Written By Michael Reign on Thursday, July 6, 2017 | 9:34 PM

The terse written excerpt, as well as the 5 minute, 47
second cinematic presentation accompanying it, examines the plight of Samuel
Girod, an Amish farmer and resident of Bath County, Kentucky; who was formally
sentenced to serve six years in prison following what Eastern Kentucky District
Court Judge Danny C. Reeves deemed as an 'overt attempt by the defendant to
blatantly disregard USFDA ( United States Food and Drug Administration)
regulatory standards in the sale and marketing of various herbal supplements
for which he hadn't adhered to said agency's product labeling guidelines.'

LEXINGTON, Ky. (WKYT) – A federal judge sentenced a Bath
County Amish farmer to six years in prison on Friday morning.

A federal jury handed down guilty verdicts against Samuel
Girod in March for misbranding products.

After serving six years, Girod will have three years of
supervised release. He must also refrain from producing and manufacturing
products during that time. That judge said Girod exhibited continuous and
blatant disregard for the law.

At his trial in March of this year, the evidence established
that Girod had been manufacturing and selling homemade products to businesses
in numerous states and that the products did not comply with FDA regulations.
Specifically, one of his products was dangerous when used in the manner
recommended and all three were advertised in a way that did not comply with the
law.

In 2013, a federal judge in Missouri ordered Girod to stop
manufacturing and selling his products, until his labeling and advertisement of
the products met FDA regulations. Despite the court order, Girod continued to
manufacture these products and sell them in Indiana, Wisconsin and Illinois, marketing
them in the exact same manner as he had before the court order.

The evidence further established that, as part of the 2013
order, the judge required inspections of Girod’s facility in Bath County, to
ensure his compliance with the order. In November 2013, two FDA Consumer Safety
Officers attempted to conduct the court-ordered inspection of Girod’s facility,
but they were prevented from conducting the inspection by Girod and others on
his property. Then, after the criminal case against him began, Girod tampered
with a witness, failed to appear for court proceedings, and was a fugitive for
several months.

Girod
may file an appeal, but it’s not known if he intends to do so.

CRITICAL ANALYSIS:&nbspLet the harsh reality of Eastern Kentucky District
Court Judge Danny C. Reeves’s decision to impose a 6-year term of confinement,
a sentence which Samuel Girod will be required to serve no less than three
years, weigh heavily on your conscience. For we reside in a nation where the
rule of law is subject to the discretion of its political assemblies (Persons
that the corporate telecommunications industry insists have been duly elected
to represent the best interests of the civilian population), as well as their
judicial contemporaries, both of which routinely abandon their presupposed code
of ethics in favor of the most affluent segments of society, choosing instead
to visit a bevy of irredeemable vituperations upon the plebeian aggregate. The
reality of a two-tiered system of justice has never been more evident, when
members of the status quo can act with impunity, freely pillaging the public
trust while enriching their constituents within the financial sector at the
expense of the electorate, embroiling the nation in a limitless deluge of
military conflicts and combat operations for which no clear path to victory can
be reasonably expected, despoiling the institution of faith and sound religious
doctrine to mollify a burgeoning secularist consensus, engineer the dissolution of national sovereignty through the actualization of a series of international trade
agreements,

orchestrate the capital murder of individuals whose
crisis of conscience compelled them to sever their ties with deleterious elements
of the political establishment, etc., all of this without even the mention of
consequence. Federal prosecutors tasked with the responsibility of presenting
evidence of culpability on the part of defendant during the course of the
trial-based proceeding were rumored to have sought a 68-year term of
imprisonment coupled with a $3 million penalty of restitution, prior to Reeves's
ruling. Imagine for a moment the reaction of Girod's family at the prospect of
one of their own, an individual whose standing within the community is
unblemished, being given such a sentence, all the while murderers, rapists, and
narcotics traffickers throughout the whole of the continental United States are
typically required to serve less time.

Interested parties are invited to participate in the
following online petition:

Written By Michael Reign on Monday, April 24, 2017 | 10:04 PM

The following entry serves as a comprehensive listing of articles and information pertaining to eschatological discourse. {Updated on a Regular Basis}

Many are those who would seek to characterize the written verses and passages ascribed to Biblical Scripture as ancient fable, with still others dismissing the notion of theological discourse altogether. The fundamental tenets of Judeo-Christian philosophy oftentimes the target of secularist assemblies, multimedia organizations, the political establishment, the Entertainment Industry, religious abolitionists, etc., with the reality of end times prophecy viewed by the vast majority of the world’s population as hypothetical conjecture. For individuals whose faith, whose adherence to a monotheistic system of belief that rightfully exalts the Heavenly Father as the author of creation, remains steadfast, the concept of a Biblically-inspired predestination exists as a guide for future events.

Matthew Chapter 6, Verse 24 | “No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.”

DISCLAIMER: The views presented by those affiliated with the mainstream media, as well as its constituencies in the telecommunications industry, aren’t necessarily indicative of the principal author’s stance on any one particular topic of discussion. Whenever possible the author(s) of the specified material has/ have been credited in accordance with the ‘Fair Use Clause,’ as indicated in Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the United States Copyright Law.

17 U.S.C. § 107

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 17 U.S.C. § 106 and 17 U.S.C. § 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;

(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;

(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and

(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.