On the off chance that this plan is approved, the next 10 years could see these four states lose billions of dollars worth of revenue-sharing payments from oil and gas developments close to their shores, which they are currently planning to use for land reclamation and environment protection. The plan drew criticism not only from elected politicians from the Gulf Coast states, but also from the oil and gas industry.

The proposal for the U.S. budget for fiscal year 2018 includes a plan to repeal the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 in order to redirect revenue-sharing payments that were set to be paid to these states to the federal tax payer. Under the Act, states and their local jurisdictions receive 37.5 percent of Federal Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) revenues generated from certain leases. The Act has deferred most payments until 2018, so the states have yet to begin receiving these funds. According to estimates in the budget plan, by scrapping payments to states, the federal savings would amount to US$1.685 billion between 2018 and 2022, and a total of US$3.56 billion between 2018 and 2027.

The proposal to stop revenue sharing was met with angry reactions from the industry, environmental organizations, and Democrat and Republican governors and senators.

National Ocean Industries Association (NOIA) criticized the proposal for repealing the revenue sharing program. “Eliminating Gulf state revenue sharing for offshore energy production would punish coastal states that support and host the development of home-grown energy and jobs, and would be a serious step backward in the quest for energy reliability and independence,” NOIA President Randall Luthi said in a statement.

Wildlife and environment preservation organizations also voiced disapproval, and urged Congressional leaders “to fight this proposal with everything they can”. Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards, a Democrat, also criticized the plan. He remarked that “this budget robs Louisiana of financial resources promised to us for coastal restoration. In recent years, Louisiana and waters just off its shore have been the second largest producer of crude oil and natural gas in the nation”.

US Senator Bill Cassidy, MD (R-LA) also slammed the proposal, saying in a statement, “There are deal breakers for me in the current budget. For one, this budget fails to prioritize restoring Louisiana’s eroding coasts… As the committee process moves forward, I will not only oppose cuts to the revenue sharing program but continue to work to expand it for the gulf coast.”

House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA), while commenting that the budget is balanced, also referred to the revenue sharing program in his statement. He assured voters that he “will also be working to ensure that any budget we pass in the House addresses the priorities important to Louisiana, including fiscal responsibility, increased energy production and the revenue sharing that goes along with it, so we can strengthen our energy security while also restoring our eroding coast.”

Still, the plan to scrap the oil royalty payments, as well as the budget draft, need to pass Congress vetting, and expectations are that stopping revenue sharing with the Gulf Coast states would face fierce opposition.

President Trump’s other oil and gas related requests in the budget—to sell half of the U.S. strategic petroleum reserve (SPR), and to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas drilling—would likely face opposition, too.

President Trump’s plan to scrap revenue-sharing payments is not new: President Obama, too, tried to cut the royalties to Gulf Coast states from offshore drillers near their coastline. At the time, state governments put up fierce opposition, and this is likely to repeat now.

8 Republican Senators, and a bunch of Republican and Democrat House members, won't like losing all that money for their states. 4 Republican governors won't either. The State residents might miss the tax revenue too. Although they can pay more tax to make up for the lost revenue. ha, ha, ha...

Naomi on May 26 2017 said:

The Federal Government owes an unpayable $20Trillion. Every Democrat City pension cannot be paid. There's no money there to fight over.

Leave a comment

First Name

Last Name

Email

That email address is already in the database. Please login to your account to post your comment, or enter a different email address to continue with your comment & account creation.

Captcha

Comment

Please understand that, by submitting this form, you will be creating a free OilPrice.com account, and therefore agree to abide by our Terms of Use. Your details will be stored in our database and shared with our third party mailing list provider. You will be sent an email containing a link that will ask you to generate a new password - please follow the link to complete your OilPrice account activation.

We will save the information entered above in our website. Your comment will then await moderation from one of our team. If approved, your data will then be publically viewable on this article. Please confirm you understand and are happy with this and our privacy policy by ticking this box. You can withdraw your consent, or ask us to give you a copy of the information we have stored, at any time by contacting us.