Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar

versão On-line ISSN 2078-5135versão impressa ISSN 0256-9574

SAMJ, S. Afr. med. j. vol.101 no.1 Cape Town Jan. 2011

CORRESPONDENCE

Will national health insurance ensure the national health?

To the Editor: The good intentions in the proposed National Health Insurance (NHI) scheme are not doubted, but I suspect that the authorities have not been correctly advised on why the health system is often inadequate.

South Africa's health system provides private health care access to some, but the large majority depends on the state for health services. Private health care appears to offer a better service than state health care because of a lack of adequate state sector infrastructure. However, injecting massive NHI funding into state health will result in a burgeoning bureaucracy and little to improve our citizens' health experience.

Infrastructure, from equipment to health care personnel, is limited in the state health system and patients experience many irritations and inconveniences because of the way it operates.

There is no reason why repeat outpatients cannot have appointments instead of all having to attend the health facility before dawn only to be seen hours later. With appointments the number of patients in a health facility would become more manageable and patients who work would not lose pay by waiting unnecessarily.

Why do patients have to return, often after long journeys, to collect repeat medication instead of accessing it at their nearest state health facility? Private sector prescriptions are on a computer and available at supermarket pharmacies nationwide. State health facilities can use such computer programmes and reduce outpatient and clinic numbers by 30%. And why do supermarkets have better baby-changing facilities than our health facilities, which often do not have any at all?

Patient self-triage is another serious patient-perceived problem. For budgetary and administrative reasons state health services are classified as primary or district, secondary or regional, and tertiary or academic. The family with a sick baby is expected to self-triage the baby into one of these categories. Heaven help them if they appear at a secondary or tertiary hospital with a primary care condition, as they may be denied treatment and referred back. Since when do health facilities turn away patients? Health facilities must recognise that their concept of an emergency differs from that of a lay person and act accordingly!

The state health services have some excellent health practitioners, but there are not enough of them. Most are concentrated in urban areas and medical schools, and although this is unlikely to change, the rural paucity of practitioners could be addressed in part by the following.

Firstly, address the overall numbers of health practitioners in the state services. One cannot buy, but must attract and retain the best personnel. This is not just about money, and the nine provincial health departments and the eight university medical schools must play a role in this joint approach and responsibility. Provinces with medical schools must accept the obligation of providing state-of-theart equipment and consumables to the teaching environment. It is unacceptable that cardiac procedures be delayed because the budget for stents is insufficient, or that patients should suffer long delays because the prosthetic hips budget is exhausted.

Secondly, as part of their co-responsibility for patients the medical schools must recognise that the health department's responsibility for the patients in a teaching hospital extends throughout the province. In recognising this health and teaching continuum the medical schools should co-operate in outreach programmes throughout and across provinces to take treatment to where the patients live, subject to the provinces meeting their equipment obligations. They must also recognise the medical practitioner needs in South Africa and support the front-line health care disciplines of family medicine and emergency medicine.

The present state health system could be remedied by wise investment in real patient care at less than an NHI would cost, and without creating another bureaucracy.