Saturday, 29 January 2011

It is absolutely necessary that the good are strong or they are nothing at all. The weak cannot be good, only cowardly, hypocritical and ultimately evil. We will be great when we are good, but when we cease being good we also cease to be great. The British are no longer good, for the men now think and behave like women. Who will protect the men when they become women? Not the women.

Friday, 28 January 2011

"Far too many people are treating these sorts of episodes as a free speech issues without examining the nature of the censorship and substantive content of what is being suppressed. But episodes like this will continue to happen unless the men of society say: "We reject feminism and anti-discimination on principle. We have a right to *be* ourselves and to express normal attitudes. And by the way, we don’t want lineswomen because it changes the feel and character of the match in a way that doesn’t suit us.

That would be what self-respecting menfolk would say which is why Englishmen won’t say it. Claire is right that the modern white Western male is a limp-dicked disgrace who over the past 5 decades has abdicated his leadership role in society. Only a thoroughly degenerate menfolk would tolerate anti-sexist speech policing and anti-male employment quotas."

Lucas Jervasi:

"The problem is mainly with white men Claire. It’s that we’re suckers. For the past few decades we have liked to pretend that the agenda of multicultural/feminist liberalism was mainly about “social justice” when in reality it was mostly about power and humiliation. The intention of feminism and multiculturalism was not to make the sexes or races equal but to reverse the relation between them. The proof is that when men or whites do better, this is asserted to be proof of “discrimination” and urgent action is needed for "equality"; when women or ethnic minorities do better, there's no problem! they’re even encouraged to exploit their gain at the expense of white males as this Guardian article illustrates:http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2007/apr/08/discriminationatwork.raceintheukWe have been complicit in elevating other groups to our extreme detriment and are now the ones who are most dispossessed and oppressed. Our behaviour has been uniquely abnormal and I think most of us are too embarrassed to admit it!"

If white middle class men are now already so useless and stupid, think what they will be like when our daughters grow up.

If we convert to Islam now - which appears to be the only way out of this filth for us now - and reject the degraded and degenerate male spawn of liberal parents, those of us who have daughters might just have a chance of having legitimate grandchildren with parents who stay married to each other.

Worth a try anyway, or worth talking about weakly, perhaps, while our funeral pyre is being prepared ...

I wonder how many people get it that the problem with Western civilisation is not so much immigration or even Islam, but women, who now have too much power and who now think up fresh thoughtcrimes and who "man" The Thought Police.

It is now a crime for men to say anything that might offend women, even in private.

The sad sad thing is that so many Left Liberal men are acquiescing with this view and see no wrong in this.

Can Britain be rescued from its matriarchal doom when even its men behave and think like women?

Monday, 24 January 2011

It is probably a ploy to provoke men into saying something sexist and then forcing them to eat shit after being caught doing so.
I just don't like seeing fucking female linesmen on the pitch. It just looks stupid and PC. And it causes trouble to men, as we have seen, and is completely unnecessary as well as looking fucking unattractive. So fuck them to fucking hell.

Since the result of such a strike would result in the end of the British as a people - apart from the Muslims of course - that ought to concentrate minds.

It is what I call MAD - mutually assured destruction.

There will be scabs and blackleg labour, of course, but men will just fuck and forget them.

The striking women and men would need to organise themselves locally.

Men who won't marry because they don't want to be taken to the cleaners and think they don't want to buy the cow when they can get milk in pints at their corner shop would form a group.

Women who won't have sex with a man unless they are husband material would also form a group.

They will both be circling each other eventually, once the men get tired of not having sex with a regular female partner loved enough to be their wife. The women would also eventually find decent men who want a good wife, and negotiations can then commence.

Gad, why even deny it? Is anyone denying that white girls ARE easy meat? Even white men or white women? Not on my Facebook page, and I have lots of BNP Facebook friends ...

If I were doing PR for Muslims, I would be issuing a press release declaring reassuringly:

"Asian British men regard white women with JUST AS MUCH respect as white British men. We are happy to discuss why white girls ARE easy meat and whatcan be done about it THE MOMENT white men are given permission by white women to do so."

Get your job because of your looks, lose the job because you have lost them.

