[ March 30, 2007: I wrote this as the Introduction chapter to my book in 2003 - almost exactly 4 years ago as the bombing of Iraq was underway and the American peoples were mesmerized by the "shock and awe" of a defenseless civilization on their television screens. Is another one about to commence on another defenseless nation - Iran? How relevant is this introduction today after all that has been disclosed over the past 4 years? Are the voices that are actually heard in the American mainstream only to be of those wearing the distinguished garb of "scholarship" lining the streets of Washington DC and the well walked hallways of the Ivys? When will the voices of the ordinary peoples themselves be allowed to inform the ordinary peoples? After all, it is us who are the ultimate enablers of "shock and awe", and also us who pay the heavy price. It is indeed only our profound complicity through our uncourageous silence and inaction that bestows the unspeakable power on the minority of opinion makers and the handful of hectoring hegemons which in turn enables them to send America's sons and daughters to new heights of barbarism while visiting the munificence of their high-tech "shock and awe" upon defenseless human beings. How can a civilization claiming to be a "populist democracy" permit such "imperial mobilizations"? Did "Good Germans" only live in Germany?]

What is the collective and individual responsibility of a people who live in a Democracy for the crimes of their government? Can the people morally claim the “I didn't know defense” and absolve themselves of culpability, the same defense claimed by the German citizenry for the Holocaust? Hitler had indeed come to power “legally”. He had motivated his reluctant people based on his well publicized doctrines in Mein Kampf, into the conquest of Europe. Now that he is vanquished, what does the civilized world think of him and his Nazi war machine? Or is it only the vanquished foe that we can see the faults with? Will our own faults also only come to light when we too have been vanquished? Or is there a less painful way to recognize that what we might be doing to the world has been done before, time and again? That the lessons of history might already be there as the low hanging fruits of wisdom ripe for the plucking?

In America too, the doctrines for world conquest have been outlined publicly:

I.1: Zbigniew Brzezinski's “Grand Chessboard”;

I.2: Documentation of “Project New American Century” signed by Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, among others, especially the report on “Rebuilding America's Defenses” - all of these are summarized in Exhibit A;

I.3: “Nuclear Posture Review” circulated to Congress by the White House and its details revealed in the Los Angeles Times wherein preemption and nuclear first strikes are the new superpower doctrine;

I.4: National Security Council strategy documents released by the White House on its web site;

I.5: Patriot Acts hurriedly rushed into law after 9-11 by the Congress;

I.6: And the fanatically held fundamentalist Evangelical Christian beliefs of her President that allows him to easily wage an endless “crusade” of “Infinite Justice” against the “evil-doers”;

all of which clearly point to where America is heading. All of this knowledge is just as publicly available today, as Mein Kampf was in the 1920s and 1930s, when Hitler's invasion of Eastern Europe came as a surprise to Western Europe and America. The concomitant policies of appeasement, in the futile hope of placating the new ambitious Alexander of the twentieth century, and the initial acquiescence of the world to Hitler's boldness, only emboldened him further. The following remark by the Chief American prosecuting judge at Nuremberg Military Tribunal is incredibly telling as he proceeded to hang those who dared to “goosestep the Herrenvolk across international frontiers”:

“The plans of Adolf Hitler for aggression were just as secret as Mein Kampf, of which over six million copies were published in Germany.”

“But justice in this case has nothing to do with some of the arguments put forth by the defendants or their counsel. We have not previously and we need not now discuss the merits of all their obscure and tortuous philosophy. We are not trying them for the possession of obnoxious ideas. It is their right, if they choose, to renounce the Hebraic heritage in the civilization of which Germany was once a part. Nor is it our affair that they repudiated the Hellenic influence as well. The intellectual bankruptcy and moral perversion of the Nazi regime might have been no concern of international law had it not been utilized to goosestep the Herrenvolk across international frontiers. It is not their thoughts, it is their overt acts which we charge to be crimes. Their creed and teachings are important only as evidence of motive, purpose, knowledge, and intent.”

Furthermore, the history of how Hitler took power through back door deals and legal maneuverings, the Reichstag fire, and how he convinced his generally war averse German public to successively occupy the Eastern European nations with new chicaneries each time, are well known. “Everybody against the war. People talking openly. How can a country go into a major war with a population so dead against it?” noted William Shirer, a war correspondent in Berlin, in his diary on the eve of World War II. “Hitler knew the answer well. Had he not the week before on his Bavarian mountaintop promised the generals that he would'give a propagandist reason for starting the war'and admonished them not to'mind whether it was plausible or not'? 'The victor', he had told them,'will not be asked afterward whether he told the truth or not. In starting and waging a war it is not the right that matters, but victory.'”

The bold highlights are Hitler's own words as noted by William Shirer, as they were disclosed in the Nuremberg trials. These ideas are well known as the Art of War making by an Aggressor around the world, and certainly are no secret to the journalism profession. Hitler was not the first to invent them, although he used them masterfully. In this instance, Hitler created the false pretext to attack Poland by synthesizing fake attacks on Germany by a handful of German soldiers disguised as Poles, the main operation being called “Canned Goods”. The personal motivations of Hitler, his belief in the “superiority” of the German race allowing him the “higher” prerogative to bomb and annihilate the “lesser” people for “protecting and perpetuating German lives”, is also known to everyone. Indeed, the role of deluded beliefs that bring suffering to other “lesser” humanity, as is “following orders” to execute heinous crimes against humanity, have been studied to “death” in America. The holocaust memories are kept constantly alive – an entire museum is dedicated to “never again” in Washington DC, directed by Holocaust survivor, Nobel Laureate Elie Wiesel.

And yet the American nation salutes “United We Stand”. How is that even possible?

The similarities with recent history of only 60 – 70 years ago are just too uncanny to escape notice, even for an isolated nation like America:

One: The coming to power of the Zionist Neo-Cons, fronted by the rather naïve and straightforward George Bush Jr., through legal maneuverings in the US supreme court and in Florida, with the active connivance of the Florida Secretary of State Kathleen Harris, the Florida Governor Jeb Bush (George Bush's real brother), the news media calling early election results that were false, and purposely not reporting the centralized voter list fraud that illegally black listed 57,700 voters in Florida who were unable to vote, almost all of them black, and majority of them Democrats, despite the fact that Greg Palast shared his investigative report of the fraud with them. All of these legal maneuverings that mesmerized and paralyzed the American nation into impotence while they waited with baited breadth for the powers to be to make the decision for them – a mouse democracy; eerily reminiscent of Hitler's own back room deals and “legal” maneuverings to come to power “legally” after his failed Putsch; demonstrate no popular mandate.

Two: America's subsequent barbaric “Shock and Awe” invasion of Iraq under the pretext of “preemptive self defense” to “save American lives” from “evil doers”, similar to Hitler's lies to attack Eastern Europe; General Colin Powell telling monumental lies in the UN with fake evidence and a straight face, following it seems, the advice of Mein Fuehrer: “The victor will not be asked afterward whether he told the truth or not. In starting and waging a war it is not the right that matters, but victory”, for victory was assured as the general knew they were going against a disarmed and non-existent threat; the “coalition of the willing” only as necessary as operation “canned goods” for domestic consumption only; the very gullible American public had to be shown that the entire world was united against the “evil doers”, it didn't matter that the world public knew this pretext to be fictitious; since the American public, unlike the German public, had already been deftly primed by the new Pearl Harbor of 9-11, it took even less convincing to attack Iraq than the German public to attack Poland; Colin Powell did not even choose to lie very cleverly - the desired impact of the hand waving with plagiarized fake evidence in the UN, in a dazzling corporate board room style slideshow prepared in Adobe Photoshop and Microsoft Presentation, had already accomplished its purpose better than Goebbels could have foreseen.

Three: Both having pre-advertised their intentions publicly for several years.

Four: Both military war machine leaders sharing the delusions of a “higher” moral prerogative – Hitler his “god given superiority of the fatherland and the Germanic race”, and George Bush Jr. his Evangelical Christian “crusade” of “Infinite Justice” to “save American lives” and bring on Jesus sooner. It is uncanny how often both have invoked divine mission in their speeches. What is the difference between them as perceived by many of their own delusional peoples during their leader's momentous rise to power?

Five: Both spinning propaganda and disinformation formally - Hitler through his Reichsminister for propaganda Dr. Joseph Goebbels, and George Bush through his coterie of seasoned mentors Paul Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Colin Powell, artfully generating disinformation and lies from the Pentagon and the State Department, with the corporate mainstream media faithfully reporting it ad nauseum as if these public airwaves were the exclusive propaganda arm of the Bush Administration.

Six: Both coerced the world into acquiescence – Hitler through August 31, 1939; and George Bush still as of today, as he murderously bombs Iraq while the world watches on television; While Hitler remained short sighted about September 1 and the Ides of March, the seasoned warriors advising Bush have done a remarkable job in eliminating that threat from the world scene by "either you are with us or with the terrorists", and the realities of post Cold War lone superpower eminence denied Hitler. But are the Ides of March ever inescapable?

Seven: It was the Jews blood being spilled by Christian Hitler, the "scourge of the Earth" [various anti-Semitic stereotypes purposely elided to not hurt feelings of the already victimized], so it was all right; now it is the Muslim blood being spilled by Christian George Bush Jr., the "new scourge of the Earth" belonging to the "very wicked and evil religion” according to their eminent Evangelical Christian leader Pat Robertson, so it is still all right; how did our oil get underneath their sand anyway – it must have seeped through from Alaska! In both cases, only the victims clamored for succor, with the rest of the world busy with their lives. The only difference being that after the Jewish Holocaust, the world had also vociferously vowed “never again” - and that is within living memory of many an American grandparent today.

And the major similarities don't just end there. Both also introduced similar measures to curb internal dissent. Hitler consolidated all police functions for the first time in German history, in 1936, as a prelude to the Nazi police state. George Bush Jr. pushed Congress to pass the oppressive Patriot Act 1 without debate, under the shock effect of 9-11, within a month of it, arguing that it was needed to find the “terrorists”. Another Patriot Act 2 awaits in the wings for an opportune moment, having already been circulated in Congress but not yet introduced. And then Bush proceeded to found the department of “Homeland Security”, also attempting to consolidate all the police functions of the American state, led by Tom Ridge, and elevated to the post of his Cabinet team.

Indeed, if the denizens of other nations were to point out to the American public that given so many similarities with the Third Reich, that whether the American nation too, with the emerging police state atmosphere inside America, was in the process of becoming the Fourth Reich, the American public would seethe with indignation at the mere thought of being equated with the Nazis!

They would rush to offer protestations that they are not out to conquer the world. That they are only bringing “democracy”, “good will”, and a “superior Christian civilization and love of Jesus” to the “lesser” unfortunate humanity, by getting rid of the ruthless tyrants that these unfortunate people could not rid themselves. The denizens of other nations would point out that the American public's inability to see the hypocrisy of their rather disingenuous affectations, how while they rose to fight Hitler for a similar offense of a “sense of superiority”, and the privilege of a “higher purpose”, now they don't see even their own descriptions of their actions in the same vein, is unequivocal evidence of either their diabolical complicity in the crimes against humanity, or their complete indoctrination, similar to the German public in the Third Reich!

In Plato's allegory of chained prisoners dwelling in an underground cave, who are kept in perpetual ignorance through sophisticated image manipulation, the prisoners have little choice in their course of actions. They are chained by their necks at birth until they die, forced to look only straight ahead, and forced to live underground by the fascist dictatorship of their unelected and imposed controllers. If these controllers committed crimes on another people somewhere outside the cave, the chained prisoners would be powerless to stop them even if they were to become aware of those crimes by seeing them on the screens in front of them. Hence the prisoners could not be held accountable for those crimes even when they knew about them.

Based on my personal experience of living in America for almost a quarter century, and the reality of what has transpired since 9-11, it may be convincingly argued that Plato's analogy of mass ignorance is quite apropos when applied to the American public. Indeed, I would not be entirely remiss if I were to abstract the following assertions:

The vast majority of mainstream peace loving people in the United States of America are systematically deceived by their rulers. All they see and experience is the reality synthesized for them by the image makers on their television screens, much like the chained dwellers in Plato's mythical underground cave. They are kept ignorant and self absorbed to willingly submit to their rulers without the need for the cage of ruthless totalitarianism. Invisibly chained, prisoners of the cave, a perfect fraud committed to keep them happily towing their leader's line, as the State embarks on an imperial war of global conquest disguised as “war on terrorism”, and the American public oblige with “United We Stand”

But unlike Plato's chained prisoners in the underground cave, the American public lives in a democracy aboveground, and not in a cave! They enjoy considerable power over their elected government, and substantial personal freedoms and constitutionally guaranteed civil rights. If they are ignorant of the crimes of their government, either through their own inadvertence - too busy chasing their “American Dreams” - or through the Machiavellian machinations of their institutional ruling elite that indoctrinated them with false patriotism and "false flag operations", can they still morally claim the “I didn't know defense”?

If they were to discover that there might be even the slightest possibility that they are being deliberately kept ignorant of reality, then what should their responsibility be?

The author, an ordinary researcher and writer on contemporary geopolitics, a minor justice activist, grew up in Pakistan, studied EECS at MIT, engineered for a while in high-tech Silicon Valley (patents here), and retired early to pursue other responsible interests. His maiden 2003 book was rejected by six publishers and can be read on the web at http://PrisonersoftheCave.org. He may be reached at http://Humanbeingsfirst.org.

Copyright Notice:

Copyright (c) Zahir Ebrahim, with full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety, unmodified and unedited, for any purpose, granted, provided the URL sentence and this copyright notice are also reproduced verbatim as part of this license, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All quotations and excerpts are based on non-profit "fair use" in the greater public interest consistent with the understanding of laws noted at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. Full copyright notice and Exclusions at http://www.humanbeingsfirst.org.

All material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety, unmodified, for any purpose, granted, provided the full URL sentence and the copyright notice contained within each Document are also reproduced verbatim as part of this license, along with any embedded links within its main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All figures, images, quotations, and excerpts are used without permission based on non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research use only in the greater public interest. The usage is minimally consistent with the understanding of laws noted at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”. Exclusion: All rights are expressly reserved for the usage of the terms (c) HumanbeingsfirstTM and (c) HumanbeingfirstTM which are the copyrighted and trademarked intellectual property of Project HumanbeingsfirstTM. Reproduction Note: It is acceptable to reproduce any document in smaller serialized parts provided the full URL sentence and the copyright notice within each document are also reproduced in each part and the entire document is reproduced. Please read http://humanbeingsfirst.org/#Legal-Disclaimer-Notice.

Please be advised that Project HumanbeingsfirstTM fully cooperates with all law enforcement and other governmental agencies worldwide in rooting out Terrorism in all its nuanced shades and stripes in order to end its Neanderthal reign of terror upon all who are human beings first. Project Humanbeingsfirst does not distinguish between terrorists clad in turbans and those wearing suits, nor between the predatory rampages of the pirates vs. the emperors, albeit each is apportioned the measure of crime and guilt commensurate to their respective station of power and impact on their victims. Law enforcement personnel worldwide, but especially in the United States and the West, are encouraged to participate with Project Humanbeingsfirst. It is essential for all nations' state security apparatus to learn how to forensically identify the monumental supreme terrorists hiding in plain sight among us under legal cover, the real merchants of death, while they dutifully chase down the easy to spot handful of often deliberately manufactured pirates at sea.

“ISIS
rampage through northern Iraq a staged event; special forces
integrated within the terror brigades; U.S. supporting both sides;
transformation of countries into territories: Sunni Caliphate,
Independent Kurdistan, Shia Arab Republic; Iran being sucked into
conflict; water wars; long-term U.S. geopolitical objectives.”

What
Michel Chossudovsky did not address in that interview is the
overarching agenda behind the piece-meal “transformation of
countries into territories” out of once sovereign
nation-states, which were themselves carved out of long running
empires in the last century: fabricating World
Government.

“BAGHDAD — Confronting the threat of civil war in Iraq, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry flew to Baghdad on Monday to personally urge the Shiite-led government to give more power to political opponents before a Sunni insurgency seizes more control across the country and sweeps away hopes for lasting peace. The meeting scheduled between Kerry and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki was not expected to be friendly, given that officials in Washington have floated suggestions that the Iraqi premier should resign as a necessary first step toward quelling the vicious uprising. Nor will it likely bring any immediate, tangible results, as al-Maliki has shown no sign of leaving and Iraqi officials have long listened to — but ultimately ignored — U.S. advice to avoid appearing controlled by the decade-old specter of an American occupation in Baghdad.”

Capish?

The Big Lie

There
are mainly two global schools of thought today on what transpired on
September 11, 2001. The first says evil Muslims under the leadership
of Osama Bin Laden and an organization called Al-Qaeda, principally
carried out that catastrophic terror act on American soil. Minor
variations salt that narrative spanning the gamut of plausible
sounding arguments from anticipated blowback of iniquitous global
policies of the superpower to conspiratorial covert blessings and/or
active collusion of the Western intelligence apparatuses, including
that of the United States, Israel, Pakistan and others. The majority
of the world's officialdoms, and the public mind, have accepted the
unsalted version. Today that narrative advanced by the superpower and
its surrogates underwrites history books, law books, policy
prescriptions, fine literature, and even melodrama as an accepted
historical fact. The salted variations mainly sell books. The second
school of thought says that the entire first narrative can be nothing
but a Big Lie and all its salted versions deliberate red herrings
which principally serve to sanctify the Big Lie. This article
underwrites the latter argument by advancing the logic method known
as reductio ad absurdum on empirical evidence. It is a rational
method used in court systems worldwide which any ordinary man and
woman of sound mind capable of serving for jury duty can employ on
their own to separate fact from fiction. No judge dare reject this
forensic technique unless he is running a kangaroo court --- which is
perhaps why no legal mind has to date dared to bring this most
straightforward argument before the International Criminal Court
System in the Hague despite all their vocal dissent as the brilliant
consciences of the world. It is the one sure-fire proof of the Big
Lie that can immediately lead to sleeping with the fishes for anyone
presenting it with any effective measure of legal visibility. That
crucial omission is the veritable indicator of the self-serving moral
corruption of the finest intellectual minds today, or when innocent
of that charge, perhaps their complete indoctrination. The global
impact of this co-option is that the Big Lie of the twenty-first
century is rapidly getting sanctified as “whole truth”
with no moral giants (or even midgets) effectively standing in its
way.

The
world has been reduced to a fully controlled chaos solely
based on that one principal axiomatic Big Lie of 9/11 – that
Muslim terrorists wielding Militant Islam attacked America.

The
craft of propaganda based on the Big Lie perfected by Adolph Hitler,
but not invented by him, has the public mind today accepting
absurdities upon absurdities, and consequently easily acquiescing to
atrocities inflicted upon others as well as upon themselves by the
global superstate in the making, in the name of protecting the
world's public from terrorists. Just witnessing what is transpiring
at American
Airports
must make the nation's founders weep profusely in their grave.

Dismantle
that one Big Lie and it all comes crashing down. Which is why the
American president asserts don't challenge it! And Americans,
scholars and laity alike, comply. Do these handful of ubermensch
liars trying to orchestrate global governance with global
war-mongering, full spectrum propaganda systems, and in full control
of key levers of power of Western states which puts Western
militaries and Western budgets at their free disposal, think that
Muslims have none among them today who can stand up to their Big Lie?
Would they rather that we all lie down and submit quietly like the
self-serving house niggers they are used to from the era of
the East India Company?

This analysis is submitted
to MIT Technology Review and MIT Spectrum magazines
as an alum submission, of how scientists and scholars today subvert
both science and religion in the service of empire no differently
than they did in the Third Reich. Perhaps that does not happen at
MIT? Then surely MIT Technology Review would
print this article to demonstrate how we live in a free society where
this does not and cannot happen among MIT scientists and professors
of engineering training its next generation of scientists and
engineers. Also submitted to the Bulletin of the Atomic
Scientists,IEEE magazine, The Chronicle of Higher Education.
I further intend to send this in personal email to all living Nobel
Laureates. You are invited to send this to your alma mater newspaper,
to discuss it in your classroom, and to counter it with your most
scholarly aptitude. Give it your best shot! Unless this analysis is
brought into the corridors of mainstream science and social science,
it will remain stillborn, preaching mainly to the choir. Please lend
a hand. Send it to your local newspapers. Let the scholars of empire
in every nation refute it. That will only happen when it is published
in mainstream.

It
is the work of William Cooper, author of that incredible book:
Behold_a_Pale_Horse, which I had read a while back, but now, based on
all that I have learnt over the years, I might read again. The PDF of
the book can be downloaded from that website as well. Behold a Pale
Horse had confirmed to me many things which earlier authors whom I
quote from often had written about, including Carroll Quigley, Bill
Clinton's professor at Georgetown whom the incoming President after
winning the elections in 1992, or was it after winning the Primaries
at the Democratic Convention I forget, had credited as having
influenced him greatly in his political development, etc. Carroll
Quigley, part of the establishment and most respected teacher of
generations of American diplomats groomed at Georgetown University's
famous School of Foreign Service (
http://sfs.georgetown.edu/careers/prominent/
), had blown the lid of the drive towards world government in his
1966 twelve hundred page book Tragedy and Hope, which I have read.

The
disturbing thing here is that what some of us have discovered on our
own based on our own due diligence from source materials, and our own
forensic analysis commonsensically putting it all together, is not
only substantiated to some extent, but what this article indicates is
that we have barely scratched the surface of how deep the rabbit hole
goes --- a lot of the stuff in here I have no idea is true or false.

The
article covers a very vast canvass. If anything is known to be false
in it, please let me know. Note that it is always harder to prove
things true, but far easier to falsify. Basic fact-checks can often
reveal falsehoods easily, for instance. But truth is often difficult
to "prove". This philosophical fact of the matter even
forms the basis of the famous Occam's razor principle in science to
construct what is called the scientific process. It is used to
formulate the bare minimum and simplest possible axioms necessary for
theorizing empiricism; assumptions or statements which cannot be
proved to be true, but are presumed to be true with the possibility
of falsification. The scientific axioms in the scientific process are
held to be true until shown to be false. Precisely because proving
the “truth” on fundamental fronts is always harder and
often borders on beliefs.

The
difference between that and religion is singular – religion
permits no falsification of its axioms, but scientific axioms are in
fact contingent on their being falsifiable. And once deemed false,
the axioms are abandoned, or circumscribed to their applicable limits
as warranted. So far, everything I have punched into Google, or
wikipedia from this article bears out that very point out --- that
the “truth” of the matter cannot easily be proved on the
topic at hand: the scientific evidence of America's landing of man on
the moon in 1969 has not been preserved for any third party to
adjudicate the claims of the United States Government as underwritten
by its organization NASA (see below). Therefore, in its absence, the
claims can only be falsified, unless that claim borders on religious
faith! Is the belief in America's manned mission to moon in Apollo 11
a religion? And conversely, is disbelief in that narrative another
religion? For a scientist passionate about his search for truth and
inquiry, neither of these can be true.

Thus
we, as passionate scientists, both as hard scientists of physical
sciences, and as social scientists fully cognizant of all modalities
of social engineering, proceed in examining the available empirical
evidence with the fewest possible axioms none of which must hinge
upon faith and belief in officialdom, or in its detractors' atheism.
And therein the real difficulty commences:

What
is empirical data on which we make observations – how do we
define data?

Is
it data that is born from official narratives?

Is
it data that is recovered from declassified documents?

Is
it the data that is easily accessible to scientists so that the
scientific method can be applied to it?

At
some point in that process of defining what is data, and specifically
when data is not directly generated by the observing scientist, nor
directly accessible to him, nor directly reproducible by him, axioms
must come into play. Axioms that are reasonable assumptions and
falsifiable. When this data impinges on social engineering however, a
fuzzy “trust” factor gets coupled to the construction of
the axiom, such as trust in government, trust in its institutions,
trust in its authority figures that they don't lie, all of which have
the tendency to induce group-think which is more akin to religious
beliefs than to falsifiable scientific axioms.

For
instance, on the CIA memo reproduced by Cooper which speaks of using
UFO/Aliens mantra for psychological warfare, a topic which I have
analyzed and written about and reached exactly the same conclusions
as independently reached by the article and confirmed by that CIA
memo, I wondered who this Walter B. Smith, Director of CIA was. And O
boy, wikipedia has a very intriguing bio such that the memo signed by
him is entirely believable. But did General Walter Bedell Smith of
the United States Army, as the Director of CIA between 1950 and 1953,
indeed write such a memo which bears his name for secret
communication or for later public consumption as a limited hangout?
If the former, why on earth was it ever declassified and released to
the public? This memo directly substantiates, for instance, all that
I analyzed and concluded here a few years ago:
http://humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/p/alien-agenda.html

1.
I am today transmitting to the National Security Council a proposal
(TAB A) in which it is concluded that the problems connected with
unidentified flying objects appear to have implications for
psychological warfare as well as for intelligence and operations.

2.
The background for this view is presented in some detail in TAB B.

3.
I suggest that we discuss at an early board meeting the possible
offensive or defensive utilization of these
phenomena for psychological warfare
purposes.

Walter
B. Smith

Director

What
the CIA memo's careful wording does not say is admit that the
intelligence apparatus is itself constructing the flying saucers
phenomena. But we already know even that to be true from the images
of experimental flying aircraft built by NASA to look like UFOs and
bearing US Air Force insignia from my aforementioned report.

Indeed,
the long departed Director of CIA confirmed my analysis by writing
this memo and the United States government again confirmed it by
releasing it, as does this article by Cooper. But Cooper confirming
it is one thing. Why would that intelligence agency want to lend
confirmation to the world of what the skeptics have argued time and
again that a mind-fck is in progress and also identified exactly its
purpose, to cement world government? The fact that they are so full
of hubris, that even smart people putting 2+2=4 together cannot
really bother their cause, just like Carroll Quigley stated, that
nothing can derail the drive to world government because a lot of it
is already in place long before it was unveiled, but, even when it
can matter, they can easily put anyone to sleep with the fishes ---
William Cooper was shot to death by the cops in an "encounter"!

Who
is to formally define for a society who is a bigger patriot: those
who challenge the abuse of power or those who assist in that abuse?
It is as convenient today to dehumanize, marginalize, and idiotisize
the inconvenient patriot in order to get rid of him as yesterday. And
to ensure that his memory also remains soiled among the masses, as a
friend responding to this letter observed: “Interesting to note
that the Wikipedia page on Cooper is grossly misleading in that it
majors on his alleged belief in UFO's and extra-terrestrials as a
reality, with no mention of the fact – as evidenced in this
article - that he regards the phenomena are major tools in a vast
hidden reality perception/mind control program. The page is protected
and it is not possible to edit it without obtaining permission from
its gatekeepers - why was I not surprised?”

Wikispooks,
an alternative to Wikipedia for topics where the latter lends more
sympathetic treatment to establishment's narratives and marginalizes
the detractors, has a page dedicated to this topic with enough study
links to keep insomniacs busy for quite a while (and it has sure
taken up many hours of my leisure time on this most patriotic of
weekends, the Memorial Day holiday in the United States of America):
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Moon_Landings_Hoax

Similarly,
the discussion of moon-landing in Cooper's article is interesting in
that same context, of principally enabling and legitimizing the story
of Aliens can land on earth .... It had not ever occurred to me to
think that way that moon landing could be faked, and I used to
dismiss all these flat-earth society skeptics of "small step for
man, giant leap for mankind” bit as fringe lunatics --- but
based on my meagre understanding of physics, which isn't beyond
college level taught in electrical engineering at MIT in course 8 and
course 6, even if I could remember any of it, I cannot immediately
see the flaw in the presentation by William Cooper. Can you?

But
what is more disturbing is that such a Big Lie, if it is so, like
9/11, can stand among the world's physicists!

So
I am sure this explanation must be wrong --- please show me where it
is wrong... my mind stopped practicing physics beyond 9th-10th grade
level after 9/11 when "bad Muslims" broke all the laws of
physics with their terrorism of taking out the WTC towers.

Open Letter to Noam Chomsky

Hello.
I am writing this open letter to you both as your former student at
MIT who got at least some of his inspiration to stand up to the
narratives of power from your considerable teachings, and on account
of your being a public intellectual influencing public opinion
worldwide and therefore also accountable to the public for your
opinions.

I
have made the following unpleasant observations in my
article
and which I continue in this letter. I would like to ask for your
response. Unless you claim intellectual unaccountability and no
personal responsibility for influencing public opinion, and such a
gross charge surely will never be justly laid upon you as a
responsible teacher and moral guide of the American peoples, I would
like to request a public rebuttal.

'...
This is how and why the most prominent moral detractor of his own
American nation today, Professor Noam Chomsky of MIT, for instance,
gets anointed “arguably the most important intellectual
alive” by the empire's own mouthpiece, the New York Times.
This intellectual who boldly teaches others the responsibilities of
intellectual, rehearses at great length in his prolific writings past
crimes and past lies of the American empire for which nothing much
can be done today. But for matters current affairs not fully driven
to their intended fait accompli, such as the imperial mobilization to
world government under the catastrophic terror event of September 11,
2001 as pretext, and which can effectively be derailed in a public
chain reaction if the most prominent intellectuals of America boldly
stood up and called the Big Lie for what it is, Dr. Noam
Chomsky assiduously totes the establishment's own absurd line on who
dunnit. The fine moral intellectual shows no inclination to challenge
the imperial core lie whatsoever. Instead, strangely for someone
billed as the most important dissenting intellectual, finds specious
arguments to support the empire's core lie. His stock following of
dissenting rebels, as well as other nations who look up to him for
guidance, lap it up convinced that when the most strident detractor
of empire also agrees with the empire's blaming of 9/11 exclusively
on Islamofascist terrorist, then it must be so.

This highly
venerated scholar of America known throughout the world as America's
left-liberal conscience, whose many books sell worldwide just with
his brand name affixed to them, and even get waived from the high
podium of the United Nations by presidential figurine condemning the
excesses of American hegemony, also behaved in an analogously
unforgivable manner when president John F. Kennedy was assassinated.
The brilliant moralist of America, employed for lifetime in America's
most prominent high technology educational institution which gets
virtually all of its research funding and operating budget from
America's vast military-industrial complex as the natural extension
of the American national security state, had, at the very inception
of his scholarly career, dutifully parroted the establishment's
absurd narrative of the “lone gun-man” dunnit.

