Featured

$21,000,000,000 AUD PA 100,000 LAWYERS, BARBARISUM NO RULE OF LAW it is literally the Manson family on $21,000,000,000 Billion Dollar organised crime spree by way of fraud on steroids, lie cheat slander steal kill, in full knowledge, consent and facilitated by the judiciary, 2 to 4 deaths per day.

The real issue this shows no moral compass from our civil service employee’s, that is a clear indicator of APD [sociopaths and psychopaths].

1% of the population have Antisocial Personality Disorder APD [ref DSM5] that is 230,000 psychopaths in Australia alone. Worldwide 70,000,000.

APD [psychopaths] is why we are always at war, they are genetically flawed, disposing them to be criminally and morally insane.

So where are they all, Terrorist States, ISIS, socialist states, civil services? Seems psychopaths gravitate to positions of power it is their nature. Please ask the [our] government

1. Do they employ psychopaths in civil services?

2. How many psychopaths are employed in or civil services?

3. Why are they employing psychopaths in civil services?

4. Have they warned the people they are employing psychopaths in civil services?

terrorist act – the calculated use of violence (or the threat of violence) against civilians in order to attain goals that are political or religious or ideological in nature; this is done through intimidation or coercion or instilling fear

If men are to be precluded from offering their sentiments on a matter which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences that can invite the consideration of mankind, reason is of no use to us; the freedom of speech may be taken away, and dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter. George Washington (22 February1732 – 14 December1799)

Feminist antisocial sociopathic pac or any other PAC’s have no place in the ‘Australian Commonwealth’ courts, by way of constitutional separation of power, it is treason, complete disregard for children and law, unlawful oppression and tyranny.

King John exploited and abused the traditional sources of revenue. Desperate for money to wage wars in defence of his estates, John demanded unprecedented amounts in ‘scutage’, or money from his tenants in lieu of providing knights for the king’s service. He was intemperate and at times cruel in his manner of enforcing his rights from his land-holders and from the church, and unjust in his treatment of people at all levels. There was no redress against the absolute power of the king.

Barons who resisted paying the excessive levies had their lands confiscated and members of their families taken as hostages. By 1215 rebel barons outnumbered those loyal to John. They united and marched on London from the north and captured the Tower of London on 17 May 1215.

LNP, Mr. TONY ABBOTT, KNOW THE ENEMY … ANTISOCIAL PARACITIC AMBUSH APD … FEMINIST PIGS ARE MORE EQUAL IN AUSTRALIA, HIDEN WAR ON AUSTRALIAN CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, THERE IS NO ETHIC’S OR MORALS OR HONOUR OR RULE OF LAW OR VALUES OR AUSTRALIAN STANDARDS IN THIS DYSFUNCTIONAL CHILD TRAFFICKING MONEY HUNGRY INDUSTRY, GRAFT, TREACHERY AND SEDITION INSIGHTING DEEP HATRED OF THE JUDICURY, BUREAUCRACY AND GOVERNMENT ELECT … WE MUST CHANGE THIS FOR OUR CHILDREN AND NATIONAL BEST INTEREST.

Albert Einstein once said “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”.

Family courts are designed to ambush people, not deliver justice.

Socialists are the most antisocial dangerous deadly animals on the planet.

Family courts are an abomination of treachery sedition and corruption, absolute power corrupts absolutely; John Dalberg-Acton, not in the least children’s interest to subject them to these sociopathic animals.

Humans can, inhuman’s can not self govern, Human the quality of being humane; kindness; benevolence. inhuman lacking human qualities of compassion and mercy; cruel and barbaric, not human in nature or character.

We are facing malignant evil, just doesn’t play by the rules, no ethics or morals.

The corruption of the Australian family courts is so complete and being not only ignored by all levels of government, both the socialist left ALP and the Fascist right LNP are both sociopathic, Narcisstic, exploiting as is sociopathic feminism.

Vote for anyone that doesn’t give preferences to ALP (socialist) or LNP (fascist)

The democratic system we have is out of date, where the swindle is, we surrender our democratic vote to fearless leader A B C or D and funky party A B C or D gives us justice, maybe, not likely, not ever.

It is tyrannical because the parties are based on hierarchy, hierarchies
form pyramid structures; there weakness is the points, all the power is focused
at the top, an unjust structure, where you are ignored.

…And we shall procure nothing from any one, either personally or indirectly, whereby any part of these concessions and liberties might be revoked or diminished; and if any such thing has been procured, let it be void and null, and we shall never make use of it ourselves or through someone else.

We cant build families on Marxist socialist feminism or build a nation, as socialism fascism communism, why are we allowing feminism to overrun or courts, public services and universities.

George Christensen MPin Parliament has already described and explained feminism is a’ Trojan Horse’ .

“Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.”
― Nelson Mandela

You are naïve if you go to the Australian Family Court in good faith, believing you will get “high-quality and timely judgments” from the FCA judiciary, they are openly dysfunctional, antisocial, lie, slander and cheat, threaten and abuse, narcissism.

There would be so much less cost and waist if public employee’s were held accountable to we the people. Corruption is just ignored. Not good business not civil society.

The three dogs of family law courts are feminism, socialism and capitalism.

Feminism is egocentric antisocial sociopathic controling and manipulation, its crowning achievement is ABORTION killing babies, an ideal is the sum of its maxims, the axiom of feminism it is an abortion, if a feminist believes in abortion by this premise accept their maxima of self abortion.

There is noting more violent than abortion, is that in the child’s best interest?

The swindle with abortion is the at certain intervals, the ovaries release an ovum, which passes through the fallopian tube into the uterus.

The fertilization of the ovum with the sperm occurs at the ampullary-isthimic junction only.

Once the ovum is released it is not part of the women’s body, and when fertilised with sperm it is a separate human life, that they chose to kill, “pro-choice” to kill.

We are up against a well funded well organised massive group of animals focused on power and money, the very same as facist and socialist ‘PAC’s/.

Most DV and abuse against children is by women, given that DV between men and women is nearly 50/50, = most DV is by women.

This finding has been confirmed across nations and cultures by pre-eminent violence researcher Murray Straus, whose 2007 paper concluded that dominance by the female.

This proves feminism is a false premise, but a multibillion $ industry.

I’m sure the MSS and the KGB are having a good laugh at ASIO CIA MI5 and have a lot to do with the feminist movement, they have the same tactic’s, the leading feminist here is Julia Gillard, owner of Emilie’s list, and has Russian ties, our national security agencies are a joke, they should be telling the world about what human rights abuses going on in the eastern block.

Today there are 30 million men women and children in forced socialist labor camps, what do you think feminists will do?

