Wednesday, July 31, 2013

The burning question on some minds
is, does the government run psy-ops against its own people? False-flag
attacks and the like. The answer is yes, as both the evidence going back
decades and the government's irrefutable admissions proves. Just
because talking heads on TV tell you it's crazy to believe such things
doesn't make it any less true. Why do you think they're on the TV
telling you this in the first place? Their job is and always has been to
sell you the government and the construct of our society, among other
things.

So, with that in mind I give you, "Sandy Hook & the Boston Bombing: You're Being Hoodwinked."

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Sen. Ron Wyden On NSA Spying: It's As Bad As Snowden Says

If we do not seize this moment in history to reform our surveillance laws, we will all live to regret it.

Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com

July 25, 2013 |

Editor's note: This is a transcript from a speech given on Tuesday, July 23, at the Center for American Progress in Washington.

When
the Patriot Act was last reauthorized, I stood on the floor of the
United States Senate and said, “I want to deliver a warning this
afternoon. When the American people find out how their government has
interpreted the Patriot Act, they are going to be stunned and they are
going to be angry.”

From my position on the Senate Intelligence
Committee, I had seen government activities conducted under the umbrella
of the Patriot Act that I knew would astonish most Americans. At the
time, Senate rules about classified information barred me from giving
any specifics of what I’d seen except to describe it as "secret law"—a
secret interpretation of the Patriot Act, issued by a secret court, that
authorizes secret surveillance programs; programs that I and colleagues
think go far beyond the intent of the statute.

If that is not
enough to give you pause, then consider that not only were the existence
of and the legal justification for these programs kept completely
secret from the American people, senior officials from across the
government were making statements to the public about domestic
surveillance that were clearly misleading and at times simply false.
Senator Mark Udall and I tried again and again to get the executive
branch to be straight with the public, but under the classification
rules observed by the Senate we are not even allowed to tap the truth
out in Morse code ­ and we tried just about everything else we could
think of to warn the American people. But as I’ve said before, one way
or another, the truth always wins out.

Edward Snowden’s Revelations
Last
month, disclosures made by an NSA contractor lit the surveillance world
on fire. Several provisions of secret law were no longer secret and the
American people were finally able to see some of the things I’ve been
raising the alarm about for years. And when they did, boy were they
stunned, and boy, are they angry.

You hear it in the lunch rooms,
town hall meetings and senior citizen centers. The latest polling, the
well­-respected Quinnipiac poll, found that a plurality of people said
the government is overreaching and encroaching too much on Americans’
civil liberties. That’s a huge swing from what that same survey said
just a couple years ago, and that number is trending upward. As more
information about sweeping government surveillance of law­abiding
Americans is made public and the American people can discuss its
impacts, I believe more Americans will speak out. They’re going to say,
in America, you don’t have to settle for one priority or the other: laws
can be written to protect both privacy and security, and laws should
never be secret.

After 9/11, when 3,000 Americans were murdered by
terrorists, there was a consensus that our government needed to take
decisive action. At a time of understandable panic, Congress gave the
government new surveillance authorities, but attached an expiration date
to these authorities so that they could be deliberated more carefully
once the immediate emergency had passed. Yet in the decade since, that
law has been extended several times with no public discussion about how
the law has actually been interpreted. The result: the creation of an
always expanding, omnipresent surveillance state that ­­ hour by hour ­­
chips needlessly away at the liberties and freedoms our founders
established for us, without the benefit of actually making us any safer.

So,
today I’m going to deliver another warning: If we do not seize this
unique moment in our constitutional history to reform our surveillance
laws and practices, we will all live to regret it. I’ll have more to say
about the consequences of the omnipresent surveillance state, but as
you listen to this talk, ponder that most of us have a computer in our
pocket that potentially can be used to track and monitor us 24/7. The
combination of increasingly advanced technology with a breakdown in the
checks and balances that limit government action could lead us to a
surveillance state that cannot be reversed.

What’s Happened Since 9/11
At
this point, a little bit of history might be helpful. I joined the
Senate Intelligence Committee in January 2001, just before 9/11. Like
most senators I voted for the original Patriot Act, in part because I
was reassured that it had an expiration date that would force Congress
to come back and consider these authorities more carefully when the
immediate crisis had passed. As time went on, from my view on the
Intelligence Committee there were developments that seemed farther and
farther removed from the ideals of our founding fathers.

This
started not long after 9/11, with a Pentagon program called Total
Information Awareness, which was essentially an effort to develop an
ultra­ large-­scale domestic data­mining system. Troubled by this
effort, and its not-exactly-modest logo of an all­-seeing eye on the
universe, I worked with a number of senators to shut it down.
Unfortunately, this was hardly the last domestic surveillance overreach.
In fact, the NSA’s infamous warrantless wiretapping program was already
up and running at that point, though I, and most members of the
Intelligence Committee didn’t learn about it until a few years later.
This was part of a pattern of withholding information from Congress that
persisted throughout the Bush administration ­ I joined the
Intelligence Committee in 2001, but I learned about the warrantless
wiretapping program when you read about it in the New York Times in late 2005.
The
Bush administration spent most of 2006 attempting to defend the
warrantless wiretapping program. Once again, when the truth came out, it
produced a surge of public pressure and the Bush administration
announced that they would submit to oversight from Congress and the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, also known as the FISA court.
Unfortunately, because the FISA court’s rulings are secret, most
Americans had no idea that the court was prepared to issue incredibly
broad rulings, permitting the massive surveillance that finally made
headlines last month.

It’s now a matter of public record that the
bulk phone records program has been operating since at least 2007. It’s
not a coincidence that a handful of senators have been working since
then to find ways to alert the public about what has been going on.
Months and years went into trying to find ways to raise public awareness
about secret surveillance authorities within the confines of
classification rules. I and several of my colleagues have made it our
mission to end the use of secret law.

When Oregonians hear the
words "secret law," they have come up to me and asked, “Ron, how can the
law be secret? When you guys pass laws that’s a public deal. I’m going
to look them up online.” In response, I tell Oregonians that there are
effectively two Patriot Acts ­­the first is the one that they can read
on their laptop in Medford or Portland, analyze and understand. Then
there’s the real Patriot Act—the secret interpretation of the law that
the government is actually relying upon. The secret rulings of the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court have interpreted the Patriot
Act, as well as section 702 of the FISA statute, in some surprising
ways, and these rulings are kept entirely secret from the public. These
rulings can be astoundingly broad. The one that authorizes the bulk
collection of phone records is as broad as any I have ever seen.

This
reliance of government agencies on a secret body of law has real
consequences. Most Americans don’t expect to know the details about
ongoing sensitive military and intelligence activities, but as voters
they absolutely have a need and a right to know what their government
thinks it is permitted to do, so that they can ratify or reject
decisions that elected officials make on their behalf. To put it another
way, Americans recognize that intelligence agencies will sometimes need
to conduct secret operations, but they don’t think those agencies
should be relying on secret law.

