CarlG wrote:
Absolutely a great shot!! Only nit (a small one, albeit) is the small void in the upper left corner. I would clone one of the neighboring petals to fill it in. My eye is drawn to that void and don't want it to be.

Thanks, Carl. Fixed the nit.

Tony

ImagemasterRegistered: Feb 23, 2004Total Posts: 40610Country: Canada

DLP wrote:
Shazam! Great shot Tony but where's the bird?

Dave

Thanks, Dave. The bird flew the coop. :

Tony

CarlGRegistered: Mar 12, 2002Total Posts: 6505Country: United States

Imagemaster wrote:CarlG wrote:
Absolutely a great shot!! Only nit (a small one, albeit) is the small void in the upper left corner. I would clone one of the neighboring petals to fill it in. My eye is drawn to that void and don't want it to be.

Did you use Topaz simplify plugins? The image looks little cartoon-y, which is sometimes desirable and the plugins are for. It'll clean the image but it may look too fake. You did a good job but I can see it has been processed this way.... maybe that's why it looks good

ImagemasterRegistered: Feb 23, 2004Total Posts: 40610Country: Canada

Gregg B. wrote:
Did you use Topaz simplify plugins? The image looks little cartoon-y, which is sometimes desirable and the plugins are for. It'll clean the image but it may look too fake. You did a good job but I can see it has been processed this way.... maybe that's why it looks good

Thanks, I can't remember if I used Topaz filters or just Photoshop ones. Of course it has a processed-look, that is why it is posted on the Digital Art & Abstract Forum. If it was just normal post-processing, it would be posted on the Nature & Wildlife Forum.

Tony

birdiedRegistered: May 02, 2010Total Posts: 32971Country: United States