Do you work for the Republican Party? Everytime I read one of your posts or negative comments I become more and more conservative.

No. I just can't keep myself from pointing out how stunningly idiotic your posts are. I might ask the same question of you since your incoherent ramblings is probably turning off my posters to "conservatism" than you realize.

Do you work for the Republican Party? Everytime I read one of your posts or negative comments I become more and more conservative.

No. I just can't keep myself from pointing out how stunningly idiotic your posts are. I might ask the same question of you since your incoherent ramblings is probably turning off my posters to "conservatism" than you realize.

You don't like his blunt style, but the fact is what he says resonates with many and you can look at polls.

I don't get why what Christopher says he wants makes him an "idiot". Granted, it may not exactly be realistic, but a guy can dream. I'm sure many Americans would like the same thing --- doesn't make them all a bunch of idiots.

Do you work for the Republican Party? Everytime I read one of your posts or negative comments I become more and more conservative.

No. I just can't keep myself from pointing out how stunningly idiotic your posts are. I might ask the same question of you since your incoherent ramblings is probably turning off my posters to "conservatism" than you realize.

You don't like his blunt style, but the fact is what he says resonates with many and you can look at polls.

Nope. His style isn't blunt, it's childish. I can't even figure out what "CULTURE: Constitution and the Bill of Rights" means.

Two liberals have responded to my post and both have spouted off negative energy.

Christopher - we all generally ignore rnch. Even the liberals don't pay attention to him. He has never made a substantive point and what he posted is very typical. He is an embarrassment to the liberals, and just takes up space, nothing more.

Two liberals have responded to my post and both have spouted off negative energy.

Christopher - we all generally ignore rnch. Even the liberals don't pay attention to him. He has never made a substantive point and what he posted is very typical. He is an embarrassment to the liberals, and just takes up space, nothing more.

On the plus-side, rnch is an actual person, as opposed to CHRISTOPHER34 who is a sock account for someone else. And not a very convincing one.

And save the "why haven't you reported me to administration" nonsense because no one gives enough of a shit about it to both Chris with it. We'd much rather mock you and watch you continue to waste your time managing two personalities.

Christian73 saidOn the plus-side, rnch is an actual person, as opposed to CHRISTOPHER34 who is a sock account for someone else. And not a very convincing one.

And save the "why haven't you reported me to administration" nonsense because no one gives enough of a shit about it to both Chris with it. We'd much rather mock you and watch you continue to waste your time managing two personalities.

Thought we had graduated from that. There was never any evidence to support that assertion. On the other hand, Christopher stated he will cam and has numerous buddies, so that tends to discount what you say. I think your stating that results from your frustration with the issues that Christopher raises. So why not either provide all your proof that it is a sock account, or stifle it for good.

Christian73 saidOn the plus-side, rnch is an actual person, as opposed to CHRISTOPHER34 who is a sock account for someone else. And not a very convincing one.

And save the "why haven't you reported me to administration" nonsense because no one gives enough of a shit about it to both Chris with it. We'd much rather mock you and watch you continue to waste your time managing two personalities.

Thought we had graduated from that. There was never any evidence to support that assertion. On the other hand, Christopher stated he will cam and has numerous buddies, so that tends to discount what you say. I think your stating that results from your frustration with the issues that Christopher raises. So why not either provide all your proof that it is a sock account, or stifle it for good.

I'm using the "Obama isn't a citizen" standard whereby "Christopher34" has to submit his long-form birth certificate for our review. I'm sure all the conservative guys on here will support this standard.

The evidence to the contrary is obvious to anyone who has been on this forum for any length of time.

Christian73 saidOn the plus-side, rnch is an actual person, as opposed to CHRISTOPHER34 who is a sock account for someone else. And not a very convincing one.

And save the "why haven't you reported me to administration" nonsense because no one gives enough of a shit about it to both Chris with it. We'd much rather mock you and watch you continue to waste your time managing two personalities.

Thought we had graduated from that. There was never any evidence to support that assertion. On the other hand, Christopher stated he will cam and has numerous buddies, so that tends to discount what you say. I think your stating that results from your frustration with the issues that Christopher raises. So why not either provide all your proof that it is a sock account, or stifle it for good.

I'm using the "Obama isn't a citizen" standard whereby "Christopher34" has to submit his long-form birth certificate for our review. I'm sure all the conservative guys on here will support this standard.

The evidence to the contrary is obvious to anyone who has been on this forum for any length of time.

Christian73 saidOn the plus-side, rnch is an actual person, as opposed to CHRISTOPHER34 who is a sock account for someone else. And not a very convincing one.

And save the "why haven't you reported me to administration" nonsense because no one gives enough of a shit about it to both Chris with it. We'd much rather mock you and watch you continue to waste your time managing two personalities.

