Defence Minister Hishammuddin Hussein, who is also the country's sole captain of the Transport Ministry, has been reported in his interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corp (ABC), explaining with a view to justify why Malaysia did not scramble a fighter jet to the ill-fated MH370 has said that, "it was not deemed a hostile object and pointless if you are not going to shoot it down."

The reported interview with ABC was on Monday.

Seriously, it now confirms two critical truths.

Firstly, the Malaysian military did not act decisively on the grounds of safety. If we are to examine the minister's statement, it attests that ensuring that the nation's assets and lives are being protected by the military in times of potential disaster is not a standard.

Secondly, the statement by the minister further reveals that Malaysia's military standard operating procedure (SOP) is, a jet will only be scrambled into action for shooting down intruders.

Given this revealing admission by the defence minister who is also the deputy transport minister, and on hindsight, is it wrong to conclude the following:

One, if only the Malaysian military (air force) had recognised its role in ensuring the nation's safety, it would have scrambled its jet fighter to get to the ill fated aircraft the moment the civil aviation authorities signalled the SOS call.

Two, if only the air force had gone after the plane over our airspace, then we would have known for sure what eventually happened to MH370.

Three, the entire world then would have been saved the millions of dollars and resources that have been going to waste looking for a ping in the deep, wide, blue ocean; and even looking in all the wrong places initially.

Four, and more importantly, search and rescue teams could have been dispatched to save the lives (if there were any still) from the crashing plane in quick time.

But all these were not to be. And now we know that it was simply because the Malaysian military did not send its jet out into the sky to follow a civilian aircraft in distress.

That brings us to a globally critical question: Why? Why did the Malaysian defence not do what is the most appropriate action at a time when the civil aviation authorities sent out an SOS?

In any other nation that professes to govern by the dictates of decent democracy and best practice governance, the minister accountable for his or her inability to see that the right action is taken at the right time by the right people, would immediately resign in disgrace.

Even in employment, failure to discharge responsibilities that eventually causes undue losses and suffering will lead to immediate dismissal if there is no resignation volunteered.

But what we are seeing here in the way we govern a nation, it is the citizens who are admonished and shut up when faced with a national disaster that has far-reaching consequences in addition to loss of lives, assets and dignity.

The leaders continue with business as usual and seem quite settled with a system that gives them absolute immunity from being affected by failures or even dereliction of duties.

In the end, just like the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder, no one is now responsible for the catastrophic failure of MH370 that has placed Malaysia in an extremely vulnerable position.

One, the airlines, Malaysian Airlines – a national carrier – is being besieged by a massive arrest on its reputation and financial status.

Two, it places the entire military (the Malaysian air force) on a bad pedestal. The reputation and ability of the many seniors and leaders within the force are being tarnished – though it is no fault of their own in all probability.

And three, if the former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad's recent attestation that the plane may still be somewhere is anything to go by, it only puts our leader of defence and transport in dire circumstances.

Four, or are there far more hidden secrets that continue to keep the entire world of concerned and affected citizens in a solid wrap of known-unknowns?

It is therefore no surprise that citizens are urging Hishammuddin's resignation.

Malaysia's debt fuelled economy powered on steroids was the result of Bank Negara's policy of low interest rates and the abundant availability of credit.

To avert the economy from free falling credit expansion measures are taken to stabilize the economy. Economic growth as measured by the GDP is now a function of Government and private consumer spending financed by the credit expansion or put it simply 'debts'.

In the short run this might help mitigate the pain associated with a slowing economy such as a recession. Preventing a recession also means preventing the economy from performing its natural task on rebalancing such as getting rid of excesses accumulated along the way.

One of the side effects of excesses is the inflating of assets prices to bubble levels. As a result we have various bubbles blown in the stock market, real estate, bonds and futures market in Malaysia.

Mis-allocation of Resources

Bubbles are created by misallocation of resources because credit is not directed to the most efficient part of the economy. Take for example to prevent a downturn in our housing market, interest rates are kept low and credits are made easily available. With low down payments our local speculators are able to purchases a few houses in one go due to the low monthly mortgage payments.

It is like buying a lottery ticket where the returns are very high with a small investment. This can happen in the housing market if speculators can find greater fools to buy it from them every few months. With leverage of up to 300% in margin accounts, it will be difficult to prevent people from buying lottery tickets in the stock markets as well.

Betting on such high leverage can only go on as long as the markets keep going up. There will be bloodbath when the markets implode sooner or later. Other form of misallocation of resources or mal-investments happening around our country includes the following.

> Crony capitalism. Bankrolling cronies at the expense of other businesses in the economy. A good example will be supplying cheap electricity to IPPs (Independent Power Producers).

> Bailing out GLCs. Bailing out loss making GLCs like MAS, Proton and so on does not help improve the economy. It's like throwing money into a bottomless pit. Better channel the funds to provide credit to other industries to help improve their capacity and efficiency.

> Cost Overruns in public projects. A good example is the recent KLIA 2 project. Construction costs have ballooned from an initial RM1.7 billion to more than RM 4 billion. One way to justify cost overruns due to the rise in raw material prices, raining season and so on is by issuing VO or Variation Orders. Variation Order is one method used by companies participating in a tender exercise to quote at a very low price. Once they landed the projects then they will use Variation Orders to mark up the costs of the project and hence generate hefty profits in the end.

> Overpriced Public Sector Procurement. Recent report by the Auditor General reveals of exorbitantly over priced items supplied to our Government. Procurements of RM500 screw drivers, RM2000 car jacks and RM30,000 notebooks are common occurrence in the public sector.

> Wastages. Again the Auditor General also reveals massive wastage in the public sector. Buying things like odd sized safety shoes, under powered computers, building unusable open air public futsal courts, unsuitable or unusable defence assets and so on.

The above shows how our Government literally throws 'good money after bad' but that is just the tip of the iceberg.

Earlier attempts to bolster consumer spending to lift the economy is not a long term solution either. As a result of the easy availability of credit through channels such as personal loans and credit cards, consumers are spending recklessly on fine dining, overseas travel, luxury goods and so on.

The following graphs illustrate the composition and extent of the debts incurred by both the private and public sector in 2012.

Debt

Domestic

Foreign

Total

Public

438

18

456

Private

749

239

988

Debt

Domestic

Foreign

Total

Public

51%

2%

53%

Private

87%

28%

115%

From above we can see that our households are spending un-necessarily. More than 70% of the debts are incurred by properties and followed by vehicles purchase. This unscrupulous spending has led to many of them unable to repay their debts and thus went into bankruptcy.

The following graph shows the number of bankruptcy cases in Malaysia is on the rise since 2002 and heightened after 2008.

Repercussions of Debt Addiction

A recent study by HSBC shows that Malaysia's addiction to debt has gone to unsustainable level and being one of the highest in Asia after China.

Malaysia's credit intensity of Growth has increased to more than 2x in 2013. Credit intensity to growth measures the amount of borrowing or debt to achieve a unit of growth. Studies have shown that in normal circumstances in an efficiently managed economy a $1 debt will generate an increase of $1.60 in GDP growth. This is because due to the effects of fractional reserve banking and the multiplier effect generated from bank loans, the resultant GDP growth should be higher than money supply.

However as shown by the chart below, the credit intensity of growth in Malaysia soared from 0.7x during 2003-2007 to about 2.3x in 2013. This means that efficiency of capital utilization in Malaysia has been decreasing. To make it simple, during 2003-2007, we needed about RM0.70 to produce RM1 of GDP but in 2013 it went up to RM2.30. Thus our Government need to borrow more money to maintain the existing level of GDP growth.

There are many ways a country can increase its economic growth like increasing productivity, capital investments, enhancing efficiency through technology, production processes and so on. To achieve any meaningful level of economic growth, the amount of funds invested into the economy should produce at least an equal amount of economic growth.

In an efficient economy, this will mean that an X amount of investment should produce an X amount of growth. In layman's term a RM 1 input (debts) should produce a RM 1 output in GDP. In a debt laden economy like Malaysia, our Government has to increasingly rely on debts to enhance its economic growth.

Before we go on let me present you two graphs which are important for our analysis. Those are the GDP annual growth rate and Government Debt to GDP.

The following table is generated from the above GDP growth, Government Debt to GDP and the GDP growth rate to Government Debt.

Year

GDP Growth %

Debt/GDP %

GDP Growth/Debt %

2008

4.87

41.24

11.8

2009

-6.7

52.82

-12.6

2010

7.55

53.51

14.1

2011

5.12

54.25

9.4

2012

5.62

53.3

10.5

2013

4.65

54.8

8.4

Source: Department of Statistics Malaysia

As can be seen, the third column which is the GDP/Debt growth rate has been sliding since 2010. The negative ( -6.7%) growth rate in year 2009 was due to the effects of the Global Financial Crisis in 2008.

However economic growth did picked up in 2010 to 7.55% but at the expense of higher debt load which seen soared from 41.24% to 52.82%. This represents an increase of 28% in the Debt/GDP. This can be illustrated graphically below.

The above chart illustrates the effects of earlier mal-investments on our economy. Due to misallocation of resources much precious capital are wasted because they are redirected to inefficient sectors of the economy.

Thus there is not much economic benefit or productivity generated from those investments. As a result the GDP Growth/Debt or economic growth generated by debt has been sliding downwards since 2010 from 14.1% to 8.4%. Although our Government Debt to GDP increased to a record 54.8% which is only a tad lower than the stipulated 55%, we achieved a lower GDP growth of 4.65%. The reason for this is that we have reached a diminishing return on our debts which can be shown by the following graph.

As seen there will be a saturation point where any additional debt will not boost productivity and thus increasing the debt load will lead to lower productivity.

