I think it's time we acknowledge that robofuckers are not able to be categorized on a binary 'robot to 'not robot' scale, and that instead there are distinct, often overlapping groups of robofuckers, separated by preferences within that community

And moreover, that grading those different communities based on how 'robot' the objects of their affection are is futile, especially if you're doing so based on the appearance of said robots

For example;Conventionally attractive women but with panels (2B, GitS, aesthetic art)Androids with human-like movement and behavior, but distinctly mechanical appearance (Ultron, Destiny characters)Androids, but with distinctly mechanical behavior. Often faceless as well (the Lost in Space robot, idk)Drones (arguably a sub-kink, since drones are almost universally a self-insert thing that involves a personality contrast)

Also; Transformers, non-humanoid robots, robots that are literally just machine arms or w/ever

These categorizations aren't new, but what I would suggest is that the obvious scale of human to not-human doesn't hold true when you look a little closer at how these communities approach the humanity / lack thereof of the robots they're interested in

Plenty of people who're into 'women with panels' do create and interact with content that really gets into the robotic nature of the robots in question; i.e. mech gore stuff, mind control via technology, etc. To contrast, a lot of Transformers-y porn doesn't even necessarily get into the robotic /nature/ of the characters it's using, beyond the basic physicality. Just because a character looks like a robot doesn't necessarily mean they're treated like one