Ray McGovern: My Take

Military Tribunal May Keep 9/11 Motives Hidden

Military
Tribunal May Keep 9/11 Motives
Hidden

By Ray McGovern

The Obama
administration’s decision to use a military tribunal rather than a federal
criminal court to try alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four
others means the real motives behind the 9/11 attacks may remain obscure.

The Likud
Lobby and their allied U.S. legislators can chalk up a significant victory for
substantially shrinking any opportunity for the accused planners of 9/11 to
tell their side of the story.

What? I sense some bristling. “Their
side of the story?” Indeed! We’ve been told there is no “their side of the
story.”

Bromides
Vice Explanations

For years, President George W. Bush got away with offering
up the risible explanation that they “hate our freedoms.” The stenographers of the White House press corps may
have had to suppress smiles but silently swallowed the
“they-hate-us-for-our-freedoms” rationale.

The only
journalist I can recall stepping up and asking, in effect, “Come on; now
really; it’s important; why do they really hate us” was the indomitable Helen Thomas.

In January 2010, two weeks after Umar Farouk
Abdulmutallab, the “underpants bomber,” tried to down an airliner over Detroit,
President Barack Obama asked White House counter-terrorism guru, John Brennan,
to field questions from the White House press.

Helen Thomas
took the opportunity to ask why the would-be bomber did what he did. The exchange with Brennan is, hopefully, more
instructive than it is depressing — highlighting a limited mindset still bogged
down in bromides.

Thomas:
"Why do they want to do us harm? And what is the motivation? We never hear
what you find out on why."

Brennan:
"Al Qaeda is an organization that is dedicated to murder and wanton
slaughter of innocents. ... They
attract individuals like Mr. Abdulmutallab and use them for these types of
attacks. He was motivated by a sense of religious sort of drive. Unfortunately,
al Qaeda has perverted Islam, and has corrupted the concept of Islam, so that
he's (sic) able to attract these individuals. But al Qaeda has the agenda of
destruction and death."

Thomas:
"And you're saying it's because of religion?"

Brennan:
"I'm saying it's because of an al Qaeda organization that used the banner
of religion in a very perverse and corrupt way."

Thomas:
"Why?"

Brennan:
"I think this is a long issue, but al Qaeda is just determined to carry
out attacks here against the homeland."

Thomas:
"But you haven't explained why."

One should, I suppose, be grateful for small favors. At
least Brennan did not adduce the they-hate-our-freedoms rationale.

So Why?

After the Obama administration announced on Nov. 13, 2009,
that it intended to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in federal court for murder, I
wrote an article
which began by quoting ACLU attorney Denney LeBoeuf regarding some unpleasant
facts, such as torture, that the case was likely to reveal.

“I think that we’re going to shine a light on something
that a lot of people don’t want to look at,” LeBoeuf said.

Never much for political correctness, I also went into
some detail on the light that might be shed on more plausible reasons why “they
hate us” — Exhibit A being U.S. support for Israel’s oppression of the
Palestinians. You will not find much on this in the Fawning Corporate Media
(FCM), but there is no lack of evidence.

I included, for example, the findings of a Sept. 23, 2004,
report of the Pentagon-appointed U.S. Defense Science Board, which I’d suggest
now has additional impact in light of the tumult in the Middle East and
Northern Africa:

“Muslims
do not ‘hate our freedom,’ but rather, they hate our policies. The overwhelming majority voice their objections to
what they see as one-sided support in favor of Israel and against Palestinian
rights, and the longstanding, even increasing support for what Muslims
collectively see as tyrannies, most notably Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan,
Pakistan, and the Gulf States.”

The FCM
ignored the Defense Science Board report for two months. Finally, on Nov. 24, 2004,
the New York Times
published a story on the report — but with some revealing surgery in the above
paragraph. The Times quoted the first sentence, but
pressed the delete button for the one on what Muslims do object to — “what they
see as one-sided support in favor of Israel and against Palestinian rights…”

The Times story did include the sentence from
the original report that immediately followed the (excised) sentence about
Israel. So it was clearly a case of surgical removal of the offending
sentence, not merely a need to shorten the paragraph.

Even More Obvious Revisions

Back to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed: As he was being
interrogated, the drafters of the 9/11 Commission Report found themselves
wondering why he would bear such hatred toward the U.S.

They were
aware that he earned a degree in mechanical engineering from the University of
North Carolina/Greensboro, and
speculated that he suffered some kind of gross indignity during his years
there.

