The Democratic National Committee has been playing everyone all along. They were desperately banking on one of three Republican candidates becoming a Presidential hopeful. They narrowed the field to Ted Cruz, Ben Carson and Donald Trump. The plan? To create a “Pied Piper” out of one of the three, using them to represent extremist views to undermine the Republican candidacy.

According to a Wikileaks post (you’ll find it on the tab with attachments where you can download a PDF of the e-mail) as part of their big October blowout ahead of the U.S., Presidential elections on November 8th, the e-mails from the Democratic National Committee revealed that they wanted a “Pied Piper” spouting the most extremist views from the Republican party to become the front-runner. The sole purpose of having said “Pied Piper” in place was for destroying their reputation, having old dirt dug up and used to smear their name, and to make it easy for Hillary Clinton to take the seat in the Oval Office.

According to the e-mail, which was circulated to Hillary Clinton’s campaign team and the Democratic National Committee, the idea was to setup and undermine whoever the Republican party had from their pool of candidates.

The goal, according to the DNC, was to get someone selected that would be an extreme representation of the Republican party (like Trump) and then undermine them by propping them up with extremist views that would divide people and potentially push moderates away (such as polarizing views on immigration reform and foreign policy) and then “muddy” the waters with salacious and tawdry material spread through the media to create consistent scandals any time Clinton’s campaign came under the attack (like Trump making unsavory comments while the mic was hot during an Access Hollywood interview 11 years ago).

The whole Presidential campaign comes across as a social engineering experiment and not like two rightful candidates vying for office who actually deserve it based on what they will do for the American people.

According to the leaked e-mails, Clinton’s campaign managers and the Democrats had no plans on elevating Clinton as a vote-worthy candidate based on policies and merit, but essentially she would be pushed through on deescalating the worth of her Republican opponent. In the e-mail to the DNC members, they write…

“As we all know, the right wing attack machine has been building its opposition research on Hillary Clinton for decades. The RNC et al has been telegraphing they are ready to attack and do so with reckless abandon. One way we can respond to these attacks is to show how they boomerang onto the Republican presidential field. The goal, then, is to have a dossier on the GOP candidates on the likely attacks HRC will face. […]

“In this regard, any information on scandals or ethical lapses on the GOP candidates would serve well. We won’t be picky.”

Part of the DNC’s plan appears to have backfired, though.

The American people are absolutely tired of the corruption and backroom politics, something that has tarnished the spirit of democracy and undermined the values that citizens would like to see represented by candidates running for President.

Worse yet is that the media have proven to be part of the whole ordeal, as revealed in the original DNC leaks back in June, where some journalists had their content checked first by the DNC before going to print to ensure it stayed on message, as reported by Zero Hedge.

There doesn’t appear to be any turnaround from this plan already put into play by the DNC, and some people will likely either vote for Trump out of no confidence or not vote at all. One thing is for sure, Trump’s campaign was part of the Democrat’s plan the whole time. I’m sure many Republican voters are feeling like “Kaz” from Metal Gear right about now.

Spread The Anger

Related

Billy has been rustling Jimmies for years covering video games, technology and digital trends within the electronics entertainment space. The GJP cried and their tears became his milkshake. Need to get in touch? Try the Contact Page.

Hmm put in my 2 pence worth as it follows on in the other article regarding did he, didn’t he of a Anti-GG critic.

The term is innuendo is double meaning, I could say the game BOMB anybody would flip out because I said BOMB in our scared world.

the game didn’t sold well so it BOMB. You see again it all on hear say, she said “you grabbed my pussy and told friends to smell your fingers”

That was 10 years ago, people have gone to jail on a fucking Hear say that worries me.

You need actual proof that a crime was committed.

J’accuseteau

Sorry folks, Democrats didn’t trick you into picking the shit-stained bed you people now find yourselves sleeping in. You did that all on your own. All this e-mail states is a confidence that conservatives would pick an extremist to represent their party, and guess what, they did! It doesn’t take some great puppet master to make Donald Trump act the fool. Don’t whine about “rigged” elections or try to paint the clown’s candidacy is some grand conspiracy. Take your loss with a little dignity, eh?

