"It takes a certain kind of human being to inflict wanton violence and death on another person...'

Pretoria, South Africa. Statement by the TAU-SA: "It takes a certain kind of human being to inflict wanton violence and death on another person. This behavior has been endemic throughout history, but almost always within the context of war, or because of religious or ethnic animosity.

In South Africa the perpetrators seem to relish torturing and killing their victims...

"The savagery which hallmarks certain criminal acts in South Africa appears gratuitous however, as if the perpetrators relish torturing and killing their victims. The government and some commentators declare that the particular barbarity against farmers for example, is simply just another murder (or attempted murder), to be categorized as such within the country’s general criminal statistics.

"But the statistics reveal something else: farmers, mostly but not all white, are murdered at three times the rate of ordinary citizens and at twice the level of South Africa’s policemen. Another factor in the crime narrative is that many old people are the victims. "Soft targets?" Of course: the elderly cannot defend themselves and farmers are almost always isolated on their properties.

But what lies behind the savagery of many of these attacks?

-- In their book Blood Sisters (Lapa Publishers 2012), two South African sisters Roelien Schutte and Eileen de Jager recount their experiences cleaning up after bloody crimes. That is their business. The book contains a special chapter on farm murders.

“The scene at the first farm attack was horrible” they said. “The old man only just survived. He was beaten so severely that his head was split open right to the skull, and he was stabbed six or seven times with a panga -- (machete, sugar-cane slasher) - in his side, of all places.” There were five attackers and the old man tried to fight them off. “His wife locked herself in another room, something they agreed she would do in the event of an attack”.

What sort of a country is it that good farming people who have worked hard all their lives must live each and every day in fear of an attack?

Do Swedish or Canadian or Brazilian farmers live like this?

Not everyone was as 'lucky' as the old man and his wife, say the authors. (Today in South Africa the buzz words are “You were lucky they didn’t kill you!” after a robbery or a hijack!)

Elsewhere, on a farm somewhere in Limpopo province, a couple in their eighties was brutally murdered. “Both their bodies were full of cuts and the old woman was raped before they slit her throat. Forensic evidence indicated that the old man was forced to get down on his knees before he was shot execution style.”

The authors said the scene was quiet testimony to “inhumane cruelty”.

Robbery is just a 'side-effect' but not the motive...

Roelien and Eileen declare unambiguously - “In a farm murder, robbery is seldom the motive. Robbery is merely a side effect. Murder is the motive, revenge another element. It’s actually about torture and murder.”

'Nobody in South Africa knows about the hours of torture...'

The women believe the violence they see on television news is “twisted and watered down too much when presented to the public. We see news as it happens. Everybody thinks the perpetrators go in and out, shoot the people and everything is over. Nobody knows about the hours of torture. We see it in what we find after a murder.

An old woman being raped in front of her husband;

an old man whose Achilles’ tendons are cut so that he can’t walk anymore. After that he is executed - on his knees”.

The women say most men are shot execution style in farm attacks.

Not even innocent pets are left alone “Their throats are also slit. Or they are kicked to death. Or their heads stepped on. It’s as if these bastards get joy from this”, the women declare.

Hate as a motivation:

Eileen and Roelien think the term “farm murders” should be replaced with the words “farm terror”. They see hate as a motivation.

These attackers mostly hunt in packs of five. They often spend hours at the scene of a murder. “We see how they even prepared food and ate during the torture. They take their time with the torture.

To burn somebody with a heated dropper - an iron pole normally used in the farm’s fencing - takes time.

To sharpen a broomstick before you push it up a woman’s vagina takes time”.

What kind of monster does such a thing, they ask. The women tell of fishing rods and bottles found in victims’ vaginas; about faces turned into an unrecognizable pulp, beaten over and over until no facial features are discernible. The two women believe that keeping quiet about this means that South Africans and the rest of the world are totally uninformed about the scale, intensity and true nature of farm murders.

“We once had to go and clean up on a farm where a young man was killed. A week afterwards his mother was murdered, and a week later it was his dad’s turn. Have you read anything about that in the newspapers? “

The father was killed in a most horrific way. “He was cut up, completely dismembered - hands, arms, legs, all cut off at the joints, then they put the pieces back together like a jigsaw puzzle and displayed the body with his arms extended, almost like he was crucified. Everywhere in the house there were little heaps of ashes and dolosse¸ the bones used by witchdoctors”.

But there has not been a peep from the ANC, nor a peep from the father of the ANC, Nelson Mandela. No details were given to the public, everything swept under the carpet. This book should be required reading for those who are still trying to find excuses for this behavior. (

During a recent television debate, it was declared that farm murders 'could be seen as simply another crime' and that 'no ulterior motive should be attributed to them, least of all a racial motive'. But how can it be simply “another crime” when farm murders are three times the country’s murder average, never mind the savagery that accompanies these murders?

The fact that farmers occupy “so much” land -- (less than 0.6% of the entire country's land-surface is dedicated to commercial food-producing farms) -- was also put forward as a reason.

