Real prize for Apple, Google, Nokia maps is data insight

on Monday January 21, 2013 @ 3:16

Mapping is a thankless endeavour. It's time and labour intensive to traverse, capture, analyse, and present every nook and cranny of the globe. It's also expensive. New roads, buildings, and entire cities are constantly popping up, challenging the best efforts of every mapping firm.

Why are maps so
important to the tech giants?

Given all the headaches, why
has mapping moved to the centre of some of the most contentious fights in tech,
including Apple's escalating feud with Google? Mobile software competitors - Amazon,
Apple, Google, Microsoft, Nokia, and a host of others -all share the same hunch
that maps sit at the core of our digital future.

The fight means that the world
is now better mapped than at any time in the history of civilization. Nokia's
cartographic wizards assert that its maps cover more countries, receive inputs
from more sources (80,000 data feeds), and are updated more quickly (up to 2.4
million times a day) than those of any other service.

In 2008, Google launched Ground
Truth, a massive project that uses a fleet of airplanes, automobiles, and data
collected from public and private agencies to create a proprietary location
database of 40 countries around the world. There are product innovations such
as photo-realistic 3-D maps, 360-degree panoramic views, street views, and
transit and turn-by-turn directions.

But so far, these companies all seem to be doing this work on faith, hoping that someday it will pay off financially. Google, for example, won't say how it generates revenue from mapping. Instead, it explains its interest in maps as part of the larger mission to organize the world's information. "One-fifth of our queries ask for some kind of local component - in that way, maps have always been a part of search," says Manik Gupta, senior product manager in charge of Ground Truth.

Google

Maps also factor into Google's highest-profile current and future projects. In the wake of Apple's debacle, Google Maps has become a key selling point for choosing an Android phone over an iPhone. It's also built into Google Now, Android's Siri-like artificial-intelligence personal assistant.

Then there's the robotic-car project, the sci-fi specs known as Google Glass, and the opportunities in local advertising - all of which can be enhanced by improving Maps. Google may never be able to isolate the revenue coming from Maps, the way it can from, say, display advertising. But its products would likely not be as good without them.

Nokia

Nokia, on the other hand, can
point to actual sales: It licenses its data to sites such as Amazon, Bing, and
Yahoo as well as to most of the world's auto manufacturers. Nokia says its
cartography can be found in four-fifths of dashboard navigation systems, and
those deals helped it rack up $1.4 billion in map sales in 2011.

That sum would be impressive if
not for the fact that Nokia's mapping division has lost money every year since
2007, when the company got into the business by acquiring Navteq for $8.1
billion. In 2011, that $1.4 billion in revenue was negated entirely by a
one-time $1.4 billion charge due to a revaluation of the "projected
financial performance" of the division. Spending on research and
development drove the 2011 operating loss to $2 billion.

Although Nokia’s mapping division has lost money every year since 2007, it’s keen to have maps pay off for the company. It, too, has seized on Apple's failed launch by releasing an iOS app, branded Here Maps, to woo iPhone users disaffected by Apple Maps. "We would love for iOS users to be more aware of Nokia," says says Hans Peter Brondmo, Nokia's head of new product innovation. "Maybe they'll look at our great maps app and next time around decide to take a harder look at our Lumia phone." Using maps to drive hardware sales would certainly help Nokia recoup its losses.

Apple

Then there's Apple, whose
motivations for getting into mapping are unclear. The company, which declined
to discuss its mapping plans publicly, ostensibly decided to build its own maps
to control the iPhone user experience. But the move has created the opposite of
its intended effect. Now Apple's own iPhones and iPads are a new battleground
between the company and Google, Microsoft, and Nokia.

While Apple certainly has the resources to build the world's best maps, it has yet to marshal them like its rivals. "If you look at what Google and Nokia have had to invest, Apple is not even scratching the surface," says Nokia's Brondmo. But time, more than money, may be Apple's enemy. "Could Apple decide to build the level of worldwide global coverage that we have?" Brondmo wonders. "I expect they could. But it would take them years, maybe even decades to catch up."

Data Insights

All these companies will keep
pouring money into cartography because of its inherent, unknowable promise.
Inevitably, though perhaps not anytime soon, any successful effort to wring big
money from mobile devices seems likely to depend on knowing exactly where users
are and where they want to go. Mapping requires, and creates, huge troves of
user data.

The bet is that the data will
lead to insights into user behaviour that can then be turned in to new
products. Or, failing that, to methods for predicting customer actions in order
to serve up better ads. "We think there's a lot of potential," says
Matthew Quinlan, Bing's maps chief, echoing his peers' feelings. "Future
potential."