a thought it is brought about. That’s why
Buddhas whose levels are higher than that of Tathagata cannot manage ordinary human
affairs; at the formation of just one thought, things on Earth would immediately
change. But even a Tathagata Buddha doesn’t handle things directly here. Rather, he
merely gives guidance, and Bodhisattvas put things into action.

The Confines of Modern Science and the Breadth and Profundity of
Buddha Fa

Even with the Dharma that Buddha Shakyamuni
imparted, human beings have been able to sense the vastness of Buddha Fa. But the
Fa is simply enormous—truly so. What Buddha Shakyamuni taught was, given his
level, Tathagata Fa. And even that seemed very high to ordinary people. In the past,
only a Tathagata could be called a Buddha. Neither a Bodhisattva nor an Arhat was a
Buddha; neither had reached the realm of a Buddha. So it used to be that whenever
someone said the term “Buddha,” it was referring to a Tathagata. But Tathagata is
not the highest status in the universe; rather, it is the lowest level of Buddha.
And among the Buddhas, only those at the lowest level look after ordinary human
affairs. Buddhas of too high a level cannot do so, for the moment they opened their
mouths, changes on Earth would occur. How could that be allowed? They can’t get
involved in the least. It is thus Tathagatas alone who look after human things.
Tathagatas don’t personally handle things, however. It is Bodhisattvas who do things
to save people. So even just attaining the level of Tathagata is extraordinary.

At the microscopic level [a Tathagata] can
perceive three thousand chiliocosms in a single grain of sand. In Buddha
Shakyamuni’s teachings there is the theory of three thousand chiliocosms. He said
that in the Milky Way there were three thousand planets resembling that of man,
containing lives identical to human beings. There are in fact more than three
thousand. He also said that there are three thousand chiliocosms in a grain of sand.
That is, in but a single grain of sand there exist three thousand worlds like this
that man inhabits, something unfathomable. When the celestial eye is opened, one can
see things as if they are magnified, and see tiny things such as those at the
microcosmic level. But, just imagine this. There are three thousand chiliocosms in a
single grain of sand. Then, the three thousand chiliocosms in that grain of sand
have seas and rivers in them, don’t they? Then, are there another three thousand
chiliocosms in the sand of those rivers? So, even Buddha Shakyamuni had not seen the
origin of matter. He thus said, “Its smallness is such that there is no interior,”
meaning that it is so small that the origin of matter is imperceptible.

Today physics can merely figure out that a
molecule is made up of atoms, and that an atom is made up of a nucleus and
electrons. Further into the microcosm there are quarks and neutrinos. And that’s as
far as it can go, that is all. Then what is, moving further downward, the origin of
matter? Not even microscopes can detect quarks and neutrinos. Their existence is
known only through the help of other instruments. As for answering what lies further
down, man’s technology falls woefully short. As to large things, man believes that
planets are the largest objects. But that’s not how Buddha Shakyamuni saw it. What
Buddha Shakyamuni saw was in fact very sizable. He discovered that planets were not
the largest. Peering further upwards, he couldn’t see the zenith, however. In the
end he thus said, “Its largeness is such that there is no exterior.” So his
statement that, “Its largeness is such that there is no exterior; its smallness is
such that there is no interior,” meant that it is so large there is no boundary to
it, and so tiny that its bottom cannot be seen.

Living beings are complex, and the
structure of the universe is extremely complex. The knowledge possessed by man today
has reached its peak. Having peaked, it has become something that limits the
development of man’s science. For example, many accomplished scientists have set
forth axioms in the fields of physics and chemistry. Within the confines of those
axioms, what they say indeed holds true. And it’s fine to build upon them. However,
truth is a many-tiered thing. When you surpass their axioms, you will find that the
axioms have in fact served to limit people.

Things are no different for the science of
recent times. Some people set forth a definition of science, and so something is
considered “science” only if it conforms to that definition. And when you stay
within its boundaries, everyone thinks that is science. When you go beyond its
definition, you discover that it has served to limit mankind’s advancement. Nothing
that is intangible or invisible is allowed there, so the limitations it imposes
are significant. The Buddhas, Daoist deities, and Gods we speak of exist in other
dimensions that man cannot touch or see. Then if those beings were to be discovered
using the methods of today’s science, wouldn’t that make them scientifically proven?
It would! But the West has set forth a definition of science, and anything that
modern science is unable to explain gets categorized as theology or religion,
without exception. It dares not acknowledge such things.

Western science has gone to an extreme. The
Buddhist school holds that everything goes through the stages of formation, stasis,
and degeneration. Formation means taking shape, while stasis means remaining in a
certain phase. The science from Europe, confined by the framework it established,
now finds itself unable to advance further. Were it to keep probing downward, what
might be discovered would be something beyond the boundaries of its science. So it
categorically lumps these things together as religion or theology. But if someone
discovers things that don’t exist in the present body of scientific knowledge, and
does so by way of man’s modern science and technology, or discovers things that are
intangible and invisible and studies them with the scientific method of our day,
isn’t that scientific? The problem is that the definition of science has long been
set in stone, and anything beyond its boundaries is categorically denied. No room is
thus left for further progress.

And there are some scientists, figures who
are considered “accomplished” in certain fields, who have set forth a great many
axioms. These scientists, such as Newton and Einstein, were very accomplished by the
standards of ordinary people and could perceive far more than the average person.
And the axioms they set forth, as with their scientific legacy, stands as a wealth
of valuable knowledge. But that said, any research that takes place or understanding
that’s arrived at via working within the boundaries of their thought is bound to
observe certain patterns. If those who come after them work completely within the
theoretical frameworks of these scientists, posterity will never surpass them nor
experience new breakthroughs.

When someone’s discovery or invention
surpasses the confines of previously held axioms, it will be realized that the
axioms set forth had been restricting people. That’s because there are higher forms
of knowledge, and higher truths, to be found at higher levels. A good example is our
knowledge of matter. It used to be that the smallest particle of matter known to man
was the atomic nucleus. That’s no longer the case, however, for now there are quarks
and then neutrinos. The point is that human beings have continually learned more
about such things. But a new axiom itself will, upon the discovery of something
else, serve as yet another restriction. Such is the case. The fact is that such
axioms usually serve to limit people.

Einstein was no ordinary person. He found
what religion, and even theology, taught to be true. Man’s understanding of the
physical world is limited to the knowledge of human beings, much like the scientific
axioms that have been set forth. Were people’s research to truly probe deeper, and
their endeavors to progress further, they would find what religion has taught to be
true. The lives that exist on a plane one level higher than man thus represent a
science and technology one level higher, and their understanding of the world via
the science and technology at their command surpasses that of ordinary human beings.
That is why Einstein, upon having reached the pinnacle of human science and
technology and then probing deeper in his work, found what religion taught to be
fully real. In recent times many scientists and philosophers have ultimately turned
to religion—and these are persons of quite some accomplishment. By contrast, those
who are currently paralyzed by the limitations set forth by contemporary science and
their blind faith in it categorically brand those things [beyond the reach of
science] “pseudoscience.”
1

“All Practices Return to One”

The saying that “all practices return to
one” is something normally taught within the context of one specific cultivation
way. The Daoist school holds that there are thirty-six hundred practices, all of
which can lead to the Dao. The Buddhist school holds that it has eighty-four
thousand practices by which one can cultivate Buddhahood. If someone tries to
combine several different religions and practice them together at the same time,
however, that is something altogether different [from what the saying refers to].
How could human beings know divine matters? What they are trying to do is just utter
nonsense.

