Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I present to you a senile old man. He claims that the results of 1 head-to-head matchup in football is more indicative of the strength of a team over the past 6 years than the results of 6 head-to-head matchups. Let us currently throw out all we know about statistical modeling and start anew, as we have been shown the light. Let us also tell all media outlets that their facts are invalid.

— Posted by KT Returns

Gee, sounds almost like you are talking about a State fan talking smack after winning one game against UNC in basketball to improve to 1-13 in the last six years.

— Posted by chapelthrillv2

You can't have it both ways, chuckles. Stop your crowing about 1-0 in football, or stop crowing about NCSU's less than basketball stellar streak that ended this year.

— Posted by KT Returns

We could talk about State losing 4 of 6 and being behind UNC in the ACC since it is current.

— Posted by DooksucksV3

Sure.

And, we can talk about how the Pack, slapped the snot out of the pansies just 10 days (or so) ago.

Yes, the record wasn't achieved by the current team or the current coaches, and it's not the total picture. As I've said before (even after the wusspeckers last won one), the only things that matter are the most recent game and the overall record.

— Posted by still heelman1973

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I present to you a senile old man. He claims that the results of 1 head-to-head matchup in football is more indicative of the strength of a team over the past 6 years than the results of 6 head-to-head matchups. Let us currently throw out all we know about statistical modeling and start anew, as we have been shown the light. Let us also tell all media outlets that their facts are invalid.

— Posted by KT Returns

Gee, sounds almost like you are talking about a State fan talking smack after winning one game against UNC in basketball to improve to 1-13 in the last six years.

— Posted by chapelthrillv2

You can't have it both ways, chuckles. Stop your crowing about 1-0 in football, or stop crowing about NCSU's less than basketball stellar streak that ended this year.

— Posted by KT Returns

We could talk about State losing 4 of 6 and being behind UNC in the ACC since it is current.

you'd think they'd LEARN to stop "thumin' their chests" over recruiting rankings, given the REALITY, that State has continually SLAPPED them around on the grid-iron the last decade or so, despite having a "lower ranking" in the recruiting rankings.

you'd think they'd LEARN to stop "thumin' their chests" over recruiting rankings, given the REALITY, that State has continually SLAPPED them around on the grid-iron the last decade or so, despite having a "lower ranking" in the recruiting rankings.

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I present to you a senile old man. He claims that the results of 1 head-to-head matchup in football is more indicative of the strength of a team over the past 6 years than the results of 6 head-to-head matchups. Let us currently throw out all we know about statistical modeling and start anew, as we have been shown the light. Let us also tell all media outlets that their facts are invalid.

— Posted by KT Returns

On the other hand, we have a young, ignorant punk who thinks a game 6 years ago is indicative of the strength of a current team. He's too stupid to realize that games from 6 years ago are about as meaningful in statistical modeling as a ping-pong match between the U.S. and South Korea.

Oh really? So you think the outcome of 6 games in a row is less indicative than 1 game?

— Posted by KT Returns

Yes, the record wasn't achieved by the current team or the current coaches, and it's not the total picture. As I've said before (even after the wusspeckers last won one), the only things that matter are the most recent game and the overall record.

— Posted by still heelman1973

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I present to you a senile old man. He claims that the results of 1 head-to-head matchup in football is more indicative of the strength of a team over the past 6 years than the results of 6 head-to-head matchups. Let us currently throw out all we know about statistical modeling and start anew, as we have been shown the light. Let us also tell all media outlets that their facts are invalid.

— Posted by KT Returns

On the other hand, we have a young, ignorant punk who thinks a game 6 years ago is indicative of the strength of a current team. He's too stupid to realize that games from 6 years ago are about as meaningful in statistical modeling as a ping-pong match between the U.S. and South Korea.

I see somebody's all torqued up. Why all the insults, gramps? Are you really that mad?

Realize that this strapping young lad merely presents the facts and lets you draw the conclusions. I never stated that the team 6 years ago is this year's team. I'm sorry you don't have the mental horsepower to understand this. I am comparing the teams OVER the past 6 years. If the results upset you so badly, I can see why you'd come out guns a blazin'. Maybe you should just go have a good cry and get back to us afterwards, gramps.

Yes, the record wasn't achieved by the current team or the current coaches, and it's not the total picture. As I've said before (even after the wusspeckers last won one), the only things that matter are the most recent game and the overall record.

— Posted by still heelman1973

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I present to you a senile old man. He claims that the results of 1 head-to-head matchup in football is more indicative of the strength of a team over the past 6 years than the results of 6 head-to-head matchups. Let us currently throw out all we know about statistical modeling and start anew, as we have been shown the light. Let us also tell all media outlets that their facts are invalid.

— Posted by KT Returns

On the other hand, we have a young, ignorant punk who thinks a game 6 years ago is indicative of the strength of a current team. He's too stupid to realize that games from 6 years ago are about as meaningful in statistical modeling as a ping-pong match between the U.S. and South Korea.

