Personal Aim(s):

Saturday, April 28, 2018

Can ½ of a Teaspoon of Baking Soda Before Each Meal Cure (Auto-)Immune Disease? Or is this Just a Misinterpretation of the Words of an Overzealous Press Release Writer?

The press release that accompanied the publication of a study from the Augusta University seems to promote baking soda as a panacea for every (auto-) immune/inflammation-related disease.

It sounds almost too good what a recently published press-release from the Augusta University claims (read it): "A daily dose of baking soda may help reduce the destructive inflammation of autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis." WOW! ... but wait. This cannot be true, can it?

Well, the mechanism that is introduced in the press release does not seem to be totally absurd. The fact that a temporary alkalization of the otherwise acidic chyme in the stomach will trigger for the production of an increased amount of stomach acid has been known for decades (it is also why classic antacids usually make heartburn worse when used more than occasionally | Maton 1999).

You can learn more about bicarbonate and pH-buffers at the SuppVersity

Caffeine + Bicarb Make Champions

Alkaline Diet = Ergogenic

HIIT it Hard W/ NaCHO3

+100% Anaerobic Endurance

Bicarb Buffers Creatine

Instant 14% HIIT Boost

The news, however, is that this up and down in gastric pH could make the life of people who suffer from auto-immune diseases significantly easier, as the reacidification of the stomach is not the only thing that happens in response to the bicarbonate preload. In fact, the rebound of stomach acid is probably just a stimulus for the thymus, which will react by "repolarizing" the macrophages.

Wait!? Polarization? That's a property of waves, not of cells, isn't it?

If we go by the physics definition, polarization is "the action of restricting the vibrations of a transverse wave, especially light, wholly or partially to one direction". For us, however, it's the more general term that's relevant, here: "division into two sharply contrasting groups or sets of opinions or beliefs." When it comes to Donald Trump, for example, you can clearly observe a polarization of the US society - with supporters and opponents being "two sharply contrasting groups".

Figure 1: Overview of how different stimuli, e.g. TNF-alpha will trigger the commitment of Th0 (=naive T-helper cells/lymphocytes) to Th1, Th2, Th17 and Treg cells (as published on selfHacked.com; original source unknown). These T-cells, are the first responders, they attack and kill intruders that will then be 'eaten' by macrophages.

A similar phenomenon can be observed for the T-helper cells and their partners, the macrophages in our blood. Unlike Trump supporters and opponents, though, they don't react to (fake-)news, but rather to the stimuli you can see in Figure 1.

I don't intend to go into more detail here because, for our purposes, it shall suffice to know that the same mechanisms that govern the polarization of T-cells will also determine the fate of the macrophages that will appear on the scene, whence the T-cells did their job (on nobelprize.org you can find a relatively simple explanation of the inner workings of the immune system) and promote the progression of pro- or anti-inflammatory immune responses via TNF-alpha and IL-10 release, respectively. In an (over-)simplified model, the Th1/Th2 and the M1/M2 (M=macrophages) ratios can thus both be used as proxies of whether the immune system is in an M1/inhibit-type mode,primed to defend the host, or in an M2/heal-type mode, focussing on the repair and replacement of lost or defected tissue to maintain host homeostasis (Mills 2015a).

The vagal nerve, again and a new role for our mesothelial cells in the gut

As previously hinted at, it depends on the presence of certain signaling molecules like TNF-alpha or IL-6 (to name just the two best-known factors) whether naive T-cells and macrophages will be configured to become Th1/M1 or Th2/M2 cells.... and that's where the press release starts to fail us and we have to go to the actual study by Sarah C. Ray and colleagues from the Augusta University (Ray 2018) to understand or rather rationalize how the sudden in- and slow decrease of gastric pH will do what the author of the press release calls "tell the fist-sized organ [thymus] that there's no need to mount a protective immune response" (press release).

