"I hope your baby dies” – woman admits threatening pregnant PC

A WOMAN told a pregnant police officer that she hoped her baby would die after becoming frustrated at Bournemouth’s inquiry office.

Zara Hill, 29, of Limesdale Gardens in Edgware, north London, visited the police station in Madeira Road last year to report an incident.

But after being kept waiting, she became “agitated” and began to shout and swear.

PC Lou Roberts was called to speak to the defendant, but Hill told the officer that she hoped she would have “the worst labour” and that her baby died.

She admitted using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour to cause harassment, alarm or distress at Bournemouth Magistrates’ Court on February 7, after entering a not guilty plea during her first court appearance.

She looks like a horrible woman. Even if she did not mean to say what she said. What goes around comes around. She should of been given a harsher fine.

She looks like a horrible woman. Even if she did not mean to say what she said. What goes around comes around. She should of been given a harsher fine.Cat7174

She looks like a horrible woman. Even if she did not mean to say what she said. What goes around comes around. She should of been given a harsher fine.

Score: 23

JemBmth says...7:41am Wed 12 Feb 14

kalebmoledirt wrote…

No doubt we are supporting this vile chav

I don't think so jatemoledirt. We all lose patience sometimes but MOST of use manage to control it. It can be frustrating at times, it's just that some people do not know how to behave eg. the above./ There are some unbearable people around. It us their problem - I suggest 'anger management'!

[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
No doubt we are supporting this vile chav[/p][/quote]I don't think so jatemoledirt. We all lose patience sometimes but MOST of use manage to control it. It can be frustrating at times, it's just that some people do not know how to behave eg. the above./ There are some unbearable people around. It us their problem - I suggest 'anger management'!JemBmth

kalebmoledirt wrote…

No doubt we are supporting this vile chav

I don't think so jatemoledirt. We all lose patience sometimes but MOST of use manage to control it. It can be frustrating at times, it's just that some people do not know how to behave eg. the above./ There are some unbearable people around. It us their problem - I suggest 'anger management'!

Score: -20

exocet says...7:42am Wed 12 Feb 14

just scum.

just scum.exocet

just scum.

Score: 14

we-shall-see says...7:48am Wed 12 Feb 14

What a thoroughly nasty piece of work. Pug ugly in nature and appearance it seems ....

What a thoroughly nasty piece of work. Pug ugly in nature and appearance it seems ....we-shall-see

What a thoroughly nasty piece of work. Pug ugly in nature and appearance it seems ....

Score: 24

kalebmoledirt says...7:56am Wed 12 Feb 14

JemBmth wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

No doubt we are supporting this vile chav

I don't think so jatemoledirt. We all lose patience sometimes but MOST of use manage to control it. It can be frustrating at times, it's just that some people do not know how to behave eg. the above./ There are some unbearable people around. It us their problem - I suggest 'anger management'!

Stick with the coarseJem,,hope it works for you and your day gets better

[quote][p][bold]JemBmth[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
No doubt we are supporting this vile chav[/p][/quote]I don't think so jatemoledirt. We all lose patience sometimes but MOST of use manage to control it. It can be frustrating at times, it's just that some people do not know how to behave eg. the above./ There are some unbearable people around. It us their problem - I suggest 'anger management'![/p][/quote]Stick with the coarseJem,,hope it works for you and your day gets betterkalebmoledirt

JemBmth wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

No doubt we are supporting this vile chav

I don't think so jatemoledirt. We all lose patience sometimes but MOST of use manage to control it. It can be frustrating at times, it's just that some people do not know how to behave eg. the above./ There are some unbearable people around. It us their problem - I suggest 'anger management'!

Stick with the coarseJem,,hope it works for you and your day gets better

Score: -7

canfordcherry says...8:00am Wed 12 Feb 14

I bet her parents are extremely proud of their little girl!

I bet her parents are extremely proud of their little girl!canfordcherry

I bet her parents are extremely proud of their little girl!

Score: 10

kalebmoledirt says...8:04am Wed 12 Feb 14

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped itkalebmoledirt

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Score: -1

Baysider says...8:27am Wed 12 Feb 14

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it[/p][/quote]Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?Baysider

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Score: -13

Controversial But True says...8:45am Wed 12 Feb 14

Typical North London ****!

Typical North London ****!Controversial But True

Typical North London ****!

Score: 2

billy bumble says...8:51am Wed 12 Feb 14

Whilst I think this woman is trash it seems a bit of a storm in a teacup Wonder if it would have got to Court if it hadn't been a cop on the receiving end

Whilst I think this woman is trash it seems a bit of a storm in a teacup
Wonder if it would have got to Court if it hadn't been a cop on the receiving endbilly bumble

Whilst I think this woman is trash it seems a bit of a storm in a teacup Wonder if it would have got to Court if it hadn't been a cop on the receiving end

Score: 16

Arthur Maureen says...9:00am Wed 12 Feb 14

Double tap to the head for this ****.

Double tap to the head for this ****.Arthur Maureen

Double tap to the head for this ****.

Score: -7

losthope says...9:07am Wed 12 Feb 14

Isn't it interesting that saying that to a police officer meant the case got to court, while an 'ordinary' person complaining about similar abuse yelled at them in the street would have told there was nothing they could do and left with the impression they were wasting police time?

Isn't it interesting that saying that to a police officer meant the case got to court, while an 'ordinary' person complaining about similar abuse yelled at them in the street would have told there was nothing they could do and left with the impression they were wasting police time?losthope

Isn't it interesting that saying that to a police officer meant the case got to court, while an 'ordinary' person complaining about similar abuse yelled at them in the street would have told there was nothing they could do and left with the impression they were wasting police time?

Score: -1

rozmister says...9:25am Wed 12 Feb 14

losthope wrote…

Isn't it interesting that saying that to a police officer meant the case got to court, while an 'ordinary' person complaining about similar abuse yelled at them in the street would have told there was nothing they could do and left with the impression they were wasting police time?

Probably because they're going about their job in the same way that bus companies and hospitals don't tolerate abuse and always press for prosecution of people who do abuse their staff.

[quote][p][bold]losthope[/bold] wrote:
Isn't it interesting that saying that to a police officer meant the case got to court, while an 'ordinary' person complaining about similar abuse yelled at them in the street would have told there was nothing they could do and left with the impression they were wasting police time?[/p][/quote]Probably because they're going about their job in the same way that bus companies and hospitals don't tolerate abuse and always press for prosecution of people who do abuse their staff.rozmister

losthope wrote…

Isn't it interesting that saying that to a police officer meant the case got to court, while an 'ordinary' person complaining about similar abuse yelled at them in the street would have told there was nothing they could do and left with the impression they were wasting police time?

Probably because they're going about their job in the same way that bus companies and hospitals don't tolerate abuse and always press for prosecution of people who do abuse their staff.

Score: 27

geoffrey says...9:37am Wed 12 Feb 14

So, a lady customer, wishing to report a serious matter, receives appalling service at a police station and complains. A delicate police officer, never having been trained to expect to come across uncouth language in the course of her duties, does not apologise but charges the lady with a criminal offence!!!!!! If this is how one is treated in Madeira Road, is it any wonder law abiding citizens are reluctant to engage with our Police Force?

So, a lady customer, wishing to report a serious matter, receives appalling service at a police station and complains.
A delicate police officer, never having been trained to expect to come across uncouth language in the course of her duties, does not apologise but charges the lady with a criminal offence!!!!!!
If this is how one is treated in Madeira Road, is it any wonder law abiding citizens are reluctant to engage with our Police Force?geoffrey

So, a lady customer, wishing to report a serious matter, receives appalling service at a police station and complains. A delicate police officer, never having been trained to expect to come across uncouth language in the course of her duties, does not apologise but charges the lady with a criminal offence!!!!!! If this is how one is treated in Madeira Road, is it any wonder law abiding citizens are reluctant to engage with our Police Force?

Score: -53

Old Colonial says...9:42am Wed 12 Feb 14

"Hill admitted she could have been “under the influence” at the time of the incident." Oh well, that's OK then!

"Hill admitted she could have been “under the influence” at the time of the incident."
Oh well, that's OK then!Old Colonial

"Hill admitted she could have been “under the influence” at the time of the incident." Oh well, that's OK then!

Score: 17

rayc says...9:47am Wed 12 Feb 14

geoffrey wrote…

So, a lady customer, wishing to report a serious matter, receives appalling service at a police station and complains. A delicate police officer, never having been trained to expect to come across uncouth language in the course of her duties, does not apologise but charges the lady with a criminal offence!!!!!! If this is how one is treated in Madeira Road, is it any wonder law abiding citizens are reluctant to engage with our Police Force?

I do not consider what was said to be 'uncouth' language. I am pleased that she was prosecuted for what she said and she got off very lightly with only a conditional discharge and £55 costs. Nobody goes to work to be abused and told they deserve a 'worst labour' and hope their baby dies. The 'lady customer' is typical of those who have turned our hospital A&E departments into places that now need security guards and perhaps if she was not 'under the influence' so often she might be able to control her 'pure anger'.