At
that time in the 1960s and 1970s, just as in this generation in the
aftermath of 9/11, the American public was in great moral angst to
learn who really was responsible for that catastrophic terrorism on
their beloved soil. The public behavior was fully controlled by the
state's full spectrum control of the narrative then, just as it is
today. It was accomplished then, just as it is today, with copious
help from the full gamut of manufactured respectability from left to
right. All intellectuals echoed the core narrative of empire then,
just as they do today when it is of utmost urgency to immediately
analyze, question, and publicly challenge the dubiousness of state
narratives before the hidden motivations behind the crime get fully
actualized into fait accompli by the public's acceptance of the core
narrative.

The public's easy acceptance of any tortuous past
without any great pangs of guilt, as well as any abhorrent present
without any great murmur of protest, with the Superman
intellectuals of empire engineering both consent and dissent to
govern the public mind, is the brilliant success of Mephistopheles
in mass behavior control.'

Professor
Chomsky, as a teacher of US foreign policy and expert
in political theories behind statecraft, you cannot be unaware that
echoing of the core lies of the state while critiquing its effects,
is explained by political science most perceptively. The endeavor is
highly utilitarian, as you can see, since it remains ineffective in
derailing imperial mobilization when the core pretext and core lies
are kept intact. That kind of dissent principally serves the
continual enabling of imperial mobilization very well while retaining
the necessary illusions of free speech and advanced democracy which
constitutionally tolerates dissent.

This
worked in extending the Vietnam War then, when the focus was
cunningly put off by the incoming administration from the national
security state being the first likely
criminal to have so successfully subverted the presidential security
detail which enabled president Kennedy's assassination – an
impossibility for America under the Cold War calculus of intense
security without the requisite means, motive, and opportunity which
only the national security state can bring to bear. And it worked
today when the focus is once again most cunningly put off from the
national security state having the means, motive, and opportunity to
covertly execute “operation canned goods” on September
11, 2001 and believably blame the catastrophic terrorism on
controlled patsies suitably duped for that purpose.

No
one who has studied the history of the
Third Reich, and the detailed narratives of the Nuremberg Military
Tribunals as well as you have Professor Chomsky, and I know this
first hand because we have in the past communicated on the topic of
victor's justice, can remain so naïvely uninformed of the
political utility of self-inflicted terror. Especially when it openly
and most visibly launches the most barbaric imperial mobilization
using it as the pretext, and against all intellectual and rational
sense of international as well as criminal law.

What
is the explanation? The only reasonable one that any prosecuting
attorney would put forth is that the moral agent is a covert asset of
empire. I find this conclusion most distasteful. I hope that is not
the case.

Irrespective
of that determination, because of your public stance, you are partly
responsible for all the evil which follows in the imperial
mobilization from that retention of core lies, as your own humble
contribution to the making of the public mind. Of course, only
according to measure. That measure to which you are accountable, and
no more than that, is what I ask you to account for publicly in the
public interest. A Robert H. Jackson today, right alongside imperial
scholars manufacturing consent as the propaganda philosophers of the
new Reich, would surely also be prosecuting imperial scholars
manufacturing dissent as its covert agents. The precise observations
he might make is what I have made. Which any sensible person ought to
make.

For
writing this bold and unusual open letter and requesting a public
response, I offer no apologies. You
misguided dissent by your egregious omission to standup to the Big
Lie as per your own self-proclaimed responsibility of
intellectuals because of which people looked up to you. You thus
directly prolonged the Big
Lie which also accrues more evil
to your own account! My peoples, Muslims, have been
mercilessly killed worldwide in the multiplicative
effects of imperial mobilization by your willfully continuing to
retain the core lie that it was “militant Islam” and
“OBL” that successfully invaded the armed to the teeth
sole superpower on 9/11 instead of the national security state with
collusion of its surrogates. Thus you express no real dissent with
the core axioms of imperial power while speciously pretending to do
so by protesting its wars. Exactly similar to your previous retention
of the state's core fable in the Kennedy assassination
while protesting the Vietnam War with considerable vigor. In both
cases, if I recall correctly, you hath even proclaimed that what does
it matter who dunnit, to minimize any real questioning of the
official narratives and to keep focus on protesting their effects
instead, the wars themselves.

The
common behavior patterns only spell calculated behavior in the eyes
of a good public prosecutor, and not one of mere happenstance,
especially for a Superman who proclaims: “It is the
responsibility of intellectuals to speak the truth and to expose
lies” (Responsibility of Intellectuals). And: “the
responsibility of a writer as a moral agent is to try to bring the
truth about matters of human significance to an audience that can do
something about them.” (Power and Prospects).

Perhaps
you were thinking of some other audience and not your own American
public enjoying the constitutional liberties which permitted them
dissent and free speech? If so, please state so that this is why,
instead of bringing the American peoples the truth and exposing lies,
you brought them the core narratives of power commencing from the
immediate aftermath of 9/11 no differently than that “vulgar
propagandist” whom you so anointed (in an interview to Evan
Solomon, CBC, December 9, 2003), Professor Bernard Lewis of Princeton
University. As a result of this incestuously self-reinforcing
“truth-telling” in which both the empire's officialdom
and its finest detractors echo each other, you can explain to the
American people that now even if they wanted to, they could no longer
make a difference because the United States today is a legally
sanctioned police-state. You can continue to critique that effect
too, the police-state, just as you do America's hegemony, but by not
questioning the Big Lie when it was timely to do so, you also
played your role in enabling police-state USA.

Indeed,
not just arguably, for there is no need for that caveat, you are the
most important intellectual alive for power that runs America.

Awaiting
your forceful reply, the strongest of rebuttals, explaining once
again to the public mind the responsibility of intellectuals as moral
agents and under what conditions should they echo the core narratives
of empire. It is a lesson you omitted to teach at MIT when I had the
pleasure of being a mostly silent student in your off-beat foreign
policy classes. Then, the brave Americans talked a lot, and I mostly
listened, shyly, as a foreign student coming from Gen. Zia ul Haq's
police-state that had just hanged its elected civilian prime-minister
with America's blessings; arguably quite dazzled by all this
intellectualism of boldly confronting the lies and villainy of power
being so openly taught in America as the beacon of advanced democracy
to the rest of the world. I had to subsequently learn of Machiavelli
and the Hegelian Dialectic of Dissent as the two most essential tunes
of the Mighty Wurlitzer for an advanced democracy to function, on my
own.

Sanctifying the 9/11 Narrative vs. the Holocaust

"Holocaust
denial is illegal in only 17 countries, most of which are in Europe
... So though the actual number of countries that have criminalized
revisionist history isn’t overwhelming by any means, the
importance of the outlawing is. Because of it, history is still held
hostage to power." --- Lila Rajiva

While
the last sentence in the statement above by American rebel
extraordinaire of Indian origin, Lila
Rajiva, is a truism; and the first sentence captures a monumental
crime against the intellect which even surpasses the supreme crime of
the Hellenic Civilization, the hemlock administered to Socrates; and
while a fait accompli cannot (practically) be reversed once
generations grow up in any sanctified narrative, the more pertinent
issue for any generation is the sanctification of a narrative in the
present tense.

That
narrative of the present tense one can always do something about
before it gets fully sanctified as public religion and new
generations grow up believing and naturally resisting any tampering
with their core beliefs. More psychologically potent the belief, and
more its political utility, more the indoctrination systems get
established in society to inculcate and promulgate
those beliefs, and more the resistance of hoi polloi mind to altering
it with fact-check, analysis, empiricism, and all left-half brain
oriented logical synthesis and deconstruction – because, the
right-half brain dominates when faith, religion, dogma, and beliefs
are brought into question. That has been recognized not just by the
clergy from time immemorial, but by both Machiavelli and Superman.

In
our generation, it is the pious sanctification of the 9/11 who dunnit
narrative now in brazen progress.

This
is how the incumbent president of the United States of America, the
unchallenged and preeminent armed to the
teeth sole superpower on earth, takes over the continued construction
of the Big Lie from where his predecessor first mobilized it into a
full blown World War IV: President
Obama warns not to challenge the official narrative of 9/11

Image
Caption Watch President Obama making the Big Lie sacrosanct. See full Analysis

'I
am aware that there is still some who would question, or even justify
the offense of 911.

But
let us be clear. Al Qaeeda killed nearly 3000 people on that day.

The
victims were innocent men, women, and children from America and many
other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody.

And
yet Al Qaeeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit
for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a
massive scale. They have affiliates in many countries, to try to
expand their reach.

These
are not opinions to be debated. These are facts to be dealt with.'
--- President Obama, Cairo Egypt, June 4th 2009

That
is the new core narrative, the imperially asserted by fiat “facts
to be dealt with”, the sacrosanct Big Lie of empire which has
singularly enabled its own far greater “imperial mobilization”
to a far greater Lebensraum, the whole of earth for one-world
government.

And
the most revealing thing is to perceptively note who else is
participating in the Big Lie in making it sacrosanct right alongside
the vulgar propagandists of empire all of whom, by the standards
already established by the Allies joint Military Tribunal at
Nuremberg for hanging the Nazi propagandists and war-mongers, would
also hang without folly. It is a new breed of philosophers not known
to exist in Nazi Germany, and carefully manufactured since then.

It
is the breed of propagandists who appear to be preeminent dissenters
in the advanced democracies of the West, but who echo the same core
narrative of the Big Lie as the vulgar propagandists of empire.

Virtually
all such chiefs, I would argue before any War Crimes Tribunal that
would be bold enough to try the first group, are no different. They
are merely two sides of the same imperial coin – to
diabolically engineer the public mind in the service of the exercise
of imperial power which would otherwise not be possible among a
people not popularly imbued with the spirit of la mission
civilisatrice.

The
dissent-chiefs equally serve to deceive their own constituency - the
rare public mind among hoi polloi that exhibits an ounce of moral
gravitas and refuses to accept the mainstream propaganda fare easily
accepted by the rest of hoi polloi.

Such
minds were easily annihilated or silenced in the Third Reich where
there were no pretenses of advanced democracy to be up held. Nazi
Socialism had decreed a divine master plan for the fatherland.
Whereas the dissent rebels are permitted to exist in its replacement
that must maintain the illusion of freedom of speech, of dissent, and
of advanced democracy in action which permits vigorous debate as the
beacon of Western civilization to the rest of the world.

In
Dante's conception of his Inferno, I would argue that they deserve to
be in the lowest and innermost circle of hell - because, they are the
most villainous in their deception and deceit. They contribute to the
successful sanctification of the Big Lie while pretending to be great
moralists among the very audience who have the willingness and moral
gravitas to endeavor in abolishing the deception and look up to these
Superman for moral guidance.

This
is a most distinguished group of sanctifiers indeed. Today, all of
them echo in exact synchronicity, the who dunnit sacrosanct axiom of
9/11, while they boldly dissent with the exercise of hegemony that
stems directly from upholding that sacred axiom.

Because
of them, this new sacred narrative of 9/11 now under sanctification
during our own lifetime, will create endless generations believing
the Big Lie. And because of it, condemning Islam and Muslims --- the
following graph is intended to set the stage for it, which is why it
was made available so diligently to the public:

I
will take the bet that within a few years, this Jews led dominant
narrative of 9/11 which has seeded World War IV, like the HolocaustTM
seeded in World War II, will become 9/11TM.

Not
just 17 nations, but all nation-flags of the world in world
government, will make it illegal to question that enabling Big Lie
that brought global governance and global police-state to the new
global Lebensraum.

When
a narrative is sanctified, not just culturally, but also legally with
specific entitlements to the state penitentiary or to St. Elizabeth
for blasphemy against it, then, irrespective of what that narrative
is, an iron curtain outlasting generations is diabolically lowered
around the public mind from which a civilization or society simply
cannot escape. What can be a greater crime against humanity than that
-- enslaving for eons, generations in false beliefs, which in turn
inform and govern their public and private behavior.

As
already stated, while for the previous sanctifications of history
nothing substantial or pragmatic can be done today as the powers that
benefit from its sanctification are all ubiquitous, omnipotent, and
omniscient, always proclaiming that “absence of evidence is not
evidence of absence” with a straight face, and that perhaps is
the only arguable justification brought to bear on the sacrosanctness
of HolocaustTM (as the extensive public evidence compiled
at http://ihr.org
overwhelmingly substantiates), for the present day 9/11 narrative
that has still not quite become TM, its fait accompli can still be
interdicted.

Unfortunately,
those able to do so with the most potency and practicalness, are
already in the class to be held in the court abbey in iron chains if
an absolute standard of moral justice ever prevails. No such standard
is visible in political reality although
always in lip-service as needed. While the surviving Nazi leadership
was condemned to hang by Robert H. Jackson, the prominent chief
prosecuting counsel for the United States and justice of US Supreme
court, brilliantly declaring to them and to the war-weary world
watching in 1946 the absolute standard of justice upon which they
were being sentenced to death and not in victor's justice:

“If
certain acts of violation of treaties are crimes, they are crimes
whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them, and
we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against
others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us.”
;

immediately
thereafter, in 1951, Justice Vinson of the US Supreme Court, declared
the following:

“Nothing
is more certain in modern society than the principle that there are
no absolutes, that a name, a phrases, a standard has meaning only
when associated with the considerations which give birth to
nomenclature. To those who would paralyze our Government in the face
of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we
must reply that all concepts are relative.”

Flushed
with unassailable hubris on being on the side of empire in its core
Big Lies, the murderers today, their aiders and abettors, assistant
stooges and dupes, whether engineering consent or dissent, all well
understand that: “All murderers are punished unless they kill
in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets.”

Since
all ideas are relative as already boldly
proclaimed by the highest court in the reigning sole superpower, but
which is of course also always true in practice (with or without
declaration) for every king in every kingdom, they each understand
that no one can even plausibly hang them for their measure of
participating in propaganda and war crimes by echoing the Big Lie
alongside the emperor. They know that today, there is no power
greater than the emperor's to pursue them even in some wishful
victor's justice. Secure in that knowledge, it is safe to be a
propagandist of any flavor on any side of the coin – take
whichever position you like based on your psychological disposition,
natural talent, skill, and egotistical
gratification.

See
this open letter to their most prominent and respected leader -
Goebbells' direct counterpart Machiavellianly manipulating the
dissenting minority of hoi polloi by echoing the Big Lie underneath
all the protestations of the already visible barbarianism of
hegemony:

There
are many more to expose. You know who you are --- and so do hoi
polloi reading this.

There
really does not seem to exist anyone today who is also a somebody,
who would boldly pick up the real gauntlet of moral integrity as the
true moral agent in the public's service --- all only pay lip service
to morality, to the responsibility of the writer as a moral agent,
with a herd of hoi polloi following each one.

For
every one whom they deceived, there is an innermost sanctum reserved
in Dante's Inferno.

Not
much good such immanent feelings of justice do today as new
narratives are sanctified for future history and future revisionists,
right before our very eyes --- and as unknowns, nobodies, without
institutional level resources and organizational backing, there is
nothing the rag-tag band of foolish rebels can do except to
pathetically continue to shout in futility from their respective
Speakers Corner in the new Hyde Park, the internet.

The
Superman and hoi polloi both perceptively understand
that reality of the full futility of challenging the narrative from
the Speaker's Corner. Which is why, the pragmatic maxim: if you can't
beat them, join 'em, guides most anyone who has even an ounce of
pragmaticism left in them. Let God take care of the rest.

I
don't know why that maxim continues to fail on the handful of rebels,
the mal contents however. The last of the breed of songbirds on earth
whom legal entitlements alone, if not the continued impracticability
of their endeavor, will eventually finish them off as some appendage
of antiquity:

“Live
a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not
care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the
virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you
should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will
be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the
memories of your loved ones.” --- Live a good life

And
I pray they do continue to exist against all odds, and continue to do
so, inspired by their own natural inner
moral compass woefully denied the great Superman moral agents of
empire.

The Dying Songbird

The
whole aim of practical politics of dissent by genuine gadflies to
power is to prevent the future fait accompli that is being engineered
by 'history's actors' in the present. This is why genuine dissent,
that with real teeth and non-zero efficacy, cannot be permitted to
exist and flourish. It is instead replaced with manufactured dissent
as an essential part of statecraft itself when the illusion of
dissent and public opinion is to be maintained in a 'free' democratic
society.

Rehearsing
crimes of power after these crimes are fait accompli; after all the
barbers in town already know it; after their disclosure as the
narrative of official history through FOIA declassification,
whistle-blowing and deep-throat leaks, and in posthumous confessional
diaries of monumental war criminals, none of which really reveal any
real secrets, or only do so ex post facto when it is already a fait
accompli; is either the job of the professional historian who relies
on officialdom to write the official history pre-sanctioned by power
by what it chooses to document and what it chooses to make-believe to
posterity, or of manufactured dissent!

Let
the twain: a genuine intellectual gadfly vs. fabricated dissent and
its useful idiots, not be confused with each other!

The
latter is the Superman who echoes the axioms of power underneath his
supercilious dissent with it, or tells the obvious truth ex post
facto, both to the applause of the instruments of power itself, while
collecting all the well-intentioned activists and consciences around
him. He is the collection-agent of power. His con-job is to ensure
that dissent does not stray too far from home. The world is full of
the latter, a modern necessity to complement the manufacturing of
consent; to cunningly constrain dissent within acceptable limits when
dissent is permitted in a 'free' society.

This
brilliant Superman herdsman often comes anointed with super advanced
degrees, titles, accolades, is well-published, most cited, and speaks
with an MIT, Harvard or Oxford accent. He is as powerful in his
dissenting “United We Stand” message to his tiny herd as
the Superman orator is in his “United We Stand” message
to the mainstream herd. The Superman herdsman of dissent is the more
brilliant twin in the Hegelian Dialectic of manufactured consent vs.
manufactured dissent.

Imperial Surrogates and 'Terror Central' in Operation Gladio Redux

A
country at war and unable to defend itself because it is unwilling to
identify that insurgents are just another military division of state
actors themselves, the surrogate army, masquerading as non-state
actor rebels autonomously waging fourth-gen warfare --- That is the
GREAT PRETENCE of our uncle toms and traitors!

This
article continues my previous analysis of understanding Operation
Gladio of yesteryear
as the template for perceptively understanding worldwide terror today
similarly being inflicted from continent to continent by well-trained
Western surrogates disguised in Islamofascist uniforms and blamed on
Islamofascist patsies
to similarly keep fueling World War IV. For the perceptive readers,
my Report on The
Mighty Wurlitzer is sufficient to comprehend both the
why and how
“militant Islam” has been made the dominant narrative of
empire. In this article I focus on the “Terror Central”,
Pakistan. The latest spate of terror attack, this time in my own city
Islamabad, on March 03, 2014, which took the life of a young lawyer,
Fizza Malik, and ten others, and the responsibility for it claimed by
yet another manufactured terror network fancifully labeled Ahrarul
Hind, which is stated to have phoned in its message to Pakistan's
largest English language news daily, Dawn, cannot be overcome by
merely continuing on with the core narratives of empire.

The
Pakistani intellectual must rise to challenge, ab initio, the entire
concept of terrorism beyond the accepted narratives spinned by the
Pakistani media and opinion-makers of all stripes. Those who
give any damn about this nation at all, even an iota's worth, must
carefully examine the behind the scenes motivation which
fundamentally drive worldwide terrorism today, of which Pakistan is a
crucial link. Those with any power to do so must forcefully wrest
control of the narrative from the agents, assets, and sayanim of
empire who deny Pakistan's public any conception of these diabolical
behind the scene forces of the Hegelian Dialectic that drive global
terrorism, before the country can ever be
effective in defending itself from its own domestic terrorism. The
roots of this terror reach far deeper than the antediluvian
“militant Islam” projected as being on the rampage
worldwide. It penetrates right into the very heart of empire and
enables its “imperial mobilization” worldwide.

The
sorry fact that the entire establishment of Pakistan, in toto, is
self-servingly pitching that imperial narrative while continuing to
permit her sovereignterritories
to be droned by the sole superpower, with occasional
outbursts of bravado by her own military in equally futile military
operations which mostly kill and displace her own innocent civilians,
which in turn naturally seed from amongst the angry and traumatized
survivors a continual supply of new recruits into the same terrorist
cesspool of suicide bombers, bespeaks of
the validity of the common man's rather empirical opinion
that childish fools and brigands and blackguards
are ruling Pakistan.

However,
I still hope that at least some sensible military leaders of
Pakistan, and its other elites with power to affect change and the
will to pursue it, are reading this article.

My
all time favorite physicist of Pakistan, the MIT literate prodigy,
Dr. Pervez Hoodbhoy, the scholar who contributed his own punditry to
the mantra of Islamism in dialectical penmanship to Daniel Pipes’
in erudite prose like “Between
Imperialism and Islamism”
and “The
Threat From Within”,
once wrote me in response to my trying to get him to see that Bin
Laden couldn’t have done 911 as WTC collapses looked like
controlled demolition and that he, Hoodbhoy, was failing to connect
all the dots which clearly lead to puppetmasters, saying something to
the effect: ~ “remember
how our ancestors connected the dots in the sky and saw all those
shapes as their gods…”.

So
henceforth, Pervez Hoodbhoy judiciously avoided connecting the dots
lest he too be misled into seeing things that aren’t there,
while of course finding it infinitely pleasurable to continue echoing
the mantras and axioms of empire. Not only MIT trained scientists,
but apparently almost all major scientists and scholars of any IVY
and other lofty pedigree are pregnant with imperial wisdom in that
way.

These
brilliant scholars only see puppetshows, and painstakingly describe
them, but never go towards uncovering the forces which drive them.
Since I have already described their salient characteristics in
detail before, let me just reproduce it here as its worthwhile to
relate that to the topic at hand:

None
of them betray that they possess long term memories, or any
comprehension of even recent history that can be contextualized to
the present.

None
of them seem to have heard of ‘covert-ops’, ‘black-ops’,
and 'false-flag operations'; none of them have read the shrewd
analysis of the imperial thinkers themselves of the necessity of
real mobilizing pretexts such as the “New
Pearl Harbor” and
“clear
and present danger”
as otherwise “Democracy
is inimical to imperial mobilization“.

None
of them apparently understand that covert-ops while they are
operational and active, are meant to be secretive and mendacious,
which is why they are called ‘covert’, and that their
unraveling necessitates perceptively seeing beyond what’s
being deliberately made manifest and what’s being insisted
upon as ‘two
plus two equals five’
– for hard receipts for them will only be uncovered by
historians through the famed declassification process post faits
accomplis (i.e., ex post facto). The visible effects of these
covert-ops and false-flag operations blamed on patsies is however
commented upon with most erudite sophistication.

Thus
all of these ‘astute’ thinkers, commentators, and media
pundits none too miraculously reach the same minimal and common
conclusion space regardless of their own starting thesis, or the
circuitous routes taken in their analysis and speculations, that at
the bare minimum, the scourge of ‘fundamentalism’ and
‘militant Islam’ needs to be checked with renewed
commitment in the global ‘war on terror’, or else no one
in the ‘civilized world’ would remain safe from these
antiquated Taliban style ‘evil jihadis’ and ‘al
qaeeda’. That root of terror has now been successfully
showcased as residing in Pakistan – the ‘Terror
Central’!

The
root of terror is further determined to be funded by Saudi Arabia,
which is itself visibly seen to be pushing its
Salafi-Wahabi-Deobandi brand of antediluvian
terror upon its surrounding nations, from Syria to Pakistan, in
cahoots with the Taliban and Al-Qaeda; in fact, it is variously
argued that Saudi Arabia is largely behind the resurgence of the
latter “insurgency” throughout the world.

It
is indeed deemed a ‘clash of civilizations’, not of the
East and the West titans, but of ‘radical antiquated militant
Islam’ and the rest of civilized humanity! That “Today
[even] if one could wipe America off the map of the world with a wet
cloth, mullah-led fanaticism will not disappear”,
as the distinguished native-informant par excellence, the world
class physicist Pervez Hoodbhoy, has
conclusively observed in his latest analysis of the matter in
“Preventing
More Lal Masjids”,
and which he had earlier explored in great analytical depth in “The
Threat From Within”.
And none [too] surprisingly, echoing the same mantra of Pakistan
becoming a ‘terrorist sanctuary’ [as] CNN a few days ago
[which] aired the documentary by Nick Richardson “Pakistan
– The Threat Within”.
The unanimity of this conclusion space is scary to say the least –
at least for us Pakistanis.

It
would appear that the world’s leading thinkers, journalists,
newsmedia, scholars and leaders “united
we stand”
that Pakistan poses a serious threat to world peace! Not
the hectoring hegemons who have cleverly utilized 911 “to
goosestep the Herrenvolk across international frontiers”in
what only appears to be another ‘operation
canned goods’
or the ‘Reichstag
fire’,
the much coveted ‘New
Pearl Harbor’
to achieve the ‘transformation
of [its] forces’
to achieve ‘full
spectrum dominance’
over the planet and outerspace; but
my wretched lands of the ancient Indus valley, and my wretched
peoples – we are the world threat! –
Saving
Pakistan from Synthetic ‘Terror Central’ –
Orchestration of ‘Lal Masjid’ – a precursor to
‘shock and awe’? July 13-23, 2007.

In
the light of what is transpiring in Pakistan today, it is not at all
prescient that Pervez Hoodbhoy should have written the following in
his ode to Daniel Pipes: “The
Threat From Within”.
In response to it, I had been compelled to write to
dissent-specialist Hoodbhoy that had there not been an author’s
name in that document and someone had asked me to guess who had
written it, I would have easily guessed Daniel Pipes. Take a look at
the following passage for instance:

‘Is
Radical Islam Inevitable?

With
the large and growing popular sentiment against Musharraf and his
army, one cannot rule out the possibility that in the years ahead
nuclear armed Pakistan may fall under a neo-Taliban style
Salafi-Wahabi-Deobandi leadership allied with conservative senior
military leaders. If it does, then Pakistan could become the world’s
most dangerous state. But, although possible, it is certainly not
inevitable – countervailing forces work against this nightmare
scenario.’ —— Pervez Hoodbhoy, Pakistan
– The Threat From Within, Pakistan Security Research Unit
(PSRU), Brief Number 13, 23rd May 2007.

The
Muslim mind grossly misperceives the difference between gardeners
and weeds. Focussing on weeds, no matter how eruditely, is
inconsequential if the diabolical gardeners who secretly water it
without revealing their role (wit Brzezinski “God is on your
side”), and often also manufacture it (wit Zionism, Islamism),
are not dealt with first. Their ‘ubermensch’ mind will
always cultivate or synthesize newer varieties as deemed necessary
for “imperial mobilization”.

The
first order problem is not the weeds, which is only the effect. The
first order problem is their first-cause, the gardeners. These
“weeds” do not grow to this level of social and
political penetration all by themselves.

The
weeds are “tickled” into existence, fertilized, nurtured
and harvested by the gardeners for crafting a perpetual enemy to
fight against, often times as red herrings.

While
the unsuspecting public attention remains focussed on the weeds’
attention-grabbing plays in the left-field, the real game of
“imperial mobilization” goes on in the right-field.

The
wanton terror of these weeds is at times naturally occurring, by the
very fact of their continually fertilized existence, and by the
“doctrinal motivation” of “God
is on your side”
fed them; at other times it is created on demand, as targeted
false-flag operations subsequently blamed on the weeds who often die
in the process; and always kept in the public mind by the power of
myth
construction,
of an elusive all powerful Ali Baba and his rapidly multiplying
surrogates of “militant Islam” who not only threaten all
of Westerndom, but the entire civilized world.

The
modern uniforms of this Western manufactured terror base are those
of the Salafi-Wahabi-Deobandis-Taliban-Al-Qaeeda et. al. motif. Only
the label and color of uniform varies to give the illusion of
multiplying weeds.

These
vile surrogates and their sub surrogates work for empire in the many
countries of the world no differently than NATO's Stay Behind Armies
once did in the many nations of Western Europe; controlled through
layers of compartmentalized handlers in cellularized
semi-autonomous networks, and operating
under the singular overarching directive to keep the threat of
Islamofascism alive in the public mind.

These
terror cells may well be at liberty to do random terrorism just like
in Operation Gladio of yesteryear; given leeway to settle petty
scores among themselves in their competition to grow and prosper –
say on cornering the opium, weapon, theology, or terror markets;
even encouraged to serve the local political bosses and domestic
intelligence apparatuses for the opportunities
to corrupt and co-opt that it presents; while major catastrophic
terror acts being centrally planned, coordinated, and rehearsed in
compartmentalized teams for years to create the flawless executions
seen in the many false-flag operations since 9/11, including 9/11.

The
fact that “Saudi petro dollars” are only in proxy
service to their masters’ voice is no state-secret.

Cut
off the gardeners' resupply lines to the
weeds, and the weeds will not only die their own natural death with
no intelligence apparatuses and networks left to feed them, but that
fate can then, finally, also be accelerated
by some judicious use of “RoundUp”, the weed killer!

Understanding Self-Inflicted Terror

Understanding
Manufactured Terror – THE WHY?

Witness
the following from the period of the Cold War, where synthetic terror
was used in Western Europe in order to convince the increasingly
skeptical Western European public that the Communist threat was real
– revealed ex post facto in the BBC documentary in 1992 on
NATO's Operation
Gladio.
Part-3
of the Gladio documentary has the following lovely statement quoted
from the US Army's Top Secret Field Manual:

“Top
Secret: There may be times when host country governments show
passivity or indecision in the face of Communist subversion ... US
Army Intelligence must have the means of launching special operations
which will convince host country governments and public opinion of
the reality of the insurgent danger ... US Army Intelligence
should seek to penetrate the insurgency by means of agents of special
assignments, with the task of forming special action groups among the
most radical elements of the insurgency.”

Replacing
“Communist subversion” in the text above with
“Islamofascist terror” or "domestic-terrorists'
terror" makes what is being stated in this BBC documentary
ominous. It begs the commonsensical question: Is wanton acts of
terrorism inflicted upon innocent civilians still a Machiavellian
part of statecraft today?

According
to James Jesus Angleton, Head of CIA Counter Intelligence Operations
from 1954 to 1974, and under whose watch all the momentous
terroristic murders of America's most rebellious political leaders
transpired (JFK, RFK, MLK, X), Machiavelli is statecraft:
“Deception is a state of mind and the mind of the state”

Zbigniew
Brzezinski, former president Jimmy Carter's national security
advisor, observed the following in his 1996 book The Grand
Chessboard:

“It
is also a fact that America is too democratic at home to be
autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America's power, especially
its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a populist
democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of
power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in
conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of
domestic well-being. The economic self-denial (that is defense
spending), and the human sacrifice (casualties even among
professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to
democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial
mobilization.”

