Abstract:

A method and apparatus effectuates bilateral commerce in ideas. An
originator and user-driven on-line commercial network system is designed
to facilitate idea submission, purchase, and licensing, and is easily
adapted to business-to-business transfers of innovation as well as
consumer-to-business transfers of innovation. The invention allows
originators of ideas to communicate nondisclosing synopses of ideas
globally to potential users, for users conveniently to search for
relevant ideas and for users potentially to bind an originator to a
limited duration license granting user the exclusive right to access and
consider confidentially the originator's fully disclosed idea. The
invention also allows users to communicate confidentially or
nonconfidentially unsolved problems or needs globally to potential
originators, for originators conveniently to search for relevant unsolved
problems or needs, and for originators to submit and communicate
confidentially proposed solutions to the soliciting user.

Claims:

1. A method of using a computer network to create an on-line forum where
originators or users can post ideas or unmet need or unsolved problems
comprising:receiving and storing in the database a plurality of two-part
descriptions each supplied by an originator or a user, each two-part
description including a first-level element in the form of a basic
description of each originator's idea or each user's unmet need or
unsolved problem, and a second-level element in the form of a detailed
description of each originator's idea or each user's unmet need or
unsolved problem;permitting users or originators, or both, to access and
select without restriction only the first-level elements of the stored
two-part descriptions; andpermitting users or originators, or both, to
search the contents of the first-level and second-level elements of the
two-part descriptions but disallowing visual access to the second-level
elements.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the search results display or provide
access to only the first level element and may be organized and displayed
according to an associated relevancy rank.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the first-level element is
nonconfidential in the form of a searchable and accessible basic
description, and the second-level element is confidential in the form of
a searchable, but not accessible detailed description.

4. The method of claim 1 comprising:providing selecting users with an
option to access the confidential second-level elements of the stored
two-part descriptions that correspond to the selected first-level
elements by electronically submitting to each selecting user a license
agreement including a confidentiality provision and other previously
supplied licensing terms; andupon receipt of license acceptance,
providing accepting users with unrestricted access on a confidential
basis via the computer to the confidential second-level elements of the
stored two-part descriptions corresponding to the selected first-level
elements.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the license agreement is a limited
duration, exclusive license, and the method comprises:upon receiving
license acceptance by one selecting user, subsequently restricting other
users from accessing both the first-level element and the second-level
element, of the two-part description selected by the licensed user for
the duration of the term of the exclusive license.

6. The method of claim 4 wherein the license agreement is a limited
duration, exclusive license, and the method comprises:providing an
originator with the option of specifying license terms which permit users
to continue to access and select the nonconfidential first-level element,
but not the confidential second-level element, of a selected two-part
description for the duration of the license term.

7. The method of claim 6 comprising:creating a queue of license accepting
users seeking access to the selected, but license restricted second-level
element.

8. The method of claim 7 comprising:establishing a priority status for
each user in the queue according to the time of license acceptance, with
an earlier license acceptance time having priority over a later license
acceptance time.

9. The method of claim 6 comprising:permitting users to search and rank by
relevancy without restriction the second-level elements of the database
without permitting visual access to the second-level elements.

10. The method of claim 1 comprising:enabling each originator to review
the identity of each license requesting user and to either accept or
reject the license request by each user.

11. A method of using a computer to facilitate and control sequential
access to a two-level information database created by inputs supplied by
originators comprising:receiving and storing in the database a plurality
of two-part descriptions each supplied by an originator, each two-part
description including a nonconfidential first-level element in the form
of a searchable and accessible basic description of an originator's
entry, and a confidential second-level element in the form of a
searchable, but not accessible detailed description of each originator's
entry;permitting users to access and select without restriction, only the
nonconfidential first-level elements of the stored two-part
descriptions;providing selecting users with an option to access, search
and review the confidential second-level elements of the stored two-part
descriptions that correspond to the selected first-level elements by
electronically submitting to each selecting user a license agreement
including a confidentiality provision;receiving and storing in the
computer an acceptance of the license agreement by each selecting user;
andupon receipt of license acceptance, providing accepting users with
unrestricted access on a confidential basis via the computer to the
confidential second-level elements of the stored two-part descriptions
corresponding to the selected first-level elements.

12. The method of claim 11 where the license agreement further comprises
other previously supplied licensing terms.

13. The method of claim 11 comprising:upon receiving license acceptance by
one selecting user, subsequently restricting other users from accessing
or searching both the first-level and second-level elements, of the
two-part description selected by the licensed user for the duration of
the term of the exclusive license.

14. The method of claim 11 comprising:creating a queue of license
accepting users seeking access to the selected, but license restricted
second-level element.

15. The method of claim 14 comprising:establishing a priority status for
each user in the queue according to the time of license acceptance, with
an earlier license acceptance time having priority over a later license
acceptance time.

16. The method of claim 11 comprising:enabling each originator to review
the identity of each license requesting user and to either accept or
reject the license request by each user.

17. The method of claim 11 wherein the license agreement is a limited
duration, exclusive license.

18. The method of claim 11 comprising:upon receiving license acceptance by
one selecting user, subsequently restricting other users from visually
accessing the second-level element but permitting the other users to
continue to access and select the first-level element for the duration of
the license term.

19. A method of using a computer to facilitate and control sequential
access to a two-level information database created by inputs supplied by
originators comprising:receiving and storing in the database a plurality
of two-part descriptions each supplied by an originator, each two-part
description including a nonconfidential first-level element in the form
of a searchable and accessible basic description of an originator's
entry, and a confidential second-level element in the form of a
searchable, but not accessible detailed description of each originator's
entry;permitting users to access and select without restriction, only the
nonconfidential first-level elements of the stored two-part
descriptions;providing selecting users with an option to access, search
and review the confidential second-level elements of the stored two-part
descriptions that correspond to the selected first-level elements by
electronically submitting to each selecting user a license agreement
including a confidentiality provision;receiving and storing in the
computer an acceptance of the license agreement by each selecting
user;upon receipt of license acceptance, providing accepting users with
unrestricted access on a confidential basis via the computer to the
confidential second-level elements of the stored two-part descriptions
corresponding to the selected first-level elements; andupon receiving
license acceptance by one selecting user, subsequently restricting other
users from visually accessing the second-level element but permitting the
other users to continue to access and select the first-level element for
the duration of the license term.

20. The method of claim 19 comprising:creating a queue of license
accepting users seeking access to the selected, but license restricted
second-level element.

Description:

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

[0001]This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application
Ser. No. 11/926,626, filed Oct. 29, 2007 and issued as U.S. Pat. No.
7,734,552 on Jun. 8, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. Nos. 11/379,926, 11/379,930, and 11/379,935, all filed
Apr. 24, 2006, which are continuations of U.S. patent application Ser.
No. 10/854,653, filed May 24, 2004, which is a continuation of U.S.
patent application Ser. No. 09/747,748, filed Dec. 22, 2000, which claims
the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application 60/173,170, filed Dec.
27, 1999, which are incorporated by reference along with all other
references cited in this application.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002]The method and apparatus of the present invention relate to
electronic contract applications using electronic networks.

[0003]Innovation in the past two decades has been unprecedented.
Innovation is important in facilitating economic growth, enhancing
standards of living, spreading creativity, and the arts. Today, the
Internet is the fastest growing communications tool in the history of the
world; tomorrow, the Internet will be the primary communications tool for
the entire world. Full-time instantaneous access to every waking person:
this is the future. With the Internet, ideas may be communicated between
parties more quickly.

[0004]With the ease of the communication of ideas today and in the future
through the Internet or other similar communications networks and
mediums, there are also shortcomings. Innovators worry that their ideas
might be misappropriated or nonconfidentially disclosed. People who
require innovations do not have a place to solicit other's ideas or
confidentially list their requirements. These are just some of the many
shortcomings of communicating ideas over a medium such as the Internet.

[0005]Furthermore, the deficiencies in the prior art include, but are not
limited to, lack of standardized commercial and contractual
relationships; lack of industry and trade practices applicable across a
multitude of industry segments; lack of clear submission criteria; lack
of binding, universally applicable confidential disclosure means; lack of
efficient and accessible enforcement means; inability to identify
accurately likely users capable of implementing the idea or innovation;
uncertainty in legal obligations between originator and user; the
inability to identify relevant ideas prior to gaining access to a fully
disclosed idea; and inability to identify relevant ideas prior to gaining
access to a fully disclosed idea.

[0006]Current user-driven innovation transfer protocols are likewise
limited in application. Companies of all sizes and in all industries face
the same problem--how to access effectively and efficiently externally
and internally generated innovation without the attendant unmanageable
exposure to potential liability for alleged misappropriation. Users
desiring access to externally (i.e., innovation generated by
nonemployees) and internally (innovation generated by employees and
consultants) generated innovation face significant barriers, transaction
costs, and legal liability.

[0007]With respect to externally generated ideas, users often lack the
resources and expertise required to filter and screen efficiently
external, unsolicited idea submissions. Users fear that originators who
have submitted ideas to them may later claim that the user's
implementation of similar concepts or ideas are substantially similar to,
based on, or are derivatives of those ideas disclosed to the user by the
originator. Users fear that a user's independently created innovation may
be subject to legal claims of originators who previously have submitted
similar ideas to the user. The key to facilitating submission of
innovation originated outside the organization is creating an innovation
transfer tool that effectively and efficiently manages the flow of
innovation and the legal relationship between originator and user.

[0008]With respect to internally generated ideas, originators often lack
sufficient compensatory incentives to disclose potentially valuable
ideas. Existing proprietary innovation transfer protocols for the
transfer of internally generated innovation typically consist of little
more than a suggestion box in which employee originators are asked to
submit ideas (e.g., cost savings methods, new business methods, product
or service improvements, business opportunities, advertising slogans,
etc.) for use by the employer user. Typically, employer users will
implement a nonbinding policy whereby the employer user indicates that,
while it shall not be under any legal obligation to compensate the
employee originator for the use or implementation of the employee
originator's idea, the employer user will gratuitously compensate the
employee originator for submitted ideas that impart significant value to
the employer user. The gratuitous compensation is generally subject to an
upper-limit and is determined in the sole discretion of the employer
user. As a result, such idea submission programs and innovation transfer
protocols fail to provide adequate incentive for employee originators to
develop and disclose potentially valuable ideas and are necessarily
unilateral and nonbinding. The present invention addresses the
deficiencies in the prior art by empowering employee originators with the
ability to negotiate at arms length with employer users as to the
"reasonable compensation" to be paid for the employer user's use of the
idea. The present invention allows for and facilitates bilateral commerce
in employee-originator developed ideas.

[0009]The deficiencies in the prior art include the inability of smaller
businesses and individuals to communicate globally to potential
originators confidential RFPs; the inability of originators to search
efficiently and effectively for relevant RFPs; the inability of smaller
organizations or individuals to identify efficiently and effectively
willing originators and to obtain and access proposals and potential
solutions; and the inability of originators to communicate efficiently
and effectively proposed solutions globally and confidentially to smaller
organizations and individuals.

[0010]Therefore, there is a need to utilize the power of the Internet and
to allow for the implementation of a unique business model to manage
effectively and efficiently a marketplace for raw ideas--in short, to
manage innovation. There is need to allow novice and expert innovators
alike to present confidentially or nonconfidentially their ideas,
innovations and inventions directly or globally to individuals and
companies capable of implementing the innovation and possessing the
resources needed to exploit the opportunity.

[0011]As can be seen, a method and apparatus are needed to provide an
electronic marketplace of ideas and confidential ideas over a network or
system like the Internet.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0012]The present invention is a method and apparatus for effectuating
bilateral commerce in ideas. The present invention is both an originator-
and user-driven on-line commercial network system designed to facilitate
idea submission, purchase, and licensing and is easily adapted to
business-to-business (B2B) transfers of innovation as well as
consumer-to-business (C2B) transfers of innovation. The invention allows
originators of ideas to communicate nondisclosing synopses of ideas
directly or globally to potential users, for users conveniently to search
for relevant ideas and for users potentially to bind an originator to a
license granting the user the right to access and consider confidentially
the originator's fully disclosed idea. The invention also allows users to
communicate confidentially or nonconfidentially unsolved problems or
needs globally to potential originators, for originators conveniently to
search for relevant unsolved problems or needs and for originators to
submit and communicate confidentially proposed solutions to the
soliciting user.

[0013]In one embodiment, the apparatus of the present invention includes a
controller that receives ideas from originators. The controller
classifies the ideas according to topic, industry, intended user, or
other characteristic or input variable and makes a nondisclosing synopsis
(summary or description) of the ideas available individually and/or
globally to one or more potential users. Potential users have the option
to review all nondisclosing synopses or define relevant search criteria
that is utilized by the controller's search engine to search the fully
disclosed idea database and display relevant nondisclosing synopses with
a corresponding relevancy rank. Potential users may access the fully
disclosed idea that corresponds to the chosen nondisclosing synopsis and
thereby bind both the user and the originator to a license agreement
granting the user the right to access and consider the fully disclosed
idea on the terms contained in the license. The relevancy rank allows
potential users to access only relevant fully disclosed ideas and rank or
prioritize the nondisclosing synopses that seem to meet the potential
user's criteria. In this manner, users do not have to access those fully
disclosed ideas for which the user has no desire to review and consider,
thus reducing any potential exposure to liability for misappropriation
with respect to fully disclosed ideas not accessed by the user.

[0014]In an alternative embodiment, the user is not granted access to the
fully disclosed idea unless and until the originator grants the
identifiable user access. In this embodiment, the user, upon attempting
to access the fully disclosed idea, is informed by the system that
authorization from the corresponding originator is required. The user is
then requested by the system to input identifying and other required
information. The corresponding originator is notified by the central
controller that a user desires access to the fully disclosed idea. The
notification contains the relevant identifying and other information
about the user. If the originator does not wish this particular user to
access the fully disclosed idea, the user is informed by the central
controller that access has been denied. If the originator approves of the
user, the user is notified by the central controller that access has been
granted.

[0015]In one embodiment, the apparatus of the present invention includes a
controller that receives ideas from originators. The controller
classifies the ideas according to topic, industry, intended user or other
characteristic or input variable and makes a nondisclosing synopsis
(summary or description) of the ideas available globally to potential
users. Potential users then have the option to access the fully disclosed
ideas and thereby bind both the user and the originator to a license
granting the user the right to access and consider the fully disclosed
idea according to the terms of the license agreement. Users desiring to
commercially exploit or otherwise utilize the originator's fully
disclosed idea will negotiate directly with the originator for an
exclusive or nonexclusive license, option, preemptive right or assignment
of the idea utilizing current chat, voice-telephony or other
electronically or web-enabled communication means.

[0016]In another embodiment, the apparatus of the present invention
includes a controller that receives detailed descriptions of users' unmet
needs or unsolved problems. The controller classifies the unmet needs or
unsolved problems according to topic, industry, intended originator, or
other characteristic or input variable and makes a nondisclosing synopsis
(summary or description) of the unmet needs or unsolved problems
available directly or globally to potential users. Potential originators
have the option to access the fully disclosed unmet needs or unsolved
problems and thereby bind both the user and the originator to a license
granting the originator the right to access and consider the fully
disclosed unmet need or unsolved problem according to the terms of the
license agreement. Originators desiring to propose solutions to the
soliciting users' unmet needs or unsolved problems will submit to the
central controller or directly to the soliciting users, proposed
solutions to the users' unmet needs or unsolved problems. Such proposed
solutions are submitted and communicated to the soliciting users in the
same manner described above for originators submitting ideas. Soliciting
users then access the originator's proposed solution in the same manner
described above for users accessing ideas of originators. Users desiring
to implement or otherwise use an originator's proposed solution will
negotiate directly with the originator to determine the terms of use
and/or implementation utilizing current chat, voice-telephony or other
electronically or web-enabled communication means.

[0017]The method and apparatus of the present invention have applications
on the Internet as well as conventional communications systems such as
voice telephony and facsimile.

[0018]In one originator-driven embodiment of this invention,
communications between originators and users are conducted using an
electronic network and central controller. An originator who desires to
post, license or sell an idea accesses the central controller located on
a remote server; The originator submits electronically the fully
disclosed idea ("FDI"), creates a nondisclosing synopsis of the idea
("NDS(FDI)"), and specifies the subject matter of the idea that he or she
desires to be posted and/or the intended user whom the originator
believes to have a particular interest in and/or use for the originator's
FDI.

[0019]For example, a typical FDI might be an original screenplay for a
feature-length comedy. The specified subject matter would be "motion
picture" and a potential intended user would be Universal Studios. The
originator of the screenplay would submit to the central controller the
entire screenplay in text format or as an electronic file attachment such
as a Microsoft Word document file. The originator would then, with the
assistance of standardized submission guidelines, electronic submission
forms, helpful on-line hints and current artificial intelligence
technology, create a nondisclosing synopsis of the screenplay comprising
a log line or brief summary of its key components, intended to disclose
only enough of the screenplay's substance as is necessary to entice
potential users (e.g., studio executives or motion picture producers).
This nondisclosing synopsis may be in text form, video, audio,
interactive hypertext or other media capable of electronic transmission.
The originator may, but is not required to, input or communicate to the
central controller additional information such as the originator's
identity, originator's qualifications and credits, reserve price or other
conditions the originator may require. For example, the originator may be
an experienced and well-known screenwriter and may wish to disclose
originator's identity and film credits. Originator may also designate a
minimum reserve price, which in the movie industry may be the minimum
option price for the script or screenplay.

