Conclusions.:
Overexpression of TGF-α in the corneal epithelium induces changes in anterior segment morphology. Corneal endothelial abnormalities are associated with the activation of the noncanonical Wnt and RhoA/ROCK signaling axis, indicating a potential application of RhoA/ROCK inhibitors as a therapeutic strategy for certain types of secondary angle-closure glaucoma.

Introduction

Transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-α) belongs to the epidermal growth factor (EGF) family of mitogens. Both TGF-α and EGF exert their biological activity by binding to the EGF receptor (EGFR). TGF-α was first discovered in the medium of virus-transformed cells.1 TGF-α and EGFR also coexpress in many types of tumors, including breast carcinomas,2 renal carcinomas,3 and melanomas.4 TGF-α was also found in wound fluid from skin graft donor site wounds.5 However, the expression of TGF-α is not restricted to pathologic conditions. It also plays a pivotal role in embryonic development and adult homeostasis. TGF-α null mice display pronounced waviness of whiskers and fur, suggesting the role of TGF-α in hair follicle development. This animal also has subtle eye abnormalities. Some TGF-α null mice were born with their eyes partially open. The corneal epithelium appeared uniformly thinner and corneal inflammation was observed in affected eyes.6,7 In addition to its role in hair and eye development, both EGF and TGF-α are also components of human tear fluid, indicating their role in corneal epithelial homeostasis.8

Although TGF-α is essential for normal eye development, excess TGF-α has detrimental effects on ocular surface morphogenesis during development. For example, it has been reported that α-crystallin promoter-driven human TGF-α overexpression in the lens manifested multiple eye defects including corneal opacities, cataracts, and microphthalmia due to altered cell fate of mesenchymal cells during embryonic eye development.9 Interestingly, phenotypes of transgenic mice appeared associated with the level of TGF-α. For example, a milder phenotype was also noted in a similar transgenic mouse line expressing a lower level of TGF-α. In mildly affected transgenic eyes, the corneal endothelium did not differentiate properly and the iris directly attached to the cornea, manifesting a typical anterior segment dysgenesis (ASD) phenotype.10 ASD is usually caused by mutation of genes critical for anterior segment morphogenesis, including Pitx2,11FoxC1,12FoxE3,13BMP4,14Cyp1b1,15RXRα,16 and DKK.17 However, it is unclear whether TGF-α altered the expression pattern of those ASD genes during the anterior segment morphogenesis.

Dox induction was administered through Dox chow (1 g/kg) without restriction. Experimental transgenic mice induced with Dox from postnatal day 20 (P20) to different ages including P22 (Dox2), P25 (Dox5), and up to P40 (Dox20). The eyes were enucleated and subjected to histologic analysis and immunocytochemistry. Animals were housed under pathogen-free conditions in accordance with institutional guidelines. Animal care and use conformed to the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. All animal protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Cincinnati.

Western blot was performed to verify the expression of TGF-α in experimental animals. Mice were euthanized and the corneas were immediately dissected and placed in 400 μL in PBS containing 3% CHAPS and protease inhibitors. The corneas were then homogenized with a cell-disrupting reagent (FastPrep Cell Disrupter; BIO 101, Vista, CA). Following homogenization and centrifugation, supernatants were collected and protein concentration was determined by the absorbance at 280 nm using a spectrophotometer (Nanodrop 2000; Nano Drop Technologies, Wilmington, DE). An equal amount of protein (40 μg) was loaded into each well of the 4%–12% Bis-Tris gel with MES SDS running buffer (Invitrogen) and Western blotting was performed using rabbit anti-TGF-α antibody (ab9585; Abcam); normalization was done with anti-actin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).

