But this icy world may just be an appetizer to what lurks in a region beyond Pluto called the Kuiper Belt.

As this stunning animation suggests, dwarf planets may outnumber regular planets 100- or even 1,000-fold:

However, if a small group of astronomers gets its way, many of these worlds may become fully fledged planets and drop the "dwarf" label.

Where the animation comes from

We first saw the animation in a Reddit post by user Nobilitie. It's actually a recording of a physics-based simulator game called Universe Sandbox 2, according to Dan Dixon, the creator and director of the software.

Each ring represents an object's orbit, and the mess of rings beyond the inner eight rings all belong to dwarf planets.

"It's a nice illustration of what is out there!" Brown wrote in an email to Business Insider. "The striking difference between the orderly giant planets and the randomness of the dwarf planets is quite apparent."

Some astronomers disagreed with the decision (one called it "bulls--t"). The public also didn't take it well: Brown has since received a torrent of hate mail from school children.

Definitions aside, the list kept by Brown sorts objects detected in deep space based on the likelihood of their existence. Larger, inner objects tend to be more certain while farther-out objects are less certain.

Pluto, Eris, Ceres, Makemake, Haumea, and five others meet Brown's "near certainty" criteria — in other words, they're definitely dwarf planets and not comets or other astronomical objects. Thirty are "highly likely" to be dwarf planets, 75 are "likely," and nearly 850 other objects are "probably" or "possibly" dwarf planets.

Brown guessed that about half of the dwarf planet candidates have yet to be detected, bringing their numbers close to 2,000 or more.

Redefining 'planet' again?

An illustration of Pluto's orbit is shown in yellow. The dots beyond it are Kuiper Belt objects.NASA

Even Brown's best estimate may be low, though.

"As you can see from the illustration, some of them are on exceedingly elliptical orbits. Those guys are going to spend most of their time at the outer edge of their orbit, so they're hard to see," Brown said. "There might be a factor of ~5 more of those objects that we don't know about!"

Instead of categorizing worlds as planets, dwarf planets, and moons — terms based on their orbits around the sun and one another — the team wants to simplify the system: As long as an object is big enough to be mostly round and isn't fusing hot gases (like the sun), it should be deemed a planet.

If enough astronomers agree with them, in time the solar system may be said to contain 110 official planets— and perhaps hundreds or even thousands more if Brown's list of candidates pans out.