Now, some argue that keeping the
meaning of surveillance laws secret is necessary, because it makes it
easier to gather intelligence on terrorist groups and other foreign
powers. If you follow this logic, when Congress passed the original
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act back in the 1970s, they could have
found a way to make the whole thing secret, so that Soviet agents
wouldn’t know what the FBI’s surveillance authorities were. But that’s
not the way you do it in America.

It is a fundamental principle of
American democracy that laws should not be public only when it is
convenient for government officials to make them public. They should be
public all the time, open to review by adversarial courts, and subject
to change by an accountable legislature guided by an informed public. If
Americans are not able to learn how their government is interpreting
and executing the law then we have effectively eliminated the most
important bulwark of our democracy. That’s why, even at the height of
the Cold War, when the argument for absolute secrecy was at its zenith,
Congress chose to make US surveillance laws public.

Without public
laws, and public court rulings interpreting those laws, it is
impossible to have informed public debate. And when the American people
are in the dark, they can’t make fully informed decisions about who
should represent them, or protest policies that they disagree with.
These are fundamentals. It’s Civics 101. And secret law violates those
basic principles. It has no place in America.

The Truth About the FISA Court
Now
let’s turn to the secret court­ the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Court, the one virtually no one had heard of two months ago and now the
public asks me about at the barber. When the FISA court was created as
part of the 1978 FISA law, its work was pretty routine. It was assigned
to review government applications for wiretaps and decide whether the
government was able to show probable cause. Sounds like the
garden-variety function of district court judges across America. In
fact, their role was so much like a district court that the judges who
make up the FISA court are all current federal district court judges.

After
9/11, Congress passed the Patriot Act and the FISA Amendments Act. This
gave the government broad new surveillance powers that didn’t much
resemble anything in either the criminal law enforcement world or the
original FISA law. The FISA court got the job of interpreting these new,
unparalleled authorities of the Patriot Act and FISA Amendments Act.
They chose to issue binding secret rulings that interpreted the law and
the Constitution in the startling way that has come to light in the last
six weeks. They were to issue the decision that the Patriot Act could
be used for dragnet, bulk surveillance of law­-abiding Americans.

Outside
the names of the FISA court judges, virtually everything else is secret
about the court. Their rulings are secret, which makes challenging them
in an appeals court almost impossible. Their proceedings are secret
too, but I can tell you that they are almost always one­sided. The
government lawyers walk in and lay out an argument for why the
government should be allowed to do something, and the court decides
based solely on the judge’s assessment of the government’s arguments.
That’s not unusual if a court is considering a routine warrant request,
but it’s very unusual if a court is doing major legal or constitutional
analysis. I know of absolutely no other court in this country that
strays so far from the adversarial process that has been part of our
system for centuries.

It may also surprise you to know that when
President Obama came to office, his administration agreed with me that
these rulings needed to be made public. In the summer of 2009 I received
a written commitment from the Justice Department and the Office of the
Director of National Intelligence that a process would be created to
start redacting and declassifying FISA court opinions, so that the
American people could have some idea of what the government believes the
law allows it to do. In the last four years exactly zero opinions have
been released.

Now that we know a bit about secret law and the
court that created it, let’s talk about how it has diminished the rights
of every American man, woman and child. Despite the efforts of the
intelligence community leadership to downplay the privacy impact of the
Patriot Act collection, the bulk collection of phone records
significantly impacts the privacy of million of law­-abiding Americans.
If you know who someone called, when they called, where they called
from, and how long they talked, you lay bare the personal lives of
law­abiding Americans to the scrutiny of government bureaucrats and
outside contractors. This is particularly true if you’re vacuuming up
cell phone location data, essentially turning every American’s cell
phone into a tracking device. We are told this is not happening today,
but intelligence officials have told the press that they currently have
the legal authority to collect Americans’ location information in bulk.

Especially
troubling is the fact that there is nothing in the Patriot Act that
limits this sweeping bulk collection to phone records. The government
can use the Patriot Act’s business records authority to collect, collate
and retain all sorts of sensitive information, including medical
records, financial records, or credit card purchases. They could use
this authority to develop a database of gun owners or readers of books
and magazines deemed subversive. This means that the government’s
authority to collect information on law­abiding American citizens is
essentially limitless. If it is a record held by a business, membership
organization, doctor, or school, or any other third party, it could be
subject to bulk collection under the Patriot Act.

Authorities this
broad give the national security bureaucracy the power to scrutinize
the personal lives of every law­-abiding American. Allowing that to
continue is a grave error that demonstrates a willful ignorance of human
nature. Moreover, it demonstrates a complete disregard for the
responsibilities entrusted to us by the founding fathers to maintain
robust checks and balances on the power of any arm of the government.
That obviously raises some very serious questions. What happens to our
government, our civil liberties and our basic democracy if the
surveillance state is allowed to grow unchecked?

As we have seen
in recent days, the intelligence leadership is determined to hold on to
this authority. Merging the ability to conduct surveillance that reveals
every aspect of a person’s life with the ability to conjure up the
legal authority to execute that surveillance, and finally, removing any
accountable judicial oversight, creates the opportunity for
unprecedented influence over our system of government.

Why Checks And Balances Are Needed
Without
additional protections in the law, every single one of us in this room
may be and can be tracked and monitored anywhere we are at any time. The
piece of technology we consider vital to the conduct of our everyday
personal and professional life happens to be a combination phone bug,
listening device, location tracker, and hidden camera. There isn’t an
American alive who would consent to being required to carry any one of
those items and so we must reject the idea that the government may use
its powers to arbitrarily bypass that consent.

Today, government
officials are openly telling the press that they have the authority to
effectively turn Americans’ smart phones and cell phones into
location­-enabled homing beacons. Compounding the problem is the fact
that the case law is unsettled on cell phone tracking and the leaders of
the intelligence community have consistently been unwilling to state
what the rights of law­abiding people are on this issue. Without
adequate protections built into the law there’s no way that Americans
can ever be sure that the government isn’t going to interpret its
authorities more and more broadly, year after year, until the idea of a
telescreen monitoring your every move turns from dystopia to reality.

Some
would say that could never happen because there is secret oversight and
secret courts that guard against it. But the fact of the matter is that
senior policymakers and federal judges have deferred again and again to
the intelligence agencies to decide what surveillance authorities they
need. For those who believe executive branch officials will voluntarily
interpret their surveillance authorities with restraint, I believe it is
more likely that I will achieve my life­long dream of playing in the
NBA.

But seriously, when James Madison was attempting to persuade
Americans that the Constitution contained sufficient protections against
any politician or bureaucrat seizing more power than that granted to
them by the people, he did not just ask his fellow Americans to trust
him. He carefully laid out the protections contained in the Constitution
and how the people could ensure they were not breached. We are failing
our constituents, we are failing our founders, and we are failing every
brave man and woman who fought to protect American democracy if we are
willing, today, to just trust any individual or any agency with power
greater than the checked and limited authority that serves as a firewall
against tyranny.

