ESA, the prestigious European Space Agency which is the equivalent of NASA, has confirmed what has long been rumored: Mars’ moon Phobos is hollow
but also, it is likely artificial! Here it is: Proof of intelligent life beyond Earth!
The ESA study which has appeared in Geophysical Research Letters states that Phobos is not a captured asteroid; this old explanation for Phobos’
many anomalies was accepted by science for many years.

“We report independent results from two subgroups of the Mars Express Radio Science (MaRS) team who independently analyzed Mars Express (MEX) radio
tracking data for the purpose of determining consistently the gravitational attraction of the moon Phobos on the MEX spacecraft, and hence the mass of
Phobos. New values for the gravitational parameter (GM=0.7127 ± 0.0021 x 10-³ km³/s²) and density of Phobos (1876 ± 20 kg/m³) provide meaningful
new constraints on the corresponding range of the body’s porosity (30% ± 5%), provide a basis for improved interpretation of the internal
structure. We conclude that the interior of Phobos likely contains large voids. When applied to various hypotheses bearing on the origin of Phobos,
these results are inconsistent with the proposition that Phobos is a captured asteroid,” states the ESA report.
The official ESA Phobos website offers explicit scientific data from multiple perspectives, which strongly support the idea that this is what radar
echoes would look like, coming back from inside an enormous geometric spaceship. Phobos has an internal, 3-D geometric radar signature. The
concurrence of all three of these independent Mars Express experiments, imaging, internal mass distribution, (tracking) and internal radar imaging,
now agree that “the interior of Phobos’ is partially hollow with internal, geometric ‘voids’ inside it.” Geometric? Phobos is not
natural!

Would be interesting indeed if this can be confirmed as genuine. Where is the direct link to this alleged ESA announcement? I see no primary source
confirmation here. www.esa.int...
At least on its own website, the ESA does not seem to indicate these findings. No mention of being hollow or artificial.

Originally posted by SELAboy
Would be interesting indeed if this can be confirmed as genuine. Where is the direct link to this alleged ESA announcement? I see no primary source
confirmation here. www.esa.int...
At least on its own website, the ESA does not seem to indicate these findings. No mention of being hollow or artificial.

Ah,but that is because the story is a few years old with a little spin to it.

4 March 2010 Mars Express encountered Phobos last night, smoothly skimming past at just 67 km, the closest any manmade object has ever approached
Mars’ enigmatic moon.
The data collected could help unlock the origin of not just Phobos but other ‘second generation’ moons. Something is not right about Phobos.
It looks like a solid object but previous flybys have shown that it is not dense enough to be solid all the way through. Instead, it must be 25-35%
porous. This has led planetary scientists to believe that it is little more than a ‘rubble pile’ circling Mars. Such a rubble pile would be
composed of blocks both large and small resting together, with possibly large spaces between them where they do not fit easily together.

Well its been said that our own moon is hollow and also artificial.
I hear there are stories of the time "before the moon".
A time when we were not under the control of the moon.

The tides, in our bodies and in our environment have been enslaved every since its arrival.

Mars is where life "used to be". Now it's Earth.
TPTB brought in the Martian satellite to control the life on Mars just as they are doing today on Earth through the creation and the placement of the
Moon.

I bet we find these "pods" all over the universe on dead and currently living planets.

Personally, I think it's the Reptilians, but I wouldn't put it past the Insectoids from Omega 8.
It's hard to keep up with all that's going on out there these days.

Originally posted by SELAboy
Would be interesting indeed if this can be confirmed as genuine. Where is the direct link to this alleged ESA announcement? I see no primary source
confirmation here. www.esa.int...
At least on its own website, the ESA does not seem to indicate these findings. No mention of being hollow or artificial.

Yeah -- but confirm "what" as being genuine? -- That Phobos could contain voids and have a geometric structure (which is what ufodigest says the ESA
report states)?

Even if the ESA report states those things, that doesn't mean Phobos is hollow and artificial. It simply means Phobos could have voids (which doesn't
necessarily equate to "hollow") and a geometric structure -- both of which could be very natural.

edit on 12/11/2012 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)

Phobos was calculated to be 30% ± 5%, or a quarter to a third of the moon being hollow. This void space is mostly on small scales (millimeters to
~1-m), between individual grains and boulders. Source What about the pumice?
en.wikipedia.org...

Originally posted by TheLieWeLive
Has the lines on Phobos that go across the surface, and even through craters, ever been explained?

edit on 11-12-2012 by TheLieWeLive because: (no reason given)

I don't know,but if it's a bunch loose rocks lumped together covered in loose dirt,the pull and tug on it could create fractures where that loose
dirt falls into.
Like cracking and egg.
Didn't they have that same question about vesta and it's gullies?

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.