This rapid-fire session felt like TED on speed. Each presenter had 7 minutes to present, then the floor was opened for discussion. There were a couple clear themes that resonated with me.

First, Manveer Heir was the only presenter to focus on gaming from a non-MMOG. Heir pointed out that most modern games follow a black and white model of ethics–the kind of ethic you see in Star Wars, for instance. In this framework, the choices of the players are very limited and do not accurately reflect the world around us. He is advocating for a more “grey” ethic where the choices available to the player are vast and, at times irreversible. In this grey ethic, the player would experience a larger pallet of emotions. For instance, if you, as the player, are faced with a scenario where killing a closely aligned character would save a mass of people, and you knew you could not simply save and return if you didn’t like the results, you are going to spend some time determining the reletive value of that choice. You might experience grief or regret instead of simply blindly choosing to kill knowing you can go back if you want. Heir sees four key elements to a game that truely pulls off a grey ethic:

Narrative (the player must be emotionally invested; narrative must be in line of the mechanics of the game)

Consequences (must have significant ones for gamer’s choices)

Obstacles (can make the decisions more complecated)

Permanence (Saving and going back circumvent permanence–instead, create a series of key moments in the game that cannot be reversed and change the outcome of the game)

My first reaction was that these four keys translate into a developers nightmare. Heir would agree. He pointed out that producers would look at a branch of game play that might only be used, say, 10% of the time (when a player made a certain pivotal choice) and simply cut it. This model for game development does not seem cost effective to the bean counters, but it would move games closer to a life-like experience.

Educators are not bean counters. Educators see the intrinsic value of creating an ethic that has more than two choices. And I, for one, believe this type of development, though labor intensive, would provide opportunities to create scenarios for the classroom that are not about simply “winning” or “experiencing”. A game could be about why you make the choices you do. The value is in the conversation/reflection after playing. Students could be places in losing battles in the Civil War and allowed to make different choices than those actually made, or they might be a genetic scientist who has to determine where the line between progress and abuse of power is with their work. The game would move from a linear simulation to a playground for exploration.

The other presenters focused on online communities (World of Warcraft and GoPets). The common thread in these presentations was that there was no specific ethic (Black, White, or Grey). The designers of the game leave those choices up to the players. In place of an ethic, these games rely on the reputation of the player and the “guild” to guide the players. This opens the door for abuse and intollerance, but ultimately puts the responsibility on the player.

Educators often fear introducing a game that allows for killing and abuse. This is why we gravitate to Second Life in the classroom instead of World of Warcraft or EVE. But putting those constraints on the students means cutting away a vast set of scenarios that could be used as teachable moments. If our students are playing these games outside of school, and these games are shaping the student’s perception of the world. Shouldn’t we be open to these games in school if for no other reason than the convesations we could have about the choices we make in games and how they would translate in our real lives?

Related posts

iTunes has released a new game for iPods called iQuiz (available through the iTunes store). Aspyr is now offering a new free quiz maker for Macs (PC to come). Could be an interesting review tool. You could have students produce questions and answers and create a review quiz from the best submissions. via TUAW UPDATE: Aspyr has now made iQuiz Maker available for PCs. (Thanks, Mike)

MobZombies The twist is that a player’s physical position controls the position of their zombie-world avatar, forcing the player to actually move around the real world to succeed in the game.The virtual zombie-world is a simple environment — the game’s complexity comes from players having to negotiate real-world objects in order to avoid the zombies and stay alive. The scoring system is simple: the longer you can stay alive, the higher your score. Of course, the longer you stick around, the more zombies you’ll encounter. I couldn’t resist this one- What a great game for PE not to mention fighting the obesity epidemic! It’s ideas like this that need to be applied to education. Simple, interactive and fun. Now picture being able to solve math problems by running to different numbers or by making physical diagrams or even adding a physical/competition dimension to miserable multiple choice questions. -Only the first 8 people to sprint to the virtual head of John Smith move on to the next level. Am I crazy or does this sound like a lot of fun? via Boingboing

Tom has been gracious enough to let me back in the door to blog my experience at the Gaming + Learning + Society conference this week. Designing 8-bit Learning Games for a $10 Computer Presented by Derek Lomas Derek Lomas wants you to join his open-source educational software revolution. Lomas, along with two other partners, founded Playpower when they realized educators was lacking a rich, open-source developer community. He has fond memories of games like Lemonade Stand, Oregon Trail, and Math Munchers (and points out that some teachers are still using these game in their classrooms). These games were simple, effective, and totally engaging. Playpower would like to bring back the experience of trekking across the planes or building a neighborhood empire out of squeezed fruit. “Teens love these indie games. They get it. And not simply because they are ‘retro’.” It seems the field is ripe for educators to turn back to development: An audience that loves the style; A platform with restraints (limited graphics, RAM, etc.) that actually benefit the home developer. The only piece missing is a central place where geeky teachers can go to solicit help, learn the language, and share their goods. Playpower wants to develop that place. Lomas’ first project is to pull together/create a set of tools for a “$10 computer“. That computer, […]