Surviving The Assault on Private Sector Careers in America

The Political Soul of a RINO!

The left wing media is trying to talk up a division between Tea Party republicans and RINO’s (Republican In Name Only). I’m not a big fan of RINO’s, but I’d rather have Scott Brown as my senator than Ted Kennedy. The fact is, there are 10-20 states where you can either have a RINO or a liberal; I happen to live in both of them.

In 2006, I supported the election of Arnold Schwarzenegger for Governor; in fact, Sue and I manned phone banks in Palm Desert and met with Mary Bono the day before election day.

Anyway, since then, many of my conservative friends have labeled Arnold as a RINO. Perhaps so, but I think you need to walk a mile in his shoes before you throw him under the bus (how many points do I get for using two worn out cliche’s in the same sentence).

Earlier this week, The Governator wrote a story in the Wall Street Journal (Public Pensions and Our Fiscal Future) that very accurately paints the picture of how big a mess California is in and provides some insight to his political soul.

Give it a read!

Public Pensions and Our Fiscal Future

Few Californians in the private sector have $1 million in savings, but that’s effectively the retirement account they guarantee to many government employees.

By ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER

Recently some critics have accused me of bullying state employees. Headlines in California papers this month have been screaming “Gov assails state workers” and “Schwarzenegger threatens state workers.”

I’m doing no such thing. State employees are hard-working and valuable contributors to our society. But here’s the plain truth: California simply cannot solve its budgetary problems without addressing government-employee compensation and benefits.

As former Speaker of the State Assembly and San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown pointed out earlier this year in the San Francisco Chronicle, roughly 80 cents of every government dollar in California goes to employee compensation and benefits. Those costs have been rising fast. Spending on California’s state employees over the past decade rose at nearly three times the rate our revenues grew, crowding out programs of great importance to our citizens. Neglected priorities include higher education, environmental protection, parks and recreation, and more.

Much bigger increases in employee costs are on the horizon. Thanks to huge unfunded pension and retirement health-care promises granted by past governments, and also to deceptive pension-fund accounting that understated liabilities and overstated future investment returns, California is now saddled with $550 billion of retirement debt.

The cost of servicing that debt has grown at a rate of more than 15% annually over the last decade. This year, retirement benefits—more than $6 billion—will exceed what the state is spending on higher education. Next year, retirement costs will rise another 15%. In fact, they are destined to grow so much faster than state revenues that they threaten to suck up the money for every other program in the state budget. (See the nearby chart.)

I’ve held a stricter line on government employment and salary increases than any governor in the modern era (overall year-to-year spending has increased just 1.4% on my watch). Nevertheless, employee costs will keep marching upwards because of pension promises, and they will never stop doing so until we get reform.

At the same time that government-employee costs have been climbing, the private-sector workers whose taxes pay for them have been hurting. Since 2007, one million private jobs have been lost in California. Median incomes of workers in the state’s private sector have stagnated for more than a decade. To make matters worse, the retirement accounts of those workers in California have declined. The average 401(k) is down nationally nearly 20% since 2007. Meanwhile, the defined benefit retirement plans of government employees—for which private-sector workers are on the hook—have risen in value.

Few Californians in the private sector have $1 million in savings, but that’s effectively the retirement account they guarantee to public employees who opt to retire at age 55 and are entitled to a monthly, inflation-protected check of $3,000 for the rest of their lives.

In 2003, just before I became governor, the state assembly even passed a law permitting government employees to purchase additional taxpayer-guaranteed, high-yielding retirement annuities at a discount—adding even more retirement debt. It’s as if Sacramento legislators don’t want a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, but a government of the employees, by the employees, and for the employees.

For years I’ve asked state legislators to stop adding to retirement debt. They have refused. Now the Democratic leadership of the assembly proposes to raise the tax and debt burdens on private employees in order to cover rising public-employee compensation.

But what will they do next year when those compensation costs grow 15% more? And the year after that when they’ve risen again? And 10 years from now, when retirement costs have reached nearly $30 billion per year? That’s where government-employee retirement costs are headed even with the pension reforms I’m demanding. Imagine where they’re headed without reform.

My view is different. We must not raise taxes or borrow money to cover up fundamental problems.

