Lincoln-Calhoun Composite

The above famous photoportrait of Abraham Lincoln has his head placed upon the photo of another politician, John C. Calhoun. The trickery is attributed to Thomas Hicks – a portrait painter from that era who had painted Lincoln before — who was thought to have created this composite in the early to mid-1860s. Many historians believed that the photo was created after Lincoln’s assassination because there were hardly any heroic, Presidential looking portraits of Lincoln at that time. Calhoun’s image is a wood cut while the image of Lincoln is detailed, because it was taken from Mathew Brady’s portrait of Abraham Lincoln, the same one later used for $5 bills.

In his haste, Hicks didn’t noticed that when he flipped the Brady photo, the President’s famous mole would appear on the wrong side of his face. It was only years later that Stefan Lorant, the art director for the London Picture Post magazine, noticed that the photo was a fake.

The irony was that John C. Calhoun, a former vice president of the Untied States, was a vocal figure on states rights, and an inspiration for the Southern secessionists, even though he died a decade before the Civil War. Calhoun was an outspoken proponent of slavery and talked about it as a “positive good”.

Great paring, but Hicks wasn’t the culprit. Thomas Hicks (1823-1890) painted the original portrait of Calhoun after a photograph of Matthew Brady (ca. 1823-1896). Alexander Hay Ritchie (1822-1895) created a mezzotint (copper plate engraving) portrait of Calhoun based on the painting in 1852. I’m now working on editing the brief catalog entry for the mezzotint – but a high resolution scan from the original has been made by the Library of Congress’ Prints & Photographs Division: http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2003679757/ . Then, some time in the 1860s, and likely after Lincoln’s death, the New York printmaker William Pate created a mezzotint based on Ritchie’s and replaced Calhoun’s head with that of Lincoln. I’m now working on enhancing the catalog record, which is available here – http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2003654314/ . The Brady image of Calhoun was not a daguerreotype, but a wet, collodian glass plate negative, also in the collections of the Library of Congress – http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/brh2003004601/PP/.

The Brady image of Calhoun had to be a daguerreotype. The wet, collodian glass plate process was not invented until 1851 and not in use until until 1852. Calhoun died in 1850. Thus, the Brady portrait could not have been collodian made…it must have been daguerreotype (egg-white).

So what’s the story behind John Russell Pope’s design of Calhoun College at Yale, and his people, agents, employees? creating the stained glass image of the Hick’s painting and substituting for the globe and flag and kneeling slave in chains? It is obvious the image was not designed to honor Calhoun but to dishonor him. Ditto for the other stained glass images, the two Africans in the field with baskets of wheat on their heads, etc.

[…] Stefan Lorant was compiling a book in the late 1950s and realized that Lincoln’s mole was on the wrong side of his face – and that this photograph is the same as the one on the $5 bill, except in […]

[…] What does this mean exactly? Why have humans become so gullible? Are we moving towards an age where we are becoming lazier, and accepting the first piece of information thrown at us? Image Source […]

[…] 1957, then revised in 1969) when he discovered something odd: in the Hicks print, Lincoln’s mole was on the wrong side of his face. After some investigation, he realized that Lincoln’s face in the print exactly matched his face […]