Homosexual activists complain that
Romania does not want to allow homosexual “marriage.” They whine that while the
European Union has been making rapid steps to change the definition of family
in its laws, Romania is taking steps to protect the traditional family from
predatory homosexuality.

In an intrusive attempt to help
predatory homosexuality, several embassies expressed in a joint statement
solidarity and support for LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and
intersex) activists of Romania, in the context of the International Day Against
Homophobia in May 17.

Homosexual
activism has minimal support in Romania. So other nations have decided to give
a helping hand to Romanian homosexual groups. For example, last year’s Romanian
Gay Pride drew 2,500 people, including foreign diplomats.

Homosexual
activism in Romania is essentially an imported product. The main homosexualist
group, MozaiQ, was founded in 2012 by a Romanian who, while studying at State
University in California, married a homosexual, and later returned to Romania
to demand legal homosexual “marriage.”

Romanians have the lowest rate of
approval for this kind of “marriage” in the whole of the European Union.

Romania is also among the last
countries in the European Union not to accept any form of civil
union between people of the same sex.

What
accounts for such staunch pro-family stance is Christianity. With a population
of almost 20 million, according to the last census, 87% Romanians declare
themselves Orthodox Christians.

Considering that Romanians
overwhelmingly reject homosexual “marriage” and other items of the predatory
homosexual activism, why are the U.S., European Union, Brazil, Argentina, Chile and
Israel helping Romanian homosexual groups to pressure the Romanian government
to embrace such activism?

Dr.
Peter Costea, a U.S. citizen born and raised in Romania, is asking the right
questions about pro-homosexuality foreign pressures on Romania.

He knows what he is talking about:
He is an attorney who has worked for 27 years representing an increasing number
of individuals victimized by abusive policies of foreign states and
governments.

Addressing
the Argentinian ambassador through official letter, he said,

You signed, along with ambassadors from a
host of countries, a Declaration in support of the pride parade which took
place in Bucharest on May 20, 2017. In doing so, you and the Republic of
Argentina have offended 25 million Romanians worldwide, primarily in Romania,
the Republic of Moldova, Western Europe, and North America. I am one of the
persons you offended.

He added,

This sort of repugnant international
behavior has now become an annual ritual, where clusters of countries from
around the world sign declarations accusing, more or less directly, the people
of Romania of homophobia and transphobia.

I
join Costea in the protest. But it is not only Argentina under Mauricio Macri
that is helping homosexual groups in Romania. Brazil, my nation, too. I had
hoped that with the defeat of the administration of socialist Dilma Rousseff
last year, the new Brazilian administration would stop homosexual activism in
its foreign policy. My hope was dashed.

I also hoped that with the new
administration under Trump the U.S. government would stop its abusive behavior,
under the administration of socialist Obama, of using its embassies to meddle
in other nations’ affairs to promote the homosexual activism.

In
my book “O Movimento Homossexual” (The Homosexual Movement), published
originally by the Brazilian branch of Bethany House Publishers in 1998, I
denounced the Brazilian homosexual movement, which was dependent on the influence
from the U.S. homosexual movement. I exposed the U.S. homosexual reality and I
speculated that Brazil would copy the U.S. homosexual trends in laws, schools,
media, churches, etc. in a few years. Eventually, Brazil actually copied them.

I
denounced especially the Bill Clinton administration and its pro-sodomy
policies.

And
since 2009 I have worked hard to denounce how the Obama administration was
promoting the homosexual activism. I had to denounce, because Obama’s
pro-homosexuality policies affected directly Brazil and other nations.

Even though Trump is different from
Obama, I am aware that he has no conservative history. But he is a businessman
who cares about people utilizing his services. In this case, I hoped that he
cared about evangelicals, who were his main voting bloc. Trump needed
evangelicals, and they helped him. Now evangelicals need Trump to stop
homosexual activism in the U.S. foreign policy.

And if Trump has a moral “contract”
with evangelicals, the U.S. Embassy in Romania should never meddle in Romania’s
affairs against the moral and Christian values of its people in support of the
homosexual sin or any other sin.