Reality is we need to protect our children from all that will do harm, is our only reason for existence, when it comes to that I for one am pro-choice, what ever force or action that takes, we can not count on any government as has been proven time and time again.

The are 30million or more men women and children locked up in socialist Labor camps today. Free the people with free democracy.

Judicial government corruption dishonesty disinformation tyranny, it is a psychological war on families, this is where Australia is going fascist / socialist / feminism, I don’t think we will be able to stop it.

All law and democracy is designed to address dysfunctional ‘Anti-Social’ behaviours and events, to allow social civilised society to flourish to its full potential, the hieratical judicial system is easily corrupted and in its self a dysfunctional failure.

Judges like all public servants need to be on annual contract, under constant review.

The real issue we are facing is the dominating prevalence of sociopathic antisocial individuals within society, up to ~1 in 100, in Australia with its current population is some 230,000 psychopath’s, their extremely controlling manipulative and destructive behaviour, the very reason we have judicial and governments systems, that in them selves attract controlling sociopaths like flies … http://fathersunionaustralia.com/wp/dsm-5/

Bobby Dickerson “Agreed but internally the system is corrupted thru and thru. Unless everybody gets on the same page, gets past the shock and awe of what has happened, the loss, the grief we will never move forward to finding solutions. The effort has to be WorldWide with everybody locked and loaded !”

“The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn’t exist.”

We were ambushed by Family Court of Australia Brisbane judiciary gross misconduct, acting illegally deliberately knowingly breaching Australian Commonwealth law , Malfeasance, dysfunctional antisocial and Narcissistic, the Australian Constitution proved misbehaviour or incapacity., this judiciary is dangerous and should not be approached.

What should be straight forward 50/50 has been dragged through Family Court Australia from August 2010 at huge expense, by Legal Aid Queensland family law team of narcisstic antisocial politically violent duplicitic pseudo feminists, with purgery and deceit.

The kicker is the more conflict the more profit corrupt ICL child lawyers and the industry makes, the industry makes every effort to lie, purger and cheat to fuel conflict.

What is happening is a cycle of evil, antisocial behaviour being administered, starting from sociopathic parenting.

” non accidental verbal or symbolic acts by a child’s parent or caregiver that result, or have reasonable potential to result, in significant psychological harm to the child.” DSM5

“What’s done to children, they will do to society” – Karl Menninger, MD. (1893-1990) American psychiatrist.

They are sociopathic gender war mongers creating conflict, are sociopathic collectives, which is a degenerate parasitic subspecies, the lowest form of humanity, that invoke all conflict and wars.

We need you to step up, stand up for each other, fight the good fight, your kids need to know you never gave up on them.

50/50 shared care is the civilised standard.

Contact with Non-Custodial Fathers and Children’s Wellbeing

Although it is usually assumed that mothers are children’s primary care givers, fathers also play an important role in children’s development. Besides providing economic resources, fathers are also sources of emotional support, practical assistance, information, guidance, and supervision.
A large body of research shows that the support and involvement of both parents is associated with a number of positive child outcomes, including academic achievement, good behaviour, psychological adjustment, a positive self- concept, and social competence.

Furthermore, when both parents exercise control and supervision appropriate to children’s developmental level, children experience a similar range of benefits (Rollins and Thomas 1979; Maccoby and Martin 1983).

My young son is missing since November 2012 because I complained to CAFS Queensland children’s detention centre Eagleby about unexplained burses.

I have found the Australian family courts deliberately and intentionally extremely treacherous and corrupt trafficking in children, extinguishing hard won democratic rights and freedoms, fair and just hearings, they are exploiting and abusing my young son as well as many Australian children.

Tyranny is narcissism (DSM-5), and that is the problem we are having globally
with all governments, Tyranny / narcissism built on hierarchal pyramid
structures.

True democracy forms a sphere where all members have an equal voice and vote,
the leaders are at the centre but have no more power than the newest member,
only true democracy can be just and deliver justice for all.

Do we trust ALP, do we trust the LNP, and can we trust any party?

NO, ever wonder why there are so many protests and wars?

Purely because of lacking democracy.

How about this, you give us our democracy, our democracy will give us our justice.

Party politics and policy is not proper true democracy.
The Australian Democrats http://www.democrats.org.au
The party is based on the principles of honesty, tolerance, compassion and direct democracy through postal ballots of all members, so that “there should be no hierarchical structure …

by which a carefully engineered elite could make decisions for the members.”[8]:p187 From the outset, members’ participation was fiercely protected in national and
divisional constitutions prescribing internal elections, regular meeting protocols, annual conferences—and monthly journals for open discussion and balloting. Dispute resolution procedures were established, with final recourse to a party ombudsman and membership ballot.

Fathers have nowhere to turn to, and no knowledge or defence against this treacherous Narcisstic abuse.

Dear ***** [FUA] , I hope that you don’t mind my writing for some advice. on the 29th – 07 – 2012 we lost our eldest Son to suicide … he was trying desperately to gain some access for us to see his 3 youngest Children. We’ve not seen them now for almost 3 years . is there somewhere my Husband and I can go to … we are pensioners, we baby sat those Children each day of their lives, until their Mother took them away …… I’ve now lost all hope of anything being able to help us…. Kindest Regards ***** *****

Please investigate the mass deaths linked to the Australian family courts, some 2 or more deaths per day in Australia alone.

Being in the courts now know to well how nasty and corrupt these people in the industry are. I personally know people who have suicided.

Malfeasance and complicity the current Attorney-General Jarrod Bleijie is ignoring the corruption in legal aid Queensland, mass murder, Attorney-General Jarrod Bleijie given LNP the reputation as the nasty party, there is no rule of law or civil rights in the Australian family court or Queensland.

Under Anthony Reilly Chief executive officer Legal Aids Queensland are extremely corrupt, spending millions of Queensland dollars on employing politicly violent feminist in their family law team abusing children and families producing false family reports, perjury, tampering with evidence, lie and cheat children.

Quote from a un named ADF soldier “…It was as filthy a Family Law Court fight as had ever existed. I made a promise to my son that before this has finished these people will never do this to another child in this Country ever again. I keep my promises. I don’t care if they are murdered by some-one for their behaviour – its not my problem. All because I was an ex Commando. Problem is, I found out the truth, something they didn’t expect. What this Court is all about is exactly the same as the current proposed Laws to stifle and control the media.”

It is at the point where the Australian public needs and have a duty to take up arms to protect their children and democracy.

Where there is a void of ethic’s or morals it is inhuman, only animal, humanity needs to act, when an animal kills it needs to be destroyed.

