Leanne (she does not want her last name released but we are sure Twitter will do its research) reportedly crossed a barrier at an Arizona zoo to get a selfie with a jaguar. Thankfully, she only suffered lacerations on her arm but she is now speaking out and pointing fingers at the zoo, according to the Daily Mail.

“The black jaguar was up against the fence and we happened to be walking by and we said, ‘Hey let’s get some good pictures,’” Leanne explained.

She continued, “I was in the wrong for leaning over the barrier, but I do think that maybe the zoo should look into moving their fence back. Anybody can reach out. I’m not the first, and if they don’t move the fence, I’m probably not going to be the last.”

If anyone decided to lean over a barrier of a wild animal there is no one to blame.

There is a 3-foot barrier, which is more than enough space to know not to be an idiot. That said, CBS also reported, “the same thing happened at this same enclosure with the same jaguar just last summer. Jeff Allan received several stitches, and said the zoo put its barrier too close.”

Zoo director Mickey Olson said in a statement to CBS, “When people do not respect the barriers, there’s always a chance that there might be a problem.” Directly after the incident, he said, “There’s no way to fix people crossing barriers. That happens occasionally. We put substantial barriers there, and if people cross them, they can get in trouble.”

Watch the interview below:

"I was in the wrong for leaning over the barrier," the woman clawed by a jaguar in Arizona this past weekend acknowledged to CBS News in an exclusive interview, while also stating that the Wildlife World Zoo should "look into moving their fence back."@errolbarnett reports pic.twitter.com/KMKArWlVh0

The jaguar has been temporarily removed from the exhibit. There were fears that the jaguar would be euthanized due to the incident, but the zoo released the following statement, “We can promise you nothing will happen to our jaguar. She’s a wild animal and there were proper barriers in place to keep our guests safe- not a wild animals fault when barriers are crossed. Still sending prayers to her and her family.”

We can promise you nothing will happen to our jaguar. She’s a wild animal and there were proper barriers in place to keep our guests safe- not a wild animals fault when barriers are crossed. Still sending prayers to her and her family.

3.

R. Kelly’s attorney ALLEGEDLY claims R. Kelly is broke and he doesn’t have $100,000 in the bank for his bail. My questions is:🗣If R. Kelly is broke, then how will he pay his attorney? HIS ATTORNEY IS STRAIGHT UP LYING!💯

4.

5.

R. Kelly is trying to come up w/ 100k to bond out of jail as said by his attorney. He is broke and lost everything. Where did all of that money go? Did he payoff too many women and parents? I’m just asking!

8.

9.

Bullshi* R.Kelly can't afford a bail of$100,000 out of a 1million. W great hits of music&fans. Kelly is playing a #game.When z victims sue, then he can claims #Broke.#RKelly can get a real lawyer but no baill$. It would have been more convincing if he had a public defender. BBW

10.

11.

This is why R. Kelly is finally going to face justice, he's broke, he can't pay for silence anymore. While he should go down for what he did, I hope all those people who took hush money over the years also get exposed. They're just as sick as he is. https://t.co/2ee1L5zppa

12.

Continue reading Twitter Reacts To R. Kelly Being Too Broke To Bail Himself Out Of Jail

Twitter Reacts To R. Kelly Being Too Broke To Bail Himself Out Of Jail

There was little—if any—sympathy on social media for R&B singer R. Kelly who is reportedly too broke to bail himself out of jail after being charged with aggravated criminal sexual abuse.
SEE ALSO: R. Kelly Charged With Aggravated Criminal Sexual Abuse
The disgraced entertainer, whose real name is Robert Kelly, woke up Sunday morning in Illinois’ Cook County jail unable to scrape together $100,000, or 10 percent of his $1 million bond, USA Today reported.
"This is someone who should be wealthy," Kelly’s attorney Steve Greenberg said Saturday, pointing to bad contracts and mismanagement of money as part of the reasons that Kelly’s pockets are empty.
Prosecutors charged Kelly, 52, on Friday with 10 counts of criminal sexual abuse involving at least three underage victims between 1998 and 2010, with each count carrying a maximum of seven years behind bars.
On Saturday, Cook County Judge John Fitzgerald Lyke Jr. called the allegations against Kelly "disturbing" and said the bond amount equals $250,000 for each of the four people Kelly is charged with sexually abusing.
Kelly is scheduled on Monday for a hearing at which a judge will be assigned to his case and he can enter a plea.
https://twitter.com/newsone/status/1099313399744339973
Kelly does not have the career he had more than a decade ago when he faced child pornography charges and was acquitted.
His last song to chart on the Billboard Hot 100 was “PYD” with Justin Bieber in 2013. The fallen star was reportedly being evicted in January from the infamous Chicago recording studio that was at the center of his child porn trial, bringing attention to the state of his finances.
The Chicago Sun-Times reported that a “county judge ordered Kelly evicted from the building. Midwest Commercial Funding sued Kelly last summer, alleging he owed the company nearly $80,000 in back rent. The judge ruled in Midwest Commercial Funding’s favor, court records show, and awarded the company $166,981 while also issuing an ‘order of possession’ for Midwest Commercial Funding.”
Attorney Michael Avenatti recently gave a video to Cook County prosecutors, which could be where Friday’s charges stemmed from. The lawyer said in a statement that he was hired last April in connection to multiple allegations of Kelly sexually assaulting minors. He claimed to have a 45-minute VHS tape as evidence, which, despite its similarities, was not the same video that got Kelly indicted in 2002 — and acquitted in 2008 — for child porn.
Here are some reactions to the news that Kelly is unable to pay his own bail: