People living in neighborhoods with low gun ownership like DC, compared to
people living in high gun ownership areas like North Dakota, are 9 times more
likely to have their car stolen (1,449 vs. 151), 100 times more likely to be
robbed (1,107 vs. 11), twice as likely to be raped (43.7 vs. 23.4), 350 times
more likely to be murdered (70 vs. 0.2), 9 times more likely to be assaulted
(1,442 vs. 166), and 5 times more likely to be burglarized (1,761 vs. 325).

Note that the FBI considers "White" in the following statistics to include
Hispanics and "White Hispanics" even though they commit homicide at a rate 8
times higher than Whites. With that in mind, the following is the racial composition of offender and victim for homicide

Per Year

Black on Black 7,361

Black on Black Youth 3,650

Black on White 1,221
Black on Other 15
Other on Black 5
Other on White 54
Other on Other 56
White on White 6,661
White on Black 541
White on Other 51

Per Day

Black on Black 20

Black on Black Youth 10
Black on White 3
Black on Other 0.04
Other on Black 0.01
Other on White 0.15
Other on Other 0.15
White on White 18.2
White on Black 1.5
White on Other 0.14

Per Year Counting Hispanics

Black on Black 7,361

Black on Black Youth 3,650

Black on Hispanic 1,068
Black on White 153
Black on Other 15
Other on Black 5
Other on White 54
Other on Other 56

Hispanic on Hispanic 5,828
White on White 833

Hispanic on Black 473
White on Black 68

Hispanic on Other 45
White on Other 6

Police on All 91

Police on Black 11

Per Day Counting Hispanics

Black on Black 20

Black on Black Youth 10

Black on Hispanic 3
Black on White 0.4
Black on Other 0.04
Other on Black 0.01
Other on White 0.1
Other on Other 0.1

Hispanic on Hispanic 16
White on White 2.3

Hispanic on Black 1.3
White on Black 0.2

Hispanic on Other 0.1
White on Other 0.02

Police on All 0.2

Police on Black 0.03

We should add that according to the Word of God, as well as to most state
laws until very recently, most "Hispanics", because they have more Black blood
than Spanish blood (who themselves already had Black blood), are considered
"Black".

Not too long ago, George Zimmerman would have been considered "Black", so his
"crime" was just yet one more Black on Black crime.

So the 16 murders PER DAY committed by Hispanics are in reality Black on
Black crimes [at least in the Eye of our God, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and
Jacob].

To be fair, we should note that only 93% of the Hispanics in Santa Ana are
Mexicans, or 242,702 of them, and if they commit murder at the same rate as
their brethren (21 murders per 100k),then Mexicans are responsible for "only" 51
of the murders there, which is exactly how many murders there are each year in
Santa Ana. The other Hispanics are Cubans, Puerto Ricans, Central
American, and South Americans, most of whom do have SIGNIFICANTLY lower murder
rates than Mexico (e.g., Cuba at 4.2 vs. Mexico at 21).

Anaheim = 158,729 Hispanics
at 21 murder per 100k = 33 murders per year
Blacks = 8,395 x 80 per 100k = 8
Total murders per year = 41
Actual 37 per year

Parkland, Florida
Hispanics = 4,995
Blacks - 1,749
Mexico = 21 murders per 100k
Blacks = 80 murders per 100k
Hispanics = 1.05 murder per year, or 10 over the last decade
Blacks = 1.3 murders per year, or 13 over the last decade
Over the last decade, up until this week, there had only been 1 murder, and this
school shooting brings it up to 18.

Many people on the news are proclaiming that the reason they moved to Parkland
was how "safe" it appeared. Well, if they uses that as a criteria, then they
ought to move to non-multicultural areas like Newport Beach, or North Dakota, or
Singapore, or the Republic of Ireland where the murder rate is 0.2 per 100k.

Law Enforcement Officers per 100k

Terrorists

Of the nine people I know who were killed by Muslims, plus the daughter of my
racquetball partner who I never met, who have been killed by Muslims, not a
single one was identified by ANY news agency, much less the MSM, much less CNN,
as a "terrorist" event.

If this is true across the nation, then the number of people killed in ACTUAL
terrorist attacks by "radical Muslims" [though I repeat myself] is MUCH bigger
than the official number.

FBI Uniform Crime Report

We like to think of NYC as a populous city, but at 2,050
people per square km, it actually ranks 114th in the world. Cities like Mumbai,
Kolkata, Karachi, Lagos, Shenzhen, Seoul, and Taipei are ten times as densely
populated, and cities like Singapore, Mexico City, Cairo, St. Petersburg
(Russia), Santiago, and Istanbul are four times as populated.