[0020]Originator then attaches an originator identification (such as user
name and password) to the FDI and transmits the FDI, NDS(FDI) and other
disclosed information to the central controller. Under the present
invention, the FDI, NDS(FDI) and other information may be transmitted via
numerous means including a world-wide-web interface, electronic mail,
voice mail, facsimile, courier or postal mail. Prior to accepting the
FDI, NDS(FDI) and other information, central controller communicates the
terms of a standardized submission agreement to the originator. If the
originator refuses the terms of the submission agreement, the FDI,
NDS(FDI), and other information is returned to the originator and no
further action is taken by central controller. If the originator agrees
to the terms of the submission agreement, central controller assigns an
originator identification number unique to the specified originator and a
unique tracking number to that originator's FDI. The FDI is communicated
to and retained in a secure FDI database. Before communicating the
NDS(FDI) and other information to potential users, central controller
authenticates the originator's identification number against an
originator database. The central controller then assigns a unique
tracking number to the NDS(FDI) and other information which corresponds
to the FDI tracking number and globally displays the NDS(FDI) and other
information in a manner that is available to be viewed by any interested
potential users.

[0021]In an alternative embodiment, the NDS(FDI) and other information is
displayed solely to one or more intended users. NDS(FDI)s may be
displayed by subject, industry or other category to make it easier for
potential users to identify relevant NDS(FDI)s. Thus, a user could log
onto a web site, for example, and see a listing of NDS(FDI) subject,
industry or other categories. The user could then choose a particular
category and have the ability to browse available NDS(FDI)s that
correspond to such category. In an alternative embodiment, users can use
artificial intelligence protocols and search engines to identify relevant
NDS(FDI)s. In one embodiment, users may be required to provide
qualifications in order to view the NDS(FDI)s in a given category.

[0022]If, after reviewing a particular NDS(FDI), a potential user wishes
to access the corresponding FDI, that user communicates this intent to
the central controller. Upon receipt by central controller of user's
response, central controller communicates to user the terms of access as
provided in an on-line license agreement granting user the right to
review and consider the FDI. If user refuses the terms of the license
agreement, access to the FDI is denied by central controller. If user
agrees to the terms of the license agreement, central controller
time-stamps user's response and authenticates user's identity and user's
qualifications to determine if user's qualifications meet any conditions
imposed by the originator as to which users may obtain access to the FDI.
The system then verifies that the NDS(FDI) is still "active" and that the
FDI is capable of being accessed. If user meets all conditions, central
controller communicates the FDI to user and changes status of the
corresponding FDI to "licensed." Central controller assigns a unique
tracking number to user's response and stores it in a user response
database. In one embodiment subsequent users will be able to access a
"licensed" FDI. In another embodiment the user that licensed the FDI is
granted an unlimited period of time in which to review and consider the
FDI. Central controller then communicates a license confirmation to the
originator and the user.

[0023]In one embodiment, the originator may specify that access to an FDI
be limited to one user at a time. In this embodiment, the accessing user
is given a limited period of time to review and consider the FDI (e.g.,
48 hours). In the event that the accessing user decides not to license,
purchase or otherwise acquire the rights to the FDI, the accessing user
is denied further access and the FDI is made available to a subsequent
user for exclusive review and consideration.

[0024]If a user desires to obtain the right to use the FDI or otherwise an
option, license, preemptive right, or assignment of the FDI, that user
proposes terms of an FDI transfer agreement and communicates the offer to
central controller. Central controller receives proposed FDI transfer
agreement and assigns a unique tracking number. FDI transfer agreement
status is set to "active." FDI transfer agreement is stored in FDI
transfer agreement database and then transmitted to the originator for
review and consideration. If originator does not bind user by accepting
the proposed terms of the FDI transfer agreement, FDI transfer agreement
is transmitted back to user and status of the FDI transfer agreement
changes to "completed." User may then submit subsequent proposed FDI
transfer agreements using the same procedure as outlined above. If
originator binds, the originator communicates acceptance of the FDI
transfer agreement to central controller and status of the FDI transfer
agreement changes to "completed."

[0025]In another embodiment, the terms of an FDI transfer agreement are
specified by the originator and included in the FDI transmitted to the
user. If user agrees to the terms of transfer and/or terms of use
proposed by originator in the FDI, user communicates acceptance to
central controller. Central controller time-stamps user's response and
authenticates user's identity and qualifications. The central controller
then assigns a tracking number to user's response, and user's response is
stored in an FDI transfer agreement database. At this point, user and
originator are parties to legally binding agreement.

[0026]In another embodiment, the central controller automatically manages
the payment system between user and originator. Various methods of
payments may be utilized by the invention, including credit cards,
personal checks, electronic funds transfer, debit cards, digital cash,
etc. The payment system may also involve the use of an escrow account
associated with the user wherein funds advanced by the user to cover the
FDI transfer price agreed to in the FDI transfer agreement can be kept
pending delivery of FDI and performance of any obligations by originator
as provided in the FDI transfer agreement.

[0027]The present invention is therefore a highly effective and efficient
bilateral originator-driven commerce system. It improves the ability of
originators to reach users desiring access to and use of originators'
FDIs and improves users' ability to identify relevant FDIs.

[0028]The present invention has further user-driven applications in the
form of the posting of unmet needs and unsolved problems. Current needs
posting protocols are limited in application and usefulness.

[0029]Successful implementation of existing needs posting protocols
requires complete, up-front disclosure of the unmet need or unsolved
problem. The present invention allows for and facilitates the posting of
a nondisclosing synopsis of the unmet need or unsolved problem as well as
posting of a nondisclosing synopsis of the proposed solution.

[0030]In one user-driven embodiment of this invention, a user who desires
to post a request for proposal comprising a fully disclosed unmet need or
unsolved problem ("RFP") accesses the central controller located on a
remote server. The user electronically submits the RFP, creates a
nondisclosing synopsis of the RFP ("NDS(RFP)") and specifies the subject
matter of the RFP desired to be posted and/or the intended originator
whom the user believes is capable of proposing solutions to the user's
RFP. For example, a typical RFP might be a request for method for
formation of crystalline metal oxides at low temperatures. The specified
subject matter would be chemical process and a potential intended
originator would be the University of New Mexico.

[0031]The present invention is therefore a highly effective and efficient
bilateral user-driven commerce system that improves the ability of users
to reach originators capable of satisfying users' unmet needs and
unsolved problems and improves originators' ability to identify relevant
RFPs and submit FDIs comprising a solution to users' RFPs.

[0032]The present invention can also be practiced in off-line embodiments
rather than electronic mail or web-based servers. Originators and users
may communicate with central controller via telephone, facsimile,
courier, postal mail or other off-line communications tools. For example,
an originator may use a courier to submit FDIs and NDS(FDI)s to central
controller which then compiles a list of available NDS(FDI)s for
distribution via courier to potential users. Users interested in a
relevant NDS(FDI) and desiring access to a corresponding FDI may
communicate a request to central controller which, after communicating
the license agreement to user and receiving user's acceptance of the
license agreement terms, delivers the FDI to user via courier.

[0033]In another on-line embodiment, cryptographic protocols are used to
authenticate the identity of originators and/or users and verify the
integrity of originator and user communications with the central
controller. Using cryptography and biometrics, the central controller can
make it significantly more difficult for unauthorized persons to tamper
with the system by passing themselves off as legitimate originators and
users or intercepting and/or eavesdropping on system communications.

[0034]What the present invention accomplishes, which no previous system
has done before, is to create an effective and efficient marketplace for
confidential information.

[0035]The applicant is unaware of the existence of any commercially viable
bilateral user- and originator-driven commercial systems that incorporate
the above features and address the deficiencies of the prior art.
Therefore, it is one objective of the present invention to allow
originators of ideas to communicate confidentially or nonconfidentially
nondisclosing synopses of ideas globally to potential users, for users
conveniently to search for relevant ideas and for users potentially to
bind an originator to a license granting the user the right to access and
consider the originator's fully disclosed idea.

[0036]The present invention allows users to communicate confidentially or
nonconfidentially nondisclosing synopses of RFPs globally to potential
originators, for originators conveniently to search for relevant RFPs and
for originators potentially to bind a user to a license granting the user
the right to access and consider the user's fully disclosed RFP.

[0037]The present invention allows employee and nonemployee originators to
communicate confidentially or nonconfidentially nondisclosing synopses of
ideas directly to relevant and intended users and to enable such users
conveniently to search for and access both internally and externally
generated relevant ideas and for users potentially to bind an originator
to a license granting the user the right to access and consider the
originator's fully disclosed idea.

[0038]The present invention allows for effective and efficient idea
transfer management to be utilized by originators and users alike.

[0039]The present invention substantially reduces transaction and search
costs associated with idea transfer transactions to enable more
innovation to emerge in the marketplace.

[0041]The present invention provides a negotiating means to allow the
originator and user to negotiate the terms of the extended option,
purchase, assignment or license of a fully disclosed idea.

[0042]In an embodiment, the invention is a method of using a computer to
conduct a transaction between a user and an originator. A basic
description and a corresponding detailed description of the user's unmet
need or unsolved problem are input into the computer. The originator is
permitted to access the basic description of the user's unmet needs or
unsolved problems. For the basic description, the originator is provided
an option to access the corresponding detailed description by agreeing to
an on-line license agreement. The originator inputs into the computer an
indication of agreement the on-line license agreement. The originator is
provided with access via the computer to the corresponding detailed
description. The on-line license agreement may have be a limited
duration, exclusive license. After the originator has indicated agreement
to the on-line license agreement, other potential originators are
disallowed from accessing the basic description and corresponding
description for the duration of the license agreement. The corresponding
detailed description may be stored in the computer in encrypted form. The
originator is provided with an access key to decrypt the corresponding
detailed description after agreeing to the license agreement.

[0043]In another embodiment, the invention is a method of using a computer
to conduct a transaction between an originator and a user. A basic
description and a corresponding detailed description of the originator's
proposal are input into the computer. The user is permitted to access the
basic description of the originator's proposal. For the basic
description, the user is provided an option to access the corresponding
detailed description by agreeing to an on-line license agreement. The
user inputs into the computer an indication of agreement to the on-line
license agreement. And, the originator is provided with access via the
computer to the corresponding detailed description. The originator's
proposal is submitted in response to the user's unmet need or unsolved
problem inputted and accessed using the computer. The on-line license
agreement may be a limited duration, exclusive license. After the user
has indicated agreement to the on-line license agreement, other potential
users are disallowed from accessing the basic description and
corresponding description for the duration of the license agreement. The
corresponding detailed description may be stored in the computer in
encrypted form. The user is provided with an access key to decrypt the
corresponding description after agreeing to the license agreement.

[0044]In another embodiment, the invention is an apparatus to facilitate
transactions between a user and an originator. A computer includes a
processor and storage device. A computer program causes the computer to
store using the storage device a basic description and a corresponding
detailed description of the user's unmet needs or unsolved problems. The
computer program causes the computer to allow the originator to access
the basic description of the user's unmet needs or unsolved problems. The
computer program causes the computer to allow the originator to access
the corresponding detailed description by agreeing to an on-line license
agreement.

[0045]In another embodiment, the invention is an apparatus to facilitate
transactions between a user and an originator. A computer including a
processor and storage devices. A computer program causes the computer to
store using the storage device a basic description and a corresponding
detailed description of the originator's proposal. The computer program
causes the computer to allow the user to access the basic description of
the originator's proposal. The computer program causes the computer to
allow the user to access the corresponding detailed description by
agreeing to an on-line license agreement.

[0046]These and other features and embodiments of the present invention
will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed
description of the invention, the accompanying drawings and the claims.
The present invention provides efficient idea and intellectual asset
submission, storage, distribution, screening, tracking and scoring. The
present invention facilitates identification of relevant ideas prior to
viewing an FDI to reduce the likelihood of a user accessing irrelevant
ideas or accessing ideas already under development, previously considered
or independently developed by the accessing user.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0047]FIG. 1a illustrates an originator-driven embodiment of the present
invention.

[0048]FIG. 1b illustrates a user-driven embodiment of the present
invention.

[0049]FIG. 2 shows one embodiment of the central controller.

[0050]FIG. 3 shows one embodiment of the user interface.

[0051]FIG. 4 shows one embodiment of the originator interface.

[0052]FIG. 5a depicts an originator-driven embodiment showing the
submission of a fully disclosed idea, the creation of a nondisclosing
synopsis, and use of a submission agreement.

[0053]FIG. 5b depicts a user-driven embodiment showing the submission of a
fully disclosed request for proposal, the creation of a nondisclosing
synopsis, and use of a submission agreement.

[0054]FIG. 6a depicts an embodiment showing acceptance of an NDS(FDI) by
the central controller.

[0055]FIG. 6b depicts an embodiment showing acceptance of an NDS(RFP) by
the central controller.

[0056]FIG. 7a depicts an embodiment showing the activation of an NDS(FDI).

[0057]FIG. 7b depicts an embodiment showing the activation of an NDS(RFP).

[0058]FIG. 8a depicts an embodiment of the maintenance of active
NDS(FDI)s.

[0059]FIG. 8b depicts an embodiment of the maintenance of active
NDS(RFP)s.

[0060]FIG. 9a depicts an embodiment showing a user selecting an NDS(FDI),
accepting the terms of a license agreement and accessing the associated
FDI.

[0061]FIG. 9b depicts an embodiment showing an originator selecting an
NDS(RFP), accepting the terms of a license agreement and accessing the
associated RFP.

[0062]FIGS. 10a and 11a depict an embodiment showing the binding of a user
to the license agreement upon selecting an NDS(FDI) for further review as
required to access the corresponding FDI.

[0063]FIGS. 10b and 11b depict an embodiment showing the binding of an
originator to the license agreement upon selecting an NDS(RFP) for
further review as required to access the corresponding RFP.

[0064]FIG. 12a depicts a procedure for transferring the right to use the
FDI to user.

[0065]FIG. 12b depicts a procedure for proposing a solution to user's RFP
to user.

[0069]FIGS. 18a and 19 depict an embodiment for proposing terms regarding
the transferring of the right to use an FDI to user and for transferring
the right to use the FDI to user.

[0070]FIG. 18b depicts the method for an originator to submit a proposed
solution to user's RFP, which solution comprises an FDI.

[0071]FIG. 20 depicts an embodiment showing the use of a trusted server
and a bonding agency.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0072]The present invention is a method and apparatus for effectuating
bilateral commerce in ideas. The present invention is both an originator-
and user-driven on-line commercial network system designed to facilitate
idea submission, purchase and licensing and is easily adapted to
business-to-business transfers of innovation as well as
consumer-to-business transfers of innovation. The invention allows
originators of ideas to communicate nondisclosing synopses of ideas
directly or globally to potential users, for users conveniently to search
for relevant ideas and for users potentially to bind an originator to a
license granting the user the right to access and consider confidentially
the originator's fully disclosed idea. The invention also allows users to
communicate confidentially or nonconfidentially unsolved problems or
needs globally to potential originators, for originators conveniently to
search for relevant unsolved problems or needs and for originators to
submit and communicate confidentially proposed solutions to the
soliciting user.

[0073]By creating an Internet-based marketplace for ideas and confidential
information, the present invention will allow companies of all sizes and
in all industries to identify and directly access internally and
externally generated innovation in a manner that (i) enables
consideration of only relevant innovation, (ii) yields greater return on
investment, and (iii) reduces search and transfer transaction costs

[0074]The present invention recognizes and embraces the power of the
Internet and will allow for the implementation of a unique business model
to manage effectively and efficiently a marketplace for raw ideas--in
short, to manage innovation. The present invention's web-enabled
innovation transfer management protocol will allow novice and expert
innovators alike to present confidentially or nonconfidentially their
ideas, innovations and inventions directly or globally to individuals and
companies capable of implementing the innovation and possessing the
resources needed to exploit the opportunity. By creating an
Internet-based marketplace for ideas and confidential information, the
present invention will allow companies of all sizes and in all industries
to identify and directly access internally and externally generated
innovation in a manner that (i) enables consideration of only relevant
innovation, (ii) yields greater return on investment, and (iii) reduces
search and transfer transaction costs.

[0075]It has been said that ideas are to the Information Age what iron ore
and other raw materials were to the Industrial Age--only you can't put a
fence around ideas. Well, now you can. The present invention offers
innovators the fence needed to protect their raw ideas.

[0076]The present invention allows what no previous commercial system has
ever achieved--instantaneous access to the collective innovation of the
global community. While the present invention allows for seamless,
business-to-business and consumer-to-business transfers of fully
developed innovation, the truly amazing and far-reaching component of the
innovation transfer management protocol is that by lowering transaction
costs associated with innovation transfer transactions, the system will
enable even the smallest seed of innovative effort to be directed to a
relevant user. Individuals and businesses that do not currently have
incentive to incur the expense of gaining access to users of their
innovation (i.e., cost of gaining access is too high and likelihood of
success is too low), will now have the opportunity to present the
innovation to potential users by incurring only nominal expense.
Individuals and consumers will use the system to post and pitch ideas,
inventions, product improvements, advertising slogans, sitcom episode
treatments, movie concepts and treatments, toy design concepts, book
ideas and manuscripts, game concepts, etc. Small to medium-sized
businesses will use the system to post and pitch unimplemented innovation
(i.e., opportunities they are unable to pursue but that have value for
another user), to gain access to innovation and also to post descriptions
of unmet needs and unsolved problems (Request for Proposal--"RFP") as a
low-cost alternative to management and advertising consulting. Larger
businesses will use the system to post and pitch unimplemented
innovation, to gain access to new innovation, to reduce reliance on
internal research and development, to post RFPs and to establish internal
and external innovation transfer tools.

[0077]Undeveloped ideas are generally not protectable under Patent,
Copyright or Trademark law. Undeveloped ideas are not patentable because
they have yet to be reduced to practice, and ideas, whether developed or
undeveloped, are not legally copyrightable or trademarkable. Copyright
protection is directed towards the expression of the idea and not the
idea itself. Trademark protection simply allows the owner of a mark used
to identify the owner's goods or services to prevent others from using
the same or confusingly similar mark to identify the source of similar
goods or services. While ideas are generally protected under Trade Secret
Law, the ideas lose protectibility upon disclosure, unless disclosed for
limited purposes and to a limited number of persons and only if subject
to a confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement. Furthermore, trade
secret protection will not be available once the idea is brought to
market or otherwise placed within the public domain. In general, a trade
secret is anything and everything useful or advantageous in business
activity but not generally known or easily ascertainable by others in the
trade. Therefore, undisclosed, novel ideas not otherwise within the
public domain are protectible under Trade Secret Law. Ideas within the
public domain are never capable of protection under Trade Secret Law.

[0078]Developed ideas (e.g., reduced to practice) may not be patentable if
they are not novel and/or are obvious extensions of the prior art.
Nonnovel and obvious developed ideas may still be protectible under Trade
Secret Law (provided they are not within the public domain), but such
protection is necessarily subject to the same limitations as is
protection for undeveloped ideas. Namely, once disclosed, such ideas
often lose their protection.

[0079]Limited protection is available, however, for all ideas (whether in
the public domain, disclosed or undisclosed) under a developing area of
law commonly referred to as the Law of Undeveloped Ideas. Such protection
is limited because the protection is applicable only as between
contracting parties. This body of law enforces contractual obligations to
pay the originator of a creative idea for its use. He who takes the
benefit must take the burden. The benefit in the case of idea disclosure
is access to the originator's ideas; the burden is that if the user
decides to implement the originator's idea, the user must pay for such
use.

[0080]The Law of Undeveloped Ideas is somewhat of a misnomer, as the legal
principles are applicable to developed and undeveloped ideas. The Law of
Undeveloped Ideas is a miscellaneous accumulation of state common-law
decisions addressing a claimed right to compensation for a defendant's
unauthorized use of the plaintiff's idea. California, in part due to the
prevalence of the entertainment industry, is leading the development of
the principles under the Law of Undeveloped Ideas.

[0081]It is common practice in the motion picture, radio, television and
other industries for originators to conceive and submit ideas for sale
before developing a concrete literary composition or reducing the
invention to practice. For example, it is customary for screenwriters or
other creators to submit stories, central themes, treatments and dramatic
cores to producers and studios with the accepted understanding that such
submissions are for a limited and confidential purpose and that use will
not be made thereof unless there is appropriate payment by the producer
or studio.

[0082]Another common example is evident in the toy industry. It is common
practice in the toy industry for toy developers to "pitch" their ideas
and concepts to toy marketing companies prior to reduction to practice.
If the toy company likes the idea and anticipates commercial application,
it will pay an advance to the developer either (i) to secure immediately
the exclusive marketing rights to products embodying the concept or idea,
or (ii) to option the concept or idea and provide funds to the originator
to develop a "proof of concept" or prototype. The scope of the idea is
intentionally broad to cover all variations and derivative products
resulting from or inspired by the original idea. The toy company is
paying the originator for the first opportunity to bring the idea to
market and obtain exclusive marketing rights to the initial product and
derivatives thereof. In exchange for this "first mover" opportunity, the
toy company agrees to pay a royalty on all products sold deriving from
the original idea.

[0083]Under California law, an originator can prevail in an action to
recover compensation for use of an idea if (i) before or after disclosure
the originator has obtained from the user an express promise to pay for
use of the idea, or (ii) the circumstances preceding and attending the
disclosure of the idea indicate an implied promise whereby the originator
has clearly conditioned his offer to disclose the idea upon an obligation
to pay for it if it is used by the user, and the user, knowing the
condition before the idea is disclosed by the originator, voluntarily
accepts and uses the idea.

[0084]Under California law, there is no requirement that the idea be
"novel" or "reduced to a concrete form." Even though an idea may be
common or open to public knowledge, its disclosure is sufficient
consideration for the promise to pay for its use upon disclosure. The
concepts of "novelty" and "concreteness" speak to the value of the idea
and not its protectibility under contract law. A proven idea is
necessarily more valuable than an unproven idea; however, the disclosure
of either can be consideration for a contract to pay for its use. The Law
of Undeveloped Ideas seeks to protect originators who, in attempting to
market, exploit or sell their ideas, must disclose them to potential
users. It encourages the development and exploitation of those items of
lesser or different invention than might be accorded protection under the
patent laws, but which items still have an important part to play in the
technological, artistic and scientific advancement of the human race.
Essentially, Trade Secret Law and the Law of Undeveloped Ideas promote
the sharing of knowledge and innovation, and the efficient operation of
industry; these laws permit the originator to reap the rewards of
his/her/its labor by contracting with a company possessing the necessary
resources to develop and exploit it. While trade secret protection is
generally lost upon nonconfidential disclosure, the Law of Undeveloped
Ideas will enforce contractual obligations between an originator and a
user even after the idea is made known to the public at large. This is
because the user was given a particular competitive advantage in being
the first to consider and exploit the originator's idea.

[0085]Individuals and companies frequently stumble upon ideas, innovations
and business opportunities that have a positive net present value; the
problem is that these individuals and companies lack adequate resources
and/or core competencies to exploit the opportunities. The opportunity
may be in an industry segment with which the individual or business is
not familiar, or the originator may lack adequate capital, business
experience, entrepreneurial ambition or market position to successfully
develop, implement and exploit the idea, concept or innovation. In
addition, larger firms often pass on positive net present value
innovations for a myriad of reasons, including (i) development is outside
the company's core competencies; (ii) development and implementation of a
new concept does not fit with the company's strategic plan; (iii)
inadequate current resources; (iv) higher priority opportunities; and (v)
lack of leadership and passion. Thus, the originator frequently tries to
interest larger or better-positioned companies in developing and
exploiting his or her ideas in an arrangement that enables all parties to
share equitably in any successes attributable to the idea. Contact and
communication between an originator and a user, however, is costly and
may raise potential problems and significant legal risks for each party.

[0086]For example, (i) an employee may disclose an inventive idea for a
new product to his employer, who then begins to manufacture and sell the
new product but refuses to pay the employee for the idea; (ii) an
individual may submit an advertising slogan or campaign concept to a
retail store or manufacturer, expecting compensation upon use, but
receives nothing; (iii) a writer presents a plan for a television series
or a plot summary for an episode of a current sitcom to a television
producer who turns it down but then incorporates the idea in a later
series without paying the originator; or (iv) an applicant for employment
with a company in the course of interviewing, discloses a new business
method, and later finds out that the company has implemented the new
method, but the company refuses to hire the applicant/originator or pay
for the information.

[0087]Companies of all sizes and in all industries face the same
problem--how to access effectively and efficiently externally and
internally generated innovation without unmanageable exposure to
potential liability. Current processes for idea and innovation
submission, if available at all, are cumbersome, costly to administer and
unpredictable. Furthermore, because current idea submission protocols
impose nonconfidential submission criteria and ineffective enforcement
mechanisms, innovators lack adequate compensatory incentives to submit
valuable ideas to relevant users. Companies face the problem of
identifying users of their products or services who may have valuable
suggestions regarding improvements, new products or services, more
efficient distribution or sales methods, etc. Current methods include
consumer focus groups, consumer surveys, consumer response cards and
other costly and ineffective processes. Even if a company is able to
identify innovative consumers, they lack an effective means of
encouraging disclosure of the innovation and managing the transfer of the
innovation.

[0088]There are many different innovation transfer protocols in use today,
whether implemented via the Internet (bulletin boards, subscriber
communities, e-mail, etc.) or via more traditional media (in-person
pitch, agent representation, paper submission, telephonic disclosure,
etc.). Generally, existing innovation transfer protocols require an idea
originator to bear the transaction costs of identifying and accessing
potential users. Originators often develop a potentially valuable
invention or idea that could be the seed of a Valuable business
opportunity, product, advertising slogan, motion picture, television
series, service, etc. The originator would like to be compensated for any
use of the idea. Although the originator may have inchoate intellectual
property rights (e.g., patent, copyright, trade secret or other statutory
property rights), the originator may wish to interest others in the idea
to help exploit the opportunity. The originator may attempt to contact
one or more companies or individuals that the originator believes may be
interested in the originator's idea, often choosing a recognized leader
in the field of the idea.

[0089]In addition to overcoming the initial barrier of identifying and
accessing potential users, originators are faced with the problem of
trying to disclose the idea to potential users without losing their trade
secret and other rights or having the idea misappropriated by a user to
whom the originator has disclosed the idea. Once an originator identifies
a potential user of the idea, the originator must contact the potential
user to determine if the user accepts unsolicited ideas. Many users
refuse to accept unsolicited ideas for fear of later claims of
misappropriation. Those that do accept unsolicited idea submissions
generally impose a nonconfidential disclosure requirement that
significantly decreases the originator's ability to enforce any payment
obligation on the user.

[0090]Currently, originators cannot effectively disclose or submit ideas
to users either because they lack adequate resources to identify
potential users or sophistication and experience to "pitch" the idea to
potential users, or they lack effective access to the user or to a
submission process. In addition, many companies refuse to accept
unsolicited ideas or honor confidential disclosures. The only current
alternatives are to (i) submit the idea nonconfidentially to a potential
user and hope for some compensation or (ii) do nothing and let the idea
remain undisclosed and the innovation unrealized. Even seasoned
originators (e.g., established writers and inventors) face significant
transaction costs inherent in searching for and communicating with
potential users, often settling for submission to fewer users than
desired.

[0091]Thus, as one skilled in the art will recognize, there is and has
been a long-felt need for a centralized originator- and user-driven
system for bilateral electronic commerce in ideas and electronic idea
submission capable of being utilized by novice and expert originators
alike to communicate confidentially their ideas globally to potential
users which addresses the deficiencies in the prior art. The present
invention addresses the deficiencies in the prior art and enables a
robust marketplace for confidential information and innovation.

[0092]The term "FDI" is used herein to mean, without limitation, an
originator's fully disclosed idea.

[0093]The term "idea" or "ideas" is used herein to mean, without
limitation, a potentially valuable invention, concept, idea, innovation,
epiphany, thought, slogan, development, accident, creation, solution,
discovery, suggestion, or any other act of cognition or imagination,
whether generally known or novel and nonobvious, whose application has a
positive net present value to, or is capable of use by or is potentially
useful to some identifiable user.

[0094]The term "NDS(FDI)" is used herein to mean, without limitation, a
nondisclosing synopsis of an originator's fully disclosed idea.

[0095]The term "NDS(RFP)" is used herein to mean, without limitation, a
nondisclosing synopsis of a user's fully disclosed RFP.

[0096]The term "originator" is used herein to mean, without limitation, an
individual or entity that originates an idea or a solution to an unmet
need or unsolved problem.

[0097]The term "preemptive right" is used herein to mean, without
limitation, a right of first refusal, right of first opportunity or any
other legally enforceable preemptive right.

[0098]The term "RFP" is used herein to mean, without limitation, a request
for proposal comprising a fully disclosed unmet need or unsolved problem.

[0099]The term "user" is used herein to mean, without limitation, an
individual or entity capable of implementing an idea or in search of an
idea, including an individual or entity with an unmet need or unsolved
problem.

[0100]The method and apparatus of an originator-driven embodiment of the
present invention will now be discussed with reference to FIGS. 1a, 2, 3,
and 4. In one embodiment, the present invention includes a central
controller 200, user interface 300, originator interface 400, and
associated databases. The present invention receives FDIs 130a from
originators, facilitates the creation by the originator of a
nondisclosing synopsis of the FDI 130a, or an NDS(FDI) 100a, makes the
NDS(FDI) 100a available for viewing by potential users, and allows users
conveniently to search for relevant ideas and for users potentially to
bind an originator to a license granting the user the right to access and
consider the originator's fully disclosed idea. The use of a license
ensures that the originator's FDI 130a is disclosed confidentially to
potential users thereby protecting the originator from misappropriation.
The license agreement may consist of a license agreement generated by the
system, or the submitting originator may submit the originator's FDI
subject to a license or nondisclosure agreement developed by the
submitting originator. The user may then pass on the idea or initiate an
offer to obtain a license, option, preemptive right, or assignment of the
FDI 130a. The system utilizes current chat and voice telephony technology
and payment protocols to facilitate the negotiation of the terms of an
FDI transfer agreement and the transfer of the FDI 130a, or the grant of
the right to use the FDI 130a, to the user.

[0101]The method and apparatus of a user-driven embodiment of the present
invention will now be discussed with reference to FIGS. 1b, 2, 3, and 4.
In one embodiment, the present invention includes a central controller
200, user interface 300, originator interface 400, and associated
databases. The present invention receives RFPs 130b from users,
facilitates the creation by the originator of a nondisclosing synopsis of
the RFP 130b, or an NDS(RFP) 100b, makes the NDS(RFP) 100b available for
viewing by potential originators, and allows originators conveniently to
search for relevant RFPs 130b and for originators potentially to bind a
user to a license granting the originator the exclusive right to access
and consider the user's fully disclosed RFP 130b. The use of a license
ensures that the user's RFP 130b is confidentially disclosed to potential
originators thereby protecting the user from unwanted publication or
disclosure. The license agreement may consist of a standardized,
industry-specific license agreement generated by the system, or the
submitting user may submit the user's RFP subject to a license or
nondisclosure agreement developed by the soliciting user. The originator
may then pass on the RFP 130a or submit a proposed solution to the
soliciting user's RFP 130b, which proposed solution itself comprises an
FDI 130a and may be submitted to the soliciting user in the same manner
as described for the originator-driven embodiment.

[0102]System Architecture

[0103]The system architecture of the first embodiment of the method and
apparatus of the present invention is illustrated with reference to FIGS.
1a through 4. As shown in FIG. 1a, the apparatus consists of three
"nodes" comprising the user interface 300, originator interface 400, and
central controller 200. Each node is connected via an Internet connection
using any one of many available means of network communication. User
interface 300 and originator interface 400 are input and output means for
communications with central controller 200.

[0104]Using the above components, the present invention provides (i) a
method and apparatus to post nondisclosing synopses of ideas (i.e.,
NDS(FDI)s 100a), make them available to potential users, and allow users
to bind the originators to a limited duration license allowing user
access to the fully disclosed idea (i.e., FDI 130a); and (ii) a method
and apparatus to post nondisclosing synopses of requests for proposals
(i.e., NDS(RFP)s 100b), make them available to potential originators, and
allow originators to bind the user to a license allowing originator
access to the fully disclosed RFP 130b.

[0106]A personal computer or computer workstation with sufficient memory
and processing capability may be used as central controller 200. In one
embodiment it operates a web server, (i) receiving FDIs 130a and
transmitting NDS(FDI)s 100a generated by originators; and (ii) receiving
fully disclosed RFPs 130b and transmitting NDS(RFP)s 100b generated by
users. Central controller 200 is capable of high volume transaction
processing, performing a significant number of mathematical calculations
in processing communications and database searches. A microprocessor such
as the Pentium II, commonly manufactured by Intel, Inc., may be used for
CPU 205. Equivalent processors are commonly available.

[0107]A microcontroller, commonly manufactured by Motorola, may be used
for cryptographic processor 210. Equivalent processors may also be used.
This microcontroller performs 128-bit SSL encryption and RSA private key
operation. Cryptographic processor 210 may also be configured as part of
CPU 205. Other specialized cryptographic processors are commonly known
and commercially available.

[0108]Referring to FIG. 2, payment processor 230 comprises one or more
conventional microprocessors, supporting the transfer and exchange of
payments, charges, or debits, attendant to the method of the apparatus.
Payment processor 230 may also be configured as part of CPU 205 or other
device external to the system described herein. Processing of credit
card, digital cash or other payment means transactions by payment
processor 230 may be supported with commonly known and commercially
available software. The server software transmits credit card or other
account information electronically over the Internet to servers external
to the system described herein where account verification and processing
is handled.

[0110]Originator database 257 maintains data on originators with input
fields such as name, contact information, type of originator, address,
deposit, cash or credit account number, telephone number, identification
number, taxpayer identification number, electronic mail address, credit
history, past system usage and history, status and qualifications,
public/private key information, etc. This information is obtained when an
originator first submits an idea and registers with the system, and
thereafter as the originator generates a unique transactional history by
using the system for subsequent postings. Originator database 257 also
contains the tracking number of each FDI 130a and NDS(FDI) 100a submitted
by the originator, and the tracking number of each user response and each
FDI transfer agreement proposed by the user.

[0112]FDI database 261 tracks and stores all FDIs 130a with fields such as
tracking number, originator identification number, date, time, subject,
industry category, intended user category, expiration date, conditions,
etc. This database is valuable in the event of disputes between
originators and users regarding access to FDIs 130a and independent
creation of FDIs 130a, because details of the license and access history
can be produced.

[0113]NDS(FDI) database 260 tracks and stores all NDS(FDI)s 100a with
fields identical to FDI database 261. The structure of this database is
identical to FDI database 261.

[0122]Payment database 265 tracks all payments made by users with input
fields such as user name, user identification number, amount of payment,
and associated FDI and NDS(FDI) tracking numbers. This database may also
store deposit, cash or credit account information of users.

[0124]Audit database 267 tracks and stores transactional information
related to posting of NDS(FDI)s 100a and NDS(RFP)s 100b accessing of FDIs
130a and RFPs 130b allowing it to be retrieved for subsequent analysis.

[0125]User account 268 tracks and stores all information pertaining to the
user's account with input fields such as user's name, deposit, cash or
credit account numbers, and debit or credit transactions.

[0126]Originator account 255 tracks and stores all information pertaining
to the originator's account with input fields such as user's name,
deposit, cash or credit account numbers, and debit or credit
transactions. User payments for FDIs 100a may be sent to this account.

[0127]Escrow account 269 is an account that temporarily holds user funds
before they are placed in originator account 255.

[0128]Network interface 245 is the gateway to communicate with originators
and users through respective originator interface 400 and user interface
300. Conventional internal or external modems may serve as network
interface 245. In one embodiment, network interface 245 is connected with
the Internet and/or any of the commercial on-line service providers
allowing originators and users access from a wide range of on-line
connections. Several commercially available electronic mail servers
include the above functionality and are designed to link people and
information over enterprise networks and the Internet. The system is
platform independent and utilizes open standards based on Internet
protocols. Users and originators can exchange messages with enclosures
such as files, graphics, video and audio. The system supports multiple
languages. Alternatively, the network interface 245 may be configured as
a voice mail interface, voice telephony interface, web site, bulletin
board service or electronic mail address.

