Main menu

Post navigation

Participants are not required to make any connection between the

Participants are not required to make any connection between the words and attributes, only to categorise each correctly within its own domain (i.e. target words into categories as PED or FF and attributes into categories such as ‘healthy’ or ‘performance enhancing’). The IAT concept has been used to detect food preferences [51] and variations of the implicit association

test have been adapted to doping [52] and used in doping research [53–55]. In this project, a modified Brief IAT was used [50] using word stimuli. This is the first application of the implicit cognition measures pertaining performance enhancing substances (PED and FF) that diverge from the classic good/bad or pleasant/unpleasant associations and taps learn more into cognitive attitudes by using associations between different categories of performance enhancing substances (PED and FF) and performance enhancing/healthy attributes. The implicit association test (abbreviated as FF – H/P) was used to ascertain if recreational gym users would associate functional foods with performance

or health; and whether this changed after the information intervention. In this PD-0332991 solubility dmso test, the two target categories were Fruits (Apple, Orange, Kiwi, Banana) and Functional Foods (Celery, Spinach, Lettuce, Beetroot), with Fruits being non-focal. Attributes were Healthy (Vitality, Healthy, Vigour, Wellbeing) and Performance (Speed, Strength, Endurance, Flexibility). Participants were instructed to categorise defined combinations of the focused target and attributes (giving Functional food + Healthy and Functional food + Performance pairings) by pushing a dedicated key on the keyboard whilst pushing an alternative key for ‘everything else’. The non-focal target category, serving as a balance in the 2 × 2 design, only appears in the ‘everything else’ instruction [50] and thus it does not contribute to the implicit association measure. The latency measures were converted into D scores with the following

interpretation: Functional foods – Health (indicated by a negative number) or Performance (indicated by a positive number). The strength and direction of the association between the target words and attributes is shown by D scores, which ranges between +1 and -1. A positive number indicates Afatinib that the subject has a strong association with target A with APR-246 nmr attribute A or target B with attribute B, a negative number indicates that the subject has a strong association with target A with attribute B or target B with attribute A. The closer the D score is to +1 or -1 indicates the strength of this association [50, 56]. The advantage of the D score is that it affords protection against the general cognitive ability confound [57]. The interpretation of the D score is in line with Cohen’s conventional effect sizes of small (d = 0.2 – 0.3), medium (d = 0.5) and strong (d > 0.8) effects [58].