Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on January
18th 2010. For newcomers to the show, I suggest you look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com
web site. Bookmark all the sites I have up there for future use because
sometimes the main site goes down. The official sites are: [listed
above]. As always, at the start of the show I mention that you bring me
to you… YOU are the listeners, you the audience. I’m not backed by any
big foundation or any big company that’s selling products and so on. The
ads on the show that you hear are paid directly by the advertisers straight to
RBN. That pays for the air time, their staff and equipment and their
bills. So it’s up to you as the listeners to keep me going. You can
do so by going into cuttingthroughthematrix.com
web site, see the books, CDs and DVDs I have for sale or you can donate to
me. You’ll find out how to do it on the web sites. [Ordering and
donation options listed above.] For those who get the disks burned of the
shows I do and passed to them to play on their CD players, you can get in touch
with me at [address above]. So that’s my tin can moment, as I rattle the
tin can for the pennies.

I
often don’t really pick the topics of the night’s show until the last moment
because there is so much to choose from. So much of it too, really, in a
sense, is trivia or irrelevant or it will simply get phased out by tomorrow’s
news. We are dished out so much news today you can’t keep up with it and
that’s part of the technique of data overload, as they call it.
With data overloads, it’s hard to retain what’s relevant and hard to even
remember what to toss OUT of your mind. Your mind can only hold so much
and it gets mixed with trivia and fiction until it’s all a fantasy. Some
people like the fantasy, they call them conspiracy theorists. That’s the
term that the intelligence services decided to GIVE the people at the bottom to
use upon themselves and a lot of them will do that. They’ll say, yep, I’m a conspiracy theorist and they
sound like a nutcase right away. The key is, you don’t have to guess
about things, as to where the world is going. You don’t have to guess
about why things are happening. You just have to read the old books
because they TOLD you where it was going a long time ago. Back with more
after this break.

Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. It’s
hard to choose topics to talk about today because we are bombarded with
them. Funny to think that in the 1960s, some of the big players who are
still going today, are still alive today and working very hard at this emerging
world society, although I think it’s long, long past here already, they talked
about this phase that we’d go through where we’d become involved in a
sort of world communication society. In other words, they were talking
about the internet that they were going to give us way back then, before
most of us had even tried a computer ourselves, or they had one for sale and
even universities were limited on the types that they had. But they knew
they were going to bring this in because they had got so advanced during the
whole Cold War with computers that they knew they could bring it in and make a collective society. They also
knew that people would become more ALIENATED
from each other during this particular phase as well. We could all
be on the NET so to speak, and yet we’d eventually be trained to talk to
voiceless entities across the world somewhere and never really meet
people. They thought that eventually we might not need the ability, we’d
lose the ability to actually communicate directly with other people.

When
you think about the effects of television, a lot of that was accomplished even
then when whole families would sit and stare at the google box and they
wouldn’t talk to each other. They were losing the ability to communicate
and interact with each other even then. Then back in the 70s and 80s as
more cash through credit cards was available, different members of the family
would go off into their own rooms to watch their own television set. That
further estranged them as well. The computer is doing much the same kind
of thing. As I say, it was all predicted an awful long time ago, before a
lot of people were born and long before they came up and told us that they were
going to give us this thing called the internet.

What
I’m truly saying is that we are living through an agenda. The world is
simply an agenda. It’s so interesting too, to read the big boys like
Brzezinski in his book, Between Two Ages, where he puts out the format
to the public, the reader, in the way that I call the ACCIDENTAL VIEW OF
HISTORY. Trends just appear, the way the RAND Corporation tends to do its
announcements in magazines. Trends appear and according to the trends,
they predict that we will be doing down the road and we’ll be doing this by the
year so and so and so and so. That’s the way that Brzezinski presented
his information and YET Brzezinski and the Council on Foreign Relations and the
Trilateral Commission had been working their whole lives, and people before
they were born too, were at it DIRECTING THE COURSE of the world and the course
of the cultures and the course of technology. So it’s so interesting to
see him give you the accidental view but never mention the fact that there were
big, big players and powerful organizations SHAPING the direction in which we
were told to go. Quite fascinating really.

