“Mohammed Sidique Khan: Are you really a terrorist eh?
Omar Khyam: They’re working with us.
Mohammed Sidique Khan: You’re serious, you are basically…
Omar Khyam: No I’m not a terrorist but they are working through us.”

An Historical Context – Within the War on Terror.

On July 7th , 2005 the public transport system in London was struck by a number of explosions that killed 56 people and wounded hundreds more causing the largest single loss of life in Britain since World War 2.

The July 7th bombings formed and continue to form a key part of the War on Terror narrative. Of the dozens, indeed hundreds of mass casualty attacks attributed to the “al Qaeda” synthetic terror outfit in the first decade of the 21st century the London attacks along with the 911 events, the Bali bombings, the Madrid attacks of 2004 and the Mumbai massacre of 2008 stand out as the “iconic” attacks that are still utilised to promote the War on Terror narrative of foreign wars and the domestic police state whilst many other massacres such as the attack in Djerba, Tunisia in March 2002, and the series of blasts that struck Istanbul in late 2003 have been largely forgotten.

Historian Webster Tarpley in his 2004 work “911 Synthetic Terror Made in the USA”” provides an analysis of the phenomenon of modern terrorism that explains why all events of world changing political violence should be subjected to intense scrutiny.

“We start from the strong presumption that terrorism is therefore an activity which is controlled by a faction of government, probably acting under the influence of financier factions which are generally the ultimate source of authority in the globalized universe after 1991. Terrorism cannot be described as a spontaneous sociological phenomenon, as the old saying goes – it must rather be seen as a phenomenon developed by sociologists, along with psychologists, profilers, psychiatrists, case officers, handlers, and cut-outs. For every terrorist and terrorist group in the field, an extensive bureaucratic support system is necessary. Spontaneous combustion is the last thing that should be expected.”

How reassuring to open the ISC account and be greeted with news about the weather

“2. “7 July began unsettled, with heavy showers in places. The early morning rush in London started as normal.”

The reader continues to find that the report provides no specific details about the actual attacks. The timing, placement, composition of the bombs. Nothing beyond the broad speculative claim and the circular argument that the designated offenders must have conducted the attack because it happened and we said so.

The high degree of success achieved by the British Establishment appears to have rendered them so acutely out of touch and completely unable to tell quality lies due to their complete lack of respect for their intended audience.whom they clearly regard with unvarnished contempt.

The aftermath in Omagh, the Police Ombudsman found that “intelligence had been withheld” but “nothing could have been done to prevent the attack.” This appears to be a nonsensical claim.

An Historical Context. Within modern British and history.

There is an obvious connection between the July 7th attacks and the other al Qaeda “spectaculars” the attack is also part of a pattern of manufactured terror in the UK that has been underway for at least half a centur.

While there are many parallels between the London attacks and the 911, Madrid and other attacks, there are also close parallels with previous major atrocities in Britain including the Birmingham Pub bombings of 1974 and the Omagh blast in Ireland in 1998.

An uncomfortable truth lurks in the background of all these events. The Security Services are naturally enough self interested. They want a big budget and large staff the same as any other Government agency. The only difference is that their institutional wellbeing depends on the preponderance of fear. They are quite simply in the business of fear.

The budget for MI5, GCHQ and MI6 combined stands at just under 2 billion pounds per annum. The Guardian estimates that MI5 share f the 1.92 billion pound combined intelligence budget at 900 million pounds. The budget had been expected to decline after the 2012 Olympics but happily Jihad John and the other synthetic IS monsters sorted that out nicely and anticipated budget cuts were averted.

Map shows the attacks as outlined in the fficial narrative in central London.

The Official Story of 7/7.
The official story of the 7/7 bombings comprises the Home Office narrative, two Intelligence and Security Committee reports and the Coroner’s Inquest. These accounts differ on many details but there is a consensus amongst them that 3 British Muslims collected bombs from a Leeds flat, drove to Luton where they met their Jamaican British comrade and caught a train to London where they dispersed and conducted suicide bomb attacks against four civilian targets on the morning of July 7th, 2005.
The attacks we are told targeted 3 trains almost simultaneously at around 8.50am followed by an attack on a Double Decker bus almost an hour later at 9.47am.

Because the witness and media accounts of the event are deeply contradictory and incoherent and the event took place outside the public view and the evidence has been tightly controlled by the British Government the 7/7 case is a complex and difficult and although there are several facts that logically render the account of the event provided by the British Government null and void, this case does not provide the simple seven second smoking gun that the destruction of WTC 7 provides in the 911 case.

It is necessary therefore to expose the truth by interrogating the Official story and analysing it critically rather than pointing at any one piece of visual evidence such as the WTCdemolitions.

The best way to describe the Home Office narrative and the reports of the ISC is insulting. These narratives quite simply fail to present evidence in support of numerous key assertions. It is not a serious attempt to investigate the incident at all.

The ISC Reports based on information provided to the Intelligence and Security Committee from MI5 contain numerous untruths regarding knowledge of the identity of Mohammed Sidique Khan with MI5 having delivered three different, contradictory and provably untrue accounts of their knowledge of Khan.

Along with a whole host of “Keystone Cops” explanations for their failure t identify Khan when he had been on their radar and under surveillance sporadically for several years. The West Yorkshire Police field the brunt of the blame predictably.

The very terms of the Coroner’s Inquest speak volumes. Despite the clear stipulation that the Coroner should investigate the cause of death in all cases of sudden and violent death in Britain, the cause of death of the four bombers was outside the Coroner’s purview for unknown reasons.

In addition, none of the victims were subjected to an internal post mortem examination to help determine the exact cause of death despite this being standard procedure.

The four accused London perpetrators Hasib Husain , Germaine Lindsay, Shezhad Tanweer and Mohammed Sidique Khan from left to right.

Lifting the veil.

It remains unclear how many bombs were detonated, the composition of the devices, the means of detonation, the nature of the events remains a startling mystery in many ways with many strange indications such as that there may have been incidents on more than four trains and the extremely strange multiple eyewitness accounts that described a sensation they described as electrocution at the time of the detonations.

“You know that kind of pppvvvvvv type of sound, but a
million times more powerful.’8 He also told the Cambridge Evening
News that, ‘It was like a huge electricity surge which knocked us out and
burst our eardrums. I can still hear that sound now.’9 For her part,
Crystal Main told the Mirror that, ‘all of a sudden I felt as if I was having
a fit and couldn’t control myself. I slipped to the side. It was as if I had
been electrocuted and thousands of volts were going through me.”

The alleged ringleader of the group was a well liked 30-year-old man from Leeds named Mohammed Sidique Khan, (whose identity cards were remarkably found at three separate attack sites in the aftermath of the July 7th attacks) Mohammed Sidique Khan had been involved with militants in the UK and Pakistan for years. He was captured on surveillance attending a half-baked training camp in rural Britain in 2001, travelled twice to Pakistan and was observed in contact with numerous targeted militants between 2001 and 2005.

All of his key contacts, his mentors and trainers appear to have been operating on behalf of Western Intelligence Agencies with one US agent in a prominent role among a host of British assets and agents.
The milieu that Khan existed within for several years was littered with agents, informers and provocateurs.

Martin McDaid radical convert, claimed to be former SBS, probable infiltrator, it happened in Ireland….

Martin McDaid

There was the fellow named Martin McDaid, he was a supposed Muslim convert who claimed to be a former member of the elite British Special Forces unit the SBS and ran a militant bookshop in Leeds.. McDaid was the organiser and trainer at the British training camp. McDaid acted as a provocateur, a radicaliser. McDaid was never arrested or prosecuted or otherwise detained and has now disappeared. It is worth noting that a very senior IRA militant and British double agent named John Joe Magee was also a former SBS member. McDaid’s apparent role as”protected provocateur” was repeated with other key militants in the area at the time including a man named Mohammed Quayyum Khan.