Now I want to spend a few minutes talking about
those who make up the intelligence community and day in and day out work
to protect us all. Let me be clear: I have found the men and women who
work at our nation’s intelligence agencies to be hard­working, dedicated
professionals. They are genuine patriots who make real sacrifices to
serve their country. They should be able to do their jobs secure in the
knowledge that there is public support for everything that they are
doing. Unfortunately, that can’t happen when senior officials from
across the government mislead the public about the government’s
surveillance authorities.

And let’s be clear: the public was not
just kept in the dark about the Patriot Act and other secret
authorities. The public was actively misled. I’ve pointed out several
instances in the past where senior officials have made misleading
statements to the public and to Congress about the types of surveillance
they are conducting on the American people, and I’ll recap some of the
most significant examples.

For years, senior Justice Department
officials have told Congress and the public that the Patriot Act’s
business record authority ­ which is the authority that is used to
collect the phone records of millions of ordinary Americans ­ is
“analogous to a grand jury subpoena.” This statement is exceptionally
misleading. It strains the word “analogous” well beyond the breaking
point. It’s certainly true that both authorities can be used to collect a
wide variety of records, but the Patriot Act has been secretly
interpreted to permit ongoing bulk collection, and this makes that
authority very, very different from regular grand jury subpoena
authority. Any lawyers in here? After the speech is over come up and
tell me if you’ve ever seen a grand jury subpoena that allowed the
government on an ongoing basis to collect the records of millions of
ordinary Americans.

The fact is that no one has seen a subpoena
like that is because there aren’t any. This incredibly misleading
analogy has been made by more than one official on more than one
occasion and often as part of testimony to Congress. The official who
served for years as the Justice Department’s top authority on criminal
surveillance law recently told the Wall Street Journal that if a
federal attorney “served a grand­jury subpoena for such a broad class
of records in a criminal investigation, he or she would be laughed out
of court.”

Years of Deceiving Congress
Defenders
of this deception have said that members of Congress have the ability
to get the full story of what the government is doing on a classified
basis, so they shouldn’t complain when officials make misleading public
statements, even in congressional hearings. That is an absurd argument.
Sure, members of Congress could get the full story in a
classified setting, but that does not excuse the practice of half truths
and misleading statements being made on the public record. When did it
become all right for government officials’ public statements and private
statements to differ so fundamentally? The answer is that it is not all
right, and it is indicative of a much larger culture of misinformation
that goes beyond the congressional hearing room and into the public
conversation writ large.

For example, last spring the director of
the National Security Agency spoke over at the American Enterprise
Institute, where he said publicly that “we don’t hold data on U.S.
citizens.” That statement sounds reassuring, but of course the American
people now know that it is false. In fact, it’s one of the most false
statements ever made about domestic surveillance. Later that same year,
at the annual hackers’ conference known as DefCon, the same NSA director
said that the government does not collect “dossiers” on millions of
Americans. Now I’ve served on the Intelligence Committee for a dozen
years and I didn’t know what “dossiers” meant in this context. I do know
that Americans not familiar with the classified details would probably
hear that statement and think that there was no bulk collection of the
personal information of hundreds of millions of Americans taking place.

After
the director of the NSA made this statement in public, Senator Udall
and I wrote to the director asking for a clarification. In our letter we
asked whether the NSA collects any type of data at all on millions or
hundreds of millions of Americans. Even though the director of the NSA
was the one who had raised this issue publicly, intelligence officials
declined to give us a straight answer.

A few months ago, I made
the judgement that I would not be responsibly carrying out my oversight
powers if I didn’t press intelligence officials to clarify what the NSA
director told the public about data collection. So I decided it was
necessary to put the question to the director of National Intelligence.
And I had my staff send the question over a day in advance so that he
would be prepared to answer. The director unfortunately said that the
answer was no, the NSA does not knowingly collect data on millions of
Americans, which is obviously not correct.

After the hearing, I
had my staff call the director’s office on a secure line and urge them
to correct the record. Disappointingly, his office decided to let this
inaccurate statement stand. My staff made it clear that this was wrong
and that it was unacceptable to leave the American public misled. I
continued to warn the public about the problem of secret surveillance
law over the following weeks, until the June disclosures.

Even
after those disclosures, there has been an effort by officials to
exaggerate the effectiveness of the bulk phone records collection
program by conflating it with the collection of Internet communications
under Section 702 of the FISA statute. This collection, which involves
the PRISM computer system, has produced some information of real value. I
will note that last summer I was able to get the executive branch to
declassify the fact that the FISA court has ruled on at least one
occasion that this collection violated the Fourth Amendment in a way
that affected an undisclosed number of Americans. And the court also
said that the government has violated the spirit of the law as well. So,
I think section 702 clearly needs stronger protections for the privacy
of law­-abiding Americans, and I think these protections could be added
without losing the value of this collection. But I won’t deny that this
value exists.

Meanwhile, I have not seen any indication that the
bulk phone records program yielded any unique intelligence that was not
also available to the government through less intrusive means. When
government officials refer to these programs collectively, and say that
“these programs” provided unique intelligence without pointing out that
one program is doing all the work and the other is basically just along
for the ride, in my judgment that is also a misleading statement.

And
there have also been a number of misleading and inaccurate statements
made about section 702 collection as well. Last month, Senator Udall and
I wrote to the NSA director to point out that the NSA’s official fact
sheet contained some misleading information and a significant inaccuracy
that made protections for Americans’ privacy sound much stronger than
they actually are. The next day that fact sheet was taken down from the
front page of the NSA website. Would the misleading fact sheet still be
up there if Senator Udall and I hadn’t pushed to take it down? Given
what it took to correct the misleading statements of the director of
National Intelligence and the National Security Agency that may well be
the case.

What Are You Going To Do About It?
So
having walked you through how secret law, interpreted by a secret
court, authorized secret surveillance, the obvious question is, what is
next? Ron, what are you going to do about it?
A few weeks ago more
than a quarter of the U.S. Senate wrote to the director of National
Intelligence demanding public answers to additional questions about the
use of the government’s surveillance authorities. It’s been two months
since the disclosures by Mr. Snowden, and the signers of this
letter—including key members of the senate leadership and committee
chairs with decades of experience—have made it clear they are not going
to accept more stonewalling or misleading statements. Patriot Act reform
legislation has also been introduced. The centerpiece of this effort
would require that the government show a demonstrated link to terrorism
or espionage before collecting Americans’ personal information.

Senators
have also proposed legislation that would ensure that the legal
analysis of secret court opinions interpreting surveillance law is
declassified in a responsible manner. And I am collaborating with
colleagues to develop other reforms that will bring openness,
accountability, and the benefits of an adversarial process to the
anachronistic operations of the most secretive court in America. And
most importantly, I and my colleagues are working to keep the public
debate alive. We have exposed misleading statements. We are holding
officials accountable. And we are showing that liberty and security are
not incompatible. The fact is, the side of transparency and openness is
starting to put some points on the board.