Measurement of Intraocular Pressure and Endothelial Morphology

IOP was measured in the morning between 10 and 11 AM, at each time point of day 0, day 5, day 10, and day 20 after induction by using a tonometer (TonoLab; Colonial Medical Supply, Franconia, NH). Two groups of mice, 4 to 6 weeks of age, were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine hydrochloride (0.1 mg/gm body weight) and xylazine (0.02 mg/gm body weight). The tonometer (TonoLab; Colonial Medical Supply) was applied to the right cornea of each mouse for measuring IOP. All data (IOP measurements) are presented as means ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Student's t-test to assess the statistical significance. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

In vivo analysis of the corneal endothelium was performed with a retinal tomograph (Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph–HRT II Rostock Cornea Module; Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, a drop of disappearing preservative (GenTeal Gel; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, NJ) was applied to the tip of the HRT-II objective as immersion fluid. Subsequently, a series of images were collected to cover the whole corneal thickness as a continuous z-axis scan at 1- to 3-μm increments, starting from the corneal epithelium and ending at the corneal endothelium.

RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR

Total RNAs were isolated from eight pooled corneas by rapid separation of total RNA (FastRNA Pro Green Kit using a FastPrep Instrument; MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH). In all, 5 μg of total RNA were reverse transcribed using a synthesis kit for qRT-PCR (Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit; Fermentas GmbH, St. Leon-Rot, Germany). PCR reactions were performed on a real-time PCR system (CFX96 using CFX Manager Software; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Primer sequences used in the study are listed in the Table. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as the housekeeping gene to normalize expression levels.

Bitransgenic mice Krt12rtTA/tet-O-TGF-α specifically overexpress TGF-α in corneal epithelial cells upon Dox induction (Fig. 1A). Without Dox induction, the Krt12rtTA/tet-O-TGF-α double-transgenic mice exhibited no anomaly in the cornea or other tissues and survived normally in the vivarium. After 10 days of Dox induction, the cornea became opaque (Figs. 1Bc, 1Bd). New blood vessels emerged and grew toward the central cornea after 20 days of induction (Figs. 1Be, 1Bf). The expression level of TGF-α was significantly increased after 10 days of Dox induction, as revealed by Western blot analysis (Fig. 1C).

Overexpression of TGF-α in adult corneal epithelium caused limbal epithelial hyperplasia and iridocorneal angle closure. There were two major differences between control (A) and TGF-α–expressing eyes (B) as revealed by H&E staining, the thickness of limbal epithelium and anatomic configuration of the iris (B). The thickness of the limbal epithelium was dramatically increased and the iris positioned in a flat plane in experimental eyes. High magnification showed massive limbal epithelial tissue in the experimental eye (D) as compared with the control eye (C). Control eye (E) had a normal iridocorneal angle, whereas extra tissue was clearly visible in the closed angle of the TGF-α–expressing eye (F).

Figure 2

Overexpression of TGF-α in adult corneal epithelium caused limbal epithelial hyperplasia and iridocorneal angle closure. There were two major differences between control (A) and TGF-α–expressing eyes (B) as revealed by H&E staining, the thickness of limbal epithelium and anatomic configuration of the iris (B). The thickness of the limbal epithelium was dramatically increased and the iris positioned in a flat plane in experimental eyes. High magnification showed massive limbal epithelial tissue in the experimental eye (D) as compared with the control eye (C). Control eye (E) had a normal iridocorneal angle, whereas extra tissue was clearly visible in the closed angle of the TGF-α–expressing eye (F).

The observation of an altered iridocorneal angle caused by excess TGF-α led us to believe that this may lead to an increase in IOP, which started to increase 5 days after Dox induction. After 20 days of induction, the IOP doubled (Fig. 3A). In control mice, the retinal ganglion cell layer consisted of one to two layers of well-organized cells (Fig. 3B). After 20 days of TGF-α expression, a single layer of sparse ganglion cells was evident, suggesting the loss of retinal ganglion cells (Fig. 3C). GFAP, a marker of activated glial cells in response to pathologic insults, has been reported in retinal detachment, mechanical injury, retinal degeneration, and glaucoma.20 In control eyes, only the inner layer of the retina (nerve fiber and ganglion cell layers) was weakly positive (Fig. 3D). After 2 days of TGF-α expression, weak positive signals began to show up in all layers of the retina (Fig. 3E). After 5 days of induction, strong positive signals were found in elongated cells extending from the inner retinal cell layer to the outer cell layer of photoreceptors (Fig. 3F). Similar but intensified signals were observed after 20 days of induction (Fig. 3G).