Yeah, I’m sure that explains why every person I’ve talked to supports Trump, before I even talked to them about it. I only talk to people who are nice, intelligent and reasonable.

I’m glad I didn’t have to deal with close friends suddenly deciding to cut ties over something as trivial as political bullshit.

I should point out that none of us live in the United States. We all live in different countries around the world. So maybe it’s something that’s only more obvious when you’re not drowning in U.S. mainstream media propaganda.

To be clear, I don’t really “support Trump”. I still can’t tell if he’s just part of the bullshit. What upsets me is that so many people are hating Trump and beating his supporters ONLY because the media tells them to, and usually by using a reason that makes no logical sense.

America boasts itself as a free country, but it’s clear you can’t even express your opinion there without other people destroying you. There’s no room for civil discussion, you’re either for or against. Where’s the “free speech” in that?

When it comes to “discussing before deciding” and people who “decide immediately and refuse to change position”, I will always pick the former.

It’s depressing to know that so many people will act if the media tells them to. Doesn’t anyone find it strange that the media almost entirely focuses on attacking a single candidate? All candidates should be under scrunity.

People are so focused on Trump being racist and sexist, that they don’t seem to ask themselves if Hillary is also racist and sexist.

durka durka

“hey narrowed the field to Ted Cruz, Ben Carson and Donald Trump. The plan? To create a “Pied Piper” out of one of the three, using them to represent extremist views to undermine the Republican candidacy.”

What part of this sounds unbelievable to you? You got a dumb fuck called george bush, then you get 3 more dumbfucks and all the dumbfuck republicans vote for them.

Democrats “republicans are crazy look for who they vote, support gay and trans rights”

With retarded rednecks like that in the red states, they only had to give them literally Hitler and they would vote for him…TO GET TO THOSE DAMN LIBERALS WHO DESTROY THIS GREAT COUNTRY!!

This kind of polarizing attitude has lead to this, yes you were played like fucking fools and i told ya dont support the extremist you wont stick it to the establishment, the establishment will simply use that as “see? now you gotta vote for us, because anyone that is not us is worse”

Which is why everyone should vote for 3rd parties so they wont be able to play the polarization game anymore.

This is true. A vote for the third-party in this case is a vote for Clinton, because most moderates are going to vote for Clinton or not vote at all, and most Leftists will also vote Clinton. So the people not voting for Trump or the people voting third-party will just sway the dial toward Clinton, who will have majority of the votes.

C G Saturation

B, but Star Trek says you should vote for Clinton and not third parties! Or else their ideals will never be realized!

J’accuseteau

Better a Star Trek future than a Blade Runner future, which is what you get with the other guy.

durka durka

and what is the point of giving it to trump really? In the end Clinton is gonna win and if trump somehow manages to win, the whole world will laugh at usa. You wont be sticking it to the establishment you will be proving that usa is filled with hateful stupid morons, then the establishment will pop in and say “See? Trump is a moron we told you not to vote for him, now vote for us, of course the democracts will use that and bush to prove that their term is better than any term under the crazy republicans, so they will win in the future again and again and again.

Just the 2 players switching sides, but with the gigantic fuck up that trump will cause the democrats will keep on winning, corporatism and PC is better than an economic collapse or a president that wont stop causing diplomatic incidents…oh and all those who defend trump like crazy, if he wins, the whole world will criticize him and make usa look retarded for choosing him.

C G Saturation

I’ve been trying to tell people the two party sytem sounds like bullshit for years and years, but people always defended it. “It gives us a choice!” or whatever. Those same people are probably kicking themselves hard right now.

The way I see it, what’s to stop two groups from colluding behind the scenes? If it was a huge number of groups with equal chance to win, then collusion would be more difficult to imagine. But just two? It’s easy to stage a fake contest with only two participants.

