BP Unfiltered

MVPs Who Weren't All-Stars

If you watched the All-Star game on Tuesday—and judging by the ratings, that’s a pretty big “if”—you probably thought you were watching the best players Major League Baseball had to offer (except for some injured ones). After all, bringing the best in baseball together for our viewing pleasure is what the All-Star game is for, or ​​was for when it was still relevant. And since nothing can be better than the best, you're probably thinking, why even bother to see the second half of the season?

Well, here's a pretty persuasive reason: nothing is set in stone after the first few months. Only some of the best first-half players will also be among the best from now on. This is never more clear than it is when a player goes on to win the MVP award after an All-Star snub. You’d think the players selected by the BBWAA as the best in their leagues at the end of each season would also have been selected as one of the 30-something best in their leagues at the break, but surprisingly often, that hasn't been the case. The following players won MVP awards without making the All-Star team in the same season. I know, off-day posts are awesome! Don't worry, they're going to start games again tomorrow.

*Yeah, this was that Brady Anderson year. Almost as unbelievable as Brady Anderson hitting 50 HR in 1996: Brady Anderson finishing ninth in AL MVP voting in 1996. Offense was insane that year. AL teams scored 5.39 R/G, the most since the 1930s. For what it’s worth, Anderson was fifth in WARP.

*If all you remember about Gibson’s 1988 season is the way he limped around the bases after his famous World Series home run, you probably wouldn’t have guessed that he stole 26 bases and led the NL with 8.7 BRR that season. What a difference two functioning legs make.

*Stargell had a great first half, but I’m okay with the All-Star snub, since—thanks to an awful second half—his MVP win was so undeserved. Stargel won the MVP in 480 plate appearances, the fewest for any non-pitcher MVP in a non-strike season. He was worth 2.4 WARP. That’s the lowest WARP total for any non-pitcher MVP, but not the lowest WARP total, period. Least-valuable-MVP table time:

So, to recap: Stargell had an excellent first half, but it wasn’t enough to be an All-Star. Then he had an awful second half, and it was enough to be MVP.

Speaking of seasons that weren’t as good as contemporary voters thought they were, here’s the most Coors Field fact ever, courtesy of Bradley Ankrom: in 1995, Dante Bichette led the NL in hits, home runs, RBI, total bases, and slugging percentage, and he finished second to Barry Larkin in the NL MVP voting. He was worth 1.1 WARP. (Admittedly, a lot of that was his fielding’s fault.)

Hal Newhouser, 1945
First-half stats: 167 2/3 IP, 1.66 ERA, 6.0 K/9, 3.1 BB/9
andPhil Cavarretta, 1945
First-half stats: 341 PA, .368/.465/.510
Who made it instead: No one. There was a war on! But according to Wikipedia*, The Sporting News polled almost all the major-league managers, and they would’ve selected both Newhouser and Cavarretta had the game been played.

*Also according to Wikipedia: “Impresario Mike Todd floated the idea of holding the contest in, of all places, newly-liberated Berlin. Although baseball’s commissioner, Happy Chandler, was reportedly ‘intrigued’ by the idea, it was ultimately dismissed as impractical.”

Good stuff, Ben. The NL actually had co-MVPs in 1979, Stargell (who of course led the Pirates to a World Series win) and Hernandez (who led the league in batting average). So at least they only gave Pops *half* an MVP award for that season of his. Tidbit: the 39-year-old Stargell led all 1B in fielding percentage that year, but of course Hernandez won the gold glove (managers didn't know what Range Factor was back then, but they still had eyes).

I have no idea why WARP thinks that Jim Konstanty was below replacement level in 1950. Looking at his player card, that's because his ERA was 2.66 but his FRA was 4.79 and WARP uses FRA. OK, but that begs the next question why his FRA is so much worse. It'd be great if I could REALLY get a feel for the FRA calculation, but it sure doesn't match my intuition. As complicated as Fangraphs WAR and Baseball-Reference WAR are, I've been able to develop a feel for them due to extensive efforts to communicate how they are computed.