We hate logic

InsaneBoredGame99th percentile

InsaneBoredGame joined on Aug 26th, 2010,
since that has made 858 posts that are still
accessible today, 15 of which are threads. Helping
shape the community, InsaneBoredGame has given 1078 upvotes, and was last online on Dec 5th, 2017.

In Fate/Grand Order

Ah yes fgo, the bane of my existence, the taker of my monies
Sorry, this media content cannot be displayed.

@DarkChaplain I have read, I have acknowledged. The thing is that I believe, given GamerGate's power structure, the only thing that can speak for it as a movement, is the tweet that made it.

Otherwise, the whole "this isn't a harassment campaign" is about as reliable as the people who post rape and death threats in the hashtag.

Given that it's a mass of individuals, where there is complete refusal to exhibit any kind of control, one cannot acertain any kind of common ideals outside the first tweet. You can't declare who is and who isn't an "Actual Gate" unless if you judge by that first tweet.

You speak of moving on, but the truth is that you have moved on. The people who agree with you have moved on. The people who posted that they moved on have moved on.

I beat the dead horse as often as the whole "Not an Actual Gater" thing.

There is a definite problem with the power structure, and until you can find a way to clear that up everywhere, police and force the doxxers and harassers out of your movement, it's going to be continually filled with misogyny.

Because yeah, you can say that they're not part of GamerGate but the way things are, it's simply your words against theirs.

To speak of more recent incidents, let's talk about Felicia Day. She was doxxed for speaking out against GamerGate so one can only assume that the doxxers considered themselves part of GamerGate. And why not?

The only solid requirements seem to be "something something journalism ethics" and the use of the hashtag. Yes, I've seen the "I support" picture, but once again, you can't really use it to define the whole movement.

I repeat and I'll repeat it again. It's easier to say we aren't misogynistic because you personally aren't misogynistic that confront the whole problem over there.

And for the ethics thing, I believe that I've made my opinions clear on that. Simply put, I don't care. I don't care about the gamer identity and I sure as hell don't care about clickbait.

I see GamerGate as inherently sexist and thus I'm against it. It's as simple as that.

That said, this is your thread DC and I'll respect your wishes. I'll be bowing out of this thread.