This web-log, begun in 2011 for the purpose of clarifying the true nature of the work and views of Dr. William Pierce, and to counter misrepresentations thereof, is not affiliated with any organization.

Monday, December 31, 2012

All songs by Joseph Pryce except Horst Wessell Song paraphrased by Joseph Pryce.

Dresden's new album, Call of the Blood, is a new kind of music for White people. Crafted with jewel-like care; with haunting, poetic lyrics; beautiful yet powerful arrangements and instrumentation; and soaring vocals; Call of the Blood combines the best elements of rock and traditional European music. Call of the Blood includes a lyric sheet to help you fully experience the impact of these new, masterfully written and produced songs. Call of the Blood will open a gateway in the minds of Aryan youth to a new and brighter future. – Kevin Alfred Strom

Heart sublime and will so pure,Since your passing we are sureThat you light the wayTo a shining day.

So much courage in your heart.Gave your life that truth might startOn her stellar quest.George, you passed the test.

What makes a man give his life for his race?They'd have us vanish from Earth without trace,But you wait in the wings for the moment of our call.

GLR, now the tide is advancing,But we'll all hold the lineAnd rise as one, in the sun.GLR, spare us some of your spirit,For our victory is nigh,And you are here, like a god.George Lincoln Rockwell, come back and save us....

Jefferson, John C. Calhoun: where did you go, wherever did you go?Washington, and Franklin too, where did you go, wherever did you go?America, I miss you, miss you: I want to come back home.America, I need to see you, I need to come back home.Edgar Poe and Mencken, love you so, I wanted you to know.Ambrose Bierce, and Dr. Pierce – love you so, I wanted you to know.

Arya, Arya, Savitri Devi,Shine like a star....

Get the monkey who's paid to sing, to get a monkey to bear the ring2;Get the stars 'cause they're sure to bring cash to ransom a captured king.Do you have no shame? Who will take the blame?

It's the aliens' turn to be driven into the foaming sea.We will rise and we'll do much more, 'til we're victors from shore to shore.Then we'll stage some trials.Gibbets3 stretch for miles.

We're on the march today to Whidbey Island; we've found a reason to live today, on Whidbey Island.Maybe, now we know just why this young man had to die.He saw the gleaming dawn; he asked the question.We follow him where he's led, O Northern Bastion.Our people must not die; we'll never live a lie.We've built our fires tonight on Whidbey Island.The flames will rise and rise from Whidbey Island.And then the world will know, how from a spark the flames will grow.O Whidbey Island.

Slay, slay the dragon: go, go for, go for the throat.ZOG has me in its power walking on the brink.ZOG tells me what to do and everything I think.ZOG – I awake at night and ZOG is at the door;ZOG – I would free myself, I'm living like a whore.

How can you live with this evil?The tune's been called by the devil.How fares your soul, little citizen?Get off your knees, little citizen!

Take the mask off, let's see what is inside.Plastic demon2, let's see what you would hide.Manila envelope comes to my door, watching me, watching me crawl on the floor.Juli can tell me the truth if I want, and he'll perform any trick, any stunt.

I won't trust any old fox on the heath; I won't give dirty DSJs3 my seat.I wouldn't trust Mr. Suess on his oath: Juli has told me, "Watch out for them both!"

ARYANS: We know we fear you, you tell me – KIKES: Impossible!ARYANS: We would avoid you, you tell me – KIKES: Impossible!ARYANS: Can we avoid you? You tell me – KIKES: Impossible!ARYANS: But we'll destroy you and then you must –

Juli, they beat you4, they f---ed with your pride.Moulies abused you with mouths opened wide.Yet you returned in a plain-paper bag, taller and whiter thanSnow-covered crag.

As they strolled through the park near the flashing of the fountains,the full moon shed its light on the lovers as they walked.Sweet was the nighttime to the dreamers; warm is the feeling of new love.But there's a shadow moving swiftly through the darkness – And they are not protected, and they won't see the day.

Danger in Central Park, Zooland, USA, where the primates kill and feast each and every day.Sad, o so sad, but no one complains;Bad, very bad, they should all be in chains.

There's the crunch of the leaves as the killer moves in closer;but they don't seem to hear as he moves toward their tryst.Sweet was the nighttime to the dreamers; warm is the gushing of their blood.Stranger, you must shed a tear for our poor lovers – For they were not protected, and did not see the day....

Big belly bourgeois he sends me my checkAnd if he don't I will narrow his neckFor I have emerged in the land of the freeWith dope for your kids and much money for me

I'll never go – I'm nailed down you knowI'll stay 'til the trumpets of doom.Your streets are gold; they're bought and they're sold;Get out of my way, just make room!

I like to party in de daytimeI like to party in de nighttimeWhen I wake up I say as I start the new day"I'm so glad that I came to America!"The living is free and my family's with meI'm so glad that I'll never go home.

"Give me your lazy, your botched, and your whores"--That's what you say as we land on your shores.You are a milk-cow with millions of teatsWe got the mouths and we sure got the wits.