The
U.S. foreign policy is meddling in other nations’ affairs in support of sodomy
(sex between men) and Trump is silent about these nasty actions of his own
administration, in spite of the fact that he has been informed about these
actions and in spite of the fact that he has all the authority to halt them.

The
Bible shows that sodomy destroys societies. Trump has not initiated the
sodomization of the U.S. society. But he can work to stop it. He has not
initiated the sodomization of other nations through the U.S. foreign policy.
But he can stop it.

After
all, can a nation with a contract with God since its birth keep a contract with
sodomy? Conservative evangelicals, who elected Trump, can help him save America
from the ravages of sodomy.

Continuing, Peter Costea said to
the Argentinian ambassador (a reprimand which I apply to the Brazilian and
American ambassadors too):

First, it is not your role as Ambassador to
pass judgment on the feelings citizens of other countries have with respect to
various issues… By officially throwing your weight and the weight of your
country behind the Declaration, you implicitly condemned those who dare express
a different view on a highly moral and controversial issue. Just like you, I
have also been trained in diplomacy, and one of the fundamental principles we
learned in diplomacy school was to respect the feelings of the citizens of the
countries in which diplomats are posted and not to offend them.

The role of an Ambassador is to connect states
qua states, and communicate matters of mutual concern between them. It is not
to lecture the people of a foreign nation in matters of morality and on which
rational people differ. It is not to arrogantly convey a position of
superiority, by implying that, in this case, you or Argentina stand on higher
moral ground, possess such a stellar record on human rights and have never
fallen short of your own commitments to human rights, that you have attained
the moral position to lecture the people of Romania. Mr. Ambassador, this is
highly inappropriate and offensive.

Second, I doubt that in signing the
Declaration you expressed the true feelings of your nation on the matter. I
doubt you had their approval or consent to sign the Declaration…

Third, I strongly suspect that you signed
the Declaration to curry favor with the European Union on behalf of your
Government. If so, your action was insincere and motivated by political
expediency not conviction. In which case it was hypocritical. It may be that in
signing the Declaration you scored points with the European Union, but you
scored no points or good will with the people of Romania. Please understand
that they, too, have dignity, constitute a sovereign state, a sovereign nation,
and the rules of diplomacy do not allow you to subvert their dignity or
sovereignty.

Fourth, Argentina is not in a position to
lecture Romania or the rest of the world in matters of human rights and
tolerance. Please look into your own country’s past and present and spot your
own human rights deficiencies. Argentina nearly exterminated all of its native
population toward the end of the XIX Century, and today your country
discriminates against Evangelicals.

Borrowing
from Costea’s language, I say: I strongly suspect that Brazil, Argentina, Chile
and Israel signed the Declaration in support of homosexual activism in Romania
to curry favor with the European Union and the United States on behalf of their
governments.

Their
signature was motivated by political expediency and by the politically-correct
conviction that the homosexual behavior is above the well-being of families and
their children.

The
U.S., European Union, Brazil, Argentina, Chile and Israel should be ashamed to
help homosexual groups impose predatory homosexual activism in Romania. This is
not democracy.

This is international diplomacy at
the service of homosexual tyranny.

With information from Agerpres,
BalkanInsight, Raluca Ciocian Ardeleanu and Peter Costea’s letter to the
Argentinian Ambassador.

Sunday, August 06, 2017

Constituent Sues GOP,
Accusing the Party of Fraud

By Julio
Severo

A
retired attorney in Virginia Beach is so incensed that Republicans couldn’t
repeal the Obama’s Affordable Care Act that he’s suing to get political
donations back, accusing the GOP of fraud and racketeering.

Bob
Heghmann, 70, filed a lawsuit Thursday in U.S. District Court, saying the
national and Virginia Republican parties and some GOP leaders raised millions
of dollars in campaign funds while knowing they weren’t going to be able to
overturn Obama’s socialist law also known as Obamacare.

