"There will be more instances like this, and we will need to have a much
better understanding about what is appropriate," House Intelligence
Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R., Mich.) said in an interview
Thursday. "We have a long-standing tradition that the judiciary does not
interfere with investigations. This sets a very dangerous precedent."

...

Andrew Arena, the former head of the Detroit office of the Federal
Bureau of Investigation when it handled the case of the plane "underwear
bomber'' in 2009, said he thought the Boston case was handled properly.

"When you bring the judge into it, that's what's going to happen.
They don't work for the Justice Department, they don't work for Capitol
Hill, they are going to do what they are legally obligated to do,'' said
Mr. Arena. "I think [investigators] got what they were going to get out
of him, anyway.''

"There will be more instances like this, and we will need to have a much
better understanding about what is appropriate," House Intelligence
Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R., Mich.) said in an interview
Thursday. "We have a long-standing tradition that the judiciary does not
interfere with investigations. This sets a very dangerous precedent."

...

Andrew Arena, the former head of the Detroit office of the Federal
Bureau of Investigation when it handled the case of the plane "underwear
bomber'' in 2009, said he thought the Boston case was handled properly.

"When you bring the judge into it, that's what's going to happen.
They don't work for the Justice Department, they don't work for Capitol
Hill, they are going to do what they are legally obligated to do,'' said
Mr. Arena. "I think [investigators] got what they were going to get out
of him, anyway.''