Friday, December 11, 2015

These videos show muslim RADICALIZATION, which is routine in Gaza, the Arab controlled parts of Judea and Samaria, and in many MANY mosques and madrassas all over the world - including the West.

... and this...

These types of attacks are coming to a town and city near you UNLESS we do something, and do it NOW.

Here's what I suggest and why:

FDR bombed the munitions factories of the Nazis - and other assets of the Nazi war machine.

If we want to win, then we must do the same, and against this enemy that means eradicating the mosques and madrassas which radicalize muslims.

That means shutting them down if they are within our borders and bombing them to smithereens if they are not.

And it means deporting non-citizen imams who advocate sharia and radicalization, and perhaps jailing citizens who advocate sharia - which is totalitarianism - for sedition: DEPORTING AND JAILING RADICALS ACCORDINGLY IS BOTH LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL UNDER CURRENT AND LONG-HELD/UPHELD FEDERAL LAW.

Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)US Code

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

And it also means we must demand that these mosques and madrassas and imams no longer be funded internationally by enacting sever financial sanctions against people, companies and nations which support them.

AND ANOTHER THING:

Taking guns away from non-radicalized non-muslims will only make us less safe - as the video of the car/hacking attack proves...

The Times of Israel/AFP tells what Paris and France are like now, in the weeks after the tragedy when 130 people were murdered by ISIS supporters within the country:

Bags are searched during mundane grocery shopping, heavily armed police patrol the streets and bomb disposal teams are frequently called to examine “suspect packages” — four weeks on, the jihadist attacks have left Paris a changed city.

This is France at “war” against the Islamic State jihadist group, as a visibly shaken President Francois Hollande said soon after cafe terraces and a concert hall became scenes of carnage on November 13.

The fading photographs tucked in among the shrines of candles and flowers show just how many youthful faces were among the 130 victims that lost their lives while enjoying a night out.

Outside the Bataclan music venue on Friday, workmen scooped up piles of wilted flowers, as even the deep mourning over the attacks must eventually end.

The tourist trade is recovering in the world’s most visited city, but the attacks have left their mark on its residents in a multitude of ways.

“I really pay attention now to people who get on the train with bags,” said Pierre Breard, 24, who works for a start-up in Paris.

“I look at people’s stomachs” for signs they are wearing explosive vests, admitted Aurelie Martin, a 24-year-old primary school teacher. On the night of the attacks, she was forced to file out of the Stade de France with her hands in the air as police frantically searched for more suicide bombers after three blew themselves up outside while France played Germany in a football match.

It's clear that France will not be the same again for a long time.

This article, however, has the gall to take what the father of one of the terrorists said at face value:

When investigators revealed the identity of the third Bataclan attacker on Wednesday, the father of 23-year-old Foued Mohamed-Aggad from Strasbourg did not mince his words.

“I would have killed him myself beforehand,” his father, Said Mohamed-Aggad, told AFP.

I'm not fooled by what the man says. If he'd really wanted his son to lead an honest, non-violent life, he would never have raised him on Islam or allowed any imams to do the raising for him. The AFP flubbed on that one, which is just apologia and refusal to recognize what's wrong with Islamofascism.

Thursday, December 10, 2015

American patriots admire the Founding Fathers. The founders wrote the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and created the first real democratic constitutional republic in all human history. The founders had differences, but shared an overwhelming desire for national self-determination based on cooperation, not coercion, and a desire for limited government.

Patriots who admire Washington and Jefferson and Adams and Henry and Madison and Hamilton do NOT emulate them or seek to emulate them, nor are the Founders held up as saints, prophets, or perfect men in any way.

They are admired and thanked for their good efforts while their character deficits are generally set-aside. Washington and Jefferson were slave-owners, for example, an attribute of these two giants which no patriot admires - or seeks to emulate.

The fact that a billion Muslims admire Mohamed, PBUH is not major a problem for non-muslims.

What is a problem for non-muslims are the many thousands, (or many hundreds of thousands, or perhaps millions of muslims), who seek to emulate their prophet - who seek spread islam by the sword... the sword emblazoned on the flag of the Saudi Kingdom.

This is what motivates the jihado-terrorists. Muslims who emulate their prophet cannot logically be called distorters of islam: if Mohamed PBUH practiced islam using the sword, and since he originated islam, then the using the sword to spread islam and its supremacist teachings cannot be called unislamic.

The chief of ISIS and the Caliphate - al Baghdadi- is a college educated islamic scholar.

If muslims were to teach in all mosques and madrassas and colleges and universities that emulating their prophet was no longer proper, then they might crush jihado-terrorism.

