Since time is running short as a temporary substitute for reading the entire book, I'm posting a few videos to give people enough information to at least arm themselves before Election Day 2016. The videos are brief and are a total of 25 minutes, one 5 minutes, one 6, one 10 and the last one 4. I'm also including parts of the the Introduction and Conclusion, so most will be able to digest this in an hour or two. The videos total 25 minutes. Those alone will dramatically change most people's view of their world in all likelihood.

“We live entangled in webs of endless deceit, in a highly indoctrinated society where elementary truths are easily buried.”

- Professor Noam Chomsky

This book aims to unearth several of the grandest buried truths most people will find shocking. What’s presented will at times seem outright unbelievable. However, the evidence is what it is. How on earth can a minority fool a majority at the height of the Information Age? It seems so unlikely. All I ask of anyone is to take a look at the evidence I’ve gathered for over a decade and a half and presented in as simple manner as I could. Please don’t believe anything I say or write. I’m just asking for you to look at my findings and think things through for yourself. Unless you like living with harmful lies and don’t mind not knowing the truth, I don’t think you’ll be disappointed. Besides, the world needs you. As it stands now we’re all losing as you’ll soon see, even those who are the roots of these problems, for they too live in a far more dangerous and sickening world than need be. Everyone counts one way or the other and make no mistake about it, we’re all making history right now. Will an INFORMolution happen with this book? I honestly don’t know. What I do know is that it should and I have done my best to give you the reasons why. I hope my best is good enough. There is far too much inefficiency, misery and danger to ignore. I wrote to Professor Chomsky last year and said I felt as if we’re all living in a giant insane asylum. He wrote me back saying that case was easy to make. We need to stop the insanity together as soon as possible. Please read on.

Part I –ELECTION SPOILERS

IntroductionThe following are three quotes (in addition to the Noam Chomsky one above regarding the buried elementary truths) to always keep in mind when reading this book.

“The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed, in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.” - Bertrand Russell, 20th century philosopher, pictured to the left and behind Professor Noam Chomsky in the photo above with Ken from 2003“See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda.” - George W. Bush, (photo below from Ken’s February 2001 “proxy” interview with the president, in which the Iraq War was brought up over two years before it began)

“Science is the search for the truth--it is not a game in which one tries to beat his opponent, to do harm to others. We need to have the spirit of science in international affairs, to make the conduct of international affairs the effort to find the right solution, the just solution of international problems, and not an effort by each nation to get the better of other nations, to do harm to them when it is possible. I believe in morality, in justice, in humanitarianism.” - Linus Pauling This should also apply to national affairs too of course.WHATEVER ITS ORIGINAL SOURCE IS, our five billion year old solar system has given birth to us all, no doubt. In reality we share this moment of time together on this planet and have the ability to communicate worldwide like never before in history. Recalling that the Sumerians were able to transmit thought via writing millennia ago; cannot we at the height of theInformation Agespread censored critical news to enough to matter in time? If you keep reading you’ll soon see who your worst enemies are and how you can legally, morally, and effectively defend yourself and everyone else you care about against them. The widely held belief that people are basically divided into two political camps “conservative” or “liberal” is but a media manufactured distortion of reality likely developed simply to divide the people amongst themselves. I’m not claiming neither has its gripes. I am saying that we're all getting royally scammed to such a point the very survival of our species is at stake right now and their complaints pale in comparison to that and the other concerns discussed herein. Neither side can reasonably be considered conservative or liberal, as is presented repetitively by multiple sources throughout this book. A rational person would think these matters would dominate discussion, and hopefully this will soon be the case.

Possibilities vs. Impossibilities

Surely most will agree that no matter what anyone does, the Earth will still be spinning around the Sun, making a complete revolution in just over 365 days. That much won’t change. What might change is how we treat the problem of our ailing atmosphere, which we as humans need not be harming, though we clearly are, thus putting at considerable risk the continued survival of our very species within this century.* That just doesn’t make sense, does it? It happens because most people don’t know a handful or so of irrefutable truths, and they vote in disfavor of themselves and their world by choosing those whose interests lie in the gluttony of a disproportionate few over the survival of humankind. The Information Age could very well be called The Age of Ignorance, which, I’m hoping, with your help, will soon come to a close. It’s time to stop complaining about our society and become honorable participants in its governing at the highest of levels. If you, along with others including me, put forth the effort to inform others, and ask them to ask others to do the same, we have a chance of getting out of this mess. Otherwise, we don’t. Each of us could very well be the deciding factor. Please think about that.

