HEADLINE MADE READER STRUGGLE.

My wife took this the way it was intended, so I guess it’s not as bad as I first thought, but when I saw the NY Times headline:Some Made Men Struggle to Make Ends Meet
I took made as a transitive verb and read it as “Some [people] made [=forced] men struggle to make ends meet”; I assumed it was about exploitative bosses or the like. Turns out it’s about “made men,” i.e. mobsters, having economic problems. Bad headline writer! No biscuit!

Comments

I caught it on an immediate re-read. Quotes or italics or something would have solved the problem.
The bigger question is: what’s the story with article? Does the NY Times write about crack dealers who suffer reversals, or pimps with human resources challenges?

I caught it on an immediate re-read. Quotes or italics or something would have solved the problem.
The bigger question is: what’s the story with article? Does the NY Times write about crack dealers who suffer reversals, or pimps with human resources challenges?

I didn’t know ‘made men’ meant mobsters. Self made men used to mean entrepreneurs, right?
The Fortean Times has Extra! Extra! every month, a list of ill considered headlines.
“Professor dies, leaves mark”
“Dead are advised to move Quickly”
Etc. No biscuits for any of them.

I think a hyphen would have made all the difference:
Some Made-men Struggle to Make Ends Meet
Made man (or Made men) seems a little like the kind of compound that most germanic languages would write as one word though I stress the last word which makes it more like an adjective + noun
I read it right the first time, probably because of the alert that it was confusing. I don’t know how I would have read without being forewarned.

I’m reading The Bostonians by Henry James, and just this morning I came across the word “underfed”. I read it however as “un-derfed” and spent a decent while wondering what “derfed” meant.
Thankfully it wasn’t a Joyce work, or I would have probably thought it was a Joycean invention.
But a couple of pages later, I read something like:
“he knew no ladies, drank much beer, and was familiar with an actress”
Knew no ladies and was familiar with an actress? What?
Then I remembered when the book was written.

Made man (or Made men) seems a little like the kind of compound that most germanic languages would write as one word though I stress the last word which makes it more like an adjective + noun
I think everybody stresses the last word, which means it is in fact an adjective + noun, so you can’t write it as one word. I guess “goombahs” would have been beneath the Times‘ dignity.I came across the word “underfed”. I read it however as “un-derfed” and spent a decent while wondering what “derfed” meant.
When I was a kid I thought bedraggled was “bed-raggled” and bedridden was the past participle of a verb “bedride”—ah, the joys of morphology!

“made men” was totally new to me – at first I thought it meant “self-made men” (men who rose in society by their own talents and activities rather than through being born and raised in a higher class) until I read the article. Would “made men” refer to those who became rich through illegal activities, as opposed to “self-made men”?
“made men” is apparently a translation from Italian. In French, “un homme fait” is a physically mature man – let’s say over 30 or 35 yrs old (similarly for “une femme faite”) and usually also implies a socially mature person who has achieved a stable adult personality and place in society. Does that ring a bell with Italian?
Re English be- verbs: not too long ago I was looking at a book on bears in which the authors quoted some of the English vocabulary etymologically associated with bears (brown, bruin, etc), including “berate”! I had never thought that the word could be interpreted as anything else than be-rate, as in be-come, be-have, be-lieve etc – in many if not most of these words the meaning is not obviously related to the meaning of the root (assuming that the latter still exists), and be-rate is no exception. Has anyone thought of, or run into the same misinterpretation of “berate” as bear-ate (as in calcul-ate)?

Made man (or Made men) seems a little like the kind of compound that most germanic languages would write as one word though I stress the last word which makes it more like an adjective + noun
No, German writes gemachte Männer (…which would be a rare expression meaning, I think, “men who won’t ever have financial problems anymore”). What makes such examples in English so hard to understand is that the past tense and the past participle are identical for regular verbs, unique within Standard Average European and, frankly, a bad idea.

And you can support my book habit without even spending money on me by following my Amazon links to do your shopping (if, of course, you like shopping on Amazon); I get a small percentage of every dollar spent while someone is following my referral links, and every month I get a gift certificate that allows me to buy a few books (or, if someone has bought a big-ticket item, even more). You will not only get your purchases, you will get my blessings and a karmic boost!

Favorite rave review, by Teju Cole:
"Evidence that the internet is not as idiotic as it often looks. This site is called Language Hat and it deals with many issues of a linguistic flavor. It's a beacon of attentiveness and crisp thinking, and an excellent substitute for the daily news."

From "commonbeauty"

(Cole's blog circa 2003)

All comments are copyright their original posters. Only messages signed "languagehat" are property of and attributable to languagehat.com. All other messages and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily state or reflect those of languagehat.com. Languagehat.com does not endorse any potential defamatory opinions of readers, and readers should post opinions regarding third parties at their own risk. Languagehat.com reserves the right to alter or delete any questionable material posted on this site.