Monthly Archives: May 2012

Post navigation

These dictators were keeping the world perfectly in peace. For 30 years Mubarak ruled in Egypt, kept the fascists of the Muslim Brotherhood from taking power by running in elections (you know their aim and motto, one election, one time) and Mubarak also kept the peace going with Israel. Gadhafi was actually on the side of the US and Britain against Al Qaida terrorists. Similarly with Ben Ali and Gaghbo and a dozen others. They did not change. They remained loyal to the agreement with the US to fight Al Qaeda. It was the US, Britain and France who changed. Just as Reagan did in Afghanistan they joined the Islamist Fascists.

When representatives of a system cannot keep their word that signifies the deep degeneration of that system.

The situation now in Syria is caused completely by these Big Powers, that is US, France and Britain.

If Assad is overthrown then the millions of Alawites and other millions of Christians will be massacred by the Jihad. Those not massacred by the Jihad will be enslaved.

Imagine then our surprise on www.4international.me when supposed friends of Israel like Barry Rubin, rather than being a guide to the world in the field of morality, are actually refusing to defend Assad, thus defend the minority Alawites and Christians.

As in all of these countries there is a struggle going on against Islam fundamentalists. Assad is clearly fighting for his life and the life of his family. But he is the figurehead for the Alawites and Christians. That latter fact is the ONLY reason he has survived for so long against such odds. The Alawites and Christians do not want to be massacred or have to flee. Jews like Rubin should understand this. I rate Rubin to be one of the big betrayers (of the Jewish tradition) of all time. he does not mean to be or set out to be, but that is what he is.

Now these policies of Obama, of Cameron and Sarkozy (past) have even mor implications.

Consider this:

Our sources learn that, in one of the conversations between the two presidents, Obama commented: “If only one barrel of anthrax reaches the hands of a Caucasian terrorist group, Russian will face its greatest terrorist threat in its history. Millions of Russians may perish.”It was clear from this comment that Assad’s WMD are not stored as warheads, bombs or shells but kept in large barrels or kegs in six underground bunkers, holding Sarin (GB), Tabun (GA) and VX nerve gases, some four kinds of mustard gas and anthrax. The storage silos are spread out among Al Safir, the main Syrian missile base in the north; Cerin, a biological research center on the Mediterranean shore; military facilities at Hama and Homs; the Syrian naval base leased to the Russians at Latakia; and Palmyra, on the highway between Homs and Aleppo.

I REPEAT

MILLIONS OF RUSSIANS MAY PERISH (As result of Al Qaida winning over Assad).

And that was just Obama trying to get the point home to Putin. repeat the scenario in Britain, France, Spain (through carriers from Morocco wide open), the US itself with its crop of jihadists sprouting up every day, and the world under capitalism faces destruction and death of hundreds of millions.

But the Reverend Dave, a evangelical Elim Pentecostal Minister active on Talk Radio Europe, called for “something needs to be done” because of the recent massacre of children. Without saying what it is needs to be done.

(RUBIN HAS A NEW ARTICLE UP ON SYRIA BEING CARRIED WIDELY. IN THIS ARTICLE RUBIN REFUSES TO DEFEND ASSAD AND DEFEND THE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY OF SYRIA, BOTH AGAINST THE SHARIA OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD. BY A STRANGE TWIST OF FATE THIS RESPECTED JEWISH WRITER BUT WHO WE ON WWW.4INTERNATIONAL.ME DO NOT RESPECT ONE BIT HAD BECOME A BIG ALLY OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD)

Barry Rubin ranks up there as one of the greatest enemies of the Jews, even though most American Jews give him a pass, and many Jews in Israel do so also because they are influenced by America.

The reality facing Jews today whether they accept it now or not is:Jewish leaders in America and Britain who have their agents in Israel are the big danger.

Rubin is in reality a political imbecile and is totally devious. the reason I say the latter, and that his deviousness takes precedent over his imbecility, is that he leaves out a factor which he knows of very well.

