Tuesday, 18 November 2014

EFF MPs embody local-level ANC culture

THERE’s an African idiom
that warns that if you let your child be a menace to the community, one day
that same child will chase you around the house with your own sjambok. The
idiom warns of the stark humiliation awaiting elders who leave the disciplining
of their young so late that they develop incorrigible tendencies. One could
argue that ever since his expulsion in 2012, Julius Malema has been chasing the
African National Congress (ANC) all about the village with its own sjambok.

Last week’s tactical
chaos by the opposition in Parliament was a thrashing for the great liberation
movement that happened only because Malema’s Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF)
has adopted a no retreat, no surrender approach in their politics. The ANC has seemed
stunned and surprised by this abrasive and confrontational contestation that
has been played out in Parliament since the EFF asked President Jacob Zuma to
#paybackthemoney.

Leaving aside the EFF as
a political entity, let’s just focus on Malema and his "street-style"
politics. What is it that Malema brings to the EFF that is so different from
what happens daily in ANC branch meetings and provincial structures?

The ANC cannot be
surprised by Malema’s style of politics because it has become the norm in its
own grassroots and provincial structures, where the battle for power and access
to state resources is at its most brutal. Political assassinations within the
ANC have no need to target national or high-ranking leaders as political
fiefdoms are built in the lower ranks.

This is because the real
spoils of government are not at the top but at the bottom. That is to say, for
those who want in on political opportunity, it is better to fight it out at the
branch and provincial level because you are closer to your allies and much
better able to outplay your opponents on the local terrain that is closer to
your community, where your relationships are.

If you are, for
argument’s sake, a new generation aspirant career politician, or perhaps a
brazen tenderpreneurial politician, it makes sense to expend energy building up
political alliances in councils, metros and provinces where one’s local branch
credentials carry some weight. If you are not a struggle veteran whose
reputation can get you deployed, you need to build up political capital and
weight by other means.

It makes sense to fight
it out at the branch level and that way secure influence over who gets into
state administration. From there on, your political stature can determine who
gets to do what business with the state and who gets employed by the
municipality. Because the local and provincial government spheres have a fair
bit of autonomy in budgetary administration and policy implementation, people
can build their political fiefdoms at the local levels without ever really
giving much concern about who runs national politics.

It makes sense then that
Malema, while he was in the ANC Youth League, built up his power base in
Limpopo and then strategically stayed out of Parliament while reportedly having
a great deal of influence in how government business was conducted. All local
ANC branches have these types of Machiavellian opportunists in them. What they
cleverly figured out is that the power is not in the high ranks of national
politics but in the locally rooted bruising power struggles of the branch.

The branch-level,
bottom-up contestation ought to, of course, result in a robust democratic
culture within the ANC. However, as has been apparent for a long time, the
older ANC leadership is losing control over these brutal local contestations.
The kind of leader that is emerging from this has learnt that hard and vulgar
politicking is the way to go, just as Malema did. It is at this level that SA’s
post-struggle political culture is being fashioned. What the EFF has brought
into Parliament is what its members see in their own communities when ANC
members fight things out.

With all of this in mind,
the older generation of ANC leaders needs to look to the 2016 and 2019
elections with a great deal of trepidation.

Frantz Fanon

1925 - 1961

This Blog

This blog contains resources directly related to Frantz Fanon's life and work, the secondary literature on Fanon and other resources useful for engaging Fanon's ideas here and now. Some of what is here comes from, or relates to, a particular set of ongoing discussions around Fanon's work in Grahamstown.