Bush Given Authority To Sexually Torture American Children The "horror of the shrieking boys" gets a rubber stamp from the boot-licking U.S. Congress & Senate as America officially becomes a dictatorship

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com

September 29, 2006

Slamming the final nail in the coffin
of everything America used to stand for, the boot-licking U.S. Senate
last night gave President Bush the legal authority to abduct and sexually
mutilate American citizens and American children in the name of the
war on terror.

There is nothing in the "detainee"
legislation that protects American citizens from being kidnapped by
their own government and tortured.

Yale
Law Professor Bruce Ackerman states in the L.A. Times,
"The compromise legislation....authorizes the president to seize
American citizens as enemy combatants, even if they have never left
the United States. And once thrown into military prison, they cannot
expect a trial by their peers or any other of the normal protections
of the Bill of Rights."

Similarly,
law Professor Marty Lederman explains: "this [subsection
(ii) of the definition of 'unlawful enemy combatant'] means that if
the Pentagon says you're an unlawful enemy combatant -- using whatever
criteria they wish -- then as far as Congress, and U.S. law, is concerned,
you are one, whether or not you have had any connection to 'hostilities'
at all."

We have established that the bill
allows the President to define American citizens as enemy combatants.
Now let's take it one step further.

Before this article is dismissed as
another extremist hyperbolic rant, please take a few minutes out of
your day to check for yourself the claim that Bush now has not only
the legal authority but the active blessings of his own advisors to
torture American children.

The backdrop of the Bush administration's
push to obliterate the Geneva Conventions was encapsulated by
John "torture" Yoo, professor of law at Berkeley, co-author
of the PATRIOT Act, author of torture memos and White House advisor.

During a December 1st debate in Chicago with Notre
Dame professor and international human rights scholar Doug Cassel, John
Yoo gave the green light for the scope of torture to legally include
sexual torture of infants.

Cassel: If the president deems that he’s
got to torture somebody, including by crushing the testicles of the
person’s child, there is no law that can stop him?

Yoo: No treaty.

Cassel: Also no law by Congress — that
is what you wrote in the August 2002 memo…

Yoo: I think it depends on why the President
thinks he needs to do that.

So if the President thinks he needs to order children's
penises to be put in vices, there is no law that can stop him and after
last night's vote, the Senate and Congress, exemplified by sicko
16-year-old boy groomer Mark Foley (R-FL), has graciously
provided Bush its full support for kids around the world to be molested
in the name of stopping terror.

Yoo's comments were made before
the passage of the torture legislation last night. Up until that point
Bush had merely cited his role as dictator-in-chief as carte-blanche
excuse for ordering torture - now his regime have the audacity to openly
put it in writing - going one step further than even the Nazis did.

Again, for those who are still deluded into
thinking the extent of the "pressure" is loud music and cold
water being thrown over Johnny Jihad in Ragheadistan, consider for a
moment the fact that your own Congress and President who, according
to the Constitution, are mandated to serve you, have just legalized
abducting your kids from your home and electric shocking their genitals.

Now that the criminals have declared themselves
outside of the law does that mean we'll see Bush barbecuing babies on
the White House lawn? Of course not, but the policy of torturing children
in front of their parents has already been signed off on by the Pentagon
and enacted under the Copper Green program and it
happened at Abu Ghraib.

Women who were arrested with their children were
forced to watch their boys being sodomized with chemical glow sticks
as the cameras rolled. Investigative journalist Seymour
Hersh says that the U.S. government is still withholding the tapes
because of the horror of the "soundtrack of the shrieking boys"
and their mothers begging to be killed in favor of seeing their children
raped and tortured.

Your government has just lobbied for and Congress
has passed legislation to discard the Geneva Conventions and mandate
all this.

Pedophiles nationwide should rejoice - they can
comfortably take a stroll down to the local swimming pool, grab whoever
they like, drag them home, rape and torture them, and then in their
defense cite the U.S. government as an example of how one should conduct
themselves.

Could that possibly be because they are knowingly
committing war crimes?

The legislating of torture itself should be a criminal
act. All laws that contradict the U.S. Constitution are null and void.
It was once a law that black people were slaves.

Only by engaging in civil disobedience and refusing
to tolerate or acknowledge the laws of a criminal regime that has greased
the skids for sexually torturing kids can we ever have a hope of returning
America to its past glory.

Uruknet receives daily many hacking attempts. To prevent this, we have 10 websites on 6 servers in different places.
So, if the website is slow or it does not answer, you can recall one of the other web sites: www.uruknet.info www.uruknet.de www.uruknet.biz www.uruknet.org.uk www.uruknet.com www.uruknet.org - www.uruknet.it www.uruknet.eu www.uruknet.net www.uruknet.web.at.it

:: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more info go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own
that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
:: We always mention the author and link the original site and page of every article.