We are supposed to believe in the accidental view. Things just happen by accident, governments
get up and try and fix things on the spur of the moment and that’s why it’s so
chaotic and that’s why they make mistakes, we’re told. Again, there is
nothing further from the truth. The further back you go, reading the
books written by the big players, the more evident it becomes that everything
that you’ve lived through was predicted by them because they were making
it all happen throughout your whole life and where it’s supposed to go, up to
the year 2050 and beyond.

Sometimes
they will call them futurists as well, the futurists who predict trends.
Like any world where they’ve trained, or any reality where they’ve trained the
public to follow EXPERTS – as Bertrand Russell said they would and they have –
they pick the supposed TOP futurists, the ones who will predict the winning
trends. They are the winners, they’re always right. Well, it’s not
because they’ve got good crystal balls or because they’ve got more of an acute
mental range or something. It’s because they are IN on the big plan, the
big agenda. There is an old saying they used to use in different
religions and they’d say, ‘make it so.’
Freemasonry still says that. Even Wicca, they say, ‘so mote it be.’ If you put up the
experts there who are putting out the trends, it becomes that way because
they’ve said it’s going to become that way. The big businesses listen
them and they get on board and they actually MAKE it happen. That’s how
you direct society. Plus big money is always available to make sure it
goes off in that direction.

In
the process, we go through many cons and scams to guide us into the new society
of a depopulated planet where children are not only irrelevant almost, they
really don’t want them. They really, really don’t like children and they
especially don’t like children from the middle and lower classes anymore.
Both classes have to go. The world that has been decided that’s to come
in eventually is for an elite with a technotronic class, the crème-de-la-crème
of the technotronic era will work for them and things will be robotic and
eventually even computers will be running operations for them in hospitals and
things like that. But they don’t need the massive manpower anymore.
They’re looking towards the future where sustainability, as they call it, really,
since these guys at the top are always terrified that they’ll die off
themselves if there is not enough food to go around, they plan to take down the
population first – take out your enemy instead – and make it safe for
themselves. In the meantime, WE MUST BE TAUGHT THAT WE ARE THE
PROBLEM.

WE
are the problem. WE are the consumers, WE are the problem. Well,
nothing is further from the truth. The same guys – as I say, many of them
are still alive today – promoted the consumer age. They promoted
it because they needed a strong West. They needed a strong United States
of America because they were supplying the tax money and the military force to
go across the whole world as the global policeman. Now that the job is
coming to a halt - they are right now attacking the last few countries left to
be dominated and to be standardized into this system - they will run out of
enemies and they won’t need the big military forces. They also know they
are going to take down the Western world at the same time as they are finishing
off the Middle East and Asia. That’s why the next part of the plan is to
bring the military home, a good part of it, integrate it completely and manage
the herd as we gradually get taken down the path to annihilation so the elite
might survive.

There’s
an old saying that used to be said, and still is said actually in some
religions. It said that the few
must perish for the sake of the many. In this case, it’s the many
that must perish for the sake of the few. That’s the big agenda.
I’m not kidding about it. They are very strong about this. They are
teaching children in school that children, their own offspring, will be
unnecessary. There are already volunteers coming out after massive
indoctrination at school, scientific indoctrination, and asking for
sterilization. That is part of the agenda.

All
meat is to be eliminated, meat consumption. Alvin Toffler, another big
futurist there, well funded by the big boys, wrote in his book The Third
Wave, that the future will be a
vegetarian society and it must be so, he said. He didn’t say why
it must be so; he just said it must be so. Now we’re getting articles in
the media, from the top again, about the need to stop eating all meat because
they say it’s too energy consumptive and they want to give you their GMO foods
instead… which are full of toxins and poisons and pesticides. That is not
what the elites eat of course. We’ll never get access to their
stuff. You could never afford it even if you were given the card to get
access.

As
everything happens there is always another reason for things happening, never
the way we are told. This odd thing with Haiti, people forget that the UN
has been in that country for years. Canada and the States and other
countries have been sending policemen in, with the blue berets for the United
Nations. The RCMP goes in there, from Canada, with blue berets.
They just never quite seem to get the Haitians to give up all their rights and
be dominated and allow all their resources – and there are resources around
there, still to be plundered – to give it all away to the big boys. So
bang, along comes the earthquake and do they send in massive relief with all
the organizations which they have up? No. What they do is they send
in the military, masses of military because they have announced that FIRST AND
FOREMOST that area of the Caribbean is necessary for the defense of the
United States of America, to have hegemony over it. That’s why
they’re sending all the troops in.

