<quoted text>because you habitually post idiotic mistruths, I tool the liberty of googling it to see what babble you were referring tohttp://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obamacare...Yes, you are correct. They were promising FREE OBAMACARE to the hordes.NOT.

Does HUGH like eating his soup hot? Hugh, do you know what's to be eaten in a soup, whether hot, cold, thin or thick?Remember, Mon, you eat a soup, you don't drink it.Which is your favorite soup?(smiles)

Thanks for the reminder about EATING soup.

Truthfully, I love red peas soup (kidney beans) but I also love a good FISH soup. No pun intended. In essence it is hard to say but I EAT the red peas soup far more frequently and perhaps it is because it is more readily available.

HUGH,Knowing the unclassy cruff that you are, I am sure that you don't know how to correctly pronounce the French word CROISSANT.Hugh's PRONUNCIATION of the word CROISSANT: Croys-int or Croys-ant.CORRECT PRONUNCIATION of the word CROISSANT: croo-aah-son(t)(smiles)

I always listen to the things that the classy CRUFFS like yourself say. Why? I believe that I can learn from anything.

HughBe Deuteronomy 21: 10-"When thou goest forth to war against thine enemies, and the Lord thy God hath delivered them into thine hands, and thou hast taken them captive,11 And seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a desire unto her, that thou wouldest have her to thy WIFE;12 Then thou shalt bring HER HOME to thine house, and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails; ...."

Comment: God that YOU claim to worship and OBEY condones and APPROVES of marriages of Jewish men to non-Jewish women.

On the other hand your god-men of Judaism have OVERRULED the Torah and the laws of God and are AGAINST it.

Note well what Eric, the Judahite says below. Note the Judahite's DIATRIBE or BITTER ATTACK against the commandment of God, the Torah and Tanach.

Eric---You call that Marriage. You have a PERVERTED sense of Marriage. I call that slavery.

HughBe--- His PERVERTED comment is really calling God PERVERTED as it is God who spoke of taking her for a WIFE and wife means MARRIAGE. PROOF:"And seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a desire unto her, that thou wouldest have her to thy WIFE"

Eric--I call that taking the spoils of war. I might go so far as call it RAPE under today's standards of war.

HughBe--- Eric is calling what God commanded RAPE.

Eric---And if you go on, the passage says that SHE shall be FORCED to ABANDON HER WAYS (discard her raiments) and family; i.e., forced CONVERSION. Only then can there be a marriage. But if you don't like her then you must free her. Why might you not like her? Maybe because she refused to abandon her family and ways.

HughBe---Now, I am assuming that Eric is speaking on behalf of Judaism and so note his LIE and that of Judaism. Here I am speaking about his LIE that "SHE shall be FORCED to ABANDON HER WAYS (discard her raiments) and family; i.e., forced CONVERSION."

There is NOTHING in the FULL text below that speaks about FORCED or UNFORCED CONVERSION. If you can read and understand then you shall see the TRUTH of which I speak. You shall also see and recognize another LIE of Judaism i.e. FORCED CONVERSION.

That aside this Judahite has the balls to CRITICIZE the commandment of God Almighty in a BITTER way.

Summary of what is in the text below.

1. Beautiful captive of war is seen

2. If an Israelite wants to marry her, take her home.

3. Clean her up--- "shave her head, and pare her nails" and change "raiment of her captivity"

4.Let her MOURN her family.

5. Then marry her."She will have sorrow for her father and mother for one month. After that you may go in to her and be her HUSBAND and she will be your WIFE

(HUSBAND and WIFE=marriage)

6. After marriage, "If you are not pleased with her, you should let her go wherever she wants."

7. After marriage and you let her go YOU shall not" sell her for money or act as if she were a servant because you have put her to shame."

The FULL law on marriage of Foreign women taken in battle is below.

"When thou goest forth to war against thine enemies, and the Lord thy God hath delivered them into thine hands, and thou hast taken them captive,

11 And seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a desire unto her, that thou wouldest have her to thy wife;

12 Then thou shalt bring her home to thine house, and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails;

13 And she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thine house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month: and after that thou shalt go in unto her, and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife.

14 And it shall be, if thou have no delight in her, then thou shalt let her go whither she will; but thou shalt not sell her at all for money, thou shalt not make merchandise of her, because thou hast humbled her." Deuteronomy 21:10-14 (KJV)

EBT card food stamp recipients ransack Wal-Mart stores, stealing cartsfull of food during federal computer glitchMike AdamsNatural NewsOctober 14, 2013When the federal EBT food stamp system suffered a critical failure on Saturday, local retailerswere disconnected from the federal food stamp database that keeps track of how much credit is lefton each individual EBT card. Seizing the opportunity provided by the glitch, EBT card holders inLouisiana ransacked their local Wal-Mart stores , stuffing their shopping carts full of groceriesand paying for them with near-empty EBT cards that essentially had unlimited accountbalances because all accounting was offline.When the EBT database came back online and card purchase limits were suddenly restored, EBTcard holders abandoned their full carts and just walked away, probably miffed that they missedout on participating in the felony theft of groceries.This happened at Wal-Mart stores in Springhill and Mansfield, LA. As local news station KSLAreports:Shelves in Walmart stores in Springhill and Mansfield, LA were reportedly cleared Saturday night,when the stores allowed purchases on EBT cards even though they were not showing limits.The chaos that followed ultimately required intervention from local police, and left behind numerouscarts filled to overflowing, apparently abandoned when the glitch-spurred shopping frenzy ended.The story goes on to report that one woman who racked up $700 worth of groceries had only 49cents on her card. Thats $699.51 in theft.But thats the mindset of many (but not all) EBT card holders, you see: its all about how muchthey can get away with stealing without getting caught. As it is virtually impossible to retrieve allthese stolen items from EBT cardholders, these losses are going to have to be absorbed by eitherWal-Mart or the federal government. In either case, other people must burden the cost of the theft.

They were promoting not the ACA but the community health programs (which I believe came from the Bush administration). Then they decided it would be bad PR perhaps just to use the word "free" on the ACA website. Probably because it just confuses two separate issues.

Either way - its a moot point. NOONE out there thinks the ACA is free. Thats just plain idiotic, considering the public debate.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.