You read it here first. In 2013, my article “The Ruling Stones” pointed out that England had a new patron saint: Stephen Lawrence, the Black teenager murdered by a White gang in 1993. What I said five years ago has now become an official reality. The British prime minister Theresa May has announced an annual “Stephen Lawrence Day” on 22nd April, just before St George’s Day on 23rd April. The shabbos shiksa May was indulging in conspicuous minority worship, trying to overcome the damage done to her cuckservative government by the so-called “Windrush scandal.”

What’s up with the Brits?

However, it’s plain that Stephen Lawrence Day has been deliberately placed in the calendar as an attack on White Englishness. St George was England’s old patron saint and 23rd April is also the traditional birthday of William Shakespeare, the archetypal English genius. John Derbyshire put it like this at VDare: “No more of that white supremacist nonsense! The 23rd now dwells in the shadow of the 22nd, Stephen Lawrence Day.”

Derbyshire went on to express his usual bemusement at the state of his motherland: “What on earth is the matter with the Brits, that they have elevated this one regrettable but insignificant killing into a great holy martyrdom?” As I explained in “The Ruling Stones,” it wasn’t the Brits. Rather, it was a small but highly energetic minority that is hostile to the Brits. The guiding intellect behind the martyr-cult of St Stephen Lawrence has been an SJW called Dr Richard Stone, whose own website describes him as “a leading expert in social cohesion, anti-racism, and Islamophopia” and “a regular speaker around Europe at conferences on these topics.” Dr Stone is a part of an anti-White, pro-minority network that wields power at the highest levels of government not just in Britain but right across Europe.

From Alif-Aleph to Nisa-Nashim

Would John Derbyshire be surprised to learn that Dr Stone is Jewish and once served as the “President of the Jewish Council for Racial Equality”? Would he be surprised that Dr Stone’s “work bringing together British Jews and Muslims includes being a founding trustee of the Maimonides Foundation … and of Alif-Aleph UK”? I doubt that Derbyshire would be surprised. I also doubt that he would need telling that alif and aleph are the first letters of the Arabic and Hebrew alphabets. However, he might not know what “Nisa-Nashim” means in this article:

Jewish and Muslim women pledge to work together to combat hate

The largest conference gathering of Muslims and Jews in Europe has seen women from both faiths vow to work together to combat hate. More than 200 women took part in the Change Makers event on Sunday organised by Nisa-Nashim, Britain’s Jewish-Muslim women’s network, with sessions on topics ranging from the Middle East to self-defence. They bonded over food, poetry and yoga, and at one stage an afternoon prayer service was held side-by-side, with Muslim participants kneeling as Jewish women davened mincha [prayed] across the room.

Attendees at the central London conference travelled from towns and cities including Manchester, Leeds, Luton, Exeter, Peterborough and across London. A panel session included Helen Pankhurst, the activist and author who is the great-granddaughter of Emmeline Pankhurst; Gabby Edlin of the Bloody Good Period charity; Farzana Baduel, chief executive of PR firm Curzon; and Pinky Lilani, founder of the Women of the Future group. The debate was chaired by Nomia Iqbal from the BBC’s Asian Network.

Opening the event, Nisa-Nashim co-founder Laura Marks said: “Antisemitic hate incidents have reached a record level in the UK. Anti-Muslim hate crime has increased, both here and abroad. But what we are focussing on is the need to stick together — and genuinely support each other — no ifs, no buts, no what abouts, just friendship and support.” … (Jewish and Muslim women pledge to work together to combat hate, The Jewish Chronicle, 24th April 2018)

“Jewish and Muslim women unite against hate”

Laura Marks doesn’t mention that “Antisemitic hate incidents” have risen because of mass immigration by Muslims. As Mehdi Hasan said in the New Statesmanback in 2013: “… anti-Semitism isn’t just tolerated in some sections of the British Muslim community; it’s routine and commonplace.” Laura Marks and her soul-sisters have to pretend otherwise, or they would undermine the anti-White and anti-Christian aims of “Nisa-Nashim, Britain’s Jewish-Muslim women’s network.”

