Philip JÃ€genstedt said:
> How about content-fit and content-position?
Wrt suggestions for better names for 'image-fit' and 'image-position'.
The CSS WG did consider this alternative when we brainstormed names; as I recall, this was rejected at that point because the property is not intended to generalize to all content, but rather applies only to replaced content.
Since this is targeted to graphics, maybe
gfx-fit, gfx-position?
Or, less cryptically, graphics-fit, graphics-position?
Best,
Melinda