Meh... this is where Pizzagaters lose credibility for me even though they're fighting a good fight.

Extrapolating measurements from an object in the foreground of a picture and applying the same scale to an object at an angle from the background to the foreground isn't scientific by any means. That 4 7/8ths is wrong anyways, his eyes are looking upwards and his jaw is opened in the pic to the right compared to the one on the left.

All this is pure speculation and I wouldn't be surprised if it were a setup to say ''Hurr Durr, pizzagate voaters are dumb & believe anything''

Why the fuck are these pictures cropped anyways ? There's more to them than this meme shows us.

have to side with you. everything you just said about the leg angle is what went through my mind looking at the photo. especially since the numbers dont have to be that far off for the person to go from 6yr old girl to tiny philipino hooker. im not saying hes not a child fucker. but this photo analysis is not as solid as it presents itself to be.

also this was aparently at an asian place so again, tiny asian woman is not totally unbelievable

Thank you. In the oscar photo, both he and his statue are in relatively parallel relationship and flat to the plane of the photo lens. In the leg picture, the leg is no longer in this plane but is connected to a point further back in space, meaning that the perspective will make the leg appear shorter.

Not to mention, simply scaling the leg picture so that Quentin's nose-to-chin ratio is the same in both doesn't work. It might be possible for that to be marginally accurate if Quentin had been standing upright like in the first photo, but he is seated and his head is not at the same angle. Again, perspective. You are taking 2D measurements and extrapolating them to three dimensional objects depicted in 2D. Its tough to do in a precise way when you have totally unrelated photographs of that object in different positions.

This is fucking stupid.

I won't lie. That leg looks young, but it also doesn't appear like a six year old's AT ALL. If you think that leg/foot looks like a six year old limb, you're a fucking retard.

That doesn't negate the possibility it is still an underage teen. It very well could be. But when you start getting into that territory, then it could also be someone in their early 20's. When are women done growing? By 16 or 17 maybe? Meaning its possible that a 15 year old leg could look remarkably similar to a 22 year old leg assuming a woman has maintained the same lifestyle and eating habits. Let's try not to intentionally destroy our credibility here to stir some controversy.

Well, Tarantino is scum, but I'm not sure I go along with the formula here. But, it could be. One of my last girlfriends was 50 years old, she was all of 4'10". She could make 5' in a really high pair of heels.

the person is undoubtedly small. however how far off do these measurements need to be for the person to go from 4' to 4'10"? probably not THAT much. and if shes 4'10 then it drastically alters the odds that we can correctly guess her age as you have pointed out. there are too many unknown variables in the angles, lenses, and distances of these photos to say with confidence that that is a child.

it may well be a child. im not saying its not. im saying this photo constitutes decent evidence, but poor proof.

First off, the woman's leg is jutting out at an angle to Tarantino's face, so instead of 10", it may be closer to 12" or 15" to account for the lost length due to the 2D projection.

Also, a child's leg and foot wouldn't look as mature as this females leg. I think a child's leg would have more fat, like a baby, and wouldn't have as many lines on the foot, showing age. Just looking at the development of the foot, I can't see this on a child as young as 6 years old.

TMZ spotted the director sucking the nail polish off some random woman's foot at Empress sushi joint on the Sunset Strip recently. After the "meal" and a few drinks, Q posed for pictures and hopefully downed some Scope.

Yeah, I totally agree. The chances of it being an adult's leg are infinitesimally small. It's even more disgusting that the left would collude to protect a child rapist. It seems liberalism takes on more an more attributes of a religion than those of a political movement.