Intended as a discussion group, the blog has evolved to be more of a reading list of current issues affecting our county, its government and people. All reasonable comments and submissions welcomed. Email us at: bill.pysson@gmail.com
REMEMBER: To view our sister blog for education issues: www.district100watchdog.blogspot.com

August 24, 2011

By Benjamin Yount | Illinois Statehouse News

SPRINGFIELD — Illinois is touting a $5 million federal grant to set up health-care exchanges as part of the national health care law, but residents may not have access to an exchange for a couple years.

Illinois wants to have an exchange ready for federal review by 2013, said Kate Gross, assistant director for health planning at the Illinois Department of Insurance. If Illinois fails to set up its exchange by January 2014, it will be required to use an exchange chosen by federal officials.

These consultants or firms will write a report for lawmakers that details how the state should proceed to create a health-care exchange, Gross said.

A handful of full-time state employees in the Department of Insurance also are working on the exchange project, but Gross said more outside help is needed.

Illinois has spent $1 million on consultants to study Illinois' health insurance needs, but Gross said the state needed additional consultants to discern where to begin.

That report, provided by Wakely Consulting Group, a private consulting group fromfrom Boston, suggests broad goals, such as using technology to identify under-insured populations and foster a competitive health-insurance marketplace.

But the report does not suggest how the state can accomplish these goals. Lawmakers are going to have to decide how to follow up on the report's vague goals.

The federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s health insurance exchanges are intended to help consumers shop for coverage in the same way airline travelers look for airfare bargains online.

The Legislative Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability held its first study committee meeting Wednesday morning in Chicago. The lawmakers discussed a number of topics, but did not arrive at any solutions. The commission is expected to meet next week here.

Legislation signed by Gov. Pat Quinn in July started Illinois toward the health-care exchanges. SB 1555 requires businesses with less than 50 employees to spend at least $2,750 per employee on health insurance for their workers. The legislation also sets an October 2013 deadline, but does not specify how the exchanges will be governed.

Until a health-care exchange is finalized, and up and running, Jamie Lewis is not going to worry. Lewis and her husband, Troy, own Heritage Landscape and Design in Moline.

"You never know what's going to happen until it gets put through,” said Lewis.

Lewis said her firm, which employs about 26 people for landscape design and hardscape work, pays for about half of the health insurance bill for its workers, but she did not specify the actual amount.

If the health-care exchange doesn't deliver cheaper alternative, Lewis said, “we'll just hire less people," but she won’t be laying off any people.

Kim Clarke Maisch, the Illinois director for the National Federation of Independent Business, or NFIB, which lobbies and advocates for small- and medium-sized businesses, said those kinds of decisions are what she hopes lawmakers keep in mind, as they craft Illinois' health-care exchange.

"Who gets to be part of the exchange? Are employers going to have to pay for part-time workers?" Maisch said. "There's a lot of technical things, but very important aspects to the exchange that will make it or break it."

Maisch said she and her group are not opposed to health-care exchanges. But some private groups, including NFIB, and several states, not Illinois, have filed a lawsuit against the federal government over the requirement that people buy insurance. Opponents of the law say it's unconstitutional for the government to force someone to buy health insurance.

A federal court in Atlanta earlier this month ruled that the mandate went beyond Congress' power. The ruling is the second on the federal health care law. The first upheld the mandate.

Costs for the exchanges are likely to vary from state to state, depending on how they build their exchanges.

August 23, 2011

By Benjamin Yount | Illinois Statehouse News

SPRINGFIELD — Illinois’ regional school superintendents are going to have to show a central Illinois judge why he should force the state to pay them if the superintendents are going to get a paycheck anytime soon.

But it will be Thursday before the superintendents learn if their case will go forward.

Sangamon County Circuit Judge John Schmidt on Tuesday delayed a hearing on the restraining order request, giving lawyers for Quinn more time to prepare their response to the lawsuit. Schmidt scheduled a hearing Thursday, and tipped both sides to the question he wants answered.

“Temporary restraining orders usually stop something,” Schmidt said. “This request would force the state to start paying the superintendents. I’d like to hear arguments on that.”

Terence Corrigan, assistant bureau chief for the Illinois Attorney General’s Springfield office, argued the case Tuesday on behalf of the Quinn administration. Corrigan asked Schmidt for more time to deal with what Corrigan called the “serious constitutional issues” involved in the superintendents’ requests.

Kelly Kraft, the governor’s budget spokeswoman, said the administration continues to talk with Daiber and the regional superintendents.

“We continue to work toward a short-term solution to ensure payment through the veto session,” Kraft said. “The conversations continue to be productive.”

The governor has said for months that he wants to pay the superintendents, but wants to take the money from local sources. Local voters elect regional superintendents, but the state pays their nearly $100,000 a year salaries.

But Quinn’s plan to shift superintendents’ pay from the state to local taxpayers requires action from the Illinois General Assembly. Lawmakers are not expected to be back at the Capitol until late October. Once they return, there also is a possibility that legislators will overrule Quinn’s veto and restore state funding for the superintendents.

Daiber is quick to say the superintendents cannot wait that long.

“We already have one regional superintendent who intends to leave at the end of this month because of the situation,” Daiber said.