Hi. I'm Mita and I've been blogging since 1999. Of course, this gives me no 'net cred as my first blog, Rain Barrel, was done using Frontpage and hosted on Geocities. Yes, I am a librarian. Changing the rules so more can win. My future self is awesome.

Monday, July 15, 2013

The Library as Copy Machine: Part I : Pirates of the Alexandrian

Librarians, publishers, and authors are all struggling with the burden of copyright, that being the exclusive right to copy in a digital world. Copyright has become a burden because copying is an inherent property of digital transmission:

As computers retrieve images from the web or displays from a server, they make temporary, internal copies of those works. Every action you invoke on your computer requires a copy of something to be made. Many methods have been employed to try to stop the indiscriminate spread of copies, including copy-protection schemes, hardware-crippling devices, education programs, and statutes, but all have proved ineffectual. The remedies are rejected by consumers and ignored by pirates.

So let’s the change the context. Let's stop thinking of copying in terms of the exclusive domain of publishers. Let us remember that the history of the library pre-dates the history of the publisher.

Let us remember how the greatest library in the world was built from copies. And piracy. Literally piracy.

During the reign of Ptolemy Eurgertes, the Library borrowed Athens’ official versions of the plays of Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides, giving Athens an enormous amount of money; the modern equivalent of millions of dollars, as surety for their return. The scribes of the Library made fine copies of these books on the highest quality of parchment. The originals were kept for the Great Library and the copies were returned to Athens, causing the Alexandrians to forfeit their bond. Other ethically dubious means for procuring materials were also employed. It is said that during a famine in Athens, ambassadors from the Great Library forced the sale of valuable original manuscripts owned by that city in exchange for food. A more conventional technique employed by the Ptolemies was to send people out to buy books, looking especially for rare texts and libraries which might be bought en masse. In addition to buying books, the Ptolemies acquired books through plunder. It is widely reported that upon entering the Alexandrian harbor, ships were inspected, and any books they were carrying were seized. A copy was made and given to the original owner, but the original was kept for the Great Library. It was through such means that the Great Library amassed its large collection.

Let us remember that Google’s search engine is not built from the Internet. It is continually built from a copy of the indexable Internet. One library was built from scribes. Another one built was by spiders.

And when the printing press replaced the use of scribes, the act of creating copies occurred outside of the library and the collecting continued. Many of the world's national libraries have been built through the establishment of a legal deposit program that requires publishers to give their national library a copy (or several) of each work they publish.

By law, a copy of every UK print publication must be given to the
British Library by its publishers, and to five other major libraries
that request it. This system is called legal deposit and has been a part
of English law since 1662.

From 6 April 2013, legal deposit also
covers material published digitally and online, so that the Legal
Deposit Libraries can provide a national archive of the UK’s non-print
published material, such as websites, blogs, e-journals and CD-ROMs.

And while academic libraries have not framed their work this way, the mandates passed by University Senates which requires authors and creators to deposit copies of their works into the local institutional repository sounds a lot like legal deposit to me. Except it's not so much as "legal deposit" than 'deposit when legal' because a university is not a nation and so its mandate cannot trump the contract agreements between publishers and authors. If it could, can you just imagine what a powerful force it could be? Well, Elsevier did and those crafty publishing devils specifically state that in their Article Posting Policy that it's okay if authors deposit a copy of their paper in an institutional repository - as long as is it is voluntary.

I'm going to suggest that all libraries - public, special, and academic - should think of local copying as a means of collection development. While, as I have shown, that it is not a new way of developing library collections, it will be new to most non-national libraries who have enjoyed a long, comfortable existence as a middleman between commercial publishers and a local reading public.

Past Forward (http://wpl-digitization.winnipeg.ca/ ) is WPL's ongoing Public History project, where people can discuss, share, research and contribute to our past. Since one of the fantastic things about Winnipeg is our local music scenes, we thought preserving this part of our city's past would be a great contribution to the project.

So, if you were involved with music in Winnipeg, this is your chance to get all that stuff out from under your bed and online! Get your show posters, venue photographs, & handbills digitized, and contribute to our public history collection.

Register for a space to get high quality digital scans of your memorabilia...

I love that everyone benefits from this project. Those from the public who participate get digital copies of their memorabilia perhaps with equipment they don't have access to and with the guidance of an expert that they might have needed. And not only does the library gets a copy for their public history collection, they have a showcase of work that they can add to, in similar event the following year, if they choose to do so. Furthermore, they could also use this model repeatedly and applied to completely different interest group each time as a form of community outreach. Collecting from one community at a time.