If the ANC is not prepared to explain to their obtuse followers that farmers provide the country’s food, then it follows the ANC is not worried about this barbarism. Their silence says it all!

Anyway, what is there to “debate”? Debates usually imply there are two sides to a story. There aren’t two sides to this story. The facts are not up for argument. The point is: what are the police doing about these murders, given that the government disbanded the rural Commandos many years ago. The government exposed the farmers, and they must now rectify this neglect.

From the top:...

SA’s erstwhile president Nelson Mandela refused to reject violence as a condition of his release. Violence increased dramatically after his release in February 1990. At a press conference on June 3, 1990, Mandela said that “the only type of violence we accept is organized violence in the form of armed action which is properly controlled and where the targets have been carefully selected”.

Violence was always a part of the ANC’s DNA, and even after his release for negotiations with the previous government, Mandela talked of “armed action” and “targets”.

In January 1990 (before his release from his home at Victor Verster prison) there were 79 attacks on policemen, but from then to mid May of the same year of 1990, this figure had increased to 886.

During the same period deaths went up from one to 27, injuries from 45 to 279, home attacks from 51 to 232, while attacks on vehicles increased from 100 to 651. Violence rocketed after Mandela’s release, but he said nothing.

So it’s no wonder the ANC does nothing about the current barbarism - violence is part of their DNA. They clearly consider this behavior normal.

The ANC bombed, necklaced and terrorized its path to power:

Dr. Anthea Jeffery: “The Truth about the Truth Commission” (SAIRR 1999) clearly outlines how the ANC bombed, necklaced and terrorized on its path to power.

The Shell House massacre was an example of Mr. Mandela’s contempt for the law and his cavalier approach to violence and killing:

In March 1994 thousands of Zulu loyalists armed with traditional weapons marched through Johannesburg and past the ANC’s Shell House (now Luthuli House) in solidarity with the Zulu king. Snipers were on the roof of Shell House. They killed at least ten Zulus in cold blood on the express instructions of Nelson Mandela. He told the snipers to use lethal force if necessary to protect Shell House. He then refused police permission to enter the building to conduct an investigation.

He brazenly confirmed this at a press conference, knowing that no one would prosecute him for the deaths of these Zulus. Mr Justice Robert Nugent found in a 1997 judicial enquiry into the shootings that “there was no justification for shooting at the crowd at all, and that the barrage of fire from the ANC was grossly excessive”.

Julius Malema who now (*purportedly*) heads his own political party Economic Freedom Fighters, and has publicly told the mobs to “take back the land” and that if the farmers won’t give it over willingly, then “they will be sorry”. The green light for violence has been given from the country’s top echelons, so farmers are fair game. After all, this is how the ANC took power. Violence is the party’s modus operandi.

The other DNA:

Police Minister Nathi Mthethwa says crime in South Africa is “indiscriminate”, that 'blacks suffer from crime as well as whites'. Of course they do: they are victims of their own people. In white countries one does not see the type of savagery and blood lust one sees in South Africa. The farm murder savagery is virtually unheard of in Norway, Australia, Canada and other 'overwhelmingly white' countries.

The government approach to 'justice' is different when applied to whites:

It is unfortunate that South Africa’s whites are the victims of history and geography, so what is generic to many in South Africa is inflicted on whites who, because of their DNA, do not retaliate in kind. The government’s approach to justice is sometimes different when applied to whites.

The Gauteng black township of Khutsong recently witnessed rampaging mobs out for retribution for what they believed were criminal acts that had gone unpunished. Houses with black people inside, municipal offices, libraries and shops were burnt to the ground. People were necklaced (they were torched with a petrol-filled tyre around their necks). Others were slashed to death with pangas during these "protests" against the lack of government protection against gangs and drugs in the area. Residents took the law into their own hands -- and as far as is known, nobody has been arrested for these atrocities.

If a white farmer shoots someone in self-defence on his property, he gets arrested and charged with murder:

But if a farmer shoots at someone on his property whom he suspects could cause harm, and that person is killed or injured, the farmer is arrested and in most cases is charged with murder or attempted murder. In this case there is immediate action by the police, but no action is taken in the townships against vigilante mobs.

In fact, there are no-go areas which the police will not enter!

One doesn’t see white vigilante mobs swarming into (black) areas with retribution on their minds, burning and necklacing people and slicing others up with pangas.

Africa is savagely violent.

The Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo are currently embroiled in vicious internal battles. Sudan, Somalia, Kenya and Nigeria are struggling to keep the peace. Mozambique now faces an uprising. And so it goes on. The turmoil is not only violent, it is savagely violent. Chopped off limbs, mindless massacres and the endless march of refugees “escaping the violence” regularly appear on our TV screens.

We place emphasis on farm murders because TAU SA’s responsibility is to inform the world about the challenges facing commercial farmers here at the tip of Africa.

But we cannot avert our eyes to what happens to others in this country. We close with the following report:

Tuesday November 5, 2013: During a recent trial of three black men, it was revealed they broke into a family home in Walkerville, Johannesburg where they assaulted and shot dead Tony Viana, 53, brutally raped and killed his wife Geraldine and tied up and gagged their sobbing son Amaro.

