Thursday, May 30, 2013

A couple of days ago I posted about my fulfilled prediction when Ecuador's first satellite had the misfortune to orbit through some old Russian rocket space junk, significantly damaging the Ecuadorian microsat.

Now someone has made the bold suggestion that one way to deal with the problem is to hold the countries responsible for the junk that did the damage responsible for the damages.

I tend to think that this might not work, but I'm guessing that this incident will raise awareness among the powers that orbit satellites that space junk is becoming an increasingly worrisome, and potentially very expensive, problem.

Here's a picture of the satellite, with some people in the picture to show how big it wasn't. But it was still Ecuador's first working satellite in space.

Used to be that we didn't think we could have babies conceived in test tubes or cloned domestic livestock, like sheep and cows. Now that's pretty much routine.

So with the discovery of a mammoth apparently with some of its ancient blood still liquid (though I will want to read the peer-reviewed description of that), I think that if it pans out, the inevitability of cloning a mammoth is one step closer.

After all, a female elephant could carry a cloned mammoth fetus to term, so it isn't like they'd have to make an artificial mammoth uterus.

I'm going to make a general prediction here and say that we'll have a living, walking cloned mammoth within 10 years, a lot sooner than men will get to Mars.

One of the climate warming talking points favored by skeptics is that the globe in total hasn't warmed much over the past 15 years or so. They manage to get to that conclusion by taking the high temp in 1998 and the low temps of recent La Nina years and drawing a line between them. Stupid, I know and I hope you do too, gentle reader, but that's what they do, ignoring the decadal warmth of the ought decade a couple of years back, which was far warmer than any other decade we've seen since systematic temperature records began to be collected.

But forgetting about that, one of the predictions of standard accepted influence of greenhouse gases on the temperature of the Earth is that the Arctic will get warmer faster than elsewhere on the globe. And this recent picture from the NASA Earth Observatory site shows that's exactamente what is happen-amente.

Urbana, Illinois, was named after Urbana, Ohio, which was named after Urbanna, Virginia. Urbanus means city dweller and was the name of eight Popes. But: Urbanna, Virginia means "City of Anne" and was named after Queen Anne of England.

(This question occurred to me because I noticed Maryland has a town named Urbana.)

And there's one in Venezuela. I imagine that had something to do with honoring a Pope.

Monday, May 27, 2013

Elite athletes are not like most of us. The best of them have a certain drive that allows them to train harder, faster, and longer than the average. But many people can train hard. Elite athletes are also born with physical attributes that make them different than average people. Bigger lung capacity, unusually proportioned limbs, better eyesight or hand-eye coordination.

Elite swimmers have many of these attributes (maybe not the eyesight), but one thing that many of them also have in common is joint flexibility. Joint flexibility allows better leverage and better grip on the water, longer strokes, and stronger kicks. In particular, hyperextendable knees allow more depth on the kicks for all but the breaststroke - elite breaststrokers have other physical advantage.

The linked Daily Mail article has several pictures of Olympic medalist and world record holder Ryan Lochte. He's obviously strong and tall and developed (though a little post-Olympic soft). But in the first picture, notice how hyperextended his knee is. That's a physical trait he was born with, which gives him a stronger kick. Next time you watch a world-class swim meet (if you do), notice how many of the competitors also have hyperextendable knees. It's something you can't win without.

The Daily Mail article that's linked there made some catty remarks about her derriere being less than perfectly toned. Of course, their standard for toned is pretty high, considering how many pictures of Victoria's Secret models they feature. So I have no problem with Jennifer's posterior and wouldn't mind seeing more of it.

Jennifer also posed ostensibly nude in Allure magazine. More on that later (soon).

The annual Met Gala Ball lets fashion designers go a little crazy. And they went crazier than normal this year with some kind of punk-couture theme. So there weren't a lot of va-va-voom outfits on the red carpet this year. So rather than try to pick the best-dressed and the worst-dressed, which was done many other Web places, I just picked who I thought looked good. So here they are:

Blake Lively: This might have been the best dress of the night, and it doesn't hurt to be worn on her superstructure.

It took my brain a couple of minutes to process the visual input and come up with a name -- Lindsay Wagner, Playboy Playmate, November 2007.

Now, this led to a bit of research, and I discovered a) that she's on Twitter, b) that she's married to relatively wealthy guy, and c) she has two kids, one pretty recently. This via some of the pictures she posted. (Oh yeah, she's still VERY cute).

