Post navigation

Your sanity is not dependent on what you know or believe or trustate. “Trustate” (an archaic word revived for clarity) means “to believe as a result of a message communicated to you by someone you trust.” It differs from “believe” in that, while “believe” requires only an idea, “trustate” requires a mixture of trust (in someone) and an idea.

Truth and science are two different things. Science includes a type of truth, universal truth. Universal truth is the truth that can be known through universal perception; that is, it is the truth that can be known by anyone through their perception of their environment. Now, not all truth can be known by everyone. One reason this is so is that some people simply don’t have the IQ, the intelligence, to know certain things.

Now, science also includes “pretruth.” Pretruth – hypothesis and theory – are ideas that are being studied to determine if they are true. These ideas are uncertainties and potential truths. Therefore, science includes both truth and uncertainty (potential truth).

UPAX’s CDSM-6 devotes five hundred pages to the discussion of homosexuality. Here are the most basic and most important principles relating to homosexuality, mental health, and morality:

We start by pointing out that there are two general types of homosexuality:

1. HW – Homosexual Weakness

2. HC – Homosexual Choice

HW – HOMOSEXUAL WEAKNESS – TYPE ONE

This type of Gay falls into four subcategories.

MDH – MENTAL DEFICIT HOMOSEXUALITY

“MDH Gays” are homosexuals who are mentally handicapped.There are two types:

MDH-1 Gays: this type does not have sufficient intelligence to know that what they are doing is wrong.

MDH-2 Gays: this type has sufficient intelligence to know that what they are doing is wrong.

DH – DELUSIONAL HOMOSEXUALITY

“DH Gays” are homosexuals that suffer from one or more delusions. DH Gays fall into two categories:

DH-1 Gays: This type of Gay once knew the truth but has deceived themself into believing that what they are doing is not wrong.

DH-2 Gays: Virtually all DH-2 Gays are children who have been raised to be Gay and are under the age of twelve. This type of Gay has believed all their usually short life that what they are doing is not wrong.

EWH – EMOTIONAL WEAKNESS HOMOSEXUALITY

“EWH Gays” are, for example, little children who have been forced into a homosexual lifestyle by more powerful, sexual predator Gay adults. These children, usually mentally, emotionally, and physically brutalized by these predator adults, are too terrified (hence, emotionally weak) to refuse to engage in the homosexual activity.

OH – OTHER HOMOSEXUALITY

The description of “OH Gays” is beyond the understanding of most people; so, we will not provide it at this time.

HC – HOMOSEXUAL CHOICE – TYPE TWO

“HC Gays” are people who know that homosexuality is wrong and freely and voluntarily choose to engage in homosexual activity.

The release of CDSM-6 was necessary to safeguard the sanity of millions of people in the face of the multiple threats of the DSM-5. The APA [American Psychiatric Association] can burn in hell forever for the criminality demonstrated by the DSM-5.

Today, UPAX, the United States Psychiatric Association, released CDSM-6 (Correct Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Sixth Edition) to replace the spurious and unscientific DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition) released by the American Psychiatric Association last May.

The president of UPAX said:

The release of CDSM-6 was necessary to safeguard the sanity of millions of people in the face of the multiple threats of the DSM-5. The APA [American Psychiatric Association] can burn in hell forever for the criminality demonstrated by the DSM-5.

Just like in politics, there are, in the world of psychiatry, liberals and conservatives. Liberal psychiatrists, like those at the APA (American Psychiatric Association), believe that, if we eliminated all rules, we would end all feelings of guilt and anxiety. However, that has been disproved countless times in history in that societies that did eliminate all rules did not eliminate all feelings of guilt and anxiety. In fact, the feelings of guilt and anxiety increased.

It is time to remove Justice Kennedy and the fully liberal Justices from the Supreme Court for their pro pervert decisions because of their willful gross incompetence in evaluating research on human sexuality and discrimination in favor of perverts.

No, we don’t believe in the death penalty for Gay-perverts, though that is what they deserve. We just wanted to make the Gay-perverts hysterical. Why? Because they have been brainwashing millions of American children and young people into believing Gay-perverts are normal and because they have turned a number of American children and young people into Gay-perverts.

Are Gay-perverts mentally ill? Well, first, we must define the term “mentally ill.” “Mentally ill” means:

Being one who suffers from a disease (an internal cause of injury to oneself) of the mind.

