Conserve-a-tapirs Go Ape Over Rosie’s WTC-Truthin’

Extraordinarily harsh, personal attacks on Rosie O’Donnell for some straight talk about the curious inconsistencies of the 9/11 Official Conspiracy Theory. If what O’Donnell said were as ridiculous as the O’Reillys claim, they’d laugh at her or ignore her. Instead they shriek brittlely, call for her to be fired, and funnel their dolts to the Popular Mechanics coverup written by Chertoff’s relative.

Check out the new book by Dr. David Ray Griffin â€œDebunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theoryâ€

Also, check out the Senior Military, Intelligence, Law Enforcement, Government Officials, Professors, 9-11 Survivors and Family Members who have expressed significant criticism of the 9-11 Commission Report and/or allege government complicity in 9-11 found here:

6 Responses to “Conserve-a-tapirs Go Ape Over Rosie’s WTC-Truthin’”

I’m so glad you fellas are exposing the jEWZ who are played the central role on September 11 2001 !

Only jEWZ are capable of such in your face EVIL , only jEWZ are too stupid to pull it off without being CAUGHT IN THE ACT !

Yes you kikes ALWAYS get caught because although you are criminal by nature you lack the brains to tie up all the loose ends , and therefore we ARYANS will always stomp on you , just when you thought you would get away with it.

The irrational and verbally hostile reactions from those who oppose views that contradict the official explanations does not indicate falsehood of those official explanations. Such reactions indicate that most defenders of the official explanations are not sufficiently well-versed in the facts to successfully argue against detractors. Such argument consumes time and effort, something the jew-hired media talking heads have no interest in expending. It is easier (and often, unfortunately, more effective) to just scream and slander until detractors are silenced and their unanswered queries forgotten.

Only a stupid fool would believe that the Mossad didnt have prior knowledge of the 9-11 attacks which they withheld as it was in the jews interests to kick of WW3 in which they could get the patriotards to fight their wars in the Middle East. Stupid flag waving, O’Reilly consuming retarded lemmings.

I heard israeli spokesman Mikael medved with the jewish authors talk about the fringe conspiracy. The used the jewspeak meaningless specifics that never addresses the questions. he ended the program stating that all the experts agree with the official jew explanation and anybody who disagrees is insane and probably deny the holy cost of course there are no credentials for all these experts.

The official explanation of 9-11 happens to also closely match what is known.

No, it doesn’t. The government’s behavior in every conceivable way displays an intent to cover up what actually happened. And the WTC demolitions themselves fit a proven historical patterns of jews/ZOG creating reasons to enter fresh wars. Occam’s Razor says that WTC demolitions were a typical government false flag designed to get us into yet another war for the jews.

Account for this:

Odigo says workers were warned of attack
By Yuval Dror

Odigo, the instant messaging service, says that two of its workers received messages two hours before the Twin Towers attack on September 11 predicting the attack would happen, and the company has been cooperating with Israeli and American law enforcement, including the FBI, in trying to find the original sender of the message predicting the attack.

Micha Macover, CEO of the company, said the two workers received the messages and immediately after the terror attack informed the company’s management, which immediately contacted the Israeli security services, which brought in the FBI.

“I have no idea why the message was sent to these two workers, who don’t know the sender. It may just have been someone who was joking and turned out they accidentally got it right. And I don’t know if our information was useful in any of the arrests the FBI has made,” said Macover. Odigo is a U.S.-based company whose headquarters are in New York, with offices in Herzliya.

As an instant messaging service, Odigo users are not limited to sending messages only to people on their “buddy” list, as is the case with ICQ, the other well-known Israeli instant messaging application.

Odigo usually zealously protects the privacy of its registered users, said Macover, but in this case the company took the initiative to provide the law enforcement services with the originating Internet Presence address of the message, so the FBI could track down the Internet Service Provider, and the actual sender of the original message.

You have to go out of your way not only to find a motive for Muslims to attack WTC, but to find a way to explain buildings built to withstand multiple plane hits mysterious falling down hours after the fact, even ones not hit by any planes at all. The onus of proof is wholly on ZOG, and ZOG hasn’t a word to say, and to the extent it can, and that extent is considerable, it has done everything humanly possible to block anyone else from pursuring the truth, by banning people from the site the false flag took place, to keeping scientists from examining the metal, to threatening those who heard the explosions. You might as well argue that the USS Liberty was attacked by Arabs, and the Congressional report exonerating Israel told the truth.

Thanks for the heads-up on the book. I admire how Rosie O’Donnell stands against what looks like a massive lie and cover-up. It’s interesting how some people will keep repeating a line of bull as though saying it again and again makes it truth- and they attack anyone who won’t idle-mindedly fall into line and start chanting along with them.

The views of the writers and readers of VanguardNewsNetwork.com are the sole responsibility of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the owner, editor, webmaster, transmitter, or any of the other writers or respondents whose work appears at Vanguard News Network. VNN does not advocate any unlawful or criminal acts, nor should any statement made by anyone at VNN be taken as incitement, threat, or conspiracy to commit any unlawful or criminal acts. The views expressed at VNN do constitute free speech as protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.