For mentally ill liberals who like to claim that our high crime rates are caused
by our densely populated cities rather than our Blacks, remember that NYC also
has a murder rate 28 times higher than Singapore and 9 times higher than Cairo
[at the height of Arab Spring]--AND that a woman is FIVE TIMES more likely to be
raped there than in Singapore.

For mentally ill liberals who like to think that the solution to our ever
increasing crime rates is an ever increasing police force, please don't forget
that we already have 64 TIMES as many police per capita as Singapore (244 vs.
3.8 per 100,000 population), 271 TIMES as many as Switzerland, Netherlands,
South Korea, and Sri Lanka (244 vs. 0.9), and 2,430 TIMES more than Poland,
Spain, New Zealand, and Morocco (243 vs. 0.1).

In 2010, compared to a resident of Newport Beach, a resident
of Washington, DC, was:

1) Two hundred more likely to be murdered (21.9 per 100,000
population, vs. 0.11)

2) Six times more likely to be raped (30.6 vs. 4.9).

3) Thirteen times more likely to be robbed (650.6 vs. 51.3).

4) Six times more likely to be assaulted (538.1 vs. 86.7).

5) 35% more likely to be burgled (702 vs. 519).

6) 52% more likely to be a victim of theft (2,999.7 vs.
1,974).

7) Five times more likely to have his car stolen (806.3 vs.
163.7).

Compared to a resident in neighboring city Santa Ana which has
been taken over by Mexicans (and now looks like Tijuana used to look before us
WHITES cleaned up Tijuana), was:

1) 86 times more likely to be murdered (10.0 per 100,000 population, vs. 0.11)
2) Five times more likely to be raped (26 vs. 4.9).
3) Five times more likely to be robbed (256 vs. 51.3).
4) Three times as likely to be assaulted (323 vs. 86.7).
5) 35% more likely to be burgled (702 vs. 519).
6) Almost twice as likely to be a victim of theft (2,999.7 vs. 1,974).
7) Five times more likely to have his car stolen (142 vs. 1,038).
8) Four times as likely to be a victim of arson (10 vs. 40)

And Newport Beach is not the safest city in California.
We rank 27th, which means there are 26 other mostly White cities which are even
safer than us.

What's wrong with America that so many children are now in
prison and so many women CRIMINALS are not?

A recent CNN documentary from "Crimes of the Century" provides some insight into
these well documented statistics. A mother tried to convince her daughter to
assassinate her step-father for the SOLE purpose of gaining control of his half
a million dollar stock portfolio. Her daughter agreed, and solicited the help of
CHILDREN, mere BOYS, to carry it out. When these two boys got a guilty
conscience about their possible role in this murder, they argued amongst the
three of them, and ended up killing the daughter who originally solicited them
for murder.

These two boys are HEROS. They prevented the murder of the step-father, punished
the REAL perpetrator of murder by murdering her, AND removed the mother from
this position of power, without whom this would never have happened.

Did the mother go to prison?

NO.

Did the two boys go to prison?

YES.

IS THIS .UCKING STUPID?

This woman is THE DEVIL. For society to support her in
ANY WAY is to support THE DEVIL.

For this putative Christian nation to get Right With God, she
must be EXECUTED, and the boys must be released WITH FULL HONORS for their role
in preventing the step-father's murder.

> From: Christian Party, tcffc2000@yahoo.com
>
> >However, since you raised the question, it's curious that you didn't even
> >mention that your own reference shows that Qatar's crime rate in 1994 was
> >half what it was in 1980. This suggests that they (like many other Muslim
> >countries) have their crime problems under control, particularly since
> Turkey's increased 275% and Malaysia's 185% from 1990 to 1997. :P
>
> >69% decrease, and which was 1/30th of ours. Must be a lot of boring
> >Muslims there, too, eh?
> With the exception of India, /yes/, from the lack of positive news about
> those countries, they are boring.

If "lack of positive news about" about a country is an indication of how
boring it is, then two thirds of the world thinks the US is the most boring
place in the world. Not only do most of them know little to nothing about
us, but the little bit they do hear is the worst news they've heard in
years.

Only American "liberals" and feminists with puffy little chests think of us
as "the world's last superpower" or "the world's policeman".
Most of the
people in the rest of the world thinks of us as either "the great satan" or
a lost country without a definitive foreign policy.

