I just have this feeling but hope I am wrong that whatever number they call it, it will leave out my last capable machine and I am broke so I will for the first time since switching to OSX not be able to upgrade for a long time to come. Oh well!

This is a very unusually awful bit of drivel that spends many paragraphs saying nothing, restating well-known facts as questions ("Will OS X 10.10 be free? Will it be named after a place in California? Is fire hot?") and outright lying (let's see the "leaked" image claimed in the final subhead, because there's not one in the article as it is).

As a regular reader of Macworld, I'm pretty shocked at how utterly pointless and stupid the article is. It doesn't even fulfill its core mission: to summarize what is known about 10.10, or gather the reasonably-credible rumors together. But don't take my word for it: read the article, then the comments.