nmm 22 4500ICPSR28024MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR28024MiAaIMiAaI
Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979 [United States]
[electronic resource]
John W. Kingdon
2011-03-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR28024NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
ly in 1979," or "this factor was hardly ever mentioned in the interviews"). Each interview was coded by two coders, and then their judgments were combined. In addition to generic identifying information, there are two general categories of variables. One category, referred to as "global codes" in the codebook, is composed of ratings of the importance of each of several actors (e.g., mass media, president himself, interest groups, congressional staffers). The other category, referred to as "problem codes" is a coding of the problems that respondents discussed in their interviews, and is divided into health and transportation. A full description of coding procedures is contained in the data collection documentation.
Interview data are supplemented by a series of 23 case studies in health and transportation, and by some attention to other sources of data like congressional hearing records and public opinion data. In addition to various nonquantitative uses of the cases in the study, a quantitative dataset of the case studies was created. Two coders worked independently to judge each of a set of hypothesized influences in the case to be very important, somewhat important, of little importance, or not important. For example, after reading all of the materials for a given case study, a coder would rate the importance of congressional staffers as "very, somewhat, of little, or not" important. In contrast to the interviews, differences between the two coders were not resolved by a combination rule. Instead, the principal investigator and the two coders discussed and reached consensus in each instance in which there had been a disagreement. A full description of coding procedures is contained in the data collection documentation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28024.v1
federal governmenticpsrgovernment elitesicpsrhealthicpsrhealth policyicpsrpolicy makingicpsrpublic policyicpsrtransportationicpsrICPSR VI. Elites and LeadershipICPSR VI.A. Elites and Leadership, United StatesKingdon, John W.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)28024Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28024.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR28821MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR28821MiAaIMiAaI
American Mosaic Project Survey, 2003
[electronic resource]
Douglas Hartmann
,
Joseph Gerteis
,
Penny Edgell
2010-12-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR28821NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The survey is from the American Mosaic Project, a multiyear, multimethod study of the bases of solidarity and diversity in American life. The survey contains items measuring the place of diversity in visions of American society and in respondents' own lives; social and cultural boundaries between groups and dimensions of inclusion and exclusion; racial and religious identity, belonging and discrimination; opinions about sources of advancement for Whites and African Americans; opinions about immigration and assimilation; diversity in respondents' close-tie network; political identity and demographic information.
The survey also includes oversamples of African American and Hispanic respondents, allowing for comparisons across racial/ethnic categories. Demographic variables include race, age, gender, religion, level of education, United States citizenship status, partisan affiliation, and family income. See Appendix: Project Narrative for more information.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28821.v1
Hispanic or Latino Americansicpsrimmigrantsicpsrinfluenceicpsrlanguageicpsrmarriageicpsrpublic policyicpsrraceicpsrracial discriminationicpsrreligionicpsrwelfare servicesicpsrAfrican AmericansicpsrAsian Americansicpsrcrosscultural differencesicpsrcultural diversityicpsrcultural valuesicpsreducationicpsrethnic identityicpsrgovernment spendingicpsrICPSR XVII.A. Social Institutions and Behavior, Minorities and Race RelationsRCMD IX.E. LatinoRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsRCMD IX.B. AfricanHartmann, DouglasGerteis, JosephEdgell, PennyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)28821Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28821.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07607MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07607MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Series
[electronic resource] 1972, 1974, 1976
University of Michigan. Center for Political Studies
2000-03-21Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7607NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study is part of a time-series collection of national
surveys fielded continuously since 1952. The election studies are
designed to present data on Americans' social backgrounds, enduring
political predispositions, social and political values, perceptions
and evaluations of groups and candidates, opinions on questions of
public policy, and participation in political life. This collection
consists of a distinct panel across the three election waves, the
cross-section samples associated with each election study, and a vote
validation study. The panel component consists of a maximum of five
interview points for each respondent (pre- and post-1972 election,
post-1974 election, and pre- and post-1976 election) taken from the
American National Election Studies of 1972 (ICPSR 7010), 1974 (ICPSR
7355), and 1976 (ICPSR 7381). The vote validation data were gathered
in the spring and summer of 1977, through interviews with election
registration officials and from examination of voting records of the
respondents participating in these election studies. The collection
also includes filter variables that allow for the retrieval of each of
the distinct panel and cross-section samples.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07607.v3
political affiliationicpsrcandidatesicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrdomestic policyicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrforeign policyicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrinformation sourcesicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpublic approvalicpsrsocial networksicpsrsocial valuesicpsrspecial interest groupsicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrvoter expectationsicpsrvoter historyicpsrvoting behavioricpsrpolitical efficacyicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrRCMD X. Political ParticipationICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesUniversity of Michigan. Center for Political StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7607Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07607.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21500MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21500MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Studies, 2000, 2002, and 2004
[electronic resource]Full Panel Study
University of Michigan. Center for Political Studies. National Election Studies
2009-01-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR21500NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data file does not represent new content, but instead it is
the result of merging data from the 2000 NES, the 2002 NES, and the 2004 ANES
Panel Study. The 2000 ANES contains questions in areas such as values
and predispositions, media exposure, social altruism, and social networks.
Special-interest and topical content includes a sizable battery on the
Clinton legacy and a smaller retrospective battery on former President
George H.W. Bush, new social trust questions specific to neighborhood
and workplace, expanded content on civic engagement, questions related
to the debate about campaign finance reform, and the first ANES time
series appearance of measures on cognitive style. The 2002 ANES contains
questions in areas such as social trust and civic engagement.
Special-interest and topical content includes questions on the terrorist
attacks of September 11, 2001, the war on terrorism, economic inequality,
the 2000 Presidential election, recent corporate scandals, the 2001 tax
cut, and proposed elimination of the estate tax. The 2004 phase of the
panel study was given in large part to questions that capture the
likely consequences of the election contest of 2000 and the terrorist
attack of September 11th, as understood and interpreted by ordinary
Americans. This included instrumentation on participation in political
and civic life, satisfaction with democratic institutions, support for
administration policy, and views on Afghanistan, Iraq, and homeland security.
