Nobody else is going to save you but yourself-but how?
Read on.
I hold no copyright to any articles, save that:
1)You reproduce in entirety
2)Link to freedomguide.blogspot.com
3)Accredit authorship to J. Croft

FROM POPEHAT, VIA WRSA.ORG: JUST A FRIENDLY REMINDER PLEASE SHUT THE HELL UP!

It’s a dark and gloomy six in the morning. You’ve just gotten out of bed. You are fuzzy-headed, bleary-eyed, badly in need of coffee. You haven’t showered or dressed. You’re in your underwear, or pajamas.
Suddenly there’s a thunderous pounding on the door, and loud men are shouting something at you. Your heart lurches and the adrenaline jolts you. You open the door, and there is a team of FBI agents, guns prominently displayed in holsters, raid jackets open. They are large and aggressive and unfriendly. They tell you they have a search warrant for your home and push past you. Two of them grab you, bodily turn you around, and handcuff you. They’ll say later they had to do that to secure the scene and assure agent safety, and that you totally weren’t in custody or anything.

Two agents take you outside to your driveway in your pajamas or underwear. At this point your neighbors are beginning to peek curiously out of their windows. The agents push you into the back seat of a G-ride — a late-model American made sedan that smells of air freshener and despair. The two agents sit on either side of you in the back seat; a third agent climbs into the front seat. You shift uncomfortably, trying to avoid sitting on your handcuffed hands. But there’s no way to get comfortable sitting in your underwear in the back of a G-ride with your hands cuffed behind you.

The agents begin to question you about your business dealings. They don’t read you your rights first — they’ll say later they didn’t have to, because you totally weren’t in custody, despite being handcuffed in the back of a G-ride in your underwear surrounded by FBI agents in raid jackets. The agents tag-team you, switch topics rapidly, play good-cop-bad-cop, and use every law enforcement rhetorical trick to intimidate you. We have some really serious questions here, they say. But if you just cooperate, maybe we can clear all of this up.

(note: DMCA-whatever snip mandated by blogger.com because the author wet himself that someone reposted his article... in his name with a link to his site.)

After a few uncomfortable hours, the agents uncuff you, pull you out of the car, and hand you an incomplete, inaccurate, and illegible receipt purporting to state what they’ve taken. They haul off boxes of documents, disks, disk drives, and whatever else catches their fancy. They’ll see you soon, they say.

And, relatively speaking, they do. Six months later you are indicted. You’re indicted not only for whatever matter the FBI was investigating. As a kicker, you’re also indicted under 18 U.S.C. section 1001 for lying to the FBI. That’s a felony. Your lawyer reviews the discovery, and tells you that when the FBI agents asked you whether you were at that meeting two years ago with Mr. Smith and Mr. Jones, they already knew the answer to the question. Mr. Jones recorded the meeting and is cooperating with the FBI, and they had two other witnesses who placed you there. There was no chance whatsoever that your denial — whether it was a panic-induced brain fart, or a failure of memory, or a lie — could have misled or deterred the FBI in its investigation for even a moment. But that doesn’t matter. Though materiality is an element of Section 1001, it’s a weak, diluted type of materiality. Statements to the government are deemed material if they are the sort of statements that have the capacity to influence it. Courts have come very close to creating a presumption of materiality by reasoning that if the information were not material the government would not have asked for it and you wouldn’t have offered it. There was a time when most prosecutors thought it was chickenshit to charge someone with a felony for an exculpatory denial of wrongdoing that never fooled anyone; that time is in the past.

So. By failing to shut the fuck up, you have just handed the feds a gimme felony charge that will make your case much more difficult to defend.

