nmm 22 4500ICPSR28501MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR28501MiAaIMiAaI
The 1915 Iowa State Census Project
[electronic resource]
Claudia Goldin
,
Lawrence Katz
2010-12-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR28501NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The 1915 Iowa State Census is a unique document. It was the first census in the United States to include information on education and income prior to the United States Federal Census of 1940. It contains considerable detail on other aspects of individuals and households, e.g., religion, wealth and years in the United States and Iowa. The Iowa State Census of 1915 was a complete sample of the residents of the state and the returns were written by census takers (assessors) on index cards. These cards were kept in the Iowa State Archives in Des Moines and were microfilmed in 1986 by the Genealogical Society of Salt Lake City.
The census cards were sorted by county, although large cities (those having more than 25,000 residents) were grouped separately. Within each county or large city, records were alphabetized by last name and within last name by first name.
This data set includes individual-level records for three of the largest Iowa cities (Des Moines, Dubuque, and Davenport; the Sioux City films were unreadable) and for ten counties that did not contain a large city. (Additional details on sample selection are available in the documentation). Variables include name, age, place of residence, earnings, education, birthplace, religion, marital status, race, occupation, military service, among others. Data on familial ties between records are also included.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28501.v1
census dataicpsrfamily structureicpsrfertilityicpsrhealthicpsrhouseholdsicpsrimmigrationicpsrmigrationicpsrmortalityicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsDSDR V. Migration and Population DistributionDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthICPSR I.A.4. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Other Census, Including County and City Data BooksDSDR III. Health and MortalityGoldin, ClaudiaKatz, LawrenceInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)28501Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28501.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35299MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35299MiAaIMiAaI
2001 Chilean Social Mobility Survey
[electronic resource]
Florencia Torche
,
Guillermo Wormald
2015-04-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35299NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The 2001 Chilean Social Mobility Survey examined inter-generational and intra-generational mobility in Chile. The data contain information on adult Chilean men's education, migration, current job, first job, social origins (parents' education, occupation, assets and living standards when the respondent was 14 years old), wife/partner, inter-generational transfers, household income and assets, respondent's siblings and focal brother, and respondent's opinions about inequality and determinants of economic well-being. Demographic variables include sex, age, education level, and socio-economic status.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35299.v1
educationicpsremploymenticpsrfamiliesicpsrincomeicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrpropertyicpsrsocial inequalityicpsrsocial mobilityicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrworkicpsrDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR V. Migration and Population DistributionTorche, FlorenciaWormald, GuillermoInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35299Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35299.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04549MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04549MiAaIMiAaI
The 500 Family Study [1998-2000
[electronic resource]United States]
Barbara Schneider
,
Linda J Waite
2008-06-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR4549NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
location, activities, who they were with, and psychological
states. Several Likert and semantic-differential scales were used to
assess participants' psychological states.
The
Parent Data
contains basic demographic
information from respondents as well as detailed information about
parents' occupation job duties, income, work schedule, benefits (e.g.,
medical care, flexible work schedules, and family leave), and the
consequences of their jobs (e.g. long hours, job stress, having to
work weekends). Additionally, the data contain information about the
extent to which parents experienced work-family conflict and what
changes might help with better balance of the demands of work and
family (e.g., more flexible work hours, more help from spouses with
household and child care responsibilities, improved child care, and
after-school care arrangements). Parental attitudes toward traditional
arrangements, how household tasks were actually divided among family
members, and how often the family paid for services (e.g., cleaning,
yard work, meal preparation) were also captured. The data also contain
information about how children are socialized in families with two
working parents. Topics about the frequency with which parents engaged
in various activities with their children (e.g., talking, eating meals
together, attending religious services), how frequently parents
monitored their teenager's activities, and how often they talked with
their teenager about school activities, plans for college, career
plans, friendships, and peer pressure.
The
Adolescent Data
contains data for sixth through
twelfth graders, which focuses on family relationships and
experiences, school experiences, paid work, psychological well-being
and behavioral problems, and plans for the future (e.g., college,
career, and marriage -- including expectations regarding spouses'
sharing of responsibility for child care, cooking, chores, and paid
work). To allow for comparison of parents' and adolescents' responses
to similar questions, several items appear in both the adolescent and
parent data. These items include the frequency with which parents and
adolescents discuss school events, college and career plans,
participation in religious and other activities, gender role attitudes
and the division of household tasks within the family, and items
measuring depression, stress, and anxiety.
Qualitative Data -- Interviews
The main
purpose of the interviews was to explore topics addressed in the
parent and adolescent surveys in greater detail. Parent interviews
were designed to examine how working parents cope with the demands of
work and family life. Adolescent interviews touched on similar themes
but altered questions to gauge the adolescent's perceptions of their
parents work and family lives. Kindergartner interviews were brief and
focused on children's after-school and child care arrangements and
time spent with parents.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04549.v1
child careicpsrchild rearingicpsradolescentsicpsrdomestic responsibilitiesicpsrdual career familiesicpsreveryday lifeicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfamily work relationshipicpsrhouseworkicpsrjob satisfactionicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrlifestylesicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrquality of lifeicpsrschool age childrenicpsrsocial interactionicpsrsocial lifeicpsrstressicpsrtime utilizationicpsrworkicpsrworking hoursicpsrDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityCCEERC II.D. Parent/Family Practices and StructureCCEERC II.C. Involvement in Child Care and Early EducationCCEERC II. Parents and FamiliesCCEERC II.D.1. Childrearing and Household LaborICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderCCEERC II.C.3. Parent-ChildCCEERC II.D.2. Families and WorkDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsSchneider, BarbaraWaite, Linda JInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4549Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04549.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR24501MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR24501MiAaIMiAaI
American Housing Survey 2007
[electronic resource]Metropolitan Survey
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2009-10-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR24501NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The metropolitan survey is conducted in even-numbered years, cycling through a set of 41 metropolitan areas, surveying each one about once every 6 years. This data collection provides information on the characteristics of a metropolitan sample of housing units, including apartments, single-family homes, mobile homes, and vacant housing units. The data are presented in seven separate parts: Part 1, Work Done Record (Replacement or Addition to the House), Part 2, Journey to Work Record, Part 3, Mortgages (Owners Only), Part 4, Housing Unit Record (Main Record), Recodes (One Record per Housing Unit), and Weights, Part 5, Manager and Owner Record (Renters Only), Part 6, Person Record, and Part 7, Mover Group Record. Data include year the structure was built, type and number of living quarters, occupancy status, access, number of rooms, presence of commercial establishments on the property, and property value. Additional data focus on kitchen and plumbing facilities, types of heating fuel used, source of water, sewage disposal, heating and air-conditioning equipment, and major additions, alterations, or repairs to the property. Information provided on housing expenses includes monthly mortgage or rent payments, cost of services such as utilities, garbage collection, and property insurance, and amount of real estate taxes paid in the previous year. Also included is information on whether the household received government assistance to help pay heating or cooling costs or for other energy-related services. Similar data are provided for housing units previously occupied by respondents who had recently moved. Additionally, indicators of housing and neighborhood quality are supplied. Housing quality variables include privacy of bedrooms, condition of kitchen facilities, basement or roof leakage, breakdowns of plumbing facilities and equipment, and overall opinion of the structure. For quality of neighborhood, variables include use of exterminator services, existence of boarded-up buildings, and overall quality of the neighborhood. In addition to housing characteristics, some demographic data are provided on household members, such as age, sex, race, marital status, income, and relationship to householder. Additional data provided on the householder include years of school completed, Spanish origin, length of residence, and length of occupancy.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24501.v1
commuting (travel)icpsrincomeicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrMetropolitan Statisitcal Areasicpsrmunicipal servicesicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrproperty insuranceicpsrproperty taxesicpsrproperty valuesicpsrrelocationicpsrrental housingicpsrenergy assistanceicpsrtransportationicpsrutility ratesicpsrenergy conservationicpsrhome ownershipicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhousing costicpsrhousing occupancyicpsrhousing unitsicpsrRCMD VII. HousingICPSR I.A.2. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, American Housing Survey SeriesDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)24501Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24501.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25921MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25921MiAaIMiAaI
Chicago Longitudinal Study, 1986-1989
[electronic resource]
Arthur Reynolds
2014-03-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR25921NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
emphasis is given to factors and experiences that are alterable by program or policy intervention both within and outside of schools. Besides information on early childhood intervention, information has been collected on classroom adjustment, parent involvement and parenting practices, grade retention and special education placement, school mobility, educational expectations of children, teachers, and parents, and on the school learning environment.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25921.v1
censusicpsrchild developmenticpsreducational programsicpsrelementary educationicpsrmathematicsicpsrminoritiesicpsrparentsicpsrpovertyicpsrpublic assistance programsicpsrreadingicpsrrisk factorsicpsrschoolsicpsrscienceicpsrstudent attitudesicpsrCCEERC XII. Parent, School, and Community School Readiness/Child School Success and PerformanceICPSR II. Community and Urban StudiesCCEERC I. Children and Child DevelopmentCCEERC VI.A. ProgramsDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsCCEERC I.B. Child Development and School ReadinessCCEERC VI. Programs, Interventions and CurriculaPK3 I. PreK-3rd Data Resource Center ICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesCCEERC XII.C. School Performance and SuccessDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsCCEERC VI.A.10. Integrated Services ProgramsICPSR V.A. Education, United StatesReynolds, ArthurInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25921Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25921.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27001MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27001MiAaIMiAaI
Child Care and Children with Special Needs
[electronic resource]Challenges for Low Income Families, 2002-2005
Helen Ward
,
Lisa Morris
2010-12-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR27001NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This project was a mixed-method, multi-level study of low income families of children with special needs and the system which served them, focusing primarily on child care, employment, and balancing work and family. This approach included an analysis of existing national and state-level data sets, statewide surveys of parents and child care providers, and a field study to look at these issues at the local level in three selected communities in the state of Maine: Portland, Lewiston/Auburn, and Presque Isle. While the primary focus was on access to child care, this project also looked at the related issues of welfare reform, the impact of work force participation on having a child with special needs, and the issue of coordination of early intervention services with the child care system. The goal was to understand better the issues facing low income families with special needs children across the programs and policies affecting their employment, access to child care, and meeting the special needs of their children. In the first year of the study, qualitative research was conducted to learn directly from parents about their experiences. In the second and third years, a field study of three communities was conducted as well as statewide surveys and analysis of national data bases to supplement the data collected in the first year. This data collection is comprised of the two quantitative data files produced during the second and third years of the study which are described in more detail below.
Child Care Provider Survey: The Child Care Provider Survey was a statewide survey of child care providers selected at random from the list of licensed providers in Maine given by the state licensing agency. Questions focused on the perspective of child care providers on the issues of access and inclusion that parents raised.
Parent Survey: The Parent Survey was a statewide survey of parents and children aged 0-18 years with diagnosed special needs (enrolled in Maine Care - Katie Beckett and Title V eligibility groups - and Child Development Services early intervention caseloads). Questions focused on child care utilization and work experiences in relation to children with special needs.
