As Seen in Vanity Fair's August 2006 Issue!
As Seen in US News & World Report's September 11 Fifth Anniversary Issue!
As Seen in Time Magazine's September 11, 2006 Issue!
As Seen in Phoenix New Times' August 9, 2007 Issue!

Monday, February 22, 2010

Washington Times Bites on Gage's Gaggle

There is also evidence of "advanced explosive nano-thermitic composite material found in the World Trade Center dust," Mr. Gage says. The group's petition at www. ae911truth.org is already on its way to members of Congress.

"Government officials will be notified that 'Misprision of Treason,' U.S. Code 18 (Sec. 2382), is a serious federal offense, which requires those with evidence of treason to act," Mr. Gage says. "The implications are enormous and may have profound impact on the forthcoming Khalid Shaikh Mohammed trial."

The other side fears, above all, fundraisers, positive publicity, growing anti-establishment consensus, the first responders and the 9/11 family members, and any constructive cooperation between those elements and the truth movement.

Ooooh I'm kept awake at night by the fear that the Washington Times is going to wake up the sheeple. Please, this hardly counts as positive publicity. As far as ultranationalist kookloonery, it doesn't get worse than the Times.

'The other side fears, above all, fundraisers, positive publicity, growing anti-establishment consensus, the first responders and the 9/11 family members, and any constructive cooperation between those elements and the truth movement.'

As I've said before, let us know when you score on any of these counts. Come 2101, you'll still be seen as a bunch of fuck-ups and failures, who'll be at best a footnote to history - if that.

Incidentally, the 'Washington Times' has contributed to investigative journalism, insofar as it blew the fact (shortly after the Nairobi and Dar e-Salaam bombings) that the NSA had a tap on OBL's sat-phone.

Remember, if one hasn't heard about any of this stuff, Gage's lies, misquotes, fantasy and delusion can sound convincing.

Maybe. I truly hope you are right, but if she didn't think through the implications of Gage's accusations, and the vicious slander it entails, then she is dumber than a post.

On another note, still waiting for video of the Dick Gage & Grifter show. Well, they have a "press recording" a Gage's website. Isn't it funny in the age of instant video where twoofers can produce one on the spot, miraculously, there are no videos of Dick and DRG on 2/19. It's really shocking, I must say. Why can't they just show of video of the thousands in attendance demanding a new investigation! Could there be a COVERUP of the poor turnout??????

This is a great thing. Even these troofer lamebrains started to realize what a laughingstock they are. This publicity will whip up the loons, they will actually think the 'breakthrough' is happening ...Only to lead them to try another amazingly stupid undertaking, leading to epic failure and our derisive laughter.

On another note, still waiting for video of the Dick Gage & Grifter show. Well, they have a "press recording" a Gage's website. Isn't it funny in the age of instant video where twoofers can produce one on the spot, miraculously, there are no videos of Dick and DRG on 2/19.

As always, quote mining. Why don't you people try reading the things you source? Just once, try it. You'll notice first that Wikipedia's source is offline, and second, when checking the archive, that the full context of the story doesn't quite paint the picture desired by GuitarBill.

Anyways, reserve a place for Dorothy, and her Global Climate Change conspiracy theory. And for all those folks who thought Saddam had anything to do with 9/11. And for those folks who thought Saddam still had WMD.

In fact, most of you ultra-nationalist apes still think this. Right Dorothy?

angrysoba, the agenda for the big twoof event mentioned a press conference followed by a luncheon. That video, although it is labeled the press conference, appears to be the luncheon. Yes, some people did attend, perhaps 40 or 50. Looks to be a lot of old hippy types, certainly not many of the 3K architects they invited. In any case, I don't see any questions being asked just Grifter, fatso Jones and Dick Gage blathering. So yes, there is video, although none of screaming crowds.

angrysoba, the agenda for the big twoof event mentioned a press conference followed by a luncheon. That video, although it is labeled the press conference, appears to be the luncheon. Yes, some people did attend, perhaps 40 or 50. Looks to be a lot of old hippy types, certainly not many of the 3K architects they invited. In any case, I don't see any questions being asked just Grifter, fatso Jones and Dick Gage blathering. So yes, there is video, although none of screaming crowds.

This comment is dripping with fear, awe and despair. I have to laugh. They're not hiding in your closet and they're not going to bite you.

Sigh. This is the actual press conference, ConsDimWit.http://vimeo.com/9614190

And this is Q&A session you pretend doesn't exist:http://vimeo.com/9613696

So stop whining about the luncheon attendance, and stop spinning like you motherfuckers usually do.

Uh oh, Roidy's blowing a cork again. Okay, how many of those in attendence were journalists representing real news organizations? Twoofers asking softball questions of their heroes don't count.

You're moving the goal posts. That doesn't count. My objection was with your cherry picking of the luncheon, not linking to the actual press conference, and denying there was a Q&A.

Were there any professional journalists? I didn't see any. I don't care either. (What else is new?) You are moving the goal posts.

Eventually, people forget the lies you tell, even though you may even be right about WTC 1, 2 and 7. But your constant lying and the constant lying of the state you worship have produced the books, the documentaries, the activists and the organizations you so hate.

I said I didn't see a video on Gage's site when I looked, perhaps there is one now. They didn't have many people there and there were no real journalists. I'm sorry to burst your little bubble, but those observations are quite valid and would hardly qualify as "lies." In any case, you say that about pretty much any utterance from anyone who doesn't share your world view so it isn't much an insult.

