South Dakota Justifiable Homicide Bill Under Fire as Critics Say It Invites Murder of

This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the FAQ and RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate and remove the ads - it's free!

And with every post you continue to look more and more ridiculous and absurd. You and your ilk are complete lunatics who have seriously lost the plot. I don't give a rat's ass if I get gigged for this or not, but that is really all I can say about your nonsense.

Oh so it's that you're completely off-topic...and here I thought you were indulging a short tangent.

Oh, so you're talking out your ass and are now back peddling. .

No Jerry, my comment was in reference to statements such as these:

Originally Posted by jamesrage

People who murder abortion providers or bomb abortion clinics do so to prevent those people from performing more abortions or to try to prevent that place from performing more abortions.

Note not "To keep them from aborting my child" but simply to prevent them from performing them in a general sense. Advocating bombing abortion clinics simply to "prevent" abortions in a general sense and acting as if somehow this is significantly different then the justifications people have for terrorist actions.

By the way, I may be crazy or perhaps "irrational", but I'm going to go out on a limb and say that piece of legislation is longer than 2 sentences long and thus its possible to have issues with it beyond a simple 2 sentence synopsis. Maybe that's all IRRATIONAL of me to believe.