And what what does Nisa-Nashim mean? Well, nisa is Arabic for “women” and nashim is Hebrew for “women.” Arabic and Hebrew are closely related languages, just as, for Jews like Richard Stone and Laura Marks, Muslims and Jews are closely related groups. In the words of one of Dr Stone’s many newspaper articles: “British Jews and Muslims are natural allies.” Against whom? Against the White and historically Christian majority, of course. Like many other Jews based in Britain, Dr Richard Stone has devoted his life to demonizing and undermining the White British.

Blasted to death

The martyr-cult of St Stephen Lawrence is Dr Stone’s greatest triumph. As I pointed out in “The Land of Lies,” the cult promotes the lie that Whites are an ominous and ever-present threat to the well-being of non-Whites. The truth is completely the opposite. Non-Whites are a massive threat to Whites, not vice versa. They are also a massive threat to each other, as this genuinely shocking story proves:

Abraham Badru, Black victim of a brutal murder

Police believe the killer of a personal trainer shot dead in a London street may have bragged about the murder, as the victim’s mother said he was targeted for testifying in a trial to bring rapists to justice. Abraham Badru, 26, was shot twice a month ago in Hackney, east London, most likely by a rented shotgun, police believe. The detective leading the murder hunt said the gunman fled the scene on a white bicycle, having ridden it into the area just minutes before the shooting on 25 March.

Badru won a bravery award for heroically stepping in to stop a gang-rape then testifying against those involved. His mother, Ronke Badru, said her son received threats from those involved in the attack, which happened at a house party in 2007. His evidence led to nine people being jailed, including one for life, but Badru had to leave London to continue his studies. He returned in 2016 only to bump into one of the people he had helped jail.

Badru’s mother said her son’s car was attacked with the mirrors and windscreen smashed, and the tyres removed. She said her son was trying to move out of the Hackney area at the time he was gunned down. She recalled the devastation when she was told her son had been shot dead: “I started shouting ‘My only child, my life is empty’. I started rolling on the floor. I was like ‘Who would choose to do this to Abraham? Who has he offended to that extent to take his life away?’ He was a very peaceful man, he wasn’t violent at all. A very respectful boy and a loving child. He loved everybody and was always at peace with everyone.”

Det[ective] Ch[ief] Insp[ector] Noel McHugh, leading the murder hunt, said the killer’s motivation was still not clear and a revenge killing for Badru’s rape trial testimony was being investigated. But McHugh stressed the motive could be something else, such as mistaken identity and said he was certain someone in the community knows who the killer is. … (Abraham Badru killer may have bragged about murder, police say, The Guardian, 25th April 2018)

A grieving Black mother whom liberals will quickly forget

Objectively speaking, that death was far worse than the death of Stephen Lawrence, who was stabbed once in a random encounter and might easily have survived. Abraham Badru was deliberately targeted by someone who fully intended to kill him using the most lethal weapon available. Whether it was a revenge-killing or a case of mistaken identity, liberals should be discussing and condemning this murder as loudly as they can.

Totally unacceptable

Here are my reasons for saying that they should. If Abraham Badru’s murder was a revenge-killing, that is completely unacceptable from a feminist point of view. A young man has lost his life because he testified against gang-rapists. And the murderer is still at large! If it was a case of mistaken identity, that is completely unacceptable from an anti-racist point of view. A young man has lost his life because he had a black face. And the murderer is still at large! But feminists and anti-racists are not discussing and condemning this murder, let alone trying to turn it into a martyr-cult. Why not? It’s simple. Although the victim meets all the necessary criteria, the villains most certainly do not.

Abraham Badru testified against Black gang-rapists. His brutal and carefully planned murder was carried out by a Black. In other words, his tragic death cannot be used to demonize and undermine the White majority. That is why it will flash through the British media like a meteor, briefly glimpsed and then gone forever. The Metropolitan police in London have spent more than £50 million trying to bring all of Stephen Lawrence’s killers to justice. They will not spend a fraction of that amount on trying to solve the murder of Abraham Badru.

Names that don’t belong here

After all, there are many other murders in 2018 calling for their attention, including those of the teenagers Oluwadamilolda Odeyingbo, Hasan Ozcan, Sabri Chibani, Lord Promise Nkenda, Abdikarim Hassan, Kelvin Odunuyi, Amaan Shakoor and Israel Ogunsola. Those are vibrant non-White names from a heavily enriched city. In some or even all cases, the dead teenagers could have easily been the perpetrators of murder rather than its victims. That’s the overwhelming rule in London: non-Whites murder and are murdered by other non-Whites.

