Charlie and The Grand Bordello

by morton_h, the blogger

Disclaimer:This is not a blog about pedophile rings involving billionaires, Harward professors, catholic priests, British entertainment, British politicians or Prince Andrew. It is about a kind of prostitution, that does not necessarilly involve kinky subjects, but feeds on the same mechanisms of human abuse.Nor is it an obscene parody of 'Charlie and the Chocolate Factory', although certain chocolate barons can be smelled baking cookies backstage.

Who are the pimps and who are the prostitutes?

But it does have to do with the rule of political pimps, the Pornocracy of the World today.

Today's news:

French satirical
magazine publishes a stack of not very talented drawings in the style of the
equally primitive doodlings published in Danish newspaper, Jyllandsposten,
in 2005.

Massacre in Paris.
Three men killed twelve civilians, nine were the employees and cartoonists at
the magazine + two policemen. Some say a total of 20 dead.

The action is
professionally done by people who then are immediately connected
with a Muslim terrorist and linked with ISIS - which is likely to be
corrected to al Qaeda, as they are probably trained in Yemen -
which you can not read / hear in the media. Whether you call it
one or the other, is a matter of taste and faily irrelevant. A common term would be:
CIA-NATO-assets.

A video recording shows a policeman on the street being shot with an AK47, but a closer look shows, that the bullitt does not hit the man but the pavement, there is no blood at all, and the man moves hereafter. Questions are raised, whether the whole scenario or parts of it is staged or totally false like the Boston Bombings and the Sandy Hook school shootings, where no deads have been documented.

An ID card is 'forgotten' in the car together with molotows and jihaddist flags. Professionals do not do that. Shoutings of 'Allah hu Akbar'. Jihaddists terrorists don't do that in the middle of a terror act.

And quite
a few other anomalies. You will find lots of plausible interpretations
of all the details and circumstances on the net. Instead of going into all that, let's broaden the picture and track some patterns on the global stage.In the Western media
all deeper context is unwanted and de-facto forbidden!

[scroll ned for at læse på dansk]

We
see yet another repetition all the usual centrifugal spin in the
media, babbling politicians, journalistic halfbrains without the
ability to interpret geopolitics together with sensation events, lack of
history, detached sound bites, text-bites, info-bites from a demented
disinfo culture, childishness, surface, quarter-truths in perfect
harmony with vertical lies, propaganda, media fabrications, lack of
substance, 2D reality. Add a whole bunch of hypocrazy and fake
empathy. We can be sure of one thing: when all the media in the West
is running one particular story in one particular gear, these are
parts of a particular well organized and centrally coordinated mental
manipulation.

Your brain is
subjected to a frontal (lobe) attack, so take your helmet on!

Note
here, that the concept of intelligence
rather be pronounced shaping,
editing or
executing when
intelligence for these entities is merely a preliminary stage and a
tool for coercions, political assassinations, terrorist attacks,
coups, manipulations, mind control, financial hitman actions against
governments or people, wars, interventions. It's a hybrid of banking, mafia
and geopolitics with a bad edge.

Note also that in the same hour they start to
yell up on freedom of expression, censorship is introduced somewhere
else in the building.

Muslim
terrorism?Media shouting about Muslim
terrorism because Muslim / Arab names are being mentioned. But is this, what's
going on?

Back in the 70s we saw a series of geopolitical
terrorism. The murder of Aldo Moro, the Bologna
bombing. We know it as Operation Gladio. We also know that it was a
NATO operation and therefore also a Pentagon operation. We know also,
it later became the standard for deep-politics or militarized
geopolitics, and that today is a regular part of the program to rule
the world through terror.

The purpose of these Gladio
operations was to maintain the blocks, then West <> East, today
... West <> East - nothing new here. Together with a constant level of fear. When the Soviet machine
had done its dirty work to destroy Germany - meaning not only Nazism
but Germany as a country and as a people, Communism had to be stopped
before it flooded the rest of Europe. This was Stalins original plan
before the German launched a preventive attack on them. Therefore,
certain stay-behind
cells were formed, that were later utilized to murder people in
spectacular ways - civilians, like random passersby, women,
children, nuns and old aunts were good material, so there could be
mobilized popular reaction against the Evil Empire of the East. A
label which was not entirely wrong as we know, but populations of the West had
meanwhile forgotten how their own leaders had - excuse the lingo here
- sucked cock on Josef Stalin, because he joined the Allies in their
destruction of Germany and its people.

