So, what is the enumerated list of Constitutional violations that this ban causes? It will be interesting to predict what the legal challenges will be.

Second Amendment?

Fifth Amendment?

Also, anyone know if Horne v. Department of Agriculture applies here?

Edited by ChicagoRonin70, 17 January 2018 - 01:24 AM.

“One can never underestimate the idiocy of those determined to be offended by things that don't affect their real lives in the slightest.” —Me

“Hatred is the sharpest sword; the desire for peace is armor made of willow leaves in the face of an enemy who despises you, as neither alone will stop a strike that is aimed at your neck.” —Samurai proverb

“An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life.” —Robert Heinlein

“I reserve the right to take any action necessary to maintain the equilibrium in which I've chosen to exist.” —Me

There was a follow up on this, apparently the bill passed with without quorum. Makes me wonder if the law is even valid then if quorum is a requirement for passing legislation.

Where is that information found at? Link?

“One can never underestimate the idiocy of those determined to be offended by things that don't affect their real lives in the slightest.” —Me

“Hatred is the sharpest sword; the desire for peace is armor made of willow leaves in the face of an enemy who despises you, as neither alone will stop a strike that is aimed at your neck.” —Samurai proverb

“An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life.” —Robert Heinlein

“I reserve the right to take any action necessary to maintain the equilibrium in which I've chosen to exist.” —Me

Has anyone considered how sadly ironic it is that one of the most gun unfriendly states is where the "shot heard round the world" happened? In fact, the Battle of Lexington and Concord was British Troops marching from Boston to Concord to seize a cache of arms, and they met the countries first Militia in battle.

Gun parts CONFISCATION begins in Massachusetts as state to order “bump stocks” destroyed or turned over to government

Massachusetts, like most other liberal states across the country, is not exactly a state that believes in or respects the Second Amendment rights of the people who live there. Rather, Massachusetts and the leftists who run it believe as the vast majority of liberal democrats in this country do: That the implementation of more gun laws and regulations is the best and most effective way to decrease gun-related crime.

Massachusetts’ most recent attack on the Second Amendment comes in the form of a letter that will soon be sent to all License to Carry (LTC) permit holders in the state from the Executive Office of Public Safety. The letter, which was originally uncovered by the Gun Owners Action League (GOAL) based in Northborough, explains that “Retention of a prohibited item [bump stock or trigger crank] beyond the 90 day grace period will expose the owner to criminal prosecution.” In other words, residents of Massachusetts are being forced to turn in their bump stocks without exception, even if they have no criminal history and obtained their firearm legally.