UCS Manager vs. HP OneView

HP introduced the world to their OneView management appliance by comparing it to Cisco UCS Manager through a series of YouTube video attacks this past fall. I can almost hear the meetings… ‘Forget stealth, forget the high road – let’s attack the leader in converged systems management directly – let’s attack Cisco UCS Manager!‘ While we can’t help but respect HP’s gumption in attempting to pick on their #1 competitor, our flattery turned to dismay that HP continues to miss the boat on how UCS management truly works. Rather than respond with feigned outrage, we patiently waited for HP to release OneView for our own test drive.

What we found is that HP OneView continues a pattern that we see with legacy-inspired, top-down software managers. There is no ability for policies to adapt to changing configurations or server types. No ability for profiles to cross server generations or even to create policies for rack servers. No ability to truly create templates and resource pools for automated assignment. It is visually appealing, but remains a licensed software stack working hard to try and correct the limitations of an aging platform.

UCS was developed around UCS Manager as the centralized nervous system to automate server provisioning through flexible and secure policy-based management. UCS model-based architecture is embedded in the fabric, allowing users to define policies for their applications – not for the hardware itself. It is not software sitting on an appliance that ‘fires and forgets’ scripted commands down to waiting end points. UCS Manager provides extreme flexibility to respond to business needs because there aren’t restrictions on the policies – any profile can be applied to any blade or rack server type or generation, regardless of configuration. It is the foundation for stateless computing, where infrastructure is configured on demand for any workload.

Cisco compares a handful of key management features to HP OneView in the following short videos:

Some of the individuals posting to this site, including the moderators, work for Cisco Systems. Opinions expressed here and in any corresponding comments are the personal opinions of the original authors, not of Cisco. The content is provided for informational purposes only and is not meant to be an endorsement or representation by Cisco or any other party. This site is available to the public. No information you consider confidential should be posted to this site. By posting you agree to be solely responsible for the content of all information you contribute, link to, or otherwise upload to the Website and release Cisco from any liability related to your use of the Website. You also grant to Cisco a worldwide, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free and fully-paid, transferable (including rights to sublicense) right to exercise all copyright, publicity, and moral rights with respect to any original content you provide. The comments are moderated. Comments will appear as soon as they are approved by the moderator.