The United Nations is in the United States, so how come we have to find out paramount concerns such as the above via Canada and England? At least with the internet it’s easy to do. A handful of media-censored topics are primarily discussed in Part I, those being:

1) The media’s open distortion of elections;

2) The mass caging of known innocents at taxpayers' and children’s expense, while leaving more real criminals at large in society as a result;

3) The royal tax scam;

4) We could be growing our own oil;

and...

5) The way out of this mess, should enough of us make the effort of our lives as if our lives depended on it-as is surely the case-and as if the fate of humankind was in our hands, as it is. What’s here is elementary, profound, censored, and luckily also easily verifiable. Never “believe” anything I say or write. My goal is for people to understand things, not believe.

The "545 People" Charlie Reese discussed in his famous article* are steering our ship here in the most influential nation on Earth, and we elect all but 9 of them. It's about time we started making decisions based on reason, not who's put in our faces and spend beaucoup bucks to fool us into making insane choices.

After first meeting with Noam Chomsky on October 25, 2002, regarding our findings exposing media-censored elections, he said to us on camera upon leaving what’s quoted below.

“Terrific. You bring it to others.”

End of Introduction

Conclusion: “Blessed are the Censors, for they shall inhibit the Earth!” – Alfred E. Neuman, MAD Magazine, June 1970As stated in Chapter 20, I'm proposing we overcome the election censors and choose candidates who are not puppets of huge campaign contributors. Additionally I’m proposing we tell the others who do have wealthy campaign contributors that their scam has been revealed, and we realize how they’re shafting the people. We’re hardly setting the bar too high in asking them to stop the Drug War, the wars overseas, the illegality of useful plants such as industrial hemp, and revert the tax structure to something like it was in the 1960s, with modifications as discussed. I also would like to see UFO/ET disclosure discussed, which if anyone thinks is out there, how do you explain why the government openly investigated it from the end of 1947 to the end of 1969? Was it all for nothing? Do you really think that? In this manuscript I drove home one case, that of Roswell. All it takes is one case to open up this can of worms, though I did add another in which retired Captain David Schindele of the Air Force testified about something he’d seen and was even discussed in the December 17, 1966 issue of the Saturday Evening Post, but what the Post article didn’t mention was what its writers had no way of knowing, that the widely reported UFO took all the nuclear missiles offline, meaning it just shut them all down, or coincidentally they all shut down as the UFO appeared, though nothing like that had ever happened before. It was rare for even one to go offline. Um, don’t you think that has a wee bit to do with national security? Captain Shindele testified that he didn’t tell anyone about it for over 39 years, not even his wife! Concerning something else in the sky that has been identified yet hasn’t been explained, wouldn’t it be nice to know what the aerial spraying is all about we’re seeing these days? Jet aircraft don’t leave trails that go across the entire visible sky and then spread out from there. This is not jet fuel exhaust. If it was then we would’ve been seeing this all through the jet age, not just the last 20 years or so. Is it helping to counter global warming? If so, then why all the secrecy? We need disclosure about this as well. Autism seemed to pop out of nowhere, around the same time we started seeing these trails, which reportedly contain aluminum, barium and strontium. Excuse me, but we aren’t supposed to be breathing metals, nor are we designed to consume these things, but if they’re dumping it in the sky it’s falling to earth. Therefore, there is no such thing as organic anymore, unless it’s grown in a green house. Otherwise, it’s been sprayed. Once you see this it’s beyond comprehension that it hasn’t created more of a public outcry. I can’t help but think of the words of a former high school teacher of mine Mr. Louis Couche who used to say, “The best way to keep a secret is to mimeograph it and hand it out.” I used to think his statement was foolish, until I saw this happening and most people not having a clue that this astronomically expensive military campaign was happening right over their heads.SOAP – Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan Everyone wants a better world but few have a plan. In medicine there’s an acronym, SOAP, Subjective – the patient’s complaint(s), Objective – the doctor’s findings, Assessment – what’s it called and Plan – what can be done to treat the malady? No doctor practices without a plan, yet most who struggle for a better world have no plan, at least here in the US. The plan is to replace political puppets with people and pressure the ones who haven’t been replaced to finally do what’s reasonable instead of cowing to their puppeteers. None of this is rocket science. We’re all being royally scammed and the caring and brave who are informed have certainly had enough. Are there enough of us? Only time will tell, but I’m not going to give in to being shafted by a small proportion of humans who are scamming and endangering the world. It’s up to each person to either try or side with the disproportionate minority of the nation’s and world’s insane oppressors. Unlike other industrialized nations with similar governmental structures, we don't have a single member of any political party except Democrats and Republicans in all national positions discussed by Charlie Reese. We should push for fair open televised debates in which all candidates who are on the ballot, or in the case of the presidency enough ballots to win, are invited to participate. If they don't include them, then I suggest we take a good look at who they censored and vote according to common sense and decency, not who advertises more, or has more charisma.

As this book goes to print it looks like it's going to be a four way race for President of the United States in 2016, Trump as the Republican, Dr. Jill Stein for the Green Party, former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson, a Libertarian and long time outspoken critic of the Drug War, and Hillary Clinton on the Democratic side. Regarding Trump, suppose he stops Muslims from entering the country, what's to stop someone from being a radical Islamic terrorist posing as a born-again Christian? Did not Soviet spies infiltrate the CIA? Surely that was a lot more difficult than posing as a Christian. It's best we get at the roots of these problems, not cause more of them by fighting fanaticism with fanaticism. In one of the debates Trump openly proclaimed the Iraq War should’ve never happened, cost us some two trillion dollars, and much loss of lives and limbs. What I don’t understand is if he knows this, why does he want to bomb ISIS, which doesn’t even have its own country, knowing that these tactics lead to further destabilization?

In my opinion considering what I learned in Harlem as discussed in Part I, Chapters 2 and 6, platform matters most. And when it comes down to platform, Dr. Jill Stein comes out ahead in many areas, though not all. I have problems with her stated stance on the rights to gun ownership, saying the “mentally ill” should not have gun access. Everyone alive has some classification in the DSM, the bible of mental illnesses. Lincoln got severely depressed and thus would not be able to own a gun under this criteria. As for the other races, I suggest helping Greens and like-minded independents by supporting their candidacies, so we can join the rest of the civilized world in having a variety of people in Congress, not merely factions of what Noam Chomsky has called "The Business Party," who aren't for you, aren't for your loved ones, not for the world, and if they really thought things through not even for themselves, since they too live in a more dangerous world than need be just a few button pushes away from changing forever. If your only other choice is a Libertarian, then please bring up social issues to that candidate. Ask specifically if she or he would like to see the end of unnecessary infant and childhood deaths at a rate of about 700* per hour worldwide for what just a fraction of the Pentagon budget could stop. There has been an improvement in this area, yet the tragedy continues. It’s still outrageous, but has for whatever reasons come down from the 1000 per hour talked about elsewhere in this manuscript. If we don’t get to elect people outside the two aspects of “The Business Party,” then we need to let those who are in office realize fully that we want the inefficiencies and barbarism discussed herein stopped immediately. Each of us is making history at this critical time of human existence. In the opinion of a politically enlightened friend of mine who's of the ripe age of 21, it's the time to live if you think about it. We're the deciders regarding which way things are going to tip. Will reason prevail? "It's up to us," as Dr. Edgar Mitchell stated as per the conclusion of Part 1. Let's do this. If enough of us try we'll win. We have the internet. We have social media. We can break through the lies and spread the truths. We don’t need a revolution. We need an INFORMolution. We need to elect people over political puppets based on common sense, not on who spent more, or who was or was not included in televised debates. We also need to pressure the puppets to stop the insanity. Remember, we’re not setting the bar very high here and none of this is rocket science. It’s all easy to understand. We’re all in this together. May WE prevail, together, now. My hope is that enough come away from this book understanding the following:

1) US federal elections are a farce that comes at an enormous expense, not limited to just those in the United States, but also those in many other places throughout the globe. Their scam is hardly complicated. Candidate debates are held and televised omitting candidates who are on the ballot, or in the case of the presidency, enough ballots to win the election. The media simply pretend the others don’t exist. One of my earlier titles for this book was “Same Old Scam.” With the internet the scam can be overcome, which has been my simple message since the year 2000. It’s even easier now, and finally happened with the Sanders campaign in March 2016. His supporters bombarded Twitter with tweets about why he still very much had a chance to win the Democratic nomination and they said why. The media had been trying to claim it was over for the Sanders campaign. Well, his supporters helped overcome the media with this tweet bombardment. He went on to have crushing defeats over Hillary Clinton in Alaska, Hawaii and the state of Washington immediately afterwards. In the end of course he threw in the towel, much to the chagrin of many, if not most, of his supporters.

