Hats off to Larry King. He may be doing more for U.S. government disclosure of the truth about what the government knows about UFOs than anyone else (except maybe Dr. Steven Greer). His CNN show is very high profile and primetime and he has had the courage to do several very open-minded shows on the subject during this year. Often broadcasters make fun of sightings and credible witnesses in such a way that others, fearing for their reputation, do not come forth.

His courage has had a snowballing effect. Now Astronaut Edgar Mitchell declared that our government has definite knowledge of UFOs and their extraterrestrial occupants. “I happen to have been privileged enough to be in on the fact that we’ve been visited on this planet and the UFO phenomena is real,” Dr Mitchell said. “It’s been well covered up by all our governments for the last 60 years or so, but slowly it’s leaked out and some of us have been privileged to have been briefed on some of it. I’ve been in military and intelligence circles, who know that beneath the surface of what has been public knowledge, yes – we have been visited. Reading the papers recently, it’s been happening quite a bit.”

Larry King recently aired a show wherein former government employees admitted that they had seen UFOs (in several different incidents) and that those UFOs interacted with our weapon systems, effectively shutting some of them down.

In another related story, a follow-up to the Stephenville Lights saga, a former government aeronautic investigator (notably on the downed flight 800), Glen Schultze, analyzed the radar returns for the sightings at Stephenville and discovered that there was a large object without the requisite radar beacons required on all government, commercial, and private aircraft. Perhaps coincidentally, that object appeared to be headed toward Crawford, TX.

Add to this that the Vatican astronomer, Reverend José Gabriel Funes, head of the Vatican Observatory and a scientific adviser to Pope Benedict XVI, referring to life on other planets, has made the pronouncement that there may exist “extraterrestrial brothers” who are more advanced than humans, and that these beings may have been created without “original sin”. May I be the first to say that if I come across an “extraterrestrial brother” in my travels, perhaps the very last thing that I, personally, will be thinking about is whether he was created without “original sin”.

Advertisements

Share this:

Like this:

Related

10 Responses to “On the Road to Disclosure?”

Larry King actually went so far as do do a live remote broadcast nationally televised from Rachel, Nevada Little A-Le-Inn. At least 7 years ago. I’ve been there on few occasions before the government took back the closest view points to area 51 and made the view points off limits. I played a joke on the Camo Dudes who observe your movements. Actually they are Wackenhut Security agents. I refer to them as Wackenoff Security. Anyway the trick I played on them was to take 4 pears spray painted grey with almond shaped black eyes into which I inserted a pop sicle stick and made a sign U.S. Out of North America They went hysterical as we observed them observing us…Ben Dover…

Dear David,
Yes, it is impossible to overestimate the attention Larry King has brought to the field of UFO investigation. If “Disclosure” happens he will be forever remembered as one of the prime movers.
Sounds like you had some fun at Area 51.
Best,
Fahrusha

I agree that Larry is helping promote the cause of UFO investigations. The only thing I don’t like when he does these shows is that he always has a so called UFO skeptic on it. Plus, they have these silly graphics of UFO’s or spacemen.

It is totally distracting when these skeptic guys are on there questioning it all and the graphics turns it into a circus.

I think that the majority of people in this country believe we are being visited and that UFO’s are true. They are like me and want to hear some serious discussions about them.

Hi Dan,
I honestly don’t understand the need for the silly graphics either. I do understand Larry King wanting to put on a skeptic to balance the viewpoints. There is a difference between a skeptic and a debunker. Skepticism is good in that you need to examine what is being presented in a discerning manner. Debunking is a nasty debating tactic whereby you attempt to make a fool of the person presenting the evidence. Genuine skeptics are neutral and simply want to see more proof. If I hadn’t seen a UFO myself, I might be interested but skeptical. I am still skeptical of some accounts, but I’d never call the experiencer a liar.
Seth Shostak of S.E.T.I. is a skeptic, but I’d have to say Bill Nye came across more like a debunker. They were both on the King show. Although Nye has an aeronautics degree, he makes his living as an entertainer. There’s nothing wrong with that, but if Larry has a skeptic on I’d rather it be a neutral scientist like Shostak. Nye was rude to Dr. Edgar Mitchell, a moon walking astronaut and American hero, on the show. Apparently Nye wanted to be an astronaut but was rejected by NASA.
On another note about UFOs, there is an interesting Op-Ed piece in the New York Times today by Nick Pope: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/opinion/29pope.html
My comment is #56
🙂
Thanks for your comment Dan. It is really appreciated.
Best,
Fahrusha

Unfortunately I missed this past Edgar Mitchell interview on Larry. I was referring to the past shows.

I think that the subject now is such mainstream that you don’t need to balance it out with skeptics or debunkers.

Usually, the media makes fun of UFO’s making the people who see them out to be hayseeds or morons. Now notice when they talk about religion it is portrayed as a sacred type of thing.

So who is more crazy? People who go worship a God at 11 AM every Sunday. The God who loves you but is ready to through you into an eternal hell if you screw up? The God who is always broke and needs money?

Or is the person more crazy who is innocently driving on a highway sees lights and a spinning object?

I really think that religion needs more debunking and skeptics instead of the UFO phenomenom.

Some of my thoughts were borrowed from the late, great George Carlin who had an interest in UFO’s too.

Hi Dan,
We are agreed. No debunkers need be heard from. King, as a journalist, however, may wish to maintain the impartial face, which in fact is GOOD for disclosure. Holding an impartial position, King will be taken more seriously by individuals who are not experiencers. What he presents on the show will also be given more weight if he is not viewed as a “true believer”.
Thanks for your comment,
Fahrusha

LANCER was going to make a full disclosure of UFO phenemonon in November of 1963 but for an intervention by the CIA. LANCER had told Norma Jeane the truth early on in August 1962 which also led to an Intervention.Ben