https://www.ureka.org/file/all?offset=12
https://www.ureka.org/file/view/20742/a-world-without-cancer-pt-1-g-edward-griffin-full-bookSat, 24 Oct 2015 15:58:50 +0100https://www.ureka.org/file/view/20742/a-world-without-cancer-pt-1-g-edward-griffin-full-book
WORLD WITHOUT CANCER explores the revolutionary concept that cancer is a deficiency disease, like scurvy or pellagra, aggravated by the lack of an essential food compound in modern man's diet. That substance is vitamin B17. But in its concentrated and purified form developed specifically for cancer therapy, it is known as Laetrile, the controversial chemical that currently is banned in the United States. The story presented in this book does not carry the approval of orthodox medicine. The Food and Drug Administration, The American Cancer Society, and The American Medical Association have labeled it fraud and quackery. Yet the evidence is overwhelming that here, at last, is the final answer to the cancer riddle. Why has orthodox medicine waged war against this non-drug approach? The author contends that the answer is strictly political and is based upon the economic and power goals of those who control the medical establishment. WORLD WITHOUT CANCER blazes the trail into previously unexplored territory and reveals a shocking picture of how science has been subverted to protect entrenched commercial and political interests. It contains the kind of explosive impact that could topple an empire. And perhaps it will.

G. Edward Griffin is well known because of his unique talent for researching obscure and difficult topics and then presenting them in clear, concise terms that all can understand. He is the author of numerous documentary books and films on such diversified and controversial topics as the United Nations, the Supreme Court, U.S. foreign policy, The John Birch Society, the Communist Party, international banking, and now the science and politics of cancer therapy. He is a graduate of the University of Michigan where he majored in speech and communications. He has spent most of his life in various aspects of radio, TV, and motion picture production. Currently Mr. Griffin is president of a publishing and audio-visual production company in Southern California.]]>ura soulhttps://www.ureka.org/file/view/17518/unlawful-killing-documentary-into-the-death-of-diana-by-keith-allenSun, 19 Jul 2015 22:41:54 +0100https://www.ureka.org/file/view/17518/unlawful-killing-documentary-into-the-death-of-diana-by-keith-allen
A documentary about the allegedly conspiratorial killing of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Fayed]]>ura soulhttps://www.ureka.org/file/view/17516/we-are-policed-by-consent-in-britainSun, 19 Jul 2015 20:29:35 +0100https://www.ureka.org/file/view/17516/we-are-policed-by-consent-in-britain
ura soulhttps://www.ureka.org/file/view/10108/notice-rejection-of-smart-metersTue, 16 Dec 2014 21:47:48 +0000https://www.ureka.org/file/view/10108/notice-rejection-of-smart-meters
many points are documented here as cause for rejection of so called 'smart' meters.]]>ura soulhttps://www.ureka.org/file/view/8456/how-evidence-based-medical-science-ended-water-fluoridation-in-the-netherlands-2013Wed, 16 Jul 2014 22:37:02 +0100https://www.ureka.org/file/view/8456/how-evidence-based-medical-science-ended-water-fluoridation-in-the-netherlands-2013
double blind testing showed fluoride to be harmful and cause eczema, allergic responses and other debilitating imbalances in the body.