Gay-perverts experience an immoral craving for same-sex intimacy. This immoral craving causes them physically and mentally injurious anguish and guilt. The mental injury takes the form of diminished cognitive (mental) ability. The physical injury is a degree of loss of physical health.

The claims that the anguish and guilt arise from external causes and, thus, that Gay-perverts have no mental disease is easily refuted by the fact that:

Gay-perverts experience anguish and guilt in decadent societies, which have no external causes.

One’s political stance (position) should be informed (guided) by moral truth. However, political positions are sometimes informed (guided) by competing (conflicting) moral truths. In such cases, one must find the “righteous compromise” between the competing moral truths. Thus, the right to privacy keeps us from investigating Gay-perverts just because they claim to be Gay-perverts.

Leaders, teachers, educators, etc. that seek to brainwash our children into believing being a Gay-pervert is normal should be stopped by any means whatsoever, short of maiming or killing these brainwashers.

People should be educated in the truth about Gay-perverts and Gay-pervert activists from the public record – Satinover, Laumann, APA legal briefs, etc., etc.

Supreme Court Justices that have discriminated in favor of Gay-perverts should be removed from office.

The U.S. Post Office and the FBI deemed One: The Homosexual Magazine, a lesbian, gay, and bisexual publication, obscene, and as such could not be delivered via U.S. mail. The publishers of the magazine sued, and lost both the first case and the appeal. The Supreme Court accepted the case and reversed it, marking the first time the Supreme Court ruled in favor of homosexuals.

Bowers v. Hardwick (1986)

The Supreme Court ruled 5–4 that consenting adults do not have a constitutional right to engage in homosexual acts in private, upholding a Georgia law. The majority said the “right of privacy” under the Due Process Clause does not give homosexuals the right to engage in sodomy. The “right to privacy” protects intimate marital and familial relations, but the Court said it does not cover gay sodomy because “no connection between family, marriage, or procreation on the one hand and homosexual activity on the other has been demonstrated.” This decision, considered a serious blow to the gay-rights movement, was overturned in 2003’s Lawrence v. Texas decision.

Romer v. Evans (1996)

In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court struck down Colorado’s Amendment 2, which denied gays and lesbians protections against discrimination, calling them “special rights.” According to Justice Anthony Kennedy, “We find nothing special in the protections Amendment 2 withholds. These protections . . . constitute ordinary civil life in a free society.”

Boy Scouts of America v Dale (2000)

In another setback to the gay-rights movement, the Court ruled 5–4, that the Boy Scouts of America have a constitutional right to ban gays because the organization’s opposition to homosexuality is part of its “expressive message.”

Lawrence v. Texas (2003)

The Supreme Court, 6–3, overruled a Texas sodomy law and voted 5–4 to overturn 1986’s Bowers v. Hardwick decision. “The state cannot demean their [gays’] existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime,” wrote Justice Kennedy in the majority opinion. In his dissent to Lawrence v. Texas, Justice Scalia said the court has “largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda.”

United States v. Windsor (2013)

The Supreme Court ruled that the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional. In a 5 to 4 vote, the court ruled that DOMA violated the rights of gays and lesbians. The court also ruled that the law interferes with the states’ rights to define marriage. It was the first case ever on the issue of gay marriage for the Supreme Court. Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. voted against striking it down as did Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas. However, conservative-leaning Justice Anthony M. Kennedy voted with his liberal colleagues to overturn DOMA.

Hollingsworth v. Perry (2013)

The Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage opponents in California did not have standing to appeal the lower court ruling that overturned the state’s ban, known as Proposition 8. The ruling will remove legal battles for same-sex couples wishing to marry in California. However, the ruling did not directly affect other states.

In the case of Lawrence v. Texas (2003), a “Gay” case (see Important Supreme Court Pervert Decisions), APA (American Psychiatric Association) lawyers lied(1) to the Supreme Court but liberals on the Supreme Court believed them! Are these liberal Justices stupid or just plain corrupt. Either way they need to be removed from office.

In 1973, some, not all, of the psychiatrists at the APA, the American Psychiatric Association, declared that “Gays” (Gay-perverts) were normal. However, they never explained to anyone how they arrived at this conclusion and have refused to explain ever since.

Download larger, high-quality images, “Little Johnny Campaign” PDF.

Multiple Venues: We present Dr. Satinover's research paper in several venues. We've added Dr. Satinover's paper as an embedded PDF document through a link on the left side of this page. In addition, of course, you can continue to use the links directly above.