That is that Assad is fighting the war on behalf of secularism and against the combined efforts of Sharia and Wester Capitalist Governments.

Notice I said “combined”.This is indeed an Alliance of Interests.

We saw this first of all in Yugoslavia although it was also there in the CIA involvement with Suharto in Indonesia.

there is a very deep crisis in capitalism which surpasses the crisis of 1929 (because capitalism is much older) and this crisis has driven all of the capitalist governmental interests to seek an alliance with Islam.

It is in vain that Spencer or Geller complain about this. The underlying material forces are much stronger. There is to be no going back on this Alliance. There is a difference between Romney and Obama. Obama is enthusiastic about this Alliance. Romney is not enthusiastic but will also do it anyway.

This is because by the time Romney takes over the crisis will have moved on. It is mostly a crisis of credit. There is trillions of credit (paper money and increasing) flooding the system.

Season economists in Britain like the very respected Roger Bruton spit on the efforts to rescue the euro, but the euro is inseparable from the dollar.

On this issue of Assad. None of us really like Assad one bit because of the way he carried on the Arab war against Israel while his grandfather knew very well the real value of Israel. But things change and what has chamged with all of these Arab leaders like Ben Ali, Mubarak and Gadhafi, is that they were forced to become while not total secularists certainly in the fight against Sharia Law.

That is very fundamental. That is why Gadhafi HAD to be defended. The issue of Lockerbie was a total distraction especially since the father of a girl killed was certain that libya was not involved.

I listened to a man called David on a radio station yesterday and he played a clip on the massacre, then he related about the birth of his daughter a few months ago, then he said but that does nopt mean that if you do not have children you would not understand, you see he is a Christian and Christians like to cover all bases. But because of the images of the massacre of children he said “something needs to be done”. But he did not state out clearly that that something was to remove Assad by war, which is the position of the French. “Something needs to be done” was also the basis on which many Germans supported Hitler.

This Assad issue is very dangerous for the Jews. I have no time at all for Rubin. I see people like Rubin in this article betraying the 2000 year old Christian community in Syria and handing them over to the Sharia. (By the way Pamela has no clear position of defence of Assad and is not different from what I understand to Rubin)

I have a little doggie friend and he is very aware of what happens in and around our home. But it does take him a while to work new things out. I place him far ahead of Rubin. As for the comparative intelligence of my cat and Rubin, well she would spit in disgust if I was to call barry Rubin intelligent

I SUSPECT VERY STRONGLY THAT THE MASSACRE OF CHILDREN BEING REPORTED BY THE BBC THIS MORNING IN SYRIA IS PHONY, A SET-UP.

I take that as given. Every piece of news that comes across on the BBC my first presumption is always that it is false. This is the correct position for a socialist revolutionary to take.

On www.4international.me we stand in the most uncopmpromising way in defence of the Jews, in defence of Israel, that Israel must urgently strike the Iranian fascist regime and with Nuclear weapons if it is seen as necessary to defend Israel.

But we cannot forgive Jewish leaders who have not defended Gaghbo, Ben Ali, Mubarak and Gadhafi with everything that the Jews have got.

None of those leaders can be said to be friendly to Israel. That is not the point. The point being that they were also opposed to the Sharia Law in their countries, and as the policy of the US and Europe has become clearer to ujs, they were therefore opposed to the Sharia/US Alliance.

In political life you do not have to be a friend of somebody to defend them.

The whole history of the last two decades of the life of Trotsky was that he sought to make every alliance against Hitler and Mussolini.

But the present Sharia in alliance with Obama and the EU leaders is a worse threat to the world than even the Nazis were.

That is why I cannot forgive the take by debka on this so-called massacre, and I cannot forgive Belman of Israpundit for not standing on his hind legs like a real man and warniong about how similar this looks to the conspiraciers against the Serbs.

I follow with 2 items, first my challenge to Belman on Israpundit this morning and secondly the atrocious debka take on the massacre. And on Assad.

