A public diary on themes around my books

August 31, 2005

Could the labels actually be right?

Although it's
tempting to assume that the evil record labels are once again trying to
gouge us, there's some sense in their latest efforts to get Apple to
abandon it's one-size-fits-all pricing model. A New York Times article
over the weekend reported on the ongoing struggle between the labels and
Apple over its fixed $0.99 price point. The labels would like to sell most
new music for more--$1.49/track?-- while older or more obscure tracks could
go for less.

There's plenty to like about variable pricing. For starters, it's almost
always the most efficient way to maximize markets of disparate goods
and customers. As Barry Ritholtz puts it:

It's a basic rule of economics: goods that have elastic demand (i..e,
non essential) are highly price sensitive. Further, any item easily
available for free (albeit illegally) will have an even bigger response
to price increases.

Apple
has argued that single-price simplicity was necessary in the early days
of the service, when people were just getting used to paying to
download music. But now, after 500m tracks have been sold, we're clearly past the early adopter phase. So what's the right pricing model going forward?

Most accounts of the dispute between Apple and the labels have
focused on the industry's efforts to raise prices, which are undeniably
a big part of their plan. No surprise there. The research we've
been doing for the book shows that within the bulk of the online music
business--the top 100,000 downloads--only 3.5 tracks on the average CD
sell. So the record labels are getting less than $3 in
revenue (wholesale) from albums when the music is sold by the track.
That's less than half the wholesale price of a CD (although with none
of the physical costs of making and distributing a CD). The shift from
an album model to a track model is indeed an alarming thing for the labels, and
it's easy to see why they'd want to raise retail prices online as a
result.

But there's more to the story that that. The labels may be evil, but
they're not (all) stupid. They--to say nothing of
many of their artists--also see the virtues of dropping the price for
lots of their music, too.
For decades they've been playing with CD pricing models that range from
cut-price classics to top-dollar boxed sets, and when freed of the
overheads of traditional retail, they're likely to experiment more, not
less. Although some of the more vocal commentators have encouraged
Apple to
hold the line at $0.99, there's a strong argument that introducing
variable pricing might ultimately lead to a more consumer-friendly outcome.

The reason is simple Long Tail math: there's a lot more music in the
Tail
than there is in the Head, and labels are generally more willing to
experiment with discount pricing outside of the top 1,000 than they are
with their hits. Those niches represents most of the music available
today, measured by number of titles, and because they're only modest
sellers individually they're less likely to create channel conflict
with CD retailers, who tend to only stock the hits.

Imagine, for starters, that Apple introduces a three-tiered band of
pricing: $1.49, $.99 and $.79 (that would no doubt soon expand to include
$.49, but below that the transaction costs of credit card processing
and the like start to loom large). Tiered pricing--gold,
silver, bronze--is still pretty simple for consumers to understand, yet
it introduces
a valuable new dimension of demand creation.

Rhapsody, for instance, saw demand triple last year when it cut
prices in half, to $0.49. And the average usage per customer in the
all-you-can-eat subscription services is typically 5-10 times that of
the pay-per-download music stores, such as iTunes. Add to that the
potential of free music, which Apple has already paved the way for with
its podcast service and could easily be extended to music licensed
under Creative Commons, and you could grow grow the user base of the commercial music services manyfold.

Once iTunes allowed variable pricing, I imagine labels would do
pretty much what they already do with CDs: set a range of wholesale
prices depending on age, popularity and target market. Some labels will
unwisely try to jack up all their prices and will eventually suffer lower overall revenues as a result. But smarter labels will
experiment with all sorts of pricing variations, from lower prices for
bands they're trying to break to volume discounts for packages of older
music, and even higher prices for special reissues and
repackaging for hard-core fans. That's already what they do in the CD
world, where even standard retail prices range from around $9 to $18.

Apple may think it's protecting us from record label avarice with
$0.99, which may be true in the short term. But long term,
one-size-fits-all pricing is just constraining the economics of the
industry and holding back the market. If Apple introduced
variable pricing, it's not hard to see how the average price might actually
fall in a year or two, thanks to the number of titles in the discounted
niche/backcatalog categories vastly outnumbering the more expensive hits.

As long as prices can go down as
well as up, I'm confident that market forces will eventually reveal the
right set of models. And I'm even more sure they will confirm that no one model is right for
everyone and every song.

