On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:05:59PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:24:52 -0800
> Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmx.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, January 01, 2013 22:31:32 Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
> > > > Understatement of the year. :-P
> > >
> > > Already? Wow.
> >
> > LOL.
> >
> > Well, it's actually very easy to make the understatement of the year
> > when there have been very few understatements already made. The
> > question is whether it will _stay_ the understatement of the year,
> > but knowing Nick, it probably will. ;)
> >
> > - Jonathan M Davis
>
> lol, probably right ;)
>
> At least it isn't flash though, I'll give JS that much credit at
> least. (But then flash seems to be nearly dead now anyway, or at least
> flash player, so FWIW...)
Really?? I thought youtube still uses Flash. I'm no fan of youtube, but
it *is* a significant data point, considering that some people are
actually making a living off homemade videos posted on youtube.
> In any case, we're D, we're systems/native, I think we can do much
> better than Disqus, and I submit Vibe.d/DFeed/etc as evidence that
> settling for Disqus is below us.
Yeah what about plain old HTML submit forms? One can always spice it up
with JS to replace the HTTP POST with the newfangled AJAX stuff, for
when the user has JS turned off. (It'd be hard to justify the additional
effort, though, unless Nick volunteers to write the code. ;-P)
T
--
Written on the window of a clothing store: No shirt, no shoes, no service.

Almost all YouTube videos are HTML5-ready.
> Really?? I thought youtube still uses Flash. I'm no fan of
> youtube, but
> it *is* a significant data point, considering that some people
> are
> actually making a living off homemade videos posted on youtube.

>> We also have a wiki, and the existing links to it on each page.
>
> We've had that for a while, wasn't successful.
It is not obvious where to find the new wiki entering dlang.org.
There is no link to it from dlang.org in the menu under community
and the comments link at the bottom of each page leads to the old
wiki.
In my opinion, it should be given a chance with the intended
integration in place before drawing any conclusions.

On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 at 18:06:00 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
> In any case, we're D, we're systems/native, I think we can do
> much
> better than Disqus, and I submit Vibe.d/DFeed/etc as evidence
> that
> settling for Disqus is below us.
So, livefyre then? ;) Agree with Nick and Vladimir fwiw, Disqus
and its competition are beneath dlang. Always funny to see the
cycle with these free commenting widgets: they raise millions
from dumb VCs, never bother to make any money, start furiously
selling user data
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disqus#Criticism_and_privacy_concerns),
then go bust as everybody leaves. Well, I guess that's every
dot.com nowadays, Facebook and Google
(http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324731304578193781852024980.html)
are on step 3 atm.