The point is that even from the early days of sci-fi, like Dan Dare and the Treens, we have been conditioned to believe that any Aliens would be basically bipeds, but with very different faces and heads. Mainly of course so that it makes it easier for human actors with masks to play parts in films.

As for our conditioning, I'd say that was intentional. Many films labeled as fiction actually happened - there is evidence that the stories behind 2001 (discovering alien artifacts) and Close Encounters are true and accurate.

Sounds like i'm talking complete rubbish, doesn't it? Well thats the way it worked out. When i do finally crack the code i will publish my results and everyone will know what i'm talking about. Until then, the world will just have to wait.

They were probably decoded long ago.

Disclosure isn't so much about coming clean - it's about people in government and academia covering their @sses and pretending they didn't know. In fact the very people who kept silent will now look like heros and whistle-blowers.

Even your stories are suspect in this manner... Are you sure you're telling us everything? Withholding information is worse than lying sometimes.

I've noticed the SETI astronomers use very cute wording.... "We'll let you know if we detect anything!"

Okay. How about telling us what you know about alien artifacts on Mars, historic UFO landings, and the biblical connections to all of this? Or better yet, state emphatically that you have never been briefed or heard credible rumors of anything like that.

They won't do it. They'll keep changing the subject to radio signals and explaining "how science works" etc. But they make no firm denials of knowing anything more about extraterrestrials.

I think they are just playing out a scenario,
what they might do IF a signal was detected,
how they might go about decoding it.

Donegal_TDI,
I'm currently in the middle of decoding ET signals. I have been at it for over 6 months now. I always thought that if mankind detected a signal from ET, the best scientists in the world would be put to work decoding it with all the resources they need.

But no, in the end it has turned out to be me who receives the signal. And to top that off, i haven't a clue how to decode it. So without any help from anyone, cos nobody would believe me if i told them, i have to go and learn how to decode the information by myself.

Sounds like i'm talking complete rubbish, doesn't it? Well thats the way it worked out. When i do finally crack the code i will publish my results and everyone will know what i'm talking about. Until then, the world will just have to wait.

John.

Would be interested to hear more.
I have a motorised satellite dish,
1.2m, in both vertical & horizontal axis.
Would love to play with a spectrum analyser on one of the feeds,
if I had the time, which I don't :)

Would be interested to hear more.
I have a motorised satellite dish,
1.2m, in both vertical & horizontal axis.
Would love to play with a spectrum analyser on one of the feeds,
if I had the time, which I don't :)

What frequency range can you pick up on that thing Ger? Anywhere near the 1420MHz range?

The thing is, i have a set of transmission/receiving frequencies. And i have rough coordinates in the sky. But for reasons i can't mention here in public, your 1.2 meter dish would be too small. If your serious Ger, we should chat about this through email - john37309 AT hotmail dot com
I have a physicist working on this with me. He's a guy who understands this stuff in detail.

I find this fascinating but skeptical. Ok so these messages were recieved on shortwave on the sputnik series of satillites. It doesnt say which and 190 plus in that series. Shortwave radio has been around a long time. Many strange signals are heard on shortwave many sourses unknown and contribute to noise. These were only recieved on shortwave and durning this time peroid shortwave radio was the norm. It wasnt picked up by sputnik 1 in 1957 I listened to that one on my dads shortwave radio in germany. Funny no one else has shared this finding. Maybe SETI is looking in the wrong frequency. I dont belive so. I dont have any idea how shortwave radation would be out maybe 50 lightyears and years ago shortwave could have alot of power to transmit with. There have been detectible planets out to 450 light years out.

I'm currently in the middle of decoding ET signals. I have been at it for over 6 months now. I always thought that if mankind detected a signal from ET, the best scientists in the world would be put to work decoding it with all the resources they need.

John, what are you using to decode these signals with. Do you have
a recording available in .wav file format?