Especially when you consider that most things are owned by the same few companies now. Who’s to say the two main political parties aren’t working for the same single interest?

durka durka

“The way I see it, what’s to stop two groups from colluding behind the scenes”

Nothing which is why they do and you need more parties.

J’accuseteau

Johnson and Stein stand as an argument that America can’t put together even ONE third party that isn’t a complete clown car, let alone a “huge number”…

durka durka

There is it is third parties and you have to support them, it wont change anytime soon but when those parties start getting 10% they will be talked more and gain more popularity. You are not voting for them in order to win, you voting for them so they can criticize both and have a middle ground between the two parties.

C G Saturation

The whole system is screwed. Whenever I look at politics, I can’t help but think “almost all of this has absolutely nothing to do with leadership, management, economy, etc”. The whole thing seems like a farce to distract us while they steal riches for themselves at our expense.

durka durka

that is EXACTLY what it is but with very slow progress and change. In order to have the best leaders you need philosophers because they let their biases aside and think outside the box without misconceptions. Instead of that you got populist manipulator number 3424254 saying few words here and there and getting the votes of the stupid public. Which is why Plato wanted only those who have finished the academy and are philosophers to be able to vote not every redneck plumber and hairdresser.

fnd

lol the Democrats where afraid of Jeb, how stupid can they be?

Bitterbear

You should do some research on why Clinton has a large lead on Hispanic voters. The interesting thing is that lead is pretty low among Latinos who have English as a dominant language:

Well, aside from the fact that NBC owns Telemundo and Univision is owned by Haim Saban who is moist for Hillary.

C G Saturation

Yeah, I have a friend in Mexico who complains about how everything over there is openly anti-Trump, in a celebratory fashion.

It’s all good and fine if people don’t like Trump for legitimate reasons, but it’s really sad if the only reason they don’t like him is “because the TV said so”, or something equally shallow, like “Hillary has a vagina”.

Media has created generations of people with the complete inability to think for themselves. They believe it’s their own opinion, but it’s not.

durka durka

I have not bothered checking if its true but from what i heard trump has said alot of stuff about mexicans so why would they not openly hate him? Also yes thats the point of tv and the media to tell you what to think and believe. The original use of newspapers was oligarchs slandering people they dont like.

Wow man. You claim to hate both candidates, but the more I see of your drivel, the more you certainly bash on Trump far more than you bash on Hillary, in fact I rarely see you bashing Hillary

Every time there’s a Trump related article, you’re IMMEDIATELY there throwing jabs at him

Your hatred and bias towards Trump is the same kind of hatred that comes from Hillary supporters

Just saying =)

J’accuseteau

Yeah, funny how countries tend to push back against people who demonize them at every turn, huh?

giygas

All of this collusion and comic book villain scheming on a massive scale and yet they still can’t hold a lead over the orange-faced idiot from The Apprentice. Trying too hard or not trying nearly hard enough?

C G Saturation

I’m sure they will find a way to make the entire election irrelevant.
I still can’t help but think the whole thing is a farce.

anopolis

I used to think career politicians were about as evil as it gets…but now I’m thinking its modern day journalists. at least with the politics you pretty much assume everyone involved is dirty…but these asswipes claim to want truth..claim they have integrity.

C G Saturation

They’re still peas of the same pod.

C G Saturation

What a corrupt shitfest. Meanwhile, the country with the world’s largest porn industry is upset that Trump finds females attractive. But rape’s perfectly okay.

durka durka

or fox news playing it family values while its a backdoor blowjob to career express train.

C G Saturation

I always thought Fox News was shit. Really can’t trust the media. Even if they might seem like they’re on your side, they’re probably getting ready to stab you in the back.

durka durka

fox was never on the side of gamers.

Mr.Towel

Alien side boob!

Ta-er al-Asfer

“finds females attractive” isn’t the same as explaining how he uses his celebrity to sexually assault women

but OK

C G Saturation

People throw the term “sexual assault” around so much it means almost nothing now. You realize “sexual assault” means there must be a victim, right?

