65 Luke xix. 19. In chap. 12 Origen reads: Be thou also over five cities -as W. & H., and comments on the difference of the reward. The MSS. are therefore in error here.

66 Gal. ii. 4.

67 1 Cor. xv. 52.

68 Matt. xviii. 24.

69 Ezek. ix. 6.

70 Zech. v. 7,8.

71 2 Thess. ii. 3,4.

72 Prov. xx. 6

73 Exod. xxv. 39.

74 1 Chron. xxii. 14.

75 Matt. xviii. 25.

76 Matt. xviii. 26.

77 Matt. xviii. 28.

78 2 Thess. ii. 3.

79 1 Cor. ii. 10.

80 Mark iv. 34.

81 John xxi. 25.

82 Matt. xxv. 14-30.

83 Luke xix. 12-27.

84 Matt. xxv. 14, 15.

85 Matt. xxv. 19.

86 Matt. xviii. 24.

87 2 Cor. v. 6.

88 Matt. xxv. 19.

89 Luke xix. 12, 13.

90 Luke xix. 17.

91 Luke xix. 19.

92 Luke xix. 22.

93 Luke xix. 24.

94 Luke xix. 14.

95 Matt. xviii. 23.

96 Luke xix. 12.

97 Matt. xviii. 24.

98 Gal. iv. 26.

99 Rev. xxi. 2.

100 Matt. xviii. 28.

101 Matt. xvii. 26, 29.

102 Matt. xviii. 31.

103 Matt. xviii. 34.

104 That is, the God of the Old Testament-according to Marcion.

105 Matt. xviii. 35.

106 Luke xix. 27.

107 Matt. xix. 1.

108 Matt. v. 33.

109 Mark xiv. 49; Matt. xxvi. 56.

110 1 Cor. ii. 13.

111 teletaj. Origen's play on the words etelesen and teleth cannot be fully reproduced in English. The word teleth, in reference to the mysteries, meant the rite, or participation in the rite, by which one became perfect; and in later Christian usage it was applied to the Sacraments of Baptism and the Lord's Supper. See Suicer.

112 John vi. 44.

113 1 Cor. ii. 4. Pneumatoj dunamewj. The omission of the ?? is strange; for in the Contra Celsum (i. 2) Origen characterises the argument from prophecy as "the demonstration of the Spirit" and the argument from miracles as "the demonstration of power."