Tuesday, May 26, 2015

As if to confirm U.S. housing starts and building permits’ jump to their highest levels in nearly 7-1/2 years, the sales rate of new single-family houses in April 2015 rose even higher at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 517,000, according to estimates released jointly today by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. “This is 6.8 percent above the revised March rate of 484,000 and is 26.1 percent above the April 2014 estimate of 410,000,” per the Census Bureau.

It means home construction is returning to pre-recession levels, as is the demand for more housing, which will spur more housing construction. The sales rate is rising fast enough to drop housing inventories to 4.6 months, at the low end of inventories.

The south was the biggest gainer, with construction up 5.8 percent. Also, the median price rose to $297,300 for a strong 8.3 percent year-on-year gain. So sales have finally reached the long term trend line, which should signal a longer term recovery as buyer’s enthusiasm tends to feed on itself, according to Behavioral Economist and Nobelist Dr. Robert Shiller.

As if to confirm the rising enthusiasm of buyers, the S&P Case-Shiller Home Price Index continued its climb to post-recession highs, with San Francisco now up 10.31 percent year over year, Denver and Dallas up 10 percent and 9.3 percent, respectively. Denver and Dallas housing prices have almost doubled since the Great Recession, per the above graph. San Francisco’s prices are just now approaching their bubble high.

“Home prices have enjoyed year-over-year gains for 35 consecutive months,” says David M. Blitzer, Managing Director & Chairman of the Index Committee for S&P Dow Jones Indices. “The pattern of consistent gains is national and seen across all 20 cities covered by the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices…”

Of course lower interest rates were also a factor, as I’ve said, with housing affordability increasing this year, according to the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Opportunity Index (HOI).

In all, 66.5 percent of new and existing homes sold between the beginning of January and end of March were affordable to families earning the U.S. median income of $65,800, said the report. “This is up from the 62.8 percent of homes sold that were affordable to median-income earners in the fourth quarter.”

What is another catalyst? Housing formation is recovering, which is largely due to Millennials moving out of their parents’ homes, or higher education venues. Based on unusually low household formation numbers of past several years, "there's a ton of people living in basements," Fundstrat Global Advisors' Tom Lee said in a recent interview with CNBC's "Trading Nation." "Two quarters of pretty decent household formation isn't getting everybody out of the basement. I think this means we have multiple years where household formations are well over 1.3 million, 1.4 million."

Household formation will be the key to future housing growth, as the millenials’ population size has now reached that of the baby boomers, their parents. And many have yet to reach home-buying age. Household formation had dipped as low as 360,000 per annum in recent years, due to the housing bust. So this is yet another sign of a growing pool of homebuyers.

Friday, May 22, 2015

U.S. housing starts jumped to their highest level in nearly 7-1/2 years in April and permits soared, hopeful signs for an economy that is struggling to regain strong momentum after a dismal first quarter. And that is exciting economists that say it could mean better economic growth ahead.

The strength in housing stands out from the weakness in consumption, business spending and manufacturing, which have prompted economists to lower their second-quarter growth estimates and raised doubts that the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates before the end of the year.

Of course lower interest rates were the main factor, as housing affordability has been increasing this year, according to the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Opportunity Index (HOI).

In all, 66.5 percent of new and existing homes sold between the beginning of January and end of March were affordable to families earning the U.S. median income of $65,800, said the report. “This is up from the 62.8 percent of homes sold that were affordable to median-income earners in the fourth quarter.

Groundbreaking for new construction surged 20.2 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual pace of 1.14 million units, the highest since November 2007, the Commerce Department said on Tuesday. The percent increase was the biggest since February 1991. March's starts were revised up to a 944,000 unit rate instead of the previously reported 926,000 unit rate.

And privately-owned housing units authorized by building permits in April were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,143,000. This is 10.1 percent above the revised March rate of 1,038,000 and is 6.4 percent above the April 2014 estimate.

"The rebound in permits points to solid starts and construction in the months ahead. After the weather-related weakness in starts during Q1, we think the April data are consistent with housing activity returning to normal," wrote Barclays economists.

For the second straight quarter, Syracuse, N.Y. remained the nation’s most affordable major housing market, as 95.6 percent of all new and existing homes sold in the first quarter of 2015 were affordable to families earning the area’s median income of $68,500. Whereas San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, Calif. was the nation’s least affordable major housing market. Just 14.1 percent of homes sold in the first quarter were affordable to families earning the area’s median income of $103,400.

So where are the signs of higher economic growth ahead? The one statistic showing strength, with the latest downturns in consumer confidence, industrial production, and retail sales is Weekly Initial Unemployment claims. These state reports aren’t guesses or projections, but actual reports from state unemployment departments.

