Can Windows 7 Catch up to KDE?

Marketing Hype, Actual Features

October 27, 2009

By
Bruce Byfield

As a devoted free software user, I'm almost as likely to stick my hand down a running
garbarator as buy a copy of Windows 7. In fact, so far, I haven't tried Windows 7. But if
its features
list is any indication, I'm missing little that I don't already have with the latest
version of the KDE desktop.

Of course, exactly what Windows 7's new features are can be difficult to tell. The
features list is as much a marketing document as a technical one. In places it's more apt
to give you an overdose of adjectives than any specifics. Nor is every feature available
in every edition of Windows 7.

Then, too, a few listed features, such as 64-bit
support, are so far from new that I wonder why they are mentioned.

Another difficulty is the sheer scope of the comparison. A desktop is a big place, and
you can easily miss features because on one desktop they are part of a default
installation and on another they are an option squirreled away beneath several layers of
menus.

Still, when such matters are taken into account, in terms of features, Windows 7
appears a minor upgrade at best. Judging from the advertising, it has no killer apps that
outperform KDE, and its few unique features may turn out to be oddities rather than
genuinely useful features.

Windows 7 bests KDE mainly in administrative tools, and even here the advantage is
counter-balanced by standard features that KDE has had for years.

Desktop experiences

The most important feature that Windows 7 has and KDE lacks appears to be BitLocker,
a utility for driver encryption. By contrast, while a feature for directory encryption is
just being introduced in an unpolished form in Ubuntu, so far, no corresponding tool is
standard with most distributions, let alone with KDE.

Otherwise, the difference on the desktop is slim. In fact in many cases, Windows 7 is
just catching up to KDE.

Translucencies? Animations? Thumbnail previews of applications on the taskbar? KDE
already has them, although Windows 7 does add to the usability of previews by allowing
you to view them full-screen.

The same goes for widgets -- or gadgets, as
Windows 7 calls them. The feature lists boasts that these minor utilities are no longer
confined to a taskbar and can now be placed anywhere on the desktop, but that's old news
to KDE users.

Ditto for running applications from the taskbar. As for measurement conversions, the
only difference is that KDE has been doing them in KRunner and Windows 7 does them in its
calculator.

Move on to applications, and in many cases Windows 7 is still behind. Why would anyone
consider the clutter of Windows Media Player when they could use the rich feature sets of
Amarok or Digikam? Windows Media Player would have to be utterly
transformed to compete seriously against applications that are the ultimate in their
categories.

And use Internet Explorer instead of Firefox? Whether you are talking in terms of
native features or the ecosystems of extensions built around them, Internet Explorer is
barely in the running, especially if you want to do things exactly your way.

Yet, despite all the attention they are receiving, these sound like small features:
Peek turns all open windows translucent, so that you can see the desktop, while with
Shake you can jiggle the mouse to make all except the active window disappear. Yet
another solution for desktop chaos is embodied in Snap, which allows you to drag windows
to the edges of the desktop to resize and position them.

While such features may astonish Windows users, for KDE users, these are only specific
implementations of features that they already know -- translucencies, mouse gestures and
hot spots on the edges.

The features may not be available for exactly the same purposes as in Windows 7, but
they are recognizably the same technology -- for instance, you can make a window
translucent as you move it to see what is beneath.

Nor are they the only ways to move and organize windows, as browsing through the
wealth of settings in KDE's Windows Behavior settings soon proves. You might very well be
better able to organize your desktop just as effectively without Peek, Shake, or
Snap.

I suspect, too, that Shake and Snap in particular are going to alarm users who move
the mouse in a careless moment and see their open windows disappear or change size. But
even if that is not so, the point is that Windows 7 is advertising nothing on the desktop
that KDE either does not have or could not easily add if anyone cared to make the
effort.

Administration Tools versus Still-Missing Features

In some cases, such as wireless connections, Windows 7 and KDE offer almost identical
tools. Still, there is no denying that, compared to earlier releases, the KDE 4.x series
is still light in administration tools. Under these circumstances, it is not surprising
that Windows 7 has parental controls and location-specific printing, but KDE does not
seem to be even working on parental controls, and is scheduled to introduce geolocation features over the
next couple of releases.

Most Popular LinuxPlanet Stories

Advertiser Disclosure:
Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which QuinStreet receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. QuinStreet does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.