Hi all,
I have a cycle similar to the following in my program:
while true do
Thread.delay mydelay;
print_float Unix.gettimeofday ();
print_newline()
done
If I put the delay into the cycle, I can't get less than 1/100 of second
delay, on any machine I do this test. Is there a portable function that
can do a shorter delay, say 1/1000 of second ad least?
BTW, I have found a problem in using Sys.time and Thread.delay together:
if I DON'T use Thread.delay, Sys.time returns an increasing value, as
it's expected to. If I do a cycle like
while true do
Thread.delay mydelay;
print_float Sys.time ();
print_newline()
done
Sys.time returns an almost constant value! This also happens if I use
Unix.select [] [] [] mydelay instead of Thread.delay. I suspect this
happens because some sort of counter gets reset by a delay, but this
makes no sense.
If this might be a bug I'll do the bug report.
thanks for attention
Vincenzo
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners