Ever wanted to be in charge? Well, in my own little world I will be, one day. Just not quite yet. I'm a bit tired at the moment... maybe I'll take over after I've had my little nap.
The United Dingdom - stating the bleeding obvious so you don't have to.
(Sign up to get updates direct to email or follow @Battsby on Twitter)

Pages

Friday, 6 January 2017

Time and Motion

There is much fear and fervid chatter just lately, over
the rise of artificial intelligence and the future of the workforce, especially
that part of the workforce that doesn’t show much evidence of innate human
intelligence. For the supposedly alpha evolvers of the planet we are
particularly poor, en-masse, at
demonstrating why we deserve to occupy such a pre-eminent position on the
pyramid. But, to be fair, we’ve come a long way in keeping people in work, no
matter how hard they try to avoid it.

For example, as much as dyslexia is undoubtedly a genuine
suite of impairments to communication in the written form it is an unavoidable
fact, for the time being at least, that reading and writing are essential
skills in the general world of work. But is it really fair on the others when
students flourishing a statement furnished by somebody else with a vested interest
in justifying their own expertise are given extra assistance to attain the same
qualifications? Do we then provide readers and extra time on every job they do
where reading is required?

Should we be concerned when people who may have taken ten
attempts to pass their driving test are allowed to freely utilise our crowded
motorways? There used to be a requirement that electricians pass a colour
blindness test, but that’s now seen as discriminatory, so they are no longer
tested. But hey, how hard can it be: red to red, black to black... blue to bits.
What’s next, a ninety metre head start for 100m runners who are a bit tardy?
Multi-guess final practical assessments for neuro surgeons? Astronauts with acute travel
sickness? Maybe it’s time we re-thought the whole notion of access for all and just
let the machines take over where they can?

Of course, we will always need human intervention where
machines, as non-sentient assemblies of electro-mechanical components, cannot
make subtle decisions based on judgements and real human experience. Satnav,
for instance, can’t see the actual road ahead and the hugely expensive weather
forecasting computer models require meteorologists to study the prognosis and
say no, do it again. Machines aren’t perfect, yet, but it’s not so long ago
that attempts were made in industry to treat human workers as if they were mere
automata, an era from which I bring this cautionary tale.

At the Time and Motion Academy’s annual conference an expert
concluded his keynote lecture with the advice not to adopt the techniques too
readily in the home. He was asked why and went on to explain: “I watched my
wife's routine at breakfast for many years,” he said “and I saw that she made
many unnecessary trips between the fridge, the cooker, the table and the cupboards,
often carrying a single item at a time. One day I demonstrated to her how she
could be so much more efficient by rearranging the kitchen and considering
carrying more than one thing on each trip.” An audience member asked “Did it
save time?" And the expert replied “Actually, yes. It used to take her over
twenty minutes to make breakfast... Now I do it in under ten.”