‘Two Nations Are in Your Womb’: Unificationism and Partitioned States (1948-2018)

Unificationism promises the advent of a unified world, where heaven, humankind and earth live in harmony. On the path toward unification, a major obstacle is that of partitioned states, beginning with Korea.

University of Pennsylvania political scientist Brendan O’Leary defines political partition as “an externally proposed or imposed fresh border cut through at least one community’s national homeland, creating at least two separate units under different sovereigns and authorities.”

Partitions have occurred throughout history, seldom bringing good results. Some were considered a “lesser evil” or a “necessary evil.” Here I consider contemporary partitions which have been or still are major obstacles for the Providence.

The “Two nations are in your womb” paradigm

Unificationism in general sees partitions as resulting from a failure of human responsibility to achieve unity or integration. There is then a division into two parts, one representing relative good (Abel) and the other relative evil (Cain). A major input of Unificationism is to emphasize the pivotal role of women in the origin (Eve) of and the final solution (Rebecca) to the partition.

When Rebecca protested to God about the struggle of the two twins, Esau and Jacob, in her womb, the Lord said to her, “Two nations are in your womb, and two peoples from within you will be separated; one people will be stronger than the other, and the older will serve the younger.” (Gen. 25:23)

This paradigm of the “two nations in the womb” is relevant in four of the five cases presented here.

The external cause of many partitions in the 20th century was the process of decolonization: the colonial power was unable to give birth to two communities or states living harmoniously and cooperatively, but gave birth to twins sharply pitted against one another.

I cover five partitions which had a direct impact on the Providence, grouped together for three reasons of direct concern for Unificationism:

The five cases took place in 1947-48, when True Father entered Hungnam prison camp. Three took place in May 1948, 70 years ago.

They were serious and each resulted in a nuclear arms race, a problem addressed by True Mother, Mrs. Hak Ja Han Moon.

Four of them were very typical of the “two nations are in your womb” paradigm.

The main partition concerned Korea. With the winds of change blowing in Korea this past spring, 70 years after its permanent partition, this discussion is timely.

The tragic partitions of 1948

According to Divine Principle, through the world wars, the world was gradually divided into two antagonistic camps, one on God’s side, the other on Satan’s side. This worldwide division is the prelude to the final unification of humankind under the Lord of the Second Advent. He comes to give rebirth to humanity through his marriage with the Bride. True Father, Rev. Sun Myung Moon, and True Mother together enable Cain and Abel, divided throughout history, to be reborn in the Mother’s womb and go to the True Father.

This process was to start right after World War II. True Father began his public ministry in Korea, which gained independence on August 15, 1945, after, in effect, 40 years of colonial rule by Japan (but Korea was temporarily divided at the 38th parallel to effect the surrender of Japanese troops to the U.S. and USSR). One may see a similarity with Vietnam, a former French colony, also occupied by Japan (1941-45). At the end of World War II, southern Vietnam surrendered to the British who returned it to French control, while the Chinese accepted Ho Chi Minh’s provisional government in Hanoi. In 1954, Vietnam was divided into two states. Three decades of war resulted in reunification under a communist regime in 1975.

“Mother Japan,” North and South Korea

Tragically, independence from Japan gave birth to two enemy nations, North Korea under Soviet influence, and South Korea, under American influence. Divine Principle sees Japan as the Eve nation among the Axis powers of World War II. Japan did not cause the division directly, but its military presence on the peninsula required that the Allied nations receive the surrender of its troops.

During 1945-48, there may have been a possibility for a less tragic outcome than the permanent division of Korea in May 1948. And the same uncertainty existed, during the same period, in the four other cases we shall review. Tragically, in 1948, partitions occurred in five places around the globe, the most serious in Korea, the homeland of Unificationism. Why?

After being tortured by the police, Reverend Moon continued preaching in Pyongyang, North Korea, was arrested in February 1948, and put on trial. He was sent to Hungnam prison on May 20, 1948.

