Thursday, February 16, 2017

As a United States Citizen or a "person", did you know that you do not LEGALLY own anything? That is right! You do not legally own your body, name, land, home, cars, clothes, kids and money. This is why government agents can legally take your kids and property or throw you in jail for violating their so-called "laws".

If you were to truly own property, you would have the exclusive right to regulate it and therefore the government would not be able to legally confiscate it, unless you use it to harm someone. Is it hard for you to believe that you do not legally own anything? Read further and I will show you the evidence to prove that you do not legally own any property.

Evidence That You Do Not Own Any Property

According to Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session, all property of United States Citizens is owned by the State. Below is an excerpt of a paragraph from Senate Document 43 that openly admits this fact.

The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called "ownership" is only by virtue of Government, i.e. law, amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law, and subordinate to the necessities of the State.

As a United States Citizen, you own no property because you are considered a legal person, which is an artificial or dead person. A dead or artificial person can not own property because it is not living. The legal system tricks you to agree to be a legal person by deceiving you to participate in the legal name fraud. As a United States Citizen, you are also an enemy and a slave of the State. As described in the article below:

After thorough research in North Carolina by a team of 5 people, we came up with documentation between the United States, and not only North Carolina, but other States. It was to slowly induce people into obtaining licenses as now the people, being declared public enemies, had to have licenses. The documentation showed how all people that were not required to have a license to drive were now required to have a license merely to travel as a right because they were the enemies. My mother and father, both deceased, told me that they never had to get a license until 1936. This documentation also showed how speed laws were set; how federal labor laws and unemployment compensation was legislated into the States; and the most important of all the social security; touted as insurance, it was in actuality a means of licensing the "enemy" to track their commerce under the Trading Acts with the newly revised 1917 Trading with the enemy act.

This enemy surveillance is very evident today by the use of what should be termed the Social Slave number but is called Social Security. It was instituted by the President, NOT Congress as most people believe. Oh sure, Congress passed legislation so it appears they instituted it, but under the war powers only the President institutes anything of importance and Congress under the constitutional war powers takes a second seat. They, in effect, become the puppets of the Executive branch. While under the war powers, all branches that should come under the Legislative branch and even the judiciary are controlled by the executive department through the Commander-in-Chief.

Since 1933, and before then, we have always been under Executive Emergency Orders despite in 1974 all was repealed EXCEPT for section 5(b) of the Trading With the Enemy Act of 1917. You can find it alive and well in Title 12 USC 95 (a)&(b). You can also find the other emergency war powers acts still existing from 1862 which have NEVER been repealed. They have their genesis from 12 Stat 319, and are 50 USC 212, 213, and 215 and 28 USC 2461 to 2465 as statutes passed as a direct and immediate result of declared emergencies. You will see how this is done as you read through this memorandum of mine.

This is totally under military powers of the Commander in Chief, The President. This military Rule allows the civil government to operate as it has, only it all comes under administrative directives of the Commander In Chief. This explains the reason all courts fly the Executives Commander In Chief gold fringe flag and Federal courts have stationary using the United States Executive Seal. Now that you know that, you have been under executive Rule before and since 1933. I will now go back to the first President to institute the Emergency War Powers Act to make the people the enemy of the State. Roosevelt just made you the enemy of the banking cartel to protect them. That is why the private banking system Board can do what they want with impunity. They even wrote in the law that the signature card you sign when opening a bank account, unbeknownst to you, states in the 35 to 38 page contract they are to give to you, but don’t, that you assume the debt of the United States. This is unconscionable under the commercial law that you were never informed. This is your promise, assumpsit in legal terms, which obligates and binds you to pay the debt of the United States by becoming the surety. Remember all Banks controlled by the Federal Reserve System are agents of the United States Treasury.

How many people would enter a contract like that, knowing they are responsible for the national debt? Since the Federal Reserve is a private corporation and was made the fiscal agent of the Treasury to collect and disburse money, or chose in action called federal reserve notes, is the reason the 1040 IRS Form is a return; a return of a use portion of the debt that is circulated around by the enemy, AKA the people of America. This is a very insidious scheme that people have no idea exists. In fact I have found and written on the fact that in Title 31 it states that banks can collect taxes on the 1040 form that is presented to them. I have posted this research on www.atgpress.com/.

The first President to use the Emergency powers was Washington. He used it to institute the first private bank of the United States, which, was against all principles of the constitution, EXCEPT, when instituted under constitutional war power it became constitutional. Then in order to control the banks in each of the separate states, which Congress could not do under the Constitution in time of peace, he made districts out of each of the states. So now you had states and district states and that is how the district courts of each state were formed so the United States could now have control where it dared not tread before. Once emergency had been declared then all done under this act is constitutional. Contrary to what people believe this act DID NOT set the Constitution aside. It only operated in a different way under emergency powers.

