Haven't read the whole thread but I imagine people have mentioned the JFK assassination.

In my personal opinion as someone who has worked in the military and has a pretty good knowledge of whats possible or not when it comes to shooting (plus from talking to people who are basically experts), Lee Harvey Oswald COULD have made the shot. And it wouldn't have to be a fluke either, I'd say that shot would've had around a 40/60 success rate, so I can perfectly well believe he was the assassin.

Other than that, I don't know enough about that situation, but I do feel conspiracy theorists make too much of the shot difficulty there, it was definitely a make-able kill for me.

"My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable, and I'm just ferocious"

- NWO aka The Committee of 300 (300 richest families in the world) run the world
- 911 the start of WW3 just look at the middle east since 911
- The Collapse of the Dollar of will come and I'm not ready for it- Jesus Christ the son of Julius Cesear & Cleopatra

When it comes to conspiracy theories in general, particularly ones about controlling the world etc, for me a lot of it is really people either wanting humanity to be more powerful/capable that it appears (which is rash, foolhardy, bungling and inept), or for there to be some kind of higher power controlling things. People don't like the idea of simple chaos, they want there to be some overarching control over things, it makes them feel better (and more significant).

The truth is humanity is too inept to accomplish widespread control of anything. Individuals are capable of great deeds, but secrecy is almost impossible, particularly in the modern world. Most of our world leaders, and the wealthy corporation owners are in fact normal, average people who accomplished these things through pure chance as well as skill. They aren't particularly special, and for the most part they don't have an agenda other than helping themselves (just like the rest of us).

"My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable, and I'm just ferocious"

Not to mention, too many variables. basic laws of statistics say the more variables, the more likely things are to get fucked up

There are people who rule the world, but its not exactly a secret or hard to figure out who they are

Yeah, and those who do 'rule' the world (questionable really, defining true power and arguing that single individuals have it is difficult) are not superhumans or aliens, they are normal, average people. Usually.

"My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable, and I'm just ferocious"

Haven't read the whole thread but I imagine people have mentioned the JFK assassination.

In my personal opinion as someone who has worked in the military and has a pretty good knowledge of whats possible or not when it comes to shooting (plus from talking to people who are basically experts), Lee Harvey Oswald COULD have made the shot. And it wouldn't have to be a fluke either, I'd say that shot would've had around a 40/60 success rate, so I can perfectly well believe he was the assassin.

Other than that, I don't know enough about that situation, but I do feel conspiracy theorists make too much of the shot difficulty there, it was definitely a make-able kill for me.

That's not really what's shady about the whole ordeal. The Warren Commission is far more controversial, but that could just be gross incompetence rather than a cover up. If it is incompetence, a conspiracy is still possible of course.

That's not really what's shady about the whole ordeal. The Warren Commission is far more controversial, but that could just be gross incompetence rather than a cover up. If it is incompetence, a conspiracy is still possible of course.

Yeah for sure, I don't know enough about the rest to comment. Their may well have been something strange going on there, my knowledge of that situation only goes as far as the shooting logistics, in that respect Oswald could have been the killer.

"My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable, and I'm just ferocious"