What is presented as feminism is in fact a Dysfunctional Antisocial Narcisstic Collective. Criminally motivated exploitation of our children, driven by greed for power and money, the same ilk as ‘Emily’s List’ of bigoted feminist, feminism is socialism / communism in a dress.

The family court judiciary is corrupt with no accountability, they know exactly how to break and defeat the law and justice and they enjoy doing it, destroying lives and killing deliberately and knowingly.

They actively avoid truth, building on understanding and, mediation, adopting political violence.

As Darwin predicts they are a variant species collective with no ethics or morals, as many regimes throughout history as is Bashar al-Assad now proving.

Dysfunctional anti-social Narcisstic individuals need to be detected early and rejected before they can collect in numbers and destroy innocent lives.

Humanity is still young naïve, still have not learnt enough from behavioural tragedy children suffering.

Peaceful resolution is not profitable.

Dysfunctional Narcissism seems the modern term for evil it is very where especially ever in bureaucracy, judiciary and government, it is the real enemy of civilized society, peace and harmony.

It is well hidden in the back ground behind many facades socialism, fascism, feminism and so on… And needs to be openly recognised and discussed.

Psychology as the study of human behaviour that needs to be taught early in school, straight from the DSM-5 along with the constitution and law.

Ultimately psychology has so much to offer civilized society.

Julia Gillard’s narcissism was her downfall, we just seen the narcissism at the head of ALP.

Feminists like socialist and fascism is just another façade for age old enemy, Narcissism. Narcissism is and has always been the real enemy

Child exploitation is the new 16 billion dollar per year boom industry, with no regard for the kids, the families or the law..

The most notable aspect of socialist regimes is how antisocial and despotic they are, duplicity.

The Australian family court antisocial judiciaries are killing 2 or more good people every day here in Australia alone.

It is an antisocial psyc war on children and families aimed at defeating justice for power and profit, thousands of Australian families are victimised, trapped every year.

50/50 shared care is the civilised standard.

If for no good reason one parent works against 50/50 it could be said they are being dysfunctional, antisocial and should be assessed for antisocial personality disorder.

What we are seeing is justice being defeated by collectives of dysfunctional antisocial narcisstic judiciaries and bureaucracies simply because there is no accountability. By this function good practitioners are ejected.

Ever wonder how these narcisstic antisocial and psychotic people get jobs and position in judiciaries and bureaucries, ever wonder why the world is in perpetual war?

Owen’s theorem Owen’s syndrome Robert Owen (14 May 1771 – 17 November) was a Welsh social reformer and one of the founders of socialism and the cooperative movement. Owen’s son Robert Dale stayed at New Harmony after its collapse. He had a different assessment of his father’s experiment.

“All cooperative schemes which provide equal remuneration to the skilled and industrious and the ignorant and idle must work their own downfall, for by this unjust plan … they must of necessity eliminate the valuable members … and retain only the improvident, unskilled, and vicious.”

The essential features of a personality disorder are impairments in personality (self and interpersonal) functioning and the presence of pathological personality traits. To diagnose a personality disorder, the following criteria must be met

A.Significant impairments in self (identity or self-direction) and interpersonal (empathy or intimacy) functioning.

B.One or more pathological personality trait domains or trait facets.

C.The impairments in personality functioning and the individual’s personality trait expression are relatively stable across time and consistent across situations.

D.The impairments in personality functioning and the individual’s personality trait expression are not better understood as normative for the individual’s developmental stage or socio-cultural environment.

E.The impairments in personality functioning and the individual’s personality trait expression are not solely due to the direct physiological effects of a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse, medication) or a general medical condition (e.g., severe head trauma).

Antisocial Personality Disorder

DSM-5 Criteria – Revised April 2012

The essential features of a personality disorder are impairments in personality (self and interpersonal) functioning and the presence of pathological personality traits. To diagnose antisocial personality disorder, the following criteria must be met:

B.Self-direction: Goal-setting based on personal gratification; absence of prosocial internal standards associated with failure to conform to lawful or culturally normative ethical behaviour.

AND

2.Impairments in interpersonal functioning (a or b):

a.Empathy: Lack of concern for feelings, needs, or suffering of others; lack of remorse after hurting or mistreating another.

b.Intimacy: Incapacity for mutually intimate relationships, as exploitation is a primary means of relating to others, including by deceit and coercion; use of dominance or intimidation to control others.

B. Pathological personality traits in the following domains:

1. Antagonism, characterized by:

A. Manipulativeness: Frequent use of subterfuge to influence or control others; use of seduction, charm, glibness, or ingratiation to achieve one„s ends.

A. Irresponsibility: Disregard for – and failure to honour – financial and other obligations or commitments; lack of respect for – and lack of follow through on – agreements and promises.

B. Impulsivity: Acting on the spur of the moment in response to immediate stimuli; acting on a momentary basis without a plan or consideration of outcomes; difficulty establishing and following plans.

C. Risk taking: Engagement in dangerous, risky, and potentially self-damaging activities, unnecessarily and without regard for consequences; boredom proneness and thoughtless initiation of activities to counter boredom; lack of concern for one„s limitations and denial of the reality of personal danger.

C. The impairments in personality functioning and the individual’s personality trait expression are relatively stable across time and consistent across situations.

D. The impairments in personality functioning and the individual’s personality trait expression are not better understood as normative for the individual’s developmental stage or socio-cultural environment.

E. The impairments in personality functioning and the individual’s. personality trait expression are not solely due to the direct physiological effects of a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse, medication) or a general medical condition (e.g., severe head trauma).

F. The individual is at least age 18 years.

Narcissistic Personality Disorder

DSM-5 Criteria – Revised June 2011

The essential features of a personality disorder are impairments in

personality (self and interpersonal) functioning and the presence of pathological personality traits. To diagnose narcissistic personality disorder, the following criteria must be met:

A. Significant impairments in personality functioning manifest by:

1.Impairments in self functioning (a or b):

a. Identity: Excessive reference to others for self-definition and self-esteem regulation; exaggerated self-appraisal may be inflated or deflated, or vacillate between extremes; emotional regulation mirrors fluctuations in self-esteem.

b. Self-direction: Goal-setting is based on gaining approval from others; personal standards are unreasonably high in order to see oneself as exceptional, or too low based on a sense of entitlement; often unaware of own motivations.

AND

2. Impairments in interpersonal functioning (a or b):

a. Empathy: Impaired ability to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others; excessively attuned to reactions of others, but only if perceived as relevant to self; over- or underestimate of own effect on others.

a. Grandiosity: Feelings of entitlement, either overt or covert; self-centeredness; firmly holding to the belief that one is better than others; condescending toward others.

b. Attention seeking: Excessive attempts to attract and be the focus of the attention of others; admiration seeking.