[quote][p][bold]geoffrey[/bold] wrote:
So, a lady customer, wishing to report a serious matter, receives appalling service at a police station and complains.
A delicate police officer, never having been trained to expect to come across uncouth language in the course of her duties, does not apologise but charges the lady with a criminal offence!!!!!!
If this is how one is treated in Madeira Road, is it any wonder law abiding citizens are reluctant to engage with our Police Force?[/p][/quote]I do not consider what was said to be 'uncouth' language. I am pleased that she was prosecuted for what she said and she got off very lightly with only a conditional discharge and £55 costs.
Nobody goes to work to be abused and told they deserve a 'worst labour' and hope their baby dies. The 'lady customer' is typical of those who have turned our hospital A&E departments into places that now need security guards and perhaps if she was not 'under the influence' so often she might be able to control her 'pure anger'.rayc

geoffrey wrote…

So, a lady customer, wishing to report a serious matter, receives appalling service at a police station and complains. A delicate police officer, never having been trained to expect to come across uncouth language in the course of her duties, does not apologise but charges the lady with a criminal offence!!!!!! If this is how one is treated in Madeira Road, is it any wonder law abiding citizens are reluctant to engage with our Police Force?

I do not consider what was said to be 'uncouth' language. I am pleased that she was prosecuted for what she said and she got off very lightly with only a conditional discharge and £55 costs. Nobody goes to work to be abused and told they deserve a 'worst labour' and hope their baby dies. The 'lady customer' is typical of those who have turned our hospital A&E departments into places that now need security guards and perhaps if she was not 'under the influence' so often she might be able to control her 'pure anger'.

Score: 31

nickynoodah says...9:55am Wed 12 Feb 14

No doubt a bedsit dweller and a smoking splifhead one of our poorest citizens you know

No doubt a bedsit dweller and a smoking splifhead
one of our poorest citizens you knownickynoodah

No doubt a bedsit dweller and a smoking splifhead one of our poorest citizens you know

Score: -11

user_name says...10:05am Wed 12 Feb 14

geoffrey wrote…

So, a lady customer, wishing to report a serious matter, receives appalling service at a police station and complains. A delicate police officer, never having been trained to expect to come across uncouth language in the course of her duties, does not apologise but charges the lady with a criminal offence!!!!!! If this is how one is treated in Madeira Road, is it any wonder law abiding citizens are reluctant to engage with our Police Force?

Why should anyone doing their job have to put up with that type of abuse? Trained or not. The attitude of ' if I dont get what I want NOW then I can act how I please and it's not my fault.'

[quote][p][bold]geoffrey[/bold] wrote:
So, a lady customer, wishing to report a serious matter, receives appalling service at a police station and complains. A delicate police officer, never having been trained to expect to come across uncouth language in the course of her duties, does not apologise but charges the lady with a criminal offence!!!!!! If this is how one is treated in Madeira Road, is it any wonder law abiding citizens are reluctant to engage with our Police Force?[/p][/quote]Why should anyone doing their job have to put up with that type of abuse? Trained or not. The attitude of ' if I dont get what I want NOW then I can act how I please and it's not my fault.'user_name

geoffrey wrote…

So, a lady customer, wishing to report a serious matter, receives appalling service at a police station and complains. A delicate police officer, never having been trained to expect to come across uncouth language in the course of her duties, does not apologise but charges the lady with a criminal offence!!!!!! If this is how one is treated in Madeira Road, is it any wonder law abiding citizens are reluctant to engage with our Police Force?

Why should anyone doing their job have to put up with that type of abuse? Trained or not. The attitude of ' if I dont get what I want NOW then I can act how I please and it's not my fault.'

Score: 37

Baysider says...10:14am Wed 12 Feb 14

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it[/p][/quote]Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?[/p][/quote]Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?Baysider

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

Score: -11

The Liberal says...10:20am Wed 12 Feb 14

kalebmoledirt wrote…

No doubt we are supporting this vile chav

Having checked out Limesdale Gardens on Google Street View, it hardly looks like a deprived neighbourhood. Either way, she should have received a much higher fine plus community service for her appalling behaviour. With a temper like that, I hope she doesn't have any children of her own.

[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
No doubt we are supporting this vile chav[/p][/quote]Having checked out Limesdale Gardens on Google Street View, it hardly looks like a deprived neighbourhood. Either way, she should have received a much higher fine plus community service for her appalling behaviour. With a temper like that, I hope she doesn't have any children of her own.The Liberal

kalebmoledirt wrote…

No doubt we are supporting this vile chav

Having checked out Limesdale Gardens on Google Street View, it hardly looks like a deprived neighbourhood. Either way, she should have received a much higher fine plus community service for her appalling behaviour. With a temper like that, I hope she doesn't have any children of her own.

Score: 10

rayc says...10:29am Wed 12 Feb 14

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

You are the only one who has mentioned the skin colour of he partner. I thought it meant that her partner appeared to be pushing a push chair so it made it even worse, that being a Mother herself would wish that another woman would have her baby die.

[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it[/p][/quote]Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?[/p][/quote]Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?[/p][/quote]You are the only one who has mentioned the skin colour of he partner. I thought it meant that her partner appeared to be pushing a push chair so it made it even worse, that being a Mother herself would wish that another woman would have her baby die.rayc

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

You are the only one who has mentioned the skin colour of he partner. I thought it meant that her partner appeared to be pushing a push chair so it made it even worse, that being a Mother herself would wish that another woman would have her baby die.

Score: 25

nickynoodah says...10:34am Wed 12 Feb 14

Is this the same Zara Hill who was friends with Gemma Moss

Is this the same Zara Hill who was friends with Gemma Mossnickynoodah

Is this the same Zara Hill who was friends with Gemma Moss

Score: 0

Baysider says...10:36am Wed 12 Feb 14

rayc wrote…

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

You are the only one who has mentioned the skin colour of he partner. I thought it meant that her partner appeared to be pushing a push chair so it made it even worse, that being a Mother herself would wish that another woman would have her baby die.

...yeah right. That would have made it a far more "interesting" story as kalebmoledirt said wouldn't it?

[quote][p][bold]rayc[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it[/p][/quote]Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?[/p][/quote]Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?[/p][/quote]You are the only one who has mentioned the skin colour of he partner. I thought it meant that her partner appeared to be pushing a push chair so it made it even worse, that being a Mother herself would wish that another woman would have her baby die.[/p][/quote]...yeah right. That would have made it a far more "interesting" story as kalebmoledirt said wouldn't it?Baysider

rayc wrote…

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

You are the only one who has mentioned the skin colour of he partner. I thought it meant that her partner appeared to be pushing a push chair so it made it even worse, that being a Mother herself would wish that another woman would have her baby die.

...yeah right. That would have made it a far more "interesting" story as kalebmoledirt said wouldn't it?

Score: -15

Obi wan kenobi Nil says...11:20am Wed 12 Feb 14

geoffrey wrote…

So, a lady customer, wishing to report a serious matter, receives appalling service at a police station and complains. A delicate police officer, never having been trained to expect to come across uncouth language in the course of her duties, does not apologise but charges the lady with a criminal offence!!!!!! If this is how one is treated in Madeira Road, is it any wonder law abiding citizens are reluctant to engage with our Police Force?

What a shameful thing to say !This horrible woman,who displayed the most un sensitive and offensive behaviour in front of members of the public has been dealt with correctly.I consider her scum and to be honest you're not much better !

[quote][p][bold]geoffrey[/bold] wrote:
So, a lady customer, wishing to report a serious matter, receives appalling service at a police station and complains. A delicate police officer, never having been trained to expect to come across uncouth language in the course of her duties, does not apologise but charges the lady with a criminal offence!!!!!! If this is how one is treated in Madeira Road, is it any wonder law abiding citizens are reluctant to engage with our Police Force?[/p][/quote]What a shameful thing to say !This horrible woman,who displayed the most un sensitive and offensive behaviour in front of members of the public has been dealt with correctly.I consider her scum and to be honest you're not much better !Obi wan kenobi Nil

geoffrey wrote…

So, a lady customer, wishing to report a serious matter, receives appalling service at a police station and complains. A delicate police officer, never having been trained to expect to come across uncouth language in the course of her duties, does not apologise but charges the lady with a criminal offence!!!!!! If this is how one is treated in Madeira Road, is it any wonder law abiding citizens are reluctant to engage with our Police Force?

What a shameful thing to say !This horrible woman,who displayed the most un sensitive and offensive behaviour in front of members of the public has been dealt with correctly.I consider her scum and to be honest you're not much better !

Score: 22

suzigirl says...11:26am Wed 12 Feb 14

Arthur Maureen wrote…

Double tap to the head for this ****.

