Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:

Password

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:

Confirm Password:

Email Address

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:

OR

Log-in

User Name

Password

Remember Me?

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Additional Options

Miscellaneous Options

Automatically parse links in text

Automatically embed media (requires automatic parsing of links in text to be on).

Automatically retrieve titles from external links

Topic Review (Newest First)

01-15-2013 01:10 PM

skip11

I haven't tried C3 yet but I don't really like NS' version when I demoed the Evo. I rode the T.Rice for 2 seasons before I got the YES the other day.

01-15-2013 12:44 PM

Sick-Pow

I think the Never SUmmer and Flying V and C3 are better versions of rocker and camber IMO.

01-15-2013 12:43 PM

Wiredsport

Hi,

The sub-message of this thread is that the tech that is described in the literature is not always what shows up in the board...

01-15-2013 12:40 PM

skip11

bumpity bump

01-14-2013 07:27 PM

skip11

Yeah, but it's supposed to have a freeride camrock which you can see here Nidecker Snowboards - Technology Camber. The diagram is totally different that what you get. So I'm just wondering if it's supposed to be like the diagram or since they moved the production to Elan, the camrock changes a bit as well.

I just got mine, it seems that mine has more camber and goes pass the inserts more? It's a 156, maybe it's my table, but if I lay it on the floor you can see the minor rocker up front. It rises up a bit more when you load the camber.

That is what I had seen as well. Pretty much classic Rocker Camber Rocker (which is a very fun design).

01-14-2013 06:24 PM

skip11

@arsenalfan: could you post another pic of the camber profile (side view), from the front binding up to the nose?

01-14-2013 06:19 PM

skip11

Can anyone else confirm this?

01-14-2013 04:54 PM

skip11

I just got mine, it seems that mine has more camber and goes pass the inserts more? It's a 156, maybe it's my table, but if I lay it on the floor you can see the minor rocker up front. It rises up a bit more when you load the camber.

I had a Signal Omni that had almost the same profile. The board was a blast to ride. The camber really lets you ride it anywhere and feel comfortable doing it. The rocker is nice for when you're just slow cruising and messing around. It really makes the board feel more "lively" at slow speeds since you can engage the rocker to make butters and presses a breeze. Have fun riding it man, I'm sure you'll love it!

This thread has more than 10 replies.
Click here to review the whole thread.