Now with all this in mind that the Commander in Chief can operate within the Constitution when military rule under the Emergency Powers Act is invoked; we move to Lincolns time and his Solicitor General of the War Department who wrote the book to show how common people have always been considered as nothing but mere chattel property of a group of aristocracy that was called Congress. From the beginning, this is the foundation that has caused people to slowly lose what rights they THOUGHT they had, but the plan was to get where we are today without a major rebellion by the people.
This almost took place in 1861 with the Southern States wanting to secede from the Union, and caused Lincoln to invoke the Emergency Powers Act in Order that he could control the Government without Congress. He did this under the guiding of the works of Whiting. Once he invoked it Congress could do nothing to stop it and the Courts, under this Act cannot stop it at all as you will see why in End Note 17. [To read the full article, visit this page.]

Did You Know Most of the Founding Fathers of the USA Were Crown Agents?

What most Americans do not know is that most of the so-called Founding Fathers of the USA were agents of the Crown, and therefore are FOREIGN agents to the American people. Because of this, one of their goals was to trick the American people to think that they worked for the American people. In reality, most of the Founding Fathers were "enemies" to the American people. Another thing that most Americans do not know is that the U.S. government is a foreign corporation owned and controlled by the Crown.

Do you understand now why you do not legally own any property? This fraud is worldwide which is why anyone who is a citizen of a "country" does not own any property. Another reason why you do not legally own any property is because the government sees you as a "person" that is "dead at sea." As described in my book titledWord Magic: The Powers & Occult Definitions of Words:

The process that allows the government to legally claim you as a corporate entity involves the creation of a fictional character, and then tricking you to consent to be that fictional character, which is the artificial person or legal name. This legal name was created shortly after you were born and was recorded on a bond. This bond that represents the date of your birth is known as your birth certificate. …

One of the most common words they like to use to trick you in court is the word person. The word person is a general word for the reason that it can mean a legal person, a natural person, a corporation, a name, or any fictitious entity. Most of the time when the judge asks you for your name, he is asking for your legal name, which is a legal person. A legal person can also be a corporation.

A corporation is a "corp-o-ration" or "corpse-o-ration". The plural form of the word corporation can be written as corps. Phonetically, the word corps sounds similar to the word corpse, which is defined as "a dead body, usually of a human being". The legal system sees you as a corpse to be used as a ration to feed the Matrix of the Dark Forces. Hence, the word corporation/corp-o-ration/corpse-o-ration. Do you remember what I said in Chapter 2 about why the government sees you as a legally dead person, because you are considered lost at sea or dead at sea? …

According to Black’s Law Dictionary 6th edition, a corporation is "an artificial person or legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of a state". An artificial person is considered a dead entity, because it does not exist in the real world.

This is why you do not legally own any property. As a legally dead person, corporation or slave, you can not legally own any property. So, the next time you decide to legally change your name or buy a big house, a nice car, or even a toothbrush, remember that you do not legally own it.

The good news is that there is a way to own property, but you need to first correct your status by letting the government know that you are a living spiritual man or woman and not a legal person (legal fiction). In the United States, if you do not correct your status, the U.S. government presumes that you are a legal person, which is an artificial or dead person that has no natural rights (e.g., the right to own property).

Below are two videos that do an excellent job of explaining why you do not legally own any property. I highly encourage that you watch the videos because they will help you to innerstand why the political, legal and banking system are so corrupt.

Saturday, February 11, 2017

A shocking statement was made by a United Nations official Christiana Figueres at a news conference in Brussels. Figueres admitted that the Global Warming conspiracy set by the U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, of which she is the executive secretary, has a goal not of environmental activists to save the world from ecological calamity, but to destroy capitalism.

She said very casually:

"This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution."

She even restated that goal ensuring it was not a mistake:

"This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history."

I was invited to a major political dinner in Washington with the former Chairman of Temple University since I advised the University with respect to its portfolio. We were seated at one of those round tables with ten people. Because we were invited from a university, they placed us with the heads of the various environmental groups. They assumed they were in friendly company and began speaking freely. Dick Fox, my friend and Chairman of Temple, began to lead them on to get the truth behind their movement. Low and behold, they too admitted it was not about the environment, but to reduce population growth. Dick then asked them, "Whose grandchild are we trying to prevent from being born? Your’s or mine?"

All of these movements seem to have a hidden agenda that the press helps to misrepresent all the time. One must wonder, at what point will the press realize they are destroying their own future?

3 February 2015 - The Top UN Climate Change Official is optimistic that a new international treaty will be adopted at Paris Climate Change conference at the end of the year. However the official, Christiana Figueres, the Executive Secretary of UNFCCC, warns that the fight against climate change is a process and that the necessary transformation of the world economy will not be decided at one conference or in one agreement.

"This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model, for the first time in human history", Ms Figueres stated at a press conference in Brussels.

"This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the industrial revolution. That will not happen overnight and it will not happen at a single conference on climate change, be it COP 15, 21, 40 - you choose the number. It just does not occur like that. It is a process, because of the depth of the transformation."

Lima Draft

The so called 'Lima draft', which was adopted in December 2014 at the UN Climate Conference in Lima (Peru) will be subject of further negotiations by members states, starting in Geneva next week. Two rounds of negotiations are expected before the Climate Change Conference convenes in Paris in December.

