Under a DACA amnesty, American taxpayers would be left with a $26 billion bill. About one in five DACA illegal aliens, after an amnesty, would end up on food stamps, while at least one in seven would go on Medicaid. Since DACA’s inception under Obama, more than 2,100 illegal aliens have been kicked off the program after it was revealed that they were either criminals or gang members. JOHN BINDER

No Crackdown on Illegal EmployersThe New York Times, March 20, 2017. . .The system, which was designed to allow employers to cross-reference an applicant’s work-eligibility documents against government records, remains voluntary for most employers two decades after its rollout. E-Verify has been criticized as an intrusive tool that can hurt workers who are wrongly flagged. But the fundamental reason it has not been embraced as a nationwide standard is that even in this era of deepening xenophobia in American politics, there is little appetite among lawmakers to hold employers accountable. Mr. Trump’s flurry of executive orders on immigration have been silent on the issue.

The budget request the Trump administration submitted to Congress last week includes a $2.6 billion down payment for the wall, $1.5 billion to ramp up detention and deportation operations and $314 million to hire immigration agents. Meanwhile, a proposal to make E-Verify compulsory nationwide is allocated a paltry $15 million.

“The lifetime
costs of Social Security and Medicare benefits of illegal immigrant
beneficiaries of President Obama’s executive amnesty would be well over a
trillion dollars, according to Heritage Foundation expert Robert Rector’s
prepared testimony for a House panel obtained in advance by Breitbart News.”

Today they are literally hundreds of Sanctuary cities (whether they are deemed such by law or by action, approx 280) that do not cooperate with immigration officials. The people pushing the non-cooperation with ICE are political activists and politicians who do not personally suffer the day to day burden of rising crime rates and danger. Sanctuary cities are the very pinnacle of hypocritical Virtue Signaling; it shows their beliefs yet costs them nothing. But it does cost other people, and they are blind to the people they hurt.

According to a House Judiciary Committee, “as of June 2015, more than 17,000 detainers (people who have not been turned over to ICE) had been released by local Sanctuary Jurisdictions”. Here are some more figures:

* 63% of freed individuals held prior serious criminal records.* More than 5,000 were previously considered a “Public safety Concern”.* 1,900 released offenders were later arrested 4,300 times (during the 8 months the study took place).

Resist the OccupationWhy pro-illegal politicians should register as foreign agents.

By Lloyd Billingsley

FrontPageMag.com, March 24, 2017. . .Those would be foreign nationals, whose own governments encourage and abet their flight to the United States, and who in some cases oppose the return of their own citizens. Those who allocate taxpayer money to aid illegals are putting the interests of those governments above the established U.S. law they swear to uphold. In effect, they are acting on behalf of those governments who do not want the United States to deport their citizens.

The Foreign Agents Registration Act includes those who act “in the interests” of a foreign government. For example, Gen. Michael Flynn, as the New York Times observed, “worked as a foreign agent last year representing the interests of the Turkish government in a dispute with the United States.”

The FARA also includes those who act as a “public relations counsel” for a foreign principal. The Act also regards a foreign agent as one who “solicits, collects, disburses, or dispenses contributions, loans, money, or other things of value for or in the interest of such foreign principal.”

"This is a wall of shame and we don't want any part of it," Assemblyman Phil Ting, D-San Francisco, said in a statement. "Immigrant stories are the history of America and this is a nightmare."

The announcement of the proposal came on Monday, three days after the U.S. Customs and Border Protection requested proposals for "border wall prototypes."

Assembly Bill 946 would require the California Public Employee Retirement System and the California State Teachers Retirement System – the two largest public pension funds in the nation, with investments of $312 billion and $202 billion, respectively – to liquidate investments in any company involved with the wall's construction within a year. It would also require the pension-fund management to report a list of those companies to the Legislature.

Messages to state GOP lawmakers seeking comment were not returned Monday afternoon.

The proposal will be carried by Ting and Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, D-San Diego, and Eduardo Garcia, D-Coachella.

If the bill passes, it will discourage California contractors from bidding on wall construction. That means a loss of hundreds of jobs – many of which would go to both immigrants and illegal aliens. Instead, those companies involved in successful bidding on the wall could bring in workers from other states.

It takes a special kind of idiot to become so slavishly devoted to a political agenda that a politician would harm his own constituents.