The reality of inter-racial murder in Britain

Non-Whites also murder, rape, and rob Whites. But the police find it more difficult to solve crimes committed by non-Whites because of the rule against “snitching” (like “Fed,” the word was popularized here by American gangsta-rap). This is another reason for saying that the murder of Abraham Badru was objectively worse than the murder of Stephen Lawrence, after which all the White suspects were quickly named to the police by their “community.”

Another meteor-murder

And those White suspects were not involved in gang-rape. The White working-class despise rapists and paedophiles, classifying them as “nonces” and subjecting them to ostracism and violence. That is not true among non-Whites like Blacks and Pakistanis, who commit sex-crimes at much higher rates and in a much more organized way. You could describe sex-crime as a recreational activity among some vibrant non-White communities.

That was evident in another of Britain’s many meteor-murders, briefly glimpsed in the media and then gone for ever. If you ask British liberals who Stephen Lawrence was, pious expressions will fill their faces and they’ll be able to tell you at great length about his “horrific” death at the hands of evil White racists. If you ask British liberals who Mary-Ann Leneghan was, you’ll get blank expressions and no reply. But on all objective criteria, the murder of Mary-Ann Leneghan was much worse than the murder of Stephen Lawrence:

Mary-Ann Leneghan, a long-forgotten nobody

A teenager wept today as she told how she knelt side by side with her friend Mary-Ann Leneghan waiting to be murdered by a gang of men who had raped and tortured them. The 19-year-old woman, who can not be named for legal reasons, broke down in front of the six men accused of stabbing 16-year-old Mary-Ann to death. But the witness, who was in turn shot in the head but “miraculously” survived, went on to identify five of the six men in the dock at accused of the murder. The woman began her evidence at Reading Crown Court [in January 2006].

She described how she and Mary-Ann, her friend of 10 years, had been abducted and forced into the boot of a car as they sat in the car park of the Wallingford Arms in Reading, Berkshire on May 6 last year [2005]. She said they were taken to Room 19 of Abbey House Hotel in the city where they were beaten with a metal pole, ordered to strip, forced to perform oral sex, raped, and had boiling sugared water thrown on them.

She said the pair were shown guns and a knife, constantly told they were going to be killed and heard that they would be taken to Prospect Park in Reading. During the first day she hardly flinched as she recounted the graphic details without being hidden by a screen. But today she wept as she told how, as she was raped by a man wearing white jogging bottoms, another man said: “We are ready to go now, let’s leave these bitches now, come on let’s do it.”

She told the jury that she understood this phrase to mean “the final stage, that we were going to die, that they were going to kill us.” She said she, together with Mary-Ann, was taken out of the boot of the car and forced, stumbling and wiping blood from her head, across the park. She said the pair had been ordered to kneel on the ground side by side and were told to put pillow cases over their heads by two men, one wearing a bandana over the lower half of his face and the man with the white jogging bottoms.

With the six defendants just feet away Mary-Ann’s father sat with his hand over the mouth as the girl continued. Asked by prosecutor Richard Latham QC, what happened next she paused for around 30 seconds before looking straight ahead at the jury and saying “she [Mary-Ann Leneghan] was stabbed”. The court was told that the knife-man had been the man with the bandana and asked where on Mary-Ann’s body the man had put the knife she said: “Her upper body, her chest, her breasts, everything. She was asking ‘please not there, please not there’ whatever area she was referring to, and crying and pleading,” she said.

She told how the man with the bandana got angry saying words to the effect of “shut up”. She said that Mary-Ann then fell in a ball on the ground but the stabbing did not stop. “He got more angry because she wouldn’t sit up, he was telling her to sit up because he wanted to slit her throat… He was stabbing and then she fell,” she said. “They said something about wanting her to die slowly,” she added, before she broke down in tears. … (Friend weeps over Mary-Ann murder, The Daily Mail, 20th January 2006)

Rape, torture, murder: the killers of Mary-Ann Leneghan

Why did British feminists not turn that horrible murder into a martyr-cult? It’s simple. Although the victim meets some of the necessary criteria, the murderers most certainly do not. The “six men” were all Black except for a Muslim Albanian “asylum-seeker.” The leader of the gang, Adrian Thomas, was the son of a Black immigrant, Tony Thomas, who later expressed his contrition at being a “fringe father” to his string of illegitimate children.

