Throughout my talk I posed choice problems, including St Petersburg's, Allais's and Ellsberg's "paradoxes" and about a third of the audience (in total about 20 people) would always give the Bayesian normatively right answer.

One member of the audience referred to the Ellsberg's preferences as conservative. I liked that a lot

Ellsberg, I think, is a very nice example of a problem which reveals your philosophical ideas about probability. I think this is very interesting indeed.

I really like the Reasoning group people at Kent and I look forward to see them again.