A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in

Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in

Cancer is caused by a nutritional defficiency that allows cancer virus to grow in body.

No drug can cure a nutritional deficiency. The viruses will just keep coming back untill the deficiency is addressed.

Like only vitamin C can cure scurvy. No drug can cure scurvy.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23127508

+ Inflammation.

Our bodies are pretty amazing.. especially when given the correct nutrition. However, super foods that are anti inflammatory is where its really at. Most degenerative diseases, including cancer, are inflammatory diseases. But your sooOOoo right about nutritional deficiency.. If we weren't deficient, we wouldn't be susceptible to so many ailments.

where are your facts to make such a lamepost,none of the above will cure cancer,sad part is neither will chemo and radiation,what you have listed above gives one false hope,chemo and rads gives the same only with added benefitslike weakness,rashes,internal bleeding,headaches,weight loss,Constipation,diarrhea,hair loss and the list go's on and onSome win most don't,either way.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1568805

OK, Here's one "cocktail:"

ONE part baking soda (NOT with aluminum in it), THREE parts Maple syrup (ALL NATURAL only).Mix & heat, but NOT to boiling.

What does it do?Syrup is sugar....draws cancer cells to it (they LIVE and reproduce by eating sugar)Baking soda kills them by changing the Ph balance in your blood to more alkaline, less acidic.

Take ONE teaspoon once or twice a day.

THAT's how that one works, TARDS.

Vit B17 is also supposed to work, but has - for the most part - been banned (It's laetril...it's supposedly toxic? So what! If someone is facing a death sentence, shouldn't they have the right to try something that MIGHT save them if they want?).

Hemp? Never heard that one'Shrooms? That one neither!

Quoting: MB713 19084541

Do a little more research.. [link to phkillscancer.com] you will find out he raised his PH to 8and kept it there 5 days,a cancer patient in dire straights has no chance in hell to achieve this.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1568805

There is so much wrong with the assumption that mixing sugar with baking soda would kill cancer its laughable if it wasn't dangerous to tell people. Too high blood Ph causes Alkalosis and obviously sugar is converted into glucose and goes to the liver before being used by your cells. So how this "cure" supposedly works is idiotic at best.

Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in

...

where are your facts to make such a lamepost,none of the above will cure cancer,sad part is neither will chemo and radiation,what you have listed above gives one false hope,chemo and rads gives the same only with added benefitslike weakness,rashes,internal bleeding,headaches,weight loss,Constipation,diarrhea,hair loss and the list go's on and onSome win most don't,either way.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1568805

OK, Here's one "cocktail:"

ONE part baking soda (NOT with aluminum in it), THREE parts Maple syrup (ALL NATURAL only).Mix & heat, but NOT to boiling.

What does it do?Syrup is sugar....draws cancer cells to it (they LIVE and reproduce by eating sugar)Baking soda kills them by changing the Ph balance in your blood to more alkaline, less acidic.

Take ONE teaspoon once or twice a day.

THAT's how that one works, TARDS.

Vit B17 is also supposed to work, but has - for the most part - been banned (It's laetril...it's supposedly toxic? So what! If someone is facing a death sentence, shouldn't they have the right to try something that MIGHT save them if they want?).

Hemp? Never heard that one'Shrooms? That one neither!

Quoting: MB713 19084541

Do a little more research.. [link to phkillscancer.com] you will find out he raised his PH to 8and kept it there 5 days,a cancer patient in dire straights has no chance in hell to achieve this.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1568805

There is so much wrong with the assumption that mixing sugar with baking soda would kill cancer its laughable if it wasn't dangerous to tell people. Too high blood Ph causes Alkalosis and obviously sugar is converted into glucose and goes to the liver before being used by your cells. So how this "cure" supposedly works is idiotic at best.

Quoting: Red Harvest

What's just as idiotic is people believing these "cure" testimonials and stories on the internet.

Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in

...

where are your facts to make such a lamepost,none of the above will cure cancer,sad part is neither will chemo and radiation,what you have listed above gives one false hope,chemo and rads gives the same only with added benefitslike weakness,rashes,internal bleeding,headaches,weight loss,Constipation,diarrhea,hair loss and the list go's on and onSome win most don't,either way.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1568805

OK, Here's one "cocktail:"

ONE part baking soda (NOT with aluminum in it), THREE parts Maple syrup (ALL NATURAL only).Mix & heat, but NOT to boiling.

