Don't Let the Robber Barons Fool You

I thought it might be timely for April Fool's Day to talk about the foolish status of our modern day celebrity and robber baron fascination. As I write inHoodwinked, we've made icons out of the likes of Donald Trump, a ruthless real estate developer, who publicly glorifies the firing and humiliation of people on TV.

During this ratings season millions tune in to see Trumps' glee of firing fellow celebs on "Celebrity Apprentice," and Trump announced (APWire, March 18, 2010) that the next season is already in filming. The AP story cites, "Trump's revived Apprentice will recruit candidates who have lost their jobs, are stuck with jobs they don't like to just get by or have finished college with no offers in sight."

Trump has been quoted as saying, "You can't be emotional in business; it will flat out kill you."

So, while we Americans are out of work, hungry, angry, and disempowered, this might be the perfect opportunity for all of us to take a good hard look at these so-called celebrities and icons that we prop up and, by association, expect future generations to emulate.

During the past four decades, we the people have sent a strong message of support to the modern equivalent of the robber barons. Jack Welch, former CEO of General Electric, is a prime example. He eliminated over 100,000 jobs at his company while taking huge bonuses and raises. He fought New York state, vehemently opposing environmental regulations that would have cleaned up the Hudson River and protected the lives of his own employees. By shifting GE from primarily manufacturing to financial services, he was a major driving force behind the U.S, economy's unhealthy transformation from production to paper.

When I speak to young students and at MBA conferences, I say, "If you want to honor Jack Welch, give him credit for being one of the chief architects of our current environmental and economic crisis."

We plaster the faces of billionaires on the covers of our magazines and praise them for donating fortunes to charities without bothering to point out that they made many times those fortunes by beating down their competitors. We watch shows about the rich and famous and in so doing, send messages to our children that they should aspire to living in mansions and traveling in private jets – regardless of how much environmental and social havoc is caused in the process.

Do we really want our future generations to embrace the horrible message of the bumper sticker, "He who dies with the most toys wins"?

The truth, we all know, is that no matter how many toys we amass we leave them behind when we die, just as we leave a broken environment, an economy that only benefits the richest, and a legacy of empowering greed over goodness.It is now time to commit to following a new path.

I believe that every one of us can change this by making our own demands on the media. We can demand that the prime media outlets cover how men and women live their lives meaningfully. Men and women who found non-profits, work tirelessly in aiding others, and don't ever base their success on a bottom-line profit margin for shareholders.

What if we all boycotted these shows? Celebrity Apprentice and other similar ones during this season? And wrote emails demanding they stop producing these shows? It is really very simple. Here, for example, is the link for NBC http://www.nbc.com/contact/general/ .

This month, I encourage you to tweet out, Facebook message, and email the corporate entities in media and tell them we've had enough of CELEBRITY. Use their Twitter profile (eg - http://www.twitter.com/celebApprentice, and post your message to your followers. NO MORE ROBBER BARON CELEBRITIES.

OTHER RESOURCES:

And I know I have mentioned the film "Crude", an amazing and beautifully filmed documentary about the critical lawsuit filed on behalf of 30,000 Ecuadorian people in the Amazon against Texaco/Chevron. A MUST SEE! I wanted to note that it is now available on DVD through http://www.crudethemovie.com .

I'm also looking forward to seeing you at one of the many upcoming speaking events. The list for all events can be found on my website – http://www.johnperkins.org as well as on my Facebook Fan Page – John Perkins Author .

Many thanks and blessings,

John

John PerkinsNew York Times bestselling author of "CONFESSIONS OF AN ECONOMIC HIT MAN" and "THE SECRET HISTORY OF THE AMERICAN EMPIRE"

It depends on how long its been open and the ceirdt limit and how much you owe on your other ceirdt cards.If it's you oldest trade line, it could damage your score quite a bit. If it is your biggest limit card it may throw off your capacity ratio. For example, if I have 2 ceirdt cards one with a $ 1000 ceirdt limit and another with a $ 5000 ceirdt limit and I owe $ 500 on the first card then I only owe 8.3% of what I have available, this may lower my score by 4-5 points, BUT, if I close the $ 5000 ceirdt limit, then I owe 50% of what I have availble, cuasing my score to drop by 30-50 points! Capacity is huge.Remember your income is not on your ceirdt report so the assumption is that if you don't use all of your limits, then you don't need the money, but if you do, you NEED the money and must be struggling. Therefore, your score goes down.The FICO is an indicator of financial health and how likely you are to go into bankruptcy. It may be your best bet to leave the card open and not use it very often, if you do, make sure you can pay it off at the end of the month.

Honestly, I think you'd make a fucking bad ass US History thecaer for all the reasons you've mentioned above. I kind of am jealous that I never had a thecaer who tried to make the material relate-able and understandable in modern day pop culture terms I probably would have done way better in class and retained a lot more. Instead all the kids in my class were smart as fuck and I felt stupid for ever even asking a question. That is why I am still dumb to this day.