2) It seems that one aspect of Bernie Sanders’ idea of socialism is to raise the taxes only for the wealthy back just a tiny bit higher than what Ronald Reagan had first lowered them to, which was 50%, but had been 91% when Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower left office in 1961. That’s hardly socialism in my opinion, and does nothing to lessen the burden on the poor and middle classes.* *Even Sanders himself admitted that he was less of a socialist than Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower here http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Bernie_Sanders_Tax_Reform.htm What apparently seemed to be understood in Eisenhower’s day but not now is that people only make money via two avenues, Earth and human resources, since we’re not importing either from Mars. The top one percent of income earners are paying just 39.6% now, which is no doubt no small part of why we’ve seen this vast divide between the ultra-wealthy and everyone else over the last few decades, instead of having the tide rise for all as it should’ve as we improved technologically in leaps and bounds. It stands to reason that the top one percent should now be broken down further since someone making half a million dollars a year is not anywhere near the same as someone making a billion, or billions of dollars a year. When Eisenhower left office, there was no such thing as a billionaire, only millionaires. Howard Hughes is the one I remember most from my youth. The bottom line is, if the ultra-wealthy paid their fair share, or closer to their fair share, things could be a lot better for the rest of us. I know plenty of people who’ve been overburdened due to taxes, and that just shouldn’t be. These are not people living high on the hog. They are people who are struggling like far too many in order to give those who’ve figured out a way to get everyone else to do their work for them, or have used Earth’s resources, or both, a break. If it’s true that the Bush tax cuts cost the nation trillions, with him lowering the rate for his favorite one percent of the population from 39.6% to 35%, imagine how much cuts that went from 91% to 39.6% have cost us. And please, if anyone runs into Ann Coulter, who will likely bring up that the uppermost of income earners pay a disproportionate share of the overall taxes, ask Ann how they make their money. They skip that part don’t they? One case I’ve talked about is about someone who was called a “self-made billionaire” by the major media who made his money from oil. Please, did he create the oil? Did he make the steel the ships that transported it were made of? Did he make the ships? Did he drill for the oil? Did he navigate the ships that delivered the oil? How then, can anyone explain, is he a “self-made billionaire?”

3) Hemp reportedly has over 25,000 uses according to the February 1938 issue of Popular Mechanics, yet it’s illegal. How can any sane beings claim that making an Earth given plant illegal is the right thing to do, much less such a useful one, but really any plant? How would we explain our behavior to a superior intelligence if given the chance? Hemp’s uses are vast. One of its uses is for fuel. Its seeds can be crushed and its stalks fermented to make fuel. Henry Ford had a car that ran on hemp seed oil. Not only that but it was used to make the exterior of an automobile, reportedly making it several times stronger than steel, as anyone can see by doing a search on YouTube for the Ford hemp car. There’s a guy hitting the trunk with an ax will all his might and not making a dent. Don’t believe me, check for yourself.

To have this plant illegal is absolutely insane. This is one area Elaine and I have been told we made an impact here in Virginia, since a bill to legalize hemp just passed unanimously, and being that both of us ran as the first married couple to do so in the history of Virginia, we got enough media coverage for the hemp issue to take off. It was something we could say with concision, which Chomsky correctly argues is what’s required when dealing with today’s US corporate media. So, we talked about it, a lot. We can push issues, even with puppets in office, and this is why I encourage everyone to do just that, in addition to trying to get marginalized candidates on the ballots for every federal office possible and demanding they be included in televised debates.

