QueryTrackerBlog

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Writer, Beware the Plagiarist

For a college professor like me, plagiarism is always a concern. But problems aren’t limited to the classroom. Every writer needs to be wary—both so you don’t accidentally plagiarize someone else, and to guard your own work against plagiarism.

The internet has made it so easy to copy and paste material into one’s notes—or even right into one’s manuscript—that many people do exactly that, either forgetting that they lifted the material or assuming no one will ever figure out they didn’t do the writing themselves. Others assume that if they change a few words here and there that they’ll never be caught. And sadly, the fact that it’s so easy to copy leads some people to assume that it must be okay.

Take former Harvard student and William Morris Agency client Kaavya Viswanathan, for example, who signed a two-book contract with Little, Brown and Company for an alleged $500,000 advance. Within a few weeks of the book’s release, readers were finding passages that had clearly been lifted from Megan McCafferty’s Sloppy Firsts and Second Helpings, Meg Cabot’s The Princess Diaries, Sophie Kinsella’s Can You Keep a Secret?, Tanuja Desai Hidier’s Born Confused, and even Salman Rushdie’s Haroun and the Sea of Stories.

McCafferty’s Sloppy Firsts: Though I used to see him sometimes at Hope's house, Marcus and I had never, ever acknowledged each other's existence before. So I froze, not knowing whether I should (a) laugh (b) say something (c) ignore him and keep on walking ... 'Uh, yeah. Ha. Ha. Ha.' ... I turned around and saw that Marcus was smiling at me.

Viswanathan’s novel: Though I had been to school with him for the last three years, Sean Whalen and I had never acknowledged each other's existence before. I froze, unsure of (a) what he was talking about and (b) what I was supposed to do about it ... 'Ha, yeah. Uh, ha. Ha.' ... I looked up and saw that Sean was grinning at me.

As soon as the first accusations were made, Little, Brown released a statement from Viswanathan saying

I wasn't aware of how much I may have internalized Ms. McCafferty's words. I am a huge fan of her work and can honestly say that any phrasing similarities between her works and mine were completely unintentional and unconscious.

The publisher of McCafferty’s novels shot back,

We find both the responses of Little, Brown and their author Kaavya Viswanathan deeply troubling and disingenuous. Ms. Viswanathan's claim that similarities in her phrasing were 'unconscious' or 'unintentional' is suspect. We have documented more than forty passages … that contain identical language and/or common scene or dialogue structure from Megan McCafferty's first two books. This … is nothing less than an act of literary identity theft ... it is inconceivable that this was…youthful innocence or an unconscious or unintentional act.

It is said that their [black-footed ferrets'] closest relations are European ferrets and Siberian polecats. Researchers theorize that polecats crossed the land bridge that once linked Siberia and Alaska, to establish the New World population.

The passage is almost indistinguishable from the one Paul Tolme wrote in the summer of 2005 for Defenders Magazine:

Their [black-footed ferrets'] closest relatives are European ferrets and Siberian polecats. Researchers theorize polecats crossed the land bridge that once linked Siberia and Alaska to establish the New World population.

Signet, who published Edwards’ book, argued first that many of the sources were so old that they were fair use, but later decided to review each of Edwards’ books in search of plagiarism. According to the Wikipedia entry on Edwards, “In April 2008, Signet stopped publishing Edwards' books ‘due to irreconcilable editorial differences.’ In an interview, Edwards said that she did not know she was supposed to credit sources, and her husband stated that Edwards gained ideas from her reference works but did not ‘lift passages’.”

If these sorts of things are a concern for published authors, imagine how often this must happen among unpublished writers. That means you need to be extra vigilant as an unpublished writer.

First, you must know exactly what plagiarism is so you never do it yourself. According to plagiarism.org:

All of the following are considered plagiarism:

* turning in someone else's work as your own

* copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit

* failing to put a quotation in quotation marks

* giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation

* changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit

* copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not (see our section on "fair use" rules)

Most cases of plagiarism can be avoided, however, by citing sources. Simply acknowledging that certain material has been borrowed, and providing your audience with the information necessary to find that source, is usually enough to prevent plagiarism.

Second, you must choose your critiquing partners carefully. If someone takes your work and puts it in front of an agent or publisher first, what will that do to your chances of ever getting published yourself? We’ve heard stories about people trusting a critique partner with their material—from queries to nonfiction proposals to novels—only to hear from a third party that they’ve been plagiarized. In other words, a reader who sees both your work and your crit partner’s “work” realizes that your crit partner is stealing your material! And in some mind-blowing situations, plagiarists have even sent their plagiarized material to the person they stole from for critique!

Like Viswanathan and Edwards, many if not most plagiarists swear they’ve done nothing wrong. Because they changed some words here and there or integrated your materials into their own work, they may argue that it’s all original. In fact, little may be original — plagiarists often steal from multiple sources.

In the book Man for Himself, psychologist Erich Fromm calls people like this “exploitative characters.”

Such people will tend not to produce ideas but to steal them. This may be done directly in the form of plagiarism or more subtly by repeating in different phraseology the ideas voiced by others and insisting that they are new and their own… Things which they can take away from others always seem better to them than anything they can produce themselves… Because they want to use and exploit people, they ‘love’ those who, explicitly or implicitly, are promising objects of exploitation, and get ‘fed up’ with persons whom they have squeezed out.

We’re not suggesting you become paranoid and avoid critique partners. Crit partners are invaluable, both to help you improve your manuscript and to help you improve as a writer. But it’s a good idea to pay attention to anything that makes you feel uncomfortable or violated.

