If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

I was under the impression that an anti-theist was someone who actively pushed people away from deity beliefs and would make arguments about why gods aren't real while atheists were people who just decided not to believe in a supreme being.

Though, definitions are funny sometimes. "Pagan" originally meant "of the countryside/villager" and it morphed into "someone who believe in multiple gods" just because Christianity took off in cities first and many village people were just isolated enough to keep their old traditions.

My name is Pichubro, I have a stable life and thus can have internet when I want it instead of having to resort to using an iPhone keyboard when Comcast is a piece of shit. Also, I'm in love with Mario.

Your an absolutely wonderful man, any girl that is yours is lucky and I know that from personal experience. ~KMT

My name is Pichubro, I have a stable life and thus can have internet when I want it instead of having to resort to using an iPhone keyboard when Comcast is a piece of shit. Also, I'm in love with Mario.

pichubro, you said that!?

"I'll go," said Chagataev. "But what will I do there? Build socialism?"
"What else?" said the secretary.

BUT, I think it should vary with the situation i.e if you are providing an example of something, it should be "Case in point" (This point talks about this case/ example) and if you're just saying it to conclude an argument proving that you're right, it should be "Case and point".

Either way could be right.

Originally made by LM:

~ I have said nothing because there is nothing I can say that would describe how I feel as perfectly as you deserve it. -- Kyle Schmidt ~

~Silence is one of the hardest arguments to refute. -- Josh Billings ~