Reviewed for EH.NET by Peter J. Hill, Department of Business and Economics, Wheaton College, Wheaton, Illinois.

On March 1, 1872, President Ulysses S. Grant signed the Yellowstone Park Act, setting aside over two million acres “as a pleasuring ground for the benefit and the enjoyment of the people” with the additional provision that there was to be protection against “wanton destruction of the fish and game found within said Park.” Further guidance for the operation of Yellowstone came with the creation of the National Park Service in 1916, which specified that it was duty of the new agency “to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and wildlife therein, and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such a manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for future generations.” Needless to say, there is much room for interpretation in phrases such as “the benefit and the enjoyment of the people” and “unimpaired for future generations.” Does this mean that any and all visitors should be welcomed to the park? What if such visitations resulted in ecological damage? And how should the visitors to be cared for? What sort of services should be provided for them? Should the provision be carried out by government or by private entities? In the case of Yellowstone National Park, the lodging, meals, and transportation services have been provided for by private enterprise, and Mark Barringer has provided a useful history of this commercial activity.

From the very beginning, it was clear that Congress did not plan to maintain and operate the commercial facilities that would be necessary for tourists to enjoy the features of the park. However, Congress was also unclear as to the nature of the contract between the federal government as owner and private individuals as providers of transportation, housing, and meals. There were ongoing incentive problems in that a private entity needed an assurance of a long-term contract in order to make any substantial investment in facilities. But such a contract meant the concessionaire would face little competition and could charge monopoly prices. The result was that the private operations in the park became a regulated monopoly, with all of the incentive and information problems inherent in such an arrangement. To complicate matters, the perceptions of the role of the park in the American psyche have changed dramatically and, particularly in more recent decades, have resulted in conflict over how the park should be used and preserved.

From the creation of the park in 1872 until the completion of the Northern Pacific (NP) Railway close to its northern boundary in 1883, small-scale commercial interests provided accommodation and transportation services within the park. The original enabling act required leases to conduct commerce but none of these early entrepreneurs possessed such leases, nor did the superintendent have sufficient budget to enforce the lease provision.

The NP Railway quickly understood that if it was to profit from hauling passengers to Yellowstone, appropriate facilities would need to be provided. Therefore several individuals, all major investors in the NP, formed the Yellowstone National Park Improvement Company (YNPIC) and applied for an exclusive lease to provide hotel services and stage coach tours of the park. Although people could still enter the park in their own wagons, the YNPIC controlled most of the services within the bounds of the park and cooperated with the Northern Pacific Railway in bringing tourists to the area. Barringer recognizes the problem of monopoly control by private interests over the provision of services, but there is another side to the coin that he does not acknowledge. With very low access fees, the park suffered from a congestion externality, but the fact that the Northern Pacific Railway had an almost complete monopoly on transportation to the park and the YNPIC controlled most of the transportation and lodging within the park meant that they had strong incentives to internalize that externality. Therefore, from 1883 until 1915, when automobiles were allowed into Yellowstone, the park probably experienced its best management. There was a strong incentive by the railroad to operate the park in a business-like manner and to provide the optimal experience for visitors.

The YNPIC evolved into another entity, the Yellowstone Park Association, in 1886, again with Northern Pacific financial backing. Throughout this period most of the visitors entered Yellowstone by way of Mammoth Hot Springs, after having purchased an excursion fare on the railroad that included a five-and-a-half-day tour of the park, staying in YPA facilities and traveling in company stage coaches.

In 1915, the park opened its borders to automobiles, which changed the nature of the business for concessionaires, and in 1916 the National Park Service was created. This new government agency had the explicit responsibility of granting the rights to provide commercial services and also to regulate the nature and quality of those services. The first director of the National Park Service, Stephen Mather, believed that competition among concessionaires was harmful to the traveling public and that monopolies for each part of the operation would make the administrative tasks simpler and also better satisfy visitors. He chose a company with close ties to the Northern Pacific to be the primary operator of concessions. Although private individuals could enter in their own automobiles, the railroad was still the primary means of cross-country transportation and the touring buses provided by the Yellowstone Park Transportation Company were a popular way of seeing the park.