TGF-α expression led to elevated IOP, Müller glial cell activation, and retinal ganglion cell loss (A), IOP was measured in single- and double-transgenic mice before Dox induction and recorded as day 0. After 5, 10, and 20 days of Dox induction, IOP values of single-transgenic mice were steady during the course of induction, whereas IOP values of double-transgenic mice increased steadily and significantly. The data were collected from four mice of each group. TGF-α expression led to retinal ganglion cell loss (B, C). In control mice (B), the retinal ganglion cell layer consisted of one to two layers of well-organized cells (arrow). After 20 days of TGF-α expression, a single layer of sparse ganglion cells was evident (C). Immunoreactivity for GFAP in the retina revealed progressive activation of Müller glial cells by TGF-α expression (D–G). Before Dox induction (D), GFAP was localized in the nerve fibers and ganglion cell layer. After 2 days of induction (E), GFAP-positive signals were visible in all layers of the retina. After 5 days of induction (F), strong immunoreactivity was found in nerve fiber, ganglion cell layers, and in elongated cells extending across the whole section of the retina. The signal intensified after 20 days of induction (G).

Figure 3

TGF-α expression led to elevated IOP, Müller glial cell activation, and retinal ganglion cell loss (A), IOP was measured in single- and double-transgenic mice before Dox induction and recorded as day 0. After 5, 10, and 20 days of Dox induction, IOP values of single-transgenic mice were steady during the course of induction, whereas IOP values of double-transgenic mice increased steadily and significantly. The data were collected from four mice of each group. TGF-α expression led to retinal ganglion cell loss (B, C). In control mice (B), the retinal ganglion cell layer consisted of one to two layers of well-organized cells (arrow). After 20 days of TGF-α expression, a single layer of sparse ganglion cells was evident (C). Immunoreactivity for GFAP in the retina revealed progressive activation of Müller glial cells by TGF-α expression (D–G). Before Dox induction (D), GFAP was localized in the nerve fibers and ganglion cell layer. After 2 days of induction (E), GFAP-positive signals were visible in all layers of the retina. After 5 days of induction (F), strong immunoreactivity was found in nerve fiber, ganglion cell layers, and in elongated cells extending across the whole section of the retina. The signal intensified after 20 days of induction (G).

N-Cadherin is an endothelial cell marker, and N-cadherin staining in the control eye was positive on the endothelial side, whereas cells at the angle and anterior iris were negative (Fig. 4A). A similar N-cadherin pattern kept unchanged after 5 days of Dox induction (Figs. 4B, 4C). After 20 days of the induction, N-cadherin–positive cells were found on both sides of the angle (Fig. 4D). PCNA staining was used to verify endothelial cell proliferation. In control eyes, PCNA-positive cells were restricted to the basal cells of the corneal epithelium (Fig. 4E). Upon TGF-α expression, PCNA epithelial staining intensified and decorated several layers of the epithelium. PCNA-positive cells were also present in the limbal stroma (Fig. 4F). After 5 days of Dox induction, positive, albeit weak, PCNA cells can be found in the corneal endothelium (Fig. 4G). After 20 days of Dox induction, PCNA-positive cells were found on both sides of the angle, with a stronger fluorescence signal on the peripheral anterior iris (Fig. 4H). Excess TGF-α changed cell morphology and reduced cell density of the corneal endothelium. Live images of the corneal endothelium were taken by HRT II Rostock cornea module (Carl Zeiss). Corneal endothelial cells mostly exhibited a hexagonal shape in untreated mice (Fig. 4I), but assumed diffuse abnormality of the corneal endothelial cells with pleomorphism in size and shape. The loss of clear hexagonal cell shape in the treated mice was also evident (Fig. 4J). In addition, the endothelial cell density of Dox-treated mice was reduced by 19.4% as compared with the nontreated mice (from 2736 ± 28 cells/mm2 to 2204 ± 43 cells/mm2). These phenomena recapitulate some features of the ICE syndrome.

