If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

I don't think the choices in this poll are very fair. The vintage head can be improved while entirely utilizing the vintage design. It doesn't have to be "new" or 200X influenced to be improved. MOTUC Rattlor is a shining example of this.

"Oh Lord, Bless this M&M... and the mighty cockroach I slain in battle to get it." - Al Bundy

I don't think the choices in this poll are very fair. The vintage head can be improved while entirely utilizing the vintage design. It doesn't have to be "new" or 200X influenced to be improved. MOTUC Rattlor is a shining example of this.

the vintage wasn't that good because of the action feature. without that action feature compromising the sculpt it would turn out much different.
we would probably get two heads also as the snakes out look or him normal look.

Even as a kid I thought the vintage snakeface was lame. King Hiss was awesome, Tung Lashor looked bright and was cool and Rattlor kicked butt. Snakeface never did it for me until 200x, so I'm voting Improved sculpt all the way!

either an improved sculpt or the 200x design, classics is supposed to be a remake of the line incorperating all eras not being limited by 80's technology, to do a straight vintage remake with no improvement is a disservice to this line

i voted vintage because any vintage design done by the horsemen has an improved sculpt. ergo both choices are effectively the same. however i vote vintage to show prefrence for an interpritation based on that

the vintage wasn't that good because of the action feature. without that action feature compromising the sculpt it would turn out much different.
we would probably get two heads also as the snakes out look or him normal look.