Search form

City moving forward on new emergency center

City moving forward on new emergency center

Michele Ellson

Wednesday, March 26, 2014 - 00:05

Updated at 11:20 a.m. Wednesday, March 26 in BOLD

The city is moving forward with plans to construct a long-sought emergency operations center on former Alameda Belt Line property a block away from a mid-Island fire station. Construction is set to begin in October.

“This is an important project for the city,” City Planner Andrew Thomas told the Planning Board, which signed off on the design of the facility Monday night. “It’s going to be important in case of a disaster.”

In an interview, Fire Chief Michael D’Orazi said the city’s existing emergency operations center, which is in the basement of the Alameda Police Department’s 36-year-old headquarters, is too small to run a full-scale response effectively and is lacking the technological infrastructure, breakout, storage and communications facilities the city needs.

The new facility would cover 3,640 square feet over two floors on a 0.57-acre site on Grand and Hibbard streets, which it is to share with a new Fire Station 3. The City Council got a look at a $5 million financing plan for the planned fire station on March 18 and is set to consider approving it in May.

D’Orazi said the city has been working toward building a new emergency operations center for nearly two decades. The facility will be used to manage disaster and crisis responses, and may also be used to conduct city staff and community emergency response team training.

Voters rejected a 2012 sales tax measure that would have paid for a list of items that included the new emergency center, sending the city’s managers on a quest for alternate funding. The council signed off on a plan to refinance existing City Hall bonds in September, releasing $3 million for the facility.

The city conducted a series of community workshops in 2012 and 2013 to discuss the design of the planned facility before seeking the Planning Board’s design approval and an okay from Alameda’s Historic Advisory Board to remove trees from the site where it will be built. City Council approval was not needed to move forward with the facility.

At an earlier design review hearing, Planning Board member John Knox White questioned whether the mid-Island location was a good spot for the new emergency center, due to its proximity to homes and distance from police and fire headquarters. In the interview, D’Orazi, who called the site’s selection “a combination of need and opportunity” that will save the city money since it already owns the property, said it is “neither necessary nor desirable” to have the emergency center near police or fire headquarters or City Hall.

“Having the EOC near other municipal buildings is not ideal because city staff assigned to EOC functions need to be focused on the tasks at hand and not disrupted by other duties or requirements of their employment,” D’Orazi said in response to e-mailed questions from a reporter. “In other words, they won't have the proximity to their offices (and) staff, which could be a distraction.”

He said municipal buildings are “often” a target of demonstrations and other disobedience, which would “not be conducive to efficient operations” when the emergency center is activated.

Hayward’s emergency operations center was built on the second floor of its City Hall when that building was constructed in 1998, a spokesman for the city said, while Oakland’s, built in 2000 at a cost of $4.9 million, is located near the city’s government buildings downtown and also serves as a fire and medical dispatch center and regional training site. Berkeley incorporated its emergency center in a public safety building constructed in 2000; the city's spokesman said the center is a multipurpose room used "almost daily" by police and firefighters for meetings and trainings and that the equipment purchased for it is modular and designed to be set up when the center is activated.

The Planning Board okayed the center’s design with some changes 5-1, with Knox White – who agreed it is needed – dissenting (Kristoffer Köster was absent, though in e-mailed comments he suggested the building be redesigned). Resident Michael John Torrey urged board members to sign off on the plan.

“I would encourage you to move forward with this project,” said Torrey, a member of the Amateur Radio Club of Alameda. “It’s very important, and we need this.”

Comments

The major purpose of the EOC does not appear to be to protect the local population, but to protect city officials from the local population.

Submitted by Bette page (not verified) on Wed, Mar 26, 2014

I assume that the city has not plans to tear down the Victorian on the corner next to it? I see they already cut down all the trees.

Submitted by Tom (not verified) on Wed, Mar 26, 2014

Here is my reposting on this issue:

Firestations and EOC facilities are important but the real problem we face is excessive salaries and benefits we pay police and fire staff!!!!

Nice to have a new EOC and firestation and we certainly need firefighters and police persons to continue to respond to emergencies. However,…….We do not need to pay these employees the excessive salaries and benefits which their unions have secured.

The balance of political power in Alameda is now definitely shifted in the economic interest of the police and fire persons we employ.

The labor market for police and fire employees could be opened up to a cadre of fine qualified persons at a much lower cost for us as taxpayers. The labor market is full of highly qualified young persons who are ready to enter these professions.

Given what the police and fire persons are now paid and the retirement debts,which are unfunded, Alameda will soon be bankrupt as are Vallejo and Stockton. Hopefully economic crisis will ensue to regain city fiscal balance and appropriately reduced salaries and benefits for emergency personnel.

In the near future it is highly likely that significant numbers of Alameda's high paid police and fire will be laid off when economic reality hits our city's fiscal inability to sustain their current inflated salaries and retirement benefits.

Fix the labor cost and unfunded retirement issues first or we will not have staff to fill these magnificent planned facilities!!!

Submitted by Michele Ellson on Wed, Mar 26, 2014

Hi Bette: I haven't seen any plans to tear down any homes to build the fire station or EOC. I gather that part of the reason the site is being used is that the city owns it outright (as opposed to having to purchase more land to site the facility).

Submitted by David (not verified) on Fri, Mar 28, 2014

Has anyone else noted that, of all the things that Measure C promised in 2012, city officials have found ways only to move forward the purchase of fire apparatus, construction of new fire station/eoc, but not the promised swimming pool...

Thank you Planning Board for bring the new EOC to Grand Street and moving those dirty trucks.

Submitted by Bernice (not verified) on Sat, Mar 29, 2014

I am so happy the EOC and Firehouse were approved. Now those dirty old trucks will be relocated.

Submitted by Jason (not verified) on Mon, Mar 31, 2014

Tom, you say lower salaries will open the job market but why is t that working in San Jose?

Submitted by Jerry (not verified) on Wed, Oct 1, 2014

David, there is no plan for a swimming pool because Measure C did not pass to provide the money for it. The City Council was able to find funding and grants from other areas to meet the needs of the EOC and hopefully the Fire Station. If the people wanted a new sports complex they should have voted for it

Comment policy

The Alamedan encourages reader comments that contribute to a constructive discussion of local affairs. We may remove or edit comments that are spam, off-topic, constitute personal attacks or are otherwise felt to detract from a constructive discussion. Commenters are encouraged to use their real names; those who choose to use a pseudonym are asked to use that pseudonym consistently. We do not run comments marked "Anonymous."