Welcome to the Consumerist Archives

Thanks for visiting Consumerist.com. As of October 2017, Consumerist is no longer producing new content, but feel free to browse through our archives. Here you can find 12 years worth of articles on everything from how to avoid dodgy scams to writing an effective complaint letter. Check out some of our greatest hits below, explore the categories listed on the left-hand side of the page, or head to CR.org for ratings, reviews, and consumer news.

Perennial buzzkills at the Center for Science in the Public Interest have decided to set their sights on McDonald’s, issuing the fast food giant an ultimatum: Stop putting toys in their Happy Meals in the next 30 days or face a lawsuit.

Tempting kids with toys is unfair and deceptive, both to kids who don’t understand the concept of advertising, and to their parents, who have to put up with their nagging children.

The CSPI’s lawyer calls McDonald’s time-honored practice of using toys and other colorful plastic doodads to entice young children to buy Happy Meals “creepy and predatory” which he feels warrants an injunction.

“McDonald’s practice of dangling toys in front of children is illegal, regardless of what meal the child eventually gets,” the lawyer wrote in a letter sent yesterday to McDonald’s executives. “Not only does the practice mobilize ‘pester power,’ but it also imprints on developing minds brand loyalty for McDonald’s.”

Not surprisingly, McDonald’s isn’t taking this very seriously.

“Getting a toy is just one part of a fun, family experience at McDonald’s,” said a spokesman for the Golden Arches.

As someone who wouldn’t eat McDonald’s hamburgers when I was a youngster, I can honestly attest that a toy-filled Happy Meal was the only way I would agree to eat at McDonald’s with my less discerning older siblings. So my 5-year-old self would not be pleased with the idea of ditching them.

What about you parents out there? How do you see your children reacting to a Happy Meal that contains no prize?