The site for a Gladio 1 operation

Aldo Moro was murdered
because he would bring the Communists in coalition with the Christian
Democrats. Need we say that the Pentagon and NATO also means the CIA?
What could Aldo Moro's project have meant? It could potentially have
meant a lot to the world. Some had hoped for a de-stalinisation of Communism,
but that is probably a naive thought when a sick seed as a rule can not
become a healthy tree. Communism was all wrong from the beginning, and it went exactly as conceived.

The point is, that the Italian and European Communists would have to be kept from power by demonization. The terror attacks were to be smeared onto the left wing groups. In the early '90s, the original Gladio network
was officially admitted by the corrupt, mafia ex-president Paolo
Andreotti. When you search on Gladio and Andreotti also seach for P2
Lodge, the Italian deep-state club. Gladio
was the implementing agency for the CIA-infiltrated think tank of
Italian magnates, politicians and other people interested in the
strong-arm of their country.

Geopolitical terrorism has
continued unabated since, and they did not just go for train
stations. They thought big, and they still do. A recent example is the destruction of
Libya. It was conducted by a coalition of France, USA, England +
various hang-outs including small-stupid-Denmark + a small group of
other cocksucker-states like the Netherlands and Norway - with Israel
and Saudi Arabia as backstage pimps and pushers.

This
is the big geopolitical brothel!

But what happened in
Norway? They said: Now we stop with Libya! We do not like it anymore.And what
happened then with Norway then? They got a
freaking Breivik, now that will teach the naughty children how to
behave!

Sarkozy
and the Black Adder

In France in 2012 there was a
predecessor to the recent terrorist event. Since Sarkozy re-elected,
we saw a person named Mohammed Merah attack a Jewish school and get a
lot of attention to it. He drove around on a scooter and shot away at
people. He managed to do three attacks. The material about him was
suppressed by the police - which Sarkozy government controlled at
that time (or the other way around or somone controlled both, which ever way you like it). But according to 'the manual' he was shot before
he could reveal anything about his principals.

The philosophical Black Adder
You may find the French adder in the picture-collage above?

Sarkozy
'philosophical' adviser is called - and is still is to today as
Sarkozy goes for a comeback: Bernard Henri-Levy, his Black
Adder, his Grima Wormtongue, the Zionist spin doctor, hi-society
playboy and so-called philosopher who whispered in the ears with
his ophioglossum that France should take the lead in destroying
Libya. And so they did. The suggestion had arrived from the Israeli
pimp-and-pusher backstage area, because Gaddafi was a major thorn in
the eye for Middle East dictatorships as well as for Western
oligarcy. Saudi Arabia ordered the dirty action and paid for it with
their oil-trillions - and Libya's gold reserves to take for free afterwards. They payed themselves with the West being silent about Saudi slaughtering of oppositions in the Gulf states, Bahrain for example. We must also
remember to call the former president by his full name: Nicolas
Sarkozy Wisner. His stepfather with the same surname was a CIA
agent. And who could benefit from the recent terrorist act? Indeed Sarkozy, who lines up on the side to come back as
president.

Mohammed Merah was shot before he could talk. May
we guess that the same will happen with the fugitives Kouachi
Brothers, that have been linked to the recent terrorist attacks. Some claim, that it already happened, but such claim are always covered with mist and can not be verified. Also
remember that Gaddafi was murdered before he could speak. And be assured, that this guy would know and speak all sorts of compromizing stuff about his enimies. The same
with Saddam Hussein. The same with bin Laden (all of them). Whether it is hi-level
patsies or low-level patsies or whether, as with Gaddafi, they refuse
to be a patsy (a pet boy - as former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen, say-no-more),
they were murdered. Mahatma Gandhi was assassinated. Martin Luther
King was assassinated. JFK was assassinated. Bob Marley, John Lennon,
Benazir Bhutto ... and especially, quite particular: the patsies who
murdered them, so they could not tell who ordered the assassinations.
We see loads of murders / fake suicides and 'disappearances' after the Olof Palme
murder, after the Estonia sinking, after 9/11, after the Oklahoma
bombing, after the 7/7 bombings* in London. We have also seen shredding of material of evidence like with the Bengazi-event, where Hillary Clinton was rather, shall we say, instrumental i the killing of an ambassador (who was not really an ambassador) in and embassy (that was a CIA facility).

There is a long, proud tradition for political assassination. Twenty important state leaders were assassinated as a
prelude to the first World War to ensure that the war was possible. All were they either potential opponents of the war or opponents
of the British Empire. Breivik they didn't have to assassinate,
because he is in lifelong custody and will never speak to
anyone, and because he was more the Manchurian Candidate MK-Ultra type, that was totally mindcontrolled. Convenient insanity based on trauma. When you learn about his mother, you know that this guy was really fucked.

