Insect Trust saidThe classification of Mideasterners, Indians, Central Asians, Iranians, etc. as Caucasian is simply because of their morphological and genetic similarity to Europeans! They are all EURASIANS!!!Perhaps you're never around Indians, but I am. I know many who are quite dark but if you changed their color they'd easily pass as Europeans, due to their facial features and hair.Color is a trivial trait, quickly changed by adaptation to environment.Africa S of the Sahara is a genetic region, where Y-DNA E predominates. E is present elsewhere (Maghreb, Mideast, Iran, Europe) but not as the majority type.Also mtDNA L is subsaharan. In the Maghreb, Mideast, Iran, Europe, etc., Eurasian mtDNA predominatesKiloEcho repliesIt has nothing to do with morphological and genetic similarity to Europeans.It has everything to with the one drop rule in the reverse mode in regions where aboriginal black skinned populations were erased and replaced with their mixed offspring with invading white skinned populations or worse their mixed offspring with White females slaves.The reverse application of the one drop rule is a lame attempt to- lay false claim to their glorious history and brilliant civilizations Whites had no part in;- cover-up thousands of years of white slavery before the Whites overthrew their former rulers or masters.The Romans started out as being slaves to the Etruscans they eventually became their masters and rulers. It is an old trick that Whites also used in Egypt when the slave soldiers of Slavic origin, Janissaries revolted and became rulers of Egypt.The French were enslaved by the thousands in Algeria during the golden years of the Algerine pirates, they eventually became a colonial power in Algeria for 130 years.Men are willing to be slaves in one place if they can only lord it in another." Jean de La Bruyère ----------Arabs have a large number of lookalikes among the Colored of South Africa, the Creole of the America. Yet, Arabs are Caucasians but the Colored and Creole are not.Why the double standards?I have biracial (black and white) friends who have been mistaken for Arabs or even Indians.There must be a reason.Why all these biracial people are not considered Caucasian just like Arabs, Indians, Berbers and Egyptians?----------You are lying about the minor presence of the E hg in North Africa.Egyptians and Berbers carry E hg, either e1b1b like the Berber marker or e1b1a found in Pharaoh Ramessess III.

REAL Arabs carry Haplogroup J1. The Etruscans were INDIGENOUS EUROPEANS! Berbers are a mix of Iberian.Middle Eastern and African origin for 10 000 years! Egyptians are closely related to BERBERS who havent been black for 10 000 years!en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berber_people

Repeating the same lies over and over again will not make the truth go away

J people are not aboriginal to the Arabian Peninsula. Their homeland is located in Anatolia.

Why can't you get it?

Just a quick look at average temperatures (35-45 degree Celsius) in the Arabian Land and you will understand that the earliest inhabitants could ONLY be black skinned not white skinned

J people invaded the Arabian Peninsula and bred out the aboriginal inhabitants. They are invading settlers and history fraudsters.

I am not surprised at all when ancient Turks and older generations of Tturks still call black people, Arab. Traditional accounts of black skinned Arabs, the REAL ARABS, were passed down from generation to generation.

Aboriginal populations of the Arabian Peninsula were black skinned people of either the Ethiopoid type (The Hujeris in Yemen) or the Veddoid type (isolated and marginalized communities, the tribes of Mahra-Land)

The high YSTR variance of J1e in Turks and Syrians (Table 1,Figure 1e) supports the inference of an ORIGIN of J1e in nearby eastern Anatolia.----------Indo-European is one of the many words the so called Whites use to hide their true origins and homeland.

The homeland of the Whites is south Central Asia, somewhere in Northern PakistanAfghanistan where their lost brothers, the Nuristani, sill live as cavedwellers.

The Whites invaded India and Europe in a very remote period of history and claimed the identity of the original inhabitants who were not White but looked like Dravidians or Ethiopians.

The e1b1b, which originates in the Horn of Africa hg is found among Europeans at various levels with a record high 43% in Southern Greece.

White skin is a genetic mutation from brown skin. The Whites' distant ancestors were brown skinned before this genetic muration.

White people came into existence following a genetic mutation from brown skin to white skin (the gene, SLC24A5).

Your ancestors were BROWN-SKINNED for tens of thousands of yearsa suggestion made 30 years ago by Stanford University geneticist L. Luca Cavalli-Sforza----------The Etruscans were, in fact, indigenous Europeans. They were not White at all.

They are a few Whites who are honest enough to admit that Etruscans were not White neither were the Minoans who preceded the Greeks.

The sad thing is the more honest Whites are either self-proclaimed Nordicists or falsely accused of being Afrocentrists.

