Price-matching guarantees (PMGs) are offers to match a competitor's price on a specific item. Such guarantees are extremely common in U.S. retail practice, and their impact has been studied in several published papers. The existing analytic literature models each retailer as a single-product seller; most work assumes that each retailer's product is identical with (or completely substitutable for) the competitor's product. In reality, competing retailers often sell multiple products, and these products do not always overlap, or may overlap partially but not totally. Furthermore, retailers that offer PMGs routinely exclude certain offerings from PMG coverage. This raises the interesting question of how product variety and product-stocking factors affect retailer decisions about offering PMGs. In this paper, we simultaneously consider three factors of retailing importance that imply results consistent with PMG use and nonuse: the ability to choose to stock the same product as, or a product differentiated from, a competitor's offering; the possibility of shelf-space limitations on the ability to stock complete variety; and the category-demand-enhancing effect of variety. These are sensible and realistic descriptive factors shaping retailers' product and pricing decisions, and because they have not been considered jointly in the prior literature on PMGs, their joint consideration helps to expand our understanding of the drivers of PMG implementation and impact. In the presence of these three factors, we examine retailers' decisions about whether to offer a PMG, what product(s) to stock, and how to price the product(s) stocked. Our results show that shelf-space limitations have an important influence on PMG provision: in particular, when retailers are shelf-space constrained, and product substitutability in the category is sufficiently large, choosing to use PMGs (which by definition also requires stocking identical products) is strictly less profitable than enduring Bertrand (price) competition but enjoying retail product differentiation. The result that PMGs can be profit-reducing relative to head-to-head retail competition is a novel one, driven in our model by the opportunity costs of stocking identical products, i.e., the inability to benefit from the demand-enhancing effects of variety and the differential (small or large) between Bertrand pricing and PMG pricing levels. We further show that under asymmetric shelf-space availability, either product variety will be severely limited or retailers will offer a different array of products. Weak substitution between products leads to the latter, with pricing between the differentiated products Bertrand and monopoly levels; strong substitution leads to the former, with pricing at the monopoly level. Our results also show that with unlimited shelf space, both competing retailers offer PMGs, stock the entire available product line, and enjoy monopoly pricing. Given our focus on product variety issues, we also relate our results to the literature on branded variants. Our results demonstrate that the nature of product variety, the availability of retail shelf space, and the category-demand-enhancing effect of variety are key market characteristics that jointly and strongly affect the optimality of PMGs and the resulting pricing and profitability characteristics of the market.

ACCESSION #

43930822

Related Articles

Based on the review of specialized literature, this article aims to investigate the strategic role played by design within companies. A transition is outlined from the traditional precise and simplistic level of approach to design, to the need to integrate and implement the values of design to...

In today's competitive global economy, the company that gets the right product to the consumer fastest has a competitive edge. A number of tools can help your enterprise shorten its product development times. First, work to transfer the principles of value stream analysis from production to...

Predicts that companies seeking a competitive advantage in the 1990s will adopt a time-based innovation strategy for rapidly turning new technology into new products or for quickly making incremental improvements in existing products. Reasons why product development in the United States is...

Pharmaceutical industry estimates are used to simulate the innovative performance over time of firms with different capabilities. Competitive advantage due to dynamic scope economies is small during the initial exploration of technological trajectories, but subsequently grows. Firms exploring...

New product ideation might be improved by identifying and applying certain well-defined schemes derived from an historical analysis of product-based trends, termed "templates." These templates might contribute to the understanding and prediction of new product emergence. The authors derive...

The article reports that the Kingfisher share price rose to 6.5% on the London exchange on July 24, 2008 after B&Q retail chain announced a 3.7% sales increase for the 10 weeks to July 12. B&Q stated that the 20% increase in sales of their seasonal categories and their new products is...

Focuses on the performance of the London Stock Exchange after the launching of the covered warrants in England. Expansion of the stock market; Increase on the level of competitive advantage; Prices of the stocks.

Consistency among the various elements of a marketing program is believed essential in building and maintaining brand image and equity. And yet, a brand's ultimate presentation to customers is controlled more often by the retailer than by the manufacturer. In this research, the authors...