Friday, 17 December 2010

Our most improtant issue: Relations with Jews

Apologies for a very long post. But it addresses what I think is the most fundamental and important issue facing us today.

The primary objective of this blog is to catalogue, and hopefully in some small way repel, the relentless attack on western civilization. This attack, which has been and continues to be spectacularly successful, has a number of key components:

Demonisation of whites as the source of all the world’s ills - the corollary being the deification of non-whites, especially blacks.Mass immigration of Third World immigrants (black, Muslim, Hispanic) to western – i.e. white – lands:

Forced integration of neighbourhoods and schools.

Multiculturalism and cultural relativism

Affirmative Action (AA) in its various forms whereby gentile whites are disadvantaged at every turn

Relentless media propagandizing of black/white miscegenation

Feminism – primarily directed at emasculating the white male (the oppressor) and the legitimising (encouraging?) of homosexuality, same-sex marriages etc.

The undermining of traditional patriarchal Western institutions (church, ‘traditional’ family etc.)

So-called ‘hate’ legislation and the closing down of all contrary opinion on the desirability of the foregoing objectives.
I could literally write a book on just the previous paragraph, but readers of this blog, supporters and opponents alike, hardly need more detail. The interesting thing is that the proponents of this agenda are now so confident they don't even try to deny these developments. And why should they? They’ve been successful beyond their wildest expectations in TheLong March Through The Institutions.

Net effect, the civilization of the white race, which created modern society, freedom of conscience, the rule of law, individual rights, as well as virtually everything that’s worthwhile in the arts and sciences, is reeling under the onslaught, and its forthcoming demise is unashamedly celebrated.

The big questions we must answer:

This post has a specific focus, and one of what I believe to be unparalleled importance. It asks, and tries to answer, the following questions:

Have Jews been the main instigators of this assault?.If so, why?.What proportion of Jews have been involved?.Are these developments in the real interests of the majority of Jews?.And finally, can, and, should, white gentiles seek common ground with Jewish interests to combat this collapse of Western society?

Did/do Jews mastermind this assault?

Well, there’s a compelling case to say they did.

The 20th Century intellectual and academic world kicked the process off and did the heavy lifting in terms of providing an intellectual framework and toolsets applicable to deconstructing white power and validity. It took many forms. Jewish intellectuals led the battle against the idea that races even exist and against the idea that there are biologically-based differences in intelligence or cultural achievement. In fact this form of thinking can be traced back as far as Spinoza, and of course Marx provided a toolset to undermine the economic underpinnings of society and for the attack on nationalism and religion.

Franz Boaz was immensely influential in propagating the theory that there were no genetic differences between races, or at least none that determined intelligence and other key characteristics. The scale of his achievement has been phenomenal, and he’s really the creator of the cognitive dissonance we see today in relation to race. In other words everyone professes to believe that there are no racially-based differences in characteristics or innate intelligence, despite being simultaneously overwhelmed with evidence to the contrary. This cognitive dissonance, in believing what your eyes and ears tell you is untrue, has proven to be an invaluable tool in hastening the destruction of European-based culture. Reminds me of the old Groucho Marx quip ‘are you going to believe me …… or the evidence of your own eyes?’

Freud proposed the theory of a universal human nature (”the common basis of human life”) and then theorised that all individual differences resulted from environmental influences. These influences in turn (he postulated) derived from a repressive, inhumane society, traditional institutions and the socio-religious categorizations of gentile society. Anti-Semitism could thus be explained as a form of gentile psychopathology resulting from projections, repressions, and reaction formations stemming ultimately from a pathology-inducing society. In other words if you disagreed you were a nutcase!

Lévi-Strauss created a whole new school of thought devoted to cultural relativism (which is a nice was of saying the West bad, everyone else good). In particular he fostered the concept that Third World cultures, irrespective of how awful they were, (see my post here) had to be not alone preserved but treasured. This naturally undermined European universal ideas such as reason, religious tolerance, science, progress and liberal democracy. Lévi-Strauss’ concepts eventually lead to an academic ‘industry’ that today not only thrives, but thrives as never before. Every academic curriculum today is infested with ‘Black Studies’ and ‘White Studies’ and increasingly, courses related to Islam. All needless to say, focus on the same objective, demonising white Christian culture and extolling the virtues of its opposites.

The so-called Frankfurt School consolidated and built on these intellectual foundations into a programme geared to abolishing cohesive and nationalistic gentile groups and their associated group norms. Using Freud they presented them as manifestations of psychopathology, and where membership of Christian religions and close family relationships indicated psychiatric disorder.

The impact
The impact of this intellectual warfare has been successful to a degree its originators could scarcely have imagined, and can be said to be embodied in multiculturalism. Here is where the most serious, fundamental and intractable damage to the west has occurred. I say this because while you can argue with ideas and intellectual frameworks, mass Third World immigration to the west (the fundamental prerequisite for multiculturalism) and the consequent diluting of the white gene pool, cannot be undone.

For instance the US, Britain and France, arguably the most powerful and influential western nations, have been fundamentally, and irredeemably, changed over the last fifty years or so. If you’re a regular reader of this blog you’ll realise the catastrophic impact this has had in terms of increased crime, racial and ethnic strife, welfare dependence, compounded by a general dumbing down and an overall degeneration of social cohesion.

Mass immigration means borders have to be opened up. Again, Jewish groups lead this particular war. They still do. I might add that it’s only the west’s borders that have to be opened. Asia, Africa and the Middle East were all happily, for them, exempted from this requirement. And they still are. There’s no point in going over all the details. Suffice to say that Jewish politicians of every hue, academics, business leaders, and even some trade unionists, relentlessly championed mass immigration from non-European sources.

S. M. Neuringer (himself Jewish) informs us that “In order to sway immigration in a liberal direction, Jewish spokespersons and organizations demonstrated a degree of energy unsurpassed by any other interested pressure group. Immigration had constituted a prime object of concern for practically every major Jewish defence and community relations organization. Over the years, their spokespersons had assiduously attended congressional hearings, and the Jewish effort was of the utmost importance in establishing and financing such non-sectarian groups as the National Liberal Immigration League and the Citizens Committee for Displaced Persons.”

He could have added that this enthusiasm was confined entirely to immigrants from the Third World.

Dominance of “minority rights” groups such as the ACLU, NAACP and the SPLC in the US also provided invaluable platforms to further these ends and to exacerbate their impact by undermining segregation.

Even anti-Semitic immigrants are encouraged
We know that there’s been a sharp increase in anti-Semitism in Europe in recent years. We also know that it’s entirely down to the mass influx of Muslim cultural enrichers. You’d imagine then that Jewish organisations here would strongly advocate the prohibition of further Islamic immigration. But intriguingly the opposite is the case.

Political parties that oppose Muslim immigration and by extension the anti-Semitism of those immigrants are denounced by Jewish groups as neo-Nazis throughout Europe. For example The Dutch daily paper ‘De Pers’ (04-06-2010) pointed out that only 2% of Dutch Jews votes for Gerd Wilders compared to 25% of the native Dutch

The same Jewish groups seem to do everything possible to play down Muslim involvement and encourage further immigration. We can see a good example of this in Sweden, where Jews have been virtually driven out of Malmo by Religion Of Peaceniks. Yet listen to Barbara Spectre, who set up and runs an Institute of Jewish learning in Stockholm explaining things perfectly:

“I think that there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that; it’s a huge transformation to make they are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role, but without that leading role and without that transformation Europe will not survive.”
In effect she’s saying that Jews will put up with attacks from Muslims, and unpopularity with Europeans due to Jewish support of mass immigration, but that the eventual multiculti nirvana will make it worthwhile.

Strange.

Or is it? All will shortly be revealed.

The pivotal role of ‘hate’ legislation

How has the anti-white, multiculti project been so successful? Successful to the extent that today certain places and institutions in the west, created exclusively by and for white people, can be described as ‘hideously white’ by some dusky-skinned interloper from the arse-end of nowhere? Whereby any attempt at even implicit white separatism (clubs, schools, residential areas etc.) is vigorously pursued and countered by forced integration via school bussing, Section 8 housing measures and a panoply of big stick legislation.

And therein lies one of the cornerstones of the agenda’s success. A virtual tsunami of ‘human rights’ and ‘hate’ legislation. Ostensibly aimed at curtailing speech advocating violence against ethnic or religious minorities, this has morphed into a catch-all for prohibiting anything that conflicts with the multi-cult, PC, mass immigration agenda. In practice it’s worked out so that white gentiles, and only white gentiles, are prosecuted under its terms. In the US the usual suspects, the Anti-Defamation League, Southern Poverty Law Center, the Center for Democratic Renewal and the American Civil Liberties Union – all either fully Jewish or controlled by Jews – have been its main drivers and enforcers.

And it’s not only in America. For example in Australia also Jewish organisations have been leading the push to criminalise unacceptable speech. Andrew Fraser, a former professor of public law at Macquarie University in Sydney, landed in severe legal trouble for suggesting that “once black African colonies in Australia grow in size and in confidence, one can reasonably expect a number of social problems and rising levels of crime and violence.”

This should have been as controversial as saying the sun rises in the east, yet an African immigrant saw fit to institute charges against him. In fact Fraser noted that the process had actually been instigated by “several organized Jewish groups that boast openly of the campaign they have organized against me” citing articles in Jewish newspapers. Fraser wrote that Jewish individuals and organisations had acted “to further their shared ethnic interest in the growth of a multi-racial society in Australia.”
The effect of such legislation and practice has been to define a whole range of topics as outside the scope of normal discourse. Offenders in business, academia or the media transgress at their peril. At best your career can be ruined, at worst you could face criminal charges capable of sending you to jail and/or bankrupting you.

Hollywood creates a new fantasy world

For better or worse, well, worse actually, Hollywood, the TV networks and the major advertising agencies represent the de facto arbiters of contemporary western culture. These institutions are dominated by Jews, allied to a cohort of like-minded left liberal gentiles. From them has emanated, over the last fifty years or so, a relentless unending brainwashing exercise hardly seen on this side of what was the Iron Curtain.

And if you have any doubt as to Jewish control, consider this extract from an article from the LA Times in December 2008. “I have never been so upset by a poll in my life. Only 22% of Americans now believe "the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews," down from nearly 50% in 1964. The Anti-Defamation League, which released the poll results last month, sees in these numbers a victory against stereotyping. Actually, it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood.”

The writer then went on to demonstrate, in devastating detail, just how deep and wide this control really is.

All of this has lead to the creation of a new fantasy world, as divorced from reality as the world of Harry Potter. Everywhere we look we see blacks and other non-whites portrayed in a favourable light, whites the opposite. Blacks are judges, scientists, professors, and honest policemen fighting crooked whites. They’re even loyal family men, for Chissake! The ‘Nobel Savage’ is portrayed as just that – pure and noble until corrupted by the whites. We’ve even had a number of security-related ads which portrayed white burglars breaking into black homes!

All in flagrant defiance of reality, needless to say. But this is where the institutionalising of the cognitive dissonance I referred to earlier comes into play. Whites have now to a greater or lesser degree internalised these fantasies. Which in turn facilitates the acceptance of their ‘guilt’ and their accommodating to an agenda for what is in effect their destruction as a distinct ethnie. A critical outcome of this is their accepting the normalising of black/white sexuality. We are bombarded, relentlessly, unceasingly with miscegenation propaganda in film, the MSM and the advertising realm. And have been for fifty years. Even the US Army now has a ‘safe sex’ ad featuring, quelle surprise? a black male and a blonde female. More than anything else this normalisation, added to the mass immigration of blacks into white countries, sows the seeds of white destruction. Because it cannot be reversed.

The Soros agenda

Which brings me to a more sinister possibility via the remarkable George Soros. Now full disclosure here: George and I are friends. He emails me regularly and refers to me as his friend. Ok, so there are about 12 million other recipients of these emails, but….. Now I admit that George’s Open Society Initiatives does have a few good elements.

And some not so good elements.

I have in mind particularly his Public Health Program in Eastern Europe where ‘health’ manifests itself in strange forms. These include reducing the ‘unhealthy’ role of family and church on students, which “still carries an imprint of nationalist, sexist, racist, and homophobic prejudices rampant in the society at large.” There was a time when I'd have agreed 100% with this, but, well, what’s it actually got to do with health?

Maybe this becomes clearer if we look at his “Women’s Health” programs in Central and South-Eastern Europe. George’s main goal here is “to improve the quality of abortion services.” Wha??? Yes, he has focused on the introduction of easily available abortion all over the region, and manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) abortion in Macedonia, Moldova, and Russia.

Now why would he want to encourage abortion in countries where the white population is actually declining precipitously, even without his, er, help? Why not focus entirely on the teeming hell holes of the Third World where they breed like lemmings, and once old enough to rob the travel costs, hightail it to the west?

A good question, I think you’ll agree, and one that I’ll return to shortly, if you’ll bear with me.

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury

So that's my ‘case for the prosecution’, as it were. In case you thing I'm partial, in conclusion I’ll hand over to a couple of Jewish sources to support it.

Leading activist Ben Wattenberg, for example, has said that “The non-Europeanization of America is heartening news of an almost transcendental quality.”Going back a bit further we have Rabbi Rabbinovitch, stating at a special meeting of the emergency council of European Rabbis in Budapest on January 12th 1952: ‘Our control commission, in the interests of peace and wiping out interracial tension, will forbid the whites to cohabit with whites. The white women must cohabit with members of the dark races, the white men with black women. Thus the white race will disappear, for mixing the dark with the white means the end of the white man and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory.’

I could cite a hundred such examples.

A question of motivation

Now I come to the third question: Why did Jews do what I've just found them guilty of?

Kevin McDonald claims that Jewish intellectual and political movements “are attempts to alter Western societies in a manner that would neutralize or end anti-Semitism and enhance the prospects for Jewish group continuity.” In other words to lessen the power of the European-derived majority in ‘western’ countries in order to prevent the development of an ethnically homogenous anti-Jewish movement.

Earl Raab, a prominent Jewish activist explained why Jews have led immigration "reform” movements that favour non-whites. “We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country”

And indeed common sense, and reputable research, support this view. Research by Triandis (1990, 1991) on cross-cultural differences in individualism and collectivism indicates that anti-Semitism would be lowest in individualist societies rather than societies that are collectivist and homogeneous Levinson also notes that individuals who themselves belong to groups with a strong in-group ideology, such as sororities, are more likely to be more anti-Semitic.

