Lord Monckton, Southlanders Respond

Lord Monckton recently graced Invercargill with his lordly presence, and from what I hear, impressed some who are convinced that the world's scientific community are complicit in a huge conspiracy.

Local reporter Michael Fallow interviewed the Lord (sadly, I can't find a link) and wrote a lengthy piece for the Southland Times. He tried to make sense of Monckton's "dense answers" and references to classical philosophers and medieval scholars.

Despite his lordly bearing and his extravagant use of a gaudy coat of arms, Monckton claims to speak for the "working farmers, fishermen, miners and others...". He also describes the media's printing of the broadly accepted scientific view on climate change as "following the Communist party line on this" (his past labeling of young environmentalists as "Hitler youth" is another example of how he regards those who challenge his flamboyant claims).

Fallow provided a link to Monckton's primary website that promotes the views of climate sceptics but he didn't refer to a single site that provided a counter view. He suggests that "Criticisms of his writing, methodology, integrity, qualifications, lineage and more can be found anywhere you care to look. Googling 'Monckton myths' is a start."

My favourite response to Monckton's visit was a letter from retired forester, John Purey-Cust, his wisdom and wry humour clearly put all sceptics in their place. I couldn't find an immediate link but his letter was the lead one in the Southland Times today and was accompanied by the image below. I have transcribed the letter in full.

WE SHOULD DO WHAT IT TAKES TO PROTECT PLANET

A small quibble. What we discuss is climate change, a rather different and more complex thing than global warming.

A while ago, about the time of the moon landings and since, we were shown many shots of our planet Earth taken from the blackness of space.

There it was, many hued and so different from the stark dead lunar landscape, and we could see the thin skin of atmosphere, which makes that difference possible.

Our atmosphere protects us from the destructive energy of our Sun, regulating temperature and fueling life. Common sense says monkey with it at our peril, change it, upset it and things won't go too well for us.

We have already had one go. Remember the ozone hole scare when escaped refrigerating chemicals began eating up the atmospheric ozone layer which protects us from cosmic rays?

Sceptics at the time roared with laughter, scientists (and in this case, politicians, too) took things seriously, the offending chemicals were banned by international treaty and replaced with something else, and the ozone hole shrinks.

Now we look at images of a dead Mars, and hear the question asked: Did it too once have life of its own (and an Allison and a Monckton also, perhaps)?

Popular posts from this blog

The latest Unicef report has us languishing at the bottom of the developed world in relation to the health and welfare our children and youth. This report was based on the data our government collects and concerningly, with regards to child poverty, a ranking wasn't provided because of a refusal to follow standard practice (an admission of failure?). In many documented areas we are seriously neglecting our young people (ranking numbers are determined by the data provided from a maximum of 41 developed countries):Child Poverty (41/41?) I consider that we must be by far the worst in the developed world for child poverty when the Government refuses to use the same measures as other countries so that we can be ranked. Our Children's Commissioner and the Child Poverty Monitor currently state that 14% of our children suffer from material hardship. We have a much higher threshold to determine this and require 7 elements to recognise hardship, while most other countries use only two.…

Mark Richardson, a former New Zealand cricketer and media personality, has made a valuable contribution by asking the "frilly undie crowd" to "shut up listen" to his latest attempt at mansplaining motherhood and parenting.

Richardson acknowledged that it was hard work but had the view that it is simply a fact of life and what we have to do, but can't be considered a job.

I can understand his flawed reasoning that being a mum does not fit the normal definitions of a job: there is no formal employment process to take it on; no job description provided; no agreement to sign; no holidays or sick days provided and it certainly isn't automatically paid. However, by not viewing it as a job and a hugely valuable one at that, it has meant that it has little status or recognition. There is no training or qualifications needed to be a mother and it generally isn't considered useful to include on a CV under 'wor…

Given the city's relatively static population the National Government chose Invercargill as one of the cities to lead its state housing asset sell off in 2015. In the 1980s the region had over 800 state houses and after continuous divestment, the remaining 360 were to be sold to a private or NGO social housing provider. At that time only a handful of people in Invercargill were on Housin…