This Wiki page is edited by participants of the Cognitive and Learning Disabilities Accessibility Task Force. It does not necessarily represent consensus and it may have incorrect information or information that is not supported by other Task Force participants, WAI, or W3C. It may also have some very useful information.

1st June 2nd Working Draft of the gap analysis and 1st Working Draft of roadmap

1st December Editors draft of the glossary

Citations

Materials published by this task force have a lot of citations. W3C has a particular format and tooling for those. While there is a central database of specifications and other publications, most of the citations used by this group are not in that central database. Therefore the task force maintains a separate database of citations. See instructions for creating and using citations.

Key links

Upcoming Work

Key Resolutions

Term needed for "recommendations" in roadmap as "recommendations" is a reserved word in the W3C. (Suggestion: Proposals and/or Principles)

Helping users improving skills is out of scope but useful for outreach

we will use the term 'intellectual disabilities' rather than just use terms such as Down Syndrome or other specific types of intellectual disability

We are avoiding the phrase ICT with other, Web related terms intellectual disability such as Down Syndrome.

We are using the term intellectual disability rather then specific type of

We can resolve small issues on the calls. Larger resolutions need to be approved on our list. We expect people to bring up opposition to resolution within 48 hours.

Criteria by which we decide what research to accept:Due to practical constraints most research will simply be cited and not examined for credibility. However the following cases will rely on task force consensuses before inclusion:

Commercial research that implies the use of a specific proprietary product will be examined for scientific credibility before being included

Research where the task force is aware of contradictory evidence (including anecdotal) will be examined for scientific credibility before being included.