Ban Homosexuality!

In each problematic situation, you have the problem, the symptoms to the problem, and the enabler of the problem.

The symptom is the war on marriage, and on humanity in general, the problem is the sodomite, and the enabler of the problem is tolerance. The conservatives may have victories for marriage here and there, but this does not stop the sodomite from continuously striving to achieve his goal. The purpose of a war is to stop the fighting with victory over the enemy, not to enable the enemy to continue fighting.

Imagine if you lived in a world where doctors purely complained about symptoms, and never sought out for a cure for diseases. They would have meetings on discussing symptoms, and organize entire conferences where the best doctors of the world gathered together to speak on nothing else but symptoms, and never on diseases. We would call these doctors useless, perhaps insane, maybe illogical. Nonetheless, none of us would like it.

Why is it then that we see this particular situation as dangerous, but not what is happening in regards with the sodomite agenda, wherein Christians keep complaining on its symptoms without offering a cure to end its existence?

I am not interested in purely complaining on the symptoms, but in offering cures.

I will now give the cure to this problem, and it will end it not temporarily, but completely: ban homosexuality. It is a cure and not a remonstrance on the symptoms of the sodomite.

Of course the heretic Glenn Beck is an enabler for the sodomite symptom. Here is a video where he defends the sodomite organization GLAAD and the lesbian Ellen DeGeneres, and then bashes a Christian group for combating the sodomite illness:

So much for your “conservative” Mormon.

For one thing, tolerance toward homosexuality will lead only to tyranny. If the sodomites have their way, it would be illegal for a pastor to deny two sodomite men a mock marriage. One demonic lunatic, Norman Spack, believes in getting young children to become transgender:

I bet I could go to any fourth or fifth-grade class, cut the hair of the boys, put earrings on various kids, change their clothing, and we could send all those kids off to the opposite-gender bathrooms and nobody would say boo. We can do wonders if we can get them early

With such depraved goals, it is beyond me as to how any sane nation could allow such people to thrive. Hilaire Belloc once wrote:

“Danger usually lies, as in the case of the human body, not in the presence of the ill, but in its neglect.” *Belloc, How the Reformation Happened, introduction, p. 59*

We are deliberately neglecting this ill called the sodomite and his pernicious goals, all in the name of tolerance and a feigned Christian love. Love is not about accepting everyone they are, it is often enough about purging the wicked to preserve the innocent. To outlaw the sodomite, would be to protect children whom the sodomite is pursuing to recruit for their demoniacal scheme.

Conservatives keep complaining on what the sodomites are doing, but they keep affirming this idea that it is about protecting marriage and not about being intolerant toward sodomites. But here is the problem with that: they keep focusing on the symptoms and not the disease.

As long as the sodomite is tolerated, the gay agenda will always exist.

In other words, the conservative movement is not purposing an adequate solution. Outlaw the sodomite movement permanently and we will no longer have to hear the debates and the annoying news blurbs on “marriage equality” (to use an absolutely fabricated term).

The sodomite agenda is just as dangerous as the jihadist movement, since they both have the same hatred for Christianity, and both strive for the destruction of Christianity. The sodomites want laws put against us, and they are, and will continue to do so if they are not stopped, afflicting violence against Christians.

Tony Miano, a street preacher, was arrested recently in the UK for preaching against homosexuality. Street preachers were beaten in Seattle at a gay rally and there was a recent video of it showing the mobbish perpetuators:

I will kill you and your family. …Oh my God, this woman is so fucking stupid. Someone please shoot her in the head, again and again. And again. …I’m going to kill the pastor. …If I had a gun I would have gunned you down along with each and every other supporter. … Keep letting [the pastor] preach hate and he’ll be sorry. …We’re going to kill you. …You’re dead. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but soon… you’re dead. …I’m a gay guy who owns guns, and he’s my next target. You better stay off the olympic peninsula. . it’s a very dangerous place filled with people who hate racists, gay bashers and anyone who doesn’t believe in equality. fair is fair. …I advocate using violence against the property of ALL of those who are working tirelessly to HURT my family; starting with churches and government property. …I warn you, I know how to kill, I’m an ex-special forces person. …You guys deserve to die …I tolerate you because I don’t come to where you are and slaughter you.

