Members of Chevedden group shift focus to environmental, social and political proposals

Companies that have long battled the prolific John Chevedden group on corporate governance shareholder proposals, as first noted on theCorporateCounsel.net proxy season blog, may be heartened to hear — or maybe not—that some members of the group are changing their focus.

Companies that have long battled the prolific John Chevedden group on corporate governance shareholder proposals, as first noted on theCorporateCounsel.net proxy season blog, may be heartened to hear — or maybe not—that some members of the group are changing their focus.

As group member James McRitchie reports, to date, the group has focused entirely on corporate governance issues because of the group’s belief that companies that were more “democratic” would be more “likely to listen to their shareholders on other issues as well. Democracies facilitate voice and the exchange of ideas. Fighting for environmental and social issues, while extremely important, felt like addressing symptoms, rather than root causes.” To the extent that some of the group’s governance-related proposals were ultimately not submitted—for example, because they were excluded under the Rule 14a-8(i)(9) exclusion for conflicting proposals using the approach of “ratification” of existing provisions (see this PubCo post and this PubCo post), an approach that McRitchie views as “underhanded”—McRitchie indicates that the group may resubmit those proposals for another go-around. McRitchie also celebrates the recently announced position of Glass Lewis to vote against board members where companies have taken the ratification approach and, presumably, he is similarly elated by ISS’s comparable position. (See this PubCo post and this PubCo post.)

However, McRitchie announces, he and his wife, Myra Young, will now turn their attention to collaborations with the organizations As You Sow and the Center for Political Accountability as proponents for shareholder proposals on environmental, social and political spending issues. He advises that John Chevedden and Kenneth Steiner are also expected to “broaden their focus” this proxy season, but will still continue to pursue their corporate governance objectives, so don’t expect those corporate governance proposals to disappear altogether.

This blog is provided for general informational purposes only and no attorney-client relationship with the law firm Cooley LLP and Cooley (UK) LLP is created with you when you use the blog. By using the blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice. Do not send any confidential information through the blog or by email to Cooley LLP and Cooley (UK) LLP, neither of whom will have any duty to keep it confidential. The blog is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your state. The information on the blog may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date, and may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on the blog are the opinions of the authors only and not those of Cooley LLP and Cooley (UK) LLP.