Murder is wrong, and I find it cowardly for any person to kill a baby that can't even say anything or defend for himself.
Animals differ from humans. Most domestic animals that are severely injured are euthanize. Some can be saved, but plenty of them do not have a great chance of surviving. Animals do not have morals like human beings. Animals are vicious, killers, immodest, and wild. So to euthanize an animal would not result in a crime being made, not unless the animal was perfectly fine, or if the animal belonged to someone and was euthanize without the owner's consent.

It would still be interfering with the creation of a human being. Humans are of more value than any animal. To interfere with the life of human being, would be attempted murder, and to kill the human is murder. There are consequences for those actions.

So to euthanize an animal would not result in a crime being made, not unless the animal was perfectly fine, or if the animal belonged to someone and was euthanize without the owner's consent.

With other words, if you euthanize an animal that is perfectly fine, this is murder?
I assume you should tell this to the people who work at slaughterhouses and who therefore are murders, as anuimals slaughtered are usually perfectly fine ;)

Like so many idiots before you, you are inexplicably classifying a non-sentient lump of cell matter as a human being. Is the presence of a mind, then, entirely superfluous to the human identity? I disagree; in fact, I consider the mind the only aspect of humanity that has any inherent value.

Murder is wrong, and I find it cowardly for any person to kill a baby that can't even say anything or defend for himself

And most people would agree with you. NO ONE is for murdering babies. Well, except for a friend of mine, but she's spent time in an institution and has many mental problems.

Animals differ from humans. Most domestic animals that are severely injured are euthanize. Some can be saved, but plenty of them do not have a great chance of surviving.

What does this have to do with anything?

Animals do not have morals like human beings. Animals are vicious, killers, immodest, and wild.

"Immodest" was my favorite.

So to euthanize an animal would not result in a crime being made, not unless the animal was perfectly fine, or if the animal belonged to someone and was euthanize without the owner's consent

I'm pretty sure it's illegal to kill an animal for no reason, even if you have the consent of the owner.

It would still be interfering with the creation of a human being. Humans are of more value than any animal. To interfere with the life of human being, would be attempted murder, and to kill the human is murder. There are consequences for those actions

"Murder is wrong, and I find it cowardly for any person to kill a baby that can't even say anything or defend for himself."

It's not a baby.

"Animals differ from humans."

How so? List all of the biological differences that separate humans from animals.

"Most domestic animals that are severely injured are euthanize. Some can be saved, but plenty of them do not have a great chance of surviving. Animals do not have morals like human beings. Animals are vicious, killers, immodest, and wild. So to euthanize an animal would not result in a crime being made, not unless the animal was perfectly fine, or if the animal belonged to someone and was euthanize without the owner's consent."

Was there supposed to be something in there that showed why humans are something unique and distinct from animals?

"It would still be interfering with the creation of a human being."

Have you any idea how many things do that naturally? Only about 60% or so of all fertilized eggs are viable you know. The rest spontaneously abort due to genetic quirks, abnormal division, unsuccessful implantation and so on.

"Humans are of more value than any animal."

Just as a fun philosophical question I'd like to ask you why humans have more intrinsic value than another animal?

"To interfere with the life of human being, would be attempted murder, and to kill the human is murder. There are consequences for those actions."

Yes. To kill a human is, in most cases, illegal. Removing what is, for all practical purposes, a parasite is not illegal.

Removing a small cluster of cells before it has any kind consciousness or developed nervous system, and cannot suffer is different than forcing a woman who perhaps cannot/barely care for herself to have to care for a child too.

That's kind of funny, because I was watching a program with my brother on Animal Planet I think, and it was going down a top-10 list of "dangerous cats." The list had cougars, tigers..and #1 was - you guessed it - a house cat. Something about its diet including anything it can kill/catch lol

You better not ever come to Australia - it is full of vicious, immodest, man-eating, killer Koala's. But they do us a huge favour - they keep eating those gum leaves that clutter p the country so much.