[CANON11] referencing to <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-c14n11-20080502/>
only talks about c14n and not c12n.

If this is not a flaw but done purposely, there should be a not about it.

I could not find the original definitions for xmlc12n11 and xmlc14n11.
They are not in the referenced document.
(And google only shows copies of this rfc.)

For stability reasons it may be better to not change/correct this, as it may be already in use.
So a note about this discrepance may be appropriate. Or a reference to the document defining those uris.

Errata ID: 4004

Status: Reported
Type: Technical

Reported By: Frederick Hirsch
Date Reported: 2014-05-29

Section 2.3.11 says:

2.3.11. RSA-SHA224
Identifier:
http://www.w3.org/2007/05/xmldsig-more#rsa-sha224
This implies the PKCS#1 v1.5 padding algorithm [RFC3447] as described
in Section 2.3.1, but with the ASN.1 BER SHA-224 algorithm designator
prefix. An example of use is
<SignatureMethod
Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/xmldsig-more#rsa-sha224" />
Because it takes about the same effort to calculate a SHA-224 message
digest as it does a SHA-256 message digest, it is suggested that
RSA-SHA256 be used in preference to RSA-SHA224 where possible.

It should say:

2.3.11. RSA-SHA224
Identifier:
http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmldsig-more#rsa-sha224
This implies the PKCS#1 v1.5 padding algorithm [RFC3447] as described
in Section 2.3.1, but with the ASN.1 BER SHA-224 algorithm designator
prefix. An example of use is
<SignatureMethod
Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmldsig-more#rsa-sha224" />
Because it takes about the same effort to calculate a SHA-224 message
digest as it does a SHA-256 message digest, it is suggested that
RSA-SHA256 be used in preference to RSA-SHA224 where possible.

Notes:

RFC 6931 should be corrected to use the same identifier for RSA-SHA224 as is used in the W3C Recommendation "XML Signature Syntax and Processing Version 1.1? normative section 6.4.2 ( http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-xmldsig-core1-20130411/#sec-PKCS1 ).

This same identifier is also specified in the W3C Note "XML Security Algorithm Cross-Reference? section 3.2 ( http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-xmlsec-algorithms-20130411/#RSA )

At least two shipping code implementations use this value from the W3C Recommendation ; to enable interoperability, avoid confusion and be consistent with the published Recommendation RFC 6931 should be updated to be consistent.

Please note that the revision affects both the identifier URL and the Algorithm attribute value in the 2.3.11 section which is why the entire section is given in the Original and Corrected text above.