Russia withdraws from ICC statute

THE HAGUE: Russia dealt the International Criminal Court (ICC) a new blow on Wednesday (Thursday in Manila) as the court’s top officials appealed to nations to support the tribunal hit by a wave of unprecedented defections.

Moscow has never ratified the world’s only permanent war crimes court, but in a heavily symbolic move on the opening day of the ICC’s annual meeting, it said it was formally withdrawing its signature to the tribunal’s founding Rome Statute.

“The court did not live up to the hopes associated with it and did not become truly independent,” Russia’s foreign ministry said, describing its work as “one-sided and inefficient.”

The move came only days after The Gambia on Monday formally notified the United Nations it was leaving the ICC, following in the footsteps of South Africa and Burundi.

“Don’t go,” pleaded Senegalese politician Sidiki Kaba, the president of the ICC’s Assembly of State Parties as he opened an eight-day meeting in The Hague. “In a world criss-crossed by violent extremism… it is urgent and necessary to defend the ideal of justice for all.”

The tribunal opened its doors in 2002 in The Hague as a court of last resort to try the world’s worst crimes where national courts are unable or unwilling to act.

But in his passionate plea, Kaba admitted the ICC was undergoing a “difficult moment.”

With Russia and China having blocked UN moves to refer war crimes in Syria to the ICC for investigation, Kaba acknowledged some saw “injustice” with international justice marked by “two weights, two measures.”

But he offered reassurances, saying: “You have been heard.”

There have long been accusations of bias against African nations. And Kenya, Namibia and Uganda have also indicated they are considering pulling out of the Rome Statute.

‘Law must not fall silent’
But chief prosecutor Fatou Bensouda told the assembly her office would continue “to forge ahead to deliver on its important mandate.” “We must not and will not allow that law falls silent during wars and conflicts.”

“Without the ICC we will regress into an even more turbulent world where chaos and violence take the upper hand,” she insisted.

On the eve of the meeting, Bensouda, who has already opened preliminary probes into cases in the Palestinian territories, Colombia and Ukraine, revealed she may be poised to launch her most complex investigation so far.

In her annual report she said there was a “reasonable basis” to believe US troops as well as the Taliban and Afghan forces may have committed war crimes in Afghanistan.

If a full-blown investigation goes ahead, the tribunal would be taking on its most politically controversial investigation to date.

And even though the United States has also not ratified the court, US forces will be exposed for the first time to an ICC investigation.