We'll never go – we're nailed down you know;We'll stay in these well-furnished rooms.Your streets are gold, they're bought and they're sold;Get out of our way; we're your doom!

I want to live in a White AmerikaI'll find my fate in a White Imperium.

Smash the system – Off with their heads.

NOTES:

1. National Socialist official and publisher, ritually murdered for his writings by Jews in 1946.2. Composer Richard Wagner's term for the Jew.3. "Department Store Jewess"4. Streicher was tortured by Negroes at Nuremberg.5. This sentence was the original title of Mein Kampf.

One of the last National Alliance meetings Dr. Pierce attended before his untimely death in July, 2002, was in February of that year down in North Georgia at Chester Doles' National Alliance Local Unit's headquarters building which Chester and other Alliance built for the purpose of holding their regular meetings.

Mr. Doles' Local Unit was broken up when federal authorities sent him off to prison on a trumped up weapons possession charge soon after Dr. Pierce's death. More here: http://www.rickross.com/reference/kkk/kkk66.html

Hans Schmidt was a long time friend of Dr. Pierce's. For years, well into the 1990s, Dr. Pierce's primary transportation while living in West Virginia was a 1972 Opel Kadett station wagon that Mr. Schmidt had given to him after it could no longer pass the stringent emissions standards for the Washington, DC, area.

Mr. Schmidt, who was chairman of the German American National Political Action Committee (GAN-PAC), died in 2010, but not before authoring several books, all available at Amazon.com. Here are a couple of interesting Amazon reviews of his last book:
---

This book is unique in that it is a response to an opposing book written by a boyhood friend of the author. To me, that makes it potentially a very effective way to teach people critical-thinking skills. Get this book, than get Bruno Manz's book and read both of them. Make your own decision on who is more concerned with actual truth. Normally people never do this, but there is no better way to open your eyes. I have done this more than anyone I have ever known and there is much we can learn from books like these. I think we can certainly learn more than we learn from constantly hearing better and better (read "more extreme") versions of the official view of WW2. That's not thinking, that's training. History really is written by the victors. You can see that clearly just from reading this book.

This book is so interesting, unique and eye-opening that it should be read in high schools so people can look at the War from other perspectives. You cannot discount what he is saying just because some of it is politically incorrect. He includes examples and quotes from everyone from Julius Streicher to Elie Wiesel. He also does a lot of what I call "psychological archaeology" -- where he shows that Germans were most definitely not evil or irrational. In fact, they appear to have been much more reasonable and rational than most people today. We are all subject to propaganda -- which sinks into us because of what we see as a "respectable" opinion more than from the actual arguments. Most people only later come up with rationalizations for their views, not really ever knowing where those views came from. Social conditioning can shape your brain completely, and you will never learn to really think without reading books like these which show where the opinions you have originate.. There are not many books like this out there. This book definitely made my mind more free. Its better than any self-help book I ever read in that regard. It allows you to really think rather than just producing well-trained responses. Exercise your freedom of speech and read it. An amazing book by an amazing man -- a real piece of history. It is a shame that it is out of print and so expensive now. I still think it is worth it at 100.00. It is that good.

After reading Hans Schmidt's previous two books (Jailed in 'Democratic' Germany, and SS Panzergrenadier) I have come to love the author and his works. His style is so unique. He uses such great examples to really illustrate his point, and his books are real eye openers. This latest one is no different. Again, I was enthralled from first page to last, and I learned so much on a topic that is usually either distorted or suppressed. Hats off to Waffen-SS veteran Hans Schmidt! He is a symbol of courage and truth in a world in which cowardice and lies dominate.

Friday, November 30, 2012

When
it was cited by Niccolo Machiavelli early in the 16th century, it
already was a strategy which the enemies of our people have used
successfully against us more than once, and it is the strategy which is
responsible for our present peril.

Surprisingly, the division of our people is widely discussed in
front of us by the enemies who have accomplished it, although the
discussions are heavily laden with disingenuousness: the heterosexual
White male, they gloat, has been dispossessed; his power has been taken
by minorities and women, and there is nothing he can do about it except
learn to live with the fait accompli.

Actually, it's not that simple. The division itself is far more
complicated than heterosexual White males on one side and Jews,
homosexuals, Blacks, Asians, mestizos, and women on the other. The most
important complication is that many White women, probably a majority,
are on the side of their men; and many heterosexual White males have
joined the other side. Furthermore, there is much which can be done
about the situation.

The division we would like to see, of course, is all heterosexual
White men and women on one side and all Jews homosexuals, Blacks Asians,
and mestizos on the other. Then we would be ready for the shooting to
start, and we would settle matters pretty quickly. The Jews understand
that, and that is why their efforts have been directed not only at
empowering the non-Whites and the perverts but also toward alienating as
many White men and women from their own race as possible.

