SUBSCRIBE:

Russian human rights defenders injured in police raid

Share

Russian authorities should stop harassing a leading human rights group and investigate the legality of a raid on its Moscow office on June 21-22, 2013, Human Rights Watch said today.

Under the pretext that the group's lease agreement had been terminated, law enforcement officials forcibly occupied the office of the Movement for Human Rights. The police physically removed staff and their supporters from the premises, injuring at least seven of them.

“This outrageous move against the Movement for Human Rights is a part of the unprecedented crackdown by the Kremlin on its critics,” said Hugh Williamson, Europe and Central Asia Division director at Human Rights Watch.

The incident coincides with the peak of the “foreign agents” campaign, during which hundreds of nongovernmental organizations all over Russia have been were subjected to intrusive inspections. At least 62 face sanctions or warnings for failure to register as “foreign agents” and other alleged compliance failures.

The Movement for Human Rights along with several other leading rights groups challenged the legality of the inspections and refused to submit documents to the prosecutor's office for inspection. On April 18 a Moscow court found Lev Ponomarev, the group's leader, in breach of prosecutors' demands and fined him 2,000 rubles (US$61).

In the afternoon of June 21, a large group of police, Real Estate Committee officials, and private security agents entered the group's office and demanded that the staff vacate the premises. Journalists from NTV, a pro-governmental television channel instrumental in the Kremlin's smear campaign against civil society organizations, accompanied the officials.

The officials told the staff that the organization's lease agreement with the Moscow City Real Estate Department had been terminated and that a new tenant – a municipal social welfare center – was to move in shortly. The Movement for Human Rights has been located there since the 1990s under a discounted rent granted by the city.

Ponomarev told Human Rights Watch that on February 15, the group had received a three-month notice of lease termination from the landlord and immediately asked city hall for assistance to extend the lease.

He said that a reply from the deputy mayor dated May 24 said, “The Real Estate Department will revisit the issue of the lease prolongation after the debt [for the April and May rent] is paid.” The organization then paid rent for April, May, and June via wire transfer, and the funds were promptly deducted from their bank account and accepted by the recipient.

Staff members showed the deputy mayor's letter and proof of payment to Real Estate Committee officials on the scene on June 21. The officials dismissed the documents as irrelevant and demanded the staff leave immediately, saying they were following “an extrajudicial procedure.”

Evgeny Bobrov, a housing law expert and a member of Russia's Presidential Human Rights Council, noted that Russian law does not provide for an out-of-court eviction procedure. Russia's Ombudsman, Vladimir Lukin, told the Interfax news agency that city authorities and law enforcement officials “tried to unilaterally solve the issue, which is subject to bilateral dispute, without addressing a court of law. And therefore, it was arbitrary.”

Ponomarev told Human Rights Watch that he had called the demands to vacate “unlawful” and refused to leave. Private security agents and police then blocked the office entrance. They intimidated and threatened the staff, prevented them from using the bathroom, and forcibly removed most staff from the building.

The police and private security agents then searched the office and seized documents without a search warrant. Among other things, they went through case files of applicants to the European Court on Human Rights. Then they summoned workers to install new locks on the doors and sealed them. Ponomarev said that two plainclothes officers appeared to be in charge of the raid.

Around midnight, the private security agents and the police denied Lukin, the ombudsman, access, although under Russian law the ombudsman has a right go anywhere he chooses, including closed institutions. The private security agents also denied three lawyers representing the activists access to the building.

At about 1:30 a.m., riot police in body armor approached the building and an hour later stormed the office, destroying furniture and equipment, and stepping all over documents.

They threw the staff and their supporters still in the building on the floor, ignoring offers by several of them to leave the building voluntarily, dragged them along the corridors and down the stairs, and handed them over to the private security agents at the entrance to the building.

The security agents threw the activists down on the asphalt. Ponomarev said that unidentified plainclothes agents kicked and beat the activists as they were dragged through the halls and down the stairs, leaving seven of them, including himself, with bruises and other injuries.

“This lawless search followed vicious kicking, beating, and dragging of activists and cries out for a complete investigation,” Williamson said. “The plainclothes agents who carried out the beatings need to be identified and punished, and the police officers who collaborated and allowed the beatings need to be held responsible.”

Ponomarev told Human Rights Watch that despite his repeated demands, the group's representatives were not allowed to collect their equipment and documents from the premises until June 24. On June 27 Ponomarev filed official complaints with the investigative authorities and the prosecutor's office. According to the authorities, an investigation has been opened.

On June 26 the Presidential Human Rights Council called an emergency meeting to discuss the case, with the participation of state officials. At the meeting, an Interior Ministry representative said that an internal inquiry was being conducted but that “[a]ccording to preliminary assessment, no violations were found in the actions of police officers” and that riot police “were only present there to ensure public order.” City hall representatives did not attend the meeting despite the Council's request.

Following the meeting, Ponomarev met with Presidential Administration officials and presented case-related documents to them.

The search was a blatant violation of the rights to privacy and security of the person, Human Rights Watch said. It was also a gross interference with the right of victims to petition the European Court of Human Rights. Russia should comply with recommendations by authoritative intergovernmental institutions on the protection of human rights defenders and create a normal working climate for Russian activists.

In its 2008 Declaration on Council of Europe action to improve the protection of human rights defenders and promote their activities, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe urged member states to “take effective measures to prevent attacks on or harassment of human rights defenders, ensure independent and effective investigation of such acts and to hold those responsible accountable through administrative measures and/or criminal proceedings.”