TGF-α expression led to corneal endothelial abnormality. N-Cadherin is the marker to track corneal endothelium. After 2 days of induction, corneal endothelium and trabecular meshwork were positive (A, B). After 5 days of induction, only the endothelium was positive (C). After 20 days of induction, N-cadherin–positive cells were also visible on the anterior iris, forming a continuous cell layer blocking the iridocorneal angle (arrow in [D]). Cell proliferation marker PCNA was positive in the corneal epithelium (E–H). Before induction, it was negative on corneal stroma and iris (E). Two to 5 days after induction, positive cells were also visible in the stroma (F, G). Twenty days after induction, both the corneal endothelium and peripheral iris were positive (H). Excess TGF-α changed the cell morphology and reduced cell density of the corneal endothelium. Live images of the corneal endothelium were taken by HRT II Rostock cornea module. Corneal endothelial cells mostly exhibited a hexagonal shape in untreated mice (I), but assumed diffuse abnormality with pleomorphism in size and shape in the treated mice (J). In addition, the endothelial cell density of Dox-treated mice reduced by 19.4% as compared with the nontreated mice (from 2736 ± 28 cells/mm2 to 2204 ± 43 cells/mm2).

Figure 4

TGF-α expression led to corneal endothelial abnormality. N-Cadherin is the marker to track corneal endothelium. After 2 days of induction, corneal endothelium and trabecular meshwork were positive (A, B). After 5 days of induction, only the endothelium was positive (C). After 20 days of induction, N-cadherin–positive cells were also visible on the anterior iris, forming a continuous cell layer blocking the iridocorneal angle (arrow in [D]). Cell proliferation marker PCNA was positive in the corneal epithelium (E–H). Before induction, it was negative on corneal stroma and iris (E). Two to 5 days after induction, positive cells were also visible in the stroma (F, G). Twenty days after induction, both the corneal endothelium and peripheral iris were positive (H). Excess TGF-α changed the cell morphology and reduced cell density of the corneal endothelium. Live images of the corneal endothelium were taken by HRT II Rostock cornea module. Corneal endothelial cells mostly exhibited a hexagonal shape in untreated mice (I), but assumed diffuse abnormality with pleomorphism in size and shape in the treated mice (J). In addition, the endothelial cell density of Dox-treated mice reduced by 19.4% as compared with the nontreated mice (from 2736 ± 28 cells/mm2 to 2204 ± 43 cells/mm2).

To find out the molecular mechanism underlying the endothelial abnormality, we took another approach. It was previously demonstrated that overexpression of TGF-α in the lens during embryonic development causes anterior segment dysgenesis (ASD) of the eye.10 We analyzed the expression of ASD genes in the corneas of our adult TGF-α–expressing mice. As expected, the expressions of several ASD genes were downregulated by TGF-α induction as shown by qRT-PCR, including: RXRα, Pitx2, FoxC1, and DKK3 (Fig. 5A). It has been proposed that retinoic acid, Pitx2/FoxC1, and DKK play critical roles during anterior segment development by suppressing canonical Wnt signaling.21 So we analyzed the expression of canonical Wnt targets. We chose four genes (Axin1, Axin2, Lef1, and TCF4) in Wnt/beta-catenin signaling, two of which (Axin2 and Lef1) were previously reported as targets of Wnt signaling.22,23 Because we observed a downregulation of Wnt signaling suppressors, we expected Axin2 and Lef1 to be upregulated. To our surprise, they were downregulated (Fig. 5B), suggesting the suppression of canonical Wnt signaling. Next, we analyzed the expression of Wnt ligands. Only the Wnt ligands with cycle threshold (Ct) value below 30 are shown. Among them, Wnt4, Wnt5a, and Wnt9a (Wnt14) were upregulated more than 2-fold (Fig. 5C). All of them are noncanonical Wnt ligands. Another noncanonical Wnt ligand (Wnt11) was downregulated. Because Wnt5a can activate RhoA, leading to increased phosphorylation of myosin light chain (MLC), we wanted to see if the phosphorylated-MLC pattern was altered in our samples. After 2 days of induction, a strong phospho-MLC signal started showing up in the angle region, possibly in the trabecular meshwork (Fig. 5E). After 5 days of induction, both corneal endothelium and trabecular meshwork were heavily decorated with MLC-P (Fig. 5F). After 20 days of induction, the closed angle and both sides of the angle were positive (Fig. 5G). The downregulation of canonical Wnt targets and upregulation of noncanonical Wnt ligands and increased MLC phosphorylation suggested the activation of noncanonical Wnt signaling.

