Comments for The ISSM Bloghttps://issmstudents.wordpress.com
Preparing the next generation to follow in the footsteps of the best of generationsFri, 28 Dec 2012 05:57:40 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/Comment on It’s Only Sunnah Bro!!! by Nur Bint Hassanhttps://issmstudents.wordpress.com/2011/05/02/its-only-sunnah-bro/#comment-282
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 05:57:40 +0000http://issmstudents.wordpress.com/?p=863#comment-282Ma shaa Allah, JazakhAllah Khairan for this beneficial post..
]]>Comment on The Return of the Pied Piper by The Studenthttps://issmstudents.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/the-return-of-the-pied-piper/#comment-250
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:27:12 +0000http://issmstudents.wordpress.com/?p=217#comment-250excellent. a breath of fresh air. Jazak Allah khair.
]]>Comment on It’s Only Sunnah Bro!!! by mzia8https://issmstudents.wordpress.com/2011/05/02/its-only-sunnah-bro/#comment-245
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:35:28 +0000http://issmstudents.wordpress.com/?p=863#comment-245Brilliant article a very good read..I especially like the part about how we’ve lost our identity.
]]>Comment on Facebook or Fitnahbook? by arihttps://issmstudents.wordpress.com/2009/11/19/facebook-or-fitnahbook/#comment-237
Sun, 10 Apr 2011 11:57:11 +0000http://issmstudents.wordpress.com/?p=363#comment-237hi all,
the picture may be funny but none of the muslims can disagree with the meaning in it. quran/islam has menmtioned hijab just to protect women from men. if you do not see you do not lust. but is the quran/islam not for men ? can it not stop men from abusing women ? why ? it could prescribe something that could tame the lust in men. why did it not ? because my friends, the holy quran was written by a MAN. women of any religion is not a non living lolypop. they are human beings. they also like men and men do to women. it’s science. quran has not mentioned hijab for a rose. flies come to rose and thus the system moves on this planet. start avoiding hijab and follow the truth. a suppressed truth sharper than the dagger. it may cut you even.
]]>Comment on Jack “The Paki-Basher” Straw by anonymoushttps://issmstudents.wordpress.com/2011/01/10/jack-the-paki-basher-straw/#comment-222
Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:35:58 +0000http://issmstudents.wordpress.com/?p=799#comment-222http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/jack-straws-brother-found-guilty-of-indecent-assault-on-girl-16-698881.html#Scene_1

maybe jack straw needs to look closer to home and ask himself questions before asking questions of others

]]>Comment on Jack “The Paki-Basher” Straw by anonymoushttps://issmstudents.wordpress.com/2011/01/10/jack-the-paki-basher-straw/#comment-220
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 01:53:03 +0000http://issmstudents.wordpress.com/?p=799#comment-220Jack straw’s comment is absolutely disgraceful. Again this clearly shows their agenda to demonise the Muslims. He may have said pakistani but only because there was no way he could have said Muslim and got away with it with such little fuss. Throughout the ‘debate’ they mention Pakistani and Muslim communities interchangeably highlighting their main agenda.

Its ridiculous to say ‘we are going to solve the problem of child grooming by questioning the minority of pakistanis, which make up 0.3% (or whatever the figure for UK is) of offenders of this crime, about what are the causes for the lead up to this crime.’
As stated by the Det Sgt in ths video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Zj7HBkLKco&feature=related they would have missed 80% of the offenders had they been looking for pakistanis committing this crime.

Im going to exercise my ‘freedom of speech’ and say the cause of this is the British themselves, you wanted integration you got it, they’re doing just as you are. I can prove this, you just have to look at the british soldiers who are fighting for this country and represent everything british who are raping the young girls and women in iraq and afghanistan. That combined with the alarming figures of white male rapists in this country leads to a more justified conclusion that the problem is with the white people themselves and it has something to do with their culture and how they perceive women. Douglas Murray would have been more correct in saying it is endemic in the white community rather than suggesting it is endemic in the pakistanis and then trying to backtrack

