Why We Can’t Judge Whether or not Someone Possesses Eternal Life

We at ExP are sometimes accused of condemning to hell people that don’t agree with our Biblical view of the gospel. We would like to state, unequivocally, that we cannot, and therefore do not, judge whether someone is or is not a believer.

We cannot condemn anyone, nor do we wish to see anyone condemned. The Bible is very clear on why anyone would be condemned, or not condemned:

John 3:18: He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

When we hear someone introduce works into the salvation equation, it would be negligent for us to ASSUME they were saved. If someone is not currently clear on God’s plan of salvation, it is at least possible that they were never clear on God’s plan of salvation.

What if someone currently claims to be an atheist? Can we know that such a person has never believed in Jesus as his Savior? No. According to scripture, someone who is believer can fall away:

Luke 8:13: They on the rock are they, which, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no root, which for a while believe, and in time of temptation fall away.

The Bible teaches that anyone who has ever believed in Jesus as Savior is eternally secure. So, even a professing atheist COULD be a heaven-bound believer, if he ever trusted in Jesus as his Savior. Having said that, would it be wise to assume that a professing atheist is a believer? We don’t think so. We think it would be best to tell such a person the gospel message.

What if someone is a professing Christian, is an active churchgoer, prays regularly, reads his Bible, tries to live a clean lifestyle, and does good works, but contradicts his profession of faith in Christ with statements that indicate that he thinks works are necessary in order for someone to get to heaven? His contradictory statements could include that one must “repent of sins” or “commit one’s life to Christ” in order to be saved, or that one must have a change in behavior and/or good works if he really is saved. He might even think that he could lose or forfeit his salvation. In such cases, would it be wise to assume he has ever trusted in Christ alone as Savior? Just like with the atheist, we think it would be be best to tell such a person the gospel message.

In the case of the professing atheist, his confession is “I don’t believe in God.” In the case of the professing Lordship “salvationist”, his confession will most likely be “I believe salvation is by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone”, but then he will contradict that statement by adding works to the equation. So, in reality, neither the atheist nor the Lordship “salvationist” is testifying to believing the gospel NOW.

We should approach each person with the assumption that he may not have heard or believed the gospel, unless he can clearly articulate why he is going to heaven, and it is based solely on the finished work of Jesus Christ. This is not because we want to be judgmental or condemning, but because God wants all men to be saved, and so should we.

I agree with the article. On Northland Bible Baptist and Quentin Rd podcasts -they give the gospel message every week. This is important especially today when people wander from church to church and may have never heard the Truth laid out in simple terms.

Yes, we firmly believe that the wonderful Gospel of God’s Grace should be clearly stated and explained at EVERY church service.. and the folks to be invited to put their faith in Jesus Christ alone as their Savior.. right where they are. No need for standing, walking the aisle, no “come to the altar”, no weeping/wailing, etc are…. Just believe in Jesus.

I have to comment on your statement of the lordship Salvationist his confession will most likely be “I believe salvation is by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone”, but then he will contradict that statement by adding works to the equation. I just had this exact discussion with an influential member of the church I had left.He said he believes this and so does anyone that had been there a while.So I mentioned some things that were said that contradict that and he said I should bring them up.Well I said I have had two meetings with the pastor already and didn’t want to be a thorn in his side any longer.I had also told the pastor well over a year ago that the website in the what we believe under regeneration was wrong in my opinion. This is exactly what it states under regeneration

We believe that all men are sinners by nature and by choice and are, therefore, under condemnation. We believe that those who repent of their sins and trust in Jesus Christ as Saviour are regenerated by the Holy Spirit. John 3:3; John 1:12; Romans 5:1-5.
I feel this make salvation a two step process and not by faith alone.Anyway theirs a lot more to say than this about that conversation but I will end it here.

I have remarked recently that we might be pretty sure, based on someone’s CLEAR statement, that they are saved, yet we cannot really know for sure that anyone is lost – regardless of their present message – because we do not know all that they heard and believed in the past. So we share the gospel, clearly and simply, and rejoice when folks believe in the Savior.

We appreciate your comment — the ultimate answer is an understanding of and believing the Gospel:
Romans 1:16
“For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for IT is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.”

