Yoga or any other exercise for the body is not so much different from walking meditation (especially if done with some mindfulness) - they all calm the body.Gil Fronsdal said: "Sometimes yoga is better, sometimes meditation is better." This is not much different from what the Buddha said.

You're all right, he does qualify "yoga is better" with "sometimes" (I just wanted an attention grabber title).

My pain condition doesn't allow me to do (hatha) yoga because I'm hyper-flexible (that's the consensus of me and my phyisical therapists). Stretching always causes me more pain. I prefer Active Qigong, aerobics and weight training which all can be done mindfully.

Mike wrote:The subtext of much of the talk could be put more bluntly: Stress relief (or blissing out, which he also discusses in the talk) has little, if anything, to do with Buddhist practice.

I don't know about that. John Kabat-Zinn in his Full Catastrophe Living says, "Yoga is meditation" (that's not necessarily an endorsement). And if stress is a form of dukkha, and you use blissing out to relieve stress, that's acceptable as long as you don't stop at just blissing out but use the stress relief as a tool for insight. How vipassana and samatha relate is the basic subtext, IMO. And as Revs. Sujato and Brahm contend (again, that's not necessarily an endorsement) vipassana creates it's own bliss/stress-relief/samatha.

I think we modern Theravadins are way too quick to judge, "this is Buddhist practice, that's not Buddhist practice" as if those opinion based distinctions are valid enough to withstand the scrutiny of practice in real life.

David wrote:I think a certain degree of calmness of the body is very conducive for meditation.

If we are to take anapansati seriously, this is a requirement. So if I calm my body using hatha yoga, or Active Qigong, or calm my body and mind with chakra meditation or embryonic (Qigong) breathing am I doing anapanasati? Am I even doing "Buddhist practice" anymore?

David wrote:Gil Fronsdal said: "Sometimes yoga is better, sometimes meditation is better." This is not much different from what the Buddha said.

Except yoga post-dates the Buddha, which the more provincial, narrow-minded, sectarian Theravadins will point out.

danieLion wrote:I think we modern Theravadins are way too quick to judge, "this is Buddhist practice, that's not Buddhist practice" as if those opinion based distinctions are valid enough to withstand the scrutiny of practice in real life.

danieLion wrote:If we are to take anapansati seriously, this is a requirement. So if I calm my body using hatha yoga, or Active Qigong, or calm my body and mind with chakra meditation or embryonic (Qigong) breathing am I doing anapanasati? Am I even doing "Buddhist practice" anymore?

great post. this has been on my mind a lot lately. my personal opinion is that they can absolutely be considered valid if practiced correctly. i think i mentioned to you that prior to my introduction to the Dhamma, my main practice was traditional Yoga. I eventually realized the Buddhas approach was superior, but I still found the Yoga practices useful and powerful & it took me a while to reconcile the two being that on the outside they were so different. I think, the principles of the Buddhas approach to meditation are really what's important and not so much the specifics of the technique itself. Even within more narrow ranges, re: the Thai Forrest Tradition, you have DRASTIC variance in technique... Ven's Thanissaro, Brahm, Sucitto, Sumedho all have very different approaches to meditation and I think to say they are wrong or unBuddhist would be silly.

"It's easy for us to connect with what's wrong with us... and not so easy to feel into, or to allow us, to connect with what's right and what's good in us."

danieLion wrote:I think we modern Theravadins are way too quick to judge, "this is Buddhist practice, that's not Buddhist practice" as if those opinion based distinctions are valid enough to withstand the scrutiny of practice in real life.

danieLion wrote:If we are to take anapansati seriously, this is a requirement. So if I calm my body using hatha yoga, or Active Qigong, or calm my body and mind with chakra meditation or embryonic (Qigong) breathing am I doing anapanasati? Am I even doing "Buddhist practice" anymore?

great post. this has been on my mind a lot lately. my personal opinion is that they can absolutely be considered valid if practiced correctly. i think i mentioned to you that prior to my introduction to the Dhamma, my main practice was traditional Yoga. I eventually realized the Buddhas approach was superior, but I still found the Yoga practices useful and powerful & it took me a while to reconcile the two being that on the outside they were so different. I think, the principles of the Buddhas approach to meditation are really what's important and not so much the specifics of the technique itself. Even within more narrow ranges, re: the Thai Forrest Tradition, you have DRASTIC variance in technique... Ven's Thanissaro, Brahm, Sucitto, Sumedho all have very different approaches to meditation and I think to say they are wrong or unBuddhist would be silly.

I used to do pranayama a lot when I was younger and have only in the past few years looked at chakra techniques (and Qigong) and added them to my arsenal of pain reduction and body calming techniques. But they serve my purposes as a Buddhist, not the other way around; that is, I'm a Buddhist. not a Hindu.

Rev. Sucitto uses Qigong quite a bit and I find it a nice fit with Rev. Geoff's, Rev. Fuang's and Rev. Lee's takes on anapanasati.

Just wanted to agree with the general sentiment here. I have been doing a bit more yoga lately for stress relief and find it very helpful.

I might take it one step further, actually. I have a tendency to do a lot of striving in my sitting, trying to immediately obtain calm from the breath. I have a job that is quite demanding somtimes. I think so far that yoga is better for just getting out the work-day stresses, and then I can have a more relaxed and productive, if shorter, sitting session afterwards. Then, I am not forcing my breath around as much and constantly striving/desiring when trying to do vipassana.

At least, this seems to be the best for me, as a busy layperson and parent, for now. My goal is to eventually bring more focused awareness, noting, or metta phrases into the yoga practice, but I am still working on learning the yoga asanas, for now.

mynameisadahn wrote:At least, this seems to be the best for me, as a busy layperson and parent, for now. My goal is to eventually bring more focused awareness, noting, or metta phrases into the yoga practice, but I am still working on learning the yoga asanas, for now.

For an Yoga Is Meditation perspective check out John Kabat-Zinn's book Full Catastrophe Living.