All of these statements are from sodomites, and yet we disregard their violent nature and tolerate them? I have heard countless times, “don’t hate the sinner, hate the sin.” This type of talk usually comes from people who claim “Sola Scriptura”, yet this statement is not in the Bible.

We are what we do. When we analyze people, we do so by their actions. Hence Christ says “Ye shall know them by their fruits.” (Matthew 7:16)

St. Paul says that those who turned to homosexuality were

filled with all unrighteousness, fornications, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, without understanding, implacable, unmerciful: who knowing the judgement of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death (Romans 1:29-31)

If St. Paul believes that sodomites should be outlawed, then we as Christians should not be either ignoring or misconstruing the Scriptural view of civil and governmental intolerance toward them.

American Christian leaders have shamefully not taken a militant stance against sodomites. Pastor Mark Driscoll has affirmed that the sin of homosexuality is no more a sin than heterosexual sin:

With this he agrees with the Cathar heresy, which taught that to have sex with your mother or sister is no more a sin than to copulate with a prostitute.

How could someone say that sinful sex between a man and a woman, is the same as two men taking part in such a reprobate act so disgusting that it is impossible for me to describe?

The sodomite movement is a religion, just as destructive and evil as Islam and Mormonism. They will not stop, and so neither shall we stop. It is a movement, and so thus it moves. Once it stops moving, it dies and no longer is a movement. The same is with Christianity. We cannot stop moving.

Those who refuse to join this fight against the sodomites, and push legislation banning the movement, should step aside and become a leftist Episcopalian.

We cannot be like pastor John Piper, who is a complete hinderance to militant Christianity.
He writes as a statement of belief:

We believe that every religion, world view, or philosophy of life may freely endeavor to influence and shape our culture.

Really? So the Muslims could influence the culture? That would lead to Sharia eventually. Mormons could influence the culture? Polygamy. Sodomites? The destruction of natural law. Atheism? The outlawing of Christianity. All of these groups, if they had their way, would lead to the obliteration of Christianity, but I guess Piper is okay with allowing these groups to thrive and become powerful.

I do not believe, and neither has Christianity believed for the last past 2000 years, that all beliefs deserve equality and rights, nor do I believe that every movement and religion may freely influence our culture.

Constantine forbade provincial governors from offering sacrifices to pagan gods, repressed idolatry and had countless idols destroyed. He also ordered the temple of Venus in Aphaca in Phoenicia to be destroyed, and had raised to the ground the temple of Aesculapius in Aegae. (1) (1) *Euseb. Life of Constantine, 2.26; 3.43-45*

When the pagan Symmachus, and other pagan members of the Roman senate requested that an Altar of Victory be placed in the Senate House, St. Ambrose fought against such an idea. He sent a letter to emperor, writing on the dangers on allowing the idol to be placed in the Senate House, and on how pagan rituals should be abolished:

For salvation is not sure unless everyone worship in truth the true God, that is the God of the Christians, under Whose sway are all things; for He alone is the true God, Who is to be worshipped from the bottom of the heart; for ‘the gods of the heaven,’ as Scripture says, ‘are devils.’ Now everyone is a soldier of this true God, and he who receives and worships Him in his inmost spirit does not bring to His service dissimulation, or pretence, but earnest faith and devotion. …And they [the pagans] are complaining of their losses, who never spared our blood, who destroyed very buildings of the churches. …Had these things not been abolished I could prove that they ought to be done away by your authority (2) (2)*St. Ambrose, Epistle xvii.1-5, trans. Rev. H. De Romestin, in Nicene and Post-Nice Fathers, vol. 10, ellipses mine*

If all religions deserve equal rights, then that implies that all religions have the same merit. But anyone who has compared Christianity, and the history of Christianity, with the tenets and history of all other religions, what we find is a radical difference between one and the other.