A less charitable interpretation

But then there’s also a less charitable interpretation,, succinctly presented in an earlier comment about a year ago by "Ezra" to this blog which I noted at the time. He (she?) said “Jews believe that once the rest of the world has fallen far enough, they will reign by default because they are racist, cohesive, disciplined and clever enough remain intact and standing whereas everyone else has been dumbed down, indoctrinated, isolated and atomized through utilization of Government, mass media and culture to impose the corrosive Judeo-fascist design upon society.”

Wow.

But that might ring a bell with Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, “spiritual” mentor of the fundamentalist Shas party, a key member of the ruling coalition in Israel. He reportedly said during a Sabbath homily that "the sole purpose of non-Jews is to serve Jews."

Thomas Sowell ascribes part of the explanation to the fact that “Jews emerged from the ghetto with hostility toward the culture around them” and “Jewish hostility toward the culture of non-Jews has been a constant threat throughout Jewish history”

We can also see a similar and consistent theme running through Soros’s beliefs: that all countries are basically social arrangements, artificial, temporary and potentially dangerous. A plethora of quotes from his writings will make it clear that he thinks that owing allegiance to any of them is inherently irrational, and attaching one’s personal loyalty to it is absurd. Like Marx’s proletarian, or Stalin’s rootless cosmopolitans, Soros knows of no loyalty to a concrete country.

As we saw earlier, Freud believed that by undermining gentiles’ pride in themselves, psychoanalysis would weaken anti-Semitism. Freud also spoke of the “many dark emotional powers” that bonded Jews together. MacDonald finds similar motivations in the work of Franz Boas and in that of the Frankfurt school.

So, in summarising motivation we can say that their past persecution has given Jews not only a negative attitude toward white gentiles, but a desire to protect themselves from further persecution. And, some would say, driven by their ‘eye for an eye’ and ‘never forgive, never forget’ mentality, a taste for revenge. The destruction of white gentiles and our culture ostensibly serves both these purposes.

And why single us out? Well, first we’re the ones who caused almost all of their historical grief, and, as we’ve demonstrated time and again, the only ones intelligent and resourceful enough to do it again on a massive scale.

Do as I say, not as I do.

Before leaving this section I'd like to provide a few morsels for those of you who like irony, as most Jews see no problem in openly identifying with Israel and Jewish civilization generally. Here’s an egregious example from Isi Leibler, a long-standing and staunch defender of Australian multiculturalism. He’s fought tooth and nail for mass immigration from the Third World. He has bitterly opposed any mention of resurrecting the ‘white Australia’ policy and was one of those attacking Professor Fraser.

Yet here’s what Isi says about Israel: “This is a country which was set up and created as a Jewish country for the Jews”. Interestingly, this was told to a Jerusalem newspaper, not an Australian one. Only last month Netenyahu proclaimed “We must stop the mass entry of illegal migrant workers because of the very serious threat to the character and future to the state of Israel,” Just this week I read that Israel is building a ‘detention facility’ in the desert to hold illegal immigrants. Netenhayu explains that letting these into Israel proper would have “very harsh repercussions on the character and future of the state of Israel” Such attitudes are widespread, and new Israeli legislation will deny citizenship even to the spouses of Jews if such were non-Jewish. Even without this of course Israel’s Law of Return is blatantly based on race and religion determinants (based on tracing descent to a Jewish mother) – the ultimate bugbears if practiced in the west.

Again, miscegenation, marrying outside the race or group, is viewed in the most serious terms by Jews, even secular ones. I remember as a kid the ceremonial ‘burying’ in the case of the Goldberg family here in Cork when one of them married out. But any white daft enough to proclaim he’d never marry a Jew or a black would also be buried - under an avalanche of PC bullshit.

However Affirmative Action (AA) is the arena where Jews have contrived the ultimate ‘and with a bound our hero was free’ manoeuvre. (I've also written about it here). Being the proponent of AA would seem to be an act of extreme altruism on the part of Jews. After all, as a white cognitive elite they’d be the first to bite the dust under the stampede of the worthy but underprivileged masses. Wouldn’t they? Well no, actually. As that post shows, AA, which has had such a catastrophic impact of on gentile whites, appears to have miraculously passed them by!

AA involves elite universities and major corporations actively recruiting minorities, always at the expense of better qualified whites. Yet for the most part, law schools, medical schools and other arenas of Jewish fiefdom have been left untouched by these quotas, for the simple fact that bringing a slew of minorities into these places would upset the applecart of Jewish monopoly in these fields.

Here’s just one example from taken from Harvard admission statistics.

Ron Unz, in an article in the Wall Street Journal provided us with the following chart which shows the full extent of Jewish over-representation and gentile white under-representation. Due to a highly active AA policy at the university, blacks and Hispanics are over-represented based on IQ, although under-represented given their ratio of the overall population. Gentile whites on the other hand are vastly under-represented – by orders of magnitude, as the chart shows. However, the real gem is the Jewish figure. They’re over-represented by a factor of nearly ten!

Unz concluded his article by pointing out the uncomfortable fact: “Thus, it appears that Jews and Asians (Asians not represented on the chart) constitute approximately half of Harvard’s student body, leaving the other half for the remaining 95% of America.” If you want to know, additional analysis showed that the big, big losers were low-income gentile whites.

So congratulations guys (and tough luck goys!) for pulling off such a stunt.

Is all of this really in Jews’ ongoing interests?
The previous section showed us that there’s a massive double standard prevailing under which Jews as an ethnic group, and Israel as a Jewish ethno-state, benefit hugely. We’ve also seen how the overall undermining of traditional white gentile society has been unimaginably successful.

But here I posit the question, are these developments ultimately in the interests of Jews?

If things continue as they are, within a few decades the US will be like Brazil while most of western/northern Europe will be the way Blackburn, Malmo – or even Johannesburg – are today. A white (gentile and Jewish) cognitive elite will control the wealth and power, and will reside in comfort (if not in safety) while a vast, violent, poverty-stricken and crime-ridden underclass seethes in teeming slums.

Take a step back. Even when wealthy and relatively – I emphasise relatively - safe physically, I believe living in a violent, seriously unequal, crime-ridden balkanized society takes its toll on the elites of those societies, if only morally and psychologically. Are their ethnic and commercial interests optimised in such an environment? Will black, Hispanic and Muslim mobs quietly acquiesce to their dispossession the way white gentiles have done?

Already Religion of Peaceniks are behind the rise of violent anti-Semitism in many parts of Europe. As their numbers and confidence grow, so will their aggression. The ‘Zionists’ (read Jews) will be the primary target for their guns, bombs and knives. Have no doubt about that. “Kankerjood” (“cancer Jew”) has become a favorite insult among the Dutch Muslim community; some Swedish friends tell me that Muslims have begun greeting one another with the simple phrase ‘Kill Jews’ (as in, ‘Hey, kill Jews. How’s it going?’) Dutch and Belgian rap groups recorded ‘kankerjood’ songs with lyrics like ‘F--- the Jews, cancer Jews, the allochtonenwil come and kill you…’”

The bluff can last only so long

And Jews are also subject, by a form of osmosis, to the same miscegenation brainwashing as are gentile whites. While not succumbing so far at anything like the same rate. they cannot remain immune indefinitely. Anecdotal evidence suggests that in fact such out-breeding with darker races is increasing in recent years.

It also seems unlikely that Jews, as a white cognitive elite, can keep getting away with pushing all the cost of AA on to white gentiles. Huge numbers of AA seeking immigrants will put increasing pressure on the system, which will turn the spotlight on Jews’ unique position, and may also drive white gentiles to the point of open rebellion. Again, there are some signs that this is already starting to happen.

Getting to the meat: What do we mean by ‘Jews’?

Increasing numbers of Jews are beginning to cotton on to these implications. Which brings me to another, and maybe the second most important question of this post: To what extent can we talk about ‘Jews’ in all of these developments, and even more important, in future developments? In other words, what proportion of Jews were, and much more importantly, are now, involved in the undermining of white gentile society?

If a sizeable ratio of Jews did not and does not subscribe to or support the destruction of gentile white society, we, as gentile whites, are faced with a rich opportunity. The opportunity is that it opens us up to gaining the active support of those very Jews in our efforts. And if I have a lot of Jews supporting my agenda I get a warm feeling. Because the very characteristics that contributed so much to the success of their assault can now be brought to bear on the problems caused by that assault. The kind of characteristics I have in mind are superior intelligence, diligence and hard work, strong ethnic networking skills and relentlessness in pursuit of goals.

God knows, we can do with some of that. But we won't get it as things stand, even if we assume that there’s latent support out there. It seems to me that any potentially sympathetic Jewish reader of a white nationalist (I’ll use that term for convenience) website, or book, or any medium, in fact, would eventually start to feel out of place, if not downright unwelcome. Invariably there will be a section which excoriates ‘the Jews’, and this Jewish reader would, in due course, feel uncomfortable about progressing further.

This creates a vicious cycle, whereby ‘we’ blame the Jews, who understandably see themselves cast as the enemy, and hence become one, or are at least unwilling to help.

So, to the question: What proportion of Jews was responsible for the current debacle? What proportion actively promoted mass immigration from the Third World, affirmative action, miscegenation and the whole white male guilt trip? And if we establish that, we must then ask whether this proportion is fixed our changing, and if changing, by how much and in what direction.

There are Jews and Jews

Reading the earlier sections of this post you could perhaps draw the conclusion that all Jews, and only Jews, were responsible for the current predicament. But that’s in fact very far from the truth. At all stages strong Jewish voices opposed the agenda, and crucially, this opposition seems to be growing strongly.

Go back to Ron Unz, who blew the whistle on the unfairness Harvard admission practices. Unz is Jewish! And George Soros, usually presented as our bete noir, is most definitely not Numero Uno with his fellow Jews either.

Rabbi Mayer Schiller is a prominent Jewish thinker who argues in favour of racial separatism and the preservation of European and European-American culture and identity. He clearly admits that “group identity is a fundamental need of all men” and “Europeans, White people and those attached to traditional faiths and lifestyles of the West are told by the powers-that-be that they alone among mankind's tribes are forbidden to have or even articulate a collective identity”

Robert Weissberg is Jewish and a former professor of political science at UI Champaign/Urbana. He explains that even though American Jews are largely intimidated, scared, and disgusted by blacks, so many of them support black (read: anti-white) causes because they have a compulsive and irrational – his word - fear of white Christians. He believes that these feelings are changing.

And remember the vital article in the LA Times that blew the gaff on Jewish control of Hollywood? Well, that was written by Joel Stein – who is Jewish.

Steven Steinlight, a senior policy analyst at the Center for Immigration Studies and a former staff member at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum and AJC believes that present immigration policy no longer serves Jewish interests. He believes the new immigrants are less likely to be sympathetic to Israel and because they are more likely to view Jews as the wealthiest and most powerful group in the U.S.—and thus a potential enemy—rather than as victims of the Holocaust. He is particularly worried about the consequences of Islamic fundamentalism among Muslim immigrants, especially for Israel, and he condemns the “savage hatred for America and American values” among the fundamentalists.

He also mentioned Hispanics. Far from being grateful to Jews for their immigration support, a number of polls, including one commissioned for the ADL (I love it!) showed a higher level of anti-Semitism among Latin American immigrants than for any other group of Americans.

Here’s another item: William J Robinson, a Jewish sociology professor at the University of California–Santa Barbara, sent an email to his students juxtaposing what he termed "parallel images of Nazis and Israelis" — Jews victimized during the Holocaust and Palestinians attacked by Israel during the recent Gaza invasion. And yes, I did say Jewish sociology professor!

Most Jews support the Arizona immigration law
Most significantly, despite the massive support for open borders in the US from Jewish organizations, Jews on average show far less support for these measures. In fact their support for Arizona’s new immigration law is not much different to that of the average gentile white. A recent survey by the American Jewish Committee showed that fifty-two percent of the respondents supported the law, while 46 percent were against.

“What we’ve found is a gigantic gulf between the pulpit and the pew [on the issue], and this is true of every religion in America, including Jews,” said Steven Steinlight. “Not only is it a slam dunk that Americans don’t support illegal immigration or amnesty, but Jews are no different.”

This distinction is described by James Petras, a strong critic of the American-Israeli nexus, as one in which an organized, active minority drives the major Zionist organizations and their billionaire camp followers. And it is always the organised, zealous and well-financed minority, which assumes 'legitimate' claim to speak 'for the community.’”

In other words, the guilty ones in the context of this post are not ordinary Jews, rather what Petras describes as the organized, active minority… and their billionaire camp followers.

I see this as a crucial distinction, and central to a proposition I’ll make shortly.

Some other perspectives

If you sampled the politics of gentile whites who have an average IQ of 115 I’ll bet you’d find they’d be disproportionably ‘liberal/progressive’. Why? Well, who knows? But I'd say a number of factors contribute. They’d share a patrician distaste for ‘white trash’ and their reactionary views, they can indulge their moral superiority in relation to minorities without having to live among them, and they can preen on their superior intelligence, as evidenced by those very views. Now it so happens that Ashkenazi Jews, on average, have IQs of 115 or so. Why then should they not evince similar views? In other words, the criticism I levelled earlier against Jews can be explained, at least in part, by their high IQs.

Their animus towards the majority is also surely replicated among other minorities, wherever they may be. Blacks in white society immediately spring to mind, but what about Muslims in the West, Hispanics in the US or gypsies, who truly loathe majority society? So if Jews do or did feel this animosity, as a minority they’re certainly not alone.

And a final thought: I mentioned how Ashkenazi Jews have average IQs of about 115. As a vast body of research shows, those with that level of intelligence are characterised by high levels of achievement. I think Jews are in addition more likely to be driven, ambitious and relentless. Is it any wonder then that they seem to take leading roles in everything? A bit like Europeans in Africa, come to think of it.

My Manifesto

So here’s my position. Yes, Jews were the prime movers in the subversion of white gentile society. Yes, they need to be called out on that as I have done. However, as I hope I’ve shown, Jews are far from being a monolithic entity, and the evidence suggests that the majority of ‘ordinary’ Jews may in fact be receptive to the defence of white gentile society, if for no other reason than that it’s a lot more palatable than the alternatives.

The fact that they were able to achieve such destruction shows their power and capabilities. Would it not vastly enhance our cause had we a sizeable proportion, perhaps even a large majority, fighting on ‘our’ side? Yes, surely. But we’ll never know if they continue, en mass, to be demonised in almost every white gentile forum.