As many of you are now
aware, the NSA also had a bulk email records program that was similar to
the bulk phone records program. This program operated under section 214
of the Patriot Act, which is known as the “pen register” provision,
until fairly recently. My Intelligence Committee colleague Senator Udall
and I were very concerned about this program’s impact on Americans’
civil liberties and privacy rights, and we spent a significant portion
of 2011 pressing intelligence officials to provide evidence of its
effectiveness. It turned out that they were unable to do so, and that
statements that had been made about this program to both Congress and
the FISA court had significantly exaggerated the program’s
effectiveness. The program was shut down that same year. So that was a
big win for everyone who cares about Americans’ privacy and civil
liberties, even though Senator Udall and I weren’t able to tell anyone
about it until just a few weeks ago.

More recently, when the
annual Intelligence Authorization bill was going through the
Intelligence Committee late last year it included a few provisions that
were meant to stop intelligence leaks but that would have been
disastrous to the news media’s ability to report on foreign policy and
national security. Among other things, it would have restricted the
ability of former government officials to talk to the press, even about
unclassified foreign policy matters. And it would have prohibited
intelligence agencies from making anyone outside of a few high­level
officials available for background briefings, even on unclassified
matters. These provisions were intended to stop leaks, but it’s clear to
me that they would have significantly encroached upon the First
Amendment, and led to a less­informed public debate on foreign policy
and national security matters.

These anti­leaks provisions went
through the committee process in secret, and the bill was agreed to by a
vote of 14-­1 (I’ll let you all guess who that nay vote was). The bill
then made its way to the Senate floor and a public debate. Once the bill
became public, of course, it was promptly eviscerated by media and free
speech advocates, who saw it as a terrible idea. I put a hold on the
bill so that it could not be quickly passed without the discussion it
deserved and within weeks, all of the anti­leaks provisions were
removed.

A few months later, my colleagues and I were finally able
to get the official Justice Department opinions laying out what the
government believes the rules are for the targeted killings of
Americans. You probably know this as the drones issue. These documents
on killing Americans weren’t even being shared with members of Congress
on a classified basis, let alone with the American people. You may have
heard me say this before, but I believe every American has the right to
know when their government thinks it is allowed to kill them. My
colleagues and I fought publicly and privately to get these documents,
used whatever procedural opportunities were available, and eventually
got the documents we had demanded.

Since then we’ve been looking
them over and working out a strategy that would allow for the pertinent
portions of these documents to be made public. I don’t take a backseat
to anybody when it comes to protecting genuinely sensitive national
security information, and I think most Americans expect that government
agencies will sometimes conduct secret operations. But those agencies
should never rely on secret law or authorities granted by secret courts.

Jimmy & JoAnne Moriarty joins
TPH to continue sharing their account of the events that unfolded in
Libya in 2011 which they eyewitness while visiting for business along
with their knowledge about the war crimes that were committed by NATO
upon the innocent people of Libya.

Additional Articles: * Libyan official ties Morsi to Benghazi
attack - A letter by a top Libyan official blames the attack that killed
U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens on Mohamed Morsi, the now deposed
president of Egypt. http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/libyan-off...

When a Remarkably Successful Establishment (albeit a Rebel within)
Investment Guru warns that He and We should “Run for The Hills” it is
important to ask why?

Immediately leading up to, and for months after, the 2008-09
Financial Crisis, not only Independent Commentators but also MainStream
Media commentators were Warning we were on the verge of Financial
Collapse. And some quite reputable independent commentators still are
issuing those Warnings.

So it is important to consider what the Main Warning Signals of an Impending Collapse would be, and how to Profit and Protect.

Indeed, we are already seeing some of those Signals sound such a Warning.
Consider the GEAB’s view and timeline:

“Historians will certainly consider the 2008 crisis as a warning shot before that of 2013.”

Global European Anticipation Bulletin, leap2020.eu

“-- end 2013, financial impact: collapse of
financial markets especially in the US and Japan. Banks can no longer be
saved by the states and BAIL-Ins are put in place;

-- end 2013 / 2014 spreading to the real
economy: The financial impasse causes / reveals a major world recession
and the reduction of international trade;

-- 2014, social impact: The economic
deterioration causes unemployment to explode, in the United States the
dollar's decline lowers the standard of living, riots mushroom
everywhere;

-- 2014 political crisis: the governments of the
most affected countries are under fire for their handling of the
crisis, forced resignations and early elections are expected, if not
coups;

-- 2014-2015, international management of the
crisis: together Euroland and the BRICS impose a new international
monetary system and lay down the basis of new global governance;

-- 2018: It will take the United States, the
United Kingdom and Japan five years to purge themselves of the crisis
with, ultimately, a greatly reduced standard of living and a
considerable loss of global influence (resulting from their refusal to
participate in the re-casting of global governance on new bases)."

Ibid.

And Goldmeister Jim Sinclair’s comment regarding the foregoing:

“I find no other source with which I agree more than GEAB.

I agree totally with the steps. My timing on the
final step is more 2020 than 2018 with the USA, GB, and Japan taking
seven years to purge the criminals that have gotten us to this point via
OTC derivative frauds.”

“2013 Crisis To Trump 2008”
Jim Sinclair, JSMineset.com, 7/19/13

So consider what might cause this Course of Events to be realized. Two possible interrelated Triggers
immediately come to mind. 1.) Major over-indebted Sovereign Nations are
unable to pay their debts and thus repudiate them (at least partially)
as Greece and Iceland have (de facto) already done. This would start a
Cascade of Defaults and 2.) Major Central Banks’ ongoing QE generates
visible intensifying Inflation (which exacerbates the debt problem
because lenders and the markets consequently demand higher interest
rates – Japan’s debt is already over 200% of GDP, e.g., and thus they
cannot afford to pay much higher interest payments).

In this respect, one of the necessary conditions already appears on its way to being fulfilled. Threshold Hyperinflation is already with us – though Bogus Official figures seek to hide it.
In the U.S. for example, Real CPI bumped up from 8.99% to 9.38% from
May to June 2013 (Shadowstats.com). Other Major Nations’ figures are
notoriously unreliable also (e.g. China). (An Argentinean economist
personally confided to us that Real Inflation in Argentina is 50% per
year, even though the government will not acknowledge it.)

And QE is, if anything, increasing and it is highly likely it will continue to increase
as we pointed out in a recent article. And that means Inflation will
intensify, and that means increasing interest rates. As rates increase,
Debts cannot be serviced and we have Greece writ large. So sudden
interest rates spikes (such as we have seen recently in the U.S.
10-year) are one Signal of Impending Financial Collapse.

And there are others.

Another indication of impending Financial Collapse (indeed, probably
The Primary Signal) would be a sudden Flight from, and dumping of, the
World’s Reserve Currency, the U.S. Dollar.
The Fed’s Ongoing QE will generate such a Flight at
some point – the only question is When? But we do not see such a Flight
yet because many Major Fiat Currencies are simultaneously
being debased by their Central Banks in the so-called Currency Wars. At
some point these debasements will begin to be manifested in a spike up
in commodity prices.

Indeed, we may already see the beginnings of that in the apparent bottoming of Commodities Prices. The CRB has moved up
in the last two weeks. (See Deepcaster’s latest Forecasts.) The $US is
still the least dirty shirt in the Fiat Currency laundry because of the
(falsely) perceived relative strength of the US Economy.