In other words, the murder of Mary-Ann Leneghan could not be used to undermine and demonize the White majority in Britain. On the contrary, it was an unusually horrible example of how much Whites have been harmed by non-White immigration. It raised deeply heretical questions about non-White criminality, psychopathy, misogyny and irresponsibility. None of those questions could be answered in ways acceptable to the left. That’s why feminists didn’t care about six brutal misogynists torturing, raping, and murdering two “bitches” (from the Daily Mail story cited above).

Hearts of Stone

At least, the men did their best to murder both girls, but one of them very luckily survived the bullet that was meant to kill her. As I said: on all objective criteria, the murder of Mary-Ann Leneghan was much worse than the murder of Stephen Lawrence. But goyophobic Jews like Dr Richard Stone don’t apply objective criteria. The only thing that matters to them is whether a tragedy can be used to undermine and demonize the White majority.

That’s why Stephen Lawrence, a Black youth who died from a single knife-wound, is now England’s new patron-saint. It’s also why Mary-Ann Leneghan, a White girl who died after torture, rape and repeated stabbings, is long-forgotten. And don’t forget: Abraham Badru, Black victim of a brutal murder, will soon join her in oblivion. Dr Stone and his fellow anti-racists care only about harming Whites, not about helping Blacks.

Appendix: The Lawrence Cult in Historical Context

The warrior St George has been replaced as England’s patron saint by the martyr St Stephen, whose role will be quite different to that played by the original martyr of that name. The New Testament describes how the ancient Stephen, “full of faith and power, did great wonders and miracles among the people” (Acts 6:8). He rouses the enmity of a “synagogue” of Jews, who haul him before “the council” of Jewish elders on false charges of blasphemy.

Stephen is undaunted. Among much else, he tells his Jewish opponents that they are “stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears,” resisters of “the Holy Ghost” like their prophet-persecuting fathers before them. And now they have become “betrayers and murderers” of Jesus Christ. As one might expect, the Jews do not take this criticism lying down:

7:54 When they heard these things, they were cut to the heart, and they gnashed on him with their teeth. 7:55 But he, being full of the Holy Ghost, looked up steadfastly into heaven, and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the right hand of God, 7:56 And said, Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God.

7:57 Then they cried out with a loud voice, and stopped their ears, and ran upon him with one accord, 7:58 And cast him out of the city … 7:59 And they stoned Stephen, calling upon God, and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit. 7:60 And he kneeled down, and cried with a loud voice, Lord, lay not this sin to their charge. And when he had said this, he fell asleep. (The Book of Acts)

Stephen thereby became the first Christian martyr, which literally means “witness” (μάρτυς in Greek). By being stoned to death, he witnessed not only to the truth of Christianity, but also to the hatred and malevolence of its Jewish enemies. St Stephen, who forgave his own murderers, represented an in-group of loving Christians against an out-group of hate-filled Jews. This became a recurrent theme of Christian martyrdom. Many centuries later, in “The Prioress’s Tale” (c. 1290), Geoffrey Chaucer described the murder of a Christian boy by Jews who are angered by his songs in honour of the Virgin Mary. Chaucer adduces this “martirdom” as proof of how “oure firste foo, the serpent Sathanas, … hath in Jewes herte his waspes nest.” That was fiction, but medieval Europe had many martyr-cults devoted to Christian children who had allegedly fallen victim to ritual murder by Christ-hating Jews.

All of these cults bore witness to the goodness of an in-group, Christians, against the malevolence of an out-group, Jews. And Jews often became an out-group in another sense: they were regularly expelled from Christian lands as alleged exploiters, manipulators and subverters. In 1290, for example, Edward I issued his infamous Edict of Expulsion, banishing Jews from England with the enthusiastic support of both the nobility and the general population. Whatever the rights and wrongs of such expulsions, which were also sometimes directed at gypsies, one thing was very clear: gentile nations did not need Jews or any other minority to survive and prosper.

