Click on above images to be taken to full standings, boxscores or schedule…

THE GOOD: Andy Sonnanstine vs Josh Beckett. If Beckett faced off against Sonnanstine 10 times, what would the over/under be for Rays wins? 3? 3.5? And yet in his last 2 starts when the Rays needed him most, The Duke delivered against Beckett and the Red Sox. When Sonny is bad, he can be very bad. But when The Duke is on, he can be very, very good…Carlos Pena. Anybody still think that 2007 was a fluke? And last year when everybody was making such a big deal about Pena “using the whole field”, he still never truly went opposite field. He hit a lot of home runs to straight away center or just left of center, something he never did in the past. Well, this season, especially in the second-half, he is using the whole field. Both of his home runs against the Sox in the past week were truly opposite field shots…Dioner Navarro. Of course The Fat Catcher came through with the walk-off ground-rule single, but throwing out Jacoby Ellsbury trying to steal with 1 out in the 8th may have been even bigger. Ellsbury was 48-57 entering the game and if he gets into scoring position at that point, there is a good chance he scores…Finally catching a break. The umpires called time during a swing-and-miss by Carlos Pena in the 9th inning when a ball came out of the Red Sox dugout. It was ruled no-pitch and the next pitch ended up being a ball. Pena would eventually walk on a full-count pitch to make it first and second with no outs….The Yankees tragic number is now 3.

THE BAD: Tonight’s matchup is tilted towards the Red Sox. Matt Garza is coming in on 3-days rest, although he only threw 87 pitches in his last start. He will go head-to-head against Tim Wakefield who is 9-2 with a 2.45 ERA in 22 appearances/16 career starts at the Trop. However, this season he has faced the Rays twice (both at the Trop) and is 0-1 allowing 6 runs (4 earned) in 13 innings.

Brant James notes that a lot of things had to go right in the 9th before Dioner Navarro was even given a chance to win the game. [St. Pete Times]

Bugs and Cranks says these games are more about making statements than about making the playoffs and they feel the Rays are making bigger statements than the Red Sox recently. [Bugs and Cranks]

Tony Fabrizio says the Rays don’t have a “true ace” but says they have 5 guys that are capable of pitching like one. [Tampa Tribune]

OK, this mohawk business is starting to spread. Now half-a-dozen players andJoe Maddon?…And we are all for keeping things loose in the locker room, let’s just hope things don’t get too loose? [MLB] Tampa Bay’s 10 has a picture. [Tampa Bay’s 10]

Brittany Ghiroli notes that the locker and the bullpen are extremely crowded nowadays, but the extra arms in the bullpen have come in handy. [MLB]

You can call it "catching a break," but really it was just the correct call being made. The ball rolled into fair territory and time was called BEFORE the pitch was thrown. Although considering what we've dealt with this year, I can see why that's filed under "catching a break."

So you called Dioner's hit a "ground rule single." Is it scored a single. We had a debate about this last night. It bounced over the wall, so it could be scored a double, were it not for the fact that the game ended once he reached first. It could also be scored an error, since it likely could have been caught (in which case it would have been a sac fly). How are these things scored?

this is basically the same thing that happened to Robin Ventura in the 1999 NLCS for the Mets against the Braves. It was a tied score in the bottom of the 15th inning. The bases were loaded and Ventura hit a grand slam to win the game. He was mobbed by his teammates after rounding first and never made it any farther. Ventura was only credited with a single and the Mets won by 1 run

Essentially all that is required is for Navi to touch first base, forcing the winning run home. In theory, Navi could have kept running and the runner on second could have run home and the Rays would have won by 2 and Navi would have been credited with a double. but they did not do that.

So no error even if it's obvious that the ball could have been caught? I am not sure how close it was with the outfield in last night, but it seemed like he would have had a play on it. A futile play on it, but a play nonetheless.

i believe the general rule-of-thumb that Scorekeepers use for outfielders is that it is only an error on a flyball if it actually hits the glove. there may be exceptions to that, but that is usually how they gauge whether a guy should have caught it or not.

also, in cases of walk-offs like last night, it is very common for an outfielder to just give up on the ball knowing the game is over no matter what. in those cases, it is always ruled a basehit and almost always just a single.

As to the question of Navi's hit being an error because of the outfield being pulled in.... I would say it is the same in principal as Ortiz, Giambi, Thome or Pena hitting it to 3B when a shift is on. Those hits aren't ruled errors, it's just hitting where the fielder's aren't.