Jones v. United States Probation Office et al

Filing
34

ORDER denying 32 Motion for Reconsideration re 29 Order on Motion to Quash. The probation office is requested to produce all documents responsive to pltf's request directly to my chambers no later than May 16, 2011 and to provide a detailed explanation regarding why it believes the documents should not be produced. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/4/11. (kpr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
BRIDGET R. JONES
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 4:11CV00003 BSM
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE,
SHERIE GRIMES, and SELINA EARSA
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The United States Probation Office’s motion for reconsideration [Doc. No. 32] of the
April 26, 2011, order denying its motion to quash plaintiff’s subpoena is denied. The
probation office may be correct, however, that some of the requested information could be
sensitive in that it may primarily concern persons other than plaintiff. For this reason, the
probation office is ordered to produce all documents responsive to plaintiff’s request directly
to my chambers no later than May 16, 2011. The probation office is requested to provide a
detailed explanation regarding why it believes the documents should not be produced. The
documents, as well as the probation office’s objections, will be reviewed in camera before
a determination is made as to which documents will be produced to plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of May, 2011.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.