Jobless claims are way down and are easily sending out the strongest positive signals of any indicator, employment or otherwise, claims Econoday. Claims data go all the way back to 1948 and have rarely been this low. Initial claims were last this low back in March and April 2000 when they averaged 272,500.

The current 4-week average out to May 9 is at 271,750, this at a time when the civilian labor force, at 157.1 million, is 10 percent larger than it was back in 2000. Continuing claims tell the same story, at a 15-year low of 2.229 million. The unemployment rate for insured workers is very low, at only 1.7 percent, and overall unemployment rate for nonfarm payroll workers has fallen to 5.4 percent.

So consumers have to be saving more of their increased earnings, at present. And since stocks and bond returns seem to have topped out from their multi-year rally with little room for more growth, housing has to be the one area that can play catchup.

One sign of this is evidenced by investors making more all cash purchases, of late.

And Canaccord Genuity equity strategist Tony Dwyer made a similar point Tuesday in a note to clients, writing that the "acceleration in the number of millennials turning 30 over the next six years,” in a recent CNBC interview. “... could ramp household formations," particularly given the "positive employment outlook" and "low household debt service ratio."

What is the catalyst? Housing formation is recovering, which is largely due to Millennials moving out of their parents homes, or higher education venues. Based on unusually low household formation numbers, "there's a ton of people living in basements," Fundstrat Global Advisors' Tom Lee said in a recent interview with CNBC's "Trading Nation." "Two quarters of pretty decent household formation isn't getting everybody out of the basement. I think this means we have multiple years where household formations are well over 1.3 million, 1.4 million."

Household formation had dipped as low as 360,000 per annum in recent years, due to the housing bust. Is this another sign that the housing market is finally into a sustainable growth pattern? This selling season should tell.

Unions may have been weakened by Republican efforts to abolish labor’s collective bargaining power, (in order to weaken their support of Democratic Party policies), but that may be changing as unions have found a new cause—working to raise minimum wages.

Los Angeles is the latest city to raise the minimum wage—to $15/hour in 5 years. Los Angeles is the fourth city, and by far the largest, to enact a $15 minimum in the past year, reports the New York Times. The others are Seattle, San Francisco and Emeryville, Calif. (near San Francisco). A $15 minimum has been proposed in New York City, Washington, D.C., and Kansas City, Mo.

And labor unions in the service industries are behind the push. This is exactly what unions are good at—encouraging higher wages in non-union businesses to match union benefits, such as at MacDonalds, Walmart, and even Facebook. The vote by the Los Angeles City Council was 14-1 in favor. This means it is now on the national agenda.

The $7.25/hour national minimum wage was last set in July 2009. And, according to the University of California Davis Center for Poverty Research, in 2013:

Five Southern states (Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee and South Carolina) have no minimum wage laws.

Four states (Wyoming, Minnesota, Arkansas and Georgia) have state minimum wage rates that are lower than the federal rate, so the federal minimum wage applies.

Twenty states have laws that set the minimum wage at the federal rate.

Twenty-one states and the District of Columbia set their rates higher than the federal rate. Currently the state of Washington has the highest minimum wage rate at $9.32 per hour.

Unions had been stymied by outright banning of collective bargaining, or even the requirement that members don’t have to pay dues when joining a unionized shop in many of the right to work states—25 at last count, all controlled by Republican legislatures. It is a I win-You lose bargain that Republican legislatures have made with workers in their own states. The outright suppression of workers’ wages only weakens economic growth, and indeed the reddest states with the strongest anti-union laws are also the poorest.

Several other cities, including San Francisco, Chicago, Seattle and Oakland, Calif., have already approved increases, as we said, and dozens more are considering doing the same. In 2014, a number of Republican-leaning states like Alaska and South Dakota also raised their state-level minimum wages by ballot initiative.

The 67 percent increase from the current California state minimum will be phased in over five years, first to $10.50 in July 2016, then to $12 in 2017, $13.25 in 2018 and $14.25 in 2019. Los Angeles businesses with fewer than 25 employees will have an extra year to carry out the plan. Starting in 2022, annual increases will be based on the Consumer Price Index average of the last 20 years. The LA City Council’s vote will instruct the city attorney to draft the language of the law, which will then come back to the Council for final approval.

This can only strengthen collective bargaining efforts in other states, a plus for union organizing efforts. Household incomes for most Americans have been declining since 1979. The above columns show real annual income growth from 1947-79 (blue) , and from 1979 to 2015(red) . It highlights the tremendous income inequality for the poorest Americans since then, partly due to the current national minimum wage of $7.25/hour.

“The effects here will be the biggest by far,” said Michael Reich, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley, who was commissioned by LA city leaders to conduct several studies on the potential effects of a minimum-wage increase. “The proposal will bring wages up in a way we haven’t seen since the 1960s. There’s a sense spreading that this is the new norm, especially in areas that have high costs of housing.”

