Men Will Always Be Seen As Evil By Feminists

A simple apostate from modernity who takes pleasure in pointing out blatant leftist hypocrisy, mocking SJW nonsense and a little thought-criminality from time to time.

Debating feminists can be a trying affair. Their tendencies to use straw men fallacies, ad hominem attacks, emotionally-loaded but hollow rhetoric while constantly moving the goal posts is well known. As is, when all else fails, they settle for the tried and true muh-harrassment tactic. But more than just faulty reasoning—if you can even call it that—much of what feminists argue involves having their cake and eating it too. (And in most cases, this involves a very substantial amount of cake.)

In this article we’ll focus on one particular gaping hole in feminist “logic.” Aside from the radical feminists who explicitly hate men, most feminists deny the charge that they despise, hate or hold men in contempt. “It’s the patriarchy” or something like that. Men “aren’t naturally bad, it’s society and the environment” or “toxic masculinity” or whatever.

Aside by the interesting point that this is pretty close to an admission that they despise men, in general, as they are in the real world today, it would at least be a coherent position.

Coherency and feminists don’t go well together though. The not-so-radical feminists may say men are naturally good, but they then set up what is an effectively impossible criterion for men to actually be good. It is what I will call “The Feminist Tautology” for virtually all sets of male behavior fall within it. An individual man may be able to escape its condemnation if he flagellates himself and his gender enough. But the male sex is damned if they do and damned if they don’t. No matter what, they’re evil.

Men Doing Bad Proves Men Are Bad

Proof Men are Evil

We’ll start with the obvious. If men do something bad more so than women, this is proof that men are terrible. While painting with an awfully broad brush, it makes sense.

Even differences in aggression are less than previously thought when you take “relational aggression” (i.e. ostracizing, spreading secrets or lies, etc.) into account.

And contrary to the “there would be no war if women were in charge” crowd, a study from New York University “…analyzed 28 European queenly reigns from 1480 to 1913 and found a 27 percent increase in wars when a queen was in power.”

Still, while feminists torture the data with bogus advocacy research, the general thrust of their argument is correct; men do commit more crime and violence than women.

Men Doing Good Also Proves Men Are Bad

More Proof Men Are Evil

But once we turn to the other side of the equation, things start to get a little more, well, problematic. After all, shouldn’t male achievement be a credit to the male gender?

Apparently not. After all Larry Summers was forced out at Harvard for noting that the reason there are less female scientists may be because of factors other than discrimination. Why are more women going to college than men? Who cares! Why aren’t women equally represented in engineering and science? Sexism of course!

The discrepancy between male and female achievement in the upper echelons is actually far larger than most people think. Yes, in the past women were sometimes locked out of such opportunities. But the gap is still massive today when such barriers have been eliminated (and often reversed.)

Charles Murray did a historiometric study of the greatest figures in math, science, literature, art, technology, music and medicine from 800 B.C. to 1950 for his book Human Accomplishment and found that 97.8 percent of the greats were men. Murray also noted that men won 96 percent of the Nobel Prizes between 1900 and 1950 and 97 percent between 1951 and 2000 (apparently sexism increased over the last 50 years of the 20th century). Not a single woman had won the Nobel Prize in Economics until 2009 and none had won the Fields medal in Mathematics until 2014.

Among Fortune 500 companies, women are only 5.2% of CEOs and 17% of board members. Among Fortune 1000 companies, women are still only 5.4% of CEOs – and 8.1% of top earners.

Women won in record numbers in the 2014 midterm elections, but still only 20% of the Senate and 19% of the House are women. At the state level, only 24.2% of legislators are women – and only five women are governors.

Only 16% of directors, executive producers and producers, writers, cinematographers, and editors of top-growing domestic films are women – and only 28% of off-screen talent in broadcast television are women.

Women are only 30% of physicians, 13% of engineers, and 9% of management and 14% of senior management positions in IT.

This is a feminist site, so we know they must first bemoan that “Unfortunately, a lot of cultural conversations around women’s leadership don’t encompass solutions to these gaps.” And the reason for those gaps? Well, obviously “gender still holds women back at work.” The one-note song of male oppression is sung once again.

But let us consider this briefly in more detail. If we need a “solution to these gaps” it is implied that male and female achievement should be 50/50 or approximately that (despite having never been so at any time in history ever). Indeed, feminists say this kind of thing all the time so feminist theory infers that men’s and women’s achievement should move in tandem. Therefore male achievement and female achievement are not independent variables, but directly contingent on each other.

