Josiah Carlson wrote:
> A read callback, a write callback. What about close, error, connect,
> and accept callbacks?
Yep, all those as well.
> I hate to say it (not really), but that's pretty much the handle_*()
> methods of asyncore :/ .
Well, then, what's the problem?
Is there anything else people want that asyncore doesn't
provide, or is it just a matter of nailing down the existing
API a little?
--
Greg