Archive

And it allowed a stupid “Paula” to make a stupid and worthless comment:

“This makes as much sense as anything in the bible.”

What did I say?:

“A silly legend. I’ll stick with my eternal God who made and rules the omniverse and will one day bring salvation to all those who loved truth, justice and mercy, and eternal sorrow and destruction to those who hated or ignored it in their addiction to pleasure, or pride or concern more for their own temporary life than God’s eternal will, which if followed, brings eternal contentment and joy.

@Paula “This makes as much sense as anything in the bible.” said the religious ignoramus who couldn’t figure out what

Don’t make or worship imaginary gods:
Don’t use the name Yahweh in vain
Don’t steal
Remember the sabbath, that God made the universe in five days and rested on the sixth,
Don’t bear false testimony,
Don’t commit adultery,
Honor your parents,
Don’t covet what belongs to your neighbor,
The Lord your God is one, love him with all your heart and mind,
Love your neighbor as yourself,
Do to others as you would have them do to you,
Forgive all

Oh, so nonsensical Paula. Truly the nonsensical ones are people like you, who hatefully parrot, who smugly make attacks because it merely feels good. Evil is what you are for denying what is clearly sensible and obviously good.

Now do tell us queen Paula what is your list of good to compare to the one God gave us more than 2000 years ago Miss “I Invented The Real Wheel, Ignore That Thing Over there Which The World Has Been Using and Advancing With for 2000 Years”? You are blinded by Satan and love ignorance.”

Will the liberal, atheist Smithsonian allow my comments? According to smug liberals, they are fair and tolerant of all religions and of all religions too, except to those which say homosexuality is wrong (and why just that, I imagine because it reflects their thought that perversion is a holy and sacred thing, and is one of those things which expresses their deepest hatred of God).

And by that silly logic Piers, 311,993,400 clearly clearly want to have and keep fully automatic guns and see all children abused and turned into psychopathic narcissistic murderers. Only 14% of Americans use Twitter, 311,993,400 clearly aren’t following you. Thanks. Britain banned the narcissist Michael Savage for unpleasant political speech, why not Piers Morgan the pandering narcissist for his speaking out against the law of America?

Retweeted by Piers Morgan: (from “btannebaum”) “I want to sign a petition to end all White House Petitions”.

Meaning you’re an illogical contradictory hypocrite, Mr. “Silence the Mouth of the People, But Not Mine” Tannebaum. If King Hussein did his job there would be no need for any.

Anti-Christians are very good at punching themselves in the mouth or placing their fist right in front of their face so that slight stumble on a block of truth lands a punch.

Why Trying to Ban Gun Ownership or Ownership of High Capacity Magazines By Citizens Is Wrong and Unhelpful or: Why Piers Morgan’s Reasons for Attacking the 2nd Amendment Is Illogical:

1) The government is not perfect at all, nor the police, so to make out citizens who have “treated him incredibly well” as why to leave, is backwards, hypocritical and oblivious thinking.

2) It is because so many citizens are well armed that the federal government, on a whim can’t easily or can only inefficiently commit a war of tyranny or to try and subjugate all the citizens to conform to its will and desires (non-Christians often try to get people to obey their desires without saying what those desires are or indicating them to someone who is unfamiliar with them, which is nonsensical of non-Christians, for example the “I don’t know you therefore I don’t want to be your friend or help you” paradox: how then does the non-Christian get help when they want it or how did they make their friends?). Piers is also ignoring that governments and police misuse guns and their weapons by using them as a mere threat to enforce bad laws and grope or arrest you over their mere suspicions or hurt pride. So then Piers should be against the ownership of guns by even government, police and soldiers too.

3) Piers, rather than admit he is in error, is choosing to hold on to his pride. This is typical of non-Christians. “Pride comes before a fall.” – God

4) Guns don’t kill people, people kill people, therefore it’s certain type of people who should be “repealed” from owning guns. That is already in place, but Morgan is blaming a mom’s bad decision to leave her guns out (or in the exhaustion of caring for her son herself, perhaps rejecting to use a nanny to help out), which is then throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Imagine if someone made a bow and arrow so strong it could penetrate two deer at once, or go an extremely long distance. And say “a crazy” gets one and uses it to assassinate someone, should then that bow and arrow be banned so that the advantage for hunters who use it is lost, because a small many misused them?

Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation. And a house divided against a house falls. … For from now on, there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three.
Luke 11:17, 12:52

And if a house is divided against itself,
that house cannot stand.
Mark 3:25

1) Christianity in America is polluted with New Ageism, Arminianism and Liberalism or antiTrinitarian nonsense (which leads to polytheism nonsense). More than half the Christians have minds heavily polluted with logical fallacies that come from those three isms. Mormonism is polluted with Freemasonry and Occultism. The country is divided between a huge number of different types of Christians therefore, as in with different moral standards and interpretations of basic Bible scriptures. These false Christians also drain America’s money, especially using the tithing heresy, which is that Christians are to give a tenth of their income to their church (or whoever these false Christians make seem is the most worthy to get the tithe). Much of that donated money goes to either more advertising for more tithes or donations of other types, spreading their false version of Christianity and into their personal banks.

