Abstract

We argue that EU law and the ethos of European integration, premised on inclusiveness and the taming of the state requires the Union to remain neutral in the context of the permutations of statehood at the national level leading to the emergence of new state entities in Europe. We show that the matter of permutations of statehood is not new or exceptional, unlike what is sometimes claimed, and demonstrate that the EU is not to blame for facilitating the viability of newly-emerging states in Europe, since this is one of the natural bi-products of the very nature of the Union. In this context intervening in national constitutional secession politics and making threats to prevent the newly-emerging states from joining the EU would not only be an ultra vires action for the EU to take. It would also be both counter-productive and deprived of any purpose, which leads us to conclude that EU law should be deployed as inventively as is necessary to ensure continued membership of the EU of the entities seceding from the current Member States.

Kochenov, Dimitry and van den Brink, Martijn, Secessions from EU Member States: The Imperative of Union's Neutrality (March 12, 2016). University of Groningen Faculty of Law Research Paper 2016-09; 1 European Papers, 2016, pp. 67–92.; University of Groningen Faculty of Law Research Paper 2016-09; Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper No. 2016/06; Europa Working Paper No 2016/04. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2746846 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2746846

SSRN Rankings

About SSRN

We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content.By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies. To learn more, visit our Cookies page.
This page was processed by aws-apollo5 in 0.187 seconds