UPDATE: 11:45AM – Kumi has been arrested and is being taken to Greenland in a helicopter.

As he climbed the 30 metre ladder rig operators tried to stop him making it to the platform by dousing him with a freezing jet of water fired from a powerful water cannon.

But, despite being soaked to the skin and freezing cold, Kumi made it to the top to deliver the 50,000 strong petition and demand that Cairn immediately halt drilling operations and leave the Arctic.

In a final radio transmission to the Esperanza he said:

“It looks like I’m being arrested now. They say I’m going to be taken to Greenland, but what happens after that I don’t know. I did this because Arctic oil drilling is one of the defining environmental battles of our age. I’m an African but I care deeply about what’s happening up here. The rapidly melting cap of Arctic sea ice is a grave warning to all of us, so it’s nothing short of madness that companies like Cairn see it as a chance to drill for the fossil fuels that got us into this climate change mess in the first place. We have to draw a line and say no more. I’m drawing that line here and now in the Arctic ice.”

06:30 am - Kumi Naidoo, the Executive Director of Greenpeace International has crossed into an exclusion zone and scaled a controversial Arctic oil rig 120km off the coast of Greenland.

At 6:45 am this morning an inflatable speedboat carrying Kumi was launched from the Greenpeace ship Esperanza. It evaded a Danish navy warship that has been circling the rig for several weeks and delivered Kumi to the base of the rig where he climbed 30 metres up the outside of one of the platform's giant legs.

Before leaving the Esperanza he told us why he was doing it:

After a freezing dash out from the coast of Greenland in a small boat to meet the Esperanza, I'm now preparing to leave again at first light to board the Cairn oil rig Leiv Eiriksson.

With one companion I'll follow in the footsteps of the twenty Greenpeace activists who've gone before me in the past two weeks. Together they prevented Cairn's reckless deep sea oil drilling here in the Arctic for a total of five days.

Most of them spent almost two weeks in jail and have been deported for their trouble.

Cairn's response was an attempt to silence peaceful protest with a massive lawsuit against Greenpeace International. In it they demanded we pay 2 million euro for each day our action prevented their oil drilling operation. But, despite a small army of expensive lawyers, it didn't go Cairn's way in court. The judge awarded them far less than they asked for and even questioned why Cairn didn't publish its oil spill response plan as we asked.

What's a spill response plan? It's the document that an oil company has to draw up explaining how it would clean up a spill. They are nearly always made public, but Cairn is keeping its one secret. Why? Because you can't clean up an Arctic oil spill, that's what the experts say, and publishing the plan would show that Cairn hasn't got a viable plan.

We have made repeated requests for Cairn's oil spill plan, including phone calls, faxes, emails, a visit to the company's UK headquarters and finally our delegation of 18 boarding the rig. Cairn claims the Greenland authorities won't allow it to publish the spill plan, but Greenpeace has legal advice making it clear that Cairn could easily publish the plan if it wanted to. It's standard industry practice.

Cairn is keeping the plan secret because it knows it is not worth the paper it is written on. Cairn is hiding it from the people of Greenland whose real economy depends on fisheries and a clean environment. It is hiding it from Greenpeace because it knows it cannot clean up a spill. It is hiding it from its investors who, if they knew the full extent of the risks, would think twice about investing.

In the final hearing the court did stipulate that Greenpeace is liable for 50,000 euro for each further day we interfere with Cairn's drilling. It's far less than Cairn asked for, but still a significant sum.

I have with me the names of 50,000 people who emailed Cairn to demand they publish their spill response plan. I am about to go aboard the rig to deliver those 50,000 names with a personal call that Cairn leaves the Arctic.

For me this is one of the defining environmental battles of our age, it's a fight for sanity against the madness of those who see the disappearance of the Arctic sea ice as an opportunity to profit. As the ice retreats the oil companies want to send the rigs in and drill for the fossil fuels that got us into this mess in the first place.

Fossil fuel driven climate change is already making life hard for millions. I have seen this first hand where I come from in Africa and it will only get worse unless we can phase out our addiction to oil.

We have to draw a line somewhere and I say we draw that line here today.

