Ashes 2013: Ruthless England sparked by Ian Bell's dominance

That rollercoaster
first Test
apart, this has been an Ashes series lit up by irregular explosions of great drama rather than relentless theatre:
Friday afternoon at Lord's,
the final lunchtime in Manchester,
Sunday evenings in Durham
and south London. In that, it reflects the intrinsic nature of much Test cricket. The delights, when they come, are all the more dramatic for the necessary grind on either side.

In Ian Bell we have seen an England batsman who dominated with delicate touch throughout. Australia paceman Ryan Harris threatened in every one of the four Tests he played after missing the first.

Test Match Special analysis

Jonathan AgnewBBC cricket correspondent

"This was always going to happen. Don't blame the umpires or the players... blame the ICC. It's an absolute disgrace. An absolute shambles. The final day of the Ashes has ended in a farce. Let's hope that finally those people in Dubai who run the game realise what a mess this is. It's NOT the umpires' fault."

The other outstanding performers, much like the overall narrative, have sparkled more sporadically - England's James Anderson with 10 wickets in Nottingham and then just seven more across the next six innings; Australia captain Michael Clarke, that brilliant 187 at Old Trafford but just 194 more runs at an average of 21 in his other nine knocks; Stuart Broad, 11 match-winning wickets for the hosts in the fourth Test after taking just nine in the previous 11 Ashes innings at 60 apiece.

While it ends with a scoreline that speaks of dominance, it has also frequently felt much tighter than a 3-0 should. Only 14 runs separated the two sides in Nottingham. The weather aided England when they lost both toss and control at Old Trafford and The Oval.

England emerged triumphant not because they turned out to be the superior team at all times in all departments, but because they were capable, in those decisive sessions, of reducing Australia to rapid rubble.

There is a great skill in turning the taking of one or two wickets into a full-scale rout, as Alastair Cook's men did in the critical passages of play. It takes a masterful bowler in relentless mood, a communal belief borne of previous triumphs, a ruthlessness when chances are offered.

Australia, when they worked their own openings, could only graze chins rather than deliver knockout punches.

Four times they took first-innings leads. Not once did they allow the opposition to pass 400. Despite that, they came within a laughable bad-light ruling of losing four in five.

Even in each of England's wins, they had a crowbar in the safe: at Trent Bridge, with the hosts four down in their second innings and just 66 runs ahead; on the first morning at Lord's, with England teetering at 23-3; at Durham, when England lost their third second-innings wicket with the lead at just 17.

Bell's third vital century of the series set up England's win at Durham and confirmed his metamorphosis

On each occasion it was Bell who first rode the punches and then inexorably forced the tourists onto the ropes. No more can he be derided for that perceived inability to score big runs under immense pressure.

He made 109 in six-and-a-half intent hours on that low, slow Trent Bridge track, the same score in five hours at Lord's and 113 off 210 endlessly patient balls to set up the win at Chester-le-Street.

In 16 innings at home to Australia before this series he averaged 21. He ended the summer with 562 at 62, equalling the English record for a five-match home Ashes set by Denis Compton in 1948. Transformations have seldom been so spectacular or significant.

The tourists had a pace attack that could sometimes match England's. Where they were crucially outgunned was when the ball turned, as if often did on pitches made to exploit that predicted discrepancy.

As England opened up a decisive 2-0 lead in the first two Tests, off-spinner Graeme Swann took 13 scalps. His opposite number, teenage debutant Ashton Agar, managed just two despite his heroics with bat in hand at the start of it all. By the time Nathan Lyon had been recalled to narrow the margins, the damage had been done.

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Ashes 2013: TMS pundits give their verdict on the series

Swann would finish with 26 wickets, the most for England in an Ashes series since Ian Botham's 31 in 1985. Only Jim Laker among English spinners has taken more in an Ashes summer.

Bell apart, England's top order did not accumulate as they had in the preceding Ashes series, frequently shackled by good plans well set. Neither did an Australian line-up that only began to settle once the series was already lost.

It led some to bemoan the quality of the action on offer. This has neither the exceptional combatants of 2005 nor the close-matched drama of 2009, went the argument. Will this series therefore be remembered as fondly as the last two English Ashes wins on home soil?

To which context is everything. The circumstances that surrounded
the series of 2005,
as well as the way it was won, can never again be matched. England were not coming into these Ashes off 16 years of humiliating defeat; Australia did not arrive loaded with all-time greats. To compare any subsequent series to those extraordinary two months is to invite disappointment.

Even in
2009,
England began as subordinates, whitewashed in the preceding series, dismissed for 51 by the West Indies a few months earlier, the leadership team of captain Andrew Strauss and coach Andy Flower new to the job and still trying to build fresh foundations from the wreckage of the
Kevin Pietersen-Peter Moores
regime.

