Metadata record for Reducing Disorder, Fear, and Crime in Public Housing: Evaluation of a Drug-Crime Elimination Program in Spokane, Washington, 1992-19952628
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research
ICPSR metadata records are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License .
2015-03-31Reducing Disorder, Fear, and Crime in Public Housing: Evaluation of a Drug-Crime Elimination Program in Spokane, Washington, 1992-1995262810.3886/ICPSR02628.v1McGarrell, EdmundPlease see full citation.United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice93-IJ-CX-0054
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research
2000-05-012006-03-302006-03-30 File CB2628.ALL.PDF was removed from any previous datasets and flagged as a study-level file, so that it will accompany all downloads.2005-11-042005-11-04 On 2005-03-14 new files were added to one
or more datasets. These files included additional setup files as well
as one or more of the following: SAS program, SAS transport, SPSS portable,
and Stata system files. The metadata record was revised 2005-11-04 to
reflect these additions.McGarrell, Edmund. REDUCING DISORDER, FEAR, AND CRIME IN PUBLIC HOUSING: EVALUATION OF A DRUG-CRIME ELIMINATION PROGRAM IN SPOKANE, WASHINGTON, 1992-1995. ICPSR version. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, Dept. of Criminal Justice [producer], 1997. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2000. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02628.v1community involvementcommunity policingcrime preventioncrime reductiondrug law offensesfear of crimeneighborhood characteristicsneighborhood conditionsneighborhoodsperceptionspolice responseprogram evaluationpublic housingresidentsICPSR.XVII.ENACJD.VII
Established in 1994, Project ROAR (Reclaiming Our Area
Residences) is a public housing drug-crime elimination program
sponsored by the Spokane Police Department and the Spokane Housing
Authority. This study was undertaken to examine and evaluate the
effects and outcomes of Project ROAR as it was implemented in the
Parsons' Public Housing Complex, located in downtown Spokane,
Washington. In addition, the study sought to determine to what extent
the project as implemented reflected Project ROAR as originally
conceived, and whether Project ROAR could be considered a
comprehensive community policing crime prevention program. Further,
the study attempted to determine what effects this collaborative
anti-crime program might have on: (1) residents' perceptions of the
quality of their neighborhood life, including perceptions of
neighborhood inhabitants, satisfaction with their neighborhood, fear
of crime, and neighborhood physical and social disorder, (2) objective
measures of physical and social disorder, (3) levels of neighborhood
crime, and (4) subjective perceptions of the level and quality of
policing services. To assess the implementation and short-term impacts
of Project ROAR, data were collected from various sources. First, four
waves of face-to-face interviews were conducted with Parsons' Public
Housing residents at approximately six-month intervals: April 1994,
December 1994, May 1995, and November 1995 (Part 1, Public Housing
Residents Survey Data). Information collected from interviews with the
Parsons' residents focused on their involvement with Project ROAR,
community block watches, and tenant councils. Residents commented on
whether there had been any changes in the level of police presence,
drug-related crimes, prostitution, or any other physical or social
changes in their neighborhood since the inception of Project
ROAR. Residents were asked to rate their satisfaction with the housing
complex, the neighborhood, the Spokane Police Department, the number
of police present in the neighborhood, and the level of police
service. Residents were also asked if they had been the victim of any
crimes and to rate their level of fear of crime in the complex during
the day and night, pre- and post-Project ROAR. The gender and age of
each survey participant was also recorded. The second source of data
was a city-wide survey mailed to the residents of Spokane (Part 2,
Spokane Citizens Survey Data). Information collected from the survey
includes demographics on ethnicity, gender, age, highest level of
education, present occupation, and family income. The city residents
were also asked to assess the level of police service, the number of
police present in their neighborhood, the helpfulness of neighbors,
whether they felt safe alone in their neighborhood, and overall
satisfaction with their neighborhood. Third, a block-level physical
and social disorder inventory was taken in April 1994, October 1994,
April 1994, and October 1995 (Part 3, Neighborhood Inventory
Data). The sex, age, and behavior of the first ten people observed
during the inventory period were recorded, as well as the number of
people observed loitering. Other observations made included the number
of panhandlers, prostitutes, open drug sales, and displays of public
drunkenness. The number of residential and commercial properties,
restaurants, bars, office buildings, empty lots, unboarded and boarded
