Hey guys, this is the Vittala
Temple at Hampi and I discovered a carving of a dinosaur in a remote part of
the temple. Watch the video below or read on.

As you can see, it clearly looks like a dinosaur: It has a long
pointed face, and has short and stout legs.

Now, before we go any further, let's take a step back and look at it objectively if this carving could be some other animal, like a camel. We can also find carvings of camels in the same area, which makes it very easy to compare them side by side.On the left, you can see a man
on a camel. Without a doubt this is a camel, has a rounded snout, has protruding
earlobes and large eyes.

However, the carving on the right shows a pointed
snout, no earlobes, and the eye is carved so small, its almost gone due to corrosion. The neck of the camel is remarkably thin, but
you can see that the neck of the animal on the right is very thick, a typical feature we see in
many different species of dinosaurs, like Camarasaurus for example. Here, you
can also see the pointed snout, lack of earlobes and the small eyes, remarkably
similar to the carving I found. The neck in this carving clearly goes all the
way down to the legs, another typical feature of a dinosaur, as opposed to the
camel's neck, which ends above the legs, proving that the carving on the right
is in fact, a dinosaur. I am not gonna bore you with other details like how the
dinosaur's legs are short and thick, while the camel's legs are long and
slender, etc.

Okay, so a dinosaur is carved in
the Temple of Hampi, so what? The problem is, scientists say that Dinosaurs became
extinct 65 million years ago. And historians say the Hampi temple was built
just 600 years ago. How could a temple built in the last 600 years show an
accurate carving of a dinosaur, which became extinct 65 million years ago? Is
it possible that Dinosaurs existed 600 years ago, so the sculptors could carve
what they were looking at? No, it is not possible, because people would have
recorded these creatures on history books, and we would find these dinosaur
bones easily, almost at ground level. What experts find are fossilized bones of
dinosaurs, confirming that dinosaurs became extinct millions of years ago.
Since it is impossible that dinosaurs existed 600 years ago, is it possible
that this temple was built millions of years ago? This sounds ridiculous
because experts say human beings were not even there, millions of years ago,
they evolved from apes much later, only about 1 million years ago.

So, again we have to step back
and ask ourselves, Is it possible that this isolated carving was just made by a
bad sculptor? Did a sculptor, who lived 600 years ago, try to carve a camel,
and it ended up looking like this? However, this is not an isolated carving in
a Hindu temple, we have other examples as well. This is a carving at a Hindu
temple called Ta Prohm in Cambodia.

See, this clearly shows a dinosaur species
called a stegosaurus. If we assume that the sculptor at Hampi made a mistake,
how do we explain this figure, which does not resemble any animal that we see today?
Archeologists say that this temple in Cambodia was built just 800 years ago. If
experts are right, how was a stegosaurus carved by primitive human beings 800
years ago? From both these carvings, we can absolutely confirm that these
carvings do show dinosaurs.

So, again the question that
needs to be asked is this: Is it possible that these Hindu temples were built
millions of years ago? This is the only logical possibility. Did ancient human
beings coexist with dinosaurs? We have to agree that there is something
seriously wrong with our history books.

You can take a history book that
is thousand pages long, and you don't find anything about these things. Why? If
historians agree that ancient human beings built these temples 65 million years
ago, they would have to say that man did not evolve from apes in the last 1 million
years. They would have to agree that human beings were really sophisticated and
possessed advanced technology and they were not a product of evolution, as
scientists claim. So, they just abandon these carvings, so nobody can see them.
You can see this priceless carving is surrounded by weeds, and nobody is going
to bother looking at it to find out what it is. The Ta Prohm temple in Cambodia
is also in ruins, who knows what other spectacular information is still hiding
there?

Now, how do experts know that
the Temple at Hampi was built just 600 years ago? Do they have any conclusive
evidence that points to these dates? To this, experts agree that they don't
have any solid evidence like radio carbon dating, and they don't have
inscriptions in this temple that points to specific dates. Archeologists have
found inscriptions in a much smaller temple nearby which was built 600 years
ago.

Therefore, they automatically assigned the same date to this temple which
is much larger. If the same person built
the two temples, why didn't he put the inscription on this much larger, magnificent
temple? So, we don't have any solid evidence that confirms that this temple was
built just 600 years ago. While archeologists stick to the theory of 600 year
old structure, locals tell a radically different history about this temple.

In India, every temple had its
own history called Sthala Purana, before the arrival of modern history books. Locals
claim that even though this place is called Hampi now, the original name of
this place is called Kishkinta. In fact,
many people still refer to this place as Kishkinta, which is mentioned in ancient
Indian books. These books tell us that mankind and these temples existed for
many million years and human beings had a superior technology than what we have
today.

While historians say these
ancient texts were basically imaginary stories created just 2 thousand years
ago, the ancient texts claim that they are millions of years old. The Rig Veda,
the oldest text in India, is full of secrets and repeatedly mentions another
extinct animal called Ashva. Many people think that Ashva means horse, however
the text clearly mentions that this species had 34 ribs. The horses we see
today have 36 ribs. In the same temple, there are carvings showing human beings
riding these extinct animals, which look completely different from horses. Evolution
Scientists agree that no species can grow 2 extra ribs in a course of just two
thousand years.

Such evolution can take place only in a course of millions of
years. And these animals have strange features including a trunk and protruding
teeth. Are these just mythical animals or did they actually exist once upon a
time, along with human beings?

Why do ancient scriptures all
around the world talk of these strange animals and dragons? Why are the dragons
shown as large, flying creatures that terrified human beings? All ancient
civilizations, including India talk about these ferocious animals. The term
"dinosaur" was coined only in 1842. Were they called dragons before
this term was used?

More importantly, did dinosaurs coexist with human beings?
Something is definitely wrong with our history and science, and most
importantly, something is terribly wrong with our understanding of the timeline
of human history.

So, what do you think? Were
ancient Indian temples built millions of years ago? How else could these
carvings accurately depict dinosaurs which became extinct 65 million years ago?
Do you believe that human beings evolved from apes? Or was man created by Gods,
as all scriptures claim?