Not the case, the drafters were told by those with access
to the interrogation reports. Rather, the report concludes on page 147:

“By his
own account, KSM’s animus toward the United States stemmed not from his
experience there as a student, but rather from his violent disagreement with
U.S. foreign policy favoring Israel.”

This is
among the considerations that prompted the authors to observe later in the
Commission report:

“America’s
policy choices have consequences. Right or wrong, it is simply a fact that
American policy regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and American actions
in Iraq are dominant staples of popular commentary across the Arab and Muslim
world. … Neither Israel nor the new Iraq will be safer if worldwide Islamist
terrorism grows stronger.”

As for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s motivation, the neocon
editors of the Washington Post waited
a decent interval — five years – apparently in hopes that few readers would get
as far as page 147 in the 9/11 Commission report, and/or that those who did
would have short memories.

On Aug. 30, 2009, the Post
cited an unspecified “intelligence summary” for a brand new explanation of his
motives:

“KSM’s
limited and negative experience in the United States —which included a brief
jail stay because of unpaid bills — almost certainly helped propel him on his
path to becoming a terrorist. … He stated that his contact with the Americans,
while minimal, confirmed his view that the United States was a debauched and
racist country.”

Let’s give the Post the
benefit of the doubt. It could be, I suppose, that the above did not come from
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed until his 183rd waterboarding session. In any case, the
revised explanation of his motives is surely politically more convenient to
those wishing to obscure Mohammed’s other explanation implicating “U.S. foreign
policy favoring Israel.”

White House Gives Up

The New York Times
article on the Obama administration’s reversal of its earlier attempt to hold
key 9/11 trials in a federal court declared in a headline, “White House Gives
Up Civilian Court Plan.” But what does the reversal mean?

For one thing, it means there is likely to be far less
reportage and publicity than would have been the case in federal criminal
court, which normally accommodates a far larger audience. Even plain folks like
you and me can go and watch. (In 2009, I attended a U.S. Court of Appeals
hearing in D.C. that reversed an earlier decision to release 17 innocent Uighur
detainees into the United States from Guantanamo.)

Reduced public access to statements made by the 9/11
defendants was one of the specific reasons cited by Sen. Joe Lieberman and
other members of Congress for blocking a federal criminal trial.

"Putting Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in a public courtroom
in full view of the public gives him a better platform than any member of al
Qaeda has been given to recruit new members," Lieberman
said in February, successfully arguing that funds should be denied for holding
such a trial.

In other words, Lieberman wanted to prevent Khalid Sheikh
Mohammed and his co-defendants from having an opportunity to explain their
actions in a way that the U.S. and world public would get to hear.

With the case handled by a much more tightly controlled
military tribunal, the defendants are even surer to be denied that public
“platform.”

Even if Mohammed somehow could seize an opportunity,
before sentencing, to explain what drove him to conduct the attacks of 9/11,
his comments would likely fall like the proverbial tree in the forest.There
might actually be a few journalists within earshot able to listen and report.But willing?

Favored journalists in attendance would be unlikely to
provoke their military hosts or their editors back home by passing along to the
readers any inconvenient motives that the defendant might express.

The
Guantanamo locale affords the government other distinct advantages. In addition
to the fewer attendees, there can be even tighter handling of secrets and the
“CLASSIFIED” stamp can be used virtually at will. Transcripts
can be heavily censored — all with very little scrutiny.

The
government also can select the attendees. In the past, military officials at
Guantanamo have cherry-picked — and blacklisted — journalists, depending
largely on how obediently they have behaved during earlier cases.

These
restrictions — and the choice of Guantanamo — are abhorrent to human rights
advocates here and abroad. Neocons, though, can breathe easier, since they are
reasonably assured of protection against any loud complaints from Khalid Sheikh
Mohammed et al. about “U.S. foreign policy favoring Israel.”

Still, the tribunal approach may further delay justice in
the 9/11 cases, since the untested tribunal rules will likely be subjected to
many more legal challenges than would be the case in the well-worn rules of
criminal courts.

ACLU director Anthony Romero has noted that the military
commission system is “rife with constitutional and procedural problems,” adding
that the Attorney General’s “flip-flop is devastating to the rule of
law.”

The
Constitution on Life Support

The most
serious casualty appears to be the Constitution of the United States, given the
dubious fairness of the military commissions and the noxious precedent set by
the administration’s reversal. It is possible that some future president might
expand their coverage to apply to anyone who is deemed to lend any form of
support to “terrorists,” such as perhaps leaking U.S. government secrets.

