How we can overthrow the Jew World Order

This is my legacy to the dissident community. I am being prevented both from sending and receiving emails and even from accessing my site.From a Jewish point of view, this is impeccable timing. I call it a Jewincidence, that is a “coincidence” that is “good for the Jews”.

It all happened right at the time when I was about to properly launch my “money weaponising” project. The Jews must be really scared.

Shortly after blogging about my project, little over a week ago, my visitor numbers dropped dramatically, no more 6,000 to 20,000 users and 150,000 to 220,000 page views per day. The site has been virtually dead ever since.

To make matters worse, yesterday, the day I was locked out of my own site, was also the day when the hosting fee and related expenses became due. It is only a matter of time, maybe hours, a couple of days at the most, until my site will be suspended and be gone forever. Maybe it’s a good idea to print out a copy of this article.

I have a dream

I have a dream of Heaven on Earth. A world where there is no such thing as hunger or poverty, no war or revolution, in fact no violence at all. In that vision of mine there is no place for any evils like drug abuse, sex slavery, paedophilia, perverted art, exploitation and abuse of any kind. People don’t have to spend 95% of their life’s income to pay for interest and taxes, because they are both abolished, nor do they have to pay for energy — because it’s free.

We will no longer be turned into zombies and made infertile with poisoned vaccines, air, water, food and pharmaceuticals.

Women will be able to stay at home to look after their children, if they want to, because their husbands will make enough money to take care of all the bills, and nobody will dare to belittle women because they follow their instincts and their heart.

Homosexuality will no longer be tolerated. While people will be free to live out their perversions in the privacy of their homes, provided they don’t harm anyone but themselves, our children will certainly no longer be made believe that it’s normal for a man to stick his penis into another men’s arse.

Race mixing will neither be forbidden nor encouraged. The beauty of diversity lies in the differences. If you don’t agree go to a smorgasbord, load your plate with all your favourite foods and ask the kitchen to blend it together for you. Bon appétit.

Products will be manufactured wherever the clients are. No more moving production to slave labour countries, only so that the banksters make a few more bucks.

The key to Heaven on Earth is a World without Jews

The big hurdle for the fulfilment of this dream are the Jews. Not only have they turned us in their virtual slaves by making us work 95% of our life to pay for Jewish bank interest, Jewish puppet government taxes and for Jewish corporation supplied energy. They control what we know, believe and think and have turned our parliaments into whorehouses and the legal fraternity into pimps.

If we want to derail the Jew World Order, we must attack them on all four fronts. It’s asymmetrical warfare, so we need to be smart.

Jiu-Jitsu shows us how to defeat a bigger and stronger opponent. The trick is to use the strength of the enemy and turn it against him. The biggest strength of the Jew is his money. As long as he sucks out 95% of our life earnings, through interest, energy and tax, he can buy all the governments and armies, media, schools and universities of the world, plus politicians and judges too.

How to defeat the Jews

The only way to defeat the Jews is by beating them at their own game. We can educate people as much as we want and maybe elect governments sympathetic to how we feel. And yet, it won’t make any difference, because they can’t do Jack shit.

As long as the Jews control the money, they can finance anything that’s just “good for the Jews”. We need to weaponise money just like they do and finance things that are “good for us” too, in other words “bad for the Jews”.

I can think of thousands of projects, such as developing cheap solar power solutions that help people get off the grid. Imagine how much money would remain in your pocket, if you no longer had to pay for petrol, gas and electricity.

We can finance effective media employing investigative journalists, to help make people more Jew aware. We can buy politicians and academics, radio and TV stations, develop perma-culture education centres and distributions networks teaching people how to grow healthy food and sell their surplus.

We can finance research to develop the Tesla free-energy machine, cars that only run on free electricity and cancer treatments that will actually work. We can provide activists with an online payment solution that won’t be cancelled at a whim of the Jews. And we can set up book chains that sell books without giving a damn whether the Jews like them or not.

The list is endless; I could go on all day. However I’m sure you are already getting the drift.

Once we seize control of their money weapon, they are defenceless like a tank or a battle ship that’s run out of fuel.

How to create a Jew-free bank

It’s not all that difficult. All we need is set up national banks. Different countries have different rules how much money we need to come up with. In most countries it’s around 100 to 200 Million Dollars, in some more and in some less.

We just need to put together a network of activists who chat up people on the street. We will sell shares that will pay out dividends like any other bank. In fact there will be hardly any difference, except that the Jews will be cut out of the deal. Even more important will be a policy that we will not finance projects that are only “good for the Jews”.

The reason for making it a share-based company is not just that it is an easy way to raise funds. More important even is that share ownership is anonymous, that’s why they are called “société anonyme” in French. The holders don’t need to worry about retaliation by the Jews.

We are going to make it a brick-and-mortar kind of a setup with retail outlets, similar to most banks. We will employ people and pay them salaries, and will consult to our corporate customers how to run their “bad for the Jews” businesses profitably and not go broke in the first couple of years.

Of course we are not going to trade our shares on the Jew-controlled stock market. That would be stupid because they could screw us in hundreds, if not thousands, of different ways. But who said that company shares need to be traded on a stock exchange? They don’t. We can sell them on a table in a stall on a community market or on a card table on the sidewalk.

The Jews can’t do anything about it

Best of it all is that the Jews can’t do anything about it. The rules they have written to make it easy for them to screw us, can be just as well used by us against them. Eat that, Abe!

The more they torment us, the easier it will become to sell enough Jew-free bank shares. We have the numbers on our side. All we have to do is what the buffalos did in the video below, join forces against the predating lions – and trample them to death.

I don’t care what you call it – personally I like “Rebel Bank” – but that’s just me. The only thing that really matters is that our Jew-free banks use all of their money to only finance projects that are “bad for the Jews”.

All the Jew-free banks all over the world will work together to cut out the Jews in international money transfers too. That would be a huge coup. Winston Churchill admitted once that the only reason why he forced Hitler into war was because his Jewish overlords were upset that he cut out the “City” with his baarter deals with Mexico and Rumania (German machines for oil and grain).

That’s how we will do it

We are going to raise the startup capital solely with funds raised by volunteers. Once the bank is up and running we will issue non-voting shares to be able to finance as many “good for the 99%” projects as possible.

Each volunteer only needs to fulfill four simple tasks within 2 weeks:

endorse and promote the “Rebel Bank” project in their community

register as a user on therebel.is and join the “Rebel Bank” closed “Rebel Community” group

raise a minimum of $100 and send them to my rebelofoz@hushmail.com PayPal account, specifying “Rebel Bank” as the purpose

recruit a minimum of 3 new volunteers who do the same

Each “Rebel Bank” community group member will be issued his own secure/encrypted email account so that we can still communicate if this site has been taken down.

In case PayPal cancels my account with them, which they probably will, look here for new instructions, I already have alternatives in place.

The 2 weeks time limit is critical, to ensure we can have the bank up within 6 months.

Conclusion

As you can see this plan is brilliant – and best of all, it will work. The Jews do realise that, and are panicking. That’s exactly the reason why they are making it difficult for me to access my site and send or receive emails. They know that if I can make this happen it’s the biggest threat to the Jew Word Order in the past 70 years.

I don’t care if they arrest or kill me, or just make it impossible for me to run the Rebel Site. It would only prove that my plan will work. Just remember, nobody is irreplaceable. Anybody can use my plan and implement it because I am deliberately describing it in so much detail. The more rebel banks and countries, the better. Remember the buffalo stomping the lions. If we want to survive we must create a world without Jews.

To discuss the “Rebel Bank” project and to find out how to help, please click here…

In 1864, Confederate General Patrick Cleburne warned his fellow southerners of the historical consequences should the South lose their war for independence. He was truly a prophet. He said if the South lost, “It means that the history of this heroic struggle will be written by the enemy. That our youth will be trained by Northern school teachers; will learn from Northern school books their version of the war; will be impressed by all of the influences of History and Education to regard our gallant dead as traitors and our maimed veterans as fit subjects for derision.” No truer words were ever spoken.

