The new US concept of a “perfect” mission: 32 out of 103The Saker | Apr 14, 2018
Click here

[snip]

Yup, he said “mission accomplished“, “perfectly executed” and that he was “so proud” of his “great military“.

• That considering that 71 out of 103 missiles were intercepted.
• That there were no Syrian (or Iranian or Russian) fatalities.
• That not a single airfield was hit.
• That the buildings destroyed were empty.
• That only Syrian air defense were used.

• That Russian air defenses were completely bypassed.

This guy:

Called the strikes “Precise, overwhelming and effective” (does he also look like an alcoholic to you?)

Finally, and this is weird, there is no evidence of the French doing anything at all (go figure?). Oh, speaking of the French, it appears that they warned the Russians about what would happen. So, technically speaking, the US generals are being truthful when they say that they did not warn the Russian but just “deconflict”. The French did all the warning for them.

As for that pathetic scorecard, the Pentagon “spokesperson” said that they had noticed a 2000% increase of “Russian troll” activity over the past 24 hours.

No kidding!

I would think that completely destroying a non-existing Syria chemical warfare capability could even be called a “infinite success”.

Let’s wait for further details (a lot of pro-Syrian outlets did exaggerate the number of missiles shot down) but it appears that the AngloZionist went for the “least bad” option in terms of risk for our planet: a symbolic and completely useless “pretend strike”. And for that I am personally grateful.