Even though, the effect is in fact mediated by the mesothelial cells in our gut, the results of the study at hand do suggest a direct involvement of their wiring to the vagal-nerve, thus implicating the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway as the fundamental trigger of the (re-)polarization of the macrophages, Sarah Ray et al. observed in their recently published paper.

This involvement of the vagal nerve is not new as it has been observed and described as a main regulator of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway and thus mediator of immune homeostasis before (the vagus nerve has, in fact, been implicated as key-player in the interaction between the gut microbiome and the immune system and even appetite and mood, too | cf. Browning 2017).

Why did the scientists do their study and what exactly were they studying? Ray et al. drew on evidence fro a number of small clinical trials as well as experimental models which indicate that supplementation with oral sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) may slow the decline in kidney function in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. That is relevant to the topic of auto-immune diseases because the #1 hypothesis to explain the beneficial effects scientists have observed in this patient group is... you guessed it: inflammation. Accordingly, the scientists from the Augusta University set up a series of experiments to investigate if and to which extent baking soda, sodium bicarbonate, or NaHCO3, which all refer to the same white powder (not to be confused with other white powders ;-) may have previously overlooked fundamental anti-inflammatory effects that could be mediated via a similar or different pathways within the gastric <> spleen axis that has recently received a lot of attention for its role in the interaction between the microbiome and our immune system.

In their study, Ray et al. started with a rodent model - more specifically, the researchers chose Dahl salt-sensitive (SS) rats, in which significant inflammation is known to develop very early in life and keeps increasing from 'low' to 'extreme' as they age.

Figure 3: The ratio of pro-inflammatory M1 to anti-inflammatory M2 monocytes (this is a simplification) was almost reversed by 14 days w/ 0.1 mol of NaHCO3 in their drinking water compared to vehicle control in both the kidney's and spleen - with a clear trend to a less inflammatory M1/M2 ratio that was below 1 (Ray 2018).

Using this model, the researchers generated the first experimental evidence that their hypothesis that baking soda would have measurable anti-inflammatory effects was true: When the rodents were provided with NaHCO3 containing drinking water Ray et al. observed...

in the rodents' kidneys and spleen (see Figure 3). This significant (p = 0.005) re-polarization from predominately M1 to M2 can be compared to switching the immune system from "red alert, attack the introducers" to "stay vigilant, and take care of maintenance".

Sorry, off topic: If the quotes I used in the last paragraph remind you of the bearded guy in "Il était une fois... la vie", also known as "Micro Patrol", "Es war einmal das Leben" or "Seimei no Kagaku: Mikuropatorōru", your early childhood memories may actually help you understand what macrophages are - there's a screengrab of the way they looked in this excellent educative TV show on the left... it's funny that this image pops up in my head even 25 years after I used to watch this show (let me know if you loved it, too)... but now back to the topic at hand ;-)

Figure 4: While there was a significant dose-effect ratio, even the lowest amount of HCO3 the scientists added to the rodents' water was highly effective in reducing, everything beyond what would translate to ~4g/l of baking soda completely pushed the pro-inflammatory M1/2-ratio to values below 1, which is highly desirable if your jacked up immune system is attacking everything in sight - including your own cells. Based on this observation the scientists chose to use a dose of 2g/250ml in the human experiment I'll describe in detail in the next paragraphs.

The rodent study also demonstrated that the effect is (a) clearly dose-dependent and that (b) even low doses of NaHCO3 in the drinking water (see Figure 4) suffice to reverse the ratio of M1/M2 macro and thus throw the immune system's main switch from "attack" to "standby"-mode.

For those who cannot wait: In humans, 2g/250ml of NaHCO3 worked wonders

If we do the math, those 0.01 M of bicarbonate translate to 610mg of HCO3. Given the fact that NaHCO3 has a ~1:3 ratio of Na to HCO3, this should be ~840mg of baking soda. Translation to humans is difficult because we'd have to take into account the rodent weight and their intake patterns. For those who cannot wait for dosage suggestions, I can yet already spoiler that Ray et al. used 2g of bicarbonate per 250ml in their follow-up human experiment (see below).

