FreedomWorks - twinkieshttp://www.freedomworks.org/fieldtags/twinkies
enFrom Twinkies to Obamacare, a Rough Time for Unionshttp://www.freedomworks.org/content/twinkies-obamacare-rough-time-unions
<div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even" property="content:encoded"><p>To the chagrin of Michael Bloomberg and Michelle Obama, America's favorite cream-filled snack cakes are rolling off the assembly line. After a union standoff drove Hostess Brands out of business, new owners purchased the company. They hired a non-union staff and are now sending Twinkies to retailers from coast to coast.</p><p>The Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union (BCTGM) is unhappy with this right-to-work resurrection since it’s the union that nearly drove Twinkies to extinction. BCTGM has announced that the new Hostess Brands must immediately let them back in the bakery doors, if they know what's good for them.</p><p>“Despite the fanfare, the long-term viability of this effort is highly uncertain,” the <a href="http://on.wsj.com/13FZ0q0" target="_blank">BCTGM said in a statement Friday</a>. “Rather than hire professional, experienced bakers who have produced quality snack cakes in the company’s bakeries for decades, Hostess management has chosen instead to hire primarily workers with little or no experience in the demanding wholesale snack cake baking industry.”</p><p>Far be it from me to impugn the demanding wholesale snack cake baking industry, but it appears Twinkies, Ho Hos and Chocodiles will get along just fine without the folks that put them on life support. But BCTGM isn't the only labor union unhappy these days.</p><p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/corporate-intelligence/2013/07/12/union-letter-obamacare-will-destroy-the-very-health-and-wellbeing-of-workers/" target="_blank">Three powerful unions sent a scathing letter</a> to Democratic leaders in Congress to complain about Obamacare. When President Obama arbitrarily gave companies an extra year to comply with his signature achievement, unions seem to have been blindsided. Leaders of the Teamsters, UFCW, and UNITE-HERE warned Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi that unless changes are made, Obamacare will “destroy the foundation of the 40 hour work week that is the backbone of the American middle class.”</p><p>The rest of the letter isn’t much better for Reid, Pelosi or Obama. I would simply excerpt it, but <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/corporate-intelligence/2013/07/12/union-letter-obamacare-will-destroy-the-very-health-and-wellbeing-of-workers/" target="_blank">the whole thing</a> deserves a close read by Americans on both sides of the aisle:</p><blockquote><p>When you and the President sought our support for the Affordable Care Act (ACA), you pledged that if we liked the health plans we have now, we could keep them. Sadly, that promise is under threat. Right now, unless you and the Obama Administration enact an equitable fix, the ACA will shatter not only our hard-earned health benefits, but destroy the foundation of the 40 hour work week that is the backbone of the American middle class.</p><p>Like millions of other Americans, our members are front-line workers in the American economy. We have been strong supporters of the notion that all Americans should have access to quality, affordable health care. We have also been strong supporters of you. In campaign after campaign we have put boots on the ground, gone door-to-door to get out the vote, run phone banks and raised money to secure this vision.</p><p>Now this vision has come back to haunt us.</p><p>Since the ACA was enacted, we have been bringing our deep concerns to the Administration, seeking reasonable regulatory interpretations to the statute that would help prevent the destruction of non-profit health plans. As you both know first-hand, our persuasive arguments have been disregarded and met with a stone wall by the White House and the pertinent agencies. This is especially stinging because other stakeholders have repeatedly received successful interpretations for their respective grievances. Most disconcerting of course is last week’s huge accommodation for the employer community—extending the statutorily mandated “December 31, 2013” deadline for the employer mandate and penalties.</p><p>Time is running out: Congress wrote this law; we voted for you. We have a problem; you need to fix it. The unintended consequences of the ACA are severe. Perverse incentives are already creating nightmare scenarios:<br>First, the law creates an incentive for employers to keep employees’ work hours below 30 hours a week. Numerous employers have begun to cut workers’ hours to avoid this obligation, and many of them are doing so openly. The impact is two-fold: fewer hours means less pay while also losing our current health benefits.</p><p>Second, millions of Americans are covered by non-profit health insurance plans like the ones in which most of our members participate. These non-profit plans are governed jointly by unions and companies under the Taft-Hartley Act. Our health plans have been built over decades by working men and women. Under the ACA as interpreted by the Administration, our employees will treated differently and not be eligible for subsidies afforded other citizens. As such, many employees will be relegated to second-class status and shut out of the help the law offers to for-profit insurance plans.</p><p>And finally, even though non-profit plans like ours won’t receive the same subsidies as for-profit plans, they’ll be taxed to pay for those subsidies. Taken together, these restrictions will make non-profit plans like ours unsustainable, and will undermine the health-care market of viable alternatives to the big health insurance companies.</p><p>On behalf of the millions of working men and women we represent and the families they support, we can no longer stand silent in the face of elements of the Affordable Care Act that will destroy the very health and wellbeing of our members along with millions of other hardworking Americans.</p><p>We believe that there are common-sense corrections that can be made within the existing statute that will allow our members to continue to keep their current health plans and benefits just as you and the President pledged. Unless changes are made, however, that promise is hollow.</p><p>We continue to stand behind real health care reform, but the law as it stands will hurt millions of Americans including the members of our respective unions.We are looking to you to make sure these changes are made.</p><p>James P. Hoffa, General President, International Brotherhood of Teamsters</p><p>Joseph Hansen, International President, UFCW</p><p>D. Taylor, President, UNITE-HERE</p></blockquote><p>Pelosi insisted that we pass Obamacare to find out what was in it. It hasn’t even been enacted and we’re finding out it’s a disaster for everyone involved.</p><p>Those of us on the right side of the aisle were mentally prepared for the nightmare to come, but the ACA’s biggest fans are belatedly experiencing a rude awakening. Hopefully voters across America are learning that unintended consequences consistently foil the grandest plans of government technocrats and bakery-floor activists.</p><p>Twinkies aren’t great for your health, but Obamacare is much, much worse.</p><p><em>Follow Jon on Twitter at <a href="https://twitter.com/ExJon" target="_blank">@ExJon</a>.</em></p></div></div></div>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:44:23 +0000joncgabriel57607 at http://www.freedomworks.orghttp://www.freedomworks.org/content/twinkies-obamacare-rough-time-unions#commentsHostess Foods in Liquidation after Labor Disputehttp://www.freedomworks.org/content/hostess-foods-liquidation-after-labor-dispute
<div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even" property="content:encoded"><p>Hostess Brands is now going out of business and <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/11/16/hostess-brands-to-liquidate-lay-off-18500-after-crippling-union-fight/">18,500</a> workers are unemployed after six days of striking at more than <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/blog/morning-roundup/2012/11/hostess-threatens-to-close-if-strikes.html">20</a> plants. With the company in Chapter 11 (for the second time since 2004), Hostess had asked employees to make concessions in order to stay in business, giving workers until 5:00pm yesterday to resume work. In court, they won the right to make these changes. "We simply do not have the financial resources to survive an ongoing national strike," Hostess Chief Executive Gregory Rayburn <a href="http://news.msn.com/us/hostess-may-close-down-for-good-if-workers-do-not-return-by-thursday?ocid=ansnews11">said</a> in a statement. The <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2012/11/14/news/companies/hostess-liquidation-thursday/index.html">Teamsters</a> have accepted Hostess’ offer for their workers, but the bakers’ union was completely unwilling to do so.</p> <p>The company, which is now 82 years old, has been battling the <a href="http://bctgm.org/">Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union</a>.&nbsp; The union employs around 5,000 Hostess‘ 18,500 employees. The 300 plus workers who are on strike were been told that, if they did not return to work by 5:00 yesterday, they would be out of a job.&nbsp; In that case, work would cease as early as Tuesday for some companies.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p>These 300 workers have now forced all Hostess workers to become unemployed. Before liquidation, Hostess had already been forced to close 36 bakeries due to the strike, leaving 627 workers unemployed in Seattle, St. Louis, and Cincinnati. Bakers’ union president Frank Hurt is unwilling for the union to take responsibility for their actions “Our members are on strike because they have had enough," bakers' union president Frank Hurt <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2012/11/14/news/companies/hostess-liquidation-thursday/index.html">said</a>. "They are not willing to take draconian wage and benefit cuts on top of the significant concessions they made in 2004 and give up their pension so that the Wall Street vulture capitalists in control of this company can walk away with millions of dollars.” As a privately held company, financial information is not publicly available.&nbsp;</p> <p>Hostess saw things very differently. "We deeply regret the necessity of today's decision, but we do not have the financial resources to weather an extended nationwide strike," Chief Executive Gregory Rayburn <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/11/16/hostess-brands-to-liquidate-lay-off-18500-after-crippling-union-fight/">said</a>. "Hostess Brands will move promptly to lay off most of its 18,500-member workforce and focus on selling its assets to the highest bidders."&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p>However, Hostess fans need not despair completely. it is possible that popular names such as Twinkies, Ding Dongs, and Wonder Bread will still live on as they would likely be bought by another company.&nbsp;</p></div></div></div>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:12:25 +0000AmeliaHamilton55741 at http://www.freedomworks.orghttp://www.freedomworks.org/content/hostess-foods-liquidation-after-labor-dispute#comments