Therefore, not all religions deserve equal rights. Furthermore, there has to be an ultimate truth, which deserves to have exclusivity outside of other religions. Christianity, being this ultimate truth, cannot be thrown into the batch with the others under the nice title of “equality.”

Our civilization, our respect of human life, is based on Christianity, and to allow the other movements to vanquish it is downright self-destructive.

Marriage is a natural right because it is in accordance to the natural order. Sodomite behavior, on the other hand, is not in accordance to the natural order, and therefore it is not a natural right.

… but how does a civilization rid it’s self of the masses who approve & support homosexuality?
Historically, there was only one way. Sodom & Gomorrah were destroyed from the ground up
… children, animals & everything living.

tikvah

Theodore,I just returned from a conference,where homosexuals have “special” groups,even though “outside issues” are TOTALLy against the traditions of this orgnization.They had their own table(which no-one ever manned because I’m sure they were too ashamed).It just had a Rainbow flag( which has been hijacked from G-d)& it was covered with condoms.I was talking to a person at the next table & we said that sex had nothing to do with our organization.She said “no-one had the courage to do anything about this”.I went over & “pinged” all the condoms off the table.My friend recently got divorced & was telling me how disgusted she was because 1 of the women said to her,”why not try a lesbian” & was very aggressive.A few minutes later she ran up to my friend again & hugged her & made another lesbian comment.I was very annoyed & my husband & I saw her while we were having lunch.We were both upset (she was also wearing a Muslim brotherhood,”COEXIST” shirt)but then I remembered the scripture”the goodness of G-d causes repentance’.We saw her countenance change when we talked to her…My observation…whether she’s hitting on people or interacting,I noticed that she was looking to be LOVED…I agree with your article,but this is an interaction I had just TODAY that I wanted to share.

http://tedshoebat.com Ted

Hello Tikvah,

You’re story not surprise me, though it is very disturbing what is occurring in this country. We need to ban the entire sodomite agenda. They tried to steal the rainbow, and they tried to steal the word “gay”, but I refuse to refer to them as gay because it is not adequate for them. They deserve the term sodomite and thats it.

God bless,
Theodore

billo

I wonder what the Church Fathers that Ted has cited would think of the Roman Catholic Churches’ pervasive and ongoing corrupt coverup of the many scandals involving homosexual priests and their sexual abuse of children?

To what extent has the Roman Catholic Church in effect strengthened the Sodomite agenda with their coverup and ENABLING OVER THE MANY DECADES OF THE HOMOSEXUAL PRIEST SCANDAL-YES BLATANT ENABLING!

There is no doubt that the “Sodomite” political agenda is of insidious, vicious, pernicious and potentially violent intent towards not only individual Christians but Christianity as a whole.

There is no doubt that heritical Protestantism is a major contributor to the Sodomite agenda.

Sodomites don’t want tolerance-they want admiration, imitation and eventually adoption of their lifestyle.

My problem with Ted’s concept of intolerance toward “heretics” is that I personally would not want to be subject to Ted’s or anyone elses’ ideas of what a heretic is and what a heretic is not.

For example, unless Ted is Roman Catholic,and faithfully practicing Roman Catholicism and adhering and giving complete assent to all RCC doctrines as formulated, taught and promulgated by the Magesterium, then Ted is a heretic according to the RCC.

We could easily devolve into the sectarian squabbling that characterized the Colonies prior to the Revolution or even the religious wars that have plagued and tarhished Christianity in the past.

No, I think the American Founding Fathers got it right with the Constitution. The problem is, if the majority of the people are faithless, unrighteous, and ignorant, this wonderful Law, based on the Bible and our Judeo Christian heritage AND MANY OF THE BIBLICAL AND WONDERFUL TRUTHS DERIVED FROM THE WONDERFUL PROTESTANT REFORMATION, is impracticable.