If McDaid, Q and Babar were spies acting as part of a complex
covert operation or set of operations then it would be important to
obscure their connections to the four people who were designated to
become ‘suicide bombers’. Every time the alleged bombers did
something that could later be used to make them look like suicide
bombers, they did it through or via one of the probable spies. Every
time, the connections between the four and the probable spy or spies
was obscured by security service intelligence failures

Mohammed Junaid Babar ran the training camp in Malakand Pakistan. Wrked for the US government. MI5 prevented him identifying Tanweer and Khan by sending the butchered photo of the two to the Americans.

Mohammed Junaid Babar US Government Agent and the Trainer..

Mohammed Junaid Babar was a US citizen from a Pakistani background who travelled to Pakistan soon after 911 and began mouthing off about wanting to kill Americans. It seems clear that Babar was sent to Pakistan by a US agency in order to deliver war propaganda to the American people and was later deployed as an informant.

“By November 2001 he had arrived in Pakistan and he gave two interviews
to Western journalists proclaiming that, ‘When the American troops
enter, we will kill them in Afghanistan. There is no negotiation… I will kill
every American that I see in Afghanistan and while I am in Pakistan, if I
see them in Pakistan, I will kill every American soldier I can in
Pakistan.”

Babar ran a supposed terrorist training camp in the Pakistan town of Malakand. This was the camp that alleged leader of the 7/7 cell Mohammed Siddique Khan attended during his 2003 visit to Pakistan.
In 2004 Mohammed Junaid Babar “came in from the cold” returned to the US where he was taken into custody and debriefed. The US government has stated that Babar was an US intelligence asset prior to his arrest but not the specific date he began working for them.

Babar’s sentencing hearing was told that Babar “worked for the US Government prior to his arrest.”
In custody in the US Babar described all his militant contacts and the US government tried to match the names Babar described with specific individuals.
Babar told the Americans about the young British men he encountered in the Malakand camp. He described Mohammed Sidique Khan, as a man he knew as “Sidique” so the US contacted British Intelligence to see if they could help Babar identify Mohammed Sidique Khan.

The manner of the response from British Intelligence to this request represents one of the single most damning facts in this case and proves unmistakably that MI5 colluded in order to protect Khan’s identity from the US.

Surveillance image of Shehzhad Tanweer and Mohammed Siddique Khan the image on the right shows what MI5 sent to the USA in order to protect Khan’s identity.

MI5 Concealed Khan and Tanweer from the US Government in March 2005.

It can be stated with a high degree of confidence that Mohammed Sidique Khan was some type of British Intelligence operative on the basis of multiple pieces of evidence but the most damning fact in relation to Khan’s status is probably the time in March 2005 when British Intelligence responded to an FBI request for information about the men who had been in the Malakand camp including a man named “Sidique” and MI5 CROPPED KHAN’S FACE from a photo they sent to the F.B.I along with butchering the image of Shehzad Tanweer also.

British intelligence had taken quite a good photograph featuring two members of the alleged 77 cell, Khan and Shehzhad Tanweer, covertly taken of the two at a roadside service centre in 2003.
So in March 2005, in the months prior to the London attacks, the US was interested in discovering “Sidique’s” specific identity, and asked the Brits for help in this matter and the people at MI5 sent the Americans a cropped black and white version of the original photograph.

This is a story from the mainstream media, the Mail and the Guardian. These facts only emerged many years after the events, as part of the Coroner’s Inquest into the deaths of the 52 “non bomber” victims of the attacks released in 2011..

The cropped image of Khan, was so poor that it
was not even shown to Babar by the FBI. The image of Tanweer was
almost as bad, and it is unsurprising that Babar did not know who he
was. Witness G was confronted during the inquests with this
comparison, with Hugo Keith QC commenting that, ‘G, I am bound to
observe, if you will forgive me, I think one of my children could havedone a better job of cropping out that photograph.’
MI5’s excuse for such a horrendous editing job was that, ‘thecropping is all to do with not revealing the techniques by which thephotograph was collected.’ The ability of security services to covertly
film and photograph people is not a secret, so this makes no sense
whatsoever. Witness G also referred to the need for speed in sending
the pictures to be seen by Babar, but this is also highly dubious. If the
purpose was to have the men in the picture identified then quickly
sending a poorly-cropped image to Babar that he did not identify should
have resulted in sending a better version to make sure.

This fact alone destroys the 7/7 “intelligence failure/ lack of resources” narrative as an insipid cover story.
Both photographs are in the public arena and their authenticity is undisputed and we are asked to believe that in the year 2005 MI5 did not possess a working printer, or a computer nor the ability to scan a photograph and Email it to the USA?

.British Intelligence try to claim that while they were aware of Khan they did not consider him a significant risk, This is a naked lie. Khan was their man and he was a man they sought to protect and there is simply no doubt about it.
This is one of the many classic signs of a false flag attack and recurs across many different attacks because as Webster Tarpley wrote “the patsies must be protected” if they are imprisoned they are no longer able to perform their role as the designated offender.

The fact that the British press expect their readers to buy the idea that MI5 were running around the office in the year 2005 cropping photos with SCISSORS speaks of their profound contempt for their readers Th
This attempt to prevent the US identifying Khan came less than a year prior to the London attack and on its own, even if the official story were legitimate proves outright the complicity of British Intelligence in the attack. The man they claim was the cell leader was the man they deliberately shielded from the US Government in the months before the attack.

This means that all of the circumstantial evidence presented against Khan can just as easily be explained by his attempting to establish his identity or “legend” as a “legitimate” jihadist volunteer in Malakand. It is entirely possible that Babar coerced Tanweer and Khan into making the video and they complied fearing exposure or ridicule. Khan’s status is only the front half of the story and Khan’s status as an agent does not preclude him from having gone rogue and conducted a genuine terror attack, but critical analysis of the evidence presented within the British Government narrative indicates that this is not the case.

Germaine Lindsay and Hasib Hussein.

It can be established that Khan was some type of Intelligence asset and Tanweer is assumed to have also been an asset and his identity was also obscured deliberately by MI5. It is possible that Tanweer was a dupe but the weight of evidence indicates otherwise.

Far less is known about the other two alleged perpetrators, Hasib Husain and Germaine Lindsay. Lindsay was married to Samantha Lewthwaite, a woman widelyalleged to be an intelligence asset, but even if this is the case this does not necessarily mean that Lindsay was not a sincere extremist. It is worth remembering that in order to infiltrate semi- militant environmental organisations British Intelligence allowed their agents to have children under their fake cover identities and this happened in several cases. So the fact that Lindsay was married to Lewthwaite could be read either way.

One strange detail about the attack attributed to Lindsay, the Piccadilly line attack was that it was so devastating by comparison with the others with the 26 victims representing half the total deaths from four attacks. Lindsay’s train bomb for some reason also killed double the other two train attacks combined.

Hasib Husain’s actions when he was recorded prior to his own 20 minute disappearance make no sense. The supposed fanatical mass killer dined at McDonald’s, he also tried to telephone the other alleged cell members repeatedly. If he knew what they were doing and that involved blowing themselves up why did he call them after the bombs had gone off?

If he really was an attacker and he somehow could not manage to get on a train, he would simply get in a crowded area and do the evil business. As if you are going to wander round waiting to find a bus to attack and risk capture or death and failure.

CCTV Image of the accused 7/7 bombers.

The Magical Disappearances.

Another among a number of devastating facts that are not contested and which destroy the British Government account of the July atrocities is the astonishing fact that none of the four designated offenders was filmed either boarding nor travelling on nor within 200 yards of the vehicle he was alleged to have attacked.

In addition all four men inexplicably disappeared from all CCTV footage 20 minutes prior to “conducting the attack” clearly marking this as the “moment of magic”, the time at which the sleight of hand that the real perpetrators used was undertaken.