Many liberals are anti-science New Agers who drain America’s money by duping people or convincing them that New Age beliefs are right and traditional Christianity (the Reformed/Calvinistic type) is wrong. Because of this there is moral confusion as to right from wrong, and where there is moral confusion there are psychopaths and narcissists who will be raised up and who will multiply endlessly, and often getting into leadership positions (including parental) and in those positions, can do extreme damage, including mass murder.

2) Psychopaths and narcissists are becoming more and more common in America. They are one of the main reasons America is being ruined. A huge number of them are in prisons all over America (and the world) and everyone is being taxed to death because of it.

They are entrenched in many jobs, including leadership positions. Clinton and Obama are narcissists even and yet many Americans love and support them. They should be permanently enslaved and put to hard labor. The ones that committed crimes for sure in adulthood, and who do so for pleasure, should be fed poorly and made to do something useful like de-ice Greenland or mine dangerous mines and the things they mine out sold and the profit given over to orphanages or kids who need money to survive.

Any beautiful ones should be cloned and the clones raised lovingly so that they don’t turn out like their “parent”. Yes, I said cloned. Why? Because a loss of beauty from the human gene pool is a terrible thing. Also, the less genes there are to go around, the more like mass deaths might occur from people who lack immunity to withstand them. Yes, you just read that. Next:

There should be a standardized test given to everyone who applies for employment, to determine whether or not they are a psychopath (psych) or narcissist (narc), and if they fail, should be monitored from outside their property (no snooping unless evidence of a crime is committed) and any friends of family of theirs questioned to determine the personality of that person, and if good evidence comes up that they are a psych or narc, should be imprisoned until any change in their personality shows they are neither. Instead, the p’s and n’s are allowed to roam freely so long as they don’t commit any obvious crime, and so create all kinds of damage or stir up anger, which leads to mental illnesses or trauma and Hellish arguments that lead to crime.

3) America’s legal system accepts a single witness as sufficient to make an ACCUSATION despite no corroboration of the same event as EVIDENCE, a clear violation of common sense and a violation of the principle of the Declaration of Independence’s “right to pursue happiness”. You can’t pursue happiness if GOSSIP is entertained and accepted by law. It’s also hypocritically since “hearsay” is rejected, yet direct one person accusation testimony isn’t, why is one acceptable and the other not?! Nonsense logic.

4) Atheists and anti-Christians have gained a strong propaganda position for decades by having hijacked public schools and their history, literature and science textbooks and have made America in the eyes of hundreds of millions appear to be better off secular and made it appear as if those “founding fathers” including the Pilgrims, who left Britain, did so merely for “freedom of religion” rather than FREEDOM IN CHRIST. And they made it appear as if The Theory of Evolution was based on science, that science is the only way to know the truth, and that science and freedom to say and practice whatever religion or philosophy you want is what makes America great. Doing whatever you want is not what makes anything great, nor can people do whatever they want religiously: you aren’t allowed to murder in the name of some religion. To teach these things causes confusion about history and moral degredation.

5) In the liberal media, atheists and anti-Christians have made it appear as if “going with your heart” is also good, or the best thing to do, but that if you are a conservative and go against liberalism, evolution dogma or big bang dogma, that that’s bad. So multiple contradictions there which causes massive confusion and conflict among Americans, and anyone trying to reason with them.

6) The atheists and anti-Christians have successfully duped hundreds of millions of Americans every 20 years into giving up much of their money for secular education, in public schools, colleges and universities, forcing them to memorize their Darwin-and liberal/libertine-based dogma and to pander to those who are it’s main pushers in order to “get ahead” in life / make more money that the average person, not be poor, and to live comfortably. This causes moral degradation and leads to people caring more about money and pleasure than the truth, truth which leads to eternal peace and truth.

7) Atheists have polluted the Internet with many copycat pages of logical fallacy lists which Google, the most popular search engine, puts at the top of their search results, and of course these atheists have given these logical fallacy lists an anti-theism spin, deceiving millions every year into thinking that theism and religion is illogical, or of not deceiving, reinforcing existing deception. This causes moral degradation and confusion as to what logic is.

8) Bankers, clearly anti-Christian ones, the ones who manage billions of dollars, have used ursury to profit off of the world, and by doing so have helped drive everyone into debt. The Bible forbids ursury, and by not listening to the Bible, they have caused everyone to become desperate for money and comfort rather than allowing them to use their mental energies to focus on what matters more: pleasing God and getting eternal peace. So this too causes moral and economic degredation. Bankers now are known to have come with all kinds of evil schemes to steal money from others, even from other banks.

