Rumsfeld wrote:I haven't seen a lot of bedwetting. With a few exceptions I've seen people pointing out the obvious, which is that we've been playing poorly for a quarter of a season. Obviously, fans being fans, there is some frustration there. I think there is pretty much universal opinion on the board that we are much better than we're playing, but I guess being smug and imagining you're on an island of rationality amidst a sea of craziness makes you feel better, even if it's completely invented on your part.

It's called the strawmen argument Rummy!

If fans show any concern about Canuck performance.... well they're wetting the bed.

If fans say Canucks need more toughness... well they're sayin they want 3 goons in the Top 6.

Rumsfeld wrote:The team is sucking. Obviously they should improve, but I'm pretty damn sure you didn't have them pencilled in for 11th place after 19 games.

The Great Strangelove predicted (in the Predictions Thread) that your Canucks would be in 11th at Xmas.

The Great Strangelove is not bragging because the Great Strangelove knows it's not Xmas yet.

The Great Strangelove is just trying to interact socially.

Rumsfeld wrote:I'd say there's a better chance of Coco and Pot disagreeing about something as there is we'll ever see the Luongo of 2007

Strangelove wrote:So have you and Potski ever disagreed on anything of consequence?

(As I lay on the couch with my feet up)

There was this one time Doc.

I think we were debating oreos and chocolate chip cookies.

It got pretty contentious I must say, it ended with a wasted oreo drowning down to the bottom of the glass when we were unable to keep it with our individual straws because we couldn't decide who would reach into the glass, pick it out and eat it.

I said, we should have had chocolate chip cookies, because it's not absolutely necessary to dunk your chocolate chip cookies into the milk, especially when you're sharing one glass of milk between two people.

It's hard to get anywhere in this van if you want to stop every time you see a pothole.

Why coco, if I didn't know you better I'd say you're getting angry! How out of character. Has a nerve been struck, mayhaps?

Don't get angry coco. It might make me angry.

You wouldn't like me when I'm angry.

*slowly sharpens rusty OF knife*

Aw, who am I kidding. I could never get angry with you Coco, or your cookie-dipping companion/BFF. I myself have made a life-long commitment to ingesting more vegetables. Not in suppository form of course, but I digress...

Y'all are A-OK in my book. And the fact that you're both excellent hockey posters alleviates most of the gayness of it all.

Rumsfeld wrote:It's hard to get anywhere in this van if you want to stop every time you see a pothole.

Why coco, if I didn't know you better I'd say you're getting angry! How out of character. Has a nerve been struck, mayhaps?

Don't get angry coco. It might make me angry.

You wouldn't like me when I'm angry.

*slowly sharpens rusty OF knife*

No nerves were struck my friend, just a little verbal jousting to make light of the situation is all.

Too bad that even if a nerve had been struck the OF, and the HT is neutered over in these parts.

Rumsfeld wrote:Aw, who am I kidding. I could never get angry with you Coco, or your cookie-dipping companion/BFF. I myself have made a life-long commitment to ingesting more vegetables. Not in suppository form of course, but I digress...

Only salamis go in the suppository, what kind of faggot would use a vegetable?