(note: second DMCA-whatever snip mandated by blogger.com because the author wet
himself that someone reposted his article... in his name with a link to
his site. God did you actually spend time and money whining about someone who gave props to your advice?)
Don’t be a fool. If there’s a chance that cooperation will satisfy the authorities today, there will still be a chance in a day or a week or a month after you’ve consulted a lawyer who understands the situation. When you answer law enforcements’ questions — especially when you do it in a stressful situation like a search — you take grave risks of substantially worsening your situation. You may say, “oh, but I won’t lie.” Sure. But can you be sure, sitting cuffed in your underwear at six in the morning in that G-ride, that you will remember events from years ago accurately? Are you sure you won’t be confused and muddled under the circumstances? Are you sure that the government won’t — fueled by claims by cooperators — believe that you’ve lied? Do you really think that if you misremember or mix up events in your head or if your memory is different than the story of a cooperator, that the government is going to give you the benefit of the doubt?
Don’t be a fool. Invoke. For God’s sake, just shut up.

(I'm not the loser, I didn't cry to a pack of bureaucratic jackals and spend money and time for your precious fucking "copyright". God you're a fucking fool Ken.)

Ken, you have good advice but you're not the only person who has thought of shutting the hell up around the enemy. You just put it in different words is all. I quote full articles all the time and you are the FIRST to get their panties in a wad over it. Get over yourself, you're not Shakespeare.

Trust me Ken, I will NOT be quoting your douchebag ass again. Hang up your website and go back to watching American Idol or jacking off to child porn or taking turns fucking your mother or dog or whatever it is you do.

And as for Tomas-where's YOUR work? But I suppose having nothing's better than Joel Katz's lame ass excuse for a blog: "look at me I got four posts up so I kan rip on a Patriot trying to spread a good article! Hilk!"

God in Heaven you little bitch patriots, you keyboard minutemen are so fucking lame. I got zero-count em'-ZERO patience with you backstabbing little fucks. It's punks like y'all that blindly support Ron Paul as he embezzles you, expecting that putz on a white horse to solve all your problems. Meanwhile you kick back, write a few words or trade articles (NOT PASSING THEM ON IN FULL-GOD FORBID ANYONE DO THAT!)

Ansley knows what I'm talking about;)

I've been up in this since 2005-look to your right at my article index. You little snitch bitches got something to say to that, I'm right here.

You pitching a bitch fit because who is supposed to be a fellow Patriot does the honor of putting up YOUR article, CREDITING YOU AND YOUR "POPEHAT"-you going to run like a little snitch bitch to the enemy? I shared what at the time I thought was an awesome piece of advice about contact with the enemy. This by the way is the first time I've had someone shit themselves over the honor. I'd kill to have my work copied, my message sent out. Guess being a libertarian does things to your thought process or something.

Freedom Guide has been my work for God and Country-hell the whole sorry planet-since 2005. Who are you to attack Free Speech? Are you some kind of fed? You must be.

Fuck with my blog and you fuck with me. You fuck with my Free Speech. You fuck with the Freedom Movement, the Patriot Movement-remember what those are? You are a small, small "man"-you and your ten or so groupies.

Do yourself and yours a favor-reconsider and get over it. This is one thing you don't want to do.

For a lawyer Ken you sure are fucking stupid... oh wait. You are a lawyer so you are fucking stupid.

Fair use is exactly that; I didn't put my name on your words, and I put a link. You got attribution and I'm not doing this for any money. Go back to chasing ambulances and profiting off broken families you rat fucker.

I still can't believe you dickriders are still obsessed with this post AFTER A FUCKING YEAR.

Time to tear yourself from your computer-you can do it, I know your funky naked hide's about sealed to your chair but by God you got to get up, take a shower... a long shower... okay a very long shower... yep, take that shower and go out into the real world.

The real world, there are actually real world problems out there that need tackled and you should be out there helping out those in need but first you have to get real, get over yourselves, and get that life you always needed.

Copying and proper attribution under Fair Use does NOT constitute theft. Theft would be replacing your pedo lawyer boyfriend's name with mine... which I never did. Hell I had this same argument with a CORPORATION over some video I used in a video and THEY saw the light and backed off...

Ken needs to get over himself. Fuck you and fuck your crusty cunt whore ass mother for not aborting your ass.

You popehat dorks really got nothing better than to comment on year plus old reposts?

