The union behind the slowdown at the port breaks its silence.

Leal Sundet says it’s bad enough that the International
Longshoreman and Warehouse Union is getting a raw deal at the Port of
Portland. He thinks also it’s getting a bum rap.

For more than a
month, a labor dispute has clogged cargo at the port. The ILWU Local 8
has been accused of intentionally slowing work at Terminal 6, the port’s
only international container-ship terminal—all in a dispute over two
jobs.

The jobs involve
plugging and unplugging refrigerated containers, called reefers. The
jobs went to the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, which
has a contract with the port. But the longshoremen say their contract
with thecompany leasing the terminal, ICTSI of Oregon, gives them the right to those jobs.

A
U.S. district judge issued a restraining order July 3 against the
union’s slowdown. Meanwhile, ships have diverted cargo to other ports,
costing the region millions.

The port has set the
media agenda, in part because the ILWU is notoriously press-averse. But
the union has decided to tell its side. And it’s chosen Sundet—a burly
Norwegian who worked the Portland docks from 1991 until elected a coast
committeeman in 2006—to tell its story.

WW: Tell me why this isn’t just about two jobs.

Leal Sundet: I don’t think there’s any gained jobs for us
or a loss of jobs for the IBEW. You have one rogue employer, is what it
amounts to. One rogue employer that wants a special deal for itself.

What are the jobs like? These reefers are big.

They are the same size as a 40-foot truck.

So this is skilled labor?

The repairing of the reefer is highly skilled, and
longshoremen repair all the reefers on the dock. It’s like a big
refrigerator, and typically it’s high-valued cargo that’s sensitive to
temperature. Actually plugging the cord in doesn’t take a lot of skill.
It’s no different than plugging a cord into a house socket.

What’s usually in the reefers?

It could be frozen meat; it could be vegetables; in some
cases it could be electronic parts that have to be kept at a certain
temperature. Medications. If it goes bad and it spoils, it’s very
expensive to the customer, and then everybody points fingers.

So these particular two jobs are not necessarily the most valued jobs in the world.

It’s the principle of the thing. It’s the principle of
whether or not one of our companies can pick or choose what part of the
contract we have with them they are going to comply with. That’s it.
It’s unfairly reported as this fight between two unions for two jobs.
That’s not what the issue is.

So how are things on the terminal? It’s got to be getting stressful out there at this point.

Not a lot of work. Not too stressful. There’s very little cargo, if any, on the docks.

We don’t have a
problem with the electricians at all. That’s being improperly reported, I
think, in the paper. I think the electricians understand what our
position is.

Why are the ships going elsewhere?

The carriers don’t want to violate [our contract].
Remember: It’s their equipment. From a carrier’s perspective, ICTSI is
their subcontractor. So if you tell your subcontractor, “I want you to
do something with my stuff a certain way,” and a subcontractor says no,
what are you gonna do?

Obviously, it impacts Portland financially. The people of Portland can’t be very happy.

Well, they might not be. So they should be upset with ICTSI.

Not with you?

There’s nothing that we did. We got an agreement to assign
the work, and they refused to assign it. They say they won’t because of
the lease with the port—and the port has a contract with IBEW.

Sounds like a lousy lease.

The judge described it as selling the same rock to two different people. There’s only one rock.

"In the low usage areas, we found that our vehicles sit idle four times longer, ultimately affecting overall vehicle availability for the Portland membership base, as well as parking for the Portland community."

News
East Portland can't catch a break.Just this week KGW had a story called, "Diverse, non-cool East Por... More