On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 04:10:48PM -0500, Stephen Ryan wrote:
> However, since GNU has never been an actual releasable operating system
> in any sense of the word, that kind of complaining about credit mostly
> just sounds like sour grapes.
Linux without GNU has never been an actual releasable operating
system either. Linux without GNU isn't even an actual operating system
(aside from a few not much used corncer cases), GNU without Linux
is. So why name it Linux and not GNU? I don't think your reasoning is
really right.
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.orghttp://www.gnu.org
IRC: jeroen@openprojects