Writing of Hazrat Mirza:extracts

A prominent Ahmadi said, “Like NO ONE has tampered with the Qur’an. That is a baseless allegation. Ahmadi Muslims read exactly the same Qur’an as does the entire Muslim world. There is difference in the interpretation of a few verses and that is all. No one has tampered with the status of Prophet Muhammad. He is the seal of all the prophets, just as the Qur’an says. We have not added another prophet.”

To me anyone but Prophet Muhammad abrogating the Qur’an is tampering with the Qur’an. As proof I quote from Hazrat Mirza’s own pen:

Hazrat Mirza wrote:
“”I have been writing in favour of the British Government from the past seventeen years. During all these seventeen years, in all the books which I wrote and published, I have been advocating to the people to be loyal to the British Government and have tried to persuade them to be sympathetic and obedient to government officers. I have given convincing lectures against Jihad and, as a matter of policy,I wrote may books in Arabic and Persian and published them in Arabia, Egypt, Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan “abrogating Jihad” and spent thousands of rupees in this propaganda.”
(Al-Barriah, Sept. 2, 1867, No. 3)

“I have filled shelves with books which I wrote in praise of the British, especially about the abrogation of Jihad in which many Muslims believe. This is a big service to the Government. So I hope for an appropriate and good reward.”
(Tabligh-e-Risalat, Vol. 7, P. 19)

“I have spent most of my life in ‘yeamanship’ (supporting and defending) of the British Government and in opposing Jihad. I continued my efforts till the Muslims became sincerely faithful to this Government.”
(Tiryaq-ul-Qulub, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 15, P. 155;Tiryaq-ul-Qulub, P. 15, Mirza Ghulam Qadiani)”

So as far as Jihad is concerned Ahmadis do not use the same Quran as orthodox Islam because of the above proof. There are 164 verses on Jihad in the Quran, and if they are removed, it will no longer be the same Qur’an. So Ahmadis must have a different Qur’an that will satisfy Hazrat Mirza’s abrogations. He has written and declared that he has abrogated “Jihad” and that is undeniable. He is also a mercenary, working for the British Raj and not for Allah above all others. I have only quoted what Hazrat Mirza himself has undeniably written. I wonder what spin you will put on this.

The Ahmadi also said that the Prophet Muhammad is the seal of the Prophets, but Hazrat Mirza writes quite differently:

“MIRZA CLAIMS EQUALITY WITH PROPHET MUHAMMAD

Mirza said: “Anyone who differentiates between me and MUSTAFA, he has not seen me and has not recognized me.” (Roohani Khazain vol. 16 p.171)

Official Qadiani mouthpiece, Al-Fazl from Qadian wrote:
“The entity of the promised Masih (Mirza), in the sight of Allah is the entity of the Holy Prophet . In other words, in the records of Allah there is no duality or difference between the promised Masih and the holy Prophet . Rather they both share the same eminence, the same rank, the same status and the same name. Although verbally they are two, yet in reality they are one and the same”. (Al-Fazl, Qadian, vol.3, No.37, dated 16th September 1915, as cited in Qadiani Mazhab page 207, 9th edition, Lahore.)

The Ahmadiyya Shahada (Qadiani Kalima)

Hazrat Mirza had to find a way around the original Shahada followed by generations of Muslims before him, because he has introduced himself as a Prophet, succeeding the Prophet Muhammad. And this is how he got around this convention.

BUT with the advent of Promised Messiah, ONE MORE PROPHET HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE MEANING OF Muhammad UR RASOOLULLAH …… thus to enter in Islam it is still the same Kalima, the only difference is that the advent of Promised Messiah has added one more prophet to its meaning…we don’t need a new Kalima, because Promised Messiah is nothing separate from Holy Prophet, as he says: ‘saara wujoodi wujoodahoo (my person became his person)’ and ‘he who differentiates between me and Mustafa has not seen me and not recognizes me’…..thus Promised Messiah is Muhammad Rasoolullah himself who has come again in this world to spread Islam, therefore we do not need any new Kalima. Yes if someone else had come then we may have required it — thus think all of you.” (KalimatAlFasl p.158 by Mirza Basheer Qadiani)

“Moreover, even if we accept by supposing the impossible that the sacred name of the Gracious Prophet () has been included in the sacred Kalima because He is the Last of the Prophets, even then there is no harm and we do not need a new Kalima because the Promised Messiah is not a separate entity from the gracious Prophet as he (Mirza) himself says: “My being is exactly the being of Muhammadur Rasoolu Llah”. Also, “One who discriminates between me and Mustafa has neither recognized me nor seen me”. And the reason for this is Allah Almighty’s promise that He would reincarnate “Khatam un Nabieen” in this world once more as a prophet as is evident from the verse “And others of them… Thus the Promised Messiah (Mirza Qadiani) is himself Muhammadur Rasoolu Llah, who has been incarnated in the world again to spread Islam. We do not, therefore, need any new Kalima. Albeit, a new Kalima would have been necessary, if some other person had been reincarnated instead of Muhammadur Rasool Llah. So contemplate!” (Kalimatul Fasl, page 158)