Kristen Breitweiser, a 9/11 widow and an attorney, wrote
that she was given all of two hours “advance notice” regarding the Justice
Department’s decision to not prosecute the remaining alleged 9/11 conspirators
in an open court of law.

She asked that we all ponder what this decision says about
President Barack Obama, the Justice Department, and the United States of
America. She provided her own thoughts:

“As for
the Department of Justice, it shows their inability to prosecute individuals
who are responsible for the death of 3,000 people on the morning of 9/11.
Apparently our Constitution and judicial system -- two of the very cornerstones
that make America so great and used to set such a shining example to the rest
of the world -- are not adequately set up to respond to or deal with the
aftermath of terrorism.

“To me, this is a startling and dismal acknowledgment
that perhaps Osama Bin Laden did, in fact, win on the morning of 9/11. And
chillingly, I wonder whether it wasn't just the steel towers that were brought
down and incinerated on 9/11, but the yellowed pages of our U.S. Constitution,
as well.”

Ray McGovern works with Tell
the Word, a publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in
inner-city Washington. He served as a CIA analyst for 27 years and is
co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).

,I will do you-tube video's a soon as I get the equipment an transportation.,,

As I was in jc market in toledo oregon.Saturday the 15th of September 2012
an a woman in the Aile , I told her about the devils spying on you right now.stopsmartmeters.org - Cached on her business,, and home.

As I was in jc market in toledo oregon.Saturday the 15th of September 2012
an a woman in the Aile , I told her about the stopsmartmeters.org - Cached on her business,, and home.
She said she did not care because she had nothing to hide.
I
can not believe she would give up her grandchildren freedoms, give all
her years of work up and here freedom if
she dose not comply in
commercial codes of statute .This includes state statute laws by oregon
senate and
house members of england I mean the
church,http://www.patriotnetwork.info/Citizens_rule_book.htm
God almighty gave you the republicRepublic vs Democracy - YouTube

Our system of government was never intended to be a democracy. Although many believe that we live in one,
they have never been asked to vote on the www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFXuGIpsdE0 - Cached and the garden of eden the 10 commandments and the constitution
separating from commerce contracts of church
( the devil}or anther wards
in my opinion of constitutional born rights under freespeach,.... As I
have ask and even have
put in federal freedom of information and state
of oregon freedom of legal Americans asking request of our taxes that I
have been denied. With great respect to Arron Russofreedomtofascism.com ,, Wheres the constitutional and commune law and 10 commandments of our two or more generations legal American republic soil only legal
Americans who have been forced and illegally convected Unwilling | Define Unwilling at Dictionary.com,,How to get a player to signa contract?,Contract - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contracts,,,Crime - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Overview|Etymology|Definition|CriminalizationFor other uses, seeCrime ... violates the law, not every violation of the law counts as a crime; for example: breaches of contract ... Legal and not punishable crime are all ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimes - Cached

to sign over, Its a crime i.

I heard disturbing news today that MountAngelOktoberfest - Home oktoberfest.org - Cached
Has
a town party to steal from there residents on American soil of there
constitutional born rights, locals should be protected driven home
because they pay the towns illegal property taxes,Walter Burien - Guests - Coast to Coast AMA commodity trading advisor for 15 years, Mr. Walter Burien is not afraid of large ... writer Jessica Maxwell discussed her paranormal journey, ... More » Host: GeorgeNoorywww.coasttocoastam.com/guest/burien-walter/43097 - Cached taken by racketeering, fraud,Conclusion | History of Forensic Psychology,
thief of services from the legal American two or more generations
residents of said town, get no sevice from the elected and public
employees for there forced taxes,.
LEGALLY KNOW YOU STRWAMAN MAN
www.nomoretyranny.org/strawman.htm

UNDERSTAND HOW FOLKS TRY TO TELL YOUen.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wizard_of_Oz_ (1939_film)
The Second Coming | Revelation 17 Reveals It is Only a Few Years Away!

