Hello Lucien leGrey, and welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Meta:Metapub (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). If you would like, feel free to ask me questions on my talk page. Happy editing!

Hello Lucien, today on hy:wp, you've my edit (deleting whole page content). The thing is that a new user was registered, but instead of placing the welcome-template, to his User-talk page, I've placed in on User page by mistake. Then after noticing it, i've deleted whole page content, as there were no previous versions of page, I could roll back to. And you've restored this, made-by-mistake-edit, both created and reverted by same user. "Deleting whole page content" is not always an evil-minded action.

Involved in RC patrol by myself, I appreciate your work, but please be more attentive. :) --Xelgen 17:37, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Your flag has been granted. :-) I put the Bot template (mandatory at sv_wikip) on the bot's user page for you. BTW: You might interested in applying for global bot status? --MagnusA 13:11, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi, please ask for your bot being a reviewer in the flagged revision system at the German wikipedia. This way, nobody else has to check your bot's edits again. You can do this [here] by clicking on "Antrag stellen". Thank you very much. --Louisana 17:00, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

I see the problem: All three of the Russian pages linked to en:HP QuickTest Professional. Any way of weeding out weird cases like this, e.g. by deleting the link LucienBOT added when it finds a link to the same place on another page? If left unchecked, this could get very confusing.

you removed my change, why? I removed the correspondence between the "Jadro galaktyki" in the Polish version of wiki and "Galactic Center" in the English version between there is no such correspondence. "Jadro galaktyki" mean a nucleus of any galaxy. There is, however, no such term in English wiki. On the other hand, "Galactic Center", with big G at the beginning, refers to OUR GALAXY, i.e Milky Way, and there are bilions of other galaxies in the Universe... You cannot make a correspondence for example between the star in Polish and the Sun in English, although the Sun is definitively also a star. I do not know how to resolve this issue but the current situation is unacceptable. bcz@camk.edu.pl (a registered user Bozena Czerny of Polish wiki).

Fine. I am an astronomer so I am sure. Finally I wrote a new Polish section on OUR GALAXY center and moved all the links there. Now it looks consistent. The previous Polish term should be linked to 'galactic nucleus' but there is no such separate term in the current English version.148.81.175.50 16:06, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Yesterday I wrote the article Live at Carnegie Hall Through your BOT it's linked with a Polish article with the same name, but a completely different article. Can you undo this error and take measures that it will not happen again? Thank you for your cooperation. Ceescamel from the dutch WIKI.

Hello! The bot status for your bot sv:User:LucienBOT at the swedish Wikipedia has been revoked due to inactivity. This is for security reasons. If/when you activate your bot again, please drop a note to anyone of our bureaucrats or at Wikipedia:Robotansökan and the robot status will be restored. --MagnusA (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Dear Lucien leGrey, your LucienBOT had no edits on it.wiki for last 12 months. If you have objections, please answer on my talk, otherwise your bot will be deflagged in 7 days. Best regards, --Gnumarcoo 22:04, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Also in it.wiki. We use Wikidata. Tanks --ValterVB (talk) 12:44, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi Lucien, we have blocked your bot on it.wiki, when you have update Pywikipediabot, ask on it.wiki and we unblock your bot. --ValterVB (talk) 14:03, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

I have blocked it at the English Wikipedia for the same reason. It can be unblocked when the code is updated. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:16, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

I'm unsure what you mean by "I'll check everything and if you unlock the bot, it will edit." Can it be unblocked now and not edit interwiki links until it's updated, or should the unblocking wait? PrimeHunter (talk) 18:58, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

I wanted to ask for your help. As you may be aware we have been running banners on many language wikis. We have a lot of new content this year and I really want to conduct a thorough review of our translations. This is a combination of feedback from the community, readers, donors as well as those with professional translator experience. This will help us ensure the highest quality of translations used in our messaging.

To help us out with this I wonder if you would be willing to give us feedback for Spanish using This Link

Simply follow the simple instructions on that page and if you have any questions feel free to contact me on my talk page.

(English) I want to inform you that on bs.wiki there has been a voting that resulted in accepting the removal of bot flags for inactive and/or interwiki bots. Your bot has been identified to meet at least one of these criteria. This decision has been made due to the new developments with Wikidata by which all interwiki bots have become unnecessary. If you want to keep your bot flag, then please report that here by indicating what new task your bot will be performing and how this will be done. Note however that this has to be a concrete and useful task for the community before it will be accepted. If you have any questions, please let me know on my talk page. In case of no response, the removal of the bot flag will be performed within a few weeks from now. However, after that period you are always welcome to file a new request for a bot flag.

I noticed that your bot on japanese Wikipedia has been inactive for more than a year. If you wish to keep its bot flag, please use once within a month. If you no longer need it, the bot flag will be removed.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are beginning the transition to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that OTRS volunteers sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain their access. You are receiving this email because you have been identified as an OTRS volunteer and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015, you will lose your OTRS access. OTRS volunteers have a specific agreement available, if you have recently signed the general confidentiality agreement for another role (such as CheckUser or Oversight), you do not need to sign the general agreement again, but you will still need to sign the OTRS agreement.

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnumwikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain your OTRS access. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

We are looking to clean up inactive bots on Judeo-Spanish (Ladino) Wikipedia. Your bot lad:User:LucienBOT has been inactive for over four years. Consistent with the proposed bot policy of this wiki, we will remove the bot permission from your bot account unless you respond within one week at this page. Thank you for your prompt attention. StevenJ81 (talk) 17:56, 13 April 2016 (UTC)