Monthly Archives: April 2017

Post navigation

To provide a baseline for comparison, another third of the trials involved jump events of type E. Stimulus-aligned EEG averages indicated that class D-jump events triggered a phasic negativity in the EEG (p < 0.01 at Cz; Figure 3, left), relative to the E-jump control condition. (Like the ERP obtained in this study, the FRN sometimes takes the form of a relative negativity occupying the positive voltage domain, rather than absolute negativity. For germane examples, see Nieuwenhuis et al., 2005 and Yeung et al., 2005.) Like the FRN, this negativity was largest in the fronto-central midline leads (including Cz, see

Figure 3, right), and although the observed negativity peaked later than the typical FRN, its timing is consistent Selleck PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor 2 with studies of equivalent complexity of feedback (Baker and Holroyd,

2011). In our first fMRI experiment, a group of 30 new participants performed a slightly different version of the delivery task, again designed to elicit negative PPEs. As in the EEG experiment, one-third of trials included a jump of type D (as in Figure 2), and another third included a jump of type E. Type D jumps, by increasing the distance to the subgoal, were again intended to trigger a PPE. However, in the fMRI version of the task, unlike the EEG version, the exact increase in subgoal distance varied across trials. Therefore, type D jumps were intended to induce PPEs that varied in magnitude (Figure 2). Linifanib (ABT-869) Our analyses took a model-based approach (O’Doherty DAPT et al., 2007), testing for regions that showed phasic activation correlating positively with predicted PPE size. A whole-brain general linear model analysis, thresholded at p < 0.01 (cluster-size thresholded to correct for multiple comparisons),

revealed such a correlation in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC; Figure 4). This region has been proposed to contain the generator of the FRN (Holroyd and Coles, 2002, although see Nieuwenhuis et al., 2005 and Discussion below). In this regard the fMRI result is consistent with the result of our EEG experiment. The same parametric fMRI effect was also observed bilaterally in the anterior insula, a region often coactivated with the ACC in the setting of unanticipated negative events (Phan et al., 2004). The effect was also detected in right supramarginal gyrus, the medial part of lingual gyrus, and, with a negative coefficient, in the left inferior frontal gyrus. However, in a follow-up analysis we controlled for subgoal displacement (e.g., the distance between the original package location and point D in Figure 2), a nuisance variable moderately correlated, across trials, with the change in distance to subgoal. Within this analysis only the ACC (p < 0.01), bilateral anterior insula (p < 0.01 left, p

Although the reported effects of attention and rivalry have been variable when Galunisertib price measure physiologically in V1 (e.g., Tong et al., 2006; Reynolds and Chelazzi, 2004), this could be due to a variety of factors including variability in the properties of the stimuli used, such as stimulus contrast and size, which under the normalization framework, predict variable levels of modulation. Ultimately, however,

psychophysical methods can only go so far in pinpointing the neural locus of such effects, and further work in neuroimaging and electrophysiology may shed further light on where in the visual processing hierarchy attention modulates the neural events BMS-354825 in vitro underlying visual competition. In summary, our results support a normalization model for visual competition, in which attention plays a crucial role in regulating the neural contrast

response. Attention has long been known to affect rivalry, with some studies reporting that attention modulates the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry (Paffen and Alais, 2011; Mitchell et al., 2004), and others reporting that rivalry does not occur in the absence of attention in certain early visuocortical areas (Lee et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2011; Watanabe et al., 2011). While these studies suggest that attention can modulate rivalry, our results and model reveal that these two processes are even more intricately intertwined: visual awareness during dominance

phases of rivalry dictates what receives attention and what does not, which in turn interacts with normalization to determine the gain of the neural response. Four observers participated in the study. All below had normal or corrected-to-normal vision and gave written consent in compliance with the protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board at Vanderbilt University. Stimuli were generated on a Macintosh running Matlab and the Psychophysics Toolbox (Brainard, 1997; Pelli, 1997). Observers viewed the display in a darkened room on a gamma-corrected CRT (21” Sony MultiScan; refresh rate: 100 Hz). Observers’ heads were stabilized with a chin and forehead rest, 96 cm from the display. The display was viewed through a mirror stereoscope that presented the left half of the display exclusively to the left eye and the right half of the display exclusively to the right eye. Throughout the experiment, each eye viewed a fixation point (0.14° × 0.14°), along with circular fusion frames (9° × 9°) to help stabilized binocular eye alignment (Figure 1). In each trial, stimuli were presented dichoptically, with both eyes viewing orthogonally oriented filtered noise patches.