So my proposal is to hold out the hand of friendship to decent ordinary Jews who face pretty much the same challenges as we do. For a start the blanket condemnations of ‘the Jews’ for the collapse of white gentile society must stop, or at least become more nuanced. We racially conscious gentiles must accept that we are not innocent victims cruelly deceived and exploited by alien masters. Rather, the transformations that I, for one, so bitterly resent took place in our own countries, controlled by our own people, and we must accept responsibility for them.

We therefore should seek to convince ordinary Jews that they have more in common with us than with the “organized, active minority… and their billionaire camp followers.” We sure as hell won’t do that by constantly attacking Jews in general .Of course, we also need some more prominent Jewish figures (I've already mentioned a few) to publicly acknowledge the validity of ‘our’ concerns and that we’re not all closet Nazis secretly plotting a new Holocaust. Many of them too must be fed up of killing Nazism, digging it up, killing it again, ad nauseam.

I think this is, by a wide margin, the single most important challenge - and opportunity -facing us now. It seems crazy not to consider obtaining the support of the most effective operators on the planet.

Am I not correct?

And think of this: What would we have lost if – and I don’t think this will happen - we’re rebuffed?

227 comments:

Thought-provoking. I'm not as confident as you. It may well be that ordinary Jews see things pretty much as the rest of us, but in the end, as that guy said, their elites and the most ethno-centric ones will make the running. And the rest will follow.

Surely since the Jews have been able to dominate and control white thinking and behaviour so completely that whites have allowed their own societies to be destroyed and their own children's futures to be blighted then ipso facto the Jews deserve to be our masters and we whites deserve to be their slaves.

worst case scenario…the world becomes islamic, whites adapt, excel in their new religion, and the jews are screwed by their own guile. Remember…whites went from their own polytheism to catholicism , to protestantism, and quite possibly now, to islam. how muny muslims will there be in the world then, and how pissed off at the jews will they be? but there is more…what will stop christian whites from being kryptochristians? it worked well for the jews, it will work for the christians as well.

Jadaism has rightly been described as the 'beating heart' of Western Civilization. If the West is ever to be whole again, it must see anti-semitism for what it is: a disorder at the cellular level. We must align with Jews.

The disproportionate share of these issues that is being carried by Jewish elites in the US is not unnoticed and it is creating a great deal of exploitable rage. In fairness, as Savant has pointed out, the Jewish component of the US elite class is probably no worse per capita than the rest of that elite, but they are overrepresented by a factor of 10-15 in said elite. In addition, it is a far more easily differentiated group to get one's hate on against than SWPL liberal whites. I don't expect this to end well. My natural disposition is to favor Israel but in the final analysis, my feelings about a group are essentially the integral of their prior actions towards me and mine.

I think you aren't seeing the wood for the trees. The rich want multiculturalism. Joos make up a high proportion of the rich. It is not a generational plan to wipe us out. It is simply greed. Rich people want to avoid paying decent salaries to workers. How do they avoid paying well? Make sure the working man (from toilet cleaner to IT professional) can't up his salary by withhold his labour. Immigration is fantastic for the rich.

I might say also that this prospect of moving our jobs to China is going to take the pressure off bringing in masses of immigrants. I do see a problem here though. I think the politicians especially in the UK (think Jack Straw and his ilk) don't know the reasons for immigration and these people are zealots with their own fucked up agenda. So getting these monsters to stop is not going to be easy.

As to why their are so many rich Joos. Take the Irish in the East of the USA. As a group they are big overachievers. Three reasons for this I think.1) When in a minority an ethnic group gives each other a helping hand.2) People who emmigrate tend to be the smart ones or the ones with drive.3) They got in at the right time (when NY and other cities were expanding rapidly).

I don't think the Joos are our enemy. I think the rich are. In a sense we are our own enemies because any one of us who gets rich is probably likely to take on this attitude of the rich where they don't give a shit about their own kind and focus on the money.

I have to go now but if this post remains the first post I'll add more.

When jews oppose whites and white interest they are the enemy ,when they scheme to force white societies to do jewish bidding they are the enemy.They have been recocnized as the solvent of society for thousands of years ,were all our ancestors stupid?If the jews whant to stay in white society they must support the white way of doing things or move to Israel.The argument that judaism is at the heart of western culture shows a very clear lack of knowledge about judaism as well as the inluence so called paganism in christianity.The vedic way of the aryans are alive in white society although we dont know it.My view is that the jews should be watched very carefully and that the white race should study the talmud to understand jewish thinking.Even my kabalah professor believes genetic jews should rule the world when the third temple rises.Let everyone inform himself about this, I fully agree not all jews are bad but there is a very well organised part of them that certainl should be watched.

‘Our control commission, in the interests of peace and wiping out interracial tension, will forbid the whites to cohabit with whites. The white women must cohabit with members of the dark races, the white men with black women. Thus the white race will disappear, for mixing the dark with the white means the end of the white man and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory.’

Blaming "the rich" is far more simpleminded than blaming the J**s.The West has had loads of rich people since the early period of the industrial revolution- yet only in the last two or three generations have the ruling elites of the West seemingly been dedicated to the destruction of their own societies.

Why-for example-did the "the rich" of the US-then almost entirely non-Jewish- passively assent to the shutting off of immigration in 1924? The main opposition to the legislation came from ethnic Jewish orgs.

Anyway, the ruling elites are not the same as "the rich". Corporate executives and investment bankers do not mainly concern themselves with molding the minds of the masses. Mencius Moldbug (half-Jewish)points out that the core of "The Cathedral" is made up of senior federal civil service, federal judiciary, big media and Harvard.

The Jewish elites caused a situation wherein Jews will not feel safe anywhere in the world anti semitism is spreading very fast in all cultures. The new move to incorporate jews into white nationalism is absurd at best, since when did they care for anyone but themselves. The so called movers and shakers as you call them are being exposed for the criminals that they are.Now that they find the liberals to be the enemy of Israel they run back to the conservatives.

Good stuff Reg. Reminds me of back in SA. We whites would not have had the trouble we did if we didn't employ so many porch monkeys to do the manual work for us. That's the same mistake wealthy whites are making in the west. And with the same consequences, I believe.

"Jadaism has rightly been described as the 'beating heart' of Western Civilization. If the West is ever to be whole again, it must see anti-semitism for what it is: a disorder at the cellular level. We must align with Jews."

anon 15.28 says -I fully agree not all jews are bad but there is a very well organised part of them that certainl should be watched. Fair enough. But the main point of the post I think is that there are enough to support us so as to make a real dofference.

Damn, you had me worried about where you were going with this post! Thank you for keeping your head about you. I wholeheartedly agree with your proposal. Well done with putting it out there.

I follow a couple of blogs and with few exceptions, the Jewish bloggers are by far the most potent in their attacks against liberals. Some brilliant journalists/bloggers/freedom fighters are Charles Krauthammer, Andrew Breitbart, Pamela Geller, David Horowitz, Jonah Goldberg, Illana Mercer, Robert Spencer, Ezra Lavant and Mark Steyn - all Jewish.

It is obvious that you are right and that there are many, many brave and decent Jews in this world. Think Moshe Dayan. I would love to have the likes of him on our side when the forthcoming conflict with the dark races finally manifests itself.

Chance of that? Zero.

Chance of seperating good Jews from evil Jews? Zero.

That has been our experience in Germany. During the 19th and early 20th century our various monarchs have tried their utmost to seperate the "good Jew" demographic from their evil brethren and integrate them to our nation's mainstream.

While many decent Jews heeded the call of the fatherland and lived good and productive lives, they could never bring themselves to denounce their evil twins. The communists. The agitators. The financial fraudsters. The so called artists working tirelesly to promote every known and unknown variety of sexual deviancy among impressionable young Germans.

Because the Jews themselves never could bring themselves to create a rupture between the good and evil elements among themselves, ordinary Germans came to identify the Jews as a monolithic block. We all know how well that turned out for the Jews.

I see the same thing happening today. How many rabbis have stood before a TV camera and said: "Ben Bernanke, Lloyd Blankfein, Jamie Dimon - We, the Jewish people denounce you!" I am not aware of such a thing occuring.

Decent Jews still seem unable to distance themselves from even the most brazen criminals. For that reason I fear that Jews will - again - collectively pay for the misdeeds of the few. Their famed cohesiveness will - again - paint a target (or maybe a yellow star) on their backs.

For all their undoubted abilities the Jews seem to have one fatal flaw. A compulsion if you will. Every century or so they allow allow a bunch of evildoers to besmirch their whole community with the most wicked acts of criminality. A nightmare of of hate and progroms promptly ensues. Rinse, repeat.

They have to break the circle themselves. White nationalists cannot do a job that Jews ought and must do themselves.

The other weakness Jews have, IMHO, is that they keep pushing until they, and the 'pushees' topple over the precipice together. I think they're heading that way in the US right now. May seem in an impregnable position, but it's possible that people will start joining up the dots and some unpleasant pictures will emerge.

Now is the time, before it's too late, for good Jews to stand up and be counted.

Anon 21.17. What utter rubbish. Have you seen the attacks against George Soros by his fellow Jews? You spew the kind of tripe that I imagine gave rise to the Holocaust, the shame of the white race.

I'm a white South African, hated by blacks like the Jews are hated by whites. Let me tell you, you wouldn't be saying such things had the shoe been on the other foot and you will bear the consequences for your intellectual laziness some day - sooner than later. Enjoy the confusion, which will sink in when you least need it!

"Blaming "the rich" is far more simpleminded than blaming the J**s.The West has had loads of rich people since the early period of the industrial revolution- yet only in the last two or three generations have the ruling elites of the West seemingly been dedicated to the destruction of their own societies." Right and only in the last few generations has the wealth started to get spread out better. Only in the last while has mass immigration become a possibility. Before this politicians couldn't do it because they'd never get elected again. The liberal agenda has been preached for so long now and so intently that the populace actually think mass immigration is a good thing. Remember, most people don't actually think things through, they read and adopt their opinions from the rags they read. The press is so much more powerful than ordinary people give it credit for. Of course this power hasn't gone unnoticed by the clever people. They use this power to get what they want, that is, to get people to vote for the candidate they favor. Our problem as I see it is the media and the liberals who have infested it. Politics is also a big problem because the same mindless liberals have infested that too. To halt the shit you need to start with the media. The liberal nazi politicians will be replaced once people are not bombarded with the liberal muck. All a few "respected" newspapers have to do is point out the fact that the king is naked. Then this whole thing will reverse itself.Human beings let fads take hold all the time. Many fads go way too far but one thing they have in common is at some point the right people get tired of the fads. They speak out and all the dopey lemmings shake off their madness and look for some other fad to get behind. This multiculturalism will stop at some point. The only problem is how to reverse it. All these cultural enrichers will not leave volinterily. Worse still, their countries of origin will not accept them back if they are being forced. So what happens? Something extreme, thats for sure.

"Why-for example-did the "the rich" of the US-then almost entirely non-Jewish- passively assent to the shutting off of immigration in 1924? The main opposition to the legislation came from ethnic Jewish orgs."Since I don't know the history there I can only guess. Was it down to Joos trying to escape from Europe? If that is the case then I can see why Joos would oppose the blocking of more immigration. Secondly, I think there was a lot more patriotism back in the 1920s, with a war just ended and another about to start. I think the rich may have felt patriotic back then. I do know they don't feel it now. As my name suggests I work in investment banking, hedge funds to be precise. I have relationships with many rich people and I can gauge their feelings from remarks they make. I can tell you I have never come accross a rich person who is a nationalist. If you spoke to the people I speak to then you'd know the idea is totally preposterous too.

Human beings let fads take hold all the time. Many fads go way too far but one thing they have in common is at some point the right people get tired of the fads. They speak out and all the dopey lemmings shake off their madness and look for some other fad to get behind. This multiculturalism will stop at some point. The only problem is how to reverse it. All these cultural enrichers will not leave volinterily. Worse still, their countries of origin will not accept them back if they are being forced. So what happens? Something extreme, thats for sure.

"Why-for example-did the "the rich" of the US-then almost entirely non-Jewish- passively assent to the shutting off of immigration in 1924? The main opposition to the legislation came from ethnic Jewish orgs."Since I don't know the history there I can only guess. Was it down to Joos trying to escape from Europe? If that is the case then I can see why Joos would oppose the blocking of more immigration. Secondly, I think there was a lot more patriotism back in the 1920s, with a war just ended and another about to start. I think the rich may have felt patriotic back then. I do know they don't feel it now. As my name suggests I work in investment banking, hedge funds to be precise. I have relationships with many rich people and I can gauge their feelings from remarks they make. I can tell you I have never come accross a rich person who is a nationalist. If you spoke to the people I speak to then you'd know the idea is totally preposterous too.

"Anyway, the ruling elites are not the same as "the rich". Corporate executives and investment bankers do not mainly concern themselves with molding the minds of the masses. Mencius Moldbug (half-Jewish)points out that the core of "The Cathedral" is made up of senior federal civil service, federal judiciary, big media and Harvard."

I'm not sugesting any rich person wants to change anyones opinion for anything other than getting them to vote in the "right" guy. The rich don't give a shit about the drones. They simply employ a PR group to engage with the great unwashed. They don't get involved in the day to day decisions. They simply say to the PR people "get Obama elected, he's our man".The immigration thing facilitates the further generation of wealth for the rich. Many rich actively encourage immigration. They don't get together and plot anything they simply tell their PR guy to pay the politicians a visit. Many independent visits with many independent donations equals mass friggin immigration.I do think people like Soros deserve a mention as he has an agenda which all people on here would consider nefarious. However, he only deserves a mention because he has a heck of a lot of money and he is very politically active. I have a story about stuff he was trying to do in Russia. I know a guy who was working for his company in Russia. Putin's men paid him a visit and he butted out of Russia, for the moment.

Reg the Hedge. What you say is largely correct but where does it address the central issue, namley, given that the Jews were largely to blame for the current situation, can an alliance of sorts be contrived with, presumably, the non-wealthy ones.

Savant , you have published as good a piece of expository writing on the topic of the tribesman riddle that could be expected at this late date of economic and social decline of our Western society. The thing is, have you written enough for a single meal or a conscientious movement? After the unattenuated hypothesis is there enough meat left on the bone for a workable conclusion?

