Building 6?? What happened?

Originally posted by Insolubrious
Dave, if you want some real information why don't you try buying yourself a couple of terrabytes of digital storage like I have and downloading the
FOIA 911 dataset archives, go and study that and come back to me. The pictures in your book are probably 0.1% of the content available at this
website.

I have two 500 gig NAS drives on my home network, actually, one for my MP3 collection and the other for general file storage, but this is neither here
nor there. What am I looking for that photographs taken by someone who was standing right inside WTC 6 wouldn't show?

Ignore me, I misread your previous post, but since you replied 2x500 GB is 1TB so you might need a few more drives if you want to download a
significant portion of it. The data has been released via the FOIA, there's much information contained within that was previously withheld so I do
recommend you check it out...

Ignore me, I misread your previous post, but since you replied 2x500 GB is 1TB so you might need a few more drives if you want to download a
significant portion of it. The data has been released via the FOIA, there's much information contained within that was previously withheld so I do
recommend you check it out...

I will do so and I thank you for the reference. I have given you a star for providing information I haven't seen before...but that doesn't answer
the question- what is in this material that wouldn't be in the photographs take by someone who was physically standing inside WTC 6?

Hmm well considering the data in the archive is much more detailed including video and shots from above and outside building 6 that has been collected
from numerous sources one can draw better conclusions. This goes for all the events on 911 in general, if you're really that interested you should
take a look at these archives. Still I would point out they have been some what sterilized as with any public release of information, some things are
just not allowed or out of bounds as you can imagine.

Originally posted by GenRadek
If there was a massive detonation that managed to rip a hole in the roof and spray debris all over, then, why didnt ANYONE in a helicopter, or a
building above the site notice a gaping hole in WTC6?

Possibly because they had a script, and mentioning WT6 was not in the script for obvious reasons...

I'be been saying for a long time that if you truthers would only stop squandering your money on Richard Gage's conferences and those fifteen
versions of Loose Change and look into what the real people who were actually there saw, 98% of your questions would have been answered already. I
mean look at this very thread- it's been known that building 6 had an open court in the center of the building all this time and yet you're still
wondering about the "mysterious crater" over ten years later. Hechk, you don't even wait to ask "why is there a big hole there" before you go
into your "bombs planted by sinister secret boogeymen" routine.

'Nuff said.

Oh dear, making assumptions about 'truthers' again are we! The whole purpose to label us 'truthers' is to try and make us feel bad for
disbeleiving something. You assume that everyone is paying for info etc, massive fail. Most people are doing their own real research based on real
facts, nothing to do with these type of sites.

So if you have any intelligence, please use it to understand that not everything is as black and white as you assume, and we all know assumption is
the mother of all f**** ups!

To make a such sweeping generalisation about people who disbelive all of the OS just shows you have a serious lack of judgement and should walk away
from making further comments. Unless the shill pay cheque is too good to refuse, because all your comment make you look like a shill, or someone with
a very specifically limited narrow mind on this subject.

I think i'm gonna start calling people like you 'fakers' the opposite of truthers, because that in essence is what you really are.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.