Joe Says It's So: Synagogue's Risen

by
Thomas A. Droleskey

One of the most singularly garrulous men in the history American politics, the egregious pro-abortion, pro-perversity, admitted plagiarist and serial demagogue by the name of Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., who is currently the Vice President of the United States of America, was flapping his jaws ten days ago when he spoke about the influence of Talmudism on the United States of America. For a change, Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., was right, well, at least up to his judgment concerning whether the influence of Talmudism in this land that was founded by men who had a hatred for Christ the King had been good or bad. Biden, of course, considers the influence of Talmudism upon politics, education, law, entertainment, popular culture, banking, commerce and finance to represent an unqualified "good."

Vice President Joe Biden spoke at length Tuesday night about the
influence of Judaism on the United States, dating back to the country's
founding and to the present day as Jews helped shape views on gay
rights.

“The truth is that Jewish heritage, Jewish culture, Jewish values are
such an essential part of who we are that it’s fair to say that Jewish
heritage is American heritage,” he said. “The Jewish people have
contributed greatly to America. No group has had such an outsized
influence per capita as all of you standing before you, and all of those
who went before me and all of those who went before you.”

Biden spoke for nearly 20 minutes at the American Institute of
Architects building in Washington, at times improvising after asking
that the teleprompter machine that had been set up in the event space be
taken down. (He joked about President Obama's reliance on the machine, but later gave Obama credit, noting he "sends his best" but is "otherwise occupied with a few problems.")

“You make up 11 percent of the seats in the United States Congress.
You make up one-third of all Nobel laureates,” he said. “So many notions
that are embraced by this nation that particularly emanate from over
5,000 years of Jewish history, tradition and culture: independence,
individualism, fairness, decency, justice, charity. These are all as you
say, as I learned early on as a Catholic being educated by my friends,
this tzedakah.”

“The embrace of immigration” is part of that, as is the involvement of Jews in social justice movements.

“You can’t talk about the civil rights movement in this country
without talking about Jewish freedom riders and Jack Greenberg,” he
said, telling a story about seeing a group of Jewish activists at a
segregated movie theater in Delaware. “You can’t talk about the women’s
movement without talking about Betty Friedan” or American advances in
science and technology without mentioning Einstein and Carl Sagan, or
music and Gershwin, Bob Dylan and “so, so, so many other people.”

“I believe what affects the movements in America, what affects our
attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything
else,” he said. That’s why he spoke out on gay marriage “apparently a
little ahead of time.”

“It wasn’t anything we legislatively did. It was ‘Will and Grace,’ it
was the social media. Literally. That’s what changed peoples’
attitudes. That’s why I was so certain that the vast majority of people
would embrace and rapidly embrace” gay marriage, Biden said.

“Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes,
whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish
leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is
immense. And, I might add, it is all to the good,” he said.

Jews have also been key to the evolution of American jurisprudence,
he continued, namedropping Brandeis, Fortas, Frankfurter, Cardozo,
Ginsberg, Breyer, Kagan. “You literally can’t. You can’t talk about the
recognition of … rights in the Constitution without looking at these
incredible jurists that we’ve had.”

“Jewish heritage has shaped who we are – all of us, us, me – as much
or more than any other factor in the last 223 years. And that’s a fact,"
he said.

“We talk about it in terms of the incredible accomplishments and
contributions” of Jews in America, Biden added, but it’s deeper “because
the values, the values are so deep and so engrained in American
culture, in our Constitution.”

“So I think you, as usual, underestimate the impact of Jewish
heritage. I really mean that. I think you vastly underestimate the
impact you’ve had on the development of this nation. We owe you, we owe
generations who came before you," he said. (Biden: 'Jewish heritage is American heritage'.)

Well, there is sort of a reader's digest version of the points made at length and with great scholarly documentation by Mr. Hugh Akins in Synagogue Rising. Ah, but can you imagine if Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., made all of those points only to conclude that the influence of Talmudism on law, education, politics, political culture, constitutional interpretation and the very identity of the United States of America as a nation had been harmful instead, as he said ten days ago now, "all good"? It is apparently all right to discuss the disproportionate, outsized influence of Talmudists upon life in the United States of America as long as way bows down to its unquestioned "goodness." Look at all of the difficulty that Patrick Joseph Buchanan and the late Mr. Joseph Sobran got themselves into over the course of decades of writing by discussing the adverse nature of Talmudic influences upon American life, law and culture.

A momentary digression, please.

Where did Biden come up with "two hundred twenty-three year" number? The Declaration of Independence, which is a thoroughly Judeo-Masonic document, was promulgated on July 4, 1776, nearly two hundred-thirty-seven years ago now. The Constitution of the United States of America was ratified on June 21, 1788, when the State of New Hampshire became the ninth state to ratify it following its approval by what was called at the time the Philadelphia [Constitutional] Convention on September 17, 1787, meaning that the Constitution was ratified nearly two hundred twenty-five years ago now. The Constitution went into effect on March 4, 1789, which is a little over two-hundred twenty-four years ago now. As Jews had been in the English Colonies as early as the Seventeenth Century, it is a little mystifying as where Biden got his own figure of two hundred twenty-three years. Then again, Biden makes more factual errors than former Vice President James Danforth Quayle ever did, but he gets a free pass because well, he's the "likeable" Joe Biden.

Pardon me. I digressed.

Other than noting that Vice President Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., had come to the only politically acceptable and thus correct conclusion about Jews in the United States of America, a conclusion in which he believes with all of his Americanist heart, the egregious, foul-mouth and mean-spirited petty self-seeking demagogue from the State of Delaware (by way of his birthplace, Scranton, Pennsylvania), Biden spoke the truth when he explained that Judaism was deeply ingrained in the very fabric of the United States Constitution as one of the principle goals of Judeo-Masonry is, of course, to eradicate any mention to the Holy Name of Our Divine Redeemer, Christ the King, in the texts of constitutions and laws. The only acceptable form of government for Talmudists is one that is religiously neutral, one that gives them the opportunity to hack away at every residue of Catholic teaching that had survived, albeit in a form corrupted by Protestantism, and managed to be filtered down in American life.

