George Osborne Says: The Policies I and the Rest of Britain's Conservative-Liberal Government Have Been Pursuing for the Past Two Years Have Been Badly Mistaken

George Osborne:

Credit is not the only area where we can use the global confidence in our balance sheet to boost private sector growth. We are already taking action to support new house-building and infrastructure investment through government guarantees. In the next month we will set out how we can do much more.

more investment, particularly in house-building and infrastructure, would be good for "private sector growth" - demand, output and employment in the private sector;

given current policies, the private sector will not deliver this desired extra investment on its own;

nor will monetary policy, conventional or unconventional;

moreover, if the government intervenes to facilitate such extra investment the impact will not be offset by monetary policy (that is, the Bank of England will not tighten monetary policy in response because of concerns about inflation)

if the government, via government guarantees, assumes some or all the risks associated with such investments (in particular that the direct cash returns on the investment will not be sufficient to repay the borrowing) these additional fiscal liabilities will have no adverse impact - either on gilt yields in the short-run or perceived fiscal sustainability in the long run.

This chain of logic is, of course, precisely the one I and others (in particular Martin Wolf) have been outlining for some time….

[T]he government has now conceded the intellectual and economic argument. Let us hope that they proceed to deliver the meaningful policy change that we have been calling for, however it is labelled.

Comments

George Osborne Says: The Policies I and the Rest of Britain's Conservative-Liberal Government Have Been Pursuing for the Past Two Years Have Been Badly Mistaken

George Osborne:

Credit is not the only area where we can use the global confidence in our balance sheet to boost private sector growth. We are already taking action to support new house-building and infrastructure investment through government guarantees. In the next month we will set out how we can do much more.

more investment, particularly in house-building and infrastructure, would be good for "private sector growth" - demand, output and employment in the private sector;

given current policies, the private sector will not deliver this desired extra investment on its own;

nor will monetary policy, conventional or unconventional;

moreover, if the government intervenes to facilitate such extra investment the impact will not be offset by monetary policy (that is, the Bank of England will not tighten monetary policy in response because of concerns about inflation)

if the government, via government guarantees, assumes some or all the risks associated with such investments (in particular that the direct cash returns on the investment will not be sufficient to repay the borrowing) these additional fiscal liabilities will have no adverse impact - either on gilt yields in the short-run or perceived fiscal sustainability in the long run.

This chain of logic is, of course, precisely the one I and others (in particular Martin Wolf) have been outlining for some time….

[T]he government has now conceded the intellectual and economic argument. Let us hope that they proceed to deliver the meaningful policy change that we have been calling for, however it is labelled.