Archive for the ‘Mishneh Torah’ Category

The keys for decoding the Chabad deceptions in the following report are as follows:

“It is incumbent upon the individual to drink on Purim until he can no longer distinguish between praising Mordechai and cursing Haman.” (Babylonian Talmud, Megillah, 7b)

“If we see that a Gentile’s life is in danger, we should not save him.” (Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Avodah Kochavim, 10:1)

These ungodly precepts of Orthodox Judaism are published on Chabad’s own website HERE and HERE. Evidently, they are practiced to this day.

Non-Judaic people, especially Christians, have been bashed over the head with guilt for 60 years for allegedly not doing enough to save ‘The Jews’ from ‘The Holocaust’ when the holy books of ‘The Jews’ tell them not to save the lives of non-‘Jews’ when they are in danger. The double-standard is so outrageous, it’s inconceivable to most people.

People, wake up. Your alleged leaders are forcing relations with the followers of these depraved traditions. There could not be more treacherous direction than this.

Ormond Beach man who drank at Jewish gathering dies in parking lot

Patricio G. Balona – Daytona Beach News-Journal

March 15, 2012

ORMOND BEACH — A man who was drinking at a Jewish holiday party was found dead in the parking lot of the center where members left him to sleep, police said Wednesday.

Jesse Allen, 28, who moved to Ormond Beach from Meadville, Pa., in November, was found dead Friday morning by the rabbi of the synagogue, a police report shows.

“It was a death that is apparently related to a possible alcohol poisoning,” said Ormond Beach police Lt. Kenny Hayes. “There is nothing suspicious about the death.”

An autopsy was completed Tuesday, but police are awaiting toxicology test results to determine what killed Allen, Hayes said.

Allen was at a party at the Chabad Lubavitch of Greater Daytona at 1079 W. Granada Blvd., the night before he was found dead, Hayes said.

Rabbi Pinchas Ezagui, 46, said in a telephone interview that at least 100 people were celebrating Purim, a Jewish holiday in which people dress up in costumes.

“It was a very joyous party, a party for family and children,” Ezagui said.

Purim is a festive Jewish holiday recounting the deliverance of the Jewish people from an extermination plot by Haman, as recounted in the Bible’s Book of Esther. Along with a festive meal, heavy drinking used to be part of the tradition, though that is officially discouraged now, according to the website meirpanim.org [“officially” heavy drinking is said to be discouraged in P.R. material directed towards the public, but this is not so in actual practice].

Ezagui said alcohol was not served at Thursday’s party, though some families brought alcoholic beverages with them.

“We don’t serve it, but there is a bottle here and a bottle there,” Ezagui said.

The rabbi told police he saw Allen come into the building for the party about 8 p.m. Thursday.

Later, Ezagui saw Allen was intoxicated to the point that he had urinated in his pants, the report states.

A member of the Jewish group, Igor Nikomarov, 24, escorted Allen out of the center. Nikomarov left Allen on the grass to sleep his drunkenness off, police said. Nikomarov did not return a reporter’s call seeking comment Wednesday.

“It is a very unfortunate situation,” Ezagui said. “We don’t know the guy. He is not of the Jewish faith.”

Allen’s mother, Lynn Allen, said her son loved Jewish tradition and in an email he told her he was excited to go the Purim.

She said her son loved to play drums and guitar and “sang like an angel and composed praise songs.” She will always remember her son as a giving and helpful person. Just before he left Pennsylvania, Jesse Allen gave his bicycle, his only means of transportation, to an Afghanistan veteran who had been on three tours in the war, his mother said.

Lynn Allen said her son was working on overcoming a problem with alcohol and she thought he had stopped drinking recently. She was struggling to understand why her son was left on the grass after the party.

“It’s not the rabbi’s fault that my son drank,” Lynn Allen said. “But as a community we look after each other and in Pennsylvania we are struggling to understand why they left him there.”

It is strictly forbidden to moser [inform the non-Judaic authorities on] either a Jewish person or his property. One who mosers a Jewish person or his property has no share in the world to come. (Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat, 388)

More on Orthodox Judaism’s code of omerta in Judaism Discovered, pp. 426-429.

But there’s little public outcry coming from his synagogue, B’nai Israel Congregation, and Jewish law may be part of the reason.

At the first Saturday service after Shereshevsky’s Aug. 11 arrest, Rabbi Chaim Silver reminded members that Judaism forbids gossip, also known as “lashon hara,” or evil speech.

Participants at the service said Silver did not cite the scandal. But they said the connection was as obvious as the shock generated by the allegations against Shereshevsky.

