Answer:
No, classic files created with the new library should becompatible with all older applications, both for reading andwriting, with one minor exception. The exception is due to acorrection of a netCDF bug that prevented creating records largerthan 4 Gi...

Answer:
No, classic files created with the new library should becompatible with all older applications, both for reading andwriting, with one minor exception. The exception is due to acorrection of a netCDF bug that prevented creating records largerthan 4 Gi...

Answer:
The short answer is that under most circumstances, you shouldnot care, if you use version 3.6.0 or later of the netCDF library.But the difference is indicated in the first four bytes of thefile, which are 'C', 'D', 'F', '\001' for the classic netCDF ...

Answer:
The short answer is that under most circumstances, you shouldnot care, if you use version 3.6.0 or later of the netCDF library.But the difference is indicated in the first four bytes of thefile, which are 'C', 'D', 'F', '\001' for the classic netCDF ...

Answer:
No, version 3.6 and later versions of the netCDF C/Fortran library detect which variant ofthe format is used for each file when it is opened for reading orwriting, so it is not necessary to know which variant of the formatis used. The version of the ...

Answer:
There are only two netCDF data models, the classic model and theenhancedmodel (also called the netCDF-4 data model). The classic model isthe simpler of the two, and isused for all data stored in classic format, 64-bit offset format, ornetCDF-4 classi...

Answer:
Yes, but there are significant restrictions on the structure oflarge netCDF files that result from the 32-bit relative offsetsthat are part of the classic netCDF format. For details, seeNetCDF Classic Format Limitations in the User's Guide.

Answer:
Yes, the 3.6 library and all planned future versions of thelibrary will continue to support reading and writing files usingthe classic (32-bit offset) format as well as the 64-bit offsetformat. There is no need to convert existing archives from thec...

Answer:
A new flag, '-k', has been added to ncgen to specify the kind of fileformat variant. By default or if '-k 1' or '-k classic' isspecified, the generated file will be in netCDF classic format. If'-k 2' or '-k 64-bit-offset' is specified, the generated ...

Answer:
In version 4.0 the netCDF API has been extended and implementedon top of the HDF5 data format, for users that have the appropriateHDF5 libraries installed. (Those users without HDF5 are stillable to use netCDF, version 4.0, to create "classic" format...

Answer:
A short document that specifies the format of netCDF classic and 64-bit offset files has been approved as a standard by the NASA ESDS SoftwareProcess Group. In addition, the NetCDF User's Guide contains an appendixwith the same format specification....

Answer:
The short answer is that under most circumstances, you shouldnot care, if you use version 4.0 or later of the netCDF library toaccess data in the file.But the difference is indicated in the first four bytes of thefile, which are 'C', 'D', 'F', '\001'...

Answer:
The enhanced model (sometimes referred to as the netCDF-4 data model)is an extension to the classic model that adds more powerful forms ofdata representation and data types at the expense of some additionalcomplexity. Specifically, it adds six new p...

Answer:
Yes you certainly can, though you might want to keep in mind that once the old abbreviations file is converted to the new format it can no longer be used with the Classic version (one way transfer only).