"Why set aside money specifically for a conservative?" asks Curtis Bell, a teaching assistant in political science. "I'd rather see a quality academic than someone paid to have a particular perspective."...

[David] Horowitz fears that setting up a token right-winger as The Conservative at Boulder will brand the person as a curiosity, like "an animal in the zoo."...

33 comments:

one would think that any decent history of political philosophy course would meet the requirement. Alas, present day academia sucks. Rather than kill the lawyers, lets kill the professors (present company excepted) and start over. Cheaper than endowing chairs and facing lawsuits from the victims studies people.

I'm sceptical that this would even provide a spot for conservative thought on campus. Unless the endowment agreement gets very specific about the scholarship of the individual who will hold the chair, what's to keep a more liberal hiring committee from appointing someone who specializes in harsh critiques of conservative thinkers? Because of academic freedom concerns, there's a limit to how specific an endowment agreement of this sort can be.

No wait, that's very sad and shows how bad things have become. I want my money back! Oh, that's right, haven't given them any. Have I? If I have, I want it back! And I take back my laugh to infinity, this isn't funny atoll. *grumbles*

You couldn't make something like that up. New this fall on NBC, a hilarious sit-com, Red in Blue, hijinks and laughs as ultra conservative Dr. Red Kneck sets up shop in the Poltical Science Department at the University of Colorado. Starring Tim Robbins.

When I was in law school, we had three openly conservative professors, one who described himself as a "Rockefeller Republican" (which in law school meant that he was a far right wing nut), an openly closeted conservative adjunct and a few who we suspected were conservatives but simply were afraid to come out.

The scandal every year was that the Federalist Society was the only group to recognize MLK Day.

Several years back, the NYT discussed the possibility of exploring more "conservative" topics. They were similarly anthropological about it. Although they did not recommend shots before NASCAR races, like that Dem congresscritter did.

UC Boulder, UW Madison and UC Berkeley could have a run-off for most screaming radical leftist campus. The winner gets nuked. The losers slink off in shame, knowing forever they weren't radical enough.

"Why set aside money specifically for a conservative?" asks Curtis Bell, a teaching assistant in political science. "I'd rather see a quality academic than someone paid to have a particular perspective...."

This, from the school that "hired a phony Indian with a masters degree in graphic design from a third tier college to a fast-track tenured position in ethnic studies" (from Orson Buggeigh at volokh.com)

In fact, Mr. Peterson said it's not imperative that the new professor of conservative thought be an actual conservative.

"We hire lots of scholars of the French language," he says, "and they aren't necessarily French."

Umm, maybe so but I think hiring an impression of a conservative would give you the same authenticity and depth of experience as observing a paint by numbers Monet vs a real Monet. One is not even close the other is the real thing.

These so called educated people have got to have some of the dumbest ideas.

Umm, maybe so but I think hiring an impression of a conservative would give you the same authenticity and depth of experience as observing a paint by numbers Monet vs a real Monet. One is not even close the other is the real thing. These so called educated people have got to have some of the dumbest ideas.

If the university is hiring someone who is admittedly a non-conservative who is an expert on conservatism to have this position, that is not the same as observing a replica of an artwork versus the real thing. It is simply an example of hiring someone who is not part of a given group that is the subject of study who has expertise about that subject to be a professor on the topic of that subject. The analogy regarding non-French professors of French works. Yours fails.

It would seem odd for them to hire a non-conservative for this position, given that it would probably look bad for them to do so, unless the non-conservative they hired was someone like John Judis, Sam Tanenhaus or Rick Perlstein, and even then it would look like a "conservatives in the mist" experiment to a lot of people. The university (and conservatives in Colorado) would probably be better served by the university hiring a couple of more good business professors.

Umm, maybe so but I think hiring an impression of a conservative would give you the same authenticity and depth of experience as observing a paint by numbers Monet vs a real Monet. One is not even close the other is the real thing.

One of my professors claimed that the leading authority on English grammar was a Swedish linguist who could barely speak intelligible English.

Considering the pay scale for starting professors and the right's continual criticism of academia, is it any surprise that few conservatives enter the graduate programs necessary to become college professors?

IMO, it's not just that universities are so left-wing, it's that in large part, they are totally impractical; most instructors "instruct" with no eye whatsoever to helping their students pursue a career.

For the $$$ you pay for a college degree nowadays, that's inexcusable. But professors are individuals who have gone out of their way to avoid having to look for a job ever again, so there you go.

IMO, it's not just that universities are so left-wing, it's that in large part, they are totally impractical; most instructors "instruct" with no eye whatsoever to helping their students pursue a career.

What on earth are you talking about? Are you claiming that modern universities do not prepare engineering, computer science, geology, marketing, accounting, or business majors for careers in their chosen fields? Or do you expect English, Philosophy and History instructors to prepare students for a cubicle job on Wall Street? If so, you have a warped concept of education.

Back in the 80s, conservatives supported a flock of campus newspapers in order to get their viewpoints expressed on campus. They were weeklies or monthlies as opposed to the established dailies or weeklies. And they all were named "[School Name Here] Review". So, given this desire for conservatives' views on campus, why would conservatives not welcome professors of Conservative Studies?

Implicit in this proposal isn't so much that conservatives are in need of affirmative action in the academy, but that conservatism is so alien to "normal" discourse that it is worthy of separation and study, much like cancerous cells, excised and examined under a microscope, separate from healthy cells.

If this catches on, this gives liberals the unique opportunity to "define the enemy". Much like atheists who love rail about how Christians should "really behave" liberal professors will get to be idealogical gatekeepers of not just their own liberalism but conservatism as well. Doesn't that sound ducky?

Or do you expect English, Philosophy and History instructors to prepare students for a cubicle job on Wall Street? If so, you have a warped concept of education.

Well, you're throwing out some extreme examples, there. I got an English degree the first time around; I certainly didn't expect to end up on Wall Street, but I sure as hell believed it would be more useful than it turned out to be. I think the English dept. should have required of me at least a year of "practical" English, such as technical or creative writing. Instead, I left college utterly clueless about lots of cool jobs I could have pursued. I wish I had known then about creative writing in advertising, or even editing and/or proofreading.

Perhaps you were more worldly at 18-21 than I was! But I think it's utterly irresponsible for universities to graduate students with an "education" that leaves them with no idea of either their earning potential or job satisfaction.