C. The impairments in personality functioning and the individual‟s personality trait expression are relatively stable across time and consistent across situations.

D. The impairments in personality functioning and the individual‟s personality trait expression are not better understood as normative for the individual‟s developmental stage or socio-cultural environment.

E. The impairments in personality functioning and the individual‟s personality trait expression are not solely due to the direct physiological effects of a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse, medication) or a general medical condition (e.g., severe head trauma).

THIS IS A POLITICAL COMMUNICATION PAGE / SITE AS INFERED AND ACTUAL FREEDOM OF SPEACH INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION. Warning–any person and/or institution and/or Agent and/or Agency of any governmental structure including but not limited to the Australia and United States Federal / State / local Government also using or monitoring/using this website or any of its associated websites, you do NOT have permission to utilize any information nor any of the content contained herein including, but not limited to photos, and/ or the comments made here. You are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, disseminating, or taking any other action against any person with regard to this site material and the contents herein. The foregoing prohibitions also apply to your employee(s), agent(s), student(s) or any personnel under your direction or control. The contents of this profile are private and legally privileged and confidential information, and the violation of personal privacy punishable by law.

we are a Union we raise issue with the government and departments

We can’t give you any advice, were not lawyers, I do suggest you learn to use stealth, ‘high quality’ audio and video (12meg) record every meeting and ‘especially any court reporters psyc etc’, and suggest you get talking to these people regards your case asap … Family Law Web Guide …

Any person who, by violence or by threats or intimidation of any kind, hinders or interferes with the free exercise or performance, by any other person, of any political right or duty, shall be guilty of an offence.

Penalty: Imprisonment for 3 years.

“By the end of today, another 200 children will have been cruelly separated from their fathers in secret family courts.”

Fatherlessness is an obscenity. No child should be denied their human right to a father yet nearly 1 in 3 children now lives without a father in the UK – that’s nearly 4 million fatherless children. Help us end the cruel & degrading treatment of families by the government.

Why is there only a parliamentary office for women, and not

children and men?

SPEAK UP LET US HEAR YOU, JOIN US,

WE ARE INVITING ALL FAMILY AND FRIENDS TO JOIN WITH US IN BUILDING A NATION NETWORK SUPORTING GOOD FATHERS.

It is well know and documented Australian Federal Magistrates and Family courts, state and federal departments are over run with bigotry, corruption, completely unabated discrimination and abuse directed against Fathers, negatively impacting on children.

kids need Dad’s.

The bureaucratic abuse of Dad’s is costing not only billions in public funds more over it is destroying the lives of children and Fathers.

Stand up for all Australian Kids, these new laws will only harm kids, help bring back justice and equality to Australia.

Australian Kids need your support more than ever.

Send this to your member of parliament and every other member you can now before it’s too late…

Dad’s and kid’s alike are victims of abuse and policies.

Globally, society is suffering under the weight of abuse of public office.

We are demanding a ROYAL COMMISSION into CORRUPTION in and around the AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL and FAMILY COURTS

When you sign the petition (Check your Email and junk mail box for he confirmation code so you post appears here)

Then click ‘register’ on the LEFT side of this page as well and Please Forward to family and friends…

WARREN GIBSON,

Justin Gonsalez,

Steve Wickenden, 4218 CHILD ABUSE THERE IS NO EXCUSE.

chris, 4215 i will do what eva it takes to rid this as my kids are the victims and fatherless..my childsupport i pay goes towards paying her lawyers as even my family are getting threatning letters.the schools they go wont give me imformation on there development..my story goes on as ive been fighting past 7years with no joy..i have commited no crime or violence yet have been painted like that..all along have been told to walk away..yet i ask why should i??i am there father..aleination of children is child abuse yet doesnt get mentioned..why???if i did to the kids what there mother is i wouldnt be here..ide be locked up..i will do what eva it takes to help make changes and give what our kids diserve..and thats support and love that only a father can give..

plupesype,

Alex,

xxxxxxxx, 2283

Shane Hampson, 4209 THERES NO EXCUSE FOR THIS INEQUALITY

Craig Havenaar, 2169 I am in a blended Family , a Dad and step Dad to 9 kids, 2 of them who are teenagers are being forced by the courts to not be with me, initial reasons were because of false allegations I was not fit enough to care for them, what about the other 7 ????????????? if that isnt hypocrisy I dont know what is, and I will bring this up in the media to highlight the situation, it’s no threat, its called democracy !!!

xxxxxxxx, 5000 the destruction of fatherhood is the destruction of the nation .. and this is increasingly obvious to some .. with eyes to see …and hearts to love …

ingrid jusice, 5114 my family and my son have gone through hell in the federal court,8 years of listening to bullshit and lining lawyers pockets,also the judges seem to be sooooo biased towards mothers,yes thats right its an unfair system

Danny Bennett-Hillier, 2154 Great to know that others are pushing for change!

Lisa Macumber, 3136 Its about time the government stood up and did something to protect our men before more of them end up suiciding and our children are left alone, confused and fatherless

John D Mahoney, 2010

John Findlay, 4115 Why am I perceived to be a lesser parent because of my genitals ? Why do I have to fight in court and spend vast amounts of money for the right to spend time with my children ? Why do I have a DVO against me for a TXT message when I was trying to protect my children from a cult ? Why dont I have any say in my childrens lives ? Why isnt this important to everyone when almost 50% of families are failing ? Why are women so nastie and willing to use their own children as a tool of revenge. Why does everyone know that women are abusing the system except the judges that hand down decishions. The whole system has been corrupted by the lure of money into the pockets of moraly bankrupt lawyers and blinkered judges. We all only want fair ! nothing more, nothing less !

Michael Sheehan, 4478

Michelle Wood, 5290 3 years in court for my brother and my family and him have to spend thousands to listen to some of the most ridiculous crap ever to come out of an adults mouth, meanwhile his ex is fully funded by Legal Aid and enjoying every moment!!

martin caporn, 5019 When it is done, less men and fathers will be lost or distressed. They will be productive again.

Max, 4217 My ongoing experience, it is a beat-up from the get go and very much still is. My now 2yo son’s primary attachment is with me because I cared for him from birth he cries when he see the mother, she took him to get welfare and free housing. With all the video and affidavits showing this, the court consultant and the family report writer still claim the attachment is with the mother, she enjoys abusing and neglecting him with the full knowledge and support of legal aids and the courts. They even write her affidavits for her (and got her name wrong in a signed and filed affidavit). My lawyer won’t talk to me, past on documents, file my affidavits making sure I don’t get a hearing at all. The reality is it is fully syndicated corruption, exploiting kids, stripping the father of their money. The courts and legal aid run list of their preferred consultants and lawyers, a genuine honest consultant or lawyer wouldn’t make it on their lists, and it is multibillion dollar industry, report writers are making ,000.00 a week, lawyers 20,000.00 a week, nice at the tax payers guaranteed expense.

