jdarch commented on 2015-10-06 20:58

luukko commented on 2015-09-13 05:43

@TrialnError: You are right, that makes no sense. It was just a copy-paste error from the adom-restricted PKGBUILD. Copy-paste rarely goes unpunished...

TrialnError commented on 2015-09-11 12:17

I didn't notice that change before. But why adding provides and conflicts to the PKGBUILD where it provides and conflicts its own pkgname?
I noticed this "enhancement" for various PKGBUILDS or requests to add those and argued against it.
Imo there is no much sense to use the logic, where package adom conflicts adom, just to provide adom...

luukko commented on 2015-08-18 07:26

@TrialnError: Thanks, I learned about this feature a while ago from your adom-noteye PKGBUILD :) I plan on implementing it for the next update.