So let’s arbitrarily set male achievement at 100 and female achievement at 50. There are two ways to look at this. The first is that both should be 75. In that case, men are just hogging some of that sweet achievement for themselves, but not costing society anything.

Thus, we would expect that if achievement were brought into a supposedly natural equilibrium, male achievement would stay at 100 and female achievement would come up to 100.

What this means, weirdly enough, is that men are actually doing wrong when they do right.

The only feminist-approved way to be a “good man”

If this were true (spoilers: it’s not) male achievement is actually only 50. It would be 100 on its own, but because men can only do better than women by oppressing them, you have to subtract 50 off men’s 100. In other words, half of men’s achievement was simply taken away from women. Women’s, on the other hand, should be at 100 if you add the stolen 50 back.

So in the upside down world of feminists, women have actually been, or at least should have been, mostly responsible for the technological, scientific, artistic and medical achievements of humanity while men continue to be responsible for crime, poverty, environmental decay and war.

A feminist who was called out on this might concede it’s not completely contingent and it’s only supposed to be approximately 50/50. But the same logic would apply. Then men’s achievement is only approximately the cause of any shortfall in women’s achievement.

The end result is the same. When speaking about the gender on the whole, when men do bad, they are bad. When men do good, they are also bad because the only possible way men could do better at anything than women is because they discriminated against them.

Again, an individual man who consumes sufficient quantities of soy, subordinates himself and chastises his own gender enough may be considered tolerable by feminists and their ilk. But in the end, the male gender has been damned by feminists with the original sin of being evil no matter what. And unless you are under the belief that men and women are effectively the same and these differences can be completely abated (in which case, you’re stupid), then this original sin is also unfixable. There can be no salvation nor redemption. Men are evil. By definition, they have to be and there’s nothing that can ever change that.

When looking at the matter this way, men would be wise to ask themselves a simple question: What exactly is the point of trying to appease people with such views?

113 Responses

Let’s not forget women are (supposedly) a whopping 7.3 percent of auto mechanics (I’ve never seen one); 3.2% of loggers, 9% of construction, 13% of mining; and about 5% of airline pilots.

A female retired airline captain summarizes the reasons for this discrepancy quite well, and I think this applies to why there aren’t more women in all of these industries. Look what she says in paragraph 3; essentially, (flying) is unappealing to women especially because they may not have the “drive, ambition” as the number one and two reasons. “Financial” is BS because that applies to males as well; flying is simply expensive to learn to do properly.” Why is so much being spent to shoehorn women into careers that they don’t have the ambition or drive to do?

“Angela Masson, a retired American Airlines captain who heads the group, said it shouldn’t be very surprising that women don’t flock to a stressful male-dominated job that requires lots of expensive and continuous training, takes them away from home for large chunks of time and makes it difficult to raise a family.

“I suppose if the job were just concerned with flying, there would be a lot more women,” Masson said.

“But the job isn’t just flying, it’s wrapped up in a whole lot of other unappealing circumstances, unappealing especially to women who may not have the drive, ambition, financial means or the family/network support to pursue flying as a career.

“Flying has to be something that you really, really want, because even gender issues aside, it’s a very challenging and demanding career.”

“Let’s not forget women are (supposedly) a whopping 7.3 percent of auto mechanics (I’ve never seen one)”

I once stayed home sick from work at got to watching these reality TV shows about vintage car restoration. Every one had some girl who could barely turn a wrench and obviously didn’t actually work at the shop that the studio must have dropped in for eye candy.

The truck driver in ice roads, The Boring guy who does his job with no complication so it´s boring to watch, the dumb guy who do stupid things and the chick who is a the strong woman in the road who does everything better than men.

We had 22 people in our Air Traffic Control training course – 21 men and 1 women – spatial skills were the main entry qualification thus barely any women could get in – of course the one woman in the group dropped out after 2 months

I have witnessed some pretty impressive performances by controllers in high workload/heavy congestion scenarios and it has always been a man. The good ones have good foresight, use unique time saving techniques and they don’t get flustered when things get intense.

Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! :!ag82d:
On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
:!ag82d:
➽➽
➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash372ShopHub/Pay$97/Hour… ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!ag82l..,….