In the old China there was a group known as
“Way of Unity” (Yiguandao). The group, which came into being in the late Qing
dynasty, promoted the integration of five religions. It was a heretical sect, and
from the moment it appeared in the Qing, people sought to vanquish it; the emperors
of the Great Qing sought to destroy it. Early in the Republican period, the
Nationalist Party (KMT) likewise sought to destroy it, executing its members in
droves. When the Communist Party took power in the revolution, it similarly killed
the group’s members by the dozen. Why did that happen? Nothing in ordinary human
society is in fact by chance. The unfolding of history merely follows along with
celestial changes. Thus, whatever happens in human society is not merely the product
of someone doing something on the spur of the moment. In other words, it was not
ordinary people who wanted to crush it; rather, it was Heaven’s will. Higher beings
wanted it destroyed and would not permit its existence. That nonsense about
“integrating five religions” was a serious case of undermining the Fa. It was
a case of demons acting out among men.

Not even Celestial Worthy of Primordial
Beginning or Buddha Shakyamuni was so bold as to suggest the union or fusion of
Buddhist and Daoist. How could that happen! Even within Buddhism itself, it is
taught that no two cultivation ways can be mixed together. Those who practice Pure
Land can’t practice Zen, for example. The two can’t be mixed. And those who
cultivate Zen cannot practice Tiantai or Huayan. You simply cannot blend different
ways together when you cultivate. And why is that? It’s because evolving gong
is something extremely complex. You have only one body, and it resembles a type of
raw material being fed into a machine. Your gong is produced in that machine.
Everything has to be meticulously arranged for you—be it the method used to save
you, each step that is to be taken, the form in which each type of gong is
evolved, etc. But if halfway through your journey you were to be put into a
different machine, what would be the outcome? Could you still cultivate? You tell
me. You would be a complete mess. You would become a heap of scrap.

Many people have failed to progress in
their practice precisely on account of cultivating irresponsibly like that. What
Buddha Shakyamuni truly meant by “no second cultivation way” (bu er fa-men),
was that there cannot be mixing in cultivation. Later the saying “no second
cultivation way” was misunderstood, and taken to mean something else. But mixing
practices is strictly forbidden. The Way of Unity taught about the “union of five
religions”—something Heaven’s laws forbid. Yet now the group has resurfaced in
Taiwan. In the Age of Law’s End no one is going step in, and that is because no one
is managing human affairs in this period. Man has turned ever worse, so all [divine
beings] have let go of their hold and no longer look after things. Nor do they save
people. Those who profess a faith in the Buddha or worship him aren’t interested in
rigorous cultivation. Rather, they merely want wealth or to dispel adversity. It is
that bad.

People still think that what it [the Way of
Unity] teaches makes sense, however. The thoughts in the mind of a cultivator, as
well as someone with religious belief, are quite crucial. Some cultivation ways
depend completely on faith and don’t include any techniques, so when your mind has
other things mixed in, it will foul up what your practice cultivates. It was never
meant to include any such physical movements. Besides, demons now pervade the human
world, and are bringing about mankind’s ruin. Doesn’t everyone possess good thoughts
(shan nian)? That is precisely what demons are out to destroy, causing you to
fail at cultivation.

Zen Buddhism Is Extreme

There are two types of people, namely,
those who are extreme and those who take the middle road. From the outset Zen
Buddhism has been in the extreme category, and it does not amount to a cultivation
system. Controversy has always surrounded Zen. Though people have cultivated
according to Zen’s methods, they have actually been under the care of Buddha
Shakyamuni, owing to their intention to cultivate Buddhahood and their seeking
goodness. Zen doesn’t constitute a system. Boddhidharma does not have his own
heavenly kingdom, and thus cannot provide salvation to people. The fact is that
Boddhidharma himself, back in his day, took Buddha Shakyamuni to be the founding
master. Though he is called Zen’s patriarch, he was in fact Buddha Shakyamuni’s
disciple—a disciple of the twenty-eighth generation, and one who very much venerated
Buddha Shakyamuni. Working from Buddha Shakyamuni’s theories, he focused his
enlightenment on “nothingness,” and this didn’t depart from the tenets of
Shakyamuni. With the passage of time, Zen went downhill. Later generations came to
regard Boddhidharma’s approach as a cultivation way in its own right, and believed
it to be supreme. His wasn’t supreme, however. Zen was actually declining with each
successive generation, and Boddhidharma said it himself: His teachings would only
extend for six generations.

Boddhidharma gave a relatively large amount
of weight to the “nothingness” that Buddha Shakyamuni taught, and held Buddha
Shakyamuni in great esteem; he was known as his disciple of the twenty-eighth
generation. But the generations that followed were completely trapped in extremes.
And once that became the case, it arrived at the stage of degeneration, where
Boddhidharma and Shakyamuni were seen almost as equals. People began to venerate
Boddhidharma, and considered Boddhidharma’s theories to be the one and only Buddhist
truth. This basically amounted to going astray.

That’s because Boddhidharma cultivated to a
low level and reached only the celestial rank of Arhat—meaning, he was merely an
Arhat. How much could he really have known? When all was said and done he had not
reached the level of Tathagata. The gap between his level and that of Buddha
Shakyamuni was phenomenal! And for this reason, his teachings are closest to the
philosophy of ordinary people, and his theories are easiest for ordinary people to
accept—particularly those who treat religion as a form of philosophy or ideology.
Those who take an academic approach and study Buddhism as philosophy tend to accept
his theory the most. It closely resembles ordinary philosophy.

Buddhas are to be found on every plane,
however high one may go. [But according to Zen,] you cultivate and cultivate, and
then, supposedly, nothing exists. In their cultivation they don’t even acknowledge
so much as human beings. Living, visible human beings are right here before us and
yet they don’t acknowledge them as real. It’s even worse than with those ordinary
persons of poor spiritual insight who say, “I’ll believe it if I see it, and won’t
if I don’t.” These people don’t even acknowledge what they do see. Why live, then?
Why bother opening your eyes? Shut your eyes, don’t lie down, don’t stand… Nothing
exists, right? They’ve gone to extremes. Boddhidharma said that his Dharma could be
passed down for only six generations. It’s folly how people today still cling
tightly to this doctrine that was never valid in the first place. It’s a dead end
that they have gone down. They don’t acknowledge themselves, don’t acknowledge
Buddhas, and how about planet Earth? If they don’t acknowledge even their own
existence, what’s the point of having a name? And what’s the point of eating? You
could just go hungry all day, not look at what time it is, and block out all sounds…

And after all that, everything is gone. So
doesn’t that discredit Buddha Shakyamuni? If Buddha Shakyamuni didn’t teach
anything, what was he doing for forty-nine years? Do they know what the true meaning
of “emptiness” is in Buddha Shakyamuni’s teaching? When Buddha Shakyamuni [said that
he] didn’t leave behind any Fa, he was saying that he didn’t truly teach the
cultivation method or the Fa of the universe. What he spoke about were only
things at his cultivation level, and what he left to ordinary people was Tathagata
Fa—in particular, cultivation experiences and lessons learned. The real Dharma that
Shakyamuni imparted when in this world was the rules and disciplines (jie-lü),
and he discussed certain insights of different levels, which is the Fa at a
certain level. But Buddha Shakyamuni didn’t want people to be trapped at his level,
and thus said, “I have not taught any Dharma in my life.” He said that because he
knew that the Dharma he taught was not the highest. A Tathagata is a Buddha, but not
one at the highest level. Buddha Fa is boundless. A cultivator shouldn’t be limited
by his Dharma. A person with a great spiritual potential (da gen-ji) can
cultivate even higher, where insights both higher and deeper, as with corresponding
manifestations of Fa, await.

