Anderson, W.E. (1983). The Rape of the Eye: A Psychoanalytic Reading of The Aspern Papers. Psychoanal. Rev., 70:101-119.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:

Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

That was what the old woman represented—esoteric knowledge; and that was the idea with which my editorial heart used to thrill. The Aspern Papers, Section IV (James, 1888).

Perhaps the most recurrent kind of significant event in The Aspern Papers is the nameless narrator's concern over seeing or being seen as he indiscreetly looks, intensely stares, or grotesquely gapes at Miss Bordereau, her house, her furniture, or the doors and shutters which secrete her. His fixed gaze becomes so exaggerated a feature in the story that it betrays a voyeuristic instinct. Consequently, much may be gained by viewing the narrator's actions and thoughts as motivated not simply by the editorial passion he expresses. Yet even his scholarly interest in Aspern's life and letters fits with clinical observations on voyeurism, for, as Otto Fenichel (1945) explains, “Knowing sexual facts' may … become displaced and give rise to … continual asking of questions. … It may also become sublimated into a real interest in research” (p. 72). In addition, investigation into the lives of famous men gives a kind of scoptophilic permission, David W. Allen (1974) claims, permission to look, to see, to understand the previously forbidden, unknown, or concealed. The narrator's compulsive curiosity, his propensity for brooding over the problematical, and his unfruitful inquisitiveness in general indicate the voyeur's helplessness when confronting sexually provocative ideas or situations (Abraham, 1913).1

The interest the protagonist shows in Juliana Bordereau and her papers mirrors, in part, a voyeur's desire to know sexual facts as experienced by others, making inquiry a sexual aim of its own and a

—————————————

* This is Part II of this inquiry. For Part I, see Walter Anderson, this Journal, Vol. 69, No. 4, 1982.

- 101 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]