9) Celebrities, who are living idols, they by their example of lead America into going along with the bankers, atheists, liberals and anti-Christians. Youths, who are ignorant at first, are easily lead astray by those who are beautiful, powerful and who get the most attention. So celebrities have caused moral degredation.

10) Game designers have polluted the world with godless or anti-theistic, violent games, which male youths especially love, so they too have spread moral degredation.

11) The rich of the world have both sat on their money at the hurt of the poor and needy and used it to gain more money, and help the anti-Christians and liberals to continue propspering as a group, so that they can continue to dupe them into thinkng that it’s best to buy from their businesses and the anti-Christians and liberals, who are people who are immoral and arbitrary and wasteful with money.

12) As mentioned in the previous entry, the Federal and state governments of America have been stuffing jails and prisons with anyone and everyone for any reason, and police, especially in certain states, like New Mexico and Nevada, have been abusing their position of authority to retaliate, slander, libel and arrest people for disrespecting them or not pandering to them. This has an obvious destructive effect on the economy and morality as it provokes hostility towards those who are supposed to be upholding the laws of the country, not disregarding them.

13) This 12th reason, which is mentioned in the Bible, at least indirectly, is prostitution. Prostitution, as the Bible says, spreads crime. Just use yoru imagination to figure out why it works at that way, or go read why. Prostituion, for example, leads to higher rates of abortion. Abortion is murder, and the more you murder (if you have a conscience), the more you want to forget you’ve murdered. The usual way for a prostitute to try and forget is alcohol or some hard drug, like meth or crack, and overuse of alcohol and those drugs, which is common, leads to criminal acts and accidentally or in the heat of anger od desperation for more drugs, killing others. It also makes prostitutes vulnerable to rape, and of course prostites are more likely to be raped then not being that they are seen as near worthless except, logically, for sex.

14) The more abortions, the less competitive a nation is against other nations. Though the atheist nations China, Russia and Vietnam have a much higher abortion rates than the USA, so much higher that have a major male to female ration problem (which eventually leads to wars both internally and externally due to frustrated men or women) they make up for it with their superior resources, underground child labor, and greater use of their natural resources (unlike America, which locks up vast amounts of them in national forests like Yellowstone). Those countries also don’t have massive amount of their population imprisoned, and so have a larger work force. That is why, despite America’s large popular and figuratively speaking, limitless natural resources, it is losing against Russia and China. Consider: how many Tesla’s have their been in America’s history, or world history? Is it helping by aborting over 10 million babies a year? It’s a fact that extreme genius is often natural, like the ability to dance or sing well. Even if the abortions leave more resources for already existing geniuses to be able to be as helpful as Tesla, where are they then? Where are the super inventors? Where is even a Henry Ford? Clearly abortion kills not just babies, but the nation the they are killed in. The point, is that without these super innovators to come along ever few decades, that there will be technological stagnation, which helps to increase stress and frustration. With an expanding population, speedier technologies need to be created, otherwise information and help is delayed to the point where there are great losses, including life, and that causes resentment, and eventually the resentment, if not appeased, boils over into fighting, and if the fighting isn’t stopped, it leads to battles, and if the battles are not stopped, it leads to wars, and when war happens, the country is no longer a single country, but two new countries.

15) Physical health problems are everywhere in America. It’s as if they were covered with plagues. It’s a country filled with diseased people, cancer ridden people and very obese people and people who have a greatly reduced ability to work for various reasons, like meth or alcohol addiction, missing limbs, defective brains, or chronic fatigue caused by chronic depression or chemical poisoning from the water, air or prescription drugs with damaging side effects.

16) The Iraq War, aka Operation Iraqi Freedom and Afghanistan War aka Operation Enduring Freedom, besides having resulted in a loss of millions of lives, lives who were attacked without a just cause (not including God’s causes), for example the little Iraqi children who had nothing to do with the Iraq War except for being in Iraq, but have also cost America approximately 6 trillion dollars. The Chinese loan us money, we go into debt, and those who make the weapons of mass destruction, who drill for and supply the oil, and make the vehicles for transport and war, and who provide the drink and food, and the soldiers, they make money, but does it benefit America in general? No it doesn’t, because those profiting from the war are less than five percent of America, even when you include all the American employees of these companies that help the wars to continue. Yes, that less than five percent spends money on restaurants in America, grocery stores, and so on, but those who make the most money sit on it and many of them invest in foreign companies, not American. And they sit on their wealth so that they can take pride in being among the richest. Billions of dollars sit in banks, making bankers wealthy too, who also sit on their money to the hurt of everyone else. Sitting on millions and billions is like sitting on expensive goods and not using them. It doesn’t do anyone any good, not even the one sitting on them. It’s an act of hate, not love, to hoard wealth.

