About the pronunciation of <z>, it was /z/ in the first two Sejuvli forms, then I changed it into /dz/ in the current form just because I find it easier to pronounce. Anyways, that's only my own opinion: I'm actually thinking about making it an allophone for both /dz/ and /z/. So feel free to pronounce it as you prefer, until I decide for good.

About the lack of /v/, you're very ceųnom! (that literally means "who-looks", and describes a person who always pays attention to everything.) That's my fault, it's just a typo.

Same for jun lida so lacev. The correct translation is "we own this house". "That house" would obviously be to lacev.

About se ga, no, ilu must not be paired with it. Ga totally substitutes the pronoun, it doesn't just go with it. So, you say mi pula ga sųo, "I stand up", and absolutely not mi pula mi ga sųo, which would be very very wrong!

About šolan, well, I have to say that Sejuvli verbs tend to be preferably transitive. In this case, though, šolan and matan have different constructions: the former is transitive, the latter is not. Therefore you say mi šola ve, but mi mata na ve. "I'm speaking Sejuvli to you" could be literally translated as mi šola ve Sejuvli, but a native speaker would rather say mi šola ve sa Sejuvli ("I speak to you using Sejuvli") or mi šola ve cųo Sejuvli ("I speak to you in a Sejuvli manner", cfr. Esperanto mi parolas angle), in order to be more straightforward.

Sushika wrote:About se ga, no, ilu must not be paired with it. Ga totally substitutes the pronoun, it doesn't just go with it. So, you say mi pula ga sųo, "I stand up", and absolutely not mi pula mi ga sųo, which would be very very wrong!

Note that ga can also be used as a subject of subordinate clauses, where the main and the subordinate share the same subject. E.g.:he said, that he would come = ilu šolen, le ga lajen šaų* (cfr. Latin ille dixit se venturum esse).

* = the modal particle šaų expresses the future-in-the-past, and is constructed with the past simple.

That seems useful; the two languages I speak fluently don't feature this. I should consider this feature into my language.

Sushika wrote:Note that ga can also be used as a subject of subordinate clauses, where the main and the subordinate share the same subject. E.g.:he said, that he would come = ilu šolen, le ga lajen šaų* (cfr. Latin ille dixit se venturum esse).

Does le mean anything else other than being used for relative clauses? For example, Russian "chto" means "what" but can also serve as a introduction to relative clauses. (e.g. Máma skazála, chto oná poshlá v magazín. or "Mother said that she would go to the store.")

Sushika wrote: The modal particle šaų expresses the future-in-the-past, and is constructed with the past simple.

Are you going to cover that in a separate post soon? I'm looking forward to doing some exercises.

P.S.: I noticed that your [dZ] sound is a g with a breve, not a caron while [S] and [tS] use carons. What is the cause of this irregularity?

That's a minor detail I was curious about, but what I also want to ask is how you type the special characters of your alphabet. To my knowledge, g with a breve and the rest of your characters are on two separate keyboards (the Turkish and Latvian ones, respectively). I used to switch between keyboards when I needed to type characters exclusive to one keyboard, but that drove me nuts and I was forced to adopt the simple International keyboard with no diacritics with consonants. Anyway, I would like to know how you manage to type ğ and ų (and the others). Do you use one keyboard?

Kloiten wrote:Does le mean anything else other than being used for relative clauses? For example, Russian "chto" means "what" but can also serve as a introduction to relative clauses. (e.g. Máma skazála, chto oná poshlá v magazín. or "Mother said that she would go to the store.")

No, it only means "that" to introduce declarative, subjective or objective clauses (Sejuvli tends to be a language of one word for one meaning and viceversa, although there are some exceptions). But notice that you can often use "preposition" + le to form a conjunction. E.g.:

Kloiten wrote:Are you going to cover that in a separate post soon? I'm looking forward to doing some exercises.

Of course!

Kloiten wrote:P.S.: I noticed that your [dZ] sound is a g with a breve, not a caron while [S] and [tS] use carons. What is the cause of this irregularity?

That's a minor detail I was curious about, but what I also want to ask is how you type the special characters of your alphabet. To my knowledge, g with a breve and the rest of your characters are on two separate keyboards (the Turkish and Latvian ones, respectively). I used to switch between keyboards when I needed to type characters exclusive to one keyboard, but that drove me nuts and I was forced to adopt the simple International keyboard with no diacritics with consonants. Anyway, I would like to know how you manage to type ğ and ų (and the others). Do you use one keyboard?

About the difference between the breve and the caron, well, the explanation is simple: I confused the caron and the breve when I started writing Sejuvli on Microsoft Word I know it should be a G with a caron, but when I realized the mistake I decided to keep it, because the difference is really little.

About how I type, well, when writing on MS Word I use the automatic correction. When I write [CTRL] + [c] + ['], for example, it automatically turns into [č]. When posting on Omniglot and other forums, I write the special characters on MS Word and copy-paste them. And when writing down fast notes on my iPhone, I use the alternative spelling (e.g.: č -> ch).

Before I keep going on with the grammar, I'd like to post a sample. It's the Sejuvli translation of this Italian article found on Wikinews. Read it so you can understand how the language actually sounds.