Today, Tuesday, September 26th from 7
to 9pm EST on American Political Radio, RIGHT
SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss the
Iranian nuclear deal...could it soon be gone, President Trump's historic
U.N. speech, and important news of
the day.

Op-ed: A One-Sided Deal Hopefully Soon
Gone By: Diane Sori / The Patriot
Factor / Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio

"We will strengthen not only our missiles but also our
air, land and sea forces...When it comes to defending our country, we
will ask nobody for their permission."

- Iranian
President Hassan Rouhani's words said after President Trump's historic U.N. speech

While we have all been focusing on North Korea...and rightfully
so...just three days ago Iran tested their new Khoramshahr
medium-range missile mere hours after it was unveiled at a Tehran
military parade...a successful launch shown on state television
courtesy of in-flight video carried within the missile's nose. And they did so
in direct defiance of warnings issued by President Trump...warnings
alluding to the fact that he was ready to pull the U.S. out of
Obama's 'very bad' nuclear deal...the deal known as the Joint
Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)...a deal signed in 2015 by the
'so-called' P5+1...as in the five permanent members of the U.N.
Security Council...China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, the
United States, plus Germany.

And know that these nations...save for us
of course...still support this deal no matter that Iran continues to
claim that the nuclear deal was never intended to address any other
issues except nuclear bomb building and/or uranium enrichment...meaning
the testing of missiles...delivery or otherwise...was never part of
the deal.

And while the deal itself between Iran and the P5+1 did not specifically
prohibit Iran from developing or testing missiles, the fact is that after the
agreement went into effect the U.N. Security Council adopted a
resolution calling on Iran not to take any actions related to
ballistic missiles...missiles"designed to be capable of delivering
nuclear weapons" for at least eight years...to which Iran
still argues that the tests they are currently conducting are
solely for defensive purposes. Playing the semantics card by using
the wording of the Security Council's own resolution against them, we all
know that said missiles are indeed designed to carry nuclear
warheads...and Iran knows we know and just does not care.

So while President Trump will report to Congress on October 15th
as to whether or not he believes Iran remains in compliance with both
the nuclear deal itself and with the Security Council resolution, and
whether it remains in our best interests to continue to be part of
this still 'very bad' nuclear deal...know that our president has
indeed already made his decision, but being the savvy game player
that he is he knows not to speak of his decision before said
announced date as it would then give our enemy an upper hand of
sorts.

But also know that if President Trump does indeed decide that Iran has not
met its previously agreed upon obligations...especially in regards to their ongoing missile
testing...missile testing that could give them the much needed technical 'smarts'
for a nuclear delivery system by the time the deal's 'sunset clause'
expires in 2025 or even before...that is if they do not already have
it and possibly even be sharing it with North Korea's mad man-child
Kim Jong-un. And that would allow U.S. lawmakers to reimpose
even stricter and more punishing sanctions against the Iranian regime
which, in and of itself, would lead to the collapse of the agreement.

Now as to Iran's newest ballistic missile...Iranian Revolutionary Guard
Aerospace Commander, General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, told reporters that
the Khoramshahr missile just tested has a range of 1,250 miles and
can carry multiple warheads, but quickly added the usual rhetoric
that all of Iran's missiles are only designed to carry conventional
warheads alone...yeah right...and that they have a limited range of
about 1243 miles, but he let it be known that they have the
technology to go further. But none of those mile numbers really
matter as our ally Israel and U.S. bases in the Gulf are already
within Iran's missile range and have been for quite some time.

And now another item of sorts is getting thrown into this nuclear
deal mix for can it really be that with Iran's previous missile tests
being not so different than this newest one has led to an epiphany
moment for National Security
Advisor Gen. H.R. McMaster...a moment so life changing that it led
him to flip on his once diehard support of Obama's 'very bad' nuclear
deal. And why do I say this, on last Thursday's 'New Day' show on CNN,
host Chris Cuomo asked Gen. McMaster what he thought of Obama's
nuclear deal with Iran. First responding by calling
said deal "fundamentally flawed" and that the Trump
White House is concerned about what to do about Iran's "destabilizing
behavior," it washis words, "It
gave the Iranian regime all the benefits upfront...and then the
incompleteness of the deal...which really could give the regime cover
to advance a nuclear program."...that
heralded a complete 180 degree turn from his past words said.

Where Gen. McMaster had once believed
that "establishing regular diplomatic talks with
Tehran could help reduce the suspicion of Iran not fulfilling the
terms of the nuclear deal, and prevent war," he
now has jumped on the 'Trump train'...so to speak...by saying that,
"We've taken a holistic look at this...what's
different about the President's approach is he didn't just look at
the Iran deal -- he placed his decision on the Iran deal on broad
context of how we protect American citizens, American interests, how
we protect our allies and partners from Iran's broad range of
destabilizing behavior."