The
GOP “has been engaged in a pattern of Racketeering which involves massive fraud
perpetrated on Republican voters and contributors as well as some Independents
and Democrats,” the suit said. Racketeering, perhaps better known for use in
prosecuting organized crime, involves a pattern of illegal behavior by a
specific group.

National
GOP committee member Morton Blackwell said the suit is a “sign of conservative
anger that the Republican-controlled Congress has not yet repealed and replaced
Obamacare.”

He
argued that “progressives” had taken over the Democratic Party and seemed to
lament that “conservatives” had not yet taken over the Republican Party.

At
last, a Republican leader recognizes that the Republican Party is not
controlled by conservatives and it is not behaving as a conservative party.

“Too
few conservatives are willing to invest their time, talent, and money and
personally participate inside the Republican Party,” Blackwell said. “A
Republican majority will mean a conservative majority if and when a sufficient
number of conservatives figure out why the success of their principles depends
on their personal involvement in local, state and national Republican Party
committees and in party nomination contests.”

Heghmann’s
suit argues that the national GOP raised more than $735 million and Virginia’s
party more than $20 million from 2009 to 2016 in large part by promising to
repeal the Affordable Care Act.

Heghmann
said he has standing to sue the GOP because has been a contributor.

Heghmann’s
suit states: “Now that the Republican Party has won the House, the Senate and
the Presidency the effort it is making to Repeal and Replace Obamacare is
itself a Fraud upon Republican Voters and Donors.”

The “pattern of racketeering”
extended to the party’s response to Trump’s candidacy, his suit states. The GOP
units raised money to push Obamacare repeal or Trump’s promises but “never
intended to implement the Trump Agenda or fulfill the promises of the
Republican Platform.”

Heghmann has given an excellent
example, especially by clarifying that the GOP should be sued for not fulfilling
the Trump Agenda or the promises of the Republican Platform.

The
Trump Agenda was clearly anti-neocon, but the same GOP unwilling to defeat the
socialist Obamacare is unwilling to implement anti-neocon measures.

Patrick
J. Buchanan, a former adviser to Ronald Reagan, said,
“The GOP Platform committee rejected a plank to pull the U.S. deeper into
Ukraine, by successfully opposing new U.S. arms transfers to Kiev. Improved
relations with Russia were what candidate Trump had promised, and what
Americans would vote for in November.”

Under
neocon pressure, the Trump administration has appointed Kurt Volker, a neocon
who was the director of the McCain Institute, to head the Trump policy on
Ukraine, guaranteeing the fulfillment of the neocon ambitions against Russia.
Volker wants U.S. arms transfers to Kiev.

All
of this is a clear sign the Republican Party is not behaving as a conservative
party and that conservatives do not control the GOP.

Neocons
did not help elect Trump. On the contrary, they opposed him. John McCain was
the main neocon opposition to Trump.

So
evangelicals should sue the GOP for capitulating to McCain and his neocons. They
should sue the GOP for forcing Trump to follow the neocon agenda.

Neocons are engaged in
blood-shedding of Christians in other nations. They should be stopped. Trump
wanted to do it, but the pressure was too strong. Where are evangelicals and
their holy voice and pressure?

Pressure
works. When vice president Mike Pence was the Indiana governor, he approved the
Religious Freedom Restoration Act to protect religious people from persecution
by homosexual activists. But after widespread pressure and boycotts, including
from big businesses such as Apple and Wal-Mart, Pence
rolled back his religious freedom law. His cowardly changes marked
the largest step toward special homosexual rights there in history, according
to pro-family activists who studied the language of the changed law.

Today,
according to Buchanan, Pence is a neocon who fully approves U.S. military
meddling in Ukraine. But by doing it he is violating the original Trump agenda
and GOP Platform.

Evangelical
leaders, churches and organizations should sue Pence, or the GOP.

Volker,
McCain and other neocons should be butted out from the Trump administration.