Zaida Berrios, I am a woman and I support fathers. I am not a citizen of Australia. This is happening in America also.

xxxxxxxx, 3000 Equal Rights for all? More women in the board rooms? More women in the defence forces. More men should be acknowledged as fathers important in their children’s lives and often making a major contribution to their view and understanding of the world.-We can be engineers, electricians, doctors, dentists to rig workers, but some reason it seems that our ability to look after a child is diminished because we are men?

plupesype,

xxxxxxxx, 2617

Michelle Wilson, 3133 All laws should be equal, and we MUST put the children FIRST…

xxxxxxxx, 2850

xxxxxxxx, 4108 Why is it impossible (without many thousands spent on legal representation), to prove that DVO’s are totally against men, and indirectly against families too (children) even when it is stated in court that the facts of the order were not true or real?

steve, 4227 Parental Alienation is child abuse

richard pettit, 2316

Chris Savage, 4563 The Family and Federal Magistrates Courts are totally corrupt. They are an absolute disgrace and sponsor one of the most serious forms of child abuse – parental alienation.

Ben Bundy, 2540 How is the manipulation of children against their Father not seen as psycological abuse? How is it not picked up and why is it not acted on or ignored by social workers? Why do soicial workers see mothers by default as victims? Time for action by our government and law makers.

Charles, 44193, USA The family court of Australia, as well as that in the USA, are a disgrace and a mockery to true justice. But what the hell do they know about that?

Giuseppe Cutrale, 3500 There is no scientific evidence to support claims that a mother is more important to a child just a mindset and a mindset that needs to change for our children they are not weapons to aid in selfish acts of hate they are children who love there parents equally I have 5 children and 4 of which I have a shared care arrangement but for my youngest Daughter she has not seen myself or her brother or 3 sisters for 9 months easy to get an AVO or DVO in place with no proof how can a father just snap after 10 years of being a great dad I am and always will be the only father my children have I will always put there safety and well being above anything else but I will not stop until my daughter has her rights to see her family as we will also be getting our god given right to see her!

xxxxxxxx, 2046

Howard, UZFss0mkLTjW Males are human beings with rights just as women are. Stop this male hatred and destruction.

xxxxxxxx, 3178

Craig, 2487

james Dickenson,

Dr Greg Canning, 4812 Our children are suffering because of the gender biased and corrupt legal system and unaccountable family and federal magistrates courts. The divorce, family law and abuse industries extract billions of dollars to provide lucrative lifestyles for their practitioners at the expense of fathers and children.

Darren M, 5041 Expose the corrupt Family Court Judiciary. Hang and

fatima, 87300
hello, I have lost my father in Australian way who will help me to find him and either I can not continue my studies just help me as a humanity please

Katrina Hogan, 4164

Hagen Lunau, 2121
The revolution has begun. Time to drag the judges and politicians into the streets and punish them publicly.

Wayne Coles-Janess, 3000
How do we change this with no funds or influence?? Violence against Men and lack of proper procedures are ignored?

I have cared for our daughter since birth, while her mother placed her into “Childcare” the whole 50% of the time our daughter was in her mothers care for 5 years?

AUSTRALIA’S CORRUPT COURTS HATE CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN AND THEIR FATHERS

Not since the Big East Conference boasted three of the final four teams in NCAA Tournament play did we see such a lopsided outcome. It occurred over the weekend not far from all the sports arenas and domes in a competition we can call the Family Court Final Four. While visitation dads were obsessed with the orange ball, feministswere busy getting more laws passed to criminalize them as parents.

Here at Leon Koziol.com we try to keep up with all the developments that get by our fathers while they’re watching the games. We try to organize opposition to laws that are effectively criminalizing fatherhood and removing good dads from their children’s lives. But the guys seem to prefer spending on game tickets and other priorities than donations or participation in family law reform.

That’s why family judges today see no problem with debtor prisons and gender discrimination in parenting decisions. Fathers and their women supporters do not send them any public message that there’s a growing crisis here, so it’s simply not a problem. Oppressive laws continue to be passed which send good fathers to lower class status, bankruptcy and jail. Horrendous psychological damage to children is utterly disregarded along the way for the almighty dollar.

To cite only one example, a federal law known as the Parent Punishment Act (you can look it up, it really exists) makes it a crime to take up residency in another state with a $5,000 support debt. Now how many dads know that they can be arrested by getting behind on a debt so easily achieved after losing a job (or failing to get one that a well paid judge thinks he can get)? Move a few miles across a state line for a new job and go to federal prison? Rapists and child molesters get more respect, i.e.Attorney Steven Lever.

Despite crucial rights violated under our Constitution in this way, the war on fatherspresses on, right over the foxholes where guys focus only on their own war stories. There is no sacrifice for a greater cause and so there is no relief in sight. Politicians regurgitate that same old song and dance about how these measures are designed to benefit our children when they know of the real damage.

This is because a go-along mentality gets votes. Remarkably an uniformed public then applauds the erosion of our rights just as Adolph Hitler once predicted in Nazi Germany. Just say it’s for our children, and the people will “happily accept any curtailment of their liberties.” It’s all there in Mein Kampf, and it’s been happening here in the states for many years.

The real crimes lie in a widespread suppression of speech and reform which then facilitates the ongoing discrimination, abuse and injustices. While this fatherless crisis grows, politicians simply demand more tax dollars to pay for the social costs. It’s called job creation after all our real jobs went overseas to avoid other forms of over-regulation. In short, government is spending our money to create a problem and then making us pay for it on the back side.

Our Constitution is the supreme embodiment of law that our soldiers sacrifice everything for each day only to return home to these same prisons and oppressive laws. In our next post, we’ll tell you about a quiet scheme which gets even more child support in the hands of lawyers and how desperate victims have now resorted to murder, suicide and lawlessness as a preferred remedy to such injustices. In the meantime, enjoy the games.

Strong fatherly involvement in their early life can also improve a child’s future career prospects, the research shows.

Academics at the University of Newcastle, who carried out the study, also found that men tended to pay more attention to their sons than their daughters.

The researchers warned that it was not enough for parents to live together, but that a father should be actively involved in a child’s life to benefit their development.

The study looked at more than 11,000 British men and women, born in 1958.

The scientists asked their mothers how often the father of their child took part in activities with them, including reading, organising outings and general “quality time”.