1. MY CHALLENGE TO ISRAPUNDIT AND TED BELMAN THIS VERY MORNING

It is not at all that the Jews are gullible. It is that the Jewish leaders, especially in America, have been conditioned by their own (American) ruling class with its great powers of persuasion (for example Ted Belman of this Israpundit conditioned through his years as a LAWYER, to follow whatever garbage the elites throw at the population through the Media.

I was not there. I cannot say what happened.

However I have listened to the BBC and the reporting on this “massacre” follows the pattern of the reporting of the Srebrenica “massacre”.

Except that they have become more bold since 1995 because then they did not report a massacre until 2 months after the event.

The Irish times has reported on Srebrenica many hundreds of times since 1995 but in the first 2 months there was no mention at all of a massacre.

Now they can put this type of news story in circulation very fast and nobody bats an eyelid.

I can handle all of that but what I cannot handle is Jewish leaders like Belman who toe the line like any other gullible Media dimwit.

The reason they can put it out so fast is largely due to people like Belman and it is worse in his case because he has had a chance to understand how the Media in Yugoslavia worked.

An alternative theory, with the merest tiny bit of reflection, and I am no expert at all, but the whole point is I do not need great expertise, I just need to reflect back on Yugoslavia, on Qana, on Jenin, on El Dura etc..

1. Who benefits? Assad does not benefit at all because he is interested in keeping the shaky Russians on board with him.2. Clearly benefit are those who call for HUMANITARIAN Intervention such as the CIA, the sections around Obama like Rice who are for Humanitarian Interventions everywhere, Joe Lieberman…and Ted Belman? But why the latter?

An alternative theory thinking only of the practicals of this specific massacre story:

We know that Al Qaeda is there and we know their ruthlessness.

We know the CIA and SAS are there and they would do anything for political global strategy.

We know that Al Jazeera and Kuwait are there and we saw just how ruthless they were in Libya in murdering not a hundred but tens of thousands of black Africans.

We have experience of the Qana affair where the same Islamists raided the nearby morgues in order to locate the very bodies that they later had actors dig or pull out of the rubble, in the case on one child pulled out time after time. THESE TYPES WOULD DO ANYTHING. THAT IS THE WHOLE ESSENCE OF THE EXPOSURES BY SPENCER ON JIHADWATCH AND BY PAMELA ON ATLAS SHRUGS.And again on the BbC this morning these Antisemites focus on CHILDREN.

A lady from Save the Children (note a lady to give the maternal touch) was calling for humanitarian intervention.

And Belman, a Jewish leader through Israpundit in America and Israel, and a man who networks with Eidelberg et al, falls for all of this.

This makes me think that the issue is Assad and Jewish leadership opportunism devoid of principle, you know sell your granny fro a penny.

Assad is in league with Hizbullah, Hamas and Iran. So Belman is quite incapable of calling for a defence of Assad from the forces of Empire/Sharia.Belman cannot act because he leaves out a fact I raised a year ago which is: defence of Assad does not mean lowering the guard against Assad by Israel.

Nothing to stop defending Assad. Nothing to stop Israel from striking against Assad if it needs to. But that entails seeing Israel as an independent force in the world.

THAT BELMAN AND HIS ILK IN THE Jewish ELITE CANNOT EVER DO

They have always and will always see Israel as an adjunct to the US which has brainwashed them.Nor does defence of Gaghbo, Ben Ali, Gadhafi or Mubarak ever stop Israel from hitting Iran with a Nuclear Weapon to save the Jews.

Only the www.4international.me can take these positions and only that organization can become the defender of the Jews in the long term consistent sense.