The groups pressing for higher minimum wages said that the Los Angeles vote could set off a wave of increases across Southern California, and that higher pay scales would improve the way of life for the region’s vast low-wage work force. Actually, it is already happening nationally, and popular even in the right to work states that have suppressed workers’ right for so long.

The push for a $15-an-hour minimum wage is not confined to populous coastal states, said the New York Times. In Kansas City, Mo., activists recently collected enough signatures to put forward an August ballot initiative on whether to raise the minimum wage to $15 by 2020. The City Council is deliberating this week over how to respond and could pass its own measure in advance of the initiative.

Of course, there is an additional bonus to state budgets for raising the minimum wage. It takes many of those income earners at the bottom off state assistance programs like Medical, food stamps, and even welfare rolls. Why shouldn’t everyone support such a grand bargain?

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Nobelist Robert Shiller, winner of the Nobel for his research in Behavioral Economics, or the psychology that drives economic behavior, has come up with the latest reason this economic recovery has been so weak to date. GDP growth has averaged just 2 percent since the end of the Great Recession.

It has to do with what Lord JM Keynes called ‘animal spirits”, or the psychological fact that fear breeds more fear, so that it can grip a whole country, as it did during our Great Depression, and perhaps is doing so again.

“The same could be said today, seven years after the 2008 global financial crisis, about the world economy’s many remaining weak spots,” said Dr. Shiller. “Fear causes individuals to restrain their spending and firms to withhold investments; as a result, the economy weakens, confirming their fear and leading them to restrain spending further. The downturn deepens, and a vicious circle of despair takes hold. Though the 2008 financial crisis has passed, we remain stuck in the emotional cycle that it set in motion.”

In fact, over the last two decades, like that of many other developed nations, US growth rates have been decreasing. In the 50’s and 60’s the average growth rate was above 4 percent, in the 70’s and 80’s dropped to around 3 percent. In the last ten years, the average rate has been below 2 percent. But it is much more due to the fact household incomes have declined for most Americans after inflation, and so now spend more than they save to even maintain their current standard of living.

Doctor Shiller’s answer is to restart our vision of going to the moon and beyond; that is, using public spending on national projects that both inspire our body politic and restore our leadership in the sciences.

“Government-funded space-exploration programs around the world have been profound inspirations,” says Dr. Shiller. “Of course, it was scientists, not government bureaucrats, who led the charge. But such programs, whether publicly funded or not, have been psychologically transforming. People see in them a vision for a greater future. And with inspiration comes a decline in fear, which now, as in Roosevelt’s time, is the main obstacle to economic progress.”

But he doesn’t go into what may be behind the fear—what economists now call consumer confidence or sentiment. We measure confidence in particular to gauge just how Main Streeters feel about their future economic prospects for jobs and financial security. And the main determinate of their current still low confidence level has to be the fact that most Americans have not seen any change in their financial conditions for decades.

The result is record economic inequality that is plaguing growth as it did in 1929, the real cause of the Great Depression. The result of that inequality is money not flowing to where it can be spent productively and so do the most good—to consumers or government that will spend and/or invest in productive enterprises, rather than put it into tax shelters for their heirs, as most of the wealthiest seem to be doing today.

This is evidenced by the personal savings rates of the different income brackets. For instance, the wealthiest 1 percent now save more than 50 percent of their income, whereas the poorest 20 percent save none.

What do they do with their savings? Mostly hoard it. According to the new Billionaire Census from Wealth-X and UBS, the world's billionaires are holding an average of $600 million in cash each—greater than the gross domestic product of Dominica. That marks a jump of $60 million from a year ago and translates into billionaires' holding an average of 19 percent of their net worth in cash.

"The apparent safety of cash, reinforced by the painful psychological experience of the 2008-09 global financial crisis and the subsequent troubles within the European Monetary Union, likely reinforces the tendency to favor this cautious allocation strategy," said Simon Smiles, chief investment officer for Ultra High Net Worth at UBS Wealth Management.

And House Republicans are once again proposing repeal of the inheritance tax, now for the $5million in inherited wealth and above set that still have to pay it. The Center for Budget Policies and Priorities tells us the effect of this loss in taxes:

· Cost $269 billion in reduced revenues over 2016 to 2025, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), adding $320 billion to deficits when counting additional interest on the national debt.

· Do nothing for 99.8 percent of estates. Only the estates of the wealthiest 0.2 percent of Americans -- roughly 2 out of every 1,000 people who die -- owe any estate tax. This is because of the tax's high exemption amount, which has jumped from $650,000 in 2001 to $5.43 million per person (effectively $10.86 million for a couple) in 2015. Repeal would bestow a tax windfall averaging over $3 millionapiece, or more than a typical college graduate earns in a lifetime, on the roughly 5,400 wealthy estates that will owe the tax in 2016.[2] The 318 estates worth at least $50 million (some of which are worth hundreds of millions of dollars) would receive tax windfalls averaging more than $20 million each.