Thus Mirza Qadiani says:
‘One of the objections of the ignorants is also this that the followers of this man (Mirza) apply on him the words ['alaihe assalato wa assalam] and to say this is HARAM. The answer to this is that I am the Promised Messiah, and leave aside the saying of Salaat and Salaam, Holy Prophet Himself said that he who finds him, convey His salaam to him; and in all Hadiths at hundreds of places Salaat-o-salaam is mentioned for the Promised Messiah. When such words about me are said by The Prophet, Sahaba has said, rather God has said, then how can it be Haram for my Jama’at to say such words for me.”
(Risala Durood Shareef, Arba’een No.2 Roohani Khazain vol.17 p.349)

The Revelations (Wahi) of Mirza Qadiani
Mirza Qadiani began to openly reveal the revelations he had received. This reveals much of the mind of this man Mirza:
“The basis for our claims is not Hadith but Quran and that Wahi which comes to me. Yes, in support we also present those Hadith which are according to Quran and DO NOT CONTRADICT MY WAHI. Rest of the Hadith, I THROW THEM AWAY LIKE A WASTE PAPER.”
(Roohani Khazain vol.19 p.140)

“In Braheen-e-Qadianism, God has called me by the name of Ibrahim……”
(Arba’een No.3, Roohani Khazain, vol.17 p.420)

“My teachings contain orders as well as prohibitions and renovation of important injunctions of the Shari’at. For this reason God has named my teachings and the ‘wahi’ (revelation) that comes to me as a ‘boat. Thus see, God has declared my ‘wahi’, my teachings and allegiance with me to be Noah’s Ark and the basis of salvation for all human beings. Let he who has eyes may see and he who has ears may hear.”
(Arba’een, Vol. 4, footnote of page 6; Roohani Khazain, Vol. 17, p. 435).

“I say with swearing upon God that I believe in these inspirations in the same way as I believe in Quran and other books of God. And just as I consider Quran undoubtedly and surely the book of God, similarly I believe that that wahi which descends upon me is the word of God.” (Haqeetqatul Wahi, Roohani Khazain vol.22 p.220)

“I have similar faith in my Wahi as on Holy Quran and Torah.”
(Arba’een No.4 , Roohani Khazain vol.17 p.454)

“and the Word of God descended so much on me that if it is collected it will not be less than 20 parts.”
(Haqeeqatul Wahi, Roohani Khazain vol.22 p.407)

Mirza Better than Holy Prophet Muhammad (ma’azAllah):

However Mirza Qadiani was still not satisfied with his progress. He wanted to improve further. Was it spiritual evolution or delusions of grandeur, it is anyone’s guess. His next step was claiming superiority and excellence over Holy Prophet Muhammad . He said:
“But the fact is that the spirituality of Holy Prophet (in the form of Mirza Ghulam) in this end of the sixth millennium, that is in these days, is much more stronger and perfect and forceful as compared to those (first) years, like a full moon.”
(Khutba-e-Ilhamiah, Roohani Khazain vol. 16 p.271)

“The spirituality of our holy Prophet was conceived in 5th thousand (i.e. Makki birth) with its precise attributes and that period was not the climax of his spirituality’s development. It was rather the first step to the highest pinnacle of its perfection. Thereafter this spirituality manifested itself in its full glamour during the 6th thousand (his rebirth in Qadian) at the present time”.
(Mirza in Khutba-e-llhamiyah, Roohani Khazain, Vol.16, p.266)

He pointed to his followers that he has been given 300,000 signs and miracles whereas Holy Prophet was given just 3000. Praising himself, he wrote in his poetry: “For the Holy Prophet God showed only the sign of Eclipse of Moon But for me he has shown the sign of Eclipse of both Moon and Sun, thus will you disbelieve me.”
(Aijaz-e-Qadiani, Roohani Khazain vol.19 p.183)

He claimed that certain concealed or secret meanings of Holy Quran were not revealed to the Holy Prophet , but he has been informed about them. Thus Holy Prophet did not understand the meaning of Ibne Maryam, Dajjal, Donkey of Dajjal, Gog and Magog, Daabatul Ardh.
(Izala-e-Auham, Roohani Khazain vol.3 p.473)

“The Islam (of Holy Prophet) started like a new moon and it was destined to become (during the time of Mirza) like a full moon.”
(Roohani Khazain vol.16 p.184)

