<quoted text>NO that is not all they ever wanted.if that was the case they could have pushed for more/al benefits through civil union.They already had most of the benefits through it.It would have been a lot easier and faster to do it through civil unions.

We aren't interested in secondary institutions. If you so pro civil union, then get one for yourself. We aren't interested in them. They were created solely as a way for bigots like yourself to pretend that you were entitled to something and we weren't. You were very mistaken, as you are finding out.

Earth Angle wrote:

<quoted text>But its never really been about marriage or even benefits.That is why it won't end and the proof of that is look at this thread and how long its been here and how many posts it has.

How long this thread is, is proof of only ONE thing. That there are people passionate about marriage equality, and that there are a lot of religious bigots in the world with lots of spare time on their hands.

Earth Angle wrote:

<quoted text>what its really about is the GAY AGENDAGAY AGENDA = Forcing everyone especially the religious to accept gays and their sex practice as though it was normal.

Gays, and our sex ARE normal. You're desire to pretend otherwise is irrelevant. As for our sex, the ONLY people talking about our sex are you fundies. We gays wish you'd stop talking about our sex. It's creepy. We aren't talking about your sex, why are you always talking about our sex? Oh, that's right, because talking about our sex is part of the FUNDEAMNENTALIST AGENDA.

Earth Angle wrote:

<quoted text>and to destroy the lives of anyone who does not accept them.

Your acceptance has never been requested, nor is it required. YOU seem to think your acceptance is important to us. It isn't. We value your acceptance about as much as a Jew values the acceptance of a KKK member.

Earth Angle wrote:

<quoted text>To use the fact that they are gay as a weapon of intimidation to get ahead in jobs or anything else that they want where under normal circumstance they would have to wait their turn and possibly not succeed.

Jobs? Gee, weren't you the one that just a few days ago said that every gay was on welfare? But now we have jobs? Which is it? You really need to keep better track of your propaganda.

Earth Angle wrote:

<quoted text>that waitress was great example of the GAY AGENDAshe tried to use being a lesbian as a means of intimidating her boss as well as getting innocent people to donate money to her that she never deserved.And by using the GAY AGENDA she tried to ruin the reputation of an innocent couple who in fact actually did tip her.

Her actions were the result of her complete lack of character, not her sexual orientation. Trying to use this as an example of gays would be the same as me using Michael Vick and saying that all straights are really dog beaters. Oh, and let's address some more of your completely made up bullshit. The identity of the "innocent couple" was never public knowledge until AFTER they came forward publically, so your "ruin the reputation of..." is complete bullshit. Like everything else you state.

Earth Angle wrote:

<quoted text>Point is gay marriage and benefits was NOT all they ever wanted.

Equality is what is wanted. And just so you know, equality doesn't have stages or levels. Something is either equal or it is not. You know what isn't equal to marriage? Civil unions. Go peddle that bullshit somewhere else.

Do you know why equality is so important? Because it's a guarantee to all citizens of this country. We know how you fundies just hate that Constitution.

<quoted text>you didnt read i wrote or else you didn't understand iti wrote that it didn't have full benefits I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT PARTwhat i wrote was it would have been easier and faster to correct that then it was making marriage legal.

No, it was faster to prove that we were entitled to marriage. And we've done that. You've lost.

Earth Angel wrote:

<quoted text>ANDit would have made both sides happy .

Nope, we gays weren't happy to have a secondary institution. We are happy with marriage. Not only are we happy with them, we're fully entitled to them according to the laws of our fine nation. Thanks to that wonderful document called the Constitution. You remember that document right? It's the one you fundies abhor because it doesn't treat you special.

Earth Angel wrote:

<quoted text>Gays would the benefits they keep saying it was all about

We have the benefits. They are ours through marriage.

Earth Angel wrote:

<quoted text>Christians would still have the sanctity of marriage protected

The sanctity of marriage isn't being threatened by gays. If it were, you're side could have demonstrated that during all the initial trials. But you didn't. Know why? Cause there is no threat. "Protecting marriage" is just another propagandist fundie talking point. Maybe if you people didn't lie so much, more people would take you seriously.

Earth Angel wrote:

<quoted text>nest time read it before you wise off

this comment brought to you by the person who has demonstrated he knows nothing about anything.

QUOTEthe Abbey's "Deny Entry List." Management will also have headshots

I live in the ‘Real America’ too and more importantly, I live in the real world. I want to send a message to all those people out there who conflate Christian values with discrimination: we don’t want your kind here.”UNQUOTE

That is the gays idea of the real world.its ok if they discriminate and deny entry. Even having head photo'sbut should some baker do it then gotta attack that baker.This bar should face what that baker faced.Lets see how they handle being put out of business.But relax gays it'll never happen.Christians are not like militant gays.you gay bar is safe to display their hate.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.