“The fetus is at risk for serious harm without the C-section,” one part said. And for the mother, “benefits outweigh risk,” another part of the note said.

Senior hospital staff also signed off on the C-section.

Dray’s attorney said the smoking gun for her case is also in the notes.

“I have decided to override her refusal to have a C-section,” the doctor’s note said.

“The mother has the right. It is ethically wrong. It is medically wrong. It is always wrong to take a knife and stick it into a woman when she says no,” said Bast.

Staten Island University Hospital said it doesn’t comment on pending litigation, but “supports a woman’s decision to have a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC).”

Art Caplan, a bioethicist at NYU Langone Medical Center, said “The doctor can cajole, persuade, argue, do everything in their power to get the woman to change her mind, but they should not ever do a procedure, even with the fetus in trouble, against the will of the mother.”

Dray said she would like to grow her family of three boys, but she added that giving birth now scares her.

“It was very painful to be treated this way,” she said.

Dray, who is suing for undisclosed damages, said her bladder was also injured during the procedure.