"For the moment, however, we must make a critical digression, to
explore the much-discussed relationship between Nazi Germany and the
Zionist movement. This has been the subject of so much misinformation
and deliberate disinformation, much of it spread by well-meaning folks
who don’t understand the “big picture.”

While there are those who have correctly pointed out that—during
the early years of the Nazi regime of Adolf Hitler—the German
government actually collaborated with elements of the Zionist movement
in Germany and elsewhere, this point has been largely misunderstood and misconstrued.

Some more naive and excitable folks have declared this to be proof
that “Hitler was a Zionist”and that the entire purpose of the creation
of the Third Reich was setting in place the Holocaust so that a Zionist
state could emerge from the ashes of the dead. This is quite a
lively thesis, but one which essentially relies on a lot of imagination
coupled with a fantastic and fanciful dependence upon a wide variety
of forces and events—not necessarily connected—falling into place in
order to achieve the final goal: a Zionist state.

While the National Socialist regime in
Germany did initially form some loose collaborative efforts with
Zionists in Europe and Palestine, seeing this as an ideal way to
convince and persuade Jews to leave Europe, these ties generally
disintegrated as the Germans recognized, during wartime, that
collaboration with the anti-Zionist Arabs in North Africa and the
Middle East was far more productive for German goals. So while there is truth that the Germans did collaborate with the Zionists, the matter has been largely overstated by persons who are unwilling or simply incapable of looking at the much-larger—and far more important—geopolitical picture.

Let it also be said that many of those who have adopted the stance that
“Hitler was a Zionist” often tend to be individuals—however
well-meaning they may be—who use that term to “prove” that they aren’t
“anti-Semitic,” as if to say “Well, even though I’m a critic of Israel,
I’m not ‘like Hitler’ since, after all, it was Hitler who helped bring
about the state of Israel.”

Those who tout this line fail to understand that the Jewish Power Elite
and the Zionist movement scoff at this stance and consider anyone who
even flirts with this theory to be just as bad as those others who are
outright, open critics of Israel, Zionism and the Jewish agenda.

In one instance a Jewish financier in Germany did give money to the
Nazi Party—prior to the rise to power of Adolf Hitler—but those funds
were designed to help Hitler’s intra-party opposition, to stop Hitler. But despite this fact, some “patriots” still say that “The Jews backed Hitler.”

Many of those who worship at the altar of this nonsense cite a flagrantly-fraudulent document of shadowy origins entitled Hitler’s Secret Backers, ostensibly written by one “Sidney Warburg,” one of those “Jewish bankers.” But this document, as we’ve said, is a fraud.
The late Dr. Antony Sutton’s Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler
has promoted this theory, based in part on the Warburg travesty and has
given further institutionalization to this mythology—the truth be
damned.

American banks and corporations did work with the Hitler regime,
usually a continuation of previous financial arrangements going back
decades, but this was not part of any grand conspiracy to bring Hitler
to power. The claim that the Bush family was integral to the rise of
Hitler is another myth.

Another nonsensical claim—that Hitler and most of the top Nazis were
actually Jews or part Jewish—has its primary origin in a virtually
impenetrable and quite bizarre work entitled Adolf Hitler: Founder of Israel.

Sadly, in the age of the Internet, this volume, which most of those who
quote it have never actually read, has been widely touted, even by a
handful of otherwise responsible souls who want to believe, it appears,
that Hitler was part of “the Jewish conspiracy.”

A talented American writer, Martin Kerr, has written an authoritative study,“The Myth of Hitler’s Jewish Grandfather,” which can be found on the Internet, which examines all of the theories
and meanderings on this topic and lays the theory to rest. But, again,
that doesn’t stop the sensationalists from saying “it must be true:
Hitler was a Jew and a Zionist.”

While all of this has been a distinct digression, it’s been a necessary
one, precisely because there is so much misinformation and deliberate
disinformation regarding the relationship between Adolf Hitler and the
Nazis and the Zionist and Jewish agenda that has littered the Internet
and published works throughout the last half century.

So, unfortunately, in order to bring history into accord with the facts, it is critical to address the nonsense.

For the record, let us return to our course of analysis—the issue of
Zionism and Judaism (vis-a-vis what we know today as the New World
Order). And we shall note this: the truth is that, over the years, there have been many people—admittedly anti-Jewish—who saw some wisdom in Zionism generally.

