BE IT RESOLVED that the Green Party seeks to introduce and support legislation that will ban artificial fluoridation products in public drinking water.

Motion Operative:

WHEREAS the Green Party affirms that the precautionary principle should be used where there is evidence of potential harm in the absence of complete scientific consensus.

WHEREAS no statistical difference exists in rates of dental caries between areas that use artificial water fluoridation chemicals and those that do not (Statistics Canada);

WHEREAS fluoride is not removed in sewage treatment and remains a toxic constituent of the effluent discharged by treatment plants to rivers and lakes, and background levels of fluoride in the Great Lakes exceed the Canadian Water Quality Guideline (CWQG) for aquatic species, and fluoride concentrations in sewage effluent are 5-10 times in excess of the CWQG. At these concentrations fluoride is known to be toxic to a variety of water species such as salmon, caddisfly, daphnia & others;

WHEREAS the use of drinking water to deliver medications is not medically or environmentally sustainable, and the use of unregulated, unapproved medications in drinking water, without a prescription or informed consent is medically and environmentally not sustainable, and the daily dose of fluoride cannot be controlled and health effects from fluoride are not monitored;

Green Party of Canada website 22 August 2010 an area that has traditionally been within the jurisdiction of the provinces.

WHEREAS 97 percent of Europe does not use artificial water fluoridation products in their public drinking water supply, and 94 percent of the world’s population does not use artificial water fluoridation products in their public water supply;

Motion Preamble:

WHEREAS fluoridation products such as hexafluorosilicic acid and sodium silicofluoride are toxic by-products scrubbed from the smokestacks of the phosphate mining industry, and less than one percent of treated water is actually ingested by people and the remaining 99 percent is discharged into the environment…

THE AUSTRALIAN GREENS

HE IS A SUPPORTER OF FLUORIDATION !

The Australian Greens are divided about science and
when it comes to fluoridation, or, far worse, vaccination;and a large majority are firmly against all forms of Genetic Engineering, which is a problem for
Dr. Richard Di Natale who is the current leader of the Greens Party Of Australia.

Prior to entering parliament, Dr. Richard Di Natale wasa general practitioner and public health specialist.The Australian Greens under Di Natale havelost the plot, and some of their voters.Di Natale is pro-fluoridation, pro-vaccines,soft on GMOs and against whole milk.It is a conflict of policy to bepro-fluoridation and anti-nuclear!

– We at ‘Fluoridation Australia’ are anti-fluoridation and anti-nuclear.-

[ Could this split be the end of ‘The Australian Greens’ ? ]

“Some one needs to explain to me why wanting clean drinking water
makes you an activist, and why proposing to destroy water with
chemical warfare doesn’t make a corporation a terrorist.”Winona LaDuke
[She ran for vice president as the nominee of theGreen Party of the United States, on a ticket headed by Ralph Nader.]