My personal observations of the Black Power cohort of the Negro race parallels my observation of the J-'s deepest fears. Just as the radical blacks feared that whites were actively working to fasten the slave chains and push them back to the cotton fields, likewise the hysterical J-s believe pogroms and death camps may re-emerge at a moments notice. As you pointed out, their philosophical and religious leaders have promoted this paranoid point of view. The blacks were not as effectual except for entrenching AA and the perpetual welfare state in their favor.

You propose that we seek common ground with less influential Jews with the caveat "it couldn't hurt". Well o.k., probably not.

We are experiencing the steady and certain economic destruction of our Western economies...there really is no escape.

We will emerge in a world less prosperous, less peaceful but ultimately less controlled by our elitist masters...the best we can hope for in our lifetimes.

Why should a frenchman tell the irish how to run their country ,no one will allow that ,but when the jews interfere in every possible way any mention of their evil deeds is seen as anti semitic and a MENTAL DISORDER ,lets get real here ! People have every right to speak up ,the jews are not beyond criticism .Why are people not allowed to ask legitimate questions regarding the holocaust in certain countries ,the answer is clear ,its to protect the usual suspects . There exist very good reasons for people to have negative feelings regarding the jews ,and they existed two thousand years ago .Lack of transparent and honest criticism of the jews will lead to another holocaust . The banking crisis ,the meddling in the affairs of the usa and the evidence regarding their involvement in 9/11 to name but a few are things that will make the ordinary person question the role of the jews .Not questioning what these people are up too and not trying to understand their role in the decline of the west would be a mental disorder .

Awesome post, Savant! I am a lifelong Judeophile, and you are right to draw distinction between the elites' agenda and ordinary people. Note also that Israel too is inundated with PC propaganda, thus hamstringing their constant war for survival with Islam (also one of our biggest enemies, since medieval times). Well done, sir!

Most of you just dont get it about the jew.The jew is the anti-Christ. They brag about it in their Talmud, along with the utmost rasism against the goyim.The jew has been ejected from EVERY nation theyve ever been in. This is not coinsidince.As far as trying to befriend the jew, LOL. Goodluck on that one.They dont care about the gentile, they care only for themselves.

Their is the jew mantra:Oy vey, if its good for the jews.

This is their main concearn, if its good for the jews.

I dont think many here understand the gravity of destruction handed out by the jew elite (hofjuden).

Savant failed to mention the financial system as well.Rothchilds ect.

I cant go into it all. Id have to write a book. Anyone intrested should read Henry Ford's "the internation jew"and a thousand other books written.

Anyone familiar with Rush Linbaugh, read this below link. Its a sarcastic article mocking his shabbos goy ways. Very funny and infomative.

http://incogman.net/12/2010/rush-limbaugh-spills-the-beans/

Here is a few Quotes from jews:

“We should turn Her (Russia) into a desert populated with white Niggers. We will impose upon them such a tyranny that was never dreamt by the most hideous despots of the East. The peculiar trait of that tyranny is that it will be enacted from the left rather than the right and it will be red rather than white in color.”– Leon Trotsky (born Lev Davidovich Bronstein — Zionist Jew and leading butcher of the Bolshevik Revolution. Later, after breaking with Stalin, he planned the gradual subversion, degradation and overthrow of American bourgeois society from his stronghold in Mexico until the day in 1940 when Ramon Mercader put an ice pick through his skull).

“The Revolution won’t happen with guns, rather it will happen incrementally, year by year, generation by generation. We will gradually infiltrate their educational institutions and their political offices, transforming them slowly into Marxist entities as we move towards universal egalitarianism.”— Max Horkheimer, Marxist Jew of the Frankfurt School

And there is a clear objective being played out in our time. Make no mistake about it. These bankers that run OUR economies will never release the strangle hold over us.They fund wars (both sided usually) Influence foreign policy (Iraq and Afgan wars)Open borders, control anti White media.

If any jew commenters here want to call me an anti semite, feel free. I doubt your even a semite.

Modern day movers and shakers who call themselves jews are not even semetic. Askenasi and Khazar jews have no blood line to Abraham.

In fact, in Israel, the Khazars and Askensi jews are even pushing out the Sepherdic jews(semites)

Thieves, every last one of them.

Its funny to me and very telling. The oldest religion in modern times and they still have no nation of their own.

One good thing history proves, jews always plunder and destroy nations and then fall HARD.

Another quote I left here sometime back in the red neck thread along with numberous links of jewish ownership of the declining American state of affairs.

“The Jews are not nearly so clever as many seem to think. They dig their own pit and fall into it without being pushed. And when they are in it they shriek for help from the same people for whom they dug the pit. And, when they are rescued, they began immediately to dig another.” – Donald Day in Onward Christian Soldiers

It really is just a matter of time before mass awakening occurs and jews will be, once again, in peril.And to all the moderate jews reading, your tribe is leading you off the cliff!!

The real question is that if before Jews did anything to us, we were nationalistic and all that, how the heck did the Jews get to a position of controlling us? This is why this whole the Jews did it doesn't make any sense.

The real problem is us, not them. Universal brotherhood, egalitarianism, tabula rasa, the noble savage, the inverted ethics, slave morality and so on don't come from the Jews. We came up with them by ourselves. Obviously, you can argue correctly that we got these from Christianity and Christian ethics. Obviously, you can argue that Christianity is a foreign religion to begin with. :)

Reg, you're not making sense. If I was rich, I could build factories where the wages are lower to begin with. I'd hardly care about bringing the poor in the society in which I live. This is why the whole theory that the large businesses benefit from it is amusing.

And another thing. Being a minority is irrelevant. If whites are 20% of the population and we're the sole citizens and voters, why does it matter? Especially if we'd have the control of the army and we'd be the sole gun owners.

If you think that being a minority is a problem, you're still in the universalim buzz.

And yet another thing, white nationalism is an idiocy. There are only two forms of organizing - on Kantian universal beliefs or on tribal features. With the former, you will get to include non-whites eventually(and you will have the problem of who is really white and who isn't). With the latter, it's fairly simple. I will fight my brother, me and my brother will fight our cousins and all of us will fight the world. So Germans will compete against each other, but they will be a homogeneous force against non-Germans, but they will be allies with Austria if something was to happen and so on. White nationalism comes from a false understanding of race that is American in nature.

Also, if you want to do nationalism in America, it's American nationalism. Just don't consider nonwhites American, like how things were intended to be. Since I'm at it, I always get a laugh out of tea partiers rambling about the founding fathers and then portraying MLK as a conservative. IF you want to restore the republic that the founders intended to have, only people of European descent should be citizens.

Rebel-V. asks "The real question is that if before Jews did anything to us, we were nationalistic and all that, how the heck did the Jews get to a position of controlling us? This is why this whole the Jews did it doesn't make any sense."

The answer is the same reason why whites took over Africa even with tiny numbers. Superior intelligence, better organisation etc. In fact IS refers to this in his post.

rebelliousvanilla"Reg, you're not making sense. If I was rich, I could build factories where the wages are lower to begin with. I'd hardly care about bringing the poor in the society in which I live. This is why the whole theory that the large businesses benefit from it is amusing."

If you were right I'd accept your condescendence. Since you are not (but you think you are) I'll state a few things which are obvious for all here except it would seem you.

In the past rich people didn't build factories in cheap locals because they were likely to loose their investment. I'll mention a few ways just for you. 1) The government acts like a gangster and demands payment for protection.2) Uneducated workforce who can barely drive a donkey and cart.3) Unreliable political climate, civil war, marauding mobs buring things etc.4) Unfriendly government who would not allow foreigners set up companies in their countries where they would be nervous of foreign influences on their populace.

Today China, India, Malaysia, Indonesia and many others are investment class economies. In the past they were not.

I've read your posts on here and you could do with some humility. It will allow you to learn. People who think they are always right are at a stand still. They never progress. If you have a reasonable comment on something I've posted I will address it to the best of my ability and I won't sneer at you or anyone else.

Heraclitus,For clients...If I asked such a question I would be leaving myself open to be burned at the stake. It would be extremely inappropriate to broach such a subject.

For minority (Joo + all others) co workers....To guess from the people I speak to whether they would entertain getting together to remove Muslims and others from Europe... I would have to say you couldn't get to the point where you could talk about those things with any minority. They would naturally question where the line is drawn. It is better to keep well away from that until the time is right. I would have to say none or mentally ill ones would agree the rest would be horrified.

European co workers.....It might surprise you to know I have discussed those matters with most people who I would consider my work friends. I have only ever had one negative response. When I say negative I mean "Oh God yes, I think the multiculturalism thing is great isn't it?" type of response. This was from some air headed Irish girl in London. I never spoke to her (more than a few words) again after that. All others I spoke to were/are against multiculturalism. Some were vociferously against and expressed themselves once they knew my position.

According to you, somehow my thoughts have led to the holocaust. The old one. Or a new one. Or both. I forget. Reading your post was confusing. Or the writing was confused. Whatever.

You appear to hold the opinion that all the bad things that happened to the Jewish people had nothing AT ALL to do with their own behaviour.

Then ask yourself: Why isn't there a 2000 year history of anti-Greek progroms and holocausts? After all, the Greek diaspora is rather numerous. What about the Dutch? You'll find Dutch traders everwhere in the world. For some reason they never manage to make themselves thoroughly hated and despised.

Im certainly not saying that "All joos are bad and deserve to die". I was merely remarking that they seemingly lack the capacity to oust bad elements from their communities. Instead they circle the wagons. Every time.

Granted, there are outliers like Breitbart and Michael Savage (whose show I occasionally enjoy).

Still, jews in general (I'd say 90%) are compulsively shooting themselves in the foot by not denouncing the likes of Ben Bernanke, Dominque Strauss-Kahn, the merry Millibands, Mike Wise or Maurice Dees from the dreaded SPLC. Thus, Jews give the goyim an impression of semitic complicity.

Be assured: I'd rather have it that they did not. But they do.

In a perfect world, Jews would handle the worst elements amongst them in the same fashion Catholics are dealing with paedophile priests: Publicly point the finger at them and say "Go die in the mud!"

Alas, the world is imperfect and I fear that the gulf between us and them is not shrinking, but in fact widening.

P.S.: Thanks Savant for igniting this lively discussion. It is precisely this kind of thing that makes the internet all I had hoped it would be.

I'll give credit here for your raising this issue in an intelligent manner.

Thing is, Jews are, what, 2% of the population? And radical Jews even less than that. If 2% of the population can have such an impact, then what is everyone else doing? Watching television?

The question which I raise -- and never can get much of an answer to -- is this: let us assume that "The Jews" have created the ideologies, front groups, media, and so forth which are bringing down the West. Then why have there been no countervailing forces? Why has the opposition been so ineffective? Consider how throughout much of the 20th century, what today is called "race realism" was the dominating ideology in much of the USA and Europe. In the American South, race realism was entrenched in the government, universities, business, and so forth. Why -- and this is critical -- did they fail to create their own political organizations, media, front groups, and so forth to counter the tide?

Just to give one example, why can't race realist lawyers, today, form a legal organization akin to the ACLU to bring suits against affirmative action?

Consider how western and central Europe, which was pretty much ethnically cleansed of Jews during the years 1933-45, has become PC; and how a Norse country like Sweden, which has virtually no Jews, has been the homeland to multicultism.

There is more going on here.

Getting to the meat: What do we mean by ‘Jews’?

This is the critical question.

I'd point out that "The Catholics" and "The Protestants" support mass illegal immigration into the United States: the Catholic Church in America sets up sanctuaries and provides a lot of the ideological muscle; various Protestant denominations openly import third world children to be adopted. And so forth.

The problem can not be simply laid upon "The Jews." It is one which is more widespread among elites in the West. They are displacing their own core populations and replacing them with a malleable, cultureless underclass.

anon 18.21 - I dodn't delete any comment apart from one which was nothing but a litany foul language and name calling. If that's what I deleted, then too bad. However, a number were classified as Spam by Google and I've posted them under the ananymous tag.

If yours didn't fall into either category I'd be interested to know why it didn't reach me.

Californian: I think I at least partially answered your point here "We racially conscious gentiles must accept that we are not innocent victims cruelly deceived and exploited by alien masters. Rather, the transformations that I, for one, so bitterly resent took place in our own countries, controlled by our own people, and we must accept responsibility for them."

There is a fundamental difference in natures between the races. The difference in temperament between a German Shepard and a Bijon Frese is analogous to the difference between an Irish man and an African. Or a China man and S. American.

More nuanced examples can be found in Europe itself. What with the French fighting the Germans and the Italians fighting the French, the question is why? Is there a difference between the two peoples that is more than geographical or linguistic? I say yes, and if you take a trip around Europe you see a world of difference between a Swede and an Italian or Spaniard and a German or even an Irishman and an Englishman.

So what about the Ashkenazi? Is there a innate difference between us and them much like the difference between different breeds of dogs? I think so. And thats why I'm not optimistic about combining forces with Jewish elements in pursuit of joint interests, because theirs is a zero-sum game of winners and losers and you nailed it when you said that WE are the only real threat to their interests.

We are VERY different from Jews in both temperament and cognitive method (for lack of a better word). Jews favor relativity and white gentiles favor cause and effect. Jews manipulate the chinks in this dynamic, namely the in-ability to use our process of reason to answer ALL of lifes mysteries using reason, to inject doubt into the process itself and have everyone chasing their tails, while they are completely aware of the charade.

They have mastered the process of sophistry where we are relying on an out-dated process of Socratic method trying to plumb lifes truths and turning the universes mysteries into our own masteries. Jews by and large laugh and ridicule this pursuit as being hopelessly futile where as we pursue it in spite of its futility and make some progress none the less.

I leave you with this Yiddish quote to demonstrate our relative differences and strengths "May you fear the hands of the gentiles and the tongues of Jews". Jews master the intellectual, abstract world of the mind and white gentiles are more in tune with the physical world.

@Anon 18.40. Aha, clearly you are already making hay while the sun shines and seemingly enjoying your confusion. LOL. Just don't try to drag us along with you please. In your comment you utterly undermined the efforts of Jews that were standing up to liberal/leftist/communist Jews and had the audacity to state categorically that there were no Jews that would ever become our allies. There already are cases like that! I mentioned a whole list in my previous comment under this post. Some of those people have sacrificed more for white culture in one day than I could sacrifice in a lifetime.

