Say it ain't so Speckslayer. Guess where the epicenter of the problem is - Fresno, Hanover, and Bakersfield. So if passed, everyone in the State is going to have to pay for Ag pollution they had nothing to do with. The bill sites contaminated drinking water in individuals and communities water systems.

Not to worry as Spackslyer has assured us when I brought up the issue,

"Because all the naive people foolishly believe that Fiji water is better than tap water! Just like all the scare tactics and fake propaganda you are promoting."

The Resnicks are playing both sides again for profit, polluting and depleting groundwater and at the same promoting and selling "safe, clean, "Fiji Water"

Say it ain't so Speckslayer. Guess where the epicenter of the problem is - Fresno, Hanover, and Bakersfield. So if passed, everyone in the State is going to have to pay for Ag pollution they had nothing to do with. The bill sites contaminated drinking water in individuals and communities water systems.

Not to worry as Spackslyer has assured us when I brought up the issue,

"Because all the naive people foolishly believe that Fiji water is better than tap water! Just like all the scare tactics and fake propaganda you are promoting."

The Resnicks are playing both sides again for profit, polluting and depleting groundwater and at the same promoting and selling "safe, clean, "Fiji Water"

Your hit piece is comical and shows your lack of knowledge on the topic.

The first contaminant listed in the article is arsenic. I wonder how much of that the farmers put the water? Oh yeah, God put it there. Oh yeah, God put it there. The second contaminant is nitrates. Did you know that if you go up to the edge of the farm ground on the east side of Fresno that contamination levels are higher due to natural leaching from natural sources then they are out in the middle of farm country? And where do you think all the nitrates from your P and Pooh end up after they get the sewer farm? How about leaching straight down into the ground water!

In fairness, farmers did put their fair share of nitrates into the ground water too. But blaming today's farmers for that problem is like blaming you as a hunter for the extinction of the passenger pigeon. Today's farmers apply much less nitrogen and apply it much more specifically so that they don't cause the problem that older generations do. Nevertheless, most of the tax will be paid by a tax on fertilizers (farmers), with only a small tax on the city folks (per your article).

Nevertheless, most of the tax will be paid by a tax on fertilizers (farmers), with only a small tax on the city folks (per your article).

Let's debate facts, not misrepresentations.

Click to expand...

And in all fairness the increase in tax with be passed on to the consumer...ME..some where along the line.. The farmer in all fairness is not going to take any increases out of his profit margin..he's got to make a livin..

MEMBER OF TEAM HUMPY

Duck "lives" Matter

As noted by BenelliArt on a Birdless November hunt..."ya got to have high ducks before you can get low ducks"

Yes you're gonna pay, as you should. Farmers use nitrogen to increase production which lowers food prices. If you want them to use less nitrogen then production will decrease and prices will rise.

Farmers are simply employees of the consumer. We will grow whatever food you will pay the most for. We grow it as cheaply as we can and that ultimately translates to cheaper prices for you. If you want increased minimum wages and vacation time and sick time and all kinds of other things for our employees, prices will rise and you will pay for it because that's what you wanted. When this happens, it will stress the smaller farmers and they will sell out to the larger corporate farmers.

I talked to my farmworker friend "Jose" in Fresno, and he say that when he asked the Fresno Chamber of Commerce about water quality problems they say they know nothing, no problem. How come statewide tax on all drinking water proposed for Fresno water quality and Fresno know nothing for public consumption? Why they have lack of knowledge? Have they been politically polluted?
Concerning nitrates, he say he wants his newborn children to be brown not blue.

Speckslayer message to all Californians,
"Yes you're gonna pay, as you should. Farmers use nitrogen to increase production..."

Last edited: Sep 24, 2017

Craig Bell - American Free Agent

Moderator - Deep State Secret Society Forum

In Vino Veritus

Never underestimate a Field Bred Springer

I agree with Rick and go with acrylics. I like the upper-level ornithology tested, amped-up, caricature of duck's calls.

Butte City - A quaint little drinking town with a duck hunting problem and Strippers during Duck season.

My Springers are royalty me, just a lucky peasant.

The perfect new bird is one that arrives fat or has been here long enough to fatten up but not smart-ten up.

I talked to my farmworker friend "Jose" in Fresno, and he say that when he asked the Fresno Chamber of Commerce about water quality problems they say they know nothing, no problem. How come statewide tax on all drinking water proposed for Fresno water quality and Fresno know nothing for public consumption? Why they have lack of knowledge? Have they been politically polluted?
Concerning nitrates, he say he wants his newborn children to be brown not blue.

Speckslayer message to all Californians,
"Yes you're gonna pay, as you should. Farmers use nitrogen to increase production..."

Click to expand...

LMAO! You're funny

Why won't you address the arsenic groundwater issue?

Why won't you address the natural causes of nitrogen in our groundwater?

Why won't you address the fact that the fertilizer tax will be paid for by farmers and will be the major funding source for water clean up (per your article)?

Shall we go back farther? Why won't you address all the falsehoods promoted by the enviros over the Alaska Pipeline and the caribou?

Maybe because you have an agenda that isn't supported by the facts so you just say whatever sounds good at the time and hope people buy your bag of goods?

Click to expand...

In California, the state is only just starting to address the primary source of this contaminant in the San Joaquin Valley's groundwater: the Valley's five million acres (two million hectares) of farmland. A study led by Thomas Harter and Jay Lund of UC–Davis found that, in the state's main agricultural counties, 96 percent of the human-generated nitrate in groundwater came from cropland. The biggest sources were synthetic fertilizer (54 percent) and animal manure (33 percent). Fertilizer application followed by irrigation drives excess nitrate down through the soil and into aquifers.

Click to expand...

I won't even bother fact checking the rest, if that one is a lie I'm sure the rest are also.