Suggested Reading:

The Wharton Business Plan Competition, for example, awards $20,000 in cash and $10,000 in legal services to its top entrant. Harvard
Business School’s traditional track competition awards $25,000 in cash and $25,000 in business services to its winner.
M.I.T.’s Clean Energy Prize includes $200,000 in cash. And Rice University offers a whopping $225,000 prize to its first-place winner, including $125,000 in equity investment, $20,000 in cash and more than $80,000 in services.

Still, it’s really not about the money, says Cliff Holekamp, a senior lecturer in entrepreneurship at Washington University’s Olin Business School, which hosts multiple competitions, including the recently introduced Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation Competition,
a do-good variation with a $150,000 prize pool. “The value of participation,” says Mr. Holekamp, “is not found in funding but in a process that brings you mentorship, support, structure and access to
the resources and people that will help perfect your business model.”

As impressive as the cash awards sound, Saad Khan, who has served as a competition judge and is an investor with CMEA Capital in Mountain View, Calif., says the amounts are “fairly small in the context of starting a
business.” A better reason to compete, he says, is “to get feedback in real time and to get noticed by alumni who have done well, local VCs and other investors in that community.”

There are even worthy competitions that offer no prize money. In 2006, for example, Ryan MacCauley won the Launch Award at the University of North Carolina’s
Kenan-Flagler Business School with a plan for the Class Watch, a company he now runs with his brothers John and Kevin. “What wasn’t
going to help us quit our day jobs and launch was a $20,000 check,” says Mr. MacCauley, “but winning gave us confidence.”

It also helped them secure a deal with an angel investor. The Class Watch, which sells customizable, college commemorative timepieces, began generating revenue in the second quarter of 2008 and hopes to hit $3 million in sales
within a year.

Pick the Right Competition

Since their advent in 1984, when the University of Texas at Austin held its first “Moot Corp,” business plan competitions have
proliferated within academia and beyond. More than 50 American colleges and universities host them. So do corporations, nonprofits and government economic development offices.

Some remain invitational but most have loosened their eligibility terms to foster interdisciplinary, international and intercollegiate collaboration (in other words, you don’t have to attend most business schools to
enter their competitions).

Competition within the competitions can be fierce, however. And that’s why Cindy Boyd, who is chief executive of the Houston-based consultancy Sentigy and a frequent judge at competitions hosted by Rice University and
the Entrepreneurs’ Organization, recommends that would-be entrants conduct extensive online research via the Web sites
of the host organizations. Even more important, she suggests contacting past participants — judges, winners, and losers — to ask what worked and what didn’t.

After selecting an appropriate competition, George Abe, a faculty director at U.C.L.A.’s Anderson School, says most teams should take at least a year to hone their business plans. “The earlier the prep begins,”
says Mr. Abe, who has seven years of judging experience, “the better the plan is. You can get away with three months minimum if you have a product or service crystal clear in your mind. But you cannot be figuring
out a market and competitive story in 60 days.”

Business plan competitions require an initial submission, sometimes called the “intent to compete” entry. Normally, it consists of a two-to-three-page executive summary explaining all elements of the business:
product, market, competition, finances and operations. If it isn’t well written and succinct, a team won’t make it through the door.

“Students spend too much time describing the hammer and not enough time talking about the nails,” Mr. Abe says. “They have to be able to explain their product or service quickly so a judge not knowledgeable
in the field can basically get it. What every judge knows is how to question students about markets, competition and finances. Those are the nails.” The bottom line: you need more than a cool idea; you have to show
how the idea will make money.

Judges are often impressed by serious market research: the results of customer surveys, for example, or of pilot sales programs. That may have been what gave a team from the London Business School the edge in Columbia Business
School’s first Odyssey competition this year.

The team’s plan, says a team spokesman, Vivek Makhija, was for “a renewable energy company using a combination of original and licensed technology to offer power generation at a micro level to households in India.”
As yet unnamed, the company worked with an alumni mentor who is deeply involved in market research to develop comprehensive reports on rural Indian consumers’ access to and use of electricity.

Make Sure Your Teammates Know Their Roles

NIR Diagnostics wanted to commercialize technology that can prevent amputations and fatalities caused by chronic wounds. These sores may appear to be healing on the surface even though they’re actually deteriorating
and infected underneath.

Clearly defined roles were essential, according to the team leader, Armen Karamanian, the interim chief executive. “We came together around common goals and complimentary skill sets,” Mr. Karamanian says. “We
didn’t want to wind up with a great, life-saving idea — and lawsuits over this, that or money.” Have an honest discussion over what your team wants to accomplish beyond the academic exercise, such as
how you want to start the business and who will do what, he suggests.

NIR Diagnostics won the 2009 Wharton Business Plan Competition and believes it can miniaturize, manufacture and sell by 2012 a device (based on technology created at Drexel University) that bounces lasers through layers of
a chronic wound to give doctors a more complete reading of its healing progress.

The company, recently renamed Lumina Diagnostics, is now seeking a $15 million investment over several years to gain F.D.A. approvals and refine its technology..