“I don’t think there’s a single person in the community it hasn’t affected in some way, just because he was a benefactor and so many people had invested in or worked for him,” said a member who asked not to be identified.

Silver did not return several calls for comment. Other members also did not return calls, or refused to comment on Shereshevsky.

Shereshevsky is accused by the Securities and Exchange Commission of diverting $100 million from investors with WexTrust Capital, where he was chief operating officer. His business partner, Steven Byers, also was charged.

Prosecutors call it an affinity-fraud case because Shereshevsky allegedly targeted other Orthodox Jews, in addition to other individuals …

The silences may reflect not only the ban on gossip but a Jewish custom that frowns on being a “moser,” or informant, said Samuel Heilman. A sociologist at City University of New York, Heilman writes about American Judaism and Orthodox Jews.

“The moser is somebody who hands over, literally, information that is hurtful regarding Jews to someone – to the authorities,” he said. The custom harkens to Jewish historical experience with anti-Semitic civic authorities.

It is strictly forbidden to moser [inform the non-Judaic authorities on] either a Jewish person or his property. One who mosers a Jewish person or his property has no share in the world to come. (Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat, 388)

More on Orthodox Judaism’s code of omerta in Judaism Discovered, pp. 426-429.

But there’s little public outcry coming from his synagogue, B’nai Israel Congregation, and Jewish law may be part of the reason.

At the first Saturday service after Shereshevsky’s Aug. 11 arrest, Rabbi Chaim Silver reminded members that Judaism forbids gossip, also known as “lashon hara,” or evil speech.

Participants at the service said Silver did not cite the scandal. But they said the connection was as obvious as the shock generated by the allegations against Shereshevsky.

“I don’t think there’s a single person in the community it hasn’t affected in some way, just because he was a benefactor and so many people had invested in or worked for him,” said a member who asked not to be identified.

Silver did not return several calls for comment. Other members also did not return calls, or refused to comment on Shereshevsky.

Shereshevsky is accused by the Securities and Exchange Commission of diverting $100 million from investors with WexTrust Capital, where he was chief operating officer. His business partner, Steven Byers, also was charged.

Prosecutors call it an affinity-fraud case because Shereshevsky allegedly targeted other Orthodox Jews, in addition to other individuals …

The silences may reflect not only the ban on gossip but a Jewish custom that frowns on being a “moser,” or informant, said Samuel Heilman. A sociologist at City University of New York, Heilman writes about American Judaism and Orthodox Jews.

“The moser is somebody who hands over, literally, information that is hurtful regarding Jews to someone – to the authorities,” he said. The custom harkens to Jewish historical experience with anti-Semitic civic authorities.

In places of Judaic dominance such as NY we are increasingly seeing that rabbinic law (halakha) trumps the law of the land in cases such as the one reported below, the case of the herpes-infected mohel from 2005, in numerous cases of rabbinic child molestation, fraud and others.

It is strictly forbidden to moser [inform the non-Judaic authorities on] either a Jewish person or his property. One who mosers a Jewish person or his property has no share in the world to come. (Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat, 388)

Jewish code snarls probe into Crown Heights attack

BY LARRY McSHANEDAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Friday, May 9th 2008, 4:00 AM

Long before the first rapper stopped snitching or any Mafiosi swore an oath of omertà, there was the Jewish law of mesira.

The tenet that forbids Jews from informing on fellow Jews is one of the hurdles facing Brooklyn prosecutors probing the April 14 attack on a black man by two Jewish men, sources told the Daily News.

Authorities – invoking a complaint long cited in cases involving rappers – said the initial probe was hindered by the local Hasidim’s refusal to cooperate.

One source suggested the Orthodox community was taking a page from the rap world’s “stop snitching” handbook. But it was actually lifted directly from the Code of Jewish Law.

“The Hebrew word is mesira, which means basically you are not allowed to be an informant,” said Rabbi Shea Hecht, a well-known figure in Crown Heights.

“In essence, I am not allowed to snitch, period.”

The attack in Crown Heights led Brooklyn District Attorney Charles Hynes to empanel an investigative grand jury to try to shake loose reluctant witnesses. It’s the same technique prosecutors tried unsuccessfully in the slaying of rapper Busta Rhymes’ bodyguard in 2006.

Rhymes and about 50 other witnesses refused to cooperate with cops. Their decision was based on street cred. The slaying remains unsolved.

When college student Andrew Charles was attacked in Crown Heights by two men wearing yarmulkes last month, police quickly identified a suspect – the driver of the getaway SUV.