That is, they saw the departure of Jews from their lands and the
concentration of the Jewish population in a state all the Jews own
(although not necessarily in Arab Palestine) as a means of finally
resolving the age-old conflict between the Jews and all others.

In 1922, Theodore Fritsch, a well known German anti-Jewish writer, actually acknowledged his admiration for Zionist ideology:

We still consider the Zionists as the most honest of Jews, because they
admit that . . . there be no amalgamation with the non-Jewish people,
that the diverse races moreover mutually disturb each other in their
development and culture. We therefore demand together with the
Zionists “a clean separation” and the settlement of a Jews-only dominion.
. . .

If the reconstituted Jewish people wishes to rank itself as a nation
among the nations, then it is the duty and the interest of each one to
help it to do so. If it contemplates, on the contrary, organizing
itself internationally in order to ruin and dominate the nations, then
it is the duty of the latter to rise up and forbid it.

However, Batault recognized that, ultimately, Jewish teachings taught
that the Jews would come to rule the earth in its entirety:

As for the final result of the Messianic revolution, it will always be
the same; God will overthrow the kings and will cause Israel and its
king to triumph; the nations will be converted to Judaism, and will
obey the law or else they will be destroyed and the Jews will be the
masters of the world.

In France, during World War II, there was widespread opposition to Jewish influence, not only in theVichy Regime in Southern France, an independent regime which collaborated with Nazi Germany, but likewise even in the German occupied area of Northern France.

(Note this interesting aside: Many people today, especially un-learned
Americans, perceive Vichy France to be the “bad guys” who were
“anti-Semitic” and German Occupied France to be the “good guys” who “hated
the Nazis and opposed their anti-Semitic point of view” but the truth
is that opposition to Jewish power and influence was widespread throughout all of France, the legends of World War II notwithstanding.)

In any event, one writer who spoke about these concerns among the
French was Gabriel Malglaive, whose book Jewish or French? published in
1942, discussed measures taken in Vichy France designed to curtail
Jewish power. He said there were four principal aims underlying these
measures:

1. Resolutely to separate the Jews from the government . . . . That was
the first task and relatively the simplest, because it envisaged only a
small number. . . ;
2. To combat their intellectual influence,support and extensionof their
intrusion into the state; to separate them, to this end, from the
liberal professions, from teaching, from the press, etc;
3. To eliminate their “economic and financial” supremacy, their
preponderance in all branches of industry, commerce, the stock market
and the banks, that is, to de-Judaize this realm which had been theirs.
To act in such a manner that they would no longer retain the power of
money, the most fearful one, for if they had kept it, they would have,
in practice, conserved all the others;
4. To eliminate, finally, their occult power by keeping them away from
corporations, by purifying . . . the press and agencies through which
they established a cunning ropaganda and [their] de facto censorship . .
. .

In the end, he wrote, that what he and so many others considered “the
Jewish Problem” would have to be given what he called a “Jewish
Solution.” Ironically, Malglaive said, in the future the great powers
of the world, even including the Jewish people,would be forced to
recognize “the existence of the Jewish nation” and therefore assign a
territory which would be turned over to the Jewish nation.

This, of course, is, in fact, what we today know of as “Zionism.” The
result would be, said Malglaive, that from then on, “all of the Jews of
the world will possess legally, officially, the Jewish nationality
which their hearts have always secretly chosen.” The issue, he concluded,
was “whether wishing to settle the problem humanely we want to cease
being provoked by the Jews, or whether, continuing to apply
half-measures,we resign ourselves to a partial and thus poor settlement
of this Question.” (READ THE REST...)

" (...) Prince Bernhard zur
Lippe-Biesterfeld (1911-2004), who had a series of titles during his
lifetime, culminating in Prince of the Netherlands when he married Queen
Wilhelmina's daughter Juliana in 1937, joined the SA, the
National-Socialist League of Air Sports, the NSKK, and was a member of
the SS. Whatever loyalties he had to Hitler clearly dissipated: in 1936 he renounced his German nationality during a "chilly meeting" with Hitler, and he agreed with Dutch Queen Wilhelmina in opposing "the Führer
[who] was keen to treat the wedding as the alliance of two countries
.... Hitler responded by trying to stop his relatives [from] attending
the ceremony. In 1940 Prince Bernhard helped the Dutch royal family
escape to Great Britain, and from 1942 to 1944 worked for the Royal Air force (on at least one occasion overcoming Queen Wilhelmina's ban on his participation in active combat by flying under an assumed name). (...) Queen Wilhelmina made him Commander of the Netherlands armed forces in 1944, and the following year, he accepted the German surrender at Wageningen." (PDF - Royals and the Reich, jonathan Petropoulos, 2006)

