Movie Massacre Trial of James Holmes to Begin With 9,000 Potential Jurors

Share this:

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

The logistics of putting James Holmes on trial are as staggering as the carnage he allegedly committed in a crowded movie theater in Aurora, Colorado, in July 2012 when 12 people were killed and 58 others injured in gunfire.

With the removal of 12 possible witnesses from the jury pool, the number of potential witnesses receiving a summons could now be as high as 43, though prosecutors acknowledged in court papers “that it is likely two individuals could have the same names and not be the same person as the endorsed prosecution witnesses in this case.”

The judge said “the court appreciates this information” but added that prosecutors should file another notice if such a conflict arises during jury selection.

The potential conflicts don’t end there.

Additionally, four potential jurors are related to the prosecutor’s staff: two husbands, a father and an uncle. Another potential juror is a best friend of a prosecution staff member. A wife and a former colleague of prosecution witnesses are also potential jurors, prosecutors say..

But the judge declined immediately to excuse those seven potential jurors. “Because neither party asks the court to take any action with respect to these individuals, the court refrains from doing so at this time,” the judge said.

What do the victims’ families say about all this?

District Attorney George Brauchler spoke with relatives of 60 victims who died or were injured.

After consulting the families, he announced the prosecution will seek the death penalty for Holmes.

“In this case, for James Eagan Holmes, justice is death,” Brauchler said in court.

Prosecutors have charged in court that Holmes “intended to kill them all,” referring to patrons in the crowded movie theater watching the midnight release of the Batman film “The Dark Knight Rises.”

Holmes was heavily armed and “dressed head-to-toe in protective gear,” authorities said. He wore black contact lenses to conceal his eyes. His AR-15 jammed during the massacre, and police arrested him in the parking lot.

Meanwhile, Tom and Caren Teves, parents of son Alex who was among those killed, continue a campaign exhorting news outlets to focus on victims and not even mention suspects’ names in mass shootings. Alex Teves died while protecting his girlfriend from bullets.

Their plea to media is now called the #NoNotoriety Challenge: “Stop rewarding mass murderers with the media attention they crave,” their Facebook page says.

What does Holmes’ family say?

Parents Robert and Arlene Holmes haven’t given any interviews about their son, but in December, they issued a public letter stating that “we have spent every moment for more than two years thinking about” the victims and their families.

Before the mass killing, their son “never harmed anyone and he had no criminal history,” the parents said.

“We have read postings on the Internet that have likened him to a monster. He is not a monster. He is a human being gripped by a severe mental illness,” they wrote.

The parents want life imprisonment without parole for their son in exchange for a guilty plea, but the prosecutor has rejected such an offer from Holmes’ attorneys.

Holmes’ family decried the need for a trial, saying it would cause additional trauma and “force everyone to relive those horrible moments in time.”

“We believe that the death penalty is morally wrong, especially when the condemned is mentally ill,” the parents said.

“The focus should be on the injured and their healing,” they added, referring to the theater victims.

What happened to the movie theater?

Aurora’s Century 16 cinema complex reopened in January 2013.

Elected officials and community members joined victims and their relatives at a remembrance ceremony timed with the theater’s reopening, which featured a screening of “The Hobbit.”

But relatives of nine people killed in the gunfire criticized the remembrance ceremony as a publicity stunt by Cinemark, which runs the cinema.

Those families called the event “disgusting” and “wholly offensive to the memory of our loved ones.”

But Tim Warner, Cinemark’s chief executive officer, which is facing lawsuits from several victims’ families and survivors, noted how “recovery is an ongoing process.”