NATIONAL ARCHIVES

A GUIDE TO THE USA CONSTITUTION

Pledging Allegiance

NOTE: In 1954, in response to the Communist threat of the times, President Eisenhower encouraged Congress to add the words “under God,” creating the 31-word pledge we say today. Bellamy’s daughter objected to this alteration.

Today it reads:

“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”

HWH ARCHIVES

culture

HWH NOTE: The world needs laws that are enforced. Simply having a law does not guarantee compliance. It should, if we all had integrity, but it doesn’t and we don’t. Some people will skirt the law looking for loopholes, others will outright defy it, if they can get away with it.

When enforcement of laws is down due to budgetary or corrupt reasons, then it’s open season as far as how some people interpret their right to do what they want to do regardless of laws prohibiting certain behaviors.

If it’s not bolted down, it belongs to whoever wants it. Stealing is a word that the entire world understands – even in the most remote areas on the planet, stealing is taking something or someone that or who doesn’t belong to you. Stealing denotes that something or someone is taken without consent – something that is not the property of the one stealing what is not theirs to own.

In America, black pastors tell American blacks to steal whatever they want, just don’t steal from other blacks; steal from white people. This results in rich American blacks feeling justified in not helping less fortunate American blacks out of the ranks of poverty.

Pastors are motivated to comply, because they’ll be financially rewarded by the rich American blacks in the congregation. They earned their money; they’re not going to give it away to anybody – even to help a brother and sister out. Put it on the white man, the white guy. Anything white. That’s tribal. That’s the tribal culture that Barak Obama when president said was okay with him. “Being tribal is okay”.

They learn this in church. It’s part of their culture.

Hispanics, the same thing. Big on stealing and big on gaming the system. Gypsies, same thing.

All cultures steal. The difference is that in some cultures stealing becomes a systemic problem. And in other cultures, although some engage, they know they shouldn’t. They know it’s wrong. Guilt will prohibit many from engaging at all. With others there is knowledge of guilt, but they do it anyway.

The guilt factor is important in reducing the amount of overall theft within any culture and/or outside of any culture, where guilt is a valid tool of conscience in controlling individual and group behavior.

Many cultures see nothing at all wrong with doing anything you can get away with. That probably explains why so many American blacks are in jail or prison. It’s all a matter of cultures clashing.

So where the conscience begins and ends varies from culture to culture.

Culture clashing – specifically in areas of conscience – creates the most chaos and havoc between and among cultures.

Botswana: 87 elephants killed near wildlife sanctuary

Botswana’s anti-poaching unit underwent budget cuts in May, leading to an increase in poaching since then.

4 Sept 2018

Botswana boasts the largest elephant population in the world [Mike Hutchings/Reuters]

The carcasses of 87 elephants have been found near a wildlife sanctuary in Botswana, in what conservation group Elephants Without Borders called “the largest scale of elephant poaching to date”.

The remains were discovered during an aerial survey near a protected elephant sanctuary, the group said on Facebook.

Talking to the BBC, Mike Chase of Elephants Without Borders said he was shocked by the discovery of the elephants, who had their tusks removed for their ivory.

“When I compare this to figures and data from the Great Elephant Census, which I conducted in 2015, we are recording double the number of fresh poached elephants than anywhere else in Africa,” Chase said…

Like this:

Gayle King on CBS morning show – your world in 90 seconds – apparently knows better than white people what these so-called white people think.

A focus group on race comprised of mostly blacks was asked a question: If a black couple goes into an empty restaurant and the host seats them at the back of the restaurant – presumably near the restrooms and kitchen – what does the black couple think? Blacks responded with indignation. The answer was of course they’d be offended. The restaurant is empty, why seat us here?

Now the next question was the same, except it’s a white couple in an empty restaurant seated by the host in the back presumably near the restrooms and kitchen. What do the white people think? The blacks jumped in not allowing any of the white people to express themselves. They answered oh, they’d think, look we’ve got the whole restaurant to ourselves. No indignation. Happy they were – the whites.