And the ones that make it have zero concept of predicting proper aircraft separation. They often have a male supervisor step in and correct them. I’ve lost a lot of opportunities to conduct simple visual approaches ahead of other aircraft because of their poor spatial skills. Think of time wasted for passengers and the airline’s fuel costs.

It also applies to aircraft maintenance. Depending on your field, you have to have lots of patience, attention to detail, and be able to follow checklists, which many women just can’t. They don’t have the patience and serenity to do so.

Queen Victoria had a reign that saw huge leaps in industry, compulsary education for ALL children, she and her husband both helped see an end to slavery and child labour and the beginnings of the Great Britain we see today.Not to mention all the lingering great works of art like The Royal Albert Hall and Crystal Palace. Her reign also saw the evolution of government into the form the UK has today.

Oh and there’s the small bit where she ruled a quarter of the world, and is the 2nd longest reigning monarch, only beaten by her Great Great Granddaughter, Queen Elizabeth II just last year.

Also want to add here, that her’s was a reign that saw a more modest and proper society, a far cry from the sexual, financial and political scandals that befell members of her family.

And what is her greatest accomplishment? Having been born into a royal family and having a father who died young, just like Elizabeth II.
If you credit the royal family for the historical improvements/accomplishments listed, you are deluded. She ruled a quarter of the world? Let me guess, she sent her armies of women out to sea to cultivate and trade in foreign lands. Yeah, female shipbuilders, warriors and sailors risked life and limb on the high seas bringing English goods, technology, culture, language and civilization to the world.

Being born into royalty is not the achievement, having one of the most prosperous reigns is. And when you consider the massive boom in industry the UK saw under Victoria – it is a testament to her, and her enthusiasm to progression, development and improving society that she shared alongside Albert that is the real achievement. Her reign molded the UK into the country that it is today.

These may be truths and at the risk of getting off topic, I am letting my disdain for the royal family cloud my views. However, what I would say to keep with spirit of the article, regarding your comment above, is this:
If society is so hell-bent on pushing women into traditional male roles and feminists are influencing women to avoid motherhood, nuturing and other “traditionally feminine” occupations, where would that lead us in the English speaking world?
Rhetorical question. It’s happening. With a birth rate of less than 2.0 births per women, the next generation in the Western world will live with the consequences of feminism. Allah willing.

Sane women may be humoring feminists to see what they can get out of their bitching and complaining. What they get out of it isn’t any more than the small number of important and lucrative positions they always had since they still don’t apply for them.

Besides, since all women’s main behavior is whining, complaining, bitching, and criticizing they feel feminists are alphas at being women.

It was through (not because of) woman that corruption entered man. It was not, nor is it to this day, woman who caused, or causes, man’s falling. Adam’s motives and desires were understood by the spirit in the Serpent, not by Eve. She was but an instrument. Through her, Satan tempted man, and in that moment Adam’s spiritual eyes were closed and his physical eyes opened, and he saw Eve as never before and instantly became imprinted with her female body.

Man, as sinner, was released through a woman. In his pride the first man listened to the flattering Tempter, and in that instant his soul’s eye was darkened; the pure, paradisiacal life faded, and with a changed perception he beheld woman as flesh as was imprinted by that view. His spiritual authority
vanished.

If the Tempter, the Dragon of Old, had incarnated into a donut instead of into Eve, Adam would have been imprinted by the donut instead of by woman. Believe it or not, he would have had overt sexual feelings, as well as submerged longings, for donuts. He would have felt that something missing could
be supplied by having sex with a donut. He would have been capable of being in love with a donut and loyal to a donut.

But the Tempter knew what he was doing when he chose woman to be his instrument. Reverse the order of faith, and woman, who responds to man, will instead cause man to respond to her and to her spirit. It is her nature to be entwined with man. That is why man must be her guide and protector.

And so, to this very day, as she supports her man in his selfish ego ambitions, she actually cooperates in his decline, even misconstruing it as a duty that she could do so. Of course, the more supportive she is, the more damage she does, however loving her intent. As she feeds man’s pride through her acceptance of him, he grows more and more afraid of opening his eyes to the truth—more and more dependent upon the distraction she provides.

Feminists will hate as long as you let them exist. All men need to collectively man up and say “bitch fuck feminism and suck my dick” I promise they will all get so wet that it will put niagara falls to shame. Thats all until then cope with frigid,opinonated, sexually frustrated women.

Modern women are pretty damned good at being irrational, shirking responsibility, creating disharmony, refusing to be held accountable, hurling shit tests, lying, riding the dick carousel, and taking selfies…we must give credit where credit is due here.