Top scorers and wicket-takers

Leading run-scorers

562
Ian Bell (Eng) - average 62.44

418
Shane Watson (Aus) - average 41.80

388
Kevin Pietersen (Eng) - average 38.80

381
Michael Clarke (Aus) - average 47.62

367
Chris Rogers (Aus) - average 40.77

Leading wicket-takers

26
Graeme Swann (Eng) - average 29.03

24
Ryan Harris (Aus) - average 19.58

22
Stuart Broad (Eng) - average 27.45

22
James Anderson (Eng) - average 29.59

17
Peter Siddle (Aus) - average 31.58

Both then and four years earlier, overall victory was not assured until the final few hours of the last Test. In the comfort of this summer's margins - the urn secured with two matches still to come, the series won after one more - such cliffhanging ecstasies were lost.

It should not matter. England have now won three Ashes series in succession. Australia have failed to win a single Test in one for the first time in 36 years. In Cook's first 12 months of captaincy, he has won three series in four and not lost a Test in 12.

Not since David Gower's defining summer in 1985 have England won three Tests in a home Ashes series; after years of Antipodean ascendency, they have now levelled the overall Ashes balance at 31 series wins apiece.

These are reasons for praise and celebration. Whether such happy numbers will lead to similarly sunny times ahead will take longer to divine.

That Oval triumph in September 2005 will remain unmatched for its national impact and elation, yet it was a peak for that team that would not be scaled again. The XI that had taken the series lead at Trent Bridge would never play together again; a few months later, the survivors would lose in Pakistan and begin the slow slide that ended with capitulation in their next Ashes engagement.

August 2009 went the other way, signalling the birth of a new team under Flower and Strauss, the Oval marking Jonathan Trott's debut and the cricketing coming of age of Swann and Stuart Broad.

Over the next two years they would go unbeaten in series home and away, secure an unprecedented three innings victories in the Ashes down under, whitewash India at home and stand, albeit briefly, on top of the world.

This vintage of 2013 is somewhere in between, the hard core of 2009 yet to be fully buttressed by new additions and with cracks in the facade rather than any fatal fissures.

They were better than Australia this summer when it mattered most, and they deserved to come out on top. The winter ahead may prove both tighter and more testing.

Comments

I think the point of both those stories is to confess his own cowardice and raise a laugh. You'll find the same frankness in Tufnell's autobiography.

Not sure what it says about either as people. You may think you're big and hard, but you're not a 1980s tailender without protective gear or batting talent and technique facing some of the fastest, most brutal bowling ever seen.

all you need to know about Jonathan Agnew in two short stories:1. Hid in a cupboard (yes, you read it right, a grown man HID IN A CUPBOARD) rather than come out and face a notoriously fast bowler as night watchman.2. Gave HIMSELF out when there was clearly no edge, rather than face another bouncer against a notoriously fast bowler.

I would have thought so too, but in actual fact it does. I've recently played with a white ball for the first time EVER in my cricketing life, and trust me it moves differently. Also, I'm only facing snail-like pace and mediocre spin@135 - I totally agree, Agnew is the very model of the type of Englishman who is happy to lose, as long as everyone has a slice of cake and a pat on the back

Jonathan Agnew really does need to be careful - his now obvious smear campaign against the England team is ridiculous and instead of offering a neutral coverage of events - he's bordering on bile. I don't want my licence money wasted on paying a man who is juts going to rant and disassemble a WINNING team. It would just suit JA's plucky middle nature to have a team of losers again. Stop this BBC.

If trott and cook had batted more aggressively they would have won in plenty of time but in the first ten overs they played too safeI think the Aussies were very good to make a game of the last afternoon they didn't have to

Bell batted beautifully and it may seem crazy to give a criticism,,but,,,,Graham Gooch is big on stressing batsman have to make "Daddy Hundrads" (150 +). It's the one thing Bell does not do,,it's usually all under 115 or there abouts,,,just a point that to be great he has to push on from those scores,,

The problem for Aus is we won this 3-0 (and could have won 4-0) and, Bell aside, our top seven were all out of nick! If just one or two others had had good series Botham might have been right with his 5-0...

Aus's problem is Eng are unlikely to bat as bad as this collectively again, so Aus need to improve just to stand still...

#117 Daniel Ah, so that is why the last day of The Oval test match was sold out last December. Because there is no interest in test cricket any longer. I have no problem with T20 cricket, it can be quite good to watch for a while. But the 5 day game is & always will be the true test of players skills.

116.. given that both sides play 4 bowlers... you would expect the top 6 wicket takers to involve 3 of each side.. simple sums okay? Run rate - this is test match cricket, Australia's problem is that all the batsmen try and score quickly but get out quickly too...

Is it not worrying that our top order barely made 50's between them but still Australia were drubbed 3 - 0.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.