This
article is from Global Research.

The Militarization of Emergency Aid to Haiti:

Is it a Humanitarian Operation or an Invasion?

By Michel Chossudovsky / Global Research, January 15,
2010

Haiti has a
longstanding history of US military intervention and occupation going back to
the beginning of the 20th Century. US interventionism has contributed to the
destruction of Haiti's national economy and the impoverishment of its
population.

The devastating
earthquake is presented to World public opinion as the sole cause of the country's
predicament.

A country has been
destroyed, its infrastructure demolished. Its people precipitated into abysmal
poverty and despair.

Haiti's history, its
colonial past have been erased.

The US military has
come to the rescue of an impoverished Nation. What is its Mandate?

Is it a Humanitarian
Operation or an Invasion?

The main actors in
America's "humanitarian operation" are the Department of Defense, the
State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).
(See USAID Speeches: On-The-Record Briefing on the Situation in Haiti,
01/13/10). USAID has also been entrusted in channelling food aid to Haiti,
which is distributed by the World Food Program. (See USAID Press
Release: USAID to Provide Emergency Food Aid for Haiti Earthquake Victims,
January 13, 2010) (Alan: I’m going to talk more about the World
Food Program when I come back from this break.)

Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an
article from Global Research to do with Haiti and the emergency aid that’s
supposedly going in there right now. It’s a massive military invasion
when you look at it from another point of view. It talks about how the
USAID has been entrusted to channel food aid to Haiti, which is distributed by
the World Food Program.

The
World Food Program is a very interesting program to go into. It’s tied in
with the World Agricultural agency at the United Nations because in their
mandate when they set up the different parts of the UN, they were set up to be
eventually parts of a global structure. That department for agriculture
was to be responsible, down the road – which might not be too far – to
distribute ALL food to ALL regions; they’ve got the world broken up into
regions and that includes the Americas as well, one day. They said at the
time, when they set it up, that they will
give a set amount of food to every region and you must keep your population
down below a certain level because they won’t increase the food.
So it’s interesting to see TRAIL runs, in a sense, always being used by the
United Nations. That’s what they are, trial runs.

The military
component of the US mission, however, tends to overshadow the civilian
functions of rescuing a desperate and impoverished population. The overall
humanitarian operation is not being led by civilian governmental agencies such
as FEMA or USAID, but by the Pentagon.

The dominant
decision making role has been entrusted to US Southern Command (SOUTHCOM).

A massive deployment
of military hardware and personnel is contemplated. The Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen has confirmed that the US will be sending nine
to ten thousand troops to Haiti, including 2000 marines. (American Forces
Press Service, January 14, 2010)

Aircraft carrier,
USS Carl Vinson and its complement of supporting ships has already arrived in
Port au Prince. (January 15, 2010). The 2,000-member Marine Amphibious
Unit as well as and soldiers from the U.S. Army's 82nd Airborne division
"are trained in a wide variety of missions including security and
riot-control in addition to humanitarian tasks." (A:
Do you ever get the impression it’s going to come back home
eventually? That’s what it is. It’s a training exercise too.)

In contrast to
rescue and relief teams dispatched by various civilian organizations, the
humanitarian mandate of the US military is not clearly defined:

“Marines
are definitely warriors first, and that is what the world knows the Marines
for,... [but] we’re equally as compassionate when we need to be, and this is a
role that we’d like to show -- that compassionate warrior, (A:
That’s kind of contradictory.) reaching out with a helping hand for those
who need it. We are very excited about this.” (Marines' Spokesman, (A:
Remember, that’s Public Relations when you have a spokesman.) Marines
Embark on Haiti Response Mission, Army Forces Press Services, January 14, 2010)

While presidents
Obama and Préval spoke on the phone, there were no reports of negotiations
between the two governments regarding the entry and deployment of US troops on
Haitian soil. The decision was taken and imposed unilaterally by Washington.
The total lack of a functioning government in Haiti was used to legitimize, on
humanitarian grounds, the sending in of a powerful military force, which has de
facto taken over several governmental functions. (A: Then
it goes on with the different ships that are in the area.)

TABLE 1

US Military
Assets to be Sent to Haiti. (according to official announcements)

Several U.S. Coast
Guard vessels and helicopters (A: And on and on it goes.
It’s like an invasion.)

