My thoughts on recent movies I've seen in the theaters or watched on DVD. Based on a lifetime of movie watching with no prejudices: black and white or color, silent or sound, Hollywood or foreign, old or new.

Thursday, May 31, 2012

300th Post: Oscar Chances for "The Avengers", and Other Stuff

This will be my 300th post and I never figured my
blogging efforts would last this long. I wanted to do something special for my
300th post, but was at a loss as to what to write about.

I had a couple of topics in mind, but couldn’t make a final
decision. You would think I was deciding the fate of the world.

No more muddling though, so this post will be a mix of those
topics, ideas that have been noodling around in my mind of late, with the
recent box office sensation “The Avengers” at the center of all this upcoming
meandering. I beg for lots of indulgence.

I’ve been happily participating in the weekly Alternate
Oscars series at the wonderful Wonders in the Dark website. They’re up to 1941
now, the year John Ford’s “How Green Was My Valley” beat “Citizen Kane” for
Best Oscar honors.

I love “Citizen Kane” and, audaciousness and inventiveness
aside, I think it’s a hugely entertaining movie. But “How Green Was My Valley”
is an equally glorious achievement in its own way, and I don’t have a problem
with it earning top prize that year.

It’s very easy to pick on the Oscars, and how they often get
it wrong, and how they honor conservative, playing-it-safe movies instead of
more groundbreaking work. How rarely, we say, the Oscars get it right.

But I love the Oscars and always have, and while the Oscars
may not always get it right, I think the Oscars often act as a fascinating barometer
reflecting society – and movies – in that given year.

The Artist’s Oscar
Win

The 2011 Best Picture Oscar winner was the charming “The
Artist”, a black and white silent movie about a matinee idol’s fear of the
upcoming talking picture revolution. Some might think “The Artist” to be a
slight fable, a nice enough movie, but hardly Best Picture material.

I’m wondering how it may
have resonated with Academy voters. “The Artist” is set in the late 1920s when
silent movies were giving way to talkies. There was much fear in the air in the
early years. Stars were afraid how their voices would record, there were sound
synchronization problems and the formerly mobile cameras were now still.

Today, the motion picture industry is facing a different
kind of revolution, but one that has many in the industry looking similarly
askance. 35mm film gives way to digital
projection, distribution patterns change from theaters to home viewing, not to
mention watching the latest blockbusters on handheld devices. There’s also the
fear that someday, CGI figures will replace the performers themselves. Not to
mention costume designers, set designers or construction crew people who will
see their jobs go away as more and more images are added via greenscreen in the
post-production process.

I wonder if many Academy members were subconsciously identifying
with George Valentin, the lead character in “The Artist” and wondering what
their futures hold. The clothing styles may change, but the trepidation of what
new technology means to the motion picture industry is the same whether its
1928 or 2012.

The Amazing
Popularity of “The Avengers”

Like I said, there is often more to popular entertainment
than meets the eye. I wonder what is so appealing about “The Avengers?” I know
two people who loved it, and thought it was one of the best movies they had
ever seen. But the Marvel Comes universe was new to them, had never seen any of
the Marvel movies that preceded “The Avengers.” and no idea of the back stories
of Iron Man, Thor, the Hulk, etc. So it wasn’t the continuation of the story
they were responding to, or the appeal of seeing their comic book heroes come
to life.

“The Avengers” is a happy surprise, well cast in a smart
screenplay, and a marvelous turn by Tom Huddleston as the villain Loki, There’s
some solid laughs here, and a couple of crowd-pleasing moments that elicited
more audience cheers than any movie I’ve seen in ages.

Still, I wonder how much of it may be wish fulfillment? For
the first half of the movie, The Avengers are a most dysfunctional group
bickering and sparring. But when the alien menace attacks New York City, differences are put aside, the
Avengers work together as a team and defeat the enemy, all for the common good.

Surely I was not the only one thinking why couldn’t this
happen in real life with our politicians? The country is currently faced with
seemingly insurmountable problems, yet much of Washington remains fiercely partisan.
Instead of coming together to face our challenges, they continue to bicker,
stall and point fingers at each other. Nothing gets done.

I think audiences may be seeing “The Avengers” as a wish
fulfillment experience, especially as its coming in the midst of
ever-increasing bad economic news. If the idiots in Washington can’t get their act get together,
at least our movie heroes can.

Could “The Avengers”
Be Nominated For Best Picture?

Back to the Oscars.

Like millions of other people around the world, I’ve seen
“The Avengers” and found it a most enjoyable time at the movies. If I had to
rate it on a scale of one to four stars, I would award it three stars.

Since its immense popularity among all age spectrums, I
began to wonder if the Academy will honor it with a Best Picture nomination?

