How to Destroy a Nation Without Firing a Bullet

Came across this incisive article ” How To Bring Down A Nation” by Colonel Dan. When we apply the parameters to Bharat, it seems that the enemies of Bharat have successfully been able to attack the centre of gravity of the nation, thus creating a situation of destabilisation in the country and self-loathe among the Hindus. In order to move on the path of correction, the true nationals of Bharat must be able to address the points.

The complete article is blogged below. However, the orginal can be read here.

How to Bring Down a Nation

Colonel Dan, SASS #24025, Life/Regulator

If you were intent on bringing down a powerful rival whose philosophy, as originally founded, was strong, independent and entirely opposite from your own—a country that you would not want to confront militarily—how would you go about it? The answer is simple; orchestrate the society’s destruction from within.

Although possibly taking longer than a military victory and requiring great patience, the damage would be just as effective if not more so. When you destroy from within, you do it by using that country’s own people, no blood is spilled in combat and the physical infrastructure is left intact.

In any country, there are but a few key areas that determine how the citizens mature, live, and develop their beliefs. These are the focal points that must be attacked. In his book, On War, Clausewitz referred to this concept of identifying and then focusing on select points as attacking the center of gravity.

The center of gravity is that key element, if controlled or destroyed, would most hurt your opponent and is the critical factor in achieving your objective. In this case, when taking control of or destroying a country from within, the key is to attack and control the mind of the inhabitants—you must shape the way people view life and the values upon which their life is based. Shape the mind and you control their direction. Control their direction and you can lead them down a pathway to hell.

The centers of gravity I would shape in orchestrating a country’s downfall from within are its perception of truth, its future generations, the political philosophy, its sense of nationalism and of course, the economy.

To shape truth, control the media: Most people absorb what they know about life from the major media centers these days. The media paints the picture for all to see. If that picture is constantly distorted, lies become accepted as truth, i.e. tell enough lies repeatedly and soon those lies are accepted as fact. Spin and concoct, distort and influence using the public platforms such as television, radio and print and you can influence, sway and control the mind of the vast majority of its population in any area you choose. This subversive influence includes pitting one group against another in order to foment internal discord as well as ridiculing, discrediting and challenging moral principles and national values in order to destroy any hint of a strong spiritual foundation or allegiance to a unique national culture. This is a much easier task if many in your target audience have become lazy, ill-educated, ill-informed, unthinking and apathetic.

To shape future generations, control the schools: Incrementally indoctrinate the children with principles that are sympathetic to your philosophy. Make future generations weak in mind, body and spirit. Avoid teaching children the basic facts about their own history, constitution or rights. Teach them that natural aggression is wrong and docile submission is right. Teach them that any basis of a moral foundation, like the principles of religion, is a weakness to be avoided in the name of freedom and also redefine the concept of patriotism to support your views. Teach them to cast off old values and traditions in the interest and name of sensitivity—after all, we wouldn’t want to offend anyone with our old fashioned or traditional beliefs now would we? And guns, guns are wicked, dangerous, and socially unacceptable—an evil that must be eradicated from society—for the good of the children of course.

To shape the political philosophy, infiltrate the government: Whenever and wherever possible place those sympathetic to your philosophy into office at all levels—the higher, the better—so they can sway the direction of the country within every function of government, promising solutions, handouts and benefits for all. In such a way you can tilt legislation toward incrementally increasing the control of and dependency on government—a government that you are shaping. Concurrently, if you can pack the courts with appointed judges who will not hold you accountable to the law and its constitution, you can act with virtual impunity. Infiltration at the highest levels can also be employed to weaken the military through budget cuts, unwarranted restrictions and over commitment, degrading both force morale and effectiveness. A country without a strong military is like a bull without horns or a tiger without claws—defenseless and vulnerable.

To shape the sense of nationalism, dilute the culture and the language: A strong society has at its foundation a unique culture and a common language. Simply put, it is the culture and language which ultimately defines and unites a nation. If you can manipulate these two critical elements through legislative action and social pressure, you can weaken the foundation of any country. How? Introduce and eventually force the acceptance of a multi-cultural concept and refuse to accept a common tongue as the official language. In short, prevent cultural assimilation and undermine any sense of nationalism. Encourage and orchestrate a mosaic society rather than a melting pot and you will eventually mortally wound the national fabric.

To shape the economy, spend, spend, spend and tax, tax, tax: A country with a strong economy is financially independent and its people unlikely to look toward the government for much of anything. If free people don’t depend on their government, that government has limited sway over them. By legislating large sums from the public treasury you accomplish two important goals. First you create dependents of the public and private business that are now subject to conditions, rules and regulations you dictate. Secondly, you are putting that country into unsustainable debt, reducing the value of the currency while undermining its economy. And of course, to support all this spending, you now make the case that the people must “invest” in all these government provided “benefits” so you tax them relentlessly stealing money from their pockets and independence from their lives. Eventually, if you tax and spend enough, you financially oppress the people to the point of serfdom and overload their economic structure to the point of collapse.

