salisburyboy was an adamant racist and conspiracy theorist who would post long, formulaic hate-posts in TSB and then largely refrain from participating in any debate. A number of us wanted him banned for a while, and we finally got our wish when he created a thread with a video from Russia showing two immigrants being brutally murdered and dumped in the woods by neo-nazis. This was under a thread title like, "Russia knows what to do about illegal immigrants."

So, as to "what he did," I guess the answer is "Posting graphic depictions of murder as instructional material."

The Soap Box (and TWW in general) are better off without him. At best he was too offensive for even this site, and at worst he was a public image disaster waiting to happen. The News and Observer might've had a field day with that kid, and I don't know about you, I don't want a headline about NCSU being full of immigrant-decapitating hillbilly fucks.

There was an article in (i think) Harper's not that long ago about some white nationalist group that was doing all these underground videos on how to resist the coming Obama presidency and I imagined that the guy in the article running the company (which was based in Raleigh and filmed some videos at Yates Mill Pond) was salisburyboy.

"like him or hate him, hooksaw has as much "right" to be here as anyone. Even if you despised the political viewpoint he represented, his buffoonery was entertaining. Its not like he ever advocated violence or racism."

You say, in defense of hooksaw, that he was not a supporter of violence or racism.

And in this thread, you support the reinstatement of a person who, by your own admission, was a violent racist.

It strikes me as being, ah, incongruous at best.

They are clearly very different people. Hooksaw has, indeed, never once promoted violence or racism.* But the fact that you use contrary defenses for each is a bit sickening, and if anything it's got to be offensive to one (or both) of the beneficiaries of your support.

Quote :

"that's quite a compliment, and surely must elevate me as some sort of superior troll"

Fortunately, I'm not in the position of having to give a damn about your motivations.

You continue to advocate the liberation of a person who is, frankly, persona non grata not only on this website, but in the entire human race.

He's not dirt. He's lower than dirt. He's the kind of person that, back in my grandfather's day, they used to hang at Nuremberg trials. You can support him on a lark, but that doesn't make the act acceptable. You want to support shit, that's fine. But as far as I'm concerned, that makes you shit, too. Regardless of Joshua's love.

But I don't. I'm shit. But at least I can take some satisfaction in knowing I'm better than salisburyboy.

At least I don't change my mind on the subject constantly. I've demonstrated in this thread that you have gone from being one of his sincerest opponents to one of the most vociferous supporters of his reinstatement. Congratulations, you're a great supporter of...hell, I don't even know what. Apparently just being contradictory.

"you have [become] ... one of the most vociferous supporters of his reinstatement"

maaaan, you're fucking crazy. yes, i sometimes miss the drama he provided, but i know bringing him back would be a mistake. not like it would even matter, anyhow: it's been almost 2 years, the little shit is long gone. i seriously doubt he's lurking in the shadows plotting his return.

anyhow, if you werent crying about your sore asshole, or whatever you're bitching about, you'd realize that most everyone else here is clowning around in a thread about gay cowboys, jews and edomites.

Eh, what can I say. I spent a lot of effort trying to get rid of the little shit. I made a retard of myself participating in the cheese revolution, and I was on Duke's case constantly to get him axed for good. Forgive me if I remain a bit touchy on the subject.

Quote :

"i seriously doubt he's lurking in the shadows plotting his return."

I seriously doubt he has anything better to do with his time. Actually, come to think of it, I'd almost like to let him out of the can for maybe a week to see if he posted anything. I'd give it 50/50 odds.

You say, in your accusal of Salisburyboy, that he was a supporter of violent racism.

Yet with this last post, you support a week's reinstatement of a person who, by your own admission, is a violent racist.

It strikes me as being, ah, incongruous at best.

The fact that you hold contrary positions on this is a bit sickening, and if anything it's got to be offensive to one (or both) of the beneficiaries of your support.

You are advocating for a week's liberation of a person who is, frankly, persona non grata not only on this website, but in the entire human race.

He's not dirt. He's lower than dirt. He's the kind of person that, back in my grandfather's day, they used to hang at Nuremberg trials. You can support him on a lark, but that doesn't make the act acceptable. You want to support shit, that's fine. But as far as I'm concerned, that makes you shit, too. Regardless of hooksaw's love.

At least I don't change my mind on the subject constantly. I've demonstrated in this thread that you have gone from being one of his sincerest opponents to one of the most vociferous supporters of his reinstatement. Congratulations, you're a great supporter of...hell, I don't even know what. Apparently just being contradictory.

Supporting violence is OK! Unless it's against hooksaw, then supporting non-violence is not OK!