In October 1989, I was invited to present a
paper on the “Authority of Sunnah” in an international conference held in
Chicago by an international Islamic organization.

Since long, I had felt the need of a brief English booklet containing basic
information on “The Sunnah of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam),”
its general features, the nature of its authority and the standard of its
authenticity.

I took the opportunity to fulfill this need and wrote on the subject a little
more detail than was required in a conference of this type.

The present work is the result of the above endeavor. This book is meant for the
general reader who wants to know what the “Sunnah of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam)” is, how does it have a binding authority over all the Muslims
for all times to come, what status has the Holy Qur’ân given to it and what
measures has the Ummah adopted to preserve it for the coming generations.

I hope that this humble effort will provide brief, yet clear, answers to
questions of similar nature and will help understanding the true status of the “Sunnah”
as a source of Islamic Law and as a source of guidance for all Muslims in their
practical lives. It will also assist, I hope, in removing certain doubts
inculcated by a few contemporary writers in respect of the authority of the
Sunnah.

May Almighty Allâh approve of this humble effort, adorn it with His pleasure and
make it beneficial to the readers.

Muhammad Taqi Usmani

Chapter 1

Sunnah: The Second Source of Islamic Law

The Sunnah of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) has been
accepted as an important source of Islamic law, next in importance only to the
Holy Qur’ân. This status of the sunnah has remained unchallenged and undisputed
throughout the centuries. There have been many differences among Muslims in
their juristic opinions, but the authority of the Holy Qur’ân and the Sunnah of
the Holy Prophet () was never denied by any jurist. Leaving aside some scattered
individuals who separated themselves from the main stream of the Muslim
population, nobody has ever refused to accept the Sunnah of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) as a sacred source of the Islamic law.

The position is still the same, but some non-Muslim orientalists and some of
their followers have tried, during the last century to cast some doubts in the
authority or the veracity of Hadîth and to develop a suspicious attitude towards
the Sunnah. That is why some Muslims who are unable to study Islam through its
original sources, when they read such books, often become a bit skeptical in the
subject.

The present article intends, therefore, to provide an objective and simple
account of the SUNNAH based on the original sources of Islamic learning. The
purpose is not to indulge in a hot atmosphere of argumentation which has no
bounds or limits, but to narrate the truth as it stands.

Definition of Sunnah

The Sunnah has been defined by the scholars of the science of Hadîth as follows:

“A word spoken, or an act done, or a confirmation given by the Holy Prophet
Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam).”

“Confirmation” in this definition is termed in Arabic as Taqreer. What is meant
by this term is like somebody said something, or acted in a particular manner,
and his saying or act came to the knowledge of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) and he either confirmed it in express words or remained silent
without given any indication of disapproval. Such silence, being an implied
approval of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is also included in
the term Sunnah.

As the Sunnah, with all its three kinds (saying, act and confirmation) relates
to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam), its true status in Islamic
law cannot be ascertained without ascertaining the status of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) himself.

The Status of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam)

So, the first pertinent question in the subject is: What status does a prophet
occupy when he is sent to the people? Has he no higher a status than that or a
message-carrier or a postman who, after delivering the letter, has no concern
with it whatsoever? The answer is certainly in the negative. The prophets are
not sent merely to deliver the word of Allâh. They are also required to explain
the divine Book, to interpret it, to expound it, to demonstrate the ways of its
application and to present a practical example of its contents. Their duty is
not restricted to reciting the words of the Book, rather they are supposed to
teach it and to train people to run their lives in accordance with its
requirements. The Holy Qur’ân leaves no doubt concerning this point by saying:

Allâh has surely blessed the believers with His favor when He raised in their
midst a Messenger from among themselves, who recites to them His verses and
makes them pure and teaches them the Book and the Wisdom, while they were,
earlier in open error. (3:164)

He (Allâh) is the One who raised up, among the unlettered, a Messenger from
among themselves who recites the verses of Allâh, and makes them pure, and
teaches them the Book and the Wisdom. (62:2)

The same functions were attributed to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) in the prayer of Sayyidna Ibrahim (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) when,
according to the Holy Qur’ân, he prayed:

Our Lord, raise in their midst a messenger from among themselves who recites to
them Your verses and teaches them the Book and the Wisdom and purifies them…
(2:129)

These are the terms of reference given to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) which include four distinct functions and the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) has been entrusted with all of them:

(1) Recitation of the Verses of Allâh.

(2) Teaching the Book of Allâh.

(3) Teaching the Wisdom.

(4) Making the people pure.

Thus, the Holy Qur’ân leaves no ambiguities in the fact that the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is not supposed to merely recite the verses and
then leave it to the people to interpret and apply them in whatever manner they
like. Instead, he is sent to “teach” the Book. Then, since teaching the Book is
not enough, he is also required to teach “Wisdom” which is something additional
to the “Book.” Still, this is not enough, therefore the Holy Prophet () has also
to “make the people pure,” meaning thereby that the theoretical teaching of the
Book and the “Wisdom” must be followed by a practical training to enable the
people to apply the Book and the Wisdom in the way Allâh requires them to apply.

These verses of the Holy Qur’ân describe the following functions of the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam):

(a) He is the authority in the way the Holy Book [the Qur’ân] has to be recited.

(b) He has the final word in the interpretation of the Book.

(c) He is the only source at which the wisdom based on divine guidance can be
learned.

(d) He is entrusted with the practical training of the people to bring his
teachings into practice.

These functions of the Holy Prophet () can never be carried out unless his
teachings, both oral and practical, are held to be authoritative for his
followers, and the Muslims who are given under his training are made bound to
obey and follow him. The functions (b) and (c), namely, the teaching of the Book
and Wisdom require that his sayings should be binding on the followers, while
the function (d), the practical training, requires that his acts should be an
example for the Ummah, and the Ummah should be bound to follow it.

It is not merely a logical inference from the verses of the Holy Qur’ân quoted
above, but it is also mentioned in express terms by the Holy Qur’ân in a large
number of verses which give the Muslims a mandatory command to obey and follow
him. While doing so, the Holy Qur’ân has used two different terms, namely the
“itaa’ah” (to obey) and “ittibaa’” (to follow). The first term refers to the
orders and sayings of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) while the
second relates to his acts and practice. By ordering the Muslims both to “obey”
and to “follow” the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam), the Holy Qur’ân
has given an authority to both his sayings and acts.

The Obedience (Itaa’ah) of the
Messenger

It is in this background that the Holy Qur’ân insists repeatedly on “the
obedience of the Prophet” so much so that is is mentioned side by side with the
obedience of Allâh:

Say: Obey Allâh and the Messenger, but if they turn their backs, Allâh loves not
the disbelievers. (3:32)

And obey Allâh and the Messenger so that you may be blessed. (3:132)

O those who believe, obey Allâh and obey the Messenger and those in authority
among you. (4:59)

And obey Allâh and obey the Messenger and beware. (5:92)

So fear Allâh and set things right between you, and obey Allâh and His Messenger
if you are believers. (8:1)

O those who believe, obey Allâh and His Messenger and do not turn away from him,
while you are listening. (8:20)

And obey Allâh and His Messenger and do not quarrel with each other, and so lose
heart. (8:46)

Say: Obey Allâh and obey the Messenger; then, if you turn away, upon him rests
what is laid on him, and upon you rests what is laid on you. If you obey him,
you will be guided. (24:54)

O those who believe, obey Allâh and obey the Messenger and do not make your
deeds vain. (47:33)

So establish salaah and pay zakaah and obey Allâh and His Messenger. (58:13)

And obey Allâh and obey the Messenger but if you turn your backs, Our Messenger
has only to deliver the manifest message. (64:12)

In these verses, “the obedience of the Messenger” has been ordered as an
obligatory command. There are other verses in which the results of the
“obedience of the Messenger” have been described. Here again the “obedience of
the Messenger” has been combined with “the obedience of Allâh:”

And whoever obeys Allâh and His Messenger, Allâh shall admit him in the Gardens
underneath which rivers flow. (4:13)

The same words have been repeated in (48:17) also.

And whoever obeys Allâh and the Messenger, they are in the company of those who
Allâh has blessed. (4:69)

All that the believers say, when they are called to Allâh and His Messenger that
he may judge between them, is that they say, “We hear and we obey”: it is these
who are successful. Whoever obeys Allâh and His Messenger and fears Allâh and
has awe of Him: it is these who are the winners. (24:52)

And whoever obeys Allâh and His Messenger, he has won a great success. (33:71)

And the believers, men and women, are friends of each other; they bid the fair
and forbid the unfair; they establish Salâh and pay zakaah and they obey Allâh
and His Messenger. These are those upon whom Allâh shall have mercy; Allâh is
All-Mighty, All-Wise. (9:71)

If you obey Allâh and His Messenger, He will not diminish you anything of your
deeds. (49:14)

The Holy Qur’ân has also made it clear that “the obedience of the prophet” is
not a new principle, nor is it limited to the Holy Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam). The same principle applied to all the former prophets who
came before him:

And we sent no messenger, but that he should be obeyed by the leave of Allâh.
(4:64)

It is also clarified by the Holy Qur’ân that the prophets are the spokesmen of
Allâh’s pleasure. Hence, the obedience of the prophet is actually obedience of
Allâh Himself.

And whoever obeys the Messenger, thereby obeys Allâh. (4:80)

As the obedience of the Holy Prophet () has been stressed by the Holy Qur’ân and
has been combined with the “obedience of Allâh,” in the same way “disobedience”
of him has been warned against and is combined with the “disobedience of Allâh:”

And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger and transgresses His limits, He
shall admit him to Fire where he shall remain forever. (4:14)

And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger has gone astray into manifest
error. (33:36)

And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger, for him there is the fire of
Jahannam. There they shall remain forever. (72:23)

And whoever makes a breach with Allâh and His Messenger, then Allâh is severe in
punishment. (8:13)

Did they not come to know that whoever opposes Allâh and His Messenger, for him
there is the fire of Jahannam? (9:63)

Thus, both positive and negative aspects of the obedience have been dealt with
in the Holy Qur’ân and the “obedience of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam)” in each one of these verses has been mentioned separately, alongwith
the obedience of Allâh.

It is noteworthy that whenever the “obedience of Allâh” is mentioned in the Holy
Qur’ân, it is always followed by the “obedience of the Prophet” which has never
been missed even in a single verse. There is no verse in the entire Book where
the “obedience of Allâh” has been mentioned alone with no reference to the
“obedience of the Messenger.”

On the contrary, there are some verses where only the “obedience of the
Messenger” has been mentioned, and there is no reference to the obedience of
Allâh:

And establish salaah and pay zakaah and obey the Prophet so that you may be
blessed. (24:56)

And if you obey him (the Prophet), you shall find the right path. (24:54)

On that day those who disbelieved and disobeyed the Messenger will wish that the
earth might be levelled with them. (4:42)

And whoever makes a breach with the Messenger after the right path has become
clear to him, and follows a way other than that of the believers, We shall let
him own what he chose and shall admit him in the Jahannam, and it is evil as a
returning place. (4:115)

The reason for so much stress upon the “obedience of the Prophet” is that the
obedience of Allâh cannot be carried out except through the obedience of the
Prophet. Allâh does not address each and every individual to tell him what He
requires from him, as the Holy Qur’ân puts it:

And it is not possible for a human being that Allâh should speak to him, except
by revelation, or from behind a curtain or that He should send a messenger and
reveal by His leave what He wills. (42:51)

Therefore Allâh conveys His injunctions only through His prophets and His
obedience cannot be carried out except by the obedience of the messengers. So,
when a prophet bids something or forbids something, he does not do it in his
private capacity, rather he does so in the capacity of a messenger of Allâh.
When Allâh Himself has given an express command to “obey the Messenger,” the
obedience of the Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is actually the
“obedience of Allâh,” though in an indirect manner. This point has been clearly
established by the Holy Qur’ân in the following words:

And whoever obeys the Messenger, thereby obeys Allâh. (4:80)

So, whenever only the “obedience of the Messenger” has been mentioned in the
Holy Qur’ân, it includes, without saying, the “obedience of Allâh” because the
Messenger does not say anything in the capacity of a Messenger unless he is
guided by a revelation from Allâh:

And he (the Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) does not speak out of his own
desire. It is not but a revelation revealed (to him). (53:3-4)

Looked at from this angle, the obedience of the Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) represents the obedience of Allâh and the reference to the former
always includes the latter. That is why the Holy Qur’ân in some verses deemed it
sufficient to refer to the obedience of the Messenger only, for the practical
way to obey Allâh is only to obey the prophet.

On the contrary, the Holy Qur’ân did not deem it sufficient to refer to the
“obedience of Allâh” without referring to the “obedience of the Messenger,” to
remove even the remotest excuse for ignoring the “obedience of the Prophet” and
to leave no doubt whatsoever in the fact that the obedience of Allâh is not
complete unless the obedience of the Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is
fully observed with all its implications.

Ittibaa’ (Following) of the Prophet

The second
term used by the Holy Qur’ân in respect of the prophets is the ittibaa’, i.e. to
follow:

Say, if you love Allâh, follow me and Allâh will love you and forgive you your
sins. (3:31)

Those who follow the Messenger, the unlettered Prophet, whom they find written
down with them in the Torah and the Injeel… (7:157)

Believe, then, in Allâh and His Messenger, the unlettered Prophet, who believes
in Allâh and His words, and follow him so that you may be on the right path.
(7:158)

Allâh has surely relented towards the Prophet and the Emigrants and the Helpers
who followed him in an hour of difficulty. (9:117)

O Prophet, sufficient for you is Allâh and those who followed you of the
believers. (8:64)

(The believers say:) Our Lord, we have come to believe in what You revealed and
followed the Messenger. So write us among those who bear witness. (3:53)

Say: This is my way. I call to Allâh with sure knowledge, I and whoever follows
me. (12:108)

The closest of the people to Ibrahim are those who follow him. (3:68)

And We set in the hearts of those who followed him (Jesus) tenderness and mercy.
(57:27)

And warn the people of the day when the punishment comes on them and those who
did evil shall say: Our Lord, defer us to a near term and we shall respond to
Your call and shall follow the messengers. (14:44)

And We did not appoint the Qiblah on which you were earlier, but that We might
know the people who follow the Messenger as distinct from those who turn back on
their heels. (2:143)

He said: My people, follow the messenger! (36:20)

(Hârûn said:) And your Lord is the Rahmaan (the All-Merciful), so follow me and
obey my command. (20:90)

So they (the disbelievers) said: Shall we follow a single human being from among
us? Then, indeed we should be in error and insanity. (54:24)

All these verses, with different styles and connotations, lay a strong emphasis
on the necessity of “following the prophets” and indicate that whoever believes
in a prophet is bound to “follow” him. The reason is obvious. The prophets are
sent to the people to set a practical example of what they teach and preach.
Their message is not confined to their oral teachings. Their acts are equally
important in any effort to discover, learn and follow the right way of living.
The Holy Qur’ân is quite explicit on this point when it was said in Surah
al-Ahzaab:

There is surely a good example for you in the Messenger of Allâh, for the one
who hopes (to meet) Allâh and the Hereafter and remembers Allâh abundantly.
(33:21)

It is an established fact that mere theoretical education cannot be sufficient
for reforming a people. The natural way of reformation is to set a practical
example which people may follow. Mere reading of books cannot make a person
perfect in a science or art, unless he is simultaneously trained by a senior
scholar or a skillful artist of that field. If somebody studies the books of
medical science, but does not work under the supervision of an experienced
doctor, he, despite his thorough study, cannot claim to serve as a doctor, nor
can such a person be allowed to play with the lives of the patients.

If somebody studies books of law, he cannot claim to be a lawyer unless he
acquires a practical training from a senior lawyer and remains for a
considerable time under his juniorship.

Even a plain enthusiast who wants to cook a good meal cannot do so perfectly by
merely studying the books written on the subject, although all the ingredients
required for cooking the food are mentioned in the book and even the minute
details of the process are fully described. But a person who has never cooked
that meal before cannot prepare it just right and perfect with the sole help of
a cookbook unless he is practically trained by some expert. That expert sets a
practical example for him and he, by following the example, gradually learns how
to cook that good meal.

It clearly shows that human beings are always in need of a practical example in
order to learn an important subject. The same is true in the matter of religious
teaching and training.

That is why Allâh did not choose to send the divine books only. He always sent a
messenger with the book. There are many prophets who came without a new divine
book. But there is no divine book sent down without a prophet. The disbelievers
of Makkah, too, demanded many times that the Book should be revealed to them
without the mediation of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). But the
demand was rejected and the Book was sent through the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam).

The reason is obvious. Humanity did not need a divine book only. It also needed
a teacher who could teach them the contents of the Book. It also needed an
instructor who could train them and could set a practical example for them
without which they could not benefit from the Book in their practical life. It
was for this reason that the Holy Prophet () was sent with a clear direction to
all human beings that they are bound to obey and follow him and to learn the
details of Allâh’s pleasure through the practical example set before them by
him. It was also clarified in the foregoing verse of the Holy Book that the
“obedience of the Messenger” is actually the “obedience of Allâh” and that the
latter cannot be carried out except through the former, because whatever the
Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) says or does in the capacity of a
prophet is based on the revelation received by him from Allâh. Thus, his sayings
and acts both, even though they are not contained in the Holy Qur’ân, are
inspired or confirmed by the divine revelation.

Two Kinds of Revelation

It follows
from the foregoing discussion that the revelation the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) received from Allâh is of two different kinds:

(i) the revelation of the Qur’ân, the Holy Book, named in the Islamic
terminology as al-wahy al-matluww (the recited revelation, i.e. the revelation
which can be recited in the prayers). This kind of revelation is confined to the
verses of the Holy Qur’ân and is written verbally in its folds.

(ii) the revelation received by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
from time to time to let him know the pleasure of Allâh in day-to-day affairs
and the details of the principles laid down in the Holy Qur’ân with their
correct interpretation. This kind of revelation is called al-wahy ghair
al-matluww (the unrecited revelation). This kind of revelation is not conveyed
to the people verbally. It has been demonstrated through the sayings and acts of
the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam).

The Second Kind of Revelation Proved by the Holy Qur’ân
This second kind of revelation is not contained in the Holy Qur’ân, but the Holy
Qur’ân itself not only refers to it frequently but attributes its contents to
Allâh Almighty. Some verses of the Holy Book are reproduced below which clearly
prove that the “revelation” is not confined to the Holy Qur’ân, but there is
another kind of “wahy” which does not form part of the “Holy Book,” yet it is
the revelation from Allâh Almighty:

First Example: The Holy Qur’ân says:

And We did not appoint the Qiblah on which you were earlier, but that We might
know the people who follow the Messenger as distinct from those who turn back on
their heels. (2:143)

In order to understand the verse, it is necessary to know the background in
which it was revealed:

In the early days of Madani life, after the Holy Prophet’s (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) migration to Madinah, the Muslims were ordered to direct their faces
in prayers towards Baytul-Maqdas (Jerusalem) which had been appointed as Qiblah
of the Muslims. Up to seventeen months, the Muslims had been observing the
Baytul-Maqdas as their Qiblah. It was after seventeen months that the Holy
Qur’ân abrogated the earlier order and the Muslims were required to observe the
Holy Mosque of Makkah as their Qiblah and turn their faces towards it while
praying. The following verse was revealed to appoint the new Qiblah:

…So turn your face towards al-Masjid al-Haraam. (2:144)

This new order was criticized by some disbelievers and they objected on it as to
why the Baytul-Maqdas was appointed as Qiblah earlier. The above quoted verse
(2:143) was revealed to answer this objection. The answer was that the
appointment of the former Qiblah was in order to test the people whether or not
they follow the Messenger. To quote the meaning of the verse again:

And We did not appoint the Qiblah on which you were earlier, but that We might
know the people who follow the Messenger… (2:143)

Here the appointment of the previous Qiblah has been attributed to Allâh
Almighty, which is a clear indication to the fact that the appointment of
Baytul-Maqdas as Qiblah was done by the order of Allâh Almighty Himself. But
this order is nowhere in the Holy Qur’ân, and there is no verse in the Holy Book
which directs the turning of faces towards Baytul-Maqdas. This order was given
to Muslims by the Holy Prophet () with no reference to any verse of the Holy
Qur’ân. Still, this order was mentioned by the Holy Qur’ân in the above quoted
verse as the order of Allâh: The words,

“We did not appoint the Qiblah,” instead of the words,

“The Holy Prophet did not…” are too clear on this point to need more
explanation.

This statement of the Holy Qur’ân, thus, evidently proves that the previous
order given by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) was based on a
revelation which did not form part of the Book. And this is exactly the
“unrecited revelation.” The verse of the Holy Qur’ân (2:143) quoted above proves
the following facts:

(a) The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) used to receive some
revelations which are not contained in the Holy Qur’ân.

(b) These revelations were from Allâh Almighty, so much so that the orders based
on such revelations were attributed to Allâh Almighty.

(c) The orders based on such revelation were as binding on the believers as the
orders of the first kind of revelations, i.e. the verse of the Holy Qur’ân.

(d) These orders were sometimes given so as to test whether or not the Muslims
follow the Messenger (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) irrespective of the question
that his orders are contained in the Holy Qur’ân or not.

Second Example: In the beginning, one of the rules followed by the Muslims in
respect of the fasts of Ramadan was that even a short nap after iftaar (breaking
of a fast) would nullify the permissibility of having sexual intercourse with
one’s wife. So, if someone would sleep for a short while after iftaar and wake
up again, he would lose the opportunity of sleeping with his wife during the
rest of the night, despite that the fast was over. This rule was prescribed by
the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) and was not contained in the Holy
Qur’ân. But some Muslims broke the rule by sleeping with their wives after
having a post-iftaar nap. Referring to these events, the Holy Qur’ân first
admonishes those people who did not follow the rule. Then, by abrogating the
same, allows the Muslims in future to sleep with their wives even when they had
a nap after iftaar. In this context the Holy Qur’ân says:

It is made lawful for you, in the nights of fasts, to have sex with your women.
They are a cover for you, and you are a cover for them. Allâh knew that you were
betraying yourselves; so, He relented towards you and pardoned you. So, now you
can have sexual intimacy with them, and seek what Allâh has destined for you,
and eat and drink until the white thread of the dawn becomes distinct from the
black thread; then complete the fasts up to the night. (2:187)

The following points with respect to this verse are worth consideration:

(a) The verse confirms that having sex during the nights of Ramadaan was not
lawful before.

(b) The people who had sex during the nights of Ramadaan before this verse was
revealed are admonished by describing their act as “betraying themselves.”

(c) The words, “so He relented towards you and pardoned you,” indicate that
their sexual act was a sin, because “relenting” and “pardoning” occur only after
a person commits a sin.

(d) The words “so now you can have sexual intimacy with them” denote that it is
only now that the sexual act during the nights of Ramadaan has been made lawful.

All these points confirm the fact that the earlier prohibition of having sexual
intercourse during the nights of Ramadaan was validly made by a competent
authority, and the Muslims were bound to abide by it.

But there is no verse in the Holy Qur’ân to convey this prohibition.. It was
enforced only by the Holy Prophet (). Still, the Holy Qur’ân not only confirms
it, but also treats it as if it were in its own words. It is due to the fact
that the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) did not enforce this
prohibition by his own will, it was rather based on a revelation of Allâh
Almighty which is not contained in the Holy Qur’ân.

Looked at from this angle, this verse on the one hand proves that there is a
revelation which does not form part of the Holy Qur’ân, and on the other hand it
reaffirms the status of the Holy Prophet () as a law-giver, and that his
injunctions, both orders and prohibitions, are binding on the Muslims.

Third Example: On the occasion of the battle of Uhud, some Qur’ânic verses were
revealed to make the Muslims recall the events of the battle of Badr: How Allâh
helped them and how He promised to send the angels to their aid, and how He
actually did so. These verses are as under:

Allâh has certainly helped you at Badr while you were weak. So, fear Allâh so
that you may be grateful. When you (O Prophet) were saying to the believers,
‘Shall it not suffice you that your Lord shall aid you with three thousand
angels being sent down? Why not? If you observe patience and fear Allâh and they
come to you in this their heat, your Lord shall aid you with five thousand
angels having distinct marks?’ And Allâh did not make it but a good news for you
so that your hearts might be satisfied. And there is no help except from Allâh,
the All-Mighty, the All-Wise. (3:123-126)

The emphasized sentence of these verses attributes the good news of the aid of
angels to Allâh Almighty, meaning thereby that the good news of this aid was
given by Allâh Himself. But this good news given at the time of Badr is nowhere
available in the Holy Qur’ân. In other words, there is no verse in the Holy Book
revealed during the battle of Badr which implies the good news of the aid of the
angels. What is quoted above is only a reference of that news, made at the time
of a later battle, and it is expressly mentioned in this verse that the good
news was given by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). Still, the
news is attributed to Allâh.

Thus, it is another example where the words of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) are held to be the words of Allâh. There is no reason for this
expression other than that the words of the Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) were inspired by a special revelation, not contained in the Holy
Qur’ân, and this is what is called the “unrecited revelation.”

Fourth example: Referring to the battle of Uhud at another occasion, the Holy
Qur’ân says:

And when Allâh
promised you that one of the two groups shall be for you. (8:7)

One of the two parties referred to in this verse was the commercial caravan of
Abu Sufyan, coming from Syria, and the other group was the army of the Makkan
disbelievers, led by Abu Jahl. The above verse says that Allâh had promised the
believers that they would triumph over one of these two groups. The Muslims, in
fact, won the battle against the latter, namely, the army of Abu Jahl.

The point worth consideration here is that the promise of Allâh to give the
Muslims victory against any of the two groups is not there in the Holy Qur’ân.
This promise was conveyed to the Muslims by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) without any reference to any verse of the Holy Qur’ân. Still, the
verse quoted above atttibutes the promise to Allâh and not to the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam).

The only conclusion derivable from this is that the promise was received by the
Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) through an “unrecited revelation.”
Hence it is attributed to Allâh. Guided by this revelation, the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) conveyed the promise to his companions.

Thus, it is another proof of the existence of a kind of revelation which is not
contained in the Holy Qur’ân and is called the “unrecited revelation.”

Fifth Example: Once the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) told a secret
to one of his wives. She disclosed the secret to some other person. When the
Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) came to know that the secret has been
disclosed by his wife, he sought an explanation from her. She asked him as to
who told him about the disclosure. The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) replied that he was informed about it by Allâh Almighty.

This event has been mentioned by the Holy Qur’ân in the following words:

And when the Prophet told one of his wives about a matter secretly; then, when
she told about it, and Allâh has disclosed it to him, he made known some part of
it, and turned aside from some part; then, when he told her about it, she said,
“Who told you this?” He said, “I was told by the All-Knowing, the All-Aware.”
(66: 3)

The emphasized sentence of this verse is quite clear in that Allâh told the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) about the disclosure of the secret. This
is also not mentioned anywhere in the Holy Qur’ân. So, it is another concrete
example where the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) received some
revelation from Allâh other than the one contained in the Holy Qur’ân. This is
exactly the “unrecited revelation.”

Sixth Example: During the siege of Banu Nadir, the famous tribe of the Jews in
Madinah, some Muslims had cut down date-trees from around the fort to compel the
enemy to surrender. After the war was over, some Jews objected to the cutting
trees. The Holy Qur’ân has answered the objection in the following words:

Whatever date-trees you cut down, or left standing upon their roots, that was by
the leave of Allâh. (59:5)

It has been very directly mentioned in this verse that the Muslims cut down the
trees with a leave from Allâh. But nobody can point out to any verse in the Holy
Qur’ân to the effect that the cutting of trees during the war is allowed. The
question is: from where did the Muslims acquire this leave from Allâh? There is
no answer to this question except that the leave of Allâh had been conveyed to
them by the Holy Prophet () and he received it through “unrecited revelation.”

Seventh Example: It is well known that the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) had adopted Sayyidina Zaid bin Haarithah (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) as his son. He married Zainab, daughter of Jahsh. After some time
their relations began to be strained and, ultimately, he divorced her. In the
days of Jahiliyyah an adopted son was treated as a real son in all respects and
for all purposes. The Holy Qur’ân, on the other hand, declared that the adopted
sons cannot be treated as the real ones.

To eradicate the Jahili concept of the adopted son, Allâh Almighty ordered the
Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) that he should marry Zainab
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) after her having been divorced by his adopted son,
Zaid ibn Haarithah (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) was a bit reluctant in the beginning, for, according to the
prevalent custom, it was treated a shameful act to marry the divorced wife of
one’s adopted son. But when the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
received a concrete order from Allâh, he married her.

This event has been mentioned by the Holy Qur’ân in the following words:

When you were saying to the one whom Allâh had blessed and whom you had blessed,
(i.e. Zaid, before he divorced Zainab), “Keep to you your wife and fear Allâh,”
and you were hiding in your heart what Allâh was to disclose and you were
fearing people, and Allâh has more right to be feared by you. So, when Zaid
finished with her, We made you marry her, so that there may remain no
restriction on the believers in respect of the wives of their adopted sons when
they have finished with them. And the order of Allâh had to be done. (33:37)

Here the words, “you were hiding in your heart what Allâh was to disclose,”
refer to the fact that Allâh had informed the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) that he will marry Zainab (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) after she is
divorced by Zaid (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) knew that, ultimately, she is going to be divorced by Zaid,
but, out of shame, he could not disclose it and when Zaid consulted him in the
matter, he advised him to keep to his wife and not to divorce her.

From this it follows that the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) had
been foretold by Allâh that Zainab was going to be divorced by her husband. But
this information is not contained in the Holy Qur’ân. It was given to him
through an unrecited revelation.

The second sentence is more significant in the context, that is, “We made you
marry her.” Here Allâh Almighty declares that the marriage between the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) and Sayyidah Zainab (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) was contracted by an order of Allâh.This order is nowhere mentioned
in the Holy Qur’ân. Still, the Holy Qur’ân affirms it. This is another
confirmation of an order conveyed to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) through an “unrecited revelation.”

Eighth Example: The Holy Qur’ân has repeatedly ordered the Muslims to establish
salaah (the prayer) and to be steadfast in it. In the following verse, after
repeating the same order, the Holy Qur’ân gives a special concession to the
Muslims that, in the state of war, when they fear an attack from their enemy,
they can perform the prayer in whatever way they can, either riding on horses or
camels or walking on their feet. But after the danger of the enemy is over, they
are ordered to perform the prayer in its normal way. This principle has been
laid down in the following words:

Take due care of all the prayers and the middle prayer; and stand before Allâh
in total devotion. But if you are in fear, then (pray) on foot or riding, but
when you are in peace, then recite the name of Allâh in the way He taught you.
(2:238-239)

A number of points are worth consideration in these verses:

Firstly, the verse assumes that there are more than one prayers obligatory on
the Muslims, but the exact number of the prayers has not been given, neither in
this verse nor at any other place in the Holy Qur’ân. That the number of
obligatory prayers is five is only mentioned by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam). The Holy Qur’ân, by saying “Take due care of all the
prayers,” confirms what the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
prescribed for the Muslims.

Secondly, the verse lays special emphasis on the “Middle Prayer,” but does not
define it. The definition has been left to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam).

Thirdly, the most important sentence in relation to our subject is, “when you
are in peace, then recite the name of Allâh in the way He taught you.” It goes
without saying that the “recitation of the name of Allâh” means here “to perform
the prayer” as the context does not permit any other meaning.

Now, the Holy Qur’ân directs the Muslims that in the state of peace they should
perform the prayer in its normal way which has been taught to them by Allâh. It
is an express indication that the normal way of performing prayers has been
taught to the Muslims by Allâh Himself. But no such way has ever been mentioned
in the Holy Qur’ân. There is no verse in the Holy Book mentioning the detailed
way of performing prayer. It is only the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) who educated the Muslims as to how they are to perform it. But the
Holy Qur’ân holds the teaching of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
to be the teaching of Allâh.

It means that Allâh has taught the way of prayer to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) through some “unrecited revelation” not contained in the Holy
Qur’ân, and the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) taught it to the
Muslims. Thus, the Muslims have been taught by Allâh through the teaching of the
Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). However, the teaching of the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is described in the holy verse as the
teaching of Allâh, because it was based on the “unrecited revelation.”

Ninth Example: Certain hypocrites had not accompanied the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) in the expedition of Hudaibiyah. After that, when
the Muslims resolved to proceed to the battle of Khayber, the Holy Prophet ()
declared that only the participants of Hudaibiyah shall be entitled to accompany
him on this journey. The hypocrites who did not go to Hudaibiyah were now
interested in their participation in the battle of Khaybar because according to
their anticipation the Muslims were expected to gain from there sizeable spoils,
which the hypocrites wanted to share. But the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam), inspite of their requests, did not allow them to participate in the
battle.

This event has been referred to in the following verse of the Holy Qur’ân:

Those remaining behind will say, when you set forth after spoils to acquire
them, “Let us follow you,”- desiring to change the words of Allâh. Say, “You
shall not follow us; so Allâh has said earlier.” (48:15)

The emphasized words indicate that there was a previous word of Allâh barring
the participation of the hypocrites in the battle of Khaybar, and confining the
battle to the participants of Hudaibiyah. But no such word exists anywhere in
the Holy Qur’ân. It was only a prophetic order. Still, Allâh Almighty describes
it as His Own word. The reason is obvious. The Prophetic order was based on the
order of Allâh received by him through some “unrecited revelation” which is not
found in the Holy Qur’ân. Yet, it was a revelation, as certain as any word of
Allâh.

Tenth Example: In the early days of his Prophethood, when the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) received the verses of the Holy Qur’ân revealed to
him, he used to recite the same simultaneously, lest he should forget them. It
was a strenuous exercise for him, because he felt it was much too difficult to
listen to the revelation, to understand it correctly, and to learn it by heart,
all at the same time. Allâh Almighty relieved him from this burden when He
revealed the following verses of the Holy Qur’ân:

Move not your tongue with it in order to hasten it. It is on Us to gather it (in
your heart) and to recite it. So, when We read it, follow its reading. Then it
is on Us to explain it. (75:16-19)

In the last sentence, Allâh Almighty has promised the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) to explain the verses of the Holy Qur’ân to him. It is evident
that this explanation is something separate from the Holy Qur’ân itself. It is
not the Holy Qur’ân. It is its explanation or its exegesis. Therefore, it should
necessarily be in some other form, distinct from the words of the Holy Book. And
this is exactly what is meant by the “unrecited revelation.” But the two kinds
of revelation, though different in their form, are both revealed to the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam); both are from Allâh; and both are to be
believed and obeyed by the Muslims.

And Allâh has revealed upon you the Book and the wisdom, and has taught you what
you did not know and the grace of Allâh upon you has been great. (4:113)

In this verse the revelation of the Wisdom has been mentioned as separate from
the revelation of the Book. It indicates that the wisdom referred to here is
something additional to the Holy Qur’ân, and it has also been revealed to the
Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) by Allâh Almighty.