Later when the show returned to Gayle King and she summarized, she said she loved that part of the discussion – about black and white couples in the restaurant and how they perceive where they’re seated differently. Regarding the white people’s perception, that was given by black people, that they’d somehow think it was cool to be seated next to the restroom and kitchen, because they had the whole restaurant to themselves, Gale King said, “that is so true”.

No Gayle King, it is not true, and that just shows your ignorance and arrogance about what you claim to know about what white people think. They ask a question about blacks and whites and they have the blacks answer for themselves, and then answer for the whites too. The two white news anchors sitting with Gayle King: Norah O’Donnell and John Dickerson said essentially nothing.

I can guarantee you that if Norah or John were shown to the back of any empty restaurant and seated next to the restroom or kitchen they would be outraged and indignant. They would not think it was cool that they had the whole restaurant to themselves. Both white and black would have felt the same way. This did not demonstrate how blacks and whites think differently, when blacks answered for themselves plus answered for whites. All it showed was how blacks think and how blacks think whites think. And then that process was copied by the three stooges on the stage after the fact of the focus group. This is not a conversation or a discussion. It is blacks talking black. The whites were tokens in the group.

Usually, people with children get seated at the back of the restaurant, but even so, many times in the past Steve and I when alone were seated there, and no we didn’t like it and yes we made an inquiry. It seems we didn’t look rich enough, or maybe they just didn’t know us or maybe it was something else. But waiters instinctively know that most people don’t like bad seats. Waiters don’t like bad seats when they dine out. Hosts are the same.

Color blindness came up and I already made my views known a long time ago about that. I pay attention to all colors, shapes and sizes. Hues, nuances, shadows, the whole thing. I am not blind to gender, race or religion. I can see a disabled or handicapped person. I can see every species of every animal, every leaf, flower, cloud, star, it’s all there. I’m an artist. I take it all in. Even though you may think you’re special because of your color or some other self-proclaimed attribute of your culture, to me we’re all on the same canvas. I’m not going to purposely see your color or appreciate the culture that you claim goes along with that color just because you want special attention based on mostly prejudicial variables. Most people don’t care about color, it’s the way people act that matters.

One black guy says, yeah, because of our color they see us coming. He failed to say that because of white people’s color, black people see them coming. It works both ways.

See me. See me? One woman on that panel saw too many psoriasis medication commercials for sure. I was shocked actually to hear that she wanted all white people to see her for her color and her culture and appreciate both. Blindly, you mean, without even knowing you first? Now that’s a discriminatory expectation. Accept me as I want you to accept me based on my color and my culture? So not based on your individuality and who you are as a person? Because right now I’m seeing racist written all over your color and your culture. If your color makes you who you are, then you’re a bigot. If your culture, that never got described by any black in this group, defines you instead of you defining it, then you’re enslaved by your own people and their ways, whatever those mysterious ways are.

So blacks don’t want to be individuals. That’s why they always say ‘we’, when referring to something they want. That’s why they refer to white people as all thinking the same way, in unison, like they do. The color and the culture are one and all those falling under those same categories are one, not millions of individuals, but one color, one race, one group, one voice.

That’s troublesome and worrisome to this individual woman with the DNA heritage of about twenty different regions of the world. That I’m just a white woman who needs a black group and black culture to tell the world what I think, makes me wonder if that whole focus exercise and the plight of black lives terrorists is to change white-minded people into black-minded people, so blacks can rule the planet as one color, one culture.

So, were there any handicapped people in the group? No people with disabilities allowed to share their views? Restaurants hire people with disabilities. Maybe not the one featured, and maybe that should be an issue. But it’s common knowledge how blacks in general feel about those with handicaps, regardless of color or culture – they see them as weak and unworthy. That black ball player who took up two handicapped parking spaces so that his expensive car wouldn’t get scratched was disrespecting all people with physical challenges.

