Contents

Eligibility Requirements

Not nominate yourself. You can vote for yourself, but you can't nominate yourself.

Not have been banned for more than a day in the previous month, but post-nomination bannings do not disqualify a candidate.

Consistently write crap.

Who to Vote For?

Nominate the Writer who has contributed the most "point free" articles or inane edits over the past month. Additional points may be awarded for bad grammar, lack of punctuation, and images created in MS Paint.

If you have a specific gripe or mutual hate with someone who doesn't exactly fit the requirements, don't take it here. Ban Patrol and FFS are that way. --->

Fabulous Prizes

Winners will get:

"Looked at" funny

Mocked by their "peers" until their ears bleed

Huffed mercilessly

The chance to add the prefix "Pleb" to your name, and wear it like a badge.

NOMINATE!!!

Go ahead and nominate now. Only signed votes will count. Users can only vote once, and new vote supersedes old vote. Please use the level two headline format for the name of the nomination with an optional comment and mandatory signature underneath.

Official Nominations for September

Nom and For. IRC is where people come to complain about bans, and nobody causes more moaning and whining then this man. More often then not, I've had to spend at least a minute explaining to a banned user how little I cared about Famine banning them for being a vandal. This has kept me from doing other things, like pretending to care if I have one foot or two. Also, in amongst all the great stuff that he "does around the site"

STRONG FOR - Despite his cool Gothic-font sig, "he's so tight that if you stuck a lump of coal up his ass, in two weeks you'd have a diamond." I know, because Olipro told me and this is his area of "expertise". --Lord Fluffy who rains fire from the heavens 22:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

FOR!. This guy hasn't made a dozen contributions over the last month. Hell, Villahj_Ideeut does more than this lazy chump! --T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:24, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Nom + For - Might as well nominate for gobshite while I still can. This user keeps writing stupid shit, vandalizes pages, had the nerve to call me a jackass on my own talk page. Desperately needs this award. --Kip>Talk•Works•• 19:14, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Nom & For - Let's see. He stole my Cheeseboy line on SotM, he floods VFD, and dicks with FFS. He's used a sockpuppet, and also noms crappy articles on VFH, as well as other stupid noms on voting pages. Also, he's one of the other 8+ idiots who stole my infobox. Sorry Manforman, but this is how I feel. --AAA!(AAAA) 01:04, 1 September 2007 (UTC) - Change vote

... who stole my infobox ... says the person whose very username is taken from someone else's article, and has apparently never used a template that he didn't create. •Spang•☃•talk•06:57, 03 Sep 2007

Comment - You can give this award to me if you wish, but I don't care. This is equivalent to burning books just because there were written by Adolf Hitler, what will this accomplish?

How is this funny? All it is is hurtful and is an attack towards users who aren't necessarily good as other users.

A lot of users besides myself has been offended by this award, I cannot participate in a community full of mean assholes and have decided to quit Uncyclopedia forever. Fuck Uncyclopedia--SirManforman 01:20, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Strong Against Even though I was mad at him, you all ought to be ashamed. He may be annoying some times, but he was far from useless. And now he is gone. I hope ya'll are happy. --Kip>Talk•Works•• 01:25, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

*Reluctant, but strong, For I really wanted manforman to be a good uncyclopedian. I gave him the benefit of the doubt in my mind. Vfd and Qvfd, no big deal I thought. Being a general asshat, well so are a lot of users. But the fact that every damn article is an unfunny political assault, the fact that he continues to go on annoying people, after being warned, time and time again, his comments above, etc., well, I'm honestly not upset to see him go. -RAHB 03:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Just because you don't like me nor my writings doesn't make me a gobshite. And that it is not true that every article is an unfunny political assault. I am re-writing Booger King for Conservation week. And I haven't annoyed users since July--SirManforman 13:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Strong support He started a flamewar with me because he said that I couldn't ask to be nommed for VFS, even though there was no rule saying that I couldn't. He deserved this award for a very long time, and now we shall give it to him. --GeneralInsineratehymn 03:11, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Against. You're all taking this a bit too seriously. He has been trying to improve ever since Famine blocked him. ~ 12:09, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

For - Anybody who takes UGotM seriously deserves UGotM. Judging by his recent contributions, he takes UGotM a lot more seriously than VFD and VFH, which is rather worrying to say the least. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 12:17, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Against - those reasons above are the most stupid reasons, and a lot of the users were wrong in there reasoning...

