Ciao,
Il Lun, 14 Maggio 2018 1:58 pm, Torbjörn Granlund ha scritto:
> Emmanuel Thomé <Emmanuel.Thome at inria.fr> writes:
>> ~/gmp $ grep 'mp[a-z]*_[a-z]*ptr' doc/gmp.texi
> @deftypefun mpz_srcptr mpz_roinit_n (mpz_t @var{x}, const mp_limb_t
> *@var{xp}, mp_size_t @var{xs})
> The return type there is not something we should, it's not how other GMP
> functions work.
If I understand correctly what Vincent underlines with his message, we
should explain that both the macros mpq_{num,den}ref and the return value
of mpz_roinit_n are intended for direct use as arguments of mpz functions.
The former with a possible read-write role, the latter for read-only uses.
e.g. mpz_addmul (mpq_numref (q), mpq_denref (q), mpz_roinit (t, np, ns));
> I've personally always used the mpz_ptr and mpz_srcptr in functions that
> take mpz arguments, taking the liberty to use this undocumented type.
>> I suppose we could declare these. I'd like to hear from the rest of the
> GMP "core team".
I believe that both types will not change their role or definition in the
near future, as such they can be documented.
I'm not sure about: how we should explain how to use them.
Ĝis,
m
--
http://bodrato.it/