Wall of contention or a wall of protection?

Democrats calls it “Trump’s Wall” in order to confuse the American people because they know that there is no such thing as Trump’s Wall because the reality is that President Trump is fighting for America’s Wall as it is a wall that is going to protect the American people. It is a wall to keep criminals and enemies of democracy out and freedom in the United States of America.
We agree and support President Trump’s passion to fight for the wall that can keep those who are not supposed to be here on their own because of the lack of paperwork and the lack of legality regarding their entrance into the country.
Unlike former president Barack Obama, President Donald Trump does not need the wall to protect himself and his family; for a very long time in his private life real estate mogul Donald Trump and his family have had their own security force, and their own bodyguards for the entire family’s protection. President Trump is now protected, as any other president in the past has been, by the right to use the government services and the protection of the United States Secret Service force, so he does not have to be concerned about the wall as a way to protect himself and his family; he leaves that concern to his predecessor
Barack Obama and his ten-foot-high wall with a chain-link fence on his eight million dollar mansion just a few blocks from the White House.
What we do not agree with is the government shutdown of those offices that could hurt or greatly inconvenience the government workers in low level classifications, and the public, the citizens of this great nation. We would’ve seen a more positive result if the President had closed the entire government; or there could have been a more productive and efficient shutdown by cutting the salaries of the Senate and House of Representatives, and those working in the capitol, along with all the appointed secretaries.
Perhaps it may not be of much moment taking into consideration that almost everyone in those elected positions and the appointed cabinet members has become a millionaire during their time of “giving back to the country” and “serving their constituents” for the last three, four or five decades, but at least those who work paycheck-to-paycheck would be able to pay their mortgage, cover their utility bills, and buy groceries.
“It has nothing to do with politics. It has to do with a wall [being] an immorality between countries. It’s an old way of thinking. It isn’t cost effective,” says the newly elected Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
“When they say the wall is immoral, well then you better — got to do something about the Vatican, because the Vatican has the biggest wall of them all,” Trump said at a Cabinet meeting earlier last week at the White House Speaker Pelosi says that “a wall in our borders is not who we are,” so we ask, who are we? The only country with no wall where everyone can walk in and take advantage of our generosity? Is that what we want for the honest, hard working American people? Do we want to put the safety of our children at risk with diseases spread to all levels of the nation? Do we want our future generations to become a generation of dopeheads?
American people should tell Speaker Nancy Pelosi, her comrade Chuck Schumer, and all those socialist Democrats to stop trying to make the United States of America into another Cuba or Venezuela.
It is a wonder how many of those communist mentalities in the American Senate and the House of Representative have lived in a communist country, how many of them have suffered the tentacles of a communist regime; but more important, how many of those political junkies and regular people who believe and blindly follow them that American political so-called leaders have their best interest at heart have experienced the pressure of a communist government, regime and lifestyle.
There has never been so much disrespect for the office of the presidency as can now be seen; if we cannot respect the presidential office, if we cannot respect the president that was elected by the people of this country and show that much respect for the majority’s choice, then there is a problem in our system where it becomes “my way or the highway,” “my way or no way,” and we might as well just abolish the election process.
The American people should and must demand that the elected officials on both sides of the aisle maintain the sovereignty that has made this nation the greatest nation that it is, a nation that everyone wants to live in. God Bless America without communism.

City Council votes an abeyance of ordinance to jail developers
By Alexandra Cohen
De Oro Media Group
Las Vegas Tribune Exclusive
Tuesday the Las Vegas City Council Recommending Committee voted for an
abeyance on the controversial ordinance — Bill No. 2018-24 — sponsored
by City Councilman Steve Seroka, a councilman who is being sued in
Federal Court by developer Yohan Lowie for bias. This abeyance now
moves the bill to the September 4, 2018 Recommending Committee, then
to be heard by the full City Council on September 6.
The proposed bill will severally penalize developers with excessive
fines and jail time for not abiding by new standards. The bill is
opposed by the Commercial Real Estate Development Association (NAIOP),
The Latin Chamber of Commerce and Laborers Local 872, along with
others in the building and trades community. The bill NO.2018-24, also
known as the «Yohan Lowie bill,” is an ordinance to amend LVMC Title
19 (The Unified Development Code) to adopt additional standards and
requirements regarding the repurposing of certain golf courses and
open spaces.
The ordinance was met with strong position from those speaking at
today’s meeting. Tommy White, Secretary Treasurer of the Laborers
Local 872 said “this City Council is sending the wrong message to not
only the local building community, but to the entire nation. This is
simply government overreach.” Mr. White vowed to bring 600 of his
union members to the next meeting to protest the flawed ordinance.
Peter Guzman, President of the Latin Chamber of Commerce, stated, “I
have received numerous calls from my members opposed to this
ordinance. This ordinance is contrary to our group’s philology and
focus of promoting commerce and growth in our community.” Todd Davis,
General Council, EHB Companies pointed out to the Recommending
Committee that “the Agenda states ‘NO FISCAL IMPACT,’ when clearly
there is a fiscal impact to taxpayers ranging from substantial legal
fees to defend the ordinance, to hundreds of millions of dollars if
the ordinance is found to be a taking.”
Councilwoman Michele Fiore publically and vehemently objected to the
ordinance in the July 18 council meeting and at times verbally sparred
with the bill sponsor, Councilman Seroka, citing that the ordinance
started as a 5-page ordinance and FAILED in the Las Vegas Planning
Commission by a 5 to 1 vote. Now, behind the scenes, it has been
expanded to a 13-page document and is being considered for approval.
Developer Yohan Lowie, stated, “this is typical of the corruption and
disingenuous acts of certain members of the city of Las Vegas who have
demonstrated for the past three years, and one of the reasons why I am
in litigation with Councilman Seroka and Bob Coffin for the animus
they continue to display. They are enacting a law to create criminal
penalties for the property no longer being a golf course and no longer
being green. All property owners should be concerned.” This bill may
be as far-reaching as to affect individual homeowners living in a golf
course community.
SECTION 7 in the bill states: Whenever in this ordinance any act is
prohibited or is made or declared to be unlawful... the doing of such
prohibited act or the failure to do any such required act shall
constitute a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof, shall be
punished by a fine of not more than $1,000.00 or by imprisonment for a
term of not more than six months.
Mr. Lowie has hired famed criminal defense lawyer David Chesnoff to
represent his interests in possible forthcoming criminal offenses that
may arise from this bill. Additionally, along with attorney and Lt.
Governor Mark Hutchison the City has been put on notice through a
letter, which states the City will be in violation of the EX Post
Facto Clause and Equal Protection Clause and a Taking by Eminent
Domain.
After the July 18 city council meeting, developer Yohan Lowie stated,
“If they want to put me in jail, they can. I will fight to my last
breath to prevent the City from EVER taking my property away. I will
continue to fight this matter all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court to
get justice.”