How the signals get from the gut to the spleen and why you should abstain from PPIs if you want to benefit: At least the hitherto available evidence suggests that the effect could be mediated by the activation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, the spleen will then react to by switching the immune cells from "fight"- to "guard"-mode come directly from the mesothelial cells in the abdominal cavity and are triggered by the sudden increase in pH. The cells line many body cavities in our body, including the digestive tract, where they cover the exterior of the organs and have previously been thought to primarily keep the organs from rubbing together. With their little fingers (=microvilli) that reach into the organs, though, they can also be seen as biosensors that warn the organs they cover that there is an invader and an immune response is needed.

Both, the inhibition of cholinergic transmission with MLA and the inhibition of the stomach acid rebound with PPIs weakens the effect on NaHCO3 in the rodent model.

What exactly it is that these cells respond to is not 100% clear, but the inhibitory effect of the administration of pretreatment with the proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) Esomeprazole suggests that a drop in pH alone is not sufficient, only if it's followed by a gradual increase in stomach acid effects can be observed... theoretically, however, there could be completely different mechanism and/or feedback loop may be at play when it comes to PPIs.

With the effects on the M1/M2 ratio occurring both, locally (kidney, spleen) and systemically (in the blood, not shown in Figure 1), the rodent experiment provided exactly the sought after initial evidence that the researchers were onto something that could be relevant way beyond chronic kidney disease. In fact, the repolarization of an out-of-control immune defense is often thought of as the golden grail of treating all sorts of auto-immune diseases.

As Figure 5 from Mills' 2012 review "M1 and M2 macrophages: oracles of health and disease" already suggests: it would be unwarranted (yet human) to think of M1 as "bad" and M2 as "good macrophages". In fact, we must not get carried away and forget that it's, as usual, the seesaw-principle you already know from the ages-old SuppVersity articles about fasting, AMPK, and mTOR that characterizes optimal health. Or, in other words, M1-dominant phases of acute inflammation, as you would need them to battle viral or bacterial infections, must alternate/be balanced with M2-dominant phases, whence the subsequent healing processes take place. In auto-immune diseases like arthritis or multiple-sclerosis, the figurative seesaw seems to be locked in an M1 dominant position... the question that arises is obviously:

Can bicarbonate treat auto-immune diseases from arthritis to multiple-sclerosis by setting the 'M1/M2 seesaw' back in motion and thus restoring immune balance?

It would be downright dishonest to make such a claim based on the study at hand - and yet, that's pretty much what the press release seems to do. From my good friend, Carl Lanore, the host of Super Human Radio (superhumanradio.net), I know that he's going to have one of the authors on the show on Monday; and, according to Carl, the authors are really unhappy with the way the study was depicted in the press release, too.

In an interview with my friend Carl Lanore for Super Human Radio Dr. O'Connor explains why he wasn't happy with the press release that caused all the turmoil, either - listen!

The press release misrepresents the study and, more importantly, its implications! As hinted at before, the scientists (one of whom is going to be a guest in Carl Lanore's Super Human Radio show on Monday, April 30, 2018) are not exactly happy with the way the study seems to posit that their results would show that taking bicarbonate before a meal will nullify/counter the pro-inflammatory effects of foods, when the study neither investigated subsequent food intake nor claims that there was any link to diet-induced inflammation at all (note: this mis-interpretation of thedy is probably based on a quote in the press release that reads "It's most likely a hamburger, not a bacterial infection." (press release) - I cannot tell for sure if the corresponding author Paul M. O'Connor actually said that, but if he did, I am pretty sure it was taken out of context... well, I guess we'll know on Monday when Carl hopefully meets my wish and asks him or his colleagues directly (update: here's the link to the podcast).

