]]>By: inquisitiveEngineerhttp://macdailynews.com/2012/12/24/ipad-5th-gen-due-march-2013-apple-preps-ipad-mini-with-retina-display-says-source/comment-page-2/#comment-1128289
Tue, 25 Dec 2012 01:19:47 +0000http://macdailynews.com/?p=96804#comment-1128289Oh, don’t get me wrong, I certainly wouldn’t mind anything lighter or thinner, as long as it holds up durability-wise. (I’m planning on getting a 27-in. iMac myself, soon.) I was just poking fun at their ill-informed dimensions. I think you’ll agree that anyone saying that Apple’s next iPad will measure less than 1 in. x 1 in. needs to check their math.
]]>By: Janinehttp://macdailynews.com/2012/12/24/ipad-5th-gen-due-march-2013-apple-preps-ipad-mini-with-retina-display-says-source/comment-page-1/#comment-1128287
Tue, 25 Dec 2012 01:12:25 +0000http://macdailynews.com/?p=96804#comment-1128287Seriously! Metric system is not that difficult…
]]>By: Weekendhttp://macdailynews.com/2012/12/24/ipad-5th-gen-due-march-2013-apple-preps-ipad-mini-with-retina-display-says-source/comment-page-2/#comment-1128272
Mon, 24 Dec 2012 22:56:20 +0000http://macdailynews.com/?p=96804#comment-1128272Lighter and thinner is great sometimes. I don’t need my iPhone (4S) to be thinner. Actually my 2G iPhone was the most comfortable to hold. With or without a case. My 4th gen iPod is too thin. My iPad (3rd gen) is ok but thinner might be nice. I purchased a 27 inch iMac as a present and it was delivered Monday. I’m sitting in front of it now and it’s beautiful. But so is my 27 inch iMac that I bought last December. It still looks fantastic. And it holds the Super Drive that I use. Had to order a separate optical for the new iMac. Last years iMac isn’t as thin but who cares if its thin? Not me. They are both great. I hope the lamination holds up on the newer model. So I’m all for thin if it is for a purpose. I guess I’m just a practical guy.
]]>By: inquisitiveEngineerhttp://macdailynews.com/2012/12/24/ipad-5th-gen-due-march-2013-apple-preps-ipad-mini-with-retina-display-says-source/comment-page-2/#comment-1128248
Mon, 24 Dec 2012 20:47:22 +0000http://macdailynews.com/?p=96804#comment-1128248“Lightweight and thinner (4mm in height, 17mm in width, depth 2mm).”

So…5/32 inches by 11/16 inches and thinner than a piece of cardboard? Riiiiiiight. Must be the new iPad postage stamp. Or the latest technology for mice. (The Apple mousePad?)