“I’m gonna go with my girlfriends and protest the gender gap and those dirty sexist pigs who objectify us and want to rape us! But first, let me take a selfie! And make sure my boobs show so it looks like totally hot!”

…and these (un-feminine & ungrateful) females forget the fact that MEN created almost everything they use in their daily lives; Ass wipes, Toilet, Tampon, Mammography, Gynecology, ………… etc. etc. etc., including the Sewing Machines and SmartPhones !!

I like to reverse it on them: If the wage gap accounts for all choices women make, it’s narrowed from 77 cents on a dollar down to merely 6 cents. For the sake of argument, let’s assume that 6 cents is all due to sexism against women.

That means that 17 remaining cents is due to women’s SEXIST choices and demands for men and society to support them. Feminists will then claim that there are “nice” feminists out to do something about the sexism of women, the courts and chivalrous society but that leaves us with two generalizations:

1) Nearly all feminists are sexists projecting their chivalrous entitlements onto a patriarchy and…
2) Nearly all men and patriarchs are protectors of women (see number 1)

Meaning therefore that feminism is moot and merely the paradigm of a spoiled girl rebelling against daddy for being too generous with her.

Arguing rationally with feminists doesn’t make a lot of sense (they are acting upon emotional drivers rather than rational ones) so hit ‘em where they hurt: Point out that they will get lesser attractive and competitive men than anti-feminists. It’s “selling out” but they secretly think the whole agenda is about getting more goodies so by showing their agenda is actually self-destructive to that end, they will quickly stomp their feet and leave and perhaps change.

I’ve come to this conclusion about the entire “left.” In their mind, if you’re not absolutely with them, you’re with their enemies (so much for ‘tolerance’ and ‘shades of gray’). All Conservatives, even those who spend all their time punching right and defending left, are enemies by virtue of not being 100% pure. All white people, even “allies”, are enemies because “white privilege” is inherent to their skin. All people of normal sexuality, no matter how many gay friends or how much they support the cause du jour, are enemies by virtue of not being part of the particular in-group.

Part of Red Pill Truth is understanding there is no vaunted “melting pot” of virtuous diversity in the United States or Europe…only a forced “mosaic” upon which everyone is left defending their respective ethical/religious/gender/etc. “tiles” from encroachment. People simply to not freely blend…anyone who thinks otherwise, IMO, has been fooled by the Media.

A new wave of feminism has arrived. It is the gun toting, badass “conservative” chick who doesn’t like muslims, thinks short haired bitter feminists are gross and, well you get the idea. As long as women remain on the pedestal, we will always be in trouble. These so called “conservative” girls still expect to be worshipped, they will continue whoring for attention and they will remain a distraction, cause problems, collect child support and alimony, create drama and problems in the work place, they will be selected for a job because they have a vagina and they will seduce men into making poor decisions. It’s the fault of men for continuing to allow this. Some of us saw this coming from a mile away. We’ve heard our friends say, “no way dude, this chick is cool, she’s not a feminist, she supports Trump, likes to shoot guns and..” Up on the pedestal she goes and a new virtue signal has taken shape. This is the new program: (shaming men is bad but chicks are still super awesome and a lot better). This is not what we want. Women should be submissive, end of story. Next time a chick sends you a photo of her at the range, hair in a ponytail holding an AR-15 say, “that’s nice, what are you making for lunch?” Women have strong survival instincts and they are very competitive with one another and they secretly hate each other. This is a developing strategy for survival, remaining in power and remaining on the pedestal.

This “men will remain evil” propaganda serves a few purposes; it is an insurance policy to train society to act as attack dogs against anyone who shows the slightest amount of resistance allowing women to rise to power. This program still has a lot of white knight support but I think it is slowly being displaced by the newly developing badass conservative chick who likes guns but doesn’t openly hate men program. The new program currently gaining support from the pussy worshipping, virtue signaling so called “conservative” white knights who are in the process of being fooled by a new brand of feminism.

The idea of equality is and always will be a joke. Someone will put on the pants and the other will submit, walk on egg shells and do their very best not to upset their master.

You know, this has been my train of thought for a while. This is why I dismiss Southern Bible Belt conservatives as hypocrites. They expect others to behave in a Godly way, yet let their women act like feral animals. Don’t believe me, go to your nearest trailer park. And this was before the mudshark phenomenon got steam.

