from what I know being neutral means "you are in a shade between black and white". It means you cannot determine what is black and what is white. You don't know the difference of right and wrong. So kahit alam mong masama sige kapa rin?? Ganyan ba ang equality sayo?? O baka hindi mo pa rin alam kung gaano kasama ang epekto ng kanilang so-called "homosexuality"??

from what I know being neutral means "you are in a shade between black and white". It means you cannot determine what is black and what is white. You don't know the difference of right and wrong. So kahit alam mong masama sige kapa rin?? Ganyan ba ang equality sayo?? O baka hindi mo pa rin alam kung gaano kasama ang epekto ng kanilang so-called "homosexuality"??

The word does not necessarily pertain to morality. You asked me if I'm pro for religious institutions to conduct same sex marriage or not I told you I did not chose to pick any of the two choices. That's it. Yun lang yun.

You focus too much on morality. The thing is, not all people will agree to YOUR CONCEPT of morality and not all will care about your point of views regarding morality. Especially kung wala namang nalalabag sa batas ng tao ang activities ng mga ni criticize mo. Keep it to yourself. Don't pust it at other's faces. If you think they're going to hell, let them be. Let them do what they want, it's their choice and they did not chose to be like that as science has proven. They have their own minds and it is not your responsibility to herd people to what you or your preacher wants.

So don't be a hero and save yourself first. The more you intrude and offend other people for their lifestyle, the more likely you are going to sin against them anyways.

O baka hindi mo pa rin alam kung gaano kasama ang epekto ng kanilang so-called "homosexuality"?? - What are you referring to? Negative health effects? If yes, then it only means we need to help them more get over the health issues. Negative effects on ones personality or choices? Unahan na kita kung yan ang tinutukoy mo. That's pure BS unless a major study could find such results and it is replicated.

While I do not have any means to provide you proof kung nagiging masamang tao nga ba ang mga LGBT people because of their sexuality dahil hindi naman ako Psychologist or scientist sa ganyang field para mag bigay ng data (I am assuming when you said na may masamang epekto ang homosexualidad, you meant moral issues). At least I know some of them, I have friends and family members na LGBT. They do not break laws nor offend people.

Morally fit for our society. Did their sexual orientation served as a hindrance for them to be good citizens? No. That's what I see.

Science has shown that more evidence is showing up that homosexuality is not a choice and forcing them to be heterosexual will have a backlash on them (mentally). So are you still going to tell me that they are still doomed to be bad people? How about checking crime rates? Sila ba ang madalas na involved? Of course not.

So you're asking for proofs. Malamang dahil nasa internet tayo links lang to sa mga articles. Kung links lang din then go for reputable websites like livescience or iflscience who have real professionals working on their sites to do fact checking. Before you post your anti-LGBT links please take it with a grain of salt.

Also.. Since you are asking for proof. Eh ikaw ang may claim na may masamang effect. The BURDEN OF PROOF LIES WITH YOU dahil ikaw ang may claim. You want me to believe? Conduct your own study. Give us the numbers, the statistics and data. Tell us who you are working with and they must be of reputable image within the scientific community. Not only you have to prove it to me, but also to the whole world dahil LGBT is worldwide.

So after saying all of those anti LGBT statements you insisted here, you ain't gonna' back it up and take responsibility to prove it? Tapos biglang bahala kayo sa buhay nyo? mmmmm..... OK. Kami na naloloko

So Peter La Barbera is your source of knowledge...Did a bit of background check about Mr. La Barbera and found this wikipedia page about him.

Peter LaBarbera (born 1963) is an American social conservative activist and the president of the anti-gay organization Americans for Truth about Homosexuality (AFTAH).

LaBarbera has been criticised for spreading hate speech and misinformation about homosexuality, with AFTAH being designated as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) for spreading "hateful propaganda".

Yan. See that? Read it and see how it directly contradicts Labarbera's point of views about converting homosexuals to ex-gays. Resulting into misinformation since homosexuality to begin with is not a choice. It is normal. Even animals exhibit this.

So yeah everyone can edit a wikipedia article, while at the same time people can make grandiose claims tapos hindi pinapatunayan. Atleast I would give credit to the wikipedia editors atleast sila, yung nilagay nila has basis dahil totoo naman na may mga claims si Labarbera na malayo sa Sciencia.

It's either you did not read my last post well or you did not understand when I said "The current scientific consensus about homosexuality is normal" condition lang siya. I don't need to read off of a link that totally disagrees with it. Because siguradong misinformation yan kung salungat siya.

Morality is something culturally defined as with the terms "normal and standards". What's right to you maybe wrong to others. You want to claim your brand of religious morality as universal? You can start with proving God's existence. Scientifically.

So who told you na nanggaling tayo sa mga unggoy specifically? We had a common primate ancestor (a hominid) with monkeys. Your question is flawed. Evolution does not work that way. Hindi porque nag evolve and isang member ng species ay mag eevolve na ang entire species. There's no reason for monkeys not to exist.

It's 2016. Are we still believing in FUNDAMENTALIST Creationsim?

I have no idea who Tonette Macho is but I found this interview video and I think it pretty much shows na technically homosexual parin siya. "Kung nandoon yes tukso, yes nadyaan parin. Nandyaan parin. Kung may nakita ako'ng guwapo. Guwapo." - Bro. Anthony Roquel.

I respect his willpower to abstain from his bodily desires. But this does not equate into a homosexual turning heterosexual dahil sexually attracted parin.

Obviously you do not understand the word theory when used by scientists. So yeah it is a theory, but you do not understand the gravity of the word. It's doesn't mean the same with the everyday word "theory".

I'm theistic agnostic. Sorry, I just wanted to see how you'll respond if sabihin ko na Satanist ako. Funny, when you try to promote science and reason you could get branded as a Satanist and lacking of morals.

You want me to be blunt? I find your argument weak/inferior and full of misinformation. Your posts lack useful content/information for your cause and at the same time you tend to ignore or maybe even intentionally avoiding my rebuttals when you can't defend against it. (So ako naman ang mukhang mayabang ngayon)