[0129]Those skilled in the art will realize that the functionality of the
present invention can be distributed over a plurality of computers
utilizing an unlimited number of controllers and interface devices to
yield a more dynamic, robust and flexible system.

[0130]FIGS. 3 and 4 describe user interface 300 and originator interface
400, respectively. Both interfaces may comprise conventional personal
computers having an input device, such as keyboard, mouse or conventional
voice recognition capabilities; a display device, such as a video
monitor; a processing device such as a CPU; and a network interface such
as a modem. These devices interface with central controller 200.
Alternatively, user interface 300 and originator interface 400 may also
be a personal digital assistant such as those manufactured by Palm and
Handspring, voice mail systems, or other electronic or voice
communications systems.

[0133]Commercial software applications such as e-mail applications
manufactured by Qualcomm and Microsoft may be used to enable
communications required by user interface 300 and originator interface
400. Additionally, web browser software manufactured by Netscape and
Microsoft may be used when central controller 200 is configured as a web
server. No proprietary software is required.

[0134]On-Line Embodiment

[0135]In one originator-driven embodiment of the present invention,
communication between originators and users occurs via the Internet or
other electronic network, with central controller 200 acting as a web
server. The originator logs on to the central controller 200, submits an
FDI 130a and creates an NDS(FDI) 100a, agrees to terms of the relevant
on-line submission agreement, and then disconnects from the network.
NDS(FDI) 100a is made available to potential users by posting NDS(FDI)
100a on the web page of central controller 200. Periodic maintenance is
performed by central controller 200 to ensure that active NDS(FDI)s 100a
have not been licensed or expired. If a user decides to access the
corresponding FDI, user response 110a is transmitted 30 electronically to
central controller 200, which contacts originator that the FDI 130a has
been licensed. With reference to FIG. 5a, there is described the process
by which an originator submits FDI 130a and creates corresponding
NDS(FDI) 100a. At step 500a the originator logs on to central controller
200 using originator modem 450 of originator interface 400, establishing
a communication link. In one embodiment, central controller 200 has a
page on the World Wide Web, allowing originator to provide information or
attach electronic files (containing text, audio, video or other media)
through the interface of conventional web browser software such as
Netscape Navigator, manufactured by Netscape, Inc., or Microsoft
Explorer, manufactured by Microsoft Corporation. At step 510a, originator
selects the relevant category of the FDI 130a by selecting from a list of
possible categories. As shown in box 515a, categories might include
motion picture, book manuscript, musical composition, electronic game,
etc. At step 520a, originator selects one or more, if any, intended users
of the FDI 130a by selecting from a list of possible users or by manually
inputting an intended user not identified on the list. As shown in box
525a, intended users will be grouped according to industry sector and
might include motion picture studios, publishers, recording companies,
electronic game producers, etc. After the category and/or intended user
is selected, an electronic submission means is displayed on video monitor
430 of originator interface 400. This electronic submission means allows
originator manually to input text comprising the FDI 130a or to attach an
electronic file comprising the FDI 130a, for the purpose of submitting
the FDI 130a to central controller 200.

[0136]At step 530a, originator enters the FDI 130a in the manner described
above. A screenwriter, for example, might enter text or a text file
comprising an original screenplay, which constitutes the originator's FDI
130a; or a musician might enter an audio file comprising an audible
recording of an original musical composition, which constitutes
originator's FDI 130a. At step 540a, originator creates and enters, in
the same manner as for the FDI 130a, the corresponding NDS(FDI) 100a. As
shown in box 545a, the NDS(FDI) 100a constitutes a brief, nondisclosing
summary of the FDI 130a.

[0137]At step 550a, originator adds unique terms, if any, with respect to
the accessing, licensing, purchasing, etc., of the FDI 130a. As shown in
box 555a, the originator may specify that an FDI 130a is available for
assignment only, for a nonexclusive license only, etc. Originator's
unique terms may also include an expiration date or may restrict access
to the FDI 130a to one potential user at a time, if desired. At step
560a, originator adds a reserve or minimum price, if desired. At step
570a, originator adds a name or unique ID number to the corresponding FDI
130a. The ID number is received from the central controller 200 when the
originator registers for the service, or is chosen by the originator and
then registered with the central controller 200. Box 575a shows that the
originator must agree to the terms of an on-line submission agreement, if
any, in order to post his/her/its FDI 130a and/or NDS(FDI) 100a. Central
controller 200 maintains a database of originator ID numbers in
originator database 257, and issues or allows only unique numbers.

[0138]Once the above elements have been created, the originator transmits
them to central controller 200 at step 580a by clicking on the "send"
button located on the screen in which the data is entered.

[0140]FIG. 5b illustrates the user-driven process by which a user submits
RFP 130b and creates a corresponding NDS(RFP) 100b. The process is the
same as that described above for the originator-driven system illustrated
in FIG. 5a.

[0141]Referring now to FIG. 6a, NDS(FDI) 100a is received by central
controller 200 at step 600a and, at step 610a, central controller 200
communicates terms of the submission agreement to originator. At step
620a, originator communicates acceptance of the terms of the submission
agreement and NDS(FDI) 100a is accepted by central controller 200 at step
640a and made available to potential users at step 650a. If originator
does not communicate acceptance of the terms of the submission agreement,
central controller 200 denies acceptance of NDS(FDI) 100a at step 630a
and communicates such denial to originator. In an alternative embodiment,
originator is required to pay a submission fee after agreeing to terms of
the submission agreement. The payment can be made on-line by credit card
using standard SSL encryption and commercially available payment
transaction methods, such as provided by CyberSource and CommerceOne.

[0142]FIG. 6b illustrates the corresponding user-driven process for
submitting RFPs 130b. The process proceeds in the same manner described
above for the originator-driven embodiment.

[0143]Referring to FIG. 7a, there is illustrated an embodiment in which
NDS(FDI) 100a and FDI 130a are activated and made available to potential
users. At step 705a, a unique tracking number is added to NDS(FDI) 100a.
At step 740a, a unique tracking number is assigned to FDI 130a. Central
controller 200 timestamps NDS(FDI) 100a at step 710a and FDI 130a at step
745a, and then stores NDS(FDI) 100a in NDS(FDI) database 260 and FDI 130a
in FDI database 261. The NDS(FDI) database 260 and FDI database 261
contain a record for each NDS(FDI) 100a and FDI 130a, respectively, which
include fields such as category of FDI, status, originator's contact
information, reserve price, expiration date, date received, unique terms,
originator ID number, etc. The status field has values of "active,"
"expired" or "licensed." A status of active means the FDI 130a is
available to potential users and may be licensed. A status of expired
means that FDI 130a can no longer be accessed or licensed by potential
users. A status of "licensed" means the FDI 130a is currently being
accessed by a potential user and the corresponding originator has elected
to restrict access to one user at a time.

[0145]After being stored at step 715a and 750a, NDS(FDI) 100a and FDI
130a, respectively, may go through a series of processing steps.
Alternatively, these processing steps may be performed by central
controller 200 at steps 735a and 760a, respectively. If necessary,
central controller 200 may perform a language translation step using
commercially available translation software. Central controller 200 may
also perform a spelling check and grammar check using commercially
available software. The NDS(FDI) 100a and FDI 130a may also be processed
for clarity or completeness and the system may communicate suggestions to
the submitting originator on how to improve the clarity and completeness
of the corresponding NDS(FDI) 100a or FDI 130a. For instance, if the FDI
130a is a movie script in the horror genre, the central controller 200,
after performing the processing steps outlined above, may communicate to
the submitting originator that the screenplay is missing key information
or that "horror" films are not particularly marketable at the present
time.

[0146]In one embodiment, central controller 200 extracts the category of
the FDI 130a, which category may include industry sector (toys, video
games, software, network communications, etc.) or segment of FDI (e.g.,
script, business plan, musical composition, etc.), and posts the FDI 130a
in the appropriate category area on a website. This would allow central
controller 200 to display NDS(FDI) 100a of the corresponding FDI 130a
only to the most relevant and appropriate users. In a World Wide Web
environment, central controller 200 has a web page for each possible
category and/or combination of categories. Thus, each user looking for
screenplays (e.g., Hollywood agents or studio executives) would be able
to view on the screenplay web page all NDS(FDI)s 100a corresponding to
screenplay submissions. Or a potential user looking for particular
business plans (e.g., venture capitalist) would be able to view all
NDS(FDI)s 100a corresponding to business plans or could view a narrower
subset by viewing all NDS(FDI)s 100a corresponding to business plans for
companies involved in wireless applications software. Alternatively, a
potential user may communicate specific criteria to central controller
200, and central controller 200 will electronically mail all NDS(FDI)s
100a meeting the user's predetermined criteria or will electronically
mail a URL link to a web page containing all NDS(FDI)s 100a meeting a
user's predetermined criteria. For example, a particular venture
capitalist may wish to be notified of all NDS(FDI)s 100a constituting
business plans for software companies.

[0147]In an embodiment in which NDS(FDI)s 100a are being transmitted to
the user, user interface may comprise a computer with a modem, a cellular
telephone, a fax machine, a PDA with wireless modem, or beepers and
pagers. For example, a venture capitalist could instruct central
controller 200 to beep him or her whenever NDS(FDI) 100a comprising a
business plan for a company developing wireless applications is received
by central controller 200. Details of the particular business opportunity
could be transmitted to user's beeper LCD screen or to user's PDA, or
user may be instructed to log on to central controller 200 to receive
further details.

[0148]FIG. 7b illustrates the corresponding user-driven embodiment whereby
NDS(RFP) 100b and RFP 130b are activated and made available to potential
originators. The process is the same as that described above for the
originator-driven system.

[0149]Referring to FIG. 8a, there is illustrated a procedure for the
maintenance of NDS(FDI)s 100a. At step 800a, central controller 200
searches NDS(FDI) database 260. At step 810a, the status field of each
NDS(FDI) 100a and corresponding FDI 130a is reviewed and analyzed. If the
corresponding FDI 130a has expired, status of corresponding NDS(FDI) 100a
is changed to "expired" at step 820a. If the corresponding FDI 130a is
currently licensed, status of corresponding NDS(FDI) 100a is changed to
"licensed" at step 820a. The process is complete at step 830a when all
"active" NDS(FDI)s 100a database records have been examined.

[0150]FIG. 8b illustrates the corresponding user-driven embodiment for
maintenance of NDS(RFP)s 100b. The process is the same as that described
above for the originator-driven system.

[0151]FIG. 9a illustrates the process by which a potential user selects a
particular NDS(FDI) 100a corresponding to an FDI 130a to which the user
desires access. At step 900a, user logs on to central controller 200
using modem 350 of user interface 300. At step 910a, the potential user
selects an appropriate category. For example, a venture capitalist
looking for business plans relating to wireless application development
companies may search the wireless application business plan category in
hopes of finding an NDS(FDI) 100a meeting the venture capitalist's
development or investment criteria. Alternatively, a commercially
available search engine may be used to retrieve from NDS(FDI) database
260, all NDS(FDI)s 100a meeting the venture capitalist's development or
investment criteria. At step 920a, the potential user browses the list of
available (i.e., "active") NDS(FDI)s 100a in a particular category or
combination of categories. Once the potential user identifies a
particular NDS(FDI) 100a which the user feels is relevant, user selects
that particular NDS(FDI) 100a at step 930a The potential user is then
asked by central controller 200 to agree to the terms of a license
agreement at step 935a. The license agreement may be industry specific
and/or standardized, in which case the generic terms are stored in the
license detail database 264. Originator may make appropriate
modifications to the standard terms. In an alternative embodiment, the
potential user is allowed to access the corresponding FDI 130a without
having to agree to the terms of a license agreement. If the user agrees
to the license agreement, the corresponding FDI 130a is transmitted to
user at step 940a. In another embodiment, the NDS(FDI) 100a may be
transmitted directly to the user via electronic mail, facsimile,
telephone, pager, etc.

[0152]FIG. 9b illustrates the user-driven embodiment and the process by
which an originator searches for and selects a particular NDS(RFP) 100b
corresponding to an RFP 100b to which originator desires access in order
to conduct further review. The process is the same as that described
above for the originator-driven system.

[0153]FIGS. 10a and 11a illustrate the process by which NDS(FDI) 100a and
the corresponding FDI 130a is licensed by a user. At step 1000a, the
potential user selects a particular NDS(FDI) 100a for which user would
like to access the corresponding FDI 130a. In the on-line embodiment,
user's intention to access the corresponding FDI 130a is communicated to
central controller 200 by simply clicking on the desired NDS(FDI) 100a.
This action constitutes user's response 110a and the user's identity is
authenticated at step 1030a If necessary, timestamp allows central
controller 200 to determine the first user desiring to license the
corresponding FDI 130a. This is important if the originator of the FDI
130a has indicated that only one user may have access to the FDI 130a at
a time.

[0154]Authentication of user's identity involves central controller 200
extracting the user ID from user response 110a and looking up user's
identity in user database 259. Information in the user database 259 may
provide verification that user meets conditions imposed by the originator
and the necessary contact information to bind user to the license
agreement.

[0155]Central controller 200 verifies the status of the NDS(FDI) 100a and
corresponding FDI 130a at step 1030a to ensure the NDS(FDI) 100a is
"active" and available for licensing. If status of NDS(FDI) 100a is
"expired" or "licensed," user response 110a is refused and central
controller 200 communicates to user the particular NDS(FDI) 100a and
corresponding FDI 130a is not available for access or licensing at step
1050a. If status of NDS(FDI) 100a is "active," user is asked by central
controller 200 to agree to the terms of the license agreement at step
1060a. If user does not agree to the license agreement, central
controller 200 communicates to user at step 1050a that access to the
corresponding FDI 130a is denied. If user agrees to the license agreement
at step 1060a, central controller 200 adds a unique tracking number to
user's response 110a at step 1070a. Central controller 200 then stores
user response 110a in user response database 262 at step 1080a.

[0156]In another embodiment, the user transmits user response 110a
directly to originator at step 1010a. The originator may then send user
response 110a to central controller 200 for verification and
authentication, or originator may choose to accept user response 100a
without verification and authentication.

[0157]FIG. 11a illustrates the process for confirming that the license
agreement has been agreed to by the user. If authorized by originator,
information about the identity and qualifications of the originator is
transmitted to user at step 1100a. At step 1110a, central controller 200
changes status of the NDS(FDI) 100a to "licensed" and user ID, the unique
tracking number for the NDS(FDI) 100a and corresponding FDI 130a are
added to the license agreement. The complete and binding license
agreement is then stored in the license confirmation database 263, and
the license confirmation is transmitted to user at step 1120a and to
originator at step 1130a. If the originator has so designated, access to
the corresponding FDI 130a by subsequent users will be denied.

[0158]In another embodiment, the originator may allow multiple users to
access an FDI 130a pursuant to a license agreement. In this case,
NDS(FDI) 100a may maintain its status of "active" indefinitely or until a
certain number of users have responded. For example, an originator may
designate that the FDI 130a (e.g., franchise business opportunity) is
available for licensing by up to 5 users in a particular geographic
region. Once 5 users have licensed the FDI 130a, the status of the
corresponding NDS(FDI) 100a is changed to "licensed" or "expired."
Another option is to open the FDI 130a to any number of users.

[0159]FIGS. 10b and 11b describe the process by which NDS(RFP) 110b and
the corresponding RFP 130b are licensed by an originator in the
user-driven embodiment of the present invention. The process is the same
as that described above for the originator-driven system.

[0160]FIG. 12a illustrates the process by which a user communicates user's
desire to obtain the right to use the FDI 130a. At step 1200a, central
controller 200 grants user access to the FDI 130a for user's review and
consideration. User examines FDI 130a at step 1210a to determine the
value of the FDI 130a and assess whether or not user desires to obtain
rights to use the FDI 130a If user is not interested in obtaining the
right to use the FDI 130a, user communicates user's decision to central
controller 200 at step 1220a The license agreement, pursuant to which
user was granted access to the FDI 130a, expires by its own terms and
central controller 200 changes status of NDS(FDI) 100a from "licensed" to
"active" at step 1230a. FDI 130a is now available for access and
licensing by another potential user. Alternatively, if access to the FDI
130a has not been restricted to one user at a time, user's decision not
to obtain the right to use the FDI 130a is communicated to central
controller 200 and stored in user response database 262 or communicated
directly to originator at step 1230a. If user desires to obtain the right
to use the FDI 130a, user's decision is communicated to central
controller 200 at step 1220a, and user is asked to communicate proposed
terms of FDI transfer agreement to central controller 200 at step 1240a.
The FDI transfer agreement may be industry-specific or may contain
standardized terms, in which case the generic terms of the FDI transfer
agreement are stored in the FDI transfer agreement database 251. User may
make appropriate modifications to the standard terms. This process is
described under the heading FDI Transfer Agreement Embodiment below with
reference to FIGS. 18a and 19a. Alternatively, user may communicate terms
of FDI transfer agreement directly to originator at step 1240a.

[0161]FIG. 12b illustrates the process by which an originator communicates
originator's desire to propose a solution to user's RFP 130b. The process
is the same as that described above for the originator-driven system.

[0162]FIG. 18b describes the process by which an originator creates an FDI
130a comprising a proposed solution to soliciting user's RFP 130b. At
step 1800b, originator creates the FDI 130a, which, as indicated in box
1805b, may be an estimate, scope of work, proposal or solution. At step
1810b, originator logs onto central controller 200 to submit the FDI
130a, which comprises the proposed solution to the soliciting user's RFP
130b. Box 1805b indicates that this process is identical with steps 510a
through 580a described in FIG. 5a.

