There are still 59 people facing multiple
felony charges after being mass arrested during the Inauguration Day
protests on January 20, 2017 (J20) in Washington, DC. After an initial
"felony rioting" indictment (which is already unusual),
prosecutors pushed for a series of revisions—pulling in more
defendants and bringing each person's total charges to a
staggering 7+ felonies and up to 61 years in prison.

In December 2017, 6 of the 194 defendants
were acquitted in the first trial. Then, in a surprise move on January
18, 2018, the US Attorney’s Office announced the dismissal of charges
against 129 of the remaining 188 defendants. The charges dismissed
were done so “without prejudice,” though, which is a legal term that
means the Trump administration can re-file charges at any time at its
discretion. And the Trump administration is still proceeding with its
prosecution of 59 defendants, with trials starting in May and going
throughout the year. We see the narrowing of the defendant pool for
what it is: a scare tactic and renewed effort to try to secure as many
convictions as possible.

Under dubious and flimsy legal standards, prosecutors under
the Trump presidency are attempting to turn protesters into felons
and working to set dangerous legal precedents for all those who
work for change.

These cases have disrupted the lives of the J20 defendants, who have
lost jobs, incurred legal expenses, and been forced to make repeated
trips to DC.

Despite these circumstances, there has been an astonishing
display of solidarity—with almost two hundred
people committed to fighting these charges. These
defendants are investing in collective legal strategies when possible,
using solidarity and mutual support to keep each other safe, and are
choosing to go to trial and fight the charges instead of accepting
plea deals.

We have the collective power to do everything we can to stop the
Trump administration from destroying the lives of these defendants,
people who could just as easily be you or me or your friends or
family. And who will be next? Already there is a bipartisan effort to
have the Department of Justice classify activists who manually shut
down tar sands pipelines as “domestic terrorists.” But we know who the
real criminals and domestic terrorists are.

What we allow the Trump administration to get away with in these
trials will affect all who fight for a better world. These
prosecutions are historic. But, this is also our opportunity to make
this a historic defeat for them. Your financial support is needed and
endlessly appreciated—will you join this effort?

Funds will be used for legal defense and to support defendants during
trial, funding housing, travel expenses, food, and other support needs
as agreed on by the DCLP and J20 Finance and Fund-Raising Working
Group. For more information about the legal defense effort and
transparent accounting of how the money is being used, please visit defendJ20resistance.org.

Please donate to this historic fight!

The J20 Case

Prosecutors in these cases have demanded vast troves
of website data involving millions of unrelated people, sought warrants
forcing Facebook to silently hand over data without notifying users
while attempting to skirt legal due process, and extracted terabytes
of personal data from any defendant’s cell phone that was unencrypted.
They also raided an organizer’s home in DC, and defendants have had
their personal information leaked online.

At the same time, the prosecution requested a rare
"protective" order to keep defendants from
sharing police body camera footage—shielding the police from public
accountability and complicating efforts to prepare a defense. Perhaps
most disturbingly, prosecutors have balked at their basic,
constitutional duty to disclose individualized evidence—citing the
workload of so many cases (which they created in the first place!).

These cases could set dangerous legal precedents, with widespread
implications for all those who resist, march, rally, protest, and
organize across the continent. It means that at any demonstration, if
someone commits an illegal act (perhaps even a police provocateur),
then the entire demonstration could be subject to conspiracy charges
in addition to the wanton police violence that so often happens in the streets.

Further Context

On January 20, 2017, tens of thousands of people converged in
Washington, DC, for protests to oppose Trump’s inauguration. A
combination of blockades, marches, and festive demonstrations
shattered the spectacle of a quiet transition of power, making it
clear around the world that people do not recognize Trump’s authority.
What could have been a day signaling resignation and defeat became a
moment of defiance and resistance. As such, the protests on J20 set a
tone and precedent for the events that unfolded shortly after,
including the notably successful, mass direct actions at airports
against Trump’s Muslim ban as well as ongoing resistance to
deportations. While Trump and his Far Right foot soldiers have
encountered few meaningful obstacles from liberal politicians in the
halls of power, grassroots resistance has continued to prove a
substantial force.

Unfortunately, with resistance comes repression. In addition to
shooting pepper spray and concussion grenades indiscriminately at
protesters, including children, the elderly, and people with
disabilities, DC police cordoned off an entire block and mass arrested
more than 230 people in an attempt to stop an anticapitalist and
antifascist march. While mass arrests are not unheard of, in this case
arrestees were originally charged with felony riot—a charge that
potentially carries ten years in prison. On April 27, the prosecution
announced additional felony charges against the entire group: inciting
to riot, rioting, conspiracy to riot, and five counts of property destruction.

With these heightened charges, the state is trying to set a precedent
for harsh crackdowns of disruptive protest in the future, so that
Trump can proceed with his agenda unimpeded by anything but symbolic
hand-wringing. This strategy corresponds with a broader wave of
repression and reaction, from the arrests and grand jury
investigations of indigenous water protectors at #StandingRock, to
backlash against #BlackLivesMatter and black-led organizing against
the violence of policing. The arrests at J20 also inform local
strategies for repression, including antiprotest laws that have been
proposed in eighteen different state legislatures, further
criminalizing commonly used tactics like highway takeovers and in some
cases making it legal for drivers to knowingly hit protesters marching
in roadways.

The charges against the J20 defendants are an experiment. If the
courts are able to successfully prosecute those arrested at J20, this
will send a green light to the forces of repression seeking to
contain, control, and eliminate social movements around the country.
Just as all our struggles are connected, we understand these arrests
to represent a real threat to all efforts toward egalitarian forms of
freedom, dignity, and mutualism.

Delete update

Delete milestone

Share this post

Edit your message

Report campaign

Report submitted

Thank you. We take reports like yours very seriously.
Our goal is to keep the community safe.

Please know that we may contact you for more information,
but that we won't notify you personally of our decision.
If the campaign remains available within a few days, it's
likely that we determined it not to be in violation of our
policies.

Thank you. We've already received your previous report.
If the campaign remains available within a few days, it's
likely that we determined it not to be in violation of our
policies.

Record a video

Upload a video

Nothing grabs attention for your cause like a personal
video. Take a minute or two to record one now.
Record a short video message of support.
Or upload one from your device.
You can preview or redo your video before you post it.

Nothing grabs attention for your cause like a personal
video. Upload a short video message of support.
Upload a short video message of support.
Or record one right now.