The legislation has a good chance of passing, considering the massive advantage in the state legislature by Democrats. What would be California's loss could easily become another state's gain as Golden State politicians look to punish their state because someone in Washington is finally trying to address the problem of massive illegal immigration.

In 24 States, 50% or More of Babies Born on Medicaid; New Mexico Leads Nation With 72%

New Mexico led all states with 72 percent of the babies born there in 2015 having their births covered by Medicaid.

Arkansas ranked second with 67%; Louisiana ranked third with 65 percent; and three states—Mississippi, Nevada and Wisconsin—tied for fourth place with 64 percent of babies born there covered by Medicaid.

New Hampshire earned the distinction of having the smallest percentage of babies born on Medicaid. In that state, Medicaid paid for the births of only 27 percent of the babies born in 2015.

Virginia and Utah tied for the next to last position, with 31 percent of the babies born on Medicaid.

However, according to KFF, some of the nation’s most populous states shared the distinction of having 50 percent or more of the babies born there born on Medicaid.

In California, Florida and Illinois, for example, 50 percent of all babies were born on Medicaid in the latest year on record.

In New York, 51 percent of the babies were born on Medicaid.

In Ohio, 52 percent of babies were born on Medicaid.

The Kaiser Family Foundation gathered its data on the number of babies born on Medicaid in each state by surveying the state Medicaid directors.

“Medicaid directors were asked to provide the most recent available data on the share of all births in their states that were financed by Medicaid,” said a KFF report[3].

“About half of the states were able to provide data for calendar 2015 or fiscal year 2015,” said KFF. “Other states generally provided data from 2013 or 2014. On average, states reported that Medicaid pays for just over 47 percent of all births.”

“Eight states (Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina and West Virginia) reported that Medicaid pays for 60 percent or more of all births in their state,” reported KFF.

The KFF survey said data from Hawaii was not available.

A study published by the journal “Women’s Health Issues”[4] in 2013 looked at births covered by Medicaid in the years 2008, 2009, 2010. The report said it was trying to establish a “baseline” for Medicaid-covered birth before the Affordable Care Act’s—AKA Obamacare’s—expansion of Medicaid kicked in.

“Starting in 2014,” said this report, “some states will extend Medicaid to thousands of previously uninsured, low-income women. Given this changing landscape, it is important to have a baseline of current levels of Medicaid financing for births in each state.”

That study, done by researchers at George Washington University and the March of Dimes, determined that in 2008, 40.08 percent of the births in the United States were covered by Medicaid; and that, in 2009, 43.89 percent were covered by Medicaid.

By 2010, according this report, the percentage of births in the United States covered by Medicaid had risen to 47.75 percent—or 1,805,151 out of 3,780,519 total births.

Another report, published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention[5] later in December 2013, looked at the form of payment for births in the 33 states and the District of Columbia that as of 2010 had adopted the 2003 version of “U.S. Standard Certificate for Live Birth.” This certificate specifically asks the mother to say which of four categories the payment for her child’s birth falls into: private insurance, Medicaid, self-pay, or other.

This data, according to the CDC, covered all 2010 births in the 33 states and the District of Columbia, which accounted for 76 percent of all births in the nation in that year. According to the CDC, this data revealed that 44.9 percent of the babies born in these jurisdictions in 2010 were born on Medicaid.

In this 2010 CDC data for 33 states, New Mexico also led with the highest percentage of births on Medicaid—with 57.5 percent of all babies born there that year having their births covered by Medicaid.

In California, Florida and Illinois, for example, 50 percent of all babies were born on Medicaid in the latest year on record.

In California, illegals can vote: it’s possible and very likely. California’s automatic motor-voter law all but assures that illegals seeking driver’s licenses will get a ballot along with their license.

Miscreants from any corner of the world can register to vote in California online, too. No vetting, no assurance, no integrity.

Voter fraud in broken inner city hellholes like Detroit and New York City cannot compare with the ballot stuffing throughout the once Golden State.

“The lifetime costs of Social Security and Medicare benefits of illegal immigrant beneficiaries of President Obama’s executive amnesty would be well over a trillion dollars, according to Heritage Foundation expert Robert Rector’s prepared testimony for a House panel obtained in advance by Breitbart News.”

MEXICO’S CITY of SANTA ANA, in the ORANGE COUNTY, California should secede and join Mexico.

