[SH] Flatting ranges vs UTG standard open

I'm playing with my preflop ranges and want to get your opinion on my first go at flatting ranges vs an UTG normal open range of about 16%. Table is unknown, I know our ranges are going to vary vastly depending on table dynamics, but I also think having a standard point from which to deviate in either direction is equally important.

This might not be a contribution you wanted, but I play 6max and I'm also working on my ranges... anyway I think the exchange my questions could initiate might be EV+.

I'm interested in how you play your pockets. I can see that you don't play 88- OOP; why is that? I've played all pockets OOP vs. UTG ranges (I try to play them more vs. tight players, where I can be sure that they will have stronger holdings when I hit; sometimes I bluff 3b pre with them but that's most often vs. CO, BTN opens), and I have to say I've had a favourable result (25k sample) with that play.

Do you setmine OOP if you're getting the 1:20 odds? With high cbet, low turn aggression players you could get a chance to bluff with them UI, either with a c/r on flop or a float. Plus like I said imo they're good because you get to stack the players when you hit and it seems a profitable way to go.

I'm only flatting the suited ones. I'm still working on them, thought I might get some valuable feedback here
.

@inlovewithamsterdam: your sample is close to nothing regarding these spots, at 500 k you'll an idea after some millions you can say for sure if your strategy is profitable, but that doesn't mean that it is the most profitable or that your game did not evolve in the mean time.