Convicted as deserved.But who were never convicted?

Merah was an agent of the French
intelligence service / coercion service / exectution service, and the
whole affair smells of patsy-dirty-work. He was hired by Interior
Minister Claude Guéant and Bernard Squarciny, head of DFT, later
DCRI, the French equivalents to the FBI and CIA. They were his
handlers, a patsy always has handlers. He was a French
counterpart to Lee Harvey Oswald. He had nothing to do with the
planning of the murders, and he was killed before he could tell about
who had given the orders for him to follow. This is a classic script
for an intelligence operation and subsequent cover-up. One can really
wonder that these patsies never read books. They could easily read
about what's going to happen to them shortly after they have carried
out their killings. They can not be the brightest intellects. Which means that they have been selected because they never read books
but simply do what is being told. We are talking about people who's
motives are stronger than their doubts: the smell of money or the
sense of I'm a bad motherfucker agent playing with the real
important bad boys! They are broken people, who's self esteem depends on this feeling of importance. Probably adrenalin junkies. Fanatics are most wellcome also. Before WW1 the
Empire hired Anarchist fanatics. After WW2 they hired fascist fanatics. Now they hire Muslim fanatics. Moreover a bunch of actors, that never would get a role in a proper feature film.

The
hollow speechAn outcry is now raised about freedom of
expression. Can it be more political correct? For example, Sony Pictures now claims to speak freely
about a murder on the North Korean president with a thinly veiled
call for someone to actually do it. Why Sony? Because the company is
close pasted up by the American paramilitary organization or
think-spin-tank, the Rand Corporation. They are both seated in Santa Monica,
California, and Amy Pascal has been on the board of Rand, now she is
director of Sony Pictures. Her father worked in Rand's finance
department throughout his life. When they did this inflamed movie,
The Interview (a lousy movie, some say), they contacted af guy called Bruce Bennett from Rand
Corp, whose specialty happened to be the overthrow of the
North Korean regime. And his scenario it can only be done by 'removing'
their supreme leader.

With such an organization
poluting the minds of movie audiences, and with the mega-hype that
has been around the movie, it's a serious matter. You cheer and yell
that now have the truth prevailed and freedom of expression as
well, while in reality being sold a secret intelligence operation.
Especially liberals with brain full of potato mash can not get enough
of all the kind, as long as it appears to be politically
correct.

The 'progressive' magazine Charlie Hebdo, the French
magazine, a tradition dating back to Voltaire, and which sets itself
up as freedom, truth and free, critical speach. The magazine has its
roots in the 60s and was part of an anti-de Gaulle setup. This
legendary president was a particular headache for the British and the
Americans, because he refused as a nationalist to obey them, as they
expected. Whether they had fingers with the creation of the magazine
at that time is unknown but very conceivable and a standard way to do
it.

The phenomenon of the Muhammed Cartoons was no
coincidence. This thought was conceived and introduced at the
Bilderberg Group meeting in Rotach at Munich in the summer of 2005.
Present were a Danish newspaper editor and a prime minister of
Denmark. Anders Fogh Rasmussen, that had lied to the Danish population
together with Bush and Blair about WMD in Iraq, and for that and other
'services' to the global Establishment was rewarded with the post as general secretary of NATO. Shortly after we see the provocation
being put in the water with loud singing of the anthem 'O, Holy
freedom of expression'. The purpose of the provocation was to
recruit Europe in the war, that Dick Cheney and the neo-con gang had
planned against Iran. Now you can see how hostile Muslims go
against the West, so now we are at war again! Anything new this time?

Political
satire can be fun. Voltaire could also be quite entertaining. Even satire including Muslims should be possible. And Jews - but try to do that in France, and you will see pathetic outcries and zionist terrorism immediately. The same in other countries to some extend. First of all you will see the standard offer role put forward. You will see whining, whimping, weaseling and warnings. Warnings with embedded threats. You will constantly hear the word anti-semite. The latter, of course, will have to be translated to anti-zionist, since it is the zionists who are the real anti-semites, since they hate all semitic speaking people exept themselves (301.000.000 Arabic speaking people). Add to this all the non-Arabic speaking muslims. Add to that all black jews expelled from Israel and people with black skin generally. Add to that the rest of the non-jewish population of the world called goyim. You end up with the undisputedly most racist people on Planet Earth calling other people racists!

