Sci-Fi speaks of Planet X - (Scientists refer to 'planet x' as an unknown - a planet they suspect but have not found) - The ancients speak of the Planet of the CROSSing - Some called him the Bearded one, some called him NIBIRU, Who orbits a DARK STAR they name as NEMESIS. Others may be reminded of WORMWOOD.

Very many known stars are BINARY and some have speculated, for some time now, that we may have our own DARK TWIN SUN - Most talking of a Brown Dwarf - Some call it a BLACK DWARF:

Is this where some of the 'missing' Dark Matter of the universe is?Could Nemesis be the share of the Dark Matter 'missing' from our Solar System?Could Nemesis be paying one of its infrequent visits? Bringing Nibiru along too?

Could the mass of such an 'object' hold a 140 Meter diameter satellite (that is as wide as the length of nearly 3 Olympic swimming pools) in its orbit?Could this orbit take the satellite through the tail?What could the tail be made of?Photons?

Could the density of such an object perturb our solar system's planets, magnetospheres, our Sun, our tectonic plates and volcanos?Could this object be as close as Mars? [link to s847.photobucket.com]

Could we expect more quakes?Crustal shift?Electro Magnetic Pulses from the Sun?Gama Waves? ( Is this why the temperature stays sub-zero while the permafrost melts?)Days of rotational Stasis?

Munchaab hopes not, but is off to buy a whole bunch of tinned beans!

Peace and respect to all!Pose your own thoughts, ideas and questions - we may be the collective mind that can find the answers!

Sci-Fi speaks of Planet X - (Scientists refer to 'planet x' as an unknown - a planet they suspect but have not found) - The ancients speak of the Planet of the CROSSing - Some called him the Bearded one, some called him NIBIRU, Who orbits a DARK STAR they name as NEMESIS. Others may be reminded of WORMWOOD.

Very many known stars are BINARY and some have speculated, for some time now, that we may have our own DARK TWIN SUN - Most talking of a Brown Dwarf - Some call it a BLACK DWARF:

Is this where some of the 'missing' Dark Matter of the universe is?Could Nemesis be the share of the Dark Matter 'missing' from our Solar System?Could Nemesis be paying one of its infrequent visits? Bringing Nibiru along too?

Could the mass of such an 'object' hold a 140 Meter diameter satellite (that is as wide as the length of nearly 3 Olympic swimming pools) in its orbit?Could this orbit take the satellite through the tail?What could the tail be made of?Photons?

Could the density of such an object perturb our solar system's planets, magnetospheres, our Sun, our tectonic plates and volcanos?Could this object be as close as Mars? [link to s847.photobucket.com]

Could we expect more quakes?Crustal shift?Electro Magnetic Pulses from the Sun?Gama Waves? ( Is this why the temperature stays sub-zero while the permafrost melts?)Days of rotational Stasis?

Could we expect more quakes?Crustal shift?Electro Magnetic Pulses from the Sun?Gama Waves? ( Is this why the temperature stays sub-zero while the permafrost melts?)Days of rotational Stasis?

Munchaab hopes not, but is off to buy a whole bunch of tinned beans!

Peace and respect to all!

Quoting: Munchaab

What we will create with our minds, collectively, is the real question isn't it?

However, I believe that those who have learned to be 'One with the Light(creative source), are ahead of the game: Remember, "Just One Lighted being, can counter the effects of millions of dark energies!"

I am guessing Kepler's laws dictate that if two binary stars draw closer, then the objects in orbit of the binary stars will respectively draw closer within their orbits, as would all orbiting objects, though their orbits remain the same, if the binary star idea is true, then all planetoids will experience a contraction in the diameter of their orbit as the two major stars draw closer. So that means the moon would similarly draw closer to the Earth, and then draw away after the binary star moves past perihelion (in relation to its twin) and then begins the away-cycle. All orbits would contract, is what I am saying. There would be no orbit around either star nor moon around any planet around those stars, whose orbit would not contract with the drawing-close.

I am guessing Kepler's laws dictate that if two binary stars draw closer, then the objects in orbit of the binary stars will respectively draw closer within their orbits, as would all orbiting objects, though their orbits remain the same, if the binary star idea is true, then all planetoids will experience a contraction in the diameter of their orbit as the two major stars draw closer. So that means the moon would similarly draw closer to the Earth, and then draw away after the binary star moves past perihelion (in relation to its twin) and then begins the away-cycle. All orbits would contract, is what I am saying. There would be no orbit around either star nor moon around any planet around those stars, whose orbit would not contract with the drawing-close.

Thanks OP, keep your eyes open.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 874976

Could this diminution occur in the size of planets etc too?

Time may feel like it was getting faster for some but as everything in the system was undergoing the same contraction or diminution would most notice?Just an increase in frequencies maybe - A musical note 'A' is a smaller sound an octave higher - It is the same note but the frequency (or vibration) has doubled.

The idea was not from the thread - I've been studying this sort of thing for 30 years (yup since age 7 - Nostdamus etc. got me going after I realised the priest was a drunk Irish fraud) and it's all starting to fall into place.

