You'll recall that the counter-cultural revolution
of the 1960s was largely about the promotion of mysticism, pagan spirituality,
and socialism. Many 60s radicals grew up to become educators, reporters, elected
officials, corporate officers, and leaders in the radical foundations now
implementing sustainable development policies. To drastically understate the
case: It's a big problem.
The end game of sustainable development is global governance. If you doubt my
claim, then consider the words of the Commission on Global Governance, an
organization allied with the United Nations:

The environment, perhaps more than any other issue, has helped to crystallize
the notion that humanity has a common future. The concept of sustainable
development is now widely used and accepted as a framework within which all
countries, rich and poor, should operate. The aspect that particularly concerns
us is the global governance implications.[1] [emphasis mine]

After the Brazil Earth Summit, President Bill Clinton created the President's
Council on Sustainable Development. As DeWeese explains, the Clinton
Administration side-stepped Congress to approve the sustainable development
agenda and implement its policies in America:

All cabinet officials had to do was change some wording of existing programs and
reroute already-approved funding to begin to implement the agenda-without
Congress and without debate. Former Commerce Secretary Ron Brown told a meeting
of the President's Council that he could implement 67% of the Sustainable
Development agenda in his agency with no new legislation. Other agencies like
Interior, EPA, HUD and more did the same thing. To help it all along, Clinton
issued a blizzard of Executive Orders.[2]

Some of the groups pushing the sustainable development agenda include Planned
Parenthood, the Sierra Club, the National Education Association, and a host of
government bureaucrats serving both Republican and Democrat administrations.

Americans are watching the destruction of free-market capitalism under our most
socialistic, left-wing administration ever. Yet, in my second book, published in
1995, I warned of this and quoted Maurice Strong, who was head of the 1992 Earth
Summit in Rio. I'll repeat his words to point out that what is happening in
America is a long-planned transformation of America into a socialist nation:
"Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations
collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?"[3]

He also extolled the need to destroy the concept of individual sovereign
nations:

It is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by
individual nation-states, however powerful. It is a principle which will yield
only slowly and reluctantly to the imperatives of global environmental
cooperation.[4]

In a corollary to Strong's position, Helen Caldicott of the Union of Concerned
Scientists has declared the "horrors" of free-market capitalism:

Free enterprise really means rich people get richer. They have the freedom to
exploit and psychologically rape their fellow human beings in the
process…Capitalism is destroying the earth.[5]

It is not only free-market capitalism they seek to destroy but Christianity
itself, since the Protestant Reformation is what gave birth to free-market
capitalism. Bible-minded Christians are further enemies of these globalist goals
because Christians do not believe in the worship of nature as does the
pantheistic, pagan spiritualism behind the movement.

By destroying the influence of Biblical Christianity within a culture,
globalists remove their main obstacle to socialism, radical environmentalism,
active euthanasia through socialized medicine, compulsory abortion, the end of
parental authority, the elimination of an armed populace, private property,
homosexuality (homosexuals are favored because they do not reproduce and add to
world population), and the indoctrination of our children with their worldview.
Peter Singer, who teaches ethics at Princeton University, makes this clear:
"Christianity is our foe…. we must destroy the Judeo Christian religious
tradition."[6]

THE
WEEKEND INTERVIEW OCTOBER 11, 2008 Maurice Strong The U.N.'s Man of Mystery Is
the godfather of the Kyoto treaty a public servant or a profiteer?By CLAUDIA
ROSETT - Mr. Strong may have left the U.N. behind, but his current office is
a penthouse suite in a building that houses at least three U.N. agencies (UNIDO,
UNFPA and UNHCR), plus such diplomatic tenants as the embassies of Mozambique,
Cyprus, and the Bahamas, as well as the Venezuelan defense attaché. He received
me at his nearby apartment wearing a striped blue polo shirt, dark slacks and in
his stocking feet. There were photos of Mr. Strong posing amid a multitude of
world leaders at the Rio summit, and a close-up of Mr. Strong gazing into the
camera beside a smiling Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. The latter photo
was taken in her office a few years ago, when "I went to brief her on a couple
of things."

Veteran U.N. bureaucrat Maurice Strong of
Canada is being positioned as the next U.N. Secretary-General. He founded the
U.N. Environmental Program, which has an "Environmental Sabbath" project that
aims to set aside a day of the week as a day of rest for the earth, not God. The
project encourages young people to sit around a tree and meditate. Strong, an
associate of Vice President Albert Gore, has openly speculated about a collapse
of Western industrial society being necessary to usher in a more
environmentally-sustainable civilization. He is working with former Soviet
President Mikhail Gorbachev to develop an "Earth Charter," another U.N. treaty,
to save the planet and the earth spirit "Gaia" from plunder. Gore himself writes
about "Gaia," the earth spirit or Goddess, in his own book, Earth in the
Balance. According to this religious worldview, the interests of plants, animals
and things are put above the needs of human beings. The use of natural resources
becomes blasphemy against the earth spirit "Gaia."
http://www.usasurvival.org/next-sg.html