The current draft is 39 pages including options, sub-options and brackets. The negotiators in Geneva have until 13 February to "manage and streamline" the draft. According to Ms Figueres, there are a lot of differences now in comparison to the run up to the Copenhagen Summit on Climate Change in 2009, during which a successor treaty to the Kyoto protocol on limiting CO2 emissions was last attempted. She pointed out that with one year to go there already is a draft, whereas there was none until the start of the Copenhagen Summit.

Four goals

Figueres, however, pointed out that the legal treaty is only one of four important parts of the process. In addition to the treaty, there are the current Climate Change actions from now and until 2020, the financing packages and the so-called Intended National Determined Contributions (INDCs). These are the actions that countries intend to take under a global agreement from 2020 and have to be publicly outlined before the start of the conference. It is expected that all major economies will deliver their plans in time: the US, China, and the European Union have already shown their cards.

Maximum level of ambition

Ms Figueres went on to say that the sum total of the national contributions are not expected to be enough to limit the increase of world temperature to 2*C.

"That is not a discovery, that is not a breaking news item. We need to get to the maximum level of ambition of collective INDCs because what we are going to have to do all of the time is to close the gap between what science tells us where we have to be and where we actually are….But the point is will we be at the end destination? I would argue, yes."

Christiana Figueres was appointed as the new Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon in 2010, and was reappointed for a second three year term in July 2013.

Wednesday, February 8, 2017

You are "legally" a slave, just as your parents, your grandparents and great grandparents were slaves. You may be lucky enough to live in a pleasant plantation with other slaves, managed by overseer slaves such as police, judges, doctors and politicians where few examples of slave cruelty occur. Or you may be witnessing changes in the community plantation, which is part of a state slave plantation and national slave plantation where there is more crime, more misery and death. The fact that you are a slave is unquestionable. The only unknown is whether you will permit your children and their children to also grow up as slaves.

You are a slave because since 1933, upon a new child being borne, the Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate willingly and knowingly convey the beneficial entitlements of the child as Beneficiary into the 1st Cestui Que (Vie) Trust in the form of a Registry Number by registering the Name, thereby also creating the Corporate Person and denying the child any rights as an owner of Real Property.

You are a slave because since 1933, when a child is borne, the Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate knowingly and willingly claim the baby as chattel to the Estate. The slave baby contract is then created by honouring the ancient tradition of either having the ink impression of the feet of the baby onto the live birth record, or a drop of its blood as well as tricking the parents to signing the baby away through the deceitful legal meanings on the live birth record. This live birth record as a promissory note is converted into a slave bond sold to the private reserve bank of the estate and then conveyed into a 2nd and separate Cestui Que (Vie) Trust per child owned by the bank. Upon the promissory note reaching maturity and the bank being unable to "seize" the slave child, a maritime lien is lawfully issued to "salvage" the lost property and itself monetized as currency issued in series against the Cestui Que (Vie) Trust.

You are a slave because since 1540 and the creation of the 1st Cestui Que Act, deriving its power from the Papal Bull of Roman Cult leader Pope Paul III of the same year, whenever a child is baptized and a Baptismal Certificate is issued by the state at birth or church, the parents have knowingly or unknowingly gifted, granted and conveyed the soul of the baby to a "3rd" Cestui Que Vie Trust owner by Roman Cult, who has held this valuable property in its vaults ever since, managed by the Temple Bar since 1540 and subsequent Bar Associations from the 19th Century representing the reconstituted "Galla" responsible as Grim Reapers for reaping the souls, or salvage also known as "salvation of souls".

Therefore under the UCC Slave Laws which most slave plantations of the world operate you can never own a house, even though they trick into believing you do; you never really own a car, or boat or any other object, only have the benefit of use. Indeed, you do not even own your own body, which is claimed to have been lawfully gifted by your parents at your birth in the traditions of old slave contracts in which the slave baby had its feet or hands dipped in ink, or a drop of blood spilt on the commercial transaction document we know as the live birth record, against which a CUSIP number is issued and sold the the central bank. Yes, the banks claim your flesh, the banks are indeed the modern slave owners, hiding these indisputable facts upon which their money system is built from the people.

You may not realize you are a slave under the slave laws of Uniform Commercial Codes (UCC), but may still erroneously believe you are slave with "more rights" as used to be afforded under "Common Law" until it was largely abolished back in 1933 without properly telling you. The word "common" comes from 14th Century Latin communis meaning "to entrust, commit to a burden, public duty, service or obligation". The word was created from the combination of two ancient pre-Vatican Latin words com/comitto = "to entrust, commit" and munis = "burden, public duty, service or obligation". In other words, the real meaning of common as first formed because of the creation of the Roman Trust over the planet is the concept of "voluntary servitude" or simply "voluntary enslavement".

Common Law is nothing more than the laws of "voluntary servitude" and the laws of "voluntary slavery" to the Roman Cult and the Venetian Slavemasters. It is the job of the overseer slaves to convince you that you are not slaves, the common law still exists and has not been largely abolished and replaced with commercial law, to confuse you, to give you false hope. In return, they are rewarded as loyal slaves with bigger homes to use and more privileges than other slaves.