May they torment your soul infinitely.

You have a very inflated sense of the importance of the twoof movement. Its impact is hardly big enough to "torment" me. Although it is interesting you raise it, given your rancid diatribes, I suspect you do live with a lot of torment.

In any case, you say that about pretty much any utterance from anyone who doesn't share your world view so it isn't much an insult.

Like they say, you are entitled to your own opinions...

You have a very inflated sense of the importance of the twoof movement. Its impact is hardly big enough to "torment" me. Although it is interesting you raise it, given your rancid diatribes, I suspect you do live with a lot of torment.

I care about 9/11. I have an extreme disliking for people who stalk 9/11 family members and tell them to commit suicide, and the blogs that facilitate those people. Blogs that encourage anti-dissent, and cloak state worship in so-called "skepticism". You people have no objectivity, and are in many ways no better than some of the worst of the truth movement.

And yeah, I've noticed how most of you pretend to be stoic about it. It's a tellingly implausible defense for your presence and passionate support for this Brummagem, right-wing extremist and pro-nationalist establishment "blog"

The Raging Diaper scribbles, "...As always, quote mining. Why don't you people try reading the things you source? Just once, try it. You'll notice first that Wikipedia's source is offline, and second, when checking the archive, that the full context of the story doesn't quite paint the picture desired by GuitarBill."

Would someone fluent in retard be so kind as to translate the Raging Diaper's comment into English?

It's pretty clear, to me at least, that you don't understand the definition of "quote mining". After all, shit-for-brains, how can I be guilty of quote mining when I DIDN'T QUOTE ANYONE?

Would someone fluent in retard be so kind as to translate the Raging Diaper's comment into English?

Oh, the chestnut thigh-splitters of the self-congratulatory debunker cult. (Cue Dorothy the ultra-nationalist kookloon with his own arsenal of dull repetitions)

It's pretty clear, to me at least, that you don't understand the definition of "quote mining". After all, shit-for-brains, how can I be guilty of quote mining when I DIDN'T QUOTE ANYONE?Ha ha ha! What a pitiful excuse! Didn't you link to a quote? Why did you link then? So we wouldn't click on it? What was the damn point huh? You're a weasel and coward, and you're trying to put a spin on your defeat.

The Raging Diaper lies, "...Ha ha ha! What a pitiful excuse! Didn't you link to a quote? Why did you link then? So we wouldn't click on it? What was the damn point huh? You're a weasel and coward, and you're trying to put a spin on your defeat."

Do you ever stop lying, Glenn?

I formatted a hyperlink into my post. That's not a quote--you fucking moron.

Furthermore, my hyperlink does not point to a quote--you illiterate jackass. The hyperlink points to a section of the Wikipedia entry for Moon that deals specifically with his "Founding The Washington Times".

Shit-for-brains scribbles, "...Could somebody please translate that from sheeple to English for me?"

It's simple, stupid.

You have the unmitigated gall to accuse others of resorting to logical fallacies, yet, you fail to grasp the meaning of quote mining, which is proof positive that you're a idiot.

For your information, jackass, in order to be guilty of quote mining, one must quote someone out of context in order to misrepresent their argument ("Pull it" is a perfect example of quote mining, by the way).

The fact is that not one word of my comment is a quotation. Moreover, anyone with an IQ in excess of room temperature (which apparently excludes you, Glenn) can tell you that a hyperlink is not a quote.

I have an extreme disliking for people who stalk 9/11 family members and tell them to commit suicide, and the blogs that facilitate those people.

What the hell are you talking about?

Blogs that encourage anti-dissent, and cloak state worship in so-called "skepticism".

Give me a break. This blog debunks nonsense that you yourself know to be nonsense. The only sticking point I've heard you articulate thus far is about WTC7 and some (irrelevant) details in the NIST report. And now you're calling people "sheeple?"

And for the record, the Washington Times is owned by the right-wing anti-communist Reverend Moon. http://www.cjr.org/resources/index.php?c=newsworld

Actually, they have. When Fat Alex did his stunt Obama/Charlie Sheen interview, which many a troofer believed was real, we remarked at how obsessed the troofers were with the size of Charlie Sheen's balls. Roid, do you have a view on Charlie Sheen's balls?

I'd say much of the smaller news items are out the last bit at the bottom.

What an embarrassment.

Looks like no-one from a nutty cult leader might be more sympathetic.

I'm kept awake at night by the fear that the pimples on my face protrude farther outward than my shriveled little peckerwood. This is why I keep getting rejected by truther girls when I try to dazzle them with my nutty reverse-truther bullshit.

I'm kept awake at night by the fear that the pimples on my face protrude farther outward than my shriveled little peckerwood. This is why I keep getting rejected by truther girls when I try to dazzle them with my nutty reverse-truther bullshit.

Snip. Snip.

Thanks for the impersonation, Roid.I'll take it that you have no view on Charlie's balls. Reverse-truther bullshit? Sorry, you'll have to explain that one.

Sheesh,when you have to provide a definiyion for your too clever by half and arch nerdy insult "mong",you've been exposed as a ridiculous twat.Gee,that's a really devastating diss Soldier Sad Sack!! Ouch,got me! You're the ex-soldier who gets laid all the time,right Bozo? Pathetic sot.