The men appeared on CCTV as they drove from Leeds towards Luton. When Tanweer stopped at a service centre,and when the men arrived at Luton station, they were filmed each and every step of the way. At around 8.25am the men are seen walking through the Kings Cross station. At this point all three” 8.50 bombers” disappear.

The problem with the train CCTV was explained by the claim that for that period of time all the cameras in the CCTV system were set on only one camera view so the view from only one camera was seen.

This may have been plausible were it not for the fact that the alleged Bus bomber Hasib Husein who was filmed after the initial wave of attacks and attacked a different wing of the public transport system with a completely different CCTV system also miraculously disappeared for a full twenty minutes prior to the attack he is claimed to have conducted.

All of the cameras that showed the men travelling mundanely to London worked perfectly well but as soon as the men were required to take the actions that comprise the actual attack they disappear.

The simple fact that the Inquest into the event did not consider within its terms of reference the cause of death of the four alleged perpetrators, contrary to all British legal norms is another straightforward destroyer of the very notion that these events were conducted by the designated offenders, whose very bodies were apparently not even present at the scene on the day of the event and who, when apparently dumped at the bombing scene some 24 hours later were accompanied by the traditional false flag totem of the id card left helpfully on the ground.

Incredibly in the case of Mohammed Sidique Khan identifying documents were found at three separate bomb sites.

An official diagram depicts the strange pattern of casualties on the train attacked near Aldgate station.

The entire story of the home-made bombs is an almighty mess that is extremely short of evidence of any credibility.

Most of the supposed “bomb making” material at the “bomb factory” in Alexandra Grove was not explosive.

The details of the attack are terribly confused. There are however numerous accounts from eyewitnesses, including public officials that support the claim that the explosions took place underneath the carriages rather than within them.

There are accounts from several of the bomb sites that credibly describe holes in the floor blowing the floor of the train upwards and outwards.

Bruce Lait points to the spot in the carriage he saw a hole in the floor of the Aldgate train.

Bruce Lait says he saw a hole in the floor. In an interview with Cambridge
Evening News only days after the bombing he spoke of how they were
being helped off the bombed train by a policeman, ‘The policeman said
‘mind that hole, that’s where the bomb was’. The metal was pushed
upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. They seem to think
the bomb was left in a bag, but I don’t remember anybody being where
the bomb was, or any bag.’
“Years later, when Lait was interviewed for the BBC’s Conspiracy
Files show on 7/7 he reiterated all of this and pointed to the same area
where the MPS diagram says the explosion happened. Lait is number
18 in the diagram, one of the closest survivors, and therefore a
consistent and important witness. It appears the police took him
seriously when he said that’s where the explosion was, but not when he
said he doesn’t remember anyone, let alone Tanweer, standing there.”

The fact that so many of the basic details of the attacks. The composition of the bombs, the detonation method remain submerged beneath the studied inertia of what appears to be a classic cover up.

Peter Power.

Peter Power is a former Metropolitan Police officer in London and in 2005 he ran a “crisis management” firm named Visor Consultants. Power has many sinister historical connections and acts as an unofficial spokesman for the British National Security State. In 2011 Power appeared on the BBC commenting n the security procedures surrounding the funeral of the recently deceased former British PM Margaret Thatcher. Power also participated in the Panorama episode of 2004 that closely anticipated the 7/7 events with identical train attacks but a different attack, a chlorine truck bomb- on the road.

The Panorama episode is certainly interesting as were Power’s interviews on the day of the events.

Ultimately, Power is a minor person of interest in this case, along with Reed Elsevier, the company who employed him on the day.but the simulation is not necessarily damning or even relevant because there was no real on the ground drill as far as we know.

If you listen closely to the Power interviews, the infamous interviews,it is perfectly clear that Power is describing a simulated event in a room not an actual training drill involving operatives on the ground.

The whole point of a “false flag” drill is that it gives the plotters an opportunity to move the elements of the attack into place under the cover of the drill and use the drill as an excuse if they are caught.

British Intelligence- A Pattern of Behaviour.
In all probability the explosives were from the British “Gladio” stocks or similar clandestine cache and one of the surprising things that looking at this case has taught me is that British Intelligence have been deeply enmeshed in most, indeed possibly all of the major terror attacks and terror groups that have operated in the UK in the post World War II era.
The IRA themselves were a synthetic terror outfit and it appears that atrocities were committed by Government agencies during the years of the troubles and the attacks were blamed on Irish people living in Britain who were innocent of the crimes.

Fake confessions were produced by torture and beatings, often the innocent patsies were later released from prison and exonerated but the true perpetrators of many of the worst attacks of the “Troubles” were never prosecuted. The crimes remain unsolved in many cases for reasons that are obvious.

Birmingham 1974.

In 1974 MI5 had one agent among the four man “rogue IRA” cell who conducted the attacks which left 21 people dead. MI5 had information from their informant regarding the attacks, the date and the targets but chose not to share the information with local police for unknown reasons.

At this point it is clear that despite the sincerity of many of their volunteers, the IRA were a vehicle for British Intelligence under their control to a greater or lesser extent throughout the Troubles and beyond. It is also worth remembering that British Intelligence were effectively infiltrating both sides of the Northern Irish conflict and directing both sides towards self discrediting atrocities in order to maintain British power in Northern Ireland in a classic example of the “Strategy of Tension.”

In one memorable case, British Intelligence directed a Protestant death squad in the murder of Patrick Finucane a Lawyer with no militant involvement in front of his family as they sat down to eat their evening meal. Such tactics were clearly designed to cause the people to reject both the Protestant paramilitary groups and the IRA and presumably embrace the Government of Britain.

Omagh 1998.

The Synthetic nature of Irish republican and Loyalist terror did not end when the troubles wound down following the Good Friday peace agreement of the early 1990s.

When a tiny IRA splinter group chose to continue with the atrocities after the peace deal and detonated a devastating device in Omagh in August 1998 it later emerged that British Intelligence had known of the plot months in advance but had chosen not to share the information about the cell and the impending attack with the police because they did not want to expose their assets working within the tiny terror group.

“Should we be denied truth and justice because other people don’t want it?” he told Sky News. “The reality is that Aiden need not have died. Both the British and Irish governments failed to protect the human rights of those people.” Some of the bereaved families have handed the government an independent report which they claim shows alleged intelligence failings by the authorities in the run-up to the attack.”

Surely if MI5 were engaged in a sincere counter-terrorism effort they would realise that the entire reason to infiltrate these groups should be to prevent such atrocities and these are exactly the times you would conduct a sting and end the entire operation if you were sincere. But time and again it clear that the intent is to manage the group, never to actually destroy it or prevent bad things happening. Quite the opposite,

The Kincora Boys home in 1982. BBC photo.

Kincora Boys Home- MI5’s Bellast Boy Brothel for Blackmail.

Anyone in any doubt as to just how cynical and wicked are the operations of the apparently innocuous British internal intelligence agency, need only look at the story of the Kincora Boys Home in Belfast, a site from which MI5 facilitated the trafficking and abuse of numerous children by the local and British elite using the most unscrupulous imaginable means to leverage and manipulate all parties to the conflict in Northern Ireland and any other senior figures with unfortunate predilections t be harnessed and exploited.

Kincora served the elite of the British military and Northern Ireland and politics alike, the place functioned as a boy brothel designed to facilitate black mail, the child rape was simply a means to an end this was merely one of many techniques used to control all parties during the Troubles.

These operations were by no means confined to Northern Ireland and the Elm Guest House in London played a similar role as Kincora in London in the early 1980’s and it appears that the Dolphin Square flats near Westminster were used for similar purposes more recently

One of many Rogue Agencies.