· Exacerbate wealth inequality, which has grown significantly in recent decades. In 2012, the wealthiest 1 percent of American families held about 42 percent of total wealth, new data show.[3] Large inheritances play a significant role in the concentration of wealth; inheritances account for about 40 percent of all household wealth and are extremely concentrated at the top. Repealing the estate tax would exacerbate wealth inequality by benefiting only the heirs of the country's wealthiest estates, who also tend to have very high incomes.[4]

It’s sad that we even need to have this argument on whether such inequality is a bad thing, given Dr. Shiller’s worries that we are re-experiencing what happened during the Great Depression.

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

As if further confirmation was needed that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were not even a minor cause of the housing bubble and consequent bust, the latest judgment against Nomura Securities for selling fraudulent mortgages to Fannie and Freddie should be icing on the cake; settlements that now total more than $14 billion in fines for almost all the major banks and lending institutions.

The charge is old. Critics, (mainly those caught selling fraudulent loans to Fannie and Freddie) have long maintained that the GSE’s encouraged too many people to buy homes by offering all manner of payment assistance, and even guaranteeing subprime mortgages from the likes of Countrywide Financial (that was subsequently bought by Bank of America).

A U.S. judge on Monday ruled that two more large financial entities, including Nomura Holdings Inc., made false statements in selling mortgage-backed securities to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ahead of the 2008 financial crisis.

U.S. District Judge Denise Cote in Manhattan ruled for the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the conservator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, in a ruling that could allow the U.S. regulator to recover around $450 million.

This is one more example of how almost all of the major financial institutions jumped on the bandwagon that encouraged the housing bubble—lending money to both qualified and unqualified borrowers and then misrepresenting their quality to the main guarantors of US housing finance.

Cote, who presided over a non-jury trial, said the FHFA was entitled to judgment against Nomura and the Royal Bank of Scotland Plc, which underwrote some of the $2 billion in mortgage-backed securities, in light of misstatements they made in offering documents.

Such originators were the real problem. Nomura Securities is just one of a growing list of mortgage lenders that have had to settle fraud charges that the loans submitted to Fannie and Freddie weren’t the quality loans they had certified—16 at last count totaling more than $14 billion in fines, as we said. Their loans had not in fact conformed or even followed Fannie and Freddie’s qualification standards, including verification of income and even whether they held real jobs, when they sought their guarantee insurance.

The result was the demonization of the GSEs as undercapitalized and incapable of fulfilling their mandate to make housing more affordable to Main Street Americans. I have been writing about the resistance of US Treasury—and maybe White House—to any recapitalization of Fannie and Freddie’s corporations to cushion them from another such housing downturn, corporations that were set up in the 1930s and 40s respectively to encourage home owning.

And in successfully fulfilling their mandate, they were a major factor in creating middle class Americans’ wealth, much of which was destroyed during the Great Recession. FDR’s Home Loan Corporation came to the rescue during the Great Depression, and we should be doing the same for housing in order to aid our recovery from the Great Recession.

Then why does Treasury, and even the White House oppose recapitalizing them, in spite of their now record-breaking profits? Because Treasury seems to believe there is a better alternative. However, that is yet to be seen and the GSEs are guaranteeing more than 60 percent of originations these days, while making the Treasury literally $$billions.

The Federal Housing and Finance Authority has just issued an update on their plans to ‘reform’ the GSEs. It is a proposal to form a Common Securitizing Platform (CSP) to replace competing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac platforms that securitize its mortgage pools.

“The objectives in developing a Single Security are to establish a single, liquid market for the mortgage-backed securities issued by both Enterprises that are backed by fixed-rate loans and to maintain the liquidity of this market over time,” says the FHFA. “Achievement of those objectives would enhance the liquidity of the TBA market and further FHFA’s statutory obligation to ensure the liquidity of the nation’s housing finance markets.”

The question then is what comes next? The Treasury says their overall objective of not recapitalizing Fannie and Freddie is to induce private originators to guarantee a larger majority of mortgages. So will Banks and other private loan originators then step up to the plate and issue pools that can be either purchased or guaranteed by the CSP, which up to now they have been reluctant to do, without the GSEs’ guarantee?

And if the Treasury dissolves the GSEs, as it says it ultimately intends in order to put, “private capital at risk ahead of taxpayers,” can private issuers of said mortgage-backed-securities be the guarantors, without substantially raising their fees and profit margins, which will raise interest rates, as well? There was a reason Fannie and Freddie conforming mortgage rates were so affordable. They had lower capitalization requirements, in part because of the superior quality of their mortgage underwriting standards, and consequent low delinquency rates.