Much needs to be done. The Assembly needs to reverse the massive and retroactive increase in pension formulas it enacted 11 years ago. It also needs to prohibit “spiking”—giving someone a big raise in his last year of work so his pension is boosted. Government employees must be required to increase their contributions to pensions. Public pension funds must make truthful financial disclosures to the public as to the size of their liabilities, and they must use reasonable projected rates of returns on their investments. The legislature could pass those reforms in five minutes, the same amount of time it took them to pass that massive pension boost 11 years ago that adds additional costs every single day they refuse to act.

And after they’ve finished passing those reforms, they could take another five minutes to pass legislation terminating the annuity give-away they passed in 2003 and ending the immoral practice of pension fund board members accepting gifts or even campaign contributions from lobbyists, salesmen, unions and other special interests.

Reforming government employee compensation and benefits won’t close this year’s deficit. It will, however, protect the next generation of Californians from overwhelming burdens. The same is true with respect to the other reform I’m demanding—the establishment of a rainy-day fund so that legislators can’t spend temporary revenue windfalls.

All of these reforms must be in place before I will sign a budget.

I am under no illusion about the difficulty of my task. Government-employee unions are the most powerful political forces in our state and largely control Democratic legislators. But for the future of our state, no task is more important.

Advertisements

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

6 Responses

Soul or not, I fault him for doing too little to educate the electorate and doing it too late. (Just one cliche, but beggars can’t be choosers.)
We beat down one tax increase last year but largely did it without his help.
Speaking of RINO’s, your Mary Bono sighting must have been one of the last. We (the Tea Party group) tried to get her out of her office in August and meet with those of us who elected her. No luck. She closeted herself away from us. Disdain is the word that comes to mind. Remember, she voted Cap and Tax out of committee.
So there are two choices in November. 1) Vote for Mary or 2) Don’t vote, which is a vote for her very liberal opponent. I still haven’t figured out what I’m going to do. Maybe Costa Rica?

Well I’ve lived in the peoples republic of Kalifornia for over 23 years, and I gotta tell you this place is headed down hill faster than Peekaboo Street.

Arnie had great ideas, and I supported him too. What we didn’t do when we got rid of Davis was remove the real problem in the state. The uber liberal legislature. And it doesn’t matter WHO is Governor without that change it is an impossible task to fix this state.

Gun regulations, over taxing, anti-business, a lack of illegal immigration controls and ridiculous state government intrusion has taken this state from paradise to hell and I can’t wait to be able to move out of here.

Where CA goes so does the nation. Or does it. We need to slash the federal government by 50% and return to a republic form of government. Federalism will work. States will learn from each other. States will compete with each other. The states that work will survive the ones that make big mistakes like CA will fail. This is only hope.

The left wing media and the Tea Party(s) could keep us from winning big in November… The problem is the Tea Party isn’t one group with one clean (easy to repeat) message, they are like my 2 yorkie terriers — they will bark at anything friend or foe. While there are many, many real issues that need to be fixed we cannot chase our tail on each and every one of them between now and November and win. We need 2 or 3 easy to remember and talk about messages (jobs, debt, borders) pick three, any three and ignore the rest., even if they matter. The left wing has figured out they can get us spinning easily on every issues, while all of these issues matter, in some cases a lot, we need to ignore them until after the election. This week the left wing dropped the “is Obama a Muslim?”, 2 weeks ago it was anchor babies, 2 weeks before that it was gay marriage. I think they are doing it on purpose to keep us off message and on issues that drive voters away. And RINOs are better than liberals any day.

I think the message of the Tea Party IS 2 or 3 issues. It’s not about gay marriage or burning the koran that’s for sure. Those are individuals issues and they need to deal with them separate from the tea party. The tea party is about limited Gov. Fewer regulations, national security and the return the basic principles that made America Great. What we have now and have had since 2004 is an expansive Gov. runaway spending, over regulation and LESS national security.

All the other stuff is media hype and distraction. the 500k at the mall last Saturday, was a turning point. I think as long as we stay on message, and get these RINO’s to al the very least back those 3 or 4 basic issues with their actions, we will return to greatness and shut these liberal/progressive idiots down.

I agree, but back to Dave’s point. The liberal media is trying to drag everyone into the mud. If it’s not the tea party, then conservative media needs stop taking the bait, they allowed the liberal media to kill an entire week on “is Obama a Christian or not ?”. We only have 8-10 weeks left before the election. We need to focus on Job, less government or debt and defense. That it… We need to win in November to stop the bleeding and then win the White House back 2 years after that