This is a summary of information complied from public record and published peerreviewed journals on the history of fluoridation in the Netherlands. It explains howmedical based science resulted in the termination of fluoridation in this Country,thanks largely to Dr. Hans Moolenburgh, a Medical Physician, Cancer Specialist andClinical Ecologist who along with a team of medical doctors and medical researchersconclusively demonstrated that fluoridation of drinking water resulted in thepopulation being subjected to low grade poisoning by fluoride with wide rangingmedical side effects.Hans C. Moolenburgh, M.D., graduated as a medical doctor from the University ofLeyden in 1952. He was a general practitioner in the city of Haarlem in theNetherlands since April 1953. Apart from being a G.P., his main interests wereclinical ecology and complementary forms of cancer treatment.Dr. Moolenbuurgh wrote three books on the subject of fluoridation. Two of these arein Dutch: "Fluoridering van het leidingwater," 1973 and "Fluor Liever niet" in 1990.The third book is in English: "Fluoride, the Freedom Fight," 1987. Dr. Moolenburghwas actively involved in the campaign to end fluoridation in the Netherlands andspent many years researching the science surrounding fluoridation.In 1952, Dutch health authorities, following the lead of the United States, beganfluoridating the public water supply in the city of Tiel with Culemborg as the controlcity.In 1971, Dr. Moolenburgh documented the first fluoride victim in Holland during theHaarlem hearings regarding fluoridation. The case involved a baby boy from nearbyfluoridated Velsen who had breathing troubles since birth. When the child was 6months old, he was brought to Dr. Moolenburgh for treatment and was completelycured in one week of its ailment simply by removing exposure to fluoride in thedrinking water.1On March 20th, 1972, the city of Amsterdam began fluoridating its water supplies.This had a widespread effect on surrounding communities who derived their drinkingwater from the Amsterdam water suppliers, such as Heemstede, Bennebroek,Hoofddorp, Haarlemmerliede and many others. Dr. Moolenburgh found himself in aunique position to study the effects of fluoridation first hand, as half of his practicelay in Heemstede (fluoridated) and the other half in Haarlem (non-fluoridated). As hehad already extensively studied the possible side-effects of fluoridated water from themainly American literature, Dr. Moolenburgh was on the lookout for changes in themorbidity pattern in his practice. According to Dr. Moolenburgh it soon becameapparent that the extensive American data showing adverse effects were accurate.“The adverse health effects began almost at once, with people, especially children,developing colicky pains. The parents of these children often did not even know that1Moolenburgh H. Fluoride: the freedom fight. Edinburgh: Mainstream Publishing; 1987. p.46-7.How Evidence based Medical Science ended 2013Water Fluoridation in the Netherlands.their water supplies were fluoridated. These sudden changes only took place influoridated Heemstede, and the cure was easy: non-fluoridated water. This cure wasshown repeatedly to be the correct one, as parents made errors with the jerrycans ofnon-fluoridated water. As soon as fluoridated water was given, be it only one cup, thesensitive children began to yell again. This was particularly stressful in babies, whooften yelled through the whole night. Other early symptoms were the small ulcers inthe mouth called stomatitis aphtosa. I also saw how children with a known allergiccondition that had been under control, such as children with atopic eczema, suddenlysaw a return of their complaints.”2Based upon this experience in his own practice, Dr. Moolenburgh organized a groupof practitioners and researchers to study the effects of fluoridation on health. All thedoctors came from fluoridated communities and many did not believe in the existenceof the side-effects, as the health authorities had emphatically denied their existence. Inaddition to the original 12 physicians practicing in Haarlem and some of itssurrounding fluoridated areas, various individuals with training in biology, chemistry,and neurology also participated in the above study.After un-blinded tests on skeptical General Practitioners which showed negativehealth effects (similar to low-grade poisoning), to evaluate our initial findings theyconducted a double-blind experiment:"To obtain unassailable proof that nothing but fluoride in the water was responsibleand that the ill effects were not imaginary, Dr. Moolenburgh's group turned to adouble blind procedure. A cooperating pharmacist prepared eight numbered bottles ofdrinking water, some with fluoride, some without. Only the pharmacist knew whichones contained fluoride. The numbers, placed in a sealed envelope, were sent to thegroup's attorney. Patients who had recovered from side effects after changing to non-fluoridated water drank daily, one liter of water from one of the bottles given to them.If symptoms occurred, the number of the bottle was sent to the attorney in a sealedenvelope. Only after all the envelopes were received were they opened in the presenceof witnesses to avoid any possibility of bias. These tests proved that fluoridated watercaused the side effects we had identified, and the results have been published.3After several months of careful study, the group began to grasp the full importance ofthe problem. The difficulty at first was that each symptom in itself could beinterpreted as a normal illness. Only a combination of symptoms (e.g. colicky pains,small ulcers and blurred vision) pointed in the true direction. The list of the mostcommon complaints we could readily identify with the exposure to fluoridationincludes;

