and many more benefits!

GMAT Club Timer Informer

Hi GMATClubber!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Hide Tags

Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson,
[#permalink]

Show Tags

Updated on: 02 Nov 2018, 00:22

13

1

69

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

71%(00:54) correct 29%(00:58) wrong based on 3975 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to draw a soldier's pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.

(A) 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become

(B) 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become

(C) 22, and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being

(D) 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was

Most Helpful Expert Reply

Re: Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson,
[#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Apr 2018, 00:22

12

7

Quote:

(A) 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become

I often hear people say that (A) isn’t parallel: “…Deborah Sampson… joined the Continental Army…, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783…” That’s actually completely fine: we have three parallel verbs, and they make perfect sense, since they are three actions that Sampson performed.

The objection is usually that the three verbs “aren’t in the same form” or “don’t sound the same.” Neither of those are legitimate objections. All that really matters is that they’re three verbs that logically are three actions performed by the subject of the clause. It’s not a problem that one is an action verb (“joined”) and the other two are states of being (“was injured” and “was discharged”).

The only other potential issue is the past perfect tense (“had become”) at the end of the sentence. We can only use past perfect tense to describe an action that happened in the past, but BEFORE some other past action, which is usually in simple past tense. And we have that: she “had become too ill too serve” before she “was discharged.”

So let’s keep (A).

Quote:

(B) 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become

My biggest issue is with the phrase “while being discharged in 1783.” Literally, that seems to be saying that she simultaneously was discharged and was injured three times in 1783. And that makes no sense – there’s no way that those things can happen at the same exact time.

Plus, I think we would need an “and” somewhere in here: there are several actions, and at least two of them (“joined the Continental Army” and “was injured three times”) already seem to be parallel. So the “and” is necessary.

That’s enough to eliminate (B).

Quote:

(C) 22, and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being

Now this is a weird mess. Sampson “joined the Continental Army… and was injured… and discharged…” Huh? First of all, those three actions (“joined”, “was injured”, and “was discharged”) are logically parallel to each other, so we only need one “and” – not two.

Second, it’s wrong to say that Sampson “discharged in 1783.” We could say that she WAS discharged from the Army, or I guess we could say that she “discharged a weapon” (a semi-obscure way to say that she fired it). But you wouldn’t just say that “Sampson… discharged.”

And “being” is also a mess. It seems to be trying to act as a modifier of some sort, but that’s rarely an acceptable use on the GMAT. (More on “being” here.)

So we have tons of reasons to ditch (C).

Quote:

(D) 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was

(D) isn’t too bad, but it doesn’t make sense to say that Sampson “injured three times.” You can say that she WAS injured three times, or maybe that she injured three enemy soldiers. But you can’t say that she “injured three times.”

And that’s enough to disqualify (D).

Quote:

(E) 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being

Whenever you see a “having + verb” construction on the GMAT, it generally needs to be the first of two past actions. So you could say something like “having studied all night, Souvik collapsed on the sofa and watched three consecutive Marvel films.” In other words, he studied first, and then collapsed. Fair enough.

But in (E), it sounds like Sampson was injured and discharged first, and THEN she joined the Army. And that makes no sense at all.

We also have a problem with “being”, which is apparently being used as a modifier in (E) – and that’s a use that we almost never see on correct GMAT questions. “Being” isn’t always wrong on the GMAT, but it’s probably wrong here.

But even if you really love “being” in (E) for some inexplicable reason, we still have lots of reasons to eliminate (E). And we’re left with (A).
_________________

Need an expert reply?Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Most Helpful Community Reply

Re: Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson,
[#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Apr 2013, 11:44

6

3

Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to drawa soldier’s pension, joined the Continental Army in1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.(A) 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become(B) 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become(C) 22 and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being(D) 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was(E) 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being

first of all i will say that verb-ed form is either acts as a verb or as a modifier

verb-ed -->this will act as a verb when subject itself does this (verb-ed thing) action ex: alex played well ....here played is acting as verbverb-ed--->this will act as a modifier when this (verb-ed thing) is not done by the subject.

now coming to questionhere the subject is Deborah Sampsonin the non underlined part it is written Deborah Sampson joined......here "joined" acts as a verbin the underlined part it is written Deborah Sampson...was injured .....,and was discharged....so its list kind of thing x,y,and z therefore x,y,z should be parallel..now----- joined ,was injured ,and was discharged are all verb so its parallel....note if in place of was injured....only injured is written and in place of " was discharged "only discharged is written then in that case discharged and injured act as modifier as in option C,D,E.....HENCE it is not parallel to JOINED .....so it is wrong

now choosing answer(A) 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become(parallel so correct)(B) 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become( meaning is wrong ..in this it means she was injured and discharged simultaneously...which is not the intended meaning)(C) 22 and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being(...here joined ,was injured are verb while discharged is modifier so non parallel therefore incorrect)(D) 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was(again injured is not parallel.....so incorrect)(E) 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being( againg discharged is modifier and not verb ,...and therefore not parallel....also it means having been injured and discharged ..both actions are occuring together which is not correct.

hope it helps..SKM
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

Re: Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson,
[#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Mar 2013, 22:43

2

2

thangvietnam wrote:

I agree that "D" is incorrect because "injured" should be "was injuredd"

but in A "had done" happens before "joined". this is not logic

why A can be correct? pls explain.

No, thats not the case over here. It is of supreme importance to understand the meaning before diving into Grammar. Remember, Grammar is nothing but a set of rules to communicate the meaning in a better way

So, what does the sentence talks about i.e Meaning : The sentence talks about a Deborah Sampson and defines a list of 3 items about her. What are they-1- joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, 2- was injured three times, and3 - was discharged in 1783 because she had become tooill to serve.

Now, had becomhe is used for doing the sequencing with the action "DISCHARGED", not with the ACTION "joined". If you are still in doubt, check the clause(clause C1) - "because she had become too ill to serve." --> This clause is Subordinate to the Clause (clause C2)- "Deborah was discharged"i.e Clause C1 is working as an adverbial modifier of the Clause C2

i.e it gives the explanation to why Debrah was discharged, - answer is - because she had become too ill. - this shows that she was ill from a distant past, and then some time in the past(ofcourse after the first event), she got discharged.

Hence, Had become is used to show sequencing with the verb discharged.

Another thought -Had the sentence been;

was discharged in 1783 because she became too ill to serve. the meaning would have that both the events happened at the same time, and have the same importance.

Re: Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson,
[#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Jul 2013, 02:09

1

Maybe experts can pitch in.

Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to draw a soldierâ€™s pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.

A. 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become- Verb sequencing is correctB. 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become- Changes the original meaning when it says 'while being discharged'C. 22, and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being- Being ill to serve becomes a modifer and it should be close to the noun. Also being changes the meaningD. 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was- injured three times is a modifier or looks like. So hold itE. 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being- Same as C_________________

I've failed over and over and over again in my life and that is why I succeed--Michael JordanKudos drives a person to better himself every single time. So Pls give it generouslyWont give up till i hit a 700+

Re: Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson,
[#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Jan 2014, 13:37

1

KC wrote:

Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to draw a soldierâ€™s pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.

A. 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had becomeB. 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had becomeC. 22, and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, beingD. 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she wasE. 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being

We need correct parallelism. Injured and discharged need to be parallel

A) "was injured" and "AND was discharged" both use the same type of verb (past participle), preserving the same "form" of verbs is paramount for correct parallelism. Furthermore, the "and" before "discharged" indicates immediately that this option is correct because THREE verbs are being paralleled (joined.. was injured.. and was discharged..) all three have the same past participle. You ALWAYS have to add "and" to the third parallel when using >2 entities in your parallel structure.

B) "was injured" is not parallel to "while being discharged".. B is gone

C) "and" after injured is superflous, this creates redundancy when discharged brings up "and" again. Also, and prior to injured implies only joined and injured are parallel, but this is incorrect. C is gone

D) The past participle "injured" needs to have a was/were, depending on if the subject is singular or plural. Deborah is singular, so we need "was injured". Injured on its own creates a fragmented sentence. So D is wrong.

E) The first error that pops up is in fact not the the parallel, but the ending word "being". Being is often a red flag, in this case this present participle does not make sense since we are talking about a event that happened a long time ago and is not still going on. Other than that, "having been" does not nicely follow "joined" and thus the prallel structure is distorted. So E is gone.

Re: Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson,
[#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Apr 2014, 10:02

Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to draw a soldierâ€™s pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.

A. 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become B. 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become C. 22, and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being D. 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was E. 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being

Re: Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson,
[#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Apr 2014, 15:41

Mission2012 wrote:

Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to draw a soldierâ€™s pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.

A. 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become B. 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become C. 22, and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being D. 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was E. 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being

No problem with the underlined part of the sentence.

My question is on the opening modifier.

Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff

How come a verb-ed modifier parallel to verb-ing modifier.

Hi @Mission2012, First of all I am glad that you are viewing the sentence in its entirety and are not just focusing on the underlined portion of the sentence. Secondly, a verb-ing modifier and verb-ed modifier can definitely be parallel to each other. Please go through the article on this topic in the link below:parallelism-imperfect-list-142791.html

Do let me know if you have any other questions.Regards,Payal
_________________

Re: Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson,
[#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Jul 2014, 10:26

egmat wrote:

Mission2012 wrote:

Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to draw a soldierâ€™s pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.

