Comments on: FreeNAS ready for the next step !http://www.freenas.org/whats-new/2009/12/freenas-ready-for-the-next-step.html
Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:09:09 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.3By: Tommyhttp://www.freenas.org/whats-new/2009/12/freenas-ready-for-the-next-step.html#comment-220
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:09:49 +0000http://www.freenas.org/whats-new/2009/12/freenas-ready-for-the-next-step.html#comment-220I would just like to say a big thank you to all developers/beta testers/users of this project.
]]>By: Jedhttp://www.freenas.org/whats-new/2009/12/freenas-ready-for-the-next-step.html#comment-218
Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:10:20 +0000http://www.freenas.org/whats-new/2009/12/freenas-ready-for-the-next-step.html#comment-218There’s no reason that the switch to Debian means the elimination of ZFS. Net release of Debian should have the FreeBSD kernel.

The website corenas.org is not related to anyone on the FreeNAS or OpenMediaVault team (the owner of corenas.org had registered the domain name some days before Volker did it).

“Why not use the work PFSense has done in forking the monowall gui?”

It’s an interesting idea (I’m testing it), but I will let ixSystems to decide.

]]>By: mmaxxhttp://www.freenas.org/whats-new/2009/12/freenas-ready-for-the-next-step.html#comment-216
Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:29:41 +0000http://www.freenas.org/whats-new/2009/12/freenas-ready-for-the-next-step.html#comment-216Why not use the work PFSense has done in forking the monowall gui?They have packages etc and other things going on FreeBSD.
]]>By: john smithhttp://www.freenas.org/whats-new/2009/12/freenas-ready-for-the-next-step.html#comment-215
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 22:01:31 +0000http://www.freenas.org/whats-new/2009/12/freenas-ready-for-the-next-step.html#comment-215Just noticed that the CoreNAS team have gone live with their corenas.org website