Send me email updates about messages I've received on the site and the latest news from The CafeMom Team.
By signing up, you certify that you are female and accept the Terms of Service and have read the
Privacy Policy.

Farmer's Fight With Monsanto Reaches The Supreme Court

This week, the Supreme Court will take up a classic David-and-Goliath case. On one side, there's a 75-year-old farmer in Indiana named Vernon Hugh Bowman; on the other, the agribusiness giant Monsanto.

The farmer is fighting the long reach of Monsanto's patents on seeds — but he's up against more than just Monsanto. The biotech and computer software industries are taking Monsanto's side.

Bowman also is battling a historic shift that's transformed the nation's seed business over the past 20 years.

Despite
all that, Bowman seems remarkably cheerful about his situation.
"Confrontation does not take a toll on me!" he says. "You and me can
argue about the Bible; we can argue about religion. I'll pound my fist
and we can argue all day, and I won't lose a bit of sleep at night!"

Bowman
is leaning back in an easy chair, where he says he also sleeps at
night. He lives alone in a modest white frame house outside the small
town of Sandborn, in southwestern Indiana.

Out back, there's an array of old farm equipment collected during decades of growing corn and soybeans.

Bowman
is wearing a Monsanto hat. It's probably an ironic gesture, but in
fact, he's been a pleased and loyal customer of the company's seeds. He
thinks the genes that Monsanto inserted into soybeans are just great.
They let soybeans survive the country's most popular weedkiller: glyphosate, also known as Roundup. He can spray that one chemical to get rid of the weeds without harming his crop.

"It made things so much simpler and better. No question about that," he says.

Bowman uses these "Roundup Ready"
soybeans for his main crop, which he plants in the spring, and he signs
a standard agreement not to save any of his harvest and replant it the
next year. Monsanto demands exclusive rights to supply that seed.

Bowman bought ordinary soybeans from this small grain elevator and used them for seed.

Dan Charles/NPR

But here's where Bowman got into trouble: He also likes to plant a
second crop of soybeans, later in the year, in fields where he just
harvested wheat.

Those late-season soybeans are risky. The
yield is smaller. Bowman decided that for this crop, he didn't want to
pay top dollar for Monsanto's seed. "What I wanted was a cheap source of
seed," he says.

Starting in 1999, he bought some ordinary
soybeans from a small grain elevator where local farmers drop off their
harvest. "They made sure they didn't sell it as seed. Their ticket said,
'Outbound grain," says Bowman.

He knew that these beans
probably had Monsanto's Roundup Ready gene in them, because that's
mainly what farmers plant these days. But Bowman didn't think Monsanto
controlled these soybeans anymore, and in any case, he was getting a
motley collection of different varieties, hardly a threat to Monsanto's
seed business. "I couldn't imagine that they'd give a rat's behind," he
snorts.

Bowman told his neighbors what he was doing. It turned out that Monsanto did, in fact, care.

"He wanted to use our technology without paying for it," says David Snively, Monsanto's general counsel.

Monsanto took Bowman to court, and Bowman was ordered to pay Monsanto $84,000 for infringing the company's patent.

Bowman
appealed. To the surprise of many, the highest court in the land agreed
to hear his case. "I'm not a-gonna give in! Because I think I've done
nothing wrong!" says Bowman.

His lawyers, who are representing
him for free, have come up with a legal argument for why he did nothing
wrong. If they succeed in persuading the court, it could pull the rug
out from under Monsanto, and some other industries, too.

Bowman's lawyer, Mark Walters
from the firm of Frommer Lawrence and Haug, says there's a very old
principle in patent law: If you buy something that's covered by a patent
— let's say it's a cell phone — you own it, outright. "You're allowed
to put it on Craigslist and sell it, you're allowed to use it for your
'ordinary pursuits of life' is the quote from some of the old cases that
we're relying on."

It's a valuable principle, Walters says.
"Imagine how commerce would work if patents owners could come out of
nowhere and surprise purchasers and tell them, 'Oh, you need to pay me a
royalty, because I own a patent on this thing that you just bought.'"

So
according to this principle of "patent exhaustion," Bowman bought that
seed and can do with it what he wants. Patent holders have no right to
stop him.

Monsanto's David Snively,
for his part, says this argument completely misses the point. Yes, we
can buy an iPhone and do whatever we want with it, "but we're not going
to go out and make copies of the iPhone and put Apple out of business,"
he says.

That's what Bowman did, says Snively. When he planted this patented seed, he made copies of it.

In fact, he says, if farmers were allowed to do this with patented seeds, the patents would be worthless.

Hans
Sauer, deputy general counsel at BIO, says many biotech products are a
lot like seeds. "They are easily replicated. They are difficult to make,
but once created they are relatively easy to reproduce." The same is
true of computer software.

