Share

Trending Discussions

Iran Gets Creative Over Energy Payments from Turkey and Pakistan

First begun in 1979 following the seizure of the U.S. embassy in Tehran, Iran is now subject to three differing sets of sanctions – the U.S., the European Union and the United Nations. Implemented over fears of covert nuclear weapons development hidden in Iran’s civilian nuclear energy program, the tightening sanctions have forced both Iran and its energy importers to get creative about financing.

Iran currently provides 44 percent of Turkey’s oil imports and Turkey is Iran’s biggest natural gas customer. The sanctions legislation has hit hard Turkey’s abilities to pay for its Iranian natural gas imports, so Tehran and Ankara came up with a circuitous plan to allow Turkey to pay in gold bullion.

Because U.S. sanctions prevent Turkey from paying in dollars or Euros, Turkey has been paying Iran for its imports in Turkish Liras. Iranians then use those liras, held in Halkbank accounts, to buy gold in Turkey, and couriers carry the bullion to Dubai, where it can be sold for foreign currency or shipped to Iran. According to Turkish Statistics Institute (TÜ?K) data, in February Turkey exported almost $120 million in gold to Iran and in March Turkish gold exports to Iran soared to almost $381 million.

Or rather, did, because on 1 July tough new U.S. sanctions targeting gold transactions came into effect. Two months ago Treasury Undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence David Cohen told a Congressional hearing “We have been clear that that July 1st date is a real date and that after July 1st, any sale of gold to Iran is something that we will pursue vigorously,” but how this will impact U.S.-Turkish relations remains to be seen, given Turkey’s value to the Obama administration as a partner on a host of issues.

Another strategic U.S. ally has also developed an interesting means to sidestep U.S. sanctions. A barter deal between Iran and Pakistan, with Islamabad supplying 100,000 tons of wheat against its outstanding bill for electricity imports was first proposed in mid-February but was delayed by preparations for Pakistan’s 11 May election. Commerce Ministry spokesman Mohammad Ashraf said following the election, “The wheat is being given to Iran against the outstanding payment of $53 million for electricity supplied to Pakistani border areas from the Iranian grid. The interim cabinet has approved the decision and exports will be initiated as early as possible.” The grain is to come from government stocks. In earlier negotiations, in August 2012 Pakistan agreed a price of $300 per ton.

Pakistan is battling chronic electricity shortages, which is inflaming public anger and stifling industrial output, as power outages can last eight to 10 hours a day in cities, with much more frequent cuts in rural areas. “Pakistan is an energy-starved country facing severe power cuts that are badly hampering industrial output,” Ashraf said. “Connecting far-flung areas to Pakistan’s grid is a costly affair.” Electricity from Iran costs Pakistan around $3 million a month and is supplied to towns near the Iranian border, including the Arabian Sea port of Gwadar. Pakistan now owes Iran $53 million for the electricity imports but its cash-strapped state and private power companies have no means to pay, as the companies’ infrastructures are outdated and the utilities are inefficient.

Pakistan’s electricity is generated, transmitted, distributed, and sold by two vertically integrated public sector utilities, Water and Power Development Authority, responsible for all of Pakistan except Karachi, and the Karachi Electric Supply Corp, along with roughly 20 independent power producers. None have developed substantive solutions to the country’s ongoing power crisis.

Western sanctions do not as yet target food shipments to Iran, but the fiscal measures have frozen Iranian companies out of much of the global banking system, hindering payments for imports, on which Iran relies for much of its food.

Iran has an additional reason to be interested in Pakistani wheat - Uganda-99 wheat rust, a virulent stem rust race first detected in Uganda in 1999. Ug-99 can kill wheat plants and small grain cereals, but more usually reduces foliage, root growth, and grain yields. Windborne, in 2006 Ug99 had spread from Uganda northwards into Sudan and blew across the Red Sea into Yemen and by 2007 it had reached Iran following regional winds.

According to the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, “In Iran, very early reports of yellow rust infections occurred in January 2013 in the south-west of Iran (South Khuzestan). Yellow rust developed rapidly and spread on Cultivars Chamran and Veery/Nacazori, causing epidemics in farmers fields. Over 100,000 ha are reported to have been sprayed with fungicide in the southwest and west of Iran. Incidence of Yellow rust on susceptible wheat cultivars in other parts of Iran has also been reported from west (Ilam and Kermanshah), Caspian Region (Gorgan), south-east (Kerman and Jiroft), south of Fars province (Mamasani) and north west (Ardabil.)”

So, will Washington, which needs Turkish and Pakistani assistance in coping with crises from Syria to Afghanistan, lower the boom on their creative approaches to resolve their energy shortages? Will sanctions be relaxed, or tightened to include food?

You, perhaps, inadvertantly forgot to mention India and her stake in Iran oilfields and creative ways they are employing to keep Iranian oil fueling Indian economy.

Steve on July 23 2013 said:

No it didn't begin in 1979, it all began in 1953 after US/UK toppling of Iran's democratically elected government for crime of nationalizing their own oil.

Philip Branton on July 23 2013 said:

We wonder how many of Admiral Dempsey's troops understand the information in this article....??

George on July 23 2013 said:

So, you want the U.S. to lower the boom on Turkey and Pakistan? For what? Do you have the same disease as Lindsey Graham? What horrible sin has Iran committed? Do you have evidence that Iran is building nuclear bombs? Do you mind presenting your evidence since 16 U.S. intelligence agencies and the IAEA still don't have any evidence.

The audacity and hypocrisy of Americans who complain about Iran's nuclear program is unbelievable. The U.S. has thousands of nukes and is the only country that has actually used nuclear bombs. Yet, it is supposedly paranoid that Iran may someday decide to build nukes which are totally useless in today's world.

The IAEA has not found evidence that Iran is using is nuclear reactor for military purposes. If Iran wanted to build a bomb, it had made it years ago. It seems USA looking for a government change in Iran.

Joe Zrnchik on July 24 2013 said:

I disagree. Given the US's nuclear policy and its doctrine of maintaining the right to have first-strike capability against non-nuclear powers in order to force a cessation of hostilities on terms favorable to the US, and given Israel's and the US' s constant threats to attack a peaceful nuclear program that is in compliance with the IAEA and international law, Iran may not want a bomb, but it needs one. If the US or Israel attacks an Iranian facility and releases radiation into the atmosphere it will be a great crime against humanity. And, hopefully Iran would repay the favor by hitting Israeli nuke sites.

Leave a comment

First Name

Last Name

Email

That email address is already in the database. Please login to your account to post your comment, or enter a different email address to continue with your comment & account creation.

Captcha

Comment

Please understand that, by submitting this form, you will be creating a free OilPrice.com account, and therefore agree to abide by our Terms of Use. Your details will be stored in our database and shared with our third party mailing list provider. You will be sent an email containing a link that will ask you to generate a new password - please follow the link to complete your OilPrice account activation.

We will save the information entered above in our website. Your comment will then await moderation from one of our team. If approved, your data will then be publically viewable on this article. Please confirm you understand and are happy with this and our privacy policy by ticking this box. You can withdraw your consent, or ask us to give you a copy of the information we have stored, at any time by contacting us.