Why Camillo Ricordi is not credible

I met Camillo
Ricordi just once. In my life as in my job, I have no enemies to strike or
friends to justify. However, public behaviour and coherence inside and outside
our profession are essential, if we want to be credible. Ricordi, in my
opinion, is not. His public behaviour “not in favour or against” a State fraud that
is damaging the patients is not excusable (especially, I would say) if you have
a “big name”.

His
attempt to get credits by “discrediting Italian science and medicine”, as we could
not fully comprehend what Stamina is doing, is not excusable.

As I
already stated at the Healthcare Commission of the Senate and according to what
we have been told by the media, this story seems to exist surely not because
there is a “method” (which does not exist) or “two improvisers” whom not even a
Biology students would listen to, but because:

Within the Lombardy healthcare management and also in
a public hospital, some saw in the “nonsense Stamina” a “cure” for themselves
and/or their relatives at the expense of our National Healthcare System.
Evidences were lacking, as, of course, was the national approval, but in front
of your loved ones’ disease, how could you say no? Therefore, instead of
working from a basement in Turin, in San Marino o somewhere else in Eastern
Europe, the medical “nonsense” managed to enter an Italian public hospital. Was there any offence or abuse behind this
entrance? Which role did the regional and local healthcare management play, or
the local ethics committee? What informed consent forms were signed and by
whom, who did formally authorize the infusions in Brescia, how could the
Medical Board (which one? The local one or the national one?) or the clinicians
of a public hospital tolerate that unknown preparations (few weeks ago the hospital management did
confirmed that they were unknown) were injected to their patients? All these
questions need answers.

Before
entering a public hospital, these patients were paying big amounts to the Stamina
Foundation. The Foundation management explained: “only some patients were paying
30,000 or 50,000 euros, others who could not afford it, were not. In
practice, those who could were paying for the others”. But did they know
it? When Stamina entered the public hospital, these costs passed on the
State’s bill. Whoever was treated in Brescia, the alleged relatives or the
healthcare managers themselves, did not spend one euro. The State paid,
the same one that does not have enough money for bandages and syringes for
those hospitals administering certified therapies.

There
has been a deafening silence from an important hospital of North Italy,
with its renewed clinicians. Only few professionals partly raised their
voices to take some distance. How did such a solid part of Italian
Medicine fall under this kind of collective hypnosis? Each practitioner,
each authority has the moral and professional obligation to contribute to
this clarification. Still, it is a fact that in Brescia hospital a graduate
in Literature “entered the hospital access codes” and even signed the
certificates attesting that Stamina preparations were free from pathogens.
Despite the Italian Agency of Medicine (AIFA)’s intervention in May 2012 - with a ban ordinance that is a
competence masterpiece - for the
protection of patients against frauds, nobody kicked Stamina out of the
hospital, the State, the World, as it would have happened for much less
serious cases in the United States or in Germany.

The
patients, pushed by Stamina, appealed to court. Judges ordered to
administer “the never-therapy” acknowledging the patients’ right to be
treated “even if the cure does not exist”. This decision has been taken
upon “illegal” medical prescriptions. These “cures” were authorized, in
fact, based on requisites and authorizations provided by Stamina
Foundation itself. In the meantime, Ezio Belleri, Brescia
extraordinary commissioner, finally understood that something was wrong
and called a halt. But nothing more. (How could judges not understand that
Stamina does not even have the requisites for the MD Turco Fazio 2006 or
the 2003 MD for “compassionate care”?)

Politicians
just looked away. It is not their field and they do not know yet how to
refer to the professionals who are at the Country’s service. There was the
horrific Balduzzi decree on March 2013, followed by another action by the
Parliament - with the Chamber of Deputies urged to fix a serious mistake
that had even worsened the decree, approved by a just appointed Senate, unready
for examining the documents purposely ruffled up for confounding everything.
It was May 2013 when they approved the State experimentation of “nothing”.
Then, the brave Minister Beatrice Lorenzin consulted her scientific
commission that called for a halt. The whole world knew that there was
sand or physiologic solution in those infusions (that we paid, including
the state planes that brought patients from one place to another for
useless bone cell sampling, cells to be transformed in inexistent
neurons). Italy seemed to have been formally saved, even though some
judges “went on doing their job” and kept prescribing “the never-therapy”.
At this point, the TAR (Regional Administrative Court) of Lazio Region
intervened stating that the Minister Lorenzin Scientific Committee was not
impartial. Back to the start. It really looks like someone is very
interested in experimenting this “nothing” at the expense of the State.
Could there be any political pressure behind? Even the graduate in
Literature who “invented the method” (falsified and copied by Russian
“science”) depositing it at the Ministry of Health the last August and
obtaining to keep it secret (why? It was already well known, by reading
the response by the Patent Office in the US, that there was no method,
only dead cells), said that there was nothing to experiment and that Italy
should have saved those 3 million. Besides, as he explained, the SMA (flag
disease of the Stamina “cure” and of a TV program on “Stamina”) should not
have been included in the experimentation of his “method” since it is such
a variable disease that it is impossible in (only?!)18 months to observe
any benefits.

Now
it is the turn of a famous academic from Miami, a diabetes specialist, a
name, but not in Neurology. His declarations on Stamina should cause disconcert
in the whole Italian academic, scientific and medical world. In this already
complicated situation, Ricordi stated he is “not against on in favour” of
a charlatan who says he can transform “shoes” into “chickens” simply
covering them in parsley for 2 hours. Then he points out that, even though
the shoe cannot actually become a chicken in vitro, it could be transformed in vivo. Ricordi takes part to a TV show and, talking about
Stamina, alludes to the misunderstood science of Galileo Galilei and
Copernicus. Speaking about the stopped clinical experimentation (by
minister Lorenzin and with the agreement of the graduate in Literature,
Vannoni), he says that “not doing it is criminal and, after all, 3
million” – not his money – “are just nothing”. Considering he is a
diabetes specialist, his declaration released to La Stampa on “Stamina method”: “neurons are made, in vitro, in vivo from mesenchymal
cells”, are disconcerting.

Ricordi is not credible in his positions on Stamina
and he is damaging Italy.