“And it is obvious that the Fath-e-Mubeen (Distinct Victory) came during the time of our Prophet and another Victory remained, which is much greater and more obvious; and it was destined that its time would be the period of Promised Messiah.”
(Roohani Khazain vol.16 p.288)

Following poetry was recited in front of Mirza Qadiani by a follower. Mirza is reported to have said: ‘JazakAllah’ and after having written it in beautiful calligraphy, hung it in his house. “Muhammad has descended again amongst us and is greater in his glory than before He who wants to see Muhammad in perfection Should look at Ghulam Ahmad in Qadian.”
(Qazi Zahoor Ahmad Akmal Qadiani, printed in Qadiani Newspaper Paigham-us Sulh dated 14th March 1916)

“The mental development of the Promised Messiah (i.e. the Mirza Qadiani) was higher than that of the Holy Prophet . And this is only a part of the superiority which the Promised Messiah has over the Holy Prophet. The mental faculties of the Holy Prophet could not manifest fully owing to the deficiency of civilization; although the ability existed. They have now manifested themselves fully through the Promised Masih by virtue of the advancement of civilization.” (Review of Religions, May 1929, Qadiani Mazhab, p.266, 9th Ed. Lahore)

Grave of the Holy Prophet is one of the Most Sacred site for Muslims all over the world. This is how Mirza humiliates it (May Allah and His Messenger forgive me for quoting such profanity):
“And God chose such a DESPICABLE PLACE to bury the Holy Prophet which is EXTREMELY STINKING and DARK and CRAMPED and was the PLACE of the EXCRETA of INSECTS…”
(Roohani Khazain vol.17 p.205)

Mirza Qadiani finally claims to be the FINAL PROPHET
Having evolved the basis for his claims that he believed would be accepted he finally claimed to be THE FINAL PROPHET.
“Time and again I have said that according to the verse ‘wa aakhareena minhum lamma yalhaqoo behim – and others of them who have not yet joined them..’(al-Quran 62:3)in BUROOZI (partial-sainthood) form (translated by Qadianis as Image/Alter-ego/Counter-type) I am the same prophet, the KHATUM-UL-ANBIYA (Last of the Prophets). And twenty years ago God named me Muhammad and Ahmad in Braheen-e-Qadianism, and declared that I am the Holy Prophet’s incarnation. Thus my prophethood in no way clashes with the status of Holy Prophet as the Last of Prophets, because shadow is inseparable from the original. Since I am Muhammad in a ‘shadowy way’, thus this way the Seal of the Last of the Prophets is not broken, because the prophethood of Muhammad remained with Muhammad.”
(Mirza Qadiani in Ek Ghalti Ka Izala, Roohani Khazain vol.18, p.212)

“Blessed is he who has recognized me. Of all the paths to God I am the Last Path, and of all his Lights, I am the last Light. Unfortunate is he who forsakes me, because without me all is darkness”.
(Kashti-e-Nooh, Roohani Khazain, vol.19, p.61)

“I am the only one selected in this Ummah to get the name of ‘Prophet ‘. No one else deserved this name…. and it was bound to happen… so that as mentioned in the Sahih Hadith that ‘there will be only one such person’, that prophecy is fulfilled.”
(Haqeeqatul Wahi, Roohani Khazain vol. 22 p.407)

“The Prophethood ended on our Prophet . Therefore after Him there is no Prophet except who has been illuminated by His Light and who has been made His inheritor by God. Know that Finality was given to Muhammad since the Beginning; and then given to him (i.e. Mirza) who was taught by His Spirit and made His shadow. Thus blessed is the one who taught and blessed is the one who learned (i.e. Mirza). Thus FINALITY was destined for the SIXTH MILLENEUM, which is the sixth day in the days of God…… Thus the Promised Messiah was born in the SIXTH Millennium.”
(Zamima Khutba Ilhamiah, Roohani Khazain vol. 16 p. 310)

Mirza Basheer Qadiani s/o Mirza Qadiani writes:

“Thus only one person got the status of Prophethood in the Ummah of Muhammad….except for the Promised Messiah (Mirza) no one followed Holy Prophet to such perfection to be called the Shadow of Holy Prophet. Therefore only Promised Messiah was chosen to be called the Prophet.”
(Kalimat Al-Fasl, Review of Religions, Qadian, p.116, No.3, vol. 14)

Official Qadiani Magazine wrote:

“These quotations prove that except for the Promised Messiah no one else can be a Prophet…After Holy Prophet only one Prophet was necessary and the coming of too many Prophets would have hindered the Wisdom and Schemes of God.”
(Tasheed-ul-azhan, Qadian, No.8, vol.12, p.11 dated August 1917)”

Either Hazrat Mirza was talking rubbish, or some Ahmadis do not know what he wrote. All references have been listed. Are Ahmadis going to deny that Hazrat Mirza wrote what I have quoted, or to tell me it is out of context?