In fairness it should be noted that the F.B. I have played a similarly sinister and wicked role in post war life in the United States. It is no exaggeration to describe the F.B.I. As the predominant terrorist group operating in the United States over the past several decades, their role mirrors that of MI5 and if anything the evidence of their involvement in events such as the 1993 World Trade Centre Bombings, Oklahoma City and many other atrocities is even more damning than the case against MI5.

All Roads Lead to MI5.

It can be stated with confidence that the attacks of July 7th were not conducted by suicide bombers, witting or otherwise although it remains possible that one or more of the individuals blamed for the attacks were sincere terrorists.
It is clear that the four men had been for years enmeshed in a web of Islamic Militants that appeared to be under the control and direction of British Intelligence.

The truth can be discerned by reading the inexplicable missing pieces of evidence that can only be explained by deception and the concealment of criminality.

It appears as though Mohammed Sidique Khan is a sincere individual sent to infiltrate potential terror cells. It would be unfair to describe him as an agent, he seems more like a well meaning volunteer.

Khan was a respected member of the community who helped sort out gang disputes. Infiltrating potential terror cells in order to prevent an attack and protect the name of British Muslims appears to fit Khan’s character far more than the supposed suicidal terrorist.

That Khan was some type of asset, a protected species is beyond dispute. This does not preclude him from “going rogue” and conducting an attack. There is at least one recent seemingly authentic example of this in the Pakistani Taliban/Jordanian Intelligence and CIA asset Humam Khalil Abu-Mulal al-Balawi blew up a bunch of CIA people in a suicide attack, so it is possible.

This is where the complete lack of CCTV footage, the inexplicable disappearances of all four men twenty minutes prior to the attack fro which they are blamed becomes truly powerful and helpful as it fills in the gap in the story. If Khan had truly gone rogue and the attacks were authentic suicide bombings we would not have the magical CCTV disappearances.

On their own, these do not really prove anything but when you combine the cropped photograph, the sabotaged identification with the CCTV disappearances, the infiltrated character of the Leeds milieu, the history of the IRA and Protestant miltants being manipulated, the pattern of bomb damage and the complete lack of credible witnesses who described seeing any of the men on any of the targets, the only logical conclusion is that the men were abducted and the bombs were remotely detonated. It seems fairly clear that both Tanweer and Khan were some type of intelligence assets as Shehzad Tanweer’s identification by Babar was also sabotaged by MI5, albeit less obviously than in the case of Khan.

A Very Tentative Hypothesis.

I do not know precisely what happened in London on Uly the 7th 2005. I am not claiming that this scenario is accurate, it is simply the best explanation with the available evidence at this time in my opinion.

It is entirely possible that evidence will emerge that proves this hypothesis incorrect, but this is the best explanation hypothesis.

So it almost seems as though the two agents, Khan and Tanweer perhaps recruited one or two willing and/or semi-willing extremists in one or both of Germaine Lindsay and Hasib Husain as part of a sting operation.

In order to make the sting operation as dramatic as possible, the men were to go through the motions of conducting a real attack but the bombs would be detonators without any actual explosives, like the 21/7 operation. A work of true brilliance that cemented the suicide bombers narrative in the public mind and served as wonderful protection for the rather brazen 7/7 deception.

Unlike 21/7 the men were all to be arrested upon arrival in London and for their own protection, Khan and Tanweer were in this scenario arrested alongside Lindsay so that Lindsay will not know they set him up.. It is unclear why Hasib Husein was apparently arrested around 40 minutes after the other three designated offenders.

At the point the men are arrested the sting morphed into a black operation. The men are murdered in custody and their bodies are later dumped at the bomb site. The bombs were presumably military explosives detonated remotely after being hidden within the train carriages.

This scenario is based only on informed speculation and until MI5 are made accountable for their actions the truth will never emerge because while it remains entirely unclear who conducted the London atrocities of 2005, there is simply no doubt that MI5 have not been honest in this matter, they know the truth behind these attacks and all logic and available evidence indicate that these were not authentic Islamist terror attacks or suicide bombings as they and the rest of the British Government dogmatically assert..

It is also clear that whomever may have been responsible, all roads lead to MI5, and there can be little doubt that they know who was really responsible for these heinous atrocities whomever they may be.

Almost all of the evidence presented here is a distilled version of Tom Secker’s authoritative work Secrets, Spies and 7/7 the most comprehensive account of these events that was available and for which I am immensely grateful and heavily indebted. None of that is to suggest that Mr. Secker endorses one word of this piece. (other than the extensive Secker quotes obviously! )

In Yemen a series of attacks have murdered an estimated 137 people as at least three mosques of the Shia Zaydi branch of the Houthis. Senior political and military figures were successfully targeted it appears.

An alleged suicide bomber has also attacked a Shia mosque in the Saudi city of al Qatif today murdering at least nineteen people as they worshipped at Friday prayers. Presumably bothe the Islamic State and an al Qaeda branch will claim responsibility.

The “Islamic State” (or in this case ISIL) is predictably claiming the lot although the verification of these claims will never be provided.

There seem to be several alternative explanations for this tragedy.
There is a possibility, in my opinion a very remote one that the criminal House of Saud security forces allowed their jihadist allies to attack the despised and restive Shia.

This makes no sense. The situation in al Qatif has been tense for some time as the embedded video shot around six weeks ago in the same area as today’s attack makes clear.

Another alternative would be an “authentic” terror attack conducted by the Takfiri jihadists in an attempt to start a sectarian war in Saudi Arabia that they will capitalise on to pounce upon the war weakened House of Saud and overthrow it, along with Jordan, as the plot requires Israel to be surrounded as much as possible by “Islamic” extremists. In order to make World War 3 as violent and plausible and complete as possible in the Middle East.
Jordan with it’s current Government, insipid in every way as it is, cannot be credibly nuked in the Armageddon event.

Citizen of Eastern Saudi Arabia mourns for a dead family member in the wake of the atrocity.

Both the House of Saud and the Hashemites in Jordan are Doomed.

Soon, very soon, the jihadists are going to be turned loose in Saudi Arabia and Jordan The timeline is unclear but this will happen. It may fail but there will be a massive push against both. All the resources that were used against Syria and Iraq will be used against them and they will be helpless. An al Qaeda franchise group, such as the al Nusra front will likely be the next Saudi government.

The Shia areas of Saudi Arabia will within years likely become a state within the state, another Iraqi Kurdistan or Eastern Syria.

The original Osama bin laden, Western agent provocateur par excellence. Died in late 2001.

The Deaths of Osama bin Laden.

May 12th, 2015.

Osama bin Laden Appears to Have Died in 2001.

The US Government and the controlled media claim that Osama bin Laden was killed in a US raid on his Pakistan hideout in 2011. It is a difficult matter to prove given these events are cloaked in lies and disinformation but overwhelming evidence indicates that Osama bin Laden, CIA agent provocateur par excellence, died in Afghanistan in December 2001 and all of the events involving bin Laden and all the statements he supposedly made after 2001 were entirely fake.
When you look at the videos of some of the post 2001 bin Laden appearances it is quite clear that bin laden is being impersonated, crudely and poorly. That fact combined with multiple reports of bin Laden’s death in 2001, in the US. Pakistani and Egyptian press indicates that bin Laden died but lived on in impersonation and myth and the operation that supposedly killed bin laden in Abbottobad Pakistan on May 1st, 2011 was in whole or part a work of fiction.

Benazir Bhutto says Osama Bin Laden is Dead?

In addition to the reports two completely separate Pakistani political figures, Pervez Musharref and Benazir Bhutto also stated that Osama bin laden was dead long before 2011, Bhutto even claimed to know the identity of the person who she claimed killed bin Laden, describing the death as a murder at the hands of Ahmed Saeed Sheikh Omar, a British man with links to al Qaeda, British MI6 and the Pakistani ISI.

It appears that an US military operation took place in Abbottabad in 2011, that it involved Navy Seals and it was designed to kill the dangerous myth of Osama bin Laden. It was a lie that killed a lie.