I definately also think that the extreme orthodoxy of thought that Ted is proposing is perhaps counter to the teachings of Jesus and the Apostles, especially Paul.

Ted’s extreme orthodox position toward government could also be characterized, possibly, as Jacobin.

Paul in 1 Corinthians not only permits but encourages believers to maintain aquaintances, possible even friendships, with non believers who are practicing many various sins. He also permits them to eat in Pagan temples. He also encourages them to be full participants in the pagan culture of ancient Rome.

However, I do think that it is Protestant Reformation Christianity, for the good of the world, that should be the basis of law and government, not secularism, Catholicism (a tradition which always supported authoritarianism, monarchy and opposed classical republican liberalism), Islam, Mormonism or Rabinnical Judaism.

A great author who wrote about this topic of Christianity and government at length is late Francis Shaeffer, among others. A few others that I personally admire are D. James Kennedy, David Barton and William Federer.

Ok Thedore – I agree with your take on sin. As a Catholic child, I was taught that sin has various levels of gravity. I can’t spell the lighter one – Ven – something, but the biggie is Mortal Sin. It has all kinds of different levels. It depends on the Intent. God has (thru the bible & His Son) stated that certain sins are much greater than others. Mortal sins covering sex run from bad to very bad – as you so stated. Murder is even worse & in all sin – Intent is going to be known to God.
God in His mercy will judge all of us.

grandmamoses

To DryGulch ..

Where can I find this ‘level of sin’ in scripture?

billo

Jesus said to Pilate: “He who delivered Me to you has the greater sin.”

In the Law there are different penalties and different sacrifices for different sins.

Shirley Anne

grandmamoses , it’s not fair …… You got to ask the question before me !!! Kidding, of course …… Exactly , Dry Gulch Dick ( LOL at the screen name ! ) Where in scripture would I find the different levels of sin ??? James 2: 10, states ” For whosoever shall keep the whole law ( Yeshua’s Instruction, NOT to be confused with Legalism, ) and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of ALL. ” ….. Also, before we start giving so much credit to Emperor Constantine, Let us consider what he did in 331 A.D. with regards to changing Sabbath worship to ” sun ” deity worship . Yeshua kept the sabbath and observed ALL the feast days… There is ABSOLUTELY NO Mention of christmas, LENT ? and easter. Who CONJURED UP these pagan practices ????

grandmamoses

Who mixed paganism into worship? The same darn Greeks who try to explain God to the world. We go to the Greek dictionary to find ancient meanings of the Word taught by Hebrew apostles.
This is what causes conflicting versions of scripture. .. not withstanding a whole different Catholic & Mormon Bible to boot.

chriss179

@Ted, It is sure as hell that the loud mouth gay rights activist are to blame themselves if their movement will be silenced. They themselves set out in some unholy crusade to fight conservative values and our Christian values and heritage. If they intend not to step into the light, that’s their business. But then turning around and trying to stop the light from spreading. A light that uncovers their hideous practices. Because they don’t want to hear the reality about their practices and don’t want anyone to be presented with the reality of their acts. Then that’s where the line must be drawn. It’s ok if you are told endlessly that slitting your throat is bad. If you then seek a dark corner and slit your throat that’s your business. God alone can take care of everyone. But don’t try to stop the voice of reason which proclaims that whoever destroys gods temple will in the end be destroyed by god.

grandmamoses

This “tolerance” Ted refers to began in the early nineties, with Operah Winfrey. I remember it well. She had even me crying over the sad stories of cross-gender people. About 10 years later, famous actors began ‘coming out of the closet’
Operah was also used to first introduce on TV, the unknown Congressman running for President. I had seen his book in a store the year before; and wondered how he’d so easily achieved that position.
My mother grew up with a neighbor boy in the 1940s who was homosexual, but that word was never spoken. He was just considered “sissy” A few years ago, he proudly presented his life partner at the class reunion.
When my daughter was in college a few years ago, she said that girls dated both genders on a regular basis, and that she would be attracted to some boy, only to find that he was ‘gay’
Our ‘tolerance’ of sin nature comes from long periods of brainwashing – subliminal suggestion. It’s a ploy of the enemy over nations that have rejected God’s Commands.

