Renewable EnergyDiscussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason; it has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus [Antaeus], who derives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic—and this we know it is, for certain—then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

In the course of 1888-1901 Nikola Tesla developed and tested a new way to generate electrical power from the medium. He described it first and most completely in his article "the Problem of Increasing Human Energy", but in later articles especially after 1930 he gave more clues. His Death Beam and Interplanetary Communication are based on the same principle. So once you understand the Magnifying Transmitter, you will also understand what he meant with these, and how they operate.
A number of years ago I thought I had found the key to the Magnifying Transmitter, and indeed it proved to be true. But to fully unlock its secret took another few years until about 1 year ago I knew the picture was complete, and ... it would certanly work.

Tesla called his Magnifying Transmitter the most magnificent electrical machine that he had knowledge of and I am sure that everyone will agree once they understand what it is and what it does.

I have been unable to talk about it in exchange for money to experiment with it. But the time is near that I will be free to talk about it.
The plan is to spread this knowledge as far and wide and as quickly as possible, in a 2 stage process.
The first stage is to put up a video on youtube showing the entire process, but explaning only 90% of it. Scientists will say that it won't work because they THINK they can fill in the missing 10%. So this video will not be seen as a threat. But someone familiar with Tesla's writings may eventually figure it out. Later as soon as I have an exposure to at least 10K people I will supply the full explanation.

For now this thread is to discuss ideas on how to create that exposure in the shortest possible time.
After the video has been posted the contents of that video can be discussed here.
Once I have the audience I want, all your answers will be questioned and all your questions answerred.

One of the most common myths is that he successfully transmitted power over 26 miles...

Go read some of Tesla's work, Matthew, before making an utter fool of yourself. Oh, I forgot, you're a comedian....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matthew Inman

Regarding Tesla's mental health, his cheese had pretty much slid off his cracker by the time he was 30 years old. In 1905 when Einstein's theory of relativity was gaining momentum, Tesla was basically clinically insane by then.

30 years old? That was in 1886. He gave some very well received lectures between 1891-93, and built the first radio controlled boat in 1898. Quite impressive for someone "without cheese on his cracker".
Now read this.
He reserves the right to call you all kind of names and send you pictures of horse penises.
Well Matthew, I don't know what kind of obsession you have with horses, but get a few of those penises and put them in a vase on your desk to remind you of what you really are.

When the truth about Tesla's work is out we'll see just whose cracker's lost its cheese.

Thanks Aaron! That would be a very good start.
Allow me to stick with my plan, 10,000 views first, then full disclosure.
But with your 95,000 subscribers that could be arranged in a very short time.
(add to that 12,000 members of the Nikola Tesla Society and it can be done in minutes, seconds perhaps)

Ernst
Seeing Tesla's vision come to pass in our lifetime would be
like a dream come true.

Tesla
[Again because its soo good]
Quote
Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason; it has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus [Antaeus], who derives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic—and this we know it is, for certain—then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

respectfully

Chet K
PS
as you may recall I made some contacts and met some very nice folks at the new Tesla Museum site At Wardenclyffe
Would a demonstration at Wardenclyffe be considered?

Ernst, You have done an amazing job of building and research. It must be very difficult to hold what you have without disclosing it all right away. But I think your plan for disclosure is a very bad plan. Sorry but I still believe there are powers out there that will do anything to stop such info from getting out and IMO you've just painted a big target on yourself. I've always said the best way to release a major breakthrough is to do it all at once as far and wide as possible and to do it anonymously but with an encrypted bit of info enclosed with your release which once it is well established that your info is valid and in the hands of thousands you will share the decryption password disclosing you as the inventor / finder of this information. Does that sound too 'cloak and dagger' ? I can understand if it does but are you willing to bet your life that the trillion dollar energy industry might not do whatever it takes to stop a major breakthrough which has the potential to destroy their business from going public?

__________________
There is no important work, there are only a series of moments to demonstrate your mastery and impeccability. Quote from Almine

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 37 (10 members and 27 guests) 27 guests? I'd suggest you request Aaron to close this thread and wait until you are ready for full disclosure. Or delete your first post and I'll delete mine too. Just a friendly suggestion - hope I'm wrong about the PTB who want to stop any such info from getting out but there seems to be a long history of such suppression.

