Both sides distract, or highlight anything when they feel its the smart political move. I don't mind that. I respect smart politics. But once something like this hit we have to demand a special investigator. Not for Benghazzi though at some point Congress has to take the CIA and White story, say if you agree or not, then move on. Obama has a right to **** up the military and our overseas crap and not get in trouble for it. But.....the IRS thing just feel different.

The guy who resigned took current job may 8th from some lady now running Obamcare for the IRS. She had job through the whole scandal. How is it she isn't resigning or getting in trouble. This feels like something you can't let an Obama buddy handle. Holder should tell the President he should appoint a special investigator.

This woman might very well be the one who ordered the IRS clowns in Cincinnati to target conservative organizations...and now she's in charge basically of people's healthcare......I wonder if a conservative woman needing a heart transplant is deemed worthy of one in her eyes. But of course the leftists on here will say there's nothing to worry about.

She'll be in charge of investigating individuals to collect the "Obamacare Tax", that the IRS has no legal authority to do.

Watching the IRS hearings, so far,to the dismay of reps there's nothing there. Iol, Douglas shulman,GWBs appointee,is getting a lot of air time. Either way, ties to the white house are seemingly being debunked.

I’ve been told today by several reporters that President Obama’s White House counsel, Kathryn Ruemmler, knew for several days — perhaps weeks —that some Internal Revenue Service officials were engaging in political targeting of conservative groups, and that she did not tell the president as soon as she knew even partial reports about the story.

With all due respect to someone who has impeccable legal credentials, if she did have such foreknowledge and didn’t inform the president immediately, I respectfully suggest Ms. Ruemmler is in the wrong job and that she should resign.

Do you think the first time he heard about this was on the news media the same as all of us? .........I can sell you some swamp land?

What actual difference does it make,When he heard about it, it doesn't tie him to it. Damn,you guys are getting pretty desperate. I've been watching the actual hearings,and so far from what's been testified, Rethugs are doing more to prove this was a screw up by some IRS agents,then some Ill fated plot to go after the tea party.

Charlie Rangle says "This Is Wrong to Abuse the Tax System"
(you can't make this crap up folks ........)

Rep. Charlie Rangel (D., N.Y.), who was notably censured for not paying 17 years worth of taxes on rental income from a Dominican Republic villa he owned, said Friday morning, “This is wrong to abuse the tax system.”

Rangel also filed years worth of misleading financial disclosure reports that did not fully disclose his assets.

The Treasury Department’s inspector general told senior Treasury officials in June 2012 he was investigating allegations that the Internal Revenue Service had targeted conservative groups, disclosing for the first time on Friday that Obama administration officials were aware of the matter during the presidential campaign year.

Today the spokesperson for the IRS said that he didn't believe the conservative groups were targeted, but that they were guilty of giving "very poor customer service"....and said "mistakes were made" and then, I **** you not stated that the "mistakes were probably politically motivated"....

Today the spokesperson for the IRS said that he didn't believe the conservative groups were targeted, but that they were guilty of giving "very poor customer service"....and said "mistakes were made" and then, I **** you not stated that the "mistakes were probably politically motivated"....

you cannot make this **** up I tell you.....

Either that spokesman doesn't know what he's talking about or you're misrepresenting what he actually said. I watched the majority of the hearing and as a matter of fact was watching when these statements were made. He stated that because all 501s,527sc4 & what have you are political in nature that they all get put in a group for extra scrutiny. He never said they were politically motivated in their process.The problem came from the personel and how they processed them & the shortcuts they made.

What actual difference does it make,When he heard about it, it doesn't tie him to it. Damn,you guys are getting pretty desperate. I've been watching the actual hearings,and so far from what's been testified, Rethugs are doing more to prove this was a screw up by some IRS agents,then some Ill fated plot to go after the tea party.

Either that spokesman doesn't know what he's talking about or you're misrepresenting what he actually said. I watched the majority of the hearing and as a matter of fact was watching when these statements were made. He stated that because all 501s,527sc4 & what have you are political in nature that they all get put in a group for extra scrutiny. He never said they were politically motivated in their process.The problem came from the personel and how they processed them & the shortcuts they made.

"The Personnel" being some amorphous entity they either are unable to "remember" or otherwise name, but who is, of course still employed.