Another setback of depending on debts to finance economic growth is the increasing amount of future interest payments. If we use the current benchmark of 10 year bond rates which is 4.01% as our costs of funds then the interest rates due to our Government in 2013 will be (4.01% x RM456 billion) = RM18.69 billion.

Please note that our interest payment will rise this year because not only our Government Debt/GDP has risen to 54.8% last year but our GDP also rose by 4.65% last year. Below I present to you the estimated amount of interest due to our Government this year, where:

There are three consequences arises from using debts to finance economic growth.

Firstly, there is a trade off in what we called 'opportunity costs' in economics. Opportunity costs in this case refer to alternative ventures that are forgone in order to pay for the interest rates. Money used to pay interest rates instead can be diverted to build more schools, hospitals, roads, bridges or parks for that matter for the benefit of the people.

Secondly, due to the diminishing return on debts, more money will be needed to achieve the same amount of growth. To further accelerate growth obviously more debts will be incurred due to the mal-investment arises as a result. So, what is the point of diverting more money into a bottomless pit? The following chart shows this phenomena that is affecting not only Malaysia but most of Asia.

Lastly and most importantly our Government is plundering tomorrow's treasure today. As seen, our interest payments will keep rising when as long as we are addicted to debts. Put it simply, we are spending our children's wealth and leaving them paying the bills tomorrow.

What used to be the traditional Capitalistic model of economic growth where capital is generated from savings as a result surplus production has now transformed into a ‘something for nothing’ economic system where we don't need to save in order to generate capital.

Governments can now generate capital by a new technology called the 'Printing Press' where they can churn out as much money as they can. The ability to print money has led to an enormous abuse of power by our politicians as they can buy influence and power through corruption. And at the same time they can prohibit capitalism, competition and freedom which led to many monopolies in our country.

Monopolistic companies such as Tenaga Nasional and Plus are able to maintain high prices and raising prices without the need to worry about competitors. Thus, we don't need to be a rocket scientist to figure out why RM1 in debt generates less than RM1 in GDP growth is not sustainable.

It is just a matter of time when our economy will be CRASH landing. The current state of affair of our country can best be summed up by the following phrase.

When you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing; when you see that money is flowing to those who deal not in goods, but in favors; when you see that men get rich more easily by graft than by work, and your laws no longer protect you against them, but protect them against you…you may know that your society is doomed. – Ayn Rand

Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng received the same reception when he arrived at 9.43pm as the crowd chanted his name repeatedly.

Shouts of "Reformasi" accompanied by DAP, PKR and PAS flags were seen waving vigorously as PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim arrived at 9.50pm with a sling around his right arm, an injury which he sustained in a minor car accident last week.

Many jostled to snap photos of Anwar and a few reached out to touch him as he was ushered into the hall amid loud cheers from the crowd.

As opposition leader started to speak, many tried to inch their way to the area in front of the stage to hear him.

Anwar spoke fiercely and at the top of his voice, telling Penangites not to be scared of the small group of samseng (gangsters) who forced their way into the Penang legislative assembly on Wednesday.

"Umno is getting desperate and lack issues – that is why they have the samsengs. Are you sacred of the 20 Umno samsengs who entered the Dewan? Don't be scared of them!" he stormed.

"This is not '69 when the racial riots happened. This is not a battle for Umno but a battle for all Malaysians. This is not a fight only for the Malays or Chinese but for all Malaysians," he added to loud cheers from the crowd.

"Theirs is dirty politics, but we must continue to fight them. Tell the Malay samsengs that their fight is not with the Chinese alone but with all Malaysians," he added.

Where are you, Zahid?

Anwar gave an assurance that Guan Eng would take the Penang assembly intrusion seriously, saying he would stand with the DAP secretary-general to see this through. He ticked off Home Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, asking, "Where are you? Are you doing your job?

"If BN cannot ensure the safety and security of the nation or defend the unity of this country, then please leave!" he said to thunderous applause.

SEREMBAN — A senior citizen is fighting for his life in hospital after he was assaulted in the same manner a maniac attacked two elderly Catholic nuns recently in the compound of the Church of the Visitation in an apparent robbery.

Food court caretaker Hay Peng Kong, 65, who was bashed up about two weeks ago, is set to amplify the rage of the street crime-ridden state capital.

The town has been steaming with anger over police inefficiency to take control of the streets that has reportedly seen numerous cases of snatch thefts and muggings.

Food operators main prey for Seremban robbers

SEREMBAN, May 24 — Food operators, apart from the innocent walking on the streets, seem to be the main prey of desperados on a snatch theft and robbery spree here.

Three days after the attack on the nuns on May 14, Kedai Makanan & Minuman Coffee Tiam at Jalan Seng Meng Lee, close to crime-filled Jalan Yam Tuan, was a target of robbery.

Hoo Chin Yong, 58, said: "I was washing dishes when I noticed the same motorcycle passing by the area a few times. "The pillion rider alighted and tried to pull my waist-pouch but I pushed him away." Less than five minutes later, the pair came back with sticks and started terrorising those in the restaurant.