I said once most peoples main reasons for voting for Obama is because hes black, not his policy, and some one called me a racist. It is an easy word to use and a suppose strong word in which I am suppose to back into a corner and try and defend myself, because being called a racist is right up there with committing rape or murder.

But instead, I told him he was a dumb ass and can't argue politics to save his ass.

Racism is discrimination based on race. Patriotism is love of one's country. Yes, I know racism just implies that variable traits can be someone taxonomically classified and yes, it can, but language evolves today it means differing treatment of individuals based on their race and whatever inferences are drawn from them.

Regarding race(whites vs 3rd world people)let's break it down like this:
If you remove the white race from our modern world/civilization, would negros still be driving around in SUV's, talking on cell phones and making millions of $ playing sports and doing their rap?
And what would the indians of Latin America be doing?
They of course be doing what they had been doing for thousands of years - the same thing over and over, with no progress at all.

Regarding race(whites vs 3rd world people)let's break it down like this:
If you remove the white race from our modern world/civilization, would negros still be driving around in SUV's, talking on cell phones and making millions of $ playing sports and doing their rap?
And what would the indians of Latin America be doing?
They of course be doing what they had been doing for thousands of years - the same thing over and over, with no progress at all.

Has there never been in the history of the white race of a span of 1000 years without much progress? Technology & science perpetuates itself because they are the products of a radical method of thought. A culture that emphasizes scientific culture, like in the science classes of today's developed societies, learn to have a framework and stable institutions set up. I don't understand how white supremacists can take a 200 year snapshot of the human timeline and use it in their overwhelming argument for racial capacity to create.

And speaking of multiculturalism as something that is FORCED upon white Americans. Think of America's system of checks and balances, why was a mode of government, namely American democracy, ENGINEERED (or one could say, FORCED upon the American people) to DIVERT their NATURAL tendency towards corruption and bias in government? I am not advocating multiculturalism but what is wrong with one form of "forced" social reform (democracy) and another (multiculturalism)?

I said once most peoples main reasons for voting for Obama is because hes black, not his policy, and some one called me a racist. It is an easy word to use and a suppose strong word in which I am suppose to back into a corner and try and defend myself, because being called a racist is right up there with committing rape or murder.

But instead, I told him he was a dumb ass and can't argue politics to save his ass.

A big reason for why I'm voting for Obama is because he's black. I'm not black, but it's a reason. Why should I be ashamed? We voted for Kennedy cause he was good looking, and GWB cause he was funny... see how they both ended up on the spectrum of good and bad presidents. You expect America to suddenly become super politically conscious voters overnight because one candidate is black?

We single out race as the primary factor based on our observations. I do not have to look beyond my own region, nor do I have to conduct extensive genetic and statistical research to arrive at a common sense cause and effect relationship between race and the quality of a given region.

You lack intellectual vigor obviously. You are secure with the conclusion you have arrived at. You know deep down in your heart that research on race, nature vs. nurture debates, genetics and its expression would provide a clearer picture on the race issue, but no. You don't NEED it. You've already made up your mind. You may or may not be smart, but you lack vigor.

Quote:

Therefore "oh, yes, our genes say so." is likely accurate.

Iraq likely has WMDs.

Quote:

Antis can blame a poor environment and oppression instead of race, but this begs the question "What is responsible for the differences in environment and for the oppression?. I feel it comes down to genes.

"Any" amount of integration would not necessarily lead to the inevirable extinction of Whites, but but we have now is far, far, more than just merely "any".

You kinda negate the finer points of the philosophies of reason that made your race so great, IMHO.

Has there never been in the history of the white race of a span of 1000 years without much progress? Technology & science perpetuates itself because they are the products of a radical method of thought. A culture that emphasizes scientific culture, like in the science classes of today's developed societies, learn to have a framework and stable institutions set up. I don't understand how white supremacists can take a 200 year snapshot of the human timeline and use it in their overwhelming argument for racial capacity to create.

The precursors of modern science go back to the Greeks at least. Eucidean geometry was a more or less self-contained logical body of thought long before the modern era. Aristotlean thought, had explanations about the natural world that were from ordinary mundane observation and did not involve fanciful gods and godesses. The same cannot be said of such things as astrology.

Galileo died in 1642, the same year Isaac Newton was born. That's longer than 200 years ago.