"One of the visitors who might have profited from such advice was
Bernhard, prince of Lippe-Biesterfeld, who had married Crown Princess
Juliania of the Netherlands in 1937. Although as a former party member -
and now Prince Bernhard of the Netherlas, as Hitler recounted with
disdain - he had always maintained how closely he felt the tie with his
"atherland Germany". Hitler realised when they took their leave of each
other that he had been dealing with a 'windbag'. When I offered him my
hand in parting', Hitler said, 'I held a lazy, limp leaf.' The
'reorientation of the prince's conscience and felleings' was treason to
Volk and Fatherland'. If Hitler originally thought that, by the presence
of the prince in Amstredam and The Hague , he could build a bastion of
the Reich there, that handshake alone had shown hmi that he was sadly
mistaken." (Source: PDF - With Hitler to the End: The Memoir of Hitler's Valet, 2009, by Heinz Linge,Roger Moorehouse) Voir aussi Hitlers Table Talk (2000).

another of [Rosenbaum's] good friends in high places was Prince Bernhard,
consort of the Queen of the Netherlands, who invited him to the royal
Palace in Holland to lecture leading Dutch bankers on good business
practices. Here too a scandal ensued, when the Prince sold a castle, the
Warmelo, for 400000$ to a Lichtenstein firm, Evlyma Inc., owned by Rosenbaum [BCI]. Just why this castle was sold to the Swiss banker, for what he described a ridiculously low price has never been made clear." (Rapporté dans Final Judgment, de Michael Collins Piper.)

Three current news stories—taken together—illustrate that
things are not always as they seem. Take, for example, a new revelation about
the Bilderberg group released by Internet voice Alex Jones in the wake of last
week’s Bilderberg meeting in Virginia, where Jones joined a crowd jeering the
assembled would-be world rulers.

Although Jones has insisted Bilderberg is some sort of
remnant of the Nazi regime of Adolf Hitler devoted to a modern-day Nazi agenda,
a report on Jones’s own website effectively admits Bilderberg’s program is
distinctly anti-Nazi.

Citing the papers of former Sen. Fred Harris (D-Okla.), who
attended Bilderberg’s 1966 meeting in Wiesbaden, Germany, Jones points out that
Harris recorded the remarks of top Bilderberg figure, labor leader Walter
Reuther, who outlined Bilderberg’s underlying agenda: “Nationalism is
dangerous.”

WWII-era German National Socialism—Nazism —of course, was
very much nationalist in every sense, and the fact nationalism was denounced at
Bilderberg gives a clear picture of the real Bilderberg point of view, rumors
notwithstanding.

Jones mentions Bilderberg’s founder, Prince Bernhard of the
Netherlands, had been a Nazi Party member. But what Jones does not mention is that
Bernhard left the party in 1934, a year after Hitler came to power, and by 1940
was a top leader of the anti-Nazi resistance in Europe. So by the time Bernhard
became Bilderberg chief, he had undergone a serious political transformation.

What’s more, as careful historians know, Hitler held
Bernhard in contempt. In his recorded Table Talk and in the memoirs of his
valet, Hitler is recalled scoffing satirically at Bernhard, and questioning his
intelligence, integrity and loyalty.

This 1938 portrait of Hitler, entitled The Standard Bearer, depicts
the Fuehrer as an armored European knight defending Europe
and Christianity. The painting was very popular in poster and
postcard form. It was created by Hubert Lanzinger.