Muslims might be able to do this if they adopted the same attitude toward their prophet as American patriots have toward the founding Fathers - and Jews have toward their Patriarchs: Abraham, Isaac an Jacob. None are considered perfect men whose ancient lives should be now emulated in every way, in our modern age.

If muslims could ever accept - and teach - that what Mohamed, PBUH did then was right for his times, but not right for our times - and that islam's supremacist teachings cannot be spread by coercion now, (even though it has been for the last 1400 years), then I think a reform of islam is possible.

Muslims would have to interpret their holy books prescriptive teachings in ways which are adapted to the contemporary world. They would have to teach that the teachings about their prophet's wars are descriptive, not prescriptive.

This would mean that they would have to teach that Mohamed, PBUH was not perfect for all time, perhaps - for muslims - just in his time.

This should be possible in any God-centered monotheistic faith. For example, Roman Catholics don't worship the Pope, nor do Catholics emulate him - (most marry, for example), though many admire him.

In the Judeo-Christian world, only G-d is perfect; no man is - not even our prophets.

So it could be with Mohamed, PBUH: Muslims could admire and revere him without believing that his life must be emulated or that the most pious muslims are those that live and act as he did.

In a way, this would amount to the de-mohamedanization of islam, and it is not likely to occur, but if it could occur then the jihado-terrorists might be marginalized theologically.

AND ANOTHER THING: one might also argue that since Mohamed, PBUH had neither guns, or bombs, or jets, that jihado-terrorists who use these and other modern weapons, and cellphones, and cars, SUV's, tanks, videos etc - are not emulating him at all.

If I were to see a strong movement within islam - coming from the House of Saud and Al-Azhar University and the Supreme Council of Iran - calling for muslims to halt their emulations of their prophet, then I might start to believe that islam can co-exist with non-muslims.

Short of that, I see no way for humanity to avoid an all out war - and I shudder to think what it will take for it to breakout on all fronts, with no holds barred.... an eventuality we seem to be headed for... because I seriously doubt that the Salafists or Wahhabists or Q'tubists will ever be reformed.... and unless they are soon eradicated, and because their power seems to be growing - and their weapons seem to be getting ever more terrifying - we seem to be headed for the most violent global conflagration of all time...

Sigh...

WB YEATS

THE SECOND COMING

Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: a waste of desert sand;
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Wind shadows of the indignant desert birds.

The darkness drops again but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

Breitbart interviewed a liberal feminist named Joy Brighton who takes the stance that Islam is dangerous, and believes that families of jihadists should be deported from America:

“There’s a few things we should be doing to protect our country,” Brighton said. “When a terrorist kills someone in this country or terrorizes someone in this country, the entire extended family must be deported. That way it is very humane—you just get everybody and you put them on a plane. It’s only the family members, and extended family members, who want to stay in this country who can police their own family members.”

Brighton specifically noted, too, that the United States has yet to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization.

If the family members refused to do anything to keep their offspring from engaging in any kind of terrorist activity, then they are equally guilty, and deserve to be exiled. Here's one liberal who's making sense. Similarly, Donald Trump's own call for a ban on Muslim immigration to the US is an idea that's clearly resonating with many people. And that's because they care about safety. Something the establishment obviously has to consider.

Wednesday, December 09, 2015

More than 70 years have passed since the Tehran Conference. But today, in Russia, the idea of "invincible unity" is being revived and repackaged for a new war: the war on terror."We understand that international terrorism is an international phenomenon and to combat it we need an international coalition," Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk, head of external church relations for the Russian Orthodox Church, tells me.

"During the Second World War, on the one side, there were countries which were very different as far as their political systems were concerned. And yet they were able to put aside these differences in order to combat the plague of fascism. What we need now is the same: to put aside the differences to combat together international terrorism."... In recent weeks, so many of the Russian politicians, officials and religious figures with whom I've spoken have promoted the same message: that Russia and the West should forge a World War Two-style alliance against so-called Islamic State.President Putin has put forward the same idea. Speaking at the United Nations in September, he called for a "genuinely broad alliance against terrorism, just like the one against Hitler".... I [Rosenberg] cannot help thinking that if Roosevelt and Churchill could find a way to work with Stalin, Obama and Cameron can find a way to work with Putin.Perhaps this will only happen, though, when all sides conclude the threat to their nation is so great and imminent that the only way to win the war on terror is to fight together.