The relatively wealthy guy plays hockey, but I don't think he's a pro hockey player. This, however, is not clear.

One thing about this Lindsay Wagner - it has always been a slight challenge to find pictures of her, because of that OTHER Lindsay Wagner, the fine actress known best for being The Bionic Woman (even though her body of work showed that she was more than just an android).

If you follow the type of news I like to follow (occasionally), then you will have found what I found already. If not, and if you follow this blog (not very many people do, so consider yourself very fortunate), I am linking below to pictures of the slight wardrobe accident that befell Miranda Kerr last week.

Now here be the thing; I've seen them before. Many, many other people have too. She's gone topless before, both informally and formally. She's posed nude for glamor, and she's posed nude on the beach. I probably have even written posts about this type of thing before, so if you search 'Miranda Kerr' in the search box, you might find some more.

So is this a big deal? Well, the way Miranda handled it, not so much. She seemed amused. So in essence if you're used to being valued for your beauty in your line of work, and you know that you've already displayed it all before, it isn't a big deal for you (and many of these swimsuit models will admit that there is no body privacy on a shoot, anyway).

But the thing is; they're really nice. And the thing about Miranda is, she's a dazzling combo of the cute and the beautiful and the sweet and the slinky. She has a confidence in how she looks, who she is, and what she's got (which includes a cute tot and a handsome actor hubby). So therefore giving the fans another glimpse of part of what makes her special is just another day on the job.

Well, maybe not just another day. But, well -- how do you like THEM apples?

Let's face it, it's ridiculous. And Democrats are partly to blame, because they played games blocking nominees by Republican presidents when they shouldn't have. But the Republicans in this Senate have pushed the nomination delays to a whole new bad level of bad, and it appears with increasing probability that we're going to have a nuclear showdown over filibusters.

While it's sad that grown men who should know better are behaving this way, it appears necessary for the proper governance of the country to rein in the out-of-control, abused filibuster power.

10. A major satellite collision in space emphasizes the space debris problem.
-- The odds of this keep increasing every year!

Well, if you consider the first-ever satellite belonging to the country of Ecuador 'major' (the Ecuadorians probably do), then this is a totally came-true prediction. Even if it's only a little nanosatellite, it was working, it was in orbit, and now it's in big trouble after hitting stuff in space.

“We are in the midst of dramatic assault on the security of the food
supply,” said Dr. Robert S. Lawrence, director of the Center for a
Livable Future, part of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public
Health. The group promotes ecological research into the nexus of diet,
food production, environment and human health.

The primary
culprit of all this menu mayhem is climate change, which is choking off
certain crops already weakened by both genetic tinkering and chemically
based farming, some experts contend."

One of the problems highlighted in the article is that warmer weather allows more plant pathogens to attack crops - a serious problem for coffee, for one thing.

Not only is Shakira blonde Latina gorgeous and she has dance moves that are marvelous seductive, it turns out that she is very, very, very flexible - circus contortionist level flexible. She recently demonstrated this talent.

About time I wrote another sonnet. This one came out about the way I wanted it to. You never can tell if a sonnet will end up where you think it's going to go at the beginning.

'As If You Were'

How many times have I encountered youin thought? Uncountable - you do possessmy mind at unexpected moments, throughthe minutes of all days. As I progresseach mundane section that assembles life,
unbidden yet expectedly I findmyself with you, as if you were my wifeand we together celebrated bind-ing love with physical emotions, deepwithin each other's souls as bodies rolledand mold and force and surge, before they leap
into the flames of ecstasy. I holdthose images until they fade, untilanother comes and I am with you still.

Talk of Rafael Nadal's demise was apparently a bit premature, as he beat Federer on clay again. And Serena Williams is on a serious roll, having won four tournaments in a row with this waxing of Azarenka.

Sunday, May 19, 2013

I haven't posted a picture of the extraordinary Cheryl Cole for awhile, and it's been even longer since I updated her relationship status. (She's in one, and it's working, it appears - more on that soon).

She's also a face of L'Oreal cosmetics, and as a perk of that she gets to show up at the Cannes Film Festival and model gorgeous gowns.

And with Cheryl, it's the smile that makes her more than just a pretty face and great body. The smile makes her both radiant and girly, at the same time. (The dimples, of course).

