Home » Five Elements of Normative Ethics - A General Theory of Normative Individualism

TITLE

Five Elements of Normative Ethics - A General Theory of Normative Individualism

AUTHOR(S)

Pfordten, Dietmar

PUB. DATE

August 2012

SOURCE

Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Aug2012, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p449

SOURCE TYPE

Academic Journal

DOC. TYPE

Article

ABSTRACT

The article tries to inquire a third way in normative ethics between consequentialism or utilitarianism and deontology or Kantianism. To find such a third way in normative ethics, one has to analyze the elements of these classical theories and to look if they are justified. In this article it is argued that an adequate normative ethics has to contain the following five elements: (1) normative individualism, i. e., the view that in the last instance moral norms and values can only be justified by reference to the individuals concerned, as its basis; (2) consideration of the individuals' concerns and interests-aims, desires, needs, strivings-insofar as they have a justificatory function; (3) a pluralism of references of these concerns and hence of moral norms and values to all possible elements of actions; (4) the necessity of a principle of aggregation and weighing with regard to these concerns; (5) finally, as a central principle of aggregation and weighing, the principle of relative reference to self and others, operating as a generalizing meta-principle that guides the application of concrete principles and decisions.

ACCESSION #

78191347

Related Articles

A definition of the phrase "act utilitarianism" is presented. It refers to the official form of utilitarianism, which states that a person's duty on any occasion is to act in the way which will produce consequences better than those that any other action open to them would produce.

What makes killing morally wrong? And what makes killing morally worse than letting die? Standard answers to these two questions presuppose that killing someone involves shortening that person's life. Yet, as I argue in the first two sections of this article, this presupposition is false:...

Consequentialism is often charged with demandingness objections which arise in response to the theory's commitment to impartiality. It might be thought that the only way that consequentialists can avoid such demandingness objections is by dropping their commitment to impartialism. However, I...

This article proposes a way of understanding Kantianism, act-utilitarianism and some other important ethical theories according to which they are all versions of the same kind of theory, sharing a common structure. I argue that this is a profitable way to understand the theories discussed. It is...

When presented with a situation involving an agent's choice between alternative actions, a moral oracle says what the agent is allowed to do. The oracle bases her advice on some moral theory, but the nature of that theory is not known by us. The moral oracle's test consists in determining...

This article focuses on literature on utilitarianism. For a long time, it appears, the internal structure of consequentialism was regarded as relatively unproblematic. During the last two or three decades, however, such structural questions have received much more attention. Classical...

In this article I criticize the non-consequentialist Weighted Lottery (WL) solution to the choice between saving a smaller or a larger group of people. WL aims to avoid what non-consequentialists see as consequentialism's unfair aggregation by giving equal consideration to each individual's...