Former producer sues Fox News, Bill O'Reilly for defamation

Tuesday, 05 December 2017, 05:30:55 AM. Rachel Witlieb Bernstein, is suing Fox News and its former star, Bill O'Reilly, for their comments following a blockbuster New York Times story outlining millions of dollars that were paid to silence accusers.

Rachel Witlieb Bernstein, a former associate producer at Fox News, is suing her former employer and its former star, Bill O’Reilly, for comments they made following a blockbuster New York Times story outlining millions of dollars that were paid to silence women who accused O’Reilly of harassment.

More media coverage

ESPN layoffs: Latest cuts to claim over 100 employees

'Access Hollywood' fires back at Trump: 'The tape is very real'

Bernstein, who is one of six women known to have been paid a settlement regarding accusations about O’Reilly, claims in a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York that the former host is a “liar” for repeatedly claiming there is no truth to the allegations against him. The New York Times was first to report about the lawsuit.

“He mistreated Ms. Bernstein,” the lawsuit states. “She was forced out of her job at Fox News and paid a settlement because of his mistreatment.”

At issue are public statements O’Reilly has made following his ouster at Fox News. The New York Times has reported that at least six former Fox News personalities and employees have been paid $45 million to settle claims of sexual and verbal assault. In October, the Times reported that former Fox News legal analyst Lis Wiehl was paid $32 million to settle sexual harassment allegations, a payment the network made before re-signing the star in January to a new four-year contract. O’Reilly was fired in April after advertisers began to boycott his popular Fox News show.

O’Reilly has insisted he did nothing wrong. He has said he only agreed to the settlements to protect his children and has painted the allegations as a false and malicious campaign to silence him.

“Just like other prominent and controversial people, I’m vulnerable to lawsuits from individuals who want me to pay them to avoid negative publicity,” O’Reilly said in a statement after the payouts became public.

Neil Mullin, Bernstein’s lawyer, said Bernstein should have been protected from O’Reilly’s public accusations by a non-disparagement clause and a confidentially clause that were part of the settlement. Because of O’Reilly’s comments, Bernstein, now a supervising producer on TBS’ Conan, has suffered “severe emotional distress, physical sickness, and loss of income,” the lawsuit says.

“The confidentiality clause made it really clear. It said basically that if you’re asked by the press about this case just simply say that the matter was settled,” Mullin said. “That’s simple as pie. Now you can see how far O’Reilly has strayed from that simple mandate.”

He added: “The plain implication is awful, it’s just awful what he’s suggesting about our client and frankly about all the women in the settlements. Imagine how women feel when a man of his wealth and power is out there suggesting they’re all a bunch of extortionists. They’re all a bunch of liars. They’re all a bunch of political hatchet women.”

Bernstein’s lawsuit also targets Fox News over claims the network made in an April 1 statement that said no current or former Fox News employee had used the 21st Century Fox hotline to raise a concern about O’Reilly.

The hotline didn’t exist at the time Bernstein was employed by the network, according to Mullin. Bernstein, who worked there from 1996 to 2002, took her complaints to human resources, former executive Bill Shine and other top officials at the network, Mullin said.

“She complained to various people of authority and they didn’t protect her. She did complain and it’s a lie to say she didn’t,” Mullin said.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines Commenting policy | Comments FAQ

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Trade marks and images used in the design are the copyright of their respective owners and are used for demo purposes only.All copyright is reserved by the original source cited.We are not responsible for the content of all article.If you want to remove any articles, please Contact us or email me pactimza@msn.com