You do make some stupid comments!

[quote][p][bold]Arthur Maureen[/bold] wrote:
Double tap to the head for this ****.[/p][/quote]You do make some stupid comments!suzigirl

Arthur Maureen wrote…

Double tap to the head for this ****.

You do make some stupid comments!

Score: 5

kalebmoledirt says...12:00pm Wed 12 Feb 14

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

From the horses mouth to the donkeys rear end you would do well not to bring race creed or colour to the debate my point was, is the pram carrying her child and if so can she be trusted with it

[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it[/p][/quote]Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?[/p][/quote]Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?[/p][/quote]From the horses mouth to the donkeys rear end you would do well not to bring race creed or colour to the debate my point was, is the pram carrying her child and if so can she be trusted with itkalebmoledirt

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

From the horses mouth to the donkeys rear end you would do well not to bring race creed or colour to the debate my point was, is the pram carrying her child and if so can she be trusted with it

Score: 7

kalebmoledirt says...12:08pm Wed 12 Feb 14

The Liberal wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

No doubt we are supporting this vile chav

Having checked out Limesdale Gardens on Google Street View, it hardly looks like a deprived neighbourhood. Either way, she should have received a much higher fine plus community service for her appalling behaviour. With a temper like that, I hope she doesn't have any children of her own.

People on full benefits (which given her behaviour she is unlikely to be in work)can afford to live in the more upmarket areas.And still afford to be under the the influence of whatever

[quote][p][bold]The Liberal[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
No doubt we are supporting this vile chav[/p][/quote]Having checked out Limesdale Gardens on Google Street View, it hardly looks like a deprived neighbourhood. Either way, she should have received a much higher fine plus community service for her appalling behaviour. With a temper like that, I hope she doesn't have any children of her own.[/p][/quote]People on full benefits (which given her behaviour she is unlikely to be in work)can afford to live in the more upmarket areas.And still afford to be under the the influence of whateverkalebmoledirt

The Liberal wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

No doubt we are supporting this vile chav

Having checked out Limesdale Gardens on Google Street View, it hardly looks like a deprived neighbourhood. Either way, she should have received a much higher fine plus community service for her appalling behaviour. With a temper like that, I hope she doesn't have any children of her own.

People on full benefits (which given her behaviour she is unlikely to be in work)can afford to live in the more upmarket areas.And still afford to be under the the influence of whatever

Score: 3

kalebmoledirt says...12:08pm Wed 12 Feb 14

The Liberal wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

No doubt we are supporting this vile chav

Having checked out Limesdale Gardens on Google Street View, it hardly looks like a deprived neighbourhood. Either way, she should have received a much higher fine plus community service for her appalling behaviour. With a temper like that, I hope she doesn't have any children of her own.

People on full benefits (which given her behaviour she is unlikely to be in work)can afford to live in the more upmarket areas.And still afford to be under the the influence of whatever

[quote][p][bold]The Liberal[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
No doubt we are supporting this vile chav[/p][/quote]Having checked out Limesdale Gardens on Google Street View, it hardly looks like a deprived neighbourhood. Either way, she should have received a much higher fine plus community service for her appalling behaviour. With a temper like that, I hope she doesn't have any children of her own.[/p][/quote]People on full benefits (which given her behaviour she is unlikely to be in work)can afford to live in the more upmarket areas.And still afford to be under the the influence of whateverkalebmoledirt

The Liberal wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

No doubt we are supporting this vile chav

Having checked out Limesdale Gardens on Google Street View, it hardly looks like a deprived neighbourhood. Either way, she should have received a much higher fine plus community service for her appalling behaviour. With a temper like that, I hope she doesn't have any children of her own.

People on full benefits (which given her behaviour she is unlikely to be in work)can afford to live in the more upmarket areas.And still afford to be under the the influence of whatever

Score: -2

losthope says...12:13pm Wed 12 Feb 14

rozmister wrote…

losthope wrote…

Isn't it interesting that saying that to a police officer meant the case got to court, while an 'ordinary' person complaining about similar abuse yelled at them in the street would have told there was nothing they could do and left with the impression they were wasting police time?

Probably because they're going about their job in the same way that bus companies and hospitals don't tolerate abuse and always press for prosecution of people who do abuse their staff.

Yes, I can see that so effectively we have a two tier justice system. One for people with back-up from employers, which means they aren't on their own and feeling scared as they're abused because they don't know what it'll escalate into and one when they can call in reinforcements and quite possibly security staff. Wouldn't it be nice if we didn't tolerate abuse of anyone?

[quote][p][bold]rozmister[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]losthope[/bold] wrote:
Isn't it interesting that saying that to a police officer meant the case got to court, while an 'ordinary' person complaining about similar abuse yelled at them in the street would have told there was nothing they could do and left with the impression they were wasting police time?[/p][/quote]Probably because they're going about their job in the same way that bus companies and hospitals don't tolerate abuse and always press for prosecution of people who do abuse their staff.[/p][/quote]Yes, I can see that so effectively we have a two tier justice system. One for people with back-up from employers, which means they aren't on their own and feeling scared as they're abused because they don't know what it'll escalate into and one when they can call in reinforcements and quite possibly security staff.
Wouldn't it be nice if we didn't tolerate abuse of anyone?losthope

rozmister wrote…

losthope wrote…

Isn't it interesting that saying that to a police officer meant the case got to court, while an 'ordinary' person complaining about similar abuse yelled at them in the street would have told there was nothing they could do and left with the impression they were wasting police time?

Probably because they're going about their job in the same way that bus companies and hospitals don't tolerate abuse and always press for prosecution of people who do abuse their staff.

Yes, I can see that so effectively we have a two tier justice system. One for people with back-up from employers, which means they aren't on their own and feeling scared as they're abused because they don't know what it'll escalate into and one when they can call in reinforcements and quite possibly security staff. Wouldn't it be nice if we didn't tolerate abuse of anyone?

Score: 4

Baysider says...12:47pm Wed 12 Feb 14

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

From the horses mouth to the donkeys rear end you would do well not to bring race creed or colour to the debate my point was, is the pram carrying her child and if so can she be trusted with it

Why not say that then? Oh that's right because it's total rubbish and it's taken you all morning to think of something that even remotely gets you out of the corner you painted yourself in to. It doesn't even stack up because you can see there's a buggy with her so whether the photo was uncropped or not it's a reasonable assumption she had a child with her. You know it, I know it and everyone reading your comment knows what you were alluding to with your reference to the photo being cropped.

[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it[/p][/quote]Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?[/p][/quote]Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?[/p][/quote]From the horses mouth to the donkeys rear end you would do well not to bring race creed or colour to the debate my point was, is the pram carrying her child and if so can she be trusted with it[/p][/quote]Why not say that then? Oh that's right because it's total rubbish and it's taken you all morning to think of something that even remotely gets you out of the corner you painted yourself in to. It doesn't even stack up because you can see there's a buggy with her so whether the photo was uncropped or not it's a reasonable assumption she had a child with her.
You know it, I know it and everyone reading your comment knows what you were alluding to with your reference to the photo being cropped.Baysider

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

From the horses mouth to the donkeys rear end you would do well not to bring race creed or colour to the debate my point was, is the pram carrying her child and if so can she be trusted with it

Why not say that then? Oh that's right because it's total rubbish and it's taken you all morning to think of something that even remotely gets you out of the corner you painted yourself in to. It doesn't even stack up because you can see there's a buggy with her so whether the photo was uncropped or not it's a reasonable assumption she had a child with her. You know it, I know it and everyone reading your comment knows what you were alluding to with your reference to the photo being cropped.

Score: -21

nickynoodah says...1:06pm Wed 12 Feb 14

knondirt couldn't find his way back to his bed sit when he smoked let alone the cop shop . you know.

knondirt couldn't find his way back to his bed sit when he smoked
let alone the cop shop .
you know.nickynoodah

knondirt couldn't find his way back to his bed sit when he smoked let alone the cop shop . you know.

Score: -10

steelpaul says...1:06pm Wed 12 Feb 14

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

From the horses mouth to the donkeys rear end you would do well not to bring race creed or colour to the debate my point was, is the pram carrying her child and if so can she be trusted with it

Why not say that then? Oh that's right because it's total rubbish and it's taken you all morning to think of something that even remotely gets you out of the corner you painted yourself in to. It doesn't even stack up because you can see there's a buggy with her so whether the photo was uncropped or not it's a reasonable assumption she had a child with her. You know it, I know it and everyone reading your comment knows what you were alluding to with your reference to the photo being cropped.