But that is a blasphemous idea in the contemporary West, whose new state religion is not Christianity but minority worship. The martyr-cult of St Stephen Lawrence bears witness to the goodness of an in-group, ethnic minorities, against the malevolence of an out-group, the White majority. The cult is clearly pathological, because the state apparatus of a White nation is now working against the interests of Whites. However, this pathology has obvious parallels in the behaviour of animals whose nervous systems have been subverted by parasites. For more on this topic, see my articles “Verbal Venom: Biological Parallels for Western Pathologies” and “How to Cure a White Zombie: Ants, Crabbs and Societal Control.”

Just when I think that I cannot be any further amazed at the total control of the media message by White hating Jews, new examples of of the parallel universe of Judaic faux reality choke the atmosphere like a cloud of phosgene gas.

Remember, the Jews were the most fanatical opponents of Hellenism in any form. And their riots after their expulsion from Israel in Alexandria and elsewhere included their extravaganza on Cyprus where they murdered 240,000 gentiles. And don’t forget Genrikh Yagoda, who starved 5-10 million Ukrainians to death in 1932/33. Make no mistake, when Englishmen no longer roam in England, Jews are sure they’ll be able to handle the Mohammedans and African tribesmen with no problems.

The ‘Daily Mail’ is supposed to be a ‘conservative’ paper – it has the largest on-line readership (traditionally right wing readership). At present the DM has almost daily articles about the new saint. So even the conservative press (conservative readership anyway) is bowing to the far-left.

Also, S.Lawrence’s mother has been made a Dame and she now sits in the House of Lords. They will not be content until she is Queen of England.

The elite are slapping the people in the face and the people just take it. The explanation for this submission by whites and for the unprovoked hostility against whites lies in the field of animal behavior patterns, not in seeking explanations based on assuming the Jews or the left or the globalists or any group will somehow benefit from white downfall. Clearly neither the wealthy Jews nor the wealthy left will benefit from white collapse, and they know it, but it does not deter them in the slightest.

All this happens, including the S Lawrence reverence, because our subset of white-haters from the indigenous population has gravitated over the years to the MSM and politics and education, and this minority makes these things happen. But they are still a minority that could easily be ousted, albeit a very dedicated and aggressive one, and one that is fully prepared to partake in the misery themselves that is the obvious outcome of their efforts. And the hostile subset (wired that way) has been joined in the battle (simmering civil war?) by hostile Jews who are subtle (but not that subtle if you have ears and eyes) and by muslims who are not subtle in the slightest.

The only motive for behaving like this – destroying the system that makes you safe and wealthy (and destroying it for your children also) – must be one at the animal behaviour level, as self-interest would not lead Jews or genetic-lefties to destroy the system that makes them wealthy and safe.

The only behaviour pattern stronger than self-interest is hate. This is often demonstrated by divorcing couples.

So where does the hatred come from? Perhaps there are simply a subset of people wired to hate anyone better. We can see how this would have been advantageous in prehistoric times, as it would able them to take what others had with impunity (ie no remorse, no regret, and a strong motive -‘we hate them’). A population could not, with natural selection, eliminate such ‘bad’ genes, as when they became smaller in proportion in prehistoric times, their advantage increased (like a parasite/host equilibrium). The thief and pillager gene type has an easier time in the land of the honest hunter gatherers. An equilibrium would result – about 15% or less genetic far-left seems to be their level.

As for the hostility of the Jews, maybe that is wired in them also. Once again, we can see how it might help them in desert tribal warfare, as hatred of others goes hand in hand with excessive loyalty to your own tribe.

We do not need to ponder about how could Jews benefit from their actions (In fact this is excusing them if there is some benefit). A genetic hostility to other tribes explains more of what they do than trying to find benefits for them does, as an irrational inbuilt hostility also explains why they do things against their own interest, ie bite the hand that feeds them.

No animal species including humans ‘thinks about it’ then acts on what logic tells them is best interest. Animals and humans just obey their instincts, not logic. We inherit our behaviour patterns from selection pressures that operated in a different time and place, when life was hard, not like at present when life is easy in the West – in terms of food and shelter provision. Natural selection cannot fix in a few generations genes whose bad effects have only recently manifest themselves in modern wealthy Western society, genes that might cause our downfall in the next century. Nat sele cannot swiftly correct the genes that were selected for over thousands of years in harsh environments, when we have only been in comfortable environments for a hundred years or a bit longer, and 100 years is not long to correct ‘errors’, ie the error is the whites carry a subset of haters of the better in the gene pool, and their presence coupled with a severe lack of racism is our downfall, as the majority have allowed the haters to take over. Our individualism is a weakness to be exploited by other races that are very tribal and hostile.

