You know that's the point right? The old head mod essentially gave the subreddit to SRS and some other group (I don't remember who exactly but they were basically polar opposites of SRS). Whoever claimed it first would get the sub, which SRS did.

They then proceeded to do exactly what would piss off the user base of /r/punchablefaces (who also happen to be the "anti-PC" crowd).

To be honest, I always found /r/punchablefaces to be a bit of an unsavoury place, so what SRS did was hilarious.

We don't get to determine terminology. Do you also have a problem with the word heterosexual?

If you declare yourself normal then people who aren't like you are therefore implied to be abnormal which is a term that has an implicit wrongness to it. Of course, it was probably your intention to imply trans people are abnormal.

Gender dysphoria, previously known as gender identity disorder, is a real thing, yes. It's the distress caused when the brain's gender identity and the body's sex do not match. Do you know the most common and effective way of relieving this distress?

If a woman cannot support a child on her own, I agree it's in her best interests to abort. However you cannot force her to do so. When the child is born, I think both parents should have an obligation to support them.

Like I said, it's an unequal situation with no completely fair solution. I prefer to prioritise the child.

I don't get why people love R1 so much. It was really boring. By the films nature, you know where the plot goes so the movie needed good, likeable characters to carry it. Except the characters weren't likeable or enjoyable to watch at all. Despite being nearly a clone of the original, TFA is much better (I'd even put it above RotJ in my rankings) because of the characters and the charisma of the actors, especially Kylo Ren and Rey.

The only redeeming feature was the battle at the end, but by that point the movie had lost me and it would have been better if I cared about the people fighting.

I didn't even like the Vader scene at the end (though maybe that's just me being a sourpuss). It just screamed "fanboy wank material" at me.

Except you consider trans women to be men and presumably vice versa (if you want to remain consistent). Therefore, a man having sex with a trans woman would be gay act and a man having sex with Buck Angel (the guy in the picture) would be straight act.

You did say something about sexuality. Maybe not explicitly, but gender and sexuality are heavily linked, so it is implied.

Yes, because things that happen in your brain are definitely not real. Pack it up, psychology! Gender dysphoria is fake! OCD is made up! Depression is a load of crap! Thank you for enlightening us oh Wise One!

In 2013 the DSM-5, basically the big book of mental disorders, stopped calling transgenderism a disorder and started calling gender dysphoria (the distress you feel when your gender and your sex don't match) a disorder instead.

It would seem psychology disagrees with you. When an entire field of study says you're wrong (save for a few outliers), maybe it's time to reconsider your position.

It is very bigoted to purposefully refer to a trans person as the opposite gender (calling them a "he" when they are a "she" for instance). Trans people also refer to their sexualities from the perspective of their gender, not their sex because that makes way more goddamn sense.

If a trans man only likes women, he is a straight man. Saying a man is gay for liking women is absurd and the stupidest thing I have ever heard.

Your definition is a product of the conflation between sex and gender and your entire point reeks of linguistically prescriptive bullshit. If your dictionary says that transgender women are men, then your dictionary is in dire need of updating. In this day and age, word "homosexual" among not shitty people means what I wrote.

Plus, it's a little bit more than "hurt feelings". We are talking about the mental well being of transgender people. Being ostracised from society by close minded bigots such as you takes it's toll.

Honestly, it would probably better for everyone involved to just get rid of these labels on sexuality entirely. It's all a bit fluid and fuzzy to have these rigid definitions with no wiggle room.

The woman in the video may be genetically male, but she is still a woman. You denying that and persistently misgendering her does not help anyone. It's this kind of shitty attitude that is the reason why the suicide rates of transgender people is sky high.

because fucking trans anything means you're gay, or at least pansexual or whatever

Only if you want to entirely reinvent what the word "gay" means.

i reckon you know about all of this new sociological theory shit so fucking a trans person would push you so far from the straight end of the spectrum that you shouldn't be considered straight anymore

I mean, I'm not straight to begin with. I'm bi with a strong preference for women (cis or trans).

Also, I haven't really done any real research into this "new sociological theory" as you call it. My knowledge comes from talking to real trans people and, y'know, treating them like actual humans with respect and dignity, rather than shitting all over them, misgendering them and generally being a right arse about it.