Although racism is still occasionally a problem in this country, people like you who try and turn everything into a racial argument are a far bigger problem in this day and age. Shut up, just going by the thumbs downs on each of your posts, it's quite clear that everyone thinks your being a moron

[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it[/p][/quote]Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?[/p][/quote]Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?[/p][/quote]From the horses mouth to the donkeys rear end you would do well not to bring race creed or colour to the debate my point was, is the pram carrying her child and if so can she be trusted with it[/p][/quote]Why not say that then? Oh that's right because it's total rubbish and it's taken you all morning to think of something that even remotely gets you out of the corner you painted yourself in to. It doesn't even stack up because you can see there's a buggy with her so whether the photo was uncropped or not it's a reasonable assumption she had a child with her.
You know it, I know it and everyone reading your comment knows what you were alluding to with your reference to the photo being cropped.[/p][/quote]Although racism is still occasionally a problem in this country, people like you who try and turn everything into a racial argument are a far bigger problem in this day and age. Shut up, just going by the thumbs downs on each of your posts, it's quite clear that everyone thinks your being a moronsteelpaul

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

From the horses mouth to the donkeys rear end you would do well not to bring race creed or colour to the debate my point was, is the pram carrying her child and if so can she be trusted with it

Why not say that then? Oh that's right because it's total rubbish and it's taken you all morning to think of something that even remotely gets you out of the corner you painted yourself in to. It doesn't even stack up because you can see there's a buggy with her so whether the photo was uncropped or not it's a reasonable assumption she had a child with her. You know it, I know it and everyone reading your comment knows what you were alluding to with your reference to the photo being cropped.

Although racism is still occasionally a problem in this country, people like you who try and turn everything into a racial argument are a far bigger problem in this day and age. Shut up, just going by the thumbs downs on each of your posts, it's quite clear that everyone thinks your being a moron

Score: 22

kalebmoledirt says...1:30pm Wed 12 Feb 14

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

From the horses mouth to the donkeys rear end you would do well not to bring race creed or colour to the debate my point was, is the pram carrying her child and if so can she be trusted with it

Why not say that then? Oh that's right because it's total rubbish and it's taken you all morning to think of something that even remotely gets you out of the corner you painted yourself in to. It doesn't even stack up because you can see there's a buggy with her so whether the photo was uncropped or not it's a reasonable assumption she had a child with her. You know it, I know it and everyone reading your comment knows what you were alluding to with your reference to the photo being cropped.

Just got back from walking the dogs mucking out the horses ,fixed a fence,cut some logs had lunch .then found out you were desperate for an argument,but got a life so on this occasion I will allow to get back to your online bingo and practicing your joined up writing

[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it[/p][/quote]Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?[/p][/quote]Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?[/p][/quote]From the horses mouth to the donkeys rear end you would do well not to bring race creed or colour to the debate my point was, is the pram carrying her child and if so can she be trusted with it[/p][/quote]Why not say that then? Oh that's right because it's total rubbish and it's taken you all morning to think of something that even remotely gets you out of the corner you painted yourself in to. It doesn't even stack up because you can see there's a buggy with her so whether the photo was uncropped or not it's a reasonable assumption she had a child with her.
You know it, I know it and everyone reading your comment knows what you were alluding to with your reference to the photo being cropped.[/p][/quote]Just got back from walking the dogs mucking out the horses ,fixed a fence,cut some logs had lunch .then found out you were desperate for an argument,but got a life so on this occasion I will allow to get back to your online bingo and practicing your joined up writingkalebmoledirt

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

From the horses mouth to the donkeys rear end you would do well not to bring race creed or colour to the debate my point was, is the pram carrying her child and if so can she be trusted with it

Why not say that then? Oh that's right because it's total rubbish and it's taken you all morning to think of something that even remotely gets you out of the corner you painted yourself in to. It doesn't even stack up because you can see there's a buggy with her so whether the photo was uncropped or not it's a reasonable assumption she had a child with her. You know it, I know it and everyone reading your comment knows what you were alluding to with your reference to the photo being cropped.

Just got back from walking the dogs mucking out the horses ,fixed a fence,cut some logs had lunch .then found out you were desperate for an argument,but got a life so on this occasion I will allow to get back to your online bingo and practicing your joined up writing

Score: 13

rozmister says...1:54pm Wed 12 Feb 14

losthope wrote…

rozmister wrote…

losthope wrote…

Isn't it interesting that saying that to a police officer meant the case got to court, while an 'ordinary' person complaining about similar abuse yelled at them in the street would have told there was nothing they could do and left with the impression they were wasting police time?

Probably because they're going about their job in the same way that bus companies and hospitals don't tolerate abuse and always press for prosecution of people who do abuse their staff.

Yes, I can see that so effectively we have a two tier justice system. One for people with back-up from employers, which means they aren't on their own and feeling scared as they're abused because they don't know what it'll escalate into and one when they can call in reinforcements and quite possibly security staff. Wouldn't it be nice if we didn't tolerate abuse of anyone?

Absolutely in an ideal world we wouldn't tolerate abuse from anyone. Prosecuting anyone who is abusive is a step in the right direction though so I don't understand the complaint. As well when the police are called out to an incident on the street they can't be sure the complainant is the victim, they can be pretty sure when it's unfolded before their own eyes in their office on CCTV.

[quote][p][bold]losthope[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]rozmister[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]losthope[/bold] wrote: Isn't it interesting that saying that to a police officer meant the case got to court, while an 'ordinary' person complaining about similar abuse yelled at them in the street would have told there was nothing they could do and left with the impression they were wasting police time?[/p][/quote]Probably because they're going about their job in the same way that bus companies and hospitals don't tolerate abuse and always press for prosecution of people who do abuse their staff.[/p][/quote]Yes, I can see that so effectively we have a two tier justice system. One for people with back-up from employers, which means they aren't on their own and feeling scared as they're abused because they don't know what it'll escalate into and one when they can call in reinforcements and quite possibly security staff. Wouldn't it be nice if we didn't tolerate abuse of anyone?[/p][/quote]Absolutely in an ideal world we wouldn't tolerate abuse from anyone. Prosecuting anyone who is abusive is a step in the right direction though so I don't understand the complaint. As well when the police are called out to an incident on the street they can't be sure the complainant is the victim, they can be pretty sure when it's unfolded before their own eyes in their office on CCTV.rozmister

losthope wrote…

rozmister wrote…

losthope wrote…

Isn't it interesting that saying that to a police officer meant the case got to court, while an 'ordinary' person complaining about similar abuse yelled at them in the street would have told there was nothing they could do and left with the impression they were wasting police time?

Probably because they're going about their job in the same way that bus companies and hospitals don't tolerate abuse and always press for prosecution of people who do abuse their staff.

Yes, I can see that so effectively we have a two tier justice system. One for people with back-up from employers, which means they aren't on their own and feeling scared as they're abused because they don't know what it'll escalate into and one when they can call in reinforcements and quite possibly security staff. Wouldn't it be nice if we didn't tolerate abuse of anyone?

Absolutely in an ideal world we wouldn't tolerate abuse from anyone. Prosecuting anyone who is abusive is a step in the right direction though so I don't understand the complaint. As well when the police are called out to an incident on the street they can't be sure the complainant is the victim, they can be pretty sure when it's unfolded before their own eyes in their office on CCTV.

Score: 7

Baysider says...2:31pm Wed 12 Feb 14

steelpaul wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

From the horses mouth to the donkeys rear end you would do well not to bring race creed or colour to the debate my point was, is the pram carrying her child and if so can she be trusted with it

Why not say that then? Oh that's right because it's total rubbish and it's taken you all morning to think of something that even remotely gets you out of the corner you painted yourself in to. It doesn't even stack up because you can see there's a buggy with her so whether the photo was uncropped or not it's a reasonable assumption she had a child with her. You know it, I know it and everyone reading your comment knows what you were alluding to with your reference to the photo being cropped.

Although racism is still occasionally a problem in this country, people like you who try and turn everything into a racial argument are a far bigger problem in this day and age. Shut up, just going by the thumbs downs on each of your posts, it's quite clear that everyone thinks your being a moron

The day I pay attention to the thumbs down on here and use them as my moral compass is quite a way off yet. Have you got any evidence that I try to turn everything into an argument about race? No you haven't because it's not true but on this occasion the poster made a casual remark designed to bring the race of this persons partner into the discussion. No relevance to the issue whatsoever so I challenged them. That doesn't make me some sort of politically correct, tree hugging, liberal or moronic as you so kindly put it but if the alternative is to idly accept casual racism then fair enough. She's still a thoroughly nasty piece of work though...