Then the Holy Qur’ân proceeds to say: “And (Allâh) has taught you what you did
not know.” It means that Allâh has not only revealed the Book, but has also
revealed the Wisdom, and also taught the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) what he did not know before. This teaching includes all kinds of
directions given by Him to His prophet, either through the Holy Book or through
some “unrecited revelation” in the light of which the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) performed his functions as a messenger of Allâh.

Twelfth Example: The Holy Qur’ân has summarised the various kinds of revelation
in the following words:

And it is not possible for a human being that Allâh should speak to him, except
by way of revelation or from behind a curtain, or that He should send a
messenger and he reveals by His leave what He wills. (42:51)

Now, out of these three modes, the revelation of the Holy Qur’ân was carried out
through the third one, namely, through an angel who is identified in the verse
by the word, “messenger.” It is clearly settled by some other verses:

Say: Whoever be an enemy to Jibreel (Gabriel, the angel)—it is he who has
brought it (the Qur’ân) down upon your heart by the permission of Allâh. (2:97)

And truly it (the Qur’ân) is the revelation of the Lord of the worlds, brought
down by the Faithful Spirit upon your heart, that you may be one of the warners,
in a clear Arabic tongue. (26:192-195)

These verses are quite explicit on the point that the Holy Qur’ân has been
revealed through an angel, named in the first verse as Jibreel, and in the
second one as the Faithful Spirit; but the verse (42:51) quoted above describes
that there are two more ways of revelation. These two modes have also been used
in the case of the Holy Prophet (). It means that the revelation sent down to
the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) was not confined to the Holy
Qur’ân, but there were other revelations, too. These revelations are termed as
“unrecited revelation.”

These are sixteen verses, which affirm not only the existence of the “unrecited
revelation” but also its reliability and authenticity, and its binding nature.
It is not intended here to produce all the material available in the Holy Qur’ân
to establish this kind of revelation. The purpose was to give some examples
only, which has, perhaps, been substantially served. But before proceeding
further, it will be useful to recollect and summarize the conclusions that stand
proved in the light of the Holy Qur’ân as discussed above:

(1) The function of the Holy Prophet () like other prophets is not only to
convey the divine Book. He is also to teach the Book, to teach the wisdom and to
make people pure by training them practically.

(2) The “Obedience of the Holy Prophet” () is as necessary as the obedience of
Allâh; because the latter has always been mentioned in the Holy Qur’ân combined
with the former.

(3) The obedience of the Holy Prophet () in practical is the obedience of Allâh;
and the latter cannot be carried out except through the former.

(4) The Muslims are bound not only to obey the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam), but they are also under an obligation to follow him.

(5) Whatever the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) says or does in his
capacity of a Messenger is always based on, or confirmed by, a revelation from
Allâh.

(6) This revelation is sometimes contained in the Holy Qur’ân and called the
recited revelation, and sometimes it is sent down in addition to the Holy
Qur’ân, and the same is termed as “unrecited revelation.”

The Obedience of the Prophet as
Distinct from the Obedience of a Ruler

From the above conclusions, which are based purely on the verses of the Holy
Qur’ân, another possibility, often overemphasized by some quarters while
opposing the authority of the sunnah, is completely ruled out. It is sometimes
said that the Holy Qur’ân, when it ordains the obedience of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam), means his obedience in the capacity of a ruler or
a head of the state, and not in the capacity of a prophet. Since the Holy
Prophet () was also a ruler of the Muslims, they were ordered to “obey” and
“follow” him. But after he passed away, his personal obedience is no more
necessary. Now, whoever takes over the rule shall stand for the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) in the matter of obedience, and the Muslims should
follow him.

This fallacy is based on the misconception that the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) was ordered to be obeyed in his capacity of a ruler, and not
in the capacity of a prophet or messenger.

But the verses already quoted leave no room for this misconception. The reasons
are as under:

(1) Wherever the Holy Qur’ân has directed toward the “obedience of the Holy
Prophet” (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) it has always referred to the “obedience
of the Messenger” and not to the obedience of the “ruler”, nor to the obedience
of “Muhammad” (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) in his private capacity. It clearly
indicates that he must be obeyed on account of his being a messenger.

When I say, to someone, “obey your father,” it means that his being father is
the basic cause of his being obeyed. If I say, “obey your teacher,” it is
evident that his being teacher is the cause of his obedience being due. Nobody
can reasonably interpret these sentences conversely. So, when Allâh Almighty
says, “Obey the Messenger,” how can it be reasonable to say that his
messengership is not the cause of his obedience?

(2) At one occasion, at least, the Holy Qur’ân has removed even the remotest
possibility of this wrong interpretation, when it said:

O those who believe, obey Allâh and obey the Messenger and those in authority
among you.(4:59)

Here, the obedience of the messenger has been separated and distinguished from
that of the ruling authorities, which means that the “messenger” and “those in
authority” both are to be obeyed in their different capacities.

It is important to note that in the case of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) both the capacities were combined in him. He was a Messenger as well
as a ruler. Therefore, if the Holy Qur’ân intended to restrict the obedience of
the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) to his lifetime only, it could
easily be said, “Obey Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam).” But by avoiding
this expression, the Holy Qur’ân explicitly differentiated between his two
capacities, and mentioned each of them separately to remove even the slightest
apprehension of this misconception, and thus left no room for confusing one
capacity with the other.

Moreover, there is another point to note in this verse. The word “Messenger”
used here is in singular, while the phrase “those in authority,” is in plural.
This is to signify that the Holy Prophet () is the last messenger after whom no
prophet will come. So, his obedience as a prophet shall always be confined to
himself alone. Nobody can share with him in this obedience in future. On the
other hand, the ruling authorities shall be in a large number, coming one after
the other. This kind of obedience is not restricted to the ruler present at the
time of revelation; it, rather, extends to all the ruling authorities coming
after him.

(3) It has been established earlier that the obedience of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) was based on the “unrecited revelation” he used to
receive from Allâh. That is why the Holy Qur’ân has held it to be the “obedience
of Allâh” Himself. On the other hand, no ruler or head of state can claim to
receive any revelation of any kind.

It is for this reason that a ruler can enjoy an administrative authority over
his subjects, but he cannot lay down the rules of Sharî’ah. His orders are
purely administrative orders, which are to be obeyed by the citizens in that
capacity alone. He cannot override any rule of Sharî’ah enshrined in the Holy
Qur’ân and the sunnah, nor can his orders be regarded as imperatives for all
times to come, as those of Sharî’ah, because they are not based on any
revelation from Allâh. They are effective only in a sphere where the Sharî’ah
has not given any definite rule, and left the matter on the discretion of a
ruler.

The case of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is totally different.
He, as a messenger, receives revelation from Allâh, recited and unrecited both.
His prophetic orders, therefore, are not just administrative orders based on his
personal perception. They are based on the revelation, or, at least, are
confirmed by it. Let me now explain both situations:

The orders of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) are sometimes based
on the revelation in the sense that the revelation “recited or unrecited” is
their original source. But for this revelation, he would not deliver such
orders. There can be no doubt in their divine nature. Hence they form part of
the Sharî’ah.

In some cases, however, the origin of the orders is not a revelation. They are
based originally on the Holy Prophet’s (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) own
analysis of the affairs. But they are confirmed by a revelation later on. This
confirmation again is of two kinds: sometimes it occurs in explicit terms,
whereby the decision of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is upheld
by a revelation, and sometimes it happens to be an implied confirmation. If
Allâh Almighty does not object to a certain act of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam), it necessarily implies that the act has been confirmed by
Him.

The reason is obvious. A prophet of Allâh, being a spokesman of His pleasure,
remains under a constant divine supervision. If he says something or does
something, which is not in complete consonance with Allâh’s pleasure, he is
always warned about it. In a number of verses, the Holy Qur’ân has expressed
Allâh’s disapproval of some acts done or intended by the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). Thus, no act of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) has ever gone unchecked.

In this perspective, if the Holy Prophet () does some thing or issues an order,
and no revelation, recited or unrecited, comes to disapprove of the same, it
necessarily implies that the act or order has been approved by Allâh Almighty,
because if the converse were true, the revelation would never remain silent; it
would certainly come to correct the error, as it came in certain cases where
disapproval was conveyed in direct terms to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam).

Thus, whatever he says or does in his capacity of a messenger, and no revelation
comes to the contrary, it is deemed to be an implied confirmation of his saying
or act.

It is, therefore, true to say that all his orders and acts are either based on
the revelation, or confirmed by it, explicitly or implicitly.

No such authority can be attributed to any ruler after him, because the
revelation after him came to an end. This is why the Holy Qur’ân highlights the
obedience of the messenger as distinct from that of the ruling authorities.

On these three major grounds, there is no room for the misconception that the
“obedience of the Messenger” emphasized by the Holy Qur’ân means the “obedience
of the ruling authority.” In fact, his obedience is necessary for the sole
reaason that he is a prophet, and his orders and acts reflect the pleasure of
Allâh. Hence the Sunnah which is nothing but a record of his sayings and acts,
enjoys a binding authority on all Muslims who believe in Allâh and His Holy
Book.

Chapter 2

The Scope of the Prophetic Authority

The verses of the Qur’ân quoted in the previous chapter, and the natural
conclusions derived therefrom, are sufficient to prove the authority of the
“Sunnah” of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). Its being a source
of Islâmic law stands proved on that score. Yet the Holy Qur’ân has not only
stressed upon the “obedience of the Messenger” as a general rule or principle.
It has also highlighted the different shades of authority in order to explain
the scope of his obedience, and the various spheres where it is to be applied.

Therefore, we propose in this chapter to deal with each of these spheres
separately, and to explain what the Holy Qur’ân requires of us in respect of
each of them.

The Prophet’s (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) Authority to Make Laws

A number of verses in the Holy Qur’ân
establish the authority of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) as a
legislator or a law-maker. Some of those are reproduced below:

And My mercy embraces all things. So I shall prescribe it for those who fear
Allâh and pay zakâh (obligatory alms) and those who have faith in Our signs;
those who follow the Messenger, the unlettered Prophet whom they find written
down in the Torah and the Injîl, and who bids them to the Fair and forbids them
the Unfair, and makes lawful for them the good things, and makes unlawful for
them the impure things, and relieves them of their burdens and of the shackles
that were upon them. So, those who believe in him, and honour him, and help him,
and follow the light that has been sent down with him- they are the ones who
acquire success. (7:156-157)

The emphasized words in this verse signify that one of the functions of the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is “to make lawful the good things and
make unlawful the impure things.” This function has been separated from “bidding
the Fair and forbidding the Unfair,” because the latter relates to the preaching
of what has already been established as Fair, and warning against what is
established as Unfair, while the former embodies the making of lawful and
unlawful, that is, the enforcing of new laws regarding the permissibility or
prohibition of things. This function of prescribing new religious laws and rules
is attributed here not to the Holy Qur’ân, but to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam). It, therefore, cannot be argued that the “making lawful or
unlawful” means the declaration of what is laid down in the Holy Qur’ân only,
because the declaration of a law is totally different from making it.

Besides, the declaration of the established rules has been referred to in the
earlier sentence separately, that is, “bids them to the Fair and forbids for
them the Unfair.” The reference in the next sentence, therefore, is only to
“making” new laws.

The verse also emphasizes “to believe” in the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam). In the present context, it clearly means to believe in all his
functions mentioned in the verse including to make something “lawful” or
“unlawful.”

The verse, moreover, directs to follow the light that has been sent down with
him. Here again, instead of “following the Holy Qur’ân,” “following the light”
has been ordered, so as to include all the imperatives sent down to the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam), either through the Holy Book or through
the unrecited revelation, reflecting in his own orders and acts.

Looked at from whatever angle, this verse is a clear proof of the fact that the
Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) had an authority based, of course, on
the unrecited revelation, to make new laws in addition to those mentioned in the
Holy Qur’ân.

The Holy Qur’ân says:

Fight those who do not believe in Allâh and the Hereafter and do not hold
unlawful what Allâh and His Messenger have made unlawful. (9:29)

The underlined words signify that it is necessary to “hold unlawful what Allâh
and His Messenger made unlawful,” and that the authority making something
unlawful is not restricted to Allâh Almighty. The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) can also, by the will of Allâh, exercise this authority. The
difference between the authority of Allâh and that of the Messenger is, no
doubt, significant. The former is wholly independent, intrinsic and
self-existent, while the authority of the latter is derived from and dependent
on the revelation from Allâh. Yet, the fact remains that the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) has this authority and it is necessary for
believers to submit to it alongwith their submission to the authority of Allâh.

The Holy Qur’ân says:

No believer, neither man nor woman, has a right, when Allâh and His Messenger
decide a matter, to have a choice in their matter in issue. And whoever disobeys
Allâh and His Messenger has gone astray into manifest error. (33:36)

Here, the decisions of Allâh and the Messenger (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
both have been declared binding on the believers.

It is worth mentioning that the word “and” occuring between “Allâh” and “His
Messenger” carries both conjunctive and disjunctive meanings. It cannot be held
to give conjunctive sense only, because in that case it will exclude the
decision of Allâh unless it is combined with the decision of the messenger- a
construction too fallacious to be imagined in the divine expression.

The only reasonable construction, therefore, is to take the word “and” in both
conjunctive and disjunctive meanings. The sense is that whenever Allâh or His
Messenger (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam), any one or both of them, decide a
matter, the believers have no choice except to submit to their decisions.

It is thus clear that the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) has the
legal authority to deliver decisions in the collective and individual affairs of
the believers who are bound to surrender to those decisions.

The Holy Qur’ân says:

Whatever the Messenger gives you, take it; and whatever he forbids you, refrain
from it. (59:7)

Although the context of this verse relates to the distribution of the spoils of
war, yet it is the well-known principle of the interpretation of the Holy Qur’ân
that, notwithstanding the particular event in which a verse is revealed, if the
words used are general, they are to be construed in their general sense; they
cannot be restricted to that particular event.

Keeping in view this principle, which is never disputed, the verse gives a
general rule about the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) that whatever
order he gives is binding on the believers and whatever thing he forbids stands
prohibited for them. The Holy Qur’ân thus has conferred a legal authority to the
Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) to give orders, to make laws and to
enforce prohibitions.

It will be interesting here to cite a wise answer of ‘Abdullâh ibn Mas’ûd
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam), the blessed companion of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam), which he gave to a woman.

A woman from the tribe of Asad came to ‘Abdullah ibn Mas’ûd (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) and said, “I have come to know that you hold such and such things as
prohibited. I have gone through the whole Book of Allâh, but never found any
such prohibition in it.”

‘Abdullah ibn Mas’ûd (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) replied, “Had you read the
Book you would have found it. Allâh Almighty says: “Whatever the Messenger gives
you, take it; and whatever he forbids you, refrain from it.” (59:7). (Ibn Mâjah)

By this answer ‘Abdullah ibn Mas’ûd pointed out that this verse is so
comprehensive that it embodies all the orders and prohibitions of the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) and since the questioned prohibitions are
enforced by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) they form part of
this verse, though indirectly.

The Holy Qur’ân says:

But no, by your Lord, they shall not be (deemed to be) believers unless they
accept you as judge in their disputes, then find in their hearts no adverse
feeling against what you decided, but surrender to it in complete submission.
(4:65)

The authority of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) established in
this verse seems apparently to be an authority to adjudicate in the disputes
brought before him. But after due consideration in the construction used here,
this authority appears to be more than that of a judge. A judge, no doubt, has
an authority to deliver his judgments, but the submission to his judgments is
not a condition for being a Muslim. If somebody does not accept the judgment of
a duly authorized judge, it can be a gross misconduct on his part, and a great
sin, for which he may be punished, but he cannot be excluded from the pale of
Islâm on this score alone. He cannot be held as disbeliever.

On the contrary, the verse vehemently insists that the person who does not
accept the verdicts of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) cannot be
held to be a believer. This forceful assertion indicates that the authority of
the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is not merely that of a customary
judge. The denial of his judgments amounts to disbelief. It implies that the
verdicts of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) referred to here are
not the normal verdicts given in the process of a trial. They are the laws laid
down by him on the basis of the revelation, recited or unrecited, that he
receives from Allâh. So, the denial of these laws is, in fact, the denial of the
divine orders which excludes the denier from the pale of Islâm.

Looked at from this point of view, this verse gives the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) not only the authority of a judge, but also confers upon him
the authority to make laws, as binding on the Muslims as the divine laws.

The Holy Qur’ân says:

They say, “we
believe in Allâh and the Messenger, and we obey.” Then, after that, a group of
them turn away. And they are not believers. And when they are called to Allâh
and His Messenger that he may judge between them, suddenly a group of them turn
back. But if they had a right, they come to him submissively! Is it that there
is sickness in their hearts? Or are they in doubt? Or do they fear that Allâh
may be unjust towards them, and His Messenger? Nay, but they are the unjust. All
that the believers say when they are called to Allâh and His Messenger that he
(the Messenger) may judge between them, is that they say, “We hear and we obey.”
And they are those who acquire success. And whoever obeys Allâh and His
Messenger and fears Allâh and observes His Awe, such are those who are the
winners. (24:47-52)

These verses, too, hold that, in order to be a Muslim, the condition is to
surrender to the verdicts of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam).
Those who do not turn towards him in their disputes inspite of being called to
him cannot, according to the Holy Qur’ân, be treated as believers. It carries
the same principle as mentioned in the preceding verse: It is the basic
ingredient of the belief in Allâh and His Messenger that the authority of the
Messenger should be accepted whole-heartedly. He must be consulted in disputes
and obeyed. His verdicts must be followed in total submission, and the laws
enunciated by him must be held as binding.