Demographic variables include sex, race, age, marital status, family income,
education level, religious preference, political party affiliation, voter participation history, and registration status.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21500.v1
candidatesicpsrcitizen participationicpsrClinton, Billicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrBuchanan, PaticpsrBush, George H.W.icpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrdomestic policyicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrforeign policyicpsrGore, Alicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical efficacyicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrreligious beliefsicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrSeptember 11 attackicpsrsocial networksicpsrsocial valuesicpsrtax cutsicpsrUnited States Senateicpsrvoter expectationsicpsrvoter historyicpsrvoting behavioricpsrtrust in governmenticpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XIV. Mass Political Behavior and AttitudesICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesICPSR XIV.A.2. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies SeriesRCMD X. Political ParticipationICPSR XIV.A. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral ProcessesUniversity of Michigan. Center for Political Studies. National Election StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21500Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21500.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08475MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1986 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08475MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Studies (ANES) Cumulative Data File, 1948-2008
[electronic resource]
American National Election Studies
2011-12-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1986ICPSR8475NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection pools common variables from each of the
biennial National Election Studies conducted since 1948. The election
studies are designed to present data on Americans' social backgrounds,
enduring political predispositions, social and political values,
perceptions and evaluations of groups and candidates, opinions on
questions of public policy, and participation in political life. The
data provided in this cumulative file include a series of demographic
variables and measures of social structure, partisanship, candidate
evaluation, retrospective and incumbent presidential evaluation,
public opinion, ideological support for the political system, mass
media usage, and equalitarianism and post-materialism. Additional
items provide measures of political activity, participation, and
involvement, and voting behavior and registration (including results
of vote validation efforts). In 2001, corrections were made to
variables VCF0902, VCF0904, and VCF0905.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08475.v14
candidatesicpsrBush Administration (1989-1993)icpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrClinton Administration (1993-2001)icpsrcongressional electionsicpsrdomestic policyicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrEisenhower Administration (1953-1961)icpsrFord Administration (1974-1977)icpsrforeign policyicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrinformation sourcesicpsrJohnson Administration (1963-1969)icpsrKennedy Administration (1961-1963)icpsrmedia useicpsrnational electionsicpsrNixon Administration (1969-1974)icpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical efficacyicpsrpolitical historyicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpresidential administrationsicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrReagan Administration (1981-1989)icpsrsocial networksicpsrsocial valuesicpsrspecial interest groupsicpsrTruman Administration (1945-1953)icpsrtrust in governmenticpsrvoter expectationsicpsrvoter historyicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesAmerican National Election StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8475Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08475.v14 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07218MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07218MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Study, 1948
[electronic resource]
Angus Campbell
,
Robert L. Kahn
1999-12-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7218NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study is part of a time-series collection of national
surveys fielded continuously since 1952. The election studies are
designed to present data on Americans' social backgrounds, enduring
political predispositions, social and political values, perceptions
and evaluations of groups and candidates, opinions on questions of
public policy, and participation in political life.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07218.v3
voting behavioricpsrdomestic policyicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrforeign policyicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrinformation sourcesicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical efficacyicpsrcandidatesicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrspecial interest groupsicpsrTruman Administration (1945-1953)icpsrtrust in governmenticpsrvoter expectationsicpsrvoter historyicpsrICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesRCMD X. Political ParticipationCampbell, AngusKahn, Robert L.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7218Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07218.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08298MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1985 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08298MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Study, 1984
[electronic resource]
Warren E. Miller
,
National Election Studies
2000-10-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1985ICPSR8298NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study is part of a time-series collection of national
surveys fielded continuously since 1952. The election studies are
designed to present data on Americans' social backgrounds, enduring
political predispositions, social and political values, perceptions
and evaluations of groups and candidates, opinions on questions of
public policy, and participation in political life. Part 1 of this
collection contains the traditional Pre- and Post-Election Survey
(ICPSR Version). Interviews were conducted in person prior to the 1984
election. In the post-election wave, half of the respondents were
randomly assigned to be reinterviewed in person, and the other half to
be reinterviewed by telephone using a shortened version of the
questionnaire. In addition to the standard core questions, new topic
areas (most of which had been piloted in 1983) included measures of
"predispositions" such as economic individualism and egalitarianism,
and group identification items. Vote validation data also are
provided. Part 2, Continuous Monitoring: January 11, 1984, Through
December 31, 1984, was designed to examine the impact of the election
campaign on voters' perceptions, beliefs, and preferences.
Respondents were questioned about their knowledge of the candidates'
stands on the issues, about their own stand on the issues, and about
their opinions and evaluations of the candidates. Interviews were
conducted by telephone throughout the year, with a total of 46
separate cross-section samples selected by a random-digit dialing
design, and an average of 76 respondents interviewed in each of the 46
sample weeks. Although the survey instrument was very much the same
from one sample week to the next, some questions were deleted and
others added during the course of the campaign, as issues became more
or less relevant. Thirteen versions of the questionnaire were
incorporated into this data file. For each telephone number selected
in the Continuous Monitoring Study administrative information is
included, such as number of calls, household composition, and final
disposition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08298.v3
public opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrReagan Administration (1981-1989)icpsrcandidatesicpsrspecial interest groupsicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrvoter expectationsicpsrvoter historyicpsrvoter preferencesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrcongressional electionsicpsrdomestic policyicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrforeign policyicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrinformation sourcesicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical efficacyicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpublic approvalicpsrICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesRCMD X. Political ParticipationMiller, Warren E.National Election StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8298Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08298.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08476MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1986 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08476MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Study
[electronic resource]1985 Pilot Study
Warren E. Miller
,
National Election Studies/Center for Political Studies
1999-11-02Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1986ICPSR8476NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study is part of a time-series collection of national
surveys fielded continuously since 1952. The election studies are
designed to present data on Americans' social backgrounds, enduring
political predispositions, social and political values, perceptions and
evaluations of groups and candidates, opinions on questions of public
policy, and participation in political life. This pilot study was
designed to test instrumentation for the 1986 and 1988 National
Election Studies. Special content areas emphasized in the pilot are:
political knowledge, group membership, identification of elderly (aged
60 and over) Blacks and women with these social groups, attitudes
toward racial issues, and opinions on traditional moral values. In
order to experiment with question wording and formats, two forms were
used in both waves.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08476.v2
public policyicpsrracial attitudesicpsrReagan Administration (1981-1989)icpsrsocial networksicpsrsocial valuesicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrvoter expectationsicpsrvoter historyicpsrvoting behavioricpsrwomenicpsrAfrican Americansicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical efficacyicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrcandidatesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrolder adultsicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrdomestic policyicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrforeign policyicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrmoralityicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrRCMD X. Political ParticipationICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesMiller, Warren E.National Election Studies/Center for Political StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8476Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08476.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08678MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1987 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08678MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Study, 1986
[electronic resource]
Warren E. Miller
,
National Election Studies
2009-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1987ICPSR8678NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study is part of a time-series collection of national surveys fielded continuously since 1952. The election studies are designed to present data on Americans' social backgrounds, enduring political predispositions, social and political values, perceptions and evaluations of groups and candidates, opinions on questions of public policy, and participation in political life. In addition to core items, new content includes questions on values, political knowledge, and attitudes on racial policy, as well as more general attitudes conceptualized as antecedent to these opinions on racial issues. The Main Data File also contains vote validation data that were expanded to include information from the appropriate election office and were attached to the records of each of the respondents in the post-election survey. The expanded data consist of the respondent's post case ID, vote validation ID, and two variables to clarify the distinction between the office of registration and the office associated with the respondent's sample address. The second data file, Bias Nonresponse Data File, contains respondent-level field administration variables. Of 3,833 lines of sample that were originally issued for the 1990 Study, 2,176 resulted in completed interviews, others were nonsample, and others were noninterviews for a variety of reasons. For each line of sample, the Bias Nonresponse Data File includes sampling data, result codes, control variables, and interviewer variables. Detailed geocode data are blanked but available under conditions of confidential access (contact the American National Election Studies at the Center for Political Studies, University of Michigan, for further details). This is a specialized file, of particular interest to those who are interested in survey nonresponse. Demographic variables include age, party affiliation, marital status, education, employment status, occupation, religious preference, and ethnicity.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08678.v5