During
the inception of the Cold War, Harry S. Truman, the 33rd President of
the United States, in a 1947 National Security Council directive
known as NSC 10/2, signed the Machiavellian idea of “Plausible
Deniability” and public deception as essential to
undertaking successful covert operations:

'NSC
10/2 directed CIA to conduct “covert” rather than merely
“psychological” operations, defining them as all
activities “which are conducted or sponsored by this Government
against hostile foreign states or groups or in support of friendly
foreign states or groups but which are so planned and executed
that any US Government responsibility for them is not evident to
unauthorized persons and that if uncovered the US Government can
plausibly disclaim any responsibility for them.”'

These
Machiavellian insight into the calculus of statecraft by American
statesmen themselves beg the obvious question: Does “Plausible
Deniability” still continue after the end of the Cold War, and
if so, how does it manifest itself?

The
Muslim mind grossly misperceives the difference between gardeners
and weeds. Focussing on weeds, no matter how eruditely, is
inconsequential if the diabolical gardeners who secretly water it
without revealing their role (wit Brzezinski “God is on your
side”), and often also manufacture it (wit Zionism, Islamism),
are not dealt with first. Their ‘ubermensch’ mind will
always cultivate or synthesize newer varieties as deemed necessary
for “imperial mobilization”.

The
first order problem is not the weeds, which is only the effect. The
first order problem is their first-cause, the gardeners. These
“weeds” do not grow to this level of social and
political penetration all by themselves.

The
weeds are “tickled” into existence, fertilized, nurtured
and harvested by the gardeners for crafting a perpetual enemy to
fight against, often times as red herrings.

While
the unsuspecting public attention remains focussed on the weeds’
attention-grabbing plays in the left-field, the real game of
“imperial mobilization” goes on in the right-field in
the guise of countering the terror being continually manufactured by
these weeds; at times naturally by the very fact of their
continually fertilized existence and the “doctrinal
motivation” fed to them; at other times on demand as targeted
false-flag operations blamed on the weeds who often die in the
process; and always by the power of myth construction of an elusive
all powerful Ali Baba and his rapidly multiplying surrogates in the
now well-fertilized terrain of “militant Islam” who not
only threaten all of Westerndom, but the entire civilized world.

The
modern uniforms of this Western manufactured terror base are those
of the Salafi-Wahabi-Deobandis-Taliban-Al-Qaeeda et. al. motif. Only
the label and color of uniform varies to give the illusion of
multiplying weeds.

These
vile surrogates and their sub surrogates work for empire no
differently than NATO's Stay Behind Armies did, through layers of
compartmentalized handlers.

The
fact that “Saudi petro dollars” are only in proxy
service to their masters’ voice is no state-secret.

Cut
off the gardeners' resupply lines to the
weeds, and the weeds will not only die their own natural death with
no intelligence apparatuses left to feed them, but that fate can
then, finally, also be accelerated by some
judicious use of “RoundUp”, the weed killer!

By
Chomsky's definition, the “worthy victim” is
always worthy of being mourned, as it is made victim by the bad guys
or their allies. The “unworthy victim” is unworthy
of being mourned or even worrying about, as it is made victim by the
good guys or their allies.

And
because frequently occurring “worthy victims” continually
refuel the necessary “doctrinal motivation, intellectual
commitment, and patriotic gratification” to sustain
“imperial mobilization” since “democracy
is inimical to imperial mobilization” as Zbigniew
Brzezinski puts it, it is not beyond empire to create the “worthy
victims” itself using the bad guys as stooges.

If
you are bothered by these images of “Harmless innocence
Melt” (Milton), mercilessly snuffed out in the bud and
unworthy of even being mourned by both the massa and its house
niggers, then:

The
whole aim of practical politics of dissent by genuine gadflies to
power is to prevent the future fait accompli that is being engineered
by 'history's actors' in the present. This is why genuine dissent,
that with real teeth and non-zero efficacy, cannot be permitted to
exist and flourish. It is instead replaced with manufactured dissent
as an essential part of statecraft itself when the illusion of
dissent and public opinion is to be maintained in a 'free' democratic
society.

Rehearsing
crimes of power after these crimes are fait accompli; after all the
barbers in town already know it; after their disclosure as the
narrative of official history through FOIA declassification,
whistle-blowing and deep-throat leaks, and in posthumous confessional
diaries of monumental war criminals, none of which really reveal any
real secrets, or only do so ex post facto when it is already a fait
accompli; is either the job of the professional historian who relies
on officialdom to write the official history pre-sanctioned by power
by what it chooses to document and what it chooses to make-believe to
posterity, or of manufactured dissent!

Malcolm
X, assassinated by the “lone gunman” along with
other recalcitrant political leaders of the United States in the
1960s, offered the following perceptive description of the house
nigger and the massa in his autobiography:

“Today's
Uncle Tom doesn't wear a handkerchief on his head. This modern,
twentieth-century Uncle Thomas now often wears a top hat. He's
usually well-dressed and well-educated. He's often the
personification of culture and refinement. The twentieth-century
Uncle Thomas sometimes speaks with a Yale or Harvard accent.
Sometimes he is known as Professor, Doctor, Judge, and Reverend, even
Right Reverend Doctor. This twentieth-century Uncle Thomas is a
professional Negro ... by that I mean his profession is being a Negro
for the white man.” -- (Malcolm X, The Autobiography of
Malcolm X, 1964, 1999 hardcover edition, Chapter Black Muslims, page
265)

Martin
Luther King Jr., also assassinated by the “lone gunman”,
inspired by Malcolm X's unrelenting witticism, also dared to
reluctantly capture the mind of the house nigger who eats from the
massa's plate thusly:

“The
white establishment is skilled in flattering and cultivating emerging
leaders. It presses its own image on them and finally, from imitation
of manners, dress, and style of living, a deeper strain of corruption
develops. This kind of Negro leader acquires the white man’s
contempt for the ordinary Negro. He is often more at home with the
middle-class white than he is among his own people. His language
changes, his location changes, his income changes, and ultimately he
changes from the representative of the Negro to the white man into
the white man’s representative to the Negro. The tragedy is
that too often he does not recognize what has happened to him.”
-- (Martin Luther King Jr., A Testament of Hope, page 307)

Witness
the following statement by Lord Babington Macaulay, in his speech
before the English Parliament in 1835 devising the new education
policy for the Indian sub-continent – the Jewel in the Crown of
the British Empire – to deliberately fashion the house
nigger to serve empire:

“We
must at present do our best to form a class who may be interpreters
between us and the millions whom we govern, --a class of persons
Indian in blood and colour, but English in tastes, in opinions, in
morals and in intellect.” -- (Lord Thomas Babington Macaulay,
Minute on Education, 2nd February 1835, page 8)

In
summation, self-inflicted terror, manufactured by Machiavellian
techniques of perception management and narrative control which
employ a retinue of stooges, dupes and patsies, is always accompanied
by cloaking narratives of the Mighty Wurlitzer in order to make the
act of terror achieve its core purpose of mass behavior control. In
order to deflect the intelligent people among the public from
unraveling the covert agenda and being believed by the masses,
villainous methods ranging from “plausible deniability”
to alleging “conspiracy theory” are employed to confuse
and mislead the rest of the public from believing the unraveling.

Not
that complicated is it, once the diabolical methods of Machiavellian
statecraft and its engagement with the Hegelian Dialectic are
understood. Without achieving that perceptive understanding however,
the whole concept of self-inflicted terror indeed appears like a
'kookish' conspiracy theory.

Understanding
Current Affairs

So
now go and apply all that knowledge and insights learned to
understanding current affairs. All larger than life terrorist acts
worldwide, from the “terror central” which is Pakistan to
the United States' 9/11, London's 7/7 to India's 26/11, and
Afghanistan to the Middle East, the so called asymmetric warfare
between non-state actors creating “insurgency” and the
state-machinery's heavy-handed response called “counter-insurgency”,
both designed to augment the perpetually drummed-up international
threat of “rogue-states” destroying the civilized world
with their ill-gotten WMDs, are part of that same calculus of
“imperial mobilization”. The Machiavellian import of the
statement: “But the pursuit of power is not a goal that
commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or
challenge to the public's sense of domestic well-being.”,
suddenly takes on real empirical dimensions from mere words in an
imperial paperback. The publicly reported facts by mainstream news
and telling photographic/video images that have emerged on the
internet from the Boston Marathon Bombing of 2013, begin to make a
lot more sense when viewed from this overarching diabolical calculus,
of a self-inflicted Operation Gladio Boston, than what the
mainstream narratives echoed from federal, state, and city
officialdom would have one believe.

Indeed,
a careful re-examination and consequent unlayering of all prior
public beliefs that are based primarily on the officialdom's
narratives of who committed all these terror acts, and why, from the
first catastrophic terrorism on 9/11 in New York to its mostly
psy-ops sibling on 4/15 in Boston, can induce severe cognitive
dissonance. It is the state of mental discomfort upon realizing
that virtually everything one has been led to believe in these
matters, may in fact be nothing more than just Alice in Wonderland
make-belief. That, the real imperial play going on in the left-field
is something else entirely, while the public's attention is
diabolically drawn to the staged-theatrics of Islamofascist terror
in the right-field!

As
soon as one realizes this monumental public fraud, of manufactured
and synthetic terror being instrumental for “imperial
mobilization”, suddenly all the wonderful people worldwide,
from statesmen to politicians to intellectuals, who have led the
gullible public to make-believe in the tooth-fairy Osama Bin Laden
and Al Qaeeda, themselves become the NEW PUBLIC ENEMY
NUMBER ONE --- Oh what a shift in enemy a mere shift in
perspective can make when one learns how to separate propaganda from
the reality of the matter:

Caption
An FBI video presentation titled “Militancy Considerations”
measures the relationship between religion-piety and violence among
the followers of the texts of the three Abrahamic faiths [
the god's chosen people obviously coming out on top!!! ]
As time goes on, the followers of the Torah and the Bible move from
“violent” to “non-violent.” Not so for
devotees of the Koran, whose “moderating process has not
happened.” The line representing violent behavior from devout
Muslims flatlines and continues outward, from 610 A.D. to 2010. In
other words, according to this FBI presentation, observes wired.com,
the religious Muslims have been and always will be agents of
aggression. Click on the image to read Zahir's examination of this
lovely graph (Image source wired.com)

So
apply all that comprehension to the re-examination of the most recent
so called “Islamofascist terror” event beamed to the
worldwide audience, the Boston Marathon Bombing, and make up your own
mind who is the real enemy:

Imperial
Mobilization to induce “birth pangs of a new Middle East”
is variously blamed upon:

the
Zionist agenda for Eretz Yisrael ;

and/or
upon the sole superpower's Primacy and Its Geostrategic
Initiatives, as architected by Zbigniew Brzezinski, to
preemptively acquire and extract the natural resources in the Middle
East and Central Asia before any other nation or group of nations
can rise to challenge its dominance.

The
former Zionist agenda is pitched as the ungodly wars waged by the
Jewish neocons who dominate Washington, blueprinted in their PNAC and
other Wolfowitz drawn strategy documents for Securing the
Jews-only Realm.

The
latter superpower agenda is pitched as the wars of primacy for
America's sole preeminence, blueprinted in Zbigniew Brzezinski's The
Grand Chessboard and in Pentagon's many Joint Vision
strategy documents.

Both
premise, while appearing sensible in 2003 when I too employed them in
my maiden book Prisoners of the Cave, in the light of today's
empiricism outright lead to absurdities.

America
is going bankrupt due to these global wars with rising national debt
which now stands in the 13 trillion dollar range as officially
reported by the US Treasury, and its budget deficit this year, 2011,
is 1.4 trillion dollars. This means America has to borrow, i.e., have
its central bank the Federal Reserve print, 40 cents for every dollar
it spends, thus also commensurately increasing the national debt and
the burden upon the already suffering American tax payer.

What
sort of idiotic primacy agenda for preeminence is that?

The
United States hasn't been able to extract any of the natural
resources either from the Middle East and Central Asian soils anymore
than she was already extracting previously – as much as it
wanted – with its own coddled dictators firmly in power.

Why
did she need to wage murderous wars to decimate the region to remove
its own cultivated dictators?

It
also sure hasn't been good for the Anglo-American oil companies –
they can't do business when the region is torn asunder by the cycle
of insurgency and counter-insurgency manufactured by the
Anglo-American Allies themselves. Same in Afghanistan – no
pipelines, only the so called quagmires, as even the mainstream news
of the United States puts it.

As
for Israel, if Eretz Yisrael is the principal reason for decimating
Iraq with millions of tons of Depleted Uranium munitions, destroying
its fertile top soils and bountiful water tables, not to mention the
ancient DNA of its inhabitants, and with only immense hatred and ire
of its millions of Arabs now irretrievably implanted to greet the
Zionist from Israel if they ever set foot onto its soil for
resettlement, then the Jews can't really occupy that land for
themselves now can they?

What
did the Israelis really gain by brutally removing the servile Iraqi
puppet of their own client state, the United States?

Only
chaos in the region!

What
Zionistan's founding father, David Ben Gurion, would have easily
called “revolutionary times”. Well, according to that
science of hegemonic conquest, these chaos-like conditions in the
Middle East have also only created more fertile grounds to administer
further mind-fcks to the natives because “what is
inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times”.

What
other benefit? Perhaps some smaller equally compliant but unstable
ethnic principalities carved out of the former equally compliant
monolithic and stable Iraq, which today lies in ruin.

It
is best summed up in Sun Tzu's The Art of War
for all those handful who dare to stand up but continue to flounder
chasing red herrings:

'If
you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of
a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every
victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither
the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.'

For
all the rest of silently spectating mankind, the image below speaks
it all:

Caption
Silence is a WAR CRIME: “and I still curse the killers,
their accomplices, the indifferent spectators who knew and kept
silent, and Creation itself, Creation and those who perverted and
distorted it. I feel like screaming, howling like a madman so that
that world, the world of the murderers, might know it will never be
forgiven.” (Nobel Laureate Director of the famous
HolocaustTM Museum in Washington DC, Elie Wiesel, the
self-proclaimed “traumatized Jew” and “melitz
yosher” as the “defender of Israel” after surviving
the infamous Nazi HolocaustTM, writing in his memoir All
Rivers Run to the Sea)

Letter To Anyone Who Cares

Pakistan
is going through very rough times today. But these dystopic times are
no more rough than the decades which preceded the partition of the
Indian subcontinent. It is often said that history, especially
dystopic history, repeats itself. If we can get a handle on how the
current affairs of that pre-partition era were manipulated,
orchestrated, aided and abetted into existence to serve a larger
geopolitical agenda, then it can help us understand some of the
forces doing the same today. The most significant
character of that era is "Sir" Allama Mohammad Iqbal of
Sialkot. The re-examination of our political history in the essay:
Sacred
Cow: Allama Iqbal - marde-momin or superman By Zahir Ebrahim?
( http://tinyurl.com/Allama-Iqbal-ubermensch
), unmasks many of the forces that motivated this fellow into serving
imperial interests in the name of serving Muslims and Islam. These
forces have not perished, but similarly fabricating and orchestrating
events in Pakistan today with a new retinue of stooges and
mercenaries. The modus operandi, unsurprisingly enough, isn't
dissimilar either (and why change it when it works so well). Chaos
conditions are fabricated with terror to create social tension which
is subsequently harvested as "demands" of the people. That
modus operandi of recent history already out in the open, called the
"strategy of tension" in Western Europe, can be studied in
the article: Operation
Gladio Yesterday and Worldwide Terrorism Today – Identifying
the Enemy By Zahir Ebrahim
( http://tinyurl.com/Op-Gladio-and-Terrorism-Today
).

I
have become mostly disillusioned with both my brilliant friends and
the people of my country, Pakistan. None of them, it would appear,
evidently harbor any useful intelligence whatsoever, never mind moral
courage to stand up to narrative control. Without full spectrum
narrative control, no one would believe any of the myths being
foisted upon the public mind. Despite
copious advanced degrees and other high-falutin credentials and
national accolades, even the most learned Pakistanis, learned with
advanced Western degrees mostly, appear little different than the
outright ignorant masses talking current-affairs at tea-stands. The
intelligentsia of Pakistan specifically,
with access to news media and corridors of power, are evidently
outright crooks and liars, if not naive simpletons who make great
useful idiots for carrying the white man's burden.
Selling the soul to the devil is evidently the favorite pastime of
Pakistanis, both by acts of commission and acts of omission. I have
never had any patience for these crooks and liars who continue to
harp the core narratives of empire in minor variations thus further
putting the Pakistani masses into a perpetual mind-lock chasing
absurd antidotes for global “war on terror”, “Deobandi
terror”, “militant Islam”, et. al. In fact, no
differently than how this most hyped of all founders of Pakistan,
“Sir” Allama Iqbal, got the Muslims of the Indian
sub-continent to chase their own antidote to Hindu-Muslim terror in
the form of a new Muslim state. That achievement even became the
international precedence-setter at the UN to serve the Jewish demand
for their own antidote to Christian-terror in a newly carved out
Jewish state (in case any member nation objected to the Jewish state
being carved out in Muslim soil, but none that mattered objected).
Both fabrications transpired in extreme violence upon the respective
indigenous peoples. Both were based on synthetic demand creation that
was made to appear organic. Both were principally based on narrative
control.

Perceptively
understanding the lesson of the oligarchic forces prevailing upon our
birth can only help us perceptively understand the forces
orchestrating current affairs on our death-bed. I am not sure if that
is sufficient to alter our ill-fated destiny on the grand chessboard,
but it is surely the first step to breaking free from the
strangulating web of narrative control which limits our horizons, our
creative problem-solving, and which subliminally as well as
cognitively channels us as a nation to only serve overarching agendas
carved out in Western think-tanks and its policy-halls. In the age of
universal deceit, to learn the truth is a revolutionary act.

Masterpiece of Plagiarism in Pakistan - Peerless in something, at last!

Caption Uncovering the Masterpiece of Plagiarism in Pakistan: Hear no evil, Speak no evil, See no evil. Click on image to uncover the dizzying heights Pakistani physics can rise beyond expectations -- the near perfection in the art of facsimile reproduction by its physicist in two near-verbatim fully plagiarized books! (image via wiki)

I
wish to bring to the notice of the world of academe the bold
plagiarism of the work of world’s best known physicist and
Nobel laureate of 1918, Max Planck, including verbatim theft from
others to build up a padded portfolio of plagiarized publications,
and its aiding and abetting by the Higher Education Commission (HEC)
of Pakistan through a conspiracy of dunces, inept policies, and a
systemic culture of corruption and whitewash wherein Paul protects
Peter while they all receive payouts from the public exchequer by
bloated anointments as ‘Distinguished National Professor’
and other sainthood. ...

HEC's whitewash response: “HEC
has NEVER condoned any act of plagiarism anywhere. The case has been
investigated and immediate action has been taken. We are all shocked
by this blatant act of plagiarism but are certainly not responsible
for it. Dr. Durrani alone is responsible for what he has done and not
his colleagues, University of Gujrat, HEC etc.”

Open Letter to the Doctors of America from Zahir Ebrahim

April 30, 2013

Dear Medical Practitioners in the
United States of America

What bothers me about America is
that of the 20,000 doctors and surgeons in Boston, from Harvard-MIT
MD-Phds to the Dana-Farber super-specialists in every healthcare
related field esoterica, not one can stand up to call a spade a
spade? The physician I spoke to privately
on Jeff Bauman's Boston Marathon explosion injury images broadcast in
the newsmedia (see Domestic
Terror and Police-State), with just one look at the
photos told me this cannot possibly be real.

Yet no medical practitioner,
professor of medicine, EMT, EMS, man of science or man of
commonsense from Boston to San Francisco has publicly made that call
that the exploded legs victim looking alert and not bleeding to death
while being strolled on Boylston Street in
a wheelchair instead of a gurney is an absurdity?

Is that what you teach your
medical students in the United States of America?

What has gone wrong that this
nation only produces cowards?

Did Americans learn nothing from
the Banality of Evil that created (and destroyed) the Third Reich?

Are you super learned AMA and
FDA approved professors of medicine blind? Or merely “United We
Stand” super Good Americans?

The
New SAVAK in Pakistan,
the latest spate of shia killings, should be examined in the context
given
below
and the senseless creation of “revolutionary times”
across the world will begin to make sense. Pakistan is a component of
it. That component is tickled through sectarianism as that is the
genius of our peoples. Other nations are tickled according to their
own respective genius minds. The
New SAVAK in Pakistan
works for these superman gods in no less a measure than the
old SAVAK worked for its own superman god. Is this stuff
rocket science you people? Why can't learned people in Pakistan see
it? Especially why can't the high falutin armchair analysts, and the
defense analysts, who have routine access to media see it? Look at my
examination systematically unlayering the
overarching context below.
Does that sound like American empire or Zionist empire to any of you?
Or does it appear exactly what it is -- an Oligarchic Empire for
World Government being constructed with “an end run around
national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece” (Hard
Road to World Order, CFR 1974
– read the superman's paper if you think I make things up with
my unconstrained hyperactive imagination)!

Com'on
you idle spectators and bullshit purveyors (those who deliver crap in
the opportunity they get in the media), all my good friends I am
sure. Six feet under the maggots can't tell the bloody difference.
Only the dead have seen the end of war, says Plato. Sure -- those
living see it everyday. And Most recently, in the systematic Muslim
killings in Pakistan where, in the immediate aftermath of targeting
the Hazara shias in Quetta with a bomb on
16 Feb. 2013, the shia eye surgeon, Dr. Ali Haider,
and his 11-year-old son Murtaza Haider
(photos above, more graphic images here),
were ruthlessly and prematurely dispatched to meet their Maker with
bullets to their head in Lahore this past Monday, 18 Feb. 2013. إِنَّا
لِلّهِ وَإِنَّـا
إِلَيْهِ رَاجِعونَ
.

You,
me, all of us, don't speak up right now, you, all of you my friends
in Pakistan, they are coming for you and me next (the question in the
photo above is not merely rhetorical; the assertion by the child is
also not rhetorical, but a dare, a show of courage and perseverance
that mirrors the Palestinian defiance living and dying under the
jackboots of a superman terrorist state). For, this is the
harvest of remaining silent when ZA Bhutto
was politically declaring the Qadianis
non-Muslims. Watch
this confessional speech in Urdu by the brilliant late Pakistani Shia
scholar, Allama Syed Irfan Haider Abidi, in which he openly
apportions due credit to the Shia scholars of the time, of 1974, for
participating in that political travesty in support of the Sunni
ullema led effort that ZA Bhutto was orchestrating from behind the
scenes to neutralize the American sponsored fanatic
religious opposition to him (see Profiles of Intelligence quoted in
Who
Killed Benazir Bhutto for America's role in funding
the PNA Alliance of the religious right to finally unseat ZA Bhutto).

Who
gives the right to man to challenge another's beliefs; let alone deny
a people their political, religious, civil, and basic human rights,
including to not be killed by either the pirate or the emperor for
their beliefs, inheritance, ethnicity, their land, whatever? See
Islam
and Knowledge vs. Socialization.

You
open that can of worms by the state giving legitimacy to calling one
group “kafir”, and now the Shias and Ismailis are the new
“kafirs” today. Following that,
who's next? YOU, my sunni friends, who are silently watching
the spectacle of shia deaths and demonization, just as both together
previously spectated the Qadiani pogroms in
silence; you and your parents, and your siblings still living in
Pakistan and unlucky enough to not have the Green
Card or Canadian citizenship. It is these cracks and
lacunas in our sectarian ethos which are perennially ripe for harvest
for the “revolutionary times”, we see being
enacted today in Pakistan. Unless we get rid of these sectarian
cracks that are repeatedly and deliberately enlarged into fault-lines
by empire builders who know how to both cultivate and harvest these
most efficiently for “imperial mobilization”, we are
burnt toast.

And
learned people who are supposed to have the wherewithal to lead the
charge, to educate the public mind to what's really going on, to
motivate them to stand up, have all been turned into glorified House
Niggers and useful idiots.

Never
too late to throw that yoke of servitude---even for house niggers and
silent bystanders---and for selfish reasons of self-preservation if
not for altruistic concern for anyone else.

So
what can we do? Two things to begin with:

1)
Perceptively comprehend the overarching motivation of the
super-terrorists in order to come up with
proper self-defence. See my article unlayering reality below.
Among all the patent lies the “vulgar propagandist”
(Chomsky's epithet, not mine) Bernard Lewis
spinned on Islam over the years, the one
thing he stated most accurately was: “Terrorism requires
only a few. Obviously the West must defend itself by whatever means
will be effective. But in devising means to fight the
[super]terrorist, it would surely be useful to understand the forces
that drive them.”Well,
obviously the victims of the super terrorists must
intelligently play at that table to also
defend themselves by whatever means will be effective. This
will lead all of us who are capable of understanding to comprehend
that all variants of Islam, “militant Islam”, “moderate
Islam”, and “revolutionary Islam”, are creations of
minds working assiduously on “imperial mobilization” over
a lifetime. None will therefore be fooled by them.

This
means shias won't be fooled by “revolutionary Islam”
despite their partisanship with the shia sect, and sunnis won't be
fooled by the other versions despite their partisanship to sunni
sects. These have nothing to do with the religion of Islam and its
1.6 to 2 billion ordinary believers --- but with methods of creating
“controlled chaos” by cognitive infiltration of the
religion, which means creating chaos that
is predictable, its tempo increasable and
decrease-able at will, and switch-off-able
when its purpose is harvested. At present, that tap control resides
in the West. It is entirely independent of the local population which
therefore cannot break through its strangulating grip in the normal
fashion. Just like the “Iron Wall” that surrounds
Palestine. That diabolical construct was accurately described by
VladimirJabotinsky:
“This colonization can, therefore, continue and develop only
under the protection of a force independent of the local population –
an iron wall which the native population cannot
break through.”

Something
similar to this “Iron Wall” protects these mal constructs
of “Islam” rapidly devouring our nation while
simultaneously lending the much needed pretext to the West for
sustaining its “imperial mobilization”.
Its strategic and full spectrum redressing takes more than just
ineffectively banning these terrorist organizations (which has been
tried halfheartedly in lip-service to the Hegelian
Dialectic) or ineffectively curtailing their antediluvian
“Islamization of Pakistan”
programs (which is talked about by the so called secular humanists
who are the second line of useful idiots of empire, the first being
our leaders, those who are not outright mercenaries that is). It is
discussed elsewhere.

2)
Bravely speak up, stand up, be part of the making your presence felt
in society by giving up the silence of the lamb, the ostrich, and the
coward.

In
that speaking up, and standing up, boycott the forthcoming 2013 Pakistani
elections.

Not
participating is a resounding NO vote to reject the entire corrupt
system. Do not participate in a fabricated system designed to ab
initio continue its servility to massa; all
waters run only Westward, even if wearing the turban, the beard,
clean-shaved, in uniform, in awami-libas,
in duppatta, in burqa
– and that includes Imran Khan, the favorite savior of the
young generation.

Unlayering the Middle East War Agenda: Making Sense of Absurdities

Sunday,
January 23, 2011

Preamble

This
is a response to the unforensic
focus on the Middle East War Agenda which permeates
the alternate media even today, well into the 10th year of the New
Pearl Harbor, orchestrated like the Nazi's Operation Canned
Goods to “goosestep the herrenvolk across
international frontiers”
– first into Afghanistan, Iraq, gradually inching its way
throughout the arc of crisis,
next target: the Crescent
of Crisis, Iran.
Time magazine had quoted Zbigniew Brzezinski self-servingly presaging
these very events in 1979 at the cusp of the Iranian Revolution: “An
arc of crisis stretches along the shores of the Indian Ocean, with
fragile social and political structures in a region of vital
importance to us threatened with fragmentation. The resulting
political chaos could well be filled by elements hostile to our
values and sympathetic to our adversaries.” (U.S.
National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew
Brzezinski, Time, Jan. 15, 1979)

It
was in the same year that President Jimmy Carter's National Security
Advisor, waging a clandestine proxy war upon the USSR, had started
giving covert aid to the CIA backed Afghan mercenaries (later renamed
“Mujahideens”) to foment sufficient agitation at the
flank of the USSR to provoke a Soviet Intervention in Afghanistan to
protect their own hegemonic interests: “According
to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began
during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded
Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until
now, is completely otherwise Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that
President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the
opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I
wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my
opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.”
After
the Soviet Union had taken the bait and invaded, blood-thirsty
murderer playing chess in other peoples' blood, Dr. Zbigniew
Brzezinski confessed in 1998 that he again wrote to Jimmy Carter back
in December 1979: “The day that the Soviets
officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter. We now
have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed,
for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by
the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and
finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.”
(1998
interview to French magazine Le
Nouvel Observateur)

Thus,
the arc of crisis
which Brzezinski had glibly predicted in January 1979, was firmly
seeded by January
1980
as the Carter Doctrine,
otherwise known as “God
is on your side”,
to set it all ablaze in the coming future. Sufficiently implanted
with the necessary explosive mix of religion, “jihad”,
hostage crisis, Iranian Revolution, Soviet intervention in
Afghanistan, drug trade, and sectarian fanaticism unleashed in
Pakistan by the hanging-judge-military dictator General Zia Ul Haq
installed there by the Carter White House in support of the CIA
cultivating and harvesting “Islamic Mujahideens” to fight
the USSR, it didn't take much ignition
beyond the priming. The fire quickly became self-sustaining as new
recruits grew up in the lighted cauldron
and couldn't easily distinguish their head from their ass –
especially with the Pakistan military being in full collusion with
the CIA in screwing both Pakistan and Afghanistan
society on the Grand Chessboard. Today, these war criminals pat
themselves on the back for destroying the USSR with Muslim and
Afghani blood costing the complete destruction of what was previously
a still stable Afghani and Pakistani society – but they'll all
hang someday even if their carcass has to be dragged out from six
feet under. In 1996, Zbigniew Brzezinski renamed the arc of
crisis in his next geostrategy
book The Grand Chessboard,
with an even more imposing epithet, “the
global zone of percolating violence”,illustrating
with
maps galore the arc of crisis
for those still uninitiated into the vagaries of the exercise of
American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Initiatives
of the sole unchallenged superpower. (page 53)

That
foretold future – explicitly and very publicly presaged in 1979
in a popular weekly magazine read by all and sundry not just in the
United States, but in the entire world – fully unleashed by the
New Pearl Harbor on
September 11, 2001, had the former US Secretary of State Condoleezza
Rice self-righteously justify the purpose of America's hegemonic
cultivation of “the
global zone of percolating violence”
in 2006 in these sacred words: “What we’re
seeing here, in a sense, is…the birth pangs of a new Middle
East and whatever we do, we have to be certain that we’re
pushing forward to the new Middle East, not going back to the old
one.”
(U.S. Secretary of State to George W. Bush, Condoleezza Rice, July
21, 2006)

All
the preceding is what the blood thirsty hectoring hegemons have
themselves narrated.