Initial thought tells me no, it doesn’t deserve it. Another
thought tells me no comic book movie should get a Best Picture nomination. As
enjoyable as some of them are, most of them come down to adults running around
in costumes surrounded by CGI effects.I
can’t think of a single comic book movie deserving of a Best Picture nomination
except for “Superman” (1979). (No, I haven’t forgotten about “The Dark Knight” (2008),
and think it’s one of the 10 most overrated movies of all time.)

But then I began thinking of my Oscar history. The Academy
has a long history of awarding a Best Picture nomination to the most
financially successful movie of the year. If movies like “The Ten Commandments”
(1956), “Airport” (1970), “The Towering Inferno” (1974) and “Star Wars” (1977)
can get the nod, why not “The Avengers”?

Yet another thought tells me comic book movies are unworthy
of serious Oscar consideration. As a genre, comic book movies are like
swashbucklers. They have a pretty basic plot, good guys vs. bad guys, a pretty
girl or two, action, intrigue, and a rousing action conclusion. Pretty basic
stuff, and all cut pretty much from the same cloth.

But if I was a member of the Motion Picture
Academy in 1938, I would
not hesitate to mark my ballot for “The Adventures of Robin Hood” as Best
Picture of the Year. It may be the easiest Oscar vote I’d ever make.

Sure, it’s as basic a plot as you can get, with little or no
subtext at all. It’s an adventure film in the best sense, and while hardly a
film for academic studies and one to be pondered over afterwards, it remains as
satisfying a movie as I can imagine. It’s the one swashbuckler that I can see
winning a Best Picture Oscar.

So maybe one day a comic book movie will come along as
exhilarating as “The Adventures of Robin Hood”. It’s not “The Avengers”, but maybe
the next one will be the comic book equivalent of Errol Flynn’s classic.

More on “The Avengers”

If I do a Ten Best list at the end of the year, I don’t see “The
Avengers” making the top 10, but top 20 for sure. I can’t get totally behind it
for several reasons.It’s a bit overlong
(as most movies today tend to be), is lacking a good musical score and peters
out with a wimpy final scene. Plus, the idea that superheroes on display here
are seemingly invulnerable takes away from the overlong battle scene at the
end.

Regular readers of this blog will know how important I
consider a film’s musical score to be. Some films need minimal, or no scoring, and
some can get along with just source music, But darn it, there are times when a
big, brassy, triumphant, melodic, thematic score is called for. A movie like
“The Avengers.”

Instead, the usually reliable Alan Silvestri delivers a
routine score that could have been placed in any generic action movie.

It doesn’t ruin the movie, but it doesn’t do it any favors
either.I forget who said it, but a
famous film composer once said a film composer’s job is akin to a mortician’s. They
can’t bring a body to life, but they can make it look pretty.

A memorable score can’t save a bad movie. It’s never
happened and never will. But a memorable score can make a bad film bearable, a memorable
score can turn a good film into a great one and a memorable score can turn a
great film into an iconic one.

I don’t blame Mr. Silvestri, as he probably delivered what
was asked of him. Too many directors today are afraid of music and don’t know
how it works. They’re afraid it will take away from their “vision.” So they ask
for it to be as bland and unobtrusive as possible. Films today suffer because
of it.

Also in the demerit column is the film’s final scene. I’m
not talking about the scene showing an upcoming menace during the film’s credits
or the hilarious post-credits sequence, but the film’s final scene. It’s a
scene between non-superhero characters played by Samuel L. Jackson and Cobie
Smulders and it’s dull. It’s so dull I can barely remember it. To end an
exciting comic book movie with a scene as dull as anything found in the dullest
night in Dullsville, USA is disappointing.

I’m thinking of the final shot of a smiling Christopher
Reeve flying over Earth in “Superman” (1978) backed by that exhilarating John
Williams score. I wished “The Avengers” had ended in a similar way, something
to send the audience out soaring.

I swear filmmakers today are afraid of using music to elicit
an emotional response from viewers, as if that were a bad thing. I recently saw
the teaser trailer for the new 007 film “Skyfall” and it’s OK, but it’s backed
by the most generic music imaginable, making it look, and sound, like every
other action movie in the marketplace. It’s a Bond movie, for God’s sake, put
the Bond theme in there and make it something special. It’s not rocket science
folks.

I promise to be more cohesive in Post #301. I do hope to
blog several more times before my participation in the William Wyler blogathon, hosted by The Movie Projector,
June 24-29. I’m thrilled to be writing about the great western classic “The Big
Country” (1958) on Tuesday, June 26. That post will also be more cohesive.

7 comments:

I sometimes wonder if the people who vote for the Oscars are as emotionally invested as the movie fans in the selections. Do Academy members sneer at each other for years over rival voting? I see nothing wrong in a satisfying motion picture experience like "The Avengers" getting acknowledgement from the Academy. But, hey, I'm a gal who approves of the win for "The Greatest Show on Earth". What do I know?