Praise The Lord And Pass The Ammunition
Http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lel2xvs4rg8&feature=youtube_gdata_player
- Video Results
Play VideoPraise The Lord And Pass The Ammunition
[Video w/Lyrics] Play Videopraise the lord and pass the ammunition Play
VideoSerj Tankian - Praise The Lord and Pass The Ammunition

Small community sets an example for quality education | The ...
Ed Johnston. Citizen. Toledo, Oregon. Testifies in favor of the bill.
... Says that perhaps Mr. Johnston's problems with his school district
require local ...
www.federalwaynews.net/2010/09/12/news/small-community... - Cached

In
2005 I also arrested for going to A mandatory reporting class for An
most godly man State senator Gery George to video tape the class so the
senate could see how the class were taught,,As I was arrested my vehicle
impounded my weapon's sized against my will,

paying hundreds of
dollars( Remember I'm disabled first By liberty northwest insurance
company Aug 1990 for my neck and closed head injuries for commercial
industry, (Lars has a file on this}, Also Frank Landry was Arrested for
some type of taxes he did not pay,

Oregon
TrackersWho
is behind Screening Children? What do concerned citizens say about the
way the City of Toledo is managed? Mandatory Drug Testing - Judges and
Police Officersoregontrackers.com - Cached

I
tried An 2008 sunday march 3 nepwort attempted to beat me to death or
one hell of a warning ,I was on lars larson freespeach friday on the
issue They blow five more dices and crushed my lower back on
file,publicly known.

Keep it going lars,

Petition for Subsistence Fish Fees - Oregon Trackers
PETITION.
NO NEW FISH OR WILDLIFE TAGS / NO INCREASED TAG FEES. 1. We, the
undersigned, believe that the most recent announced increases in fees
for fish and ...oregontrackers.com/FishFees.html - Cached

Also
understand thous who our in contracts for there employment and
understand what they have stated and forgive them for what they don't
know

Peace an god bless the
united states constitution and the oath I took three times. to the
constitution of the united states of America, PLEASE Get your country
back the pen in mightier then the sward.

Also
ask where the constitutional law in to pay property and any taxes when
As I went to jail and get convicted for calling 911, When my house was
entered and more of my medical an cases were stolen of said crimes to
an legally born american.,,

Are you a
REAL AMERICAN!
Two or more generations born in the USA

Do you believe in your rights?
Take the test her,,

http://oregontrackers.com/Americans%20Freedom.html

Strawman account Rev edward johnston As on file in court july 18th 2012.
As he said who care on recorded if I violated you rights, I better be there lincon county.
Case
no# 120600.As the DA was severed the 2006 inspectors general report,
court of apeaills, An the Oregon State Attorneys office were served,
A longtime judge of character - The News Guard: News
Charles Littlehales remembers the cold day in December 1970 when, as a 28-year-old district
attorney with less than one month on the job, he stepped out on to his
...www.thenewsguard.com/news/article_ 51b3f9e6-f461-11e0-a... - Cached
As
I in 2008 put the da Bernice Barnett on public trail for destroying my
family for personal and finical gain against one legal Americans birth
certificate, As she wonted to be passed judge littlehales {{, this is on
senate and house hearings and public hearings}} ,, the depo bay beacon
news paper an others 2008,
www.oregontrackers.com

Peace And god bless protect the Constitution and the 10 commandments,
Its up to you,,
I'm disabled an only wont what is mine ,
((((As
some know the statement forgiveness,understanding and learning
forgiveness said the lord or as I believe vengeance is mine sayest the
lord as I have been aware of, or is God and mother earth coming, }} I
sure don't wont to see that mother earth of nature destruction or man
made, In my opinion and god gave me an you freespeach and if you don't
like it turn the channel,,
I forgave all those who destroyed my
family, But dose not mean I have anything to do with you..Its up to man
the human to forgive, An god all ready for gave you, I my personal
opinion its time for the healing on mother earth, stop giving our public
lands away for for personal gain, As I have testified at the public
hearings save what GOD gave you FREE WATER,,AIR, AN SUBSISTENCE FOOD AND
PUBLIC LAND GATHERING OF YOUR FOOD ON GODS ALMIGHTY S LAND ,,
Again thank the only one god Almighty that I pray too,
LEGALLY
TO MY UNDERSTAND MY BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS A PATENTED NUMBER THAT THE
SYSTEMS OF COMMERCIAL GAIN USES,, PLEASE CORRECT MY IF I'M WRONG LARS.
SINCERELY STRAWMAN ACCOUNT REVEREND EDWARD MALONE JOHNSTON II
WWW.OREGONTRACKERS.COM..
IN
GODS NAME STOP SIGNING YOUR RIGHTS TO COMMERCE YOU HAVE ELECTED AND
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES WHO OUR SAPOSTO HONER THEIR OATH OF OFFICE TO THE
CONSTITUTIONAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
SOVEREIGNTY OR SLAVERY

Know your strawman Account is your original birth certificate true fact,are you owned by England,, or you a real American, Labor is the only legal way of employment,,