A. 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become B. 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become C. 22, and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being D. 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was E. 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being

No problem with the underlined part of the sentence.

My question is on the opening modifier.

Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff

How come a verb-ed modifier parallel to verb-ing modifier.

Hi @Mission2012, First of all I am glad that you are viewing the sentence in its entirety and are not just focusing on the underlined portion of the sentence. Secondly, a verb-ing modifier and verb-ed modifier can definitely be parallel to each other. Please go through the article on this topic in the link below:parallelism-imperfect-list-142791.html

Do let me know if you have any other questions.Regards,Payal

Hi Payal,

Though A is right choice and has a list, isn't this Q a case of single subject with many verbs?

e.g. She Joined the Army, was injured three times, and was discharged.

Could you please clarify if this is not a run on sentence? Thanks for your help.

Re: Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson,
[#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Jul 2014, 11:59

2

asagraw wrote:

Hi Payal,

Though A is right choice and has a list, isn't this Q a case of single subject with many verbs?

e.g. She Joined the Army, was injured three times, and was discharged.

Could you please clarify if this is not a run on sentence? Thanks for your help.

Regards,Ashish

Hi Ashsish,

Thanks for posting you question here.

Yes, you are absolutely correct. This is certainly a question with single Subject that has multiple Verbs. And all the Verbs are part of a parallel list in which all the entities are perfectly connected to each other with the conjunction "and".

This is CERTAINLY NOT a run-on sentence. A sentence is called a run-on sentence when two Independent Clauses (ICs) are joined together just with a comma. For example: if we write this sentence in the following way, then it will be called a run-on sentence:

Shejoined the Army, shewas injured three times.

Structurally this sentence is incorrect because a Comma CANNOT join two ICs.

You might have gotten confused about the run-on structure in this sentence because you probably thought that there are three clauses in this sentence because there are three verbs. But that's not the case. Every clause, be it Dependent or Independent, must have an exclusive SV pair. If a Subject has more than one Verb, then we still have ONE clause because the Verbs share the same Subject. In order to form two clauses, we need two exclusive SV pairs as we have in the run-on example sentence above.

Re: Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson,
[#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Jan 2015, 22:41

This doubt could be fairly basic but I would really appreciate if someone could help me clear my concept. In the above question I understand that 3 verbs need to be parallel but why injured and discharged should appear with a helping verb while joined appears without a helping verb. How is parallelism maintained in this case. I really got confused with tense and verb basics.

Re: Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson,
[#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Jan 2015, 08:50

2

MarketingGuru wrote:

This doubt could be fairly basic but I would really appreciate if someone could help me clear my concept. In the above question I understand that 3 verbs need to be parallel but why injured and discharged should appear with a helping verb while joined appears without a helping verb. How is parallelism maintained in this case. I really got confused with tense and verb basics.

Hi! Parallelism does not require that a helping verb can only be parallel with another helping verb. For example, following would be correct:

MarketingGuru was inclined to specialize in Marketing, but later majored in Strategy.

was, a helping verb, is parallel to the non-helping verb majored.

In the sentence under consideration, Deborah Sampson was injured three times is correct, because we actually cannot remove was, since the meaning would be non-sensical: Deborah Sampson injured three times would non-sensically mean that Deborah Sampson injured <someone> three times. This is clearly not the intended meaning.
_________________

Re: Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson,
[#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Apr 2015, 01:58

egmat wrote:

asagraw wrote:

Hi Payal,

Though A is right choice and has a list, isn't this Q a case of single subject with many verbs?

e.g. She Joined the Army, was injured three times, and was discharged.

Could you please clarify if this is not a run on sentence? Thanks for your help.

Regards,Ashish

Hi Ashsish,

Thanks for posting you question here.

Yes, you are absolutely correct. This is certainly a question with single Subject that has multiple Verbs. And all the Verbs are part of a parallel list in which all the entities are perfectly connected to each other with the conjunction "and".

This is CERTAINLY NOT a run-on sentence. A sentence is called a run-on sentence when two Independent Clauses (ICs) are joined together just with a comma. For example: if we write this sentence in the following way, then it will be called a run-on sentence:

Shejoined the Army, shewas injured three times.

Structurally this sentence is incorrect because a Comma CANNOT join two ICs.

You might have gotten confused about the run-on structure in this sentence because you probably thought that there are three clauses in this sentence because there are three verbs. But that's not the case. Every clause, be it Dependent or Independent, must have an exclusive SV pair. If a Subject has more than one Verb, then we still have ONE clause because the Verbs share the same Subject. In order to form two clauses, we need two exclusive SV pairs as we have in the run-on example sentence above.