These results demonstrate that the activation of the CAMKK2-AMPK kinase pathway is required to mediate the synaptotoxic effects observed in MLN0128 price the APPSWE,IND mouse model in vivo. Plaques of Aβ and tangles formed by hyperphosphorylated forms of the microtubule-binding protein Tau

are the two histopathological signatures found in the brains of patients with AD. Although both Aβ and Tau have been extensively studied independently with regard to their separate modes of toxicity, recent results have shed light on their possible interactions and synergistic effects during AD progression. For example, Tau-deficient mice are less susceptible to Aβ toxicity than control mice (Roberson et al., 2007). Recent results have shown that AMPK is a potent Tau kinase (Thornton et al., 2011). In order to reconstitute a biochemical pathway triggering AMPK activation, we expressed a GFP-tagged version of Tau and AMPKα in HeLa cells, which are naturally deficient for LKB1 (Hawley et al., 2003). In this model, AMPK can be specifically activated by reintroducing its upstream activator LKB1. This experiment confirmed that AMPK phosphorylates the well-characterized KxGS motif on Tau Serine 262 (S262) residue (Figure 5A). When coexpressed in cell lines, both LKB1 (coexpressed

with its coactivator STRAD) and CAMKK2 are potent activators of AMPK, although we observed that CAMKK2 was significantly more potent in phosphorylating Selleckchem ABT 888 AMPK on T172 than LKB1 or CAMKK1 (Figure 5B). Furthermore, direct activation of AMPK using the AMP analog AICAR triggered a dose-dependent increase of Tau phosphorylation of S262 in cortical neurons (Figures 5C, 5D, and S4), a treatment that induces a dose-dependent reduction in spine density (Figures 1N and 1O). The microtubule-associated protein Tau is phosphorylated in multiple sites (Mandelkow and Mandelkow, 2012), and analysis of six well-characterized Phosphoprotein phosphatase phosphorylation sites revealed that following 24 hr treatment with AICAR, phosphorylation of Tau on S262 is significantly increased in a dose-dependent manner but that

other sites are either unchanged (for example, the other KxGS motif on S356, as well as S396, S422) or decreased (S202/T205, S404) (Figures S4A and S4B). This observation suggests that S262 is an important target of AMPK, and phosphorylation of this site might underlie AMPK-induced spine loss. Previous studies in Drosophila suggested that overexpression of AMPK-related member PAR-1/MARK2 induced neurotoxicity through phosphorylation of Tau in the microtubule-binding domains on S262 and S356 and that phosphorylation of these sites played an initiator role in the pathogenic phosphorylation process of Tau ( Nishimura et al., 2004). Given the importance of phosphorylation of S262 as a “priming” site ( Biernat et al.

, 2009). Subjects were presented with neutral faces in emotional or neutral PD0325901 contexts. Their emotional response during the encoding phase was measured by pupil size. Activation of the LC region, as measured by fMRI, was observed during retrieval if, and only if, there had been an emotional response, as indexed by pupil dilation, during the encoding phase. Retention performance was related to the degree of pupil dilation during encoding and LC activation during retrieval (Sterpenich et al.,

2006). It is not unreasonable to look upon the LC activation during retrieval as a conditioned response to the learning context, part of the TRC, as suggested by the data from the rat experiments discussed above. Noradrenaline released in the forebrain would have effects in several brain regions GSK1210151A cell line that are involved in memory retrieval, including thalamic and cortical regions processing sensory information. Most importantly, it could activate or modulate frontohippocampal networks that are essential for memory retrieval and serve as a reset signal in the ventral parietal network and/or frontal cortex to change the focus of attention

(Corbetta and Shulman, 2002; Bouret and Sara, 2005; Corbetta et al., 2008). The relatively sparse literature delineating the behavioral contexts driving LC and parallel autonomic responses is complemented by a wealth of experiments showing the essential role played by the LC input to frontal cortex in regulating

