Why Labour Is Also To Blame For The Rape Gangs

“He threatened… he would ‘bounce me from Rochdale to Westminster’,” Simon Danczuk told the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse last October. The former Rochdale Labour MP was fingering the current Rochdale Labour MP, Tony Lloyd.

At the time Tony Lloyd was Labour’s Police & Crime Commissioner for Manchester. So what had wrung this threat of violence from the city’s then senior representative of law and order?

“Tony did not want the abuse of children linking with the Asian Muslim community,” Danczuk continued, “because it could have an adverse electoral impact for him in the election for Police Commissioner and Labour more generally.”

85% of Muslims vote Labour, so the party’s fear of upsetting that community runs deep.

Jim Dobbin, the now deceased Labour MP for neighbouring Heywood & Middleton, promoted similar electoral expediency according to Danczuk. “When the grooming scandal hit the town… (Dobbin) also told me not to link the issue to the Asian Muslim community because it would have an adverse electoral impact.”

This connection between Labour and the Muslim rape gangs, who for decades and with impunity have raped tens of thousands of under-age white girls, is apparent right across the North and Midlands. It is no coincidence that local authorities where notorious gangs have openly peddled their foul trade – Rochdale and Rotherham, Newcastle and Oxford, Bradford and Blackburn – are frequently Labour fiefdoms. For reasons of electoral self-interest Labour simply denied what was happening under their noses and in plain sight.

This denial provokes a furious response when challenged. Sarah Champion, the courageous Labour MP for Rotherham since 2012, exposed the deception at the heart of her party last year when she wrote in a newspaper column that “Britain has a problem with British Pakistani men raping and exploiting white girls”. The response was swift and draconian from both the Corbynite Hard Left and the Labour-supporting Muslim community.

First she was forced to resign from Jeremy Corbyn’s shadow cabinet, with the party leader insisting “We are not going to blame… or demonise any particular group.”

Then she received death threats after a Leftist ‘racial justice’ organisation JUST Yorkshire claimed Muslims were being racially abused as a result of her remarks, and accused her of “inciting and inviting hatred against minorities”. Scotland Yard’s counter-terrorism unit increased her risk level and she was provided with extra police security

And she is currently facing deselection by the party, as Rotherham’s branch of Momentum and senior members of the town’s Council of Mosques have combined to get her removed as Labour’s candidate for the next general election.

It isn’t only electoral expediency that persuaded the Labour Party to ignore or deny the abuse. Political correctness too was playing its malign part.

When Labour MP Ann Cryer first identified the grooming issue and approached the authorities that have a duty of care in her Keighley constituency – a town since dubbed the grooming gang capital of Britain – she found her party colleagues and Labour-supporting media like The Guardian viewed her actions as racist and wouldn’t back her. “At the time I was dealing with this, 2002-04, political correctness was playing a big part,” she said. “The Guardian at that time hardly mentioned these things… because it was so politically correct.”

The Labour MP for Rotherham until 2012, Denis MacShane, admitted there was “a culture of not wanting to rock the multicultural community boat”, and confessed that “as a true Guardian reader and liberal leftie” he himself didn’t want to investigate the issue either.

The sexualisation of children and normalisation of unlawful underage sex has been pushed and promoted for decades by ‘liberal lefties’ in the Labour Party and elsewhere, and has facilitated the rape gang atrocities too according to a number of Serious Case Reviews.

In the early eighties senior Labour figures – former deputy party leader Harriet Harman, current Shadow Minister for Work and Pensions Jack Dromey and minister in Tony Blair’s government Patricia Hewitt – all ran a civil liberties group, now called ‘Liberty’, that promoted its affiliate, the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange, which campaigned for the reduction or abolition of the age of consent. Hewitt herself proposed the age of consent should be reduced to 10 from the current 16. Harman even argued that sexually explicit child pornography should not be considered indecent unless it could be proved that the child had suffered harm.

Thirty years later Labour-run Birmingham City Council pioneered the introduction of the gay-propaganda CHIPS programme to pre-pubescent primary school children, in which children as young as five learnt about intimate same-sex relationships. This was soon followed by Labour-dominated Durham Council and others across the country.

