HOME

Sunday, September 1, 2013

Hearing news 11-09-2013:Honorable court has demanded moderate marks and raw marks (original marks given by examiner) of students from BPSC. Next hearing on 1st October.(Hearing on BPSC Moderation case has started. First hearing took place on 10 September in double bench of Patna High Court headed by honorable Chief Justice Rekha M. Doshit. BPSC said that it has already declared the final result, but petitioners advocates countered BPSC and said that when case was referred to larger bench, why final result was declared? Hearing will be continued for few more days.)I had mentioned in one of my posts that moderation case was
pending with larger bench, although written stay was not there yet morality
says that result should not bepublished but BPSC morality-----. My
apprehension proved right. It is irony that when UPSC has introduced ethics,
morality and human value in Civil Services mains syllabus, one public service commission
is joking with these issues. We shouldn't forget that two months before mains
examination result declaration, BPSC hosted symposium of all public service
commissions in which UPSC also participated. But I have already said that
talking about BPSC morality, is nothing but wasting your time, hence I am
focusing on main points.

No doubt final result is published, and some may argue that
now everything is over, and frankly speaking, they are not wrong altogether. But that doesn't mean chapter is closed. Honorable Chief Justice is going to hear the moderation
case (CWJC 9569/2013), most probably from 2nd September, 2013. BPSC has
already published the marks of candidates (CLICK HERE FOR YOUR MAINS MARKSHEET), and students (those fighting against BPSC’s so called unjust
moderation) are equipped with more proofs. These proofs might prove fatal for
BPSC (I might be too optimistic), if honorable Double bench doesn’t sympathize
with BPSC. Only one thing that is in favor of BPSC is that it has already completed
it's process. On this basis it might plead to reject the case, and in earlier occasions,
BPSC has succeeded getting relief on this bais. But moderation case is different ball game. Honorable
Justice Ravi Ranjan has himself said clearly that BPSC moderation is bogus, and
he even said that BPSC should have followed scaling method. He referred it to
larger bench seeing the intensity of the case. Hence it cannot be said that ‘Process
Complete’ argue is going to help BPSC.
BPSC proceeded on its own, neither students nor court is responsible for
that. BPSC itself is responsible for that; it has to pay the price. Why every
time poor students will pay for BPSC’s fault? From preliminary examination to interview
level, it has committed blunders. Here are some of the blunders:

1.
In preliminary examination, more than 10
questions were deleted: students paid for it

3.
Moderation: In Mathematics and Chemistry some
students scored more than 180 marks out of 200, and in philosophy some students
scored only 5. Can you believe it? How a student of humanity can compare with
mathematics and Chemistry? Which type of moderation was adopted? Patna high
court had ordered (Justice Katriar) BPSC to follow moderation and scaling seeing
the boom factor. But this time some other subjects outperformed some other
subjects. Nothing changed: students paid the price.

4.
Some physically handicapped (General) candidates
are saying that their marks are more than the written cut off, yet they were
not called for interview. Even the gap between written cut off and final cut
off for general physically handicapped is 205. How can one score 200 out of
150?

These are some of the examples which show BPSC’s “HUM NAHI
SUDHRENGE” approach. But one should not forget that now we are leaving in
virtual world and RTI world, where social media is too active and it has a
capability to create a movement against wrongdoings. BPSC fighter group is one
of such movements which are fighting against injustice caused to the
candidates. It is duty of all interest group to come forward and fight against
the injustice done by BPSC, so that next generation couldn’t face similar
situation.

Today BPSC moderation hearing took place in the chief justice bench. During hearing, when bpsc advocate lalit kishore said that process has been completed, then senior advocate girijee and kanthjee asked him that when case was pending in the larger bench, then why he declared the result? Students adovate also asked whether bpsc was sure that case would be in its favor, so that it declared the result? Hearing will continue tomorrow.