Then who will enforce the very successful underwriting standards now required by Fannie and Freddie that has brought down the default rates close to historical standards? It is the real issue that was exposed in the lawsuits. Who will police the banks and private mortgage originators that the record shows will evade those standards when it suits them?

Thursday, May 14, 2015

We still see no signs of inflation, in spite of the oil price hikes. The latest sign is the wholesale Producer Price Index (PPI) of wholesale goods. It is down and continuing to fall, in a word. Producer prices for total final demand fell 0.4 percent in April which is far below the Econoday low estimate for minus 0.1 percent. And this isn’t a good omen for higher growth this year.

It also means the Fed may be in no hurry to raise interest rates this year at all. Or, or to sell any of the $4 trillion in securities it has purchased to keep more $$$ in circulation. Unfortunately, these $$$ are going nowhere, since they end up with those that need money the least, the top one percent income earners. The savings rate of the wealthiest is now above 50 percent, whereas that of the poorest 20 percent Quintile among US is basically down to 0 percent—that’s right, they are unable to save at all.

So now we know why the easy money Fed policies haven’t had more effect on boosting our GDP growth rate above 2 percent. In the last two decades, like that of many other developed nations, US growth rates have been decreasing. In the 50’s and 60’s the average growth rate was above 4 percent, in the 70’s and 80’s dropped to around 3 percent. In the last ten years, the average rate has been below 2 percent, in large part because household incomes have declined for most Americans that now spend more than they save to even maintain their current standard of living.

Excluding food & energy, PPI producer prices fell 0.2 percent which is below the low estimate for no change. The overall year-on-year reading is at a record low of minus 1.3 percent. So there is little US demand for the raw materials that make up PPI components, including oil and gas, at the moment. So called Final energy demand fell a steep 2.9 percent in April with the year-on-year rate at minus 24.0 percent. Gasoline prices fell 4.7 percent in the month.

Final demand for food extended its long negative run, at minus 0.9 percent with the year-on-year rate at minus 4.2 percent. Final demand for services is down 0.1 percent with the year-on-year rate one of the few readings in the plus column, at 0.9 percent which nevertheless is well below the Fed's general inflation target of 2.0 percent.

Is this just from the winter freeze and tornadoes that have hit the South and Midwest? Or, will it be necessary to find other ways to put some of those savings to work to repair our ageing infrastructure that would boost our growth rate, and keep government solvent?

Wednesday, May 13, 2015

We believe housing construction is about to bloom this spring, due to growing employment. For starters, an additional 45,000 construction jobs were added to nonfarm payrolls in April. This is even though construction spending to date has been flat, according to the Commerce Department. The U.S. Census Bureau of the Department of Commerce announced that construction spending during March 2015 was estimated at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $966.6 billion, 0.6 percent below the revised February estimate of $972.9 billion. But the March figure is 2.0 percent above the March 2014 estimate of $947.3 billion.

And sales of new single-family houses in March 2015 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 481,000, according to estimates by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which is slow because of winter weather, but it is still 19.4 percent above last year’s March 2014 estimate of 403,000.

And, housing units authorized by building permits in March were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,039,000, 5.7 percent below the revised February rate of 1,102,000, but is 2.9 percent above the March 2014 estimate of 1,010,000, signaling more construction ahead. And the single-family component is up 4.4 percent from February, which is double the multi-family component. Single family construction employs many more workers per unit.

This is while overall employment could be returning to pre-recession levels, as we said last week. The U.S. churned out 223,000 new jobs in April, and the unemployment rate slid to 5.4 percent from 5.5 percent, which means the US economy’s deep freeze was temporary. It was a short hibernation, in a word, but we are still not out of the Great Recession woods, as we said last week.

The Small Business Optimism Index also increased 1.7 points from March to 96.9, reports the NFIB, with the employment component especially strong. Small business does 50 percent of all hiring, so this is another sign of a healthy jobs market. Twenty-seven percent of all owners reported job openings they could not fill in the current period, up 3 points from March. And a net 11 percent plan to create new jobs, up 1 point and a solid reading.

Lastly, the Labor Department’s most recent JOLTS report showed 5 million job openings, and a higher Quits rate, meaning more workers were able to quit their current job to find a better position. Quits are up 14 percent year-over-year. These are voluntary separations, as we said (see light blue columns at bottom of graph for trend for "quits"), and the number of job openings are up 19 percent YoY, which is another sign of a robust jobs market.

The bottom line is housing construction should begin to expand in the spring and summer. This will ultimately relieve the problem of lack of inventory, and should help first time homebuyers by relieving price pressures that have been increasing as housing stocks have declined.