High Gen. Grue, where does it say you tought me the internet was just words? All you said in that flamewar settlement was "Okay. So we know each side of the story. So, Manforman, giving him the Brain Award was okay, but calling him "a dick that dosen't know it" and constand flaming is exactly what Cookies,yum! did to Andorin Kato. We all know what appened to him... So Manforman, why are you antagonizing and leaving angry messages on Insineratehymn's talk page? And Insineratehymn, why didn't you just ignore Manforman? NOBODY is innocent right now. --Lt. High Gen. Grue Comlink Grue Army UNSOC 23:23, 12 July 2007 (UTC)" Yes, the internet is just words, but words can be very hurtful

That stupid flamewar was nearly 2 months ago, Insineratehymn. You need to move on from things that happened in the past, focus on what's going on now, not what happened then.

I never would take this award seriously if it wasn't for the fact that everybody voted for me. In fact, I nominated Jimbo Wales to lighten up, I think this award can be mean towards users, which is why I nominated a user who never edits here instead of an active editor.

I have tried hard to be a good Uncyclopedian and nobody pays attention to the stuff I have tried to do, see my contributions and my articles for, and instead, users such as AAA! have focused on minor edits, such as the Fisher Price nomination on VFH, which I retracted. There is nothing wrong with flooding VFD, just as long as it doesn't break the 15 rule limit. The FFS nomination was a joke and what's wrong with steeling AAA's line on SotM, I did it because I liked it.

I thank the people who voted against me, and I still will not come back to edit here.--SirManforman 13:22, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

I thought you weren't coming back here. Look, at some point, tis award is voted on by a bunch of people on the Internets. Why are you taking this so personally?. The fact remains that you did what you did, and the defining difference is that when other people have made mistakes, they actually fix them. If you read the comments, you'll see exactly why you were voted for it, and given your history, it's justifiable. Given this failure of a rant, you haven't learned a thing. If that's not enough for gobshite, I don't know what it.

By the way, If it hurts you so badly, don't live up to it by whining and complaining. Several people have gone from Gobshite nominees/winners to functional users; if you want to make people feel bad, throw it back in their faces by improving and learning something, maybe even winning UotM, WotM, or AotM instead of attention-whoring yourself out to the masses in a poor attempt to be a martyr. Otherwise, go home; we don't need you and your caterwauling here.--SirFlammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 13:48, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Take Zombiebaron for example. He's an admin now. Look at me. I didn't win the Useless Gobshite award but people thought I was a serious risk. Read these conversations here & here. Sir Cornbiscuit is quoted as sayin' "Oh and one last thing, I'm up for Uncyclopedian Of The Month. I think what I do just might be appreciated.". Well, guess what? He never received UotM... but I did. How, you might say? I turned myself 'round. I continued to work but harder than ever before. Now just look at me. I'm a highly respected individual*. I stopped bein' an arse to the majority of people. I learned to not take anythin' serious on here because why bother with hate & anger. Hell, a userbox even helped me to change my ways. Look at it this way. Come back, accept all this as it is & learn from it like I did. I retract my vote & resubmit it as A☭AINST. Laugh it off, comrade. It'll make you feel better. *Just let me believe it, okay?

