To Edmé Jacques Genet

[The resolve] of Congress of the 10 October, [that]2 you have inserted in your No. 62 is another Forgery.3 It has internal Marks of it enough.

1. Congress are not so much allarmed. They know the Ennemy have not the Power, tho
they very well know they have the Will to do the Mischief.

2. Congress, would never recommend the building of such Hutts. There are Houses enough
in the Country to receive the Inhabitants of the Towns, even in Case of such an Extremity.

3. Congress would never recommend the Burning the Houses of the Tories. They would
sooner banish or Harry them and confiscate their Houses to carry on the War.

[A simple glance is sufficient] to any Man who knows [the country]4 and the Congress to perceive Marks of the Beast, in such ridiculous Fictions. Yet
they impose of British Mobs, Ministers and Members of Parliament.5

[signed] John Adams

RC (CLjC). This letter was translated into French and printed in Affaires de l'Angleterre et de l'Amérique (“Lettres,” vol. 13, cahier 63, p. lxxxiii). Fire damage at the top of the page has
resulted in the loss of the salutation, dateline, and several words. As a result,
except for the salutation which is not reproduced in Affaires, the dateline and other missing portions have been supplied in brackets by reconstructing
the English text from the French translation in Affaires.

3. Printed on pages xxii and xxiii of cahier 62, the fictitious resolve noted an expected
final British attempt at the destruction of American towns and directed Americans
living in threatened areas to build huts at thirty miles distance and, if the attack
came, to destroy all tory property. In the reply to this letter and his apology for
being duped (cahier 63, lxxx–lxxxii), Genet gave as the source for the resolution
a New York gazette, probably Rivington's Royal Gazette because the Courier de l'Europe of 22 Dec., cited in Genet's apology, contains the “resolve” of 10 Oct., the congress'
countermanifesto of 30 Oct., and a reply to the latter by a loyalist writer; and all
appeared under a heading that implied they were from the Royal Gazette of 18 Nov. The London Chronicle of 17–19 Dec. carried the same pieces with the same heading. The countermanifesto
and the answer were printed in the Royal Gazette of 18 Nov., but the spurious resolve was not, nor did it appear in the other paper,
Hugh Gaines' New York Gazette and Weekly Mercury. The resolve, therefore, was probably taken by Genet from an English newspaper that
cited Rivington and was fabricated in England, not America. Further evidence of the
resolve's wide circulation in Europe and its evident authenticity in the minds of
those who read it can be seen in its appearance in the Gazette de Leide of 5 Jan.

5. In this sentence JA's probable meaning is obscured by his use of “impose of.” The “of” may have been
an inadvertence for “on,” but he meant “to obtrude or 'put' (a thing) upon (a person) by false representations; to palm or pass off” (OED). JA means that an effort is being made to impose false rumors or statements on the British
people and politicians regarding the policy of the congress on the conduct of the
war. Genet's French translation of the paragraph in Affaires is clearer than the sentence as JA wrote it. It reads: “Cependant elles reussissent a merveille pour tromper le vulgaire
Anglois, les Ministres et les Membres du Parlement.” Translation: Yet they succeed
to perfection in deceiving the British mob, ministers, and members of Parliament.