ET Interview: Video of Grey Alien Interview Smuggled from Area 51

THE
EXTRA-TERRESTRIAL INTERVIEW
IS THIS CONTROVERSIAL VIDEO FACT OR FICTION?
Background
The color video footage, which lasts for a total of two minutes
and fifty-five seconds, was apparently smuggled out of the secret
Groom Lake "Area 51" facility in Nevada by a man referring to himself
as "Victor". The video film depicts a Grey alien being interrogated
at the government facility.
The footage first came to light on the Art Bell radio show on
13th March, 1997 when ufologist Sean David Morton was interviewed.
Morton claimed the interrogation was fairly recent, sometime in
1996, and that renowned UFO expert Bob Dean apparently cried at
the advanced screening of the film.
After claiming to have smuggled the film out of the Groom Lake
facility in Nevada, Victor resolved to have the footage broadcast
on network television as soon as possible in order to pulicly expose
his claims. Victor believes that if his identity is discovered and
he is subsequently assassinated, this would only further help to
confirm the claims and authenticity behind the film.
Victor approached many television companies in his attempts to
show the footage to the public. He first approached Fox TV, who
turned him down after the problems in authenticity they had when
the Roswell autopsy footage was shown by them. Fox felt they were
being deceived for a second time. Eventually, in July 1996, Victor
found an independent production company in Los Angeles, California
called Rocket Home Pictures Productions, who agreed to produce a
documentary based around the interview. Morton was brought in by
Rocket's president, Tom Coleman, to give his views, thus being the
first "outsider" to view the footage.
Contents Of The Video
After seeing the interview footage, Morton provides a chilling
and detailed description of what he saw:
"The film was shot through a large plane of glass. There was no
sound accompanying the images. The interview took place in a darkened
room, lit with an eerie greenish glow, I could make out the silhouettes
of two men, one dressed in military uniform with what appeared to
be the stars on the epaulet of his jacket, and another more casually
dressed man with his hand occassionally rubbing his forehead. They
sat with their backs to the camera at one end of a long table, which
was littered with wires, chords and microphones. There were what
appeared to be medical devices. One in particular was blinking erratically,
as if it was monitoring a very sick heart. And there sitting at
the end of the table was a small, beige-skinned, black-eyed, bulbous
headed creature, the like of which haunt the nightmares of thousands
of unwilling abductees."
Morton made many references to the creature's sick appearance
and condition. The alien made very jerky movements and kept bobbing
up and down. He continued to describe the apparently distressed
state the creature was in.
"Its skin was a pinkish beige, but the rest of the head looked
purple and bruised, as if it had suffered severe contusions across
the skull."
The contents of the tape grew progressively more disturbing. Towards
the end of the tape, the creature goes into what appears to be violent
spasms, as if it was having a seizure. The mouth of the alien opens
and closes before a foam begins to come out. At that point the heart
monitor (as described by Morton) begins to start jumping wildly,
at which point the man in the military looking uniform signals to
a couple of medics, who rush into the frame and aid the alien. As
the doctors treat the alien, the footage suddenly comes to an abrupt
end.
Fact or Fiction?
The authenticity of the footage is seen differently by many people.
Morton is convinced the footage is real due to strong relationships
with stories of alien abductees and the information on the footage
in the lower part of the frame.
I myself am dubious, but do recognise the factors which lead to
its possible true authenticity. The ET's appearance and features
are recognisable as those mentioned by hundreds of abductees. Known
as "The Gourdos" or the more feared "Grey" species, the alien is
instantly recognisable by any Ufologist.
Another factor helping the video's authenticity is the information
etched into the bottom of the video.
The footage has the characters DNI/27 burnt into the bottom
line of the frame, along with what appears to be the time code numbers
for date, minutes and seconds. The letters DNI could be an acronym
for the Department of Naval Intelligence, the group responsible
for the Area 51 base, a fact not many people know about. The DNI
connection to Area 51 has been widely investigated. George Knapp,
the TV journalist who encouraged Bob Lazar to go public with his
knowledge has shown that Lazar's pay cheques from the time he claimed
to be working at Area 51 had DNI stamped on them.
Victor's Reasoning
The best place to possibly determine the authenticity of the alien
interview footage is the source, in this case a mysterious man known
as Victor who won't reveal ANY specific details about himself in
fear of discovery and assassination. If the man is telling the truth
about his background at Area 51, then this is understandable. But
how can the film be verified without any knowledge of it?
The producer of the documentary, Jeff Broadstreet, does know how
Victor took the footage from the base. Victor told him he managed
to obtain a copy of the video when in an unsupervised moment. Broadstreet
stated the following:
"He was assisting in the process of downloading a large amount
of video analogue tape to storage on DVD or digital video disc."
He further explains that Victor deliberately removed the audio
track to protect the identity of the men in the video and to also
help protect his own anonymity. Victor also told the producer that
he thought the man on the left, who is seen with his hand to his
head during much of the segment, is a military telepath apparently
used to assist in communication with the creature.
Since the creature is obviously in a great deal of distress, when
Broadstreet asked if the creature died later, Victor replied cryptically,
"I'm not sure, but I know it was retired from the interview process."
According to Victor, the contents of the removed audio track involved
an attempt at trying to obtain some form of technological information
from the alien about the coordinates of a ship or object. He does
not know, or wouldn't tell, whether the alien was attending the
interview voluntarily or against his will after he had been recovered
from some UFO crash retrieval operation.