Levels in the Course of Cultivation

One’s cultivation level is something that
some cultivators come to know in the course of cultivation, rather than something
all who cultivate will necessarily know. Most cultivators will know it only after
having reached a state of enlightenment or having reached high levels surpassing
Triple-World-Law. Those who do know can discern their levels from the colors of the
gong that comes forth from their bodies. It can be discerned from the
person’s gong column or the body itself. In Triple-World-Law cultivation, the
gong that emerges first is red, and when the person’s level elevates, it
becomes orange, then yellow, then green, etc., with there being nine colors in
all—i.e., red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet, colored, and colorless.
To see which level you are at, one look will suffice. If you have attained a
translucent body and continue to cultivate upward, it will be
Beyond-Triple-World-Law cultivation that you do. You will have gained a celestial
rank and begun the initial phase of Arhat Fa cultivation. Doing
Beyond-Triple-World-Law cultivation means that you have surpassed the Three Realms
and are no longer subject to reincarnation. If you end your cultivation at this
stage, you are an Arhat. If you continue to cultivate onward, you will be
cultivating at the eminent rank of Arhat, and that level has coloration as well.
However, the colors of red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, and violet here are
different from those in Triple-World-Law. The colors in Triple-World-Law cultivation
are dense, similar to those of human beings. But at that [Arhat] level, they are
translucent gradations of red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet, colored,
and colorless. With further cultivation, there are more sets of nine colors, with
the difference being that they are more translucent, more exquisite, and more
beautiful. It repeats in this manner over and over. Where a person is in cultivation
can thus be discerned.

But people aren’t allowed to see this, and
things aren’t so apparent to ordinary people, because there is the matter of insight
(wu). If what the body cultivated were displayed in plain view, what would be
left to insight? Everyone would cultivate, everyone would do it. Who wouldn’t?
Everything would be so real. Even people with unpardonable sins, incorrigible as
they may be, would come to learn it. There would be no question of insight. And if
that were the case, cultivation would be impossible. Some people say, “I’ll keep my
eyes open, and if I can see things clearly, I’ll learn it.” But that won’t do. If
such a person could see everything, with things being crystal clear, that would be
the end of his cultivation prospects. He wouldn’t be allowed to cultivate. The
reason is, a person needs to emerge from the delusion by way of insight, and only
that counts as cultivation. If a person achieved total insight and could see
everything, he would not be allowed to cultivate. And why is that? Because it
wouldn’t count if he were to cultivate, for he would have seen that everything
[cultivation talks about] is real. He would have seen the causal workings of the
quarrels people have, and that those who take advantage of others give virtue to
them. If reality were fully laid out before him, of course he would take up
cultivation. But would that count as doing cultivation? It would amount to grabbing
something that’s there for the taking. Human attachments wouldn’t be removed that
way.

A person has to come to his own
realizations while removing human attachments in the midst of strife. Were he able
to see everything as if it were crystal clear, it wouldn’t be cultivation. Why is it
hard for a Buddha to raise his level? Because he has no quarrels and sees everything
clearly. How can he cultivate? It is harder for him to cultivate. And that is why
they want to go among ordinary people and cultivate. Only when one cultivates in
delusion is rapid elevation possible. It is possible, though, that some people will
see a little bit as they cultivate. But the details won’t of course be revealed to
any human being.

When a person cultivates, the matter of
insight runs throughout, start to finish, and he has to cultivate amidst delusion.
The West values faith, and stresses this from beginning to end. Without faith,
everything else is out of the question. As long as you have faith, there will be a
response [from God]. When some people have repented before Jesus’ image, their minds
really have sensed that Jesus was listening and that there was someone responding to
their questions. Such is the means of cultivation in the West. Religious faith is a
type of cultivation. When Jesus was ready to receive his followers in his heavenly
kingdom, if the person’s body was devoid of gong or energy, the person could
not enter Heaven. And on top of that, the bad thoughts the person formed among human
beings and the karma on his body would lead the special property of the universe at
high levels to restrict him; and in the case of someone who was really bad, both his
body and soul would have disintegrated [had he gone there], with nothing remaining.
That scenario is untenable. So it won’t work without gong. The gong is
thus evolved for the person on the other side as his faith grows, as he goes through
confession, and as he continuously tries to improve and be a good person. Although
he develops gong, he is not told about it, for [in the West] they have taught
only about being a good person; they have not taught about gong. The same
holds true with Buddhist monks. They don’t do any [qigong-type] exercises, so
how do they develop gong? Their gong grows even though they aren’t
told that they have gong.

Buddhist and Daoist

The Daoist school practices solitary
cultivation; the Daoist religion should not exist. The Daoist religion is in fact
the product of reforms that took place in recent history. There was never such a
thing as religious Daoism in any prehistoric era. The reason is, the Daoist school
does not aim to offer salvation to all sentient beings; instead, it teaches solitary
cultivation, and the practice of quietude. So it cultivates insight into Zhen.
Of Zhen, Shan, and Ren, it focuses its cultivation on insight
into what is True, it nurtures one’s innate nature by cultivating Zhen, and
aspires to return to what is original and true. The Dao dictates that
cultivation be done in quietude, so [the Daoist school] really has no wish
whatsoever to broadly save sentient beings. When a Daoist has finished his
cultivation, he will be a roaming deity or a wandering immortal. There are mountains
and waters in the heavens just as here, and he will stay on one such mountain. The
Daoist religion was in fact born of ordinary human beings’ attachments. People are
fond of banding together and forming some kind of power base, as they crave
recognition and personal gain. So things like this tend to come about.

In reality the Daoist religion does not
exist. A Daoist teaches his disciple to cultivate in solitude. Although the Daoist
religion was created and it has many disciples, not all of them receive the true
teaching. If a master finds a good disciple, he will teach him the true things. And
if there are no good disciples, he will opt for a carefree and easy life, doing
whatever he would like to. [He can do that] because he has attained the Dao
and the true freedom that comes with it.

Buddhist is Buddhist, and Daoist is Daoist.
Mixing together the teachings of the two schools is completely out of the question.
What we are practicing, however, is truly enormous. Our practice is based upon the
universe itself, and everything is encompassed. Our foundation lies with the
Buddhist school, and what we have, be it our main tenets or our characteristics, is
Buddhist. But this Fa transcends both Buddhist and Daoist. Different
understandings are found at different levels, and different manifestations appear at
different levels. Those in the Falun Paradise have their knowledge, while beyond the
Falun Paradise there is higher knowledge, and still higher above, there are even
higher forms of knowledge.

There is another topic, namely, that of the
primeval gods. There is no point in discussing this with today’s cultivators,
however, for it is unfathomable to them, being beyond their reach. It is thus that I
speak only of the two schools of Buddhist and Daoist. Speaking at too high of a
plane doesn’t work; people cannot accept such things. They are not allowed to know.