Looks like BBC TV is going to be full of old crones reading the news and forecasting the weather in the years to come. When that happens no one will want to watch Crone TV and the BBC will lose influence and be held in hatred, ridicule and contempt as will Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland.

Tuesday, 11 January 2011

So what if sex predators from a Muslim background target easy meat white girls?

Aren't you being a bit racist if you say you would rather your daughter be sexually exploited and violated by the Friendly Neighbourhood Sex Predator rather than the Alien Immigrant Sex Predator?

If men know there are sex predators of whatever race prowling around, shouldn't you be taking more care of your women?

Oh, but they can't because the slut and slapper single mums of these white girls don't care about their daughters, and never bothered to marry their fathers in the first place.

Sex predators know that if the stupid slag has no dad, they can pretty much do anything with her.

Probably, if these easy meat white girls stayed home they would be sexually exploited by mum's latest paedo boyfriend.

Is the government discussing this? Is it hell! Easier to blame Asian men for thinking what everybody thinks anyway - including white men - that white girls ARE easy meat.

EASY MEAT WHITE GIRLS TO BLAME FOR THE HATRED, RIDICULE AND CONTEMPT WHITE PEOPLE ARE NOW HELD IN.

STUPID SKINT SCARED WHITE MEN TOO SCARED TO SAY OR DO ANYTHING ABOUT THEIR EASY MEAT WHITE WOMEN, NOT EVEN THE BNP.

THEY ARE LIKE A DRUNK KNOWING THAT DRINK HAS DEGRADED THEM AND DESTROYED THEIR LIVES AND RELATIONSHIPS, BUT UNABLE TO GIVE IT UP.

Fact No 1: DEPRAVED WHITE MEN WANT WHITE WOMEN TO STAY EASY MEAT. (Otherwise, they wouldn't be getting any "action".)

Fact No 2:White men can't no longer afford to pay for their women because the state discriminates against them so much by allowing women to compete unfairly against them that the only way they can get any sex is to hope that their women stay cheap and easy.

Fact No 3:White men are now too stupid, skint and scared to say anything about the demented liberal matriarchy because they are mostly drunk, drugged, porn-addicted or scared of their wives divorcing them, taking half their stuff and depriving them of their children.

Fact No 4:

There are too many fucking single mums with the vote. All male politicians do when there is a general election is suck up to Woman's Hour or Mumsnet, prostrate themselves in their underwear and suck their stilettos in the most slavish and servile manner.

Monday, 10 January 2011

Well, they are, aren't they, if they copulate with anyone, anytime, anywhere, as they have been taught in their sex ed classes and allowed to by their mostly single parents in Paedo Bastard Slutland Britan?

Sunday, 9 January 2011

The most the panelists on BROADCASTING HOUSE can do to discuss the subject of the "easy meatiness" of white girls is to talk about "absent fathers".

Obviously, they can't bring themselves to make the link between female promiscuity and feminism.

Clearly, they are afraid to call bad (usually single) mothers bad mothers and sluts and slappers sluts and slappers.

Again, the very presence of Muslims is very helpful in pulling forward the Sacred Cow (the British Deity of the Slut and Slapper Single Mum with Variously-Fathered Feral Children that the sex mad British with their dicks hanging out of their low-slung trousers and their fannies hanging out of their micro-minis worship) as a candidate to be slayed as soon as possible in the interests of the British Nation, because it is eating them out of house and home and crapping all over their carpet.

Eventually, the penny will drop, even with this generation of dumbed-down limp-dicked tosspot sex-obsessed knicker-dropping bastard single parent Brits.

An Islam-based state religion is obviously required, since the Anglican Church has so very clearly failed to support family values with the institution of marriage. This is because the Anglican Church is now infested by mediocrities who subscribe to feminism, PC extremism and socialism. The now elderly traditionalists are all dying and retiring and there is no longer any life in that old banger of Christianity, which is the most unbelievable of all the Abrahamic faiths because of its doctrine of the Trinity.

Saturday, 8 January 2011

Racism = thinking someone has particular good qualities because of their race (eg white man rich, oriental women submissive, black men have larger penises and know how to use it better etc) and not bothering to make further proper enquiries.