As to U.S. Treasuries, their strength/weakness will, short-term, continue to be determined by “tapering” talk. If/when The Fed talks tapering, Treasuries will weaken,
because Fed buying has artificially supported the Bond Market. Yet, out
of the other side of their mouth they signal “more QE,” and that causes
Treasuries to strengthen (yields fall).

N.B. : However, continuing
Fed-generated QE will likely be useless at some point soon to support
U.S. Treasuries. Non-U.S. Central Banks and Big Investors are already
dumping U.S. Treasuries by the carload. Thus, at some point even The Fed
will be unable to save U.S. Treasuries, which will than tank (Rates
Spike).

In fact, they have no choice but to continue QE and that is what will actually happen until Hyperinflation collapses the $US… However, when continuing QE (i.e. Bond Buying) no
longer serves to support Treasuries, i.e. to suppress Interest Rates,
that will also be a signal that Financial collapse is impending, because
that will signal The Fed has lost control of the Bond Market, and
Interest Rates in the Broad Economy. That has not happened yet but will.
(See our Forecasts.) (Some, including Rob Kirby, whom we respect,
reportedly thinks The Fed can control the whole curve indefinitely
through OTC Swaps and Forward Rate Agreements. But this omits Real World
Developments, e.g. QE generated Price Inflation of Real Assets.) We
already saw counterparty defaults on Paper Assets in the 2006-09 Crash,
and we will see them again, as The Bond Market Crashes.

In sum, the position of the $US as the World’s Reserve Currency
steadily weakens. Now Switzerland has joined the race to be the Yuan
Trading Hub for Europe. And Canada pushes to be the Yuan Trading Hub for
North America.

And we forecast that the Swiss Central Bank will not be able to keep
its Franc pegged to the Euro many months more. If one were to choose a
Good relatively “Safe Haven” Currency, the Swiss Franc would be one.

And yet another signal of impending Financial Collapse would be the
collapse of one of the world’s too-big-to-fail Mega Banks, all of which
are interrelated as counterparties on trillions of dollars of Derivatives and other Instruments. The prime candidate for collapse – Deutsche Bank.

The Fed and Bank of England can protect the American and English
Mega Banks to a degree because they can print unlimited money. The
Deutsche Bank has no such national currency
printer/protection (Yet another Negative Consequence for Nations which
relinquish National Sovereignty to Regional or Global Entities!) and DB
is under increasing pressure from the LIBOR and other fraud allegations
and investigation.

And there are reports DB has sold 60 thousand tons of allocated Gold certificates to clients. But who actually has the Physical Gold and how much do they have?

Other signals of Impending Meltdown would be signals that the Powers-that-be are seriously Distrusting each other, e.g.,

--the Overnight lending rate (i.e., among Banks) spikes
--Major Nations increasingly Distrust each other and/or the Mega-Banks
We have seen this already with Germany’s demand that its Gold be
repatriated from U.S. based Fed Vaults, where it is allegedly stored.
--The Politicians who usually do the bidding of The Banking Cartel, begin not to do the bidding of the Banking Cartel due to pressure from their Rioting Constituents.

Another (Technical) Signal of impending Equities and Financial
Collapse would be that Equities Prices hit all-time highs at the same
time that prices technically hit the top of the multi-year Bearish
expanding wedge (Jaws of Death) now forming and simultaneously that while stocks hit that all-time high, the NYSE advance/decline line does not.

This Bearish Divergence would warn that the Great Equities Crash
(Wave 4 in our forecast) is about to begin, and that therefore a
Financial Meltdown may well occur also. Such a collapse would likely
also occur nearly simultaneously with an Equities Crash then also
because the entire Financial system is more highly leveraged now than it
was before the 2008 Crisis – more unpayable debt, bigger
too-big-to-fail Mega Banks, much more Fiat currency in the system, etc. and no Effective Structural Reforms in place.

The recent elevated Oil Price (over $100 for WTI and Brent) can be
explained by considering the following: that Equities and Bonds are artificially
elevated, Fiat Currencies are losing Purchasing Power due to ongoing QE
and Currency Wars, and many Commodities Prices are depressed (until
just now) due primarily to China’s slowdown, and Gold & Silver
Prices have been depressed by The Cartel (Note 1).

Therefore, only Crude Oil seems a reliable store of value to
many sophisticated Investors. Thus it is not surprising to us that WTI
Crude has already approached the $110 level notwithstanding the Economic
slowdown. Part of this strength is due also to QE-generated Real Price
Inflation.
Because Crude is essential, with relatively high Inelasticity of Demand, and because it gets used up,
it is not easily subject to price manipulation though, for sure, its
Price is manipulated to a degree. Thus a spiking Crude Price provides
yet another Signal that Hyperinflation is impending and thus that a
Crash may be near.

Of course Geopolitical Events (e.g. Wider War in the Mideast) could drive Crude Prices sky high at any time.

We reiterate that, notwithstanding “fracking,” the USA still has to import half
its oil consumption, with increasing Import Demand coming from China,
the Eurozone, and Japan as well. By the way, given even the most
optimistic “Fracking” Production Projections, do not expect the USA to
produce more than 60% to 65% of its own oil consumption, unless there is
a Major Depression.

Key Point : Both rising U.S. Treasury yields and rising Crude Prices and the Real Numbers already tell us: Inflation is intensifying.

Finally, regarding Gold and Silver Prices as Meltdown Indicators,
consider that The Cartel took down Gold and Silver Prices dramatically
in mid-April, and subsequently, mainly to protect the $US. But in the
last two weeks Gold has risen from the low $1200s to the low $1300s,
notwithstanding the fact that the Hedgies have gotten into the habit of
selling Rallies.

In our view, the massive and intensifying Physical Demand is the
likely catalyst for this development, and the associated strength in the
HUI now up in the mid-200s from 200ish.

While The Cartel may be able to take Gold back into the $1200s (and Silver back under $20) it will likely not
be able to do so for very many more weeks. The Demand for Physical is
simply too great for both Gold and Silver, if even half the stories we
hear about near exhaustion of LBMA and Comex vaults containing Physical
are true.

Indeed, if the Depletion of Comex Inventories continues, it will have to go to a Cash Settlement Mode (as opposed to Gold Delivery Mode) in the next few weeks. This would launch Physical Gold Prices Sky High.

The Good news is that we expect that that Great Launch will Propel Gold up to $3000/oz
with a proportionate rise in Silver beginning at Deepcaster’s forecast
launch date. Therefore, prices at current levels still afford a Great
Opportunity to buy Physical if one does not own ones full allocation of
Physical. And many of the quality Miners are incredibly cheap with the
HUI still trading not far above 250.

Skyrocketing Gold Prices are yet another sign of an impending
Meltdown. Buy your appropriate Allocation of Physical and Quality Miners
Now while they are cheap.