abandoned buildings, potholes, barriers (walls or fences), abandoned
cars, and for-sale signs, along with the amount of graffiti on public
and private properties and the amount of litter and broken glass
observed in each neighborhood, completed the inventory data. Finally,
crime reports were collected from the Spokane Police Department's
Crime Analysis Unit (Part 4, Disaggregated Crime Data, and Part 5,
Aggregated Crime Data). These data contain monthly counts of robberies
and burglaries for the public housing neighborhood, a constructed
controlled comparison neighborhood, and the city of Spokane for the
period January 1, 1992, through December 31, 1995.
Project ROAR (Reclaiming Our Area Residences),
established in 1994, is a public housing drug-crime elimination
program sponsored by the Spokane Police Department and the Spokane
Housing Authority. The program reflected a public-private,
inter-agency collaboration that sought to empower public housing
tenants in an effort to produce a safer neighborhood. The main
purposes of Project ROAR were (1) to build upon the ideas of past and
present community-based crime prevention and reduction efforts, (2) to
provide insight into the effectiveness of such programs as they
related to the mobilization of public housing residents, and (3) to
examine the extent to which community-based crime prevention programs
could create positive changes in perceptions of safety, neighborhood
disorder, and crime rates. The Project ROAR program targeted poor
neighborhoods located in central business districts with large elderly
and transient populations that were experiencing high rates of drug
dealing and related crime and disorder problems. Key elements of the
program as originally conceived included: (1) opening a
community-oriented policing substation within the public housing area
and assigning a neighborhood resource officer to the target area, (2)
collaborative problem-solving meetings among all key stakeholders in
the targeted neighborhood, (3) the development of a neighborhood
improvement committee, (4) hiring a resident resource coordinator to
act as a liaison between the public housing residents and other
program participants, (5) coordinating crime prevention education
programs with the city's Crime Prevention Center and Block Watch, and
(6) initiating neighborhood physical improvements. The purpose of this
study was to examine and evaluate the effects and outcomes of Project
ROAR as it was implemented in the Parsons' Public Housing Complex,
located in downtown Spokane, Washington. Moreover, the study sought to
determine to what extent the project as implemented reflected Project
ROAR as originally conceived, and whether Project ROAR could be
considered a comprehensive community crime prevention
program. Further, the study sought to determine what effects a
collaborative anti-crime program might have on: (1) residents'
perceptions of the quality of their neighborhood life, including
perceptions of neighborhood inhabitants, satisfaction with their
neighborhood, fear of crime, and neighborhood physical and social
disorder, (2) objective measures of physical and social disorder, (3)
levels of neighborhood crime, and (4) subjective perceptions of the
level and quality of policing services.
To assess the implementation and short-term
impacts of Project ROAR, data were collected from four sources. First,
four waves of face-to-face interviews were conducted with a
representative sample of the Parsons' Public Housing residents
approximately at six-month intervals: April 1994, December 1994, May
1995, and November 1995 (Part 1, Public Housing Residents Survey
Data). The interviews generally touched upon perceptions of the
quality of neighborhood life and the level and quality of police
services. The second source of data was a city-wide mail survey on
many of the same items included in the Parsons' resident interviews
sent to residents of the city of Spokane (Part 2, Spokane Citizens
Survey Data). The intent was to conduct two such sets of interviews
and to oversample from both the Project ROAR area and the Spokane city
area, in an effort to gain a sufficient number of respondents from
these two neighborhoods. The study did not produce sufficient numbers
by which meaningful conclusions could be drawn, despite
oversampling. The Spokane citizens' survey, however, can be used to
examine trends among city residents as a whole. Given the
differences in method of administration (face-to-face interviews
versus mail surveys), direct comparisons between the Parsons' resident
interviews and the Spokane citizens' survey should not be made. Third,
a controlled site was constructed which was similar to the project
area that surrounded the Parsons Public Housing Complex with regard to
individual and neighborhood characteristics (Part 3, Neighborhood
Inventory Data). The control site was used to develop comparisons to
the project area with respect to objective measures of social and
physical disorder. A block-level physical and social disorder
inventory was conducted in April 1994 (to gather baseline data),
October 1994, April 1995, and October 1995. The inventory was
conducted for 44 blocks that comprised the total number of blocks in
