• First President to Refuse to Tell the Public What He Did For Eight (8) Hours After Being Informed That a U.S. Ambassador Was Facing Imminent Death During a Terror Attack (Source: Mediate)

• First President to Lie About the Reason For an Ambassador's Death, Blaming it on an Internet Video Rather Than What He Knew to be the Case: the Al Qaeda-linked Terror Group Ansar al-Sharia (Source: House Oversight Committee, et. al.)

• First President to Have an Innocent Filmmaker Thrown in Jail After Lying About the Cause for a Deadly Attack on U.S. Diplomats, Using the Filmmaker as a Scapegoat (Source: CNN)

• First President to Use the IRS to "Unfairly Target Political Enemies" as Well as pro-Catholic and pro-Jewish Groups (Source: Sen. Ted Cruz)

• First President to Unlawfully Seize Telephone Records of More than 100 Reporters to Intimidate and/or Bully Them (Source: Associated Press)

• First President to Witness a Single Cabinet Secretary Commit Multiple Hatch Act Violations Without Acting, Speaking Out, Disciplining or Firing That Person (Source: New York Times)

••• First President to Systematically Release Detained Illegal Aliens Charged With Homicide Into the U.S. Population (Source: USA Today)••• First President to Release 40,000 Illegal Aliens with Serious and/or Violent Criminal Records Inside the U.S. (Source: Judicial Watch)

••• First President to Create Secret Police Units Inside Government Agencies to Block Lawful Investigations by Inspectors General (Source: Associated Press)

• First President to publicly announce an enemies list (consisting of his opponents campaign contributors; and to use the instrumentalities of government to punish those on the list - Source: Heritage Foundation)

• First President to Attempt to Block Legally-Required 60-Day Layoff Notices by Government Contractors Due to His Own Cuts to Defense Spending -- Because The Notices Would Occur Before the Election. (Source: National Journal)

••• First President to have the EPA conduct hazardous experiments on the ill, infirm and elderly to push a radical environmental agenda, in a manner not dissimilar to the Third Reich's inhuman medical experiments (Source: The EPA Office of the Inspector General).••• First President to be Accused by His Own Party of Ordering the CIA to Spy on Congress (Source: Washington Post)

••• First President to allow deadly Ebola disease-ridden patients to enter the U.S., refusing to restrict travel from infected countries like other Western allies (Source: New York Daily News)

••• First president to order his EPA to unilaterally overturn a Federal Statute (changing the borders of Wyoming established by an act of Congress, Source: Casper Star-Tribune).••• First president to systematically delay enacting a wide variety of controversial rules until after a presidential election (Source: Washington Post)••• First president to have Politifact designate one of his statements "Lie of the Year" (Source: Politifact)

••• First President to Leave the American Middle Class No Longer the World’s Richest (Source: The New York Times)••• First President to Retaliate Against a Rating Agency for Downgrading the United States Debt (Source: Investor's Business Daily)••• First President to Expand the Regulatory State to an Unprecedented Degree ("New record: Feds issued 56 regs for every new law, 3,659 in 2013", Source: Washington Examiner)

Energy Policy

• First President to Endanger the Stability of the Electric Grid by Shutting Down Hundreds of Coal-Fired Plants Without Adequate Replacement Technologies (Source: National Electric Reliability Corporation - PDF)

••• First President to Directly Violate the Law Regarding Prisoner Swaps with the Taliban, Bypassing Congressional Review (Source: The New York Times)••• First President to Invite a Leader of the Terrorist Group the Muslim Brotherhood to a Meeting in the White House (Source: Washington Free Beacon)••• First President to Out a CIA Station Chief in an Active Military Zone (Source: CBS News)

