Craddock v. Borough

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

April 22, 2015

CLINTON CRADDOCKv.DARBY BOROUGH, et. al.

ORDER

MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of April, 2015, upon consideration of the defendants' partial motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 29) and the opposition and reply thereto, for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today's date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendants' motion is GRANTED. Judgment is entered for the defendants and against the plaintiff as to the plaintiff's claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1983, 28 U.S.C. § 1985, Pennsylvania civil conspiracy law, and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's remaining claims for assault and battery against the defendants Robert Smythe and Bryan Baker are DISMISSED without prejudice.

Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.