What does it do?Syrup is sugar....draws cancer cells to it (they LIVE and reproduce by eating sugar)Baking soda kills them by changing the Ph balance in your blood to more alkaline, less acidic.

Take ONE teaspoon once or twice a day.

THAT's how that one works, TARDS.

Vit B17 is also supposed to work, but has - for the most part - been banned (It's laetril...it's supposedly toxic? So what! If someone is facing a death sentence, shouldn't they have the right to try something that MIGHT save them if they want?).

Hemp? Never heard that one'Shrooms? That one neither!

Quoting: MB713 19084541

Do a little more research.. [link to phkillscancer.com] you will find out he raised his PH to 8and kept it there 5 days,a cancer patient in dire straights has no chance in hell to achieve this.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1568805

There is so much wrong with the assumption that mixing sugar with baking soda would kill cancer its laughable if it wasn't dangerous to tell people. Too high blood Ph causes Alkalosis and obviously sugar is converted into glucose and goes to the liver before being used by your cells. So how this "cure" supposedly works is idiotic at best.

Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in

I read the entire posted reference article. It took me about 15 minutes or so. FIVE STARS.

Excellent article with great human interest story.

Scientist has cure for cancer but has no backers to fund him. Big Pharma says no to him and red-tape from government makes it just about impossible for scientist to do anything.

If story is true, would be a very good investment for someone. Scientist needs about $2-3 Million.

Quoting: Old Coot

^^This^^

Hopefully someone with deep pockets or fundraising ability will take notice.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22963979

Big Pharma and Government doesn't want a cure. Its better that the person stay sick creating huge payments to Pharmacompanies. Then look at the world population and available food and water. Put them together and we are where we are!

Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in

Frustrating how there's no consenus on what exactly is cancer, is it a virus, fungus, a product of unstoppable cell multiplication fueled by genetic triggers, toxicity, or poor nutrition...

It should be obvious that the earthly powers that be don't want a cure because it would mean population growth and a culling of the cancer business, be it research, medical, or organizational.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1735556

I have to admit I am starting more and more to lean towards this take on things. Just because the average human body contains so many chemicals this theory below could very well pan out to be just what cancer is.

A very close friend, ex-inside linebacker, was given a diagnosis of stage 4 throat cancer, three moths to live. He went to canada for Hemp Oil treatment, illegal here in the states. That was almost three years ago now and he has a 10 month old son.

I had per-cancerous polyps removed from my colon. They left the largest one and went back for it 3 moths later. I had changed my diet to "mostly" raw food, less red meat, and I juice veggies every night ALONG with the maple syrup and baking soda (both organic) and the polyp was biopsied and had no signs of cancer at all.

NO THANKS TO MY GI DOCTOR HERE. He said it, my diet, wouldn't make a difference and started discussing chemo before he went in the for second time.

Screw the AMA. This country is only number 37 from the bottom of 191 countries in health care quality. That puts Arizona in the bottom 7 per cent of 191 countries for health care. Even the feds rate this states' medical system as "dismal at best". And all people are worried about here is Sheriff Joke and his posse.

You've got to be proactive about your health. There's too many people making too much money off us being sick to trust ANY of them.

Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in

I don't see any reason why this can't be investigated further.

Quoting: Cahill

Well here's a reason for you. It's not going to make Big Pharma millions of dollars.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22901085

And you really believe that don't you?

It takes on average $900 million to develop a single drug. Think about it. $900 million. That’s an amount of money that even Bill Gates would have trouble finding down the back of the sofa on a regular basis. Of the drugs that get out of pre-clinical testing, 70% will fail at Phase 1 trial stage. One of the reasons that drug discovery is so expensive is that (apart from the fact that it’s difficult), the pharmaceutical industry is so heavily regulated.

Now I’m not defending Big Pharma. Far from it. I can't stand them. Their price fixing and handling of off-patent drugs in the 3rd world is criminal, they aren’t always transparent with their methods and data and when they mess up, people die. But they exist to make money and if, for example, 1 in 3 people in the Western world will get cancer in their lifetime do you not think that they would exploit a cure, any cure and have us over a barrel to make money from it? Not to mention the kudos, the plaudits, the Nobel Prizes that any scientist would receive if they managed to cure the potentially incurable? The idea that they would regularly throw away close to a billion dollars while sitting on possibly one of the most lucrative ideas of all time is laughable.