Recently,
socialist Democrats and “conservative” Republicans, spurred by McCain, joined
forces to impose more sanctions on Russia, which is a more conservative and
Christian nation today. But they do not join forces to impose sanctions on the
Islamic Saudis, who were responsible for the 9/11.

Daily
Mail said Trump
“signed the [sanctions] bill, which he wasn’t happy about, in private.” Trump
is being forced to do the neocons’ will. Why do not U.S. evangelical leaders,
churches and organizations resist and sue neocons? It is time to confront
neocons in the Democratic Party and in the Republican Party.

Daily
Mail also said that the sanctions bill contains provisions that “prevent the
president from lifting [the sanctions] without approval from Congress —
provisions that got drafted amid concerns Trump would lift or limit sanctions
amid his frequent praise for Russian President Vladimir Putin and desire to
improve ties between the two powers.”

The neocons in the Congress have tied
Trump’s hands. Evangelical leaders, churches and organizations should helping
Trump by suing the GOP for capitulating to the will of the neocons, Democrats
and socialists and for forcing Trump to do the neocons’ will.

If
McCain and his neocon hordes wanted to implement a neocon agenda in the U.S.
government, especially affecting negatively Christians in other nations, he
should have defeated Obama in 2008. He failed. He is not the president. And
Pence should behave as Trump’s vice president, not as if he were McCain’s vice
president.

If
evangelicals wanted a neocon in the White House, they would have voted for
McCain, not Trump. They chose Trump for his clearly anti-neocon speech.

Trump’s hands are tied by a
Congress controlled by warmongering socialist Democrats and warmongering
“conservative” Republicans who have capitulated to the neocons. What will evangelicals
do to untie Trump?

It is time for evangelical leaders,
churches and organizations to sue the GOP for the implementation of the
original anti-neocon Trump Agenda.

U.S.
evangelicals should also sue the GOP for the genocide of Christians in Syria
and Iraq in the trail of U.S. interventions and invasions. Even Trump condemned
the Bush invasion of Iraq.

It is time also for Christians
around the world to pray that God may neutralize the neocons and their
malevolent power in the U.S. government and in the U.S. military industrial
complex.

Tuesday, August 01, 2017

Saudi Arabia, which Threatens War
over the Internationalization of Its Islamic Holy Sites, Wants the
Internationalization of Jerusalem and Other Israeli Holy Sites

By Julio Severo

Saudi foreign minister called what
he said
was Qatar’s demand for an internationalization of the Muslim hajj pilgrimage a
declaration of war against Saudi Arabia, as reported by Reuters.

“Qatar’s demands to
internationalize the holy sites is aggressive and a declaration of war against
the kingdom [of Saudi Arabia],” said the minister.

“We reserve the right to respond to
anyone who is working on the internationalization of the holy sites,” he said.

I understand the Saudi feelings.
Jesus said about these feelings:

“So
whatever you wish that others would do to you, do also to them.” (Matthew 7:12
ESV)

So
if Saudi Arabia does not want the internationalization of its own Islamic holy
sites, why does it want the internationalization of Jerusalem and other Israeli
holy sites?

For years Saudi Arabia, Turkey, the
Vatican and the United States have,
according to WND, worked on a plan for the
internationalization of Jerusalem and other Israeli holy sites. And Israel,
pacifically, has declared no war on the intrusive planners.

What
protects Saudi holy sites from internationalization is the “holy” Islamic
wrath, which is very manifest in the many radical Islamic groups, including
ISIS, supported by Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabia, Turkey, the Vatican
and the United States have no right whatsoever to decide anything about
Jerusalem and other Israeli holy sites, because these sites belong exclusively
to God and he has already given them to one people: the Jews.

Even so, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, the
Vatican and the United States have, through their intrusive decisions, hindered
Israel from having what is rightfully its.

Why do not Turkey, the Vatican and
the United States hinder Saudi Arabia from having its holy places?

Some could ask: “If God fights for
Israel, why has not he protected Israel from the intrusive decisions of Saudi
Arabia, Turkey, the Vatican and the United States?”

