It will still work. If you take a look at the layouts I use for a LOT of our tour guys you'll see that we use double thumbs, p3's and other holes like that to lower RG and raise Diff. I've seen results consistent with the parameters of the gradient line hole method. I wouldn't be afraid to proceed as if it were a boring old core in the ball.

Essentially, all a motion hole does is turn a core into more of a flywheel shape. Given that logic, the best one would be the core with the most flywheel tendencies. The core that would meet that requirement is definitely the Primal Rage.

You should probably do that. It's likely better than my idea as I don't use those at all. I honestly don't think a single ball has come off of the truck with a motion hole. I was just hypothesizing based on the purpose of the hole.

Im not sure what it is about my release specs.... but i absolutely LOVE every motion hole ball ive drilled for myself thus far. If you have a good scientific understanding of how the four different forces that you impart on a ball at the point of release, you would definately look at my specs and assume that motionholes would be terrible for me. 13mph seems rev dominant, but then take into consideration my absolutely absurd amount of axis tilt, and that is almost like immediately adding another 3-4mph to my monitor speed. Therefore realistically making me very much speed dominant.

13mph at monitor220-240rpms45*axis rotationAnd nearly 30* of tilt (closer to 27*)With a PAP of only 3.75 right by 0.25 up41' BRUNSWICK DEFENSE OIL THS ON PROANVILANE

Anyways, my very first motion hole ball was with a short pin (1.5" pin out) incinerate solid. Bc of the short pin, i was forced to go pin down under my ring. Threw it without the hole, and OMG i was so close to throwing this turd in the dumpster lol. It would literrally start to transition at the arrows, and would be completely spent by the 45' mark, lol. With nothing to lose, i immediately went straight to a 1" hole at 4" deep. This gave it about five to six extra feet, with the most backend and continuation i think ive ever seen before especially from such a strong solid cover. (im positive theres some sorta particles in it, despite them not marketing it to be.)

Anyways, ive since drilled up two more motion hole balls, to experiment and see for myself whether or not the only reason it worked so well for me was due to the super strong F90 cover and huge sym core. But to my surprise, it worked just as well, in both a hybrid medium strength cover, and a polished solid cover found on the new Green Envy Vibe.

I know this has nothing to do with Motiv balls or that of the op concerns, but i just found it interesting enough to throw it out there, in hopes that maybe Mr. Spangler can perhaps shed some light on why someone with such high tilt like myself is having such great success with the aforementioned motion hole layouts, which obviously adds extra length to ones ball reaction

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum