B-257568,B-257568.2,B-257568.3: Oct 18, 1994

Additional Materials:

Contact:

A firm protested the Department of Energy's (DOE) rejection of its bid for a glass melter technologies demonstration, contending that: (1) DOE improperly evaluated the technical proposals; and (2) one of the bidders should have been excluded from negotiations because of a conflict of interest. GAO held that: (1) DOE reasonably determined that the protester's bid was nonresponsive; and (2) the protester was not prejudiced by DOE use of another bidder's employees on the source evaluation board. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Mar 19, 2018

AMAR Health IT, LLCWe dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.

Mar 13, 2018

Interoperability ClearinghouseWe dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.