Re: Repository Tagging, why don't we do it?

From: Dennis Gilmore <dennis ausil us>

To: epel-devel-list redhat com

Subject: Re: Repository Tagging, why don't we do it?

Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 11:05:21 -0500

On Monday 08 June 2009 09:55:56 am Adam Miller wrote:
> There was a topic of conversation that was brought up in #rhel that I
> wanted to address here on the mailing lists. What about repo tagging?
> Why do (all that I know of) other 3rd party repositories seem to tag
> their packages in respect to their repo such as foo-0.1.i386.el5.rf or
> foo-0.1.i386.el5.at (or however the method is preferred) and we don't?
>
> Just wanted to post the question here because I didn't/don't have the
> answer.
>
> Thanks,
> -Adam
It was debated in great length when epel started. please go back and read the
mailing lists if you want to know.
Dennis

Attachment:
signature.ascDescription: This is a digitally signed message part.