@smrgeoinfo
+1 to @makxdekkers
Remember that Paul Walk was objecting (mildly) to the definition of Standard in the text, not the use of dct:Standard.
But as others have said here, there will be folks who do not consider their all of their profiles to be "A basis for comparison; a reference point against which other things can be evaluated." In particular, I think that the "against which other things can be evaluated" is something that some folks will not associate with their profiles. Anyone can add an "rdf:type dct:Standard" to their RDF if they wish; it would be best not to bake this into PROF as it restricts the meaning of profile to that definition.
--
GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/792#issuecomment-473409150 using your GitHub account