There's no certainty if Jim will be in this sequel or what character he will play... Although fans are starting to trow a few idea on Jim character Jim would be suited for.

What do you guys think?

Personally, I'm sick and tired of the whole Spider Man franchising. I wanna see something different but if the rumor is true and Jim does a character we haven't seen yet, I think it will be pretty cool.

I'm a guardian of the spark...I'm a God damn and proud good fan... and I love it! = )>

I hope he's not playing Jonah Jameson, cause ... Let's be honest, J.K. Simmons nailed that and is not replacable. He's been rumored for Carnage before when Raimi made SpiderMan 3. Would they introduce that character in Amazing SpiderMan 2? While they have two big villains already? Doubt it. Although, it's possible we just see him in a short cameo and he will be the big one in Amazing SpiderMan 3.

Above all, I would like to see him as Norman Osborn and (ofcours) later ... The Goblin. He would be fantastic with make-up, that role is made for Carrey. I still hate the suit they used in the first one, by Raimi.

IF he just wasn't around to visit someone on set, Paul for excample.

And (again, IF) he's not OK with Kick-Ass but would be OK with Spider-Man? Hmmm.

This is all very confusing... ^^The movie hasn't premiere yet but it's already in post-production phase.In IMDB he's not mention...(although that's no guarantee, either way).I guess we'll have to wait and see...

I'm a guardian of the spark...I'm a God damn and proud good fan... and I love it! = )>

Ok I have never watched any of the Spiderman movies but arent they just as violent as Kick Ass? After choosing not to promote violence he is gonna do another violent movie? I think this nothing more then a rumor

cotton wrote:Ok I have never watched any of the Spiderman movies but arent they just as violent as Kick Ass? After choosing not to promote violence he is gonna do another violent movie? I think this nothing more then a rumor

This was dated back in March when he visited the set, apparently. Way before he said anything about being against violence in movies. And no, Spider-Man is not as violent as Kick-Ass.

I would love it, this means that Jim again love to try different things, last time something like this happend whas at the beginning of his career when he played Riddler so this is good he is PERFECT to play BAD guy in BIG movie and doing again Dumb and Dumber it's awesome just shut up and whach his work!!!

"It's Going To Be LEGEND wait for it DARY.....LEGENDARY"-Barney Stinson(How i met your mother!)

One of my children the other day saidthat the person he played (the majician)was a pretty mean character.

When I saw the movie I thought that tooI did mention that he can't always play the good guyand that he does have to do the other side sometimes.

Personally I think the general public would rather seeand feel light hearted laughter than the evil-side of thingsWe all know it's there and with all the evil /bad stuff going ontoday, sometimes ya just need a good laugh.

There is both positive and negative point in doing this role (According to me). Negative is "I am not very keen to see Jim in a negative (villain) role". Positive is " all of us can watch the movie in Theatre as this one would get a worldwide release not like BurtWonderstone or Kick Ass" (Still i doubt whether Kick ass2 will be released in my country).