[quote][p][bold]steelpaul[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it[/p][/quote]Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?[/p][/quote]Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?[/p][/quote]From the horses mouth to the donkeys rear end you would do well not to bring race creed or colour to the debate my point was, is the pram carrying her child and if so can she be trusted with it[/p][/quote]Why not say that then? Oh that's right because it's total rubbish and it's taken you all morning to think of something that even remotely gets you out of the corner you painted yourself in to. It doesn't even stack up because you can see there's a buggy with her so whether the photo was uncropped or not it's a reasonable assumption she had a child with her.
You know it, I know it and everyone reading your comment knows what you were alluding to with your reference to the photo being cropped.[/p][/quote]Although racism is still occasionally a problem in this country, people like you who try and turn everything into a racial argument are a far bigger problem in this day and age. Shut up, just going by the thumbs downs on each of your posts, it's quite clear that everyone thinks your being a moron[/p][/quote]The day I pay attention to the thumbs down on here and use them as my moral compass is quite a way off yet.
Have you got any evidence that I try to turn everything into an argument about race? No you haven't because it's not true but on this occasion the poster made a casual remark designed to bring the race of this persons partner into the discussion. No relevance to the issue whatsoever so I challenged them. That doesn't make me some sort of politically correct, tree hugging, liberal or moronic as you so kindly put it but if the alternative is to idly accept casual racism then fair enough.
She's still a thoroughly nasty piece of work though...Baysider

steelpaul wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

From the horses mouth to the donkeys rear end you would do well not to bring race creed or colour to the debate my point was, is the pram carrying her child and if so can she be trusted with it

Why not say that then? Oh that's right because it's total rubbish and it's taken you all morning to think of something that even remotely gets you out of the corner you painted yourself in to. It doesn't even stack up because you can see there's a buggy with her so whether the photo was uncropped or not it's a reasonable assumption she had a child with her. You know it, I know it and everyone reading your comment knows what you were alluding to with your reference to the photo being cropped.

Although racism is still occasionally a problem in this country, people like you who try and turn everything into a racial argument are a far bigger problem in this day and age. Shut up, just going by the thumbs downs on each of your posts, it's quite clear that everyone thinks your being a moron

The day I pay attention to the thumbs down on here and use them as my moral compass is quite a way off yet. Have you got any evidence that I try to turn everything into an argument about race? No you haven't because it's not true but on this occasion the poster made a casual remark designed to bring the race of this persons partner into the discussion. No relevance to the issue whatsoever so I challenged them. That doesn't make me some sort of politically correct, tree hugging, liberal or moronic as you so kindly put it but if the alternative is to idly accept casual racism then fair enough. She's still a thoroughly nasty piece of work though...

Score: -21

keith milton says...3:28pm Wed 12 Feb 14

well the police only serve the interests of the elites and there masonic masters, we the slaves are scum in the eyes of the police, sounds like this woman has finally woken up and let out her frustration.

well the police only serve the interests of the elites and there masonic masters,
we the slaves are scum in the eyes of the police,
sounds like this woman has finally woken up and let out her frustration.keith milton

well the police only serve the interests of the elites and there masonic masters, we the slaves are scum in the eyes of the police, sounds like this woman has finally woken up and let out her frustration.

Score: -17

Obi wan kenobi Nil says...3:43pm Wed 12 Feb 14

keith milton wrote…

well the police only serve the interests of the elites and there masonic masters, we the slaves are scum in the eyes of the police, sounds like this woman has finally woken up and let out her frustration.

You're a w*nker too !

[quote][p][bold]keith milton[/bold] wrote:
well the police only serve the interests of the elites and there masonic masters,
we the slaves are scum in the eyes of the police,
sounds like this woman has finally woken up and let out her frustration.[/p][/quote]You're a w*nker too !Obi wan kenobi Nil

keith milton wrote…

well the police only serve the interests of the elites and there masonic masters, we the slaves are scum in the eyes of the police, sounds like this woman has finally woken up and let out her frustration.

You're a w*nker too !

Score: 8

kalebmoledirt says...4:26pm Wed 12 Feb 14

keith milton wrote…

well the police only serve the interests of the elites and there masonic masters, we the slaves are scum in the eyes of the police, sounds like this woman has finally woken up and let out her frustration.

Never mind mate .your just a downtrodden tosser.And in years to come your develop into an old downtrodden tossed

[quote][p][bold]keith milton[/bold] wrote:
well the police only serve the interests of the elites and there masonic masters,
we the slaves are scum in the eyes of the police,
sounds like this woman has finally woken up and let out her frustration.[/p][/quote]Never mind mate .your just a downtrodden tosser.And in years to come your develop into an old downtrodden tossedkalebmoledirt

keith milton wrote…

well the police only serve the interests of the elites and there masonic masters, we the slaves are scum in the eyes of the police, sounds like this woman has finally woken up and let out her frustration.

Never mind mate .your just a downtrodden tosser.And in years to come your develop into an old downtrodden tossed

Score: 3

suzigirl says...4:37pm Wed 12 Feb 14

kalebmoledirt wrote…

keith milton wrote…

well the police only serve the interests of the elites and there masonic masters, we the slaves are scum in the eyes of the police, sounds like this woman has finally woken up and let out her frustration.

Never mind mate .your just a downtrodden tosser.And in years to come your develop into an old downtrodden tossed

Nice..........

[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]keith milton[/bold] wrote: well the police only serve the interests of the elites and there masonic masters, we the slaves are scum in the eyes of the police, sounds like this woman has finally woken up and let out her frustration.[/p][/quote]Never mind mate .your just a downtrodden tosser.And in years to come your develop into an old downtrodden tossed[/p][/quote]Nice..........suzigirl

kalebmoledirt wrote…

keith milton wrote…

well the police only serve the interests of the elites and there masonic masters, we the slaves are scum in the eyes of the police, sounds like this woman has finally woken up and let out her frustration.

Never mind mate .your just a downtrodden tosser.And in years to come your develop into an old downtrodden tossed

Nice..........

Score: 0

user_name says...4:37pm Wed 12 Feb 14

keith milton wrote…

well the police only serve the interests of the elites and there masonic masters, we the slaves are scum in the eyes of the police, sounds like this woman has finally woken up and let out her frustration.

Is that the excuse of the day is it? She was just letting out her frustrations. That must make it ok then. It's a good thing that most of us don't shout abuse at people doing their jobs when things go wrong.

[quote][p][bold]keith milton[/bold] wrote:
well the police only serve the interests of the elites and there masonic masters,
we the slaves are scum in the eyes of the police,
sounds like this woman has finally woken up and let out her frustration.[/p][/quote]Is that the excuse of the day is it? She was just letting out her frustrations. That must make it ok then. It's a good thing that most of us don't shout abuse at people doing their jobs when things go wrong.user_name

keith milton wrote…

well the police only serve the interests of the elites and there masonic masters, we the slaves are scum in the eyes of the police, sounds like this woman has finally woken up and let out her frustration.

Is that the excuse of the day is it? She was just letting out her frustrations. That must make it ok then. It's a good thing that most of us don't shout abuse at people doing their jobs when things go wrong.

Score: 14

suzigirl says...4:41pm Wed 12 Feb 14

I think that the Police woman involved should have been used to this sort of abuse and let it go over her head - unfortunately that is the nature of the beast - you see worse on the fly on the wall programmes about Police on the TV!

I think that the Police woman involved should have been used to this sort of abuse and let it go over her head - unfortunately that is the nature of the beast - you see worse on the fly on the wall programmes about Police on the TV!suzigirl

I think that the Police woman involved should have been used to this sort of abuse and let it go over her head - unfortunately that is the nature of the beast - you see worse on the fly on the wall programmes about Police on the TV!

Score: -17

dvdr says...4:55pm Wed 12 Feb 14

Not a nice lady (if indeed "lady" is the correct term here). Perhaps she went to charm school, but clearly did not finish the course. Publishing her photograph gives us all chance to avoid her.

Not a nice lady (if indeed "lady" is the correct term here). Perhaps she went to charm school, but clearly did not finish the course. Publishing her photograph gives us all chance to avoid her.dvdr

Not a nice lady (if indeed "lady" is the correct term here). Perhaps she went to charm school, but clearly did not finish the course. Publishing her photograph gives us all chance to avoid her.

Score: 4

Arthur Maureen says...4:56pm Wed 12 Feb 14

nickynoodah wrote…

No doubt a bedsit dweller and a smoking splifhead one of our poorest citizens you know

Was it you?

[quote][p][bold]nickynoodah[/bold] wrote:
No doubt a bedsit dweller and a smoking splifhead
one of our poorest citizens you know[/p][/quote]Was it you?Arthur Maureen

nickynoodah wrote…

No doubt a bedsit dweller and a smoking splifhead one of our poorest citizens you know

Was it you?

Score: 0

Boscomite says...5:09pm Wed 12 Feb 14

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

The way I read it, was that her partner appears to be pushing a baby buggy.

[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it[/p][/quote]Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?[/p][/quote]Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?[/p][/quote]The way I read it, was that her partner appears to be pushing a baby buggy.Boscomite

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

The way I read it, was that her partner appears to be pushing a baby buggy.

Score: 4

nickynoodah says...7:22pm Wed 12 Feb 14

Arthur Maureen wrote…

nickynoodah wrote…

No doubt a bedsit dweller and a smoking splifhead one of our poorest citizens you know

Was it you?