It is real...it is real in the sense of all the recent historic information that is now among the masses regarding aliens and ufo's. Someone wants
this information leaked whether it is true or not. What needs to be determined is why. Why are we being bombarded by aliens and ufo information? What
is the agenda in regards to this? My sense is that it has to do with the agenda of those who want to control people. It is a massive world-wide
Hegelian Dialectic.

The process of the Hegelian Dialectic is the idea that conflict causes or creates history.

"In Hegelian terms, an existing force (thesis) generates a counterforce (antithesis). Conflict between the two forces results in the forming of a
synthesis. Then the process starts all over again: Thesis vs. antithesis results in synthesis."

So again, the question is, why are we being fed all this information about aliens and ufo's on such a large scale? If it isn't true then someone has
an amazing agenda.

Cocco the agenda is money. People create fakes to get rich quick or to make a living at selling books about nonsense so they don't have to get their
butt up every day and go to work like most of us. Sean David Morton is a terrible predictor of the future and I don't know how he got the claim as a
"ufologist". I wish I remembered the site...try google...but the site tracked past predictions of Morton and many others and boy are these guys
lousy.

Now I do agree with you about there being some truth behind the flood of info, but you have to be very selective about where this info is coming from
and do some background checks on it. Honestly, when the military has people coming forward and saying this stuff isn't ours and especially when you
look back at the 40's and 50's UFO reports where these craft were doing things that might be plausible today but in no way were in existance on
Earth at that time...you really only can come to one conclusion. But just because aliens may very much be here, doesn't mean you should listen to
the latest guy on Coast 2 Coast who says he's got the "real" story.

The thing I like about this Victor film is that the "grey" is pink! Which has been stated by some ex-military as being the color of the aliens.
They supposedly have silver/grey jumpsuits, yet their skin tone is reportedly a pinkish-pale-grey color. Unfortunately this video is just too
unprovable to really say yea or nay and unless this Victor guy comes out and can prove he worked there then all this is just something to say hmmmm.
And having Morton's name attached to this video in any way makes it very suspicious.

You people make me laugh ....Nice short answers with one purpose ....Plant the seed of doubt..Don't just say it's a fake without a valid reason, If
it is a fake then we need to see valid arguments why?? the same as we need valid arguments for it's authenticity. I personally am in two minds,
questions I have are 1. why are they shining lights in it's eyes and grappling with it?? 2. Why is the video poor quality I worked in Navy intel
and Know there are military Video and photographers who could make it very clear, what was the purpose of filming this to the military?/ ..It seems
EVERYTIME a post is made with a photograph or video or ufo ..Someone ALWAYS shouts 'Fake' but with NO supporting evidence ..Jeez < Shakes head >

You people make me laugh ....Nice short answers with one purpose ....Plant the seed of doubt..

Oh, and people shouldn't doubt what they see? That is the path to ignorance. I don't accept every conspircay and alien video there are, I try to
look at both the "believer" side, and the "skeptics". I suggest people to do this. Alongside with checking the source, who said it, what channels
are sending it? etc...

1. why are they shining lights in it's eyes and grappling with it??

Good point. But ask yourself this: how do people communicate with the alien? Can we understand what it says? etc...

2. Why is the video poor quality I worked in Navy intel and Know there are military Video and photographers who could make it very clear, what
was the purpose of filming this to the military?

