I am contacting you today because I am very concerned about the level of
animal care at the Southern Research Institute (64-R-0001). This facility has
had several recent incidents of negligence which have unnecessarily killed
animals. Potentially the most disturbing part of this is that these incidents of
negligence have apparently not been addressed by USDA/APHIS/AC in terms of
inspections or enforcement, despite the fact that this information has been in
the hands of your office for over a year.

According to the Annual report filed by the Southern Research Institute in
November of 2009, there were several incidents involving potentially negligent
deaths of primates. One incident involved the death of a primate whose head had
become caught in a cage. How long did this animal suffer this way? Did he/she
starve to death or die of dehydration? Was it some injury caused by the
entrapment? These issues are not addressed in any way.

The same report discusses the death of a primate following blood collection.
This incident is not attributed to disease, injury, etc. Did the monkey simply
bleed to death? Was air introduced into the bloodstream? These issues are not
addressed.

A third monkey was found dead the morning after administration of a test
article. While the report discusses the potential toxicity of the test article,
this totally ignores the possibility that the animal was dosed improperly, and
that the cause of was therefore negligence.

Similarly, the report states that “2 cotton rats were found dead. Mortality did
not appear to be directly related to use of the test article or any procedure
conducted during the study.” In other words, the staff of this facility have no
idea whatsoever what took the lives of these animals.

The incidents related in the annual report of this facility clearly indicate
potential incidents of negligence which may have violated at least three
portions of the Animal Welfare Act (code cited below): 2.131 Handling of
animals, 2.32 Personnel Qualifications, and 2.33 Attending Veterinarian and
adequate veterinary care. If animals are dying after blood collection this
indicates potentially unqualified personnel, if they are being found dead with
the head stuck in a cage, or simply found dead with no idea as to the possible
cause, then this is clearly a situation of inadequate observation of animals and
therefore inadequate veterinary care, etc.

Therefore, in light of these many issues which clearly demonstrate major
problems within both animal care and accountability at the Southern Research
Institute, I officially request that you immediately commission an investigation
of all of these incidents at Southern Research Institute.

I expect that your office will reply to this correspondence within five business
days.