Ten days earlier, Constitutional Assembly elections were held in southern Korea, under American military occupation, supervised by the United Nations (the Soviets would not permit the UN to supervise elections in the north, who instead set up a Supreme People’s Assembly in August 1948), which led to the formation of the Republic of Korea on August 15, 1948 and Democratic People’s Republic of Korea on September 9, 1948. Many foreign observers and some Korean politicians opposed the idea of holding elections in the south at that time because it could jeopardize the possibility of future unification. De facto partition was about to become a de jure partition between two states belonging to two ideological camps.

The election stirred violence throughout South Korea. During the Jeju uprising and its suppression (April 1948-August 1949), up to 10% of the island’s population was killed. Another 40,000 fled to Japan. The new nation was truly born under a bad sign, and this situation became even worse two years later, with the outbreak of the Korean War.

“Korea, the nation where Christ will return, is the place most dear to God and most abhorred by Satan. It is a place where the forces of democracy and the forces of communism collide. This line of confrontation is Korea’s thirty-eighth parallel, which was drawn to fulfill the providence of God. At the point of confrontation, a sacrifice must be offered as the condition to determine the outcome of their struggle. The Korean people were this sacrifice, to be offered for the sake of the restoration of the universe. Therefore, God divided the Korean nation, just as Abraham’s sacrifices were supposed to be divided. This is the reason behind the division of Korea…, which split it into two nations: one Cain-type and the other Abel-type.”

‘‘Two nations are in your womb’’

Mother England, Israel and Palestine

The partition that occurred in May 1948 put an end to the British Mandate of Palestine (1920-48), established following the defeat of the Ottoman empire in World War I. The United Kingdom, acting as a mother with twins in her womb, could not find a solution for the coexistence of Palestine’s Jews and Arabs.

The UN played a crucial role in the inception of the Republic of Korea. It was also involved in the birth of the State of Israel and in November 1947 proposed a partition of Palestine under the British Mandate between Jewish and Arab states. The Arabs rejected the proposal, resulting in civil war between Palestinian Arabs and Jews, and the Jews proclaimed their independence on May 14, 1948. The next day, a coalition of Arab states declared war on Israel.

After seven decades, no solution has yet been found to offer peaceful coexistence between Israel and Palestine, such as a two-state solution with agreed upon borders.

Palestine exists as a de jure sovereign state, and is recognized by the United Nations if not by many individual states, but is itself divided between the Gaza Strip, under Hamas rule, and the West Bank under the PLO (partition within the partition). The existence of Jewish settlements within the Occupied Territories creates further partitions within these major partitions, thus making the daily life of Palestinians extremely difficult.

Apartheid and the partition of South Africa

“Apartheid” is an Afrikaans word meaning “separateness” to describe the ideology and action plan of separated development (and racial segregation) in South Africa. South Africa had gained independence from the United Kingdom in 1910. The country had just experienced the second Boer War, where the British empire finally defeated the Afrikaner States. The Afrikaners were very resentful for this defeat. Many had been put into concentration camps. Apartheid can also be seen as revenge against England.

During the elections of May 26, 1948, Jan Smuts was defeated by pastor Daniel François Malan who had promised to implement apartheid. Smuts had coined the term holism. He believed that South Africa could gradually become a multiracial nation with equal rights. Smuts was the only person to sign the charters of both the League of Nations and the United Nations.

Map of the black homelands in South Africa at the end of apartheid in 1994

After Malan’s victory, apartheid dominated South Africa for 40 years. The regime had a totalitarian policy against the majority of the population (black and colored). The ethnic segregation practiced in South Africa resulted in the partitions of its territory into Bantustans (homelands). Bantustans represented only 13% of the territory and were enclaves within a vast territory controlled and populated by whites.

The apartheid system was dismantled in 1990. The economic and social problems existing in South Africa have not all been resolved. But South Africa has proven it can survive as a multiracial country where whites are now the minority but are able to contribute in a much more meaningful way than before to South Africa’s role as a regional power.

Gandhi and the vivisection of mother India

India is the fourth case of a partition (1947-48) with the paradigm of “two nations are in your womb.” Mahatma Gandhi sought the independence of India from the United Kingdom. Yet, he was aware the British empire had been able to maintain a multiethnic and multireligious India. As independence approached, Gandhi tried to act as a motherly figure having “two twins within him”: the Muslim leader, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, and the Hindu leader, Jawaharlal Nehru.

But Jinnah gradually shifted to the two-nation theory, which held that the primary identity and unifying denominator of Muslims in the Indian subcontinent was their religion, not their language or ethnicity. Indian Hindus and Muslims were thus two distinct nations, regardless of ethnic or other commonalities. The two-nation theory was a founding principle of the Pakistan Movement partition from India. The partition of British India in August 1947 displaced over 14 million people, causing immense suffering on both sides. Gandhi, watching what he called the “vivisection of the mother,” fell into despair. He did not survive the partition. A Hindu nationalist assassinated Gandhi in January 1948.

The partition of Europe (1948-89)

The final partition of 1948 was that of Europe. The situation on the Korean peninsula remained uncertain in 1945-48. So did the situation of Europe for the three years after World War II. The Soviets had their sphere of influence in Eastern Europe, but it was only in 1948 that two camps gradually emerged, after the Prague coup of February 1948. The Stalinization of Eastern Europe actually began in 1948-49 and lasted exactly 40 years, until the nonviolent revolutions that culminated with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. The partition of Europe, especially the division of Germany into two rival states, is closest to the Korean partition — with two major differences. First, the paradigm of “two nations are in your womb’’ is not applicable. Second, while we can understand that the postwar partition of Germany was necessary because of its crimes committed under Nazi rule, the injustice of imposing partition upon Korea, the victim of Japanese imperialism, is obvious.

Partitions and nuclear proliferation

Each of the partitions above resulted in efforts to build the atomic bomb. Conversely, the end of apartheid prompted South Africa to abandon its nuclear weapons. Nuclear proliferation which has gone uncontrolled since World War II is largely a consequence of these partitions.

In postwar Europe, the United Kingdom and France both launched nuclear programs. The rest of Western Europe was under the nuclear umbrella of the United States. The ideological confrontation between NATO and the Warsaw Pact was marked by nuclear deterrence.

The May 1948 war proved the entire Arab world rejected the existence of the State of Israel. Over the years, Israel developed its own nuclear capability but will not acknowledge it.

South Africa, under apartheid, developed its own nuclear weapons and was prompted to accelerate its program with the emergence of communist regimes in Angola and Madagascar.

The proliferation of nuclear weapons in Asia is also largely due to partitions. The New Delhi government was initially compelled to develop nuclear capabilities to deter potential Chinese aggression. The short war between Pakistan and India in 1971 accelerated its program and the first nuclear device was tested under Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in 1974. That year, Pakistan Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto stressed he would never accept “Indian hegemony or domination over the subcontinent.” In 1965, he declared, “If India builds the bomb, we will eat grass or leaves, even go hungry, but we will get one of our own. We have no alternative.”

He later also said:

“We know that Israel and South Africa have full nuclear capability. That Christian, Jewish and Hindu civilizations have this capability. The Communist powers also possess it. Only the Islamic civilization was without it, but that position was about to change.”

More recently, the most serious global crisis of nuclear proliferation came from the Korean peninsula. South Korean president Park Chung-hee first spoke of his desire to possess nuclear weapons in 1975. However, South Korea did not develop a nuclear weapons capability, restrained by the U.S. On the other hand, by 2017, Pyongyang began to reach its maturity as a nuclear power. In 1962, the country began a process called “all-fortressization,” which included the total militarization of the nation and the development of nuclear capabilities. However, both the USSR and China were reluctant to help their ideological ally achieve nuclear capability. In the early 1990s, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, North Korea slowly built up its own nuclear capability, through the most recent crisis last year.