The reason why the overseer slaves such as judges, politicians, bankers, actors and media personalities are forced to lie and deny we are all slaves is because the slave system of voluntary servitude or "common law" was not the first global slave system, but merely its evolution. Before the emergence of Common Law, we were all subject to being considered mere animals or things under Canon Law of the Roman Cult, also known as the Law of the See, or Admiralty Law.

Under Admiralty Law, you are either a slave of the ship of state, or merely cargo for lawful salvage. Thus in 1302 through Unam Sanctam, the Roman Cult unlawfully claimed through trust the ownership of all the planet and all living "things" as either slaves, or less than slaves with things administered through the Court of Rota. This court, claimed as the Supreme Court of all Courts on the planet was initially abolished in the 16th Century only to be returned in 1908 under Pope Pius X as a purely spiritual ecclesiastical court of 12 "apostolic prothonotary" spirits, implying the twelve apostles. Since then, this new purely spiritual court has remained in constant "session", with the local courts using these powers to administer Divine Immortal Spirits expressed in Trust into Flesh Vessels as mere dead things.

Yet this is not the only form of slave law still in force today. Instead, the oldest, the most evil and based on false history are the slave laws of the Menasheh, also known as the Rabbi through the unholy document of hate first formed in 333 known as the Talmud of the Menasheh- the false Israelites. Through the Talmud of the false Israelites, the whole planet is enslaved with the servants of the "chosen people" known as Caananites or K-nights (Knights) also known as the Scythians and then the rest as the goy/gyu and goyim – namely meaning the cattle, the dead lifeless corpses.

Ultimately, you are a slave because you remain profoundly influenced by your education and community at large and because many choose to continue to think and act like a slave, waiting for someone to help them, tell them what to do and be happy accepting bread crumbs of benefits when the system has reaped millions of dollars - yes millions of dollars - of your energy.

Baptisms
Ask yourself whether you’re organising a Baptism for your child because you were Baptised, you think it’s the right thing to do, or your in-laws are putting pressure on you.

To understand the real reasons you are encouraged to baptise your child, you first need to understand the background of Trusts. If you like what you read, go ahead; if you have second thoughts have a simple family ceremony with no formal baptismal certificate issued. The Government won’t like it but will God care? Not a bit!

History of Trusts:

The 1st Trust of the World

Unam Sanctam is one of the most frightening documents of history and the one most quoted as the primary document of the popes claiming their global power. It is an express trust deed. The last line reads: "Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff." It is not only the first trust deed in history but also the largest trust ever conceived, as it claims the whole planet and everything on it, conveyed in trust.

Triple Crown of Ba’al, aka the Papal Tiara and Triregnum

In 1302 Pope Boniface issued his infamous Papal Bull Unam Sanctam – the first Express Trust. He claimed control over the whole planet which made him "King of the world". In celebration, he commissioned a gold-plated headdress in the shape of a pinecone, with an elaborate crown at its base.

The pinecone is an ancient symbol of fertility and one traditionally associated with Ba’al as well as the Cult of Cybele. It also represents the pineal gland in the centre of our brains – crystalline in nature – which allows us access to Source, hence, the 13-foot tall pinecone in Vatican Square. Think about why the Pontiffs would idolize a pinecone.

The 1st Crown of Crown Land

Pope Boniface VIII was the first leader in history to create the concept of a Trust, but the first Testamentary Trust, through a deed and will creating a Deceased Estate, was created by Pope Nicholas V in 1455, through the Papal Bull Romanus Pontifex. This is only one of three (3) papal bulls to include the line with the incipit "For a perpetual remembrance." This Bull had the effect of conveying the right of use of the land as Real Property, from the Express Trust Unam Sanctam, to the control of the Pontiff and his successors in perpetuity. Hence, all land is claimed as "crown land". This 1st Crown is represented by the 1st Cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is born. It deprives us of all beneficial entitlements and rights on the land.

The 2nd Crown of the Commonwealth

The second Crown was created in 1481 with the papal bull Aeterni Regis, meaning "Eternal Crown", by Sixtus IV, being only the 2nd of three papal bulls as deeds of testamentary trusts. This Papal Bull created the "Crown of Aragon", later known as the Crown of Spain, and is the highest sovereign and highest steward of all Roman Slaves subject to the rule of the Roman Pontiff. Spain lost the crown in 1604 when it was granted to King James I of England by Pope Paul V after the successful passage of the "Union of Crowns", or Commonwealth, in 1605 after the false flag operation of the Gunpowder Plot. The Crown was finally lost by England in 1975, when it was returned to Spain and King Carlos I, where it remains to this day. This 2nd Crown is represented by the 2nd cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is born and, by the sale of the birth certificate as a Bond to the private central bank of the nation, depriving us of ownership of our flesh and condemning us to perpetual servitude, as a Roman person, or slave.

The 3rd Crown of the Ecclesiastical See

The third Crown was created in 1537 by Paul III, through the papal bull Convocation, also meant to open the Council of Trent. It is the third and final testamentary deed and will of a testamentary trust, set up for the claiming of all "lost souls", lost to the See. The Venetians assisted in the creation of the 1st Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540, to use this papal bull as the basis of Ecclesiastical authority of Henry VIII. This Crown was secretly granted to England in the collection and "reaping" of lost souls.