Cassandra

Please take time to read “The Pink Swastika: Homosexuality in th Nazi Party” by Scott Lively and Kevin Abrams, which can be found at: constitutionalistnc.tripod.com..
Hitler was a homosexual and had been a male prostitute in Vienna at the time of his sojurn there from 1907 to 1912, and he practiced the same calling in Munich from 1912 to 1914. Hitler is listed as a homosexual in Vienna police records. He lived in a Viennese flophouse known to be inhabited by homos. 95% of the Nazis were homosexuals, a few were bi-sexual and had wives, the rest were divided into Butches, who were the brown shirts and the bullies, and all the horrible monsters who held sway over the Concentration Camps, or Femmes, who were feminine homos, and despised by the Butches.
Throughout Europe in the 1920s and 30s, homosexuality was known as the “German vice”.
Hitler was involved with four women, one of them his niece, whom he may have murdered when she refused his advances, it’s not clear if he killed her or she killed herself, — all four of these women tried to kill themselves, two succeeded. What horrified his niece was the fact that he was a “coprophile” ( a new word for your vocabulary) — a person who is sexually aroused by human excrement. Hitler was impotent as far as heterosexual relationships go, and he supposedly had only one testicle. Hitler is supposed to have purged homos out of the Nazi Party, but he only purged the Butches, led by a sadist monster named Ernst Roehm, who was about to gain the political power and so Hitler got rid of this political rival (they had been lovers in the past).
So of course these Homos hated Christians and Jews for their practice of normal love between a man and a woman and their devotion to their families, which is anathema to the homo mentality. Reading this article has given an explanation to a lot of things about the Third Reich which are understandable when seen through this prism of truth.
The “gay rights” movement often portrays itself as an American phenomenon which arose from the civil rights movement of the 1950s. It is not uncommon to hear homosexualists (those both gay and straight who promote the legitimazation of homosexuality) characterize “gay rights” as the natural third wave of civil rights activism (following blacks and women). In reality, however, Germany was the birthplace of “gay rights”, and its legacy in that nation is truly alarming.
Everybody should read this article.

Cassandra

Barack Hussein Obama is a raving homosexual. Please see: fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com Washington Insider: Obama Member of Chicago Gay Man’s Club
His marriage to Michelle was arranged by Jesse Jackson and Jeremiah Wright (she is his “beard”), so people could be fooled before the election into thinking he was a straight man. Jeremiah Wright ran a matchmaking service for gay married black professional members of the church. Wright was Obama’s lover (they all were) and still is, he often comes to the White House and Obama has himself driven to rendevous with Wright, but his 10 year lover was Donald Young, choir director at Trinity who was murdered on Dec. 24th, 2007 — two other black homos were murdered at this time within the space of one month — to remove anything that might besmirch Obama’s ascent to the Democratic presidential nominee. Obama even came under scrutiny as the possible murderer, but of course, Chicago being Chicago, this was swept under the rug.
So Obama is fanatical about bringing homos into our Marines, our Boy Scouts and every area of our government — there’s a list of over 400 lesbians and Queers who have been given jobs that are not necessary at high salaries — and Hollywood supports his perversion in their films.
Another shocking article is about John Maynard Keynes, who gave us more than just an immoral economic system — he impressed on us his life of degeneracy, perversion and pedophilia. He said: “By a continuous process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method, they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily, and while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some……The process engages all of the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner that not one man in a million can diagnose.”
This article is well worth reading: chasvoice.blogspot.de Charleston Voice: Did You Know the Architect of our Fed, JM Keynes, was a Pedophile and a Pervert?
He was also a Bolschevik, the scum of the earth.

