Cover art, photos and screenshots

Reviews

"There are certain rules that one must abide by in order to create a successful sequel. Number one: the body count is always bigger. Number two: the death scenes are always much more elaborate - more blood, more gore - carnage candy."

Grossing in excess of 15 times its production budget at the box office, 1996's Scream proved that life still remained in the ailing slasher genre. Nat... read more

Having loved Scream and that the story had been told, personally I thought that a sequel wasn't really needed, but that is what we have got. Expectations were neither high nor low, and there was bound to be something new in this one that we hadn't discovered in the predecessor. Did Scream 2 reach up to the masterful standard of the first film? Definitely not! Like most sequels that don't have a fo... read more

Not so long ago, I saw the 4th installment of this franchise. I had some rather low expectations but I heard here and there that it was actually pretty good so I thought I should give it a try. Eventually, I thought it was terribly disappointing and, in my opinion, it was really not worth re-launching this franchise 10 years later. Personally, I really loved the first installment, it is a genuine ... read more

Update feed

"
The Ups: It is not that bad a sequel as sequels go as it continues the story with the same (surviving) cast and continue to give us memorable homages and recreated moments from old slasher and giallos. The first scene that comments on the role of dark-skinned characters in this genre is one of the highlights.
The Downs: The need of recycling the killer formula of the original instead of going with something a little more inspired. The unwillingness of surprising us with a few shocking twists"

"After reinvigorating the teen slasher genre with the first Scream, the second one features vociferous success in terms of both script and box office. Showing that when it comes to this type of usually overwrought sharp edged thriller, screaming twice can be just as nice.
Unfortunately, on the flip side, this first sequel of the franchise is also what began the massive resurgence of the endless multitude of blood screaming sequels that tend to extend endlessly passed the third installments to th"

“Not so long ago, I saw the 4th installment of this franchise. I had some rather low expectations but I heard here and there that it was actually pretty good so I thought I should give it a try. Eventually, I thought it was terribly disappointing and, in my opinion, it was really not worth re-launching this franchise 10 years later. Personally, I really loved the first installment, it is a genuine classic, but all the sequels were disappointing. The point is that the ideas developed in ‘Scream’ were quite intriguing but there was no way it would work with some sequels. The first issue was to let the main cast survive all along. It kills a lot of the momentum. Then, you have the twist(s) which was pretty cool the first time around but those became really predictable and above all really ” read more

"Sidney
Sidney, having survived the killer/s from the first movie, made it to college. No longer naive, she fears there may be a copycat killer out to torment her.
Now, an emotional wreck and suffering from severe PTSD, she's willing to defend herself against anyone she even remotely suspects as being a killer. Even damaged as she is, she is more capable than ever before.
Ask this bitch if fucking with Sidney was a good idea.
"

"REWATCHED
"There are certain rules that one must abide by in order to create a successful sequel. Number one: the body count is always bigger. Number two: the death scenes are always much more elaborate - more blood, more gore - *carnage candy*. And number three: never, ever, under any circumstances, assume the killer is dead."
@ Blu-ray
Like the quote says, more deaths and more gore. It's definitely solid as a simple, somewhat entertaining slasher-flick. But it is still a bit disappointing. "