Did Mandela sell us black people out?

17 November 2011, 13:21

When former President Nelson Mandela’s wife, Winnie,
reportedly said
in an interview with The London Evening Standard newspaper in March last
year that the old man “had let us [black people] down” and that he apparently
agreed to a bad deal for us black people and that nothing seems to have changed
as “economically, we [black] are still on the outside” and that “the economy is
very much white” – many people said that was not true. But come on, really?
What has changed anyway?

Ever since Winnie denied granting the
newspaper’s journalist, Nadira Naipaul, an interview – allegations that journo repudiated,
saying Winnie was not telling the truth in an interview
with City Press newspaper – not much has been said or rather, interrogated
as to whether Mandela indeed did sell us out black people during the negotiated
settlement with the apartheid government or not. Nothing, or at least not to my
expectation.

Assuming what Winnie said was true, if not close to the
truth, I agree with her that Mandela had indeed “had let us [black people]
down”. What is worse is that even after he had left the presidency, taken over
by former President Thabo Mbeki and now by Jacob Zuma, I still think that many
of us black people have even been let down worse than we were by Mandela
himself. I also believe that, yes, the economy is still in the minority (white
people) and that will continue to be like that until…

But of course this was before she denied the allegation in an
interview or
having agreed to it or denying having had any interview with Naipaul that “had
caused so much confusion” in the country with the ruling African
National Congress, of which Mandela is still a member, saying at the time it
was still to verify “exactly what [she] said”. And it was only on her return
from the US
that Winnie denied
granting Naipaul an interview as had been reported.

Winnie denied what Naipaul claimed she said in an interview
with The Evening Standard newspaper, saying the alleged
interview was “an inexplicable attempt to undermine the unity of my family, the
legacy of Nelson Mandela and the high regard with which the name Mandela is
held here and across the globe”. Writing in the
Sunday Times denying allegations that she told
The Evening Standard newspaper that she said “This name Mandela is an albatross
around the necks of my family”, that we “all must realise that Mandela was not
the only man who suffered”; that “there were many others, hundreds who
languished in prison and died” and that “many unsung and unknown heroes of the
struggle, and there were others in the leadership too, like poor Steve Biko,
who died of the beatings, horribly all alone” – Winnie “categorically” denied
this as “completely false”. She said she “gave no interview of any kind to Ms
Naipaul” and that it was “therefore not necessary for me to respond to the
far-fetched content of a fabricated interview”.

According to the foreign
newspaper Winnie is quoted as saying Mandela “did go to prison and he went
in there as a burning young revolutionary. But look what came out”. She criticised the
South African media for picking up the story and publishing its “verbatim”
which she found “even more disturbing”. She asked: “Does it mean that because
they could not reach me they would give a distant journalist and a paper known
for its sensationalism the benefit of the doubt, and not me?” The Evening
Standard newspaper further reported that she said she “cannot forgive him
[Mandela] for going to receive the Nobel [Peace Prize in 1993] with his jailer
[FW] de Klerk”. “Hand in hand they went”, she is quoted as saying of Mandela and
De Klerk. Winnie apparently asked if we thought “Klerk released him [Mandela] from
the goodness of his heart” and went on to say “the times dictated it, the world
had changed, and our struggle was not a flash in the pan, it was bloody to say
the least and we had given rivers of blood”. She allegedly said she “had kept
it alive with every means at my disposal”.

Winnie’s denial of the
interview
reminds me of what I said of our media a while back that newspapers write
crap on a slow news day. But that’s a topic for another day, anyway. But being
a reasonable person that I believe Mandela is, I suspected he must have been hurt
by Winnie’s remarks,
if they were ever true, despite her denying
them. And assuming that this fabricated interview is anything to go by, I
would have agreed with a couple of her points though, that:

Ø
The Truth and Reconciliation Commission was a “charade”.
This was confirmed to a certain degree by a Constitutional Court
ruling that input of the victims, relatives and family members of those
whose loved once were victims of apartheid crimes and have applied for
presidential pardons must be take into account. As she apparently put it: “How
does it help anyone to know where and how their loved ones were killed or
buried?”

