Pages

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

It looks like researchers Bill Munns, Matt Moneymaker, and Dr. Jeff Meldrum, and 3 other people in the universe has been privileged enough to view the Erickson Project videos. It's clear that an NDA is suppressing people to come forward to tell the truth about what they've seen. Even today, Meldrum does not feel he is fully at liberty to discuss the videos. Munns has put up a challenge asking witnesses to spill the beans if they disagree, but he is clearly sidestepping to avoid legal problems.
"If my display of this chart causes anyone to feel that they should file some type of civil action against me, please have your lawyer contact me at wmunns@gte.net so we can set an appointment for my receiving the service of papers, and we can discuss the matter on the public record, in a court," Munns wrote after posting an image comparing Erickson's images to a wookie mask.

Moneymaker has also stated that he's not at liberty to discuss the video. "I don't want to comment on things that aren't officially released by the copyright holder. Copyright holder did release sleeper," Matt replied to one question on Twitter.

Now here comes Meldrum who offered this vague opinion about what he saw on Facebook:

Appears Bill has gone public on this. He showed the comparisons to me during my last visit there. I had seen the footage briefly during my visit to Kentucky years ago. It was not what I would have expected and yet there was something familiar about it. Since I wasn’t at liberty to discuss it then and had no opportunity to review it, it was simply tucked a way in a vague recess of memory. When Bill showed me his chart, the penny dropped. It was all too clear.

When will you skeptards stop hating on Bill? He's been extremely professional. Just because you guys hate his opinion on the PGF doesn't you the right to attempt to falsely discredit him. I've seen how you guys use whatever you can to discredit him on the JREF. Is that what you call critical thinking? I thought we were supposed to get to the truth.

Ha ha, you're hilarious. I'll eat my wookie mask if any footer ever actually files a lawsuit over the supposed breaching of an NDA. You footers love to blather on and on about NDA's and have no clue what's involved in successfully pursuing such an action. There are at least five defenses I can think up off the top of my head. Not only that, but the Plaintiff would have to prove damages which would involve showing the fake video.

The argument would have to be that the disclosure of the video adversely affected someone's ability to make money by perpetrating a hoax on gullible footers. Good luck with that.

The most likely scenario would be that the person attempting to enforce the NDA would get laughed out of court and be forced to pay the Defendant's attorneys fees and costs.

You can't violate a NDA if you didn't enter into it. Bill never signed any NDA about the Matilda footage therefore he's under no legal obligation not to discuss it. (The person he got the stills from may have accessed them under an NDA and they might be actionable but that's purely conjecture at this point.)There may be a case for a copyright claim but as Bill said, if anyone wants to step up and claim copyright on the footage he's perfectly happy for that to happen.

An NDA doesn't have magical powers to stop everyone in the world from talking about something, people actually have to enter into an agreement and sign paperwork before they're bound by it.

Why is there always talk of suit on here? Are you people that poor that this is your only hope for a winfall? That all your hopes and aspiration is suit for a Nda or libel? How about going to school then you wouldn't have to hope someone opens their mouth for you to make something of you life.

If someone really had one or solid footage of one, they'd contact Nat Geo, Discovery or some extremely rich eccentric to handle the publicity. They'd get paid, but if they really had one, someone would want the fame and credit that would go along with the discovery. I'm just saying...

Munns did a favor for the people who refused to see the long delay was an awfully good sign Erickson had nothing. And I'm talking about his statement on the BFF last year. This release is just a mop up operation. Are more than 10 people really surprised the doc has nothing good?

I don't think anybody I'd going to take legal action against an opinion of a video. This is just another I'm going to make this sound legitimate bs ploy tactic. The other looser hoaxers have used the same legal bs talk. Oh I can't show it....you can't see it because of legal problems. Try a different tactic were tired of this one.

The Patterson/Gimlin film shows a real animal that is not human in structure, measurements were taken using the latest technological equipment available in the crime lab and shows that no human without extensive skeletal changes in the upper body could have been in a suit. Both the arm and leg lengths match perfectly, which means that the one they call Patty can easily walk on all four limbs unlike a human.

Yes he became lame quite soon after his nose fell off which was a shame because he probably would have been able to smell and outrun the bear he disturbed and got mauled by the only thing that saved him was his terrible halitosis and mange which the bear just could not stomach, he is recovering now from a bizarre accident with cement mixer which meant the amputation of one of his legs and his tail but we still love old Lucky dearly.