Know your strawman Account were is your original birth certificate, originally issued in 1878 . After the
civil war its a document to the free the legal constitutional color Americans from slavery. to comply with the 14th amendment of the
constitution of the united states
of america, From 18 USC Chapter306 - TRANSFER TO OR FROM FOREIGN COUNTRIES. united states is a
corporation code title 3002 (15) (A) a federal corporation} (B) an
agency department commission, board,or other entity of the united states
Or} (C) an instrumentality} Originally to comply with the fourteenth
amendment of the Untied states constitutional and commune laws, Not the
corporation, to honer your individual States sovereignty ( Example Oregon's
Treaty of 1846 from the British Government, Your sovereignty to travel
American soil The Right to Travel vs Driver'sLicense Scam - APFN also All the Navigable Waters of the State shall be Common Highways and Forever Free"publicriversforever.org, Subsidence hunting and fishing food gathering from public
lands,RS-2477Rights of Way | BlueRibbon Coalition with out paying the king or
Queen of England, Elected and public employees or its courts, Treaty's of your state sovereignty sign by our for-fathers)

1913 Federal Reserve Act of the British government sign by Pres Woodrow Wilson Allowed the united states,county,city
corporation to create an start borrowing for building developed and employees
of its unions member's debt of employment, Prier to this the Constitution an legal Americans of the untied states
is not in debt or is in debt,. Only Legal Americans our the stock holders of the united states,county's and city's.WoodrowWilson Quote - Liberty Quotes Blog... Act in 1913 ... banking trust in misleading the American people in 1913... ... WoodrowWilson (1856-1924), 28th President of the United States, Excerpt from 1912 campaign speech ...
quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Woodrow.Wilson.Quote.51CE - Cached

This created the 1929 depression from said borrowing for the
Federal,State, county and city's corporations employes and of progress
of development and debt of employment .
Is allowing
conspiracy,racketeering ,clusion,Extortion, of legal Americans, you did
not build your business if your are taking debt to your strawman
account.
Also to my understanding Constitutional law, states who signs for any debt
is liable, one is not liable for anthers humans debts..Unless you sign for
it or agree for debt by a yes vote (in the democracy)..The TenMile Square | TenMile SquareThe TenMile Square. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the UnitedStates' Constitution declares that ... of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States corporation.www.tenmilesquare.com/thetenmilesquare - Cached

Emergency Banking relief act march 9 1933 (www.nomoretyranny.org/strawman.htm)
Federal Reserve becomes the Government who Created the artificial
person for their debt creation, British Maritime law and uniformed
commercial codes That has been created by elected employes and
corporations members. . your birth certificate is a stock on the
new york exchanged As collateral loans ,www.health.ny.gov/vital_records/birth.htm

1997 Americans become human capital again,(Executive order 13037 sign
march 3 1997 by Pres Clinton made you a slave of the corruption of the
British government Democracy, Clear Violation of the fourteenth
Amendment )The Social Security , ( The united states of America
corporation order 1997, No 1778, Giving your social security payments to
England}, ( The Act of 1871 and presidential executive order 12803..as
our Constitutional laws clear state no foreign Government can tell
sovereigns how to live read your state Constitutions The Federal Zone: Chapter 11: Sovereignty - Supreme Law Firm

... Noforeign power or lawcan ... clear in its various definitions of "government": ... Law of our Land, the Constitution for the United States of
America. SovereignState ...www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/ chaptr11.htm - Cached

The most powerful court is the supreme court of Pennsylvania is the
keystone state of the corporation or constitutional laws (42Pa.C.S.A
502)(u.s. v. strang,253 us 491, lewis v. US,680 F.2nd, 1239)Information JordanMaxwell | Esoteric Scholar
Britten is owned by the Vatican(Treaty of 1213}, including Romans
13 international
bible.Romans 13 NIV - Submission to Governing Authorities - Bible,Treatyof 1213 - The Beginning of the Lie | Truth Control

On October 3, 1213, by treaty, King John ratified his ... Fathers") whom were controlled by the Treatyof 1213, wherein the Vatican ... Besides the Pope owned England and how ...www.truthcontrol.com/articles/treaty-1213-beginning-lie - Cached

Please look at the an support your republic YouTube - Republic vs Democracy
and www.OathKeepers.org.