Rutecarpine complex cognitive processes. In an early study, idazoxan, an alpha 2 receptor antagonist that increases firing rate of LC neurons and promotes release of noradrenaline, enhanced the ability of rats to switch between a response strategy and a visual strategy in a complex maze task. There was no effect of the drug on the initial acquisition of the task in either modality; the facilitation was seen only when the rat was required to shift attention from one modality to the other and modify the behavioral strategy (Devauges and Sara, 1991). More recently, Brown and colleagues developed a complex extradimensional shift (EDS) task in which rats had to identify which of the multiple dimensions of a compound stimulus was associated with reward and shift between attentional sets every time the contingency between the stimulus dimension and the reward was changed (Birrell and Brown, 2000). Using this new protocol, several groups have extended the early work on LC/NA involvement on cognitive flexibility, showing that attentional set shifting clearly requires the noradrenergic system, via action in the medial prefrontal cortex (Lapiz and Morilak, 2006; Tait et al., 2007; McGaughy et al., 2008). A particularly convincing recent report from the Valentino laboratory links mild stress acting specifically through the LC with facilitation of attentional set shifting (Snyder et al., 2012).

, 2012 and Trachtenberg et al., 2000). The resistance NVP-BKM120 of L4 to manipulations of the periphery is widely believed to result from developmental downregulation of long-term potentiation and depression at the TC synapse, as observed in vitro (Feldman et al., 1999). Some in vivo studies have, however, reported short-latency (<10 ms) changes in L4 responses and have suggested that TC plasticity might still exist beyond adolescence (Wallace and Fox, 1999). We revisited this issue by performing simultaneous cell-attached recordings from two L4 neurons in the same barrel (Figure 4A, left). Population peristimulus time histograms of L4 responses to sensory stimulation appeared similar for control and deprived

groups (Figure 4A, middle), and their temporal profiles were also similar (Figure S2A). The deprived group had a slightly increased response (Figure 4A, right) as in previous studies (Glazewski and Fox, 1996), but this 14% increase in average evoked activity was not statistically significant (p = 0.36, 36 control and 43 deprived cells). Similarly, deprivation did not significantly affect spontaneous firing rates. We and others have suggested, however,

that sensory information may be more robustly propagated by near-synchronous discharges of presynaptic pools of neurons rather than by uncoordinated increases in firing rates (Bruno, 2011 and Bruno EX-527 and Sakmann, 2006). To assess synchrony, we initially plotted cross-correlation histograms for simultaneously recorded pairs of L4 neurons (Figure 4B; Figures S2B and S2C). Firing-rate-normalized cross-correlation histograms (Eggermont and Smith, 1996) for each group suggest that neurons in deprived animals are more likely to discharge

action potentials within ∼10 ms of one another (Figure 4C; Figure S2D). However, statistical comparison of time-based “cross-correlograms” is notoriously problematic. A more rigorous way to quantify and statistically test correlated activity is to compute coherence, which re-represents spike trains in the frequency domain, where any two frequencies are statistically independent (Jarvis and Mitra, 2001). By definition, coherence ranges from 0.0 (no correlation) to 1.0 (identical trains of action potentials) Org 27569 and is intrinsically normalized by the firing rates of the two cells. The average coherence of the responses of simultaneously recorded neurons was increased by whisker trimming for all frequency components of the neural activity (Figure 4D). We calculated a single coherence value for each pair by averaging its coherence function over 4–20 Hz (23 control and 26 deprived pairs). On average, trimming significantly raised coherence (Figure 4D, inset; K-S test, p = 0.04), with the mean increasing from 0.126 to 0.250. Both groups contained a number of pairs with little or no coherence (coherence < 0.