That is what should have made the news and been the focus, but blacks didn’t care anything about that, and neither did any of the news shows. All they saw was a privileged somebody disrespecting the handicapped get tasered. He’s lucky that’s all he got for keeping his hands in his pockets when the police said to remove them, thinking he may be armed and wanting to kill a police officer. After all he disrespected those who can’t fight for themselves. Now he wants to sue for millions of dollars so it doesn’t happen to anybody else.

What about the disrespect of the handicapped? Oh that stuff doesn’t matter. So with all his millions he would do the same again, so how is he changing behavior with all his money that needs more money to keep changing nothing?

Did he change his view about handicapped people? Does he now see that he is not superior to them or anyone else, just because he’s rich and has a fancy car and can throw a ball into a hoop? Is he going to buy some handicapped people motorized wheel chairs and automobiles to make up for his prejudice against them? Physically challenged people drive, that’s why they have parking spaces designated for them.

So this black-colored guy with a black culture who hates handicapped people, would run them over if they fell in the street if he thought they were in his way. And all the white people are supposed to appreciate the color associated with that culture? Is he going to give lectures to all his black people on the worthiness of those with physical challenges?

He’s raising money for black lives terrorist groups. It was set up. He saw an opportunity and took it. He wanted to get beaten up. That’s my view.

The focus group too. It was a set up. Each time the whites got a chance to speak they did it in disparaging tones toward themselves, and in apologetic, conciliatory, surrendering ‘we have to do better’ terms, putting all the onus on themselves for whatever complaints were being lodged against all white people, by a few black people in a made for T.V. focus group in the name of all black people and their culture.

They were all coached on what to say, and when. That’s how focus groups are designed. With this one, they made the white faces and white culture (whatever that means) guilty as charged by the blacks and black culture. They were tried, convicted and publicly humiliated. They were socially engineered into surrendering to all black people.

Black lives terrorists do it again – hijack a show about restaurant etiquette to make their demands public. Hey, the guy who owns the restaurant says that where he came from in the Middle East he was never exposed to race. Only in America was he exposed to race. He must be like black people say they are – they all think with one thought and one voice. Then why are blacks so aggressive and Muslims so unhappy if this one thought one group one voice works so well? Oh you can be sure that he saw and heard of lots of prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter where he came from. Why else would he be in the USA?

The purpose of this Black Lives terrorists charade? To make Gayle King happy? She was squirming in her seat happy.

As far as the black face wanting me to see black culture when I look at it. No thanks. I know who you are by your actions – individually. And I know that you act in unison with all people of your same color and culture, when you’re talking about people who are not your color nor of your culture. The color doesn’t interest me – though I do see through it – I don’t let other people paint my pictures nor my views for me. Neither should anybody else.

When you think too much about the color of your skin, you’re not thinking enough about your character.

We’re all different breeds of the same human animal, by the way.

Most of us are mixed breeds.

It’s best not to state or even imply your superiority over any other breed within your own species or any other species, or to state your superiority over those of any species who live with physical challenges. It’s just not the proper way to think or to act.

Being proper means being considerate, it doesn’t mean accepting blindly a color or breed based on an unknown culture.

Colors aren’t destroying the planet; the cultures are doing that. Clean up your bad cultural habits and color won’t matter. You choose to make your own color stand for what you want it to stand for. Don’t blame others for not wanting to be a part of it, when violence is how it begins, how it continues and how it ends.

CBS needs to clean up their ‘cure a prejudice with another prejudice’ act and to stop feeding white people to black people on T.V. It’s barbaric.

“The Joy Of Watching Harvey Weinstein’s Perp Walk

There’s a delicious schadenfreude in seeing a powerful abuser finally held accountable.”

