The Prophet speaks here again against Jerusalem; for first, the Jews ought ever to have been severely reproved, as they were
given to many sins; and secondly, because there was always there some seed which needed consolation: and this has been the
way pursued, as we have hitherto seen, by all the Prophets. But we must also bear in mind, that the books now extant were
made up of prophetic addresses, that we might understand what was the sum
of the doctrine delivered.

The Prophet here makes this charge against the Jews, that they were polluted and become filthy. And he addresses Jerusalem, where the sanctuary was; and it might therefore seem to have been superior to other cities;
for God had not in vain chosen that as the place for his worship. But the Prophet shows how empty and fallacious was any boasting
of this kind; for the city
which God had consecrated for himself had polluted itself with many sins. The Prophet seems to allude to the ancient rites
of the law, which, though many, had been prescribed, we know, by God, that the people might observe a holy course of life:
for the ceremonies could not of themselves wash away their filth; but the people were instructed by these external things
to worship God in a holy and pure manner. As then they often washed themselves with water, and as they carefully observed
other
rites of outward sanctity, the Prophet derides their hypocrisy, for they did not regard the real design of the ceremonies.
Hence he says, that they were polluted, though in appearance they might be deemed the most pure; for they were defiled as
to their whole life.
106106 The first word, [מוראה], is rendered "rebellions” by Newcome and Henderson. The Vulgate is nearly the same, “provocatrix—provoking.” The verb is [מרא], once in Hiphil in Job 39:8; and to take it to be the same with [מרה], to rebel, is gratuitous. The context in Job shows its idea to be that of raising up or swelling; and Parkhurst very properly renders the participle here, swelling, arrogant, insolent; and this notion entirely corresponds with the character
given of the city in the next verse; being arrogant, it did “not hear the voice” of God. The verse may be rendered thus
— Woe to the arrogant and polluted,
The city, which is an oppressor! Then follows a specification as to her conduct,— She has not hearkened to the voice,
She has not received instruction;
In Jehovah has she not trusted,
To her God has she not drawn nigh. To “obey the voice,” as given in our version and by Newcome, is not quite correct; she was too arrogant even to hear or attend to the voice. “Correction,” as in our version, and by
Calvin, is rendered “instruction” by Newcome and Henderson; for [מוסר] has often this meaning. The Septuagint have παιδαιαν—discipline. But the same phrase occurs in verse 7, where the word necessarily means instruction, by way of
warning, communicated by the example of others.—Ed.

He adds that the city was היונה, eiune; some render it the city of dove, or, a dove; for the word has this meaning: and they take it metaphorically for a foolish
and thoughtless city, as we find it to be so understood in Hosea 7:11; where Ephraim was said to be a dove, because the people were void of reason and knowledge, and of their own accord exposed
themselves to traps and snares. Some then consider this place to have this meaning,—that Jerusalem, which ought to have been
wise, was yet wholly fatuitous and foolish. But it may be easily gathered from the context, that the Prophet means another
thing, even this,—that Jerusalem was
given to plunder and fraud; for the verb ינה, ine, signifies to defraud and to take by force what belongs to another; and it means also to circumvent as well as to plunder.
He therefore means no doubt, that Jerusalem was a city full of every kind of iniquity, as he had before called it a polluted
city; and then he adds an
explanation.

The Prophet in the first verse seems to have in view the two tables of the law. God, we know, requires in the law that his
people should be holy; and then he teaches the way of living justly and innocently. Hence when the Prophet called Jerusalem
a polluted city, he meant briefly to show that the whole worship of God was there corrupted, and that no regard for true religion
flourished there; for the Jews thought that
they had performed all their duty to God, when they washed away their filth by water. Such was the extremely foolish notion
which they entertained: but we know and they ought to have known that the worship of God is spiritual. He afterwards adds,
that the city was rapacious, under which term he includes every kind of injustice.

It follows, She heard not the voice, she received not correction. The Prophet now explains and defines what the pollution was of which he had spoken: for true religion begins with teachableness;
when we submit to God and to his word, it is really to enter on the work of worshipping him aright. But when heavenly truth
is despised, though men may toil much in outward rites,
yet their impiety discovers itself by their contumacy, inasmuch as they suffer not themselves to be ruled by God’s authority.
Hence the Prophet shows, that whatever the Jews thought of their purity at Jerusalem, it was nothing but filth and pollution.
He says, that they were unteachable, because they did not hear the Prophets sent to them by God.