to allow for learn more rapid activation of multiple spines. We first confirmed that L-LTP, E-LTP, and STC could be induced by this method of glutamate uncaging applied at 0 mM Mg+2 using the single-spine stimulation protocol (Figures S5A–S5C). We then attempted to induce L-LTP by pseudosynchronous (<6 ms) stimulation of multiple spines within a single oblique tertiary apical dendritic branch (Losonczy and Magee, 2006 and Losonczy et al., 2008) in ACSF containing 1 mM Mg+2, 2 mM Ca+2, and 100 μM of the D1R agonist SKF38393 (GLU+SKF stimulation). For technical reasons, the spines had to be on the same z plane and within ∼20 μm of each other. Since it is not known how many spines need to be stimulated for L-LTP to be induced in this manner, different numbers of spines were stimulated in different experiments. When we compiled a frequency distribution of normalized spine volumes across all the experiments, we found that the distribution of spine volumes poststimulation was described by a bimodal distribution (Figure S5D). The majority of data points were part of a mode that was indistinguishable from the distribution of spine volumes resulting from fluctuations seen during the baseline period. However, there were some data points that were part of a second mode with

a higher normalized volume (Figure S5D). We defined these as potentiated spines and discovered that these data points resulted from a small proportion of stimulated spines that underwent a significant increase in volume (e.g., insets in Figure 6A, quantified in Figures 6B and 6C). We also quantified the Palbociclib manufacturer number of potentiated spines as a function of number of stimulated spines and determined that when 12 or more spines second were stimulated, a small proportion of the stimulated spines were potentiated, whereas when ten or fewer spines were stimulated, no spines were potentiated (Figure 6D).

This potentiation was dependent on protein synthesis as it was abolished when the spines were stimulated in the presence of anisomycin (Figure S5E). Unstimulated spines were never potentiated (data not shown). We repeated the experiment, but this time split the stimulated spines across two sister tertiary apical oblique branches (e.g., in Figure 6E). Under these conditions, we were unable to induce a spine volume change at any spine (Figure 6F). Thus, in addition to STC, the formation of L-LTP itself is biased toward occurring more on a single dendritic branch, further supporting the CPH. We then compared the expression of L-LTP and E-LTP induced by multispine stimulation. In these experiments, 14 spines were activated either by GLU+SKF stimulation (for L-LTP induction) or GLU stimulation (for E-LTP induction). We found that in both cases, the spines could be split into two populations—those that were potentiated, and those that were not (Figures 7A–7C).

Even less is known about how neurons respond to multisensory stimuli either before or after maternal associations form. We hypothesized that the odors of pups will modulate the way pup calls are processed by the mothers. Given that the primary auditory cortex (A1) is involved in auditory object recognition

and is a known site of neuronal plasticity (Miranda and Liu, 2009, Nelken, 2004, Nelken and Bar-Yosef, 2008, Romanski and Averbeck, 2009 and Weinberger, 2004), we tested whether it serves as an early processing station for multisensory integration of pup odors and pup calls. To test this hypothesis, we introduced pup odors to both naive and experienced female mice while monitoring the spiking output of neurons in A1. We found that pup odors triggered robust modulation of auditory processing only in females that interacted with pups. This olfactory-auditory integration had a particularly strong effect on detection selleck and discrimination of pup distress calls, suggesting that it is experience dependent. Using in vivo cell-attached recordings, we monitored both spontaneous and sound-evoked neuronal activity in A1 of anesthetized female mice. We chose this configuration because it is an unbiased sampling technique that provides stable recordings with excellent single unit isolation for long durations (DeWeese et al., 2003 and Hromádka et al., 2008). Single-cell

of pup odors induced notable alterations of spontaneous firing rates (increases or decreases) in A1 neurons, which recovered within less than 10 min after odor stimulation offset (Figure 1B). Only long (several dozens of seconds) exposure to the pup odors induced evident changes in spiking activity. To rule out the possibility that these slow changes may be simply a result of a slow buildup of responses in the olfactory epithelium, we carried out EOG recordings from the axonal nerve in between the nasal epithelium and the olfactory bulb while presenting pup odors. Pup odor presentation induced rapid (<10 s) onset and offset axonal responses of olfactory receptor axons (data not shown), suggesting that although odor responses in the olfactory system are fast, A1 cortical changes are slow. In addition, spiking activity in A1 was not synchronized to the breathing cycle (data not shown), further ruling out the possibility of fast and direct synaptic interaction between olfactory inputs and auditory neurons.