I remember talking to groups of White college students 25 years ago
and pointing out to them where the "civil rights" agitation, which even
then had become quite fashionable on campuses, was heading. I told them
that it would lead to the decline of our morals and our culture, the
disintegration of our society, and finally to a race war between Whites
and Blacks in America. Most of the students just listened without
noticeable reaction, as if they were watching another television
program. Only a small minority expressed either a favorable or
unfavorable response. Nearly all of the former were males:
unfortunately, many of them males with a low testosterone level, who
crept up to me quietly afterward and expressed their approval when no
one else was around to hear them.

Both males and females were among my vocal opponents, but I was
always sad to note that the girls tended to be more numerous and more
hostile than the boys. After a talk I gave at the University of
Maryland, one White girl proudly, " Well, if there's a race war between
Whites and Blacks, I'll be shooting at you from the Black side."

I spoke to a class of seniors at a private high school, also in
Maryland, and while the teacher smirked in the back of the class a
blonde girl in the front row sat next to the only Black male in the
class and kissed and fondled him throughout my talk, in an obviously
prearranged effort to disconcert me.

Women are much more fashion conscious than men. Of course, there are
men, even heterosexual men, who worry very much about wearing the
latest style in cuff links or ties, but women have always been far ahead
of them in such matters, far more easily persuaded that they absolutely
had to buy new wardrobes every time the fashion moguls raised or lowered hems an inch.

The Jews, to their credit, understood before the rest of us that the
female tendency to be a slave to fashion is an innate, sex-linked
characteristic, and they also realized that ideological fashions could
bind women as strongly as fashions in dress and ornament. It's no
coincidence that nearly all of the influential gurus and heroines of
feminism of the past half-century have been Jewesses: Betty Friedan,
Bella Abzug, Andrea Dworkin, Shulamith Firestone, Lucy Komisar, Lynda
Schor, Gloria Steinem, ad nauseam.

Thus, the arbiters of fashion in Hollywood and New York who used the
cinema and television to make racial mixing fashionable among the
trendy set also made feminism fashionable among White women. The madness
has gone so far today that substantial numbers of otherwise normal,
heterosexual White women have let themselves be persuaded that not only
can they be just as capable combat pilots or firefighters as men but
that only women really know how to give women sexual fulfillment.

Fortunately, most of them have not yet brought practice into line
with that doctrine, but they have managed to make themselves thoroughly
neurotic trying to reconcile doctrine with instinct. More relevant to
the matter under discussion here, many women have let themselves be
maneuvered into a position where they view any assault on the currently
fashionable ideology of racial equality as an assault on their "right"
as women to be military school cadets or corporate raiders. These women
have a subconscious understanding that this "right" is just as
artificial as the "equality" claimed by non-Whites and homosexuals, and
they have accepted these others as their allies in fending off the
efforts of heterosexual White males to drag them out of the cockpit and
the boardroom and put them back into the kitchen, the bedroom, and the
nursery. They have bought the Jewish argument that heterosexual White
males should be regarded with suspicion until the latter have
demonstrated their "sensitivity."

Unfortunately, all too many men have done just that. Men may not be
quite as trendy as women, on the average, but that's not saying much for
them. The difference is a matter of degree, not kind. There are all too
many men who are as afraid of having a Politically Incorrect idea in
their heads as the average woman is of being caught in unfashionable
attire: if "sensitivity" is "in," they gladly will put on the most
disgusting display of it. And there are men who simply have no ideas in
their heads except getting ahead. Unlike the "sensitive" ones, they have
no shortage of testosterone, but they also have no sense of
responsibility or propriety: they will ally themselves to whatever
faction seems to offer them the best career prospects, and they will pay
lip service to the corresponding ideology. Like the feminists, they
will regard any other man who tries to rock the boat they are in as the
enemy.

************************

...[W]e may find ourselves allied with many people whom in the past we
barely tolerated: the religious zealots of the Christian right, the
essentially conservative types, [etc.]...

************************

Actually, that's too stark a picture. Most people, on both sides,
are not really partisans. They're just spectators, who find themselves,
by accident more than by choice, in one camp or the other, and they sing
along with the crowd without really thinking about the meaning of the
words.

That makes the division no less real and no less dangerous for us,
however. If looking at the great, passive middle tends to blur the
division, it is sharp enough at the extremes, where there is passion
aplenty: passion most often expressed as hate.

In the trendier circles of Washington, D.C., and other large,
eastern cities, there is more bigotry than there ever was in a Ku Klux
Klan klavern. It may be that back in the 1930s some of the more backward
Klansmen didn't like Catholics or foreigners (although the Klan since
has had the good sense to drop those divisions), but that's nothing
compared to what the Politically Correct bigots in Washington don't like
today.

Walk into one of their cocktail parties wearing a National Rifle
Association button, and the conversation will freeze as suddenly as it
would if Nelson Mandela showed up at a Klan picnic. If you speak with a
rural accent, you will be regarded with immediate suspicion. If you are
from the South, then you'll be expected to prove that it's only the
"New" South of Jews, Blacks, and Politically Correct yuppies with which
you have any connections. If you're especially "Aryan-looking" (a la Rutger Hauer or Darryl Hannah, for example), you can deflect hostility by coming with a Black date.

