But once again I have to ask. If Aliens have managed to developp a civilisation that can create transport capable of bringing themlight years acros
heaven knows how many universes, why would they travel all that far just to make pretty pictures in cereal fields?

Do you doubt their competence to communicate by either radio or TV or even morse come to that as, if they exist they would have been monitoring us for
many years.? If so you dont have a very high regard for them.

This is not called contact, this is called painting a graffiti on neighbor's wall and running away. Either those aliens are kids or they really
don't know any other way to say things other than drawing pictures in fields.

This particular crop circle is very interesting though and remains one of the best.

IMO, using the argument that complex designs cannot be made by men is not effective, because that can be done. Difficult but possible. A good argument
is to question the motives. Here is a quiz -

Ok I stand corrected, men can, and obviously do produce these circles. I must say the math chart in the middle of the field looked fake to me, but the
shape of the circles and such did look very similar to alot of other circles.The video Alien Sign shows alot of evidence that the formations are
beyond ordinary. I saw a 1700s woodcut of a devil making a circle in a field. I cant remember where I saw it though.

I get your point. The Arecibo reply is indeed very complex and intelligent. I agree that common people don't know about DNA variants and even Arecibo
message itself. If it is man made, the person who made this design must be very knowledgeable. Generally people of this caliber don't do hoaxes, so
this crop circle has some weight.

Still, I think its not a conclusive proof. It turns out that there is nothing in the design that we did not know before, no new piece of knowledge
that no one knew. Even the 'alien transmitter' is a copy of a previously known crop circle.

A conclusive proof would be when a crop circle shows something which is not known to humanity and can be verified after the crop circle reveals it.
For example if a crop circle shows a picture of AIDS virus and alongside a chemical structure, and if we prepare that chemical and its found that it
can cure the disease caused by that virus and that the cure was unknown, this will conclusively prove that the crop circle was made by someone not
from this planet.

There is plenty of evidence to show that not all crop circles are man-made. The real ones leave some kind of energy behind and the stocks of the wheat
are broken down, not pushed. Investigators found evidence that the stalks were subjected to enough heat or an energy to burst the lower nodes and
making them fall on their own weight. Among other finding..

Showing that man CAN make Crop Circles ONCE is all it takes to cast doubt on all circles..I'll give you that..BUT in this case the size scope and
complexity along with the specific placement of information contained points in another direction..IF YOU BOTHERED to READ THE LINK and I know its
long BUT ITS WELL WRITTEN..skeptical even..you would know . Debunking is about facts...not about simple declarative statements and refutations
unsupported by argument or evidence. My own standard of proof is quite simply a daylight landing on the Whitehouse lawn, Russian Kremlin, London
Houses of Parliment..etc..in full public view. This particular GLYPH is interesting , worthy of note because of the apparent REPLY to a 1974 message
we sent. Should they have replied in a radio transmission? Not if they are all ready here! The fact of the matter is this.. THE US and UK Governments
know the truth..elements around the world know also... I know too only too well that THEY the EBE's are real. An enlightened view of the Multiverse
demands life in every corner of space..sooner rather than later every person on this planet will made aware a bell once chimed can not be unrung..

I also thought we have recently discovered, that there are more than just nine planets in our solar system? I suppose you can argue what the correct
definition of a planet is but, I believe we have more than just nine.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.