History revisionists flooded America’s public schools with Northern propaganda about the people who attempted to secede from the United States, characterizing them as racists, extremists, radicals, hatemongers, traitors, etc. You know, the same way that people in our federal government and news media attempt to characterize Christians, patriots, war veterans, constitutionalists, et al. today.

Folks, please understand that the only people in 1861 who believed that states did NOT have the right to secede were Abraham Lincoln and his radical Republicans. To say that southern states did not have the right to secede from the United States is to say that the thirteen colonies did not have the right to secede from Great Britain. One cannot be right and the other wrong. If one is right, both are right. How can we celebrate our Declaration of Independence in 1776 and then turn around and condemn the Declaration of Independence of the Confederacy in 1861? Talk about hypocrisy!

In fact, southern states were not the only states that talked about secession. After the southern states seceded, the State of Maryland fully intended to join them. In September of 1861, Lincoln sent federal troops to the State capital and seized the legislature by force in order to prevent them from voting. Federal provost marshals stood guard at the polls and arrested Democrats and anyone else who believed in secession. A special furlough was granted to Maryland troops so they could go home and vote against secession. Judges who tried to inquire into the phony elections were arrested and thrown into military prisons. There is your great “emancipator,” folks.

And before the South seceded, several northern states had also threatened secession. Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode Island had threatened secession as far back as James Madison’s administration. In addition, the states of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware were threatening secession during the first half of the nineteenth century–long before the southern states even considered such a thing.

People say constantly that Lincoln “saved” the Union. Lincoln didn’t save the Union; he subjugated the Union. There is a huge difference. A union that is not voluntary is not a union. Does a man have a right to force a woman to marry him or to force a woman to stay married to him? In the eyes of God, a union of husband and wife is far superior to a union of states. If God recognizes the right of husbands and wives to separate (and He does), to try and suggest that states do not have the right to lawfully (under Natural and divine right) separate is the most preposterous proposition imaginable.

People say that Lincoln freed the slaves. Lincoln did NOT free a single slave. But what he did do was enslave free men. His so-called Emancipation Proclamation had NO AUTHORITY in the southern states, as they had separated into another country. Imagine a President today signing a proclamation to free folks in, say, China or Saudi Arabia. He would be laughed out of Washington. Lincoln had no authority over the Confederate States of America, and he knew it.

Do you not find it interesting that Lincoln’s proclamation did NOT free a single slave in the United States, the country in which he DID have authority? That’s right. The Emancipation Proclamation deliberately ignored slavery in the North. Do you not realize that when Lincoln signed his proclamation, there were over 300,000 slaveholders who were fighting in the Union army? Check it out.

One of those northern slaveholders was General (and later U.S. President) Ulysses S. Grant. In fact, he maintained possession of his slaves even after the War Between the States concluded. Recall that his counterpart, Confederate General Robert E. Lee, freed his slaves BEFORE hostilities between North and South ever broke out. When asked why he refused to free his slaves, Grant said, “Good help is hard to find these days.”

The institution of slavery did not end until the 13th Amendment was ratified on December 6, 1865.

Speaking of the 13th Amendment, did you know that Lincoln authored his own 13th Amendment? It is the only amendment to the Constitution ever proposed by a sitting U.S. President. Here is Lincoln’s proposed amendment: “No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give Congress the power to abolish or interfere within any state with the domestic institutions thereof, including that a person’s held to labor or service by laws of said State.”

You read it right. Lincoln proposed an amendment to the U.S. Constitution PRESERVING the institution of slavery. This proposed amendment was written in March of 1861, a month BEFORE the shots were fired at Fort Sumter, South Carolina.

