He has only one speaking style—rabble rousing. His entire mindset in revenge.

The good man out of the good treasure of his heart brings forth what is good; and the evil man out of the evil treasure brings forth what is evil; for his mouth speaks from that which fills his heart.
~Luke 6:45

]]>By: Left Coast Right Mindhttp://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2012/11/03/obama-campaign-tries-to-explain-his-revenge-comment/comment-page-2/#comment-2173959
Sat, 03 Nov 2012 18:54:44 +0000http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=227048#comment-2173959This is like when The Won went on a certain comedy “news” show where the host used a certain word/phrase, and then The Won used that same word/phrase in his response, and he got hammered for it. So, what did The Won’s campaign learn from this? That the second person to use the word/phrase is the one that should be castigated for it. Kind of like how the guy who retaliates on the football field draws the “Personal Foul” call.

Except that cameras, and other recording devices, allow people to go back and see/hear what actually happened.

Paul Mirengoff at Power Line is still laughing at this steaming heap by King:

King presents no evidence that Mitt Romney is a racist. He points to no federal civil rights legislation that Romney has opposed, much less would attempt to repeal. He points to nothing in Romney’s record as governor of Massachusetts that suggests hostility to civil rights for African-Americans or unwillingness to enforce their civil rights.

What, then, is the basis for King’s idiotic assertion of similarity between Romney and Andrew Johnson? King relies on the fact that, like Johnson, Romney believes in “states rights” and “mistrusts” the federal government.

But Andrew Johnson is hardly the only American president who believed in states rights and mistrusted the federal government. The same can be said of Thomas Jefferson, Ronald Reagan, and many of the presidents who came in between. Why compare Romney with Johnson, rather than Jefferson and Reagan? The answer lies in King’s intellectual dishonesty.

King’s only other argument on behalf of his comparison is that Romney “stood by as Republican-controlled state legislatures passed voter-identification laws making it harder for people of color. . .to exercise their fundamental right to vote.” King presents no evidence that such laws impose an undue burden on “people of color” and he ignores the argument that the laws are an appropriate method of preventing voting fraud. In any case, it is obscene to compare the post-Civil War Black Codes to legislation requiring voters to prove they are who they say they are.

-snip-

King offers no evidence that any of his pantomime villains resembles Andrew Johnson, either.

But being a mindlessly liberal Washington Post columnist means never having to present evidence.