The wanton slaughter by Syrian forces of 92 confirmed victims, 32 of them children under ten, at the Homs village of Al-Houla Friday, May 25, was the most horrifying atrocity in the Middle East this week, but not the only one: In Sanaa, six days ago, al Qaeda’s suicide bombers, having penetrated Yemeni military ranks, detonated two tons of explosives at a parade rehearsal killing more than 100 soldiers and civilians and injuring 400.Yet, according to the New York Times, after 15 months of bloodshed, President Barack Obama is working on the Yemenbi model for a plan to push Bashar Assad out of office, while “leaving remnants of his government in place. The Yemeni model replaced President Ali Abdullah in Sanaa with his vice president Abdu Rabbu Mansour Hadi.Whereas US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton condemned Assad and his “cronies” for the al-Houla massacre, the “Yemen plan” would leave in place those very “cronies,” including Assad’s close relatives, who are responsible for massacres not only in al-Houla, but also in Homs, Hama, Idlib and Deraa, to name a few.According to the NYT, when Obama tested the idea with Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev at the Group-of-8 summit in Camp David last Saturday, May 19, the Russian prime minister raised the example of “Mubarak in a cage,” referring to Mubarak’s court appearance at his trial. Obama then “countered with Yemen, and the indication was, yes, this was something we could talk about.”This scrap of dialogue lifted the veil from a key aspect of Obama’s broader Middle East program and the role he has assigned Moscow for carrying it through. This role was first revealed exclusively by DEBKA-Net-Weekly 542 of May 25 which reported that the US president is acting to bring the Russians into a partnership for securing deals on the Iranian nuclear program and the Syrian crisis.So far, his venture has had two results:

1. The Iranian nuclear impasse and the outcome of the Syrian civil war have been more tightly integrated than ever before.2. Any deal reached by the US, Russia and Iran on the two issues would have to entail a carving-up of Middle East influence among those three powers.As for Israel’s role in the ongoing bargaining, we also disclosed in debkafile of May 19 that Israel’s Binyamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak had agreed to stand back for Barack Obama to put his interim deal with Iran to the test. Despite their reservations, they decided to go along with it after receiving assurances from the White House that Iranian violations would result in the immediate termination of negotiations and bring military action forward as the sole remaining option for stopping a nuclear Iran.

The US president promised to put his accord with Israel before the G-8 summit. And he did.But for now there is no deal although Israel, in effect, gave Obama six months’ grace to explore his diplomatic initiative with Vladimir Putin and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei before turning back to the military option.But as the days pass, major hurdles are piling up in the path of what some observers hail as Obama’s “Grand Bargain,” and others his “Grand Failure:” The Six-power talks with Iran have failed to persuade the ayatollahs to give up uranium enrichment up to weapons-grade; the world wants actions not words to halt the brutal massacres in Syria; rising bloodshed in Yemen continues to cripple the country. Obama’s hopes of a crisis-free six months for electioneering in peace look more and more like pipe-dreams.The bargaining with Tehran is likely to stay stalled because Iran’s leaders take Obama’s deal with Israel as a six-month respite from a military threat. So why should they hurry in May or even June to reach a compromise with America on its demand to stop 20 percent uranium enrichment?Bashar Assad and his army chiefs likewise feel US hands are tied by Obama’s hopes of a breakthrough with Iran and they can safely carry on with their “unspeakable crimes” for the next six months under the Iranian-Russian umbrella. Words however strong will not discourage him from sending tanks to crush every last opponent and their children.

And Israel, seeing the US president lurching from one bargaining position to another to keep his initiative afloat, shifts uncertainly in and out of its unwritten commitment to withhold military action against Iran until November.

None of the parties involved in granting Obama his six-month grace period, whether Vladimir Putin, Ali Khamenei, Binyamin Netanyahu or Bashar Assad, can be sure that he will in fact be returned to the Whie House in November. And even if he is, how much will be left of his Grand Bargain.