Oh really? So you think the outcome of 6 games in a row is less indicative than 1 game?

— Posted by KT Returns

Yes, the record wasn't achieved by the current team or the current coaches, and it's not the total picture. As I've said before (even after the wusspeckers last won one), the only things that matter are the most recent game and the overall record.

— Posted by still heelman1973

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I present to you a senile old man. He claims that the results of 1 head-to-head matchup in football is more indicative of the strength of a team over the past 6 years than the results of 6 head-to-head matchups. Let us currently throw out all we know about statistical modeling and start anew, as we have been shown the light. Let us also tell all media outlets that their facts are invalid.

— Posted by KT Returns

On the other hand, we have a young, ignorant punk who thinks a game 6 years ago is indicative of the strength of a current team. He's too stupid to realize that games from 6 years ago are about as meaningful in statistical modeling as a ping-pong match between the U.S. and South Korea.

Oh really? So you think the outcome of 6 games in a row is less indicative than 1 game?

— Posted by KT Returns

Yes, the record wasn't achieved by the current team or the current coaches, and it's not the total picture. As I've said before (even after the wusspeckers last won one), the only things that matter are the most recent game and the overall record.

— Posted by still heelman1973

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I present to you a senile old man. He claims that the results of 1 head-to-head matchup in football is more indicative of the strength of a team over the past 6 years than the results of 6 head-to-head matchups. Let us currently throw out all we know about statistical modeling and start anew, as we have been shown the light. Let us also tell all media outlets that their facts are invalid.

— Posted by KT Returns

On the other hand, we have a young, ignorant punk who thinks a game 6 years ago is indicative of the strength of a current team. He's too stupid to realize that games from 6 years ago are about as meaningful in statistical modeling as a ping-pong match between the U.S. and South Korea.

Oh really? So you think the outcome of 6 games in a row is less indicative than 1 game?

— Posted by KT Returns

Yes, the record wasn't achieved by the current team or the current coaches, and it's not the total picture. As I've said before (even after the wusspeckers last won one), the only things that matter are the most recent game and the overall record.

— Posted by still heelman1973

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I present to you a senile old man. He claims that the results of 1 head-to-head matchup in football is more indicative of the strength of a team over the past 6 years than the results of 6 head-to-head matchups. Let us currently throw out all we know about statistical modeling and start anew, as we have been shown the light. Let us also tell all media outlets that their facts are invalid.

— Posted by KT Returns

Gee, sounds almost like you are talking about a State fan talking smack after winning one game against UNC in basketball to improve to 1-13 in the last six years.

— Posted by chapelthrillv2

You can't have it both ways, chuckles. Stop your crowing about 1-0 in football, or stop crowing about NCSU's less than basketball stellar streak that ended this year.

Oh really? So you think the outcome of 6 games in a row is less indicative than 1 game?

— Posted by KT Returns

Yes, the record wasn't achieved by the current team or the current coaches, and it's not the total picture. As I've said before (even after the wusspeckers last won one), the only things that matter are the most recent game and the overall record.

— Posted by still heelman1973

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I present to you a senile old man. He claims that the results of 1 head-to-head matchup in football is more indicative of the strength of a team over the past 6 years than the results of 6 head-to-head matchups. Let us currently throw out all we know about statistical modeling and start anew, as we have been shown the light. Let us also tell all media outlets that their facts are invalid.

— Posted by KT Returns

Gee, sounds almost like you are talking about a State fan talking smack after winning one game against UNC in basketball to improve to 1-13 in the last six years.

Are you seriously that juvenile? Your coach has only played 1 game against us. Ours hasn't even coached a game for NCSU. Your argument is invalid.

— Posted by KT Returns

It's just a valid as your dumba** 5-1 argument.

— Posted by still heelman1973

Oh really? So you think the outcome of 6 games in a row is less indicative than 1 game?

— Posted by KT Returns

Yes, the record wasn't achieved by the current team or the current coaches, and it's not the total picture. As I've said before (even after the wusspeckers last won one), the only things that matter are the most recent game and the overall record.

— Posted by still heelman1973

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I present to you a senile old man. He claims that the results of 1 head-to-head matchup in football is more indicative of the strength of a team over the past 6 years than the results of 6 head-to-head matchups. Let us currently throw out all we know about statistical modeling and start anew, as we have been shown the light. Let us also tell all media outlets that their facts are invalid.

More importantly, our head coach has never lost to NC State, and yours had never defeated Carolina. It is almost like we're talking about basketball!

— Posted by chapelthrillv2

Are you seriously that juvenile? Your coach has only played 1 game against us. Ours hasn't even coached a game for NCSU. Your argument is invalid.

— Posted by KT Returns

It's just a valid as your dumba** 5-1 argument.

— Posted by still heelman1973

Oh really? So you think the outcome of 6 games in a row is less indicative than 1 game?

— Posted by KT Returns

Yes, the record wasn't achieved by the current team or the current coaches, and it's not the total picture. As I've said before (even after the wusspeckers last won one), the only things that matter are the most recent game and the overall record.