“Dershowitz is not only a remarkable liar and slanderer, but also an
extreme opponent of elementary civil rights” Noam
Chomsky

The following is an analytical yet amusing glimpse into the deceitful and
psychological nature of Zionist propaganda as manifested by arch
Zionist Alan Dershowitz.

Dershowitz wrote
last week, “in a recent post, Atzmon said that he would be willing to
play alongside David Duke. What a duet!”

This little insignificant anecdote brought a smile to my face because in my
text I was actually positively considering joining a new healing musical
adventure along together with Alan Dershowitz on tuba and David Duke on
trumpet.

Here are my words, “I really do not understand why Alan Dershowitz
believes himself to be morally superior to Duke. Dershowitz is a
Zionist Jewish supremacist, he is a world leading advocate of a racist and
expansionist ideology, namely Zionism. And yet, I wouldn’t say NO to an
invitation for a musical gathering along together with Dershowitz on tuba
and Duke playing the trumpet, just because I believe that music brings
people together.”

The text is plainly clear. There is no room for misinterpretation. It was
not a ‘duet’ which I was willing to join but actually a ‘trio’ that would
include Alan Dershowitz alongside David Duke. Dershowitz lied again. Instead
of just politely declining and admitting that he is ‘no good’ on tuba, he
followed once again his falsehearted tactics-first he put words in my mouth
and then interpreted the words he himself invented. “But that's
exactly where Atzmon belongs,” wrote Dershowitz - “in the company of
neo-Nazis, Holocaust deniers, homophobes, misogynists, sexists and other
bigots.”

If Dershowitz was an intellectual, which he isn’t or an artist which he
certainly isn’t, one could have argued that this kind of behaviour suggests
that the elder Zionist may live in a cute phantasmic solipsistic universe.
If Dershowitz wasn’t aware of his deceitful actions, he could have been
classified as a psychopath. But I actually, tend to believe that there is a
certain level of awareness behind Dershowitz actions. And the conclusion is,
indeed, very concerning, we are dealing with an inherently dishonest person,
a ‘remarkable liar’, as Noam Chomsky describes him along together many other
intellectual and humanists who have reached the same conclusion.

But why is he lying? Why is he doing it so often? Can he get away with
it? Clearly not anymore, yet he wouldn’t stop. At this stage he cannot stop.

In The Wandering Who I
attempt to grasp the ideological, intellectual and emotional apparatus
at the core of Jewish identity politics. I try to analyse the deceitful
operative mode that is, unfortunately, symptomatic to Zionist campaigners,
Israeli Hasbara but also to very many anti Zionist Zionists (AZZ). The book
is basically an attempt to grasp the ideological continuum between the
Dershowitzes of this world and their collaborators within the Palestinian
solidarity movement and beyond.

It is pretty obvious that Dershowitz lies continuously because, like the
Israeli Mossad, he hopes to win his Hasbara wars ‘by
way of deception’.

Dershowitz lies compulsively because Zionism, which he advocates, is
inherently deceitful. Dershowitz lies consciously because Zionism, which he
supports enthusiastically, is also consciously impervious to ‘Truth, Justice
and Peace’- Zionism strives on a continual conflict, it is based on a
falsehood (the invention of the Jewish people and their homecoming) and it
is also a racially driven ethnic cleansing philosophy fuelled by
expansionism.

But there is obviously a deeper psychoanalytical layer here. When
Dershowitz claims to detest ‘bigots’ and ‘Nazis’, he may as well admit a
certain amount of self-loathing. In The Wandering Who, I elaborate on the
work of Austrian philosopher Otto Weininger who cleverly pointed out that
“we hate qualities (in others) to which we approximate”. If Weininger is
correct, we have a good reason to believe that Dershowitz probably hates
bigots and neo Nazis because he may recognise such qualities in himself. In
Freudian terms, he simply projects.

Such a reading, however, would assume a certain amount of guilt at the
core of Dershowitz’ psychology. But guilt as such must be driven by an
elementary amount of ethical awareness. Sadly enough, there is no evidence
of such awareness in Dershowitz’ conduct.