Yes, adherents of the Talmud have been in the vanguard of making the United States Constitution into a "living document" as they recognize that a written document that admits of no higher authority than its own words is of its nature a vessel into which succeeding generations can "read into" it whatever they desire. After all, as I have noted so many times before on this site, why should anyone accord the words of the Constitution any kind of fixed meaning (even though they do have such a meaning, obviously) the Judeo-Masonry's ally, Protestantism, makes of the very words of Sacred Scripture itself whatever they desire as they disregard the Divine-established and infallibly maintained teaching authority of the Catholic Church?

The Constitution is of its nature utterly defenseless against itself. The only thing that has been accomplished by the likes of Louis Brandeis and Benjamin Cardozo and Arthur Goldberg and Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer is to take full advantage of the Constitution's own inherent defects to turn into a plaything for Judeo-Masonic organizations to bring litigation to push and push and push its text into supporting every manner of social evil and vice imaginable.

Talmudists have been aided no end in this regard by the presence of Freemasons on the Supreme Court of the United States of America over its history. This was especially so during the era of the Chief Justiceship of Earl Warren from 1953-1969, who was himself a Master Mason from the State of California. The notorious freestyle interpreter of the Constitution and law, William O. Douglas, was a Freemason who served throughout the entirety of Warren's tenure as Chief Justice. Douglas, who was appointed by the Freemason Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1939 and did not retire until 1975 (being replaced on the Court by a non-Mason,John Paul Stevens, who was appointed by the Freemason Gerald Rudolph Ford, Jr./Leslie Lynch King, Jr., in 1975, and proved be a firm supporter of the chemical and surgical execution of the innocent preborn--as had been Douglas himself). Other Freemasons to serve on the Warren Court were Stanley Reed, Robert Jackson, Harold Burton, Tom Clark, Sherman Minton, Thurgood Marshall and Potter Stewart.

There are now three Talmudists on the Supreme Court of the United States of America (Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan), something something that matters much more than the fact that there are six Catholics on the Court at this time as one of those baptized Catholics, Sonia Sotomayor, really does not practice the Faith any longer and is a thorough pro-abort, and another, Anthony Kennedy, has voted to uphold "reproductive rights" time and time again, including notoriously in the case of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Robert Casey, June 27, 1992 (see An Illusion of a Victory, which explained that Kennedy's majority opinion in the case of Gonzales v. Carhart, April 18, 2007, was premised upon legal access to surgical baby-killing in the latter stages of pregnancy by means of the hysterotomy and dilation and evacuation, making the conditional, partial ban on the dilation and extraction/partial-birth abortion method legally permissible). Yes, the Talmudic influence on the Supreme Court of the United States of America as well as upon lower Federal courts and courts at the state and local level has been vast.

Consider the following examples of the influence also of the Anti-Defamation League of B'Nai Brith with, working frequently in conjuction with the American Civil Liberties Union, itself a bastion of Talmudists, in filing amicus curiae briefs with the court and by issuing of various press releases in the defense of baby-killing and perversity:

Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, et al. (2005) This Supreme Court case involves the constitutionality of The
New Hampshire Parental Notification Prior to Abortion Act. The Act
prohibits abortions for minors unless the parents have been notified,
but provides exceptions for abortions necessary to prevent death and for
minors who have obtained a judicial declaration that they are mature
enough to make a decision concerning abortion. The First Circuit Court
of Appeals previously ruled that the Act was unconstitutional because it
does not include a health exception and the death exception is too
narrow. ADL, together with 41 other religious and religiously affiliated
organizations, joined a brief authored by the Religious Coalition for
Reproductive Choice. The brief argued, among other things, that in
emergency situations, the Act unconstitutionally threatens the health
and lives of young women, and undermines their right to choose an
abortion in accordance with religious faiths that place great value on
women’s health and lives. The variety of religious beliefs about
abortion underscores the importance of maintaining a private sphere–
free from undue government interference – in which women, including
minors, can make choices to protect their own lives and health in
accordance with their faiths. Although parental guidance in young
women’s major life decisions, including whether to end a pregnancy, is
important, state-mandated parental involvement can sometimes harm the
minor, such as where the family is dysfunctional or where an emergency
situation requires immediate action.

Amici are religious organizations and religiously
affiliated organizations dedicated to preserving religious freedom for
all persons and to protecting a woman’s health and right to carry or
terminate her pregnancy in accordance with her religion and values.1 The
statements of interest provided by amici, included in Appendix B to
this brief, demonstrate their shared interest (from different
perspectives) in the right of women of all ages to make reproductive
choices in accordance with their individual conscience and free from
governmental interference. A full listing of the forty-two (42)
organizations signing this brief as amici curiae appears in Appendix A.

Because amici value life and health, and
recognize the many divergent theological perspectives regarding
abortion, amici agree that all women whose health is at risk should be
free to seek the best available medical advice, without governmental
coercion or constraint, in making the difficult decision whether to
terminate a pregnancy. Adherence to these principles compels amici to
support Respondents in this case.

Because amici, cherish human life and health as
among their most important values. Many of these religions hold that it
is morally appropriate for women of all ages to consider – in accordance
with their faiths – the threat to their lives or health in deciding
whether to terminate a pregnancy. The New Hampshire Parental
Notification Prior to Abortion Act, N.H.Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 132:24-132:28
(Supp. 2004) (the “New Hampshire Act” or the “Act”), lacks a health
exception and an adequate life exception, as required by this Court’s
precedents. In emergency medical situations, the Act unconstitutionally
threatens the health and lives of young women, and undermines their
right to choose an abortion in accordance with religious faiths that
place great value on women’s health and lives.

The religious component of the rights of privacy
and of reproductive choice have been repeatedly recognized in this
Court’s opinions, including in cases as early as Pierce v. Society of Sisters,
268 U.S. 510 (1925), and as recent as Planned Parenthood of
Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). Many Americans
reflect upon their religious beliefs and moral principles when making
important private decisions about family, marriage, and procreation. The
variety of religious teachings and beliefs about abortion underscores
the importance of maintaining a private sphere – free from undue
government interference – in which women can make choices to protect
their own lives and health in accordance with their faiths and their
consciences. This private sphere extends to minor women who are faced
with pregnancies that threaten their lives and health. Although amici
support and encourage parental guidance in young women’s major life
decisions, including whether to end a pregnancy, they recognize that
state-mandated parental involvement can sometimes harm the minor, such
as where the family is dysfunctional or where an emergency medical
situation requires immediate action. The Constitution protects minors
from such threats to their lives, health, and religious beliefs. (Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, et al.)

Yesterday, the Anti-Defamation League
(ADL) urged the Florida Senate Education Pre-K-12 Committee to reject a
divisive and unconstitutional school prayer bill – SB1360 - at its March
26th hearing. If enacted, SB1360 would permit Christian, Muslim,
Jewish or other sectarian prayers at public school assemblies, sports
events, dances and other school-related activities.

In a letter to the Florida Senate
Education Pre-K-12 Committee, ADL advised that, In our religiously
diverse state, such a policy is patently unfair, divisive, and
unconstitutional, and it would cost local school districts and taxpayers
needless litigation expenses. The First Amendment and federal Equal
Access Act provide public high school students with the right to
privately pray alone or in groups during non-curricular time and to form
non-curricular religious clubs. The clear effect of this policy would
be to impose the majority's religious beliefs, which depending on the
individual school could be Protestant, Catholic, Jewish or Muslim, upon
all students at school-sponsored high school activities.

Practically speaking, most school-related
activities are "noncompulsory" in name only. Students such as sports
team members make commitments that require their attendance at games.
And other students feel intense peer pressure to attend school-related
activities. Regardless of peer pressure, students should not have to
choose between attending a school-related activity and being subjected
to unwanted religious activity … .

In these difficult times, we urge the
Committee on Education Pre-K-12 to focus on matters that unite
Floridians and that do not risk unnecessary expenditure of taxpayer
funds. We therefore urge you to vote against SB1360.

In its most recent school prayer case –
Santa Fe Independent School v. Doe - the U.S. Supreme Court found that a
school policy virtually identical to the policy provided for in SB1360
unconstitutionally endorsed and coerced religion.

The constitutional mandate of separation
of church and state, as interpreted in a long line of U.S. Supreme
Court decisions, prohibits a public school from giving students the
impression that it prefers or sanctions a particular religion, or
religion generally. Our public schools must be hospitable to students
from a variety of backgrounds, regardless of their faith. A Christmas
concert dominated by religious carols, Christian music in the school
office, and a creationism video in science class with a theological
message are not reflective of religious neutrality, but instead appear
to be school endorsement of the Christian religion.

Celebrations of holidays and expressions of religious
belief enrich the personal and spiritual lives of many Americans. But
those practices belong in a house of worship, in private religious
schools, in the home, and in the heart - not in the public schools. Our
public schools should inculcate students with understanding and respect
for diversity, as well as a spirit of tolerance, acceptance and
inclusion.

A sturdy wall separating church and state is essential to
preserving and promoting freedom of religion in our increasingly
pluralistic nation.

Consequently, promotion of religious views, such as that
which took place in this Colorado public school, is inconsistent with
the guarantees of religious liberty in the First Amendment (ADL Not Out to Censor Christmas)

San Francisco, CA, May 15, 2008 … The Anti-Defamation
League (ADL) welcomed today's California Supreme Court decision
supporting the right of same-sex couples to marry. The court held that
under California law, the right to marry is a fundamental right,
integral to an individual's autonomy, and that banning same-sex couples
from marrying violates the California Constitution.

ADL issued the following statement:

We are pleased by the court's decision
supporting the right of same-sex couples to marry, and welcome this
reaffirmation of equal protection for all.

We are also gratified that the Court
agreed with our assertion that the law raised privacy issues, exposing
gay individuals "to detrimental treatment by those who continue to
harbor prejudices that have been rejected by California society at
large."

With this decision, California has taken a
significant step forward in the pursuit of individual liberty and
freedom from discrimination for all.

Yet it is, of course, that the two most prominent alleged Catholics in the United States of America, Vice President Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., and Timothy Michael "Cardinal" Dolan, "admire" the "work" of the Anti-Defamation League of B'Nai Brith. Biden does so because of ideology and politics. Dolan does so out of his commitment to conciliarism's false ecumenism, of which a desire to appease Talmudists is a fundamental cornerstone. Just look at the way in which Talmudists are able to lobby conciliar "popes" and how many of their "Reform" rabbis have received "papal" knighthoods and other honors (see Continuing toKnight Infidels and Forty Years Of Emboldening, Appeasing And Enabling Killers). Time simply does not permit the many ways in which conciliar doctrine, liturgy, morals and pastoral praxis have been tailored to please the descendants of the Khazars who converted to Talmudism at the end of the First Millennium. Suffice it to say that the current universal public face of apostasy, Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis, has a long, long track record in this regard (see, for example, Showing Us The Value Of A Conciliar Consecration).

Conciliarism itself its a Talmudic operation from beginning to end, which is why Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., can get away with boasting of his own support for the Talmudic agenda and how it is deeply ingrained in the psyche of the American experience without a word of reproach from the ecumaniacs in the Occupy Vatican Movement, starting with Bergoglio/Francis himself, who is trying to arrange a "peace meeting" with the leaders of the three "monotheistic" religions (see Francis could organise peace meeting between world’s three major religions, in Rome) in order to bring out "peace" in the Middle East that can achieved only by the conversion of non-Catholics, including Jews and Mohammedans, to the true Faith as the the fruit of the fulfillment of Our Lady's Fatima Message and thus the Triumph of her Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart.