Turns out that she and another gorgeous girl, Eva Longoria, with whom Cheryl shares a history of being married to a professional athlete who did not comprehend his outrageous fortune, met up at Cannes and showed that putting beauty together is multiplicative, not additive.

The LA Kings won the Cup last year for the first time, not having won it before in their entire 44 years of existence, with their other appearance the infamous serious famous for the curve in Marty McSorley's blade and the godlike goaltending of Patrick Roy. Oh yeah, they also had Wayne Gretzky that year.

Toronto Maple Leafs, last Cup in 1967, finally made the playoffs again this year. (46 years)

St. Louis Blues, 44 years, haven't been to the finals since 1970.

Vancouver Canucks, 41 years, 3 Stanley Cup finals.

Buffalo Sabres, 41 years, two finals, and a few more conference finals.

Washington Capitals, 37 years, 1 Stanley Cup final.

Philadelphia Flyers, 37 years, but they've won a couple, and been in few more recent finals.

Phoenix Coyotes/Winnipeg Jets, 33 years. No finals, but made it to the Western Conference final last year.

The New York Islanders, 29 years; but yeah, there were four Stanley Cups before that.

So the Caps aren't the worst it can be, yet, but part of the recent problem is that they've been ousted early with Ovie and the Young Guns. There are a lot of reasons why, and clearly hockey IS fickle, and no one ever guaranteed that every team has to win a championship. Yet I think the Caps deserve a change of luck next year, but with the new NHL alignment, they might not even make the playoffs next year. The repercussions of such a failure like that will be fairly large, I would think.

"Each year we looked at temperature and precipitation variations and
the amount of water contained within the snowpack as of April," said
USGS scientist Greg Pederson, the lead author of the study. "Snow
deficits were consistent throughout the Rockies due to the lack of
precipitation during the cool seasons during the 1930s – coinciding with
the Dust Bowl era. From 1980 on, warmer spring temperatures melted
snowpack throughout the Rockies early, regardless of winter
precipitation. The model in turn shows temperature as the major driving
factor in snowpack declines over the past thirty years."

Runoff from Rocky Mountain winter snowpack accounts for 60 to 80
percent of the annual water supply for more than 70 million people
living in the western U.S., and is influenced by factors such as the
snowpack’s water content, known as snow water equivalent, and the timing
of snowmelt."

Eventually, water supply is going to be more important, and probably cause far more difficulties (as well as deaths), but right now, the world's most critical agricultural crisis is ...

Honeybees. (Kudos to you if you've been paying attention and already know this.)

As it stands, I think that it would make some sense to store away some almonds in anticipation of the imminent almond shortage. That would sound kind of funny if I didn't believe I wasn't kidding. Hazelnuts and cashews and walnuts, too. And there are some fruits that it might pay to save: blueberries, strawberries, watermelon, tangerines, tangelos, oranges, apples, avocados, pears, raspberries... are you starting to get worried yet?

"The latest data,
from the 2012-2013 winter, indicate an average loss of 45.1 percent of
hives across all U.S. beekeepers, up 78.2 percent from the previous
winter, and a total loss of 31.1 percent of commercial hives, on par
with the last six years. (Most keepers now consider a 15 percent loss
"acceptable.")"

Mr. Dahle said he had planned to bring 13,000 beehives from Montana — 31
tractor-trailers full — to work the California almond groves. But by
the start of pollination last month, only 3,000 healthy hives remained.

.......

Almonds are a bellwether. Eighty percent of the nation’s almonds grow
here, and 80 percent of those are exported, a multibillion-dollar crop
crucial to California agriculture. Pollinating up to 800,000 acres, with
at least two hives per acre, takes as many as two-thirds of all
commercial hives.

This past winter’s die-off sent growers scrambling for enough hives to
guarantee a harvest. Chris Moore, a beekeeper in Kountze, Tex., said he
had planned to skip the groves after sickness killed 40 percent of his
bees and left survivors weakened.

“But California was short, and I got a call in the middle of February
that they were desperate for just about anything,” he said. So he sent
two truckloads of hives that he normally would not have put to work.

In this, the authors make the case that direct deaths caused by nuclear energy are far less than those caused by fossil fuel burning.