Mark Collet's response to my Facebook status update: "Will the BNP have an honest discussion about the morals of their own women or continue to blame Muslims for all the ills of society?" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Collett

"You raise an interesting point Claire, and one I have myself raised elsewhere today. Muslim men don't just target white girls, they were doing the same to girls of African ancestry and mixed race parentage in Birmingham. The reason they don't do it to Asian or Muslim girls is because those girls actually have respect for their parents are at home in the evening like 12 year old girls should be. The problem here lies as much with bad parenting as it does with sexual predators. Parents today who let their 12-14 year old daughters out to roam the streets until past 10pm every night of the week have lost control of their children. It's awful what has happened to the girls invovled, but parents who let their children do as they please are putting their children at risk. Bad parenting puts children at risk of this kind of thing happening - regardless of the colour or religion of the perpetrator."

I then said:

"If one is a sex predator, one would look for the "easy meat" regardless of their race.

The hardest to get at would be the ones who have stay-at-home mothers who expect their daughters to be back by a certain time and perhaps fathers who say to them "You're not going out dressed like that, are you?"

The easiest meat would be fatherless schoolgirls or girls in care whose mothers and carers think nothing of letting them wander the streets in revealing clothing."

And Mark Collett said:

"Well in any good family young girls like this would be at home in the evening, having a meal, doing their homework and watching a bit of TV. These parents who allow these girls to roam the streets at all hours of the day and night are irresponsible and are putting their children at risk. When this issue first came to light at the time of the C4 documentary in Keighley, there were parents who claimed their children were being abused, but every night when a car load of men came to pick up their girls the parents would sit and do nothing."

I am conducting an informal survey on which stance you think would stand the party in better stead in the minds of the voting public.

The usual exchange of services between man and woman is that of punter and prostitute. That is why love is needed to sanctify such a bargain, which would be an insufferable imposition if not undertaken willingly or undertaken reluctantly.

Thursday, 6 January 2011

I find Medea a fascinating character. I doubt if she would have gone down in history quite as vividly if she hadn't killed her children to have her revenge on her husband. This is what many husbands do to their wife and children, by the way, when they realise their wives are about to leave them for another man, and taking the children with them.

Did anyone see Diana Rigg in that chilling Euripides play? She didn't do it on impulse but spent the whole play agonising about it. "Shall I or shan't I? Should I or shouldn't I have my revenge ?"

Logically, if her purpose was to have her revenge then there was no better way of doing so.

For her, in her unique position, killing her children would add to her immortality rather than diminish it.

For us ordinary folk, killing our healthy children would mean we have frustrated our own project of passing on our genes.

Monday, 3 January 2011

It seems the same old female voices keep popping up to complain every time I make general points to assist us in discovering the cause of our national malaise. (I say it is female promiscuity, and the widespread tolerance of single mummery and illegitimacy.)

Generalisations are generally true, ladies. Can you get your pink and fluffy heads round this concept? Do try anyway.
It is usually the women who squeal, "You nasty person! You're hurting my feelings!" about the offence I have caused when I discuss single motherhood and illegitimacy, which is spreading through British society like gangrene or cancer, who cannot take robust debate and want to shut people up.

That is why they should leave politics and return to the kitchen to nurse their injured feelings. When they eventually get over the trauma of having their feelings hurt and their behaviour and morality questioned, perhaps they can start bringing up their children properly, even if they have abandoned, divorced, lost or mislaid their husbands, especially the ones who neglected to even acquire one before having their illegitimate children.

Saturday, 1 January 2011

I am thinking about my female friends and their sheer inability to enjoy robust debate without descending into rancour and bitchy grudge-bearing pettiness. I really think that women's brains are actually different from men's. I guess they haveto be to make them fit for child-rearing, but if that is true - and it obviously is - then this must mean they are not equal to men, just complementary.

It's all a division of labour thing.

Feminism is the equivalent of treating a university professor and a gardener the same and expecting them to do the same thing.

Compelling men and women to do each other's work just means the work of neither will be done well, to the long-term detriment of the nation.

Feminists boast of the feminine ability to multi-task, but a Jacqueline of All Trades is Mistress of None.