So we preach the Gospel, instant in season and out…

I am happy that you are associated with the REAL Florida Bible College of Tampa with Yankee Arnold. Give him our thanks for standing strong for salvation by Grace through Faith in Jesus Christ alone!!

I think along that reasoning, if that person believes in saved by grace through faith, why do they profess otherwise. And when I bring up the topic with them, they get upset. I’m referring to preachers. So your article makes sense. It seems people want to believe in works so they can think they are more righteous.

Always assume someone needs the gospel… always give the gospel… then it is up to the individual. If nothing else, it reinforces the doctrine. For some, they are confused because someone convinced them, “You gotta do your part”. BUT, God in His GRACE, honored that moment in time when they placed their faith in Jesus as the satisfactory payment for their sin. They were born into the family of God and even though the destroyer has them confused, they are Heaven Bound… because of His Grace.

So very difficult, problably the most difficult thing in the world: faith. I have been struggling with faith in Jesus Christ my whole life. First starting out in fear, then into legalism, then into good works for incentive, then for egoic and self esteem needs, then universalism, then christian -buddhist syncretism ,then indifference, then anger, then atheism and a mental breakdown and the realization that the work of Jesus Christ is done. Still so many strongholds on me but I am fighting for the most free gift in the universe, to accept forgiveness and Jesus unconditional love for me.

You said: “..and the realization that the work of Jesus Christ is done.”

My comment: Trusting Christ’s finished work on one’s behalf is what faith is all about. I have prayed that you will grow in the knowledge of grace. I would recommend focusing on Christ and not on yourself or anything else when you struggle with doubts.

We are happy you have come to the point of understanding God’s Grace. No need to be “fighting” because once you understand Grace you can relax in God’s PROMISE of Eternal Life in Jesus Christ alone:

1 John 2:25
“And this is the promise that he (God) hath promised us, even eternal life.”
John 10:28
“And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.”

Those whose faith is in Jesus Christ alone for their salvation are sealed for all eternity by His Holy Spirit — never to change.

Ephesians 1:13
“In whom (Jesus) ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,”

Martin not sure when the last time you read the Gospel of John, if it has been awhile i would read it again. and remember it states over 90 times Belief gives a person eternal life that can not be lost.

John 5:24 “Most assuredly, I say to you, he who hears My word and believes in Him who sent Me has everlasting life, and shall not come into judgment, but has passed from death into life.”

Just wondering if someone would shed some light for me, if I am correct in assessing that the Pentecostal and charsmatic movmt is false because they have an arminian theology, which says u can lose yr salvation. So does that mean most of them are not saved and some r in spite of their movement. As I don’t believe tongues are for today. Was listening to John Macarthurs review of his strange fire conference and he said there is a revival with Reformed Theology, not surprising. That if we were not Reformed we were irrelvant I guess that makes me irrelevant.
He has upset the conservative charasmatics that the whole movement is demonic filled with mysticism, liberalism, psychology and so on. They r accusing him of broad brushing all charsmatics into one lot when they are not. Aren’t all the pentecostals false in their theology, doctrine and eschatology. Trying to research the pentecostal movement again as i am surrounded by them. They hardly ever admit to losing their salvation, but in the same breathe they say, if u apostasise or recant or become an atheist, that you were never saved. I think calvanism has crept in and they are always looking for evidence of their salvation.

Mary, there are likely some who have trusted Christ among the Pentecostal and Charismatics, just as there are among Lordship Salvationists. I think the members of any church that teaches a false (or fuzzy) gospel fit into a few broad categories, as follows:

1. Unbelievers
2. Believers who have become bewitched by a false gospel
3. Believers who are clear on the gospel, but haven’t had the courage or wisdom to separate

I think that Charismatics and Lordship “salvationists” actually share a lot in common – neither are willing to base their assurance of salvation on God’s word. In the case of Charismatics, they look for manifestations of the Holy Spirit (tongues, etc.) to make them “feel saved”. In the case of Lordship “salvationists”, they look for changed behavior and works to make them “feel saved.”