Researchers interested in information about the qualitative data should contact the Child Care and Children with Special Needs Project Web site.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27001.v1
child careicpsrchild healthicpsrchild welfareicpsrdevelopmentally disabledicpsrfamiliesicpsrmental disordersicpsrphysical disabilitiesicpsrspecial needs studentsicpsrICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsCCEERC I.C.1. Children with Special NeedsCCEERC I. Children and Child DevelopmentCCEERC I.C. Children with Special Needs and Special Child PopulationsICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderWard, Helen Morris, LisaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27001Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27001.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20520MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20520MiAaIMiAaI
Children of Immigrants Longitudinal Study (CILS), 1991-2006
[electronic resource]
Alejandro Portes
,
Rubén G. Rumbaut
2012-01-23Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR20520NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Children of Immigrants Longitudinal Study (CILS) was
designed to study the adaptation process of the immigrant second
generation which is defined broadly as United States-born children
with at least one foreign-born parent or children born abroad but
brought at an early age to the United States. The original survey was
conducted with large samples of second-generation immigrant children
attending the 8th and 9th grades in public and private schools in the
metropolitan areas of Miami/Ft. Lauderdale in Florida and San Diego,
California. Conducted in 1992, the first survey had the purpose of
ascertaining baseline information on immigrant families, children's
demographic characteristics, language use, self-identities, and
academic attainment. The total sample size was 5,262. Respondents came
from 77 different nationalities, although the sample reflects the most
sizable immigrant nationalities in each area. Three years later,
corresponding to the time in which respondents were about to graduate
from high school, the first follow-up survey was conducted. Its
purpose was to examine the evolution of key adaptation outcomes
including language knowledge and preference, ethnic identity,
self-esteem, and academic attainment over the adolescent years. The
survey also sought to establish the proportion of second-generation
youths who dropped out of school before graduation. This follow-up
survey retrieved 4,288 respondents or 81.5 percent of the original
sample. Together with this follow-up survey, a parental survey was
conducted. The purpose of this interview was to establish directly
characteristics of immigrant parents and families and their outlooks
for the future including aspirations and plans for the children. Since many immigrant parents did not understand English, this questionnaire was translated and administered in six different foreign languages. In
total, 2,442 parents or 46 percent of the original student sample were
interviewed. During 2001-2003, or a decade after the original survey,
a final follow-up was conducted. The sample now averaged 24 years of
age and, hence, patterns of adaptation in early adulthood could be
readily assessed. The original and follow-up surveys were conducted
mostly in schools attended by respondents, greatly facilitating access
to them. Most respondents had already left school by the time of the
second follow-up so they had to be contacted individually in their
place of work or residence. Respondents were located not only in the
San Diego and Miami areas, but also in more than 30 different states,
with some surveys returned from military bases overseas. Mailed
questionnaires were the principal source of completed data in this
third survey. In total, CILS-III retrieved complete or partial
information on 3,613 respondents representing 68.9 percent of the
original sample and 84.3 percent of the first follow-up.Relevant
adaptation outcomes measured in this survey include educational
attainment, employment and occupational status, income, civil status
and ethnicity of spouses/partners, political attitudes and
participation, ethnic and racial identities, delinquency and
incarceration, attitudes and levels of identification with American
society, and plans for the future.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20520.v2
career choiceicpsrcitizenshipicpsrcultural identityicpsrcultural traditionsicpsrcultural valuesicpsreducationicpsreducational environmenticpsremploymenticpsrethnic identityicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfamily historyicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfamily sizeicpsrfamily structureicpsrfriendshipsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrimmigrationicpsrimmigration statusicpsrincomeicpsrjob historyicpsrjob satisfactionicpsrneighborhood characteristicsicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsroccupational statusicpsrpersonal incomeicpsrpublic assistance programsicpsrself concepticpsrself esteemicpsrsocial networksicpsrsocial servicesicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrwelfare servicesicpsrDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthRCMD VIII. ImmigrationICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and YouthDSDR V. Migration and Population DistributionDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsRCMD XIII. Race and EthnicityICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsDSDR III. Health and MortalityICPSR XVII.A. Social Institutions and Behavior, Minorities and Race RelationsPortes, AlejandroRumbaut, Rubén G.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20520Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20520.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09836MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09836MiAaIMiAaI
Chinese Household Income Project, 1988
[electronic resource]
Keith Griffin
,
Zhao Renwei
2010-07-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR9836NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
n rents paid by the households, fuel available, type of
transportation used, and availability and use of medical and child
care.
The Chinese Household Income Project collected data in 1988, 1995, 2002, and 2007. ICPSR holds data from the first three collections, and information about these can be found on the series description page. Data collected in 2007 are available through the China Institute for Income Distribution.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09836.v2
demographic characteristicsicpsreducational backgroundicpsrelectric utilitiesicpsremployersicpsremploymenticpsrfarmsicpsrfinancial assetsicpsrfoodicpsrfood productionicpsrhome ownershipicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrhousing constructionicpsrincomeicpsrincome distributionicpsrinterest (finance)icpsrlivestockicpsrliving conditionsicpsrmedical careicpsroccupationsicpsrpensionsicpsrrental housingicpsrretirement incomeicpsrrural areasicpsrsanitationicpsrtaxesicpsrtransportationicpsrurban areasicpsrwages and salariesicpsragricultureicpsrcash paymentsicpsrchild careicpsrdebticpsrICPSR IV.B. Economic Behavior and Attitudes, Surveys of Economic Attitudes and BehaviorDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsGriffin, KeithRenwei, ZhaoInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9836Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09836.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03012MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03012MiAaIMiAaI
Chinese Household Income Project, 1995
[electronic resource]
Carl Riskin
,
Zhao Renwei
,
Li Shi
2010-07-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR3012NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
are.
The Chinese Household Income Project collected data in 1988, 1995, 2002, and 2007. ICPSR holds data from the first three collections, and information about these can be found on the series description page. Data collected in 2007 are available through the China Institute for Income Distribution.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03012.v2
economic conditionsicpsremploymenticpsrhousehold incomeicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousing conditionsicpsroccupationsicpsrrural areasicpsrurban areasicpsrDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR IV.B. Economic Behavior and Attitudes, Surveys of Economic Attitudes and BehaviorRiskin, CarlRenwei, ZhaoShi, LiInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3012Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03012.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21741MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21741MiAaIMiAaI
Chinese Household Income Project, 2002
[electronic resource]
Li Shi
2009-08-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR21741NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of this project was to measure and estimate the distribution of personal income and related economic factors in both rural and urban areas of the People's Republic of China. The principal investigators based their definition of income on cash payments and on a broad range of additional components. Data were collected through a series of questionnaire-based interviews conducted in rural and urban areas at the end of 2002.
There are ten separate datasets. The first four datasets were derived from the urban questionnaire. The first contains data about individuals living in urban areas. The second contains data about urban households. The third contains individual-level economic variables copied from the initial urban interview form. The fourth contains household-level economic variables copied from the initial urban interview form. The fifth dataset contains village-level data, which was obtained by interviewing village leaders. The sixth contains data about individuals living in rural areas. The seventh contains data about rural households, as well as most of the data from a social network questionnaire which was presented to rural households. The eighth contains the rest of the data from the social network questionnaire and is specifically about the activities of rural school-age children. The ninth dataset contains data about individuals who have migrated from rural to urban areas, and the tenth dataset contains data about rural-urban migrant households.
Dataset 1 contains 151 variables and 20,632 cases (individual urban household members). Dataset 2 contains 88 variables and 6,835 cases (urban households). Dataset 3 contains 44 variables and 27,818 cases, at least 6,835 of which are empty cases used to separate households in the file. The remaining cases from dataset 3 match those in dataset 1. Dataset 4 contains 212 variables and 6,835 cases, which match those in dataset 2. Dataset 5 contains 259 variables and 961 cases (villages). Dataset 6 contains 84 variables and 37,969 cases (individual rural household members). Dataset 7 contains 449 variables and 9,200 cases (rural households). Dataset 8 contains 38 variables and 8,121 cases (individual school-age children). Dataset 9 contains 76 variables and 5,327 cases (individual rural-urban migrant household members). Dataset 10 contains 129 variables and 2,000 cases (rural-urban migrant households).
The Chinese Household Income Project collected data in 1988, 1995, 2002, and 2007. ICPSR holds data from the first three collections, and information about these can be found on the series description page. Data collected in 2007 are available through the China Institute for Income Distribution.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21741.v1
agingicpsrCommunist Partyicpsrcommunity decision makingicpsrcommunity developmenticpsrcommunity leadersicpsrcommunity organizationsicpsrconsumptionicpsrcrop incomeicpsrcrop productionicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdisposable incomeicpsrdurable goodsicpsreconomic behavioricpsreducationicpsreducational backgroundicpsremploymenticpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily businessesicpsrfarm workersicpsrfarming communitiesicpsrfinancial assetsicpsrfood costsicpsrhealth care accessicpsrhealth care costsicpsrhousehold budgetsicpsrhousehold expendituresicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrlabor forceicpsrland ownershipicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrliving conditionsicpsrlocal governmenticpsrmigrant workersicpsrnondurable goodsicpsroccupational mobilityicpsrparentsicpsrpart-time employmenticpsrpensionsicpsrpopulation migrationicpsrretirementicpsrrural areasicpsrrural migrationicpsrsavingsicpsrschool attendanceicpsrsocial networksicpsrstandard of livingicpsrunemploymenticpsrurban areasicpsrurban migrationicpsrurban planningicpsrwelfare servicesicpsrworkersicpsrICPSR IV.C. Economic Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Economic Processes and IndicatorsICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsShi, LiInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21741Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21741.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27063MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27063MiAaIMiAaI
China Multi-Generational Panel Dataset, Liaoning (CMGPD-LN), 1749-1909
[electronic resource]
James Z. Lee
,
Cameron D. Campbell
2014-07-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR27063NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The China Multi-Generational Panel Dataset - Liaoning (CMGPD-LN) is drawn from the population registers compiled by the Imperial Household Agency (neiwufu) in Shengjing, currently the northeast Chinese province of Liaoning, between 1749 and 1909. It provides 1.5 million triennial observations of more than 260,000 residents from 698 communities. The population mainly consists of immigrants from North China who settled in rural Liaoning during the early eighteenth century, and their descendants. The data provide socioeconomic, demographic, and other characteristics for individuals, households, and communities, and record demographic outcomes such as marriage, fertility, and mortality. The data also record specific disabilities for a subset of adult males. Additionally, the collection includes monthly and annual grain price data, custom records for the city of Yingkou, as well as information regarding natural disasters, such as floods, droughts, and earthquakes. This dataset is unique among publicly available population databases because of its time span, volume, detail, and completeness of recording, and because it provides longitudinal data not just on individuals, but on their households, descent groups, and communities.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27063.v10
demographic characteristicsicpsrdisabilitiesicpsrdisastersicpsreighteenth centuryicpsrexportsicpsrfamily historyicpsrfamily structureicpsrgenerationsicpsrhistorical dataicpsrhouseholdsicpsrimmigrantsicpsrimportsicpsrmunicipalitiesicpsrnineteenth centuryicpsroccupational statusicpsrrural populationicpsragricultural productionicpsragricultureicpsrDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR V. Migration and Population DistributionCMGPD I. China Multi-Generational Panel DatasetICPSR I.B. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, Nations Other Than the United StatesIDRC V. Health DataDSDR III. Health and MortalityDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthLee, James Z.Campbell, Cameron D.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27063Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27063.v10 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35292MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35292MiAaIMiAaI
China Multi-Generational Panel Dataset, Shuangcheng (CMGPD-SC), 1866-1913
[electronic resource]
James Z. Lee
,
Shuang Chen
,
Cameron D. Campbell
,
Hongbo Wang
2015-02-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35292NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The China Multi-Generational Panel Dataset - Shuangcheng (CMGPD-SC) provides longitudinal individual, household, and community information on the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of a resettled population living in Shuangcheng, a county in present-day Heilongjiang Province of Northeastern China, for the period from 1866 to 1913. The dataset includes some 1.3 million annual observations of over 100,000 unique individuals descended from families who were relocated to Shuangcheng in the early 19th century. These families were divided into 3 categories based on their place of origin: metropolitan bannermen, rural bannermen, and floating bannermen. The CMGPD-SC, like its Liaoning counterpart, the CMGPD-LN (ICPSR 27063), is a valuable data source for studying longitudinal as well as multi-generational social and demographic processes. The population categories had salient differences in social origins and land entitlements, and landholding data are available at a number of time periods, thus the CMGPD-SC is especially suitable to the study of stratification processes.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35292.v3
agricultural productionicpsragricultureicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreighteenth centuryicpsrfamily historyicpsrfamily structureicpsrgenerationsicpsrhistorical dataicpsrhouseholdsicpsrimmigrantsicpsrland distributionicpsrnineteenth centuryicpsrrural populationicpsrDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesDSDR V. Migration and Population DistributionDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR III. Health and MortalityICPSR I.B. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, Nations Other Than the United StatesLee, James Z.Chen, ShuangCampbell, Cameron D.Wang, HongboInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35292Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35292.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04538MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04538MiAaIMiAaI
Chitwan Valley [Nepal] Family Study
[electronic resource]Changing Social Contexts and Family Formation
William G. Axinn
,
Arland Thornton
,
Jennifer S. Barber
,
Susan A. Murphy
,
Dirgha Ghimire
,
Thomas Fricke
,
Stephen Matthews
,
Dharma Dangol
,
Lisa Pearce
,
Ann Biddlecom
,
Sundar Shrehtha
,
Douglas Massey
2014-10-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4538NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The study was designed to investigate the influence of changing social contexts on family formation behaviors, marriage, childbearing, and contraceptive use. The research investigates the extent to which changes in the community produce changes in family formation behavior, and whether the family organization of individual life courses produces these changes in behavior. The study used a combination of ethnographic and survey research methods to gather 171 neighborhood histories, 142 school histories, 118 health service histories, 20 bus route histories, household farming practices, family planning histories, and household composition in Western Chitwan, Nepal. Personal histories were gathered from the 5,271 individuals ages 15-59 years living in these neighborhoods using a semi-structured Life History Calendar and a highly structured survey questionnaire. The sample neighborhoods for this study were chosen to represent the five major ethnic groups inhabiting the area: high caste Hindus, hill Tibeto-Burmese (such as Gurung, Tamang, and Magar), indigenous terai Tibeto-Burmese (such as Tharu, Darai, and Kumal), Newar, and other caste Hindus. Neighborhood history calendars measured the neighborhood's distance, in terms of minutes walking, to a variety of organizations and services. Schools were defined as places of instruction for children of any age or grade. Health clinics were defined as any places of care and healing, such as doctors' offices, hospitals, and health posts. Employers were any places that employed 10 or more people for pay. Cinemas were movie theaters or halls where movies were shown. Bus stops were any places where people could obtain a ride for pay on a vehicle.
This particular study spanned 1997-2002. These data were combined with data from the Chitwan Valley Family Study 1996-1997, and the Household Agriculture and Consumption Survey 1996.
