Coffeehouse Thread

Forum Read Only

what the advantage of .net is, the MS call it that "easy to use". the old chinese(in about B.C) told us , "To Every one is easy, means NO ONE is".
let us look at the history, why a Hard to use framework that the MFC will be popular(better than VB and BCL Much ), because that the complied code(local machine code) is fast in that time.

.NET is a huge success. It IS easy to use, and the performance of .NET has been more than acceptable. The time we save devloping our solutions, provides us with more than enough leftover money to purchase additional hardware if reaquired.
This is the advantage of using .net.

Further to this, take a look at the success of all interpreted languages, including scripting. There are huge amounts of projects, that utilis this, and the performance seems to be more than adaquite for the needs.

Sure, you may well be able to develop something that runs quicker with c/c++, but at some stage you need to be able to deliver applications in a reasonable time frame.

.NET is a huge success. It IS easy to use, and the performance of .NET has been more than acceptable. The time we save devloping our solutions, provides us with more than enough leftover money to purchase additional hardware if reaquired.
This is the advantage of using .net.

Further to this, take a look at the success of all interpreted languages, including scripting. There are huge amounts of projects, that utilis this, and the performance seems to be more than adaquite for the needs.

Sure, you may well be able to develop something that runs quicker with c/c++, but at some stage you need to be able to deliver applications in a reasonable time frame.

That's just my 2c

there are no competitors(no choice), so you call .Net is a 'huge' success ,be acceptable.
you must remember,the script is a script,not a programming language, it's not for a programmer as we are professional.

wow... Nothing in that post made even the slightest amount of sense. Are you taking any kind of medication?

I had to read it three times, but she does make sense. And give the girl credit, she is working in a language that is not only a second but uses an entirely different script. I am in no position to judge the merits of her argument, but I think she is saying
that the traditional MFC and compiled code is better, even with it's difficult implementation, than .Net and the CLR. I don't personally agree with that, but the only thing that has allowed us to evolve to this point is the hardware available. And that might
just pehaps be an issue for some.

wow... Nothing in that post made even the slightest amount of sense. Are you taking any kind of medication?

Now be nice - if you can't write Chinese then don't criticize leighsword's English

For example, in "so,a Garbage framework + a good compiler >>(larger better) a perfect framework + a bad compiler(JIT, an awful idea)" it seems clear that leighsword is arguing for adding garbage collection to existing languages, instead of trying for academic
perfection in a language and framework that is JIT-compiled.

For example, in "so,a Garbage framework + a good compiler >>(larger better) a perfect framework + a bad compiler(JIT, an awful idea)" it seems clear that leighsword is arguing for adding garbage collection to existing languages, instead of trying for academic
perfection in a language and framework that is JIT-compiled.

...the script is a script,not a programming language, it's not for a programmer as we are professional.

Oh darling, I am just a simple sysadmin, but don't get me started on scripting, WSH and all, it is a language in it's on right. Perhaps simple, perhaps ADSI is just a console app, but it does have as much versatility as PERL.

Shell scripting is something I have a bit of experience with, ksh and bash, but I am far away from having any expertise. Perl is somthing I am learning, as it just appeals to my desire for a swiss knife in my job needs.
But you are right, shell scripts are a very powerful tool in their own right, and I only wish WSH would incorporate some of the simplicity and logic of the Unix world.

Umhh, the Interix packages are primarily designed for Unix on Windows (SFU? or are we talking about something else?). That is not my environment. Although I have used it. In any case the Korn shell for linux is the pdksh packages. They install as any
other. I know you are running Mandrake so it will be different.

Yep, we've gotten way off topic now. Sorry Leighsgood. You kinda got me scared with the santy thing, I will have to check my Linux boxes tomorrow. 'Course I have kept Ipchains up on both of them, and they are in a DMZ protected by a firewall that runs
a modified SCO kernel that will remain un-named. (But their latest version is actually going to a Linux Kernel, also very much modified)

I am a bit confused. Other than port 80 or 443 what else would you need? And an exploit runs not against a port but against the service behind it. I know earlier you mentioned SSH, now that has had some issues.

Leigh,
Keep on posting doll. You are light years ahead of me in any case. Sorry about getting this thread all way off topic (what was the topic?) What kind of hardware are you running on? Pentium III's or better? Just curiousity.

Leigh,
Keep on posting doll. You are light years ahead of me in any case. Sorry about getting this thread all way off topic (what was the topic?) What kind of hardware are you running on? Pentium III's or better? Just curiousity.

haha, at least N light years.(1 USD >= 8 RMB)
everyone can able to say what they need to say.
our customer's computer is various,but one thing can be sure, that is can able to running Win98.