That’s a good definition of churches John. I believe you could maybe add for one more group type, believers who are in the middle of two and three. They never believed in works or got bewitched, but they don’t quite clearly see the problem with those who have, they are peacekeepers (not peacemakers) who don’t want to be involved. I don’t know if I explained it well enough, but I continue to be amazed by those even in ministry who preach a clear gospel but call hyper-Calvinist teachers their brethren.

I see more and more teachers who were thought of as being sound, compromising by their associates. We were trying to decide tonight if hirelings were also the wolves or just these careless teachers or preachers who allow error to creep in, and in doing so allow the wolves to get at the sheep.

Holly, I think of hirelings as the careless teachers or preachers who don’t protect their flocks from the wolves. I guess it’s hard to tell when the teachers or preachers are also wolves. In the second case, the wolves probably try to protect their flocks (or wolf packs) from the sheep. That is why I we would find ourselves so unwelcome in many “churches.”

John, that is very good insight. The wolves keeping the sheep from their flocks, whatever they may be. I am thoroughly dismayed at the amount of teachers who compromise the truth. It is not their truth to compromise, don’t they tremble or respect His Word at all? (Is 66:2)

I wonder how they excuse their associations, they play fast and loose with doctrine and they introduce these wolves under the guise of just quoting the ‘good part’ the wolf said, and never a warning, “this guy is a wolf”.

One recently I spoke to, asking him why he would quote Augustine or Saint Anselm, and basically he didn’t see anything wrong with quoting it in a ‘casual setting’, (something to that effect).

What about the new disciple that has no idea what he is being introduced to is tainted? And they run after the teachings of the wolf their teacher they trust has quoted? Because after all, they want to learn and draw near to God.

It is frustrating, and many times I have been told by pastors, that I am not to speak, one told me in a Facebook setting that I was to ‘keep my mouth shut’. I did tell him since I did not accept his authority, I’d have to decline. Another after a long discussion about Rick Warren’s false teachings didn’t go his way, told me he refused to talk to me any longer until I went and got my husband…. :) I told him I was a widow, and the Lord was basically in that position now, so to feel free to talk to him and get back with me :)

I’m not always patient, learning though…. He said he is going to make a “case study regarding over-zealous facebook females”. He is a SBC teaching pastor…

Sure are a whole lot of pastors who think they are able to know the ‘false converts’ by their works. They make a living accusing people daily, and so people think this is not ‘ear tickling’, so it must somehow be true. And they share their videos and sing their praises (proving to their cronies that they are a ‘true convert’)

One ex-FB friend recently likened me to John 8:44 and suggested that many of us in this ‘free grace camp’ are unregenerated.

So sad they don’t see the majority of their time is spent accusing others. They don’t really want to know what the Word says, they spend all their day striving about the law, and really are self-condemned; reminds me of this verse.

But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain. A man that is an heretick after the first and second admonition reject; knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself. Titus 3:9-11

unfortunately “Free Grace” is becoming a biblical term that is getting muddy and being defined by man as among others a cross-less gospel.
the language is being reloaded to another definition.
myself I do my best not to get tangled up in titles of Grace but simply attempt to point souls to Jesus and his finished work.

when a Preacher takes a pulpit like SBC he is binding himself to that pulpit and the doctrine laid down by the ruling elder board. To go against the formal doctrinal statement he is asking to be removed from pulpit.

Email

Please Email Us Dear Friends:
The e-mail at ExPreacherMan is generally for off-topic comments.
Please note that the current administrators of this website are unpaid, unaffiliated laypeople. We have no background in the pastorate, in ministerial counseling, etc.
Anyone is free to disagree with the positions of this ministry. However, our e-mail is not a forum for debate or discussion. We do not go to others’ websites to contradict nor debate them and we respectfully ask that you afford us the same courtesy.
We reserve the right to accept or reject any email.
Please read our "Goals" in the Header above

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

EXCELLENT NEW BOOK !!

We recommend this excellent new book,
Secure Forever! God’s Promise or
Our Perseverance?, by Dr. Tom Cucuzza,
one of my former Assistant Pastors. Available on Barnes & Noble and Amazon.com.
Click the book for a link to Amazon.com.