The State of South Carolina was particularly incensed at the tariffs enacted in 1828 and 1832. The Tariff of 1828 was disdainfully called, “The Tariff of Abominations” by the State of South Carolina. Accordingly, the South Carolina legislature declared that the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 were “unauthorized by the constitution of the United States.”

Think, folks: why would the southern states secede from the Union over slavery when President Abraham Lincoln had offered an amendment to the Constitution guaranteeing the PRESERVATION of slavery? That makes no sense. If the issue was predominantly slavery, all the South needed to do was to go along with Lincoln, and his proposed 13th Amendment would have permanently preserved slavery among the southern (and northern) states. Does that sound like a body of people who were willing to lose hundreds of thousands of men on the battlefield over saving slavery? What nonsense!

The problem was Lincoln wanted the southern states to pay the Union a 40% tariff on their exports. The South considered this outrageous and refused to pay. By the time hostilities broke out in 1861, the South was paying up to, and perhaps exceeding, 70% of the nation’s taxes. Before the war, the South was very prosperous and productive. And Washington, D.C., kept raising the taxes and tariffs on them. You know, the way Washington, D.C., keeps raising the taxes on prosperous American citizens today.

This is much the same story of the way the colonies refused to pay the demanded tariffs of the British Crown–albeit the tariffs of the Crown were MUCH lower than those demanded by Lincoln. Lincoln’s proposed 13th Amendment was an attempt to entice the South into paying the tariffs by being willing to permanently ensconce the institution of slavery into the Constitution. AND THE SOUTH SAID NO!

In addition, the Congressional Record of the United States forever obliterates the notion that the North fought the War Between the States over slavery. Read it for yourself. This resolution was passed unanimously in the U.S. Congress on July 23, 1861, “The War is waged by the government of the United States not in the spirit of conquest or subjugation, nor for the purpose of overthrowing or interfering with the rights or institutions of the states, but to defend and protect the Union.”

What could be clearer? The U.S. Congress declared that the war against the South was NOT an attempt to overthrow or interfere with the “institutions” of the states, but to keep the Union intact (by force). The “institutions” implied most certainly included the institution of slavery.

Hear it loudly and clearly: Lincoln’s war against the South had NOTHING to do with ending slavery–so said the U.S. Congress by unanimous resolution in 1861.

Abraham Lincoln, himself, said it was NEVER his intention to end the institution of slavery. In a letter to Alexander Stevens who later became the Vice President of the Confederacy, Lincoln wrote this, “Do the people of the South really entertain fears that a Republican administration would directly, or indirectly, interfere with their slaves, or with them, about their slaves? If they do, I wish to assure you, as once a friend, and still, I hope, not an enemy, that there is no cause for such fears. The South would be in no more danger in this respect than it was in the days of Washington.”

Again, what could be clearer? Lincoln, himself, said the southern states had nothing to fear from him in regard to abolishing slavery.

Hear Lincoln again: “If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it.” He also said, “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so and I have no inclination to do so.”

The idea that the Confederate flag (actually there were five of them) stood for racism, bigotry, hatred, and slavery is just so much hogwash. In fact, if one truly wants to discover who the racist was in 1861, just read the words of Mr. Lincoln.

On August 14, 1862, Abraham Lincoln invited a group of black people to the White House. In his address to them, he told them of his plans to colonize them all back to Africa. Listen to what he told these folks: “Why should the people of your race be colonized and where? Why should they leave this country? This is, perhaps, the first question for proper consideration. You and we are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races. Whether it is right or wrong I need not discuss; but this physical difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think. Your race suffers very greatly, many of them, by living among us, while ours suffers from your presence. In a word, we suffer on each side. If this is admitted, it affords a reason, at least, why we should be separated. You here are freemen, I suppose? Perhaps you have been long free, or all your lives. Your race is suffering, in my judgment, the greatest wrong inflicted on any people. But even when you cease to be slaves, you are yet far removed from being placed on an equality with the white race. The aspiration of men is to enjoy equality with the best when free, but on this broad continent not a single man of your race is made the equal of a single man of our race.”