Although much could be written about the control that Talmudists exercise in Hollywood and elsewhere in the entertainment, disinformation and educational spheres, suffice it to say that motion pictures, television, music and the print media have been used by the Synagogue of Satan itself to lull Catholic minds to sleep and to condition them to accept without question their "magisterial" teaching at a time when what presents itself as the Catholic Church believes that it is necessary to "dialogue" with, if not completely accommodate itself do, evil in the name of "religious liberty" and "legitimate diversity."

Quite contrary to the assertion made by Vice President Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., ten days ago now, the influence of Talmudism has been all bad, not all good, as Catholicism is the one and only foundation of personal and social order. Everything else is of the devil.

The Judeo-Masonic system of naturalism that it is indeed part of the fabric of the American founding and the engine of statism and moral degradation today was denounced with
such great Catholic eloquence by Louis Edouard "Cardinal" Pie, who was
the Bishop of Poitiers, France from from May 23, 1849, to the time of
his death on May 18, 1880:

Accordingly, the Bishop of Poitiers had always
fought against THE SEPARATION OF Church and State. Moreover, he opposed
all separations, that of reason and faith, of nature and grace, of
natural religion and revealed religion, the separation of the
philosopher and the Christian, of private man and public man. He saw in
all these [separations] a resurgence of Manichean dualism and he had
fought all these with, the supreme argument, the law formed by Christ.
Therefore, it is in all truth, writing to [Minister of the Interior] the
Count of Presigny, that he could render this testimony:

'We have nothing in common with the theorists of
disunion and opposition of two orders, temporal and spiritual, natural
and supernatural. We struggle, on the contrary, with all our strength
against these doctrines of separation which is leading to the denial of
religion itself and of revealed religion.'"

Fr. de St. Just returns at this point and
introduces us to what is perhaps Msgr. Pie's strongest language, with
regard to this entire subject:

"To this doctrine of the Church, which Msgr. Pie
brought to the mind of the rulers of nations, the liberals would oppose
acts favoring separation.

"Certain countries, Belgium and America,
for example, haven't they proclaimed the separation of Church and State,
and doesn't the Church enjoy a more complete liberty under such a
system?"

The same point is made in Monsignor Henri Delassus's Americanism and the Anti-Christian Conspiracy, available from Catholic Action Resource Center, which
is a masterful exposition of the pernicious influence of the Protestant
and Judeo-Masonic notions that flow into Americanism, which served as
such an important contributing factor to the whole ethos of conciliarism
itself, on Catholics in the United States of America and around the
world. Monsignor Delassus's work, which provides insights into Pope Leo
XIII's Apostolical Letter, Testem Benevolentiae Nostrae, to the
longtime Americanist Archbishop of Baltimore, James Cardinal Gibbons,
January 22, 1899, and connects Americanism to the worldwide effort on
the part of Talmudic Judaism to make war upon the Catholic Faith.

As Monsignor Delassus demonstrated, the
spirit of Father Isaac Thomas Hecker, the founder of the Society of Saint Paul, and other Americanists fit very
well into the goals of Talmudic Judaism to undermine the Faith of
individual Catholics so that their first loyalties would be to the false
concepts of Modernity, including Americanism, and then to their Church,
which, if all went according to the plan, would itself one day "adopt"
the false concepts of Modernity and make its "peace" with the
revolutions of 1776 and 1789:

How so? Fr. Hecker tells us: "A call is
made to men who possess this new synthesis of truth who are able to
solve the problems of eliminating antagonisms, of being reconciled with
the need of our era; of men who will take hold of all the aspirations of
modern genius effected by science, of social activity, of politics, of
spirituality (accordingly, spirituality itself would be called upon to
defend the Church and to procure her universal triumph), of religion,
and of the transformation of everything by means of the defense and
universal triumph for the Church" (The Life of Fr. Hecker.)

Those who are not made aware of the
world's current direction by the information that they derive from the
newspaper--and this is the vast majority--will undoubtedly be surprised,
in speaking to them of "Americanism" and of an "American Catholicism,"
we begin by calling their attention to the "Universal Israelite
Alliance," entering through there upon a question, the Jewish Question,
that presently fascinates the world and that is studied under every
point of view, but which does not take into account, appears to be
removed from, American Catholicism. This is nevertheless not imaginary
on our part. The Universal Israelite Alliance is the center, the home,
the bond of the antichristian conspiracy, by which Americanism seems to
us to provide a support that it is not aware of which would not be given
if it were understood and upon which this book is determined to direct
its attention ...

One of the most malicious men of this
[19th] century, the Jew [Jules Isaac] Cremieux, who was made grand
Master of the French Grand Orient, who profited by the Revolution of
1848 [in France] by being raised to the Ministry of Justice, and by the
disasters of 1870 which gave French citizenship to all the Jews of
Algeria, founded in 1860 a cosmopolitan society which he endowed with
the name of Universal Israelite Alliance. This association is
not, as its name would have one believe, one of international Jewry, a
bond to better facilitate links between Jews scattered around the
surface of the globe; its aims bear upon something much more higher. It
is an association open to all men without distinction of nationality nor
of religion, under the high direction of Israel.

In order to be convinced of this, it is sufficient to open the publication that represents it, The Israelite Archives.
"The Universal Israelite Alliance," it says there (xxx, pp. 514-515,
for the year 1861), "must enter into all religions as it has penetrated
all countries. I call to our association the brothers of every religion,
that they would come to us! ... That enlightened men of all cults will
unite themselves with this Universal Israelite Alliance" (ibid.) And why? "To
break down the barriers which separate that which ONE DAY MUST BE
UNITED. See there, Messieurs, the beauty, the great mission of Our
Universal Israelite Alliance" (ibid.)

Profiting from their dispersion over
every point of the globe, the Jews wish to be in humanity as a sort of
leaven, in order to make of human society, presently divided into
nations and various religions, "one sole and solid fraternity,"--the
Israelite Archives say it less hypocritically: "A Jerusalem of new
order, a holy extension from the East to the West, that must EXIT IN
ITSELF in the double city of the Caesars and the Popes" (XXV, PP.
600-651, 1861) ...

