Thursday, July 31, 2008

INSHA-ALLAH

Issue: whether or not continue law

The FACTS

As architect ,I have had enough sacrifices and torments during my 6 years plus 2 years of apprenticeship ,not to mention the “Madugong” board exam .As a matter of fact I still even have the scars . But as the old quote goes,” ALL MEN by Nature desire knowledge” :and so do i in studying Law...

But what about the over rated purse in legal profession?That goes without saying,it’s an additional gain. besides,it has always been my father’s prayer for one of his fruits become a lawyer to support the family ,thus, I believe I am the one left to make it happen 'cos all of my 3 sis are obviously contented with their status so much so that they cannot use my fathers Surname anymore. no supplement to my fathers dream kung di TANGCALAGAN ang nkasulat after ATTY. Hehe.SAHE wala LAh?!(peace Tols!). thus, I am the only one along for the ride to bring that famous ”bacon” home (bakit nga ba bacon ron?) : .

With this on my mind,im narrowly convinced to continue law in the next 1 or 2 years.I ‘ll be 3rd year by then and hopefully if I’ll survive ,keep going and finally try the BAR.InshaalaH.and while im here, might as well continue browsing some cases and facts in re: law.. its free anyway. Of course I wont neglect Architecture and teaching,. I love my job so much that I always want to upgrade myself just to share new ideas to my students and improve my design perceptions .,they say,”Real success is finding your lifework in the work that you love” ..seemingly, I love architecture,teaching and lying….(wrong spelling, lawyering pala) by hook or by crook tuloy ang laban …di baleng sabay lahat yan…,Bahala na si batman.

WHEREFORE,. I faithfully pray for that impossible dream to happen, more importantly the capital A –T-T-Y period before my name! ...INSHAALAH!...so help me God.

3 comments:

*While Carlos was approaching his car, he saw it being driven away by Paolo, a thief. Carlos tried to stop Paolo by shouting at him, but Paolo ignored him. To prevent his car from being carnapped, Carlos drew his gun, aimed at the rear wheel of the car and fired. The shot blew the tire which caused the car to veer out of control and collide with an oncoming tricycle, killing the tricycle driver.

a)Carlos may be held liable for reckless imprudence resulting to homicide for the death of the tryke driver. The means by which he tried to defend his right to property appears to have been excessive considering the time and place of the incident.

b)Paolo is obviously liable for carnapping. Also, applying Art. 4 of the RPC, he may also be held liable for homicide. No complex crime tho, bec. carnapping is penalized under a special penal law, while homicide under RPC.