Wait, what? No Colossus procs in 15 minutes of auto-attacks? That has to be a bug. Make sure your weapon really is enchanted with Colossus, and test it again for a minute or two once the server comes back up (in case it was a server issue). If you still don't see a proc in one-two minutes, don't bother with the rest of the test. 60 minutes with 0 procs is just as useless as 15 minutes with 0 procs. Bugged enchant is bugged.

Klaudandus wrote:do you need the 60 mins to be continuous? I have not seen a single Colossus proc with just autoattacks

Edited my earlier post while you were posting. See above.

If you get time tonight, the WoG/HPr re-test would be really useful. The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced that WoG and HPr got a stealth buff (either intentionally or not) and the tooltip hasn't been updated yet.

A separate re-test (i.e. separate log) of Holy Prism on an enemy target would be good as well, just in case. Just make sure you don't test both versions of Holy Prism in the same log.

#6 can be done as ret, and it's fine to apply the physical vulnerability debuff yourself. But you'll still need someone else to apply Sunder and spell vulnerability, I think. I can be around all day today, so I can roll up a pre-made to help if need be.

Those translate to individual proc chances of 2.8%, 2.63%, and 2.00%, respectively. 95% CI's would be +/-0.66%, 0.64%, and 0.56%. A 1 PPM effect with a 1.6-speed weapon has a proc chance of 2.67%, It seems like a reasonable guess that this is a 3 PPM enchant (8% net proc chance) that randomly chooses which buff to grant. The net proc rate is 7.43%, CI of +/- 1.05%, which fits with that pretty nicely.

The definitive test would be to repeat this with a 3.6-speed weapon; if it's a PPM effect, the proc rate will go up to about 18% (total, 6% each).

theckhd wrote:#6 can be done as ret, and it's fine to apply the physical vulnerability debuff yourself. But you'll still need someone else to apply Sunder and spell vulnerability, I think. I can be around all day today, so I can roll up a pre-made to help if need be.

I don't have time this evening, I'll see what I can do tomorrow morning or at the weekend.

Flowing River and Dancing steel aren't easy to get even with an echanter they are very expensive, will take some time to get them.

OK, that makes a little more sense. 11 misses, 53 hits on the Raider dummy, ~17% miss rate, close enough to 15% given the small sample size. Light's Hammer/Arcing Light works like Consecration - spell hit, each tick can hit or miss individually.

Interestingly, Holy Prism doesn't seem to miss. 56 successful attacks, 0 misses. Chances of that occurring with a 15% chance to miss is 0.01%, enough to comfortably say that Holy Prism is automatically successful even when cast offensively. There were also 0 misses in your HPr self-cast naked data set (though only 26 attempts, so a 1.46% chance of occurring). But I think it's a safe bet that Holy Prism automatically connects in both forms.

Base damage and healing on Holy Prism matches expectations (both within bounds predicted by equation). Though in the naked set, it's hard to really tell for sure, since a 40% bonus to 301 spellpower isn't enough to move the goalposts. That wasn't the point of this data set anyway, of course.

Tooltip on Arcing Light varies between Wowhead and Wowdb. Wowhead claims identical damage/healing, wowdb has (2513-3071)+0.247*SP for damage and (2261-2763)+0.222*SP for healing. The maximum damage and healing values match wowdb's estimates exactly, both of the observed minima are about 1% higher. Going to assume that WoWdb's info is more accurate based on this data.