Quote:

And speaking of multiculturalism as something that is FORCED upon white Americans. Think of America's system of checks and balances, why was a mode of government, namely American democracy, ENGINEERED (or one could say, FORCED upon the American people) to DIVERT their NATURAL tendency towards corruption and bias in government? I am not advocating multiculturalism but what is wrong with one form of "forced" social reform (democracy) and another (multiculturalism)?

Democracy was intended to keep political differences from erupting into open warfare; multiculturalism is a part of cultural marxism, and is intended for the destruction of the white race, as well as any form of nationalism.

You lack intellectual vigor obviously. You are secure with the conclusion you have arrived at. You know deep down in your heart that research on race, nature vs. nurture debates, genetics and its expression would provide a clearer picture on the race issue, but no. You don't NEED it. You've already made up your mind. You may or may not be smart, but you lack vigor.

The point is, the term "racism" has it's roots in communism. It's a politically and socially abused word to inaccurately describe ethnocentrism, which most people are. Again if you had read my second-to-last rebuttal to you, you'd understand the origins of the term racism and why it was created. Hirschfeld was the first to bring the term to the English language in the mid-thirties.
Your dictionary definition of the term racism has nothing to do with the origins of the term. To fully understand something, you must understand it's complete history.

Ok, racism is ethnocentrism, not my definition. LOL?
Ethnocentrism becomes racism (in my supplied definition, and frankly the only one I can find) when applied to an already multicultural society. In other words, same difference.

Quote:

Exactly, and if you understood communism, you'd know why the term was created and used. It was created and used to slander and defame those who held ethnocentric and pro-nationalist views, as both posed a threat to the communist agenda. Tell me, when has the word racism ever been used for anything but slander and defamation?

So "understanding Communism" equalds a tool for slander and defamation? I'm going to write a book called Understand Communism: A tool for slander and defamation. LOL I understand most political movements say bad things about the other side, it's just what they do. Malaria came from "mal" "air" which means literally bad air. So malaria means bad air right? LOL, meanings change buddy.

Quote:

If you're going to call us "racists," then understanding the history of the word is vitally important. As I said above, the term is politically and socially abused to describe ethnocentrism -- which most people are. As I also said, it's a word used to slander and defame people who hold ethnocentric and pro-nationalist views. It's a buzzword. Get it?Leon Trotsky -- a Jew. Incidentally, Hirschfield was also a Jew.
"Racism" is a communist social construct. The point for creating the word, as I've repeatedly explained, was and is to slander and defame anybody who holds ethnocentric and pro-national views, both of which were a threat to the objectives of communism, and more recently -- multiculturalism.

You don't like the name racist.. Boo hoo. Rapists don't like the name, but we call them it. Child molestors would rather be called lovers of little kids, but no, they're child molestors. What's your point?

The precursors of modern science go back to the Greeks at least. Eucidean geometry was a more or less self-contained logical body of thought long before the modern era. Aristotlean thought, had explanations about the natural world that were from ordinary mundane observation and did not involve fanciful gods and godesses. The same cannot be said of such things as astrology.

Galileo died in 1642, the same year Isaac Newton was born. That's longer than 200 years ago.

No. MODERN science does not go back to the Greeks... If whites are naturally predisposed to reason and all that, explain the popularity of people like Anton Mesmer even as the scientific revolution was getting quite underway? Why has even the beginnings of modern science been tainted with notions of elan vital, or vitalism. What about the ideas of Lamarck? Why was it so difficult to expel notions of mysticismthat involved fanciful gods? Even if it did, it does not mean other civilizations did not have the knowledge they had and in fact had much that they didn't so it cannot be used as NET progress at that point of time. More significantly, modern science goes back to the days of Newton, yes, but how does Newton equate to some innate capacity of white people? I havent seen any white person that comes close to his level of genius.

What serves science well is smart people who apply their intellect using a certain framework of viewing the world. That framework is not a product of their genes.

Quote:

Democracy was intended to keep political differences from erupting into open warfare; multiculturalism is a part of cultural marxism, and is intended for the destruction of the white race, as well as any form of nationalism.

So the word racism's purpose was to defame pro-nationalists. And multiculturalism is INTENDED to destroy the white race. OK... Then can I say democracy was created to let dumb people vote? See what I'm getting at?