InfoWars/PrisonPlanet (Alex Jones’s websites) released a youtube video about something called neomasculinity:

I noticed several things about the video. While it used game language and other language from this part of the internet, it’s clear that whoever wrote the script for that video didn’t really understand what we talk about. MGTOW gets attacked (which has led to responses from MGTOW like Barbarossa). Overall, this is another attempt at entryism by tradcons with some game terms used as an unsuccessful attempt to hide that it is an attempt at entryism.

This is nothing new. It’s just another form of Game 2.0/Man Up 2.0, an attempt to repackage game for the benefit of women (and in this case Alex Jones’s bank account). This is the same thing Susan Walsh, the Manhood Academy/Manhood 101 morons, and others have tried and failed to do. This time it has a dash of, “you have to get married because DEPOPULATION AGENDA!!!” (which is why believing in the depopulation agenda is misandry) and “They (whoever they is) are putting chemicals in the water to turn you gay”, but it’s really no different. It’s an extreme form of the tradcon cry, “You have to get married to save civilization”.

I am certain that Alex Jones’s attempt at entryism will fail. We have dealt with entryist tradcons before. Tradcons have nothing to offer game, MGTOW (or the M(H)RM) so neither does Alex Jones. No one is impressed by, “You have to get married to save civilization”, so no one will be impressed by, “You have to get married to save civilization because DEPOPULATION AGENDA!!!” We may see a few guys planning on pulling a Mark Minter use neomasculinity as a cover, but that will be it. We don’t need Mark Minters so good riddance to them.

The more tradcons attack MGTOW, the more popular it becomes. Let Alex Jones attack MGTOW and try his attempt at entryism. He will fail, and MGTOW will be more popular afterwards.

While false sexual harassment accusations still have teeth, many men know that the false sexual harassment industry exists. Many men limit their contact with women at work to strictly professional matters with witnesses. Even when a woman successfully gets a man fired with a false sexual harassment accusation, many of her male coworkers will start avoiding her. This is why false false sexual harassment accusation is ingenious. It uses our knowledge of the false sexual harassment industry against us and combines with most men’s tendency to defend women whatever the circumstances. It makes us think that a woman who says that a man tried to get her to make a false sexual harassment claim must be pro-male because she refused to make a false sexual harassment claim against a man. This is a form of entryism into anti-feminism similar to how a woman like WoolyBumbleBee was able to infiltrate AVFM or the attempts of women like Susan Walsh to create Game 2.0 or the red pill women.

Another danger of the false false sexual harassment industry is that it is narrative where women and not men are the victims of the sexual harassment industry. This is will give women who make a false sexual harassment accusation a get out of jail free card by blaming a nearby man. And this won’t be limited to the false sexual harassment industry either. The same thing will happen with the false rape industry, the false abuse industry, etc. That is why we have to be vigilant against this sort of thing. We can’t allow women to get out of making a false accusation against a man by making a false accusation against another man.

I very rarely disagree with Paul Elam openly. This is because he gets lots of “criticism” that’s baseless and all around silly nonsense that boils down to “Paul Elam is a godless commie or leftist”, “Paul Elam is a male version of a feminist”, “Paul Elam isn’t doing things my way or making the M(H)RM all about my pet issue”, “AVFM is insufficiently ‘Christian’ or ‘libertarian'”, “Paul Elam hates the white race”, or “Paul Elam and his terminology doesn’t follow my obscure philosophy”. Adding my own disagreements, while minor, just creates an atmosphere of “see everyone hates Paul Elam”. Also, Paul Elam (& AVFM) are in the trenches actually doing something a lot more than any of us. They have a better idea of what would work to advance the M(H)RM from that alone than I ever could.

She also happens to be a former AVFM’er, proving AVFM needs to vet the women more stringently

Yes, AVFM needs to vet women (and men) joining it more stringently, because entryism is going to be an increasing problem. (Entryism is when a group infiltrates another group, usually larger, in an attempt to expand their political or ideological base.) We have already seen attempts at entryism in the M(H)RM from groups like the tradcons and the white (knight) nationalists. In the game world, Susan Walsh was an entryist trying to create a “Game 2.0”. (In fact, WBB is basically the Susan Walsh of the M(H)RM.) As the M(H)RM expands in numbers and gets closer to the mainstream, the entryists will get more numerous and more sophisticated. They will do a better job maintaining a pretense of supporting the M(H)RM than the tradcons or the white (knight) nationalists ever did.

How do we identify entryists in the M(H)RM? We can’t assume that only women will be entryists. Even though a woman is more likely to be an entryist than a man, both men and women can be entryists. As time goes on there will be more entryists. For now at least, the way to identify entryists like WBB is to find out their opinion on MGTOW. Since MGTOW isn’t a movement of any kind, entryist tactics won’t work on it. Thus, sooner or later an entryist will express their disgust and revulsion for MGTOW and will try to separate the M(H)RM from the MGTOW because MGTOW is a threat to what they’re trying to do. If someone in the M(H)RM isn’t at least willing to leave MGTOW alone, then they’re definitely an entryist.