“The love of money is the root of all evil” – The apostle Paul

“A house divided against itself cannot stand” – Yeshua, the only Son of God

“because of lawlessness the love of many will grow cold” – – Yeshua, who is God

According to “The New Liberalism” “liberalism was strategically misrepresented libertinism” by unnamed persons, so for all anyone knows this is just a delusion or lie by the writer who himself recognizes a real connection.

According to “The New Revolution: Libertine Liberal vs Classic Liberal”:

There is a difference between “liberal” and “libertine”. We have, in the course of many social revolutions, struggled to define that line with varying degrees of success. “Libertine” behavior has and will always be looked upon askance because the connotation of “libertine” means the breakdown of society and the breakdown of society has not always been for the good of society. “Libertine” is to be free, not only in thought and expression, but from morality and societal norms. “Liberal” is to believe in and support the idealism of freedom of thought and expression, but to lend it support from a moral base.

Therein lies our problem with modern day definition of the term “liberal”. Somewhere around 1967 the term “liberal” became confused with the “libertine” revolution of the counter culture. While the movement began in the grandest of idealism of freedom and equality for minorities, retaining its “liberal” idealism for a time, it quickly slipped its anchorage and drifted resolutely towards the “libertine”.

My thoughts on “Liberal” is to believe in and support the idealism of freedom of thought and expression, but to lend it support from a moral base.” is that it sounds like to me, “Liberalism is libertinism only with the attempt to justify it using morals” which is an obvious contradiction. It seems analogous to me like saying (without the pretentious “idealism” word), “Liberalism is the belief that you should be able to think whatever you feel like without being punished, and studying how to justify this belief using current (Christian?) morals or believing that they are (for what reason?)”. Therefore, liberalism is the belief that you should be able to think (what about “and feel”?) whatever you want to, from abusing and raping, torturing and murdering for fun, to imagine and express with delight abusing kids and the destruction of all moral beings with the justification for doing so with (Christian?) morality. This is obviously a contradictory belief system, just like Hinduism with it’s original practices of widow-burning and ritualistic murder of strangers/travelers yet claiming that it’s about enlightening yourself by avoiding “evil”, and not saying what “evil” is.

Strangely, Wikipedia (which says a libertine is a person without morals) has a hidden key phrase on its libertinism entry: “Classical liberalism”. Being that Wikipedia is controlled by liberals (the head being the liberal and atheist Jimmy/Jimbo Wales (who also apparently has narcissism disorder), it’s obvious to me why they would hide saying that liberalism was based on immorality. Why they would hide the phrase though, is something I don’t understand, though I can imagine a demon was mocking God in a connivingly and malicious way, by possessing someone and getting them to place that hint. I tried to see if the phrase was simply an outdated Google result by looking at Google’s cache, but found nothing. The Classical Liberalism entry also makes no connection. The only page in which the two are mentioned together is the Individualism page (which by the way is worded pretentiously and not something a “lay person” could easily understand).

Side note: To my surprise I found out that John Calvin had interacted with and spoke against “libertines” (1)(2)(3), surprised because that man figures prominently in my life, and just didn’t think it would have anything to do with him.

The sad thing is is that “libertine” would best have been associated with Christianity, especially Catholics who became true Christians after being freed from Roman Catholicism, but “freethinkers” (many of whom seem to be atheists) messed that up, just like they did with the words “free”, “liberal*”, “science” and “skeptic” (1)(2). They also try to do this with logical fallacies (which has to do with philosophy). The only atheist I can think of who made a decent contribution to any of these fields is Bertrand Russel for philosophy and Tesla for electronics and engineering. Mark Twain contributed to humor.

*The link to the word liberal (above) links to a blog on the ancient meaning of the word liberal and uses a certain word for a certain male private part that some may consider offensive.

Wikipedia is a propaganda tool for anti-Christians and narcissists who want to somehow prove that they are superior to those around them and to feed their craving for attention, but without risking their public reputation by being exposed as cyberbullies and retaliation against them for it (hence why they hide their identities). The goal of Wikipedia is also to subtly fool people into thinking that Wikipedia is trustworthy and that the Bible is only partially reliable and ultimately that since there is no God to answer to or who can hurt or reward anyone, that whoever has the control (which wouldn’t be God) makes right, as a narcissist might say.