Above: They pushed the young boy into a bath of boiling water to drown him “because he would be able to identify them”. While raping Mrs. Viana, they stood on her face to restrain her. During what was stated to be a "burglary", the family’s dog barked. He was killed by disembowelment. The three black men left the courtroom for their cells laughing, according to Johannesburg’s Beeld newspaper.

In the new South Africa, peoples of entirely different values, history, race, backgrounds and thought processes are living together in what is incongruously called a “rainbow” nation. There was a time when separation seemed to be the only sane solution, but this policy was kicked under the bus.

"It is now commonly accepted that Afrikaners and South African whites generally are in deep trouble. There are now two, no three, major black political parties who are trying to outbid one another in confiscating white-owned land, taxing us more, putting stricter racial quotas on our rugby and cricket teams, swamping the remaining white-majority schools with black pupils and making it harder for white students to gain entry to university. Even local taxes are used in an attempt to bankrupt many white-owned small businesses or family-owned farms.

"All in all, the multicultural experiment is failing dismally in South Africa. Violence and mayhem are rising (70,000 of us killed since 1994), like corruption, environmental degradation and intolerance among South Africa’s linguistic and ethnic groups. Foreign Africans, like white farmers, are routinely killed and more often than not the police and the criminal justice system are turning a blind eye.

The city of Pretoria, with the Voortrekker Monument in the foreground

"To many people overseas, South Africa is a lost cause, a sinking ship only worth abandoning. Yet, the very failure of our society presents a powerful argument against political correctness that may still save us and European civilization. It will take decades for Europe or North America to reach the state of advanced decay that South Africa finds itself in. We are ahead of the curve, as they say. We are the empirical proof that multiculturalism, affirmative action, the adulation of black people simply because they are black, lead straight to disaster!

"But still, the skeptic may ask, why is it worth saving three or four million million whites in South Africa when the entire European/Western civilization is currently at risk? When support is needed to save France, Britain, the USA, from a programmed demise and takeover by other cultures, why bother about South Africa?

I accept that laying down our lives for most of the twentieth century in at least four wars fought for the Allies of for the West, does not count for much. But here are some persuasive reasons why you should support us now, in our final battle for survival. It is not a physical, but a spiritual battle, one of the will. We have many enemies and few friends… Yet we continue, against all odds, to resist being murdered, being acculturated, being assimilated!

Why the Afrikaner people are worth saving (and supporting)

"Most of us come from Northern Europe which, for the last 300 years or so, ever since the Enlightenment, has produced some of the foremost breakthroughs in science, philosophy, art, music and literature.

If it is worth saving Northern Europeans, it is worth saving us. In fact, we are a unique group of interbred Dutch, Germans, French and Scots who mostly speak a modernised Germanic dialect called Afrikaans. During the twentieth century we were united during a great national movement that was only brought down through foreign intervention, terror, intense propaganda, financial sanctions and more. Instead of getting a federal system and tolerance for ethnic diversity, we got Leninism and ethnic domination, even a slow genocide during which we are being killed one by one, family by family.

To many people, language is but a means of communication. Yet without Milton or the English Romantic poets, the English language would never have expressed a unique national identity, nor would German have acquired a high status without Goethe, Russian without Pushkin and Dostoevsky, etc.

"The astonishing aspect about our language, Afrikaans, is that, while evolving into a simplified grammar, its lexicon or vocabulary has remained more or less intact since the European Middle Ages, much more so than even the major European languages.

"We maintain a unique link with our distant past in Europe. There is some evidence that most of Northern Europe spoke dialects very similar to Afrikaans from 1300 to 1600 when Low German was the lingua franca of the Hanseatic League, a forerunner of the European Union which bound hundreds of cities together, from Russia to England and the Low Countries.

"This trade and seafarer’s tongue finally beached right here in South Africa in 1652. We nurtured and cared for this language which today, against the hostility of the state and global corporations who would like to see it disappear, remains a vehicle for cultural and scientific expression, for teaching anything from law to mathematics, from film to cooking, from information technology to accounting or high finance.

The Afrikaners have become hardy and strong after more than three centuries in Africa:

Above: "After more than three centuries in Africa, we have become hardy and strong. Is there any other country in the world where blacks have to impose racial quotas favouring themselves because they feel threatened by the sporting prowess of whites? Not to mention the most radical affirmative action programme on earth, in order to starve us economically, intellectually, even literally, so as to prevent us from producing food on our farms, like we have done since the 1650s!

The battle for South Africa is not over. One would have thought our fate was sealed in 1994 when Nelson Mandela became president of this country, after the dismal failure of the then Afrikaner leadership during the negotiations at Kempton Park. An avowed communist and co-conspirator of the East German Stasi, Joe Slovo, triumphed over them all. Yet, such is our resilience in the face of terror, farm murders, racial and language discrimination, economic and educational injustices, that after 20 years of very hostile government we are still here!

The unique contribution of Afrikaners to the future of Europe?

Just today I saw a French TV debate on Ce soir ou jamais! in which a Cameroonian author, Léonora Miano, told Elisabeth Lévy “not to be afraid of becoming a minority in France”. Lévy took the risk of articulating the apprehension of many French people in seeing their country changed culturally by immigration. With supreme arrogance, Miano told her bluntly that “this is what is called a mutation” and “it is going to happen”.

What will life be like once the French are a minority in France, the Dutch a minority in the Netherlands, the Italians a minority in Italy, and so on? Well, they need look no further than South Africa to find the nightmarish answer. Once one becomes a minority under a non-Western majority, one is simply forced to undergo constant violence, debasement, humiliation and impoverishment through racial and ethnic quotas.

The testimony that we Afrikaners bring to the international debate on immigration, multiculturalism, race and ethnicity, may yet save Western and European civilization! Yet for that possibility to be realised, we ourselves need to survive.

We did not ask to be cast ashore in 1652...

We did not ask to be cast ashore in 1652, yet we have made the most of our opportunity by building the most successful country in Africa, a country where we are today cast as foreigners. We are denied access to the very institutions our forebears had founded while our names are removed from towns, streets and buildings, to bring home to us that we are the racial and cultural “other”. We are good enough to pay taxes but not to be counted as full citizens; a myriad of laws impose a fundamental inequality on us under the pretext of ensuring, precisely, “racial equality”.

In South Africa -- as there will no doubt soon be all over the world -- we have something called “fair discrimination”, which is nothing other than anti-white racism.

If you believe our voice and unique testimony should be heard -- and that we do not deserve simply being killed or expelled from our own country, then we humbly ask you to support our struggle for dignity, equality and fair treatment by the black majority and their radical communist allies.

For our long-term survival, like that of the Palestinians, only self-government will suffice.

A rather murky group of people have set up shop on Facebook from where they campaign against the crystal-clear voice of reason coming from PRAAG (the Pro-Afrikaans Action Group). From their FB page, these (*strongly suspected ANC-regime agents-provocateurs) even launched 'warnings' to PRAAG's advertisers about its perceived 'racism.' But what are the contents of these claimed 'racist' reports written by PRAAG?

In a recent article, Dan Roodt describes South Africa's rapid descent into a sadistic society, where rape and in particular, the horrifically high rape of small children, are grossly underreported and almost entirely ignored by the 'white' academic world for fear of a witchhunt. He writes : "most estimates put the number of such (rape) crimes at more than a million per year or approximately three thousand per day. " He is touching on an even more delicate subject when he writes about the 'dehumanising torture of farmers':

Roodt writes: "Even calling it “our country” might be a malapropism in that Afrikaners like myself are no longer considered full citizens in an Afro-Saxon state that is slouching towards some incarnation of Mugabe’s Zimbabwe or, better still, Charles Taylor’s Liberia. This week, Taylor’s conviction as a war criminal was confirmed by an international court, the first head of state to be jailed for such crimes committed in Sierra Leone while he was in office.

He writes: "In the age of social media, people communicate their horror and despair at being captives in this, our “paradise of cruelty”. Policing our language (...) is a poor substitute for the lack of policing elsewhere. As the twentieth century has shown, utopias are always dangerous, be they fascist or communist. Every utopia has turned into its mirror image, a dystopia replete with genocide. South Africa’s pursuit of a racial biopolitics known as “transformation”, as well as extreme forms of cultural relativism, have unleashed hitherto unknown social consequences.

South Africa: the rape and murder capital of the world:

"In the domain of sexual violence at least, the country has earned the dubious title of “rape capital of the world” and it regularly tops international murder tables too.

"Everybody in South Africa, whether white or black, fears a witch-hunt in some or other form. Especially the kind of witch-hunt whereby you are called a “racist”, lose your tenured university job and spend the rest of your life in ignominy.

The rape of babies and the Virgin Cleansing Myth:

Above: Roodt writes that "White academics are completely silent on ukuthwala or the so-called 'virgin cleansing myth' ... if the professors do not actually deny in writing that such phenomena exist... Here and there information filters through the iron curtain of political correctness: the only academic article worth reading on the “virgin cleansing myth” is that by Suzanne Leclerc-Madlala which appeared in The African Journal of AIDS Research in 2002 under the title, “On The Virgin Cleansing Myth: Gendered Bodies, AIDS and Ethnomedicine“. http://scnc.ukzn.ac.za/doc/Health/Aids/LeclercMadlala-S_Virgin_cleansing_myth_HIV-AIDS_ethnomedicine.pdf .

Roodt: "It (the LeClerk-Madalala article) provides a fascinating glimpse into the psycho-sexual paradigm in which, as she puts it, “virgin cleansing is believed to have both a therapeutic and a prophylactic effect” (against HIV-AIDS). Raping a child or a disabled person is therefore seen as a form of AIDS prevention or cure.

