Once I was a clever boy learning the arts of Oxford... is a quotation from the verses written by Bishop Richard Fleming (c.1385-1431) for his tomb in Lincoln Cathedral. Fleming, the founder of Lincoln College in Oxford, is the subject of my research for a D. Phil., and, like me, a son of the West Riding. I have remarked in the past that I have a deeply meaningful on-going relationship with a dead fifteenth century bishop... it was Fleming who, in effect, enabled me to come to Oxford and to learn its arts, and for that I am immensely grateful.

Visiting Oxford?

Allow me to be your guide... and discover the history of Oxford with an Oxford historian.

I offer a wide range of guided walks around the city and university. These can be a general introduction to the history and architecture or looking at specific themes and subjects.

I am a Catholic and a historian based in Oxford, where I am a member of Oriel College. My research, for a long delayed D.Phil., is a study of Richard Fleming, Bishop of Lincoln in the second decade of the fifteenth century. I also work as a freelance tutor in History and as an independent tour guide.
I was received into the Church in 2005 and am a Brother of the External Oratory of St Philip Neri at the Oxford Oratory.

Search This Blog

Saturday, 19 May 2012

The reign in Spain

The most notable absentees from the Monarchs' lunch at Windsor were the King and Queen of Spain, whose government interdicted their visit because of the continuing dispute over the sovereigny of Gibralter - the issue which prevented their attending the wedding of the Prince and Princess of Wales in 1981.

This year is proving something of an annus horribilis
for the King and Queen, who did not publically celebrate their Golden
wedding last Monday. The various rumours of scandal around members of
the Royal family as are recorded, in a rather negative way, in this report
in the supposedly conservative Daily Telegraph.

In
one sense this can be seen as a coming of age for the restored Spanish
monarchy - like the other reigning dynasties of Europe they have become
fair game for the bored and opinionated, for those with a fine nose for
scandal and the grinding of particular axes. Too often, far too often it
is the open season for sniping. Misjudgements there may have been, and
mistakes made, but monarchs are human - that is one of the strengths of
monarchy - it is not a machine.

In the last generation or so we
have seen the Swedish monarchy prounced terminally doomed from before
the present King's accession in 1973, the hostility to the present Queen
of the Netherlands' marriage in the 1960s, the allegations around her
father in 1976, and doubts as to the future at
the time of her accession in 1980.

Here in the United Kingdom
the problems of the mid
1990s were only too publically aired and discussed, and even in Denmark
Prince Henrik has been the centre of various storms as indicated here.

In
Luxembourg and Lichtenstein the constitional position of the monarch
has been under fire and in Belgium the very future of the country, and
hence the monarchy, questioned.

For the Spanish monarchy there is
the problem of the hiatus between 1931-75, even if the monarchy was
formally re-established in 1947. It has been argued that, despite the
hitherto enormous popularity of the King, Spain itself is not a
sufficently monarchist society. I do not know if that is true, but I
can see that there might be some cause for concern for the future there.
On the other hand this could be dismissed as the chattering classes at
it again - and how they can chatter on such matters.

So it is not
easy, and for the moment it is the Spanish
crown that is under the public scrutiny. The country has far more
serious problems with which to concern itself, and should in no way
belittle the extraordinary and fundamental achievements of the King and
Queen and the Prince of Asturias in providing the stable constitutional
framework that allows it as a nation to try to deal with the
consequences of the eurocrisis, and which has guided it since 1975.