Hope this helps. Thanks.SJ

Is the use of past perfect mandatory? Is the below sentence correct?I was discharged from hospital because I felt better.or past perfect is needed?

Re: Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson,
[#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Apr 2015, 01:51

1

b2bt wrote:

Is the use of past perfect mandatory? Is the below sentence correct?I was discharged from hospital because I felt better.or past perfect is needed?

Hi b2bt, There is a slight difference between the current sentence and the one you have cited.

This is ok: I was discharged from hospital because I felt better. - Past

But this is not: I was discharged from hospital because I felt well for 10 days. - Past

What would be correct is: I was discharged from hospital because I had felt well for 10 days. – Past Perfect

Similarly, in the current sentence:

This is ok: Deborah Sampson was discharged because she was too ill to serve. - Past

But this is not: Deborah Sampson was discharged because she became too ill to serve. - Past

What would be correct is: Deborah Sampson was discharged because she had become too ill to serve. – Past Perfect

They key difference is obviously phrases such as for 10 days and become too ill, both of which indicate a process that started in the past and continued till the time that the other event in the past happened (the event of discharge in this case). This is when past perfect is used.

In any case, even if you thought that simple past was ok, and chose option D, hope it was clear that injured is used as a verb in option D, thereby suggesting that Deborah Sampson actually injured someone else; in reality, Deborah Sampson actually was injured. This meaning is not coming out in D.

Re: Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson,
[#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Oct 2015, 22:07

Quoting Ron

Quote:

you can actually solve this problem on the basis of parallelism and verb form alone.you have a SEQUENCE OF EVENTS, so they should be PARALLEL.also, "was injured" and "was discharged" should be in the passive voice, since deborah sampson was the recipient (not the agent) of these actions.

so you need "joined..., was injured..., and was discharged...."the only choice that does this is (a).

Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying

Joined: 19 Feb 2007

Posts: 4568

Location: India

WE: Education (Education)

Re: Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson,
[#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Feb 2016, 08:50

1

(A) 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become --- correct choice

(B) 22 was injured three times while being discharged in 1783 because she had become -- meaning changed; it implies that she was injured during her discharge

(C) 22 and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being -- and was and discharged – lapse in parallelism(D) 22, injured three times and was discharged in 1783 because she was –lapse in parallelism, not clear whether she injured or she was injured. Injured and was discharged is ungrammatical.

(E) 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being -- having been …modifies her joining the army at 22, implying as though she joined the army because she was injured three times; being as a modifier is also incorrect.

_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quoteNo one knows this better than a GMAT student does. Narendran +9198845 44509

Re: Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson,
[#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Jul 2016, 00:14

1

This a perfect example to how little, one needs to do to get a correct answer in GMAT. This sentence is laden with modifier and adjective phrases, which for all purposes can be removed and thus leaving us a clean easy sentence to analyse and correct.

Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shuttieff,Deborah Sampson , the first woman to draw a soldier's pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.

Now the sentence become Deborah Sampson joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.

(A) 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become Correct :- injured and discharge are parallel. "Had become" is correct because first she become ill and then after a few days/weeks was discharged. When we have two past actions use to "had" is correct for the older action and simple past is used for newer actions.

(B) 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had becomeWrong:- Meaning change. She did not become ill while she was being discharged.

(C) 22 and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, beingWrong:- "being too ill to serve" is incorrect. Makes the voice passive.

(D) 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she wasWrong:- "injured three times" is incorrect. was injured three times should be correct.

(E) 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, beingWrong:- Tenses are all wrong; having, injured are not parallel. Sentence all sorts of problems.

z3nith wrote:

Dressed as a man and using the name RobertShurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to drawa soldier’s pension, joined the Continental Army in1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, andwas discharged in 1783 because she had become tooill to serve.(A) 22, was injured three times, and was dischargedin 1783 because she had become(B) 22, was injured three times, while beingdischarged in 1783 because she had become(C) 22 and was injured three times, and dischargedin 1783, being(D) 22, injured three times, and was discharged in1783 because she was(E) 22, having been injured three times anddischarged in 1783, being

I am confused between A and E. I am really not sure what does "having been injured" refers to ?

_________________

Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly.FINAL GOODBYE :- 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017 - I am back but for all purposes please consider me semi-retired.

Show Tags

Whenever you see a “having + verb” construction on the GMAT, it generally needs to be the first of two past actions. So you could say something like “having studied all night, Souvik collapsed on the sofa and watched three consecutive Marvel films.” In other words, he studied first, and then collapsed. Fair enough.

Do we treat coma + having as a verb or as a noun modifier showing how / result of preceding clause?
_________________

It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination.

gmatclubot

Re: Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, &nbs
[#permalink]
17 Apr 2018, 07:47