Share this:

Like this:

She found financial irregularities ,basically money for foreign aid was going missing.

This is from taxpayers money

When she reported it she was fired

Now she is suing the World Bank and has reported this to the UK and EU Parliament

Nothing in the Mainstream Media TV Newspapers

She has mentioned Andrew Mitchell who was the Minister for the Department for International Development

So my gut feeling was,is the Plebgate saga anything to do with all this business?

So I sent an email through her website Kahudes.net

and she replied promptly as follows:

Dear May,

Yes, one of the reasons that Andrew Mitchell was subjected to Plebgate was because of his corruption in oversight of DFID and the UK’s contribution to the Bretton Woods system. The scope and magnitude of the theft of UK taxpayers’ funds is mind boggling. That was also the reason that David Cameron was raked over the coals on the Letterman show on September 27, 2012 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EB2cxHrZdyg; I had informed CBS of the whole corrupt mess. Here is my and Elaine Colville’s testimony in UK Parliament as well as my testimony in the European Parliament; I am copying Elaine. It is my belief, since both Elaine and I had exhausted all conceivable remedies over many years with Thrasher, that he is incorrigible.

House of Commons International Development Committee, Written Evidence for the inquiry into The work of the Independent Commission for Aid Impact, published July 7, 2012 available here:

House of Commons Public Administration Committee, Written Evidence for the inquiry into Complaints Do They Make A Difference, published July 20, 2013, pages 186-7 (Elaine Colville, another World Bank Whistleblower’s testimony is on Page 178) available here

update – i passed this information to all media sources i could find and got no response-so it makes me wonder -why is there so much interest in andrew mitchell calling a policeman a pleb-but no interest in allegations of fraud?

Share this:

Like this:

Those of you working and struggling to get by -I can understand it makes you angry when you see TV programmes and newspaper articles about lazy welfare scroungers and immigrants,this is propaganda to direct your anger away from the real causes of your inadequate wages.
Its all been planned deliberately by the corporations and bankers since the 1970s
In the 1970s workers standard of living was relatively high-due to unions forcing higher wages and cheap council housing
This is no good for investors and bankers.
Margaret Thatcher came to power and started to change this-influenced by Friedmans Monetarist economic policy and advised by Rothschilds investment bankers.
Monetarism says that a certain level of unemployment is needed -with full employment workers demand higher wages which pushes prices up and leads to high inflation.This also suits the capitalists agenda to keep wages down and increase their profits.
So over time we had privatization of industries that had employed many-leading to job losses,relocation of manufacturing to China funded by banks and private investors,and selling off the cheap council houses,followed by mass immigration ,this led to a perfect supply and demand situation for employers (over supply) and landlords rentiers property developers(over demand)

Now the powers that be who created the situation and profit from it use the media to point the finger at unemployed and immigrants who are merely pawns in the game.