In contrast to what you may or may not have read about it, the study does not show that consuming bicarbonate before a meal will ward off the inflammatory assault from whatever junk it is you are shoveling down your piehole (that's the interpretation I've found many people had, when they read the copy+paste articles on the major "science news" outlets)... how could it be if neither the initial rodent, nor the human follow-up experiment had anything to do with diets.

So what does the study tell us, then?

The one thing the experiment in humans tells us is that the ingestion of 2g of bicarbonate dissolved in 250ml of water can have acute, systemic and, in view of the fact that the inflammatory effects accumulated over hours after the subjects consumed the drink, long-lasting anti-inflammatory effects on the immune system.

This effect is, as the scientists explain in the discussion of the results due to a (re-)polarization from M1 to M2 macrophages and increased FOXP3+ CD4+ T regulatory cells (Tregs) of which you may remember from Figure 1 that they regulate (hence T regulatory cells) the immune response and (not shown in Figure 1) have been implicated as potential targets for the treatment of auto-immune diseases, in which they fail to do their job of telling the autoimmune T-cells to behave (see Figure 6 | Grant 2015).

In the context of the profound overall anti-inflammatory effects Ray et al. observed in both rodents and humans, it is really possible that the chronic ingestion of bicarbonate would

be able to protect you from developing a Treg-malfunction, which appears to be closely related to the chronic inflammatory state, the scientists found to be ameliorated in response to the bicarbonate ingestion, and

maybe even restore normal Treg function so that they could do their job(s) and shut the autoreactive T-cells that are attacking one's own organs in autoimmune diseases down.

Moreover, if this mechanism is indeed, as the study at hand suggests, mediated by the activation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, the beneficial effects of the Tregs, of which Ray et al. highlight that they

"[...] may be beneficial in a wide variety of disease states that involve pathological activation of the immune system, including allergy, asthma, multiple sclerosis, graft versus host disease, diabetes, and hypertension as well as many others" (Ray 2018).

could be confounded by the profound decrease of TNA-alpha - the #1 among cytokines scientists have linked to the development/progression of a "broad range of disease states, including rheumatoid arthritis, cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis, irritable bowel disease, type 2 diabetes, and neurodegenerative diseases" (Ray 2018).

If and to which extent and in which conditions bicarbonates anti-inflammatory effects will become physiologically relevant is, however, as of now absolutely unknown (don't forget that).

Ok, that's not 100% true. For chronic kidney disease, which is likewise characterized by high TNF-alpha levels and chronic inflammation, there's plenty of evidence from both animal and human studies that the provision of sodium bicarbonate, administered in similarly small dosages as in the study at hand (just a reminder: 1x2g/250ml water) can at least slow down the progression of the disease (Susantitaphong 2012).

It's yet not just the fact that most scientists point towards the anti-acidogenic effects of bicarbonate as the underlying mechanism for the indisputable benefits of NaHCO3 supplements in CKD patients that raises the question whether we'd see similar benefits in autoimmune diseases - let alone (and again that's only what the press release, not the study implies) the immune response to certain foods you eat.

Figure 7: M1/inhibit or M2/heal-dominant macrophage responses (or mixtures) can each be beneficial or detrimental depending on the disease circumstance. For example, M1/Th1-dominant responses are required to fight many infections (left). But, M1/Th1 responses are also causative of destructive inflammatory conditions in the brain and in atherosclerosis (right | Mills 2015b) - as previously highlighted, it's a working seesaw (=balance) you should aim for.

While I will discuss the latter and corresponding recommendations I have seen on the Internet, already, in more detail in the bottom line, let me briefly address former, i.e. the potential effect on auto-immune disease. Yes, there's no doubt that Sarah C. Ray and colleagues are right to point out that their data suggests that NaHCO3 loading may...

"[...] provide a cheap, relatively safe, effective, and easily accessible and/or noninvasive method to activate cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathways in humans [which could] be of benefit to patients suffering from a multitude of inflammatory disease states [which] could potentially have significant clinical application to the treatment of human disease" (my emphasis in Ray 2018).