This ought to be carefully noticed; for without this beginning many torment themselves in the work of serving God, and do
nothing, because obedience is better than sacrifice. If, then, we wish our efforts to be approved by God, we must begin with
faith; for except the word of God obtains credit with us, whatever we may offer to him are mere human inventions. It is, in
the second place, added, that they did not receive
correction; and this was no superfluous addition. For when God sees that we are not submissive, and that we do not willingly
come to him when he calls us, he strengthens his instruction by chastisements. He allures us at first to himself, he employs
kind and gentle invitations; but when he sees us delaying, or even going back, he begins to treat us more roughly and more
severely: for teaching without the goads of reproof would have no effect. But when God teaches and reproves in vain, it then
appears that our disposition is wicked and perverse. So the Prophet intended here to show the wickedness of his people as
extreme, by saying, that they heard not the voice nor received correction; as though he had said, that the wickedness of his people was unhealable, for they not only rejected the doctrine of salvation,
when offered, but also obstinately rejected all warnings, and would not bear any correction.

But we must bear in mind, that the Prophet had to do with that holy people whom God had chosen as his peculiar treasure. There
is therefore no reason why those who profess the name of Christians at this day should exempt themselves from this condemnation;
for our condition is not better than the condition of that people. Jerusalem was in an especial manner, as we have already
said, the sanctuary, as it were, of God: and yet we see how
severely the Prophet reproves Jerusalem and all its inhabitants. We have no cause to flatter ourselves, except we willingly
submit to God, and suffer ourselves to be ruled by his word, and except we also patiently bear correction, when his teaching
takes no suitable effect, and when there is need of sharp goads to stimulate us.

He afterwards adds, that it did not trust in the Lord, nor draw nigh to its God. The Prophet discovers here more clearly the spring of impiety—that Jerusalem placed not the hope of salvation in God alone;
for from hence flowed all the mass of evils which prevailed; because if we inquire how it is that men burn with avarice, why
they are insatiable, and why they wantonly
defraud and plunder one another, we shall find the cause to be this—that they trust not in God. Rightly then does the Prophet
mention this here, among other pollutions at Jerusalem, as the chief—that it did not put its trust in God. The same also is
the cause and origin of all superstitions; for if men felt assured that God alone is enough for them, they would not follow
here and there their own inventions. We hence see that unbelief is not only the mother of all the evil deeds by which men
willfully wrong and injure one another, but that it is also the cause of all superstitions.

He says, in the last place, that it did not draw nigh to God. The Prophet no doubt charges the Jews that they willfully departed from God when he was nigh them; yea, that they wholly
alienated themselves from him, while he was ready to cherish them, as it were, in his own bosom. This is indeed a sin common
to all who seek not God; but Jerusalem sinned far more grievously,
because she would not draw nigh to God, by whom she saw that she was sought. For why was the law given, why was adoption
vouchsafed, and in short, why had they the various ordinances of religion, except that they might join themselves to God?
‘And now Israel,’ said Moses, ‘what does the Lord thy God require of thee, except to cleave to him?’ God thus intended his
law to be, as it were, a sacred bond of union between him and the Jews. Now when they wandered here and there, that they might
not be
united to him, it was a diabolical madness. Hence the Prophet here does not only accuse the Jews of not seeking God, but
of withdrawing themselves from him; and thus they were ungovernable. The Lord sought to tame them; but they were like wild
beasts. It now follows—

106 The first word, [מוראה], is rendered "rebellions” by Newcome and Henderson. The Vulgate is nearly the same, “provocatrix—provoking.” The verb is [מרא], once in Hiphil in Job 39:8; and to take it to be the same with [מרה], to rebel, is gratuitous. The context in Job shows its idea to be that of raising up or swelling; and Parkhurst very properly renders the participle here, swelling, arrogant, insolent; and this notion entirely corresponds with the character
given of the city in the next verse; being arrogant, it did “not hear the voice” of God. The verse may be rendered thus
— Woe to the arrogant and polluted,
The city, which is an oppressor! Then follows a specification as to her conduct,— She has not hearkened to the voice,
She has not received instruction;
In Jehovah has she not trusted,
To her God has she not drawn nigh. To “obey the voice,” as given in our version and by Newcome, is not quite correct; she was too arrogant even to hear or attend to the voice. “Correction,” as in our version, and by
Calvin, is rendered “instruction” by Newcome and Henderson; for [מוסר] has often this meaning. The Septuagint have παιδαιαν—discipline. But the same phrase occurs in verse 7, where the word necessarily means instruction, by way of
warning, communicated by the example of others.—Ed.