In these circles the word "White," used as a racial designation,
evokes instant fear and loathing, especially among the Whites. They
usually won't admit their hatred of their own kind to nontrendies, but
among themselves they are quite open about it. They all agree that it is
a good thing that North America is becoming darker, and they look
forward eagerly to the day when the continent will have a non-White
majority. Things will be much better then, they all aver: the greatest
evil on the planet, White racism, finally will be suppressed, and love
and brotherhood will reign.

When they watch a cowboys-and-Indians movie, they always root for
the Indians: when a White is scalped or tied to a stake to be burned,
they cheer. Reading The Turner Diaries, or any book in which the
Whites win, "sickens" them, (to borrow the word most often used by
mainstream journalists to describe their reaction to my novel in the
reviews they wrote of it following the Oklahoma City bombing). Viewing
Leni Riefenstahl's Triumph of the Will, with its magnificent
portrayal of proud, racially conscious White men and women, is a
"chilling" experience, they say, even though it was made by the greatest
woman cinematic genius.

Their dream world is one high in melanin and low in testosterone. It
is a world where strong women, wearing trousers and holding the key
executive positions, share power with Blacks, Jews, and other
non-Whites, and everyone lives in a city much like New York. Everything
will be run by committees, and problems will be solved by talking them
to death. White males will be tolerated in subservient positions, if
they are either homosexual or have been "sensitized." This picture of
the world is one which has been drilled into them during the past 30
years, starting at puberty with MTV and Politically Correct comic books.

They tend to fall into the mistaken belief that they are the
universe, because they live inside a media-generated illusion-world and
talk only with each other. But they do chatter in nervous fright
whenever they are reminded that there are some of those awful
heterosexual White males left out there who haven't been sensitized yet.
They look to the government to protect them from this threat and
maintain their empowerment, and they are hot to have the government use
whatever measures are expedient for that purpose. In particular, they
want a roundup of guns and a clampdown on Politically Incorrect speech.

Then there's our side of the division. Close to the middle are those
White men and women who still believe that the traditional family, with
a male breadwinner and protector and a female homemaker, is not only
worth saving, but that it's the natural way for men and women to
live and by far the best way to raise emotionally and spiritually
healthy children.

Unfortunately, the changes in American society during the past half
century or so have made the traditional family an endangered species. In
1940 most married women were full-time homemakers. Between 1940 and
1990 the portion of married women working outside the home increased
by a factor of four, to approximately 60 percent. More than half of
married mothers with children under 17 years of age are now employed
full time outside the home, and the percentage rises every year.

This change has not been entirely a matter of choice: increasing
urbanization of the economy, with jobs moving from rural to urban areas,
and the rising cost of housing relative to per capita income have made
it much more difficult to maintain a family on one income. Greatly
exacerbating the situation, however, has been a trend in lifestyles
toward ever greater consumption. People on both sides of the division
have let themselves be persuaded that they cannot live without many
things that their grandparents found quite unnecessary.

************************

Close to
the middle are those White men and women who still believe

that the
traditional family, with a male breadwinner and protector and

a female
homemaker, is not only worth saving, but that it's the natural way

for men
and women to live and by far the best way to raise

emotionally
and spiritually healthy children.

************************

The division at the middle, then, is
not between people who are members of traditional families on our
side and those with working wives and mothers on the other. Rather,
it is between those who would live in traditional families if they
could, and those who regard traditional families as old-fashioned and
repressive and look on the present trend with favor.

Looking at the division from a
different viewpoint, those near the middle on our side are those who
value freedom above comfort and security, while the converse is true
for those on the other side. The herd instinct is a little weaker on
our side than on theirs. They have a near monopoly on authoritarian
personalities: on people who like to speak with reverence of “our
President” and “our government” and to hate anyone who lacks
their reverence.

We look to ourselves to satisfy our
needs; they look to the government. We also tend to live more in tune
with our instincts-more the way God intended us to live, the
Christians on our side would say-while the others favor life-styles
as artificial as their politics.

As we move further away from the
middle, the passion becomes stronger. Trendy people-people who always
want to do only what everyone else is doing and would never dream of
striking out in a new direction, away from the crowd, or trying
something they hadn't seen on television-feel comfortable with lots
of rules and regulations. Things that aren't regulated by the
government make them nervous. They like to buy licenses and apply for
permits and pay fees and be told just what's permissible and what
isn't. It's like having a stamp of assurance from the government that
what they're doing is fashionable, or at least acceptable.

