Delegations of parliamentarians work to strengthen Israel’s diplomatic
position abroad – even if they disagree on how to do it.

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before.
Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications,
like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations,
we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open
and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news
and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

On the surface, Israel’s ties with other countries are managed by the Foreign
Ministry, and sometimes the Prime Minister’s Office, or the recently established
Public Diplomacy Ministry. However, for decades, there has been another channel,
by which public figures have represented Israel abroad to very little fanfare:
parliamentary diplomacy.

Throughout the year, delegations of MKs travel
to international organizations and present their views on various issues –
though, usually, they’re asked to discuss the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict.

Often, they meet representatives of countries that do not have
formal relations with Israel, including Arab countries, and attempt to block
decisions – such as recognition of a Palestinian state – that would cause
problems for the government.

According to Knesset Speaker Reuven Rivlin,
the main advantage of MK participation in interparliamentary groups is that it
builds personal relations with decision-makers in other countries.

“When
two people have personal, mutual trust in each other, they are more willing to
listen to each other’s points of view, even if they disagree,” he
explained.

Rivlin said that when he explains a concept like settlements
to foreign parliamentarians, they are able to understand the reasoning behind
it, instead of jumping to label Israeli policies as “imperialism or right-wing
ideology.” Even if they disagree, he added, they take the Israeli position more
seriously when they have personal ties to an MK.

“Today, there is
opposition to Israel’s right to exist,” Rivlin said. “Interparliamentary
connections help Israel explain the facts and show that we are not bloodthirsty
– we want to strengthen our state.”

MK Meir Sheetrit (Kadima), who
returned from an Interparliamentary Union (IPU) Committee on Middle East
Questions in Geneva on Wednesday, has been attending IPU meetings regularly
since he was a Likud MK in the 13th Knesset.

The Kadima MK extolled the
value of such meetings, saying that in his opinion, as Israel is increasingly
diplomatically isolated, and European countries identify with the Palestinian
position, the IPU is an important forum in which Israel can defend itself to the
world.

One of Sheetrit’s major accomplishments at the IPU took place in a
meeting last October, in Bern, Switzerland.

Sheetrit convinced the
“Twelve Plus Group,” which includes the US, Canada, Australia, most of Europe
and Israel, that it would be more important for it to participate in a
discussion on hunger in Africa than on Palestinian statehood. With key states
absent from the vote, the Palestinian Authority withdrew its bid for recognition
as a state in the IPU.

MK Majallie Whbee (Kadima) is vice president of
the Parliamentary Assembly of the Mediterranean (PAM) and leads the Israeli
delegation to the EU-affiliated Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (EUROMED), where
he has often found himself debating parliamentarians from countries like Syria,
Lebanon and Libya.

The Kadima MK and former deputy foreign minister
pointed out that many members of interparliamentary forums become ministers,
which increases the chance that a positive experience with an Israeli delegation
could have an influence on future policies abroad.

Although there are
many discussions on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in PAM, Whbee says he has
also represented Israeli positions and expertise on other issues. For example,
in 2011, he brought an expert on earthquakes to lecture representatives of other
Mediterranean countries.

“Everyone is willing to listen to the Knesset,
because it is, first and foremost, a symbol of true democracy,” Whbee
explained.

MK Einat Wilf (Independence), who leads the delegation to the
NATO Parliamentary Assembly and has participated in delegations to EUROMED and
the European Parliament, quipped that the OECD Parliamentary Budget Officials
was the most refreshing of the various international organizations because it
“treats Israel so normally, that it’s abnormal.”

“Israel is an equal
member in economic matters [in the OECD], which creates a better atmosphere,”
she said. “Everywhere else, people only want to talk about the Palestinian
issue.”

Wilf pointed out that, in a way, MKs “shoot themselves in the
foot,” because they often bring up conflict, rather than building bilateral ties
in other topics, like the environment.

For MK Arye Eldad (National
Union), however, conflict with the Palestinians is the only real reason to
participate in interparliamentary forums, which he called “mostly nonsense” and
“overinflated organizations that steal the public’s funds.”

