Main menu

Post navigation

Scores of 3 (moderate) and 4 (strong) were considered to be “high

Scores of 3 (moderate) and 4 (strong) were considered to be “high immunoexpression”. IDH1 immunostaining was scored in the nuclei and/or cytoplasm, and MGMT were scored

in the nuclei of tumor cells as negative (no stain or limited to <10% positive tumor cells) or positive (≥10% tumor cells). The immunohistochemistry scores determined for FasL, Fas, cleaved caspase-8, and cleaved caspase-3 expression of the TMAs and control nervous tissues were compared using the Mann–Whitney test, and correlations in each group were determined using the nonparametric Spearman test. To construct the survival curves illustrating overall survival between the patient groups with “low expression” (scores 0, 1, and 2) vs. “high expression” (scores 3 and 4) immunohistochemistry scores for FasL, Fas, Alpelisib price cleaved casp-8 and -3, IDH1, and MGMT, we used the Kaplan–Meier method. To compare the overall survival curves, we used the log-rank test. To simultaneously Dabrafenib molecular weight analyze the prognostic effect of the various factors (treatment, age, gender, tumor size, tumor location, and the immunoexpression scores of low and high expression of FasL, Fas, cleaved caspase-8, and -3) on the time of survival, we used a multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional-hazards regression

model using a covariate of primary interest and adjustment covariates. All statistical analyses and graph constructions were performed using GraphPad Prism version 4.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), and SAS version 9 for Windows (SAS Institute, Inc.; Cary, NC, USA). The level of significance

was 0.05 (P Neratinib ic50 was 0.8:1 (Table 1). There were no differences in the survival among the age groups (P = 0.78) or the genders (P = 0.24) as determined by both univariate and multivariate analyses ( Table 3). The sizes of the tumors at the first diagnosis were available for 55 patients (Table 1). Most of them (70.9%) were supratentorial tumors >5 cm that had invaded or compressed the ventricular system (60%) or had crossed over the middle line or invaded infratentorial structures (10.9%). The other 21.8% of the supratentorial tumors for which tumor locations had been recorded in the medical records were more circumscribed, measuring >5 cm (12.7%) or ≤5 cm (9.1%). The frontal lobe alone or in association with the involvement of other supratentorial structures was the most affected (49 out of 94 cases (52.1%)). In 4 patients, the tumor was located in infratentorial structures, with the cerebellum, posterior fossa, and pons/medulla serving as the primary sites.