Original image is from this page, and was released under Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0), which allows for the image to be shared and adapted as long as appropriate credit is given, and the changes made are pointed out - In this case, the edit I made to the image was the addition of the phrase 'Salutant vos omnes nos'.

I also want to acknowledge Dr Carrion and Zmax15 - we all (originally) came up with very similar ideas (due to similar/same inspiration/sources), and I hope that no ill will comes between us because of this.

Not clicking for me. The logs aren't particularly creepy, sound vaguely like every other malicious hidden anomalous group in existence, and I have no idea what I'm supposed to be getting from [DATA EXPUNGED] the Interviewer.

A lot of the writing is substantially improved since the draft I read, particularly the Containment Procedures and the opening of the Description. I'm not sure what exactly I'm meant to take from the end of the interview, but for me the Foundation is source of enough horror here to upvote.

Going to have to echo ARD and MrWrong here in that the logs were not particularly creepy for me as a reader, and that the expungements here hinder the article rather than provide a sense of mystery about what is behind the redactions and blackboxes.

On top of that, the base anomaly isn't particularly interesting for me, and as a result is not the strongest source from which to grow the horror of the rest of the article.

I liked this as a draft, but reading it then, I never felt a sense of dread or fear, and was not expecting to upvote this. However, the work you put into those logs was juuust enough to give me a very satisfying 'oh shit' moment. +1