C'mon Sly, You know you were fapping to the godaddy commercial only to go limp when it revealed to be Joan Rivers.... then again knowing you, you probably kept right on going.

February 8th, 2011, 2:14 am

regularjoe12

Off. Coordinator – Joe Lombardi

Joined: March 30th, 2006, 12:48 amPosts: 4006Location: Davison Mi

Re: Racy Superbowl Ad Shot down by Fox.

slybri19 wrote:

I was very disappointed in the ads this year. The little Darth Vader one was great, along with a couple from Bud Light and Doritos, but the rest sucked! Next year, I DEMAND to see more scantily clad women promoting products that we don't remember what they were endorsing once the commercial is over.

I'm gonna take the complaints one step further.....Did niether team have cheerleaders this year?? NOT ONE camera pan to a single cheerleader this year. I was thinkin at least durring hafltime i'd at least get to oggle Fergie's legs..but the 1/2time show sucked too! I give the superbowl side show a c-

Way behind on this one because I haven't really even checked the forum in months (I haven't been looking at the usual football forums much lately with the lockout...then I realized LB usually has very heavy conversation off topic and unlike certain larger sites I won't name actually allow you to talk about the fun stuff).

But I just couldn't resist this...How is God "speaking for himself" in a book written by men? Isn't that quite literally someone else speaking for him?

I won't turn it into a debate on how true or not anything in the bible is or if there is or isn't a god but I just figured I had to post a chuckle response to that.

...Again not meant to spark discussion on the legitimacy of claims in the bible or anything of the sort, just pointing out that it was literally an example of someone speaking for God which I found a little funny:P

April 7th, 2011, 6:19 pm

steensn

RIP Killer

Joined: June 26th, 2006, 1:03 pmPosts: 13429

Re: Racy Superbowl Ad Shot down by Fox.

Rob_Shadows wrote:

...Again not meant to spark discussion on the legitimacy of claims in the bible or anything of the sort, just pointing out that it was literally an example of someone speaking for God which I found a little funny:P

That is just the problem, you made a claim questioning the legitimacy of the Bible. I made a claim based on my faith, you can question the legitimacy of what I believe the Bible to be, I don't mind, join the club. But you are making a stretch to make a point and not focusing on what was presented and the claim the Bible makes of itself. If you disagree with that claim, feel free to. but don't try and fish for logical fallacies by creating a confliction that doesn't exist in my assumptions.

Our assumptions (axiums) are in conflict, not what I said. If we can't agree on that then all you are going to do is jab here and there and it'll just end in a mess. If you don't intend to question the Bible, then don't...

...Again not meant to spark discussion on the legitimacy of claims in the bible or anything of the sort, just pointing out that it was literally an example of someone speaking for God which I found a little funny:P

That is just the problem, you made a claim questioning the legitimacy of the Bible. I made a claim based on my faith, you can question the legitimacy of what I believe the Bible to be, I don't mind, join the club. But you are making a stretch to make a point and not focusing on what was presented and the claim the Bible makes of itself. If you disagree with that claim, feel free to. but don't try and fish for logical fallacies by creating a confliction that doesn't exist in my assumptions.

Our assumptions (axiums) are in conflict, not what I said. If we can't agree on that then all you are going to do is jab here and there and it'll just end in a mess. If you don't intend to question the Bible, then don't...

Lol, you christians are so touchy! it's cute and at times somewhat annoying...but as the good book says I still love ya steensn

I honestly didn't mean it in a way disputing the word of the bible, I was simply pointing out that even in the event that the word is truth it was men that wrote that message for god and not god himself. It was a comment meant in complete jest with no hidden agenda, I may have worded it in a way that sounded condescending and if that's the case I apologize. I stress again I was merely pointing out that the bible was written by humans delivering the word of god and thus god literally spoke through others, that's all...