On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Walker<dwalker@fifo99.com> wrote:>> For example the msm7k SoC code may need some various cleanup, but I>> think at the end of the day adding support for a new ARM based SoC and>> peripherals is not going to be that contentious. The>> wakelock/suspendblock stuff is a bit further out there, but there>> seemed to be some good progress on getting it reviewed and revised on>> the linux-pm list, last I saw.>> Do you have a msm branch someplace that is strictly msm support with> absolutely no generic changes mixed in?

Unfortunately, no. However, the generic changes tend to beself-contained (binder, logger, etc) and not necessary for core msm7ksupport. The one set of changes that does touch both generic andplatform code is the wakelock/suspendblock stuff, which some of thedrivers make use of, but that's usually not very invasive.