January 12, 2005

CBS Documents Panel's Findings: A Few Comments

I've always liked Richard Thornburgh, but I am very disappointed with some of the panel's findings. When you think about it, its findings could be considered a net plus for CBS, a veritable whitewash. That is, we already knew the documents were forged -- no reasonable question about it whatsoever. And we knew that CBS was politically motivated to fabricate this story despite its utter bogusness (is that a word?). Yet the panel affirmatively concluded -- as I mentioned in the last post -- that CBS's wrongdoing here was not politically motivated, but done in a spirit of the competitive rush to get the "story" out -- as if it really was a story.

But the panel went out of its way to conclude that it was unable to conclude with certainty whether the documents were authentic. And, it went out of its way to find no political motive. One has to strongly consider Tony Blankley's theory that the panel was tainted, given that Thornburgh's law firm, which conducted the primary background investigation, legally represents CBS. There couldn't be a more flagrant conflict of interest, on its face. That is, the law firm's duty to its client, and its fiduciary relationship with it, deter it from exercising independence in this matter. If this panel can be considered "independent" considering these relationships, there is no longer any meaning to the conflict of interest principle.

And further on my point that CBS scored a net plus with the report, I refer you to Jonathan Last's excellent column in the Weekly Standard. You all probably know about this already, and if so, I apologize. I've been in a cave for the last few days.

Last's point is clear. The two main experts the panel considered concluded, with virtual certainty, that the documents couldn't have been produced on a typewriter during the seventies, but a modern computer. The panel had no basis upon which not to accept the experts' conclusion. Instead, they made themselves experts, making this finding in a footnote, in justification for their failure to conclude the documents were indeed forged -- which they emphatically were:

Although his reasoning seems credible and persuasive, the Panel does not know for certain whether Tytell has accounted for all alternative typestyles that might have been available on typewriters during that era.

What the panel is saying is that despite Tytell's expert findings, the panel can't accept his findings because no one has proven a negative. That is, no one has demonstrated that Tytell accounted for all alternative typestyles. That is so absurd. No court of law or administrative hearing body requires proof to a 100% certainty. I'm sad to say this, but the panel's tortured effort to bend over backward to refuse the uniform conclusion of BOTH experts is strong circumstantial evidence of its lack of independence and its failure to perform its job fairly and competently. As Jonathan Last says in his closing paragraph: Leave aside the "no political bias" finding;

Leave aside the kid-glove treatment of Dan Rather and Andrew Heyward. This abdication of responsibility by the panel in the face of their own expert's conclusions is so startling that it legitimately calls into question--by itself--everything else in the report.

And folks, there is no question about Last's conclusion. Which is what I mean by CBS's net plus here. They ended up much better than they started (before the investigation) -- at least on paper. And that itself is scandalous -- and sad.

Posted by David Limbaugh at January 12, 2005 06:13 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.davidlimbaugh.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/332

» Country Destroyed - No WMDs from the Command TOC
I should not be surprised I suppose. The biggest story today was that the Bush administration ADMITs there are no WMDs and have not been any since 1991 and you just keep ranting on and on about Dan Rather. blah blah blah.... [Read More]

Tracked on January 13, 2005 01:20 AM

» CBS More Accountable Than The US Government from the Command TOC
CBS fired four executives and basically is removing their long standing anchor because they reported on documents that turned out to be forged. People have said, "They should have checked them out".
So, where the hell is the accountability at the ... [Read More]

Tracked on January 13, 2005 01:49 AM

» Thursday Linkage/Open Thread from La Shawn Barber's Corner
Here's a round-up of interesting links around the blogosphere:
--- Buck has been busy. Check out his guide for web site creation for bloggers.
--- Josh Clayborn and Hugh Hewitt discuss: "What American not in government has the most influence --... [Read More]

Tracked on January 13, 2005 07:41 AM

» More Reaction To The Report from PoliPundit.com
David Limbaugh was traveling when the Rathergate report came out, but he has now posted his comments on it here and here. They are worth taking a look at, especially since he is as outraged as I was about the political motivation section of the repo... [Read More]

Tracked on January 13, 2005 01:50 PM

» - from Personal Injury Lawyer
Personal injury attorneys and lawyers typically represent clients (plaintiffs) who have been injured either financially or physically due to the fault of another. [Read More]

Tracked on February 4, 2005 10:23 PM

» - from Cialis
Be sure to buy Cialis online! We have the solution against ED. Try our Cialis offer now and you'll be satisfied! [Read More]