Exactly, the chicks still wear the pants. The only difference is; it’s more aesthetically appealing and charming than the the bitter short haired dike feminist. This is nothing more than bargaining for power.

This new brand of feminism is really hot right now because the cucks love it too. The cuck can submit with greater ease and speed. Its a low hanging fruit in terms of virtue signaling. There’s less confusion for the cuck to decide wether or not to be an agreeable lap dog.

The so called “conservative” right winger likes this new brand because it has the appearance of a solved problem or a brighter future.

Not only the chicks wear the pants, but often, they choose not to wear pants cause they’re chicks with bad attitudes. An example is that American tradition better known as the bikini car wash. It’s amazing how in the supposedly more conservative areas, this is common. I noticed this while living in Tucson and the most surprising thing is, most of these are carried out by teenage girls raising money for cheerleader or gymnastics clubs. For one, damned if you do get your car washed by these toots, as this is not only degrading to women because it sexualizes them, but because they’re underage, ergo, you’re a pedophile. And then I also wonder, where are the fathers? Why are they allowing this? Either moms have them whipped to submission, or maybe it’s the whole redneck incest stereotype and seeing their own daughters in bikinis getting soapy suds all over their tight bodies gets them off.

And on the subject, there was a TV spot for a local boot store catering mainly to whites. In it there was your stereotype white hat wearing boot wearing with shorts woman saying “I like a man with good manners.” And the there’s the stereotype white dude who looks like a country singer saying “I like a woman with a bad attitude.” And that sums it up. I’m just saying. Instead of going out and marching with tiki torches like wannabe SA troopers like they did yesterday, maybe white men should stay home and control their women. Either that, or Chad, Sancho, Ahmed, and Tyrone will do that for them. Just saying.

I spoke with a friend of mine recently. The guy is a player, no problems bangin hot chicks. He said to me, “man I’m getting tired of these little hoe bags, I need to go down to Tennessee or something and find me a good country girl.” Me: “dude… don’t fall into that trap, you still need to keep that woman in check.”

I am somewhat of a redneck since birth, partaking in redneck activities. There’s a lot to enjoy, to be proud of and a lot of fun to be had. But in the end, what do we have in the southern US? Feminism with a twist. Still gotta keep these chicks in line.

A few years ago, I was working in the south. My boss was a hard working country boy. We worked hard and we had a lot of fun. I mean a LOT of fun (shooting guns, ATV’s, motorcycles, fishing etc). He told me a little bit about his teenage daughter. One day, daughter shows up with her brand new sports car that daddy had bought her, trashed with all kinds of shit all over it; eggs, silly string, shaving cream. I think it was senior skip day. She walked up, handed him the keys and ordered him to clean it up and trade cars. My jaw hit the ground. I looked at another guy I worked with and said, “did you see that?” Him “mmhmm.”

True. But they are deliberately & desperately being highlighted in day to day lives; Email/News websites, Banking, Advertising, TV Shows, Low-budget “worthless” movies, Entertainment, Government Offices etc. etc.
I (just like majority of ROKers) stopped watching TV & Movies loooooong back. That said, it is becoming difficult to “bear and keep cool” with other things !! For example, I stopped accessing my Discover account with Discover.com; instead I use DiscoverBank.com !!!

Staying one step ahead with this astute x-ray vision. I’ve had the same hunch but had yet to put words to it…you did and saved me the energy. This is one of the reasons I come to RoK (having my parallel thoughts made more concrete by those who think alike and know how to write about it).

We’ve seen it said here before — women acting mannish just to “prove a point” reveal themselves as exactly what they are portraying themselves to be: Inferior Men. Not sexy, and not convincing. Law of Nature prevails through all forms of posturing and rhetoric, ALWAYS.

Funny you say that because I had a similar experience. There was an ROK article a few months ago where we talked about this. I made a comment and another guy showed up and said it better than me. The crowd was divided on this one and A significant amount of ROK regulars disagreed. I venture to say probably because this new breed of feminist in disguise seemed to be a breath of fresh air. The guys have high hopes for this one. Let’s get real. Guys are going to hoist these chicks high up on the pedestal. It’s gonna be a tough pill to swallow when these guys find themselves getting frivorce raped, no changes, business as usual.

