Unsettled weather, with fresh winds, and storms at times, sums up the forecast for Internet governance (IG) in 2015, according to Diplo’s director Dr Jovan Kurbalija, speaking during Tuesday’s ‘crystal ball’ exercise – an annual event to discuss IG predictions for the year ahead. The discussion gathered over 80 participants online and in situ from Geneva.

The crystal ball exercise takes place in context: using terminology from US Secretary of Defense Gordon Rumsfeld’s famous quote, the year includes (a) developments expected during meetings and events planned for the year (known knowns), (b) debates which we know will take place but which will unfold in uncertain ways (known unknowns), and (c) unforeseeable developments that will undoubtedly take place during the year (unknown unknowns).

Predictions, reality checks, and IG in 2014

The spell of cloudy and stormy weather has persisted. It is not difficult to see why: cybersecurity threats are on the rise, users’ rights and freedoms continue to be threatened, and public interest is often sidelined by other dominant interests.

The community confirmed the importance of these developments in a survey conducted by Diplo and the Geneva Internet Platform (GIP) in December 2014. The survey findings show that the NETmundial meeting was considered the most important event in 2014, with the IANA transition process (closely followed by surveillance and privacy/data protection) as the most important development. ICANN CEO Fadi Chehadé was voted as the most prominent IG personality in 2014.

Known unknowns: seven main issues for 2015

Dr Kurbalija identified seven main issues that are likely to dominate the 2015 agenda:

Cybersecurity: Expected to top the list, cybersecurity debates will focus on security of the Internet (for example, critical infrastructure), on the Internet (for example, cybercrime), and by the Internet (for example, use of the Internet by terrorists).

Global IG architecture: Ranking second, the global architecture is based on two main premises: offline rules apply online, and International Law does apply to the Internet. It will be shaped by the the WSIS+10 process taking place this year, the UN agenda on sustainable development goals, and the decision on the Internet Governance Forum’s extended mandate. It will also be important to strengthen existing bodies, and find ways to ensure coordination among policy spaces.

IANA functions transition: The process that will see the NTIA’s IANA functions stewardship transition to the community is underway. With the IANA contract expiring in September 2015, the main question is whether the process will be complete by then.

Online privacy and data protection: One of the outcomes of the upcoming UN Human Rights Council’s meeting in March is expected to be the creation of a new office: the Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy. In May, we might also start seeing the results of negotiations between the EU and the USA on revisions to the US-EU Safe Harbor framework, aimed at ensuring that the data of European citizens is protected on US soil.

Net Neutrality: The global Net Neutrality developments will be largely influenced by the US Federal Communications Commission’s rules, and to a lesser extent, by developments at EU level. The international response will also be important.

Jurisdiction and anchoring of IG in existing law: While the premise is that offline rules apply online when it comes to regulation and International Law, the focus will be on how to apply the law, and how to revisit offline mechanisms when applying them to the online world.

ICANN and new domains: Last year, major issues revolved around the creation of new domain names such as .amazon and .wine – the issues will remain equally important on the global agenda in 2015.

Referring to the vibrant online debate on the webinar platform and Dr Kurbalija’s main predictions, Diplo’s Vladimir Radunović added that the US FCC’s rules on network neutrality will be important not only for the USA, but worldwide. Given the civil society’s and corporate sector’s involvement, a decision is likely to send a signal in favour of the multistakeholder model, and will also serve to highlight the roles and responsibilities of the actors when it comes to promoting and protecting the public interest.

On cybersecurity, Mr Radunović said that international peace and security aspects were now emerging. The number of cybersecurity measures, including confidence-building measures, sharing of information, and diplomatic training, were also increasing. Cybersecurity was thus moving away from the realm of engineers and the technical community to the level of leaders, diplomats, and other high-level representatives.

In a comment from the audience, Richard Hill from the Association for Proper Internet Governance (APIG) added that the newly formed Internet Social Forum was broadening the debate among players who have not yet been very active.

From the Internet governance barometer: developments in January and February 2015

An innovation from DiploFoundation and the GIP, launched by Dr Kurbalija during Tuesday’s webinar, was the Internet governance barometer, an analysis of specific IG issues in the public policy debate in comparison with those of the previous month.

With regard to the IG barometer for January, Dr Kurbalija explained that while there were no major developments in online privacy and data protection, jurisdiction, and ICANN and new domain names, the cybersecurity debate heightened following President Obama’s State of the Union address, and the reaction to the Charlie Hebdo attacks. Cybersecurity was also high on the agendas of last week’s World Economic Forum annual meeting in Davos.

January also saw the entry into force of the 2012 International Telecommunication Regulations.

February is expected to be particularly busy for the IANA transition process and ICANN due to ICANN’s 52nd meeting in Singapore. Interjecting, Nigel Hickson from ICANN indicated that the draft proposal for the IANA transition will not be ready for the Singapore meeting.

Next month will also be particularly busy for online privacy and data protection, with preparations for the UN Human Rights Council meeting on 2-27 March 2015.

The discussion included additional comments from online and in situ participants. One addressed the lack of importance of the development objective leading the participant to ask whether the multistakeholder model was actually working, given that we are still addressing problems which the model never addressed. Other comments referred to the NETmundial Initiative, the newly announced Internet Social Forum, and zero-ratings in the Net Neutrality debate.

Keep In Touch

DiploFoundation

Towards more inclusive and effective diplomacy

Diplo is a non-profit foundation established by the governments of Malta and Switzerland. Diplo works to increase the role of small and developing states, and to improve global governance and international policy development.