Note: Javascript is disabled or is not supported by your browser. For this reason, some items on this page will be unavailable. For more information about this message, please visit this page: About CDC.gov.

Volume 18, Number 12—December 2012

Letter

Zoonotic Transmission of Pathogens by Ixodes ricinus Ticks, Romania

On This Page

Downloads

To the Editor: The Ixodes ricinus tick is a predominant vector of a large variety of pathogens of veterinary and medical consequence in Europe (1). The most prevalent I. ricinus–borne infection of persons in Europe is Lyme borreliosis, a multisystemic disorder caused by spirochetes of the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex (2). Persons bitten by ticks can also become infected with many other pathogens, such as bacteria (Anaplasma spp., Francisella spp., Coxiella burnetii, Bartonella spp., Rickettsiae spp., and Neoerhlichia mikurensis); parasites (Babesia spp., Theileria spp.); and arboviruses (tick-borne encephalitis virus, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, and Eyach virus) (1). Symptoms induced by such pathogens are often diverse and nonspecific, complicating accurate diagnosis of the disease.

In Romania, cases of Lyme disease and tick-borne encephalitis (caused by tick-borne encephalitis virus) have been identified (3). However, little is known about the public health impact of these diseases, and none of the other tick-borne pathogens present in Europe have been reported as causes of infection in Romania. Although I. ricinus is the most abundant and widespread tick in Romania (3), the public health impact of I. ricinus–borne disease is likely to be underestimated. Therefore, the first step in evaluating the distribution of these potential pathogens is to establish their presence in ticks from previously unexplored areas.

We conducted a study to identify the main tick-borne bacterial and parasitic human pathogens known to be present in Europe but not previously detected in Romania. We tested for the presence of DNA from spotted fever group Rickettsia spp., Anaplasma spp., Francisella tularensis, and Babesia spp. in 147 I. ricinus ticks collected from roe deer and goats at 2 sites in eastern Romania: Bacau (46°35′0″N, 26°55′0″E) and Galati (45°26′22″N, 28°2′4″E). Specimens were tested by PCR, using specific primers for each pathogen or group of pathogens, as described (4). Sequences obtained from Eurofins MWG Operon (Ebersberg, Germany) were identified by using BLAST (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) and compared with sequences available in GenBank.

This is a report on the identification of the human pathogens R. monacensis, R. helvetica, A. phagocytophilum, E. muris, and Babesia EU1 in Romania. R. monacensis (also known as the Cadiz agent or Rickettsia IRS3 and IRS4) was first identified in I. ricinus tick samples from Germany (5) and was recently recognized as the cause of Mediterranean spotted fever-like rickettsiosis in Spain (6). R. helvetica was isolated from I. ricinus ticks in Switzerland in 1979, and, since then, it has been isolated in many other European countries (7). R. helvetica was associated with human infections in the late 1990s (8).

The role of animals as reservoirs for these pathogens is unknown. A. phagocytophilum is the causative agent of granulocytic anaplasmosis in humans, cattle, horses, and dogs, and is widespread throughout Europe (8). E. muris has been detected in ticks from Finland and European Russia and from ticks and rodents from Slovakia. In 2009, E. muris was also detected in patients with febrile illness in the United States (9). Babesia sp. EU1 has been detected in roe deer and ticks in several countries, and in 2003 was associated with human disease in Italy and Austria (4,10). Tularemia is known to be present in Romania and is thought to be exclusively and directly transmitted by hares. However, detection of F. tularensis DNA in I. ricinus ticks suggests that this bacterium might also be tick-borne.

In conclusion, the detection of DNA of various human pathogens in ticks in Romania strongly suggests that these microorganisms circulate in the country. Because all of these pathogens affect humans, our study highlights the urgent requirement for further research to assess their impact on public health in Romania.

The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.