Weininger contended that his insight into self-loathing explains why the
most profound ‘anti Semites’ are very often Jews. They fight ‘the Jew’
in themselves. I would add here that self-hatred may as well be the highest
possible form of Jewish universal ethical awareness. It is no surprise then
that the greatest Jewish humanists (Jesus, Spinoza and Marx) were all
self-haters. Dershowitz could do with a tinge of self mockery or even
a drop of self-loathing. Such an approach could heal his soul and even amend
his reputation. Dershowitz wouldn’t even have to work too
hard. The man can easily find in himself every and each possible aspect of
Zionist ugliness.

The Passion of Dershowitz

In recent years I have detected some fragility in Dershowitz conduct and
it leads me to believe that the elder Zionist doesn’t really feel great
about himself. Rather occasionally the man contradicts his own statements.
On the one hand he would repeat himself insisting that Atzmon is
insignificant intellectually politically and even musically, on the other
hand he is doing little in his life but fighting Atzmon and Atzmon’s
endorsers. Last week Dershowitz invited himself to the Manhattan Friends
Seminary to lecture on the ‘dangers of the sort of anti-Semitic hatred
spewed by Atzmon.’ Surely, Atzmon must be important enough then.

Contradictions are pretty revealing. They point to a cognitive
dissonance. It seems as if Dershowitz’ universe is shaken. He clearly finds
it hard to cope with it all both emotionally and intellectually.

I have recently even detected an element of desperation in Dershowitz
behaviour. The Zionist fanatic is aware of himself becoming a laughable
cliché. Like a 12th grade student, he is now pushed to furnish and validate
his lies and spin campaigns with some pseudo academic formality. Though he
would quote out of context, consciously cherry picking isolated anecdotes
with a clear attempt to attribute a misleading meaning to people and ideas,
he would also provide a meticulous bibliographical reference hoping that no
one would ever really check and review the texts he clearly distorted.
Dershowitz is desperate to convey an image of an appropriate academic
formalism to cover for the lack of integrity and content.

I have noticed that many Zionist as well as AZZ
operators are using the exact same tactics. Inherently dishonest people
tend to believe that formality can be grasped as intellectual integrity.
I don’t have a doubt that Dershowitz, Zionists and AZZ ‘got away’ with this
tactic for a while, however, once you buy yourself a reputation of a
‘remarkable liar’, the image of formality may even make you look more
foolish and mischievous than what you are for real.

Such an operation doesn’t reflect greatly on Dershowitz or any other
Hasbara operators. But it certainly exposes a volatile mental state. In the
case of Dershowitz what we see is a clear discrepancy between what he claims
or wishes to be and what he happens to be for real. This discrepancy between
the phantasy of ‘academicism’ or ‘formality’ and the reality of being known
as a ‘remarkable liar’ is at the heart of Dershowitz’ and Zionist
neurosis. But this neurosis is also symptomatic to different forms of Jewish
identity politics and even contemporary Left thinking. If ‘unconsciousness
is the discourse of the other’ as French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan
suggests, then Dershowitz, AZZ and the Left are tormented by the
possibility of their real truth being exposed. For the Left it is its
emerging detachment and irrelevance reflected by the victorious rise of
Islam as the leading and probably only anti imperial liberating force. For
the AZZ it is the the growing awareness of its Jewish left disingenuous
tribal role within the solidarity movement. For Dershowitz it is the
exhausting and tormenting recognition that actually, it is him and his
relentless actions that gives Jews bad name.

I initially thought that Dershowitz would benefit from playing tuba under
my direct supervision. Music is the embodiment of truth and beauty and it
also has a clear therapeutic value. I thought that devotion to aesthetics
would elevate the suffering man and his spirit high above his tribal
loyalty. I also thought that Dershowitz would benefit from sharing a musical
platform with David Duke. It is not a secret that Duke bought himself very
many enemies along the years but as far as I am aware, no one has ever
called him a ‘remarkable Liar’. I thought that after a while alongside Duke,
Dershowitz may learn to state his Judeo-centric truth in a clear and honest
manner.

Being a devoted humanist I do not have any plan to give up on brother
Dershowitz. He knows that he will join the band eventually. If it isn’t the
tuba, we can always provide him with a bagpipe. After all, the man is full
of hot air.