Education, From The Capitol To The Classroom

Stories about students: How does education policy affect the way students learn and grow? Can schools meet their needs as they balance ramped-up testing with personal changes and busy schedules? And are students who need help getting it?

Stories about educators: How are those responsible for implementing education policy in schools − from classroom teachers, to district administrators, to school board members − affected by changes at the top? And how well do they meet their challenge of reaching students with varying abilities and needs?

Stories about school assessment: With an increased push for 'accountability' in schools, what can test scores tell us about teacher effectiveness and student learning − and what can't they tell us? What does the data say about how schools at all levels are performing?

LATEST POSTS

Stories about government influence: Who are the people and groups most instrumental in crafting education policy? What are their priorities and agendas? And how do they work together when they disagree?

Stories about money: How do local, state, and federal governments pay to support the education policies they craft? How do direct costs of going to school − from textbooks to tuition − hit a parent or student's bottom line? And how do changing budgets and funding formulas affect learning and teaching?

Should Indiana’s Superintendent Be Elected Or Appointed?

July 16, 2014 | 4:22 PM

Some Hoosiers question whether the choice of a State Superintendent of Public Instruction should fall to voters or government officials.

But people still have plenty to say about it.

Board member Gordon Hendry issued a statement to the press yesterday that’s become the talk of the town. He insisted that board infighting is not a partisan issue, and reiterated what he said at last week’s meeting: “The superintendent was elected, but not as an education czar.”

The key word here is elected.

The Superintendent of Public Instruction is an elected official; all other board members are appointed by the governor. As some have recently suggested, when the political views of those two government officials clash, it can cause some friction.

So, many people are wondering: Should the superintendent be an elected position?

Look, we don’t care if Glenda Ritz, or someone appointed by the governor or someone appointed by the state board heads up education in Indiana. It should be abundantly clear by now that Indiana needs an appointed, not an elected, superintendent of public instruction.

We believe it should be the governor — be it Republican or Democrat — who should be appointing a superintendent, and thereby avoiding all of this bickering that interferes with the serious business of education.

The first question we have to answer is, is this even a possibility?

According to the Indiana Law Blog, the state Constitution requires there be a State Superintendent, but leaves the method of selection up to legislators. Since it’s written into state law, reformers would need to push for amendment to make the position appointed by the governor.

In a blog post late last winter, Mind Trust CEO David Harris laid out his case for this type of reform, questioning why any of Indiana’s educational leadership should lie outside of the governor’s office:

The system we have now doesn’t make sense. The Legislature decided long ago that our governor leads on education policy. The governor appoints 10 of the 11 members of the State Board of Education. And, as Gov. Pence recently noted, Indiana law requires the state board to set K-12 education policy and then oversee the Department of Education’s implementation of those policies.

If we are going to give our governors authority to set education policy, we also need to give them the ability to implement that policy. Why elect one executive branch official to execute the policies of another?

Granting to the governor the authority to appoint the superintendent would ensure alignment between the governor as policymaker and the superintendent as the implementer. More important, it would better equip voters to know who is responsible for the state’s education policy and, therefore, whom to hold accountable.

As pointed out in an Indiana Forefront commentary, state law authorizes the governor to lead on education through his or her appointments to the board, but empowers the state superintendent with many of the aspects of implementation.

On the other hand, many Hoosiers remain satisfied with the current system.

“[The superintendent] represents the will of Hoosier voters,” said Lynn Richard Nelson, a retired education professor from Purdue University, at last week’s board meeting.

“The public and politicians may debate her ideas and practices; she may be persuaded to change her mind. However, she should not be impeded in carrying out her duties,” Nelson continued in an editorial for the Lafayette Journal & Courier.

“If you wanted to run the Department of Education, you should have registered as a candidate in 2012!” said members of the College Democrats of Indiana in a petition we reported about earlier this week.

Indiana is one of 13 states where voters decide. In the remainder of states, the chief is appointed by the governor or a state board of education.

Topics

Comments

Sean W.

I’m not in favor for governor or board appointed superintendent. This should be decided by Hoosier voters. In fact, I would like to see the Board of Education member be an elected position. You can say it is not partisan all you want, but if a Democrat or Republican governor appoints all positions in education, it will be unbalanced and unchecked on which policies are passed and implemented. Having all positions voter elected allows more freedom to choose individuals who are well qualified for the position that would serve Indiana well. There are great educators, Republican and Democrats alike, that would serve us well but unfortunately does not get that chance unless that have an in with the governor. Also, just because not every member of the board is of the same party doesn’t mean that their views on education are diverse. Believe it or not but not every person who is a Republican or Democrat agrees 100% with their party.

Jorfer88

I think, because of the need to have name recognition across the state and secure funds for campaigning, it would be a bad idea to do that, but I think there should be an election option to either retain or remove them. This exists for the Florida Supreme Court judges.