You are currently viewing the old forums. We have upgraded to a new NFL Forum. This old forum is being left as a read-only archive.
Please update your bookmarks to our new forum at forums.footballsfuture.com.

I can't really disagree. Thankfully, it's just a small one year deal. It's not the kind of desperation that, if it fails, will set us back years with bad contracts. But yes, our approach to FA this year is 180% opposite of what we've done in prior years. I think Bud Adams is fearing the reaper and desperately trying to capture a title before his time is up._________________

That seems very low to me. Only one year? Has he fallen off that much? Is he that much of a clubhouse cancer? What gives?

I'm not tooting our front office's horn because those numbers also mean no one else was willing to give him even that much. Strange.

Honestly, he's the type of safety that is going to need a very rangy FS next to him. It's why he looked so good with Ed. Pollard struggles in coverage and if there's not a very rangy safety next to him, he can be exposed.

On top of that, he's the kind of guy that will speak first and think second. He doesn't hold back his opinions which can rub some people the wrong way.

I very much enjoyed him while he was here in Baltimore because he complimented Ed very well and "played like a Raven", but at the same time, while I'm surprised he was released, I'm not really saddened by it._________________

[quote="SFPatsFan"]

Flaccomania is a genius who is an expert on literally everything he talks about so you should trust him. [/quote]

That seems very low to me. Only one year? Has he fallen off that much? Is he that much of a clubhouse cancer? What gives?

I'm not tooting our front office's horn because those numbers also mean no one else was willing to give him even that much. Strange.

Honestly, he's the type of safety that is going to need a very rangy FS next to him. It's why he looked so good with Ed. Pollard struggles in coverage and if there's not a very rangy safety next to him, he can be exposed.

On top of that, he's the kind of guy that will speak first and think second. He doesn't hold back his opinions which can rub some people the wrong way.

I very much enjoyed him while he was here in Baltimore because he complimented Ed very well and "played like a Raven", but at the same time, while I'm surprised he was released, I'm not really saddened by it.

He's the kind of guy we needed since losing Finnegan last offseason. A tone-setter. He'll mostly stay in the box and will let Griffin hopefully only play center field and not be forced to embarrass himself by playing the run.

For a low-risk, fairly low-money deal, I love it. Or SS play last year was an absolute disaster and this move just represents or attempt to become the kind of physical team one would expect from a team that is coached by a HOF offensive lineman.

Titans have made a ton of moves this offseason, but none of them (outside of Levitre) are deals that will haunt us a couple years down the road. We're attempting to win this year, which I like. Going to be interesting to see if things come together by the time the regular season gets rolling._________________Props to mike23md on the sig

Wait, so he can lay the lumber, play the run effectively, AND bully people who play bad? This guy might be my new favorite player after he slaps Michael Griffin across the face after our first loss._________________

Wait, so he can lay the lumber, play the run effectively, AND bully people who play bad? This guy might be my new favorite player after he slaps Michael Griffin across the face after our first loss.

If we lose, it won't be because of Griffin. Hell, Griffin might have to slap HIM for his lack of coverage ability.

Might be our best option. Maybe if he tries to slap a teammate he may accidentally knock a running back down instead. Since God knows he can't tackle an opponent on purpose. Bold idea Ruskie. I like it._________________Props to mike23md on the sig