Hodges decoded O.J. Simpson’s “suicide note,” deciphered the JonBenet Ramsey ransom note and worked on the Natalee Holloway murder case, and recently analyzed for WND Obama’s comments and arguments during the last presidential debate with Mitt Romney.

He uses a unique psycholinguistic technique he calls “ThoughtPrint Decoding” to “read between the lines” of people’s statements – called “the cutting-edge of forensic science” by expert investigators. He’s not exactly new to the field, already having identified killers by studying ransom notes, emails, letters and police interviews to spot secret confessions. He decoded O.J.’s “suicide note” to confirm Simpson had committed a double murder. He deciphered the JonBenet ransom note from Boulder, Colo., to identify the child’s killer. He decrypted letters from BTK to predict that he was about to kill again – the only profiler to do so. He studied statements by Joran van der Sloot and Deepak Kalpoe to tie them to the slaying of Holloway. He showed how Casey Anthony secretly confessed to killing her daughter in 200 letters written to a jail mate. He even decoded Bill Clinton’s Lewinsky confession on TV, revealing the awful pain which led to Clinton’s self-sabotaging behavior.

About the last debate, he writes, “His [Obama's] super intelligence moral compass causes him to make a huge slip revealing indeed he is a foreigner and an illegal president. First he went on to talk about how he ‘set up a task force to go after cheaters when it came to international [foreign] trade.’ The message: catch the foreign cheater.

“Now for his great slip and confession. He then noted how China the ‘cheater’ was ‘flooding us with cheap domestic – or – or cheap Chinese tires,’” he said.

“The cheating foreigner first appears to have cheap American goods but (clarifying his slip) really the foreigner has cheap foreign goods. Read Obama doesn’t really have American goods, he has foreign goods – cheap goods. A huge confession he has cheapened the presidency – the secret foreigner who passed himself off as American. With his creative slip he tells us that he was a cheap foreign-born imitation of an American president—confessing to how he had specifically terrorized America,” he said.

Hodges explained to WND that a story that Obama told “is the secret language of the unconscious super intelligence – like reading a parable about himself from his own mind.”

“Note he was the one unconsciously calling for the foreign cheater to be confronted – and assigned America the same task. Read stop me – do not vote for a cheater. Appreciate also the foreigner is flooding the market with imitations. Obama’s brilliant super-intel has painted the whole picture. In a 2008 delusional wave of national euphoria he flooded America with a cheap false presidency.

“For the record he repeats the message several times that America won cases against the foreign (Chinese) cheaters suggesting his birth certificate would not stand up in court – as reputable document examiners have testified.”

He continued, “Next Obama brings us truth and lies. At one point he stated that ‘nothing Governor Romney said is true’ referring to Romney’s observation that in the beginning of his presidency Obama had made an apology tour around the world confessing to America’s flaws. Not only had Obama unlike any president in history overtly degraded and demeaned America, such a distortion of that fact suggests a complete projection and that ‘nothing Obama says is true.’ If indeed he is an illegal president such words would fit hand-in-glove because he could not utter one truthful word as an authentic president.”

Hodges concludes that Obama is telling America, “I’ve got a different vision for America.”

“Think about it. He has confessed to an illegal presidency with a magnificent slip in the final presidential debate before the vote – saved a special confession for last. Never underestimate such a crucial slip (similar to his slip taking the presidential oath when it had to be repeated privately and when he referred to his ‘Muslim faith’ during an interview.),” he said.

Hodges previously reported that during Obama’s first two presidential debates with Romney, the president repeatedly confessed to being ineligible.

“From my experience as a forensic profiler, I know when a guilty person starts to break. Law enforcement describes how guilty suspects show signs of cracking during an interrogation – and they push on those weaknesses. We can view Obama’s poor performance during the first presidential debate with Romney on Oct. 3 in a similar way. The debate – a symbolic interrogation – was the first time Obama had faced tough questions since 2008,” Hodges said at the time.

“And he showed signs of cracking.”

He continued, “All in all we have a behavioral confession: ‘I do not belong in this office.’ A non-verbal confession of his illegal presidency.”

“Regarding the first debate, several key commentators including WND’s Joseph Farah theorized that some powerful integrity issue among Obama donors was greatly distracting him. But Farah suggests he intuitively picked up on the deepest integrity reason as his column showed. He observed Obama falling apart beyond belief, and noted that Obama ”grew increasingly uneasy, nervous … an inability to think clearly on his feet.’ He underscored an extreme deficit in Obama’s ‘executive capabilities’ (all these are signs of cracking) and raises the key question, ‘Why are we seeing this now?’” Hodges wrote.

“Farah emphasizes that Obama was never challenged as a candidate and, most importantly, was ‘never screened for constitutional eligibility.’ Farah recognizes that such a major offense would mean enormous guilt deep down.

“Consider that Obama’s unconscious super intelligence was posing the toughest question of all by his behavior and poor performance: ‘Have those of you who missed my secret confession and lack of media vetting ever seriously asked if I am a legal president, if I belong in office?’ In short, a hidden confession. Obama demonstrates the power of the unconscious super intelligence to have its way and how the conscious mind is no match for someone who must confess.”

On Hodges’ website, Steven A. Egger, associate professor of criminology at the University of Houston, Clear Lake, has written that Hodges’ technique is “becoming the cutting edge of forensic science.”

“Dr. Hodges’ investigation of forensic documents in the Natalee Holloway case indicates that his ‘thoughtprint decoding method’ and ‘reading between the lines’ is, in fact, becoming a major contribution to law enforcement tools used by criminal investigators,” wrote Egger.