Friday, May 8, 2015

Today’s unemployment report is gangbusters, as I predicted, with employment returning to pre-recession levels. The U.S. churned out 223,000 new nonfarm payroll jobs in April, which means the US economy’s winter deepfreeze was temporary, but we are still not out of the Great Recession woods.

This is because rising inflation will become a factor as business activity picks up, and that will call for a premature rise in interest rates that Chairwoman Yellen and her Fed Governors have to resist. For history shows that a sustained and historic GDP growth rate of 3 percent and higher can only be achieved with inflation above 2 percent, the Fed’s target inflation rate. The “target rate” is a rather meaningless term, since it merely means the Fed has to begin to consider when it may have to raise interest rates as a hedge against future inflation.

Why do we need 3 percent GDP growth? It has been just 2 percent on average really since 2000. We can’t even approach full employment; much less raise wages enough to bring back some semblance of a middle class, otherwise. In fact, there is very little of the middle class left in terms of earning power, with average household incomes still stuck at 1970’s levels when inflation is accounted for.

Most major segments of the economy except for the energy industry added workers last month, with government finally beginning to hire back some of the 600,000 jobs lost during the Great Recession. The unemployment rate sank to 5.4 percent from 5.5 percent, the lowest level since mid-2008.

And stocks are rallying with the DOW up more than 200 points, so fears of slowing growth from last month’s ultra-low job creation numbers were overstated. What’s more, the number of people who entered the labor force in search of work also rose, a sign jobs are easier to find. The Labor Department’s separate JOLTS report also showed 5.13 million job openings in February, an all-time high.

American workers hourly pay barely rose above inflation, however. The average pay of employees rose 0.1 percent in April to $24.87 an hour, and rose 2.2 percent over the past 12 months. But this still isn’t enough to boost GDP growth higher. Wages and salaries have to rise to 3 percent annually to bring back a historical growth rate of 3 percent plus that economists are predicting for the rest of 2015.

The CPI inflation Rate in the United States averaged 3.33 percent from 1914 until 2015, says Trading Economics, reaching an all-time high of 23.70 percent in June of 1920 and a record low of -15.80 percent in June of 1921. And it has to reach the historical average to bring back historical growth.

That is most crucial. For it will take a very accommodative Fed policy under Chairwoman Yellen to make that happen. It also means the inflation rate itself will have to rise to at least 3 percent for wages to rise faster. And the bond vigilantes will begin to scream as soon as inflation even reaches 2 percent.

So Yellen and the Fed Governors must continue to maintain low enough interest rates to allow for a higher inflation rate. The greatest fear from the current slow growth seems to be that of small businesses that comprise some 50 percent of private sector jobs, as reported by the National Federation of Independent Business.

“Overall the economy will keep moving forward, but more like a turtle than a hare. Bad weather was certainly depressing and Washington politics remains focused on issues that have little bearing on the current economy,” said Bill Dunkelberg, NFIB Chief Economist

The bottom line is there are more available job openings than ever, and wages and salaries are beginning to grow above the inflation rate. This is a sure sign of a virtuous circle. But policy makers have to allow prices to rise enough to increase business profits above and beyond the inflation rate. This is how economies growth, as I said in our last column.

Thursday, May 7, 2015

Last week, the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee, headed by Texas Republican Lamar Smith, approved a bill that would slash at least three hundred million dollars from NASA’s earth-science budget, says the New Yorker’s Elizabeth Colbert. “Earth science, of course, includes climate science,” Representative Eddie Bernice Johnson, a Texas Democrat who is also on the committee, noted. (Smith said that the White House’s NASA budget request favored the earth sciences “at the expense of the other science divisions and human and robotic space exploration.”)

This is just the Republican’s latest effort to cut more funding from those government agencies that provide climate data to help us predict all kinds of natural disasters, such as hurricanes and tornadoes. Have they forgotten Hurricanes Sandy, or Katrina, or the record number of tornadoes that have hit the Midwest and South? House Republicans are now passing bills that are dangerous to everyone’s health, in a word.

It is becoming more obvious why the Republican Party have been so anti-science; in fact anti-all scientific research. It enables them to deny any reality that will decrease the profits of their supporters, such as the Koch Brothers with a net worth of $100 billion, no matter the danger to the environment. They have been denying climate change of any kind in order not to have to put CO2 scrubbers on their power plants that emit so much heat.

Representative Johnson tried to get the cuts eliminated from the bill, but her proposed amendment was rejected. Defunding NASA’s earth-science program takes willed ignorance one giant leap further, says Colbert. It means that not only will climate studies be ignored; but weather data won’t be collected that helps to predict the increasing number of natural disasters.

It takes Republicans’ efforts to dumb down their electorate to a whole new level. Their intentions were first apparent when Wisconsin’s Tea Party Governor Scott Walker recently proposed turning the University of Wisconsin into a trade school, after the Republican-led legislature banned collective bargaining of school teachers, in an effort to dumb down their public educational system.

