Monday, March 10, 2014

US
wants to combat anti-homosexuality movement worldwide

By Julio
Severo

The Associated
Press reported on February 26 that the United States, “troubled” by an
anti-homosexuality movement in Uganda and across much of the world, is
launching a new effort to combat what Secretary of State John Kerry described
as a “threat to human rights.”

Comparing a
Ugandan anti-homosexuality law to oppressive government crackdowns on German
Jews in the 1930s, Kerry said that according to the AP report, he was going to
direct American ambassadors to look at “how we deal with this human rights
challenge on a global basis.” He said 80 nations worldwide have
anti-homosexuality laws on some levels, and he called the one in Uganda — which
does not apply capital punishment — “atrocious” and “flat out morally wrong.”

Now, in the
definition of the US government, anti-homosexuality movements (groups opposing
gay “marriage” and other homosexual perversions) are a “threat,” because US
officials see the homosexual behavior as a noble “human right.”

Do “human
rights” rape and kill? They did so in Uganda. According to Scott Lively, in the
past the African nation had a law that required all men and boys in Uganda to
submit to the homosexual seduction of its ruler, King Mwanga. By official count
22 young men were executed under this law.

When Ugandans
began to convert to Christianity in the 1800s, a group of Catholics led by
Charles Lwanga refused to allow themselves to be sodomized by the King.
Enraged, King Mwanga had them torturously bound, marched 37 miles and then
roasted alive in a fire pit. The date of their execution was June 3rd, 1886,
and is today a national holiday commemorating Uganda’s rejection of
homosexuality and commitment to Christian values.

So it should be no surprise, according to Lively, that modern Ugandans are very
unhappy that homosexual political activists from Europe and the United States
are working aggressively to re-homosexualize their nation.

To compare an
anti-homosexuality law in Uganda to oppressive government crackdowns on German
Jews in the 1930s is immoral, cynical, and opportunistic. According to the book
The Pink Swastika, German Jews
suffered crackdowns from a mostly homosexual Nazi government elite. The
comparison would be appropriate if Kerry had condemned political, economic and
diplomatic crackdowns on Uganda and other poor because of their laws protecting
their societies against homosexual threats.

It is very easy
to use Uganda in preposterous comparisons that serve the purpose of immoral
propaganda on behalf of the Western pro-homosexuality imperialism. Uganda has
no power to resist the haughty Western nations. And now Uganda is under a
Western blackmail: if it does not repel its anti-homosexuality law, its poor
population will not receive foreign assistance, which will instead be directed
to “human rights” groups.

It is very easy
also for the US and European officials to chastise Russia for its law
protecting children from homosexual propaganda. Russia is not Uganda, but it is
a regional power that represents no significant threat to the pro-homosexuality
superpower. Besides, Russia represents no financial advantage for the Western
powers. It has no massive investments in Western banks.

What you will
not see is the US and European officials condemning Saudi Arabia, whose
Textbooks for Islamic Studies, officially used by the Saudi Ministry of
Education, say:

“Homosexuality
is one of the most disgusting sins and greatest crimes.... It is a vile
perversion that goes against sound nature, and is one of the most corrupting
and hideous sins.... The punishment for homosexuality is death… [the
perpetrator] is to be burned with fire. It has also been said that he should be
stoned, or thrown from a high place.”

Have you heard
Kerry say “atrocious” and “flat out morally wrong” at some point? Can you see
America “troubled” by an anti-homosexuality movement in Saudi Arabia and
launching the first effort to combat it? Can you hear the US government
describing anti-homosexuality laws in Saudi Arabia as a “threat to human
rights”?

If America does
it, I can overhear American bankers and Wall Street growling and yelling with
pain.

Saudi Arabia
treats homosexuality much worse than Uganda does and receives no condemnation.
The difference is: Uganda receives assistance money from the Western powers;
Saudi Arabia has massive investments in big Western corporations and banks.

America just
does not touch Saudi Arabia. When Muslim terrorists mostly from Saudi Arabia
attacked the US in 9/11, in return the US invaded Iraq (the enemy of the Saudis
and an ally of Russia).

Some years ago,
a homosexual from Saudi Arabia had his asylum request denied by the US government.
Obviously, the US government has no interest in asylum seekers from Islamic
nations as Saudi Arabia, which brazenly kill homosexuals. But let a homosexual
Russian request asylum by alleging that he was denied his “human rights” when
the anti-propaganda law in Russia prohibited him from having access to
children.

If Uganda were
Saudi Arabia, it could in the Saudi way treat homosexuality whatever way it
wished, unopposed and without worry, and America would turn a blind eye.

If it were Saudi
Arabia, Russia could similarly kill homosexuals, under the same American blind
eye. Because Russia is not Saudi Arabia, even Google felt free to mock Russians
by putting homosexual symbols in its website to directly confront Russia during
Sochi Olympics. Its mockery was aimed at the Russian law banning gay propaganda
to children.

