"Look up the white supremacy movement Rod. They're closer to the kind of half baked birtherism you spew then liberalism."

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

White supremacists are not only racists (real racists), but also they are anarchists as well. The nut job who killed 6 Sihks this past weekend, who are some of the most peaceful people on the earth was totally uncalled for. Most likely the killer thought they were Muslim, when that is not the case.

Most of the hate spewed was from our left leaning friends here in the Swamp starting off with this good one from filmnoia:

" With all the guns and right wing anger around it's amazing that we don't have these events on a weekly basis.Right wingers are more prone to 2nd amendment solutions."Read more: http://swampland.time.com/2012...

Followed up quickly by 53underscore3 with

"I think that's something worth saying again, filmnoia. I don't know how many attempts on Obama's life there have been but HSA report doesn't scratch the surface, as "controversial" as it was.

I have a feeling that there have been far more attempts on Obama and government agencies during his time as POTUS than there ever was before, which, if true, would attest to the spectacular success the internal security agencies are having in dealing with it"

"It's coming out now from multiple sources that the guy that shoot up the Sikh temple has been involved in the white supremacist movement since at least 2000. The resident right wing posters here who have vilified Obama for the last 4 years for his "otherness" must have a tingle of excitement going up their legs this morning. One of their boys have made the big time. There are tens of thousands of these cretinous powderkegs walking around."

As a Liberal, I don't take any joy out of any massive killing. However, for the Muslim community, it must be a relief to find out the killer was not a Muslim terrorist. It is all about protection. Believe it or not African Americans are relieved when they hear a killer is a White person, because when an African Americans committed a crime, the whole community was attacked for the actions of one individual. In fact the massive murder of the Sikhs is a White guy's revenge against Muslim terrorists, even though Sikhs are not Muslims. That hasn't prevented attacks on Sikhs since 9/11.

As a White male, no one holds you personally accountable for the actions of other White males. However, if you are a minority, like an African American, or if you are a Muslim, you are held accountable for the actions within your "community".

The fact that the killer was a White guy, just means the Muslim community can breathe a sigh of relief they are will not be blamed for every act of domestic terrorism in this country.

"I guess it's really tough for you wingnuts to admit that a far right racist US based terrorist, the rightist killer up in Norway, and a Muslim terrorist in another country are brothers under the skin. Right wing fundamentalist extremist thought is deadly. Is today the day that your kind stops with the Obama is a Kenyan Marxist (or is it Socialist today) birtherist venom? I doubt whether you have it in you."

And, it keeps going on and on without fail. Those on the left from the swamp trying hard to connect this insane individual with conservatives, especially conservatives here in the swamp. When in fact the killer was closely related to anarchy through a white supremacist group, the same group of people who for the past year have delivered violence in our streets and called for the over throw of our government.

The only thing they haven't said yet is the guy was connected to the Tea Party, but I suspect this is yet to come.

Good job my lib loony nut jobs, you are only one brain cell away from this ruthless killer.

UPDATE:

kbanginmotown says:

"Are these the"2nd Amendment solutions" that the Tea Party was advocating a couple of years ago?"

The bill for establishing religious freedom. I had drawn in all the latitude of reason and right. It still met with opposition; but with some mutilations in the preamble, it was finally passed; and a singular proposition proved that its protection of opinion was meant to be universal,” wrote Jefferson. “Where the preamble declares that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed, by inserting the word ‘Jesus Christ,’ so that it should read ‘a departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion.’ The insertion was rejected by a great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan, the Hindoo, and infidel of every denomination.”