** IMPORTANT NOTE FOR STATA USERS **
The Stata files for datasets 7, 15, 16, 18, and 32 were produced in Stata 13. Users of earlier versions of Stata will not be able to read them.
There are a few options for users of Stata 12 or earlier to work around the compatibility issue:
- Upgrade to Stata 13
- Find a computer with Stata 13 and use the 'saveold' command to create a Version 12 file
- Use the latest version of a file conversion utility, such as Stat/Transfer (older versions cannot read Stata 13 files)
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04538.v8
agricultureicpsrbirth controlicpsrchild rearingicpsrchildrenicpsrcommunitiesicpsrcommuting (travel)icpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily planningicpsrfamily structureicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmarriageicpsrneighborhood characteristicsicpsrneighborhoodsicpsrprenatal careicpsrsocial changeicpsrsocial environmenticpsrIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsIDRC V. Health DataICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR III. Health and MortalityICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthIDRC II. Economic DataAxinn, William G.Thornton, ArlandBarber, Jennifer S.Murphy, Susan A.Ghimire, DirghaFricke, ThomasMatthews, StephenDangol, DharmaPearce, LisaBiddlecom, AnnShrehtha, SundarMassey, DouglasInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4538Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04538.v8 nmm 22 4500ICPSR24400MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR24400MiAaIMiAaI
Consequences of Recent Parental Divorce for Young Adults, 1990-1992
[electronic resource]
Teresa M. Cooney
2010-03-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR24400NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This longitudinal study focused on examining the consequences of recent parental divorce for young adults (initially ages 18-23) whose parents had divorced within 15 months of the study's first wave (1990-91). The sample consisted of 257 White respondents with newly divorced parents and 228 White respondents who comprised an intact-family comparison group. A life course framework guided the study that focused heavily on young adult transition behaviors (entries and exits from home, work, school, cohabitation and marriage relationships, parenthood), family relationships (relationships with mother and father, siblings, grandparents), and well-being and adjustment (depression, coping). For respondents in the divorced-parents group, additional questions were asked about specific aspects of the divorce and their involvement in it. A follow-up telephone interview conducted two years later assessed life changes and subsequent adjustment over time for both groups of respondents. Specific questions addressed the sexual history of respondents and their most recent sexual partner, including the perceived risk of HIV/AIDS, history of sexual transmitted disease, the use of contraception, how much information they had shared with each other regarding their sexual attitudes and behaviors, and respondent's knowledge of the AIDS virus. Information was also collected on marital/cohabitation history, employment history, reproductive history, including the number and outcome of all pregnancies, physical and mental health, and tobacco, alcohol and drug use. Demographic variables include respondent's sex, age, occupation, employment status, marital/cohabitation status, number of children, current enrollment in school, past and present religious preferences, frequency of religious attendance, military service, and the number, sex, and age of siblings. Demographic information also includes the age, education level, employment status, and annual income of the respondent's parents, as well as the age, race, and education level of the respondent's most recent sexual partner.
For those respondents whose parents were recently divorced, demographic information was collected on each parent's current marital status and the age of their new spouse or partner.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24400.v1
academic achievementicpsrfamily lifeicpsrHIVicpsrlife eventsicpsrlife plansicpsrmarriageicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrparental attitudesicpsrreproductive historyicpsrsexual behavioricpsrstressicpsrbirth controlicpsryoung adultsicpsryouthsicpsrcareer planningicpsrdating (social)icpsrdivorceicpsrdrug abuseicpsreducationicpsreducational objectivesicpsremploymenticpsrDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramDATAPASS I. NDIIPPICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderCooney, Teresa M.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)24400Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24400.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR26543MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR26543MiAaIMiAaI
Familial Responses to Financial Instability, Doubling Up When Times Are Tough
[electronic resource]Obligations to Share a Home in Response to Economic Hardship, 2009 [United States]
National Center for Family and Marriage Research
,
Judith A. Seltzer
,
Suzanne M. Bianchi
2010-05-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR26543NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study focused on household living arrangements of parents and adult children during times of financial instability. A survey of over 3,000 adults aged 18 years and older from the general population was conducted by Knowledge Networks on behalf of the National Center for Family and Marriage Research. The survey was completed by 3,132 respondents out of 4,478 cases (69.9 percent response rate).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26543.v1
family sizeicpsrfamily structureicpsrhousehold budgetsicpsrhousehold expendituresicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrmarital statusicpsroccupational categoriesicpsroccupational statusicpsrpersonal financesicpsrDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsNational Center for Family and Marriage ResearchSeltzer, Judith A.Bianchi, Suzanne M.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)26543Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26543.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR26542MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR26542MiAaIMiAaI
Familial Responses to Financial Instability
[electronic resource]The Financial Management Behaviors Scale, 2009 [United States]
National Center for Family and Marriage Research
,
Jeffrey Dew
,
Jing Jian Xiao
2010-05-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR26542NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study focused on how financial difficulties may hinder or facilitate sound financial management. A survey of 1,000 adults aged 18 years and older from the general population was conducted by Knowledge Networks on behalf of the National Center for Family and Marriage Research. The survey was completed by 1,014 respondents out of 1,517 cases (66.8 percent response rate).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26542.v1
personal financesicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrmarital statusicpsroccupational categoriesicpsroccupational statusicpsrfamily sizeicpsrfamily structureicpsrhousehold budgetsicpsrhousehold expendituresicpsrDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderNational Center for Family and Marriage ResearchDew, JeffreyXiao, Jing JianInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)26542Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26542.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR26541MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR26541MiAaIMiAaI
Familial Responses to Financial Instability, How the Family Responds to Economic Pressure
[electronic resource]A Comparative Study, 2009 [United States]
National Center for Family and Marriage Research
,
Frank F. Furstenberg
,
Anne H. Gauthier
,
Shelley Pacholok
2010-05-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR26541NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study focused on how families respond to financial instability and economic pressure. A survey of over 1,000 adults aged 18 years and older who have a child younger than 18 years at home was conducted by Knowledge Networks on behalf of the National Center for Family and Marriage Research. The survey was completed by 1,169 respondents out of 1,855 cases (63 percent response rate). In addition to the main survey, respondents were also administered a one-question survey about insurance. Along with the survey variables from the main and the one-question surveys, Knowledge Networks' standard profile, and a series of data processing variables created by Knowledge Networks are included in the data file for the eligible cases (n = 1,169).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26541.v1
family sizeicpsrfamily structureicpsrhousehold budgetsicpsrhousehold expendituresicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrmarital statusicpsroccupational categoriesicpsroccupational statusicpsrpersonal financesicpsrDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United StatesNational Center for Family and Marriage ResearchFurstenberg, Frank F.Gauthier, Anne H.Pacholok, ShelleyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)26541Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26541.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR26544MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR26544MiAaIMiAaI
Familial Responses to Financial Instability, "It's All Your Fault"
[electronic resource]Predictors and Implications of Blame in Couples Under Economic Strain, 2009 [United States]
National Center for Family and Marriage Research
,
Lisa Diamond
,
Angela Hicks
2010-05-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR26544NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
On behalf of the National Center for Family and Marriage Research,
Knowledge Networks conducted a survey about financial management behaviors
among 600 opposite sex married or cohabiting couples. Both partners were
invited to participate in the survey at the same time. The data collection
began on August 18, 2009, and continued through August 24, 2009. A total of
2,495 panelists were invited to participate in the survey. Among the 1,595 (64
percent) who responded to the survey, 1,264 (51 percent) were eligible and
completed the questionnaire.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26544.v1
marital statusicpsroccupational categoriesicpsroccupational statusicpsrfamily sizeicpsrfamily structureicpsrhousehold budgetsicpsrhousehold expendituresicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrpersonal financesicpsrDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderNational Center for Family and Marriage ResearchDiamond, LisaHicks, AngelaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)26544Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26544.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35005MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35005MiAaIMiAaI
Families of Newtown, New York, 1642-1790
[electronic resource]
Jessica Kross
2014-03-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35005NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This dataset focuses on economic, social, and geographic mobility of town residents, and life events (marriage, birth and mortality). Church records supplemented with genealogies, wills, inventories, probate records, cemetery data, town books, court books, censuses, and tax lists were used to reconstitute families along the lines of previous French and English work (e.g. Fleury, M. and L. Henry,
Nouveau manuel de dépouillement et d'exploitation de l'état civil ancient
(1965) and Wrigley, E.A, "Family Reconstitution" in E.A. Wrigley, ed.
An Introduction to English Historical Demography
(1966). Family reconstitution is a method for studying demographic behavior in the absence of modern censuses and vital registration, providing for both observation of demographic events, as well as the population and time at risk. This dataset includes information about 202 couples and their 1094 children. The data on couples focus on demographic details for mothers and fathers, including birth, baptism, marriage and death dates, residence and religion. The data on children includes demographic information for the child, as well as marriage age and residence. Not all families have complete information.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35005.v1
birthicpsrchildrenicpsrdeathicpsrdemographyicpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily historiesicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfertilityicpsrmarriageicpsrparentsicpsrDSDR II. MortalityDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United StatesICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthKross, JessicaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35005Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35005.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31622MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31622MiAaIMiAaI
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study [Public Use Data]
[electronic resource]
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
,
Irwin Garfinkel
,
Sara S. McLanahan
,
Christina Paxson
2011-12-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR31622NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study follows a cohort of new parents and their children and provides previously unavailable information about the conditions and capabilities of new unwed parents and the well-being of their children. Mothers and fathers were interviewed in the hospital shortly after the birth of their children. The baseline questionnaires for mothers and fathers include information on (1) prenatal care, (2) mother-father relationships, (3) expectations about fathers' rights and responsibilities, (4) attitudes toward marriage, (5) parents' health, (6) social support and extended kin, (7) knowledge about local policies and community resources, and (8) education, employment, and income. Follow-up interviews gather additional information including (1) access to and use of healthcare and childcare services, (2) experiences with local welfare and child support agencies, (3) parental conflict and domestic violence, and (4) child health and well-being.
The first four waves of this study (1997-2003) have been archived and are available for download at ICPSR-DSDR. Nine-Year Follow Up (Wave 5) data can be found through the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study page on Princeton's website.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31622.v1
domestic responsibilitiesicpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfathersicpsrmarital statusicpsrmarriageicpsrparentsicpsrunwed mothersicpsrchild careicpsrchild healthicpsrchild rearingicpsrchild welfareicpsrchildrenicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesHMCA V. OtherDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityBrooks-Gunn, JeanneGarfinkel, IrwinMcLanahan, Sara S.Paxson, ChristinaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31622Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31622.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR28661MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR28661MiAaIMiAaI
Gansu Poverty and Education Project, Wave 1, 2000
[electronic resource]
Emily Hannum
,
Yanhong Zhang
2012-03-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR28661NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
China's dramatic economic and educational changes over the past 20 years have
stimulated concerns about the education of children in rural areas. Recent
empirical studies give evidence of growing disparities in educational
opportunities between urban and rural areas and socio-economic and geographic
inequities in basic-level educational participation within rural areas. These
studies also point to a persisting gender gap in enrollment and to the
disproportionate impact of poverty on girls' educational participation (Hannum
1998b; Zhang 1998).
This study focused on the influence of poverty on the schooling of 11
to 14 year-old children in rural Gansu, an interior province in Northwest China
characterized by high rates of rural poverty and a substantial dropout problem.
Substantively, this study was innovative in adopting an integrated
approach: it focused on the community, family, and school contexts in which
children are educated. Methodologically, the study combined
information on children's academic performance and school characteristics, with a
household-based sample that allowed examination of the academic experiences of
children who have left the education system as well as those who have persisted
in it. Finally, the project was the baseline wave for the
first large-scale, longitudinal study devoted to education and social inequality
conducted in rural China. Results of this study contribute to an understanding of basic social stratification processes and provide insights for developing intervention strategies to improve educational access and effectiveness in rural China.
Wave 1 of this study (2000) has been archived and is available for download at ICPSR-DSDR. For information about Waves 2-4 (2004, 2007, 2009), please see the Gansu Survey of Children and Families Web site.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28661.v1
communitiesicpsreconomic changeicpsreducation reformicpsreducational changeicpsreducational opportunitiesicpsreducationally disadvantagedicpsrfamilyicpsrgender rolesicpsrhouseholdsicpsrpovertyicpsrrural areasicpsrschoolsicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR II.A.2. Community and Urban Studies, Studies of Local Politics, Nations Other Than the United StatesICPSR V.B. Education, Nations Other Than the United StatesDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsHannum, EmilyZhang, YanhongInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)28661Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28661.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20000MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20000MiAaIMiAaI
Growth of American Families, 1955
[electronic resource]
Ronald Freedman
,
Arthur A. Campbell
,
Pascal K. Whelpton
2009-11-17Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR20000NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The 1955 Growth of American Families survey was the first in a series of surveys (later becoming the National Fertility Survey) that measured women's attitudes on various topics related to fertility and family planning. The sample was composed of 2,713 married women aged 18-39 living in the United States. The survey included the following main subjects: residence history, marital history, education, income, occupation and employment, religiosity, family background, attitude toward contraception, contraception use, pregnancies and births, fecundity, opinions on childbearing and rearing, and fertility expectations. Respondents were asked questions pertaining to their residence history, including if they owned or rented their home, and if they lived on a farm. A series of questions also dealt with the respondents' marital history, including when they first married and the month and year of subsequent marriages. Respondents were also asked to describe the level of education they had attained and that of their husbands. Respondents were also asked to give information with respect to income, both individual and household, and if their financial situation was better now compared to five years ago. Respondents were queried on their occupation, specifically on what exactly they did and in what kind of business. Similar questions were asked about their husbands' occupations. Also, they were asked what their reasons were for working. The survey sought information about the respondents' religious affiliation and with what frequency they attended church. Respondents were asked how many brothers and sisters they had as well as their attitude about the number of siblings in their household. Also included was a series of questions regarding the respondents' attitudes toward family planning. Respondents were asked if they and their husband thought it was acceptable for couples to use contraceptives to limit the size of their family. They were also queried about what specific methods of contraception they had used in the past, and after which pregnancy they started using a particular method. Respondents were asked whether they or their husband had had surgery to make them sterile and if there was any other reason to believe that they could not have children. Respondents were also asked if they thought raising a family was easier or harder now than when they were a child. Respondents were also asked what they believed was the ideal number of children for the average American family and what the ideal number of children would be, if at age 45, they could start their married life over. Other questions addressed how many children respondents expected to have before their family was completed and their reason for not wanting more or less than that number. Each respondent was also asked when she expected her next child.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20000.v2
abortionicpsrattitudesicpsrbirthicpsrbirth controlicpsreducationicpsrfamily planningicpsrfamily sizeicpsrfertilityicpsrincomeicpsrmarriageicpsrpopulation growthicpsrpregnancyicpsrreligious beliefsicpsrreproductive historyicpsrsexual behavioricpsrIFSS I. Integrated Fertility Survey SeriesICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthFreedman, RonaldCampbell, Arthur A.Whelpton, Pascal K.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20000Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20000.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20001MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20001MiAaIMiAaI
Growth of American Families, 1960
[electronic resource]
Pascal K. Whelpton
,
Arthur A. Campbell
,
John E. Patterson
2008-09-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR20001NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The 1960 Growth of American Families survey was the second in a series of two surveys that measured women's attitudes on various topics relating to fertility and family planning for 3,256 currently married White women aged 18-44 living in private households, previously married White women aged 23-44, who were married and living with their husband in 1960, and currently married non-White women aged 18-39, living with their husband. Main topics in the survey included residence history, marital history, education, employment and income, parent's characteristics, religiosity, siblings, attitude towards contraception, past use of contraceptives, fertility history, fecundity, attitudes and opinions on childbearing and rearing, desired family size, fertility intentions, and fertility expectations. Respondent's were asked to give detailed information pertaining to their residence history dating back to their birth. They were also asked if they ever lived on a farm. Respondents were also queried on their marital history, specifically, when their marriage(s) took place, ended, and how they ended. Respondents were asked to report their level of education, if they ever attended a school or college that belonged to a church or a religious group, and if so, what specific church or religious group. Respondents were also queried about their employment and income. Specifically, they were asked to report their own and their husband's occupation and industry. They were also queried on whether they worked between their pregnancies and if the work was part-time or full-time. They were asked to state their total family income and their husband's earnings. Characteristics of the respondent's parents were also asked for including nationality, occupation while respondent was growing up, and religious preference. Respondent's religiosity was also explored with questions about religious activities in their daily lives, as well as her own and her husband's religious preferences. Respondents were asked if they had attended Sunday school as a child and if their children currently attended Sunday school. Respondents were asked how many brothers and sisters they had while growing up as well as their attitude on the number of siblings in their household. Their attitude toward contraception was measured with questions that asked if it would be okay if couples did something to limit the number of pregnancies they had or to control the time when they get pregnant. They were also asked if they approved of couples using the rhythm method to keep from getting pregnant. They were also queried on what specific types of contraception they had used in the past and between pregnancies. Furthermore, they were asked if they ever used methods together. Fecundity was also explored with questions about whether they or their husband had had treatments or an operation that made them sterile. Respondents were also asked what they thought was the ideal number of children for the average American family. Desired family size was queried in a number of other ways including the number of children the respondent and her husband wanted before marriage, how many children the respondent wanted a year after the first child was born, and how many children the respondent expected in all.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20001.v1
educationicpsrfamily historyicpsrfamily planningicpsrfamily sizeicpsrfertilityicpsradoptionicpsrattitudesicpsrbirthicpsrbirth controlicpsrincomeicpsrjob historyicpsrmarriageicpsrpopulation growthicpsrpregnancyicpsrreligious beliefsicpsrreproductive historyicpsrsexual behavioricpsrIFSS I. Integrated Fertility Survey SeriesDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderWhelpton, Pascal K.Campbell, Arthur A.Patterson, John E.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20001Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20001.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34546MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34546MiAaIMiAaI
Hingham, Massachusetts Family Reconstructions, 1635-1880
[electronic resource]
Daniel Scott Smith
2014-05-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34546NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data are families in Hingham, Massachusetts, reconstituted by Daniel Scott Smith for his PhD dissertation from printed genealogies, vital, church and tax records, and censuses, along the lines of previous French and English work (e.g. Fleury, M. and L. Henry, Nouveau manuel de depouillement et d'exploitation de l'etat civil ancien (1965) and Wrigley, E.A, "Family Reconstitution," in E.A. Wrigley, ed. An Introduction to English Historical Demography (1966)). Family reconstitution is a method for studying demographic behavior in the absence of modern censuses and vital registration, providing for both observation of demographic events as well as the population and time at risk. In his dissertation, Population, Family and Society in Hingham, Massachusetts, 1635-1880 (University of California-Berkeley, 1973) Smith refers to the data as "statistical genealogy". The data were intended to be used to examine demographic patterns, family structure and social stratification in the past, and to generalize these patterns across the New England region. This dataset includes information on 1727 marriages. Variables include information about birth, death, marriage, fertility and wealth of husbands and wives, their parents and children. Naming practices are also represented in the data. There are no direct observations of children, but rather summary-type measures of characteristics of children and the couple's fertility history. A variable indicating the quality of the reconstitution is included. However, the meaning of the variable values has been lost.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34546.v1
demographyicpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfertilityicpsrmarriageicpsrmortality ratesicpsrparentsicpsrfamily historiesicpsrbirthicpsrchildrenicpsrDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR II. MortalityICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United StatesDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthSmith, Daniel ScottInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34546Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34546.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32404MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32404MiAaIMiAaI
Historical Demographic Data of Southeastern Europe
[electronic resource]Orasac, 1824-1975
Joel Halpern
2013-05-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR32404NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data in the Historical Demographic Data of Southeastern Europe series derive primarily from the ethnographic and archival research of Joel M. Halpern, Professor Emeritus of Anthropology at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, in southeastern Europe from 1953 to 2006. The series is comprised of historical demographic data from several towns and villages in the countries of Bosnia, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Slovenia, all of which are former constituent republics of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. The data provide insight into the shift from agricultural to industrial production, as well as the more general processes of urbanization occurring in the last days of the Yugoslav state. With an expansive timeframe ranging from 1818 to 2006, the series also contains a wide cross-section of demographic data types. These include, but are not limited to, population censuses, tax records, agricultural and landholding data, birth records, death records, marriage and engagement records, and migration information.
This component of the series focuses exclusively on the Serbian village of Orasac and is composed of 64 datasets. These data record a variety of demographic and economic information between the years of 1824 and 1975. General population information at the individual level is available in official census records from 1863, 1884, 1948, 1953, and 1961, and from population register records for the years of 1928, 1966, and 1975. Census data at the household level is also available for the years of 1863, 1928, 1948, 1953, and 1961. These data are followed by detailed records of engagement and marriage. Many of these data were obtained through the courtesy of village and county officials. Priest book records from 1851 through 1966, as well as death records from 1863 to 1976 and tombstone records from 1975, are also available. Information regarding migrants and emigrants was obtained from the village council for the years of 1946 through 1975. Lastly, the data provide economic and financial information, including records of individual landholdings (for the years of 1863, 1952, 1966, and 1975), records of government taxation at the individual or household level (for 1813 through 1840, as well as for 1952), and livestock censuses (at both the individual and household level for the years of 1824 and 1825, and only at the individual level for the years of 1833 and 1834).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32404.v1
agricultural censusicpsrbirth recordsicpsrcensus dataicpsrcensusesicpsrdeath recordsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdemographyicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfamily sizeicpsrgendericpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincome taxicpsrland ownershipicpsrlandownersicpsrlivestock inventoriesicpsrmarriageicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrpopulation migrationicpsrtax recordsicpsrvital statisticsicpsrDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR I.B. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, Nations Other Than the United StatesHalpern, JoelInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32404Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32404.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30302MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30302MiAaIMiAaI
Immigrant Second Generation in Metropolitan New York
[electronic resource]
John Mollenkopf
,
Philip Kasinitz
,
Mary Waters
2011-04-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR30302NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The study analyzes the forces leading to or impeding the assimilation of 18- to 32-year-olds from immigrant backgrounds that vary in terms of race, language, and the mix of skills and liabilities their parents brought to the United States. To make sure that what we find derives specifically from growing up in an immigrant family, rather than simply being a young person in New York, a comparison group of people from native born White, Black, and Puerto Rican backgrounds was also studied. The sample was drawn from New York City (except for Staten Island) and the surrounding counties in the inner part of the New York-New Jersey metropolitan region where the vast majority of immigrants and native born minority group members live and grow up.
The study groups make possible a number of interesting comparisons. Unlike many other immigrant groups, the West Indian first generation speaks English, but the dominant society racially classifies them as Black. The study explored how their experiences resemble or differ from native born African Americans. Dominicans and the Colombian-Peruvian-Ecuadoran population both speak Spanish, but live in different parts of New York, have different class backgrounds prior to immigration, and, quite often, different skin tones. The study compared them to Puerto Rican young people, who, along with their parents, have the benefit of citizenship. Chinese immigrants from the mainland tend to have little education, while young people with overseas Chinese parents come from families with higher incomes, more education, and more English fluency.
Respondents were divided into eight groups depending on their parents' origin. Those of immigrant ancestry include: Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union; Chinese immigrants from the mainland, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and the Chinese Diaspora; immigrants from the Dominican Republic; immigrants from the English-speaking countries of the West Indies (including Guyana but excluding Haiti and those of Indian origin); and immigrants from Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru. These groups composed 44 percent of the 2000 second-generation population in the defined sample area. For comparative purposes, Whites, Blacks, and Puerto Ricans who were born in the United States and whose parents were born in the United States or Puerto Rico were also interviewed. To be eligible, a respondent had to have a parent from one of these groups. If the respondent was eligible for two groups, he or she was asked which designation he or she preferred. The ability to compare these groups with native born
Whites, Blacks, and Puerto Ricans permits researchers to investigate the effects of nativity while controlling for race and language background.
