?? - Networking

This is a discussion on ?? - Networking ; what can be cause of this? loss of packets in cable? tnx
Reply from 192.168.41.37: bytes=32 time
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 192.168.41.37: bytes=32 time
Reply from 192.168.41.37: bytes=32 time
Reply from 192.168.41.37: bytes=32 ...

If you are using IP over Carrier Pigeons, then perhaps it's hunters
with guns.

Seriously, why don't you tell more about your problem?
Is this a ping command you are executing? What are the command line options?
Please describe the hardware.
Are the source and destination on the same LAN?
Are there routers? Firewalls? Modems?

That's been available for quite some time - I think it may have been
added to the 2.2.7 kernel, and I don't think it has been replaced or
superseded in the current kernels. BICBW (For those who don't pay
attention to networking standards, there is an earlier version of
this protocol that predates Linux:

but as you can see, it was experimental, and I don't think it was made
available in very many operating systems. I also have not heard of the
RFC4824 networking protocol being added to the 2.6 kernel.)
>Seriously, why don't you tell more about your problem?
>Is this a ping command you are executing? What are the command line
>options?

From the TTL, it's some version of windoze - NT, XP, W2k, or maybe
vista - I'm not sure where Linux might be involved.

Old guy

Re: ??

[snip]
> That's been available for quite some time - I think it may have been
> added to the 2.2.7 kernel, and I don't think it has been replaced or
> superseded in the current kernels. BICBW (For those who don't pay
> attention to networking standards, there is an earlier version of
> this protocol that predates Linux:
>
> 1149 Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams on avian carriers.
> D. Waitzman. April 1 1990. (Format: TXT=3329 bytes) (Updated by
> RFC2549) (Status: EXPERIMENTAL)
>
> but as you can see, it was experimental, and I don't think it was made
> available in very many operating systems. I also have not heard of the
> RFC4824 networking protocol being added to the 2.6 kernel.)

Here are the some of the details about a Linux implementation of
RFC1149.

Re: ??

On Fri, 03 Oct 2008, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.networking, in
article , Scott Hemphill wrote:
>ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld (Moe Trin) writes:
>> (For those who don't pay attention to networking standards, there
>> is an earlier version of this protocol that predates Linux:
>>
>> 1149 Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams on avian carriers.
>> D. Waitzman. April 1 1990. (Format: TXT=3329 bytes) (Updated by
>> RFC2549) (Status: EXPERIMENTAL)
>>
>> but as you can see, it was experimental, and I don't think it was made
>> available in very many operating systems.
>Here are the some of the details about a Linux implementation of
>RFC1149.
>
>http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/

Yabbut I don't think I can convince INS to issue an H-1B to Andy Capp
(even if he's still around). All of the locals here are operating
falcons or hawks of some kind, and I don't think they'd be interested
in the maintenance aspect of pigeons. Feed-stock or training aids
maybe, but racing? Nah