We wish to welcome you to this section
of the silentlambs website. The purpose of this area is to offer
examples of "true" Watchtower Policy for everyone to
see. New information will be added on a regular basis to show
a reality the Society hides from its members and the public that
protects "Watchtower Image" over and above the interests
of the flock. Each item presented here has been double checked
for accuracy and the sources have been talked to personally to
make sure what is being presented is the simple truth of the matter.

NO
COMPASSION FOR VICTORIA BOER - Latest newsletter
(click here) The following is a letter recently written by
Watchtower of UK regarding the Vicky Boer judgment in Canada.
The letter is misleading as usual in that Watchtower attorneys
petitioned the court for legal costs in an apparent attempt to
punish her. The letter seems in indicate the court forced
the legal costs upon them as a result of law once again compassion
for abuse survivors is hard to find when "theocratic warfare"
is employed to mislead the public. (click
here) to read letter. (click
here) to read about the Vicky Boer case. If you would
like to write a letter or email to express your outrage at this
decision (click here) for information
on how to do so. Transcript
court case

ANDERS EXCOMMUNICATED!
Anders
the young man that appeared on the television program in Sweden
was recently excommunicated without an hearing. Read what
appears to be a new Governing Body directive on how to deal
with abuse survivors [click
here] Also read the letter Anders wrote to the
Swedish Branch after they spent thousands of dollars to assassinate
him in the media. [click
here]

WATCHTOWER ATTACKS ABUSE SURVIVORS-LIES
TO CONGREGATIONS AND MEDIA IN SWEDEN!-In
a recent letter sent out in Sweden Watchtower accuses Swedish
Television of lying and says they are going to sue. One abuse
survivor is singled out and personal misinformation is given
about his abuse. To see the letter sent to congregations and
media [CLICK
HERE] [PDF
ACTUAL SCAN] to
see the "actual facts" [CLICK
HERE] See Swedish Branch Office response to
abuse survivor's mother [CLICK
HERE] See Original [click
here]

WT MEDIA COVERUP AND MISINFORMATION-
Ten documentaries have aired around the world
show numerous examples of members in good standing that have
been hurt by current Watchtower Policy. Around the world
various measures have been taken to punish the innocent and
cover up the truth. There is an interesting trail of documentation
that shows what lengths will be followed to misinform the public,
to review this information: [CLICKHERE]

MEDIA SHUTDOWN-A letter
written to all congregation in USA effectively shuts down any
chance of media being provided information on anything about
Jehovah's Witnesses. It is interesting to note in the latter
portion of the letter it makes the statement:

"If researchers or others
approach elders seeking information and some issues come
up about which the elders are not certain, they should not
make any comments. Rather, these inquiries should be referred
to the Service Department, at the address above, for attention.'

We are confident
that this direction will be sufficient for you to provide
an appropriate response to anyone who approaches the congregation
with an inquiry or survey about the work we do in the community
and worldwide."

So if anyone is
not sure of any question asked, what are they encouraged to
do? Nothing, just call Watchtower and let them handle it.
Now Witnesses are not allowed to say anything to the public.
Only an authorized elder can make any comment and if it is
a question he is not absolutely sure of, he is not allowed
to say anything. So much for freedom of speech...

MURDER LETTER-Does
The Watchtower Society believe that criminals should be reported
to the proper authorities? What if the person committed crimes
before they were baptized, would there be any responsibility
to report crimes confessed to elders in private? What if a person
committed murder, would the Watchtower Society do what was morally
and ethically right to set matters right with the law? Would
the Society see the criminal’s side and protect them,
or see the victim’s side and move to avoid obstruction
of justice? If Watchtower has this view toward murders how could
this apply to child molesters?

Read the following letter and see how you would answer these
questions. [CLICK HERE]

MOLESTER ELDERS-If
you read the January 1, 1997 Watchtower article you are given
the impression that a child molester who is “known”(that
is confessed) would never have “privileges” in the
Congregation arrangement. Is that really the case? In a conversation
with the Service Department it was plainly stated to me personally
that a child molester could re-qualify again after a long period
of time had passed. Was this a misstatement of Watchtower Policy?
Read the form letter sent out to congregations by the Legal
Department in cases of “known” child molesters.
Notice the paragraph at the end holds open the possibility of
being used again after writing the Society first. So the question
is who is lying, the Writing Department who wrote the 97 Watchtower,
Service Department, or Legal Department? Either way you are
being lied to.

KEY WT POLICY LETTER-This
British letter was sent to all elders in the United Kingdom
when controversy arose on how child molesters should be handled
in the congregation. The letter was directed by New York to
put everyone on the "same page" regarding how abuse
allegations were to be handled. Here it clearly states child
molesters are serving as elders in the congregation and when
children are interrogated the untrained elders must determine
uncleanness, loose conduct, or porneia.[CLICK
HERE]
Scanned Image of Actual Document - [ PAGE
1] [ PAGE
2]

HOW LONG HAS WT KNOWN?-
How long has Watchtower known proper policy on abuse?
Canada letter from 1988 documents clear understanding of the
importance of reporting abuse. Why was this policy never
followed as stated? [CLICK
HERE]

UNITED KINGDOM- Silentlambs
traveled to UK to meet with the Branch committee about the abuse
issue, what was the response?[CLICK
HERE]