.@TwitterSafety posted a hypocritical statement on the ban, alluding to ‘past violations’ of Twitter rules, even though @Jack Dorsey was previously forced to defend Twitter not having banned Jones by stating outright that Jones had not violated Twitter policy.

Essentially, in suspending #Jones, Twitter is attempting to have its cake and eat it too – but in doing so, the company exposes the enforcement of its rules as both arbitrary and political. This must raise the alarm among those who value free speech in the dawn of a digital age.

To break this hypocrisy down, we note that Twitter claims it does not engage in politically motivated censorship by explaining that the reason they had not banned Jones in early August hinged on the fact that Jones had not broken Twitter’s rules.

Then, arguing that the permanent suspension of Jones’s Twitter account was likewise not politically motivated, @TwitterSafety reverses this position, arguing that the ban resulted from not only a recent infringement of Twitter’s rules but also hinged on “past violations.”

So - if the latest from @TwitterSafety is to be believed, one might argue that @jack had been protecting Jones based on favoritism despite having violated rules. Or, the latest statement is an attempt to cover Twitter's ass for politically censoring dissidents.

In this way, Twitter reveals that its suspension of Jones – and its censorship policy in general – is motivated by political expediency and pressure from the same authorities that interrogated Dorsey on his reasons for refusing to ban Jones just days prior.

This article - like most of our work at Disobedient Media - is also available on @Steemit, in case of censorship. 😅

"That study has been the subject of some controversy, although mostly built on conflating the findings with various interpretations of them, and with reporting on the study conducted by third parties."

.@jack I mean, come on. How long did you think you and your politically biased staff could continue with this practice of engaging in politically motivated censorship of people on this platform before it got the attention of Congress?

.@jack Any protection your company got from claiming it was a completely politically neutral platform is about to be justifiably and deservedly stripped away.

Nice going! Your shareholders are going to LOVE the fact you and your staff caused this to happen.

The Progressive censors who think they are tilting the ongoing culture war in their favor by censoring Conservative customers on Twitter & Facebook are in for a huge surprise. Not only can they not stop what's coming, their censorship is going to backfire on them massively.

Not only has the illegal censorship Twitter/FB engages in gotten Trump & Sessions' attention, there's going to be well publicized cases like this one:

The tech nerds can't win. When they get caught engaging in POLITICALLY MOTIVATED CENSORSHIP - and they're going to, bet on it - they are going to be subject to massive lawsuits and these companies will lose millions.

#BREAKING : @Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to testify before House Energy and Commerce Committee.
...
"When decisions about data and content are made using opaque processes, the American people are right to raise concerns," Committee Chair Greg Walden says. abcn.ws/2PBhWzZ

Is Shareblue, which is closely tied to Hillary Clinton, (which The New York Times dubbed ‘Hillary Clinton’s Outrage Machine’ in 2016, an organization owned by Clintonite David Brock 👉🏼 behind the recent surge in social media censorship and suppression? disobedientmedia.com/2018/08/ongoin…

If it is a Clintonite/Democratic Party strategy to censor and suppress critics of Clintonites and challenges to assertions by the Clintonite aligned Deep State elite and their media 👉🏼That illustrates that the undemocratic Democratic Party is into totalitarianism, not democracy

Management of Social media platforms with a pro-Clintonite, pro-Deep State bias who are censoring and suppressing views they don’t like;
👉🏼are also showing themselves to be pro-Totalitarianism; not pro-Democracy.