Who Tampered With the Bible Scriptures=
? Matt
28:19 plus more

The Bible was written thousands of years ago
by the prophets designated by Jehovah, the
God who created us and the entire universe.
Through the ages, many people copied the
scriptures carefully and accurately because they knew that the words written were from Jehovah
God Almighty Himself.

Is it possible that in recent years some people may have =
strong>actually altered the written words so as to change the meaning drastically? Are there scriptures in the Bible now that were added without Jehovah’s consent?

Who are these people who dared to alter the Bible and why did they dare to make unauthorized changes? <=
/p>

Despite the Bible’s warnings not to add to, nor
take away from the words of the Holy Scriptures, some =
translators and copyists have altered and changed the
wording of various scriptures in order to support false
beliefs such as the Trinity Dogma. <=
b>

Was that a good idea?

“18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the
prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things,
God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: 19 And if any man shall take away from the wor=
ds
of the book
of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of
life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written =
in this book.”
(Revelation 22:18-19) (King James Version)

While some verses were added that were not part of the
original text, God’s name, Jehovah, was
removed to obscure
the distinction between God and His son – such as:

“What I discovered in most of the versions of the Bible
produced by trinitarians which I studied =
8211;
is irrefutable proof of intentional mistranslation of words which refer to the
spirit of God. This
statement is not intended as an antagonistic denunciation of those
translators. It is simply a statement of fact, and it is a fact
that no scholar on earth can refute. In the versions of t=
he
holy scriptures
which they produce, I learned that Christian trinitari=
ansroutinely and purposelymistranslate Greek
pronouns, so as to promote the doctrine of the holy Trinity.”

”Every time a trinitarian finger is p=
ointed
to a verse or to a word
which might, by a great stretch of imagination, be
interpreted
as endorsing the doctrine of a “holy Trinity”, it only ser=
ves
to show
how devoted to his faith a trinitarian can
become.”–The Influence of Trinitarian Doctrine on
Translations of the Bible by John David Clark, Sr <=
/em>

“It’s interesting to see that many of the scriptural “=
evidences”
said to be in favor of the doctrine of the Trinity, a=
re
grounded
in mistranslation, errors in textual transmission, and
sometimes even outright forgery. These can often be exposed by e=
ven
a
cursory glance at an English/Greek interlinear Bible or a Greek
concordance.”

“After all, if the Bible already clearly taught that God existed
as
‘three co-equal and co-eternal persons,’ it should hardly
seem
necessary to tamper with the text. The truth is<=
span
class=3DGramE>, it’s unlikely the
idea of a triune God could have ever been derived from the pages
of scripture as originally given by God, for it seems to have been unknown to the writers of God’s Word, and to the
first century
church.” -The Trinity- A Doctrine Overdue for Extinction; Part 2”Imperfections in the King James Version”by Ted Whitten

1 John 5 7For there are three that bear =
record
in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are
one.
(1John 5:7) (KJV)

The NIV translation of the Bible says that it is so: 1 John 5 6 This is the one who came by wa=
ter
and blood—Jesus Christ.
He did not come by water only, but by water and blood. And
it is the Spirit who testifies, because the Spirit is the truth. 7 For there are three that testify: 8&nbs=
p;the
Spirit, the water and the blood; and the three are in agreement. &=
nbsp;

Footnotes

5:7,8 Late manuscripts of the Vulgate testify=
in
heaven: the Father,
the Word and the Holy Spirit, and these three are one. 8 And there
are three that testify on earth: the (not found in any Greek <=
/strong>manuscript before the sixteenth century).

1 John 5:7 “This verse ha=
s no
basis in the Greek text. Under Roman Catholic pressure, =
strong>Erasmus inserted them…They are not a part <=
/em>of the inspired Bible”
(Word Meanings in the NT , Ralph Earle. P.
452).

What about Matthew 28:19?

19 Go ye therefore, and teach=
all nations,
baptizing them in the
name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.&nbs=
p;(Matthew 28:19) (KJV)

“When did the corruption of the
baptismal formula arise?
According to Canney’sEncycloped=
ia of
Religion,the early church baptized in the name of Jesus until the se=
cond
century. EncyclopaediaBrittanica (11th ed.,
Vol 3, p365) agrees, stating
that baptism was changed from the name of Jesus to the
words Father, Son, and Holy Ghost in the 2nd=
century.
And in Volume
2 of the Encyclopaedia of Rel=
igion
and Ethics, p.389, it notes that
baptism was always performed in the name of Jesus&nbs=
p;until
the time
of Justin Martyr.”

”Learned men, so calledCorrectores=
were, following
the church meeting at Nicea 325 AD,
selected by the church authorities to
scrutinize the sacred texts and rewrite =
them in
order to correct
their meaning in accordance with the views which the church&nb=
sp;had just sanctioned.”
-Einfhrung iin die Textkrit=
ik
des griechischen
Testaments: Eberhard Nestle

Despite the fact that God’s
Son repeatedly confirmed many
times that his Father was distinct and superior to himself,
the newly formed doctrine of the Nicea
Council completely
ignored his teachings.