Montgomery County, Md., is one of the richest counties in the country. It’s also an extremely left-wing progressive county that prides itself on being “welcoming,” which is liberal code for a sanctuary county. The sanctuary status is not official, according to county leaders. They pretend they aren’t fully on board with sanctuary policies because they don’t want to lose federal money, but they are.

That unofficial status pushed the city of Rockville to out-liberal its county and push to put their sanctuary status on the books, taking steps in that direction just two weeks ago. A new horrific crime may put that dream on hold.

The so-called sanctuary movement gave illegal aliens permission to rob, rape, and murder Americans by stigmatizing immigration enforcement. There is no universally accepted definition of what constitutes a sanctuary jurisdiction but there are hundreds of jurisdictions around the country that resist U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in the execution of their duties. In addition to Maryland, California is well on its way to becoming a sanctuary state.

According to Jessica Vaughan, policy director at the Center for Immigration Studies, sanctuary policies endanger the public. “It’s a disgrace that the Maryland Assembly is working harder for illegal aliens than it is for the Marylanders who are harmed by illegal immigration.”

“The lifetime costs of Social Security and Medicare
benefits of illegal immigrant beneficiaries of President Obama’s executive amnesty
would be well over a trillion dollars, according to Heritage Foundation expert Robert
Rector’s prepared testimony for a House panel obtained in advance by Breitbart
News.”

In 24 States, 50% or More of Babies Born on Medicaid; New Mexico Leads Nation With 72%

New Mexico led all states with 72 percent of the babies born there in 2015 having their births covered by Medicaid.

Arkansas ranked second with 67%; Louisiana ranked third with 65 percent; and three states—Mississippi, Nevada and Wisconsin—tied for fourth place with 64 percent of babies born there covered by Medicaid.

New Hampshire earned the distinction of having the smallest percentage of babies born on Medicaid. In that state, Medicaid paid for the births of only 27 percent of the babies born in 2015.

Virginia and Utah tied for the next to last position, with 31 percent of the babies born on Medicaid.

However, according to KFF, some of the nation’s most populous states shared the distinction of having 50 percent or more of the babies born there born on Medicaid.

In California, Florida and Illinois, for example, 50 percent of all babies were born on Medicaid in the latest year on record.

In New York, 51 percent of the babies were born on Medicaid.

In Ohio, 52 percent of babies were born on Medicaid.

The Kaiser Family Foundation gathered its data on the number of babies born on Medicaid in each state by surveying the state Medicaid directors.

“Medicaid directors were asked to provide the most recent available data on the share of all births in their states that were financed by Medicaid,” said a KFF report[3].

“About half of the states were able to provide data for calendar 2015 or fiscal year 2015,” said KFF. “Other states generally provided data from 2013 or 2014. On average, states reported that Medicaid pays for just over 47 percent of all births.”

“Eight states (Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina and West Virginia) reported that Medicaid pays for 60 percent or more of all births in their state,” reported KFF.

The KFF survey said data from Hawaii was not available.

A study published by the journal “Women’s Health Issues”[4] in 2013 looked at births covered by Medicaid in the years 2008, 2009, 2010. The report said it was trying to establish a “baseline” for Medicaid-covered birth before the Affordable Care Act’s—AKA Obamacare’s—expansion of Medicaid kicked in.

“Starting in 2014,” said this report, “some states will extend Medicaid to thousands of previously uninsured, low-income women. Given this changing landscape, it is important to have a baseline of current levels of Medicaid financing for births in each state.”

That study, done by researchers at George Washington University and the March of Dimes, determined that in 2008, 40.08 percent of the births in the United States were covered by Medicaid; and that, in 2009, 43.89 percent were covered by Medicaid.

By 2010, according this report, the percentage of births in the United States covered by Medicaid had risen to 47.75 percent—or 1,805,151 out of 3,780,519 total births.

Another report, published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention[5] later in December 2013, looked at the form of payment for births in the 33 states and the District of Columbia that as of 2010 had adopted the 2003 version of “U.S. Standard Certificate for Live Birth.” This certificate specifically asks the mother to say which of four categories the payment for her child’s birth falls into: private insurance, Medicaid, self-pay, or other.

This data, according to the CDC, covered all 2010 births in the 33 states and the District of Columbia, which accounted for 76 percent of all births in the nation in that year. According to the CDC, this data revealed that 44.9 percent of the babies born in these jurisdictions in 2010 were born on Medicaid.