Matilda was a ploy to strip hard earned money from unsuspecting footers, if anything I think Adrian Erickson should be sued for fraud. Even the released 'sleeper' has the fakest looking fur, if Adrian baby put this sham together to float his floundering real estate biz, he is the scumbag. Munns is now a hero of sorts, throwing himself on the sword of truth, consequences be damned. He did the right thing.

Bro, in court they would have to testify, under oath, they weren't hoaxing. If they had real, high-def video of an unknown animal. there's no legit reason they woulda sat on it this long. Real, high-def video? Man talk about a bidding war between SyFy,Animal Planet and History, maybe Nat Geo. If the video was good, maybe a network.

Each week you sat on it, if you knew you had the goods, you would also know you ran a risk of getting beat to market, seriously diminishing the massive payday you could expect. So the secrecy? Hoax. Plain, simple hoax.

No one talks because they all are hoaxing. This whole bigfoot craze is insane.No proof EVER. No bodies, no real clear photos or films, no real footprints that couldn't be made artificially.What a money making scam it all is.Are any of the scientists involved really credible? One has to wonder.

I predict Moneymaker will slowly distance himself from Erickson soon and start attacking to make himself look like the voice of reason and honesty, like he did with Melba and countless others whose hoaxing was revealed.

Munns did more for bigfootery by releasing this gem, than you ever will by your sarcastic laden bile. Erickson is a playboy scammer. Munns is the honest soul here. A NDA about a lie holds no water. It doesn't matter because doesn't Dyer have a body?

Dudes, no one is suing anyone in the bigfoot world. To sue someone, you have to go to court. In court, they expect you to tell the truth and they will uncover the truth. The whole bigfoot scam will be exposed. No one wants that.

You are forgetting that some nut sued Matt Moneymaker 1 or 2 years ago for defamation of character or some bull. Matt said the guy acted like a crazy man on an expedition and the guy's balls got twisted and he filed suit. It was all very, very stupid...

Ken: Justin passed who's polygraph? Would you believe someone that runs through the woods at night screaming and howling, stopping only to shine very bright lights and wood knock, that expresses that this is how to see, capture or whatever, the most elusive, most intelligent, of all wilderness creatures. How can people like that be taken seriously about anything? If the story read Bigfoot shot by Justin while being beeten with a large chunk of wood by Moneymker, and being howled at by BOO BOO and questioned by Renea. That is much more plausible.

You know what's funny? Every time a hoax is revealed, all you footers say "hoaxers should be sent to prison for the rest of their lives for making us look stupid!"But then Munns reveals Erickson as the scam artist he is an now all you footers say "Munns is a jerk for violating copyright and ruining Erickson's movie!"It's sad, and it's because all you footers are still desperately clinging to Melba and her DNA study. If it's revealed that Erickson is a fraud, then Melba using his footage with her paper will pretty much erase whatever hope you had left that this whole soap opera would prove Bigfoot's existence.I feel sorry for you. I can only imagine how terrible it must be to realize how much time you've wasted arguing Bigfoot's existence.:(

I will tell you what I think is even funnier...you...you know way to much about the subject then a lot of the people you call footers which means you have spent a great deal of your time reading up on everything bigfoot and hanging out on blogs like this, and don't give me that old line about I am just here for entertainment or social observation crap because no one believes it.What your doing is wasting your life on an obsession which has no end game, it's hollow and empty and when you are old enough you will wish you could have all that time back you wasted in your life hating on others instead of being a better human being and getting on with the things that are more important in this world, and if you do not know what they are then asking your physician is a good place to start.

^ How long do you think it takes to bone up on this stuff. Are you kidding? The same shit has been floating around since the 70's. The poster is probably a monster kid...This is the internet, though. Could be a nut, like you say. I am both : )

I like to be a Hater!! It keeps me warm at night when I lay down and bed and think of complete morons like Anon 5:27. I even get hard at the thought of open hand slapping him, ie bitch slapping him Mmmmmmm...

^Lol..so you are a nut! Are you a monster kid too? I have an excellent copy of "Shriek of the Mutilated" unedited and with the hit song "Popcorn" still in the soundtrack. The versions coming out now all have this song taken out because the band wants royalties...

