https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/26/white-nationalists-antifa-university-violence-305014
`After a year marked by campus confrontations between white nationalists and anti-fascist extremists, university administrators are preparing for a combative and potentially violent 2018 by beefing up security and examining the boundaries of their own commitment to free speech.`

`Administrators at many campuses told POLITICO that they are struggling to balance their commitment to free speech — which has been challenged by alt-right supporters of President Donald Trump — with campus safety, as white nationalists and left-wing provocateurs vow to continue the types of confrontations that have led to violence in Berkeley, California, and Charlottesville, Virginia.`

I like the prospect of making anti-White universities uninhabitable due to free speech battles.

The goal isn't to outnumber the enemy, it's to overpower them. We're going to need more than we currently have to overpower them, but with those that we have and gain, a main objective must be self improvement.

And as far as our recruitment of awakened radicals, who simply need to be molded into activists and plugged into a community, there's no telling how many folks with our beliefs are out there, so we've no reason to stop looking, or at least leaving the door open to those who have what it takes.

Our founding fathers were woke. They enslaved niggers, didnt allow women to vote, and manifested our destiny. To me it seems like all we would have to do is put men with our morality back into the seats of power they built. We may have to take our power forcefully, but I think the original system worked well.

Fascism in America would likely, eventually, take the form of a highly restrictive Republic. Outside of that, the differences would likely be State protectionism in the economy, and the whole matter of technology being utilized to better increase efficiency. Also, monopolies weren't as big of an issue before industrialization, so hightened caution with those.

Capitalism as we know it, as the Founding Fathers did not live to see it, will be a thing of the past. Materialism will be out the proverbial window. A lot of the issues of creeping modernity were not an issue when the Founders drew up their plans, so it's a bit hard to point out specifics.

I think a system somewhat similar to the Roman Republic, where the social classes were divided up and given different values of a vote should be implemented, but instead of it being based on income, it would be based on a scale of how much that person has given to society.

Essentially, a man with a child has a more valuable vote than one without, and one with three more than both of them, and it goes up if he owns land, or has served in the military, or is a public servant of some kind. There would be checks and balances written in, so a judge may be able to veto someone's vote if it's clear they're abusing the system.

I think basing it purely on military service may be a bit bad in the long term, as you'd have a nation reliant purely on its military industrial complex, adding in family and land owning bits would help to balance it out. Small business owners and farmers would probably get more of a vote than bankers and drug peddlers, too. Not like I've got the whole system outlined point-by-point, but having it in a certain way, and making it very difficult to amend would be a good step in the right direction.

Dedicating a life to the greater good can come in many forms. A healthy domestic life is one such form. Someone who builds a family, and benefits his community can be just as much a force against the nation's domestic enemies as a soldier can be against its foreign ones.

But the farmer and father should be willing to raise a rifle for his folk, as has always been the case for Germanic people. The military and family caste shouldn't be exclusive, if anything the father has all the more reason to fight, and a father that refuses to fight for his children is twice the corward. There's also the idea of early life service and then having a family after, as well.

But, as said, there is non military service, but tbh I firmly distrust any politician who hasn't served, because only one who has served truly knows what they're asking men to do, and truly gains the respect of his men. Look how German soldiers fought for Hitler compared to how Americans fight for civilian presidents.

I'm a believer in the militia style martial culture, but ideally there are other options present for advancement in society, so that there is a functioning system of social mobility during peace time. We're on the same page here.

In many cases on the frontier, military training wasn't needed because all the men already had experience with rifles and fighting to defend their families. Finding a way to recreate that element of the American Spirit should be a goal.

I think the main point is that refusing to answer the call is wrong, and an expanded and updated reserve system would be built, but if there's no open conflict, choosing not to for a selection of valid reasons is not something that makes a man irredeemable.

Essentially points out that the SPLC's tactic of abusing the legal system to siphon millions away from wrongthinking organizations is effective, but there's a gap, a large one, between those Jewish laywers and the Communist foot soldiers that are needed to "finish the job".

We are one month away from FashRuck beta 27 Ian 2018. Recommend cold start and finish to your showers and getting some miles in to break in your feet. I'm going to make sure this event will be one of the hardest things most of you have ever done

You can let them know about us, but flat out asking for promotion isn't the right way to go about it. We do a lot of networking with the TRS folks, so as we get better at growth and organizing, more of them will take notice, and that will come out in the mentions of their shows, no doubt. Same goes with Anglin and the DS.