In this 2010 CDC data for 33 states, New Mexico also led with the highest percentage of births on Medicaid—with 57.5 percent of all babies born there that year having their births covered by Medicaid.

In California, Florida and Illinois, for example, 50 percent of all babies were born on Medicaid in the latest year on record.

Obama devastated Black owned Banks

uary 17, 2017. (ONN) Republicans argue that Democratic Party
policies, especially those of the Barack Obama administration, have devastated
the black community in America. But one rarely mentioned example is the
devastating effect the Obama administration had on black-owned banks in the US.
From 2008-2016, they failed at a greater rate than at any other time in modern
history, and in greater proportion than the rest of the banking industry.

But you’ll never hear that on your TV set or even from other
black-owned businesses. Take an article published last month by WatchTheYard.com,
which bills itself as ‘a total revolution of the black college experience.’
Their site was at the top of the results of a Google search for the number of
black-owned banks in the US by year. The only problem is that their numbers are
completely false.

By the numbers

The website claims there are 38 black-owned banks in America
today. But a story two weeks ago in the Chicago Sun Times puts that number at a
mere 24. NerdWallet.com claims there are only 23.
And industry experts warn that number will fall to just 4 by 2028. Consider
that in 1986, during the heart of a 12-year Republican reign, there were 44
black-owned banks in America. By 2007, the year Barack Obama was elected
President, the number had dropped slightly to 41.

By the end of Barack Obama’s 8-year Presidency, the number of
black-owned banks shrunk to just 23. That’s a 44 percent plunge. Some may wish
to blame it on the great recession. But during the same time period, US banks
overall fell from 7,100 to 5,100 - a drop of just 28 percent.

Failed policies

Anyone who follows financial news knows what America’s small
bankers think of Barack Obama. For eight years, they complained that only the
largest dozen or so banks received the trillion-dollar government bailout while
the other 99.9 percent of the country’s banks were left to fend for themselves,
causing nearly a third of them to go bankrupt.

Another example was the Obama administration’s policies of ‘too
big to fail’ and ‘too big to jail’. While thousands of small town banks went
bankrupt and countless small town bankers were jailed for corruption or
incompetence over those eight years, not a single Wall Street bank was allowed
to fail and not a single banker from the nation’s largest banks went to prison.

Biggest crime in history

Consider another example that is blacked-out by the American
news industry - the greatest crime in history. In 2013, the Obama Justice
Department settled with a handful of the country’s largest banks including
Wells Fargo, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup. The banks had
wrongly foreclosed on and taken possession of the homes of over 4 million
American families. The homeowners owed no money and had no mortgages or ties to
the banks that stole their homes with the help of local Sheriff’s Departments
across the country.

First, the Obama administration capped the number of victims its
Justice Department would represent at 4 million, meaning an unknown number of
Americans were out of luck all together. The 4 million proven victims didn’t
fare much better however. The Justice Dept forced the banks to pay back an
average of $500 per family. That’s it.

Four million American families lost their homes for no reason
other than theft and instead of forcing the banks to give back the houses or
reimburse the victims for the full amount stolen, the Obama Justice Dept
ordered the banks to pay back just $3.6 billion to the victims. The banks were
allowed to keep the homes and an estimated $200 billion in stolen property.

Small town banks, and black-owned banks specifically, were not
so lucky under the Obama administration. Unlike the giant Wall Street banks,
they didn’t receive a penny of the trillion-dollar bank bailout and they
weren’t given a license to steal. They simply don’t have the same mutually
beneficial relationship with the leaders of both major political parties that
the Wall Street titans have. The lesson of the Obama years - the smaller your
bank or business, the less the establishment cares about you.

As a closing thought, consider these two facts: not a single
black-owned US bank has $1 billion in assets and it would take 45,000
black-owned banks to equal the size of Wells Fargo.

$700 Billion
Bank Bailout was Secretly $7 Trillion

By Mark
Wachtler

November 30, 2011.
Washington. (ONN) In 2008, President Bush, Secretary Paulson and Chairman
Bernanke crafted a bank bailout program they termed TARP or the Toxic Asset
Relief Program. It was created in the middle of the night, over a weekend,
because if they didn’t act by Monday they said, there wouldn’t be an America
anymore. With confusion and fear in his eyes, President Bush handed the reins
of power to the former CEO of Goldman Sachs. And instead of limiting himself to
the $700 billion Congress grudgingly approved, Hank Paulson printed $7 trillion
dollars, funneled it through the Federal Reserve and handed it over to the
world’s biggest banks with no strings attached and in total secrecy.