The Sociology of New York or London cannot explain South Africa's journey into the heart of darkness:

Roodt writes: "(...) It is of no use applying the sociology of New York or London to an outbreak of sadistic violence in Limpopo province. It is risible to see ostensibly educated people constantly blaming either “apartheid” or “poverty” for the horrors and cruelties afflicting this society.

But even the virgin cleansing myth (obliquely alluded to by Dr. Mabille in her critique of insipid Western feminism) does not go far enough in explaining South Africa’s journey upriver into the heart of darkness. We really lack the concepts to understand the enormity of what we are faced with.

He writes that "the retreat of Afrikaner power in South Africa has been coterminous with the resurgence of African belief systems, including witchcraft and ritual murders. The old Afrikaner government, while encouraging African ethnic identities, saw fit to suppress witchcraft and ritual murder by making it a criminal offence. Prior to becoming the first president of a united South African republic, Charles Robberts Swart introduced the Suppression of Witchcraft Act 3 of 1957 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witchcraft_Suppression_Act,_1957

--" In the early nineties South Africa experienced hundreds of killings associated with witchcraft and occult beliefs, leading to the Commission of Inquiry into Witchcraft Violence and Ritual Murders.

The murky role of occult beliefs during the SA revolution:

"We still do not understand the role that occult beliefs played during the revolution, especially in establishing hegemonic black politics and racial nationalism. The necklace, that symbol of revolution, is pregnant with ethnographic and cultural meaning. There is also evidence that young “comrades” intimidated traditional healers to extract money from clients and that the accusation of being a witch was used to eliminate political opponents.

Mrs. Winnie Madikizala-Mandela, that international heroine and former wife of Nelson Mandela, subscribed to the Maoist doctrine – ‘kill one, scare a thousand’ – that support is gained through terror and horror. She notoriously stated in 1986:

…'with our boxes of matches and our necklaces we shall liberate this country.'

Above: A necklace killing whereby a tyre is placed around the victim's neck, filled with petrol and then set alight.

South Africa's political system is tending towards sado-masochism...

He writes: "Child and even baby rape is another ghastly phenomenon indicating that South Africa has navigated to a new, alien moral code. Stating that "white men sometimes do it in some other country too", hardly mitigates the particular horror that it has assumed here in South Africa:

The British Guardian ran an article on 12 March 2009 entitled, “Raped and killed for being a lesbian: South Africa ignores ‘corrective’ attacks“. The Guardian’s website contains an accompanying video interview with lesbian rape victims, as well as young black men who are outspoken in their support of “corrective rape”.

... In Hillbrow, as recounted to me by a former policeman, young white female drug addicts are employed as prostitutes by Nigerian gangsters. When they are no longer useful to their pimps, they simply get injected with heroine and pushed off high rise buildings in what gets officially recorded by the police as “suicides”. In South Africa, the crime reality show is so much better than the fiction.

"The country’s academics are all but ignoring the scourge of rape, including infant rape, judging from the paucity of published articles in the field. To some extent they have acculturated to the witch-hunting culture in persecuting dissidents in their own ranks. Otherwise they engage in repetitive denunciations of “patriarchy” as if there were still a father left somewhere that has not been killed.

"One could even argue that the very structure of the South African political system is tending towards sado-masochism.

Whites warned to 'be more submissive'...

The new CEO of the liberal Institute of Race Relations, Dr Frans Cronjé, argued in Rapport that:

'whites should assume a far more submissive role in South Africa, lest they expose themselves to some form of collective revenge during a Second Revolution'. According to Cronjé, such a revolution will be …'a violent, racist and destructive transition from a reconciling democratic state to a hostile, black nationalist state… After the Second Revolution, white South Africans will lose their homes, their jobs and their businesses." -

The above was a brief extract from the original article: Read PRAAG and SUPPORT Dan Roodt every day- especially financially! He remains the voice of reason in a country which has indeed, already been plunged into the heart of darkness and sado-machocism.

Le Riche writes: "It is mighty big of you to take it on yourself to apologize for the atrocities inflicted by black racists on whites who only represent a small 9% minority in South Africa. This is especially a big step as the stereotype most white people worldwide have of Africans or black people in general, is that they never take responsibility. You just proved that assumption wrong.

You are absolutely 100% correct to say that black people are 'poor and get killed by other black people every day'. There are also 600,000 whites living in squatter camps across South Africa that you failed to mention:

And taking there are about 4-million whites out of a total population of 50-million, it is quite shocking to think that nearly one-quarter of this (white) minority lives in poverty.

They too are victims of crime, like their black counter parts. No dispute there.

As you might know it is an American gentleman by the name of Gregory Stanton who says that whites, and more specifically Afrikaners, are at level 6 (out of the 8 total stages) of Genocide. Here he says it, on video:

This international body is comprised of top experts on all modern genocides worldwide, from the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, Bosnia and Rwanda - just to name a few.

