Advertisements

To read more than 200 comments...

click on the title of any post, it is a link to a separate page that shows all the comments. Scroll down to the bottom of the comments until you see the words newer and newest next to the number of comments on the right, those words are links that will lead you to a new page of comments. :)

Friday, August 24, 2018

You know the alliterate actress who had the secret baby? Yeah, her. Apparently the father of the baby has visited the now, not a baby, several times in 2018. To my knowledge, those were the first visits ever.

Oooh Nutty I like that idea. Her family is very self aware if they don't realize how idiotic this is making them look so they really are dumb if they're pushing their own agenda.

Also I keep thinking it's odd that there are constant articles saying "Royal family in a tizzy over Markles" "Meghan devastated by father" from inside sources but the royals haven't done anything to stop it...It's probably all orchestrated for publicity.

How’s having her estranged family continuously bash her good publicity? How is causing problems within her new family good? It’s hella embarrassing. That family wants money and the royal family refuses to be extorted so they won’t pay up. Eventually they’ll go away

Unknown - I thought everyone realized during the 2016 presidential campaign that for celebrities any publicity is good publicity is the golden rule.

The Markle drama keeps the royals at the front page of every tabloid for free. Do you really believe that The Firm is so incompetent that they would have frequent "emergency meetings" about a situation and still be unable to resolve it?

I still believe it's entirely possible that the Markles are just that stupid (humanity is constantly finding new lows in that regard), I just find it odd that if the royals are that upset they haven't figured out a solution after months of this.

That being said I don't think this is about Meghan. I think it's January Jones. Meghan clearly doesn't have custody of the kid so how could the father visit? And it doesn't say former.

The Royal Family doesn't need publicity, except for the usual stale sort where they cut a ribbon on a new motorway or tour a rehabilitation center and shake hands with photogenic commoners.

The people who benefit from this type of publicity are the DM (thousands of comments every single day, even on stories about obscure Markle relatives, what an advertising bonanza!), the family if they're getting paid, and Meg herself, who is presumably trying to position herself for a celebrity career outside the royal family after they dump her.

It looks like she's in Canada at the moment and Harry's in Botswana. True love, dat.

True, it doesn't say former. But if if if it was true, the baby could've been given up for adoption. And if the father was a sleazy/user/opportunist, he sees Meghan all over the media and tracks down the child to cash in.

lol it wouldn't be surprising if the blind about Meghan getting extra cash by using her friend's clothing samples is true that she would be getting a cut (they always use very flattering photos of her like you mentioned!).

If she loses the marriage she definitely needs to have enough publicity and celebrity status to stay relevant on her own.

Also I could see the new generation of royals being okay with anything that keeps them relevant rather than slipping into the background like other European royals.

Not saying I believe any of this myself - just think it's somewhat plausible conjecture for fun and we definitely don't see all that's there with powerful families :)

There was another blind about Megan lying to her boyfriend about her ability to have kids and it would be interesting to see his reaction when she does get pregnant. Sounds way more like January Jones to me.

hamm isnt a decent guy. didnt he haze a the fraternity iniates at his college and get caught and arrested? wasnt he the pledge master?he’s just another sicko that its in perfectly with the rest of hollyweird

This is confusing as it says the baby is a secret... not that the paternity is the secret. January's baby is OUT THERE but the man who fathered the baby is not. I wish the wording would be better on these blinds.

Some of y’all ain’t thinking! It’s not Janet Jackson her secret baby would be 30 if the child existed.plus Janet is primarily a singer not actress, Janet makes a movie ever 9 years on average. It’s not Meghan Markle’s. If she had a secret child, her dumbass sister would’ve dropped dime a lot no time ago.

The Markles were used as a distraction for the Royal Family so the spotlight would be off Prince Charles being linked to Peter Ball former Clergy man who is a paedophile. A statement from Prince Charles was read out on the 27th July 2018 to the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA). It was a five-day case study into how allegations against the former Church of England bishop were handled comes to a close.

You cannot have a King to be linked to another paedophile after another of his close friends Jimmy Saville's major paedophile scandal. So the Markles were brought in to bring headlines and to keep Prince Charles away from scrutiny. Not one person questioned why he did not appear in person and why he was allowed to write a letter instead of being under oath answering questions. So he threw the new daughter in law to the wolves. He is a lovely father in law isn't he?

Advertisement

Patreon

Search Crazy Days and Nights

Get in touch & Follow us

Advertisement

Labels

Advertisement

Design By

Advertisement

Disclaimer & Privacy Policy

Crazy Days and Nights is a gossip site. The site publishes rumors, conjecture, and fiction. In addition to accurately reported information, certain situations, characters and events portrayed in the Blog are either products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies; the Blog’s proprietor does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. Links to content on and quotation of material from other sites are not the responsibility of Crazy Days and Nights.

Cookies & 3rd Party Advertisements
Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on your site. Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to your users based on their visit to your sites and other sites on the Internet. Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org/managing/opt_out.asp.