Looks right to me also. s/opendoc/OpenDoc [1] and s/ola/OLE [2]
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDoc
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_Linking_and_Embedding
-t
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Greg Billock <gbillock@google.com> wrote:
> Looks right to me.
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
>> On 5/8/12 1:11 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>
>> Greg, Tantek, All - I think there is an error in this part of the draft Web
>> Intents minutes:
>>
>> [[
>> http://www.w3.org/2012/05/01-webapps-minutes.html#item06
>>
>>
>> tantek:do you know about opendoc and ola?
>> ... systems for applications doing this. Have you looked at that?
>>
>> gbillock:nope
>> ... there is IPR in that area that should be looked at.
>> ... (I know because I did some of it)
>> ]]
>>
>> Only part of Greg's quote above should be attributed to him and the rest
>> should be attributed to Tantek. More specifically, here is what I believe is
>> what they said in this exchange:
>>
>> [[
>> http://www.w3.org/2012/05/01-webapps-minutes.html#item06
>>
>>
>> tantek:do you know about opendoc and ola?
>> ... systems for applications doing this. Have you looked at that?
>>
>> gbillock:nope
>>
>> tantek: there is IPR in that area that should be looked at.
>>
>> ... (I know because I did some of it)
>> ... I felt I had an obligation to make that disclosure
>> ]]
>>
>> Tantek, Greg and Others - what is your recollection on this exchange? Is my
>> correction above accurate?
>>
>> -Thanks, Art
>>