African AE saidREAL Arabs carry Haplogroup J1.The Etruscans were INDIGENOUS EUROPEANS!Berbers are a mix of Iberian.Middle Eastern and African origin for 10 000 years!Egyptians are closely related to BERBERS who havent been black for 10 000 years!en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berber_peopleKiloEcho repliesRepeating the same lies over and over again will not make the truth go awayJ people are not aboriginal to the Arabian Peninsula. Their homeland is located in Anatolia.Why can't you get it?Just a quick look at average temperatures (35-45 degree Celsius) in the Arabian Land and you will understand that the earliest inhabitants could ONLY be black skinned not white skinnedJ people invaded the Arabian Peninsula and bred out the aboriginal inhabitants. They are invading settlers and history fraudsters.I am not surprised at all when ancient Turks and older generations of Tturks still call black people, Arab. Traditional accounts of black skinned Arabs, the REAL ARABS, were passed down from generation to generation.Aboriginal populations of the Arabian Peninsula were black skinned people of either the Ethiopoid type (The Hujeris in Yemen) or the Veddoid type (isolated and marginalized communities, the tribes of Mahra-Land)http://www.eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_J1_Y...http://www.dnaancestry.ae/Y-DNA-Haplogroup-J_...https://www.academia.edu/2762063/The_emergenc...The high YSTR variance of J1e in Turks and Syrians (Table 1,Figure 1e) supports the inference of an ORIGIN of J1e in nearby eastern Anatolia.----------Indo-European is one of the many words the so called Whites use to hide their true origins and homeland.The homeland of the Whites is south Central Asia, somewhere in Northern PakistanAfghanistan where their lost brothers, the Nuristani, sill live as cavedwellers.The Whites invaded India and Europe in a very remote period of history and claimed the identity of the original inhabitants who were not White but looked like Dravidians or Ethiopians.The e1b1b, which originates in the Horn of Africa hg is found among Europeans at various levels with a record high 43% in Southern Greece.White skin is a genetic mutation from brown skin. The Whites' distant ancestors were brown skinned before this genetic muration.White people came into existence following a genetic mutation from brown skin to white skin (the gene, SLC24A5).Your ancestors were BROWN-SKINNED for tens of thousands of yearsa suggestion made 30 years ago by Stanford University geneticist L. Luca Cavalli-Sforza----------The Etruscans were, in fact, indigenous Europeans. They were not White at all.They are a few Whites who are honest enough to admit that Etruscans were not White neither were the Minoans who preceded the Greeks.The sad thing is the more honest Whites are either self-proclaimed Nordicists or falsely accused of being Afrocentrists.Here are depictions of Etruscans and Minoans.www.maravot.com/Etruscan_mural_francois6.gifhttp://www.geraldbrimacombe.com/France/Greece...

Europeans got their WHITE SKIN from the Middle Eastern Neolithic Farmers 8000-4000 years ago. So how the f--k were Middle Eastern people black?????

<quoted text>Yes, that's right you IDIOT. For Tens of Thousands of YEARS the Ancestors have SURVIVED the SAHARA & WESTERN ASIAN DESERTS, via their INTELLECT. They've adapted to the environment as it has changed throughout time...you Asinine Imbecilic serpent serpent!!!Literally Millions of people live in cities and towns located in the Sahara.1. OASIS still exist till this very moment!!!http://www.sahara-desert.net/desert-hot-sprin...2. NATURAL SPRINGS!!!3. ARTISIAN WELLS!!!4. UNDERGROUND RIVERS!!!http://www.sahara-desert.net/info-on-oasis.ht...5. How do you think Nomadic Herders water their Cattle (Live Stock) & other Animals. Irrigate (Quench) their own bodies thirst/need for H2O???6. WHOEVER SAID THAT TREKING ACROSS THE SAHARA WAS EASY DURING ITS DRY SPELLS serpent boy???YOU AINT SMART AT ALL boy!!! ITS TIME YOU WENT BACK TO SCHOOL NITWIT.

You're one stupid turd, boy.

Nobody lived in the desert Sahara in Upper Palaeolithic times. You still think that back then people had camel, apparently. They did not, jackass.

WHY then was there so little migration out of Africa or into the Maghreb for so long? If they could, why didn't they?

LOL at Afronazi explanations... ALWAYS ignoring evidence, and full of lots of lies.No, the western Eurasian "caucasoids" are not Africans diluted by "whites", they are EURASIANS.The problem with your Afronazi thinking is that you think color is the most important factor in defining a people. That is because of the large white supremacist dick up your collective ass.The Etruscans: Eurasians.Dravidians: EurasiansMideastern Semites: EurasiansAmazigh: EurasiansAfronazis: deluded self-hating fools bent and twisted by racism.