The obvious question that no one asks is, if women are so badass and smart like feminists say they are, then how did billions of Amazonian poet-warrior princesses allow themselves to be held down by stupid baboon men for tens of thousands of years?

or the converse.. How do women say they are tough and fierce yet are “triggered” by words and need safe spaces?? Women in combat or the special forces yet microaggressions ruin their day.. The female mind is unknowable

When western women convinced the western world that there were no
differences between the sexes, logic was demoted to the back of the
line, and culture was signaled that we would no longer be guided by fact
based reasoning, but by the whims of every hysterical political
movement that was to follow.﻿You can have reason guiding your culture or you can have women, you can not have both.

Not sure what episode you watched, but the fact that it was Webby that was the intellectual leader-type, the badass assassin was a female, and Uncle Scrooge was submissive to his female housekeeper, all screamed that Disney had followed it’s SJW talking points almost to the letter. I imagine within 3-5 episodes they’ll make Launchpad gay.

Badass assassin was easily defeated by a kid ( Flintheart wasn’t joking, when he said, that he hired the cheapest). Webby wasn’t the leader type, she spent most of her life sheltered by her grandma. She just wanted to make some friends, but she didn’t know how. And how was Scrooge submissive to Mrs. Beakley?

Webby was the leader being the one to instruct the boys then the whole group, in fact that part they’re playing ad nauseum in the commercials. She was the organized thinker who came up with how to stop the dragon. Not too mention she was presented as the innocent that had to be taught to lie by the boys.
Scrooge was scolded into submission and had to await ms Beasley’s permission to take the child out on further adventures.
Furthermore they had donald not only play his regular bad tempered, incompetent self, but additionally the effeminate overprotective one to boot. Not only that, but if you look to the painting that the boys looked at in the middle and the end, it showed the most dashing person in the picture to be the female duck, so you know they’re going to play up the whole go-grrl angle that she was the true badass of the old group and they’ve laid the foundation that her loss will be attributed to the short-sighted mistake of scrooge, hence the argument that was cut off in the room flood.
The fact is I want to like this series, but I won’t turn a blind eye to SJW themes that Disney is flooding into its outlets. They just happen to be using a vehicle with nostalgia like they did with the poor update to Boy Meets World, that slowly dragged to death.

We have are three types of men. First is the Moses-Jesus type personality (rare) and second you have the fallen masses and on the other side leading downward is the Pharaoh-Hitler type. The average man stands between the worlds offered by their leaders and their respective leaders have a special kind of consciousness with which to lead their own and each mystically recognizes the authority of this guide.

The three human types descended from an original higher form of man. Starting at the top there is
the Jesus-type man which you do not see on earth. Secondly there is the fallen but natural Adamic
type, naive, gentle and easily led; and lastly there is the dangerous, sub-Adamic, subhuman man
who is fashioned out of another falling away from the natural state of the Adamic man. The sub-
Adamic person with super prideful, subhuman inclinations enjoys what his fiendish leader leads
him to become.

Where evil has power and where might rules, might is also the right. To become more evil means to have more power in the system. More power is more “righteousness”, and this fact holds true until the Adamic men (potential children of Light) awaken through their collective sufferings at the hands of the children of darkness to seek the Truth that sets them free. Evil has no power except the power we are unconsciously compelled to give it and as long as we live in ignorance of the Truth, we shall suffer from evil with the power we give it to inflict those mortal wounds upon us.

The Adamic men must find the same state of consciousness that the ruling class of subhumans now have in reverse.

So let’s keep the NFL Win Train rolling along tonight, and continue our hot streak, by betting on the Los Angeles Chargers -1 point, against the Seattle Seahawks – unless things change between now and the 8:00 p.m. EST kickoff time, in which case, I will let you know right here in the comments section.

If I don’t revise that play by the time 7:30 p.m. EST rolls around, just let it rip. I’m plunking $200 down on this one (plus 10% for the juice, a total of $220).

If you should decide to follow my lead, good luck to you, and I’ll see you at the cashier’s window when we collect our loot – or, if by some horrid quirk of fate we should lose, I’ll give you a couple of swigs off my bottle of Wild Irish Rose, behind the Lucky Thong, and I’ll share my pack of Kools with you as well. So it’s a win/win either way, and we’ll definitely have a hell of a lot of fun no matter what happens. Caveat emptor. Seize the day. Never look a gift horse in the mouth. Over and out.