Hence, these data support the model that DLK independently promotes axonal regeneration in the proximal axon while facilitating degeneration in the distal axon. Since DLK also promotes neuronal apoptosis (Ghosh et al., 2011; Itoh et al., 2011), it functions as a key component of the neuronal injury response,

regulating cell survival, axon regeneration, and axon degeneration. Our data demonstrate that DLK promotes axonal regeneration by regulating transport of injury-derived signals. These data emphasize that injury signals and their regulators are crucial factors controlling the efficacy of in vivo axonal regeneration to functional targets. Retrograde transport-dependent injury signals including STAT3 fail to be activated upon a CNS axonal lesion (Qiu et al., 2005). We speculate that methods to promote DLK function may spur retrograde LBH589 cell line transport in CNS axons, mimicking a preconditioning injury and enhancing CNS axon regeneration. We used adult mice 3 months or older for analysis. Mouse lines are described in Supplemental Experimental Procedures. Animals were anesthetized,

a small incision was made unilaterally to expose the sciatic nerve at thigh level, and the sciatic nerve was lesioned by crush, ligation, see more or transection. The incision was closed with nylon suture and the animals were then housed until they were euthanized and samples were taken for analysis. Dissected tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 2 hr and incubated in 30% sucrose. DRGs and sciatic nerve

tissues were then embedded in OCT compound (Tissue-Tek), cryopreserved, and sectioned at 10 μm thickness. Tissue sections were then blocked in blocking solution (10% normal goat serum in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 [PBS-T]) at room temperature and subsequently incubated with primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution overnight at 4°C. Samples were then treated with two washes of PBS-T, incubation with secondary antibodies in blocking solution for 2 hr at room temperature, three washes in PBS-T, and mounting in VectaShield (Vector Laboratories). Antibodies are listed in Supplemental Experimental Procedures. Samples were imaged with a Nikon D-Eclipse C1 confocal much microscope using 10× air or 20× oil objective. Images shown are z projections of confocal stacks acquired from serial laser scanning. Adult DRG cultures were prepared as described in Supplemental Experimental Procedures. After overnight (16 hr) incubation, cultures were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min and subjected to immunostaining as described in the Immunofluorescence section. Antibodies to β3 tubulin (Tuj1; Covance) were used to label neurites. Samples were imaged with a light microscope (Nikon eclipse 80i) using a 10× air objective. To assess axon growth, we quantified at least 75 neurons per experimental set.

As can be seen in Figure 2, the frontal cortex constituted one partition, comprising all regions anterior to the central sulcus. There were also occipital, temporal, and postcentral partitions. In all cases, the highest genetic correlations were observed in the region closest to each seed. However, the pattern of positive (red/yellow) versus negative (blue/cyan) genetic correlations yielded essentially the same four divisions regardless of where in a division the seed was placed. Next, we conducted additional Selleck CH5424802 fine-grained one-dimensional marching seed analyses to determine whether boundaries of genetic correlation patterns represented gradual

abrupt transitions from positive to negative genetic correlations). The sharpest PD173074 supplier transitions were found along the A-P axis between frontal and posterior regions (Figure 3B) and along the D-V axis between parietal and temporal lobes (Figure 3C). Other boundaries had less abrupt transitions. It is possible that the boundaries in the genetic correlation patterns observed here are related to mechanisms that control the degree of compartment boundary restriction in gene expression data (Kiecker and Lumsden, 2005). One might still wonder whether our choice of seed placement (either singly or in a grid) somehow influenced this mostly lobar organization. To address

that question, we used fuzzy clustering to partition the cortex into four divisions, based on a distance matrix computed from pair-wise genetic correlations. Use of this data-driven approach, making no a priori assumptions about the locations or shapes of the clusters, yielded a pattern remarkably similar to that found using the seed point approach (Figure 4; see Figure S2 for a correlation analysis between the maps). Note that the genetic correlation matrix, the input for the clustering analysis, did not contain any spatial information (e.g., distance CYTH4 between vertices). Although the broad organization of genetic patterning is substantially similar between mice and humans, our results provide clear evidence of important species-specific differences. Specifically, the proportional size of each region is different, indicating that the 1,000-fold enlargement of cortical surface area in humans compared to mice is disproportionate across the cortex (Rakic et al., 2009). Changes in a region’s proportional size may have significant consequences with respect to brain function. For example, the genetic divisions of frontal and temporal cortices in humans are disproportionally expanded, which may be linked to the addition of cortical areas and the evolution of human traits such as language and social behavior.