There is a law that says if someone is passed out or so **** faced they cannot say "I permit you to have sexual intercourse with me." It is considered rape. If a girl is drunk and is too wobbly to run away it is still considered rape. Just because she "Put herself" in a vulnerable position it doesn't justify the acts of the attacker.

Of course. Let's absolve women of all responsibility. After all, they can only be victims and never accountable for their own choices despite what those choices lead to. I mean, getting ********* to the point of having completely impaired judgment wasn't really HER choice now was it?

So it stands to reason that women, like children, are incapable of being accountable and responsible for their own choices despite the consequences. They can only be the victim in any scenario in which where they are forced to face negative outcomes of their behavior. It follows then, they should forfeit the privileges afforded only to adults. You can't accept responsibility like an adult, then you don't get to do what adults do.

No? Too sexist for you?

Then either:
A. Don't put yourself in situations where you will be easily exploited.
B. Own the **** up to your own life choices and the consequences they yield. Nothing in life is consequence-free.

Are you a poor, defenseless little girl in need of protection and security from external sources? Or are you a strong, independent adult capable of taking responsibility and being held accountable? You cannot be both.

Did you read a word of what I said?
If someone is drunk and says yes its not rape. But if someone is passed out and has not consented just because she "put herself in the situation" It does not justify the acts of the rapist.

Cause and effect.
If I place my wallet on a park bench and go take a nap, it would be no shock to wake up and find my wallet is gone. It would be absurd to say that I didn't bring it upon myself by not taking the proper precautions. No one made me take out my wallet and place it on the bench. No one forced that girl to drink so ******* much that she passes out. Even if roofies were involved, leaving your drink unattended in a bar to allow someone the opportunity to do that is questionable judgement at best. (unless you're saying that women, again like children, are incapable of exhibiting sound judgement)
You are right, though. It does not justify the acts of the perpetrator but without the cause, which she initiated on her OWN accord, there can be NO EFFECT. Life isn't sunshine and daisies and chasing happiness without consequence. If you wanna get ********* plastered, unless someone is FORCING the alcohol down your throat, it would be absurd to absolve yourself of all responsibility for actions influenced by alcohol. I am not saying blame the victim or assuming the perpetrator isn't also guilty of wrong-doing, but to say that the woman gets wake up the next morning with buyer's remorse and blame the man 100% would be to suppose she is incapable of judgment and responsibility. Attributes of adulthood and maturity.
So again, are you a poor, defenseless victim, or strong and capable?

Well, you may say that I live in an ideal world, but I don't think that should be the standard. And if you agree that it does not justify the acts of perpetrator then I'm not sure what you're arguing. I still think you're miss understanding me.

I'm not nor have I have I ever been a feminist. I do not believe in "gender superiority" Nor do I believe its even necessary to define as "strong and independent woman" as that seems like something an insecure person would say. Does that answer your question.

It doesn't.
I just find it curious that one can get drunk and whomever that person has sex with is pretty much at the mercy of the potential "victim". No one ever thinks to consider that perhaps every drunken, sexual encounter doesn't automatically entitle the female to victim-hood.

You're completely misunderstanding.
This analogy is fallacious.
Having a wallet and phone on you is not analogous to being in a self-induced, drunken state.
A better analogy would be that the "victim" here gave their wallet and phone to the "mugger" and later pressed chargers after willingly handing over those possessions.
The defendant would get laughed out of the courtroom in such a situation.