Nels Kasey, co-owner of Great Heart Seed, with some of his company's soybean varieties.

Dan Charles/NPR

But these are new technologies. Farmers' seeds are old; they're
the original self-replicating technology, and for centuries, nobody
tried to claim them as intellectual property.

That's one reason why Monsanto's patents and lawsuits against farmers have stirred up so much anger and received so much attention.

What's
less well known, however, is that the practice of patenting seeds has
moved far beyond Monsanto and other biotech companies.

It's standard practice now even among small companies like Great Heart Seed, in Paris, Ill.

Great
Heart Seed's warehouse is filled to the rafters with white bags of
soybean seed. The company sells 45 different varieties in all. Some grow
better in the south, others in the north. Most have Monsanto's Roundup
resistance genes, while others do not.

Yet all of these
varieties are patented. "Nearly everything out there has a patent on it
now," says Nels Kasey, one of the Great Heart's owners.

Twenty
years ago, that wasn't the case. Many seed dealers sold "public"
varieties that came from breeders at universities like Iowa State or
Purdue.

Today, most new varieties come from private companies,
and even universities acquire patents on most of the varieties that they
do release.

Farmers aren't supposed to save and replant those seeds, either.

Kasey
says, the new system gives soybean breeders and seed companies more
profits, and a stronger incentive to create and sell even better plant
varieties. "I'm really proud of the varieties that we have today. When I
started in this company, you had a handful of varieties. Today, there's
more money in it, more profit in it, so I can support 45 lines," he
says.

Those seeds, though, are also more expensive. Soybean
seeds have tripled in price over the past 20 years. And a farmer like
Bowman who just wants some cheap, generic seeds can't easily find them.

Bowman
can see towering bins filled with soybeans all around southwestern
Indiana, but according to the seed companies, he can't plant any of
them.

In fact, after Monsanto took Bowman to court, his search
for unrestricted seeds took him all the way to Ohio, one of the very few
places in the country where the state still distributes non-patented soybean varieties.

Bowman
acquired some of that seed — a variety called Dennison — and grew it
last year. He saved part of his harvest. Those soybeans are now sitting
in an old combine in a shed behind his house.

If the Supreme Court rules against him, Bowman can still use those beans for seed this year.

You know, he did it KNOWING that what he was doing wasn't right. He KNOWS by signing the agreement that he's not to use those beans for seed....and he KNEW those beans that he bought were the kind that were not supposed to be used for seed because they were beans from Monsanto seeds. Logistically, I can see where Monsanto is right, no matter how much I hate them.

Wanna save seeds for the next crop? Take the time to find heirloom varieties.

Did
you know you could patent a rectangle with rounded corners? And that
Apple and Sony are currently suing each other in two different countries
over infringing on this patent?

I understand what you are saying about this case, but the ability to patent DNA has a lot more unintended(?) consequences than just these GMO seeds...especially for stem cell research, organ transplants and possibly even fertility treatments.

And as far as heirlooms go, Monsanto is applying for patents on these too. You can basically apply for and own a patent on about anything...Pretty soon, if the courts continue to rule for Monsanto, we will be breaking the law for saving any seeds.

Quoting michiganmom116:

You know, he did it KNOWING that what he was doing wasn't right. He KNOWS by signing the agreement that he's not to use those beans for seed....and he KNEW those beans that he bought were the kind that were not supposed to be used for seed because they were beans from Monsanto seeds. Logistically, I can see where Monsanto is right, no matter how much I hate them.

Wanna save seeds for the next crop? Take the time to find heirloom varieties.

Monsanto already owns several heirloom companies. I just make sure to buy my seeds from the little guys that aren't Monsanto-owned.

Quoting NWP:

Patent law is messed up.

Did
you know you could patent a rectangle with rounded corners? And that
Apple and Sony are currently suing each other in two different countries
over infringing on this patent?

I understand what you are saying about this case, but the ability to patent DNA has a lot more unintended(?) consequences than just these GMO seeds...especially for stem cell research, organ transplants and possibly even fertility treatments.

And as far as heirlooms go, Monsanto is applying for patents on these too. You can basically apply for and own a patent on about anything...Pretty soon, if the courts continue to rule for Monsanto, we will be breaking the law for saving any seeds.

Quoting michiganmom116:

You know, he did it KNOWING that what he was doing wasn't right. He KNOWS by signing the agreement that he's not to use those beans for seed....and he KNEW those beans that he bought were the kind that were not supposed to be used for seed because they were beans from Monsanto seeds. Logistically, I can see where Monsanto is right, no matter how much I hate them.

Wanna save seeds for the next crop? Take the time to find heirloom varieties.

Send me email updates about messages I've received on the site and the latest news from The CafeMom Team.
By signing up, you certify that you are female and accept the Terms of Service and have read the
Privacy Policy.