frankcal20 wrote:Was this before or after the wind blew and Bradford's shoulder slipped out of socket.

not bad Frank - the shame of it is that Bradford can at least throw the ball beyond the line of scrimmage with either arm

as far as Suh is concerned - why do we need to make the defense a priority? We need an offense that can score some points - we need to be able to have an offensive line that can both run the ball and give the QB at least some time to pass the ball whenever we have to

It's that time of the year - RUN THE DAMN BALL - if they figure out how to stop it then find another way to RUN THE DAMN BALL

Gibbs4Life wrote:Trade with the Rams for No.1 throw in ey and no.4, draft SUH.

Pair SUH with HAYNESWORTH and ORAKPO and CARTER and FLETCH

Bruce Allen just doing what he feels is right and building that DEFENSE

Insane. Trade your one good receiver and neglect the offensive line for the defensive line with Haynesworth already there? With this class coming out, Skins would be crazy not to go OL. If they did go D, it should be for safety (Berry-Tenn or Mays-USC), but it all starts in the trenches, man.

Cowboys 7- Redskins 6 (All we needed was 2 minutes of the 60)
Cowboys 17 - Redskins 0 (Way to NOT show up for the 100th anniversary)
----- TWO EASY -----

Draft Spiller -- NO thanks, he may not be an every down back.
Draft Berry -- NO thanks, we can't spend another top pick on a db.
Draft Suh -- NO thanks, we have a very capable D-line already
Draft a QB -- NO thanks, the poor rookie would be dead by the 8th game.

We must (and will, I believe) pick Olineman...and a number of them. My hope is, Danny doesn't open up his wallet in FA to sign a bunch of aging vets to play OLine so he can pick someone like Spiller, Berry, Clausen or Bradford, etc... I know Snyder, he loves picking players that sell jerseys.

We need young Olineman from the draft. I'm not sure how many of our current Olineman are even good enough to make a NFL roster. It might be necessary for us to find 6 OR MAYBE MORE O-linemen. It's so scary that Vinnie could let our Oline get so bad, so old, so horrible (forgive me for going on), so embarrassing!! IMO, every year you need to find one lineman that is a starting caliber player on either defense or offense and another player that can play in the future on the other line. Oline and Dline represent 9 of 22 starters -- and very important starters! They also represent 9 of your 26 reserves. Vinnie needs to be de-balled for picking DBs and WRs every year...little guys are nice, but your big guys win NFL games.

DT's (Suh's position):
Haynesworth = 9-10 when healthy and on the field
Griffin = 6 when healthy and on field
Montgomery, Alexander & Gholstin = 4-5

Oline:
Rabach = 4 (he may end up being the only returning starter)
Dockery = 3-4 (not sure he fits the Shanahan OLine mold)
All the rest = 1!!! (we may have 1 or 2 other guys that even make our team as backups next year.) I'm not trying to be funny or exaggerate here either. If anyone believes I'm off base with this, please tell me which Olineman you'd rate above a 1?

Nothing against Suh, we would have a stud DLine, probably the best in the NFL and of course, he'd upgrade us to a 7 (initially), probably 8-9 later, but that increase ain't worth it -- we need to increase our "1's" across our "undrafted free agent" oline.