6 critical teacher policies states should monitor (continued)

Six specific areas merit states’ full attention:
• Invest in data systems to address issues relating to teacher shortages and surpluses. Despite the alarming talk of teacher shortages, few states are collecting and connecting the full set of high-quality data necessary to support their districts in making fact-based decisions regarding targeted, local solutions to address teacher supply and demand issues, and no state has established clear parameters that govern the number of teachers trained in each major certification area.
• Increase transparency regarding educator equity to ensure that vulnerable student groups are not systemically underserved by ineffective teachers. Fewer than one third of all states collect and publicly report all necessary data to identify where traditionally underserved students do not have equitable access to effective teachers.
• Expand diversity in the teaching workforce. Fewer than half of all states are taking any concrete action to increase teacher diversity under a specific initiative, incentive program, or system of supports.
• Increase oversight of teacher-preparation programs. Fewer than half of all states articulate minimum standards of performance for teacher-preparation programs, and among states that do maintain minimum performance standards, even fewer have articulated consequences for programs that do not meet such standards.
• Improve the preparation of special education teachers. Only nine states require teacher candidates in elementary special education to possess basic content knowledge before they can earn a license, and only 12 states measure special education candidates’ knowledge of how to teach reading, even though reading difficulties are the most common reason for special education referrals.
• Fully utilize teacher evaluation systems. Only 10 states explicitly require that evaluation results inform teacher compensation in some manner, and only 11 states explicitly require teacher-leadership opportunities to be reserved only for highly rated teachers.

Despite significant room for improvement, some bright spots exist within the 2017 data. For example, many states have in place commendable policies to help ensure that student-teaching requirements are appropriately targeted to the grades and subjects the teachers will be teaching; teachers are evaluated across more than two rating categories; and principals are rated, in part, on the effectiveness of their teachers and on their instructional leadership of the school.

“States’ teacher policies have an enormous impact on the quality of education in the state,” said Ross. “By highlighting opportunities for improvement, as well as strong policies, this Yearbook is designed to catalyze state action. We have seen the progress states are capable of making and urge them to attend to sub-optimal policies that decrease the health of the teaching profession. Teachers and students deserve nothing less.”

The 2017 Yearbook evaluates states against nine policy goals, including, for the first time, information to reflect teacher-diversity initiatives, principal evaluation and support systems, and state support for teacher-leadership opportunities. For each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, NCTQ produces a customized summary that provides state policy strengths and opportunities for improvement.

Laura Ascione

Laura Ascione is the Managing Editor, Content Services at eSchool Media. She is a graduate of the University of Maryland's prestigious Philip Merrill College of Journalism. Find Laura on Twitter: @eSN_Laurahttp://twitter.com/eSN_Laura