from filthy rags to righteous fruit

An in depth look at
scripture
revealing

the truth of
why

"Jesus"
Is not "God" / Yah'ushua
is not
Elohim

and
how the
'3-in-one=1' doctrine does not
add up.

This is intended to
be a
thorough refutation of the ridiculous "Jesus is God" heresy.

We will use what
the scriptures teach and what the Messiah and his Father actually say.

We will shut the mouths of
lying "theologians"(sky deity scholars), the
Vatican

(minister of
death) and pagan
"church fathers" (fathers of lies) once and for all.

(A work
in progress - Last updated 28/11/2017)

Foreword

"God",
"Jesus", "Lord" "LORD"and eg "faith", "church" etc are words
used
in
the corrupted scripture translations which have pagan connections.

eg Glory comes from the Latin word "gloria" which is identified with
the Sun as being radiant, shining, brilliant, bright as the sun.
"Gloria" was a Roman goddess that was half-naked and held the zodiac
signs. Splendour /splendid, honour / honorable
are better words. For more pagan words explained see Sunday Worship Terms.

For
the sake of those who are still coming
to the
knowledge of the truth we may use them in this article but where
possible we place them in brackets after the correct word and preceded
by
"pw" (pagan word). Eg. Elohim (pw God). "Old Testament" and
"New Testament" are
also misleading pagan words and will be
replaced by "Everlasting Covenant" and "Renewed Everlasting
Covenant" hereafter abbreviated as EC and REC respectively. The shared
Video, from an
external source, after our
discussion will also show why the incorrect use of "God" instead of
"Elohim" further causes confusion and thus acceptance of the "trinity"
heresy.

In a message he shared on his Facebook wall, Mabera
berated the pastor for regularly describing Jesus Christ as God.

He wrote: “I am filing a case to the Federal High Court
of Nigeria against Pastor T.B. Joshua and co-pastors for speaking a lie
against Jesus Christ by calling him God.”

The Islamic teacher said he regularly watched Joshua’s
popular television channel Emmanuel TV, wondering why the prophet
should address Jesus as God in front of thousands of his listeners.

He added: “I was completely aghast when I heard the
‘so-called’ Prophet T.B. Joshua of Emmanuel TV calling Jesus God in the
presence of thousands of his audience, among whom were
professors, doctors, reverend fathers and mothers, pastors and bishops.”

“As I was watching T.B. Joshua speaking through Emmanuel
TV and his audience helplessly watching and listening to his
accumulated lies...I almost cried with automatic alacrity when he said
that Jesus is Almighty God.

“My conclusion was that both TB Joshua and other
Christians actually read their Bible without proper understanding of
what they are reading”, he claimed.

Source: the SunNewsOnline

The two
idolatrous religions (Islam,
Christianity-Catholicism)
all falsely claim monotheism (generally speaking). I lump
Christianity and Catholicism together as one since they are both
Babylonian
syncretisms and not the true doctrine of the scriptures (pw bible). The
reason for being
this way, is because they (Masons: Shriners, Knights of Malta (pictured
here), Crusaders, Ottomans, Club of Rome,
Iluminati,
Jesuits,
Church institutions / Denominations, World Council of Churches, Vatican
etc etc) love this world and its temptations so through
organised false religion and political agendas, power games and
megalomania they corrupt the world and serve satan. They are earth
centred
rather than seeking the true light of Yahuah (pw God) and
his rule and reign in the hearts of believers of his
congregation who obey his To'rah and look forward
to eternal life with The Father and his Son in shamayim (pw heaven).

Many
Muslims, strangely, would appear to see the light when it comes
to the truth that the
scriptures do not teach that "Jesus is God". How is it possible that
this wayward religion of Islam also with such darkness and deception
has
this bit of
light while the
so-called Christian world, which claims to have the light, goes about
trying to shine its dark, non-scriptural trinity doctrine into the eyes
of the world? It is simple, they
have all been deceived and influenced by Catholicism and its Babylonian
roots. Some do know the truth but choose to continue spreading the
lie. They
choose to select only scriptures or parts of scripture that they like
and replace the rest with the tradition and doctrines of men,
because they are hooked on unrighteousness. At the end of the day they
hate Yah'uah and his To'rah. There are of course
those who, within each of these false religions, are beginning to seek
the
truth and love of the Father and his Son and are coming out of Babylon
by the chesed (pw grace) of
Yahuah (pw God).

Muslims
wish to use scripture to correclty prove that Jesus is
not God / Yah'ushua is not Elohim,
but they do this only with the intent to corrupt the truth further and
deny Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) also as the
Son
of Yah'uah (pw God). Of course they are denying the scripture which
clearly declares him as the Son of Yah'uah. Catholics on the other
hand, including their
daughter Christian denominations, choose the trinity lie to promote a
new religion which rejects To'rah and which they claim was started by
their version of Messiah they like to call "Jesus" (J-zeus , J-Esus).
They claim he is a god / God,
and so they
are no different to the Muslims since by claiming he is God they too
deny that the true Messiah, Yah'ushua is the obedient Son of Yahuah and
subject to him. It is the
same poison only a different flavour. This Jesus (J-Zeus) god must
receive "divinity", as
they call it, a non-scriptural word like any other pagan word "diva" or
"deity" who must bring some new
doctrine from the Greek metropolis or Roman pantheon of gods which are
merely
re-inventions of Babylonian sky deities. The ultimate goal then is that
the To'rah may be done away with by this revamped Babylonian sky deity
J(Zeus) god ruling this pagan Graeco-Roman religion: Christianity and
its
new pagan system called "church" which tries to replace the "assembly"
or
"congregation" of true Yahudim (worshippers of Yah).

The
third idolatrous religion falsely claiminig monotheism is of course
Judaism
(generally speaking). It follows rabbinic tradition, Talmud, Zoar,
Kabbalah
instead of the scriptures alone, to the point of breaking To'rah itself
(despite its constant claims to the opposite). It
rightfully fights the real glaring heresy of this trinity and
"Jesus is God" abomination but it does so only to debunk the whole of
the real and true good message (pw gospel) of the Messiah Yah'ushua (
Matthew to Revelations) as heresy and idolatry. It tries to undermine
the Father by denying his prophesied Son who
came to fully preach
To'rah because it wants to commit its own idolatry and rather
follow rabbis with men's traditions as gods rather than Elohim (pw God)
and thus re-invent
To'rah and the prophets to their liking. This then is no different to
the other
two To'rah-less and idolatrous religions: Islam and
Christianity-Catholicism.

Overcoming the Ugly Face of the Trinity

Overcoming
the trinity lie first requires one to simply dig up its
sandy foundation. It accuses the victim by saying
that in
denying the
"trinity" one somehow makes the Son of Elohim (pw God) less
than
what he is, ie.
not "divine" or less "divine" than the Father, and then send you off to
a place incorrectly called "hell". Yet, one can see right
through the cloak and dagger, since, once the victim is gripped by this
first fear of so-called heresy against this pagan 'church institution',
the false teachers, like wolves, then sink their teeth in
deeper exposing their victim to the
next
level of lies, that "Jesus" is indeed the very "Divine" Father himself!
The victim very easily jumps with fear from the teeth of a so-called
heresy right into the mouth of a real blasphemy.

When
one realises the word "divine" is a pagan concept applied to pagan sky
deities, and
has no place in scripture in the first place, one immediately sees
where the doctrine is coming from: Babylon! The pagan translators have
inserted Babylonian words throughout the scriptures (pw bible) which
have no place
in the thoughts of a true
believer. Secondly when one attributes to the Son what has
not
been attributed to him in the scriptures, ie. a pagan concept
-"divinity", then that person
is the heretic! He, nor his Father, are "divine" or "deities" of any
kind
. These are pagan titles with pagan idolatrous concepts.The Father and
Son are not sky deities- they exist in the highest heights -
third
shamayim (pw heaven). This is beyond any created sky itself. Yahuah the
Father
is the living
Elohim, the creator and possessor of shamayim (pw heaven) and earth and
he has begotten his first begotten Son Yah'ushua, whom he has appointed
authority to, under his very own name. Thus Yah'uah gives his Son part
of
his name, Yah'ushua, referring to the fact that Yahuah is the one who
saves his people through His kinsman (Son) redeemer and our kinsman
(who are believers). He has been given
"power of attorney" as it were, he is our advocate. This does not give
him power to be
Elohim. Denying the
"trinity" does not strip the
Son of Yahuah from his rightful
position or title nor does it strip him of his appointed authority.
Exalting Yah'ushua the Son of Elohim
in the correct
way, on the other hand, will always reveal the Son's
remaining subservience to his Father's will as an OBEDIENT SON, to the
only Potentate,
Elohim, his very teacher.

John 8:28
Then said Yah'ushua unto them, When ye have lifted up
(exalted) the Son of man, then shall ye know that I am (he*), and that
I do nothing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me I speak these
things.

KJV adds "he" here. It is not there! So it should read :
"then shall you know that
I exist (ego eimi) and do nothing
of myself"

Thus
his very existence is
due to the Father since
he is
begotten (created) by Him and taught by Him. Anything that
elevates the Son to a place above his teacher, ie. to a
To'rahless Messiah, is an abomination and falsehood from Satan. This is
the Marcion spirit which replaces Elohim as an apparently evil "god"
with a benevolent, ecumenical, universal (catholic), To'rahless J(Zeus)
Jesus. Pagan "deities"
(really demons) have always been scripted this way. Such myths and
legends are meant to teach the
art and idea of revolting, usurping and competing for worship. Sound
familiar? The real battle is with Satan,
the leader of such demons. These real demons are merely represented by
these
fictional pagan images called "deities". Modern versions of these
fictional "sky deities"are Superman, Batman etc all representing demons
/Satan. Satan really does want you to join
him and his demons in his attempted revolt against Yahuah's To'rah.
Satan wants all the worship. The trinity is one
of his strongest "divinely deified" demonic delusions that deceives the
whole world and by which he can try to win over your worship to him, as
that has been his goal since the garden of Eden.

The trinity
doctrine and its liars have done much to create division and confusion
in the minds of
many lost souls. We trust that the word (scriptures) of Yahuah would
truly revive
and reform you as you study with us in exposing this
damnable heresy.

Trinity 3 in
one - More Perverse Than Even The Demons

James
2:19 You believe that Elohim (pw God) is one; you do well. Even the
demons believe—and shudder!

Even the demons know Elohim is
not three so how perverse is the trinity doctrine ???

WHY THE "JESUS IS GOD" DOCTRINE
IS A LIE -
BECAUSE ELOHIM SAID SO

Jesus being God in the flesh, Jesus being God incarnate, Jesus
being the very God himself are all lies and contradictions to the truth
of what Yah'uah
Elohim has declared himself.
Let Yah be true and all men found to be liars who state otherwise.

Numbers 23:19
God is not
a man, that he should lie;neither
the
*son of man,
that he should repent...

(* "Son of man" - see
Ten Obvious Facts, point 1 below)

Trinitarians being joined at the hip to the Roman Catholic
Church oppose Yah'uah and state their lying doctrines that:
"Jesus is God"
"Jesus is God in the flesh"
Jesus is God incarnate"
"Jesus is the very God"... etc

These they mainly base upon the corrupted, and out of context, phrase
from
1 Timothy 3:16 in the KJV
"...God was manifest in the flesh..."
We expose the horrendous corruption of 1 Timothy
3:16
by the wicked translators of the Babylonian religion of Christianity
(click here to go there now).

IF YOU BELIEVE THE WORDS
OF ELOHIM (pw GOD) AND WHAT HE SAYS HERE IN NUMBERS 23:19
THEN YOU WILL NOT NEED TO GO ANY FURTHER THAN THIS.
YOU WOULD ALREADY REALISE THAT ANYTHING ELSE IS A CORRUPTION AND
CONTRADICTION. YAH'UAH
(pw GOD) DOES NOT CONTRADICT HIMSELF.

BUT IF YOU ARE STILL STIFF-NECKED AND BELIEVE LYING MEN
AND STILL THINK ELOHIM IS A LIAR
THEN THE REST OF THIS ARTICLE WILL HAVE TO BE PLODDED THROUGH

OBVIOUS FACTS

1- The Scriptures Refute "Jesus is
God" by Declaring Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) as the "Son of Man"

According to Matthew
1:1, Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) is the SON OF ELOHIM, the SON OF
DAVID, SON OF
ABRAHAM. He is a man, but most importantly he is the SON OF MAN. Every
time this term is mentioned referring to Yah'ushua we
remember
that Elohim (pw
God) has already categorically stated that the Son of Man is
NOT
Elohim according to Numbers 23:19 as above.

In the (REC) Renewed Everlasting
Covenant (pw New Testament) it is said 89 times!

Mat_8:20
(KJV) And Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) saith unto him, The foxes have
holes, and the birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man
hath not where to lay his head.
Mat_9:6 (KJV) But that ye may know that the Son of man
hath power on earth to forgive sins, (then saith he to the sick of the
palsy,) Arise, take up thy bed, and go unto thine house.
Mat_10:23
(KJV) But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into
another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the
cities of Israel, till the Son
of man be come.
Mat_11:19 (KJV) The Son of man
came eating and drinking, and they say, Behold a man gluttonous, and a
winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners. But wisdom is justified
of her children.
Mat_12:8 (KJV) For the Son of man
is Master (pw Lord) even of the sabbath day.
Mat_12:32 (KJV) And whosoever speaketh a word
against the Son
of man,
it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy
Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in
the world to come.
Mat_12:40 (KJV) For as Jonas was three days and
three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man
be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.
Mat_13:37 (KJV) He answered and said unto them, He
that soweth the good seed is the Son of man;
Mat_13:41 (KJV) The Son of man
shall send forth his malakhim (pw angels) , and they shall gather out
of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;
Mat_16:13
(KJV) When Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) came into the coasts of
Caesarea Philippi, he
asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man
am?
Mat_16:27 (KJV) For the Son of man
shall come in the honour (pw glory) of his Father with his malakhim (pw
angels) ; and then he shall reward every man according to his works.
Mat_16:28
(KJV) Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here,
which
shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man
coming in his kingdom.
Mat_17:9
(KJV) And as they came down from the mountain, Yah'ushua (pw
Jesus) charged
them, saying, Tell the vision to no man, until the Son of man
be risen again from the dead.
Mat_17:12
(KJV) But I say unto you, That Elias is come already, and
they
knew him not, but have done unto him whatsoever they listed. Likewise
shall also the Son
of man suffer of them.
Mat_17:22 (KJV) And while they abode in Galilee,
Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) said unto them, The Son of man
shall be betrayed into the hands of men:
Mat_18:11 (KJV) For the Son of man
is come to save that which was lost.
Mat_19:28
(KJV) And Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) said unto them, Verily I say
unto you, That ye
which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man
shall sit in the throne of his honour (pw glory), ye also shall sit
upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.
Mat_20:18 (KJV) Behold, we go up to Jerusalem; and
the Son of man
shall be betrayed unto the chief priests and unto the scribes, and they
shall condemn him to death,
Mat_20:28 (KJV) Even as the Son of man
came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a
ransom for many.
Mat_24:27
(KJV) For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and
shineth
even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man
be.
Mat_24:30 (KJV) And then shall appear the sign of
the Son of man
in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they
shall see the Son
of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great
honour (pw glory).
Mat_24:37 (KJV) But as the days of Noe were, so
shall also the coming of the Son of man
be.
Mat_24:39 (KJV) And knew not until the flood came,
and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man
be.
Mat_24:44 (KJV) Therefore be ye also ready: for in
such an hour as ye think not the Son of man
cometh.
Mat_25:13 (KJV) Watch therefore, for ye know
neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man
cometh.
Mat_25:31 (KJV) When the Son of man
shall come in his honour (pw glory), and all the holy malakhim (pw
angels) with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his
honour
(pw glory):
Mat_26:2 (KJV) Ye know that after two days is the
feast of the passover, and the Son of man
is betrayed to be crucified.
Mat_26:24 (KJV) The Son of man
goeth as it is written of him: but woe unto that man by whom the Son of man
is betrayed! it had been good for that man if he had not been born.
Mat_26:45
(KJV) Then cometh he to his disciples, and saith unto them,
Sleep
on now, and take your rest: behold, the hour is at hand, and the Son of man
is betrayed into the hands of sinners.
Mat_26:64
(KJV) Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) saith unto him, Thou hast said:
nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man
sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.
Mar_2:10 (KJV) But that ye may know that the Son of man
hath power on earth to forgive sins, (he saith to the sick of the
palsy,)
Mar_2:28 (KJV) Therefore the Son of man
is Master (pw Lord) also of the sabbath.
Mar_8:31 (KJV) And he began to teach them, that the
Son of man
must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders, and of the
chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise
again.
Mar_8:38 (KJV) Whosoever therefore shall be
ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation;
of him also shall the Son
of man be ashamed, when he cometh in the honour (pw glory)
of his Father with the holy malakhim (pw angels) .
Mar_9:9
(KJV) And as they came down from the mountain, he charged
them
that they should tell no man what things they had seen, till the Son of man
were risen from the dead.
Mar_9:12
(KJV) And he answered and told them, Elias verily cometh
first,
and restoreth all things; and how it is written of the Son of man,
that he must suffer many things, and be set at nought.
Mar_9:31 (KJV) For he taught his disciples, and
said unto them, The Son
of man is delivered into the hands of men, and they shall
kill him; and after that he is killed, he shall rise the third day.
Mar_10:33 (KJV) Saying, Behold, we go up to
Jerusalem; and the Son
of man
shall be delivered unto the chief priests, and unto the scribes; and
they shall condemn him to death, and shall deliver him to the Gentiles:
Mar_10:45 (KJV) For even the Son of man
came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a
ransom for many.
Mar_13:26 (KJV) And then shall they see the Son of man
coming in the clouds with great power and honour (pw glory).
Mar_13:34 (KJV) For the Son of man
is as a man taking a far journey, who left his house, and gave
authority to his servants, and to every man his work, and commanded the
porter to watch.
Mar_14:21 (KJV) The Son of man
indeed goeth, as it is written of him: but woe to that man by whom the Son of man
is betrayed! good were it for that man if he had never been born.
Mar_14:41
(KJV) And he cometh the third time, and saith unto them,
Sleep on
now, and take your rest: it is enough, the hour is come; behold, the Son of man
is betrayed into the hands of sinners.
Mar_14:62 (KJV) And Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) said, I
am: and ye shall see the Son
of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in
the clouds of heaven.
Luk_5:24 (KJV) But that ye may know that the Son of man
hath power upon earth to forgive sins, (he said unto the sick of the
palsy,) I say unto thee, Arise, and take up thy couch, and go into
thine house.
Luk_6:5 (KJV) And he said unto them, That the Son of man
is Master (pw Lord) also of the sabbath.
Luk_6:22
(KJV) baruch'd (pw blessed) are ye, when men shall hate you,
and when they
shall separate you from their company, and shall reproach you, and cast
out your name as evil, for the Son of man's
sake.
Luk_7:34 (KJV) The Son of man
is come eating and drinking; and ye say, Behold a gluttonous man, and a
winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners!
Luk_9:22 (KJV) Saying, The Son of man
must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders and chief
priests and scribes, and be slain, and be raised the third day.
Luk_9:26 (KJV) For whosoever shall be ashamed of me
and of my words, of him shall the Son of man
be ashamed, when he shall come in his own honour (pw glory), and in his
Father's, and of the holy malakhim (pw angels) .
Luk_9:44 (KJV) Let these sayings sink down into
your ears: for the Son
of man shall be delivered into the hands of men.
Luk_9:56 (KJV) For the Son of man
is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them. And they went to
another village.
Luk_9:58 (KJV) And Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) said unto
him, Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man
hath not where to lay his head.
Luk_11:30 (KJV) For as Jonas was a sign unto the
Ninevites, so shall also the Son of man
be to this generation.
Luk_12:8 (KJV) Also I say unto you, Whosoever shall
confess me before men, him shall the Son of man
also confess before the malakhim (pw angels) of Elohim (pw
God):
Luk_12:10 (KJV) And whosoever shall speak a word
against the Son
of man, it shall be forgiven him: but unto him that
blasphemeth against the Holy Ghost it shall not be forgiven.
Luk_12:40 (KJV) Be ye therefore ready also: for the
Son of man
cometh at an hour when ye think not.
Luk_17:22
(KJV) And he said unto the disciples, The days will come,
when ye
shall desire to see one of the days of the Son of man,
and ye shall not see it.
Luk_17:24
(KJV) For as the lightning, that lighteneth out of the one
part
under heaven, shineth unto the other part under heaven; so shall also
the Son of man
be in his day.
Luk_17:26 (KJV) And as it was in the days of Noe,
so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man.
Luk_17:30 (KJV) Even thus shall it be in the day
when the Son of
man is revealed.
Luk_18:8 (KJV) I tell you that he will avenge them
speedily. Nevertheless when the Son of man
cometh, shall he find faith on the earth?
Luk_18:31
(KJV) Then he took unto him the twelve, and said unto them,
Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things that are written by the
prophets concerning the Son
of man shall be accomplished.
Luk_19:10 (KJV) For the Son of man
is come to seek and to save that which was lost.
Luk_21:27 (KJV) And then shall they see the Son of man
coming in a cloud with power and great honour (pw glory).
Luk_21:36
(KJV) Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be
accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass,
and to stand before the Son
of man.
Luk_22:22 (KJV) And truly the Son of man
goeth, as it was determined: but woe unto that man by whom he is
betrayed!
Luk_22:48 (KJV) But Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) said unto
him, Judas, betrayest thou the Son of man
with a kiss?
Luk_22:69 (KJV) Hereafter shall the Son of man
sit on the right hand of the power of Elohim (pw God).
Luk_24:7 (KJV) Saying, The Son of man
must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and
the third day rise again.
Joh_1:51
(KJV) And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you,
Hereafter ye shall see heaven open, and the malakhim (pw
angels) of Elohim (pw God) ascending and
descending upon the Son
of man.
Joh_3:13 (KJV) And no man hath ascended up to
heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man
which is in heaven.
Joh_3:14 (KJV) And as Moses lifted up the serpent
in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man
be lifted up:
Joh_5:27 (KJV) And hath given him authority to
execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man.
Joh_6:27
(KJV) Labour not for the meat which perisheth, but for that
meat
which endureth unto everlasting life, which the Son of man
shall give unto you: for him hath Elohim (pw God) the Father sealed.
Joh_6:53
(KJV) Then Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) said unto them, Verily,
verily, I
say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man,
and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.
Joh_6:62 (KJV) What and if ye shall see the Son of man
ascend up where he was before?
Joh_8:28 (KJV) Then said Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) unto
them, When ye have lifted up the Son of man,
then shall ye know that I am he, and that I do nothing of myself; but
as my Father hath taught me, I speak these things.
Joh_12:23 (KJV) And Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) answered
them, saying, The hour is come, that the Son of man
should be glorified.
Joh_12:34
(KJV) The people answered him, We have heard out of the law
that
Messiah (pw Christ) abideth for ever: and how sayest thou, The Son of man
must be lifted up? who is this Son of man?
Joh_13:31 (KJV) Therefore, when he was gone out,
Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) said, Now is the Son of man
glorified, and Elohim (pw God) is glorified in him.
Act_7:56 (KJV) And said, Behold, I see the heavens
opened, and the Son
of man standing on the right hand of Elohim (pw God).
Heb_2:6 (KJV) But one in a certain place testified,
saying, What is man, that thou art mindful of him? or the son of man,
that thou visitest him?
Rev_1:13 (KJV) And in the midst of the seven
candlesticks one like unto the Son of man,
clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a
golden girdle.
Rev_14:14 (KJV) And I looked, and behold a white
cloud, and upon the cloud one sat like unto the Son of man,
having on his head a golden crown, and in his hand a sharp sickle.

2-
Yahuah is Spirit, Yah'ushua Came in the Flesh as the Son of Man - if
you don't get that then
there is no further help for you.

But Yah'ushua is the Son OF man and
the
Son OF
Elohim (pw God). Anything more than that is a lie, period!

2
John 1: 7 For many deceivers are
entered into the world, who confess not that Messiah Yah'ushua (pw
Jesus
Christ) is come in
the flesh. This is a deceiver and an opponent of Messiah( pw
antichrist).

1 John 4:2
Hereby know ye the Spirit
of Elohim (pw God): Every spirit
that confesseth that Messiah
Yah'ushua
(Jesus Christ) is come in the
flesh is of
Elohim (pw God): 3 And every spirit that confesseth not
that Messiah
Yah'ushua (pw Jesus Christ) is come in
the flesh is not
of Elohim (pw God): and this is that spirit of
an opponent of Messiah (pw antichrist), whereof ye have
heard that it
should come; and even now
already is it in the world.

Is
it not strange how the brainwashing by the catholic church has
been controlling people to confess the very opposite, that
Messiah is
not flesh but Elohim (God) himself, and that to deny this is heresy and
the unpardonable sin? This is the "success" of the trinity deception
which deceives the world and puts them in fear of men rather than
Elohim and fear of excommunication from men's "church" (circus) system
or persecution.
Did not the Pharisees also fear what men said rather than what Messiah
and his Father said?

3-The Very First and Greatest Command Says There is ONE Not Three, and NO
Other!

Mark12:
28
And one of the scribes came, and having heard them reasoning together,
and perceiving that he [Yah'ushua] had answered them well, asked him,
Which is the first commandment of all?
29 And Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) answered him, The first of all the
commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The
master(pw Lord)Yah'uah(pw the
LORD) our Elohim(pw
God)is one master(pw Lord)Yah'uah(pw the LORD):
30
And thou shalt love the master (pw Lord) Yah'uah (pw the LORD) thy
Elohim (pw God) with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all
thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the
first commandment.
31
And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as
thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.
32 And the scribe said unto him, Well, Master, thou hast said the
truth: for there is one Elohim (pw God);and there
is none other but he:

Shaul
confirms that there is one Elohim and Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) his Son
is separate to the One Elohim. Yah'ushua, referred to as the
mediator
who is between man and the One Elohim - he is excluded from the One and
only Elohim.

1 Tim 2:5 For there is one Elohim (pw God), AND there is one
mediator
between Elohim and men, the man Yah'ushua the Messiah (pw Christ Jesus)

The
scribe confirms that there is none other than Elohim, there is no "god
the son"
and
"god the spirit"! The scribe does not say yes and you are that
one! No! He says there is none other but HE, Elohim, who is so
to
be worshipped. This
is straight from the shema (to hear) the beginning and foundation of
Yah'uah's commands ie to properly hear his commands you have to first
and foremost understand He is ONE not three.

5 And thou shalt
love the master (pw Lord) Yah'uah (pw the LORD) thy Elohim (pw God)
with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might.

6 And these words,
which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heart:

7 And thou shalt
teach them diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when
thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and
when thou liest down, and when thou risest up.

4- Elohim (pw God) Cannot Be Born.

Isaiah
43:10 "Ye
are my witnesses, saith Yahuah (pw LORD), and my servant whom I have
chosen:
that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me
there was no Elohim (pw God) formed, neither shall there be after me."

5- Yah'ushua (pw Jesus)
Never Says, “I am Elohim (pw God)”.

On the
contrary Yah'ushua explicitly states that he is not
"Elohim (pw God)" being totally reliant upon His Father's will and not
his own.

John 5:19Then
answered Yah'ushua and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say
unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the
Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son
likewise. 30 I
can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is
just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father
which hath sent me."

6- Elohim (pw God) Cannot Be Seen.

John 1:18 No
man hath seen Elohim (pw GOD) at
any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the
bosom of the Father, he hath declared
him.

Once again a clear and distinct
difference. Messiah has been his witness, his declaration, proclamation
but never
his dupleganger /imposter of Yahuah himself. He is the Son - period! ."
Bosom"
figuratively means a bay, this means he was figuratively hidden within
the bay, as a ship would be,
and then brought forth to be revealed / "declared" not as the Father
but
as the Son.
The ship is revealed from the bay, the
ship can never ever be the bay itself!

7- Apostle Shaul (Paul)
Never Taught a Three-headed "Godhead"

(Figures
Left and Right : Various pagan depictions of the Trinity invention seen
in catholic churches which match (figure below) the evil Masonic All
seeing Eye.)
For
a Trinity to exist, three "gods" have to exist Three
sovereigns,
but Yah'ushua made it clear that Yah'uah his Father has already
emphatically said there is only ONE Elohim (see point 2 above).
Yah'ushua the Son only
teaches what his Father teaches not what the catholic church (universal
circus) teaches.

If
the Trinity
were such an
important
heresy to be made truth then Shaul (Paul) would have taught it. He does
not
mention any trinity, he does not
refer to a three-headed Godhead. In fact, Godhead is only mentioned in
the Renewed Everlasting Covenant (pw "New testament") scriptures three
times and only by Apostle Shaul (Paul).
When he does refer
to it he
does not use it to create or support a trinitarian doctrine.
In
fact, it, instead, weakens the idea of three-in-one. Not in any single
description by Paul describing the so-called Godhead do we see the
pagan
formula included at the same time. There is no so-called
"god
the father, god
the son and god
the holy spirit" formula ever mentioned. Instead this difficult and
curious
word
Godhead is mentioned referring to a separate entity, the
Father, the potentate who
is the origin of creation, men and Messiah.

1) Acts 17:29
Forasmuch
then as we
are the offspring of Elohim (pw God), we ought not to
think that the Godhead
is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man’s device.

Here we see that Paul (Shaul) refers to
men as
offspring of Elohim. Elohim the Father creates, it is not man who
creates the
Father. The man Yah'ushua, the Son, therefore also cannot create or
re-fashion the Father like some idol into his own liking.
Yah'ushua is equally an offspring of Elohim but differs by
being the first
begotten Son of Elohim, firstborn of the spirit and not flesh. It means
that the "Godhead" brings forth many offspring, Elohim the Father being
their origin. No "god the father, god the son, god the holy
spirit"
heresy is mentioned here by Shaul. Instead,
Elohim the Father is said
to be the supreme creator of men, and it follows that so is
Yahushua begotten as the
first begotten Son of Yahuah in the flesh. As our section on
the
history of the trinity will show, it was the pagan invention of a
"baptism" formula thatIrenaeus first used to begin crafting the trinity
heresy. (for more on this see the Subversive Immersion Formula)

2) Romans 1:20
For the invisible
things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being
understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and
Godhead;
so that they are without excuse

Again the "Godhead" here is made known
to
all men and they have no excuse. The "Godhead" clearly
excludes
the Son. Shaul is clearly showing that the "Godhead"
is revealed by the things which the Godhead himself (Elohim Supreme)
has created. If it were so obvious that the "Godhead" must include the
Son
thenShaul
would not have excluded him in the equation. So the Godhead
could be clearly known even without any knowledge of the Son then
invisible. This is
obviously how
it was for most who obeyed the Father before getting knowledge of the
Son or
of His appearing. They
did not need to acknowledge a "trinity" to be acceptable before Yahuah.
No such command existed or should exist, except in the pagan
Catholic church for its followers. But now that the "Godhead's"
ultimate
creation, his Son, who was hidden in the bay, has been revealed and has
appeared,
it is now only necessary to acknowledge the Son as just that, the
Son of the living Elohim. There is no excuse, since his ultimate
creation, that which he loves and is pleased with, his Son, has been
shown to us. He has been shown to understand his own
Creator who he calls Father, POINTING to
the Godhead as Father. There is no excuse! No trinity can destroy the
ultimate creation of the Son of Yahuah worshipping his Creator by full
obedience and love, even to the point of laying down his
life. 3) continues
with this idea.

3)
Colossians
2:9 For in him
(Messiah) dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

Once
again this
demonstrates that although the Son had been created it was only until
he was manifested in the flesh that the full revelation of the
"Godhead",
Elohim the Father could be fully understood by man on earth, since a
Father
can only be a Father if he has a Son who obeys him and shares his love
with us. And thus, the Godhead, The Father, becomes our Father through
the
acknowledgement of his Son and NOT through some vain idea that the Son
is the Father himself. The Son bears all the fullness of His Father's
spiritual character and traits, he is truly one of his SPIRITUAL
kindred
by his
MORAL CHARACTER
inherited.

We will
ellaborate more later regarding this odd pagan translation
"Godhead" itself.

Acts 10:41"...who did eat and drink with him after he rose from the
dead"

9- Yah'ushua is Not Omniscient (all
knowing) Like His Father YHUH (also see point 14)

(1 John 3:20) and Mark
13:32 "But of that day
and that hour
knoweth no man, no, not the malakhim (pw angels) which are in
shamayim (pw heaven), neither the
Son, but the Father."

Heb 5:8
Though he were a Son, yet
learned he obedience by the things which he
suffered;

Only
Yahuah
is all knowing there is nothing for him to learn. This is not the case
with Yahushua. How does one learn
obedience without being sinful? Simply by learning the commands of the
Father and choosing to follow them from the outset. This is what Eve
was supposed to continue to do after being created in perfection but
did not. Where she failed the Son of Yahuah, Yah'ushua did
not. Once one knows all things one cannot afterwards be unaware of
anything, unless one's mind has been affected. To say that Yah'ushua
lost his memory somehow would mean he were not of sound mind which is
ridiculous.

Messiah temporarlily lowered himself below the malakhim (pw angels)
when on earth.

Thus
he had to learn and understand obedience and submission to
Elohim.
Now, if he were Elohim there would be nothing to learn since
Elohim is all-knowing (omniscient).

Messiah had to

learn obedience, submission

be perfected (made fully mature in character)

be purified by
the Father's word to remain sinless in the
world

Yahuah is already perfect in every way, does not change, but rather
is the source or
Father of purification, perfection, and teaching. He is kodesh (morally
set apart), He cannot even enter this sinful world - His mere presence
would destroy this dark sinful world because of His pure light.

1)Hebrews 5:8
Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he
suffered;

2)Heb 5:9 And being made perfect, he became a causer* of
eternal
salvation unto all them that obey him;

3)
John 17:16 They are not of the world, even as I am not of the
world. 17 Purify (pw -sanctify) them through thy
truth: thy word is truth. 18 As thou hast sent me
into the
world, even so have I also sent them into the
world. 19 And
for their sakes I purify (pw sanctify) myself, that they also might be
purified (pw sanctified) through the truth

In 2) above KJV
renders *"the author" rather than "causer" here due to trinitarian bias
to make Messiah
appear to be the author or source of eternal life when he is, in fact,
the Father's way or instrument of salvation (the way, instrument to
the
Father). The Greek here is 159 aitios ah'-ee-tee-os from the same as
154; causative,
i.e. (concretely) a causer:--author.
Messiah has already destroyed the notion that he is the source / author
and rather the causer when he said "I do nothing of myself; but as my
Father hath
taught me,
I speak these things." (John 8:28) This
false use of author implies also that Messiah would have authored a new
law and done away with To'rah which he did not. Messiah is not even a
co-author
of To'rah but a doer of it.
Note in 1) though he were a Son
yet learned he obedience. We see that the obvious becomes clear, if
Messiah were Elohim (pw God) then here would have been the
perfect time to
say: though he were Elohim
(pw God)
yet learned he obedience ( an obvious oxymoron). This is after all
the folly of the trinity "godspell" that the omniscient Elohim somehow
became an amnesiac. However Paul does not even hint at such
absurdity. Paul is not a trinitarian. Instead he makes it clear that
the Son of
Yahuah
was
not excluded from learning to submit as he was truly a Son and his
Father was truly a Father. I will now show you how the trinitarian bias
again from the translators of the KJV twists the verse and you will see
how the truth and proper logical sense of the sentence is revealed
when the correct words are applied.

1)Hebrews 5:8
Though* [2539]
he were a Son, yet*
[2539] learned he obedience by the things which he
suffered; KJV

Let's
look at the Greek shall we: "though" and "yet" are in the Greek the same
word but since they have various meanings there is latitude in choosing
which to use by context. If the context is trinitarian bias then
obviously the translation would be in that direction. Lets look

*StrongsGreek
2539 kaiper kah'-ee-per from 2532 and 4007; and
indeed, i.e. nevertheless or notwithstanding:--and yet,
although. see GREEK for 2532 see GREEK for 4007

So let's use the first meaning listed "and indeed" and insert them

Heb 5:8 And
indeed he were a Son, and indeed learned he obedience by the things
which he
suffered;

Now
does this not make more sense. Obviously if he indeed were a Son then
he would indeed obey his Father according to To'rah. According
to
To'rah a son is defined as a son by his very obedience to his Father,
else he is no more.

Lev
20:9 For every
one that despises(curses) his father or his mother shall be surely put
to death:

Furthermore if Yahuah is no respector of persons then His own son
should not receive special treatment either. However, this is the tone
we get with the KJV, that even though he were a son he had to learn
obedience. In other words, my gosh, how strange it is for them that the
Son of Elohim
himself should also have to learn obedience, how dare He have to go
through such a thing, especially if you claim he is
"Elohim (pw God)" himself, how strange indeed. This stupidity in
translation would
further lead to the imaginings of a son of royalty expecting to get red
carpet treatment on earth only to be tricked by his Father to face the
"evil Jews" and then this Jesus saying, oh dear, why
are you forsaking me
Father, what's happening? Of course this is all fiction. Yah'ushua knew
exactly (John 10:17) what was in store as a son and laid down His own
life for all evil done by every sinner on earth, not only for the Jews.
The
ultimate
obedience was that he must obey his Father to the end in taking the
punishment for our sins whilst innocent, with the promise of
resurrection. Such obedience and trust by a son to a Father is rare,
thus it should read "AND INDEED he
were a Son"
to the fullest degree in obedience, submission and trust. If we use the
translation "though he were a son" it implies that he was Elohim (pw
God) and for a
while he became a son, grinning and bearing obedience/submisison to
himself or if not to himself then who or what? The Jews? The Romans?
Of course not! There is no such charade! Digging deeper into
the
verse the only charade is the translation itself. Now, again, with the
corrections (and indeed) lets look further:

Hebrews 5:8 And indeed
he were*[5607]
a Son, and
indeed learned he obedience by the things which he
suffered;

*Strong's Greek
5607
on oan, including the feminine ousa oo'-sah; and the neuter on on
present participle of 1510; being:--be, come, have. see GREEK for 1510

Thus the translation charade is further exposed and should be:

Hebrews
5:8 And indeed he being
a Son, and indeed learned he obedience by the things which he
suffered;

Now
Shaul is making it clear that Yah'ushua the Messiah is emphatically
STILL INDEED a SON, not past tense Son. He has not been elevated to
"Elohim (pw God)" by some pretense
of suffering. He is INDEED STILL OBEYING his FATHER. He is not THE
FATHER.
So now the false translation suggests the idea of a new god
usurping Elohim and this idea would be further strengthened with the
false
use of the word, author, as explained in 2) above, where the "new god"
has
authored a new religion which they call Christianos (Christianity - all
about a new syncretic god and nothing about pure To'rah). (For more see
Do You Really Want To Be Called a Christian?"

