MmmmBacon:Thank you, Ryan, for killing any chance you might have had of winning the Presidency in 2016. You have almost single-handedly given the Presidency to the Democrats until at least 2020, if not 2024, and for that I again thank you. Oh, and way to learn from the arse-kicking the GOP took in November 2012, Sir.

What a crazy bastard!

I really never understood the phrase "punchable face" until I saw Paul Ryan.

Of all the controversial issues they could have picked to make central to their platform, I for one, am glad that the GOP decided to become the pro-rape party. That's a message that is sure to bring the people out to the polls in huge numbers.

quickdraw:MmmmBacon: Thank you, Ryan, for killing any chance you might have had of winning the Presidency in 2016. You have almost single-handedly given the Presidency to the Democrats until at least 2020, if not 2024, and for that I again thank you. Oh, and way to learn from the arse-kicking the GOP took in November 2012, Sir.

What a crazy bastard!

I really never understood the phrase "punchable face" until I saw Paul Ryan.

His face is quite punchable. When the Revolution comes, while the Lawyers (and politicians) are lined up against the Wall, Paul Ryan will be set aside from the others, with a line of angry women waiting for their turn to either punch him in the face or kick him in the jumblies. A Fiver slipped to the guards gives a lady both options on her turn.

I bet $25 space dollars that a Republican will eventually say: "If there's anything 70's porno has shown me it's that women might say no, but they're into by the time the bass starts playing. " or something very similar in the 2013.

Yes, Grand Old Party, spend your actual "working" time writing up legislation that has little chance of passing the House, NO CHANCE of passing the Senate, and thus has ZERO chance of reaching the President's desk, where it would get vetoed if it did (which it NEVER will), and have about a -150% chance of overriding the veto.

This a valuable use of your time. This is why you get six-figure salaries and benefits and privileges up the ying-yang, to spend your time on shiat that you know is going nowhere.

If When it gets shot down in flames, just write-up another one, and try it again! And again! And again!Hell, try it 10, 15, 30 times!!

But remember folks, it's the teachers and the poor people that are the problem with America.

LeoffDaGrate:OK, so by your reasoning, because a woman carries the unborn child in her womb before birth, that gives her complete control, morally and legally, over the child. That is understandable.

Why then must a woman give up part of that control to a man after birth? Just because a man is capable of caring for the child (feeding, nurturing, teaching, etc.), the woman has already been established as primary care giver by the simple act of carrying the child to term. Why, then, does that change? Do you believe it should change? Isn't the woman always in charge?

well you see Data, the unborn human child is is actually a part of the mother. It is physically attached to her. Her own blood nourishes it. when a human child is born, this is no longer the case, and then the male half, the father, is able to help with the caring of the child as well.

quickdraw:MmmmBacon: Thank you, Ryan, for killing any chance you might have had of winning the Presidency in 2016. You have almost single-handedly given the Presidency to the Democrats until at least 2020, if not 2024, and for that I again thank you. Oh, and way to learn from the arse-kicking the GOP took in November 2012, Sir.

What a crazy bastard!

I really never understood the phrase "punchable face" until I saw Paul Ryan.

You don't even need a phrase. The Germans have a single word, "backpfeifengesicht." Which basically translates into "a face badly in need of a fist."

MmmmBacon:quickdraw: MmmmBacon: Thank you, Ryan, for killing any chance you might have had of winning the Presidency in 2016. You have almost single-handedly given the Presidency to the Democrats until at least 2020, if not 2024, and for that I again thank you. Oh, and way to learn from the arse-kicking the GOP took in November 2012, Sir.

What a crazy bastard!

I really never understood the phrase "punchable face" until I saw Paul Ryan.

His face is quite punchable. When the Revolution comes, while the Lawyers (and politicians) are lined up against the Wall, Paul Ryan will be set aside from the others, with a line of angry women waiting for their turn to either punch him in the face or kick him in the jumblies. A Fiver slipped to the guards gives a lady both options on her turn.

I would definitely go for the face - if only to shut him up. Besides Im not sure he has jumblies.

s2s2s2:cannotsuggestaname: what the fark is wrong with these people? I mean seriously, what is wrong?

Nothing. They are playing their role to a T. This is part of the plan to push you to the left, where you will be more accepting(as you already are) and even defensive of shiatty policy written by the "right", and pushed further forward by the "left".

So in your mind the GOP is trying to be as radical as they can to make the people vote for the Democrats? ??

That is the stupidest conspiracy theory I have ever heard. Stupider than burghers and troothers. Seriously.

MmmmBacon:Thank you, Ryan, for killing any chance you might have had of winning the Presidency in 2016. You have almost single-handedly given the Presidency to the Democrats until at least 2020, if not 2024, and for that I again thank you. Oh, and way to learn from the arse-kicking the GOP took in November 2012, Sir.

What a crazy bastard!

I think he may have been that easy "push" when you finally get over the top, but the GOP had a gob-smackingly huge assortment of stupidity, sociopathic behavior problems, and out-in-daylight larceny helping to get him to that pinnacle of jackassery.

I'm not jewish, but I've been at enough seders to remember there's a part of the hagaddah(sp?) going "without X there couldn't have been Y" and so on. There's a story of that epic scale to be made of the 1992-2012 GOP.

/maybe before then too, but I can vouch for the last 20 years of absolute bag-over-head brain damage.

s2s2s2:cannotsuggestaname: what the fark is wrong with these people? I mean seriously, what is wrong?

Nothing. They are playing their role to a T. This is part of the plan to push you to the left, where you will be more accepting(as you already are) and even defensive of shiatty policy written by the "right", and pushed further forward by the "left".

Amazingly, there is a ray of light in this bill. Cloning. Most of the die hard conservatives reject cloning as contrary to nature. That is the position of the Catholic Church. http://www.americancatholic.org/News/Cloning/default.asp

So the fact that these people are willing to acknowledge that life could begin with cloning is actually rather liberal.

I should hope that if you weren't a right-winger, you'd be intelligent enough to avoid even the possibility of being mistaken as defending this anathematic grandstanding -- which, so far, you have not avoided at all.

I should hope that if you weren't a right-winger, you'd be intelligent enough to avoid even the possibility of being mistaken as defending this anathematic grandstanding -- which, so far, you have not avoided at all.

yeah, intelligent people don't criticize what they view as dubious arguments - even if they agree with the purpose of the argument - for fear that morons like James F. Campbell might mistake them for supporting the target of the criticism.

Then here's the same story from an anti-abortionist website. You are now free to post derp without giving poor ol' Jezebel a clicky-click. You're welcome, candyass.

Jezebel is an abortion of a website written by half-literate tittering shiatheads but I have given it 5 clicks to uphold my promise to click 5 times each time a person announces a refusal to click somewhere. You're doing more harm than good by announcing it.

The way I read it, a state or territory can sue or seek an injunction to prevent an abortion, which is bad enough and terribly written. I don't see any reason to throw in some non-sense about rapists suing or whatever

that's why

At least you're a half-glass full kind of person, since you said they're half-literate

The trick is to get in there and find their reference link as quickly as you can, and then get the hell out of there. Not unlike any other scouting mission. I always feel like my genitals are about to be removed when I go there.

Come to think of it, I get the same feeling at regular Gawker, too. Lifehacker is pretty cool, though.

There are few laws that could be enacted that would increase the likelihood that a woman would want an abortion. I imagine knowing her rapist could sue for custody, and therefore become a permanent part of her life, would do it!