Menachem Ezagui came to the 71st Precinct stationhouse with a lawyer after the vehicle was discovered. Police sources said he refused to answer any questions.

Charles, 20, the son of a city cop, was walking on Albany Ave. when a bicycle-riding assailant sprayed him with Mace. The SUV then pulled up, with a second man jumping out to smash the college sophomore twice with a nightstick, police said.

Cops have made no arrests. A lawyer sought to broker a deal that would have led two Jewish suspects to surrender on reduced charges. Sources said the district attorney’s office rejected the deal, insisting the attack was too severe.

According to Hecht, mesira is not an all-encompassing concept – common sense supersedes the law, as does the responsibility of preventing injury to others. “You’re not allowed to stand on the blood of your brother,” he said.

That comes with a loophole, too. If Jews are convinced that one of their own will not get a fair shake from authorities, they have no obligation to cooperate.

“There are double standards – sometimes they work to your advantage,” Hecht said. “To think there’s no political element to justice in America would be foolish.”

In places of Judaic dominance such as NY we are increasingly seeing that rabbinic law (halakha) trumps the law of the land in cases such as the one reported below, the case of the herpes-infected mohel from 2005, in numerous cases of rabbinic child molestation, fraud and others.

It is strictly forbidden to moser [inform the non-Judaic authorities on] either a Jewish person or his property. One who mosers a Jewish person or his property has no share in the world to come. (Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat, 388)

Jewish code snarls probe into Crown Heights attack

BY LARRY McSHANEDAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Friday, May 9th 2008, 4:00 AM

Long before the first rapper stopped snitching or any Mafiosi swore an oath of omertà, there was the Jewish law of mesira.

The tenet that forbids Jews from informing on fellow Jews is one of the hurdles facing Brooklyn prosecutors probing the April 14 attack on a black man by two Jewish men, sources told the Daily News.

Authorities – invoking a complaint long cited in cases involving rappers – said the initial probe was hindered by the local Hasidim’s refusal to cooperate.

One source suggested the Orthodox community was taking a page from the rap world’s “stop snitching” handbook. But it was actually lifted directly from the Code of Jewish Law.

“The Hebrew word is mesira, which means basically you are not allowed to be an informant,” said Rabbi Shea Hecht, a well-known figure in Crown Heights.

“In essence, I am not allowed to snitch, period.”

The attack in Crown Heights led Brooklyn District Attorney Charles Hynes to empanel an investigative grand jury to try to shake loose reluctant witnesses. It’s the same technique prosecutors tried unsuccessfully in the slaying of rapper Busta Rhymes’ bodyguard in 2006.

Rhymes and about 50 other witnesses refused to cooperate with cops. Their decision was based on street cred. The slaying remains unsolved.

When college student Andrew Charles was attacked in Crown Heights by two men wearing yarmulkes last month, police quickly identified a suspect – the driver of the getaway SUV.

Menachem Ezagui came to the 71st Precinct stationhouse with a lawyer after the vehicle was discovered. Police sources said he refused to answer any questions.

Charles, 20, the son of a city cop, was walking on Albany Ave. when a bicycle-riding assailant sprayed him with Mace. The SUV then pulled up, with a second man jumping out to smash the college sophomore twice with a nightstick, police said.

Cops have made no arrests. A lawyer sought to broker a deal that would have led two Jewish suspects to surrender on reduced charges. Sources said the district attorney’s office rejected the deal, insisting the attack was too severe.

According to Hecht, mesira is not an all-encompassing concept – common sense supersedes the law, as does the responsibility of preventing injury to others. “You’re not allowed to stand on the blood of your brother,” he said.

That comes with a loophole, too. If Jews are convinced that one of their own will not get a fair shake from authorities, they have no obligation to cooperate.

“There are double standards – sometimes they work to your advantage,” Hecht said. “To think there’s no political element to justice in America would be foolish.”

Contrary to common belief, proselytism is a very important part of Judaism. But the rabbis don’t seek new converts to Judaism. Judaism is only for “The Jews.” The rabbis have concocted a lower-tier religion for non-“Jews” who they hold to be of a lower-tier species than so-called “Jews”.

From Rabbi Shlomo Riskin writing for the Jerusalem Post:

And Maimonides rules that only the Jews must keep the 613 commandments for ultimate “salvation”; it is enough for the gentile world to accept the Seven Noahide Laws of morality (Laws of Kings [Hilchot Melachim] 8,10).

