Killings of non-animal life are almost always lawful and considered ethically and morally neutral, except insofar as they have a negative effect on humans (e.g., damage to property, destruction of food supplies, etc.).

Killings of non-animal life are almost always lawful and considered ethically and morally neutral, except insofar as they have a negative effect on humans (e.g., damage to property, destruction of food supplies, etc.).

−

==External Links==

+

==External link==

* [http://dwindlinginunbelief.blogspot.com/2006/08/who-has-killed-more-satan-or-god.html Who has killed more - Satan or God?] - The atheist blog ''Dwindling in Unbelief'' analyzes the numbers of deaths attributed to both God and Satan in the Bible, and finds that God comes out way on top: 2,270,365 to 10. (The point spread is really much wider, however, since Satan had God's help for his 10, and mass deaths with no reported numbers, such as the Great Flood, are not factored in.)

* [http://dwindlinginunbelief.blogspot.com/2006/08/who-has-killed-more-satan-or-god.html Who has killed more - Satan or God?] - The atheist blog ''Dwindling in Unbelief'' analyzes the numbers of deaths attributed to both God and Satan in the Bible, and finds that God comes out way on top: 2,270,365 to 10. (The point spread is really much wider, however, since Satan had God's help for his 10, and mass deaths with no reported numbers, such as the Great Flood, are not factored in.)

Revision as of 14:45, 15 October 2007

Killing involves the termination of life by an outside force or agent. When it is brought about by the action (or inaction) of a human being, it may be considered lawful or unlawful. It may also be considered ethical or unethical, or moral or immoral.

The killing of oneself is called suicide. Helping another person to commit suicide is considered unlawful in most modern societies, but not always unethical or even immoral; see the Wikipedia article on euthanasia.

The intentional killing of an unborn human fetus is called abortion. It is a very controversial subject raising many philosophical and legal issues.

Killing of non-humans

The killing of a non-human animal is almost always considered less objectionable (e.g., is more often lawful) than the killing of a human under similar circumstances. In addition, typically the "less human-like" the animal is, the more likely its killing would be lawful and not considered unethical or immoral. For example, the killing of a dog might be unlawful if it involves cruelty, while the killing of an insect or worm might be considered lawful regardless of the method used.

Killings of non-animal life are almost always lawful and considered ethically and morally neutral, except insofar as they have a negative effect on humans (e.g., damage to property, destruction of food supplies, etc.).

External link

Who has killed more - Satan or God? - The atheist blog Dwindling in Unbelief analyzes the numbers of deaths attributed to both God and Satan in the Bible, and finds that God comes out way on top: 2,270,365 to 10. (The point spread is really much wider, however, since Satan had God's help for his 10, and mass deaths with no reported numbers, such as the Great Flood, are not factored in.)