“Most
international parliamentary meetings are about as important as the neighborhood
parliament in Afula over coffee and burkeas,” Eldad quipped. “The real diplomats
are foreign ministers and ambassadors, and parliamentarians do not represent
their government’s positions.”

He also pointed out that decisions made by
such organizations usually are not legally binding, and opined that they often
cause Israel real harm.

The only reason to join these delegations,
according to Eldad, is to “cut our losses” when “Israel-hating Arabs” use them
as a stage to bash Israel.

MKs must point out to the world that “they are
our enemies, who want to destroy us,” he said.

All of the MKs leading
continual delegations to interparliamentary organizations are from Kadima,
except for Wilf.

In addition to Sheetrit and Whbee’s activities abroad,
MK Yohanan Plesner (Kadima) leads the delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly
of the Council of Europe (PACE) and MK Nahman Shai (Kadima) chairs the group of
MKs at the European Parliament.

The coalition is more limited in its
ability to send MKs on delegations, because 31 of them are ministers. In
addition, MKs are often bound by coalition discipline to be present for
important votes.

Rivlin explained that most Likud MKs, including those
that he personally invited, turned down offers to join these delegations, but
highlighted MK Tzipi Hotovely and Deputy Prime Minister Silvan Shalom as members
of his party that are active on the interparliamentary stage.

Rivlin
pointed out that in the opposition, there are numerous MKs with experience in
the international arena who are qualified to represent Israel abroad, but those
with similar experience in the coalition are almost all
ministers.

Similarly, Sheetrit said that many coalition MKs who are not
ministers do not feel comfortable defending Israel in English, and are not
willing to commit to traveling to meetings abroad several times each
year.

Sheetrit explained that he always makes sure to present his views
as his own and not as those of the government. He added that IPU delegations
must always include coalition and opposition members, and encouraged more MKs to
join him at the IPU.

Despite the seemingly apolitical reasons for
Kadima’s dominance on the interparliamentary scene, Eldad warned that Rivlin
should not give the party all of the responsibility in this matter, arguing that
it hurts Israel to give the Left control of parliamentary
diplomacy.

Since the Knesset is composed of varied members, parties and
positions, there have been cases of friction between delegation members on
different sides of the political spectrum.

Eldad, for example, left a
delegation to PACE in October, because its leader MK Doron Avital (Kadima)
supported the forum’s raising the PLO’s status to “Partner for Democracy,” and
would not allow Eldad to voice his opposing opinion.

Avital, at the time,
responded that Eldad’s opinion – that Jordan is the Palestinian state – is
irresponsible and does not represent the government’s point of view as reflected
by Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s 2009 speech at Bar-Ilan University in
Ramat Gan, in which he discussed a future Palestinian State.

Wilf also
recounted situations in which there were “problems with delegation leaders’
behavior,” in that they harshly slammed Netanyahu and said he does not want
peace. Such criticism led to Israeli delegations to argue in front of their
hosts.

“Some say this shows how democratic Israel is,” she stated, “but I
think that if you’re sent to represent Israel, you shouldn’t engage in
opposition activities.”

Rivlin praised the pluralism of Knesset
delegations, pointing out that they usually include MKs whose views are “at the
center of the political map.”

“Some may favor compromise more and some
less, but most present Zionist views, and their disagreements only emphasize
Israeli democracy,” Rivlin said.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

The Jerusalem Post Customer Service Center can be contacted with any questions or requests:
Telephone: *2421 * Extension 4 Jerusalem Post or 03-7619056 Fax: 03-5613699E-mail: subs@jpost.com
The center is staffed and provides answers on Sundays through Thursdays between 07:00 and 14:00 and Fridays only handles distribution requests between 7:00 and
13:00
For international customers: The center is staffed and provides answers on Sundays through Thursdays between 7AM and 6PM
Toll Free number in Israel only 1-800-574-574
Telephone +972-3-761-9056
Fax: 972-3-561-3699
E-mail: subs@jpost.com