[0163]FDI Transfer Agreement Embodiment

[0164]In one embodiment of the present invention, users respond to FDI
130a, whether submitted independently or as a proposed solution to user's
RFP 130b, by proposing the terms of an offer to option, license, purchase
or otherwise transfer the right to use the FDI 130a, by submitting an FDI
transfer agreement. The FDI transfer agreement is submitted in a similar
manner as the NDS(FDI) 100a, except that FDI transfer agreement is
directed to a specified originator, whereas NDS(FDI) 100a may have been
directed to a plurality of users.

[0165]FIG. 18a depicts the development and submission of an FDI transfer
agreement. At step 1800a, the potential user proposes terms for the FDI
transfer agreement. As shown in box 1805a, potential user may attempt to
acquire from originator a license, preemptive right, assignment or other
right to use the originator's FDI 130a. At step 1810a, user prepares FDI
transfer agreement with modified terms. At step 1820a, user attaches the
tracking number of the corresponding FDI 130a to FDI transfer agreement.
Central controller 200 receives FDI transfer agreement at step 1830a,
setting the status to "active." Central controller 200 then adds a unique
tracking number to FDI transfer agreement at step 1840a, and stores it in
the FDI transfer agreement database 251 at step 1850a. Central controller
200 extracts the tracking number of the corresponding FDI 130a attached
to FDI transfer agreement in order to find the originator to whom FDI
transfer agreement is transmitted at step 1860a.

[0166]FIG. 19 shows the process by which the originator responds to FDI
transfer agreement. At step 1900 originator decides whether to accept the
proposed terms of the FDI transfer agreement. If originator does not
accept FDI transfer agreement, it is transmitted back to user at step
1910. At this point, originator may proceed with submitting originator's
own FDI transfer agreement in the same manner as described above for
user. If originator accepts FDI transfer agreement, originator response
110b is transmitted to central controller 200 at step 1920. At step 1930,
funds are removed, pursuant to the FDI transfer agreement, from user
account 268 and placed in originator account 255. Alternatively, funds
are removed from user account 268 and placed in escrow account 269 until
originator completes transfer of FDI 130a to user, at which point funds
are placed in originator account 255.

[0167]Payment Methods

[0168]FIG. 13 illustrates a protocol in which central controller 200
establishes user account 268. At step 1300, user selects a preferred
method of payment. Preferred methods might include credit card, personal
check, electronic funds transfer, digital cash, etc. User transmits
payment data to central controller 200 at step 1310a. As indicated in box
1315, such payment data might include credit card account number, bank
account number or digital cash account number. These payment methods are
meant to be merely illustrative, however, as there are many equivalent
payment methods commonly known in the art that may also be used. At step
1320, payment data and payment preferences are stored by central
controller 200 in payment database 265. At step 1330, central controller
200 establishes user account 268 which may store money transferred by the
user or may serve as pointer to an account of the user outside the
system. For users using credit cards, for example, user account 268
contains the credit card number, expiration date, and name of issuing
institution. At step 1340, central controller 200 contacts the bank or
card issuer to confirm that funds are available.

[0169]The above protocols may be similarly applied to originators allowing
for creation of originator account 255. The originator account 255 is
primarily used for deposits, with money flowing from users to originator.
However, in one embodiment originators are required to pay a submission
fee in order to post an NDS(FDI) 100a and corresponding FDI 130a, in
which case central controller 200 must establish originator account 255
and receive payment data in the same manner described above for users.

[0170]There are many commercially available payment systems that will be
known to those skilled in the art. Payment data and transaction
confirmation may be processed on-line via the World Wide Web or
conventionally via telephone, facsimile, postal mail, electronic mail,
etc. Thus, payment data and transaction processing may occur outside of
the system if necessary.

[0171]Escrow Embodiment

[0172]In an alternative embodiment, payment to originator by user may be
delayed until the rights to the FDI 130a have been adequately transferred
to user. Escrow account 269 allows payment to be delayed until originator
agrees to the terms of the FDI transfer agreement, which at the same time
ensures that user will in fact make payment. Central controller 200
establishes escrow account 269 as a temporary holding account. When
originator binds user to FDI transfer agreement at step 1900 and central
controller 200 receives originator response at step 1920, funds are
removed from user account 268 and placed in escrow account 269 at step
1930. When rights to use FDI 130a, or physical embodiment of the FDI 130a
is transmitted to user and confirmation of transfer is received by
central controller 200, funds are transferred from escrow account 269 to
originator account 255.

[0173]In another embodiment, the FDI transfer agreement may provide for
the payment of royalty or installment payment. Central controller 200 may
act as a funds clearinghouse for such transactions, so that accurate
record of royalty or installment payments are maintained in user account
268 and originator account 255.

[0174]Off-Line Embodiments

[0175]In one embodiment of the present invention, originators and users
communicate with central controller 200 in a manner other than electronic
mail or web-based server. Conventional communications means, such as
telephone, facsimile, postal mail, courier or other means can also be
used.

[0176]For instance, facsimile, postal mail or courier could be used to
deliver a print version of available NDS(FDI)s 100a to potential users.
Potential users desiring access to a particular FDI 130a could then
deliver user response 110a to central controller 200 via postal mail or
courier or deliver user response directly to the originator. Terms of the
license could then be delivered to user and license confirmation 120a
could then be delivered to originator. Originator or central controller
200 would then deliver FDI 130a to user pursuant to terms of the license
agreement. Alternatively, any combination of the mentioned methods of
communication could be used, including digitization of written material
and subsequent posting of such content on the World Wide Web in the
manner described for the on-line embodiment.

[0177]Cryptographic Authentication Embodiment

[0178]In the previous embodiments, authentication of originator and user
involves checking the attached ID number or name and comparing it with
those stored in originator database 257 and user database 259. As one
skilled in the art will recognize, commercially available cryptographic
protocols may be used to enhance security and ensure authentication of
originator and user. These protocols can be used in connection with the
on-line embodiment to ensure communications between user or originator
and central controller 200 have not been interrupted and to verify their
integrity. This is particularly important when dealing with FDIs 130a or
RFPs 130b that constitute confidential information. The practice of using
cryptographic assurance methods to ensure authenticity of senders as well
as the integrity of messages is well known in the art and need not be
described here in detail.

[0179]FIG. 14a describes a symmetric key embodiment in which the user and
central controller 200 share a key. Both encryption and decryption of
user response 110a are performed with the same key. User encrypts user
response 100a with user's assigned symmetric key at step 1400a, using
cryptographic processor 310 of user interface 300. The key may be stored
in message database 370 or otherwise stored or memorized by user. The
encrypted user response 110a is then transmitted to cryptographic
processor 210 of central controller 200 at step 1410a. Cryptographic
processor 210 extracts user ID from user response 110a at step 1420a and
looks up symmetric key of user in cryptographic key database 266 at step
1430a, decrypting user response 110a with this key at step 1450a.
Cryptographic key database 266 contains algorithms and keys for
encrypting and decrypting and/or authenticating messages. At step 1460a,
if the resulting message is intelligible, then it must have been
encrypted using the same key, authenticating that the user must have been
the author of the user response 110a.

[0180]FIG. 14b describes the corresponding symmetric key embodiment as
used in the user-driven embodiment of the invention. The process is the
same as that described above for the originator-driven system.

[0181]FIG. 15a describes an asymmetric key embodiment in which user
response 110a is encrypted with a private key and decrypted with a public
key. At step 1500a, user encrypts user response 110a with user's private
key using cryptographic processor 310, transmitting user response 110a to
central controller 200 at step 15110a. Cryptographic processor 210
extracts the user ID at step 1520a and looks up the user's associated
public key in cryptographic key database 266 at step 1530a, decrypting
user response 110a with this public key at step 1540a. As before, if user
response 100a is intelligible then central controller 200 has
authenticated the user at step 1550a.

[0182]FIG. 15b describes the corresponding asymmetric key embodiment as
used in the user-driven embodiment of the invention. The process is the
same as that described above for the originator-driven system.

[0183]FIG. 16a shows a cryptographic technique using digital signatures to
provide authentication and message integrity. As in the asymmetric
protocol described above, each user has an associated public and private
key. The user sings user response 110a with user's private key at step
1600a using cryptographic processor 310 and transmits user response 110a
to central controller 200 at step 1610a. Central controller 200
cryptographic processor 210 extracts the user ID at step 1620a and looks
up user's public key at step 1630a, verifying the signature using user's
response 110a and the public key of user at step 1640a. If user response
110a is intelligible, then central controller 200 accepts user response
110a as authenticated at step 1650a.

[0184]FIG. 16b describes the corresponding digital signature embodiment as
used in the user-driven embodiment of the invention. The process is the
same as that described above for the originator-driven system.

[0185]FIG. 17a describes a cryptographic technique using message
authentication codes for verifying the authenticity and integrity of user
response 110a. User and central controller 200 share a symmetric key,
which user includes in a hash of user response 110a at step 1700a. In the
hash protocol, a one-way function is applied to the digital
representation of the user response 110a, generating a code that acts
much like a fingerprint of user's response 110a. After transmitting user
response 110a to central controller 200 at step 1710a, cryptographic
processor 210 extracts user ID from user response 110a at step 1720a.
Cryptographic processor 210 looks up user's symmetric key at step 1730a
and hashes user response 110a with this symmetric key at step 1740a,
comparing the resulting hash value with the hash value attached to user's
response 110a. If the values match at step 1750a, the integrity of user
response 110a is verified along with the authenticity of the user.

[0186]FIG. 17b describes the corresponding cryptographic technique as used
in the user-driven embodiment of the invention. The process is the same
as that described above for the originator-driven system.

[0187]Biometric Devices

[0188]Additional security can be built into the system by using biometric
devices such as fingerprint reader, voice recognition system, retinal
scanner, facial recognition system and the like. These incorporate a
physical attribute into the user response 110a, which is then compared
with the value stored in user database 259. Such biometric devices 355
may attach to user interface 300. Many such biometric devices 355 are
commercially available and the use of such biometric devices to ensure
authenticity of senders is well know in the art and need not be described
in detail herein.

[0189]For example, using a fingerprint reader, user places user's finger
on a lens and the resulting image is scanned, digitized, and the data is
stored in memory. Each live-scan fingerprint is compared to the
previously stored template, stored in data storage device 360. If the
prints do not match, cryptographic processor 310 may prevent user from
generating a user response 110a.

[0192]As described herein, the present invention provides for the
anonymity of both users and originators if desired. Anonymity is
accomplished by eliminating all references to the names of the
individuals or entities involved in all transactions. An originator, for
example, would add originator's ID to an NDS(FDI) 100a or FDI 130a rather
than adding originator's name, preventing a user browsing NDS(FDI)s 100a
from discovering originator's identity. This may be desirable if
originator is a screenwriter, for instance, with a negative credit in his
portfolio. The FDI 130a would be purchased, licensed or whatever by the
user based entirely on the merit of the FDI 130a and not the originator's
experience or qualifications. In a similar manner, users may wish to keep
their identity anonymous. A venture capitalist may not want the
originator of a business opportunity to know the identity of the venture
capitalist because such knowledge would allow the originator to assess
previous investments of the venture capitalist or discover the typical
dollar amount invested by the venture capitalist.

[0193]In the user-driven embodiment, a user may wish to submit an RFP 130b
anonymously so that originators with possible solutions can not disclose
who has a particular need, which information could signal trouble to the
investment community or signal weakness to a competitor. Similarly, an
originator may wish to remain anonymous. A screenwriter with a bad credit
may wish to propose a screenplay for development by a user that has
posted an RFP 130b. The screenwriter would prefer to have the proposed
FDI 130a be considered on the merit of the screenplay, not his or her one
bad credit.

[0194]Many methods for ensuring anonymity will be obvious to those skilled
in the art and need not be described herein. To enhance security, user
and originator IDs may be encrypted with the public key of central
controller 200 to prevent unauthorized use.

[0195]In one embodiment of the present invention, central controller 200
is separated into three distinct elements: operations server 2000,
trusted server 2010 and bonding agency 2020. Each server performs a
distinct task in the process of managing NDS(FDI) 100a, FDI 130a,
NDS(RFP) 100b, RFP 130b, and other tasks. The separation makes it more
difficult for attackers to compromise the system. As indicated in FIG.
20, these servers work in conjunction with user interface 300 and
originator interface 400. Operations server 2000 has the task of posting
NDS(FDI)s 100a or NDS(RFP)s 100b, and accepts all transactions previously
authenticated by trusted server 2010. Trusted server 2010 authenticates
the identity of users and originators, while bonding agency 2020 verifies
the ability of users to pay and the ability of originators to deliver the
FDI 130a or the rights to use the FDI 130a. There are many network
configurations and software applications commercially available to manage
the trusted server embodiment described herein. It will be obvious to one
skilled in the art that each server type may be distributed over a number
of servers.

[0196]Barter Embodiments

[0197]Not all transactions require the transfer of money from user to
originator. In a barter transaction, the user may propose in the FDI
transfer agreement to swap equity in user's entity or a new entity
instead of cash. For instance, if user is a venture capitalist, user may
propose establishing a company to exploit the business opportunity
represented by originator's FDI 130a. Alternatively, a user may propose
to employ originator or to perform services in exchange for the right to
use originators FDI 130a.

[0198]Arbitration Protocols

[0199]The previous embodiments have described the transfer of an FDI 130a,
RFP 130b or execution of an FDI transfer agreement as the end of the
process. In light of the fact that the present invention deals with ideas
and confidential information, disputes are inevitable. Disputes regarding
misappropriation of trade secrets will be reduced when utilizing the
present invention as all communications and transactions are stored in
respective databases and electronic records of all such activities could
be produced to help resolve disputes early on. The present invention can
support dispute resolution in two ways.

[0200]First, provisions can be part of the submission and license
agreements requiring that both originator and user submit to binding
arbitration of all disputes, helping avoid more costly and time-consuming
legal proceedings. A liquidated damages provision may also be included in
the submission and license agreements to bring certainty to each party's
potential exposure.

[0201]Second, central controller 200 or a third-party may be designated as
arbiter for each dispute. Such disputes can be resolved utilizing on-line
arbitration provided by companies such as clicknsettle.com. Most
misappropriation claims will be resolved on the basis of proof of
independent creation or an independent source. Such disputes are
particularly suited for on-line arbitration because proof is often in the
form of documentary evidence rather than witness testimony. The time and
date of access to an FDI 130a by an identifiable user or access to an RFP
130b by an identifiable originator is maintained by central controller
200 and is easily reproducible for use in the arbitration process. Proof
of an independent source would be particularly easy to prove if the
transaction occurred using the present invention because a record of that
transaction would likewise be easily reproducible. Proof of independent
creation, such as copyright filings or research notes, could be
communicated to central controller 200 or all transaction data could be
sent to the third party arbiter outside the system.

[0202]Revenue Generation

[0203]The providers of the systems may derive revenue from originators and
users in a number of ways. In one embodiment, a percentage-based
commission is charged on every innovation transfer transaction
consummated via the system. In another embodiment, originators pay a
per-submission fee, or are charged a flat fee for any number of FDIs
submitted over a given period. In another embodiment, users are charged
an access fee per FDI accessed, or are charged a flat fee for any number
of FDIs accessed in a given period of time. In another embodiment, users
pay the provider a license fee in exchange for the right to use the
present invention for exclusive submissions. In another embodiment,
advertisers pay to have messages displayed to originators and users
alike.

[0204]In another embodiment, content providers pay to provide relevant
information to originators and users alike. Alternatively, the method and
apparatus of the present invention may be employed without a payment
feature.

[0205]Applications of the Invention

[0206]In order to clarify the application of the present invention, the
following examples demonstrate potential needs of originators and users
and demonstrate the originator-driven component of the present invention:

[0207]FDI: Motion Picture Screenplay

[0208]An originator desires to submit an original screenplay to a
potential user (i.e., movie studio) for review and consideration. The
originator logs onto a web site (e.g., central controller 200) and inputs
identifying information and qualifications, attaches a text file
comprising the fully disclosed complete screenplay, creates a
nondisclosing synopsis of the screenplay, and clicks on the "submit" icon
available on the web site. The originator is then asked by the system to
agree to the terms of a submission agreement. Originator agrees to the
terms of the submission agreement and the fully disclosed screenplay is
stored in a secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made available
to the user via the World Wide Web (WWW). If the user is interested in
reviewing the entire screenplay, user clicks on the "access" icon. The
user is then asked by the system to agree to the terms of a license
agreement granting the user the right to review and consider the
originator's screenplay. If user agrees, user is granted access to the
entire screenplay for consideration pursuant to the terms of the on-line
license agreement. If user is interested in further analysis and/or in
purchasing the screenplay for production, user pays a negotiated sum for
the rights desired.

[0209]FDI: Business Opportunity

[0210]An originator desires to submit, confidentially (i.e., pursuant to a
confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement) or nonconfidentially (i.e.,
no confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement), a business plan,
executive summary or business concept to a potential user (i.e.,
individual or entity interested in reviewing business concepts) (e.g.,
venture capitalist, angel investor, strategic partner, etc.) for review
and consideration. The originator logs onto a web site (e.g., central
controller 200) and inputs identifying information and qualifications,
attaches a text file, inputs free-form text, and/or uploads an audio or
video file comprising the fully disclosed complete business plan, creates
a nondisclosing synopsis of the business plan, and clicks the "submit"
icon available on the web site. The originator is then asked by the
system to agree to the terms of a submission agreement. Originator agrees
to the terms of the submission agreement and the fully disclosed business
plan is stored in a secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made
available to an intended and identifiable user, or to a plurality of
potential users, via the World Wide Web. A user may scroll through
nondisclosing synopses of available business plans by category or may
utilize the system's search engine to identify and rank relevant
nondisclosing synopses of available business plans. If a user is
interested in reviewing the entire business plan, user clicks on the
"access" icon for the corresponding nondisclosing synopsis. The user is
then asked by the system to agree to the terms of a license agreement
granting the user the right to review and consider the originator's
business plan. The license may be exclusive or nonexclusive as determined
by the submitting originator. If user agrees, user is granted access to
the entire business plan for consideration pursuant to the terms of the
on-line license agreement. If user is interested in further analysis
and/or in providing funding to the submitting originator, user contacts
originator to negotiate the terms of the deal (e.g., financing, joint
venture, partnership, etc.).