__________________
There is no important work, there are only a series of moments to demonstrate your mastery and impeccability. Quote from Almine

Hi Ernst ,
I for one would love to hear what you have to say . Have read much of Dr. Tesla's work and built some of his devices . But never the Magnifing transmitter. Am very interested to hear your presentation . Though I am only one , It's one closer to the ten thousand . As for the detractors claiming Tesla had lost his mind , well you and I both have read his lectures and presentation . I can for one only say he was a brilliant scientist . One need only try what he proposed in experiments that he laid out in quite good detail . For then you can see for yourself , to many are chair researchers and physicists doing thought experiments. I make no claims of being an expert , only an experimenter with some experience in high voltage system . And designing my own equipment .
So Ernst I await your disclosure and wish the very best to you .

@ ewizzard,
I have talked to many people and scientists and outside of the world of free-energy believers I found there is no one who takes this seriously. Maybe 20-50 years ago you would have been right, but today, Tesla and his work is being laughed at.
We all know 'better' now, come on!, didn't he say "ether"! ha ha ha...
I have not found one shred of faith. Only fear of reputation damage.

I am not the first one with a theory about Tesla's "secret", and all those before me have proven established science right. It has been 116 years, if there was something there surely someone would have found it!

I believe this 2 step approach is the right way and with Aaron's contacts there will be little difference between 1 step or 2 steps.
Have faith! (famous last words)
BTW. the video and the document containing the complete disclosure are not only in my hands. If anything were to happen to me, it would only speed up the disclosure process.

@RAMSET,
In the early stages of the disclosure I will certainly not come to the US of A.
Later perhaps, when you can read about this in the papers and hear it on tv.
A demo - in Tesla's way - would require huge equipment, we are talking about millions of volts. This can not be set up in a few days or even weeks.
But I have seen some very promising effects at lower voltages and with smaller equipment. I think with proper power electronics the effects can be replicated at voltages around 100KV. or even slightly below that The problem is that power transistors are not compatible with me. I have not tried tubes, because their cathode heating uses too much power.
I think (90% sure) it can be done and it would be great if someone here would provide this proof.
I'll explain how to do it, but someone else with MOSFET or IGBT compatibility will have to try.

I think most Tesla & Tesla apparatus enthusiasts would be very interested in learning about your disclosure or claims regarding the Tesla Magnifying Transmitter.

I my opinion, rather than wait for 10,000 views on this forum, where by that stage the momentum of the interest would decrease somewhat. Simply decide if you’re going to disclose or not. If so, then do so when the time is right for you…

When it is, use all available the resources that originate from this forum which actually spread out around the planet like octopus tentacles… (I think we would all be amazed as to how far they actually spread).

Of course once you release your information there will be critics (and supporters) of one kind or another. Critics could be silenced (or their volume level reduced) by other experimenters also being able to demonstrate the magnifying principle that you show or claim with their own apparatus...

Good luck

__________________
"Doesn't matter how many times you kick the coyote in the head, it's still gonna eat chickens". - EPD

You are not the only one with that view. I think 10K views (I was thinking of Youtube) is not too much to ask.
I want to make certain that I have an audience and that there is a willingness to help spread the word.
If explained in this manner, it should be met with understanding rather than reduced interest.

I NEED a participating audience in this. Do this for me and I'll show what science has overlooked.

If a small delay would cause a decrease in interest, I am sure it will pick up again later.
Remember, there is absolutely no confidence, and they are right for if the shoe was on the other foot, I wouldn't believe me neither.
So give me a stage, give me an audience and then either enjoy seeing me making a fool of myself or see some jaws drop.

Tesla claims to have found a new source for electrical energy and there are many people with different theories. So far none of these can provide power at industrial levels.
Tesla says he had worked for the future, but as far as most people see he has taken his greatest discoveries with him to his grave.
So there must be something in his work that we have overlooked, namely the key to his discoveries.
This is what I have found and what I want to share with everyone.
Once you know this you will read his work new eyes and you will understand what he is saying. You will understand how you can connect our machines to the wheelwork of nature, you will understand what a Magnifying Transmitter is, you will understand how the Death Ray works, his self acting engine etc. and you will read all of this in his own words, not mine.
The video will show the overall process of the TMT and how it connects to the wheelwork of nature (but the full explanation and the key is in a 65 page document).
I wanted to make a second video about this key, but what I have got so far is horrible. I may leave that to other more creative minds.