They cannot imagine the feeling of rage
and resentment that rises in people with a more independent or
adventurous nature when the latter are confronted with one of these
artificial government barriers. Here's an example: When I was a kid I
loved fireworks. I could go to a fireworks store and buy whatever I
wanted. I could ride my bicycle to a vacant lot and set off my
firecrackers and bottle rockets without violating any laws. Today
there are very few places left in the United States where kids can do
that. Certainly, there always were inept dolts who managed to blow
off a finger or lose an eye playing with fireworks, just as there are
people who will manage to shoot themselves or a member of the family
by accident if they get their hands on a gun. We used to be willing
to accept such risks. We were aware that if you're not careful you
can hurt yourself. We understood that living was an inherently
dangerous business. We preferred a world in which there were freedom
and risks to a supposedly safer world walled in by rules.

By the time I was 12 years old or so, I
had developed a more serious interest in rockets and related matters
than store-bought fireworks could satisfy. I used to take the money I
made mowing lawns in Dallas, Texas, and get an adult to give me a
ride downtown to Greene Brothers, the big laboratory supply
warehouse, where I would give a clerk the list of chemicals and
glassware I wanted, and then I would walk through the warehouse with
him while he found the items for me on the shelves. A dollar would
buy more nitric acid or powdered aluminum in those days than it will
today. The important thing , though, was that I didn't have to fill
out any forms or show the clerk a permit from the government to buy
what I wanted.

Pyrotechnics isn't everyone's thing, of
course, but the same thicket of government restrictions has overgrown
nearly every activity that's not on the beaten path: flying your own
airplane, building your own house, collecting your own firearms,
operating your own business. It can't be that the government is
trying to protect us with its restrictions: it still pays farmers to
grow an addictive drug which causes the deaths of 400,000 cigarette
smokers in the United States every year. Whatever the government's
reason, it is infuriating to plenty of people besides me.

I live in one of those rare, backwoodsy
places where there are no building codes, and a property owner
doesn't have to ask city hall for permission to dig a hole in his
backyard or change his plumbing around. He just does it, and it's
nobody's business but his. The trendier locals are trying to change
that. They believe that building codes are “progressive” or
something of the sort, and they want to have the same sort of rules
that property owners in Philadelphia and New York have. Fortunately,
there are plenty of other folks like me around here who are
resisting, but the trendies are looking for allies in the state
government. People who live in New York just wouldn't understand, but
there are those of us who really get steamed about such things.

It used to be that men valued their
personal honor above all other things, and governments understood
and accommodated themselves to their citizens' sense of honor, albeit
reluctantly in many cases. That was a long time ago, of course. Even
some politicians had a sense of personal honor. (That was a very
long time ago.)

************************

It
used to be that men valued their personal honor above

all
other things, and government understood and accommodated

themselves
to their citizens' sense of honor...

************************

In those olden
days, if a man were in public with his wife, and a stranger made a
lewd remark to her or put his hands on her, the offender could count
on having to defend his life. If the husband killed or seriously
injured him, and there were witnesses to the original offense, the
husband would have been justified in his actions, in the eyes of his
peers and of the government. Similar considerations applied if the
original offense were against the husband himself. The corollary to
this was that people tended to be more polite in public, more careful
not to give offense.

How different it is
today! The feminists become infuriated at the mere suggestion that a
man should feel any obligation to protect a woman. Protection
suggests a sense of possession. Protection is a job for the
government, not for individual men. And the Jews, who always have
regarded with a sneering sort of amusement and disbelief the Aryans'
willingness to fight for the sake of honor, have joined the feminists
in moving us all into a more enlightened era, where honor counts for
nothing.

There are, of
course, a few of us whose hearts are still back in the Stone Age. We
may control ourselves most of the time. We may swallow insults and
other offenses without reprisal, just to stay out of jail; but when
we do, we feel dishonored, and when we feel dishonored a feeling of
hatred begins building in us: hatred against the government which
forced us to dishonor ourselves, hatred against the politicians and
the bureaucrats and the other supporters of the government.

I am acquainted
with the details of a recent case in which a White man and his wife
were insulted in a mall parking lot by a Black who had nearly hit
their car with his. After screaming his insults about White
“crackers” and “honkies” and being told in turn that he and
his fellow “niggers” should go back to Africa, the Black drove
off, then came back a few minutes later with a Black friend and a
brick. Advancing on foot with the brick in hand toward the car in
which the White man and his wife were sitting, the Black screamed at
the White man, “I'm gonna smash your motherf-ing head in.”
Whereupon, the White man tore open his glove compartment, grabbed a
pistol, and shot the Black dead.

During
the subsequent trial, both the defense and prosecution witnesses
agreed that the Black had threatened to smash the White man's head
with a brick. The only difference in the testimony was that the
prosecution's witnesses-the Black's male friend and a White
woman-said that the Black dropped his brick and took a couple of
steps backward just before he was shot, while the defense said that
the Black still was holding the brick when the White man fired. The
key to the outcome of the trial, however, was that the prosecution
emphasized that the White man, who was a university graduate with a
good job and a stable marriage, happened to be a “racist,” who
didn't believe that Blacks should be permitted to remain in America.
The Jewish prosecutor read excerpts to the court from Politically
Incorrect books and letters seized from the White couple's home.