No Demonstrations When Saving People and Teaching Fa

Teaching the real Fa to ordinary
people who cultivate as monks—monks who haven’t enlightened—is useless, as they know
nothing. The monks who have enlightened aren’t to be found in the secular world;
they have gone deep into mountains and forests. They know about me. It’s only
ordinary people who do not. Many accomplished cultivators know about me. They have
sometimes quietly approached, taken a look, and then departed. There have also been
some who came and said a few things. Despite the fact that they have cultivated in
the mountains and forests for hundreds or thousands of years, their cultivation
levels are not high. That’s because the path they take is arduous and not the Great
Path of cultivation. They cultivate via lesser paths, and for that reason have not
achieved their ultimate rank despite having cultivated for a long period of time.
They don’t mix with the secular world, however, so their supernatural abilities are
not locked and they are capable of fully displaying their divine powers. Those who
cultivate in the secular world usually have the bulk of their great abilities
locked. Were they not, a mere thought might move a building to a different
location—something impermissible. Disrupting human affairs is absolutely prohibited.
People would think that such a person’s level was high. An ordinary person thinks
that whoever is able to demonstrate his abilities is at a high level. What
qigong masters demonstrate in public displays are merely lesser abilities and
skills, things so meager as to be pitiable. Those things are really nothing. Yet
ordinary people think those are of a high level.

I refrain from giving demonstrations when I
teach the Fa specifically because I have explained the purpose of my going
public in perfectly clear terms. Were I to give demonstrations while teaching
Fa, that would be imparting an evil way. Doing it that way, people would come
to learn your techniques, not the Fa. Buddha Shakyamuni similarly avoided
this approach back in his day. Doing healings is fine since, after all, the workings
of it can’t be seen. All that’s apparent is that the person feels better. How did
the healing happen? It’s up to you to believe the whole thing or not. The person is
better now, but do you believe that he is? An onlooker can’t tell whether he is
still in pain. Since one’s powers of insight are still involved, doing healings is
okay. Once upon a time Jesus and Buddha Shakyamuni did the same. Lao Zi was the
exception. Lao Zi knew the human world to be too perilous. He hurriedly wrote his
five-thousand-word treatise [on the Dao]
2 and headed out through the pass, going west.

The human world is extremely complex. Just
looking at a person here on Earth, there is no telling which dimension he is from.
The divinity in that dimension still wants to have charge over him. What matters is
whether this individual can discern; if he can, then he will be able to return [to
where he came from]. But he [that divinity] may know that this human being is no
longer up to the task, so he can do no more for him. He doesn’t want to let him go,
however. Back when Jesus came forth to save people, [these divinities] thought that
he was meddling in their affairs. “This person is mine, and it should be to my place
that he is saved to. Why have you encroached upon our domain?” They wouldn’t stand
for it. It was because of such a mindset [that they acted as they did]. If you think
about it, it’s not right. Jesus didn’t care who belonged to whom. Saving people was
the goal of his coming. He saw that all beings were suffering and wished to give
them salvation, to allow them to ascend. So as it was, Jesus affected the many
divinities of a variety of dimensions. Ultimately their disagreements intensified to
such a tremendous extent that they manifested over in the human world, just as human
conflicts might, and the entire brunt of it landed upon Jesus. Jesus could not free
himself of it, with the only option being death—he was thus crucified, thereby
dissolving the enmity that existed between them. With Jesus’ ordinary body of flesh
gone, there was no Jesus there to make enemies with, and that put an end to his
countless troubles. That is why it’s said Jesus gave his life for all of humanity.
That is the idea.

Buddha Shakyamuni likewise experienced
great hardships teaching his Dharma. He constantly did battle with the seven
religions then in India. At that time, early Brahmanism was powerful. In the end,
Buddha Shakyamuni departed without having achieved the true goal he set out to
achieve.

Lao Zi left after writing his book of
five-thousand words, leaving things for posterity to carry out. That was how it was
supposed to be done, and it was Heaven’s will. That’s because the Daoist school was
not to be made into a religion; the formation of the Daoist religion was a mistake.
A Daoist teaches solitary cultivation, the cultivation of Zhen, and
cultivating quietude, so things are passed on to one select disciple. It is done
that way because he selects his disciple, and will teach only someone who is good.
He cannot offer salvation broadly, and doesn’t have the desire to do so. He
cultivates Zhen. While you might see a group of disciples at a Daoist temple,
only one has been chosen, and he alone will receive the transmission. The rest just
serve as a foil. So there shouldn’t be a religion in the Daoist school. In the past
they always did solitary cultivation in the mountains.

What Confucius taught were principles for
personal conduct, not cultivation. His teachings have benefited the Chinese people,
nevertheless. The Doctrine of the Mean can enable someone to gain an invincible
position. Things go in the opposite direction after reaching an extreme, and thus
something or someone might well fall after reaching the peak. That’s the point of
seeking “the mean,” to always hold fast to the middle ground. When a person doesn’t
seek to be the highest and is comfortably higher than those below, that person will
never fail. Anything, when carried to an extreme, will reverse course. This is in
reference to ordinary people.

There are many cultivators deep in the
mountains and forests who have seen events of the past and future transpiring. Yet
none of them have gotten involved in those affairs, and nor have they wished to.
Their detachment stems from knowing that those events are the result of celestial
changes. [They know] that’s how things are supposed to be.

Whoever defies the will of Heaven will face
consequences, and so people don’t dare to do so. Everyone sings the praises of Yue
Fei, yet why couldn’t he save the Southern Song dynasty? Wasn’t the Yue family so
powerful? Such was the will of Heaven. Yue Fei was bent on preserving the Song, but
he just couldn’t succeed, for in reality he was going against the will of Heaven.
The Song dynasty was destined to perish, but he insisted to the contrary, and thus
went against the will of Heaven. I’m just illustrating a point here. “The best laid
plans of mice and men often go awry,” as it’s said. I am not saying that Yue Fei was
bad. I was just explaining the idea.

What a person considers, from his human
vantage point, to be right, may not necessarily be right. Whether it was the First
Emperor of Qin or Emperor Wu of the Han dynasty, whichever emperor it was or
whatever he did, those who come after such a figure will pass judgment on him.
Ordinary people see things from their own individual perspectives and through the
lens of their inherent notions, and what they believe to be good or bad is not
necessarily so. Also, the criteria by which a person determines whether someone or
something is good or bad revolves around himself: “If he’s good to me, then I say
he’s good. If what he does benefits me, then I say he’s good.” So that person he
approves of may or may not be truly good. The only criterion with which to judge
what is good and bad is the special property of the universe, the Fa. It will
never change, it is the truth of the universe, and it is the single criterion by
which good and bad are to be determined. The First Emperor of Qin killed many people
in the course of unifying China. He killed the rulers of many states, and everyone
cursed him. The rulers and peoples of various states were brought under his rule,
and everyone thus hated and cursed him. They all judged him from their own
perspectives. His unification of China was inevitable. It was the outcome of
celestial changes. Had he not acted in accord with the will of Heaven, he would not
have succeeded and unification would have failed. Human affairs are thus no more
than that. As cultivators we never comment on them. A cultivator will not take an
interest in politics, lest he be a politician, not a cultivator.

When mankind reaches a certain point in
time, its karma is enormous, and it is beyond redemption. Enormous karma such as
that is something man can never pay off. He accumulates, over the course of many
lifetimes, karma so massive that it is impossible to pay off, and thus these people
are destined to be destroyed. What is meant by “be destroyed”? Small disasters take
place and destroy people. War is the most expedient way, and that’s why history is
what it is.

