Laurie,
I too have used Copath for 3 years now, it's not perfect, but is
much better than what we did have. Many reports will depend on how your
dictionaries are populated. If you are having a specific problem, I would
be glad to try and help you.
-----Original Message-----
From: Colbert, Laurie [mailto:LColbert@phsca.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 2:17 PM
To: 'Weems, Joyce'; 'Paivi Parkkisenniemi'; 'histonet'
Subject: RE: Windows programs in pathology lab
We have CoPath for a year and it has done nothing for us in Histology as far
as cutting down on paperwork. We thought we would be able to get a lot of
our workload reports, but we have not been able to figure out one report. I
am not a very computer-oriented person, but our experts here have not been
able to work out anything for us, either. I do not recommend CoPath.
Laurie Colbert
SJMC
Burbank, CA
-----Original Message-----
From: Weems, Joyce [mailto:JWEEMS@sjha.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 2:47 PM
To: 'Paivi Parkkisenniemi'; 'histonet'
Subject: RE: Windows programs in pathology lab
I believe CoPath is a good choice. We have Cerner and find that it is not
geared to Anatomic Pathology as well as it is to the Clinical lab. Good
luck! j
Joyce Weems
Pathology Manager
Saint Joseph's Hospital of Atlanta
-----Original Message-----
From: Paivi Parkkisenniemi [SMTP:paivi.parkkisenniemi@lshp.fi]
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 3:32 AM
To: 'histonet'
Subject: Windows programs in pathology lab
Dear histonetters,
We are going to change the Windows program we use in our
histology + sytology lab.Therefore would be very interested in what
kind of
programs do you use in your labs ? Have anyone used for example
CoPath Plus
system ?,
or what kind of experiences do you have about other programs ?
With the best wishes to all,
Paivi Parkkisenniemi
Lapin keskussairaala/ Patologian osasto
Rovaniemi
Finland