Hank Paulson, former Goldman Sachs CEO and architect of the bank
bailouts

While watching Whiteout
Press’ favorite morning business show, 'In Business with Margaret Brennan' onBloombergTV, the show was interrupted by a
startling announcement. Bloomberg investigators had uncovered details that the
most powerful men in Washington and New York were desperate to keep secret. In
fact, Bloomberg had to sue the Federal government for access to the events of
2009 and 2010 regarding the US bank bailout. The Federal Reserve however,
insisted all details of the largest bank bailout in the history of the world
had to be kept completely secret from the American people.

The government fought
releasing the secret details all the way the US Supreme Court. Earlier this
year, Bloomberg won their lawsuit. Treasury and the FED weren’t going to
surrender to the American people that easy however. The FED turned over 29,000
documents and details of 21,000 transactions made during the time period
covered by TARP and the nation’s bank bailout. Attempting to handcuff Bloomberg
investigators with an avalanche of documentation, imagine their surprise when
Margaret Brennan’s show was interrupted yesterday with the unbelievable news
that the bank bailout American’s were led to believe was only $700 billion, was
actually $7.77 trillion. According to the NY Fed, the total amount of US
currency in circulation in the entire world at the time was only $829 billion.

While the events are
difficult to follow for anyone who’s not familiar with the strange way
America’s banking and economic system works, not to mention all the government
and Wall Street secrecy, here’s a novice’s view of what happened during the
panicked early days of America’s economic collapse. When the $700 billion bank
bailout authorized by Congress wasn’t going to be anywhere near enough to save
banks like Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Citigroup and Bank of America, Ben
Bernanke and the FED opened up the nation’s discount borrowing window – to the
tune of $7.77 trillion dollars.

Republican Presidential
candidate Ron Paul (R-TX) could do a much better job of explaining the almost
criminal nature of the FED than this Whiteout Press author ever could. With his
pledge to abolish the FED, Rep Paul might explain – imagine you Joe Citizen
walk into your city hall and ask for a $10 billion dollar loan at zero percent
interest. They give you, and only you, that loan because you’re ‘special’. You
then loan that $10 billion out to others at 5, 10 or 20 percent yearly interest
for things like homes, which are guaranteed by the taxpayers, so there’s no
risk of nonpayment. When that $15 or $20 billion is paid back to you, you pay
back the FED the original $10 billion and keep the rest.

Instead of loaning that
$7.77 trillion to the American people as the American government intended,
banks throughout the world took advantage of the US taxpayer and used that
money to secretly cover massive losses the banks were suffering from their
stupidly investing in their own worthless financial instruments – instruments
the banks knew were worthless and doomed to fail. Like a modern day shell game,
trillions of dollars floated from one banking institution to another, appearing
to fill all balance sheet holes everywhere. Not all the banks used the money to
fill holes however. Some used it to make massive profits.

TheBloomberg reportingrevealed banks like Barclays, Banco
Santander and BNP Parabas made a fortune on the US taxpayer program. Barclays
turned their money into a $26.7 billion profit. Banco Santander profited $29.2
billion and BNP Parabas made $17.1 billion.

They weren’t alone.
According to Bloomberg’s data, 97 different financial institutions around the
globe turned their ‘discount window’ into profits during the two years of the
financial crisis. The most suspicious part – the US government insisted on
keeping every single transaction a secret. In one day alone at the end of 2008,
the Federal Reserve gave out $1.2 trillion dollars to banks – the most on any
day before or since.

For those who remember,
Bank of America was accused of using its funds not to bailout underwater
homeowners, but instead to purchase a bank in China. Bank of America made a
profit of $14.2 billion using their ‘special’ discount borrowing privilege.
Bank of America wasn’t the only player in the middle of the US financial
collapse that made massive profits off the US taxpayer. Wells Fargo made $12.1
billion. JP Morgan made $13.8 billion, Goldman Sachs made $12.7 billion,
American Express made $1.4 billion, Discover made $1.4 billion, US Bancorp
profited $7.2 billion, HSBC made $11.6 billion, PNC Financial $1.4 billion, Lloyds
made $9.6 billion and the list goes on and on.