It is much like Bill Beaty says at the bottom of his list of lost discoveries; one discovery from which all the above sprout.

Does that answer your question?

Ernst.

BTW. it also gives a clue about his theory of gravity, but I do not see a full explanation. I still have some questions about his flivver.

The key of it all is just one small fact which is indeed easily overlooked, but Tesla mentions it very specifically. (and still it is overlooked )
Knowing this key will help you decipher the TMT, bus as I said before it still took me a few years. That is why I will provide both this key and a full explanation of the TMT.
These two together will change the landscape of electrical science permanently.

Tesla claims to have found a new source for electrical energy and there are many people with different theories. So far none of these can provide power at industrial levels.
Tesla says he had worked for the future, but as far as most people see he has taken his greatest discoveries with him to his grave.
So there must be something in his work that we have overlooked, namely the key to his discoveries.
This is what I have found and what I want to share with everyone.
Once you know this you will read his work new eyes and you will understand what he is saying. You will understand how you can connect our machines to the wheelwork of nature, you will understand what a Magnifying Transmitter is, you will understand how the Death Ray works, his self acting engine etc. and you will read all of this in his own words, not mine.
The video will show the overall process of the TMT and how it connects to the wheelwork of nature (but the full explanation and the key is in a 65 page document).
I wanted to make a second video about this key, but what I have got so far is horrible. I may leave that to other more creative minds.

It is much like Bill Beaty says at the bottom of his list of lost discoveries; one discovery from which all the above sprout.

Does that answer your question?

Ernst.

BTW. it also gives a clue about his theory of gravity, but I do not see a full explanation. I still have some questions about his flivver.

Ernst,

Honestly, I do wish you the best on your disclosure, no matter of our discrepancies in the past...I actually don't store hard feelings about any arguments on this Forum, no matter what...

But I have a question...on your statement from above:

Quote:

...you will understand how the Death Ray works...

In order to understand how the TMT works or how to connect our machines to the wheelwork of nature...

Is it necessary to disclose the Death Ray details on how it works?

I am pretty sure you understand that doing so will set you automatically in a red target list that Any Country National Security Dept could use against you?

And it could possibly spread into a Global Security Issue...no matter of your location?

Anyways, you are all grown up...and am pretty sure you know what you are doing...

On a last opinion about your disclosure...hurry up and do it as fast as you could...because once I do my full disclosure, based on Ken Wheeler's Theory...there would not be any need to transmit Electricity anywhere...just because energy could be created (sorry, generated...) anywhere on this Planet, very easy, very lightweight, very cheap...and very compact. So, anywhere there could be a Generator...absolutely anywhere...

Good Luck

Ufopolitics

EDIT: I highly recommend a book..."Ghost Dancer" by John Case...is fiction...but very interesting, and it is about the Death Ray and Tesla's work...

__________________
Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

In an article, "Man's Greatest Achievement",
Tesla outlined his Dynamic Theory of Gravity in poetic form :

* That the luminiferous ether fills all space

* That the ether is acted upon by the life-giving creative force

* That the ether is thrown into "infinitesimal whirls" ("micro helices") at near the speed of light, becoming ponderable matter

* That when the force subsides and motion ceases, matter reverts to the ether (a form of "atomic decay")

That man can harness these processes, to:

-Precipitate matter from the ether
-Create whatever he wants with the matter and energy derived
-Alter the earth's size
-Control earth's seasons (weather control)
-Guide earth's path through the Universe, like a space ship
-Cause the collisions of planets to produce new suns and stars, heat, and light
-Originate and develop life in infinite forms

In an article, "Man's Greatest Achievement",
Tesla outlined his Dynamic Theory of Gravity in poetic form :

* That the luminiferous ether fills all space

* That the ether is acted upon by the life-giving creative force

* That the ether is thrown into "infinitesimal whirls" ("micro helices") at near the speed of light, becoming ponderable matter

* That when the force subsides and motion ceases, matter reverts to the ether (a form of "atomic decay")

That man can harness these processes, to:

-Precipitate matter from the ether
-Create whatever he wants with the matter and energy derived
-Alter the earth's size
-Control earth's seasons (weather control)
-Guide earth's path through the Universe, like a space ship
-Cause the collisions of planets to produce new suns and stars, heat, and light
-Originate and develop life in infinite forms

