{¶1}
Appellant-attorney Catherine Brady ("Brady"),
former executor of the estate of Sarunas V. Abraitis
("Abraitis"), appeals the trial court's
decision to remove her as executor. Finding no merit to the
appeal, we affirm.

{¶2}
In 2008, Abraitis's mother, Vlada Abraitis, died.
Abraitis was appointed executor of her estate in 2011. Brady
was his attorney at the time. In 2013, the probate court
removed Abraitis from his position as executor, finding that
he had concealed assets of her estate. He was ordered to
repay $575, 870.30 to his mother's estate.

{¶3}
The court named appellee-attorney Adam Fried
("Fried") as the successor executor on Vlada's
estate. The court also found that Brady engaged in frivolous
conduct with respect to the administration of the estate. The
court ordered Brady and Abraitis to pay attorney fees and
expenses to Fried in the amount of $104, 485 in attorney fees
and $1, 214.59 in expenses. Brady appealed, but this court
affirmed the probate court's decision. In re Estate
of Abraitis, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 104816,
2017-Ohio-5577, discretionary appeal not allowed,
Slip Opinion No. 2017-1131, 2017-Ohio-9111.

{¶4}
Abraitis died on January 4, 2017. In accordance with his
will, Brady was appointed executor of his estate. Fried, as
fiduciary of Vlada's estate, filed a claim against
Abraitis's estate, but Brady rejected the claim. Fried
then moved to remove Brady as executor of the estate. The
trial court held a hearing, granted the motion removing Brady
as executor, and appointed appellee-attorney Egidijus
Marcinkevicius as successor fiduciary to Abraitis's
estate.

{¶5}
In its decision removing Brady as the executor, the trial
court found the following: (1) during the hearing, Brady was
"evasive, argumentative and largely unaware of what her
responsibilities were" as executor of the estate; (2)
Brady admitted to receiving a large amount of cash from
Abraitis shortly before his death, which she had failed to
account for or list as an estate asset; and (3) Brady
testified she knew Abraitis used a false social security
number on at least one bank account belonging to the estate.

{¶6}
The court further found that Brady had a "clear conflict
in serving as executrix of this estate due to the judgment
rendered between her and decedent, jointly and severally,
" and "Brady's rejection of Adam Fried's
claim on behalf of the estate of Abraitis's mother is
further indication of conflict and falls within the allowance
under R.C. 2113.18."

{¶7}
Brady now appeals, raising the following assignments of error
for our review:

I. The probate court erred as a matter of law where the
movant for removal, Adam Fried, Successor Fiduciary of the
Estate of Vlada Abraitis, lacked standing to ...

Our website includes the first part of the main text of the court's opinion.
To read the entire case, you must purchase the decision for download. With purchase,
you also receive any available docket numbers, case citations or footnotes, dissents
and concurrences that accompany the decision.
Docket numbers and/or citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a
legal proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision. If the document contains a simple affirmation or denial without discussion,
there may not be additional text.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.