Mike Dierken wrote:
>Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
>>As for the "tags" attribute discussion, you guys just
>>invented a "class" attribute.
>> Well, that also was one suggestion, but 'class' is mostly for user interface
> rendering, rather than purely semantic meaning. But it may not be necessary
> or workable to have a 'purely semantic' attribute. Some web crawling system
> would likely be able to figure out the semantic equivalence if enough people
> used a small enough set of values for similar things.
If you look at a lot of the current icroformats work, they are using classes
on regular elements rather than 'rel' on links.
http://www.microformats.org/blog/2005/10/19/more-than-styling/http://microformats.org/wiki/hcalendarhttp://microformats.org/wiki/xoxo
As Tantek likes to remind people: don't reinvent.
~fantasai