It lets me slide my computer up for standing, or slide it down so I can sit. I've been wanting to stand more at work for a while, but I haven't been able to find a good way to switch between standing and sitting. This stand seems to be fitting the bill pretty well.

Even better would be a whole desk surface that smoothly raises and lowers. There is a really nice line of tables from Steelcase in their Airtouch line, but they are more than twice the cost of this solution from Ergotron. Those Airtouch desks are nice because you can instantly raise and lower the desk rather that waiting for a slow electric screw mechanism that is common and "ADA" desks.

Get link

Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Google+

Email

Other Apps

Get link

Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Google+

Email

Other Apps

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

People will go to great lengths and inconvenience to avoid appearing or feeling stupid. A great example of when design makes a user feel stupid comes from Alan Coopers 1999 book The Inmates are Running the Asylum on page 24. Cooper is talking about the keyless entry system on his car keys.
"The large button locks the car and simultaneously arms the alarm. Pressing the button a second time disarms the alarm and unlocks the car. There is also a second smaller button labeled 'Panic.' When you press it, the car emits a quiet warble for a few seconds. If you hold it down longer, the quiet warble is replaced by the full 100-decibel blasting of the car alarm, whooping, tweeting, yowling, and declaring to everyone within a half-mile that some dolt--me--has just done something execrably stupid. What's worse, after the alarm has been triggered, the little plastic device becomes functionally inert, and further pressing of either button does nothing. The only way to stop that hon…

We haven't had a refresh on our strategy direction in my office for a few years. It seems like we are frequently torn between being efficient and being innovative.

Efficient

Lower costspeed to productionminimal failuresmaximum uptime
Innovative Higher costlots of failuresfreedom to pursue non-"approved" activitiesshorter attention span
I'm part of an IT shop with nearly 200 services that we offer to campus and internally. I love the feeling of being innovative, but I'm concerned that our current push is to be innovative at the expense of being efficient. The result is that we can't accomplish as much near-term good for the campus because our focus is on the longer term.