But
comparing their narration to empiricism tells a slightly different
story.

That
War Agenda today to “birth pangs of a new Middle East”
is still variously blamed upon:

the
Zionist agenda for Eretz Yisrael,

and/or
upon the sole superpower's Primacy and Its Geostrategic
Initiatives to preemptively acquire and extract the natural
resources in the Middle East and Central Asia before any other
nation or group of nations can rise to challenge its dominance.

The
former Zionist agenda is pitched as the ungodly wars waged by the
Jewish neoconservaties who dominate
Washington, blueprinted in their PNAC and other Wolfowitz drawn
strategy documents for Securing the Jews-only Realm.

The
latter superpower agenda is pitched as the wars of primacy for
America's sole preeminence, blueprinted in
Zbigniew Brzezinski's The Grand Chessboard and
in Pentagon's many Joint Vision
strategy documents.

Both
premise, while appearing sensible in 2003 when I too employed them in
my maiden book Prisoners of the Cave,
in the light of today's empiricism outright lead to absurdities.

America
is going bankrupt due to these global wars with rising national debt
which now stands in the 13 trillion dollar range as officially
reported by the US Treasury, and its budget deficit this year, 2011,
is 1.4 trillion dollars. This means America has to borrow, i.e., have
its central bank the Federal Reserve print, 40 cents for every dollar
it spends, thus also commensurately increasing the national debt and
the burden upon the already suffering
American tax payer.

What
sort of idiotic primacy agenda for preeminence
is that?

The
United States hasn't been able to extract any of the natural
resources either from the Middle East and Central Asian soils anymore
than she was already extracting previously – as much as it
wanted – with its own coddled dictators firmly in power.

Why
did she need to wage murderous wars to decimate the region to remove
its own cultivated dictators?

It
also sure hasn't been good for the Anglo-American oil companies –
they can't do business when the region is torn asunder by the cycle
of insurgency
and counter-insurgency
manufactured by the Anglo-American Allies themselves. Same in
Afghanistan – no pipelines, only the
so called quagmires, as
even the mainstream news of the United States puts it.

As
for Israel, if Eretz Yisrael
is the principal reason for decimating Iraq with millions of tons of
Depleted Uranium munitions, destroying its
fertile top soils and bountiful water tables, not to mention the
ancient DNA of its inhabitants, and with only immense hatred and ire
of its millions of Arabs now irretrievably implanted to greet the
Zionist from Israel if they ever set foot onto its soil for
resettlement, then the Jews can't really occupy that land for
themselves now can they?

What
did the Israelis really gain by brutally
removing the servile Iraqi puppet of their own client state, the
United States?

Only
chaos in the region!

What
Zionistan's founding father, David Ben Gurion, would have easily
called “revolutionary times”.
Well, according to that science of hegemonic conquest, these
chaos-like conditions in the Middle East
have also only created more fertile grounds to administer further
mind-fcks to the natives because “what is
inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times”.

What
other benefit? Perhaps some smaller equally compliant but unstable
ethnic principalities carved out of the former equally compliant
monolithic and stable Iraq, which today lies in ruin.

But
wait, NO Eretz Yisrael!

Only
enormous hatred for Israel, and America.

What
an agenda for preeminence!

Only
the keystone cops
could have blueprinted it.

Hmmm....

Reality
is almost like an onion.

Comes
in layers.

The
outer layer, when peeled, shows the next inner layer.

And
so on down to the core.

It
is difficult to get to the core of reality, without first unpeeling
it, layer by layer.

The
empirical fact however is that it is not mentioned in the mainstream,
and by many others in dissentstream either, because the conspiracy is
to not even acknowledge that the onion exists at all for social
engineering of ‘United we Stand’ and ‘introducing
beneficial cognitive diversity’ to mislead the public.

But
the outer layer of the onion is not the entire onion, however
persuasive and inviting it may appear!

These
are mere labels, the neocons,
neoconservatives, neo-cons, they mean
nothing by themselves.

America
has been involved in warfare from Wounded
Knee to Afghanistan, and before WWII, there were no neo-cons by that
name.

So
how does one explain America’s vast
military-industrial-academe-media complex which is what actually
wages the wars? How does one explain America's national security
state?

The
War on Terror, the war on Afghanistan, the war on Iraq, the war on
Pakistan, the war on Iran, on whatever
mantras and asinine pretexts, by themselves make no sense – as
the war of neo-conservatism – and it
is easy to pin it upon the most visible harbingers for their most
obvious motives! The outer layer of the onion.

Thomas
Friedman best captured the interplay of these two sides of the
imperial coin – the thunderous wars of shock and awe,
and the matching silent wars of hunger and deprivations due to the
loot and plunder of global natural resources via the stranglehold of
contrived third world debt – in his 1999 New York Times column
titled Manifesto
for a Fast World: “The hidden hand of the
market will never work without a hidden fist -- McDonald's cannot
flourish without McDonnell Douglas, the builder of the F-15. And the
hidden fist that keeps the world safe for Silicon Valley's
technologies is called the United States Army, Air Force, Navy and
Marine Corps.”

But
peel down behind both types of wars, behind both philosophies of
primacy which are as old as hegemony, as old as mankind, and we get
World Government.

Global
Governance would not be possible without the transformative abilities
of these wars which seed controlled chaos, deprivations,
disenfranchisement, and fabricated public appeals to authorities to
resolve matters. Which of course they subsequently do, with greater
and greater centralization of powers into the private hands of the
same oligarchy who create the very crises for which they ex post
facto present their own preferred
solutions. See: Response
to Financial Times Gideon Rachman's 'And now for a world government'.

David
Ben Gurion aptly described this Machiavellian modus operandi as “what
is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times”.

The
unlayering is important to get to the heart
of the matter, quickly, before it is too late. And one of the reason
it is not unlayered in time, is to seed
fait accompli. That is the master
political science. To understand this political
science which is time-critical and which is what enables only
narrating these matters ex post facto, see: “Of
Ostriches and Rebels on The Hard Road to World Order”.

That
too, by itself, is still not the inner most core of the onion, only
the next layer down, but it already demonstrates that focus on the
outer layer of the onion of reality, the visible reality, makes for a
great red herring.

No
one in Plato’s cave can ever figure out the reality behind the
images on the screen, by examining, and in no matter what
excruciating a scholarship, the images on the screen before them.

That
is why the outer layer of the onion, whether one sees the onion at
all or not, is often pointless garbage.

Whenever
I cook dinner at home, I always throw away the outer layer of the
onion, it tastes terrible :-)

Sacred Cow: Allama Iqbal - marde-momin or superman?

Allama
Iqbal defined “marde-momin” in his seminal poem titled
“Tulu-e-Islam” (طلوع
اسلام ).
In English it means “Renaissance of
Islam”. The poem is in his compilation Bang-e-Dara, and the
verse in which he used that specific word is:

Endeavoring
to induce “Renaissance
of Islam” among the backward Muslims is surely a
commendable cause to spend one's life in. Like the endeavor to
“reform Islam” itself, it can also be a fast ticket to
name and fame, knighthood and status.

It
is pertinent to point out the commonsense observation that when
“revolutionaries” and “reformers” are awarded
medals, titles, and knighthood by empire,
it can only mean that they work for the benefit of empire in some
way. The truth of these words is beyond doubt. It is self-evident.

It
has always bothered me that “Sir” Muhammad
Iqbal accepted the knighthood in 1922 from
the King of England, King George V, the head of state of the most
plunderous colonizing empire ruling the Indian sub-continent.

This
report which came to be called the Munir
Report, sheds a great deal of light on present matters pertaining to
the movement toward Shia kafirdom in Pakistan. The methods used
against the Ahmadiyas by the Ahrar
almost exactly 60 years ago is a mirror image of the methods being
used today by the Tafriki-Lej-alphabet-acronym-soup
(enumerated in my article: Some
Context for What's Transpiring in Pakistan and What Not to do in the
Upcoming 2013 Elections) against the largely
defenseless and unarmed Shia Muslims of Pakistan.

The
key difference to me between then and now is exactly one (apart from
the palpable fact that it was Ahmadis then
and Shias now):

Then
the government was incapacitated into taking no action against the
Ahrar's terrorism due to political
considerations in the fragile new Pakistan, and inadvertently let
the conditions between 1948-1952 exacerbate by wavering in its
determination to curb the politically motivated religious fanaticism
of the Ahrar leading to the riots of 1953 in Punjab against the
Ahmadis and the concomitant declaration of Pakistan's first martial
law in Punjab. In other words, then, as is evident from the Munir
Report, the situation was created due to political incompetence and
political calculus of the political officialdom in the new Pakistan
that the law and order deteriorated to that extent. Meaning, the
officialdom did not want it, and the Ahmadiya killings occurred
because of keeping political stability was deemed more important
than immediately curbing the law and order situation with a just but
unflinching hand and possibly exacerbating the situation.

Whereas
today, virtually all the power-wielders in Pakistan, some within the
govt., both federal and state, I am sure also district down to the
local thaana (police station) level, and
some within the Military and nearly all of the intelligence
apparatuses, and some within the media, I would say all the media
both local and foreign, and also big businesses (including
enterprises like Nestle Pakistan that has been supplying water to
the occupation troops in Afghanistan for the past 12 years and part
of officialdom in no less a measure than those officially drawing a
salary from the national treasury), comprise the 'new Ahrar'. And,
therefore, unlike what one sees in the Munir Report of repeated
governmental officials writing memos to senior administrators and
leaders to take stern action against the Ahrar, one will surely find
no such memos in today's government as all the officialdom is
together the 'new Ahrar'. I have already
analyzed why I they think the officialdom of Pakistan is the 'new
Ahrar' under the title 'The
New SAVAK in Pakistan'.

And
all indications continue to pile up that the Shias are being goaded
into militantly rising up (by killing a sufficient number of them) to
create a full scale internecine war in
Pakistan; Muslims killing Muslims once again to fertilize the “shia
crescent”. This is beyond any proxy
warfare between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and while its seeds are surely
planted in the deep seated shia-sunni differences, these spate of
shia killings and the accompanying propaganda warfare upon the Shia
Muslims of Pakistan is not due to Shia Sunni issue which is fourteen
centuries old.

Both
of those aforementioned factors that the media harps about, and the
politicians variously draw upon with approaching elections in
Pakistan, are misleading and calculated red herrings to disguise the
real purpose behind this warfare. Unfortunately, due to the media
participation in the New SAVAK project,
more and more Shia and Sunni public are both getting confused about
it.

Don't
get confused ---- it is a fabricated war along the Hegelian Dialectic
that I have by now surely explained to death on my website and have
now stopped explaining altogether. It's like kicking an already dead
dog to death.

But
if you do not understand Hegel, you cannot possibly make sense of any
of the apparent insanity in Pakistan. It is not insanity, but a
calculated game-theory laced warfare being waged upon Pakistan to
create a perpetual enemy for the West.

In
the next five years, there will likely arise a "Hezbollah"
Pakistan in reaction to the oppression by the New SAVAK
in Pakistan, and that is more than arm chair prediction. It is an
inevitability if the oppression upon the Shias of Pakistan continues.

One
can see that the Shias of Pakistan have been the most docile of
communities in Pakistan, largely self-obsessed in their rituals and
silently minding their own business amidst all the war on terror
being waged upon the world by the mightiest tyrants in the world
despite their lofty principled sloganeering that has defined the shia
ethos for fourteen centuries. One is forced to wonder why Shia
militancy is being “tickled” into existence if not to
bring to fruition the long awaited "shia
crescent".

Two
matched and armed to the teeth nemesis will paint Lahore to Karachi
more red than Peshawar to Quetta have been painted thus far
unilaterally by the "new Ahrar" and the "new SAVAK".

A
smart self-respecting people will surely always rise to defend
themselves --- but simultaneously, also refuse to be used as stooges
and patsies by declining to become the West's perpetual enemy.

To
not make the same national suicidal mistake as Iran takes a lot more
wherewithal, national sha-oor, than has
been publicly displayed by even the finest in Pakistan. For a nation
not known for either the abundance of its intellectual prowess, or
the superfluity of its noble integrity, it is not hard to perceive
that Pakistan was stochastically designed to be DOA
(dead on arrival) into this world.

I
will end by quoting the last paragraph of the Munir Report, and if
what it says was true then at the very inception of Pakistan, only
the janaza (funeral) remains to be recited
(I hope of course that I am wrong and persons of great commonsense
will miraculously come to the forefront of national leadership to
untie the Gordian knot so craftily tied on Pakistan's destiny on the
Grand Chessboard):

"And
it is our deep conviction that if the Ahrar had been treated as a
pure question of law and order, without any political considerations,
one District Magistrate and one Superintendent of Police could have
dealt with them. Consequently, we are prompted by something that they
call a human conscience to enquire whether, in our present state of
political development, the administrative problem of law and order
cannot be divorced from a democratic bed fellow called a Ministerial
Government, which is so remorselessly haunted by political
nightmares. But if democracy means the subordination of law and order
to political ends—then Allah knoweth best and we end the
report."

Pakistan Historical Revisionism

Why People Think Sandy Hook is a Conspiracy – The Creation of Revolutionary Times

Caption
Obama's former chief of staff, Rahm
Emanuel, reiterating in his own words what the founding first Prime
Minister of the Jewish State, David Ben-Gurion, had stated: “you
never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that
is an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do
before.” --- Rahm Israel Emanuel (at time 1m 3s)

And
this is what Rahm
Emanuel's father's
mentor, David Ben-Gurion, had originally explained
as the quintessential Machiavellian process
for implementing unpopular agendas during the violent creation of
Israel on Palestinian lands: “What
is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times;
and if at this time the opportunity is missed and what is possible at
such great hours is not carried out – a whole world is lost”
--- David Ben-Gurion

Project
Humanbeingsfirst has examined this nihilistic political science
principle at great length in its many
reports to help deconstruct not just the fiction
of 'War on Terror', but all crises that have besieged mankind since
9/11. See The
Poor-Man's Guide to Modernity.

Anatomy of Conspiracy Theory

Caption
American Government Response to Conspiracy Theories “Conspiracy
theories exist in the realm of myth, where imaginations run wild,
fears trump facts, and evidence is ignored. As a superpower, the
United States is often cast as a villain in
these dramas.”

Caption
Anatomy of Conspiracy Theory. NSC 10/2 directed CIA to conduct
“covert” rather than merely “psychological”
operations, defining them as all activities “which
are conducted or sponsored by this Government against hostile foreign
states or groups or in support of friendly foreign states or groups
but which are so planned and executed that any US Government
responsibility for them is not evident to unauthorized persons and
that if uncovered the US Government can plausibly disclaim any
responsibility for them.”
– Furthermore, in order to preempt such uncovering, to
continually seed red herrings and false theories; to delegitimize
their unraveling by labeling them as kookish “conspiracy
theories”; to defocus public energies by introducing
“beneficial cognitive diversity”, fabricated leaks
of half-truths which retain core-lies, and “Limited Hangout”
mea culpae, all fed through the “Mighty
Wurlitzer” messaging machinery; to brand the few daring and
persistent unravellers of “truth's protective layers”
as deniers of reality suffering from “emotional or mental
illness”, an “oppositional defiant disorder”
exhibiting a pattern of “negativistic, defiant, disobedient
and hostile behavior toward authority figures” and
therefore a threat to themselves and to society; and when all else
fails, to eliminate these 'malcontents' who refuse to tow the
official line by branding them “domestic terrorists”.

Some
may rationally ponder that how is it, that such a long running global
conspiracy for world government as outlined in Project
Humanbeingsfirst's report “The Enduring Capitalist
Conspiracy for World Government”, can be kept alive across
centuries and across geographies. This
brief paper examines that question.

Conspiracy or Theory?

“It is not a world that any of us would want to live in. Is such a world inevitable? It is not sure but there are two possible ways by which a world of 10 billion people can be averted. Either the current birth rates must come down more quickly or the current death rates must go up. There is no other way.”
--- Robert McNamara, Speech to International bankers as Head of the World Bank, October 2, 1970,

911 Revisited 2013 - The Evidence Once Again

Zahir's
take: Wonderful stuff! The technical analysis will surely
continue to be rehashed for another two hundred years. However, the
political analysis trumps it – just like Machiavelli trumps a
thousand brilliant scientists and engineers in every era– a prima facie “Operation Canned Goods” to
launch “imperial mobilization”.

That
half sentence worth of political analysis was done within the first
day by this scribe, and confirmed to his own conviction by re-reading
'The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich' and 'Mein Kampf',
followed by 'The Grand Chessboard – American Primacy And Its
Geostrategic Imperatives' and 'The Clash of Civilizations and
the Remaking of World Order', starting the very first week of
911. As he wrote in the Foreword
of Prisoners of the Cave:

“How
did I learn about these plans? I actually only uncovered PNAC,
JV2020, and the Wolfowitz’s chauvinist doctrines of preemption
that he had supposedly been pushing since 1990, after 911, when I
started scratching my head at the inexplicability of it all the
moment some 19 Muslim hijackers’ names were announced, and the
public was informed that they had learnt flying on flight simulators
and had told their instructors that they weren’t interested in
learning how to land! If Bin Laden was so smart at having planned
such an outrageous attack and counted on such brilliant executioners
who did it so flawlessly after only learning to fly on simulators, he
was pretty stupid at having enlisted idiots who would deliberately
leave such a trail of evidence behind, including statements that they
weren’t interested in landing – so that either they would
risk being uncovered before the attack, or their attack foiled while
in progress, or after a successful attack, America would know exactly
whom to go bomb in retaliation!

Only
one of these aspects could be true, either they were brilliant
military tacticians and strategists, or nincompoops from a three
stooges movie who succeeded despite themselves, but the incongruence
could not exist simultaneously on this large scale military style
invasion project, except in a Hollywood spoof.

Having
already read Brzezinski’s Grand Chessboard and Huntington’s
Clash of Civilizations several years earlier, I immediately grasped
the new pearl harbor concept the moment America deployed to bomb
Afghanistan without adequately explaining or investigating any of the
events of 911. ...

I
started to reread Brzezinski and Huntington very carefully once
again, then reread the entire voluminous Rise and Fall of the Third
Reich, and the Mein Kampf of Hitler. The similarities between the
rising crescendo of WMDs and the propaganda that William Shirer had
recorded as having transpired in the Third Reich, and the
similarities between ZB’s and Hitler’s descriptions of
their respective imperatives and how to get them, were ominous,
except that ZB’s were more polished and more sophisticatedly
put. I got really paranoid as many more light bulbs went on in my
head which had not gone on when I had originally read them. I had
just taken Brzezinski’s book as theoretical, as being from the
pen of a Cold War warrior now retired and indulging in some arm chair
warrior fantasies. I didn’t understand that hectoring hegemons
never retire until they are six feet under. I had also dismissed
Huntington’s book as an ignoramus's work not to be taken
seriously, as it was replete with obvious disinformation and tortuous
conclusions that were easy to spot by anyone who knew anything about
the subject. Now both were being egregiously put into practice, and
the latter’s book did not appear so silly anymore, but rather
shrewd and calculated.

The
first time I had read Huntington with the lens of ‘here is an
interestingly titled book from a prominent Harvard professor, let me
see what he has to say’; the second time I read it with the
lens ‘let me understand how deception is created and its seeds
planted in a free society that is not too knowledgeable about the
rest of the world’. The second reading showed that the
obviousness of his distortions, coming from a top branded American
University like Harvard, had some deeper strategic thinking behind
it. Huntington is also involved in national security and other
strategic studies as a prominent professor and intellectual at
Harvard, and couldn’t be just a simple moron like Harvard’s
President, Lawrence Summers, who recently claimed women were
inherently not as smart as men. I was wondering how people like that
become president at prestigious American universities, until once
again I uncovered during my research that the same Harvard President
had also written how the industrialized nations should dump their
waste in developing nations while he was at the World Bank in the
1990s. With Wolfowitz now as the head of the World Bank, it is only
shortsightedness to underestimate the power of the dark side, or the
people who wield it. Huntington’s theme from portions of his
book relevant to the topic at hand is systematically dismantled in
Chapter 9. Based on this new found respect of the doctrinal scholars
for their craft, and realizing that we were entering a phase with the
hastily approved Patriot Act I that could only lead to the Fourth
Reich in America, I started attending antiwar teachins and protest
marches with my family, and began talking to prominent Vietnam war
dissenters about governmental lies.

And
that is when I first heard about the PNAC – from antiwar
teachins. Ordinary people like me,
engagingly concerned about what was happening, had uncovered more
material from public sources and the analysis of history, than the
entire mainstream scholarship and media apparatus in the United
States of America.”

At
least now, 12 years later, get your collective heads out of your
brilliant technical analyses! Develop some political wherewithal
of hegemonic statecraft: could any nation, let alone ordinary people,
during the Third Reich, do anything about its Operation Canned Goods
to launch its quest for their Lebensraum, except to militarily
confront the Third Reich?

Why
do you think it is different for confronting the Fourth Reich; for
their new “Lebensraum” of world government?

Oh,
but the same guy who explains the legal definition of “conspiracy”
in the documentary above will rush to call that quest for world
government a “conspiracy theory” – but hopefully
not ( See Anatomy of Conspiracy Theory http://tinyurl.com/anatomy-of-conspiracy-theory ).

Here
is a funny fact: The same fellow who started the World Trade Center
project is also the exponent of world government. He is also the
former head of the Council on Foreign Relations which is driving the
agenda of Global Governance by open declaration of its modus
operandi: “an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it
piece by piece”.

And
here is another funny fact: No military interdiction to counter that
revived quest for a global “Lebensraum” is possible
today. World Government is a macro fait accompli.

A
few more “Operation Canned Goods” will surely be required
to incrementally induce micro fait accompli in baby steps, to piece
meal cement the journey in its each successive stage to make turning
back impossible or impractical from that stage, which brilliant
people will also continue to talk about for many more decades to
come.

That's
the great brilliance of the ever sleeping American mind chasing its
American Dream – never the ability to preempt abhorrence by
learning from history; only the belated “wakeup” to
continue talking about history, ex post facto, for years and years to
come. It is an entire industry. (Scroll down about mid way on this page and you will see: 'A strange cast of characters among 9/11 Truth Leadership' in the sidebar below)

Well,
guess what? Machiavelli knows that too: Convince People of
Absurdities and get them Acquiescing to Atrocities – the first
rule of hegemony when “democracy is inimical to imperial
mobilization”. Afterwards, if the public ever wakes up (when
their own burden becomes too high), its enlightened scholars,
scientists and historians, and the odd ball rebel of conscience can
study the fait accompli all they want:

“We’re
an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while
you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will —
we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can
study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re
history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to
just study what we do.” — Senior Bush Advisor, The
New York Times, October 17, 2004

Focus
on the political
science –
not the technical science! The political science is ancient, the
technical science is rapidly evolving. It
will continually create new technological demonstrations and most
imaginative catastrophes to shock and
awe the public mind, to repeatedly herd its instinct for
self-preservation into the same 'United We
Stand' state as was done on September 11, 2001. And
you, all of you, will be left to just study what they do.
Sun Tzu captured the obviousness of it with remarkable eloquence when
defining the characteristics of a true warrior in the Art of War 2500
years ago:

“To
lift an autumn hair is no sign of great strength; to see the sun and
moon is no sign of sharp sight; to hear the noise of thunder is no
sign of a quick ear.”

The
shrewd public warrior now finally awake from the American Dream and
into the American Nightmare, anticipates,
prepares, calculates, and preempts, rather than narrate
after the fact sheepishly clamoring for “New
Investigation” from the same wolves who slaughtered
the lamb in the first place! He astutely comes to understand the
“forces that drive them”
and formulates strategies to counter that, instead of chase their
myriad effects. As Bernard Lewis of Princeton University had
explained in his propaganda manual 'The Crisis of Islam –
Holy War and Unholy Terror' to reinvigorate the “doctrinal
motivation” for America's war on terror:

“Terrorism
requires only a few. Obviously the West must defend itself by
whatever means will be effective. But in
devising means to fight the terrorist, it would surely be useful to
understand the forces that drive them.”

911 Truth A Red Herring?

Caption
Professor Steven Jones of BYU (standing second from left) officially
appointed in 1989 by the President of the United States, George H.W.
Bush Sr., as an establishmentarian scientist to lead the DOE
investigation into the potentially revolutionizing discovery of Cold
Fusion. Can a George Bush Sr.’s trusted establishmentarian
scientist suddenly become a genuine dissenting scientist against the
same establishment in George Bush Jr.’s administration as
anything other than controlled opposition? Steven Jones immediately
rises to become the most prominent leader of 9/11 Truth seekers who
even want to award him the Nobel Peace Prize! Hmmm.... watch the
video above and click on the image of Steven Jones with Bush Sr. to
read more about his previous role in Cold Fusion. We learn from
history – or is that merely a cliché to use ex post
facto in pedantic papers and history books?

Caption
David Ray Griffin, the author of many famous books on 9/11 and the
'Dean of 9/11 Studies' according to many of his prominent
cheerleaders who claim inspiration from him, is a self-admitted
globalist seeking world government in the most eloquent Newspeak of
Orwellian Establishmentarians. Hmmm.... watch David Ray Griffin
proclaim world government in response to an audience question in the
video above

Caption
Vanilla or Chocolate is merely the icing on the devil's cake! Is the
brilliant Western intellect really so naive that it cannot see that
they all principally serve the same globalist agenda? Click on image

Is
this ten year old pursuit of what was already obvious on September
11, 2001, “Operation Canned Goods” look-alike, really
relevant to derailing “imperial mobilization” to
one-world government which was irrevocably launched by that super
terrorism of 9/11? Read what
was already obvious on day one.

Even
the Financial Times has argued that 9/11 finally enabled one-world
government: 'for the first time in my life, I think the
formation of some sort of world government is plausible. ... it is
increasingly clear that the most difficult issues facing national
governments are international in nature: there is global warming, a
global financial crisis and a “global war on terror”'!
Read Gideon
Rachman's 'And now for a world government'.

Hear
the bold proclamation on global
governance by the EU president: “2009 is
also the first year of global governance.... The climate conference
in Copenhagen is another step towards the global management of our
planet.”

The
only people who are evidently unaware of these real-world
developments, are the 9/11 Truth Movement born-again zealots –
or, at least, they seem to behave that way
when Pollyannaishly broaching their “new
investigation” treadmill.

I
haven't paid much attention to the 9/11 Truth Movement people because
I have found them patently silly in their prime demand: new
investigation. By who? Of what? There is no crime scene hard evidence
preserved. And when the judge, jury, executioner, sherif, and posse,
all work for the same club, the club of "imperial mobilization",
what sense does new investigation make? The only sense of a red
herring to keep more peoples occupied in specious pursuits, and
administering some additional Hegelian mind-fck towards eroding
national sovereignty by internationalizing the investigation, perhaps
under the auspices of the vaunted UN, as baby-step towards
accomplishing more world government. Now local crimes are
investigated by a global body – a justification solidified,
since none of the national authorities are deemed capable of it for
one reason or another! After my brief communication with the 9/11
Truth movement cheerleaders and scientists, I had given up on
anything useful coming out of this lot except hard runs on the
treadmills of inefficacy. And they are at it again.

What's
the point of the following stated agenda of the Toronto Hearings when
all Western governments and international agencies are conniving to
usher in world government which was enabled by 9/11: '(3) To
submit a record and a summary of the Hearings, together with signed
Statutory Declarations by witnesses, to relevant governments, groups
and international agencies with the request that a full and impartial
investigation be launched into the events of September 11, 2001'?

What
is this farce of presenting the obvious by the learned foxes in hen's
feathers to other foxes all pretending to guard the hen house amidst
the cheering hens?

Only
the sharp Western intellect can think of such absurdities and be
taken seriously by useful idiots! For others, please click to read:
The
Poor-Man's Guide to Modernity.

Please
see
the full deconstruction of why I no longer trust Steven Jones and his
coterie of Johnny come lately “experts” who have
instantly acquired a following as if they were “collection
agents” – and what have they been collecting?

I
would suggest that they have been shepherding the well-intentioned
conscionable peoples, citizens, anonymous good hearted folks, who
were and are waking up ex post facto of Iraq invasion of 2003, lest
the sheep wakeup too violently! Just get them to speciously
demand a “new investigation”!

I
wonder what these brilliant scholars and scientists and theologians
where doing in September-October of 2001 when Afghanistan was being
prepared to be bombed to smithereens? And in 2002-2003 when Iraq was
being prepared to be “shock and awe[d]”? But suddenly,
in 2004, these “experts” began to burst onto the public
scene to become leaders of other ordinary mortals not endowed with
brilliant titles like these scholars and scientists, who were also
waking up slowly to the commonsense reality that no WMDs were found
in Iraq? That steel buildings couldn't just collapse like that? It
took David Griffin to write the New Pearl Harbor three years after
9/11 when a simple attendance at any
anti-war teach-in during 2001-2003 protest
demonstrations would have informed anyone principled enough to oppose
the slaughter of innocent 'lesser peoples' of that fact?

Imagine
that Richard Gageadvertised
on his website, by implication of comparing Steven Jones to Linus
Pauling, that a Nobel Peace Prize might be in it for the new comer:
“Steven Jones' call for a "serious
investigation" of the hypothesis that the WTC 7 and the Twin
Towers were brought down, not just by impact damage and fire, but
through the use of pre-positioned cutter-charges" must be the
rallying cry for all building design experts to speak out. Dr. Jones
is following in the footsteps of Dr. Linus Pauling of the California
Institute of Technology, who rallied his fellow scientists to oppose
the development of the Hydrogen Bomb and the testing of nuclear
weapons. He was later awarded the 1962 Nobel Peace Prize for these
efforts.”

