used to have a usp in 45acp. flawless function. sold it within a year. the problems with usp for me were the feel and ergonomics. i thought it was a huge clunky gun with the controls in just the wrong spots for me. it felt like it shoulda had a chambering for some sort of .50cal rather than the 45acp.

ive never cared for HK firearms they function i just dont like the ergonomics.

__________________“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.” ― Samuel Adams

Dzscubie, not only did I have a pistol just like that lent to me by my employer, but I had a shirtfront dingus just like that one in your photo! It's currently being fitted with a 'retired' insert.

I actually own a USP40, but the grip is just a bit too wide for comfortable use. I can shoot it, qualified perfect with it in fact, but it's just a bit wide. Great design and engineering, bad ergonomics.

The P2000 fits just fine and I'm told the USP Compact is the same grip size as the P2000. Ergo, there may be a USP Compact 40 in my future. Makes a great concealed gun.