TrackBack

» 99-Cent Store from theQview
The New York Times reported on a potential change in pricing structure at the iTunes Music Store and the rhetoric in defense of Apple went into high gear. Barry Ritholtz in defense of the status quo argues:Its a basic rule [Read More]

» Prices for songs? Above a buck? Below? from project opus
It seems all I do is comment on Chris Anderson posts. His latest post postulates that Major Labels may have it right on variable pricing for songs rather than the 1 price fits all.
The labels would like to sell most new music for more--$1.49/track?-- whi [Read More]

Tracked on September 08, 2005 at 02:31 AM

» Variable Pricing for iTunes? from IPcentral Weblog
Long-Tailed Wired editor Chris Anderson has interesting thoughts on recent reports that the music industry is pressuring Apple to adopt variable pricing for iTunes: Although it's tempting to assume that the evil record labels are once again trying to g... [Read More]

Tracked on September 08, 2005 at 10:20 AM

» When is a Long Tail not really a Long Tail? from the penguin ponders
Chris Andersons worthy Long Tail book-in-progress recently weighed in on the Appl vs. Music Industry pricing debate:
Could the labels actually be right?.
As some commentators replied, well no. Not in the real world. In a world where the music ... [Read More]

Comments

Back in the time when I was an executive in BMG in the early '90's (and prior to that, when I ran a publishing company) I became more and more amazed at the rationale in record companies for pricing.

The problem that I see with record companies setting multiple prices - for both them and for artists and for Apple, and others - is that they will still get it wrong.

The model then (and now) is that the top selling artists are discounted aggressively in order to establish sell in and sell through. New and emerging artists were sold at the full price. Catalogue was sold at a discount.

So the back catalogue that had the capacity to produce the most margin with the least marketing had its margin cut in order to discount and create volume sales - so creating margin leakage in order to deliver revenues fast. The products that needed the most discounting in order to create buy in were sold at the highest price. And the hits that had already at that time become more marketing driven than talent driven had the highest amount of marketing expenditure, the lowest margin, because of enormously increased royalty agreements with artists and the least likely opportunity to become classics....

I don't see the record companies being able to get their heads around the concept that they probably would be better off totally closing down all physical goods sales, which would enable them to get rid of a whole raft of operating costs, and make a commitment to electronic distribution only. They need to move totally to the publishing model where there is no manufacturing and distribution. Instead there is licensing and content acquisition. This requires a significant culture shift. They have got it with ring tones and ring back tones now, but it remains to be seen whether they can really deal with the sort of counterintuitive reasoning that is required in the new century.

By the way please feel free to visit my blog too - its at www.perceptric.com

I'm not against variable pricing -- I simply believe that the Labels have priced music too high relative to their entertainment competition.

Too often, I find the CD soundtrack of a film costs more than the Film DVD itself. Which polycarbonate disc does the consumer than buy -- the 45 minute audio disc, or the 2 plus hour audio/video/out takes/ interview version?

Both Variable and Dynamic pricing makes sense -- but the industry needs to recognize the value proposition music has relative to other forms of entertainment.

Does it make sense to price digital downloads -- with no physical cost to press, ship or warehouse -- the same as CDs?

See these two discussions for more details:
Dynamic Pricing: DVD versus CD Strategies
http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2005/03/dynamic_pricing.html

"The Labels" that set the pace are four multinationals that have had no qualms about engaging in price-fixing in the past. I somehow sense that the average price of tracks would rise if the labels took control of pricing. This could harm the viability of online music in general. I think that Apple would be wise to retain control of pricing.

Interesting insight above from Chris as to how labels think about their pricing structure. Seems like the corporations that own the big music labels are, in fact, pretty dumb, since they seem to neither know or care much about music, or about their customers. For them music is just another commodity, like pork bellies. At least Apple has an understanding of their customer base, and they seem to actually care somewhat about the music. In spite of Long Tail economics, I think Apple has it right. The only thing the labels can be trusted to do is to screw things up.

"$.49, but below that the transaction cost of credit card processing and the like start to loom large" This is easily solved by buying credits. Then you have a single $25 transaction bearing credit card costs followed by 100 (!) single track transactions.

Which brings to mind a business plan that I and others have suggested before, based on what AllOfMp3 are doing.

1) Digitise everything you can get your hands on using a lossless codec. That's the entire back catalogue. Anything and everything that's still on tape (or other format) somewhere in the archives. In your terms, service the long tail.

2) Setup a search and distribution site that converts on the fly from the lossless archive format to the customer's choice of codec and bitrate with no DRM.

3) Charge on the basis of bandwidth used because that's your biggest variable cost. Set the pricing as follows for a typical 192Kbps VBR MP3 of a 3 minute track.
- $0.50 for the first 3 months after release.
- $0.25 for the next 9 months.
- $0.10 thereafter.
Or to put it another way, $10 for a 10 track album in lossless format. ie, the same price as a CD for the same product except that you didn't have to absorb any shipping or distributor costs.