So what does Jimmy Wales and his army of gullibles want our money for, or as Jimmy puts it currently, our $5 for? They seem to fancy that ht money is meant to enlighten you about anything and everything you want to know about, but it’s not that simple. First, the obvious: Wikipedia is an excellent propaganda tool. The information on it can be found elsewhere, and it puts it together on one page. So what. Second, the money doesn’t just go to bandwidth in general, it’s used up mostly on stupid pages (see list of stupid waste of bandwidth pages below). Guess why? Because most of the world is stupid. I’m sure the idea is to get people to think, “Wow Wikipedia got this right, wow it let me know all these cool facts really fast about Michael Jackson and din’t make fun of him, my hero, at all” so that when Wikipedia says that evolution is true and creationism false, the same idiot will think, “Well they got MJ’s profile right, so they must be trustworthy with everything else,” in the hopes that such morons will influence others to be the same way till there are no Christians left, just stupid and easy-to-manipulate people who won’t make them (the Wikipedia know-it-alls) feel bad for being the immoral, self-centered, lying, hypocrite, manipulators that they are. So, what those donations are mostly covering are pages that don’t further civilization/advancement in living longer, happier, with an improved knowledge of the most helpful truths for those things, but instead, destroy it. Here’s the top 100 most popular pages on Wikipedia for 2009, with my comments written after the number of people given who viewed the page for the year).

1. Wiki (131,383 page hits per day) = 47,954,795 total views for the year. So, Jimmy Wales wants Christians, all theists, and all atheist to pay $5 to teach people that he invented Wikipedia (false)? Cuz that’s the claim where “Wiki” ends up leading visitors to.

2. The Beatles (111,896) = 40,842,040 million hits a year. Jimmy Wales wants Christians, all theists, to pay $5 so the world can learn about the Beatles? No Jimmy atheist, no.

3. Michael Jackson (79,734) = 29,102,910. Jimmy Wales wants Christians, all theists, to pay $5 so the world can learn about Homosexual Pedophile-inclined singer with multiple bad nose jobs even in the controversy section, which Jimmy whitewashes out of the MJ article? Because? Is Wikipedia for celebrity promoting and advertising Jimmy? No Jimmy Atheist Wales, you’re not getting my money.

4. Favicon.ico (78,077) = 28,498,105. No Jimmy, won’t be donating so that you can have more bandwidth to teach people about favicon.ico.

5. YouTube (72,318) = 28,498,105. No I won’t donate $5 so you can learn about Youtube, just go to Youtube and learn from Youtube itself.

6. Wikipedia (52,542) = 19,177,830. No I’m not donating $5 so you can learn about Wikipedia or learn a new random fact from it’s homepage.

7. Barack Obama (49,401). Liberal fodder. No five.

8. Deaths in 2009 (48,758). Lovely what attracts the non-Christian and false Christian world. Not “Breakthroughs of 2009″ not “Greatest achievements of 2009″ or just all time world-benefiting breakthroughs or achievements, not even for the decade, no, it’s “deaths for this year.” And the anti-Christian world says Christians are morbid and full of hate? Backwards, evil, blind, negative idiots. You’re not inspiring at all anti-Christians, you’re depressing and morbid with an unhealthy interest in pain, fighting and death.

9. United States (46,545). You can only learn about the US from Wikipedia? Nope, far from it. There’s city-data, the CIA, and many other sites.

10. Facebook (42,679). Try watching Social Networking first.

11. Current events portal [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current_events] (40,962). An encyclopedia of current events? Uh… what happened to CNN, Fox, ABC, NBC, Reuters, Bloomberg, Asianews, CNBC, and using the many years old RSS feed button? No five dollars.

12. World War II (29,736). But you won’t be learning that Hitler was a narcissist who endorsed atheism. No five for you.

13. Twitter (28,511). Boring. No five.

14. Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (28,395). Of course anti-social nerds with no life and little kids are attracted to Wikipedia: it talks about anything and everything except actually giving all the facts against evolutionism, big bangism, and the Jimmy Wales Wikipedia cult.

15. Slumdog Millionaire (26,755). That’s an important topic to use up thousands of dollars of bandwidth for isn’t it? No. No five let alone five million.

16. Lil Wayne (26,210). But not Jesus. No five.

17. Adolf Hitler (25,481). No five unless you’re going to point out Hitler had narcissism disorder and endorsed the atheist Nietzsche’s books (and in stop lying about Christians, Christian history and the Bible).

18. India (25,380). Like the USA, you can learn about India from plenty of other sources than the untrustworthy Wikipedia. I know that Indians are one of the main drivers of the traffic to that page. It’s also one of the most popular because India has one of the world’s largest populations.

19. Transformers 2 (24,842). Fail again.

20. Scrubs (TV series) (24,758). And again.

21. Sex (24,754). Nope: can’t learn about sex elsewhere: you need Jimmy Wales to explain it to you. And like a hodgepodge fest of narcissist atheist nerds have any business teaching anyone about sex? Eeek.

22. Rhianna (24,670). Wow, no. I wonder why Jenna Jameson isn’t in the top 100. Says a lot that no matter how much you whore yourself and no matter how beautiful you still won’t make the top 100 in Wikipedia.

