Developmental Perspectives on Lesbian and Gay Politics: Fragmented Citizenship in a Fragmented State

Responding to recent criticism that American political development (APD) has yet to fully engage with both contemporary and historical matters related to lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) politics, I use citizenship to provide one way to do so. Drawing on the central insight of APD scholarship that the polity is a composite of multiple clashing governing orders and by viewing citizenship as a relational dynamic between the individual and the state, I argue that citizenship is fractured across time, space, and policy issue. This claim is illustrated by two case studies: first, how gay, lesbian, and bisexual military participation has been redefined over time by the Department of Defense, with each policy shift toward equality revealing previously unseen and persistent inequities, and second, how conflicts between marriage and parental recognition have emerged after states recognize same-sex marriage. I aim to demonstrate how APD concepts can be fruitfully applied to yield new insights about institutional authority and the meaning and content of citizenship status. In short, much can be gained by increased developmental attention to gay and lesbian politics.

D’Emilio, John. 1983. Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities: The Making of a Homosexual Minority in the United States, 1940–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Engel, Stephen M. 2001. The Unfinished Revolution: Social Movement Theory and the Gay and Lesbian Movement. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Engel, Stephen M. 2007. “Organizational Identity as a Constraint on Strategic Action: A Comparative Analysis of Gay and Lesbian Interest Groups.”Studies in American Political Development21 (Spring): 66–91.

Engel, Stephen M. 2014. “Seeing Sexuality: State Development and the Fragmented Status of LGBTQ Citizenship.” In The Oxford Handbook of American Political Development, ed. Lieberman, R., Mettler, S., and Valelly, R.. New York: Oxford University Press.

Epstein, Steven. 1999. “Gay and Lesbian Movements in the United States: Dilemmas of Identity, Diversity, and Political Strategy.” In The Global Emergence of Gay and Lesbian Politics: National Imprints of a Worldwide Movement, ed. Adam, B. D., Duyvendak, J. W., and Krouwel, A.. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Eskridge, WilliamJr., and. Spedale, Darren R.2009. Gay Marriage: For Better or for Worse? What We’ve Learned from the Evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hacker, J. 1998. “The Historical Logic of National Health Insurance: Structure and Sequence in the Development of British, Canadian, and U.S. Medical Policy.”Studies in American Political Development12 (Spring): 57–130.

Hagel, Chuck. Secretary of Defense. 2013. “Memorandum for Secretaries of the Military Departments, Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness.”Subject: Extending Benefits to Same-Sex Spouses of Military Members.” August 13.

Kymlicka, Will and Norman, Wayne. 1995. “Return of the Citizen: A Survey of Recent Work onCitizenship Theory.” In Theorizing Citizenship, ed. Beiner, Ronald. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Mettler, Suzanne. 2005. Soldiers to Citizens: The G.I. Bill and the Making of the Greatest Generation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mettler, Suzanne, and Milstein, Andrew. 2007. “American Political Development from Citizens’ Perspective: Tracking Federal Government’s Presence in Individual Lives over Time.”Studies in American Political Development21 (Spring): 110–130.

Mucciaroni, Gary. 2008. Same Sex, Different Politics: Success and Failure in the Struggles over Gay Rights. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Mucciaroni, Gary. 2011. “The Study of LGBT Politics and Its Contributions to Political Science.”PS: Political Science & Politics44 (January): 17–21.

Murakawa, Naomi. 2008. “The Origins of the Carceral Crisis: Racial Order as ‘Law and Order’ in Postwar American Politics.” In Race and American Political Development, ed. Lowndes, Joseph, Novkov, Julie, and Warren, Dorian T.. New York. Routledge.

Orren, Karen. 1991. Belated Feudalism: Labor, the Law, and Liberal Development in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Orren, Karen, and Skowronek, Stephen. 2004. The Search for American Political Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Orren, Karen, and Skowronek, Stephen. 2014. “Pathways to the Present: Political Development in America.” In Oxford Handbook on American Political Development, ed. Lieberman, R., Mettler, S., and Valelly, R.. New York: Oxford University Press.

Panetta, Leon. Secretary of Defense. 2013. “Memorandum for Secretaries of the Military Departments Acting Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, Subject: Extending Benefits to Same-Sex Domestic Partners of Military Members.” February 11. http://www.defense.gov/news/same-sexbenefitsmemo.pdf, accessed May 31, 2013.

Peters, Jeremy. 2013. “Senate Approves Ban on Antigay Violence in the Workplace.”New York Times, November 7.

Pascoe, Peggy. 2009. What Comes Naturally: Miscegenation Law and the Making of Race in America. New York: Oxford University Press.

Valelly, Richard. “LGBT Politics and American Political Development.”Annual Review of Political Science15: 313–332.

Wallenstein, Peter. 1999. “Law and the Boundaries of Place and Race in Interracial Marriage: Interstate Comity, Racial Identity, and Miscegenation Laws in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia, 1860s–1960s.”Akron Law Review32: 557–576.

Warner, Michael. 1993. “Introduction.” In Fear of a Queer Planet: Queer Politics and Social Theory, ed. Warner, M.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Wegman, Jesse. 2014. “Scalia Has Seen the Future, and Its Name Is Marriage Equality.”New York Times, February 14.

Write, J., Acting Under Secretary of Defense, “Memorandum for Secretaries of the Military Departments Chiefs of the Military Services.” Subject: Clarifying Policy – Administrative Absence to Obtain a Legal Marriage, September 4, 2013.