Techdirt. Stories about "riya"Easily digestible tech news...https://www.techdirt.com/
en-usTechdirt. Stories about "riya"https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/td-88x31.gifhttps://www.techdirt.com/Wed, 4 May 2011 04:14:27 PDTHow One Startup Used Patents To Kill A (Better) CompetitorMike Masnickhttps://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110429/03154714083/how-one-startup-used-patents-to-kill-better-competitor.shtml
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110429/03154714083/how-one-startup-used-patents-to-kill-better-competitor.shtmlkilled off a better competitor with patents. In a strategically timed move, it sued the competitor, Modista, just days before it was going to close funding:

The lawsuit caused investors including Kumar to drop out, for fear of dealing with an expensive lawsuit that could cost more than they had even planned to invest. Because Modista had no money to defend the suit in court, the company later shut down.

This sort of story is more common than you might imagine. I recently had a conversation with a serial entrepreneur who told a similar story. One of his previous companies had been quite successful, and was on the verge of being acquired for upwards of $70 million. Days before the deal was to be closed, one of their competitors got wind of the deal, and filed a patent infringement lawsuit against them, leading the acquirer to drop the deal. Without the funds to fight the lawsuit, the entrepreneur had no other option but to sell his company to the company who sued him for less than $5 million.

Ask around, and you discover that this happens all the time -- patent holders using patents not to innovate, but to block and kill other companies -- especially when those companies really are more innovative and have a better product.