]]>Comment on Jack “The Paki-Basher” Straw by Random Pakihttps://issmstudents.wordpress.com/2011/01/10/jack-the-paki-basher-straw/#comment-219
Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:25:17 +0000http://issmstudents.wordpress.com/?p=799#comment-219I wonder how long it’ll take society will deem it acceptable for a boxers to add, “Paki-basher” or even the increasingly popular “Muslim Hunter” to their credentials.
]]>Comment on Moderates: The Barelwi Paradox by Jarrarhttps://issmstudents.wordpress.com/2011/01/05/moderates-the-barelwi-paradox/#comment-218
Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:00:59 +0000http://issmstudents.wordpress.com/?p=787#comment-218This is exactly what came to my mind when I heard of the ‘firqa’ from which the bodyguard belonged.

What now, will the Brelvis of the UK now distance themselves from the Brelvi Asassin for ‘defending’ Islam and the Prophet, especially since their Ulema have fully backed him?

Will they put their lucrative but fast drying up PVE funding and seat at(under) theie masters table at risk by openly supporting their own Ulema?

Problems Problems, money or principles, we will see which way the they swing.

Also this is a very important and almost non-sectarian point.

When they the christian US and NATO drop bombs from 40’000 feet they dont differentiate between Brelvis, Deobandis, Salafis, and Wahabis.

They kill, women and children indiscriminatley because they are brown, muslim and in the wrong part of the earth.

Where is the outrage and three days of mourning for the victims of Drone Terrorism?

]]>Comment on British Documentaries, Neocon Discrepancies (Part 2) – Corporal Punishments a Muslim Monopoly? by issmstudentshttps://issmstudents.wordpress.com/2010/11/28/british-documentaries-neocon-discrepancies-part-2-%e2%80%93-corporeal-punishments-a-muslim-monopoly/#comment-201
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:40:33 +0000http://issmstudents.wordpress.com/?p=695#comment-201Thank you for taking the time to comment.

The point you make is true, but I’m afraid it may fall upon deaf ears, especially, when lies, spin and deception has already crystalised the basis for misinformed judgments on various news outlets and blogs.

The purpose of highlighting it in other faiths, is to demonstrate the clear and inherent bias in Ware, who interviewed neocon compliant people to achieve an end, which was to demonise Islam.

Quite clearly, these punishments, and far worse punishments can be found in the New Testament, Torah and Talmud, and as shown above in the case of Orthodox Jewish schools, religious laws are taught to students. Why not expose them? Jewish extremism exists; We have Jewish citizens of the UK going to Israel and fighting on illegally invaded land – Britain is breaking International Law. Is this not extremism? Assert a right to return based on Biblical texts? Subject an entire people to collective punishment, again contravening International Law, again based on the right to return based on Biblical texts?

What is there to say this isnt influencing their decision to join the Israeli Defence Farce, and participate in the bull-dozering of Palestinian homes and be a part of war machine engaged in gross Human Rights violations?

There is a double standard taking place here. Ware and the BBC need to be held accountable for their blantant bias and spin.

But that is to be expected when the BBC Panorama program tried pass the of show as serious journalism. Not to take away any credit from the in-depth research the author has obviously endured – but perhaps there is a simpler rebuttal.

Comprehension.

Whilst at school I was taught many subjects (math, science, business, law etc) and the detail some of the topics delved into made it difficult for me to always understand what I was actually being taught. Diagrams, images and charts were used to assist in clarifying such points.

No subject can be more difficult to understand than that of corporeal punishments.
So necessarily diagrams will be used to explain the finer details – so that no injustice is perceived in the punishment. An amputation too high up will cause immeasurable suffering; similarly one too far down will be taking more than what was prescribed – an injustice.

Teaching these is NOT akin to implementing them.

We learn about the World Wars and the concentration camps in vivid detail.
Does that imply we will go out and start erecting concentration camps and begin World Wars?
The images used are to further illustrate a difficult point or to enhance one – and that’s exactly what they were being used for in the Saudi text books.

We do NOT need to apologise or even look for examples of cruel punishments in other faiths to defend our stance.

It is not necessary.

If people cannot comprehend the difference between *Teaching* and *Conditioning* then that is an insurmountable obstacle that no amount of rebutting can overcome.