<quoted text>ROFL! So conservatives outnumber liberals in 47 out of 50 states, and nationally.So what's your problem, conservatives? Unpatriotic? Unconcerned? Unregistered? Unable to read a ballot? Prefer to continue to lie on your couch and watch TV on election day?Of course, considering the 2012 Republican slate of candidates, I can see why you would not be willing to vote for any of them.

I am appauled they are going to allow Gays in the Boy Scouts. It is just plain wrong. What has happened to our morals? Obama thinks it's just OK to do that. I wonder if he would like his daughters around a Lesbian! How can such a smart man be so dumb?

I am also appauled about the gun control issue, too. The bad people are going to have guns I don't care what they do about gun control. I don't know what any person needs with an assault rifle but I don't think they should take away our right to defend ourselves. Oh, Obama says they won't do that.......BS! That is exactly what he is up to.

Obamacare is the biggest bunch of crap I have ever heard of. People do not understand what this means. You Democrats are going to wonder what hit you in the face one of these days, soon.

We all need to start complaining to our senators and representatives.......I mean really letting them know how we feel. Of course, those of you that are sitting there snickering won't do anything but those of you that have the same concerns that I do.......PLEASE let your voices be heard.

<quoted text>"West Plains," YOU ARE BUSTED AGAIN!It is interesting that NONE of the following countries are on your PRESUMABLY UNBIASED LIST: Canada, Japan, Germany, Italy, France, England, Ireland, Scotland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Belgium, and Holland, amongst others.All of those countries more or less either have gun bans, gun registration, or outright bans on the carrying of firearms.Let us consider our neighbor to the north: Canada. For most all purposes, Canadians are NOT allowed to carry. Many firearms are restricted. For example, handguns MUST BE REGISTERED. The homicide rate in Canada is 1.6, as compared to the US rate of 4.2. That's only ONE-THIRD the rate of homicides in the US. Canada must be doing something right.A consideration of Canada alone suggests that the US should have additional restrictions on the possession of firearms.Nice propaganda try, "West Plains," but no sale.

And, if that’s why Washington is stockpiling massive amounts of ammunition (hollow points, by the way), why is Homeland Security doing the buying instead of the Defense Department?

I have some theories.

Many of you will remember a story I broke a long time ago – about presidential candidate Barack Obama’s little-noticed announcement that, if elected in 2008, he wanted to create a “civilian national security force” as big, as strong and as well-funded as the Defense Department.

Here’s what he actually said at a campaign stop in Colorado July 2, 2008:“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

Could what we see happening now in the Department of Homeland Security be the beginning of Obama’s dream and our constitutional nightmare?

We’ve learned more about Obama’s vision since then. Maybe it’s time for a review:

He made the campaign promise to build this $439 billion domestic army, but all references to the initiative were inexplicably deleted from the copy of his speech posted on his website while others mysteriously disappeared from transcripts of the speech distributed by the campaign. That was strange – and ominous. At the time, I had never heard anyone use the phrase “civilian national security force” before. But I did a little homework and found out where it originated. It was first proposed by then Bush administration Defense Secretary Robert Gates. On that basis alone, I accurately predicted that, if elected, Obama would name Gates as his own defense secretary. Needless to say, when that appointment came to pass, no media outlet bothered to interview me about my foresight. Still during the campaign of 2008, I suggested that what Obama had in mind might be something very sinister indeed – perhaps “some kind of domestic Big Brother program.”

We never heard another mention of Obama’s “civilian national security force” again. Not in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 or 2012.

But that brings us up to 2013 and the highly unusual stockpiling of firearms and ammo by Homeland Security – firearms and ammo that Obama would like to deny to ordinary citizens who are not members of his domestic army.

Well, I hate to say it, but I may have predicted this, too.

In a Halloween column last fall, I stated that, if re-elected, Obama would “declare a full-scale war on his domestic opposition.”

I wasn’t joking. I was deadly serious – so serious, in fact, that I did something I pledged I would never do: Vote for Mitt Romney. It was a matter of self-defense and self-preservation. I said then that a second term of Obama might mean we would never see another free and fair election in America.(I’m not even sure we saw one in 2012.) I suggested due process would go the way of the horse and buggy. I said I expected Obama would move to shut down or destroy all independent media. I even speculated that his biggest critics would eventually be rounded up in the name of national security.

Think about it.

Why does the civilian Department of Homeland Security need billions of rounds of ammunition?

This is the agency that is responsible for policing the border. But it doesn’t.

This is the agency that is responsible for catching terrorists. But it doesn’t.

So why does Homeland Security need so many weapons and enough hollow-point rounds to plug every American six times?

Maybe this is the “civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the Defense Department.

These words –“civilian national security force”– have haunted me ever since I first read them.

I am appauled they are going to allow Gays in the Boy Scouts. It is just plain wrong. What has happened to our morals? Obama thinks it's just OK to do that. I wonder if he would like his daughters around a Lesbian! How can such a smart man be so dumb?I am also appauled about the gun control issue, too. The bad people are going to have guns I don't care what they do about gun control. I don't know what any person needs with an assault rifle but I don't think they should take away our right to defend ourselves. Oh, Obama says they won't do that.......BS! That is exactly what he is up to.Obamacare is the biggest bunch of crap I have ever heard of. People do not understand what this means. You Democrats are going to wonder what hit you in the face one of these days, soon.We all need to start complaining to our senators and representatives.......I mean really letting them know how we feel. Of course, those of you that are sitting there snickering won't do anything but those of you that have the same concerns that I do.......PLEASE let your voices be heard.CHEERS!

1. There's no need to worry about gays in the BSA, you need to get rid of the pedophiles....they're the dangerous ones.

<quoted text>You need to get a life. Sad how you spend so much time on a forum that is 3 years past date. Is it your Autism, delusions, drug problem, or something else that makes you to scared to post on forums that are relevant to today?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.