Best regards,
Deepcaster
July 25, 2013

Note 1 : We encourage those who doubt the scope and power of Overt and Covert
Interventions by a Fed-led Cartel of Key Central Bankers and Favored
Financial Institutions to read Deepcaster’s December, 2009, Special
Alert containing a summary overview of Intervention entitled “Forecasts
and December, 2009 Special Alert: Profiting From The Cartel’s Dark
Interventions - III” and Deepcaster’s July, 2010 Letter entitled "Profit
from a Weakening Cartel; Buy Reco; Forecasts: Gold, Silver, Equities,
Crude Oil, U.S. Dollar & U.S. T-Notes & T-Bonds" in the ‘Alerts
Cache’ and ‘Latest Letter’ Cache at www.deepcaster.com. Also consider
the substantial evidence collected by the Gold AntiTrust Action
Committee at www.gata.org, including testimony before the CFTC, for
information on precious metals price manipulation. Virtually all of the
evidence for Intervention has been gleaned from publicly available
records. Deepcaster’s profitable recommendations displayed at
www.deepcaster.com have been facilitated by attention to these
“Interventionals.” Attention to The Interventionals facilitated
Deepcaster’s recommending five short positions prior to the Fall, 2008 Market Crash all of which were subsequently liquidated profitably.

Saturday, July 27, 2013

What if a company that you thought you could trust, knowingly sold
you a medicine for your child that they knew had the potential to give
your child HIV? How would you react? What if a government agency that
claims the responsibility for protecting you from such treachery, not
only looked the other way, but was complicit in this exchange?
Everyone has heard of Bayer aspirin, it is a household name. Bayer AG
also manufactures numerous other products, from pesticides to medicine
for hemophiliacs called Factor 8.
In 1984 Bayer became aware that several batches of this Factor 8
contained HIV. They knew this because there was an outbreak of HIV among
hemophiliac children, and this outbreak was traced back to Bayer.
Unable to sell their Factor 8 in the US, Bayer, with the FDA’s permission, (yes that’s right, the FDA allowed Bayer to potentially kill thousands) sold this HIV infected medicine to Argentina, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, and Singapore after February 1984, according to the documents obtained by the NY Times.
The documents showed how Cutter Biological, a division of Bayer,
shipped more than 100,000 vials of unheated concentrate, worth more than
$4 million, after it began selling the safer product.
The result of this sale of HIV tainted medication ended up infecting
tens of thousands and killing thousands. Thousands of innocent children
and adults have died at the hand of this corporation and no punitive
action has been taken against them. The health department leaders in
Argentina, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, and Singapore were all
imprisoned, while the US FDA continues down its hellish path.

When asked about the sale of the tainted Factor 8, Bayer responded,
”Decisions made nearly two decades ago were based on the best
scientific information of the time and were consistent with the
regulations in place.” This can be interpreted as Bayer asking the FDA
for permission to murder children for profit and the FDA giving its
approval. According to the NY Times,
the Food and Drug Administration’s regulator of blood products, Dr.
Harry M. Meyer Jr., asked that the issue be ”quietly solved without
alerting the Congress, the medical community and the public.”
No one in the government nor Bayer have been charged with anything in
regards to this matter. Bayer continues to sell its Factor 8 medication
to this day.By Matt Agorist, REALfarmacy.com

“Our way must be: never knowingly support lies! Having understood where the lies begin—step back from that gangrenous edge!”—Alexander Solzhenitsyn[1]

In his 1920 essay “Zionism vs. Bolshevism: The Struggle for
the Soul of the Jewish People,” Winston Churchill made the statement
that Bolshevism both ideologically and politically “gripped the Russian
people by the hair of their heads”[2]
and slowly led them to the slaughter house, where more than ten million
innocent peasants eventually lost their precious lives in less than
five years.[3]

Zionism ideologically and politically seeks to complete the work that
Bolshevism had started. Bolshevism quickly spread like wildfire in
places like China and other major Asian countries such as Vietnam.
Even Victor Serge, the revolutionary anarchist who was convicted of
terrorism in 1912, declared at the time that “The influence of
Bolshevism over Asia is very great.”[4]

As a communist revolutionary, Serge thought that “International
Communism — dialectical materialism and the theory of action of the
proletariat — opens up today the highest possibilities of the European
civilisation compromised and threatened by the capitalist regime.”[5]The “highest possibilities of the European civilization” ended up
being the highest crime probably in human history: Bolshevism in both
its metaphysical and ideological form carried out the greatest mass
murder, with more than ninety million deaths to its credit.[6]By the time that Bolshevism was done wiping out people by the
millions, Western nations suddenly had an epiphany in the 1980s. By 1983
in Orlando, Florida, Ronald Reagan denounced the Soviet Union as “an
evil empire” thatrepeatedly preached “the
supremacy of the state, declare its omnipotence over individual man and
predict its eventual domination of all peoples on the Earth. They are
the focus of evil in the modern world…”[7]

Ronald Reagan

Ronald Reagan could never have been a good cop. What do police
officers do when they are investigating a crime? They find out all that
can be found about the crime itself and the people behind it. They also
get deeper into the suspect’s origin, their background, and sometimes
even their ethnicity and religion.
Reagan was right in saying that the Soviet Union was “the focus of
evil in the modern world,” that it sought to dominate all peoples of the
Earth, and that it was “an evil empire.”
Yet in his entire speech, Reagan never told his audience that the
Soviet Union at the time was ideologically governed by Bolshevism, which
is another Jewish revolutionary movement, and which ultimately sought
to destroy Western civilization. Reagan should have consulted Alexander
Solzhenitsyn, who emphatically declared:
“There are many Jewish authors who to this very day either deny the
support of Jews for Bolshevism, or even reject it angrily, or else—the
most common case—only speak defensively about it. The matter is
well-attested, however: these Jewish renegades were for several years
leaders at the center of the Bolshevik Party, at the head of the Red
Army (Trotsky), of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee
(Sverdlov), of the two capitals (Zinoviev and Kamenev), of the Comintern
(Zinoviev), of the Profintern (Dridzo-Lozovsky), and of the Komsomol
(Oskar Ryvkin, then Lazar Shatskin).