Throughout the 1920s, the commercial interests in the park formed an active alliance with the National Park Service to provide a sanitized experience of the natural wonders of the region. The National Park Service killed predators in order to protect antelope, deer and elk. In the Lamar Valley a buffalo ranch was established where bison were bred and fed for the viewing enjoyment of the public.

The 1930s, however, saw the beginning of a struggle over the appropriate use of the park. Until this point, the National Park Service (NPS) and the concessionaires had operated with the same overall objective, to provide services for a large number of visitors and to give them a safe and somewhat artificial “wilderness experience.” The Wilderness Society was founded in 1935 and it provided a rallying point for those who believed that human intrusion in the park needed to be reduced.

The conflict between those who wanted development and expansion of facilities and those who preferred to limit any human encroachment upon nature intensified throughout the 1940s and 1950s. In 1955, the National Park Service created Mission 66, a long-term project scheduled for completion in 1966, the fiftieth anniversary of the NPS. Mission 66 involved massive development of concessions facilities in almost all of the national parks with a major focus on Yellowstone. The plan involved large-scale expansion of facilities within the park by private developers and accompanying improvements in roads and other facilities by the government. Mission 66 turned into a major battleground between those who wished to preserve the park in its “natural” state and those who wished to develop it. The traditional alliance between the National Park Service and the concessionaires fell apart in the 1960s and since then there have been continued revisions of contracts between private entities and the government, and continued debates about the role that Yellowstone National Park is to play in the national experience.

Selling Yellowstone provides numerous insights into the awkward structure of the contract between the public and the private sector in Yellowstone National Park. Both the private operators of facilities and the National Park Service faced an incentive structure that made it difficult to have efficient management and an accurate representation of consumer and voter preferences. And, since the right to operate in the park was valuable, rent-seeking occurred to obtain that privilege.

The most significant problem with the book is that the author’s rhetoric sometimes gets carried away and he claims more than his evidence can support. For instance, he concludes the book by suggesting that “despite popular perceptions that the park was protected from commercial exploitation, the NPS and its concessioner partners virtually owned Yellowstone, selling it piecemeal to receptive customers as if it were an inexhaustible, self-replenishing commodity” (p. 173-74). Barringer seems to think it necessary to make rather sweeping claims of exploitation and of “selling off the park.” However, his analysis leads to the more modest conclusion that competing interest groups, both inside and outside of government, tried to gain control to further their own interests. Neither the government nor the private sector operated in a very workable institutional structure and it is not surprising that the results were somewhat disappointing. Nevertheless, as a narrative history of the attempts to provide services to visitors through a combination of public and private efforts, the book is a successful enterprise.

================

Peter J. Hill is professor of economics at Wheaton College and a Senior Associate at PERC, Bozeman, Montana. He is the author of numerous articles on property rights in the American West. He is presently working on a book-length manuscript with Terry L. Anderson entitled The Not So Wild, Wild West: Property Rights on the Frontier.

Copyright (c) 2002 by EH.NET. All rights reserved. This work may be copied for non-profit educational uses if proper credit is given to the author and the list. For other permission, please contact the EH.NET Administrator (administrator@eh.net; Telephone: 513-529-2229; Fax: 513-529-6992). Published by EH.NET Aug 26, 2002. All EH.Net reviews are archived at http://eh.net/bookreviews
Citation: Peter J. Hill, “Review of Mark Daniel Barringer Selling Yellowstone: Capitalism and the Construction of Nature” Economic History Services, Aug 26, 2002, URL : http://eh.net/bookreviews/library/0532.shtml

Feeds For You

Fair Use Notice
--- This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
--- We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
--- If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.