A moment of silence for all the dead Jihadists

NO leader is held responsible for any of their actions, and this includes Hitler, Bush, Mao, Stalin, Mussolini, "insert name of dictator/leader
here", etc.

Hitler DID NOT kill anyone. The brainwashed German soldiers decided to go out on their own and kill people.

Stalin DID NOT murder millions of Russians. The brainwashed Russian soldiers decided to go out on their own and kill people.

George Bush DID NOT invade Iraq or Afghanistan. The brainwashed American soldiers decided to go out on their own and kill people.

The leaders are not held responsible.

The people are.

Just because someone brainwashes you via the media and says "Look There's Terrorists Wanting To Kill Us" and offers NO investigation at all, and
you take their words for it, and go kill people thousands of miles over seas, then it's YOUR fault and YOU are held responsible.

Step outside of the illusion box for a second, and realize what I'm saying.

Leaders don't kill people. Soldiers kill people, and soldiers are ONLY mercenaries because they are paid to kill.

Like I've said before war is no longer fought for freedom. It is fought for companies such as Exxon Mobile, Wal-Mart, McDonalds, etc.

Amazingly after 7 years of believing that Al-qaeda was a terrorist organization, I have just realized my ignorance.

The media works in mysterious ways in brainwashing individuals like me. I truly thought I was the few who hadn't been infected by false information
and here I'm

Al Qaeda No. 2: We don't kill innocents

edition.cnn.com...

Now Al-Qaeda has clearly said that they don't kill innocent intentionally, now just by saying that makes them a non-terroristic organization because
we can never know someones intentions. Forexample America drops a bomb on a village in Afghanistan and purely civilians die, we can't say what the
intentions of American army was for dropping that bomb, they said it was an accident or wrong intelligence, what ever the excuse the world accepts it.
I'm here to explain to you the excuse of Al-qaeda which you should accept if you accept the American excuse.

Firstly the Al-qaeda intelligence is very inaccurate compared to the American. Al-qaeda does not have a separate intelligence agency like the American
CIA, soooo they are in a huge disadvantage. If America with all it's might can make mistakes and kill civilians based on inaccurate intel than
Al-qaeda also can. Why is it that the media claims Al-qaeda kills civilians intentionally and call them terrorists when they know that their intel is
very weak therefore deemed to kill civilians here and there (accidentally).

Secondly Al-qaeda does not have guided missiles, jets with guided missiles or any precise targeting weapons therefore are once again in a huge
disadvantage compare to the US yet still the western force in Afghanistan has still managed to kill more than one quarter of all civilian deaths since
the start of 2008.

Anti-government militants caused 422 of the recorded civilian casualties while government or foreign troops killed 255 people, according to the UN
numbers. The cause of 21 deaths was unclear.

www.cbc.ca...

Now seeing the disadvantages of Al-qaeda you can justify the (accidental) deaths of civilians cause directly by the organization, same goes for
America. The name calling is basically propaganda, when I read history books I read that Indians who rose up against the British colonialist were also
called terrorists I find that amazing yet no one learns from history.

Have fun learning the truth

signature
"On 21 September 2001, the Taliban responded that if the United States could bring evidence that bin Laden was guilty, they would hand him over,
stating there was no evidence in their possession linking him to the 11 September attacks."

"This counter offer was immediately rejected by the U.S. as insufficient."

If the US were to target civilians that place would already be levelled and finished, you know it. Those military over there were sent there to
protect you and your way of life , your freedom.

Yes but why would they tell everyone they want to kill civilians? That is the point, everyone rejects killing civilians, even Al-Qaeda has, that
doesn't make you innocent since we don't know the intentions of any individual.

America sends a drone and purely civilians die, no militants in site. How do we know what the target was? They say wrong intel, I can punch you in the
face and tell you hey sorry wrong person. Get what I mean?

Why is it that the media claims Al-qaeda kills civilians intentionally and call them terrorists when they know that their intel is very weak therefore
deemed to kill civilians here and there (accidentally).

Secondly Al-qaeda does not have guided missiles, jets with guided missiles or any precise targeting weapons therefore are once again in a huge
disadvantage compare to the US yet still the western force in Afghanistan has still managed to kill more than one quarter of all civilian deaths since
the start of 2008.

That's about the dumbest thing I've heard all week.

That still means that

A. They were responsible for 3/4 of the civilian deaths. Which is still three times more than the US and the west caused.

and

B. Since they did not have all those high tech weapons that fired at a target from great distances or guided missiles that meant they had to be
up close and personal sometimes almost face to face and they knew who they were killing.