4) The Drug War has resulted in the “Land of the Free” becoming the “Land of the Caged,” with more incarcerates per capita and even in total than any nation on Earth. Are we any safer? No. When stats were first taken in the 1960s, 90% of homicides were reportedly solved in the US. Now it’s 64%, meaning whereas it used to be that just one in ten got away with murder, now more than one of three do! Of course this also means there will be more criminals of every real kind at large because law enforcement can’t do two things at the same time. This is taking away from them finding more murderers, pedophiles, rapists, thieves, along with every other real crime as well as missing people including children. So, if you’re for the Drug War, you’re for having more murderers at large, having more missing people not found, and so forth. And that’s not all. I know a woman who was told that the person who raped her would do his entire five year sentence, yet they let him out two years early in order to snitch on people for marijuana! How sick is that! I saw some of the impact this had on loved ones when I practiced and it wasn’t pretty. What about the children whose parents are taken from them when sent to live in cages for illegitimate reasons? If they only have one parent they become orphans. If they have two sometimes both are busted and they still become orphans. Either way losing one parent is abusive. Is this not state sanctioned tax funded child abuse? Elaine does a lot with animal rescues. How many pet owner turn ins” are due to the Drug War? No one knows.

Below: From Sad to Glad

These are two of our thirteen dog rescues, Gomer is pictured on the left top before his rescue and on the bottom afterwards with Elaine, and that’s Maverick on the right, before and after. They were both owner surrenders for reasons we were not told. They are both wonderful dogs. Aren’t they all?Again, we end up with more unjustified misery due to this continued insanity where bad medicine is purposefully administered to the masses, not only children, but also on pets, and of course adults as well. Every arrest for this nonsense is a crime whose tentacles are not reported on television or newspapers, but they’re real all right. How do the people involved live with themselves? Well, some don’t. Some have seen the light. Please take the time to check out LEAP, Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, to see I’m hardly alone saying we need to stop this ongoing insanity. http://leap.ccPlease take a moment to read LEAP’s mission statement about wanting to heal and help normalize the relationship between police and the general population, which is something that’s decayed enormously throughout this unjust war against people’s rights to liberty. Furthermore, if the nation thought drugs were a crime then Obama would not have been elected, because he admitted to doing cocaine and not getting caught. Imagine if he said he held up a convenience store but didn’t get caught, or he had mugged or raped someone. So, clearly the nation knows the difference between crimes and non-crimes. No victim, no crime. It’s not very complicated. How will future historians, if there are any, look back at this time when we locked people up in violent cages en masse for invalid reasons at such an enormous expense?

5) On July 08, 1947, ABC radio reported that a “flying disc” had crashed and been recovered by the Army Air Force on a ranch outside of Roswell, New Mexico. They later reported that it was all a mistake and what had been thought of as being something from out of this world was actually just a weather balloon. Roswell was home to the 509th, the ones who bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I ask the reader to think about this; why would they leave people in charge of nuclear weapons who were so inept they didn’t know the difference between a weather balloon and something not made on Earth? Hundreds of witnesses to aspects of the case have come forward and we have our choice, to believe them or the government’s view of what happened. There are plenty of other solid cases. This book mostly focuses on one of them. If it happened once, it can happen more than once. And it has. If you don’t think this is important ask yourself this, why would the government go to such lengths to hide this from us for going on 70 years if it wasn’t? Surely you don’t think in light of everything else discussed it’s for our own good, do you? I trust there is more than enough evidence to convict regarding Roswell in this book thanks to the 2013 Citizen Hearing in Washington, DC, of which I was close enough to attend three of the five days by driving back and forth for the parts I was most interested in hearing and filming.

6) Less than 3 weeks after the crash reported above, the National Security Act of 1947 was enacted. This created a “secret government” according to the respected journalist Bill Moyers in his famous special, The Secret Government: The Constitution in Crisis, who are not elected and answer to no one. During the Iran-Contra hearings, Senator Daniel Inouye stated, “There exists a shadowy government with its own air force, its own navy, its own fund raising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas of national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the law itself.” What “fund raising mechanism?” They aren’t having bake sales, but they have been linked to the drug trade. Can it get any sicker? Yes, it can actually. Guess who Colonel Jesse Marcel, Jr., MD said was at the heart of the whole ET issue, having the entire thing in its hands? That’s right, the secret government. And please don’t anyone bring up anything about conspiracy theories. The National Security Act of 1947 is not a conspiracy theory. Admittedly their link to the Drug War is a theory, but I can’t think of any other and I doubt seriously that outside this county the CIA earning the name, Cocaine Importing Agency, has not been without cause. 7) “WE’RE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT THE WEATHER!,” was a feature article in the April 1972 issue of National Geographic magazine, and they are. Don’t you think we should have a right to know what it is they’re using to seed clouds, or are they using the same old techniques from the 60s discussed in this article? Surely they’re doing something because jet trails didn’t spread across the sky until the last couple of decades or so, other than in some kind of experimentation in the 40s everyone likes to cite, and I’m sure they experimented elsewhere here and there. The way I discovered this “nugget” was by looking back in National Geographic magazines trying to find the oldest one in which I’d see a proliferating trail like we see today. I found it, but they called it a contrail. If that was the case then how come there aren’t tons of photos of proliferating trails from that time period? Proliferating trails were not generally seen in the 60s, 70s, 80s, and roughly half way through the 90s in most places, though they reportedly did tinker with things in some areas during that period, so one might come up with a photograph or two but nothing like today’s crisscrossed lines and all the other abnormal patterns we see. Weather manipulation is old hat. Exhaust fumes under any atmospheric conditions do not proliferate while maintaining an uninterrupted line from horizon to horizon, period. What impact this is having on global warming is anyone’s guess. Is it helping? Is it harming? We know Emergency Rooms get overwhelmed with respiratory patients following reported sprayings. That much was even admitted in the 2007 Chemical Contrails documentary on the Discovery Channel. Reportedly there are increased levels of barium, aluminum and strontium after these sprayings in soil samples. We’re not supposed to be breathing in metals. That’s not a normal part of our atmosphere’s chemical composition.

