While a Greek origin comrade said to me recently that there are many liberal and communist minded among the 'Greek community', a lot of the older people who were formerly non-political, have taken another road.

That makes it sound like the entire Greek community shares these views. We certainly do not! I've spoken to a lot of Europeans about these problems and every single one of them agreed with what I was saying. I do remember one comment that I didn't like. One Greek guy said he knew a couple of Indian men who were "true gentlemen" (his exact words). The next time I got his taxi, he was raving about how the Indians were pigs and had no manners. Some Indian obviously affected him negatively since I last spoke to him.

One elderly Italian taxi driver said to me in Roman times, the Italians used to feed the Africans to the lions. That one had me laughing for a while!

But back on topic. There are many do-gooders in Australia, just as there are in all other white countries but I'm sick of propaganda articles like this. They're basically saying that the entire population thinks this way. This isn't true in the least. You've got your do-gooders, you've got people who think like us and then you've got people in the middle. They're the ones we need to focus on. A lot of think we've got a major problem going on in this country but are afraid to say anything. How can the word "racist" have such a powerful effect? Is it going to physically hurt you? Is it going to come knocking on the door? No. It's just a word and people need to get past it or nothing will ever change.

I hope a good portion of the Greek community supports the opening of this Golden Dawn office. I'm not in Melbourne but my support is there in spirit. I also hope other white Australians and Europeans will support them because they're do nothing by good in Greece and that will spread to other white nations. If I know Greeks, they're certainly not afraid to say what's on their minds (same goes for the Italians).

Indeed! No one was suggesting that the entire Greek community in Australia is 'liberal'. Quite the contrary and the proclamations made by certain pubications and persons to this effect should be rejected.

Of course, the 'official' view is liberal. It is this liberal group which not only preaches the virtues of open borders and economic and political globalism in Greece, but agrees with these prescriptions for Australia.

They also strive through state multiculturalism to isolate the whole Greek migrant group and their descendants from other Europeans and the native-Australian core by playing at multiculturalism.

Up to now, the multiculti industry has tried to persaude Greek migrants to think of 'home' before they think of Australia and relate to Australia only through the eyes of 'home'. But the Greek crisis has made many look at what their old country has become and has led many to ponder over whether Golden Dawn is right. This also changes their sense of Place too and if Greece is in crisis because of multiracialism and globalism - then what of Australia?

It can be expected that the presence of Golden Dawn will deepen the division between the 'official' Greek view and the popular view as Australia First has said.

It should be noted that similar tensions also exist in other European migrant groups.

Over the years Australian nationalists have often debated how to unite the Euro migrant groups around the core, how to achieve a single identity.

It can only proceed by breaking the multiculti organized 'unity' of the migrant groups and finding a new unity around the issues of race, immigration and globalization, first by having groups look at their old countries and then looking at their new one.

Undoubtedly a lot more about all this will be said.

From the Australian point of view: it has often been debated what sort of 'nationalism' is being talked about. The key lies in Australia's past. This nationalism which was born in the 1890's was simultaneously native to the soil and a reflection of a higher idea - the unity of the entire European group across the globe. There was no division between the two concepts. This general idea now has relevance when it comes to the necessary politics to unite all the Euro migrant groups around the core.

A quick look about that site will show the party to be multiracialist, assimilationist and Christian Zionist.

A look at the Q Society is equally instructive.

We understand that officials of the Christian Democratic Party will meet Wilders today.

Another look at The LIberal Party And Its Satellites might be useful. Wilders is melding together an alliance of sorts amongst the CDP, Rise Up, Q Society, the Freedom Party (the Protectionust split-away) and so forth. Who does all that serve?

Some members have written to the party about the tour of the Dutch Freedom Party parliamentarian, Geert Wilders. What did Australia First Party think of it all?

We issued a press release onto the party’s website at Australia First Party | Community Action and Elections Information and forwarded this release on to certain media (mainly radio stations). We were told that an unidentified station did mention Australia First was not supporting the Wilders tour. This fact was also mentioned last year on Late Line at the ABC, so the party position was long standing and not an immediate reaction to events.

Simply: we did not support the Wilders tour, nor do we sympathize with him.