The zionist lobby has been influential in France. This
Charlie-thing is something else than what we see on the surface. Mentioning Voltaire, there do exist a group called Voltaire Network led by Thierry
Maison. He knows France very well and says, that doing a stunt
like this in a country with a large Muslim minority can only be done for creating serious trouble. There are lots of immigrants from Morocco,
Tunisia and Algeria, and especially the Algerians or their
families have experienced very unpleasant things under French
colonial rule. It can be seen only, says Maison, as an attempt to
start a civil war in France. And as you may be aware of, civil wars
are never initiated by civilians nor do they benefit civilians.
Someone has pissed in the anthill.

NATO discipliningThis
is where the geopolitical implications enter the area. There is an ongoing disciplining of the NATO alliance. We saw it when Norway announced, that
they would not bomb Libya any longer, and moreover mentioned that they
would recognize a Palestinian state - then they got Breivik, who
along with a bewitnessed but never identified and centainly never
arrested other man (his handler?) shot away at social
democrat's / government leader's children at their political holiday
camp. The message is dramatically obvious you would think. The media carefully avoided to do any obvious connections.

But what has France done
wrong in relation to NATO? It really should not be difficult for a
gifted journalistic commentator to come up with. But either it is
a dry season for such 'gifts' in the West, or journalists are shit scared of losing
their jobs or their heads - figuratively or literally. The murder of Michael
Hastings has shown that certain powers do not go out of the way of
executing journalists, just as they currently are busy murdering
bankers, who have come close to some of the 'black' bank transactions
link closely with the CIA and their post-WW2 shadow banking system.
You know the huge black hole in the World Economy that money seem to
be sucked into in order for every country in the World to be i
debt.

President Hollande, who is normally a puppet of US
domination policy and gladly puts French soldiers eg the US Africom
Operation, said recently in an interview that it was time to stop
these excruciating sanctions against Russia. Lately, he has been
unpopular in France by not carrying out socialist policies, so he
might have decided to try something like that. Or has he just been
reminded by people in his administrative apparatus that France actually has a
tradition of being independent, and that they can say NO and have
done so with authoritative punch down through history. Recently he
had a meeting with Vladimir Putin at Charles de Gaulle Airport, a
kind of fly-by-meeting, where we of course do not know what they were
talking about. But a week later he comes out speaking his opinion.
And what does he get in return? He gets a Charlie freaking Hebdo!
Meaning: This is what we release on your country if you fail to abide
by the NATO-discipline! Another parallel to the
Norway-Stoltenberg-Breivik complex is that Hollande recently happened
to mention recognition of a Palestinian state. Ring a
bell? Terrorism is a useful instrument in turning mass opinion in a short time.

Now would a civilized state like Israel perform terrorism? How can anyone but the brainwashed dinosaur media and their most braindead readers doubt that? You need not study the forming of the State of Israel, the Zionist settlers, the behaviour towards their neighbours, their view on other people on the planet and their Holocaust in Gaza right now to see, that terror was in the very core of Israelian policy from the beginning til now.

A whole series of terrorism events bear heavy fingerprints of Israeli Mossad. Israel's terrorbombing and false flag on USS Liberty during the 6-days War. Japan starting to critizise Israel and then: Fukushima! Israeli security company responsible for the Fukushima plant - as also the London Subways, as WTC. Israeli terror attack on Iranian nuclear facility with Stuxnet virus. Israeli terror attacks in Egypt (the Lavon affair), where the Israeli agents even were caught with bomb, that didn't blow off. Israeli terror in Argentina when Kristina Fernandes oppose Zionist bankers from Wall Street. Israeli terror against Syria - they let a dirty bomb go off outside Damascus! And Malaysia deeply insulted Israel by holding an independant tribunal i Kuala Lumpur convicting among others Israeli presidents as war criminals committing crimes against humanity! And what happened? Three airplanes from Air Malaysia fell out of the sky!

But Russia! Here one might claim, that EU and NATO is not the
same, and that it was the EU which imposed trade sanctions against Russia,
not NATO. But it will be just as mistaken as to claim that the
Pentagon and the US government and thus American foreign policy are
different sizes. Trade war and hot war are always a direct
extension of each other. They ARE the same, though the ammunition is
different. You can also turn it around and say that the EU has become
a belligerent power, and that NATO leads foreign policy, whatever way you want. In a World where Everything is Upside Down, it makes it's own perverted kind of sense.

