maybe because its a republican party pathetic abuse of numbers. ones in the chart and those left out.

Mine were chart facts created by bi-partisan no horse in the race groups. Yours was just a joke but now that I know you get all your news from Drudge, thats to be expected.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach|

All kinds of people vote. Not enough of those people think highly enough of Trump to make him President but all kinds of people vote.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger

So, if they were polling better than Trump and the primary goal was to prevent Hillary from becoming POTUS, perhaps it would have been a better strategic decision to nominate someone who actually had a chance of beating her and preventing that than nominating Donald Trump.

geeeezz your embrassing yourselfs. Only thing you guys can find is charts made by professional staffs of Republicans?

You're right, the increase in gas and food prices and the shrinking labor pool are all made up by the Repubs.

You might want to the the cashiers that when they take my money for food and gas.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach|

All kinds of people vote. Not enough of those people think highly enough of Trump to make him President but all kinds of people vote.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger

So, if they were polling better than Trump and the primary goal was to prevent Hillary from becoming POTUS, perhaps it would have been a better strategic decision to nominate someone who actually had a chance of beating her and preventing that than nominating Donald Trump.

All kinds of people vote. Not enough of those people think highly enough of Trump to make him President but all kinds of people vote.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger

So, if they were polling better than Trump and the primary goal was to prevent Hillary from becoming POTUS, perhaps it would have been a better strategic decision to nominate someone who actually had a chance of beating her and preventing that than nominating Donald Trump.

Americans must be wondering how much more of this “recovery” they can afford. New figures from the Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey, compiled by Sentier Research, show that the typical American household’s real (inflation-adjusted) income has actually dropped 5.7 percent during the Obama “recovery.” Using constant 2012 dollars (to adjust for inflation), the median annual income of American households was $53,718 as of June 2009, the last month of the recession. Now, after 38 months of this “recovery,” it has fallen to $50,678 — a drop of $3,040 per household.

Yet it gets worse. Amazingly, incomes have dropped even more during the “recovery” than they did during the recession. In fact, they’ve dropped more than twice as much as they did during the recession. From the start to the end of the recession, the real median income of American households fell $1,413, or 2.6 percent. From the end of the recession to the present day, it has dropped $3,040, or 5.7 percent. This begs the question: What kind of “recovery” compares unfavorably with the recession from which it’s ostensibly recovering?

This issue is real, but it's not anything that a President is likely to impact.

Corporations are increasingly focused on fattening the wallets of the senior executives, and less on both stockholders and, especially, employees. Wages are flat or pathetic, despite booming profits and swelling corporate coffers.

I have no idea what the fix is for that, but even if there is one, I doubt Romney would pursue it.

You're right, the increase in gas and food prices and the shrinking labor pool are all made up by the Repubs.

Good golly! Gas and food cost more than 4 years ago? This is probably the first time in history prices have risen in a 4-year period. My grandpa told me how he used to be able to go to the movies for a nickel and have enough left over for a sodey-pop. Now a movie is $10. Grrrr! Obama!

__________________

Quote:

Reporter: "I guess the question is: Why should Americans trust you when you accuse the information they receive as being fake, when you're providing information that is not accurate?"

TRUMP: "Well, I was given that information. I was, actually, I've seen that information around.