The Australia First Party sees beyond the media hype and the leftist rant directed at Wilders. Wilders was called “far right”, “racist” “Islamophobic” and so forth. It might actually be better (sic) if Wilders really was any of those things!!!

Yes I said that right, because sadly, the truth is he is something else and not really anything good - unless we take it that he told a few sharp home-truths about the nature of Islam (not just as a religion, but as an ideology) and the dangerous impact of Islamic migration into European countries and Australia. He told us of Islamic violence, terrorism, ghettoes and the hate directed at the Dutch.

However, like a gold-panner, you have to look for the nuggets and not be tricked by the fools-gold.

Amidst the truths Wilders told, his line was such that if implemented by Australian patriotic people, it would send us all up a very false road. When Wilders spoke, and at every opportunity, he kept referring to “assimilating” these migrants as the solution to their separateness, about our “Judaeo-Christian values” as our strength and about Zionist “Israel” as the first line of defence against Islamism.

Wilders politics are an unhelpful and misleading system of thought. The pro Australian view would be different. First, assimilating Islamic migrants is not only impossible, but ethnically undesirable. Second, “Judaeo-Christianity” is an ideological construct that morphs Christianity into something very different from the true Faith and whose purpose in wrapped up in the third point - the defence of Israel as some Godly creation, when it is more the problem in the Middle East than all the nutteries of radical-Islam.

So: is Wilders just wrong or is he deliberately wrong?

Wilders has two inter-related points: one relates to the Middle East and the other to Islamic migrants. So we started at the start.

Australia First Party asked – who pays Wilders’s bills? The answer isn’t pretty. It was exposed in the Dutch media recently that much of his funding comes from the USA, courtesy of the David Horowitz Foundation, Pamela Gellar’s groups and Daniel Pipes’s circle. These forces are for the defence of Israel by destabilizing the Middle East and scream for war against Iran. Some of them played an ignominious role in the false war in Iraq.

It was for no little reason that some years ago I was interviewed by an American website and my discussion was entitled ‘Neither Islam Nor Israel’. I argued for absolute neutrality on the Middle East, but was not foolish enough to believe that neutrality is easy to win.

Indeed, to become to be neutral in the Middle East’s politics is impossible when the likes of Wilders attempt to distort an Australian nationalist reaction against Islamism into a hidden agenda to drum up community support for Israel and its wars. The Australian Establishment supports Israel and the Zionist ideology and so does a host of petty groups from the Q Society, the Christian Democratic Party, the new Rise Up Australia Party, the Protectionists, a so-called Australian Party For Freedom and others, who all link through to the ‘right’ of the Liberal Party. The little groups make lots of noise and are rightly described by Australia First as “satellites” of the Liberal Party.

Wilders then mobilizes his forces against “Islamisation” here. That means by upholding liberal values of “freedom” against the Islamic totalitarians. And what is this “freedom”? It is the freedom of same sex marriage, to live the ‘gay’ lifestyle, to belittle families, to live the life of the economic cog in the wheel and to make the dollars at everyone else’s expense. It is the freedom to sexualize everything and to live lives so private that there is no real community just a market place governed by ‘laws’.

It is open to argue that these false freedoms are the very things undermining our civilisation. We can understand any critique of the barbarity of Islamic law and social principle, but we cannot accept that liberalism is the antidote to Islamism.

So, with Wilders way off beam, we prefer to go our own way – in the defence of the Australian identity and for struggle to create an order of things that values our people and its freedom to be itself, an independent Australia free of the Middle East entanglement because our Islamic migrants may be encouraged to return to Muslim countries and the Zionist apparatus in all its forms be dismantled in Australia.

And one final word.

There was another dark side to the tour which concerns us deeply as it is sure to impact in the future on Australia First.

Wilders deserved free speech. He did not get it. Venues were cancelled after threats from extreme leftists and possibly Islamist groups. In at least one case, an attendee was assaulted by a certain Anthony Main, a Trotskyite ‘Socialist Party’ councillor from Yarra. One nationalist minded website published the following:

No crime should go unpunished! It is the duty of our nations police forces to protect its citizens from crimes and investigate crimes carried out on the innocent. Please use this info to anonymously contact Victorian police crimestoppers:

Suspect Anthony Main, first seen in video at 0.16 wearing grey long sleeve shirt. Suspects picture from Yarra Council web site (http://www.yarracity.vic.gov.au/Medi...yarra-council/) clearly identifies Anthony Main as person who assaults elderly gent at 02.10 on video then again at 02.13 of video. Anthony Main is then seen at 02.15 on video standing back in crowd with hands behind his back.