There were bin laden fakes-plural employed after 2001, these appear to be three different fake bin Ladens from What Really Happened.

A Ridiculous Story.

Helpfully, the Military and political accounts of the operation are completely ridiculous. The man who was blamed for the September 11th massacre was supposedly killed without a single photograph being taken of him prior to his burial at sea!

There was never any actual evidence offered that Osama bin Laden was either present in Abbottabad nor that he was killed. There was just a story.

Elated Americans cheer the death of bin laden ten years late.

A Wildly Successful Hoax that like Boston brought cheering crowds to the streets.

It was an extremely successful hoax that saw cheering crowds throng outside the White House, I had no idea of the truth and was personally very pleased which is obviously very embarrassing but ultimately this was a hoax that actually served a relatively good cause, the killing of the myth was dishonest and low but the myth was dangerous. Telling the truth would of course have been the right thing to do, it has become clear that this is not a realistic expectation to have of any part of the US government.
The actual operation is very confusing, the apparent helicopter crash, the question of who if anyone was even there. It’s a mess.

A really obvious fake bin Laden from 2007. Wrong everything.

Bin laden and 911.

We know that Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda did not conduct the 911 attacks.But did they plan the planes operation only to see the “professionals” step in and blow the buildings up after flying empty drones into them or was the whole thing a work of fiction?

This is an important question without an answer. The al Qaeda group was so compromised and openly used by so many different intelligence agencies that it is almost impossible to determine whether there was any sincere al Qaeda planes operation plot. There was a fellow named Ramzi bin al Shibh, in Germany who was in contact with Mohammed Atta and appears to have assisted in preparations for an operation. He may have been the person closest to the operation who was sincere.

The other problem is that the media coverage of al Qaeda was so completely dishonest and fictional that even when it makes sense that an individual actually believed he was planning the planes operation, it is quite likely the entire account is a complete lie.

The North Tower Demolition, September 11th, 2001.

Ramzi bin al Shibh and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed appeared to take responsibility for planning the operation in an interview with al Jazeera in 2002. The interview may well be authentic or it may simply be a work of fiction. None of the tapes the written interview is said to be based upon have ever been released.

With Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the fact that he bothered to refuse to talk to the Americans for a long time despite being tortured severely tends to indicate his probable sincerity.

A photograph of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed from 2007 approx.

Would the Americans invent the 183 water boardings in a single month? Maybe. It is entirely possible that these two al Qaeda figures sincerely plotted the attacks, but neither man ever set foot in the USA or played any active part in the attacks. The attack may have been real or authentic in Pakistan or Afghanistan or even in Germany, but absolutely everything that took place in the US was under the control of Westerners and the fake al Qaeda terrorists who did enter the United States such as Mohammed Atta were undoubtedly not sincere and no element of the attacks is authentic and the planes operation did not take place.

As far as bin Laden goes, he appears to have been aware of his provocateur role. There is no evidence that bin laden played even the theoretical role the likes of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Ramzi bin al Shibh may have played.

Alleged photo of Ramzi bin al Shibh who may have thought he was actually planning 911 from Hamburg, he wasn’t.

Summary.

As far as Osama bin Laden goes the truth is pretty clear.
There were multiple reports of his death in late 2001.
There are numerous problems with the post 2001 bin Ladens that indicate an actor (indeed series of actors) were playing the bin Laden role.
The story from the US that bin Laden was killed and they never took a photograph of the corpse or any other part of the operation is completely unrealistic. If they kill him you can guarantee there will be many mementos and proof of what they have done. They would be perfectly proud and happy to show a picture of his bloodied corpse.
The only photos that were claimed to depict the death of bin laden were photo-shopped stills from the movie Black Hawk Down! They didn’t even make an effort.

As far as why Seymour Hersh is pushing his longstanding and rather half baked interpretation at this time?
Seymour Hersh is a high quality Establishment journalist. Seymour Hersh wrote in 2002 that elements of the US government believed that a foreign Intelligence agency must have been involved but he never followed the story up nor sought the immense corroboration available.

Years ago Seymour Hersh stated that not one detail of the raid was correct, which was right, but now he is actually asserting that much of the story is true including the all important fact that Osama bin Laden was actually killed which is nonsense.

The few sane and rational elements of the US administration appear to be under siege and appear to be caving and losing all over the place and something the administration has done has presumably pissed off one of Seymour Hersh handlers enough to cause this story to happen.

The controlled media report the faux second death of Osama bin Laden.

The Empire Strikes Back?

The tentative Iran deal appears to have prompted a massive and successful Zionist fightback in Washington and in Syria and in Ukraine the forces of chaos and mayhem in the US government have clearly seized the initiative and are setting the conditions for several possible massive future US wars and it actually seems that the War party are desperately trying to finish off Assad in order to drive a wedge , a violent wedge between the US and Iran and thus avert the nuclear deal by making the US and Iran open enemies in Syria.

There are also rumours that Iran has cut off the Syrian government within the past few months. The actions of Hezbollah in the Qalamoun region where they continue to trounce the anti Government forces in that area, the one positive part of the war for the Syrian government and allied forces who have suffered a series of devastating setbacks in the past month especially in Northern Syria.

The What Really Happened piece on this topic is very strong and material from

A young Yemeni surveys the devastation in the aftermath of a Saudi airstrike on his nation.

April 11th, 2015. (Updated April 23nd)

When the Saudi led coalition announced yesterday that the air strikes were ceasing, they sated plainly and clearly that “the Houthi rebels no longer pose a threat to the Security of Saudi Arabia. The statement was a joke, predicated on the falsehood that the Houthis had ever posed a threat to Saudi security but this statement removes all pretensions of legality from this operation, this massacre, as the self defense as authorised by Section 51 of the UN charter was the only possible legal justification for this operation and the Saudi’s by their own words have admitted there is no threat to their security. Every bombing from now on is simply a naked, criminal terrorist attack. All of the deaths that the Saudis inflict from now on, including those depicted from Taiz after the supposed ceasefire are war crimes, even in the Saudi’s own self serving version of events.

Brigadier General Ahmed al-Asir, now a self confessed war criminal.

This is Brigadier-General Ahmed al-Asiri quoted by al Jazeera, of Qatar, part of the Saudi led coalition bombing Yemen.

Saudi Arabia have announced they will stop bombing Yemen, stating ridiculously that the “Houthi rebels no longer pose a threat to Saudi Arabia.” They never did.They seem to be trying to leave their options open for a ground invasion, my guess is that this will not happen because the Saudi casualties would be huge. Already at least 18 Saudi soldiers have died, mostly in clashes at the Yemen Saudi northern Yemen border region. The civil war will presumably grind on regardless of what the Saudis do. This operation has been without legal justification, there was no threat to Saudi Arabia there was no UN sanction and therefore this entire operation was a war crime. According to Press TV the death toll from the Saudi attacks more than 2700 people killed, Western sources, the New York Times and Wikipedia place it at around 1,000. The Saudis have simply humiliated themselves and proven their mendacity and impotence with this flailing and futile operation.

The Saudis Lied!

The Saudi announcement that the bombardment of Yemen was over turned out to be a brazen lie. Saudi airstrikes have continued after the supposed cessation as the fact that they have been completely militarily ineffective is slowly absorbed by the incompetent and despicable Saudi leadership. Ultimately a political solution is required and until that is achieved the Houthis will continue to defeat the al Qaeda extremists and their allies in Yemen backed by the West and Saudi Arabia and there is nothing the Saudis or the US can do about it.

Not Gaza, Yemen. Imagine the response if Iranian jets were inflicting these wounds upon Saudi children.

This comment from the Iranian President seemed on the mark.

“Speaking to reporters before heading to Indonesia, Rouhani mocked Saudi Arabia by calling it a country with dashed dreams in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon.