However, the truth is that The
Father INDEED will send His Son INDEED again to resurrect His righteous
and destroy
the wicked. If He were no longer an obedient Son what surety is there
that justice will be done as prophesied? Perhaps the mind of
the
ecumencial translator can be heard here by these twisted translations.
What if this son were that pagan (J)Zeus, the one that does away with
To'rah? Perhaps he will resurrect all those sinning pagan catholics and
christians who
love the sins of other idolaters, perhaps he is the benevolent one who
will usurp his Father, throw out that dreaded righteous To'rah which
condemns them, and feel sorry for those unrepentant wicked ones. No!
Not so. The SON has been appointed as the righteous obedient judge of
the
Father, he is not a pagan (J)Zeus god born on 25 December like all the
others from the pagan pantheon parade. No, he is the Son Yah'ushua,
Son of the Living righteous Elohim who will destroy the wicked
according to his To'rah.

In
today's society the erroneous
translation "though he were a son, yet learned he obedience" would be
quite acceptable to understand since the perverse fathers of today
think sonship means spoiling / corrupting the son by
encouraging materialism
and worldly success (eg. a career which ignores the seventh day
sabbath,
dishonest dealings etc). Sonship for them is not defined by obedience
to To'rah and bringing a son up in the ways of Yahuah. They would think
it strange that a son should be punished, as correctly instructed in
To'rah, so that he learns
the ways of Yahuah and does not lose his soul. At the same
time,
however, they might, if they are "christian", accept the innocent Son
Yahushuah to stand in their place and be punished by the Father for
their
own sins, and yet they are content in despising the same Messiah and
his
atonement by continuing to sin and raising sons who in turn sin
(transgress the Father's To'rah). They will accept a (J)Zeus god who
they think will
universally (catholically) accept both goats (wicked) and sheep
(righteous) into shamayim (pw heaven). They despise the Son of
Elohim, they despise the Father Elohim most of all.

Heb
12:8 My son, despise not thou the chastening of Yahuah nor faint when
thou art rebuked of him:6 For whom Yahuah loveth he chasteneth, and
scourgeth every son whom he receiveth.7 If ye endure chastening, Elohim
dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father
chasteneth not? 8 But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are
partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.

Prov 3:11 My son, despise not the chastening of Yahuah;
neither be weary of his correction: 12 For whom Yahuah loveth he
correcteth; even as a father the son in whom he delighteth.

It does
not mean
Messiah is of the same substance, ie, is sovereign, he is not
above the
To'rah (law) of his Father but is a submissive, obedient Son.

Luke 2:52 And
Yah'ushua increased in wisdom and stature and in favour with Elohim
and man.

Yah'ushua's wisdom had to develop and the source of that wisdom was
from
the already fully wise Yah'uah Elohim his Father who is perfect
(complete in wisdom). He received the
fulness of wisdom from the Father but that fullness could only be fully
applied when it is fully understood and that is what Yah'ushua was
perfected in at an early age.

11-Yah'ushua is Not Omnipresent.

Yah'ushua however now sits on the right-hand side of Elohim on the
throne

1 Peter 3:22 "Who
is gone into shamayim (pw heaven), and is on the right hand of
Elohim ; malakhim (pw angels) and
authorities and powers being made subject unto him."

He
does not reside in every man but only through the spirit in the hearts
of those who obey and acknowledge him as the Son of Yahuah. The Son has
left us till he returns but is with true believers in spirit, in a way
that is no different to Paul's
own non-omnipresent description as a man on earth.

Col
2:5 For though I be absent in the flesh, yet am I with you in the
spirit.

The
spirit is the knowledge, acknowledgement, thoughts, prayers, mindset,
will, wisdom of Yahuah- the spirit is NOT a
person
(although it is personified just as wisdom is elsewhere in scripture.
Wisdom is personified as female while ruach hakodesh, pure
spirit of
Yahuah, is personified as male) The spirit is also not a dove
but was described in this way merely because of the manner in which it
descended LIKE
a dove.

Yah'ushua had to be fully
present in the flesh to die on the torture stake (pw cross,
crucifixion) - He had emunah (pw faith)
that Elohim would raise him up. He
did NOT
raise himself as he was dead, D-E-A-D. Anyone
who
declares otherwise is denying that the Son came in the flesh ( ie. was
mortal) - this is the anti Messiah spirit that alludes to immortality
of
flesh.

Acts 4:10 "Be
it known unto you all, and to all
the people of Israel, that by the name of Yah'ushua Messiah (pw Jesus
Christ) of Nazareth,
whom ye impaled on the stake (pw crucified), whom Elohim (pw God)
raised from the
dead,even by him doth
this man stand here before you whole."

Yah'ushua does not possess
self-existence in the flesh since He was begotten. How
strange it
would be if Elohim is both the Father and Son simultaneously, as at,
for
example, Yah'ushua's immersion (pw baptism) and at the
transfiguration. Is Elohim playing
different roles as in a pantomime? If Yah'ushua is Elohim he must then
be a ventriloquist saying He is pleased with Himself? No, Yahuah is not
an entertainer in the "church"/circus. Yahuah is not pretending or role
playing like some child. This is not a Hollywood production. This is
reality: Yahuah is the Almighty Father Elohim and he has a Son!!

Matthew 3:16 "And
Yah'ushua (pw Jesus), when he was immersed (pw baptized), went up
straightway out of
the water: and,
lo, the shamayim (pw heavens) were opened unto him, and he saw the
Spirit of Elohim (pw God)
descending like a dove, and lighting upon him: 17 And lo a
voice from shamayim (pw heaven), saying, This is my beloved Son, in
whom I am well
pleased."

Matthew
17: 4 "Then answered Peter, and
said
unto Yah'ushua (pw Jesus), Master (pw -Lord) , it is good
for us to be here: if thou wilt, let us
make here three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one
for Eliyahu (Elijah). 5 While he yet spake, behold, a bright
cloud
overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said,
This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye
him."

12- Yah'ushua is Not Omnipotent
(ALL powerful
and ALL sovereign)

Firstly
we see that the Son, the man in the flesh was weak in the flesh and had
to be strengthened. That which is all powerful is never weak and that
is Elohim (God) the Father alone who is not flesh or a man but spirit.

But now that Yah'ushua has been given
power it is finite as it will be handed over to His Father at
the end.

1 Cor 15:24 "Then
cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the rule and
reign (pw -kingdom) to Elohim (pw God),
indeed (*even)the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all
authority
and power. 25 For
he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.
26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is
death. 27 For
he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are
put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted which did put all
things under him. 28 And
when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also
himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that Elohim
(pw God) may
be all in all."

(KJV
has "even" the Father as though he is inclusive of others when it
should be rendered "indeed" ie exlcusivley the very Father alone. This
is confrimed by the use of "excepted" in verse 26 further conveying
exclusivity of the Father from the Son)

13- The
Father Cannot Be Sent.

If the Father Elohim was sent who sent him? Mary his Mother???? No!
This is a ridiculous catholic lie and perversion.

John
17:1 "These
words spake Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) , and lifted up his eyes to shamayim
(pw heaven), and said, Father,
the hour is come; *glorify thy Son, that
thy Son also may glorify thee:
2 As thou hast given him power over all flesh, that he should
give eternal life to as many as thou hast given
him. 3 And this is life eternal, that
they might know thee
the only
true Elohim (pw God),
andYah'ushua (pw
Jesus) Messiah (pw Christ),
whom thou hast sent.
4 I have
glorified thee on the
earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to
do. 5 And now, O Father, glorify thou me
with thine own self with the honour (pw glory) which I had with thee
before the
world was. 6 I have manifested thy name
unto the men which thou gavest me out of the world: thine they were,
and thou gavest them me; and they have kept thy
word. 7 Now they have known that all
things whatsoever thou hast given me are of thee.
8 For I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me;
and they have received them, and have known surely that
I came out from
thee, and they have believed that thou didst send
me. 9 I pray for them: I
pray not for the
world, but for them which thou hast given me; for they are
thine. 10 And all mine are thine, and
thine are mine; and I am glorified in them.
11 And now I am no more in the world, but these are in the
world, and I come to thee. Set
apart (pw Holy)
Father, keep through thine own name
[YHUH] those whom thou hast given me, that they may be one, as we
are. 12 While I was with them in the
world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept,
and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition; that the scripture
might be fulfilled. 13 And now come I to
thee; and these things I speak in the world, that they might have my
joy fulfilled in themselves. 14 I have
given them thy word; and the world hath hated them, because they are
not of the world, even as I am not of the world.
15 I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world,
but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil.
16 They are not of the world, even as I am not of the
world. 17 Purify (pw sanctify) them
through thy
truth: thy word is truth. 18 As thou hast
sent me into the world, even so have I also sent
them into the
world. 19 And for their
sakes I sanctify
myself, that they also might be sanctified through the
truth. 20 Neither pray I for these alone,
but for them also which shall believe on me through their
word; 21 That they all may be one; as
thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in
us: that the
world may believe that thou hast sent
me.
22 And the honour (pw glory) which thou gavest me I have
given them; that
they may be one, even as we are one:
23 I in
them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one;
and that the
world
may know that thou hast sent me,
and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me.
24 Father, I will that they also, whom thou hast given me, be
with me where I am; that they may behold my honour (pw glory), which
thou hast
given me: for thou
lovedst me before the foundation of the world.
25 O righteous Father, the world
hath not known thee: but I have known thee, and these have known
that
thou hast sent me.
26 And I have declared unto them thy name, and will declare
it: that the love wherewith thou hast loved me may be in them, and I in
them.

(* glorify
/ glory is a pagan word used by Catholics in the Latin Vulgate and
hence
KJV after the godess Gloria- a cleaner word would be splendour, honour,
exalt, etc. )

YHUH is the essence of the worship. He
is the object of worship and receives the splendour even as Yah'ushua's
purpose in receiving splendour from His Father is to ultimately give
splendour to the Father and, in fact, prove that he has been sent by the
Father. Over and over
again Yah'ushua makes it clear that the true believers are to
know that YHUH the Father has sent
the Son
and YHUH is to be
worshipped as in the Master Messiah's
Prayer*.
Yah'ushua's followers at that time (Apostles
and Disciples) never ever believed that the Father IS the
Son. Furthermore the term "I and the Father are one" is
clearly
explained as
perfection / completeness, and is not at all limited to any trinity
since the true believers are included in obtaining this same
oneness which is purely a oneness or aggreement in mind and spirit with
Yahuah's and Yah'ushua's will.

Yah'ushua obeys (continuous
tense) the
first commandment. He is not "Elohim (pw God)" . He does not
worship
himself!

Mat
4:8 Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and
sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the splendour of them; 9
And
saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall
down and worship me. 10 Then saith Yah'ushua unto him, Get thee hence,
Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship Yahuah thy Elohim (pagan
translation the Lord thy God), and him
only shalt thou serve.

Satan was tempting Yah'ushua to worship
him
instead of Yahuah His Elohim. He refused!! Notice, He did not
say, Satan, you are to worship me your Elohim, and notice, Satan
himself
did not confuse Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) the Son with Elohim (pw
God) either, now did he, else he would
not have attempted to tempt him as the Son in breaking the first
commandment! It is ironic that Satan himself knows who the Son is, one
who worships the Father, but still deceives men into thinking the Son
is somebody else and creates a false Jesus god who does break the first
commandment, making himself Elohim (pw God) and abolishing his To'rah (
including the
first commandment and the fourth and so it goes). Same temptation all
over again, only worse and on a bigger scale to the ignorant.

15-The Mind
of Elohim (pw God) the Father is Clearly Not the Same as the Son.

1
Cor 2:15 For who hath known the mind of Yahuah (pw the Lord),
that he may
instruct him? But we have the mind of Messiah (pw Christ).

The Father's mind instructs while the
Son's mind chooses to follow and obey his instruction. Hence we can be
like-minded as the Son but not all knowing as the Father. This ties in
with point 7 above referring to omnscience.

This
defines the meaning of the fullness of the nature of Elohim (pw
Godhead)
dwelling in Yah'ushua (Col 2:9). It was and is not Elohim himself
dwelling in a "Yah'ushua disguise", else he would also be all knowing
(omniscient)
see point 7.

16-Elohim (pw God) Did Not Come
Down to the Earth as a Man, Yah'ushua (pw Jesus)

In fact, we see the very opposite -
when
Yah'ushua
teaches us how to separate men's identity from Elohim (pw God)
the Father. He uses the evidence of Elohim (pw God) being in shamayim
(pw heaven) even while he
himself Yah'ushua (the Son) was down on earth. This clear, distinct and
distant
seperation between Yah'ushua and Yahuah could not be clearer by
the added mention of shamayim ( the heights) - third shamayim (pw
heaven)
where Yahuah dwells outside of our realm.

Matthew 23:9 And call no man your
father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in shamayim
(heaven).

Furthermore, Yah'ushua's statement
"your
Father which IS in shamayim (pw heaven)" appears eight more times in
the good message
(pagan translation-gospel) as
well as of course "OUR Father which IS in shamayim (pw
heaven)". Yes, the
Father's prayer which Yah'ushua taught us while on earth as the Son of
Elohim clearly reminds us again that the Father is His
Father too
by the use of "our" Father. The Son clearly separates
himself from the notion that Elohim (pw God) came down from "shamayim
(pw heaven)" as "Jesus".
Instead he utilises the present tense case of what is going on on earth
while he is presently here and where the Father is at the same time -
ie. in
shamayim (pw heaven) - period!

17-Elohim (pw God) Alone is Immortal, Unapproachable and
Invisible

1 Tim6: 14
That thou keep this commandment without spot, unrebukeable, until the
appearing of our Master Messiah Yah'ushua
15 Which in his times he shall shew, who is the baruch'd (pw blessed)
and only
Potentate (pw Godhead), the King of kings, and Master of
Masters( pw Lord of lords) 16 Who only hath immortality,
dwelling in the light which no man can approach
unto; whom no
man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power
everlasting. Amein (pw Amen)

Yah'ushua
died and was given
immortality by the only immortal Father
who
raised him. Likewise, we, who are righteous, will be given the same
immortality only by the power of the Father in
the future
at the one and only resurrection of the righteous. There is no such
thing as dying now and immediately entering shamayim (pw heaven), or
gehenna (pw hell) - this is only in the vain imaginings of
Catholic pagan immortality which bypasses death - this
is another heresy!!

1 Cor15: 53
For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put
on immortality.

This
will
only take place
at the resurrection when all the righteous dead are
raised together at
the last day before the millenium. After the 1000 years the wicked dead
are raised to life but only to be destroyed along with death itself.
Nobody
possesses immortality (save Messiah to whom it has been given by
the Father)and
thus repeated, unrepentant, wilful sin (eg. addicts, drunkards, unclean
foods,
sexually immoral: adulterers, fornicators(shacking up), multiple
partners.................. etc, etc ) in the body will cause
death
and loss of salvation, even after justification by
Messiah. (For more on losing one's salvation see Take the OSAS Challenge) Neither
is there purgatory where sins can be removed after death ( For more see
Puragatory Heresy ).

18-Ya'ushua The Son Made Like Us In Every Way, Not Elohim (pw
God).

Heb 2:16 For
verily he took not on him the nature of malakhim (pw angels); but he
took on him the seed of Abraham. 17
Wherefore in
all things it behoved (Greek -opheilo) him to be made like
unto his brethren, that he might be a compassionate (pw
merciful) and
trustworthy (morally steadfast) (pw faithful) high priest in things
pertaining to Elohim,
to make reconciliation (atonement) for the sins of the people. 18 For
in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour
them that are tempted.

From the above it is clear that it was "essential"
that Yah'ushua be made like us as the Updated KJV puts it. He was of
the seed of Abraham and He was made as we were in all things (Greek-
pas) made in every way the same with free will to succumb to temptation
or to resist it. He chose the
latter. If He were Elohim (pw God) Satan would not have wasted his time
trying to tempt Him, now would he? Yahuah Elohim cannot be tempted to
sin. Yah'ushua had to overcome Satan by not sinning. He chose
to
resist sin because He loves the Father. He thus became our perfect
atonement. Some have taught that Messiah was made righteous by nature
rather than choice. This suggests He was an automaton who could not
sin. This
is utterly false and a lie since we have already been told here in Heb
2:16 that He was made with our
nature, like us in every way with the same weaknesses, free will, etc.
Messiah was certainly born righteous (free of sin) just as Adam before
he sinned. When Messiah entered this sinful world He had to remain
righteous by learning to
remain obedient - Heb 5:8 as discussed in point 8 above. He had to
purify
himself (John 17:19) of this world's temptations by resisting them.
Adam did not
stay righteous, while Messiah, on the other hand, obviously did.
Messiah did
this
both by
choice and by nature since He chose to follow the nature
of His Father
just as we ought to.

*************

The
following chapter: History
of the Trinity,

contains some
text from a printed tract of a "church" sect.

In
some places we have left the pagan names and words as they are.

We
do not uphold to the teachings of so-called

"church
fathers","denominations" or the misleading term
"christianity"

We
merely use the historical references to show men's philosophy

through
history and how it opposes the true scriptures.

History
of the Trinity

During the 2nd and 3rd
centuries so-called church-fathers of Alexandria in Egypt Clement,
Irenaeus, Alexander, Origen, Arius, Athanasius and Cyril were causing
confusion over the so-called Divinity of the Messiah.
They
wanted to know whether He was fully Divine, or was He human?

Well,
it is important to note that this word “divine” itself is a pagan
idea in the first place.
Divine/Divinity,
Deity, Theos are all related words. The Greek words "dios"
and "Theos," and the Latin word "deus" all refer
to pagan gods: Greek "Dieus/Zeus, Teutonic-Germanic "Ziu,"
Roman "Diovis/Jovis/ Jupiter/Zeus were all names for Sun-god
deities that "shine, have brightness."
So
denying the trinity is said to deny the Deity or Divinity of Messiah.
Well, that would be a good start since Elohim (pw God) is not a pagan
god. He is not a
Deity or Divinity either.

It
is well known from the writings on the walls of the pyramids that the
Egyptians had many gods, and were familiar with worshipping various
trinities. A trinity is a group of three gods. For
example, they worshipped Amun, Maut and Khonso, another was Osiris,
Isis and Horus, and also Neph, Sate and
Amouke, to name a few of the
better known trinities. Different trinities were being
revered
in different cities, while worshippers exercised a peaceful
toleration toward those who revered any others. This same
tolerance or compromise was later shown with Constantine in Rome and
his establishment of the false religion called Christianity. It is
interesting to note, however, that in all these Egyptian trinities,
the third god of the trio always emanated from the first two as
though it were their offspring.

It was about AD 180 that Irenaeus proposed the
first exposition of a “Christian Trinity”. This whole
matter seems to have arisen from the baptism formula recorded in
Matthew 28:19 "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing
them in the name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy
Spirit". Irenaeus also taught that those Christians who
wished to be baptized must have a triple immersion in running
water.
This was intended to conform to the three elements, the Father, the
Son and the Holy Spirit. Two leading clergymen, Alexander and
Athanasius, quickly picked up on Irenaeus's theory of a
triune
god. They both believed that Elohim (pw God) and Jesus were
equal, and
they
started to teach the earliest concept of the Christian Trinity. They
started to preach that Jesus was fully “divine” and the same
substance with the Father. They used the Greek words Homo
Ousious (of the same substance) to describe the Father
and
the Son to make Irenaeus's idea more credible. So we assume that they
had made their god a sun god like so many pagan triune gods since
their obsession was with “divinity” and thus their Jesus was made
of the same substance ie a sun-god too.

In the meanwhile Arius,
a priest in Alexandria argued that Elohim (pw God) is spirit (John
4:24) a
non-material personal being, and his Son “Jesus” flesh and blood.
He used the term Heter Ousious (of a
different
substance). He said if Elohim (pw God) had created the Son,
the Son could
not be eternal with the Father. He argued that
“Jesus”
was created a superior Being to redeem the human race. He
reasoned that if the Father bore a Son, there must have been a time
when the Son did not exist, so the Son could not be eternal with the
Father. He therefore placed the Son in a position below that
of
the Father. Arius also taught that the Father and Son were
both
superior to the “Holy” Spirit, which was Elohim's (pw God)
power. He
was convinced that the Father must rank above the Son and the Son was
above the “Holy” Spirit. He said that Elohim (pw God) was the
creator,
and that the Son of Elohim (pw God) was an intermediate Being, above
all the rest
of creation.

As the contention raged on, Arius could not
alter the views of his opponents, so he called upon some of his
fellow clergymen at Constantinople and elsewhere for support, causing
the dispute to spread. The contention caused waves of strife
to
arise between bishops, the clergy and various “church” groups,
causing Alexandria to become divided over this issue. The
arguments continued unabated well into the 4th century, and by the
5th century these conflicts disrupted all commercial and industrial
activity in Alexandria.

In the meanwhile the Edict of
Milan in AD 313 brought an end to all persecution of those who
claimed to follow Jesus in the Roman Empire. Constantine the
Great then invented Christianity as the state religion, and
concerned
himself with the affairs of this early Christian Church which was
nothing like the doctrine of the apostles, Messiah or Yahuah.

This was simply a political manoeuvre
in order to
unify its false doctrines and thereby ensure unity within the Empire.
Constantine was greatly concerned over the quarrelling by the
“church” leaders with regards to the nature of Jesus. He
then took the initiative in AD 325, by convoking a Church Council in
Nicaea, in present day Turkey. The Meeting was commissioned
to
resolve the disagreement over the nature of Jesus and several other
disputes that were prevalent at that time. The main dispute
about the so-called “divinity” of Jesus was again based on some
ambiguous Renewed Everlasting Covenant (pw New Testament)
passages.

The meeting was very tempestuous as they debated
and finally adopted the heretic resolution that Yah'ushua (pw
Jesus) was indeed
fully divine and of the same substance as the Father. The
meeting then endorsed their decision by using the key words Homo
Ousious (of one substance) to describe the relationship
of Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) to Elohim (pw God) the
Father. From then onwards, Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) was
to be
known as "God the Son". The Holy Spirit was then
declared a God of equal standing with the Father and the Son.
The upshot of this meeting was that the Council had introduced a new
doctrine into their Christian Church known as the Trinity.
This
is the term used to express the belief that within the one God, there
are three “divine” persons - the Father, the Son and the Holy
Ghost (or Holy Spirit). The Meeting then formulated the
Nicene
Creed, which was to be recited in all “churches” to demonstrate
that Jesus was indeed "Very God".

At this time I cannot help but repeat
what I had, as you may recall, stated at the begining in point
10:

1
Cor 15:24 "Then cometh the end, when he
shall have
delivered up the rule and reign (pw -kingdom) to Elohim (pw
God),
indeed
(*even) the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and
all authority and power. 25 For
he (Yah'ushua)
must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.
26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is
death. 27
For he (Yahuah) hath put all things under his feet. But
when
he (Yahuah) saith all things are put under him (Yah'ushua), it is
manifest that he (Yahuah)
is excepted which did put all things under
him (Yah'ushua). 28 And when
all things shall
be subdued unto him(Yah'ushua), then shall the Son also himself be
subject unto him (Yahuah) that put all things under him, that Elohim
[Yahuah](God) may be all in all."

KJV
has "even"
the Father as though he is inclusive of others when it should be
rendered "indeed", ie. exclusively the very Father alone.
This is confirmed by the use of "excepted" in verse 26
further conveying the exclusivity of the Father from the Son.

So,
to put it another
way, 1 Cor 15:24 is plainly exposing the lie of Yah'ushua (pw
Jesus) indeed being
“the very God” for it is saying that the fact that the Son is
subject to the Father at the end of his appointed authority shows
that he is NOT indeed the very God. It is the Father who is indeed
the very all in all Elohim, in other words, Sovereign Potentate (pw
Godhead), and NOT
Yah'ushua. Appointed power is never above its sovereign master (pw
Godhead).

Mat
10:24 The disciple is not above his master, nor the servant above his
master.

In
1 Cor 15:24 the Messiah is neither above nor equal in position
but
under the
sovereign Elohim. Scriptures refer to him being equal in
other ways, eg. by kinship, etc. but not in sovereignty. (Covered in
more
detail later)

Back to the history
of the trinity : Arius still maintained that there was only one God
and that Jesus was the Son of God. He claimed that by
exalting
the Son to equality with the Father they were destroying the great
truth of the unity of Elohim (pw God). He told the meeting
that he
rejected
the Nicene Creed and everything that this meeting had
endorsed.
In reply, the meeting then rejected Arius, and declared his "One
God" teaching as "Arian heresy"
because he would not accept that Messiah is of the same substance as
Elohim (pw God).

After this, Arianism quickly disappeared from within
the Roman Empire. However, his followers remained active outside the
Empire, particularly through the preaching of Bishop Ulfilas who
converted many Germanic tribes to “Christianity” in northern
Europe.

A second Council Meeting was held at
Constantinople fifty years later, in AD 381 to ratify the doctrine of
the Trinity. It approved the wording Homo
Ousious
(of one substance), and then affirmed that the “Holy” Spirit was
a person. After a few amendments were made, the Nicene Creed
was adopted, all of which were first propounded at Nicaea in AD
325.
Conservative churchmen, however, hesitated to use this non-Biblical
term Homo Ousious.

The introduction of
the Trinity created much discord within this “Church” which raged
on for many years, causing another Council to be held at Ephesus in
AD 431. This meeting was to resolve some unfinished business,
and to make further amendments, to the "Christian Trinity”
which had been promulgated at the Nicaea and Constantinople
Meetings. At this meeting, the Bishop of Alexandria came
forward and introduced the idea that the Virgin Mary should be called
the "Mother of God". He used the word Theotokos,
"Birthgiver of God" to pacify the people
concerning this new doctrine of the Trinity. He also proposed
that Mary should be worshipped as the "Mother of God".
Nestorius, the Bishop of Constantinople on the other hand, asserted
that the so-called “Divine” nature did indeed dwell in Jesus but
He was not fully Elohim (pw God), nor could he accept that the Virgin
Mary is the
Mother of Elohim (pw God). The Meeting then condemned
Nestorius as a
heretic for not accepting the Trinity.

It is ironic that
this meeting should have taken place in Ephesus where they were
pursuing the old pagan ideas of Isis and Cybele, the great mother
goddesses, and Diana, the virgin goddess of the Ephesians whom the
Apostle Paul denounced while on his missionary journey when he
arrived at Ephesus, as we read in Acts 19:26-29,35.

It took over 200 years, and no less than five Councils to
hammer
out, refine, and finalise the doctrine of
the Trinity. Many proposals and counter proposals were put
forward and debated at these meetings. Every minutest detail
and every possibility of Messiah's relationship to the Father were
argued and debated over and over again. Many of the clergymen
at that time sincerely believed that within the one Elohim (pw God),
there are
three “Divine” Persons - the Father, the Son and the "Holy Ghost"
or "Holy Spirit". Whislt one can be sincerely wrong, error can also be
wilfully chosen by not taking the time to seek the truth in the
scriptures and following the vain teachings of men.

The advent of the Trinity which evolved
from these
Council Meetings appears to be a concept drawn from the Mythologies
of ancient Egypt and Babylon. It did not form part of the Apostles'
original teachings as recorded in the Renewed Everlasting Covenant (pw
New Testament), but was a
product of many factors which were forming in this thing called
“Church”, particularly in Egypt during the 3rd and 4th
centuries. By that time everyone had lost sight of the simple
teachings of Yah'ushua and the Apostles; and theology had taken its
place. It is interseting to note that the word "theology" is not in
scripture and is related to the invented Roman Vulgate word "theos"
from which we get the pagan word Divine or god from Hinduism's sun
gods / Divas etcetera. It has nothing to do with Yahuah the Almighty
in shamayim. He is not a sun-god or a sky god and neither is his Son.

The
word "deity" derives from
the Latin
deus ("god"), which is related through a common
Indo-European origin to Sanskrit deva ("god"), devi
("goddess"), divya ("transcendental",
"spiritual"). The root is related to words for "sky",
such as Latin dies ("day"), and the Sanskrit div,
divus, diu ("sky", "day",
"shine").
Also related are "divine" and "divinity," from
the Latin "divinus," from "divus."

[Deity - Wikipedia, the free
encyclopedia.htm]

Constantine however felt satisfied that
for the
first time his “Church” had a recognized set of "Christian"
doctrines which are still adhered to today through the pagan Roman
Catholic church and its Protestant “children”

As the
decisions of these
Councils were
intended for universal acceptance throughout the Roman Empire, those
who would not subscribe to them were declared heretics. Ultimately a
law was passed in AD 719 making the worship of the Trinity compulsory
in all “churches”.

Shortly after this, however, it was
discovered that
the Western and Eastern sections of the Church were not unanimous in
accepting the Trinity as it stood. They disagreed on how the
“Holy” Spirit is derived. The Greek Orthodox Church used the
original text of the Nicene Creed which stated that the Holy Spirit
proceeds from the Father. They base their belief on John
15:26

"But when the Comforter is
come, whom
I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which
proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me."

The Church in Rome, in the meanwhile,
inserted the
filioque Clause (Latin for, and
from the Son)
into the Nicene Creed as they felt that the Holy Spirit proceeded
from both the Father and the Son together, so as to conform to the
Egyptian trinities. This view was rejected by the Eastern
Church as they believe that the Father alone produced both the Son
and the "Holy Spirit". This dispute remains a serious obstacle to the
reunification of the two pagan “Churches” to this day. The
Roman Catholic and the Greek Orthodox Churches each claim that their
Trinity is the right one. These two "Christian Churches” have
been divided over the Trinity for nearly a thousand years.

The Apostle Paul warned of an imminent
departure
by the congregations*, from the simple teachings of Yah'ushua.

Acts
20:28-31 Take heed brethren unto yourselves and to all the flock for I
know
this that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you
not sparing the flock. Also of your own selves shall men
arise
speaking perverse things to draw away disciples after them.
Therefore watch and remember, that by the space of three years I
ceased not to warn everyone night and day with tears .

Another stern warning

1Cor
8:5-7 "For though there be that are called mighty ones, [elohim, which
are not – in other words idols] (pw -gods), whether
in shamayim or on Earth. But to us there is but ONE Mighty One
[Elohim], the Father,
of whom are all things, and
we in Him; ANDone
Yah'ushua Messiah, by whom are all things and we by him.
Howbeit there is not in every man this knowledge.

Shaul makes no mention of a "god the spirit" either here but in Hebrews
says the Father Elohim is the source of the spirits.

Heb
12:9b"....shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of
spirits, and live?"

The
Ruach (breath) of Yahuah was made to rest upon his Son, it came out of
the Father, it is not a third pagan god to be prayed to as popularised
by the Benny Hinn cult book "Good morning Holy Spirit". It is not a
person, it is only personfied. Wisdom in Proverbs has been
personified as a woman but nobody added "god the wisdom", so why a "god
the spirit"? The blood of Abel
also cries out but it is not a god, it is merely personified as it
bears
direct witness of Cain and all the prophets murdered.

The spirit of
Yahuah consists of seven attributes:

Is
11:1 And the spirit of Yahuah (1) (pw the LORD) shall rest upon him
(Yah'ushua), the spirit of wisdom(2) and understanding(3), the spirit
of counsel(4) and might(5), the spirit of knowledge(6) and of the fear
of the Yahuah(7);

These spirits /attributes/
powers / thoughts are OF Elohim, ie. they belong to and proceed from
Him,
have been given to the Lamb (Yah'ushua) who has sent them forth as the
comforter into all the earth from the Father to all who
believe.

Rev
5:6 And I beheld, and, lo, in the midst of the throne and of the four
beasts, and in the midst of the elders, stood a Lamb as it had been
slain, having seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven Spirits
of Elohim sent forth into all the earth.

The
spirit is merely the attributes of Yahuah's power and
core character itself, and so, when it is despised it is as if one is
directly despising or grieving Yahuah after receiving the revelation of
his thoughts, wisdom, etc (turning from the light). It is rejecting the
fullness of the knowledge, power, might, understanding and
fear
of Yahuah
revealed through his spirit that one is then turning away from and
there can be no excuse for that. It is what Satan did.

The set
apart Ruach is not a person!

A
trinity
idea of only three is somewhat lacking if one truly DEIFIES SPIRITS
like a true pagan and loves to make a corrupted polytheism of the One
TRUE ELOHIM Yahuah. That pagan should rather go all the way to
gehenna (pw hell) in an express train and do his worst and invent a god
the father, god the son, god the wisdom, god the fear, god the
understanding, god the knowledge, god the counsel, god the spirit, etc.
But
perhaps that would have obviously been too pagan back then and they had
to be more subtle. Perhaps this will be the next pantheon of pagan gods
they will invent in the future as they paganise the scriptures further.
In fact, the
very pagan and catholic pentecostal charismaniac Benny Hinn went so far
as to invent a greater number within his trinity at some stage. "As
Hinn's popularity increased due to his television program and the
runaway sales of Good Morning, Holy Spirit, his teachings came under
close scrutiny by several apologetics ministries. The Christian
Research Institute became especially alarmed by Hinn's references to
the Godhead that seemed at best unorthodox and at worst heretical. On
both his television program and in his book, Hinn asserted that all
three persons of the so-called Triune Godhead have their own
independent bodies,
souls, and spirits, as well as wills (10/13/90, TBN)"

ref: www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/exposes/hinn/general.htm

This is an example of what rubbish is shown on Trinity Broadcasting
Network. Ironically this heretic broadcaster of the Trinity doctrine
also boasts of its love for the pope as a man of God as does Hinn.
Trinity
Broadcasting Network also clearly admitted years ago that Messiah
himself does not say he is Elohim ( pw God) anywhere yet they continue
with the lie of the catholic church since they are her agents.

Copeland:
...we're still questioning what was said about that prophecy. That
prophecy never mentioned Son of God, it never said anything about the
son of God.

Crouch: What did it say?

Copeland: it said I did
not claim to be God, that's all it's saying

Crouch : and in other
words in so many words, you're right in the New Testament did he
literally get up...

Copeland : Yet you claim
that he was God

Crouch : ...and say that
I am God did he? No I stand corrected.

If
the late Paul Crouch were corrected and if Kenneth Copeland was
correcting him then why did they still continue serving the
pope
and still do in the case of Copeland with his recent call to join with
the Vatican.

The
catholic church has done its worst in any case, they created
enough Saints
to be prayed to every day of the year (365). In setting them
up as
sky deities to be prayed to they are indeed deified gods, including
Mary
of course. They thus pray to the dead and make themselves the
masters of necromancy which is an abomination and punishable by death
under Yah'uah's coming judgement. And let's not forget their
god
"Saint" Nicholas or Saint Nick who encourages and rewards those who
"nick" / steal stuff,
the
"saint" of thieves who is worshipped is none other than SANTA (SATAN)
by the whole
world. He certainly is the robbing demon, deceiving children with pagan
worship and idolatry and turning them away from Yah'ushua robbing them
of their reward of salvation. Martin
Luther and the Protestants (daughters of the harlot church) merely
offered soft porn as it were in the
form of another idol for their pagan festival Christmas. For Satan
worshippers Yah'uah's
sovereignty must be undermined at all costs. For more see "Saving Christmas?"

Paul's prophecy of what would happen
after his
departure was a warning of the debacle that would divide the
believers very early on after his departure. These early so-called
"church fathers" (fathers of lies)
in
the 3rd
and 4th centuries had already denounced much of the To'rah that
Messiah taught and that the disciples, apostles and believers had
followed in the first century. Since they rejected the light it is no
wonder that they wandered into the deeper darkness of trinity heresy
and then into idolatry of a Messiah who is a god and then on to the
abomination of Mary as the Mother of God. More darkness would follow
as they began to create their own doctrines. One could be tempted to
blame it on the scriptures themselves as if they are written in such
a way that there may have been apparent contradictions, but there are
no contradictions in the scriptures. Elohim is not the author
of
confusion. They really simply wanted a
replacement religion, one that would replace the To'rah. They chose
darkness with the invention of To'rah-less Christianity and
its trinity which blasphemes the sovereignty of Yahuah.

----
00O00 ----

The
Church's Greatest Lie Exposed -1 Timothy 3:16

The
Roman Catholic Church and its daughter the Protestant, Christian
conglomerate had to create a supposed doctrinal support for their
lying doctrines:

"Jesus is
God" "Jesus
is God in the flesh""Jesus
is God incarnate""Jesus
is the very God"... etc

It
seems their supposed success was achieved once again by their use of
their own corrupted tranlsations that they had time to conjure up while
they witheld them from the masses, the laity.They had plenty of time to
tweak and corrupt the Hebrew and /or Greek into pagan Latin. Their
"greatest" work would probably be 1 Timothy 3:16 as seen today
in the KJV still being used as doctrinal support across the
trinitarian spectrum of deceivers.

