Season is too long, salaries way too high, a lot of the players are pricks, tired of seeing NBA primetime when there's better college games on, they play basketball in June , etc.

How does any of that relate to NCAA being better?

The season is longer because it's a pro sport, and why would you want a shorter season to begin with?

How do player salaries make the sport any less enjoyable to watch? Most of the guys that might be considered "pricks" are a lot of fun to watch and make the game exciting, even if you may not agree with their antics off the court. (Not to mention there's a whole lot more pricks in the NFL, or any pro sport for that matter)

And NBA games are more exciting to watch because the level of competition is much higher than college, and almost every team has 1 or 2 guys that make great plays night in and night out. College has top 25 ranked teams playing random tiny state schools and blowing them out by 35 points every night.

The season is longer because it's a pro sport, and why would you want a shorter season to begin with?

How do player salaries make the sport any less enjoyable to watch? Most of the guys that might be considered "pricks" are a lot of fun to watch and make the game exciting, even if you may not agree with their antics off the court. (Not to mention there's a whole lot more pricks in the NFL, or any pro sport for that matter)

And NBA games are more exciting to watch because the level of competition is much higher than college, and almost every team has 1 or 2 guys that make great plays night in and night out. College has top 25 ranked teams playing random tiny state schools and blowing them out by 35 points every night.

So what's better about the NCAA?

Everything I was about to say, saved me some typing... Vikes post is completly irrelevant to what he is trying to support.

__________________
Wild'n Cuz I'm Young... The True Cudder Stan.

"Thank the Lord for that burning bush, that big body Benz I was born to push..." - Just What IAm

The season is longer because it's a pro sport, and why would you want a shorter season to begin with?

How do player salaries make the sport any less enjoyable to watch? Most of the guys that might be considered "pricks" are a lot of fun to watch and make the game exciting, even if you may not agree with their antics off the court. (Not to mention there's a whole lot more pricks in the NFL, or any pro sport for that matter)

And NBA games are more exciting to watch because the level of competition is much higher than college, and almost every team has 1 or 2 guys that make great plays night in and night out. College has top 25 ranked teams playing random tiny state schools and blowing them out by 35 points every night.

So what's better about the NCAA?

Shorter season makes the games actually matter. The college players have to actually try to earn their salaries when they are pros. The NBA has Clippers, they'd finish in the middle or bottom of Big 10, ACC. The big games in college with top 25 teams are much better than the big pro games

Shorter season makes the games actually matter. The college players have to actually try to earn their salaries when they are pros. The NBA has Clippers, they'd finish in the middle or bottom of Big 10, ACC. The big games in college with top 25 teams are much better than the big pro games

WHAT!

Longer seasons...Pros...hello?

Make them matter? Last season the Western conference was SO CLOSE! That made EVERY game count. It also avoids fluke wins.

NCAA cant even be compared to NBA...

They are on COMPLETLY different levels, thats why only a selct group of players are drafted every year, and most of them just wind up in Europe, the D-League, or without a job!

__________________
Wild'n Cuz I'm Young... The True Cudder Stan.

"Thank the Lord for that burning bush, that big body Benz I was born to push..." - Just What IAm

Shorter season makes the games actually matter. The college players have to actually try to earn their salaries when they are pros. The NBA has Clippers, they'd finish in the middle or bottom of Big 10, ACC. The big games in college with top 25 teams are much better than the big pro games

NO WAY!!!!!! Are you crazy?? Blake Griffin was the Naismith POY in college and Eric Gordon was a beast in college. They would easily be a 1 seed in the NCAA tournament especially with Bledsoe and Aminu who were both stars in college and with both Baron Davis and Chris Kaman in the starting lineup.

Shorter season makes the games actually matter. The college players have to actually try to earn their salaries when they are pros. The NBA has Clippers, they'd finish in the middle or bottom of Big 10, ACC. The big games in college with top 25 teams are much better than the big pro games

Games still matter. Notice how the Western conference seeding these past few seasons has been determined by only a handful of games.

Also, that's a ridiculous statement to make. The Clippers would be national championship contenders every year! They are an NBA team with all NBA talent guys who were drafted or made teams. Even big college teams (KU, KY, NC) typically only have 1-2 NBA caliber players. 11 NBA players vs. 2 + fillers that will never play in the pros. Who wins that match-up? Especially since Oklahoma was a championship contender back when Blake Griffin was there- imagine Blake coming back with an entire NBA roster. . . .