Where I live, the A200K kit (Body+18-70mm) costs SGD$1099. Add $300 to the kit price for the 75-300mm telephoto lens($399 on its own). This is an attractive price, compared to the Canon 400D, which costs $1199. The Sony A200K was $1099 all along, whereas the 400D's (18-55mm kit) price just dropped from $1349 not too long ago. Another good thing is that the A200's kit lens is 18-70mm, a bit longer than most other brands' kit lens of 18-55mm.

Design: Feels somewhat plasticky. Although its nice to the touch for me, some people may not like this. I agree that a plasticky feeling isn't always good. I had to get used to the scroll dial's(aka control dial) position in front of the shutter release button, because I'm used to the 400D's opposite position. Depending on the size of your hand, the grip may not be large enough for you. The weight is reasonable, but as it is designed for people who just entered the world of dSLRs, it may require some getting used to. The 2.7 inch LCD screen is slightly larger than some competitors'.

Noise: The NR(Noise Reduction) is good for high ISO settings. It reduces the noise level by substantial amounts(See: Sample images paragraph) especially at dark areas. This is important when using an ISO sensitivity of 3200 at night. One disadvantage of the NR when switched on is that after shots of longer shutter speeds (e.g. 10 seconds), the processing time takes a bit of time. The NR is automatically deactivated in Drive mode. NR available for shutter speeds above 1 second and ISO values of over 1600.

Operating temperature range: 0-40 degrees Celsius. (Don't think it'll last very long in the Sahara or the Arctic. But then again, how many of us go there? =P)

Final thoughtsAll-round good for an entry-level dSLR camera. Made by electronics powerhouse Sony, this has not disappointed me so far. (Even though I have/had 4 different camera brands at home.) One disadvantage is Sony' habit of making propietary additions. Flash gun, lens, you name it. Only the CF card(for the Alpha series) is not from Sony.

Sample images: Request if needed and I'll do my best to get them for you.

Signed, your fellow CL reviewer,
SnS

P.S.: For a more in-depth description, please go to Gordon's CameraLabs review at this link.

For my review: All feedback is most welcome!

Note: All prices were given in Singapore Dollars(SGD).

EDIT on 21st May-------------

Final Say: With the other, newer and better models like the A300 and A350, you may want to consider spending just a little more for better features. However, the A200 is for those on a pretty tight budget wanting a decent entry-level camera.

Last edited by SCREAMnSHOUT on Wed May 21, 2008 9:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

Yes, the Eye Start AF uses the eye sensors (in other cameras, these sensors merely switch the LCD screen on and off) to detect your eye movement. They then adjust the focusing point. Like I said, it works more obviously with low depths of field.

Its a strange thing Sony calls it Eye Start AF. Maybe they couldn't really find a better term for it, lol.

I find it quite odd that none of the reviews or Sony themselves mention this. Very cool though if it does work.

Yep, it's there in the manual. It will be interesting to hear how useful it is, though. Comparing this feature with the behaviour of the Canon 40D, with which I am familiar, on that camera focussing doesn't start until you depress the shutter button halfway but once focussing is complete that's it. You can recompose and provided you don't release the pressure on the shutter button the focus remains locked unless AI Servo AF or AI Focus mode is selected.

On the A200 pressing the shutter button halfway stops AF (unless Continuous AF or Automatic AF is selected: c.f. Canon's AI Servo AF or AI Focus) at which point you recompose. I'm not clear how the A200 behaves if you need to take a shot but can't use the viewfinder. Do you have to disable "eye-start AF" first?

Anyway, it seems to me that all you gain by using eye-start AF is the fraction of a second lost while cameras like the 40D focus as you depress the shutter button halfway and this is at the potential expense of continual focussing on the A200 draining the battery. Probably not a lot in it but I am, of course, guessing.

Yea I realise that the A200 has the eye-start AF but I think SnS was referring to an AF system that tracks your eye movements to determine the selected focus point. Was that what you meant SnS? Or have I misunderstood you?

I noticed that you mentioned: "Automatically focuses on whatever you look at".

If the Eye Start AF is switched on, you can leave it on a table(for example) and not touch it with your hands and it will focus. Just use your eye to look through the viewfinder and whatever you look at will be the focus point. This may not work if you have a habit of putting your eye a little away from the centrepoint of the viewfinder(like me sometimes.)

...If the Eye Start AF is switched on .. use your eye to look through the viewfinder and whatever you look at will be the focus point...

Err, are you absolutely sure about that? I don't have any way to check but I definitely get a sense from the manual that the A200 does not have eye-controlled focus as featured on the EOS 3. Sorry if I'm being a bit thick, here.

It definitely doesn't have eye-focusing from an extended use of one here in the UK. Perhaps the confusion is with letting the camera auto select the focal point(s) and SnS interpreted this and eye-selection?

It's not a bad review you have there. You've covered the main points. What goes for the A200 though is the price point and the feature set. I think that's all the positives I can come up. I would be stressing certain flaws more though - the focal point indicators in the viewfinder aren't terribly visible, the noise handling is par for an entry model, and not as stellar as that of the competing (and getting dated) 400D. Build quality compared to the 400D is similar, though I've yet to experience a rattle with an A200; the grip is bordering on the meagre side and is more suited to smaller hands. Without carrying on too long, I'll end with shutter sound being loud.

I don't mean to say the A200 is not a good camera, but on the list of cameras I've had extended play with, it's close to the bottom.