Recent Comments

theantifeminist { nor do they enjoy having random comments (sometimes unapproved ones which nobody else saw) made months ago be brought up against them Well if other readers think I'm some kind of little dictator here, I'm entitled to give the reasons why. Also, if you accuse me of 'taking words out of your mouth', I'm entitled to provide the context as... } – Mar 31, 9:32 PM

Jon { Or I just get tired of seeing you refer to me in a derogatory manner in almost every comment now? I will keep coming back here since you all have very similar views to me, however do not expect me to comment much anymore. Nobody appreciates having words taken out of their mouth, nor do they enjoy having random comments... } – Mar 31, 5:45 PM

theantifeminist { If I’m not misreading you, you’ve stated that currently, the law deals with this activity in a very ham-fisted, often disproportionate way that’s completely unnecessary. Yes of course they are, and obviously questioning the basis of feminist sex laws - that sex is inherently dangerous and requires a PHD in 'informed consent' - will clearly lead any rational person to... } – Mar 31, 10:52 AM

Aashley Waagnerr { @AF Yup to all of the above. This site is only marginally concerned with issues relating to paedophilia (pre-pubescent children). You have, though, occasionally said something I agree with about legal penalties for peadophile activity. If I'm not misreading you, you've stated that currently, the law deals with this activity in a very ham-fisted, often disproportionate way that's completely unnecessary.... } – Mar 31, 3:42 AM

Eric { LOL---who would have believed it? Yes, men in the Anglosphere are EXPECTED to be paedocrites. I remember saying that I thought Selena Gomez and Araiana Grande were hotter than most cougarish femihag actresses and some commenter snorted: "Most men would never admit to being attracted to such young-looking girls." "'Would never admit' is the operative phrase" I replied---which of course... } – Mar 31, 1:48 AM

theantifeminist { @Asshley - A few weeks ago I was waiting at a bus stop and two young girls joined the queue, apparently they had come straight from gym class as one of them was wearing a very short plaid gym skirt with blue knee socks. She looked a mix of Phillipina and European, and was, admittedly, rather adorable, to use Jon... } – Mar 30, 12:27 PM

theantifeminist { Thanks Albert, and good to see you back. Another good piece from her on Fraudtrelle - the monster is actually trying to pin the blame for the airplane murder/suicide crash on mras!!! http://judgybitch.com/2015/03/27/david-futrelle-redefines-the-words-sick-motherfucker/ } – Mar 30, 12:07 PM

Aashley Waangerr { Really interesting comment below the article. I don't want to make AF's life harder than it already is, so I won't quote it directly. I also don't pretend to speak for anyone but myself, but frankly, I can see where they're coming from. That's not saying anything about how such an observation might inform one's actions, just making a note... } – Mar 30, 9:48 AM

yesitsmealbert { Her post gives me so much hope. Gentlemen, we will win. I will be at the next ICMI, but this time I won't be alone. } – Mar 30, 3:34 AM

yesitsmealbert { This study was brilliant. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. I too would love to see your follow up idea. We could actually graph the hypocrisy. } – Mar 30, 3:24 AM

theantifeminist { Can't be bothered searching for (and looking at) the link, but the other day there was a story in the UK media of a man jailed for a year after being tricked into meeting what he had believed to be a 14 year old but was, in fact, another paedocrite vigilante group ('Dark Justice'). But what was most disturbing about... } – Mar 29, 11:00 AM

theantifeminist { middle school girls when I was in middle school vs middle school girls now pic.twitter.com/3FVJSgz9PM— what (@chanelpuke) March 26, 2015 Lol. } – Mar 29, 12:02 AM

thedude { "edit : according to wikipedia, filming of The Goblet of Fire began in early 2004, which would have made Emma Watson 13 in at least some of the scenes (her brithdate is 15th April 1990)." Well, that's me told. I'll shut up now then lol. } – Mar 28, 9:53 PM

