01:31:543 (527,528) - maybe emphasize string run slightly by making this kdd- actually maybe kkd considering that is the pattern usually used in this map

Muzukashii

00:22:928 (59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67) - maybe try to replace some d with k in here, it feels really monotonous as it is right now, while there is a bit of variation in the song, and its not like it would be too much of a concern for difficultyoverall seems pretty solid, only ddd/kkk patterns for 1/4 for relatively simple to play diff

Futsuu

00:07:543 (5) - maybe kSeems ok... I really can't mod lower diffs well, I can't tell how much would be too much for the difficulty to be fine

01:31:543 (527,528) - maybe emphasize string run slightly by making this kdd- actually maybe kkd considering that is the pattern usually used in this map kats are meant to be the snare idk thing you hear, dons are just filler

Muzukashii

00:22:928 (59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67) - maybe try to replace some d with k in here, it feels really monotonous as it is right now, while there is a bit of variation in the song, and its not like it would be too much of a concern for difficulty changed non-triplets to koverall seems pretty solid, only ddd/kkk patterns for 1/4 for relatively simple to play diff

Futsuu

00:07:543 (5) - maybe k done on 00:07:235 (4) - with higher vocal pitch supportSeems ok... I really can't mod lower diffs well, I can't tell how much would be too much for the difficulty to be fine its fine dw i won't kill you

00:22:312 (110,112,116) - a bit confusing to hear them different. You make this part vocal related, but instrumental is also loud here to not be considered. If you map here vocal, then 00:22:774 (112) - kat here doesn't suit the part. He emphasize nothing, only instrumental.

01:23:235 - if i were you, i wouldn't make here a gap cause of loudness' growing up. Something like kat will follow this growing. Partially disagree, the buildup is too faint to be really noticeable. If more people complain about it, I will surely add a kat.

Oni

00:17:389 - so loud sound to not be mentioned, imo. Kat maybe? It won't break overall density of this part. The lack of note is to separate these patterns, as I didn't want to have something too long.

00:22:312 (110,112,116) - a bit confusing to hear them different. You make this part vocal related, but instrumental is also loud here to not be considered. If you map here vocal, then 00:22:774 (112) - kat here doesn't suit the part. He emphasize nothing, only instrumental. I've changed the dkd to a single d where the k used to be (1/1 doesn't flow well)

00:33:389 - here you can put don for filling the echo of vocal before. There's no real echo here

00:37:697 (196) - kat for better reading and emphasizing of vocal? But now i see, that all that vocal spots in this part are dons, so...Unnecessary to fix. Yeah, most vocal parts are confined to don (but honestly it's just a coincidence), but dkkdd will make the pattern weirder - even if it's accurate to vocal parts, I don't want potentially awkward patterns.

00:41:697 - don't think, that you should lose that sound. Don here will be great. Pluse next, you have it 00:46:312 - in this part. The lack of note is voluntary, to clash the intensities between both parts more than putting 1/2 doubles right away. When they appear later, they are building up to the tatoe.

01:07:774 - to emphasize stream ending and beginning of new part, you can make here a gap. yeah good catch, the following note has been changed to k (subject to change)

01:01:158 (306) - dkd doesn't sound fitting to me at this spot. as a suggestion, I'd make this triplet ddd and 01:01:697 (310,311,312) - kkd. I found that to be following the melody nicely, but maybe you find something better?

01:20:005 (446) - seeing you used more finishers in this diff compared to the others, consider adding a finish here too?

01:01:158 (306) - dkd doesn't sound fitting to me at this spot. as a suggestion, I'd make this triplet ddd and 01:01:697 (310,311,312) - kkd. I found that to be following the melody nicely, but maybe you find something better? i'm just gonna put ddd on both, i don't like the second kkd idea (but in retrospect dkd wasn't that good)

01:20:005 (446) - seeing you used more finishers in this diff compared to the others, consider adding a finish here too? but the muzukashii one was a fuckup....................... i cri