While I can appreciate your largely accurate statement,, it is primarily white, American, Christian, middle class, men who stand in the way of the New World Order / Leftist agenda, and it is they who are likewise viewed as the cause of all problems. The majority of blacks, Latinos and Asians, support Leftist causes and tyrannical governments.

Sorry Bro, you got it wrong ! If your houghts are confined to only West, then maybe; you are right. In reality, majority of females on planet Earth are femicunts and they see MEN (color, race and religion doesn’t matter !!) as evil and they will always be Shameless, Opportunistic, Cunning, Whorish, Slutty, Bitchy, Arrogant and Ungrateful.

Yes, my thoughts are confined to the USA, as certain of the men here are the only thing standing in the way of the New World Order / Leftist agenda. When America goes down, the whole world is ripe to go down, and there are no more knights in shining armor, world wide, to stop any evil tyrants.

I partly agree but again, if U.S goes down (if..at..all), then the whole world “might” go down in the aspects of Economy, Commerce etc. When it comes to the “knights in shining armor”, trust me, there are equal number (if not more) of them in Asia, especially in Hindustan.
There, Patriarchy is in the Blood of MEN. It’s only because of influence of the “West and vested interests” (don’t want to get into those details !) and the femicuntisim; MEN are being forced into behaving as “betas” !!
We do have pussy maniacs, but still they don’t “pedestal” them. We do have betas, but still they don’t allow them to be “entitled”. But hey; the dirty Politics, Treachery, Businesses always wants to “pamper” the weak and pathetic; the pussies.

PS: I long back stopped calling/addressing the U.S with the “full” name, and will do the same until Femicuntism is nailed down. I have lot of hopes on the President, Mr. Trump.

No, the whole world DOES go down and in every way, leading to massive tyranny, abuse, oppression, murder, torture, invasions, and in unprecedented levels. You have not thought this through.

Who in Asia? Do they have a military? Do they have massvie military equipment? Can they fight wars against the largest oppressors on the globe? Asia is not coming to anyone’s rescue. Hindustan is not coming to anyone’s rescue. Asians, in general, are some of the most oppressive people in the history of the world.

Who gives a kick-fuck what feminists think? Trying to understand the thought processes of crazy people is a pointless and thankless undertaking. Refuse to acknowledge their humanity. Ignore them. DO NOT fuck them under any circumstances. Make them all be miserable cunt-eating dykes. Condemn them to eating ice cream in bed with their cats.

I missed the part where I was supposed to give a fuck about what women thought. I already couldn’t give a shit what feminists, poofs, Leftists, Muslims and other subhumans think so they’re just another entry on my list of those whose opinion is as meaningful as the smallest of my farts.

I’m not sure why anyone wants to be seen as “good” in the eyes of the feminists, or any of the other subclasses of SJWs. I’ve embraced the role of villain, and it is completely freeing. Since as a white cisgendered(I wonder how many more evil titles I’ll have to add eventually), male I’m automatically damn for anything I do or don’t do. Ergo I have no morality to be held to because of representing some victim class to whine about. Therefore if I choose to do good or ill, it is solely from my own choosing and the responsibility is completely my own. In the old days this was called being an adult!

In Australia it’s about 50/50 these days where women are never prosecuted and men go straight to jail. If the police comes to a domestic violence case in a home, the man is forcefully removed from “his home” even if the woman is the only 1 being violent! The government keeps running hate campaigns against men ‘stop violence against women’ but never ‘stop violence against everyone.’

Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! :!ag82d:
On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
:!ag82d:
➽➽
➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash372ShopHub/Pay$97/Hour… ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!ag82l..,…..

What are the stats on stay at home moms who chose NOT to work? Heck, for that matter, what are the stats on stay at home housewives. Man (husband)chooses not to work, he’s a bum. A women (wife) chooses not to work, she’s made a choice.

“He disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones. It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy.” -George Orwell, 1984

Funny, I made that pentagram/male symbol image like 7 or 8 years ago. Ahh the old EP days

0

0

Top 5 Most Popular Posts

ROK Donation Drive

If you’re getting value from ROK, consider making a donation through the Roosh Booster Club to help us publish better articles and compensate our writers. Your donation is crucial in the face of Silicon Valley’s cockblocking campaign against us. Click here to learn full details.

Flagship ROK Shirt Has Landed

After many months of delay, we have launched Red Kings Shop to provide you with ROK apparel that will Kratomize your testosterone levels, massively increase the size of your penis, and make you the most beloved shitlord in your city. Click here for launch details.