Labour has not been alone in promoting the normalisation of unlawful underage sex of course, but the party has been in the forefront of liberalising attitudes through, for instance, the Blair government’s strategy for tackling teenage pregnancies, 9% of which were attributed to girls under 16. Children were viewed as capable of taking their own life-style and life-changing decisions, parents were aggressively sidelined and sexual health centres together with school nurses freely provided condoms, sexual advice and even abortions to teens of all ages without judgement or question.

Following the 2013 Oxford rape gang convictions where seven Muslim men were found guilty of sexual violence, sadism, rape and assault on six white girls all of whom were underage, the key question arose: Why wasn’t something done by local agencies and authorities with a duty of care for the children; why didn’t they intervene to protect the children when they knew what was happening?

“There was…an acceptance of a degree of underage sexual activity that reflects a wider societal reluctance to consider something ‘wrong’. This involves ascribing to young teenagers a degree of self-determining choice which should be respected. […] In a nutshell, a child may be judged mature enough to get contraceptives to have sex with an adult at an age when they are deemed in law unable to give consent to the sex itself. It is no wonder there was confusion and a lack of confidence in taking action.”

In other words, when a vulnerable underage girl was known to be having unlawful sex with older men, the Oxford authorities did not intervene because they saw viewed her as exercising her free lifestyle choice.

Similar observations can be found in the 2013 Rochdale Serious Case Review. And the 2014 Rotherham Inquiry found bluntly that “children as young as 11 were deemed (by the authorities) to be having consensual intercourse when in fact they were being raped and abused by adults.”

It is no coincidence of course that Oxford City, Rochdale and Rotherham councils are all run by the same political party.

Labour’s deadly brew of electoral expediency, political correctness and promotion of underage sex has facilitated the rape with impunity of many thousands of vulnerable girls across the country.

The victims must obtain justice and reparation from the Labour-run authorities’ for their culpable failure to protect them.

And UKIP must hold the Labour Party to account for their culpable failure at next May’s local elections.

21 Comments

Alan Williams
on November 6, 2018 at 10:07 pm

Well said Alan. This scandal has reached mythic proportions with young underage girls being monstrously sacrificed for the sake of expediency and political power. What has been happening in our society is an atrocity that needs to be ended now. It will take heroic courage but it must be done if our young girls are going to live in the safety they used to enjoy before this horror began.

Bill Earl
on November 7, 2018 at 11:02 am

The Labour parties deep involvement in the Asian rape gang saga should have destroyed the party by now. As it has not done so suggests a huge number of people are ignorant of the facts, and the other points made in this article. It really does need publicizing, on the net and a pamphlet in every letterbox.
The party is simply a disgusting entity that has no moral right to exist.

ted coakley
on November 6, 2018 at 12:39 pm

this national scandal has been going on for 50 years, I know because I was there, the cannon street riots in Middlesbrough a labour stronghold and muslim enabler council, the electorate always voted labour, as did their parents, grandparents as working class, the labour government changed all that and enticed the muslim voters with favours of housing , and furniture and easy access to everything whilst giving nothing back. idi amin did the right thing by booting the lot out of Uganda in the 60,s and our looney labour took them all in and this is how the working class were abandoned for muslim votes, and the muslims exploited it and caused white flight, my own children were made to wear sari,s at school and had to eat curried goat at school dinners, call me racist but we moved away and Pakistani,s bought our houses, street by street, and the rest is history, we have gone back to the future, living in a 7th century hell hole with people who want us dead, who live to die who love death and we love life, negative and positive death and life black and white, total opposites, they come here from their hell hole and demand we live in their 7th century stone age hell, they have a country to go back to, we have not, this is our island and we will fight as we have done for a thousand years, the last page of the bible was being finished 200 years before the first page of the koran was being started, the governmentdoes not own this island it belongs to us that fought and won in a thousand years of history, it is ours by birthright and is not for sale, we will fight, we must stand together and fight the cancer that is trying to kill us all and that is the two party one state of globalist communism, vote ukip fight for the right of freedom from dictators and appeasers your children deserve a secure safe future from poverty and slavery

fred
on November 5, 2018 at 3:48 pm

White liberals are the scourge of English society. They dominate politics, church, education and civil services.