The
same Dr. Jones who is pictured with George H. W. Bush Sr., above,
being appointed by the heralder of the “New
World Order” to scuttle the discovery of Cold Fusion? No –
must be some other fellow.

But
still, Nobel Peace Prize for what?

For
co-opted fools and mercenaries without conscience suffering from the
superiority complex of silently watching the spectacle of genocidal
slaughter of the 'untermenschen' on their telly and not uttering a
public word of protest while Afghanistan and Iraq were decimated
with “shock and awe”?

Or,
for being further set-up as glorified “collection agents”
for type-2 ordinary citizens; to attract those ordinary peoples who
are finally waking up to the reality that 9/11 was an “Operations
Canned Goods” as they
lose their own skirts and shirts while their own nation descends
into a police state? No they didn't protest when it was happening to
that other fellow over there, but Machiavelli knows that they will
protest when it starts happening to them
right here at home. He is ready!

See
this
report
to understand “type-2” and the political science of
manufacturing dissent as an integral part of social engineering of
consent. “Type-2” is Adolph Hitler's categorizing
of people who “wake up”, who were formerly “type-1”,
the flag-waiving and/or silent bystanders of mainstream with their
full faith in their government. They suddenly “wake up”
with lost faith in government. Virtually the entire majority of “9/11
Truth Movement” rank and file appear to be mainstream waked-up
citizens whose newly awakened conscience and skepticism is being
corralled into expending their energies on
specious pursuits of what is already a fait accompli. All “type-2”.

These
good and noble citizens of empire, benefiting from its loot and
plunder of the rest of the world – ahem,
the hidden hand of the market backed by the hidden fist, as Thomas
Freidman put it in the NYT – in what
became known as the 'American Dream' (see Unveiling
America's Secret History),
can no more think independently without a pied piper leading them as
the new dissentstream, than they could as the silent majority of
mainstream. In either case they must be led. They look to “experts”.
So “experts” are provided to them. And led they are, to
the same pastures of ensuring that fait accompli of “imperial
mobilization” is not impacted by their loss in faith in
government. Read the aforementioned report
to perceptively understand this straightforward mechanism of
predatory statecraft in Western “democracies”.

And
read this
analysis
to acutely comprehend the concept of fait
accompli and the role of absurdities in political
science. Unless you can insightfully understand that, and shrewdly
begin to identify and eschew your fabricated leaders who are now your
new pied-pipers, you will never comprehend how you are being taken
for a ride no differently than when you were part of the flag-waiving
mainstream! And it doesn't matter how many credentials you have, or
what your station in life is. These matters are not decided by
socio-economic, race, or class status, but by indoctrination and
ability to think independently.
Both of which are entirely wealth and college degrees agnostic.

For
today's dissent-chiefs: It doesn't matter if you have a Ph.D.
from MIT or Caltech – the Nazi Scientists, hard and soft,
meaning, from physicists to
social-psychologists, were far more
brilliant than many coveting the Nobel prize in Physics in America
today. And they stood United with their Führer
too, at the peak of the Third Reich's hubris. Then they came
over to America as defeated brilliance, often under new identities –
“Operation Paperclip” – to run your science in
America, blithely stating, and believing,
as is famously quoted from the father of the rocket who ended up
heading NASA to send America to the moon: “our job is to
send it up, what does it matter where it comes down.”

If
you didn't speak-out then, didn't protest
then, didn't put your jobs and your life on the line in orchestrating
nation-wide protests of the kind witnessed during the tail-end of the
Vietnam War when your own peoples' body-bags were in ample display –
a lesson many of you learnt while still in college during that most
recent yesteryear – and you are suddenly prominent
dissent-leaders today having silently watched tens of thousands of
innocent 'lesser' civilians not even get a used body-bag, never mind
a Muslim burial in DU soaked lands, I have to wonder about this sham.

It
can only succeed in brain-washed, or perhaps brain-dead America!

The
compromising image above, and the admission of being a globalist
pitching the very message that David Rockefeller, the Council on
Foreign Relations, the EU president, et. al., have been pitching
loudly and publicly, indeed since the very founding of the Federal
Reserve Bank that generations of bankster oligarchy
has been pitching, condemn you as the vile assets of the Mighty
Wurlitzer
in the service of empire.

You
only fool type-2, your primary mission.

Sorry
– no brownie points for the silly Toronto Hearings. If you are
genuine, you must prove it.

There
is no reason for anyone to assume anything of anyone in an age when
“deception is the state of mind and the mind of State”.

Convincingly
answer the questions raised here by one whose 'lesser peoples' and
civilizations have been bombed by your very first silence – and
by the hubris of your elected representatives who “United We
Stand” with their purse-strings right alongside your government
which you install and replace every four years without a damn
change occurring
while you continually believe like damn
fools that you are getting a change
while the winner earns the 2008
Marketer of the Year award–
before you head off to fool many more men and women of conscience on
this Toronto journey. Stop fooling yourselves first, if indeed that's
what this is and not controlled dissent to run the fed-up
public on glamorized treadmills for a healthy democratic exercise of
the conscience.

Why
should damn fool “leaders” be welcomed by ordinary
peoples? Damn fools who are asking the same ruling powers to
investigate a fait accompli – like asking the robber to
investigate his own crime, and the judge is the robber's father, the
jury are his fraternity all having benefited from their brother's
crime, and the other rulers being appealed to are part of the same
Mafioso pact?

Of
course, I hope I am wrong. That damn fools will turn out to be wise
savants! So show me the effective and practical path to derailing
“imperial mobilization” from your silly obsession
with unraveling the mysteries of “Operation Canned Goods”
and I will be converted to your religion.

Just
Look at the absurdity of this obsession in the larger global context:

the
invasion of Poland is a fait accompli;

the
slaughters of the 'lesser peoples' are
continuing on both the Eastern and the Western front; France and
Western Europe is militarily occupied;

the
Allied fire-bombings of occupied cities and Germany is at its peak
killing more innocent civilians in the most atrocious
manner than those killed by the Nazis in their hideous concentration
camps;

Nuremberg
is a distant memory;

the
next nations to fall to “democracy” and “revolutions”
in prelude to invasion and occupation, are along the rapidly
expanding “arc of crisis” in the “global
zone of percolating violence” and already visible;

and
some brilliant scholars are discussing the how-tos of “Operation
Canned Goods”?

An
even greater absurdity is that these wise savants are making appeals
to the Reich's henchmen installed all across the world for a “new
investigation” of “Operation Canned Goods”?

And
the greatest absurdity of it all is that
they don't see that “Operation Canned Good”
enabled the world government of Mein Führer's
long-held dream, and all rulers in the dominion
are now his lieutenants?

Those
absurdities can only happen in two places in all of creation:

One,
in Alice in Wonderland – the creation of the fertile
imagination of an allegorical novelist for school children's reading
pleasure and adult contemplation.

Two,
in a nation so dumbed-down that they can no longer even use an iota
of commonsense to rationally add two plus two to come up with four –
the creation of the diabolical imagination
of Machiavelli and its social engineers to ensure that the
self-inflated with superiority-complex public continually look only
towards designated “experts” for the answer to even
simple arithmetic, to be happy when they invariably get “five”,
and run helter-skelter with their new discovery!

911 and Imperial Mobilization Redux

.“911
is is a point of departure for me ... I see the deliberate hands of
the American-Israeli intelligence agencies and/or “Second
Foundationers” from deep within the American ruling elite
in orchestrating this New Pearl Harbor. For a country that can
sense what is deep within the bowels of the Earth and in the farthest
reaches of the heavens, that seeks “full spectrum dominance”
of air, land, sea, space, cyberspace, et. al. in its own military
doctrines, and that publicly warns in its strategy documents that the
only way for it to embark on this “imperial mobilization”
is an increased military budget that can only come about in a “new
pearl harbor”, 9-11 has only one reality –
self-inflicted. --- Chapter
2: Don't Ever Ask “Why is it possible to hate America”
Prisoners of the Cave

.“I
am betting that when knowledge of the crime of the emperor comes to
them, and their complicity in it is realized by them, that like Lady
Macbeth, the American public will be torn by their good conscience,
that they will be as unable to remain “innocent of
knowledge” as Lady Macbeth, and will endeavor to right the
wrongs done in their name by their successive governments. As
Arundhati Roy put it in a speech: “Yours is by no means a
great nation – but you could be a great people – history
is giving you the chance – seize the time.” I am
betting that the conscience of its own people will prove to be the
real fifth column in the United States of America. Perhaps somewhat
idealistic, but it is precisely ideals that seem to be lacking in the
collective wisdom of this nation, where mostly everything is viewed
from the distorted prism of the pragmatic, the expeditious, the
instantly gratifying, and the “might makes right”
imperial sight. Its injection into the American polity cannot be a
bad thing. I don't expect everyone to necessarily agree with my work,
the point of it being not to make you agree with me, but to motivate
you into examining your invisible chains in the hope that if you
earnestly look for them, you will likely find them. --- Postscript
Prisoners of the Cave

And just as his
predecessors did, President
OBAMA too reiterates who the enemy is,
even threatening the public to not question America's official sacred
story of who the enemy is, and cleverly lumping “questioning
9/11” with “justifying 9/11”

.“I
am aware that there is still some who would question, or even justify
the offense of 911.

But
let us be clear. Al Qaeeda killed nearly 3000 people on that day. The
victims were innocent men, women, and children from America and many
other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody.

And
yet Al Qaeeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit
for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a
massive scale.

They
have affiliates in many countries, to try to expand their reach.

These
are not opinions to be debated. These are facts to be dealt with.

And,
by the verdict of your own logic of 3000 innocent victims killed by
“Al-Qaeeda” on 9/11, what of the several
million INNOCENT CIVILIAN VICTIMS barbarically murdered by the United
States in Afghanistan and Iraq in retaliation
for 9/11?

And
as the sighted can already see, like the “Big
Brother” of OCEANIA,
the rulers of United States of America using their own Newspeak and
the savagery of fabricated wars against “barbarians”,
transformed their own nation into a Police State while its
indoctrinated masses, its pathetic “House Negroes” and
immigrant “Uncle Toms”,
insanely
cheered“United We Stand”
against Islamofascism.

.“The
system is not only broken, it was crippled at birth – for it is
so easily hijackable – from Wounded Knee to Iran, with new
“Pearl Harbors” cleverly used for “imperial
mobilization” from the USS Maine to 911 to the new nookular
'911' that President Bush keeps warning the Americans and the world
about in these ominous words as late as February 13, 2008: “Good
morning [America]. At this moment, somewhere in the world, terrorists
are planning new attacks on our country. Their goal is to bring
destruction to our shores that will make September the 11th pale by
comparison.” It is one continuous predatory imperative,
from the Truman Doctrine, to the Carter Doctrine, to
the Reagan Doctrine, and now to the Bush Doctrine. What
did impeachment of Richard Nixon ever accomplish or deter, never mind
restore to America's millions of untold and unaccounted victims in
Asia and South America? --- How
to derail “imperial mobilization” and preempt the
crossing of the Nuclear Rubicon

.“What
is the point of this analysis and all this verbage? The point is a
matter of life and death for nations. That is the point of this. Let
me be very precise. Either the United States, or Israel,
are poised to attack Iran, as
noted by many commentators in the World press,... This is
March 2007. I have two imperatives before me: A) I do not wish to
hear in 2010 that there was an “intelligence failure”,
that it was another Gulf of Tonkin, or some other new contrivance
from the imaginative and fertile mind of the hectoring hegemons.
--- Dialog
Among Civilizations – Whytalksfail When the Hectoring Hegemons
Are Running It And What To Do About It

Since
the doctrines of aggression variously couched in Newspeak have
remained the same despite the changing presidential faces in the
White House, the AMERICAN PUBLIC'S REALPOLITIK to
bravely extract their nation from the jaws of Big Brother's
Fourth Reich also remains the
same:

1)
Firstly, anything, including all 'nuclear terrorist acts' on American
soil, or anywhere in the world, all shocking revelations by
whistleblowers, all leaks in newspapers, and all phantasmal mantras
that distract from the afore-stated goal, regardless of how
compelling the reasons, must be treated by the unwary and gullible
American public and its intellectual dissenting-chiefs, as red
herrings, pretexts, and deceptions for premeditated “imperial
mobilization” by their nation's rulers.

2)
Secondly, if there is reason for the United States to nuclear
decimate any country or any peoples in purported 'self-defense', the
American peoples must demand a ratification of the decision to go to
war through a public referendum – let its great “populist
democracy” speak directly in the modernity of the 21st century
before it is called upon to make its sacrifices, before it is called
upon to pay its taxes to fund the war, and before it is called upon
to acquire innocent blood on its hands!

3)
Thirdly, draw the soldiers, officers and war-technicians from the
pool who vote for war! If they can vote yes to invade other nations
and wantonly shatter the tabula rasa of a 'lesser humanity', then
they must also first be willing to sign up for doing it themselves –
instead of having a draft of economic conscription. Every 'yes'
voting home in America must have at least one 'patriot' from the
immediate family show up on the front-lines without exception –
or their 'yes' vote is void!

In
reference to your complaint filed with the ICC against the previous
errand-boys who occupied the White House, would it be rude to notice
that the higher order bits of using 911 to “goosestep the
herrenvolk across international frontiers” ; the
subsequent “shock and awe” visitations upon
largely civilian population-centers and civilian
infrastructures ; the decimation of millions of Iraqis/Afghanis
; subverting of the United States into a pre-planned police-state ;
fabricating crises upon crises to propose pre-planned solutions in
order to systematically usurp national sovereignty
as per the diabolical modus operandi set by the Council on Foreign
Relations in their own documents: “In short, the ‘house
of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up,
rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming,
buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous
description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty,
eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the
old-fashioned frontal assault.” – have all been
overlooked to pursue the relatively lower order crimes of
“extraordinary rendition” upon a few individuals
with the highly dubious statement: “I doubt very seriously
that the Accused would have inflicted these criminal practices upon
100 White Judeo-Christian men.”?

We
only wish there was one decent 'Christian' man or woman alive in the
hallways and beltways of Western academe and among the legal
fraternity who might even attempt to
capture the angst of the tens of millions of Iraqis/Afghanis still
barely alive and who still await someone who will file legal charges
against the monumental crimes that have been perpetrated upon them
and their millions of murdered kin.

We
fervently hope that you, Professor Francis Boyle, might be such a
person. That you will file pertinent charges in the ICC, for both
culpability and restitution, on behalf of the untold millions already
dead in Iraq and Afghanistan, many more suffering with their entire
national fabric, ancient heritage, and even their DNA despoiled in a
crime so stupendous that “it is a mystery whose parallel
may only be the one of Sinai when something was revealed to mankind.”

For
surely, it is inconceivable that you make
complete obeisance to Western standards of
morality by focussing on this lower order crime in the presence
of un-addressed higher order monumental
crimes – a morality which brazenly asserts from the highest
pulpit of law in this land of the free:

“Nothing
is more certain in modern society than the principle that there are
no absolutes, that a name, a phrases, a standard has meaning only
when associated with the considerations which give birth to
nomenclature. To those who would paralyze our Government in the face
of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we
must reply that all concepts are relative.” -- Justice
Vinson, U.S. Supreme Court, 1951 AD

And
as you venture to focus on the higher order real monumental crimes
against humanity, we hope you will not remain content by focussing
merely on the errand boys. That you will see the connections between
the quest for “Global
Governance”, fabricated crises from
pandemics
to global
warming, the seeding of “revolutionary times”across the “global zone of percolating violence”
to make “imperial
mobilization” possible
which otherwise is “inconceivable in normal times”,
and the “history's
actors” who drive war-mongering
policies and orchestrate wretched events from their Zion in the
Middle East to their Zion in the Western capitals, not the least of
which is Washington DC, in the expectation
of creating the ultimate “Zion
that will light up all the world”.

And
that, as you pursue the highest order crimes, you will not shy away
from going directly for the jugular of the prime-movers behind the
scenes of all the war-mongering 'errand boys' fronting for them in
the Western capitals as the duly elected representatives of a duped
Western peoples, including those presently occupying the White House.
This was, lamentably enough, already pleaded to no avail in the
following editorial when your lonely fraternal brother, Mr. Vincent
Bugliosi, courageously asserted that
“Murder
Trumps Torture”, but inexplicably failed to also
simultaneously assert the legal and moral commonsense that
prime-movers trump trigger-pullers: Who
is more guilty of monumental war crimes - the prime-movers or trigger
pullers? April 09, 2009.

Attempted
prosecution of state-criminals on 'petty
charges' without also prosecuting their criminal
aiders and abettors who 'legalize' and propagandistically
justify their brazen acts of aggression, and therefore are entirely
culpable in toto for “all the evil which follows” ;
staying silent on punitive as well restitutive
compensation for their victims, is a legal sham that is only waiting
to be torn down by some courageous people. We hope, Dr. Francis
Boyle, that you might be one such precedent setting spark which
ignites the moral imagination of many to
follow. The world has had enough from the dispensers of victor's
justice!

Additionally,
in principle, Project Humanbeingsfirst.org supports all effective
measures which attempt to bring the entire hierarchy of monumental
criminals to fair justice. As is often the case with victor's justice
however, and with those in the victor civilizations pursuing their
notion of justice against the criminals in their own midst, the big
picture is being silently swept aside in the “Bush To The
Hague!” Campaign. That moral campaign should rightly be
“Bush-Obama-Congress-Foundations-Banksters To The Hague”
Campaign. And a similarly appropriate one waged in the UK and the EU.

It
is not sufficient, in the view of Project Humanbeingsfirst, to pursue
lower order crimes and charge the lower-order errand boys for these
crimes, while staying eloquently silent on the most significant
crimes and neglecting to seek
restitution/compensation/punitive-damages for the most significant of
its victims! While the old errand boys out of power are being pursued
with vigor, a new crop of errand boys are already in-charge
committing new monumental crimes without inhibition. What rational
commonsense does this make? Are we to presume that morality in
modernity is inversely proportional to rationality and commonsense?
That millions of 'untermensch' victims are to simply remain nameless
and faceless statistics to build careers and glossy prize-winning
narratives on? We certainly hope not!

To
put efficacy into the matter of stopping crimes against humanity
before they transpire rather than lament in futility afterwards with
vacuous pledges of 'never again' with
Public Relations show trials and new museums, the perpetual
prime-movers of wars pushing their insidious multifaceted agendas
behind the turbulence of wars have to be neutered. Their enormous
power and influence stemming from their infinite wealth that is
legally sanctioned to them by the law makers who represent them in
governance, terminated. Where is the precedent for that being set?

It
wasn't even set at the Nuremberg Military Tribunals when Dr. Hjalmar
Schacht, the former governor of the Reich Bank – the bankster
who orchestrated the financing for Hitler's war-machine with funding
from Wall Street and the City of London financiers – went
scot-free! Just that tiny point of incontrovertible fact proves the
truth of this open letter and demonstrates the enormous power of the
prime-movers which is being swept under the rug by focussing on their
errand boys. These errand boys are untouchable so long as their
godfathers protect them, except when made dispensable and
administered the victor's justice as at the Nuremberg Trials.

Down Memory Lane Ten Years Later 2003 to 2013

"I don't believe that the majority of the American public, which the outside world perceives as self-serving for their self-indulgent pursuits of the “American Dream”, are quite like that. I don't believe that they are out to get the world, nor do I believe that they “knowingly” turn a blind eye to the machinations of their government, unlike how most of the world's populations might perceive them.

I believe that the American public is genuinely deceived, incredibly indoctrinated, and purposely and systematically kept ignorant. And that their condition of “ignorance” is the outcome of their institutional ruling elite finding this to be the most efficient way to conduct the “imperial” business of the state, because otherwise, “democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization”.

These are the main assumptions in my book. I guess if you don't agree with them, then you are only left with the first alternative, that the American public is indeed incredibly self-serving, and consequently morally guilty of war crimes against humanity for their role in knowingly aiding and abetting their government in this fictitious “war on terrorism”. Take your pick." ---America’s Shame - 2003!

"Wake up sleeping and complacent America!

It may have started with the Muslims, but it will not end there. You might be next. Fascism usually starts against a minority group, because it is easier to tolerate since it is only happening to those “damn Arabs” – not to us – how did our oil get under their sand anyway? But the laws that are getting on the books in the persecution of the minority, tend to stay there for a long time.

If not you, then your children will surely pay the price. Are the Bill of Rights so trivial that you can stay silent? If not for reasons of compassion for another, then at least for the logic of self preservation, do not let this injustice prevail." ---They dared to knock on my door - 2003

Everyone has their Polyannish moments - right?

What others say

“you are a completely stupid fool, a disgrace to humanity”

---
Paul Craig Roberts, United States Former Assistant Secretary of the
Treasury, honoring Mr. Zahir Ebrahim, December
06, 2008

Latest Books

Bird's Eye View

The Public Mind

Edward
Bernays On The Public Mind:

“We
are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas
suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.”

Aldous
Huxley On The Public Mind:

“we
are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will
enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and
presumably always will exist, to get people actually to love their
servitude!”

Bertrand
Russell On The Public Mind:

“What
a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index to his
desires – desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If
a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts [or
worldview], he will scrutinize it closely, and unless [and at times
even when] the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe
it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a
reason for acting in accordance with his instincts [or worldview], he
will accept it even on the slenderest evidence.”

Adolf
Hitler On The Public Mind:

“Not
infrequently it is a case of overcoming ingrained prejudices which
are mostly unconscious and are supported by sentiment rather than
reason.

It
is a thousand times more difficult to overcome this barrier of
instinctive aversion, emotional hatred and preventive dissent than to
correct opinions which are founded on defective or erroneous
knowledge.

False
ideas and ignorance may be set aside by means of instruction, but
emotional resistance never can.”

“One
must also remember that of itself the multitude is mentally inert,
that it remains attached to its old habits and that it is not
naturally prone to read something which does not conform with its own
pre-established beliefs when such writing does not contain what the
multitude hopes to find there.

Therefore,
some piece of writing which has a particular tendency is for the most
part read only by those who are in sympathy with it.”

“The
deluge of papers and books published by the intellectual circles year
after year passed over the millions of the lower social strata like
water over glazed leather.”

“The
great majority of a nation is so feminine in its character and
outlook that its thought and conduct are ruled by sentiment rather
than by sober reasoning.

This
sentiment, however, is not complex, but simple and consistent. It is
not highly differentiated, but has only the negative and positive
notions of love and hatred, right and wrong, truth and falsehood. Its
notions are never partly this and partly that.

English
propaganda [during World War I] especially understood this in a
marvellous way and put what they understood into practice.

They
allowed no half-measures which might have given rise to some doubt.

Proof
of how brilliantly they understood that the feeling of the masses is
something primitive was shown in their policy of publishing tales of
horror and outrages which fitted in with the real horrors of the
time, thereby cleverly and ruthlessly preparing the ground for moral
solidarity at the front, even in times of great defeats.

Further,
the way in which they pilloried the German enemy as solely
responsible for the war--which was a brutal and absolute
falsehood--and the way in which they proclaimed his guilt was
excellently calculated to reach the masses, realizing that these are
always extremist in their feelings.

And
thus it was that this atrocious lie was positively believed.”

“Generally,
readers of the Press can be classified into three groups:

First,
those who believe everything they read;

Second,
those who no longer believe anything;

Third,
those who critically examine what they read and form their judgments
accordingly.

Numerically,
the first group is by far the strongest, being composed of the broad
masses of the people. Intellectually, it forms the simplest portion
of the nation. It cannot be classified according to occupation but
only into grades of intelligence.

Under
this category come all those who have not been born to think for
themselves or who have not learnt to do so and who, partly through
incompetence and partly through ignorance, believe everything that is
set before them in print.

To
these we must add that type of lazy individual who, although capable
of thinking for himself out of sheer laziness gratefully absorbs
everything that others had thought over, modestly believing this to
have been thoroughly done.

The
influence which the Press has on all these people is therefore
enormous; for after all they constitute the broad masses of a nation.
But, somehow they are not in a position or are not willing personally
to sift what is being served up to them; so that their whole attitude
towards daily problems is almost solely the result of extraneous
influence.

The
second group is numerically smaller, being partly composed of those
who were formerly in the first group and after a series of bitter
disappointments are now prepared to believe nothing of what they see
in print. They hate all newspapers. Either they do not read them at
all or they become exceptionally annoyed at their contents, which
they hold to be nothing but a congeries of lies and misstatements.

These
people are difficult to handle; for they will always be sceptical of
the truth. Consequently, they are useless for any form of positive
work.

The
third group is easily the smallest, being composed of real
intellectuals whom natural aptitude and education have taught to
think for themselves and who in all things try to form their own
judgments, while at the same time carefully sifting what they read.

They
will not read any newspaper without using their own intelligence to
collaborate with that of the writer and naturally this does not set
writers an easy task.

Journalists
appreciate this type of reader only with a certain amount of
reservation.

Hence
the trash that newspapers are capable of serving up is of little
danger--much less of importance--to the members of the third group of
readers. In the majority of cases these readers have learnt to regard
every journalist as fundamentally a rogue who sometimes speaks the
truth.

Most
unfortunately, the value of these readers lies in their intelligence
and not in their numerical strength, an unhappy state of affairs in a
period where wisdom counts for nothing and majorities for everything.

Nowadays
when the voting papers of the masses are the deciding factor; the
decision lies in the hands of the numerically strongest group; that
is to say the first group, the crowd of simpletons and the credulous.”

“Particular
attention should be paid to the Press; for its influence on these
people is by far the strongest and most penetrating of all; since its
effect is not transitory but continual. Its immense significance lies
in the uniform and persistent repetition of its teaching.

Here,
if anywhere, the State should never forget that all means should
converge towards the same end.

It
must not be led astray by the will-o'-the-wisp of so-called 'freedom
of the Press', or be talked into neglecting its duty, and withholding
from the nation that which is good and which does good.

With
ruthless determination the State must keep control of this instrument
of popular education and place it at the service of the State and the
Nation.”

“No
matter what an amount of talent employed in the organization of
propaganda, it will have no result if due account is not taken of
these fundamental principles.

Propaganda must be limited to a few
simple themes and these must be represented again and again. Here, as
in innumerable other cases, perseverance is the first and most
important condition of success.”

AND:
This is How the Mighty
Wurlitzer
does all of that to construct the Fourth Reich:

What
is the 'Mighty Wurlitzer'?

It
used to be the honorific of Frank Wisner, the first chief of
political warfare for the Central Intelligence Agency, used to
describe the C.I.A.’s plethora of front organizations and
newsmedia stooges that he was capable of playing (like a great organ
with many keyboards) for synthesizing any propaganda tune that was
needed for the day. See Operation Mockingbird (
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKmockingbird.htm
) (PDF).

The
fact that such an omnipresent Message-Machine is not ancient history
but very much current affairs, is underscored by this NYT headline
“Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand”,
Sunday, April
20, 2008
( http://tinyurl.com/6qhgfg
). Also see Jessica
Lynch
Media Myth-Making in Iraq War during Operation “Iraqi
Freedom” in Further
Study.

Caption
The Mighty Wurlitzer Organ: Metaphor for the Multi-Modal Propaganda
Message-Machine which can Play Many Perception-Molding Tunes
Simultaneously to Make the Public Mind

Therefore,
today, I use the term 'Mighty Wurlitzer' as a metaphor to
pluralistically refer to the same message-machine, i.e., the
intelligence apparatus for manufacturing consent and controlling
dissent, and its concomitant conscious manipulation of peoples'
thoughts, feelings, actions and in-actions, in order to serve the
primacy interests of the behind the scene governing oligarchy. The
latter are, invariably, also the de facto owners of the complete
messaging-system now even more globally ubiquitous than when Frank
Wisner played the world for a fool.

This
'grand organ' is now able to even more effectively synthesize,
implant, and reinforce, all the right set of beliefs (myths) among
the entire world's public – by suitably combining 'events' with
imaginative 'expos' writing – which appropriately primes the
world populations to acquiesce to the oligarchic agendas. While
playing this orchestra is now an integral part of all state-craft,
its major musical themes are entirely determined by the behind the
scenes owners of the system. While some might refer to the underlying
techniques as propaganda and psy-ops, 'Mighty Wurlitzer' singularly
captures the messaging-system controlled under a unified purpose of
command which is both highly compartmentalized and cellularized. Only
the Mighty Wurlitzer knows the entire tune.

What
this means is that not all who willingly cooperate with the Mighty
Wurlitzer in synchronistically humming its themes are knowingly being
purveyors of its myths and deception. Many of its most shrill echoers
are often well intentioned functionaries who are fed different
motivating myths at different levels in the hierarchy –
sometimes the lie is different at every level – such that it
suitably motivates each according to their own predilection,
professional station, and mission statement.

How
can one see through the psyops of the Mighty Wurlitzer?

As
daunting as it might appear to the mainstream television watcher, it
is in fact rather straightforward for those unencumbered by blind
faith in governments and its statecraft.

Just
look for the core-lies and unquestioned axioms of empire that are
typically retained in the “leaks” and reportage which, in
order to sound credible, often openly expose what is mostly already
known anyway or judiciously employ some variation of “Limited
Hangout”
wrapped in a veneer of dissent, 'freedom of the press', and often
accompanied by the facade of angst and opposition from the state.

Furthermore,
look for some of the lauded dissent names rushing to support the
Limited Hangout – just as it was with Daniel Ellsberg for his
infamous Pentagon Papers – to afford a veneer of
legitimacy to the whistleblowing revelations of supposed
state-secrets having caused some great harm to the state. The
extravagance enacted in the mainstream media, alternately making
heroes of the whistleblowers and demonizing them, is a giveaway to
the circus show being enacted for plebeian consumption.

For,
it matters not which side one takes, as both sides are patently
false, crafted of calculated omissions and half-truths that retain
core-lies, right out of the text book of the Technique
of Infamy
: invent two lies and keep the public busy debating which of them
is true!