[0211]FDI: Application Software

[0212]An originator desires to submit, confidentially (i.e., pursuant to a
confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement) or nonconfidentially (i.e.,
no confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement), a specification for a
new software application ("spec") to a potential user (i.e., individual
or entity looking for new software applications) (e.g., software or other
technology company, university, venture capitalist, entrepreneur, etc.)
for review and consideration. The originator logs onto a web site (e.g.,
central controller 200) and inputs identifying information and
qualifications, attaches a text file, inputs free-form text, and/or
uploads the software program comprising the fully disclosed complete
spec, creates a nondisclosing synopsis of the spec, and clicks the
"submit" icon available on the web site. The originator is then asked by
the system to agree to the terms of a submission agreement. Originator
agrees to the terms of the submission agreement and the fully disclosed
spec is stored in a secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made
available to an intended and identifiable user, or to a plurality of
potential users, via the World Wide Web. A user may scroll through
nondisclosing synopses of available specs by category or may utilize the
system's search engine to identify and rank relevant nondisclosing
synopses of available specs. If a user is interested in reviewing the
entire spec, the user clicks on the "access" icon for the corresponding
nondisclosing synopsis. The user is then asked by the system to agree to
the terms of a license agreement granting the user the right to review
and consider the originator's spec. The license may be exclusive or
nonexclusive as determined by the submitting originator. If user agrees,
user is granted access to the entire spec for consideration pursuant to
the terms of the on-line license agreement. If user is interested in
further analysis and/or in purchasing or otherwise acquiring the rights
to the spec, user contacts originator to negotiate the terms of the deal
(e.g., license, purchase, development, etc.).

[0213]FDI: Book Manuscript

[0214]An originator desires to submit, confidentially (i.e., pursuant to a
confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement) or nonconfidentially (i.e.,
no confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement), a book manuscript to a
potential user (i.e., individual or entity looking for new book
manuscripts) (e.g., publisher, university, literary agent, movie studio,
etc.) for review and consideration. The originator logs onto a web site
(e.g., central controller 200) and inputs identifying information and
qualifications, attaches a text file or inputs free-form text comprising
the fully disclosed complete book manuscript, creates a nondisclosing
synopsis of the book manuscript, and clicks the "submit" icon available
on the web site. The originator is then asked by the system to agree to
the terms of a submission agreement. Originator agrees to the terms of
the submission agreement and the fully disclosed book manuscript is
stored in a secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made available
to an intended and identifiable user, or to a plurality of potential
users, via the World Wide Web. A user may scroll through nondisclosing
synopses of available book manuscripts by category or may utilize the
system's search engine to identify and rank relevant nondisclosing
synopses of available book manuscripts. If a user is interested in
reviewing the entire book manuscript, the user clicks on the "access"
icon for the corresponding nondisclosing synopsis. The user is then asked
by the system to agree to the terms of a license agreement granting the
user the right to review and consider the originator's book manuscript.
The license may be exclusive or nonexclusive as determined by the
submitting originator. If user agrees, user is granted access to the
entire book manuscript for consideration pursuant to the terms of the
on-line license agreement. If user is interested in further analysis
and/or in purchasing or otherwise acquiring the rights to the book
manuscript, user contacts originator to negotiate the terms of the deal
(e.g., publishing agreement, option, license, purchase, development,
etc.).

[0215]FDI: Musical Composition

[0216]An originator desires to submit, confidentially (i.e., pursuant to a
confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement) or nonconfidentially (i.e.,
no confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement), a musical composition to
a potential user (i.e., individual or entity looking for new musical
compositions) (e.g., publisher, university, music agent, movie studio,
record company, etc.) for review and consideration. The originator logs
onto a web site (e.g., central controller 200) and inputs identifying
information and qualifications, attaches a text file, inputs free-form
text, and/or uploads an audio or video file comprising the fully
disclosed complete musical composition, creates a nondisclosing synopsis
of the musical composition, and clicks the "submit" icon available on the
web site. The originator is then asked by the system to agree to the
terms of a submission agreement. Originator agrees to the terms of the
submission agreement and the fully disclosed musical composition is
stored in a secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made available
to an intended and identifiable user, or to a plurality of potential
users, via the World Wide Web. A user may scroll through nondisclosing
synopses of available musical compositions by category or may utilize the
system's search engine to identify and rank relevant nondisclosing
synopses of available musical compositions. If a user is interested in
reviewing the entire musical composition, user clicks on the "access"
icon for the corresponding nondisclosing synopsis. The user is then asked
by the system to agree to the terms of a license agreement granting the
user the right to review and consider the originator's musical
composition. The license may be exclusive or nonexclusive as determined
by the submitting originator. If user agrees, user is granted access to
the entire musical composition for consideration pursuant to the terms of
the on-line license agreement. If user is interested in further analysis
and/or in purchasing or otherwise acquiring the rights to the musical
composition, user contacts originator to negotiate the terms of the deal
(e.g., publishing agreement, option, license, purchase, development,
etc.).

[0217]FDI: Toy Concept

[0218]An originator desires to submit, confidentially (i.e., pursuant to a
confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement) or nonconfidentially (i.e.,
no confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement), a toy concept to a
potential user (i.e., individual or entity looking for new toy concepts)
(e.g., toy manufacturer, agent, marketing company, movie studio, etc.)
for review and consideration. The originator logs onto a web site (e.g.,
central controller 200) and inputs identifying information and
qualifications, attaches a text file, inputs free-form text, and/or
uploads an audio, video or graphics file comprising the fully disclosed
complete toy concept, creates a nondisclosing synopsis of the toy
concept, and clicks the "submit" icon available on the web site. The
originator is then asked by the system to agree to the terms of a
submission agreement. Originator agrees to the terms of the submission
agreement and the fully disclosed toy concept is stored in a secure
database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made available to an intended and
identifiable user, or to a plurality of potential users, via the World
Wide Web. A user may scroll through nondisclosing synopses of available
toy concepts by category or may utilize the system's search engine to
identify and rank relevant nondisclosing synopses of available toy
concepts. If a user is interested in reviewing the entire toy concept,
the user clicks on the "access" icon for the corresponding nondisclosing
synopsis. The user is then asked by the system to agree to the terms of a
license agreement granting the user the right to review and consider the
originator's toy concept. The license may be exclusive or nonexclusive as
determined by the submitting originator. If user agrees, user is granted
access to the entire toy concept for consideration pursuant to the terms
of the on-line license agreement. If user is interested in further
analysis and/or in purchasing or otherwise acquiring the rights to the
toy concept, user contacts originator to negotiate the terms of the deal
(e.g., publishing agreement, option, license, purchase, development,

[0219]FDI: Advertising Slogan

[0220]An originator desires to submit, confidentially (i.e., pursuant to a
confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement) or nonconfidentially (i.e.,
no confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement), a proposed advertising
slogan to a potential user (i.e., individual or entity looking for new
advertising slogans) (e.g., advertising agencies, agent, marketing
company, movie studio, consulting company, publisher, etc.) for review
and consideration. The originator logs onto a web site (e.g., central
controller 200) and inputs identifying information and qualifications,
attaches a text file, inputs free-form text, and/or uploads an audio,
video or graphics file comprising the fully disclosed complete
advertising slogan, creates a nondisclosing synopsis of the advertising
slogan, and clicks the "submit" icon available on the web site. The
originator is then asked by the system to agree to the terms of a
submission agreement. Originator agrees to the terms of the submission
agreement and the fully disclosed advertising slogan is stored in a
secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made available to an
intended and identifiable user, or to a plurality of potential users, via
the World Wide Web. A user may scroll through nondisclosing synopses of
available advertising slogans by category or may utilize the system's
search engine to identify and rank relevant nondisclosing synopses of
available advertising slogans. If a user is interested in reviewing the
entire advertising slogan, user clicks on the "access" icon for the
corresponding nondisclosing synopsis. The user is then asked by the
system to agree to the terms of a license agreement granting the user the
right to review and consider the originator's advertising slogan. The
license may be exclusive or nonexclusive as determined by the submitting
originator. If user agrees, user is granted access to the entire
advertising slogan for consideration pursuant to the terms of the on-line
license agreement. If user is interested in further analysis and/or in
purchasing or otherwise acquiring the rights to the advertising slogan,
user contacts originator to negotiate the terms of the deal (e.g.,
publishing agreement, option, license, purchase, development, etc.).

[0221]FDI: Company Trade Name

[0222]An originator desires to submit, confidentially (i.e., pursuant to a
confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement) or nonconfidentially (i.e.,
no confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement), a proposed company trade
name and/or logo to a potential user (i.e., individual or entity looking
for new trade names and/or logos) (e.g., advertising agency, public
relations firm, agent, marketing company, movie studio, etc.) for review
and consideration. The originator logs onto a web site (e.g., central
controller 200) and inputs identifying information and qualifications,
attaches a text file, inputs free-form text, and/or uploads an audio,
video or graphics file comprising the fully disclosed complete trade name
and/or logo, creates a nondisclosing synopsis of the trade name and/or
logo, and clicks the "submit" icon available on the web site. The
originator is then asked by the system to agree to the terms of a
submission agreement. Originator agrees to the terms of the submission
agreement and the fully disclosed trade name and/or logo is stored in a
secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made available to an
intended and identifiable user, or to a plurality of potential users, via
the World Wide Web. A user may scroll through nondisclosing synopses of
available trade names and/or logos by category or may utilize the
system's search engine to identify and rank relevant nondisclosing
synopses of available trade names and/or logos. If a user is interested
in reviewing the entire trade name and/or logo, user clicks on the
"access" icon for the corresponding nondisclosing synopsis. The user is
then asked by the system to agree to the terms of a license agreement
granting the user the right to review and consider the originator's trade
name and/or logo. The license may be exclusive or nonexclusive as
determined by the submitting originator. If user agrees, user is granted
access to the entire trade name and/or logo for consideration pursuant to
the terms of the on-line license agreement. If user is interested in
further analysis and/or in purchasing or otherwise acquiring the rights
to the trade name and/or logo, user contacts originator to negotiate the
terms of the deal (e.g., publishing agreement, option, license, purchase,
development, etc.).

[0223]FDI: Service Mark

[0224]An originator desires to submit, confidentially (i.e., pursuant to a
confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement) or nonconfidentially (i.e.,
no confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement), a proposed service mark
to a potential user (i.e., individual or entity looking for new service
marks) (e.g. advertising agency, public relations firm, agent, marketing
company, movie studio, etc.) for review and consideration. The originator
logs onto a web site (e.g., central controller 200) and inputs
identifying information and qualifications, attaches a text file, inputs
free-form text, and/or uploads an audio, video or graphics file
comprising the fully disclosed complete service mark, creates a
nondisclosing synopsis of the service mark, and clicks the "submit" icon
available on the web site. The originator is then asked by the system to
agree to the terms of a submission agreement. Originator agrees to the
terms of the submission agreement and the fully disclosed service mark is
stored in a secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made available
to an intended and identifiable user, or to a plurality of potential
users, via the World Wide Web. A user may scroll through nondisclosing
synopses of available service marks by category or may utilize the
system's search engine to identify and rank relevant nondisclosing
synopses of available service marks. If a user is interested in reviewing
the entire service mark, the user clicks on the "access" icon for the
corresponding nondisclosing synopsis. The user is then asked by the
system to agree to the terms of a license agreement granting the user the
right to review and consider the originator's service mark. The license
may be exclusive or nonexclusive as determined by the submitting
originator. If user agrees, user is granted access to the entire service
mark for consideration pursuant to the terms of the on-line license
agreement. If user is interested in further analysis and/or in purchasing
or otherwise acquiring the rights to the service mark, user contacts
originator to negotiate the terms of the deal (e.g., publishing
agreement, option, license, purchase, development, etc.).

[0225]FDI: Product Trademark

[0226]An originator desires to submit, confidentially (i.e., pursuant to a
confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement) or nonconfidentially (i.e.,
no confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement), a proposed product
trademark to a potential user (i.e., individual or entity looking for new
trademarks) (e.g., advertising agency, public relations firm, agent,
marketing company, movie studio, etc.) for review and consideration. The
originator logs onto a web site (e.g., central controller 200) and inputs
identifying information and qualifications, attaches a text file, inputs
free-form text, and/or uploads an audio, video or graphics file
comprising the fully disclosed complete trademark, creates a
nondisclosing synopsis of the trademark, and clicks the "submit" icon
available on the web site. The originator is then asked by the system to
agree to the terms of a submission agreement. Originator agrees to the
terms of the submission agreement and the fully disclosed trademark is
stored in a secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made available
to an intended and identifiable user, or to a plurality of potential
users, via the World Wide Web. A user may scroll through nondisclosing
synopses of available trademarks by category or may utilize the system's
search engine to identify and rank relevant nondisclosing synopses of
available trademarks. If a user is interested in reviewing the entire
trademark, user clicks on the "access" icon for the corresponding.
nondisclosing synopsis. The user is then asked by the system to agree to
the terms of a license agreement granting the user the right to review
and consider the originator's trademark. The license may be exclusive or
nonexclusive as determined by the submitting originator. If user agrees,
user is granted access to the entire trademark for consideration pursuant
to the terms of the on-line license agreement. If user is interested in
further analysis and/or in purchasing or otherwise acquiring the rights
to the trademark, user contacts originator to negotiate the terms of the
deal (e.g., publishing agreement, option, license, purchase, development,
etc.).

[0227]FDI: Chemical Composition

[0228]An originator desires to submit, confidentially (i.e., pursuant to a
confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement) or nonconfidentially (i.e.,
no confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement), a new chemical
composition to a potential user (i.e., individual or entity looking for
new chemical compositions) (e.g., chemical manufacturer, university,
research entity, government agency, etc.) for review and consideration.
The originator logs onto a web site (e.g., central controller 200) and
inputs identifying information and qualifications, attaches a text file,
inputs free-form text, and/or uploads an audio, video or graphics file
comprising the fully disclosed complete chemical composition, creates a
nondisclosing synopsis of the chemical composition, and clicks the
"submit" icon available on the web site. The originator is then asked by
the system to agree to the terms of a submission agreement. Originator
agrees to terms of the submission agreement and the fully disclosed
chemical composition is stored in a secure database. The nondisclosing
synopsis is made available to an intended and identifiable user, or to a
plurality of potential users, via the World Wide Web. A user may scroll
through nondisclosing synopses of available chemical compositions by
category or may utilize the system's search engine to identify and rank
relevant nondisclosing synopses of available chemical compositions. If a
user is interested in reviewing the entire chemical composition, user
clicks on the "access" icon for the corresponding nondisclosing synopsis.
The user is then asked by the system to agree to the terms of a license
agreement granting the user the right to review and consider the
originator's chemical composition. The license may be exclusive or
nonexclusive as determined by the submitting originator. If user agrees,
user is granted access to the entire chemical composition for
consideration pursuant to the terms of the on-line license agreement. If
user is interested in further analysis and/or in purchasing or otherwise
acquiring the rights to the chemical composition, user contacts
originator to negotiate the terms of the deal (e.g., publishing
agreement, option, license, purchase, development, etc.).

[0229]FDI: Product Enhancement

[0230]An originator desires to submit, confidentially (i.e., pursuant to a
confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement) or nonconfidentially (i.e.,
no confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement), a specification for a
new product enhancement ("spec") to a potential user (i.e., individual or
entity looking for new product enhancements) (e.g., software or other
technology company, automobile manufacturer, university, venture
capitalist, entrepreneur, etc.) for review and consideration. The
originator logs onto a web site (e.g., central controller 200) and inputs
identifying information and qualifications, attaches a text file, inputs
free-form text, and/or uploads an audio file, video file, graphics file
or software program comprising the fully disclosed complete spec, creates
a nondisclosing synopsis of the spec, and clicks the "submit" icon
available on the web site. The originator is then asked by the system to
agree to the terms of a submission agreement. Originator agrees to the
terms of the submission agreement and the fully disclosed spec is stored
in a secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made available to an
intended and identifiable user, or to a plurality of potential users, via
the World Wide Web. A user may scroll through nondisclosing synopses of
available specs by category or may utilize the system's search engine to
identify and rank relevant nondisclosing synopses of available specs. If
a user is interested in reviewing the entire spec, user clicks on the
"access" icon for the corresponding nondisclosing synopsis. The user is
then asked by the system to agree to the terms of a license agreement
granting the user the right to review and consider the originator's spec.
The license may be exclusive or nonexclusive as determined by the
submitting originator. If user agrees, user is granted access to the
entire spec for consideration pursuant to the terms of the on-line
license agreement. If user is interested in further analysis and/or in
purchasing or otherwise acquiring the rights to the spec, user contacts
originator to negotiate the terms of the deal (e.g., license, purchase,
development, etc.).