23. United Kingdom (24,300). Same as USA and India: look elsewhere.

24. Abraham Lincoln (23,743). Hmmm, let me guess if there would be an atheist spin on Abraham Lincoln. I wonder why American Civil War and the American Revolution aren’t in the top 100. I know those are standard public school topics. Maybe liberals have marginalized them for fear of being accused of spreading Christian teachings.

27. Lady GaGa (23,376). No I won’t give $5 so you can learn extensive information about the idiot narcissist who wears meat on her head and thinks the most important thing in life is looking like a rich crazy. Anyone know what a dandy is?

28. Star Trek (film) (22,990). Atheist Trek.

29. 2009 Swine Flu outbreak (22,968). I really wanna give $5 for atheist propaganda allied with the CDC (Center for Disease Censorship and Propaganda that started off with deadly experiments on humans). Not.

30. Featured content portal (22,829). So Wikipedia home page gets 19,177,830 hits a year, + millions more to their ,”Recommended by atheist narcissist control-freak nerds for the day” page. No five.

31. Megan Fox (22,573). And no one is hotter than MF? Sad. No five for the nerds who obsess on MF on Wikinerdia.

32. Naruto (22,573). Wow, kid and nerdfest. Where’s Pokemon?

33. Australia (22,544). See popular page 38.

34. Canada (22,437). Canada? Wonder if it has anything to do with marijuana.

35. World War I (22,307). Oh I get it: in American public school they have you do a piece on WWI and WW2, so guess where all the kids and teens and college students go for quick facts to reword, and why: cuz Google and Yahoo put it on the top five results (and no doubt those $5 bills are going to pay Google to be on the top ten.)

36. Vagina (22,295). Of course Jimmy is using the world’s money to teach everyone about the female private parts. No five.

38. Japan (21,797). (Oh I see why now Germany, Japan, China, Russia, Australia, the UK and the US are in the top 100, after I read through the top 100 and had a lil drink of beer): they were the major players in WWI AND WWII and linked to those pages.

39. Martin Luther King Jr (21,786). I wonder if shampedia mentions that MLK JR was an adulterer who preached a social gospel (a false gospel). Obviously this is public school generated traffic and white washed to appease blacks.

40. Miley Cyrus (21,724). Nerds.

41. Robert Pattinson (21,515). Not Pat Robertson? No, Wikipedia doesn’t want you to learn more about a false Christian and why he’s false. Instead it wants to cater and pander to Twlight obsessed emoMoron nerds like themselves. E-morons are not getting my $5 to learn about a pretty boy.

43. Twilight (2008 film) (21,158). Shallow nerds. It says a lot that Wikipedia attracts people who are into shedding blood and using violence to get there way and pretending to have super powers.

44. Windows 7 (21,018). Yawn. No where else in the universe can you learn about Windows 7 except Wikipedia? Try Annoyances.org. No doubt Jimmy Wales is friends with the ultimate nerd and pays to get that page in Google’s top five so that Bill Gates, a closet atheist (who wants the world’s population reduced to only what he considers the perfect special people), is put in a good light. I’d bet the people going to this page are W7-haters and elderly people who rarely use a computer and looking for info on them.

45. House (TV series) (20,882). No five.

46. Terminator Salvation (20,743). Nerds.

47. Kristen Stewart (20,538). Nerds.

48. Internet Movie Database (20,422). What? Dumb.

49. 2012 (20,347). New Age nerds : )

50. X-Men Origins: Wolverine (20,150). Ultra nerds.

51. Penis (20,076). Sad. I’m sure this is a page popular with sociopaths and psychopaths.

52. List of Presidents of the United States (19,884). Public school fodder. A clever way to draw in kids to Wikipedia and to get them to trust Wikipedia as a reliable source of info, including the Big Bang, abiogensis, and evolution pages. Evil.

53. List of sex positions (19,876). Ultimate nerd and new age grannies fodder. This page I bet links to India too, which would cause India to have higher traffic than many other pages and countries.

54. Masturbation (19,730). N.E.R.D.S., and kids.

55. William Shakespeare (19,714). Emo and narcissist fodder. Jesus should at least be here.

63. Wikipedia About Page (18,803). WOW. Six million+ people a year go to learn the Jimmy Wales invented Wikipedia fantasy and that Wikipedia is mostly free of bias it’s atheists claim. No five, for wasting time.

64. New York City (18,251). The mecca or narcissist/dandies, liberals, atheists, and the avaricious.

67. Henry VIII of England (17,912). Because atheists need to find dirt about the funder of the King James Bible. “Did you know HVIII was a homosexual you fundies!? Therefore the KJV is bad and God doesn’t exist and the KJV shouldn’t be read and Christianity fails.” Atheist logic = roach poop.

