Yeah, you beat nothing but a crazy bluff. Other streets are played fine. 4b/exploitable fold is fine too unless you have reads he'd stack off 170bb with worse.

#3

9th June 2016, 6:01 AM

c9h13no3 [8,362]

Not an easy fold, but you need to find a way to let go on the turn. AQ likely isn't even in your opponent's 3-bet range.

File this one under *dont pay the nits*.

#4

9th June 2016, 6:27 AM

John A [4,093]

re: Poker & $25 NLHE 6-max: Easy fold on the turn vs unknown?

Not an easy fold, but one you can make.... I think the better question here is, did your opponent play this hand well?

#5

9th June 2016, 9:54 AM

nkat [138]

not an easy fold at all!! You say unknown but stats say 400 hands? You can fold this turn against this kind of player

4b pf.. and not folding to a 5b/shove.

edit: 1st time i saw this i thought you cold called pf.. yeah im calling turn. fact you're utg makes it meh but w/e... you're gonna see all kinds of funny things at these stakes have to have a solid read to fold.

#6

9th June 2016, 10:40 AM

TimovieMan [2,264]

Online Poker at: Pokerstars

Game: Texas Holdem

I 4-bet preflop.

With 400+ hands on him, don't you have any reads on his bet sizing?
Without a read, it's still not an easy fold, but it's a fold you can make.

I probably play it the same, though.

Edit: his turn bet-size was your exact remaining stack size? More often than not, that's not a bluff and you can find a fold.
Funny that. If he makes it a little bigger (like 120 or 125bb), then I'm probably calling. :P

#7

9th June 2016, 11:14 AM

Xmaster [201]

Game: Holdem,8Game

thank you for your opinions guys! Of course, a player with 400 hands is not unknown. But I didn't have the stats avaiable (snap poker888), and I couldn't remember him, because I didn't play for a longer time (and somehow I dindn't make a note).

@timovieman: no I had him covered, he went all in

#8

9th June 2016, 12:06 PM

TimovieMan [2,264]

Online Poker at: Pokerstars

Game: Texas Holdem

re: Poker & $25 NLHE 6-max: Easy fold on the turn vs unknown?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xmaster

@timovieman: no I had him covered, he went all in

Whoops, yeah. Getting too used to seeing "and is all-in" in the hand histories.

I probably play it the same way postflop. So hard to let go of an overpair.