Please accept this letter as a complaint of employment discrimination based on gender by Alice Bennett. Please also accept this letter as an appearance by Marcia Robinson of Auburn University Legal Services on behalf of Mrs. Alice Bennett. On January 5, Mrs. Bennett started working at Rikards-Hayley, an investment banking firm located at 121 Centre St., New York, New York. Her first job was in training and development, where she received nothing but superior evaluation from her supervisors. At precisely two years ago, she was promoted to acting manager of the department. As acting manager she received superior evaluation. Five months into the job Mrs. Bennett was notified that the company was going to fill the manager position and she applied for the position. She was told by her supervisor, Darren Blackwood, that management liked her but she did not quite fit the image they were seeking. She needed to lose weight and change her attitude towards he male employees. She was told that she was “too assertive.” Mrs. Bennett was not hired as manager; instead the company hired Martina Yardley. After Mrs. Yardley was hired, Mrs. Bennett claimed she was made miserable. Yardley criticized her work constantly and also made comments about her appearance. Two months ago Mrs. Bennett was fired. When male employees were terminated from Rikards-Hayley, they commonly receive severance package consisting of one year’s salary; Bennett’s severance package contained on six months’ salary. As a result of her treatment at work, Bennett claims she suffered physically and emotionally. To date her medical bills have totaled $2500. She has also been unable to find work; she earned $150,000 before she was terminated. Age discrimination involves treating someone less favorably because of his age. The Age...

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

...had to do with criminal investigation. As I got older, I started to understand more things and the shows that actually grasped my attention were CSI and First 48. I love watching these shows because I can already figure out what is going to happen before the episode is already over. I put myself in the situation of the investigators in the TV shows and think of what I would actually do. My dad used to work in the department of CSI for the Texas police Department so I have some background knowledge and terminology of what is going on. I frequently asked questions and I felt like I somewhat knew the life of a crime scene investigator. They get calls in the middle of the night and they have to go out to the scene.It is a very stressful and traumitizing job.When it comes down to the two shows of First 48 and CSI, they deal with crimes that involve murders and have investigation element.
CSI is full of trained investigators trying to examine the evidence. They find the missing pieces that will solve the case.“A criminal investigator is a person who conducts investigations for criminalcases. This person is responsible for collecting and assessing evidence for a case to pinpoint guilty parties. If you have ever watched an episode of CSI, you have seen criminal
Basic Criminal Investigation 2
investigators in action. The ones in the real world do roughly...

...
Jenetta M. Hills
CriminalJustice
September 13, 2013
In this essay, I am going to discuss; duties, responsibilities and qualifications for both
Probation and Parole Officers. I will go into details about what a Probation and Parole Officer
for both serve juveniles and adults. I will go into great detail for both Probation and Parole
Officers. I choose this career particularly because; I’m interested in coming becoming a Parole
Officer. Also, in this paper, I will give examples of crimes that cause people to be on probation
and parole. I’m also going to discuss the pro and cons for both Probation and Parole Officers.
You will learn many interesting things about Probation and Parole.
Parole and probation officers are individuals that supervise offenders who have been sentenced
to non-custodial sanctions or those released from incarceration. There are some similarities
between the two positions but there are also some large differences. (Cited) http://online.ccj.pdx.edu/ccj-careers-resources/criminal-justice-resources/research/the-differences-between-parole-officers-and-probation-officers One of the largest
differences are who the officers supervise. My career goal is to become a Parole Officer. Both of
these careers deal with people of all walks of life. To become a Social Worker or Parole Officer,
you must like to deal with people of different calibers. When, it comes to dealing with...

...﻿
CriminalJustice Trends
CJA/484 CriminalJustice Administration Capstone
October 1, 2014
Fred Olguin
CriminalJustice Trends
In today’s society the use of technology, terrorism, and organized crime has been undoubtedly a future trend therefore, the criminaljustice system remains to be an essential safeguard for society globally. Evolving changes in technology, terrorism, and organized crime has been complex in the early years of the twenty-first century, which requires the criminaljustice system to take drastic steps to prevent such crimes.
Society and politicians are demanding legal responsibility, protection, and public safety therefore several law enforcement agencies are implementing computer services for law enforcement management systems. Further training has been implemented for law enforcement units to correctly respond to such criminal occurrences. Because law enforcement officials are being held accountable for the safety of society law enforcement officials must engage in tactical preparation, must have a neighborhood rapport, and more technologically advanced in terms of computer management and rapid deployment systems. Countless of individuals are being incarcerated therefore crime rates are diminishing in comparison to earlier decades. However, the disputes are consistent with the...