As A British subject of the Democrats or democracy Clearly stated You
did
not build your own business if your had elected and public
employment,contracts advertizing,our other income from the British
Government ,contacts of federal state,
county,city, , when they spend your strawman account in name of your
business and your Slavery or
enslavement,Slavery - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Etymology|

Types|

History|

Present day

However, Pope Paul III forbade enslavement of the native Americans in 1537 in his ... the 200th anniversary of the Abolition of the slave trade in the United Kingdom...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery - Cached

Subject: YALE

http://www.yalelawjournal.org/images/pdfs/795.pdf
Our For-Fathers who wrote your constitutional laws Separation us for
church and state. .Gave you the garden of Eden,, Free Air.,
Water.,subsistence food gathering rights,and land to live, Called YOUR republic.

DNA programs our to eliminate all legal Americans of the family's bloodlines constitutional born rights,

god almighty gave you the 10 commandments and the constitution of the united sate of America

anther words the garden of Eden, Free air,water,food land, freedom to walk on gods land with

out the embarrassment or harassment of your elected and public employees.

State Rights
| Treaties Do Not Supersede the Constitution
1) Treaties do not override the U.S. Constitution. 2) Treatiescannot amend the Constitution. And last, 3) A treaty can be nullified by a statute passed by the U.S ...www.sweetliberty.org/issues/staterights/treaties.htm - Cached

CPS of OREGON, SenGeorge Speaks out - YouTubeSenatorGaryGeorge explains the ills and evils of a Child Protective Services "plan" and bill
proposed to monitor EVERY family in Oregon via the school ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4Z-kOLbSg0 - Cached.Play
Video

Small
community sets an example for quality education | The ...
EdJohnston. Citizen. Toledo, Oregon. Testifies in ... of Senator Gary George for EdwardJohnston) -- Relating to school surveys. ... The campaign was led by Oregon
School ...www.federalwaynews.net/2010/09/12/news/ small-community... - Cached

Toledo police officers' use of force leaves town divided ...
Toledo police
officers' use of force leaves town ... who complained at the meeting, Wrubel and EdJohnston ... National survey suggests racial disparity in police ...www.thefreelibrary.com/ Toledo+police+officers'+use+of... - Cached

YOUR OUR THE GOVERNMENT IF YOUR AN REAL CONSTITUTIONAL AMERICAN,

TO TRAVEL IS A RIGHT, YOU DO NOT NEED A BRITISH GOVERNMENT GRANTED "PRIVILEGE" THAT'S RIGHT THE DEMARCATE OR DEMOCRACY IS IT THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT,

Are you a
REAL AMERICAN!
Two or more generations born in the USA

Do you believe in your rights?
Take the test here

History of the Bible (Full Documentary)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqarwCKiIe8&feature=related

2012 were all dead or in a Concentration camp. Police State 2012 NDAA has passed. NO NWO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpOgdKntS6I&feature=related

Gifts can be mail to 1540 nye st toledo oregon 97391-9998
for the disabled who or denied medical like myself,.
www.oregontrackers.com

