On Jul 10, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:17:29 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
> wrote:
>> To make it clear, since i'll be on vacation and won't be very
>> responsive on email the coming week, the current syntax is not
>> acceptible to mozilla. If referring to the above rfcs is not an
>> option for some reason, we need to define the syntax in some other
>> way that disallows full uris that includes paths.
>
> I don't understand why it's not acceptible. You just shipped Firefox
> 3 which uses exactly this syntax for more or less the same purpose.
>
> (I will also be going on vacation soonish for what it's worth. 17
> Jul - 6 Aug.)
I hope the header names and values can be resolved before then.
- Maciej