Nah Is this your real name George also are you new to this site must be

[quote][p][bold]Arthur Maureen[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]nickynoodah[/bold] wrote:
No doubt a bedsit dweller and a smoking splifhead
one of our poorest citizens you know[/p][/quote]Was it you?[/p][/quote]Nah
Is this your real name George
also are you new to this site
must benickynoodah

Arthur Maureen wrote…

nickynoodah wrote…

No doubt a bedsit dweller and a smoking splifhead one of our poorest citizens you know

Was it you?

Nah Is this your real name George also are you new to this site must be

Score: -2

Baysider says...7:24pm Wed 12 Feb 14

Boscomite wrote…

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

The way I read it, was that her partner appears to be pushing a baby buggy.

Yeah...and that would have made it a more "interesting picture" because? We all know what's gone on here but if Echo readers are happier having a go at someone for challenging low level, casual racism rather than the original poster who tried to bring the partners skin colour into the equation then that says more about them than me tbh. Anyway I've made my point several times over but posters should expect to be challenged even if the sites clearly not moderated.

[quote][p][bold]Boscomite[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it[/p][/quote]Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?[/p][/quote]Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?[/p][/quote]The way I read it, was that her partner appears to be pushing a baby buggy.[/p][/quote]Yeah...and that would have made it a more "interesting picture" because?
We all know what's gone on here but if Echo readers are happier having a go at someone for challenging low level, casual racism rather than the original poster who tried to bring the partners skin colour into the equation then that says more about them than me tbh.
Anyway I've made my point several times over but posters should expect to be challenged even if the sites clearly not moderated.Baysider

Boscomite wrote…

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

The way I read it, was that her partner appears to be pushing a baby buggy.

Yeah...and that would have made it a more "interesting picture" because? We all know what's gone on here but if Echo readers are happier having a go at someone for challenging low level, casual racism rather than the original poster who tried to bring the partners skin colour into the equation then that says more about them than me tbh. Anyway I've made my point several times over but posters should expect to be challenged even if the sites clearly not moderated.

Score: -1

kalebmoledirt says...7:28pm Wed 12 Feb 14

suzigirl wrote…

I think that the Police woman involved should have been used to this sort of abuse and let it go over her head - unfortunately that is the nature of the beast - you see worse on the fly on the wall programmes about Police on the TV!

God forbid it becomes acceptable to walk into a public place under the lnfluence and just spout off a foul mouthed outburst.without being prepared to accept being jabbed with cattle prod between the eyes And given a pamphlet on acceptable behaviour.

[quote][p][bold]suzigirl[/bold] wrote:
I think that the Police woman involved should have been used to this sort of abuse and let it go over her head - unfortunately that is the nature of the beast - you see worse on the fly on the wall programmes about Police on the TV![/p][/quote]God forbid it becomes acceptable to walk into a public place under the lnfluence and just spout off a foul mouthed outburst.without being prepared to accept being jabbed with cattle prod between the eyes And given a pamphlet on acceptable behaviour.kalebmoledirt

suzigirl wrote…

I think that the Police woman involved should have been used to this sort of abuse and let it go over her head - unfortunately that is the nature of the beast - you see worse on the fly on the wall programmes about Police on the TV!

God forbid it becomes acceptable to walk into a public place under the lnfluence and just spout off a foul mouthed outburst.without being prepared to accept being jabbed with cattle prod between the eyes And given a pamphlet on acceptable behaviour.

Score: 7

kalebmoledirt says...8:32pm Wed 12 Feb 14

Baysider wrote…

Boscomite wrote…

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

The way I read it, was that her partner appears to be pushing a baby buggy.

Yeah...and that would have made it a more "interesting picture" because? We all know what's gone on here but if Echo readers are happier having a go at someone for challenging low level, casual racism rather than the original poster who tried to bring the partners skin colour into the equation then that says more about them than me tbh. Anyway I've made my point several times over but posters should expect to be challenged even if the sites clearly not moderated.

[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Boscomite[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it[/p][/quote]Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?[/p][/quote]Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?[/p][/quote]The way I read it, was that her partner appears to be pushing a baby buggy.[/p][/quote]Yeah...and that would have made it a more "interesting picture" because?
We all know what's gone on here but if Echo readers are happier having a go at someone for challenging low level, casual racism rather than the original poster who tried to bring the partners skin colour into the equation then that says more about them than me tbh.
Anyway I've made my point several times over but posters should expect to be challenged even if the sites clearly not moderated.[/p][/quote]Relax, your racially sencative.but very judgmental.And have a tendency to spout a lot of sphuedo intellectual noncence. Hope your week gets betterkalebmoledirt

Baysider wrote…

Boscomite wrote…

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

The way I read it, was that her partner appears to be pushing a baby buggy.

Yeah...and that would have made it a more "interesting picture" because? We all know what's gone on here but if Echo readers are happier having a go at someone for challenging low level, casual racism rather than the original poster who tried to bring the partners skin colour into the equation then that says more about them than me tbh. Anyway I've made my point several times over but posters should expect to be challenged even if the sites clearly not moderated.

I think that the Police woman involved should have been used to this sort of abuse and let it go over her head - unfortunately that is the nature of the beast - you see worse on the fly on the wall programmes about Police on the TV!

Never thought I would agree with you. I'll put it down to having flu.

[quote][p][bold]suzigirl[/bold] wrote:
I think that the Police woman involved should have been used to this sort of abuse and let it go over her head - unfortunately that is the nature of the beast - you see worse on the fly on the wall programmes about Police on the TV![/p][/quote]Never thought I would agree with you. I'll put it down to having flu.simcal

suzigirl wrote…

I think that the Police woman involved should have been used to this sort of abuse and let it go over her head - unfortunately that is the nature of the beast - you see worse on the fly on the wall programmes about Police on the TV!

Never thought I would agree with you. I'll put it down to having flu.

Score: -4

JemBmth says...9:08pm Wed 12 Feb 14

JemBmth wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

No doubt we are supporting this vile chav

I don't think so jatemoledirt. We all lose patience sometimes but MOST of use manage to control it. It can be frustrating at times, it's just that some people do not know how to behave eg. the above./ There are some unbearable people around. It us their problem - I suggest 'anger management'!

If anyone is intelligent enough to read between the lines, I was supporting the first two comments. Please read more carefully.

[quote][p][bold]JemBmth[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
No doubt we are supporting this vile chav[/p][/quote]I don't think so jatemoledirt. We all lose patience sometimes but MOST of use manage to control it. It can be frustrating at times, it's just that some people do not know how to behave eg. the above./ There are some unbearable people around. It us their problem - I suggest 'anger management'![/p][/quote]If anyone is intelligent enough to read between the lines, I was supporting the first two comments. Please read more carefully.JemBmth

JemBmth wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

No doubt we are supporting this vile chav

I don't think so jatemoledirt. We all lose patience sometimes but MOST of use manage to control it. It can be frustrating at times, it's just that some people do not know how to behave eg. the above./ There are some unbearable people around. It us their problem - I suggest 'anger management'!

If anyone is intelligent enough to read between the lines, I was supporting the first two comments. Please read more carefully.

Score: -1

Letcommonsenseprevail says...9:09pm Wed 12 Feb 14

Go back to London you nasty piece of work. I hope your parents are proud of you.

Go back to London you nasty piece of work. I hope your parents are proud of you.Letcommonsenseprevail

Go back to London you nasty piece of work. I hope your parents are proud of you.

Score: 4

stevobath says...10:00pm Wed 12 Feb 14

kalebmoledirt wrote…

The Liberal wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

No doubt we are supporting this vile chav

Having checked out Limesdale Gardens on Google Street View, it hardly looks like a deprived neighbourhood. Either way, she should have received a much higher fine plus community service for her appalling behaviour. With a temper like that, I hope she doesn't have any children of her own.

People on full benefits (which given her behaviour she is unlikely to be in work)can afford to live in the more upmarket areas.And still afford to be under the the influence of whatever

How do you know she's on benefits? Also being rude & nasty isn't the priviledge of people on benefits. What a pathetic & narrow minded individual you are. Nasty people come in all shapes & sizes, classes some who work & some who don't. You come across as a bit of an a hole.

[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]The Liberal[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
No doubt we are supporting this vile chav[/p][/quote]Having checked out Limesdale Gardens on Google Street View, it hardly looks like a deprived neighbourhood. Either way, she should have received a much higher fine plus community service for her appalling behaviour. With a temper like that, I hope she doesn't have any children of her own.[/p][/quote]People on full benefits (which given her behaviour she is unlikely to be in work)can afford to live in the more upmarket areas.And still afford to be under the the influence of whatever[/p][/quote]How do you know she's on benefits?
Also being rude & nasty isn't the priviledge of people on benefits.
What a pathetic & narrow minded individual you are.
Nasty people come in all shapes & sizes, classes some who work & some who don't. You come across as a bit of an a hole.stevobath

kalebmoledirt wrote…

The Liberal wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

No doubt we are supporting this vile chav

Having checked out Limesdale Gardens on Google Street View, it hardly looks like a deprived neighbourhood. Either way, she should have received a much higher fine plus community service for her appalling behaviour. With a temper like that, I hope she doesn't have any children of her own.