Your thread, however, did inspire me to share my thoughts/questions at this time - so big thanks as it helped a few things from the past to come to recall to fill in some spaces!

I think my mission has always been to find out what I can, about what is real - not what I'm told. I now feel I should share but do not want to upset anyone who is not ready for what could be HUGE change (including my wife - who does NOT want to know!) especially as I operate on a level of speculation - few facts sometimes, that 'sphere in the dark' is visible to me but I don't know it is there!

I'm on UTC so will read you links in a few hour when I rise and get back.

Thanks again!!!

I want the use of ALL of my brain!"I hate the idea of yesterday being a replay of tomorrow!".Because UK revolution matters too...The Love Police: [link to www.youtube.com]

However, I believe that those who have learned to be 'One with the Light(creative source), are ahead of the game: Remember, "Just One Lighted being, can counter the effects of millions of dark energies!"

Didn't I read that NASA added color because we wouldn't be able to see under it's real spectrum, I'm referring to - P2010 A2 LINEAR

Wouldn't it be interesting if they did release the true version, once downloaded try numerous adjustments with in a good quality photo software program.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 739448

Very good point.I am wondering too in wich way we still can trust the released digital images. We know now that the moon and Mars images are coloured in ... such a fraud and shame !!!!

If they use colouring to make something visable (wich is understandable) they also should release the origional image(s) !

An other thing with digital imaging is : is the "hot-pixel" also always a hot-pixel ? or can it be mistaken for it while in fact it is an unknown object ?compression artifacts may also be unknown things (in magnetic-electrical-material-frequency ways) ... and that the equipment is trying to translate it with the data that is known, but maybe not sufficient to register the unknown object.Maybe it is translated as a bunch of squares, while in real out there in space that is not even close to the real thing.Maybe several images (ways of registering the spectrum : micro-wave, ultra violet, near infra red, etc..) should be layered upon each other to make it visable in its true nature ... maybe in a single image it is not comming close like it is out there in space.How true are the images we see?How much is lost?How much is adjusted and photoshoped?

The BasicsIn this day and age there is no longer any doubt that electrical effects in plasmas play an important role in the phenomena we observe on the Sun. The major properties of the "Electric Sun (ES) model" are as follows: Most of the space within our galaxy is occupied by plasma (rarefied ionized gas) containing electrons (negative charges) and ionized atoms (positive charges). Every charged particle in the plasma has an electric potential energy (voltage) just as every pebble on a mountain has a mechanical potential energy with respect to sea level. The Sun is surrounded by a plasma cell that stretches far out - many times the radius of Pluto. These are facts not hypotheses. The Sun is at a more positive electrical potential (voltage) than is the space plasma surrounding it - probably in the order of 10 billion volts. Positive ions leave the Sun and electrons enter the Sun. Both of these flows add to form a net positive current leaving the Sun. This constitutes a plasma discharge analogous in every way (except size) to those that have been observed in electrical plasma laboratories for decades. Because of the Sun's positive charge (voltage), it acts as the anode in a plasma discharge. As such, it exhibits many of the phenomena observed in earthbound plasma experiments, such as anode tufting. The granules observed on the surface of the photosphere are anode tufts (plasma in the arc mode). The Sun may be powered, not from within itself, but from outside, by the electric (Birkeland) currents that flow in our arm of our galaxy as they do in all galaxies. This possibility that the Sun may be exernally powered by its galactic environment is the most speculative idea in the ES hypothesis and is always attacked by critics while they ignore all the other explanatory properties of the ES model. In the Plasma Universe model, these cosmic sized, low-density currents create the galaxies and the stars within those galaxies by the electromagnetic z-pinch effect. It is only a small extrapolation to ask whether these currents remain to power those stars. Galactic currents are of low current density, but, because the sizes of the stars are large, the total current (Amperage) is high. The Sun's radiated power at any instant is due to the energy imparted by that amperage. As the Sun moves around the galactic center it may come into regions of higher or lower current density and so its output may vary both periodically and randomly.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 889323

WOW this has realy potential !Even though I do not fully understand everything yet as short as it is writen, but my internal compass is telling me there is much truth in this.

It could then be that instead of expanding becoz of a big bang (a PUSH-force), the stars and galaxies are being pulled (a pull-force) towards what you are talking about !*there was a video about a stonecarving with the sun-representing human/a god in the middle and a ring/rope around it with little people pulling on each side, the light and the dark was translated as good and evil but I would better translate that as the light-sun and (the companion) dark-sun (dwarf)*

So the plasma could be seen as "food" that makes the engine drive (the sun for example), providing it, thats why sunspotarcs go back inward .. they may be transporting this food-plasma to the core. This also is the yin-yang principle.

There is much more activity on the farside of the sun then on the earthside ... something is bombarding it : a highly charged electrical plasma field/cloud ?

It might be possible that the plasmacloud is on the one side and the dark dwarf on the other side, both attributing pushing and pulling forces that make this solarsystem (as we knew it untill now) change.It's the positive charges and negative charges that are playing out their role, like magnetics are also everything about push and pull.

It might be possible that the plasmacloud is on the one side and the dark dwarf on the other side, both attributing pushing and pulling forces that make this solarsystem (as we knew it untill now) change.It's the positive charges and negative charges that are playing out their role, like magnetics are also everything about push and pull.

