"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Full Story

<quoted text>You are such an idiot.The states cannot pass any laws that conflict with the US Constitution or they can be stricken down. DUHDo you have any clue as to the functioning of the Supreme Court??That's the court that declared Obamacare Constitutionally acceptable, and declared Jim Crow Laws unConstitutional.(1954)This is just another version of Jim Crow.Your comprehension of the Constitution is a mile wide and an inch deep. In other words, stick to truck driving for Airborne Express.

The Federal Government cannot pass any law that conflict with the Constitution or it can be struck down. They can pass any law they want and enforce it until the Federal or even the State Courts(for state laws) say it is UN-Constitutional.This is like telling someone they cannot speed even though their car goes 140MPH "Ya Right" So in essence any stupid law can be passes, sad but true.

<quoted text>Nice try, old fool.If Obama's +8 is mediocre, that makes Bush's +3 just what?? LOL2012 Dem gains were due to GOP candidates like Todd Akin and Richard Mourdoch, fascists who attacked women's rights and were rejected.Coattails?? You're so FOS it's laughable.Repugnants self destructed and were rejected, from the Magic 47% Mormon right down the line.For you to say otherwise shows how delusional you are.

Since the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008, we have been less rich, and our stupidity ought in theory to be less affordable. Instead, it’s been supersized.

To take only the most obvious example, President Obama has added six-and-a-half trillion bucks to the national debt, and has nothing to show for it.

As Churchill would say, had his bust not been bounced from the Oval Office, never in the field of human spending has so much been owed by so many for so little.

Meanwhile, the ranks of Obamacare victims grows as insurance companies like Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield send letters to say,“To meet the requirements of the new laws, your current plan can no longer be continued beyond your 2014 renewal date.”

Beyond the president’s characteristically breezy lie that “if you like your health-care plan, you will be able to keep your health-care plan” is the sheer nuttiness of what’s happening.

For years, Europeans and “progressive” Americans have raged at the immorality of the U.S. medical system: All those millions with no health coverage! But so many are now being dropped and have no insurance because of what Obama calls “universal health care”.

The CBO’s most recent calculations estimate that in 2023, a decade after the implementation of Obamacare, there will still be over 30 million people uninsured — or about the population of Canada. That doesn’t sound terribly “universal,” and I would bet it’s something of a low-ball figure: As many employers are discovering, one of the simplest ways “to meet the requirements of the new laws” and still stay just about solvent is to shift your workers from family plans to individual plans, and tell their spouses and children to go look elsewhere.

Does Obamacare achieve its other goal of “containing costs,” already higher than anywhere else?

No. Avik Roy reports in Forbes that Obamacare will increase individual-market premiums by 62 percent for women, 99 percent for men. In America,“insuring” against disaster now costs more than you’d pay in most countries for disaster.

No one has ever before attempted to devise a uniform health system for 300 million people — for the very good reason that it probably can’t be done.

Britain’s National Health Service serves a population less than a fifth the size of America’s and is the third-largest employer on the planet after the Indian National Railways and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, the last of which is now largely funded by American taxpayers through interest payment on federal debt.

A single-payer U.S. system would be bigger than Britain’s NHS, India’s railways, and China’s army combined, at least in its bureaucracy.

So, as in banking and housing and college tuition and so many other areas of endeavor, Washington is engaging in a kind of under-the-counter nationalization, in which the husk of a nominally private industry is conscripted to enforce government rules — and ruthlessly so, as many others are discovering.

<quoted text>Son, I know you're a right wing nut and have problems with facts and comprehension so let me see if I can clarify this down to your level....... it was YOUR version of history in question.So please don't "pass the buck to duck" the issue.

Apparently rightwingers only care about the Constitution when it suits them.

<quoted text>I realize you have a tough time comprehending things, I was talking also talking about voting 'requirements', guess everything needs to be spelled out to you morons. States just can't disregard the Constitution and do whatever the fck they want, why have a Constitution then?

Okay, I'm going to type this real s l o w. The voting requirements in the constitution is in S e c t i o n 4. It says the m a n n e r of the elections is up to the states.

<quoted text>Flack's argument was that state legislators can take away the right to a popular vote. It had nothing to do with the electoral college. But nice try, Weakheart.Who was the only President to be elected by electors only??

<quoted text>I realize you have a tough time comprehending things, I was talking also talking about voting 'requirements', guess everything needs to be spelled out to you morons. States just can't disregard the Constitution and do whatever the fck they want, why have a Constitution then?

Obama’s pointless, traceless super-spending is now (as they used to say after 9/11)“the new normal.” Nancy Pelosi assured the nation last weekend that everything that can be cut has been cut and there are no more cuts to be made. And the disturbing thing is that, as a matter of practical politics, she may well be right.

If you have old money well managed, you can afford to be stupid — or afford the government’s stupidity on your behalf.

If you’re a social-activist celebrity getting $20 million per movie, you can afford the government’s stupidity.

If you’re a tenured professor or a unionized bureaucrat whose benefits were chiseled in stone two generations ago, you can afford it.

If you’ve got a wind farm and you’re living large on government “green energy” investments, you can afford it.

If you’ve got the contract for signing up Obamaphone recipients, you can afford it.

But out there beyond the islands of privilege most Americans don’t have the same comfortably padded margin for error, and they’re hunkering down.

Talk about racism in the Latin community because they feel the same way about Blacks that they try to say is only Whites that feels this way where is al sharpton and obama you have daughters who look like this little say something obama the phony Little Miss Hispanic Stripped of Title Because She’s Not Latin Enough Delaware’s 7-year-old Little Miss Hispanic is devastated that she was stripped of her title because she’s not Hispanic enough.

After winning the Miss Chiquita Delaware pageant on August, 31, Jakiyah McCoy graced the cover of a Spanish language newspaper. That’s when questions and doubts were raised among readers in the Latin community.

El Tiempo Hispano newspaper reports that president of Nuestras Raíces (Our Roots) Delaware Maria Perez denies the allegations that Jakiyah was stripped of her title for being black.

Perez said the family couldn’t prove the minimum requirement of 25% Latin roots.

I thought Obama/Liberals told us the American People loves Obamacare…Most Popular Question at Healthcare.gov :'How do I get exemption?'

That's because MOST people don't need Obamacare you dumbass. Its for the 30 million uncovered and those people that the insurance companies have thrown under the bus.Obamacare is really exposing the ignorance of you right wing morons.

<quoted text>You are such an idiot.The states cannot pass any laws that conflict with the US Constitution or they can be stricken down. DUHDo you have any clue as to the functioning of the Supreme Court??That's the court that declared Obamacare Constitutionally acceptable, and declared Jim Crow Laws unConstitutional.(1954)This is just another version of Jim Crow.Your comprehension of the Constitution is a mile wide and an inch deep. In other words, stick to truck driving for Airborne Express.

I forgot to mention a Voter ID is not illegal if it does not cost the Voter money. Illinois does not have voter Id’s and we have people who Vote 2 and 3x in Chicago. Their place of Residence is the sixth bench on the south side of the park. This is a legal residence for voting. Then they are paid for the vote with Alcohol (The Cause of and Solation to all of man’s problem ”Homer”)

<quoted text>I'm sorry but I reviewed the revenue generation aspects of the ACA nowhere does it cite growing money on trees.Oh wait, you must be talking about those same trees rat Republicans used to wage two wars, expand Medicare with a drug program, and set record earmarks. Those trees?

Are you referring to WW2 and the Vietnam War that the Dumbocrats placed on a credit card? If you think Medicare was in trouble why did the Dumbocrats take $ 716 billion from it to fund Obamacare?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.