"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in messagenews:ldh656$as0$1@pcls7.std.com...> "Tom Potter" <tdp1001@yahoo.com> writes:>>>Sammy,>>why do you spam sci.physics>>with articles from popular science articles>>>and spam my posts with off topic comments>>such as the one above?>> It's not that off-topic in alt.comp.freeware. (Why were _you_ spamming> such a group with alleged physics?)>> Regardless, you're in China. Your system is probably so pwned that> nothing Sam could tell you could help you.

get all bent out of shape because I sharesome of my posts about physicswith my pals in alt.comp.freeware,

and why they are so concerned about China,

and why they dilute the intellectual value of PHYSICS threadsby misdirection and posting NONESENSE comments,rather than addressing the PHYSICS issuesraised in the threads.

Could someone explain this to me?

It may be that the post which is listed below,is too complex for them to comprehend and comment on.========================================

The explicate order!

Reality is composed of properties, not objects.( Objects arise from real and imagined properties. )

1. There is only one property in the universe and that is:closed cycles about geodesic paths.

2. These cycles can be clockwise or counter-clockwise.

3. These cycles combine algebraically.

4. What we call bodies are aggregates of cycles which we perceive to beassociated.

5. Time arise from three H's. ( Cycles or angular displacement )a. H(M), the H to be measured.b. H(big), an H which can be used as a reference with which to determinewhen H(M) has completed a cycle.c. H(small), an H which can be counted to determine "how long" it takes H(M)to complete a cycle.

What we call time is H(small) / H(M). In other words, time is the H(small)of some outside reference system per H(M) as referenced against the moststable background possible, H(big). Perhaps, H(big) should be calledH(small) as many cycles of H(big) occur for small angular displacements ofH(small).

6. The Uncertainty Principle arises, because we can only count whole cyclesof H(Small). ( The use of neutrino's rather than electrons as our referencewould reduce the uncertainly enormously. )

7. What we call an interaction is when two aggregates of H are perceived toinfluence each other in some way. Interactions basically change the H of thesystems under observation. Interactions involve 4 H's.

a. H(A) - the cycles perceived in body A.b. H(B) - the cycles perceived in body B.c. H(C) - the cycle of the bodies about a common center.d. H(D) - the cycle ( precession ) of the bodies about the universe.

The relationship between these cycles is:

H(A) * H(B) = H(C) * H(D)

Note that this equation equates particle-like properties to wave-likeproperties. H(A) and H(B) are associated with bodies ( particle-like ) whileH(C) ( period ) and H(D) ( Precession ) are associated with times (wave-like ).

8. The dimensionless ratios of these cycles are commonly called beta.

beta(A) = H(C) / H(A)beta(B) = H(C) / H(B)

These beta's are sine functions. The corresponding cosine functions can beused to compute conventional Special Relativity problems.

Time is associated with left handed neutrinos.Time and parity are the same thing.Time and parity violations are associated with right-handed neutrinos.

----

Some of the advantages of this system over the current system include:

1. No infinities.2. Only one fundamental property.3. Is symmetrical, whereas the conventional system tends to emphasize themass of more massive bodies and the velocity of less massive bodies.4. Clearly shows the particle-wave duality.5. Indicates why uncertainty exists. ( Smallest cycle is our scale )6. Eliminates errors caused by the radius concept.7. No constants are needed.8. Makes clear what constants are for if they are used. ( Scaling )9. Energy-like angular displacement ( H(D) ) is velocity invariant.

Note that these fluctuations would cause the smallest cycles ( Thoseassociated with neutrinos and electrons. ) to deviate from perfect circlesbut as theywould average out and we have no smaller cycle to use to detect them, wecould not observe them directly.

It seems to me that these "chaotic fluctuations" would let some kind ofunderlying "implicate order" modulate uncertainty chaotically ( Rather thanrandomly as Bohm indicated. ) and interface with the classical world in sucha way as to allow a deterministic world to arise from it.

This makes sense to me because:

1. If there was an underlying "Planck's Constant", we could use it toperformFourier transforms on uncertainties which occur at a higher level and detectfluctuations. ( There may be a "Planck s Constant" associated with neutrinosbut chaos would ultimately lie under this order and any future unfoldedorder. )

2. If the underlying fluctuation was random, negative entropy would berandomly distributed rather than associated with certain kinds of "things".The distribution of negative entropy seems to indicate that what arises fromuncertainty is not random.