But
what makes you feel better too, it’s like after the big tsunami, remember a few
years ago, where they said that every country would match, every government
would match every charity dollar with a dollar of tax money for the relief
funds. Billions were collected. Billions of dollars were collected
and then after it was all in they announced that they’d put Bill Clinton and
George Bush Sr in charge of the fund and that’s the last you heard of it.
I said that at the time too, that will be the last you hear of it because those
poor guys over there where the tsunami hit will be gathering up bits of tin and
wood and knocking back some shacks together again without any aid at all
arriving, and that pretty well is what happened. Well, they put the same
two boys in charge of the fund for Haiti so we feel much better now, as two men
you can truly trust right?

This
is the farce that we’re living through. It’s geopolitics. Remember
what these guys say at the top too, even though they can certainly cause
earthquakes; that was even questioned at one point with a ship, a submarine in
the area of the last tsunami, because they have submarines which can actually
lay bombs, drill them into the fault lines and explode them, going back as far
as the 1960s. Regardless of that, the CFR and the Trilateral Commission
and all of its members always say they can take some catastrophe and turn it to
their advantage, for the geopolitical agenda. That will be done with
Haiti regardless of what caused it, natural or otherwise.

It’s
quite funny to watch the farce between Google… Now Google is one of the top
players in collecting all data across the planet for those who rule us.
They keep it forever, all data, all kinds of data. I’ve read articles
from some of their bosses in fact admitting to all of this. They’re going
through this spat with China over censorship because up until now…

Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, talking
about Google and its spat with China over censorship. It’s kind of like
the pot calling the kettle black. Here’s Google gathering data for
security services across the planet on EVERY single person on the planet and
they’ve been cooperating with China up until recently, supposedly, and
censoring their own dissidents. A dissident in China is someone who
questions anything in the regime, something that’s going to happen here too; actually it already is happening here.
This is from V3.co.uk.

Google to end censorship of Chinese searches

Company
threatens to pull out of China after human rights hacking

Iain Thomson in San Francisco, V3.co.uk 13 Jan 2010

Google has issued a
shock announcement that it is to end censoring the results of its Google.cn
search engine, after a series of hacking attacks that it says was aimed at
human rights activists. (A: Now did anybody ask us about did we
mind getting our material kept and snaggled by Google for all the top
guys? No. They didn’t ask us, for the top boys to listen to
it. But here they are making a pretense of standing up for the human
rights activists in China. [Alan laughing.])

The company said in
a posting on its corporate blog that Google and at least 20 other companies had
been the target of a hacking attack in December.

Google claims to
have seen evidence that the attacks were aimed at accessing the Gmail accounts
of Chinese human rights activists.

"These attacks
and the surveillance they have uncovered, combined with the attempts over the
past year to further limit free speech on the web, have led us to conclude that
we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China,"
wrote David Drummond, chief legal officer at Google.

"We have
decided that we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on
Google.cn, so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese
government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine
within the law, if at all.

"We recognise
that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our
offices in China." (A: Well we’ll see what happens
there. As I say, what a farce. Here they are making a big deal
about China when Google admits it’s been collecting data since it set itself
up. It’s collecting data on all of us with everything FOR the security
intelligence agencies. Such a farce isn’t it.)

The
BBC has the MET Office, that’s their weather office, a big, big organization
for the BBC. It’s totally on board of course with the new world order
because the BBC works FOR the British government. It’s paid for by the
tax money and it has political agendas, always has had. It was set up in
fact, to be the propaganda arm of the British parliamentary system… and nothing
has changed. This article is from the BBC to do with its weather
department that’s all for the global warming; it’s a rah-rah team for global
warming and all that stuff.

Met Office rethink on forecasts

By Roger Harrabin / Environment analyst, BBC
News

The UK Met Office is
debating what to do with its long-term and seasonal forecasting after criticism
for failing to predict extreme weather. (A: These are the guys
who are the experts, right, that are all on board with global warming.
They failed to predict the extreme weather that Britain and Europe is going
through right now.)

Some experts say the
Met Office should stop longer-term (A: …statistical projections…) forecasting
because it damages the organisation's reputation. (A:
Why? Because they are always wrong. They are ALWAYS wrong.)

Others maintain that
communication of the forecasts must be improved.

The Met Office has
been criticised for failing to predict in its seasonal forecasts the UK would
suffer this cold winter or the last three wet summers. (A: They
didn’t predict any of them.)

