On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:24:33 -0400, dickl wrote:
>
> Sorry to say, 3.03 is messed up for Windows builds.
Damn! So am I! I forgot to retest this.
> In the linker .rsp file, the libraries are placed on separate lines.
> Optlink wants all the libraries on 1 line with '+' between the lib names.
A quick fix would be to replace lines 1079-1082 in build.d with ...
lCommandLine ~= vLinkLibSwitch ~
util.str.enquote(lLib) ~ vArgFileDelim;
}
}
lCommandLine ~= "\n";
I think this will work but I haven't tested it yet. I'll do that later
today.
--
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
"Down with mediocrity!"

Hasan Aljudy wrote:
>
>
> Gregor Richards wrote:
>
>> Hasan Aljudy wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Gregor Richards wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> GNU/Linux on gdc is version(linux), version(Unix) and
>>>> version(Posix). Mac OS X is version(darwin), version(Unix) and
>>>> version(Posix).
>>>>
>>>> - Gregor Richards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hmm, what does Mac OS X have to do with darwin and Unix?
>>
>>
>> ... Mac OS X is Darwin. Darwin is Unix.
>
>
> Ah! Really?
> I thought darwin was just another linux distribution! hahaha!
>
>>
>> - Gregor Richards
>>
>> PS: Actually, it would be reasonable to remove version(Unix) from
>> GNU/Linux, as GNU's Not Unix, but Mac OS X most certainly is.
>
>
> OK, is it "Darwin is Unix" or is it "Darwin is *a* Unix"?
> Sorry, I don't understand the Unix/Linux/GNU world. <g>
Unix is an entire tree of operating systems, so it would be reasonable
to say "Darwin is *a* Unix". Darwin is a Unix because, if you trace
back its lineage, it has its roots in the original Unixes (SysVR4, BSD,
etc).
And the reason that linux is marked as a Unix is being linux works very
much like a Unix, even though it's not actually based in code on Unix at
all. So while it's technically not a Unix, it acts like one. More so
than Mac OS X, actually ;)
- Gregor Richards

Gregor Richards wrote:
> And the reason that linux is marked as a Unix is being linux works very
> much like a Unix, even though it's not actually based in code on Unix at
> all. So while it's technically not a Unix, it acts like one. More so
> than Mac OS X, actually ;)
And if a Linux-user even considered mentioning Linux and Unix (I mean
*nix :) in the same sentence, SCO would immediately sue them all for
infringing their copyrights/trademarks/patents/etc.
BTW, the patent trolls are again trying to ram through software patents
here in EU. It seems they'll never stop until they get that stupid law.
--
Jari-Matti