Thanks, Ryan. Now everybody's not angry with me.
Well, Eli still is, but that's nothing new.
Neil T
(I'm just kidding, Eli.)
On 12/07/2011 11:52 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> I've pushed a temporary fix to the dist-specs, and meta/check-dists now
> runs without errors. Hopefully the nightly builds will be back tomorrow.
> The underlying problem remains, though.
>> Ryan
>>> On 12/07/2011 03:58 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>>>> Please bring back the nightly build.
>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2011, at 5:41 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
>>>>> I asked for someone to do something to give us more time two days ago.
>>>>>> Robby
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Ryan Culpepper<ryan at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
>>>> On 12/05/2011 12:35 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> The icons collection has some issues that need to be resolved:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * It breaks the dependencies. The error is:
>>>>>>>>>> unsatisfied dependency for "dr-bin":
>>>>> "racket/collects/icons/main.rkt" (in:
>>>>> "racket/collects/drracket/compiled/syncheck-drracket-button_rkt.dep"
>>>>> ...)
>>>>>>>>>> This means that the DrRacket distribution requires "icons/main.rkt",
>>>>> and that's missing from the distribution.
>>>>>>>>>> The reason it's missing is that Matthew tried to fix the more
>>>>> serious problem that was there before: the new icons requires
>>>>> `slideshow' and `texpict' (via `unstable/gui/pict'), and since
>>>>> DrRacket uses it, it now depends on these too.
>>>>>>>>>> Potential ways to resolve it:
>>>>>>>>>> 1. Decide that it's fine to make slideshow and texpict required for
>>>>> drracket.
>>>>>>>>>> 2. Dump the idea of making sense and stop making these tests.
>>>>>>>>>> 3. Avoid the new dependency, and make the code not require that.
>>>>> Potentially do that by splitting the code into a part that
>>>>> drracket can use, and a part that is not needed.
>>>>>>>>>>>> The nightly builds have now been failing for seven days. I assume it's
>>>> because of this dist-spec issue.
>>>>>>>> I vote we do #1 to get the nightly builds working again immediately.
>>>> When
>>>> the parties involved figure out a long-term solution, we can undo the
>>>> dist-spec change.
>>>>>>>> It would also be nice if the particular distributions that did
>>>> succeed in
>>>> the nightly builds were made available. I assume that the
>>>> "plt-everything"
>>>> distribution (or whatever it's called) has been succeeding, and that
>>>> only a
>>>> lesser-used distribution is preventing any updates.
>>>>>>>> Ryan
>>>>>>>> _________________________________________________
>>>> For list-related administrative tasks:
>>>>http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev>>>>>> _________________________________________________
>>> For list-related administrative tasks:
>>>http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev>> _________________________________________________
> For list-related administrative tasks:
>http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev