Responses of amphisbaenians (Blanus cinereus) lo deionized waler, a control for pungency (cologne), and integumental prey odors (coleopteran larvae and adult ants) on cotton swabs were studied in experiments with a randomized blocks design to discover whether amphisbaenians use chemical cues to detect and identify prey. No individual bit the applicators. Amphisbaenians tongue-flicked at lower rates than epigean saurians, which are active foragers. Tongue-flick rate differed among treatments, but responses to prey odors were not significantly different from those to cologne. The number of directed tongue-flicks emitted during the 6O-sec trials was, however, lower in response to deionized water than in response to cologne or prey odors. Response details, the low rate of tongue-flick, and absence of biting are discussed in relation to Ihe foraging behavior and fossoriality of amphisbaenians. Evidence from this study indicates that the vomeronasal sense is used by amphisbaenians to identify odors, but our experiments failed to demonstrate that amphisbaenians discriminate between prey and nonprey odors.