Tom,
As the working group explained it to me, the text that identifies this
requirement will remain in the spec so that it is easy for a reader to
understand the WSDL 2.0 requirements. The assertion ID will be removed as
per the working group's policy that assertions highlight WSDL 2.0
requirements that are not enforced by schema validation.
Lawrence Mandel
Software Developer
IBM Rational Software
Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814 Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920
lmandel@ca.ibm.com
"Tom Jordahl" <tjordahl@adobe.com>
11/28/2006 11:24 AM
To
Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
cc
Subject
RE: Suggested removal of 2 assertions
Isn?t it reasonable to include assertions explicitly even though they may
be enforced by Schema validation?
Doesn?t this make it easier for a user of the spec to understand the
requirements?
--
Tom Jordahl
Adobe ColdFusion Team
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Lawrence Mandel
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 2:44 AM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Suggested removal of 2 assertions
I'd like to request that the following 2 assertions be removed from the
WSDL 2.0 spec. as they are all handled by the WSDL 2.0 schema and schema
validation.
Endpoint-0065
For each Endpoint component in the endpoints property of a Service
component, the name property MUST be unique.
InterfaceFault-0032
For each Interface Fault component in the interface faults property of an
Interface component, the name property must be unique.
Thanks,
Lawrence Mandel
Software Developer
IBM Rational Software
Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814 Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920
lmandel@ca.ibm.com