The
role of crafty omissions in fabricating propaganda was best captured
by Aldous Huxley in his Preface to Brave New World thusly:

‘The
greatest triumphs of propaganda have been accomplished, not by doing
something, but by refraining from doing. Great is truth, but still
greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth. By
simply not mentioning certain subjects, by lowering what Mr.
Churchill calls an “iron curtain” between the masses
and such facts or arguments as the local political bosses regard as
undesirable, totalitarian propagandists have influenced opinion much
more effectively than they could have done by the most eloquent
denunciations, the most compelling of logical rebuttals. But silence
is not enough. If persecution, liquidation and the other symptoms of
social friction are to be avoided, the positive sides of propaganda
must be made as effective as the negative.’ — Aldous
Huxley, Preface (circa 1946) to Brave New World, 1931, Harper, pg. 11

To
uncover omissions in a discourse is very difficult for the public who
do not often have command over the domain in which the falsehoods are
being perpetuated. As the psychological insight already quoted above
from the Terrorism Study Group betrays, “'Public
Assumptions' Shape Views of History. Such presumptions are beliefs
(1) thought to be true (although not necessarily known to be true
with certainty), and (2) shared in common within the relevant
political community.”

Which
is why inculcating ignorance, especially political-historical
ignorance pertaining to international relations, and being made
trusting of authority figures and the state, are the pre-requisites
for any vile propaganda to succeed! A well bred lack of skepticism to
authority figures, to experts in scientific disciplines, and to
dissenting chiefs playing controlled opposition, thus becomes the
heart of social engineering for 'United We Stand'.

This
surfeit of blind trust in authority is what is ultimately harvested
by the Mighty Wurlitzer. For a skeptical public, the tunes of the
Mighty Wurlitzer would fall on very deaf ears and public governance
for private agendas would be well-nigh impossible in democratic
nations. This is qualitatively no different than the power exercised
by the religious clergy upon their faithful flock in any religion.
Except that modernity has perniciously replaced them with
multi-faceted secular clergies, the “experts”, each
demanding obedience from its own 'United We Stand' trusting flock in
all aspects of modern life.

This
is also why “leaking” information from “experts”
and “insiders” commands such a premium in Machiavellian
democratic statecraft. When used judiciously so as not to dilute its
impact, it can herd the flock in pretty much any direction that is
desired.

As
further empirically evidenced in the forensic analysis presented
here, these so called whistleblowing of leaky buckets also
succeed in accomplishing two important elements of statecraft:

vicariously
reinvigorate in the short-term public memory, the already
established-by-fiat facts and core-axioms of empire;

establish
new convenient facts on the ground which are subsequently accepted
as revealed gospel truths because of the already established
thought-stream by the scholars of empire that when something is held
in secret or is classified and subsequently declassified, or is
prematurely leaked to the public, that it must contain some genuine
“state secrets”, and never red herrings. Such
thought-streams enable the directives of NSC 10/2 for plausible
deniability (and those like it which we do not know about) to be
trivially impressed upon the public mind (see Anatomy
of Conspiracy Theory).
These revelations of presumed “state-secrets”
subsequently become the new unquestioned backdrops for both state
policies and public discourses – the new “doctrinal
motivations” – with copious help from the Mighty
Wurlitzer's refined machinery.

This
enables the successful deployment of already pre-planned policy
prescriptions which craftily impel the various incantations of
hegemony forward in baby-steps. Both, domestically by incrementally
clamping down hard on rising discontent in the name of “national
security”, and internationally by continuing to wage unpopular
wars of preemption upon the 'untermenschen'. The infernal enemy has
now been (re)confirmed to exist (despite popular skepticism) since
even empire's own henchmen in their secret documents also affirm that
belief (sic!). Speak of self-servingly suffering from a incestuously
self-reinforced “crippled epistemology”!

What
appears to be out of control Terrorism worldwide in 2014, and which
is continuing to extract its pound of flesh from the
sovereignty of nation-states faster than any other global crisis to
date, can easily be comprehended when NATO's Operation Gladio of
yesteryear is employed as the political science template. The
motivations and the forces that drive global terrorism is writ large
in that most empirical exposure of state sponsored terror disguised
as “insurgency”. To make it believable and plausible,
real insurgents are created, and existing insurgent groups,
especially those with existential discontents, are infiltrated, and
their destructive energies channeled in service of larger political
agendas of which often the patsies themselves remain unaware of. The
evidence from CIA's
MK ULTRA program of yesteryear, and the empirical
suicide bombings in the terrorism acts
today, indicate to those who can observe rationally with even an iota
of brain functioning, that the art of manufacturing the perfect
Manchurian Candidate has been perfected. And so has its
deployment on demand as in Operation Gladio.

No
intelligence apparatus in any country, no news media, no
establishmentarian politician to scholar to military man, nor any of
the touted intellectuals playing dissent with the establishment's
narratives, go there. Why not? Because there are always substantial
tangible and intangible, as well as existential rewards to be gained
by silence. It is always beneficial to continue to play the fool, the
patsy, and the willing mercenary. See: Operation
Gladio Yesterday and Worldwide Terrorism Today – Identifying
the Enemy,
and Imperial
Surrogates and 'Terror Central' in Operation Gladio Redux.
See The
Dying Songbird to comprehend the co-option of the
intellectuals and how they diabolically mislead and misdirect the
public conscience. They shall all be ceremoniously anointed “arguably
the most important truth-tellers and intellectuals” tomorrow
for their brilliant ex post facto exposés
of the state deceptions of today, just as they are heralded today for
their dry study of yestercentury and its
war crimes.

That
is the real import of the craftsmanship of the Mighty Wurlitzer!
To engineer a fait accompli by manufacturing consent among the
gullible masses and controlling dissent among the rabble rousers when
“imperial mobilization” is still on-going, leaving
future scholars, historians, and the odd malcontent to laudingly
study the ashes, mea culpae, confessions, documentaries,
de-classified documents, and strategic rattings
left behind by “history's actors”. A diabolical
modus operandi of democratic statecraft which the Mighty Wurlitzer's
operators even brazenly gloat about:

'“We're
an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while
you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act
again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and
that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and
you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”'
(Ron Suskind, New York Times, Oct.
17, 2004)

“We
are made wise not by the recollections of our past, but by the
responsibility for our future.” --- George Bernard Shaw

In the Age of Deception

George
Orwell observed that: In the age of universal deceit to tell the
truth is a revolutionary act. I would humbly like to trump that
truism with an even greater one: In the age of universal deceit, to
learn the truth is a revolutionary act!

One
of the former directors of the CIA responsible for counter-insurgency
(counter-intelligence) operations in the United States, from
1954-1974, and under whose watch all the prominent assassinations of
the 1960s transpired, James Jesus Angleton, is reported to have
observed two additional universal truths: 1) When everything the
American people believe is false, we will know that our
disinformation (or propaganda) is complete; 2) Deception is a state
of mind and the mind of state.

It
would appear that the spymaster JJ Angleton far better understood the
public mind than the seminal novelist George Orwell.

The
revolution Orwell endeared his generations of readers toward is next
to impossible when reality is brought to the public mind wrapped in
layers of deception, like an onion. The exposé
of Israel
Shamir is the rare oddity that these
layers of deceit got automatically peeled away by a single
photograph. It does not normally happen --- which is why dissent-con
artists are able to thrive in the West so prolifically.

What
is truth and what is falsehood?

Who
is the con man and who is the prophet?

Almost
impossible to disambiguate in today's modernity -- and that is part
of the success of the hard road to world order ----- from Palestine
to World Government.

While
the Western and Eastern fools, the useful idiots, and assorted Trojan
horses planted from academia to academia, from NGOs to NGOs, from
media to media, and from politics to politics, both Republican and
Democrat, both Left and Right, and all degrees in between, as the key
assets of the oligarchy continue to rehearse the crimes of state, the
oligarchy that controls the state and its statesmen continues its
march to global governance making it all look like happenstance of
state sponsored hegemony.

No
--- it is not the Hans
Morganthu's state
which is the first actor in the crimes against humanity. It is the
behind the scenes conspirators, in an open
conspiracy,
who are the primordial first actors, and from whose primacy acts all
the evil follows which is cleverly, and legally, blamed upon the
state.

It
is they who weave the onion of deception, making it so systemic, and
endemic, that it becomes like the air we breathe, unnoticed. But it
necessarily cradles all our thoughts and acts in the presuppositions
bequeathed to our learning about the world. And most important, it
also cradles our conscience, our resistance, and our willing
compliance.

We
simply are unable to escape those presuppositions when even our most
learned teachers, our most notable consciences, our best moral minds,
are in on the act as the Hegelian Dialectic of Deception. Because,
without it, that state of mind that is the singular target of
perception management from generation to generation, from school to
school, and from nation to nation by the ruling state that dictates
all narratives of history, the education curriculum, and the
parameters of acceptable discourse, cannot transpire.

These
are the controllers outside the cave that Plato spoke of in his
allegory of the cave in The Republic 2500 years ago.

The
case of Israel
Shamir
is a most unusual case of all layers of the onion, all dramas enacted
on Plato's cave before the prisoners of the cave, coming apart with a
single photograph. The serendipitous unraveling of this case betrays
the causal connections on the Hard Road to World Order between its
assets and the oligarchy. These connections, always nebulous, always
removed from the first cause with many degrees of separation, became
visible in this one case --- because of the stupidity of Israel
Shamir. He helps us understand the modern snake oil Superman as
distinct from the nearly extinct Songbird.

A
déjà vu to keep reminding ourselves that no one,
absolutely no one, in modernity may be as they claim to be.
Perception management is the most essential instrument of statecraft
today. It trivially enables behavior control of the public mind, with
the public mind itself consenting to its own servitude.

No
psychology, sociology, and international relations professor in the
entire Western academe, news media, and officialdom to politicaldom
dare go there! Until it is all ex post facto – as was the case
for the million thesis volumes on the “banality of evil”
at the conclusion of the Third Reich!

For
your reading pleasure.

Thank
you,

Zahir
Ebrahim

Project
Humanbeingsfirst.org

What can make 'Sept. 11 pale by comparison'?

What
if the next big 9/11 is Aliens/UFOs landing? If that were to indeed
transpire, it is my bet that Muslims worldwide will be the first to
accept it --- they will race to join the imperial narrative of the
new intergalactic catastrophe in exactly the same manner as Pakistan
did for the first catastrophic terrorism imperial narrative of 9/11
'war on terror'. This is what I wrote in 2008:

'The
abominable shared fates that unite Iran (“Bush and Iran,
again”, WSJ April 15, 2008), and Pakistan, from President Bush
calling Pakistan “Terror Central” in 2007, to this week,
April 13, 2008, 'clairvoyantly' asserting that “If another
September 11 style attack is being planned, it probably is being
plotted in Pakistan, and not Afghanistan”. And as already noted
in its March 29, 2008 heads-up warning to America by Project
Humanbeingsfirst (“Nuclear attack on Iran appears imminent!”),
when such a “planned” attack transpires, it “will
make Sept. 11 pale by comparison” (Bush, Feb. 13, 2008).'

What
can make "Sept. 11 pale by comparison" according to the
former President of the United States? Well, I don't rightly know,
but according to the likely candidates usually prognosticated by the
super visionaries on both the Left and the Right, these range from
false-flag nuclear terror attack on American or its Allies' soil
blamed on any of the "Terror Centals" in the world,
including Pakistan and Iran; to new plagues and viruses requiring
Defcon-2 Alert and forced vaccinations; to some even suggest planets
colliding with each other – well of course, but of course, as
James Bond would repartee to M were he invited to plan it all out in
the next sequel on how to create world government for the City of
London.

None
of these scenarios still create the kind of credible threat that can
unite mankind permanently into a one-world government. Surely the CFR
and the Rockefeller Foundation that excel in scenario analysis must
be agonizing over it. As Ronald Reagan read off from his script at
the UN podium barely hinting at the thought processes going on behind
the scenes in the Iron Mountain underground vaults:

“If
suddenly there was a threat to this world from some other species
from another planet,” President Ronald Reagan had read out loud
from his script at the United Nations General Assembly podium in
1987, “in our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we
often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we
need some outside universal threat to make us recognize this common
bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide
would vanish, if we were facing an alien threat from outside this
world!” --- President Ronald Reagan, Speaking at the UN General
Assembly, September 21, 1987

I
fear that the Muslim public mind, led by its Mullahs, just as they
did last time led by the General, will announce their 'United We
Stand' against this new global intergalactic catastrophic threat of
terrorism by aliens before anyone even comes asking them to join the
coalition of the willing. Last time, or so the narratives say, it
only took a phone call. I don't really subscribe to that public
relations line because the General was implanted into the matrix long
before, to de-nuke Pakistan before the launch pad to the war in
Afghanistan could pragmatically be mobilized. I have no proof of this
but immanent game-theory scenario analysis indicates to me that
Pakistan does not have any Nuclear weapons, at least not as a viable
option at least before September 11, 2001.

Anyway,
not to digress, this time around, Pakistani Mullahs like
Tahir-ul-Qadri (among the Sunnis pushing “moderate Islam”),
and perhaps Jawad Naqvi (among the shias pushing “revolutionary
Islam”), and perhaps al Qaeda (among the fanatics pushing
“militant Islam”), and I am certain every country will
have their own such mullahs and their own such group mobilizations,
including Iraq-Iran's Ayatollahs in residence and Egypt-Saudi Muftis
on the pulpits, all pulling together behind the same hectoring
hegemons against the new global threat. Those lagging behind will be
the religious Christians, as theologically, they are the center of
creation, Jesus died for their sins, so how can aliens even exist?
Muslims will take the lead because theologically, God even proclaims
in the Holy Qur'an that He is “Lord of the Worlds” (Surah
Al-Waqia 56:80) and has sent His Criterion as “an admonition to
all creatures” (Surah al-Furqaan 25:1). Both those simple and
elegant verses, already memorized by 99 percent of the Muslims, will
be used to prove that alien landing is a divine miracle. The Muslims
will bow in sajdah all day long---it will be sight to behold with
some raconteur at the Rand Corporation actually peeing in his pant
from unstoppable laughter. The moment the aliens draw first blood
however, the Muslim Ayatollah and Mufti will join forces to lead the
battle against the evil-doers, eagerly uniting behind the hectoring
hegemons all of 2 billion Muslims worldwide in much the same way as
the General previously coerced merely the 200 million in Pakistan
behind them.

All
war-menacing stances and posturing the West has today against “Terror
Central” Iran, unless Iran has already been wiped out or used
up as a threat, will themselves be washed away without batting an eye
--- fabricated as this enemy is to begin with. It is a sad loss of
objectivity for the shia Muslim mind of Pakistan, just like any sad
loss of objectivity for any group-think, that it accepts the
propaganda line of Iran being their savior, while the rest of the
sunni Muslim mind worldwide accepts the propaganda line of the West
that Iran is the devil incarnate. The truth is elsewhere. But not to
digress once again.

Why
do I believe this new 9/11 could very well be aliens landing? It
could of course always be preceded by the mahdi and the messiah
together arriving as well, on NASA's Universal Holographic Satellite
Projection System (I made that up) but I needlessly digress again.
But were that to happen as well, it will be to play the Armageddon
card instead of the alien card. This is what I wrote in 2009 on that
front:

'Whereas,
the poor monetary reformer fighting the fabricated financial crisis,
already the underdog and resourceless in going against an entrenched
financial oligarchy with infinitely deep pockets, is also outwitted
by the sheer magnitude of the Hegelian design for Global Governance.
The momentum created by the disparate crises spanning the gamut of
global financial meltdown, global warming, global pandemic, global
war on terror, is insurmountable enough. Imagine if the next global
crisis after global food panic and global crop failure, is alien
sightings and landings!

It
will be the coup de grace for bringing the fractious humanity finally
together in one-world government “if suddenly there was a
threat to this world from some other species from another planet.”
As President Ronald Reagan had read out loud from his script at the
United Nations podium in 1987: “we often forget how much unites
all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside universal
threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think
how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing
an alien threat from outside this world”:

Coming
soon to your local friendly skies, complete with the 'messiah' and
the 'mahdi' descending from the heavens on the wings of dove, or the
chariots of fire, in their final return to save the now united
mankind against the common threats. Maybe there is something to this
'dajjal' story, the 'false messiah' lore after all! Brought to you
courtesy of NASA's Universal Holographic Satellite Projection
System.'

But
I dare to think that the alien card appears more likely --- as the
mahdi-messiah card could induce “uncontrolled predictability”
into the already stochastic equations of game theory. “Controlled
chaos” is what is needed for cementing world government. But if
part of the scenario is to get Muslims and Israel to wage the epic
battle of population reduction, that Armageddon can surely reduce the
earth's population by half in no time.

Well,
while I do not have a crystal ball any more clairvoyant than anyone
else (except that people like Zbigniew Brzezinski and the CFR surpass
all others in uncannily presaging the vilest form of dystopia with an
accuracy that puts Nostradamus to shame),
some real-time data-mining on the crescendo of propaganda on Aliens
and UFOs is the hint for the new galactic catastrophe being staged to
surpass 9/11. It is far more controllable as a chaos than the arrival
of the mahdi and the messiah which will unleash pure uncontrolled
fanaticism worldwide. Not sure how anyone could ever control that,
even with the stochastic finesse of game
theory and infinite supercomputers housed near electric power plants
and flowing rivers.

Here
is two counterfeit pennies worth of game-theory scenario analysis for
alien landing extracted from the real everyday tunes and harmonics of
the Mighty
Wurlitzer.

'After 16 books
and 25 years in basic research I thought I'd heard it all ... the
world was a confused mess, probably beyond understanding and
certainly beyond salvation - and there was little 'l could do about
it.

Back in 1968 my Western Technology and Soviet Economic
Development was published by the Hoover Institution at Stanford
University. In three substantial volumes I detailed how the West had
built the Soviet Union. However, the work generated a seemingly
insoluble puzzle - why have we done this? Why did we build the Soviet
Union, while we also transferred technology to Hitler's Germany? Why
does Washington want to conceal these facts? Why have we boosted
Soviet military power? And simultaneously boosted our own? In
subsequent books, the Wall Street series, I added more questions -
but no answers. I had more or less arrived at the conclusion that
there was no rational answer that could be proven.

Then a
year or so ago I received an eight-inch batch of documents - nothing
less than the membership lists of an American secret society.
Glancing through the sheets it was more than obvious - this was no
ordinary group. The names spelled Power, with a capital P. As I
probed each individual a pattern emerged ... and a formerly fuzzy
world became crystal clear.

... These volumes will explain
why the West built the Soviets and Hitler; why we go to war, to lose;
why Wall Street loves Marxists and Nazis; why the kids can't read;
why the Churches have become propaganda founts; why historical facts
are suppressed, why politicians lie and a hundred other whys.' ---
Preface Antony C. Sutton

Here
is a sample, pgs. 37-38:

'How
can there exist a common objective when members are apparently acting
in opposition to one another?

Probably
the most difficult task in this work will be to get across to the
reader what is really an elementary observation: that the objective
of The Order is neither "left" nor "right."
"Left" and "right" are artificial devices to
bring about change, and the extremes of political left and political
right are vital elements in a process of controlled change.

The
answer to this seeming political puzzle lies in Hegelian logic.
Remember that both Marx and Hitler, the extremes of "left"
and "right" presented as textbook enemies, evolved out of
the same philosophical system: Hegelianism. That brings screams of
intellectual anguish from Marxists and Nazis, but is well known to
any student of political systems.

The
dialectical process did not originate with Marx as Marxists claim,
but with Fichte and Hegel in late 18th and early 19th century
Germany. In the dialectical process a clash of opposites brings about
a synthesis. For example, a clash of political left and political
right brings about another political system, a synthesis of the two,
neither left nor right. This conflict of opposites is essential to
bring about change. Today this process can be identified in the
literature of the Trilateral Commission where "change" is
promoted and "conflict management" is termed the means to
bring about this change.

In
the Hegelian system conflict is essential. Furthermore, for Hegel and
systems based on Hegel, the State is absolute. The State requires
complete obedience from the individual citizen. An individual does
not exist for himself in these so-called organic systems but only to
perform a role in the operation of the State. He finds freedom only
in obedience to the State. There was no freedom in Hitler's Germany,
there is no freedom for the individual under Marxism, neither will
there be in the New World Order. And if it sounds like George
Orwell's 1984 - it is.

In brief, the
State is supreme and conflict is used to bring about the ideal
society. Individuals find freedom in obedience to the rulers.'

“Some
even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal
working against the best interests of the United States,
characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of
conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated
global political and economic structure – one world, if you
will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
--- Memoirs, 2002, pg. 405, ch. Proud Internationalist; Chairman The
Council on Foreign Relations; Chairman Emeritus Chase bank,
link1
for full context
, link2
for full context
, link3
for full context
, link4
for full context

“Ironically
however, the very innovations that are making possible dramatic
improvements in human well-being are also creating new problems which
raise the spectre of an alarming and possibly catastrophic disaster
to the biosphere we live in. And herein lies the dilemma that we all
face. Let me illustrate. Improved public health, has caused the
world’s infant mortality rate to decline by 60 percent over the
last 40 years. In the same period, the world’s average life
expectancy has increased from 46 years in 1950s to 63 years today.
This is a development which as individuals we can only applaud.
However the result of these positive measures is that the world
population that has risen during the same short period of time
geometrically to almost 6 billion people, and can exceed easily 8
billion by the year 2020. The negative impact of population growth on
all of our planetary eco-systems is becoming appallingly evident. The
rapid growing exploitation of the world’s supply of energy and
water is a matter of deep concern. And the toxic by products of
widespread industrialization and increased atmospheric pollution to
dangerous levels. Unless nations will agree to work together to
tackle these cross-border challenges posed by population growth over
consumption of resources and environmental degradation, prospects for
a decent life on our planet will be threatened. The recent UN meeting
in Cairo is appropriately focussed on one of these key issues,
population growth. But the controversies which have erupted at the
conference illustrate the problem of coming to grips with issues that
are deeply divisive and which have a profound moral dimension. The
United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the
world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing the world population and
stimulating economic development in a manner that is sensitive to
religious and moral considerations. Economic growth is of course an
inevitable corollary of a growing population, and is essential to
improved standards of living. But without careful coordination,
unrestrained economic growth poses further threats to our
environment. This was a major subject of discussion at the conference
in Rio de Janeiro on the environment two years ago. The focus then
was on sustainable growth, and global development. [Agenda 21] It was
pointed out at the conference that growth is most efficiently managed
by the private sector, but regulation of the process by national
governments and international bodies is also needed. And once again,
United Nations can certainly be among the catalysts and coordinators
of this process.”
--- David Rockefeller, Annual UN Ambassadors’ Dinner Sep 14,
1994,link
for full context

Which
Family in Europe is the prime-mover behind all this?

“We
(the House of Rothschild) provide advice on both sides of the balance
sheet, and we do it globally. ... We have had 250 years or so of
family involvement in the finance business, ... There is no debate
that Rothschild is a Jewish family, ... For a family business to
survive, every generation needs a leader, ... Then somebody has to
keep the peace. Building a global firm before globalisation meant a
mindset of sharing risk and responsibility. If you look at the DNA of
our family, that is perhaps an element that runs through our
history.” --- Baron David
de Rothschild, The first barons of banking by Rupert Wright, UAE
thenational.ae, November 6, 2008, link
for full context: The Invisible House of Rothschild By Zahir Ebrahim

Is
there any respectable name that you can cite who agrees with your
take on matters?

“We
are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this
mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local
nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with our
lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the
sovereignty of the local nation states of the world is still a heresy
for which a statesman or publicist can perhaps not quite be burned at
the stake but certainly be ostracized or discredited.”
--- Arnold Toynbee, The Trend of International Affairs Since the War,
International Affairs, November 1931, pg. 809, link
for full context: The Poor-Man's Guide to Modernity By Zahir Ebrahim,
7th Edition August 2013

But
that's only a dead historian you cite --- how about someone living,
who is also part of officialdom and shares these insane notions?

“In
the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states
will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty
wasn't such a great idea after all.”
--- Strobe Talbot, Former President Bill Clinton's Deputy Secretary
of State, 1992, link1
for full context

“We
are living through exceptionally difficult times. Financial crisis
and its dramatic impact on employment and budgets, the climate crisis
which threatens our very survival --- a period of anxiety,
uncertainty, and lack of confidence. Yet these problems can be
overcome, by a joint effort, in and between our countries. 2009
is also the first year of Global Governance with the establishment of
the G-20 in the middle of financial crisis. The climate
conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the Global
Management of our Planet. Our mission, our presidency is one of hope,
supported by acts, and by deeds.” --- Herman Van Rompuy,
EU Council President, press conference Nov 19, 2009, op.cit.

The Invisible Octopus

Regarding
Zionism and Israel, although I find it rather pervasive yet it is
clear as daylight that they have established a hegemony in the style
of the spread of internet, very much enmeshed in the fabric of power.
I don't believe this is something that just happens, rather, it
seems to me the culmination of decades of organized and conscious
effort. It is not natural to see powerful Western nations, in
particular US and UK, behave like they are subject to threat and
hence need to appease this sinister force even at the expense and
betrayal of their own population. Here in Canada, our PM shamelessly
supports whatever they do, virtually like a zombie. And it isn't just
the Conservatives, Liberals and NDP are in it, too. One of our NDP
MPs, Libby Davies, was strongly reprimanded by the late NDP head,
Jack Layton, and she had done nothing but express the obvious about
Israel. One wonders how we have come to this that a bunch of thugs
are can have so much power over our government.

It
is so easy to be disillusioned and demoralized when one looks at what
is happening in our Muslim nations, though I try to keep faith alive
in humanity and decency and justice, reminding myself that for
example, the darkest of the night is before dawn. And I also wonder
why Russia and China do not provide adequate challenge to these
insane financial and belligerent policies that constitute the
USrael/UK agenda. It is humanity that is being hijacked... I may have
mentioned it to you before but in Farsi we have a saying, "harcheh
b'gandad namakash mizannand; waay beh roozi keh b'gandad namak"
which translated says, "whatever is liable to rot is treated
with salt, alas the day when salt rots".

[A
Canadian of Iranian descent]

My
Response

"One
wonders how we have come to this that a bunch of thugs are can have
so much power over our government."

Indeed.
This is what the Rothschild scions have been quoted for 250 years:
"Give me control of a nations money supply and I care not who
makes its laws"!

With
that one single primordial control over nations in the form of
controlling their central banks, they created what you aptly
described: "they have established a hegemony in the style of
the spread of internet, very much enmeshed in the fabric of power."

This
is how they prevailed over Great Britain, the mother country of
Canada, to issue the Balfour Declaration – one of the most
treacherous documents in the history of colonialism. Click on the
Balfour Declaration image below to see its careful language
deconstruction by yours truly - Notice that the Balfour Declaration
is issued to the Rothschild name!

Caption
The Balfour Declaration November 2nd 1917

The
full examination of the Rothschild power structure is in my
Rothschild trilogy – called My Confusion Series Part-1
, Part-2
, Part-3
!

And
as you correctly noted of the interlockingness of their power, akin
to "the spread of internet", the following
explanation was given by W. Cleon Skoussen in his book 'The Naked
Capitalist' on how it was exercised by a handful of men:

‘The
real value of Tragedy and Hope … [is the] bold and boastful
admission by Dr. Quigley that there actually exists a relatively
small but powerful group which has succeeded in acquiring a
choke-hold on the affairs of practically the entire human race. Of
course we should be quick to recognize that no small group could
wield such gigantic power unless millions of people in all walks of
life were “in on the take” and were willing to knuckle
down to the iron-clad regimentation of the ruthless bosses behind the
scenes. As we shall see, the network has succeeded in building its
power structure by using tremendous quantities of money (together
with the vast influence it buys) to manipulate, intimidate, or
corrupt millions of men and women and their institutions on a
world-wide basis.’ (W. Cleon Skousen, The Naked Capitalist, pg.
6)

See
"Monetary
Reform: Who will bell the cat?"
for a fuller examination of why it is next to impossible to overturn
this all-pervasive corrupt-power once it has been legally granted to
the predators.

It
makes no difference, once this predatory power is granted and
unleashed upon the public, who sits in the White House or the
Congress. And the same is true of Canada, the EU, and the UK. I
examined this in 2008 on the eve of US presidential elections and
called for the boycott of the elections to give a low voter turnout
in order to demonstrate the illegitimacy of democratic institutions
once such power has been legally granted to the bankster fraternity.
It is in this essay: "Not-Voting
is a ‘YES’ vote to Reject a Corrupt System".

So
yes, all democratic systems of governance under their respective
constitutional republic fabrics have been entirely co-opted by such
private power. It is that power and its affiliation with Zionism
which makes all the western nations beholden to Zionism. If instead
of Zionism, the predators had chosen to ally themselves to some new
ideology, say "Babism" or Mayaism" -- just cooking up
some terms -- then it would have been those ideologies which would
now be holding their Damocles' sword upon the peoples of the earth.

In
their present alliance with Zionism, the end goal is World Government
by the financial oligarchy. All the global crises we see are merely
enabling vehicles for this new system of global management of the
planet, which to me appears will be ruled from Tel Aviv and
legislated from the New Jerusalem – the claimed hometowns of
the Rothschilds. It is obvious that this is already coming true --
for those who rule the White House, the sole unchallenged superpower,
also rule the world. Soon, very soon, they will supplant the White
House and rule the world directly as the new ruling state without
pretensions. Zion will be the new
"peace-maker" for the planet in her one-world government!
We can already witness the prelude to that global “peace-making”
in Palestine today in “From
Genesis to Genocide” and “Holocaust
in our Age”. We can also already see the
enabling of the new public relations mantra for the god's chosen
peoples in the FBI training graph below. Please click on the image to
see its deconstruction by yours truly (also see "Hijacking
the word 'Islam' for Mantra Creation"):

Caption
An FBI presentation titled “Militancy Considerations”
measures the relationship between piety and violence among the texts
of the three Abrahamic faiths

The
realization of the immenseness of this interlocking power-structure
remains invisible in the struggle for Palestine among the
Palestinians and their supporters. That is the real tragedy –
that mankind has collectively failed to recognize the nature of this
all-pervasive power which has besieged the world for over a hundred
years by riding on the backs of world wars, empires, and presently
the sole superpower.

Who
or What can unlock their octopi grip
on the affairs of the world when people don't even [want to] see the octopus?

And
the most fruitful realization of Captain Rhett Butler's swashbuckling
truism is yet to come, the profiting “from the upbuilding”
of civilization: the new Gold Standard which
will be pitched with Congressman Ron Paul's help as the panacea
demanded by the peoples. Since all the world's gold bullion supply,
and the world's gold mines, are already under monopoly control of the
same arsonists, no problem.

