2,500 Ground Zero workers have cancer

What are you babbling about? And why? Go read the Jeff Prager material and the USGS dust evidence.

As far as Judy Wood goes, she 'implied' lots of things including some imaginary space based weapons, then went off on a ramble about 'wheat chex'
and 'poofs' and such. She seems to delight in vagueness coupled with a Saturday afternoon cartoon version of descriptions.

I did read the USGS dust samples can you please point out to me where it says anything about radioactive daughter products maybe I missed it. She
never implied space based weapons. She's actually clearly stated many of times she does not think it was a space based weapon. And the terminology
she uses is actually more scientific she's applying different descriptive terminology for unknown occurrence. You know saying smoke implies fire
saying puff is just a disruptive way of saying evidence No. 13514. Like I said Im not saying she's right but don't miss represent some ones work
because it does not fit your ideology. You seem to sick your nose up at science based evidence. This Jeff Prager material is full of assumptions and
my belief statements. with absolutely no evidence on how his theories work. Maybe I am looking at the wrong material could you please post the
material you are speaking of?

She's actually clearly stated many of times she does not think it was a space based weapon.

Not here she didn't.

She had the perfect opportunity to say 'no space based'. But she didn't.
She did say she 'looked at pictures'.
Not very scientific is she.

It's all innuendo and supposition.
Just like all the other 911 conspiracy theories.

She clearly states
"We haven't even gotten around to listing them yet. JUST ENERGY WEAPONS"
The he states " In what form?"
and she say "I don't think we need to define them"

Space base would be defining them.

Here's where most of the misinformation comes from.

When people want to ridicule her, they refer to “space beams.” She does use the term “Star Wars beam weapons” but this is a reference to
energy-weapon technology associated with the “Star Wars” missile defense program (the Strategic Defense Initiative). She says research on energy
weapons goes back a century and remains classified.

Her whole moto is look at what happened and not how and to not jump to conclusions and when ever ask what type of energy weapon was used she never
says what kind.
If you provide a video in which she states space based weapons where used on 911 I will admit Im wrong. Again Im not agreeing with her conclusions I
just think its wrong to miss represents some ones point of view.

But I do have another question about the whole nuclear mini or exotic or what ever. How did people survive inside of the building while these nuclear
detonations where occurring and survive to talk about it? These weapons most have produces tremendous amounts of energy to vaporize material? Why was
tremendous heat not describe by the people in the building or on the street. Also wheres the light? Nuclear weapons produce blinding amounts of
visible light. Can any one explain how these weapons did not produce a single source of light?

What are you babbling about? And why? Go read the Jeff Prager material and the USGS dust evidence.

As far as Judy Wood goes, she 'implied' lots of things including some imaginary space based weapons, then went off on a ramble about 'wheat chex'
and 'poofs' and such. She seems to delight in vagueness coupled with a Saturday afternoon cartoon version of descriptions.

Dr. Judy Wood is not vague about the facts her hypothesis are based on.

She said the only explanation that fits ALL of the facts is a newly discovered phenomenon that combines the fundamental forces of nature to affect
metal and concrete like microwaves affect water. Like the movement caused by a magnet or like the dissolving of sugar cubes in water.

Almost no energy is changed when sugar cubes dissolve. The water's action is a result of local electromagnetic forces acting at the level of
electrons and atomic nuclei. If an electromagnetic pattern could be made by interference of all normal electrical forces and a few specific extra man
made ones, a pattern that acts on solids like the pattern of water acts on sugar, then all of the facts of 911 can be explained.

Otherwise, with any other explanation, some of the facts get unaddressed, ignored or denied.

The truth eventually comes out! Don't trust what any "authorities" or "mass media" is told to tell you about any subject. Look up anything on
the internet first and you will get the story from all angles. Choose the ones that make the most sense to you. Always doubt any "official" story as
usually 180 degrees (the exact opposite) is almost always true!

They actually cause cancer with the chemicals they use on everything, including people and food. The best thing you can do is to avoid known
chemicals and carcinogens (buy everything organic that you can) and use natural cleaning products. You can use bleach, hydrogen peroxide, apple cider
vingear and baking soda for almost everything in combination.

If you have or want to prevent yourself or loved ones from getting cancer, search the net, you will find many actual cancer cures, not just treatments
(the ones doctors tell you about acutally cause cancer, yeah they treat cancer by causing it!) . In fact most people don't die from cancer, they die
from the treatment of their cancer.

Check this article which shows a few natural cancer remedies that will help you on
your way to being cancer free and preventing it from even showing up in your life!

a reply to: conz1992 There are too many rare blood and bone cancers in the cluster to pin the blame on asbestos. Dr. Ward has
been running around with his hair on fire for over a decade about this. Proven 9-11 Nukes
edwardmd.wordpress.com...

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.