His latest salvo was directed at the University of Wisconsin. He proposed not only to cut its budget, but proposed downsizing its mission from that of higher education to supply more workers, whoever they might be. Walker’s new budget proposal would slash $300 million from the University of Wisconsin system over the next two years. That’s a 13 percent reduction in state funding.

The vote on the NASA bill came just a week after the same House committee approved major funding cuts to the National Science Foundation’s geosciences program, as well as cuts to Department of Energy programs that support research into new energy sources. As Michael Hiltzik, a columnist for the Los Angeles Times, noted, the committee is “living down to our worst expectations.”

This willful ignorance of anything scientific endangers much more than our health and worsening environment. It endangers all scientific research—solely in order to protect the profits of their wealthiest supporters.

The practical implications of the proposed cuts are certainly disturbing. (It’s going to be hard for D.O.E. to find new energy sources if it isn’t even looking for them.) But perhaps even more distressing is the mindset that led to them. The “I’m not a scientist” line that all Republican candidates to date have espoused is basically a declaration of willed ignorance, said Colbert.

It highlights the dangers that such an agenda presents not only to scientific research, but to the health and well being of all Americans.

Tuesday, May 5, 2015

It looks like the April unemployment report out on Friday could be gangbusters. Not only because U.S. winters have been so severe of late, and job formation abnormally low. But because manufacturing jobs in particular are returning to US.

Sixty thousand manufacturing jobs were added in the U.S. in 2014, versus 12,000 in 2003, reports Marketwatch, either through so-called reshoring, in which American companies bring jobs back to the U.S., or foreign direct investment, in which foreign companies move production to the U.S., according to a study from the Reshoring Initiative. In contrast, as many as 50,000 jobs were “offshored” last year, a decline from about 150,000 in 2003.

One reason is our increased cost competitiveness, with lower oil and gas prices reducing energy costs, and wages rising in Asia as their consumers move into the middle class. Also our booming service sector—April’s ISM non-manufacturing index just rose to 57.8 from 56.5 percent—has increased our demand for goods and services. These are service sector products and services that can only be consumed domestically, and so durable goods made for them would be cheaper if produced closer to home, with the aforementioned factors.

New Orders are very strong, at 59.2, as are backlog orders, at 54.5 which is unusually strong for this reading. Strong orders point to future hiring which is already very strong, at 56.7. The percentages are a measure of optimism or pessimism. When more than 50 percent of respondents report positive results in all these areas, then service sector is expanding.

Among the world’s top 10 export economies, the U.S. last year ranked No. 2 — behind only China — for cost competitiveness, according to the Boston Consulting Group, with real estate and natural gas and other energy prices tending to apply downward cost pressure in the U.S.

CEO Jeff Immelt of GE has said the U.S., on a relative basis, has never been more competitive. For instance, he’s said it takes three hours or less to make a refrigerator, so the total cost can be lower to have it made domestically versus in China or Mexico when factoring in other costs including transportation.

Secondly, the Labor Department’s latest JOLTS report showed the highest number of job openings since January 2001. The latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey reported 5.13 million job openings in February,

The number of job openings (yellow) is up 23 percent year-over-year compared to February 2014. Quits are up 10 percent year-over-year. These are voluntary separations. (see light blue columns at bottom of graph for trend for "quits"). It means an improving jobs market, since workers are increasingly willing to leave their current jobs for better jobs elsewhere.

The employment picture is also better with small business that creates a majority of domestic jobs, as the NFIB, National Federation of Independent Businesses, have reported steadily increased employment in 2014, though 2015 is showing a slight drop in business optimism, probably due again to winter.

The net percent of owners reporting an increase in employment fell 5 percentage points to a net negative 1 percent of owners, said the NFIB, down substantially from the recent high of 9 percent in December 2014. Fifty percent reported hiring or trying to hire (down 3 points), but 42 percent reported few or no qualified applicants for the positions they were trying to fill.

Ten percent reported using temporary workers, down 2 points. Twenty-four percent of all owners reported job openings they could not fill in the current period, down 5 points from February which was the highest reading since March, 2006. A net 10 percent planning to create new jobs, down 2 points but a solid reading.

“Overall the economy will keep moving forward, but more like a turtle than a hare. Bad weather was certainly depressing and Washington politics remains focused on issues that have little bearing on the current economy,” said Bill Dunkelberg, NFIB Chief Economist

The bottom line is there are more available job openings than ever, and wages and salaries are beginning to grow above the inflation rate. This is a sure sign of a virtuous circle. Increased household incomes means more demand for products, which creates more jobs, which in turn creates even more demand. This is how economies growth.