Netanyahu, Barak refuse to see US official

with negative report on Baghdad talks

DEBKAfileExclusive Report May 26, 2012, 10:25 AM (GMT+02:00)

State’s Wendy Sherman, senior US delegate to world power talks with Iran

The rupture between the US and Israel over Iran’s nuclear program widened further Friday, May 25 when Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak decided not to be available to hear the briefing brought to Jerusalem from Baghdad by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman who headed the US delegation to the Six Power talks. The report she delivered to National Security Adviser Yaakov Amidror and Foreign Ministry Director-General Rafi Barak was that no progress had been achieved in Baghdad due to Iran’s refusal to budge on its “right” to enrich uranium at low (3.5-5 percent) or high (20 percent) levels or shut down the Fordo nuclear plant near Qom.Although the participants agreed to reconvene in Moscow in three weeks, the Iranian delegation stressed there would be no progress until the US and the other five world powers (Britain, France, Russia, Germany and China) recognized Iran’s absolute “right” as a signatory of the Non-Proliferation Treaty to enrich uranium.

Meanwhile, every day spent on diplomacy is thoroughly exploited by Iran to zip ahead with its nuclear plans. The Vienna-based UN nuclear watchdog (IAEA)’s quarterly report released Friday reveals that since February Iran almost doubled its stockpile of more highly enriched uranium which is close to weapons grade from 73.4 to 145 kilograms.The centrifuges at the Fordo facility, built into the side of a mountain, rose to over 500 from 300 in the last report.

Using the IAEA figures, debkafile calculates that if Fordo goes on producing 23.9 kilograms of 20-percent enriched uranium per month, Iran will by the end of December have accumulated 336 kilograms of near-weapons quality uranium.The IAEA also reported that Iran’s stockpile of uranium enriched to less than 5 per cent grew to 6,232 kilograms from 5,451 reported in February.

Its inspectors recorded “the presence of particles” of 27 per cent-enriched uranium at Fordo. Iran maintained the particles were a result of “technical reasons beyond the operator’s control.”

The IAEA report was released a day after talks between Tehran and the six powers ended without progress.Iran’s senior delegate Saeed Jalili declared that his government would never accept the Washington-ruled distinction between two categories of nations – one permitted and the other forbidden to enrich uranium. He claimed this was against international treaties.

Friday, the Washington Post quoted Mohammad Hoseyn Moussavian of Princeton University as revealing that in 2004, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said, “I would resign if for any reason Iran is deprived of its rights to enrichment.”

Moussavian is presented as an Iranian academic visiting Princeton to lecture and write a book on the Iranian nuclear issue. debkafile reveals that he was the contact man in one of the direct, back-channel negotiations taking place in Paris between the White House and Khamenei. His words therefore were intended to carry weight as a reminder to Obama that the supreme leader, like the US president, intended to come out of their dialogue strengthened – not undermined. And therefore, for both their sakes, Washington must endorse Iran’s “right to enrichment.”Tehran presented a second ultimatum for the nuclear talks to continue: phased sanctions relief, starting with the postponement of the European Union’s oil embargo scheduled for July 1 until the end of negotiations and the reconnection of Iranian banks to the SWIFT international money transfer system.

The gap between Israel and the Obama administration widened in the course of Washington’s direct, secret give-and-take with Tehran. In early April, Defense Minister Barak reported that Israel offered some compromise on the enrichment issue. debkafile disclosed at the time that Israel had informed Washington of its approval of a “1,000 formula.” Iran would be permitted to activate 1,000 centrifuges for enrichment and keep 1,000 kilograms of 3.5-per cent enriched uranium.

The Netanyahu government backtracked when this concession was used by US officials as a lever for further accommodations with Iran.The direct US-Iran channel and the second round of Six Power talks with Iran have clearly left the standoff over Iran’s nuclear solidly in place: Iran stands by its right to enrich uranium up to weapons grade, the US stands by diplomacy, however hopeless, for resolving the controversy, while Israel demands a time limit for negotiations. Its military option was put back on the table for so long as Iran’s enrichment centrifuges continue spinning at top speed

www.4international.me is totally on the side of the Jews and Israel in this issue of Iranian Nuclear Bombs.

We say that the Iranian regime is as much antisemitic as was Hitler.