Through patient manipulation and clever coordination of these few centers of gravity, you can, in time, weave the downfall of even the most powerful nation, using its own citizens and systems to orchestrate the destruction.

The irony is that in just a few generations, the indoctrinated masses will be convinced this trail which has been shaped for them is truly the enlightened path for mankind and they will unwittingly look forward to the trip! You have thus taken control of a powerful rival without firing a shot or spilling a drop of blood.

Addition in Jan 2014

A video showing how a nation is taken over through education. This is a video of a former KGB agent, Yuri Bezmenov. The recent developments in Bharat where commies seem to be re-emerging under various garbs of anti-corruption and other civil society movements, it would be good to view how the whole process brainwashing works. It also shows how people with good intentions are used by the communists and pink-communists and by the time they realize, it is too late. Full Video

12 thoughts on “How to Destroy a Nation Without Firing a Bullet”

When Israel came into entity, the leaders were visioned..to bring unity amongst all migrants they adapted Hebrew as the national language it binds all Jews..the sad fact that Sanskrit was proposed as national language of India, on Independence ( The Southern India would not have objected as the root of the language being Sanskrit) but as we all know how divisive now India is..on language cast and religion..the so called neo secularist are creating a chasm amongst peoples. And Indians being racist? Of course they are..just pick up a marriage ad in any Indian News Paper and its all about colour of the skin..I rest my case

How come Multi cultural ism be a weakness? In fact this is our strength. It is the way some non resident Indians of Hindu faith who try to inject their lack of self respect in the country of earning like USA, Canada,UK wherre latent racism exists into India which is the real danger. Urdu and Islam did not keep Pakistan into one single entity.Inspite of various languages and Hindi zealots trying to inject sanskritised Hindi into India as national language which created separatism in Tamilnadu and other areas of India. today it is Hindi films which is evolving as unifying force by assimilating all the variousl colours of India.Soon English and bollywood Hindi will be emerging as the new lingua franca of India.

It is surprising that a person who is a Captain talks about racism in India. The concept of India being multi-races is itself an idealogical construct by the forces who are out to destroy the Indian nation. India is one nation and one race. Change in faith does not change the race. The challenge when faiths that preach exclusivism attack the core culture of the land which is pluralism. This nature of pluralism of India is because of Hindu Dharma. This is acknowledged by non-Hindus like Annie Beasant and more recently MJ Akbar.

I never said racism exists in India. It exists in the mind of NRIs who face them in their home country.India is one nation and how one can doubt it.I agree that Pluralism is the core culture and also agree that it is because of Hindus who are in Majority. My fore fathers may be 200 or 300 years back must have been Hindus. how can I deny that. Even Syrian Christians who trace their faith to the time of Jesus Christ must have been Hindus before 2000 years back. But My great grand father was a Sri Lankan Christian while my grand father from mothers side was sanskrit teacher from Kerala! My wife who is from Rajasthan
has a trace of Iranian blood from her mother’s side.
today we have 18 crore Muslims in India and may be 2 crore odd Christians and so what we do about them? It is the core Bharathiya culture which unites us.this cannot be understood by the NRIs who carry their inferiority complex of
their country which feeds them

Captain — you are a product Christian Missionary education from India. Those of us who have been brought up in the West were not force fed this Macauly education to create ” brown sahibs”. We have been taught to challenge history written by victors of colonialism. Sanskrit is mother of all languages including latin and greek. It is a pitiable situation that indians resent their rich cultural heritage and instead ape the west!

It is the ignoramuses like our first president who decisively changed the fate of this country by voting for Hindi ahead of Sanskrit, but the fact that those folks could not identify “Sanskritized Hindi” as belonging to India and preferred English over another Indian language, shows their cultural affinity and loyalty. Had English been driven out, India would be truly self-reliant today – having its own education system, industry and infrastructure.

That aside, Bollywood is hardly uniting Indians – it is just another subversion instrument, similar to missionary schools. They never seek to unite – they seek to subvert.

Its working for Islam and christians.55 islamic nation lost their language, culture and history.
100 christian nations all pagan ways destroyed .
These two religions have destroyed the diversity and now trying to kill each other and others not one of them.

How Shall We Recover our Lost Intellectual Freedom

Sri Aurobindo says " How shall we recover our lost intellectual freedom? By reversing, for the time being, the process by which we lost it, by liberating our minds in all subjects from the thralldom to authority. The Anglicized ask us to abandon authority, revolt against superstition to have free minds. What they mean is that we should renounce authority of the Vedas for Max Muller, the Monism of Sankara for the Monism of Haeckel, the dogmatisms of Pandits for the dogmatisms of European thinkers, scientists and scholars. Let us break our chains in order to be free, in the name of truth, not in the name of Europe.

Our first necessity, if India is to survive and do her appointed work in the world, is that the youth of India should learn to think, - to think on all subjects, to think independently, fruitfully, going to the heart of things, not stopped by their surface, free of prejudgments, shearing sophism and prejudice asunder as with a sharp sword, smiting down obscurantism of all kinds as with the mace of Bhima…”.