He didn't set the house on fire, I and a bunch of other people have been listening to the scanner. About 20 minutes before the fire was set the police said they were going to go ahead with the "burners" then. Then later they said they had set fire to #1 and #2 which were references to the sides of the house. They didn't set the back on fire.

EDIT: Since most people are seeing this first, here are the posts I made in regards to my comment: http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/18ef8e/christopher_dorner_in _gun_battle_with_authorities/c8e6d19?context=3

Here is also a timestamp of when it happened so if you get your hands on audio, you have an idea of what time to look for. This is in PST: http://i.imgur.com/y7fpSWk.png

The Dorner character seems to be a hero to a lot of FARK types. I wallow in the filth, anyway. Doesn't speak well of me, personally, but there you are.

You find people like Dorner to be a hero and you think you should criticize me. If he was such a hero to you why weren't you there shooting all the cops to get him out? Then I would be rid of you as well. If you thought the joke was just insensitive, fine I am insensitive. That is why I picked the handle and make those kind of jokes on Fark.

Dorner was nothing more than a nutjob who decided to shoot up his old workplace. Only he took more time and got some people to buy his crazy. Let us not forget, not one person mentioned in his manifesto was harmed directly. After he killed innocent bystanders his manifesto meant nothing but garbage. Absolutely nothing about the LAPD will change, proving Dorner will be declared just crazy later when this studied in law & enforcement classes.