I think he meant recognition of faults in our leaders governance and offering better alternatives for the benefit of the society... Actually they must be against constructive critisms because most in their respective positions are there for their own interests.. Changing the policies and taking corrective measures would turn their game upside down an reveal their blunderz!

Are you serious that you dont understand what constructive criticism is? This is also great thinker!! Lol

Click to expand...

Criticism at itself is not that simple to point out if its 'contructive' Or 'destructive'. It is a relative term in the sense a single emulated criticism may be Constructive to one and Destructive to another.

When we talk and apply critism to Leadership we are not neccessarily talking about Government Leaders BUT to the whole entity of Leadership as a whole. I.e Firms, Companies, Religious, Health based, others as well as the Govt. Well as thee govt is the one which is smashed with utmost criticism - I pluck it as my case in the matter.

The trouble how ever in Ivuga's brief post lies in the fact that in which group of crirtism should we focus? (if at all we are talking about Govt leaders).