No...its not old news. It is still very much alive and should be kept alive. Lockheed is and Boeing are the most notorious offenders and need to be distanced from the toy amd model manufacturers are far as their greedy, grubby mitts can be. OK...so they made great airplanes...they were paid handsomely for them too...THAT is where it should end.
Vammy

No...its not old news. It is still very much alive and should be kept alive. Lockheed is and Boeing are the most notorious offenders and need to be distanced from the toy amd model manufacturers are far as their greedy, grubby mitts can be. OK...so they made great airplanes...they were paid handsomely for them too...THAT is where it should end.
Vammy

I agree, but it was a bill introduced almost 2 years ago. It's old news, most everybody who is anybody in the model business knows about it, and it has be very widely publicized. The only difference now is it's a stand-alone bill because it failed as part of the defense bill.

*****GWS Brushless Motor Mount*****

Dear Friends and Customers,

After the release of GWS Brushless Motor, many of you have been asking and longing for this motor mount. Here we have the fresh new product for you. It will not take too much time to be ready to ship them out. I am sure you will like this Brushless Motor Mount.

l Design for stick mount
l Easy on & easy Off
l Mount motor on the front or back

Let you guess what is the notch on the side for!!

We welcome you to contact us. We will try to keep you updated about GWS product and information. If you are interested in this new product, please contact your GWS sales representatives or email to export@gws.com.tw.

Just curious... isn't the motor (prop) shaft positioned too low on a mount like that? Imagine the location of the motor (prop) shaft on a GWS 350 geared system. It's higher. Almost at the stick location. So... short of cutting up a GWS plane to reposition the stick mount... how will these work?