Go to google and type in "topless beaches" and see the thousands of photos taken showing showing thousands of boobs on display some far away and the
owners of said boobs are unaware that their bits and pieces are on the interweb. Whats the problem ?

Originally posted by bigyin
Go to google and type in "topless beaches" and see the thousands of photos taken showing showing thousands of boobs on display some far away and the
owners of said boobs are unaware that their bits and pieces are on the interweb. Whats the problem ?

No problem on a public beach

...could even be blatently flaunting their assets

Big problem in a remote private property photo taken covertly from a mile away!!

He may be a photographer, but i doubt his remit calls for him to behave like a
voyeur/peeping tom?

Why do you keep using sexual terms for someone who took come captures? Like when you implied the photographer 'got off' on the photo? Again - the
photographer was doing his job. Presuming there's more to it is just foolishness.

As for the rest? Again - it's impossible for me to even begin to address your thought of mind that complies to and even applauds the reduction of
freedoms and privacy to incur 'safety'. Public or no. It's just too mind-boggling for me to even comprehend.

All that being said and done? Once again - the 'Royals' are fair game - just like anyone else. Until they want to give back peoples divine right
to privacy? They deserve none of their own. And really - lol - they're just boobies. Royal or not.

Originally posted by silo13
Again - the photographer was doing his job. Presuming there's more to it is just foolishness.

Thats a bit like having a locksmith who breaks into locks for a living, suddenly burgle your house, only to say he was "just doing his job.

It breaks the law when he breaks into your private house without consent. Same here, what he did was illegal and as they have already mentioned,
France take a dim view on this and the offense can bring you a couple of years inside.

On a slightly different angle, last night on Sky a former soldier who was discussing the story, spoke about the more serious side to this....the
security.

If as has been reported this was taken from about a kilometer away with a long range lens, what was to stop this being a sniper? Kate, if some people
have forgotten, like it or not is not just a celeb, she is the future queen of England. Quite the target for some organizations.

As the soldier said last night, thats an easy shot to make for a lot of people.

I wonder if they'll start reviewing security further out now when they stay anywhere? I know you can only do so much though.

Because I have a firm grasp and understanding of the English language of course I do.

Your quote:

SO what kind of scum/pervert/low life gets their 'kicks' in this way?

Your word choice(s) thorough the thread:

Peeping Tom is a character in the legend of Lady Godiva who watched Godiva riding naked.

Peeping Tom may also refer to: Peeping Tom, a nickname for a male voyeur

Voyeurism is the sexual interest in or practice of spying on people engaged in intimate behaviors, such as undressing, sexual activity, or
other actions usually considered to be of a private nature.

Now that you understand why your choice of words is misleading - The question you've failed not only to deflect but answer? Why do you feel the need
to foster perversity on this photographer who’s doing his job?

But if i'm entitled to my privacy so are they

Exactly. Take down those millions of cameras treating the populace as a while like criminals and they (the Royals) deserve their privacy too. One
thing we do agree on.

Originally posted by FlyersFan
If you go naked outside then people are going to look and take pictures. If you are living off your celebrity .. like Kate .. then you should know
better than to go outside naked. Seems like stupidity on her part.

Kate and her hubbie are no fools or stupid....They are well aware there is a reporter lurking somewhere with a giant telelens mounted on his camera.
To be sure he is there they can always rely on MI5 or 6 intel to know for sure it is "unsafe" to go outside naked.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.