Despite all evidence to the contrary, Fark's resident box office return fanatic writes yet another contrarian headline from the cold, clammy recesses of the internet. Seriously, when you aren't completely wrong about the numbers, you're claims about whichever movie are usually the opposite of the truth. I basically use these headlines like I use Armond White reviews, so thanks for being a sub-standard barometer, I suppose.

Trust me, you have friends. I think Citizen Kane is over hyped too. Not that either wasn't a cinematic cornerstone and an important achievement. I feel the same way about Gone with the Wind. I get the significance, I'm just not a fan.

Saw it on Friday on IMAX and in 3D. It was dull until the last 30 minutes. If it were a superhero movie, it would have been the "Origin of the Green Witch as played by Meg Griffin".

The last 30 minutes were awesome enough to make up for the first 90. However, will not be seeing it again or buying the DVD.

I saw it just in 3d, because the 2d was sold out. It honestly wasn't that bad of movie, and I didn't think the cgi was that fail. Yes some parts weren't that good. Also I thought acting was ok, and that the actors were trying to play as they were actors in the 1930s. At least in the beginning of the film. I think the movie would of been better if they explained a little more detail of the origins of sister witches more, and not just have a quick cop out on how one was in power, and the other one was so naive. Then she becomes the bad guy at the end wtf? I thought the ending was great, and it is worth it alone to see the cameo of Bruce Campbell.

This and other movies are benefitting from the virtual studio monopoly. If I want to go see a movie with my kid this month... Oz is about the only choice. So they make bank whether it's good or not. My moviegoing friends and I haven't done a movie outing in two months because there's nothing showing that doesn't just make you one shade dumber.