Not all the banks that
made massive profits off the US taxpayers during the peak of the financial
crisis were well-known American brands. Foreign banks also made billions in
profits, including the National Australia Bank, Bank of Toronto, Mitsubishi,
Skandinavista, Chang Hwa, the Israel Discount Bank and dozens more.

Not all banks used the US
taxpayers to make billions in extra profits. Some banks tried, and lost.

Among the banks that lost
money on the secret loan program were Citigroup, losing $29.3 billion, Royal
Bank of Scotland lost $45.3 billion, Credit Suisse lost $4.1 billion, Deutsche
Bank lost $433 million, Fifth Third lost $1 billion, Wachovia lost $31.6
billion, Merrill Lynch lost $35.9 billion, Arab Banking lost $77 million,
Allied Irish Banks lost $3.4 billion, Morgan Stanley lost $3 billion,
Industrial Bank of Korea lost $559 million and the list goes on and on.

Readers can take their
pick regarding which aspect of this story to be most angry about. Some will be
outraged that for-profit banks are taking advantage of the US taxpayer and
making billions in free money. Others will be angry that based on the above
list, it appears the US taxpayer is also guaranteeing the profits of foreign
banks all over the world. And some will be outraged by the fact that the entire
story was kept secret from not only the American people, but also their
representative in Congress and even officials at the FED.

Bloomberg asked one
longtime critic of giant banks, Rep. Sherrod Brown (D-OH), to comment. “When
you see the dollars the banks got, it’s hard to make the case these were
successful institutions,” she says, “This is an issue that can unite the Tea
Party and Occupy Wall Street. There are lawmakers in both parties who would
change their votes now.”

Bloomberg also quotes
other individuals who should have been aware of what was going on, but weren’t.
Gary H. Stern, Minneapolis FED Chairman at the time, insists he, “wasn’t aware
of the magnitude.” Rep. Brad Miller (D-NC), member of the House Financial
Services Committee, says, “TARP at least had some strings attached. With the
Fed programs, there was nothing.”

Misleading Shareholders

With hindsight being
20/20, Bloomberg looked at some of the biggest emergency borrowers and compared
their financial situation with the outlook and forecasts made by the bank’s
CEO’s to their shareholders. One such example is Ken Lewis, CEO of Bank of
America. On November 26, 2008 he informed shareholders that BofA was, “one of
the strongest and most stable major banks in the world.” We’ll let you the
reader decide - Bank of America owed the US government a staggering $86 billion
on that day.

Another example is JP
Morgan Chase’s CEO Jamie Dimon. On March 26, 2010, he reassured his
shareholders that JP Morgan didn’t need a bailout and only participated in the
program in the beginning, “at the request of the Federal Reserve to help
motivate others to use the system.” In reality, JP Morgan was still taking
advantage of the emergency program and owed the US government $48 billion
dollars more than a year after the program began.

As far as the American
people go, the two Representatives of theirs in Congress that should have been
made aware of what was going on, weren’t. Both the Republican and Democratic
overseers of the massive bank bailout, Rep. Judd Gregg (R-NH) and Rep. Barney
Frank (D-MA), both confirmed to Bloomberg they were kept in the dark.

Most Americans couldn’t
explain how banks function or how the bank bailout worked if their lives
depended on it. But most assume the US taxpayer loaned billions to banks to
save the industry and avoid economic collapse, rampant unemployment and a
housing crash. But if one were to take a step back and look at the new
landscape, a new picture emerges of what the bank bailout was really about. In
the five years from before the crisis in 2006 to after the crisis in 2011, the
six largest US banks increased their assets, or money and property they own,
from $6.8 trillion dollars to $9.5 trillion.

Dallas Federal Reserve
President Richard Fisher summed up the thoughts of many when he called that
fact, “un-American”. For more information about the US economic collapse, read
the Whiteout Press Special Report, ‘What Caused America’s
Economic Collapse’. Special thanks toBloomberg Marketplacefor their detailed reporting.

December 4, 2012

List of Goldman Sachs employees in the White House

December 4, 2012. Washington. At best, it’s considered a revolving door for powerful individuals between Wall Street and the White House. At worst, it’s an economic coup that has been successful in infiltrating and subverting the United States federal government. What is it? The multi-national global banking syndicate known as Goldman Sachs. And more and more, its employees and the federal government’s employees are becoming one and the same.