The founding emperor of each era had
certain warrior entities incarnate alongside him, protecting him and helping him
wage war. That was specifically what those warrior entities were meant to do. So
their efforts would bring them no merit, but neither would they generate karma—they
were just carrying out their task. How many people, even over the long course of
history, have seen this for what it is?

What a Buddha Does is Save People, Not Bless and Protect

The Buddhist school is not in the least
about helping people to get rich. Illness is caused by karma, so neither has it
shown people how to regain health. When Shakyamuni’s teachings talked about “broadly
saving sentient beings,” he was referring to freeing people from the hardship of
ordinary existence and delivering them to the other shore, nirvana. That was
what Buddha Shakyamuni taught. It was about your ascension to a heavenly kingdom.
The same was true of what Jesus taught, and neither was higher than the other. It’s
just that modern people don’t get it. They talk about how Buddha can bless and
protect people, heal you of disease, make you rich, and how the great awakened ones
have boundless power and can save people. Ordinary people mistake a Buddha’s offer
of salvation for protection, and then ask Buddha for blessings, protection, and
wealth, they ask Buddha to heal them, and so on. But Buddhas don’t in fact get
involved in such things whatsoever. That is a perverse idea that arises from the
corruption of modern man’s thinking, and it is degenerate. The Buddhist
sutras never implied anything of the sort originally. I thus often discuss
this matter, and say that while you might burn incense and pray to Buddha in hopes
of wealth, Buddha couldn’t care less whether you get wealthy.

You want to pray to Buddha in that way, but
a Buddha has no interest in your achieving wealth. Just the opposite, he asks you to
cease your greed. If you really have trouble getting by in daily life, then he might
provide material means, but only so as to ensure your personal welfare. He won’t
have you get rich if you aren’t supposed to. And illness, in the eyes of a Buddha,
is the result of karma owed from one’s previous life or lives. When some people
prostrate themselves before a Buddha statue looking for money, they do indeed get
money as a result. But what kind of wealth do they actually get? There was no Buddha
on that statue. It was a false Buddha rather, which came into existence via worship.
Or it might be a fox that attached itself there, or a snake, a weasel, etc. It
helped you make money since, in effect, you worshipped it and asked it for money.
But if it’s going to help you make money, there are strings attached. There is a
principle in the universe, namely: no loss, no gain. It capitalizes on this
principle, as it desires a human body. A person kowtows in search of money, so [it
says], “Go right ahead!” If the things the person carries aren’t good, it will
ignore him, and he won’t make any money; his worship will go unanswered. If it
determines that your body carries good things, it will let you get money, for then
it can take those good things from you. If you want money, of course it will give it
to you. But the person involved isn’t aware of all this, and what he loses is apt to
be irrevocably gone. A person lives more than one life, and [after such worship] he
is apt to lead a more wretched life the next time around.

The Decline of Mankind and Dangerous Notions

If back in ancient China someone spoke of
cultivating the Way, people would say he had a “virtuous foundation.” Those who
talked about Buddhas, Daoist deities, or Gods were considered really good. Yet,
today, talk of cultivating Buddhahood or the Dao invites laughter. Mankind’s
moral values have undergone enormous changes. They are sliding downward a thousand
miles a day, so quickly. With the erosion of their values, people have actually come
to believe that the ancients were ignorant and superstitious. Man’s thinking has
changed dramatically, and it is frightening. Consider that Buddha Shakyamuni once
said: The changes in society with the Age of Law’s End will be truly terrible. Case
in point, in today’s society people have no law in the heart (xin-fa) that
might serve as a restraint, especially in China. This is true in other countries as
well, though it assumes different forms. In mainland China, the Cultural Revolution
shattered the so-called “old thinking and ideas” that people had, and forbade people
to believe in the teachings of Confucius. People were left with no moral restraint
or moral code, and weren’t allowed to have religious beliefs. People came to
disbelieve that doing wrong would lead to karmic retribution.

When people no longer have the inner-law in
their minds serving as a restraint, won’t they dare to do just about anything? This
is the most serious problem that mankind now faces. Some foreigners don’t dare to go
to China for business, especially on account of how quick some Chinese youth are to
knife or kill someone. It’s awful. China is now worse than other countries. A major
factor is that when overseas movies or TV programs that portray gang warfare get
into the mainland, viewers mistakenly think that Hong Kong and other countries are
really as chaotic as they’re portrayed. They’re not like that, however. That’s
merely cinematic dramatization meant to draw thrill-seeking viewers. The reality is,
people living abroad have far better character and are more civilized than people in
China. Yet Chinese youth mimic those things. Because China was isolated for some
time, its people mistakenly think, after suddenly seeing those things, that that’s
how things are abroad.

The gangster businessmen depicted in the TV
series The Bund have been eagerly imitated in China. Yet it was only a
portrayal of the old Shanghai of the 1930s, and took artistic license, at that. Real
life wasn’t like that. Hong Kong’s gangster movies and TV programs have had a
terrible influence on mainland China in terms of people’s thinking. Mankind’s values
have changed, and in China too we now see homosexuality, drug abuse, drug
trafficking, organized crime, promiscuous sex, and prostitution. It’s gotten out of
hand! There’s a saying about how when a poor country bumpkin strikes it rich, look
out. He has no self-control and will dare to do anything. Isn’t it scary to see
mankind reaching this point? What will become of mankind when things go still
further? The concepts of good and bad are now inverted in people’s minds. Nowadays
people admire those who are ruthless, those who will go to any lengths, and those
who will kill and maim. That’s what people esteem.

Man’s drastic moral decline is unfolding
throughout the world. People’s notions have changed dramatically. Nowadays, what’s
beautiful is not as popular as what’s ugly; what’s good is less welcome than what’s
wicked; what’s clean and tidy is less appealing than what’s sloppy. Consider a
specific example. In the past, for example, professional singers had to be well
trained in vocal technique and musicianship. Whereas now, who takes the stage but
somebody who looks terrible, with long, unkempt hair spilling forth… “Agghhh!” He
yells at the top of his lungs. And then with a little television hype, he becomes a
star. But the sounds he makes are awful. Hideous things have come to be seen as
beautiful owing to the decline of people’s values, and people fanatically chase
after such things. The same holds true for fine art. Dip a cat’s tail in ink and let
it run about, and it’s dubbed a work of art. And then there’s that abstractionist
and impressionist stuff—what is that? It used to be that the more beautiful and
pleasing to the eye a painting was, the more people would enjoy it. So what exactly
is that stuff?? It is the outcome of “artists” seeking to liberate human nature.
Human nature, in the absence of a moral code, amounts to one giant display of demon
nature. Could beautiful things come about when people are in that state? People’s
notions are becoming distorted as we speak.

What were those artists pursuing? They were
talking about the emancipation of human nature—no inhibitions or restraints, and
doing whatever one pleases. Buddhism teaches that, without a moral code, without
moral values to keep man’s mind in check, what people will display is demon nature.
Just take a look at today’s works of art! Ordinary people have no idea what’s behind
those. That stuff is just one giant showing of demon nature.

Take for example the toys sold in stores.
In the past, people would buy pretty dolls. Nowadays, the uglier something is, the
faster it sells. Things with skulls, demons, and even things that resemble feces are
being sold as toys—and the more horrible the appearance, the faster it sells!
Doesn’t this indicate that people’s notions are changing, and changing for the
worse?