But we certainly must proselytize every human being to keep those seven laws – do not worship an idol, do not misuse God’s Name, do not murder, do not commit licentious sexual acts, do not steal, respect all creatures, and create a judicial system to enforce the first six laws. (Rabbi Shlomo Riskin, “Parashat Yitro: Every Knee Shall Bend,” Jerusalem Post, Jan 24, 2008)

Rabbi Riskin fails to mention how Maimonides provided for the distinctness of the two-tiered Judaic system of law to be enforced:

A gentile who studies Torah is liable to the death penalty. They should be involved in the study of their Seven Mitzvot [“Noahide Laws”] only. (Moses Maimonides, Hilchot Melachim 10:9, Moznaim Publishing edition)

And so you see, rabbinic Judaism compels Judaic people to seek proselytes not to their own religion, but to a lower-tier system which the rabbis fabricted for non-“Jews:” the so-called “Noahide Laws.” It is worth mentioning, however, that cajoling proselytism to the “Noahide Laws” would turn to convert-or-die compulsion where Judaic rule is open and fully consolidated.

In 2004 JPII misrepresented his elder brother Maimonides and his murderous system of “proselytizing,” praising Maimonides as a figure of benevolence, and rejoicing in his vision of the Judaic Messianic age, which Maimonides wrote would be a time when all Christians would either give up their fundamental beliefs and accept the talmudic “Noahide Laws” or be executed. More on that here:

Contrary to common belief, proselytism is a very important part of Judaism. But the rabbis don’t seek new converts to Judaism. Judaism is only for “The Jews.” The rabbis have concocted a lower-tier religion for non-“Jews” whom they hold to be of a lower-tier species than so-called “Jews”.

From Rabbi Shlomo Riskin writing for the Jerusalem Post:

And Maimonides rules that only the Jews must keep the 613 commandments for ultimate “salvation”; it is enough for the gentile world to accept the Seven Noahide Laws of morality (Laws of Kings [Hilchot Melachim] 8,10).

But we certainly must proselytize every human being to keep those seven laws – do not worship an idol, do not misuse God’s Name, do not murder, do not commit licentious sexual acts, do not steal, respect all creatures, and create a judicial system to enforce the first six laws. (Rabbi Shlomo Riskin, “Parashat Yitro: Every Knee Shall Bend,” Jerusalem Post, Jan 24, 2008)

Rabbi Riskin fails to mention how Maimonides provided for the distinctness of the two-tiered Judaic system of law to be enforced:

A gentile who studies Torah is liable to the death penalty. They should be involved in the study of their Seven Mitzvot [“Noahide Laws”] only. (Moses Maimonides, Hilchot Melachim 10:9, Moznaim Publishing edition)

And so you see, rabbinic Judaism compels Judaic people to seek proselytes not to their own religion, but to a lower-tier system which the rabbis fabricted for non-“Jews:” the so-called “Noahide Laws.” It is worth mentioning, however, that cajoling proselytism to the “Noahide Laws” would turn to convert-or-die compulsion where Judaic rule is open and fully consolidated.

In 2004 JPII misrepresented his elder brother Maimonides and his murderous system of “proselytizing,” praising Maimonides as a figure of benevolence, and rejoicing in his vision of the Judaic Messianic age, which Maimonides wrote would be a time when all Christians would either give up their fundamental beliefs and accept the talmudic “Noahide Laws” or be executed. More on that here:

The following is a response from the author of the book, The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow, Constance Cumbey, to the recent blog posting titled “The Real Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow” which can be found at this link:

Clearly the Jews are equally a target of New Age planners along with Christians — Catholic and Protestant, and even Moslems. A key strategy is to pit target groups off against each other. One only has to read the Alice Bailey books to see that Jews are the most despised of all the New Age targets. I have made clear links between the Historical Revisionist Movement and the New Age Movement, between Eustace Mullins, Ezra Pound etc and the New Age Movement. The New Agers label the “rainbow” as “antahkarana” or “rainbow bridge between the personality and oversoul.

I do not know you, but your site looks disturbingly like anti-Jewish propaganda to me. Please do not imply that I endorse such. I do not.

CONSTANCE E. CUMBEY

In response I should say that I have not implied that Constance Cumbey endorses anti-“Jewish” propaganda. Neither have I written anything about Ezra Pound or Eustace Mullins, which begs the question, what do these things have to do with what I have written? This wouldn’t be an attempt to imply an endorsement of Pound, Mullins and New Ageism from me, would it? Perhaps Mrs. Cumbey will extend me the same courtesy which she asks for herself.