Those who have committed these actions, these terrorists, these illuminati, have nothing to do with Islam. (‘Ceuc qui ont commis ces actes, ces terroristes, ces illumines, ces fanatiques, n’ont rien a voir avec la religion Muslim’)

'Illumines' is the French word for the Italian word 'Illuminati'. This is hardly a coincidence, and probably the first time in a very long time, that a leader of a state uses that word. I believe, that the Founding Fathers of America knew it also. It is referring directly to the Jacobite subversive fanatics that were behind the French revolution. From Bavaria and England they had deep ties to the equally subversive Jesuits with their goal as the corruption and destruction of all nations and all governments. And how do they tie into later Zionism? Every Jesuit general of this militant cult, that's what it is, have been a socalled Crypto-Jew, descendants of Jews that were converted to Christianity in Spain at the time of the Jew and wannabe Knights Templar, Loyola. You will be very surprised to learn, how many of the (worst!) men and women in power have been raised by Jesuits. As the Jesuit, Cardinal Richelieu said: 'Give me the child at seven, and he is mine the rest of his life'.

The Jesuit cult is a Death Cult with its roots all the way back to Babylonian demonism, what we would call satanism today. And now we have a Jesuit pope with a dirty record from the Dirty War in Argentina. What dirty contributions does he have for the World yet? Note also, that one of the only countries, from where the Jesuits have been expelled is: Russia. Due to the Orthodox Church that knew, what these sleek servants - or rather infiltrators of the Vatican stood for.

The term Illuminati, that has become sort of a hollow clichée and much abused among concpiracy freaks, then does apply to these groups, that also count the Freemason groups from the Grand Orleans lodge, that was part of Britisk King Edward VII's network organized the arise of the First World War.For in-depth see: Webster Griffin Tarpley

Aliya So we are never far from a Jewish fingerprint in any case. Remember, that a Jewish market was attacked in Paris. In Belgium a Jewish museum was attacked some years ago just before an election - strange how these event coincide with political events, where voters and opinions can be moved. Like the Merah incident. And what happened right after Paris? The psychopath, Netanyahu, showed up uninvited and forced his way to the front row among hypocratic European politicians posing in front of the cameras. His rhetorical claim is now, that France is an insecure place for Jews and that they should all migrate to Israel, making Aliya in Hebrew term. And how hypocritical isn't that, knowing how Israeli Jews, mostly Azkenazi Jews from Eastern Europe, have treated the Sephardic Jews? Most french Jews have a background from Northern Africa.So why would Israel campaign to push mass emigration to Israel? Because they have a population problem. Israelis don't make enough children. Therefore there will not be enough young men and women to serve for the huge army, the country needs to bully their neighbours and to maintain the zionist-appartheit military state. And they don't have enough skilled craftsmen to fix their electricity and plumbings, aso. The new Sephardic emigrants may soon find out, that it is easier to start a pizza-shop than to make a career in elite-jobs in Israel. Apartheit is also internal among Jews, and they have always been second hand citizens. Years ago we saw a huge mass emigration of Jews from Russia and the Baltic, about 1 million. They were used to push the borders of Israel even further. And 'used' is the right word, because mr. Netanyahu don't give a shit about these people except for their usability to zionist policy. This Azkhanazi guy truly hates the Separdic Jews. Decades ago experiments were made with 100.000 Sephardic children in Israel to test their reactions to high doses of radiation! They were called the Ringworm Children, and they later, no surprise, developed cancer. Looking back in history, Jews have been mistreated the most by other Jews (the Big Jews versus the Small Jews). Eugenics has never been foreign to Jews, but as many other features with these people it was smeared onto the Nazis. We know for sure, that the Azkhenazi-Jewish Rockefeller-foundation financed eugenic experiments and policies from the early 20th century and on.Some years ago there used to be about 500.000 Jews in France. Since then 100.000 have chosen to move either to USA or Israel. So how convenient is not a series of terror attacks on Jews (performed by people hired by Jews?). How convenient is not mass emigration from The Middle East and North Africa to France - an the whole of Europe - to create tensions and conflicts? Howe convenient is not th double purpose of Aliya-busting and destruction of European culture at the same time. We cannot underestimate the deep hatred Azkhenazi-Jews have for the countries that caused them so much trouble. Or the countries they caused so much trouble, depending on how you look at it (eg. the era of Jewish Bolsjevism).Greece
moves onSeveral agendas seem to cross-over - back to the NATO-track. If Norway faltered in the nefarious alliance against
Libya, followed the Netherlands, Denmark and all the others? Cannot have that. If France falters in the equally
nefarious alliance against Russia, follow who? Cannot
have that. Germany is in deep doubt with extensive trade relations with
Russia. Several Eastern European countries are uncomfortable with it,
but they just came into the EU and still have the advantage of it - as
long as it lasts. Southern European countries have less and less
reason to be loyal to the Union, for they have been robbed by the
European Central Bank and the IMF.