special interest groupsicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrvoter expectationsicpsrvoter historyicpsrcandidatesicpsrsocial networksicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrdomestic policyicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrforeign policyicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrsocial valuesicpsrinformation sourcesicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical efficacyicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrracial attitudesicpsrReagan Administration (1981-1989)icpsrvoting behavioricpsrRCMD X. Political ParticipationICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesMiller, Warren E.National Election StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8678Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08678.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08713MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1987 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08713MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Study, 1988
[electronic resource]1987 Pilot Study
Warren E Miller
,
National Election Studies/Center for Political Studies
1999-11-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1987ICPSR8713NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study is part of a time-series collection of national
surveys fielded continuously since 1952. The election studies are
designed to present data on Americans' social backgrounds, enduring
political predispositions, social and political values, perceptions and
evaluations of groups and candidates, opinions on questions of public
policy, and participation in political life. This pilot was designed to
test instrumentation for the 1988 American National Election Study. The
study carries new measures of foreign policy attitudes, system support,
and morality. A significant portion of the study is devoted to
experiments in question wording and question order effects.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08713.v1
voter expectationsicpsrvoter historyicpsrvoting behavioricpsrcandidatesicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrdomestic policyicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrforeign policyicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrmoralityicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical efficacyicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrReagan Administration (1981-1989)icpsrsocial networksicpsrsocial valuesicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrRCMD X. Political ParticipationICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesMiller, Warren ENational Election Studies/Center for Political StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8713Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08713.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09196MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1989 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09196MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Study, 1988
[electronic resource] Pre- and Post-Election Survey
Warren E. Miller
,
National Election Studies
2000-02-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1989ICPSR9196NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study is part of a time-series collection of national
surveys fielded continuously since 1952. The election studies are
designed to present data on Americans' social backgrounds, enduring
political predispositions, social and political values, perceptions
and evaluations of groups and candidates, opinions on questions of
public policy, and participation in political life. In addition to the
standard or core content items, new topics include evaluations of the
presidential primary candidates, respondent's primary vote, the budget
deficit, health insurance, foreign policy, equal rights for women, the
drug problem, the Reagan presidency, recall of the 1984 presidential
vote, parental party identification, evaluation of Bush and Dukakis on
the issues of environment and crime, the death penalty, and new system
support and political efficacy items. The file also contains
post-election vote validation and election administration survey data
as well as data collected in 1991 to revalidate the 1988 respondents
in order to assess the reliability of the vote validation process.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09196.v3
voting behavioricpsrwomens rightsicpsrvoter historyicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical efficacyicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrprimariesicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrReagan Administration (1981-1989)icpsrsocial networksicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrBush, George H.W.icpsrcandidatesicpsrcapital punishmenticpsrcongressional electionsicpsrcrimeicpsrdomestic policyicpsrdrug abuseicpsrDukakis, Michaelicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrenvironmental policyicpsrfederal budget deficiticpsrforeign policyicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrvoter expectationsicpsrICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesRCMD X. Political ParticipationMiller, Warren E.National Election StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9196Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09196.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09093MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1989 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09093MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Study, 1988
[electronic resource]The Presidential Nomination Process [Super Tuesday]
Warren E. Miller
,
National Election Studies
1999-10-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1989ICPSR9093NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study is part of a time-series collection of national
surveys fielded continuously since 1952. The election studies are
designed to present data on Americans' social backgrounds, enduring
political predispositions, social and political values, perceptions
and evaluations of groups and candidates, opinions on questions of
public policy, and participation in political life. This study of the
presidential nomination process in the United States focuses on the
Super Tuesday primary elections held in 16 states on March 8,
1988. The pre-election wave for this data collection was in the field
between January 17 and March 8, 1988. Questions include candidate
recognition and evaluations, feeling thermometers and traits,
assessment of each candidate's chances of winning his/her party's
nomination and the November general election, attitudes on public
issues, vote intention and choice, and respondent's age, race,
education, occupation, labor union membership, income, and religious
affiliation. Immediately following Super Tuesday, brief reinterviews
were conducted that contained recognition and feeling thermometers on
all candidates and traits of selected candidates. A full range of
voting questions also was asked, including whether the respondent
voted, in which primary and for which candidate, whom the respondent
preferred to see each party nominate for president, and whom the
respondent most wanted to see elected as president.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09093.v2
economic conditionsicpsrforeign policyicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrprimariesicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrsocial networksicpsrsocial valuesicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrpolitical issuesicpsrvoter expectationsicpsrvoter historyicpsrvoting behavioricpsrcandidatesicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrdomestic policyicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical efficacyicpsrRCMD X. Political ParticipationICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesMiller, Warren E.National Election StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9093Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09093.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09295MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1990 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09295MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Study
[electronic resource]1989 Pilot Study
Warren E. Miller
,
National Election Studies
2003-09-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1990ICPSR9295NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study is part of a time-series collection of national
surveys fielded continuously since 1952. The election studies are
designed to present data on Americans' social backgrounds, enduring
political predispositions, social and political values, perceptions and
evaluations of groups and candidates, opinions on questions of public
policy, and participation in political life. The 1989 Pilot Study, like
its predecessors, provides an opportunity to refine existing National
Election Study measures and to develop and test new instrumentation.
These data include new measures of religious identity and the political
salience of religion, media exposure and the type of information
recalled, and individualism represented by predispositions to autonomy,
self-reliance, laissez-faire, and limited government. A significant
portion of the study is devoted to experiments contrasting different
instrumentation for issue questions. New items on gun control,
abortion, and the Alaska oil spill also are included.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09295.v2
abortionicpsrcandidatesicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrdomestic policyicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrforeign policyicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrgun controlicpsrnational electionsicpsroil spillsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical efficacyicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrReagan Administration (1981-1989)icpsrreligious beliefsicpsrsocial networksicpsrsocial valuesicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrvoter expectationsicpsrvoter historyicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.A.4.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Merged Electoral and Ecological Data, United StatesICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesRCMD X. Political ParticipationMiller, Warren E.National Election StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9295Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09295.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06896MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1997 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06896MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Study, 1996
[electronic resource]Pre- and Post-Election Survey
Steven J. Rosenstone
,
Donald R. Kinder
,
Warren E. Miller
,
National Election Studies. University of Michigan. Center for Political Studies
2005-05-23Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1997ICPSR6896NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study is part of a time-series collection of national
surveys fielded continuously since 1952, designed to present data on
Americans' social backgrounds, enduring political predispositions,
social and political values, perceptions and evaluations of groups and
candidates, opinions on questions of public policy, and participation
in political life. The 1996 National Election Study contains both pre-
and post-election components. The Pre-Election Survey includes
interviews in which approximately 77 percent of the cases are
comprised of impanelled respondents first interviewed in either
AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY, 1992: PRE- AND POST-ELECTION SURVEY
[ENHANCED WITH 1990 AND 1991 DATA] (ICPSR 6067) or in AMERICAN
NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY, 1994: POST-ELECTION SURVEY [ENHANCED WITH
1992 AND 1993 DATA] (ICPSR 6507). The other 23 percent of the
pre-election cases are a freshly drawn cross-section sample. Of the
1,714 citizens interviewed during the pre-election stage, 1,534 (89.5
percent) also participated in the Post-Election Survey (1,197 of these
were panel cases and 337 were cross-section). The content of the 1996
Election Study reflects its dual function, both as the traditional
presidential election year time-series data collection and as a panel
study. Substantive themes presented in the 1996 questionnaires
included interest in topics such as political campaigns, evaluations
of the political parties, knowledge of and evaluation of presidential
and House candidates, political participation (including turnout in
the presidential primaries and in the November general election and
other forms of electoral campaign activity), and vote choice for
president, the United States House of Representatives, and the United
States Senate, including second choice for president. Additional items
focused on perceptions of personal and national economic well-being,
positions on social welfare issues like the role of government in the
provision of jobs and a good standard of living), positions on social
issues (including abortion, women's roles, and prayer in the schools),
racial and ethnic stereotypes, opinions on affirmative action,
attitudes toward immigrants, opinions about the nation's most
important problem, political predispositions, social altruism, social
connectedness, feeling thermometers on a wide range of political
figures and political groups, affinity with various social groups, and
detailed demographic information and measures of religious affiliation
and religiosity. Previous updates added a core battery of
campaign-related items in the pre-election wave to better understand
the dynamics of congressional campaigns, several questions related to
issue importance and uncertainty both in relation to respondents and
to candidates, an eight-minute module of questions developed by a
consortium of electoral scholars from 52 polities to facilitate
comparative analysis of political attitudes and voting behavior, and a
measure of exposure to entertainment programs as an indirect measure
of exposure to campaign advertisements. Additional items from previous
updates concerned social issues, the environment, like air quality and
the safety of drinking water, and the media. The fifth version of the
data adds an auxiliary file consisting of merged data on group
membership previously found in 1996 Pre-Post releases. In addition,
the documentation for variable V961454, included in both the new
Auxiliary file and in the 1996 Pre-Post file, was incorrect. The
variable information has been corrected in the codebooks and variable
labels for the Auxiliary File but not corrected in the 1996 Pre-Post
codebook or variable labels.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06896.v5
incomeicpsrmedia coverageicpsrmembershipsicpsrdomestic policyicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrenvironmental attitudesicpsrenvironmental policyicpsrforeign policyicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrgun controlicpsrvoter historyicpsrvoting behavioricpsrmoralityicpsrnational electionsicpsrnews mediaicpsrphilanthropyicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical efficacyicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partisanshipicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrprimariesicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrracial attitudesicpsrsocial issuesicpsrsocial networksicpsrsocial valuesicpsrsocial welfareicpsrstereotypesicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrvoter expectationsicpsrcandidatesicpsrClinton Administration (1993-2001)icpsrcongressional electionsicpsrcrimeicpsrRCMD X. Political ParticipationTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesRosenstone, Steven J.Kinder, Donald R.Miller, Warren E.National Election Studies. University of Michigan. Center for Political StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6896Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06896.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03131MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2001 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03131MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Study, 2000
[electronic resource]Pre- and Post-Election Survey
Nancy Burns
,
Donald R. Kinder
,
Steven J. Rosenstone
,
Virginia Sapiro
,
National Election Studies
2008-04-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2001ICPSR3131NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
affiliation and religiosity. Several new concepts were also addressed
in the 2000 study and include measures of social trust derived from
perceptions of the trustworthiness of neighbors and coworkers. Voter
turnout was also investigated with expanded response categories to
help respondents be more accurate in determining whether they did in
fact vote in November 2000. The concept of political knowledge was
also addressed with new instructions encouraging respondents to take
their best guess when answering the political knowledge questions.
The 2000 study also incorporated a social network battery, based
entirely on the perceptions of survey respondents regarding the
characteristics of their identified discussants. Two brief but
reliable measures of cognitive style, the need for cognition and the
need to evaluate, were also included in this study. Another important
feature of the 2000 NES is the mode experiment, which supplies the
ability to compare interviews taken in person with interviews taken
over the phone. This carefully designed mode experiment, driven by
theoretical and practical interest, allows scholars to test the
consequences of survey mode on data quality and reliability. The 2000
study incorporates numerous experiments that examine the effects of
mode: 7-point scales and branching, response order, "don't know"
filters, and social desirability. Demographic variables include
gender, race, employment status, and length of residency in the
community.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03131.v3
candidatesicpsrClinton Administration (1993-2001)icpsrcongressional electionsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrdomestic policyicpsrforeign policyicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrimmigration policyicpsrmedia coverageicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical efficacyicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical knowledgeicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partisanshipicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrracial attitudesicpsrsocial issuesicpsrsocial networksicpsrsocial valuesicpsrsocial welfareicpsrtrust (psychology)icpsrtrust in governmenticpsrvoter expectationsicpsrvoter historyicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesRCMD X. Political ParticipationBurns, NancyKinder, Donald R.Rosenstone, Steven J.Sapiro, VirginiaNational Election StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3131Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03131.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03740MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03740MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Study, 2002
[electronic resource]Pre- and Post-Election Survey
Nancy Burns
,
Donald R. Kinder
,
University of Michigan. Center for Political Studies. National Election Studies
2008-07-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3740NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
hip, and length of residency in community. The Auxiliary Data File (Part 2) contains contextual variables for the 2002 National Election Study. Biographical variables for the Democratic and Republican candidates and retiring incumbents include candidate's gender, race, educational background, and committee membership. Incumbent president and party support are also included.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03740.v2
candidatesicpsrcitizen participationicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrdomestic policyicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrforeign policyicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical efficacyicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrreligious beliefsicpsrSeptember 11 attackicpsrtax cutsicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrvoter expectationsicpsrvoter historyicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesTPDRC II. Terrorism and Preparedness Survey Archive (TaPSA)FENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsRCMD X. Political ParticipationBurns, NancyKinder, Donald R.University of Michigan. Center for Political Studies. National Election StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3740Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03740.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04294MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2006 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04294MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Study, 2004
[electronic resource]Contextual File
University of Michigan. Center for Political Studies. American National Election Study
2006-04-17Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2006ICPSR4294NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study is part of the American National Election Study
(ANES), a time-series collection of national surveys fielded
continuously since 1952, designed to present data on Americans' social
backgrounds, enduring political predispositions, social and political
values, as well as their perceptions and evaluations of groups and
candidates, opinions on questions of public policy, and participation
in political life. The 2004 ANES auxiliary file of contextual data was
created to provide a core of information for analysts interested in
examining or gathering data related to the 2004 general elections in a
larger framework, i.e., candidate biographical data, past elections,
expenditures, House and Senate member records and ratings, and
district and state descriptions. The 436 records represent all United
States Congressional Districts (and, for population description, the
District of Columbia) and thus may be used with both the 2004 ANES
time-series study (AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY, 2004: TIME-SERIES
STUDY [ICPSR 4245]) and the 2004 ANES panel file (AMERICAN NATIONAL
ELECTION STUDY, 2004: PANEL FILE [ICPSR 4293]).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04294.v1
political participationicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrsocial valuesicpsrUnited States CongressicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States Senateicpsrvoter expectationsicpsrvoter historyicpsrvoting behavioricpsrcandidatesicpsrcongressional districtsicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrdemographic statisticsicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical partisanshipicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrprimariesicpsrpublic approvalicpsrTPDRC I. TerrorismRCMD X. Political ParticipationICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesUniversity of Michigan. Center for Political Studies. American National Election StudyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4294Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04294.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04293MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2006 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04293MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Study, 2004
[electronic resource]Panel Study
University of Michigan. Center for Political Studies. American National Election Study
2006-08-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2006ICPSR4293NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study is part of a time-series collection of national
surveys fielded continuously since 1952, designed to present data on
Americans' social backgrounds, enduring political predispositions,
social and political values, perceptions and evaluations of groups
and candidates, opinions on questions of public policy, and
participation in political life. The 2004 phase of the panel study
was, in large part, made up of questions that captured the likely
consequences of the election contest of 2000 and the terrorist attack
of September 11, 2001, as understood and interpreted by ordinary
Americans. This included instrumentation on participation in political
and civic life, satisfaction with democratic institutions, support for
administration policy, and views on Afghanistan, Iraq, and homeland
security.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04293.v1