76. China (16,935). Wow never heard of China. Gotta go to Wikipedia to learn… oh: Chinese going to read about themselves. Probably public school fodder too. No doubt anti-communists and conservatives wondering what the atheist liberals have to say about their atheist “one child for Chinese citizens only or we’ll kill your extra kid and sterilize you” brethren.

77. American Idol (16,728). Booooooooring.

78. MySpace (16,240). Super boring.

79. France (16,198). Bleah.

80. Metallica (16,110). Nerds trying to be cool by swinging their heads up and down with long hair and shutting out the world with earphones and pretending to play the drums. Really sad and really anti-social.

82. List of Family Guy episodes (15,961). Massive conniving atheist nerd fail. Where’s South Park? I guess it would be too embarrassing for atheists to frequent a page about paper cut outs babbling childish nonsense? Pathetic.

83. Bleach (manga) (15,947). But not Hentai? I’m sure in a few years Hentai will pop up in the top 100.

84. Russia (15,674). Same as China: learn elsewhere. Wait, the Russians must be googling, “What does helve Westerners think ehbout Russia, what say them on wooorld’s most poopular ensickcloopedia?”

85. Mickey Rourke (15,616). Sounds familiar.

86. Jonas Brothers (15,561). Gay nerds?

87. Vietnam War (15,306). Public school fodder, college fodder, Vietnamese and American veterans and their family doing fact-checking. no doubt to me.

88. Kim Kardashian (15,213). What? Not Kim Jong Il?

89. Lost (season 5) (15,107). Atheist and liberals are truly lost.

90. Selena Gomez (15,086). Get a life. She’s dead. I wonder how many Mexicans make up the traffic to that page.

91. Wolverine (comics) (15,062). Lol nerds.

92. Family Guy (15,013). This again? Talk about obsessed.

93. Valentine’s Day (14,924). Huh… I wonder why nerds are so interested in this day… oh, never mind. I can just imagine, “We’ll you see my nerd blow up doll girlfriend, this isn’t really a day that needs to be celebrated because it’s really a Catholic thing, and look how much people spend on this day to give silly gifts. See, it’s all about making money, so we can safely ignore this day.”

94. Hotmail (14,880). Holy nerd fest.

95. The Dark Knight (film) (14,782). Ultra nerd fest.

96. America’s Next Top Model (14,752). So sad, nerds have no life.

97. Mexico (14,709). Nerds wishing to escape to the greener grass on the other side, dreaming of seducing an ignorant poor chica. I wonder if there’s such thing as Mexican brides.

98. Batman (14,654). Classic nerd icon.

99. List of Heroes episodes (14,652). *Shakes head.* No five.

100. Pornography (14,650). Of course: the ultimate atheist liberal kids-looking-for-easy-porn nerd food. I wonder if Hentai is somewhere in there.

How are atheists and liberals supposed to be more informed about Christianity and religion then Christians when no where in these top 100 is anything about religion, not even about the worlds biggest religions, not even Catholicism, not even the Bible or most popular Bible verse, “Do to others as you’d have them do to you,” or “mistakes in the Bible” even, and not even EVOLUTION! Not DARWIN, NOT CARL SAGAN, NOT MICHIO KAKU, not the word “atheist” or “Big Bang” or “arguments against religion.” And only two wars (no doubt atheists looking for something to blame theists on too) but not the Crusades which atheists love to use as a sole top example of why not to be religious (talk about simple-minded and not reasoning)? WIKIPEDIA IS AWESOME: because it is useful for showing what is on the mind of non-Christians and anti-Christians, even the rest of the world (which no doubt to me parallels the English world’s fixations and idols). It shows atheists, liberals, anti-Christians and the world in general is NOT scholarly, is not more interested in what matters most in life, but rather, temporary pleasure fixes, what kids and silly females and boys are interested in for the moment. Tis is what the atheists loons, nerds with no life, and liberals attract with Widgetpedia: Shallow morons, narcissists, kids, teens, recluses, fanboys and fangirls, in other words, stupid people, shallow people, ignorant people, those curious about what liberals have to say about pop culture figures and idolaters/man-worshipers. What a whopping massive monster of a fail. But of course, it’s not a fail in that atheists have managed to put a somewhat fun and professional face on the chaotic, warped, morbid mass-murder-filled face of atheism, and the atheists who pretend that atheism = “this life now matters most (meaning their life, not yours)” rather than simply meaning “no belief in God or gods.” But again, a fail: because Wikipedia’s information content would have had to have come mostly from theists, since atheists only make up 4% of the world by some estimates, and there is no way it’s more than 10%, and there’s no evidence that atheists contribute more information than theists. It’s the crazy shattered-mirror reflection of the combined faces of the atheists and liberals in control of Wikipedia.

