Wednesday, November 1, 2017

Hope, positive thinking, science, and All Saints Day

(This post first appeared on Ethical Musings in October 2014).

Two conflicting – almost diametrically opposed – news
reports recently caught my attention. The first, published in The Atlantic (Maggie Puniewska, "Optimism
is the Enemy of Action," October 17, 2014) reviewed scientific
research that supposedly demonstrates that positive thinking impedes
achievement. The second, published in the New
York Times (Bruce Grierson, "What
if Age Is Nothing but a Mind-Set?" October 22, 2014) argues the
opposite, citing research that suggests a person can retard, perhaps even
prevent aging, by thinking her or himself young. Both studies are worth a read.

Then I came across an article in Science (Tom Siegfried, "In
science, popularity breeds unreliability," October 17, 2014).
Siegfried cites research to show that the popular news media tends to feature
reports of controversial studies and studies with practical implications,
regardless of the quality of the research undergirding the study. That
conclusion made sense to me, especially in view of the two news items I had
read in the previous hour.

Let me advocate two theses.

First, one cannot use good science to prove anything (unlike
the Bible, in which one can find a justification for almost anything!). Unlike
biblical interpretation, quality science functions by using standardized
principles: articulate a thesis; develop testable predictions based upon that
thesis; then test the accuracy of those predictions adhering to recognized
scientific methods and protocols.

Incidentally, a scientific approach to biblical study can
occasionally be helpful. For example, predictions of the end of the world,
based on whatever biblical texts one wishes to consult, represent a thesis (one
can predict the end of the world) that is testable (i.e., a prediction of when
the world will end). To date, the dozens if not hundreds of specific dates
proposed have all proven false. Biblical prophets described God at work in
their world; they did not predict the future.

Good science reports that Ebola is transmitted only through
body fluids (spit, blood, urine, etc.). Ebola is not transmitted through the
air. This is not a matter of opinion or choosing one study over another. There
is simply no evidence of airborne transmission of the virus that causes Ebola.
Religious leaders of all traditions support people in living abundantly by
fighting unfounded fears and promoting courageous living.

Second, positive thinking can enhance one's quality of life
but is no substitute for hard work, perseverance, skill, or knowledge. Hope is
one expression of positive thinking. If a person has no hope of a better future
(or better performance, or positive change – depending upon the specific hope),
then the person is unlikely to change, improve, grow, etc. Hope is essential. I
have repeatedly witnessed the power of hope to transform life. Among the transformations
I have observed are a sick person who believed that they were dying recover
hope for healing and return to health, persons in relationships they thought
were dead revitalize self and the relationship, and persons who had given up on
self experience renewal.

The Bible is an anthology of stories about the power of hope
– positive thinking – transforming life, an anthology of windows through which
the light of God shines and illuminates our lives. This is not a matter of
science, but like science, I have seen the evidence of my thesis (positive
thoughts as one walks in God's light) in the lives of changed people.

All Saints Day, celebrated annually on November 1 (many
churches may celebrate this year on Sunday, November 5), is set aside, in part,
to recall the lives of the countless people in whose lives we can observe God's
transformative love and power at work. Who is your hero in the faith? In whom
do you see, or have you seen, the light of God shining?