In
the New Economic World Order, with global central banks –
themselves controlled from behind the scenes by the same handful of
private family banks owned by the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers –
managing the world's merged global monetary system as well as all the
world's political governments in a global governance architecture, it
won't be a problem returning to the Gold Standard. All the fine gold
will have to be purchased from the same private international
banksters in order to back the trillions in new common currency
issued for transacting the entire world's commerce. How convenient
once again!

The
new monetary system will be happily made inflation averse amidst
cheers from the foolish goyem of the world. The new gold based
standard after all, does have to protect the enormous wealth of the
private banksters from inflationary-erosion in a largely serf-world
of the New World Order, wherein, the only real asset owners are the
banks. The new financial empire also has to be stable enough to last
a millennium! Can't have inflation eroding away all its loot as it
did moms and pops meager assets and life savings in the twentieth
century. Why indeed the Gold Standard
will now make perfect sense for the banksters and the handful of real
wealth owners of the world, was so passionately explained over a
hundred years ago by William
Jennings Bryan,
that it is best refreshed in the goy's mind directly from the horse's
mouth. The contorted dialectical
brilliance of the devilish banksters is truly unsurpassed!

Caution
– Winding Road Ahead: One also has to be cautious of
Congressman Ron Paul's End the Fed H.R. 833 and all variations
thereof, that it does not end up creating a cosmetic veneer in its
implementation as did the superficial nationalization of the Bank of
England, whereby, its effective control was retained in the same
private bankster hands. The hidden agenda in any public
nationalization of the FED would be to bring it on par with the
European Union Central Bank so that the private banksters can
continue on with their calculated moves for consolidating the new
uniform global monetary system. A nationalized
FED would be the precursor to the North American Union Bank.

These
international banksters are masters of legal shenaniganism as is
evident from their crafting of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913,
pitching the same plan through both the Republican Party and the
Democratic Party as fake oppositions to each other, and the latter
version rammed through Congress on Christmas eve. This
time around, the tactics may entail the carefully crafted 'Messiah'
figure and the handful of cultivated 'Rebel' figures both backing it,
and each pitching it to their respective constituency. This way, they
will claim transparency to make up for the previous time around.
It is essential that the people understand the depth of the
banksters' 300 years of devilish experience in orchestrating cleverly
disguised private central banks. Please watch the Money Masters video
documentary with your family, and read the short News Epilogue and
Introduction in the Monetary Reform Bibliography, so that no 'dumb
goy' is ever fooled into enslaving their own nation once again.

There
is no change in assessment since 2008. Any money system can be made
to work non-predatorily. The issue is not which system is better, no
not at all, although that has been made the primary issue by both
monetary reform advocates and by the banksters themselves. That
construct is a red herring. The real issue is how to make the system
non-predatory in the presence of the controlling oligarchy and its
primacy imperative. That, and only that, is the principal issue. Once
the power to issue money has been granted to the bankster
fraternity, regardless of the system itself, all is lost. As
the Rothschild scion have stated time and again, something to the
effect: grant us the power to issue a nation's money and we care not
who makes its laws.

True
to that boast, it has empirically made no difference, once this
predatory power was “legally” granted to the banksters
and unleashed upon the public, who sits in the White House or the
Congress. And the same is true of Canada, the EU, the UK. The debt
straddled Global South, being strangulated under 56 trillion dollars
in debt to the banksters' lending agencies as developmental loans in
a perpetual lender's trap, is in no position to standup to the World
Bank and the IMF to strike out independently on their national money
when the de facto international currency of the lending agencies
itself, and the de facto international trade currency, one and the
same, is under the banksters' control. Compounding
all that with the fact that the world is now perched on the cusp of a
World Order that bespeaks of global governance, global police-states,
and global Orwellian mind control, monetary reform effectively means
the changes the banksters wish to institute themselves in the guise
of monetary reform to protect their own “legally”
acquired hard assets – the earth, all that exists within, and
all that toils therein!

Because
of this near fait accompli of power, already consolidated
in the hands of the international banksters, firstly, this power
cannot be taken back as easily as it was given away in every nation.
The world already witnessed the immenseness of this power during the
2008 bankster bailout bill despite virtually the entire United States
peoples being against it. And secondly, it makes all monetary reform
proposals that are not suspect of being banksters' own ploy, or
introduced principally to sow confusion, and all genuine endeavors
for monetary reform, DOA – Dead on
Arrival. Virtually all prominent monetary reform advocates, it would
appear, are either controlled opposition instituted by the banksters
themselves to effectively thwart any impetus for genuine reform that
might be inimical to their own narrow self-interests, or are all but
hopeless romantics and idealists who are best characterized by the
proverb: if wishes were horses, beggars would ride. None of
them appear to be students of political science even if some appear
to be most sincere in their protestations of banking power. And they
mostly tend to speak in platitudes and clichés
when asked how they plan to introduce their great reforms which they
claim will go against the banksters' interests.

However,
to the credit of a handful of immensely courageous rebels in this
space, the accurate unraveling of the mystery and obfuscation
surrounding the issuance and control of money, and the history of how
it came to be “legally” consolidated in the hands of the
bankster fraternity, of course helps the public mind to understand
both the nature of money, and the power of the Money Trust
which controls it! It is because of their efforts that this scribe
acquired a great deal of understanding of the core issues. The first
name to mention is Eustace Mullins. It is this scribe's conclusion
that it was indeed Mullins' seminal book, Secrets of the Federal
Reserve, which must have forced the banksters to commission or permit
Carroll Quigley's Tragedy and Hope. The
latter specifically downplayed the role of the House of Rothschild in
the post World War II current affairs. Mullins had not spared that
name and Quigley, it would appear, was brought
in by the oligarchy for damage control through Limited hangout in the
form of a meticulously compiled secret
history of the control of world affairs from behind the scenes. G.
Edward Griffin made some excellent documentaries that brought
Mullins' and Quigley's revelations to the
mass public mind. The documentaries by Bill Still and Paul Grignon
continue that tradition of public education.

Understanding
the enemy perceptively, in all its manifestations, and stripped off
of its layers of deception, is always the first step in even
beginning to wage an effective battle against its web of control. But
that understanding alone is not sufficient. One also has to
understand one's own strengths and
weaknesses, and what power one can bring to bear to confront the
enemy. Sun Tzu expressed that wisdom most succinctly
in the Art of War some 2500 years ago:

'If
you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of
a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every
victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the
enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.'

Americans are slowly waking up!!

This same fellow was mainstream just a little while back --- he even voted for Mr. Obama in 2008 --- just watch him now!

Good for your Mark Novitsky.

While the born-again young rebel,
whistle-blower and interlocutor extraordinaire,
Mark Novitsky fondly remembers the late Senator Paul Wellstone's
contributions to his beloved nation, I hope I may be forgiven to
wonder out loud:

Dear Senator Paul Wellstone
--- I hope you can hear me up there. I just wonder if you had voted
for the Patriot Act-I in September 2001 that turned your nation into
a Police state; voted for the invasion of Afghanistan in September
2001 that brought blood upon the hands of your nation which no
perfumes of Arabia shall ever wash off; and had bought into the 9/11
fiction of Al Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden terrorists violating
America's chaste virginity on that very first day that that rape of
America happened when of all the peoples in America, it was your job
to be wide-awake, and to wake intelligent people like Mark Novitsky
up so that the pretext for "imperial mobilization" and the
"transformation" into New World Order could have been
nipped in the bud? I just wonder....

Every nation needs its heroes.
I guess your are it Mr. Wellstone for this born-again generation. May
God rest your soul in peace... and may the angels miss their count of
how many died in Afghanistan due to that first evil congressional
vote that sanctioned the invasion of Afghanistan, and from which all
the other evils have followed in the world. That first vote----May
the Angels overlook it. Everyone was in shock in America, they shall
surely understand. In any case, it was only the untermensch, the
unworthy victims 20,000 miles away who were gonna be paying the price
of that congressional vote with Daisy Cutters, not the worthy
American children .... I just gotta wonder about these things –
for evidently no one in America ever does. The good Americans wake-up
when their own bacon is being fried, and sing the songs of their own
heroes. Never the count of how many dead
untermenschen... the price of their vote. Oops I forget, the
Pentagon also does not keep count of them, so why would anyone
else...

As you surely already know by now, At Nuremberg, that first invasion
of Poland by the Third Reich using their own 9/11 'Operations Canned
Goods' "to goosestep the Herrenvolk across international
frontiers", was deemed to be a crime of aggression so
first-cause that it was even termed by the US Chief Prosecuting
Counsel the “supreme international crime differing only from
other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated
evil of the whole”. All those who voted, participated, and
aided and abetted in that first-cause were called 'war criminals' –
despite their pleas that it was waging a
war against the terrorist Poland. Some of them were hanged. But of
course no such victor's justice exists for a pious unsurpassed
superpower that has turned into the Fourth Reich with such short term memories.... Now they become heroes because they refused to kill any further, and stopped earlier than others. May the angels overlook that first count --- it was only the trial run before the conscience wakes up. That wakeup is intended to wash the slate clean. Perhaps Mr. Wellstone you can verify that for your Judeo-Christian followers.

The
following look at Sibel Edmonds illustrates how dissent contributes,
unwittingly, or wittingly, to the “doctrinal motivation”
of empire that ab initio launched, and now sustains, its “imperial
mobilization”. These quoted phrases are not mine but Dr.
Zbigniew Brzezinski's from his American Mein Kampf, The Grand
Chessboard - American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives ----
And most criminally, virtually all the “rebels” of the
world who maintain that 9/11 was done by “militant Islam”,
an invasion from abroad, are part and parcel of this same diabolical
exercise to corral the public mind for imperial mobilization because,
as Brzezinski summed it up: “Democracy is inimical to
imperial mobilization”.Nothing
that might interfere with that exercise of imperial power can be
permitted, and that includes dissent which is so laudably encouraged
in the so called “free societies” of advanced Western
democracies.

The
neutralization of dissent by the control of the narrative to ensure
that consent is effectively and continually engineered among “the
crowd of simpletons and the credulous ... when the voting papers of
the masses are the deciding factor”, as Hitler had so
colorfully put it in his Mein Kampf, is evidently not taught in
America's dissent landscape. It has been made a taboo topic, just
like many other taboo topics in Western freedoms. Try challenging the
official Holocaust narrative and immediately finding oneself without
a job, for instance. In Europe and Canada, one actually goes to jail
for it. Often, self-policing succeeds as much for unwittingly
co-opting dissent as it does for manufacturing consent. However, more
pernicious are the actual assets, the brilliant superman (in
Nietzsche's parlance) diabolically planted in society, as
journalists, academics, whistleblowers, et, al., who wittingly and
willingly deceive the public with the exact same big lie in their
dissent against empire as the mainstream scholars and intellectuals
do pitching for empire. This Mighty
Wurlitzer's machinery
subsequently acquires a natural life of its own, catching in its
deceptive wake many an unwitting accomplice who come to believe the
big lies and echo it in their own celebrated dissent. Not sure
how the two can be easily disambiguated – those who lie
unwittingly because they believe the big lies themselves, i.e.,
self-deception, and those who are just ideological mercenaries, i.e.
superman. Both are often highly intelligent, and to my mind, remain
indistinguishable, unless they can be shown to be outright morons and
mental midgets who, despite their high-falutin credentials, are
ignorant of the vile and sordid history of false
flag operations and self-inflicted terror as pretexts.
Such blame can, however, hardly be laid at the doorstep of the
brilliant high achievers who typically populate the avant-garde
dissent-landscape and are celebrated as the grand conscience of the
nation.

At
Nuremberg, I often wonder, had engineered-dissent been part of the
state sanction of the Third Reich to corral the type-2 and type-3
people whom Hitler had chosen to ignore as part of his engineering
consent among the mainstream, the type-1 as he classified the
categories of the public mind in Mein Kampf, would manufactured
dissent con artists have escaped condemnation as having directly
contributed to aiding and abetting the core lies, first lies
responsible for enabling and sustaining all the war crimes of World
War IV (II then) that followed?

Indeed,
if Nuremberg set the precedent for making aggression culpable, in the
immortal words of Robert Jackson, the chief prosecuting counsel for
the United States, as the supreme international crime: “...
the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes
in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole”
from which "all the evil that follows"is on
the aggressor's sole neck, then, the core lies which enable
aggression belong to the same logic. That was even proved by the
military War Crimes Tribunal rejecting Nazi Operation Canned Goods,
the pretext for launching the invasion of Poland, as nothing but a
self-inflicted wound, a big lie, to “goosestep the
Herrenvolk across international frontiers”, as Robert
Jackson successfully demonstrated to the Military Tribunal. Jackson
went even further. To deny charges of victor's justice, he piously
argued: “... we are not prepared to lay down a rule of
criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have
invoked against us.”

The
subsequent fate of Nazi philosopher Dr. Alfred Rosenberg, and Nazi
Reichminister for Propaganda Dr. Joseph Goebbells, is known to us
all. If propaganda to control the public mind was not merely passed
off as "freedom of speech", and Goebbels didn't escape the
fate of vulgar propagandists, he only cheated the hang-man's noose
with cyanide (see images here),
then even propagandists who connivingly manufacture dissent, and aid
and abet in promulgating the core-lies of empire in the name of
freedom of speech, have a legal precedent before them --- only
waiting to be argued by the likes of a future Robert Jackson at a
future Nuremberg, victor's justice notwithstanding.

Just
a thought.

Perhaps
the brilliant dissent scholars of America may offer their wise
opinion on the legality of hanging all vulgar propagandists today,
and how they might go about framing who is a propagandist and who is
merely using "freedom of speech" and "freedom of
academe", keeping the precedents set at Nuremberg in mind.
Specifically, I appeal to Dr. Francis Boyle who has at least multiple
degrees in framing International Law, and Dr. Noam Chomsky, my own
former professor who taught me all about Nuremberg, victor's justice,
and hypocrisy.

But
when the victors make the law, then like the proverbial king, the
law-givers decide who is the pirate and who's the emperor.

Legalism
or not, morally we already know where all narrators of the big lie
stand.

Undoing the Theft of Palestine

'If
you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of
a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every
victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the
enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.'

After
over three decades of interaction with Zionists beginning immediately
upon my arrival at MIT as an undergraduate and latching on to the
"vigorous" dissent of Noam Chomsky, and after as many years
of friendship with Palestinians beginning at Engineering University
in Lahore Pakistan as a teenager looking for my own intellectual
footings for the first time in my life and naturally siding with the
"mazloomeen" (the oppressed) as is often the norm when
passing through those gates of idyllic years, finding the key to
unlock the mysteries of the universe has been an elusive pursuit. As
Elie Wiesel had put it in one of his memoirs: “it is a
mystery whose parallel may only be the one of Sinai when something
was revealed to mankind.” Especially so in the modernity du
jour, in the age of Superman. At least for most of us ordinary
people; those who aren't the Nietzschean Superman that is.

Until
one reads Sun Tzu, Plato, Machiavelli, Nietzsche, Hegel, and of
course the Balfour Declaration. Then, speaking for myself, most of it
becomes crystal clear – as if one finally found the key to the
door past which no one can otherwise see.

Unfortunately,
none of the above methods of statecraft and its attendant
methods of narrative control is either studied by, or taught to, the
Palestinians. And that appears to me to be the primary reason for
Palestinians continuing to lament their Nakba song year in and year
out – and they will likely continue to do so until the “Zion
that will light up all the world” is achieved.

It
is more than just lamentable and tragic, outright
criminal in fact, that most Palestinians, activist and silent
bystanders alike, in this day and age of iphones and ipads, do not
even know to whom the Balfour Declaration is addressed. The primary
document that instrumented their subjugation and almost a century
long oppression, the Palestinians most Kafkaesquely remain unaware of
despite being most tech-savvy in tweeting
text messages and pouring their heart out in volumes on facebook.
While many have surely heard of the Balfour Declaration by name,
almost none of the outspoken lot in the Palestinian Diaspora has
evidently actually read it – if one is permitted to conclude
their ignorance by their omissions that is. The ubiquitous deafening
silence alone makes the self-policing self-evident.

Who,
or what forces have deprived the latter day Palestinians of this
knowledge of their own history? What lies behind this self-policing
narrative control among the Palestinians themselves?

Try
this simple test yourself in your rebel meetings, freedom
conferences, and classrooms. Ask your Palestinian students,
professors, and other colleagues and friends who support the
Palestinian cause: To whom is the Balfour Declaration addressed? At
best they might come back to you surprised: “it is addressed to
someone?”

How
can the young activist wage an effective struggle against the
long-running, systematic, and piece-meal usurpation of his homeland
when diligent intellectualism has been replaced by plentiful talk by
the ignorant activist to the equally ignorant Western audiences; by
weekend street protest more in catharsis than in effectiveness before
returning happily to the pursuit of the 'American Dream' the
remaining days of the week; and by ineffective emotional sloganeering
and book publishing rather than effective intellectual combat against
a most diabolical adversary? Especially for the Palestinians holding
on to their keys in their forced Diaspora where no one is shooting
them and their brothers and sisters in the eyes?

The
safety enjoyed by the Palestinian activist in the West is all but
lost to his and her unwitting ignorance of, or witting self-policing
silence on, the most diabolical methods employed, and still continue
to be employed, in the theft and ongoing military occupation of
Palestine.

Whatever
the Palestinian activist can say today has been said many times even
by the oppressors themselves. What they don't say is what no one else
is saying either. Thus I have found this bizarre empiricism
that they do not know the name of their prime-mover oppressor.

The
enemy has been most carefully cloaked from the public mind by some
sort of “iron wall”. Part One of Sun Tzu's test to
prevail upon the enemy is failed right off the bat by the
Palestinians.

From
time immemorial, from when Kaabil killed Haabil (Cain killed Abel),
to the present, from Afghanistan to Palestine, Iraq to Pakistan, and
from TSA at American airports to police state USA being inflicted
upon the bewildered American mind in the name of protecting them from
Islamofascist terror, the only morality seen in practice is the
control of the public mind; by hook or by crook.

While
it is a truism that might makes right, but as Aldous Huxley pointed
out, you can do everything with a bayonet except sit on it. In order
to control the public mind indefinitely, you must have some measure
of their consent. Machiavelli and Hegelian Dialectic easily enable
today's “history's actors” to get away with the
theft of commonsense and good judgment of the public mind; and in the
aftermath of that heist, easily convincing the mass mind of
absurdities and consequently getting them consenting to atrocities.

Or,
for the tiny rebellious minority made of sterner brain cells that are
not so easily bamboozled by idiotic mainstream narratives, getting
them to run endlessly on treadmills under alternate controlled
narratives that encourage and glorify dissent. These controlled
opposition of the discourse space is most
carefully laid out in front of them to steer their moral anger and
quest for truth and justice --- to anything and everything but that.

The
focus of the rebels is cunningly shifted away from the prime-movers,
away from the first cause, to effects. By engineering all the
discourses to get the causality wrong, the prime-movers are cleverly
kept occulted from the public mind. The effects are already visible
to all and sundry anyway. Let that remain focus of dissent. It will
get nowhere. And it evidently does not. That ineffectiveness is the
problem of the Palestinians' own making. It is their first
intellectual co-option, their mental servitude, that they so easily
follow the core narratives laid out before them in their resistance.

The
control and self-policing of the Palestinian narrative to principally
mask out the prime-movers behind their cataclysm while continuing
their illusion of vigorous struggle and debate, ensures the
Machiavellian failure of their struggle for justice ab initio, and
equally ensures the permanent fait accompli of the murderous
resettlement of Zionistan in Palestine.

See
if the forcibly displaced Mexican can return to California, or the
reservation consigned what's left of the Native American Indian can
return to his lands, today!

This
is what Vladimir Jabotinsky wrote in the "Iron Wall" in
1923:

“This
colonization can, therefore, continue and develop only under the
protection of a force independent of the local population – an
iron wall which the native population cannot break through.”

What
is that “iron wall”? Who or what is that force that is
independent of the local population?

You
will not hear that examined and analyzed by anyone in the United
States --- neither the loud Jewish professors who claim high moral
ground critiquing the Jewish State from America's mightiest
university podiums (like Noam Chomsky at MIT and Norm Finkelstein
previously of Princeton and DePaul University), nor the Palestinian
Professors proudly adorning the mantle of high scholarship in
empire's best universities (like Rashid Khalidi et. al. at Columbia
and Hatem Bazian at UC Berkeley). Most men and women of conscience in
Diaspora and on ground zero in Palestine, both Jewish and
Palestinian, somehow always seem to know to what extent they may
exercise their “vigorous” dissent before they might be
permanently “retired”. Pursuing BDS is that extent of
safe dissent.

I
have come to the sad realization that most prominent rebel leaders
are outright Trojan Horses, house niggers, and useful
idiots, cultivated to keep their Jewish Superman massa
good company playing the Hegelian Dialectic of Dissent. The
beleaguered Palestinian public mind holding on to its keys and its
memories is encouraged to follow these celebrated controlled
opposition as their political leaders, intellectual opinion-makers,
and activist pied pipers. All of these celebrated
icons and champions of Palestine share one key fact in common: their
silence on the prime-movers behind the theft of Palestine.

The
diabolical theft of Palestine is perhaps the best case-study of
waging war by way of deception. The success of that deception
is underscored by Sun Tzu quoted above. The Palestinians today
neither know themselves, nor do they know their enemy. And thus they
have lost every battle against the Zionists.

The
struggle for Palestine will continue to remain ineffective so long as
the real harbingers and their real agenda remains cloaked in
deception; so long as the Israel Project is kept “under the
protection of a force independent of the local population – an
iron wall which the native population cannot break through.”
That local population will soon come to encompass the entire earth,
in a “Zion that will light up all the world”, in
one-world government. The Palestinians are only the canary in the
coal mine!

The
Oligarchic Primacy in Palestine and the Oligarchic Primacy for World
Government is one and the same project.

That
straightforward recognition has been most carefully kept away from
the Palestinian public mind by virtually
all the political as well intellectual leaders and scholars of
Palestine.

Not
one among them ever mentions the name Rothschild --- the king of the
Jews and of the world --- in whose name the Balfour Declaration was
issued by the British Empire.

The
Invisible House of Rothschild has managed to construct
that “iron wall” around Palestine that remains
independent of the local population of Palestine even a hundred years
later. All the heads of Europe and the United States bow before it in
silence, even today.

And
evidently, so do the Palestinians.

Caption
Undoing Oligarchic Primacy in Palestine: “This colonization
can, therefore, continue and develop only under the protection of a
force independent of the local population – an iron wall which
the native population cannot break through.”

From Genesis to Genocide in Palestine – Déjà vu Gaza 2012

Project
Humanbeingsfirst observes the self-evident fact of the matter that
reading and crying and then repeat, which is what humanity continues
to do upon discovering another holocaust, does not help those who are
seeing the end of their genocide! Those escaping their holocaust
continue to endure it for a long long time. The images on television
brought to the rest of us in the comfort and safety of our home only
tell a futile story –– for it repeats again and again
with even more inhuman brazenity while most just watch on, perhaps
with a silent prayer.

Caption
'I am a Palestinian.Hath
not a Palestinian eyes? hath not a Palestinian hands, organs,
dimensions, senses, affections, passions? fed with the same food,
hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by
the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer, as a
Jew is?If you prick us, do we not bleed?if you tickle us, do
we not laugh?if you poison us, do we not die?and if you wrong
us, shall we not revenge?If we are like you in the rest, we will
resemble you in that.If a Palestinian wrong a Jew, what is his
humility? Revenge.If a Jew wrong a Palestinian, what should his
sufferance be by Jewish example?Why, revenge.The villainy you
teach me, I will execute, and it shall go hard but I will better the
instruction.' (Adapted from The Merchant of Venice)

A
battle for Zionistan primarily seeded in the Machiavellian
intellect of the ubermensch which begets the genocide of yet
another untermensch even as we speak, cannot be fought with
tears, protests, and narratives.

Project
Humanbeingsfirst uses the word “genocide” and “holocaust”
very circumspectly. To the dead it makes little difference whether
they are murdered in a concentration camp in the tiny Belsen or the
large one in Gaza. To the living, it becomes only a narrative: for
some to be borne with screams and nightmares, for others to become a
bountiful harvest of political and pecuniary gains. That spans the
full gamut of opportunism, from the Holocaust
IndustryTM to peddling the travails of a beleaguered
peoples in the garb of erudite scholarship and high-minded morality.
The worst of which is to plant clever red herrings among the victims
in an unprecedented intellectual and psychological warfare to ensure
that the golem will never be identified and put down by the victims
even in their existential struggle for survival. The
onslaught of this holocaust is full spectrum.

The
genocidal assault on the civilians of Gaza
in 2012 by the mighty state of Israel is once again only enabled
because no Palestinian evidently learnt in 2009, never mind in 1948
or 1917, that the power which unleashes this holocaust upon them, now
in its 64th continuous year, actually beats in the heart
of a golem that resides not in Zion, but elsewhere.

That
golem has surrounded its criminal enterprise with an “Iron
Wall” of such power and obscurity that few have been able to
breach it –– evidently none among the beleaguered
Palestinian peoples themselves if their silence on it is permitted to
speak of their missing wherewithal. To this
day, most Palestinians, never mind the rest of the peoples on planet
earth silently watching the spectacle of an innocent people being
systematically eradicated from their own land like “cockroaches”,
remain unaware that the principal land deed which gratuitously
granted their land to the Jews was addressed to Lord Rothschild. It
is their oligarchic enterprise. Yet none dare utter that name ––
not even among the Palestinians!
Because of that absurdity, it is once again Déjà vu in
Gaza, 2012, today!

The
Balfour Declaration: Dear Lord Rothschild, 'His Majesty's Government
view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home
for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavor to facilitate
the achievement of this object. it being clearly understood that
nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious
rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights
and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.'

The
holocaust in Palestine cannot be interdicted without first
effectively breaching that “Iron Wall” which protects the
criminal enterprise of Zionistan. Since few speak of it –
never mind comprehend it – the price is continually paid in the
pound of flesh extracted from the Palestinian peoples while
they are kept innocent of knowledge of their most cunning and
diabolical foe.

Pandering to the American audience -- and missing by a mile!

Masters over the World

'...
The point is that a Jew has strength, ability and power to create the
desire within G-d to accept and become King over the entire creation.

It's
understood, that the existence of the entire creation, in truth, is
brought about by the Jew's coronation of G-d, and through which He
becomes a King over the entire creation, which ultimately results in
the fact that all of creation comes from the Primary being, G-d.

It's
obvious that since every Jew, men and even women and children, brings
about the existence of the entire creation, they become masters over
the world, and thus every single creation owes them recognition for
this good.

Being
that through the Jew, all beings were created, he therefore becomes
the master over all of them.

This
is especially so in regards to what needs to be accomplished on erev
[every?] Rosh Hashana.

Since
the judgment of Rosh Hashana is primarily regarding physical matters,
as explained in Likutei Torah, therefore the Jew is in complete
control, particularly over physical matters.

The
physicality of the world itself has to recognize the good that the
Jew has accomplished.

Through
the Jews they came into being, and their true existence is through
their unity with the True Being.

Since
G-d and the Jews are one, each Jew becomes a True Being, and is thus
able to bring about all of creation.

He
therefore has control over all of creation and not only that, but
they owe him thanks and are indeed thankful, for being provided with
abundance in physical and especially spiritual matters.'

All
rational and independent thought, all moral sense, all commonsense,
must ultimately bow before that categorical imperative by definition.

No,
it takes only one moral Jew to confuse me.

One
single Jew who lives in Israel, is not born there, and proclaims
Palestinian rights!

I
would, I believe, be considerably less confused if all the pious Jews
not born in Palestine but still living there – just because
they are Jews and were given priority to immigrate there on that
basis alone over those Palestinians who were born there, whose
parents and grandparents were born there and forcibly evicted under
state sponsored terrorism, and prevented from returning to their own
ancestral continuously inhabited place of birth by the same state
sponsored terrorism – were to first vacate their own personal
occupation of another's home and rightfully return back to where they
came from, BEFORE they started clamoring for Palestinian rights. It
might be less confusing, and also more convincing, to those who dare
to think independently.

I
hope I may be forgiven this transgression of independent thought –
it is surely a minefield and has confused the hell out of me –
and I do believe the Rabbis have also forbidden the goy from thinking
independently from the Jews precisely for that reason. We tend to get
confused easily when we think on our own.

Isn't
there also a clause in the King's Torah that any goy found thinking
independently from the Jews should be immediately killed as he or she
represents a potential threat to the very existence of the Jewish
State? I do in fact recall statements from the King's Torah
reproduced in several articles by other Jews including Gilad
Atzmon's, that any goy who poses any threat to the legitimacy of the
Jewish State, or to the Jews, can legally be killed by the Jews,
preemptively.

Desire
for such preemption, the killing of the goy in cold blood, in
self-defense of course, was precisely expressed by Lawrence Kulak,
writing for ’5 Towns Jewish Times’ 5tjt.com, 11/12/2008
(cached here):

'“Muslims
believe in the literal interpretation of the Biblical doctrine of an
eye for an eye, and they do not have respect for anything perceived
as a lesser standard of justice. They killed our innocents, and
unless we kill theirs, they will go on killing ours. The Torah,
however, preaches a doctrine which, if implemented by the West, could
finally put an end to all Islamic terror: If somebody is coming to
kill you, rise up and kill him first.”'

Such
humble attempt at independent thinking as demonstrated here, surely
poses a threat to the very existence of the Jewish state – for
what if hundreds of thousands of Jews of the 4.5 million living on
usurped lands, choosing not to be damn hypocrites anymore, suddenly
left the Jewish state and renounced their ill-gotten citizenship of
the racist oppressive state?

What
if that number swelled to a million? Two million? They all, or most
of them anyway, retain their original nationalities and passports,
and there is no practical difficulties for them returning back once
they recognize the very immorality of their being there due to their
race alone when those who were born there cannot return!

Lighting
such a fire in the mind of moral Jewish men and moral Jewish women of
Israel, their Metanoia, surely qualifies as
a dire threat to the very existence of the pariah Jewish State?

And
thus easily become their target of assassination – who can hide
from the almighty Mossadhitman
anywhere in the world if Victor Ostrovsky is to be believed?

