Yes, I agree that it can help search important messages, without tons of gerrit notifications.<br><br clear="all">Best regards,<br>Anton Kochkov.<br><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Oliver Schinagl <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:oliver@schinagl.nl" target="_blank">oliver@schinagl.nl</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
As a lurker, mostly anyway, I wholeheartedly agree. And I think for the 'you can set up a filter' group, I think the opposite is true. You can just setup a filter for the gerrit mails to put mails into the same directory I suppose too :)<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>

<br>
Oliver</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On 08/08/12 23:28, Alex G. wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
<br>
I've brought this up today on IRC. My main argument is that the<br>
coreboot mailing list should be a place for discussion, for newcomers<br>
asking for help, talking about the future of the project, etc.<br>
Definitely more for discussion and less for patch review.<br>
<br>
We have gerrit for patch review. Some (actually, a lot) of people<br>
prefer to do their reviews by replying to the gerrit emails. It's<br>
awesome to have this option. The more the merrier, right? Right.<br>
<br>
Back in the days -- I mean waaaay back, think patchwork and svn --<br>
doing patch review on the list, with some deficiencies, worked fine.<br>
We switched to git and gerrit. We eventually got to the problem that<br>
gerrit traffic accounts for most of the traffic on the mailing list.<br>
It makes the list irritatingly clobbered for some people, to the point<br>
they just stop using it.<br>
<br>
The argument from the "I like gerrit in the mailinglist" camp is<br>
"setting up your own filter to keep out gerrit message is easy". We<br>
can't really force people to do this. They (myself included) would<br>
rather stoThp using the mailing list.<br>
<br>
All I've said and refuted above are arguments and rants we like to use<br>
to tease each other. I strongly believe that it makes sense, now more<br>
than ever, to separate development and discussion traffic into two<br>
separate lists. I hope you all agree.<br>
<br>
Alex<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)<br>
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - <a href="http://enigmail.mozdev.org/" target="_blank">http://enigmail.mozdev.org/</a><br>
<br>
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQItoNAAoJEL0kPH<u></u>NPXJJK+UIP/2yVfa/<u></u>UziIDeQRJdhhUOs1C<br>
UlGji9eLHw4rPxm9NS+3n+<u></u>s3bmQDdnOMZkOZ0mbXCO/<u></u>ufTCZurbZ7uOlDQasTYtt<br>
rPyU5GeMnILhH159ZIAo8KBI53HrBH<u></u>+<u></u>RdxOyxY0gVvSw5Vb2Ye4LVCTvrfDIZ<u></u>Jo3<br>
p+<u></u>h7aPeAaR8mApwo24PAqJX9NDYZjytf<u></u>uOFZ91Jw8YS5BXykH8oa8Xj32ezqt7<u></u>fV<br>
lxOqew7UjNdVT26aCuHnTqlPYUw/<u></u>Nl97iluWrebd8Rre6PLai03dxXqVlv<u></u>gHHVXJ<br>
UzJFflwAn4gEjnYrOfd4qu/<u></u>sCkWJkCQDfYx/<u></u>DAiJtkPjUeY1FNw1Dnibsi6mP+F3<br>
IleLl/<u></u>SWxv21UnZM6OJ999CxYTdXD2sNytlM<u></u>65d67UniGfeN6v1ARPZG0l2FzsRC<br>
PfUhrcPKryAsVCf4otWI64QUT0r0Kg<u></u>xU6qUdX6ZOvFerKcE+<u></u>ono8ERJCL4v9TBB+<br>
DVJGV2Dil+67FPzPriRhcLufPfQ14+<u></u>B8BRNcFYbYOkmgjBtRmrZk/<u></u>WvaEU5uVvII<br>
sbXbEzfSKrCKGr/<u></u>K00XPRti0CRg7wn6MVeVsLTxvA5HMI<u></u>kuGxd9FfmG9EPrC0JXZ<br>
tljwICM4AJkbQ6EkDg2Z66SUWnPBtf<u></u>iCLNyPs8IfK5rfYkhkreqnWRtwxl8U<u></u>a7SE<br>
Lk13bwHJ/Jyf5r3RDAJU<br>
=543W<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
coreboot mailing list: <a href="mailto:coreboot@coreboot.org" target="_blank">coreboot@coreboot.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot" target="_blank">http://www.coreboot.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/coreboot</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>