I am certain that this paper will be critiqued, criticized, examined, and revisited. But it says some things that are self-evidently true, such as:

"Likewise, we calculated that nuclear power prevented an average of 64 gigatonnes of CO2-equivalent (GtCO2-eq)
net GHG emissions globally between 1971-2009 (see Fig. 3). This is
about 15 times more emissions than it caused. It is equivalent to the
past 35 years of CO2 emissions from coal burning in the U.S.
or 17 years in China (ref. 3) — i.e., historical nuclear energy
production has prevented the building of hundreds of large coal-fired
power plants." (emphasis added - and coal-fired power plants cause direct health problems, regardless of the climate effects)

And for those impressed with the rise of fracking and the concomitant rise of U.S. natural gas production, there's this eye-opener:

"Our findings also have important implications for large-scale "fuel
switching" to natural gas from coal or from nuclear. Although natural
gas burning emits less fatal pollutants and GHGs than coal burning, it
is far deadlier than nuclear power, causing about 40 times more deaths
per unit electric energy produced (ref. 2)."

Wowsers.

Since the co-author of this piece is climate skeptic target James Hansen, it's not surprising that it comes down hard on GHG-emitting power plants. But what's surprising to me is the way that they approach it - not in terms of economic cost, but in terms of human cost. The alternative is that "underpowered" Third World countries could do better health-wise with more robust economies built on increased energy production. Since they may be spiting themselves with fossil fuel energy production, the alternatives are primarily solar and nuclear -- and until we get a lot of big flow batteries online, nuclear is the only proven alternative.

My first comment:
"I follow tennis quite a bit. In singles tennis, you can see a
player's mental state pretty readily. There have been numerous
hard-fought five set (mens) matches, or three set women's matches, that
were battles through the first 4 (2) sets, and which then turned into
laughers, like 6-0 or 6-1, in the final set. Because in a hard-fought
battle, every thing is razor sharp. Every point counts. The stress level
is incredibly high when so much is riding on each swing of the racket.

But then... something goes wrong for one of the players. A call
they thought was surely out was barely in. A fan yellls in the stands at
the wrong time, disrupting a serve that turns into a double fault. They
mishit an easy volley. SUDDENLY, in the player's mental state,
everything is against them. Shots that were an inch in now fall an inch
out. First serve lasers now are just long. They can't make that last
step to make a return. And against them is an opponent that senses the
desperation, the weakness, the errors creeping into the game, and their
confidence soars. They blast away, and the opponent's weak resolve
collapses. Match over.

Over and over in this series [Capitals vs. Rangers] we heard "hold serve" for the home
wins. But we also heard "clinch in 6" when the Caps went back to NY.
Yeah, even from Barry Melrose [ESPN hockey commentator]. They had the big MO, the confidence. Does
anyone forget the nail-biting game 5 win? [Overtime win] Wasn't that mental toughness?
However it happened, the refereeing in game 6 affected the outcome.
The obvious interference on Perreault - not called (even he asked
"Where's the penalty?"). The slew foot on Green. As one writer put it,
were the Rangers such gentlemen? And the Caps lost a very close one,
1-0, creating an edgy mentality for Game 7. And when things started to
go wrong in Game 7 (including an almost "I'm going to be a hero" moment
for Wilson), it snowballed. They collapsed. Mental edge - pfft.

Bos, remember the Cubbies? The Bartman ball? What happened after that?

My second comment:
Having
said all that, what can be done differently? When does bad karma
reverse itself? You never can know. The Red Sox [pro baseball team], famously, tantalized
their fans with occasional World Series appearances - which they
famously, heartbreakingly lost. They kept trying to build a team with
skills and mental toughness not to give up. When you have that,
sometimes luck finally lends a hand. Like Mariano Rivera walking Kevin
Millar, 9th inning, Game 4, down 3-0. Like Dave Roberts making a steal,
just barely beating a tag from an incredible Jose Posada throw. Winning
that game, just introducing enough doubt into NYY [New York Yankees] that suddenly a team
that always lost couldn't lose. And finally, after decades of infamous
frustration, didn't.

Certainly, personnel-wise, Caps have a lot to think about. Cap
space, age, prospects (or lack of them), injuries - all of these will
figure into what they do going forward. There are no easy answers. I
personally think that the main thing they really lacked this year was a
true reliable second scoring threat. At times in the season I thought
Brouwer was that (pardon me, where was HE in the playoffs? - I thought
he filled the big body tough guy in front of the net role). We never
will know what a healthy Erat might have contributed, but the second
line of Ribeiro-Brouwer-Fehr didn't seem to be much of a factor.

