An award of $57,000 in legal fees, in an employment case where the plaintiff recovered about $8,000 at trial and her lawyers sought some $360,000 in fees, was affirmed by a New Jersey appeals court.

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

An award of $57,000 in legal fees, in an employment case where the plaintiff recovered about $8,000 at trial and her lawyers sought some $360,000 in fees, was affirmed by a New Jersey appeals court.

“It is inexplicable to us how the amounts requested were accumulated given the factual circumstances behind the claim,” the Appellate Division said in Lema v. BTS Holdings, a per curiam decision issued Jan. 18.

The case was lodged by plaintiff Melissa Lema, who had worked as an overnight dispatcher for defendant BTS Holdings, a livery car service. According to the decision, Lema claimed that one of the drivers, an independent contractor, treated her inappropriately—via social media photos and messages, and by touching her shoulder and whispering in her ear—and that she reported the issue to a supervisor.

Lema was fired in late September 2014, after about three months on the job, and claimed in her suit that she was told that her services weren’t needed anymore and that she was terminated because she watched pornography while on the job.

Within days of her firing, she filed an action alleging retaliatory discharge. The suit also named BTS Holdings’ owner, Craig Lax, seeking punitive damages based on Lema’s claim that it was Lax who made the decision to fire her. Lax contended that he was unaware of the situation.

Lema was represented by McOmber & McOmber in Red Bank.

The judge below was identified in electronic court records as Essex County Superior Court Judge Francine Schott, who oversaw a four-day trial in the case. The jury awarded $5,000 on Lema’s retaliation claim and $2,983 for lost wages, according to the decision.

Schott dismissed the claim against Lax, finding that a lone alleged statement from Lema’s supervisor that Lax was behind the firing was not enough to keep him in the case.

Based on the Law Against Discrimination’s fee-shifting provision, the McOmber firm sought $360,588 in fees and $82,83 in costs. Schott deemed the request excessive in what she called a “relatively straightforward” case, reduced the lodestar from $240,392 to $135,843, and also discounted some of the costs. She also included a downward adjustment of 60 percent, though she did add a 5 percent contingency enhancement. In all, the firm was awarded $57,054 in fees and $5,367 in costs.

On appeal, the McOmber firm contended that the fees sought were reasonable, and that Schott unfairly reduced the award.

“We see no reason why there should have been so many attorneys present in the courtroom during the course of trial,” the court said in the unpublished decision. “That seems to be entirely unnecessary duplication of effort in a fairly straightforward case.”

“Lema’s counsel called two witnesses,” the panel said. “Defendants had offered Lema substantially more than she recovered by way of settlement. The court took this appropriate consideration into account in making the allowance.”

Also at issue on appeal: The McOmber firm twice moved for Schott to recuse herself based on what they claimed were bias and disparaging comments toward the plaintiff, the first of those motions coming after a pretrial settlement conference. But Schott denied the motions. The appeals court did acknowledge an “arguably less than ideal” demeanor to counsel on both sides, but it affirmed the denials, saying that Schott “exhaustively explained her off-the-record comments, made in the hopes of reaching a settlement, as triggered by the weaknesses in Lema’s case, and she also indicated to defense counsel the weaknesses in their case.”

The court also affirmed Schott’s dismissal of the punitive damages claim against Lax. The panel said Lema failed to establish, under the standard set out in the state Supreme Court’s 1995 opinion in Rendine v. Pantzer, “actual participation in, or willful indifference to,” the conduct at issue, or proof that the conduct was “especially egregious.”

R. Armen McOmber of the McOmber firm, who argued the appeal, declined to comment.

David Gialanella

David Gialanella, Bureau Chief, has been with the New Jersey Law Journal since 2010, covering business of law, litigation, legislation and various other topics. In his current role, he is responsible for the Law Journal's print and web products. Reach him at dgialanella@alm.com.

Thrivest, which is one of three third-party lenders pursuing an appeal over the validity of several funding agreements they have with injured NFL players potentially entitled to settlement funds, filed an expedited motion to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on Tuesday.

Featured Firms

Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone

2 Oliver St #608

Boston,
MA02109

857-444-6468

www.marksalomone.com

Gary Martin Hays & Associates
P.C.

235 Peachtree St NE #400

Atlanta,
GA30303

800-898-4297

www.garymartinhays.com

Smith & Hassler

225 N Loop W #525

Houston,
TX77008

(877) 777-1529

www.smithandhassler.com

Presented by BigVoodoo

More from ALM

Premium Subscription

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.

Team Accounts

Our Team Account subscription service are for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.

Bundle Subscriptions

Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both option are priced the same.

From Data to Decisions

Exclusive Depth and Reach.

Legal Compass includes access to our exclusive industry reports, combining the unmatched expertise of our analyst team with ALM’s deep bench of proprietary information to provide insights that can’t be found anywhere else.

Big Pictures and Fine Details

Legal Compass delivers you the full scope of information, from the rankings of the Am Law 200 and NLJ 500 to intricate details and comparisons of firms’ financials, staffing, clients, news and events.

KAHN GORDON TIMKO & RODRIQUES, P.C.

NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters.
Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss.
Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.