Stanton is against injustice, which is colour blind in itself, similar to poverty:

Stanton comes from the lineage of women's suffrage activist Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Henry Brewster Stanton, an anti-slavery leader. He worked as a voting rights worker in Mississippi, a Peace Corps Volunteer in the Ivory Coast, and as Church World Service/CARE Field Director in Cambodia in 1980.[4] )

It would be worthwhile reading this man’s biography: it warns that black racists are murdering Afrikaners, that the South African government does nothing to stop it, and that the genocide is aided and abetted through denialism by most blacks and some whites:

You will notice the most common denial in South Africa is point 10, which is,

“Claiming that what is going on (in South Africa) doesn’t fit the definition of genocide."

The reason for this denial is that most people think genocide just mean immediate “mass murder” (with huge numbers of people murdered all at once) -- and well, let’s face it, basically these people only know what they are told -- rather than obtaining a proper education and research on the subject.

You see Siyabonga, most people are like parrots. They just repeat fuzzy words and popular opinion, without having in-depth knowledge. It is what you call “Sheeple”. Like sheep being chased into a pen they just follow each other as a group.

The famous Lemkin (who in 1944 coined the word genocide in his book documenting Nazi atrocities: Axis Rule in Occupied Europe). He defined it as follows:

“By ‘genocide’ we mean the destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group. This new word, coined by the author (Lemkin) to denote an old practice in its modern development, is made from the ancient Greek word genos (race, tribe) and the Latin cide (killing)… Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group” (80).

Le Riche: "People or governments who allow Genocide don’t get away with it even many years later, after they denied any existence of it happening: justice eventually catches up.

"I would strongly suggest in order to sound like you know what you’re talking about to do proper research, and not fall into the trap of mass hysteria of ignorance as so many South Africans did under Apartheid, and even now in the “new” -- still not so enlightened -- South Africa.

Like Genocide, you also get different types of Oppression. As you are the beneficiary of racist laws I won’t expect you to see the black racism favouring you and others.

After all, these laws such as the Affirmative Action, and Black Economic Empowerment Acts are passed with the purpose of protecting blacks-only interests in the name of a Black Nationalist government.

When life is good, with laws that are in place to look after your wellbeing, it tends to blind that group of their own racism. I am sure that you must be aware that oppression in any form that ticks the following words falls into this category?

You will recognize words there that black people can relate to, there are also words which now fit to the events which the new South Africa's whites can relate to.

- As you can see, Oppression has many words to describe this noun. Similar to the word Genocide.

During Apartheid when I drove through a township I did not see oppression of blacks. People were happy and smiling. That experience of mine during Apartheid, like Genocide, does not mean it didn’t happen, or is not happening now.

As history judged those who were silent during Apartheid, so will history judge those who are silent now.

Le Riche adds sarcastically: "You are indeed correct by saying that Afrikaners own 'acres and acres of lavish land'. As you yourself know poverty is only black, when life is good and laws in place to look after your race", as I explained. It is well known that 'Afrikaners are born with huge sums of money, like Jews, and all families also have two or more farms with gold or coal mines'.

-- As with the Jews it is also understood why black South Africans live in poverty and don’t have jobs. Don’t you just hate rich Afrikaners?

-- After all, who would hate or murder people that others are made to believe are the reason for all their troubles?

-- Never happened once in history right? And when I mean history I don’t mean the short historical years of the “Freedom Struggle”.

There was actually a history before the Freedom Struggle was created on the eighth day…

As for Bantu education you are correct about how good it was. I can only guess you must be a very intelligent guy? Maybe got Bantu Education yourself to write such a marvelous piece of insight?

If you don’t have Bantu education I can assume you’re still a young guy. If that’s the case you will need to hit those books even harder to catch up to the education level of the pre 1994 generation:

As Rabelani Dagada, a lecturer at the Wits Business School said:

“Bantu education was far better in terms of quality than the education that our kids are receiving nowadays. That is where the problem is. Affirmative action should be about empowerment. The best way to empower is not to take from those who have and give to those who don’t have. It won’t work. After 20 years of democracy, the education levels have plunged. It’s worse than the so-called Bantu education.” http://www.citypress.co.za/news/bantu-education-was-better/

Le Riche: "I am baffled why you would say you don’t understand Afrikaners? You so clearly and humbly apologized, which shows insight well beyond your years, even showing a willingness to break through all those stereotypes of black people.

Heck, if I didn’t know any better I would have thought you’re an Afrikaner yourself! Unfortunately I must have to add, that you will need to brush up on research on certain topics. This will help you to fine tune your understanding of complex matters which is only privy to a select few.

You are correct that hate-crime targets Afrikaners more than blacks, Siyabonga.

I assume you do know that hate crimes are different to 'just crime'? Of course you do, as you showed considerable insight so far.

It is maybe a good idea to do more homework on the hate-crime subject too, as you will notice people can be targeted on their ethnicity, like Afrikaners or “Boers” which is a codeword used by most blacks for all whites.

Well Siyabonga, I know you are a very busy man so I won’t take any more of your time. Taking you are a Magazine Editor I think you will be very grateful for all the information I gave you. Though it is Wikipedia, it is a good start for further easy research. Looking forward to your next column.