Hmmmm, can you still follow this giberish ? ......

Quoting: Krispy71

Oh yeah! and you (as always get a prize )

I am really not sure either but ancient texts point us toward solar pole reversal that will impact earth - followed by fire-flood etc.

These orbs are to find the answer I'm sure - I postulated that the sun was 'spitting up' - what if the sun is not 'giving' but 'receiving' - going through an energy plane that causes perturbations?

Could the plane be the Electromagnetic discharge stream between the two bodies (even if one is not visible but very dense?) that is causing the visual problem?

I want the use of ALL of my brain!"I hate the idea of yesterday being a replay of tomorrow!".Because UK revolution matters too...The Love Police: [link to www.youtube.com]

It might be possible that the plasmacloud is on the one side and the dark dwarf on the other side, both attributing pushing and pulling forces that make this solarsystem (as we knew it untill now) change.It's the positive charges and negative charges that are playing out their role, like magnetics are also everything about push and pull.

Hmmmm, can you still follow this giberish ? ...... Quoting: Krispy71

Oh yeah! and you (as always get a prize )

I am really not sure either but ancient texts point us toward solar pole reversal that will impact earth - followed by fire-flood etc.

These orbs are to find the answer I'm sure - I postulated that the sun was 'spitting up' - what if the sun is not 'giving' but 'receiving' - going through an energy plane that causes perturbations?

Could the plane be the Electromagnetic discharge stream between the two bodies (even if one is not visible but very dense?) that is causing the visual problem?

Quoting: Munchaab

She must be doing both I guess ...On NASA satelite-movies it realy looks as if sometimes little white (from hot? or only from spectral light?) orbs are comming out of active sunspots; the "spitting up" ... It could be that what she absorbs is not visable and that the output is (in some ranges of the known spectrum) visable as plasma-orbs or magnetic-energy-orbs.lol... : feed , digest, and shit out hahahahaha ;)

And maybe the rimples (ringing/buzzing) of the sun on the NoRH 17 GHz is the effect of the push and pull-factor from the plasma cloud and the dark dwarf .... and could be cauzing also effects on earth in the presure of the tectonic plates, the magnetism in the sky (airplane disturbances). Just prior to an earthquake there are coloured lights that are withnessed : the release of energy out of the earths crust that are in fact magnetic particles and maybe more (I dont know the terminologies, sorry). Maybe they become like clouds and not orbs because we have a different enviroment then on the sun and out in space ....Just some thoughts ;)

Sci-Fi speaks of Planet X - (Scientists refer to 'planet x' as an unknown - a planet they suspect but have not found) - The ancients speak of the Planet of the CROSSing - Some called him the Bearded one, some called him NIBIRU, Who orbits a DARK STAR they name as NEMESIS. Others may be reminded of WORMWOOD.

Very many known stars are BINARY and some have speculated, for some time now, that we may have our own DARK TWIN SUN - Most talking of a Brown Dwarf - Some call it a BLACK DWARF:

Is this where some of the 'missing' Dark Matter of the universe is?Could Nemesis be the share of the Dark Matter 'missing' from our Solar System?Could Nemesis be paying one of its infrequent visits? Bringing Nibiru along too?

Could the mass of such an 'object' hold a 140 Meter diameter satellite (that is as wide as the length of nearly 3 Olympic swimming pools) in its orbit?Could this orbit take the satellite through the tail?What could the tail be made of?Photons?

Could the density of such an object perturb our solar system's planets, magnetospheres, our Sun, our tectonic plates and volcanos?Could this object be as close as Mars? [link to s847.photobucket.com]

Could we expect more quakes?Crustal shift?Electro Magnetic Pulses from the Sun?Gama Waves? ( Is this why the temperature stays sub-zero while the permafrost melts?)Days of rotational Stasis?

Munchaab hopes not, but is off to buy a whole bunch of tinned beans!

Peace and respect to all!Pose your own thoughts, ideas and questions - we may be the collective mind that can find the answers!

I am guessing Kepler's laws dictate that if two binary stars draw closer, then the objects in orbit of the binary stars will respectively draw closer within their orbits, as would all orbiting objects, though their orbits remain the same, if the binary star idea is true, then all planetoids will experience a contraction in the diameter of their orbit as the two major stars draw closer. So that means the moon would similarly draw closer to the Earth, and then draw away after the binary star moves past perihelion (in relation to its twin) and then begins the away-cycle. All orbits would contract, is what I am saying. There would be no orbit around either star nor moon around any planet around those stars, whose orbit would not contract with the drawing-close.

Thanks OP, keep your eyes open.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 874976

There's a name sake out there with an ambiguous mission I would surmise.

John 3:16 (Amplified Bible)“For God so greatly loved and dearly prized the world that He [even] gave up His only begotten ([a]unique) Son, so that whoever believes in (trusts in, clings to, relies on) Him shall not perish (come to destruction, be lost) but have eternal (everlasting) life.

A prudent person foresees the danger ahead and takes precautions;the simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences-Proverbs22:3 <><