International Sustainability Standards and Certification

Abstract

Standards have evolved as the major mode of governance for biofuels. In particular, the European Union (EU) policy approach actively employs a variety of voluntary certification standards under its meta-standard in order to safeguard sustainability of its mandated biofuel demand. Advantages and disadvantages of this novel, hybrid governance arrangement have been widely discussed. In order to fully understand the implications of this international governance arrangement, we argue that more research is required to determine the dynamics that evolve in specific contexts as to whether standards come to matter and which. In this chapter, we highlight two macro-level factors of such dynamics—markets and policy—for the geographic focus of this volume: Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). The current adoption of standards reflects the production and trade patterns of the region. EU sustainability criteria are most relevant for the biodiesel exporting industry in Argentina, while the US standard for greenhouse gas (GHG) savings influences Brazilian ethanol producers. Showing a tendency to minimal compliance, the current standard adoption in Argentina points at problematic dynamics within the EU Renewable Energy Directive (RED) governance arrangement. Weak regulatory and policy frameworks may pose barriers to the uptake of certification standards. Especially in LAC, where biofuel production often developed from already existing flex crop industries, biofuel policy is embedded in multiple sectoral policy areas and historical agrarian structures. The EU’s 100 % captive market for certified biofuels is likely to help overcoming this barrier. However, further research is urgently needed as to whether certification in weak policy contexts has complementarity or cosmetic effects.

Elgert L (2013) Shifting the debate about ‘responsible’ soy production in Paraguay: a critical analysis of five claims about environmental, economic, and social sustainability. LDPI Working Paper 23, Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies, University of the Western Cape, South Africa. http://​www.​plaas.​org.​za/​plaas-publication/​ldpi-23. Accessed 24 July 2013

Fortin E (2011) Multi-stakeholder initiatives to regulate biofuels: the roundtable for sustainable biofuels. Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing, April 6–8, 2011, organized by the Land Deals Politics Initiative (LDPI)

German L, Schoneveld GC, Pacheco P (2011) The social and environmental impacts of biofuel feedstock cultivation: evidence from multi-site research in the forest frontier. Ecol Soc 16(3). doi:10.5751/ES-04309-160324

Johnson A (2012) Green governance or green grab? The biopolitics of the Round Table on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) and its processes in Ecuador. Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing II, October 17–19, 2012, organized by the Land Deals Politics Initiative (LDPI)

Marin V, Lovett JC, Clancy JS (2011) Biofuels and land appropriation in Colombia: do biofuels national policies fuel land grabs? Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing, April 6–8, 2011, organized by the Land Deals Politics Initiative (LDPI)

Matus K (2009) Standardization, certification and labeling: lessons from theory and practice. Working Paper No. 37, Center for International Development at Harvard University

Pacheco P, Benatti JH (2012) Land appropriation under changing environmental governance in the Amazon: the cases of lowland Bolivia and the State of Para, Brazil. Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing II, organized by the Land Deals Politics Initiative (LDPI), Department of Development Sociology at Cornell University, Ithaca

Suich H, Tacconi L (2012) Deforestation, governance and economics: a survey of perceptions of causes and policies. Paper presented at the International Society for Ecological Economics, 16–19 June 2012, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil