I guess this is not such a popular lens. When I bought it, I thought it was a good deal considering the price and the wide range it covered for a fraction of the cost of the Canon 28-300mm. I don't find it to be that bad, and heard of some good reviews that it was an adequate lens for the price. I now understand that Tamron has upped the ante with their own IS for this lens. Again, post some pictures if you have some.

NeuImagePhotography wrote in post #3317402I also get that people can't beleive that the shots also came from a Canon Digital Rebel xti.

Did you do a lot of PP on these? I can' t believe there aren't too many people posting with the 28-300mm given the range and low price. I figured there would be some travel photographers out there who like the idea of taking along only 1 or 2 lenses. C'mon Tamron user. Add a pictures from the 28-300 to this one.

ramblingman wrote in post #3321668Did you do a lot of PP on these? I can' t believe there aren't too many people posting with the 28-300mm given the range and low price. I figured there would be some travel photographers out there who like the idea of taking along only 1 or 2 lenses. C'mon Tamron user. Add a pictures from the 28-300 to this one.

I do very little PP on my photo's. I beleive that you should get it right, in the camera (exposure, white balance, etc...)

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

version 1.1made in Finlandby Pekka Saarinenfor photography-on-the.net

Spent 0.00097 for 4 database queries. PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s

Latest registered member is SimonPB1113 guests, 869 members onlineSimultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014