Search This Blog

After decades of Biblical study, I continue to discover there is much deeper meaning than I had ever imagined.
Christ calls me to
-people I'd not expect;
-be politically active for justice;
-love without restriction;
-accept those from whom I would normally recoil;
-be a student of the Bible and also the society in which I live;
-see the economic, social, and spiritual struggles of others;
-be a prophetic voice for justice, mercy, compassion, grace, and love;
-be transformed.
What about you?

Subscribe to this blog

Follow by Email

Adapting to Realities - Acts 17:10-22

Fundamentalism is characterized by a static concept of faith and belief. It is a tightly packaged system of belief more in keeping with a philosophical construct or a time-stamped cultural perspective than with a living faith. The structures and definitions of Fundamentalism make for a secure belief system in the short term. It can be appealing, especially to those who want quick answers to the complex issues of life. It offers hard and fast answers, an enemy to oppose, and the security of belonging to a group with a defined expression of the truth for all time. The problem is that it fails at adapting to the shifting realities of life.

If life requires adaptation, fundamentalism seeks to restore life to a supposed golden age of some idyllic utopia or plan for some new implementation of the same. What it fails to account for is that as life changes around us the answers of another year do not respond appropriately to the struggles and questions of a new age. It also fails to account for the failures of humanity which may have been overcome to some degree since.

We may attempt to glorify a misremembered past. Attempting to recreate it in a new context, however, is not so simple. In terms of faith, the same applies. We consider some aspects of faith, such as church attendance, but divorce them from non-faith factors that were in play. We grasp onto some moral issues while overlooking others. We look at divorce rates, but ignore domestic violence that in earlier years went unreported. We look at church membership, but we ignore the dearth of other social opportunities beyond the church. We look at rates of baptism, but we ignore questions of commitment to the gospel and adopting the priorities or character of Christ Jesus.

For Paul, there were other issues in regard to the more fundamentalist mindset from which he had come. His heritage had very strong ideas of what was right. His traditions were focused on the need to follow God's revealed will within the traditions of the elders in order for the Jewish people to receive the blessings God had in store. There was a reason to enforce their definitions upon others. If the people did not follow their traditions, they believed God would punish the entire nation and keep the Messianic age from becoming reality.

In the process of living out that concept, there were Jews throughout the Roman Empire who were focused on silencing Paul's preaching since it countered their traditions. Accepting the concept of redemption as the product of grace pulled out the major supporting framework for their doctrinal system. If God dealt with people on the basis of grace, they would lose the structure of their faith traditions and any sense of confidence in their religious heritage. To deny observance of the law was in their eyes to deny God and place Judaism as a whole in jeopardy.

Paul knew very well that the message he preached was disconcerting to many. He understood that it was no easy thing for Jews to adopt Paul's preaching without having to let go of the entirety of their faith. Shifting from the priorities of traditional Judaism to accepting what Jesus had taught was a major change not to be taken lightly. It meant moving from a dependence on the quality of one's actions to accepting that God desired reconciliation to the point of overlooking one's failures to measure up. For one to adopt this understanding of the extent of God's grace could mean putting one's life in jeopardy if Paul's gospel proved to be wrong. That was a risky prospect.

Paul had been preaching in Thessalonica. Some of the synagogue members had listened to his preaching and embraced the gospel wholeheartedly. Others had been incensed with Paul, especially when Gentile converts accepted Paul's preaching. Rather than accepting that God might be willing to overlook the failings of Gentiles as well as Jews, they grasped onto their Jewish heritage with greater vigor than before. They stirred up the town to force Paul to be kicked out, hoping to silence him. When they heard he had gone to Berea to continue his preaching, they followed along to stir up the population of Berea, as well.

The example of the Bereans was a very different approach than that of the Jews in Thessalonica. They did indeed embrace Paul's message. Along with that embrace, however, they took the time and effort to test what Paul presented with a fresh review of the Scriptures. They did not simply take Paul at his word. Nor did they simply cling to their received traditions. They listened to both and then went back to the Scriptures to evaluate the positions placed before them.

To do that, they had to be open to hearing new interpretations. They had to be willing to entertain new ideas. They also had to accept their personal responsibility to evaluate what they heard in light of what the Scriptures actually said. They took in Paul's teaching and then went about the process to see if his claims stacked up to God's revelation in the Scriptures.