The Crown was lost in 1816, due to the deliberate bankruptcy of England, and granted to the Temple Bar which became known as the Crown Bar, or simply the Crown. The Bar Associations have since been responsible for administering the "reaping" of the souls of the lost and damned, including the registration and collection of Baptismal certificates representing the souls collected by the Vatican and stored in its vaults.

This 3rd Crown is represented by the 3rd Cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is baptized. It is the parents’ grant of the Baptismal certificate – title to the soul – to the church or Registrar. Thus, without legal title over one’s own soul, we will be denied legal standing and will be treated as things – cargo without souls – upon which the BAR is now legally able to enforce Maritime law.

The Cestui Que Vie Trust:

A Cestui Que Vie Trust is a fictional concept. It is a Temporary Testamentary Trust, first created during the reign of Henry VIII of England through the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540 and updated by Charles II, through the CQV Act of 1666, wherein an Estate may be effected for the Benefit of a Person presumed lost or abandoned at "sea" and therefore assumed "dead" after seven (7) years. Additional presumptions, by which such a Trust may be formed, were added in later statutes to include bankrupts, minors, incompetents, mortgages, and private companies. The original purpose of a CQV Trust was to form a temporary Estate for the benefit of another because some event, state of affairs, or condition prevented them from claiming their status as living, competent, and present, before a competent authority. Therefore, any claims, history, statutes, or arguments that deviate in terms of the origin and function of a CQV Trust, as pronounced by these canons, is false and automatically null and void.

A Beneficiary under Estate may be either a Beneficiary or a CQV Trust. When a Beneficiary loses direct benefit of any Property of the higher Estate placed in a CQV Trust on his behalf, he do not "own" the CQV Trust; he is only the beneficiary of what the Trustees of the CQV Trust choose to provide. As all CQV Trusts are created on presumption, based upon original purpose and function, such a Trust cannot be created if these presumptions can be proven not to exist.

Since 1933, when a child is borne in a State (Estate) under inferior Roman law, three (3) Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts are created upon certain presumptions specifically designed to deny, forever, the child any rights of Real Property, any Rights to be free, and any Rights to be known as man or woman, rather than a creature or animal, by claiming and possessing their Soul or Spirit.

The Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate willingly and knowingly:

1. Convey the beneficial entitlements of the child, as Beneficiary, into the 1st Cestui Que (Vie) Trust in the form of a Registry Number by registering the Name, thereby also creating the Corporate Person and denying the child any rights to Real Property; and,

2. Claim the baby as chattel to the Estate. The slave baby contract is then created by honoring the ancient tradition of either having the ink impression of the baby’s feet onto the live birth record, or a drop of its blood, as well as tricking the parents to signing the baby away through the deceitful legal meanings on the live birth record which is a promissory note, converted into a slave bond, sold to the private reserve bank of the estate, and then conveyed into a 2nd and separate CQV Trust, per child, owned by the bank. When the promissory note reaches maturity and the bank is unable to "seize" the slave child, a maritime lien is lawfully issued to "salvage" the lost property and is monetized as currency issued in series against the CQV Trust.

3. Claim the child’s soul via the Baptismal Certificate. Since 1540 and the creation of the 1st CQV Act, deriving its power from the Papal Bull of Roman Cult leader Pope Paul III, 1540, when a child is baptized and a Baptismal Certificate is issued, the parents have gifted, granted, and conveyed the soul of the baby to a "3rd" CQV Trust owned by Roman Cult, which has held this valuable property in its vaults ever since. Since 1815, this 3rd Crown of the Roman Cult and 3rd CQV Trust representing Ecclesiastical Property has been managed by the BAR as the reconstituted "Galla" responsible, as Grim Reapers, for reaping the souls.

Each Cestui Que Vie Trust, created since 1933, represents one of the 3 Crowns representing the three claims of property of the Roman Cult: Real Property (on Earth), Personal Property (body), and Ecclesiastical Property (soul). Each corresponds exactly to the three forms of law available to the Galla of the BAR Courts: corporate commercial law (judge is the ‘landlord’), maritime and canon law (judge is the banker), and Talmudic law (judge is the priest).

What is the real power of a court ‘judge’?

Given what has been revealed about the foundations of Roman Law, what is the real hidden power of a judge when we face court? Is it their superior knowledge of process and procedure or of magic? Or is it something simpler and far more obvious? It is unfortunate that much of the excitement about Estates and Executors has deliberately not revealed that an Estate, by definition, has to belong to a Trust – to be specific, a Testamentary Trust or CQV Trust. When we receive legal paper or have to appear in court, it is these same CQV Trusts which have our rights converted into the property contained within them. Instead of being the Trustee, or the Executor, or Administrator, we are merely the Beneficiary of each CQV Trust, granted only beneficial and equitable use of certain property, never legal title. So if the Roman Legal System assumes we are merely the beneficiary of these CQV Trusts, when we go to court, who represents the Trustee and Office of Executor? We all know that all cases are based upon the judge’s discretion which often defies procedures, statutes, and maxims of law. Well, they are doing what any Trustee or Executor, administering a trust in the presence of the beneficiary, can do under Roman Law and all the statutes, maxims, and procedures are really for show because under the principles of Trust Law, as first formed by the Roman Cult, a Trustee has a wide latitude, including the ability to correct any procedural mistakes, by obtaining the implied or tacit consent of the beneficiary, to obviate any mistakes. The judge is the real and legal Name. The judge is the trust, itself. We are the mirror image to them – the ghost – the dead.