Greece, for example, is on
the way to an election in which they are almost on their way out.
Almost, since this is just a newspaper-headline-misunderstanding. The
Syriza party and Alexis Tsipras have actually not said that they will opt out
of the EU, but give the EU severe resistance from the inside. The
main application of the party is anti-austerity - austerity understood
as masochistic self-chosen poverty because of indebtedness - an
indebtedness, which is mostly criminal. The Greeks have messed up in
the previous decade, but the real crime is not their messing up, but
the IMF, the ECB and Goldman Sachs severely exploiting the situation.
They were meant to and seduced to mess up. The withdrawal from the EU
or the Euro-zone was a demagogic opinion of Angela Merkel, who
twisted the message in that direction. It was more like a hidden
threat that Greece be announced, if they decided to vote for the
'wrong' party. Germany and Deutsche Bank earn a lot of euro on the
Greek indebtment.

Just to clarify: the Greeks screwed up. They
let themselves be enchanted by the Greek oligarchs, the approximately
10 families that control Greece. It was the same families who
inserted the fascist junta in the 60s-70s, who decades later let
Goldman Sachs in to destroy the country's economy. Tsipras has
promised - just as Putin did to the Russian oligarchs - to be tough
in the clinch. No more free lunch, no more free broadcast licenses to
the rich, anti-tax policy, no more gift rain to banks, a fight in the
EU in the form of confrontation with austerity ghouls, Cameron and
Merkel and demands for - at least - half of the grotesque usury
debt, that was forced upon them.

When I paid the bill at a
Greek restaurant recently, I casually asked the waiter about what
happened with Greece after the upcoming election? First of all he was
surprised that someone bothered to take an interest in his native
country's and people's fate. He said he sincerely hoped that the
election went to Syriza that there were 10 families who ruled the
country, the EU could go to hell, and - with a twinkle in his eye -
that people over 40 years should be denied the right to vote, and
that there were some politicians and journalists who should be dumped
in the harbor, although it probably would be counted for as pollution
of the Mediterranean.

I commented - also with a twinkle in his
eye - that he was a hard-hard man. I didn't disaggre, I only would modify
the means a bit. He asked why there were no more people who thought
like me? I knew exactly why he said that. He simply had met the pampered,
uninformed Danes uttering: 'It is the lazy, corrupt Greek's
own sake, and now they are into deserved trouble'. Charming. This is the
Dane, who has seen so much television that his brain has become a
1920 x 1080 pixel full HD flat screen with remote
control.

Danish TV brain

The French-Russian
ConnectionFrance recently sold two large Mistral warships to
Russia, a kind of modern plane carrier warships, super-hi-tech of
course. But the embargo against Russia has put the deal to a halt and the ships
never came out of the yard. Not good for the French national budget,
which is already not feeling well. Actually disastrous for the entire
French shipbuilding industry. But in his interview Hollande says that
Putin has assured him that he did not want to annex Ukraine and added, that
sanctions should be lifted, if progress was made, that is.
Unfortunately, we know that the Americans will do everything to
prevent progress and escalate the conflict. Furthermore he quoted
Putin for saying that Russia wants to have influence, so that Ukraine
does not fall into the hands of NATO.

Those who have a
historical memory in addition to a few years will know, how NATO has
consistently broken all the promises that were given by the lifting
of the Iron Curtain and has expanded its war territory with one, the
second and the third country ever since. This while the Warshaw Pact
has long since been abandoned. Why is the purpose of NATO then? Does
anyone believe, that NATO is any longer what it calls itself: a defense
alliance? Do we need to say that the fall of the Iron Curtain and formal
termination the Cold War only meant further boost to America's
megalomania, since they could now thought itself to be a uni-lateral
power in a mono-polar power world.

So the US has now turned
terrorist weapon against France - is the claim substantiated in the
above. The media fail miserably - need we say of course? - to
see the connections. In this as in all other cases of terrorism and
political assassination we are served the story of the lonely
madman who on his own bleeding hand and out of the thin blue one
day happens to go crazy because he had a bad childhood, had been
seduced by some evil mullahs, or due to an upset stomach. Or it is
rotated so now we surely hate all Muslims and people with brown skin, who in turn surely must hate all people with white skin. After
which we the next moment surely must love all Muslims and people with
brown skin, not being touted as racists. After which ... Confused?
You also will be in the next episode of S.O.A.P.

