Paige Urges New Focus on International EducationEducation Week, November 27, 2002
By Michelle R.Davis

Washington

The United States must look beyond its borders to seek new ideas in learning,
information to bring home to students, and
strong educational relationships with other countries, Secretary of Education
Rod Paige said in a speech last week.

The speech, though short of specific proposals and details about funding,
nonetheless was a significant and much-needed rhetorical foray outside U.S.
education borders, according to groups that work in the field overseas and those
that promote international education in the United States.

Mr. Paige's ideas were "like Mom and apple pie to us," said Christine Vogel, the
vice president of AFS Intercultural Program/USA, formerly the American Field
Service, a New York City-based group that promotes cultural exchange.
"We're thrilled to hear Secretary Paige espousing and encouraging the kinds of
things we've been doing since our
founding. "

During the Nov. 20 speech, given to celebrate International Education Week, Mr.
Paige said the Department of Education would make new efforts to seek close
educational ties with other countries and participate in international projects
and studies. The goal is to increase U.S. students' knowledge about other
regions, cultures, languages, and international issues, as well as to share
information about U.S. education policies with other countries.

In today's world, education must reach across the world, Mr. Paige said. Ongoing
concerns about terrorist attacks mean
students must become more attuned to international issues, the secretary said.

"On Sept. 11, 2001, the world changed, and our role in it changed," Mr. Paige
said. "No longer can we afford to focus only on the domestic."

Despite that need, recent studies, including one released last week by the
National Geographic Society, show American
students lagging significantly when it comes to their knowledge of current
events and geography. ("Afghanistan? Young
Americans Can't Find It on Map, Survey Finds," this issue.)

"International education shouldn't be an add-on," Mr. Paige said. "International
content can be integrated into the teaching of many subjects."

He cited, in particular, dual-language immersion programs, which include lessons
taught in two languages.

Mr. Paige in the speech did not address the possibility of increasing American
aid for the education of children in poorer
countries, a proposal that a group called the Basic Education Coalition has been
urging on Congress in recent months.
("Congress Mulls Aid for Education Overseas," Sept. 18, 2002.)

Secretary Paige said schools should emphasize international education throughout
students' K-12 years, rather than limit
such exposure to high school and college.

That is a new and welcome emphasis, said Michael H. Levine, the executive
director for the New York City-based Asia Society's National Campaign for
International Education in the Schools. Mr. Paige gave last week's speech to the
first-ever gathering of the States Institute on International Education in the
Schools, a coalition of 22 U.S. states convened by the Asia Society.

"If you think about most of the major problems—the spread of weapons of mass
destruction, solving health crises, or managing world conflicts—it's going to
require that students have a greater knowledge of regions, cultures and
languages," Mr. Levine said.

The reauthorization of the Higher Education Act, which Congress is scheduled to
take up next year, provides an opportunity to link universities and K-12 schools
more closely, said Lenore Y. Garcia, the director of the international-affairs
division at the Education Department.

Working Together

The department plans to look closely at Title XI within the Higher Education
Act, which supports the development of foreign-language and geographic regional
study with grants. In the future, colleges and universities could apply for
grants in partnership with K-12 schools to promote cooperative international
education programs on all levels, Ms. Garcia
suggested.

"If the K-12 schools are not in on the planning from the beginning, any outreach
[by colleges and universities] may or may not be meeting their needs," she said.

But Ms. Garcia said many of the details for Mr. Paige's proposals had not been
worked out. New funding, in particular, remains up in the air, she said. The
fiscal 2003 appropriations bill that includes education was among a number of
spending bills that, although the new budget year began nearly two months ago,
have yet to make it through Congress. Lawmakers instead voted last week to
extend fiscal 2002 spending levels into January.

There are opportunities to increase funding for international education programs
within the fiscal 2003 appropriations
legislation, Ms. Garcia said.

But others worried that while Mr. Paige's proposals were important, paying for
them would be difficult.

"He didn't talk about how they might pay for all this increased attention, but
let's hope there will be resources to do more," said Stephen F. Moseley, the
president and chief executive officer of the Academy for Educational
Development. The nonprofit organization, based in New York City, works on
international and American education issues.

Mr. Paige, scheduled to be in Mexico this week to swap education ideas with his
Mexican counterpart, also said this year he will begin honoring one teacher
annually for his or her outstanding efforts to help students grasp world issues
and
cultures.