A letter to President Putin

I write these lines to you on board the Greenpeace vessel Arctic Sunrise, as we leave the Russian economic zone waters north of the Kola Peninsula. You may be aware that for the last 5 days people from our ship were engaging in a peaceful protest against the planned start up of drilling for oil on the Russian Arctic shelf by Gazprom’s Prirazlomnaya platform. I want to personally assure you that these protests were in no way directed against the interests of Russia, of people working on the platform, or even against the company of Gazprom. These protests are part of a global campaign that we have been carrying out for a number of years, protesting against oil drilling in the Arctic Ocean, from Greenland to Alaska.

Mr. President. It is my deeply held conviction that oil production in the Arctic is counter to the environmental and economic security of Russia. Two weeks ago I had the privilege of meeting with your minister of Environment and Natural Resources, Mr Donskoy. I presented him the findings of the group of respected Russian scientists, who concluded that oil production even on a comparatively near- shore platform such as Prirazlomnaya, carries a high risk of severe contamination of the fragile Arctic marine and coastal environment, while the ability to clean up such a spill is extremely low, due to the climactic and geographic conditions of the region.

Mr. President, I would like to emphasize again, that this is not unique to Russia. Similar analyses have yielded similar results for oil production on the Greenlandic and US Arctic shelves.

The Minister also received from us a report presented earlier this year which analyses the economic feasibility of oil production on the Arctic shelf. It is clear that the production costs are so high as to make the venture unprofitable. Indeed, instead of contributing positively to the Russian economy, it is more likely to become a drain on Federal, and perhaps regional budgets.

Ironically, we are just now passing close to the Shtokman gas field – a project which has now hit what seems to be a final obstacle and is in the process of dissolution, testifying its economic unfeasibility.

Mr. President I want to be very clear, we are not calling for stopping the use of petroleum products today. However it is clear that global oil production will not be able to be maintained much longer at the current level. We will be forced to develop and implement alternative, sustainable sources of energy. Russia possesses an immense wealth of such sources – from wind and solar to biomass and geothermal, as well as a huge potential for energy conservation which can provide cheaper and quicker energy equivalents than it planned to obtain in the Arctic offshore – Russia is capable to become the LEADING country in the world for developing clean energy for the future.

Mr. President, I am deeply concerned that the decision to develop oil fields on the Arctic shelf risks devastating the environment, while closing the channels of investment towards renewable energy sources. I completely support the sentiment you expressed at the congress of the All-Russian public organization “Business Russia” when you said: "It is obvious for us that the ambitious goals that we set for ourselves can only be achieved within the framework of a new model of economic growth, whose driver will be not the resource complex, but a powerful high technology-based business…”

Opening extremely expensive oil fields in Arctic offshore doesn’t help to stop the dependence of Russian national budget on oil and gas and on volatile oil and gas prices on the international market.

Mr. President, one other aspect needs to be mentioned. The climate crisis that the scientific community has been warning about for years is upon us. The data released 3 days ago by scientists from the US National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) clearly shows that the extent of the Arctic ice cover is at its all-time minimum – frightening proof of the fact that the geophysical profile of our planet is undergoing rapid and violent changes, which threaten all of our futures, and indeed are already causing humanitarian catastrophes, both in my homeland, where droughts are devastating the African continent, as well as in yours, Mr. President, where we witnessed widespread forest fires two years ago. I am sure you agree with me, Mr. President, that it is not fair, that people of the developing world who have contributed least to carbon emissions are the ones that are already paying the first and most brutal impacts of climate change.

Part of the mission of Greenpeace is to bring to the public eye the destruction that our planet is suffering. Our ship will now proceed to the edge of the Arctic ice north of the Norwegian coast where together with representatives of the scientific community and representatives of the global public we will document and bear witness to the reality of the disappearing of the Earth’s ice shield.

Mr. President, I am reminded of your words in the interview to a Canadian newspaper in 2000. You said “I’ve always admired people who devote their lives to environmental problems, I’ve watched with astonishment as a group of people on a little boat oppose a military or industrial ship. I must say it inspires only sympathy.” Mr. President, I hope that you understand that our protest at Prirazlomnaya was done with the spirit of taking personal action that you say you admire. In the same spirit I would like to extend an invitation to you. I would be honored if you joined us on board the Arctic Sunrise in the upcoming trip to the retreating edge of the Arctic ice, so you could see for yourself the beauty of this remarkable region, the risk that it is exposed to, and hopefully be inspired to use your position to protect it against destruction.

