By James Craven, Professor of Economics and Geography :"What do these 5 failures have in common other than two of them war criminals with Nobel Peace Prizes, one of them seeking a Nobel non-stop? ALL five of them, were brought into Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and/or Bilderberg and/or Bohemian Grove prior to being known or viable politically; all of them were brought in as calculated plants to run in elections with covert backing on all levels and/or run as controlled opposition or insurance. ​I do not care a wit about Trump except that he makes these creatures possible and viable, makes them look almost qualified in comparison--and vice versa, Trump becomes thinkable from unthinkable, viable from non-viable in comparison to what the Dems put up. Each needs the other in comparison to be even in the ball park of viability politically and to have access to the really big money and connections that all must have to have any chance to win."I wouldn't trust these five guys.

Antonino Ilardo:"As sad as it is, we can post whatever we like, they don't care about us! They have made us poor and poorer the last 30 years. They have been doing a lot of wars and buried in the sand about $12 trillions of the USA in deficit, so about 66% of the actual USA debts. They for sure enjoy that we can all write our thoughts. Result, they can control us much better than ever. Happy Social, dear LinkedIn friends."

​ "JUST WHEN YOU THOUGHTJews would cease and desist from their warmongering, along comes Victoria Nuland’s husband clamoring for more war.“Raw force remains a key element in international politics,” writes neocon Jew Robert Kagan in a feature piece for the Wall Street Journal.But Jews don’t send their own when it comes to “raw force” but rather it’s young Goys who are sent off to wars for the Jews.With fiasco after fiasco in using “raw force” in “international politics,” (Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya…all of which Jews cheered for), Kagan and his bloodthirsty Jewish friends (including his wife, Victoria Nuland—(born Nudelman)—are on a brand new campaign.Their target this time is Vladimir Putin (who they fear) and an emerging Orthodox Christian Russia (which sends shivers down their spines.)Touting the outright LIE of “Russia’s invasion of Eastern Ukraine,” Kagan couples Putin with Hitler as having “grievances of his own” which should not be responded to in the same way as Hitler’s “grievances” with a “policy of appeasement.”“Oh, we tried to reason with Hitler, to accept his grievances and seek to assuage him to avoid war,” saysKagan, “but nothing could be done to prevent him from dictating his own terms of an international order. He didn’t think like we did.”Sound familiar? Putin’s not going along with Zionism, Jewish imperialism, and the hegemony of the Jew-enabled dollar. He “doesn’t think” like the Jews who rule America.“This searing experience,” continues Kagan, “of failing to satisfy those who couldn’t be satisfied, shaped US policy in the postwar era. We had to be well-armed against the next stirring of the non-liberal, atavistic urges that were a permanent feature of humankind.”That “next stirring” is the ‘threat’ of Christian Russia against which in another unwinnable war Kagan and his tribe with their atavistic urges want to send more Goys to their deaths.Jews don’t send their own to die in their wars. Let the Goys do their bidding.​​WHAT’S PARTICULARLY TELLINGis that America was once a friend and ally of Tsarist Russia, a partner in promulgating the Christian faith.The 1832 Russia-US Treaty began with the words, “In The Name Of The Most Holy and Indivisible Trinity.”But that all came to an end in 1913 when Jewry harassed President Taft out of office for his support of “preferred trade” with Russia and installed their puppet Woodrow Wilson instead.Now with their Shwartza in the White House, puppeteering is easy work for the Jews.

THEANTIMEDIA.ORG by Josh Paniagua And it gets a lot worse. Have you heard of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)? He's also a member of that notoriously blood thirsty organization. Capitol Hill isn’t presenting much competition for President Obama’s nominee for secretary of defense Ashton Carter. In fact, he isn’t facing a single significant threat to his campaign and has received bipartisan recognition. Surprised? I’m not. After years of badgering the White House about the repeal of the Budget Control Act (BCA), it seems that the Senate Armed Services Committee is happy to see Obama’s pick on their side.But the Pentagon’s love story isn’t what I want to focus on here. What concerns me is Ashton Carter’s apparent intentions to further empower the US military as an opponent to BCA and and his ambition to advance US globalization.During his hearing, Carter openly condemned the BCA, stating that former secretary Robert Gates was on the right track with his budget plan which required $70 billion in additional military spending.Yes, Carter. Let’s throw another $70 billion to the military when the US is on the brink of another economic crash. Add another $70 billion into an utterly failing foreign policy, that sounds about right.

“Our country has friends and allies in every corner of the world and our adversaries have few… all this makes me proud and hopeful and determined to grab hold of the bright opportunities in front of us, as well as to counter the very real dangers we face. These dangers… include continuing turmoil in the middle-east and North Africa and the malignant and savage terrorism emanating from it, an ongoing war in Afghanistan, the reversion to old-style security thinking in parts of Europe, the long standing tensions from the past and the rapid changes in Asia and the continuing need for the stabilizing roll of the United States in that region which is so important to the future, the continuing imperative to counter the spread-or-use of weapons of mass destruction.”Haven’t we all heard this before? We saw the same exact thing before invading Iraq, killing their leader, and scratching our heads when the WMD’s we went after were seemingly imaginary. This idea that it is our duty to invade and occupy countries simply because we don’t like what they’re doing is absurd, especially when one considers the vile and despicable things that our own politicians have done. Torture reports, anyone?Carter has made it clear that when he is confirmed as new Secretary of Defense, he will see to it that the permanent termination of ISIL/ISIS becomes top priority. I find this part to be particularly interesting, only because the day immediately before his hearing, ISIS released a video of the execution of a Jordanian pilot causing John McCain to open the hearing with a 10 minute spew about the dangers of ISIS and his irritation at the BCA.Ashton Carter, who unsurprisingly has received a free-pass from the corporate media, is also a member of theCouncil on Foreign Relations (CFR) and a former employee of Goldman Sachs. He also has deep ties to military contracting firms and the Military-Industrial-Complex, which creates an inherent conflict of interest with his soon-to-be job of Secretary of Defense. Surprised?Is it just me or do you smell war? Watch the whole confirmation hearing here. February 5, 2014 http://theantimedia.org/secretary-of-defense-ashton-carter-goldman-sachs/