1 Tim 3:16 "...God was mainifest
in the flesh..."

The half asleep and illiterate
would not realise this to be a direct contradiction to Yah'uah (pw God)
himself

Numbers 23:19
God is not
a man, that he should lie;neither the
*son of man,
that he should repent...

The
foolish, like so many of us at one time or another, accepted their lie.But
now by the kindess of Yah'uah many of us who love the truth are being
shown that very truth and the lies of Babylon are beign exposed once
and for all! The horrendous corruption of 1 Timothy 3:16 is still
evident in most modern KJV versions. In the copy I
have on hand a Ninth Impression 1992 based on the 1962 edition of the
American Bible Society I find the following

1Tim
3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God*
was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels,
preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into
glory.

Very
clearly the publication indicates an asterisk next to "God". This
inidcates an "alternative reading and rendering" which is supplied at
the back. The alternate reading provided or suggested woud then be:

1Tim 3:16 And without controversy great is
the mystery of godliness: He
who was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit,
seen of
angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received
up into glory.

Already
we see the papal walls of Rome crumbling, "Elohim" (pw God) is not even
there in the alternate rendering. No such corrupted version of 1 Tim
3:16 existed in any manuscript neither did any reference to
it exist until
after the creation of the trinity doctrine as set out in
the chapter" History of the Trinity". The conclusion is clear -
corruption of the truth was necessary to support a corrupt religion.

At
this point
it becomes paramount to further take note of what the
subject in the sentence is. The subject is "the mystery of godliness".
The subject is not "God" himself here. "godliness" is the pagan
translation's useless attempt at replacing the Greek
"eusebeia" which means piety ie. being morally set apart to Yah'uah (pw
holiness). Thus the subject is referring to an attitude, action or
behaviour that is toward
Elohim and not referring to Elohim Himself. The mystery then is NOT
about how is it possible for Jesus to be God? That is never the
question here since every true disciple knows Numbers 23:19 as above
prohibits any such question, but rather, how is it possible
for a man to behave totally set apart and pious in obedience to
Yah'uah? This is what is being declared. It made no sense for
the translator to have made any error here unless it was intentional.

The declaration that
"he", someone, in the flesh was shown to us, justified in the spirit,
seen of malakhim (pw angels), preached unto the Gentiles, believed on
in the world and recived up into splendour (pw glory), this is the
answer to the mystery and there is NO CONTRVOERSY, NO CONTRADICTION.
Did you hear that? He who was shown to us as being fully
obedient and morally pure does not contradict Numbers 23:19, he is not
Elohim, he is a man and remains a man, he remains the son of Elohim -
it is Yah'ushuah. The mystery that a man sent from above could be
perfect and morally pure unto Yahuah and re-enter into shamayim (pw
heaven) is the mystery that is no longer a mystery or a question, it
has been seen and declared without CONTROVERSY, without
CONTRADICTION.

The further stupidty of statiing "God" was seen by malakhim (pw angels)
as some new revelation would be even more laughable. That Yah'uah would
need justifying by his own spirit is a double joke, and that He would
be received up in splendour (pw glory) a triple great mystery since by
whom would He be received by and given honour by? In this way the
question rather than being answered by the scriptures is
instead turned into some typical agnostic mystery by the Catholic
Church.

Rome wants to contradict the true Elohim and thus they inserted "God"
with "was manifest in the flesh". Forgery was the order of
the day.

An overview of the crime or
"error" ( reference
https://proveyourfaith.wordpress.com/2010/11/14/1-timothy-316-they-changed-who-to-god/
)

Codex Alexandrinus

Note: O C which means "who" (Greek O C
changed to Θ‾C which means theos "God". Line above with darker
ink supports evidence of a modern forgery (ie. after the
invention of trinity doctrine and not before)

Codex Sinaiticus

The same forgery was attempted in the Codex Sinaiticus (??)

I would call this a truly perfect example of what is today called the
Mandela Effect, the name for the
phenomenon where a fact is distorted by false information (in this case
by forgery) which then seems to continue as a fact or truth regardless
of the
information having been corrected or changed. This type of phenomenon
received its name when Nelson Mandela was reported to have died at an
earlier time in his life and many continued
to believe he was dead despite later reports of his
activities. This has indeed happened to the world of Christianity who
is living under the Mandela Effect of the Catholic Church. The
corruption of 1 Tim 3:16 has been exposed and corrected by numerous
translations yet denominations around the world still
declare Jesus is God manifest in the flesh and use 1 Tim 3:16
in its corrupted form. So what about you? Are you still under the
Mandela Effect of Rome? Another example would be if I were to ask you
to insert the missing word in the sentence - "We are saved / justified
by ______ alone." Nine out of ten times the answer would
undoubtedly be incorrect based upon another corrupted
translation made around 500 years ago by Martin Luther! Although most
translations do not render it this way at all the heretical slogan has
stuck and continues to be used by the false church system just like the
"God in the flesh" fable as if it were true scripture - another Mandela
Effect. For the correct missing word See Romans 12:28 KJV and compare
with James 2:24. - [See our aritcle Faith Alone? for help]

Now, if we investigate 1 Tim 3:16 further, some texts even have "who"
or" which" in place of "God". We agree most strongly with "which",
since, as we stated previously, it is the mystery of
set apartness (pw godliness), that is the subject, not "God" or a
person that is
being referred to, so "which" fits grammatically.

The following list is from http://www.TrinityTruth.org where 25
translations are shown with the correct translation ( we do not
neccessarily endorse any of these 'bibles" in part or whole). They show
how, despite the numerous correct translations, the lie or error
continues to live on with gusto.

1Timothy 3:16

(ASV) “And
without controversy great is the mystery of godliness; He who was
manifested in the flesh, Justified in the spirit, Seen of angels,
Preached among the nations, Believed on in the world, Received up in
glory.”

(BBE) “And
without argument, great is the secret of religion: He who was seen in
the flesh, who was given God's approval in the spirit, was seen by the
angels, of whom the good news was given among the nations, in whom the
world had faith, who was taken up in glory.”

(CEV) “Here
is the great mystery of our religion: Christ
came as a human. The Spirit proved that he pleased God,
and he was seen by angels. Christ was preached to the nations. People
in this world put their faith in him, and he was taken up to glory.”

(CJB) “Great
beyond all question is the formerly hidden truth underlying our faith:
He was manifested physically and proved righteous spiritually, seen by
angels and proclaimed among the nations, trusted throughout the world
and raised up in glory to heaven.”

(CENT) “By
common confession, great is the mystery of godliness: he was revealed
in the flesh, was vindicated in the Spirit, seen by angels, preached
among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(ESV) “Great
indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness: He was manifested in
the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among
the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(GNB) “No
one can deny how great is the secret of our religion: He appeared in
human form, was shown to be right by the Spirit, and was seen by
angels. He was preached among the nations, was believed in throughout
the world, and was taken up to heaven.”

(HCSB) “And
most certainly, the mystery of godliness is great: He was manifested in
the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen by angels, preached among the
Gentiles, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(LONT) “And,
confessedly, great is the secret of godliness; -he who has manifested
in the flesh, justified in the Spirit; seen of messengers, proclaimed
to the Gentiles, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(MSG) “This
Christian life is a great mystery, far exceeding our understanding, but
some things are clear enough: He appeared in a human body, was proved
right by the invisible Spirit, was seen by angels. He was proclaimed
among all kinds of peoples, believed in all over the world, taken up
into heavenly glory.”

(MRC) “And
as agreed by common consent great is the mystery of piety: He Who was
manifested in the flesh, was justified in the Spirit, seen by angels,
proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in
glory.”

(NASB) “By
common confession, great is the mystery of godliness: He who was
revealed in the flesh, Was vindicated in the Spirit, Seen by angels,
Proclaimed among the nations, Believed on in the world, Taken up in
glory.”

(NCV) “Without
doubt, the secret of our life of worship is great: He was shown to us
in a human body, proved right in spirit, and seen by angels. He was
preached to those who are not Jews, believed in by the world, and taken
up in glory.”

(NET) “And
we all agree, our religion contains amazing revelation: He was revealed
in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed
among Gentiles, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(NIRV) “There
is no doubt that godliness is a great mystery. Jesus
appeared in a body. The Holy Spirit proved that he was the
Son of God. He was seen by angels. He was preached among the nations.
People in the world believed in him. He was taken up to heaven in glory.”

(NIV) “Beyond
all question, the mystery of godliness is great: He appeared in a body,
was vindicated by the Spirit, was seen by angels, was preached among
the nations, was believed on in the world, was taken up in glory.”

(NLT) “Without
question, this is the great mystery of our faith: Christ
appeared in the flesh and was shown to be righteous by the
Spirit. He was seen by angels and was announced to the nations. He was
believed on in the world and was taken up into heaven.”

(NLV) “It
is important to know the secret of Godlike living, which is: Christ came to earth as a Man. He
was pure in His Spirit. He was seen by angels. The nations heard about
Him. Men everywhere put their trust in Him. He was taken up into heaven.”

(NRSV) “Without
any doubt, the mystery of our religion is great: He was revealed in
flesh, vindicated in spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among Gentiles,
believed in throughout the world, taken up in glory.”

(RSV) “Great
indeed, we confess, is the mystery of our religion: He was manifested
in the flesh, vindicated in the Spirit, seen by angels, preached among
the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(RV) “And
without controversy great is the mystery of godliness; He who was
manifested in the flesh, justified in the spirit, seen of angels,
preached among the nations, believed on in the world, received up in
glory.”

(TCNT) “Yes,
and confessedly wonderful are the deep truths of our religion; for--
'He was revealed in our nature, pronounced righteous in spirit, seen by
angels, proclaimed among the Gentiles, believed on in the world, taken
up into glory.'”

(UPDV) “And
without controversy great is the mystery of godliness; He who was
manifested in the flesh, Justified in the spirit, Seen of angels,
Preached among the nations, Believed on in the world, Received up in
glory.”

(WmsNT) “Undoubtedly
the mystery of our religion is a great wonder: "He was made visible in
human form; He was vindicated by the Spirit; He was seen by angels; He
was proclaimed among the heathen; He was trusted in throughout the
world; He was taken up to glory.”

(WNT) “And,
beyond controversy, great is the mystery of our religion - that Christ appeared in human form,
and His claims justified by the Spirit, was seen by angels and
proclaimed among Gentile nations, was believed on in the world, and
received up again into glory.”

We also note the trinitarian Albert Barnes' explanation below
and highlight the fact that he remained a trinitarian all the same.
This would mean that Mr Barnes also did not believe Elohim (pw God) in
Numbers 23:19, or simply ignored Him, rather hanging to a Catholic
fabrication - the Mandela Effect had developed into a lie that was now
believed. If one tells a lie often enough it can be accepted as truth
by the deceived and the teller of the lie will soon believe his own lie
too. The To'rah is clear that there must be 2 or more witnesses to
establish a truth and Yah'uah (through Num23;19 and many other places)
is not a second witness to a false rendering of 1 Tim 3:16 but a
witness who exposes its corruption by the Catholics of Constantine.

Albert Barnes' Notes on the Bible, (1798-1870)
“God - Probably there is no
passage in the New Testament which has excited so much discussion among
critics as this, and none in reference to which it is so difficult to
determine the true reading. It is the only one, it is believed, in
which the microscope has been employed to determine the lines of the
letters used in a manuscript; and, after all that has been done to
ascertain the exact truth in regard to it, still the question remains
undecided. It is not the object of these notes to enter into the
examination of questions of this nature. A full investigation may be
found in Wetstein. The question which has excited so much controversy
is, whether the original Greek word was Θεὸς Theos, “God,” or whether
it was ὅςhos, “who,” or ὁho, “which.” The controversy has turned, to a
considerable degree, on the reading in the “Codex Alexandrinus;” and a
remark or two on the method in which the manuscripts in the New
Testament were written, will show the true nature of the controversy.
Greek manuscripts were formerly written entirely in capital letters,
and without breaks or intervals between the words, and without accents;
see a full description of the methods of writing the New Testament, in
an article by Prof. Stuart in Dr. Robinson's Biblotheca Sacra, No. 2,
pp. 254ff The small, cursive Greek letters which are now used, were not
commonly employed in transcribing the New Testament, if at all, until
the ninth or tenth centuries. It was a common thing to abridge or
contract words in the manuscript. Thus, πρ would be used for
πατερpater, “father;” κς for κυριοςkurios, “Lord;” Θς for Θεος Theos,
“God,” etc. The words thus contracted were designated by a faint line
or dash over them. In this place, therefore, if the original uncials
(capitals) were Θ¯C¯, standing for Θεὸς Theos, “God,” and the line in
the Θ, and the faint line over it, were obliterated from any cause, it
would easily be mistaken for OC - ὅςhos - “who.”
To ascertain which of these is the true reading, has been the great
question; and it is with reference to this that the microscope has been
resorted to in the examination of the Alexandrian manuscript. It is now generally admitted that the faint line
“over” the word has been added by some later hand, though
not improbably by one who found that the line was nearly obliterated,
and who meant merely to restore it. Whether the letter O was originally
written with a line within it, making the reading “God,” it is now said
to be impossible to determine, in consequence of the manuscript at this
place having become so much worn by frequent examination. The Vulgate
and the Syriac read it: “who,” or “which.” The Vulgate is, “Great is
the sacrament of piety which was manifested in the flesh.” The Syriac,
“Great is the mystery of godliness, that he was manifested in the flesh.”

An easier understanding of how the "error" or rather corruption took
place - watch this short video.

The Mindless Mystery of the Trinity

So
after creating their greater confusion and deeper mystery instead of
solving it the Roman Catholics then have further excuse that
the trinity is a mystery that cannot be understood by mere
mortals and
must therefore just be accepted by what they call faith. This is of
course is not the correct word
- which in Hebrew is emunah /moral fideltiy, conviction to
obey the truth [not a lie]. Yahuah has
not concealed any trinity but
rather
made it clear who He is (spirit) and who the
Son came as (flesh) throughout scripture, and the one is not
the other as stated in Number 23:19 already! It is only false teachers
who have
concealed the truth with deception.

The so called biblical
doctrines are not to be accepted as such merely because they are
labelled "biblical" or "christian". We do not accept doctrine by
mindless so called "faith" a pagan goddess inserted into the
translation of the scriptures. We trust not in godesses which we simply
carry around as amulets, but we have
emunuh (pw faith), an active moral conviction which requires a
conscious decision
with reasoning and testing of every spirit.

1 John 4:1 Beloved, believe
not every spirit, but try the spirits
whether they are of Elohim (pw
God): because many false prophets are gone out into the world.

2 Hereby know ye
the Spirit of Elohim (pw God): Every spirit that
confesseth that
Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) Messiah (pw Christ) is come in the flesh is of
Elohim (pw God):
3 And every
spirit
that confesseth not that Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) Messiah (pw Christ) is
come in the flesh is not of Elohim (pw God): and this is that spirit
of anti-Messiah (pw anti-Christ), whereof ye have heard
that it should
come; and even now already is it in the world.
4 Ye
are of Elohim (pw God), little children, and have overcome them:
because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.

Yah'uah does not create mindless
mysteries or secrets for his true disciples

but reveals understandable truth
which exposes bogus lies:

Amos 3:7
"Surely the Master Elohim will do nothing, but he revealeth
his secret unto his servants the prophets."

Prov.
25:2 "It is a splendour of Elohim to conceal a thing but the
honour of kings is to search out a matter."

John 18:20
"Yah'ushua answered him, I spake openly to the world; I ever taught in
the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews always resort; and
in secret have I said nothing"

Isaiah
1:18 "Come now, and let us reason together,
saith Yahuah ..."

Acts 17:11
"These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with
all readiness of mind, and searched
the scriptures daily,
whether those things were so"

Acts 18:4 "And he (Paul) reasoned*
in the synagogue every sabbath, and persuaded the Yahudim(worshppers of
Yah) (false modern
word-Jews) and the Greeks.

You
must besides other things, apply all your mind
to love Yahuah in order to make a morally
convicted choice to serve and obey him correctly for who He is and what
He commands.This
is one of the reasons why a drunkard cannot
enter shamayim ( pw heaven) He / she does not have or refuses to have
their full
mental faculties and reasoning to fully understand, serve and
obey Yahuah.

It must not be forgotten that Sir Isaac Newton a man of almost
obessesional study habits also studied the scriptures. Although he did
not get all the scriptures right he did soon see through the lies of
the Trinty doctrine by applying his mind and was one of the early
people to question the corruption of 1 tim 3:16 as discussed in the
previous chapter.

The Egghead Godhead?

When
one presses a trinitarian to explain the trinity they may make an
attempt at using a physical example of the trinity and perhaps some of
us settled for this explanation when we still followed the trinity
heresy. (Been there done that).
They say :the egg is one egg, right, (Godhead), but it
has three parts, the shell, the yolk and the white. That is
the trinity they say - all different parts but the same egg. Wow, what
a
revelation! That sure cleared things up for
us, after all it was something to hold onto after being told that the
trinity is an unsolvable mystery and we are not to question "G-o-d".
Sadly, when some of us found out the truth about the trinity lie all
that
was left was egg on our own faces, or we could hear the Humpty Dumpty
nursery rhyme
playing in the background. This is simply a way out for the "egghead",
the thoughtless,
mindless "faith" based pagan trinity doctrine and not the emunah (moral
conviction) based doctrine which includes a conscious seeking of the
truth in the
scriptures as they are written and not sermonized by catholic
philosophers. When they cannot explain it physically they then try to
do away with the physical realm as in the following discussion.

1+1+1=1... Really!?

Mr Morrison, a defender of trinitarianism has this to say:

“In
the world of
spirit, the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are God, unified in a way that
material objects cannot be. Our math is based on material things; it
does not always work in the infinite, spiritual realm.”

Mr
Morrison has no choice then but to deny the material flesh of Messiah
coming into the material world in order for his “spiritual trinity”
heresy (1+1+1=1) to be able to work.

This is the anti Messiah spirit

1
John 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Yah'ushua (pw
Jesus) Messiah (pw Christ) is come in the flesh is not of Elohim (pw
God): and this is that spirit of antiMessiah (pw Christ), whereof ye
have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the
world.

The
Creator Yah'uah remains one regardless of the physical or the spiritual
realm whether before he created (begot) Yah'ushua or after. Yah'uah is
still Elohim alone. He created the ordinances (laws) of physics and
maths themselves and rules over them and to say that these laws prevent
a trinity from making sense already shows from whence the trinity
orignates, the minds of worldly men! Yah'uah has told us that he is
ONE, if he meant three he would have said so. He is not mathematically
challenged in the spiritual world neither in the physical world.

The
Author Of Confusion - "in the beginning"

Now
that we have established that a sound mind and logical
reasoning within the
scriptures are required to test a doctrine such as the trinity it is
obvious that Satan, the author of confusion, would use scripture itself
in the hands of deceptive translators and teachers to mislead men from
the order of Yahuah's sovereignty and towards disorder.

I Cor14:26
How is it then, brethren? when ye come together, every one of you hath
a psalm, hath a
doctrine, hath a tongue, hath a revelation, hath an interpretation.
Let all things be done unto edifying. 27 If any man speak in
an
unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most by three, and that by
course; and let one interpret. 28 But if there be no
interpreter,
let him keep silence in the assembly (pagan word -church); and let him
speak to himself, and to Elohim. 29 Let the prophets speak
two or
three, and let
the other judge.
30 If any thing be revealed to another that sitteth by, let the first
hold his peace. 31 For ye may all prophesy one by one, that
all
may learn, and all may be comforted. 32 And the spirits of
the
prophets are subject to the prophets. 33 For Elohim is not the
author of confusion*,
but of shalom (pw-peace), as in all assemblies of the
saints. 34 Let your women keep silence in the assemblies: for
it
is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under
obedience, as also saith the law. 35 And if they will learn
any
thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women
to speak in the assembly.

So
we see disorder is to be avoided and To'rah commands that believing
wives
be under subjections to their believing husbands. The order
here is order of rank of
authority. The very definition of "order" :

"Regular
arrangement, any methodical arrangement or established succession or
harmonious relation; method system."

Webster's
Collegiate Dictionary

As
soon as the order is rearranged we have disorder. Satan wants disorder
since he wants to be at the top. He has always wanted to be worshipped
and he can receive worship either directly by Satanists, heathens, or
by
deceiving men away from worshipping the Father in spirit and truth.
Satan then receives the worship by default since he is the father of
lies.

Yahuah has not rearranged the order of his sovereignty
at any time. The assembly of true believers does not adopt a Trinity
doctrine but declares the order of arrangement (decreed ordinance) in
keeping Yahuah Elohim as Elohim ( the All Mighty one) at the very top.

1
Cor 11:13 "But I would have you know, that the head of every man is
Messiah; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Messiah
is Elohim (the All Mighty One)."

Paul's context here is the ordinances (order of arrangement)
to be kept the same by the assembly for ever.

1
Cor 11:2 ...keep the ordinances, as I delivered them to you.

The
Trinitarian liars have indeed changed the order (ordinance). This
ultimately
attempts to make the woman not only head over man but over Elohim with
a "Mary
mother of God" designation. It then places a fake "Jesus" as "Indeed
the Very God" but somehow subject to her, and thus perverts the very
sovereignty of Yah'uah and spirtual headship of To'rah keeping men over
To'rah keeping women. Thus blasphemy is made against Elohim (the All
Mighty
One),
attempting to strip Him of his sovereignty (pw Godhead).
Paul clearly has said that any fiddling with the sovereignty of Yahuah
is the device of men just as any idol made of silver or gold makes a
futile representation of Yahuah or any false god.

Acts
17:29 Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of Elohim, we ought not to
think that the sovereign power of Yahauh( pw Godhead) is like
unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man’s device

The basis of this deception relies heavily on
the misconstruing of the well known first chapter of John. We have
added the correct meaning in brackets especially with reference to
“Word” Greek “logos” and its matching Hebrew word
"*dabar".

Firstly
we must remember that Yahuah Elohim has no beginning in the first
place since the eternal sovereign power (pw Godhead) has
self-existence forwards and backwards. The beginning is that beginning
as
described in Genesis when Yahuah created life as
we know it, bound by space and time on our planet earth and within the
surrounding galaxies etc.

“...was
the Word
["dabar" reasoning ] , and the word
was with Elohim, and the Word
[dabar, logos, reasoning, motive, thoughts, work etc ] was Elohim.”

Naturally
therefore the Word (logos) was
present
in the beginning as it was already therebeforethe beginning of
life or creation.
It
was self-existent since it was and
is Elohim.
The use of past tense “was”
in
no way excludes the continuous
existence
of the Word which IS Yahuah since it is eternal backwards and forwards.
The
later referral to the Word becoming
flesh in no way causes this Word to
cease to exist as the sovereign Word Yahuah but rather points to it and
confirms it as such. The word of Yahuah is
what created life.

Genesis 1:3
And Elohim said*, Let there be light: and there was light.

Itbecomes clear very
soon that
this word that was "said" or "amar" by Yahuah is related to
commandment,
appointing,
promise (covenant), intention, desire and thought. This is why "amar"
is
Yahuah - it is His thoughts and intentions - the core of His intent
is to
create life and prevent it from perishing eternally. It is His very
character,
inseperable from His being.

Yahuah refers to Word
(logos) as the very thing that surpasses soul, spirit, bone and marrow
and gets to the all important core of what makes a man or
woman good or evil -
it is the thoughts and intents of the heart.

Hebrews
4:12 For the Word
of Elohim is quick, and powerful, and sharper than
any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and
spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the
thoughts and
intents of the heart.

Luke
6:45 A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth
that which is good; and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his
heart bringeth forth that which is evil: for of the abundance of the
heart his mouth speaketh.Jer
33:36 And the burden of Yahuah shall ye mention no more: for every
man’s word shall be his burden; for ye have perverted the Words of
the
living
Elohim, of the Master of hosts our Elohim

We
thus see how the all powerful word - centre of Yahuah's heart - His
intent and thoughts, examine or reveal the word / logos -
thought and intents of
the core of every man's heart. We see how that when our thoughts and
intents do not match up with Yahuah's it is evil and we speak many
things, but not what Yahuah has spoken.

Jer
9:8 "...one speaketh peaceably to his neighbour with his mouth, but in
heart he layeth his wait."

We
see that Yahuah's "word" goes beyond mere words of men since they may
say one thing and do another. They may flatter when they should warn or
correct. Yahuah's word, instead, is able to penetrate the
heart of man to see if there is life or death in him. Yahuah's intent
or word was to create the light so men could find their way out of
the darkness they had foolishly chosen. So as we continue
with John Chapter 1 ( square brackets my insertions)

John
1:2
The same (His word, dabar logos) was in the beginning with
Elohim. 3 All things were
made by him [Yahuah]; and without him [Yahuah] was not any thing made
that was made. 4 In him [Yahuah] was life; and the life was
the
light of men. [as opposed to darkeness which is the death of
men] 5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness
comprehended it not. 6 There was a man sent
from Yahuah,
whose name was John. 7
The same came for a witness, to bear witness [report, dabar] of the
Light [of
Yahuah], that all men through him [Yahuah] might believe. 8
He
[John] was not that Light [of Yahuah], but was sent to bear witness
of that Light [of Yahuah]. 9 That was the true Light [of
Yahuah], which lighteth every man that cometh into the world. 10 He
[Yahuah] was in the world, and the world was made by him
[Yahuah], and the world knew him [Yahuah] not. 11 He [Yahuah]
came unto his own, and his own received him [Yahuah] not. 12
But as many as received him [Yahuah], to them gave he [Yahuah] power
to become the sons of Elohim, even to them that believe on his name
[Yahuah]: 13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will
of
the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of Elohim.

These
three verses refer to Elohim Yahuah entirely. Many make the mistake of
context here, thinking this is referring to the Messianic age which it
is not. They thus think the "he" who made the world and came into the
world is the Messiah when it is not. It refers to Yahuah
Elohim
when he was in the world with his own people the
Hebrews
with whom he made a covenant in Sinai but they did not know him ( they
did not learn his ways, his Word, logos, "dabar", commands his heart,
his intent.
He had promised the power to be the sons of Elohim by his own
Word (intent). He dwelt amongst them in the tabernacle but they still
did not know him - they did not learn his ways but went after their own
ways. He had given them at that time too the power to become the sons
of Elohim (pw God) but they failed.

Hosea
1:10 Yet the number of the children of Israel shall be as the
sand
of the sea, which cannot be measured nor numbered; and it shall come to
pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my
people, there it shall be said unto them, Ye are the sons of the living
Elohim.

Heb 3:9 When your
fathers tempted me, proved me, and saw my works forty years.
Heb
3:10 Wherefore I was
grieved with that generation, and said, They do alway err in their
heart; and they have not
known my ways.

After
this the context in John 1:14 then only becomes Messianic : Yahuah
has sent men to bear witness of the true light of Yahuah - He has used
Yochanan (John) and then the first begotten Son of Elohim,
Yah'ushua in the flesh so that we can also become the Sons of
Elohim.

John
1:14 And the
Word [of Yahuah] was made 1 flesh 2
[in Yah'ushua], and dwelt among us,
(and we beheld his [Yah'ushua's] splendour, the splendour as of the
only
begotten of the Father,) full of favour 3,
(pw grace) and truth."

1)
1096 ginomai ghin'-om-ahee a prolongation and middle voice form of a
primary verb; to cause to be ("gen"-erate), i.e. (reflexively) to
become (come into being), used with great latitude (literal,
figurative, intensive, etc.):--arise, be assembled, be(-come, -fall,
-have self), be brought (to pass), (be) come (to pass), continue, be
divided, draw, be ended, fall, be finished, follow, be found, be
fulfilled, + Elohim (pw God) forbid, grow, happen, have, be kept, be
made, be
married, be ordained to be, partake, pass, be performed, be published,
require, seem, be showed, X soon as it was, sound, be taken, be turned,
use, wax, will, would, be wrought.

2)
4561
sarx sarx probably from the base of 4563; flesh (as stripped of the
skin), i.e. (strictly) the meat of an animal (as food), or (by
extension) the body (as opposed to the soul (or spirit), or as the
symbol of what is external, or as the means of kindred), or (by
implication) human nature (with its frailties (physically or morally)
and passions), or (specially), a human being (as such):--carnal(-ly, +
-ly minded), flesh(-ly). see GREEK for 4563

3)
5485 charis khar'-ece from 5463; graciousness (as gratifying), of
manner or act (abstract or concrete; literal, figurative or spiritual;
especially the divine influence upon the heart, and its reflection in
the life; including gratitude):--acceptable, benefit, favour, gift,
grace(- ious), joy, liberality, pleasure, thank(-s, -worthy). see GREEK
for 5463

Now
this is where the deception comes in - the scripture clearly says "the
word was made flesh" it does not
say Elohim (God) was made flesh. It is Yahuah's word / logos,
his thoughts and intents, work, commandments, oracles, as
already established, it is this that
has been fleshed out in the form of the witness in Yah'ushua who only
speaks and does the thoughts and intents of his Father out of the
abundance of his heart of flesh upon which the word ( logos, commands)
are written. So the word of Yahuah was made flesh upon the heart of his
Son and this word then dwelt among us, it was spoken by the fleshly
tongue and lips of Yah'ushua. Emmanuel - El (Elohim) is with us
by thought and intent (logos) to give us eternal life. Yah'ushua became
the vessel of the word (logos) and spoke it and carried it out by the
spirit of Yahuah, even unto death so that Yah'uah could express the
penalty of sin (without prejudice that it was His own son) upon
Yahushua who bore our sin, thereafter
expressing Yahuah's splendour and word (promise) upon resurrection of
His own
innocent Son.

Now
lets rewirte John 1:14 using the full and proper word meanings as in
Strong's for "made flesh" (1,2) and "grace" (3) and you will see the
truth come to light concerning Yah'ushua's purpose.

And
the
Word [of Yahuah] was performed and published
physically by a
human
being [Yah'ushua]1,2, and dwelt
among us,
(and we beheld his [Yah'ushua's] splendour, the splendour as of the
only
begotten of the Father,) who was full of Yahuah's influence upon
his
heart and reflected it actively in his life with truth and thanksgiving3.

II
Cor 4:4 In whom the mighty one (pw god) of this world [Satan] hath
blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the
honourable good message of Messiah, who is the image [representation,
like-ness, reflection ] of Yahuah,
should shine unto them. 5 For we preach not ourselves, but Messiah
Yah'ushua the Master; and ourselves your servants for Messiah's sake. 6
For Yahuah, who commanded* the
light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts,
to give
the light of the knowledge (word) of the splendour of
Yahuah in the face
[presence] of Messiah
Yah'ushua.

Clearly
Yahuah
is the true light, not Yah'ushua, Yah'ushua is the reflection of it
(image) , and the true way TO the true light which gives life, and that
is The All Mighty One, Elohim
Yahuah. We are then told why the Son of Yahuah was manifested:

1 John
3:1 Behold, what manner of love the Father (Yahuah) hath
bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of Elohim:
therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him (Yahuah) not. 2
Beloved, now are we the sons of Elohim, and it doth not yet appear
what we shall be: but we know that, when he (Yahuah) shall appear, we
shall be like him (Yahuah, Yahuah-like); for we shall see him
(Yahuah) as he is. 3 And every man that hath this hope in him
purifieth himself, even as he is pure. 4 Whosoever committeth sin
transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. 5
And ye know that he (Yah'ushua) was manifested to take away our
sins; and in him is no sin. 6 Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not:
whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him. 7 Little
children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is
righteous, even as he is righteous. 8 He that committeth sin is of
the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose
the Son of Elohim was
manifested,
that he might destroy the works of the devil.

John
5: 35 He (John) was a burning and a shining light: and ye
were willing for a season to rejoice in his light. 36 But I have
greater witness than that of John: for the works (especially speaking
demonstrating the Word) which the Father
hath given me to finish, the same works that I do, bear witness of
me, that the Father
hath sent me. 37 And
the Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of
me. Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape.

So
Yah'ushua was manifested not to promote a Trinity doctrine that he is
Elohim (pw God) but to show that he is the Son of Yahuah in the flesh,
a
greater
witness of the light than John. Yah'ushua is the forerunner of the
Word (logos, promise, intent)
of Yahuah, that we also might become the sons of Yahuah and fulfill
that
Word (logos) and destroy the works (especially words of
temptation) of the devil. If Yah'ushua is not the
Son but rather Elohim himself then he is not our forerunner as sons of
Elohim
and he then has not begun to destroy the works of the devil but put on
a
charade. That is not the case.

Heb 6:17
Wherein Elohim, willing more abundantly to shew unto the heirs of
promise the immutability of his counsel, confirmed it by an
oath:
18 That by two
immutable things, in which it was impossible for Elohim
to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to
lay hold upon the assurance set before us: 19 Which assurance
we have as an
anchor of the soul, both sure and stedfast, and which entereth into
that within the veil; 20 Whither the forerunner
(first Son of Yahuah) is for us
entered, even Yah'ushua, made an high priest for ever after the order
of Melchisedec.

Next we have the clear revelation of what John was really saying in
Chapter 1. Lets revise:

John
1:1 In the beginning was the word, and the word was with Elohim,
and the word was Elohim. 2 The same was in the beginning with
Elohim. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was
not
any thing made that was made. 4 In him was life; and the life
was
the light of men

John now echoes this same
thought and now describes the word with an additional expression -"word
of life".

1 John
1:1-3 That which was from the beginning, which we have
heard [dabar-Word], which we have seen with our eyes, which we have
looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life; 2 (For
the life was manifested, and we have seen it, and bear witness, and
shew unto you that eternal life, which was with the Father, and was
manifested unto us;) 3 That which we have seen and heard declare we
unto you, that ye also may have fellowship with us: and truly our
fellowship is with the Father, and
with
his Son Messiah Yah'ushua.

John
now shows that from the beginning it is evident that Yahuah Elohim is
the source of life which we can in part witness in this physical world
around us that we can see and touch and that it was created by His word
(logos, intent) from the beginning. It is an example of Yahuah's emunah
(pw faith)
in action through his word.

Heb 11:3
Through emunah (pw faith) we understand that the worlds were
framed by the word
(of life) of Elohim, so that things which are seen were not made of
things which do appear.

He
is the source of life but that life at the beginning was eternal life
since Yahuah is the Word of life eternal and is not Elohim of
the
dead. Adam and Eve did not comprehend the light, they did not
appreciate the state of eternal life until they sinned and received
death - separation from Yahuah and his llight. Man
has been in that state ever since. Since death and darknesss came man
then did not comprehend the light nor the possibility of eternal life
either, even though creation, the very beginning of life bears witness
of the Word of life - Yahuah. This physical world however is
corrupted by sin and dying
around us and thus does not fully reveal the promise of eternal life
very
well as a physical proof to the unbeliever who relies on what he sees
alone.

1 John 1:4
And these things write we unto you, that your joy may be full. 5
This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto
you, that Elohim is light, and in him is no darkness at all. 6 If we
say that we have fellowship with him [Elohim], and walk in darkness,
we lie, and do not the truth: 7 But if we walk in the light, as he
is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood
of Messiah Yah'ushua his Son cleanseth us from all sin.

This, however, was changed when the disciples and or apostles
witnessed Yah'ushua resurrected from the dead. They physcially felt
where the nails were in his hands and ate and drank with him following
his death. This was the eternal life of the Father manifested
in the flesh of his Son, this was the good news passed to us. This is
the Word of life made
flesh, ie. Yah'ushua's dead flesh risen to life by the word of life -
Yahuah.

So
in the beginning was the word of life, the To'rah, the light
that brings eternal life as it did for Messiah, and we must walk in it
now that Messiah has fulfilled the promise of eternal life in his
flesh.

1
Tim 3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of
Yahuah-likeness
(pagan word-godliness): Yahuah (the word of life) was manifestly declared
(explicitly announced, asserted, proclaimed, avowed) in the flesh,
justified in the Spirit, seen of malakhim (pw angels) , preached unto
the heathens
(pagan word Gentiles),
believed on in the world, received up into splendour.

So,
eternal life - the word of life (logos, intent), promise of Yahuah was
fully realised and witnessed in the raising of Messiah's flesh
from death. through his Son being YHUH-like and obeying the Word of
Life.

I John 5:20 And we know
that the Son of
Elohim
is come, and hath
given us an understanding (dabar To'rah), that we may know him that
is true(YAHUAH), and we are in him that is true, even in his Son
Yah'ushua Messiah. This is the true Elohim (YAHUAH), and eternal life
(word of life, word, dabar, logos)

Yah'ushua
the son has manifestly declared, giving us an understanding of the true
Elohim, Word of Life, who gives eternal life which we have witnessed in
his Son, who, in the flesh (visibly) proclaimed his Father's word.

John
5:25 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now
is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of
Elohim: and they
that hear shall live.
26 For as the Father hath
life in himself; so
hath he given
to the Son to have life in himself (given immortality after the
Father raised him) 27 And hath given
him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man.

1
John 1:7 But if we walk in the light (word of life), as he (Elohim) is
in the light,
we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Yah'ushua Messiah
his Son cleanseth us from all sin. 8 If we say that we have no sin,
we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. 9 If we confess
our sins, he is trustworthy (pw faithful) and just to
forgive us our sins, and to
cleanse us from all unrighteousness. 10 If we say that we have not
sinned, we make him a liar, and his word (of life) is not in us. 1 My
little
children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not (DO NOT
TRANSGRESS THE TO'RAH-Word of Life). And if any
man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Messiah Yah'ushua the
righteous:

John
5:2 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto
the
resurrection of life
(Word of Life) ; and they that have done evil, unto the
resurrection of damnation.

So Yah'ushua
was with YHUH in the
very beginning but
at that stage He was not yet begotten, ie. born of Mary in the flesh in
the form of the Son of Elohim (pw God). "Word" can be translated as
"Logos" so you
could say the idea / thought of Yah'ushua the Son was with YHUH
at the very beginning as a plan for our salvation. The Son was hidden
in the bosom (bay) of Yahuah like a ship until Yahuah was ready to send
him forth by his Ruach (wind, breath).

We
see this clear distinction of origin and action in:

1Cor
8:5-7 "For though there be that are called gods* , whether in shamayim
(pw heaven) or
on in Earth. But to us there is but ONE Elohim, (All Mighty ONE- pw
God), the Father,
of whom
are all things (the source - Word of Life), and we in Him; AND
one Yah'ushua Messiah (from the source of life - the Father), by
whom are
all things and we by him. Howbeit there is not in every
man this
knowledge."

If
Paul were a trinitarian he may have written utter nonsense similar to
this:

But
to us there is but one Elohim (God), the Father AND One Elohim (pw God)
Yah'ushuah
who is Elohim (pw God).

But
Paul does not. He says ONE Yah'ushua Messiah and denounces
the idea of plural mighty ones when referring to Elohim (God). There is
not the slightest inclination to include earthly or "heavenly gods" in
THE SOVEREIGNTY (pw GODHEAD) of ELOHIM.

Here we also see "of whom" ascribed to
Elohim (pw God)
the Father and "by whom" ascribed to the Son.

"of
whom" Greek "ek" denotesorigin
of all things that exist by Elohim and
that includes the Son since that is why he is the Son OF
Elohim begotten and created. Over and over again you will see heretics
do
the
unthinkable and exchange the preposition "of" with "is" ie. the Son of Elohim
(pw God) is changed to the Son is Elohim
(pw God). One cannot do that without committing
the damnable sin of adding to scripture.

Paul
places the "by whom"
description on the shoulders of the Son since "by" (Greek dia) is the
preposition denoting the channel
of an act. As we saw before Messiah is
the causer (not author).This is why Yah'ushua is
the WAY or channel by his action of offering (pw sacrifice), love and
obedience to
the Father. The Father is His, and our, origin to whom we wish to be
restored to.
Yah'ushua was fully restored from death (under our sin) to
the Father's eternal life.

Col
2:9 Buried with him (Yah'ushua) in baptism, wherein also ye are risen
with him through the emunah (pw faith) of the operation of Elohim, who
hath raised him (Yah'ushua) from
the dead.

John 20: 27 "Then
saith he to Thomas, Reach
hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and
thrust it into my side: and be not without emunah (pw faithless), but
believing. 28 And
Thomas answered and said unto him, My
Master (pw Lord) and my Elohim (pw God)."

We
should not have to go further than "My Master AND my Elohim"
but for those who are doubting like
Thomas we shall have to.

Regarding John 20:28, the question is
raised concerning Thomas’ double usage of the definite article, most
literally translated: “the lord of me and the god [THEOS] of me.” Did
Thomas use the definite article twice to speak of two persons, first
the son to whom he was directly speaking as “the lord of me” and then
did he turn his attention to the Father in shamayim (pw heaven) in
saying
“the God of me”? If Thomas meant his whole expression to refer to only
one person, only one definite article would have been needed: “the
Master (pw Lord)
and God of me”.

But if Thomas was referring to Yah'ushua when he said “the
THEOS of me”, was he thinking that Yah'ushua was YHUH, the only
Most High of the universe, standing there before him? If Thomas did
indeed refer to Yah'ushua as “the THEOS of me”, we find no such
custom all through the Renewed Everlasting Covenant (pw New Testament)
of referring to Yah'ushua
as “my Elohim (pw God)”, nor “our Elohim (pw God)”. The scripture
writers continuously
distinguish
the Father in shamayim (pw heaven) as “Elohim (pw God)”, and Yah'ushua
as the Son of Elohim (pw God),
the one, made Master (pw Lord) and Messiah (pw Christ), by Elohim (pw
God). If such a claim or doctrine as
"Jesus is God” ("Yah'ushua is Yahuah") is so all-important and a truth
as many
today seem to assume, we should
expect such to be clearly stated many times throughout the scriptures,
but actually, what we find is just the opposite. So, if Thomas
refers to Yah'ushua as his Elohim (pw God) in John 20:28, we have an
exception to the general rule, and should seek to determine in what
sense Thomas might have thought of Yah'ushua as his Elohim (pw God), in
harmony with the general distinction that is made throughout the rest
of the Renewed Everlasting Covenant (pw New Testament). Thus, in
harmony with the Hebraic tradition of
applying the same words that are translated as “elohim (pw god)” to
others as
rulers, princes, mighty ones, etc. we could say Thomas was really
applying one of these options for the word now translated
by Roman
Vulgate translators as THEOS in adressing Yah'ushua . Theos or God
could
be rendered as mighty ruler or mighty prince. In fact, the word
majesty, is
used to describe Yah'ushua's spiritual reign but YHUH is
referred
to as Majesty on High in contrast to Yah'ushua.
Yah'ushua sits next to YHUH upon his throne as you
could expect an appointed Prince would do beside His King in
keeping with
the order of authority.

Now, let's put the verse above into context:

John 20:28 And
Thomas answered and said unto
him, My Lord (Master) and my God (Elohim). 29
Yah'ushua
(pw Jesus)
saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed:
baruch'd (pw blessed) are they that have not seen, and yet have
believed.
30 ¶And many other signs truly did Yah'ushua
(pw Jesus) in
the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this
book: 31 But
these are written, that
ye might believe that Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) is the Messiah (pw
Christ), the Son
of Elohim (pw God); and that
believing ye might
have life through his name.

This would
have been the perfect opportunity for John to say he were Elohim (pw
God), but he
does not, instead he concludes that these things are written that "you
might
believe he is the Son of
Elohim (pw God)."
One would expect the apostle to say something like:

these are written that you might
believe Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) is Elohim (pw God).

Yahuchanon (John, meaning
Yah's chesed, favour) is a
worshipper of Yahuah, a Yahudi (pw Jew) AND a worshipper of His son
Yah'ushua, he is not a trinitarian Catholic, so he does not write lies.

The use of "My Master and My Elohim" rather tie in with

1Co 8:5-7 For
though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth,
(as there be gods many, and lords many,) But
to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we
in him; and
one Master Yah'ushua Messiah, by whom are all things, and we
by him.

Yahuah is ONE, The Almighty One, Elohim,
who
excludes plural gods. It is to this ONE Elohim that Thomas praises,
after adressing his Master Yah'ushua, separating them as two
individuals with the use of "AND". Thomas seperates Yah'ushua from the
sovereignty of Elohim, just as Paul described.

Our
Saviour AND
Our
Saviour - But Only One Elohim.

Elohim
is our saviour who appointed his Son as the means to our
salvation. Simply because Elohim is called the Saviour does not mean we
call the saviour Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) Elohim (pw God). Yahuah is the
ultimate self existent Saviour and there is no saviour besides him.

Is
43:11 "I, even I, am Yahuah (pw the Lord); and beside me there is no
saviour."

Without
Elohim there
is no sent and appointed saviour, eg. Moses, and no saviour Son
Yah'ushua
either.
It has always been Elohim who sent saviours to his people and it is
Elohim who saved the saviour Son from death to life. Thus
Elohim
is the Saviour to all who accept him, and in all things, even his own
Son:

So who do we
expect
and look for? Two saviours. "Elohim our saviour in all things" (vs 10) AND our
sent saviour Son
Yah'ushua (vs
12). Again "And" is Greek "kai" as used by Thomas. So it is not one and
the same Saviour but two different saviours, one is Elohim and the
other the Son of man, period! Note (vs 10) that the doctrine
must
be "put in the proper order" (kosmeo) where Elohim the great
(megas) Saviour is given pre-eminence "of all things" including over
his appointed Son, and not that the Son is a self-existent saviour who
saves himself. This appointed saviour teaches us Yah-likeness
by
example, that is, To'rah obedience to Elohim his Father. So the True
Saviour Yah'uah Elohim results in true salvation which is by righteous
living in this world and is the result of the truly sent saviour
Yah'ushua to the
honour of Elohim. A false saviour "Jesus" who is fabled to save on his
own and becomes an Elohim (Saviour man-God) imposter, on the other
hand,
results in wholesale lawless (To'rahless) living unto destruction in
this present age, as we see in the harlot "church" institution which
deceives the whole world (2 John 1:7, Rev 12:9). It is the
headquarters of the out of order saviour idol "J-esus" through this
trinitarian heresy. This is the age of the false godess
"Grace" of
Babylon and not the result of Yah'uah's "chesed", unmerited favour. It
is devoid of a real working response by the followers, devoid of
thanksgiving, there is no moral conviction to To'rah
obedience. It is all vanity, an impotent "Jesus" saviour god idol who
promotes freedom from To'rah and a hatred for Elohim's law, like so
many
false saviour idols before, eg. Horus, Serapis, etc, with no power to
save
men from their lusts.

2
Tim 3: 4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures (eg sabbath
profaners...) more than lovers of ELOHIM; 5 Having an appearance
of piety (false religion-christianity, catholicism etc), but denying
the
power (wonderful work of Yahuah to empower us to love and obey him)
thereof : from such turn away.

Majesty AND Majesty
on High, But One Elohim.

Yah'ushua is described as follows :

Hebrews 1:3 Who
being the brightness of his (Yahuah's) splendour (pw glory),
and
the express image of his (Yahuah's) person (character, Yah-likeness,
Michael - who is like El), and upholding all things by the
word
of his (Yahuah's) power, when he (Yah'ushua) had by himself purged our
sins, sat down on the
right hand of the Majesty
on high (Yahuah);

To
put into context the misplaced position and authority of Yah'ushua,
one need only look at a popular idolatrous song (pw hymn) that was, and
still is, sung in
many "churches" :

Majesty
worship His Majesty
Unto Jesus, be all glory,
Power and praise
Majesty, Kingdom authority
Flow from His throne,
Unto his own, His anthem raise.

So exalt, lift up on high
The Name of Jesus
Magnify, come glorify,
Christ Jesus the King
Majesty, worship His Majesty
Jesus who died, now glorified,
King of all Kings.

Note
: Yah'ushua is being called Majesty, capital "M" as would be
referred to YHUH Elohim (pw God), but he is not the Majesty on High
although he is
majestic (having authority from the Father).

This seemingly innocent song usurps the throne of YHUH the Almighty
(All Mighty) with a false Jesus, who, as the song says, must receive ALL
power, ALL
glory, and ALL
Praise. All Praise and All Splendour (pw Glory)
and All Power is given to YHUH through his Son's accomplishments. This
is not to say Yah'ushua should not receive any praise as he too is
praiseworthy, but he does not receive ALL of it since he returns the
authority
back to his Father (1 Cor 15:28) so that the Father may be ALL in ALL,
the Almighty ONE.

Revelations clearly makes the distinction as to who is receiving ALL
the splendour (pw- glory) and worship :

Rev
14:7 "Saying with a loud voice, Fear Elohim
(pw God), and
give splendour (pw glory) to him; for the hour of his judgment is come:
and worship
him that made shamayim (pw heaven), and earth, and the sea, and the
fountains of
waters."

Rev 4:6 "And before the throne there was a sea
of glass like unto crystal: and in the midst of the throne, and round
about the throne, were four beasts full of eyes before and
behind. 7 And
the first beast was like a lion, and the second beast like a calf, and
the third beast had a face as a man, and the fourth beast was like a
flying eagle. 8 And
the four beasts had each of them six wings about him; and they were
full of eyes within: and they rest not day and night, saying, kodesh
(pw Holy), kodesh, kodesh, Master (pw Lord) Elohim (pw God) Almighty,
which was, and is,
and is to
come. 9 And
when those beasts give splendour(pw glory) and honour and thanks to him
that sat on
the throne, who liveth for ever and ever,
10 The four and twenty elders fall down before
him that sat on the throne, and worship him that liveth for ever and
ever, and cast their crowns before the throne, saying, 11
Thou art worthy, O Supreme Master (pw Lord),
to receive splendour and
honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy
pleasure they are and were created."

This
is clearly YHUH, the creator of shamayim (pw heaven) and earth and also
creator of Yah'ushua His Son who is begotten. YHUH is sitting
on
His throne, since the Lamb
(Yah'ushua) is the one who takes the book out of YHUH's right hand and
is worthy to open it as follows :

Rev
Chap 5:1 "And
I saw in the right hand of him
that sat on the throne a book written within and on the backside,
sealed with seven seals. 2 And
I saw a strong malakh (pw angel) proclaiming with a loud
voice, Who is worthy to
open the book, and to loose the seals thereof?
3 And
no man in shamayim (pw heaven), nor in earth, neither
under the earth, was able to open the book, neither to look
thereon. 4 And
I wept much, because no man was found worthy to open and to read the
book, neither to look thereon. 5 And
one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the
tribe of Judah, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and
to loose the seven seals thereof.
6 And I beheld, and, lo, in the midst of the
throne and of the four beasts, and in the midst of the elders, stood a
Lamb as it had been slain, having seven horns and seven eyes, which are
the seven Spirits of Elohim (pw God) sent forth into all the earth.
7 And he came and took the book out of the
right hand of him that sat upon the throne.
8 And when he had taken the book, the four
beasts and four and twenty elders fell down before the Lamb, having
every one of them harps, and golden vials full of odours, which are the
prayers of saints. 9 And
they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book, and to
open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to
Elohim (pw God) by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and
people, and
nation; 10 And
hast made us unto our Elohim (pw God) kings and priests: and we shall
reign on the
earth."

From
the above you should be able to see the distinction between YHUH
and Yah'ushua

Hebrews Chapter One

Heb 1, like John 1, has
been popularly used to support "Jesus is God" and
that he is the Creator himself. This idea leads to the worship of the
Son as Elohim (pw God).
This of course is a ridiculous abomination and contradicts the entire
Everlasting Convenant (EC) (pw OT). Nowhere in the entire Hebrew
translation of the EC is such a command given or intimated.
As
you will see once again, translation is key to the
misguidance and deception. We will study Hebrews 1 verse by verse and
use the
actual cross references used by Shaul (Paul) from the Hebrew Tanakh,
Everlasting Covenant (pw Old Testament). We will then summarise with
the alternate correct translation of Hebrews 1 at the end.

1 Elohim (pw
God), who at
sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers
by the prophets,

Here
Shaul makes the clear declaration that it is Yahuah Elohim (pw God) who
has used men to speak to us in the past. This statement then
immediately prepares us for the acceptance of yet another
prophet
who he speaks BY, namely the Son of man from shamayim, the very Son of
Yahuah, but not Yahuah himself, Yah'ushua is another mouthpiece, the
ulitmate one.

2 Hath in
these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir
of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;

It is
clear that the Son of man, as established in the beginning of this
article, is the Son of Yahuah who is not Elohim but the word made
flesh,
in other words, the speaker / mouthpiece of Yahuah who has now been
used to speak to
us when He was sent by the Father from shamayim (pw heaven). He also
has been appointed over all things as a majestic / royal heir ( a son
to the
Majesty on High - Elohim). Now we get "by whom also
he made the worlds" . This
is where many get fooled. The Greek dia for "by" again may mean a
number of things.

1223
dia dee-ah' a primary
preposition denoting the channel of an act; through (in very wide
applications, local, causal, or occasional):--after, always, among, at,
to avoid, because
of (that), briefly, by, for (cause)
... fore, from, in, by occasion of, of, by reason of, for sake,
that, thereby, therefore, X though, through(-out), to, wherefore, with
(-in). In composition it retains the same general importance.

So it
is clear that it should read

"FOR
whom also he made (poieo) the worlds."

Here
it is clear that the worlds were made by the Father specifically so
that they could be given to the Son who is clearly stated as "heir".
The heir receives an inheritance, and what He inherits, whilst
being appointed over the worlds, are us His children (His riches Rev
5:12, not silver and gold) who are obedient
Sons of Yahuah, as Shaul quotes later in chapter 2.

Heb 2:13
Behold I and the children which Elohim (pw God) hath given me.

Our
argument is further strengthened by the fact that "made" (poieo) here
is
probably not intended. "Ginomai" seems to be used more, so when
referring to "made", as used in the following verse 4 of Heb 1,
referring to how
the Son has been "made" (ginomai) better than the malakhim (pw
angels). "poieo", unlike
"ginomai", includes the very specific meaning: "give"

1096 ginomai
ghin'-om-ahee a prolongation and middle voice form of a primary verb;
to cause to be ("gen"-erate), i.e. (reflexively) to become (come into
being), used with great latitude (literal, figurative, intensive,
etc.):--arise, be assembled, be(-come, -fall, -have self), be brought
(to pass), (be) come (to pass), continue, be divided, draw, be ended,
fall, be finished, follow, be found, be fulfilled, + God forbid, grow,
happen, have, be kept, be made, be married, be ordained to be, partake,
pass, be performed, be published, require, seem, be showed, X soon as
it was, sound, be taken, be turned, use, wax, will, would, be wrought.

Thus
we firmly believe it should be

"for
whom also he gave
(poieo) the worlds.

Next:

3 Who being the brightness of his (Elohim's)
honour (pw glory), and the express image of his person (Elohim's
nature), and
upholding (Greek phero) all things by the word of his power,
when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of
the Majesty on high;

Here
again we see that the Son is subject as a spokesperson / mouthpiece
expressing
the image (representation) of the nature of Elohim by word and action.
Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) is by the trinitarians made to appear as some
sovereign god who is the upholder
of all things
in this sentence, but it is Elohim (pw God) who is sovereign. The
word used here is "phero", the sense is toward the response of the
servant who upholds what is given to him. The To'rah given by the
Father is what is upheld. In fact, it is magnified and made honorable
by
the Son as prophesied (Is 42:19-21). He observed all things given
to him under the authority of Yah's To'rah

Yah'ushua
does not "uphold" all things in the sense that he is the master of the
universe and holds the world together that He created himself. No!
Neither is He the source of how or what that upholding should
be, but more accurately, as the definition implies, "endures" those
things which have been appointed to him or "bears" or "observes",
indeed,
lays
all
things (what more did He lay down of his own accord than his own life
given to him). The "all
things", all the sin in the same verse from which He has
purged us. He endured the punishment on the torture stake by himself /
alone ( Mark 15:34 My Elohim, My Elohim why hast thou forsaken me) by
his own offering of his own body,
but by the command (word) (Greek rhema) of Elohim's
power. This should already set the alarm ringing in your head. That
Yah'ushua offered himself separately under the command of his Father
and endured it HIMSELF by Elohim's power which sustained him even while
Yahuah ELOHIM forsook him. And of course the obvious two Majesties
again show the Majestic Son as seperate, not the same, as He sits next
to
his Father, the pre-eminent Majesty on High.

4
Being made (ginomai) so much better than the malakhim (pw angels), as
he hath by inheritance
obtained a more excellent name than they.

The Son is begotten so we already know he has been made by the Father,
but
the "made" here reminds us that he is the begotten son of Elohim and
not created in the same way as his fellow malakhim (servants) (pw
angels). Hence his name he has received bears the Father Yahuah's name
-
Yah-ushua - Yah(uah) saves. By inheritance of Yahuah's name and
authority, this
Servant has thus inherited the high service above his fellows, even
unto
salvation as commanded by Yahuah. ( Jesus, on the other hand, is not a
more excellent name and bears no name of the Father Yahuah, neither
does it bear (uphold)
salvation - instead it is a syncretic name for pagans to feel at ease
with Babylonian idolatry and pagan festivals and days of J-Zeus,
J-Esus, Hey Zeus, etc. Salvation "soteria" is
nowhere in the pagan name Jesus either.)

5
For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this
day (Greek - semeron) have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him
a
Father, and he shall be to me a Son?

Shaul (Paul) is
quoting from

Psalm
2:7 I will declare the decree: YAHUAH (pw the LORD) hath said unto me
(Yah'ushua), Thou art my Son; this day (Hebrew
- yowm) have I begotten thee.

It
is very obvious that Yah-ushua has a beginning. He was begotten on a
specific "DAY", a time before the foundation of the worlds (Jn 17:24).
It stands to reason then that after Yahuah begot him he
then created the worlds for His son, as established in verse
2."Shall be"
means that an event had to begin, thus "in
the beginning" is mentioned by John 1, a day on which the
begetting of the Son took place so that the Father "shall be" a Father.
The Father does not say "I AM" A FATHER-SON without beginning or
end! Yah'ushua is not eternal backwards, not self-existent, as
even Baptists, for example, try to assert, using:

John
5:26 For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the
Son to have life in himself.

They
conveniently leave out the previous 2 verses which show that "life in
himself" is not referring to self-existence but to the resurrected
everlasting life that we all as believers will have restored to us,
that which was lost to Adam and Eve due to sin. Messiah was the first
to receive everlasting life as the Son of man, our forerunner, as the
last Adam, from
his Father, and we are promised the same:

John
5: 24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my (the Son's)
word, and believeth on him (the Father) that sent me, hath
everlasting life,
and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto
life. 25 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is
coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the SON OF ELOHIM
(pw God): and they that hear shall live.

The
verses then reiterate that he is the Son of Elohm, not Elohim, even
after
this concept of "life in himself", and then further reiterates again
that he is the Son
of Man
so that no trinitarian has any excuse to persist with his stupidity,
since we already established at the beginning that Son
of man is not Elohim!

John
5: 27 And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he
is the Son of
man.

Back to Hebrews 1

6
And again, when he bringeth in the firstbegotten into the world, he
saith, And let all the angels of Elohim (pw God) worship him.

"And
again" is here since Yahuah makes two declarations at different times.
The first and previous was when the Son was begotten in shamayim, and
this second statement is now a prophesied one of when he sends him to
the earth. Much speculation has been made as to where Shaul is quoting
from and whether it is an accurate account of his quote, since it is
not easy to
find any such verse in the Hebrew.

It is at
this point that I will refer you to "Barne's notes on the
Bible"

"In
the Septuagint these very words occur in Deuteronomy 32:43, where they
are inserted in the Song of Moses. But
they are not in the Hebrew, nor are they in all the copies of the
Septuagint.
The Hebrew is, "Rejoice, O ye nations with his people; for he will
avenge the blood of his servants, and will render vengeance to his
adversaries."

King
James renders it as in the Hebrew, however:

The
Septuagint is, "Rejoice ye heavens with him; and let all the angels of
God worship him. Let the nations rejoice with his people, and let all
the sons of God be strong in him, for he has avenged the blood of his
sons."
But there are objections to our supposing that the apostle had
this place in his view, which seem to me to settle the matter.

(1)
one is, that the passage is not in the Hebrew; and it seems hardly
credible that in writing to Hebrews, and to those residing in the very
country where the Hebrew Scriptures were constantly used, he should
adduce as a proof-text on an important doctrine what was not in their
Scriptures.

(2) a
second is, that it is omitted in all the ancient versions except the
Septuagint*.

(3)
a third is, that it is impossible to believe that the passage in
question in Deuteronomy had any reference to the Messiah. It does not
relate to his "introduction" to the world. It would not occur to any
reader that it had any such reference. The context celebrates the
victory over the enemies of Israel which God will achieve. After saying
that "his arrows would be drunk with blood, and that his sword would
devour flesh with the blood of the slain and of captives, from the time
when he began to take vengeance on an enemy," the Septuagint (not the
Hebrew) immediately asserts, "let the heavens rejoice at the same time
with him, and let all the angels of God worship him." That is, "Let the
inhabitants of the heavenly world rejoice in the victory of God over
the enemies of his people, and let them pay their adoration to him."
But the Messiah does not appear to be alluded to anywhere in the
context; much less described as "introduced into the world."

(*it has
however also been seen in the Qumran text -
http://www.biblequery.org/History/Archaeology/DeadSeaScrolls.htm)

We
fully agree that Deut 32:43 is a weak argument for a source of Shaul's
quotation in Heb 1 vs 6 and is a really a far stretch to try and make
Shaul or the scriptures appear to command direct worship to the Son by
all the "angels". In the meantime, Barne's suggests another
possible
reference:

This,
however, we find just as weak, if not more weak, if it is to explain
Messiah in the context, since the whole chapter 97 never hints of him
either. It is
all referring to LORD which is the incorrect translation but which
always correctly refers to Yahuah, with only one mention of Master
(pw Lord), which
still does not identify it as Master the Messiah. We will see though
that
it may have a clue with reference to "gods" being elohiym -
mighty
ones, etc.

So
we offer two
far more obvious background texts that the Messianic Yahudim (pw Jews)
would have been familiar with in hearing Shaul's quote or paraphrase.
Shaul would be preaching mostly from David (Psalms) at this point, as a
whole, probably due to the flow of his sentences. He would
have
perhaps said in "another place" if it were a different book other than
Psalms

Psalm Chapter
2:1 Why
do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain
thing? 2 The
kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel
together, against YHUH (pw the LORD), and against
his
anointed (mashiyach - annointed), saying,3 Let
us
break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.
4 He that sitteth in the shamayim (pw heavens) shall laugh: Adonay (the
supreme Master - YHUH, NOT Master Yah-ushua) (pw the Lord) shall have
them
in derision. 5
Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore
displeasure. 6 Yet
have I set my
king
(melek) upon my holy hill of Zion. 7
I (Yah'ushua) will declare the decree: Yahuah (pw the LORD) hath said
unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. 8 Ask
of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance,
and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. 9
Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in
pieces like a potter’s vessel. 10 Be
wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of
the earth. 11
Serve YHUH (pw the LORD) with fear, and rejoice with trembling. 12
Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his
wrath is kindled but a little. Baruch'd (pw blessed) are all they that
put their trust (confidence) in him.

This
section is undeniably
referring to Messiah and obviously not David, as some modern scholars
have recently tried to assert. This is sad and robs the lost sheep of
Israel of the truth of the Yahudi (pw Jewish) Messiah as Shaul
was preaching. David did not rule the earth. Hebrew
understanding, in fact, is, or was, that Psalm 2 is referring
to
the
Messiah, and thus, the title of
Hebrews later given to Shaul's writing is fitting. Here it becomes
clear that it is referring to
the second coming of the Son into the world since the Son is by this
stage already known or identified, and therefore has already been in
the
first coming. So now, in this second coming the kings and
rulers set themselves
up against Yahuah himself (v2) and fight against his people. The
appointed judge, Yah'ushua, will come and judge them. He then clearly
refers to the earthly judges (shaphat)( v10) or magistrates, in other
words, that they should serve YHUH or face such judgement. This is
significant since we must remember that Psalm 97 was suggested as a
quote for Shaul in which it was said, worship him all ye elohiym - this
refers to magistrates or judges (little "gods") or even malakhim (pw
"angels"), hence the variety of translations and confusion.

430
'elohiym el-o-heem' plural of 433; gods in the
ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially
with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of
deference to magistrates;
and sometimes as
a superlative:--angels,
X
exceeding, God (gods)(-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X
mighty.
see HEBREW for 0433

Perhaps it is possible that the translations for this verse have been
merged through the corruption of the Septuagint with the Hebrew
translation. I will show how corrupted the so-called "New Testament "
translation really is when we get to verse 8 of Heb 1 and compare it
with the Hebrew of the Everlasting covenant (pw Old testament). Or
perhaps Shaul is paraphrasing from a combined number of references in
Psalms.

In the
meantime, we see
that Shaul is saying, as Yahuah
brings Messiah into the world again, remembering that it is by YHUH's
own will when that will happen, unbeknownst to the Son even (1 John 3:20,
Mark
13:32),
and that
when he does it it obviously relates to the opposing judges who he
comes to judge as well as the kings since Messiah bears the name King
of Kings. We see also inheritance mentioned, as tied in with Shaul's
quote of the world given to the heir in Heb 1:2, where he receives the
heathen (pw Gentiles) children who believe. They are mentioned in verse
8 of
Psalms 2 as a possession or where the heathens are destroyed who do
not,
v9,
dashing them to pieces.

Finally, in
the last verses of Psalm 2:

11 Serve YHUH
(pw the LORD) with fear, and rejoice with trembling.
12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his
wrath is kindled but a little. Baruch'd (pw blessed) are all they that
put their trust (confidence) in him.

But
we also see the two opposite extremes of the spectrum of so-called
"worship". The word worship can easily be confused with idolatry.
Worship could be incorreclty translated or
incorrectly seen as worship when it is anything from
reverence, simple acknowledgement, giving honour, as with
honour
thy mother and father, trusting, or putting confidence in someone or
something, to calling a husband "master" as Sarah called Abraham, to
kissing with tenderness and embracing with brotherly love, to giving
homage, to bowing, to lying prostrate on the ground, to "worship"
before the feet, to fully serving with fear and trembling, etc. Idol
worship/idolatry is clealry anything that is worshipped more than
Yahuah, any
image that is made of any creation of Elohim's that is bowed to and
served as if it has or represents power or has been appointed when it
does not. Anything that
Yahuah calls an abomination or pagan is not to be done as that is false
worship, idolatry, anything
that he has not commanded as service (worship) to him. Worship involves
obedience to Yahuah, as opposed to rebellion to him which he calls
witchcraft. That which has been appointed with authority is honoured
(this word is often connected to a type of worship but it is not the
worship that is ascribed in the fullest sense when worshipping
Elohim )

So it is
clear that there is no clear command to worship Yah'ushua in
the sense of worship that has been commanded as idolatry by Yah'uah
elsewhere, He is however honoured as the appointed Son of Yahuah.

So v11 states, serve YHUH with fear. This is the
beginning of
wisdom
and it is not the beginning of foolish trinitarian heresy where Messiah
is being served with fear and trembling above Yahuah, it is ALMIGHTY
YAHUAH who receives that. This is
clearly the first commandment level of worship - with all your heart,
mind and soul, etc. Shaul calls it reasonable / expected service to
Elohim
(Rom 12:1) Then, juxtaposed against that mighty backdrop of
pre-eminince
of worship
is the command in verse 12, to kiss the Son lest he be angry. Yet,
with this simple command comes a threat to you if it be
ignored:
Messiah's wrath and your death. So Messiah is
mentioned, and so is the attitude and warning
pointed towards he who betrays the Messiah (as did Judas, with
a kiss of
falsehood rather than accceptance and tender affection.
It was
the opposite of the qodesh kiss with which the brethren are to greet
each other.) We believe it could closely be compared with the verbal
expression of the term A-mn (pw Amen), an expression or
affirmation of firmness in support.

Some
conclusions that should finally result from Ps 2 11,12:

1)This
certainly causes any idea, at least of worshiping the Son, of him being
more than or
equal to the Father, to be flushed down the toilet.
2)This
still seems to contradict what Shaul is supposedly to have quoted from
a Greek text in
Heb 1:6 And
let all the angels of Elohim (pw God) worship him.
3)This
certainly describes two separate parties - the Father who must be
served with one's whole life and being, and a Son who must be, as it
were,
"kissed", accepted as the Messiah.
4)To serve the Son with fear, and kiss, or accept the Father is clearly
not the
order here.
5)Yah'ushua fears the Father

Heb
5:7 Who in the days of his flesh, when he had offered up prayers and
supplications with strong crying and tears unto him that was able to
save him from death, and was heard in that he feared;

It
is clear that if we do not obey the Father that it is
false worship and rebellion, witchcraft or idolatry. If
Messiah the Son does not worship the Father Elohim as his own Elohim
then he is not to be kissed, he is a false Messiah, and that is the
basis of false
trinitarian "Jesus" who does away with his Father's To'rah. His Son,
Yah'ushua, does worship, fear, serve and obey the Father, as we ought.
If we do not acknowledge the exalted position of the true Son in
obedience
to the Father, that is rebellion and witchcraft - idolatry. If we
acknowledge the Son beyond the exalted position given by his Father to
a place not
appointed by the Father, then that is idolatry. The place of the Son is
not to usurp the Father - NEVER! He does not become Elohim!

Yah'ushua
worships his Father in sprit and in truth with us as He knows who He
worships, He includes himself in worshiping the Father and commands us
to as well. He does not command or advise worship of himself, the Son
or Messiah.

John
4:21 Yah'ushua saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when
ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the
Father. 22 Ye
worship ye know not what: we
know WHO* we worship: for
salvation is of the Yahudim (worshippers of Yahuah) (pw Jews). 23
But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall
worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such
to worship him. 24
Elohim is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in
spirit and in truth.

* silly
translation for Catholic idol worshippers renders it as "what we
worship" as though Yahuah is an object or graven image.
Thus the spirit and truth of Messiah is to teach worship of the Father,
not worship of the Son.
Thus we do
not worship Elohim by worshiping the Son but by esteeming
him as an obedient Son worthy of honour. And thus we obey, serve and
fear Yah'uah who says his Son has pleased him well.

Christian
teachers try to say that the "angels" (malakhim) did in fact worship
"Jesus", as
supposedly quoted by Shaul in Hebrews 1:6, when he was born, and so
fulfillied this prophecy. But they provide no scriptures. We see the
opposite.

Luk
2:9 And, lo, the malakh (pw angel) of YHUH (pw the Lord) came
upon them, and the splendour (pw glory) of YHUH (pw the Lord) shone
round about them: and they were sore afraid.

Luk
2:10 And the malakh said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I
bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.
Luk 2:11 For unto you is born this day in the city of David
a Saviour, which is Messiah the Master (pw Christ the Lord).
Luk 2:12 And this shall be a sign unto you;
Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger.
Luk 2:13 And suddenly there was with the malakh a multitude
of the shamayim (pw heavenly) host PRAISING ELOHIM
(pw God), and saying,
Luk 2:14 SPLENDOUR TO ELOHIM in the highest, and on earth shalom (pw
peace), good will toward men.

So they worship Elohim.

Thus
far we still have not seen Shaul's quote being confirmed anywhere in
the "Old Testament". But let's look at our second background scripture,
Psalm 138, a
short psalm but not as clear about the Messiah at first glance.
However,
on careful inspection we see it to be prophetic about the fact that
Yahuah's covenant is everlasting for those that keep covenant with him
and keep his commands, and that there will be redemption from past sins
as promised.

Psa
103:1 A Psalm of David. baw'rak (pw bless) YHUH (pw LORD), O
my
soul: and all that is within me, baw'rak (pw bless) his qodesh (pw
holy) name.
2 Baw'rak (pw bless) YHUH (pw LORD), O my soul, and forget
not all his benefits:
3 Who
forgiveth all thine iniquities; who healeth all thy diseases;
4 Who
redeemeth thy life from destruction; who crowneth thee
with lovingkindness and tender mercies;
5 Who satisfieth thy mouth with good things; so that thy youth is renewed like
the eagle's.
6 YHUH (pw LORD) executeth righteousness and judgment for all
that are oppressed.
7 He made known his ways unto Moses, his acts unto the
children of Israel.
8
YHUH (pw LORD) is compassionate (pw merciful) and channuwn - kind ( pw
gracious), slow to anger, and plenteous in compassion (pw mercy).
9 He will not always chide: neither will he keep his anger
for ever.
10 He hath not dealt with us after our sins; nor rewarded us
according to our iniquities.
11 For as the shamayim (pw heaven) is high above the earth,
so great is his mercy toward them that fear him.
12 As far as the east is from the west, so far hath he
removed our transgressions from us.
13 Like as a father pitieth his children, so YHUH (pw LORD)
pitieth them that fear him.
14 For he knoweth our frame; he remembereth that we are dust.
15 As for man, his days are as grass: as a flower of the
field, so he flourisheth.
16 For the wind passeth over it, and it is gone; and the
place thereof shall know it no more.
17 But
the mercy of YHUH (pw LORD) is from everlasting to everlasting upon
them that fear him, and his righteousness unto children's children;
18 To
such as keep his covenant, and to those that remember his commandments
to do them. 19
YHUH (pw LORD) hath prepared his throne in the heavens; and his kingdom
ruleth over all. 20
Baw'rak (pw bless) YHUH (pw LORD), ye his angels, that excel in
strength, that do his commandments, hearkening unto the
voice of his word. 21
Baw'rak (pw bless) ye YHUH (pw LORD), all ye his hosts; ye ministers of
his, that do his pleasure. 22
Baw'rak (pw bless) YHUH (pw LORD), all his works in all places of his
dominion: baw'rak (pw bless) YHUH (pw LORD), O my soul.

Here
it becomes clear as to what Shaul is paraphrasing. Here we have the
first possible evidence as in the Hebrew text of malakhim (pw angels)
giving worship,
yet here again they are worshipping Yahuah concerning his
healing,
redemption and forgiveness vs 3,4. It mentions that Yahuah has prepared
the kindgom and throne. The throne for who? Himself? No, he has existed
for eternity. It is for Messiah to sit at his right hand and his
appointed kingdom to rule over. Thus Messiah is brought
(introduced) into the world (his kingdom) to rule over until his second
coming. At first it does not seem obvious where but I will show you

vs
21 ..hearkening unto the voice of his word.

Here
the Word made flesh, the voice of Yahuah, is introduced, and what more
could we expect since Shaul's teaching began with how Yahuah has spoken in
time past

Heb 1:1
...unto the fathers by the prophets, 2 Hath in these last
days spoken unto us by his Son

The phrase, "voice of his word" (qowl dabar) is unique and nowhere else
appears in the scriptures, as far as I can see! The Word made
flesh, Yah'ushua, who
delivers the word (To'rah) from his lips.