Is Israel prepared to keep Jerusalem?
Today, even under the right-wing administration of Benjamin Netanyahu,
Jerusalem has homosexual parades. No other nation in the Middle East has such
abominable spectacle of depravity. Israel is defying God with one of the most
heinous sins condemned by God.

God did not give Jerusalem to
sodomites. He gave it to the Jews. If the Jews want God to confirm Jerusalem in
their hands, they need to stop celebrating sodomy.

If God did not spare Sodom over the
homosexual sin, how could he tolerate a modern Jerusalem celebrating
homosexuality and abortion? Yes, Israel has one of the most liberal abortion
laws in the world and it is the only nation in the Middle East with such
murderous law.

God wants to fight for Jerusalem to
be exclusively under Jewish ownership, but the Jews are not collaborating.
Their heavy sins are hindering.

The same God who said that
Jerusalem belongs to the Jews also said that homosexuality is an abomination.

The same God who said that
Jerusalem belongs to the Jews also punished, with total destruction, Sodom over
its homosexual sins.

Why should he tolerate a Jerusalem
celebrating the sin that destroyed Sodom?

Even so, Saudi Arabia has no right
to do to Jerusalem and other Israeli holy sites what it does not want other
nations to do to the Saudi Islamic holy places.

Thursday, July 27, 2017

Trump Bans Transgenders in the Military.
Conservatives Rejoicing. But Until When?

By Julio Severo

Franklin Graham, the son of the
famous evangelist Billy Graham, said Wednesday:

“President Donald
J. Trump made a bold move today in announcing that the U.S. military
will not accept transgender individuals to serve. He’s exactly right. And I’m
proud that we have a president who sees and understands the truth. As
Americans, whether you’re a Democrat or a Republican, we should celebrate when
our leaders do the right thing for our country. President Obama’s policy on
this was a mistake. We don’t need people in the military who are confused about
their gender—and the military shouldn’t be aiding in gender ‘transitions.’
President Trump is laser focused on making our military better and stronger.
Pray for him as he faces critics and opposition.”

While Graham is right in his view
of Trump’s statement, top Pentagon leaders declared that they’ll keep allowing
transgender troops to remain in uniform until an authoritative directive orders
them to remove them. After all, a tweet, even a presidential tweet, is not an
order.

“Trump is ambiguous and ambivalent wanting
to tactically please everyone to bribe conservatives and hook them up. He bans
transgenders from serving in the military and on the other hand is preparing to
propagate the same sodomitic agenda. I know the real meaning behind the scene.
That Trump does not want to do marriage a favor, he is just manipulating the
naive ones to recover the support he has lost, and keeping both ways of the
fight content to get ahead. If he achieves to get ahead enough and recover
enough support and worship, he will force sodomy and fecal sex down the throat
of every one of his idolaters.”

It is hard to take Trump seriously,
because his past and present actions are marked by a desire to
please both sides
and also for his famous flip-flops. He sends conflicting signs.

One recent powerful conflicting sign is
that before his presidential tweet, Trump appointed Anthony Scaramucci as his new
White House communications director.

According to pro-family leader Peter
LaBarbera,
Scaramucci has “described himself as ‘pro-choice’ on abortion and a ‘gay
activist’ who has boasted about giving money to the world’s most powerful LGBTQ
lobby, Human Rights Campaign (HRC).”

It is highly inconsistent for a
president who has an abortion and gay activist as his communications director to
want to ban gay activists in the military!

Trump’s decision to ban transgender
troops has faced opposition even within his Republican Party.

John McCain, an anti-Russian Republican
neocon, opposed
Trump’s decision,
but he did not oppose Scaramucci’s appointment. The last time McCain’s will was
done, Ukraine had a revolution, with McCain’s direct participation in anti-Russian
protests in Kiev, and now Ukraine has what it never had before: homosexual
parades.