After being rapped
for its now notorious "barbecue summer" (A: That never
happened right, they got pouring rain.) press release, the winter forecast was
expressed in probabilistic terms, (A: And what they told the public
was…) with a 66% likelihood that the winter would be warmer than average (A:
Here they are with the worst freezing snow in 20 years.) and a one in seven
chance that it would be colder.

The Met Office has
now admitted to BBC News that its annual global mean forecast predicted
temperatures higher than actual temperatures for nine years out of the last
10. (A: 9 out of 10 wrong… [Alan laughing])

This "warming
bias" is very small (A: This is their excuse.)- just 0.05C.
And the Met Office points out that the variance between the forecast and the
actual temperature is within its own stated margins of error. (A:
So they can police themselves and pop it within its own margins of error.)

We
live through incredible farces don’t we? That’s what I was saying about
what do you pick to read on a show like this when there is so much farce out
there, except more farce. Here’s another farce here. See, we’re
getting steamrolled over, or railroaded I should really say. It’s
railroaded and stampeded into crisis after crisis after crisis, all planned
that way mind you, because we adapt quickly in crisis to any crazy
change. Any new way of living, we adapt so fast… and they know this
too from all their social engineering experts at the top. People have
already forgotten that we’ve had a monetary crash supposedly and that they
bailed out the banks with billions and billions, maybe trillions of dollars…
across the world. They said it would make banking more honest and all the
rest of that nonsense, at the time when they were dishing out the tax money to
the banks. Well, this is the Sunday Times.

Wall Street giants pay staff $100bn (A:
This is for bonuses.)

From The Sunday Times January 17, 2010 / Iain Dey

Four of Wall
Street’s biggest banks will this week reveal plans to pay their staff a total
of close to $100 billion (£62 billion), reigniting the row over bankers’
bonuses. (A: Well no kidding. Here’s the big boys too, the
guys that started it all…)

Wall Street’s big
payouts come as the remuneration committee at Royal Bank of Scotland prepares
to meet this week to determine the size of its bonus pot.

RBS — 84%-owned by
British (A: The British government, by the way.) taxpayers — has
indicated it wants to pay its investment bankers about £1.5 billion in
bonuses, even though it will make a loss this year at group level. The figure
could creep higher if it attempts to shelter its bankers from the impact of
Alistair Darling’s 50% tax on bonuses.

Lord Myners, the
City minister, has called a meeting of global finance ministers and regulators
in Downing Street this month to discuss other levies that could be introduced
to prevent future crises. (A: Here they are dishing out $100 billion
bucks or something to each other and meanwhile the government is meeting to get
a bigger pot to STAVE off really, or cushion the NEXT future crisis.
Isn’t there something stinking here? Something awfully rotten?
Hmm? You know something, there are no laws to stop these guys from doing
what they do. It’s the same when Rothschild’s conned the British people
into the Bank of England take over by telling them that Napoleon had won.
Nothing has been put in place to stop these sharks from ever doing this
again. Nothing. Nope. No one goes to jail for it. You
see, it’s legal robbery. They run the legal system too. This
is called LEGAL ROBBERY. It’s their due… and we can’t say hoot about
it.) George Osborne, the shadow chancellor, said this weekend he
would support calls for a new global charge on banks.

America’s bonus
payouts come days after President Barack Obama revealed plans for a windfall
tax on banks in an effort to curb the “obscene” bonus culture.

Anger over the huge
payments will be heightened by the fact that many of the banks are not
profitable. (A: Here they are, they’re not profitable but
they’re dishing out millions of bucks in bonuses to the top sharks.)

Of the four due to
report figures this week only Goldman is expected to post a profit at the net
income level, according to a consensus of analyst forecasts. The losses
blow a hole in the argument that the bonuses represent pay for
performance. (A: Well that’s for sure. [Alan laughing.])

However, all the
banks are expected to show large gains in their investment banking divisions,
which have been boosted by financial stimulus operations orchestrated by
governments around the world. (A: And the tax payers paid for it
all. Isn’t that just hunky-dory. It makes you feel better doesn’t
it?)

