I suspected this day would come, when all of those who jumped to politically driven conclusions about injuries or not to George Zimmerman would have to confront actual evidence.

So now the Martin family attorney who went on television to proclaim Zimmerman a liar about suffering head injuries will go back on television to admit he was wrong. Right?

And that attorney will go before the jury and say something along the lines of, “All of you who saw me on television but don’t want to admit it because you’ll be kicked off the case, please know that I didn’t know what I was talking about, I didn’t wait for the evidence, and I am sorry.” Right?

And all those in the left-blogosphere who completely politicized the incident and proclaimed a grainy video proof positive that Zimmerman was lying, without waiting for the evidence, will do the same. Right?

ABC News exclusively obtained a graphic photograph of George Zimmerman’s head covered in blood that was taken just three minutes after the shooting that left 17-year-old Trayvon Martin dead. This news comes as Zimmerman is set to go before a judge in a bond hearing on Friday.

The picture shows two cuts on the back of Zimmerman’s head with blood trickling down….

The photo does not prove that Zimmerman acted with justifiable use of force. There is a lot more evidence to come out.

But it does expose the truth about those who have viewed this case since day one as a way to score political points.

Update 12:10 p.m.: I could not follow the bail hearing today, but apparently the Judge held that Zimmerman would be released on $150,000 bond, with ankle bracelet monitoring and other conditions. Incredibly, the reports I have seen indicate Zimmerman testified at the hearing. Once I have a chance to understand better what happened this morning, I’ll have a separate post.

(added) As part of the testimony this morning, a police investigator confirmed that Zimmerman suffered head injuries:

“His injuries are consistent with trauma to the back of his head,” investigator Dale Gilbreath said. “There is two lacerations to the back of his head.”

That’s some really bloody reasonable doubt for his eventual acquittal. And it’s long been apparent that Crump is not a high caliber lawyer–his job has been primarily to act as publicist for Trayvon’s parents and to keep their media appearance schedule booked. They hucksters have relied heavily on the Leftist social justice seeking CRT media to prosecute their case for them on national TV and have been served well.

btw–still a national media blackout on Daniel Adkins, the unarmed Hispanic male shot in cold blood by a black man in Phoenix. Adkins only had a dog leash in his possession. No complaints from the hucksters on SYG here. No, none at all. They really accept the eyewitness testimony there too, no complaints. Nothing to see here.

Fortunately, America has caught on to their political maneuvering and allies in the media.

What has “teenager” got to do with anything? And it’s obvious why you would test a corpse for drugs, but not a living person who has fourth amendment rights; especially when there is reason to suppose that the corpse was on drugs but none at all to suspect that of the living person.

[…] a liar about suffering head injuries will go back on television to admit he was wrong. Right? LINK The police officer was being truthful when he stated that Zimmerman was bleeding from head and […]

I thought is interesting that the photo, taken some 3 minutes after the shooting, comes with a story of somebody who saw the fight and can kill those claims that Zimmerman self-inflicted those injuries on himself.

I am watching/listening to the bond hearing right now. Is it customary to practically try the defendant during the course of this? The prosecuting attorney is doing a lot of grandstanding and introducing/requesting what seems to be an unusual amount of detail.

2. no, it does not. Here’s why…a police agency will OFTEN give a presser where they discuss generalities BUT NOT SPECIFICS of a case. Because they CAN’T without going OUTSIDE THE FLUCKING LAW and good sense.

Why was this photo withheld while the threats and marches were going on? They didn’t want to interrupt the blood lust activism? That news cycle is over … does “short attention span America” have interest in dry facts now?

That ABC article also mentioned powder burns on Martin’s sweatshirt … which I guess is proof of the close contact. One can hit his head on the ground really hard and not bleed at all … between this photo and the broken nose and the amount of time between the witness observing him screaming for help, and the shot … it sure seems this should never even make it to trial … except to please the politicians and media, and Sharpton and some mobs.

Oh, it’s about R vs. D, alright. It’s just that the Rs always cave so fast it never looks like there’s a fight…..because there isn’t. The Rs never fight. They just cave, especially to the race card. They don’t care whose ox gets gored. They are so cowed by the left and the racebaiters, they’d sell their own grandmother out to avoid getting beaten up by the pro-black media.

Isn’t there going to be a preliminary hearing before confirming there will be a trial?

Question for the lawyers here: What are the chances this gets tossed out for lack of probable cause or it’s determined to be self-defense or whatever other possibilities can take place before the case is confirmed to go to trial?

“And that attorney will go before the jury and say something along the lines of, “All of you who saw me on television but don’t want to admit it because you’ll be kicked off the case, please know that I didn’t know what I was talking about, I didn’t wait for the evidence, and I am sorry.” Right?”

I hate to tell you this, but in a criminal trial, the family attorney will not have a chance to say anything at all to the jury. Only the witnesses, the State Attorney and the Defense Attorney (and the judge) will talk to the jury.

The family attorney was representing the family whose son was killed under suspicious circumstances. I don’t blame him for any outragious comments. But the Media and all the racial opportunists are the ones to blame.