8) Every hour approximately 700 children die worldwide of preventable causes that just a fraction of the Pentagon budget could completely stop. In other words they die of neglect. No shores of Normandy Beach need be invaded to save them. They just need to be seen as real and the people demand that they be given the medicine(s), the food and/or the clean water they need. 9) We all have a common ancestor out of Africa who was dark skinned and thus we’re all, as Jimi Hendrix sang in his song Machine Gun, “families apart.” In the 1960s I grew up as we got away from the term “colored people,” yet now people are separated anew and called “people of color.” Excuse me, but I’ve never met a colorless person in my life. Let’s get over bogus divisions, OK?

10) There could be peace in the Middle East between Israel and Palestine if the US and Israel weren’t blocking it from happening.

11) Everyone who’s on enough state ballots to win, meaning almost surely Trump, Clinton, Stein and Gary Johnson of the Libertarian Party for 2016, should have a right to debate the others under fair conditions on television for all to see. No one should be left out. The fifteen percent inclusionary rate is far from democratic, especially since the media have shoved two of the candidates in our faces for over a year, and refused to give us a fair look at the others. No matter what happens in the 2016 Elections, we need to “Keep pushing ahead” to borrow the words of the late Jimi Hendrix from his final song Straight Ahead. We have to push for these truths to be uncovered and demand that we cease doing harmful things to our society, outlawing solutions and having overall insane inefficiency. It must stop, and we must also demand that we have fair federal elections, which we have every two years, or we will continue in the downward spiral we’re in quite possibly past the point of no return.12) We’re all making history at this critical time of human existence on Earth, one way or the other. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// I’d like to thank every rational person who helps spread these truths to enough to matter in time as we all make history together at this most critical time of human existence on the crust of this rock we call Earth.“Pass it on. Pass it on, to the young and old.” - Jimi Hendrix, from his final song, Straight Ahead

