Friday, January 20, 2012

The Guardian has an interesting story today about an open letter to the governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King. It has been signed by environmentalist groups, renewable energy representatives, politicians, academics, etc. See the letter here. The letter asks King to carefully consider the consequences of continuous institutional investment in fossil fuels. The signatories express concern that market reactions would not be swift enough should a depreciation of fossil fuel based companies occur. It is a call to improve the investment climate for renewable energy businesses to avoid 'systemic risk' which could stem from a crisis of fossil fuels.

In the Guardian story some additional information is presented to draw the parallel to the housing bubble and financial crisis. It states that international climate negotiations and the 2 degree limit would cause this to happen:

To me, it seems implausible to expect a climate treaty any time soon that would lead to a situation where we leave 80% of fossil fuels untouched, especially given the high prices and profitability of oil, the dash for shale gas, the resurrection of coal power plants in Germany and elsewhere, etc. I am not sure if the spin in the Guardian story helps the effort to redirect long term investment, as stated in the letter. Relying on wishful thinking and scaring people will not work. After all, there is a different conclusion Sir Melwyn might draw: if such a systemic risk exists, better protect fossil fuel interests.

1 comment:

A more probable scenario is that insolvent EU countries simply ignore EU climate rules causing the EU, which is the largest place for renewable investment, to fail leaving many low C02 emitting energy sources in the hands of companies that are doomed.

In the US subsidies that kept companies like Solyndra afloat are quite likely to be cut as well in efforts to trim the US budget deficit and because a Republican Congress will veto any more funding.

Who would bet that over the next 10 years low C02 emitting technology companies outperform oil companies?

Sustainable use of KLIMAZWIEBEL

The participants of KLIMAZWIEBEL are made of a diverse group of people interested in the climate issue; among them people, who consider the man-made climate change explanation as true, and others, who consider this explanation false. We have scientists and lay people; natural scientists and social scientists. People with different cultural and professional backgrounds. This is a unique resource for a relevant and inspiring discussion. This resource needs sustainable management by everybody. Therefore we ask to pay attention to these rules:

1. We do not want to see insults, ad hominem comments, lengthy tirades, ongoing repetitions, forms of disrespect to opponents. Also lengthy presentation of amateur-theories are not welcomed. When violating these rules, postings will be deleted.2. Please limit your contributions to the issues of the different threads.3. Please give your name or use an alias - comments from "anonymous" should be avoided.4. When you feel yourself provoked, please restrain from ranting; instead try to delay your response for a couple of hours, when your anger has evaporated somewhat.5. If you wan to submit a posting (begin a new thread), send it to either Eduardo Zorita or Hans von Storch - we publish it within short time. But please, only articles related to climate science and climate policy.6. Use whatever language you want. But maybe not a language which is rarely understood in Hamburg.