It is high sorcery, trickery, and subterfuge that has remained "legal" for far too long.

Origin of Settlement (Birth) Certificates:

Under King Henry VIII of England and his Venetian/Magyar advisers, the first poor laws were promulgated around 1535 coinciding with the first official mandate requiring uniform record keeping by all Church of England parishes of births, deaths and marriages. The poor were considered the responsibility of the "Church" including ensuring they had ample work and did not starve to death as they were considered by default the property of the church.

Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, a set of measures which were introduced which had the effect of accelerating the disenfranchisement of land peasants into landless paupers. Under the Erection of Cottages Act 1588, peasants required local parish permission to erect dwellings whereas before the erection of a dwelling by a land peasant on their lord's land was considered a "right". As a result, the ranks of the landless poor, or "paupers" swelled.

Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, the laws concerning the administration and care of the "poor" were refined through the Poor Law (1601) which introduced a basic set of "rights" for the poor as well as the introduction of two "Overseers of the Poor" (Guardian) in each Parish, elected at Easter and funded through the first levy (tax) through local rates (now called "council taxes") on property owning rate payers.

Under Charles II of England, the concept of "Settlements" as plantations of working poor controlled by the Church of England was further refined through the Settlement Act (1662) and Poor Relief Act (1662) including for the first time the issuance of "Settlement Certificates" equivalent to a "birth certificate, passport and social security" rolled into one document. A child's birthplace was its place of settlement, unless its mother had a settlement certificate from some other parish stating that the unborn child was included on the certificate. However from the age of 7 upwards the child could have been apprenticed and gained a settlement for itself through called indentured service, or "voluntary slavery". Also, the child could have obtained a settlement for itself by service by the time it was 16.

Under the "reforms" of the Settlement Act (1662) and Poor Relief Act (1662), no one was allowed to move from town to town without the appropriate "Settlement Certificate". If a person entered a parish in which he or she did not have official settlement, and seemed likely to become chargeable to the new parish, then an examination would be made by the justices (or parish overseers). From this examination on oath, the justices would determine if that person had the means to sustain himself. The results of the examination were documented in an Examination Paper. As a result of the examination the intruder would then either be allowed to stay, or would be removed by means of what was known as a Removal Order, the origin of the modern equivalent of an "Eviction and Removal Notice" when a sheriff removes people from their home.

According to the various settlement acts from the 17th Century onwards until the introduction of Birth Certificates, the issue of a Settlement Certificate was considered a privilege, not a right. If a peasant wanted to move, the home parish could choose to issue a Settlement Certificate which then effectively became an indemnity insurance to the new parish if the pauper was unable to earn a living. A settlement certificate was only valid if it bore the seals of the overseers of both parishes and that of the local Justices and was not transferable. This is the same model of modern passports for citizens listed as "P" (Paupers or Peons) used today.

Due to the increase in the number of "poor", in 1723 a new law was passed called the Workhouse Test Act (1723) in which those who wished to claim benefits and relief as poor now had to enter a "workhouse" being essentially a prison for men, women and children to perform some set work. To ensure that all poor were accounted and could be identified, new laws were also introduced to force the Paupers to wear a ‘P’ on their right shoulders as a mark of their status. This is both the origin of the "P" still placed as a mark on modern passports and other "official" documents and the "P" worn by prisoners from the 20th Century.

Beginning in 1773 with the Inclosure Act 1773, followed by the Inclosure Consolidation Act 1801, English Parliament effectively "privatised" massive amounts of common land for the benefit of a few, causing huge numbers of land peasants to become "landless paupers" and therefore in need of parish assistance. The Inclosure Acts are the foundation of Land Title as it is known today.

Because of the deliberate "legal" theft of land under parliamentary Inclosure laws of the late 18th and early 19th Century, the number of paupers dramatically increased. This led to the most awful and cruel laws being introduced to deliver to an elite few, the slave labour force needed for the industrial revolution through the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) which effectively stated that the poor could not receive any benefit unless they were constantly "employed" in a workhouse prison. Thus, despite international treaties against slavery, the very worst slavery being "wage slavery" or "lawful slavery" was born whereby men, women and children lived in terrible conditions and were worked "to death".

