The reaction to each lawsuit, court appearance and detail in the seemingly never ending Penn State saga seems to be cooling as the months pass. The number of pages from all the documents seems to be getting shorter too.

Maybe we've hit the saturation point? Maybe there are enough details out there between two reports for people to reach a conclusion somewhere in between, or maybe their conclusions regardless of what is or isn't out there are already made?

As reporters we're obviously in a different position because we have to follow every twist and turn in this series of events. Because we're so wrapped up in figuring out all of the details it also makes it difficult to know what fans or casual observers know or don't know about Penn State politics, the lawsuits, the Board of Trustees, the sanctions and everything else in between.

When Bob Costas estimated that less than one percent of sports fans read the Freeh report I assumed the number was off. Everyone seems to have an opinion about the Freeh report but judging by a sampling of responses on Twitter, many people insist they didn't read it.

Based off of more Twitter responses when the Paterno family lawsuit was filed, many people also said they wouldn't read the document and didn't seem to care about the details. The length of the lawsuit, which potentially could take 2-to-3 years, could be reason for people to not want to get too concerned or excited.

Have you had enough with all of the developments and hit the saturation point or are you still waiting for more answers and more details?