Category Archives: The Netherlands

The Dutch government says it will abandon the long-standing model of multiculturalism that has encouraged Muslim immigrants to create a parallel society within the Netherlands.

A new integration bill (covering letter and 15-page action plan), which Dutch Interior Minister Piet Hein Donner presented to parliament on June 16, reads: “The government shares the social dissatisfaction over the multicultural society model and plans to shift priority to the values of the Dutch people. In the new integration system, the values of the Dutch society play a central role. With this change, the government steps away from the model of a multicultural society.”

The letter continues: “A more obligatory integration is justified because the government also demands that from its own citizens. It is necessary because otherwise the society gradually grows apart and eventually no one feels at home anymore in the Netherlands. The integration will not be tailored to different groups.”

The new integration policy will place more demands on immigrants. For example, immigrants will be required to learn the Dutch language, and the government will take a tougher approach to immigrants to ignore Dutch values or disobey Dutch law.

The government will also stop offering special subsidies for Muslim immigrants because, according to Donner, “it is not the government’s job to integrate immigrants.” The government will introduce new legislation that outlaws forced marriages and will also impose tougher measures against Muslim immigrants who lower their chances of employment by the way they dress. More specifically, the government will impose a ban on face-covering Islamic burqas as of January 1, 2013.

the sequence of events seems to be this:
Immigrant gang of what appears to be arabs roaming the streets of Eindhoven looking for people to assault.

They come upon a Dutch man and proceed to viciously beat him. The video was leaked to the internet. There was massive backlash about this incident on social media.
Now the police have ordered the video removed from all news sites and all pictures of the faces of the perpetrators to have their faces blurred. Two of the youths have given themselves up to the police,

Share this:

THE HAGUE, 04/12/12 – Police have arrested four youths for a firework bomb attack on a police station.

On Saturday, the police station in Hilvarenbeek in Brabant was heavily damaged by fireworks. No persons were injured, but the damage was enormous. Bits of rubble from the building was scattered over the street and in gardens of houses.

The suspects are youths from Hilvarenbeek aged 17 and 18 jaar. In house raids, the police seized seven fake firearms and fireworks.

A boy who made statements about Islam on Dutch TV, will on 28 November stand in front of the Amsterdam judge.

Over two years ago, on 12 September 2010, the VPRO Holland Doc broadcasted a program about Geert Wilders about his film Fitna: Wilders, the movie. Wilders himself did not participate in the documentary. But there were other people on the floor, including Robert de Jonge, who in the program was presented as a Wilders supporter. In the documentary Robert de Jonge produced heavy critical statements about Islam. But, unlike Wilders, he said hard statements about Muslims too.

The editors of De Dagelijkse Standaard were able to inspect the minutes and from there with the following details.

On 11 September 2011 it was reported against Robert de Jong, by a Moroccan-Dutch boy because, in his own words, he felt “deeply offended”. It would constitute offenses against the now familiar Articles 137 concerning defamation and discrimination against groups, Article 262 and 266 about slander, and the ‘hate speech ban.’
Also Geert Wilders was on trial for these items. But Wilders was eventually acquitted. An important argument in his defense was that Wilders is fiercely critical in his statements about Islam, but not about Muslims.

With Robert de Jonge the latter is otherwise. The statements for which De Jonge has to stand are the following, which he did in the documentary Wilders, the movie. His judgments are in the documentary into four fragments that all will be raised.

“Yes, Islam is a danger to the world. They want to conquer the whole world by … they say themselves: the wombs of our women we will conquer Europe. So they make … yes, they’re constantly growing jihadis , so more children, more children and more children and more women from the Rif here to come for more childbearing. they just want to make sure they are in the majority, so they … so they can play the boss and that is a real danger and yes I can see that. ”

“Yes, just as a question: will anyone miss the Muslims when they were suddenly all gone, then I think all the answer will be no, because yes they add nothing to society. It’s really the Muslims who continuously whine and moan … and want special rights. … And imagine when they all would not, then there would be nothing wrong. Anyway they do it and that’s the problem. ”

“Yes, I am a member of a Forum of The Jewish Task Force. Yeah, I got in touch with those people. Yeah, they create political awareness for a real right voice … yeah … that tells not compromised the truth about Islam. ‘

“Here,” Geert Akbar”, which means “Geert is greater.” What I really means that Geert is greater than Muhammad, the childfucker. And Geert is greater than Allah, the crescent demon. … And as everyone knows Arabs are avid assfuckers. And they fuck little boys, that’s normal in their culture.”