Definitions:

Schadenfreude: Pleasure derived from another person’s misfortune (German). Or French “love of cruelty,” 1888, from French sadisme. Or sadism (English).

Perp: Perpetrator of a crime.

Q. What kind of writer pairs the word ‘delicious’ with sex offender?

A. A pervert.

It’s inappropriate to eroticize or romanticize the slaughter or the cooking of animals, most recently done by Turkish chef Nusret Gökçe nicknamed Salt Bae – precisely because so much pain and suffering is inflicted during the commission of the murder of these animals.

It is equally inappropriate for writers to eroticize criminal behavior. To connect a sex offender with food or a highly exquisite experience is offending to all senses except perhaps the perverted among us – precisely because so much pain is inflicted during the commission of those crimes. Harming others by denying them their freedom to choose their own fate is neither delicious nor exquisite, whether you’re the accused, the accuser, a witness or a commentator after the fact.

HuffPost statement: “We, the people of the internet, were engaging in a collective act of schadenfreude, and it was delicious.”

HWH response: I don’t know who “we the people of the internet” refers to, but this internet user does not find any joy, perverse or otherwise, in any action surrounding the accusers of crimes or the apprehension and arrest of those accused. It might be better to work at changing the rotted parts of a culture, rather than contributing to the rot. That starts with the communicators of the world.

“Engaging in a collective act”? “The Joy Of Watching”? A writer need not match the perversity of the crime with perverse analogies. It doesn’t work. It’s cheap, irresponsible commentary. Maybe changing the rotted parts of writing culture should also be a priority. These victims don’t need to know how much pleasure ‘you the people of the internet’ derived from their hurtful experiences.

The method by which the two non-Hispanic white women obtained the information on tortilla making is questionable.

“I picked the brains of every tortilla lady there in the worst broken Spanish ever, and they showed me a little of what they did,” Connelly told the Willamette Week. “They told us the basic ingredients, and we saw them moving and stretching the dough similar to how pizza makers do before rolling it out with rolling pins.”…

HWH COMMENT: Is this real news? With all the Mexicans and South Americans in the USA illegally using everything American as their own, and they go berserk over somebody – two white people – with a food truck making tortillas?

Americans can only make American food? What is American food anyway, but a conglomerate of foreign food. You mean white people can only make and sell white people food? What is white people food? Blacks own pizza joints. Stay in your own culture is that what they’re saying? Don’t step out and experience the culture of all those other cultures that make up America? You have to leave the tortilla and barbecue rib joints to the Mexicans and blacks? Or they’ll shut you down?

Only in America.

Appropriation? Anybody can make a tortilla. Almost every Mexican restaurant in America has a burger and fries section. Is that appropriation? You stole my culture?

Let us make this clear. Nobody owns a culture. Period.

Wow. It looks like maybe I’ve got to take down from my website all recipes I developed in my animal-free kitchen that could in any way resemble a different culture other than that of a white woman. What do white women eat? This means I can’t eat the food men eat.

I grew up on all kinds of food; now that’s all out the window. Burgers, fries, steak, not even chicken; I think the blacks will claim ownership there. Burgers, fries and steak that’s it. Can’t think of anything else American. Macaroni and cheese. Nope, blacks took that too.

South America has a lot of cattle, so are they appropriating USA culture when they sell steaks?

McDonald’s is going to have to close up shop in all these foreign countries where they peddle their American food. Taco Bell has been banned in the USA on appropriation grounds, unless they hire and sell to only Mexicans.

This isn’t appropriation this is prejudice in its most devious form. Keep all cultures separate. That way somebody, usually government forces, can control each culture, then each gender, then by ages and status of handicap. Then by religion, then by political affiliation. We’re moving backwards folks.

Watch out. That discrimination train is plowing through your county with separation papers on board. Better hide your food, before you’re found out.

I wonder if the photo that accompanied this article from the Huffington Post was an actual photo of these women making tortillas. Maybe they appropriated it from somebody else.