Normal equilibrium processes that would disadvantage the haters when they got the upper hand in prehistoric times do not apply when there is no struggle for food and shelter. The strong are not selected to lead us, instead, those with inner drives do ie the left.

Negrolatry(or Negro Idolatry) has power because of combination of white cuckery and white guilt. White guilt alone doesn’t go very far. Spanish killed tons of natives in South America, but most people don’t care because the short brown indigenos are seen as lame.

It’s because Anglos are so taken with black music, black jive, black rhythm, black booty, black dong, black muscle, black sports, and etc. that they go for Negrolatry. In other words, it would exist even without white guilt about blacks though, to be sure, the ‘white guilt’ element gives it a certain glow.
Suppose there never was slave trade or imperialism. Suppose some blacks came to the UK and made funky music, won in sports, acted wild and fun, shook their booties, and swung their dongs. In a libertine hedonistic society, they’d get much attention bordering on mammonic love.

The Brits look back on their history and see repression, rigidity, inhibition, coldness, and etc.
So, Brit history is seen as ice, fog, and overcast skies. But the Negro comes along with the heat, friction, and warmth. It’s like the sun finally broke through, and there is heat generated within the body with all that grinding, bumping, and humping. It was the great liberation from frigidity of cold damp Britain. It’s like how the nuns in LILIES OF THE FIELD turn into Lilies of the Field Negro.

So, why does this Negro kid matter so much? Because of the Negro-as-metaphor of warmth, soulfulness, heat, and radiance brought to Brits. Modern Britain may have been saved militarily by Winston Churchill, but the Narrative is it was finally liberated from its own shackles by the Magic Negro. The subconscious narrative goes… If Anglos ended the slave trade and freed blacks from physical bondage, the Negro soul and rhythm liberated Anglos from the chains of repression, manners, and politesse. And this is why the Beatles and Stones were so significant. Britain, though highly accomplished in literature, had lagged in musical achievements compared to Italians, Germans, French, Russians, etc. Brits were too orderly and ‘bourgeois’ to have the passion.

But in pop music inspired by black music, the Brits once exploded all over and dominated the world for a couple of decades. So, in the British Mind, the Negro is holy. Negro is the booty-and-dong-messiah that thawed the white body from repression and made it boogie woogie like a Negro. And one must say it is true enough that black influence did wonders for Brit pop music. Consider Bee Gees ‘stayin alive’, a great song. And Clash and Sting took a lot from reggae.

So, to better understand Negrolatry, one has to look to Pop Culture and Sex.

Because of the role of the Negro in modern British cultural imagination, black are now seen as the natural royalty. Afro-royalty or Afroyalty is becoming the new trope in not only UK but in EU. Listen to Macron speak of Eurafrica. It will lead to the Othelloing of Europe without even an Iago to mess things up. If anything, the neo-Iago is there to help the Negro go around yelling ‘where da white women at?’

For most people, culture is about fun, thrills, and excitement. They love blockbuster movies, dumb TV shows, music videos. rap music, pornification of mainstream culture, pulp fiction, trash comedy, (look at the success of Stephen King novels and 50 SHADES OF GREY), etc.

So, for most people, blacks are the natural royalty because black women shake their booties so lasciviously. And there is the song-and-dong factor with black men. They sing rap about ‘muh dic*’, and most women think about sex than ideas at most times.

Chelsea Handler is a Jewish comedienne. She may be higher IQ and grew up with privilege, but she’s a song-and-dong girl.

Anglo-Saxons are turning into Junglo-Saxons because of these factors.
It could well be that Jewish power will be destroyed by black dongs. If Chelsea Handler is sign of future Jewishness pooterin passion, it will be junglowizc fever. It’s no wonder so many Jewish guys feel dejected and go with Asian girls. But that will lead to Jewish dissipation because of yellow mellow factor. Jewish power grew from high IQ, tribalism, and chutzpah. But if future Jewish kids are yellow-mellowed, they will be obedient than pushy. Look at Sean Lennon. John Lennon had a kid with Yoko, and the result is some dork-ass kibbler. (Incidentally, Cynthia Lennon, who was dumped by John, went off with a Negro).