FOR AN EFFECTIVE ALLIANCE AGAINST GLOBAL JIHAD ND THE CALIPHATE. THE WEST NEEDS NEW LEADERSHIP, REAL LEADERSHIP.

DOES ANYONE DOUBT THAT AN ALLIANCE OF PRESIDENT TED CRUZ, PM NIGEL FARAGE, PRESIDENT MARINE LE PEN AND PM GEERT WILDERS, AND PRESIDENT PUTIN WOULD BE INFINITELY BETTER AND MORE EFFECTIVE?

I THINK NOT.IN 2017 WE MIGHT GET THREE OUT OF THE ABOVE FOUR: LE PEN, WILDERS, AND CRUZ.(UNFORTUNATELY, BRITAIN IS STUCK WITH CAMERON - LIKE SARKOZY: ALL WORDS AND NO DEEDS, THOUGH IF THEY LEAVE THE EU IT WILL HELP, IMMENSELY...)I PRAY WE DO GET REAL LEADERSHIP.... AND I PRAY IT IS NOT TOO LATE...

Zazi, a native of Afghanistan who lived in Colorado, was arrested and convicted of plotting to bomb the New York City Subway system. He was trained by al-Qaeda in Pakistan. 5 others were also indicted on related charges. " [33]

Colleen LaRose, also known as JihadJane and Fatima LaRose, is an American citizen charged with terrorism-related crimes, including conspiracy to commit murder and providing material support to terrorists. Lars Vilks was a named target in response to drawings of Muhammad.[36]

A Pakistani American who attempted the May 1, 2010, Times Square car bombing. He was arrested after he had boarded Emirates Flight 202 to Dubai. On June 21, 2010, in Federal District Court in Manhattan he confessed to 10 counts arising from the bombing attempt.[38]

Rezwan Ferdaus is a U.S. citizen, born and raised in Massachusetts, of Bangladeshi descent, who was arrested by the FBI on September 28, 2011, for allegedly plotting to attack The Pentagon and United States Capitol with remote-controlled model aircraft packed with explosives. He was also charged with supporting al-Qaeda and plotting attacks on U.S. soldiers abroad, by making IED detonators.[40]

Sami Osmakac is a man who allegedly plotted an attack, to avenge what he felt were wrongs done to Muslims, in the area around Tampa, Florida. Osmakac, an Albanian from Kosovo and a naturalized US citizen, was arrested January 7, 2012, for the alleged attack plan, which involved bombing nightclubs, detonating a car bomb, using an assault rifle, wearing an explosive belt in a crowded area, and taking hostages.[41]

A Moroccan man who was arrested by the FBI)for allegedly plotting to carry out a suicide bombing on the United States Capitol. El Khalifi thought he was working with al-Qaeda operatives, but was actually in contact with undercover FBI agents. He was sentenced to prison for 30 years in September 2012.[42]

A Bangladeshi man was charged with trying to blow up the Federal Reserve building in New York. While Nafis believed he had the blessing of al-Qaeda and was acting on behalf of the terrorist group, he has no known ties, according to federal officials.[43]

The increased pace of attacks and number of successful attacks is directly related to the shutdown of Gitmo and the hampering of the NSA and Obama's "leading from behind" - his appeasement of the enemy.

The numbers prove we are less safe now than in 2008.

We can do better. we need better gun control, bomb-making control - to keep these weapons out of the hands of islamists; this means we need to use PROFILING.

And we need better intel - intel not changed to fit a policy of appeasement or to make political decision by politician look better than they really are (s 50 intel officers/whistle-blowers allege)..

And our nation needs a serious debate on how to do this, with everyone at the table - with the views of Trump and Rand Paul and and Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz and even Bernie Sanders all represented.

Sunday, December 06, 2015

And now for Ron Marz's responses to the week's tragedy, which are about what you could expect - he has used a violent crime alternately as an excuse for gun control advocacy, and to attack conservatives. For example, he said:

Again, there goes an ignoramus spouting off ditherings meant for himself. He must've written that as a vindictive reaction to his own hopes that it would be a right-winger, after every leftarded narrative was refuted. Just who are these people he speaks of? From what I can tell, he means conservatives in the USA, and not Islamofascists overseas. It's also extremely offensive how he implies everyone's "smugly pleased". *Ahem* NOBODY with half a brain is even remotely pleased whenever there's a bloodbath anywhere, and it makes no difference what the ideological background of the criminals is. What matters is that whoever the perpetrators of a violent crime were, they did something repulsive that goes throughly against human values.

Impossible to use Twitter to find updating news on terrorist attack, thanks to hyper-partisan hyperventilating. Suggestion for good info?