Saturday, May 31, 2014

Actually,
it is not about our Cold Fusion, bur from sci-populistic reasons it infamously tells
that “cold fusion died an inglorious death”

This
is completely false, however, sadly enough, after 301+ months of history, of
bright and smart worldwide efforts, the desired contrary of that: “it has
started a glorious and useful new life” is also not true.

We
still have to wait while fugit irreparabile tempus however hope is still there…but
for how many of us?

I
have repeatedly stated that classic cold fusion/LENR is not what we wanted it
to be and, as such, it remains weak and unmanageable. Few of you believe me,
however cannot contradict me with facts. The new forms of CF (if we take it in
its broadest sense) are under strong attack on many fronts.

The
state of the field is not a source of happiness and I am asking with sadness:

Q: Based on the
recent publications of Mr. Gamberale & various others, what is your
position?

A: Firstly
we need to see what happened during the two live streaming presentations.

From 1st June 2013, our chief engineer Mr. S Amaxas & Mr.
Gamberale were setting up the Laboratory in Milan. From the 25th June they were both
running tests checking the set-up, the performance and the software.

During those
days they made various adjustments and improvements which were mutually agreed
upon, based on my knowledge.

On Friday
the 19th July, I and my team
arrived in Milan. In the meeting after
my arrival NO questions or quires were raised by Mr. Gamberale on the
performance of the equipment. Furthermore on Sunday the 20th July our stock broker
arrived and as per my promise given to Mr. Gamberale previously, he opened the
Accounts to receive shares of the Defkalion Holding Company of Canada and he signed for
them.

On Monday
the 22nd
July
Mr. Gamberale performed and presented the live streaming test for Italy in Italian, he was
enthusiastic about the technology to all of the attendees.

Attending
were journalists and scientists from Italy to whom afterwards in
private he explained in detail the technology. On the same day, all night and
till early morning of the next day our technical staff was preparing the
equipment for the Live Streaming presentation for ICCF18.

On Tuesday
23rd July at 11.00am Mr. Gamberale declared himself sick and did not attend
the live presentation.

The Live
presentation was witnessed by many attendees, including Mr. Mats Lewan, who
later was controlling independently and in detail all of the equipment and
operations.

The live
presentation was carried out with several difficulties such as power failures,
no A/C and inadequate time to degassing from Argon to Hydrogen. During this
live test none of the attendees raised any questions, doubts, whatever.

On Wednesday
the 24th July and before our
departure from Milan we were requested to
participate in a meeting with the following participants, Alex Xanthoulis,
Stavros Amaxas, Franco Capielo, Lucas Gamberale. At the request of Mr.
Gambarale our CTO Mr. Hadjichristos was not invited to attend.

During this
meeting Mr Gamberale made a presentation of his “SO CALLED” secret test which
were conducted on the 18th of July, I was totally surprised and shocked because his
attitude the previous days (of the 19th, 20th, 21st, 22nd July) was positive and enthusiastic.

My question
to him was why he accepted the Defkalion Shares, why he made the Italian
presentation and why he brought the subject up when we could not repeat the
same test together because of our departure schedule. I have never received any
answer to the above also to why he excluded Mr. Xadjichristos from that
meeting.

Due to
shortage of time and since all the questions were on the calorimetry, I
suggested to send him test that were conducted without calorimetry. These tests
were delayed to be sent due to my health problems at that time. However they
were actually sent one month later. In fact this information was sent two times
and although this information was strictly confidential we never received
further questions or any answers.

So I was
shocked when I saw published a test of Mr. Gamberale that was never conducted
together with us to prove his position. Although a strict NDA was signed by Mr.
Gamberale with a very high penalty clause in the case of a breach.

I was
strongly advised by our personnel to use our Lawyers for the breaching of the
NDA, but so far I have not taken any action, as I strongly believe that there
are strong hidden interests.

Q: You mean that Luca
Gamberale has made his test prior to your arrival and official tests in Milan?

A: Yes, he
could not have done it during our presence or after because our engineers were
next to the reactor all day of our presence and when we departed, we have taken
the reactor with us. Anyhow, he told us that his test was on the 18th.

A: He was
two days in Athens, 15 days in Vancouver and 35 days in Milan conducting tests.

Q: Did he have any
remarks or objections during the tests?

A: None that
I know.

Q: Did he really
receive shares of the company?

A: Yes, and
he signed for the shares.

Q: Did he signed a
NDA?

A: Yes, with
a very high penalty for breach of contract. My question is: if we go legally
against him, who is going to pay the penalty? Probably, somebody has promised
to pay for him. What the public seems to forget is what big interests are
behind this technology.

Q: Do you believe
that Luca Gamberale is a good scientist?

A: Yes, I
believe that Luca Gamberale is a brilliant scientist and I am wondering how on
earth he did not understand earlier that calorimetry was wrong.

Q: Was calorimetry
wrong?

A: I am not
a scientist. Calorimetry was not set by us but from brilliant and well known
international scientists.

Q: Do you have any
scientists who observed the tests and examined the data?

A: As I have
repeated several times, we are a business entity and not a lab. Up to now, we
have 12 scientists from big international companies who have signed and
accepted our tests and data and 3 who were neutral and still examine the data
with a lot of questions and answers.

Q: What about your
interview with Mats Lewan?

A: Mats is a
very good journalist but he, as every journalist, takes bits and pieces from
every sentence and he publishes accordingly depending how he wants to present
his view.

Q: Are you going to
publish any scientific paper on this issue?

A: No, the
next publication will be on our R6. Anyhow what we are doing and how we do it
concerns only our shareholders.

Q: You have announced
that you will trade your shares in the stock market soon.

A: We
believe the right moment is when R6 pre-industrial product is ready and
licensed. Anyhow our new shareholders do not believe in stock market. I have to
convince them.

Remark: “My personal opinion is
that the statements from the Gamberale Report re. the malfunctioning of
the flowmeter have nothing to do with the actual modus operandi of the Hyperion
R5 in conformity with the Defkalion Protocol during standard tests and the
Demo"