The guns used in the fatal shooting at an Ionia car wash were a .22 Magnum carried by Robert Taylor and a 9mm carried by James Pullum, Ionia Department of Public Safety Director Troy Thomas said.The IDPS is continuing its investigation into why the 43-year-old Pullum and 56-year-old Taylor exchanged gunfire at Wonder Wand Auto Wash on Steele Street around 7 p.m. Sept. 18 after a confrontation. Both men died.Police said Pullum and Taylor each had valid licenses to carry concealed weapons (CCW) at the time of the shooting.Teri Pullum, James Pullum's wife, who was in his car with his mother at the time of the incident, can be heard during a call to 911 telling an unidentified person near the car wash that "road rage" led to the shooting.Thomas said he is waiting for a report from the Michigan State Police crime lab to determine how many shots were fired by each of the men and possibly who shot first from crime scene reconstruction, as well as the autopsy and toxicology reports.Ionia County Prosecutor Ron Schafer said when all the reports are completed and compiled, his office could receive copies from the IDPS for a "courtesy review," but otherwise his office will not have a role in the investigation."We don't get into any determination about whether there was an aggressor or analysis of violation of any criminal code," said Schafer.Schafer addressed recent media reports that Taylor had had his CCW license revoked in November 2006 for three years following a conviction for operating while intoxicated (OWI), as required by state law – implying that Taylor should not have been given a new CCW license."He was not eligible for three years, and he didn't even submit a new application until November 2010," Schafer said. "He waited a year longer than required, at which time the only conviction on his criminal history was the (OWI) in 2006. As such, the gun board was required to give him a permit."At the time Taylor was charged with the OWI, he had his gun in his vehicle, and he had a valid CCW license, Schafer said."In 2006, and the same is true today, our chief concern is prohibiting and preventing a repeat of drinking and driving," Schafer said. "The gun had nothing to do with the drunk driving arrest. He was entitled to have (the gun). We made him plead to the (OWI) charge to prevent anyone in the community from getting hurt. If there had been an allegation of misuse of the gun, we would have taken more action."At the time of Taylor's arrest, there was no so-called "Super Drunk" law in Michigan requiring stiffer penalties, and Schafer's office could have reduced Taylor's OWI to a lesser charge of operating while impaired."We did not, and we still don't do that," Schafer said. "His other gun charge (for carrying the gun in his vehicle when he had consumed alcohol) was dismissed. It was also a 90-day misdemeanor, not a separate higher crime."Had Schafer's office prosecuted Taylor on the gun charge, he could have lost his license permanently. At the time of his arrest, Taylor was 49."In his entire life he had no brushes with the law. Your chief concern then is preventing him from killing someone from drinking and driving," said Schafer. "He completed his probation, which is exactly what we wanted to happen. He had no more brushes with the law, and certainly no more drunk driving."Drunk driving is still by far more of a problem in society, with drunk drivers killing people every day," Schafer said.Follow Karen Bota on Twittter @KarenB_ISS.