The second
type of authority given to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is the
authority to interpret and explain the Holy Book. He is the final authority in
the interpretation of the Holy Qur’ân. The Holy Qur’ân says:

And We sent down towards you the Advice (i.e. the Qur’ân) so that you may
explain to the people what has been sent down to them, and so that they may
ponder. (16:44)

It is unequivocally established here that the basic function of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is to explain the Holy Book and to interpret the
revelation sent down to him. It is obvious that the Arabs of Makkah, who were
directly addressed by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) did not
need any translation of the Qur’ânic text. The Holy Qur’ân was revealed in their
own mother tongue. Despite that they were mostly illiterate, they had a command
on their language and literature. Their beautiful poetry, their eloquent
speeches and their impressive dialogues are the basic sources of richness in the
Arabic literature. They needed no one to teach them the literal meaning of the
Qur’ânic text. That they understood the textual meaning is beyond any doubt.

It is thus obvious that the explanation entrusted to the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) was something more than the literal meaning of the
Book. It was an explanation of what Allâh Almighty intended, including all the
implications involved and the details needed. These details are also received by
the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) through the unrecited revelation.
As discussed earlier, the Holy Qur’ân has clearly said,

Then, it is on Us to explain it. (75:19)

This verse is self-explanatory on the subject. Allâh Almighty has Himself
assured the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) that He shall explain the
Book to him. So, whatever explanation the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) gives to the Book is based on the explanation of Allâh Himself. So,
his interpretation of the Holy Qur’ân overrides all the possible
interpretations. Hence, he is the final authority in the exegesis and
interpretation of the Holy Qur’ân. His word is the last word in this behalf.

Examples of Prophetic Explanations of
the Qur’ân

To be more specific, I would give a few concrete instances of the explanations
of the Holy Book given to us by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam).
These examples will also show the drastic amount of what we lose if we ignore
the sunnah of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam):

1. The salaah (prayer) is the well-known way of worship which is undisputedly
held as the first pillar of Islâm after having faith. The Holy Qur’ân has
ordered more than 73 times to observe it. Despite this large number of verses
giving direct command to observe the salaah, there is no verse in the entire
Book to explain how to perform and observe it.

Some components of the salaah, like ruku’ (bowing down) or sujud (prostration)
or qiyaam (standing) are, no doubt, mentioned in the Holy Qur’ân. But the
complete way to perform salaah as a composite whole has never been explained. It
is only through the sunnah of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
that we learn the exact way to perform it. If the sunnah is ignored, all these
details about the correct way of observing salaah are totally lost. Not only
this, nobody can bring forth an alternate way to perform salaah on the basis of
the Holy Qur’ân alone.

It is significant that the Holy Qur’ân has repeated the comand of observing
salaah as many as 73 times, yet, it has elected not to describe the way it had
to be performed. This is not without some wisdom behind it. The point that seems
to have been made deliberately is one of the significance of the sunnah.

By avoiding the details about no less a pillar of Islâm than salaah, it is
pointed out that the Holy Qur’ân is meant for giving the fundamental principles
only. The details are left to the explanations of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam).

2. Moreover, it is mentioned in the Holy Qur’ân that the salaah is tied up with
some prescribed times. Allâh Almighty says:

Surely, the salaah is a timed obligation for the believers. (4:104)

It is clear from this verse that there are some particular times in which the
salaah should be performed. But what are those times is nowhere mentioned in the
Holy Qur’ân. Even that the daily obligatory prayers are five in number is never
disclosed in the Holy Book. It is only through the sunnah of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) that we have learnt the exact number and specific
times of the obligatory prayers.

3. The same is the position of the number of rak’aat to be performed in each
prayer. It is not mentioned anywhere in the Holy Qur’ân that the number of
rak’aat is two in Fajr, four in Zuhr, ‘Asr and ‘Isha; it is only in the sunnah
that these matters are mentioned.

If the sunnah is not believed, all these necessary details even about the first
pillar of Islâm remain totally unknown, so as to render the salaah too vague an
obligation to be carried out in practice.

4. The same is the case if zakaah (alms-giving), the second pillar of Islâm,
which is in most cases combined with the salaah in the Holy Qur’ân. The order to
“pay zakaah” is found in the Holy Book in more than thirty places. But who is
liable to pay it? On what rate it should be paid? What assets are liable to the
obligation of zakaah? What assets are exempted from it? All these questions
remain unanswered if the sunnah of the Holy Qur’ân (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
is ignored. It is the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) who explained
all these details about zakaah.

5. Fasts of Ramadan are held to be the third pillar of Islâm. Here again only
the fundamental principles are found in the Holy Qur’ân. Most of the necessary
details have been left to the explanation of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) which he disclosed through his sayings and acts. What acts, other
than eating, drinking and having sex, are prohibited or permitted during the
fast? Under what conditions can one break the fast during the day? What kind of
treatment can be undertaken in the state of fasting? All these and similar other
details are mentioned by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam).

6. The Holy Qur’ân has said after mentioning how to perform wudu’, (ablution):

And if you are junub (defiled) well-purify yourself. (5:6)

It is also clarified in the Holy Qur’ân that while being junub (defiled) one
should not perform prayers (4:43). But the definition of junub (defiled) is
nowhere given in the Holy Qur’ân nor is it mentioned how should a defiled person
“well-purify” himself. It is the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) who
has explained all these questions and laid down the detailed injunctions on the
subject.

7. The command of the Holy Qur’ân concerning Hajj, the fourth pillar of Islâm,
is in the following words:

And as a right of Allâh, it is obligatory on people to perform the Hajj of the
House- whoever has the ability to manage his way to it. (3:97)

It is just not disclosed here as to how many times the Hajj (pilgrimage to
Makkah) is obligatory? The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) explained
that the obligation is discharged by performing Hajj only once in a life-time.

8. The Holy Qur’ân says:

Those who accumulate gold and silver and do not spend them in the way of Allâh,
give them the news of a painful punishment. (9:34)

Here, “accumulation” is prohibited and “spending” is enjoined. But the quantum
of none of the two is explained. Upto what limit can one save his money, and how
much spending is obligatory? Both the questions are left to the explanation of
the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) who has laid down the detailed
rules in this respect.

9. The Holy Qur’ân, while describing the list of the women of prohibited degree,
with whom one cannot marry, has extended the prohibition to marrying two sisters
in one time:

And (it is also prohibited) to combine two sisters together. (4:23)

The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) while explaining this verse,
clarified that the prohibition is not restricted to two sisters only. The verse
has, instead, laid down a principle which includes the prohibition of combining
an aunt and her niece, paternal or maternal, as well.

10. The Holy Qur’ân says:

Today the good things have been permitted to you. (5:5)

Here, the “good things” are not explained. The detailed list of the lawful “good
things” has only been given by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
who has described the different kinds of food being not lawful for the Muslims
and not falling in the category of “good things.” Had there been no such
explanation given by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) everybody
could interpret the “good things” according to his own personal desires, and the
very purpose of the revelation, namely, to draw a clear distinction between good
and bad, could have been disturbed. If everybody was free to determine what is
good and what is bad, neither any revelation nor a messenger was called for. It
was through both the Holy Book and the Messenger (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
that the need was fulfilled.

Numerous other examples of this nature may be cited. But the few examples given
above are, perhaps, quite sufficient to show the nature of the explanations
given by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) as well as to establish
their necessity in the framework of an Islâmic life ordained by the Holy Qur’ân
for its followers.

Does the Holy Qur’ân Need Explanation?

Before concluding this discussion, it is pertinent to answer a question often
raised with reference to the explanation of the Holy Qur’ân. The question is
whether the Holy Qur’ân needs anyone to explain its contents? The Holy Qur’ân in
certain places seems to claim that its verses are self-explanatory, easy to
understand and clear in their meanings. So, any external explanation should be
uncalled for. Why, then, is the prophetic explanation so much stressed upon?

The answer to this question is found in the Holy Qur’ân itself. A combined study
of the relevant verses reveals that the Holy Qur’ân deals with two different
types of subjects. One is concerned with the general statements about the simple
realities, and it includes the historic events relating to the former prophets
and their nations, the statement of Allâh’s bounties on mankind, the creation of
the heavens and the earth, the cosmological signs of the divine power and
wisdom, the pleasures of the Paradise and the torture of the Hell, and subjects
of similar nature.

The other type of subjects consists of the imperatives of Sharî’ah, the
provisions of Islâmic law, the details of doctrinal issues, the wisdom of
certain injunctions and other academic subjects.

The first type of subject, which is termed in the Holy Qur’ân as Zikr (the
lesson, the sermon, the advice) is, no doubt, so easy to understand that even an
illiterate rustic can benefit from it without having recourse to anyone else. It
is in this type of subjects that the Holy Qur’ân says:

And surely We have made the Qur’ân easy for Zikr (getting a lesson) so is there
anyone to get a lesson? (54:22)

The words “for Zikr” (getting a lesson) signify that the easiness of the Holy
Qur’ân relates to the subjects of the first nature. The basic thrust of the
verse is on getting lesson from the Qur’ân and its being easy for this purpose
only. But by no means the proposition can be extended to the inference of legal
rules and the interpretation of the legal and doctrinal provisions contained in
the Book. Had the interpretation of even this type of subjects been open to
everybody irrespective of the volume of his learning, the Holy Qur’ân would have
not entrusted the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) with the functions
of “teaching” and “explaining” the Book. The verses quoted earlier, which
introduce the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) as the one who
“teaches” and “explains” the Holy Qur’ân, are explicit on the point that the
Book needs some messenger to teach and interpret it. Regarding the type of
verses which require explanation, the Holy Qur’ân itself says,

And these similitudes We mention before the people. And nobody understands them
except the learned. (29:43)

Thus, the “easiness” of the subjects of the first type does not exclude the
necessity of a prophet who can explain all the legal and practical implications
of the imperatives contained in the Holy Qur’ân.

The Time Limit of the Prophetic
Authority

We have so far studied the two types of the Prophetic authority, first being the
authority to make new laws in addition to those contained in the Holy Qur’ân,
and the second being the authority to explain, interpret and expound the
Qur’ânic injunctions.

But before proceeding to other aspects of the Prophetic authority, another issue
should be resolved just here.

It is sometimes argued by those who hesitate to accept the full authority of the
Sunnah, that whenever the Holy Qur’ân has conferred on the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) an authority to make laws or to explain and
interpret the Book, it meant this authority to be binding on the people of the
Prophet’s (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) time only. They were under the direct
control and the instant supervision of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) and were addressed by him face to face. Therefore, the Prophetic
authority was limited to them only. It cannot be extended to all the generations
for all times to come.

This contention leads us to the discovery of the time limits of the Prophetic
authority. The question is whether the authority of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) was confined to his own time, or it is an everlasting
authority which holds good for all times to come.

The basic question underlying this issue has already been answered in detail;
and that is the question of the nature of this authority. It has been
established through a number of arguments that the obedience of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) was not enjoined upon the Muslims in his capacity
of a ruler. It has been enjoined in his capacity of a prophet. Had it been the
authority of a ruler only which the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
exercised, it would logically be inferred that the authority is tied up with his
rule, and as soon as his administrative rule is over, his authority
simultaneously ceases to have effect.

But if the authority is a “Prophetic” authority, and not merely a “ruling
authority,” then it is obvious that it shall continue with the continuance of
the prophethood, and shall not disappear until the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) no longer remains a prophet.

Now, the only question is whether the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
was a prophet of a particular nation or a particular time, or his prophethood
extended to the whole mankind for all times. Let us seek the answer from the
Holy Qur’ân itself. The Holy Qur’ân says:

Say: O mankind! I am the Messenger of Allâh to you all… (7:158)

And We did not send you (O Prophet) except to the entire mankind, bearing good
news and warning. (34:28)

And We did not send you save as a mercy unto all the worlds. (21:107)

Blessed be He Who has sent down the Qur’ân on His servant so that he may be a
warner to all the worlds. (25:1)

And We have sent you (O Prophet) for mankind as a messenger. And Allâh suffices
to be a witness. (4:79)

And the whole mankind is addressed when it is said:

O mankind! The Messenger has come to you with the truth from your Lord, so
believe: it is better for you. And if you disbelieve, to Allâh belongs what is
in the heavens and in the earth. And Allâh is All-Knowing, All-Wise. (4:170)

The first five verses need no elaboration. They are self-explanatory on the
point that the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) was sent to the whole
mankind and not to a particular people; his prophethood was not limited either
in time or in place.

The fifth verse addresses the whole mankind and enjoins upon all of them to
believe in the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). Nobody can say that
the belief of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) was restricted to
his own time. It is, according to this verse, incumbent upon all the peoples, of
whatever age, to believe in his Prophethood.

It is also mentioned in the Holy Qur’ân that the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) is the last Messenger after whom no Prophet is to come:

Muhammad is not the father of any one of your men, but the Messenger of Allâh
and the last of the prophets. And Allâh is All-Knowing in respect of everything.
(33:40)

This verse made it clear that the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is
the last one in the chain of prophets. The earlier prophets were often sent to a
particular nation for a particular time, because they were succeeded by other
prophets. But no prophet is to come after Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam). Hence, his prophethood extends to all the nations and all the times.
This is what the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) himself explained in
the following words:

The Israelites were led by the prophets. Whenever a prophet would pass away,
another prophet would succeed him. But there is no prophet after me. However,
there shall be successors, and shall be in large numbers. (Sahih al-Bukhari Ch.
50 Hadîth 3455)

If the realm of his prophethood would not reach out to the next generations, the
people of those generations would be left devoid of the prophetic guidance,
while Allâh does not leave any people without prophetic guidance.

In the light of the verses quoted above, there remains no doubt in the fact that
the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is a messenger to all the nations
for all times to come.

If his prophethood extends to all times, there remains no room for the
suggestion that his prophetic authority does no longer hold good and the present
day Muslims are not bound to obey and follow him.

There is another point in the subject worth attention:

It is established through a large number of arguments in the first chapter that
Allâh Almighty sent no divine book without a messenger. It is also clarified by
Allâh that the messengers are sent to teach the Book and to explain it. It is
also proved earlier that but for the detailed explanations of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam), nobody might know even the way of obligatory
prayers.

The question now is whether all these Prophetic explanations were needed only by
the Arabs of the Prophetic age. The Arabs of Makkah were more aware of the
Arabic language than we are. They were more familiar with the Qur’ânic style.
They were physically present at the time of revelation and observed personally
all the surrounding circumstances in which the Holy Book was revealed. They
received the verses of the Holy Qur’ân from the mouth of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) and were fully aware of all the factors which help
in the correct understanding of the text. Still, they needed the explanations of
the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) which were binding on them.

Then, how can a man of ordinary perception presume that the people of this age,
who lack all these advantages, do not need the explanations of a prophet? We
have neither that command on the Arabic language as they had, nor are we so
familiar with the Qur’ânic style as they were, nor have we seen the
circumstances in which the Holy Qur’ân was revealed, as they have seen. If they
needed the guidance of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) in
interpreting the Holy Qur’ân, we should certainly need it all the more.

If the authority of the Holy Qur’ân has no time-limit, if the text of the Qur’ân
is binding on all generations for all times to come, then the authority of the
Messenger, which is included in the very Qur’ân without being limited to any
time bond, shall remain as effective as the Holy Qur’ân itself. While ordaining
for the “obedience of the messenger,” the Holy Qur’ân addressed not only the
Arabs of Makkah or Madînah. It has addressed all the believers when it was said:

O those who believe, obey Allâh and obey the Messenger and those in authority
among you. (4:59)

If the “obedience of Allâh” has always been combined with the “obedience of the
Messenger” as we have seen earlier, there is no room for separating any one from
the other. If one is meant for all times, the other cannot be meant for a
particular period. The Holy Qur’ân at another place has also warned against such
separation between Allâh and His Messenger:

Those who disbelieve in Allâh and His Messengers, and desire to make separation
between Allâh and His Messengers and say, “We believe in some and disbelieve in
some,” desiring to adopt a way in between this and that—those are the
unbelievers in truth; and We have prepared for the disbelievers a humiliating
punishment. (4:150-151)

Therefore, the submission to the authority of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) is a basic ingredient of having belief in his prophethood,
which can never be separated from him. Thus, to accept the prophetic authority
in the early days of Islâm, and to deny it in the later days, is so fallacious a
proposition that cannot find support from any source of Islâmic learning, nor
can it be accepted on any touchstone of logic and reason.

The Prophetic Authority in Worldly
Affairs

Another point of view often presented by some westernised circles is that the
authority of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is, no doubt,
established by the Holy Qur’ân even for all the generations for all times to
come; But, the scope of this authority is limited only to the doctrinal affairs
and the matters of worship. The function of a prophet, according to them, is
restricted to correct the doctrinal beliefs of the ummah and to teach them how
to worship Allâh. As far as the worldly affairs are concerned, they are not
governed by the prophetic authority. These worldly affairs include, in their
view, all the economic, social and political affairs which should be settled
according to the expediency at each relevant time, and the Prophetic authority
has no concern with them. Even if the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
gives some directions in these fields, he does so in his private capacity, and
not as a Messenger. So, it is not necessary for the ummah to comply with such
directions.

To substantiate this proposition, a particular tradition of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is often quoted, though out of context, in which
he said to his companions:

You know more about your worldly affairs.

Before I quote this tradition in its full context, the very concept upon which
this proposition is based needs examination.

In fact, this view is based on a serious misconception about the whole structure
of the Islâmic order.

The misconception is that Islâm, like some other religions, is restricted only
to some doctrines and some rituals. It has no concern with the day-to-day
affairs of the human life. After observing the prescribed doctrines and rituals,
everybody is free to run his life in whatever way he likes, not hindered in any
manner by the divine imperatives. That is why the advocates of this view confine
the Prophetic authority to some doctrines and rituals only.

