Looks good! You have it pretty easy I would say since the (2) and (4) are being developed N/B the (3) is easy copy and pasting from the (2) Franklin Av to 135th St. Obviously the chaining distances would have to be changed but it's all there, wish you the best.

I agreed bro, if not one is doing the 2 line I would like to takeover the route.

There will be Scenerios based on time of day (IE: Rush hour, Late night etc.) And short turns such as to hunts point, 3av, 125, 86 and grand central. There will also be a scenario with the new experimental shorter automated announcements.

There will be 2 versions of manual announcements one male one female. The female one was done by my niece Evelyn Robinson which she on list to be real conductor, list of scenarios done by her.Pelham Bay Park to Brooklyn Bridge Bronx Express. Parkchester to Brooklyn Bridge Bronx Express.138 St-3rd Avenue to Brooklyn Bridge Bronx Local.Pelham Bay Park to Brooklyn Bridge express in Manhattan and Bronx.

The male version is done by DJ Hammers, list of scenarios done by himPelham Bay Park to Brooklyn bridge Local.Parkchester to Brooklyn Bridge Local.Hunts point to Brooklyn Bridge Local.All other scenarios that not listed above.

That's kind of an obvious question. Routes are being developed in certain directions since merging lines share the same objects. Notice how the (2)(3)(4)(5) are being developed from Brooklyn. As well as finished lines are going in one direction (A)(B)(C)(D), (F)(V).

The developers are working together (4) and (5) lines will be using same object older "Lexington" folder as the (6) lines uses.

Thanks for the clarification. And you don't have to release this to make us happy if you feel this could be better. Speaking for myself and some of the community I'm sure we would wait a few extra months or years for a fully finished product thats up to date instead of different versions. I believe we are seeing that with the (E),(4) and (7) routes in development. They have been in development for almost 7 years and I believe part of the reason is not the developers not having time but because the transition from BVE to OpenBVE as well as higher quality routes and photorealistic technology have plagued time. The (4) serves as an excellent example when it was first started half a decade ago it was using non-photo realistic stuff and over that time to now we've seen numerous changes from the station tile, to tracks, to elevators, and beams.

by the way I will be resume working on A line soon and will be one of most highly detail route similar routes like the (Q) and (4) lines.

6 Line will be worked on again to add or change features to route that was added/change from 2013 to 2015 like station rehabs, other station modification to reflect the changes NYCT made, Around later this spring (around May 2015) when I get a new camera because my camera was stolen by one of the Railfanners at the UTC meeting, This is one of the reasons why 6 is getting release the way it's.

You do have a point.Some stations do look it's 2015 (18 of 38 stations have been upgraded to 2014/15 textures standards).

I see quite a few things that could use some work. I am not nitpicking, albeit the route may be completed I see inaccuracies and basic things that can be improved that we are seeing with the development of the (4)(B)(Q) lines.

The Route was mostly finished back in 2013 thats one of the reasons, some of the objects came from the 4 line.6 Line will be worked on again to add or change features to route that was added/change from 2013 to 2015 like station rehabs, other station modification to reflect the changes NYCT made, Around later this spring (around May 2015) when I get a new camera because my camera was stolen by one of the Railfanners at the UTC meeting, This is one of the reasons why 6 is getting release the way it's.