Thought we had graduated from that. There was never any evidence to support that assertion. On the other hand, Christopher stated he will cam and has numerous buddies, so that tends to discount what you say. I think your stating that results from your frustration with the issues that Christopher raises. So why not either provide all your proof that it is a sock account, or stifle it for good.

I'm using the "Obama isn't a citizen" standard whereby "Christopher34" has to submit his long-form birth certificate for our review. I'm sure all the conservative guys on here will support this standard.

The evidence to the contrary is obvious to anyone who has been on this forum for any length of time.

Pathetic and humorous at the same time.

Actually, pathetic is creating multiple fake accounts in order to suggest that more people share your ideology than actually do. It's the same as the Tea Baggers busing in the people for their rallies.

Christian73 saidOn the plus-side, rnch is an actual person, as opposed to CHRISTOPHER34 who is a sock account for someone else. And not a very convincing one.

And save the "why haven't you reported me to administration" nonsense because no one gives enough of a shit about it to both Chris with it. We'd much rather mock you and watch you continue to waste your time managing two personalities.

Thought we had graduated from that. There was never any evidence to support that assertion. On the other hand, Christopher stated he will cam and has numerous buddies, so that tends to discount what you say. I think your stating that results from your frustration with the issues that Christopher raises. So why not either provide all your proof that it is a sock account, or stifle it for good.

I'm using the "Obama isn't a citizen" standard whereby "Christopher34" has to submit his long-form birth certificate for our review. I'm sure all the conservative guys on here will support this standard.

The evidence to the contrary is obvious to anyone who has been on this forum for any length of time.

Pathetic and humorous at the same time.

Actually, pathetic is creating multiple fake accounts in order to suggest that more people share your ideology than actually do. It's the same as the Tea Baggers busing in the people for their rallies.

Christian73 saidOn the plus-side, rnch is an actual person, as opposed to CHRISTOPHER34 who is a sock account for someone else. And not a very convincing one.

And save the "why haven't you reported me to administration" nonsense because no one gives enough of a shit about it to both Chris with it. We'd much rather mock you and watch you continue to waste your time managing two personalities.

Thought we had graduated from that. There was never any evidence to support that assertion. On the other hand, Christopher stated he will cam and has numerous buddies, so that tends to discount what you say. I think your stating that results from your frustration with the issues that Christopher raises. So why not either provide all your proof that it is a sock account, or stifle it for good.

I'm using the "Obama isn't a citizen" standard whereby "Christopher34" has to submit his long-form birth certificate for our review. I'm sure all the conservative guys on here will support this standard.

The evidence to the contrary is obvious to anyone who has been on this forum for any length of time.

Pathetic and humorous at the same time.

Actually, pathetic is creating multiple fake accounts in order to suggest that more people share your ideology than actually do. It's the same as the Tea Baggers busing in the people for their rallies.

Yes, of course. There is a quota limit of 5, which happens to be the number of real gays who believe in fiscal policies at odds with the progressive wing of the Democrats. Any number in excess of 5 must be sock accounts.

Yes. I agree with a balanced budget, tax reform, and term limits. The rest are just personal desires you wish to push onto everyone else, which is not how government is s'posed to work. However, seeing as how our government works against us rather than with us...I can see how you could get sucked into the foolish thinking that your personal desires are worthy to be laws/policies forced onto everyone.

Btw, the one dude was right about one thing...you're obviously confused about what culture is and means.

CHRISTOPHER34 said

HndsmKansan said

CHRISTOPHER34 saidHere is all I want.

OBAMA: GONEBORDERS: ClosedLANGUAGE: EnglishCULTURE: Constitution and the Bill Of RightsNO FREEBIES TO NON CITIZENSA BALANCED BUDGETTAX REFORM TERM LIMITS FOR SENATORS AND CONGRESS

Clearly you will consider the 2012 election a FAIL .......at least on those that I won't.... haha

I have question for you, no negative comments please, its just a question. Do you agree with any of these points?

OBAMA: GONEBORDERS: ClosedLANGUAGE: EnglishCULTURE: Constitution and the Bill Of RightsNO FREEBIES TO NON CITIZENSA BALANCED BUDGETTAX REFORM TERM LIMITS FOR SENATORS AND CONGRESS

Clearly you will consider the 2012 election a FAIL .......at least on those that I won't.... haha

Just a friendly rhetorical comment - not seeking or expecting a response -

It is puzzling to me how someone who deals with financial matters at the individual level never comments or justifies their position wrt national politics in terms of financial matters at the national level. I submit for your consideration two things, the first being my opinion on the use of fairness by the left today, and an article from Forbes on the Obama handling of the economy, which you seem to accept, inexplicably.