BREAKING: The media is not pro-gay enough. In fact, according
to Michelangelo Signorile, the media is explicitly anti-gay. It’s hard to argue with crazy.

The editor of Huffington Post’s Gay Voices, Signorile, is calling for
the media to be intolerant “of all forms” of “bigotry against LGBT people.” And
by bigotry, he means anything less than celebration.

His reasoning? Well, from time to time conservative and Christian
pundits are given air time on the major networks. That’s right, Signorile protests at the
very notion that someone who disagrees with his lifestyle is allowed to speak
in public.

He even devotes an entire chapter to what he calls the
“media’s ‘both sides’ delusion.” In it, he argues that when the media brings on
conservative guests, they are giving a platform to “bigotry” that “should simply
no longer be acceptable,” comparing it to CNN giving air time to white
supremacists. He states that it is one of the media’s “responsibilities” to
decide “what is and is not acceptable speech” in our society. And woe unto they
that don’t hew to Signorile’s idea of “acceptable speech.”

Many prominent
Christians and conservatives should not be allowed to speak to the media,
according to Signorile. His “antigay” haters list is long and includes the
Catholic League’s Bill Donohue, talk show hosts Laura Ingraham and Dana Loesch,
Red State’s “extreme right blogger”
Erick Erickson, Focus on the Family’s James Dobson, Family Research Council’s
Tony Perkins and sports analysts David
Tyree and Tony
Dungy.

Signorile’s description
of these people and the groups they represent is anything but balanced.
For example, he characterizes the Family Research Council as a “viciously anti
gay right-wing group” and calls Red
State’s Erickson an “out-and-out racist” who compared blacks to Nazis.
Erickson did not say anything close to that, but what else would you expect
from someone whose own hatred for conservatives impedes basic reading
comprehension?

Signorile argues that only “anti-gay” Christians and
conservatives are given air time by the media. Signorile claims that they do
not speak for the majority of Christians and conservatives who are just fine
with gay marriage.

Why, for example, is Donohue used
to represent all Catholics when he obviously does not? It could be that media
executives are bowing to religious conservatives’ charges of a liberal and
pro-gay bias in the media. Laura Ingraham has been noted as one of the biggest
purveyors of this myth, and it obviously worked out well for her, winning her a
spot on ABC.

But Signorile doesn’t just charge the media to discriminate
against Christians and conservatives, he also calls for businesses to. In an
ironic twist, Signorile
rails against discrimination against gays in hiring practices yet explicitly
calls for businesses to discriminate against people who disagree with him. In a
chapter on homophobia in professional sports, he demands “teams send a message,
right now, to young people that homophobia is not accepted. And that means
giving more than a slap on the wrist for homophobic comments and actions, and it means not hiring virulently antigay
individuals in prominent positions.”

We already know what Signorile considers “virulently antigay”
so he’s basically calling for a Christians and conservative blacklist.

In a candid and revealing passage of the epilogue, Signorile bares his bigoted
views, front and center:

In fact, it’s time for us to be intolerant – intolerant of all forms of
homophobia, transphobia, and bigotry against LGBT people. People often use the
phrase “let’s agree to disagree” when they respect but do not share the
different positions of their friends or colleagues … [but] Anything less than full acceptance and full civil rights must be
defined as an expression of bias, whether implicit or explicit. And it has to be called out ... if we’re to get
beyond tolerance.