Consider how Shaul highlights later that Israel did not want to hear
Yahuah's voice

Heb
12:18 For ye are not come unto the mount that might be
touched,
and that burned with fire, nor unto blackness, and darkness, and
tempest, 19
And the sound of a trumpet, and the voice of words;
which voice they that heard intreated that the word should not be
spoken to them any more:

And
still on the theme, that Messiah "speaks" better things than Abel,
blood that condemned is
replaced by his own blood that redeems in the renewed covenant for
those that hear Yahuah's commandments from shamayim, spoken through the
Son to them. and those who do them.

Heb
12:24 And to Yah'ushua
the mediator of the regenerated
(renewed)
(bad translation - new) covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that
speaketh better things than that of Abel. 25 See that ye
refuse
not him that speaketh. For if they escaped not who refused
him that spake on earth
(Moses), much more shall not WE escape, if we turn away from him that
speaketh from shamayim (pw heaven):

The
renewing youth like an eagle, Ps 103 vs 5, suggests the connection to
the
renewing of his covenant. and strength to overcome sin and the
world again.
That Yahuah must be baw'rak'd
(pw blessed) is commanded to his malakhim (pw angels), which
is actually men, messengers or ambassadors of Yahuah (2 Cor 5:20).
Messiah is such
an ambassador himself, but as Shaul has already indicated, higher than
the malakhim of shamayim, the hosts of shamayim. The "ye ministers of
his" vs 130:21 ties in exactly with Shaul in his very next verse

Heb
1:7 And of the malakhim (pw angels) he saith, Who maketh his malakhim
(pw angels) spirits, and his ministers a
flame of fire.

However, Psalm 104 is the direct reference for this quotation made by
Shaul:

It
is obvious now how Psalm 103 flows into Psalm 104 as they both carry
the theme of beginning with, Barak Yahuah oh my soul, and both
ending with a similar phrase. It is no wonder since we have no
doubt that Psalm 103 is thus where Shaul is quoting from in verse 6.
However, we still did not see any reference to worshipping
Yah'ushua
but instead to Baw'rak or praise Yahuah. If Psalm 104 is anything to go
by, Shaul is confirming that Yahuah gives life to all, including his
Son,
by his spirit.

Is Shaul saying the malakhim (pw angels) must really worship the Son?
Let's look again at what the translation claims Shaul had said.

6 And again,
when he bringeth in the firstbegotten into the world, he saith, And let
all the malakhim (pw angels) of Elohim (pw God) worship him

Even
in the claimed Greek Septuagint reference there is no such mention that
Yahushua is receiving worship. Moses's Song would be saying that all
the mighty ones of Elohim must worship him, Elohim, himself. There is
no
intimation for them to worship somebody else. In fact, it has just
warned
them against that very thing a few verses prior

Would it not be sweet for satan and his devils to insert
or add such an idea into scripture right after such a warning from
Yahuah against
it? To create the worship of a new mighty one called "Jesus" / J-Zeus /
J-Esus, who they
knew not.

Now, what was the purpose of Shaul's lesson to the
Messianics? He was preaching from Psalms to confirm the Messiah's
position and rank as High Priest, his beginning, his being
created (begotten), his position higher than malakhim (pw angels) and
the honour that should be given him, but never his worship as Elohim.
Quite the
contrary since Jews were connected to angel worship and
superstitious practices which scripture denounces. So why are we
presented with Shaul saying something else? It is simply
corrupted translation which gets more diabolical, as you will see.

6
And
again, when he bringeth in the firstbegotten into the
world, he saith, And let all the mighty ones (elohiym) of
Elohim (pw God) worship him

pal'-in
Probably
from the same as G3823 (through the idea of oscillatory repetition);
(adverbially) anew, that is, (of place) back, (of time) once more, or
(conjugationally) furthermore or on the other hand:
- again.

"Again"
would not fit since the first begotten is being brought into the world
for the first time here, not "again", and neither is this
statement "again" as if it had been said before.

So
we have Shaul possibly rather saying But
on the other hand as though
clearly putting an end to the idea that because the Son
rightfully has such pre-eminence
now above the malakhim "angels" and is called a Son, that the next step
might be to
wrongfully think Elohim expects him to be equally worshipped or
worshipped in his place. Well, is that not the very
challlenge that the Son had himself when he was accused of being equal
to Elohim, ie. a wrong perception that he siezes equal worship as the
Sovereign simply because he said he was the Son
of Elohim (We
cover this False Accusation further on- click if you wish to go there
now on a separate page ).
Shaul is saying, contrary to what might be thought now, that the Son's
existence automatically demands MORE worship going to the Father by his
act of bringing him into the world. So "on the other hand" Shaul is
saying,
contrary to popular pagan belief and thought, the realisation is that
the Messiah broadcasts the splendour, love, power, etc. of his Father
to
the whole earth. There should be no fear of a Messiah who is an idol
but He is the Son who strengthens the Shema just as "saviour" Moshe
(Moses) did but with lesser splendour see Hebrews 3:1-6.

vs
3 For this man was counted worthy of more splendour (pw
glory)
than Moses, inasmuch as he who hath builded the house hath more honour
than the house.

16
For ELOHIM so loved
the world, that HE
GAVE HIS ONLY BEGOTTEN SON, that
whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting
life. 17
For ELOHIM sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but
that the world through
him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him
is not condemned (it is not idolatry since he brings splendour to the
Father): but he that believeth not is condemned already,
because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of
ELOHIM.19
And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and
men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20
For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the
light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21
But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made
manifest, that they are WROUGHT IN ELOHIM (not the Son).

The
whole earth (heathens) now may learn of Yahuah and his kindness to
redeem
all who will repent by sending his Son, and those that do praise
Yahuah. The final help comes when we realise who is speaking here

6 But on the
other hand, when he (Yahuah) bringeth in the firstbegotten
into the world, he
saith, And let all the angels of God worship him

We have already seen in Luke 2:13,14 that all the malakhim (pw angels),
the whole host in shamayim (pw heaven) certainly praise and
give
splendour to Elohim in the highest when the Son is announced to the
world. So it is simple to see that Yahuah Elohim is saying
prophetically that they should fully worship He, himself, and not the
firstbegotten. So no matter where this quote is from that Shaul uses it
has been twisted to contradict how the prophetic worship of malakhim
(pw
angels) would occur when his Son was indeed brought into the
world. They worshipped the Father Elohim on the highest,
not the Son.

We then move to the next Psalm which we believe has significance
against the idea that Shaul is focussing on a so-called "Son worship"
as if He be Elohim.

Psalm
138:
1 A Psalm of David. I will praise thee with
my whole heart:
before the mighty ones (pw gods) will I sing praise unto thee.
2
I will worship toward thy holy temple, and praise thy name for thy
lovingkindness and for thy truth: for thou hast magnified thy word
above all thy name.
3 In the day when I cried thou answeredst me, and
strengthenedst me with strength in my soul.
4 All the kings of the earth shall praise thee, O LORD, when
they hear the words of thy mouth.
5 Yea, they shall sing in the ways of the LORD: for great is
the glory of the LORD.
6 Though the LORD be high, yet hath he respect unto the
lowly: but the proud he knoweth afar off.
7
Though I walk in the midst of trouble, thou wilt revive me: thou shalt
stretch forth thine hand against the wrath of mine enemies, and thy
right hand shall save me.
8 The LORD will perfect that which
concerneth me: thy mercy, O LORD, endureth for ever: forsake not the
works of thine own hands.

Heb
1:7 And of the angels he saith, Who maketh his angels spirits, and his
ministers a flame of fire.

The
first question is, who are the ministers? Yah'ushua is among these
ministers but he is THE Minister of all, the very High Priest
ministeriing in
the House (pw Temple) of Yahuah in shamayim (pw heaven). The question
is, who is his
source? And the rhetorical quesiton is answered - Yahuah, the Creator
of
the begotten Son of course. Ministers of Yahuah are not "gods" to be
worshipped but rather servants of Yahuah.

Heb1:
8 But unto (Greek "pros") the Son [he saith], Thy throne, O Elohim (pw
God), is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre
of thy kingdom.

The word here is not "unto" as if
David is addressing the Son here, he is adressing Elohim. Shaul is
quoting directly from Psalm 45:6

4314 pros pros a strengthened
form of 4253; a preposition of direction; forward to, i.e. toward (with
the genitive case, the side of, i.e. pertaining
to;
with the dative case, by the side of, i.e. near to; usually with the
accusative case, the place, time, occasion, or respect, which is the
destination of the relation, i.e. whither or for which it is
predicated):--about, according to , against, among, at, because of,
before, between, (where-)by, for, X at thy house, in, for intent, nigh
unto, of, which pertain to, that, to (the end that), X together, to
(you) -ward, unto, with(-in). In the comparative case, it denotes
essentially the same applications, namely, motion towards, accession
to, or nearness at. see GREEK for 4253

The words "he saith" are not even there in the original and
have been added, further corrupting the scripture.

It should be

But
pertaining to the Son, Thy throne O Elohim is for ever and ever a
sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.

So
David is addressing Elohim
but he speaks to him with
reference to (pertaining to) the Son that is in Elohim's hand, whom He
has created
and sent. The Son is indeed
the very sceptre of righteousness that is in his hand (on the
right hand of the
Majesty on high). The Son shows that the righteous Kingdom of Yahuah is
so
Sovereign that Elohim even would forsake his own Son because of our
sin,
that his Son took upon himself. But Elohim, equally, so hated iniquity
that He would raise his Son, as promised, to overcome sin and death -
this is the true sceptre
of righteousness: it is Shiloh the Messiah prophesied already in
Genesis that woulld gather his people to Elohim's throne.

Gen
49:10 The sceptre shall not depart from Yahudha (Judah), nor a lawgiver
from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the
gathering of the people be.

Shaul then confirms that David prophesies of Yah'ushua,
that he indeed fulfills the definition of the prophesied
sceptre
of righteousness since Messiah too has loved righteousness,
fully preaching (pleroo) the law (To'rah) whilst also offering his body
as atonement for us to keep his To'rah in the future
(establish the
To'rah as Shaul says Rom 3:31). Yah'ushua hated iniquity
so much that he overcame it with good, giving his own body as
atonement. (Rom 12:21 Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with
good.) Thus as the sceptre of righteousness he has been appointed as
judge by his Father. It is unequivocally evident that Shaul reminds his
audience that David is not a trinitarian, David prophesies that the
annointed and appointed King Yahu'shua has an Elohim, just as an
earthly king like himself is under Elohim - He does not become Elohim,
He is
not called Elohim. The verse is not addressing Yah'ushua here as "God"
and then saying He has a "God", that is ridiculous. The original verse
from Psalms 45:7 does not have "even" added, it is simply

"therefore
God thy God hath annointed thee"

Heb
1:10 And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the
foundation
of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands:

Continuing
here with the idea of hands, Yahuah is the Soverein who upholds the
sceptre (Yah'ushua) in his hand. We recall earlier how we said Yah'uah
is the upholder of all things, not Yah'ushua. Yah'ushua, however, bears
all things
appointed to him. Yah'uah is the Creator of all things, the very
foundation He created is an extension of his upholding power, which
literally and physically upholds us upon the earth. However, we willl
have trinitarian Christians telling us that "Jesus / J-Zesus
is
the Creator. Consider the servant Moses who was given splendour (pw
glory)in his "house" congregation of beleivers, however the greater
splendour is given to the builder of the house. Yah'ushua is the buider
of the living stones, we his congregation. But finally the greatest
splendour is given to Elohim the creator of ALL THINGS, US MOSES AND
HIS SON. Shaul cannot make it any clearer that the highest honour is
given to Elohim and Yah'ushua does not replace or take that from him.
See Heb 3:1-6.

Confusion is made possible by the use of "Lord" in Heb 1:10.

LORD, Lord - Its all
Greek to me.

In
the Everlasting Covenant (pw Old testament) of KJV and others, the
translators replaced the word, Master, with, Lord. They also replaced
YHUH
(Yahuah) with LORD. This creates enough deception and confusion
already. "YHUH", "Yahuah" corrupted to LORD was done over 7000 times in
the "OT". Then the translators had a further field day in promoting the
trinity doctrine even further when it came to the Renewed
Everlasting Covenant (pw New Testament) translated from the Greek. Here
they go further to ignorantly (or deceptively) translate Lord for
Master, which could refer to Yahuah or the Son. One is totally
confused. They then corrupt "Yahuah / YHUH" into "Lord" as well. This
then is even worse than the Everlasting Covenant (OT), having not even
a
distinction between "LORD" in uppercase and "Lord" capitalised, which
would at least clearly distinguish it as referring to YHUH, Yah'ushua
or
Master.

Were
it not for quotes by Yah'ushua and the apostles themselves quoting from
the Everlasting Covenant (OT) we would not be able to pick up on their
shenanigans, but they are clearly exposed and shamed. However, many
still
fall prey to their trickery, sadly even sisters of the harlot "church",
Baptists, for example, who use such verses as proof of their trinity
heresy that "Jesus is God", or as they put it, where "Jesus is
recognized as God"

We
see that as we continue all the way to verse 13, nothing has
changed. It is still Yah'uah Elohim who is being spoken of here as the
Creator

Heb
1: 11
They shall perish; but thou remainest; and they all shall wax old as
doth a garment; 12
And as a vesture shalt thou fold them up, and they shall be changed:
but thou art the same, and thy years shall not fail. 13
But to which of the angels said he at any time, Sit on my right hand,
until I make thine enemies thy footstool? 14
Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them
who shall be heirs of salvation?

it is Elohim who tells Messiah to sit at his right hand, thus it is
Yahuah who is the Creator spoken of here.

The
original verse Shaul is quoting from is from Psalm 102, a prayer, which
begins as

Hear my
prayer oh Yahuah (pw LORD)

It is unmistakenly an address to YHUH, Yahuah Elohim, where the pagan
translators exchange YHUH with L-O-R-D

Jumping
down to verse 12:

Psalm 102:12
But thou O LORD shalt endure for ever

still referring to YHUH, not Yah'ushua. When we get to verse 25 we
finally have the rest of Shaul's matching
quote:

Ps 102
25 Of old hast thou laid the foundation of the earth: and the heavens
are the work of thy hands. 26
They shall perish, but thou shalt endure: yea, all of them shall wax
old like a garment; as a vesture shalt thou change them, and they shall
be changed:27
But thou art the same, and thy years shall have no end.

It
is obvious that Shaul thus quoted from verse 12 here and then verse 25,
as one would do
when shortening a quote using "...", but in Hebrew text elipsis is not
used. Shaul clearly did this to make sure we know who is being adressed
so that there is no
mistake that it is Yahuah, YHUH (pw LORD). But of course the
trinitarians
then try to hide Shaul's clear presentation and they translate
it with the deceptive "Lord" which enables trinitarians to say, oh,
look,
Jesus our Lord is Creator. Total deception, total Catholic rubbish.

Finally, our conclusion of Hebrews 1 with corrected
translation as well as explanations in brackets:

1 Elohim (pw
God), who at
sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers
by the prophets,2
hath in
these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir
of all things,
for whom also he made/ gave
the worlds; 3 Who
being the brightness of his (Elohim's)
honour (pw glory), and the express image of his person (Elohim's
nature), and
bearing /
enduring all things by the word of his (Elohim's) power,
when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of
the Majesty on high (Elohim);4
Being made so much better than the malakhim (pw angels), as
he hath by inheritance
obtained (from the Father) a more excellent name than they (a name
which contains the Father's appointed authority, and his name Yah as in
Yah'ushua)5
For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this
day
have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him
a
Father, and he shall be to me a Son? 6 but on the other hand
when he (Yah'uah) bringeth in the firstbegotten (Yah'ushua)
into the world, he (David)
saith, And let all the malakhim (pw angels) of Elohim (pw God) worship
him(Elohim)7 And
of the malakhim (pw angels) he saith, Who maketh his angels spirits,
and his ministers a flame of fire. 8But
pertaining to the Son, Thy throne O Elohim
is for ever and ever a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy
kingdom.9
Thou (Yah'ushua) hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity;
therefore Elohim (pw God), THY
Elohim (pw God), hath anointed
thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.

Trinity - A New Revelation?

The book of Revelations was written
much later and is the last words of scripture. This book is often
titled
"the
Revelation of Jesus" and it is no wonder that the trinitarians try to
create an idea as
if Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) is being revealed to John finally in
his
fullness as Elohim (pw God) after allegedly being a secret or
mystery prior to that. I have indeed heard such an
idea being taught. This far-fetched idea would
make all the apostles liars and in the dark as far as true
witnesses then. They had to witness Messiah first-hand and they
declared him
as the Son of Elohim and never Elohim. Messiah as the light (true
witness) to Paul also then would not be the blinding light of truth, if
htis were the case, that knocked him to the ground, but, instead,
some dark or obscure light.

But the light was not hid under a bed, it was openly revealed:

John
8: 19 The high priest then asked Yah'ushua of his disciples,
and of
his doctrine . 20 Yah'ushua answered him, I spake openly to the world;
I ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews
always resort; and in
secret have I said nothing

Secondly,
this idea of no prior revelation would not make sense
since that argument defeats itself since these same trinitarians will
still try to use prior scriptures to the book of Revelations claiming
that they
are "clear" evidence of such a known revelation that "Jesus is
God", eg. Thomas "my Lord and my God" just discussed. The Father
himself, however, already revealed (gave
revelation) to Simon Peter by his pure breath (pw holy spirit) for
example:

Mat
16:15 "He (Yah'suhua) saith unto
them, But whom say ye
that I am? 16 And
Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Messiah,
the SON OF the
living Elohim (pw God). 17
And Yah'ushua answered and said unto him,
baruch'd (pw blessed) art thou, Simon Bar–jona: for
flesh and blood
hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is
in shamayim (pw heaven)."

It is more than ironic then that the Vatican would create a fake
Peter Pope
(Papa, Father ) imposter who stands for the very opposite, that "Jesus
is
God". But the true revelation to the real Apostle Simon Peter in
Mat 16:15 precedes John's revelation. The revelation is the same and
the source is the same: that Yah'ushua is the Son of Elohim and that
his
Father, Yahuah in shamayim is the one who has thus declared it. So any
different revelation only means a different father, and that revelation
is the so-called later trinity revelation from the fake Papa
Pope,
so-called Father on earth. Yes, they present a
corrupted revelation
revealed by flesh and blood, a doctrine of the
fleshly puffed up swollen heads of theological (g-o-d following) church
(circe goddess - circus) fathers.

So if a trinity was supposedly not revealed prior to
the book of Revelations then a trinitarian cannot use those prior
scriptures to prove any trinty before a supposed later revelation to
John, otherwise such scriptures surely would
have clearly revealed a trinity to those who were direct
eyewitness of
the Messiah - the very Apostles themselves. No such thing happened. He
was revealed by the Father himself as the SON OF THE LIVING ELOHIM! The
trinitarian cannot have his
cake
and eat it.

Seeing Dimly Or Just being Dull
Of Hearing?

When Paul says

1
Cor 13:12
For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I
know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.

then
they may be quick to believe it supportts that idea that Paul and his
fellows were
seeing "Jesus" dimly and not yet as Elohim (pw God), as though later
revelation was
needed to see that Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) is Elohim (pw God).
This, however, is not true. It merely refers to knowing
Yahuah face to face, ie. His visible form. It does not refer to not
knowing his character and who He is, perhaps a Jesus or some silly
masquerade idea. Paul's statement is echoed by John and there it is
clear that we
do already know Him. It is the world that did not know Him.

1
Jn 3:1
Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we
should be called the sons of Elohim (pw God): therefore the world
knoweth us not,
because it knew him not. 2 Beloved, now are we the
sons of Elohim (pw God), and it doth not yet appear what we shall be:
but we know that,
when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he
is.

We shall know His form and appearance as we
know our own. Note also that this happens after resurrection. This
revelation then does not happen with the book of revelations and
neither does it happen upon this earth. So, again,
this is the revelation of Yahuah's appearance and not the fabled
later revelation that "Jesus is God".

Alpha
and Omega

Who is the Alpha and Omega, Beginning and End, First and Last? Let's
have a look.
We
see the use of "Alpha and Omega, begining and end" four
times,
and
all only in Revelations. There may have been confusion for many of us
at one
time or another as to who the
Alpha and Omega is, and this title is often incorrectly used as proof
of
Yah'ushua
and Elohim being one and the same. Again there may be a temptation to
believe this is a later revelation revealed to John. We shall cover the
four references.

1) Rev
1:10 I was in the Spirit ( Ruach, breathe of Yahuah) on the Master's
(pw Lord) day*, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a
trumpet, 11
Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last...vs12 And I
turned to see the voice that spake with me. And being turned, I saw
seven golden candlesticks; 13 And in the midst of
the seven
candlesticks one like unto the Son of man ..."

*More likely, Day of Yahuah, the day (period) of Yahuah's
judgement at the end, ie. Judgement Day. It is
a vision of that day. It is not a Sunday or Sabbath day
that Yahuchanon is referring to.

In this very first reference Yahuchanon (corrupted name: John) tells
us who the Alpha and Omega is here. It is the Son of man. So there is
no
mistake that this
is Yah'ushua and not Elohim Yah'uah.

2) Rev
1:8 "I am Aleph (Alpha)
and Tau (Omega), the
beginning and the ending, saith the supreme Master (pw Lord), which is,
and which was, and
which is to come, the Almighty*."

Now
in
this verse we see this word Almighty*. In the renewed
everlasting covenant (falsely called New Testament)
scriptures it is only
present in Revelations (8 times) besides once in 2
Corinthians.

[*StrongsGreek*]
3841
pantokrator pan-tok-rat'-ore from 3956 and 2904; the all-ruling, i.e.
God (as absolute and universal sovereign):--Almighty, Omnipotent. see
GREEK for 3956 see GREEK for 2904

It
is clear that this is the All Mighty One, Elohim,
"pantokrator"
This would perhaps be a better word for that troublesome Roman Vulgate
invention "theotes" - Godhead or would at least make a clearer
definition of Yahuah as the Sovereign, Absolute, Omnipotent,
All Ruling One.

So
now we have two Alpha and Omegas, but is this possible? The
trinitarians immediately would declare:

Of
course since they are one
and the same They thus try to make us believe 2=1. What about
3=1? Their other so-called "god" the
"holi ghost" is missing at this stage once again!

Whilst
two parties may share a similar or same description, it in no
way
follows that they are one and the same. Considering
further
that Alpha and Omega on its own does not necessarily define
sovereignty or eternity backwards and forwards it merely
defines a
starting point and an end in the dimension of time. The Almighty,
however, does
not have a starting point but he chooses to do whatever he likes and
appoints a starting point or an end point according His own will here
on Earth. The
Almighty is
eternal backwards and forwards but when He created time he was
obviously there at its beginning, thus from creation's point
of
view he was
its beginning and he is its end when the Earth and shamayim are
destroyed and replaced. We shall see this context soon in this section.
However, He is not bound by time or the events
of creation, neither its destruction, since he supersedes those
dimensions. It
is clear that this descriptive name, Alpha and Omega, in John 1:8 is
for
Yahuah this time but obtains seperate ownership from that
applied
to Yah'ushua in John 1:10 by the additional
use this time of "who was, who
is and which is to come, the Almighty".
This clearly distinguishes him from the other Alpha and Omega who is
Yah'ushua, who was merely first and
last from his time of
being
begotten forwards, including when he became the last
Adam ("the
first
begotten of the dead "- see Rev 1:5, 1 Cor 15:45),
resurrected and then
made eternal by Yahuah.

3) John 21:6"I
am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him
that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely."

In
this third instance we may be tempted to assume this is now the Messiahwho
we are accustomed to know as the "water of life". However, the source
of
that life is Yahuah and it does not take more than a verse later to see
who is talking, it is the very source:

John 21:7 "He
that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his Elohim
(God), and he shall be my son."

Immediately
after Elohim we see "son" is mentioned. He thus reminds us
that
he is the Father, the source
here, he is the beginning of the Son and the beginning of us who shall
be Sons of
Elohim, by inheritance through his Son who is our beginning, Alpha (our
forerunner of emunah (pw faith)).

So the
picture is becoming clearer
again as
to why the Alpha and Omega names are being used back and forth for the
Son and the Father, but each time with a clearer understanding of their
context, their action, their function, their rank. This is what Hebrew
names are all about. The name has purpose and meaning. It is not a
transliteration without scriptural meaning (like the awful
meaningless transliteration
J-E-S-U-S which DOES NOT mean saviour as theologians have tried to
force.
If it were so "soter" would be part of the name since "soter" means
saviour -
II Peter 3:18 "our Master (pw Lord) and Saviour (soter) Jesus (no
soter) Messiah (pw Christ)."
The
true Hebrew meanings on the other hand explain the
seperate
rank and function of the Son and the Father while maintaining unity of
purpose and thusthey share the name
Alpha and Omega.

Let us go back in the passage for even more context.

John
21:1 And I saw a new shamayim (pw heaven) and a new earth: for the
first shamayim (pw heaven) and
the first earth were passed away; and there was no more
sea. 2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem,
coming
down from Elohim
out of shamayim (pw heaven), prepared as a bride adorned for her
husband. 3 And I heard a great voice out of
shamayim (pw heaven)
saying,
Behold, the tabernacle of Elohim is with men, and he will dwell with them,
and they shall be his people, and Elohim HIMSELF
shall be
with them, and
be their Elohim.

Here
it becomes obvious again that Elohim HIMSELF
will dwell with his people, something that has not happened before
since
his Son has told us no man has seen or even heard Elohim, save the
first
begotten Son of Elohim.This
then further
qualifies the Father as another beginning for us in the new shamayim(
pw heaven)
and the new earth created for us, and a new beginning, being with us,
dwelling with him for the FIRST (ALPHA) TIME ever.

This
then brings us to the name Emmanuel - El is with us. Here Elohim is
truly Emmanuel, here the consummation, goal, full realisation of that
name is made by the Son
who was given that name as a memorial to his function to make this
happen for Yahuah's honour (pw glory). We see descriptive names given
throughout scripture
to various people in the scriptures which prophetically point to a
future event or describe something that Yahuah is highlighting at the
time.

Now
that we have established shamayim (pw heaven) as a keyword relating to
Alpha and
Omega for Elohim, here, lets see the final verse:

4) Rev 22:13
I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and
the last. 14 Baruch'd (pw blessed) are they that do
his
commandments,
that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through
the gates into the city

Here
we know that it is Messiah Yah'ushua speaking since he refers to "His"
commandments and not "my" commandments thus making it clear that he
keeps the Father's commandments (To'rah) as we are commanded to (John
15:10). A
couple of verses later
reveals it is, indeed, Yah'ushua.

Rev
22:16 " I Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) have sent mine malakh (pw angel)
to testify unto you
these things in the assemblies (pw churches) I am the
root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning
star.

He
mentions his fleshly end, last Adam (Omega) again as offspring of David
but also
reminds us that he is David's root (Alpha) in the flesh. We know that
the foundation (idea / conception) of his flesh being slain was already
from the foundation (idea / conception) of the world, the
beginning of our
or creation's time (alpha-omega period of the current earth and
shamayim (pw heaven)).

Rev
13:8 ...the Lamb
slain from the
foundation of the world."

So,
to summarise, Messiah is first mentioned as Alpha and Omega, and then
Elohim twice, finishing with Messiah at the closure of the
scriptures, ie. literally these are His final words from Yahuah to us.

So we see that Messiah Yah'ushua the son is the Alpha and
Omega beginning and end of the things of this earth, as appointed to by
his Father. Yahuah too is the
beginning BUT of ALL creation including his own son and the end of the
earth when he makes a new earth. Thus
the rank of the Son and
purpose was and is to do his Father's will on Earth, ie. be the Alpha
and
Omega
upon Earth, to be the "causer" of Emmanuel (Elohim with us) so that
Yahuah the Alpha and
Omega can be the true Emmanuel, Elohim with us, in the new earth and
new
shamayim, the all in all (see 1 Cor 15:28 again).

Luke 11:2 And he (Yah'ushua said
unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in
shamayim (pw heaven), purified (pw hallowed) be thy name.
Thy rule and reign (pw kingdom) come. Thy will be done, as in
shamayim, so in earth.

Messiah
prays that he himself may be Alpha and Omega (the beginning and end of
the goal
or will of Yahuah) on Earth as appointed, and that Yahuah be
Alpha and Omega, starter and finisher of his overarching will
in
shamayim,and that their two purposes will be one and the
same in
unity. In this way the descriptive Alpha and Omega is shared by both
the roles of the Father and the Son.

Conclusion

Yahuah, as well as Yah'ushua, are the Alpha and Omega, Aleph and Tau,
the first
and last letter of the Hebrew alphabet. Hence we see
them both described throughout Psalms 119, the longest Psalm, broken up
into 21 segments corresponding to the Hebrew Alphabets, Aleph to Tau.
Although Messiah and Yah'ushua are not described
specifically as
Aleph and Tau within Psalm 119, they are each Aleph and Tau
as
revealed in Revelations.

Both are the beginnings of different things: Yahuah is the
source, beginning of the Word making up To'rah and creation.
Messiah is the beginning of the ultimate witness or declaration of
the Word, for which he was willing to die for- the
causer (beginner) and ender (consummater) of our emunah (pw faith) as
we respond to the Word of life. Two beginnings: Yahuah began life in
his Son, His Son's life began to conquer death.

Alpha and
Omega being used interchangeably between the Son Yah'ushua (Son of Man)
and the Father Yahuah can only be falsely used by trinitarians to mean
they are one and the same holders of that name (Jesus=God fallacy).
This would be as ridiculous as saying the two Simons in the scriptures
are the same merely because they hold the same name whilst
ignoring the different context and character of each. Secondly, these
names, Aleph and Tau, are descriptive titles only and not names in any
case. They represent domains, two different domains.

Messiah the created Alpha and Omega points to (shows) his eternal
Father the Alpha and Omega of creation to which Yahuah gave a beginning
and an end:

1
Tim 6:14 That thou keep this commandment without spot, unrebukeable,
until the appearing of our Master Messiah
Yah'ushua: 15
Which in his times [from his Aleph and Omega, begining to end period]
he shall
show, who is the baruch'd (pw blessed) and ONLY Potentate (pw
Godhead - theotes), the King of kings, and
Master of masters (including over Master Yah'ushua)
; 16
Who ONLY hath immortality
[ie. Yahuah's Aleph and Omega time - forwards and backwards], dwelling
in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor
can see: to whom be honour
and power everlasting. Amein. (pw amen)."

Yahuah and Yah'ushua: Equal or Same?

Philippians
2:5 "Let
this mind be in you, which was also in Messiah (pw Christ) Yah'ushua
(pw Jesus) : 6 Who,
being in the form of Elohim (pw God), thought it not robbery to be
equal with Elohim (pw God): 7 But
made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant,
and was made in the likeness of men: 8And being found in fashion as a man, he
humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the
torture stake (greek stauros)( pw cross). 9Wherefore Elohim (pw God) also hath highly
exalted him, and given him a name which is above
every name: 10That
at the name of Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) every knee should bow, of
things in shamayim (pw heaven), and
things in earth, and things under the earth; 11And that every tongue should confess that
Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) Messiah (pw Christ) is Master (pw Lord),
to
the splendour (pw glory) of Elohim (pw God) the Father."

Once
again Verse 6 refers to the time when Yah'ushua was "Logos"
with Elohim (pw God), a part of YHUH at that time. Yah'ushua
then
lowered Himself to become flesh for our salvation, so, subsequently He
is
no longer equal with YHUH. If He were he would not be handing over all
honour (pw glory) to the Father at the very end.

Scriptures have rendered this verse as
"to
be equal with God" . Now, the name Michael has the Hebrew meaning :for
"who is
like Elohim (pw God)" We see that Sethur in the Old
Testament was the Son of Michael.
So, was this a blasphemy? A mere mortal with a name, "who is
like
El(ohim)". How can it be? Let's say your name were Michael,
perhaps it is - well, would that, in the strictest sense, be a kind of
blasphemy? Perhaps if you were not
behaving as Elohim that would be using that name in vain since you did
not live up to it. That would be robbery, misrepresentation, abuse of
power or fraud, in the Hebrew sense, when it comes to a name.

The straightforward answer then is,
that this is
not blasphemy or robbery to be equal with Elohim when it comes to
Messiah himself
since He lived up to the name of his Father. In so doing He has come
as an example for us all to be Michael, like El (pw God) IN
CHARACTER. What does that badly translated
word “godly” or “godliness” mean? The whole of christianity reads it
but IGNORES IT. They insist that their pagan word "god" means the
Almighty of the scriptures but reject it as being the very nature of
Elohim when it is written "godliness" by their own corrupted
translators. There is no
replacement for it. Paul uses this word and it can
only mean
to be YHUH-like. Is it robbery of Elohim's very throne
and
sovereign power, or is it his goal and will for us, to be like him in
nature, righteous? It is of course the latter since Satan rejects the
latter in
favour of trying to gain the former. To be equal with Elohim is not
to obtain his position
which consists of his sovereignty, omniscience, self-existence,
omnipotence, no it is to have his character of righteousness.
As
you will remember Satan tempted Yah'ushua not with offering him the
power to have the righteous character of Elohim (pw God), no, but
offered him the position
to rule over an earthly reign ( pw kingdom) at the expense of
unrighteous worship
of Satan himself.

Apostle
Paul defines the mystery of Yah-likeness ( pw "godliness").

1 Tim 3:16 And without controversy
great is the mystery of godliness: which was manifest in the
flesh,
justified in the Spirit, seen of malakhim (pw angels) , preached unto
the Gentiles,
believed on in the world, received up into honour (pw glory).

So "godliness" /
piety, being morally set apart from the ways of the world
- pure humility as manifest in Yah'ushua who was humble enough to
obey the Father
unto pureness (pw holiness). This is why we do not see it
robbery to be like the Father in purity and be obedient to Him. This is
not SELF-RIGHTEOUSNESS but HIS righteousness that we follow by the
power of his spirit. It
was the Father too who was humble and stooped down to us by giving His
Son
so that we may repent and have our sins washed away by his Son's
offering (pw sacrifice). So Messiah showed equal humility
when he
stooped down to us and died for us so that we could be in
equality to His Father's baruch'd (pw blessed) nature, having
our
past sins forgiven. The Son himself has told us to be equal to his
Father as well, of course in nature again, not poisition in the
following verse

Mat 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect,
even as your Father which is in shamayim (pw heaven) is
perfect.

The
word perfect here is telios which we cover elsewhere in this article.
Accroding to Stroing's Greek it clearly refers to character:

The likeness or equality is not about
having the
same throne of Yahuah in shamayim (pw heaven) but about the work and
nature that
is similar or equal. Thus we too are encouraged to be Michael, like
Yahuah in moral purity by obedience to Yah'uah.

Do I speak blasphemy? No! Read
again

Phillipians 2:5 Let this mind be in you,
which was also in Messiah (pw Christ) Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) : 6 Who,
being in the form of Elohim (pw God),
thought it not robbery to be equal with Elohim (pw God): 7 But made
himself of no
reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in
the likeness of men: 8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled
himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the stake
(pw cross).

This
nature has been the nature of Yah'uah since he, in reality, stooped
down
to us by sending his Son as saviour when we did not deserve it, while we were
sinners at the time

Read that again and read it until you
get the truth in your heart and mind. Paul is saying Yah'ushua did not
think it robbery to be like Yahuah (michael), (pw god-like, godly), and
HE IS TELLING YOU TO BE LIKE-MINDED, Have this same attitude in your
mind. He is not telling you
to be a trinitarian or that Yah'ushua is a trinitarian or for you to
form a trinity by being like-minded, ie. equal to Elohim (pw
God) in substance and
sovereignty - that is insane. He wants us to be equal in character of
righteousness.

From
Philllipians 2:5 we can also clear up the equality of "form" versus
"likeness". Yah'ushua is "in the form of Elohim" verse 6. "form" here
is:

Greek: 3444 morphe mor-fay'
perhaps from the base of 3313 (through the idea of adjustment of
parts); shape; figuratively, nature:--form.
see GREEK for 3313

It
is not equal substance or shape as trinitarian heretics try to imply.
That contradicts the statement by Yahuah himself that he is not a man
or the son of man but is spirit. If "form" here meant shape or
substance we
would have difficulty understanding then how he has the "form"
shape or substance of a servant:

verse 7 "and took upon him the form (3444)
of a servant"

Does
a servant have a particular shape or substance that we should be aware
of? Should they be shaped like a broom and be made of a woody substance
or something stupid like that? No, of course not, it refers to NATURE
- CHARACTER - ATTITUDE and so does the "form of Elohim" refer to equal
or same nature
- Yah-like!

verse 6 "Who,
being of the nature / character of Elohim (pw God),
thought it not robbery to be equal* (isos) with Elohim"

Isos

Let us examine this word "equal" more closely to confirm its correct
meaning.

[*StrongsGreek*]
2470
isos ee'-sos probably from 1492 (through the idea of seeming); similar
(in amount and kind):--+ agree, as much, equal, like. see GREEK for 1492

In this context the word's meaning is "agree" since the context is let
this mind
be in you. Paul is saying your mind should agree with Yahuah, be equal
with him, and then
react, become obedient to him as Messiah agreed with him and became
obedient even to death. It would also fit in with "like" since one can
be
like-minded and Yahuah-like in nature. Also note the word
equal
must hold "through the idea of seeming" it appears as though Yah'ushua
is equal by having the character of Yahuah but he is not literally
equal just as an earthly son and father seem to appear alike by
character but are not literally the same.