The Arctic oil rush is such a serious threat to the climate, to this beautiful fragile place and to our hopes for a better future that I felt we had no choice. So I volunteered to come to the rig and make a personal appeal backed by Greenpeace supporters everywhere to call for an end to this dangerous arctic oil drilling.

Cairn has something to hide, they won't dare publish their plan to clean up an oil spill here in the Arctic, and that's because it can't be done. I'm going onto that rig to give them the names of fifty thousand people who've emailed them to demand they publish their plan, and I won't leave until I have it in my hands.

Post a comment

OPTIONAL: Register to avoid filling out forms each time you post a comment
Sign Up Here
login via Facebook or Google

(Unregistered) Daithesci
says:

Dear Ryan,

That was impressively wrong.

1) Greenpeace *are* hypocrites for using oil. Oil drilling is *always* dangerous. By purchasing the product of these dangerous wells they are supporting the oil industry where it matters most - cash. They ask us to move to renewable energy onshore (i.e. wind), well renewable energy has been available and used by offshore for over 3000 years. There are *no* excuses for them not using it. If they don't then they have *no* right to lecture anybody else about it.
2) A spill in this region is *not* impossible to clean up. All oil spills are bad (but GP still buys from those rigs..), but cold weather actually aids burning of the oil as it becomes thicker - something that is not possible in warmer weather as the oil is too dilute in the seawater to burn well. The "impossible" quote comes from one line from one email, when the guy was quoting an NGO - probably Greenpeace!
3) Icebergs off Nuuk are very very rare. This part of Greenland is warmed by the gulfstream. It does not freeze over either. All icebergs are plotted by plane and satellite (www.icebergfinder.com) , and move at under 4mph. They will have several weeks of prior notice of any icebergs that do show up
4) Compared to comparable rigs this drill site is *not*: More remote, deeper, nor more northern. There are rigs that have been operating for several *decades* at the same latitude in northern Norway. There are rigs further north in Russia.

Post a comment

OPTIONAL: Register to avoid filling out forms each time you post a comment
Sign Up Here
login via Facebook or Google

(Unregistered) Daithesci
says:

@Ryan,

Regarding GP's fuel usage: GP latest available accounts show that they used over *6 Million Kg* of CO2 for their boats, at 2.68 Kg...

@Ryan,

Regarding GP's fuel usage: GP latest available accounts show that they used over *6 Million Kg* of CO2 for their boats, at 2.68 Kg of CO2 per litre of diesel, that's *2.2 MILLION Litres!!!*, or to put it another way around £1.5 ($2.42) MILLION that GP pay *direct* to the oil companies - in order to protest about OIL!

They also used nearly *10 Million Kg* on "Business Travel". Assuming that's Plane travel (Kumi didn't walk from Japan to Greenland), at 2.65 Kg per litre, that's *3.7 MILLION Litres* of aviation fuel. At $0.85 a litre, that's $3.14 MILLION *direct* to the Oil companies

Add other odds and sods, and It will be nearly $6 MILLION USD that GP pay to the OIL COMPANIES every year.

Post a comment

OPTIONAL: Register to avoid filling out forms each time you post a comment
Sign Up Here
login via Facebook or Google

(Unregistered) Daithesci
says:

@ Mr Davies

1) How lucky GP are to have gullible idiots to pay its way for them. Back on planet earth the "little people" like ...

@ Mr Davies

1) How lucky GP are to have gullible idiots to pay its way for them. Back on planet earth the "little people" like us have to pay our own way, scrap our own cars to buy electric cars for example. Even totally ignoring the utter waste involved in terms of scrapping one vehicle to buy another, the "solution" is beyond stupid. Electric vehicles have a range of around 200 miles - but take 8 hours or so to recharge. So a journey of anything over 200miles will be essentially an overnight journey. Hello GP! Is anyone in?

Plus *How Obscenely Expensive* is this new boat? For Christs sake: GP have over 28 Million Euros sitting in their account! Are you suggesting this boat costs *MORE* than that? There are literally *Thousands* of sailing boats available right now for fractions of that amount.

2) The laughable farce that is the article that you linked to is so utterly wrong in all it's main points. I've already commented there, so I won't repeat myself. I suggest you educate yourself by reading them