Enjoyed the vid. With the KK hand does the CREV simulation factor in the possibility that villain may bluff-jam and fully realise equity of hands that are otherwise folding if not getting the odds vs flop jam?

@3/14: Yeah, old problem of mine, you should hear me talking in German. :D But thanks, I´ll pay attention to it in the future.

@11: Please teach me. :)

@16: Good point! But no, my simulation did not take that scenario into account, I tried to keep it as simple as possible, and I doubt it will change results that much, but you´re right, if we wanted to fully and precisely solve it - we had to consider that as well.

@17: There are four parts - already produced, they should be published soon.

Example 2) In all the GTO solutions I've calculated, almost all hands are played with a mixed strategy. For example, my solution for Janda's example hand 1, which is a similar board, has most AKo 75% check, 25% bet. I think this is because at equilibrium everything is so well balanced that the options for most hands have equal EV. Of course, that's not really Harrington's argument.

Example 3) If you'd have asked me nicely, I'd have calculated the full GTO solution for two given ranges and that flop. I think that would be interesting.