Friday, September 13, 2013

Hudson Hawk (1991)

Sometimes we like a movie even though everybody else thinks its
crap, and Hudson Hawk is one of those movies for me. Lambasted by critics when
it was first released, Hudson Hawk was deemed “unspeakably awful” by Rolling
Stone magazine and “implausible” by AMC Film Critic; to that I say “where’s
your sense of humor people?” Yeah it’s silly and over the top, but when was
that a sin? Last time I checked there’s room in the universe for films like this;
in fact, sometimes it’s exactly what I need to watch. Bruce Willis was part of
the group of writers that were responsible for the film; that’s right my
friends, Bruce Willis partially concocted the story for this film. The film was such a horrendous flop that Willis never dabbled in the script department of any film ever again. The thing is
that I perfectly get what Bruce Willis wanted to convey with Hudson Hawk, I get
the vibe, I get the style of comedy, I get the tone of the flick, what I don’t
get is why other people don’t find it as entertaining as I do! Really this
movie is tons of fun!

Eddie Hawkins a.k.a. ‘Hudson Hawk’ is a master thief who has
just gotten out of jail. He’s done his time, it’s over, he’s out. Problem is
that he is such a great burglar that the minute he steps out of jail, he is
immediately offered an irresistible job to steal a famous work of art from an
auction house. The piece? None other than Davinci’s ‘Sforza’. And so the tale unfolds,
soon Hudson Hawk learns that the ones who want to steal these famous works of
art are the head honchos of a corporation known as Mayflower Industries; a corporation
run by two genuine whackos know as Darwin and Minerva Mayflower, a husband and
wife duo who want nothing more than to destroy the very economical foundations
of society! So once Hudson Hawk realizes what the deal is, of course, he has to
stop these two power hungry megalomaniacs.

So Hudson Hawk is the kind of movie that doesn’t really care
much for logic and reason, it simply wants to be fast paced, tell a couple of jokes
and one liners along the way, maybe put a smile on your face and finally
entertain ya. This isn’t Shakespeare and it never tries to be; this is a heist
movie tinted with a little bit of adventure and sprayed with a little bit of gangster film shenanigans
for good measure. You see, Hudson Hawks best buddy is a guy called Tommy Five
Tone, the owner of a bar where gangster go to talk shop, eat and drink. Cool part
is that Tommy Five Tone is played by Danny Aiello and what says “gangster movie”
more than Danny Aiello right? There’s a group of actors out there who always
end up in gangster movies because they have that Italian gangster face and
Aiello is one of them. So anyways, Tommy
Five Tone runs this bar, but on the side he sometimes organizes a heist or two,
and Hudson Hawk is his right hand man. Here’s an element of the film that lets
you know how lighthearted it is: Tommy and Hawk pull off their heists while
singing Bing Crosby and Paul Anka songs! They actually time their heists to
however long the song lasts. The chemistry between these two characters is one
of the elements that keeps the movie entertaining, the one liners, the jokes,
the funny back and forth. Listen carefully; the subtle word play is hilarious
on this one. I mean, one of the crime families in the film is named The Mario
Brothers!

Calling this movie implausible, as a critic called it is
simply stupid, because plausibility is not something I look for in a movie like
Hudson Hawk, in fact, in this kind of tongue in cheek movie, plausibility is the
last thing on the list. On this kind of movie you get the complete opposite,
which is why I enjoy the elements in Hudson Hawks that border on fantasy, I
like the over the topness. I like seeing Willis pulling off a heist while
singing ‘Swinging on a Star’. I like how the fights and the action where pulled
off in a cartoonish fashion, it at times feels like you’re watching a Three
Stooges short. And speaking of over the top, out of all the performances,
Sara Bernhard’s ‘Minerva Mayflower’ stands out as the most over the top
character of all! Bernhard has been a comedian for many years, even performing
to sell out crowds in Broadway. I remember her the most from her role in Martin
Scorsese’s The King of Comedy (1983), a
film in which she played opposite Robert DeNiro and Jerry Lewis. On this one
she is loud, intimidating and larger than life. It is obvious she relished
playing the lead villain. As a suggestion, if you feel like checking out the special
features, check out this really funny featurette in which Bernhard explains how
she loved playing Minerva, its hilarious!

The film was directed
by Michael Lehmann, the same director behind such films as Heathers (1988) Airheads
(1994) and Meet The Applegates (1990), here he does a good job, in my opinion
the film has slick production values, they even shot some scenes in Rome which
was pretty cool. Unfortunately for Lehman, Hudson Hawk was shot down from the
skies, it was a bomb, probably because it was a very misunderstood film. It was
marketed as an action adventure film, and so people were probably expecting
something along the lines of what they’d seen Willis successfully pull off in
Die Hard (1988) and Die Hard 2 (1990) and so that probably caught people off
guard. They weren’t expecting a goofy, cartoonish action/comedy, heist movie, they
wanted more of John McClain! Instead they got John McClain via The Three Stooges, not a bad combo if you forget all about expectations!

Just how cartoonish was this film you ask? Well,
during some of the fights you’ll hear cartoon sounds, just like you’d hear in
those old Warner Bros. cartoons that’s how cartoonish this movie was! The fights?
Very slapstick in nature, usually, the main characters will be in peril, but
everything turns out good in the end, it’s that kind of movie. I say that if
they had marketed the film for what it was, it wouldn’t have disappointed audiences
and it might have had a chance. When released in theaters, it was marketed with
the tagline “Catch the Adventure, Catch the Excitement, Catch the Hawk!” which
suggests it’s a full blown action flick. Yet, after the film tanked, they switched
the word “Adventure” for “Laughter” for the films Home Video release, but by
then it was too late. My take on it is that audiences don’t like to be lied too.
I’ve seen this happen with many other movies, the first one that comes to mind
is Nicholas Cage’s Vampires Kiss (1989) which was marketed as a comedy, but was
actually a dark, weird film. Lesson for Hollywood: don’t lie to your audience
just to get their butts in the theater, your film will suffer for it. Now here’s
The Film Connoisseur telling it like it is, now you know what kind of movie
Hudson Hawk is, go check it out, you’ll more than likely have a good time.

I think your rating is right on with this one. It was an entertaining bit of comedy/adventure. Not as successful as something like "Romancing the Stone", but along those lines. I was one of the 10 people that actually saw this in the theater.

I was working at a video store when this came out on VHS, and I remember trying to convince folks to watch it. Tough sell, word of mouth really killed it. Even having the movie on in the store wasn't enough. People would ask what it was, and the minute you said "Hudson Hawk" they lost interest. Didn't even give it a try.

Yeah, bad word of mouth can be a real killer for a movie, it forms this negative idea in peoples minds immediately. People don't even consider the film and immediately dismiss it without even giving it a chance. I personally like to make up my own mind about things! I mean, not everybody likes the same things....someone might have hated it, doesnt mean you will you know what I mean?

Ha! I have to admit, I've never seen this just because of all the negative reception. I imagine you have to be in the right mood though if you're going to tackle this on for the first time. You've definitely inspired me to finally check this one out. But I think I'll wait for the right time when I'm in the right mood.