That would be this Network Neutrality – the Soros, Google and other Leftist funded “solution” to a non-existent problem.

Net Neutrality is in reality the backdoor green light for the government to regulate every website on the planet.

Think we’re exaggerating?

Let’s listen to another former Free Press-er, its co-founder, Robert McChesney.

McChesney is an avowed Marxist and (shocker) a professor at the University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana.

Here’s what McChesney says is the purpose of Net Neutrality:

At the moment, the battle over network neutrality is not to completely eliminate the telephone and cable companies. We are not at that point yet. But the ultimate goal is to get rid of the media capitalists in the phone and cable companies and to divest them from control.

In other words, have the government commandeer control of (nationalize) the multi-trillion dollar Internet network.

Leaving you with the government as your sole source of Internet news, Web access and communications.

Not at all radical.

And here is but a tiny sampling of some other not-at-all-radical things McChesneyhas written:

“There is no real answer but to remove brick by brick the capitalist system itself, rebuilding the entire society on socialist principles.”A New New Deal under Obama?December 21, 2008

“Any serious effort to reform the media system would have to necessarily be part of a revolutionary program to overthrow the capitalist system itself.”The U.S. Media Reform MovementSeptember 15, 2008

“Our job is to make media reform part of our broader struggle for democracy, social justice, and, dare we say it, socialism. It is impossible to conceive of a better world with a media system that remains under the thumb of Wall Street and Madison Avenue, under the thumb of the owning class.”Journalism, Democracy, … and Class StruggleNovember 2000 issue of Monthly Review

Not at all radical.

All of this from media “reform” Free Press’s co-founder.

—–

So again we ask:

Why on Earth are Senate Democrats asking two people so intimately associated with the ultra-radical, uber-Leftist, anti-free market Free Press to testify before their Judiciary Committee?