There is more chance of Roger Federer doping than Serena Williams

Because if Serena Williams was doping she would be winning virtually every tournament she entered like Roger Federer.

Reasons why Federer could be on steroids are:
!. Loss of Muscle mass in left arm
2.Getting Mono
3.Having twins earlier this year

The reason Serena Williams only focuses on Grand Slams is so she has more chance of winning them. Neither Federer or Serena are as good as they were a few years ago but if you both look at their winning percentages each year you will find something quite intresting.

So yeah, Serena could proabably "Federer" the women's circuit if she wanted to...but that would mean she was on Steroids...or Human Growth Horomone...or EPO...
Think about it. Roger Federer is so good they don't even call him Roger anymore.

"That's KING Federer to you, *****"

I want them to drug test him. Seriously. The ONLY thing he can't do is win on clay, and he still made the French Open final last year and won the first set against "Clay Czar" Rafael Nadal. If I were a pro-tennis player I might go ahead and take the next three years off to rest my body for his eventual decline. He's 4 Grand Slams from tying Pete Sampras' record of 14 Major Titles...At this rate, he'll be accomplishing that feat at the U.S. Open in 2008. And he'll be 27.

Yes clearly Fed is doping.how can such a big nose happen without the help of any roids?

Click to expand...

yes, exactly! put with the fact that he is quite skinny and is not built like a Djokovic or a Roddick (Nadal is quite athletic but he is quite clearly doping and anybody who does not think so is clearly deluding themselves.)

yes, exactly! put with the fact that he is quite skinny and is not built like a Djokovic or a Roddick (Nadal is quite athletic but he is quite clearly doping and anybody who does not think so is clearly deluding themselves.)

Click to expand...

yes!I mean..he's so skinny not strong and muscley like Djokovic or Simon or Davydenko.It is not possible to not take roids and be like that!
Plus you see how he cried when he lost the AO.that's cleary sign of mental instability that comes from steroid use.

Roger had twins so that is clear sign of steroid use.Noone could complete the career grand slam,break the record for most GS,get married and have twins all in the same year..without some kind of illegal help.Either he sold his soul to the devil,or used roids.Make your pick.

Roger had twins so that is clear sign of steroid use.Noone could complete the career grand slam,break the record for most GS,get married and have twins all in the same year..without some kind of illegal help.Either he sold his soul to the devil,or used roids.Make your pick.

yes, exactly! put with the fact that he is quite skinny and is not built like a Djokovic or a Roddick (Nadal is quite athletic but he is quite clearly doping and anybody who does not think so is clearly deluding themselves.)

Click to expand...

Oops, I didn't read this...OP is an idiot. END OF STORY. Yeah...if they're skinny they don't dope right? MORON.

So yeah, Serena could proabably "Federer" the women's circuit if she wanted to...but that would mean she was on Steroids...or Human Growth Horomone...or EPO...
Think about it. Roger Federer is so good they don't even call him Roger anymore.

"That's KING Federer to you, *****"

I want them to drug test him. Seriously. The ONLY thing he can't do is win on clay, and he still made the French Open final last year and won the first set against "Clay Czar" Rafael Nadal. If I were a pro-tennis player I might go ahead and take the next three years off to rest my body for his eventual decline. He's 4 Grand Slams from tying Pete Sampras' record of 14 Major Titles...At this rate, he'll be accomplishing that feat at the U.S. Open in 2008. And he'll be 27.

Click to expand...

Hello he has already past the Sampras Slam Record, and we are in year 2009 going to 2010. 2008 has already passed and I don't know why it says you posted today! Very weird or are you being sarcastic>?

Because if Serena Williams was doping she would be winning virtually every tournament she entered like Roger Federer.

Reasons why Federer could be on steroids are:
!. Loss of Muscle mass in left arm
2.Getting Mono
3.Having twins earlier this year

The reason Serena Williams only focuses on Grand Slams is so she has more chance of winning them. Neither Federer or Serena are as good as they were a few years ago but if you both look at their winning percentages each year you will find something quite intresting.

Click to expand...

Federer isnt winning hardly any events outside the slams so in the first sentence your post is already an epic fail. Federer has not lost muscle mass, he looks like he always did. So he takes steroids since he has twins? He isnt even the one who had the babies.

Serena and Federer both focus more on the slams these days. No difference there. I wouldnt go and say either Federer or Serena uses steroids, but of the two of them Serena is by far the more likely if either does.

yes, exactly! put with the fact that he is quite skinny and is not built like a Djokovic or a Roddick (Nadal is quite athletic but he is quite clearly doping and anybody who does not think so is clearly deluding themselves.)