Sheesh. I thought UGotM was a joke. Also retracting vote, and, because it's getting so personal, I'll also resubmit as an Against. Sorry, Manforman, I guess this award walks a very fine line between "joke" & "insult" every month. I voted thinking "joke". –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings• SU&W) 17:04 Sep 01, 2007

Comment - I thought it was a joke as well, which is why I nominated Jimbo Wales for UGotM. It's just that some of the comments were personal on me and I was getting offended. If I offended someone, sorry, and I'll try to be more useful and take the award less seriously. And yes, I won't leave Uncyclopedia--SirManforman 17:21, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

*I'm still voting for. This guy's broken the 2nd golden rule of Uncyclopedia more times than anyone else, with the exception of maybe Nintendorulez. You can protest all you want Manforman, but you deserve this award, and you brought this upon yourself.--PhlegmLeoispotter*(garble! jank!) 00:06, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Comment Whoa, that was rather bitter. I'll strike my vote because as Manforman put it, this page is just a joke anyway. --PhlegmLeoispotter*(garble! jank!) 00:13, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Exactly .68 of a For, failed to leave Uncyclopedia for more than one day according to above notice. Also, has anyone else noticed that there's no rule here explicitly stating "you can only vote once" here? ЖKalir, Crazy Indie Gamer(missile ponies for everyone!) 04:15, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Against. This "award" is less and less of a joke each month. Everyone needs to lighten up. •Spang•☃•talk•06:41, 03 Sep 2007

Comment if this is 3 days into the month, it looks like she's gunna be a long one.. Continuamos! --THINKER 09:26, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Against. I haven't seen any crime here worthy of UGotM. I have, however, seen (again) why I dislike this page so much. Remember SU182's bad...everything? Remember Drama's entirely fictional crimes? Those were worthy gobshites. Manforman's only faults appear to be over-eagerness, nudity, and poor taste in VFH noms. Flooding VFD? As long as it wasn't over the 15 article limit, isn't that a good thing? Stealing userboxes? Aw, muffin. Call me when he steals a WIP from someone's sandbox and releases it as his own. Seriously, call me. We'll do lunch. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 13:25, 3 September 2007 (UTC) Damnit. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 22:56, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Will you stop attacking users? The fact is, at the time, he had less than than 10 contributions, one being voting for TheLedBalloon on UnBooks:Author of the month and his articles on VFH. I am not the only person who thought he was a puppet-master as well. I had the right to think he was a sockpuppet and the right to express it, even though he wasn't. It was a mistake, when you make a mistake, you move on, don't make personal attacks.--SirManforman 19:37, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

You forgot Zeldafan, aka Mr. "screw helpful criticism, Chuck Norris shall rule the universe". It was like trying to argue intelligently with that hyperactive six-year-old I know. Y'know, the one who isn't a philosopher. ЖKalir, Crazy Indie Gamer(missile ponies for everyone!) 19:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Manforman was perfectly in the right mind when accusing UnIdiot of being Led's sock. I believed it myself 'till Led cleared things up. This doesn't change the fact that I still think he's worthless. However, I withdraw my vote, in favor of a better candidate. -RAHB 09:24, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Against. As per Modusoperandi.--YeOldeLuke 03:12, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Adolf Hitler and his clones said to vote for. --Dexter111344 01:39, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Support. He's following me around, basically being an a$$, and then he nominates me for this "award"? WTF??? -- Le Cejak•<-> 05:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Nom+For This guy has been editing since January, and from what I can see, he's useless. I encountered him in IRC, where he was flooding, spamming, and being a general asshat. He then proceeded to vandalize my userpage, knowingly and willingly. I looked into it, and found that A) He's contributed nothing useful, and B) He has violated the vanity "policy" several times. In featured articles like AAA, and others, he simply writes passages worth of unfunny shit, whilst leaving his mark of vanity on the page. Ok, I'm done now. -RAHB 09:24, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

FOR -- I was there with RAHB when he showed up on IRC. He's a ten-year-old who is into Ben10 and Code Lyoko. He admitted to a handful of minor vandalism/really really bad writing. What more could you want in a Gobshite? P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs)21:32, Sep 7, 2007