“All the failures have accumulated and caused mental and emotional imbalance for that country,” Rouhani said.

Some very strange blasts here.

Massive Explosion in Yemen Capital

Close Up View of Sanaa Yemen Blast

The Result was a Human Tragedy and a Massacre.

Yemen army: Riyadh used banned weapons in Monday airstrike

30 killed in Saudi airstrikes in west of Sana’a, 15 of them civilians

39 civilians killed, 547 injured in airstrikes in west of Sana’a

The Attack on Yemen and the “Game of Thrones” in the Middle East.
The beleaguered and impoverished citizens of Yemen are under attack. Saudi aircraft have been bombing Yemen with Western support for several weeks now, since the 25th of March.
The Saudi bombs have exacted an horrific toll on the people of Yemen and caused the widespread displaceent of civilians in the targeted areas. At least 600 people are dead and more than 100,000 civilians displaced.

The Saudi attacks are militarily ineffective and appear to be having a disastrous political affect if the massive Sana’a demonstration is a sign of the broader sentiment.
The Saudis may have actually done the one thing that may see many Southern Yemenis unite behind the Houthi rebels who have responded to the attacks by intensifying and widening their offensive operations against forces loyal to the former President Abd Rabbuh Mansur Hadi and their Sunni extremist allies of al Qaeda in Yemen.

Yemen: Up to 45 killed and 400 wounded in Saudi-led airstrikes on Sanaa *GRAPHIC*

Yemen: Scud missile depot explodes. Shock wave rips through Sanaa

Political Map of the Middle East with Libya cut off at the far left.

Several Major Wars Between Saudi and Iran Allies.

So there is a large war in North and Western Iraq, all of Syria is effectively at war, there is now a new major war in Yemen. These wars date back to the illegal US invasion of Iraq in 2003 and the extremist groups that formed in the wake of the disastrous US occupation of Iraq. The US presence largely ended in 2011, only to see the US return to war in Iraq.in June 2014 in response to the massive gains made by the supposed Islamic State group in Iraq. Inclding most notably the seizure of Mosul the largest city in Nprthern Iraq.
Soon after the US also entered the Syrian Civil war,on the opposite side to that envisaged 12 months prior after the al Ghouta false flag chemical attack of August 21st, 2013.

The West came to the brink of attacking the Syrian Government in September 2013 in the wake of the al Ghouta false flag of August 21st. Russian diplomatic intervention combined with a negative vote in the British Parliament. And the reluctance of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff and other elements saw the attack averted only days from the scheduled barrage.

The Middle East Defined in the Broadest Sense and the Current Wars .
Technically speaking Afghanistan is in central asia and libya is in north africa, but if the middle east is defined in the broadest possible way as comprising the area between India and Morocco there are curreltly small or large wars are now underway in:Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen and Egypt (Sinai specific) and even small parts of Lebanon, are currently engaged in war of small or large scale, ranging from the problem in Egypt, that is isolated to the far northern Sinai peninsula to the epic, biblical scale tragedy of Syria .
There are a series of large wars taking place in Northern Iraq, but southern Iraq and Baghdad are not at war.
The whole thing is such a complicated mess that it may be better rather than describing each and every conflict in detail, to look at the power players in the Middle East and trace their actions and understand what is happening from the viewpoint of the major regional powers.Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy, major Cabinet posts are filled by the members of 5,000 person Royal family.
The very name gives a strong sign as to the nature of the state.Because naming the state Saudi Arabia would be exactly like calling the UK Windsor (or Saxe Coburg) Britain. Or Tudor Britain in the past. The very state bears the name of the ruling house.
Saudi Arabia has been ruled by the House of Saud since it’s inception in the 1920’s. The House of Saud had a positive relationship with the Imperial powers even before oil was discovered there decades later.
Saudi Arabia has the largest oil deposits of any nation and the oil is extremely accessible. Saudi Arabia is the largest and most powerful of the Gulf states and assumes a leadership role in the GCC, Gulf Cooperation Council.
The House of Saud and Wahhabism.
Saudi Arabia is the home of the major sites of Islam, mecca and Medina and the yearly Muslim pilgrimage remains a major source of income for the Saudis who historically have run the Haj absolutely disastrously, with overcrowding routinely leading to hundreds of deaths in a single pilgrimage.
The specific form of Sunni Islam practiced in Saudi Arabia is Wahhabism and this is deeply problematic. It’s not the practices of Wahhabism that are particularly troubling, although they are also problematic but the view that Wahhabism has of other groups is deeply antagonistic and really anti-human.
The sectarian intolerance of Wahhabism is the core problem of this 18th century doctrine.
Years ago, a pamphlet emerged that had been distributed to guest workers to the nation (another group treated abominably for completely different reasons) to Saudi Arabia. It was at face value a guide to Saudi culture but contained multiple vituperative attacks for example on Shia Islam. A large minority of the population of Saudi Arabia is Shia so this is no incidental blind spot.

This account from Ahmad Ali Khalid a Pakistani who lived in Saudi Arabia provides a neat short portrait of this.

“One can witness a pervasive sort of racism, a form of Saudi supremacy that views other types of Arabs and particularly the South Asian expats (who are mostly labourers) as inferior and mere ‘commodities’ who can be bought and sold ruthlessly. Expats are not human beings but a commodity to be bartered and acquired. Connected to racial supremacy is an attempt to insulate the regime from criticism by using the cloak of religion. Saudi textbooks are filled with references to hate; the Islamic Studies curriculum in the country is simply barbaric. I’ve experienced first-hand being taught by an Islamic Studies teacher in one of the most prominent private schools in Riyadh, about the dangers of having non-Muslims as friends and about the evil conspiracies hatched by Christians, Jews and Shias. In Pakistan, Saudi petro-dollars have funded factories of hate in the form of the madrassa system. ‘Petro-Islam’ is a nightmare scenario – capitalism and a dangerous ideology locked in a tight embrace. It is because of the sheer amount of money behind this austere and dangerous theology that it can easily overwhelm the moderate elements in any given society.”

Pakistan Said No.

Struggling to impose their will upon Yemen, Saudi Arabia requested that Pakistan offer up it’s Air, Naval and Army forces for the Yemen operation.

This implies that the Saudis are so deluded and hubristic that they actually thought that they might send the Army of Pakistan to conquer Yemen. Saudi Arabia has offered substantial financial support to the Pakistani military in the past, and Pakistani soldiers were involved in the operation to seize the Grand Mosque of Mecca from Islmaists who seized it in 1979. The Pakistani Government and Parliament said no to the Saudi Arabia requests, all of them, meaning that the attack on Yemen will grind on pointlessly until the humanitarian crisis arouses the attention of the UN Security Council and a political solution and ceasefire are reached.

It was astonishing to note that the Saudi US Ambassador tried to claim the attack on Yemen was legal under Un article 51, this was a worthless and ridiculous claim as Section 51 refers to the threat of an armed attack on the state. If the Houthi fighters were all lined up on the border poised to invade Saudi Arabia, they could invoke Article 51, there was no threat to Saudi Arabia, the Houthis were not attacking or planning to attack Saudi Arabia there is no basis to invoke Article 51.

Saudi Arabia represents wealthy and well connected backwardness and ignorance in the mode of Government. SLavery was outlawed in 1962. All the Saudi pretensions to leadership ring hollow due to the fact that a corrupt, sectarian monarchy with a policy of selling out to the West can never represent the future of any region. The House of Saud represents a corrupt and decrepit past that desperately clings to power no matter what. That is the one true goal of the House of Saud, to stay in power.

Iran.