political participationicpsrpolitical partisanshipicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrprimariesicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrsocial valuesicpsrvoter expectationsicpsrvoter historyicpsrvoting behavioricpsrcandidatesicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrdemographic statisticsicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesTPDRC I. TerrorismUniversity of Michigan. Center for Political Studies. American National Election StudyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4293Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04293.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09580MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1991 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09580MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Study
[electronic resource]Pooled Senate Election Study, 1988, 1990, 1992
Warren E. Miller
,
Donald R. Kinder
,
Steven J. Rosenstone
,
University of Michigan. Center for Political Studies
2005-03-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1991ICPSR9580NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection, focusing on Senate elections,
combines data from a three-part series (1988, 1990, 1992) of Senate
studies. Over the course of these three elections voters in each of
the 50 states were interviewed, and data were gathered on citizen
evaluations of all senators at three stages of their six-year election
cycles. Both survey data and contextual data for all 50 states are
included. The survey data facilitate the comparison of House of
Representatives and Senate races through the use of questions that
generally parallel those questions used in election studies since 1978
concerning respondents' interaction with and evaluation of candidates
for the House of Representatives. However, because of redistricting in
the early 1990s, the congressional districts for the 1992 respondents
could not be pre-identified. The survey instrument was, therefore,
redesigned to some degree, cutting some of the House-related content
for the 1992 survey. The 50-state survey design also allows for the
comparison of respondents' perceptions and evaluation of senators who
were up for re-election with those in the second or fourth years of
their terms. Topics covered include respondent's recall and
like/dislike of House and Senate candidates, issues discussed in the
campaigns, contact with House and Senate candidates/incumbents,
respondent's opinion of the proper roles for senators and
representatives, a limited set of issue questions,
liberal/conservative self-placement, party identification, media
exposure, and demographic information. Contextual data presented
include election returns for the Senate primary and general elections,
voting indices for the years 1983-1992, information about the Senate
campaign such as election outcome predictions, campaign pollster used,
and spending patterns, and demographic, geographic, and economic data
for the state. Also included are derived measures that reorganize the
House of Representatives and Senate variables by the party and
incumbency/challenger status of the candidate and, for Senate
variables only, by proximity to next election. Additionally, a number
of analytic variables intended to make analyses more convenient (e.g.,
Senate class number and whether the respondent voted for the
incumbent) are presented.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09580.v3
national electionsicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrdomestic policyicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrforeign policyicpsrcampaign issuesicpsrcandidatesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical efficacyicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrlegislatorsicpsrmedia coverageicpsrpublic policyicpsrsenatorial electionsicpsrsocial networksicpsrsocial valuesicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrUnited States Senateicpsrvoter expectationsicpsrvoter historyicpsrvoting behavioricpsrRCMD X. Political ParticipationTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesMiller, Warren E.Kinder, Donald R.Rosenstone, Steven J.University of Michigan. Center for Political StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9580Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09580.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22780MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22780MiAaIMiAaI
The Analysis of Budget Consolidations
[electronic resource]Concepts, Research Designs and Measurement
Georg Wenzelburger
2008-06-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR22780NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Fiscal adjustments have been examined from different perspectives in the literature. However, the conceptual approaches to the analysis of budget consolidations vary substantially. Therefore different approaches to the analysis of fiscal adjustments are discussed in a first step. It is shown that the choices regarding the underlying concepts lead to specific research designs and influence the appropriate empirical method. In a second step, the determinants of budget consolidations are examined empirically in four different research designs for 23 industrialized countries in the 1990s. The analysis shows that the results vary depending on the method applied. However, economic variables seem to play the most important role in explaining the consolidation performance.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22780.v1
budgetsicpsreconomic growthicpsreconomic indicatorsicpsreconomic modelsicpsrfiscal policyicpsrGross Domestic Producticpsrindustrial nationsicpsrindustrializationicpsrpublic policyicpsrICPSR XVIII. Replication DatasetsWenzelburger, GeorgInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22780Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22780.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09053MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09053MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/New York Times National Surveys, 1982
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
The New York Times
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR9053NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection is part of a continuing series of
surveys that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range
of other political and social issues. Respondents were asked to give
their opinions of President Ronald Reagan and his handling of the
presidency, foreign policy, and the economy, as well as their views on
the Israeli-Lebanese conflict, El Salvador, and the Equal Rights
Amendment. These national surveys were administered by telephone to
one eligible respondent per household. The data are contained in seven
files. Part 1, January 1982, includes data about the Reagan presidency
and standard CBS demographic or background variables. Part 2, March
1982, contains questions on El Salvador and the policies of the Reagan
Administration. Part 3, May 1982, contains questions on the nuclear
freeze movement. Part 4, June 1982 (Part 1), contains a small set of
background variables, and several questions about the Israeli-Lebanese
conflict and Alexander Haig's resignation as Secretary of State. Part
5, June 1982 (All), contains data about the Equal Rights Amendment and
women's movement. Part 6, September 1982, and Part 7, October 1982,
are pre-election surveys and they include a number of questions
relating to the forthcoming congressional elections, evaluation of the
Reagan Administration's policies, the political parties, the impact of
various issues on the elections, and the respondent's past voting
behavior as well as current voting intentions. Information on
demographic characteristics, such as age, sex, race, religion, income,
and education, is available for each respondent.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09053.v1
arms raceicpsrcivil rightsicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrconstitutional amendmentsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdomestic policyicpsrelectionsicpsrforeign policyicpsrinternational relationsicpsrnational economyicpsrnuclear weaponsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrReagan, Ronaldicpsrsocial servicesicpsrwomens rightsicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsThe New York TimesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9053Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09053.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08243MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08243MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/New York Times National Surveys, 1983
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
The New York Times
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8243NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These seven datasets are part of an ongoing data collection
effort in which The New York Times and CBS News are equal partners.
Each survey includes questions about President Ronald Reagan's
performance in office, especially with respect to economic and foreign
affairs. In addition, each survey provides information on respondents'
views concerning other social and political issues, as well as
respondents' personal backgrounds. The surveys were conducted in
January, April, June, September (twice), and October (twice). The
October surveys took place before and after President Reagan's speech
about Grenada on October 27, 1983. The October samples are weighted
separately, and two discrete datasets, which may be analyzed
separately or combined, are available (Parts 6 and 7). Topics covered
in Part 1, January Survey, include Reagan's handling of economic and
foreign affairs, various proposals to reduce the federal deficit,
unemployment, and Social Security. In Part 2, April Survey,
individuals responded to questions about Reagan's handling of economic
and foreign affairs, the environment, and defense policy, and were
also asked about their willingness to vote for a Black candidate,
candidates endorsed by labor unions, and candidates endorsed by
homosexual organizations. Two versions of the questionnaire were used,
to test alternative question wording. For Part 3, June Survey,
questions were asked on Reagan's presidency, possible presidential
candidates in 1984, foreign policy, economic policy, merit pay for
public school teachers, federal spending on education, and
tennis. Part 4, Plane Survey, queried respondents about the Korean
passenger plane shot down by the Soviet Union in September 1983,
including their opinions on the American response to the attack. The
questionnaire also included questions about Reagan's handling of
foreign and economic policy. Part 5, September Survey, covered
telephone service, United States troops in Lebanon, possible
presidential candidates, and President Reagan's handling of economic
and foreign policy. Two versions of the questionnaire were used, to
test alternative question wording. A question about the cease-fire
agreement in Lebanon was included in only one of those versions. Part
6, October (Prespeech) Survey, was conducted before President Reagan
gave his speech on Grenada. Respondents were asked their opinions on
having United States troops in Grenada and Lebanon, the attack on the
Marine barracks in Lebanon, and Reagan's handling of foreign
policy. Part 7, October (Postspeech) Survey, was conducted after
President Reagan's speech on Grenada and concerned the same issues
that were covered in the Prespeech Survey.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08243.v2
public schoolsicpsrSocial Securityicpsrarms raceicpsrcandidatesicpsrdebticpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdomestic policyicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreducationicpsrforeign affairsicpsrforeign policyicpsrnational debticpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrteachersicpsrunemploymenticpsrvoting behavioricpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsThe New York TimesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8243Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08243.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR00034MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR00034MiAaIMiAaI
Comparative Socio-Economic, Public Policy, and Political Data,1900-1960
[electronic resource]
Richard I. Hofferbert
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR34NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
population, the number of agricultural cooperatives in
1946, the average hectares per farm, the percentage of farms cultivated
by the owner, tenants, and sharecroppers, the number of workhorses,
cows, and oxen per 100 hectares of farmland in 1946, and the percentages
of automobiles per 1,000 population, radios per 100 homes, and cinema
seats per 1,000 population. Data are also provided on the percentage of
Communists (PCF), Socialists, Radical Socialists, Conservatives, Gaullists,
Moderates, Poujadists, Independents, Turnouts, and other political groups
and parties in elections 1946-1969. Additional variables provide
information on medical insurance, death benefits, and aid to families.