About two-thirds of second-generation respondents were born in the United States, mostly in New York City, while one-third were born abroad but arrived in the United States by age 12 and had lived in the country for at least 10 years, except for those from the former Soviet Union, some of whom arrived past the age of 12. The project began with a pilot study in July 1996. Survey data collection took place between November 1999 and December 1999. The study includes demographic variables such as race, ethnicity, language, age, education, income, family size, country of origin, and citizenship status.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30302.v1
citizenshipicpsrcrimeicpsremploymenticpsrethnicityicpsrfamiliesicpsrgenealogyicpsrimmigrantsicpsrimmigrationicpsrlanguageicpsrneighborhoodsicpsrneighborsicpsrraceicpsrreligious denominationsicpsrurban crimeicpsrwork environmenticpsrICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR XVII.A. Social Institutions and Behavior, Minorities and Race RelationsDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR V. Migration and Population DistributionRCMD VIII. ImmigrationMollenkopf, JohnKasinitz, PhilipWaters, MaryInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30302Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30302.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22627MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22627MiAaIMiAaI
Immigration and Intergenerational Mobility in Metropolitan Los Angeles (IIMMLA), 2004
[electronic resource]
Rubén G. Rumbaut
,
Frank D. Bean
,
Leo R. Chávez
,
Jennifer Lee
,
Susan K. Brown
,
Louis DeSipio
,
Min Zhou
2008-07-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR22627NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
IIMMLA was supported by the Russell Sage Foundation. Since 1991, the Russell Sage Foundation has funded a program of research aimed at assessing how well the young adult offspring of recent immigrants are faring as they move through American schools and into the labor market. Two previous major studies have begun to tell us about the paths to incorporation of the children of contemporary immigrants: The Children of Immigrants Longitudinal Study (CILS), and the Immigrant Second Generation in New York study. The Immigration and Intergenerational Mobility in Metropolitan Los Angeles study is the third major initiative analyzing the progress of the new second generation in the United States. The Immigration and Intergenerational Mobility in Metropolitan Los Angeles (IIMMLA) study focused on young adult children of immigrants (1.5- and second-generation) in greater Los Angeles. IIMMLA investigated mobility among young adult (ages 20-39) children of immigrants in metropolitan Los Angeles and, in the case of the Mexican-origin population there, among young adult members of the third- or later generations. The five-county Los Angeles metropolitan area (Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside and San Bernardino counties) contains the largest concentrations of Mexicans, Salvadorans, Guatemalans, Filipinos, Chinese, Vietnamese, Koreans, and other nationalities in the United States. The diverse migration histories and modes of incorporation of these groups made the Los Angeles metropolitan area a strategic choice for a comparison study of the pathways of immigrant incorporation and mobility from one generation to the next. The IIMMLA study compared six foreign-born (1.5-generation) and foreign-parentage (second-generation) groups (Mexicans, Vietnamese, Filipinos, Koreans, Chinese, and Central Americans from Guatemala and El Salvador) with three native-born and native-parentage comparison groups (third- or later-generation Mexican Americans, and non-Hispanic Whites and Blacks). The targeted groups represent both the diversity of modes of incorporation in the United States and the range of occupational backgrounds and immigration status among contemporary immigrants (from professionals and entrepreneurs to laborers, refugees, and unauthorized migrants). The surveys provide basic demographic information as well as extensive data about socio-cultural orientation and mobility (e.g., language use, ethnic identity, religion, remittances, intermarriage, experiences of discrimination), economic mobility (e.g., parents' background, respondents' education, first and current job, wealth and income, encounters with the law), geographic mobility (childhood and present neighborhood of residence), and civic engagement and politics (political attitudes, voting behavior, as well as naturalization and transnational ties).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22627.v1
bilingualismicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfamily historyicpsrfamily sizeicpsrfamily structureicpsrgenerationsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrimmigrationicpsrimmigration statusicpsrincomeicpsrcitizenshipicpsrjob historyicpsrmarital statusicpsrneighborhood characteristicsicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsroccupational statusicpsrpersonal incomeicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical awarenessicpsrpublic assistance programsicpsrsocial servicesicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrcommunity participationicpsrcultural identityicpsreducationicpsreducational backgroundicpsremploymenticpsrethnic identityicpsrRCMD XIII. Race and EthnicityICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR V. Migration and Population DistributionDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and YouthRCMD VIII. ImmigrationRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsICPSR XVII.A. Social Institutions and Behavior, Minorities and Race RelationsRumbaut, Rubén G.Bean, Frank D.Chávez, Leo R.Lee, JenniferBrown, Susan K.DeSipio, LouisZhou, MinInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22627Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22627.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22626MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22626MiAaIMiAaI
India Human Development Survey (IHDS), 2005
[electronic resource]
Sonalde Desai
,
Reeve Vanneman
,
National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi
2013-06-17Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR22626NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The India Human Development Survey 2005 (IHDS) is a nationally representative, multi-topic survey of 41,554 households in 1,503 villages and 971 urban neighborhoods across India. Two one-hour interviews in each household covered topics concerning health, education, employment, economic status, marriage, fertility, gender relations, and social capital. Children aged 8-11 completed short reading, writing and arithmetic tests. Additional village, school, and medical facility interviews are also available.
The data that were collected in 2005 have been archived and are available for download at ICPSR-DSDR. A follow-up study, IHDS-II, was fielded in 2012, and the release of these data is expected in Spring of 2015.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22626.v8
disposable incomeicpsrchild careicpsrchild rearingicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrextended familiesicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfamily lifeicpsrfertilityicpsrgender rolesicpsrgender stereotypesicpsrhealthicpsrhouseworkicpsrhousingicpsrincomeicpsrmarital statusicpsrparentsicpsrsocial statusicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and YouthDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthCCEERC XIII.A. Single-Country StudiesDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsCCEERC XIII. International Child Care and Early EducationDesai, SonaldeVanneman, ReeveNational Council of Applied Economic Research, New DelhiInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22626Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22626.v8 nmm 22 4500ICPSR36151MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR36151MiAaIMiAaI
India Human Development Survey-II (IHDS-II), 2011-12
[electronic resource]
Sonalde Desai
,
Reeve Vanneman
2015-07-31Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR36151NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The India Human Development Survey-II (IHDS-II), 2011-12 is a nationally representative, multi-topic survey of 42,152 households in 1,503 villages and 971 urban neighborhoods across India. These data are mostly re-interviews of households interviewed for IHDS-I in 2004-05. Two one-hour interviews in each household covered topics concerning health, education, employment, economic status, marriage, fertility, gender relations, and social capital. Children aged 8-11 completed short reading, writing and arithmetic tests.
The IHDS-II data are assembled in three datasets:
Individual
Household
Eligible Women
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36151.v2
child rearingicpsreducationicpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily planningicpsrfertilityicpsrgender rolesicpsrhousehold expendituresicpsrincomeicpsrmarriageicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDesai, SonaldeVanneman, ReeveInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)36151Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36151.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21120MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21120MiAaIMiAaI
Japan 2000 National Survey on Family and Economic Conditions (NSFEC)
[electronic resource]
Noriko O. Tsuya
,
Minja K. Choe
,
Larry L. Bumpass
,
Ronald R. Rindfuss
2009-09-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR21120NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The 2000 National Survey on Family and Economic Conditions
(NSFEC) was collected by the Keio University Center of Excellence
(COE) program. It is a national, two-stage stratified probability
sample of Japanese men and women aged 20-49. The survey focused on
aspects of early life course such as educational objectives and
employment, as well as marriage, family life, child rearing, household
management, and gender roles.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21120.v1
fertilityicpsrgender rolesicpsrgender stereotypesicpsrgoalsicpsrhouseworkicpsrhousingicpsrincomeicpsrmarital statusicpsrparentsicpsrchild careicpsrchild rearingicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdisposable incomeicpsreducational objectivesicpsremploymenticpsrextended familiesicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfamily lifeicpsrDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and YouthDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderCCEERC II.D. Parent/Family Practices and StructureCCEERC II. Parents and FamiliesTsuya, Noriko O.Choe, Minja K.Bumpass, Larry L.Rindfuss, Ronald R.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21120Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21120.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34647MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34647MiAaIMiAaI
Japan 2009 National Survey on Family and Economic Conditions (NSFEC)
[electronic resource]
Minja Choe
,
Noriko Tsuya
,
Ronald Rindfuss
,
Larry Bumpass
2013-06-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34647NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Japan 2009 National Survey on Family and Economic Conditions (NSFEC) queries a targeted age cohort of Japanese adults on various facets of familial and economic life. The collection, assembled by the Keio University, features two components: (1) a new cross-sectional survey of 3,112 respondents from a nationally representative sample of Japanese men and women aged 20-49 years, and (2) a 2009 follow-up survey of 2,356 out of 4,482 original respondents from the Japan 2000 NSFEC. Respondents were asked questions regarding child rearing, household division of labor, gender roles, and educational background and employment of parents. Respondents were also probed for opinions on marriage, divorce, cohabitation, sexual activity outside of marriage, and children born out of wedlock. Demographic information includes age, sex, education, number of siblings, marital status, household income, home ownership, and number, age, and sex of children.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34647.v1
dating (social)icpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdivorceicpsrattitudesicpsrchild careicpsrchild rearingicpsrchildrenicpsrcohabiticpsrcommuting (travel)icpsrcookingicpsreducational objectivesicpsremploymenticpsrextended familiesicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfamily lifeicpsrfamily planningicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfertilityicpsrgender rolesicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrhouseworkicpsrhousingicpsrincomeicpsrmarital statusicpsrmarriageicpsrparentsicpsrpremarital sexicpsrpublic opinionicpsrshoppingicpsrsiblingsicpsrspousesicpsrunwed mothersicpsrworkicpsrworking hoursicpsrworking mothersicpsrDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderICPSR XVII.C.2. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, Nations Other Than the United StatesDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesChoe, MinjaTsuya, NorikoRindfuss, RonaldBumpass, LarryInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34647Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34647.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34347MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34347MiAaIMiAaI
Land Use, Agropastoral Production, Family Composition, and Household Economy in Santarem, Para, Brazil, June-August 2003
[electronic resource]
Emilio Moran
2013-04-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34347NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
ty of farming. These decisions then directly determine the entries into and exits from the household. This study investigated five basic questions: (1) Does the changing availability of household labor over the household life cycle affect the trajectory of deforestation and land use change in the same way for later generations of Amazonian farmers as for first generation in-migrants? (2) What are the determinants of changing household labor supply? Specifically, what are the biophysical and socioeconomic determinants of entries into and exits from the household through fertility, migration, and marriage? (3) How are the decisions of households regarding land use and labor allocation constrained by soil quality, access to water supplies, interannual drought events (e.g. El Nino type events), and other resource scarcities? (4) Are there notable differences in land use choices made by landholders who live in an urban area (away from the piece of land owned in the rural area) in contrast to the decisions made by those who live on their rural properties? (5) What are the bases for the precipitous decline in female fertility in these frontier regions, especially the use of sterilization after two pregnancies? Households will be surveyed in the Santarem region, in the Lower Tapajos Basin, Brazilian Amazon to collect detailed demographic, land-use histories, and economic data. The sampling of households for inclusion in the study will be based on a stratified random sample by period of occupation in Santarem, to capture intergenerational processes that preceded the availability of satellite images. Based on the particular combination of methodologies used in this investigation (traditional household surveys, satellite image analysis, and GIS, and the scaling up and down from households to landscape), future environmental changes were projected for the regional landscape under various scenarios of continued settlement, household life cycles, combinations of credit, and changing environmental conditions.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34347.v1
agricultural productivityicpsragricultureicpsrbirth controlicpsrcrop incomeicpsrcrop valueicpsrdeforestationicpsrfertilityicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrimmigrationicpsrland ownershipicpsrlivestockicpsrlivestock incomeicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrproperty valuesicpsrrural populationicpsrICPSR XVI. Social IndicatorsDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesMoran, EmilioInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34347Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34347.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20840MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20840MiAaIMiAaI
Malawi Longitudinal Study of Families and Health (MLSFH)
[electronic resource]
Jere R. Behrman
,
Agnes M. Chimbiri
,
Angela Chimwaza
,
Hans-Peter Kohler
,
Susan C. Watkins
2008-05-21Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR20840NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Malawi Longitudinal Study of Families and Health (MLSFH) [previous title: Malawi Diffusion and Ideational Change Project (MDICP)] is one of very few long- standing longitudinal cohort studies in a poor Sub-Saharan African (SSA) context. It provides a rare record of more than a decade of demographic, socioeconomic, and health conditions in one of the world's poorest countries. The MLSFH cohorts were selected to represent the rural population of Malawi, where the vast majority of Malawians live in conditions that are similar to those in the rural areas of other countries with high HIV prevalence: health conditions are poor, health facilities and schools are over-burdened and under-staffed, standards of living are low and nutritional needs of adults, children and the elderly are often not met. With 7 major data collection rounds between 1998 and 2012 for up to 4,000 individuals, as well as ancillary surveys and qualitative studies, the MLSFH has been a premier dataset for research on health, family dynamics, social networks, and HIV infection risks in a rural SSA context. Providing public-use data on the socioeconomic context, demographics and health of individuals and their families in Malawi over more than a decade, the MLSFH has been the basis of more than 150 publications and working papers submitted for publication. Importantly, the MLSFH has also informed health policy discussions in Malawi and elsewhere in SSA. The MLSFH/MDICP was originally developed as a sister project of the Kenya Diffusion and Ideational Change Project (KDICP), but with a larger sample and greater geographical dispersion. Both the KDICP and the MLSFH/MDICP aimed to examine the role of social interactions in changing demographic attitudes and behavior.
The first two waves of the MLSFH data collected in 1998 and 2001 are archived and available for download at ICPSR-DSDR. The first two waves focused on two key empirical questions: the roles of social interactions in (1) the acceptance (or rejection) of modern contraceptive methods and of smaller ideal family size and (2) the diffusion of knowledge of AIDS symptoms and transmission mechanisms and the evaluation of acceptable strategies of protection against AIDS.
