I'm a Libertarian living in Humboldt County, CA. I've lived here in Eureka since 1973 and joined the Libertarian Party in 1992. This blog will mostly focus on local political issues, but I may stray into state and national issues as well, when I can't help myself. Please post your comments by clicking on the "comments" link at the bottom of each post. Although I do moderate comments, you need not be a registered user to post them.

Saturday, April 02, 2005

Street Conversions

I read somewhere recently that there was some talk of converting H and I Streets, in Eureka, which have been one way streets for time immemorial, into two way streets. Not sure where I heard it but it might have been something in the Eureka Reporter that Nancy Flemming said. Are they talking about doing that in any other towns around here?So, just by chance, I receive a commentary on such plans via the National Center for Policy Analysis' e- newsletter and tried to forward it to a couple folks on the Eureka City Council but the e-mail is bounced three times with the message that their spam filter blocked it. Oh well, maybe I'll just FAX it to them. Below is the brief I received from NCPA. To summarize, while it may reduce traffic converting to two way, traffic accidents increase. I think I'd prefer fewer accidents over slower or less traffic. Besides, if something already works, why try and fix it?From the NCPA:Urban planners in Denver, as well as other major cities, are implementing a controversial measure designed to slow traffic and reduce accidents: converting one-way streets into two-way streets. The plan runs counter to the consensus of traffic engineers and experience, says transportation engineer Michael Cunneen and economist Randal O'Toole. In fact, two-way streets increase traffic congestion, increase accidents and make pedestrians less safe.

In Denver, two one-way streets have already been converted: Grant and Logan, which used to carry about 7,000 cars per day now carry only 600 and 11,600 cars per day, angering nearby residents.

In Lubbock several one-way streets were converted to two-way in 1996; as a result, traffic on those streets dropped by 12 percent, but accidents increased by 25 percent.

In 1993, Indianapolis converted a major one-way thoroughfare into a two-way street; accidents increased by 33 percent.

Moreover, pedestrians have to worry about crossing lanes of traffic coming in opposite directions, adding to their risk as well. On the other hand, converting two-way streets to one-way streets reduces congestion and decreases accidents: One study indicates that traffic speeds increase on one-way streets by 37 percent, but with a 38-percent decrease in accidents. In several Oregon cities, converting two-way streets to one-way streets led to 23 percent more traffic but 10 percent fewer accidents, meaning the accident rate per million vehicle miles declined by 27 percent. Despite overwhelming evidence against converting one-way streets, city officials in Austin, Tampa, Seattle and other cities are considering such plans, which cost millions of dollars to implement. Source: Michael Cunneen and Randal O'Toole, "No Two Ways About It: One-Way Streets Are Better Than Two-Way," Center for the American Dream, Issue paper2-2005, February 2005. For text: http://i2i.org/articles/2-2005.pdf For more on State and Local Regulations: http://www.ncpa.org/iss/sta/

1 Comments:

Received an e-mail from City Council Dude, Chris Kerrigan, and he said he had heard no discussion of converting H and I Streets in the current city council although it has been discussed in the past. Maybe nothing to worry about then?