In fact there is a direct line. The man who led the Bosnian Muslims against Milosevic and Mladic was called Izetbegovic. His history goes back to the Holocaust. He was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood in Bosnia during the years of the Holocaust. We do not know how many members of the Muslim Brotherhood there were in Bosnia during the Holocaust, but we do know the name of one, that was Hajj Amin el Husseini, who was the chief organizer of the Holocaust in the Balkans. In other words joint membership of the pro-Hitler Muslim Brotherhood. They may have been the only two in Bosnia.

Move forward just a little, to the early 1990s, and Iran was working with the US State Department and the US Army and Air Force to airlift Nazi Arab Muslims into Bosnia to fight the Serbs. They carried out many beheadings, thus anticipating what happened to Daniel Pearl.

This was Jihad against the Serbs, with the direct help of the US ruling classes.

Now there is a Jihad against Israel and it takes the form of the Iranian Nuclear Bomb.

You can see an antisemite immediately. He or she will offer no interest in what Iran is getting up to in Fordo inside that mountain.

This apparent “naivety” and sometimes even impatience with the issue being raised has at its root Antisemitism.

Some of the worst offenders in this regard are those who claim to talk about defence of the Serbs re Srebrenica, like Harman and Peterson, while they are defending the Nazi Iranian regime and its bomb building AGAINST JEWS.

Of course, this is Antisemitic and Nazi because this bomb building in Iran has got only the one target and that target is Israel.

So what is the future?/ What to do?

The answer is that no step can be taken without putting into place the alternative leadership which has to be www.4international.me.

It is necessary to defend Mladic unconditionally. The Serbs had a full right to use whatever methods it decided to use. In the war against the Nazis by the freedom fighters opposed to the Nazis (The resistance) nobody has ever, i mean ever, criticised the methods of The Resistance to Hitler.

Same with the Serbs today. Same with the Jews of Israel today.

We on www.4international.me defend unconditionally each and every method od struggle which the Jews use in order to survive against these enemies.

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg defended his longstanding police commissioner last week after revelations about his role in a vicious anti-Muslim film widely shown to city police officers as part of “counterterrorism” training in 2010.

Muslim civil rights activists and their supporters gathered on the steps of City Hall on January 26 to demand that Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly and police spokesman Paul Browne resign. Kelly provided a lengthy interview for the film, The Third Jihad, which was screened for nearly 1,500 officers.

After a yearlong cover-up, Kelly was forced to admit that he cooperated with the makers of the film. While including a hollow claim that it does not accuse all Muslims, the movie argues that most Muslim-Americans are involved in a stealth campaign to promote terrorism.

The powerful movement of the Egyptian people that brought down Mubarak was therefore an enormous blow to US imperialism and its regional allies.

WSWS EXHIBIT 3 (part 2 of above which is part 1 in a 3 part series)

By the end of the 1990s, the Brotherhood began to fashion itself as a political party, issuing a draft manifesto and consistently outperformed the legal opposition parties in elections. In the 2005 elections, it was virtually the sole organised opposition party to Mubarak’s ruling National Democratic Party (NDP), winning 88 seats, about one fifth of the parliament. The government arrested thousands of its members, trying many in military courts. It amended the constitution to prevent independents from running for Parliament, making it impossible for the Brotherhood to stand in November 2010 elections characterised by massive fraud.

WSWS EXHIBIT 4

and part 3

or why the wsws is full of devious betrayal

The demands for social equality and genuine democratic rights can be won only through a conscious revolutionary struggle of workers and peasants against the junta and its defenders, from the right and nominal left. It means building a mass movement aimed at bringing a workers’ government to power.

To conduct this struggle, Egyptian workers need two things: an international socialist strategy and their own independent fighting organisations. The way forward lies in the fight to unite Egyptian workers and the rural poor with their brothers and sisters throughout the region in a combined struggle against capitalist exploitation and imperialist oppression, for the United Socialist States of the Middle East, as part of a struggle for world socialist revolution. This requires the building of the revolutionary leadership of the International Committee of the Fourth International.