Agreed they are dangerous and liberal as long as you agree with their tosh !!

t g spokes
on November 5, 2018 at 9:57 am

So Alan,

It’s not just Labour who don’t want to talk about it. Half the population are terrified of lefty street gangs ( Like those of Brown shirted Germans ) allowed to run free who apparently support them. Even in our local branch there is a reluctance to discuss. This is clearly a time to come out unequivocally on a stance . Branches must have leadership guidance.. We know GB’s stance on Islam. What is in the manifesto about the unholy alliance between Labour and this epidemic. Let us spell it out. It is not a matter for debate. It IS a matter of policy. IT IS already public knowledge. No politician wants to acknowledge it. It’s time for ukip to put its foot down for our little girls. I have heard that TR and GB may be cooking something up. Let us hope so and that UKIP gets some mileage.

Tacitus
on November 5, 2018 at 9:33 am

Fearing my comment to be too harsh, I did a quick comparison of the 2016 vs 2018 local elections in Rochdale. It is a tragedy. In 2016, we stood in 15/20 wards and in many were getting 25 – 30% of the vote.However, we didn’t win a single seat. In 2018, we only stood in 5/20 wards, but where we stood we were getting 15% ish. In wards where we got 26% in 2016 we didn’t put a candidate up in 2018. I think this reflects the collapse in enthusiasm for the party post-referendum, the sudden loss of the leadership team (and their failure to have any succession plans or systems and processes) and therefore the desertion of party activists. Who knows what would have happened had we continued to build on that base. One thing is clear, although Rochdale only put 5 candidates up in 2018 I doubt they benefitted from having a London team fly in and impose its direction upon them, they would be better off learning from Burnley and Derby.

forthurst
on November 5, 2018 at 12:45 pm

The poor performance of UKIP post Referendum can be explained by the belief that UKIP’s work was done, underlined by the departure of Nigel Farage and his replacement by ineptitude on steroids. As a result we have all had disappointing results, consequently absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Rochdale.

The issue of the gang-raping of English children by unassimilable aliens is now a nationwide issue and UKIP’s stance may not win seats in areas where the gang-rapists are in a majority, however, it could and should deter others from voting Labour elsewhere..

John Francis
on November 5, 2018 at 9:30 pm

I totally agree.
I do not think that UKIP have/would lose votes by leading a campaign against Muslim rape gangs.
Equally in areas were there are high Muslim populations UKIP might not do particularly well, however, some issues might be even more important than crude voting figures.

Tacitus
on November 6, 2018 at 12:13 pm

John, did you follow the Stoke by-election campaign, the one which essentially ended UKIP as an effective fighting force? I can only assume not. Let me explain. We were riding high at the time and Nuttall’s focus on northern working class really had Labour worried. They wanted to destroy him – personally. We played right into their hands by putting him in as our candidate in Stoke – which was at the request of a donor who promised to fund the £100k needed if we put our ‘best’ candidate forward. As soon as he was announced Labour went on to the offensive, and yes it didn’t help that there were skeletons in his cupboard, but Labour went much further than that. But then the geniuses sent up from London to run the campaign realised that we wouldn’t have the votes in Stoke because – guess why -the muslim vote! So then Nuttall had to put out a leaflet specifically to appease muslim voters on religious slaughter, etc, which in turn infuriated many in UKIP. Nuttall was basically destroyed by this experience, and the fact is that in the inner cities, especially in north and midlands, where UKIPs potential vote is already quite limited, to then turn off the vote that holds the balance of power is electoral suicide. Meanwhile, out in the shires, they are less animated by this as they have yet to feel the benefit of islamic culture. So it is a lose-lose. You need to get smart. A political party exists as part of a broader movement. Other organisations within that broader movement can take on the fight you want to fight. but the political party has to be kept as attractive to as many people as possible if it will ever have any success as a political party. By the way, there already are several parties who do what you suggest, the BNP amongst them. Why would UKIP want to become a pale facsimile of the BNP, when the real thing still exists? Condemned to everlasting failure?

