It's no surprise the the Times, once again, is advocating a regional approach, which truly is in the best interests of its readership. But it neglects the fact that Mayor Bill Foster and St. Pete's council is trying to act in the best interests of its constituency.

One particular excerpt assumes the Rays and MLB have nothing but good intentions:

What sounds so reasonable to the county commissions in Pinellas and
Hillsborough and many business leaders on both sides of the bay morphs
into a suspicious plot to the mayor and too many council members.To be fair, the council's indecision is colored by the poor advice from Foster and City Attorney John Wolfe...Foster is looking out for his re-election
campaign, and Wolfe has too much pride of authorship tied up in the
city's long-term lease with the Rays.

The Times editorial board thinks it knows legal leverage better than Foster and Wolfe, who are both lawyers. But how does it think Foster's stubbornness makes for good politics?

You know, maybe the newspaper happens to be right on this one; maybe not. But it seems to have forgotten how many other major league baseball teams used St. Pete as leverage to get new stadium subsidies elsewhere.