A few clues that you’re dealing with an exploitative character:

* Fromm says, “They often make ‘biting’ remarks about others…[and they display] suspicion and cynicism, envy and jealousy. Since they are satisfied only with things they can take away from others, they tend to overrate what others have and underrate what is theirs.” In other words, look out for people who often gossip about others in a negative way, or who rave about how they’re going to write something “as good as [your story]” or whatever this week’s Big Novel is.

* Be wary of someone who’s absolutely paranoid that someone else is going to plagiarize them. People often fear others doing to them what they’re doing to others.

* This is a big one: Beware of people who are copycats in other areas of their lives. If they’re constantly regurgitating other people’s opinions as if they’re original thoughts, or if they jump on the bandwagon to try to get a little glory from other people’s new and fabulous ideas, beware.

* So is this: Exploitative characters will often come right out and say they’re using people, groups, or ideas, or plan to use them. They may boast that they’re only doing something because of what they can get from it. If you hear these things on a regular basis, run for your life (and your manuscript’s!).

Some other ideas to help you stay safe:

* Get referrals to critique partners from writers you trust.

* Ask other people in your writing community about a potential critique partner to see if anyone has caveats.

* Try sharing a few chapters at a time with someone rather than sending them your full manuscript. Then wait for a while before sending more and listen for anything that makes you uneasy.

19 comments:

Wow, I'm speechless, and hoping I haven't accidentally made the same mistakes . . . especially with the sentence structure part.

There's a writing book out (I'm not going to say which one, though) in which the author (well respected author at that) suggests taking passages you admire from a book and, using the same form and structure, rewrite it to fit your story. Now I'm wondering about that advice. Of course, the idea is the style ends up being representative of your own, and not the work you're modeling. But still, you could so easily make the mistakes listed here.

Thanks, Carolyn, for the great advice! Now I'm going to be super paranoid.

I can't thank you enough for writing this. I know two people personally who have had their work plagiarized.

In one instance, the author's entire plot and characters were taken. Both the author and the plagiarist queried the project simultaneously. I'm happy to report that, in the end, the original manuscript found representation while the plagiarized version did not.

Looking back, and reading your list now, I can see about half a dozen red flags that should have served as warning. Your list is right on - and I'm so grateful you are saving unsuspecting writers from the heartache I've witnessed firsthand.

I've also been told that if you snail mail your entire manuscript to yourself, making sure to sign your name over the seal of the envelope, and then do not open it when you receive it, that it can help prove you were the original author. (Since the date is verified by the post office, anything resembling your manuscript that can be proved to have come about at a later date is suspect.)

Can this system be adapted to help prevent crit partners from stealing work? It would mean finding a fool-proof way of verifying the exact date that the crit partner received the material.

This is a great post (and I love the picture). I know a few people who've been plagiarized, and it's terrible. One person is still finding his plagiarized story in collections years after he thought the matter was settled.

Another suggestion: If you meet in person with a critique group, make sure you don't allow anyone to leave with copies of your work. We print out copies, pass them around as the writer reads, and then collect them up again to review written comments. It's a good idea to make sure all the copies come back to you. I would never share my work online with someone I didn't know well.

Well, here is my recent dilemma. I wonder what Carolyn would suggest to do with this.

I recently read a short story for a new member of my writing group. And it's got striking similarities to a novel I'm writing. Her overall plot (and this is a short story) is very similar to a tangential substory running in my novel. I mentioned when I returned my comments that her story was interesting, and it was similar to tangential plot in a story I was working on.

I'm not sure if I should say more or leave it at that. I would hate for her to think I stole the idea from her, but I don't really want to discuss my own novel (which is related) as I feel it's innovative.

WriterGirl -- I'm not sure if you're saying she's writing something similar after seeing your material -- if that's the case, I'd hesitate to share anything more with her. If it's coincidental -- and that does happen -- the two of you might want to agree NOT to read each other's writing for these particular projects so you don't accidentally influence each other. I know some writers who had that happen.

As for GrooseMoose -- everyone's entitled to their opinion.

The cases mentioned in my article were humiliating for the publishers, and Kaavya in particular has been blackballed in the publishing world. I don't think James Frey is relevant to the discussion, because he didn't plagiarize. He did something unethical, but that's neither here nor there.

Do be aware that more and more publishers are running the manuscripts that are turned into them through anti-plagiarism software to make sure the material the author has turned in to them is unique and original. (And take it from someone who uses this software for classes -- you do NOT want to be found out this way. The software provides extremely damning evidence against you.)

Wonderful information. I'm having some difficulty with the following example falling under the plagiarism umbrella, however, unless the writer has very unusual sentence structure that would be recognizable in any form: "changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit"

The following sentence has the same structure, but surely wouldn't be considered plagiarism.

Thanks guys! I know from discussions in my college and grad courses that I've taken that many people plagiarize without even realizing it. And the internet only makes it easier. Thanks for highlighting this topic for us.

* * * *

We've chosen you for an award - The Kreative Blogger Award!! Thanks for keeping an interesting blog to read!

i JUST posted about this on my blog today here. Stephenie Meyer seemed to copy L.J. Smith's The Vampire Diaries when she wrote Twilight . I'm amazed allegations didn't reach higher proportions than what they did.

We interview for any new member in our critique and test drive them for a fit. We use the University of Washington critique method of reading 5 pages out loud, with members responding verbally and with notes on what they heard. No take home, but lots of support and helpful, critical attention.