I"ve seen yesterday the av-comparatives test results and even that firstly I was a little angry because NOD32 was again No.3 then I realised it has been significantly improved since the latest on-demand test.

So I want to congratulate you and keep going that way!

Anyway , I have a sugestion: I think it will be a good ideea to add to your signature database alll the Trojans and script viruses you've missed to this test and thus NOD will have a better detection rate!

I"ve seen yesterday the av-comparatives test results and even that firstly I was a little angry because NOD32 was again No.3 then I realised it has been significantly improved since the latest on-demand test.

So I want to congratulate you and keep going that way!

Anyway , I have a sugestion: I think it will be a good ideea to add to your signature database alll the Trojans and script viruses you've missed to this test and thus NOD will have a better detection rate!

Well, I haven't seen any major update containing those viruses missed and also no ESET Mod answer my topic.

Click to expand...

I would say Eset don't care about some zoo virii you won't ever meet...
(that was true until now, latest AV-comp review seems to show the contrary).
Proactive detection ITW or fast response time in case of a "real" threat is more important I think.

Yes, but what do u say if u came across an old virus that NOD32 doesn't detect? And I have this kind of viruses, sent them to ESET and they didn't add them. Anyway I have to admit..they've improved since the latest av-comparatives.

I heard from Macros that old virus are obsolute now and no longer destructive or something like that. I got a few varients of old viruses that were submitted some months ago and they didn't get added too.