As
we’re being DEGRADED and we’re being dehumanized since 2001 with all the
security checks and bend-overs and all the rest of it at airports, and now you
get x-rayed and they can look through your clothing and have a good
laugh at you. It is admitted now too that they can save that – it is saved – and they can
transmit it wirelessly elsewhere. Here’s the next step of it and it’s
being tested out in Holland. I’ve got two articles actually on it.
This one is from Liberty Forest. The other one I have is from a Dutch
newspaper – but it’s in Dutch – but it confirms it.

(Holland) Dutch police develop mobile body scans

Rotterdam police are
trying to develop a portable scanner which will allow them to see through
people's clothing and look for concealed weapons, (A: This is the
excuse, for concealed weapons.) the NRC reports on Friday.

The force has been
given a €500,000 government grant to develop the mobile weapons detector,
which would use similar technology to the scanners being introduced at
Amsterdam's Schiphol airport, the paper says.

The aim is to
develop a prototype ready for production within three years.

The paper bases its
claim on a confidential document which suggests the scanner could first be used
as an alternative to random body searches in high risk areas. The mobile
detector would enable the search to be carried out more quickly and would only
be used on people suspected of carrying concealed weapons, (A:
Well you know that’s a lie. It’s going to be used on streets of people as
you pass by. That’s obvious.) police spokesman Paul De Kruijf told
the paper.

The document also
mentions the possibility of carrying out long-distance scans and mass
scans on crowds at events such as football matches. (A: That’s
soccer matches over there.) In addition, the scan (A:
I call it scam…) could be combined with a sniffer detector which
would analyse an 'air sample' from a suspect for traces of drugs or
explosives, the paper says.

Giampiero Gerini, a
professor at Eindhoven University of Technology told the paper the technology
to develop such scans is now mature. 'The biggest challenge is making it
portable and ensuring it can carry out a scan in seconds,' the NRC
quotes him as saying.

What does it
take for people to stand up and resist this?

You
know what it takes folks? It would take them cutting off your electricity
so you can’t watch TV or play games on the internet… and starvation, pretty
well. That’s what it would take before you do anything.
Unfortunately, the big boys know that too… they know that too. They’ve done study after study on uprisings
and revolutions. They understand that you go to the wall before people
retaliate and say enough is enough.

This
article here is kind of related to what I mentioned earlier about the wonderful
vegetarian society that MUST be brought in, apparently, by all the big
players. All they’ll have access to, eventually for us, is the GMO
food. Now, I don’t care what they’ve said about the GMO, you don’t mix
hundreds of foreign genes together into a single organism… to produce a
better carrot. You don’t put animal and insect and maybe even human
genes in there as well… to get a better potato. There is something
else here. They have admitted themselves that some of the top BIOWEAPON
specialists worked on all these projects to do with food. BIOWEAPONS,
what do you think bioweapons happens to be? Remember, the oldest and BEST
drugs still around today COME FROM PLANTS. Plants can produce
drugs. What do they want to have in the very near future? They want
a very PASSIVE society… while they go through these massive changes.

Again,
read the Technotronic Era; read Bertrand Russell’s various books on HOW
they were going to drug and dumb down and keep happy the population, rather
then have mass rioting going on. It’s
through the food. They discussed the food. They also
discussed injections. I’ve given the quotes many times on this particular
show in fact, from the big players themselves. This article is Yahoo
News. It’s also the Huffington Post.

Monsanto's GMO Corn Linked To Organ Failure, Study
Reveals

Tue Jan 12 / Yahoo News

In a study released
by the International Journal of Biological Sciences, analyzing the effects of
genetically modified foods on mammalian health, researchers found that
agricultural giant Monsanto's GM corn is linked to organ damage in rats.

According to the
study, which was summarized by Adam Shake at Twilight Earth, "Three
varieties of Monsanto's GM corn - Mon 863, insecticide-producing Mon 810, and
Roundup herbicide-absorbing NK 603 - were approved for consumption by US, European
and several other national food safety authorities." (A:
We’ve gone through the different agencies before and the people who are on the
boards of them, they’ve all worked for Monsanto before. So Monsanto puts
them IN to these agencies so that they can pass them.)

Monsanto gathered
its own crude statistical data after conducting a 90-day study, even though
chronic problems can rarely be found after 90 days, and concluded that the corn
was safe for consumption. The stamp of approval may have been premature,
however.