Declaring war on Osama bin Ladin didn't help that image at all.

>
> >Did you notice any Muslim nations whose crime rates come even close to
> >ours? No. Do you wonder at all why we, the great satan, have a crime
> Maybe you'd like to convert everyone to Islam then. Or move to Italy.
>

No. Why can't you comprehend the point, as it's been stated over and over
and over? Our problems with high rates of crime, incarceration, and social
pathology didn't start until after we let jews become judges, lawyers, and
other public servants. Before that, we had lower overall crime rates than
some Muslim nations.

But now that we have some of the worst social and economic indicators in the
world, it's ludicrous for John Ashcroft to be insulting Muslim nations as if
though we can give them some sort of good moral advice.

The best advice we could give them is to avoid jews and feminism like the
plague--except that they already know that, in spades.

> >This has got to be a classic. Is this why feminists are in favor of our
> >"war on terror"? We need to stomp on boring countries so that
they'll
> How would you know what they think?

Discussions like this prove that feminist don't, can't, and never will be
able to "think". All they ever do is repeat the jewish mantra they've
heard
50 times over each day in the jewsmedia, and then pretend that they know
something new.

>
> >When the rate at which niggers kill my fellow White Christian Americans
is
> >higher than the entire murder rate in many other civilized countries, and
> >when the "news" refuses to even report on it and instead talks
endlessly
> >about James Byrd, then yes, both of us live in crime zones.
> never heard of him
> I'm never affected by crime, and neither is my part of town, so no. I
> also live two blocks from an elementary school. Do you actually fear for
> your life? If not, stop complaining. If so, you may be constantly
> putting out a reason.

Of course this is a classic example of how "intelligent" feminists are.

The reason for being concerned about a ten fold increase in the murder,
violent crime, rape, and other crime rates is that if the trend continues,
then you WILL with 100% certainty be a victim of a serious crime, and then
it will be too, too late for you to do anything about it.

As it stands right now, all of our crime rates WILL increase even faster
than they did in the last half a century because the factors that caused
them in the first place have recently gotten far worse.

>
> >er, to be precise, something that feminist don't seem to comprehend,
> Stop saying feminist, hypocrite.
> >Turkey's rate in 1990 was 189, which was 1/30th of ours, at 5,803.
> >There's no data on this chart that shows our rate to be only ten times
> >higher than Turkey's, and in 1994 our rate was 15 times higher.
> >
> >Where do you get this "1/10th - 1/14th of ours"?
> It's stupid to compare crime rates for different countries for the same
> year if you're evaluating both over a period of time. You need to
> understand that you're not good with charts. Notice how US's rate rises
> and falls over a period of about five years? (Maybe you can tell me
> why.)

Not that you'd remember, or understand, but let's try it anyway. Our major
crime rates decreased lately for only one reason--the age group which
commits the most crime (age 16-24) is at an all time record low because of a
vaccuum in the birth rate 16-24 years ago. When it cycles back the other
way, which it always does, the increase in the crime rate will be more
dramatic than it's ever been. Not only have the underlying problems not
been addressed and are thus continuing to accelerate, but it's expected that
this age group will be larger than ever, and that age group will consist of
a higher percentage of blacks than ever.

How serious is the problem? Even with a million blacks in prison, American
black men in that age group still commit murder at a rate 175 times higher
than White women, and STILL a third of them are never brought to justice.
iow, it's impossible to imprison them fast enough to slow down the
accelerating murder rate, but the justice system isn't even addressing the
problem in the first place. If the trend continues, over the next 40 years,
7% of American blacks will have murdered somebody--and they already murder 7
Whites per day.

Ignore the problem at your own peril.

> Take the average per cycle and you get about 5510. Because
> Turkey's rate isn't cycling, take its highest value and you get a ratio
> of 1/10.6. Or, upon the chance that it's falling again, take its average
> which is 340.1. Then the ratio is 1/16.2. I'm assuming that Turkey's
> rate continues to increase.
>
> >Aren't you sooooo proud?
> No, I just don't care.

No. You just don't understand. And you CAN'T understand. You just proved
it.

>
> >It's hard to imagine that you missed all the url's to those sources,
which
> >means that it's likely that you're just acting like the typical feminist
> >who shuts her ears when she's confronted with a fact that disputes her
> It's easier to imagine that you /still/ couldn't understand that I said
> none of the links give population and the source doesn't give rates per
> capita.
>
> -Aut