A complete and total flip-flop
and words I do not for even a moment believe...for these words said
are from the very man whom former Secretary of State John 'Swiftboat'
Kerry alluded to in a speech given on June 5, 2017...months after
McMaster joined the Trump administration...as being the "best
bet" for keeping the
nuclear agreement alive. Interesting words for sure but what exactly
did Kerry base his words upon. How about that from September 2006
until February 2017...in other words up until he was appointed
National Security Advisor replacing Gen. Michael Flynn...McMaster was
listed as a member of the British-based think tank 'International
Institute for Strategic Studies' (IISS).

While at IISS, McMastere served as a
consulting senior fellow regarding military history; civil-military
relations; development and security; and conflict and conflict
prevention. But the sticking point here is that the IISS is bankrolled by many multinational corporate
firms doing billions of dollars in business in and with Iran...our
enemy Iran...and who has as one of the chief donors a George
Soros-funded nonprofit that was identified by the Obama
administration as being central in helping to sell the Iran nuclear
deal to the public and to the media. While of course not serving there
now, McMaster remains in contact with his former colleagues. Now add in that McMaster
basically fired Ezra Cohen-Watnick, a Trump aide, from the National
Security Council simply because he opposed the Iran nuclear deal...he
also removed Rich Higgins, the NSC’s director of strategic planning
and another voice against the Iran nuclear deal...as well as removing
Derek Harvey, who like the others also opposed the Iran deal no
matter that he was the man who held the Middle East portfolio at the
NSC...and McMaster did all this in what some newspapers called a
“sweep of Iran hard-liners.” Then there's rummages now coming
out of D.C. that McMaster has reportedly been continuing to urge both
President Trump himself as well as his administration to re-certify
Iran’s compliance with Obama's 'very bad' nuclear deal no matter
his current words said...no matter that President Trump himself has
rightfully called this deal "one of the worst transactions the
U.S. has ever entered into."

So, the bottom line for me in
regards to Gen. McMaster's newest words regarding what remains a
'very bad' nuclear deal, is that his now flip-flopping placating
words said are said solely to try and save his position withing the
administration...what with more and more folks telling the president
that McMaster might not be who he seems on the surface. And I do not
trust him, I do not believe anything he says, and I so do question
his loyalty to our president for besides the old adage that leopards
never change their spots is that I believe once an islamic condoner
it is a safe bet to say always an islamic condoner.

But even if you remove McMaster
from the mix, one can easily surmise from Iran's own words said that
they have no intention now nor ever of living up to the deal they
agreed to. And that becomes more than a bit obvious in the very words
Iran has repeatedly spewed...words to the affect that it has no
choice but to boost its defenses because its "regional
rivals Israel and Saudi Arabia"
have signed arms contracts with Washington and other Western
governments. "We will strengthen our defense and
military capabilities whether you want it or not," Iran's
President Rouhani said but a few days ago as a direct response to
Trump's 'America First' speech at the U.N. General Assembly last
week.

Adding that Washington "creates
problems for the peoples of our region every day and boast of selling
arms to the bloodthirsty Zionist regime which has been attacking the
peoples of our region for 70 years like a cancerous tumor,"
is something I find quite humorous in a dark and maybe picky sort of
way as Israel has only been a country for 69 years not the 70 years
Iran claims...give these islamic sorts an inch and they will surely
take a mile.

So where does all this leave us
now that we have a president who understands the ramifications that
we've been 'had' by the previous president who catered to the whim of his
brethren over the security of the world. President Trump said it best
in a recent tweet...the U.S. doesn't have "much of an
agreement" after Tehran
again test fired a ballistic missile. And with his adding that "They
are also working with North Korea,"
Trump knows well that we must not let the "murderous
Iranian regime" continue
its destabilizing activities as it builds "dangerous
missiles"...to which I will
add or helps another dangerous regime to do so.

In other words, while we know
President Trump is well-skilled in the 'art of the deal'...in this
case his alluding that he may renegotiate the nuclear pact or
de-certify what he called "one of the worst and most
one-sided transactions" in
U.S. history and a total "embarrassment to the United
States"...is but a smoke
and mirrors buildup for what is his final decision...a final decision
he probably made when Iran publicly stated that renegotiation is not
option. And we know President Trump does not take well to
threats...veiled or otherwise.

Just ask Mr. "Rocket
Man" who now sees U.S. Air
Force bombers and fighter escorts going further north than the
demilitarized zone about the "clear message" that
sends...for actions now taken by this president against America's
enemies do indeed speak louder than even forceful words said. Be ready Iran...you...I'm sure...are
rightfully next on President Trump's 'hit list.'

Copyright @
2017 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor/
All
Rights Reserved

******************************************************

RIGHT SIDE
PATRIOTS...LIVE!

Today, Tuesday, September 26th from 7
to 9pm EST on American Political Radio, RIGHT
SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss the Iranian nuclear deal...could it soon be gone, President Trump's historic U.N. speech, and important news of
the day.

EMAIL FOLLOWERS

Follow My Posts by Email

The Patriot Factor

I am an American Patriot...part of the grassroots movement of bloggers spreading the truth the media will not. I am also co-host with Craig Andresen of RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS on RSP Radio at: https://streamingv2.shoutcast.com/right-side-patriots