CT M168/PF1416 (THIS PARTiCULAR GENETIC MARKER/MUTATION DEFINES AFRICA, AFRICANS & ALL PEOPLES OUTSIDE THE AFRICAN CONTINENT BARRING (EXCLUDING) KHOISAN AND PYGMIES THEY ARE THE OLDEST OF THE HUMAN POPULATION LIVING TODAY)!!!

Given the proposed origin of Maghreb ancestors56, 57, 58, 59 in North Africa, our network dating suggested a divergence of North Western African populations from Eastern African as early as 32&#8201;000 YBP, which is close to the estimated dates to the origin of E-P2 macrohaplogroup.30, 60 It can be further inferred that the high frequency of E-M81 in North Africa and its association to the Berber-speaking populations25, 30, 32, 60, 61 may have occurred after the splitting of that early group, leading to local differentiation and flow of some markers as far as Southern Europe.

<quoted text>You're one stupid turd, boy.Nobody lived in the desert Sahara in Upper Palaeolithic times. You still think that back then people had camel, apparently. They did not, jackass.WHY then was there so little migration out of Africa or into the Maghreb for so long? If they could, why didn't they?Moron.And why in the Maghreb from that period do we find only Eurasian DNA?ANSWER THAT or shut the F up, boy.

Nut job the subclades of "EP2" ARE WELL REPRESENTED.Given the proposed origin of Maghreb ancestors56, 57, 58, 59 in North Africa, our network dating suggested a divergence of North Western African populations from Eastern African as early as 32&#8201;000 YBP, which is close to the estimated dates to the origin of E-P2 macrohaplogroup.30, 60 It can be further inferred that the high frequency of E-M81 in North Africa and its association to the Berber-speaking populations25, 30, 32, 60, 61 may have occurred after the splitting of that early group, leading to local differentiation and flow of some markers as far as Southern Europe.http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/vaop/ncurr...<quoted text>

BERBERS are a mix of Middle Eastern, Iberian and African DNA going back 10 000 years ago. Seeing EGYPTIANS are closely related to Berbers, how they hell were they black Africans????en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berber_people

2. The "PN2 CLADE (PLUS 'CT-M168')," DEFIES you paid racist concept of race!!! And the Fact that we have the evidence (THAT IS ALWAYS BLOCKED HERE) WHOM THE ORIGINATORS OF KEMET (EGYPT) WERE FROM THE BEGINING (MINIMUM DATING BACK 30-35,000 YBP)!!!

3. You paid clowns are the inventors of the race BS, SO RACISM IS COMPLETELY AND AS A WHOLE YOURS OWNED, ONLY!!!

4. A little more than 1,400 years ago (632 A.D.) Arabs invaded Kemet (Egypt) and North Africa. This is a Recorded FACT of history. Four years prior in 628 A.D. they SACKED JERUSALEM. Another FACT of Recorded history!!!

5. This all proves beyond any doubt who was where when. All of tge self inventions of trolls in alternate media sources, which are "ALTERED," by racist with a racist agenda (trolls in AA THREADS), IS TOTSLLY AND COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE...PERIOD!!!!!!!!! !

1. I don't know how many times you paid things have bloked/deleted my info, proving Kemet (EGYPT), Bardarian & SW ASIA Culture is AFRICAN IN ORIGIN (WSINGER et al)!!!2. The "PN2 CLADE (PLUS 'CT-M168')," DEFIES you paid racist concept of race!!! And the Fact that we have the evidence (THAT IS ALWAYS BLOCKED HERE) WHOM THE ORIGINATORS OF KEMET (EGYPT) WERE FROM THE BEGINING (MINIMUM DATING BACK 30-35,000 YBP)!!!3. You paid clowns are the inventors of the race BS, SO RACISM IS COMPLETELY AND AS A WHOLE YOURS OWNED, ONLY!!!4. A little more than 1,400 years ago (632 A.D.) Arabs invaded Kemet (Egypt) and North Africa. This is a Recorded FACT of history. Four years prior in 628 A.D. they SACKED JERUSALEM. Another FACT of Recorded history!!!5. This all proves beyond any doubt who was where when. All of tge self inventions of trolls in alternate media sources, which are "ALTERED," by racist with a racist agenda (trolls in AA THREADS), IS TOTSLLY AND COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE...PERIOD!!!!!!!!! !

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.