This www.wsws.org is really reactionary. Look at what they have done. Do not bother to read the rest it is soooo boring

the first extract shows the wsws lining up with the likes of Rauf and against Jihadwatch and Atlas Shrugs. They are for CAIR and Hamas.

The second is a plain lie. Mubarak was not brought down by other than Obama. It was Obama who turfed Mubarak out. This was just the end of the US and Western Capitalist Governments aim to create Sharia states in the world.

Capitalism likes Sharia.

Sharia is used to discipline the masses of the poor and is a form of Fascism.

The one key thing about Mubarak is that he too, along with Ben Ali, Gaghbo, Mubarak and Gadhafi, all opposed Sharia. The US Government and all Western Governments, especially Europe, support the creation of Sharia states.

The only way to stop Sharia in Egypt was through Mubarak. Obama pulled the rug from under Obama. Obama fell. the Sharia takes over.

And the WSWS supported the taking down of Mubarak.

In the third extract above the wsws use this rhetoric about workers and poor peasants of Egypt etc., but the wsws has helped to remove Mubarak, who had long been the bulwark against the Muslim Brotherhood and Sharia.

Obama was always all for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. When he took power his first phone call was made known to be to Abbas, and his first meethjing was when he travelled to Cairo and insisted that the Muslim Brothnerhood be present at his conference.

That is the same Muslim Brotherhood whom Mubarak had kept out of political life.

Yet the wsws was all for (in the above extracts) the taking down of Mubarak through what they call “revolutions”

With “revolutions” like this which the wsws promote the working class anywhere does not have any chance.

The world in which I live is inhabited by really strange people (The Media) who are desparately trying to keep the ordinary folk from understanding what is happening (Reality)

Well the reality is that Israel is going to go to war with Iran and the reality also is that www.4international.me stands in the warlike and just tradition of Leon Trotsky and we will be the only ones on the left who will stand unconditionally with Israel.

Obama is sympathetic to Iran and to Islam. Some European leaders (Sarkozy was) were worried about Iran and the Nuclear Bomb, but Europe is in crisis and these leaders cannot focus. Also in everything the Europeans are deep down Antisemitic and they blame Jews subconsciously for Iran. So they hesitate in front of Iran.

Israel cannot hesitate. If it hesitates in front of Iran then Israel will be wiped out. Dirty Nuclear bombs can be let off. Iran will have the material and they will have the weapons to deliver (Arab suicide killers)

This is why in the end Israel and its leaders can take only so much bull shit from Obama. Obama does lie and if your whole people are threatened, especially the Jews, the lies after a time do not work.

And this is why when Ehud Barak spoke the following (In Hebrew but so there was no mistake had an English translation on hand) then this means that war on Iran from Israel is just so inevitable.

HIS WORDS WERE :

“There is no need to tell us what to do, and we have no reason to panic. Israel is very, very strong, but we do know that the Iranians are accomplished chess players and will try to achieve nuclear capabilities. Our position has not changed. The world must stop Iran from becoming nuclear. All options remain on the table.”

“The Srebrenica massacre charge is a slander that only has credibility because it has been presented so much and so often, with such powerful forces behind not, and because some Serbs and foreign intellectuals have — for whatever reasons — falsely admitted guilt on behalf of RS.”

AND OVER COMING WEEKS WE INTEND TO PROVE THIS. BUT WHY? WHY BOTHER? WHY IS THE WHOLE OF THE WORLD MEDIA LINING UP BEHIND THIS BIG LIE WHICH MAKES THE TRUTH SO DIFFICULT TO GET ACROSS?

IN FACT IF THE SREBRENICA BIG LIE STANDS THEN IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR SCIENCE TO STAND…THE FOLLOWING GETS TO THE HEART OF IT:

The issue of the destruction of Yugoslavia remains as yet a mystery.

The Serbs had fought with the Allies to defeat the Nazis. Had collective memory ended?

Leading in destroying their nation was their former allies, but those allies were now joined with precisely the Germans and Muslims, precisely those they had fought against together. What had happened?