Noncanonical Wnt signal was activated in TGF-α–expressing cornea. Real-time qRT-PCR revealed that Pitx2, RXRα, and DKK3 were downregulated more than 2-fold following 10 days of Dox induction compared with uninduced control (A). Canonical Wnt targets (Axin2 and Lef1) were also downregulated (B). Noncanonical Wnt ligands (Wnt4, Wnt5a, and Wnt9a) were upregulated (C). Noncanonical Wnt target, MLC-P, was weakly positive in uninduced corneal endothelium (D). Two days after induction, trabecular meshwork and nearby endothelial cells showed stronger signal (E). After 5 days of induction, positive cells can be seen in both the trabecular meshwork and corneal endothelium (F). After 20 days of induction, positive signal can be seen on both sides of the iridocorneal angle (G). st, stroma; arrows point to iridocorneal angle.

Figure 5

Noncanonical Wnt signal was activated in TGF-α–expressing cornea. Real-time qRT-PCR revealed that Pitx2, RXRα, and DKK3 were downregulated more than 2-fold following 10 days of Dox induction compared with uninduced control (A). Canonical Wnt targets (Axin2 and Lef1) were also downregulated (B). Noncanonical Wnt ligands (Wnt4, Wnt5a, and Wnt9a) were upregulated (C). Noncanonical Wnt target, MLC-P, was weakly positive in uninduced corneal endothelium (D). Two days after induction, trabecular meshwork and nearby endothelial cells showed stronger signal (E). After 5 days of induction, positive cells can be seen in both the trabecular meshwork and corneal endothelium (F). After 20 days of induction, positive signal can be seen on both sides of the iridocorneal angle (G). st, stroma; arrows point to iridocorneal angle.

Here we report a mouse model of secondary angle-closure glaucoma elicited by inducible expression of TGF-α in the corneal epithelium. This model shares some common features with DBA/2J mice.24 Both mice develop a progressive form of secondary angle-closure glaucoma that is associated with anterior synechiae formation, elevated IOP, and loss of retinal ganglion cells. The presence of endothelium on the surface of the trabecular meshwork and the peripheral iris in both mice closely resembles characteristics of the ICE syndrome in humans.

ICE was first proposed by Yanoff25 to unify common features of three different diseases: Iris–nevus syndrome, Chandler's syndrome, and essential iris atrophy. The fundamental abnormality among the diseases is the presence of the corneal endothelium on the peripheral iris. The presence of endothelium and abnormal basement membrane on the surface of the trabecular meshwork and peripheral iris lead to a decrease in outflow of aqueous humor and elevation of IOP. We observed some similarities between our mouse model and ICE syndrome in terms of endothelial changes. After 20 days of TGF-α expression, corneal endothelial cells extended over the iridocorneal angle, covering the surface of the peripheral iris. Elevation in IOP and retinal glial cell activation (GFAP staining) were confirmed in our mouse model.26 After 2 days of induction, we found increased staining of phosphorylated MLC in the corneal endothelium and trabecular meshwork, suggesting the activation of RhoA,27 which has also been demonstrated in the glaucomatous trabecular meshwork.28 Increased IOP was observed as early as 5 days after induction. At this time point, only partial peripheral anterior synechiae were observed. This suggests that increased phosphorylation of MLC in the trabecular meshwork may be responsible for IOP elevation and the endothelization of the anterior iris is a later event.