In this Raymond Balze painting from the 1850's, Jesus chistises the 'money changers' in the Temple, and by doing so, a major tenent in the Christian faith is born.

Goldman Sachs and the White House

The following list was compiled by Nachumlist.com and published in May 2012. With a new Obama administration taking control after the first of the year, the below names will change somewhat. Many of the current White House staff and paid advisers will go back to their Wall Street firms, such as Goldman Sachs. While new Wall Street power players, many of the same individuals from previous Presidential administrations, will take their place.

What follows is a list of Goldman Sachs employees and paid agents who have moved over to positions in the Barack Obama White House. The second list below includes many additional Goldman Sachs employees who were hired by the Bush administration and were hold-overs into President Obama’s first term. The third and final list reflects the Goldman Sachs individuals who have moved on to positions at other global or foreign governments and institutions.

The Money Lenders

As we can see, and federal and state election disclosures confirm, Goldman Sachs has little or no loyalty to either the Republicans or the Democrats. The global bank is a major partner in administrations from both parties, contributes to both parties, and some would argue, controls both parties. This battle between the citizens of a country against the self-serving power and influence of the global banking cartel is not new. In fact, it’s been going on since Biblical times when Christianity banned ‘usury’ – the charging of interest on loans or debts.

For a detailed and historical recap, read the Whiteout Press Special Report, ‘The Illuminati’.

The following two historical quotes sum up the eternal struggle that still goes on today:

“Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.” – Mayer Amschel Rothschild, 1790.

“History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.” – James Madison, 4th President of the United States.

Showing that this eternal struggle - between those cursed with a sickness of unquenchable greed versus those they prey upon – is alive and well even today, the following list presents many of today’s individuals who’ve left their multi-million dollar positions at Goldman Sachs to take a powerful and influential roll inside the White House.

Naming Names – The List

*Note: A number of the below names reference 'The Hamilton Project', a Brookings Institute owned political and policy think tank and advisory organization.

Thomas Donilon: Deputy National Security Adviser (despite having a career that is mostly involved with domestic politics). Donilon was a lawyer at O’Melveny and Myers and made almost $4 million representing meltdown clients including Penny Pritzker (of Chicago) and Goldman Sachs.

William C. Dudley: President and Chief Executive Officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, partner and managing director at Goldman Sachs and was the firm’s chief U.S. economist for a decade.

Douglas Elmendorf: Obama Director of the Congressional Budget Office in January 2009, replaced Furman as Director of the Hamilton Project (Note that the Hamilton Project was funded by Robert Rubin and Goldman Sachs).

Rahm Emanuel: Obama Chief of Staff, on the payroll of Goldman Sachs receiving $3,000 per month from the firm to “introduce us to people", in the words of one Goldman Sachs partner at the time.

Michael Frohman: Robert Rubin’s Chief of Staff while Rubin served as Secretary of the Treasury and an Obama “head hunter” according to “Rubin Proteges Change Their Tune as They Join Obama’s Team” in the New York Times.

Anne Fudge: Appointed to Obama budget deficit reduction committee. Fudge has been the PR craftsman for some of America’s largest corporations. She sits, according to the Washington Post, as a Trustee of the Brookings Institution within which the Hamilton Project is embedded.

Jason Furman: Directed economic policy for the Obama Presidential Campaign, served as the second Director of the Hamilton Project after Peter Orszag’s departure for the Obama administration.

Mark Gallogly: Sits on the Hamilton Project’s advisory council. He is also, according to Wikipedia, currently a member of President Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board.

Timothy Geithner: Secretary of the Treasury, former President of the New York Fed. a former managing director of Goldman Sachs.

Michael Greenstone: The 4th Director of the Hamilton Project. Just as attorney Craig went from advising Obama to defending Goldman Sachs against the SEC complaint, Greenstone has used the revolving door to go from an Obama economic adviser position to one of the Goldman Sachs outlets - in this case its think tank embedded in the Brookings Institution and funded by Goldman Sachs and Robert Rubin. All 3 previous Directors of the Hamilton Project work in the Obama administration.

Neel Kashkari: Served under Treasury Secretary Paulson (a former Goldman Sachs CEO) and was kept on by Obama after his inauguration for a limited period to work on TARP oversight. Former Vice President of Goldman Sachs in San Francisco where he led Goldman’s Information Technology Security Investment Banking practice.

