Comments

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.bizzyblog.com/2013/02/13/politicos-thrush-refers-to-obamas-sotu-spending-proposals-without-mentioning-his-claim-that-they-wont-increase-deficit/trackback/

Well, at least he didn’t rake over the SCOTUS this time…

Obama has clearly adopted the Biden strategy of prattling a false liberal assertion every ten seconds to overwhelm any note takers on responding. It takes ten minutes of context to expose a liberal false assertion for what it is, in the mean time Obama has made 100 more falsehoods and emotional pleas.

The STOU speech can be summed up as yet another Biden prattle fest where nothing believable was said.

I mean come on, the first minute of Obama taking he claimed the economy was doing good…6 million more people were working…we are using less fuel than ever before…importing less oil… ALL of these are HALF truths, thus falsehoods.

- 6 million part time workers in lieu of full timers? That’s a good thing?
-using less fuel due to depressed economic activity is not a valid policy, is it?
-importing less oil due to a depressed economy and virtually opposing every effort to produce more domestically is not because of Obama but in spite of him.

100s of thousands of people working full time jobs are going to loose their employer sponsored healthcare benefits due to ObamaCare by June. Most will be counted lucky IF they get to keep a part time job of under 30 hours. But that’s a positive? Whom is he kidding?

In 2014 at least 40 million people are going to pay the ObamaCare TAX for not having health insurance because the $20,000 larded up plan is beyond even middle class families at a median income of $50,000/yr. But the future is bright????? Someone is taking some happy pills or believes the American people are really that stupid.

Elections have consequences and, NO, all politicians are NOT the same.

The President does a big “woe is me” over the $1.2 trillion sequester that he endorsed and signed into law. Some Republicans are joining him. Few people understand that the sequester doesn’t even cut any spending. It just slows the rate of growth. Even with the sequester, government will grow over $7 trillion over the next decade.

Only in Washington could an increase of $7 trillion in spending over a decade be called a cut…

…Liberals complain that the budget can’t be balanced but if you cut just one penny from each dollar we currently spend, the budget would balance within six or seven years.

In other words, the entire caterwauling over the sequester is liberals screaming the end is nye because government WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO GROW AS MUCH AS BEFORE. We have a spending problem not a revenue problem.