Unlike the press release, though, the scientists are also prudent enough to highlight that: "Future studies testing the efficacy of oral NaHCO3 to limit injury in models of inflammatory disease will be required to determine the therapeutic potential of this stimuli" (Ray 2018) - and if we're honest this is, if anything, the only 100% reliable take-home message of the study at hand.

Figure 8: The increase in M2 and decrease in M1 macrophages may be triggered by changes in gastric pH, but there's no evidence that the reacidification of the empty stomach (which won't take 3h) and the immune effects are synchronized. The little we know, today, does therefore make timing recommen-dations more or less impossible.

So what do you recommend, then? Well, firstly, I am not a medical practitioner, so I don't recommend anything. With that being said, I can give you some good reasons why I wouldn't do what I've seen others do online, already, i.e. indiscriminately recommend "take 2g of baking soda in 250ml water X minutes before a meal" or to "simply lace your water with 6g of baking soda per liter" - and I wouldn't do that even if I was a medical practitioner.

There's the practical reason, which holds true even if we assumed that the, as of yet not even investigated interaction with food, everyone seems to focus on in the discussion on the SuppVersity News and elsewhere, actually exists:

There's no way to guess the optimal timespan between the ingestion of NaHCO3 and the subsequent meal. So, there may be the interaction between foods, bicarbonate, and inflammation the press release seems to hint at, but (a) the study at hand did not even test for such an interaction and (b) we only know that the anti-inflammatory effect kept improving for the complete 3h measuring period in the subjects... if you'd best ingest the food at the peak level of M2 macrophages, of which the graphs in Figure 8 suggest that it may be 4-5h after the ingestion of the bicarbonate solution, or right before a meal is thus at best an (almost un-)educated guess.

And there's the theoretical reason that comes with the uncertainty about the (probably complex) underlying mechanisms and potential side effects if the supplementation offsets the important balance between M1 and M2 permanently in the opposite direction:

It is thus not just unclear if NaHCO3 would indeed help with autoimmune disease. In view of the fact that we don't know for sure how NaHCO3 exerts its anti-inflammatory effects on the immune system, how profound they are and how long they will last, it is, moreover, even possible that anything that that would go beyond what the authors in another quote from the infamous press release call "pushing [the immune response] toward one side by giving an anti-inflammatory stimulus" (I previously called that fixing the seesaw) could have serious unwanted side effects.

Note: I don't say it's likely that you would encounter side effects, but even O'Connors (alleged) statement that "[bicarbonate] is potentially a really safe way to treat inflammatory disease" (press release) still has the status of a hypothesis and requires testing in all sorts of different scenarios. I mean, you know that I am a huge fan of bicarbonate and have been using more than 2g regularly over the past years without any side effects, but that's an N=1 scenario that won't tell you anything about people with pre-existing health conditions that make them susceptible to infection, allergies, or even cancer... Why would I mention the three of them? Well, in the unfortunate case that there are problems due a chronic elevation of M2 (vs. M1) those would be related to the impairment of the early phase response to infections (like in the throat or intestine) to an exacerbation of food or contact allergies (Suzuki 2017), or - even worse - the promotion of proliferation not just of healthy cells, but also of cancer cells (Mills 2012 | all are also visualized in Figure 7 from Mills 2015b).

So, yes: It is well possible that the effects of bicarbonate will improve all sorts of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, but if we're honest, we know way too little about the way(s), the extent and timespan over which it affects the important M1:M2 balance to promote either bolus ingestions of NaHCO3 or lacing your water with bicarbonate as means to combat autoimmune diseases like arthritis and/or inflammatory diseases ranging from Alzheimer's to diabetes... as so often (and I hate this statement as much as you do) further research is warranted | Comment!

Additional Ressources

Join the Newsletter

Disclaimer:

The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is by no means intended as professional medical advice. Do not use any of the agents or freely available dietary supplements mentioned on this website without further consultation with your medical practitioner.