Ain't no farkin' ballpark neither. Now look, maybe your method of waitressing differs from mine, but, you know, waiting tables, and murdering people, ain't the same farkin' ballpark, it ain't the same league, it ain't even the same farkin' sport. Look, waitressing at a Hooters don't mean shiat.

The food at Hooters is generally awful, and the place attracts loud, obnoxious men who think the waitresses are going to "give them some". I can see where a degree of pent-up frustration could form on the part of the wait staff.

I mean, granted, it's not as bad as a typical Applebee's, but still. . . .

I've never been able to find the source of the quote, but I've heard the answer described as 'because it screws up the p**** economy.' The idea, I think, is that women exert a certain amount of control over men through access to sex. This appears to be the case with many other species as well. It may be on a wide level ( http://www.policymic.com/articles/82137/women-around-the-world-are-us i ng-sex-strikes-to-create-social-change ), or it may be on a personal level (a version of 'you're sleeping on the couch tonight' ), If sex is difficult to obtain, then you can charge a high, resource-intensive price like a lifetime contract for food and shelter for yourself and your offspring. The cheaper (resource-wise) sex becomes, the more difficult it becomes for people to bargain for the high value contract (marriage) vs. a low value contract (dinner and a movie). This appears to be why sluts may be looked down on by other women- because they (sluts) devalue the currency (access to sex). This also appears to be why porn and masturbation are frequently treated in such a negative light- because they bring the transactional cost of access to sex down to near zero. Women (some) don't like this stuff because it devalues their commodity. Society (some) doesn't like this stuff because it undermines the structure of many societies.

I don't know that all of the above is true. Almost nothing is ever true; it's just a way of thinking that appears to fit the observed facts. The paragraph above might fit the observed facts and might be accurate from an economic and game-theoretic standpoint, but saying so isn't likely to get you any dates.