The Jewish race "Jerusalem" intends to
establish its reign over the entire world. "East and West," by
establishing its authority upon the ruins of all existing powers.
"Caesars and Popes." All authority must disappear in order to make way
for the domination of Juda, which "will take the place" of all the
existing powers in the spiritual order as well as in the temporal order
...

... We see here that other idea advanced, the idea of the United States of Europe, parallel to the United States of America ...

Here again, one could compare a strange
accord between the ideas of the Americanists and the tendencies of those
who obey the promptings given by the Universal Israelite Alliance. A
most ardent promoter of Americanism, in a discourse given in 1894 to the
International Scientific Congress of Catholics at Brussels, had this to
say:

"We have thought that the opportunity has been provided us of giving to the ENTIRE WORLD a great lesson.
When we study the map of Europe, we see there, marks of small
divisions. Lines traversing these maps in every sense. They do not
indicate only territorial divisions, they signify also: jealousy,
hatred, hostility, divisions of hearts, that commits God knows how many
millions of armed men for the destruction of the world. Thus, from all
these nations, Providence has allowed immigration among us. All nations
find themselves at home here [in the USA]; they have been living among
themselves, fraternally, without any hostility. This is the privilege
that God has granted to America, that of destroying the traditions of national jealousies that of that you have perpetuated in Europe, by melting them down in America unity."

Read on: "Americanism" [this pompous
Americanist continues] "has received from God the mission of giving to
the entire world this lesson: the time has come to put an end to the
past: abolish frontiers, place all the people in the melting pot of the
rights of man by the molding of united humanity, as we [in America] have
been founded, we emigrants from all countries, in American unity. And
peace shall reign in the world."

Yes, the peace of the slave under the tyranny of one man or of one race.

As of all the other ideas of the
Americanists, that of he abolition of frontiers seems to appeal to our
Christian democrats. . . .

So then, if the Talmudists [Orthodox
Jews] differ from the liberals [Reform Jews], it is only upon knowing
which is the better means to employ in order to accomplish the mission
that Israel claims to have received ... The Talmudists continue to await
a messiah of flesh and bone, who will make them masters of the
universe; the liberals say that they do not have any other messiah to
expect than the Revolution, "the principles" of which are dissolving of
all society and preparing it for their rule. In order to spread these
modern "principles," in order to have them bring about the fruits that
they are awaiting, they deem it necessary to separate themselves from
those observances to which their fathers had been attached, when they
believed that their fidelity would hasten the coming of the personal
messiah. This is a cumbersome burden, and what's more the Jew of this
old way could not "make himself acceptable." He would nevertheless make
himself acceptable in the eyes of the people among whom he wished to
exercise a "proselytization."

And in what does this conversion consist?
Is it to encourage the faithful of various religions to enter into
Judaism? The Jews have never had the thought of making a conversion of
this sort; they are a people a race apart, "the premier aristocracy of
the world," the only ones who are truly men; they would never hear of
elevating beings such as those who are human only in appearance ...

In the first place [The Universal
Israelite Alliance] acts upon kings and parliaments in order to apply
pressure on them, "this singular, indefatigable influence" that
[Gourgenot] des Mousseaux already noted in 1869 [see, The Jew, Judaism and The Judaization of the Christian People, by Mousseaux].

What over and above does it demand? LAICIZATION.

There is no person, who is not blind, who
cannot fail to see the prodigious efforts that are being made over the
last century towards secularization, that is to say, efforts to remove
all religious character from everywhere and everyone. Already, on the
very origin of the Revolution, [Count Joseph] de Maistre, had remarked
that his had been its essential character. "Examine," he said, "all the
enterprises of this century, you have to see (these men of the
Revolution) constantly occupied in the separation from divinity." It
would take too long to show here the many aspects under which the
question of laicization or secularization is presented: it spreads
itself among all, and in every governmental organ, accordingly, all the
forces of society are employed in the success of this work ...

Could Americanism, itself also, have come
to lend itself to this work that is certainly not intentional? This is
what we have already said is to be feared. It is well to examine this
thing more closely.

What is certain, what is incontestable,
is that between the Jewish spirit and the Americanist spirit there is a
point of contact with the principles of '89 [i.e., the principles of the
French Revolution].

We have heard the Jews proclaim and
declare the course they are drawing. For the Americans their social and
even religious state rests entirely upon these principles; they highly
praise them, and the Americanists themselves would have us that
"American ideas are those in which GOD wants all the civilized people of
our time to be at home." So they conscientiously make of themselves
evangelists." ( Monsignor Henri Delassus, Americanism and the Anti-Christian Conspiracy,
translated by Mr. Daniel Leonardi and published by Mr. Hugh Akins of
Catholic Action Resources Center, Orlando, Florida, October, 2007--first
printing in France, 1899, pp. 2-8.)

One sees in this extended
passage from Monsignor Delassus's book some very prophetic insights into
how the spirit of Talmudic Judaism, which is of the essence of
Judeo-Masonry, was able to exploit the Americanist embrace of religious
indifferentism and naturalism and semi-Pelagianism to lead directly to
the Modernist spirit concerning Church-State relations that helped to
shape conciliarism itself.

This is why it is so important for Talmudic
organizations to insist that the only Catholics who are to be
considered "safe," that is, those who are not deemed by Talmudic
organizations to be "anti-Semitic," are those who adhere entirely to the
falsehoods of the counterfeit church of conciliarism and to the spirit
of the Novus Ordo service. Those Catholics who even dare to
think about holding on to "past" concepts that have been repudiated by
the Modernist warfare against the nature of dogmatic truth and all of
the errors that flow therefrom (including false ecumenism and the clever
devices used to defend it by means of the Vatican Ecumenical Directory
and the "new evangelization of Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II and Joseph
Ratzinger/Benedict XVI) must be hounded, identified and tarred and
feathered as anti-Semites as they refuse to consent to the "new world
order" wrought by the convergence of Americanism and Zionism and
Modernism and Protestantism and all forms of naturalism that are
represented so well in conciliar thought in what can be termed
"conciliarspeak."

