Claim CA120:

If our minds arose from lesser animals via natural processes, then our
minds may be fallible. Then the conclusions that we come up with are
subject to doubt, including the conclusion of evolution itself.

Darwin (1881) wrote in a letter, "With me the horrid doubt always arises
whether the convictions of man's mind, which has been developed from the
mind of the lower animals, are of any value or are at all trustworthy."

Source:

Response:

It is well established that the mind is fallible. Ordinary memory and
reasoning are mistaken surprisingly often (Gilovich 1991; Schacter
2001). Pathologies add further complications (Sacks 1970). This
fallibility exists whatever the source of our minds may be.

Doubt exists in all areas of life. Nothing can be
proven
absolutely. However, many things are certain enough that we call them
facts and do not worry about the possibility that they are wrong until
we see actual evidence that they are wrong. Without such an attitude,
we would never be able to get on with our lives.

The fallibility of our minds argues more against creationism.
Nobody can be certain of it either, and minds as imperfect as ours
argue against their being divinely created.

Darwin only applied this argument to questions beyond the scope of
science. He thought science was well within the scope of a modified
monkey brain.