Mosty likely Foo fighters which I believe are humans from our future going back in time to watch historical events. Curiosity would probably be a
great event to go watch on a holiday in a few thousand years.

NASA is the red headed stepchild of the government.. I doubt they know anything about existence of alien life out there even if there was.. they
barely get funded as it is.

PS.
I have red hair ( when I let it grow ) so nobody take offense

edit on 8/22/2012 by miniatus because: (no reason given)

Link fixed. Thanks !

Im just surprised that they didnt edit that out before releasing it. Thats the part that surprises me the most. Its a good
thing that there are people out there who are able to piece all these pieces together and see whats going on. Like our fellow ATS'er who did that
panoramic view. That was pretty cool.

No problem - I'm not surprised they didn't edit it out because I'm pretty confident that whatever it is has a perfectly mundane explanation ...
satellite, meteor, asteroid, martian moon.. etc ..

I don't think alien spaceships would be strangely shaped and of varying shapes/sizes.. When you apply inverse colors to an image it adds dimension to
differences in lighting, I hate how they apply these filters to trick the average viewer into thinking the "UFO" has mass.

Maybe it's some sort of artifact, or perhaps as the article referenced claims, dead pixels? I'm not an imaging expert by any means, but like to try
and start with the simplest explanation...

Originally posted by Xeven
Mosty likely Foo fighters which I believe are humans from our future going back in time to watch historical events. Curiosity would probably be a
great event to go watch on a holiday in a few thousand years.

YouTube user StephenHannardADGUK, part of a group called Alien Disclosure UK, spotted the anomalies on the NASA images, publicly available on the
space agency's website, and applied a series of filters to try to shed light on the mystery.

As has been pointed out several times, the "anomalies" appear in the same location of the frame in all of the images. What does that tell you about
them?
For example: mars.jpl.nasa.gov...mars.jpl.nasa.gov...

YouTube user StephenHannardADGUK, part of a group called Alien Disclosure UK, spotted the anomalies on the NASA images, publicly available on the
space agency's website, and applied a series of filters to try to shed light on the mystery.

As has been pointed out several times, the "anomalies" appear in the same location of the frame in all of the images. What does that tell you about
them?
For example: mars.jpl.nasa.gov...mars.jpl.nasa.gov...

Obviously that its aliens. Im so tired of you and your facts and logic! Beginning to suspect that youre a reptillian shill.

If those conclusion are accurate then maybe its possible they are doing it on Mars. Not so much to monitor the mission but to keep track of the first
nuclear power source on a planet other than Earth.

Thats an excellent theory. I forge the name of the case but I believe it happened in New Jersey, where a worker claimed he and his crew saw a UFO come
close to the nuclear power plants and just hover around. This happened a few nights. Lets just hope Curiosity doesnt have a short liven life.

Originally posted by PlanetaryStorm
Couldn't that be Phobos?
No idea about the time lapse timing between each image, but I think Phobos has a pretty fast orbital speed.

I'd rather see it as a "bug" or anything else, but the best way to check for those, is to eliminate all possible logical explanations, right?

That very well could be but if it was Phobos, then Curiosity should be able to pick up that image more than once. Every day. Othewise, it may not be a
moon.

Well, without knowledge of Phobos orbit I can't really point that out as possible or not.

Our moon will slightly change place along it's orbit, from our point of view. Phobos is small and have a fast orbit. Maybe it was caught at the right
moment, where it was in the right place with the right sun light reflecting on it.

Isn't it funny, how CGI always involves like a light speck darting across the horizon or something, always the same and a very good give away. The
Curiosity landings will provide many CGI'ers with stuff to spew their crap onto.

The older I get the more I wonder if NASA has to work withing certain perameters dictated by higher ups that keeps them away from finding and exposing
extra terrestrial intelligent life. Why aren't they using ground penetrating radar to look for caverns and underground lava tunnels, underground
water etc? Why aren't they landing around the poles where the ice and possibly water. Maybe these UFO spots are really a side project. Balloon
craft that can float around and take low or high altitude recon. Maybe deflate and land and inflate and lift off again. Now that would be a smart,
cheap way to gather info on Mars!

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.