Friday, October 22, 2010

Fool on the Hill

Seriously, how fucked up are the Thomases - both Ginni and Clarence?

First, that wench expecting a 19 year old apology. But Clarence (not enough bells will ever ring to get his wings!) implied Anita Hill should also apologize during some autobiography he allegedly wrote.

...which by the way, why would you write your autobiography before your term in the Supreme Court was about 2/3 through and not like 9/10 complete? The man is all ego.....and nothing to back it up.

Here is what I want out of a Supreme Court justice - even a conservative one - one that actually talks and asks questions in court.

I don't know about 2010, but in a NYT article reported that Thomas had not asked a question from the bench in over - get this - four years!!!!

So he's letting all the other justices do the heavy lifting while he sits his fat ass on the bench and then makes decisions that affect certain individuals, presidential elections and national law??

And then he has the nerve to demand an apology from a woman, who not only told the truth, but did it under subpoena? Hill didn't even want to testify, so it's not like she had some huge vendetta against the man. And it's not like it even cost him the job - he still got it!

Of course, part of me - just a smidge - thinks Ginni has had it up to here with Clarence and is just fucking with him with her righter than Tea Party fund raising and this passive-aggressive call to Hill (seriously? Over the weekend and to her office??). Maybe she's trying to humiliate the man for something he's done and she's just tired of it.