This word "isos" is seen only one other place in the New Testament.
Here the Jews used it in John 5:18. However there they made
the false conclusion and accusation that He was making himself "equal"
with or to Elohim (pw God) or "as much" Elohim (pw God). "As much God"
sounds almost identical
as the phrase "indeed the very God", invented by the trinity liars.
Here Yah'ushua responded to their allegation as he knew they accused
him of being Elohim the source of power and authority which he is not.
He simply has been given authority and power. He promptly corrects
them.

Jn
5:19Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself,
but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these
also doeth the Son likewise.20
For the Father loveth the Son, and sheweth him all things that himself
doeth: and he
will shew him greater works than these, that ye may
marvel. 21
For as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them; even so the
Son quickeneth whom he will. 22
For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment
unto the Son:

So
the false religious system then and now propogates the same lie that
Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) claims to be Elohim (pw God) when he clearly does
not. One
was
a false accusation and the other now has become a false doctrine.

It
is interesting how similar this Greek word "isos" sounds to Esus, the
pagan Gallic god pictured on the left. In fact, in Latin "isos" would
be
spelt "esus". One would also see the striking
closeness of Iesus( for Jesus) in Welsh and Greek Iesous (for Jesus).
This would finally lead to further paganising the Messiah's
name to Jesus. Some have debunked this, saying that Esus is
unconnected,
being an Indo-European word while Jesus is a semtic word. This is of
course not true since Jesus is not semtic at all but a transliteraion,
not just one transliteration but several through Greek and Latin
etc, from the
true semitic word, Yah'ushua. This was only recently done so it was
easy
to manipulate it towards the same sound of a pre-existing pagan god.
Esus can be
spelt Hesus and Jesus and in Hispanic is still pronounced Hey zeus in
today whilst Esus has a connection to Zeus as well.
A
"J" merely inserted for no reason
gives J-esus. Pagans would feel at home
with a pagan god sounding similar, and perhaps there is a connection
with the further similar sounding (isos) to make the incorrect
connection to the meaning of "equal", equal to the Almighty
Elohim himself, the very same false accusation against the Son
Yah'ushua by
the Pharisees. This would be the perfect step towards the preparation
and acceptance of a trinity heresy. Thus pagan
transliteration
made it easy to manipulate the name away
from his only true and real name, Yah'ushua, containing Yah (uah), and
thus away from Yahuah, away from Yahuah-likeness and
towards a new, and equal trinity "god" devoid of To'rah.

High standards
= Robbery?

Correcting the verse now as per
the above Greek definition of isos:

6
Who, being in the nature, character of Elohim (pw God),
thought it not robbery to be in agreement with Elohim (pw God)

Why
would it even be considered robbery by some if one is of a
nature
and character that agrees with Elohim? Simply because Yah-likeness is
so foreign to a corrupted, To'rah-less world, impotent of Yah's spirit,
who teaches "we cannot keep the law" even after the atonement and
spirit of Yahuah is upon us! It therefore would appear as if the one
who
aimed towards the standards of Yahuah's nature would be seen as being
so foreign, as if one were trying to be Elohim (pw God) himself, when,
in
fact, Elohim wants us to all be like him in character-
that is why he gave us To'rah. This was the very false accusation
levelled against Messiah for being an obedient Son of Elohim in the
midst of a corrupt and To'rah-less Jerusalem.

Mat 5:48
Be ye therefore perfect* , even as
your Father which is in shamayim (pw heaven) is perfect*.

The
false religion pretends to have an appearance of religion but denies
the power of the one true religion which is of Yah'uah. This pure
religion gives us the power to become the Sons of Elohim (pw God) to be
equal in agreement with his character, To'rah.

2 Tim 3:5
Having a form of godliness (piety religion) , but denying the power thereof:
from such turn away.

James
1:27 Pure religion and undefiled before Elohim (pw God) even (wrong
translation -and) the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and
widows in their affliction, and to keep himself
unspotted from the world.

Trinity Stumbling Block - Chasing Thrones

It
is Satan who wants to be "esos" in the context of equal, as much
Elohim (pw God) only in
the sense of having his throne
and sovereignty itself and even be above Elohim. That
is robbery. But Yah'ushua, being in the form of Elohim before being
begotten
( ie. spirit ), did not ever do that. Instead, He was equal in humility
and nature to Elohim so that the Father's throne could be exalted
through the Son's To'rah obedience. The trinity gospel inverts
the
truth
and
places Yah'ushua as one who wants to merely ascend to the throne and be
equal, if not higher than the Almighty these days with the forsaking of
To'rah. (The false Catholic Mary evidently represents that
Satanic
spirit.) It is not about the throne of Yah'ushua but the work
and
nature
that is equal, and the same mind should be in us. Even the right-hand
position on the throne next to the Father, He attributes it by giving
splendour to Yahuah.

Let
us look at a good example of chasing thrones.

Mat
20:20 ¶Then came to him the mother of Zebedee’s children with her
sons, worshipping him, and desiring a certain thing of him. 21 And he
said unto her, What wilt thou? She saith unto him, Grant that these my
two sons may sit, the one on thy right hand, and the other on the left,
in thy rule and reign (pw kingdom). 22 But Yah'ushua (pw Jesus)
answered
and said, Ye
know not what ye
ask. Are ye able to drink of the cup that I shall drink of, and to
be immersed (pw baptized) with the immersion (pw baptism) that
I
am immersed (pw baptized) with? They say unto him,
We are able. 23 And he saith unto them, Ye shall drink indeed of my
cup, and be baptized with the immersion (pw baptism) that I am immersed (pw baptized)
with: but to
sit on my right hand, and on my left, is not mine to give,
but it shall
be given to them for whom it is prepared of my Father.
24 And when the
ten heard it, they were moved with indignation against the two
brethren. 25 But Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) called them unto him, and said,
Ye know that the
princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are
great exercise authority upon them. 26 But it shall not be so among
you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister;
27 And whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant: 28
Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister,
and to give his life a ransom for many.

The
two brothers were rebuked - they were thinking like trinitarians, they
wanted to sit on either side of Yah'ushua as though he were Elohim (pw
God)
Almighty,
almost as if they could complete a triad on a throne with him as
demigods, after
all, trinities were already popular amongst Hellinistic Jews. Yah'ushua
clearly rebuked them for
thinking about thrones instead of servanthood, they were beginning to
sound like the King of Tyre, Satanic. LORDING over is the heathen way -
throne obsessed. This is the Papal way, trying to sieze power from the
Father and making void his To'rah with "church canons". The daughter
Protestant
churches (circe-circus) have also mostly followed suite. The Baptist
church, for
example, has over 2000 created laws, but like the Catholics it
abolishes
the seventh day sabbath and denies keeping To'rah in general, which has
only, more or less, 600 laws many not even applicable due to
Yah'ushua's atonement and the lack of a House of Yahuah (pw temple).
Since we, who are believers under
Messiah,
have been put to death in the flesh on the stake and live in the spirit
we too can aim to be YHUH-like as servants to his To'rah.

Is
it any wonder then that the pagan translators siezed upon another pagan
idea by having the sons of Zebedee being surnamed "Sons of Thunder" as
though as followers of
the now paganised (J)Zeus, perhaps making them then
sons of the god Zeus, the
god of thunder, .
Would this not be a perfect image of a trinity
with (J)Zeus seated in the middle upon a
throne, rather than
the true Yah'ushua on the right hand of Yahuah his Father? The truth
is,
Yah'ushua
named the brothers "Boanerges" which means sons of
commotion. You will see that whilst Strong's states it as
exactly that, the translators still insist on translating it as "sons
of thunder"!:

Mark
3:17 And James the son of Zebedee, and John the brother of James; and
he surnamed them Boanerges (strongs 993: sons of commotion), which is,
The sons of thunder.

Yah'ushua
crushes any idea of gods on thrones by emphasising men as servants,
using himself as the very example. Yah'ushua does not have a god
complex, contrary to popular pagan trinitarians who have attempted to
portray Him as such. In the same way the Sons of Zebedee were slipping
towards a type of trinitarian god complex before being rebuked by
Yah'ushua.They were forgetting and usurping the Father, just as pagan
Christianos does with its To'rahless Jesus/(J)Zeus. Yah'ushua
emphatically leaves it to the Father to decide who if
any will sit on either side of Him in ruling and reigning.
Yah'ushua is not
Elohim the Father and has no say in such a matter, He is the servant
Son
of Yahuah.

The "I AM" or
the "I am"?

Trinitarians
love to turn mere words into pronouns and then make those pronouns to
be names to prove that the pagan name "Jesus" , or even the real
Messiah Yah'ushua, somehow bears the name and position of the Sovereign
Elohim,
and thus they claim he is Elohim. Their favourite is:

John
8:56 "Your father
Abraham rejoiced to
see my day: and he saw it, and was glad.
57 Then said the Jews unto him,
Thou art not
yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?
58Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) said unto
them, Verily, verily, I say
unto you, Before Abraham was, I am."

"I am"
in this case should be: "I exist" or "I was". We
cannot make it a pronoun by adding capitals and making it into a name.

Strongs Concordance: am=1510 eimi i-mee' I exist (used
only when
emphatic):--am, have been, ie. it is I, was.

This in no way contradicts what scripture already declares that
Yah'ushua
(the Word) WAS with Elohim (pw God) before He was begotten in
the flesh
and
NOW
He is the Son of Elohim (pw God), still not Elohim (pw God) himself. It
merely shows his
precedence of existence in shamayim (pw heaven) prior to Abraham. So
what?
The
whole host of malakhim (pw angels) existed before Abraham too. It
proves
that
Yah'ushua's fleshly existence was preceded by a spiritual one, unlike
any other man on earth ever was or will be. He was Yahuah's first
begotten Son. Yah'ushua had existed in the spirit before the
worlds.

John
17: 4 I have magnified thee on the earth: I have finished the work
which thou gavest me to do. 5 And now, O Father, magnify thou me with
thine own self with the honour which I had with thee before the world
was.

As
we note, the son is still talking and praying to the Father as the Son,
and as we keep showing, will always be subject to the Father Elohim
(Almighty), He is never Elohim himself.

1
Cor 15:28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the
Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him,
that Elohim (the Almighty) may be all in all.

Please
note "I exist" in John 8 above and "It is I" in:

Mat 14:27"But
straightway Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) spake unto them, saying, Be of good
cheer; it
is I; be not afraid."

are
BOTH just two of the same
words in each case ego(I) and eimi (I exist).

Here
the exact same use ego (I) and eimi (I exist) are used and
obviously the centurion is not "I AM" either.

Now, lets be logical and obedient to the revelation by
the pure Ruach (pure Breath of Yahuah - not the Holi Babylon Hindu
Spirit)
as recorded in

Matthew
14:33 "Then they that were in the ship came and worshipped him, saying,
Of a truth thou art the Son of Elohim (pw God)."

So
this is what the Apostles
realised of Messiah - He is the Son of Elohim (pw God). This "Son of
Elohim (pw God)" principle
is clearly given by the pure Ruach (pw Holy Spirit) and anything
contrary is made up by
flesh and blood (doctrines of men).

Mat 16:15 "He
saith unto them, But whom say ye
that I am? 16And
Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Messiah (pw Christ), the
Son of the
living Elohim (pw God). 17And
Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) answered and said unto him, baruch'd (pw blessed)
art thou, Simon Bar–jona: for
flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is
in shamayim (pw heaven)."

Here
again Messiah says, but whom say ye that "I am". Peter does not say,
yes,
you are I AM, does he? No, because it is preposterous - he says, in
fact,
Thou art the Messiah (pw Christ), the Son of the living Elohim (pw
God). If "I am" was ever to be
a pronoun "I AM" here would have been the best time to state it.

It is interesting to note the verse we quoted at the beginning of this
article:

John
8:28 Then said Yah'ushua unto them, When ye have lifted up
(exalted) the Son of man, then shall ye know that I am (he*), and that
I do nothing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me, I speak these
things.

*
KJV adds "he" here. So
it should read "then shall you know that I exist (ego eimi) and do
nothing
of myself." Quite conveniently one would think if the "he" were NOT
inserted then ego eimi should be again considered as one of those
ridiculous pronouns where Yah'ushua is speaking in code and saying
"then shall you know that I AM". But it would not work and the lie
would
be exposed since the Son says right after that that he cannot do
anything but only what is taught to him by his Father (who is
the
I AM that I AM). Instead, He, in fact, attributes his very existence to
the I AM THAT I AM (self existent one) - his Father.

These"
I AM" deceivers do not even try to insert such a thing here when it is
blatantly opposed in the very same sentence by the Father's
contrasting presence and superiority. The trick of their "I AMs" are
only effective in that context where the Father's supremacy is absent
in the text reference and the Father's supremacy fades from the
forgetful minds of the foolish. The vigilant, however, remember the
Son's
many verses which shoot down false "I AM" attributions to him..

Let US Make Man In OUR Image - The creator needed
help?

The
Hebrew for the Almighty here (pw God) is Elohim which is plural for
Eloah (singular). Yahuah Elohim is in plural not because He is a three
headed G-o-d but because Hebrew uses the plural when it wishes to
express intensity and fullness. An example of this is seen for the word
"wisdom" spelt, chokmah, singular (eg. Ex 35:31), and wisdom
plural
spelt, chokmowth, (eg. Ps 49:3). Obviously wisdom is wisdom and the
plural
sense conveys intensity and fullness when in the plural.
Thus,
for
Elohim, plural of Eloha, the Almighty is the
Mightiest of
the Mighties, ie. he is ALL mighty.
It does not
in this case mean plurality by number but plurality by
power and position. This is further confirmed by scripture that the
Master Elohim (plural) remains ONE, ie. the great ALL Mighty ONE.

It
is clear that there is only ONE self-existent ONE YHUH from the
beginning. It is made clear early on in Genesis that YHUH is
the
Most high el / Most high Almighty / Supreme Almighty / elyown
el.
That he is the possessor of shamayim (pw heaven) and earth itself.

Gen 14:19 ...baruch'd (pw
blessed) be Abram of the most high el (elyown el), possessor of
shamayim (pw heaven) and earth:

When it says

Gen 1:26" ...Elohim (pw God) said let us..."

People
are quick to think that Yahuah is speaking to another part of
himself or to his Son
and some Holi ghost god at
this stage, as if he
needed help with His
creation and was not the All Powerful Elohim. This thinking is very
prominent again from the pagan Vatican (Minister of death) where Elohim
is blasphemed and
not seen as Supreme and all powerful and needed help with his creation,
thus a few extra gods should be thrown in, ah, yes, a trinity should do
the trick and a little evolution as well, or so they think as they try
to undermine Yahuah's sovereingty.

If
that were so it would state who he is speaking to but it does not. The
word "us" is simply not
there, it is merely inserted. The word "said"
has great latitude in meaning, not necessarily meaning a dialogue with
one or more entities. It can again refer to thought, desire, command,
etc, it
is the Hebrew word, amar:

Isaiah 45:5 "I am YHUH (pw LORD), and there
is
none else,
there is no Elohim (PLURAL) (pw God) beside me: I girded thee, though
thou hast not known me: 6 That they may know from the rising
of
the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside me. I am YHUH
(pw LORD), and there is none
else. 7 I form the light, and
create
darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I YHUH (pw LORD) do all
these things".

Yahuah
is saying that He alone is Elohim (ie. emphatic plural of Eloah - ALL
Mighty One) and that there is no other Elohim (ie. emphatic plural
Eloah
Mighty One). There may indeed be a mighty one (eloha), a god (created
by man), singular upon the
earth, and simply by their numbers they become
plural. However, what Yahuah is saying is that
their plurality by
numbers can never be mightier than the emphatic plural Elohim since he
remains ONE and yet greater than any number of mighty ones.

Remembering
that Elohim is not a man it follows that he does not bleed, thus, when
some use the following verse to prove 'Jesus is God' they are digging
themselves into a
deeper hole by reducing Elohim to a mortal man, as did the pagan
translators with their trinity bias here:

Acts20:
28 Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock,
over
the which the pure Breath (pw Holy Spirit) hath made you
overseers, to feed the assembly (pw church) of Elohim (pw God), which
he hath purchased with his own blood (Greek - haima).

[*StrongsGreek*]
129
haima hah'-ee-mah of uncertain derivation; blood, literally (of men or
animals), figuratively (the juice of grapes) or specially (the atoning
blood of Messiah (pw Christ)); by implication, bloodshed, also
kindred:--blood.

Yah'ushua is Yahuah's own Son, thus his own kindred by spirit but born
of a woman in the flesh. Thus it should read:

which he
(Yahuah) hath purchased
with his own kindred's blood or which he purchased by his own
kindred's bloodshed.

For unto us a
child is born...the mighty God?

A
verse that 's widely used as evidence that Yah'ushua is Elohim (pw God)
Himself is
the following as it appears in KJV:

Isaiah
9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the
government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called
Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty Elohim (pw God), The everlasting
Father, The
Prince of Peace.

Incorrect
use of this verse has done much damage in keeping Judaisers in Judaism
causing them to reject any idea of a Messiah being prophesied here
because the perverse Christian version of this Messiah usurps Elohim,
making himself Elohim. That is not the case!!

The
question is, who is the "He" being referred to here? It is
clear that the Father always receives splendour (pw glory) through the
action of the Son, especially at the very end.

1
Cor 15:26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death. 27 For
he (Father Elohim (pw God)) hath put all things under his (Son's) feet.
But when he
saith all things are put under him (Son), it is manifest that he
(Father Elohim (pw God))
is excepted, which did put all things under him (Son). 28 And when all
things shall be subdued unto him (Son), then shall the Son also himself
be subject unto him (the Father) that put all things under him, that
Elohim (pw God) may be all in all.

Satan (Santa) the father of lies, the father of pagan gods
also known as
Nick, the devil.

Now,
as
in the above verse it is important, firstly, to make a distinction
between the "He" and that it is the Father and Son who are
differentiated between, not melded into one as those who quote Isaiah
9:6 would like to make you believe. So, from 1 Cor 15:26 the ultimate
conclusion is that, the
government upon the shoulders of the Son is handed back to the Father
so that the Father may receive pre-eminence (be all in all) and be
distinctly
known as the Father. In other words, the reason for the Son coming and
being given the government upon His shoulders was not to
create a
confusion of Son = God, but on the contrary, that Son = Son and Elohim
= Elohim all in all. Now, take note, the word excepted! in
Verse 27. It is shown
that Elohim (pw God) is excepted
when putting everything under the
Son.

Full
Definition of except : transitive verb : to take or leave out from a
number or a whole : exclude

Merriam
Webster

So,
when
it says, all
things are put under the Son, it is clear that that EXCLUDES
the Father who still reigns supreme. So it also follows
that Yah'ushua is himself still subject TO the Father. In
other words the Son of Elohim rules to show how much He is not Elohim
by the very fact that He returns his rule to the Father when he has
accomplished his Father's
appointed purposes.

Now,
if we apply Isaiah 9:6 and ask, when was Yah'ushua (pw
Jesus) called any
of these names whilst on earth? I believe we would find it difficult to
answer. Yah'ushua is certainly referred to as a Prince, which simply
means, ruler or chief, etc. and he has been made ruler over all things
by
the Father as we have just stated. However, Yah'ushua (pw Jesus)
is not referred to as the Prince of Peace. In fact, he clearly said he
did not come to earth to bring peace here.

Mat
10:34 Think not that I am come to send shalom (pw peace) on earth: I
came not to
send shalom (pw peace), but a sword.

The
Son, I believe, is clearly telling us not to confuse the title, Prince
of
Peace, in Isaiah directly with himself. It would not be the first time
prophecy has been confused, as with the prophecy of Jeremiah when the
Jews expected Messiah to ride upon a horse but he came upon an ass.(two
different propehicies). So,
can we ascribe this title to him here? No. Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) has
been
called the Prince of the kings of the earth (Rev 1:5), Prince of life
(Acts 3:15) and Prince and Saviour (Acts 5:31), but never Prince or
Ruler of Peace! What about Wonderful Counsellor? Nowhere to
be seen when referring to "Jesus", but we do hear Paul referring to
Yahuah (pw God the Father) as the counsellor.

Rom
11:34 For who hath known the mind of the Master (pw Lord)? or
who hath been his counsellor?

Proof
that it is Master Elohim
and not Master Yah'ushua here, since Paul knows his scriptures and
quotes them from
the Tanakh (pw Old Testament).

Isaiah 40:13 Who
hath directed the Spirit of YHUH (pw LORD) or being his
counsellor hath taught him?

The
pagan corrupted rendering of LORD
in capitals always refers to the proper name YHUH meaning Yahuah, I am
that I am, the self existent one. This can be distinguished from "Lord"
lower case which simply refers to a title - Master. Of course
the renewed
everlasting covenant (pw New Testament) does not distinguish,
making it appear as the Master Yah'ushua and the Master Yahuah are one
and the same, which they are not! The translators did their best in
hiding YHUH the Father's name, trying to eradicate it. So here Isaiah
is clearly referring to Elohim (pw God) the Father who taught
(counselled, advised)
the Son. Marcion would have some thinking that the Son counselled the
Father, telling him his To'rah is evil and to be done away with - Yah
forbid!

John
14:10 Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me?
the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself
(*not of my own
authority or counsel): but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the
works.

*my
own words

Back
to Isaiah as it appears in KJV:

Isaiah
9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the
government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called
Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty Elohim (pw God), The everlasting
Father, The
Prince of Peace.

Now
we shall see the best effort yet by the devious translators and how
they have twisted this verse even to try to deceive the Hebrews into
thinking that "Jesus is God", so much so that they discount these
Messianic verses altogether as referring to the Messiah because of this
idolatrous idea, and rightly so. However, the Jews take advantage of
such a
glaring opportunity to simply deny the Son and try to make Son refer to
Israel, which is ridiculous, and it will cost their souls as
they continue to prefer their own idolatry of Judaism - following
rabbis
and men's flawed teachingsl and deny the Son.

The
first part is fine and straight foward

For unto us a child is born, unto us a son
is given...

referring
to the son being born and given to us, which is the Son of Yahuah, who
was certainly given to us as an offering or atonement (pw sacrifice).

The
second part refers to the authority placed by the Father upon his son's
shoulders, a ruler (Prince) over all things EXCEPT
Yahuah himself, as described above in 1 Cor 15:26.

At
first we see

...and the
government shall be upon his shoulder...

But then we come to the more deceptive third part

... and his name shall be called
Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty Elohim (pw God), The
everlasting
Father, The
Prince of Peace.

This
horrendous translation makes it appear as if this "Jesus" would in the
future be called, amongst other things, the everlasting Father and
mighty Elohim. This blasphemy contradicts the sovereignty of
Elohim and everything we have just proven using the scriptures
themselves, and when scripture appears to contradict itself it is
usually one of several things: wrong understanding, wrong context,
wrong translation, etc. In this case it is clearly wrong
translation because of a catholic trinity bias and Marcion spirit.
Isaiah was prophesying in the name of Yahuah, not in the name of the
Catholic "church" who invented pagan "Jesus is God" doctrine much
later. Now I shall prove to you what it should say.

Taking all the Hebrew words in the phrase using Strong's and comparing
them to the KJV (top row):

and

his

name

shall

be

called

08034
shem shame a primitive word (perhaps rather from 7760through the idea of definite and
conspicuous position; compare 8064);
an appellation, as a mark or memorial of individuality; by
implication
honor,authority,
character:--+ base, (in-)fame(-ous), named(-d),
renown, report. see HEBREW for 07760 see HEBREW for 08064

Firstly
it
becomes clear that "and his" is not really there. Secondly translating
"qara" as "called" throws all the Father's titles onto the
inserted"his", ie. the Son, which is a lie. "qara"
is used a number of times to denote proclaiming, publishing, preaching
the name of Yahuah. The very fact that the Son is born of the Father,
it follows that the son receives the authority that comes with the
office of honour given by the Father and the Father receives the honour
in return since the Son serves the Father with honour and proclaims his
names Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty Elohim (pw God), The
everlasting Father, The
Prince of Peace by preaching his Word.

Examples
of "qara":

Here
we see the same word used for both "called" and "proclaimed" in the
same verse.

Jer
34:15 And ye were now turned, and had done right in my sight, in proclaiming
(qara) freedom (pw liberty) every man to his neighbour;
and ye had made
a covenant before me in the house which is called (qara- proclaimed )
by my name

Ex
33:19 And he said, I will make all my goodness pass before thee, and
I will proclaim
(qara)
the name of Yahuah before thee...

Ex 34:5 And YHUH / Yahuah (pw LORD) descended in the cloud,
and
stood with him there, and proclaimed
(qara) the name of Yahuah.

Now thirdly in the table above we see that the "shall be" is central to
the confusion. Here it would either imply that Yah'uah Elohim will be
in the future called Wonderful Counsellor, The mighty Elohim
(pw
God), The everlasting
Father, The
Prince of Peace. or if you are trinitarian, that this "Jesus" in the
future will be called these things including Mighty God since he is of
course this G-o-d in the eyes of the pagan trinitarian. But what if the
correct translation were used having "shall be" replaced with the
alternate "that
is". Obviously these names of the eternal Father have been eternally
existent and they are not someting future, they have existed
always. He has always been the Mighty Elohim (pw God) so
there is
no "shall be" it is simply ridiculous and like stating the obvious.
Instead the correct translation "that is" refers to the names that are
in existence already, the names of Yah'uah eternal.

Thus
Isaiah 9:6 is more likely stating the following:

For
unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the
government (of Yah'uah) is* upon his (the son's) shoulder: and the name that is
proclaimed and preached is Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty
Elohim, The everlasting Father, The
Prince of Peace.

*I have replaced the first "shall be", which
appears in the KJV but not in Hebrew, with "is". When Isaiah wrote this
the Son had already been born in shamayim (pw heaven) and was placed
over creation and so the government
was already upon his shoulders, he simply had to be born in the flesh
in the future but with the government and name and or authority of
Yahuah already upon his shoulders. You will notice how the tense now
all makes sense.

The
descriptive name has the title,
"Everlasting Father". "Everlasting Father" cannot be given
to
the Son. So the Father' s name is clearly being referred to here, not
the Son.
Specifically, He is an "Everlasting Father" in that his Son has been
begotten and been given eternal life. If his Son had died the name
"Everlasting Father" could not be true since an Eternal Father has an
Eternal Son, and all the more since that Son has inherited us who
believe on Him as sons who shall also be eternal. It is therefore The
Eternal Father who is Wonderful Counsellor, The Mighty Elohim, and that
is only fully realised when his Eternal Son has accomplished his
appointed office. Note the title, Mighty Elohim = The Mighty Mighty one
= The ALL MIGHTY ONE not little "gods" as some try to argue.

The Son
receives Counsel
from the Father, hence He himself said, why do you call me good Rabbi
(teacher / master), there is only ONE good teacher, counsellor, that is
the
Father - he stated that categorically!!

The
emphasis is not on good
but on teacher.
Obviously Messiah is good, he is the Good Shepherd, but the teaching is
not his own new good teaching, the source is:

FROM HIS FATHER, THE ONE AND
ONLY GOOD SOURCE OF TEACHING.

So anyone who claims that there
is a Jesus who

brings his own new good news
teaching called a New Testament

or his own new good
news Gospel / Godspell (from German Gott spell)

is a liar and blasphemer of the
Father's everlasting teaching

which is the commandments of
Yahuah.

His Son refers to the good
teaching of his Father's To'rah

"Thou knowest
the commandments, Do not commit adultery...etc"

He does not
refer to a lawless Protestant,

Catholic,
Charismatic, Pentecostal, Trinity doctrine etc

a new
replacement religion called Christianos / Christianity? NO!

he refers to his Father's To'rah

PERIOD!!

Numbers 6:27
And they (Priest Aaron and his sons) shall put my name* upon the
children of Israel; and I will baruch (pw bless) them.

Here
we see how Yahuah puts his name upon
all the children of Elohim by the
priestly baruch (pw blessing). That name includes the name "THAT IS"
(not "shall be") Wonderful
Counsellor, The mighty Elohim (pw God), The everlasting Father, The
Prince of Peace. This in no way makes the children of Israel
Elohim himself, it simply means they bear his authority over them and
thus should proclaim His name in deed and word and be baruch'd. They
are children or citizens of his government. Yah'ushua was
given
the headship over this government and thus Yahuah placed his name
(authority) Wonderful Counsellor, The Mighty Elohim (pw God),
The Everlasting Father, The
Prince of Peace upon Yah'ushua's shoulders as well.

Now,
what does Isaiah say further along, referring to the government itself?

Isaiah
9:7 Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end,
upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to
establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for
ever.

Now,
as
we have seen, the government ended for David but was revived through
the
line of David in Yah'ushua ( the root and offspring of David). But this
government ends again as Yah'ushua hands it
over to Elohim (pw God) (1 Cor 15:26). So who is the "his" in "his
government"
obviously the eternal Elohim, the Father, whose rule does NOT end. The
government obviously has increased and is increasing for the Father,
since we, his
believing sons, who Yah'ushua has inherited, are ruled over
with justice and shalom (pw peace) in the everlasting kingdom, for He,
the
Almighty,
is the King of the saints and they serve Him.

Revelation
15:3 And they sing the song of Moses the servant of Elohim (pw God),
AND the song
of the Lamb, saying, Great and marvellous are thy works, Master (pw
Lord) Elohim (pw God)
Almighty; just and true are thy ways, thou King of saints.

We see
that Elohim AND the Lamb each have thrones in that kingdom, as will the
12
disciples as well.

Luke
22:30 That ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on
thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel.

But
there is a hierarchy, not a shared sovereign authority. The mere fact
that the
12 disciples will be sitting on thrones does not make them demigods or
idols, neither is Yah'ushua made so, since Yahuah is Elohim (pw God)
Almighty on His
throne. The point is, who is the King at the end of the day, but the
Almighty? Nobody sits on HIS throne, period! There is none besides Him!
While Messiah may sit beside him that does not replace the Father who
still sits on the Almighty throne, there is none besides ( ie. that
replaces that very position).

Rev
2:23And there shall be no more curse: but the throne of Elohim AND of
the
Lamb shall be in it; and his servants shall serve him*:

(*Him - being Elohim (pw God),
not Jesus, nor both, otherwise it would state "them" plural in line
with
"and")

Revelation
22:1 And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal,
proceeding out of the throne of Elohim (pw God) AND of the Lamb.

They
simply are not, have not and will not be ONE-and-the-SAME!! They are
one in agreement but NOT the same, as we who are believers are one in
agreement with the Son but
not the same.

John
14:11 Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: John
14:23.....If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will
love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

John
14:20 At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me,
and I in you.

There
simply is nothing specific to a trinity idea when it comes to oneness
and being in the Son who is in the Father and the Son who is in us if
we keep his commandments. Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) is not Elohim (pw God)
Almighty. "In us" is by the spirit - mind, thoughts and moral To'rah
obedient character, not substance or shape. Now lets back up a
bit in Isaiah 9 again, verse 6

"For unto us
a child is born, unto us a
son is given."

So it
is immediately clear that Messiah is born of the
flesh, but more importantly, when it says, a son is given, the Hebrew
for
son, "ben" directly translated means, a builder of the family name. So
what Isaiah is saying is that, son, refers to the Builder of
the Name,
but not that he is that person - he carries what it stands
for. He upholds the family name of the Father - YAHUAH. The government
is placed upon his son's shoulders. In other words, the Messiah came to
build the name of Yahuah so that ultimately we will live to recognise,
witness and enjoy the Almighty's full titles as Prince of Peace,
Wonderful (,) Counsellor, Mighty God (Yahuah) and Everlasting Father.
Yahuah's name will be magnified as prophesied since there will be no
more war or tears.

It
is clear that Isaiah was a struggle too for others,
including the
eunuch in understanding who was being spoken of in the verses. Some
guidance was requested.

Act
8:30-37 And Philip...heard him read the prophet Isaiah, and
said, Understandest thou what thou readest? And he said,
How can I, except some man should guide me?..The
place of the scripture which he read was...He was led as a sheep to the
slaughter; and like a lamb dumb before his shearer, so opened he not
his mouth: In
his humiliation his judgment was taken away: and who shall declare his
generation? for his life is taken from the earth...of whom
speaketh the prophet this? of himself, or of some other man? ...Philip...at
the same scripture...preached unto him Yah'ushua (pw Jesus). And
as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the
eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be immersed (pw
baptized)? And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart,
thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Yah'ushua (pw
Jesus) Messiah (pw Christ) is the Son of Elohim (pw God).

This
was a struggle even with reference to a single "he" and so Isaiah 9:6
with two "he's" being referred to is understandably a struggle
for
some without the additional mistranslations thrown in by the catholics.
So what we see is remarkable. The eunuch immediately wants to be
immersed and the requirement is that he
believes Messiah to be the Son
of Elohimwhich he does. If
Philip had really been a trinitarian do you
not think he would have then not moved to Isaiah 9:6 and quoted it as a
catholic resulting in the eunuch rather saying I believe the Messiah is
the Mighty God, Wonderful Counsellor, Everlasting Father??? Well, he
does
not, and why does he not do that? Did Ireaneus not promote the twisted
trinitarian 'baptism formula" which lead to a trinity teaching. Was
pure immersion in water not the root for a corruption towards a trinity
and "Jesus is God" fable? So why is it absent here in Acts???
Simply because the scriptures are not a fable but catholicism is.
Messiah is the Son of Elohim and that is what Isaiah preached, that is
what Philip preached, that is what Messiah himself preached and that is
what the eunuch then understood and believed, allowing him to be
immersed. He was not turned away by the catholic clergy for denying the
trinity "Jesus is God" heresy. Philip surely taught Isaiah 9:6
correctly explaining the Son born and given to us by Yahuah, the
Messiah, Son of
Elohim, not Son = Elohim.

In this catholic cross infested scene depicting the council of
Nicae we see the man in blue without a pagan Helios halo,
most likely Arius. He is rejected by Rome for denying the "Jesus is
God" lie. I expect the eunuch in Acts would have found himself in the
same situation had he been around in AD 325. We will find ourselves in
the same situation today around the pagan church system. We will be
rejected for denying a commandment that was never made by Yahuah to
believe that "Jesus is God". And yet we will be further rejected by
them for accepting the To'rah commands that he realy DOES command eg
sabbath keeping etc.They are true Pharisees.

EVEN THE
SON HAS A FATHER - HE CANNOT BE THE EVERLASTING FATHER OF Is 9:6
HIMSELF - PERIOD!:

Romans
15:6 That ye may with one mind and one mouth give honour to (pw
glorify) Elohim (pw God),
even
the
Father of our Master Yah'ushua (pw
Jesus) Messiah (pw Christ).

John
17: 1 These words spake Yah'ushua (pw Jesus), and lifted up his eyes to
shamayim (pw heaven), and
said, Father, the hour is come; honour (pw glorify) thy Son, that thy
Son also may
honour (pw glorify) thee: 2 As thou hast given him power over all
flesh, that he
should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given him. 3 And this
is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true Elohim
(pw
God), AND
Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) Messiah (pw Christ), whom thou hast
sent. 4 I have honoured (pw glorified) thee on the earth : I
have finished the work which thou gavest me to do. 5 And now, O Father,
honour ( pw glorify) thou me with thine own self with the honour (pw
glory) which I
had with
thee before the world was. 6 I have manifested THY NAME unto the men
which thou gavest me out of the world: thine they were, and thou gavest
them me; and they have kept thy word. 7 Now they have known that all
things whatsoever thou hast given me are of thee. 8 For I have given
unto them the words which thou gavest me (*since you are the Wonderful
Counsellor); and they have received them, and have known surely that I
came out from thee, and they have believed that thou didst send me.

(*my
own words)

In John 10:30 Yah'ushua said

"I
and the
Father are one".

When
reading this verse alone, and out of context, it would appear
that Yah'ushua is making a statement that He is Elohim (pw God) but the
truth is
found in John 17:20-21 where Yah'ushua prays for
all His followers, even those who have not yet been
born.

"Neither
pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me
through their word; that they all may be one; as thou Father, art in
me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us; that the world may
believe that thou hast sent me."

Here
Yah'ushua prays that all His followers will be one
with Him, just as He and His Father are one, that is, He wants everyone
to be in unison, one mind with the All Mighty One, Elohim

See
also

John
17:11 "And now I am no
more in the
world, but these are in the world, and I come to thee. Set apart (pw
Holy) Father,
keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they
may be one, as we are."

If
oneness were to mean equal substance then we all would be Elohim,
which we are not. We are only one in unity to Yahuah through obedience
to his will (To'rah). It is in oneness of state (unity), not substance,
by
the state that the spirit set our minds to obey through Yahuah's spirit
of
wisdom.

Scripture
teaches clearly that Elohim (pw God) is "one", He stands alone, and
tolerates no
equals or rivals.

Isaiah 43:1s "Ye
are my witnesses, saith YHUH (pw LORD), and my servant whom I have
chosen: that ye may know and believe
me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no Elohim (pw God)
formed,
neither shall there be after me."

Isaiah 45:5 "I
am YHUH (pw LORD), and there is none
else, there is no Elohim (pw God) beside me: I girded thee, though thou
hast not
known me: 6 That
they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there
is none beside me. I am YHUH (pw LORD), and there is none
else.
7 I form the light, and create darkness: I
make peace, and create evil: I YHUH (pw LORD) do all these things".

John
14:28 28 "Ye have heard
how I
said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye
would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is
greater than I. "

1
Timothy 2: 4 "Who will have all
men to be
saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. 5
For there is one Elohim (pw God), and one
mediator
between Elohim (pw God) and men, the man Messiah (pw Christ) Yah'ushua
(pw Jesus);"

(Just
an interesting aside - it is a "conflict of interest" in today's
earthly law if the Advocate is
the same person as the Judge. Surely the same should apply in the
justice of shamayim (pw heaven) where Messiah Yah'ushua is the
appointed advocate / mediator (1 John 2:1) and YHUH is the
judge (Heb 12:23 and 1 Peter 1:17)?