A definite relationship between the symptoms and fluoride in water was clearlyestablished."4The clinical results observed by Dr Moolenburgh and his team confirmed the studiesundertaken by Dr. Waldbott and Dr. Petraborg and well as Dr. Feltman and KoselB.S., M.S, which also confirmed that fluoride in drinking water caused medicalailments within the community 5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18According to Dr. Moolenburgh “in each of the many cases of adverse fluoridereaction identified, changing to non-fluoridated water cured the complaints. When4Excerpt from Fluoride, Volume 21, No. 3, page 109-112Waldbott GL. Chronic fluorine intoxication from drinking water. International Archives ofAllergy and Applied Immunology 7 70-74 1955.6 Waldbott GL. Incipient fluorine intoxication from drinking water. Acta MedicaScandinavica 156 157-168 I956.7 Waldbott GL. Urinary fluoride and calcium excretion in persons suspected of fluorideintolerance. Henry Ford Hospital Medical Bulletin 5 259-268 December 1957.8 Waldbott GL. Symposium on the non-skeletal phase of chronic fluorosis. Fluoride 9 5-81976.9 WaIdbott GL. Fluoride in Clinical Medicine. International. Archives of Allergy and AppliedImmunology 20 Suppl 1 1962.10 Waldbott GL. Incipient chronic fluoride intoxication from drinking water. II. Distinctionbetween allergic reactions and drug intolerance. International Archives of Allergy andApplied Immunology 9:241-249 1956.11 Waldbott GL, Cecilioni VA. "Neighborhood" fluorosis. Clinical Toxicology 2 387-396December 1969.12 Shea JJ, Gillespie SM, Waldbott GL. Allergy to fluoride. Annals of Allergy 25 388-391July 1967.13 Waldbott GL. Allergic reactions to fluoride. Journal of Asthma Research 2 51-64September I964.14 Waldbott GL. Tetaniform convulsions precipitated by fluoridated drinking water. ConfiniaNeurologica 17 339-347 1957.15 Waldbott GL. Urticaria due to fluoride. Acta Allergologica 13 456-468 1959.16 Petraborg HT. Chronic fluoride intoxication from drinking water (Preliminary Report).Fluoride 7 47-52 1974.17 Petraborg HT. Hydrofluorosis in the fluoridated Milwaukee area. Fluoride 10 165-1691977.18 Feltman and Kosel, Prenatal and Postnatal ingestion of fluorides, Fourteen years ofinvestigation, Final Report, Journal of Dental Medicine, Vol 16. No 4, 19615How Evidence based Medical Science ended 2013Water Fluoridation in the Netherlands.fluoridated water was returned, the complaints returned. After several months a newand disturbing complaint was added to these: joint pains. While the other complaintscould be cured in two or three days with non-fluoridated water, the joint complaintstook several weeks to some months of non-fluoridated water to clear up.”“Through continued study and research”, Dr. Moolenburgh observed “we nowunderstand that what we have been studying is not an allergy for the fluoride ion aswe had first thought, but an intoxication from the highly toxic fluorides that had beenadded to the water supplies. It is well known that sensitivity to poisons can vary fromperson to person, and that this variation is quite extensive. In an allergy, an increaseddose of the irritating substance will still only give symptoms, perhaps increased inseverity, in those allergic to it. In a poison, a small dose will give complaints in themore sensitive persons. In the case of fluoride, research shows that to include about5% of the population. With increasing doses more and more people will fall ill, andwhen the dose is high enough everyone will be ill, with perhaps the most sensitivepersons already dead or dying. As a summary of our research, we are now convincedthat fluoridation of the water supplies causes a low grade intoxication of the wholepopulation, with only the approximately 5% most sensitive persons showing acutesymptoms. The whole population being subjected to low grade poisoning means thattheir immune systems are constantly overtaxed. With all the other poisonousinfluences in our environment, this can hasten health calamities. It is in the light ofthis constant low grade poisoning that the substantial evidence of increased cancerdeath rate due to fluoridation needs to be considered and understood.”In conclusion, Dr. Moolenburgh stated under oath that “It is my considered scientificopinion, and I speak in the name of my colleagues who joined in this research, thatthe fluoridation of water supplies gives a significant immuno suppression of thewhole population subject to it, and is one of the important precursors of thecivilization illnesses that are rampant in modern industrialized society. It is my bestscientific judgement, made with a high degree of scientific certainty, that fluoridateddrinking water is very dangerous to the health of those who drink it.” 19Following publication of their research results water fluoridation in Holland wasdiscontinued in 1976.In a recent letter published in the journal ‘Fluoride’ Dr. Moolenburgh observed “as a84-year-old physician with 54 years in medical practice, who also lived through theGerman occupation of Holland during WW II and saw what totalitarian thinking leadsto in the end. When the fluoridating authorities finally begin to realize thatfluoridation was founded on a hill of sand, they will behave like little children whenthe incoming tide demolishes their seaside sand constructions. They will shut theireyes and protest, “No, this cannot be!” Public health authorities should only beinterested in promoting good health and preventing human suffering. Yet, from theiractions, they appear more concerned with adhering to erroneous dogmatic thinkingand maintaining their own positions and power. Discussion and debate with fluoride19Affidavit Of Hans C. Moolenburgh, M.D. Circuit Court of Wisconsin, Fond Du LacCounty, Case No. 92 cv 579, March 1993How Evidence based Medical Science ended 2013Water Fluoridation in the Netherlands.promoters is useless and a waste of time. Just as happened in Holland and throughoutmost of Europe, authorities who try to suppress unwelcome facts about fluoridationwill be eventually be swept away in response to compelling evidence and massivepublic indignation.”20It is lamentable that in 2013, as Ireland holds the presidency of the Council of theEuropean Union, that the Republic of Ireland, alone within Europe, continues tosupport the mass medication of its population using untested industrial chemicals thatare known to cause harm to human health and the environment.Given the considerable amount of information available there is no doubt but that thepublic health authorities as well as the political establishment in Ireland (as well as inthe other few remaining countries that still support fluoridation) have utterly failed toundertake a proper medical or scientific due diligence to protect their citizens fromunnecessary harm, that may result from supporting what can only be described as a‘blunt totalitarian policy’ mandating the mass medication of entire populations withuntested chemicals being added to public drinking water.Medical policy should be based on medical facts, and the facts clearly show thatfluoridation of drinking water is neither safe nor sustainable.20Published Letter by Dr Moolenburgh to the editor, Fluoride 43(1)81–84 January-March 2010.

this is allegedly a cia / government training manual (circa 1950s) that has accidentally been accessed by those outside the agencies, which describes ways to control and enslave entire societies.

\r\n

the basic premise is that economic theory can be translated directly to fit the same equations that are used in electrical engineering and physical mechanics. the document then combines this idea with a heartless and cold definition of humanity as being largely ignorant, greedy and un-evolved - thus they/we/you are identified as needing to be 'managed' through creation of war, genocide and slavery ("benevolent slavery and genocide" - a quote from the document).

\r\n

the methodology of enslavement includes the description of the use of politicians as tools of manipulation & distraction.