-This innovative concept consists of hull and core where are held all 8 bteps of the work-flow which make the concept functional. The core has several gears and turbines which are responsible for these 8 steps (5 of them are dedicated to the turbo stages). The first step is fuel compression, followed by 2 cold turbo levels. The fourth step is where the fuel starts burning – combustion stage, which creates thrust for the next, 5th step – thrust step, which provides power to the planetary gears and turbines and moves the system. This step is followed by two hot turbo steps and the circle is enclosed by the final 8th step – bigger turbine. All this motion in a retrodynamic circumstance effect, wich is plus higher RPM speed of self reaction motion, because is like when something go to a something is coming. Its a Rotary-Turbo-InFlow Technique principle.

In an an attempt to be more welcoming and less snarky(see other recent threads)

I suspect part of your translation is wrong where you have looses( a loose wheel might fall off) I think it should be losses as in inefficiencies

And although I am interested in tech at the edges so to speak the thing with HHO stuff is that that according to science as we now know it there are conversion losses going from water to HHO and back again and whereas I could see that adding it to a traditional internal combustion engine running on hydrocarbons might increase the overall burn efficiency of the aforesaid hydrocarbons especially with the low compressibility of the produced super heated steam in the system.I am doubtful of any benefits of using it by itself unless see caveat below:-

I don't think you are going to benefit from using purely water and HHO unless there really is something in some of the cold fusion effects(the slow neutron one being my favourite for having a bit of plausibility) if you think this might be the case you may find this link interesting as they are trying to get some verifiable experiments done on possible HHO cold fusion effects here:-

And after all most peculiar is that I solved the technical question, and the whole concept (closed) of the system is completed around the proces flow, the project I am presenting is only the power plant. and the whole enchilada is supported by the system effciency.

Another "Engineering by Autocad". Some (most) things that work on paper, aren't practical. Off hand flaws: For one thing the centripetal loads on the little planetary compressor turbine shafts will be tremendous at any reasonable rpm. Next, and as typical for these schemes, sealing is almost impossible, and lastly, it accomplishes in Rube Goldburg fashion what the "simple" axial turbine engine already does.