As a real physicist I find this kind of thing a little bit insulting. You are referring to bits and pieces from quantum mechanics, but I don't believe you have studied this material sufficiently to have anything intelligent to contribute.

This kind of QM is very dated and does not represent the best of our knowledge relating to particle physics or the microscopic scale.

I would really like to see how your theory relates to quantum electrodynamics. QED works amazingly well at predicting the behavior of particles on the micro-scale, and is a beautifully consistent theory. Please explain how you can generate an abstract description of motion (equation) from your theory and how it relates to reality as we know it. That is, is there a way, using your theory, to derive a mathematical expression that correlates with anything that we observe in reality as we know it?

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23524705

no, really

just

your entire model if flawedQED MY ASS

how are you , Mr REAL PHYSICIST going to derive a mathematical expression that correlates with anythingif your notation for said expression if fundamentally a joke

you've spent your entire pitiful existence being fed NONSENSICAL BULLSHIT FROM THE ESTABLISHMENT "SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY"who's only job is to prevent you from ever learning the truth or the mechanisms of nature and creation

you have fully succumbed to the

and you know how they got ya ?

with false logic and FALSE MATH

go back to your institution of higher learningthrow away all the bullshit texts and study one thing

ONE THING ONLY

Sir William Rowan Hamilton's NABLA

and right away

The right hand side oneand the Left Hand sign one

yes there are TWO

Learn what happens when two opposing Rotational forces (curl) interact with each other in an electromagnetic field

learn that their product is NOT ZERO

Get your calculation in the right model encompassing all the variables

after you have done that

"derive a mathematical expression that correlates with anything that we observe in reality"

Saptaparna ~ Seven-leaves, sevenfold; the man-plant, sevenfold man, seven-principled human being. ~ Spinning infinity. The wheel is spinning me and it's never ending.~ What if I say I'm not like the others? What if I say I'm not just another one of of your plays?

Walter Russell - "Light does not travel. The light and heat which appear to come from the star or the sun has never left the star or the sun. That which man sees as light and feels as heat is the reproduced counterpart of the light and of the heat which is its cause."\

This is difficult to grasp from our perspective because we are currently experiencing Time.

Let me illustrate, a little bit.

We are 3 dimensional. Length, width, and height, we shall call it. We like to believe that these things are finite... so we will start by discussing that. If you have a cube that is 1cm^3... what does that mean? The measurement itself needs a reference point... something that i is relative to. However, no matter what you try to make the reference point there will always be an infinite gradient of measurements possible. This is what we know as "fractions", essentially. Between 0-1 there is an infinite number of fractions. For example, if we look at an atom, you know that it is possible to measure 1/2 of the atom, or 1/4, or 1/8, or 1/16, etc etc. There is an infinite number of "smaller"(relative word) measurements that are possible. Now we know that, because there is the possibility of infinitely small measurements, there is likely an infinite LARGE measurement. That is to say that the universe/reality/everything is infinite in size... both "small" and "big".

Now let's move back a dimension. We'll cut away "height" and assume that there is only length and width now. As previously shown, we know that these two directions of measurement are infinite in scope. But what about their non-existent height? Technically, would they not have an infinitely small height due to it's nonexistence? There MUST be a corresponding element within 2 dimensional existence to account for the lack of height.

I propose that from OUR perspective we are "progressing" through time. This perspective is simply a result of our existing from a 3rd dimensional point of view, and in reality time itself is just another infinite measurement. I believe that the 2d equivalent to this would be some sort of progression through "height".

But it's all just a sort of illusion of consciousness because ALL dimensions are existing simultaneously.

As for your assumption that 0 does not exist... I completely disagree. Nothing, or zero, MUST exist in order for EVERYTHING to exist. It MUST exist because it acts as a counter-balance to existence... sort of like every action having an equal and opposite reaction from a physical standpoint. Everything in existence has an opposite of some sort. Sort of like two poles of the same magnet... they are COMPLETELY related, and yet opposite at the same time.

The universe is both nothing and everything all at the same time.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15876775

As such ZERO in the balancing point,the neutral place where everything is equal.

Viktor Schauberger, Walter Russell and John Worrel Keely have much to contribute to this discussion.

One may also note that the square and compass which are the essence of the freemason symbol are found in Marko Rodins mapping of the 3,6,9 and his "doubling circuits" 1,2,4,8,7,5 combined.

Furthermore the Vedic literature has all these answers written down over 5000 years ago and it is well known that Tesla was in communication with Vedic Scholars.

I highly recommend the "Vedic Cosmos" Video as well. If someone can refute the concept that there is only one sun in the universe I would be very impressed. I cannot find any evidence and I've been looking into this material for over 20 years. The only things modern scientists and physicist can point to as evidence of a second (or more) sun in the universe is two blips on a screen apparently rotating.

Viktor Schauberger, Walter Russell and John Worrel Keely have much to contribute to this discussion.

One may also note that the square and compass which are the essence of the freemason symbol are found in Marko Rodins mapping of the 3,6,9 and his "doubling circuits" 1,2,4,8,7,5 combined.

Furthermore the Vedic literature has all these answers written down over 5000 years ago and it is well known that Tesla was in communication with Vedic Scholars.

I highly recommend the "Vedic Cosmos" Video as well. If someone can refute the concept that there is only one sun in the universe I would be very impressed. I cannot find any evidence and I've been looking into this material for over 20 years. The only things modern scientists and physicist can point to as evidence of a second (or more) sun in the universe is two blips on a screen apparently rotating.

As a real physicist I find this kind of thing a little bit insulting. You are referring to bits and pieces from quantum mechanics, but I don't believe you have studied this material sufficiently to have anything intelligent to contribute.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23524705

After 7 years of studying quantum/esoteric physics in both the university and at home. I came to the conclusion that Quantum mechanics is based on seeing many angles of vision simultaneously and building a (more) complete picture from the combined views. Therefore looking only from your western scientific view will give a less complete picture. One must branch out into those realms which are not "respected" by modern western sceince.

Viktor Schauberger, Walter Russell and John Worrel Keely have much to contribute to this discussion.

One may also note that the square and compass which are the essence of the freemason symbol are found in Marko Rodins mapping of the 3,6,9 and his "doubling circuits" 1,2,4,8,7,5 combined.

Furthermore the Vedic literature has all these answers written down over 5000 years ago and it is well known that Tesla was in communication with Vedic Scholars.

I highly recommend the "Vedic Cosmos" Video as well. If someone can refute the concept that there is only one sun in the universe I would be very impressed. I cannot find any evidence and I've been looking into this material for over 20 years. The only things modern scientists and physicist can point to as evidence of a second (or more) sun in the universe is two blips on a screen apparently rotating.

If I can in a few words...limited physical experience defines creative responsibility necessary to manifest balance of empathy without detraction of self whilst still conferring an enlightening riddle for the singular effect that the singular cause requires.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6933310

thanksthe singular effect is the singular cause of all things what is the singular effect caused bywhat is the cause of causegoing through the singular effect to see what is it`s cause we discover all things which exist are the cause of singular effect

incorporate /z\ eternal , no beginning, no end

thus we may possess the notion that eternal is the singular effect caused by the structure (ingredients) of eternity as in:it is the effect that holds 2 or more things togetherwhat holds 2 or more things together, something in between them both they both are attracted to

thus we may consider that the singular effect is the feeling that possess all things to be "as one in infinite structure" and the singular effects steers through feeling the function(s) of the infinite structure

what we discover is the infinite structure is always composed of infinite structure (all things) and the singular effect is always the singular thing that effects all things