It is one thing to claim that our doctrinal positions and religious traditions are Biblical. It is quite another to test them with an honest scrutiny of the Scriptures on which they should be based. The strength of our claims must match up with what God has revealed, not with what we want to believe or what we have simply heard over the course of our lives. If our positions do not match up with what God has revealed, our positions are meaningless. They become nothing more than cultural or social norms with a veneer of religious polish to them.

Paul did not stop in Berea, however, he went on to Athens. While the Bereans were occupied with searching the Scriptures to validate Paul's teaching, the Thessalonian Jews followed him to run him out of yet another town. In Athens, however, Paul found people with itching ears, ready to hear anything as long as it was new. This gave Paul a ready platform, but it did not give him the same kind of depth on which to build on the gospel message.

If the Thessalonians were unwilling to accept anything new, the Athenians merely wanted to hear new ideas for the sake of curiosity. They were unwilling to commit to a message, regardless of what it was or how solid it might be. They just wanted something new, something different, something to arouse their curiosity.

Athens displayed something far from the strictures of a closed fundamentalist perspective, but it was just as destructive and unhelpful. New thoughts, new ideas, new perspectives in themselves are not of any benefit. That is how we get a plethora of conspiracy theories, junk science, and baseless truth claims that do nothing more than tear down a society. It is how we engender a myriad of cults and false doctrines. Rather than being completely closed or completely open, we need that discerning spirit of the Bereans who tested what they heard, going back to a firm foundation upon which to base new responses to a changing world.

It is not enough to grasp onto an established faith tradition. God is too big for the restrictions of anyone's box. It is foolish to do away with any foundation of faith. God has been in the business of revealing and reconciling humanity for many generations. We just have to open our hearts and minds to growth, even as we hold fast to what God has revealed in Christ Jesus.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Bible on Homosexuality
The Bible is not arranged topically to address the issues that arise in our lives or in the consciousness of any culture or society. It is not a book we can easily run to in order to find neat answers to the concerns raised by people living far removed from the circumstances of the Ancient Near East of First Century Palestine. That is just not how it was designed.
Life's issues are generally much more complex than what we might dig from the Bible by quickly looking up a few words in a concordance or web search. Some themes are treated throughout the texts that compose the Bible. Others are hardly present at all. What one text may seem to say another might spin differently, challenging us to take a closer look at the first passage and the second, as well.
When it comes to a topic like homosexuality, we are dealing with a short list of passages that may or may not have anything to do with what we understand as homosexuality. To further complicate matters, …

Here is a list of legislative options I have come up with to help stem the tide of gun violence in the US. Pick 17 in honor of the #ParklandStudents. Choose 3. Let's start with 1, but let's do something.

Almighty Gun, we worship you.It is in you we place our trust and hope for our security.Where fifty-eight or more lie dead,We pass legislation for more of your presence.We hope you will protect us from our fears,Our fear of the "Other," the immigrant, the stranger, the colored ones.We fear our lives might be taken by those marketing terror.All the while, we are the ones in terror.We are the ones who instill, promote, and extend our own terror.We live in fear.We pack heat to make us feel stronger, more virulent, more protected.We return to the world of make-believe, in which we are the heroes standing up to the enemies all around us.We pray you will provide the energy and the aim we need.We pray you will protect us from our fears of unknown enemies.Then one of us takes a last stand, firing rounds from automatic weapons."No, the guns are not to blame!"If only there were more gun worshippers present to stop the hail of lead!If only there were one more gun to halt the a…

Raised by missionaries in Brazil, missions has been my whole life. São Paulo and Recife were where I grew up, spending half my life as a missionary or the child of missionaries.For 7 years I taught systematic theology at the seminary, coordinated & taught in the Program for Theological Ed. by Ext. at the Seminário Teológico Batista do RS.The Dept. of Modern Languages at Mississippi College honored me as Distinguished Alumnus of the year for 2014-2015.Several of my books are available at www.amazon.com & 400+ of my sermons are published at www.sermonsearch.com.Campbell Univ. Divinity School invited had me preach their Latino commencement address in 2016. Another speaking highlight was the 25th anniversary of the Seminário Teológico Batista do Rio Grande do Sul inaugural lecture.I am available for speaking engagements, having done revivals & guest lectures in English, Portuguese, and Spanish.