TO TRAVEL IS A RIGHT, YOU DO NOT NEED A GOVERNMENT GRANTED "PRIVILEGE"
you will need to make the hedder but SAY NOTHING BUT PROVE ME GUILTY
1. The issue is whether this Sovereign is required to obey the
provisions in the state statutes. It is the contention of this
Sovereign that because he is a Free and Natural Person who has given
up none of his "RIGHTS." That the legislative enactments and statutes
do not apply to him. It is also the contention of this Sovereign that
travels upon the streets or highways in any state of America by this
Sovereign is an unalienable "RIGHT." Being this, is not subject to
regulation or legislation by any "State" of the united States.
2. Let us first consider the contention of this Sovereign that
travels upon the streets or highways in America is a "RIGHT." Various
courts have ruled on this issue.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled:
2.1 The "RIGHT" to travel is a part of the liberty of which the
Citizen cannot be deprived without due process of the law under the
5th Amendment. (Emphasis added) See: Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116,
125
3. The Supreme Court of Wisconsin stated in 1909:
3.1 The term "public highway," in its broad popular sense, includes
toll roads -- any road which the public have a "RIGHT" to use even
conditionally, though in a strict legal sense it is restricted to
roads which are
wholly public. (Emphasis added). See: Weirich v.
State, 140 Wis. 98.
4. The Supreme Court of the State of Illinois ruled:
4.1 Even the legislature has no power to deny to a Citizen
the "RIGHT" to travel upon the highway and transport his property in
the ordinary course of his business or pleasure, through this "RIGHT"
might be regulated in accordance with the public interest and
convenience. (Emphasis added) See: Chicago Motor Coach v.
Chicago,
169 N.E. 22
5. "Regulated" here means traffic safety enforcement, stop lights,
sign, etc., NOT a privilege that requires permission, i.e.;
licensing, mandatory insurance, vehicle registration, etc..
6. PRIVILEGE OR RIGHT?
6.1 The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and
transportation is NOT a mere PRIVILEGE, but a "COMMON AND FUNDAMENTAL
RIGHT" of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be
deprived. (Emphasis added) See: Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago,
supra; Ligare v. Chicago, 28 N.E. 934; Boone v. Clark, 214 S.W. 607;
American Jurisprudence 1st Ed., Highways 163
6.2 Citizen's
"RIGHT" to travel upon public highways includes right
to use usual conveyances of time, including horse-drawn carriage, or
automobile, for ordinary purposes of life and business. (Emphasis
added) See: Thompson v. Smith (Chief of
Police), 154 S.E. 579, 580
6.3 The "RIGHT" of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and
to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by
automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or
permit at will, but a "COMMON RIGHT" which he has under the "RIGHT"
to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. (Emphasis added) See:
Thompson v. Smith, supra.
7. It could not be stated more conclusively that Sovereigns of the
states have a "RIGHT" to travel, without approval or restriction,
(license), and that this "RIGHT" is
protected under the U.S.
Constitution. After all, who do the roadways belong to anyway? The
People-At-Large. Here are other court decisions that expound the same
facts:
7.1 .... [T]he streets and highways belong to the public, for the use
of the public in the ordinary and customary manner. See: Hadfield v.
Lundin, 98 Wn. 657; 168 P. 516;
7.2 All those who travel upon, and transport their property upon, the
public highways, using the ordinary conveyance of today, and doing so
in the usual and ordinary course of life and business. See: Hadfield,
supra; State v. City of Spokane, 109 Wn. 360; 186 P. 864.
7.3 The "RIGHT" of the Citizen to travel upon the highways and to
transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and
business, differs radically and obviously from that of one who makes
the highways his place of business and uses it for private gain ....

Comment by Edward Johnston

Entered on: 4/8/2011 2:43:49 PM

Send this letter and ask all to send it to your senator and

house members
that our publicly employed by legal
Republic Americans to honor
their
ORIGINAL US Constitutional LAW oath or vote them out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVAhr4hZDJEThis is not
spam

I want to ask each
of

you to consider doing the
following
when you are

talking on the
phone to
any US customer service

representative that is

based in a foreign country (like India,Canada,China,
Philippines,England, any others that
was
missed ). I have done this twice and it
works! Any time you
call an 800 number (for a credit card, banking,

charter communications, health insurance, insurance, you
name it) and
you are transferred to a representative (like in
India), please consider
doing the following:

After
you connect and you realize that the customer service representative is
not from the USA (you can always ask if you are not sure about the
accent), please very politely (very politely - this is not about
trashing other cultures) say, "I'd like to speak to a customer service
representative in the United States of America." The rep might suggest
talking to his/her manager, but, again, politely say, "Thank you, but
I'd like to speak to a customer service representative in the USA ." YOU WILL BE IMMEDIATELY CONNECTED to a rep in the USA . It only takes
less than one minute to have your call re-directed to the USA . Tonight
when I got redirected to a USA rep, I asked again to make sure - and
yes, she was from Fort
Lauderdale our
were on American soil . you
can ask to call back to
be sure.

Imagine
if tomorrow, every US citizen who has to make such a call and then
requests a US rep, imagine how that would ultimately impact the number
of US jobs that would need to be created ASAP. Imagine what would
happen if every US citizen insisted on talking to only US phone reps
from this day on. If I tell 10 people to consider this and you tell 10
people to consider doing this - see what I mean...it becomes an exercise
in viral marketing 101. Remember
- the goal here is to restore jobs back here at home - not to be abrupt
or rude to a foreign phone rep. If you agree, please tell 10 people you
know and tell them to tell 10 people they know....etc...etc...
Sad but all too true!!!!!

Now you know what is wrong with this
country…HIGH SCHOOL -- 1957 vs. 2009,,
This is the change of
the voters

<<<SEE WHAT Democracy IS and has done>>>

Now
you know what is wrong with the
country…

http://constitution.org/fed/federa48.htm

HIGH
SCHOOL -- 1957 vs.
2009

Scenario
1:

Jack goes quail
hunting before school and then pulls into the school parking lot with
his shotgun in his truck's gun rack.

1957
- Vice Principal comes over, looks
at Jack's shotgun, goes to his car and gets his shotgun to show
Jack.

2009
- School goes into lockdown, FBI
called, Jack hauled off to jail and never sees his truck or gun again.
Counselors called in for traumatized students and
teachers.