People on full benefits (which given her behaviour she is unlikely to be in work)can afford to live in the more upmarket areas.And still afford to be under the the influence of whatever

How do you know she's on benefits? Also being rude & nasty isn't the priviledge of people on benefits. What a pathetic & narrow minded individual you are. Nasty people come in all shapes & sizes, classes some who work & some who don't. You come across as a bit of an a hole.

Score: 0

dylexic bobert says...10:32pm Wed 12 Feb 14

Well at least the nice police officer was able to distract her from what she was actually in there to report.

Well at least the nice police officer was able to distract her from what she was actually in there to report.dylexic bobert

Well at least the nice police officer was able to distract her from what she was actually in there to report.

Score: -1

Yankee1 says...11:21pm Wed 12 Feb 14

The 'good' news is that this story will turn up any time a potential employer carries out a background check on her. She will be googled for life.

The 'good' news is that this story will turn up any time a potential employer carries out a background check on her. She will be googled for life.Yankee1

The 'good' news is that this story will turn up any time a potential employer carries out a background check on her. She will be googled for life.

Score: 2

ASM says...12:48am Thu 13 Feb 14

losthope wrote…

Isn't it interesting that saying that to a police officer meant the case got to court, while an 'ordinary' person complaining about similar abuse yelled at them in the street would have told there was nothing they could do and left with the impression they were wasting police time?

I completely agree with your point. I should also add that police officers are used to dealing with low life scum, they should be trained and I am sure they are trained to deal with insults, as part of their job. Why would you take anything that Hill says personally? (look at her!). If they can't cope with idiotic comments, then they are in the wrong job! I also think it is a pathetic waste of time and tax payers money taking this to court. All very, very immature.

[quote][p][bold]losthope[/bold] wrote:
Isn't it interesting that saying that to a police officer meant the case got to court, while an 'ordinary' person complaining about similar abuse yelled at them in the street would have told there was nothing they could do and left with the impression they were wasting police time?[/p][/quote]I completely agree with your point.
I should also add that police officers are used to dealing with low life scum, they should be trained and I am sure they are trained to deal with insults, as part of their job. Why would you take anything that Hill says personally? (look at her!). If they can't cope with idiotic comments, then they are in the wrong job!
I also think it is a pathetic waste of time and tax payers money taking this to court.
All very, very immature.ASM

losthope wrote…

Isn't it interesting that saying that to a police officer meant the case got to court, while an 'ordinary' person complaining about similar abuse yelled at them in the street would have told there was nothing they could do and left with the impression they were wasting police time?

I completely agree with your point. I should also add that police officers are used to dealing with low life scum, they should be trained and I am sure they are trained to deal with insults, as part of their job. Why would you take anything that Hill says personally? (look at her!). If they can't cope with idiotic comments, then they are in the wrong job! I also think it is a pathetic waste of time and tax payers money taking this to court. All very, very immature.

Score: -5

suzigirl says...8:55am Thu 13 Feb 14

simcal wrote…

suzigirl wrote…

I think that the Police woman involved should have been used to this sort of abuse and let it go over her head - unfortunately that is the nature of the beast - you see worse on the fly on the wall programmes about Police on the TV!

Never thought I would agree with you. I'll put it down to having flu.

Gosh I am honoured - hope you get better soon - Vick on the chest is very good!

[quote][p][bold]simcal[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]suzigirl[/bold] wrote: I think that the Police woman involved should have been used to this sort of abuse and let it go over her head - unfortunately that is the nature of the beast - you see worse on the fly on the wall programmes about Police on the TV![/p][/quote]Never thought I would agree with you. I'll put it down to having flu.[/p][/quote]Gosh I am honoured - hope you get better soon - Vick on the chest is very good!suzigirl

simcal wrote…

suzigirl wrote…

I think that the Police woman involved should have been used to this sort of abuse and let it go over her head - unfortunately that is the nature of the beast - you see worse on the fly on the wall programmes about Police on the TV!

Never thought I would agree with you. I'll put it down to having flu.

Gosh I am honoured - hope you get better soon - Vick on the chest is very good!

Score: -2

kalebmoledirt says...9:49am Thu 13 Feb 14

stevobath wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

The Liberal wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

No doubt we are supporting this vile chav

Having checked out Limesdale Gardens on Google Street View, it hardly looks like a deprived neighbourhood. Either way, she should have received a much higher fine plus community service for her appalling behaviour. With a temper like that, I hope she doesn't have any children of her own.

People on full benefits (which given her behaviour she is unlikely to be in work)can afford to live in the more upmarket areas.And still afford to be under the the influence of whatever

How do you know she's on benefits? Also being rude & nasty isn't the priviledge of people on benefits. What a pathetic & narrow minded individual you are. Nasty people come in all shapes & sizes, classes some who work & some who don't. You come across as a bit of an a hole.

I bow to your greater knowledge of the behaviour of people that turn up in a police station miles from their own home under the influence and then feel free to spout off whatever takes their fancy,to me it is totally alien behaviour but I admit I do not have the insight you possess to be able to pass judgment on people you have never met.Madam it as been a pleasure exposing your opinions to public scrutiny.Must go have a lovely day sure your quite fragrant in reality

[quote][p][bold]stevobath[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]The Liberal[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
No doubt we are supporting this vile chav[/p][/quote]Having checked out Limesdale Gardens on Google Street View, it hardly looks like a deprived neighbourhood. Either way, she should have received a much higher fine plus community service for her appalling behaviour. With a temper like that, I hope she doesn't have any children of her own.[/p][/quote]People on full benefits (which given her behaviour she is unlikely to be in work)can afford to live in the more upmarket areas.And still afford to be under the the influence of whatever[/p][/quote]How do you know she's on benefits?
Also being rude & nasty isn't the priviledge of people on benefits.
What a pathetic & narrow minded individual you are.
Nasty people come in all shapes & sizes, classes some who work & some who don't. You come across as a bit of an a hole.[/p][/quote]I bow to your greater knowledge of the behaviour of people that turn up in a police station miles from their own home under the influence and then feel free to spout off whatever takes their fancy,to me it is totally alien behaviour but I admit I do not have the insight you possess to be able to pass judgment on people you have never met.Madam it as been a pleasure exposing your opinions to public scrutiny.Must go have a lovely day sure your quite fragrant in realitykalebmoledirt

stevobath wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

The Liberal wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

No doubt we are supporting this vile chav

Having checked out Limesdale Gardens on Google Street View, it hardly looks like a deprived neighbourhood. Either way, she should have received a much higher fine plus community service for her appalling behaviour. With a temper like that, I hope she doesn't have any children of her own.

People on full benefits (which given her behaviour she is unlikely to be in work)can afford to live in the more upmarket areas.And still afford to be under the the influence of whatever

How do you know she's on benefits? Also being rude & nasty isn't the priviledge of people on benefits. What a pathetic & narrow minded individual you are. Nasty people come in all shapes & sizes, classes some who work & some who don't. You come across as a bit of an a hole.

I bow to your greater knowledge of the behaviour of people that turn up in a police station miles from their own home under the influence and then feel free to spout off whatever takes their fancy,to me it is totally alien behaviour but I admit I do not have the insight you possess to be able to pass judgment on people you have never met.Madam it as been a pleasure exposing your opinions to public scrutiny.Must go have a lovely day sure your quite fragrant in reality

Score: -1

scrumpyjack says...10:12am Thu 13 Feb 14

suzigirl wrote…

I think that the Police woman involved should have been used to this sort of abuse and let it go over her head - unfortunately that is the nature of the beast - you see worse on the fly on the wall programmes about Police on the TV!

Oh she should just take it? The more it is simply waived off the worse it will get. We have seen the slow decline in respect in our society and the more people with your attitude the deeper in the crud we will sink. Ever heard of the phrase 'give them an inch and they'll take a mile'?

[quote][p][bold]suzigirl[/bold] wrote:
I think that the Police woman involved should have been used to this sort of abuse and let it go over her head - unfortunately that is the nature of the beast - you see worse on the fly on the wall programmes about Police on the TV![/p][/quote]Oh she should just take it?
The more it is simply waived off the worse it will get.
We have seen the slow decline in respect in our society and the more people with your attitude the deeper in the crud we will sink.
Ever heard of the phrase 'give them an inch and they'll take a mile'?scrumpyjack

suzigirl wrote…

I think that the Police woman involved should have been used to this sort of abuse and let it go over her head - unfortunately that is the nature of the beast - you see worse on the fly on the wall programmes about Police on the TV!

