Postscript: This little game has been going on for 68 years. Specifically, the U.S. government has been trying to replace the Syrian government with folks who will be subservient to America since 1949 … 3 years after Syria became an independent nation.

In 1957, the American president and British prime minister agreed to launch regime change again in Syria using a false flag. (False flags are not only historically documented, but presidents, prime ministers, congressmen, generals, spooks, soldiers and police have ADMITTED to planning and carrying out false flag attacks).

The 2017 Trump version “The Assad Regime’s Use of Chemical Weapons on April 4, 2017,” is likewise under fire from numerous quarters. Generally reliable journalist Robert Parry is reporting that the intelligence behind the White House claims comes largely from satellite surveillance, though nothing has been released to back-up the conclusion that the Syrian government was behind the attack, an odd omission as everyone knows about satellite capabilities and they are not generally considered to be a classified source or method. Parry also cites the fact that there are alternative theories on what took place and why, some of which appear to originate with the intelligence and national security community, which was in part concerned over the rush to judgment by the White House. MIT Professor Theodore Postol, considered to be an expert on munitions, has also questioned the government’s account of what took place in Khan Sheikhoun through a detailed analysis of the available evidence. He believes that the chemical agent was fired from the ground, not from an airplane, suggesting that it was an attack initiated by the rebels made to appear as if it was caused by the Syrian bomb.Be seeing you

The White House accused the Russian government on Tuesday of engaging in a cover-up of thechemical weapons attacklast week by Syrian forces that promptedAmerican missile strikes, saying that United States intelligence and numerous contemporaneous reports confirmed that the Syrians used sarin gas on their own people.

In a declassifiedfour-page reportthat details United States intelligence on the chemical weapons attack and contains a point-by-point rebuttal of Moscow’s claims, the White House asserted that the Syrian and Russian governments had sought to confuse the world community about the assault through disinformation and “false narratives.”Read the rest of this entry »

The New York Times recently had an article talking about how many coalition soldiers had been seriously hurt after discovering buried caches of old chemical weapons in 2003. The chemical weapons had been used against Iran by Iraq. The US government put a lid on these casualties.

Who supplied these chemical weapons? US, UK, Germany, France and Holland. The usual US sock-puppets.

I can recall, around this time, Rush Limbaugh screaming with delight after being told by Rick Santorum that chemical weapons had been found. One of these old chemical dumps was what Santorum was talking about. I knew at the time where these weapons came. I am betting Limbaugh and Santorum did too.

This article by Eric Margolis adds more detail to this story. Including how the UK sent scientists over to Iraq to help develop Saddam’s chemical stockpile.

The NYT article admits European countries and some US companies were involved. They don’t go so far as to explain the major sponsor for this was the Reagan administration.

The NYT was all for Hussein’s war against Iran. They got what they wanted.

William G. Sesler, former PA state senator, writes in the 6 Oct Erie Times-News that there is no substitute for the US in foreign affairs. Let us just say there is no one quite like the US in foreign affairs. He starts out

Let’s first consider the issues arising from Syria’s use of chemical weapons on Aug. 21 that killed more than 1,300 people, including more than 400 children. These acts were done in direct violation of international law.

While it is possible the government used gas the UN investigators have not laid blame on anyone. Iraq’s gas weapons which we never found were supposedly sent out of the country, presumably to Syria.

And where did Iraq get poison gas? The US of course along with anthrax, so Hussein could take out Iran. See here

Iran has hated our guts ever since the CIA overthrew their government and installed the Shah. Supplying chemical and biological weapons to Hussein did not help. The WMD issue is not a winner for us.

The earliest biological warfare I know of goes back to the French and Indian war where our proper English friends knowingly gave Indians small pox contaminated blankets (See Conceived In Liberty by Rothbard)

So much for Kerry’s morality spewing.

So whom do you think is the greater danger to world peace – Syria or the self-proclaimed world enforcer and it’s Middle East puppet master “ally” with proven track records of mass destruction?

Syria is the enemy of our enemy. Yet we are arming Al Qaeda to conquer Syria in their goal of a pan Sunni, anti-west, anti-Christian Middle East.

We are not good at the nation building thing.

It is time we followed Ron Paul’s advice and quit meddling in things that are not our business, attempt constructive diplomacy and peaceful trade. Let’s see how far that gets us.

It can’t be any worse than our current win their hearts and minds or burn their village philosophy.