HERE’S WHAT DIDN’T HAPPEN, but could so easily have been: In Western Europe, in the autumn of 1941:The RedArmy sweeps south from Germany and France into Italy and Spain. Everywhere the NKGB imposes the bloody terror already suffered by the tortured nations of the east.Millions are rounded up—anti-Communists, formermilitary officers, shopkeepers, land owners including small farmers, members of youth movements and cultural associations.The luckier ones are shot outright. Many more die horribly in the blood-soaked basements of Soviet interrogation centers.The rest join endless columns shuffling off to Siberia and the Gulag Archipelago. Only the prettiest girls are kept behind, alive, for now. There is an epidemic of rape. The lower ranks of the new Red puppet administrations consist mainly of sadistic criminals and psychopathic perverts, many of them Jewish. The key posts everywhere are overwhelmingly dominated by Jews.
Too late, the people of Europe learn that their new masters take literally the Talmudic admonition, “The best of the ‘goyim’ [a scurrilous word for non-Jews] must be destroyed.”
How close this nightmarish scenario came to becoming reality is revealed in Russian military historian Viktor Suvorov’s definitive account of the buildup to Operation Groza (“Thunderstorm”), the RedArmy’smassive assault on Germany and the rest of Europe scheduled to begin on July 6, 1941.
Icebreaker, by Suvorov, details the huge scale of the lengthy Soviet preparations to attack theWest. In 1939, for example, when Hitler had a total of 4,000 paratroopers ready to seize key points ahead of an advance, Stalin had more than one million. Soviet tank production dwarfed that of the rest of the world put together, but the majority of the tanks were capable of effective operation only on the good roads ofWestern Europe and were useless when forced onto the defensive in the backward wastes of Russia. Soviet pilots were totally untrained in aerial combat, since the German Luftwaffe was to be destroyed on the ground on Day 1 of Operation Thunderstorm.
As things turned out (as the chief of the General Staff Academy of the Armed Forces of the USSR, Gen. S.P. Ivanov, admitted in 1974), “The Nazi command succeeded in forestalling our troops, literally two weeks before the war” was supposed to begin.
This was why the advancing German Wehrmacht found millions of Russia’s best troops crowded together with huge supplies of ammunition, fuel, airplanes and tanks in indefensible positions right on the frontier.
Suvorov shows clearly how Stalin came within 14 days of taking this key step along the Marxist-Leninist path to ultimately bolshevizing the world, including America. But Hitler guessed Stalin’s design. That is why WWII ended “catastrophically” for Stalin. He “only” got half of Europe (thanks to Roosevelt and Churchill), and some places here and there in Asia.
Regardless of the abuse heaped on him by the media and the establishment historians, this book proves Adolf Hitler is the savior of the West (and the East). For more on this subject see our package of articles in this issue on Viktor Suvorov, Icebreaker and Operation Barbarossa, starting on page 35.
—JOHN TIFFANY
Assistant Editor

PREFACECHAPTER I"We Are Fighting In Defense of Freedom" (Lord Halifax)CHAPTER II" We Are Meeting a Challenge to Our Own Security" (Lord Halifax)CHAPTER III"We are defending therights of all Nations to live their own lives" and "fighting against the substitution of brute force for Law as the arbiter between Nations." (Lord Halifax)CHAPTER IV"We Are Fighting Against the Violation of the Sanctity of Treaties and Disregard of the Pledged Word" (Lord Halifax)CHAPTER V"We Are Fighting Today for the Preservation of Christian Principles" (The (London) Times, 17th Feb. 1940)CHAPTER VI"We Are Fighting As Our Fathers Fought to Uphold the Doctrine That All Men Are Equal In the Sight of God" (Franklin D. Roosevelt, 6th Jan. 1942)CHAPTER VII "We Are Fighting for Democracy"CHAPTER VIII The Theory That High Finance Caused the WarCHAPTER IX The Object Is to Destroy Fascism and HitlerismCHAPTER XUnprepared and BlindfoldedCHAPTER XIHitler Always Knew His Real EnemyCHAPTER XIIHitler Wanted Peace With BritainCHAPTER XIIIHow Britain Was Egged On to Make WarCHAPTER XIVThe Jews Acknowledge Their Power and ThreatenCHAPTER XVThe Jews Declare WarCHAPTER XVIThe Jewish WarCHAPTER XVIIThe Peace: Britain Defeated Whoever WinsCHAPTER XVIIIConclusion

(...)

Chapter VIII

THE THEORY THAT HIGH FINANCE CAUSED THE WAR

There is a school of thought which believes that International Finance with
its preponderant Jewish interest and the Monetary System under which most of
the world has suffered from mass unemployment was doomed to be
superseded by Hitler's credit system based upon a goods standard and
international barter. This would displace gold, the tool of the Internationalists.
I believe this myself.

But some go so far as to say that the war was brought about so that, if
Hitler could be defeated, the Gold Standard Monetary System, which is
fraudulent, could be maintained to the benefit of Wall Street and other large
Gold Controllers.

I do not believe that.

It might be worth a war from the point of view of Wall Street, but it
would not be worth this war. This war shows every trace of our having been
dragged into it blindfolded and unprepared. Wall Street would not have
allowed that.Wall Street knows that if the Germans won the war, there would
be no more Wall Street.