Karen Kornbluh: (Sometimes called "Obama’s brain") Obama Ambassador to the OECD. Was Deputy Chief of Staff to 'Mr. Goldman Sachs', Robert Rubin.

Jacob "Jack" Lew: The United States Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources. According to Wikipedia, Lew sits on the Brookings-Rubin funded Hamilton Project Advisory Board. He also served with Robert Rubin in Bill Clinton’s cabinet as Director of OMB.

David Lipton: Now on Obama’s National Economic Council and the National Security Council. Lipton worked with Larry Summers and Timothy Geithner on the US response to the Asian financial crisis of the 1990’s. MergeFoundations reports that Lipton worked closely with Robert Rubin.

Barack Obama: Obama owes his career to Goldman Sachs which was not only his biggest financial contributor when he ran for the Presidency, but was also his biggest contributor when he ran for the US Senate.

Peter Orszag: Obama Budget Director. Founding director of the Hamilton Project, funded by Goldman Sachs and Robert Rubin. Wikipedia indicates that Robert Rubin, Goldman’s ex-CEO, was one of Orszag’s mentors.

Steve Ratner: The shady billionaire financier who Obama appointed as his “car czar” and who resigned after it was revealed that his company, the Quadrangle Group, was apparently involved in “pay to play” for a billion dollars or so of New York State pension funds, and was under possible indictment by the New York AG and the SEC. Sits on the Advisory Council of the Goldman funded Hamilton Project.

Robert Reischauer: A member of the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission from 2000-2009 and was its Vice Chair from 2001-2008. He too sits on the Hamilton Project’s advisory board.

Robert Zoellick: Bush II Administration: United States Trade Representative (2001-2005), Deputy Secretary of State (2005-2006), World Bank President (2007 -). Former Goldman Sachs Title: Vice Chairman, International (2006-07).

Wikileaks exposes Obama’s bankster-infested

administration!

BARACK OBAMA …… the banksters’ RENT BOY!

“Citigroup’s recommendations came just
three days after then-President George W. Bush signed into law the
Troubled Asset Relief Program, which allocated $700 billion
in taxpayer money to rescue the largest Wall Street banks. The single
biggest beneficiary was Citigroup, which was given $45 billion
in cash in the form of a government stock purchase, plus a $306
billion government guarantee to back up its worthless mortgage-related
assets.”

“As president, Obama not
only funneled trillions of dollars to the banks, he saw to it that not a
single leading Wall Street executive faced prosecution for the orgy of speculation and
swindling that led to the financial collapse and Great Recession, and
he personally intervened to block legislation capping executive pay at bailed-out
firms.”

“So
when Clinton was hobnobbing with Goldman Sachs CEO Blankfein in 2013,
while investigations of wrongdoing by Goldman and the other
Wall Street banks were still ongoing, she was consorting with a man
who belonged in prison.”

NO PRESIDENT IN HISTORY SUCKED IN MORE BRIBES FROM BANKSTERS
NOR INFESTED HIS ADMIN WITH BANKSTER CRONIES MORE THAN OBAMA!

*

And
while the Obama administration worked systematically to bail out the banks and
make the financial oligarchy richer than ever, shielding the architects of the
Great Recession from criminal prosecution, it did impose fines for some of the
banks’ grossest swindles, including the sale of worthless subprime
mortgage-backed securities, the rigging of key global interest rates such as
the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor), drug money laundering, illegal home
foreclosures and other illicit activities.

HSBC laundered hundreds of
millions and perhaps billions of dollars for drug cartels responsible
for the deaths of tens of thousands of people over the past
two decades. The bank transferred at least $881 million of known drug
trafficking proceeds, including money from the Sinaloa Cartel in Mexico, which is known for
dismembering its victims and publicly displaying their body parts.

NO PRESIDENT IN HISTORY SUCKED IN MORE BRIBES FROM BANKSTERS
NOR INFESTED HIS ADMIN WITH BANKSTER CRONIES MORE THAN OBAMA!

And
while the Obama administration worked systematically to bail out the banks and
make the financial oligarchy richer than ever, shielding the architects of the
Great Recession from criminal prosecution, it did impose fines for some of the
banks’ grossest swindles, including the sale of worthless subprime
mortgage-backed securities, the rigging of key global interest rates such as
the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor), drug money laundering, illegal home
foreclosures and other illicit activities.