Saturday, May 2, 2015

David Brook’s most recent New York Times Oped talks about the dissolution of social bonds in Baltimore neighborhoods. “Even in poorest Baltimore, there once were informal rules of behavior governing how cops interacted with citizens,” he says in quoting The Wire Producer David Simon, an awarding winning TV series of life in a Baltimore ghetto: “…that’s happened across many social spheres…in schools, families and among neighbors. Individuals are left without the norms that middle-class people take for granted.”

The problem is there is no longer a majority of the middle class, which has been decimated most recently by the busted housing bubble, but over a much longer period by the loss of those jobs dominating the post WWII economy that migrated overseas and blighted cities and even suburbs as a consequence.

And without a substantial middle class, those middle class norms will no longer regulate social behavior. The result of no accepted social norms is social chaos, as we have been seeing in the riots, hence the bullying tactics of police against those most affected by the loss of jobs and educational opportunities in trying to restore a semblance of order, the poorest among us.

In fact, the Baltimore riots are the result of an economic system that can only be described as broken, where the bullies win, everyone else loses. We are living the result of economic and political policies that have created the greatest income inequality since 1929 and the Great Depression. Yet no one, including David Brooks, wants to face that fact.

Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century, described the result of such inequality in earlier centuries, such as Europe’s pre-WWI Belle Epoque era, where inherited wealth was the main path to upward mobility, and Oligarchies ruled.

The U.S. path to such inequality was the concerted push of Big Business and Wall Street to weaken labor laws and trade treaties that allowed American businesses to both automate the workplace and move many jobs overseas, well documented by Jacob S. Hacker and Paul Pierson’s Winner Take All Politics, How Washington Made the Rich Richer—and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. Those jobs, the core of middle class incomes of the 1960s and 70s, went to foreign lands where costs were cheaper and labor laws nonexistent. The result since then has been stagnant or shrinking household incomes for everyone but the top income brackets that rely on capital gains and stock options, or gaming the financial system.

The epidemic of police killings of African American males is just the result. It is plain for all to see, whether in Ferguson, where the best blue collar jobs now belong to law enforcement with the closing of several auto factories, and the police force is more than 80 percent white, wherever poverty has become endemic. "It's a shortage of everything," said Shermale Humphrey, a 21-year-old who joined the protests in a recent LA Times article. "It's a shortage of jobs. Of African Americans on the police force and in government. Of people not being able to get a good education."

It is a bully mentality that has permeated our government, as well, where education spending has been cut drastically, which hurt the Ferguson school system, in particular. One reason why many families moved to these suburbs in the first place was a decent school system, better than in downtown St. Louis. However, two north county districts — including the one where Michael Brown graduated from high school in May — have lost their state accreditation in recent years. The district Ferguson shares with a neighboring town remains accredited but scores low on state tests.

Since 2000, the median household income in Ferguson has fallen by 30 percent when adjusted for inflation, to about $36,000, said the LA Times. In the census tract where Michael Brown lived, median income is less than $27,000. Just half of the adults work, yet benefits such as food stamps have been cut drastically.

All of these cutbacks in government spending in particular, and not just due to the Great Recession, has weakened our own economy considerably and delayed a full recovery from the Great Recession. Measures such as TARP and ARRA that saved many banks and stimulated economic growth until 2010, were terminated when anti-government conservatives took over Congress and did everything they could to lower taxes on the wealthiest, starving government programs of funding necessary to revive economic growth.

Ferguson and now the Baltimore riots exemplify what has happened to the lower economic classes. For U.S. economic growth has gradually declined since the 1980s, in particular, when maximum income tax brackets first declined from 70 to 40 percent, and the policies of those who intone ‘Government is the Problem’ have eroded the rights and wealth of the majority of Americans.

Whether it is instituting right to work laws in those states that have lowered incomes by blocking collective bargaining and discouraging union organizing, or unlimited campaign financing that enhances the power of corporations, or restricting Obamacare in those states that won’t set up their own exchanges for the poorest, these policies have weakened our own economic system, so much so that social chaos has resulted.

That is why such middle class values that are based in large part on financial stability are no longer the norm. The huge transfer of wealth that began in the 1980s, and the wholesale deregulation of industries that accompanied the transfer, has allowed U.S. corporations to hire and fire as they please, generating record profits, without passing on some of the benefits to their employees. It has destroyed the middle class and all it stood for.

Harlan Russell Green, Editor/Publisher

Harlan Green is a Mortgage Broker in Santa Barbara, California since the 1980s and economist. As Editor/Publisher of PopularEconomics.com, he has published 3 weekly columns-- Popular Economics Weekly, Financial FAQs, and The Mortgage Corner-since 2000, and is a featured business columnist for Huffington Post. Please refer to the populareconomics.com website for further information.