**** you!?
why does everything you see have to be racist?
its not that white people are racist its black people being so ******* butthurt about their ancestors being enslaved by white peoples ancestors that you cant let that **** go EVER!+******* get over yourself! it happened long ago and all involved are now dead, so theres no1 to blame anymore but you keep bitching nevertheless.
instead of bitching about the white devil having better jobs, more money and being less likely to commit crimes, how about actually making an effort to better yourselfs instead of expecting the (by now innocent) white man to guilt pay your stupid ass!
SINCERELY **** YOU!

ok for all the incompetent ***** around here lemme explain this **** to you
those 2 birds cant **** and have babies but are the same species so they are considered sub species
that woman and man can make babies together if they would have a sexy time
so they arent considered sub species of eachoter

That's not how sub-specieis are actually characterised, it's just a 'here's an easy laymen way of thinking about it.'. In fact a few quick examples that easily disprove this: Tigers and lions can mate; horses and zebras etc.

Actual characterisiation of sub-species varies depending on the type of animal but the most common ways are by appearance and genetic makeup. Under both of these categories homosapien can be divided into various racial sub-species.

Nope. Right off the Wikipedia page for subspecies.
"Organisms that belong to different subspecies of the same species are capable of interbreeding and producing fertile offspring, but they often do not interbreed in nature due to geographic isolation or other factors. "

It's funny how the title is "Not Racist", when in fact it could just as easily have been "Am Ignorant".

You see, we are all descendant from a single person way back when we were leaving Africa, and this child had a mutation that we all share today, so we are all related.

But why OP is trying to comment on is the fact that one of these two people is express a greater amount of melamine in their skin to protect themselves from harmful UV radiation from the sun, while the other person isn't. This simple self preserving act doesn't make us different sub species, it just means ones person genes are expressed more and ones aren't.

Also OP hand picked fat old black chick vs handsome young white guy, it is an anecdotal example of differences between our races that doesn't mean ****.

tl:dr, OP is a faggot and ignorant of genetics, but most people are anyway.

just so you know, it's very common for birds to be a sub-species just because they have different colors on their tail depending on the area they live, so, for biologists and all, we should have quite a bunch of human sub-species. It's just like saying that a poodle and a rottweiler are the same species just because they are dogs. That's not a comment about discrimination of race, about rights or anything like that, BUT biologically, caucasians are way more different from blacks than a Silky terrier from a yorkshire terrier

I heard that there are actually two strands of human evolution. One originating from Africa, and one originating from Europe. Not saying its true, just wondering if anyone else heard this and can back it up?

Because if we actually were different sub species, we would be called that by the scientific establishment, but were not, because we aren't.

Genetically we are the same, the only difference is phenotype and culture, and different phenotype isn't enough to make different sub species, if it did then blonde people would be a different sub species form giners or black hair people.

Well sure, but if two different groups from the some genetic source diverge enough, it's stupid to keep calling them the same species. Hell, go back far far enough and damn near EVERYTHING is descended from a common ancestor.

OP is saying that the divergence between the birds (which was not very much, looks like only minor size/color variation) is enough to merit a different "sub-species" then why isn't humanity judged on the same scale?