Alexander Solzhenitsyn

“In 1918 Trotsky, with the aid of Sklianski and Yakov
Sverdlov, created the Red Army. Jewish soldiers were numerous in its
ranks. Several units of the Red Army were composed entirely of Jews, as,
e.g., the brigade commanded by Joseph Forman. Among the officers of the
Red Army, the share of Jews grew in number and importance for many
years after the Civil War.”[8]
Solzhenitsyn, as a sober and seasoned scholar, made the point that
“I have never made general conclusions about a people. I will always
differentiate between layers of Jews. One layer rushed headfirst to the
revolution. Another, to the contrary, was trying to stand back. The
Jewish subject for a long time was considered prohibited. Zhabotinsky [a
Jewish writer] once said that the best service our Russian friends give
to us is never to speak aloud about us.”[9]
Yet in his book Conspiracy: How the Paranoid Style Flourishes and Where It Comes From,
neoconservative hawk Daniel Pipes insinuates without a shred of
evidence that those who believed that the Bolshevik Revolution was
largely Jewish got their sources mainly from the Protocols of the Elders of Zion![10]
It got even more hilarious when Pipes accused Henry Hamilton of anti-Semitism for saying that “Bolshevism was Judaism.”[11]
But Pipes does not tell his readers that The Jewish Encyclopedia,
Jewish revolutionaries and newspapers and magazines made similar
assertions.[12]
In a nutshell, Reagan, a politician, got a wake-up call, and the Soviet Union eventually collapsed.
But Bolshevism in its ideological form did not die out then. It has
been reincarnated in two identical and Jewish revolutionary movements:
Zionism and neoconservatism. Both are almost politically
indistinguishable and, like Bolshevism, both seek to implicitly destroy
Western civilization in all of its manifestations.
Bolshevism was evil but the mass hysteria did not fully grasp the
extent of its evilness until it was almost too late. Zionism’s evilness,
on the other hand, is being displayed right in front of us, but no
politician is brave enough to break its political power. For example,
Joel Greenberg of the New York Times wrote way back in 1993 that
“Amnesty International, in a human rights report in July, said
Palestinian detainees under interrogation are ‘systematically tortured
or ill-treated’ by Israel. The International Committee of the Red Cross,
whose representatives regularly visit Palestinian prisoners, has
accused Israel of using interrogation methods that violate the Fourth
Geneva Convention on treatment of civilians in occupied areas…
“Human rights monitors estimate that 500 Palestinian detainees are
subjected to such treatment each month and that at least 30,000 have
been interrogated since the beginning of the anti-Israel uprising in
December 1987”[13]
This massive brutality has been going on for decades and in many
different forms. Just last year, nine Israeli teenagers were convicted
of brutally attacking a Palestinian teenager by the name of Jamal
Julani. When one of the convicted teenagers was asked how he would
respond if Julani had died from the incident, he said,
“Great. Let him die. He’s an Arab son of a bitch. What did he think,
that he would curse my mother? When I attacked him I was going to stab
him in the ribs to let him realize my mom is no child’s play. He knows
exactly why he is in the hospital.”[14] The other teenagers responded with a similar voice:
“We went to look for Arabs, to hit them and beat the crap out
of them, and I went ahead of everyone and I met the Arab who was
swearing. I got upset and yelled, ‘Here’s an Arab,’ and some more guys
came with me and then R. [the 15-year-old girl perceived as the
instigator] got there and gave him a slap in the back. He tried to get
up but I hit him with my foot in his pelvic area, and then all the guys
beat him up. He had a face that required a beating.”[15]
He also declared, “You can’t go by Damascus Gate without getting
stabbed. So why do they come here? I beat him and I’d beat him again.”[16] A year later, Jamal was still undergoing medical care.[17]
How many Americans do you think know about what happened to Jamal?
Get a microphone and start asking the average American even at your
neighborhood. The answer will surprise you.

