I'll bet not... seriously. You'll see that in that article they never really say that Emmerich is considering Jacko, just that Jacko was interestdd in the part.

Or, it could have been a completely bogus piece altogether. Who knows? But I would lay money on Michael Jackson NOT being in a any major motion picture, especially in a lead role in a big budget film like King Tut.

did you all hear that Colin's frontal nudity in his latest movie was edited? His "schlong" was too large! According to the writer of the article I read, "The women were too distracted, and the men seemed uncomfortable". They lost rack of the movies story-line. Go Figure!!

did you all hear that Colin's frontal nudity in his latest movie was edited? His "schlong" was too large! According to the writer of the article I read, "The women were too distracted, and the men seemed uncomfortable". They lost rack of the movies story-line. Go Figure!!

Okay, I'm not a huge nudity person, (and I probably wouldn't be allowed to watch that movie anyways), but from a feminist standpoint: THAT IS SO DUMB!! Women are bombed by unattainable goals of thinness, beauty, boob size etc. constantly throughout the day. Why does the media have to worry about men's insecurity?? I mean come on! You're small! Get over it!!! (If anyone's wondering, I'm in the middle of reading that book "The Beauty Myth". Maybe I've had enough feminist propaganda. *shrugs*)

[quote="PharoahKel"]Colin has full frontal nudity??? I AM SO GOING!! lol

You're outta luc, PharoahKel! It was decided to cut it from the film.
There is some hope, though. When it's realeased on DVD, it will probably be included. They usually have cut scenes shown as extras!

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum