Home Air Quality Solutions Research Paper

Part II: Home Indoor Air Quality Systems

Control Measures

Most home air quality experts and agencies ( EPA, 2012b) agree that there three basic strategies that might be taken to deal with indoor air quality issues:

Source control → A.I.R. strategy

Dilution control → Ventilation systems

Extraction control → Air cleaners

Source Control is the process of dealing with the air contaminants directly from its originating source. In this paper that process was evolved to the comprehensive A.I.R. strategy.

Dilution control is the process of diluting the concentration of the air contaminants by supplying additional clean air to the polluted space. Natural and mechanical ventilation systems are the most common way to achieve that strategy.

Extraction Control is the process of extracting the air contaminants by using filter media and other adsorbing4 or absorbing5 mediums. Air purifiers and air filtering plants are two common systems used in that sense.

Even though the triplet: Source control, Ventilation and Air cleaning are becoming a standard when it comes to categorizing the available IAQ measures, for this paper a new but similar categorization will be proposed that is based not in the typology of the control measure as its commonly done but instead in the effect of the control measure to the pollutants.

By using that new method we have just two main control categories: General and Source control.

General and Source control.

General Control measures do not specifically target a certain substance/pollutant but rather provide general treatment to the indoor air thus attracting a variety of contaminants. In that categorization we have ventilation systems, air cleaning plants and even air purifiers that target a variety of particulates and some occasions VOC gaseous pollutants.

Source Control instead focuses efforts in locating and treating a specific contaminant by dealing directly with its emitting source. In that categorization we have a variety of systems that differ according to the type of pollutant we have to deal, as table 2 suggests.

In this paper I will analyze those two main categories of pollution control, along with other systems that occur in the indoor air quality process such as pollutant monitoring methods and symptomatology tables.

I will also propose specific systems for each category based on minimum recommendations provided by the experts of each domain that can be found on the appendix. The proposed systems for each category have been further distinguished into several levels of controls, depending on the phase that the indoor air quality measure is taking place. Based on the selections of those systems I have developed a cost structure analysis that will be presented in depth at the latter pages of part 2 and at part 3 of this paper.

For the needs of the research I have distinguished the indoor air quality process into 4 time/incidence triggered phases:

Indoor Air Quality Processes

Phase 0: Beginning– all the home expenses that were already done within the house, positively affecting IAQ, without the latter condition though being the primary intention (such is the installation of air conditioning/heating systems in newly constructed homes)

Phase 1: Prevention– all the additional and intentional expenses done for preventing IAP issues happening within the indoor environment.

Phase 2: In-house treatment– all the countering measures taken by the homeowners in order to deal with the occurrence of health issues related to IAP

Phase 3: External treatment– all measures taken by a professional team to counter the IAP issues that the homeowner was unable to solve on his own.

When describing each system a 2/3 digit codification system will be used in the following manners:

The first digit will denote the general category of the control as follows:

G for General Pollution Controls (systems that are not targeting a specific source but are targeting a wide spectrum of possible contaminant- e.g. Ventilation systems; Air purifiers; air cleaning plants)

S for Specific Pollution Controls (systems that are targeting a narrowed-down /specific contaminant- e.g. all source control measures as proposed in table 2)

D for professional Diagnostic services (describing the service expenses occurring from the IAQ experts inspections)

F for the illness Finder tables (that are provided in this paper for free and thus not showing in the cost calculations)

The numbers 0/1/2/3 following the first digit direct to the Phase that the control measure is introduced- e.g. G1 refers to general measures introduced at phase 1-prevention

The small letters a/b/c following the number digits refer to the associated control system that was used in the previous phase – e.g. G2b refers to the additional/upgrade measures to move from the system G1b(which is a local exhaust ventilation) to G2b(which is a central ventilation with higher quality filters).

Having the previous codifications in mind, we easily understand that a system such as G3c is a General pollutant control system that is first introduced in the 3rd and last phase of the Home IAQ master plan, which calls for the external help of a professional air quality team. We can also know that the G3c is the evolution of the G2c system that was implemented in phase 2 but unluckily proved to be inadequate to deal with the issue at hand. The different systems and their evolution process will be described in this section along with their incremental costs. At part 3 of the paper, all systems will be embodied in a strategic IAQ master plan that guides the homeowner through all the IAQ process.

Source Control

As many experts will agree, usually the best weapon against indoor air pollution is source control. Effective source control requires the occupant to deal directly with the problem from its originating source and it’s usually the fastest, most efficient and cost effective option to deal with indoor air quality issues.

Source control can be distinguished in general precaution measures one may take to deal with possible sources of contamination and focused control measures to react to existing and identified polluting sources.

Source control can reach its maximum potential with what the author of this paper calls the A.I.R. strategy: A stands for Awareness of indoor air quality issues, I for Insight on the possible sources and the available measures, and R for a direct Response to the situation.

Awareness is the first step in this process and usually the most important one since it solves the problem before it even arises. Awareness requires the occupant to be aware of indoor air pollution problems and recognize the importance that indoor air quality in his life. Without a genuine concern and interest for IAQ the occupant will might ignore and miss all the IAP indicators that could be even life-threatening to him in the future. Awareness of the indoor air pollutants and their health effects and basic knowledge on how to maintain a good air quality within your home is essential since besides alerting the occupant when an IAQ problem arises, most importantly it leads to basic preventive measures that are the most cheap and effective way for one to protect him and his family long-term health.

Insight can come before or after a problem arises and requires for an in-depth knowledge of the IAQ matter under concern. When a person is equipped with good basic knowledge on IAQ as suggested in the Awareness stage, he can be readily available to get a deep and effective insight regarding the issue that threatens his indoor air environment. Therefore, the alerted occupant can do personal research and get practical information on which steps he has to take to deal with his IAP issue effectively and cost-consciously. For example, if a person is building a new house, he might get some insight on choosing the most suitable ventilation system that will prevent him from IAQ concerns in the future. Similarly, if a person faces some BRI symptoms he can quickly identify the severity of the situation and deal with it appropriately before it becomes life-threatening.

Response, the last A.I.R. strategic step can also be taken either ex-ante or ex-post of IAP symptoms and is basically a call for agile, methodic, knowledgeable action. Once the occupant has been aware of the IAQ situation and got a good insight for it, Response is the actual test of applying that information into practice. Responses to IAQ issues can be numerous, however highly effective and cost-conscious responses are just a few, and that is one of the primary reasons of the existence of this paper.

Why the AIR Strategy?

The A.I.R. strategy is unified process that starts from being interested in your own health, and ends in taking measures to maintain it. Simply waiting for IAQ symptoms to happen for you to take action about them means that you already compromised your health and that you need to take more additional, expensive and time consuming measures to fix the problem. Therefore the AIR strategy is suggested not just when problems occur but also before that, as a preventive measure.

Table 2, presented in the previous chapter, has a great variety of source control measures that can be taken in both the preventive or in the treatment stage. Even though a complete source control approach is not recommended for time and cost concerns, still there are some basic source control measures that could be taken in any circumstance, as the homeowner starts expanding his knowledge on IAQ. In this paper, we do propose the basic source strategies that need to be taken regardless, and still leave some room for flexibility to the homeowner to add his own measures to the mix.

Selection and cost criteria

Regarding the selection of systems used in this paper, certain global market products were chosen that fulfilled specified minimum quality requirements based on the academic literature and on IAQ expert’s feedback.

The general criteria for the selection process were that the system has to be of good construction quality and effective in treating certain air quality issues at the most suitable price. By those concerns, highly effective but prohibitively expensive systems were excluded from the list, and similarly very cheap systems with low efficiency and durability were also excluded.

After narrowing out list to certain products that fulfilled all criteria, an average cost was calculated for them and then transposed to the cost tables. Then underlining costs were further broken down into one-time costs such is the installation and actual products price and into yearly reoccurring costs such is the costs for new filters, maintenance and electricity. A detailed review of which specific systems were used and their components, specifications and underlining costs can be found at the appendix section..

Source control systems used

The different source control systems mentioned in the paper are the following:

S1: Refers to all the basic pre-emptive source control measures on homeowner should take regardless if symptoms occur or not. Basic source control involves systemically cleaning the house with non-VOC or other chemical emitting household products made of purely natural materials. Those products can be organic or natural cleaning liquids, disinfectants, detergents, laundry products, perfumes, deodorants, air fresheners etc. If the option of choosing solely organic or natural products is not feasible for cost concerns, exceptions can be made but every product of chemical origin should be checked by the homeowner for containing VOC and other pollutant emitting ingredients. Table 2, along with additional research can be great means in identifying which products and ingredients may have a negative IAQ effect.

In addition to that, a periodical thorough inspection of the whole house and its perimeter is needed to identify any possible pollutant emitting sources and treat them on the spot, following the suggestions found again at Table 2 and by doing additional research. Some basic knowledge and an attitude of awareness (as proposed in the A.I.R. strategy) is a prerequisite for identifying those sources on the first place.

S1r: Refers to all the recommendation for S1 but with the addition of radon mitigation measures, in case that the radon test kit (which a monitoring system that will be explained further later) has shown concentrations for the radioactive gas above 4 pCi/L which is the EPA’s benchmark for action.

The radon mitigation measures costs vary greatly but for most cases a passive radon mitigation system involving the installation of some local exhaust air ducts or/with the installation of radon insulation floors at the basement are relatively cheap and effective alternatives and the author recommendation for most cases.

In rare occasions that all passive radon mitigation systems fail to reduce the limit below the benchmark value, active mitigation systems need to be taken, that include among other the installation of a local exhaust ventilation systems using high airflow air motors. However, due to their higher costs and to their efficient sustainability by passive measures, the active measures have not been included in the cost equations.

S2c/d: Refers to the controls measures that should be implemented in the case of an SBS sickness, that has however a de facto unidentified origin. That means that the source control measures cannot focus on a specific source but instead should a target the potential source s that fulfill the criteria for the current symptoms that the homeowner is experiencing. By treating those potential sources, and giving some time to see the results, the homeowner may solve the problem or at least narrow down the potential sources and increase the controlling efforts on them until the problem is solved.

Table 3 (Burroughs & Hansen, 2011) can then be used to identify the different complexes of symptoms and match the possible contaminants with those found on table 2, and accordingly take the suggested corrective measures.

Table 3 Explanations

S2a/b: Refers to the controls measures that should be implemented in the case of an identified BRI condition which is a medically diagnosable microbial sickness. Then there two actions that should be taken immediately: First all the residents and visitors of the house should see a medical specialist, preferably a pulmonologist, and follow his treatment.

Then attempts to eliminate the contaminants source should be implemented, by that meaning that all potential breeding grounds of the disease should be checked and disinfected appropriately but also that all surfaces and objects that in the house should be also cleaned and disinfected as well.

Suggested disinfectants are natural antimicrobial products such as tea tree solutions, which are proven to be more effective in countering the legionella virus than chemical antimicrobials such as the controversial triclosan that is commonly found in commercialized hand soaps and disinfectant. (Mondello, Girolamo, Scaturro, & Ricci, 2009)

BRI symptoms and possible sources

Table 4 (Burroughs & Hansen, 2011) presents the potential complexes of symptoms found on most common BRIs. Using the information found one table 1 and combining the symptomatology with the one described on table 4, the BRI affected person can easily exclude the option of a SBS condition and he can also have a strong indications on which is the specific microbial agent that he is facing.

Nevertheless, those self-diagnosis tables are not intended to replace the necessity of visiting a doctor to treat the sickness, but rather as mean from the homeowner to identify faster the severity of his condition and take some source countering measure to prevent the spread of the contamination to other persons, especially those living in the same house.

Table 4 Explanations

S3a/b/c/d: Refers to the focused source control measures taken by the professional IAQ team. Since those measures are usually a product of a professional monitoring system, they are usually very effective in achieving the desired goal from their first application. However, the cost for those is often bloated from choosing an over-the-top solution since the expert may be inclined to promote such recommendations.

General Control

General controls for this research basically mean all the systems that target a broad class of contaminants by mostly using dilution control in cases such as mechanical ventilation and extraction control in cases of air cleaners and filtering plants. In addition to those controls, general environmental factors are also accounted as a general control and should be treated properly regardless of any other measures taken.

Environmental factors are temperature and humidity and to a lesser extent noise and natural light. When those factors are within their recommended ranges, the occupants are within a “comfort zone”. Otherwise, symptoms of irritation may occur that may mislead the occupants’ attention to air contaminants as the source of their IAP problems.

Environmental comfort zone can be different from summer and winter, following the guidelines set by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) 55-2004 Standard:

Optimal Environment Comfort Conditions

Table 5: Optimal Environment Comfort Conditions

PARAMETER GUIDELINES

Summer: Temperature of 73 to 79°F at 50% RH Winter: Temperature of 68 to 75°F at 30% RH Air movement < 30 FPM

Based on the ASHRAE 55-2004 standard Burroughs and Hansen set the general comfort zone target within 30 to 60 percent of Relative Humidity (RH) and with a temperature from 68°F to 76°F. (23°C to 25°C). (Burroughs & Hansen, 2011)

Besides environmental control, a number of pre-emptive general control measures should be taken:

Other General Control Measures

G0a: The most basic ventilation control which relies totally on outdoor air inflow occurring from natural ventilation mediums such as open windows and open doors and from house infiltration, commonly known as air leakage which is the process of outdoor air entering the house from wall, roof, door leaks and from not adequately insulated material such as thin windows and doors, due to pressure differentials between the outdoor and indoor air.

Older houses, due to less strict energy conservation standards have very high numbers of natural ventilation, especially coming from infiltration, usually ranging between 4 to 9 ACH (Air changes per hour) as compared to 1.5 ACH found energy efficient homes. Typical American homes are around 3 ACH, still way above the ASHRAE’s limit of 0.35 ACH, although that number certainly does not guaranty IAQ security. (Green Compliance, 2011). The selection of systems in this paper tries to exceed ASHRAES lower limitation at least by 3 times.

G0b: Refers to the most common mechanical ventilation system found in American homes which is local exhaust ventilation. Local exhaust ventilation relies on exhaust fans installed in high air polluting rooms such is the kitchen and the bathroom that remove the room’s indoor air but without replacing it with the outdoor one. That results in depressurization of the house that increases infiltration air coming in, however the infiltrated air is of less quality then the one brought in from mechanical means from outside.

G0c: Refers to a centralized mechanical ventilation system covering the entire house. It’s usually implemented along with local exhaust ventilation on bathrooms and kitchens. Central ventilation systems vary greatly in their technologies and their costs, initial and operational. While all centralized ventilations use forced air systems to circulate indoor air throughout the house, because of energy concerns just the minority of them brings fresh outdoor air inside.

New systems such as ERV (Energy Recovery Ventilation) and HRV (Heat Recovery Ventilation) counter the previous issue by conditioning fresh outdoor air with the temperature/humidity of the existing indoor air and then diluting it through the house, thus improving IAQ and saving energy costs.

However, the initial installation of ERV and HRV is much higher than conventional forced air systems, but accounting for the reduced operational costs it can become a wiser long run choice.

G1a: This general ventilation upgrades control from G0a by adding air cleaners (class A)9 with VOC capture capabilities to all active bedrooms(bedrooms with daily occupants) to compensate for the absence of a mechanical ventilation system. Additionally a selection of air cleaning plants following NASA’s guidelines to prevent VOC emissions should be implemented10 . (NASA, 1989)

G1b: This general ventilation upgrades control from G0b by adding air cleaners again to all active bedrooms. In this case, class B air cleaners are suggested that have high particulate capture efficiencies but no VOC capturing capabilities.

The reason for avoiding the VOC capability is that it’s a costly option for purifiers, especially in terms of filter changing costs, and in the case of a house already having local exhaust ventilation in place at the high polluting areas, VOC emissions are expected to be relatively low in the rest of the house, including the bedrooms.

G1c: This system calls for two upgrades from G0c. First installing in each bedroom class C air cleaners that has decent particulate capture rates.11 A higher quality purifier is not needed here since the centralized ventilation should be already providing efficient particulate and gaseous pollutant removal.

Second upgrade is the replacement of the existing filters found on the ventilation system (much commonly around MERV 8-11) with MERV 13-14 filters, as advised from several studies for IAQ proactive actions. (Ying, et al., 2010)

G2a: This control calls for the upgrade from G1a by installing a balanced central ventilation system12, with or without ERV/HRV capabilities. The balanced central ventilation should also be supplied with high efficiency MERV15 filters and be properly maintained. Air cleaners should also be periodically maintained.

G2b: This control calls for the upgrade from G1b by implementing the same recommendations as in G2a, which is upgrading to a balanced central ventilation system (w or w/o ERV capabilities) and replacing the current filters to MERV 15. Implementation costs could be less than the G1a upgrade since the already existing local exhaust ductwork may be used to complement the balanced central ventilation duct work.

G2c: This control calls for the upgrade from G1c by installing to the central system a balanced air supply (class B)13 if there is not one already. The balanced central ventilation should also be upgraded with high efficiency MERV15 filters and be properly maintained

G3A: Upgrade from G1a to install a balanced central ventilation system (class A) with high efficiency furnace /fan motors to handle MERV 16+ filters. Costs will be very high including the entire house ducting, the ventilation system itself and its replaceable parts.

G3B: Upgrade from G1b to add to the existing local exhaust ventilation a balanced central ventilation system (class A) with high efficiency furnace /fan motors to handle MERV 16+ filters. Costs will be high but may experience deductions if the existing local exhaust system and ductwork could be utilized.

G3C: Upgrade from G1c central forced air system to a high capacity balanced central one with upgrades to the ductwork and mechanical parts. If the central system is already with balanced air supply then additional ductwork is not needed.

Nonetheless, in both cases, a higher capacity furnace/fan motors to handle MERV 16+ filters will probably be needed due to the high airflow resistant of the HEPA filters. Costs will be moderate considering the limited (if any) new ductwork and the upgrade of the existing furnace/air motor without the need to a buy a new one

G3 a/b/c: Upgrade the balanced central ventilation systems found on G2a/G2b/G2c (class B) to higher capacity (class A) ones that can handle MERV 16+ filters (HEPA efficiency). Costs will be relatively low since the only upgrades are mostly going to be for increasing the airflow from the furnace/air fans and rarely for fortifying the ductwork.