But, the misconception, however fashionable it may seem to be, is a
misconception. It is an established fact that Islâm, unlike some other religions
which can coincide and co-exist with the secular concept of life, is not merely
a set of doctrines and rituals. It is a complete way of life which deals with
the political, economic and social problems as well as with theological issues.
The Holy Qur’ân says,

O those who
believe, respond to the call of Allâh and His Messenger when he calls you for
what gives you life. (8:24)

It means that Allâh and His Messenger call people towards life. How is it
imagined that the affairs of life are totally out of the jurisdiction of Allâh
and His Messenger? Nobody who has studied the Holy Qur’ân can endorse that its
teachings are limited to worship and rituals. There are specific injunctions in
the Holy Qur’ân about sale, purchase loans, mortgage, partnership, penal laws,
inheritance, matrimonial relations, political affairs, problems of war and peace
and other aspects of international relations. If the Islâmic teachings were
limited to the doctrinal and ritual matters, there is no reason why such
injunctions are mentioned in the Holy Qur’ân.

Likewise the sunnah of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) deals with
the economic, social, political and legal problems in such detail that
voluminous books have been written to compile them. How can it be envisaged that
the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) entered this field in such
detailed manner without having any authority or jurisdiction? The injunctions of
the Holy Qur’ân and sunnah in this field are so absolute, imperative and of
mandatory nature that they cannot be imagined to be personal advices lacking any
legal force.

We have already quoted a large number of verses from the Holy Qur’ân which
enjoin the obedience of Allâh and the Messenger (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
upon the believers. This “obedience” has nowhere been limited to some particular
field. It is an all-embracing obedience which requires total submission from the
believers, having no exception whatsoever.

It is true that in this field, which is termed in the Islâmic law as
“mu’âmalât,” the Holy Qur’ân and sunnah have mostly given some broad principles
and left most of the details open to be settled according to ever-changing
needs, but in strict conformity with the principles laid down by them. Thus the
field not occupied by the Qur’ân and sunnah is a wider field where the
requirements of expediency can well play their role. But it does not mean that
the Qur’ân and sunnah have no concern with this vital branch of human life which
has always been the basic cause of unrest in the history of humanity, and in
which the so-called “rational views” mostly conflicting with each other, have
always fallen prey to satanic desires leading the world to disaster.

Anyhow, the fallacy of this narrow viewpoint about Islâm which excludes all the
practical spheres of life from its pale, rather, to be more correct, makes them
devoid of its guidance, cannot sustain before the overwhelming arguments which
stand to rule it out totally.

The Event of Fecundation of the
Palm-Trees

Let me now turn to the tradition which is
often quoted to support this fallacious view. The details of the tradition are
as follows:

The Arabs of Madînah used to fecundate their palm-trees in order to make them
more fruitful. This operation was called ta’bîr which is explained by E. W. Lane
(Arabic English Lexicon) as below:

“He fecundated a palm-tree by means of the spadix of the male tree, which is
bruised or brayed, and sprinkled upon the spadix of the female; or by inserting
a stalk of a raceme of the male tree into the spathe of the female, after
shaking off the pollen of the former upon the spadix of the female.”

Keeping this in view, read the following tradition, as mentioned by Imâm Muslim
in his Sahîh:

The blessed companion Talhâ (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) says:”I passed along
with the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) across some people who were
on the tops of the palm-trees. The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
asked, ‘What are they doing?’ Some people said, ‘They are fecundating the tree.
They insert the male into the female and the tree stands fecundated.’ The Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) said, ‘I do not think it will be of any
use.’ The people (who were fecundating the trees) were informed about what the
Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) said. So, they stopped this
operation. Then the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) was informed
about their withdrawal. On this, the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
said, ‘If it is in fact useful for them, let them do it, because I had only made
a guess. So, do not cling to me in my guess. But when I tell you something on
behalf of Allâh, take it firm, because I shall never tell a lie on behalf of
Allâh.”

According to the blessed companion Anas (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam), the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) has also said on this occasion:

You know more about your worldly affairs.

The words of this tradition, when looked at in its full context, would clearly
reveal that the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) in this case did not
deliver an absolute prohibition against the fecundation of the palm trees. There
was no question of its being lawful or unlawful. What the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) did was neither a command, nor a legal or
religious prohibition, nor a moral condemnation. It was not even a serious
observation. It was only a remark passed by him by the way in the form of an
instant and general guess, as he himself clarified later. “I do not think it
will be of any use.” Nobody can take this sentence as a legal or religious
observation. That is why the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) did not
address with it the persons involved in the operation, nor did he order to
convey his message to them. It was through some other persons that they learned
about the remark of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam).

Although the remark was not in the form of an imperative, but the blessed
companions of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) used to obey and
follow him in everything, not only on the basis of his legal or religious
authority, but also out of their profound love towards him. They, therefore,
gave up the operation altogether. When the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) came to know about their having abstained from the operation on the
basis of what he remarked, he clarified the position to avoid any
misunderstanding.

The substance of his clarification is that only the absolute statements of the
Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) are binding, because they are given
in his capacity of a prophet on behalf of Allâh Almighty. As for a word spoken
by him as a personal guess, and not as an absolute statement, it should be duly
honoured, but it should not be taken as part of Sharî’ah.

As I have mentioned earlier, there is a vast field in the day-to-day worldly
affairs which is not occupied by the Sharî’ah, where the people have been
allowed to proceed according to their needs and expedience and on the basis of
their knowledge and experience. What instruments should be used to fertilise a
barren land? How the plants should be nourished? What weapons are more useful
for the purpose of defence? What kind of horses are more suitable to ride? What
medicine is useful in a certain disease? The questions of this type relate to
the field where the Sharî’ah has not supplied any particular answer. All these
and similar other matters are left to the human curiosity which can solve these
problems through its efforts.

It is this unoccupied field of mubâhat about which the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) observed:

You know more about your worldly affairs.

But it does not include those worldly affairs in which the Holy Qur’ân or the
sunnah have laid down some specific rules or given a positive command. That is
why the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam), while declaring the matter
of the palm-trees to be in the unoccupied field, has simultaneously observed,
“But when I tell you something on behalf of Allâh, take it firm.”

The upshot of the foregoing discussion is that the sunnah of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is the second source of Islâmic law. Whatever the
Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) said or did in his capacity of a
Messenger is binding on the ummah. This authority of the sunnah is based on the
revelation he received from Allâh. Hence, the obedience of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is another form of the obedience of Allâh. This
prophetic authority which is established through a large number of Qur’ânic
verses, cannot be curtailed, neither by limiting its tenure, nor by exempting
the worldly affairs from its scope.

Chapter 3

The Authority of the Sunnah: Its Historical Aspect

Faced with the
overwhelming arguments in favour of the authority of sunnah, some people resort
to another way of suspecting its credibility, that is, to suspect its historical
authenticity.

According to them, the sunnah of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
though having a binding authority for all times to come, has not been preserved
in a trustworthy manner. Unlike the Holy Qur’ân, they say, there is no single
book containing reliable reports about the sunnah. There are too many works
having a large number of traditions sometimes conflicting each other. And these
books, too, were compiled in the third century of Hijrah. So, we cannot place
our trust in the reports which have not even been reduced to writing during the
first three centuries.

This argument is based on a number of misstatements and misconceptions. As we
shall see in this chapter, inshâ-Allâh, it is totally wrong to claim that the
traditions of the sunnah have been compiled in the third century. But, before
approaching this historical aspect of the sunnah, let us examine the argument in
its logical perspective.

This argument accepts that the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) has a
prophetic authority for all times to come, and that his obedience is mandatory
for all Muslims of whatever age, but in the same breath it claims that the
reports of the sunnah being unreliable, we cannot carry out this obedience. Does
it not logically conclude that Allâh has enjoined upon us to obey the Messenger,
but did not make this obedience practicable. The question is whether Allâh
Almighty may give us a positive command to do something which is beyond our
ability and means. The answer is certainly “no.” The Holy Qur’ân itself says,

Allâh does not task anybody except to his ability.

It cannot be envisaged that Allâh will bind all the people with something which
does not exist or cannot be ascertained. Accepting that Allâh has enjoined upon
us to follow the sunnah of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam), it
certainly implies that the sunnah is not undiscoverable. If Allâh has made it
obligatory to follow the sunnah, He has certainly preserved it for us, in a
reliable form.

The following aspect also merits consideration. Allâh Almighty has given us a
promise in the Holy Qur’ân:

Indeed We have revealed the Zikr (ie. the Qur’ân) and surely We will preserve
it. (15:9)

In this verse, Allâh Almighty has assured the preservation of the Holy Qur’ân.
This implies that the Qur’ân will remain uninterpolated and that it shall always
be transferred from one generation to the other in its real and original form,
undistorted by any foreign element. The question now is whether this divine
protection is restricted only to the words of the Holy Qur’ân or does it extend
to its real meanings as well. If the prophetic explanation is necessary to
understand the Holy Qur’ân correctly, as proved in the first chapter, then the
preservation of the Qur’ânic words alone cannot serve the purpose unless the
prophetic explanations are also preserved. As quoted earlier, the Holy Book
says,

We have revealed to you the Zikr (Qur’ân) so that you may explain to the people
what has been sent down for them.

The word “Zikr” has been used here for the Holy Qur’ân as has been used in the
verse 15:9 and it has been made clear that the people can only benefit from its
guidance when they are led by the explanations of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam).

Again, the words “for the people” indicate (especially in the original Arabic
context), that the Holy Prophet’s (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) explanation is
always needed by “everyone.”

Now, if everyone, in every age is in need of the prophetic explanation, without
which they cannot fully benefit from the Holy Book, how would it be useful for
them to preserve the Qur’ânic text and leave its prophetic explanation at the
mercy of distorters, extending to it no type of protection whatsoever.

Therefore, once the necessity of the prophetic explanations of the Holy Qur’ân
is accepted, it will be self-contradictory to claim that these explanations are
unavailable today. It will amount to negating the divine wisdom, because it is
in no way a wise policy to establish the necessity of the sunnah on the one hand
and to make its discovery impossible on the other. Such a policy cannot be
attributed to Allâh, the All-Mighty, the All-Wise.

This deductive argument is, in my view, sufficient to establish that
comprehending the sunnah of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam),
which is necessary for the correct understanding of the divine guidance, shall
as a whole remain available in a reliable manner forever. All objections raised
against the authenticity of the sunnah as a whole can be repudiated on this
score alone. But in order to study the actual facts, we are giving here a brief
account of the measures taken by the ummah to preserve the sunnah of the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). It is a brief and introductive study of
the subject, for which the comprehensive and voluminous books are available in
Arabic and other languages. The brief account we intend to give here is not
comprehensive. The only purpose is to highlight some basic facts which, if
studied objectively, are well enough to support the deductive inference about
the authenticity of the sunnah.

The Preservation of Sunnah

It is totally
wrong to say that the sunnah of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
was compiled for the first time in the third century. In fact, the compilation
had begun in the very days of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) as
we shall see later, though the compilations in a written form were not the sole
measures adopted for the preservation of the sunnah. There were many other
reliable sources of preservation also. In order to understand the point
correctly we will have to know the different kinds of the sunnah of the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam).

Three Kinds of Ahâdîth

An individual
tradition which narrates a “sunnah” of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) is termed in the relevant sciences as “hadîth” (pl. ahâdîth). The
ahâdîth, with regard to the frequency of their sources, are divided into three
major kinds:

(1) Mutawâtir: It is a hadîth narrated in each era, from the days of the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) up to this day by such a large number of
narrators that it is impossible to reasonably accept that all of them have
colluded to tell a lie.

This kind is further classified into two sub-divisions:

(a) Mutawâtir in words: It is a hadîth whose words are narrated by such a large
number as is required for a mutawâtir, in a manner that all the narrators are
unanimous in reporting it with the same words without any substantial
discrepancy.

(b) Mutawâtir in meaning: It is a mutawâtir hadîth which is not reported by the
narrators in the same words. The words of the narrators are different. Sometimes
even the reported events are not the same. But all the narrators are unanimous
in reporting a basic concept which is common in all the reports. This common
concept is also ranked as a mutawâtir concept.

For example, there is a saying of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam),

Whoever intentionally attributes a lie against me, should prepare his seat in
the Fire.

This is a mutawâtir hadîth of the first kind, because it has a minimum of
seventy-four narrators. In other words, seventy-four companions of the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) have reported this hadîth at different
occasions, all with the same words.

The number of those who received this hadîth from these companions is many times
greater, because each of the seventy-four companions has conveyed it to a number
of his pupils. Thus, the total number of the narrators of this hadîth has been
increasing in each successive generation, and has never been less than
seventy-four. All these narrators, who are now hundreds in number, report it in
the same words without even a minor change. This hadîth is, therefore, mutawâtir
by words, because it cannot be imagined reasonably that such a large number of
people have colluded to coin a fallacious sentence in order to attribute it to
the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam).

On the other hand, it is also reported by such a large number of narrators that
the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) has enjoined us to perform two
rak’ât in Fajr, four rak’ât in Zuhr, ‘Asr and ‘Isha, and three rak’ât in the
Maghrib prayer, yet the narrations of all the reporters who reported the number
of rak’ât are not in the same words. Their words are different. Even the events
reported by them are different. But the common feature of all the reports is the
same. This common feature, namely, the exact number of rak’ât, is said to be
mutawâtir in meaning.

(2) The second kind of hadîth is Mashhoor. This term is defined by the scholars
of hadîth as follows:

“A hadîth which is not mutawâtir, but its narrators are not less than three in
any generation.” [Tadreeb-ur-Râwi by Suyuti]

The same term is also used by the scholars of fiqh, but their definition is
slightly different. They say,

“A mashhoor hadîth is one which was not mutawâtir in the generation of the Holy
Companions, but became mutawâtir immediately after them.” [Usool of Sarkhasi]

The mashhoor hadîth according to each definition falls in the second category
following the mutawâtir.

(3) Khabar-ul-Wâhid. It is a hadîth whose narrators are less than three in any
given generation.

Let us now examine each kind separately.

The Authenticity of the First Two Kinds
As for the mutawâtir, nobody can question its authenticity. The fact narrated by
a mutawâtir chain is always accepted as an absolute truth even if pertaining to
our daily life. Any statement based on a mutawâtir narration must be accepted by
everyone without any hesitation. I have never seen the city of Moscow, but the
fact that Moscow is a large city and is the capital of U.S.S.R. is an absolute
truth which cannot be denied. This fact is proved, to me, by a large number of
narrators who have seen the city. This is a continuously narrated, or a
mutawâtir, fact which cannot be denied or questioned.

I have not seen the events of the First and the Second World War. But the fact
that these two wars occurred stands proved without a shadow of doubt on the
basis of the mutawâtir reports about them. Nobody with a sound sense can claim
that all those who reported the occurrence of these two wars have colluded to
coin a fallacious report and that no war took place at all. This strong belief
in the factum of war is based on the mutawâtir reports of the event.

In the same way the mutawâtir reports about the sunnah of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) are to be held as absolutely true without any iota
of doubt in their authenticity. The authenticity of the Holy Qur’ân being the
same Book as that revealed to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is
of the same nature. Thus, the mutawâtir ahâdîth, whether they be mutawâtir in
words or in meaning, are as authentic as the Holy Qur’ân, and there is no
difference between the two in as far as the reliability of their source of
narration is concerned.

Although the ahâdîth falling under the first category of the mutawâtir, ie. the
mutawâtir in words, are very few in number, yet the ahâdîth relating to the
second kind, namely the mutawâtir in meaning, are available in large numbers.
Thus, a very sizeable portion of the sunnah of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) falls in this kind of mutawâtir, the authenticity of which
cannot be doubted in any manner.

As for the second kind, ie. the mashhoor, its standard of authenticity is lower
than that of the mutawâtir; yet, it is sufficient to provide satisfaction about
the correctness of the narration because its narrators have been more than three
trustworthy persons in every generation.

The third kind is khabar-ul-wâhid. The authenticity of this kind depends on the
veracity of its narrators. If the narrator is trustworthy in all respects, the
report given by him can be accepted, but if the single reporter is believed to
be doubtful, the entire report subsequently remains doubtful. This principle is
followed in every sphere of life. Why should it not be applied to the reports
about the sunnah of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)? Rather, in
the case of ahâdîth, this principle is most applicable, because the reporters of
ahâdîth were fully cognizant of the delicate nature of what they narrate. It was
not simple news of an ordinary event having no legal or religious effect. It was
the narration of a fact which has a far-reaching effect on the lives of millions
of people. The reporters of ahâdîth knew well that it is not a play to ascribe a
word or act to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). Any deliberate
error in this narration, or any negligence in this respect would lead them to
the wrath of Allâh and render them liable to be punished in hell. Every reporter
of hadîth was aware of the following well-known mutawâtir hadîth:

Whoever intentionally attributes a lie against me, should prepare his seat in
the Fire.

This hadîth had created such a strong sense of responsibility in the hearts of
the narrators of ahâdîth that while reporting anything about the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) they often turned pale out of fear, lest some
error should creep into their narration.

This was the basic reason for which the responsible narrators of ahâdîth showed
the maximum precaution in preserving and reporting a hadîth. This standard of
precaution cannot be found in any other reports of historical events. So, the
principle that the veracity of a report depends on the nature of its reporter is
far more validly applicable to the reports of ahâdîth than it is applicable to
the general reports of ordinary nature.

Let us now examine the various ways adopted by the ummah to preserve the ahâdîth
in their original form.

Different Ways of Ahâdîth Preservation

As we shall later
see, the companions of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) reduced a
large number of ahâdîth in writing. Yet, writing was not the sole means of their
preservation. There were many other ways.