In my opinion there was more to it than the survival of the fraudulent
Gold Standard System. The necessities of racial survival made it urgent for the
Jews to act without delay. Their considerable influence in Wall Street together
with other participants in the spoils of the fraudulent system made it not too
difficult to get the "Street" to support a war which was represented as
inevitable.

This is not the place to go into the intricacies of monetary systems. The
kernel of the problem is that credit based upon gold is insufficient for the needs
of modern commerce. A short supply of money and credit is best for the usurer
or money-lender, since scarcity raises the rate of interest borrowers must pay.
Power to regulate the amount of money and credit available enables the
controllers of Gold to dominate world affairs, economically and politically. The
creation of inextinguishable national debts is part of the system of control and
with control goes domination. This system of economic and financial bondage
was doomed by the expansion of the barter system developed by National
Socialist Germany. (For a more detailed explanation see the chapter, The Peace
We Lost in A PEOPLE'S RUNNYMEDE, by Robert Scrutton, Andrew Dakers,
publisher.)

Chapter IX

The Object is to Destroy Fascism and Hitlerism

At last we approach facts.

Certainly
we went to war with the object of destroying Fascism and Hitlerism. But
the people were not allowed to know this till it was too late to
withdraw, or they would not have sanctioned it, had they had an
opportunity to do so. It was not Hitler or a Fascist form of Government
that was objected to but that both opposed the Jewish influence in their
domestic affairs.

President Roosevelt, in a letter to the International Labour Office Conference in 1944, said:

"The
welfare of the world's population and their liberty are the first and
ultimate concern of those dedicated to root out from this earth every
trace of Nazi ideas and Nazi methods."

The London Times' leading article of 26th September 1939, said:

"We
have gone to war with the single-minded determination to rid Europe of a
particular menace whose presence is incompatible with the continuance
of civilized life, and it is the simplicity of this claim that resolves
what the Duce feels to be inconsistency in our discrimination between
Hitler and his Russian accomplice. We believe that the Russian action,
lawless and treacherous as we must declare it to be, is a secondary and
subordinate consequence of the original crime. The Soviet has not been a
party to Hitler's previous outrages and has not shown itself to be in
essence an aggressive power."

The Duce was not the only
man to see inconsistency in the discrimination in favour of the
Soviets, despite this dead-lame explanation.

On plenty
of other occasions, politicians have assured us that we are fighting to
destroy Fascism. But they do not tell us why they deem it so necessary.
There was a time when it did not appear to be a necessity to Winston
Churchill. In his Great Contemporaries he wrote:

"Those
who have met Herr Hitler face to face in public business or on social
terms have found a highly competent, cool, well-informed functionary
with an agreeable manner, a disarming smile."

Again in STEP BY STEP, Churchill wrote of Herr Hitler:

"If
our country were defeated, I hope we should find a champion as
indomitable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among
the nations."

But of Russia, Churchill said in 1920:

"The Soviet system is barbarism worse than the Stone Age."

In a broadcast on 20th January 1940 he said:

"Everyone can see how Communism rots the soul of a nation . . ."

And later in the year on 1st April, he said:

"Communism is a deadly mental and moral disease."

From
this it is not understandable why Churchill should be leading the
British Empire in a war to destroy National Socialism with the aid of
Bolshevik Russia.

Of Italian Fascism, Churchill said in a speech on 11th November 1938:

"Italy
has shown that there is a way of fighting the subversive forces and
rallying the masses of the people, properly led, to value and wish to
defend the honour and stability of civilized society. Hereafter no great
nation will be unprovided with an ultimate means of protection against
the cancerous growth of Bolshevism."

As far back as 1926 the Financial News reported that a Committee of British Residents in Florence announced:

"We
wish to state most clearly and emphatically that there exists here
today nothing that can be justly termed either tyranny or suppression of
personal freedom as guaranteed by constitutional law in any civilized
land. We believe that Mussolini enjoys the enthusiastic support and
admiration of the Italian people who are contented, orderly and
prosperous to a degree hitherto unknown in Italy, and probably without
parallel at the present time among other great European nations still
suffering from the war."

