Pages

Sunday, December 24, 2017

If you read a white nationalist publication like counter-currents, often the argument is that they are providing the “truth” on their side. This truth is based upon objective and grounded reality. This can range from race studies, classical philosophy, and The Bell Curve.

What makes white nationalism and the Alt-Right so appealing to our generation, is not only that it is anti-liberal in nature, but it offers Sargon-of-Akkad-tier arguments for the truth which millennials have been fogged over by the boomers. Once someone goes 1488, they can never switch back over to a Marxist ideology. Why is that? Because truth is on the white nationalist side.

Marxist have created a utopian dream society that can only be realized through social engineering and propaganda. In other words, there is a trans humanist war against the natural world. Marxists are rebelling against mother nature, and ethnonationalists are trying to find commune within nature (creating a “human bio-diversity” future and Martin Heidegger style socialism).

This spiritual war is between two parties. Yet, the argument is twofold. Ethnonationalists believe you should come to their side because they have the truth, while Marxist believe we should fight against all forms of oppression and create the selfish society we want to live in as individuals.

…Both unfortunately seem to be wrong.

Marxists are wrong for many reasons, but white nationalists are wrong for assuming radical honesty is the answer. There is nothing wrong with being honest. In fact, I hate people who are inauthentic and hypocritical, even those who show one drop of it. What white nationalists do not understand is that youth is a motivator for truth.

Often drug-addicted and perverted nazis will say that “youth is a folly and everything I learned from my cultural Marxist professors was wrong. If only I had been more ‘based’ and became a Traditionalist I would have found greater meaning in life.” Millennials, now hitting their mid 20s, are going through something similar.

Liberals tend to call this “woke,” while the Alt-Right says its taking the “red pill.” (Personally, I believe these coming-to-age terminologies are postmodern in nature and divide the individual with irony and eclecticism). Youth was only a “phase” for them and nothing special. It was the loss of innocence handed over to guilt created the complex scientist-playing-god adult. Right?

I am very skeptical (and have intense hatred) for the individual who claims they are an “adult” now. (Because they drink beer, smoke cigarettes, work a full-tine job, use tinder for inane and disgusting one night stands, do drugs at “parties,” swear like a sailor, while upholding that they are someone the descendent of Socrates).

Religion has proven throughout time that humanity needs to build civilization in order to go forward. That means morals and ethics must be enforced. A true man against the kali yuga role-plays the Christ figure. Someone must become a martyr in order to show this decadent world there is hope in humanity. I am strong advocate of Rene Girard’s philosophy.

“Adultism" runs rampant in society by those who are irresponsible. “When you’re 30, you will realize there is more to life than partying!” (ironically said by someone who did those same things), and “I am 22 years old and I can work at Apple!” (said by someone who lacks experience and is full of arrogance).

Life is an ongoing journey through wisdom and knowledge, and any healthy human being should grow, not die, as they age. Faulty conclusions are reached at certain points, such as the The Asian Feminist Fallacy. Or that the adult is still a kid trapped inside a grown-up body. It should be a priority for every human being to contribute towards society and create a greater civilization for future generations.

…But all of this I have just written… is any of it grounded in “truth?” It sounds like it. But what if one does something different to achieve a greater society, like through Asian-Aryanism or Marxism? A white nationalist would argue that both are living in a dream bubble. That a magazine like Cosmopolitan sells dreams. And now pornography controls our sexuality.

In 2017, we live in a society behind computer screens and communicate writing digital letters. We use virtual avatars to represent ourselves and play video games for fun. The outside world is becoming bleak and darker, as the white people who consume in this technology run away from the nature of the world. Technology progresses and the population is booming. The western world is becoming “Asianized.”

All of this is a fantasy, yet in practical terms, it is becoming a reality. White nationalists argue that by reversing such trends, whites could find the Heidegger-style “truth” and make rational, Christian choice. White men would then choose white women simply because “it’s for the greater good.” Again, where is this greater good if everyone is already enjoying watching anime and watching Lauren Rose videos?

For all the white people that end up reproducing with other white people, they will have to grow another generation of “racially aware” whites, preferring them over the seething masses of nonwhites. (maybe something like The Node will happen). This hyper-conscious attempt to uphold society is based upon anxiety and racial duty. And white nationalism will continue to argue that it is based upon the “truth.” In other words, if you can imagine the philosophy of Martin Heidegger becoming a movement, it would be ethnonationalism.

That is not to say Martin Heidegger is wrong. But the radical attempts to try and box people away from their own freedom of association is wrong. White people have an amazing trait to go beyond the limit of mother nature, and in doing so, they wish to create something much greater in life. White people have created rockets to the moon and modern forms of art.

In a bleak world full of nonwhites, white people will not be there to create the progressing future. It’s why I subscribe to ethnonationalism. But at the same time, ultimately, I am a eurasian futurist. I am an anti-liberal at heart trying to find the right system that will cause the least conflict and make every person on earth happy.

A communist country can exist over there, and a Spencer all-white-utopia down there. But I would like to live in that hip place over there, that has all the whites, Asians, and Eurasians living together in harmony. That is ethnonationalism in a nutshell.

And still, there are Nazis who claim that any form of coexistence and biculturalism is wrong and not based upon “truth.” If they had it their way, they would eliminate the future possibility of a bicultural or mixed-race person. Either they are “red” or they are “blue.”

Truth does exist. We often have fantasies about our future. We can make our dreams become a reality if we work hard to achieve them. Most normies live in fantasies they learn from watching television and browsing the internet. Obviously if someone is “gay,” 30% of the country must be gay too! And if Enid from OK KO: Let’s Be Friends is a black, purple haired ninja girl, well, there must be a person like her in this world.