1. Memorization

First of all, the companions of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
used to learn ahâdîth by heart. The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
has said:

May Allâh bestow vigor to a person who hears my saying and learns it by heart
and then conveys it to others exactly as he hears it.

The companions of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) were eager to
follow this hadîth and used to devote considerable time for committing ahâdîth
to their memories. A large number of them left their homes and began to live in
the Mosque of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) so that they may
hear the ahâdîth directly from the mouth of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam). They spent all their time exclusively in securing the ahâdîth in
their hearts. They are called Ashâb as-Suffah.

The Arabs had such strong memories that they would easily memorize hundreds of
verses of their poetry. Nearly all of them knew by heart detailed pedigrees of
not only themselves, but also of their horses and camels. Even their children
had enough knowledge of the pedigrees of different tribes. Hammâd is a famous
narrator of Arab poetry. It is reported that he knew by heart one hundred long
poems for each letter of the alphabet, meaning thereby that he knew three
thousand and thirty-eight long poems [al-A’lam by Zrikli 2:131].

The Arabs were so proud of their memory power that they placed more of their
confidence on it than on writing. Some poets deemed it a blemish to preserve
their poetry in writing. They believed that writings on papers can be tampered
with, while the memory cannot be distorted by anyone. If any poets have written
some of their poems, they did not like to disclose this fact, because it would
be indicative of a defect in their memory [See al-Aghani 61:611].

The companions of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) utilized this
memory for preserving ahâdîth which they deemed to be the only source of
guidance after the Holy Qur’ân. It is obvious that their enthusiasm towards the
preservation of ahâdîth far exceeded their zeal for preserving their poetry and
literature. They therefore used their memory in respect of ahâdîth with more
vigor and more precaution.

I have divided my night into three parts: In one third of the night I perform
prayer, in one third I sleep and in one third I memorize the ahâdîth of the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). [Sunan ad-Dârimi]

Sayyidunâ Abû Hurairah ( ), after embracing Islâm, devoted his life exclusively
for learning the ahâdîth. He has reported more ahâdîth than any other companion
of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam).

Once, Marwân, the governor of Madînah, tried to test his memory. He invited him
to his house where he asked him to narrate some ahâdîth. Marwân simultaneously
ordered his scribe, Abu Zu’aizi’ah, to sit behind a curtain and write the
ahâdîth reported by Abû Hurairah ( ). The scribe noted the ahâdîth. After a
year, he invited Abû Hurairah again and requested him to repeat what he had
narrated last year, and likewise ordered Abu Zu’aizi’ah to sit behind a curtain
and compare the present words of Abû Hurairah (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) with
the ahâdîth he had already written previously. Sayyidunâ Abû Hurairah ( ) began
to repeat the ahâdîth while Abu Zu’aizi’ah compared them. He found that Abû
Hurairah did not leave a single word, nor did he change any word from his
earlier narrations [al-Bidâyah wan-Nihâyah and Siyar al-A’lâm of Dhahabi].

Numerous other examples of this type are available in the history of the science
of hadîth which clearly show that the ahâdîth reporters have used their
extraordinary memory power given to them by Allâh Almighty for preserving the
Sunnah of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam), as promised by Him in
the Holy Qur’ân.

As we shall later see, scholars of the science of hadîth developed the science
of Asmâ ur-Rijâl by which they have deduced reliable means to test the memory
power of each narrator of ahâdîth. They never accepted any hadîth as reliable
unless all of its narrators were proved to have high memory standards.

Thus, “memory power” in the science of hadîth is not a vague term of general
nature. It is a technical term having specified criteria to test the veracity of
narrators. A great number of scholars of the sciences of Asmâ ur-Rijâl and Jarh
wa Ta’dîl have devoted their lives to examine the reporters of hadîth on that
criteria. Their task was to judge the memory power of each narrator and to
record objective opinions about them.

Memories of the ahâdîth reporters cannot be compared with the memory of a layman
today who witnesses an event or hears some news and conveys it to others in a
careless manner seldom paying attention to the correctness of his narration. The
following points in this respect are worth mentioning:

1. The reporters of ahâdîth were fully cognizant of the great importance and the
delicate nature of what they intended to report. They whole-heartedly believed
that any misstatement or negligent reporting in this field would cause them to
be condemned both in this world and in the Hereafter. This belief equipped them
with a very strong sense of responsibility. It is evident that such a strong
sense of responsibility makes a reporter more accurate in his reports. A newsman
reporting an accident of a common nature in which common people are involved,
can report its details with less accuracy. But if the accident involves the
President or the Prime Minister of his country, he will certainly show more
diligence, precaution and shall employ his best ability to report the incident
as accurately as possible. The reporter is the same, but in the second case he
is more accurate in his report than he was in the first case, because the nature
of the incident has made him more responsible, hence more cautious.

It cannot be denied that the companions of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam), their pupils, and other reliable narrators of ahâdîth believed with
their heart and soul that the importance of a hadîth attributed to the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) exceeds the importance of any other report
whatsoever. They believed that it is a source of Islâmic law which will govern
the Ummah for all times to come. They believed that any negligence in this
respect will lead them to the severe punishment of hell. So, their sense of
responsibility while reporting ahâdîth was far higher than that of a newsman
reporting an important incident about the head of his country.

2. The interest of the reporter in the reported events and his ability to
understand them correctly is another important factor which affects the accuracy
of his report. If the reporter is indifferent or negligent about what he
reports, little reliability can be placed on his memory or on any subsequent
report based on it. But if the reporter is not only honest, serious, and
intelligent but also interested and involved in the event, his report can easily
be relied upon.

If some proceedings are going on in a court of law, the reports of these
proceedings can be of different kinds. One report was given by a layman from the
audience who was incidentally present at the court. He had neither any interest
in the proceedings nor had due knowledge and understanding of the legal issues
involved. He gathered a sketchy picture of the proceedings and reported it to a
third person. Such a report can neither be relied upon nor taken as an authentic
version of the proceedings. This report may be full of errors because the
reporter lacks the ability to understand the matter correctly and the
responsible attitude to report it accurately. Such a reporter may not only err
in his reporting, but may after some time also forget the proceedings
altogether.

Suppose there are some newsmen also who have witnessed the proceedings for the
purpose of reporting them in their newspapers. They have more knowledge and
understanding than a layman of the first kind. Their report shall be more
correct than that of the former. But despite their interest and intelligence,
they are not fully aware of the technical and legal questions involved in the
proceedings. Their report shall thus remain deficient in the legal aspect of the
proceedings and cannot be relied upon to that extent because despite their good
memory, they cannot grasp the legal issues completely.

There were also lawyers who were directly involved in the proceedings. They
participated in the debate at the bar. They have argued the case. They were
fully aware of the delicate legal issues involved. They understood each and
every sentence expressed by other lawyers and the judge. It is obvious that the
report of the proceedings given by these lawyers shall be the most authentic
one. Having full knowledge and understanding of the case they can neither forget
nor err while reporting the substantial and material parts of the proceedings.

Suppose all the three categories had the same standard of memory power. Yet, the
facts narrated by them have different levels of correctness. It shows that the
interest of the reporter in the reported event and his understanding of the
facts involved plays an important role in making his memory more effective and
accurate.

The deep interest of the companions of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) in his sayings and acts, rather even in his gestures, is beyond any
doubt. Their understanding of what he said, and their close knowledge and
observation of the background and the environment under which he spoke or acted
cannot be questioned. Thus, all the basic factors which help mobilize one’s
memory were present in them.

3. The standard of memory power required for the authenticity of a report is
not, as mentioned earlier, a vague concept for which no specific criteria exist.
The scholars of the Science of hadîth have laid down hard and fast rules to
ascertain the memory standard of each reporter. Unless a reporter of a hadîth
has specific standards of memory, his reports and not accepted as reliable.

4. There is a big difference between memorizing a fact which incidentally came
to the knowledge of someone who never cared to remember it any more, and the
memorizing of a fact which is learnt by someone with eagerness, with an
objective purpose to remember it and with a constant effort to keep it in
memory.

While I studied Arabic, my teacher told me many things which I do not remember
today. But the vocabulary I learnt from my teacher is secured in my mind. The
reason is obvious. I never cared to keep the former remembered, while I was very
much eager to learn the latter by heart and to store it in my memory.

The companions of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) did not listen
to him incidentally nor were they careless in remembering what they heard.
Instead, they daily spared specific times for learning the ahâdîth by heart. The
example of Abû Hurairah has already been cited. He used to spare one third of
every night in repeating the ahâdîth he learnt from the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam).

Thus, memorization was not a weaker source of preservation of ahâdîth, as is
sometimes presumed by those who have no proper knowledge of the science of
hadîth. Looked at in its true perspective, the memories of the reliable
reporters of ahâdîth were no less reliable a source of preservation than
compiling the ahâdîth in book form.

2. Discussions

The second source of preservation of ahâdîth was by mutual discussions held by
the companions of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). Whenever they
came to know of a new sunnah, they used to narrate it to others. Thus, all the
companions would tell each other what they learnt from the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). This was to comply with the specific directions
given by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) in this respect. Here
are some ahâdîth to this effect:

Those present should convey (my sunnah) to those absent [Bukhari].

Convey to others on my behalf, even though it be a single verse [Bukhari].

May Allâh grant vigor to a person who listens to my saying and learns it by
heart until he conveys it to others [Tirmidhi, Abu Dâwûd].

You hear (my sayings) and others will hear from you, then others will hear from
them [Abu Dâwûd].

A Muslim cannot offer his brother a better benefit than transmitting to him a
good hadîth which has reached him [Jâmi’-ul-Bayân of Ibn ‘Abdul Barr].

These directions given by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) were
more than sufficient to induce his companions towards acquiring the knowledge of
ahâdîth and to convey them to others.

The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) also motivated his companions to
study the ahâdîth in their meetings. The word used for this study is Tadarus
which means “to teach each other.” One person would narrate a particular hadîth
to the other who, in turn, would repeat it to the first, and so on. The purpose
was to learn it correctly. Each one would listen to the other’s version and
correct his mistake, if any. The result of this tadarus (discussion) was to
remember the ahâdîth as firmly as possible. The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) has held this described process of tadarus to be more meritorious
with Allâh than the individual worship throughout the night. He has said:

Tadarus of knowledge (the word “knowledge” in the era of Nabî (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) was used to connote knowledge relative to the Holy Qur’ân and the
hadîth) for any period of time in the night is better than spending the entire
night in worship [Jâmi’-ul-Bayân].

Moreover, the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) has also warned, that
it is a major sin to hide a word of “knowledge” whenever it is asked for:

Whoever is questioned pertaining to such knowledge that he has and thereafter
conceals it, will be bridled by a rein of fire [Tirmidhi].

At another occasion, the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) disclosed
that concealment of “knowledge” is in itself a major sin, even though the person
having that knowledge is not asked about it. He said:

Whoever conceals knowledge which can be benefited from, will come on Doomsday
bridled with a bridle of fire [Jâmi’-ul-Bayân].

The hadîth makes it clear that the disclosure of knowledge is an inherent
obligation on each knowledgeable person, no matter whether he is asked about it
or not.

As the knowledge of the sunnah of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
was the highest branch of knowledge in the eyes of his companions, they deemed
it an indispensable obligation on their shoulders to convey to others what they
knew of the sunnah.

Thus, it was the most favorite hobby of the companions of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) whenever they sat together, instead of being
involved in useless talks, to discuss his sayings and acts. Each of them would
mention what he knew while the others would listen and try to learn it by heart.

These frequent discussions have played an important role in the preservation of
the Sunnah. It was by the virtue of these discussions that the ahâdîth known
only by some individuals were conveyed to others, and the circle of narrators
was gradually enlarged. Since these discussions were carried out at a time when
the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) was himself present among them,
they had the full opportunity to confirm the veracity of what has been conveyed
to them in this process, and some of them actually did so. The result was that
the knowledge of ahâdîth acquired a wide range among the companions, which not
only helped in spreading the knowledge of Sunnah but also provided a check on
the mistakes of narrations, because if someone forgets some part of a hadîth,
the others were present to fill in the gap and to correct the error.

3. Practice

The third way of preservation of the Sunnah was to bring it into practice.

The knowledge of Sunnah was not merely a theoretical knowledge, nor were the
teachings of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) merely
philosophical. They related to practical life. The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) did not confine himself to giving lessons and sermons only, he
also trained his companions practically. Whatever they learnt from the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) they spared no effort to bring it into
actual practice. Each companion was so enthusiastic in practicing the Sunnah of
the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) that he tried his best to imitate
even his personal habits.

Thus the whole atmosphere was one of following the Sunnah. The Sunnah was not a
verbal report only, it was a living practice, a widespread behavior and a
current fashion demonstrating itself everywhere in the society, in all the
affairs of their daily life.

If a student of mathematics confines himself with remembering the formulas
orally, he is likely to forget them after a lapse of time, but if he brings them
in practice, ten times a day, he shall never forget them.

Likewise, the Sunnah was not an oral service carried out by the companions. They
brought it into their daily practice. The Sunnah was the center of gravity for
all their activities. How could they forget the Sunnah of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) around which they built the structure of their
whole lives?

Thus, constant practice in accordance with the dictates of the Sunnah was
another major factor which advanced the process of preserving the Sunnah and
protected it from the foreign elements aiming at its distortion.

4. Writing

The fourth way of preserving of ahâdîth was writing. Quite a large number of the
companions of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) reduced the ahâdîth
to writing after hearing them from the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam).

It is true that in the beginning the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
had forbidden some of his companions from writing anything other than the verses
of the Holy Qur’ân. However, this prohibition was not because the ahâdîth had no
authoritative value, but because the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
had in the same breath ordered them to narrate his ahâdîth orally. The full text
of the relevant hadîth is as follows:

Do not write (what you hear) from me, and whoever has written something (he
heard) from me, he should erase it. Narrate to others (what you hear) from me;
and whoever deliberately attributes a lie to me, he should prepare his seat in
the Fire.” [Sahih Muslim]

The underlined phrase of the hadîth clarifies that prohibition for writing
hadîth was not on account of negating its authority. The actual reason was that
in the beginning of the revelation of the Holy Qur’ân, the companions of the
Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) were not fully familiar with the
Qur’ânic style, nor was the Holy Qur’ân compiled in a separate book form. In
those days some companions began to write the ahâdîth along with the Qur’ânic
text. Some explanations of the Holy Qur’ân given by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) were written by some of them mixed with the Qur’ânic verses
without any distinction between the two. It was therefore feared that it would
lead to confuse the Qur’ânic text with the ahâdîth.

It was in this background that the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
stopped this practice and ordered that anything written other than the Holy
Qur’ân should be rubbed or omitted. It should be kept in mind that in those days
there was a great shortage of writing paper. Even the verses of the Holy Qur’ân
used to be written on pieces of leather, on planks of wood, on animal bones and
sometimes on stones. It was much difficult to compile all those things in a book
form, and if the ahâdîth were also written in the like manner it would be more
difficult to distinguish between the writings of the Holy Qur’ân and those of
the ahâdîth. The lack of familiarity with the Qur’ânic style would also help
creating confusion.

For these reasons the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) directed his
companions to abstain from writing the ahâdîth and to confine their preservation
to the first three ways which were equally reliable as discussed earlier.

But all this was in the earlier period of his prophethood. When the companions
became fully conversant of the style of the Holy Qur’ân and writing paper became
available, this transitory measure of precaution was taken back, because the
danger of confusion between the Qur’ân and the hadîth no longer existed.

At this stage, the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) himself directed
his companions to write down the ahâdîth. Some of his instructions in this
respect are quoted below:

1. One companion from the Ansâr complained to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) that he hears from him some ahâdîth, but he sometimes forgets
them. The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) said:

“Seek help from your right hand,” and pointed out to a writing. [Jâmi’ Tirmidhi]

2. Râfi’ ibn Khadij ( ), the famous companion of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) says, “I said to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) [that] we hear from you many things, should we write them down?” He
replied:

It is reported that the ahâdîth written by Abu Râfi’ ( ) were copied by other
companions too. Salma, a pupil of Ibn ‘Abbâs ( ) says:

I saw some small wooden boards with ‘Abdullâh Ibn ‘Abbâs. He was writing on them
some reports of the acts of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) which
he acquired from Abu Râfi’. [Tabaqât Ibn Sa’d]

In another report he says, “I came to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) and told him, ‘I want to narrate your ahâdîth. So, I want to take
assistance of my handwriting besides my heart. Do you deem it fit for me?’ The
Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) replied, ‘If it is my hadîth you may
seek help from your hand besides your heart.” [Sunan Dârimi]

6. It was for this reason that he used to write ahâdîth frequently. He himself
says,

I used to write whatever I heard from the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) and wanted to learn it by heart. Some people of the Quraysh dissuaded
me and said, “Do you write everything you hear from the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam), while he is a human being and sometimes he may be in anger as
any other human beings may be?” [Sunan Abu Dâwûd]

They meant that the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) might say
something in a state of anger which he did not seriously intend. So, one should
be selective in writing his ahâdîth. ‘Abdullâh ibn ‘Amr conveyed their opinion
to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). In reply, the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) pointed to his lips and said,

I swear by the One in whose hands is the soul of Muhammad: nothing comes out
from these two (lips) except truth. So, do write. [Sunan Abu Dâwud; Tabaqât ibn
Sa’d; Mustadrik-ul-Hâkim]

It was a clear and absolute order given by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) to write each and every saying of his without any hesitation or doubt
about its authoritative nature.

In compliance to this order, ‘Abdullâh ibn ‘Amr wrote a large number of ahâdîth
and compiled them in a book form which he named, “al-Sahîfah al-Sadîqah.” Some
details about this book shall be discussed later on, inshâ-Allâh.

