United States v. Giannini

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Edward J. Garcia United States District Court Judge

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RESETTING MOTION HEARING

The Hon. Edward J. Garcia

Ms Giannini, by and through counsel Krista Hart, and the government, by and through counsel Assistant U.S. Attorney Steve Lapham, stipulate and agree that the hearing date currently set for March 19, 2010, be vacated and reset to April 23, 2010, at 10:00 a.m.

On March 5, 2010, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the indictment with the hearing set for March 19, 2010. The parties have discussed the matter and would like to put the case over to April 23rd for a couple reasons. First, the government would like more time to respond. Second, the parties are trying to work out discovery issues and trying to determine who, if anyone, would be necessary should an evidentiary hearing be necessary. The additional time will allow the parties to settle some issues prior to a hearing on the motion. For these reasons, the parties request the Court vacate the hearing currently set for March 19, 2010, and reset it to April 23, 2010, at 10:00 a.m.

ORDER

Good cause appearing, the hearing set for March 19, 2010, is vacated and the matter is reset to April 23, 2010, 10:00 a.m. for a hearing on the motion to dismiss.

Our website includes the first part of the main text of the court's opinion.
To read the entire case, you must purchase the decision for download. With purchase,
you also receive any available docket numbers, case citations or footnotes, dissents
and concurrences that accompany the decision.
Docket numbers and/or citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a
legal proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision. If the document contains a simple affirmation or denial without discussion,
there may not be additional text.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.