Data for Mexico provide information for all states at decennial points
from 1910 to 1960. Social and economic data are available for the entire
period, while political and public policy data are presented for the
decades beginning with 1930. Variables are provided on population size,
population density per kilogram, the percentage of illiterate population,
the percentage increase in population by decade, the percentage of
economically active population, the total per capita state revenues and
expenditures, per capita personal income, median family income, minimum
salary in city and in countryside, the poverty index in percentages,
the average number of employees per industrial firm, the average
investment per manufacturing establishment, the value of industrial and
agricultural products in pesos per capita, the average number of hectares
per farm, gasoline consumption in litres per capita, and the number of
telephones and of registered motor vehicles per 1,000 population.
Variables also provide information on the percentage of registered
voters who voted in elections.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00034.v1
agricultural landicpsragricultureicpsrautomobile ownershipicpsrbirth ratesicpsrelectionsicpsrgovernment expendituresicpsrgovernment servicesicpsrhome ownershipicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrincomeicpsrindustryicpsrinfant mortalityicpsrlabor forceicpsrliteracy rateicpsrmigrationicpsrmortality ratesicpsrnational electionsicpsroccupationsicpsrplace of birthicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrpopulation densityicpsrpovertyicpsrprovincial electionsicpsrpublic policyicpsrrural populationicpsrtaxesicpsrurban areasicpsrvotersicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR VIII.B.2. Governmental Structures, Policies, and Capabilities, Historical and Contemporary Public Policy Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesIDRC II. Economic DataIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorHofferbert, Richard I.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00034.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR00025MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR00025MiAaIMiAaI
Comparative Study of Community Decision-Making
[electronic resource]
Terry N. Clark
2008-03-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR25NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study contains data for 51 communities with
populations of 50,000-750,000 in 22 states of the United States
on the characteristics of community leadership, decision-making,
and patterns of influence, as well as political, economic, and
demographic composition of the communities and per capita
expenditures for various common community functions. Information
regarding general political and public policy issues, specific
municipal problems, and their solutions was obtained from
interviews with eight prominent individuals in each city,
such as the Chamber of Commerce president, a labor leader,
a leading newspaper editor or publisher, the chairmen of the
Democratic and Republican parties, the president of the largest
bank, and the mayor. Data are also provided on the characteristics
of the cities, including composite indexes created from the
interview data as well as data from other sources. The study is
composed of three files: a Merged Aggregate and Individual file
(Part 1), an Aggregate file (Part 2), and an Individual file (Part 3).
The Merged Aggregate and Individual file (Part 1) contains
the responses of the individuals interviewed and information on
the characteristics of each respondent's city from other sources.
Items include education, health, culture, welfare, and total
expenditures of the city. The Aggregate file (Part 2) contains
information on the population characteristics of each city, as well
as information on the structure, income, and expenditures of the city
government. Demographic indices describe age and income distribution
of the population, racial composition, level of educational attainment,
and the size, income and occupational distribution of the labor force.
The Individual file (Part 3) provides information received from
respondents on decision-making pertaining to issues of urban
renewal, mayoral elections, air pollution control, race relations,
health, education, industrial and economic development, and
anti-poverty programs.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00025.v1
citiesicpsrcommunitiesicpsrcommunity decision makingicpsrcommunity elitesicpsrcommunity leadersicpsrcommunity participationicpsrleadershipicpsrlocal politicsicpsrmunicipalitiesicpsrpolitical influenceicpsrpublic policyicpsrRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsICPSR II.A.1. Community and Urban Studies, Studies of Local Politics, United StatesClark, Terry N.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00025.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07512MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07512MiAaIMiAaI
Daily Operation of the United States Senate, 1975
[electronic resource]
Commission on the Operation of the Senate
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7512NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains descriptions of legislative
activity in the United States Senate during the First Session of the
Ninety-fourth Congress (1975). The four data files were obtained from
the Government Division of the Congressional Research Service of the
Library of Congress. Part 1 contains information on bills and
resolutions considered, including the type of measure, the date
and number of subcommittee hearings about it, and the actions taken on
it. Part 2 describes committee activities, including detailed
information about every committee meeting held, e.g., dates and times,
open or closed, purpose(s) of meeting, subject area covered, and
number and type of witnesses appearing before each. Part 3 contains
information about the Senate floor sessions, including times of
convening and adjourning and number of record and quorum votes
taken. Part 4 contains records of the committee and subcommittee
assignments of all Senators and the factors influencing those
assignments, e.g., each Senator's Senate leadership position, state
seniority, Senate seniority in years, party affiliation, party
seniority in years, state population in the thousands, prior
occupation, and former public office held.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07512.v2
decision makingicpsrlegislative bodiesicpsrlegislative issuesicpsrlegislative processicpsrlegislatorsicpsrnational politicsicpsrpublic policyicpsrroll call dataicpsrUnited States CongressicpsrUnited States SenateicpsrICPSR XIII.B. Legislative and Deliberative Bodies, Studies of Decision-Making in Deliberative BodiesCommission on the Operation of the SenateInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7512Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07512.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07906MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07906MiAaIMiAaI
Detroit Area Study, 1976
[electronic resource] A Study of Metropolitan and Neighborhood Problems
Reynolds Farley
,
Howard Schuman
1997-12-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7906NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This survey was concerned with respondents' opinions of
their neighborhoods, public policy issues, and racial issues. Housing
discrimination, Black/White racial attitudes, and busing to achieve
school integration were among the issues surveyed. Information was also
collected on respondents' employment status and reasons for moving from
or staying in their neighborhoods.