After their horrid start, this team could have packed it in and
gone home early. They steadied and got some puck luck to get into the
playoffs, and whatever is said about why, PK-ed a lot of minutes in the
playoffs to get it to a game 7. There was one factor that was true the
whole season; when they had a lot of PKs early, the offense rarely got
on track during the game. I saw that happening against an effective
Rangers shot-blocking D.

Final thought: did Rangers crash the net and play tough around the
net to win game 6? As I recall, it was a fortunate shot from the point
that fell in that made the difference.

No magic for the Caps. [I'll write a bit more about magic and the Stanley Cup later this month.]

"The Hill reported on Monday that some Senate Democrats are considering changes to the filibuster to prevent Republicans from blocking nominations by requiring nominees meet a 60-vote threshold, rather than just a simple majority.

Reid is reportedly mulling the option and Mikulski said she would back him if he did — even if the mid-session change leaves Democrats open to the criticism that they’re changing the rules in the middle of the game."

"The New York Times yesterday highlighted two of the more recent ways that Republicans have manipulated loopholes in Senate rules
to delay confirmation of Secretary of Labor nominee Thomas Perez and
Environmental Protection Agency nominee Gina McCarthy. It’s worth
stepping back and realizing: what’s happening here is that Republicans
are delaying these nominations beyond their eventual insistence
that almost all nominees must get 60 votes. In other words, they’re
filibustering on top of their own filibusters.

That’s just two examples. There are numerous others; again, with
virtually all nominees required to have 60 votes, one can accurately say
that Republicans are filibustering every nomination. But perhaps the worst are the “nullification” filibusters,
in which Republicans simply refuse to approve any nominee at all for
some positions — the National Labor Relations Board, the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau — because they don’t want those agencies to
carry out their statutory obligations.

In doing so, Republicans are not breaking the rules of the Senate.
They are, however, breaking the Senate itself, and harming the
government."

Back on the 9th (two posts back) I wrote about hopes that the Chesapeake Bay oyster population could be somewhat restored, which would help in general to clean up the bay and improve the ecosystem overall. Well, Tom Toles of the Washington Post agreed with that.

I downloaded this cartoon but in the interests of copyright, I'm going to link to it. To see it you'll have to sit through a short advertisement. Sorry about that.

Note added May 17: the link now goes to the whole gallery for the month of May. So click through to get to the cartoon for May 10.

Thursday, May 9, 2013

Paricutin is the cinder cone volcano that popped up in a farmer's field in Mexico - poor farmer Dionisio Pulido will forever be remembered as the unlucky guy farming those particularly unfortunately located acres. The volcano was named for the little tiny town that it obliterated, and the lava flows from the volcano also took out a slightly bigger burg, where the church steeple can still be seen emerging from the lava flow. See below for a small picture of that with the still-active volcano on the horizon.

So it occurred to me that I had never seen what the volcano looked like from space (though I think I did see a picture of the larger volcanic field that Paricutin is part of). So I simply took a look with Google Maps. Because it's still black and fresh, the new volcanic cone and surrounding lava flows do stand out. It's easy to see many other older cones in the picture. Because I active loaded it from Google Maps, you can slide it around, zoom in, or zoom out on it. Have fun.

Oysters. If large areas of the Chesapeake Bay could bring back viable oyster reefs, then the water quality of the Bay would improve markedly. Nutrient levels would go down. Phytoplankton levels would go down. Anoxia would go down, because less phytoplankton would be dying and sinking to the bottom to get decomposed, using up oxygen. Water clarity would increase. Seagrass areas would increase because of the increased water clarity. Fish would be healthier, because there'd be less bad water and toxic algae and bacteria would all get filtered by the industrious oysters.

But the problem is: disease. Can they come back fast enough, and not harvested so much, to defeat the diseases that nearly wiped them out?

Oyster disease: Dermo
"Dermo is caused by a parasite that thrives in
above-average water temperatures* and during droughts*. It inhibits growth
and reproduction, and causes death in heavily infected oysters."