A few more passages from Monsignor Delassus's book will help to illustrate these points:

We hasten to say however that if these
undying principles are advocated and propagated by the Jews and by the
Americanists, they are put forward under quite different aspects.

The Jews hope to spread "liberal and
humanitarian Israelitism," the Americanists "a new era for the Church,"
"an era that could hardly be conceived," so fertile and beautiful would
She be! ...

Speaking of the false principle upon
which the American Republic is constituted, separation of Church and
State, Leo XIII said: "In effect, to wish that the State should be
separated from the Church, is to wish, by a logical consequence, that
the Church should be reduced to the liberty of living according to
COMMON LAW. This separation, it is true, prevails in certain countries.
It is a state of affairs that, though it has ITS NUMEROUS AND GRAVE
INCONVENIENCES, still offers some advantages, especially when the
legislator, in a fortunate inconsistency, is still not apt to be
inspired by other than Christian principles; and the advantages, though
THEY ARE NOT ABLE TO JUSTIFY THE FALSE PRINCIPE OF SEPARATION, NOR TO
AUTHORIZE ITS DEFENSE, nevertheless they are worthy of toleration in
order to, in practice, avoid something worse of all" (Leo XIII, Au milieu des solicitudes, February 16, 1892, on Church-State relations.)

A Belgian priest, who exercised the holy
ministry in America, wrote in 1896 to the Courier of Brussels: "We are
burdened here [in the USA] with something called Broadmindedness. It is not easy to render this word correctly in French. One could say that generally it means: "A quite great liberalism, an outrageous tolerance.(Monsignor Delassus, pp. 8-9.)

Yes, for the likes of Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., Timothy Michael Dolan, Kurt Koch, Walter Kasper, Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, Sean O'Malley and Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis, to name just a few, the real enemies of "progress" and "peace" among men of "good will" in the world are those scattered Catholics who actually take seriously and are committed to promoting the Social Reign of Christ the King that was overthrown by the Protestant Revolution and which has been buried, at least for the time being, by the forces of Judeo-Masonry.

Father Fahey wrote the following in this regard in The Kingship of Christ and the Conversion of the Jewish Nation:

As I was not able to bring out this
book when it was originally written, it has been laid aside for years.
In the meantime, the need for setting forth the full doctrine of the
Kingship of Christ has been forcibly brought home to me by the confusion
created in minds owing to the use of the term “Anti-Semitism.” The
Hitlerite naturalistic or anti-supernatural régime in Germany gave to
the world the odious spectacle of a display of Anti-Semitism, that is,
of hatred of the Jewish Nation. Yet all the propaganda about that
display of Anti-Semitism should not have made Catholics forget the
existence of age-long Jewish Naturalism or Anti-Supernaturalism.
Forgetfulness of the disorder of Jewish Naturalistic opposition to
Christ the King is keeping Catholics blind to the danger that is arising
from the clever extension of the term “Anti-Semitism,” with all its
war-connotation in the minds of the unthinking, to include any form of
opposition to the Jewish Nation’s naturalistic aims. For the leaders of
the Jewish Nation, to stand for the rights of Christ the King is
logically to be “anti-Semitic.”

In March, 1917, Pope Benedict XV wrote to the Archbishop of Tours: “In
the midst of the present upheavals, it is important to repeat to men
that by her divine institution the Catholic Church is the only ark of
salvation for the human race . . . . Accordingly, it is more seasonable
than ever to teach . . . that the truth which liberates, not only
individuals, but societies, is supernatural truth in all its fulness and
in all its purity, without attenuation, diminution or compromise: in a
word, exactly as Our Lord Jesus Christ delivered it to the world.”
These sublime words of the Vicar of Christ have nerved me to do all in
my power to set forth the opposition of every form of Naturalism,
including Jewish Naturalism, to the supernatural Reign of Christ the
King. In addition, for over twenty years I have been offering the Holy
Sacrifice of the Mass every year, on the Feasts of the Resurrection,
Corpus Christi, SS. Peter and Paul and the Assumption of Our Blessed
Mother, for the acceptance by the Jewish Nation of the Divine Plan for
order. Thus I have been striving to follow the example of our Divine
Master. Blessed Pius X insists that “though Jesus was kind to those who
had gone astray, and to sinners, He did not respect their erroneous
convictions, however sincere they appeared to be.”the need of combining
firmness in the proclamation of the integral truth with loving charity
towards those in error is insisted on, even more emphatically, by Pope
Pius XI: “Comprehending and merciful charity towards the erring,” he
writes, “and even towards the contemptuous, does not mean and can not
mean that you renounce in any way the proclaiming of, the insisting on,
and the courageous defence of the truth and its free and unhindered
application to the realities about you. The first and obvious duty the
priest owes to the world about him is service to the truth, the whole
truth, the unmasking and refutation of error in whatever form or
disguise it conceals itself.”

A day will come when the Jewish Nation
will cease to oppose order and will turn in sorrow and repentance to Him
Whom they rejected before Pilate. That will be a glorious triumph for
the Immaculate Heart of Our Blessed Mother. Until that day
dawns, however, their naturalistic opposition to the True Supernatural
Order of the world must be exposed and combated. (Father Denis Fahey, Foreword, The Kingship of Christ and the Conversion of the Jewish Nation.)

This is our duty as
Catholics.

We are not to support the lords of conciliarism who want to
be loved by the Jews but who are in fact their bitter enemies as they seek not to convert them to the true Faith, outside of which there is no salvation and without which there can be no true social order, and are thus not of God.

We
are not to support the witting or unwitting dupes of naturalism in the
blathering world of talk radio and cable television. We are to stand for
the rights of Christ the King openly and unapologetically without fear
of the consequences as we pray very fervently for the conversion of
those who adhere to the Talmud and as we bear ourselves kindly toward
those of their number whose God's Holy Providence places in our paths,
providing them with truly blessed Green Scapulars as we pray "Immaculate
Heart of Mary, pray for us now and at the hour of our death" for each
of them by name without fail every day. God wills the good of all men,
the ultimate expression of which is the salvation of their immortal
souls as members of the Catholic Church. It is no act of true Charity
to reaffirm one in a false religion by acts of omission or commission.
Indeed, it is a dereliction of our duties as Catholics not to perform
the Spiritual Works of Mercy for those who are in the grip of the devil
evil though they may not realize it themselves.

