NO, I think I would keep Lee Evans considering the dude is a stud and no one in the draft has proven jack yet....If anyone is willing to give up their teams best player for # 1 then you shouldn't be a GM or your team really stinks

Well... as a Jets fan, it's hard. We have no 1 big named top of the line player. Who is our best player? The young and talented (but still learning the 3-4) former defensive rookie of the year Jon Vilma? The should-be pro bowler and former All-Rookie team Safety Kerry Rhodes? The top 10 in the NFL over the past 3 years DE Shaun Ellis? The top 10 QB when healthy, but oft injured Chad Pennington? The recently traded for RB Thomas Jones? Last year's late 1st round pick Nick Mangold? Last year's early first round pick D'Brickashaw Ferguson, who is more talented than Nick Mangold, but was outperformed this year? The tenacious and speedy WR Laveranues Coles?

Depends on which one you'd choose. I'd keep D'Brick, Mangold, Vilma, and Ellis. The others I would trade.

If you traded Dansby for the #1 overall pick and drafted Calvin Johnson, you would have the sickest WR core ever.

Then you would have the #5 overall pick. Trade down with that pick to around #20 and draft Dwayne Jarrett and would pick up a lot of day one picks with that trade. You spend the rest of the picks on Oline and you would produce the most dominant offense ever.

It'd be tough with the Seahawks. Factoring in that we could trade the pick, grab someone like Thomas, Branch, Adams, or even Landry, and have a multitude of other picks or players, that'd be very tough to pass up, especially with Walter slowly going on the decline. It'd scrap the Super Bowl hopes for the year most likely, but looking towards the future, I don't know.

As for the Jets, considering their best player is Vilma, I'd do it. I love the guy, but he realistically isn't the greatest fit for the 3-4 and with CJ there, I'd have to do it.

I would say our best player is Morrison (maybe Burgess) and while he'd be a tough player to lose, it would be a no brainer to trade him for the #1 (or in our case #2 pick). We could always get Patrick Willis in a trade down but the likely scenario is we get Russell and CJ, which is a great foundation to set for an offense. That could be an incredible QB-WR combo.

Michael Vick? No. He's a 27-year QB, with as much physical talent as anyone in this draft class. He still has time to harness his abilities, on a consistent basis. If he can do so, under the tutelage of Bobby Petrino, and Hue Jackson, watch out.

Drew Brees for the #1? Nah... Drews in his prime. Deuce for the #1? Sure.

Please. I wouldn't trade Deuce for the #1 pick either.

__________________
The whole world loves neophyte athletic tight end Jimmy Graham from Miami with the 95th pick. "Best pick in the draft,'' one AFC coach told me. "Give him time, and in that offense, he'll be better than [Jeremy] Shockey by the start of next year.''

“We know that no matter the adversity, be it the lockout, be it the suspension or be it a hurricane, our men will pull together and defend the honor of this city. We’ve shown we’ve been able to do that.” - Jabari Greer

yaa id trade our best player for CJ...but id have to have something like a conditional clause, if CJ doesnt put up the numbers i want then i get vilma or rhodes back...so most definately not, i'll never trade a known great player in the NFL for a NFL prospect no matter how much of a sure thing he seems

__________________
"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time."

Torry Holt for Calvin Johnson. You know what? I would probably do it. Holt is on the wrong side of 30, and has 4-5 good years left at best, and CJ has the potential to be even better than Holt. So yeah, I'd do it.

I would rather trade for multiple first round picks or a first rounder and plus a slew a picks. I would rather have the isurance of having a more picks that at least a few of them will pan out, then paying a bunch of gauranteed money to an uproven player.