As your browser does not support javascript you won't be able to use all the features of the website. We strongly recommend you to enable the javascript in your old browser's settings or download a new one.

Under Armour's slump gets worse, may not make money in 2017

The Baltimore-based sports apparel company reported revenue of $1.41 billion, a decline of 5% vs the same quarter last year. It was its first year-over-year revenue decline as a public company. Analysts had expected revenue of $1.48 billion. Earnings per share came in at 22 cents, a beat compared to analyst expectations of 19 cents.

Most importantly, Under Armour slashed its full-year outlook for 2017. Management now expects 2017 full-year revenue to be up in the low single digits, whereas earlier this year it had predicted gains as high as 11%.

In a press release, Under Armour predicts full-year operating income to come in at “0 to $10 million.” In other words, the company might not cut a profit in 2017.

“Clearly this is a much different profile for the year than we discussed 90 days ago,” said acting CFO Dave Bergman on Tuesday’s earnings call. “On that call, we outlined several key factors we thought would come to fruition… demand and challenges in North America significantly altered the terrain.”

Adjusted for nonrecurring items, management expects to generate operating income of $140 million to $150 million, which would pan out to earnings per share of $0.18 to $0.20.

What’s going wrong for Under Armour?

The biggest problem area for Under Armour right now is its most important region: North America.

Revenue in North America fell 12% to $1.07 billion, with wholesale revenue down 13% to $880 million. Direct to consumer revenue was up 15% to $468 million. This means consumers who like Under Armour are continuing to order product directly from the company. But they are not buying the brand in sporting goods stores; or when they do, it is at a discount.

U.S. sports apparel is an increasingly promotional environment, meaning that brands are offering a lot of discounts and sales. Back in January, when Under Armour’s streak of 26 straight quarters with 20% or higher revenue growth first ended, Plank identified the discounting problem, and it has only gotten worse since then.

“The role both we and our retailers expect us to play is as a premium, full-price brand,” Plank said at the time. (More recently, in August, he framed things in starker terms: “We’re pivoting.”)

“It demonstrates issues with the brand and its proposition,” a GlobalData Retail analyst said. “Especially so since other brands and retailers… have not posted such calamitous figures.”

After all, Adidas is flying high in North America. The German giant is cool again in America, and its stock has responded, up 44% in 2017 so far. Nike is up 6% in that time, Under Armour is down 53%.

Under Armour also saw declines in categories that have been shaky for the entire sports apparel market: golf gear, outdoor gear, and basketball footwear.

All “performance” gear (apparel and footwear worn for playing sports) has sold poorly in the U.S. for over a year now, and that’s debilitating to Under Armour, which is a performance-first company. UA “has got to figure out the sportswear business,” says NPD Group analyst Matt Powell. “We are deep in a non-performance cycle.”