The words you quote do not explain much. For example: How do you derive Newtons equations from that?
The page you refer to is better, but although it looks good at first glance, it is impossible to derive a working model from it. It is full with contradictions and he mentions a few "facts" that I find hard to swallow. (the Earth's rapidly changing potential???)
If gravity was produced by an ether wind blowing down on Earth from all directions, then where does all this wind go? As the Earth is moving through this ether at very high speed, then at one side (front) of the Earth gravity should be stronger than on the other (back).
He does not make clear distinction between his own words and Tesla's, nor does he always mention sources. That is a pity because I have read most of these statements before and I would like to know is it because I have read William Lyne before or is it because these are quotes of Tesla?
With Tesla you always should read the exact quote, not some interpretation, because that interpretation is often biased, and as Tesla may have put a second (hidden) meaning in it, that would certainly get damaged by the interpretation.
His remarks on ether are good. I just added this to my blog, which you will also find in my 65 page Tesla Code document.
It is essential to understand Tesla's view on this.

The main coil in my lab produces about 1.2 MV in short pulses.
Is that inefficient?
No, not at all. You can produce this voltage with smaller coils in CW mode, but not in these very short pulses.
Then why short pulses?
Because I want to rule out many side effects, and also to see if I could find the 11.77 Hz Earth frequency (which I did). Also I can not get enough power from the grid to run in CW-mode. This last issue will be settled soon when I get my 100 KVA generator.
Then in CW mode I will get many MV's.
Do I HAVE a machine to derive power from the wheelwork of nature?
I have, but due to measurement complications I have no definite proof (yet).
Then what is this thread about?
This thread is about the KEY to understanding Tesla's work. There are so many theories and everyone is convinced that his theory is the right one. There are so many "secret of Tesla"-s going round! What I will show you is that the secret was staring you in the face all this time. I will show you what you have missed in Tesla's work and with that little extra knowledge you will understand every detail of it.
You will understand what Tesla was doing between 1888 and 1901 and why.
You will understand how the magnifying transmitter, and the self-acting engine, and his new method for producing iron, and his discovery about a new energy source that he mentions in the 1930's are all the same thing and you will read ALL of this in Tesla's own words.
So it is not MY theory or just another theory, I will show you Tesla's theory in a way that will end all uncertainty.
There are a number of experiments anyone can do to proof that it will work.
But then, nature shows every day, every hour that it does work, so why would you need to prove anything?

As I have said before, to rebuild Wardenclyffe is (at this time) beyond any of us mainly for financial reasons. I hope this will change, but that would require some extremely wealthy person(s) to step forward. But, if my interpretation of phenomena that I have seen is correct, then it should be possible to tap this energy source with equipment that is within our reach. Due to my MOSFET/IGBT incompatibility I have not yet explored this option but yesterday I found a way around this, so I am going to explore this too.
That will take a month or so, but you may get there first....

What did I tell you in my last post here?
That according to Tesla electrical effects are caused by a gaseous medium.
Is that my theory?
Nope, plenty of quotes there.
Congratulations, you are now holding the key. You just don't know it yet.
If electricity is (like) a gas, then what law should apply?

Now read "the problem of increasing human energy" starting at "a departure from known methods". (page 312 in my copy)

Ring a bell?

The video will be up in a few days, I must give some time to my assassin(s)
The video will show the entire process of the TMT but the explanation is incomplete.
(but you now have the key)

Abstract. - ‘Ether-drift’ experiments have played a crucial role for the origin of relativity. Though, a recent re-analysis shows that those original measurements where light was still propagating in gaseous systems, differently from the modern experiments in vacuum and in solid dielectrics, indicate a small universal anisotropy which is naturally interpreted in terms of a nonlocal thermal gradient. We argue that this could possibly be the effect, on weakly bound gaseous matter, of the temperature gradient due to the Earth’s motion within the Cosmic Background Radiation (CBR). Therefore, a check with modern laser interferometers is needed to reproduce the conditions of those early measurements with today’s much greater accuracy. We emphasize that an unambiguous confirmation of our interpretation would have far reaching consequences. For instance, it would also imply that all physical systems on the moving Earth are exposed to a tiny energy flow, an effect that, in principle, could induce forms of self-organization in matter.