billo

Ironically the Pope just spoke about allowing homosexuals into the priesthood of the RCC:

Now all Catholics, including the Bishops, must follow suit and agree with the Pope. A quote from the above cited article:

“The response in the United States will also be significant. When the Pope speaks and takes a position on an issue, the United States Council of Catholic Bishops is not going to directly contradict him. Now visible Cardinals across the country will have to consider what steps they will take to not judge or marginalize their gay brothers and sisters. For example, a gay Catholic couple in Oceanside, NY, has been petitioning Cardinal Dolan to break bread with them since Easter. Dolan has not responded to the request, arguing that the couple lives outside his community, and that they want to foster debate. Now the Pope is setting a moral example that indicates he himself would probably dine with them, and that puts Dolan in a tight position.”

I assume that Ted will have to change his position on homosexuality in society since the Pope (is he as authoritative as any of the Church Fathers?) has welcomed them EVEN INTO THE PRIESTHOOD.

This is a relatively insignificant issue to me because I reject the self proclaimed authority of the RCC and even the legitimacy of a special priesthood.

I THINK IT UNWISE TO ALLOW SELF PROCLAIMED HOMOSEXUALS INTO PASTORAL POSITIONS IN THE CHURCH. HOMOSEXUALS WHO WANT TO SERVE Y-SHUA CAN DO SO IN MANY, MANY WAYS.

So I disagree with the Pope and the RCC. Therefore I am a heretic according the them. Thank God!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SOLA SCRIPTURA

Patti2013

Well written Theodore. We agree with outlawing of homosexuality, again. It used to be illegal in this country.

However, we must respectfully disagree with you concerning your statements about the Mormon Church. My husband was raised in the Mormon Church and, while we do not except some of their ideology, we acknowledge their stance against homosexuality (as evidenced by their huge turnout to vote down homo rights in California, prop 8. It was their vote that defeated Prop 8. Unlike the evangelical Christians, what sat on their hands and did not vote on the issue, the Mormons took a stand!). And they disavowed polygamy in the 1880s (a historical fact) as they prepared to become a state in the union.

LDS is a break-away from the established Mormon church. I could never understand how a religion based on the doctrines of a “prophet” can be changed at will, adapting to social venues, , like racial issues in the Mormon church. I do admire the family values & stand against homosexuality; but man-made religion is just THAT. .. divisions in the Body of Christ.

billo

I agree with you Patti. Any cursory analysis of the politics of the majority of Mormons will reveal that they are extremely conservative on social political, and economic issues.

I personally have worked with and been acquainted with many Mormons and they are (not just a few) among the finest citizens and people I have ever known.

Mormonism, is in my mind, a serious heresey and I reject their theology and see it as a pathway to hell. Anyone who preaches a Gospel other than Paul’s Gospel (Romans 2:16; 16:25) is preaching “another Gospel.”

It is a typical “salvation by faith and works” gospel.

But classic liberal western government (i.e. American exceptionalism) found in our Constitution includes the First Amendment, a law based on THE BIBLE AND PROTESTANT REFORMATION CALVINISM.

Sola Scriptura

billo

I agree with you Patti. Any cursory analysis of the politics of the majority of Mormons will reveal that they are extremely conservative on social political, and economic issues.

I personally have worked with and been acquainted with many Mormons and they are (not just a few) among the finest citizens and people I have ever known.

Mormonism, is in my mind, a serious heresey and I reject their theology and see it as a pathway to hell. Anyone who preaches a Gospel other than Paul’s Gospel (Romans 2:16; 16:25) is preaching “another Gospel.”

It is a typical “salvation by faith and works” gospel.

But classic liberal western government (i.e. American exceptionalism) found in our Constitution includes the First Amendment, a law based on THE BIBLE AND PROTESTANT REFORMATION CALVINISM.