More information about the Detroit Area Studies Project is available on this Web site.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07906.v1
Black White relationsicpsrlocal governmenticpsrlocal politicsicpsrminority affairsicpsrneighborhoodsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrracial attitudesicpsrcitiesicpsrresidential segregationicpsrschool busingicpsrschool desegregationicpsrsocial issuesicpsrcommunity decision makingicpsreconomic behavioricpsremploymenticpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily lifeicpsrhousingicpsrhousing discriminationicpsrICPSR II.B. Community and Urban Studies, Detroit Area StudiesRCMD XII. Public OpinionFarley, ReynoldsSchuman, HowardInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7906Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07906.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR00066MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR00066MiAaIMiAaI
Diffusion of Public Policy Innovation Among the American States
[electronic resource]
Jack L. Walker
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR66NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study contains data on the diffusion of innovative
legislation and public programs among the 48 continental states of the
United States during the 19th and 20th centuries. Information is
provided for the year in which each state initiated each of 85
innovative programs and for the date when the state became a
territory. Variables provide information on the programs enacted and
on the innovative score, which was calculated for each state on each
issue. Based on the number of years that elapsed between the first and
the last legislative enactment of a program, each state received a
score corresponding to the percentage of time that elapsed between the
first adoption of the program and the state's own acceptance of the
program.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00066.v1
legislative processicpsrmodernizationicpsrnineteenth centuryicpsrpolicy analysisicpsrpolicy makingicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrpublic policyicpsrstate governmenticpsrstate politicsicpsrstates (USA)icpsrtwentieth centuryicpsrinnovationicpsrinnovation diffusionicpsrlegislationicpsrICPSR VIII.B.1. Governmental Structures, Policies, and Capabilities, Historical and Contemporary Public Policy Indicators, United StatesWalker, Jack L.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)66Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00066.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09519MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1992 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09519MiAaIMiAaI
Euro-Barometer 32
[electronic resource]The Single European Market, Drugs, Alcohol, and Cancer, November 1989
Karlheinz Reif
,
Anna Melich
1996-12-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1992ICPSR9519NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This round of Euro-Barometer surveys had for its major focus
issues involving drugs, alcohol, cancer, and the single European
market. Respondents were asked to consider the influence of the
environment, the anticipated effects of the Single Market of 1992, and
the repercussions of an aging population on public health. Moreover,
respondents were asked to identify and prioritize the most serious
health problems facing the European Community, and also to evaluate the
various efforts being made to combat these problems. Health topics
addressed included drugs and drug addiction, cancer, smoking,
alcoholism, AIDS, cardiovascular disease, education, diet, and
vaccinations. Other major questions involved additional effects of the
Single European Market of 1992, and whether certain issues of public
policy should be decided by national governments or jointly within the
European Community. Also, the survey gauged respondents' perceptions of
the European Parliament and the Commission of the European Communities,
along with categorizing opinions on the Soviet Union and President
Gorbachev, the United States and President Bush, the role and relevance
of NATO, U.S. military presence in Western Europe, and the possibility
of economic cooperation with Poland and Hungary. Respondents were also
asked to give examples of why they felt the United Nations was doing
either a good or a poor job in solving the problems it had to face, to
name various agencies and institutions that were part of the United
Nations, and to identify the Secretary General of the United Nations.
Respondents were queried regarding their source of information and
education on the United Nations, and were asked to indicate their level
of interest in receiving more information on pertinent United Nations
issues. As in previous Euro-Barometers, questions on political party
preference asked respondents which party they felt the closest to, how
they voted in their country's last general election, how they would
vote if a general election were held tomorrow, and, if not sure, which
party they would be most inclined to vote for. Respondents were also
asked to comment on the ideal number of children a family should have,
factors influencing the number of children parents decide to have, the
role of the family in society, and what government can do to improve
life for families. Other items included life satisfaction, use of and
attitudes toward dairy products, interest in politics, priority of
national goals, political party membership, and union membership.
Additional information was gathered on family income, number of people
residing in the home, size of locality, region of residence, occupation
of the head of household, and the respondent's age, sex, occupation,
education, religion, religiosity, subjective social class standing,
socio-professional status, and left-right political self-placement.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09519.v2
drug dependenceicpsraging populationicpsreconomic integrationicpsrEuropean ParliamenticpsrEuropean unificationicpsrEuropean Unionicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth problemsicpsrinternational relationsicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrparental attitudesicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrAIDSicpsrpolitical influenceicpsrpublic healthicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsmokingicpsrsocial changeicpsrUnited Nationsicpsrvaccinesicpsrvoting behavioricpsralcoholismicpsrattitudesicpsrcancericpsrcardiovascular diseaseicpsrdieticpsrdisease preventionicpsrIDRC V. Health DataNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemICPSR XIV.C.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Attitudes Toward Regional Integration, EuropeIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataReif, KarlheinzMelich, AnnaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9519Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09519.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09576MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09576MiAaIMiAaI
Euro-Barometer 34.0
[electronic resource]Perceptions of the European Community, and Employment Patterns and Child Rearing, October-November 1990
Karlheinz Reif
,
Anna Melich
2001-03-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR9576NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
how they would vote if a
general election were held tomorrow. Additional information was
gathered on family income, number of people residing in the home, size
of locality, home ownership, trade union membership, region of
residence, occupation of the head of household, and the respondent's
age, sex, education, religion, religiosity, subjective social class
standing, socio-professional status, and left-right political
self-placement.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09576.v2
public opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsocial changeicpsrsocial problemsicpsrvoter preferenceicpsryouthsicpsrattitudesicpsrchild rearingicpsrcultural perceptionsicpsrdomestic responsibilitiesicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreconomic integrationicpsremploymenticpsrEuropean unificationicpsrEuropean Unionicpsrfamily work relationshipicpsrforeign languagesicpsrforeign policyicpsrjob historyicpsrlanguage studyicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrparental attitudesicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical influenceicpsrIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorTPDRC I. TerrorismIDRC II. Economic DataIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataICPSR XIV.C.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Attitudes Toward Regional Integration, EuropeReif, KarlheinzMelich, AnnaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9576Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09576.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09698MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1994 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09698MiAaIMiAaI
Eurobarometer 35.1
[electronic resource] Public Transportation and Biotechnology, March-April 1991
Karlheinz Reif
,
Anna Melich
2002-08-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1994ICPSR9698NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This round of Eurobarometer surveys focused on transportation and
biotechnology (genetic engineering). In addition, respondents were queried on
standard Eurobarometer measures, such as whether they attempted to persuade
others close to them to share their views on subjects they held strong opinions
about, whether they discussed political matters, what their country's goals
should be for the next ten or fifteen years, and whether their country had
benefited from being a member of the European Community (EC). With respect to
transportation issues, the survey assessed how residents of urban areas
perceived the increase in car traffic and how they felt about its consequences,
including effects on air quality and the risk of accidents. Ratings were sought
on the effectiveness of various proposals for solving traffic congestion.