Quoting: Cahill

You are forgetting something, there are people out there that want to reduce the population of the world. They treat the disease, they don't cure the disease.

They injected cancer into ww2 veterans. One of the Rockefeller, during that time said it was as good of away to die as any.

Pharma co. were very much into some very bad things.

The cancer charities make a lot of money, you might need to research them and who are the ones running it.

If you put your trust in people, without knowing their back ground, you just might have a treatment that is worse than the disease.

Who do you think was involved in eugenics? Who are they now? Genome study, genetics in all forms, they study peoplelike lab animals.

Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in

Actually, this is NOT a novel treatment. My dad, who suffered from pancreatic islet cell cancer (a form of neuroendocrine tumor), participated in initial trials of the Seneca Valley virus. That vaccine also induced flu-like symptoms, but regrettably was regrettably ineffective in arresting dad's cancer. I trust that future endeavors, like this one, lead to widespread success--cancer is a scourge from hell.

Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in

Actually, this is NOT a novel treatment. My dad, who suffered from pancreatic islet cell cancer (a form of neuroendocrine tumor), participated in initial trials of the Seneca Valley virus. That vaccine also induced flu-like symptoms, but was regrettably ineffective in arresting dad's cancer. I trust that future endeavors, like this one, lead to widespread success--cancer is a scourge from hell.

Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in

Reminds me the film, Iam Legend (Will Smith)

This is the time of each individual recognizing their own identity as an expression of the essential Divine and the same for all others. This is a time of personal responsibility and personal authority, of becoming aware of oneself as the choice maker of our experience.

Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in

A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in a refrigerator in a Swedish laboratory.

Sitting in a refrigerator in a Swedish laboratory is what promises to be a cheap and effective cancer treatment. So why are the trials to bring it to market not going ahead?

On the snow-clotted plains of central Sweden where Wotan and Thor, the clamorous gods of magic and death, once held sway, a young, self-deprecating gene therapist has invented a virus that eliminates the type of cancer that killed Steve Jobs.

'Not "eliminates"! Not "invented", no!' interrupts Professor Magnus Essand, panicked, when I Skype him to ask about this explosive achievement.

'Our results are only in the lab so far, not in humans, and many treatments that work in the lab can turn out to be not so effective in humans. However, adenovirus serotype 5 is a common virus in which we have achieved transcriptional targeting by replacing an endogenous viral promoter sequence by…'

It sounds too kindly of the gods to be true: a virus that eats cancer.

Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in

I don't see any reason why this can't be investigated further.

Quoting: Cahill

Well here's a reason for you. It's not going to make Big Pharma millions of dollars.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22901085

And you really believe that don't you?

It takes on average $900 million to develop a single drug. Think about it. $900 million. That’s an amount of money that even Bill Gates would have trouble finding down the back of the sofa on a regular basis. Of the drugs that get out of pre-clinical testing, 70% will fail at Phase 1 trial stage. One of the reasons that drug discovery is so expensive is that (apart from the fact that it’s difficult), the pharmaceutical industry is so heavily regulated.

Now I’m not defending Big Pharma. Far from it. I can't stand them. Their price fixing and handling of off-patent drugs in the 3rd world is criminal, they aren’t always transparent with their methods and data and when they mess up, people die. But they exist to make money and if, for example, 1 in 3 people in the Western world will get cancer in their lifetime do you not think that they would exploit a cure, any cure and have us over a barrel to make money from it? Not to mention the kudos, the plaudits, the Nobel Prizes that any scientist would receive if they managed to cure the potentially incurable? The idea that they would regularly throw away close to a billion dollars while sitting on possibly one of the most lucrative ideas of all time is laughable.

Quoting: Cahill

You are forgetting something, there are people out there that want to reduce the population of the world. They treat the disease, they don't cure the disease.

They injected cancer into ww2 veterans. One of the Rockefeller, during that time said it was as good of away to die as any.

Pharma co. were very much into some very bad things.

The cancer charities make a lot of money, you might need to research them and who are the ones running it.

If you put your trust in people, without knowing their back ground, you just might have a treatment that is worse than the disease.

Who do you think was involved in eugenics? Who are they now? Genome study, genetics in all forms, they study peoplelike lab animals.

The good one have accidents.

Quoting: Daughter

Look at this way...Medicine, advances in hygiene and better nutritional advice are mainly responsible for the growth in population. Agreed?

Therefore one can argue that the ones promoting these quack cures are responsible for any depopulation...