The
mostly White jury, showing to the world that it had no sympathy for
White “racists,” brought in a Politically Correct verdict of
guilty of premeditated murder,
and the White judge sentenced the White man to life in
prison. Such an egregious
injustice may be considered only a fluke by some-the consequence of
an unlucky combination of a “sensitive” jury, a Jewish
prosecutor, a politically ambitious judge, and an inept defense
lawyer-but those who pay attention to such matters can cite a hundred
similar cases from recent years.

The Jews, the feminists, and their
collaborators would like to lock up all of us Stone Age men, who
would rather fight than crawl. Our presence makes them uncomfortable.
And so they have perverted the “justice” system to serve their
purpose. And they're getting away with it.

Or are they? Every time they have a
success of the sort cited above, every time they gloat and smirk
publicly about such a victory over heterosexual White males, the
hatred against them builds, the burning desire to tear out their
throats and smash their heads grows.

Which brings us back to sex again.
Heterosexual White males who used to know instinctively what to do
when a Black attacked them with a brick also used to know
instinctively how to behave when they wanted a mate-or even the
temporary company of a woman. The changing of all the rules to suit
feminist and Jewish notions of “equality” has confused many of
them.

Most of us, to be sure, have learned to
adapt. Whether we liked it or not, we learned the new etiquette. We
also learned that there still are old-fashioned, unreconstructed
women to be found-feminine rather than feminist women-if one knows
where to look for them. But they definitely are scarcer than they
used to be, and the fellows who have a harder time adapting to
unnatural conditions have suffered accordingly. There's hardly
anything to make a man angrier than depriving him of a woman's
company for an extended period.

So here's what it all boils down to:
the war between the Clinton constituency and the rest of us heating
up. Astute observers have been commenting for years on the “culture
war” raging in America. It was a war between those on one side who
believe that children should be raised in a disciplined environment
and have old-fashioned values instilled in them, and those on the
other side who believe that all any child needs is a big dose of
“multiculturalism” via MTV every day.

The folks on the old-fashioned side
were fighting with one hand tied behind their backs, though, because
they were careful never to admit even to themselves that the “culture
war” is really a race war: that what makes MTV so elementally evil
is that it is Jewish, that it is the fiendishly crafted instrument of
the sinister Jewish billionaire Sumner Redstone. They railed against
“multiculturalism,” but they retreated in embarrassment when the
multiculturalists charged them with “racism.”

So obviously the Clintonistas were
winning, and the rest of us were losing. One easy triumph after
another caused the Clinton constituency to throw caution to the winds
and to push ahead more rapidly and more brazenly. Homosexuals,
radical feminists, and Blacks were brought into more policy-making
positions in the government than ever before. Jews came out from
behind the scenes and assumed more visible positions of power: on the
Supreme Court, in the Cabinet, and as movers and shakers in the
Congress. Military leaders who were considered insufficiently
“sensitive” were canned.

The Jews defined a new category of
crime-”hate crime”-and got the government to go along. The
Politically Correct elitists announced that the Constitution is
obsolete, and the government decided to prove it by making bloody
examples of dissidents, first shooting in cold blood the wife and
child of a White separatist at Ruby Ridge and then burning to death
nearly a hundred Second Amendment dissidents at Waco.

All of this became a mite too much for
us unsensitized heterosexual White males. We decided to make
ourselves heard, and we began speaking out more loudly than before.
We began using the Internet, and we began making radio broadcasts on
those few stations not yet under Jewish control. And a few crazies
among us did some wild and stupid things: shooting abortion doctors,
bombing a government building, shooting up the White House.

The Clinton constituency responded by
announcing the need to silence dissident voices: specifically, to
keep Politically Incorrect messages off the Internet and Politically
Incorrect radio programs off the airwaves.

Actually, this response was only the
unveiling of a small part of a scheme on which they had been laboring
for years. The Jews want in the United States the same sort of laws
they had succeeded in forcing on the populations of Canada, the
United Kingdom, Germany, Switzerland, Belgium, Denmark, and a dozen
other White countries, where it is now illegal for Whites to dispute
the Jewish version of history or to criticize Jewish efforts to
“multiculturalize” their people. They had succeeded in
introducing codes of Politically Correct expression at most
universities, in many of the larger corporations, and in the
government itself, but they were still wondering how they could put
real teeth into these codes by criminalizing what they cleverly refer
to as “hate speech” when the Oklahoma City bombers presented them
with a golden opportunity. Now they're trying to make the most of it.

It remains to be seen how successful
they will be. If they do succeed even partly in their efforts to
scuttle the Bill of Rights-even if all they're able to do is knock
another brick or two out of the Second Amendment and close down a few
Politically Incorrect broadcasters-I believe they'll get a response
from us Stone Age types which will make everything which has happened
so far seem like a church social.

And I believe that they will be at
least that successful. Certainly, free speech has never been truly
popular. Joe and Jill Sixpack have never understood why anyone should
be permitted to write or say things that offend conventional people.
During the 1960s, when the Jews were offending a great many
conventional people through their “counterculture” campaign, the
freedom to shout obscenities and preach treason was zealously
promoted by their trendy collaborators in the cultural, academic, and
media establishments. That era is far behind us now, however, and the
same trendy collaborators are warning everyone that we really must
outlaw “hate speech.”