I can hear the Judge now..."Let me get this straight..You are sueing him because he spoke to soon about about your hoaxed Sasquatch Video?" Yes, your Honor. (Judge and courtroom explodes with laughter)

I'd love to be the attorney representing Munns in such an action. In discovery, I'd be able to force Erickson to produce all the videos and a list of everyone associated with the project. I would then conduct depositions with each one of those people, including the original habituators on whose property Matilda and the bigfoot family supposedly lived. It's a scream that you seem to actually believe that Erickson would file a lawsuit and subject himself to such an inquiry.

Yes, and the fact that the film was finished God knows how long ago but was never released does not help. Financial damages? He could not sell his home made Monsterquest before Munns pissed on the pancakes. NEXT CASE!

Ken: Now when another of these people add a comment or even a half assed pic or video blob, it's like another spoon full of water poured into the Atlantic ocean. I am slowly loosing all faith and hope in the possibility.

Ken: hey My friend, good to see you on dood. This stuff has become such a soap opera full of jokes that are not at all funny ya know bro. You'd think some of these so called experts would tell one shred of fact or truth wouldn't you man. H.B.

It was like you said yesterday or the day before I stopped didn't have time to comment but I used to say the same thing how do these guys claim expert on a beast never caught I said once it's not like he's coming to the Payless these people work at to get his feet measured or his hair felt how are they an expert on s**t

Ken: Self proclamation my friend. It's the only field you can actually wake up a well driller in the morning, or in the case of BOBO a fishermen, and go to bed a top field researcher. Now that takes some real quick learning wouldn't you think? It's all fun and games and sadly misplaced monies my friend. H.B. we are going to just be what we are, but at least it's honest bro.

Exactly like the commercial you wouldn't want your dr doing your job and the dr pitches then ducks the line drive to the head that's one thing I love is going to work at someone's house and they say oh I'd never do that or I'd never stick my hands in there or my personal favorite aren't you gonna turn the breakers or panel off and I look at them like do I look like a rookie to you if so why would you let me work in your home in the first place

Ilived down the road from the site. and the footage is real. we have been seeing this thing for years. There is a woman down the road that feeds it. just like her mother did before her. the woman never told anyone someone else called the bf people. She kept telling them to leave her alone.

Munns and now Meldrum has exposed Erickson for the fraudulent farce he is. This turd actually thought he could record a few seconds of a reworked Chewbacca mask and fool people. The only people he successfully fooled are the degenerates in this field. The truth hurts you moronic buffoons. If you still believe its legit after Munns and Meldrum have commented on it then you're likely fucking brain dead, period.

Believing Erickson EVER had ANY legit Sasquatch footage was retardedly unfathomable. You degenerates were too stupid to listen when I told you years ago that this documentary was nothing but an attempt at money grubbing off of hoaxed footage. Did you SERIOUSLY believe that if Erickson had legit footage that he would just sit back for all of these years without major networks /news outlets etc etc buying this "legit" (LMFAO) footage? Real video of a Sasquatch would have been an earth shattering discovery and Erickson would have been world famous. Did you really think Erickson wouldn't have been all over something like that?

You fucktards better smarten up before your brains fall through your anus, idiots, all of you.

No Erickson would not. If you got the real thing the last thing you want to do is create a circus at your study site. I know everyone in this project and also met the homeowners. I have also talked to over 12 local people who have seen it with their own eyes. I have seen the video not just a still. You calling people fucktards shows real education on your part.

Funny how everyone likes to blast on everything someone else gets. I seen the comp. with the masks and I dont think it is a mask. I seen something very similar in tenn. back in the early 80s. plus wasnt that star wars thing supposedly copied from someones eyewitness of a bigfoot.

I also looked very closely at the comparison of matilda and the mask.I see differences in the mouths and the noses and in the bottom frame I see a eyelid on matilda that I dont see on the mask.The chin on matilda also looks smaller.

That may seem odd, but in fact, it is a very effective mode for people with some degrees of visual impairment, since when you focus on white letters, you are focussing on light itself. The adobe reader is what you need to download e - Book in PDF format. Even so, the registry may be corrupted, destroyed, clogged up, or infected causing Windows to be unable to read the files effectively.