They claimed the rating drop was a computer glitch and when I kept complaining because they wouldn't, or couldn't rectify the problem, they labled me as a cheater and closed my account. I was a member for 28 months and had 8 months remaining on my membership. So, they beat me out of $20.00 in membership fees as well.

This was not my first run in with them. Not so long ago. they changed the time limit rules in a tournament after everyone had already joined and started to play. When I complained, they said you can quit but we will penalize you. In other words it was, "go stick it in your ear."

There are plenty of other chess web sites on the Internet. I'll just move on to the next one.

wht does top 1 2 3 4 match mean? like they compare his games to the computer engine.. and its exactly what the engine would do?

heres a hypothetical. what if someone got so good..they literally played like the rybka or fritz engine.. (capablanca was one of the greats where computers dont find errors in his games) what would happen then when chess evloves into super geniuses who study computer chess from age 5.. by 21 they are super GM's... but if u compare their games to an engine it would seem as if they use it.

wht does top 1 2 3 4 match mean? like they compare his games to the computer engine.. and its exactly what the engine would do?

heres a hypothetical. what if someone got so good..they literally played like the rybka or fritz engine.. (capablanca was one of the greats where computers dont find errors in his games) what would happen then when chess evloves into super geniuses who study computer chess from age 5.. by 21 they are super GM's... but if u compare their games to an engine it would seem as if they use it.

Short answer: The greatest players don't play like Rybka the way the cheaters do. They've been tested.

wht does top 1 2 3 4 match mean? like they compare his games to the computer engine.. and its exactly what the engine would do?

heres a hypothetical. what if someone got so good..they literally played like the rybka or fritz engine.. (capablanca was one of the greats where computers dont find errors in his games) what would happen then when chess evloves into super geniuses who study computer chess from age 5.. by 21 they are super GM's... but if u compare their games to an engine it would seem as if they use it.

Even if that could happen they would be known as super genius GMs. Not patzers who somehow play just like chess engines.

The rate at which cheating detection algorithms evolve is most likely faster than the rate at which human chess abilities can improve. While no system will ever be perfect, I have confidence that it will be good enough.