Americans
know that they can anytime have a peaceful deal with the Russians.
They just need to recognize that - and we can without blinking add,
of course - there is a legitimate Russian sphere of influence
in neighboring countries that are so close to Moscow / Kremlin, and
that Russia is within its rights to protect itself, because Russia
of course, can not live with actively hostile neighbors in the
clutches of Aggression Pact, NATO. Even the old war mongerer, Henry Kissinger, tried to tell that to his country's administration.

An interesting twist in the
tail is that the new NATO General Secretary is the same Stoltenberg,
who hesitated in Libya War and who's country, Norway, got a Breivik. We may
even speculate to what extent he was aware of or even accomplices in
Breivik affair. Or just ignorant on a higher level? An affair, which also landed in the media with the
stereotype of the lonely madman with no connection to anything or
anyone. As Ole Dammegaard, Danish-Swedish journalist (the man who
solved the Olof Palme murder in 900 pages: Coup d'Etat In Slowmotion), author and tireless researcher describes in his comparative
analysis of political assassinations and acts of terrorism: this is
simply the template for these events. It's the same pattern,
the same backstage actor, the same media spin, the same yield for
same people, always-always. Never change a tactics when it
works.

The Paris Attacks do fall in line with the main trend of politically motivated assassinations and terror events going back decades and centuries. You may want to check out this article by Ole Dammegaard on Veterans TodaycalledUnexpected links in the murders of JFK, John Lennon and Olof Palme. It is by the way very interesting, that especially among US war veterans you will find a growing awareness of the huge deception and abuse, that they themselves have been victims of.

Jan. 15th - five days in writing - there will be talks
in Kazakhstan, where Putin will meet with NATO-IMF puppett
Poroshenko, neo-fascist from the coup in Ukraine, where also Angela
Merkel and Francois Hollande have announced their arrival. Hollande
says, as mentioned, that the condition for his participation is the opportunity to
make progress. Hollande has therefore on the one hand been told by
Putin that it is actually possible to progress. While at the same
time he got a Charlie, that tells him, that this kind of progress he
may well forget about in a hurry.

Is that smoke coming out of
your brain, Mr. Pornoshenko?

In Hollande hinterland, worm
tongue Bernard Henri-Levy - say the name Levy and you may know both the personality
and the Agenda - now demands that France again and on its own
intervene in Libya. Now again! But Hollande would not do this as
would the Sarkozy government. This must be properly understood. If
Hollande wanted it, he would certainly not hesitate to do it. In his
reign, France has intervened in Ivory Coast, Mali and in a number of
the countries that form the Sahel / Sahara / Maghreb belt in North
and West Africa. It is the old French colonial sphere and has now
become French neo-colonial sphere. Libya under the Gaddafi guaranteed
a great stability in the region, and therefore Gaddafi was removed
with France as a major player, whereby the stability was destroyed.
Imperialism can only thrive in a acidophilous of instability and
chaos, and this indeed has arrived in Libya! It was
almost convenient for Hollande that his political opponent did that
piece of dirty work before him. This is how
block-policy-post-democracy works. The other block is supposed
to do the dirty work, that your block cannot have on its hands, but could not be without.

It
is generally an idea among observers that the French have certain
resources in the telescope in West Africa. Uranium, for example.
Again comes to Africa to experience a wave of colonial raids, which
they get nothing out of - except poverty, disease, neo-tribal wars.
We know it, it has been going on for 150 years.

Prison
educationThe terror act in Paris has some similarities with
the equally strange act that took place in Australia at the end of
December 2014. One of Kouachi brothers in France was a member of 'La
Filière Iraqienne', the Iraqi network. In 2003-05 he was one of
those who had wanted to go to Damascus to fight the Americans. Later
he went to prison. In Sydney, there was a jailed person who was
out on leave during which he begins to shoot on people. Then arrives fluffy
opinions from Australian politicians that 'Now we must look to
find out why this wife killer was out on leave'.
Which they of course never will by asking the police, that would have known all about, what this dangerous person was capable of.

There
are certain patterns that recur. People who have been in prison, have
always received some form of 'education'. It can be informal, so just
to be trained as a criminal by other more hardened criminals. But it can also be highly
organized. Guantanamo prisoners is an example. Several of these have
apparently received instructions and have been recruited by their
tormentors. When they are released, they will be lethal killing machines
or terrorist leaders. And more important: they are terror-zombies
fully controlled by their educators / principals. The alleged leader
of ISIS, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, is one such. This practice is apparently not foreigh to the
French. Merah as an example, and what about the Kouashi brothers?