After his successful revolution in
Ukraine, McCain “visited” (uninvited, which means he invaded) Syria to show
support to Islamic rebels, which with ISIS and al-Qaida seek to overthrow the
Syrian government. If McCain’s will is done, Syria will have what it had never
before: homosexual parades.

As
far as it depends on McCain, the Russian government will be overthrown by the
criminal sanctions Obama had imposed (spurred by McCain and his hordes of
neocons), and it will have what it has banned for 100 years: homosexual
parades.

Next time, it is not known if Trump
will please or not McCain and his lunatic neocon hordes.

Next time, it is not known if Trump
will please or not the lunatic homosexual hordes.

Speaking about McCain and Russia,
yesterday the U.S. Senate, spurred by McCain, passed
new sanctions against Russia,
in a 98-2 vote. Virtually all Republicans (supposedly conservative) and all
Democrats (supposedly socialist) joined forces against Russia.

So
modern America cannot ban what the first U.S. president George Washington
banned (homosexuality), because Democrats are united on behalf of sodomy, and
Republicans are ambivalent. They are unable to join forces to fight sodomy, but
when the subject is Russia, which is now more conservative and has banned
homosexual propaganda to children and teens, both conservative Republicans and
socialist Democrats joyfully join forces to fight Russia!

Sexual confusion is ravaging the
U.S. parties, politicians, media, churches, the military, etc.

Originally, the U.S. military was
created to protect the U.S. borders and national sovereignty.

Today,
the U.S. military is so busy policing the world that it has almost no time to
watch its own borders. Hordes of criminals invade the U.S. because of sheer
military failure.

And the U.S. actions as global
police often make more harm than good. I have a very hard time to remember the
last time the U.S., the largest Protestant nation in the world, helped
Christians in its international military interventions. Bush invaded Iraq and
left a bloody trail of 500,000 massacred Christians. I supported Bush, because he
was pro-life and pro-family. Now, I am very repentant of my support, at least
in the Iraq invasion.

Trump condemned Bush for the Iraq
invasion. In fact, in 2016 candidate Trump also condemned Obama for trying
to attack Syria for an alleged chemical attack. But spurred by McCain, in 2017
President Trump
attacked Syria for an alleged chemical attack… The same bloody foreign-affair soap
opera, with different actors.

With homosexual troops paving the
way for Muslim savages to slaughter thousands of Christians in the Middle East,
it is understandable that 20 veterans a day commit
suicide
nationwide in the United States. Only in 2014, more than 7,400 American veterans
took their own lives.

So
the unnecessary U.S. interventions in other nations have taken a terrible toll
of Christians lives in the Middle East and a toll of lives of U.S. troops too.

And the toll hits also girls and
young women.

In his article “The
Ugly American — Sex Trafficking and Our National Humiliation,” Rev. Albert Mohler said that Rep.
Christopher Smith (R-NJ) declared that “women and girls are being forced into
prostitution for a clientele consisting largely of military services members,
government contractors and international peacekeepers.”

I have met Smith two times and he
is a very fine pro-family congressman.

Mohler said that one report
indicates that young girls have been kidnapped in Eastern Europe “specifically
to be sold to the American contractors to use for sex.” Those contractors were
there under the auspices of the U.S. government to establish peace and security.
Mohler said that representatives of the U.S. government should be setting the
standard for the world, not feeding the problem of sex trafficking.

So the problem is not only
homosexuals in the U.S. military (and in the White House working as a communications
director and other capacities). The problem is larger. It is the U.S. military
not working where they should work — protecting the U.S. borders — and invading
Islamic nations where they endanger the lives of Christians and other international
military interventions that, as warned by Mohler, feed the problem of sex
trafficking of girls and young women.

In this chaotic setting, it is no
wonder that veterans are taking their own lives.

With or without homosexuals in its
ranks, the U.S. military is not behaving correctly regarding invasions, vulnerable
Christian minorities and sex trafficking of girls and young women.

Someone should remove homosexual
activists from the White House and from the U.S. military. And someone should
remove the U.S. military from far away nations and put them to guard the U.S.
borders and sovereignty.