The findings, published in the journal Evolution and Human Behaviour, show that those children whose fathers spent more time with them had a higher IQ and were more socially mobile than those who had received little attention.

The differences were still detectable by the age of 42.

Dr Daniel Nettle, who led the research, said: “What was surprising about this research was the real sizeable difference in the progress of children who benefited from paternal interest and how thirty years later, people whose dads were involved are more upwardly mobile.

“The data suggest that having a second adult involved during childhood produces benefits in terms of skills and abilities that endure throughout adult life,” he added.

Jon Davies, chief executive for Families Need Fathers, said: “We hope that research like this will lead to the government to reconsider how poorly served separated families often are and how a child needs a father as well as mother.”

LAST month a NSW Police Facebook post talked about male victims of family violence and the fact that last year one in five domestic violence assaults that NSW police attended to involved male victims.

This is not news for many of us who have worked for many years to advocate for rights for male domestic violence victims and for services to be provided for them and also female perpetrators

Both of these groups – male victims and female perpetrators – are “invisible” in the eyes of the domestic violence field in this country.

Male victims need to be encouraged to come forward, and they need as much support as female and child victims of family violence, and the NSW Police Facebook post we hope will help to facilitate this.

The fact that women are victims of domestic violence in 66per cent of the cases needs to be addressed and is being addressed, but what about the other 33per cent?

There has been no community education censuring violence by women or raising awareness of the needs of male domestic violence victims.

I run the only training program for health and community workers in how to respond to the needs of male victims in Australia and New Zealand.

There are hundreds of training courses in Australia around domestic violence but none of them deal with the two “invisible” groups, they simply help to perpetrate the myth that domestic violence is something that only happens to women at the hands of men.

Domestic violence can be thought of as an equal opportunity killer.

Recent tragedies in Brisbane and Cairns involving women killing their children show that women are just as capable of homicide as men when children are involved.

The latest statistics from the Australian Institute of Criminology show that between 2008 and 2010, in family-related murders of children by all family members, more than 37per cent of the known killers were the mother. (The source is raw data from the AIC’s National Homicide Monitoring Program at oneinthree.com.au/storage/xls/Family_Violence_Homicides_2008-10_NHMP.xlsx)

It is indeed sad that while our community awareness of the dangers of domestic violence is growing, the information is not being presented fairly and the truth about who might actually commit violence and abuse in relationships is not being accurately portrayed.

Dr Elizabeth Celi, a psychologist and author on men’s health, has some interesting insights.

She says public awareness of domestic violence often falls short of portraying the whole story.

‘‘Decades of rightly raising public awareness for female victims of domestic violence, have simultaneously lacked in accurate public education that women can also be abusive and violent, towards other women, men and children,’’ she says.

She also points out that turning a blind eye to women who commit domestic violence puts children at risk.

‘‘Children are affected by abusive and violent behaviour regardless of the perpetrator’s gender. Our children don’t deserve to be put at risk by overlooking women’s abuse and violence.’’

It is time that we called for a stop to all domestic violence, irrespective of who commits it and who is the victim.

In the real war to stop all violence in relationships, there is no place for gender battles; we need to move on from this and work towards making all men, women and children safe.

Greg Millan is a men’s health consultant. He will run a training program for health workers ‘‘Working with men affected by violence” in Newcastle on February 20.

Relationships can be an emotional rollercoaster. Throughout the ride, men and women can be everything from loving and nurturing, to sometimes verbally and even physically abusive during fights. While aggression in heterosexual relationships is believed to stem from men, a recent study presented on June 25 at a symposium on intimate partner violence (IPV) at the British Psychological Society’s Division of Forensic Psychology annual conference in Glasgow, found women are more likely to be “intimate terrorists,” or physically aggressive to their partners than men.

Michael P. Johnson, an American sociologist coined the term “intimate terrorism,” or batterers or abusers, in the 1990s to define an extreme form of controlling relationship behavior involving threats, intimidation, and violence. Men were almost always responsible for these heinous acts. This belief is further supported by statistics highlighting nearly three in 10 women (29 percent), and one in 10 men (10 percent) in the U.S. have experienced rape, physical violence, and/or stalking by a partner, affecting some form of their functioning, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

To observe the dynamic and prevalence of intimate partner violence of men and women in heterosexual relationships, Dr. Elizabeth Bates from the University of Cumbria and colleagues from the University of Central Lancashire, conducted a survey collecting data from a large cohort of students. More than 1,000 students — 706 women and 398 men with an average age of 24 — responded to the questionnaires. The students were asked about their physical aggression and controlling behavior to partners, and to same-sex others, including friends.

The findings revealed just as many women as men could also be classed as abusive, coupled with controlling behavior with serious levels of threats, intimidation, and physical violence. Women were more likely to verbally and physically aggressive to their partners than men. “This study found that women demonstrated a desire to control their partners and were more likely to use physical aggression than men. “It wasn’t just pushing and shoving,” said Bates,Medical Xpress reported. Some of the survey respondents circled boxes for things like beating up, kicking, and even threatening to use a weapon.

However, when it came to terms of high levels of control and aggression, there was no difference between men and women. There was a higher prevalence of controlling behavior seen in women than men, which was found to significantly predict physical aggression in both sexes. In other words, the more controlling behavior a woman displayed, the more likely she would an “intimate terrorist,” or physically aggressive to her partner.

“This was an interesting finding. Previous studies have sought to explain male violence towards women as rising from patriarchal values, which motivate men to seek to control women’s behavior, using violence if necessary,” Bates said. This suggests IPV may not be motivated by patriarchal values, and should be further studied with other forms of aggression. The stereotypical popular view, although still dominant, is being challenged by research over the last ten to 15 years, shedding light on male domestic violence.

Mark Brooks, chair of the ManKind Initiative in the U.K., which offers support for male victims of domestic violence, believes Bates’ study is “game changing.” “At the charity we’re not surprised at the findings, because of the type of calls we get to our helpline every day,” Brooks told The Telegraph. “What concerns us still is the lack of awareness and services available to support those men suffering in this way.”

It is no surprise that the media and government in the U.S. and throughout other parts of the world, people focus most attention on the female victims of domestic violence and, consequently, men are the overlooked victims of domestic violence. According to the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, men and boys are less likely to report the violence and seek services due to several challenges such as the stigma of being a male victim. Sixteen percent of adult men who report being raped or physically assaulted are victims of a current or former spouse, cohabitating partner, boyfriend/girlfriend, or date.

Source: Bates E et al. Women more likely to be aggressive than men in relationships. British Psychological Society’s Division of Forensic Psychology annual conference in Glasgow.