"The youth vote has made its presence
felt before. In the past two presidential elections, it was the youth
vote that tipped the scale and decided the outcome of the race. We
turned out in unprecedented numbers, in large part based on Obama's
promises to take meaningful climate action. For many youth, and millions
of other Americans, our vote is also a climate vote -- a vote for a
livable future. We will be using our votes, our voices, to defend that
future with a renewed urgency -- as we showed in last week's primary."

"The climate movement is a growing political force, and you can
expect us to be a permanent and powerful part of the political
landscape. We'll work to shape it until it reflects the America we need
to see. As climate change takes an increasing toll on our economy and
way of life, we will see more and more people taking a stand on the
issues that matter most to America's future.

You'll be seeing us in electoral politics, mobilizing votes and
going on the offensive. You'll see us at the polls too. We'll be the
ones voting for our future. We hope you join us."

Although apparently Rush is disputing it, the facts don't support him (as is often the case with much of the Limbag's assertions) -- he and stations he's on are losing advertisers and thus the stations are losing money by airing him. The apparent abandonment of Rush might be a bellwether indicating a shift in the general public opinion, pointing to an increasing marginalization of the far right, partly based on the increasing obviousness that a great many of them possess nary a clue related to reality.

They still have way too much influence in Congress; we can only hope that the loss of Limbaugh advertisers and a couple more missteps in Congress, perhaps combined with a collapse of the right-wing heaven in Kansas and increasing sequestration woes, will lead to a growing and influential recognition that the positions and politics of the intransigent and ignorant far-right are becoming less important. It will take awhile for this to shake out, but there is definitely some shaking going on.

Monday, May 6, 2013

I didn't either, but we are. It could actually happen 'soon', 'soon' being very relative when talking about the world's slowest scientific experiment.

But this new Web site about it has something I hadn't seen before, a time-lapse video of a year's worth of drop evolution, showing that the drop is actually getting bigger. And thus it could drop 'soon'.

Here's the recent article update about the world's most boring experiment. I don't think that's fair if you're into material properties -- the world record holder for slowest-flowing liquid is kind of interesting in that respect. Even if it is slower than molasses in January by a good stretch.

Saturn has a lot of strange moons, leading off with Titan and following up with Iapetus. And the little moons are weird too, including the shepherd moon that leaves a gravity wake in the rings, in case you didn't believe in gravity.

Today's subject is Epimetheus, which shares an orbit with another moon, Janus, and was thought to be Janus for awhile until observers figured out exactly that, which is that Epimetheus shares an orbit with Janus. If you want to know how that works, look it up (or go here).

Meanwhile, Epimetheus is also one of those astronomical bodies so small that it doesn't have enough gravity to mold itself into a spheroid, so it kinda looks like a wedge.

CAPTION: The plains that surround the Caloris basin are
geologically complex. Today's featured images highlights some of the
kilometer-scale knobs that surround much of the basin, which are thought
to be blocks of material ejected by the Caloris basin-forming event.
This area, a region within Tir Planitia, has also been subjected to
compressional stresses, which resulted in the formation of scarps that
cut across the scene. Unraveling the complex sequence of events in this
region, which includes deposition of ejecta, possible volcanic
resurfacing, and tectonic deformation, will be aided by the
high-resolution targeted images to be collected in MESSENGER's second
extended mission.

Lionfish are still a really big problem for the Caribbean reefs. As I've noted, even though it's hard to have an impact on 'em, throwing out catch limits and letting divers spear and eat all they can is a good idea.

So here's another Web site advocating eating lionfish (you do have to be careful not to get nicked with the poisonous spines) "

Republicans can't get their own House in order, according to an article from Politico. They are so riven in terms of their ideology and their motivations, they can't decide if making sure rape victims can't get abortions is more important that making sure kids born to mothers in poverty can't go to preschool.

Such a dilemma.

This has been building, and coming, for a long time; but the problem is now that these internal divisions are threatening the ability of the United States to ACTUALLY FUNCTION AS A SOVEREIGN NATION. I.e., it's not just about politics, it's about government and governing and ACTUALLY DOING WHAT'S RIGHT FOR THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE HERE.

Sorry for the shouting. But it's ripely clear that these guys have no idea how to fix the mess that they're in, which is creating a bigger mess for all of us to deal with. So in the meantime, messes like climate change and the sequester and disaster relief and gun control don't get dealt with.

No wonder the approval rating of Congress is 17%. Or 12%. Doesn't really matter, it's obvious that Republicans suck at governing and most Americans are sick of their sucking. Like I am.