René Girard argued that life is about the mimic throes. People desire what other people want. “If he has an Asian girlfriend, then I want an Asian girlfriend too!”

Is it bad life is based upon envy, jealously, and dreams to escape reality? There are negative consequences that a smart person must realize in order to overcome. But desires don’t change.

I know too many white nationalists that once had Asian girlfriends in their youth (and had sex with them), only then to “grow up” and say “I’m into traditionalist white girls now and the alt-right is the future.” This is a great example of hypocrisy, inauthenticity, and stupidity.

People who do this are denying their true nature. They are running away from their true desires of life to pursue something that is artificial and not them. As Girard puts it, they take the life of someone else. Other symptoms, like depressions and lack of confidence might be a motivator of this action. But ultimately, I strongly believe it has to do with stupidity, adults, and true immaturity.

And these same people will tell you “truth” is on their side. Mind you, it’s a trick for hipster racism. Watch out. Realize its they who are misguided in life and sin by becoming too “edgy” for preening purposes.

If there was any truth to this, they want life to become like an anime.

The argument they make is the same Ryan Anderson makes in The Birth of Prudence. “Well, it has nothing to do with the fact that she is Asian, but, choosing white over Asian is the right thing to do.” I also assume Ryan is guilty of Asian-sexual desires. But he doubles down and pretends he’s doing the “right” thing. Why would you write a book in the first place?

To refute Asian-Aryanism? No. It’s about himself. This “truth” veneer is quite dangerous for most young people. It denies their desires and gives into “truth-nihilism.” A bleak system of “well it doesn’t accord with white nationalism, so I can’t truly respect this piece of art.”

Millennials are trying so hard to be unique. But in the end, they are still snowflakes. Just like me.

The argument which all White nationalists subscribe to is a one against race mixing. The far-right will often believe that there can be no bicultural or “third position” race. The argument follows that there can be only “White” or “Asian.” There simply cannot be a “Eurasian” one. The mixed race person (or something that isn’t mixed at all) must choose a team consisting of either red or blue. There is no purple team.

Greg Johnson of Counter-Currents will also extend the argument to include “people of some mixed Asian ancestry” in an all-white ethnostate. But that person cannot ultimately race mix further. This is an amnesty. There is amnesty for mixed race people and they have to choose a side. Hence I call this phenomenon the “amnesty argument.”

Debate or talk to anyone on the alt-right, and the argument is that mixed race people belong on THAT side, but not the white one. In a way, there is a society of high minded white aristocrat, and then a sweeping mass of brown degenerate people. How has this citation improved?

White nationalist claim to have truth on their side. But the actual truth is, they don’t have an answer for the other, simply because they don’t care about the other. Hipster racism has already infiltrated the alt-right, creating more plants like Lauren Rose and Tara McCarthy.

The Golden One explained in a video (I forget which one) that what the Cultural Marxist did to academia in 60s, is what the Alt-right will do in 2020. There is now Cultural Fascism. No one wants to debate it because it is the hip and edgy norm all the cool kids are gravitating towards. They take their ideology from already established white nationalist and reinvent for their poorly thought out high-school mentality of social signaling.

White millennials are being proselytized to become white nationalist, and will neglect the future for half-white people. Do these mixed people assert themselves as fellow white people? Or do they belong in the gas chamber? There is no answer.

I, however, assert that biculturalism is the answer. And for Whites and Asians, call it “Eurasianism” or “Asian Aryanism.”

In a future where neo-liberalism is doomed, ethnonationalism will eventually replace it. And when ethnonationalism does replace the PC-tyrannical Kalergi plan, ethnonationalism will advocate that all races belong back to their designated “homelands.” Basically, Zionism for all peoples.

If ethnonationalsim was to reach out to a larger audience, then it should be reach out to those who don’t belong to a 100% “white” or “Asian” side. There has to be an institution that advocates biculturalism. Such a place would be the size of an Amish community. It could be in an white or Asian ethnosate, but have its own control (like Taiwan ). Could such a place be envisioned?

This is what I have been arguing for. The Amnesty Argument is not enough to answer the events of the past century. We simply cannot forget past history and move forward. There is no white-nationalist janitor that cleans out the decadence of the past and everything is wonderfully fixed. Technology is growing, and will eliminate certain generation social norms and trends.

Transhumanism is an opponent against white nationalism. Asian-Aryanism is not transhumanist, but is ethnonationalist and bicultural. This a problem the alt-right must face, but clearly it is too busy watching and consuming Youtube drama.

The normie doesn’t want the arts. The normie wants to norm but also wants to be an individual. The alt-right is a collective party of white individuals who want to believe they are in a collective. A sad high school mentality that addresses nothing.

In the end, international capitalism will make profit off the alt-rights demands, and they will always be keyboard warriors consuming and being complacent. Like someone who watches info wars.

Normies hate eccentrics because they don’t understand them. They want the alt-right to control crazy behavior. The world would be simple if people were just red or blue. If only the truth was grounded on the reality of race and sexuality, things would be better.

But no one on the alt-right has an answer for the differences of race or sexuality. They claim it, and watch as they suck into the powers of Lauren Rose and admire anime.

This dangerous belief of “claiming to be based on the truth” is what motivates arrogance in the normie looking for attention.

Jim Goad, who is an ultimate skeptic and truth seeker, is not someone on the alt-right. He does his own thing. And does a good job at it. I would classify myself as a Goadian. It doesn’t mean I have to subscribe to a new world religion based upon ethnonationalism. What it means is that I fight against the hypocrisy of normal people, because quite frankly, I hate normies. I hate when normies try and disguise themselves to be like me, do I find them to be even more repulsive.

The amnesty argument is a one-dimensional argument for ideological normies. They don’t have answers. Just social signals.