I was in a political chatroom last night. Of course, I tend to make race and issue since it's hopelessly intertwined with politicts. The subject of race and welfare came up. Needless to say, I was prepared this time. Of course once presented with the evidence, the leftist morons immediately accused my source of being biased and called me "racist scum." It's a government source! I do want to say that I received some support from a few and referred them here to Stormfront.

Anyway, Back to the issue. Please note that between 1992 and 2002, the percentages of White families continues to drop. Whereas, Black families have either risen or stayed the same. Additionally, you'll notice that Hispanics have been increasing for the most part. It's only logical to assume that their numbers will surpass (if they already haven't) Blacks, as their population continues to grow (Blacks have been surpassed by Hispanics as the largest minority). Whites comprise roughly 67 percent of the United States population, yet White families only account for roughly 31.6 percent of those receiving welfare. Blacks and Hispanic account for roughly 28 percent of the U.S. Population, yet account for roughly 63 percent of all of the families on welfare.

Many egalitarians will argue that more Whites are on welfare. This is true by when you view it in terms of sheer numbers. Afterall, there are far more Whites. However, from a per capita standpoint, Whites are far less likely to be on welfare than non-Whites, as the chart below clearly illustrates. Please bookmark the link below and refer to Table 3 for future reference.

Again, the "antis" and egalitarians use selective interpretation to try and give their inherently flawed arguments validity. Who's paying the bulk of non-White welfare? You are, White Man.

I was in a political chatroom last night. Of course, I tend to make race and issue since it's hopelessly intertwined with politicts. The subject of race and welfare came up. Needless to say, I was prepared this time. Of course once presented with the evidence, the leftist morons immediately accused my source of being biased and called me "racist scum." It's a government source! I do want to say that I received some support from a few and referred them here to Stormfront.

Anyway, Back to the issue. Please note that between 1992 and 2002, the percentages of White families continues to drop. Whereas, Black families have either risen or stayed the same. Additionally, you'll notice that Hispanics have been increasing for the most part. It's only logical to assume that their numbers will surpass (if they already haven't) Blacks, as their population continues to grow (Blacks have been surpassed by Hispanics as the largest minority). Whites comprise roughly 67 percent of the United States population, yet White families only account for roughly 31.6 percent of those receiving welfare. Blacks and Hispanic account for roughly 28 percent of the U.S. Population, yet account for roughly 63 percent of all of the families on welfare.

Many egaitarians will argue that more Whites are on welfare. This is true by when you view it terms of sheer numbers. Afterall, there are far more Whites. However, from a per capita standpoint, Whites are far less likely to be on welfare than non-Whites, as the chart below clearly illustrates. Please bookmark and refer to Table 3 for future reference. again, the "antis" and egalitarians use selective interpretation to try and give their inherently flawed arguments any validity.

This is a very typical argument from blacks. They will almost always refer to 'numbers' when it suits their argument, however, they normally always stay away from percentages. I've heard this argument about prision population. But, in their defense, it's not easy to make such a pathetic race look not so pathetic!!

Whites comprise roughly 67 percent of the United States population, yet White families only account for roughly 31.6 percent of those receiving welfare. Blacks and Hispanic account for roughly 28 percent of the U.S. Population, yet account for roughly 63 percent of all of the families on welfare.

Wouldn't you have to compare the amount of Whites below the poverty level to blacks below the poverty level to accurately infer which racial group abuses welfare more?

If I'm reading those stats right, then your thread title is a misnomer - there are still more whites on welfare than blacks.

Not per capita. When viewed from a per capita standpoint, Whites are far less likely to be on welfare. Remember, roughly 63 percent of all families on welfare are Hispanics and Blacks, yet they account for only roughly 28 percent of the total population in contrast to Whites comprising roughly 67 percent of the population, and only accounting for roughly 31.6 percent of all families receiving welfare. I clarified a common misconception or lie perpetrated by egaitarians. They claim that there are more Whites on welfare. Of course, there are. We outnumber non-Whites by about 2.5 to 1. Howerver, as I said, Whites are far less likely to be on welfare than non-Whites when we view things based on per capita.

The point I'm trying to make is, egalitarians accuse us of manipulating statistics to give our arguments validity. The fact of the matter is, that's exactly what they do. That is if they even have any statistics to work with, which they usually don't based on my personal experiences in debating or discussing issues with them.

Sure, they can say, "more Whites are on welfare than Blacks." That's a very misleading and defamatory statement based on selective interpretation of statistics. That's if they're even drawing their conclusions from any point of reference (not usually). I simply won't tolerate that nonsense from them. That's why I encourage people to be objective and view things from all perspectives before drawing any conclusions.

I titled the thread the way I did to deliberately provoke the "anits' and egalitarians into reading it. In all reality, the title is not at all misleading.Per capita being the key word here. So far, I haven't seen any "antis" or egalitarians respond. Including Professor Blazak (an egalitarian Professor of Sociology at Portland University) from the "Racist Tricks" thread. Why? Because they don't have an argument. It proves my point.