the project and comparison areas. A team of independent evaluators
walked through all of the blocks in both the project and comparison
sites during various times of the day and recorded observations of the
physical and social environment. Inter-evaluator reliability checks
were made to ensure consistency of the data collected. Each
block-level inventory began with the evaluators recording the street
name and cross streets, date, time, and the estimated
temperature. Immediately thereafter, the social environment inventory
was conducted. For exactly one minute, evaluators observed the social
activity of the block, recording the number of individuals present
outside, their gender, approximate age, and their behavior. After one
minute elapsed, the physical environment inventory
commenced. Evaluators recorded the number of guardianship items,
lighting items, and disorder items found on each block. Due to varied
block lengths, the environment inventory (per block) lasted anywhere
between five and forty minutes. Lastly, 24 months of pre-program and
post-program implementation crime data were collected from the Spokane
Police Department's Crime Analysis Unit for the period beginning
January 1, 1992, and ending December 31, 1995 (Part 4, Disaggregated
Crime Data, and Part 5, Aggregated Crime Data). The Crime Analysis
Unit routinely collected data on reported crimes for burglaries,
robberies, and sex offenses. Burglary was defined as any unauthorized
entry into a residential or commercial dwelling, and robbery was
defined as any use of force or the threat of force for purposes of
committing a theft. Data for the crimes outlined were collected for
the project area, the controlled comparison area, and the city of
Spokane.
For Part 1, Public Housing Residents Survey Data,
information collected from interviews with the Parsons' residents
focused on their involvement with Project ROAR, community block
watches, and tenant councils. Residents commented on whether there had
been any changes in the level of police presence, drug-related crimes,
prostitution, or any other physical or social changes in their
neighborhood since the inception of Project ROAR. Residents were asked
to rate their satisfaction with the housing complex, the neighborhood,
the Spokane Police Department, the number of police present in the
neighborhood, and the level of police service. Residents were also
asked if they had been the victim of any crimes and to rate their
level of fear of crime in the complex during the day and night, pre-
and post-Project ROAR. The gender and age of each survey participant
was also recorded. The second source of data was a city-wide survey
mailed to the residents of Spokane (Part 2, Spokane Citizens Survey
Data). Information collected from the survey includes demographics on
ethnicity, gender, age, highest level of education, present
occupation, and family income. The city residents were also asked to
assess the level of police service, the number of police present in
their neighborhood, the helpfulness of neighbors, whether they felt
safe alone in their neighborhood, and overall satisfaction with their
neighborhood. Third, a block-level physical and social disorder
inventory was taken in April 1994, October 1994, April 1994, and
October 1995 (Part 3, Neighborhood Inventory Data). The sex, age, and
behavior of the first ten people observed during the inventory period
were recorded, as well as the number of people observed
loitering. Other observations made included the number of panhandlers,
prostitutes, open drug sales, and displays of public drunkenness. The
number of residential and commercial properties, restaurants, bars,
office buildings, empty lots, unboarded and boarded abandoned
buildings, potholes, barriers (walls or fences), abandoned cars, and
for-sale signs, along with the amount of graffiti on public and
private properties and the amount of litter and broken glass observed
in each neighborhood, completed the inventory data. Parts 4 and 5
both contain a monthly count of selected crime data for the public
housing neighborhood, the comparison neighborhood, and the city of
Spokane for the period January 1, 1992, through December 31, 1995.
The difference between the two files is that Part 4 is disaggregated,
meaning that for each month of a particular year, the total number of
robberies, the total number of burglaries, and the total number of sex
crimes are given separately for each of the three study areas. Part 5
does not report data on sex crimes, and for each study area, the total
number of robberies and burglaries are combined and given for each
month and year.
1992-01-011995-12-31Please see geographic coverage.SpokaneUnited StatesWashingtonParts 1 and 2: Individuals. Part 3: Neighborhood
blocks. Parts 4 and 5: Crime incidents.Part 1: Residents of the Parsons' Housing Complex. Part 2:
Citizens in the city of Spokane. Part 3: A constructed controlled
comparison site and the Project ROAR neighborhood. Parts 4 and 5: The
Project ROAR neighborhood, comparison site, and city of Spokane.survey data, observational data, and aggregate data
personal interviews, self-enumerated questionnaires,
direct observation, and official records

ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of
disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major
statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to
these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:

Standardized missing values.Performed recodes and/or calculated derived variables.Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.
The user guide, codebook, and data collection
instruments are provided as a Portable Document Format (PDF) file. The
PDF file format was developed by Adobe Systems Incorporated and can be
accessed using PDF reader software, such as the Adobe Acrobat
Reader. Information on how to obtain a copy of the Acrobat Reader is
provided through the ICPSR Website on the Internet.
Unknown.
Several Likert-type scales were used in Parts 1 and 2.
Ann Arbor, Mi.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social ResearchAdditional special permissions, where applicable, are described in the restrictions
field.

Please read the terms of use below. If you agree to them, click on the "I Agree" button to proceed. If you do not agree, you can click on the "I Do Not Agree" button to return to the home page.

ICPSR adheres to the principles of the Data Seal of Approval , which, in part, require the data consumer to comply with access regulations imposed both by law and by the data repository, and to conform to codes of conduct that are generally accepted in higher education and scientific research for the exchange of knowledge and information.

These data are distributed under the following terms of use, which are governed by ICPSR. By continuing past this point to the data retrieval process, you signify your agreement to comply with the requirements stated below:

Privacy of RESEARCH SUBJECTS

Any intentional identification of a RESEARCH SUBJECT (whether an individual or an organization) or unauthorized disclosure of his or her confidential information violates the PROMISE OF CONFIDENTIALITY given to the providers of the information. Therefore, users of data agree:

To use these datasets solely for research or statistical purposes and not for investigation of specific RESEARCH SUBJECTS, except when identification is authorized in writing by ICPSR (netmail@icpsr.umich.edu )

To make no use of the identity of any RESEARCH SUBJECT discovered inadvertently, and to advise ICPSR of any such discovery (netmail@icpsr.umich.edu )

Redistribution of Data

You agree not to redistribute data or other materials without the written agreement of ICPSR, unless:

You serve as the OFFICIAL or DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE at an ICPSR MEMBER INSTITUTION and are assisting AUTHORIZED USERS with obtaining data, or

You are collaborating with other AUTHORIZED USERS to analyze the data for research or instructional purposes.

When sharing data or other materials in these approved ways, you must include all accompanying files with the data, including terms of use. More information on permission to redistribute data can be found on the ICPSR Web site.

Citing Data

You agree to reference the recommended bibliographic citation in any publication that employs resources provided by ICPSR. Authors of publications based on ICPSR data are required to send citations of their published works to ICPSR for inclusion in a database of related publications (bibliography@icpsr.umich.edu ) .

Disclaimer

You acknowledge that the original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.

Violations

If ICPSR determines that the terms of this agreement have been violated, ICPSR will act according to our policy on terms of use violations . Sanctions can include:

ICPSR may revoke the existing agreement, demand the return of the data in question, and deny all future access to ICPSR data.

The violation may be reported to the Research Integrity Officer, Institutional Review Board, or Human Subjects Review Committee of the user's institution. A range of sanctions are available to institutions including revocation of tenure and termination.

If the confidentiality of human subjects has been violated, the case may be reported to the Federal Office for Human Research Protections. This may result in an investigation of the user's institution, which can result in institution-wide sanctions including the suspension of all research grants.

A court may award the payment of damages to any individual(s)/organization(s) harmed by the breach of the agreement.

Definitions authorized user - A faculty member, staff member, or student at a member institutionICPSR - Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchmember institution - An institutional member of ICPSROfficial/Designated Representative - An individual appointed to represent a university's interests in ICPSR. This individual is also charged with providing user support to campus users. promise of confidentiality - A promise to a respondent or research participant that the information the respondent provides will not be disseminated without the permission of the respondent; that the fact that the respondent participated in the study will not be disclosed; and that disseminated information will include no linkages to the identity of the respondent. Such a promise encompasses traditional notions of both confidentiality and anonymity. Names and other identifying information regarding respondents, proxies, or other persons on whom the respondent or proxy provides information, are presumed to be confidential.research subject - A person or organization observed for purposes of research. Also called a respondent. A respondent is generally a survey respondent or informant, experimental or observational subject, focus group participant, or any other person providing information to a study or on whose behalf a proxy provides information.

In addition, the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data stipulates the following conditions:

Federal law and regulations require that research data collected by the U.S. Department of Justice or by its grantees and contractors may only be used for research or statistical purposes. The applicable laws and regulations may be found in the United States Code, 42 USC Section 3789g(a), the Code of Federal Regulations, 28 CFR 22, and 62 F.R. 35044 (June 27, 1997) (The Federal Confidentiality Order). Accordingly, any intentional identification or disclosure of a person or establishment may violate federal law as well as the assurances of confidentiality given to the providers of the information. Therefore, users of data collected by or with the support from the U.S. Department of Justice and distributed by NACJD or other ICPSR archives must agree to abide by these regulations and understand that ICPSR may report any potential violation to the U.S. Department of Justice.

AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.

The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no
responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
Public Housing Residents Survey DataSpokane Citizens Survey DataNeighborhood Inventory DataDisaggregated Crime DataAggregated Crime Data