Do we desire to be loved by the
Jews? No, I am not referring at this point to adherents of the Talmud.
Not necessarily. I am referring, however, to the desire of fallen
creatures to be loved and respected by the world, which is so much in
the grip of the influence of the false, diabolical currents of
Protestantism and Judeo-Masonry.

Each of us has made our compromises with
the spirit of the world, the flesh and the devil. It is hard, humanly
speaking, to oppose the world and its false currents all the time as
one's relatives and friends and acquaintances and co-workers (and in
today's crazy world where many Catholics spend most of their waking
hours in chat rooms where complete strangers can give one much merit by
castigating you without ever having spoken to you beforehand) denounce
one for being "too strict" or "unrealistic" in insisting upon firm
standards of modesty (see Revolutions Have Consequences, part two from three years ago now), for refusing to accept most motion pictures or the diabolical horror that is "rock music" or the
naturalistic farce that is American electoral politics and public
policy-making. Fine. Let them say what they want. Who cares? One of the
ways by which we can make reparation to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus
through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary for our past desire to be
loved and respected and honored by a world that is in the grip of
Judeo-Masonry is to accept the humiliations that come our way with joy
and gratitude as coming from the loving hand of God Himself.

Remember, the Pharisees of Our Lord's day
did not act on their own. Our own sins, having transcended time, played
a large role in motivating them to act as they did in hating the very
One Who had created them and was about to redeem them so that they could
be sanctified as members of His Catholic Church. We play the part of
those very same Pharisees whenever we turn away from Our Lord and His
true Church by means of sinful thoughts, words, desires and deeds. We
play the part of the adherents of the Talmud today when we refuse to
speak as Catholics in public life and when we plunge headlong in the
traps of naturalism posed by the devil as we spend time listening to the
babbling inanities of naturalists rather than praying more Rosaries as
Our Lady requested of Jacinta and Francisco Marto and Lucia dos Santos
ninety-four years ago now.

Dom Prosper Gueranger, O.S.B., emphasized
this point in his reflection on the Feast of the Seven Dolors of Our
Lady in Passion Week:

How many there are, who once drank at
the vein of living waters, and afterwards turned away to seek to quench
their thirst in the muddy waters of the world, which can only make them
thirst the more! Let them tremble at the punishment that came
upon the Jews; for, unless they return to the Lord their God, they must
fall into those devouring and eternal flames, where even a drop of water
is refused. Jesus, the by mouth of His prophet, tells the Jews that the
day of affliction shall overtake them; and when, later on, He comes to
them Himself, He forewarns them, that the tribulation which is to fall
on Jerusalem, in punishment for her deicide, shall be so great that such
hath not been from the beginning of the world until now, neither shall
be.(2)-{St. Matt. xxiv. 21} But if God so rigorously avenged the Blood
of His Son against a city that was so long a place of the habitation of
His glory, and against a people that He had preferred to all others,
will He spare the sinner who, in spite of the Church's entreaties,
continues obstinate in his evil ways? Jerusalem had filled up
the measure of her iniquities; we, also have a measure of sin, beyond
which the justice of God will not permit us to go. Let us sin no more:
let us fill up that other measure, the measure of good works. Let us
pray for those sinners who are to pass these days of grace without being
converted; let us pray that this divine Blood, which is to be so
generously given to them, but which they are about again to trample
upon, may again spare them. (Reflections for the Fifth Friday of Lent)

As Our Lord told Saint Margaret Mary Alacoque, it is the sins of Catholics that grieve His Most Sacred Heart as much as did the rejection of His
own people during His Passion and Death as we, the members of His
Catholic Church, have turned away so frequently from the supernatural
helps that He gives us through the loving hands of His Most Blessed
Mother, she who is the Mediatrix of All Graces:

Consider that it was no less afflicting and sad for Jesus Christ to
see the ingratitude of the majority of the faithful, who would have
only coldness and indifference for Him in the Sacrament of His love. He saw the little esteem, nay, even the contempt with which they would
treat this greatest proof of His love. He saw that no matter what He
might do to be loved by the faithful, even dwelling always amongst them
in the Blessed Eucharist, neither this excess of His love, nor His
benefits, nor His very presence would be capable of making the greater
part of them love Him or would prevent them from forgetting Him. he saw
that those churches in which He was to be sacramentally present would be
left for most of the time without adorers. He saw what little
reverence, nay, what disrespect would be shown in His presence. He saw
clearly how the greater part of His followers, who spend long
hours in vain amusement and useless visits and complete idleness, would
rarely find a quarter of an hour to spend before Him in the Blessed
Sacrament. He knew how many others would visit Him only under compulsion
and without either devotion or reverence. And finally, He saw the very
small number who would eagerly visit Him and devoutly adore Him. He saw
clearly that the greater number take no more notice of Him than if He
were not really present in the Blessed Sacrament or than if He were a
person of no consequence.

