NOTING the "Motion Objecting to the Form of the Amended Indictment" dated
5 February 2001 ("Motion"), in which the accused Brdjanin ("Accused")
seeks an order from the Chamber requiring the Prosecutor to provide specific information
to the Defendant by way of an amended indictment that conforms with the requirements of
the law of the Tribunal;

NOTING the "Prosecutions Response to Motion Objecting to the Form
of the Amended Indictment filed by the Accused Brdjanin on 5 February 2001"
dated 6 February 2001 ("Response");

NOTING the "Reply to Prosecutions Response to Motion Objecting to
the Form of the Amended Indictment filed by the Accused Brdjanin on 5 February
2001" dated 12 February 2001 ("Reply");

NOTING that, in this case, a reply in respect of a pre-trial motion may only be
filed with leave of the Pre-Trial Judge;

PURSUANT TO Rule 54 and Rule 127(a)(ii) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence;

HEREBY ORDER that:

The Reply is accepted ex post facto as validly filed; and

The Office of the Prosecutor may file any further response to the Reply by 20
February 2001 at the latest.

Done in both English and French, the English version being authoritative

________s/____________
Judge David Hunt
Pre-Trial Judge

Dated this fourteenth day of February 2001
At The Hague
The Netherlands