Monitoring Control

Monitoring control systems are useful to locate pollutant sources when IAQ symptoms are clearly evident but there is ambiguity for their origin. Even though monitoring systems occasionally may not pin point a single pollutant as the source of the problem, they can still narrow down possible options by excluding those pollutants that were within normal limits. However, due to their relative complexity and costs, they should be used after some basic source and general controls have been applied, with the exception of M1 system, as explained:

M1: Even though the S1 controls suggest that monitoring systems should be taken usually at phase 2 or later, when some symptoms have already occurred, there is one exception to the rule: Radon control. Radon is a radioactive gas that it’s virtually undetectable to human senses and that in high concentrations (usually above 4 pCi/L) can cause devastating long- term effects such as lung cancer. Contrary in short-term periods shows no symptoms at all.

Just in the US, EPA estimates more than 20 000 yearly deaths directly linked to radon exposure (EPA, 2013) . Therefore, it is highly advisable as basic source control measure to buy a radon test kit and test for those concentrations

The Radon Test kits available in the US are very affordable, at about $12 , and many states such as California subsidize them through their Health Departments. The samples are taken by the homeowner and then sent at already covered costs for laboratory results. If t he results show concentrations that average above the 4 pCi/L standard set by EPA, the homeowner should go through a Radon mitigation system until the average indoor concentration reach acceptable limits.

M2: There is a threefold action plan for this measure that takes place after symptoms occur. First, a reliable humidity and temperature monitor is needed to ensure that environmental conditions are not causing symptoms per se but also that are not acting as breeding grounds for other contaminants such is the case with high humidity and mold.

Second, a do-it-your-self CO2 detector tube is needed to see the effectiveness of the various ventilation systems installed. That is achieved in the following manner: C02 is rarely a pollutant per se, but instead is a great surrogate for other pollutants. Elevated carbon dioxide concentrations in indoor air as compared to concentrations in outdoor air are an indicator of inadequate/ inefficient ventilation to dilute the indoor air from its pollutants. If such a problem is evident, control measures may be focused on the ventilation systems instead.

Even though different methods were proposed for determining CO2 alert levels, the one proposed by Andrew Persily is one of the most accurate. He proposes that instead of using fixed upper limits of CO2 indoor air concentration levels14, it’s more appropriate to use as trigger limits C02 differentials of more than 700ppm between outdoor and indoor levels. (Percily, 1997)

The third and last action is asking the homeowner to use pollutant specific, single use detector tubes to measure contaminants that suspected for causing his IAQ problems. Different providers of friendly-to-use and affordable detector tubes can be found on the appendix.

M3: The last stage of monitoring control is implemented by the professional IAQ team and usually involves the usage of very expensive monitoring systems. However it is unaccustomed for the IAQ expert to ask the homeowner for the purchase of such systems, but rather he charges him for the monitor’s usage and the analysis.

The only occasion that the author of this paper might recommend a professional monitoring system is for a wall mounted C02 NDIR sensor that is used to trigger the central ventilation system on demand15 and thus achieving energy costs along with efficient air quality preservation.

Diagnostic Expert Control

D: When all attempts done by the homeowner to identify or treat the IAQ issue fail, then an air quality expert or team of experts should be called. Even though calling an IAQ specialist is becoming a common practice for workplace environments, for households it is still rare. The reasons for that are twofold. First, most IAQ issues can be treated effectively by relatively little effort by the homeowner. Second, the costs involved in calling an IAQ specialist are usually very high. Diagnosis and treatment is often done by the air specialists for simple IAQ issues, while for more technical issues, a specialized subcontractor is usually called working on behalf of the specialist (usually in ventilation system upgrades and other handwork).

Now that each system used in our research is presented we may move forward to table 6 which shows the corresponding costs for each IAQ control system, distinguishing the initial with the re-occurring annual costs. The re-occurring costs are further dived into 3 subcategories: filter costs that describe all the filter changes done annually according to the manufacturer’s recommendations; service costs that could be either done by the homeowner or professional and last electricity costs calculating annual consumption

Share this post

Author

Long time enthusiast for Air Quality, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. I have won my 2 decades battle against allergic asthma by using the finding that I share on this website.
I have founded also an Air Quality company, and distribute more than 300+ pharmacies with our products.
Have also previously worked for California Department of Public Health, Indoor Air Quality Section.
Follow my journey for a cleaner, healthier air for all of us!