you see OKC, 9/11, Knife attacks of which there are plenty all stem from the problem...

you see if even if you take away guns all together the root problem is still there, do you agree?

again, you and I don't agree

there are hundreds of thousands if not a million or more "crazy" people in this country

the problem is not that they are crazy it's that they can get their hands on guns (a problem will will never eradicate) and that often they get their hands on guns that allow them to kill 10, 15, 20 people in a matter of seconds

it's a completely childish conclusion to pretend it's just crazy people and it even contradicts your own answer of "yes" when I asked you if we should do anything from the "gun side" to mitigate this problem

"A tiny percentage of the mentally ill become mass killers. Just about everyone around Tucson shooter Jared Loughner sensed he was mentally ill and dangerous. But in effect, he had to kill before he could be put away — and (forcibly) treated.

Random mass killings were three times more common in the 2000s than in the 1980s, when gun laws were actually weaker. Yet a 2011 University of California at Berkeley study found that states with strong civil commitment laws have about a one-third lower homicide rate."

"A tiny percentage of the mentally ill become mass killers. Just about everyone around Tucson shooter Jared Loughner sensed he was mentally ill and dangerous. But in effect, he had to kill before he could be put away — and (forcibly) treated.

Random mass killings were three times more common in the 2000s than in the 1980s, when gun laws were actually weaker. Yet a 2011 University of California at Berkeley study found that states with strong civil commitment laws have about a one-third lower homicide rate."

great job disproving your own premise that crazy people are the problem

there are hundreds of thousands if not a million or more "crazy" people in this country

the problem is not that they are crazy it's that they can get their hands on guns (a problem will will never eradicate) and that often they get their hands on guns that allow them to kill 10, 15, 20 people in a matter of seconds

it's a completely childish conclusion to pretend it's just crazy people and it even contradicts your own answer of "yes" when I asked you if we should do anything from the "gun side" to mitigate this problem

An official from the D.C. police told a member of the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives that David Gregory COULD display a high capacity magazine on "Meet the Press" Sunday ... TMZ has learned.

Well-placed law enforcement sources tell TMZ ... a staffer from "Meet the Press" called ATF before the show aired to inquire about the legality of David holding the empty magazine during a segment on gun control. We're told the ATF person contacted the D.C. police to find out if the District of Columbia -- the place where the show is broadcast -- had a law prohibiting such a display.

Our sources say the D.C. police official informed ATF David could legally show the magazine, provided it was empty. An ATF official then called the staffer from "Meet the Press" to inform them they could use the magazine.

D.C. police released a statement today, saying "NBC contacted the Metropolitan Police Dept. inquiring if they could utilize a high capacity magazine for this segment. NBC was informed that possession of a high capacity magazine is not permissible and the request was denied."

It appears "Meet the Press" may have gotten 2 different answers from law enforcement.

"Random mass killings were three times more common in the 2000s than in the 1980s, when gun laws were actually weaker. Yet a 2011 University of California at Berkeley study found that states with strong civil commitment laws have about a one-third lower homicide rate."

So in states with strong civil commitment laws the homicide rate is 1/3 less...Id call that pretty significant

"Random mass killings were three times more common in the 2000s than in the 1980s, when gun laws were actually weaker. Yet a 2011 University of California at Berkeley study found that states with strong civil commitment laws have about a one-third lower homicide rate."

So in states with strong civil commitment laws the homicide rate is 1/3 less...Id call that pretty significant

Again address the actual problem strawman

Straw does not want the problem fixed since that means there is no argument left on guns for him to exploit tragedies on.

"Random mass killings were three times more common in the 2000s than in the 1980s, when gun laws were actually weaker. Yet a 2011 University of California at Berkeley study found that states with strong civil commitment laws have about a one-third lower homicide rate."

So in states with strong civil commitment laws the homicide rate is 1/3 less...Id call that pretty significant

Again address the actual problem strawman

still waiting for you to explain your plan on "subtracting crazy people"

I assume it's the same as your plan to get rid of world hunger by "subtracting starving people"

Looking forward to hearing your solution

I'm sure you Congressperson will be interested too since and you can become famous for your brilliant solution