Salaries By State

In Louisiana, the average teacher made $26,811 last year, an annual
salary lower than almost anywhere else in the nation. Low pay has
become such a perennial sore point there that the new governor, Mike
Foster, says he'll cut his own pay if teachers' salaries don't reach
the regional average within two years.

The average Connecticut teacher, on the other hand, earns almost
twice as much--$50,598, according to the American Federation of
Teachers. The state's teachers are among the best-paid in the nation,
and top candidates compete fiercely for infrequent job openings.

Salary averages and state rankings are of keen interest to
administrators, policymakers, and especially teachers themselves, but a
growing number of researchers caution that the numbers can be
misleading. Cost of living, education and experience, time spent on the
job, and desirability of the locale all influence the size of a
teacher's paycheck, and some recent studies have tried to take such
variables into account.

Though the resulting adjusted salaries don't create seismic shifts
in rankings, analysts hope their efforts can at least call attention to
the complexities and pitfalls of comparing teacher salaries state by
state. A state with a more experienced teaching force, for example, may
have a higher average salary than one with many young teachers.

A new study by two economists at North Carolina State University in
Raleigh weighs that particular difference, along with cost of living,
teachers' educations, and job characteristics such as hours worked per
week and pupil-teacher ratios. The study, which appeared in the
December issue of the journal Economics in Education Review, could make
teachers in some states think twice about how much they make compared
with teachers in other states. New Hampshire, which ranked 25th among
the states in a straight salary comparison, jumped to ninth in the
adjusted ranking, while Indiana slid from 16th to 38th.

Michael Walden, one of the report's authors, says the study sought
to make teachers more aware of the reasons for salary differentials.
Teachers from lower-paying states, he explains, shouldn't necessarily
covet the salaries of their counterparts in high-paying ones. "The
mistake we don't think the teachers should make is to assume that if
they go up to Connecticut and get this higher salary, they may be
better off,'' he says.

Yet, some teachers might still be justified in making that
assumption even after looking at the findings. According to the study,
Connecticut ranks second in the nation behind Alaska both with and
without the weighted salary rankings. But North Carolina, 29th in the
unadjusted rankings, slips to 35th after the researchers' adjustments.
And of the states that placed in the bottom fourth of all the states in
the unweighted salary ranking, 11 of 13 remained in the bottom fourth
after the researchers included the other factors.

In a report released in October, researchers at the Department of
Education's National Center for Education Statistics offer their own
salary-comparison scale. The authors of the report, Public School
Teacher Cost Differences Across the United States, created a geographic
teacher-cost index that accounts not only for differences among
districts in their requirements for teacher qualifications but also for
a location's attractiveness as a place to live and work.

The researchers began with $23,000 separating the highest and lowest
paying states. After using their regional-cost index, the difference
narrowed to about $14,000. Still, the weighted rankings appeared to
make little difference in the placement of top- and bottom-ranked
states. For both the unadjusted comparisons and the weighted rankings,
Connecticut and Alaska held the top two slots and South Dakota and
Arkansas remained at the bottom.

Jewell Gould, director of research at the American Federation of
Teachers, says the researchers' efforts show what a delicate business
comparing salaries can be. The union recently released its own annual
analysis of average teacher salaries. That analysis, Survey and
Analysis of Salary Trends 1995, offered state salary rankings with
adjustments for cost of living, teacher experience, and employee
contributions for retirement and Social Security.

"There is a national market for teachers,'' Gould says, and states
or districts with low averages "have to be able to explain that things
are a little bit cheaper.'' Gould also points out that statewide
comparisons often cannot account for important local variations, such
as the political priorities of individual counties and districts.
Leaders in some communities, he says, may have cut their education
budgets, even as statewide averages have grown.

John Dunlop, director of collective bargaining and compensation for
the National Education Association, cites an additional difficulty with
weighted comparisons: Researchers often receive inconsistent
information from state to state on such variables as contributions for
health insurance.

Given all the complications, most researchers consider state
rankings to be little more than crude measures of relative
compensation. "State comparisons are very rough, aggregated numbers,''
warns Allan Odden, an education-finance expert at the University of
Wisconsin at Madison who is leading a project on teacher compensation.
"They just tell you Connecticut spends more than Mississippi--they give
you some rough orders.''

Carl Frantz, coordinator of evaluation for two Louisiana teacher
training programs, agrees. "It's OK to look at Connecticut,'' says
Frantz, who has studied Louisiana's high teacher attrition rate. "But
the real question is, are our salaries adequate to attract and keep
teachers? And the answer is no.''

--Jeanne Ponessa

Web Only

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.