Scenario
2:

Johnny and Mark
get into a fist fight after school. 1957
- Crowd
gathers.
Mark
wins.. Johnny and Mark shake hands and end up
buddies.

2009
- Police called
and SWAT
team arrives -- they arrest
both Johnny and Mark. They are both charged with assault and both
expelled even though Johnny started
it.

Scenario
3:

Jeffrey will
not sit still in class, he disrupts other
students. 1957
- Jeffrey sent to the Principal's office and given a
good paddling by the Principal. He then returns to class, sits still and
does not disrupt class again.

2009 - Jeffrey is given huge
doses of Ritalin. He becomes a zombie. He is then tested for ADD. The
school gets extra money from the state because Jeffrey has a
disability.

Scenario
4:

Billy breaks a
window in his neighbor's car and his Dad gives him a whipping with his
belt..

1957
- Billy is more careful next time, grows up normal, goes
to college and becomes a successful businessman.

2009 - Billy's dad is arrested
for child abuse. Billy is removed to foster care and joins a gang. The
state psychologist is told by Billy's sister that she remembers being
abused herself and their dad goes to prison. Billy's mom has an
affair with the psychologist.

Scenario
5: Mark
gets a
headache and takes some aspirin to
school.

1957 - Mark
shares his aspirin with the Principal out on the smoking
dock.

2009- The police
are called
and
Mark is expelled from school for drug violations. His car is then
searched for drugs and weapons.

Scenario
6:

Pedro fails
high school English.

1957 - Pedro
goes to summer
school, passes English and goes to
college.

2009 -
Pedro's cause is taken up by state. Newspaper articles appear nationally
explaining that teaching English as a requirement for graduation is
racist. ACLU files class action lawsuit against the state school system
and Pedro's English
teacher. English is then banned from core curriculum. Pedro
is given his diploma anyway but ends up mowing lawns for a living
because he cannot speak English.

Scenario
7:

Johnny takes
apart leftover firecrackers from the Fourth of
July, puts them in a model airplane paint
bottle and blows up a red ant bed. 1957
- Ants
die.

2009 - ATF,
Homeland
Security and the
FBI are all called. Johnny is charged with domestic terrorism. The FBI
investigates his parents -- and all siblings are removed from their home
and all computers are confiscated.
Johnny's dad is placed on a terror
watch list and is never allowed to fly or buy a gun
again.

Take Back YourStrawman
Take Back YourStrawman. UCC-1-Uniform Commercial Code-Take back yourStrawman. ... There's something else you should know: Everything, since June 1933, operates in ...educationcenter2000.com/take_back_your_strawman.html - Cached

Scenario
8:

Wally falls
while running during recess and scrapes his knee. He is found crying by
his teacher, Nancy. Nancy hugs him to comfort
him.

1957
- In a short time, Wally feels better and goes on
playing.

2009
-Nancy is accused of being a sexual predator and loses her job. She faces
3 years in State Prison... Wally undergoes 5 years of
therapy.

British Democrats and Selected Elected and public employees unions paid
for
by Legal
Americans/
SEND ALL ILLEGALS IS THE ONLY
WAYS TO SAVE THE COUNTRY
CALLED THE USA AND YOUR
EMPLOYMENT,,PLEASE TAKE THE
BLINDERS
OFF

Watch the truth,, About The Illegal MAN OBAMA.

Has Mr Obama committed treason what do you think.

ObamaAdmits: “I am Not an American Citizen. I came from ...
Watch and hear Obama admit he is not an American citizen. Better share this now, it’s likely
to be pulled off You Tube as fast as the liberal minions can get it ...freedomtroopers.org/2010/07/06/obama-admits-i-am-not-an... - Cached

VIDEO
AND AUDIO TAPE ALL ELECTED AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEES REMEMBER THAT YOU ARE
THE EMPLOYER,,We the none union member our the Government,
We have
nothing to gain for DEBT.

:"The Obama
administration’s decision to use a military tribunal rather than a federal
criminal court to try alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four
others means the real motives behind the 9/11 attacks may remain obscure."

No, it means the motives WILL remain obscure, that's the whole point, the criminals inside our own government who made 9/11 happen will not have any disturbing attention brought to them or their lies.

Comment by America First

Entered on: 4/7/2011 8:08:14 AM

The more likely scenario is that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is a patsy that was tortured into confessing anything and everything. Most of the available evidence points to Israel planning and orchestrating the attacks THEMSELVES to get the west to fight it's enemies in the middle-east.