Yah'ushua is
the perfect image of His Father in shamayim (pw heaven), and it is
obvious that the
Trinity is a man-made doctrine by the pagan institiution called
"Church" at the Council of Nicaea
in AD 325. It has no place nor foundation in the scriptures,
nor
in the simple Gospel taught by Yah'ushua and the
Apostles. The doctrine of the Trinity did not form part of
the teachings of Yah'ushua or the Apostles, as recorded in the
REC. As we have seen, it is a product of many factors
prevalent in Egypt between the third and fourth centuries in the
fledgling "Christian Church". The moment of truth :
Whom should we believe, Elohim (pw God) or man?

Reminders that Yah'ushua is
subordinate to His Father :

Matt 19:16 "And,
behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall
I do, that I may have eternal life? 17
And he said unto him, Why callest thou me
good? there is none good but one, that is, Elohim (pw God): but if thou
wilt enter
into life, keep the commandments."

Luke 1:32 "He shall be great, and shall be
called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord Elohim (pw God) shall give
unto him the
throne of his father David:"

John 5:18 "Therefore the
Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the
sabbath, but said also that Elohim (pw God) was his Father, making
himself equal
with Elohim (pw God). 19 Then
answered Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say
unto you, The
Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for
what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son
likewise.

John 5: 30 I can of mine own self do
nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek
not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me."

John 8:28 "Then said Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) unto
them, When ye
have lifted up the Son of man, then shall ye know that I am he, and
that I do nothing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me, I speak
these things."

Acts 2:22 "Ye men of Israel, hear these words;
Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) of Nazareth, a man approved of Elohim (pw God)
among you by miracles and
wonders and signs, which Elohim (pw God) did by him in the midst of
you, as ye
yourselves also know."

Acts 10:38 "How Elohim (pw God) anointed
Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) of Nazareth
with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and
healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for Elohim (pw God) was
with him."

1 Cor 11:3 "But I would have you know, that the
head of every man is Messiah (pw Christ); and the head of the woman is
the man; and
the head of Messiah (pw Christ) is Elohim (pw God)."

1 Cor 15:24 "Then cometh the end, when he shall
have delivered up the kingdom to Elohim (pw God), even the Father; when
he shall
have put down all rule and all authority and power. 25
For he must reign, till he hath put all
enemies under his feet. 26 The
last enemy that shall be destroyed is death. 27
For he hath put all things under his feet.
But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he
is excepted which did put all things under him. 28
And when all things shall be subdued unto
him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all
things under him, that Elohim (pw God) may be all in all."

Phil 2:9 "Wherefore Elohim (pw God) also hath
highly
exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: 10
That at the name of Yah'ushua (pw
Jesus) every
knee should bow, of things in shamayim (pw heaven), and things in
earth, and things
under the earth;"

John 3: 16 ¶ "For Elohim (pw God) so
loved the
world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in
him should not perish, but have everlasting life."

Heb 5:4 And
no man taketh this honour unto himself, but he that is called of Elohim
(pw God),
as was Aaron. 5 So also Messiah (pw Christ) glorified
not himselfto
be made an high priest;
but he that said unto him, Thou art my Son, to day have I begotten thee.

Any other doctrine other than that taught by Yah'ushua is a
Marcion spirit which hates YHUH of the Everlasting Covenant (pw Old
Testament) as though He and
His law are evil - they wish to set up a new God, a false Jesus called
"God the Son" to overthrow Elohim (pw God) the Father and his
Law. But
His Son came not to abolish the Law but to fulfill it!

John 5:1 "Whosoever
believeth that Yah'ushua is the Messiah (pw Christ) is born of God
[YHUH]: and every
one that loveth him that begat loveth him also that is begotten of him.
2 By this we know that we love
the children of
God [YHUH], when we love God [YHUH], and keep hiscommandments."

Note : If we love Elohim (pw
God) the Father
because He begot the Son then we are begotten sons through
Messiah
(pw Christ) and we love the true Messiah (pw Christ). If we make him
"unbegotten"
(as though not coming in the flesh) then we create an anti-Messiah (pw
Christ) and
also hate Elohim (pw God) the Father's commandments.

1
John 4:3
And every spirit that confesseth not that Yah'ushua Messiah (pw Christ)
is come in
the flesh is not of Elohim (pw God): and this is that spirit of an
opponent of
Messiah (pw antichrist), whereof
ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the
world.

Please
forget whatever doctrine you
heard from a man. Hear our Master Yah'ushua from his
own lips - this is the p'shat -
straight word:

John 14:28 "If
ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father:
for my Father is GREATER THAN I."

Remember

Romans 2:29 "But he is a Jew, which
is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit,
and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of Elohim (pw
God).")

A Elohim (pw God) -fearing Jew will
never accept a Messiah who has come to abolish moral law. If
Messiah said YHUH
is "greater than I", but you insist Messiah is greatest, then you make
Him
an idol and a liar. That which is loved more than Abba Father
is an idol.

-
-
- 00O00 - - -

BELOW ARE OUR REPSONSES TO
FURTHER QUESTIONS

POSTED BY
READERS ON OUR SISTER

BLOG SITE WHERE
THIS ARTICLE WAS ORIGINALLY POSTED

SOME REPETITION MAY BE SEEN BUT
IT IS NECESSARY

QUESTION:

Why was Jesus (Yah'ushua) allowed
to share in God's (YHUH) glory? John 17:5, "And now, O Father, glorify
thou me with thine own self with the glory (doxa) which I had with thee
before the world was."

OUR RESPONSE:

(I will use the word glory but the word
honour is more correct. This word "glory" is a pagan word
"identified with the Sun as being radiant, shining, brilliant, bright
as the sun. "Gloria" was a Roman goddess that was half-naked and held
the zodiac signs.) Honour, as you state, is the correct word.

Note: that Yah'ushua prays to
the Father and asks for the honour (pw glory) he had WITH YHUH. He does
not ask for
YHUH's own honour (pw glory) or to be YHUH.

Adam and Eve shared in this honour (pw
glory) they
had WITH YHUH before they fell from it and came short of it.

Rom_3:23
For
all have sinned, and come short of the honour (pw glory) OF YHUH;

Yah'ushua did not come short
but had honour (pw glory) with YHUH - He kept it by overcoming the
world, as we can
through His perfect offering (pw sacrifice) and through the pure spirit
of YHUH.

Remember, Yah'ushua was made a
little lower (in honour (pw glory) ) than the malakhim (pw
angels) - made a man with flesh.

Heb_2:7
Thou
MADEST him
a little lower than the malakhim (pw angels) ; thou CROWNEDST
him with splendour and honour, and didst SEThim
over the works of thy hands:

Note, it is YHUH that is doing the
giving, setting and the crowning of Yah'ushua here.

QUESTION:

How could a fleshly saviour save us from sin, since flesh is sinful and
at enmity with the spirit? Jesus had to be God.

RESPONSE:

When
Adam and Eve were created in the flesh they were not sinful but perfect
and good in the eyes of Yahuah. It is only gnosticism that teaches that
all flesh is evil and that only spirit is good. In fact, this leads to
the antinomian heresy that sin in the flesh / body does not lead to
spiritual death, as if one has attained a spiritual separation from
one's sins by a fake Jesus god and can continue sinning. Yahu'shua, the
Son of man, showed that He, indeed, came in the flesh since He
promptly died when he took upon him all our sins. This is evidence
enough. But the pure spirit of Yahuah, his Father, rasied him from the
dead since his Son's own body was guiltless of sin and innocent. His
flesh was not evil as he always obeys To'rah which is
righteousness.

STATEMENT

When scripture says this:
"I am the Lord: that is my name: and my honour (pw glory) will I not
give to
another, neither my praise to graven images. (Isaiah 42:8) honour (pw
glory) (כָּבוֹד)
in this verse means glory or honor. In this verse, the word
give (נָתַן)
means to give, put, set. Here is the verse in its context: To
open blind eyes, to bring out prisoners from the dungeon and those who
dwell in darkness from the prison. "I am the LORD, that is My name; I
will not give My honour (pw glory) to another, Nor My praise to graven
images.
"Behold, the former things have come to pass, Now I declare new things;
Before they spring forth I proclaim them to you."

RESPONSE

Firstly remember, His name is not Lord,
it is YHUH. This makes the argument that YHUH is YHUH,
and Yah'ushua is Yah'ushua, two individual names, not the same.
As we will see later Yah'ushua's name certainly bears YHUH's name
-Yah'ushua , meaning Yah saves, it is Yahuah that is our redeemer and
he
sent Yah'ushua to accomplish His salvation for us .

YHUH has His own honour (pw glory)
and Yah'ushua has been given His own, a certain kind of honour (pw
glory)
determined by the Father.

Now, as a child is to honour his
parents, as commanded by YHUH, then the parents receive honour. In the
same way Yah'ushua has been given honour by YHUH as mentioned
in your first statement. It has been imputed to Him through His
righteousness.

Let me repeat once again by referring
you once more to the same scripture:

2
Cor 25 For he must
reign, TILL he hath put all enemies under his
feet. 26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death. 27 For he
hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are
put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted which did put all
things under him. 28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, THENshall
the Son also himself be subject unto him that put
all things under him, that YHUH may be all in all.

From the above we see that YHUH has not
GIVEN his honour but loaned honour till heaven and earth have passed
away and until death (the last enemy) is destroyed. This honour ends
and THEN Yah'ushua is fully subject to YHUH and YHUH is all in
all.

So YHUH has not abdicated His throne in
any way, but delegated His power and authority for a time to his Son
who makes His name and To'rah (Word made flesh) more honorable, not
less
honorable. This is what ministration means.

Parents have, by YHUH, also been given
the power over their children to be honoured by them, even generally by
secular civil law
(although that is now also being corrupted), but this does not make
parents
YHUH. In the same light, children must not honour parents blindly if
the parents are wilfully disobeying YHUH's commandments and are
dishonouring YHUH. The context of obeying parents is that of parents
who obey YHUH.

So YHUH has not given His honour (pw
glory) away.
On the contrary, by loaning His honour to Yah'ushua it is YHUH
that has been magnified BY the Son. It is only the false trinity
doctrine that elevates the false Jesus (Ieosous invented 400 years
after first KJV, honouring a god Zeus, born on 25 December, which
blasphemes the name of YHUH and tries to abolish his law (expressed as
the true Word made flesh - Yah'ushua). This also attempts to take
honour
away from the Father.

Did YHUH not "loan" or impute his
honour (pw glory)
to Moses during his ministration?

II
Cor 3:7 But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in
stones, was GLORIOUS, so that the children of Israel could not
stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the HONOUR (pw glory) OF HIS
COUNTENANCE;
which honour (pw glory) was to be done away: 8 How shall not the
ministration of
the spirit be rather HONOURABLE (pw glorious)?

While false teachers jump all over this
verse to say that the law has been done away with, when the words are
clearly glaring them in the face that it is the MINISTRATION of that
same law that has changed from Moses to the Spirit.

So the glory (honour) was on Moses,
then on Yah'ushua (in the flesh), and now through the pure
spirit of YHUH in us. But the honour of YHUH remains His own when He
has accomplished all his purposes. Yes, YHUH will certainly NOT give
His honour (pw glory) to another, namely SATAN who has been trying to
take it by
force and by many wiles - that is, after all, why YHUH sent his Son
Yah'ushua, so that the USURPER of YHUH's HONOUR (pw glory) may be
destroyed.

Messiah's ministration as High Priest
has been loaned to him (as it was to Moses) until YHUH is again all in
all and Yah'ushua subject to him.

Is 42:21 YHUH is well pleased for his
righteousness' sake; he will magnify the law, and make it honourable.
(....through Yah'ushua).

If YHUH's law is honourable then it is
glory (honour) to YHUH's name - to Him alone.

Yah'ushua in no
way
contradicts Yahuah who says "my honour (pw glory) will I not give to
another" since
Yah'ushua bears
witness of the Father - he does not bear false witness of Him or
witness of Himself - he fulfills (carries out) the ten commandments(Ex 20:16)

Jn 14:13 And whatsoever ye shall ask
in my name, that will I do, THAT the Father may be honoured (pw
glorified)
in the Son.

The Father is honoured in
what the Righteous Son does, just as a child brings honour to the
parent (or shame when he does not obey).

Therefore it is not robbery
for Yah'ushua to be equal with YHUH in being like-minded with YHUH.

This is unlike Satan, who attempts to
usurp YHUH's honour (pw glory) for himself lawlessly (by breaking
To'rah).

Is 14:12 How art thou fallen from
heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the
ground, which didst weaken the nations! 13 For thou hast said in thine
heart, I will ascend into heaven, I WILL EXALT MY THRONE ABOVE THE
STARS OF YHUH: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in
the sides of the north: 14 I will ascend above the heights of the
clouds; I will be like the most High. 15 Yet thou shalt be brought down
to gehenna, to the sides of the pit.

Yah'ushua however:

Phllipians 2:6 Who, being in the form
(nature) of YHUH, thought it not robbery to be equal with YHUH

Now, how could / can Yah'ushua be
”Equal with YHUH”? Well, in two ways, equal in agreement with the
Father
and his will. As is one of the meanings of the word, equal.

[*StrongsGreek*]
2470 isos ee'-sos probably from 1492 (through the idea of seeming);
similar (in amount and kind):--+ agree, as
much, equal, like. see GREEK for 1492

However let's use scripture to define
"equal" here in the Hebrew understanding as the Pharisees declare here :

Jn 5:18 but
said also that Elohim was his Father, making himself equal with Elohim.

It is very simple. Yahuah Elohim is
spirit and not a man but He created
his first begotten Son in the spirit, thus his spiritual Father is
Yahuah, thus equal as his spiritual kindred.

The
stumbling block for the Pharisees was that the Son came in the flesh as
a servant, lowering himself, so how could he be equal in kinship? To
them
equality should be always presented with power and position, not
character based.

We will also receive this equal
kinship/sonship since He has given us power to become the sons of
Elohim by the same spirit, as we are servants to him in the flesh. It
also will not be robbery since this rightful inheritance will be given
to the righteous. To those who do not obey him it would be robbery to
try and storm the gates or climb over the wall into the eternal home of
the Father and demand kinship. This is the most part of the false
religion of Christianity - self-entitlement without obedience to the
Father's To'rah. (See John 10).

Now, lets see what it says of Noah

Hebrews 11:7
By faith Noah, being warned of YHUH of things not seen as yet, moved
with fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house; by the which he
condemned the world, and became HEIR OF THE RIGHTEOUSNESS which is by
faith.

Heir of the righteousness - Noah would
not think it robbery to RECEIVE righteousness by faith since he has
been GIVEN it from the Father by the works of faith he did - he has
inherited it from the Father. Now, Noah was not literally begotten by
YHUH but Yah'ushua was begotten, in addition to being faithful,
so how much more is Yah'ushua then not to think of it as
robbery to be an Heir of Righteousness (equal with YHUH) by being BOTH
begotten AND faithful?

Heb 1:3 the express image of
his person( character and action) *dikaios- In righteousness-
right
standing with YHUH - equitible in character or in act - innnocent
- just

YHUH tells us to be perfect as He is
also perfect - we are to be equal with him - in equity of HIS CHARACTER
(which is fully righteous).

Gen17:1 And when Abram was ninety
years old and nine, YHUH appeared to Abram, and said unto him, I am the
Almighty Elohim; walk before me, and be thou perfect*.

The Father, on the other hand, is
blasphemed by what the lawless (unrighteous) son of Satan does since he
does not hear To'rah or do it.

John 8:42 If YHUH is your Father (as
indeed He can be), ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came
from YHUH; neither came I of myself, but he sent me. 43 Why do ye not
understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word (To'rah). 44
Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will
do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth,
because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, HE SPEAKETH
OF HIS OWN (speaking of his own Honour - pw GLORY): for he is a liar,
and the father of it.

True
kinship is fully realised when the Son does as the Father - this is
true
equality when there is agreement as the word "equal" denotes.

YOUR STATEMENT:

"I will not give... My praise to graven
images"

OUR RESPONSE:

Yah'ushua is not a graven
image
but made in the image of YHUH by YHUH and brought out of YHUH
(conceived in the flesh by Miriam, pw Mary), so that also is not
blasphemy,
since He truly is the Son of YHUH. YHUH remains the Majesty on High
whilst He commands all the malakhim (pw angels) (his other created
beings
who are one
with him and far more than just three), to worship the only begotten
Son. Note: they are clearly told to worship (SERVE) his begotten Son.
Heb 1:5-6. They are told to do this, as, in fact, it would not be
obvious to them to do so since he is NOT Elohim. Elohim would
need to make
such a decree as it would be self evident if He were referring to
himself, but he is NOT. Worship is a word that has a wide spectrum of
meanings and the English translation falls short of the actual degree
of the meaning. It certainly does not mean we replace Yah'uah Elohim
with Yah'ushua and worship him above his Father or in a way that goes
against the Father's commands. That would not be honouring the SOn or
the Father. Honouring is the idea conveyed here rather than worship.
While it states honour your father and mother in the scriptures the
word could likewsie be distorted by using worship your father and
mother. Most would obviously protest against such a use of the meaning
it is understood to mean honour. Likewise when it come to the
Messiah we honour him as he is appointed by Yah'uah his Father, we do
not worship him the fullest sense of worship which can only be
attributed to Yah'uah.

YOUR STATEMENT:

Also, Yah'ushua
said, "...Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am."
(John 8:58) Here is the context: "Your father Abraham rejoiced to see
my day: and he saw it, and was glad. Then said the Jews unto him, Thou
art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? Jesus said
unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.
Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and
went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed
by. The word "am" in Greek eimi means to exist. Also
stated from http://biblehub.com/greek/1510.htm: 1510eimí (the basic Greek verb which expresses being, i.e. "to
be") – am, is. 1510 (eimí), and its counterparts, (properly) convey
"straight-forward" being (existence, i.e. without explicit limits).

Before this verse, in John
8:24, Yah'ushua says "I said therefore unto you, that ye shall
die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in
your sins. Notice that he said "I am he". The word “he” isn't in the
original Greek. So he further goes on to clarify to the Jews what he
meant here by telling them before Abraham, he already existed.

OUR RESPONSE:

By denying that Yah'ushua is
YHUH, and rather declaring that he is His Son, as revealed by
scripture, does not in any way deny Yah'ushua's pre-existence in the
shamayim (pw heavenlies) before He became flesh. This time is what
scripture calls
the beginning of our time in this present shamayim (pw heaven) and
earth). So He
would have been revealed to Abraham in our time.

Note: Adam was made in the IMAGE of
YHUH and the woman was brought out of the man (Adam) for man's purpose
and for the honour (pw glory) of man. The man is not the woman but the
woman was
with(in) the man before she was made flesh and brought out of his side.
Likewise, Yah'ushua was brought out of YHUH. Now, to say the
man IS woman would be a problem (we now see that causing havoc in
society today with feminism) and this is exactly what society does
through the trinity heresy, saying Yah'ushua IS YHUH.

Jn 7:28 Ye both know me, and ye know
whence I am (exist): and I am NOT come of myself, but he that SENT me
is true.

Now, Yah'ushua was brought out
of YHUH for YHUH's honour (pw glory) and purpose. Eve had no say in her
existence
and was not sent (or brought forth) of her own accord, neither was
Yah'ushua. Adam was already in existence before Eve. YHUH was already
in
existence before Yah'ushua, but Yah'ushua only came to be
begotten at the beginning of time, just as Adam did.

The Word was made flesh - the potential
of Yah'ushua was already in the spirit of YHUH, for YHUH is
Spirit. So, by the spirit of his Word (thoughts, intentions, plans,
guidelines, instructions) YHUH begot Yahushua in the flesh through
Miriam.

Jn 20:17 Touch me not; for I am not
yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I
ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my Elohim, and your
Elohim.

If Yah'ushua says YHUH is his
Elohim, and YHUH is my Elohim, then why would I rely on what other
pagan churches (circe-circus, goddess of destruction, Kali ) fathers in
Nicae said hundreds of years after our Messiah, when Yah'ushua
said it before they came along, and said it even though He pre-existed
in Abraham's time? This means all the more that Yah'ushua, the Son, had
YHUH as his Elohim in Abraham's time as well, and would have declared
the very same thing to Abraham if He were then already in the flesh
(but Yah'ushua was not yet in the flesh).

Now, was not Satan also present with
Adam and Eve as the serpent - did he not exist - could he also not say,
since Adam was I am ( I existed)? Could we then be foolish to say Satan
is Elohim (pw God) since he claims a “since Abraham was I am”?

Why would we try to find obscure verses
like "I am", which the Roman centurion said as well in normal
sentences, and attempt to make these some sort of mysterious pronoun "I
AM", when YHUH's name is any case is present continous, I Will Be What
I Will Be.

Rom 3:4 Let all men be found to be
liars and YHUH be true.

Num 23:19 YHUH is NOT a man, that he
should lie; NEITHER the son of man, that he should repent..."

Meditate on that verse for 10 minutes.
YHUH does not lie - He is NOT a man, period!

But what are men doing?

Trinity doctrine says
that Yah'ushua IS fully "God" AND IS fully man.

Men are indeed lying that YHUH is a
man. In fact, they go a step further by saying that the man is YHUH.

Yahushua was begotten of YHUH
and made flesh, ie. Yah'ushua IS NOW a man and so He
remains - a man (first begotten) purified by YHUH. Yahuah remains as He
always has and will be, Spirit. Our bodies will also be quickened as
Yahushua's was and we shall be begotten sons of YHUH upon the first
resurrection when Yahushua returns.

That is why the Son bears the Father
YHUH's name, as he does everything by Yah's authority - this is Hebraic
understanding.

Jn 12:49 For I
have not spoken of
myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I
should say, and what I should speak.

John 5:31 If I bear witness of
myself, my witness is not true.

Yah'ushua is the messenger and
the initiator of YHUH's wishes - the WORD made flesh.

The subject or contention here in John
is the testimony of two or three witnesses, as required by To'rah for a
true witness, as opposed to only one witness. The Scribes and Pharisess
had just brought a woman supposedly accused of adultery WITHOUT any
witnesses which is against To'rah. "Woman, where are those thine
accusers? hath no man condemned thee? "The whole issue here is about
bearing false witness, which they then have the cheek to try and pin
onto Yah'ushua as an accusation against Him, that He, himself
is a false witness since He is alone in what He claims about being a
shining light on their evil misuse of the law. (It is what we often get
accused of as believers when we use the authority of scripture to judge
others in their error or sin). Yah'ushua immediately says He
does not speak alone but by the law.

Jn 8:16 And yet if I judge, my
judgment is true: for I am not alone, but I AND the Father that sent
me. 17 It is also written in your law, that the testimony of two men is
true. 18 I am ONE that bear witness of myself, and the Father that sent
me beareth witness of me.

Here we can see that Yah'ushua
can do math, unlike trinitarians who claim Jesus IS God, ie. ONE and
the
same thing. If two witnesses are required, and Yah'ushua is
one and the same, ie. YHUH, then Yah'ushua's very argument would be a
bit stupid as He would still be one witness. Instead, He says he is not
ALONE and there are TWO witnesses. So, if saying "I am he", supposedly
is to mean "I am YHUH", it would make him one and the same single
witness and He would still need another.

In verse 28 Yah'ushua therefore
reminds the trinitarians of the Shama (the Master our YHUH is one
Elohim), and that He is not left alone - He is the Son, with the Father.

So :

Son
+ Father = 2 witnesses

(full
marks for maths, gives a truly legal witness)

But:

Son = YHUH = 1 witness

(makes maths a lie, and
worse, Yah'ushua's witness becomes a lie by To'rah standards - ie.
short
of 1 or more witnesses).

If YHUH were one and the same, as
Yah'ushua, He would be breaking his very own To'rah - YHUH would be a
false witness transgressing His own law and Yah'ushua would be
a sinner - a defiled offering (pw sacrifice) - we would all be doomed.

Ex 20:16 Thou shalt not bear false
witness against thy neighbour.

Heb 10:28 He that despised Moses' law
died without mercy under two or three witnesses:

ITim5:19 Against an elder receive not
an accusation, but before two or three witnesses.

II Corninthians 13:1 1 This is the
third time I am coming to you. In the mouth of two or three witnesses
shall every word be established.

Deut 19:15 One witness shall not rise
up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he
sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three
witnesses, shall the matter be established. 16 If a false witness rise
up against any man to testify against him that which is wrong; 17 Then
both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall stand before YHUH,
before the priests and the judges, which shall be in those days; 18 And
the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness
be a false witness, and hath testified falsely against his brother; 19
Then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to have done unto his
brother: so shalt thou put the evil away from among you.

Now, please bear with me as we continue
on this very fact:

Mat 26:59 Now the chief priests, and
elders, and all the council, SOUGHT FALSE WITNESS against Yah'ushua, to
put him to death; 60 BUT FOUND NONE: yea, though MANY FALSE WITNESSES
CAME, YET FOUND THEY NONE. At the last came TWO FALSE WITNESSES, 61 And
said, This fellow said, I am able to destroy the temple of YHUH, and to
build it in three days. 62 And the high priest arose, and said unto
him, Answerest thou nothing? what is it which these witness against
thee? 63 But Yah'ushua held his peace. And the high priest
answered and said unto him, I adjure thee by the living YHUH, that thou
TELL US WHETHER THOU BE THE MESSIAH, THE SON OF YHUH.
64 Yah'ushua saith unto him, Thou hast said: (IE. CORRECT, I
AM SON OF YHUH, NOT YHUH.) nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall
ye see the Son of MAN sitting on the right hand of power (STILL NOT
SAYING HE IS YHUH BUT SITTING ON HIS RIGHT HAND), and coming in the
clouds of shamayim (pw heaven). 65 Then the high priest rent his
clothes, saying, He
hath spoken blasphemy; what further need have we of witnesses? Behold,
now ye have heard his blasphemy.

Note: the first false accusation
against Yah'ushua is, He will destroy and rebuild the Temple
(but we know
He referred to the destruction and rebuilding of the flesh - body of
believers, in his
body, and the spiritual resurrection thereby). The House of
Yahuah was destroyed much
later in +/-70AD due to their own disobedience. Then the
second
accusation of blasphemy, saying that He, HIMSELF,
alone allegedly claimed to be SON
OF YHUH, when He is, in fact ,NOT alone in
his claim / witness - he has YHUH as second witness. The accusation is
not that He says He is YHUH, and we know He certainly does not make
such a claim. What they do is ignore Yah'ushua's most legal witness,
and that is YHUH himself through His To'rah and the prophets, referring
to
the time of the coming of the Son of YHUH and his works. The high
priest now bears false witness by saying, he has no need of further
witnesses, when, in fact, by To'rah he does - he requires two or more
witnesses to disprove Yah'ushua's claim that He is the Son of YHUH, or
that He has turned the people away from To'rah to serve another Elohim.
Instead, the priest goes against To'rah and simply says, no further
need
of witnesses. This is an unfair lawless trial for which the false
accusers, according to To'rah, should be
punished with the same punishment and be tortured on the stake like
Messiah.

The very contention with the Jews was a
continual attempt to accuse Yah'ushua of blasphemy, for which
the legal right by To'rah is capital punishment, death. Over and over
again the blasphemy was not that Yah'ushua was saying he was
YHUH but that He was saying He was the Son of YHUH, and that they were
attempting to accuse him of making this statement ALONE and without
another witness to confirm it.

Amongst other things, blasphemy is when
one either claims to be YHUH or tries to replace him or speaks / acts
against his To'rah. Most Christendom today does all of that by twisting
Apostle Paul's words (we are not under the law). In fact, Stephen and
Paul were similarly falsely accused in scripture of being against the
law. These false accusers began the fable that Yah'ushua had come to
change the law. They made this false accusation of Stephen so he could
be stoned. Now, today, Christianity continues their lie.

Acts 6:13 And set up FALSE
witnesses, which said, This man ceaseth not to speak blasphemous words
against this holy place, and the law: 14 For we
have heard
him say, that this Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) of Nazareth shall destroy this
place, and
shall change the customs which Moses delivered us.

No such thing had been said! So Yah'ushua makes it
plain he
is Messiah. But their unbelief causes dull hearing and false
accusations.

John10:24 Then came the Jews round
about him, and said unto him, How long dost thou make us to doubt? If
thou be the Messiah, tell us plainly. 25 Yah'ushua answered
them, I told you, and ye believed not: the works
that I do in
my Father's name, they bear witness of me. 26 But ye believe not,
because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you. 27 My sheep hear my
voice, and I know them, and they follow me: 28 And I give unto them
eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck
them out of my hand. 29 My Father, which gave them me, IS
GREATER THAN ALL; and no man
is able to pluck them out of my
Father's hand. 30 I and my Father are one. 31 Then the Jews took up
stones again to stone him. 32 Yah'ushua answered them, Many
good works have I shewed you FROM MY FATHER; for which of those works
do ye stone me? 33 The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we
stone thee not;...

Here we see that Yah'ushua's witness is
Deuteronomy 13 - the works of YHUH - to obey His To'rah and not lead
men
astray to serve another god (in other words J-Zeus, Jesus is god, god
incarnate) by lying signs and
wonders. Incarnation or re-incarnation are all pagan terminology and
pagan concepts.

John 10:33 continuing … but for
blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself YHUH.

Now, again, we see that they make a
false accusation. Yah'ushua has just said that He has already
told them before that He is their Messiah (not YHUH!).

So what is Yah'ushua's answer? Surely
when someone does not understand you make it plain to them who you are?
Does He
claim to be YHUH or the Son of YHUH?

John 10:34 Yah'ushua
answered them, Is it not written in your law, I (YHUH speaking) said,
Ye are gods? 35 If he (YHUH) called them gods, unto whom the word of
YHUH came, and the scripture cannot be broken; 36 Say ye of
him (Yah'ushua), whom the Father hath purified, and sent into the
world,
Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son OF YHUH?

No,
instead He makes the argument that they are falsely accusing him of
blaspheming since He is saying He is the Son of Yahuah, not Yahuah,
something totally different and something already prophesied in the
law,
which they should be reading to judge him correctly.

Many have a misunderstanding due to the
problem with translation since "gods" here is refering to judge,
magistrate, malakh (pw angel) meaning messenger - someone who
can decide between
right and wrong - ie. judge a case. Moses would have been such a man as
well, a messenger of To'rah and judging cases under it.
So Yah'ushua does not say he is YHUH but He emphatically says
“I said I am the SON OF YHUH” and He uses what YHUH has declared for
the children of the Most High, that they are eloha (magistrates - able
to discern between good and evil by To'rah), as written in Psalms that
He is quoting.

Psalms 82:1 Elohim standeth in the
congregation of El; he judgeth among the elohim. 2 How long
will ye JUDGE UNJUSTLY, and accept the persons of the wicked?
Selah. 3 Defend the poor and fatherless: do justice to the
afflicted and needy. 4 Deliver the poor and needy: rid them
out of the hand of the wicked. 5 They know not, neither will
they understand; they walk on in darkness: all the foundations of the
earth are out of course. I have said, Ye are eloha (sons of YHUH); and
all of you are children of the most High. 7 But ye shall die like men,
and fall like one of the princes. 8 Arise, O YHUH, judge the earth: for
thou shalt inherit all nations.

Notice, it is all about judging
righteously, Yah is the judge above all the judges / magistrates (pw
g-o-ds") even those
who judge unjustly - Messiah was calling the sanhedrin out when He made
reference to this verse - they would have known this section. They were
judging him unjustly, making him out to be claiming to be Elohim (pw
God).

John 10:37 If I do not the works of
my Father, believe me not. 38 But if I do, though ye believe not me,
believe the works: that ye may know, and believe, that the Father is in
me, and I in him.

So, in summary, in case you
missed it the first time:

1) False accusation:

John10:33 ...thou, being a man,
MAKEST THYSELF GOD (ELOHIM).

2) Correct answer:

Thou blasphemest; BECAUSE I SAID I AM
THE SON OF GOD (ELOHIM)?

Note how the false accusation in John
10:33 is different to a statement the Pharisees had made 5 chapters
earlier

Jn
5:18 but said also that Elohim was his Father, making himself equal
with Elohim.

This of course was a correct deduction
to make and scripturally it is of course correct.

Phil 2:6 Who, being in the form of
Elohim, thought it not robbery to be equal with Elohim

It is blatantly clear that the truth was stretched, from being equal in
kinship to then suddenly being Elohim himself 5 chapters
later.
This
exaggeration, lie and false accusation progressed in the development
of the pagan Catholic church and her diluted Catholic pagan Protestant
sister churches as they conjured up an accusation that makes Yah'ushua
appear
to make himself Elohim (pw God) when it is they themselves who
create
their
own J-Zeus /Jesus god. The result is then that they take the
next giant step to the pit, saying, Mary, Mother of God. This pagan
idolatry nauseates any true To'rah-keeping believer in the everlasting
covenant.

So Yah'ushua is doing the
works, and therefore, they should believe on Him as the Son of YHUH as
He is discerning more perfectly between good and evil by the Spirit of
the Father. He is fulfilling the law (carrying it out), and that is why
He says, as a Son of YHUH (First Begotten), they should believe Him by
his WORKS (To'rah OBEDIENCE), as a true Son of YHUH as he is leading
men
TO YHUH's To'rah, not away from it. Yah'ushua passes the
Deuteronomy 13 test.

Some erroneously think "works" here are
signs and wonders (miracles) but they are not. Deuteronomy 13 places no
weight on
miracles but rather uses them to test followers of blasphemers
(False Messiahs) who turn men away from YHUH's To'rah (guidelines and
instructions of Genesis - Revelations) by signs and
wonders. Yah'ushua himself said, an evil generation seeks
signs.

Now, to think the gods he is referring
to in Psalm 82 here refers to immortality in men is a grave mistake,
excuse the pun, since the very definition of these gods in Psalm 82
comes with the condition of mortality, verse 7 But ye shall
die like men. Even though we are all originally the (vs 6) children of
the Most High, we have fallen and die because of sin. This heresy of
"little gods" while not under To'rah is rampant in the Word of Faith
Movement. They too shall die like mortal men and be resurrected to
destruction, not eternal life, as they are lawless and see Messiah as
an idol, the immortal Elohim (pw God), when He is not.

Thus Messiah is properly a Magistrate judging and bringing the
To'rah. He also died a mortal death like any man and the more so as he
bore all our sins, and it is Yahuah who raises him up on the third day.
He is no Elohim (pw God) but the Son of Elohim (pw God), and we,
through the resurrection of the
mortal Yah'ushua by Yahuah the Father, have also been given the power
to
BECOME the SONS OF ELOHIM by that resurrection on that day when He
returns.

So the ultimate end result is that we become SONS of ELOHIM not ELOHIM,
the same applied to Yah'ushua he was the FIRST begotten Son of Elohim.

YOUR QUESTION:

Who created all things?
Did God (YHUH)? Isaiah 44:24 says

"Thus saith the Lord, thy
redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the Lord that
maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the shamayim (pw heaven)s
ALONE; that
spreadeth abroad the earth BY MYSELF;"

If God is the only
creator of all things by himself, then why does Colosians 1:15-17 state
this:

Who is the
image of the invisible Elohim (pw God), the firstborn of every
creature: "For by him were all things created, that are in shamayim (pw
heaven), and
that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or
dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by
him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things
consist."

Who is these verses talking about? The
him is
namely Yah'ushua because in context the verses talk about him
as "the image of the invisible Elohim (pw God)".

The verses go on further
to state in verse 19

"For it pleased the Father that in him
should all
fulness dwell;"

Who created everything? God (YHUH). But
haven't I shown
that Yah'ushua is said to have
created all things.

OUR
RESPONSE:

Sadly you have not shown
that Yah'ushua created all things but rather assumed that the
“Him” in “For by Him were all things created” is referring to Yah'ushua
when the context is indeed referring to Yahuah in the sentence.

If it were, then the verse would be
saying that “He”, the FIRSTBORN, created everything. This would mean
that something that is born (has a beginning) is
self-existent.
That is impossible. YHUH, the
Creator, was not born. A clear contradiction.

"Thus
saith YHUH-the self existent one (pw theLord), thy
redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the YHUH-the self existent one (pw
theLord) that
maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the shamayim (pw heaven)s
ALONE; that
spreadeth abroad the earth BY MYSELF;"

He has just said that He
is the beginning of every creature, created being. Messiah is that
created being-begotten.

Yes,
Messiah is the image of the invisible Elohim. This further proves he is
not Elohim since He is created in His image, as was Adam, and thus so
are
we. Hence, Messiah is the last Adam made
(created by Elohim) with a quickening spirit (1 Cor 15:45 )

This is why the translators at least
got that part right when they placed a colon in the sentence since the
“: For by him” refers to the invisible YHUH that was referred to in the
sentence. The image is always created, just as Adam was created in the
image OF YHUH. The image is not the original self-existent YHUH. An
image is always a later consequence of the original substance thought,
idea, etc. that proceeds from the original. So Yah'ushua
proceeds as the image out of YHUH's self-existence.

The eternal cannot die – Yah'ushua, as
man, died and was resurrected by the eternal Father. If Yah'ushua, the
man, were able to raise Himself then He would never have died in the
first place.

1Cor 6:14 And YHUH hath both raised
up the Master (Yah'ushua), and will also raise up us by his OWN power.

“For by HIM" refers to the
invisible Elohim, not the image (Yah'ushua). Like Eve was created FOR
ADAM, Yah'ushua was begotten FOR YHUH, and then YHUH gave away
his begotten Son because He so loved the world. You can't give yourself
but say you gave your son, that would simply be a lie. YHUH is not a
liar. The image of YHUH is not YHUH. Yah'ushua said two
seemingly
contradictory things:

He said:

John 14:9 “He that hath seen me
hath
seen the Father”

Seen
what? the express image of His person (as stated
in Hebrews) - the works and words of To'rah, not YHUH Himself, eg. His
face etc.

Further:

John 15:23 He that hateth me hateth
my Father also.

John 15:24 If I had not done among
them the works which none other MAN did, they had not had sin: but now
have they both seen and hated both me and my Father.

Yah'ushua also stated, what is
erroneously seen as contradictory:

1 Jn 4:20 If a man say, I love YHUH,
and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his
brother whom he hath seen, how can he love YHUH whom he hath NOT SEEN?

In this verse Yah'ushua is
stating He is not YHUH himself
physically or in any other way.

So Yah'ushua is categorically
NOT the invisible Father since no MAN has seen YHUH, this plainly
shows Yah'ushua is not YHUH as He is standing right before
their eyes speaking this verse.

Further:

Heb 10:12 But this MAN (Yah'ushua),
after he had offered one offering (pw sacrifice) for sins for ever, sat
down on the
right hand of YHUH; [the still unseen (but to be seen in the future)
invisible YHUH].

YOUR NEXT QUESTION:

"If this isn't enough proof, let's look
at Isaiah 45:21-23,

"Tell ye, and bring them near; yea, let them
take
counsel together: who hath declared this from ancient time? who hath
told it from that time? have not I the Lord? and there is no Elohim (pw
God) else
beside me; a just Elohim (pw God) and a Saviour; there is none beside
me. Look unto
me, and be ye saved, all the ends of the earth: for I am Elohim (pw
God), and there
is none else. I have sworn by myself, the word is gone out of my mouth
in righteousness, and shall not return, That unto me every knee shall
bow, every tongue shall swear.

First, Who is savior but God (YHUH)
alone?

Isaiah 43:11, "I, even I, am the Lord;
and beside me there is no saviour."

But does scripture
call Jesus savior. Luke states in verse 11 that Christ is
our savior:

"For unto you
is born this day in the city of David a
Saviour, which is Messiah (pw Christ) the Lord." Even the Samaritans
said this: "And
said unto the woman, Now we believe, not because of thy saying: for we
have heard him ourselves, and know that this is indeed the Messiah (pw
Christ), the
Saviour of the world."

OUR RESPONSE:

The correct translation is

Isaiah 43:11,
"I, even I, am YAHUAH (pw LORD);
and beside me there is no salvation."

Your
translation has Lord, implying, Master, when it should be LORD. When
LORD
is there it means the original "YHUH" - the self-existent one, Yahuah
should be there. "Lord"
leaves doubt as to whether we are referring to Master Yah'ushua or
Master Yahuah here. But LORD, although a pagan translation it makes it
clear as to the always
translated tetragrammaton: YHUH, Yahuah alone. Secondly, your
translation uses saviour for Hebrew 3467 "yasha" but salvation is the
more correct all encompassing word here.

The
translators would have been well advised that this translation using
"saviour" would be contradictory since the prophet Nehemiah himself
refers to the many saviours that Yahuah has given and they were not
"gods" or ever considered "divine"

Neh
9:27 Therefore thou deliveredst them into the hand of their enemies,
who vexed them: and in the time of their trouble, when they cried unto
thee, thou heardest them from shamayim (pw heaven); and according to
thy manifold
mercies thou gavest them saviours, who saved them out of the hand of
their enemies.

Yah'ushua's
name, Yah Saves, refers
back to the fact that it is Yah who saves. In the same way, a son
receives the name of his father in the Hebraic manner, eg. Simon ben
Joseph (son of Joseph). Yah'ushua ben Elohim.

YHUH, the Father, saved us by the
giving of his gift, namely his saviour Son from shamayim (pw heaven).
YHUH is indeed the one who saves .
It was YHUH's favour /chesed (pw grace) that caused Him to
offer up
His son for us.

Now, it is the Word of Yahuah that is
salvation – doctrine, that
saves - Yah'ushua's blood, death and resurrection WITHOUT obedience to
the Word cannot save us, just as Yah'ushua could not save us
unless He obeyed the originator of our salvation, YHUH, through his
Word.

As an aside:

Luk 22:42 Saying, Father, if thou be
willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine,
be done.

Luk 22:43 And there appeared a malakh
(pw angel)
unto him from shamayim (pw heaven), strengthening him.

Luk 22:44 And being in an agony he
prayed more earnestly: and his sweat was as it were great drops of
blood falling down to the ground.

Yah'ushua obeyed YHUH fully as
a man, He felt the fear and anguish as a man, if He were YHUH how could
this be? Yah'ushua was showing human weakness and concerns
(not sin), but weakness which YHUH would
not have.

Yah'ushua came to preach
obedience to the Word – that, with His perfect offering (pw sacrifice),
is what saves
us. That is why He is the author and finisher of our emunah (pw faith)
(steadfast
moral conviction to obey). I do not speak heresy or blasphemy here
since Paul agrees:

1 Timothy 16 Take heed unto thyself,
and unto the DOCTRINE; continue in them: for in DOING this thou shalt
both SAVE thyself, and them that HEAR thee.

And the converse is true - it is wrong
doctrine that also sends men to Gehenna (pw hell), it is
called damnable heresy. Changing doctrine is what caused the original
sin in Eden. Correct doctrine is what restores what happened in Eden
and this is what the honour of Yah'ushua is.

II Peter 1 But there were false
prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers
among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even
denying (contradicting) YHUH that bought them, and bring upon
themselves
SWIFT DESTRUCTION.

There is only one Saviour of the world
and that is YHUH who provides saviours, and he provided the ultimate
SAVIOUR, Yah'ushua, the last Adam, the only saviour that was
to
save the whole world from sin for those who repent.

Noah was a saviour of his household by
faith - he also became the condemner of the world and HEIR OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS

Heb 11:7 By moral conviction (pw
faith) Noah, being warned
of YHUH of things not seen as yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark to
the saving of
his house; by the which he condemned the world,
and
became heir of the righteousness which is by emunah (steadfast moral
conviction to obey)(pw faith).

So we see that it is YHUH's Word that
saves men or it is the corruption of it that causes their destruction,
despite what Yah'ushua did on the execution stake.
Indeed, Yah'ushua came to save the world by his death, but it
is YHUH who saved Yah'ushua from death by raising Him, without
which no salvation would exist!

So when we DO and TEACH the WORD, as
Yah'ushua, the WORD made flesh, did and taught, we save others, and so,
indirectly, we are saviours by the favour and authority of YHUH. In
fact, as Paul says here, we become the saviour of others and ourselves.
This is in no way blasphemy since it is what scripture teaches. This is
the gospel commission after all.

Mat 28:18 And Yah'ushua came
and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in shamayim (pw
heaven) and
in earth. 19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, immersing
(pw baptizing) them in(to)
the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of pure spirit: 20 Teaching
them to observe (DO) ALL THINGS WHATSOEVER I HAVE COMMANDED YOU:

Take note that Yah'ushua again
makes it clear that he has been GIVEN all power over shamayim (pw
heaven) and earth.
Since shamayim (pw heaven) and earth has a beginning and end - Alpha
(Aleph) and
Omega (Tav), this power is actually loaned, or let's say
delegated. Yah'ushua cannot be given something unless he must
receive it from the self-existent Father YHUH from whence he was
begotten.

YOUR STATEMENT:

Also, Who do we bow our knee before?
God alone!

Philippians 2:10, "That at the name of
Yah'ushua (pw Jesus)
every knee
should bow, of things in shamayim (pw heaven), and things in earth, and
things under
the earth;"

Why would God allow us to bow before
Yah'ushua if
he wasn't God? -

"for I am
Elohim (pw God), and there is none else."

Then verse 11
says,

"And that
every tongue should confess that Yah'ushua (pw Jesus) Messiah (pw
Christ) is Master (pw Lord),
to the honour (pw glory) of Elohim (pw God) the Father."

OUR RESPONSE:

We bow to the Father (YHUH)
in the name of Yah'ushua when we pray:

Eph 3:14 For this cause I bow my
knees unto the Father OF our Master Yah'ushua Messiah, 15 Of
whom the whole family in shamayim (pw heaven) and earth is named, 16
That he would
grant you, according to the riches of his honour (pw glory), to be
strengthened
with might by his Spirit in the inner man;

However, when we are wicked and face
the Magistrate Yah'ushua, then we bow for a different reason:

As clearly stated, Yah'ushua is
appointed Magistrate by the Majesty on high. So, if we are wicked we
bow to
the judge Yah'ushua and to YHUH, the appointer of that
Magisrate.

Acts 17:31 Because he hath appointed
a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness BY that
MAN whom he hath ordained (appointed, decreed, limited to) whereof he
hath given assurance unto all men, in that HE (YHUH) hath raised
him(Yah'ushua) from the dead. (Yah'ushua did not raise himself since he
was man - a dead man, period!)

In the same way one calls the
Magistrate “My
Lord”, because he is acting under the Majesty of England lets say - so
it is with Yah'ushua. The emphasis is the name /authority,
not Yah'ushua
himself, - the name is the authority with which Yah'ushua
operates from YHUH's throne. If the Magistrate is appointed by the
Majesty
of the country the person addreses him because he bears the appointed
authority of the Majesty on his throne. It does not make the Magistrate
the
Majesty on High. When the appointed Magistrate, Yah'ushua,
puts the full penalty of YHUH's law (curse of the law-wages of sin and
death) upon the shoulders of the wicked, they will certainly bow
whether they like it or not. Every knee will bow, not in worship
here, but pure submission, whether willing or not, since He has been
appointed Magistrate. True worship requires obedience by free will,
that is the basis of true
worship - these people do not obey thus they are punished. Crying to
the
rocks "fall on us" (a
rock on you should make you bend your knees). Yahuah is the
Rock
and Messiah is the appointed Magistrate to bring that judgement to
crush the
rebellious.

Jn 6:16 And said to the mountains and
rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the
throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb: 17 For the great day of his
wrath is come; and who
shall be able to STAND?

Yah'ushua is indeed Master
(pw lord, lard, baali etc) in the same way the world addresses a
Magistrate as
with the pagan title "My Lord" in some countries - a respectful
title similar to Sir or
Mister, Doctor, Your Honour etc. Yes, some think they are Elohim (pw
God) as soon
as they get a title but these are carnal men. Yah'ushua is
not sinful flesh but full of YHUH's spirit - He did not have a Elohim
(pw God) complex.
He knew he was the Son of YHUH with the appointment of authority.

John 14:28 for my Father is greater
than I.

Yahuah
would certainly allow us to bow to the Master since He has so decreed
it from the foundation of the world. He did not say there is none other
than me to which you must not bow, He said, do not bow to graven
images,
do not make your own images of what has been created by Yahuah and
worship them as though they are All Mighty. Do not make representations
of what Yahuah has created and bow to those things as if they are
Sovereign powers. These are man-made images of what Yahuah has made.
Messiah has also been created by Yahuah himself, however as an image of
Yahuah himself. Messiah is not an idol but the pure representation of
the image of Yahuah by word and deed- a living representation, not a
man-made statue etc. This is why we were commanded not to make false
images and bow to them since they blaspheme the Father's own created
image he had prepared for us - his own Son, as prophesied, to which we
may
bow down, recognising him as the Sovereign's Son. So who are you to
question why we should be allowed to bow to him when He has decreed
that? What He has never decreed is that He be named and madeYahuah the
All Mighty One, yet that you do not question and rather wish to follow.
I continue to not bow to images or icons of Yah'ushua as commanded but
to the Son, as commanded, when He returns, in recognition of his
apointed
authority by his Father.

YOU FURTHER STATED:

“for I am God, and there is
none else." Then verse 11 says, "And that every tongue should confess
that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the honour (pw glory) of God the
Father." The word for Lord is kurios koo'-ree-os
from kuros
(supremacy); supreme in authority, i.e. (as noun) controller; by
implication, Master (as a respectful title):-- God, Lord, master, Sir.
So why would our confessing that Yah'ushua is Lord (kurios)
glorify God the Father?

OUR RESPONSE:

Simply because it confirms that YHUH
his Father raised him from the dead. If the immortal Father were not
there to raise the mortal (man) Messiah he would still be in the grave.
What a liar YHUH would be - where would His honour (pw glory) be if His
appointed advocate does not arrive on the day of justice but was still
sleeping in
the
grave? Satan would then be the Master (Lord) since death had not lost
its sting. Yah'ushua obeyed and suffered to the death and YHUH
raised him from death - thus was death for mortal MAN struck a blow.

Yah'ushua, yes, is supreme in authority
over shamayim (pw heaven) and earth - that is why the malakhim (pw
angels) must obey Him - He is
the head too over the assembly (pw church-circus) the body
of believers, in no way does this detract, or take away from YHUH's
honour (pw glory). It still brings honour to YHUH. Peter also made it
clear that
the same title of respect is applied to the husband or should be (but
today's standard has been corrupted by feminism and pagan thinking).

1 Pet 3:6 Even as Sara obeyed
Abraham, calling him Master (pw lord kurios): whose daughters ye are,
as long as ye do well, and are not afraid with any amazement. 7
Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them according to knowledge, giving
HONOUR unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel.

Note: the one in subjection has honour
(pw glory) GIVEN by commandment of YHUH and the woman gives honour to
the
husband above her. The same applies to chidren honouring parents.

Note: the honour(pw glory) is mentioned
and so is
the clear and precise order of Sovereignty to YHUH who is above all -
Majesty on High.

I wish for you to reflect
upon the
following for at least a week and try to apply the trinity doctrine to
it - the light of this scripture will expose the trinity doctrine for
what it causes – disorder and dishonour, it is contradictory to Pauls'
allegory:

1 Cor 11:3 But I would have you know,
that the HEAD of EVERY MAN is MESSIAH; and the HEAD of the woman is the
man; and the HEAD of MESSIAH is YHUH. 4 Every man praying or
prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head. 5 But
every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered
dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be
a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered. 7 For a
man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as HE IS THE IMAGE
AND HONOUR (pw glory) OF YHUH: but the WOMAN IS THE HONOUR (pw glory)
OF THE MAN. 8 For the man
is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. 9 Neither was the man
created for the woman; but the woman for the man. 10 For this cause
ought the woman to have power on her head because of the malakhim (pw
angels). 11
Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman
without the man, in YHUH. 12 For as the woman is of the man, even so is
the man also by the woman; but all things of YHUH.

I could write a 20 page sermon on this
deep passage that Paul gives us but I will try to make it short.

Trinitarians use the term “GODHEAD”
erroneously, whereas the above allegory clearly shows YHUH is SUPREME,
HEAD over all.

If it is in the correct order, as
ordained for the body of Messiah, then we have harmony with YHUH's
honour (pw glory).

The honour (pw glory) is not diminished
in any way
by the functions of each (male, female, Yah'ushua or YHUH) but
it all flows up to YHUH, thus ending with vs 12 “but all things of
YHUH”. YHUH has purposed the function and order and hierarchy for HIS
ultimate honour (pw glory).

However, if this order is corrupted by
Satan then YHUH is blasphemed, placing Yah'ushua as the
Supreme Head = YHUH, then Yah'ushua is no longer the mediator
between man and YHUH but this falsely created Supreme Head, and we
start having female deities like Mary coming along in Catholicism (or
Shakti, Isis, Queen of Heaven (Mother of God) etc) as mediatrixes
instead.

Paul is not a trinitarian but a true
Yahudi - worshipper of Yah (pagan derogatory word later invented - Jew,
misleading-contraction of Judaite) as in the Shama (which I follow too
as a worshipper of Yah, Yahudi).

1 Tim 2: 5 For there IS one YHUH
(shama), and one mediator between YHUH and men, the
MAN Yah'ushua Hamashiach;

I don't think I have to say it again
but just in case:

He is the MAN who is our mediator,
still, for us.

Yah'ushua is the only MAN that
has ascended to shamayim (pw heaven).

Jn
3: 13 And no MAN hath
ascended up to shamayim (pw heaven), but He (the MAN)
that came down from shamayim (pw heaven), even
the Son OF MAN which
IS in shamayim (pw heaven).

The Son of Man (last Adam) in shamayim
(pw heaven)
became the Son of YHUH as he was purified by YHUH, as we too can be,
through His Spirit.

Yah'ushua became the Son in
whom YHUH was well pleased as He learned obedience under temptation, in
every human way, yet did not sin.

Yah'ushua could not learn
something if He was all-knowing (omniscient, that is what YHUH is).

Yah'ushua also does not know
when his Father will send Him again for the Last Day.

Please get that doctrine written on
your heart.

Likewise, the existence of Eve was
already potentially contained in Adam (genetics - bone of my bone and
flesh of my flesh) by YHUH's Spirit (ruwach-breath of life) breathed
into Adam.

Note: that the man cannot / could not
exist without the woman, and the woman without the man.

It is almost as if Paul, inspired by
the spirit, was testifying to the trinitarians to come out of tri-unity
heresy here when he says

Eph 4:13 Till we all come in the
unity of the faith,

Not, till we all come into the
tri-unity
faith.

And then, what does he say right after
that, is the knowledge that we need for such a unity (as opposed to a
tri-unity), he says, it is the knowledge of the SON OF YHUH, ie.
acknowledging or realising that Yah'ushua Messiah came in the
flesh and is the Son of YHUH.

He does not stop there, he
says, as a play on words - unto a perfect MAN (as the Son of YHUH is),
not a perfect god,unto the measure of the
stature and fullness of Messiah.

It cannot be any clearer, Paul clearly
states here what the Messiah spirit of unity is, as opposed to what the
anti-Messiah spirit is

2 John 1:7 For many deceivers are
entered into the world, who confess not that Messiah Yah'ushua
IS COME in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an anti-Messiah.

Note: MANY deceivers - so the majority
of so-called believers are deceived by such a Jesus Christ is Elohim
(pw God)
(Spirit), rather than He is flesh doctrine.

Note:also
IS COME*,* not CAME, ie. present imperfect
tense - erchomai

1 John 4:2 Hereby know ye the Spirit
OF YHUH: Every spirit that confesseth that Yah'ushua Messiah
IS COME in the flesh is OF YHUH:

Again, erchomai, present imperfect
tense,
since the Son remains the purified Messiah in the flesh and returns as
such.

Further:

2Jn 1:9 Whosoever transgresseth, and
abideth not in the doctrine of Messiah (pw Christ), hath not Elohim (pw
God). He that abideth in
the doctrine of Messiah (pw Christ), he hath both the Father
and the Son.
10 If there come any unto you,
and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither
bid him Elohim (pw God) speed: 11 For he that biddeth him Elohim (pw
God)
speed is partaker of his evil deeds.

YOUR STATEMENT:

Further, Isaiah 7:14 say
this, "Therefore the YHUH (pw LORD) himself shall give you a sign;
Behold, a
virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name
Immanuel." Immanuel means God is with us. So
let's look at prophesy fulfilled. "Behold, a
virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall
call His name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, Elohim (pw God)
with us."
(Matthew 1:23)

RESPONSE:

Yes, YHUH is truly with us (those who
are loyally covenanted to him) and it was
prophesied that YHUH had not forsaken His people - that He would renew
his everlasting covenant, and the action of Yah'ushua is to
indeed bring YHUH to us - called spirit of reconciliation:

2 Cor 5:19 To wit, that YHUH was in
Messiah (my comment - as He now should be in us), reconciling the world
unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath
committed unto us the word of reconciliation. 20 Now then we are
ambassadors for Messiah, as though YHUH did beseech you by us: we pray
you in Messiah (pw Christ)'s stead, be ye reconciled to YHUH (my
comment - so that
YHUH is within you ).

Do we actually see anybody
calling Yah'ushua Emmanuel? Well, not clearly in Greek
translation - I believe Paul made reference to Emmanuel, but before we
get there :

1 John 4:2 Hereby know ye the Spirit
of YHUH: Every spirit that confesseth that Yah'ushua Messiah
is come in the flesh is of YHUH:

Rom 8:29 For whom he did foreknow, he
also did predetermine (pw predestinate) to be conformed to the
image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn AMONG MANY brethren.
30 Moreover whom he did predetermine, them he also called: and whom he
called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, THEM HE ALSO
MADE HONOURABLE (pw glorified)-

their honour (pw glory) does not
detract from YHUH but points to YHUH.

Paul then says:

Rom8:31 What shall we then say to
these things? If YHUH be for us, who can be against us?

YHUH
Be For Us

El
for Us

El
with us

Emannuel.

So this conforming to the image of the
Son of YHUH is what gives Yah'ushua the name Emmanuel, or the
authority for us to say YHUH is with us and not against us, since we
are also given the power to become the sons of YHUH.

Note: if YHUH is not for or with us
then
we do not get chastised as sons and we are bastards.

Heb 12:7 If ye endure chastening,
YHUH dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father
chasteneth not? 8 But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are
partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.

Rev 3:19 As many as I love, I rebuke
and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.

What chastisement did Yah'ushua
receive - the highest - for our sins - why? Because he was the Son who
was bruised for our inquities. The Father cannot receive the
chastisement - the Father gives the chastisement. If Yah'ushua
is The Father then He was self-flagellating Himself at the execution
stake - a Catholic doctrine again, some sort of pagan penance.
Self-abuse is condemned:

1 Cor 6:9 Know ye not that the
unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of YHUH? Be not deceived:
neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor
ABUSERS OF THEMSELVES with mankind.

Lev 19:28 Ye shall not make any
cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am
YHUH.

Yes, sadly we have the Graeco-Roman
translation to thank for their
anti-Hebrew slant of scriptures again. If we look at some names in our
Hebrew scriptures, since salvation is of the
Yahudim (pw Jews), and not the Greeks or Romans etc, then we get a
fuller
understanding of YHUH, Yahuah (Yah) given names that bear His own
name. The names always point TO YHUH (Yah), it does not make the holder
of that name YHUH himself:

Joshua
- Real Name is YAH'ushua= “YAH is Salvation"
(this is the same name of Messiah NOT JESUS)

Samuel-
Real Name is ShamAHuel= “Listen to YAH your Eloah”

Isaiah-
Real Name is YeshaYAHU= “Salvation is YAH”

Jeremiah-
Real Name is YirmeYAHU= “The Resurrection/Rising is YAH”

Ezekiel-
Real Name is YAHchezqel= “YAH is a Righteous Eloah”

Daniel-
Real Name is DaniYAHel “The decision is YAH's our Eloah”

Hosea-
Real Name is HosheAH= “The Deliver is YAH”

Joel-
Real Name is YAHel= “YAH is Eloah”

Amos-
Real Name is AHmoce= “YAH’s Burden”

Obadiah-
Real Name is ObadYAHU= “The Servant of YAH”

Jonah-
Real Name is YonAH= “YAH provides Warmth”

Micah-
Real Name is MiykahYAHU= “Who is like YAH”

Nahum-
Real Name is NachUm= “Comfort comes from YAH”

Habakkuk-
Real Name is ChabaqUq= “Embrace YAH”

Zephaniah-
Real Name is TsphanYAHU= “The Secret is YAH”

Haggai-
Real Name is ChaggaYAH= “The Celebration is YAH”

Zechariah-
Real Name is ZacharYAHU= “YAH Remembers”

Malachi-
Real Name is MalakiYAH= “Messenger of YAH”

Job-
Real Name is YAHshub= “YAH Will Return”

Ezra-
Real Name is EzrAH= “Our Help is YAH”

Nehemiah-
Real Name is NechemYAH= “Consoled by YAH”

Matthew-
Real Name is MatithYAHU= “The gift is YAH”

Mark-
Real Name is MarkU= “Man of YAH”

Luke-
Real Name is LukAH= “The Light is YAH”

John-
Real Name is YAHUchanon= “YAH is Favour”

Timothy-
Timotheos= “Dear to ELOAH”

James-
Real Name is YAHcob= “YAH rises up”

Peter-
Real Name is KephAH= “The Rock is YAH”

Jude-
Real Name is YAHUdAH= “YAH’s Worshipers and Followers”

YOUR STATEMENT:

I still believe that Yah'ushua
has to be God (YHUH) to forgive sins. The Jews said in their heart
when Yah'ushua said your sins are forgiven, who can forgive
sins except for God. -Luke 5:20-22, "And when he saw their faith, he
said unto him, Man, thy sins are forgiven thee. And the scribes and the
Pharisees began to reason, saying, Who is this which speaketh
blasphemies? Who can forgive sins, but God alone?" (And, behold, they
brought to him a man sick of the palsy, lying on a bed: and Jesus
seeing their faith said unto the sick of the palsy; Son, be of good
cheer; thy sins be forgiven thee.And, behold, certain of the scribes
said within themselves, This man blasphemeth. - Matthew 9)

RESPONSE:

Now, did not Yah'ushua give us
similar authority to forgive men their sins who directly offend us and
who repent directly to us. Did He not say if we do not forgive men
their sins then neither will your Father in shamayim (pw heaven)
forgive you.

Now, since Yah'ushua is of the
order of High Priest as well, He has the same authority. Now, how did
the Levitical Priest forgive men their sins? By the authority given to
them by YHUH in the temple. Let's look:

Leviticus
4:35
And he shall take away
all the fat thereof, as the fat of the lamb is taken away from the
offering (pw sacrifice) of the peace offerings; and the priest shall
burn them upon
the altar, according to the offerings made by fire unto YHUH: and the
PRIEST SHALL MAKE AN ATONEMENT FOR HIS SIN THAT HE HATH COMMITTED, AND
IT SHALL BE FORGIVEN HIM.

Remember, He prayed: forgive them for
they know not what they do. All authority was in prayer to the
Father for the forgiveness of other's sins.

The Pharisees did not
know Yah'ushua is of the order of Melchizedek, and so they
were in blasphemy for not recognising the authority of the Priest
Yah'ushua, who is Himself the living offering (pw sacrifice) of
atonement for us.
The Pharisees were always claiming blasphemy only because they did not
accept the authority given to Yah'ushua by YHUH. They wanted
to be the big authority in town and had forgotten to follow the To'rah
and the prophets.

If you knew you would be the offering
(pw sacrifice)
for atonement, you, indeed, could forgive sins since you are the one
who is taking every one of those sins upon your own head, so it was for
Yah'ushua.

Did these people who came
to Yah'ushua not repent directly to Yah'ushua, knowing that
they had offended Him and his Father, in that the Son of YHUH would
have to take their sins on Himself?

Remember, that the man is head over the
woman, so now lets apply To'rah - see if you can apply this to what I
said about Yah'ushua being given authority over every man:

Num 30: 2 If a man vow a vow unto
YHUH, or swear an oath to bind his soul with a bond; he shall not break
his word, he shall do according to all that proceedeth out of his
mouth. 3 If a woman also vow a vow unto YHUH, and bind herself by a
bond, being in her father's house in her youth; 4 And her father hear
her vow, and her bond wherewith she hath bound her soul, and her father
shall hold his peace at her: then all her vows shall stand, and every
bond wherewith she hath bound her soul shall stand. 5 But if her father
disallow her in the day that he heareth; not any of her vows, or of her
bonds wherewith she hath bound her soul, shall stand: and YHUH shall
forgive her, because her father disallowed her. 6 And if she had at all
an husband, when she vowed, or uttered ought out of her lips, wherewith
she bound her soul; 7 And her husband heard it, and held his peace at
her in the day that he heard it: then her vows shall stand, and her
bonds wherewith she bound her soul shall stand. 8 But if her husband
disallowed her on the day that he heard it; then he shall make her vow
which she vowed, and that which she uttered with her lips, wherewith
she bound her soul, of none effect: and YHUH SHALL FORGIVE HER. 9 But
every vow of a widow, and of her that is divorced, wherewith they have
bound their souls, shall stand against her. 10 And if she vowed in her
husband's house, or bound her soul by a bond with an oath; 11 And her
husband heard it, and held his peace at her, and disallowed her not:
then all her vows shall stand, and every bond wherewith she bound her
soul shall stand. 12 But if her husband hath utterly made them void on
the day he heard them; then whatsoever proceeded out of her lips
concerning her vows, or concerning the bond of her soul, shall not
stand: her husband hath made them void; and YHUH SHALL FORGIVE HER. 13
Every vow, and every binding oath to afflict the soul, her husband may
establish it, or her husband may make it void. 14 But if her husband
altogether hold his peace at her from day to day; then he establisheth
all her vows, or all her bonds, which are upon her: he confirmeth them,
because he held his peace at her in the day that he heard them. 15 But
if he shall any ways make them void after that he hath heard them; THEN
SHALL HE BEAR HER INQUITY

Yah'ushua loosed the inquity
from the broken vow (broken covenant through sin, between YHUH and her,
the bride, Israel ) but still bore that iniquity upon Himself, and
atoned as the offering (pw sacrifice), as the Lamb, Himself. Yah'ushua,
as the head
man over every man, had authority to say "your sins are forgiven" as He
made the broken covenant itself void, and renewed it by his death. (Rom
7-8)

This similar authority regarding
covenant and the applied law has been extended to the men who recognise
Messiah as their head.

Mat16:19 And I will give unto thee
the keys of the kingdom of shamayim (pw heaven): and whatsoever thou
shalt bind on
earth shall be bound in shamayim (pw heaven): and whatsoever thou shalt
loose on
earth shall be loosed in shamayim (pw heaven).

There is no blasphemy in this either
since it is authority given by the Father to us through the mediator,
the Son of YHUH.

This is the same language Paul uses :

Rom 3:31 Do we then make VOID the
law through faith (steadfastness / moral conviction)? YHUH forbid: yea,
we ESTABLISH THE LAW.

In other words we make the law more
binding by doing it by emunah (pw faith) and thus justify and stand as
witnesses
for the coming inevitable judgment on those who do not repent and do
not keep the law.

If YHUH is King then his Son is Prince,
sharing the throne but not taking it over.

Test Every Spirit

The Marcion spirit makes two eloha (pw
gods) - an
evil god of the Everlasting Covenant (pw old testament), and a good god
of a so-called new testament. YHUH would
have to be the evil god for these To'rah (law)-haters and Jesus would
have to be
the good god who abolishes YHUH's so-called evil To'rah (law). The only
way to
do that is to make this Greek “Jesus” god and make the other Elohim (pw
God) (YHUH)
mere Jewish history. YHUH is not history since his Son came to
magnify HIStory of salvation starting with the everlasting covenant in
the Tanakh (erroneously called Old Testament). Let us test every spirit
- there is only one true
spirit of unity in the assembly of Yah'ushua with YHUH over
all, there is not a tri-unity.

A True Witness By Simon Peter
(Not a Jehovah's Witness, but a Yahudi-worshiper of Yahuah)

Mark 8: Whom do men say that I the Son of man am? 14 And
they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and
others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets. 15 He saith unto them, But
whom say ye that I am?

And
Simon Peter answered and said, as thou sayest thou art the I Am.

NO!!!
Peter does not say such a thing!

Peter
answers

"Thou
art the Messiah,

THE
SON OF

the living Elohim."

And Yah'ushua continues:

Barcuh'd (pw blessed) art thou, Simon
Bar Jonah: for
flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but MY FATHER which is
in shamayim (pw heaven).

ie. YHUH in shamayim has revealed his SON
on earth to Peter - it isNOT
YHUH on earth revealing himself as Yah'ushua in shamayim, or
YHUH on earth saying he is Yah'ushua on earth while being in
shamayim.

I pray that Yah'ushua will be
manifest to you correctly. How is Yah'ushua manifested in
the correct way to any believer?

In the same way He was revealed to
Peter as shown above. Yah'ushua says it's when those believers
accept his To'rah (law, commandments). Those who do not do his law and
commandments, they will have another kind of manifestation - that of
devils and man-made "church" system trinity theology,
turning Yah'ushua into a
blasphemous Godhead or HeadGod, some god who usurps YHUH and his law.

Here is the key to knowing the Son as
the Son of YHUH:

Jn
14:21
HE THAT HATH MY COMMANDMENTS, AND KEEPETH THEM, he it is that loveth
me:
and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him,
and will MANIFEST myself to him.

I pray for the true manifestation of
the Son of YHUH as you follow His commandments and love His Father who
gave us To'rah (Gen-Rev) by the splendour (pw glory) he
placed upon His people Israel, including the Jew (Yahudi), his
own
Son Yah'ushua.

Yah'ushua even knows who He
worships (serves, obeys) as a Jew - He has no identity crisis, He knows
The Shama as a YHUH-fearing Yahudi, he is not a pagan Samaritan like
Simon Magus who had no idea what even the spirit of YHUH was about.

Yah'ushua speaking to the
Samaritan woman

Jn 4:22 Ye worship ye know not what
(idols-false gods): we know WHO* we worship: for salvation is of the
Yahudim (hebrew for worshipper of Yahuah) (pagan translation
has the term "Jews" - misleading)

*[pagan influence in KJV chooses "what"
here instead of who - YHUH is not a “what” but a who, or else the sense
is that the woman worships a what (object-idol, or doctrine) rather
than the living
Eloha himself.]

YHUH is Spirit and must be worshipped
in truth, not as a man-god or a god-man or three-headed god, or
shape-shifting eggshell-albumen-yolk (Jesus-God-Spirit) or Elohim (pw
God) the
ventriloquist with a Jesus puppet on Catholic strings, or a God who
cannot decide if He is all-knowing or not, or a God who cannot add up
(1+1+1=1)?, or a God who cannot decide if he is omnipresent or squeezed
into the body of a man and into the restriction of time, or a God who
talks to himself, flaggelates himself, puts himself to death, punishes
himself, and raises himself up, forsakes himself, talks in riddles,
pats himself on the back, says he is the Father when he really means he
is the Son, says he is self-existent yet must be born. Says he consists
of everything yet must receive something, says he is greater all-in-all
yet subjects himself to himself, says he is to be worshipped but
worships himself. Really???

Let's be true - YHUH is not the Elohim
of confusion.

Jn 4:23 But the hour cometh, and now
is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in SPIRIT and in
truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. 24 YHUH IS Spirit:
and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

Yah'ushua worships His Father,
YHUH with us - He, Himself, is not YHUH.

Jn 15:1 I am the true vine, and my
Father is the husbandman (farmer)

..........and
we are the branches lets bear splendid fruit to the splendour of the
Father.

Conclusion

Whilst you have brought up many points
they have to be tested with the rest of scripture as I have tried to do.

Many attributes that Yah'ushua
has been GIVEN by authority FROM YHUH have been used to make the claim
that He is, in fact, YHUH himself, however, many of these attributes
have been promised to us as well, and that certainly is no argument for
us to claim we are YHUH, so why should the authority of pagans make
such a claim for Yah'ushua and turn him into an idol?

Instead it is evident that we, by the
power and chesed (pw grace) of Yahuah, can be
YHUH-like (falsely called godly), or in His image, or of His nature
(express image of his person (character), as Yah'ushua indeed
is.

11 Peter 3:11 Seeing then that all
these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be
in all morally and ceremonially pure conversation (pw holy) and
YHUH-LIKENESS (pw godliness),

11 Peter 1:6-7 6 And to knowledge
temperance; and to temperance patience; and to patience YHUH-LIKENESS;
7 And to YHUH-LIKENESS brotherly kindness; and to brotherly
kindness
love (pw charity)

11 Peter 1:3 According as his divine
power hath given unto us all things that pertain unto life and
YHUH-LIKENESS, through the knowledge of him that hath called us to
honour (pw glory) and virtue:

Titus 2:12 Teaching us that, denying
UN-YHUH-LIKENESS and worldly lusts, we should live soberly,
righteously, and YHUH-LIKE, in this present world;

Titus 1:1 Paul, a servant of YHUH,
and an apostle of Yah'ushua Messiah, according to the emunah
(pw faith) of
YHUH's elect, and the acknowledging of the truth which is after
YHUH-LIKENESS

1 Tim 2:2 For kings, and for all that
are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all
YHUH-LIKENESS and honesty. 3 For this is good and acceptable in the
sight of YHUH our Saviour.

Romans 11:26 And so all Israel shall
be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer,
and shall turn away UN-YHUH-LIKENESS from Jacob:

1 Tim 6: 3 If any man teach
otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our
Master Yah'ushua Messiah, and to the doctrine which is
according to YHUH-LIKENESS;

Many of these attributes
that Yah'ushua received from his Father are promised for us
too:

Purified
soul (1 Peter 1:22)

Perfected
love (1:Jn 4:12 Hebrews 10;14)

Man
- image
of YHUH (1 Cor 11:7)

body
made honourable (pw glorified) (Phi 3:21)

Son/s
of YHUH (Jn 1:12)

Born
of the Spirit (Jn 3:8)

Born
and begotten of YHUH (1 jn 5:18)

Filled
with the Spirit (Eph 5:18)

There are more but my
personal
favourite as a believer, and Son-OF-YHUH-to-be is:

Eph
3:19 "And to know the love of Messiah,

which
passeth knowledge, that ye might be filled with

ALL
THE FULNESS OF YHUH."

SO
ELOHIM (pw GOD ) MUST FULLY DWELL WITHIN YOUR BODY
AND SPIRIT

THAT
DOES NOT MAKE YOU = ELOHIM (pw GOD)

and
neither did it
make Yah'ushua = ELOHIM

Conclusion:

Yah'ushua
is not Elohim but he is perfectly

LIKE
him in character,

He is "homois" our forerunner of
what we shall be

1 Jn 3:2
Beloved, now are we the sons of Elohim (pw God),
and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but
we know that, when he shall appear,
we shall be like (homoios) him; for we shall see him as he is.

[*StrongsGreek*]
3664 homoios hom'-oy-os from the base of 3674;
similar
(in appearance or
character):--like, + manner. see
GREEK for 3674