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Brief Summary: US ground forces and Apache helicopters are involved in battles to defend the Ain al-Asad base and retake the town of Baghdadi just 8 kilometers to the east, according to a statement by the Anbar Operations Command on Saturday. While the details of the fighting remains unclear, it appears that American armored vehicles with Apache air support are posted at 3 axis around the Ain Al-Asad base perimeter in addition to supporting Iraqi army and police forces as they attempt to clear Baghdadi of IS militants. A report early Sunday indicates that Iraqi forces had recaptured large parts of Baghdadi after a large offensive early Sunday which included airstrikes by Iraqi and coalition aircraft. It appears the IS militants have been driven into several pockets in the northern and northeastern parts of Baghdadi. According to a statement by Anbar police on Saturday, IS militants had seized the town hall in central Baghdadi as well as the police station there and freed all the prisoners after their initial assault to take control of the town. IS militants had also reportedly posted a number of snipers in high rises in the town to target security forces there during any counteroffensive. Initial estimates indicate that more than 1000 IS militants are involved in the fighting in Baghdadi. On Saturday, sporadic clashes had continued around the Ain Al-Asad base, with IS militants firing mortar and Katyusha rockets at it since Friday night. In addition, it appears that 13 Iraqi soldiers were killed during the IS attack on the Ain Al-Asad base on Friday, according to a senior Albu Nimr tribal source. An initial report had indicated that no Iraqi soldiers had been killing in the fighting to defend the base. In addition, while in control of Baghdadi, IS militants executed 33 people, many of whom were local policemen and members of government-backed Sahwa paramilitary group.

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

In 1994, a friend asked if I would donate blood for the friend's mother who was going to have major back surgery. I go to the San Diego Blood bank to donate. There is a map of Mexico on the wall. A line is through Mexico east-west about halfway down.
I ask what is the relation to blood donation.
I am told if a person appears with an accent or looks that indicate they are from south of the border, they are asked where they are from, and to point that location on the map. If it is below that line, they will not be allowed to donate.

So, what is the lie?

WE are being told that it is YOUR fault if you don't vaccinate.
TRUTH--Obama opened the flood gates to Central Americans, who carry a variety of diseases.

We didn't have measels until HE allowed them in.

Second, yesterday we had two revelations.
One was that the Obama Government (It damn sure is not ours) has cranked out 1.8 million work permits for non-citizens.
Those persons got jobs-- that would have went to U S citizens.
Yesterday, the head of the IRS admitted to congress in testimony that Aliens will get tax refunds

Well, they might--through fraud.

In a FOX newscast , the reporter said that banks and the government had been issuing "Tax ID Numbers" to those not citizens.

Here is how it really works, and I found this out working multiple cases of Worker's Compensation Fraud in California as a Private Investigator:

A. They did not get Tax ID Numbers, as that would reveal that they are here illegally and could be apprehended

B. Starting a case, you would enter the Claimant's Social Security Number into a large community Database owned by the Insurance industry. This will tell you if the person with that number has recent or multiple claims.

What you would get is that three people have that SSN.
Juan Garcia of Pico-Rivera
Maria Maldanado of Upland
and
John Chang DDS of San Francisco.

This one is easy--John Chang is the only valid holder of that number.

IF any taxes were paid, the credit went to John Chang.

C. Here in Arizona and in California too, we have repeatedly encountered individuals who would ONLY work for cash.
Oh, yeah, they worked for less, but only for cask. That meant NO TAXES were collected

Thursday, January 29, 2015

Why Do Liberal Media Despise Soldiers?

Rabbi Aryeh Spero | Tuesday Jun 13, 2006 12:00 AM-- Every six months or so, the liberal media search for any story that casts our soldiers in a bad light. Abu Ghraib was portrayed as indicative of almost the entire U.S. Army when, in fact, it consisted of less than 1/1000 %. Besides which, in the scheme of possible war atrocities, it doesn’t even rank. It was more uncouth behavior than atrocity.

As soon as a scenario is found where our soldiers defended themselves from enemy fire, road bombs or check-point crashing cars, the media indict our boys, without first considering the circumstances which necessitated the shooting response. Guilty! Guilty until proven innocent.

It is quite obvious the media have a preconceived attitude toward our men and women in uniform and look for events to affirm their view. It is equally obvious that the media do not wait to issue its guilty judgement, even before the facts come in. For in the media’s mind, the guilty outcome is a foregone conclusion given the liberal media’s notion of who our soldiers really are. They want to believe the worst.

In the mind of most of today’s smug liberals, our soldiers are rednecks — and rednecks, when let loose and not under control of "civilized" liberals, do what comes natural to rednecks — they act rednecky. Liberals feel that way since, in their parochial view, who would enlist and volunteer unless one is poor, has no chance for upward mobility, and has a tendecy and lust for violence?

They believe this since most have no friends or family in the military. These elitists perceive the soldier and the military as below their class. Perhaps they heard of a grandfather who served back in the days when there was a draft, but not today.

