On 9 Jul 2012, at 09:11, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> crt3.o: $(srcdir)/config/darwin-crt3.c
> regstrapped (all+ada+objc++) on i686-darwin9 with no regressions.
.. but, now I re-check, crt3 is only used on Darwin 8 and earlier;
That will take somewhat longer to check, machine availability is an issue - I'll see if I can run up a i686 or ppc darwin8 box.
Iain

Hi Steven,
On 9 Jul 2012, at 09:21, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> On 9 Jul 2012, at 09:11, Iain Sandoe wrote:>>> crt3.o: $(srcdir)/config/darwin-crt3.c> >> regstrapped (all+ada+objc++) on i686-darwin9 with no regressions.> > .. but, now I re-check, crt3 is only used on Darwin 8 and earlier; > That will take somewhat longer to check, machine availability is an issue - I'll see if I can run up a i686 or ppc darwin8 box.
Looking at the original PR it seems that the problem was fixed on the same day that the work-around (which your patch removes) was checked in.
I've only done c/c++, should be enough for this.
Anyway, although i686-Darwin 8 is sadly in need of some TLC, the proposed patch causes no regressions.
ppc-darwin 8 tests are still running, but it bootstrapped (500M G4, > 24hrs for c/c++ build & test).
Iain.

On 11 Jul 2012, at 00:01, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Anyway, although i686-Darwin 8 is sadly in need of some TLC, the proposed patch causes no regressions.> ppc-darwin 8 tests are still running, but it bootstrapped (500M G4, > 24hrs for c/c++ build & test).
FAOD, from a testing perspective this is fine - but it needs Mike's OK,
cheers
Iain

On Jul 13, 2012, at 12:28 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> On 11 Jul 2012, at 00:01, Iain Sandoe wrote:>> Anyway, although i686-Darwin 8 is sadly in need of some TLC, the proposed patch causes no regressions.>> ppc-darwin 8 tests are still running, but it bootstrapped (500M G4, > 24hrs for c/c++ build & test).> > FAOD, from a testing perspective this is fine - but it needs Mike's OK,
Hum, no, it doesn't, it has already been approved by Paolo, and I don't disagree with that approval.... :-)

On 14 Jul 2012, at 00:21, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2012, at 12:28 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:>> On 11 Jul 2012, at 00:01, Iain Sandoe wrote:>>> Anyway, although i686-Darwin 8 is sadly in need of some TLC, the proposed patch causes no regressions.>>> ppc-darwin 8 tests are still running, but it bootstrapped (500M G4, > 24hrs for c/c++ build & test).>> >> FAOD, from a testing perspective this is fine - but it needs Mike's OK,> > Hum, no, it doesn't, it has already been approved by Paolo, and I don't disagree with that approval.... :-)
apologies, I missed a post.