Anti-Feminist Books

"With young girls Nature seems to have had in view what, in the language of the drama, is called a striking effect; as for a few years she dowers them with a wealth of beauty and is lavish in her gift of charm, at the expense of all the rest of their life; so that during those years they may capture the fantasy of some man to such a degree that he is hurried away into undertaking the honorable care of them, in some form or other, as long as they live—a step for which there would not appear to be any sufficient warranty if reason only directed his thoughts. Accordingly, Nature has equipped woman, as she does all her creatures, with the weapons and implements requisite for the safeguarding of her existence, and for just as long as it is necessary for her to have them. Here, as elsewhere, Nature proceeds with her usual economy; for just as the female ant, after fecundation, loses her wings, which are then superfluous, nay, actually a danger to the business of breeding; so, after giving birth to one or two children, a woman generally loses her beauty; probably, indeed, for similar reasons."

Indian Man Beaten to Death by Nieces Near Delhi – Thousands of Women Riot Demanding Better Protection for Men

A man was beaten to death by his three nieces over a land dispute in Bihar, police said Saturday.
Harihar Choudhary, a resident of Bhatwalia village in Gopalganj district, was beaten to death by his three nieces while he was ploughing the field Friday, police officer Anand Kumar Pandey said.

“Choudhary’s nieces told him not to plough. But when he refused, they attacked him with bamboo sticks and beat him to death,” he said.

Of course, I made up the part in the title suggesting that thousands of women were marching in the streets protesting against a man being brutally murdered. Some hope.

I don’t want anyone to think I am in bad taste for drawing this analogy with the recent appalling and beyond evil gang rape and murder of the young Indian student on a bus, but it needs to be drawn and a couple of points made.

Men are violently beaten, murdered, burnt alive, skinned alive, on a literally daily basis in these Third World shit holes. But of course, no one gives a f***, because they are men, even when it is women doing the killing.

There will be no women marching to demand an end to this.

And notice the media concentrate on the fact that she was raped, not the fact that she was beaten into a coma, and subsequent death, with iron bars. The media would like you to think that it was the rape itself that was responsible for her massive internal injuries causing her death. Very unlikely. Being repeatedly smashed with heavy iron bars by multiple assailants and then thrown out of the moving bus is a far more likely cause.

And, of course, if rape is worse than death, as most feminists claim, then we should be thankful that she did die. In that case, I wonder why the men now face the death penalty for murder, and not for the original rape?

Of course the Sexual Trade Union won’t miss a beat in exploiting this tragic and appalling case to make yet more misandrist anti-sex laws that protect their own sexual asking price. India already far outshines even the eUSSR in this regard – recently, the age of consent was raised to 18, with massively draconian punishments for even the slightest transgression. Despite this, as a knee-jerk reaction to the rape of the student, India now wants to reduce the age of criminal responsibilty in rape cases from 18 to 15. Talk about having your cake and eating it (http://www.indiatvnews.com/crime/news/congress-anti-rape-draft-bill-proposes-years-jail-2276.html).

I guess the question going through my mind right now is: what is the most misandric country on earth? Despite the many laws (and rather draconian punishments meted out) in the US that favor women over men, and a pop culture that does far more mocking and demonization of men than worship of them, for whatever reason (usually the protection of “innocent until proven guilty” in US CRIMINAL law, meaning its kind of harder to be convicted of something like rape) the US is not usually considered the most misandric. Across the manosphere I usually hear three countries mentioned as the “worst”.
A. Canada
B. Sweden / The Scandanavian countries in general
C. India

Canada and the Scandanavian countries: the argument seems to be that they are the most misandric because of the ease with which one can be convicted of certain types of assaults against women, the fact that penalties for such things tend to be higher than in other aspects of their criminal justice systems (thus showing a focus on demonizing crime against females) and the fact that their feminist movements have significant penetration of, and support by those in power. On the other hand, these are “rehabilitation” style societies and punishments are, by US standards , pretty damn light.
India: Whilst one can actually find LAWS and cultural things in India that actually DO disadvantage women, there is a hell of a lot of legislation and culture that demonizes males explicitly. You have “women only” trains, for instance. You have their draconian and easily abused domestic violence laws. You have a mass feminist movement along with tons of asian style “chivalry” that has led to these demonstrations. In the US the feminists and some of the socon’s joined forces at various times, mostly to attack male sexuality. India seems to be on that kind of thing on steroids over the past 5 to ten years.

