Offering a conservative counterbalance to the extreme left-coast liberalism of The Huffington Post

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

OVER AT THE NEW YORK TIMES THE WHITE MAN'S BURDEN IS TO BE WHITE BUT TO ACT AS THOUGH WHITENESS IS BAD WHILE REALLY BELIEVING IT IS ALL THAT MATTERS

Maureen Dowd

On July 6 I published a post on this Blog with the title:"One Must Pity Maureen Dowd, She is Such a MiserablyUnhappy Woman."

That post was primarily a reproduction of a post by Scipioon his Blog, TheReturnofScipio.blogspot.com, entitled:"The Emptiness of Maureen Dowd."

I was prompted to publish that post because I have such strong feelings that the New York Times is the source of so much that is wrong in the thinking of left liberals in our society. Dowd is a prominent columnist for the NYT and has been for many years. In her own way she epitomizes what is wrong with the NYT.

I must confess that back my liberal youth I believed that the NYT was the absolute bible for "all the news that is fit to print" and though I could ill afford it I subscribed to the Sunday Edition by mail for years. As St. Paul says, when I was a child I played with the things of a child, but now that I am grown up I have put away childish things.

What brings to me back to the subject of the NYT and Maureen Dowd is the appearance today of an absolutely brilliant article by Jeffrey Lord on the Ameican Spectator website. His article is entitled:"The Unbearable Whiteness of Being Maureen Dowd."You can view it here:http://spectator.org/archives/2009/07/21/the-unbearable-whiteness-of-be?utm_medium=email&utm_source=Email%20marketing%20software&utm_content=565193886&utm_campaign=Newsletter+_+kytlit&utm_term=The+Unbearable+Whiteness+of+Being+Maureen+Dowd

It is the funniest, most serious expose of the hypocrisy ofthe left-liberals you will ever read on the subject ofRACISM.

- Leo Rugiens

*********************************

BARRY SOETORO aka BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMAIS AUSURPER

He is not eligible to bePresident of the United Statesbecause he is not a Natural Born Citizenas required by Article Two, Section One, Clause Five of the United States Constitution.

This is a fact REGARDLESS ofwhere he was born (Mombassa, Hawaii, Chicago, Mecca or Mars).

He is not eligiblebecause he was not born ofTWO PARENTSBOTH OF WHOM WERE UNITED STATES CITIZENSat the time of his birth as required by the Constitution.His father was a subject/ciitizenof Kenya/Great Britain at the time of his birth and afterwards.The FACT that he was not born of TWO US CITIZEN PARENTS is all that matters. The question of his birth certificate is a distraction (a distraction fostered by Obama’s supporters?) that ought not to occupy our time and resources.

However, it is possible that he is not a United Statescitizen at all even if he was born in Kenya, as three witnesses have testified. The reason is because his mother could not pass her US citizenship on to her son because she did not live continuously in the United States for five full years after her fourteenth birthday as required by the US immigration law in effect during that period of time.

Check it out:http://www.TheObamaFile.com/ObamaNaturalBorn.htmAlso, an excellent introductory primer on Obama Presiidential Eligibility is to be found at:http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm

His usurpation can only be corrected (1) by Congress through his Impeachment and Removal [something which will never happen in a Congress controlled by Pelosi/Reid], or (2) it can becorrected by his resignation, which could happen if the public presssure on him to resign becomes great enough, or (3) by his removal by the United States Supreme Court affirming a Quo Warranto decision of the United States Federal District Court for the District of Columbia [which process Attorney General Eric Holder would never allow to even begin] or (4) by an amendment to the Constitution,which will never happen because that again would require the agreement of a Congress controlled by Pelosi/Reid._

HERE IS THE QUESTION WHICH EVERY AMERICAN CITIZEN SHOULD BE ASKING HIS OR HER CONGRESSMAN AND SENATORS

“During the 2008 election, then Senator Obama published a statement at his website which said that his birth status was ‘governed’ by the British Nationality Act of 1948. Can you please tell me, and the American people, how a person governed - at birth - by British law, can be a natural born citizen of the United States and thus constitutionally eligible to be President of the United States?”

Post a Comment

Translate This Blog

Followers

Subscribe To

Search This Blog

About Me

A Texan who loves the truth and hates the lying, cheating, and deliberate prevarication that characterizes so much of our civic discourse these days.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RIPOSTE, n. 1. Fencing: a quick thrust after parrying a lunge 2. a quick sharp return in speech or action; counterstroke.
- The Random House Dictionary of the English Language...........
You can contact me by sending an email to me at: leorugiens23@gmail.com