By Christopher Cantwell:The Pew Research Center has released a poll showing that men are more likely to be harassed or threatened with physical violence than women on the Internet. So why arePew, Quartz, The Washington Post, CNN, and other outletsmaking this about women?Here is a video I posted about it, or you can read the transcript complete with links to the source material below:

StudioBrule: Professor Janice Fiamengo, University of Ottawa, speaks aboutthe negative effect that academic feminism has on freedom of speech.Examples of the increasingly drastic measures used to enforce adherence to policies imposed by gender ideologues clearly demonstrate the validity of Fiamengo's warning.

"The Chinese are allowing Hong Kong protests whereas in Britain, outside of parliament, the house, The Mother, The Auntie, The House of Democracy, ha, ha, ha, the land of freedom! ...They were dragged out! ...You are free to do as you are told!"The Artist Taxi Driver

"Emma's primitive proto-language speech comprised of double thinkandmonkey logic.Emma doesn't think men should be stoic and strong. Of course she does expect men to set aside their own issues to save women, which is sort of, well it requires being stoic and strong. Enter the HeforShe movement note who is acting and who is being acted upon.Even if I accept the feminist notion that women are in a state of lesser agency than men and that's bad, how does asking men to save women change this?In essence what Emma has done isthrow out the word equality like a tribalistic incantation, as if by merely uttering the word, she can magically erase the fact that she immediately follows up with some of the most primitive thoughts about gender..."Alison Tieman

Warning:further Western
attempts at blackmailing them may result in a nuclear confrontation.By ClubOrlov: A year and a half I wrote an essay on how the US chooses to view Russia, titled The Image of the Enemy.
I was living in Russia at the time, and, after observing the American
anti-Russian rhetoric and the Russian reaction to it, I made some
observations that seemed important at the time. It turns out that I
managed to spot an important trend, but given the quick pace of
developments since then, these observations are now woefully out of
date, and so here is an update.

At that time the stakes weren't very high yet. There was much noise
around a fellow named Magnitsky, a corporate lawyer-crook who got caught
and died in pretrial custody. He had been holding items for some bigger
Western crooks, who were, of course, never apprehended. The Americans
chose to treat this as a human rights violation and responded with the
so-called “Magnitsky Act” which sanctioned certain Russian individuals
who were labeled as human rights violators. Russian legislators
responded with the “Dima Yakovlev Bill,” named after a Russian orphan
adopted by Americans who killed him by leaving him in a locked car for
nine hours. This bill banned American orphan-killing fiends from
adopting any more Russian orphans. It all amounted to a silly bit of
melodrama.But what a difference a year and a half has made!

Gents
and ladies, I present to you without further adieu,
whiteribboncampaign.org. It is a website I am very proud of, and proud
to say AVfM will be investing whatever resources it takes to make
whiteribboncampaign.org the most highly recognized and iconic voice in
the worldwide White Ribbon Campaign.

By Paul Elam: The people behind the White Ribbon have undoubtedly put in a huge amount of sweat equity and actual funds in branding the White Ribbon Campaign (WRC).A simple Google search will return many, many references to that campaign and to websites that have been set up to further its message. That message, of course, is that men can stop domestic violence, that they bear the weight of all evil on their backs and that they need to create a safe world for women, blah, blah, blah.Obviously, the people getting the job done on behalf of WRC really outdid themselves on planning and marketing.Well, there was one goof. They neglected to pick up the obvious choices for domains for their program, especially given they are aiming for growth.I personally interpreted this as an intentional act. It appears to me that the good folks at WRC desire a grass roots movement, with concerned individuals stepping up to the plate to dedicate activism in the area of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV).

By Mike Buchanan:We’re calling for academics and students to stand up and fight the corruption of academia by feminists working in academia itself, in funding bodies, in the Department for Education, and elsewhere. For many years feminists have been corrupting academia for ideological reasons, but we’re convinced they can be stopped. They MUST be stopped for the sake of academia, and all it should stand for – independence of thought, excellence, and so much more.

A few examples of feminist corruption:

1. The Athena SWAN initiative forces research organisations to increase the proportion of female researchers, in order to be eligible for grants. It’s nothing less than an assault on male scientists. Last year we posted this blog piece and our associated briefing paper is here.