The Holocaust developed out of German envy. Here in South Africa whites are experiencing the exact same thing, only we are on the receiving end of the black race's envy. We are almost certainly facing genocide in the near future and violence has already become deeply entrenched in the society. Don't believe me? Visit the UN's Genocide Watch website. (With reference to your comment, "You'll find Dutch traders everywhere in the world. For some reason they never manage to make themselves thoroughly hated and despised." That is another outright lie. I have Dutch ancestry and trust me, I'm hated and despised here in South Africa.) Just like you managed to lump all the Jews together as your enemies, we have been lumped together. Just like you are unwilling to find out whether there are people that are willing to become your allies, we have been denied making any kind of contribution to our black allies. We're white and no black person ever trusted a white person. So as whites our hands are tied and our fate is sealed.

You might not care about whites in South Africa, but follow the analogy through. You are presumably a white European and remember the black race represents you in this analogy. What do you think is going to happen to the black race in SA after white South Africans have been wiped out? South Africa is fast becoming just another African country. Trust me, as someone that's travelled extensively throughout Africa, we haven't reached the bottom yet and it's a it's a very, very long hard fall we're experiencing. As we fall further, blacks continue to put more blame on the whites and so the vicious cycle of the downward spiral will be concluded in death and devastation for whites AND BLACKS.

To anon 21.17's question as to why the various other diasporas (e.g. Greek) were not driven out during the last 2000 years and Jews were: Two suggestions, envy at Jewish achievements, and, in 'Christian' lands, their identification as 'Christ killers'.

As for the ragheads, I hardly need to explain their behaviour now, do i?

I have wondered why the Christian chrches proected and protect the Jews. Recently, I had an illumination. I tried to find out who put up the money to build the churches and cathedral I could not find an answer. Who puts up the cash to build houses?

Quent, we had a German minority in Romania who was richer than Romanians and Austria-Hungary pretty much oppressed Romanians to a certain extent in Transylvania, yet we didn't mind having a German king.

Oh, and we did dislike the Jews, yet we didn't dislike the Germans. The only differences are the Bolshevik way in which Jews think that the Germans didn't have and the fact that unlike Germans, Jews moved into our cities instead of building their own and started stirring crap up. Romania was fairly multi-ethnic and some people, like the Lipovans came here because we left them alone. So it's not what you're saying.

Also, this class envy non-sense didn't really come about here and people didn't mind the rich.

So envy caused the holocaust......................what utter crap!Its not Jewish acheivement that angers people but the immoral way of achieving.look at the take over of the disney empire among thousands of examples. Then see what they do with their achievements...........usually destroy the fabric of society.Bush and Blair were used by the zionist to invade Iraq ,the zionist media covered their backs.

Blair secretly assisted in the immigrant invasion "to embarres the right" really ?Honestly I support the state of Israel and the right of Jews to be Jews but they should stop using and abusing others "for the good of the jews"It is up to ordinary good Jews to speak up and conrtol their own otherwise they will have another persecution to ad to their long list of persecution. Jews have proven themselves not to be the friend of any race and the criminal element in their elite will eventually destroy Israel from both inside and out taking many good Jews with them. It is beyond doubt that the zionists sacrificed many of their own in WW2 to achieve their aim yet we constantly hear about the evil germans only .

Californian: I think I at least partially answered your point here "We racially conscious gentiles must accept that we are not innocent victims cruelly deceived and exploited by alien masters. Rather, the transformations that I, for one, so bitterly resent took place in our own countries, controlled by our own people, and we must accept responsibility for them."

True.

Anyway, again I must congratulate you for approaching this issue in an intelligent manner.

kulak - no matter what the post said, you'd have your mind made up: 'The Joos' are to blame for everything and they're all the same.

Like I said. Or not.

Spelling counts, BTW.

@NicholasD:

worst case scenario…the world becomes islamic, whites adapt, excel in their new religion, and the jews are screwed by their own guile. Remember…whites went from their own polytheism to catholicism , to protestantism, and quite possibly now, to islam. how muny muslims will there be in the world then, and how pissed off at the jews will they be?

@ Anon 12.04. So you are saying it is more likely that the Germans acted in RIGHTEOUS INDIGNATION towards the Jews by committing unspeakable crimes of violence and terror? That is what is called 'cognitive dissonance' and you seem to be suffering from a remarkable dose.

Mr. Horowitz is simply wrong when he writes of “going back to the good old American ideal” of multi-racialism. I am certain that if all the prominent Americans I have quoted could rise from their graves, they would endorse the American Renaissance view of race and nation, and would be shocked at the idea of a multi-hued America in which we are to pretend race can be made not to matter. It is American Renaissance that is faithful to the original vision of America. Walt Whitman perhaps put it most succinctly when he wrote, “[I]s not America for the Whites? And is it not better so?” Yes, it is.

Mr. Horowitz deplores the idea that “we are all prisoners of identity politics,” implying that race and ethnicity are trivial matters we must work to overcome. But if that is so, why does the home page of FrontPageMag carry a perpetual appeal for contributions to “David’s Defense of Israel Campaign”? Why Israel rather than, say, Kurdistan or Tibet or Euskadi or Chechnya? Because Mr. Horowitz is Jewish. His commitment to Israel is an expression of precisely the kind of particularist identity he would deny to me and to other racially-conscious whites. He passionately supports a self-consciously Jewish state but calls it “surrendering to the multicultural miasma” when I work to return to a self-consciously white America. He supports an explicitly ethnic identity for Israel but says Americans must not be allowed to have one.

Anecdotal evidence suggests that in fact such out-breeding with darker races is increasing in recent years.

The Jewish guy who did the most for me on a personal level was anti-white. Helped me out when I was down and out, he did, for which I will always be grateful.

Remember the guy I told you about Savant, who said that if he ever married anyone, he'd marry a Jewish woman? And how, at the time he said that, it baffled me, because he wasn't any more religious than I was? And how he said nothing -- remained, silent, literally -- to explain the mystery when I expressed my puzzlement?

Same guy.

Since then he has taken his anti-white proselytizing to heart. Today, I have to give him credit for integrity, if not for candor.

He went and married a Chinese woman, and had a child by her.

I wholly approved, and congratulated him.

Why not? He's finally happy...

And whites will not mistake his children for whites, like I mistook him.

anon 4.58 said "And to all the moderate jews reading, your tribe is leading you off the cliff!!"

I happen to think he's right. In fact I'm amazed that, in America is particular, when you look at the wars that the neocons lead us into, Iraq, Afganistan, paying billions to Israel every year - FOR WHAT! - and now the Jewish bankers reaking the system. At some stage Americans are going to wake up to this. In fact I'm amazed it hasn't happened already!

When it does it wont be pretty. That's the pit that anon 4.58 was talking about I'd say and hes right!!

@ Kulak 22.16, when you are attacking the integrity of a person's ideology it's appropriate to quote from the person that you are attacking. Exerpts from the article by David Horowitz that you linked to via Jared Taylor's ariticle include -

"..Taylor is a very smart and gutsy individualist, but he is also a man who has surrendered to the multicultural miasma that has overtaken this nation.... What I mean by “surrendering” is that Taylor has accepted the idea that the multiculturalists have won... If there is going to be Black History Month and Chicano Studies then THERE SHOULD BE A WHITE HISTORY MONTH AND WHITE STUDIES. If blacks and Mexicans are going to regard each other as brothers and the rest of us as “Anglos,” THEN WHITES SHOULD REGARD EACH OTHER AS BROTHERS... Within the multicultural framework set by the dominant liberalism in our civic culture, TAYLOR'S CLAIM TO A WHITE PLACE AT THE DIVERSITY TABLE CERTAINLY MAKES SENSE... Jared Taylor is a very intelligent and principled man...I would rather fight against the multicultural behemoth.....Taylor and his Renaissance movement are no more racist in this sense than Jesse Jackson and the NAACP. In my experience of Taylor’s views...they do not represent a mean-spirited position. They are an attempt to be realistic about a fate that seems to have befallen us...But Jared Taylor is no more “racist” in this sense than any university Afro-centrist or virtually any black pundit of the left. He is not even racist in the sense that Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are racist."

David Horowitz is hardly a man that is anti-white! Did you even bother to read his article? When he said we were "all prisoners of identity politics" he said it in the context of Jared Taylor's "attempt to be realistic about a fate that seems to have befallen us."

Sorry but your anti-semitism has just been highlighted beautifully with your dumb reference. You wouldn't care to do a search on David Horowitz's site on 'multiculturalism' because you wouldn't want to get exposed to anything Jewish but I recommend it to anyone that's interested in the truth about David Horowitz. Here is the site -

Octapussy, I want Americanism destroyed along with every single person that organizes his life on Kantian beliefs. I'm not a huge fan of America. But the Kantian non-sense wasn't really pure in America considering that it pretty much excluded nonwhites.

I'm not a Wilders who minds outsiders only insofar as they threaten my beliefs that make me feel morally superior.

And btw, none of the Jews who you quoted has any concern for Europeans. They have a concern for a set of ideas I hardly care about. Ideas that got us in the present mess and that are pretty much anti-white to begin with.

I'm still waiting for an explanation about why did Romanians accept a German king and didn't dislike Germans, who were better off than Romanians, while Romanians disliked Jews.

And Horowitz is an idiot. Last time I checked, only people of European descent could be citizens in the US according to the laws of the generation that founded America. Where is the ideal of multi-racialism? Nowhere.

@ rebelliousvanilla, frankly I was asking because I have no idea what your point was. The irritating thing is that you just seem to like the sound of your 'voice.'

Who do you think you are to condemn the country of America??? News flash. You're nobody. And unlike Wilders, you do seem to mind outsiders that threaten your perception of your own moral superiority.

It's ironic you will stand up for Jews because they made a contribution to society, yet you won't do the same for the Americans that made a contribution to society. Do you believe that it's ok to judge people by race but it's not ok to judge people by nationality? If that were the case, using your reasoning, why bother to make an argument for the Jews in the first place, since everybody is entitled to their opinion and that means anybody is rightly in a position to take a shot at the Jews. Then you should never have commented on this post in the first place!

Unlike you, I won't presume to have all the answers. Find your own explanation about why the Romanians accepted a German king.

Savant wrote: "Thomas Sowell, in a mammoth study, ascribes part of the explanation to the fact that “Jews emerged from the ghetto with hostility toward the culture around them” and “Jewish hostility toward the culture of non-Jews has been a constant threat throughout Jewish history”

Savant, which study is that? Are you perhaps thinking of Kevin MacDonald's mammoth trilogy?

The Jewish planned attack on 911 shows the USA as the quisling puppet it is of Israel. If any other country had done this it would be nuked into the stone age.

But then we all are slaves of the Jewish banking dynasties. They will never set us free without a fight. Islam is here because of them. My friends and family murdered because of them. If they want to help, it is up to them to vocally condemn the Jewish control of central Banks, and all the stolen wealth and ownership of our media and companies that has resulted from such Money Power.

Jamie Dimon (head of JP Morgan) is Greek-American, not Jewish. I'm Jewish and very right wing. I support Israel against Islamic Jihad. Wake up (once Christian) Europe because that same Islamic Jihad is eating you up via demographic warfare

I acknowledge many of the criticisms here. Of the left wing mischief Jews get into. I hate it when the Federal Reserve chairman is Jewish. I knew Jews would get the blame for Greenspan and Bernanke policies. I cringe when I see someone trying to ruin Christmas and he has a Jewish name. I despise the oppressive ACLU Jews but not everyone there is Jewish

Ultimately this is about the survival of whites as a group , it is not about who is more intellectual etc.This is a very serious situation we find ourselves in and the Europeans will find themselves in a situation comparable to that of whites in Zimbabwe and South Africa sooner then they think, let people remember that before they want others to see how brilliant they are ......ultimately its about saving our heritage and our children.Recogize those that are sincere as opposed to those that want the limelight.

Anybody know what Kennedy was talking about in this?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JnQiE4q4Lg&feature=player_embeddedI suspect it's about the Soviet Union.

Does anybody know who Anatoliy Golitsyn is?

He was the highest ranking KGB officer to defect. Basically the KGB planed for the eventuality that a certain percentage of their people would change sides. Due to this they gave the field agents no information. This would control damage of a defection. Golitsny was different. He was not a field agent and he was privy to all the information.

In 1984 he wrote a book "New Lies For Old". In it he claimed the USSR would be collapsed by the soviets in a controlled maner. This collapse would just be a show for the west. In fact the old guard would maintain control. They decided to do this because they knew they wouldn't be able to defeat the west without also destroying themselves.Following the collapse they intended funding their people to get into government in all the countries they saw as a threat. These soviets were to collapse the western countries by destroying the nations. They would do this through mass immigration. In a nation with no cohesion, no bonding of citizens, it would be easy to defeat them as they would have no resolve. Basically it was to be a process of Balkanization.

He wrote about the fall of the Berlin wall before it happened, the multiculturalism and many other things. For me if he was just guessing I think he was too close for it to be a coincident. Look at the number of eastern europeans in the UK government. Look at France too.Michael Howard the former Tory leader, Letwin, the two Milliband brothers, Jack Straw. The numbers are extrodinary. Look at the number in the ranks of advisors and house of Lords. The same unusual numbers exist in France too. Check them out the names are easily available on the internet.

Now all the names I mentioned have something else in common besides being Eastern European. They are Joos. Imagine if there was a plot and many soviets came to the UK and France with their families, then these soviets started making moves to get into government. I suspect someone would raise an eyebrow. What better was to slip under the radar if the people were Joos. Would eyebrows be raised then. I'm guessing they wouldn't. Now I could be way off track here and in fact these Joos are just ordinary people who ended persuing a career in government. If that was the case they would need financial backing because you will not get into governemnt without money (that's a common myth). So people like George Soros gives them backing and they get the right training, the right contacts and maybe pay the right people.

Either of those routes gets them into government. It's also worth mentioning that the people listed above are some of the strongest backers of immigration. That could be part of their backers agenda or it could be down to then having sympathy for immigrants because their parents were immigrants.

OctapussyI read your posts and let me tell you my heart is ripped out when I see South African farmers and wives murdered by black savages. They are the productive salt of the earth. German farmers are the backbone of American farming. As a Jew I identify with the white race and against all black and Muslim savages. The north Asians are OK and rational but I don't like to see them taking over British Columbia and parts of our (USA) West Coast

The Mestizos of Mexico/Central America who invade us are dim bulb Injuns who will steal and take whatever they can get. In fact the only people I like are Jews, North Europeans and select South Europeans. I have no animosity to those Europeans who are whiter and more Aryan looking than me. I would not mind being one but I was born Jewish and that's OK too

Reg - sorry about the 'lost post' The best thing in future might be to draw it up in something like MS Word and save it for posterity! You can cut and paste into the blog as needs be. In answer to your earlier question, I dont know of any method within Blogger to increase the capacity of the comment field.

On further reflection, I remembered what I find so irksome about a certain, substantial subgroup of the Jewish community.

It is true that their grandfather's generation suffered horribly in Himmler's camps. But was there any need to turn that particular part of history into a guilt-Disneyland? Do the Armenians compel schoolclasses to visit a particular patch of sand in Turkey and profess guilty-guilty feelings for things that happened a century ago?

How come the genocide agoinst the Ukranians in which, incidentally, many jewish commisars were involved gets nowhere near the kind of publicity as the guys who didn't make it on Schindler's list?

Google the term "Holodomor" and find out that Jews can be mass murderers as well. Of course, you didn't hear that term in school. Wonder why?

One side note to Octapussy: Since you have taken it to yourself to play thought police in this thread, I'd like to offer you a piece of advice. Don't play the I-am-a-white-man-in-south-Africa-and-I-know-what-it-is-like-to-be-persecuted-card.

I feel for the Boers and what is happening to them. I really do. But deriving from your experience a moral superiority goes a bit too far. I never presumed to tell South Africans how to treat their Blacks. Please don't presume to teach Europeans about OUR history and to tell us how to view certain minorites in OUR countries.

That being said I would like to recommend to everyone on this thread a book called "The Holocaust Industry". It was written by a very brave man, a Jew incidentally, who described how the Holocaust is now more profitable than Disneyland.

I'm that rara avis, Irish and Jewish. I can tell you categorically that just about everyone I know would be sympathetic to what's proposed here. We all recognise that things are reaching a tipping point.

"In the 1950s, the phrase tikkun olam was used by Shlomo Bardin, the founder of the Brandeis Camp Institute (BCI). ...Bardin taught that Jews are obligated to work towards achieving a more perfect world.

Since the 1950s, other Jewish movements have adopted the use of the phrase and concept tikkun olam as a platform ...Jews are often involved in social action/volunteer projects, motivated by the concept of tikkun olam."

"As the leaders of different faith groups and denominations across the country, are gravely concerned with the current political and policy environment surrounding the issue of immigration. We are troubled by signs that our nation is turning away from reforming our nation’s immigration system and is instead pursuing enforcement policies which are ineffective and inhumane.

Enforcement raids, state and local anti-immigrant ordinances, and harmful rhetoric against immigrants are just a few of the signs that our nation is moving away from civil discourse and toward discord and division. As a result, immigrant families are being separated and immigrant and ethnic groups targeted, creating a climate of fear in all of our communities.

Now is the time to restart the debate on immigration reform and develop fair, balanced, and humane solutions to immigration. We offer the following principles to help guide our country in reaffirming our identity as a nation which welcomes immigrants and believes that the best of America is shown in how we treat those who come to our shores:

Anti-immigrant rhetoric has no place in public discourse and should not be used.

As a country, we value civil public discourse as the reasonable way to address our problems and arrive at solutions. Inflammatory statements and dehumanizing categorizations of any person or people, e.g. “illegals”, should be stricken in favor of factual and more accurate descriptions of the people adversely affected by our broken immigration system."

Can you shed som light how tikkun olam in the 1950s morphed from being a religious concept to the "most modern and broadly understood notion" of "repairing the world" through eg. fanatical support for Muslim and third world immigration to the West.

"In the 1950s, the phrase tikkun olam was used by Shlomo Bardin, the founder of the Brandeis Camp Institute (BCI). ...Bardin taught that Jews are obligated to work towards achieving a more perfect world.

Since the 1950s, other Jewish movements have adopted the use of the phrase and concept tikkun olam as a platform ...Jews are often involved in social action/volunteer projects, motivated by the concept of tikkun olam."

Can you shed som light how tikkun olam in the 1950s morphed from being a religious concept to the "most modern and broadly understood notion" of "repairing the world" through eg. fanatical support for Muslim and third world immigration to the West.

"If our buildings, our highways, and our railroads should be wrecked, we could rebuild them. If our cities should be destroyed, out of the very ruins we could erect newer and greater ones. Even if our armed might should be crushed, we could rear sons who would redeem our power. But if the blood of our White race should become corrupted and mingled with the blood of Africa, then the present greatness of the United States of America would be destroyed and all hope for civilization would be as impossible for a Negroid America as would be redemption and restoration of the Whiteman's blood which had been mixed with that of the Negro."

@Anon 21.17. If I were playing the victim card I'd hardly be standing up for another race/religion! I respect Jews because of the exposure I've had to their thinkers on the web. I will fight for anything that gives me inspiration. And if I came across as trying to teach Europeans about YOUR history (which I didn't - I know stuff all about European history) or how to view certain minorities in YOUR countries then it's because I wish you inspiration too. Heaven knows you could also do with some inspiration.

Human nature is pretty universal and it is obvious that the Holocaust developed out of human envy.

I heard David Aaranovich say casually in a panel debate: "Of course I support immigration - I am Jewish". I can think of no other people where "supporting immigration" is presented as a part of your identity. I am curious when and how this idea - that being Jewish equates support for immigration - was engineered.

In the 1950s the religious concept tikkun olam morphed into the "most modern and broadly understood notion" of "repairing the world" (through eg. fanatical support for Muslim and third world immigration to the West).

HOW - and why - was this reinterpretation of tikkun olam brought about in the 1950s? What happened?

I'm with you there Octopussy. I too find Jews inspirational. A miniscule population and yet such a towering set of accomplishments. This particular 'goy' would be very proud to be Jewish.

I might add that this is not to gainsay what IS has said in the post, but the two are nor mutually exclusive. With such towering abilities it's only natural that would lead MOST movements and intellectual innovation.

It's not hypocritical for Jews to promote multiculturalism in the U.S. while wishing to maintain Jewish ethnic dominance in Israel. Unless you think that ethnic dominance, under appropriate restraining laws, is immoral per se. it can be the foundation of a stable and successful nation.

A nation that can establish it and maintain it would be wise to do so. The U.S.A. was not able to maintain it, because too many Americans — far more than 3 per cent — came to think it violated Constitutional principles. Israel, however, was founded on different principles, and there seems to be no large popular feeling in that country for dismantling Jewish-ethnic dominance, as there was in Lyndon Johnson's America for dismantling European dominance. The Israelis, most of them, are happy with Jewish-ethnic dominance, and intend to keep it going. Good luck to them.

rebelliousvanilla said...The real question is that if before Jews did anything to us, we were nationalistic and all that, how the heck did the Jews get to a position of controlling us? This is why this whole the Jews did it doesn't make any sense.

This is really surprising comeing from an Eastern European Women.

Are you aware of the trafficing of young White girls from E. Europe to Israel to toil their lives away as prostitutes?

Do you know, per capita, Israel leads the world in both abortions and protitution?

"God's chosen people", right?

Do you know jews view Slavs as totally worthless?

Do you know of the massacre of millions of Ukrane civilians was organized by the Bolshevics, who were funded by jews?

That indeed was an amazing war vet speech. Brilliant in fact. The big fly in the ointment however was in attributing the blame to that old bugbear 'racism'. He hit all the right targets but then contextualized it under racism. Still, worth watching and remembering.

Everywhere you look you can see Jews sticking their noses and/or meddling in the affairs of white people, even telling them what songs they can sing in their schools during Christmas yet, I still see these Jews breathing, so the question is what is wrong with white people?

"It's not hypocritical for Jews to promote multiculturalism in the U.S. while wishing to maintain Jewish ethnic dominance in Israel. Unless you think that ethnic dominance, under appropriate restraining laws, is immoral per se. it can be the foundation of a stable and successful nation."

The sheer effrontery of that last statement says to me that a zionist troll lurks among us.

HYPOCRITICAL: characterized by hypocrisy; also : being a hypocrite -- insincerity by virtue of pretending to have qualities or beliefs that you do not really have

These people ... be they race, nation, tribe or religion, have been ejected (usually forcibly) from every country in the western world -- in a few rare cases, more than once. Living proof, one imagines, that there are slow learners and those who don't learn at all.

What we are dealing with is the upper crust of a race of paranoid, psychopathic subversives whose permanent state of existence is a never-ending pre-emptive strike.

And please:- "the foundation of a stable and successful nation ..."? If it weren't for the free access to technology, endless military aid and literal billions of dollars bludgeoned annually out of the west in the form of never-to-be-repaid United States aid and phoney Holocaust blackmail, Israel would be a poor cousin to the Yemen.

Israel is a false nation. It is the biggest welfare "nation" in the world, bigger than all the nigger countries in Africa combined.Israel is a corrupt, violent and very sick nation. The holoco$t is a fraud used to bilk billions of dollars from nations.During the cold war, Israel used to trade American national security sercets with the Soviets. This info led to hundreds of American spies in Russia to be tourtured and murderedIsrael is no friend to anyone. Get it out of your head if you think Isreal is an ally.

Here are excerpts from a speech made by Lavrenti Beria, the head of the NKVD, to a group of US communist students at Lenin University in 1953.

“Degradation and conquest are companions. To be conquered, a nation must be degraded … degradation can be accomplished insidiously … and effectively by consistent and continual defamation … continued and constant degradation of national leaders, national institutions, national practices and national heroes must be systematically carries out.

“By attacking the character and morals … by bringing about, through contamination of youth, a general degraded feeling, command of the populace is facilitated to a very marked degree.

The attack on the mind of a nation involves changing loyalties, we must have a command of their values. In the animal, the first loyalty is to himself. This is destroyed by demonstrating to him … showing that he does not remember, cannot act or does not trust himself.

“The second loyalty is to his family unit … this is destroyed by lessening the value of marriage, by making and easiness of divorce. The next loyalty is to his friends and local environment … this is destroyed by lowering his trust. The next is to the state …and this is the only loyalty once the State is founded as a Communist State …“By perverting the institutions of a nation and bringing about a general degradation … a population can be brought psychologically to heel…”

Good post, Moon Duster.This is what is going on now. A gradual dengration of morality.Marx was a jew and his father was a rabbi. The jew is an inborn communist. The very foundation of communism was created by jewish thinkers. Thinkers of bringing upon the very thought of zionism to bear upon the world. When you think communsim, think jew/zionism.I am surprised that so many people complian about the current state of insanity without understanding the source.

The powers that be, money changers, create situations and dilemas in our nations. This is not random that 3rd world immigration is at a furious rate.

This process of integration and assimilation is designed to lower the bar of the nations whom are infultrated with people who dont recognise a bar of soap or toilet paper.

This inturn empowers the powers to have move sway over the dumbed down masses.

Easier to control and profit from. This psycopathic mentality is in play right now. The world is filled with people whom desire a good life. Take away that desire thru subversion and you have a people that are inept and powerless.

The jews are at the front of this demoraliation. Media is their most effective weapon.

Google the "protocals of the learned elders of zion" and see it is the blue print of whats going on NOW.

Of corse the jews call it a fake, but would they admit it was real?

Read them and the paralells of immigraiton and denegration of once powerful nations are clearly planned.

Understand the amount of effort it takes to undermine Millions of people, then turn on your TV or walk down the street and see it.

He said under interrogation, I dont know why this government employs jews in areas of intel.They will always give the info over to Israel.

the Iraq war set up by dual citizens in the American Govt.Iraq posed no threat to America.They posed a threat to Israel.

the Afgan war is a pharse, military industrial profiteering.The drug trade of opiom is being funded and protected by the DEA and military.

If the drug trade in America was stopped tommorow, The economy would collapse. The leading market behind gasoline transactions is drug transactions in the US.

There is a drug deal done multiple times per second in the US.The money is spent fast and keeps the economy above water.

George Bush even admitted this. In the time of the bail outs to the thieveing jew run banks, he procliamed the reliance of the drug trade as one reason the economy was still afloat.

The whole scam of the open borders in the uS is to secure the safety of drug imports. Its big money to bankers. The other reason for open borders is the influx of the third world savages. The media promotes sympathy for them as they kill your own.

The money we all cherish is what controls our lives. The controll of money is the key.

How does a nation wage war on another nation?How do you convince young men to go kill other young men?

Who funds and oraganises wars?

Banks and media subversion.You have to see the bigger picture of whats going on. Im an American, many of you are European. Our problems are the non stop jewish destuction thru media. Make no mistake, jews own the media and control the content. The media is very decieving. As are the perveyors of said media.

The goal of the media is one of distraction and deceit, Im sure all of you know this. So connect the dots.What is their primary goal beneath all the fluff?Multi cultural, non family, no love for your race and constant, in your face confusion.

The media is the mind control apparatus to distract. The real goal is power. Dont think for a minute that these owners of banks, media outlets and governments are working in your best intrests.

They are dirty people covered in blood. The more suberversion of the masses the more they hone their expertise. And paranoia riddles their minds. Therefore YOU are the enemy of them.

The masses are the only ones who can take them DOWN and they are FULLY aware of this.

So, they use media and distraction to futher their rein.

Immigration of savages is delt out to US, to repell any organised effort to the topple system in play.

Its not random and its not an accident our nations are being flooded with third world savages.

This astonishing people, the House of Abraham—for whom, like Nietzsche, I have immense admiration---merit far more reflective exegesis than mere rancid bigotry. Thus do I wish to post this comment, if I may, on the recent item about Jews, and to commend that writer on his/her exposition of the matter; it is a relief to encounter something other than the crude, toxic, brutish and utterly unworthy irrationality deployed on so many soi-disant rightwing websites concerning this subject.

The two aspects of human kind—creativity vs. destructiveness---are possibly more sharply defined among this remarkable bunch of guys than any other, with one striking exception, the Germanic peoples, (the other goys….!).

(Parenthetically, it may be that the singular tragedy of the endlosung could lend itself to being characterised as a ghastly case of like repelling like…)

However, the reference to Jews emerging from the ghettoes with their character formed by resentment of Gentile societies, by virtue of their treatment over the preceding centuries, may be correct as far as it goes, but I would submit that it goes far deeper than this. Jews have been arousing hostility and hatred for millennia, not centuries; thus do we need to push our elucidation of matters correspondingly very much further back.