Mohamed Merah

In March 2012, a gunman by the name of Mohamed Merah went into a
Jewish day school in Toulouse, France, and killed three Jewish children
and one rabbi. My heart went out to the families of those killed.
Everyone should sympathize in tragic situations like these, and these
acts of evil should not be tolerated.
The story was covered by almost every major news outlet in the Western world and in Israel.[18]
Report after report followed the incident, almost nonstop, and some of
those newspapers ran four or five stories of the same incident. One
rabbi declared that the incident happened because of “jealousy” on the
part of Gentiles about “God’s chosen people.”[19]
Yet around the same time, hundreds of Beitar Jerusalem fans beat up
Arab workers at the capital’s Malha shopping center in what was called
“a mass lynching attempt,” but not one person was arrested.[20]
The fans were even chanting “Death to Arabs,”[21] but one of the Arab workers declared that the police arrived more than one hour late.[22]
The police justified their decision not to arrest anyone by saying that
there were no complaints, and therefore no arrests were necessary.[23]
None of the major news outlets reported the story, except the Jerusalem Post, the Independent, and Haaretz. The Jerusalem Post only ran the story after some 150 protesters flooded the scene.
When Mohamed Merah gunned down the three children and the rabbi, Caroline Glick of the Jerusalem Post declared
without any substantial evidence that Western elites were accomplices,
claiming that these acts of evil formed “the physical and moral
landscape of our time.”[24]Where
was Glick, then, when those Palestinians were beaten? Isn’t this the
“moral landscape” of Zionist ideology? (French officials said after
investigation that there was “no evidence” linking Merah to Al-Qaida.[25])
Another incident—that even shocked former CIA operative Philip
Giraldi—was the May 2012 riots in Tel Aviv, where African immigrants
were targeted. The New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Los Angeles Times all stayed silent.[26]
On May 28, five young Israelis smashed the door of an internet café
owned by Yorusalem Mestun, a 22 year-old. They “pulled a knife on her,
while her Jewish neighbours looked on. The police came, checked her visa
and left, without, she said, offering help or sympathy.”[27]
Also in May, some Israeli settlers set fire to a West Bank village and shot some unarmed Palestinians.[28] It was later discovered that during the incident, Israeli youth tied up and beat one Palestinian who was already wounded.[29]
On May 24, 2012, Amnesty International released a report, declaring that Israel “frequently
uses excessive, sometimes lethal, force against demonstrators in the
West Bank and civilians in Gaza…Israel has engaged in the demolition of
Palestinian homes and other facilities in the West Bank, as well is
inside Israel itself, where homes of Palestinian citizens are destroyed
in ‘unrecognized’ villages in the Negev desert.”[30]
None of those reports made it on the air on popular news networks in
America. The only reason some of the reports saw the light of day was
because they were making a stir throughout the Middle East. There were
dozens of incidents in the spring of 2012 where Israeli settlers
attacked Palestinians and the Israeli Defense Forces just stood there
and watched.[31]
What, then, are the Zionists telling us here? Simple: when
Palestinians are killed, attacked and brutally maimed, life goes on and
the West does not really need to know. And if the West does know,
nothing is to be done.
But when even one Israeli is killed, this must be reported throughout
the Western world. Meetings must be conducted, and the Zionist media
must beat the Western world over the head about the news.Do the Zionists Really Care About the American People?
Now here is one of the most disgusting things ever. The Zionist
machine spends billions of dollars spying on Americans for years. They
said over and over that their covert enterprise has actually saved
lives.
Yet recently, “Al Qaeda claimed responsibility on Tuesday for
simultaneous raids on two Iraqi prisons and said more than 500 inmates
had been set free in the operation”[32]
As a result of the incident, “20 members of the security forces were killed 40 wounded in the attacks.”[33] The incident also created a fear that a civil war could break out.[34]
The NSA, the Israeli-run organization that can locate your cell phone even when it is off,[35]
could not locate actual terrorism. Again, what does that tell us about
the NSA’s covert activity? As Mac Slavo rightly puts it, the NSA“spent hundreds of billions of dollars to monitor the
activities of every single American by turning their listening networks
on purported domestic terrorists operating in the United States.“They know your underwear size. They know where you drove
your car today. They know what you put up on Facebook, texted to your
wife and emailed to your friends. And they’ve done it all in the
supposed interest of ‘national security.’“If, however, you were an Al Qaeda terrorist coordinating a
large-scale prison break to free senior members of your mid-east terror
organization, you would have been able to operate with impunity.“While our government is supposedly preventing terrorism by
searching grandma at airports, , arresting kids for making jokes on the
internet, deploying thousands of drones over America’s skies, and
looking for lone wolves, they have failed at their absolute top
priority: stopping actual terrorists from doing what terrorists do”[36]
Last May, the Assyrian International News Agency reported that the Syrian rebels/terrorists/jihadists
“attacked a village in Syria’s Western province and slaughtered all
its Christian residents on Monday. The armed rebels affiliated to the
Free Syrian Army (FSA) raided the Christian-populated al-Duvair village
in Reef (outskirts of) Homs near the border with Lebanon today and
massacred all its civilian residents, including women and children.”[37]
The only agency that intervened and killed those terrorists at the time was the Assad government.[38]Where
was the NSA then? Where was Obama? Where was the Zionist regime? They
were nowhere to be found. They were too busy supporting the Syrian
terrorists and tracking down Edward Snowden.[39]
After all, Congress has already signed off on army the Syrian terrorists,[40] despite the fact that Assad has been willing to engage in peace talk.[41] The only country that has loudly voiced his concerns about the United States arming Syrian terrorists is Russia.[42]
Once again, Zionism supports terrorism and pretends that it is
fighting terrorism. Anyone who supports terrorist organizations or
terrorist cells ought to go to jail. But in the Jewish Century,
supporting the Syrian rebels/terrorists is not a crime because those
terrorists are friends of Israel.
Moreover, in the Jewish Century, if the Zionist gangsters perceive
that you are a neo-Nazi and have children, more than likely they will
try to take your children away from you. Listen to this report by the Daily Mail:
“The children of German neo-Nazis could soon be removed from their
families and taken into care – in a bid to beat a rise in the
glorification of Hitler and the Third Reich.
“German authorities are becoming increasingly concerned with the
number of summer camps and special schools brainwashing youngsters into
worshipping a movement that killed six million Jews in the Holocaust.
“A recent raid on one camp turned up jigsaw puzzles showing Germany’s
pre-World War 2 borders and colouring books where children were
encouraged to crayon in the moustache of Hitler.”[43]
In a nutshell, Zionism does not care about the West’s future. It only
cares about dominating the world and taking good care of Israel. If
2,114 precious American soldiers die in Afghanistan,[44] that is a small price to pay if you are protecting Zionism.
If military intervention in Syria could cost the U.S. one billion dollars every month,[45]
that again is a very small price to pay. If poverty has risen at an
astronomical rate in nations like Greece and Italy because of the
economic collapse,[46] we still need to move on with perpetual wars in the Middle East.
Chuck Hagel recently said that “Our people are strong and resilient
after 12 years of war, but they are under stress — and so are the
institutions that support them.”[47]
Yes, perpetual wars are getting boring, and both the American people
and our precious soldiers who are getting killed for Israel are
exhausted. It is time for serious politicians to reexamine our
unconditional support for Israel, America’s greatest enemy.
I have been saying for months that Iran is not an enemy of the United
States—our “allies” are. Just a few days ago, John Glaser of the Washington Times had this to say:
“Contrary to dominant thinking in Washington, Iran poses no immediate
threat to the U.S. In fact, our Middle Eastern allies, eager to have
America do their fighting for them, wildly inflate the supposed threat
from Iran.
“The U.S. has built up various alliances in the Middle East since
WWII in order to fulfill a larger strategy of controlling the flow of
oil and preventing the emergence of another power in the region that
would threaten U.S. dominance.
“In the course of building these alliances, Washington has signed
security agreements with these countries, promising to subsidize their
militaries and come to their defense. In essence, this makes their
problems our problems.
“Our closest allies in the region, Israel and the Arab Gulf states, hate
Iran for a variety of strategic, cultural, religious, and ideological
reasons. As a result, they have hyped the threat of Iran and frightened
Americans into thinking the Islamic Republic poses an existential threat
to America.
“In an interview on CBS’s Face the Nation this week, Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned us that Iran is ‘building ICBMs
(intercontinental ballistic missiles) to reach the American mainland in a
few years,’ adding that, ‘they’re getting closer and closer to the
bomb,” and “they have to be stopped.’
The problem here is that Netanyahu is exactly wrong. In reality, the
current consensus in the U.S. intelligence community is that Iran has no
active nuclear weapons program and has made no decision as to whether
to pursue the bomb.
‘Recent assessments by American spy agencies,’ the New York Times
reported last year, ‘are broadly consistent with a 2007 intelligence
finding that concluded that Iran had abandoned its nuclear weapons
program years earlier’ and this ‘remains the consensus view of America’s
16 intelligence agencies.’
“Nevertheless, Netanyahu and other Israeli officials continue to go on
national television and contradict U.S. intelligence findings in order
to scare Americans into seeing Iran as more of a threat than it is.”[48]
Hopefully the American people will unanimously come to the same conclusion before it is too late.

[39]
Russia got the Zionist regime infuriated when it continues to refuse to
extradite Snowden. David M. Herszenhorn, “Russia Cites Extradition as
Sore Point With U.S.,” NY Times, July 22, 2013. As I write, NSA
director Keith Alexander has lobbied “against a proposed amendment to a
military appropriations bill that would stop the financing for its
phone data collection program.” The pathetic rationalization again is
that “ending the massive collection of phone records from millions of
Americans would put the nation at risk from another terrorist attack.”
James Risen and Charlie Savage, “N.S.A. Director Lobbies House on Eve of
Critical Vote,” NY Times, July 23, 2013; http://news.yahoo.com/backers-surveillance-program-battle-challenge-075910474.html.

Sheeple

The Black Sheep tries to warn its friends with the truth it has seen, unfortunately herd mentality kicks in for the Sheeple, and they run in fear from the black sheep and keep to the safety of their flock.

Having tried to no avail to awaken his peers, the Black Sheep have no other choice but to unite with each other and escape the impending doom.

What color Sheep are you?

.

100627

Follow by Email

"Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" Galatians 4:16

Current Featured Video

Guy confronts George H. W. Bush: "Murderous, Zionist Piece Of Sh*t"

The Gulag Archipelago

In America, it's time to recall the words of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago:

"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say goodbye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling in terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand. The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst; the cursed machine would have ground to a halt."

GEORGE ORWELL QUOTE FOR ALL TIMES

"At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas of which it is assumed that all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to say this, that or the other, but it is not done to say it. Anyone who challenges the prevailing orthodoxy finds himself silenced with surprising effectiveness. A genuinely unfashionable opinion is almost never given a fair hearing, either in the popular press or in the high-brow periodicals."
George Orwell, 1945

urupiper2 G+

The Dilemna

This blog hopefully will describe my journey toward being a full-time trader of futures contracts, mainly of the E-Mini S&P 500 futures contract (ES), and since August 2008, mainly the Euro/USD Currency Futures.

I have also lately decided (in Nov. 2008) to start posting mainly videos and commentary regarding my faith and world view of the rapid changes we as a country, and the world as a whole, have started to experience since our latest Presidential Election in the U.S