It should be noted that even here the burden of copyright has not been departed or gone:

And now, I'd like to depart on a tangent that the quote above affords me. I want to focus on the technologies - like the Book2net Kiosk - that not make our scanning possible but they make entirely new libraries possible.

Both the Windsor Public Library and the University of Windsor have an Espresso Book Machine, a print-on-demand contraption that both prints and binds softcover books within minutes. I've printed my own book with the machine and I can say from experience that it is a delight to make beautiful papery things to share. But what intrigued me about the machines is how the self-published and public domain titles produced by an Espresso can be added to EspressNet - “a network of content, enabling EBMs to order and print books by retrieving, encrypting, and transmitting files from a multitude of content sources.” Every year, the collection of EspressNet grows along with the use of their printers.

Other self-publishing and print-on-demand services such as Lulu.com and Blurb.com. have created similar collections of works for sale. The distribution system of the written work is baked right into the publishing process, although sometimes it requires an additional cost. Publish with Lulu and you can distribute your print books with Amazon and Ingram (myilibrary) and your ebooks with Apple iBooks and Barnes and Noble nook store. Of note, Ingram has its own business unit that does combined on-demand book printing and distribution at the publisher level through Lightning Source.

Libraries should also consider how we too can bind publishing and distribution together and so that both services similarly re-enforce each other.

Two of my favourite examples of such consideration are PUMA and BibApp. PUMA is a system “where the upload of a publication results automatically in an update of both the personal and institutional homepage, the creation of an entry in BibSonomy, an entry in the academic reporting system of the university, and its publication in the institutional repository.” BibApp is similar. It "matches researchers on your campus with their publication data
and mines that data to see collaborations and to find experts in
research areas. With BibApp, it’s easy to see what publications can be
placed on the Web for greater access and impact. BibApp can push those
publications directly into an institutional or other repository."

And it's not too late for us to get into self-publishing end of ebook publishing. You can't tell me it isn't possible because it's already being done:

“I realized we needed to do something,” LaRue says. “The vendors were
screwing us.” In December 2010, with all of these ingredients mixing in
his mind, he had a moment of clarity. As with the music industry before
it, a common analogy in these conversations, he decided that the
publishing industry’s future didn’t rest with the legacy conglomerates
that had dominated it in the past. Its strength resided in the
independent presses and self-publishing writers who had seized the
opportunity that e-books offered: the democratization of publishing.
Libraries, he reasoned, needed to harness that creative outburst. He
devised a plan to do it.

It was remarkable in its simplicity: LaRue decided to build a digital
warehouse and contracting system, which would allow his libraries to
purchase directly from smaller publishers and authors, cutting out the
Big Six and OverDrive, which would mean lower prices. In January 2011,
Douglas County Libraries purchased Adobe software that for $10,000 would
serve as the backbone of the new system, safely transferring files from
the provider to the library to the reader. LaRue wrote “Dear Publishing
Partner” letters, setting simple yet firm expectations for how the
content would be handled and eliminating the restrictions that
accompanied the major publishers’ products. The whole enterprise cost
$200,000, but LaRue says the libraries have already saved that much in a
year because the prices they’re paying for the independent and
self-published materials are much lower, up to 45 percent below retail.

The system went live in February 2012, and LaRue went to work finding
partners. They soon flooded Douglas County’s digital shelves. The
libraries have so far purchased e-books from more than 900 smaller
publishers and hundreds of individual authors. They make up 21,000 of
the 35,000 titles in his virtual catalog. The rest come from the major
publishers, sold through intermediaries at much higher prices. Those
mainstream titles are still more popular with readers, making up 65
percent of the county’s loans, but it’s clear that the appetite for the independent and self-published content is growing...

3 comments:

About legal deposit: I was browsing the Encyclopedia Britannica 8th edition (1855) once, and read the article about libraries. It was interesting and would certainly not meet the quality standards of Wikipedia. For instance, it was out-and-loud about dissing the legal deposit system of libraries, from publishers point of view.

Thanks for this, another post making me think "I'm not alone".I found you a similar voice to Eli Neiburger and his Access shcmaccess. Libraries in an age of information ubiquity.Warning! Contains libraries, bronies and a potted history of Nyan Cats' intellectual property.