More information and data for all waves of the MLSFH study can be found on the MLSFH project Web site. The MLSFH Data Web site contains instructions on how individuals can currently obtain the data (6 waves, 1998-2010). The MLSFH Cohort Profile is available as a University of Pennsylvania Population Studies Center (PSC) Working Paper. This cohort profile is the main documentation for the general study design, sampling framework, etc., and it summarizes some key findings as well.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20840.v1
AIDSicpsrbirth controlicpsrbirth expectationsicpsrcommunicable diseasesicpsrfamily planningicpsrfamily structureicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth statusicpsrHIVicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrhusbandsicpsrlivestockicpsrlivestock incomeicpsrmarital statusicpsrmarriageicpsrreligious affiliationicpsrremarriageicpsrreproductive historyicpsrsexual attitudesicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsocial lifeicpsrsocial networksicpsrspousesicpsrtraditional healersicpsrwivesicpsrDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR III. Health and MortalityICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and YouthDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesBehrman, Jere R.Chimbiri, Agnes M.Chimwaza, AngelaKohler, Hans-PeterWatkins, Susan C.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20840Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20840.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31322MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31322MiAaIMiAaI
Married and Cohabiting Couples, 2010 [United States]
[electronic resource]
National Center for Family and Marriage Research
2011-08-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR31322NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Knowledge Networks conducted a study on married and cohabiting couples' relationships with heterosexual couples 18-64 years of age. The data collection took place from July 26, 2010, to October 13, 2010. The main data collection was preceded by a small pretest to verify the data collection accuracy.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31322.v1
domestic partnershipicpsrdomestic relationsicpsrdomestic responsibilitiesicpsrfamily sizeicpsrfamily structureicpsrhealth expendituresicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrhousehold budgetsicpsrhousehold expendituresicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrmarital instabilityicpsrmarital relationsicpsrmarital satisfactionicpsrmarital statusicpsroccupational categoriesicpsroccupational statusicpsrpersonal financesicpsrstressicpsrDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsNational Center for Family and Marriage ResearchInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31322Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31322.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR24384MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR24384MiAaIMiAaI
National Couples Survey, 2005-2006
[electronic resource]
William R. Grady
,
John O.G. Billy
,
Daniel H. Klepinger
,
Lisa A. Cubbins
,
Koray Tanfer
2009-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR24384NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Data from the National Couples Study (NCS) were collected as part of two NIH-funded studies examining couples' contraceptive decision-making (but not consistency of use). Completed interviews were obtained from both partners of 413 married couples, 261 cohabiting couples and 335 dating non-cohabiting heterosexual couples (2,018 individuals), where the female was age 20 to 35 years and the male was age 18 or older. Other eligibility criteria were that the female was not currently pregnant, postpartum, or trying to get pregnant, and that both partners were neither medically nor surgically sterile (for whom consistency of contraceptive use is of limited interest). The survey used computer-assisted self interviewing (CASI) to collect data from an area probability sample of household residents in four cities and their adjacent county subdivisions: Baltimore, MD; Durham, NC; St. Louis, MO; and Seattle, WA. This survey obtained separate, parallel reports from both partners, providing unique and detailed data on the power relations, birth desires, method-related expectancies, values, perceptions, preferences, and behaviors of men and women making contraceptive and disease prevention choices within the context of an intimate heterosexual relationship.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24384.v1
birth controlicpsrfamily planningicpsrfertilityicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrincomeicpsrjob historyicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmarital relationsicpsrmarital statusicpsroccupational statusicpsrsexual behavioricpsrDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United StatesDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleGrady, William R.Billy, John O.G.Klepinger, Daniel H.Cubbins, Lisa A. Tanfer, KorayInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)24384Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24384.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21600MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21600MiAaIMiAaI
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), 1994-2008 [Public Use]
[electronic resource]
Kathleen Mullan Harris
,
J. Richard Udry
2014-05-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR21600NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), 1994-2008 [Public Use] is a longitudinal study of a nationally representative sample of adolescents in grades 7-12 in the United States during the 1994-1995 school year. The Add Health cohort has been followed into young adulthood with four in-home interviews, the most recent in 2008, when the sample was aged 24-32. Add Health combines longitudinal survey data on respondents' social, economic, psychological and physical well-being with contextual data on the family, neighborhood, community, school, friendships, peer groups, and romantic relationships, providing unique opportunities to study how social environments and behaviors in adolescence are linked to health and achievement outcomes in young adulthood.
Public use biomarker data has been added. The Glucose/HbA1c data file contains two measures of glucose homeostasis based on assays of the Wave IV dried blood spots: Glucose (mg/dl) and
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c, %). Six additional constructed measures -- fasting duration, classification of fasting glucose, classification of non-fasting glucose, classification of HbA1c, diabetes medication, and a joint classification of glucose, HbA1c, self-reported history of diabetes, and anti-diabetic medication use -- are also included.
Public use Lipids biomarker data has been added. The Lipids data file contains measures of triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total-cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, self-reported antihyperlipidemic medication use, joint classification of self-reported history of hyperlipidemia and antihyperlipidemic medication use, fasting duration.
For the most updated list of related publications please see the Add Health Publications Web site.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21600.v15
academic achievementicpsradolescentsicpsralcohol consumptionicpsrbiomarkersicpsrbirth controlicpsrclassroom environmenticpsrdating (social)icpsrdiabetesicpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug useicpsreating habitsicpsreducational environmenticpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily planningicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfamily structureicpsrfriendshipsicpsrhealthicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth care accessicpsrhealth statusicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrinterpersonal relationsicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmarriageicpsrneighborhood characteristicsicpsrneighborhoodsicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrschool attendanceicpsrself concepticpsrparental attitudesicpsrparental influenceicpsrphysical characteristicsicpsrphysical conditionicpsrphysical fitnessicpsrphysical limitationsicpsrpublic assistance programsicpsrreligious behavioricpsrreligious beliefsicpsrreproductive historyicpsrself esteemicpsrsexual attitudesicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsmokingicpsrsocial environmenticpsrsocial networksicpsrtobacco useicpsrviolenceicpsrwelfare servicesicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthDSDR III. Health and MortalityDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityFENWAY V. Same-Sex Families and CouplesFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and YouthHarris, Kathleen MullanUdry, J. RichardInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21600Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21600.v15 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22408MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22408MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey of Adolescents, 2004
[electronic resource]Burkina Faso
Christine Ouedraogo
,
Ann Biddlecom
,
Eliya Zulu
2008-07-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR22408NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey Adolescents was launched in 2004 in four Sub-Saharan African countries--Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, and Uganda--to provide detailed information on adolescent risk-taking and health-seeking behavior as related to HIV, STDs and unintended pregnancy. The study examined a range of factors (e.g., behavioral, sociocultural, economic) that could lead to increased vulnerability to risk. The study also encompassed knowledge of means of prevention, sources of trusted information and health care, and impediments to adolescents' abilities to apply their knowledge and take preventive action. The survey in Burkina Faso was administered between April and June 2004. Using a two-stage stratified sample design that selected households from rural and urban clusters, 5,400 households were listed for initial screening. After an initial interview in each household, individual surveys were administered in person to adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19 who were de facto or de jure members of the household. This process collected 6,489 individual interviews with adolescents. Because of the sensitive nature of questions administered in the survey, informed consent forms were obtained from both parents/guardians and the respondents, and in all possible instances interviewers and respondents were paired by gender.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22408.v1
risk assessmenticpsrsex educationicpsrsexual attitudesicpsrsexual awarenessicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsexual exploitationicpsrabortionicpsradolescentsicpsrAIDSicpsrbirthicpsrbirth controlicpsrdating (social)icpsrdomestic partnershipicpsreducationicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfamily planningicpsrfertilityicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth care facilitiesicpsrhealth educationicpsrhousehold appliancesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrmarriageicpsrreproductive historyicpsrsexual reproductionicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrteenage parentsicpsrteenage pregnanciesicpsrDSDR III. Health and MortalityICPSR XVII.C.2. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, Nations Other Than the United StatesDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesOuedraogo, ChristineBiddlecom, AnnZulu, EliyaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22408Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22408.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22409MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22409MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey of Adolescents, 2004
[electronic resource]Ghana
Kofi Awusabo-Asare
,
Ann Biddlecom
,
Eliya Zulu
2008-07-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR22409NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey Adolescents was launched in 2004 in four Sub-Saharan African countries--Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, and Uganda--to provide detailed information on adolescent risk-taking and health-seeking behavior as related to HIV, STDs and unintended pregnancy. The study examined a range of factors (e.g., behavioral, sociocultural, and economic) that could lead to increased vulnerability to risk. The study also encompassed knowledge of means of prevention, sources of trusted information and health care, and impediments to adolescentsi abilities to apply their knowledge and take preventive action. The Ghanian portion was administered between January and May 2004. Using a two-stage stratified sample design that selected households from rural and urban clusters, 9,445 households were listed for initial screening. After an initial interview in each household, individual surveys were administered in person to adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19 who were de facto or de jure members of the household. This process collected 4,430 individual interviews with adolescents. Because of the sensitive nature of questions administered in the survey, informed consent forms were obtained from both parents/guardians and the respondents, and in all possible instances interviewers and respondents were paired up by gender.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22409.v1
AIDSicpsrbirthicpsrbirth controlicpsrdating (social)icpsrdomestic partnershipicpsreducationicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfamily planningicpsrfertilityicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth care facilitiesicpsrabortionicpsradolescentsicpsrhealth educationicpsrhousehold appliancesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhuman behavioricpsrmarriageicpsrreproductive historyicpsrrisk assessmenticpsrsex educationicpsrsexual attitudesicpsrsexual awarenessicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsexual exploitationicpsrsexual reproductionicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrteenage parentsicpsrteenage pregnanciesicpsrICPSR XVII.C.2. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, Nations Other Than the United StatesICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthDSDR III. Health and MortalityICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderUCC I. University of Cape Coast Centre for Data Archiving, Management, Analysis and Advocacy (DAMAA)DSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsAwusabo-Asare, KofiBiddlecom, AnnZulu, EliyaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22409Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22409.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22410MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22410MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey of Adolescents, 2004
[electronic resource]Malawi
Alister Munthali
,
Ann Biddlecom
,
Eliya Zulu
2008-07-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR22410NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey Adolescents was launched in 2004 in four Sub-Saharan African countries--Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, and Uganda--to provide detailed information on adolescent risk-taking and health-seeking behavior as related to HIV, STDs and unintended pregnancy. The study examined a range of factors (e.g., behavioral, sociocultural, economic) that could lead to increased vulnerability to risk. The study also encompassed knowledge of means of prevention, sources of trusted information and health care, and impediments to adolescents' abilities to apply their knowledge and take preventive action. The survey in Malawi was administered between March and June 2004 and again in August 2004. Using a two-stage stratified sample design that selected households from rural and urban clusters, 7,750 households were listed for initial screening. After an initial interview in each household, individual surveys were administered in person to adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19 who were de facto or de jure members of the household. However, during the initial data collection period this process collected only 3,448 individual interviews with adolescents. Consequently, in August 2004, researchers extended the surveys to additional clusters excluded during the first round of surveys bringing the total number of individuals to 4,879. Because of the sensitive nature of questions administered in the survey, informed consent forms were obtained from both parents/guardians and the respondents, and in all possible instances interviewers and respondents were paired up by gender.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22410.v1
abortionicpsradolescentsicpsrAIDSicpsrbirthicpsrbirth controlicpsrdating (social)icpsrdomestic partnershipicpsreducationicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfamily planningicpsrfertilityicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth care facilitiesicpsrhealth educationicpsrhousehold appliancesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhuman behavioricpsrmarriageicpsrreproductive historyicpsrrisk assessmenticpsrsex educationicpsrsexual attitudesicpsrsexual awarenessicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsexual exploitationicpsrsexual reproductionicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrteenage parentsicpsrteenage pregnanciesicpsrDSDR III. Health and MortalityICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesICPSR XVII.C.2. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, Nations Other Than the United StatesDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderMunthali, AlisterBiddlecom, AnnZulu, EliyaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22410Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22410.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22411MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22411MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey of Adolescents, 2005
[electronic resource]Uganda
Stella Neema
,
Ann Biddlecom
,
Eliya Zulu