When I discuss what has happened with
society, people immediately get it, which indicates that man’s innate nature has not
changed. However, mankind has slid to a terribly dangerous point. When I talked
about homosexuality while giving classes in the West, I said, “These wanton sexual
practices in the West have gotten almost as bad as incest.” Someone then brought up
that “homosexuality is legally protected by the state.” Good and bad are not to be
gauged by the approval of some individual or collective. Human judgment of good and
bad is based entirely on people’s own notions. People think, “I think he’s good…” or
“He’s good to me, so I would say he’s good.” Or he has formed a set notion, and, if
according to his notion someone is good, he will say that person is good. The same
holds true with groups. When something is in the group’s interest or it furthers a
certain goal, the group will say that it’s good and consent to it. But it is not
necessarily truly good. The truth of the universe, the Buddha Fa, is the sole,
unchanging criterion that measures human beings and everything that exists—the sole
criterion that determines what is good or bad. I told them [the students in the
West], “To be perfectly frank, your government may approve of it, but your Lord does
not!” Each time mankind has reached this point, it has in fact been in grave danger
and out of control. Now that it has become what it has, if it goes further, what
will it be like next?! Buddha Shakyamuni said that during the Age of Law’s End a
multitude of demons would reincarnate as human beings and become monks in
monasteries who damage the Fa. Taiwan, in particular, now has many renowned
monks and lay Buddhists who are actually demons. They extol themselves as the
founders of religions, but fail to realize that they are demons. They had laid out
their entire lives before reincarnating and coming here, and they live out their
lives in accordance with the damage that they plotted. The human world is
terrifying. Many of the well-known, supposed “masters” in India are possessed by
giant pythons. Among the qigong masters in China, quite a large number are
possessed by foxes and weasels, though there are snakes as well. The Age of Law’s
End is a time of chaos. The head of Aum Shinrikyo in Japan is the incarnation of a
demon from Hell who came to the human world to foment chaos. Human beings are right
in the middle of all this, and, being here in the human world, they don’t have a
chance to think about such things. They can sense that something is amiss with the
world, but have no idea how bad it is. Once it is spelled out, people are startled.

It was thus not on some mere impulse that I
decided to impart this Fa. And I have encountered various kinds of
interference along the way. When you teach something virtuous, someone else is going
to preach something wicked, and some will masquerade as being virtuous and even
exhort people to do good. But their purpose is not to advance the cause of good.
Rather, they have motives that couldn’t bear the light of day. The qigong
movement started off being good, but has since taken a dark turn. It’s hard to
identify a domain that is pure.

Humanity During the Final Kalpa

Many of the world’s true religions can no
longer save people. This owes to the scriptures of a number of these original, true
religions having been tampered with by later generations; their doctrines were
misconstrued by those who came later, and are now regarded as a field of study. For
example, Buddhism is studied as if it were philosophy, and whatever facets of it
can’t be explained with modern science are explained away as the imaginings of
ancient folk or reflections of backwardness. Monks and priests merely read texts,
but don’t get down to the task of cultivation. The temples and monasteries have
become microcosms of society, with infighting and jockeying for position. Some monks
even capitalize on Buddhism’s woeful state and make a profit from it; their
attachments are so abundant that they don’t even measure up to ordinary people. As
such they can hardly save themselves, let alone others! And then there are some
famous Buddhist monks and Daoist priests who lead people astray by wantonly writing
books interpreting the Buddhist sutras and holy scriptures, working off of
their personal conceptions and their minute knowledge of the sutras. The
words of the great awakened ones have profound meanings within and can convey Buddha
Fa’s guidance at each level and realm that cultivators progress through as they
unceasingly elevate. Any action that alters the great awakened ones’ original words
amounts to an undermining of Fa.

Those explanations, which purportedly help
people understand the sutras and holy scriptures, depart radically from the
true underlying meaning of the Buddha’s words. They are two completely different
things. The tiny bit those authors have grasped is but their own,
barely-higher-than-ordinary understanding, and they know nothing of the underlying
meaning at higher levels, since they have not cultivated to those heights. If they
have not reached the Tathagata level, how could they know the true, higher-plane
meaning of the Tathagata’s words? Their writings serve only to undermine the
Fa, and cannot save people. Books such as these, written for fame and gain,
are leading people who cultivate in Buddhist disciplines into the authors’ frame of
thought. Some go so far as to advocate that religion cater to the dictates of
today’s society, which changes religion’s essence. Buddha Fa is immutable and
incorruptible adamantine Divine Truth. One can well imagine how great are the sins
and karma incurred when people try to adapt Buddha Fa to the ways of immoral man, as
opposed to having man ascend by following Buddha Fa. Those who have written books
wantonly interpreting the Buddhist sutras have gravely interfered with the
True Fa, and in fact have long since been condemned to Hell.

Human beings have done a great deal of
wrong life after life, amassing tremendous amounts of karma. This is a factor that
contributes to their lack of righteous faith. There are some people who did
cultivation in a previous life and didn’t cultivate well and failed at it. They were
unable to shed various attachments, but did accumulate certain blessings. When they
then reincarnate as human beings, they typically have “supernormal” abilities, and
with their celestial eye can see a smattering of things on a low plane in other
dimensions. Then, spurred on by the human pursuit of renown and profit, they start
up this or that religious group. To all appearances they are teaching people to be
good, but nestled deep in their hearts is a longing for renown and profit, and
unspeakable motives. The great awakened ones have their own paradises (heavenly
kingdoms) to which they can deliver people. But where could these figures save
people to? The same holds for false qigong masters. Some of them have wanted
to be a Buddha, and some think that they were a Buddha in a previous life. And then
there are people possessed by animals who shower praise upon these qigong
masters, calling them “such-and-such generation grandmaster,” and so on. These false
qigong masters in turn become so pleased with themselves, but it’s all just
self-deception. All such figures are demons incarnate who have come to wreak havoc
upon the world.

Evil has turned the human world into an
absolute mess. False religions, cults, and a great many reform religions have been
spreading for many centuries, and it’s hard to tell true from false. Though the
tenets of those heretical or shamanic practices are wicked, there are still people
who believe in them and venerate their leaders. Doesn’t this tell us that people’s
values are lost? And why do people engage in those demonic practices? Most such
people seek a means of harming others, they set out to do harm, and they don’t give
thought to what will become of them down the road. The true, original religions can
no longer save people, having entered the Age of Law’s End. Myriads of demons have
descended upon the world, where they undermine the Fa and wreak havoc. Human
beings no longer have inner-law to restrain them, nor do they have moral norms.
Spurred on by hordes of demons, they stop at no evil. Moral values and standards are
sliding downward as fast as could be. Man’s very way of thinking and concepts have
changed. The beautiful is less attractive than the ugly; the virtuous is less
popular than the wicked; good is less desirable than evil; clean-cut is less valued
than unkempt; what’s new is less preferable than what’s used; fragrant is less
favored than foul. Men sport long hair while women cut theirs short—a reflection of
rising yin and receding yang, an inversion of yin and
yang. Works of art are devoid of moral norms and seek to liberate human
nature, making for one giant showing of the demonic. Then there’s the
“impressionist” and “abstractionist” stuff, with its wild smearings, which are
accepted as art by modern people and their perverse notions. Just dump a pile of
garbage somewhere and it becomes the work of a “distinguished” modernist sculptor.
And as for music, you see that “techno” and “rock-and-roll” stuff, with people
climbing onstage in elegant halls and blaring that noise. With a little hype from
radio and television, blind or handicapped singers with hoarse voices and those with
repulsive looks become stars. And with children’s toys, the uglier and more sinister
they look, the faster they sell.