That'll be another step for them in the
division of our people. Many people on our side who're near the
middle now will be pulled far out toward the extreme. This
radicalization will make us stronger.

The authoritarian types will remain
where they are for the most part, on the other side near the middle,
supporting “our President” and “our government” as
self-righteously as ever. About the only ones we can expect to cross
over to us in substantial numbers are those whose oxen are gored by
changes. Fortunately, more and more oxen will be gored, as the Jews
rush to cram everything they can down our throats while they still
have a grip on the situation.

In particular, their continuing drive
to usher in the New World Order as soon as possible, with its
attendant deindustrialization of America and the proletarianization
of the White middle class, will force many to take a position with us
who would have preferred to remain squarely on the fence. We should
be thankful that the Jews' campaign for the division and destruction
of our people is committed to a number of fronts simultaneously, and
they cannot easily pull back on one while pushing forward on another.

************************

Thus, even
as the division of our people continues, new unions will be formed.

By the
time the shooting begins in earnest things almost certainly

will not
be divided along the lines we would prefer. What we must strive

for now is
to ensure that those on our side of the division will

be able to
win.

************************

In our effort to defeat their campaign
we may find ourselves allied with many people whom in the past we
barely tolerated: the religious zealots of the Christian right, the
essentially conservative types who have been gravitating toward the
militias, the wild and undisciplined young White people in our cities
who had nowhere to turn but to the skinhead movement when they were
abandoned by our “multicultural” society, libertarians who
finally are waking up to the fact that if they are to preserve any
liberty at all they may have to compromise their individualism
temporarily, perhaps even a few authoritarians from the military and
police establishments who have overdosed on Clintonism.

Thus, even as the division of our
people continues, new unions will be formed. By the time the shooting
begins in earnest things almost certainly will not be divided along
the lines we would prefer. What we must strive for now is to ensure
that those on our side of the division will be able to win.

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

From National Vanguard magazine, Issue No 104, March-April 1985:How Israel Gets a Free LunchThy gates shall be open continually...that men may bring unto thee the wealth of the Gentiles... --Isaiah 60:11

Jews are ingenious people, especially where money is concerned, and their financial ingenuity is nowhere more evident than in Israel. Consider: Whenever the Israeli government runs low on money (which is all the time), the minister of finance merely turns on the printing presses and prints as many more shekels as the government needs. No other government in the world is clever enough to finance itself in such an easy way.

Of course, there are a few little kinks in the Israeli method; for one thing, it causes an astronomical inflation, which has been bouncing around between a 400 per cent and 1,300 per cent annual rate for the past couple of years. In April the rate was 740 per cent.

The Israeli government has tried other methods of paying its bills: income taxes, for example. But Israel is a nation of tax evaders, and they are so clever at concealing income and assets that not even Jewish tax collectors have had much luck at making them pay what they owe. Nevertheless, the Israeli treasury is able to keep 400,000 government employees on the payroll; that's 30 per cent of the 1.34 million-strong Israeli workforce, a much higher proportion of government employees than in any other country on this side of the Iron Curtain.

Israel has the largest per capita foreign debt of any nation, by far; and also the world's largest per capita trade deficit: currently more than $5 billion per year.

Everyone agrees that the Israeli economy is an unmitigated disaster. And yet... the Israeli standard of living continues to rise; it climbed another 6 per cent in 1984. Despite the staggering inflation and trade deficit, Israelis are on a buying binge: home appliances, luxury automobiles, jewelry, foreign travel.

When inflation soars in Canada, Germany, the United States, or Poland -- when one of those countries cannot export enough of its goods to pay for what it must import -- then the people suffer; they must pull in their belts, reduce their consumption, and work harder in order to survive.

Why is it different for Israel? How are the Jews able to defy all the laws of economics with impunity?

***********************...[T]he divinely ordained function of the Gentiles (goyim) is to provide wealth for the Jews.***********************

The answer is no secret at all: Israelis are getting a free lunch, because they have persuaded the Gentile world to pick up the tab for them. Hymie Goldblatt in Tel Aviv is able to buy himself a new Mercedes and take his family on a vacation abroad, because Dick Smith's family in Kansas City is coughing up the tax money to pay for those things.

The Israelis are receiving $3.4 billion from the U.S. Treasury this year: $1.4 billion in military aid, $1.2 billion in "regular" economic aid, and a "special" $800 million economic aid supplement. That's all in outright gifts, not loans. In addition, American Jews are sending over another $1.5 billion in tax exempt personal donations, which effectively robs the U.S. Treasury of $700 billion in lost taxes. It all adds up to about a $5,000 annual bonus per Israeli family of four. And that doesn't count a number of other handouts Israel manages to finagle from the U.S. government -- such as a recent grant to pay for the recent resettlement of Ethiopian Jews -- or the hundreds of millions of dollars in "guilt" money extorted from West Germany each year.