...﻿
Crime and the CriminalJustice System
Monica Mois
Introduction to CriminalJustice/CJS/201
November 10, 2014
Christle Sheppard Southall
CriminalJustice System
According to the University of Phoenix CJi Interactive activities (2014), the definition of a crime is “a conduct in violation of the criminal laws of the state, the federal government, or a local jurisdiction, for which there is no legally acceptable justification or excuse”. It is a complex and very difficult definition to agree upon because there are many points of view and controversies in defining what crime is. From a psychological standpoint, it suggest that the crime is a way of expressing the inability of an individual to follow the social norm. The psychological view does not care about the traditional elements of crime. When one individual doesn’t respond appropriately or effectively to the environmentally demands, then the individual is a criminal or maladaptive. The sociological standpoint, suggests that the concept of crime should include many behaviors that are not well defined by laws or the political process. From its sociological point of view, crime is an act that is antisocial and needs to be repressed to maintain society.
There are two most common models most common models of how society determines which acts are criminal. One is the crime-control model, which is...

...is one of the issues we face in society, the US is a diverse country but this difference can affect our justice and administration and how it’s practiced.
Courts often seek for alternatives when sentencing defendants convicted of hate crimes. Many times individuals who commit a crime for the first time act out of ignorance or low self-esteem when they commit hate crimes. Many juveniles commit crimes such as burning crosses and scrawling offensive graffiti on public buildings which are considered to be hate crimes against religion and society. Many of these individuals are required to take diversion courses which teach them about their behavior, these courses cover racism, anti-Semitism and civil rights laws, offenders by the end of the course should have an understanding of why their behaviors are considered discriminatory and inappropriate.
According to the non-profit Sentencing Project racial inequalities exist during sentencing proceedings. There was a research conducted by this group regarding cultural inequalities in criminal sentencing. An interesting fact of this research was the finding of how a criminalcase decision is influenced through racial aspects. For instance, juries in some states tend to recommend the death penalty for homicide defendants accused of killing a white person. In trials, many times prosecutors seek the death penalty in those racial cases that involve...

...to the same opportunities. The failure to achieve these goals through the socially acceptable way drives people to crime. Provision of opportunities as one of the core strategies addresses one of the major causes of crime according to the strain theory. Community mobilization together with social change and development also fill the opportunity void that give rise to delinquency. Social strain theory proposed by Merton best addresses the core strategies adopted by the National Gang Center.
Question two
Inaccurate information from the media on the identification of gangs is often erroneous and not to be relied on. Criminal behavior varies from place to place, and the generalities provided by the media are misguiding. The most dependable source of information on gang activities in the community is the local law enforcement agencies. Gang activities usually criminal in nature and, therefore, the police officers would provide the most reliable information. The stereotypes presented by the media should be ignored (NGC, 2014). They sometimes provide a crucial link, but most of the times they vilify innocent civilians carrying out their daily activities.
Question three
I would allocate 50 % to prevention, 30 % to suppression and 20 % to intervention. Prevention involves disrupting the formation of gangs and curtailing gang activities. 50 % of the resources should be allocated in ensuring that gangs do not form. 30% of the resources should be...

...﻿The Government on Terrorism in Today’s World
Shannon Williams
Bryant & Stratton College
CRJU100: Introduction to CriminalJustice
Mr. Jack Collins
July 9, 2013
The Government on Terrorism in Today’s World
Terrorism is the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a Government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives. (Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc. 2013) Terrorism is like a cancer to the world today and no state is immune to it. Modern terrorism dates from the middle 1960s, when the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) formally adopted mass murder and terror as its primary policy (Netanyahu, B. 1986). After 9/11 the war on terrorism became a top priority for the government but a justifiable one as that attack affected everyone in this nation. In the case of international and national regulations regarding measures against persons or groups of persons suspected of terrorism, the international human rights standards should be fully guaranteed (Dekker, I. 2003). The purpose of this paper is to question how terrorism is being handled by our government and if changes should be made.
The government places a lot of emphasis on terrorist threats and has invested many resources on the fight against terrorism. There are three propositions to put forward when dealing with terrorism- the first on the moral level, the second on the legal...

...Maddox v. Montgomery
United States Courts of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit 718 F.2d 1033
(11th Cir. 1983)
Kenneth Davis
CJAD 405, Section A
Professor Alesio
June 08, 2011
Facts:
Jimmy Maddox was convicted of rape in a Georgia state court and sentenced to life imprisonment. Having unsuccessfully pursued his direct appeal and the state post-conviction remedy, Maddox filed a federal habeas corpus petition alleging prosecutorial suppression of exculpatory evidence in violation of the doctrine of Brady v. Maryland. There are four types of situations in which the Brady doctrine applies; the prosecutor has not disclosed information despite a specific defense request, the prosecutor has not disclosed information despite a general defense request for all exculpatory information or without any defense request at all, the prosecutor knows or should know that the conviction is based on false evidence and or the prosecutor fails to disclose purely impeaching evidence not concerning a substantive issue, in the absence of a specific defense request.
Issue:
Specifically, Maddox asserted that his right to due process was violated as outlined in violation of the doctrine of Brady v. Maryland by the state's failure to disclose a photograph taken by the police shortly after the alleged rape showing Elder's bed neatly made, the results of a police examination of the bedspread which revealed no blood, semen or other fluid, and lastly a written statement by another...