King John exploited and abused the traditional sources of revenue. Desperate for money to wage wars in defence of his estates, John demanded unprecedented amounts in ‘scutage’, or money from his tenants in lieu of providing knights for the king’s service. He was intemperate and at times cruel in his manner of enforcing his rights from his land-holders and from the church, and unjust in his treatment of people at all levels. There was no redress against the absolute power of the king.

Barons who resisted paying the excessive levies had their lands confiscated and members of their families taken as hostages. By 1215 rebel barons outnumbered those loyal to John. They united and marched on London from the north and captured the Tower of London on 17 May 1215.

I have proven false allegations of DV, proven corruption in Queensland Government, have court orders for my 5yo to see me every week, I have been in family corrupt court for 5 years, legal aid Queensland has blocked contact for over 2 years. I am still waiting new orders from August 2014 trial.

Voting LNP ALP Axis of Evil is Voting for child Abuse from Trafficking

Would be good if you will write to your state and federal members as this is their job to do my son has been denied his inalienable rights and free liberties by corruption in our government to see and be with us.

Breaches of law FAMILY LAW ACT 1975 – SECT 4AB (i) preventing the family member from making or keeping connections with his or her family, friends or culture;

We need to get Tough on public service crime and corruption, we are very much under attack, we need leadership.

My Surfers Paradise State and Fed LNP reps got me on charges s474.17 a fed indictment from an email on my sons 5th birthday, in defense of my young son, I’m getting a summary trial, no legal aid, no legal rep, no jury, 3 years prison.

CRIMES ACT 1914 – SECT 4G

Indictable offences

Offences against a law of the Commonwealth punishable by imprisonment for a period exceeding 12 months are indictable offences, unless the contrary intention appears.

CRIMINAL CODE ACT 1995 –

10.4 Self-defence

(1) A person is not criminally responsible for an offence if he or she carries out the conduct constituting the offence in self-defence.

The trial on indictment of any offence against any law of the Commonwealth

, and subsequent private prosecution of systemic corruption and child abuse under the Australian family law act.

The Parliament and government are linked in the relationship known as ‘responsible government’, which was described earlier. For this reason, we consider them together. These are powerful institutions, which control the law-making process.

Potentially, they protect rights in two ways: positively, by passing laws to protect rights that are not currently protected and negatively, by restraining themselves from making laws to infringe rights that are recognized by the common law or international law.

CRIMES ACT 1914 – SECT 28 Interfering with political liberty Any person who, by violence or by threats or intimidation of any kind, hinders or interferes with the free exercise or performance, by any other person, of any political right or duty, shall be guilty of an offence.

Penalty: Imprisonment for 3 years.

A person is incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a Member if he or she has been convicted of bribery, undue influence or interference with political liberty, or has been found by the Court of Disputed Returns to have committed or attempted to commit bribery or undue influence when a candidate, disqualification being for two years from the date of the conviction or finding..

Unfortunately it will get worse, our public services attract antisocial types, sociopaths, psychopaths, pedophiles, narcissus like flies. Question is how do we fix it, given our public service is working against us.

We need to organise real people to take up parliamentary seats. candidates, independents or otherwise.

Here attached is good reading to begin 2015 with thanks to Lone Fathers Association Australia for the great job they do in producing a great newsletter. Note the branches listed and get along and give force to change in 2015 or if no branch is in your area get one started and contact Barry Williams to help you get another branch up and running. Not only for the duration of your own case but for years after like me now over 15 years and still driving for the equality of fathers out of Government Administration.

http://lonefathers.org.au/

Here’s an easy start of something very positive right now offsetting feminist propaganda about domestic violence.

Read Bliney Dan on page 21 and read Professor Patrick Parkinson Report on false allegations attached here. Run off a few copies of his research he submitted to The Senate and get an appointment with your nearest Station Sergeant and explain to them how false allegations leave harm upon the father falsely accused and that false allegation can be prosecuted by police under the Police Administration Act for also being a waste of Taxpayers Resources especially under budget cuts. If it still goes to court as a false allegation it then comes under the Criminal Code Act for the misuse of courts and the penalty for the false claimant is the same as what they were trying .to have falsely imposed. A false report is a serious legal matter not being properly handled by police. Run off the ABS stats too for police. They are GOVERNMENTS OWN STATISTICS that police should be heeding as the status quo.

And that Police must by way of their Oath of Office abandon their long ago adopted and unlawful feminists solely male blame Duluth Model of administering Domestic Violence.

Come on now and make 2015 a year of being proactive restoring truth and gender equality in these heterosexual administrations. The feminists are doing it all of the time surely fathers can find some time to counterbalance their propaganda with the likes of Professor Parkinson’s Research. Professor Parkinson is a professor of law with as specialization in family law at NSW University email patrick.parkinsion@sydney.edu.au

Regards

Robert K

Phone 08 8932 333908 8932 3339

Reading View. Alt Shift A for Accessibility Help.

False Allegations of Abuse – Submission by Prof. Parkinson to Senate

Excerpt of submission to the Senate Committee: There is now a very widespread view in the community that some family violence orders are sought for tactical or collateral reasons to do with family law disputes. People have become very cynical about them. A national survey conducted in 2009, with over 12,500 respondents, found that 49% of respondents agreed with the proposition that ‘women going through custody battles often make up or exaggerate claims of domestic violence in order to improve their case’, and only 28% disagreed. While it might be expected that men would be inclined to believe this, 42% of women did so as well. The view that some family violence order applications are unjustified appears to be shared by state magistrates in New South Wales and Queensland. Hickey and Cumines in a survey of 68 NSW magistrates concerning apprehended violence orders (AVOs) found that 90% agreed that some AVOs were sought as a tactic to aid their case in order to deprive a former partner of contact with the children. About a third of those who thought AVOs were used tactically indicated that it did not occur ‘often’, but one in six believed it occurred ‘all the time’. A similar survey of 38 Queensland magistrates found that 74% agreed with the proposition that protection orders are used in Family Court proceedings as a tactic to aid a parent’s case and to deprive their partner of contact with their children.

90% of surveyed NSW Magistrates agreed that AVOs were sometimes or often sought as a tactic in order to deprive a former partner of contact with the children.

In research that our research team recently published on the views of 40 family lawyers in NSW, almost all solicitors thought that tactical applications for AVOs occurred, with the majority considering it happened often. In another study based upon interviews with 181 parents who have been involved in family law disputes, we found a strong perception from respondents to family violence orders (both women and men) that their former partners sought a family violence order in order to help win their family law case. This is a quote from one of the women in our study. Her former husband, who we also interviewed, sought an apprehended violence order (AVO) to keep her away from the house after she had left it.