Ø
Mandela may have let us down not just for the
fun of it but because at the time it felt “the right thing to do for his people
and the country at large”. I have always maintained, and still do, that despite
how many of us, if not the whole world, view and envy Mandela and appreciates what
he had done – he must have done something terrible wrong that if we are to know
of it “all the adoration, love and respect and everything good he deserves and
we think of him right now would all go away in a second if were are to know
nothing but the whole truth about the ‘negotiated settlement’ for our freedom
and democracy. What I am trying to say is that Mandela must have done something
terribly bad we do not know of to this day and which we probably will never
know. But good for him that we do not know that or lucky to those that do know but
will dare not tell the world. And if letting us down or cracking a “bad deal” for
us was the only option he had at the time, then so be it,

Ø
Mandela has been and is sometimes turned into a “corporate
foundation” which he has “no control (of) or say any more (in matters that
relate to him or the foundation itself)”. Even more sadly, as Winnie apparently
put it: “He is (abusively) wheeled out globally to collect the money and he is
content doing that [and] the ANC have effectively sidelined him but they keep
him as a figurehead for the sake of appearance”. And this is quite true. We have
seen this before during and before last 2009 general elections,

Ø
Lastly, we have a somewhat “bias” media coverage
here in South Africa
for important things that should receive more media coverage do not, and that
things that are not in the public interest get the most coverage. And this is
same point I have addressed before.

But whatever the case, and assuming there is any truth to the
'fabricated'
interview, here in South
Africa one is certainly entitled to express a
constitutional right to freedom of opinion and expression irrespective of where
in the world one is.

Sunday Times reported that Naipaul
“could not be reached for comment” at the time while its managing editor Doug
Wills told the SABC two days prior that “the interview did take place, and that
[Winnie] posed for a picture with Nadira and [his husband] after it”. But City
Press quoted Naipaul as saying:
“... [Winnie] should stand by her controversial words and show the great
leadership for which [she’s] become know”. Naipaul told
City Press that she stood by the “contents of the interview” which was
conducted in July 2009 when she visited Winnie’s home in Soweto with Mandela. Her
insistence on having interviewed Winnie came after Winnie denied
granting her the fabricated
interview when she visited South Africa in the year alleged.

What is also surprising, however, and which to date has not
been clarified by neither newspapers (City Pres and The Times) is Naipaul’s claim
to
City Press that the alleged fabricated interview with Winnie took place in
July 2009 while The Times on the other hand reported the
interview to have take place August that same year. Who is fooling who here?

Mandela is a symbol of reconciliation and peace. But he is
also a potent symbol of Struggle over oppression, has become an inspiration to
all people who suffer oppression, and has demonstrated that one can wage a just
war to achieve freedom and people's power, Winnie wrote
in the Sunday Times of the former and first democratically elected president.

BruElla Gila wrote to the newspaper asking “why then would a
person of [Winnie’s] stature resort to fear and denialism in fear of reprisal
by fellow comrades or even worse being declared an outcast in a party [she has made
her home since her youth]?”. In her interview
with City Press, Naipaul said she “took notes during the interview”. Many fellow
bloggers and opinionated South Africans, like Khaya Dlanga, wondered
“what it is that maybe Mandela could have done” to Winnie that may have led to the
alleged
interview . Dlanga suggested that Winnie was “mistaken” on Mandela because she
spoke of him “as if it was not the ANC collective that made the decisions that
caused her to complain about Nelson Mandela by [placing] all the blame squarely
on his shoulders”.

Winnie, said
Dlanga, acted as if she was “not part of the NEC that agreed to the principles
that would lead to the formation a new South Africa”.
Another fellow blogger, also an opinionated South African like me, Sipho
Hlongwane, wondered
if indeed Mandela had sold us [black people] out. So, what is your take?
Were we black people sold out by Mandela?

Disclaimer: All articles and letters published on MyNews24 have been independently written by members of News24's community. The views of users published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24. News24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Welcome to News24

Read more from our Users

With reference to Sean Davison's article "Assisted dying will save lives" (7/12/2016): How long before people are offered assisted-suicides to free up beds or because of some administrative mix-up? The poor and vulnerable in our society bear the most exposure. Read more...

We have the sunshine - some of the best in the world. We have the wind. But greedy Eskom is the dog in the manger wanting to control all our futures and our pockets.
It's time this monopoly was taken down, for the sake of all South Africans. Read more...

The nursing profession has always been regarded as a calling, and there are many wonderful people who still feel that way and are caring and compassionate in the performance of their jobs . Tragically though, for far too many who qualify as nurses, it is simply a job. Read more...

He has in the past managed to survive a number of motions of no confidence levelled against him. The big question is: how long is Zuma going to keep on surviving the call for him to step down as president? Read more...

Before you reach out for a bottle of cellulite cream, there are 10 facts about cellulites you’ve probably never heard of before that you have to know now before taking matters into your own hands. Read more...

We know you and your friends are behind the fees must fall movement. I see Wits has declared an increase in fees for 2017, if you can't even get that right, how are you planning on taking over the whole country? Read more...

Tell us a bit about yourself:

Saving your profile

Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location.
If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a
location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to
take affect.

Your Location*

Weather*

Always remember my setting

Saving your settings

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.