By "parameter" do you mean that the stereotype has a *property* of type
uml::Operation? (i.e., an association to the Operation metaclass)

This feature is supported by the UML editor. You should get a drop-down
list from which to select any existing operation in the resource set (if
it is a single-valued property) or a dialog from which to select
existing operations (if it is a multi-valued property).

Perhaps you can share details of the stereotype definition in your
profile (a snippet of the XMI would be most handy)? Likely we would be
able to see what the problem is ...

Cheers,

Christian

Mauro wrote:
> I defined a stereotype with a parameter of type uml::Operation
> The problem is that when I apply the stereotype it seems impossible to fill
> the parameter value in the property view...
>
> Is this feature supported by the uml editor?
>
> thanks
> Mauro

> This feature is supported by the UML editor. You should get a drop-down
> list from which to select any existing operation in the resource set (if
> it is a single-valued property) or a dialog from which to select
> existing operations (if it is a multi-valued property).
I see... the dialog is there but it is so much larger than the screen that I
can't see anything!
It's the same under Windows and Linux...

Do you have a large number of operations in your resource set? We have
received similar complaints in the past, but have been unable to reproduce
the problem (since the list should simply be scrollable)...

Kenn

"Mauro" <mauro@bglug.it> wrote in message
news:gfpli1$oil$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Christian W. Damus wrote:
>
>> This feature is supported by the UML editor. You should get a drop-down
>> list from which to select any existing operation in the resource set (if
>> it is a single-valued property) or a dialog from which to select
>> existing operations (if it is a multi-valued property).
> I see... the dialog is there but it is so much larger than the screen that
> I
> can't see anything!
> It's the same under Windows and Linux...
>
> Mauro
>
>

Kenn Hussey wrote:
> Do you have a large number of operations in your resource set? We have
> received similar complaints in the past, but have been unable to reproduce
> the problem (since the list should simply be scrollable)...

yes the list is very very long, some resources have a very long name and I
think that the size of the menu is based on the longest wich are

I can see the problem now... very wacky.
Below when you ask ".. is it normal to have *those* operations ..." which
operations are you referring to exactly? You can explicitly load other
resources into your resource set.
Filtering the data would be one possibility, but I really can't see why the
dialog is so large. Perhaps popping up a dialog with some filtering
criteria would be more helpful.

This is definitely an issue.

Cheers,
- James.

"Mauro" <mauro@bglug.it> wrote in message
news:gfse5d$324$1@build.eclipse.org...
>> Please raise a defect on that with a small example to reproduce the issue
>> and it will be addressed.
> I did it
>
> Is it normal to have those operations in the resource set?
> I installed just the default packages...
>
> do you see any workaround (filtering the data somewhere?)
>
> Mauro
>

By "parameter" do you mean that the stereotype has a *property* of type
uml::Operation? (i.e., an association to the Operation metaclass)

This feature is supported by the UML editor. You should get a drop-down
list from which to select any existing operation in the resource set (if
it is a single-valued property) or a dialog from which to select
existing operations (if it is a multi-valued property).

Perhaps you can share details of the stereotype definition in your
profile (a snippet of the XMI would be most handy)? Likely we would be
able to see what the problem is ...

Cheers,

Christian

Mauro wrote:
> I defined a stereotype with a parameter of type uml::Operation
> The problem is that when I apply the stereotype it seems impossible to fill
> the parameter value in the property view...
>
> Is this feature supported by the uml editor?
>
> thanks
> Mauro

> This feature is supported by the UML editor. You should get a drop-down
> list from which to select any existing operation in the resource set (if
> it is a single-valued property) or a dialog from which to select
> existing operations (if it is a multi-valued property).
I see... the dialog is there but it is so much larger than the screen that I
can't see anything!
It's the same under Windows and Linux...

Do you have a large number of operations in your resource set? We have
received similar complaints in the past, but have been unable to reproduce
the problem (since the list should simply be scrollable)...

Kenn

"Mauro" <mauro@bglug.it> wrote in message
news:gfpli1$oil$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Christian W. Damus wrote:
>
>> This feature is supported by the UML editor. You should get a drop-down
>> list from which to select any existing operation in the resource set (if
>> it is a single-valued property) or a dialog from which to select
>> existing operations (if it is a multi-valued property).
> I see... the dialog is there but it is so much larger than the screen that
> I
> can't see anything!
> It's the same under Windows and Linux...
>
> Mauro
>
>

Kenn Hussey wrote:
> Do you have a large number of operations in your resource set? We have
> received similar complaints in the past, but have been unable to reproduce
> the problem (since the list should simply be scrollable)...

yes the list is very very long, some resources have a very long name and I
think that the size of the menu is based on the longest wich are

I can see the problem now... very wacky.
Below when you ask ".. is it normal to have *those* operations ..." which
operations are you referring to exactly? You can explicitly load other
resources into your resource set.
Filtering the data would be one possibility, but I really can't see why the
dialog is so large. Perhaps popping up a dialog with some filtering
criteria would be more helpful.

This is definitely an issue.

Cheers,
- James.

"Mauro" <mauro@bglug.it> wrote in message
news:gfse5d$324$1@build.eclipse.org...
>> Please raise a defect on that with a small example to reproduce the issue
>> and it will be addressed.
> I did it
>
> Is it normal to have those operations in the resource set?
> I installed just the default packages...
>
> do you see any workaround (filtering the data somewhere?)
>
> Mauro
>