Did you hear what Lincoln said? He said that black people would NEVER be equal with white people–even if they all obtained their freedom from slavery. If that isn’t a racist statement, I’ve never heard one.

Lincoln’s statement above is not isolated. In Charleston, Illinois, in 1858, Lincoln said in a speech, “I am not, nor have ever been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races. I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races from living together on social or political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white.”

Ladies and gentlemen, in his own words, Abraham Lincoln declared himself to be a white supremacist. Why don’t our history books and news media tell the American people the truth about Lincoln and about the War Between the States?

It’s simple: if people would study the meanings and history of the flag, symbols, and statues of the Confederacy and Confederate leaders, they might begin to awaken to the tyrannical policies of Washington, D.C., that precluded southern independence–policies that have only escalated since the defeat of the Confederacy–and they might have a notion to again resist.

By the time Lincoln penned his Emancipation Proclamation, the war had been going on for two years without resolution. In fact, the North was losing the war. Even though the South was outmanned and out-equipped, the genius of the southern generals and fighting acumen of the southern men had put the northern armies on their heels. Many people in the North never saw the legitimacy of Lincoln’s war in the first place, and many of them actively campaigned against it. These people were affectionately called “Copperheads” by people in the South.

I urge you to watch Ron Maxwell’s accurate depiction of those people in the North who favored the southern cause as depicted in his motion picture, “Copperhead.” For that matter, I consider his movie, “Gods And Generals” to be the greatest “Civil War” movie ever made. It is the most accurate and fairest depiction of Confederate General Thomas Jonathan “Stonewall” Jackson ever produced. In my opinion, actor Stephen Lang should have received an Oscar for his performance as General Jackson. But, can you imagine?

That’s another thing: the war fought from 1861 to 1865 was NOT a “civil war.” Civil war suggests two sides fighting for control of the same capital and country. The South didn’t want to take over Washington, D.C., no more than their forebears wanted to take over London. They wanted to separate from Washington, D.C., just as America’s Founding Fathers wanted to separate from Great Britain. The proper names for that war are either, “The War Between the States” or, “The War of Southern Independence,” or, more fittingly, “The War of Northern Aggression.”

Had the South wanted to take over Washington, D.C., they could have done so with the very first battle of the “Civil War.” When Lincoln ordered federal troops to invade Virginia in the First Battle of Manassas (called the “First Battle of Bull Run” by the North), Confederate troops sent the Yankees running for their lives all the way back to Washington. Had the Confederates pursued them, they could have easily taken the city of Washington, D.C., seized Abraham Lincoln, and perhaps ended the war before it really began. But General Beauregard and the others had no intention of fighting an aggressive war against the North. They merely wanted to defend the South against the aggression of the North.

In order to rally people in the North, Lincoln needed a moral crusade. That’s what his Emancipation Proclamation was all about. This explains why his proclamation was not penned until 1863, after two years of fruitless fighting. He was counting on people in the North to stop resisting his war against the South if they thought it was some kind of “holy” war. Plus, Lincoln was hoping that his proclamation would incite blacks in the South to insurrect against southern whites. If thousands of blacks would begin to wage war against their white neighbors, the fighting men of the southern armies would have to leave the battlefields and go home to defend their families. THIS NEVER HAPPENED.

Not only did blacks not riot against the whites of the south, many black men volunteered to fight alongside their white friends and neighbors in the Confederate army. Unlike the blacks in the North, who were conscripted by Lincoln and forced to fight in segregated units, thousands of blacks in the South fought of their own free will in a fully-integrated southern army. I bet your history book never told you about that.

If one wants to ban a racist flag, one would have to ban the British flag. Ships bearing the Union Jack shipped over 5 million African slaves to countries all over the world, including the British colonies in North America. Other slave ships flew the Dutch flag and the Portuguese flag and the Spanish flag, and, yes, the U.S. flag. But not one single slave ship flew the Confederate flag. NOT ONE!

By the time Lincoln launched his war against the southern states, slavery was already a dying institution. The entire country, including the South, recognized the moral evil of slavery and wanted it to end. Only a small fraction of southerners even owned slaves. The slave trade had ended in 1808, per the U.S. Constitution, and the practice of slavery was quickly dying, too. In another few years, with the advent of agricultural machinery, slavery would have ended peacefully–just like it had in England. It didn’t take a national war and the deaths of over a half million men to end slavery in Great Britain. America’s so-called “Civil War” was absolutely unnecessary. The greed of Lincoln’s radical Republicans in the North, combined with the cold, calloused heart of Lincoln himself is responsible for the tragedy of the “Civil War.”

And look at what is happening now: in one instant–after one deranged young man killed nine black people and who ostensibly photo-shopped a picture of himself with a Confederate flag–the entire political and media establishments in the country go on an all-out crusade to remove all semblances of the Confederacy. The speed in which all of this has happened suggests that this was a planned, orchestrated event by the Powers That Be (PTB). And is it a mere coincidence that this took place at the exact same time that the U.S. Supreme Court decided to legalize same-sex marriage? I think not.

The Confederate Battle Flag flies the Saint Andrews cross. Of course, Andrew was the first disciple of Jesus Christ, brother of Simon Peter, and Christian martyr who was crucified on an X-shaped cross at around the age of 90. Andrew is the patron saint of both Russia and Scotland.

In the 1800s, up to 75% of people in the South were either Scotch or Scotch-Irish. The Confederate Battle Flag is predicated on the national flag of Scotland. It is a symbol of the Christian faith and heritage of the Celtic race.

Pastor John Weaver rightly observed, “Even the Confederate States motto, ‘Deovendickia,’ (The Lord is our Vindicator), illustrates the sovereignty and the righteousness of God. The Saint Andrews cross is also known as the Greek letter CHIA (KEE) and has historically been used to represent Jesus Christ. Why do you think people write Merry X-mas, just to give you an illustration? The ‘X’ is the Greek letter CHIA and it has been historically used for Christ. Moreover, its importance was understood by educated and uneducated people alike. When an uneducated man, one that could not write, needed to sign his name please tell me what letter he made? An ‘X,’ why? Because he was saying I am taking an oath under God. I am recognizing the sovereignty of God, the providence of God and I am pledging my faith. May I tell you the Confederate Flag is indeed a Christian flag because it has the cross of Saint Andrew, who was a Christian martyr, and the letter ‘X’ has always been used to represent Christ, and to attack the flag is to deny the sovereignty, the majesty, and the might of the Lord Jesus Christ and his divine role in our history, culture, and life.”

Many of the facts that I reference in this column were included in a message delivered several years ago by Pastor John Weaver. I want to thank John for preaching such a powerful and needed message. Read or watch Pastor Weaver’s sermon “The Truth About The Confederate Battle Flag” here:

The Truth About The Confederate Battle Flag

Combine the current attacks against Biblical and traditional marriage, the attacks against all things Confederate, the attacks against all things Christian, and the attacks against all things constitutional and what we are witnessing is a heightened example of why the Confederate Battle Flag was created to begin with. Virtually every act of federal usurpation of liberty that we are witnessing today, and have been witnessing for much of the twentieth century, is the result of Lincoln’s war against the South. Truly, we are living in Lincoln’s America, not Washington and Jefferson’s America. Washington and Jefferson’s America died at Appomattox Court House in 1865.

​​On December 17, 1862, General Ulysses S. Grant issued General Order No. 11, which banished all Jews from Tennessee’s western military.

General Orders No. 11 declared:

1. The Jews, as a class, violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department, are hereby expelled from the Department.

2. Within 24 hours from the receipt of this order by Post Commanders, they will see that all of this class of people are furnished with passes required to leave, and anyone returning after such notification, will be arrested and held in confinement until an opportunity occurs of sending them out as prisoners, unless furnished with permits from these headquarters.

3. No permits will be given these people to visit headquarters for the purpose of making personal application for trade permits.

Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.