Could
such precariousness of independent thought possibly be the reason why
Palestinians often like the Jews to think for them and thus never
encounter such funny absurdities in all their struggles from the
safety of their forced Diaspora?

Is
this also why courageous Palestinian leaders on ground zero who shy
not from taking a bullet to their brains from the Israeli soldier who
may or may not fire at them for their physical defiance, somehow
prefer to not be assassinated for sure by
Mossad for demonstrating their intellectual defiance?

For,
these brave Palestinians evidently prefer to be accompanied by a
beautiful Jewish voice, and principally permit her to plead for the
Palestinians, as this chap, Dr. Mustafa Barghouti, did on prime time
television. As I said, I get easily confused when trying
to think for myself. From coast to coast, and continent to continent,
excited Palestinians and their Jewish supporters cheered that finally
the Palestinians' plight was heard on
mainstream American television from a most beautiful and most
eloquent American Jew who had suddenly woken up to the grotesque
reality in the Holy lands and therefore had
no reason to be biased. In fact, the narrative of the Jewish voice
was almost mirrored by the Palestinian leader as well, sharing all
the same axioms with precision. I must evidently be a very lonely
fool to have tried this experiment of actually thinking for myself,
because I came away rather confused by all this amidst
the roaring applause of the supporters. That episode is narrated at
length in 'Rescuing
a Failed Struggle From Its Narratives'.

I
could go on and on about my strange experiments with independent
thinking. But I'll just end now. I will sheepishly admit though that
I certainly used to enjoy life much better when I permitted others to
think for me. My confusions then were much less about absurdities and
almost entirely about whom to believe. It didn't matter if they were
Jews, or Muslims, Christians, or atheists. Even a monkey was fine
provided it came wearing a robe with 'expert' tattooed
upon its forehead. I only had to choose from among the many competing
experts, often going with the ones who represented my a priori world
views the best. I never needed to forge my own thoughts
independently.

Now,
even a single moral Jew can send me off into deep convulsions of
Kafkaesque proportions, as does most every
other expert I encounter. Perhaps I am going about this free-thinking
business all wrong? Perhaps there is some happy halfway compromise to
fully independent thinking which will also help me gain friends and
influence people?

Perhaps
it is easiest to forget such inconvenient paradoxes, chalk them up to life's minor
inconsistencies, and just move on?

It's
evidently too costly to think anyway. It can cause one to lose valued
friends and allies, comfort zones and treadmills, heroes and
hero-worship.

But
I would like to ask Jews who evidently think for themselves, what
should I make of such funny conundrums? What do you make of them?

And
since many respectable Palestinian thinkers demonstrate such sympathy
and solidarity with Jewish dissent emanating from Tel Aviv to
Jerusalem, perhaps I can ask them too what do they do with such
paradoxes. Do they simply ignore them?

Or
do they take the easy way out like me and seriously consider stopping
the onerous burden of thinking for themselves? The Jews most
eloquently think for both sides of the divide anyway, thus certainly
sparing the Palestinians any trouble.

For
those who love to intellectualize their own terrorization while they
terrorize others with 'United We Stand', the Airport intrusive
patdowns cannot be understood in isolation from the two parallel
contexts of “imperial mobilization” and “police
state” which cradle that act. The pat-downs are merely
obedience training for the American public.

It
appears that in this particular instance, there was no choice for the
passengers – be exposed to radiation and full nudity via X-ray
body-scan, or, feel the pain of sexual groping and molestation....
LAX, Terminal six, United Airlines.

The
grotesquely absurd demand by the TSA agent seeking $500,000 from Amy
Alkon must be resoundingly defeated because I suspect it is not just
the pot calling the kettle black (ulta chore kotwal ko dante),
not just a TSA agent suing Amy for her loud complaining, but the TSA
itself is suing Amy, DHS is suing Amy, Police-state is suing Amy, as
part of silent acceptance of obedience training of Americans.

I
suspect that this is another testing of the waters by the hectoring
hegemons, a barometer, a rain gauge, of how successful their
obedience training has been thus far --- will the Americans even
accept this vile absurdity that after the state shoves its hand
inside the American vagina, it prohibits complaining about it and the
majority of people accept it?

The
intimidation of lawsuit is also intended to be precedent setting to
ensure that the majority of the public do not revolt because it will
hit them directly in the pocket-book.

Remember,
indoctrination and obedience training is primarily for the masses.
The public already has accepted all the rest of 'war on terror'
absurdities which have been heaped upon
them since 9/11:

Please
promulgate this issue widely. Publish it if you have a website.
Highlight Amy Alkon's case if you are a writer. Donate funds to her
legal defense team if you have the capacity. For all these acts, you
will actually be helping protect your own loved ones' vaginas and
balls. And most importantly, take Amy's own advice for the best way
you can support her, by standing up for your own self: "Thank
you so much -truly appreciate that. And my wonderful attorney has the
legal defense handled, but what I hope people will do is make a stand
for our rights. Many, many thanks.-A"

The 'empire' plays to win strategically and can't be derailed by a handful of reactionary truth tellers after the manufactured crises have been affected – for had truth-telling any efficacy, Socrates might have been handed a trophy instead of the Hemlock, and Jesus the kingdom instead of the cross. The key to the success of Hegelian Dialectics over time, is the diabolical Fait Accompli sewn in baby-steps. The impact of the invasion of Iraq upon its peoples cannot be reversed by withdrawing the American troops anymore than the impact of the Pandemic can be reversed by arguing whether the vaccine is good or bad. The Pandemic has already created its intended fait accompli – for, 90% of the masses are not only ready today to take the vaccine but also demanding it. The secretive agenda probably is to inoculate at least 50% of the targeted populations in this generation, priming them for at least two things: microchipping, and staging for long term population reduction/culling through some complex biowarfare protocol. They will surely achieve 70 to 80 percent success towards that goal in this round of the pandemic pandemonium. And this is a conservative estimate. That's pretty damn remarkable social engineering for one baby-step fait accompli. More baby-steps to come. The overarching agenda for world-government and its multi-dimensional goals is long-term, across multiple generations, and hinges on irreversibility of small baby-steps to eventually raise the complete Phoenix of the New Atlantis from the systematically burnt ashes in stages of the old order. Under the guise of this Pandemic look how much has already been achieved: the immense loss of national sovereignty to WHO. Under its level-6 Pandemic alert, WHO now controls the emergency response stratagems in all nations that are signatory to its convention. That's most of the world!

As validation of what is stated above, just look at the long lines demanding the vaccine after the declaration of emergency by the President of United States

“... Having said that, does it work to mandate [vaccination]? I think what would work better would be to say that there was a shortage and people tend to buy more of something that's in demand. (Laughter.) We saw that -- there was one season where, really, people lined up all night to get a flu shot.

... we thought we were going to need two doses for every adult and since we are – only one dose, so, actually, we have twice as many doses and enough for the whole population at this point, I understand.”

No one from the learned audience in the above video asked the distinguished panel of experts carefully assembled by the CFR (whose bios, it was explicitly stated, is on the web and “in your packets if you are here”), that how did they suddenly learn that now the public needed only a single doze of inoculation, when just a few months ago it was being heavily promoted as requiring multiple dozes?

No one asked them that where did they get the new scientifically valid data (as opposed to anecdotal one) to change their expert recommendations so rapidly within the span of just a couple of months, when the vaccines for this new pathogen are themselves very new and haven't been around long enough to carry out controlled double-blind studies of their efficacy over the long term to know how many dozes are needed – since the damn virus itself is new and never seen before on planet earth?

And if the older vaccines are imagined by their manufacturers to be very broad-spectrum, as the President of the United States presumed when he ordered several billion dollars worth without testing on the actual new virus, then why did the officials not know how many dozes will be needed just a few months ago? What new data was received in the span of just a few short months between the summer and fall?

And the most crucial aspect to this question, no one asked the distinguished panelists who spoke in all sorts of foreign accents, that if, by their own admission, this 2009 virus is “novel” and “lacks certain signatures which other pandemic influenza viruses have ... which suggest that this virus is not a 1918 like virus ... or 1957 or 1968 virus”, then they could not have possibly known of the older vaccines' efficacy on this new virus a priori any more than the newly patented vaccines, and therefore, when did they actually test the vaccines on the new virus and upon whom?

Because, practically speaking, how could they have tested the vaccines on the new virus (for any length of time) when they didn't even know, and surely now don't know, who actually has the virus and who doesn't since “the CDC abruptly advised states to stop testing for H1N1 flu, and stopped counting individual cases” way back in late July 2009?

So, where did the clinical testing data magically come from between the summer and fall, for the expert's statement: “we thought we were going to need two doses for every adult and since we are – only one dose,” –except out of thin air no differently than the missing WMDs in Iraq after the domain experts from that officialdom had similarly asserted that their “data” incontrovertibly indicated that these were there and about to be launched upon the United States unless the superpower invaded Iraq with the most absolute “shock and awe” immediately?

But the ubiquitous Dr. Nancy Snyderman of NBC says that “this is one time there is no conspiracy, listen to our government agencies, these guys are telling the truth. You know there is no conspiracy here folks. Get your damn vaccine.” Should we believe her and dreadingly also await the inevitable ex post facto “oops!” for this new nemesis of mankind?

Obviously not one science person in the audience, and those supposedly calling in their questions on Twitter, knew how to add 2 + 2 to become skeptical of the panelists' techno-babble gibberish anymore than any mainstream scientists have been of the official NIST report on the how the WTC towers catastrophically collapsed into their own footprints due to a short fire. No one among the questioners straightforwardly suggested to the expert CFR panelists that as per their own admission (quoted above), the simplest convincing explanation appeared to be their own one made in jest, that they were indeed artificially manufacturing demand for the swine flu vaccines for their own agendas!

But that's not the end of straightforwardness if one was actually permitted and inclined to ask questions freely as a science person is imagined to be wont. It could have gone straight down hill from there if even one person present had any courage to boldly ask the obvious followup questions and pushed the envelope of the CFR assembled experts' credibility right to the edge. One could, for instance, have put the following biowarfare related burning questions residing on many a skeptic's mind to the CFR panelists and given them an opportunity to counter all the nay-sayers rationally with reproducible scientific evidence rather than disparagingly as was actually done (see below):

a) what role did the secret bioweapons laboratories and their mad scientists play in fabricating this never before seen in nature hybrid virus, as by their own admission its signature is different from all other past pandemic viruses;

b) could they prove that the new virus occurred entirely naturally and that bioweapons labs played no black-ops role in its synthesis and dissemination when it is only they who possessed all the samples from the previous pandemic viruses and could indeed have more easily fabricated the new pathogen to their desired level of deadly pathogenicity than the poor pigs relying only on their natural pig-pens – just like 911 is more straightforwardly explained as an inside job, a coup d'etat, than as the surprise attack of a disgruntled Ali Baba upon the most armed to the teeth superpower from his underground caves in the Hindu Kush;

c) that, there definitely appeared to be so much incredulity in common in the officially designated nemesis in both cases, Osama Bin Laden and the pigs, that the public insists on seeing some verifiable proof this time around before submitting to the officialdom's remedies and could they kindly provide that proof since their own glowing bios, though undoubtedly stellar, were not sufficient evidence;

d) how could the big-Pharma have filed so many patents for the vaccines before the existence of the new virus itself was known, and remarkably, also just in time to profit from the sudden appearance of the virus as a pandemic, with WHO, CDC, and all governmental agencies coercively pushing these vaccines as the only solution upon the global public while giving blanket immunity from liability to the big-Pharma whose stock has gone soaring, and that why might not one conclude from all this that the pharmaceutical companies knew about the virus and its pandemic breakout schedule ahead of time and they are being given immunity from lawsuit because the vaccines are indeed dangerous and untested;

e) how could they make such accurate predictions of when the viral pandemic would burst on the world scene, even as a hypothetical case study, as for instance in the Air Force's April 1996 planning document “Alternate Futures for 2025” pg. 54 which stated: “in 2009, when an influenza pandemic struck”, and in IBM's 2006 interdepartmental memo whose very first bullet item stated: “There is a 100% chance that a Pandemic will occur within the next 5 years”;

f) that could they explain scientifically, how such predictions could be accurately made to come to pass by just the laws of chance on something as unpredictable as a mutating virus, without someone deliberately bringing it to fruition?

One could have further challenged the distinguished CFR panelists at this point by asking whether they were aware that the pandemic served CFR's own diabolical agenda of creating “an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece [to] accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault” as was blatantly stated by CFR's Richard Gardner in the April 1974 Foreign Affairs article Hard Road to World Order, and that they, as stellar scientists, but perhaps un-learned in the ways of Machiavellian social engineering, were being played as mere pawns for creating justifications towards that globalists' agenda?

Obviously, not one person in that carefully screened audience had ever read anything other their own science and medical text books. But strangely, no one from the internet Tweeted in those kinds of questions either (sic!). Indeed, one erudite questioner in physical attendance, someone who identified himself as being affiliated with Cornell Medical School (the man pictured in the CFR video image above), even preemptively described any skeptical questioning by the ever growing coalition of bipartisan nay-sayers in the world, as a sort of “Hitler-Stalin Pact”in this disparaging way:

“I think we are all aware that the anti-vaccine movement is having a field day on the internet and on media outlets like Fox News and so on, and causing reductions in vaccine uptake. And it appears a pretty unholy alliance of the ultra-right and the ultra-left working together as the sort of Hitler-Stalin pact (laughter), and I am not sure that we are countering these people very well ... and you have to take these people on in a different style than the scientists are used to. ... Crazy people who think the vaccine will kill you! ... How best we can to stop the anti-vaccine movement?”

It is surely not beyond the wit of those “crazy people” left standing after all that propaganda and giving the CFR's dog and pony show only some minor indigestion from their over-exuded hubris, to imagine that the following riot preparations, ostensibly for the masses demanding vaccine and not getting it – again an Edward Bernays Special Edition – is in reality for the “Hitler-Stalin pact” malcontents unwilling to play ball and actually refusing it:

But Judge for Yourself if unconvinced that there is more to this pandemic story, and consequently, more to the bizarre impetus behind the hook or by crook vaccinating the world's populations under its ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ than meets the eye. Or, if you'd rather skip to The Conclusion, or jump to the Preamble to better grasp the overarching dynamics behind the swine flu first, do it now.

“This is one time there is no conspiracy, listen to our government agencies, these guys are telling the truth. You know there is no conspiracy here folks. Get your damn vaccine” — Dr. Nancy Snyderman, NBC’s Chief Medical Editor, August 2009

H1N1 Conclusion: Whether or not there is a real Swine Flu pandemic raging, whether or not it may be real biowarfare, or mainly psyops being waged upon the unsuspecting world's public in combination with other fabricated global threats, I am saying 'NO' to Swine Flu Vaccination. All this heavy-handed hullaballoo appears to me to be yet another “war on terrorism” to fabricate a global pretext for quite a different agenda from the publicized one. The real agenda this time around being to inoculate the world public with something inimical in the guise of fighting the pandemic. This is more than simply an attempt to sell vaccines of dubious efficacy for hefty corporate profiteering. It suspiciously appears to be the new “imperial mobilization” of the long wished for population reduction agenda, 'to “prime” populations worldwide'. The threat of the A/H1N1 virus killing some (or many) people may well be real even if manufactured, just like 911 – the “new pearl harbor” – was a real demonstration of fabricated threat by controlled demolition which killed many thousand people. But under these dubious 'sky is falling' conditions made to “look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality,” the most rational and commonsensical course of action under conflicting claims of vaccine safety and efficacy backed by draconian 'police-state' policies to forcibly administer it: 1) take one's statistical chances with the “pandemic” rather than with its forced “cure”; 2) permit the human body's own natural defenses to fight the disease if infected, rather than be aided into oblivion by its purported helper, the vaccine! (See Note on Vaccination for additional clarity)

Modern Medicine, Rockefellers, Big Pharma, Eugenics, Vaccination, and us

“Bed-bugs
cause smallpox! I had no idea. In Pakistan, as children, like all of
our generation in most developing nations, we were inoculated against
smallpox and I remember being taught that it was spread by human
contact!” --- Zahir Ebrahim's incredulous response to
the sleuthing by Twelfth
Bough
on their discovering the remarkable research
of Dr. Charles A. R. Campbell, M. D.
and the above revealing talk by medical research journalist Desiree
L. Rover.

“It
is not a world that any of us would want to live in. Is such a world
inevitable? It is not sure but there are two possible ways by which a
world of 10 billion people can be averted. Either the current birth
rates must come down more quickly or the current death rates must go
up. There is no other way.” ---
Robert McNamara, Speech to International bankers as Head of the World
Bank, October 2, 1970, cited in Population
control, US bio-weapons research, McNamara, Rockefeller, and AIDS

Eustace
Mullins' 1988 underground classic Murder
By Injection
also speaks to the same conspiracy by the Rockefeller controlled
medical profession – to vaccinate people to death and to blame
it on natural causes. The Swine
Flu Pandemic of 2009
came to underscore the same conclusions.

If
it is the latter, then how comes whenever I go to the doctor when I
am ill I usually come back healthy – I should be dead by now if
they were really trying to kill me! But if they are really trying to
heal me, why do they preclude the development of other non big-Pharma
related modalities of health care, such as alternate medicine?

Ushering in Big Brother: Inventing the CMOS Imaging Sensor - Good or Bad?

“Societal issues questions baggage I have been carrying around with me for a few years and I am going to unload on you ...
There is another set of issues which is loss of privacy from all this networking. When I first invented this CMOS image sensor technology we got a little bit of publicity and a reporter for the BBC radio came and talked to me, interviewed me, and he said:
'so tell me how you feel about the fact that now Big Brother is gonna be able so spy on us a lot better with all these cameras'.
And I said:
'oh it's not really a problem because there is not enough people to watch all the video screens and all cameras that are out there and we don't have to worry.'
But to my surprise, and chagrin a little bit, you know now computers can analyze images, and computer systems can track you based on facial recognition software from camera to camera to camera, as you might move around in a highly surveilled city for example.
And, so that means that you will be tracked and all your activity completely logged. It's on your permanent record now, whatever you did, or something you really don't want people to know about.
You know, is that a good thing? I don't think so. I feel like it's an invasion of my privacy. ...
I don't really like this application of my technology. There is nothing I can do about it, I have now unloaded that on you, so thank you.
We'll get back to the science and technology now, but I hope you also worry about these things and I especially hope you figure out what we are gonna do about this in the future.”
--- Dr. Eric Fossum, inventor of the CMOS imaging chip, the "camera-on-a-chip" technology which "is used in nearly all camera phones and webcams, digital-still cameras, high-speed motion capture cameras, automotive cameras, dental x-ray cameras, and swallowable pill cameras."

Remembering Steve Jobs

While
we honor this iconoclast for his peerless techno-visionary, for his
passions, for his spirit of love, there is something else we must
also ponder upon: The Legacy.

No,
not what is captured in his commencement speech. And no not what all
the presidents in the world, of nations and corporations, and nor all
the tens of millions of iphone and ipad users in the world, soon to
be billions, are remembering him for.

This
legacy is the seduction of, and the fascination with, technology
which has enabled The
Technetronic Era

Steve
Jobs was surely among its Greatest Master Builders – and I
surmise that to his last breadth, he remained unaware of it!

Modernity
Simplified

What
is all this verbiage by Project HumanbeingsfirstTM really
all about? Is there a reductionist and simplified explanation at the
level of a 'poor-man'?

Yes.
In the simplest terms: 'Might defines right'.

This
leads to “Hegemony is as old as mankind”.

That
in turn leads to the following psychological pathocracy – some
call it empire:

If
we don't have real enemies then we have to create or imagine some,
and yell 'we are being attacked' in order to, principally:

a)
justify one's hegemonic barbarianism upon others; and

b)
motivate an unwilling plebeian peoples into sacrificing for the
conquests of the oligarchic elite.

Euphemistically,
today as the winning empire, this is called “imperial
mobilization”.

Grotesquely,
for previously defeated empires, it is called “quest for
Lebensraum”.

That's
all there is to it.

All
which follows is only in further examination of how that is
accomplished under the veneer of “democracy”, because, in
the absence of such deception, “democracy is inimical to
imperial mobilization”. That quoted statement was made by
Zbigniew Brzezinski in his 1997 book: The Grand Chessboard –
American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives.

This
“quest for Lebensraum” (German
word for acquiring more space as an imperative), ahem,
“imperial mobilization” of the ruling oligarchy,
the ubermensch (German word for superior, above all others),
just happens to be the age-old quest for one-world government in
disguise.

It
is to be achieved piece-meal, incrementally, one fait accompli at a
time, one fabricated crisis at a time, one manufactured war at a
time, one real or imagined pestilence at a time, and one catastrophe
at a time.

The
psychological pathocracy of modern statecraft requires continuous
threats, crises, and uncertainty, to corral the democratic instincts
of the modern public into accepting the unpleasant totalitarian
agendas of the ruling oligarchy.

The
solution presented for addressing each uncertainty is the next
baby-step towards centralized global control of all humanity in a
global empire of the financial oligarchy.

That
world order, the new world order, as we can already perceive even in
its initial stages, is governed with moral relativism wherein, legal
opinions as those proclaimed by a United States Justice before its
Supreme Court, prevail:

'Nothing
is more certain in modern society than the principle that there are
no absolutes, that a name, a phrases, a standard has meaning only
when associated with the considerations which give birth to
nomenclature. To those who would paralyze our Government in the face
of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we
must reply that all concepts are relative.'

The
term 'oligarchic elite' refers to people who are several notches
above – and more hidden from public view in their enormous
wealth and their secretive exercise of 'social engineering' –
than what is typically understood by the term 'ruling elite', or
simply the 'elite'. The latter often refers to the generally affluent
1% of any society, more interested in being rich and running
corporations than in 'social engineering', and many among them can be
found in the Forbes' richest people listing.

But
one will never see a Rothschild, or David Rockefeller listed in
Forbes billionaires list. That's perhaps because they are
trillionaires, with all their massive wealth legally hidden behind
private tax-exempt foundations, and in their opaque ownership of
private banks, which in turn own many a private central bank! They
can muster vast sums of private monies for 'social engineering', and
administer untold funds through their tax-exempt foundations and
think-tanks. They are the proverbial 'king makers' who craft 'errand
boys' to do their policy bidding.

To
unmask them all before fait accompli is Project Humanbeingsfirst's
imperative – i.e., before it's all a done deal.

Ex
post facto, narrators can rehearse the deceptions and their
disentanglement all in the comforts of one-world government. And of
course laugh their way to fame and fortune just as today's narrators
call it erudite scholarship to openly rehearse the settlement of the
Americas and the genocide of millions of its indigenous peoples.

Even
the sixth graders in elementary schools today throughout the North
American continent learn of the choice between the gattling-gun
(force) and the small-pox laden bacteriological warfare (treachery)
magnanimously offered to the indigenous natives, without batting
their own eye-lids or offering a few tears in compensation.

Detachment
from history and from previous generations who inflict crimes upon
the 'lesser humanity', the 'untermenschen' (German word for
'lesser peoples'), evidently washes away both the evidence and the
guilt. But not the bold and often truthful narratives which become
openly public, and their bearers lauded scholars and touted
academics.

In
the transition to the modernity of today, the euphemisms have become
considerably refined with the march of Western civilization. It is
now the more egalitarian choice between “democracy”
(euphemism for force) and “revolution” (euphemism for
treachery) under the dialectical “either you are with us, or
you are with the terrorists”, that is being magnanimously
offered to the indigenous natives along the “arc of crisis”
in the “Global Zone of Percolating Violence”.
The objectives unfortunately remain the same as in antiquity –
by hook or by crook usurping what does not belong to one. The two
quoted descriptive phrases are once again Zbigniew Brzezinski's,
respectively from a January 15, 1979 Time magazine article titled
'IRAN: The Crescent of Crisis', and from Brzezinski's already
mentioned 1997 book.

Thusly,
in the case of our modernity as well, perhaps only our progeny might
also bear truthful witness to the crimes and sham of intellectualism
of their hypocritical ancestors – scholars, leaders,
military-men, holy-men, politicians, teachers, news-bearers, both in
the West and the East, on the left and the right – who hath
proclaimed to stand for truth, but who only aided and abetted vile
hegemonic power with their own convolutions and confabulations.
Modernity du jour is entirely unwilling to unravel their confusing
and deceptive narratives.

We
must wait a 100 years, or perhaps only 20, before anyone who is a
somebody will again truthfully proclaim how new 'smallpox laden
blankets' were used to fashion one-world government. Before then, it
is all to be dismissed as 'conspiracy theory'.

This
is why, as had been self-servingly predicted by the Council on
Foreign Relations in 1974:

'...
it will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to
use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end
run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will
accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.'

That,
in the simplest of terms, is Modernity Simplified to the level of a
'poor-man' (i.e., one with limited ability, or time, to carefully
read, write, and reason about the times one lives in).

Read
minimal expansion upon this basic explanation in The Poor-Man's
Guide to Modernity here.

Read
Project Humanbeingsfirst's Welcome
Letter
to comprehend a common man's role in that modernity.

Endorsement

If
you feel that any of the documents of Project Humanbeingsfirst speak
for you, that you ought to have authored them, then you may add your
public endorsement to the specific document as its virtual author of
conscience. A subsequent confirmation step is required. For
endorsement request, please click
here.

Contact

Legal-N-Things

Full Copyright Notice

All material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety, unmodified, for any purpose, granted, provided the full URL sentence and the copyright notice contained within each Document are also reproduced verbatim as part of this license, along with any embedded links within its main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All figures, images, quotations, and excerpts are used without permission based on non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research use only in the greater public interest. The usage is minimally consistent with the understanding of laws noted at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”. Exclusion: All rights are expressly reserved for the usage of the terms (c) HumanbeingsfirstTM and (c) HumanbeingfirstTM which are the copyrighted and trademarked intellectual property of Project HumanbeingsfirstTM. Reproduction Note: It is acceptable to reproduce any document in smaller serialized parts provided the full URL sentence and the copyright notice within each document are also reproduced in each part and the entire document is reproduced.

Legal Disclaimer Notice

1) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM asserts that as human beings first, one is entitled to all the inalienable Human Rights noted in http://www.hrweb.org/legal/undocs.html, including those of free thought and free expressions of those thoughts in addition to of course not being the victims of any hectoring hegemons. Freedom of expression stops at the threshold of justice. If one is offended by these simple moral truths, one has the equal right to not be here.

2) Project Humanbeingsfirst documents often contain external links as citations and references, and sometimes incorporate and/or embed external media content. The other content of these external websites, as well as the external links/media used by Project Humanbeingsfirst, is the sole responsibility of their respective owners/authors and Project Humanbeingsfirst cites each external link or embeds media content only for academic, scholarly, and/or documentation purpose as specifically pertaining to the topic at hand in its own presentation. Project Humanbeingsfirst is not affiliated with these external sources nor responsible for any of their actions, speech, or thoughts, whether legal or otherwise. 3) Public's voices added through comments or email or letter contact with Project Humanbeingsfirst, termed “contact voices”, come under the purview of “fair use” and may be reproduced and reused elsewhere without notice. 4) These “contact voices”, howsoever the contact is made, are obviously only their respective owner's, whomsoever they might be, and are not reflective of Project Humanbeingsfirst and nor is Project Humanbeingsfirst responsible for that or any other content owned/linked to by these “contact voices”. 5) Men and women of conscience who endorse the work of Project Humanbeingsfirst or become “virtual authors” of its documents as echoing their own heartfelt sentiments, or anyone in the world or on another planet links to Project Humanbeingsfirst documents, obviously do so at their own moral imperative, for their own purposes, and Project Humanbeingsfirst is not affiliated with them nor responsible for their actions, speech, or thoughts, whether legal or otherwise.

6) Any interference with peoples' rights to access the freely available documents of Project Humanbeingsfirst in any shape or form, is denying their unalienable right to be educated and informed, and is thus deemed akin to preventing the public from visiting a library making such interference liable under the same civil and/or criminal laws as might be applicable in such case.

7) Anything that is not covered above, is covered by the blanket statement that Project Humanbeingsfirst stands firm by its claim of being the Plebeian Antidote to Hectoring Hegemons. Project Humanbeingsfirst does not solicit funds nor accepts donations. All Project Humanbeingsfirst's opinions in any form, essays, reports, letters, books, etc., are completely gratis. Thus it is completely independent of all co-opting pressures, except perhaps that of the proverbial loaded gun with its trigger cocked when put to its head. When that happens, you may know it – look for complete silence, echoes of the hectoring hegemons' own core lies and axioms, and political science absurdities. It is entirely your responsibility to adjudicate Project Humanbeingsfirst's bombastic self-portrayal; to carefully validate its reports before accepting any opinion, informed or not, on the mere basis of its self-serving claim to forthrightness; and to think for yourself. Those who allow others to think for them, often end up prematurely dead. Most people, however, rather die than think, and evidently they do; Project Humanbeingsfirst is not in the 'saving' business. No opinion of Project Humanbeingsfirst should be deemed as offering any sort of advice, legal or medical advice, whether solicited or unsolicited, even when its positions at times may strongly and very boldly contradict conventional and/or official wisdom with copious commonsense and rational analyses to back it. You get what you paid – and you paid exactly zero monies here. There is no transaction.

8) Project Humanbeingsfirst is only responsible for its own work, both its credit, if any, and its penalties for taking its unvarnished positions in the pursuit of justice.

9) Any grievances against Project Humanbeingsfirst may be addressed in court. Please also see fine print in caveat emptor.

Caveat Emptor

Please be advised that Project HumanbeingsfirstTM fully cooperates with all law enforcement and other governmental agencies worldwide in rooting out Terrorism in all its nuanced shades and stripes in order to end its Neanderthal reign of terror upon all who are human beings first. Project Humanbeingsfirst does not distinguish between terrorists clad in turbans and those wearing suits, nor between the predatory rampages of the pirates vs. the emperors, albeit each is apportioned the measure of crime and guilt commensurate to their respective station of power and impact on their victims. Law enforcement personnel worldwide, but especially in the United States and the West, are encouraged to participate with Project Humanbeingsfirst. It is essential for all nations' state security apparatus to learn how to forensically identify the monumental supreme terrorists hiding in plain sight among us under legal cover, the real merchants of death, while they dutifully chase down the easy to spot handful of often deliberately manufactured pirates at sea.