Have you ever wondered why judges and justices wear robes, especially black robes? The tradition of wearing judicial robes dates back to the judges of the King’s Bench in 15th century England. Some courts in England required different colors of robes depending on the season or type of case. In the United States Supreme Court, justices wore red robes until 1801, when Chief Justice John Marshall set a new tradition by wearing a black robe for his swearing-in ceremony. Since that time, most judges and justices in America have been wearing black. The color black is perceived as a symbol of the dignity and solemnity of the judicial office. The robe itself, in covering most of the body except the head, is a visible symbol that a litigant or attorney appearing before a judge is dealing not with an individual, but with the court and the State and principles of justice.

On September 10, 2015, the Florida Supreme Court sua sponte (on its own initiative) adopted a new rule, Rule 2.340 of the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, to emphasize the dignity and solemnity of the office of judge as the one charged with dispensing equal justice under the law. The rule seeks to uphold the dignity of judicial proceedings by requiring judges to wear a solid black robe with no embellishment.

The Florida Rules of Judicial Administration apply to administrative matters in all Florida courts. The rules are intended to promote the “speedy and inexpensive determination of every proceeding to which they are applicable,” and they supersede all conflicting rules and statutes. The Supreme Court often considers proposals from a committee regarding amendments or new rules. In this case, the Court initiated the proposal for the new Rule 2.340 and solicited comments from the Rules of Judicial Administration Committee, the Conference of County Court Judges, the Conference of Circuit Court Judges, and the Conference of District Court of Appeal Judges.

After considering comments and reflecting on the Court’s responsibility to provide clear direction when needed to promote public trust and confidence in the judicial branch, the Florida Supreme Court adopted new Rule 2.340 to provide: “During any judicial proceeding, robes worn by a judge must be solid black with no embellishment.” As support, the Court cited similar rules from Alaska, California, and Wisconsin.

The Court pointed out the impact that the dignity and uniformity of judges’ attire can have on litigants and the public, as solemn and uniform attire honors the judicial office and helps maintain confidence in our legal system. As the “arbiters of facts and law for the resolution of disputes,” Florida’s judges are the “face of the judicial branch of government” and “a highly visible symbol of government under the rule of law.” Thus, “when a litigant appears in court, it is the presiding judge who sets the tone of the proceedings, puts those in attendance at ease, and maintains order and decorum throughout the proceedings, all of which establishes confidence in the legal process,” the Court explained.

In the spirit of those principles, the Florida Supreme Court noted that “presiding judges wearing different colored robes or robes with varying embellishments” could result in uncertainty or confusion for those coming before our courts. “The possibility that the unique attire of the judge assigned to one’s case could raise these concerns and thereby diminish public trust and confidence in the proceedings is not acceptable,” the Court ruled. Thus, “promoting uniformity in judicial attire, by requiring all judges to wear unembellished, solid black robes, will no doubt avoid these concerns and promote public trust and confidence.”

Of course, analogous principles apply to attorneys, who normally wear respectable business suits or business-like dresses in court, as they are officers of the court and have a role in upholding the dignity of the judicial system. For both lawyers and judges, the style and formality of court attire can have a positive impact in recognizing the importance of court proceedings. As the Supreme Court observed, “The people of Florida have a right to expect equal justice every day, in every court in this state….” If you are involved in an appeal, or you want advice about your rights, the attorneys of The Law Offices of Robin Bresky are available to discuss how they can help achieve equal justice under the law.

The Law Offices of Robin Bresky is a dedicated appellate law firm handling
civil and criminal court appeals in all District Courts of Appeal in
Florida. The firm also provides effective trial and litigation support.
The firm serves Boca Raton, Delray Beach, Boynton Beach, West Palm Beach,
Coral Springs, Parkland, Margate, Lauderhill, Fort Lauderdale, Deerfield
Beach, Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Counties, and all the trial courts and
lower tribunals within the jurisdiction of the Fourth District Court of
Appeal, the federal Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, and the Florida
Supreme Court and all other appellate courts in Florida, including the
appellate divisions of the circuit courts (which hear appeals from county
courts).

Boca Raton Office

Bank of America Building

150 East Palmetto Park Rd.
Suite 340
Boca Raton,FL33432-4848

West Palm Beach Office

West Palm Beach

319 Clematis Street
Suite 1006
West Palm Beach,FL33401

Miami Office

One Biscayne Tower

2 S. Biscayne Blvd
Suite 3760
Miami,FL33131(Available by Appointment)

Phone

Email

Connect With Us

The information on this website is for general information purposes
only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any
individual case or situation. This information is not intended to
create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client
relationship.

No content on this site may be reused in any fashion without written
permission from The Law Offices of Robin Bresky.