JYJ’s official statement regarding KBS’s ban of broadcast appearances

[Park Jae Duk] First of all, in the case of lawsuit that KBS has made an issue of, the court already ruled last year that SM’s subordinate contract with JYJ was invalid as the court judged that the contract was unilateral and unfair to JYJ. Also last February, the court also acknowledged SM’s interference of JYJ’s entertainment activities and has issued an indirect compulsory order in support of the invalidity of the contract. Thus, KBS’s insistence is not logical.

In addition, as known, the court has dismissed SM’s application of provisional injunction regarding the ‘dual-contract,’ and also issued a judgment saying that SM should not interfere with JYJ signing a contract with C-JeS Entertainment and continuing their activities.

We believe that it was an inappropriate remark of KBS as a public broadcasting company, saying something is far from objective facts, as if JYJ, who have been in this lonely fight against a giant management company demanding a reasonable contract as an artist, have caused a social problem.

We strongly request that KBS formally rectify remarks to the public who’s not aware of the situation may misunderstand.

Finally, it is sad and bitter that KBS mentioned cultural orders while JYJ have been enhance national prestige as appointed honorary ambassadors of various national projects for overseas promotion.

[NOTE: The above official statement from C-jeS was announced against the below nonsense about JYJ’s TV appearance from KBS Entertainment department .]

This is ruling from Seoul Central District Court, to dismiss an objection against JYJ’s provisional injunction, and SM’s injunction to terminate their management contract with C-JeS Entertainment. This clearly proves that JYJ never made dual-contract.

.

* To KBS

If JYJ cannot appear on TV because they are in the process of lawsuit with management just like you said, then why don’t you ban SM too? If KBS want to be that objective, SM artists also should be banned until the court judge the case. Why do you only apply your policy to only one side?