The United Nations Human Rights Council in its March 2013 resolution urged member countries “to create a safe and enabling environment in which human rights defenders can operate free from hindrance and insecurity, in the whole country and in all sectors of society, including by extending support to local human rights defenders.”

“What happened to the Movement for Human Rights is clearly a case of political harassment, not a mere dispute over an office space,” Williamson said.

Since 2012, the Russian authorities have intensified a crackdown on freedom of expression, selectively casting certain kinds of criticism of the government as threats to state security and public stability and introducing significant restrictions to online expression and invasive surveillance of online activity.

Throughout the year there were reports of attacks, threats, censorship, arrests, and prison sentences against both journalists and ordinary citizens who had posted or shared politically sensitive information online.

The Russian authorities detained at least 61 people in different cities across the country for holding unauthorized protests ahead of the opening ceremony of the Winter Olympics in Sochi on 7 February 2014.

A new bill provides for the immediate blocking of websites with content regarded by the prosecutor’s office as extremist. Inciting hatred or terrorist acts are already grounds for blocking. Now, urging people to participate in unauthorized protests would also be viewed as "extremist."

Charges against dozens of protesters in connection with the protest on the eve of President Vladimir Putin’s 2012 inauguration are "inappropriate" and "disproportionate," according to a panel of independent experts. Twenty seven people are facing "mass rioting" charges in connection with the protest on May 6, 2012.

Russia is the sixth deadliest country in the world for journalists in the last 16 years. Moreover, as impunity for attacks on journalists in Russia remains the general rule and the vast majority of cases remain unsolved, the true tally could be even higher.

Freedom Forum monitored FoE during the elections as it concerns citizens' freedom of expression through the ballot box. Therefore, any action creating an unfavourable atmosphere for the elections is also a violation of freedom of expression.

A recent HKJA survey indicates a slight rise in the Hong Kong Press Freedom Index after two consecutive years of decline. Journalists on the ground believe that the situation has worsened in 2016, compared to the year before. HKJA chairperson Sham Yee-lan explained that the slight increase in the Press Freedom Index was likely to be related to the emergence of online media, which has led to some diversity in the industry.

This report presents the findings of a three-month study focused on mapping, observing and analysing online harassment of journalists in Hungary. The study aimed to identify the types of harassment journalists are subject to, which journalists are typically harassed, who the harassers are, and how journalists cope with harassment.

Combining both violent and nonviolent methods, the Communist Party's policies are designed to curb the rapid growth of religious communities and eliminate certain beliefs and practices, while also harnessing aspects of religion that could serve the regime's political and economic interests.

Many journalists increasingly practice self-censorship, fearing retribution from security forces, military intelligence, and militant groups. Media outlets in 2016 remained under pressure to avoid reporting on or criticising human rights violations in counterterrorism operations. The Taliban and other armed groups threatened media outlets and targeted journalists and activists for their work.

Chinese authorities' enforced disappearance of critics from Hong Kong and other countries in 2016 garnered headlines globally. Beijing's decision to interfere in a politically charged court case in Hong Kong in November undermined judicial independence and the territory's autonomy. In the ethnic minority regions of Xinjiang and Tibet, Beijing continued its highly repressive rule, curtailing political activity and many peaceful expressions of ethnic and religious identity.

Bangladesh witnessed a spate of violent attacks against secular bloggers, academics, gay rights activists, foreigners, and members of religious minorities in 2016. Several laws were proposed during the year to increase restrictions on freedom of expression.

Freedom Forum observed a relatively peaceful atmosphere for the media this year (2016) with a significant decline in the number of press freedom violations. FF recorded only 25 incidents of press freedom violations during 2016 versus 83 in 2015.

Pakistan is among the countries that do not properly investigate and prosecute crimes against media professionals. Because of the near absolute level of impunity, most of the people who attack, injure or even murder media journalists in Pakistan remain free.

2016 is a highly significant year for Cambodian democracy. Looking back, 2016 marks 25 years since the conclusion of the Paris Peace Agreements (the “Paris Agreements”), which brought an end to 20 years of conflict in the Kingdom of Cambodia (“Cambodia”) and laid the framework for a political settlement based on human rights and liberal democracy; looking forward, 2016 marks the unofficial start of the lead‐up to the local and national elections in 2017 and 2018, respectively, as political actors across the spectrum begin to position themselves.

In the 27 cases of journalists murdered for their work in India since CPJ began keeping records in 1992, there have been no convictions. More than half of those killed reported regularly on corruption. The cases of Jagendra Singh, Umesh Rajput, and Akshay Singh, who died between 2011 and 2015, show how small-town journalists face greater risk in their reporting than those from larger outlets, and how India's culture of impunity is leaving the country's press vulnerable to threats and attacks

Latin America is, by far, the most dangerous region of the world for environmental human rights defenders (EHRDs). The lack of effective guarantees of human rights protection in Latin American States has created this dire situation.

Violence against journalists in Europe increased in the second quarter of 2016, reports submitted to Index on Censorship’s Mapping Media Freedom platform show, as a government crackdown in Turkey intensified and protests turned violent in countries from France to Finland.

IFEX publishes original and member-produced free expression news and reports. Some member content has been edited by IFEX. We invite you to contact [email protected] to request permission to reproduce or republish in whole or in part content from this site.