Why do they so despise our military? Why do they never come to its defense? Why do they never understand the frightful plight of the soldier who, when fired upon by the enemy, has no recourse but to fire back if he wishes to stay alive? Why does the liberal not understand what he has seen countless times, namely, that the Jihadist enemy positions women and children in his front while shooting at our soldiers?

It is because the liberal moralizer deep down knows that he does not have the physical courage and might of the soldier. Compared to the soldier, he is a coward and weakling. His strength lies only in bringing law suits and sounding morally superior to the rest of us.

The liberal moralizer needs to tear down the U.S. soldier as a way of guaranteeing that the soldier is never elevated to a more honored level in American life than is he, the liberal moralizer. Tear down the soldier and you destroy the honor we feel toward that soldier. Find anything to show you are better than the soldier so that you and your smug liberal friends can celebrate your superiority. Liberal media guys cannot abide that America has heroes who are not them.

For the media, the heroes are Woodward and Bernstein or Washington Post and New York Times reporters who splash across the world U.S. national security secrets. They admire not those who defend but who tear down. Many entered the business for precisely that reason: to indict our institutions and ways.

By and large, certain very liberal cosmopolitan men are jealous of what the soldier can do, and have a desire, a need, to destroy the object of their envy.

By pressuring our government not to allow our soldiers engaged in urban battles to respond quickly, liberals — especially the media — are heightening the possibility that our young men will be killed. Their school yard "legalities" are handcuffing our soldiers and are, I’m convinced, precipitating American deaths and casualties. Our soldiers are now hesitating to defend themselves out of fear of being brought up on charges at the hands of the ACLU.

Our home-grown leftists must know how their 24/7 finger pointing and accusations are endangering the lives of our boys. Perhaps that is why they do it, not to mention a desire to humiliate our military and cause the defeat of the U.S. They have become accessories to and instruments for death.

If we in the West decide that our soldiers can never fire back at the enemy when women and children are present, then we have handed the enemy a sure-fire method for our defeat. We might as well roll up the streets of the West, now, since the enemy can move forward with immunity house-by-house, building-by-building, in every urban setting in which they choose to fight, including London and New York.

Thank God our safety is in the hands of these guys from the Midwest and South and not those snivelly effeminates from Brown, Brandeis, Columbia and NYU. If it were so, we’d by now all be prayer rugs.

=============================================

Fast Forward to 2015. The Movie "American Sniper" comes out. Joe Public comes out to watch it. Joe tells Harry Jim and John, and exponentially, they tell their friends. The movie is viewed by a record number of people as evidenced by box office receipts. By financial returns, it is a proven hit with Middle America.

But, since this does not fit the Democrat/Liberal/Progressive Agenda, (DLP) several rocks turn over and out come the critics. The critique it and find several things to fault it for. My opinion: Mainly because it depicts the everlasting, enduring image of what a MAN should be, that he has a wife, not several sleep-ins, has children and cares for them, did his duty and did find an excuse or escape not to, and did not break down and turn to drugs or alcohol to soften the blow of what he had seen.

Oh, this does not sit well with the DLP. So, the creeps that crawled out from under the rocks, who are all very wealthy because the enjoyed the opportunities that Chris Kyle fought for-- lambast the movie on several accounts.

Although the movie is the obvious target, and the attempt to tear down Chris Kyle's reputation and accomplishments, and opinion of mine here: The simultaneous target was us out here in Fly Over Land, who revere SEALs, Marines Rangers--those who volunteered and had to prove themselves to gain the title. The message is--"Don't be worshiping these guys, after all, we just as worthy of adoration and respect as they are"

Fifteen years ago, the situation was this: These same creeps owned the media.

To oppose them was a sure result of being demonized with something you did --or failed to do in your past (And, if they could not find anything--They just made it up)

A criticism like those we have seen was intended to silence critics and preserve the status of those who had not achieved, or were guilty of several behavior misdeeds.

BUT-This time-- It ain't working. The miracle of the internet allows us to see information within seconds of it being published, and secondly, to retort to that with which we disagree. Respected people, in this case, veterans who served can speak from their experience- that experience which none of the creeps have .

The result is that Chis Kyle is a nationally known hero, and Michael Moore comes out a sore loser.