2. Women have long been less inclined than men to study STEM subjects – Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics – and in turn to pursue STEM careers. The reasons for women’s reluctance to enter these fields have long been well understood, but for feminists this remains ‘a problem to be solved’. The government is spending £30 million persuading young women into engineering, a career few women wish to enter, and female engineering students at Brunel University are entitled to a sponsorship of £22,750 solely on account of their gender – both stories are here.3. Professional bodies representing those working in STEM (and other) professions are actively campaigning against the interests of the class that makes up a sizeable majority of their members – men.

Devlan TheComic:The MGTOW Philosophy is spreading faster than you think. In this videos I talk about how I'm watching the MGTOW philosophy is spreading among many of my friends. I only give an example of two friends in this video but there are many others.

By Charles Hugh Smith: What I see as extremes that must necessarily end badly, others see as mere extensions of recently successful policies and trends.A long-time reader recently chastised me for using too many maybe's in my forecasts. The criticism is valid, as "on the other hand" slips all too easily from qualifying a position to rinsing it of meaning.That said, given that we're in uncharted waters, maybe's become prudent and certainty becomes extremely dangerous. I have long held that the financial policy extremes that are now considered normal are unprecedented in the modern era: extremes in debt, leverage, risk, complexity and willful obfuscation of these extremes. Consider the extent to which sky-high asset valuations and present-day "prosperity" depend on extremes of leverage: autos purchased with no money down, homes purchased with 3.5% down payments and FHA loans, stocks bought on margin, stock buybacks funded by loans, student loans issued with zero collateral, and so on--an inverted pyramid of "prosperity" resting precariously on a tiny base of actual collateral. Since we have no guide to the future other than the past, we extrapolate past trends. Human nature hasn't changed over the short time-frames of civilizations (i.e. the past few thousand years), so in terms of human drives, emotions and responses, the past is an excellent guide to the range of human responses to crisis, euphoria, greed, fear, etc. But extending trends is a shifting foundation for forecasts, as trends end and reverse, generally without telegraphing the end of an era. Few in 1639 China foresaw the collapse of the status quo Ming Dynasty a mere five years hence. With the hindsight of history, we can discern the cracks in the Ming Dynasty before its collapse, but once we shift to our own era, things become less certain. In my view, we're drifting in uncharted seas.

Subscribe To Man On Fire

Dear Reader

Are YOU Involved or Institutionalized? Our belief that the global economic crisis would persist and deepen is being vindicated and current events are now as clear as ever on the matter. Time for all of us to wake up, stand up and be counted or continue to lose all our liberties. Protect your homes and families. The sun will still rise but financial chaos and suffering due to the global fascist banksters' greed and corruption, slaughter due to the MIC's directed world wars in our name etc. is not pretty. We are feeling the effect on our society the size and like of which we have never known.

We are way past being surprised at the blanket suppression of this information by the BBC and main stream media propaganda machines. Information is clearly available elsewhere and unchallenged, accounts for a far more realistic rendition of what we have actually seen and what we continue to see develop, whilst the main stream news put out leaves many confused and bewildered, 99.9% of us wrong footed and the awakened indignant. As we can now see, the apparently 'soft fascist' powers that be aim to block these alternative avenues of information. Book up, "Long Live the Evolution."Feel free to kopimi. Angelo Agathangelou.

P.S. The MHRM, are calling out the constant misinformation disseminated by and maintain our open challenge especially to western radical feminists, to point out just one area where government in the UK, Europe or anywhere else in the English speaking world disadvantages women and girls when compared with men and boys, ...the wage disparity myth having long been debunked by serious academics and statisticians. So far this challenge has remained unanswered. Western feminism is obsolete.

The Story of Your Enslavement

George Orwell's Message: to everyone on the Internet

N.B.

These pages exist because we believe information from all perspectives should be aired, they do not necessarily reflect our views unless explicitly stated. We do not intend to cause offense, but we feel there is a need for such a shift in our society that to call it change rather than evolution would be an understatement. A velvet revolution towards living with reality for the individual, the family and society. A revolution towards living within our means and taking responsibility for ourselves, instead of mortgaging the future of our children to bloated leech faux democracy for the benefit of Ponzi 'banksters' and The Military Industrial Complex.