I will make clear that I do see virtue in the practice of historical revisionism in it’s best form, which is the reassessment of historical people, places and events in light of new evidence. I fail to see how any person who honors truth could be opposed to this concept. To reject it would be to allow propaganda and errors which often become part of the established historical record to remain set in stone. If Cumbey is opposed to historical revisionism, that’s her right, but to imply that historical revisionism is directly connected with the New Age movement is disingenuous at best, and to those who know better, it’s rather a joke.

I should add, since Cumbey has brought it up, that I find Ezra Pound’s poem “With Usura” to contain insight which today’s “Christians” should aspire to, but that’s hardly an endorsement of Pound’s Gnostic tendencies or affiliations; W. B. Yeats and the Golden Dawn, for instance.

I must say I don’t enjoy writing this response. I found Mrs. Cumbey’s book, The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow to be informative when it was first published in the early 80’s. I had no idea what direction Mrs. Cumbey’s research had taken since that book was published. Surely, she could be forgiven for not making the connection between the rainbow and the Noahide movement of Judaism (which predates Alice Bailey by millenia) 25 years ago when reliable information on the occult and Judaism was more difficult to come by. But that’s not so much the case today.

Since Mrs. Cumbey has written a response to my blog posting on the Noahide movement and it’s symbol, the rainbow, I must assume that she has read it, but in her response she has studiously ignored the content of that posting including the quotes from the Talmud, Mishneh Torah, the Encyclopaedia Judaica, a joint Rabbinic Council-Pontifical Commission document, U.S. laws and presidential proclamations, news articles and video clips cited, choosing instead to imply that it’s all just “anti-‘Jewish’ propaganda” and expressing concern that she may be associated with it. Fear not, Mrs. Cumbey. It’s clear to me now that you have no fellowship with the kind of research conducted here, and I wouldn’t think of associating your work with it.

I do hope that you will give the matter further consideration, however, lest the true hidden danger of the rainbow remain hidden to your readers.

P.S. I do realize that there are anti-“semitic” elements within occult movements, Mrs. Cumbey. Anti-“semitism” is a very important tool of the rabbis and Zionists. Consider this: is it likely that the world would have extended the Zionists a blank check to build a “Jewish” state called “Israel” on someone else’s land–to kill and drive off the land’s occupants–if the Nazi persecutions had not taken place beforehand? I highly doubt it. Many have called Hitler the true founding father of the “Jewish” state and as ironic as it may seem on the surface, I find no fault in that statement. This apparently ironic, but quite logical dialectic is clear to see in the thinking of one of the founders of modern Zionism, Theodore Herzl:

It is essential that the sufferings of Jews … become worse … this will assist in realization of our plans … I have an excellent idea … I shall induce anti-semites to liquidate Jewish wealth … The anti-semites will assist us thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and oppression of Jews. The anti-semites shall be our best friends. (Diaries of Theodore Herzl, Part I, p. 16)

Everything depends upon our propelling force. And what is our propelling force? The misery of the Jews. (Theodore Herzl, A Jewish State, p. 8)

Rabbi E. Schwartz further clarified:

“To achieve their goal of statehood the Zionists have always deliberately provoked anti-Semitism … Their interest was not to save Jews, on the contrary, more spilling of Jewish blood would strengthen their demand of the nations for the creation of their state.” (New York Times, May 18, 1993)

Whatever anti-“semitism” that exists in occult movements of the West, whether real or mocked, most often serves the purposes of the Zionist movement. The Nazi movement is the strongest case in point. Most Western occult movements (Masonry in particular, with it’s fixation on the rebuilding of Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem) are Zionist at the core.

And it is plain to see that occultists pair target groups off against each other, as you say. One only need observe how Skull and Bones member, George W. Bush and his Zionist handlers have pitted “Judeo-Christians” against Muslims in a misnamed “war on terror” which is in reality a war on Amalak, the eternal enemy of the rabbis, and a war for Israeli dominion in the Middle East.

I hope that you will consider your own point more deeply. As the traditions, cultures and religions of the world–mostly Christendom–are broken down, the tradition of Judaism is being simultaneously built up. As sovereign nations around the world are being slowly dissolved into large unions, a “Jewish” nation is simultaneously being unnaturally propped up at astronomical expense to outside sources from where the required resources are extracted. The Christian nations that are having their soveriegnty and religion robbed from them are forced to finance the building of a “Jewish” state. If the New Age movement is the true force behind the deChristianization of the West, the fruit of it’s labor certainly seems to benefit the “Jewish” state. How could this possibly take place if the “all-powerful” New Age movement were truly against it?

Anti-“Jewish” quotes from Alice Bailey are interesting at most to me, Mrs. Cumbey. I am a Christian, and Jesus Christ said that it’s by their fruits that you will know them, not by their rhetoric.