Conclusion: Why did Jane Eyre choose Saul of Tarsus rather than St. John the Divine?

[Part VI of "Rochester vs. St. John Rivers: or why Jane Eyre preferred a cynical sinner to a religious zealot." All page and chapter references are to the Penguin Classic edition of the novel which contains an introduction and notes by Michael Mason.]

redeemed sinner was worth as much to a Wesleyian as a
righteous zealot. Rochester loved and needed Jane. St. John
Rivers did not love Jane, and only needed her as a
secretary. Jane was rewarded for her absolute faith in God's
work. Was not St. Paul the man who brought the story of
Jesus to the Gentiles? Had not Wesley openly acknowledged
his debt to a feminine thinker Antionette Bouigignon, who
had written "the love of God, outside of which there is no
virtue". Brontë wrote with a sense of mission. Indeed,
Brontë's first biographer, Mrs Gaskell, recalled
being told by her that she always wrote "with a sense of
mission". In Jane Eyre, this sense burns through
almost every page. The novel Jane Eyre, regardless of
personal predilection, is one that should at least be
considered amongst religious works. Whatever the literary
value by which it is judged, it is certainly not as spiteful
triumphalist a book as that which describes the progress of
a man called Pilgrim.

References

Charlotte Brontë, Jane Eyre, Penguin, 1996.

The actual full title of the novel's manuscript was Jane Eyre: An Autobiography, edited by Currer Bell. The gender of the author was deliberately left ambivalent. The reason may become apparent during the reading of this article.