"Look, you have two choices, you can say 'I'm a pessimist. Nothing's going to work. I'm giving up. I'll help ensure that the worst will happen.' Or you can grasp onto the opportunities that do exist, the rays of hope that exist and say, 'Well, maybe we can make it a better world.' It's not much of a choice." - Noam ChomskyElection 2016 update, August 2016, just before this book goes to print: If Hillary only has to face Trump from here on in and the media successfully censor the other candidates who are on enough ballots to win, or will be, meaning Jill Stein of the Green Party and former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson for the Libertarians, then I can’t say one way or the other who would win. I honestly don’t know, nor would I even venture to guess. Both Clinton and Trump are terrible, so the only choice is what flavor of terrible do you want? The point is that this should not be another media election. I’m not saying whether this book will make a difference at all, but I am putting it out there with close to a quarter lap around the Sun before the 2016 Election. At the height of the Information Age, I’m just saying, yes, it certainly COULD be done and in my opinion would be in a world that’s even remotely reasonable. On the surface we kind of know what to expect from Hillary, as Obama said himself when debating her eight years ago, ‘If you’re happy with the way things are now then Senator Clinton’s your candidate.’ We don’t know what to expect from Trump, and when one considers things like nuclear bombs and nuclear holocausts, that kind of gets a bit worrisome. I’m not saying I would vote for Hillary. I would be incapable of casting my vote in her favor. If there was no one else but those two I’d write in Donald Duck. I’m voting for Stein, period. She’s the best of the four who are, or will almost certainly be, on enough state ballots to win the presidency. If I have to write her name in, big deal. Gary Johnson has reportedly backed the TPP, so that really leaves him out even more so than before, because in comparison to Jill Stein when it comes to platform his is just not near as fair. So, I don’t care if Dr. Stein only gets on say 40 ballots, as opposed to Johnson’s 51 including DC, then that means she could get 80% of the vote, and if people realized this was like choosing whether to get smacked with a 32 oz hammer or with a feather, she’d get that 80%, or close to it anyway. Is it not insane to vote for pain, suffering, oppression, lack of safety and rights, all because you’re scared of someone even worse, especially since employing this tactic has arguably done us zero good since first employed in 2000? Here we are sixteen years later. Should we try it one more time? Who would vote in disfavor of themselves in so many ways if they only knew? If enough would rather have someone who is for peace in the Middle East verses someone who isn’t, who would tax the rich more over someone who won’t, and would work towards ending the Drug War that leaves more real criminals at large vs. someone who won’t, then Jill Stein can win the presidency. If with 3 days to go or so Jill saw it wasn’t happening, well then she could call a press conference and do what she wanted, so no one could accuse her of assisting a horrible person to obtain the most powerful known position of any human being on Earth. How’s that sound? What if Trump says he’ll adopt more of Stein’s platform than Hillary will? I wouldn’t be at all surprised. There was a recent article by John Pilger giving some pretty sound reasons in arguing the case that Hillary is worse than Trump.* See, https://newmatilda.com/2016/03/23/john-pilger-why-hillary-clinton-is-more-dangerous-than-donald-trump/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=socialnetwork Of course, in an informed world Dr. Stein would take away votes from both Clinton and Trump, enough so to win easily. Remember the online vote of 2000 at Time Magazine discussed early on in Part I, in which over a million people had responded and Nader got 58.77% the last time I checked, with Bush getting about half as many and Gore getting less than 10%. I’m not saying that it was a scientific study but it does stand to reason that someone reasonable in major ways her opponents are not would not have a rough time winning. An important point I want to make is that no matter how this election goes, we’ve GOT to keep pushing these issues until enough understand them. Then the gag will be up. If say 2/3 of the population understands even just half of the few hidden elementary truths presented in this book, how could the leaders and the corporate TV continue to misguide us on a highly destructive course all to satisfy the insatiable greed of a small percentage of cowardly psychopaths? I don’t think Jill Stein or anyone is qualified to take on all that’s been presented here. Whoever gets in must be backed by the people regarding these concerns. Forget about so-called swing states and safe states. People in all states have been voting against themselves, which is why you’ll never hear me discuss in depth this nonsense that has worked like a charm since 2000 to keep us focused on the lesser of evils, instead of where we should be. Even if we’re going third party, though not an evil choice, I doubt very seriously that Dr. Stein knows about a lot of what’s been covered in the second half of Part II of this book. It is highly recommended everyone see the Bill Moyers special entitled, The Secret Government: The Constitution in Crisis, from 1987 disclosing once again that Noam Chomsky’s statement about elementary truths being easily buried is in fact true. This is not the time to focus on so-called “safe” and “swing” states, especially when it’s arguable as to who is worse, is it? Do we not want someone reasonable for president? Is that asking too much? Let’s face it, Bill Clinton’s embargo against Iraq killed over half a million children. While it’s true no one is responsible for anyone else’s actions, Hillary was Bill’s wife during this entire atrocity, and there were no objections I’m aware of. Trump is scary in some ways, yet he’s never overseen an operation that resulted in half a million horrible deaths of little children and babies over a prolonged period of time, has he? So, who’s worse? Do we know for sure? Our message and these issues need to permeate the red and blue so everyone realizes they were and are getting shafted in monumental ways. All we’re requesting is they end this insanity. We’re not setting the bar very high here. Let the INFORMolution begin and the insanity begin to end. Life is hard enough without adding all this manufactured harmfulness and risk to the short time we have here. Enough is enough. We ought to be living life, not wasting it due to a minority of cruel people and a majority of duped ones, not at the height of the Information Age.