Beginning in 1834, a number of historic changes were introduced to the record keeping of births, deaths and marriages, the issuance of documents and the management of the "poor":

(i) In 1834, British Parliament introduced the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) which reorganized Church of England parishes into unions which would then be responsible for the poor in their area and administered by a Board of Poor Law Guardians, also known as the Board of Guardians. The clerks of Magistrates Courts still hold the power of a Clerk of the Board of Guardians; and

(ii) In 1835, the Municipal Corporations Act (1835) was introduced which effectively standardized the corporate model for towns and boroughs including making the municipality with elected officials responsible for data collection and service administration; and

(iii) In 1836, the Births and Deaths Registration Act (1836) was introduced which for the first time created the General Register Office and the requirement for uniform records of births, deaths and marriages across the Empire by Municipal Councils and Unions of Parishes. Thus on 1 July 1837, the Birth Certificate was formed as the successor of the Settlement Certificate for all "paupers" disenfranchised of their land birthright to be considered lawful ("voluntary") slaves with benefits provided by the local parish/region underwritten by the Society of Lloyds as it is still today.

Beginning from 1871, further historic changes in the administration of "vital statistics" such as birth certificates and death certificates with the introduction of health districts or "sanitary districts". The Local Government Act of 1871, Public Health Act 1872 and Public Health Act 1875 created a system of "districts" called Sanitary Districts governed by a Sanitary Authority responsible for various public health matters including mental health legally known as "sanity". Two types of Sanitary Districts were created being Urban and Rural. While the sanitary districts were "abolished" in 1894 with the Local Government Act of 1894, the administration of the "poor" is still maintained in part under the concept of district health boards of Guardians including magistrates and other "Justices of the Peace".

Since 1990 under the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (WHO) by the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the system of issuing birth certificates as proof of a man or woman being a permanent member of the underclass has become an international system.

Birth Certificate as proof one is born on the land:

One fundamental flaw that remains within the Settlement (Birth) Certificate System for the Roman Cult and its agents remains the fact that a Settlement Certificate is proof that a man or woman must have been born on the land for the certificate to have effect, regardless of convoluted subsequent presumptions of what the certificate actually represents. If a man or woman was not born on the land somewhere a certificate could not be issued. Therefore any rejection, or return of a Birth Certificate serves as perfected evidence that a man or woman was born on the land and support to any Affidavit of Truth concerning their immutable rights from the Divine Creator.

This built in "flaw" is offset through the treatment of men and women as land themselves, through the deliberate corruption of the definition of land to include all that has been born naturally or self-improved on the land. In other words, the sharp edge reason the system ultimately denies each citizen their share of the commonwealth is because they are considered "chattel" and mere creatures less than slaves.

Birth Certificates are not "extremely valuable" to the holder in whose name the certificate is issued

While it is true that Birth Certificates are considered valuable securities that are traded amongst the private international entities and the elite, the holder in whose name the certificate is issued does not have access to such value.
Instead, by holding the Birth Certificate, the man or woman essentially consent to being treated as a pauper or peon and the sole obligation of the elite to provide mere scraps so that the man or woman does not die of starvation or great illness.

As Settlement Certificates and later Birth Certificates are solely and purposefully designed to disenfranchise men and woman from their rightful inheritance through voluntary enslavement and admission to being "paupers", the system of Birth Certificates is wholly without legitimacy, a global system of organized fraud and crime and without lawful effect.

Thursday, February 2, 2017

Yeah even researcher like Daniel Estulin admit the likes of Rockefeller are way down the totem pole. He mentions House of Braganza as being one of the richest.
These are the people that have all the natural minerals int he world, are they not? Idiots on youtube saying the Rothschilds have $400 trillion, idiots! Printing money is not the real power; controlling resources is!
I wonder what level you have to get to before you are told who your masters are? Does David Cameron bow to Queen Guelph?
Does Adolofo Nicholas take orders from these criminals? I would think he must? There has got to be a council dictating from ABOVE the Jesuits, who then coordinate the whole agenda.

Keenly

A lot of these families are hidden within other scions or family names like the Medici continue mostly through the powerful Orsini which the Medici mixed into in order to get status. There is no doubt that the Rockefeller’s have power and wealth but they’re a front control for all the oil and medical systems but it is all under the Rothschild family (The Worshipful Company of Apothecaries/Barbers & The Worshipful Company of Fuellers) who took control over these merchant houses using Jacob Schiff as their middle-man controlling Wall Street for New Venice. People have to understand that families like Rockefeller and Rothschild are not the true power but they’re a lower branch of the Illuminati not its head. The Cecil family wouldn’t accept the Bauer’s into their fold for a very long time. Now when one understands that the Cecil family was commanded by the Genoa originating Pallavicini family then one can see where the true power lies above the Rothschild today. The English flag has its origins from the powerful land of Genoa which eventually teamed up with Venice into the evil we have today using Britain (New Venice) as its command center and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as its whipping boy at the top above the U.S Military. I’ve highlighted many times before the connection of NATO to the 9/11 attacks and the theft of power over the region secretly into the hands of the U.K Ministry of Defence via Chicago.

