When I saw this thread title in the forum preview box on the main page I thought Mabus had shown up again. I was not happy with his choice of thread titles.

Me too

Ahh.. did I miss a nasty one from him, then?

But yes, as far as really bad movies go… it’s always the ones that are sincere efforts at what someone thinks is pure genius that wind up being the hideously bad, bad, BAD movies. Look at Ed Wood’s works.

Signature

1: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. If it does what it says, you should have no problem with this.
2: What proof will you accept that you are wrong? You ask us to change our mind, but we cannot change yours?
3: It is not our responsability to disprove your claims, but rather your responsability to prove them.
4. Personal testamonials are not proof.

Nah.. At that point it’d go through the other side and be hailed as a ‘Surrelalist Masterpiece’, and be talked about in film class for decades.

Signature

1: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. If it does what it says, you should have no problem with this.
2: What proof will you accept that you are wrong? You ask us to change our mind, but we cannot change yours?
3: It is not our responsability to disprove your claims, but rather your responsability to prove them.
4. Personal testamonials are not proof.