Judge Wright said today in her decision that extensive evidence of other
women being subjected to harassment by Mr. Clinton and considerable supression
of evidence fail to present a case worthy of a jury. We respectfully but
firmly disagree. Judge Wright also ruled that Paula Jones' claim of outrage
falls short. Again, we respectfully but firmly disagree. Paula Jones raises
serious issues of civil rights abuses that must be dealt with in a court
of law -- it is the only way for her to fully and finally redress her grievances.

Judge Wright's decision today to grant President Clinton's request for
summary judgement in Jones v. Clinton is a stumbling block in Paula Jones'
search for justice. We are confident, however, that Mrs. Jones has raised
serious issues of fact that deserve to be and ultimately will be addressed
in a court of law by a jury of her peers. We will appeal this decision to
the Eighth Court of Appeals immediately and continue to confidently seek
redress for Mrs. Jones' grievances for as long as is necessary, even to
the Supreme Court of the United States.