The Iranian government seeks to represent the post colonial or anti Imperial trend in the region. The invasion of Iraq was a huge boost to Iran’s regional position, replacing the hostile Iraqi Sunni nationalist government of the Ba’ath party woth Shia parties, all of whom have a very positive relationship with Iran. The implications of this were huge because Iran already had long term strong allies in power in Syria and with a high degree of influence in Lebanon, The Iraq invasion thus created a vast land bridge of Iranian influence reaching from the Iran border with Afghanistan to the East to the Mediterranean coast of Lebanon,

This situation was intolerable to certain parties and more than anything else, the destabilisation of Syria appears to have been an attempt from Israel and Saudi Arabia to counter thisIsrael.

Israel’s energies are directed towards provoking every possible disunity and enmity inside the Arab world. Extremists are offered lavish support. Anything that can be used to portray the Arab world as being violent and backwards is promoted. Anything that can distract from Israel’s daily crimes is promoted. Any who oppose either Iran,Syria or Hezbollah are supported.

The United States.

The US appears to have several different and contradictory foreign policies in the Middle East today. This presumably reflects internal power struggles underway in the US between the Israel firsters, as represented by almost all the Republican party, and the “realists” a less aggressive imperial faction represented by the President and actualised in the Iran nuclear deal and the decision to stop trying to overthrow the Government of Syria.

The Israel firsters are a simple group, they believe in Israel and war and especially wars for Israel.

The “realist” faction, they also believe in war, just on a smaller scale and without the occupation element. The first approach is more noxious, more racist, yet each method can lead to the destruction of nations.

Every time an African immigrant drowns in the Mediterranean, President Obama, David Cameron and Nicholas Sarkozy and the Governments of the US, UK and France all share a part of the blame.

And there is also this story, from late February. It is probably a psyop, but interesting nonetheless.
Reports Saudi Arabia to allow Israel use its airspace for Iran strike

The most obvious war crime of the technically speaking entirely criminal Saudi campaign was the massacre of displaced civilians by the Saudi air strike on the Mazraq camp in Northern Yemen at the end of March that left at least 45 civilians dead.

An aerial view of the destruction of the World Trade Centre. September 11th, 2001.

November 11th, 2014.

September 11th 2001 the Crime that Will End the Empire

The truth about these events is neither comfortable nor palatable. However, until these atrocities are properly investigated, and the authors of the crimes sanctioned the West will remain a doomed and wounded civilisation being steered from one useless and futile war of choice to the next on the back of lies, manufactured threats and false flag terrorism. The Western world has no chance to live in freedom until these lies are completely exposed. It’s that simple. Freedom for Westerners and the 911 lie cannot possibly co-exist. That’s to say nothing of the incipient Police State that is still being erected on the back of the fear and loathing generated by these events right across the Western world.. Literally millions of human beings have faced sudden violent death in the Wars propagated on the back of these hideous and grotesque lies along with the thousands murdered in the event itself. I do not expect or hope that anyone would take my word regarding any of these events, I hope to provoke people to check the facts for themselves and discover the inescapable fact that the September 11th attacks were entirely conceived and conducted by Westerners. The version of events that has been promoted by the Western political leadership and media bears almost no resemblance to the facts. We are not talking about a “couple of anomalies” but instead completely blatant and obvious mega-lies.

The Path from Uncritical Acceptance to Critical Scrutiny.
I watched these events as they happened late at night in Australia. It never occurred to me for a second that the perpetrators could be anything other than anti-Western terrorists,I had heard of Osama bin Laden and had seen video of the man making numerous blood curdling threats and declarations of War against the West, so when the group under bin Laden’s control was blamed, it made perfect sense to me.

After all I had never heard of Operation Gladio , had no idea that Western Intelligence agencies had been responsible for mass murder and terrorism in Europe since the late 1960’s and had been caught blowing up the Bologna Train station
in August 1980, killing 85 people. I knew not of the Brabant Supermarket massacres
in Belgium, civilians brutally murdered by CIA assets and agents to promote the perceived interests of NATO and the Belgian Security State.
The beauty of these mass trauma based mind control technique is that the credulous audience are completely unaware of what has been done to them. I viewed this event from the conventional point of view for a decade after it happened. I was targeted successfully along with billions of others and convinced that a completely insulting and ridiculous story was true because we were all fed the same story at the same time, while we were still upset at what had happened and therefore highly malleable and completely incapable to look upon these events from a rational and critical point of view.

Dissenting Voices Emerge.

When I begin to hear facts and opinions contrary to the Official account in early 2002 I dismissed them immediately. When a friend mentioned that Thierry Meyssan was stating that a large passenger aircraft had not struck the Pentagon I retorted,”So what happened to Flight 77? Where did it go?”

When a friend mentioned that a group of Israeli men had been arrested after filming themselves celebrating the attack
I said “Sure it plays into their narrative but that doesn’t mean that they had anything to do with it.”

When I finally was persuaded to check the veracity of the Official story,just following the Tenth anniversary. In 2011, I was absolutely flabbergasted astonished and mentally shattered to discover that the Official story cannot possibly be true. For this realisation implied that my entire world-view up until that time had been based on false and incorrect assumptions..

Broken Illusion.

Until that time I was living inside the shared illusion of the well inculcated Westerner and it was a rude awakening. I spent around a month reading up on the attacks, I found the Complete Timeline of 911 project very helpful, and read the article “the Destruction of the World Trade Center” by Dr. David Ray Griffin made it simply impossible for me to cling to my cherished assumptions any longer.. I remember feeling an overwhelming gratitude towards David Ray Griffin and all the other people who had not been completely fooled as I had been.
At that time I lacked a broad conceptual understanding of what had happened, I simply knew that the Official explanation for the destruction of the New York buildings could not possibly true. If I had been asked I expect I would have suggested something along the lines of “They must have allowed the terrorist hijackings to happen and then augmented the attack with explosives inside the building.” Since that time I have discovered a number of facts that make it completely clear that there was no suicidal hijacking attack using passenger aircraft on September 11th. at all The entire attack was a manufactured work of fiction. The entire program was implemented by Westerners and the whole al Qaeda hijacking story is simply a blatant and outrageous lie and this can be proven very simply.

Destroying the Official Story of September 11th.New York Story.
There are essentially two key elements of the September 11th story about New York.
The first element is that al Qaeda terrorists are supposed to have hijacked commercial aircraft and flown them into the World Trade Centre Twin towers, the second element is that this act caused the total destruction of the Twin Towers and started the Office fires that destroyed WTC 7. with the commercial aircraft, and these are underpinned by the passive and unspoken claim that nothing else happened. That the two 110 storey skyscrapers and one 47 storey skyscraper were reduced to dust and twisted metal remnants by office fires. An event that would be completely unique in the history of building fires and that has never been repeated. It is the cornerstone of the 911 truth movement that the New York buildings were all attacked with explosives and incendiaries. Any one of these videos makes this quite obvious in my opinion.

9/11 *RARE* CLEAR Video of WTC Building 7 Controlled Demolition

WTC7 in Freefall: No Longer Controversial

North Tower Exploding

911: Massive Blasts Audible Inside North Tower as South Tower is Destroyed

The explosions that destroyed the South Tower are heard within the North Tower. A long low, earthquake rumble is followed by a series of massive blasts, at least five, and they are so loud you can hear them “max” out the microphone on the Camera despite this happening hundreds of feet away in the other building and the sound being insulated by them being in a building. This is from the Naudet brothers film September 11th, Inside the North Tower, it is part of the official narrative and the massive explosions are right there as you would expectas the (other) building is being destroyed. There is quite simply zero doubt whatsoever that all the New York buildings were subjected to a prolonged attack with incendiaries and explosives. The NIST Final Report on Building 7 concedes that “free fall was achieved” on Page 87. “freefall was achieved”
Everyone with any commonsense or knowledge whatsoever understands that a fire couldn’t get a wooden stick to fall at free fall speed. The idea that Office fires caused the destruction of WTC 7 is nonsense of the most transparent and contemptible variety.
Since these important facts were brought to my attention several other startling things about this operation have become clear. These facts make clear the nature of the operation.
These are that the World Trade Centre attack began before the planes event had started. The first thing that happened, only seconds prior to the plane flying into the WTC North Tower was a massive explosion underneath the North tower that has been thoroughly documented and recorded and is supported by numerous eyewitnesses and recordings of the event.
Workers inside the basement area of the WTC North tower were wounded in the attack,

William Rodriguez, Arthur Del Bianco and coleague in hospital wounded in the underground blast. They were three floors underground.