It could easily have been Elmer. I'm also thinking Bernard Herrmann, David Raksin, Hugo Friedhofer or Alfred Newman. I have several books at home on film music but could not find the source. Film composers of Hollywood's Golden Age were considered some of the wittiest and sharpest folks in Hollywood.

I would have no problem with "The Avengers" getting a nomination nod. The final win - not so sure about.

Some work and life issues have prevented me of late from blogging, but I hope to resume a regular schedule soon.

Kevin, first congrats on reaching your milestone 300th post. Most impressive! Like you, I think if THE AVENGERS were to get a nod, it would be a tribute to what it did financially for the industry. I liked it pretty well, but--for the life of me--where were John Steed and Mrs. Peel?

I recently saw The Avengers (of course it was recently since it just came out!) Ha Ha

As you mentioned earlier in the post, The Artist winning it's well deserved Oscar, it left me thinking about your question on The Avengers possibly getting an Oscar nod.

Last year there were so many great films up for best picture and standout performances. After seeing ever nominated film, performance. I said to myself post Oscars "How often do we get this many amazing films in one year?"

I can't remember an award year where I've said that in a very long time. With that being said, I know that we always get the Oscar contenders towards the end of each year so I accept that summer blockbusters, while fun, occasionally entertaining I know that the cream of the crop are coming out later.

Getting to The Avengers. I went to see it because some friends who are big Marvel comic fans were going so I went along. Now usually I would pass because the genre isn't my cup of tea but since I've seen both Iron Man films and I'm also a huge fan of Downey Jr and Ruffalo I went willingly. (Okay, I did learn a lot too since I asked my friends 5000 questions about the Marvel Comic characters, who were included etc)

I found it visually appealing of course and the acting was solid for what it was. I just don't see it being Best Picture worthy unless we don't have a lot to choose from. Plus the genre usually doesn't get a lot of Oscar love. It's no Avatar. (Love that you mentioned Robin Hood) These are different times though so I'm holding out hope that Hollywood will deliver again. After all we have films like The Great Gatsby coming out in Dec. (Looking forward to that one)

I do think though that The Avengers will get a few nods but not Best Picture.

Do you think The Avengers is as good as The Lord of the Rings series or even say, Dark Knight? Just wondering if you think it compares.

So for such a long post here but this is an interesting topic to me.

Thanks for sharing your views on The Avengers and our Best Picture nods through the years.Page

Rick, thank you and believe me, you're not the only person missing the illustrious John Steed and Mrs. Peel.

Page, I had no problems with The Lord of the Rings getting all those noms and eventual wins. It's filmmaking on an ambitious, grand scale and deserved its recognition.

While I don't think "The Avengers" should win Best Picture, I would have no problem with a nomination. It would merely follow the old Hollywood tradition of honoring a box office bonanza. It's not called show business for nothing.

I don't like "The Dark Knight" at all, finding it all rather forced and obvious.

I am looking forward, however, to the new Batman movie. Michael Caine is one of my favorite actors and I'll see him in anything. So I'm looking forward to "The Dark Knight Rises" as the new Michael Caine movie, but nothing more than that. Still, I hope it's good. When I enter a theater, I want every movie to be a good one.

I am intrigued by "The Great Gatsby" trailer, though I wish anyone but Baz was directing. I know how much you love "Moulin Rouge", but that still remains one of the most unpleasant movies I've ever seen. It could be my least favorite movie ever. But I hope Gatsby is good. I really mean that.

"I'm thinking of the final shot of a smiling Christopher Reeve flying over Earth in “Superman” (1978) backed by that exhilarating John Williams score. I wished “The Avengers” had ended in a similar way, something to send the audience out soaring."

I hadn't thought of that when I watched it but yes, i agree: Imagine Close Encounters, Rocky, Jaws, The Piano, Raiders Of The Lost Ark, Manhattan, The Third Man, Star Wars, Star Trek, James Bond, The Magnificent Seven, Halloween or Psycho with bland, generic, off-the-shelf music....

Frightening, isn't it?

I really enjoyed The Avengers but with a theme by John Williams (in his prime) attached it could have been one for the ages.

L. Byron, thank you for chiming in. I must admit to a mistake on my part, however, when I said the last scene of "The Avengers" consisted of a scene between Samuel L. Jackson and Cobie Smulders. I saw the film a second time and I was wrong. The last scene was actually between Robert Downey Jr. and Gwyneth Paltrow. I apologize for that. But my original argument still stands. It was still an uninspired way to end the movie.

I agree with you though, the film needed a better score. Thanks for writing.