7. During the conquest of Makkah (8 A.H.), the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) delivered a detailed sermon containing a number of Sharî’ah
imperatives, including human rights. One Yemenite person from the gathering,
namely, Abu Shah, requested the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) to
provide him the sermon in a written form. The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) thereafter ordered his companions as follows:

Write it down for Abu Shah. [Sahîh-ul-Bukhâri]

These seven examples are more than sufficient to prove that the writing of
ahâdîth was not only permitted but also ordered by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) and that the earlier bar against writing was only for a
transitory period to avoid any possible confusion between the verses of the Holy
Qur’ân and the ahâdîth. After this transitory period the fear of confusion
ended, the bar was lifted and the companions were persuaded to preserve ahâdîth
in a written form.

The Compilation of Hadîth in the Days
of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)

We have discussed the different methods undertaken by the companions of the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) to preserve the ahâdîth. An objective
study of these methods would prove that although ‘writing’ was not the sole
method of their preservation, yet it was never neglected in this process.
Inspired by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) himself, a large
number of his companions used to secure the ahâdîth in written form.

When we study individual efforts of the companions for compiling ahâdîth, we
find that thousands of ahâdîth were written in the very days of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) and his four Caliphs. It is not possible to give
an exhaustive survey of these efforts, for it will require a separate voluminous
book on the subject which is not intended here. Nevertheless, we propose to give
a brief account of some outstanding compilations of ahâdîth in that early
period. It will, at least, refute the misconception that the ahâdîth were not
compiled during the first three centuries.

The Dictations of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)

To begin with, we would refer to the fact that a considerable number of ahâdîth
were dictated and directed to be secured in written form by the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) himself. Here are some examples:

The Book of Sadaqah

The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) has dictated detailed documents
containing rules of Sharî’ah about the levy of Zakâh, and specifying the quantum
and the rate of Zakâh in respect of different Zakât-able assets. This document
was named “Kitâb as-Sadaqah” (The Book of Sadaqah). ‘Abdullâh ibn ‘Umar
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) says,

The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) dictated the Book of Sadaqah and
was yet to send it to his governors when he passed away. He had attached it to
his sword. When he passed away, Abu Bakr acted according to it till he passed
away, then ‘Umar acted according to it till he passed away. It was mentioned in
his book that one goat is leviable on five camels… [Jâmi’ Tirmidhi]

The text of this document is available in several books of ahâdîth like the
Sunan of Abu Dâwûd. Imâm Zuhri, the renowned scholar of hadîth, used to teach
this document to his pupils. He used to say:

This is the text of the document dictated by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) about the rules of Sadaqah (Zakâh). Its original manuscript is with
the children of Sayyiduna ‘Umar. Salim, the grandson of ‘Umar had taught it to
me. I had learnt it by heart. ‘Umar ibn ‘Abdul-Azîz had procured a copy of this
text from Salim and ‘Abdullah, the grandsons of ‘Umar. I have the same copy with
me. [Sunan Abu Dâwûd]

The Script of ‘Amr ibn Hazm
In 10 A.H., when Najran was conquered by the Muslims, the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) appointed his companion, ‘Amr ibn Hazm ( ), as
governer of the province of Yemen. At this time the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) dictated a detailed book to Ubayy ibn Ka’b ( ) and handed it
over to ‘Amr ibn Hazm.

Sayyiduna ‘Amr ibn Hazm performed his functions as governor of Yemen in the
light of this book. After his demise this document remained with his grandson,
Abu Bakr. Imâm Zuhri learnt and copied it from him. He used to teach it to his
pupils. [Certain extracts of this book are found in the works of hadîth. For the
full text see, al-Wathâ’iq as-Sayâsiyyah fil-Islâm by Dr. Hamîdullâh.]

Written Directives to Other Governors

Similarly, when the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) appointed some of
his companions as governors of different provinces he used to dictate to them
similar documents as his directives which they could follow in performing their
duties as rulers or as judges. When he appointed Abu Hurairah and Ala ibn
al-Hazrami as his envoy to the Zoroastrians of Hajar, he dictated to them a
directive containing certain rules of Sharî’ah about Zakâh and ‘Ushr. [Tabaqât
Ibn Sa’d]

Likewise, when he sent Mu’âdh ibn Jabal and Malik ibn Murarah to Yemen, he gave
them a document dictated by him which contained certain rules of Sharî’ah.
[ibid]

Written Directives for Certain
Delegations

Certain Arab tribes who lived in remote areas far from Madînah, after embracing
Islâm used to send their delegations to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam). These delegations used to stay at Madînah for a considerable period
during which they would learn the teachings of Islâm, read the Holy Qur’ân and
listen to the sayings of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). When
they returned to their homes, some of them requested the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) to dictate some instructions for them and for
their tribes. The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) used to accept this
request and would dictate some directives containing such rules of Sharî’ah as
they most needed.

The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) dictated three documents to
Sayyiduna Mu’awiyah (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). One of these documents
pertained to personal problems of Wa’il ibn Hujr, while the other two consisted
of certain general precepts of Sharî’ah concerning Salâh, Zakâh, prohibition of
liquor, usury, and certain other matters. [ibid]

2. Munqiz ibn Hayyan ( ), a member of the tribe of Abdul-Qais, came to the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) and embraced Islâm. While returning home
he was given a written document by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) which he carried to his tribe but initially he did not disclose it to
anyone. When, due to his efforts, his father-in-law embraced Islâm, he handed
over the document to him who in turn read it before his tribe which subsequently
embraced Islâm. It was after this that the famous delegation of Abdul-Qais came
to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). The detailed narration is
found in the books of Bukhâri and Muslim. [Mirqât Sharh Mishkât; Sharh
an-Nawawi]

3. The delegation of the tribe of Ghamid came to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) and embraced Islâm. The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) sent them to Sayyiduna Ubayy ibn Ka’b who taught them the Holy Qur’ân
and:

the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) dictated for them a book
containing injunctions of Islâm. [Tabaqât Ibn Sa’d]

4. The delegation of the tribe of Khath’am came to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam). While discussing their arrival Ibn Sa’d reports on the
authority of different reliable narrators:

They said, “We believe in Allâh, His messenger and in whatever has come from
Allâh. So, write for us a document that we may follow.” The Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) wrote for them a document. Jarir ibn ‘Abdullâh and
those present stood as witnesses to that document. [ibid]

5. The delegation of the tribes of Sumalah and Huddan came after the conquest of
Makkah. They embraced Islâm. The Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
dictated for them a document containing Islâmic injunctions about Zakâh.
Sayyiduna Thâbit ibn Qais had written the document and Sa’d ibn Ubâdah and
Muhammad ibn Maslamah stood as witnesses. [ibid]

6. The same Thâbit ibn Qais (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) also wrote a document
dictated by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) for the delegation of
the tribe of Aslam. The witnesses were Abu Ubaidah ibn al-Jarrah and ‘Umar ibn
al-Khattâb.

These are only a few examples which are neither comprehensive nor exhaustive.
Many other instances of the same nature are found in only one book, namely the
Tabaqât of Ibn Sa’d. A thorough research in all the relevant books would
certainly expose a large number of like events for which a more detailed book is
required.

All these examples refer to those events only where the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) dictated documents containing general Islâmic injunctions. He
has also dictated numerous official documents in individual cases. The large
number of such documents prevents us from providing even a short reference to
all of them in this brief study. All these documents also form part of the
Sunnah and a large number of Islâmic injunctions are inferred from them. In
brevity, we instead would only refer to a work of Dr. Muhammad Hamîdullâh,
namely, al-Wathâ’iq as-Siyâsiyyah, in which he has compiled a considerable
number of such documents. Those who desire further study may peruse the same.

The Compilations of Hadîth by the
Companions of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)

As discussed
earlier, the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) has not only permitted
but also persuaded his companions to write down his ahâdîth. In pursuance of
this direction, the blessed companions of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) used to write ahâdîth, and a considerable number of them have
compiled these writings in book forms. Some examples are given below.

The Scripts of Abu Hurairah (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
It is well-known that Abu Hurairah (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) has narrated
more ahâdîth than any other companion of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam). The number of ahâdîth reported by him is said to be 5374. The reason
was that he, after embracing Islâm, devoted his full life for the sole purpose
of bearing and preserving the ahâdîth of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam). Unlike the other famous companions, he did not employ himself in any
economic activity. He used to remain in the mosque of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) to hear what he said and to witness each event
around him. He remained hungry, faced starvations and hardships. Yet, he did not
leave the function he had undertaken.

There are concrete evidences that he had preserved the ahâdîth in written form.
One of his pupils, namely, Hasan ibn ‘Amr reports that once:

Abu Hurairah ( ) took him to his home and showed him “many books” containing the
ahâdîth of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). [Jâmi’ Bayân-ul-‘Ilm;
Fath-ul-Bâri]

It shows that Abu Hurairah had many scripts of ahâdîth with him. It is also
established that a number of his pupils had prepared several scripts of his
narrations.

The Script of ‘Abdullâhi ibn ‘Amr (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam)
It has been stated earlier that ‘Abdullâh ibn ‘Amr was specifically instructed
by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) to write ahâdîth. He therefore
compiled a big script and named it “As-Sahîfah as-Sâdiqah” (The script of
truth). ‘Abdullâh ibn ‘Amr was very precautious in preserving this script.
Mujâhid, one of his favorite pupils says, “I went to ‘Abdullâh ibn ‘Amr and took
in hand a script placed beneath his cushion. He stopped me. I said, ‘You never
save anything from me.’ He replied:

This is the Sâdiqah (the Script of Truth). It is what I heard from the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). No other narrator intervenes between him
and myself. If this script, the Book of Allâh, and wahaz (his agricultural land)
are secured for me, I would never care about the rest of the world. [Jâmi’
Bayân-ul-‘Ilm]

This script remained with his children. His grandson, ‘Amr ibn Shu’aib used to
teach the ahâdîth contained in it. Yahyâ ibn Ma’in and ‘Ali ibn al-Madini have
said that every tradition reported by ‘Amr ibn Shu’aib in any book of hadîth has
been taken from this script [Tahdhîb at-Tahdhîb]. Ibn al-Asir says that this
script contained one thousand ahâdîth. [Asad-ul-Ghâbah

The Script of Anas (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)

Sayyiduna Anas ibn Mâlik (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) was one of those
companions of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) who knew writing.
His mother had brought him to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
when he was ten years old. He remained in the service of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) for ten years during which he heard a large number
of ahâdîth and wrote them down. Sa’îd ibn Hilal, one of his pupils, says,

When we insisted upon Anas, may Allâh be pleased with him, he would bring to us
some notebooks and say, “These are what I have heard and written from the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam), after which I have presented them to the
Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) for confirmation. [Mustadrik Hâkim]

It shows that Sayyiduna Anas ( ) had not only written a large number of ahâdîth
in several notebooks, but had also showed them to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) who had confirmed them.The Script of ‘Ali

It is well known that Sayyiduna ‘Ali (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) had a script
of ahâdîth with him. He says,

I have not written anything from the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
except the Holy Qur’ân and what is contained in this script. [Sahîh Bukhâri-
Book of Jihad]

Imâm Bukhâri has mentioned this script at six different places of his Sahîh. A
combined study of all those places reveals that this script was substantially
large and it consisted of ahâdîth about qisâs (retaliation), diyah (blood
money), fidyah (ransom), rights of the non-Muslim citizens of an Islamic state,
some specific kinds of inheritance, zakâh rules pertaining to camels of
different ages, and some rules about the sanctity of the city of Madînah.

The script was written by Sayyiduna ‘Ali (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) in the
days of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). Then, in the days of his
khilâfah (rule), he felt that the ahâdîth of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) should be spread among the people to widen the range of Islamic
knowledge and to refute certain misguided ideas prevalent in those days.

It is reported by the famous historian Ibn Sa’d that he stood in the mosque and
delivered a lecture. Then he asked the people,

“Who will purchase ‘knowledge’ for one dirham only?”

He meant that whoever wanted to learn ahâdîth, should buy writing paper for one
dirham and come to him, for dictation of the ahâdîth of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam).

It is reported that Hârith al-A’war bought some paper and came to him:

So, (‘Ali) wrote for him a lot of knowledge. [Tabaqât Ibn Sa’d]

It should be kept in mind that the word “knowledge” in the early centuries of
Islamic history was used for the knowledge of ahâdîth only. [ibid]

Scripts of Jâbir (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
Jâbir ibn ‘Abdullâh (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is one of the famous
companions of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) who has narrated a
large number of ahâdîth. It is established that he had compiled the ahâdîth in
two scripts. One of them contained a detailed account of the last Hajj performed
by the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). The full text of this script
is found in the Sahîh of Muslim wherein he has described even the minute details
of the last Hajj. [Sahîh Muslim- Book of Hajj. Dhahabi says that this is a
replica of Jâbir’s script.]

His second script contained other ahâdîth relating to different subjects.

Qatâdah, the famous pupil of Jâbir, says,

I remember the script of Jâbir more than I remember Surah al-Baqarah (of the
Holy Qur’ân). [Tahdhîb at-Tahdhîb]

Reference to this script is also found in the Musannaf of ‘Abdurrazzâq where
some ahâdîth of this script are reported.

Scripts of Ibn ‘Abbâs (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam)

‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbâs (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) was the cousin of the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). When the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) passed away, he was yet very young. In order to preserve ahâdîth, he
began to compile what he himself heard from the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) as well as those narrated by other companions. Whenever he came to
know of any companion having some ahâdîth, he would travel to him to hear them.
All such ahâdîth were compiled by him in several scripts. These scripts numbered
so many that they could be loaded on a camel. These scripts remained with his
pupil Kuraib. Musa ibn ‘Uqbah, the famous historian, says:

Kuraib left with us a camel load of Ibn ‘Abbâs’s books. When ‘Ali ibn ‘Abdullâh
ibn ‘Abbâs would need any book from them, he wrote to Kuraib, ‘Send to me such
and such books.’ He would then transcribe the book and send to him one of the
two copies. [Tabaqât Ibn Sa’d]

The pupils of Ibn ‘Abbâs would copy these scripts and read them over to him to
confirm the correctness of the copies. [Jâmi’ at-Tirmidhi]

Sometimes Ibn ‘Abbâs would narrate the ahâdîth to his pupils while they would
record them. [Sunan Dârimi]

These are only a few examples of efforts made by the companions of the Holy
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) for the compilation of ahâdîth. We do not
intend here to present an exhaustive survey of such efforts. Detailed books can
be consulted for this purpose. Our purpose here was to give only some examples.
These concrete examples are more than sufficient to refute the fallacious
assumption that the ahâdîth were never written in the days of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) and his companions.

The Compilation of Ahâdîth in the Era
After the Companions

The history of the compilation of ahâdîth after the companions is even more vast
and detailed. Each companion who narrated the ahâdîth had a large number of
pupils who compiled what they heard from him. The pupils of the companions are
called “Tâbi’în.”

The compilations of the Tâbi’în were generally not arranged subject wise, though
some of them have arranged the ahâdîth under subjective headings. The first
known book of hadîth which is so arranged is Al-Abwâb of Imâm Sha’bi (19-103
A.H.). This book was divided into various chapters. Each chapter contained the
ahâdîth relating to the same subject like salâh, zakâh, etc.

This proves that the first book of ahâdîth arranged in a regular manner appeared
in the very first century. Another book was written by Hasan al-Basri (d.110) in
which he compiled ahâdîth containing any explanations or commentaries of the
Holy Qur’ân [Tadrîb ar-Râwi]. This was also a regular book written on a
particular subject which appeared in the first century.

In the era of the Tâbi’în the compilation of ahâdîth was undertaken officially
by the famous khalîfah, ‘Umar ibn ‘Abdul-Azîz (99-101 A.H.). He issued an
official order to all governors under his domain that they should gather the
knowledgeable persons from among the companions of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) and their pupils and write down the ahâdîth found with them
[Fath al-Bâri].

The result of this official decree was that several books of ahâdîth were
prepared and spread all over the country. Ibn Shihâb az-Zuhri was one of the
pioneers of the compilation of hadîth in this period. He has written a number of
books.

All these books and scripts written in this period were afterwards included in
the larger books of hadîth written later on, as is usual in the evolution of
every science. The separate entity of these books and scripts, being uncalled
for, was not much attended to. Thus, the larger books written in the second and
third centuries gradually took their place, and being more comprehensive,
detailed, and sufficient, they were so widely spread and studied that the books
of the Tâbi’în no longer remained on the scene.

However, some manuscripts of these books were preserved. Later books were
compared and confirmed by such preserved manuscripts.

One of the books written in the days of the Tâbi’în was the script of Hammam ibn
Munabbih, a pupil of Abu Hurairah, who prepared a book containing ahâdîth he
heard from Abu Hurairah (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). This book is also known
as “As-Sahîfah as-Sahîhah.” All the ahâdîth of this book were included in later
compilations. The full text of it is also found in the Musnad of Imâm Ahmad. The
original script of this book was thus not attended to and was lost for a
considerable time.

In 1373 A.H. (1954 C.E.), two manuscripts of this book were discovered in the
libraries of Berlin and Damascus, and were published by Dr. Muhammad Hamidullah
with a detailed introduction.

Dr. Muhammad Hamidullah edited these manuscripts which were written centuries
ago. He has also compared their text with the one narrated in the Musnad of Imâm
Ahmad. He could not find any material difference between the two texts. There
are a few very minor differences of negligible words which always exist between
two manuscripts of the same book.

It proves that the books of the Tâbi’în were included and were thus made part of
the later books of hadîth, with all necessary precautions by which they can
safely be relied upon.