All the best -- An Afrikaner

PS. You would have noticed I did not start the piece with “Dear Black People” as I feel it is unfair to give all black people acknowledgement for the vision and insight you displayed, and taking so much guilt on your shoulders by apologizing. You are indeed a one of a kind, a hero!

20131106

Update: From Oct 1 2013 -- Oct 31 2013 there were 29 known hate-murders by blacks against 'minorities' in SA:

(victims were Afrikaners, White English-Speaking South Africans, Coloured- and Indian people) :

2013 January - 20 Murdered.

2013 February - 13 Murdered.

2013 March: - 10 Murdered.

2013 April: - 18 Murdered.

2013 May: - 24 Murdered.

2013 June: - 15 Murdered.

2013 July: - 16 Murdered.

2013 August - 17 Murdered

2013 Sept - 21 murdered

1 Oct - 26 Oct: 29* murdered.

(*incl 1 Indian man & 1 Afrikaans-coloured man)

(*also at bottom of page: seperate chart of farm attacks in 2013 as compared to 2012)

Killed Oct 1 2013 up to Oct 28 2013: Twenty-three Afrikaners and four English-South Africans (murdered 'white' farmers also included 2 German- and one Dutch-origin white farmer) Also, in the hatecrimes targeting Indian-South Africans, one Indian bakery-owner was murdered execution style in the ongoing war for control of the lucrative SA bakery trade and one Afrikaans-coloured man was found disemboweled in a vicious hatecrime. All the perpetrators of these crimes against the minority-members listed below were black males. We only list the murders on this page below: there were many more attacks in which victims were left badly injured and traumatised - but had survived. Details of all the recorded attacks can be read on http://www.censorbugbear.org/farmitracker/reports

Five political parties in South Africa engage in massive hatespeech incitement against whites as part of election-propaganda:

This wave of hate-crimes must be seen against the background of the constant stream of publicity surrounding the presidential election in 2014 - which has seen at least five political parties in South Africa engage in excessive, inciting hatespeech against specifically the very small minority of 'white' ('Afrikaner and Boer') population (3,4million) in South Africa.

"The pre-genocidal wartalk in South Africa against Whites (Afrikaners, Boers, and white English-speakers) is reaching new heights, with five different political parties all calling openly for the destruction of all the whites, namely: the African National Congress, the SA Communist Party, the Cosatu trade union movement, the (ANC's straw-party) the Economic Freedom Fighters, and the Pan Africanist Congress of Azania. http://www.censorbugbear.org/farmitracker/reports/view/1781

The archive Farmitracker has thus far in 2013 logged more than 1,000 examples of black-racist hatespeech and incitements to kill whites by specific state-officials and/or leading members of political parties and black commentators/journalists since January 2013. Last year we logged 13 such incidents.

Above: One particularly foul example of genocidal hatespeech came from ANC town councillor Recato Eberwein Heidelberg, who wrote to Farmitracker directly from his email address amabhuna@zinja.co.za: "I personally hope genocide happens. Then we get rid of Amabhunus (Boers, Whites) that live in Cuckoo land. Kill a Boer, Kill a Farmer, Until Jesus Comes We the Communist ANC will Rule, Wake Up White Ogres (in Afrikaans: 'skrik wakker wit gedrogte). It must be noted that despite publication of this hatespeech, the ruling ANC-party has not seen fit to condemn Mr Eberwein for his comments.

Above: Even more shocking is the call by South Africa's chief justice, Moegoeng Moegoeng, speaking at the April 15 2013 Cape Town opening ceremony of the International commonwealth Law Conference, where he was accused of 'gunning for white males' in his speech, calling for 'War Against Whites in the Judicial Service of South Africa'. Such public statements makes one realize that South African whites could probably not expect to be treated equally and fairly in Chief Justice Moegoeng's court room. http://www.censorbugbear.org/farmitracker/reports/view/1206 Read more at http://www.censorbugbear.org/farmitracker/reports/view/1774#6jLJJdv9pHKq9SDB.99

hate crime, harassment, intimidation, or physical violence that is motivated by a bias against characteristics of the victim considered integral to the person's social identity:This includes the person's race, ethnicity, or religion. Some relatively broad hate-crime laws also include sexual orientation and mental or physical disability among the characteristics that define a hate crime.

Above: Centurion, The Reeds: 47-year-old Mrs Susan Nel was shot dead on Saturday-evening Oct 26 2013 next to her husband in their car by black gunmen who ran after their car, one gunman caught up with them and fired a shot through the driver's window: shooting Mrs Nel through the back of her skull. She died shortly after arrival at hospital.

The SAPS has confirmed the murder of Mr John van Staden 84, who was found murdered at 6am by his 2 little grandchildren: Disa Street, Touwsrivier. Karoo. He was found by his small grandchildren when they woke up at 6am.