Conclusions

What can be done in 2018, 70 years after Korean division? At their Singapore summit in June, Chairman Kim Jong Un reportedly said to President Donald Trump, “Many people in the world will think of this as a form of fantasy…from a science fiction movie.”

Did he feel that, behind the chronos, historical and man-measured time, a mysterious kairos was at work? As True Mother often emphasizes, human efforts are not sufficient. In the 1980s, a peaceful end to partitions in Europe or in South Africa seemed unlikely. Yet, all Eastern Europe was swept by the winds of change in 1989: the Berlin Wall fell and Germany quickly achieved reunification. In South Africa, the end of apartheid was accomplished in the same period. Two partitions were thus overcome after a “biblical period” of 40 years. At that time, prospects for change also existed in the Middle East and in Korea.

The current situation in Korea seems unpredictable and yet fated by destiny. Seventy years after the permanent division of 1948, powerful factors are working to bring about denuclearization, a possible prelude to unification. Externally, three heads of state are doing their best: after the first meeting between President Moon Jae In and Chairman Kim Jong Un in Panmunjom on April 27, President Donald Trump held his historical meeting with Kim in Singapore on June 12.

Internally, Unificationists should believe that God almighty is fully exercising His will behind the scenes. True Mother, in leading the Unification movement, has proclaimed herself the only begotten daughter of God, a new theological concept. For the past two years, she increasingly has described herself as the mother of all humankind, presiding over huge rallies in Japan, Korea, the USA, Europe, and soon, Latin America. In the current religious world, she is the only woman leading a comprehensive global campaign for peace. After her rally in Seoul in November 2017, attended by 80,000, positive inter-Korean momentum began in January, leading to the breakthrough of the Winter Olympics in February. Even when Chairman Kim and President Moon met in April at Panmunjom, True Mother’s attitude was the entire situation was in God’s hands. She never directly spoke of the political situation. However, clearly the dramatic changes now taking place on the divided Korean peninsula are more than mere coincidence.♦

6 thoughts on “‘Two Nations Are in Your Womb’: Unificationism and Partitioned States (1948-2018)”

Thank you, Laurent, for tying these strands together and weaving a convincing narrative for recent historical divisions not just in Korea but in other areas of the world. 1948 was a crucial year for representatives of world Christianity to accept True Father but due to their failure there was inevitable division, suffering and indemnity as manifested in the unfolding of events in the conflicts that you alluded to around the world. This is a propitious time to bring peaceful reunification in Korea and there is a new window of opportunity to solve other intractable divisions as well.

Despite Dr. Ladouce’s claim that “the United Kingdom, acting as a mother with twins in her womb, could not find a solution for the coexistence of Palestine’s Jews and Arabs,” England and the United Nations did find a solution. It was to divide the British Mandate in Palestine into two nations, Israel and Jordan, with the dividing line being the Jordan River. The nation of Jordan was supposed to be for Palestinian Arabs and Israel for Palestinian Jews. (During the British Mandate all inhabitants of British Palestine were issued Palestinian ID papers regardless of religion or ancestry. Israeli Prime Minister Begin often displayed his official Palestinian ID issued by the British.)

In May of 1948, the British-led Army of Jordan invaded what today is called the West Bank and captured it (including the old city of Jerusalem). The armies of Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq also invaded Israel in May of 1948. The West Bank was officially annexed by Jordan on April 24, 1950.

Being driven out of the West Bank in 1967, Jordan ceded its claims to the West Bank to the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization) in 1974 after the Arab League decided to recognize the PLO as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people.

I enjoyed reading your analysis. The ideas of Japan and the UK being nations in the “mother” position is interesting. Both had colonies (“children”) that divided like Cain and Abel when they were freed or allowed to “grow up.” The role of raising children is that they can stand on their own feet, care for themselves, and help others. Colonial nations did not do that.

As you point out most of the partitions in the world are the result of colonization, where the colonizer did not have the role of raising its colonies to independence at its heart, but to use colonized nations for selfish strategic or economic purposes.

Certainly, the role of True Parents is to raise children to be independent individuals that can take responsibility for themselves. This requires both motherly and fatherly aspects of child raising. The role of True Mother can be important, especially in Korea, but I think it is time for Unificationists to stop looking to her or waiting for her, for such Unificationists are reluctant to take responsibility for these things themselves, and reveal themselves to be remaining in a child position. Each of us should guide our countries in ways that lead to unification. In the United States, many of the features of countries that are partitioned are present in the division between political parties.

Germany was also divided in the post-war period, as was Korea and Palestine. However, Germany had been self-sufficient before the war, so unification was easier to achieve without war. The most tragic areas is where, in the absence of a colonizer, people are unable to create functionally independent states. Palestine is an example, because in its history there were times when Israel attempted to honor the two-state solution but Palestinians were unable to govern their own territory successfully. They were unable to police themselves and prevent Hamas from occupying them and shooting missiles at Israel. If a state cannot control its ability not to lash out at others, it simply isn’t going to make an acceptable participant in a community of nations. North Korea suffers from the inability to deliver economic development, because it has failed, as a parent, to enable its people to become individual sovereign agents and entrepreneurs.

Ultimately good parenting, whether it be of individuals or states, is the answer. I believe that True Parents have already provided us with that model and now it is our turn to inherit and act on true parental principles and help overcome such divisions. When we continue to look to others to lead, we miss the point. True Father lived into his 90s. Certainly, the nature of the lifecycle requires children to act as adults before the parents become so old, and not continue to depend on them, when their health is failing. For this reason, I think that it is good to honor True Mother, who is now in her mid-seventies, but it is the time for Unificationists in their 40s through 70s to be taking the leading role on these problems today.

Thanks to everyone for their comments. I am particularly grateful to Gary Fleischer for his valuable clarification regarding the case of Israel and Palestine.

Regarding the external factors which caused these partitions, I would mention:

(1) Decolonization.

(2) The war against the Axis powers. We should bear in mind that decolonization took place in the wake of World War II. Without the worlwide war theater, the process of decolonization would have been less dramatic.

(3) The beginning of the Cold War, in the cases of the two Koreas and of Europe.

This being said, the central factor is internal. These partitions are tragic re-enactments of the struggle between Cain and Abel, with nuclear consequences. These partitions took place at the onset of the world mission of the Lord of the Second Advent, and are more than mere political phenomena. In essence, they are eschatological. The world wars were signs of the Last Days and have sometimes been described as “apocalyptic.” Likewise, there is an eschatological dimension in these partitions. It may explain why human efforts seem so powerless to solve them, and why the degree of hatred is so deep.

We may also consider that key central figures were providentially lost at that time. A man like Gandhi, who had stayed 21 years in South Africa before returning to India, died without being able to offer the Hindu foundation to the Messiah. Jan Smuts of South Africa, missed the chance to attend the Lord of Second Advent. Father once described the years 1945-52 as the “golden years” if the Messiah had been accepted. Besides the violence and hatred, there is the grief of God, because human responsibility failed.

Regarding Japan as the mother nation, it is good to remember that in Japan today, almost 900,000 people are ethnic Koreans who have permanent residency status, or who have become Japanese citizens, and whose immigration to Japan originated before 1945, or who are descendants of those immigrants. These Koreans are split into two groups, the Chongryon Koreans who support Pyongyang and are isolated in Japan, and the Mindan Koreans who are pro-Seoul, and generally well-integrated into Japanese society. Father said, “Japan is in part responsible for the division of the Korean peninsula into North and South” (April 3, 1992) and “Chongryon and Mindan, both of which belong to the Eve nation of Japan, are in the position of Cain and Abel, Esau and Jacob, or Zerah and Perez. Two factions are fighting within Eve’s womb. This is necessary for the country to become the Eve nation (April 13, 1992).”

