Why Roy Moore Matters

Why would anyone vote for Roy Moore, given the recent accusations against him of sexually inappropriate behavior with young girls? Patrick Buchanan argues the stakes are simply too high not to do so.

By Patrick Buchanan

Why would Christian conservatives in good conscience go to the polls Dec. 12 and vote for Judge Roy Moore, despite the charges of sexual misconduct with teenagers leveled against him? Answer: That Alabama Senate race could determine whether Roe v. Wade is overturned. The lives of millions of unborn may be the stakes.

Republicans now hold 52 Senate seats. If Democrats pick up the Alabama seat, they need only two more to recapture the Senate, and with it the power to kill any conservative court nominee, as they killed Robert Bork.

Today, the GOP, holding Congress and the White House, has a narrow path to capture the Third Branch, the Supreme Court, and to dominate the federal courts for a decade. For this historic opportunity, the party can thank two senators, one retired, the other still sitting.

The first is former Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada.

In 2013, Harry exercised the “nuclear option,” abolishing the filibuster for President Barack Obama’s judicial nominees. The Senate no longer needed 60 votes to confirm judges. Fifty-one Senate votes could cut off debate and confirm.

Iowa’s Chuck Grassley warned Harry against stripping the minority of its filibuster power. Such a move may come back to bite you, he told Harry. Grassley is now judiciary committee chairman.

And this year a GOP Senate voted to use the nuclear option to shut down a filibuster of Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, who was then confirmed with 55 votes.

Yet the Democratic minority still had one card to play to block President Trump’s nominees—the “blue slip courtesy.”

If a senator from the state where a federal judicial nominee resides asks for a hold on proceedings, by not returning a blue slip, the judiciary committee has traditionally honored that request and not held hearings.

Sen. Al Franken of Minnesota used the blue slip to block the Trump nomination of David Stras of Minnesota to the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Franken calls Stras too ideological, too conservative.

But Grassley has now decided to reject the blue slip courtesy for appellate court judges, since their jurisdiction is not just over a single state like Minnesota, but over an entire region.

Thus have the skids been greased for a conservative recapture of the federal judiciary unseen since the early days of FDR.

Eighteen of the 179 seats on the U.S. appellate courts and 119 of the 677 seats on federal district courts are already open. More will be opening up. No president in decades has seen the opportunity Trump has to remake the federal judiciary.

Not only are the federal court vacancies almost unprecedented, a GOP Senate and Trump are working in harness to fill them before January 2019, when a new Congress is sworn in.

If Republicans blow this opportunity, it is unlikely to come again. For the Supreme Court has seemed within Republican grasp before, only to have it slip away because of presidential errors.

Nixon had four nominees to the Supreme Court confirmed and Gerald Ford saw his nominee, John Paul Stevens, unanimously confirmed. But of those five justices confirmed from 1969 to 1976, Stevens and Harry Blackmun joined the liberal bloc, and Chief Justice Warren Burger and Lewis Powell voted for Roe v. Wade.

Of Reagan’s three Supreme Court nominees confirmed, Sandra Day O’Connor and Anthony Kennedy cast crucial votes in 5-4 decisions to defeat the strict constructionists led by Antonin Scalia.

George H.W. Bush named Clarence Thomas to the court, but only after he had elevated David Souter, who also joined the liberal bloc.

Hence, both Trump, by whom he nominates, and a Republican Senate, with its power to confirm with 51 votes, are indispensable if we are to end judicial dictatorship in America.

And 2018 is the crucial year.

While Democrats, with 25 Senate seats at risk, would seem to be facing more certain losses than the GOP, with one-third as many seats at stake, history teaches that the first off-year election of Trump could prove a disaster.

Consider. Though Ike ended the Korean War in his first year, he lost both Houses of Congress in his second. Reagan enacted one of the great tax cuts in history in his first year, and then lost 26 seats in the House in his second.

Bill Clinton lost control of both the House and Senate in his first off-year election. Barack Obama in 2010 lost six Senate seats and 54 seats and control of the House. And both presidents were more popular than Trump is today.

If the election in Virginia this year is a harbinger of what is to come, GOP control of Congress could be washed away in a tidal wave in 2018.

Hence, this coming year may be a do-or-die year to recapture the third branch of government for conservatism.

Which is why that Dec. 12 election in Alabama counts.

Pat Buchanan is a writer, political commentator and presidential candidate. He is the author of a new book, Nixon’s White House Wars: The Battles That Made and Broke a President and Divided America Forever and previous titles including The Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From Defeat to Create the New Majority. Both are available from the AFP Bookstore.

6 Comments on Why Roy Moore Matters

An interesting take from Mr. Buchanan. Roy Moore is definitely the lesser of the two evils, for those who play that game. As I noted in my last blog post ( https://godkinandsoil.wordpress.com/2017/12/04/they-hate-us/ ), it is ironic that Roy Moore fanatically supports Israel, yet the Jewish establishment still hate him.

THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE!
JFK grabbed as much pu**y as Hugh Hefner, but saved the world from a nuclear disaster!
The “Holier then thou” CIA and Joint Chiefs of Staff wanted to nuke Russia and Cuba and create World War III.

MORE THAN LIKELY MOORE IS A PEDOPHILE, LIKE MANY OF THE COMPROMISED LEADERS. BUCHANNAN’COMPROMISES MORALITY FOR POLITICS.’ IT’S TO BE EXPECTED, ‘ITS A BIG CLUB, AND WE AIN’T IN IT.’!!!
“BUCHANAN AND MOORE ARE IN THE CLUB, WHAT SHOULD WE EXPECT?”!!!

Okay … so Pat, you are ok with a sex offender being in office (no, I don’t meant Trump. Trump will get his dues, soon). Regardless of your views on unborn children, no one like Moore should EVER get near office. Never.

How on earth is anyone supposed to believe that the government is with the people, for the people, if you allow criminals like him to take office?

Hopefully, people will see through this as the political nonsense it is and vote against Moore.

I am from Alabama, and I support Roy Moore. I have met him twice; once in private with his wife. He understands the problems we face, including the illegal income tax (redistribution of the wealth: a Marxist principle). We discussed the winless and useless war waged by those who profit the most and support the likes of Lindsey Graham and John McCain. In reality, we have lost our once great nation to a bunch of sexual perverts and minorities who have no idea what common law is about. The only hope we have is a true political or bloody revolution and throw the bums out of DC. These parasites are nothing but self serving financial blood suckers who draw obscene wages, enjoy unbelievable perks, and enjoy a retirement program that is fit for royalty. We got to get the corrupted parasites out of office.