I didn't know that they allowed computers in mental hospitals, but after reading the last two posts I now see that they do !

The National Institutes of Health has just released the results of a $200 million research study completed under a grant to Johns Hopkins.The new study has found that women who carry a little extra weight live longer than the men who mention it.

It's amazing to see the responses generated by a statement wondering when WI wolves will take an interest in chasing people.

Mystic, The loss of a human life isn't a concern if it's a random act by an animal? Strange justification there.

Howaboutit wrote:C'mon mystic... you make tooo much sense.. I mean.. these far side forums are mostly populated by the under achiever for rational thought. GUN in the woods at all times.. don't we all? I mean...one might have to make sound shots.. who cares what they kill.. just so long as it is DEAD.

The average non thinker needs something to hate.. wolves are now the hot choice. AND as everyone knows.. wolves are responsible for everything wrong with the tall mice population...........

A feeble attempt at sarcasm here or an autobiographical account (Underachiever for rational thought)? By the way, I made no mention about being concerned about the effect of wolves on the deer herd.

Does anyone want to waste their time explaining what a Yooper is or shall we just leave this fool in the dark and let him stay ignorant ?

Perhaps the next time he comes hunting or fishing someone will enlighten him

Kerry, is this one of those cases where it is time to lose this screwball ?

The National Institutes of Health has just released the results of a $200 million research study completed under a grant to Johns Hopkins.The new study has found that women who carry a little extra weight live longer than the men who mention it.

Howaboutit, Why do you participate on this site? If we are all rubes to you and you are much our superior, then why would you want to communicate with us? You figure we're all old farts and brain dead. If all our hometown newspaper is to you is puppy training paper or bird cage liner then don't read it, or don't even think of it. An intelligent and important person like you shouldn't waste your time. You do like our hunting and fishing though. By the way, if you're looking for Yoopers you're in the wrong State. See, you're not as smart as you think you is. How are my grammer. A guy like you could let me know.

Look back to others that have posted statements like these in the past. Debating with them or pointing out they are wasting their time does nothing but encourage them. Other forums call someone like this a "troll" and they feed off your reactions.

Simply ignore their posts and move on, you'll live a happier life in the long run...

Don't be so absolute in the belief that a wolf has never attacked a human. By saying it must be documented to a 21st century scientific standard you are then dismissing ALL historical accounts of wolf attacks. This is an arrogant and dangerous stand to take. Check http://www.aws.vcn.com/wolf_attacks_on_humans.html

Dogs kill about 25-30 people in the U.S. each year and this seems to be increasing. Wolves kill zero people in a year. So if Wolves can kill off some of the dog population they may be saving lives. The use of dogs to pursue, tramautize, and kill other animals (ethical implicationas aside) is very disruptive to regular hunters, woodland users, and wildlife populations. It is a sadistic, ativistic activity.

Nimble wrote:Dogs kill about 25-30 people in the U.S. each year and this seems to be increasing. Wolves kill zero people in a year. So if Wolves can kill off some of the dog population they may be saving lives. The use of dogs to pursue, tramautize, and kill other animals (ethical implicationas aside) is very disruptive to regular hunters, woodland users, and wildlife populations. It is a sadistic, ativistic activity.

Wow. That is absolutly the most inane thing I've ever read.

The only sadistic thing I get out of your rant is your acceptance of indescriminate, unchecked killing of domestic animals by an overpopulated wolf pack in our state. I have more sypathy for the farmer who loses his stock. I have more sympathy for the grandad and grandma on a sunday stroll who have see their beloved terrier get its body ripped into oblieration.

I'm a "regular hunter" and "woodland user", and and the use of dogs in hunting is not "disruptive" to me. Your extreemest views DO NOT represent me or my views. Nor do they represent even a minescule population of hunters. The use of dogs to persue game is not sadistic, it is a natural act, as much a part of our history and hearatige as the freedom of speach that allows you to type such utter nonsense.