Y'know a couple of you have posted your faces as avatars and using that as a guide I must say you might begin to have success socially if you'd:

showershavelose weightget a life

Might even get laid but even not that crack whore would appreciate if if you didn't smell like you literally live in front of the computer... obsessing because I reposted your gay lover's article after attributing him and linking... I mean, you nerds make a trucker gag.

You keep throwing around the phrase "Fair Use" as if you know what it means, so you might as well actually know what it means. In order to qualify as Fair Use, your use of Ken's work must pass four specific tests:

1) Purpose and Character: Is your use of the work somehow transformative? Is it critique, parody, news? Does it provide some value that a simple link to the original does not? Verdict: NOT FAIR USE. It's a slavish reproduction, right down to the links and italics.

2) Nature: Facts and ideas can't be copyrighted; only expressions of them. For example, if Ken published his height and weight, there'd be nothing to stop you from publishing the same height and weight. Verdict: NOT FAIR USE. You copied the full expression of the work, every last sardonic and stylistic detail.

3) Amount: Fair Use says that you can, without permission, import excerpts or quotes from a work into your new work for purposes of demonstration and illustration. A book review quoting passages from the book is a good (and common) example. Verdict: NOT FAIR USE. You copied the whole damn thing.

4) Effect on work's value: By reposting this, even with links and attribution, you offer it as a "direct market" substitute for the original, thereby (potentially) driving traffic away from Ken's blog and toward your own, which weakens the work's market value to its owner. Furthermore, the way you posted it kinda makes it look like Ken wrote it for you or your site, thereby making it look like Ken might actually associate professionally with paranoid, establishment-fearing douchebags. Verdict: NOT FAIR USE.

Geez. You'd think such a a self-professed hard-core libertarian would have more respect for individual property rights and ownership of creative output.

Hey, I'm just trying to help. Words mean things, and when you use them, people judge your ideas according to the words you use to express them. You want to make an argument why it's OK to steal someone else's work? That's fine. But use the right tool for the job. You wouldn't use a stock Prius to drive your militia to your Awesome Resistance Compound, would you? No. So don't use Fair Use to make an argument about appropriation of property in the name of the struggle.

Another example: I'm unclear on what "cunt assed whore" means. I guess I'll have to ask grandma.

Michael K also grossly overestimates my opinion of him and whatever he has to say. He should post a link to his blog so I can SCRAPE his work... don't worry I'll put your name and link on as per Fair Use and then I can rip on his ass.

"Awesome Resistance Compound": Michael is a flaming coward who cannot be bothered with putting action behind his words, he'd rather continue stale, year old flame matches to a link only HE gives a flaming fuck about.

Really, Michael K is lying about his crusty cunt whore ass grandma, he knows EXACTLY what that's about and is up in that nightly. You must not need any ribbed rubbers.

Followers

United Patriot Network

REAL OATH KEEPERS DON'T DO THIS

COPS... WAKE UP

HOW TO SHOOT A RIFLE TRACT

How to Shoot a Rifle
How to Shoot a Rifle
Quick tract on how to shoot a rifle, laid out to be published as a credit card size tract you can print out and plant anywhere and everywhere.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Print onto two, two sided pages if you can't have that option with your printer, you will have to feed and switch sides yourself. Cut horizontally along the dividing lines, top and bottom of the panels and along the outside edge. BE CERTAIN NOT TO LOSE TRACK OF YOUR SECTIONS OR HOW THEY'RE ORIENTED!!!!
You need to cut so that pages one and three are facing up.
When you have your horizontal sections-you should have eight-you then start stacking them, top section, first page over next section down first page, then those two sections placed over the third section down, then the three stacked sections over the bottom section, first page.
Then, your stacked sections go atop the top section, second page, then that stack goes over the next section down of the second page, then the stack goes over the third section down of the second page, and then finally the stack goes atop the bottom section, second page.
AGAIN, DO THIS WITH PAGES ONE AND THREE FACING UP ON A DOUBLE-SIDE PRINT JOB, YOU SHOULD HAVE TWO, REPEAT, TWO DOUBLE SIDED SHEETS OF PAPER.
Staple together.
Pass them out everywhere, the enemy has spent generations vilifiying gun ownership and making rifle marksmanship about a lost art to the average American weaned on hip shooting Hollywood action stars as the actors depicting them cower in fear and so have this BS hapless victim mentality reinforced. Hapless victims are easier to shoot at and herd into camps than Americans who know how to shoot.
This is a beginner's tract, but it has the basics. Pass these around and help save Our America.