If I might wheel into the spotlight one Jacob Burckhardt, a history professor from Basel, Switzerland; his thesis being that the origin of the Jews may be deduced from a reading of the Vedas, of the Laws of Manu in particular. As everyone knows the strictures therein are in fact a far reaching blueprint for the elevation of the human animal, by raising up not one but four noble races, by means of religious and cultural observances and strictures. (The fossilised and jejune remnants of this grand design are what the British found in India millennia later and which we have come to know as the caste system……….).

Of course the creation of a beautiful garden necessarily involves the purification of the soil and the burning of the garbage, and the converse of this programme necessarily involved the extirpation, often by frightful measures, of everything base and poisonous. A de facto upside down OUTcaste system came by default into being, right at the bottom of which were the outcasts among the outcasts, people of whom one did not even speak. These were called, in Sanskrit, the Chandala, and these were the origin of the Jews. Now, understand please that this was not done to the Chandala caste because they were Jews---there was no such thing as a Jew back then---but rather that this regimen eventually evoked a world outlook among the Chandala which we would come to know as Judaism, to bloom ages after into our history, burnished and authoritative in the hands of a stiff necked bunch of guys who, with astounding chutzpah, would rewrite the whole history of the ancient world in the form of a family history of a single extended tribe. All the ingredients are there; we find; the gods of the ancient world are morphed into demons; a new God comes over the horizon, offering a cosmic vengeance on behalf of the people now Chosen, (conditional upon their unswerving loyalty to Him and to no other; the birth of monotheism…), all the older ethics--Good and Bad—are now opposed by, respectively, Evil and Good, in what amounts to a world-significant inversion of morality.

Looking back, one sees the collapse over time of the vast project of Manu recorded in metaphorical, allegorical form in the narrative about the Tower of Babel, which may be a pointer in addition to the beginning of volkewanderung, the real one; looking forward one sees the Jewish instinct give rise to Judaism of the freer confession, aka Christianity; in due course its secularisation, by the lights of a perverted social science, into what we call Scientific Socialism(sic), courtesy of that grand Old Testament Rabbi Karl Marx, bequeathing its himalaya of corpses to history; and to where next?

Where next?

The ancient Jewish instinct, that world view by which they are defined, was formed so long ago that it is virtually part of their DNA---and it is a cosmic yearning for vengeance upon what it calls the World, the Flesh, and the Devil.

Now look at them again; are there any people anywhere, numerically so little, who have exhibited so much brilliance, energy, creativity, passion, fire, sheer proficiency……?

You will find both these aspects, in spades, among this wonderful, terrible tragic people; you will like as not encounter them both in one man.

Jews---Zion; Israel;---stand today where they have always stood. They stand at the Janus gate, at the tipping point of history and destiny; and whichever way they go they will likely take us all with them. That is where next.

@rightwingnutancient vedic (aryan) religion to the present day is monotheistic despite the appearance that it is not ,same with pagan religions.The idea of sanathana dharma is the real vedic religion and the base of white culture and as such will not always defy corruption .The power of talmudic judaism is bound to fail and is surely the main evil in the kali yuga.But eventually bhudi will triumph and the varna system as a natural system of organising society will triumph too.The seeds of logic and realism is contained within all religions and will grow again neither heaven nor hell or even the all powerfull jews can stop that.Sathya yuga is next !

“Christmas Eve is one of the few occasions when Hasidim refrain from Torah (Talmud) study, do not conduct weddings or go to the mikveh (ritual bath). But they do play chess and work on their bills. On Christmas Eve, known in Jewish circles as Nitel Night, the klipot are in total control. The klipot are parasitical evil forces that attach themselves to the forces of good.

"According to Kabbala, on the night on which ‘that man’ — a Judaic euphemism for Jesus — was born, not even a trace of holiness is present and the klipot exploit every act of holiness for their own purposes.

"For this reason, Nitel Night, from nightfall to midnight, is one of the few occasions when Hasidim refrain from Torah (Talmud) study. On this horrific night, they neither conduct weddings nor do they go to the mikveh. An entire folkloric literature has developed around the unusual recreational activities of Nitel Night. The customs, it should be emphasized, are practiced only by Hasidim...

"The Knesset correspondent of the ultra-Orthodox newspaper Hamodia, Zvi Rosen, relates that celebrated Hasidic admorim (sect leaders) would cut a year’s supply of toilet paper for Sabbath use (to avoid tearing toilet paper on Sabbath) on this night (Christmas Eve).

"Actually, this disrespectful act has profound kabbalistic significance, because Kabbalistic literature extensively discusses Christianity as waste material excreted from the body of the Jewish people....”

The preceding information is excerpted from the book Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit

I liked your idea about the new races not being of as much use to the jew as we are. It couldn't get any better than this for them!But they are so intoxicated with their success that they can't stop. like a dog chasing a wounded animal.No. genocide on this scale and this impersonal must be very easy for them and extremely exiting. No jews can help us.The dog couldn't stop and neither will they. We must ecsape this parasite completely

Anonymous, you just rambled. Answer to me how did the Jews got to rule the US? I mean, you let them in for one, like idiots. Gave them citizenship like idiots and treated them equally like idiots. And yes, it's their fault after that.

Anon 21.17, it's ok, we like Germans for some reason. Apparently, according to Octapussy we should envy you, but we admire certain things about you. Anyway, even the Nazi troops that were around here acted fairly well all things considered. Not that many rapes and all that, especially compared to the Russians. And why do you expect Octapussy to not feel morally superior due to him suffering? Like everything he espouses, it's so Christianity lite. The way I see it, whites in Africa are morons for giving up the apartheid and I won't really feel that bad for them, until they wake up anyway.

"Jews see themselves as semites dont they......?Is anyone asking the arabs or palestinians to join the white survival camp ? "QED. This is why besides the Jews who see themselves as European and white, I wouldn't really trust them.

Iron Man, thanks. :)

Octapussy, I said I want Americanism destroyed, not Americans. I don't care about what Americans do.

And American isn't a nationality. Being American means nothing since everyone can be American and be considered as such.

RebelliousVanilla said: The way I see it, whites in Africa are morons for giving up the apartheid and I won't really feel that bad for them, until they wake up anyway.

Yes, well I'm sure most whites in SA have awoken to the less than wonderful reality of the so-called "rainbow-nation". However, it's very easy to pontificate about matters of which you know very little, and by your admitted age, would have had no personal propaganda exposure to.

If there was one country on this earth more vilified than Israel, it must have been apartheid SA. And, unlike them, we didn't have a lobby in the USA that could conveniently ignore the international community without any concern.

Actually, I don't accept that apartheid was inherently "good", but I can't help feeling that white SA could have done a lot more to secure far more political power for themselves (maybe a predominantly white state in the Western Cape, for example?) in the post-apartheid dispensation. Your criticism has some merit in that respect.

Apartheid was ended because (a), primarily, Communism had collapsed in Eastern Europe, thus discrediting it as a viable economic and societal model; (b) economic sanctions on SA and the recalling of foreign debts especially were putting the squeeze on the country's ability to grow economically and (c) large areas of the country had become quite ungovernable (black areas).

One can add to the above a number of other, lesser factors for apartheid's demise - the mickey-mouse "liberation" organisations accounting for about 0.1 percent, within that mix.

One comment I would make concerning the jews in SA - most of them were liberal anti-apartheid types, keen to usher in the "new" SA. However, once the new SA was a reality most of them fled the country for greener pastures. I'm not anti-joo or anti-Israeli etc., but the hypocrisy of South African jewry, for the most part, is undeniable.

Miss Vanilla, not wanting to sound condescending in any way to yourself, but the fact of the matter is that most people don't have rigidly set political views for all their life. You are young (early 20's?) and until you've lived another decade or so, you won't appreciate exactly what I'm saying.

It's not that your world-view or political views will automatically change, but most of us mid 30 and older will testify to the fact that these views are generally not set in stone. Some switch from left to right, or vice-versa, while many end up going full circle (either left or right) over the course of many years.

@ Rebelliousvanilla, reading your comment gave me a laugh. I have superiority in logic, more than anything else, judging by your comments.

Whites in Africa had their backs against the wall due to the pressure that YOU put on us to implement a democracy - an utterly STUPID system. Had it not been for the pressure you put on us we may have been able to negotiate a better deal for ourselves. Thanks for having our backs, hey. The only way to go is with a meritocracy. And apartheid was positively EVIL(!) although it was sure as hell better than a democracy.

The only way that your comment is acceptable in terms of non-judgment of people (i.e. the American people) is if 'Americanism' was meant as heresy in terms of the endorsement of the separation of church and state. If that was the case then I misunderstood your comment and I apologize. However, it's been mentioned on numerous occasions during this thread that you don't express yourself very clearly and it is very difficult understanding the point of your comments. For example, if you do not endorse the separation of church and state, why do you attack Christianity in Europe in a previous comment? No, it seems that you contradict yourself in every sentence you write.

I'm done with this discussion.

B.t.w., "Christianity lite"? LOL. Your assumption that I'm Christian was prejudiced. I suspect you have a high opinion of your own open mindedness but maybe you should revisit that :)

tired old white guy, in case you didn't figure it out, nobody really gives a damn when old white guys are mad. So tough luck. I hardly see why you would comment anyway considering that I'm inheriting the broken up world that you nutjobs left behind.

Krokodil, hopefully, I will become a multiculturalist feminist and be able to get drunk and not give a shit.

Octapussy, I didn't know that Romania had a huge influence related to the end of the apartheid. Maybe you mean Americans pushing their stupid values on you, just like they did on Europe and pretty much on the whole world. If you want to blame someone for the end of colonialism and all that, the US it is.

And I hardly see the apartheid as evil. Only fools think that a group can't rule over another and that is evil. I actually see a group including outsiders in the political body as evil since that's treason. And by Americanism I mean the idiocy of universal rights, egalitarianism, civic nationality, propositional nationality. You know, the traditional progressives in European politics.

"tired old white guy, in case you didn't figure it out, nobody really gives a damn when old white guys are mad."

This is a mistake many people have made throughout history ... often their last one.

The "old white guys" of history include people like George Patton (active at 60), Robert E. Lee (54) Charles Martell (52) and his grandson Charlemagne who was fighting wars when approaching his seventies ... as well as Rodrigo Díaz de Vivar (El Cid) who died in battle at 57.

Charlemagne, Martell and El Cid, BTW, lived in eras when fifteen or twenty was considered middle aged ...

Another thing is attitude. A friend of mine once said: "Never seriously annoy an old guy. They have neither the patience nor the time for your bullshit ... it's easier for them to just smack you."

Secondly, RV, I do recommend you edit your posts as many are so convoluted or rambling, that the meaning or thrust of the post is entirely lost at the end.

@rebelliousvanilla, I think you need to chill a little bit, and stop being so defensive.

You are obviously intelligent and well-educated, clearly more so than the average 20 something female.

However, as someone said earlier on in this thread, considering your age and lack of worldly experience, you could do with a modicum of humility from time to time.

I'm not dissing your (overall) input, some of which is quite interesting and perceptive, but the person who rigidly refuses to take a backward step, and is always "right", ends up sounding like a bore.

In other words, if you're irking several people here, maybe it's your own stance that needs a little readjustment.

Like yourself, I'm very self-opinionated, but I'm also old enough (late 40's) to actually recognise it, and to admit that I'm not always right.

Younger people are naturally more idealistic (and naive). Though not guarenteed, wisdom comes with a little bit of age.

@ Rebelliousvanilla, clearly you will not be making much of the broken world you inherited when you have such a disgustingly, disrespectful attitude towards your elders.

Apart from our own part, America is not the only country to blame for our predicament. A sign of maturity is a willingness to accept one's own contribution to a problem. I won't hold my breath with you though.

"Only fools think that a group can't rule over another and that is evil." So it's as simple as that, huh? OK, now I've officially wasted my time here. Feel free to have the last word.

Lisel, why? I hate crowded places. As a woman, if my men want me to have more kids, they should move their ass and conquer more land. I don't want Europe to become India or China.

And it's farcical to accept this idea just because some fruities enjoy feeling good about themselves and allowing people of different ethnic groups to vote in the elections we have, besides letting them move in the same place.

Also, with the current idiotic retirement benefits and healthcare plans, it is impossible to have children. I already pay for the livelihood of old people, I can't maintain them, children and work less to take care of kids.

Guess what: the leaders of antibusing movement in California were Jews.

A dramatic series of events then cast a pall over Black-Jewish relations. A Jewish assemblyman and a foe of school busing, Alan Robbins, opposed Bradley for mayor in 1977. a Jewish member of the Board of Education, Howard Miller, was recalled in 1978 by a resurgent antibusing movement; its leader and eventual replacement for Miller of the school board was Roberta Weintraub. Weintraub joined with fellow Jewish antibusing activist Bobbie Fiedler on a divided board...The perception grew among Blacks that the Jewish community was turning heavily to the right. Indeed, Jews in the San Fernando Valley were much more antibusing than the Jewish leadership; one liberal Jewish activist remembered: "[W]e had 100 percent of the Jewish leaders; they had the Jewish grass roots."

To those who wish to point out "that hey, look, jews are complaining about "liberals" too" , I would suggest that you do a couple of things. First, look at what they really write. Analyse it and you will see that they MAY disagree on the method, but in the end, their opinion will only be for the good of the jew and the detriment of the white person. Also, consider the "red herring" , False flag" , and Machiavellian intrigue angle. Remember, the jew recites the kol nidre , which absolves them of any guilt for lying to or stealing from, the goy [you and I ] with their god.Remember too, Jesus Himself referred to the jewish leaders-and by extension their followers- as "sons of the devil" and sons of hell" . He stated that they were "of their father the devil, who was a liar and murderer from the beginning" , and that they did their fathers will.

We must not succumb to the siren song of Jew-hatred -- a song that the Jewish establishment wants nothing more than to have us sing because it unites their people against us and makes it just that much more difficult for us to throw off the Jewish yoke. We must stop harboring such ancient and destructive notions as that the Jews are 'evil'. And we must unite with the best of the Jews to do what is best for both of us.

There is no such thing as a giant hydra with nine heads called "the Jews." If Noam Chomsky is a Leftist moron then you criticize that, but you also support brave Israeli soldiers who risks their lives to defend their country against an evil enemy.

I don't see any problem whatsoever in doing both. The problem exists entirely in your head because you see all Jews in the entire world as one giant organism. I don't.

Although Solzhenitsyn points out that "Jewish communists participated efficiently and diligently in collectivization", he does not say they participated as Jews per se. And he adds:

"Regardless of the percentage of Jews in the party and Soviet apparatus, it would be a mistake to explain the ferocious anti-peasant plan of communism as due to Jewish participation. A Russian could have been found in the place of Yakovlev-Epstein—that’s sufficiently clear from our post-October history."