David Rockefeller

The heads of the Illuminati are the Black Nobility of Europe such as the likes of Prince Vittorio Emanuele IV the Prince of Naples a man of extreme power, wealth and a high level member of the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem the most powerful of the Papal Orders which controlled all other orders during the crusades and which holds the largest Cardinal membership. I should remind you that Emanuele IV lays claim to the title of the King of Jerusalem challenging the House of Bourbon! Emanuele IV also controls the powerful banking canton of Geneva in Switzerland with his wife of the House of Doria. You should look into Borghese family and the Jesuit trained Lorenzo Borghese who was educated at the evil Fordham University the second most powerful University in the U.S. If you want another important player to look up then go for Albert Johannes Gabriel of the powerful House of Thurn and Taxis. Why not spend some time looking up the Gaetani Dell’Aquilla D’Aragona family and its connection to the Duke of Norfolk and their ties into the Giustiniani family? When you understand these families you can see how they master the intelligence networks like MI6, CIA so for the latter this is really a combination deeper than the Nazi SS and OSS it goes back to a combination of the OSS (US), X-2(MI6) and the Decima MAS (Italy/NATO). All these intelligence networks are commanded at the very top by the Order of Malta and its powerful Prelate Monsignor Angelo Acerbi.

Jacob Rothschild

The Rothschild family do have a lot of land and minerals and why wouldn’t they when they know the currency they print is an illusion for the imprisoned and slaved herd (Cestui Que Vie Act 1666). Rest assured the Rothschild’s have Allodial Title whilst you the herd are given a privilege of Fee Simple which is useless. From the data we have so far it is the New Doge of New Venice (Queen Elizabeth II) who has the most land and real wealth of this world when its tallied up. Now of course there are families such as the Pallavicini from Genoa who have tremendous wealth that should be more impressive than the Queen but we just do not have any records of their data which is most unfortunate. The Pallavicini family were funding wars for Kings into the millions in times when no one had even heard of such a figure let alone that much in a currency. I think I recall the Pallavicini funding the British Empire thirty-million against the Spanish in the 17th Century. I’m afraid great power can be had over a system that accepts and believes in an instrument of debt which you create like the Rothschild family do with the majority of the world’s currencies. The only way to be free of such debt slavery is to remove the central war bank and instead print up credit notes through your own Treasuries such as the Bradbury Pound and Greenback.

David Cameron will bow to the Dame of Malta and New Doge of New Venice Queen Elizabeth II when he has to first be in her presence just as members of the Vatican have to do towards the Jesuits when they mention their name (the Society of Jesus)! The Crooked Nose Clan’s David Cameron is a House of Keswick pimple in the grand scheme of real ancient power, he comes no where near the power of Nobility (Spencer family) Prime Ministers like Winston Churchill (Order of the Garter/Venetian Party of the North). Britain is a complicated mix of Roman, Norman and Venetian control somewhat amalgamated into one. You have to look at Orders like the Jesuit Order, Order of Malta (The Alliance of the Orders of St John of Jerusalem), Order of the Garter, City of London Corporation and Livery Companies, various ancient families then levels such as The Most Distinguished Order of Saint Michael and Saint George (Black Prince Philip) along with the Most Honourable Military Order of the Bath (Prince Charles) who protect the New Venice Empire for the Order of Malta through the intelligence networks. The power centers are the ancient city of Londinium (City of London) and Westminster the home of the Jesuit Provincial Office at Mount Street monitoring and controlling the New Doge (Queen) at Buckingham Palace.

Adolfo Nicolas SJ is now basically redundant since he resigned from his position as the Superior General of the Jesuits after being found guilty of child trafficking and satanic ritual abuses. Within the highest power levels of this conspiracy the members become almost of equal power and thus respecting one another. The Jesuits were set-up by the Venetians (roots go back to the Sarmatians) and elements of power from Spain in 1534 and the orders roots go back as far as the Knights Templar before this faction was moved into the Kingdom of Aragon under a new name (Order of the Calatrava) on orders of Pope Clement V. Please do not listen to Eric Phelps when he claims that the Superior General is the almighty of the Jesuit Order. The Black Pope hasn’t been the driving force of the Jesuits since World War II and I’ve informed you all that the driving forces are the JCUSA and CEP divisions of the Jesuits which I believe are still at war today regardless of a sense of false peace going back to the 1983 33rd General Congregation acceptance of Peter Hans Kolvenbach.

What we have is the World being mastered by the great minds of the Jesuits and what are known as The Ancients (Venetians). If you look you will find all the Nobility like King Juan Carlos and elite figures like Bill Clinton, Shimon Peres (exposed by Leah Rabin in her book ‘Rabin: Our Life, His Legacy‘) are trained by the Jesuit Order (military fortresses such as Georgetown University). When you look at the mindset imposed over the system and people such as the pseudo-science (Royal Society) and social engineering (Tavistock/Fabian Society) this all stems from Venice commanded from the Arsenale di Venezia using the likes of the Cini Foundation. You will notice I highlighted the connection of the Jesuit Boston College in the US with the Venice International University which is something on par with the likes of the Nobility controlled Round Square education of the Gordonstoun School in New Venice (Great Britain). I do believe that the Venetian power will soon dump Britain as it moves its financial hub (City of London/Wall Street) into Dubai, the political power into Iraq and the spiritual power into the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem the international city of the New Middle East. So by this time I expect Venice to come out of the shadows of Britain (New Venice) which it hides behind and once again bring back the visible power of ancient Venice. I believe the current independence movement in the region is just the start of Venice showing its victory in the battle of the Roman Empires.