27

If you do this right, they can't be removed. You place a watermark that is unique to each user, and it consists of very subtle color alterations of the pixels comprising the watermark, which can be off to the corner somewhere. You would never be able to see the effect of this.

If the webmaster wants to identify the downloader of a given image, all they have to do is subtract the pixels of their un-watermarked master copy from the watermarked image.

This cannot be decoded or removed without the master file, so there would be no way to defeat it.

Again, I would be fine with this. I once saw it implemented really badly though, with a semi-translucent alphanumeric code watermark right in the middle of the field of view. Ugh!

28

Just to clarify, I don't mean DRM in the sense that you can't copy or view it without any restrictions. I just mean they added an invisible watermark or some other means of identifying each downloader on a master list.

I have joined a few sites that did this, and it doesn't bother me. You've got nothing to worry about as long as you don't pirate the content. As long as you are not pirating the content, then the only way anyone could use the codes to identify you is if they found the porn on your hard drive, but in that case I think they would know its yours anyways.

I'm surprised more sites haven't done this. I've seen sites close, with the owners complaining about the usual, no money in porn, piracy, etc, yet they never tried anything like this.

29

Sad but true about the drop off in new content. There were years when there were over a hundred new sites featuring peeing, now last year I don't think I could name ten new ones, and many more closed than opened.

30

She recently posted an update on her landing page that explains some of the changes that people have commented on recently:

"My site has gone through many changes since its launch way back in 1998 and due to the change in the law here in the UK at the end of 2014 with regards online content I have been given the chance to make perhaps the biggest change of all. The site is now exclusively themed around the content that I enjoy myself which is all about classic glamour and the exotic. I am not interested in ANY explicit content at all myself so if this is what you are looking for you will not find any here! Lady-Sonia.com is all about REAL women who love to dress to show off. Fully fashioned nylons, classic lingerie, pantyhose, high heels and the sort of things that a lady wears to REALLY get attention. This is the world that I love and the world that I want to share with you!
Enjoy :-) xx "

She may be moving away from porn and back towards escorting.

Also, for my fellow pee fans out there, yes, her peeing content is gone now. Hope you got it while you had the chance.

34

Dude, I wouldn't touch that stuff with a 10 foot pole, and if I could delete it all with a keystroke right now I would.

Off the top of my head, here's some of the legal stuff that's been censored:

PornstarPunishment.com

This has been beat to death on other forums. Posts supposedly from a Brazzers.com employee have implicated it to VISA, of course, you can take that with a grain of salt. This same poster, who is supposedly charged with reviewing Brazzers content, wrote about some the other criteria for removal which include models in pigtails, because it is too suggestive of underage, and models drinking alcohol on the set.

Owner wrote in an article on XBiz.com how he was forced to close when his payment processor cut him off. This actually wasn't because the content was too extreme, but he was a UK operator, and he failed to comply with ATVOD. Rather that allow him to work it out, his payment processor just terminated his account, and rather than try to find another processor, he just closed up shop.

Along this note, sites forced to close or remove content by ATVOD could be added to the list, and there are many of those.

YellowDiscipline.com

It is relatively common knowledge that F2M peeing may be permissible in small quantities on US sites, but M2F peeing is off limits. This is one of many US sites that specialized in M2F peeing that have closed over the years. Do I like M2F peeing - not at all - but it still proves my point. Some people do enjoy it though, and these sites shouldn't have had to close.

There's another huge group of sites totaling in the 100's that have categorically been censored by the credit card processors. Sites that featured #2, which I am not into, but also had tons of other content that was legit. I won't list them all, because these sites pushed the limits too much for mention here. I will just mention one.

Veronica-Moser.com

This is the best example, because if you go to her new page on Hightide (ask me if you want the link, but be warned), she explains in detail how credit card processors forced her to take down her site. She did lots of straight up peeing shoots that were legit, but they went down with the ship. We have talked about her peeing content, although not about this idea, but she is an example of someone who might be open to this distribution model.

37

I think that you, me, and lots of people feel this way. There are so many posts on all the porn forums looking for this or that video that someone saw 10 years ago that they can't for the life of them find anymore. For lots of porn fans, it seems that these old videos are actually the most sought out content.

It gets me thinking, if only there were a way to purchase the older stuff together with the rights and necessary documents for distribution, or license it, and bring more of it back. Or, for the older stuff that went down due to payment processor restrictions, to find alternative methods of monetizing its distribution. There could be huge potential here, if anyone could figure this one out.

39

It looks like MC-Nudes.com must have acquired the content from the now closed site teenrotica.com, and they are uploading it, including the peeing sets. This is great news. I hope that now that MC-Nudes.com has crossed the line into peeing, maybe they will shoot some new content of their own!

46

There was nothing out of the ordinary in them for content, and the models Tanja and Lena feature regularly in their other videos. I can only speculate, but there doesn't seem to have been a reason for them to remove these particular videos. They did renovate their site, and sometimes content gets lost accidentally in those situations.

47

I'll check it out the next time I'm at Twistys. Someone once told me their older peeing shoots were amazing, so my curiosity is piqued. Also, I think all of Twistys' peeing shoots were pre-2007, including Justine Joli and Amber Michaels.

48

Nope. The two sites I downloaded in their final state right before closing happened purely by chance. I wish there were a way of knowing, like if sites had going out of business sales, but it's usually impossible to predict.

49

50

"You need to upgrade to see all the older / oldest content they have." (Wittyguy)

Can you give more details on this please? I recently joined Twistys for two reasons - Justine Joli and Amber Michaels peeing. I found what I was looking for. I also heard that Twistys had more peeing content than this in the past, but I could not find it. Support blew off my request for help.

Protecting MinorsWe are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.