Better still if you are resident in Victoria please contact your local police and pass this information onto them. It may help in the arrest of this Trotskyite thug.

If Australia First practised the intimidation engaged in by Mr. Main and his friends, we would have been called “fascist” at once.

The Wilders’ Zionist circus is over, but the Liberal satellites will ramp up the noise about Islamism in Australia, not so much to highlight a real immigration and cultural problem, but to siphon support for the tough Libs who will support Israel and so on.

Let me be very frank: if there is an immigration issue (and there is!), it might be better said that the focus should be on Chinese imperialism and its plans in Australia and the open conspiracy to flood northern Australia with ‘refugees’ and new immigrants drawn from all over the Third World.

I disagree with you. The glass is either half-empty or it is half-full, and you're seeing it as half-empty. Wilders may not have everything right, but I disagree that him touring is "unhelpful" to the nationalist cause. On the contrary, the attention that he has attracted has boosted the morale of nationalists, increased interest in nationalist parties and organisations, and it will help awaken people to the evils of mass immigration. If Wilders can help to get people questioning the value of one immigrant group to Australia, then this could be an important stepping stone to getting them to question the value of the next group, and indeed the whole policy of "non-discriminatory" mass immigration.

Also, the response of the mainstream politicians in condemning Wilders will also hopefully awaken a few as to how beholden these politicians are to the all-powerful Multiculturalist agenda. If it helps to get a few people questioning, then it can only be good.

I disagree with you. The glass is either half-empty or it is half-full, and you're seeing it as half-empty. Wilders may not have everything right, but I disagree that him touring is "unhelpful" to the nationalist cause. On the contrary, the attention that he has attracted has boosted the morale of nationalists, increased interest in nationalist parties and organisations, and it will help awaken people to the evils of mass immigration. If Wilders can help to get people questioning the value of one immigrant group to Australia, then this could be an important stepping stone to getting them to question the value of the next group, and indeed the whole policy of "non-discriminatory" mass immigration.

Also, the response of the mainstream politicians in condemning Wilders will also hopefully awaken a few as to how beholden these politicians are to the all-powerful Multiculturalist agenda. If it helps to get a few people questioning, then it can only be good.

I agree. Whilst I don't support Wilders, I do like the fact that him visiting has upset the Marxist left and their PC religion.

I agree. Whilst I don't support Wilders, I do like the fact that him visiting has upset the Marxist left and their PC religion.

He's pro-assimilation. That's like saying the APP is helpful because they wield out some mule-kicked hicks in flanno hats to wave flags and taunt Muslims every once in a while to prove how easily they go to pieces at the first sign of antis heckling. This cult of Wilders is really getting up my nose because it's due to the Israel-loving policies that come off men like him that we engage in useless wars in the Middle East which cause more of those camel ticklers to turn up here in the first place. It's USELESS pointing your finger at this group or that because it's the god-damned governments letting the swine in. They never asked Aussies in the first place, so assuming that old Hebrew-admiring Geert is going to whip everyone into a Muslim-hating lather that will turn the tide of opinion of the political class to the point they round 'em all up and ship them back to Karachi is never going to happen. It will require the removal of that political class. And meanwhile, while we're all hating on Mussies, another boat load of sexually frustrated brown-skinned invaders wash up from Sri Lanka; or more Asian breeders; or more Africuns, mon; Islanders; and all the absolute debris that this sorry earth has to offer. And don't get me wrong -- I LOATHE Muslims, probably like no other. But I have enough good sense to see that they're the symptom and not the cause.

There's far too many brain dead and irrational civic nationalists in this country as it is, without this idiot further peddling the anti-Islam BS in Australia.

Muslims are never going to take over Australia. We don't even get that many Muslim immigrants coming here. They breed a lot but they're probably being out-bred by aborigines and pacific islanders anyway, who I generally feel more uncomfortable around than Muslims.

I am so unbelievably sick of everything being against Muslims in Australia when no other group is copping the same. Muslims are so far down the list of threats to this country it's becoming unbearable.