Heres what i gather. Order members definitely say Glenn Miller is a rat. They say he testified against them. Ive read Millers response to those allegations and his counter accusations. Millers reponse is a farce and anyone who is familiar with the legal system will realize it immediately. However, theres one thing I wont discount about his response. Even though I believe he is a rat, I find it suspicious that after all these years of knowing Miller resurfaced on VNN, order members have not sent out any legal documents or transcripts proving he is a rat. In prison, words dont mean much: it is paperwork that proves someone is a rat, and a convict will hold onto that paperwork FOREVER. So where is it? That leads a man back to one of Millers counter accusations. And in the end, after thinking about it, we probably dont want to know what really happened. As for Miller though, hes a snitch, and i wouldnt trust him to walk my dog.

Is he worth the publicity? No. No more than Hal Turner was worth the publicity, and he was a rat too. What I am seeing is the enemy trying to destroy the movement by facilitating frauds in leadership or figurehead positions.

Be careful who you follow or endorse. A leader or figurehead has to be genuine and squeaky clean. Thats why David Duke is safe and promoted widely around here.

Frazier Glenn Miller, a pseudonym used by Stephen Samuel Miller (the name on his indictment for paramilitary training law violations).
Under pressure and investigation from the FBI, Miller acted as a federal informant against The Order and was a key government witness in the Fort Smith sedition trial, where he testified against men such as William Pierce of the National Alliance, Don Black of Stormfront and Richard Butler of the Aryan Nations and many others.
Admitted to being a client of the Federal Witness Protection Program after he testified against former White Nationalist friends. He is denounced as a "race traitor" by both Tom Metzger, Louis Beam, Billy Roper, and many other well-known White Nationalist leaders.
And If all that wasn't enough, Miller has admitted to fathering at least one mixed-race child with Polynesian woman Rabang Miller.
Wake the hell up people! This "man" is an agent provocateur!!!!!

Ill be honest, Glenn Miller comes off as a nobody in this "interview." He has no presence and doesn't really present any really hard hitting facts that force people to think. They made him look like a fool.

Agreed. Miller is inarticlate, crude and "twangy". He is exactly what the LEFT
seeks to portray as the "leaders" of the various RIGHTIST movements. That's why Stern had him on the show. His points were valid. But when the messenger comes across as a "fool", no one pays any heed to him. Stern
very cleverly sought to discredit the man and his views by USING MILLER
as his tool.

Obama is not my president. He is an illegal alien who believes in nonwhite supremacy. Go to http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/. The occupation ends in 689 days.The current United States' current National debt is 18,155,853,840,783.67

I dont see how Glenn came off badly, Is it because he has a bit of a smokers voice? He had great points, always reached for the quotes when they challenged him and in general hit this interview out if the park from where I sit. sure, it would be great if David Duke could do every media interview however other white men have to step up and be counted as well and thats what he did. He was much better than say, the leader of the keystone state skinheads.

The listener called up and said that he was stunned by how much glenn knew and that he would be looking into what he said. He also plugged VNN forum multiple times...

I think all this criticism is a bit unfair, and id like to see how you all would do compared to him on the stern show. he did well

Glenn Miller did not come across in a good way I have to admit. That kike kept interrupting him and showed his true face a few times by saying "If the US is no longer white so what ?". But Miller should have prepared himself a bit better. The question about no Jewish president yet can easily be answered with "Franklin Delano Roosevelt" and "Dwight Eisenhower". Both part Jews.
I guess that is why Stern will not have David Duke on the show. He is more well spoken and could shoot down Stern easily. But why use such garbage as the Howard Stern show anyway ? What intelligent people are listening to this trash ? I hope NONE.