Here three are depicted lying in hospital. Each man describes an explosion prior to the Plane event.
George Stephanopolous, well-known US broadcast journalist described it thus. On ABC America on the day of the attack.“At the time I was actually in the subway, heading towards the World Trade Centre. right around Franklin Street, and after the first explosion the subway station started to fill with smoke, the subway, cars started to fill with smoke. and the subway actually stopped. ”

Eileen states “It was very smoky and we started to exit the path station.”

These witnesses describe the same thing. This lady was on holiday from Alabama for her birthday.

Witness from Alabama.

She describes

”All of a sudden it sounded like…I don’t know where the subway is but it sounded like a collision (or) a bomb, it was just pounding Boom! Boom! Boom! and I literally thought the subway had exploded and all the cars were just going to land right on top of us”that it was going to bring all the (subway) cars down on top of us.”

The Office Worker.

This office worker concurs stating.
“” I was in the path train, there was a huge explosion sound and everyone came out. ”
This video contains all these and many other eyewitness testimonies, along with two audio recordings that indicate a blast before the plane impact. This is really a great compilation of everyday people telling the truth of their experiences on the day, before they knew what the story was supposed to be, and they make it absolutely clear.
9/11 CLEAR bomb going off in WTC BEFORE first plane EVER hit

This video concentrates solely on three separate audio recordings of the North Tower attack, from the FBI, WNYW News and a woman named Ginny Carr. All indicate an underground blast prior to the plane impact.

911: Three Audiotapes Indicate Bomb Before Plane!

“We all saw the plane hit the building”

This is not a United Airlines 767.

Once I understood that the attack did not even begin with the plane, but rather with an underground explosion, synchronised with and designed to be masked by the “plane “ incident. It became clear to me is obvious that these weren’t al Qaeda hijackings. But it is far removed from the conditioned belief that people find it extremely difficult to come to terms with.
Nonetheless, there is no doubt that there were no hijackings associated with these attacks and in order to understand this all that is required is to look at a photograph of the object filmed striking the South tower and compare it against what it is supposed to be, a United Airlines 767 Tail N612UA.

This is a United Airlines 767The sun is shining on a Dark surface.

The Planes Operation was Pure Deception.

No Passenger Aircraft, hijacked or otherwise were involved in this event. That was a lie. A work of fiction. We all saw the plane hit the building, but what plane did we see?
We saw a plane that clearly did not belong to the United Airlines fleet. We saw a plane that cannot possibly have been a United Airlines jet or any other passenger airliner.
We know what United Airlines Boeing 767 look like.

This fireman described it thus “”I saw a black very large air plane fly into the second building.It ca,e from the south”

Indeed we know specifically what United Airlines 767 tail number N612ua looked like because we have it’s photograph. we also have photographs of the aircraft that was filmed flying into the South Tower. The aircraft that is filmed striking the South tower is clearly the wrong colour. It lacks the United Airlines livery and therefore cannot be a United Airlines aircraft at all.
If we turn to the eyewitnesses, we find that numerous independent witnesses describe the plane as being a Military style aircraft. I am not trying to claim the plane belonged to the US military, that is a separate issue. The point is that the plane is described as being Black, being green and being grey, and many witnesses are adamant that it was a “military style’ aircraft” and therefore they support the photographic evidence. The photo and the eyewitnesses cannot tell us who the plane belongs to, but they can well and truly let us know that this was no United Airlines jet. We compare the photo of N!26ua with the object that struck the South tower and the differences are unmistakable.
A Fireman stationed on a boat in the Hudson river describes the plane as a “Manhattan “The plane was a large bomber style green aircraft”The audio can be heard in this video.
911, FDNY – It was a Military Plane that hit the WTC – Updated

This man) states plainly that “”The plane wasn’t no airliner or anything it was large twin engine big grey plane.”

This man concurs, describing it thus. “The plane circled around and actually come onto the opposite side of the buildingand crashed into the building, It was grey to be honest.”
These are only a tiny fraction of the people who made this observation. Many other voices attest to the same thing, but do not appear on camera.

The plane was edited out of the video but the eyewitnesses were clear about what they had seen.

The two women filming the event from a nearby high-rise apartment make the same observation as this screenshot shows. Interestingly, the actual plane appears to have been edited out of their video of the event. These people and many others feature in this excellent video created by the Xendrius Youtube channel.

100% WTC Drone Strike Plane PROOF (Many Witnesses)

Once it is realised that the plane is not a United Airlines jet, it becomes absolutely obvious that this aircraft has not been the subject to a hijacking by any “Muslim terrorist” The entire “al Qaeda” hijacking story is dependent on the fact that the “jihadist terrorists” hijacked passenger aircraft. If the plane is not a passenger aircraft the entire story is revealed as a fabrication. It is quite simply impossible that the terrorists hijacked another plane and the US government made an honest mistake. The fact that the jet that struck the South tower is not a United Airlines jet means that the entire hijacking story was simply a concoction from start to finish. We do not even have to prove the obvious but hard to prove fact that the supposed hijackings did not happen. The point is that the hijacking events do not relate to the plane crash events because the plane crashes are not caused by civilian passenger planes. The hijackings simply do not connect to the crashes even if we suspend disbelief and accept the hijackings actually happened. They have been caught telling one of the most brazen lies in the history of the World.

History will Not be Kind to the Authors of these Atrocities.
Since these facts became clear to me I have often imagined the way history will regard these events in the long-term. Whilst acknowledging that this is unknowable,it seems to me that when the truth of these events is absorbed, as it will undoubtedly be absorbed, because corruption and ignorance can only temporarily obscure the truth from broad sight. In time everyone will know and my guess is that this will be come a classic cautionary tale about the dangers a superpower, an Empire poses to its own and the world’s civilians.

This was an Empire that feared it was running out of the enemies required to maintain their budget and implement their agenda of tyranny, so they essentially arranged for their friends to attack them and solve their problems and used their controlled media to sell the ridiculous planes felling skyscraper nonsense. Eventually people will laugh, it will become a folk story told by people who have no idea what New York city or the USA ever were. People will surely say, “Did you hear the one about the Empire that was so corrupt, so evil, that when they ran out of willing enemies they invented them? And having invented them they arranged for massive crimes to be committed and attributed to the “anointed enemy”.As a work of fiction our world would be mocked as being completely ridiculous.

The Perpetrators are Psychopaths and They Still Rule the West
There are two different crimes associated with the September 11th attacks. The crime itself and the cover up. The identities of the perpetrators remains largely a matter of speculation beyond descriptions such as the “Shadow Government” or “Deep State’ or “Rogue network.: Whatever term it is used the conclusion can only be that these people are psychopaths entirely lacking in regard for human life and their removal from power is a matter of urgency for humanity.

Controlled Media
The cover up on the other hand, brazen and aggressive, has been perpetrated by the entire Western establishment with few exceptions. The Western media have been instrumental in the dissemination of the big lie. It is highly unlikely that the Media will ever be brought to account for their roles in these crimes. The only rational response in my opinion is to leave them to die on the vine.They deserve to wilt and die of inattention. Their corruption and complicity are inescapable and the major Media are obviously still in the thrall of the Psychopaths responsible for this and many other crimes. We can never trust any of them ever again, and after they wither and die they should never be replaced by a concentrated media ever again in human history. It is simply too dangerous a mind control tool to be allowed to exist ever again and the results are staring us in the face everyday.