A survey of 38 Queensland magistrates found that 74% agreed with the proposition that protection orders are used in Family Court proceedings as a tactic to aid a parent’s case and to deprive their partner of contact with their children.

She said this: “I thought this is ridiculous. What’s he giving me an AVO for? I haven’t done anything to him. I haven’t hit him, kicked him. We never had any violence in our marriage. Why have I got an AVO? … you can put an AVO on someone and say that they’re violent, and the only way you can get a child off their mother is because they’re violent. And that’s why I think he gave me the AVO.” The belief that family violence orders are a weapon in the war between parents is fuelled by the fact that judges are required under the Family Law Act to consider such family violence orders in determining the best interests of the child. The proposed clause in this Bill takes the law back to what it was before 2006, without any explanation for why Parliament should reverse its previous decision at least to limit the provision. It really doesn’t matter whether this belief that family violence orders are used tactically is true or not. The fact is that the perception is out there and it is held by state magistrates and family lawyers, as well as the wider community. The retention of this provision in the Family Law Act simply fuels the suspicion that family violence orders are being misused. This is damaging to the credibility of the family violence order system and the courts.The second reason why the requirement to consider family violence orders ought to be removed is that this serves absolutely no purpose. Yes, the court needs to know about the existence of a current family violence order in order to consider how to frame its own orders (s.60CG), but that is dealt with by requiring people to inform the court of such orders (s.60CF). Why consider them again in deciding what is in the best interests of a child (s.60CC(3))? The court is already required to consider the history of violence. What does it add to require the court also to consider a family violence order? The impression given by the legislation is that these orders are somehow evidence that there has been violence. However, that is a misunderstanding.

In research that our research team recently published on the views of 40 family lawyers in NSW, almost all solicitors thought that tactical applications for AVOs occurred, with the majority considering it happened often.

Family violence orders have absolutely no evidential value in the vast majority of cases. This is because, in the vast majority of cases, they are consented to without admissions. The hearings in these uncontested cases are very brief indeed. Prof. Rosemary Hunter, in observations in Victoria in 1996–97, found that the median hearing time for each application was only about three minutes. Applications were typically dealt with in a bureaucratic manner, with magistrates being distant and emotionally disengaged. To the extent that applicants were asked to give oral evidence, they were typically asked to confirm the content of their written application, and very little exploration of the grounds for the application took place. Dr Jane Wangmann, in a recent analysis of court files in NSW, reached finding very similar to Hunter’s. In her observations of AVO matters in 2006–7, she found, like Hunter, that cases were dealt with in three minutes or less. She also noted that the information provided in written complaints was brief and sometimes vague. It is hardly surprising, then, that judges in family law cases draw no inferences from the mere existence of a family violence order. This has been the clear view of family lawyers for the last 15 years. Indeed, in the research we recently published on the views of 40 family lawyers in NSW, none of the lawyers who responded to the question believed that judicial officers gave AVOs much consideration in determining parenting disputes. Judges, they indicate, want to evaluate the evidence of violence itself, not the fact that another court has made an order about it by consent and without admissions. https://senate.aph.gov.au/submissions/comittees/viewdocument.aspx?id=f6c1e09d-3367-4ed1-b0da-aed26481ea59 Family Law Legislation Amendment (Family Violence) Bill 2011 Submission to Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs by Prof. Patrick Parkinson, University of Sydney

In an historic first for Australia, Prerogative Writs of Mandamus were served in the High Court in Canberra at about 3.48 pm this afternoon pertaining to the illegal “corporations” that have been formed, and are being operated under the “Commonwealth of Australia” ABN122 104 616 and the America Securities Exchange Commission No. 000 080 5157, and commanding that this fraudulent “corporation,” and all of the fraudulent subsidiary “companies” – being those in each of the States – be dissolved. Queenslanders will no doubt be familiar with the “Brigalow Corporation,” brought to the attention of the people some years ago by Sue Maynes in New South Wales, Brian Shaw in Victoria, Wayne Glew et al in Western Australia, as well as many other good and hard-working people for the cause in many other States.

This action will have repercussions throughout Australia, and around the world, and result in the formation of the King’s Bench, which may result in the dissolution of all of the governments – State and Federal – as they are all guilty of fraud – and possibly the arrest and jailing of a number of people – politicians, government “advisers” and lackeys, judges, and many others. The list is already quite extensive, including former politicians and Prime Ministers, Premiers, on and on it goes! As we said in a previous issue of the Voice, “Runnymede, here we come again!”

This is the result of people realising their sovereign rights under the Australian Consitution Act 1901, sections 1 to 128, Section 61 of Magna Carta 1215/1297, and the Statute of Monopolities 1623-4, where there has been a number of frauds of gigantic proportions perpetrated on the sovereign people of Australia.

We congratulate people like Sue Maynes and many others, who have toiled for years to try to get something done about the situation. We have waited and waited for someone to act, hoping someone would, and having waited for years, with nothing happening, we decided to do it ourselves. Together, we quietly formed an alliance with other hard working sovereign people from other States, issued the writs this week in the High Court, serving them this afternoon. It was a tremendous rush, to get them in to the High Court before they close tomorrow for the year, and we sincerely thank all those who gave their all to get them sent in time for issuing this afternoon in the High Court in Canberra..

A US-based men’s rights group has purchased a similar domain name to promote its own cause. The URL whiteribbon.org directs to a website that looks very similar to whiteribbon.org.australia, but is run by a group calling itself ‘A Voice for Men’.

It also uses the name ‘White Ribbon’, but claims to be raising awareness about domestic abuse as a non-gendered issue, highlighting men also as victims and the effects on children.

The “copycat” website claimed that violence against women was an exaggerated myth at the cost of men.

The group claimed on its website that the idea of a female victim of domestic violence was manufactured, accusing universities and researches on domestic violence prevention of man hating.

National Executive Engagement Officer for White Ribbon Australia, Fayssal Sari, told SBS the group was using deceitful tactics to mislead people who had genuine concerns for victims of domestic violence.

AUSTRALIAN DEMOCRACY ONLINE PARTY, DEMOCRACY 2.0 THE UPGRADE Only together we can over run the ALP LNP Cults with our own direct democratic party, to make the changes we want and need for our children and our children’s children.

Change won’t happen unless we make it happen, we have to do it together as one, unless we do we will relive history.

Point is laws are only any good if they protect us and our rights, freedoms and liberties, laws are only good if they are upheld at all times equally.

It is obvious to most that the government and pathetic judiciary, our employees do not up hold the law nor the spirit of the law, because they hold us in contempt and this is why we are here to be a political force to deal with them, because they believe we work for them, and in reality we do, we work and pay them tax an they hold us in contempt..