About Me

I have been active in the Freedom Movement since 2005-although I've been a supporter since Ruby Ridge. A long time ago was the time to rise up and throw our enemies off our backs but we have to do this now.
Go through all the years as much of my work can be found earlier on. Print them out, keep an open mind and if I'm right, well... why not remove yourself from the system, organize recall elections, learn how to hit a man sized target out to 500 yards?
BE YOUR OWN LEADER
Email at j-croft@graffiti.net

Google Translation

20 Rules-who follows them?

I'm placing these 2o rules someone posted for their group, and I want you to guess which one:

1. They are voracious in their infoseeking. If it takes all night long, or weeks, or years, they will look and look till they get what they have been looking for.

2. Whenever one of their associates or slaves needs something for a mission, Illuminati members make sure this person or persons get the material resources they need to get the job done, whether it be by contributions or whatever. Even if the person is disliked, all that is necessary is that the person has the skills for the job and the plan be workable. No whining on forums, no silly speeches, just gets done.

3. They know how to conserve their resources. They do not throw out all their chips all in on one go.

4. They trust their instincts.

5. If they see an opening, they do not hesitate to take advantage and exploit it.

6. They do not go into deep dark depressions just because they had one minor setback. They use everything they have to find out exactly what went wrong, and correct the problem.

7. They know how to organize themselves.

8. Among them, concepts of color, sexual orientation, and fame are meaningless. The goal goes first.

9. They know what TV is and does - they introduced it, you know! The goal comes before the TV or any of their other mind control devices, such as video games. Watching all those hours every day and being "awake" are like matter and anti-matter. They cannot be in the same place at the same time.

10. They know to not let anyone take what they have. If someone tried to CPS their kids there'd be hell on all involved in trying, even the person who made the call. Literally.

11. You can insult them all you want, call them anything, and they do not take it like Joe and Jane Public would. This is because they have absolutely no pride or morals, but anyone who does with intelligence can easily integrate this into their minds.

12. They would NEVER, under any circumstances, sell out themselves out by giving their family secrets out to the public for peanuts, like so many of the commoners do by selling out their countries and spying on and black opping their fellow humans.

13. In the public eye, wanting a lot of material resources is seen as something to be ashamed of. It is a damn good thing! Everyone should have all the material items they need to do everything they need to do, and should feel pride in having the self-love for holding that perspective and moving with it. This is the mindset the leadership of the Illuminati hold.

14. When information is placed before them that is obviously a threat to their well-being, they immediately take action about it and do not go rushing to drown life circumstances in a TV or bag of takeout, even if they do not know precisely what to do at the moment.

15. Even if all hope seems lost, and the odds are against them, they still keep on working at it 110%.

16. They know the value of building up networks.

17. They feel no guilt about defending themselves from legal, physical, or other attacks. At times I read about people I see acting nice to their agents, saying sorry to them, when it was the agent who had infringed upon their rights. Never be sorry and apologetic to them. It's a clear cut sign of victim mentality and is asking for trouble.

18. They are flexible, to an extent, and do not work with the controlled by them mainstream science and know the reality and value of homeopathy, energy and herbal healing, and do not hesitate to take full advantage of these using all the resources they have at their disposal.

19. They have always understood that they have their livelihood to defend, which is their pyramidal control system and all the luxury that comes with it. Humanity will learn from this, whether it be gently through information like this article, or the hard way. Everyone must understand that their livelihoods are also being threatened, and act upon this via exposure of the agenda.

20. They know to set aside their petty differences when business needs to be taken care of.

Who wrote this?

Nobody in the movement. Someone claiming to have affilliation with the "illuminati" but whether or not doesn't matter, anyone can see the enemy presents a united front against us.

Who lives by this?

Not too many in the movement, in fact most of the time it seems like nobody.