Next year the toll on the U.S. Treasury will be substantially higher. Already approved by Congress and the Reagan administration for 1986 are $1.8 billion in military aid around $1.9 billion in economic aid -- both as non-repayable grants.

If the pattern of previous years is followed, however, before the year is over the Israelis will discover various additional needs, costing hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars more. Then they will ask the U.S. government for the additional money, and the government will give it to them. That's essentially the way it was with the $1.5 billion in supplementary aid for 1986 and 1986 which Congress has just voted for them.

The Reagan administration had been dragging its feet on the request for the additional $1.5 billion, telling the Israelis that they should take steps to straighten out their economy instead of always asking for more American aid when they couldn't pay their bills. The Israelis had responded with a transparent pretense of attempting to produce economic reforms, but no one was fooled by the charade; no genuine reforms, no more money, Secretary of State Schultz told the Jews in a rare effort at firmness (which didn't fool anyone either).

************************ "Thou shalt also suck the milk of the Gentiles." (Isaiah 60:16)************************

Then came Mr. Reagan's April announcement of his intention to lay a wreath in the military cemetery at Bitburg, Germany, followed by an orchestrated wailing about the "Holocaust" from Jewish groups. At the height of the wailing the White House caved in and approved the additional $1.5 billion in aid, with only a promise from Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres that he will tackle the problem of reforming his country's economy soon. In any event, the sort of "reforms" Mr. Peres has in mind are only cosmetic: an increase of 2 percent in Israel's value-added tax; a doubling of the tax on vacations abroad from $150 to $300; an increase in the sales tax on imported luxury items to 20 per cent.

The reason no knowledgeable observer believes that the Israelis will make any serious effort to get their finances out of the red is that they can do so only by reducing their standard of living. And why should Hymie Goldblatt deny himself the good things in life, so long as Dick Smith can be compelled to pay the bill?

The religious Jews -- the ones who take the "prophecies" and other pronouncements of the Old Testament seriously -- consider sponging off the rest of the world to be the God-given right of the Jews.1 And the secular Jews know that, so long as they can keep making the Gentile world feel guilty for the "Holocaust," they can keep gouging the suckers for more money.2

Of course, maintaining a tight grip on the Gentile world's news and entertainment media help the Jews keep the goyim in a giving mood; at least, it keeps the Gentile politicians ready to jump every time the Jews whistle. Even if Dick Smith isn't willing to help Hymie Goldblatt pay for a new Mercedes, the President, his congressman, and both his senators are more than willing to take it out of his taxes anyway; they are more afraid of incurring the wrath of the Jews than they are of losing Dick Smith's vote.

Just to keep the politicians on their toes, though, the Israelis have issued a new threat: If the Reagan administration forces the Peres administration to make any substantial reductions in the Israeli standard of living, the Israeli voters will replace Shimon Peres with Ariel Sharon as the new Prime Minister. The mere thought of having to deal with Sharon -- the ultra-arrogant, bloody-handed "Butcher of Beirut" -- gives Mr. Reagan and his aides nightmares. Sharon, on the other hand, relishes the prospect of being able to kick Gentile butts in Washington, and he criticizes Peres and the other members of the present Israeli government for not taking a tough enough line with the United States. "Unfortunately," he recently said of his colleagues, "they don't know how to face the goyim."

So long as the goyim remain such patsies, however -- plundered and betrayed by their own government, intimidated by the lie of the "Holocaust," with insufficient gumption to wrest control of their own news and entertainment industry away from its present masters, bemused by the philo-Semitic propaganda of the Judeo-Christian churches -- even the mild-mannered Peres should be able to guarantee that Israel will continue to get a free lunch, and that Dick Smith will have to pay for Hymie Goldblatt's Mercedes.
_________________________________

1 At the very core of Judaism is the belief that the Jews were chosen by their deity, Yahweh, to inherit the earth and all its wealth, without having to work for it. Religious Jews believe they have a covenant with Yahweh: if the Jews obey all of the commandments he has given them, then "the Lord thy God shall...give thee great and goodly cities, which thou buildedst not, and houses full of all good things, which thou filledst not, and wells digged, which thou diggedst not, and vineyards and olive trees, which thou plantedst not...(Deuteronomy 6:10-11)

The Old Testament "prophets" are not at all bashful in reminding their fellow Jews that the divinely ordained function of the Gentiles (goyim) is to provide wealth for the Jews. Thus, "Thou shalt also suck the milk of the Gentiles." (Isaiah 60:16)

2 Although the actual number of Jews killed by the Germans during the Second World War was probably less than a million (and most of those lost their lives either by being summarily shot or by catching typhus in the concentration camps in the last months of the war, not by being "gassed"), if one accepts the claimed figure of 6,000,000 victims, then it is easy to calculate that Israel currently is collecting more than $500 in sympathy money per dead Jew per year from the Gentile world.