As I said, these are statements that went beyond what was once in the trial against Geert Wilders. It therefore appears that the prosecution thinks to see here a chance for a conviction.

In the interview with the police report said Robert de Jonge about his political views that he agrees with Wilders. He also stated to have no problems with immigrants. He said that against his will statements by him appeared in the documentary, fragmented in Youtube clips, but he could do nothing. Robert de Jonge also said to be convinced that the person who filed the complaint against him was not hurt, but just wanted to silence him.

Furthermore, he said that his statements were not referring to all Muslims. That it is not a call for hate, but a starting point for Muslims to reflect on themselves.

According to Robert de Jonge in the documentary with the statement about the “assfuckers,’ part was cut by the filmmaker, where he spoke about the Kaaba. He emphasized that pedophilia is common in the Muslim culture.

Upon questioning Robert de Jonge handed photos of a mass marriage of adult men with little girls.

The pre-trial preparation of the case will take place on November 28 at Parnassusweg in Amsterdam. Same place where the trial against Geert Wilders took place.

The TV documentary in which Robert Young takes the floor, you can see in this link. It is the fragment between minute 45 and minute 49.

Woerden: The neighbours of Sharia4Holland leader ‘Abu Qasim’, suspected of death threats against Geert Wilders, called police in the night between saturday and sunday, when fifteen people wearing djellaba gathered in his Woerden house.
It is said there was a meeting between partisans of Sharia4Holland and Sharia4Belgium. TV Woerden reports that nine cars with belgian licence plates were parked in the street. Police kept an eye on it, but didn’t have to intervene.
Qasim, whose real name is Jassem Abdellaoui, was in jail last week in Amsterdam, because of death threats against Geert Wilders. The suspect actively seeks attention in the dutch and foreign media, and he puts own video clips on the internet.

This 29-year old man, grown up in Woerden, was during years a normal, non-radicalised boy who played passionately soccer with the local SC Woerden soccer club. Recently, this moslem who radicalised within a short time was portrayed by the russian station RT, in the framework of an extended tv documentary on moslem integration in Holland.

Last year, I wrote about statistics showing that Ramadan regularly unleashed a massive crime wave in Algeria. It seems this is a general phenomenon. The Dutch police are obviously now aware that is has reached Europe.

The police in Utrecht and the Hague in the Netherlands are going to reinforce their presence in the streets Ramadan. The objective is to avoid criminality progressing at the heart of the Muslim community during the Muslim fast.

Share this:

In January 2009 a Dutch court ordered Geert Wilders to be prosecuted for offending Muslims and inciting anti-Muslim hatred. The complaint was based not on slurs, as such, but on factual statements made by Wilders, in his film Fitna and in various public venues, about Islamic beliefs and about actions inspired by those beliefs. In June 2011, after a prolonged legal ordeal that cost Wilders greatly in time, money, and emotion, and that represented a disgrace to the tradition of Dutch liberty, he was finally acquitted.

In February of this year, the Islamic Students Association at the Vrije Universiteit (VU) in Amsterdam invited Haitham al-Haddad, a British sharia scholar, to participate in a symposium, but when some of al-Haddad’s sophisticated theological statements about Jews (the usual “pigs and dogs” business) and about other topics came to light, members of the Dutch Parliament spoke out against the invitation, a media storm erupted, and VU canceled its plans. Whereupon a venue in Amsterdam called De Balie, which sponsors debates, talks, plays, and sundry cultural and artistic events (and whose café is a good spot to grab a late-morning coffee), stepped in and offered al-Haddad their stage.

The public prosecution department has no plans to bring charges against a British-Palestinian expert in Sharia law for allegedly making comments which incited hatred and discrimination in Amsterdam earlier this year, news agency ANP reports.

Haitham al-Haddad made the comments during a debate which replaced a two-day symposium at Amsterdam’s VU University. The conference was cancelled following a row over al-Haddad’s views about Jews.

Anti-Islam campaigner Ehsan Jami had called for legal action against al-Haddad after he told the debate ex Muslims deserve the death penalty, as outlined in Sharia law.

However, the public prosecution department said al-Haddad had not committed any offences because he had outlined a number of conditions for applying the death penalty which made it clear this could not happen in the Netherlands.