It’s a satisfying feeling to know Wikipedia’s bandwidth is being drained away on stupidity. Hopefully one day an EMP will disable that monster propaganda machine, or God will take it over.

Why ‘sophisticated’ cavemen were not so different to us
from the DailyMail.co.uk
3/2520115:43 PM

Cavemen were far more sophisticated than their dimwitted reputation suggests, a leading archaeologist claims.

Professor John J Shea says evidence of early humans’ weapons, symbols and burials 195,000 years ago shows they had more in common with us than we like to think.

He claims Homo sapiens emerged all at once, ‘not as modern-looking people first and as a modern-behaving people later.’

Professor Shea, of Stony Brook University, New York, started researching ‘behavioral variability’ in 2002 after excavating a 195,000-year-old site in Ethiopia.

‘Nothing about the stone tools … struck me as archaic or primitive,’ he wrote in his article, Refuting a Myth About Human Origins, published by American Scientist magazine.

‘We need to discard an incorrect and outdated idea about human evolution, the belief that prehistoric Homo sapiens can be divided into “archaic” and “modern” humans.’ [NO: YAH THINK?] You’re about 6,500 years late. Anti-Christians sure are stubborn. You tell them 34,000,000 times God made us intelligent from the start, 6,500 years ago, show them the evidence in every direction they look, and after 34,000,000 years of ignoring that they finally evolve to say, “Eureka! We just found out our fathers weren’t as stupid as we thought!” Why not just say, “Nanny nanny boo boo we can’t hear you, oh look what we found, all on our own, but ur still wrong, and we’re still right, we’re the scientists, ur not, hahaha.”? It’s not like your followers would reject that either, being that they deeply hate God and his children (meaning: those he loves). And how interesting: Only 34 people commented on that article and it’s already been a day. Just goes to show how resistant evolutionists are to truth, even when their science leaders give a sliver of it to them. You’re turned people into monsters you Mainstreamers. That includes you news propagandists and hate-profiteers who support them, like Wikipedia, Encyclopedia Brittanica, National Geographic, Livescience, Sciencedaily, Physorg, Discovery Networks, the BBC, Scientific American, Discover Magazine, Popular Science, the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Greenpeace and countless other myth machines.

Liberal ”science writer” Alicia Chang and some liberal sociologist named Peggy Giordano suggest “teen sex to reduce stress”, not the eternal peace that God offers or the relief in stress that results in obeying him, in other words, they suggest what God describes as one of the worst kinds of rebellion to relieve stress: fornication:

LOS ANGELES — There’s good news for parents who worry that their teenagers’ sex lives are affecting their school performance: A provocative new study has found that teens in committed relationships do no better or worse in school than those who don’t have sex.

The same isn’t true for teens who “hook up.” Researchers found that those who have casual flings get lower grades and have more school-related problems compared with those who abstain.

The findings, presented Sunday at a meeting of the American Sociological Association in Atlanta, challenge to some extent assumptions that sexually active teens tend to do poorer in school.

It’s not so much whether a teen has sex that determines academic success, the researchers say, but the type of sexual relationship they’re engaged in. Teens in serious relationships may find social and emotional support in their sex partners, reducing their anxiety and stress levels in life and in school.

“This should give some comfort to parents who may be concerned that their teenage son or daughter is dating,” said sociologist Peggy Giordano of Bowling Green State University, who had no role in the research. Teen sex is “not going to derail their educational trajectories,” she said. [More here]

Wow, how stupid: So parents don’t have to worry about grades if their teens have sex, well then teens should have sex! WHICH IS IT MORON: THEY DON’T HAVE TO WORRY IF THEY ARE IN A “SERIOUS” RELATIONSHIP OR IF THEY ARE HAVING SEX? WEASEL? CAN YOU BE CONSISTENT? And besides you talking like God’s word does not matter, which says not to have sex before marriage, not even to act sensual towards ANYONE before marriage, do yah think it might matter if the female gets pregnant? Are you stupid Alicia and to whomever reposted her liberal propaganda rant without speaking out against it? Parents not being worrying or control obsessed while not allowing their kids to do just whatever feels good, and their kids finding a good friend or friends, and a massager can also reduce stress; you don’t need to permit your kid to have sex before they are married for them to relieve stress.

The narcissist prizes attention, the psychopath is a sadist, the addict cares only for comfort and pleasure.

A true Christian seeks to conform to God's will; a self-centered man exalts his own will.

A logical man sees the universe and worships the Designer; an when an atheist sees it he resents his powerlessness, envies and scoffs.

To deny God's existence is to deny the existence of truth and right from wrong because without a God, right and wrong are simply opinions of imperfect beings and where they go when they die, who knows? What I mean by truth and right from wrong are the redundant terms, "absolute truth", "absolute good" and "absolute evil". So then, to deny the existence of God is neither logical nor moral.