In the conclusion of
the IJBS study, researchers wrote:

"Effects were
mostly concentrated in kidney and liver function, the two major diet
detoxification organs, but in detail differed with each GM type. In addition,
some effects on heart, adrenal, spleen and blood cells were also
frequently noted. As there normally exists sex differences in liver and kidney
metabolism, the highly statistically significant disturbances in the function
of these organs, seen between male and female rats, cannot be dismissed as
biologically insignificant as has been proposed by others. We therefore
conclude that our data strongly suggests that these GM maize varieties induce a
state of hepatorenal toxicity.... (A: That’s your liver and
kidneys.) These substances have never before been an integral part
of the human or animal diet and therefore their health consequences for those
who consume them, especially over long time periods are currently
unknown."(A: This doesn’t surprise me because after all, we
were not living on pesticide-soaked foods before. This stuff is SOAKED,
DOUSED in the heaviest of pesticides. Of course, you have to buy their
particular Monsanto pesticide to go with the seeds when you buy the
seeds. It kills everything else off except their particular plant.
Well, guess what? The plants soak the stuff up as well, in its cellular
structure and you are eating it. But that ties right in with the
depopulation agenda as well, of course. There are all kinds of cancers
that have broken out in the last 20-odd years and 30 years and getting higher
all the time. And it’s NOT a crisis, so it’s planned that way. Back with
more after this break.)

Hi
folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. You
know, so much is presented to the public in a farcical manner – and I mean
farcical. When you wake up you start to realize that most of the news is
literally farcical the way it’s presented to us and we are never really told
the big reasons why anything every really happens. We are given a truth
that might be or a reason but never the real reason… never the real reason,
never the real truth.

I’ve
quoted some of the top players of the day, one by like Mandell House who
advised, actually he RAN President Wilson’s administration behind the
scenes. He said, for everything
that happens in politics, there is always a good reason and then there is the
real reason. So the good reason, the semi-plausible reason is
always given to the public. Even if there is only 5 percent plausibility
in their story, we’ll take that rather than go the whole way and say my God, what’s the real story? We
don’t want the shock of the truth. Strange isn’t it, how we work as human
beings. We really don’t want the shock of the truth. We don’t want
to think that the world is a big cruel place out there, even when we’ve watched
the machinations of teams of US, British and Canadian and other sources going
out to torture people across the world on a war on terror, we’re told, and
snatching folk at airports in their own countries and pulling them off to some
other country where they can be tortured. This is the real world.

We
know that they are trying to centralize all military actions WITH police across
the Western hemisphere, actually all the way to Australia really. It’s
worldwide, this whole regime, this world society that’s coming in. This
article is from Global Research.

Obama Calls for the Integration of State and Federal
Military Forces

Executive
Order Seeks to "Synchronize and Integrate"

By Tom Burghardt / Global Research, January 17, 2010

In the wake of the
Flight 253 provocation, over-hyped terrorism panics, and last year's Big Pharma
and media-engineered hysteria over the H1N1 flu pandemic, President Barack
Obama signed Executive Order 13528 on January 11. (A: I read
that on the air last week but this is another take on it.)

Among other things,
the Executive Order (EO) established a Council of Governors, an "advisory
panel" chosen by the President that will rubber-stamp long-sought-after
Pentagon contingency plans to seize control of state National Guard forces in
the event of a "national emergency." (A: I talked last
week about the CENTRALIZATION OF GOVERNMENT, a main plank of the Communist
Manifesto. Think about that.)

According to the
White House press release, the ten member, bipartisan Council was created
"to strengthen further the partnership (A: Partnership… here we
go. Why didn’t they use ‘harmonization,’ that’s a better word, right?) between
the Federal Government and State Governments to protect our Nation against all
types of hazards."

"When
appointed" the announcement continues, "the Council will be reviewing
such matters as involving the National Guard of the various States; homeland
defense; civil support; synchronization and integration of State and Federal
military activities in the United States; and other matters of mutual interest
pertaining to National Guard, homeland defense, and civil support
activities."

Clearly designed to
weaken the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 which bars the use of the military for
civilian law enforcement, EO 13528 is the latest in a series of maneuvers by
previous administrations to wrest control of armed forces (A: under a
central command.) historically under the democratic control of elected
state officials, and a modicum of public accountability.

You
can see where it’s all going and you can see what’s coming by all the things
that are happening right now. It’s not a pretty sight but you’ve got
to stand up and fight it.

From
Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your
Gods GO with you.