Mankind, in this mental state devoid of
virtuous thoughts, seeks after drastically different things than before. For fame
and gain, people resort to killing, arson, and framing. All that matters to them is
money, not friends or family. Human relationships completely hinge now on money. You
thus see unconscionable and outrageous acts of every sort being committed for money.
Products, promotional items, and sound and video recordings that promote promiscuous
sex are everywhere. For money, people will harm others without hesitation and
produce, traffic, and sell drugs. Those miserable drug addicts will stop at
nothing—stealing, robbing, and cheating others for money—to buy those expensive
drugs. Television programs, newspapers, magazines, and literary works are full of
casual sex. People go so far as to commit incest across generational lines.
Repulsive homosexual behavior meanwhile bespeaks of a filthy, deviant state of mind
that lacks rationality. Organized crime is so rampant there is no place it doesn’t
reach, yet it appeals to young people who, driven by their demonic side, crave
violence. Crime bosses have become the objects of admiration, and people flock to
them.

Many great awakened ones and prophets
previously predicted that mankind would at this time have a massive disaster to
worry about. Today’s mankind is even worse than what the prophets predicted, and
good people are ever fewer. Because of the many wrongs people did over the course of
their many lives, and the enormous karma they thus accrued, people meet with trouble
the moment they step out the door. But they don’t realize that they are now paying
for the wrong they did in their previous lives and eliminating that karma. When
others mistreat them, they don’t show tolerance or forbearance. Rather, they think,
“You wronged me, then I’ll do even worse to you. I won’t fight with people unless
I’m provoked, but when that happens, I’ll be sure get them back, and more.” So they
then accrue new karma before paying off the old, and the karma on their bodies
mounts to a terrifying extent! Human morality is sliding downwards rapidly and is on
the verge of dire peril. Everyone, life after life, has in fact been adding fuel to
the fire of human morality’s great demise. Each time the world has met with
disaster, it has been a time when human moral values had vanished. Such is what
transpires in the period of the final kalpa.

True Cultivation

My truly cultivating disciples, what I have
taught you is a Fa with which one may cultivate Buddhahood or the Dao.
Yet you air grievances with me when things that ordinary people deem important don’t
go your way, rather than being worried about your own inability to let go of human
attachments. Is that cultivation? Letting go of human attachments is a mortal test
on your way to becoming a truly superior being. Every disciple who does true
cultivation must pass it, for it is the dividing line between cultivator and
ordinary person.

The truth is, when you feel pained by
things that hurt your prestige (ming), your worldly interests (li), or
your feelings (qing), that very fact indicates that human attachments haven’t
been let go. Remember my words: Cultivation itself is not painful, rather, the key
problem is your inability to let go of human attachments. It is only when you are
supposed to let go of reputation, self-interest, and feelings that you experience
pain.

You fell here from a world that is holy and
pure, a realm glorious beyond compare, because you developed attachments at that
level. But after falling into a world that is, by comparison, utterly filthy,
instead of hastening your steps as you cultivate back, you hold on to filthy things
in this foul world and refuse to let go, and even agonize over petty losses. Do you
realize that for the sake of your salvation the Buddha once begged for alms among
ordinary people? And today I open this great door and teach the Great Law in order
to save you. I have never regarded the countless ordeals I have gone through as
hardship. So what could you possibly have that can’t be let go? Can you carry those
things that you can’t let go of through the gates of heaven?

Be Clearheaded and Use Good Sense

I once told some students that the presence
of overly drastic thoughts means thought-karma is at work, yet now many students
blame all inadequate thoughts that come up in ordinary circumstances on
thought-karma. That’s not right. If you no longer had any bad thoughts of your own,
what would be left for you to cultivate? If you were that pure, wouldn’t you be a
Buddha? We are dealing with a wrong perception. Only when your mind fiercely
projects filthy thoughts or curses Teacher, Dafa, other people, etc. and you cannot
purge or suppress them is it thought-karma. There is also some thought-karma that is
weak, but it is different from regular thoughts or ideas. You must get this
straight.

Discernment

Muddy and turbid is the human world; fish
eyes are confused with pearls. Quietly, unannounced, must the Tathagata descend to
the world. As he spreads the Fa, meddling by wicked practices is sure to
ensue. Dao and demonic spread in parallel, together inhabiting the earth.
Discernment (wu) is key when true and false are mingled. It takes a superior
being to tell them apart. Indeed, there are predestined ones who will, with their
capacity to discern, come in steady succession, entering the Way and gaining the Fa.
Knowing upright from evil, they will obtain the true scriptures, unburden their
bodies, enrich their wisdom, fill their hearts, and sail smoothly aboard the Vessel
of Fa. How marvelous! Diligent, sparing no effort, straight to Consummation they
progress.

Those who are lost in the world, struggling
to discern, live for money and die for power, finding pleasure or worry in but a
trifling profit; doggedly they vie and fight, creating karma all their lives. Should
such a person hear this Fa he is sure to laugh, with the word “nonsense”
rolling off his tongue; his mind is sure to find it hard to understand or believe.
Such is the inferior man; hard is he to save. So voluminous is his karma that it
encases his body, seals off his wisdom, and renders his original nature no more.

Why One Sees Not

“What is seen can be believed; what is not
seen cannot be believed.” Such is the view of the inferior man. Man is lost in
illusion and creates abundant karma. With his innate nature lost, how could he
possibly see [the invisible]? Discernment comes first, seeing follows. Cultivate the
mind and eliminate karma, and then, once your innate nature emerges, shall you see.
But, seeing or not, the superior man can achieve Consummation by relying on
discernment alone. Among the masses, some see while others do not, this being
determined by one’s level and spiritual potential. Cultivators often do not see on
account of their pursuit of it, which amounts to an attachment; without its removal
they thus cannot see. Often it owes to karma, an unfavorable setting, or is dictated
by the method of cultivation; there are a multitude of reasons, as it all depends on
the individual. Even in the case of someone who can see, there will be that which is
indistinct. And only then, with clouded vision, does the Way remain to be discerned.
If what is seen is as clear as if experienced firsthand, with nothing vague, then
this is someone whose gong is Unlocked. He can cultivate no further, for
there is nothing left to discern.

Studying the Fa

When educated people learn Dafa they should
pay attention to a most prominent problem: studying Dafa in the manner that ordinary
people study political ideology, such as studying by selecting relevant quotations
from eminent persons against which to measure one’s own conduct. This will hinder a
cultivator’s progress. There are also those who, upon hearing that Dafa has
profound, underlying meaning and high-level content that can guide cultivation at
different levels, attempt to delve into each and every word, only to find nothing.
These habits, formed through prolonged study of political doctrine, are a factor
that impacts your cultivation, for they lead you to misconstrue the Fa.

When studying the Fa, you should
avoid searching for parts specifically relevant to some particular matter. That is
in fact an attachment in a different guise (with the exception being urgent problems
that need a solution). The only way to study Dafa well is to study it without any
specific goal. With each complete reading of Zhuan Falun, you have made
progress as long as you have gained insight. Even if you have come to only one new
insight after reading it, you have truly improved.

In cultivation, upward progress is in fact
something gained bit by bit and is unbeknownst to you. Keep in mind: What you gain
should come naturally, free of pursuit.