Most people prefer to watch TV, movies, and listen to pop music than do heady stuff involving intelligence and ideas. More women talk about inches on puds than calculus of the universe just like most men are more interested in boob measurements than latest physics formulas about black holes.

This is why there is a real chance of the world turning black. Blacks got all of Sub-Saharan Africa. They will take over Brazil which is already 60% black. They are the majority of Cuba. Blacks are the main idols of US and UK and France. Canada worships Negroes. Jungle Fever is promoted all over EU. Japan promotes half-black kids of black fathers. They will take over sports and will become the ‘national heroes’ as athletes are the biggest heroes of any nation. Then, Japanese will cheer for black heroes, and more Africans will come and have kids with Japanese women, and Japanese women will be cuck-roaches. Few yrs back, Miss Japan was black child of a black father, and she attacked Japan of being ‘racist’ and called for open borders. She is now the new voice of Japanese national conscience.

In France, tons of black babies are being born, and lots from white wombs. And Macron the cuck is calling for 200 million blacks in EU to colonize white wombs.

Now, this could be stopped with race-ism. It’s obvious that nothing more destructive of civilization than black DNA. Too Many Blacks always means social breakdown: Africa, Brazil, Detroit, Baltimore, parts of London, parts of Paris, and etc.
But, all this Afroyalty mindset has white folks worshiping blacks like the animals worship the lions as natural royalty in THE LION BLING.
Also, white guilt about blacks have become so sacralized that it’s gone universal. So, not only must the West open up to more and more Negroes but Japan too is attacked as ‘racist’ if it has doubts about the blessing of having too many Negroes.

Homos and Negroes. There is a universalist cult around those two groups. All societies are expected to ‘welcome’, ‘include’, and celebrate them as special. And of course, the two groups have bee promoted mostly by Jews who seek to weaken and break down gentile(especially white and Christian) pride and defenses against globalism.

The Western elites like reggae, and ‘white trash’ are into rap.

In a poll, elites chose reggae as their favorite music.
They like chillbilly calypso music for some reason.

I think you’re putting the cart before the horse. Black ‘culture’ in any form is vastly inferior and primitive compared to its White counterpart. It has become the in-thing because of a protracted multi-dimensional campaign to glorify all things black. Just look at films, advertisements and the generally hagiographic attitude to all things black. Blacks and their ‘culture’ have been made ‘cool’ in the same way Lucky Strike became ‘the favourite cigarette of doctors’.

Further to what you’re saying, it’s a matter of some interest to me, perhaps to you too, that the now widespread use of “culture” in the stripped down, denatured anthropological-sociological sense is, etymologically speaking, quite a recent phenomenon. The OED’s earliest documentation of the loose use of the word in this “folkways” sense dates only from 1901, and such use remains very rare till the 1960s.

I don’t think it’s a stretch to see in this transformation another microcosmic instance of revolution within the forms.

Nowadays, of course, when the (((Establishment media))) deign to speak of culture in its classic older sense* of “cultivation or development of high intellectual, moral, and aesthetic faculties,” they invariably surround the word with sneer quotes or else place it in a context where the sneer is impossible to miss.

In short, to use H. W. Fowler’s lamenting expression, “culture” has become a worsened word.
_______________*Older, that is, at least as differentiated from the word’s well-established use in the laboratory or the planting field or the greenhouse.

His point is still valid though. There is a global effort by people with extreme power to flood white western nations with blacks, get whites to worship blacks, get whites to mix with blacks, and to treat blacks as virtual gods. In addition to black worship and especially worship of ´superior sexual physical superior black men!!´´ there is also an extremely powerful push for transsexual crap everywhere, gay agenda and gay worship everywhere. It is sickening and it makes you wonder if the agenda is for blacks to dominate the entire world and if they will in turn also destroy the elite. This could get out of hand. If the elite narrow it down simply to the west and mongrelizing the west and then starving off africa it could work. But if everything stays the same and western aid, food, organizations and money continue to help extend the lives of black africans and feed them then by 2100 there will be 4 billion blacks to possibly 8 billion. The 4 billion number is the estimate ASSUMING birthrates decline rapidly, 6 billion is medium and 8 billion is high. Europe meanwhile already 50 million non white largely middle eastern muslims will increase to 100 or 200 million or more and white europe population will be below 500 million.