The harsh treatment which He received from the
Jews, Gentiles and heretics was indeed very painful to Him, but they
were His open enemies. But could we ever thought it possible that those
who recognize His benefits, that those who make profession of being
faithful to Him, that His own children should not only be insensible to
His benefits and in no way touched with compassion at the sight of the
grief caused by such contempt, but that they should treat Him with
contempt by their irreverences and sacrileges? Our Saviour might well
say: "If pagans and Turks and infidels had treated Me so, I might have
endured it." "for if my enemy had reviled me, I would verily have borne
it". (Ps. 54:13), but that Christians, Catholics whom I have not only
redeemed, but have fed and nourished with my Body and Blood, should have
nothing but contempt for Me, that they should treat Me with
ingratitude, is too much. "But thou a man of one mind, my guide and my
familiar: who didst take sweetmeats together with me! (Ps. 54: 14-15)

What must be the sentiments of this most generous
and tender Heart of Jesus which has so loved men, and which finds in the
hearts of those men only coldness and contempt? "I am become a reproach
among my enemies." (Ps. 30: 12). If after exposing Myself to the
contempt and hatred of My enemies in the midst of the outrages which I
suffer, I could at least find a large number of faithful friends who
would console Me! But it is quite the contrary: "They that saw me
without fled from me." (Ps. 30:12) The greater number, seeing that I
have disguised Myself under the feeble appearance of bread in order to
have the pleasure of dwelling among men, abandon Me and forget Me as a
person who has no place in their hearts, "I am forgotten as one dead
from the heart." (Ps. 30:13) (Father John Croiset, The Devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, republished by TAN Books and Publishers.)

Father Charles Arminjon related the attitude that
Catholics must have in the midst of the storms of the present world, a world
that will pass away soon enough, by contrasting the worldly man with the
man of Faith:

One thing is certain: there has never been, and
never will be, moral sublimity, heroic holiness, or virtue worthy of the
name that does not have its principle or draw its growth and strength
in suffering freely accepted or dauntlessly undergone.

How is it that our will is often wavering and
undecided, that our life is strew-n with such strange fluctuations and
such unhappy fickleness, that we are so dejected by insignificant
things, that an inconsiderate word is said to us, or a change in the
serenity of the sky, is enough to make us go from the height of joy to
the depths of gloom? The cause of these fluctuations and changes is
simply the repugnance and instinctive horror we feel toward suffering.

By the assiduous care we take to refuse the
slightest hardship and the least injury, and to keep away from us
anything that seems even in the smallest degree demanding, we create for
ourselves a state of abject bondage. Our heart falls under the sway of
as many tyrants as there are impressions, each of which in turn grips us
in its influence. No virtue can subsist in such fickle souls, no high
position is compatible with a character that drifts along with ever
current and turn of fortune.

Thus, the man in this state turns aside from stern
duties and becomes a slave to the most futile fantasies. Forgetting that
human life is a reality and not fiction, he seeks diversion in
frivolous amusements, squanders his best years in pleasures and idleness
and boredom, and consumes fruitlessly the talent that God had entrusted
to him. In this enfeebling frame of mind, a man need only come before
him with threatening words and the power to interfere with his repose,
interests, or pleasures, and that man will at once be his master, will
have full power to subject him to a degrading bondage or to unspeakable
tortures.

How far removed from the inexhaustible pettiness of
these flabby, effeminate souls is the firm, high-minded attitude of him
who, by dint of doing battle with suffering, has become, as it were,
insensitive to its wounds and blows? How fine it is to see him serene
and majestic amidst storms and the agitation of passions, fulfilling the
words of the wise man: "Whatsoever shall befall the just man, it shall
not make him sad."

Calmly he [the man of Faith] hears the noise of
revolutions, and sees republics and dynasties pass; it is as if the
scene of men's vain and conflicting interests lay in the nether regions
beneath his feet. No disturbance on this earth moves him, because he had
learned to see events in the infinite wisdom that governs all thing by
its providence, and which permits evil only in order to draw good from
it by a striking manifestation. He carries within himself a kind of
sanctuary of peace and happiness. Mankind and the elements combined are
powerless to offend or harm him. Is he sent into exile? he will reply
with a great bishop" For me, the whole earth is my native land and my
exile. Is he stripped of his goods? He has learned how to possess them
without permitting them to enthrall his heart. Is he put to death?
Death, for him, is the transfiguration to a better life, emancipation
from his sufferings.

Such was the serenity and heroic constancy of St. John Chrysostom, banished by Eudoxia, Empress of Constantinople:

When I was fleeing the town, I did not feel my
misfortune at all, and I was interiorly inundated with the most
indescribable consolations. If he Empress sends me into exile--I said to
myself--I shall consider that the earth and all that it contains is the
Lord's. If she has me thrown into the sea, I shall remember Jonah. If
she orders me to be stoned, I shall be the companion of St. Stephen. If
she has been beheaded, I shall have the glory of St. John the Baptist.
If she strips me of what I possess, I shall reflect that I came forth
naked from the bowels of the earth, and must return to it naked and
stripped of everything. (Father Charles Arminjon, The End of the Present World and the Mysteries of the Future Life, translated by Susan Conroy and Peter McEnerny. Manchester, New Hampshire: Sophia Institute Press, 2008, pp. 282-284.)

Let us, therefore, trust in
Our Lady, whose Immaculate Heart was pierced by Seven Swords of Sorrow,
to help us to promote Catholic dogmatism over the madness of "dialogue,"
remaining perfectly calm in the storms around us as we pray as many
Rosaries each day as our state-in-life permits, eager to suffer and to
suffer even some more as the consecrated slaves of Christ the King
through that same Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary, she who is Our
Immaculate Queen.

If we are faithful to the
revelations of the Most Sacred Heart given by Our Blessed Lord and
Saviour Jesus Christ to such mystics as Saint Gertrude the Great and
Saint John Eudes and to Saint Margaret Mary Alacoque, then we can be confident
that these great saints will intercede for us from Heaven so that we can
imitate their complete self-surrender to the Sacred Heart of Jesus as
we, who have been given the privilege to live after Our Lord sent His
Most Blessed Mother to the Cova da Iria in Fatima, Portugal, to
establish devotion her Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart, attempt to lead
all souls, including adherents of the Talmud, to the font of Divine Mercy through the Immaculate Heart of
Mary out of which It was formed and to which It is perfected united.

We are loved by the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus. As
clients of the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary, out which that
Heart of all hearts was formed, may it be the singular longing of our
own hearts to be content that this all-encompassing, matchless love of
Love Incarnate rather than compromise on any point of the Holy Faith at
any time for any reason, no less to do so to be loved by the Jews, that
is to be part of a world that is in the grip of the devil.