I am interested to know more about the providential interpretation of the partition of Cameroon after the World War I. Cameroon was a German colony and after the defeat of Germany, it was partitioned between Britain (British Cameroons) and France (French Cameroun) as mandated territory under the League of Nations and later after World War II as a trust territory of the UN under these two colonial masters. After quasi-independence in 1960 and 1961 for French and British regions respectively and quasi-reunification in 1972, the country is experiencing today (since 2016) what can be termed a cultural genocide of English-speaking regions of Cameroon under forced assimilation by French-speaking and government still controlled by France. Cameroon is known as Africa in miniature. What relevance does this have in the providence and the current situation of Africa? Why is it happening now? What is the course to take? What is TP point of view on this situation?

Yes, the fate of Cameroon should make us reflect. Germany had several colonies in Africa. In the case of Togoland (1894-1914), it was very well developed by Germany and then cut into two parts. The current French-speaking part has not been able to secure a democratic regime yet.

One-third of the former German Togoland is now the eastern part of Ghana, English-speaking, and one of the most democratic nations of Africa. Even if there is no request for a “unified Togo,” we may well imagine the feelings that may sometimes exist across the border. Fortunately, Togo is integrated in a region which is dynamic, and located on the “corridor of prosperity” between Abidjan and Lagos. Part of the Togolese question will be solved in the region-building.

The case of Cameroon is becoming tragic.

I visited Cameroon twice, because my father was a surgeon in Yaounde. The second time was in December 1974. Forty days later, I was witnessed in my hometown in France. My mother was devastated and came back from Cameroon, trying to snatch me away from God’s calling. I have been reflecting on this.

Ever since that time, I have kept a special feeling for Cameroon, a country with a great potential. The current division seems to also reflect the current regime, 34 years under Paul Biya. We can well imagine the wonderful role that Cameroon could play, as a mediator between West Africa and Central Africa. It has a border with Nigeria, the most powerful state of Africa, English-speaking, and its other borders are with French-speaking nations. I really cannot say much, but I feel that we need to pray about it, because the summit in South Africa is coming soon.

Search the AU Blog

Search

Commenting

To post a comment on an article, at the bottom of a page, click inside the box under where it says “Please leave a comment or reply.” Type your comment, full name, email, and website (if any). Then, click “Post Comment” or “Post a Reply.”

Comments should not be article-length. If you want to post a longer comment, you are encouraged to submit an article to the AU Blog for consideration (see our guidelines here). We welcome a diversity of points-of-view.

No anonymous comments. Please use your full, real name, not a handle or pseudonym.

Unlike on Facebook or an email list, all comments are moderated, and there is a delay in posting. Please write in a polite tone specifically regarding the article in question; self-promotional comments are discouraged. Commenting on this site is a privilege, not a right.

Applied Unificationism is a place where the future of the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification (FFWPU) may be thoughtfully discussed, but is not a site for criticism of its leadership.

The AU Blog posts a comment at its sole discretion, may edit for length, content and germaneness, or clarity, and reserves the right to limit the number of comments posted by an individual in a period of time. Ad hominem attacks on the persons or motivations of other writers, commenters, this Blog, or its sponsor are not acceptable.

This site will not tolerate the denigration, direct or indirect, of other faiths, races, minorities, and cultures. A bullying or disparaging tone directed toward AU Blog readers in a comment is not permitted.

You may contact an author directly by clicking his/her name in their byline.

Readers may rate comments using a five-star system.

Re-blogging

A brief excerpt of AU Blog content may be quoted as long as a link is provided to the source page and authorship properly attributed. Please use Facebook’s sharing feature rather than post articles in full on Facebook. Posting of a PDF of an AU Blog article on another site must also include full attribution, including the source as “Applied Unificationism” and the article’s posting date.