[0231]FDI: Electronic Game Concept

[0232]An originator desires to submit, confidentially (i.e., pursuant to a
confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement) or nonconfidentially (i.e.,
no confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement), a specification for a
new electronic game concept ("spec") to a potential user (i.e.,
individual or entity looking for new electronic game concepts) (e.g.,
software or other technology company, video game manufacturer,
university, venture capitalist, entrepreneur, etc.) for review and
consideration. The originator logs onto a web site (e.g., central
controller 200) and inputs identifying information and qualifications,
attaches a text file, inputs free-form text, and/or uploads an audio
file, video file, graphics file or software program comprising the fully
disclosed complete spec, creates a nondisclosing synopsis of the spec,
and clicks the "submit" icon available on the web site. The originator is
then asked by the system to agree to the terms of a submission agreement.
Originator agrees to the terms of the submission agreement and the fully
disclosed spec is stored in a secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis
is made available to an intended and identifiable user, or to a plurality
of potential users, via the World Wide Web. A user may scroll through
nondisclosing synopses of available specs by category or may utilize the
system's search engine to identify and rank relevant nondisclosing
synopses of available specs. If a user is interested in reviewing the
entire spec, user clicks on the "access" icon for the corresponding
nondisclosing synopsis. The user is then asked by the system to agree to
the terms of a license agreement granting the user the right to review
and consider the originator's spec. The license may be exclusive or
nonexclusive as determined by the submitting originator. If user agrees,
user is granted access to the entire spec for consideration pursuant to
the terms of the on-line license agreement. If user is interested in
further analysis and/or in purchasing or otherwise acquiring the rights
to the spec, user contacts originator to negotiate the terms of the deal
(e.g., license, purchase, development, etc.).

[0233]FDI: Grant Proposal Criteria

[0234]An originator desires to submit, confidentially (i.e., pursuant to a
confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement) or nonconfidentially (i.e.,
no confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement), a grant proposal to a
potential user (i.e., grant giver) (e.g., foundation, university,
government agency, nonprofit organization, etc.) for review and
consideration. The originator logs onto a web site (e.g., central
controller 200) and inputs identifying information and qualifications,
attaches a text file or inputs free-form text comprising the fully
disclosed complete grant proposal, creates a nondisclosing synopsis of
the grant proposal, and clicks the "submit" icon available on the web
site. The originator is then asked by the system to agree to the terms of
a submission agreement. Originator agrees to the terms of the submission
agreement and the fully disclosed grant proposal is stored in a secure
database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made available to an intended and
identifiable user, or to a plurality of potential users, via the World
Wide Web. A user may scroll through nondisclosing synopses of available
grant proposals by category or may utilize the system's search engine to
identify and rank relevant nondisclosing synopses of available grant
proposals. If a user is interested in reviewing the entire grant
proposal, user clicks on the "access" icon for the corresponding
nondisclosing synopsis. The user is then asked by the system to agree to
the terms of a license agreement granting the user the right to review
and consider the originator's grant proposal. The license may be
exclusive or nonexclusive as determined by the submitting originator. If
user agrees, user is granted access to the entire grant proposal for
consideration pursuant to the terms of the on-line license agreement. If
user is interested in further analysis and/or in providing a grant to the
submitting originator, user contacts originator to negotiate the terms of
the grant. The following examples demonstrate potential needs of users
and represent the user-driven component of the present invention:

[0235]RFP: Motion Picture Screenplay

[0236]A user (i.e., movie studio, production company, Hollywood agency or
agent) is seeking an original screenplay meeting defined development
criteria (e.g., drama, period piece, love story, etc.). Rather than
commission a screenwriter directly to write the original screenplay
meeting the development criteria, the user desires to submit,
confidentially or nonconfidentially, a request for proposed screenplays
("open assignment") globally to originators (e.g., screenwriters,
Hollywood agents or managers, etc.) for his/her/their review and
consideration. User logs onto a web site and inputs identifying
information and specific development criteria, attaches a text, audio,
video or graphics file or inputs free-form text comprising the fully
disclosed open assignment, creates a nondisclosing synopsis of the open
assignment, and clicks the "submit" icon available on, the web site. User
is then asked by the system to agree to the terms of a submission
agreement. User agrees to the terms of the submission agreement and the
fully disclosed open assignment is stored in a secure database. The
nondisclosing synopsis is made available to an intended and identifiable
originator, to a plurality of originators, or globally to potential
originators via the World Wide Web. An originator may scroll through
nondisclosing synopses of available open assignments by category or may
utilize the system's search engine to identify and rank relevant
nondisclosing synopses of open assignments. If an originator is
interested in reviewing the entire open assignment, originator clicks on
the "access" icon for the corresponding nondisclosing synopsis. The
originator is then asked by the system to agree to the terms of a license
agreement granting the originator the right to review and consider the
fully disclosed open assignment. The license may be exclusive or
nonexclusive as determined by the soliciting user. If originator agrees,
originator is granted access to the entire open assignment for
consideration pursuant to the terms of the on-line license agreement. If
originator is interested in further analysis, originator contacts the
soliciting user for further due diligence. If user has agreed to receive
proposed screenplays from originators, an originator may submit
his/her/its screenplay as an FDI (fully disclosed idea) in the same
manner described above. The soliciting user is then able to scroll
through all NDSes submitted as proposed screenplays or may utilize the
system's search engine to identify and rank relevant screenplays meeting
the open assignment criteria, and access, pursuant to the terms of an
on-line license agreement, only those proposed screenplays that the user
determines warrant further consideration. Alternatively, proposed
screenplays may be submitted directly to the soliciting user. If the
soliciting user is interested in further analysis and/or in purchasing or
otherwise acquiring the rights to a screenplay, soliciting user contacts
the submitting originator to negotiate the terms of the deal (e.g.,
license, option, purchase, development, etc.).

[0237]RFP: Business Opportunity

[0238]A user (i.e., venture capital firm, angel investor, strategic
partner, etc.) is seeking an original business plan or concept meeting
defined investment and/or development criteria (e.g., wireless
application software, business-to-business chemical marketplace, etc.).
The user desires to submit, confidentially or nonconfidentially, a
request for proposed business plans or concepts ("RFP") globally to
originators (e.g., entrepreneurs, established companies, etc.) for
his/her/their review and consideration. User logs onto a web site and
inputs identifying information and specific development criteria,
attaches a text, audio, video or graphics file or inputs free-form text
comprising the fully disclosed RFP, creates a nondisclosing synopsis of
the RFP, and clicks the "submit" icon available on the web site. User is
then asked by the system to agree to the terms of a submission agreement.
User agrees to terms of the submission agreement and the fully disclosed
RFP is stored in a secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made
available to an intended and identifiable originator, to a plurality of
originators, or globally to potential originators via the World Wide Web.
An originator may scroll through nondisclosing synopses of available RFPs
by category or may utilize the system's search engine to identify and
rank relevant nondisclosing synopses of RFPs. If an, originator is
interested in reviewing the entire RFP, originator clicks on the "access"
icon for the corresponding nondisclosing synopsis. The originator is then
asked by the system to agree to the terms of a license agreement granting
originator the right to review and consider the fully disclosed RFP. The
license may be exclusive or nonexclusive as determined by the soliciting
user. If originator agrees, originator is granted access to the entire
RFP for consideration pursuant to the terms of the on-line license
agreement. If originator is interested in further analysis, originator
contacts the soliciting user for further due diligence. If user has
agreed to receive proposed screenplays from originators, an originator
may submit his/her/its business plan or concept as an FDI (fully
disclosed idea) in the same manner described above. The soliciting user
is then able to scroll through all NDSes submitted as proposed business
plans or concepts or may utilize the system's search engine to identify
and rank relevant business plans or concepts meeting the RFP criteria,
and access, pursuant to the terms of an on-line license agreement, only
those proposed business plans or concepts that the user determines
warrant further consideration. Alternatively, proposed business plans or
concepts may be submitted directly to the soliciting user. If the
soliciting user is interested in further analysis, financing and/or in
purchasing or otherwise acquiring the rights to a business plan or
concept, soliciting user contacts the submitting originator to negotiate
the terms of the deal (e.g., license, option, purchase, investment,
development, etc.).

[0239]RFP: Application Software

[0240]A user (i.e., individual or entity looking for a specific solution)
(e.g., Internet company or other business entity, entrepreneur, etc.) is
seeking a software application meeting defined development criteria
(e.g., wireless application software, system architecture, etc.). The
user desires to submit, confidentially or nonconfidentially, a request
for proposed software applications ("RFP") globally to originators (e.g.,
entrepreneurs, established companies, software engineers, etc.) for
his/her/their review and consideration. User logs onto a web site and
inputs identifying information and specific development criteria,
attaches a text, audio, video or graphics file, or inputs free-form text
comprising the fully disclosed RFP, creates a nondisclosing synopsis of
the RFP, and clicks the "submit" icon available on the web site. User is
then asked by the system to agree to the terms of a submission agreement.
User agrees to the terms of the submission agreement and the fully
disclosed RFP is stored in a secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis
is made available to an intended and identifiable originator, to a
plurality of originators, or globally to potential originators via the
World Wide Web. An originator may scroll through nondisclosing synopses
of available RFPs by category or may utilize the system's search engine
to identify and rank relevant nondisclosing synopses of RFPs. If an
originator is interested in reviewing the entire RFP, originator clicks
on the "access" icon for the corresponding nondisclosing synopsis. The
originator is then asked by the system to agree to the terms of a license
agreement granting originator the right to review and consider the fully
disclosed RFP. The license may be exclusive or nonexclusive as determined
by the soliciting user. If originator agrees, originator is granted
access to the entire RFP for consideration pursuant to the terms of the
on-line license agreement. If originator is interested in further
analysis, originator contacts the soliciting user for further due
diligence. If user has agreed to receive proposed software applications
from originators, an originator may submit his/her/its software
application as an FDI (fully disclosed idea) in the same manner described
above. The soliciting user is then able to scroll through all NDSes
submitted as proposed software applications or may utilize the system's
search engine to identify and rank relevant software applications meeting
the RFP criteria, and access, pursuant to the terms of an on-line license
agreement, only those proposed software applications that the user
determines warrant further consideration. Alternatively, proposed
software applications may be submitted directly to the soliciting user.
If the soliciting user is interested in further analysis, financing
and/or in purchasing or otherwise acquiring the rights to a software
application, soliciting user contacts the submitting originator to
negotiate the terms of the deal (e.g., license, option, purchase,
investment, development, etc.).

[0241]RFP: Book Manuscript

[0242]A user (i.e., individual or entity looking for original book
manuscripts) (e.g., publishing company, literary agent, etc.) is seeking
a book manuscript meeting defined development criteria (e.g., life story,
period piece, etc.). The user desires to submit, confidentially or
nonconfidentially, a request for proposed book manuscripts ("RFP")
globally to originators (e.g., writers, literary agents, publishers,
etc.) for his/her/their review and consideration. User logs onto a web
site and inputs identifying information and specific development
criteria, attaches a text, audio, video or graphics file, or inputs
free-form text comprising the fully disclosed RFP, creates a
nondisclosing synopsis of the RFP, and clicks the "submit" icon available
on the web site. User is then asked by the system to agree to the terms
of a submission agreement. User agrees to the terms of the submission
agreement and the fully disclosed RFP is stored in a secure database. The
nondisclosing synopsis is made available to an intended and identifiable
originator, to a plurality of originators, or globally to potential
originators via the World Wide Web. An originator may scroll through
nondisclosing synopses of available RFPs by category or may utilize the
system's search engine to identify and rank relevant nondisclosing
synopses of RFPs. If an originator is interested in reviewing the entire
RFP, originator clicks on the "access" icon for the corresponding
nondisclosing synopsis. The originator is then asked by the system to
agree to the terms of a license agreement granting originator the right
to review and consider the fully disclosed RFP. The license may be
exclusive or nonexclusive as determined by the soliciting user. If
originator agrees, originator is granted access to the entire RFP for
consideration pursuant to the terms of the on-line license agreement. If
originator is interested in further analysis, originator contacts the
soliciting user for further due diligence. If user has agreed to receive
proposed book manuscripts from originators, an originator may submit
his/her/its software book manuscript as an FDI (fully disclosed idea) in
the same manner described above. The soliciting user is then able to
scroll through all NDSes submitted as proposed book manuscripts or may
utilize the system's search engine to identify and rank relevant book
manuscripts meeting the RFP criteria, and access, pursuant to the terms
of an on-line license agreement, only those proposed book manuscripts
that the user determines warrant further consideration. Alternatively,
proposed book manuscripts may be submitted directly to the soliciting
user. If the soliciting user is interested in further analysis, financing
and/or in purchasing or otherwise acquiring the rights to a book
manuscript, soliciting user contacts the submitting originator to
negotiate the terms of the deal (e.g., license, option, purchase,
investment, development, etc.).

[0243]RFP: Musical Composition

[0244]A user (i.e., individual or entity looking for original musical
compositions). (e.g., publishing company, literary agent, record,
company, musician, etc.) is seeking a musical composition meeting defined
development criteria (e.g., rhythm, tempo, cadence, period piece, etc.).
The user desires to submit, confidentially or nonconfidentially, a
request for proposed musical composition ("RFP") globally to originators
(e.g., songwriters, literary agents, publishers, record companies,
musicians etc.) for his/her/their review and consideration. User logs
onto a web site and inputs identifying information and specific
development criteria, attaches a text, audio, video or graphics file, or
inputs free-form text comprising the fully disclosed RFP, creates a
nondisclosing synopsis of the RFP, and clicks the "submit" icon available
on the web site. User is then asked by the system to agree to the terms
of a submission agreement. User agrees to the terms of the submission
agreement and the fully disclosed RFP is stored in a secure database. The
nondisclosing synopsis is made available to an intended and identifiable
originator, to a plurality of originators, or globally to potential
originators via the World Wide Web. An originator may scroll through
nondisclosing synopses of available RFPs by category or may utilize the
system's search engine to identify and rank relevant nondisclosing
synopses of RFPs. If an originator is interested in reviewing the entire
RFP, originator clicks on the "access" icon for the corresponding
nondisclosing synopsis. The originator is then asked by the system to
agree to the terms of a license agreement granting the originator the
right to review and consider the fully disclosed RFP. The license may be
exclusive or nonexclusive as determined by the soliciting user. If
originator agrees, originator is granted access to the entire RFP for
consideration pursuant to the terms of the on-line license agreement. If
originator is interested in further analysis, originator contacts the
soliciting user for further due diligence. If user has agreed to receive
proposed musical compositions from originators, an originator may submit
his/her/its software musical composition as an FDI (fully disclosed idea)
in the same manner described above. The soliciting user is then able to
scroll through all NDSes submitted as proposed musical compositions or
may utilize the system's search engine to identify and rank relevant
musical compositions meeting the RFP criteria, and access, pursuant to
the terms of an on-line license agreement, only those proposed musical
compositions that the user determines warrant further consideration.
Alternatively, proposed musical compositions may be submitted directly to
the soliciting user. If the soliciting user is interested in further
analysis, financing and/or in purchasing or otherwise acquiring the
rights to a musical composition, soliciting user contacts the submitting
originator to negotiate the terms of the deal (e.g., license, option,
purchase, investment, development, 4etc.).

[0245]RFP: Toy Concept

[0246]A user (i.e., individual or entity looking for original toy
concepts) (e.g., toy developer, toy manufacturer, etc.) is seeking a toy
concept meeting defined development criteria (e.g., age range, material,
etc.). The user desires to submit, confidentially or nonconfidentially, a
request for proposed toy concepts ("RFP") globally to originators (e.g.,
toy developers, toy manufacturers, inventors, etc.) for his/her/their
review and consideration. User logs onto a web site and inputs
identifying information and specific development criteria, attaches a
text, audio, video or graphics file, or inputs free-form text comprising
the fully disclosed RFP, creates a nondisclosing synopsis of the RFP, and
clicks the "submit" icon available on the web site. User is then asked by
the system to agree to the terms of a submission agreement. User agrees
to terms of the submission agreement and the fully disclosed RFP is
stored in a secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made available
to an intended and identifiable originator, to a plurality of
originators, or globally to potential originators via the World Wide Web.
An originator may scroll through nondisclosing synopses of available RFPs
by category or may utilize the system's search engine to identify and
rank relevant nondisclosing synopses of RFPs. If an originator is
interested in reviewing the entire RFP, originator clicks on the "access"
icon for the corresponding nondisclosing synopsis. The originator is then
asked by the system to agree to the terms of a license agreement granting
originator the right to review and consider the fully disclosed RFP. The
license may be exclusive or nonexclusive as determined by the soliciting
user. If originator agrees, originator is granted access to the entire
RFP for consideration pursuant to the terms of the on-line license
agreement. If originator is interested in further analysis, originator
contacts the soliciting user for further due diligence. If user has
agreed to receive proposed toy concepts from originators, an originator
may submit his/her/its software toy concept as an FDI (fully disclosed
idea) in the same manner described above. The soliciting user is then
able to scroll through all NDSes submitted as proposed toy concepts or
may utilize the system's search engine to identify and rank relevant toy
concepts meeting the RFP criteria, and access, pursuant to the terms of
an on-line license agreement, only those proposed toy concepts that the
user determines warrant further consideration. Alternatively, proposed
toy concepts may be submitted directly to the soliciting user. If the
soliciting user is interested in further analysis, financing and/or in
purchasing or otherwise acquiring the rights to a toy concept, soliciting
user contacts the submitting originator to negotiate the terms of the
deal (e.g., license, option, purchase, investment, development, etc.).

[0247]RFP: Advertising Slogan

[0248]A user (e.g., ACE Hardware) desires implementation of a new national
advertising campaign. Rather than retain an advertising agency to develop
the campaign, the user desires to submit a request for proposed
advertising slogans directly to its consumers. The user logs onto a web
site and inputs identifying information and criteria, attaches a text
file comprising the fully disclosed need (e.g., description of products
or services to be marketed, desired length of slogan, etc.), creates a
nondisclosing synopsis of the need, and clicks on the "submit" icon
available on the web site. The user is then asked by the system to agree
to the terms of a submission agreement. User agrees to the terms of the
submission agreement and the fully disclosed need is stored in a secure
database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made available globally via the
World Wide Web to a plurality of potential originators capable of
proposing slogans or directly to an intended and identifiable user. If an
originator is interested in reviewing the entire fully disclosed need,
originator clicks on the "access" icon. The originator is then asked by
the system to agree to the terms of a license agreement granting the user
the right to review and consider the user's fully disclosed need. If
originator agrees, originator is granted access to the entire need for
consideration pursuant to the terms of the on-line license agreement. If
originator is interested in proposing a solution to the user's need
(e.g., a slogan such as "ACE is the place with the helpful hardware man")
for use by the soliciting user, originator submits the proposed solution
as an FDI (fully disclosed idea) in the manner described above. The
soliciting user is then able to review all NDSes submitted as proposed
solutions and to access, pursuant to an on-line license agreement, only
those fully disclosed solutions which the user determines warrant further
consideration. If soliciting user identifies a slogan it wishes to use,
user negotiates for the right to use the originator's proposed slogan.
Terms are negotiated, payment is submitted to originator, and user is
granted the right to use originator's slogan according to the terms of a
negotiated agreement.