If
they are, what commentators expect, they are Westerners - here native
Frenchmen who witnesses heard speaking perfect French - they were
socalled radicalized, they have spent time in NATO's training camps
in the Middle East, supposedly Yemen, they have done service in Iraq / Libya / Syria -
or where there was need for them and money in the pocket - finally to
be returned to their own country to practice domestic terror. And if
they have been fighting in Syria, they may have used weapons that
France has provided, which only makes it more grotesque! These
radicalized types are really our day's mercenaries performing
the dirty work that governments do not want to be held accountable
for. In other words: from the beginning they were created for a dual
purpose: to fight against the Empire's enemies abroad and intimidate
the Empire's own people domestically.

By now, more than 600 terrorists have returned from their 'educational training' in Iraq an Syria to their European countries. How many of these will be ready to perform like in Paris? We also know, that more than 100 did not return lately, because they were executed by ISIL. Were they found to be improper for future services, or did they find out, for what cause and for whom they actually had served? We want sociopathic killers, not romantics.

If you are confused,
it's probably not much consolation that you are not alone. But that's
how it is, when you are not satisfied with 2D-reality on flat
screens.But right now: Do not
confuse intelligence operations with freedom of expression!Like the
types in the picture here, posing for CNN in Marseille:

Je-suis?
Has this something to do with Jesus? I certainly looks like religion
to me.

Je Suis LangleyNo Anglo-American war of conquest, no Charlie Hebdo massacre.No CIA, no Militant Islam, no Al-Qaeda, no ISIS, no Charlie Hebdo massacre.No 9/11, no “war on terrorism”, no ISIS deception, no Charlie Hebdo massacre.No war against Russia, no Charlie Hebdo massacre.Je Suis Charlie? No!To the naïve ones who believe the lies and march on the streets
carrying the signs, you are the victims, the gullible, the dupes, the
pawns.Tu es CIA.Tu es NATO.fra 'Je suis CIA' fra globalresearch.ca

Strange the way - by the way - that all these banners and signs were ready and mass produced and spread faster than almost possible. Strange the way, that the magazine had raised its printed output to a quite unusual million copies. Someone knew something.

The cover- and clean-upAnd as expected, a case like this rolls on. After a crime comes the cover-up. Certain people will have to be removed from the scene, if they make any wrong moves. Now a police chief in Limoges investigating the case has 'committed suicide'.It's like there is a manual for writing pulp clichee criminal novels that prescribes certain ingrediences. 'Being suicided' is certainly one of them, and we would have been disappointed if it was missing. A parallel example: The deaths of police officers, one of them being the chief officer, Hemant Karkare, during and right after the Mumbai terror attacks in november 2008. The massacre included 150 people, 20 foreigners, 14 police officers on 7 locations in Mumbai. The timing of the event was in a period of anti-American sentiments in both India and Pakistan, and the group that performed the attacks were closely linked to the US-sponsored and -trained al Qaeda network. Their methods had close resemblance with those of the NATO-affiliated Chechen terror groups, a part of NATO Operation Gladio 2.The purpose of the the attack was the usual British devide-and-conquer going back to the days, where Britain lost its 'Crown Juvel', India as prime colony and in a, one might say, childish-destructive response orchestrated the division into India and Pakistan, where Muslims were being used as instruments for the creation of regional conflict. As they are today. The police chief officer in Mumbai had to die in order to cover-up the informations he had. We may expect, that the police chief officer in Limoges was dealt with in the same manner.

A good portion of the above information will be found here:Webster Griffin Tarpley: Behind the Charlie Hebdo Massacre

* 'Sevens' story, linket up with the 7/7-bombningerne, Tony Blair's 9/11, is a remarkable in-depth story about the attrocities, that now are common in British society and its peculiar kind of corrupt lawlesness. Her story contains so many angles and perspectives apart from the 7/7-association, that it is impossible to fathom in a short version.I urge you to go and check out, what this woman has to say. Appart from being one of the most couragious individuals, she has penetrated deep into the scumbaggery of British establishment and thus has become extremely dangerous to the scumbags.

__________

Finally instead of linking up to a dirty video with dirty men doing dirty work for dirty powers, yet again confirming that both Western and Muslim culture are severely under attack by perverting forces, I would rather remind us about the profound beauty of these cultures being destroyed. Go and clear you mind and listen to the ensemble 'Faran':