What he said about Brazil is wrong though it is not 60% black. Brazil actually is really only 5% to 6% and even that % is not full black. They are more watered down then African americans, african american blacks like 95% are 30% to 40% or at least 20% non negroid. The vast majority are 30% to 40% non pure negroid by the way. However, his other points still stand we could very well end up in a world where all of the entire western white world is black dominated, and latin america, and arab/muslim countries and east asia retains their own homogenity. I dont see latin america worshipping blacks anytime soon, nor do I see Arabs in north africa, or the middle east or all non black muslim countries doing that. Asia in general as a continent is very anti black but you never know. I think the non evolved alturistic traits of other races will save them.

That’s the extended dance version.
The short version for men:
Control your women or someone else will.
For women: Submit to the authority of men who care about you or you will submit to the authority of ones who don’t.

You have listed a number of driving forces which alltogether lead into the direction of black people taking over the non-black (white and asian) world. — It is very important to know that such driving forces exist. Nonetheless, there are other driving forces that lead against that. They lead into a pure white population in the future. This fight has not ended yet, and there has been no decision about the outcome of this fight.

I want to show one, only one point from that other side. Of cause, each points can have side effects, each can have another outcome than that which I tell. We talk about the future, and about a subject that has many “facettes”. So please read the following point “with a grain of salt”.

In Germany, since the year 2015, we have had in inrush of about 2 million nonwhite men, mostly young men in their twenties, mostly muslims. Of cause, this is a catastrophe to our folk and our land. Nonetheless, it is something like a bitter medicine: It is ugly, it is disgusting, it tastes very bitterly, but it was the only medicine that could make the deeply sleeping German folk wake up.

And that medicine has worked! Many Germans are awaken now! They have stoppend sleeping!
Things are going the positive way for us in the future. The multikultifriends (=those who kill the white race) are defending their “religion”, but they are forced to go one step backwards every day. Common sense is winning now.
We Germans can handle the whole problem within 14 days. But we cannot do this alone. It is a task for all white folks to do the work together. White folks, let us work together in order that our white folks (peoples) can survive.
Together we will stand, alone we will fall.

After Saint Stephen came unstuck there was another one. Damilola Taylor came from Nigeria to defraud the National Health Service. When he was killed the main stream media loved it; more grist for the mill, for their race hate narrative. When it turned out that the perpetrator were also black the media lost interest. Source is athttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Damilola_Taylor

I don’t disagree with the general gist of this article. It’s highly disturbing to me to read about such atrocities and then to see establishment media completely ignore the obvious connection between Third World migrants and skyrocketing crime. But I also can’t ignore the obvious defect in the thinking of contemporary whites when it comes to their total failure to advance their discrete genetic interests. Without this defect, European and Anglo civilization would not be in current suicide mode. Sad to say, but a people that ignores its specific interests and allows them to be supplanted by the specific interests of competing aliens deserves to die.

I agree, blacks will finish off Britain, France, and America. Hitler saw this coming a long time ago, he wrote about it.

I cannot emphasize enough how toxic the marriage of modernity and negritude really is. Because modernity tends to, by feeding and supporting everyone, lead to the proliferation of r type reproduction, and celebrate through mass media those with presence. Which includes negroes, given their muscularity and rhythmic talents.

So, ironically enough, the more “advanced” we become the more we accept negroes and the more they breed and take over. Blacks will advance to 25% of the American population even as we deplete everything. Nothing less than a total collapse can save us.

Eastern Europe and Asia will never fall to the negro. Their instincts are too strong. China is already the new center of civilization in the world, it’s just the world system has trouble catching up and realizing it. When the realization comes, everything will be torn to shreds. America will fall to civil war, guaranteed. Britain will be a bit player, with the remaining whites struggling against all odds for a reconquista.

Absolutely spot on. If it doesn’t make Whitey feel guilty, then lets sweep it under the carpet pronto. The media disgusts me. And as for all those White faces of the victims of non-whites, they are a mere fraction of the total. Our people mean nothing to the disgraceful grovelling traitors of this once great country.