[0249]RFP: Company Trade Name

[0250]A user (i.e., individual or entity looking for original company
trade names) (e.g., advertising agency, new business entity, existing
company, etc.) is seeking a trade name meeting defined development
criteria (e.g., descriptive, domain name, etc.). The user desires to
submit, confidentially or nonconfidentially, a request for proposed trade
names ("RFP") globally to originators (e.g., individuals, advertising
agencies, marketing professionals, etc.) for his/her/their review and
consideration. User logs onto a web site and inputs identifying
information and specific development criteria, attaches a text, audio,
video or graphics file, or inputs free-form text comprising the fully
disclosed RFP, creates a nondisclosing synopsis of the RFP, and clicks
the "submit" icon available on the web site. User is then asked by the
system to agree to the terms of a submission agreement. User agrees to
the terms of the submission agreement and the fully disclosed RFP is
stored in a secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made available
to an intended and identifiable originator, to a plurality of
originators, or globally to potential originators via the World Wide Web.
An originator may scroll through nondisclosing synopses of available RFPs
by category or may utilize the system's search engine to identify and
rank relevant nondisclosing synopses of RFPs. If an originator is
interested in reviewing the entire RFP, originator clicks on the "access"
icon for the corresponding nondisclosing synopsis. The originator is then
asked by the system to agree to the terms of a license agreement granting
the originator the right to review and consider the fully disclosed RFP.
The license may be exclusive or nonexclusive as determined by the
soliciting user. If originator agrees, originator is granted access to
the entire RFP for consideration pursuant to the terms of the on-line
license agreement. If originator is interested in further analysis,
originator contacts the soliciting user for further due diligence. If
user has agreed to receive proposed trade names from originators, an
originator may submit his/her/its software trade name as an FDI (fully
disclosed idea) in the same manner described above. The soliciting user
is then able to scroll through all NDSes submitted as proposed trade
names or may utilize the system's search engine to identify and rank
relevant trade names meeting the RFP criteria, and access, pursuant to
the terms of an on-line license agreement, only those proposed trade
names that the user determines warrant further consideration.
Alternatively, proposed trade names may be submitted directly to the
soliciting user. If the soliciting user is interested in further
analysis, financing and/or in purchasing or otherwise acquiring the
rights to a trade name, soliciting user contacts the submitting
originator to negotiate the terms of the deal (e.g., license, option,
purchase, investment, development, etc.).

[0251]RFP: Service Mark

[0252]A user (i.e., individual or entity looking for original service
marks) (e.g., advertising agency, new business entity, existing company,
etc.) is seeking a service mark meeting defined development criteria
(e.g., descriptive, domain name, etc.). The user desires to submit,
confidentially or nonconfidentially, a request for proposed service marks
("RFP") globally to a plurality of originators or directly to one or more
intended and identifiable originators (e.g., individuals, advertising
agencies, marketing professionals, etc.) for his/her/their review and
consideration. User logs onto a web site and inputs identifying
information and specific development criteria, attaches a text, audio,
video or graphics file, or inputs free-form text comprising the fully
disclosed RFP, creates a nondisclosing synopsis of the RFP, and clicks
the "submit" icon available on the web site. User is then asked by the
system to agree to the terms of a submission agreement. User agrees to
the terms of the submission agreement and the fully disclosed RFP is
stored in a secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made available
to an intended and identifiable originator, to a plurality of
originators, or globally to potential originators via the World Wide Web.
An originator may scroll through nondisclosing synopses of available RFPs
by category or may utilize the system's search engine to identify and
rank relevant nondisclosing synopses of RFPs. If an originator is
interested in reviewing the entire RFP, originator clicks on the "access"
icon for the corresponding nondisclosing synopsis. The originator is then
asked by the system to agree to the terms of a license agreement granting
the originator the right to review and consider the fully disclosed RFP.
The license may be exclusive or nonexclusive as determined by the
soliciting user. If originator agrees, originator is granted access to
the entire RFP for consideration pursuant to the terms of the on-line
license agreement. If originator is interested in further analysis,
originator contacts the soliciting user for further due diligence. If
user has agreed to receive proposed service marks from originators, an
originator may submit his/her/its service mark as an FDI (fully disclosed
idea) in the same manner described above. The soliciting user is then
able to scroll through all NDSes submitted as proposed service marks or
may utilize the system's search engine to identify and rank relevant
service marks meeting the RFP criteria, and access, pursuant to the terms
of an on-line license agreement, only those proposed service marks that
the user determines warrant further consideration. Alternatively,
proposed service marks may be submitted directly to the soliciting user.
If the soliciting user is interested in further analysis, financing
and/or in purchasing or otherwise acquiring the rights to a service mark,
soliciting user contacts the submitting originator to negotiate the terms
of the deal (e.g., license, option, purchase, investment, development,
etc.).

[0253]RFP: Product Trademark

[0254]A user (i.e., individual or entity looking for original product
trademarks) (e.g., advertising agency, new business entity, existing
company, etc.) is seeking a product trademark meeting defined development
criteria (e.g., descriptive, domain name, etc.). The user desires to
submit, confidentially or nonconfidentially, a request for proposed
product trademarks ("RFP") globally to a plurality of originators or
directly to one or more intended and identifiable originators (e.g.,
individuals, advertising agencies, marketing professionals, etc.) for
his/her/their review and consideration. User logs onto a web site and
inputs identifying information and specific development criteria,
attaches a text, audio, video or graphics file, or inputs free-form text
comprising the fully disclosed RFP, creates a nondisclosing synopsis of
the RFP, and clicks the "submit" icon available on the web site. User is
then asked by the system to agree to the terms of a submission agreement.
User agrees to the terms of the submission agreement and the fully
disclosed RFP is stored in a secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis
is made available to an intended and identifiable originator, to a
plurality of originators, or globally to potential originators via the
World Wide Web. An originator may scroll through nondisclosing synopses
of available RFPs by category or may utilize the system's search engine
to identify and rank relevant nondisclosing synopses of RFPs. If an
originator is interested in reviewing the entire RFP, originator clicks
on the "access" icon for the corresponding nondisclosing synopsis. The
originator is then asked by the system to agree to the terms of a license
agreement granting the originator the right to review and consider the
fully disclosed RFP. The license may be exclusive or nonexclusive as
determined by the soliciting user. If originator agrees, originator is
granted access to the entire RFP for consideration pursuant to the terms
of the on-line license agreement. If originator is interested in further
analysis, originator contacts the soliciting user for further due
diligence. If user has agreed to receive proposed product trademarks from
originators, an originator may submit his/her/its product trademark as an
FDI (fully disclosed idea) in the same manner described above. The
soliciting user is then able to scroll through all NDSes submitted as
proposed product trademarks or may utilize the system's search engine to
identify and rank relevant product trademarks meeting the RFP criteria,
and access, pursuant to the terms of an on-line license agreement, only
those proposed product trademarks that the user determines warrant
further consideration. Alternatively, proposed product trademarks may be
`submitted directly to the soliciting user. If the soliciting user is
interested in further analysis, financing and/or in purchasing or
otherwise acquiring the rights to a product trademark, soliciting user
contacts the submitting originator to negotiate the terms of the deal
(e.g., license, option, purchase, investment, development, etc.).

[0255]RFP: Chemical Composition

[0256]A user (i.e., individual or entity looking for original chemical
compositions) (e.g., chemical company, scientist, government research
entity, etc.) is seeking a chemical composition meeting defined
development criteria (e.g., physical properties, odorless, etc.). The
user desires to submit, confidentially or nonconfidentially, a request
for proposed chemical compositions ("RFP") globally to originators (e.g.,
scientists, university professors, chemical development companies, etc.)
for his/her/their review and consideration. User logs onto a web site and
inputs identifying information and specific development criteria,
attaches a text, audio, video or graphics file, or inputs free-form text
comprising the fully disclosed RFP, creates a nondisclosing synopsis of
the RFP, and clicks the "submit" icon available on the web site. User is
then asked by the system to agree to the terms of a submission agreement.
User agrees to terms of the submission agreement and the fully disclosed
RFP is stored in a secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made
available to an intended and identifiable originator, to a plurality of
originators, or globally to potential originators via the World Wide Web.
An originator may scroll through nondisclosing synopses of available RFPs
by category or may utilize the system's search engine to identify and
rank relevant nondisclosing synopses of RFPs. If an originator is
interested in reviewing the entire RFP, originator clicks on the "access"
icon for the corresponding nondisclosing synopsis. The originator is then
asked by the system to agree to the terms of a license agreement granting
the originator the right to review and consider the fully disclosed RFP.
The license may be exclusive or nonexclusive as determined by the
soliciting user. If originator agrees, originator is granted access to
the entire RFP for consideration pursuant to the terms of the on-line
license agreement. If originator is interested in further analysis,
originator contacts the soliciting user for further due diligence. If
user has agreed to receive proposed chemical compositions from
originators, an originator may submit his/her/its software chemical
composition as an FDI (fully disclosed idea) in the same manner described
above. The soliciting user is then able to scroll through all NDSes
submitted as proposed chemical compositions or may utilize the system's
search engine to identify and rank relevant chemical compositions meeting
the RFP criteria, and access, pursuant to the terms of an on-line license
agreement, only those proposed chemical compositions that the user
determines warrant further consideration. Alternatively, proposed
chemical compositions may be submitted directly to the soliciting user.
If the soliciting user is interested in further analysis, financing
and/or in purchasing or otherwise acquiring the rights to a chemical
composition, soliciting user contacts the submitting originator to
negotiate the terms of the deal (e.g., license, option, purchase,
investment, development, etc.).

[0257]RFP: Product Enhancement

[0258]A user (i.e., individual or entity looking for original product
enhancements) (e.g., automobile manufacturer, consulting firm, etc.) is
seeking a product enhancement meeting defined development criteria (e.g.,
lighter weight, greater strength, etc.). The user desires to submit,
confidentially or nonconfidentially, a request for proposed product
enhancements ("RFP") globally to originators (e.g., research entities,
inventors, scientists, etc.) for his/her/their review and consideration.
User logs onto a web site and inputs identifying information and specific
development criteria, attaches a text, audio, video or graphics file, or
inputs free-form text comprising the fully disclosed RFP, creates a
nondisclosing synopsis of the RFP, and clicks the "submit" icon available
on the web site. User is then asked by the system to agree to the terms
of a submission agreement. User agrees to the terms of the submission
agreement and the fully disclosed RFP is stored in a secure database. The
nondisclosing synopsis is made available to an intended and identifiable
originator, to a plurality of originators, or globally to potential
originators via the World Wide Web. An originator may scroll through
nondisclosing synopses of available RFPs by category or may utilize the
system's search engine to identify and rank relevant nondisclosing
synopses of RFPs. If an originator is interested in reviewing the entire
RFP, originator clicks on the "access" icon for the corresponding
nondisclosing synopsis. The originator is then asked by the system to
agree to the terms of a license agreement granting the originator the
right to review and consider the fully disclosed RFP. The license may be
exclusive or nonexclusive as determined by the soliciting user. If
originator agrees, originator is granted access to the entire RFP for
consideration pursuant to the terms of the on-line license agreement. If
originator is interested in further analysis, originator contacts the
soliciting user for further due diligence. If user has agreed to receive
proposed product enhancements from originators, an originator may submit
his/her/its software product enhancement as an FDI (fully disclosed idea)
in the same manner described above. The soliciting user is then able to
scroll through all NDSes submitted as proposed product enhancements or
may utilize the system's search engine to identify and rank relevant
product enhancements meeting the RFP criteria, and access, pursuant to
the terms of an on-line license agreement, only those proposed product
enhancements that the user determines warrant further consideration.
Alternatively, proposed product enhancements may be submitted directly to
the soliciting user. If the soliciting user is interested in further
analysis, financing and/or in purchasing or otherwise acquiring the
rights to a product enhancement, soliciting user contacts the submitting
originator to negotiate the terms of the deal (e.g., license, option,
purchase, investment, development, etc.).

[0259]RFP: Electronic Game Concept

[0260]A user (i.e., individual or entity looking for original electronic
game concepts) (e.g., game developer, game publisher, etc.) is seeking an
electronic game concept meeting defined development criteria (e.g.,
character type, adventure, etc.). The user desires to submit,
confidentially or nonconfidentially, a request for proposed electronic
game concepts ("RFP") globally to originators (e.g., game developers,
software engineers, game development companies, etc.) for his/her/their
review and consideration. User logs onto a web site and inputs
identifying information and specific development criteria, attaches a
text, audio, video or graphics file, or inputs free-form text comprising
the fully disclosed RFP, creates a nondisclosing synopsis of the RFP, and
clicks the "submit" icon available on the web site. User is then asked by
the system to agree to the terms of a submission agreement. User agrees
to the terms of the submission agreement and the fully disclosed RFP is
stored in a secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made available
to an intended and identifiable originator, to a plurality of
originators, or globally to potential originators via the World Wide Web.
An originator may scroll through nondisclosing synopses of available RFPs
by category or may utilize the system's search engine to identify and
rank relevant nondisclosing synopses of RFPs. If an originator is
interested in reviewing the entire RFP, originator clicks on the "access"
icon for the corresponding nondisclosing synopsis. The originator is then
asked by the system to agree to the terms of a license agreement granting
the originator the right to review and consider the fully disclosed RFP.
The license may be exclusive or nonexclusive as determined by the
soliciting user. If originator agrees, originator is granted access to
the entire RFP for consideration pursuant to the terms of the on-line
license agreement. If originator is interested in further analysis,
originator contacts the soliciting user for further due diligence. If
user has agreed to receive proposed electronic game concepts from
originators, an originator may submit his/her/its software electronic
game concept as an FDI (fully disclosed idea) in the same manner
described above. The soliciting user is then able to scroll through all
NDSes submitted as proposed electronic game concepts or may utilize the
system's search engine to identify and rank relevant electronic game
concepts meeting the RFP criteria, and access, pursuant to the terms of
an on-line license agreement, only those proposed electronic game
concepts that the user determines warrant further consideration.
Alternatively, proposed electronic game concepts may be submitted
directly to the soliciting user. If the soliciting user is interested in
further analysis, financing and/or in purchasing or otherwise acquiring
the rights to an electronic game concept, soliciting user contacts the
submitting originator to negotiate the terms of the deal (e.g., license,
option, purchase, investment, development, etc.).

[0261]RFP: Grant Proposal

[0262]A user (i.e., individual or entity looking for original grant
proposals) (e.g., foundation, university, government agency, nonprofit
organization, etc.) is seeking a grant proposal meeting defined
development criteria (e.g., dollar amount of grant, medical research,
community investment, etc.). The user desires to submit, confidentially
or nonconfidentially, a request for proposed grant proposals ("RFP")
globally to a plurality of originators or directly to one or more
intended and identifiable originators (e.g., individuals, nonprofit
organizations, social entrepreneurs, etc.) for his/her/their review and
consideration. User logs onto a web site and inputs identifying
information and specific development criteria, attaches a text, audio,
video or graphics file, or inputs free-form text comprising the fully
disclosed RFP, creates a nondisclosing synopsis of the RFP, and clicks
the "submit" icon available on the web site. User is then asked by the
system to agree to the terms of a submission agreement. User agrees to
the terms of the submission agreement and the fully disclosed RFP is
stored in a secure database. The nondisclosing synopsis is made available
to an intended and identifiable originator, to a plurality of
originators, or globally to potential originators via the World Wide Web.
An originator may scroll through nondisclosing synopses of available RFPs
by category or may utilize the system's search engine to identify and
rank relevant nondisclosing synopses of RFPs. If an originator is
interested in reviewing the entire RFP, originator clicks on the "access"
icon for the corresponding nondisclosing synopsis. The originator is then
asked by the system to agree to the terms of a license agreement granting
the originator the right to review and consider the fully disclosed RFP.
The license may be exclusive or nonexclusive as determined by the
soliciting user. If originator agrees, originator is granted access to
the entire RFP for consideration pursuant to the terms of the on-line
license agreement. If originator is interested in further analysis,
originator contacts the soliciting user for further due diligence. If
user has agreed to receive proposed grant proposals from originators, an
originator may submit his/her/its grant proposal as an FDI (fully
disclosed idea) in the same manner described above. The soliciting user
is then able to scroll through all NDSes submitted as proposed grant
proposals or may utilize the system's search engine to identify and rank
relevant grant proposals meeting the RFP criteria, and access, pursuant
to the terms of an on-line license agreement, only those proposed grant
proposals that the user determines warrant further consideration.
Alternatively, proposed grant proposals may be submitted directly to the
soliciting user. If the soliciting user is interested in further
analysis, financing and/or in purchasing or otherwise acquiring the
rights to a grant proposal, soliciting user contacts the submitting
originator to negotiate the terms of the deal (e.g., license, option,
purchase, investment, development, etc.).

[0263]Those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention
has many applications in all industry segments, and that the applications
disclosed herein are merely representative and not exhaustive. The scope
of the present invention incorporates known and anticipated applications,
modifications and variations of and to the system components described
herein, as would be known by those skilled in the art. The scope of this
invention is defined by the following claims.