We need global leadership to ensure that the Arctic is declared a global sanctuary and I appeal to you to step forward to provide it.

@greensavior
I think you're wasting your time criticizing the director of Greenpeace. He is just a pawn in the game. Perhaps it is more inte...

@greensavior
I think you're wasting your time criticizing the director of Greenpeace. He is just a pawn in the game. Perhaps it is more interesting analysing and dissociate Greenpeace and the fights for our planet. After all Greenpeace is just a group of individuals paid to do their job the best they can. It doesn't mean they can't be wrong. I'm more worried about their tendencies to be an Apple of environmentalism wannabe with a close centralized ecosystem.

Like Mac OS X they use something public, the fight for environment, enclosed it with the Greenpeace trademark and make a business of it without anybody being able to say a word about it which is wrong because the fate of our planet belong to everybody. It works great of course with victories and all but it kinda sound out of tune. Anybody smart can feel it.

I've met few heroes in my life. Unfortunaltely, they live like shit, eating shit. People alone bearing cause too heavy for ones shoulders without any support. Greenpeacers CAN make a living out of their fights, they can afford attorneys and all so few critics, they can bear it.

If people wants to know what Greenpeace is, just read the job offer. I'm sure there is load of great individual but there are merely employees selected to work for a company. There is no hope in that. Just know there are looking for intern to tweet good words and acid joke on Facebook. Come on, there is nothing more to expect than having them doing their work the best they can to slow down the death of our planet and Take advantage of the precious Time they gave us to show people there is a better way to live, having less, being more.

I was wondering aswell if DOCTOR Naidoo, after having lead such great actions in the cu...

no technical problems? I still see a duplicate :)

I was wondering aswell if DOCTOR Naidoo, after having lead such great actions in the culminating in Naidoo inviting Putin to board a Greenpeace ship, could soon be found hanging on the Noble Discoerer...what do you guys think?

Sun Wu

PS: being the first time captain during christening of Rainbow Warrior III and on her maiden-voyage is definately a great honour, correct?

Therefor I would like to include Joel Stewart, owner of the El Remanso to the list of powerful voices for our fragile earth...another remarkable CV definately belonging somerwhere close to DOCTOR Naidoo's and Michael Pauli's

What we fight is not some individuals, it's a way of functioning inherited of a money design society and military organisation. Greenpeace t...

What we fight is not some individuals, it's a way of functioning inherited of a money design society and military organisation. Greenpeace thinks that the goals justify the means. It is logical for environmentalists which job is to preserve the worlds capacity to do business with its social injustice. Kumi Naidoo used to say environment and social is two side of the same coin. I liked this thought. But now i believe the world is not a coin and that social and environment are seamlessly connected. Now, I really think the means determine the goal. It actually determines more than that, it determines the well being of minds and body, the relation between people.

Actually, what I don't understand why Greenpeace adopt so openly this liberal stance at a moment when civil movements that redefine the way we should consider nature emerge. Institution never proved to be good in innovation, I think than all this trendy communication is just trying to hide the truth. Greenpeace is outdated. Like Madonna it's trying to appear provocative but it's mainly good in business.

I am happy hearing from you, I always think about your words for a while making sure I understand you correct...
...

Hey Greenisjustacolor,

I am happy hearing from you, I always think about your words for a while making sure I understand you correct...

I am neglecting the Internet a little at the moment, we just bought the Elise-Marie, now we the days and night at the shipyard.

This beautiful lady is 108 years old, so we had to make sure to know what we buy...think we found a nice little boat, powered by a redone 6-cylinder Deutz, today we pulled the shaft to replace the shaft-bearings...just to make sure everything is in good working condition it the situations we rely on our old lady.

Sunday we planned to have a day off, so I will have had time to think about your words, maybe finding more thoughts of yours.

Sun Wu

Ps: we are currently looking for a good bosun.

PPS: have you heard, now Greenpeace is fighting for the right to express yourself...the evil Shell seems, without having read the blog, to show disrespect towards this fragile human right.

Unfortunately companies like Gazprom and almost all big drilling companies over the world does not care about environment at all and they need to earn...

Unfortunately companies like Gazprom and almost all big drilling companies over the world does not care about environment at all and they need to earn only a lot of money...I think that this letter won`t have any influence on Putin but there is no other way but fight!