" Speaker John Boehner, Cantor and McCarthy are plagued by a conference
split into two groups. In one camp are stiff ideologues who didn’t
extract any lesson from Mitt Romney’s loss and are only looking to slash
spending and defund President Barack Obama’s health care law at every
turn. In the other are lawmakers who are aligned with Cantor, who is
almost singularly driving an agenda which is zeroed in on family issues."

and also

" House Republicans have had worse days — they had to abandon a tax
plan pushed by Boehner in December, which was followed by a gaggle of
rank-and-file members trying to prevent Boehner from serving a second
term as speaker.

But the continued internal struggles illustrate a miniature picture
of chaos. Despite all of House Republicans’ efforts to plot, plan and
strategize to shift a divided Washington in their favor, hurdles have
been difficult to avoid."

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

You may or not have heard that NASA's Next Big Thing will be an asteroid capture mission. They are planning on capturing an asteroid and dragging it back in the Earth zone and putting it into orbit around the Moon so that it can be studied, as explained here in an illustrated article.

Below is a picture of the capture phase of the mission. I can't tell how big the conceived asteroid being captured is supposed to be, but it doesn't look a lot bigger than 20 meters in diameter. I think they should seriously consider catching 2013 GM3. (Maybe this would be a good test of that space debris capure technology the world will be working on. Yeah, right.)

I just posted about the Fermi telescope's near collision last year. And just last week, there was the biggest ever European conference on space debris. And here's one of the things they concluded:

"There is a wide and strong expert consensus on the pressing need to
act now to begin debris removal activities," says Heiner Klinkrad, Head
of ESA's Space Debris Office.

"Our understanding of the growing space debris problem can be compared
with our understanding of the need to address Earth's changing climate
some 20 years ago."

There was wide agreement that the continuing growth in space debris
poses an increasing threat to economically and scientifically vital
orbital regions.

Now, if 20 years ago there was an understanding of the need to address Earth's changing climate, and nothing of major significance, import, or impact has been done since, then clearly the next 20 years probably will result in very little progress on the space debris problem, as the problem gets progressively worse.

Great. However, there's a big difference between this and climate change: the deleterious economic and scientific consequences of a markedly increased frequency of space accidents that disable expensive satellites are immediately perceivable. For that reason, action might start to get taken. They are already emphasizing that all new satellites will need deorbit capability, and they also said this:

"... current levels mean that we must soon begin removing debris from orbit,
with research and development urgently needed for pilot 'cleaning'
missions."

I'm going to be REAL interested in the pilot technologies that ultimately get launched to make the attempt to clean up orbiting space junk.

But I read yesterday that the NASA Fermi telescope nearly got hit last year by a Russian satellite -- they had to perform an evasive maneuver with thrusters not intended to be used for that purpose to avoid it.

"Twice before, the Fermi team had been alerted to potential conjunctions,
and on both occasions the threats evaporated. It was possible the
Cosmos 1805 [defunct Russki Cold War satellite] encounter would vanish as well, and the spacecraft's
observations could continue without interruption.

But the update on Friday, March 30, indicated otherwise. The satellites
would occupy the same point in space within 30 milliseconds of each
other."

So this event shows two things: one, it is crowded up there, and two, the actual chances of a collision are reduced by tracking of satellites and debris and maneuvering when necessary to avoid a hit.

But there are still seven more months in 2013, and like I said, it's crowded up there. I don't want it to happen, but one can't deny that it's possible, with increasing chances of such an event every day.

One of the wonders of the Internet is that you can conceive a question that previously would have taken a trip to the library and several encyclopedias to answer (if it was answerable at all), and get the answer in a couple of minutes.

I could then commence searching, and very quickly ascertain the following answer:

"Nestled amid the fat cells and glandular tissue [of the breast] are the milk ducts,
an intricate network of channels. Pregnancy hormones cause the milk
ducts to grow in number and size.

The ducts branch off into
smaller channels near the chest wall called ductules. At the end of each
ductule is a cluster of small, grapelike sacs called alveoli. A cluster
of alveoli is called a lobule; a cluster of lobules is called a lobe.
Each breast contains between 15 and 20 lobes, with one milk duct for
every lobe."

So there's the answer to the question. And I even found a diagram (below). So now you know what I know now.