Archive for June, 2012

The US House of Representative voted yesterday, Thursday, June 29, 2012 to hold Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder in Contempt of Congress for his repeated refusal to provide Congress with the needed information about his and Obama’s involvement in the criminally stupid Fast and Furious debacle that murdered some 200 Mexican civilians and one unlucky US Border Patrol Agent, Brian Terry.

The vote was 255-67 with 17 Democrats putting partisanship aside and doing the right thing in charging Holder for defying the subpoena that he was served. That vote, however, did not happen until the grifters, shufflers, and thugs of the Congress Black Caucus walked outen mass.

This is simply because with these sorts it’s race first, last, and always and it’s only race. The scandal of Fast and Furious specifically centers on the murder of a White man, Brian Terry, through the actions of a Black POTUS and a Black Attorney General. That being the case, the CBC simply doesn’t care what crimes were committed by Holder and/or Obama. Frankly, Holder and Obama could have personally gunned down Brian Terry and then taken turns on his sisters and nieces and the vermin of the CBC would still claim that it was racist to investigate and/or prosecute them because, and only because, Holder and Obama are Black.

Be assured, if Terry had been Black and the Attorney General and POTUS White, these shiftless thugs would be hooting, hollering, an beating drums on the floor of the House, screaming and jabbering for those White’s to be strung up post haste.

These misborn bastard sons and daughters of the ghetto are just thugs in suits for whom it’s race first, last, and always and to whom no Black can commit a crime – except to not hold to each and every iota of their ill-thought racial solidarity.

Fortunately, this is an election year and they can be removed from the public sphere and sent back where they belong.

~*~

They will be responsible for letting a condition develop in this country which will create a climate that will bring seeds up out of the ground with vegetation on the end of them looking like something these people never dreamed of. In 2012, itís the ballot or the bullet.

Like this:

Fashion photographer Terry Richardson, who is as well known for his sexual perversions and predation as for his work, has put a new photo set of the Hollywood’s favorite train wreck, Lindsay Lohan.

Lindsay Lohan Is Such A Tease

Pull The Trigger!

Let’s be honest with ourselves, if not with each other; when most of us see these pictures our first thought is, “Pull the trigger!” We might feel guilty over it – I don’t – but we do wish that Lindsay Lohan would suicide to put us out of her misery.

Frankly, it’s sad but true that it seems that the only way society can be freed from the media’s obsession with inundating us with the excruciating details of the failures of these human wreckage is for them to die. Then we just have to suffer through a few weeks of eulogizing these failures and are then left in peace.

Like this:

[SinglePic not found]In the case the three “D’s” are the disabled, degenerate, and dependent – the three meta-categories of people that no sane member of any society wants to reproduce.

The question is whether or not it’s ethical to encourage them to get sterilized so as to avoid their propagating the vast host of problems such breedings cause society.

Barbara Harris, the founder of Project Prevention – formerly known as C.R.A.C.K. (Children Requiring A Caring Kommunity) – thinks so, specifically when it regards drug addicted women – and a few men. Her organization offer cash incentives for such people to undergo sterilization procedures.

Others think that Harris and Project Prevention are hellish in nature. They claim that she’s taking advantage of women who are not able to make an informed decision about their health. They’ve called what she’s doing bribery. They’ve claimed that she’s taking away these drug addicts’ right to reproduce. And – of course – they’ve brought out the old canard of racism.

The Question Remains

Personally, I find no ethical problems with offering anyone, especially the mentally disabled, the morally degenerate, and dependent, money if they’re willing to be voluntarily sterilized. I find it a far more efficient and moral choice than Planned Parenthood’s counseling these sorts to have abortions and any form of contraception that requires a regimen of intake is unlikely to be effective for these people.

Is it eugenics? Certainly, of a sort.† I see reason to be bothered by that.† Eugenics, when practiced on a voluntary basis, is no sin insofar as I can see. Killing unborn babies in order to save them from a nightmarish life is another story, as is ignoring their plight.