Air Max One Atmos Elephant

time I'm talking aboutAnd again, I am saying that time is virtually non existent. It is a red herring, used to try to pretend that "those weird people who actually learn stuff" aren't getting anything done. People are not talking about haskell and clojure instead of working. That is the entire point.

Domenic_S 561 days ago link

Domenic_S 561 days ago link

Honestly, I wish I could believe that. But I really don't see how I am reading anything into it. The implication that people who talk about programming languages that he doesn't want to learn about are not "shipping product" is quite clear. I don't see any way to interpret that sentiment other than as anti intellectualism. .

guiomie 561 days ago link

in fallacious quips like that. People discussing haskell and clojure are not magically prevented from writing code as a result of their intellectual curiosity and desire to explore better tools and methods. The implication that people who are smart and use quality tools never accomplish anything or do any work is quite insidious, as newcomers start taking pride in ignorance because they are "shipping product" while falsely believing those other people aren't. It becomes used as a way to dismiss opportunities to learn because they've equated learning and being educated with not accomplishing anything.

That's a Air Max One Atmos Elephant situation particular to you and your team, unless you're saying everyone would do a better job in scala?

there are infinite productive hours in your day you have to choose your stack and go for itBut the people advocating haskell and clojure have done that. And they feel that their choice worked out so well that they should be nice enough to tell others how good it is. That is not the case, and it is a rather odd thing to believe. This argument actually works against "just shipping in PHP". The less time you have Air Max 1 Red On Feet

If one bothers to learn about tools and why they are useful, they can think a little bit deeper and understand why some intellectual argument do result in software that ships. We write Scala at my company because we've found that with the right developers who seek to understand type systems and fp we can ship fast as fuck. I'm dozens of times faster working in Scala than I ever would be in php. And I could guarantee that one of the two wouldn't be "dozens of times faster" than the other.

papsosouid 561 days ago link

﻿argue about whether Haskell or Clojure is better while somebody else ship

anyone engaged in "intellectual wanking" instead of "shipping product" is fallacious. I've advocated haskell here before. Obviously I wasn't writing code while doing so, but would I have been writing code were I not advocating haskell? No, I would have been talking about something else, still not coding. php; X vs Y).

I guess strictly speaking it's a false dilemma to say you're either arguing endlessly or shipping, but I don't really think that was the spirit of the quote. We all of us owe our careers to the people who came before us asking, 'what if we could do it this way?'. But, you have to draw the line between intellectual wanking and thoughtlessness. It's a surprisingly hard line to draw more for some than for others.

to spend dealing with bugs that would have been prevented in another language, the more time you'll have for productivity. you have to draw the line between intellectual wanking and thoughtlessnessI believe the idea that there is Nike Air Max 1 Print