Sunday, August 16, 2015

Liberals Have Obama’s Back as Al Franken Supports Iran Deal

Liberals have President Barack Obama’s back on the Iran deal, as Senator
Al Franken (D-MN) came out in strong support of it in an op-ed
published Thursday on CNN. Count Franken as a yes vote for sanity.

Franken writes that he didn’t come to this
conclusion lightly, “Since the deal was announced, I’ve consulted with
nuclear and sanctions experts inside and outside government; Obama
administration officials, including Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz;
ambassadors from the other countries that negotiated alongside us;
advocates for Israel on both sides of the issue; my constituents in
Minnesota; and, of course, my colleagues in the Senate.”

The Democratic Senator explained that the deal isn’t
perfect, but he called it “strong”, saying it is “the most effective,
realistic way to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon anytime in
the next 15 years.”

Franken addressed some of the criticism of the deal which has inaccurately claimed that President Obama is just “trusting” Iran.

“You don’t have to trust the regime’s intentions to
understand the reality it would face: Attempting to cheat on this
agreement would carry an overwhelming likelihood of getting caught — and
serious consequences if it does… But there’s no doubt in my mind that
this deal represents a significant step forward for our national
security.”

And what are the alternatives coming from the
critics? They have no alternatives, except war. Franken wrote that their
alternatives “run the gamut from unrealistic to horrifying. For
example, some say that, should the Senate reject this agreement, we
would be in position to negotiate a “better” one. But I’ve spoken to
representatives of the five nations that helped broker the deal, and
they agree that this simply wouldn’t be the case.”

That is very troubling, and a fact that should be at
the forefront of this debate. There will be no better deal. That is not
in the alternative plans. Franken pointed out that we would not be able
to come back to the bargaining table and “… of course, Iran would be
able to move forward on its nuclear program, endangering our interests
in the region — especially Israel — and making it far more likely that
we will find ourselves engaged in a military conflict there.”

Military conflict is the alternative to the imperfect deal.

Franken charged that some critics lusted after such a
conflict and reminded them of their epic fail the last time they pulled
this card, “… with one of my colleagues suggesting that we should
simply attack Iran now, an exercise he believes would be quick and
painless for the United States. But this is pure fantasy, at least
according to what our security and intelligence experts tell us. And
it’s certainly not the lesson anyone should have learned from the
disastrous invasion of Iraq.”

The Minnesota Senator said prior to the historic
Iran deal, our choices were dire, “… allowing it to have a nuclear bomb
or having to bomb the country ourselves. This agreement represents a
chance to break out of that no-win scenario.”

Liberals want to avoid unnecessary wars. All options
should be explored first. President Obama’s foreign policy doctrine is
diplomacy first, which was a major draw for voter support in 2008 and
2012, as the nation had yet to recover from the Bush administration’s
misguided and disastrous Iraq invasion.

Senator Franken is signaling that the liberals in
the Democratic caucus have examined this incredible deal (and it is
incredible, to sit down with enemies and hammer something this tough
out) and are choosing to vocally support and advocate for it. The House Democrats are already on board.

While the country is sighing a huge breath of
relief, it must be noted that once again it is Democrats who are saving
us all from another crazy Republican scheme.

Copyright

Visits

Flags

FAIR USE NOTICE:

Documents on The Truth Be ToldMAY contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners. This non-profit use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which states: "Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." Some linked pages may contain offensive material, we take no responsibility or assume liability for their content or views contained therein and we do not monitor linked content.