Even clinical observations clearly showed endothelial cells on the anterior iris29; however, we do not know if it is due to cell proliferation or/and to migration. Positive PCNA staining was observed in the experimental endothelium, whereas control endothelium remained negative, suggesting the role of endothelial cell proliferation. Notwithstanding, HRT II live image data suggested that the cell migration also occurred in effected eyes, because reduced cell density and loss of hexagonal cell shape were observed. So, which signaling pathways are responsible for the proliferation and migration of corneal endothelial cells? Corneal endothelial cells in culture are able to enter and complete the cell cycle upon loss of cell–cell contact with EDTA treatment and the presence of mitogens.30 Under this condition, canonical Wnt signaling is activated and cells lose the normal phenotype due to endothelial–mesenchymal transition.31 Corneal endothelial cells can also proliferate while keeping cell–cell contact. Edward et al.32 reported corneal endothelial cell proliferation in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) patients whose corneal endothelium expressed no functional neurofibromin 1 (NF1) protein. They reported similar features of anterior segment endothelization in NF-1 patients to those seen with ICE syndrome. Zhu et al.31 reported that activation of RhoA/ROCK signaling by knocking down p120 catenin was required for corneal endothelial cell proliferation without disrupting the adherens junction. Because loss of NF1 has been reported to activate RhoA-ROCK signaling,33 the pathways converge on RhoA/ROCK signaling. We also observed increased MLC-phosphorylation in our mouse model, which is a downstream target of RhoA/ROCK signaling, suggesting RhoA/ROCK activation in our model. If RhoA/ROCK activation is a prerequisite for corneal endothelial cell proliferation, RhoA/ROCK inhibitors, which have been demonstrated to lower the IOP through relaxing trabecular meshwork cells,34 could potentially be used to treat ICE syndrome or prevent endothelial cells from regrowing over the angle after filtering surgery.

Although RhoA/ROCK signaling may be important for corneal endothelial homeostasis, little is known regarding the underlying mechanism(s) or key upstream regulatory genes/pathways that activate RhoA/ROCK in pathologic conditions such as ICE or glaucoma. TGF-α is unlikely the direct cause for RhoA activation in our mouse model. We took another approach to address this issue. Reneker et al.10 found embryonic expression of TGF-α can cause the attachment of iris to the cornea, manifesting as a typical anterior segment defect. In an effort to uncover the underlying mechanism, we analyzed the expression of a panel of genes that have been reported to be critical in anterior segment formation in our adult mice. Among them, RXRα, FoxC1,35Pixt2,36 and DKK17 were downregulated by TGF-α. RXRα belongs to the Retinoid X receptor (RXR) family and forms a heterodimer with retinoic acid receptors (RARs). Genetic ablation of RXRα in mice results in severe eye defects including anterior segment dysgenesis.16Pixt2 encodes a homeodomain transcription factor that starts expression first in neural crest of the anterior segment at embryonic day (E) 9.5.36,37 Heterozygous mutations in human Pitx2 result in Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome, featuring anterior segment dysmorphogenesis and a high risk for glaucoma.38 Tissue-specific knockout of Pitx2 in neural crest recapitulates many ocular features of human mutations, including anterior segment dysgenesis.37FoxC1, a member of the forkhead family of transcription factors, also plays important roles in ocular morphogenesis.12 Gage and Zacharias21 proposed that retinoic acid, Pitx2/FoxC1, and DKKs play a critical role during anterior segment development by suppressing canonical Wnt signaling, so we analyzed the expression of canonical Wnt targets. Because the expression levels of RXRα, Pitx2, FoxC1, and DKK3 were downregulated in our samples, we expected canonical Wnt signaling targets (Axin2 and Lef1) to be upregulated. To our surprise, they were downregulated. When we looked at the Wnt ligand expression, Wnt4 and Wnt5a, the most abundant Wnt ligands in our sample, were upregulated. They are also the two major noncanonical Wnt ligands.39,40 The feature of noncanonical Wnt signaling is the activation of RhoA/ROCK signaling and repressing canonical Wnt signaling.41,42 We demonstrated the upregulation of noncanonical ligands, RhoA/ROCK activation, and downregulation of canonical Wnt targets. All suggested the activation of noncanonical Wnt signaling, thus, noncanonical Wnt signaling is a potential mechanism for RhoA/ROCK activation in affected eyes. More loss-of-function studies, such as knocking down noncanonical Wnt receptor Ror2,43 are necessary to verify the role of noncanonical Wnt signaling in our mouse model.

In summary, we generated a mouse model that recapitulates some features of ICE syndrome. In this model, anterior segment morphology changes are associated with downregulation of ASD gene expression and the activation of noncanonical Wnt signaling. Currently, we do not know how TGF-α drives the expression of noncanonical Wnt ligands. We speculate that it may interfere with retinoic acid signaling,44 triggering a cascade of events that leads to the upregulation of noncanonical Wnt ligands. More studies are needed to investigate the role of retinoic acid and noncanonical Wnt signaling in the pathogenesis of ICE syndrome.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mindy Call and Katy Fischesser for proofreading the manuscript.