Being forced to watch while 5 blacks crush your partner's skull with a plumbing wrench is ordinary crime? KZN farmer Dan Knight was murdered because the company he hired to harvest timber did not pay THEIR black employees in time. His partner, Ms Beth Butcher, recounted her horror at being forced to watch the attack. By “forced”, in a radio interview: her head was held and turned towards the victim by force, and her eyes were forced open by one of the attackers, so that she could witness for herself the sheer horror of Mr Knight’s head literally being beaten to a pulp by his attackers and pulverized by a plumber's wrench. Multiply the above horrific, barbaric act of racist hate crime by 4,000+ dead and often-tortured farmers who have died during farm attacks, multiply this by countless white victims who have been raped, attacked, robbed, hijacked, murdered and tortured by hate-filled criminals from "other groups", and you start to get the idea of what is going on in South Africa. It can surely only be described as widespread, endemic anti-white hate crime, if not the beginnings of a genocide. http://praag.org/?p=11265

The SAPS immediately pronounced it 'suicide' but did not investigate any further: a neighbour, Stoffberg, had received their frantic emergency call when they were being attacked and had rushed to the farm - only found the couple both shot dead. He had notified the SAPS. They took one look and told the news media it was a suicide... http://www.censorbugbear.org/farmitracker/reports/view/1714

12. Afrikaner resident Eugene van der Merwe 61, was beaten to death and his young son 13 badly hurt in fierce attack by two blacks on KZN Midlands farm:

Above: Two black men were arrested for this unmotivated double-murder of the elderly Afrikaner couple: arraigned in Klerksdorp magistrate's court October 14 2013. Mr Van der Schyff died in hospital a week after the attack. http://platinumweekly.co.za/articleA303.html

Farmers run more risks of being murdered than do SA police officers, say the Transvaal Agricultural Union and the Institute for Security Studies (ISS)

. Oct 23 2013 - Thus far in 2013 there were more farm attacks in the past 10 months than the entire year of 2013, says Henk van de Graaf of the TAU-SA. "A farmer has four times as much chance than any ordinary citizen to get murdered and twice as much chance to get murdered than does a SA police officer," says dr. Johan Burger, senior researcher of the Institute for Security Studies.Their comments follow on the recent wave of exceedingly cruel farm attacks especially in KZN, Gauteng, Mpumalanga and North West. Burger said based on the SA crime statistics and the Stats-SA population numbers, it shows that 31 out of every 100,000 SA citizens are murdered - as compared to 54 out of every 100,000 police officers (see chart above).

Above: The TLU-SA admits that they maintain 'very conservative' farm attack archives: they only record them if the victims' names are known, the town and the police case number.

But 120 out of every 100,000 farmers are being murdered --

more than double the number of police officers murdered. And certainly farming (in normal societies) should be much safer than policing.' TAU-SA maintains records of every farm murder for which they can find a town name, a police case number and the names of victims. Thus far this year there have been 181 farm-attacks - (2013: 171 by this time last year). During those attacks 54 farmers have already been murdered (compared to the entire year of 2012).Especially the farm attacks in KZN showed a dramatic increase. "Before this year's attacks, the last farm attack in KZN was in 2007. This year there have already been 21 attacks and nine murders,' said Van de Graaf. In the East Cape there were no farm murders last year but thus far this year nine have already been recorded there. In OKTOBER 2013 alone there have been 19 farm attacks and twelve farm murders countrywide. "One can only summise about the reason for this increase. However we at ISS believe that the fact that Julius Malema recently gained massive media attention with his comments about land-expropriations creates a climate for such attacks,' he said. Especially the extreme cruelty which accompanies many of these attacks against white farm families, angers the TAU. "It is absurd that people are tortured and their skulls beaten to a pulp just for a few cellphones. To us this is not just another 'ordinary crime'. Burger agreed that the government and the SAPS give far too little attention to preventing farm attacks. "SAPS minister Nathi Mthethwa held a conference last year because he was worried about the number of police officers killed. It makes no sense not to hold a similar conference about farm murders when it's clear that farmers are being murdered at twice the rate of police members'. All of the requests lodged by the TAU-SA that the SAPS appoints a special investigation team to establish the motives underlying these farm murders, have fallen on deaf ears." Van der Graaf: "Meanwhile the courses being offered in self-defence and security measures are booked solid. People want to know how to protect themselves...' Read more athttp://www.censorbugbear.org/farmitracker/reports/view/1716

Search This Blog

Rapes of white SA men in police-jails is a war-crime pattern

What is Genocide?

IMPORTANT NOTICE

October 20 2017

Please note that my site with the PAST SEVEN YEARS' information on atrocities against white South Africas, was hacked away. It used to be on https://www.censorbugbear.org. I apologize that this information is no longer available online. Anyone needing information about specific cases please email me at a.j.stuijt@knid.nl

For a name-list of murdered white farmers, - smallholders and their family and workers in South Africa, up to April 2011, view:

and for reports of human-rights violations against South African minorities, including whites, after 2011 see: http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.nl

The term "genocide" was coined by legal scholar Raphael Lemkin in 1943, writing:

'Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actionsaiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves.

The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of personal security, liberty, health, dignity and lives of the members of such groups... '