John Francis
on November 6, 2018 at 10:30 pm

I am really sorry T that you have brought the debate down to BNP level.
It is a sign of failing to convincewhen you have to throw what you obviously regard as ultimate insults in to win a debating point.
I assume then that irrespective of whether something is right or wrong you care not, your only concern is if some voters might not appreciate the message.

John Francis
on November 5, 2018 at 9:32 am

Alan, the work you are doing is outstanding.
Please keep the pressure on, I just hope you receive the full backing of our party, UKIP.
So many people, some even within UKIP, seem to want to dilute or deflect attention away from the true source of this scandal.
Muslim rape gangs, who operate in most of our towns and cities, are a blight and a curse on our society and they must be called out.

t g spokes
on November 5, 2018 at 9:25 am

Vote Labour and rape little girls.

Tacitus
on November 5, 2018 at 9:35 am

That is a ridiculous statement. Not least because grammatically you are suggesting that the person who votes labour is a paedophile rapist. Can we please have sensible, fact-based discussion? Do you know how to use twitter, that comment would be right at home in that environment.

Kevin Baverstock
on November 6, 2018 at 11:23 am

This is why we need moderators.

Rob Pearce
on November 6, 2018 at 1:46 pm

So not a believer in free speech then are you Kev.

Although I get totally confused by tg’s opinions, I will defend to the death his right to confuse me with his blunt candour and his grammatical idiosyncrasies.

UKPD has moderators who do a fantastic job. They even post my blunt candour.

Tacitus
on November 5, 2018 at 9:06 am

Alan, this line of argument didn’t go down very well in the last local election in Rochdale (result: down to 4% of the vote from 16% in 2016, compared to Labour who won 52% of vote) where the crack London team flew in with your leaflet, why do you think it will fare better next May? In fact all the signs are that UKIP will be wiped out, as we have in the last 2 sets of local elections, because UKIP is retreating into a BNP lookalike. Unfortunately, the Sarah Champion who you now call brave was one of the three labour MPs defamed by Jane Collins in her similar rant. I am not saying that you are wrong, but there is clearly a problem with the way you are saying it. Can I suggest that NOBODY from London go anywhere near the north, and vice versa, we promise not to come to London.

Alan Craig
on November 5, 2018 at 11:12 pm

Hi Tacitus, I agree that no one from London should impose themselves on the North, nor indeed visa versa. But not everyone in the North is hostile to working in partnership with people from London or other regions like you appear to be, and many welcome a wider cooperation.

Tacitus
on November 6, 2018 at 8:43 am

Alan, while you are here, could you please explain the connection between David Kuerten and yourself, it is public knowledge that you are the ex-leader of the Christian People’s Alliance, but was David also a member? You obviously have a close relationship and I was told by another ex-CPA member that he stood in the last election in your stead because your (entirely valid) concerns over the welfare of your family meant you didn’t want to put your head over the parapet. Also, does David have a wife and kids, because although he talks a lot about family values, I have never once heard him refer to a spouse or children, thank you.

John Francis
on November 6, 2018 at 9:47 am

To Alan Craig, if i was you Alan, I wouldn’t bother to even think about answering offensive questions posed to you about personal matters like family and friendships.
What have these matters got to do with your public/political life and what business are they of anyone else?

Alan Craig
on November 6, 2018 at 7:11 pm

Fair point John. However I am happy to correct or clarify for Tacitus a couple of matters: (a) David K has never been a member of CPA. (b) He didn’t stand “in my stead”. He stood in his own right because he wanted and intended to, and I was happy to act as his campaign manager.

But these matters are off topic here. If Tacitus or anyone else wants more clarification, my email is alancraig3@aol.com, although Tacitus will have to reveal his (or her) identity if s/he wants me to answer his/her questions.

Search

Search for:

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Please leave this field empty

Email *

Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all the latest from Independence Daily in your inbox.