Thanks for the link, Al. I will need some time to digest that paper, but it looks good.
It seems (at first glance) as a rather feeble effect, that they describe. Not enough to satisfy our energy needs. Some things are mentioned there that may require a different explanation, different from the currently accepted view.
- CBR is supposed to be the remains of the Big Bang. There never was a Big Bang because such a thing is entirely impossible and is even conflicting with other accepted theories. So to find remains of something that did never happen does not fall in the category "logical reasoning". The CBR is what Tesla calls secondary cosmic rays a very simple and logical explanation that should win the Occam's Razor prize anytime.
- The other illusion that we should awaken from is that of Relativity. Einsteins dream should end. Here is how. The theory of R is based on the pinciple of R that says there is no experiment that can differentiate between a moving and a stationary frame of reference.
Well... there is actually.
If I put two equal charges on the table they repel and want to move in opposite directions.
If those two charges were to move in the same direction with the same velocity they would produce magnetic fields. If the velocity is high enough these charges will attract and thus show a tendency to move towards eachother. Now some may argue that an electric field translates to a magnetic one through the Lorentz transformation. Fair enough, then show me a magnet where none of the field lines pass through the magnet as in the case of the moving charge.Until someone shows me such a magnet we can suspend this theory of relativity.
But we're drifting off topic....

When I went to high school I was told there were a number of people who had derived some gas-law. These were then all combined into the "Universal Gas Law". When I google for universal gas law it seems to have disappeared, it is called "Ideal Gas Law" now;
Pressure times volume equals number of molecules times the Boltzman constant times temperature. In electricity we could compare voltage to pressure, capacitance to volume and charge as a measure of quantity. Now where is the temperature?
The thing is, it is so constant that we did not realize it was actually there. Thermal conductance in the case of electricity happens so fast that it is difficult to notice the role it plays, unless of course you can create very abrupt changes. In transients there are many effects that are still not fully understood. As is in lightning, Natures prime example of vast transients.
If you read the Feynman lectures on atmospheric electricity, you will read:
- cosmic rays charge the ionosphere with a positive charge
- through our atmosphere the Earth "leaks" 1800 A (negative charges) to the ionosphere
- lightning replenishes this loss of negative charge
Sounds good? There is a small problem though, because lightning takes place in the lower 10 Km's and the ionosphere is at 70 Km's. So what brings the negative charge from the ionosphere against the electric field down to the thunderclouds?
If Feynman is right, then the Earth loses 1.8 KC every second which should result in a rise of the Earth's potential of about 1.2MV per hour.
This is clearly not the case.

According to PV=NkT increasing the temperature has the same effect as adding charge. But I am not talking about the temperature that one feels, I am talking about the average kinetic energy of the electrons. If there are more electrons, the pressure rises, but if those electrons were to move more violently the pressure rises also. It is a very obvious concept.
Can we measure this temperature?
Not directly, but we can make changes visible with an IR-thermometer.
Measure the temperature of a Tesla coil with an IR-themometer and you will see a rise when it is switched on (electricity compresses) and a drop when switching it off.
And no, it is not RF-induced malfunction, because the effects are very consistent.

Primary Cosmic Rays (PCR) are very penetrative and most will pass through miles of matter unhindered. So an antenna to receive this energy needs to be huge in order to absorb an appreciable amount of energy. So we use the largest antenne that we have access to; the Earth. The Earth is negative with respect to the ionosphere, but not because a surplus of electrons, it is because the electrons are moving more violently because of the PCR, in other words; their temperature is higher. So the Earth-Ionosphere potential is not caused by a difference in charge, but in charge-temperature which has the same outside effect.
The 1800A we see flowing through our atmosphere is likewise not a movement of charge but a thermal conductance that we interpret in the same way. The Earth does not lose charge, that would be ridiculous. The cosmic rays do not charge the ionosphere, they heat the Earth. And they heat the Earth to a temperature determined by the intensity of the rays and the properties of the Earth (think of size, mass etc). Therefore this heat is a virtually unlimited source of energy.

Again, the explanation in the video is incomplete, but together with what I have written here and in the document (which are >90% Tesla's own words) I hope the idea will get across.

Please spread the word far & wide.

Any questions, ask them here. (after you have read the document, which I agree may not be very readable due to the fact that it was a working document in which I collected all thoughts and later removed those that did not match.)
If someone with artistic inspirations wants to make a better/clearer/more complete video, feel free to do so, but please make a reference to me. There are more than 20K hours of work in there.