Hi and thanks for visiting the best Ravens forum on the planet. You do not have to be a member to browse the various forums, but in order to post and interact with your purple brethren, you will have to **register**. It only takes a couple of minutes. You can also use your Facebook account to log in....just click on the blue 'FConnect' link at the very top of the page.

Re: Ed Reed could “definitely” see himself as a Patriot

That's fine...

The Patriots are sitting at home right now
Ed Reed and the Ravens are in NO, playing for a ring.

Next year is next year.

.
.
“When I think of a Baltimore Raven - we go in there, we take your lunch box, we take your sandwich, we take your juice box, we take your applesauce, and we take your spork and we break it. And we leave you with an empty lunch. That’s the Baltimore Raven way.” - Steve Smith Sr.

Re: Ed Reed could “definitely” see himself as a Patriot

Originally Posted by NJRaven

i don't care where he ends up, but i do care that he's talking about it right now.

I've been saying this all year.

If we don't re-sign him, he is going to be a Patriot.

Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.

Re: Ed Reed could “definitely” see himself as a Patriot

Originally Posted by Justlovemybirds

The only question is whether it's a one year, second shot a ring deal (I think so) or a 2-3 year thing.

And this is what I don't get. People join the Patriots for a shot at a ring, not the money. Why leave a team (the Ravens) that consistently outplays the Patriots to go play for the Patriots? Are the Pats really going to break the bank and pay him that much more than the Ravens would?