If it really was “sexual assault”, there’d be victims coming forward to take Trump down, ESPECIALLY in this social climate where bashing Trump is very much encouraged, and supporting Trump gets YOU bashed, robbed, ridiculed.

I’m sure plenty of people would pay a fortune to anyone with a legitimate reason to shut Trump down. But if I recall correctly, the only person who claimed Trump “sexually assaulted” them, didn’t actually exist. Meanwhile, there are plenty of victims complaining about Bill Clinton, but are being ignored.

For a rich person in a powerful position like Trump, it’s rare that there seem to be so few legitimate complaints. But nobody seems to care about that, and are more than willing to champion someone who has a huge still-growing record of undeniably terrible misdeeds and has already said she will attack other countries as soon as she gets elected.

Besides, talking to someone in private about something doesn’t mean they actually do it in reality. If that constituted a crime, I’m sure almost all humans, including you, would be in jail for PRIVATELY and merely expressing a desire to kill, engage in sexual acts, or anything that someone might deem “offensive”.

Above all this, it’s still completely irrelevant to the fact that America is about to go down the drain. There are much more important problems than Trump’s sexuality. And his sexuality has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH “LAUNCHING NUCLEAR WEAPONS”.

What I find most interesting is that someone felt the need to (illegally?) record a private locker room conversation with Trump 11 years ago, and kept it this long with the possible intent of using it against Trump if he ever did anything they didn’t like. Imagine what kind of dirt those people gather on everyone else. They must have a huge archive of stuff to use against people when the need arises.

You may think yourself safe now, but one day, if you happen to cross the path of those assholes for whatever reason, you’ll regret you said or did something a long time ago that could be easily taken out of context. People probably can’t empathise with this because they think it won’t happen to them.

C G Saturation

One more thing I’d like to say:
I think the real reason people hate Trump is because he says, “we have problems, and we need to fix them”.

People hate that, because they don’t want their illusion of happiness shattered. They prefer to wait until it’s too late and they can’t deny it anymore. I know this because people always attack me if I point out problems. They only want to hear positives.

On the other hand, voting for Hillary is like saying, “we’re such a great progressive country that we can elect a woman as president”. It keeps the illusion alive.

In reality, things are getting pretty serious for the U.S. Widespread corruption, failing infrastructure, huge budget deficit, liberal agenda dismantling society, the death of the middle class, etc.

People say Trump is an extremist, but extreme situations call for extreme solutions. I don’t think I’ve heard him say anything that didn’t sound suitably proportionate to real issues the U.S. is facing.

Ta-er al-Asfer

Take a seat, you dumb motherfucker. Grabbing a pussy without consent is assault.

Mr.Towel

Well, if we’re appealing to semantics and rhetoric:

1 – The supporting wife of a rapist is definitely not better.

2 – Saying that you grab pussy is not actually grabbing pussy, it can be as much as gloating as when women gloat they stole a kiss. Both can be construed as sexual assault (or not) depending on the nuances of the situation.

lol, another moronic foam-at-the-mouth who believes that words are the equivalent of physical abuse

tracy

The operative word was ‘they let him’. LET. consent. sexual assault is a crime. there is no crime if there is consent. When you act like we women have no agency or power or voice to consent, and you have to think for us and tell us what sexual assault is according to your definition, when it clearly isn’t, and YOU ARE A MAN mansplaining to us, you’re the oppressor.

Ta-er al-Asfer

He bragged about getting away with it without consent. I don’t need a grammar lesson. Dude straight up enjoys sexually assaulting women. Sorry you refuse to accept it.

giygas

Watch out: Everybody’s playing the guilt-by-association game right now and to be seen supporting either Trump or the Clintons is to be seen supporting sexual abuse. Suffice to say, a lot of people are going be in the closet and pretending to vote for the pothead that doesn’t know what Aleppo is.