*Membership spots not really limited!

Staff Writer

doombug wrote: You are so incredibly full of shit at the moment with your posts today.

I'm assuming yesterday was the birthday and today you're just trying to be controversial?

Yesterday was my Birthday.

And I'm not trying to be controversial, I genuinely felt Batwoman was boring, and very much a typical Bat-comic, there was nothing there I haven't seen 100 times before, apart from Lesbianism, which only goes to prove how DC have exploited the character's sexuality to make up for shortcomings in actual characterisation and good stories.

The art was nice, but it was unnecessarily complex, such a straightforward story was only made less enjoyable due to Williams' confusing layouts. It's like dressing a dog in Luis Vuitton or something.

But this thread isn't about Batwoman, it's about Morning Glories, so I'll save the rest of my thoughts for when I do eventually do my review.

Staff Writer

doombug wrote: You are so incredibly full of shit at the moment with your posts today.

I'm assuming yesterday was the birthday and today you're just trying to be controversial?

Yesterday was my Birthday.

And I'm not trying to be controversial, I genuinely felt Batwoman was boring, and very much a typical Bat-comic, there was nothing there I haven't seen 100 times before, apart from Lesbianism, which only goes to prove how DC have exploited the character's sexuality to make up for shortcomings in actual characterisation and good stories.

The art was nice, but it was unnecessarily complex, such a straightforward story was only made less enjoyable due to Williams' confusing layouts. It's like dressing a dog in Luis Vuitton or something.

But this thread isn't about Batwoman, it's about Morning Glories, so I'll save the rest of my thoughts for when I do eventually do my review.

Staff Writer

And I'm not trying to be controversial, I genuinely felt Batwoman was boring, and very much a typical Bat-comic, there was nothing there I haven't seen 100 times before, apart from Lesbianism, which only goes to prove how DC have exploited the character's sexuality to make up for shortcomings in actual characterisation and good stories.

The art was nice, but it was unnecessarily complex, such a straightforward story was only made less enjoyable due to Williams' confusing layouts. It's like dressing a dog in Luis Vuitton or something.

But this thread isn't about Batwoman, it's about Morning Glories, so I'll save the rest of my thoughts for when I do eventually do my review.

So a total of 2 pages if her even touching on her own sexuality is exploitive? What you can't admit is that even after getting a free copy, your mind was already set on disliking the story no matter what.

And I'm not trying to be controversial, I genuinely felt Batwoman was boring, and very much a typical Bat-comic, there was nothing there I haven't seen 100 times before, apart from Lesbianism, which only goes to prove how DC have exploited the character's sexuality to make up for shortcomings in actual characterisation and good stories.

The art was nice, but it was unnecessarily complex, such a straightforward story was only made less enjoyable due to Williams' confusing layouts. It's like dressing a dog in Luis Vuitton or something.

But this thread isn't about Batwoman, it's about Morning Glories, so I'll save the rest of my thoughts for when I do eventually do my review.

So a total of 2 pages if her even touching on her own sexuality is exploitive? What you can't admit is that even after getting a free copy, your mind was already set on disliking the story no matter what.

******

by ****** » Wed Mar 16, 2011 2:46 pm

Viscous Skid wrote:Amlah is being mean, so let me take a moment to say how excited I am for Super-star Nick Spencer to come in and fix the blah in Secret Avengers.

There is only blah in Bruvengers if you want there to be.

Kind of like the lesbian exploitation that only occurs in Punchy's copies of Batwoman.

Staff Writer

doombug wrote:So a total of 2 pages if her even touching on her own sexuality is exploitive? What you can't admit is that even after getting a free copy, your mind was already set on disliking the story no matter what.

It's more than two pages, and it's the only thing that makes her any different from any other Bat-character, which I think is exploitative.

I did read it, and it's an honest opinion, I'm sorry if that annoys you, but hey.

Staff Writer

doombug wrote:So a total of 2 pages if her even touching on her own sexuality is exploitive? What you can't admit is that even after getting a free copy, your mind was already set on disliking the story no matter what.

It's more than two pages, and it's the only thing that makes her any different from any other Bat-character, which I think is exploitative.

I did read it, and it's an honest opinion, I'm sorry if that annoys you, but hey.