Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Friday left open the possibility of House action to punish Rep. Steve King over his history of inflammatory remarks as the Iowa Republican’s recent defense of white nationalism created a firestorm.

“We’ll see what we do about Steve King, but nonetheless nothing is shocking anymore, right?” Pelosi (D-Calif.) told reporters. “The new normal around here is to praise white nationalism as something that shouldn’t be shunned.”

King, who won a ninth term in Congress in November, lamented in an interview with the New York Times that the term had become a pejorative one.

“White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization — how did that language become offensive?” King said in the interview, which was published Thursday.

King later issued a statement and addressed the issue in a speech on the House floor Friday in which he sought to walk back his remarks. He said he rejects “those labels and the evil ideology that they define” and proclaimed himself “simply a Nationalist.”

A number of Democrats are calling on House leaders to consider a resolution to censure King, a vote that would put Republicans on record.

Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) later attempted to walk back his comments to the New York Times defending white nationalism. (J. Scott Applewhite/AP)

“The U.S. House of Representatives must censure Rep. Steve King for his racists remarks,” Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio) tweeted, adding: “Support for white supremacist ideology should have no place in Congress.”

Questioned whether she would take action, Pelosi said, “I’m not prepared to make any announcement about that right now, but needless to say there is interest in doing something.”

King’s interview prompted a rebuke from Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), the No. 3 Republican in the House, who said in a tweet Thursday morning, “These comments are abhorrent and racist and should have no place in our national discourse.”

These comments are abhorrent and racist and should have no place in our national discourse. Steve King asks how terms 'white nationalist' and 'white supremacist' became offensive | TheHill https://t.co/yL23avpNFB

She was soon followed by House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.), who told reporters in a pen-and-pad that it was “offensive to try to legitimize those terms.” But Scalise also praised King’s later statement.

“I think it was important that he rejected that kind of evil, because that’s what it is. It’s evil ideology,” Scalise said.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) also issued a statement Thursday evening in which he sharply criticized King’s comments to the Times.

“Everything about white supremacy and white nationalism goes against who we are as a nation,” McCarthy said. “Steve’s language is reckless, wrong, and has no place in our society. The Declaration of Independence states that ‘all men are created equal.’ That is a fact. It is self-evident.”

Both McCarthy and Scalise were silent in October when asked for comment on incendiary remarks King had made then. At the time, Rep. Steve Stivers (R-Ohio), then the chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, was the only member of House GOP leadership to rebuke King. (Cheney had not yet been elected to her position as conference chair.)

King has a long history of incendiary remarks on race and immigration throughout his time in Congress. In 2017, King was widely criticized after he declared in a tweet that he agreed with far-right Dutch politician Geert Wilders that “our civilization” cannot be restored “with somebody else’s babies.”

The lawmaker’s actions drew increased scrutiny in the wake of last year’s mass shooting at a Pittsburgh synagogue. The massacre, in which 11 people were killed, was the deadliest attack on Jews in the United States.

In June, King prompted criticism when he retweeted a message sent by Mark Collett, a self-described “Nazi sympathizer.” King declined to delete the retweet.

Then, in the fall, King tweeted his support for Faith Goldy, a white nationalist who ran unsuccessfully for Toronto mayor. The Washington Post also reported that King had met in August with members of a far-right Austrian party with historical Nazi ties and declared that “Western civilization is on the decline.”

Despite losing the support of several corporate donors, including Land O’Lakes and Intel, King still bested his Democratic opponent, J.D. Scholten, in November.

The 2020 election may be a more challenging one for King, however.

On Wednesday, Iowa state Sen. Randy Feenstra announced that he will run against King in the Republican primary.

And Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds (R), who backed King during the last campaign and appeared with him on the campaign trail, has said she will not endorse him this time, telling an NBC affiliate in Des Moines that “the last election was a wake-up call for it to be that close.”

Asked Thursday whether the national party will back King in 2020, Scalise declined to weigh in.

“I have no idea what’s happening in terms of primaries right now,” he said.