Supported in part by National Eye Institute/National Institutes of Health Grants EY21501 (C-YL) and EY013755 (WW-YK); Research to Prevent Blindness; Ohio Lions Eye Research Foundation; National Science Council (Taiwan) Grant 1012314B182A056MY3; and Grant CMRPG3A1291 from Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Linko (L-KY).

Footnotes

4These authors contributed equally to the work presented here and should therefore be regarded as equivalent authors.

Overexpression of TGF-α in adult corneal epithelium caused limbal epithelial hyperplasia and iridocorneal angle closure. There were two major differences between control (A) and TGF-α–expressing eyes (B) as revealed by H&E staining, the thickness of limbal epithelium and anatomic configuration of the iris (B). The thickness of the limbal epithelium was dramatically increased and the iris positioned in a flat plane in experimental eyes. High magnification showed massive limbal epithelial tissue in the experimental eye (D) as compared with the control eye (C). Control eye (E) had a normal iridocorneal angle, whereas extra tissue was clearly visible in the closed angle of the TGF-α–expressing eye (F).

Figure 2

Overexpression of TGF-α in adult corneal epithelium caused limbal epithelial hyperplasia and iridocorneal angle closure. There were two major differences between control (A) and TGF-α–expressing eyes (B) as revealed by H&E staining, the thickness of limbal epithelium and anatomic configuration of the iris (B). The thickness of the limbal epithelium was dramatically increased and the iris positioned in a flat plane in experimental eyes. High magnification showed massive limbal epithelial tissue in the experimental eye (D) as compared with the control eye (C). Control eye (E) had a normal iridocorneal angle, whereas extra tissue was clearly visible in the closed angle of the TGF-α–expressing eye (F).

TGF-α expression led to elevated IOP, Müller glial cell activation, and retinal ganglion cell loss (A), IOP was measured in single- and double-transgenic mice before Dox induction and recorded as day 0. After 5, 10, and 20 days of Dox induction, IOP values of single-transgenic mice were steady during the course of induction, whereas IOP values of double-transgenic mice increased steadily and significantly. The data were collected from four mice of each group. TGF-α expression led to retinal ganglion cell loss (B, C). In control mice (B), the retinal ganglion cell layer consisted of one to two layers of well-organized cells (arrow). After 20 days of TGF-α expression, a single layer of sparse ganglion cells was evident (C). Immunoreactivity for GFAP in the retina revealed progressive activation of Müller glial cells by TGF-α expression (D–G). Before Dox induction (D), GFAP was localized in the nerve fibers and ganglion cell layer. After 2 days of induction (E), GFAP-positive signals were visible in all layers of the retina. After 5 days of induction (F), strong immunoreactivity was found in nerve fiber, ganglion cell layers, and in elongated cells extending across the whole section of the retina. The signal intensified after 20 days of induction (G).

Figure 3

TGF-α expression led to elevated IOP, Müller glial cell activation, and retinal ganglion cell loss (A), IOP was measured in single- and double-transgenic mice before Dox induction and recorded as day 0. After 5, 10, and 20 days of Dox induction, IOP values of single-transgenic mice were steady during the course of induction, whereas IOP values of double-transgenic mice increased steadily and significantly. The data were collected from four mice of each group. TGF-α expression led to retinal ganglion cell loss (B, C). In control mice (B), the retinal ganglion cell layer consisted of one to two layers of well-organized cells (arrow). After 20 days of TGF-α expression, a single layer of sparse ganglion cells was evident (C). Immunoreactivity for GFAP in the retina revealed progressive activation of Müller glial cells by TGF-α expression (D–G). Before Dox induction (D), GFAP was localized in the nerve fibers and ganglion cell layer. After 2 days of induction (E), GFAP-positive signals were visible in all layers of the retina. After 5 days of induction (F), strong immunoreactivity was found in nerve fiber, ganglion cell layers, and in elongated cells extending across the whole section of the retina. The signal intensified after 20 days of induction (G).