On the one hand this was a terrible betrayal of trust, a moral issue.

But on the other it calls again into question the nature of the war against the Nazis especially in so far as the elites were concerned.

This also raises the issue of the war itself. It is a fact that Trotsky never gave his support to the war because he reasoned that it was an imperialist war, a war between the Imperialists.

I do not think that this meant that Trotsky would oppose war actions against the Nazis. After all Trotsky had called (IN 1933!) for the Red Army to act against Hitler.

But it WAS an imperialist war and this was demonstrated most clearly when the British, French and Americans were recruiting tens of thousands of top Nazis into their anti-communist movements even before the Jews were out of the death camps. They were recruiting the very killers of the Jews. So what was the talk about liberty etc. of Churchill all about!?

Yet if the “Desert Rats” who were British forces not defeated Rommel in North Africa then the Jews of Palestine would have been genocided in total since the Nazis under Gehlen, who was under Hajj Amin el Husseini and Himmler/Eichmann, were ready to move in.

Then again a little later the nephew of top Nazi Hajj Amin el Husseini, a man who became known as Yasser Arafat, was essentially recruited by the US and Europe, with the Norwegians to the front, to plan a new Holocaust of the Jews in the First and Second so-called Intifadas.

THIS was the context of the destruction of Yugoslavia.

On the surface it looked as if the likes of the Guardian had turned on their former ally, the Serbs, and were supporting the Nazis behind Izetbegovic.

But it was just more of the same.

The alliance against Hitler’s Nazis was thus opportunist. They had joined precisely those Nazis in 1945. So their betrayal of the Serbs who HAD fought the Nazis in the Second World War should not have been that big a surprise.

But it was and the Serb leaders did not fully understand that

The Yugoslavian crisis covers the whole of this historical period. It started in the 1980s. Her we are over 30 years later and Mladic is being tried by the very criminals of NATO whom we will prove in these pages over coming weeks were responsible (I am speaking here of the Alliance of western capitalism with Islam and Sharia which Bat yeor describes but does not correctly label)

We fight in solidarity with all who are defending Mladic.

But this is a discussion. There are many differences between the 4international and all others.

These points are worth making as we start to follow the Mladic issue:

THE CENTRAL ISSUE WAS AND IS THE TERMINAL CRISIS OF CAPITALISM

THE DRIVE BY CAPITALISM TO WORLD DICTATORSHIP

A WORLD WIDE PHENOPMENON…THE CAPITALIST SYSTEM HAS CREATED A WORLD UNIFIED ECONOMY

CANNOT SEPARATE YUGOSLAVIA AND THE CIA, FROM GADHAFI AND THE CIA, FROM MUBARAK AND THE CIA, ETC. ETC.

HOW DO THEY FIGHT? WHAT IS OVERALL STRATEGY OF THE ENEMY?

(WE MENTION HERE 3 ELEMENTS)

CORRUPTION OF THE “LEFT” (TO EXPAND ON LATER)

GRAND STRATEGY OF CAPITALISM IS ALLIANCE OF WESTERN CAPITALISM AND ISLAM

IN WHICH ANTISEMITISM (PALESTINISM) PLAYS A CENTRAL ROLE AS IT ALWAYS HAS

TO REPEAT AND EMPHASISE…THE SERBS WERE UNKNOWINGLY FIGHTING AGAINST THIS ALLIANCE

(THE ALLIANCE OF WESTERN GOVERNMENTS WITH ISLAM)

THUS IZETBEGOVIC WHO WAS IN ACTUALITY THE FASCIST, SHARIA LOVING, NAZI, AND NAZI FRIEND OF EL HUSSEINI, HAD TO BE PROMOTED AS A “GOOD GUY” BY THE SERVILE GUARDIAN-TYPE MEDIA)

AND THAT SET THE SCENE FOR THE ORGY OF LIES ABOUT YUGOSLAVIA STILL GOING STRONG.