Comments

> Ada review still needed.
Right, the tricky part is changing the handling of gnat_argv, so that's why
it's taking some time to review, plus the fact that we're quite busy with
our own internal transition to GCC 4.5, but Eric is looking at these
patches.
Arno

On Jun 25, 2010, at 11:10, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Joseph S. Myers wrote:>>> Various recent option handling patches of mine have got bogged down >> in>> piecemeal review of bits of the patches. In particular, several >> currently>> needs review of C++ and Ada pieces.>> An update to the status of this series (four presently uncommitted> patches, but one of those is now completely approved):>>> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg01968.html> needs C++ >> and>> Ada review.>> Ada review still needed.
Ada changes are OK.
>> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg02260.html> needs >> review for>> Ada and LTO pieces and the main language-independent part of the >> patch.>>>> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg02377.html> needs >> review for>> the whole patch (including Ada and Fortran pieces).>> If you wish to consider the Ada pieces as less mechanical than the > purely> mechanical changes to other front ends, then these also still need Ada> review.
Ada changes OK.
-Geert
>