Sympathetic readers will
smile when they are reminded that in 1933 the Financial Times brought
out a special eight-page Supplement under the caption:

The Renaissance of Italy Fascism's Gift of Order and Progress

The
solution of the mystery is that in those days Fascism had not yet
grappled with Jewish influences dominating the nation's affairs.
Giuseppe Toeplitz, Polish born Jew, had just retired from the management
of the Banca Commerciale Italiana, which a New York Times dispatch from
Milan on January 29, 1938 (the date of Signor Toeplitz's death)
estimated controlled one-seventh of all Italian industries.

We
Fascists have noticed with amusement how our own Government is forced
by the pressure of necessity to adopt many of the policies of Fascism.
We may instance the recognition of Agriculture as basic among the
industries; the necessity of ensuring that the Land is not misused by
those farming it and the corporative organization of certain industries
and professions.

The International Labour Office
issued a report in April 1944 in which the activities of the German
Labour Front established by Hitler were recommended to be "adapted for
future use" after our victory. Facilities for workmen's travel,
recreation and other sparetime activities, for vocational training and
research on labour protection; the "Beauty of Work" service — "Kraft
durch Freude" (Strength through Joy) in the National Socialist Labor
Program — and the Labour Bank, "one of the chief credit institutions . .
. of the whole of Europe"; "it should also be the responsibility of the
Labour Commissioners," the Report of I.L.O. further outlines, "to
continue all administrative services required for the administration of
labor and social legislation — employment services, social insurance and
the labour inspectorate." The I. L. O. Philadelphia Labor Charter
actually purloins direct from Fascism its notions of industrial
organizations! "It insists," says the London Times of 13th May 1944, "on
the employers' right to combine freely, and declares also that if
workers and employers combine to run industry collectively, there must
be a third element — the Government — to cooperate and see that the rest
of the community is not exploited." Similar proposals are found in the
1944 Report on Reconstruction issued by the Grand Council of the Trade
Union Congress.

It was on these principles that the
Fascist Corporative Organization of Industry was based! Then why should
we be so keen to destroy all this? There can be but one plausible
answer. National Socialism and Fascism opposed the Jewish influence in
the domestic affairs of their respective countries. That we have ample
proof that National Socialism and Fascism were good governments for the
Germans and the Italians of their respective countries, apparently, is
of no consideration. Is it that only Jewish interests matter the world
over?

We may venture to doubt whether better
Government for "liberated" Italy than the Fascist one can be achieved
with the material at hand. Just consider this London Times report of the
25th April 1944:

"As most members of the new Cabinet
are Republicans, a form of procedure was devised whereby Ministers,
before taking oath, signed a declaration stating that they had accepted
office with the purpose of serving the best interests of the country,
but without attaching any permanent significance to the ceremony."

It
was from such "accommodating scoundrels" as this that Fascism saved
Italy for twenty years. At the time of this writing, every so-called
"liberated" country begins a campaign of violence and outrage against
its most active anti-communist elements. The same conditions are at once
reproduced from which their Fascist or semi-Fascist Governments of the
past had saved them.

“John Joseph Loftus (February 12, 1950) is an American author, former
U.S. government prosecutor and former Army intelligence officer. He is a
president of The Intelligence Summit and, although he is not Jewish, a
president of the Florida Holocaust Museum. Loftus also serves on the
Board of Advisers to Public Information Research.(...)

He began working for the U.S. Department of Justice in 1977 and in
1979 joined their Office of Special Investigations, which was charged
with prosecuting and deporting Nazi war criminals in the US. Loftus’
now-expired Web site claimed, “As a young U.S. Army officer, John Loftus
helped train Israelis on a covert operation that turned the tide of
battle in the 1973 Yom Kippur War.”(...)

He also writes regularly for Ami, an Orthodox Jewish weekly news magazine.

On August 7, 2005, he provided the United States address of an
alleged terrorist named Iyad K. Hilal on Fox News. Only afterwards was
it revealed that Hilal had left the address three years previously and
the home was now owned by a family, which was then subjected to threats
and vandalism and required police protection as a result of Loftus’
words. Fox terminated Loftus’s contract to commentate after the event.
Loftus said “I thought it might help police in that area now that we
have positively identified a terrorist,” but he did not say why he did
not contact police in a more direct manner. Loftus apologized for the
mistake and expressed frustration about “one federal [agency’s]”
inaction on an earlier tip he had given them years ago due to the same
address." [Wikipedia.org]

John
Loftus - Author of The Secret War Against the Jews, a new book which
claims that anti-Israel partisans in the American intelligence community
have sought to sabotage the state of Israel. (Loftus is a former
attorney with the Nazi-hunting Office of Special Investigations.)