TGF-α expression led to corneal endothelial abnormality. N-Cadherin is the marker to track corneal endothelium. After 2 days of induction, corneal endothelium and trabecular meshwork were positive (A, B). After 5 days of induction, only the endothelium was positive (C). After 20 days of induction, N-cadherin–positive cells were also visible on the anterior iris, forming a continuous cell layer blocking the iridocorneal angle (arrow in [D]). Cell proliferation marker PCNA was positive in the corneal epithelium (E–H). Before induction, it was negative on corneal stroma and iris (E). Two to 5 days after induction, positive cells were also visible in the stroma (F, G). Twenty days after induction, both the corneal endothelium and peripheral iris were positive (H). Excess TGF-α changed the cell morphology and reduced cell density of the corneal endothelium. Live images of the corneal endothelium were taken by HRT II Rostock cornea module. Corneal endothelial cells mostly exhibited a hexagonal shape in untreated mice (I), but assumed diffuse abnormality with pleomorphism in size and shape in the treated mice (J). In addition, the endothelial cell density of Dox-treated mice reduced by 19.4% as compared with the nontreated mice (from 2736 ± 28 cells/mm2 to 2204 ± 43 cells/mm2).

Figure 4

TGF-α expression led to corneal endothelial abnormality. N-Cadherin is the marker to track corneal endothelium. After 2 days of induction, corneal endothelium and trabecular meshwork were positive (A, B). After 5 days of induction, only the endothelium was positive (C). After 20 days of induction, N-cadherin–positive cells were also visible on the anterior iris, forming a continuous cell layer blocking the iridocorneal angle (arrow in [D]). Cell proliferation marker PCNA was positive in the corneal epithelium (E–H). Before induction, it was negative on corneal stroma and iris (E). Two to 5 days after induction, positive cells were also visible in the stroma (F, G). Twenty days after induction, both the corneal endothelium and peripheral iris were positive (H). Excess TGF-α changed the cell morphology and reduced cell density of the corneal endothelium. Live images of the corneal endothelium were taken by HRT II Rostock cornea module. Corneal endothelial cells mostly exhibited a hexagonal shape in untreated mice (I), but assumed diffuse abnormality with pleomorphism in size and shape in the treated mice (J). In addition, the endothelial cell density of Dox-treated mice reduced by 19.4% as compared with the nontreated mice (from 2736 ± 28 cells/mm2 to 2204 ± 43 cells/mm2).

Noncanonical Wnt signal was activated in TGF-α–expressing cornea. Real-time qRT-PCR revealed that Pitx2, RXRα, and DKK3 were downregulated more than 2-fold following 10 days of Dox induction compared with uninduced control (A). Canonical Wnt targets (Axin2 and Lef1) were also downregulated (B). Noncanonical Wnt ligands (Wnt4, Wnt5a, and Wnt9a) were upregulated (C). Noncanonical Wnt target, MLC-P, was weakly positive in uninduced corneal endothelium (D). Two days after induction, trabecular meshwork and nearby endothelial cells showed stronger signal (E). After 5 days of induction, positive cells can be seen in both the trabecular meshwork and corneal endothelium (F). After 20 days of induction, positive signal can be seen on both sides of the iridocorneal angle (G). st, stroma; arrows point to iridocorneal angle.

Figure 5

Noncanonical Wnt signal was activated in TGF-α–expressing cornea. Real-time qRT-PCR revealed that Pitx2, RXRα, and DKK3 were downregulated more than 2-fold following 10 days of Dox induction compared with uninduced control (A). Canonical Wnt targets (Axin2 and Lef1) were also downregulated (B). Noncanonical Wnt ligands (Wnt4, Wnt5a, and Wnt9a) were upregulated (C). Noncanonical Wnt target, MLC-P, was weakly positive in uninduced corneal endothelium (D). Two days after induction, trabecular meshwork and nearby endothelial cells showed stronger signal (E). After 5 days of induction, positive cells can be seen in both the trabecular meshwork and corneal endothelium (F). After 20 days of induction, positive signal can be seen on both sides of the iridocorneal angle (G). st, stroma; arrows point to iridocorneal angle.