“Google has made
a clear and unequivocal statement that Russia’s anti-LGBT discrimination is
indefensible,” said Human Rights Campaign President Chad Griffin, whose
Washington-based gay group has been lobbying American corporations to condemn
the Russian law (whose punishment is fines, not death) signed by Russian
President Vladimir Putin in July.

Can you
visualize a similar campaign against the Saudis, who do not fine, but kill
homosexuals?

The US
government also mocked Russians. Obama did not go to Sochi and made sure that
the world understood his decision: he sent prominent gay athletes to Sochi. He
showed no interest in Russian children and their well-being and protection. His
only worry was to show support to the gay agenda. In fact, this is the top
priority of his foreign policy. Homosexuality first, children later…

The global
anti-homosexuality movement, defined by Kerry as a “threat” to “human rights,”
would never be a threat if, as Saudi Arabia does, it had massive investments in
the US, even if its pro-family campaigns were aimed at killing homosexuals,
just as Saudi Arabia does.

Will the effort
by the US government to combat the global anti-homosexuality movement bother
Saudi investors and killers?

The US combat is
an ongoing effort to grant voice and power to gay supremacists and silence
their opponents. In 2011, WND reported,

“The Obama
administration has announced it intends to make the United States the global
sex cop, with plans to try to intervene in the workings of other nations where
homosexuality is not promoted as well as plans to create special provisions for
homosexuals and those with other lifestyle choices to gain special admittance
to the U.S.”

And in 2013, according to the Family Research Council, “The Washington Blade, D.C.’s gay
newspaper, praised the Obama administration for creating an army of
international lobbyists for same-sex ‘marriage,’ anti-discrimination laws, and
homosexual ‘rights’ around the world.”

To advance gay
“marriage” and other noble “human rights,” the US government is determined to
combat the anti-homosexuality movement around the world, including in Uganda
and Russia. The Saudis and other Muslim investors? They have always had special
exemption from whatever ideological and homosexual imperialism America imposes
on everybody else.

Let Muslim
terrorists from Saudi Arabia attack America, and America will attack everybody,
except the Saudis. And as a proof of her loyalty, America will have a CIA
director converted to Islam in Saudi Arabia! (In 2013, WND reported that the current CIA director John Brennan had
an Islamic conversion in Saudi Arabia.)

Let Saudi Arabia
kill homosexuals, and America will condemn everybody else, including Russia,
which has no law for killing homosexuals.

1 comment
:

The gay-juggernaut has been unleashed onto the world because in post-Christian America natural science and evolutionary thinking in many permutations, both secular and theological, have supplanted God's Infallible Word thereby replacing the authority and will of God with the authority and deranged will of fallen men.

Natural science and evolutionary thinking are taken for granted throughout the college curriculum, just as it is in all aspects of modern thought and experience, especially within the progressive liberal community. Evolution not only undergirds biological and earth sciences, but also Freudian and Jungian psychology, anthropology, law, sociology, politics, economics, the media, arts, medicine, and all other academic disciplines as well as being taught in many seminaries.

Darwin's philosophically materialist conception rejects the Genesis account ex nihilo together with Original Sin and the fall and teaches instead an inverted exegesis positing that over the span of billions of years life evolves from chemicals and man from lower creatures.

This upside-down view leads to a philosophy of moral relativism because if men were once something else, a genderless blob of matter and then later on lizards and even later still some kind of ape-like creature, then not only are we going to become something else–maybe divine supermen, god-men, or super robots—-but nothing can be said about transgender, ‘gay,’ and lesbianism since all life forms ascended from a genderless blob of matter spontaneously generated from nothing by the Big Bang.

With regard to soul/spirit, if man evolved from non-living, genderless matter or energy and lower life-forms, then his rational nature, his soul, differs not qualitatively but only quantitatively from the beasts. Like beasts, man is not a person but a creature of the earth. Like them he has no spirit—free will, higher mental faculties, and conscience. He is a fleshy androgynous robot or hominid whose brain is organized by the genome and the genome shaped by natural selection.

Worse, as all naturalist conceptions, whether secular atheist or theological, ultimately lack a source for life, consciousness, soul, and personhood, all are merely different expressions of anti-human nihilism which makes man equal to or lower than the nonhuman, thereby allowing for all manner of crimes against humanity, especially the weakest and the hated, envied, despised and inconvenient. For example, in paganized America tens of millions of unborn humans have been liquidated, our youth sexually perverted and atheitized, and our Constitution trashed while during the 20th century in excess of 160,000,000 human weeds, useless eaters, and unevolved dinosaurs were brutally murdered in one way or another by two evolutionary naturalist regimes: Marxist Communists and National Socialists.

Evolutionary naturalism is poisoning and destroying America's traditional foundations, and when the foundations, including "He made them man and woman" have finally been destroyed, all that is built upon them will be destroyed as well.