The Compilations of the First Century

We present here a list of hadîth works written by the Tâbi’în in the first and
second centuries. In the first century the following books of hadîth were
compiled by the Tâbi’în:

1. Book of Khalid ibn Ma’dan (d. 104)

2. Books of Abu Qilabah (d. 104). He bequeathed his books to his pupil, Ayyub
Saktiyan (68-131 A.H.), who paid more than ten dirhams as a fare for them being
loaded on a camel.

3. The script of Hammam ibn Munabbih, already referred to.

4. Books of Hasan al-Basri (21-110 A.H.)

5. Books of Muhammad al-Baqir (56-114 A.H.)

6. Books of Makhul from Syria

7. Book of Hakam ibn ‘Utaibah

8. Book of Bukair ibn ‘Abdullah ibn al-Ashajj (d. 117)

9. Book of Qais ibn Sa’d (d. 117). This book later belonged to Hammad ibn
Salamah.

10. Book of Sulaiman al-Yashkuri

11. Al-Abwâb of Sha’bi, already referred to.

12. Books of Ibn Shihâb az-Zuhri

13. Book of Abul-‘Aliyah

14. Book of Sa’id ibn Jubair (d. 95)

15. Books of ‘Umar ibn ‘Abdul Aziz (61-101 A.H.)

16. Books of Mujahid ibn Jabr (d. 103)

17. Book of Raja ibn Hywah (d. 112)

18. Book of Abu Bakr ibn Muhammad ibn ‘Amr ibn Haq

19. Book of Bashir ibn Nahik.

The Books of Hadîth Written in the
Second Century

The basic characteristic of the books written in the second century is that a
large number of them were arranged subject-wise, while the books of the first
century were not. However, compilations without due arrangement continued in
this century too. The list of books compiled in this period is very long. A few
prominent books are referred to here:

1. Book of ‘Abdul Malik ibn Juraij (d. 150)

2. Muwatta of Malik ibn Anas (93-179)

3. Muwatta of Ibn Abi Zi’b (80-158)

4. Maghâzi of Muhammad ibn Ishaq (d. 151)

5. Musnad of Rabi’ ibn Sabih (d. 160)

6. Book of Sa’id ibn Abi ‘Arubah (d. 156)

7. Book of Hammad ibn Salmah (d. 167)

8. Jami’ Sufyan ath-Thauri (97-161)

9. Jami’ Ma’mar ibn Rashid (95-153)

10. Book of ‘Abdur-Rahman al-Awzâ’I (88-157)

11. Kitâb az-Zuhd by ‘Abdullâh ibn al-Mubârak (118-181)

12. Book of Hushaim ibn Bashir (104-183)

13. Book of Jarir ibn ‘Abdul-Hamid (110-188)

14. Book of ‘Abdullâh ibn Wahb (125-197)

15. Book of Yahya ibn Abi Kathîr (d. 129)

16. Book of Muhammad ibn Suqah (d. 135)

17. Tafsîr of Zaid ibn Aslam (d. 136)

18. Book of Musa ibn ‘Uqbah (d. 141)

19. Book of Ash’ath ibn ‘Abdul-Malik (d. 142)

20. Book of Aqil ibn Khalid (d. 142)

21. Book of Yahya ibn Sa’id Ansari (d. 143)

22. Book of Awf ibn Abi Jamilah (d. 146)

23. Books of Jafar ibn Muhammad al-Sadiq (d. 148)

24. Books of Yunus ibn Yazid (d. 152)

25. Book of ‘Abdur-Rahman al-Mas’udi (d. 160)

26. Books of Zaidah ibn Qudamah (d. 161)

27. Books of Ibrahim al-Tahman (d. 163)

28. Books of Abu Hamzah al-Sukri (d. 167)

29. Al-Gharâib by Shu’bah ibn al-Hajjaj (d. 160)

30. Books of ‘Abdul-Aziz ibn ‘Abdullâh al-Majishun (d. 164)

31. Books of ‘Abdullâh ibn ‘Abdullâh ibn Abi Uwais (d. 169)

32. Books of Sulaiman ibn Bilal (d. 172)

33. Books of ‘Abdullâh ibn Lahi’ah (d. 147)

34. Jami’ Sufyan ibn ‘Uyainah (d. 198)

35. Kitâb-ul-Âthâr by Imâm Abu Hanîfah (d. 150)

36. Maghâzi of Mu’tamir ibn Sulaiman (d. 187)

37. Musannaf of Waki’ ibn Jarrah (d. 196)

38. Musannaf of ‘Abdur-Razzâq ibn Hammam (136-221)

39. Musnad of Zaid ibn ‘Ali (76-122)

40. Books of Imâm Shâfi’i (150-204)

The following books written in this
age are still available in printed form:

1. Al-Muwatta by Imâm Mâlik.

2. Kitâb-ul-Âthâr by Imâm Abu Hanîfah.

3. Musannaf by ‘Abdur-Razzâq. This book has been published in eleven big
volumes.

4. As-Sîrah by Muhammad ibn Ishaq.

5. Kitâb az-Zuhd by ‘Abdullâh ibn al-Mubârak.

6. Kitâb az-Zuhd by Waki’ ibn Jarrâh (3 volumes).

7. Al-Musnad by Zaid ibn ‘Ali (76-122).

8. Sunan of Imâm Shâfi’i.

9. Musnad of Shâfi’i.

10. Siyar of Awzâ’i (88-157).

11. Musnad of ‘Abdullâh ibn al-Mubârak.

12. Musnad of Abu Dâwûd Tayalisi (d. 204).

13. Ar-Radd ‘ala Siyaril-Awzâ’i by Imâm Abu Yûsuf.

14. Al-Hujjah ‘ala Ahlil-Madînah by Imâm Muhammad ibn Hasan Shaibâni.

15. Kitâbul-Umm by Imâm Shâfi’i.

16. Al-Maghâzi by Waqidi (130-206) (4 volumes).

This list is by no means exhaustive. But a careful study of these books only
which are available today in printed forms would clearly reveal that their style
is much developed and they definitely do not seem to be the first books on their
subject. Some of them are in more than ten volumes, and their arrangement shows
that the compilation of hadîth in those days reached a developed stage.

All these valuable efforts of compiling the ahâdîth belong to the first and
second centuries. Hence, one can easily see how false is the assumption that the
compilation of ahâdîth did not take place before the third century.

What we have cited above is more than sufficient to prove that the compilation
of ahâdîth had begun in the very days of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) and has continued in each point of time thereafter. This process has,
no doubt, passed through certain stages as is usual in every new science or
branch of knowledge. But the assumption that the process did not begin before
the third century cannot by substantiated on any ground whatsoever.

The Criticism of
Ahâdîth

Although the task of preserving the ahâdîth through all the four ways mentioned
earlier, including compilations in written form has been performed with due
diligence throughout the first four centuries of Islamic history, yet it does
not mean that all the traditions narrated or compiled in this period have been
held as true and reliable.

In fact, in the same period in which the work of the compilation of ahâdîth was
going on, a very systematic science of criticism was developed by the scholars
of hadîth in which numerous tests were suggested to verify the correctness of a
narration. All these tests were applied to each and every tradition or report
before holding it reliable. The different branches of knowledge which have been
introduced by the scholars of the science of hadîth has no parallel in the art
of historical criticism throughout world history. It is not possible for us to
herein present even a brief introduction of these different branches and the
valuable works produced in this respect. It may be said without any fear of
exaggeration that thousands of books have been written on these different
branches of knowledge regarding the science of hadîth.

It will be pertinent, however, to give a brief example of the nature of the
criticism of ahâdîth carried on by scholars and the different tests applied by
them to ascertain the veracity of a hadîth.

The traditions viewed from different angles have been classified into hundreds
of kinds. Relative to their standards of authenticity, the traditions are
ultimately classified into four major categories:

(a) Sahîh (sound)

(b) Hasan (good)

(c) Da’îf (weak)

(d) Maudû’ (fabricated)

Only the first two kinds are held to be reliable. Precepts of the Shari’ah can
be based on and inferred from only these two kinds. Hence, only the ahâdîth of
these two categories are held to be the source of Islamic law. The other two
kinds have little or no value especially in legal or doctrinal matters.

Before declaring a hadîth as sahîh or hasan, the following tests are applied:

(a) Scrutiny of its narrators.

(b) Scrutiny of the constancy of the chain of narrators.

(c) Comparison of its chain and text with other available paths of narration in
the same manner.

(d) Examination of the chain and the text of the hadîth in the light of other
material available on the subject, and to ensure that there is no defect in the
chain or in the text.

We will try to give a brief explanation of these four tests as they are applied
by the scholars of hadîth to scrutinize the veracity of a tradition.

1. Scrutiny of the narrators

The first and foremost test of the correctness of a hadîth relates to the
credibility of its narrators. This scrutiny is carried out on two scores:
firstly, examination of the integrity and honesty of a narrator, and secondly,
examination of his memory power.

To carry out this scrutiny, a separate complete Science has been introduced
which is called ‘Ilm-ur-Rijâl (the knowledge of men). The scholars of this
science devoted their lives for the thorough enquiry about each person who has
reported a hadîth. For this, they used to go to his place and enquire about him
from his neighbors, pupils, and friends so that no scholar would be impressed by
his personal relations with a narrator. ‘Ali ibn al-Madini, the famous scholar
of Rijâl, when asked about his father, first tried to avoid the question and
replied, “Ask some other scholar about him.” But when the question was repeated
with a request for his own opinion, he said:

It is the matter of Faith, (I, therefore, reply) he is a weak narrator.

Waki’ ibn Jarrâh, the well-known Imâm of hadîth, held his
father as “weak” in hadîth, and did not rely on his reports unless they are
confirmed by some reliable narrator.

Imâm Abu Dâwûd, the author of one of the Six Books, has
opined about his son ‘Abdullâh (this is the same ‘Abdullâh whose work,
Kitâb-ul-Masalif, has been published by some orientalists), that he was “a great
liar.”

Zaid ibn Abi Unaisah has said about his brother Yahya, “Do
not accept the traditions of my brother Yahya, because he is reputed in lying.”

Similar opinions are recorded in the books of the ‘Ilm-ur-Rijâl. Hundreds of
books have been written on this subject. Here are only a few examples:

Tahdhîb at-Tahdhîb by Hâfiz Ibn Hajar: Printed in twelve
volumes, this book has been designed to give a brief account of all the
narrators whose narration is found in the famous Six Books of hadîth only. It
contains the life accounts of 12,455 narrators, arranged in alphabetical order.
(This is the total of the members given in each volume separately. Sometimes,
the same narrator has been mentioned in different places with different names.
So, the actual number of the narrators may be less, but not less than 10,000.)

You can pick up any name from any chain of any hadîth in any book from the Six
Books. This name will certainly be found in the Tahdhîb at-Tahdhîb recorded in
its place in alphabetical scheme. There you can find his dates of birth and
death, the list of his teachers, the list of his pupils, important events of his
life, and the opinions of the scholars about his credibility.

There are several other books meant for the narrators of the Six Books
exclusively, and after consulting them one can easily reach a definite
conclusion about the veracity of a narrator.

Lisân al-Mîzân by Hâfiz Ibn Hajar: This book is meant
exclusively for those narrators whose names do not appear in any chain contained
in any of the Six Books. It means that the traditions reported by them are found
only in some books other than the Six Books.

This book consists of seven volumes and embodies the introduction of 5,991
narrators.

Ta’jîl al-Manfa’ah by Hâfiz Ibn Hajar: This book is
confined to the introductions of the narrators whose traditions are found in the
books of the four Imâms: Mâlik, Abu Hanîfah, Shâfi’i, and Ahmad ibn Hanbal, and
are not among the narrators of the Six Books. Thus, it contains the introduction
of 1,732 narrators.

All these three books are written and compiled by the same person, namely, Hâfiz
Ibn Hajar. It means that he has compiled the introduction of more than seventeen
thousand narrators of hadîth.

This is the effort of only a single scholar. Many other books are available on
the same subject. The following table will show the large number of narrators
introduced in a few famous books of Rijâl which are frequently referred to:

Name of the book

Author

Volumes

Number of narrators

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

At-Târîkh al-Kabîr

Al-Jarh wat-Ta’dîl

Tahdhîb
at-Tahdhîb

Mizân al-I’tidâl

Lisân al-Mîzân

As-Siqat

Al-Mughni fid-Du’afâ

Imâm Bukhâri

Ibn Abi Hatim

Hâfiz Ibn Hajar

Dhahabi

Hâfiz Ibn Hajar

‘Ijli

Dhahabi

9

9

12

4

7

1

2

13,781

18,050

12,455

11,053

2,116

7,854

The last book of this table has introduced only those narrators who have been
held as “weak” narrators. Similar books are written by Ibn Abi Hatim, Dâraqutni,
etc. On the contrary, there are books which deal with the reliable narrators
only, like Thiqât of Ibn Hibbân in eleven volumes.

Anyhow, if a narrator is found to be dishonest, has very weak memory or he is
unknown, no trust is placed on his narrations. A large number of traditions has
been repudiated on this score alone.

2. Constancy of the chain of narrators
It is well-known that no report, in the science of hadîth, is accepted unless it
gives the full chain of narrators upto the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam). Each narrator from this chain is first scrutinized on the
touch-stone of his credibility as discussed above. But even if all the narrators
of a chain are found to be reliable, it is not enough to hold the tradition as
authentic. It must be proved that the chain is constant and no narrator has been
missed in between. If it is found that some narrator has been missed at any
stage, the tradition is held to be unreliable. To ensure the constancy of the
chain, it is necessary to know about each narrator whether it is possible for
him historically to meet the person from whom he claims to hear the tradition.

This scrutiny is indeed very difficult and delicate. But the scholars of the
science of hadîth have undertaken this task in such an accurate manner that one
cannot but wonder.

While holding an enquiry about each narrator, the scholars, besides ascertaining
his integrity and memory, would also survey his teachers and pupils. Thus, a
detailed list of both his teachers and pupils is available in each detailed book
of Rijâl. So, when deciding about the constancy of a hadîth the scholars do not
only make themselves sure about the dates of birth and death of each narrator,
but also examine the list of his teachers and pupils.

Not only this, they often try to fix the time-span in which a narrator had
opportunities to meet a particular teacher and that in which he did actually
hear ahâdîth from him. On the basis of this information they derive certain
important conclusions about the credibility of a narrator.

For example, ‘Abdullâh ibn Lahi’ah is a well-known Egyptian narrator of hadîth.
It is established that his memory was weak and he used to narrate those
traditions which he wrote. At a particular time, his house was burnt by fire and
all his books were also burnt. After this occurrence he sometimes used to report
ahâdîth from his memory. Therefore, some scholars have decided that his
narrations before the accident are reliable while those narrated after it are
not worthy of trust. Now, the pupils who have heard ahâdîth from him in the
early period, their narrations may be accepted, while the reports of those who
have heard from him in the later period cannot be relied upon. The scholars have
scrutinized the list of his pupils and have specified the names of his early
pupils, like ‘Abdullâh ibn Wahb, etc. and have declared that all the rest should
be treated as his later pupils, and no trust might be placed on their
narrations.

In short, the second type of scrutiny, which is very essential in the criticism
of traditions, relates to the constancy and perpetuity of the chain of
narrators. If it is found that a narrator has not heard the hadîth directly from
the one to whom he is ascribing it, the tradition is said to be Munqati’
(broken) which cannot be treated as reliable.

3. Comparison with other narrations: The third test applied
to a tradition relates to its comparison with what is narrated by other pupils
of the same teacher.
Sometimes a tradition is reported by several narrators. All these reports about
the same saying or event are said to be the turuq (different paths) of that
tradition. While scrutinizing a tradition, the scholars undertake a combined
study of all its “paths.” If it is found that the majority of the reliable
reporters narrate the hadîth in a particular way, but one of them reports it in
a version substantially different from that of the others, his report is held to
be a shâdh (rare) version. In such case, despite the reliability of the
reporter, his version is not accepted as a sahîh (sound) one, and no trust is
placed on it unless it is confirmed and supported by any internal or external
evidence.

4. General analysis of the tradition:

The last, and very important, scrutiny is
accompanied by the general analysis of a tradition. In this scrutiny the
tradition is analyzed in the light of other relevant material available on the
subject. The tradition is examined from different angles: whether the reported
saying or event is at all possible; whether the reported event conforms to the
established historical events; whether its text can be held as truly attributed
to the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam); whether the chain of
narrators is genuine, etc.

This is a very difficult and delicate scrutiny which cannot be undertaken
successfully unless the scholar has full command over all the relevant subjects,
occupies complete knowledge of hadîth, and has a great skill in the science of
criticism of hadîth.

If, after this scrutiny, a strong doubt appears to a scholar about the
authenticity of a hadîth, he points out that there is a “defect” (‘ilal) in the
chain or in the text of the hadîth, and a tradition having this kind of ‘illah
or defect is not held as sahîh.

Thus, a sahîh (sound) hadîth has been defined by the scholars as follows:

“What is reported, by a reporter who is honest and of good memory power, without
any break in the chain of narrators, without any shudhûdh (rareness) and without
any ‘illah (defect).”

Conclusion

It is not possible for us to give all the details of the critical sciences
developed by the scholars of hadîth. What we have stated in this chapter is only
a simple example of the works undertaken by them. It can, however, help one to
imagine the altitude of their academic and scientific efforts and to satisfy
oneself that the task of “preservation of hadîth” has been performed by this
ummah with such diligence, precaution, and sense of responsibility that one
cannot find its parallel in the history of any other community. It was through
these efforts that the divine promise of the preservation of the Holy Qur’ân,
with all its letters and meanings, was duly fulfilled.