Tuesday, August 5, 2014

Ukranian Fighter aircraft fired shot at MH17

German experts investigating the cause of the crash of Malaysian jet MH17 have discovered bullet holes having entered and exited the cockpit originating from the outside. They have also found a certain type of shrapnel damage which can only be caused by air to air missiles.

These facts together with eyewitness reports lay the blame for the shoot down at the feet of Ukrainian government forces. In this day and age it is becoming more and more difficult to get away with false flag events. As the facts continue to come out, early suspicions on this being a false flag are being confirmed.

ARTICLE:

This is what a German pilot-cum-air technology expert Peter Haisenko has just published on the subject of the MH17 disaster (my emphases):

‘The misfortune of the Malaysian MH 017 is known to all. The flightrecorder is in England and is being evaluated. What can come of this?May be more than you want to accept….if you look at the image ofCockpit-Fragments, this picture is certainly shocking.Entry And Exit holes from bullets in the area of the Cockpit. This is not speculation, but analysis of clear facts: the cockpitshows clear evidence of bullet holes. You can see the entry holes andsome exit points. The edges of the bullet holes are bent inwards,these are much smaller and round in shape. A 30mm calibre. The exitholes are less well formed and the edges are torn outwards.Furthermore it is visible that the exit holes have torn the doublealuminium skin and bent them outwards. That is to say, splinters frominside the cockpit blew through the outside of the cabin. The openrivets have also been bent outwards….There is only one conclusion one can make, and that is that this: the aircraft was not hit by a missile. The damage to the aircraft is exclusively in the cockpit area….

Armour-Piercing Ammunition. Russia has published radar data that aUkranian SU 25 was close to MH 017. this corresponds with Spanish airtraffic control that two Ukranian fighter aircraft were in directcontact with MH 017. Examine the weaponry of the SU 25: it is fittedout with a 30mm cannon Type GSch-302 /AO-17A, with 250 rounds ofsplintering exploding bullets on a belt – shrapnel rounds. The cockpitof MH 017 was hit from TWO sides, as there are entry and exit holes onthe same side….’

Very compelling stuff, is it not?

Now read this (also German) article by defence expert Bernd Biederman, who offers equally sound reasons why the shooting down could NOT have been from a surface to air missile:

‘ the shooting down of the Malaysian Boeing on July 17 in the Eastern Ukraine “could not have been hit by a surface to air defense missile” .

This is the assessment of retired Colonel Bernd Biedermann in anarticle for the daily newspaper published in Berlin “new Germany”(Thursday edition). Had splinters from a surface to air missile hitthe plane, it would have immediately caught fire, argues the NVAanti-aircraft missile specialist. His reasoning is because of the“enormous frictional heat that the splinters generate on penetratingthe fuselage. A single splinter contains the same kinetic energy as a40-ton freight car hitting the buffers at 60 kilometers per hour.” Inthe case of the Malaysian Boeing, scattered fires had broken out afterthe impact with the ground, because hot debris from the aircraft hadcome in contact with combustible materials.

Biedermann is familiar with Soviet and Russian air defense technology,he led units in the duty officer system in East Germany and taught atthe Military Academy in the field of anti-aircraft missile troops.’

Articles are beginning to appear across the Web to the effect that Angela Merkel is disturbed by (and growing tired of) the incessant US propaganda being emitted in favour of its energy agenda….and so we must perhaps in turn view these articles in the light of her alleged new agenda concerning the creation of an alternative bloc to that of America. (More on this here in the near future).

But spin or not, these analyses make sense. The US State Dept has now shifted its position from ‘Russian atrocity’ to ‘tragic accident’. The above opinions suggest that neither are true: they suggest strongly that the Ukrainian air force took out MH17.