Sunday, January 4, 2015

May 2015 see every stumbling block turned into a stepping stone on the path forward. Trig just reminded me. He, determined to help wash dishes with an oblivious mama not acknowledging his signs for "up!", found me and a lazy dog blocking his way. He made his stepping stone.

- Sarah Palin

PETA then had a fit

A photo of Sarah Palin's young son standing on a dog to reach the kitchen sink is drawing sharp reaction.

The image of 6-year-old Trig, presumably preparing to wash dishes, and the reclining and seemingly relaxed black Lab-type animal is posted on the former Alaska governor's Facebook page.

" May 2015 see every stumbling block turned into a stepping stone on the path forward. Trig just reminded me. He, determined to help wash dishes with an oblivious mama not acknowledging his signs for "up!", foue and a lazy dog blocking his way. He made his stepping stone," she wrote.

The online response to the one-time Republican vice presidential nominee's New Year's Day post was fast and at times furious.

There were nearly 70,000 responses liking the photo along with a wide variety of comment.

Some blamed Palin, her politics, or called it animal mistreatment. Others offered her support and said the dog would have moved if it had been hurt.

The president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals commented Saturday, the Oregonian reports.nd m

"PETA simply believes that people shouldn't step on dogs, and judging by the reaction that we've seen to Sarah Palin's Instagram photo, we're far from alone in that belief," Ingrid Newkirk said.

There is absolutely no way I want to eat animals that have died slowly and in agony in the name of religion.

Because I don’t respect ANY religion enough to have people or animals suffer for it.

Nor do I want to live in a society that donates millions to save dehydrated donkeys in Africa yet thinks it’s OK to slit the throats of terrified creatures here.

And I didn’t think I did. Until this week when it was revealed that Pizza Express, along with scores of restaurants and most of our ­supermarkets, is selling halal meat, too much of which comes from animals that have their throats cut while fully conscious and are then left to die.

And it’s happening on the basis of a lie – because nowhere in the Koran does it say animals have to be slaughtered in this way. No Muslim is bound by his or her religion to eat halal meat.

In fact, the Koran clearly says Muslims should be considerate to ALL God’s creations, which includes animals.

It also says that while the blood must be drained from the body it doesn’t have to happen while the animal is alive.

Insistence on that comes from fundamentalists and a source called Hadith – teachings written 300 years after the Prophet died which are often used to justify hardline views. And confusion about these teachings is being exploited to mislead both Muslims and non-Muslims.

It’s no secret now that in Britain you can justify any barbarism, any degradation in the name of culture or religion – female genital ­mutilation, the ­subjugation of women, and now this shameful treatment of animals.To be clear here, I’m not angry just because ­supermarkets haven’t been up front about the fact they’re selling halal meat. I’m furious, appalled and disgusted that animals are still being killed inhumanely in a country that’s supposed to care about them.

And I don’t care that about 85 per cent of halal meat IS stunned – 15 per cent isn’t and that’s 15 per cent too many. And yes, the Jewish faith forbids the stunning of any animal before slaughter. Which is also cruel.

But let’s take religion out of the equation for a minute. As an enlightened society we cannot and must not allow the needless suffering of animals. The Brits have a heritage of animal welfare. We’re overrun with animal charities, so why hasn’t the Government condemned this barbaric practice?

And when Pizza Express insist halal isn’t cruel because the animals are stunned first – how can they be sure of that?

Do they have inspectors on site? I doubt it. Nor do I believe the statistics about how few are stunned. Not when there’s money and profit involved.

I’m not soppy about animals. I eat and enjoy meat. But I eat it expecting the animal to have been killed humanely.

And if the laws of this country say you can go to jail for starving a horse or a dog, then why not for slitting a ­chicken’s throat and watching for 10 LONG SECONDS as it dies?

And if cruelty to animals is illegal, why are there nearly 90 halal ­slaughterhouses here where this torment can be inflicted on animals in the name of ­religion?

Why have we become a country that’s afraid to fight for its own customs and beliefs for fear of offending the beliefs (in this case erroneously) of others?

I’ve heard the word “Islamophobia” levelled at people upset by the halal revelations. But this is NOT about Islamophobia – it’s about animal cruelty, pure and simple.

And any attempt to make it about religious prejudice is cynical opportunism.

Just imagine what those slaughterhouses are like, the terror of those creatures as they wait for their turn.