Lastly, there are a few countries I left out like Great Britain and Australia or New Zealand. Like the US , these countries, for whatever reason, don’t often get the “most misandric” label considered by most in the manosphere and I wonder why not?

Anyway, are there any thoughts here as to what really is the worst country (or series of countries like Scandanavia) for men?

Clarence:
I think that those three countries you’ve mentioned get more attention because feminism is actually on the defensive there. Fidelbogen has been writing that the MRM in India has far more power than the Anglosphere. The Assange and Berge cases have weakened feminism in Scandanavia; and there’s been a lot of MRM activity in Canada recently such as the protests which turned violent in Vancouver and Toronto.

As far as the Anglosphere goes, the misandry is so deeply entrenched it’s arguable as to whether Australia, Britain, or the US is actually worse. Maybe the reason is on these other countries is because they have a possibly of improving? The Anglosphere is more or less a lost cause.

Of course the Sexual Trade Union won’t miss a beat in exploiting this tragic and appalling case to make yet more misandrist anti-sex laws that protect their own sexual asking price.

some journalist whose name I forget once called this “desk drawer legislation”.

When as a politician you have laws in your drawer that you know are too drastic and draconian to be passed under “normal” circumstances. So you wait for your chance, in the shape of a catastrophic current event, to pull them out of your hat and in the headless confusion that surrounds that event you hope that the hysteria will be great enough that nobody will really question the wisdom of your piece of draft legislation.

Just think of all the post-9/11 hysteria and all the encroachments on basic civilian freedoms that followed the attacks. Those who pushed for all the “anti-terrorism” legislation that was enacted around the globe had had all of it in their drawers for years but knew the time had not yet come. It was even admitted in accompanying strategy papers within U.S. government circles that it would take a cataclysmic event to push these measures through, and that they would most likely never find any support whatsoever in the absence of such an event.

And it’s the same with many anti-sex law that have been handed down in the past 10 or 15 years. The more outrageous the crime, the more hysterical and mindless the response. Well, again, only seemingly mindless, because those propagating the responses know full well what they are doing.

And it’s the same with many anti-sex law that have been handed down in the past 10 or 15 years. The more outrageous the crime, the more hysterical and mindless the response. Well, again, only seemingly mindless, because those propagating the responses know full well what they are doing.

With New Labour in the UK, it was chilling the obvious manner in which the government manipulated tragic crimes and killings of little girls in order to announce ‘we’re getting tough on paedophiles’.

As we know, most of these laws stem from the EU and other intergovernmental treaties. Yet we repeatedly had the government announcing a new sex law (that had already been agreed upon) the very day or two after a tragic child murder or such like. In other words, they deliberately waited for an outrageous sex crime before they announced the new law in order to win votes for ‘cracking down’ on paedos – ususally pretending that it was their own initiative decided in the wake of the tragedy, without even mentioning the EU directive that had already mandated it.

According to our good friend Chris Brand, there may have been a religious motive involved as well :

As a 23-year old medical student died from being raped for an hour by six men on a bus in Delhi (Sun, 30 xii), no details were provided to or by MSM as to the attackers’ ethnicity; but the fact that the girl had been sent for treatment in Singapore not for medical reasons but on orders from the highest government circles suggested that Indian authorities had wished to defuse ethnic tension (e.g. between Hindus and Muslims) by suppressing the most basic facts of the case.