2008-07-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR22411NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey Adolescents was launched in 2004 in four Sub-Saharan African countries--Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, and Uganda--to provide detailed information on adolescent risk-taking and health-seeking behavior as related to HIV, STDs and unintended pregnancy. The study examined a range of factors (e.g., behavioral, sociocultural, economic) that could lead to increased vulnerability to risk. The study also encompassed knowledge of means of prevention, sources of trusted information and health care, and impediments to adolescentsi abilities to apply their knowledge and take preventive action. The Ugandan portion was administered between February and July 2004. Using a two-stage stratified sample design that selected households from rural and urban clusters, 7,106 households were listed for initial screening. After an initial interview in each household, individual surveys were administered in person to adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19 who were de facto or de jure members of the household. This process collected 6,659 individual interviews with adolescents. Because of the sensitive nature of questions administered in the survey, informed consent forms were obtained from both parents/guardians and the respondents, and in all possible instances interviewers and respondents were paired up by gender.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22411.v1
abortionicpsradolescentsicpsrAIDSicpsrbirthicpsrbirth controlicpsrdating (social)icpsrdomestic partnershipicpsreducationicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfamily planningicpsrfertilityicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth care facilitiesicpsrhealth educationicpsrhousehold appliancesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhuman behavioricpsrmarriageicpsrreproductive historyicpsrrisk assessmenticpsrsex educationicpsrsexual attitudesicpsrsexual awarenessicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsexual exploitationicpsrsexual reproductionicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrteenage parentsicpsrteenage pregnanciesicpsrDSDR III. Health and MortalityICPSR XVII.C.2. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, Nations Other Than the United StatesICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthNeema, StellaBiddlecom, AnnZulu, EliyaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22411Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22411.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06960MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1997 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06960MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle V, 1995
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics
2009-01-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1997ICPSR6960NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The NSFG Cycle V interviews have been divided into two files. The Respondent File (Part 1) contains one record for each woman in the survey, while the Interval File (Part 2) contains one record for each completed pregnancy experienced by a woman in the survey. An interval can be defined as one of the following: the time between a first intercourse at last contact (in 1988) and a pregnancy that ended after last contact, or the time between a pregnancy that ended before last contact and one that was in progress at the time of the interview. Part 1 offers data on respondents' marital histories, education, family background, sex education, births and pregnancies, first sexual intercourse, sterilizing operations, contraceptive histories, family planning services, infertility services, births -- intended and unexpected, adoption, sexually transmitted diseases/AIDS, religion, race/ethnicity, employment/occupation, income, and insurance. Part 2 supplies data on outcomes of pregnancies and other pregnancy-related information, use of birth control methods during intervals, and "wantedness" of pregnancies.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06960.v2
adoptionicpsrfertilityicpsrmarital statusicpsrpregnancyicpsrreproductive historyicpsrsex educationicpsrwomens health careicpsrAIDSicpsrbirthicpsrbirth controlicpsrbirth expectationsicpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfamily planningicpsrfamily sizeicpsrICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderIFSS I. Integrated Fertility Survey SeriesCCEERC II.E. Parent/Family CharacteristicsCCEERC II.D. Parent/Family Practices and StructureDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesCCEERC II. Parents and FamiliesDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6960Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06960.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30282MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30282MiAaIMiAaI
New Hope Project
[electronic resource]Income and Employment Effects on Children and Families, 1994-2003 [Restricted Use]
Aletha Huston
,
Cynthia Miller
,
Greg Duncan
,
Johannes M. Bos
,
Vonnie C. McLoyd
,
Thomas Weisner
,
Robert Granger
2013-04-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR30282NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The New Hope Project gathered information on respondents over eight years using several data sources. This collection consists of three datasets: (1) Adults, (2) Child and Family Study (CFS) Parents, and (3) Youth. Information was collected on respondent's employment history, job characteristics and security, other sources of income, feelings about respondent's financial situation, material hardship, respondent's access to health care, as well as experiences with the New Hope program. Furthermore, families with at least one child between the ages of 1 and 10 at initial random assignment were selected for the Child and Family Study (CFS). The CFS independently surveyed parents/primary caregivers and up to two focal children when applicable, and collected information about the parents' and the child's well-being. Additionally, teachers of school-aged children were mailed surveys and asked to rate the child's performance and behavior. Demographic variables include age, gender, race, nationality, citizenship, educational attainment, employment status, income, marital status, parent-child relations, and household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30282.v1
activities of daily livingicpsrafter school programsicpsraspirationsicpsrattitudesicpsrbullyingicpsrchild careicpsrchild healthicpsrchild rearingicpsrchildrenicpsreconomic aidicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreducationicpsreducational backgroundicpsremployee assistance programsicpsremploymenticpsremployment practicesicpsrgoalsicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth care accessicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrhousehold budgetsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold expendituresicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrhuman behavioricpsrincomeicpsrjob historyicpsrjob satisfactionicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrliving conditionsicpsrneighborhood characteristicsicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparentsicpsrparticipationicpsrperceptionsicpsrpovertyicpsrrecordsicpsrsocial behavioricpsrstandard of livingicpsrstressicpsrtax creditsicpsrtax recordsicpsrwelfare servicesicpsrwork attitudesicpsrICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesICPSR IV.B. Economic Behavior and Attitudes, Surveys of Economic Attitudes and BehaviorNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR II. Community and Urban StudiesDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsHuston, AlethaMiller, CynthiaDuncan, GregBos, Johannes M.McLoyd, Vonnie C.Weisner, ThomasGranger, RobertInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30282Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30282.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR28143MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR28143MiAaIMiAaI
Study of Family Life in Urban China, 1999
[electronic resource]
Yu Xie
,
Zhongdang Pan
2010-05-26Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR28143NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Study of Family Life in Urban China, also referred to simply as the "Three-City Survey," is a 1999 survey of urban residents in three large Chinese cities: Shanghai, Wuhan, and Xi'an. The study focused on the social and economic aspects of the family, particularly, the effects of economic reform on family life, cultural practices, and civic values.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28143.v1
citiesicpsrincomeicpsrleisureicpsrrecreationicpsrcognitive functioningicpsrcultural valuesicpsreconomic reformicpsreducational backgroundicpsremploymenticpsrfamilyicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfinancial supporticpsrICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsIDRC II. Economic DataDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsXie, YuPan, ZhongdangInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)28143Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28143.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34420MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34420MiAaIMiAaI
Supporting Healthy Marriage Evaluation
[electronic resource]Eight Sites within the United States, 2003-2013
JoAnn Hsueh
,
Virginia Knox
2014-12-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34420NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Supporting Healthy Marriage (SHM) evaluation was launched in 2003 to develop, to implement, and to test the effectiveness of a program aimed at strengthening low-income couples' marriages as one approach for supporting stable and nurturing family environments and parents' and children's well-being. The evaluation was led by MDRC and was sponsored by the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation in the Administration for Children and Families, United States Department of Health and Human Services.The SHM program was a voluntary yearlong marriage education program for low-income married couples who had children or were expecting a child. The program provided a series of group workshops based on structured curricula designed to enhance couples' relationships; supplemental activities to build on workshop themes; and family support services to address participation barriers, connect families with other services, and reinforce curricular themes.
The study sample consists of 6,298 couples (12,596 adult sample members) who were expecting a child or had a child under 18 years old at the time of study entry. The sample consists primarily of low-to-modest income, married couples with diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds. In each family, one child was randomly selected to be the focus of any child-related measures gathered in the data collection activities. These children ranged from pre-birth to 14 years old at the time of enrollment in the study. Follow-up interviews were conducted at 12 and 30 months after baseline data collection. More detail is provided in the study documentation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34420.v2
familiesicpsrfamily structureicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrchild developmenticpsrchild rearingicpsrchild welfareicpsrchildhoodicpsrchildrenicpsrdivorceicpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug useicpsremploymenticpsrhealth statusicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrlanguageicpsrmarriageicpsrmarriage counselingicpsroutcome evaluationicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparental influenceicpsrparenting skillsicpsrpoverty programsicpsrpregnancyicpsrsocial behavioricpsrwork experienceicpsrworking hoursicpsrDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderHsueh, JoAnnKnox, VirginiaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34420Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34420.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03843MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03843MiAaIMiAaI
Swedish Adoption/Twin Study on Aging (SATSA), 1984, 1987, 1990, 1993, 2004, 2007, and 2010
[electronic resource]
Nancy L. Pedersen
2015-05-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR3843NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Swedish Adoption/Twin Study on Aging (SATSA) was designed to study the origins of individual differences in aging and the environmental and genetic factors that are involved. SATSA began in 1984, and six additional waves were conducted in 1987, 1990, 1993, 2004, 2007, and 2010.
The questionnaire was initially sent to all twins from the Swedish Twin Registry who were separated at an early age and raised apart; the survey was also administered to a control sample of twins who were raised together. The respondents were surveyed on items that included health status, how they were raised, work environment, alcohol consumption, and dietary and smoking habits, as well as questions about personality and attitudes; this information comprised the first component.
The second component was collected from a subsample composed of 150 pairs of twins raised apart and 150 pairs of twins raised together. This subsample participated in seven waves of in-person testing, which included a health examination, structured interviews, and tests on functional capacity, cognitive abilities, and memory.
The data are represented according to questionnaire and time number, and correspond to each wave/year: Questionnaire 1 and In-Person Testing Time 1 were in 1984; Questionnaire 2 and In-Person Testing Time 2 were in 1987; Questionnaire 3 and In-Person Testing Time 3 were in 1990; Questionnaire 4 and In-Person Testing Time 4 were in 1993; Questionnaire 5 was in 2003; In-Person Testing Time 5 was in 2004; Questionnaire 6 and In-Person Testing Time 6 were in 2007; In-Person Testing Time 7 was in 2010. The Administrative and Cognitive datasets include data from all years/waves. The Smell Survey dataset only includes data from 1990. No years were specified for the Contact measures and Separation measures datasets.
Demographic and background information includes age, sex, education, family history, household composition and employment.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03843.v2
abilityicpsractivities of daily livingicpsradopted childrenicpsradoptionicpsragingicpsralcohol consumptionicpsrallergiesicpsranxietyicpsrassociationsicpsrattitudesicpsrcaregiversicpsrchronic disabilitiesicpsrchronic illnessesicpsrconflicticpsrcultural attitudesicpsrcultural traditionsicpsrdeathicpsrdeath of spouseicpsrdementiaicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdemographyicpsrdiabetesicpsrdieticpsrdisabilitiesicpsrdiseaseicpsreating habitsicpsreducationicpsrriskicpsrrisk assessmenticpsrrisk factorsicpsrsiblingsicpsrsmokingicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsreducational backgroundicpsremotional problemsicpsremploymenticpsrenvironmenticpsreveryday lifeicpsreyesighticpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily conflicticpsrfamily historiesicpsrfamily historyicpsrfamily lifeicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfamily structureicpsrfoodicpsrfriendshipsicpsrhealthicpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth statusicpsrhearing aidsicpsrhome careicpsrhome environmenticpsrhostilityicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseworkicpsrillnessicpsrinjuriesicpsrleisureicpsrlife eventsicpsrlifestylesicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrliving conditionsicpsrlong term careicpsrmanagementicpsrmedicineicpsrmemoryicpsrmental healthicpsrmiscarriagesicpsroccupationsicpsrolder adultsicpsropinionsicpsroptimismicpsrpainicpsrparentsicpsrpersonalityicpsrpessimismicpsrphysical appearanceicpsrphysical characteristicsicpsrphysical conditionicpsrphysical limitationsicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrpopulationsicpsrprescription drugsicpsrpsychological wellbeingicpsrrecreationicpsrrelativesicpsrretirementicpsrretirement planningicpsrretirement plansicpsrstillbirthsicpsrtesting and measurementicpsrtwinsicpsrworkicpsrwork attitudesicpsrwork environmenticpsrworkplacesicpsrDSDR IX. NIA Supported StudiesIDRC V. Health DataIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityDSDR III. Health and MortalityIDRC II. Economic DataNACDA IV. Psychological Characteristics, Mental Health, and Well-Being of Older AdultsPedersen, Nancy L.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3843Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03843.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29541MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29541MiAaIMiAaI
TAZAMA Health and Demographic Surveillance System, 1994-2012
[electronic resource]
John Changalucha
2014-11-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR29541NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The TAZAMA Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) study site is located in the Kisesa and Bukandwe rural electoral wards in the Magu district of the Mwanza Region in Northern Tanzania. The two wards are comprised of six villages. There is one health center and five dispensaries (3 public and 2 private) in the study area. The two wards have eleven government primary schools (at least one in each village) and two secondary schools. Both Mwanza city and Magu town are accessible to residents; buses run along the main road and take about an hour and a half to get to Mwanza. Most of the residents are subsistence farmers; a lot of surplus agricultural produce is traded in Mwanza, which is Tanzania's second city. In the year 2012, the research study covered a population of about 30,000 people who live in the Kisesa and Bukandwe wards. The majority of the residents (about ninety five per cent) belong to the Sukuma ethnic group.
The DSS collects information on births and deaths and movements in and out of the households. It helps researchers to understand the population dynamics in the study area including fertility, mortality and migration patterns. It provides information on the structure of families that live together. The DSS study is also used to identify people who are eligible to participate in the serological surveys (the right age group, and continuously resident rather than just visiting). It provides the data for calculating the denominators for demographic rates.
