Thursday, October 22, 2015

Caroline Baum says no as she gets to the heart of the political-economic problem with socialized health care. Countering Bernie Sanders recent statement, "When you look around the world, you see every other major country
providing health care to all people as a right, except the United
States," Baum explains,

"The problem with his statement is that rights aren't the government's to
give. John Locke, the 17th century English philosopher, wrote about
inalienable rights: God-given rights that can't be taken away."

A significant problem with declaring an economic good a right is that people immediately think it is the government's responsibility to either provide it for the masses or at least insure that it is provided. Because the good being declared a right is a scarce goods, other people will be forced to incur the costs of providing the good. Some will benefit while others will be harmed involuntarily.

The most obvious way the government could provide health care is for a fully socialized, single-payer government provided health care system--the kind that Bernie Sanders desires. Such a system would be a disaster. With the broken system we have now, the
number one purchaser of medical services already is the government. The primary
reason health care services are so expensive is that there is very
little profit and loss calculation undertaken by anyone because the
third-party-payer system drives a wedge between the demander of medical
services (the patient) and the supplier of the services (the doctor
and/or hospital). Sanders' proposal (and all single payers systems like
it) drives the wedge even deeper and farther.

Additionally, any claims
that, under a plan such as Sanders desires, we'll all be more healthy would be laughable if
the issue were not so serious. What Sanders' plan will do is increase
the demand for medical services, but it will not increase supply, so we
should expect the same sort of shortages they experience in Great
Britain's National Health Service. On the issue of government intervention in the health care industry, I highly recommend Colin
Gunn's film Wait Till Its Free.

We talked about the Christian ethic of private property and what that ethic implies for economic policy. We also talked about the economic benefits of a free market and why socialism always fails. You can access a podcast of the program by clicking here.

Tuesday, October 6, 2015

About socialism, says Andrea Rondón García, director of CEDICE’s Property Rights Committee, and academic
director of the Ludwig Von Mises Institute in Venezuela. She also teaches at the Andrés Bello Catholic University.

In a recent column, Garcia explains Venezuela's socialist disaster She cites Ludwig von Mises as she notes how socialism breeds economic regression, poverty, and political and civil repression as well:

Since 2003, the Venezuelan government has pushed central-economic planning as its fundamental policy: Chavistas
have imposed price and exchange controls, ignored property rights,
expropriated businesses, and destroyed the private sector’s productive
capacity.

When
economic liberties are compromised, political and civil liberties go
with them. The blatant threat against César Miguel Rondón demonstrates
how low the government has sunk in its attack on freedom of speech.