The trinity doctrine says they are equal, but
–

Christ said that his Father was greater than he
was…

28 You have already heard me say that I am going and tha=
t I
will
also come back to you. If you really love me, you should be glad
that I am going back to the Father, because he is greater than=
I
am. (John 14:28) (Contemporary English Version)

…he said that there were some things he didn’t
know…

36 ”However, no one kno=
ws the
day or the hour when these things
will happen, not even the angels in heaven or the Son
himself. Only the Father knows. (Matthew 24:36) (New Living Translation)

…and some authority that belonged to his Father was not
his…

20 Then the mother of Zebedee’s sons came to Jesus
with her sons
and, kneeling down, asked a favor of him. 21&=
nbsp;”What
is it you want?”
he asked. She said, “Grant that one of these two sons of mine may&nbs=
p;
sit at your right and the other at your left in your kingdom.” <=
br>
22 ”You don’t know what you are asking,”
Jesus said to them. “Can
you drink the cup I am going to drink?” “We can,” they
answered. 23 Jesus said to them, “You will indeed drink from my
cup, but to sit at my right or left is not for me to grant. These places belong
to those for whom they have been prepared by my Father.” =
strong>
(Matthew 20:20-23) (New International Version)

…yet Trinitarians ignore these and many other =
strong>scriptures where Christ denied equality with God.=

They had to do this to make the trinity doctr=
ine
work.

Over the years, various Scholars have researched the question – “why are there contradictory
statements in the Bible”? Why would Christ say he was not
God in many scriptures and then declare he is God in a few others?

The experts have come up with findings that religious
pressure to support the Trinity Dogma caused some
copyists and translators to falsely insert and alter&=
nbsp;
certain scriptures in order to support the pagan trinity
formula that ancient Rome
forced upon all of her subjects.

Was everybody fooled?

“Who but a thoroughly deluded man would be so bold as, to&nbs=
p;intentionally mistranslate for his own doctrinal
purposes, the words of the apostles of Jesus? Who but a thoroughly
deluded
man could have so little fear of the righteous judgment of God
that he would publish a translation of the Greek that he himself
knows is unfaithful to the original words, as al=
most
all the translators
in this study have done? Jesus said that the time would come when
his followers would be murdered by those who think that they are
doing a service to God (John 16:2).”

“And if throughout Christianity’s sordid history
its leaders have
felt constrained by their faith to execute people, for the simple
“crime”
of refusing to receive some of its teachings, why should it be surprising&n=
bsp;
to learn that Christianity’s scholars feel free to alter=
,
without comment,
some of the words of the Greek text in order to promote their trinitarian
doctrine?” –The Influence of Trinitarian Doctrine=
on Translations of the Bible by John David Clark, Sr <=
/em>

So today, many still believe the pagan trinity lie=
–
and equate
it with true Christianity, while those who reject it as spurious
are labeled as a cult. They have thus pronounced good as
being bad – and evil as being good!

20 Woe to those who call evil good and good
evil, who
put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter
for sweet and sweet for bitter. (Isaiah 5:20) (NIV)

What else was altered in the Bible?

God’s name was removed and a senseless trinity lord
was added.

Was that enough? What else do the experts know?

The realization that Christ’s
name was never “Jesus”
but rather “Jehoshua”<=
/strong>,
may be startling to learn.

The Messiah has been called “Jesus” ever s=
ince
the

Romans took over Christianity as a state religion.
That’s a long time. So much has been said and done
in the name of “Jesus” for the last dozen centuries
that to call God’s son by a different name will appear
to be sacrilege in the eyes of many.

But that doesn’t change the fact that
“Jesus” never was his name.

“Ieous” was Gr=
eek for
“Hail Zeus”, which was translated
later into English as “Jesus”. And this error has
continued
to the present.
–Personal Names in the Bible
by Dr. W.F. Wilkinson, M.A.
Joint Editor of Webster and Wilkinson’s
Greek Testament: pages 342-343.

“Since Zeus was the top god of their experience,=

attaching the name Ioesus (hail Zeus) to Yahshua (Yehoshua) =
–
gave Him top priority
in the worship hierarchy.”
-Winds of Praise Broadcasting
Believer or Follower?
The Sound of the ShofarBy Jon Thompson

“Jehoshua was the na=
me given
to Christ by his

heavenly Father, Jehovah
God. Many years
after his death – Rome
changed his name to
suit their pagan heritage and to please their
pagan converts.

The name Joshua (Jehoshua)=
derives
its greatest
importance and highest sanctity from the fact
that it was sacredly chosen as the name to be
borne by the Messiah.

This name was later corrupted and altered
into the name Jesus.”
–Personal Names in the Bible
by Dr. W.F. Wilkinson, M.A.
Joint Editor of Webster and Wilkinson’s
Greek Testament: pages 342-343.