Notorious Qaddafi henchman was Monitor's point man in Libya

By now, you're probably familiar with the background surrounding Monitor Group's involvement with the Qaddafi regime in Libya: cash—and lots of it—for PR work on behalf of The Mad Dog himself. Unfortunately for the Cambridge-based strategy outfit, this particular PR project has turned into a bona fide PR nightmare.

Muammar Qaddafi's brother-in-law and purported right hand man, Sanusi gained international notoriety after a French court convicted him in absentia for his role as the "ringleader" in a plot to bomb a commercial airplane over Niger. That plot went live in 1989, killing 170 innocent passengers aboard French airliner UTA 772.

The Boston Globe reports today that Sanusi was also the ringleader of Monitor's consulting engagement with the Libyan government. "In 2006," the Globe writes, "Abdullah Al Sanusi was also the man who arranged the services of a noted Cambridge consulting firm in a very different project: revamping Libya’s reputation on the world stage."

According to documents acquired and published by the Libyan opposition, Mark Fuller, Monitor's CEO, wrote to Sanusi in 2006: "We believe that your commitment to creating a program of mutual education and relationship building with the United States remains of critical importance at this turning point in Libyan history. We remain privileged to be trusted with this work."

He also requested the "immediate payment" of roughly $1.4 million. CNN reports that Monitor earned more than $3 million per year for the engagement.

The Globe reports that, as Qaddafi's proxy, Sanusi "oversaw initial negotiations with the Monitor Group" when the pair decided to do business in 2006. When the consultancy arranged for prominent American academics to visit Libya (who would subsequently publish complimentary articles on Qaddafi and Libya), Sanusi served as the main contact between the visitors and the regime. Benjamin Barber, a Rutgers professor who went to Libya on behalf of Monitor Group, suggested that working with Sanusi was a necessary evil. "I'm not saying that he is a good guy, but he was very pro-American," said Barber.

After the 1989 airliner bombing, the pro-American thug further consolidated his reputation as Qaddafi's ruthless lapdog at a Benghazi prison in 1996. From the Boston Globe:

In 1996, when political prisoners in Benghazi rioted against the conditions in the prison, Sanusi arrived at the site “in a dark green Audi with a contingent of security personnel,’’ according to the Human Rights Watch report.

At first, Sanusi tried to negotiate an end to the prison uprising, the report said, but then an estimated 1,200 prisoners were killed with grenades and heavy weaponry, and wounded prisoners were shot in the head.

As the "longtime head of Libya's intelligence services," Sanusi has undoubtedly played a major role in the current conflict in Libya. In fact, the Globe says that Sanusi was "recently accused of orchestrating atrocities against antigovernment protesters"; at the very least, the publication asserts, he is responsible for training nearly every working Libyan intelligence officer of the last two decades.

Monitor has kept mum on its involvement with Sanusi, preferring to highlight the "period of promise" in which it engaged the Libyan government. "Given the terrible spectacle of Col. Khadafy using force on his own people," the firm said in a statement, "it may be difficult to imagine that just a few years ago many saw a period of promise in Libya."

You may also like...

Featured Companies

X

Comments Policy

Vault.com encourages you to express your opinions and engage in discussions with one another by leaving comments on our site. While we promote an open forum, please follow these guidelines to ensure an enjoyable and welcoming environment for all our readers. Vault.com does not review or moderate all comments but we reserve the right to remove or edit content once posted.

Respect one another. Debates are great, but attacks are not. Please refrain from posting offensive, obscene, threatening or abusive comments. If you personally attack other readers or writers, your comment(s) and responses to those comments may be removed from the discussion. Attacks create a hostile environment that discourages discussion. You are fully responsible for libelous or defamatory comments.

Hate-speech will not be tolerated. Comments containing racism, homophobia, sexism, or any other form of hate-speech have no place on our site.

Keep your language in check. Vulgar posts may offend other readers. Our filters are fairly tolerant, allowing for quite a bit of colorful/questionable language, but too many obscenities may prevent a comment from posting. In addition, in some cases, if a post is still too vulgar, a moderator may later remove or edit it.

Please note that comments may be edited by the moderator for any reason, including but not limited to language.

Stay on topic. Comments should be related to the topic discussed in the associated article or blog post. In order to keep the conversation relevant, off-topic comments may be edited or removed.

Don't impersonate someone else. You may not use a false e-mail address, impersonate any person or entity, or otherwise mislead as to the origin of your comments. If we believe you've impersonated someone else, we reserve the right to remove the comment.

Spam and commercial content will be removed. We do not welcome comments containing copy used for commercial purposes or for soliciting funds. If we see them, we reserve the right to remove them.

Readers may "report" concerns about other reader comments. Please use the "Report Abuse" link to flag inappropriate content. If a reader reports a concern, moderators will try to review that concern as soon as possible. This may take a few days although we hope to review comments more quickly. We do not remove every comment that has been reported and we cannot respond individually to every report.

Stop and think before you comment. We won't remove comments because a reader or writer regrets a post. Please remember that these comments are searchable and a comment history has a long life on the web.

Don't include personal information in your comments. We strongly discourage readers from posting personal information about themselves (ex. address, telephone number, workplace) and reserve the right to remove any comments we find with personal information about other people or that violates a third party's right to privacy.

Complaints about removed comments. We reserve the right to remove comments left to protest a removed comment. Please contact us if you have any complaints about deleted comments.

Repeated abuse of our guidelines may lead to commenting privileges being suspended. If you think you've been banned by mistake, let us know.

For further questions and comments regarding commenting on Vault.com, please contact us.

Get tips on interviewing, networking, resumes, and more directly to your inbox.