Oh she should just take it? The more it is simply waived off the worse it will get. We have seen the slow decline in respect in our society and the more people with your attitude the deeper in the crud we will sink. Ever heard of the phrase 'give them an inch and they'll take a mile'?

Score: 6

scrumpyjack says...10:23am Thu 13 Feb 14

ASM wrote…

losthope wrote…

Isn't it interesting that saying that to a police officer meant the case got to court, while an 'ordinary' person complaining about similar abuse yelled at them in the street would have told there was nothing they could do and left with the impression they were wasting police time?

I completely agree with your point. I should also add that police officers are used to dealing with low life scum, they should be trained and I am sure they are trained to deal with insults, as part of their job. Why would you take anything that Hill says personally? (look at her!). If they can't cope with idiotic comments, then they are in the wrong job! I also think it is a pathetic waste of time and tax payers money taking this to court. All very, very immature.

It's about respect. Be seen to allow this and all lowlifes would see it as free reign. Are you stupid or a lowlife? You have to be one or the other if you can't understand that.

[quote][p][bold]ASM[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]losthope[/bold] wrote:
Isn't it interesting that saying that to a police officer meant the case got to court, while an 'ordinary' person complaining about similar abuse yelled at them in the street would have told there was nothing they could do and left with the impression they were wasting police time?[/p][/quote]I completely agree with your point.
I should also add that police officers are used to dealing with low life scum, they should be trained and I am sure they are trained to deal with insults, as part of their job. Why would you take anything that Hill says personally? (look at her!). If they can't cope with idiotic comments, then they are in the wrong job!
I also think it is a pathetic waste of time and tax payers money taking this to court.
All very, very immature.[/p][/quote]It's about respect.
Be seen to allow this and all lowlifes would see it as free reign.
Are you stupid or a lowlife?
You have to be one or the other if you can't understand that.scrumpyjack

ASM wrote…

losthope wrote…

Isn't it interesting that saying that to a police officer meant the case got to court, while an 'ordinary' person complaining about similar abuse yelled at them in the street would have told there was nothing they could do and left with the impression they were wasting police time?

I completely agree with your point. I should also add that police officers are used to dealing with low life scum, they should be trained and I am sure they are trained to deal with insults, as part of their job. Why would you take anything that Hill says personally? (look at her!). If they can't cope with idiotic comments, then they are in the wrong job! I also think it is a pathetic waste of time and tax payers money taking this to court. All very, very immature.

It's about respect. Be seen to allow this and all lowlifes would see it as free reign. Are you stupid or a lowlife? You have to be one or the other if you can't understand that.

Score: 6

Letcommonsenseprevail says...12:24pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Why are you making the statement 'it appears she has a black partner with her'? Perhaps he has just finished work and has dirty hands?

[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it[/p][/quote]Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?[/p][/quote]Why are you making the statement 'it appears she has a black partner with her'? Perhaps he has just finished work and has dirty hands?Letcommonsenseprevail

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Why are you making the statement 'it appears she has a black partner with her'? Perhaps he has just finished work and has dirty hands?

Score: 2

Letcommonsenseprevail says...12:26pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Baysider wrote…

steelpaul wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

From the horses mouth to the donkeys rear end you would do well not to bring race creed or colour to the debate my point was, is the pram carrying her child and if so can she be trusted with it

Why not say that then? Oh that's right because it's total rubbish and it's taken you all morning to think of something that even remotely gets you out of the corner you painted yourself in to. It doesn't even stack up because you can see there's a buggy with her so whether the photo was uncropped or not it's a reasonable assumption she had a child with her. You know it, I know it and everyone reading your comment knows what you were alluding to with your reference to the photo being cropped.

Although racism is still occasionally a problem in this country, people like you who try and turn everything into a racial argument are a far bigger problem in this day and age. Shut up, just going by the thumbs downs on each of your posts, it's quite clear that everyone thinks your being a moron

The day I pay attention to the thumbs down on here and use them as my moral compass is quite a way off yet. Have you got any evidence that I try to turn everything into an argument about race? No you haven't because it's not true but on this occasion the poster made a casual remark designed to bring the race of this persons partner into the discussion. No relevance to the issue whatsoever so I challenged them. That doesn't make me some sort of politically correct, tree hugging, liberal or moronic as you so kindly put it but if the alternative is to idly accept casual racism then fair enough. She's still a thoroughly nasty piece of work though...

No you're wrong - the poster made no allusion to the colour of the person pushing the buggy. You brought that up unprompted. You sir, are an agent-provocateur, and you know it.

[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]steelpaul[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it[/p][/quote]Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?[/p][/quote]Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?[/p][/quote]From the horses mouth to the donkeys rear end you would do well not to bring race creed or colour to the debate my point was, is the pram carrying her child and if so can she be trusted with it[/p][/quote]Why not say that then? Oh that's right because it's total rubbish and it's taken you all morning to think of something that even remotely gets you out of the corner you painted yourself in to. It doesn't even stack up because you can see there's a buggy with her so whether the photo was uncropped or not it's a reasonable assumption she had a child with her.
You know it, I know it and everyone reading your comment knows what you were alluding to with your reference to the photo being cropped.[/p][/quote]Although racism is still occasionally a problem in this country, people like you who try and turn everything into a racial argument are a far bigger problem in this day and age. Shut up, just going by the thumbs downs on each of your posts, it's quite clear that everyone thinks your being a moron[/p][/quote]The day I pay attention to the thumbs down on here and use them as my moral compass is quite a way off yet.
Have you got any evidence that I try to turn everything into an argument about race? No you haven't because it's not true but on this occasion the poster made a casual remark designed to bring the race of this persons partner into the discussion. No relevance to the issue whatsoever so I challenged them. That doesn't make me some sort of politically correct, tree hugging, liberal or moronic as you so kindly put it but if the alternative is to idly accept casual racism then fair enough.
She's still a thoroughly nasty piece of work though...[/p][/quote]No you're wrong - the poster made no allusion to the colour of the person pushing the buggy. You brought that up unprompted. You sir, are an agent-provocateur, and you know it.Letcommonsenseprevail

Baysider wrote…

steelpaul wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

From the horses mouth to the donkeys rear end you would do well not to bring race creed or colour to the debate my point was, is the pram carrying her child and if so can she be trusted with it

Why not say that then? Oh that's right because it's total rubbish and it's taken you all morning to think of something that even remotely gets you out of the corner you painted yourself in to. It doesn't even stack up because you can see there's a buggy with her so whether the photo was uncropped or not it's a reasonable assumption she had a child with her. You know it, I know it and everyone reading your comment knows what you were alluding to with your reference to the photo being cropped.

Although racism is still occasionally a problem in this country, people like you who try and turn everything into a racial argument are a far bigger problem in this day and age. Shut up, just going by the thumbs downs on each of your posts, it's quite clear that everyone thinks your being a moron

The day I pay attention to the thumbs down on here and use them as my moral compass is quite a way off yet. Have you got any evidence that I try to turn everything into an argument about race? No you haven't because it's not true but on this occasion the poster made a casual remark designed to bring the race of this persons partner into the discussion. No relevance to the issue whatsoever so I challenged them. That doesn't make me some sort of politically correct, tree hugging, liberal or moronic as you so kindly put it but if the alternative is to idly accept casual racism then fair enough. She's still a thoroughly nasty piece of work though...

No you're wrong - the poster made no allusion to the colour of the person pushing the buggy. You brought that up unprompted. You sir, are an agent-provocateur, and you know it.

Score: 3

s-pb2 says...11:59pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Boscomite wrote…

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

The way I read it, was that her partner appears to be pushing a baby buggy.

Thats how I read it too. It appears baysider is the only one who has missed the point and is going on about some racist angle, havent the faintest idea why though

[quote][p][bold]Boscomite[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Baysider[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]kalebmoledirt[/bold] wrote:
Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it[/p][/quote]Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?[/p][/quote]Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?[/p][/quote]The way I read it, was that her partner appears to be pushing a baby buggy.[/p][/quote]Thats how I read it too. It appears baysider is the only one who has missed the point and is going on about some racist angle, havent the faintest idea why thoughs-pb2

Boscomite wrote…

Baysider wrote…

Baysider wrote…

kalebmoledirt wrote…

Would have been a more interesting picture if the Echo had not cropped it

Are you saying that because it appears she has a black partner with her? She sounds like a disgustingly offensive person but I fail to see the relevance of your post, perhaps you could explain?

Still waiting for the relevance of the skin colour of the man with her to be explained. Perhaps one of those who flagged my post would like to explain it to me instead then?

The way I read it, was that her partner appears to be pushing a baby buggy.

Thats how I read it too. It appears baysider is the only one who has missed the point and is going on about some racist angle, havent the faintest idea why though

Ipsoregulated

This website and associated newspapers adhere to the Independent Press Standardards Organisations's Editors' Code of Practice. If you have a compaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then please contact the editor here. If you are dissatisfied with the response provided you can contact IPSO here