Memo to Jonathan Capehart

Well, it clearly expressed the view that DOMA had been an act of political expediency and was unconstitutional – and should be overturned. But the Capehart(ed) Crusader wanted more: He wanted an overt, explicit apology from Clinton.

Until you’re willing to do that, don’t you dare whine about Bill Clinton applying the principle of ‘incremental progress’ – Clinton’s re-election being a wee bit more important to the nation than a symbolic veto (one which would have been instantaneously overridden) of a bill outlawing something that did not exist yet – to what was then, is now and always will be Gay, Inc’s only real priority.