Who Remembers the Intifada?

Editorial, Challenge, issue 47,
[28 December 1997]

In early December U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright gave
Netanyahu & Co. a deadline for specific commitments toward
redeployment in the West Bank. This spurred the Israeli government
into a flurry of activity. For the first time since coming to power,
in fact, Netanyahu had to sit down and crack his own and other
ministerial heads about what exactly the final arrangement should
be. As of this writing there are still big question marks: What powers
will the Palestinians have? Which Israeli settlements (if any) will be
included in the Palestinian territory, and what status will they have?
Nevertheless, from the various maps that have come up for
discussionthose made by the defense establishment and another by
Ariel Sharona picture has emerged, and it bodes no good for the
Palestinians.

1) Israel intends to keep between 55% and 60% of the West Bank for
security purposes. It is significant that one of these maps (that
keeping 55%) came from the army. This institution stands outside the
political debate in Israel. In its deliberations both the right and
the left, coalition and opposition, find common ground. When the army
presents such a map, therefore, the strong implication is that the
Labor Party too accepts the concept behind it.

2) Occasional flashes of anger notwithstanding, the American position
remains soft on Israel. In a telephone conference with fifty or so
Jewish leaders on December 19, Albright reaffirmed that the US will
not itself define the areas that Israel needs for its security. Nor
will the administration, at this stage, put forth positions of its own
about the lines of the final arrangement. (Ha'aretz, Dec. 21, 1997.)

What may we conclude from these two points? The Palestinian
gamblethat they could trust in the good will of the Labor Party,
or as a last resort, in the assurances of the Americanshas come
to nothing. First, Israel's army favors a map much like what the late
Yitzhak Rabin had in mind. Now that the army has spoken, Labor will
find it very hard to move left of it. Second, the Americans have not
suddenly developed big hearts for the Palestinians. Their recent
toughness with Netanyahu derives from their need to push the process
forward, not from any central conviction about where it should go.

The various plans, all of which would leave the Palestinians less than
half the West Bank, are far removed from the 90% which Arafat promised
his people. Bibi & Co. are wrangling about much smaller
percentages, but from the palaces of the PA in Gaza one hears not a
whimper. For all anyone there seems to care, the Israelis might be
debating the future dimensions of Timbuktu. The Palestinian silence
may witness to something that many have long suspected: to the
denizens of those palaces, the figure 40% is nothing new.

And behold! Instead of raising Cain and canceling their meetings with
the Israeli side, the Palestinians increase their cooperation on
security issues. Arafat has found the salt to kosher this. He works
through the CIA. Thus there are now three major security apparatuses:
the Israelis, the Palestinians, and the CIA meet, converse, plan, and
issue papers as if they constituted an independent body entirely
separate from the many political entanglements. That is exactly what
Israel wants. Security cooperation - a friendlier term than
squelching the Palestinian opposition - has to pass through a
well-oiled machine that will operate independently of what Israel
commits or omits. This is precisely what we now see emerging.

Netanyahu's entry into office was first marked by friction with the
Palestinian side (remember the tunnel? Hebron? Har Homa?). Lately,
however, the Palestinian position has been swallowed up in the
policies of the American administration. This weakness receives
uncanny embodiment in the present condition of Arafat himself, who
appears too ill to speak.

Weakly and quietly too, the tenth anniversary of the Intifada slipped
by. No wonder. What's to celebrate? Dashed hopes? Pervasive
corruption? A regime that tortures its own people?

How then did they mark that tenth anniversary? Not by mass gatherings,
not by demonstrations! No, in the gray, sober, foot-slogging manner
that befits a bloated bureaucracy: they took a census. The UN and the
Europeans contributed millions of dollars to the Palestine Bureau of
Statistics in order to prepare this mighty deed. Here was sovereignty
in action. The Palestinians, whose number has been known only to God,
will continue to be registered in heaven alone, because no one is out
there counting the millions that Oslo left out. It is important,
nonetheless, to find out how many of them there are in the
Territories. Planning is essential, because in twenty years their
number will double, and they will have to make do with 40% of the
land.

One side makes maps, the other counts heads to fit into them. The
Palestinian opposition, one would hope, is made of sterner stuff!

But no, 'tis a blight that stoppeth not at strains. Hamas agreed to
defer the tenth anniversary of the Intifada for a week in order not to
embarrass Arafat, who was traveling in Europe. Luckily for all it
rained cats and dogs on the appointed day. Thus the powers of Nature
came to their aid, covering what in brighter daysand plainer
languagewould appear to be mere cowardice.

Cowardice does not build states! There is no doubt any longer but that
the Palestinians have lost again, lost big. But as long as the feeling
of wrong continues to rankle, the war is not over. A true leadership
will know this, and it will arise, for the situation demands it. This
the Intifada taught. If for no other reason, we should commemorate it
- with tumult and shouting. In the meantime, Happy New Year.

How to subscribe?

Please send a check (made out to Challenge) of $30, 20L, 50DM or 75 NIS
for locals to: POB 41199, Jaffa 61411, Israel. Other currencies should
be sent through a bank check in US dollars or a post office transfer.
Please write your address clearly.

If you just want a one time trial copy send us your name and address via
this e-mail: odaa@p-ol.com