The objectives of this study are as follows: (1) to improve understanding of the dynamics of the HIV epidemic; (2) to assess the demographic, social and economic impacts of the HIV/AIDS epidemic; (3) to evaluate the effects of national prevention, treatment and care interventions as implemented in Kisesa Ward; (4) to measure child and adult mortality and fertility in the general population and by HIV status; (5) to asses the leading causes of death through verbal autopsy; (6) to assess changes in the family structure due to HIV epidemic; and (7) to provide reliable data for district health planning.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29541.v1
community healthicpsrdeathicpsrdemographic statisticsicpsrfemalesicpsrgendericpsrgeographic distributionicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth problemsicpsrHIVicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhuman behavioricpsrlife cycleicpsrmedical careicpsrAfrican studiesicpsraging populationicpsrAIDSicpsrbiographical dataicpsrbirthicpsrcauses of deathicpsrpopulation migrationicpsrDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesDSDR VII. Population Growth and DeclineDSDR V. Migration and Population DistributionDSDR III. Health and MortalityChangalucha, JohnInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29541Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29541.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04679MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04679MiAaIMiAaI
Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (TARS)
[electronic resource]Wave 1, 2001
Peggy C. Giordano
,
Monica A. Longmore
,
Wendy D. Manning
2011-09-26Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR4679NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study explores the relationship qualities and the
subjective meanings that motivate adolescent behavior. More
specifically, this study seeks to examine the nature and meaning of
adolescent relationship experiences (e.g., with family, peers, and
dating partners) in an effort to discover how experiences associated
with age, gender, race, and ethnicity influence the meaning of dating
relationships. The study further investigates the relative impact of
dating partners and peers on sexual behavior and contraceptive
practices, as well as involvement in other problem behaviors that can
contribute independently to sexual risk taking. The longitudinal
design of the Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (TARS) includes a
schedule of follow-up interviews occurring one, three, and five years
after the initial interview. Three waves of data have been collected
(2001, 2002, and 2004) and a fourth wave is scheduled for collection
(2006). Data were collected from adolescent respondents through
structured in-home interviews utilizing laptop computers. In-depth
interviews were conducted at the first wave with a subsample (n=100)
of the respondents. Parent data was collected via a short,
self-administered questionnaire at the first wave.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04679.v1
family relationshipsicpsrfamily structureicpsrfriendshipsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmarriageicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparental influenceicpsrneighborhoodsicpsrneighborhood characteristicsicpsrsexual attitudesicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsocial environmenticpsradolescentsicpsrbirth controlicpsrcontraceptionicpsrdating (social)icpsreducational environmenticpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily planningicpsrICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and YouthDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthGiordano, Peggy C.Longmore, Monica A.Manning, Wendy D.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4679Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04679.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32081MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32081MiAaIMiAaI
Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (TARS)
[electronic resource]Wave 2, 2002
Peggy C. Giordano
,
Monica A. Longmore
,
Wendy D. Manning
2011-10-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR32081NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study explores the relationship qualities and the
subjective meanings that motivate adolescent behavior. More
specifically, this study seeks to examine the nature and meaning of
adolescent relationship experiences (e.g., with family, peers, and
dating partners) in an effort to discover how experiences associated
with age, gender, race, and ethnicity influence the meaning of dating
relationships. The study further investigates the relative impact of
dating partners and peers on sexual behavior and contraceptive
practices, as well as involvement in other problem behaviors that can
contribute independently to sexual risk taking. The longitudinal
design of the Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (TARS) includes a
schedule of follow-up interviews occurring one, three, and five years
after the initial interview. Three waves of data have been collected
(2001, 2002, and 2004) and a fourth wave is scheduled for collection
(2006). Data were collected from adolescent respondents through
structured in-home interviews utilizing laptop computers. In-depth
interviews were conducted at the first wave with a subsample (n=100)
of the respondents. Parent data was collected via a short,
self-administered questionnaire at the first wave.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32081.v1
neighborhoodsicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparental influenceicpsrsexual attitudesicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsocial environmenticpsradolescentsicpsrbirth controlicpsrcontraceptionicpsrdating (social)icpsreducational environmenticpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily planningicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfamily structureicpsrfriendshipsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmarriageicpsrneighborhood characteristicsicpsrDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and YouthNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyGiordano, Peggy C.Longmore, Monica A.Manning, Wendy D.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32081Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32081.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33321MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33321MiAaIMiAaI
University of Washington - Beyond High School (UW-BHS)
[electronic resource]
Charles Hirschman
,
Gunnar Almgren
2015-01-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR33321NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The University of Washington - Beyond High School (UW-BHS) project surveyed students in Washington State to examine factors impacting educational attainment and the transition to adulthood among high school seniors. The project began in 1999 in an effort to assess the impact of I-200 (the referendum that ended Affirmative Action) on minority enrollment in higher education in Washington. The research objectives of the project were: (1) to describe and explain differences in the transition from high school to college by race and ethnicity, socioeconomic origins, and other characteristics, (2) to evaluate the impact of the Washington State Achievers Program, and (3) to explore the implications of multiple race and ethnic identities. Following a successful pilot survey in the spring of 2000, the project eventually included baseline and one-year follow-up surveys (conducted in 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005) of almost 10,000 high school seniors in five cohorts across several Washington school districts. The high school senior surveys included questions that explored students' educational aspirations and future career plans, as well as questions on family background, home life, perceptions of school and home environments, self-esteem, and participation in school related and non-school related activities. To supplement the 2000, 2002, and 2003 student surveys, parents of high school seniors were also queried to determine their expectations and aspirations for their child's education, as well as their own educational backgrounds and fields of employment. Parents were also asked to report any financial measures undertaken to prepare for their child's continued education, and whether the household received any form of financial assistance. In 2010, a ten-year follow-up with the 2000 senior cohort was conducted to assess educational, career, and familial outcomes. The ten year follow-up surveys collected information on educational attainment, early employment experiences, family and partnership, civic engagement, and health status. The baseline, parent, and follow-up surveys also collected detailed demographic information, including age, sex, ethnicity, language, religion, education level, employment, income, marital status, and parental status.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33321.v4
academic abilityicpsracademic achievementicpsreducationicpsreducational opportunitiesicpsrhigh school graduatesicpsrminoritiesicpsrparental influenceicpsrsocial inequalityicpsrstudent attitudesicpsrstudentsicpsrRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsICPSR V.A. Education, United StatesDSDR III. Health and MortalityDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsRCMD III. EducationDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsHirschman, CharlesAlmgren, GunnarInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33321Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33321.v4 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31101MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31101MiAaIMiAaI
Vietnam Life History Survey, 1991
[electronic resource]
Charles Hirschman
,
Tuong Lai
,
Pham Bich San
2011-08-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR31101NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The 1991 Vietnam Life History Survey is a cross-sectional study conducted to examine households and individuals in Vietnam. A 2-part survey was conducted, the first part focused on the respondents' household as the unit of analysis, information was collected for up to 15 respondents, although most households had only 4 to 6 respondents. The second part of the survey focused on individuals, the respondent's position in the household and their personal background. In the Individual dataset, observations were collected for up to 15 of the respondent's siblings. The 2 parts examined 4 samples of about 100 households, each stratified by region and urban/rural status in Vietnam with the household survey containing 403 household responses and the individual survey containing 921 respondents. Demographic variables in the Household dataset include region, household configuration, socioeconomic status, gender, ethnicity, appliance ownership, and house construction. Demographic variables in the Individual dataset include information on parents and siblings, familial occupations, ethnicity, sex, education, job history, marital status, and children information.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31101.v1
agricultural landicpsragricultural productionicpsragricultureicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreducationicpsrextended familiesicpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfamily historyicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfamily sizeicpsrfamily structureicpsrfathersicpsrhousehold appliancesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold expendituresicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrintergenerational relationsicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrliving conditionsicpsrmarital statusicpsrpopulationsicpsrrelativesicpsrDSDR V. Migration and Population DistributionICPSR II. Community and Urban StudiesDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR V.B. Education, Nations Other Than the United StatesHirschman, CharlesLai, TuongBich San, PhamInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31101Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31101.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33506MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33506MiAaIMiAaI
Vietnam Longitudinal Survey, 1995-1998
[electronic resource]
Charles Hirschman
,
Tuong Lai
,
Pham Bich San
2015-07-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR33506NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Vietnam Longitudinal Survey, 1995-1998 (VLS) sought to analyze the impact of changing household economies on demographic phenomena such as marriage, pregnancy, and family composition in Vietnam. The VLS was the first longitudinal sociological survey and one of the largest sociological surveys ever conducted in Vietnam. The study was part of a long-term collaborative research program between the Institute of Sociology (IOS), Hanoi - Vietnam, and Professor Charles Hirschman from the University of Washington-Seattle.
The VLS emerged as the result of extensive exchange between IOS researchers and Charles Hirschman following their first collaborative project, the
Vietnam Life History Survey (VLHS)
, which was conducted in 1991 (ICPSR 31101). During the 1994-95 academic year, Hirschman and IOS jointly developed a detailed plan for the VLS based on their previous experiences from the
VLHS
. Ten communes in the provinces of Nam Ha and Ninh Binh were selected for the VLS survey using probability sampling methods. In July 1995, the pretest survey was carried out in the Dai Xuyen commune approximately 40km south of Hanoi. Baseline interviews were conducted from September to November of 1995, with 1,855 households and 4,464 individuals surveyed for the first round. The second round of interviewing was carried out from August to September of 1996, with 1,820 households and 4,340 individuals successfully re-interviewed. The third round was carried out in July and August of 1997, with 1811 households and 4309 individuals re-interviewed. The fourth and final round of the survey was conducted in July and August of 1998, with a final household count of 1,795 and 4,222 individual respondents.
Data were collected at the individual and household level for each survey year. Household-level variables measured several household attributes, including size of land and living space, house construction materials, number of rooms and amenities, ownership of appliances, vehicles, and livestock, types and amount of agricultural production. Individual-level variables measured traditional courtship and wedding customs, familial marriage negotiations, marital history, pregnancy and birth history, as well as experiences with abstinence, various contraceptive methods, abortion, pregnancy, and breastfeeding. Household-level demographic variables provide information on household composition, including number of members, age, sex, ethnicity, education level, marital status, and occupation of each household member, as well as total household income. Individual-level demographic variables include age, sex, ethnicity, religion, education level, occupation, job history, income, marital status, and information on children of respondents.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33506.v1
abortionicpsragricultural productionicpsreducationicpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily planningicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrlabor (work)icpsrmarriageicpsrpregnancyicpsrICPSR II. Community and Urban StudiesICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthHirschman, CharlesLai, TuongBich San, PhamInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33506Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33506.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04701MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04701MiAaIMiAaI
Welfare, Children, and Families
[electronic resource]A Three-City Study
Ronald Angel
,
Linda Burton
,
P. Lindsay Chase-Lansdale
,
Andrew Cherlin
,
Robert Moffitt
2012-10-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4701NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection is the third wave of an intensive study in Boston, Chicago, and San Antonio, which was initiated to assess the well-being of low-income children and families in the post-welfare reform era. The project investigates the strategies families have used to respond to reform, in terms of employment, schooling or other forms of training, residential mobility, and fertility. Central to this project is a focus on how these strategies affect children's lives, with an emphasis on their health and development as well as their need for, and use of, social services. For the first wave of the study, between March 1999 and December 1999, a random sample of approximately 2,400 households with children in low-income neighborhoods in Boston, Chicago, and San Antonio were selected for interviews. Forty percent of the families interviewed were receiving cash welfare payments at the time of the interview. Each household had a child aged 0 to 4 or aged 10 to 14 at the time of the interview. The child and the child's primary female caregiver are the focus of the study. Extensive baseline information was gathered at the initial personal interview with the caregivers, tested younger children were assessed, and older children were interviewed. All interviews were conducted in-person using a computerized instrument. The third wave of data collection took place between February 2005 and January 2006, when the focal children were aged 5 to 10 or aged 15 to 20. Between May 2005 and May 2006, interviews were conducted with the teachers of the focal children.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04701.v7
self concepticpsrself esteemicpsrdomestic violenceicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfamily sizeicpsrfamily structureicpsrfathersicpsrhealthicpsrhealth statusicpsrhome environmenticpsrhousingicpsrincomeicpsrjob historyicpsrmothersicpsreducationicpsrfamily backgroundicpsradolescentsicpsrchild developmenticpsrchild rearingicpsrchild supporticpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrneighborhood characteristicsicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsroccupational categoriesicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrparental attitudesicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsingle mothersicpsrsocial networksicpsrwelfare servicesicpsrphysical characteristicsicpsrpregnancyicpsrschoolsicpsrDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsCCEERC XII. Parent, School, and Community School Readiness/Child School Success and PerformanceDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderCCEERC II. Parents and FamiliesDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthCCEERC I. Children and Child DevelopmentDSDR III. Health and MortalityCCEERC I.B. Child Development and School ReadinessDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesCCEERC II.D. Parent/Family Practices and StructureICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and YouthAngel, RonaldBurton, LindaChase-Lansdale, P. LindsayCherlin, AndrewMoffitt, RobertInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4701Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04701.v7 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31582MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31582MiAaIMiAaI
West Malaysian Family Survey, 1966-1967
[electronic resource]
Charles Hirschman
,
James Palmore
2012-01-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR31582NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Family Survey was a national (contemporary Peninsular Malaysia) probability sample survey consisting of an initial household screening interview followed by an intensive interview of all currently married women, aged 15 to 45, living in the screened households. The primary objective of the survey was to gather baseline data on fertility and on family planning knowledge, attitudes, and practices. The survey was conducted by the Malaysian Department of Statistics for the National Family Planning Board of Malaysia. Technical assistance was provided by the staff of the Population Studies Center of the University of Michigan.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31582.v1
family sizeicpsrfamily structureicpsrfertilityicpsrfertility ratesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrinfantsicpsrlive birthsicpsrmiscarriagesicpsrbirthicpsrbirth controlicpsrbirth expectationsicpsrbirth ratesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdemographic fluctuationsicpsrdemographyicpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily planningicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparental influenceicpsrparenting skillsicpsrparentsicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrpopulation decreaseicpsrpopulation densityicpsrpopulation estimatesicpsrpopulation growthicpsrpopulation growth rateicpsrpopulation planningicpsrpopulation policyicpsrpopulation projectionsicpsrpopulation sizeicpsrpregnancyicpsrreproductive historyicpsrsexual reproductionicpsrsingle mothersicpsrsingle parent familiesicpsrsingle parentsicpsrvital statisticsicpsrDSDR VII. Population Growth and DeclineICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital StatisticsDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthHirschman, CharlesPalmore, JamesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31582Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31582.v1