Jews first requirement for living and thriving in a host nation is to have the host unable to muster a unified opposition to the Jewish population and its goals. Remember Jews never are satisfied with just living in a nation; they always seek to control it. Jews are not like the Amish.

As long as the host nation is filled with different races and religious factions squabbling among themselves, they cannot mount an effective anti-Jewish force.

Likud MK and Australian MP discuss "humane solution" for thousands of 'Muslim infiltrators' in Israel: Send them to live down under. Talkbacks MK Danny Danon (Likud) asked Australian MP Michael Danby on Wednesday to propose, in parliament in Canberra, sending African migrants from Israel to Australia.

Danon and Danby discussed the issue during the Australian politician’s visit to Israel for the World Jewish Congress’s International Conference of Jewish Parliamentarians.

“The arrival of thousands of Muslim infiltrators to Israeli territory is a clear threat to the state’s Jewish identity,” Danon told The Jerusalem Post.

“The refugees’ place is not among us, and the initiative to transfer them to Australia is the right and just solution.

“On the one hand, it treats the refugees and migrants in a humane way. On the other hand, it does not threaten Israel’s future and our goal to maintain a clear and solid Jewish majority,” he explained.

Danon said Danby enthusiastically agreed to present the idea to the Australian Parliament.

Notice how the poor, starving "refugees" become "infiltrators" while they're in jewtopia.

We were discussing arrogance once? And why the tribe got expelled from country after country, ad nauseum?

I'll say it again, they are not that smart. Not as smart as they think they are.

I am afraid you are wrong here although your arguments are powerful. The supposed 'holocaust' of six millions jews bears heavily on the minds of nearly every single jew on the planet to the point almost of paranoia (a trait that their particular genetic heritage makes more likely anyway). You said yourself that all jews are pushed in the direction of seeing themselves as persecuted and in fact not without reason - they were kicked out of nearly every country in europe at some point in their history.

The fact is this:

All jews ultimately see themselves as a homogenous race - all decended from Abraham and the membership of this race in 99% of cases is due to GENETIC factors not cultural factors. I am afraid that the Jewish psyche is fundamentally different to the psyche of someone of a christian culture and you are naive if you believe otherwise. Jews do well in christian societies because they can take advantage of the honesty of the christian culture. They don't do so well in other cultures at all and this is their downfall. It is the concept of an eye for an eye and being a chosen RACE by god that makes them so different to us.

You would do well to read again the book of the 1920's on international Jewry sponsored by Henry Ford - not much has changed since then.

Unfortunately the international Jewish banking conglomerate has grown too powerful for us to take them on. First this must be destroyed somehow. Then the communities of Europe can be free from slavery to the Jew and Israel.

Thanks Dr. E. I'm sure what you say is true, but I suppose the main point I'm making is that not all Jews, or maybe not even a large majority, possess the characteristics you describe. Maybe they do and maybe I'm wrong. But I see lots and lots of Jewish input which supports our cause.

A new euphemism for Black criminals appears to be “urban youth.”The public is already rolling their eyes at Zogmedia’s “youth” euphemism. The over-generality and whitewash purpose of that word has already grown absurd. They now throw a small concession to Whites by saying “urban youth.” It contains some kind of winking reality designator. It was gonna get old fast for Whites to have to redefine the their nice word “youth” as “people who riot, steel, and commit mayhem.”

That seems to be “the law” now on Judenmedia whenever reporting crimes by blacks.Having blacks or non-Whites give the report serves two psychological purposes against Whites:

1) It keeps an “us/them” feeling from forming in the audience.

2) The dark reporters automatically have a role of “good guys” on “our side.” The subliminal message is: “Some dark people are bad, many are good.”3) Another subliminal is: “Everything’s O.K., look, the dark people are policing the other dark people.”

Everything you see on T.V. is involves psychological mind management to keep White people confused and scattered

@irishsavant To be honest, I haven't read so much shit in a long while.

FFS haven't you heard of such a thing as the World Order or the New World Order? Of course the jews are destroying all forms of nationalism. The goal is a One world Govt, ruled by Talmudic jew bankers, depopulation on a massive scale, and the abolishion of currency. We will all be microchiped. We will all be slaves to the Satanic Talmudic jews. It's that straightforward, it's that transparent. There is a jew conspiracy lead by the Rothschilds, yes the Illuminati does exist, yes, jew bankers did 9/11, yes the control of the money supply is the engine behind it all, yes the Freemasons are involved as well, yes, the protocols of zion are exactly what they purport to be, yes they use the false dialect to control world events, yes the Rothschild backed Bolsheviks murdered 50+ million Christians, and yes they do tell lies and yes they do f**kin hate us because the Talmud tells them to.

Robert of Belfast - I agree with most of what you say, although I don't know how you can quite so definitive. Leaving that aside, the purpose of that long post was to make the case that not all Jews, maybe not even a majority, are involved in or even know about, such nefarious activities.

I believe your mistake, and that of so many posters to this string, lies in assuming that all Jews subscribe to these objectives. If that's true, which it surely is, as I tried to demonstrate in the post, we're better off trying to work with them, or at a very minimum, not drive them into the enemy camp.

We are faced with the dilemma of continuing to tell the truth about Jews, thereby repulsing the brainwashed Euro masses we are trying to attract. On the other hand, by abandoning anti-Semitism and replacing it with a Jew friendly approach seems on the surface like a sound strategy. But it is built on a foundation of deception. Jews will see right through it in a Jew York minute.

Many other have tried this.How much success have they had? Again, it seems to me Jewish supremacists would never make the mistake of joining what all of them see as their enemy (WN). They are much smarter than that.

Savant - by the very fact you see the need to recruit them shows you realize that they are really the cause of our dispossession.

Another component is just as our base is presently undermined into uncertainty, thus made ineffective; we could similarly guard against making Jews rabidly anti-white as they've done in the past. If they're neutral towards us, that's better than their being hostile.

There are plenty of other groups that are actually anti-Semitic, yet Jews are obsessed with attacking whites who are not... Ah, well.

"Our race is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different﻿ from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves." - Menachem Begin

@ShaunantijihadAshkenazi Jews AREN'T WHITE. Ed Miliband looks more like a Paki than a whiteman. They often have big rubber lips and jewfros like blacks and hooked noses like Arabs. That must be why they side with them against whites. They must have some negro in them. Interbreeding with whites, only makes some of them look white. They hate whites and can't be trusted. Sorry.

And does being Shaun Anti-Jihad mean accepting tens of thousands of Nigerian Igbo Christians eh, Mr Anti-Jihad. I can't ever imagine the likes of Ed Miliband ever being pro-white. He is THE ENEMY. His sort should be hanging from the nearest lamp post.

Speaking of Tribes I am having a very interesting discussion here, and wondered if you would like to link up with it and tell me what you think. My idea is simply to accept Khazar Jews as Whites and get them onside where they support White rights. As simple as that really:

http://unamusementpark.com/2011/09/oh-stormfront/#comments

Shaun, I cannot agree. I too pop into "Unamusement Park" regularly, and, agree wholeheartedly with his musings ... just as I agree with Gilad Atzmon:-

But they are a drop in the ocean and are completely overwhelmed by the reeking sea of insane zionists who want us utterly destroyed at worst, or ignorant, trembling serfs at best.

The jews have fucked people over for so many generations and have, in turn, been hounded out of their ghettoes so often that hatred, fear and distrust of whites is hard-wired into the majority of them. It's become race-memory.

There is a reason they have been violently expelled from over a hundred countries and states in the last two milennia ... often physically thrown out at spear- arrow- and gunpoint. Literally told that they would be huinted down and executed if they returned.

Didn't stop 'em. Look at France. They are now running the show. And england. And the US ...

I have a jewish friend who is a star, but her sister is a raving fucking loony. Anything approaching criticism brings on a shrieking hysterical attack in which everyone hates her and wants her dead or gone. In normal people this would mean a trip to the shrink, but to a large minority of jews this paranoia is quite normal.

Remember also, that jews are like third worlders ... they love drama. But their inborn instability often turns the theatre into reality ... for them, anyway.

So, short version, Shaun ... ain't gonna happen. They only way it could is if the ordinary jews rein in the paranoid lunatics in their ranks. But the paranoid loonies are the ones that scrabble to the top of the heap and they are running the show, so ... once again, ain't gonna happen.

Think I'm being unfair? Read a few of the less complimentary statements by say, Benyamin Netenyahu and the chief rabbi's on us YTs in the grand scheme of things.

Anonymous said...“@ShaunantijihadAshkenazi Jews AREN'T WHITE. Ed Miliband looks more like a Paki than a whiteman. They often have big rubber lips and jewfros like blacks and hooked noses like Arabs. That must be why they side with them against whites. They must have some negro in them. Interbreeding with whites, only makes some of them look white. They hate whites and can't be trusted. Sorry.

And does being Shaun Anti-Jihad mean accepting tens of thousands of Nigerian Igbo Christians eh, Mr Anti-Jihad. I can't ever imagine the likes of Ed Miliband ever being pro-white. He is THE ENEMY. His sort should be hanging from the nearest lamp post.”

Anonymous 9 September 2011 17:59

Your views are not only at odds with reality but make the case for white rights distasteful to the general public, and is a main obstacle to our view being widely accepted. Consider this:

Delusion: “Ashkenazi Jews AREN'T WHITE. Ed Miliband looks more like a Paki than a whiteman. They often have big rubber lips and jewfros like blacks and hooked noses like Arabs.”

Reality: They have mixed genetics, some people, like Hitler, have just a single Jewish grandparent. Some of them look like Natalie Portman.

Delusion: That must be why they side with them against whites.

Reality: All of them? That is an incorrect generalisation. Hitler had Jewish Generals. The blogger I quoted, http://unamusementpark.com/, as well as the blogger Lawrence Auster at http://amnation.com/vfr/ identify themselves as white with some Khazar ancestry and support white rights. And Muslims must murder all Jews worldwide to bring the last Imam in their insane ideology, so Jews will not support them against whites once they understand the reality of Islam.

Delusion: They must have some negro in them. Interbreeding with whites, only makes some of them look white.

Reality: They look Negro and look white? How do they manage that! My, they really are accomplished! But yes, constant interbreeding with whites would make them not only look white externally, but in every other way as well. It’s called genetics.

Delusion: They hate whites and can't be trusted. Sorry.

Reality: Again, all of them? How could you know? And many of “them” are only partially Khazarian and mostly white. I accept your apology, for you do need to apologise.

Delusion: I can't ever imagine the likes of Ed Miliband ever being pro-white. He is THE ENEMY. His sort should be hanging from the nearest lamp post.”

Reality: He married (or intends to marry) a white girl called Justine Thornton. So I guess that is at least one white he doesn’t hate. But he sure doesn’t have much choice about being your enemy, whether he wants to or not, does he? In reality, like all Labour leaders, he has committed High Treason by transferring our sovereignty to the EU. But that is not necessarily because he is of immigrant stock or is a Khazar, though I accept it as a possibility. It is more likely because he subscribes to the ideology of the Marxist New World Order, as do many whites, like Blair and Brown before him. If we use this false line of reasoning we get this syllogism. Miliband is a Traitor. Miliband is a Khazar. Therefore all Khazars are Traitors. But then we also get this: Blair is a Traitor. Blair is English. Therefore all English are Traitors.

Delusion: That your view will ever get the support of the general public.

Reality: We need the support of the traditional Conservative voters, who will never vote for someone with your viewpoint, before we are sunk by the nation-destroying, mass-immigration of Muslims and Negroes by the acolytes of the New World Order. And that means simply accepting that you do not have the right to drag some poor bastard out of their bed at 5am and hang them from the nearest lamppost because their grandfather was allegedly Jewish. Do you accept that you do not have that right? Do you?

The dangers are essentially:

1. Marxism/Communism – Those following this ideology are a cancer upon the nation.

2. Negro and Muslim immigration and breeding – These are the result of the above, but ordinary white people must be made to understand that their offspring will be destroyed by either the Negro genome in our gene pool and/or Islam. But we should remember that they were invited by the Marxists using our taxes, and that those who have not committed crimes should be treated as decently as is affordable and reasonable when we send them and their broods away.

3. You. You and those who continue to hold your viewpoint are holding us back. To be blunt, you are poisoning the well with unreasonable hatred.

We do not have the luxury of time Anon, and just as Irish and English have settled their differences and get on together, it is my opinion that settling the so called Jewish question by simply accepting those who wish to be accepted, and who support white homelands, should be accepted, because doing so will help the average Conservative voter to view the right and the necessity for white homelands more favourably.

Great Posts ShaunAntiJihad. Take it from me that there's a gigantic spectrum of views among Jews and while the majority do have fears of ultra-white Christians, they DO NOT hate all whites, or anything even close to it.

As regards looks, most Ashkenazi Jews are as white as anyone else in their community.

Sean, since Walter Williams and Thomas Sowell are black, black immigration isn't a problem. Nice reasoning there! And your syllogisms are just as bad. I suggest you give up the whole logic teacher act because it isn't working for you. :)

Antisemitism is a disease, it's carried by Jews. Jews have no intention of putting your ethnic interests above or even on par with theirs, without Jews "White rights" would be simply known as "rights", we'd still be living in our own homelands by the rules of our own cultures. They engineered the destruction of whites in the first place. The only thing that would make Jews PRETEND to support "white rights" is if the day comes that they think pretending so will be "good for the Jews", the standard they judge everything on. Only if they feel they are under physical threat, that their victims will violently backlash at their attempted genocide, will they back down. Mere economics won't do it, their hatred for non-Jews is too intense - look at their activities in South Africa. They've been this way for thousands of years and they won't change in the next thousand.

Your suggestion is already being tried on a massive scale by Conservatives like the Republican Party and Glenn Beck, how's that working out for them? Have the Jews backed off one iota from sponsoring genocide against the Repub's constituents, even after the Republicans launched wars for them? You just can't get more obsequious than a Beck or Bachmann, what is the Jews reaction to them? They hate their guts. Your Idea isn't new, it has been done to death and it is a failure.

@jerry and others. You miss the central point. Namely that it might be a good idea not to designate all Jews as evil white Christian haters. It is a demonstrable fact that very many Jews support WN causes, and no, they are not 'spies in the camp' So that's all I'll add - address the point that the poster makes.