Blog dedicated to Freedom of Speech and all human beings who are willing to stand up for innocent people caught in this system and against corrupt political entities and opportunistic frauds. Some celebrity gossip also.

This
maniac has been once again advised to CEASE AND DESIST. Sorry to
disturb you. I have no doubt that you have a better way to relate with
your resources. Nevertheless, the corruption in Los Angeles, Leonard
Cohen's tax fraud matter, and Phil Spector's insane situation demand
investigations. So does the entire trial and the Los Angeles City
Attorney. The lies are inconceivable and they understood - all too well
- that the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, and Dennis Riordan were copied
in. I think the IRS was deliberately targeted. Who knows - maybe
Trutanich saw some liability. Anything and everything is possible with
these people, if you can call them people. The ongoing criminal
harassment - by a man aligned with Cohen - over my appeal, writ, and
oral arguments is outrageous - as is the fact that the appellate
division refused to permit me to abandon this appeal. My attorney
advised me that it is my constitutional right. Essentially the
appellate division is saying this - prosecutorial misconduct is fine and
you MUST be exposed to it. That's how I see it. Perhaps they're
covering for their pals in LA Confidential. Hard to say. I hope I
never have to lay eyes on any of these lunatics again in my entire
life. They are nauseatingly vile and revolting. You have to see them
up close and personal to really understand this. It's like stumbling
into some deranged hell realm filled with LIARS and criminals with
motive.

You
have been relentlessly advised to CEASE AND DESIST. I do not want to
hear from a lying maniac with motive who is impersonating a dog while
demeaning my teacher. Write prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter. She likes
liars - see Leonard Cohen whose lies will be addressed in my Writ and
not via stream of consciousness.

I have advised the FBI that I believe you belong in prison.
It's no surprise to me that former so-called Buddhist Leonard Cohen
would align himself with a maniac like you.

My God, this
man is INSANE. Francisco Suarez and I have discussed what he intends to
do and it it not limited to editing my Writ. However, this man knows I
am represented and he continues to criminally harass me while
impersonating a dog. Leonard Cohen did NOT terminate me. He heard I
was reporting his tax fraud to the IRS and I refused to meet with him
and his tax lawyer, hand over the corporate books and records, and
assist them in unraveling their handiwork. Cohen should have problems
explaining his offer of 50% community property but I'm sure he's
carefully crafting some lie or another to cover that situation that Dale
Burgess advised me to let the IRS and Treasury know he would testify
about. Leonard Cohen sexually harassed me. Someone asked me if he
exposed his penis to me while he would soak in a bubble bath and have me
read legal and business documents to him. The answer is yes. In any
event, my lawyer has advised me to forward Gianelli's criminally
harassing emails to the FBI so please see below. This man is
dangerously unstable and clearly OUT OF HIS MIND.

I have not posted my draft Writ on my Blog so this lunatic is
lying about a stream of conscious narrative. Francisco Suarez simply
wants to know the facts and all details which requires explaining it and
we did that in the form of draft sections so we could discuss things
like - prosecutorial misconduct, concealment of exculpatory and
IMPEACHMENT evidence, perjury, etc.

This lunatic appears to be criminally harassing me over the
appeal, writ, oral arguments and seems to be arguing the City Attorney
or Leonard Cohen's case. How fascinating, no? The City Attorney could
care less if she lied through her teeth, elicited perjured testimony,
concealed information, or the fact thatr I was NOT SERVED the
Califoirnia order. I had to be served or notified. It's right there on
the three page document entered into evidence that's missing the proof
of service. In any event, I'[ve addressed all of this ad nauseum and
have no intention of addressing it with a deranged human being who is
impersonating a dog that is demeaning my teacher the 14th Sharmapa which
his revolting. Of course, the City Attorney went right at Sharmapa
also. I suppose his conclusions that I am the victim of corrupt
politicians and law enforcement really disturbs these out of control
maniacs.

I served time in jail because I was railroaded. Period. My
lawyer is very clear about that - as are many others - and that's why he
is convinced that my trial is nothing other than an IRS case that
demands an investigation and involves outrageous testimony about Phil
Spector. The great news - Mick Brown has ethics and knows why I was
under the impression that Cohen's testimonial statements were presented
to Phil Spector's Grand Jury. Just search LA Superior Court's website
under High Profile cases. Go to Phil Spector. Open the motion in
limine dated February 17, 2005 - and voila - there's Leonard Cohen's
brandishing incident that he personally proved was NOT the version he
testified to or emailed Streeter about. These people are sick and have
exposed me to the criminal writing me as a DOGSTER. That's my personal
opinon. Someone should ask Trutanich personally why his prosecutor
permitted Gianelli to copy her in on so many emails criminally harassing
me. His answer will probably be revolting.

First, you are not ebtitled to court appointed counsel to draft your
habeus petition - which is why you are filing it pro se. Mr. Suarez's
offer to "proof read" it for you does not change your pro se status in
that contemplated proceding.

As for sending you the link + excerpts to/from a leading appellate
defender's office habeas manuel, this is NOT "criminal harassment",
particularly where you have posted your every communication with your
appointed counsel on your blog along with your extremely inaccurate
views of the kinds of issues that may be addressed in your circumstances
via habeas petition, your stated intention to draft it yourself in
stream of consciousness narrative form - as illistrated by the draft
petition excerpts you have emailed to a host of third parties and the
blog posted.

Rather, criminal harassment is what you did six months in jail for in 2012.

And,
no, alleged sexual harassment occuring at an unspecified time prior to
your firing seven years ago does not give you license to send your
victims thousands of obscene, profane, and threatening and accusatory
emails or to leave obscene and threatening voice messages in violation
of a Colorado Court Order that you were well aware was permanent in
duration.

As for your dismissing the habeas manuel as "harassment" or
"insane", you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
(The horse in this anology, MsM lynch would be you.)