A Demon We Must Eradicate

Pirates off the coast of Somalia have had a field day this year, successfully capturing 39 vessels including a Saudi supertanker. Navies from around the world are steaming around the Gulf of Aden trying to provide some cover in a joint task force. But so far, the most that has happened is eight pirates picked up in Somali waters were dropped off in Kenya for trial.

The most common reaction to this situation is incredulity, an amazement that this is a problem in this modern era. But should we really be surprised at these blatant attacks?

Denmark, which is leading the joint task force this year, caught ten pirates in September but released them after six days of “sweating” in a “hot container.” Why were they released? Because the Danish authorities, both military and civilian, couldn’t figure out what to do with them. If they were made to stand trial in neighboring countries, they may have faced the death penalty. And if they were brought back to Denmark, they could “seek asylum.” So the Danes dropped them on a Somali beach near where they lived, restored to them their non-weapon personal effects, and bade them good luck. In a repeat incident earlier this month, the Danish “warship” caught two pirate boats, confiscated the weapons, and let the pirates go. One of the pirate ships sank due to weather, but the Danes refused to send crews to recover that boat so that the pirates might learn a lesson.

It’s not just the pacifist Europeans either. The United States naval commander recommended that merchant vessels learn defensive maneuvers and maybe consider carrying armed guards. For Admiral Gortney, the answer is “on the beach—Somalia—assuring security and stability and making sure the conditions that breed pirates are no longer there.” The Pentagon press secretary concurs that the situation “requires a holistic approach from the international community at sea, ashore, with governance, with economic development.” I guess the administration wants to formalize the ransoms that the Somali pirates are demanding by taking the money from the shipping companies (and all of us) and then paying protection money to Somalia in the form of foreign aid. Maybe if they got handouts, the “thinking” goes, they wouldn’t need to acquire machine guns and take to the seas.

A Wall Street Journal op-ed’s title said everything I was thinking on this subject: “Why Don’t We Hang Pirates Anymore?” It turns out that Articles 100 through 111 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea are unsurprisingly milquetoast on this issue. It suggests in Article 100 that “all States shall cooperate to the fullest possible extent in the repression of piracy on the high seas or in any other place outside the jurisdiction of any State.” But then it says in Article 110 that a warship cannot even board a pirate ship except to verify its right to fly its flag. Once piracy is established, Article 105 allows for the courts to mete out punishment. But as the current chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said, “one of the challenges that we have—you have in piracy clearly is, if you are intervening and you capture pirates, is there a path to prosecute them?

While a functioning state in Somalia is the best prescription for ending piracy in its waters, that is beyond a proper foreign policy. These pirates are violating individual rights wholesale; we must stop them through force. The United States military must expands its rules of engagement to lethal and decisive levels even though no pirate has yet dared to attack an American merchant ship. Safety on the high seas is always in our interest and we must muster the fortitude our forefathers did during the Barbary wars.

2 Comments so far ↓

It seems only the Russians are willing to take appropriate action against the pirates. And that’s a sad state of affairs.

“November 25, 2008: Russia is planning to send more warships to the Somali coast, along with some commandos and a particularly Russian style of counter-piracy operations. In other words, the Russians plan to go old school on the Somali pirates, and use force to rescue ships currently held, and act ruthlessly against real or suspected pirates it encounters at sea. ”

Altruism in action once again. The proper response would be to destroy all such pirate ships. But to do that would be “mean” and self-assertive. Such thing are forbidden in today’s world. The combination of pragmatism and altruism has reached the point where the West is openly suicidal. How long can this last?

National Security Workforce to Address ‘Intersectionality’: do you ever get the sense that you’re in a waking nightmare? Money quote from the memo: “Our greatest asset in protecting the homeland and advancing our interests abroad is the talent and diversity of our national security workforce.”

Last Week Tonight on Donald Trump: bit long, but great takedown of the Trump mythos. In a more rational political environment, this would have killed his presidential campaign. I’m not sure it’ll make any difference.

A Responsibility I Take Seriously: nominee must be “without any particular ideology or agenda” and have “a keen understanding that justice is not about abstract legal theory, nor some footnote in a dusty casebook.” I sure hope the Republicans can hold the line on his nominations.

Trigger Warnings in Annapolis: I’m not sure why I expected the service academies to be bastions of academic freedom, but I did. It’s much worse than the universities since they’re far more hierarchical.

Announcing the Twitter Trust & Safety Council: this is within their rights, of course. Given the leftist leanings of the company and its assembled Council of Goodspeech, I suspect that some groups will get a pass and some will face suppression. Chilling at any rate.