Monday, December 24, 2012

Our First Myth

As a whole, our first myth was Santa Claus. It was relatively benign and usually fun for the whole family.

It was also a sign of things to come.

The conversation that never happened.

"Mama and daddy, why did you tell me Santa was real when he's not?"

"Well son, it was what was expected of us. Everyone does it. We would have been portrayed as very odd if we didn't, as if that really mattered, and you would have missed out on an entertaining part of your childhood."

"But wasn't it a lie and you always said you would never lie to me?"

"Yes, I guess you could say it was but it was not in mean way and now that you are older we can use the myth of Santa as a learning tool and as a warning of other myths that will try and dominate your life from now on.""I don't understand."

"You will as you get older. Myths will be used to get you you think in certain ways, to act and react in ways contrary to your best interests, to believe in things because others want you to, not because they are real but to control you. It will be much like the threat of Santa not coming with presents if you were naughty and not nice."

"I still don't understand."

"There will be the myths of religion, politics, war, history, economics and a thousand other things and they will creep into your education and life until it's hard to figure out what's reality and what's not. Maybe you will learn to ask the question "Is this another Santa myth?""

"OK daddy, will you help me?"

"Yes son, we will work through all of this together to the best of our ability. I love you."

This whole psyop has been very neatly contained within the confines of the school, with very little bleeding into other physical locations, and maybe very little bleeding from one group of responders to another. For example:

"Starting around 10:00 a.m., Danbury Hospital scrambled extra medical personnel in expectation of having to treat numerous victims. Only three wounded patients were evacuated to the hospital, where two were later declared dead."and:"The New York City medical examiner dispatched a portable morgue to assist with the aftermath."and:"The victims' bodies were removed from the school and formally identified during the night after the shooting.[85][86] A state trooper was assigned to each of the victims' families to protect their privacy and to provide information directly to them ahead of press releases by the authorities"All quotes above from wiki:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Newtown_school_shootingAll emphasis mine, and all puns intended.

Very clean operation. The real medical staff at Danbury hospital probably really did scramble, hearts aflutter, to prepare for an influx of victims. They may very well believe that a massacre took place and will explain that they never even saw a single victim because 1) There was only 3, 2)Two of them died and so didn't need treating, and 3)All the rest were taken care of by a mobile morgue.

Because there is now only ONE surviving injury victim, there is little or no need for the media to put their noses into the hospital and start asking questions of people not in the loop. They can just keep on re-using the same old stock aerial photo of the school behind their voice-overs.

With this in mind, I wonder if a similar thing is happening in the various police agencies involved.How many real local beat cops really were scrambled ,hearts aflutter, to what they had no reason to believe was nothing other than a real massacre, yet never actually got anywhere near the 'crime scene' because some higher-ups had already taken control.Of course I'm just speculating, but if this were the case, most cops would probably have no reason to doubt the reality of the situation, unless they read forums like this of course.

I don't remember where I saw it but someone claiming to be from Newtown said their local police officer friend arrived at the scene but was stopped and not allowed to enter by a SWAT team. A second hand report, who knows if it's true, but it does fit with your speculation.

The guy across the street from me committed suicide a couple years ago, and no, I never saw the body, nor was he taken to the hospital. Why would you take a corpse to a hospital? To scare the patients? Corpses are taken to morgues.

I did see a coroner's truck, firetrucks, ambulances, the crying girlfriend, cops, and talked to the father of the deceased, who told me it was the worst thing that could happen to a parent.

He wasn't crying, didn't look grief stricken, and the way he put it across, he might as well have been speaking of the weather. Guys are good at hiding their emotions. No conspiracy involved.

Suppose the reason the PTB vote-rigging went to Obama is because he promised to trash the 2nd amendment and grab the people's gun in order to new world order them better? Bwak! would have a better chance to trash the 2nd than Mitt the Twit. The foreign policy is decided by the neocons anyway so who's prez doesn't really matter.

Suppose only three people actually died at Sandy Hook including the patsy? Suppose the whole event, including the totally bogus medical examiner in a white lab coat out on the street - who probably never even finished highschool let alone specialised in forensic medicine, was a media charade to garner support to breach the 2nd amendment to bear arms absolutely?

Suppose all these theatre, mall and school shootings are government secret service ops to prepare the public for a national gun ban? Suppose we come back from the Christmas holidays to find a secret anti-gun law has been passed in the dead of night a la Federal Reserve act of 1913. Both 100% illegal but put into legislation anyway.

How Dare I - Collected Essays On The Destructive Force Of Judaism

Les Visible - The Curious Tale of Ash and The Whine: A Novel of the Unnatural and Supernatural

Follow by Email

Subscribe To

Search This Blog

Loading...

Translate

Just in case there is a misunderstanding - Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. in our efforts to identify humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.