Well, because if the footage would be clear, we would probably see the fake right away. The hoaxers want us to wonder wheter it is a real alien or
not.

/ ..It seems EVERYTIME a post is made with a photograph or video or ufo ..Someone ALWAYS shouts 'Fake' but with NO supporting evidence ..Jeez
< Shakes head >

What else should people do? Do you have supporting evidence that the footage is real?

Why doesn't people ask themselves how these tapes really get out? The Alien Autopsy got out, yet, we only recieved the copy. This movie was copied
too. Wow, so they can get anything but the original out of any military installation... hmm... strange. I'm sure there will be another one, and
another one after that one, and so on.

And when the day comes when a really good fake is released, and people believe in it, then they will continue their story with books, info, and so
on. Everything to sell and get money for their hoax, if not make another one.

it looks like some guy wearing an alien suit.

Looks like a doll to me..., more like a lage muppet.

He further explains that Victor deliberately removed the audio
track to protect the identity of the men in the video and to also
help protect his own anonymity.

How does he expect us to believe the footage, and ever get to the truth, if we can't ever hear anything they said?

George Knapp, the TV journalist who encouraged Bob Lazar to go public with his knowledge has shown that Lazar's pay cheques from the time he
claimed to be working at Area 51 had DNI stamped on them.

Another thing that makes it even more faked. As I said, Lazar is a fake. George Knapp is, apparently, a sloppy journalist by the way. The DNI could
very well proove to be a link between the fakes.

Also, note that they never mention why the room is so dark. "Victor" doesn't even mentions if the alien is alergic or something. Yet, it is
strange. Let's assume they kept the room dark because the alien don't or can't see in bright areas, then why do the doctors shine flashlights into
the creature's eyes?

Rocket Home Pictures Productions

Not exactly CNN or Fox TV, is it?

Victor believes that if his identity is discovered and
he is subsequently assassinated, this would only further help to
confirm the claims and authenticity behind the film.

I find this most ironic. The Alien Autopsy flick didn't proove the source material, so "they" (the ones knowing it all about aliens and etc)
didn't have a need to cover it up, let alone kill anyone.

Now, this movie has been aired without any proof. See where this is going? If the first and second can't be prooved, or even won't, then what reason
are there for people to believe that any future footage is real? Because if the day comes when a real footage is aired, people won't believe it
because there have been so much hoaxes and claims, and no proof at all, that they don't have any reason to even watch the "real footage". Know what
I mean?

The footage first came to light on the Art Bell radio show on
13th March, 1997 when ufologist Sean David Morton was interviewed.

I've heard some bad things about this Art Bell. Why air it there? Why not air it to the general public first, and then to UFOlogists?

I don't think this will ever be proved or disproved, but I will say that it is a pretty convincing video. The fact that "Victor" does not want to
be identified proves that this is not some sort of money making scheme trying to reap a profit from a hoax. Although, if this video was snagged the
way it was explained above, I would not be surprised if the person has already been offed. I'm sure the government knows exactly who was working with
the video downloads-to-dvd and if they did, this person either would have to

Get out of the country

Shave his/her head and become a hermit

Last but not least, stick his/her head between legs and kiss butt goodby

So my opinion on this really doesn't state a conclusion, but it raises more questions. Although the video looks real enough-the means by which the
video was aquired leads me to believe that it is a hoax. It is possible that the information on how the video was taken could have been fabricated
just to place responsibility on an innocent person though. Another thing that is very convincing is the info on the bottom of the video.

Originally posted by Kata
The fact that "Victor" does not want to be identified proves that this is not some sort of money making scheme trying to reap a profit from a hoax.

I think that the fact that Victor can´t be identified is because there´s no Victor and never been. The hoaxers created this character because the
video must had an origin. "Victor" may not have made a nickel from this, but what about the people producing the TV shows? I doubt they did it just
to reveal the truth to people...

I agree with Mynaeris, it is a puppet for me. Dimly light to make it harder to see the strings (HA!)

I think that the fact that Victor can´t be identified is because there´s no Victor and never been. The hoaxers created this character because the
video must had an origin. "Victor" may not have made a nickel from this, but what about the people producing the TV shows? I doubt they did it just
to reveal the truth to people...

Your have a very valid point. That is why I had said that this probably will never be proven or disproven simply because I can rebut by saying to you
"Prove to me that Victor doesn't exist". I completely agree that this may be a hoax, but my personal opinion is not that it IS real, but it looks
authentic to me.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.