How to Provide Assistance

In different regions there are many
assistants who have an advanced understanding of Dafa, and they are able to set an
example and run our practice sites well. But then there are some assistants who
haven’t done so well, and this mainly manifests in how they go about their work. If
they, for the purpose of getting things done more easily, run things at practice
sites via giving orders so that students will comply with them, that’s a problem.
Studying the Fa is a voluntary act. If the person studying doesn’t have his
heart in it, then no problem or issue will be resolved, and conflicts will surely
arise. If the approach isn’t changed, it will cause the conflicts to intensify, with
the effect of severely compromising people’s Fa-study.

Worse yet, some assistants often, in order
to make practitioners believe in and obey them, circulate rumors or sensational
things so as to boost their own standing, or try to distinguish themselves with
something out of the norm. None of that is allowed. Our assistants serve others out
of their own initiative, and are not Master. Much less should they have an
attachment such as this.

So how are we to do the assistant’s job
well? First, you should place yourself among the students and not think of yourself
as above them. If there is something you don’t know how to do, then humbly discuss
it together with everyone. And if you mishandle something, then sincerely tell the
students, “I’m a cultivator just like you, and it’s hard to avoid mistakes in doing
this work. I mishandled it. Now let’s do it right.” If you sincerely wish to see
everyone work together to do that thing well, how do you think it will go? Nobody
will say you’re no good. Just the opposite, people will think that you have learned
the Fa well and are magnanimous. Dafa is right here with us, and all of you
are studying it. Each and every action of the assistant, good or bad, will be
measured by students in light of Dafa and seen for what it is. Once you look to
build yourself up, students will think there’s a problem with your xinxing.
Only by being modest can you handle things well. One’s stature is established by
having studied the Fa well. Could a cultivator possibly be without fault?

What is “Emptiness”?

What is “emptiness” (kong)? The
absence of any attachment is true emptiness, not emptiness in a material sense. But
then there is Zen Buddhism, whose Dharma has expired and which has nothing left to
transmit. In this final age, when the Fa is in disarray, it still has
students who cling obstinately to its doctrine of emptiness, acting demented and
irrational, as if they have grasped the very root of philosophical truth. Yet its
founding patriarch, Boddhidharma, himself once proclaimed it to be a Dharma of only
six generations, after which there would remain nothing left to transmit. Why is
this not understood? If it’s said that all is empty, no Fa exists, there is
no Buddha, no appearance, no self, and nothing exists, then what was Boddhidharma?
If there is no Fa, then what is Zen’s doctrine of emptiness? If there is no
Buddha and no appearance, then who was Shakyamuni? If you have no name, no
appearance, no self, no existence, and all is “emptiness,” then for what reason do
you eat and drink? Why wear clothes? Would it be all the same if your eyes were
gouged out? And yet look at how attached you are to human emotions and desires. When
a Tathagata speaks of “emptiness,” it refers to the total absence of human
attachments; being “free of defilement” is the true meaning of “emptiness.” The
cosmos is inherently material in its existence, its formation, and its continuation.
How could it be “empty”? A Fa imparted by anything less than a Tathagata is
condemned to a short life, its teachings sure to vanish. The Fa of an Arhat
is not Buddha Fa. Realize this! Realize this!

Be Steadfast

You are full of confidence when Master is
present. When Master is not present, you have no interest in cultivation, as if you
cultivate for Master and took it up on a whim. Such is a major flaw of the average
man. Shakyamuni, Jesus, Lao Zi, and Confucius have been gone for over two thousand
years, yet never have their disciples felt they could not cultivate in their
master’s absence. Cultivation is something that falls upon you yourself, and nobody
can do it on your behalf. A master can only, at least on the surface, tell you the
Fa’s principles. It is incumbent upon you to cultivate your mind and sever
the cords of desire, gaining the illumination of wisdom and removing all doubt. If
you took up this path on an impulse, your heart is sure to be less than steadfast
and you will surely lose your grounding when you venture out into the secular world.
If you cannot hold firmly to your faith, you will end up with nothing after a whole
lifetime. Who knows when another destined chance will come. They are hard to come
by!

Buddhism’s Teachings Are the Smallest and Weakest Part of Buddha Fa

Sentient beings! Don’t use Buddhism to
measure the Great Fa of Zhen Shan Ren, for that simply can’t be done. That’s
done only because people are used to calling the sutras of Buddhism
“Fa.” The cosmic body is in fact so vast as to exceed a Buddha’s knowledge of
the universe. The Daoist Taiji theory is likewise but an understanding of the
universe at a lesser level and, on the plane of ordinary man, no longer constitutes
a real Fa; rather, it encompasses merely a few, limited phenomena from the
periphery of the universe with which people can cultivate. Since ordinary people are
the lowest plane of man, they are not allowed to know the true Buddha Fa. But people
have heard that sages have said: “Paying respects to Buddha can sow the karmic seeds
of the opportunity to cultivate,” “The chanting of incantations by cultivators can
invoke the protection of higher beings,” “Observing the monastic rules can allow you
to reach the standard required of a cultivator.” Throughout history, people have
always looked into and debated whether the Awakened One’s words inherently amount to
Buddha Fa. What a Tathagata says is an embodiment of Buddha-nature, and it can be
called an expression of Fa. But it is not the universe’s true Fa, for,
in the past, people were strictly prohibited from knowing the true embodiment of
Buddha Fa. What Buddha Fa is, was something that could be discerned only after
cultivating to a higher plane; thus, even less was it the case that human beings
were allowed to know the essence of cultivation. Falun Dafa has, for the first time
in all the ages, revealed the special property of the universe—Buddha Fa—to human
beings. It is equal to bestowing upon man a ladder to heaven. Seen in this light,
how could you evaluate the Great Fa of the universe with things from Buddhism’s
past?

What is “Wisdom”?

People think so highly of human society’s
celebrities, scholars, and various experts. In reality, they are terribly
insignificant, for they are ordinary people. Their knowledge is but the small,
trivial content that the modern science of human society has come to know, and that
is all. In the immense universe, looking from the most macroscopic level to the most
microscopic, human society is precisely situated most centrally, at the outermost
layer, and at the very surface. And the lives there are the lowest form of
existence, so their knowledge of the material and spiritual is sparse, shallow, and
pitiable. Even were someone to master all of mankind’s knowledge, he would still be
an ordinary person.

Waiting Until Retirement to Cultivate

There is a certain percentage of students
who are endowed with a good spiritual potential that attended my lectures and yet,
because they are busy with their jobs, have stopped practicing. What a pity! If they
were average, ordinary people, I would say nothing more and leave it at that. But
these are people with promise. Human morality is plummeting with each passing day,
and ordinary people are drifting along with the tide. To return through cultivation
becomes for them, as they depart ever further from the Dao, increasingly
difficult. Cultivation is in fact a matter of cultivating the mind, and the
complicated setting of the workplace, in particular, provides exactly a good
opportunity to elevate your xinxing. Once you retire, won’t you have lost the
ideal setting in which to cultivate? With not a hint of discord in sight, what will
there be for you to cultivate with? How will you improve? A human life is only so
long, so while you might often have nice plans, do you really know whether there
will be sufficient time left in the future [for you to cultivate]? Cultivation is no
trifling matter, but rather, more serious than anything in the human world; it can’t
be taken for granted. Once you miss the opportunity, who’s to say when you will gain
a human body again in the cycle of reincarnation. Fate transpires but once. Once the
dreamlike illusion you cling to is over, you will realize what you have lost.