A. They were responsible for 3/4 of the civilian deaths. Which is still three times more than the US and the west caused.

and

And have you compared the two forces? The advantages and disadvantages? For example wrong Intel bombs town and obliterates a town even though America
has one of the best Intelligent agencies in the world.

B. Since they did not have all those high tech weapons that fired at a target from great distances or guided missiles that meant they had to be
up close and personal sometimes almost face to face and they knew who they were killing.

Now that means they will resort to suicide bombing which they have. Most innocent casualties have been caused by suicide bombings which is similar to
those Jets, Missiles etc etc. They don't have a plane, but they have a car, they don't have a missile, but they have home made rockets etc etc

Originally posted by oozyism
And have you compared the two forces? The advantages and disadvantages? For example wrong Intel bombs town and obliterates a town even though America
has one of the best Intelligent agencies in the world.

Are you really that dense? The Taliban speak the language and fit right in. They know the country better than any western force. Give me a break they
are at a disadvantage?

Now that means they will resort to suicide bombing which they have. Most innocent casualties have been caused by suicide bombings which is similar to
those Jets, Missiles etc etc. They don't have a plane, but they have a car, they don't have a missile, but they have home made rockets etc etc

No that means they find somebody stupid enough to carry out their attacks etc etc. As the coward leaders go home to SWAT across the border in
Pakistan to recruit more people who are poor and stupid enough to believe their bull etc etc.

Now Al-Qaeda has clearly said that they don't kill innocent intentionally, now just by saying that makes them a non-terroristic organization because
we can never know someones intentions.

And the gov clearly said that Osama was responsible for the attacks on 9/11, so how foolish of anybody to doubt their intentions right? Come on
really??did I read this right? Or can I assume that all of the ignorance you supposedly lost was replaced by this?

I am clearly saying that Al-Qaeda is indeed a terrorist organization who does indeed kill innocents and beheads captives, or do you need towatch the
videos of the murders yourself?

To answer the question accurately , you would need to place yourself outside of the paradigm you are bound by . You would need to cast aside your
subjectivity on the issue and look on it from the outsiders perspective, where you do not have a dog in the race . For americans , this would be a
simple exercise . Imagine the OP had envisaged a theoretical situation where China had invaded Afghanistan for control of the pipelines and for
geopolitical gain . Imagine for the exercise that China maintains it is for the purpose of national security , such that they are fighting the
terrorist in Afghanistan rather than fighting them in China . From that point , you have to be honest and then say what you think regarding the
Afghan's asynchronous methods of warfare.

Note also , many of these so called suicide bombings are not necessarily the work of so called jihardists , as those of you that remember the case in
2005 of the two british members of the special reconnaissance regiment (SAS) who were caught in Basra disguised as arabs and carrying a car bomb.
This is a known british tactic , and documented by Colonel Frank Kitson regarding it's use in Kenya by the british in the 1950's.

Are you really that dense? The Taliban speak the language and fit right in. They know the country better than any western force. Give me a break they
are at a disadvantage?

I don't know how discussion are diverted from end to another, I think video discussion should be my next priority. In written material you have to be
as specific as possible to reduce confusion. First I was talking about Al-Qaeda, they are foreigners too, but since we are talking about Taliban
let's talk about Taliban:
What can the Taliban do other than Gorilla warfare and suicide bombing, explain.

No that means they find somebody stupid enough to carry out their attacks etc etc. As the coward leaders go home to SWAT across the border in
Pakistan to recruit more people who are poor and stupid enough to believe their bull etc etc.

Umm cowards? Why do you use those words? I can counter and prove Americans as most coward people on Earth, but then really what is the product of such
statements?

Any ways, that is the only means they can fight against the world's most powerful war machine. Let me give you an example:

Note also , many of these so called suicide bombings are not necessarily the work of so called jihardists , as those of you that remember the case in
2005 of the two british members of the special reconnaissance regiment (SAS) who were caught in Basra disguised as arabs and carrying a car bomb. This
is a known british tactic , and documented by Colonel Frank Kitson regarding it's use in Kenya by the british in the 1950's.

Thanks for clarification, I have never heard of this before but I wouldn't be surprised. I had a hunch that maybe the civil war in Iraq was
orchestrated to distract the enemy. The enemy did get distracted and started fighting each other with huge losses. That is why the same general who
was in Iraq now runs the operations in Afghanistan.

You should watch some videos of insurgents in Iraq sniping American soldiers, you might think it is an action movie, but when you see your own people
get as$ whooped, that is when you start the ranting

No I don't feel bad, those American boys are highly trained and they know the risk they take if an when going into a combat zone, some will not come
home, some will get injured but Every one of them will know that ALL GAVE SOME AND SOME GAVE ALL!

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.