The net results are:-
1) Take advantage of the "must own the latest track now" imperative to charge higher prices.
2) Blow file sharing out of the water because it's just plain easier to spend $0.10 for a properly encoded, named, tagged track than to get the same for free.
3) Make it all back up on volume. (So, 1999!) You want to bet the volume wouldn't be at least a factor of 10 bigger than iTMS, perhaps even a factor of 100?

I think the record companies are beginning to change. If anyone caught wind of the Aspen Summit recently, there was a couple of big speeches on DRM. Given that this blog has been discussing DRM consequences a lot lately, it would be good to mention there is finally some forward thinking by content producers with regards to DRM and piracy.

Nice observation Chris, but I looked at this from another Long Tail perspective. With other music download sites, podcasts, streaming sites and music publishing technology sprouting up, the online music distribution industry is positioning itself into a long tail formation.
Apple is at the head because of its pioneer status, the others form the tail.
I think Apple is trying to consolidate itself at the head, because it can afford to be a price setter because it is the biggest buyer of music and in essence, can dictate how much its rivals pay for music.
The way I see it, i-tunes is a hegemony that could fall apart if the longtail has its way. It needs the price to remain constant without being undercut by the rest. Its a case of the head in danger of being swallowed by the tail.

Another avenue towards a similar destination would be by 'bundling' a few tracks together if you were going to charge more for them. This is actually closer to a 'digital' single than the 99c download. I've got some B-sides from CD singles that I'm pretty fond of! The record company can charge $2.49 by bundling the 'hit' with a b-side/remix that probably wouldn't sell much on its own.

Essentially this is a way to address the problem that will come from big price rises - raising the price, without raising the value proposition AT ALL.

A next logical step for iTunes, would be to have downloadable .mov files of music videos. Perhaps a bundle of the music video and mp3 could warrant more premium pricing and delivering that important increase in customer value.

Here is an additional thought/observation about labels and distribution we have been discussing at perceptric ... not sure whether it is long tail or not... I was reading on the BBC site and blogged about this too - 21 year old Chinese woman, records song on her laptop, edits it on same laptop, posts song to free download distribution site in China, receives 1 Billion downloads - gets signed to a label, sells 800,000 CD's.... Her name is Xiang Xiang.

This is what the labels should be watching. Maybe this is a reverse long tail. Get all those freebies in the marketplace, then sell stuff.

I do hear that some of the labels are considering quite actively DRM based downloads to your computer - they have finally woken up to the fact that there is cost to manufacturing and distribution that they can move out of their cost structure and on to the consumer.

But now, after 500m tracks have been sold, we're clearly past the early adopter phase.

There's your syllogism. We're nowhere near past the early adopter phase. There's 10 million accounts (that's from a population with access to Itunes Music Store of what, a billion?) who've bought on average 50 tracks each. Most iPods don't contain bought music - it's peoples' own music.

Ergo, online music buying is not past the early adopter, and isn't yet mature enough for variable pricing.

Inventory Source is dedicated to not only helping its members find trusted wholesale product sources, but we also want to provide them with new opportunities for places where they can promote or sell their products

who can shop your inventory 24x7. BullDig.com also allows you to connect to hundreds of other vendors, swap ideas, see other vendors' inventories and develop synergies - it's all possible with the BullDig.com online inventory search.

Strategic management is a great program to evaluate business health, develop and deploy improvement programs. We provides services to help you with the design, implementation, and monitoring of efforts for assisting small businesses

Trade secrets generally protect confidential information. Trade secrets vary from state to state. Most states have adopted the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA). Only Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, North Carolina, and Texas have not adopted the UTSA. For more information call 201-962-3570.

Discover Original Art is a virtual gallery that showcases original art from select artists. We provide a platform to art collectors so that they may discover exquisite beauty from our collection of artworks and choose some of the finest and most exciting original art.

Looking for an awesome vacation? We offer tremendous places for vacations and other activities. We specialize in dinner shows like Arabian nights with some of the most exquisite horsemanship which will make your night most memorable

Well, nice article buddy… Someone will love to read this infor if I tell her about this. For those of you thinking that if they implement this it will eliminate some of the waiting and lines… meme estetiğiyüz estetiğiburun estetiği

Thank you very successful and useful site I have received the necessary information. I'm really very useful to follow a long-time see this as a blog here Thank you for your valuable informationsmartlipolazerlipolizsaç ekimi

FREE was available in all digital forms--ebook, web book, and audiobook--for free shortly after the hardcover was published on July 7th. The ebook and web book were free for a limited time and limited to certain geographic regions as determined by each national publisher; the unabridged MP3 audiobook (get zip file here) will remain free forever, available in all regions.