Which is why vets say killing the halal way can be cruel. As does the RSPCA and the Humane Slaughter Association.

And why, when so many other countries have banned ritual slaughter, is it still happening here?

I don’t want to eat meat if the animal has suffered. And I suspect most people – including many British Muslims – don’t either.

It’s time the Government showed some guts and made sure we don’t have to.

EXCLUSIVE: Evidence of BLM’s Deadly Abuse of Animals Taken from Bundy Ranch

SPECIAL REPORT21st Century WireThe US federal government might have just evoked the fury of animal right groups over their shocking treatment of cattle at the Bundy Ranch, and may soon face legal charges of severe animal abuse in Clark County, Nevada.Federal agency’s treatment of residents at the Bundy Ranch this past week included tasering, beating, wrongful arrest, threatening residents with attack dogs, and mobilizing a federal paramilitary force whose barrels were trained on US citizens, all in all, spending at least $3 million of tax payer money in an effort to sell stolen cattle over state lines in Utah and California. A legal argument has also been made that the USDepartment of Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is now guilty of racketeering under the federal RIC) statute (Racketeer Influenced and Corruption Organizations). If all that wasn’t enough, evidence is now emerging regarding pattern of extreme cruelty and abuse, and suspected culling of animals from the Bundy Ranch.Nevada Assemblywoman Michele Fiore has released new shocking information and images which document the horrors which BLM agents have inflicted on previously happy and healthy livestock.During a live radio broadcast of The Pete Santilli Show onGNM, Fiore reveals new details of “the BLM’s method of herding where they have slaughtered horses and cows. This time we have video of it, and pictures of it.”“I did post the first picture of one cow who was shot in the back of the head from a helicopter (photo above).”“I personally helped save a calf who still had an umbilical cord attached to her as she was separated from her mom (see photo via Twitter below). It is such a disgusting event (…)… they (BLM) don’t herd cattle – they slaughter cattle”, said Fiore.According to the Bundy family, in total, 27 baby calves have been rescued thus far, but farmers are still having trouble matching them up with their mothers.‘Abusively corralled’“If you look at the stewardship of land, and herding of cattle, first of all these particular cattle that were grazing on 600,000 acres – understand that when the Bundy family would herd their own cattle, there would be water taps to where the cattle would go down to the water and herd them humbly and softly – no cruelty, no abuse, herding them to where the cattle could get injured”. “We now have an evidenced-based argument now with how the BLM cannot take care of that cattle. We have cows giving birth (in the federal pen) where baby calves have been stepped on and killed.”“This is the BLM’s practice. They herd animals with helicopters, ATV’s, and shotguns… If any cows get out of line – they get a bullet in the back of the head”.“Make sure the BLM are off state land and make sure the BLM are not allowed to herd cattle again”.Mass graves“Near their compound, right off the highway, they were digging holes (…)… They tried to bury some cows on the compound, but I guess they didn’t dig the hole deep enough, so throw a cow in and they dirt over him and you have cows legs cows’ legs sticking up out of the dirt”.Earlier this week GMN revealed a secret recording of the BLM Special Agent in Charge, Daniel P. Love (photo, left), who had stated that the BLM have not killed any cattle. Fiore’s reply to Love’s claim:“He’s a flat out liar, period.”It was confirmed by ranchers and observers last week of how the BLM and their “contract cowboy” had deployed aggressive practices whilst rustling the Bundy’s herd, using tactical helicopters (image, below)forcing cattle to removal zones, often times driving cows uphill in 90F heat – a lethal practice known to cause tremendous stress and exhaustion to the animals, causing sickness and even premature death.Last week, farmers suspected that BLM agents were also scooping up the dead animals with heavy equipment like Backhoe diggers, and either burying carcasses somewhere on the 600,000 acre public grazing land, or disposing of them somewhere off site.In addition, reports by observers confirmed that spring heifers who were subject to abusive BLM tactics were forced to abandon some calves behind to hide in the desert bush (a common practice by mothers who are being rustled, who later can backtrack to retrieve their young) putting the calves at risk of death.Critics now believe the BLM and Clark County Sheriff’s Office could be facing a strong legal challenge for their reckless handling of the ill-fated operation underlined by a litany of both human and animal rights abuses.PHOTO provided by Michele Fiore – visit her @VoteFiore on Twitter.