Respondents were asked to indicate how well political decision-makers judged the
feelings of the public on transportation issues, and which types of transport
should be preferred in policy decisions: cars versus public transportation,
cars versus cyclists, and cars versus pedestrians. They were asked to indicate
how frequently they used various types of transportation and their reasons for
using and for not using public transportation. Biotechnology was described as
the recent efforts of scientists to change human cells, micro-organisms like
yeast, crops, and farm animals. Respondents were asked whether such science and
technology in general was likely to improve life in the next 20 years. They were
also asked for their views on the morality of applying biotechnology to animals
and the value of specific areas of research like plant and animal breeding and
the development of hardier micro-organisms for food and waste processing. A
series of questions tested respondents' objective knowledge of biotechnology,
asking them to state whether particular domains such as cancer research or the
treatment of hereditary human diseases were linked to biotechnology. In
addition, self-ratings of competency on these questions were obtained, and
respondents indicated and evaluated their sources of information on technology
and development. This survey also introduced a new set of questions on
individuals' personal experience with the Single European Market through the
purchase of goods or services from other member states of the EC. Respondents
were asked to provide objective information on the particular kinds of products
or services bought or sold, and methods of payment used. They evaluated their
satisfaction with such transactions, and assessed the levels of quality and
standards expected from each of the EC member countries with which they had
dealt. Demographic data collected on respondents include gender, age, marital
status, occupation, religion and religiosity, age at completion of education,
left-right political self-placement, political and trade union participation,
household income, number of people in household, number of children under 15 in
household, subjective membership in social class, home ownership, type of
community, size of locality, and region of residence. Actively employed
respondents were asked a series of questions (A.1 to A.34) regarding health and
safety at work. For results see EURO-BAROMETER 35A: WORKING CONDITIONS,
MARCH-APRIL 1991 [ICPSR 9696].
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09698.v1
attitudesicpsrautomobilesicpsrbiotechnologyicpsrconsumer attitudesicpsrconsumptionicpsreconomic integrationicpsrEuropean unificationicpsrEuropean Unionicpsrknowledge levelicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrpolitical influenceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrpublic transportationicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsocial changeicpsrurban problemsicpsrIDRC VIII. International OrganizationsIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorIDRC II. Economic DataICPSR XIV.C.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Attitudes Toward Regional Integration, EuropeReif, KarlheinzMelich, AnnaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9698Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09698.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06195MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1994 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06195MiAaIMiAaI
Euro-barometer 39.0
[electronic resource] European Community Policies and Family Life, March-April 1993
Karlheinz Reif
,
Anna Melich
1997-04-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1994ICPSR6195NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
felt
closest to, how they voted in their country's last general election,
and how they would vote if a general election were held the next
day. Additional information was gathered on life satisfaction, family
income, number of people residing in the home, size of locality, home
ownership, trade union membership, region of residence, occupation of
the head of household, and the respondent's age, sex, education,
religion, religiosity, subjective social class standing,
socio-professional status, languages spoken, access to and use of
media, left-right political self-placement, and opinion leadership.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06195.v4
attitudesicpsrchild careicpsrcrime policyicpsrdefense policyicpsreconomic integrationicpsrEuropean unificationicpsrEuropean Unionicpsrfamily leaveicpsrfamily lifeicpsrfamily work relationshipicpsrforeign workersicpsrgender rolesicpsrimmigrationicpsrimmigration policyicpsrknowledge (awareness)icpsrlife satisfactionicpsrMaastricht Treatyicpsrparental attitudesicpsrpolitical influenceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsocial changeicpsrvoter preferencesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrIDRC I. Conflict DataIDRC VIII. International OrganizationsICPSR XIV.C.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Attitudes Toward Regional Integration, EuropeIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsIDRC II. Economic DataReif, KarlheinzMelich, AnnaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6195Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06195.v4 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06748MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1998 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06748MiAaIMiAaI
Eurobarometer 44.2BIS Mega-Survey
[electronic resource] Policies and Practices in Building Europe and the European Union, January-March 1996
Karlheinz Reif
,
Eric Marlier
2001-05-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1998ICPSR6748NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This round of Eurobarometer surveys queried respondents on
standard Eurobarometer measures, such as how satisfied they were with
their present life, whether they attempted to persuade others close to
them to share their views on subjects they held strong opinions about,
whether they discussed political matters, what their country's goals
should be for the next ten years, and how they viewed the need for
societal change. Additional questions focused on the respondents'
knowledge of and opinions on the European Union (EU), including how
well-informed they felt about the EU, what sources of information
about the EU they used, whether their country had benefited from being
an EU member, and the extent of their personal interest in EU
matters. Another major focus of the surveys was expectations and fears
regarding the EU. Respondents were asked whether they feared economic
crisis, loss of power for smaller member states, increased crime, more
foreign workers, language acculturation, richer member countries
paying for less rich countries, slower decisions due to bureaucracy,
disappearance of small and midsized farms, businesses, and fisheries,
loss of social benefits, transfer of jobs, massive imports, more
taxes, decisions being imposed by the bigger member countries, and
loss of national identity. Respondents were also asked to evaluate the
likelihood of such situations occurring. Expectations of the EU were
assessed through questions concerning whether areas such as defense,
employment, culture, environment, consumerism, agriculture and
fishing, immigration, border control, transportation, importation,
social justice, equality, law, crime, and research should be
considered key priorities for the EU. Opinions were sought on the
necessity of various policies to further EU progress, which groups of
people (such as students, retirees, the unemployed, large companies,
farmers) were in favor of the EU, and which countries and groups
benefited most from the EU. Respondents also provided information as
to which areas of policy they believed should be decided by the EU and
which decided by their national governments. With respect to further
progress in building Europe, respondents not only described their
reactions to this concept but also indicated whether they thought it
was necessary to implement a single internal market, a common
agricultural policy, a European social policy, a European environment
policy, one European foreign policy, one army, a European currency,
one tax system, an elected European government, and European
citizenship in addition to national citizenship. Demographic and other
background information was elicited on the number of people residing
in the home, household income, and region of residence, as well as the
respondent's age, sex, marital status, occupation, and left-right
political self-placement.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06748.v2
defense policyicpsreconomic integrationicpsrEuropean unificationicpsrEuropean Unionicpsrexpectationsicpsrforeign policyicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrnational interestsicpsrnational securityicpsrpolitical influenceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsocial changeicpsrtradeicpsrattitudesicpsrIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorICPSR XIV.C.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Attitudes Toward Regional Integration, EuropeIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC II. Economic DataIDRC I. Conflict DataIDRC VIII. International OrganizationsReif, KarlheinzMarlier, EricInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6748Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06748.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02830MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02830MiAaIMiAaI
Eurobarometer 50.0
[electronic resource] European Parliament and Radioactive Waste, October-November 1998
Anna Melich
2004-07-26Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2830NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This round of Eurobarometer surveys queried respondents on
standard Eurobarometer measures such as public awareness of and
attitudes toward the European Union (EU), and also focused on the
European Parliament and radioactive waste. Respondents were asked to
rate the importance of the role of the European Parliament in the
European Union and to indicate whether they voted in the June 1994
European Parliament elections and if they intended to vote in the June
1999 European Parliament elections. They were also queried about which
policy areas, e.g., the environment, currency, employment, education,
and immigration, the European Parliament should pay particular
attention to in order to protect their personal interests. Another
topic in the survey covered radioactive waste. Respondents were asked
for their opinions on which European nation produced the greatest
amount of radioactive waste and how worried they were about the
radioactive waste problem. They also answered questions regarding
underground projects for waste storage and indicated whether they were
in favor of storing radioactive waste from another European Union
country. Other questions on radioactive waste focused on waste
management, waste processing, and safety issues. Demographic and other
background information includes respondents' age, sex, marital status,
and left-right political self-placement, as well as household income,
number of people residing in the home, occupation, religion, and
region of residence.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02830.v1
attitudesicpsreconomic integrationicpsrenvironmental hazardsicpsrEuropean unificationicpsrEuropean Unionicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrnuclear reactor safetyicpsrparliamentary electionsicpsrpolitical influenceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrquality of lifeicpsrradioactive waste disposalicpsrradioactive wastesicpsrsocial changeicpsrwaste processingicpsrwaste storageicpsrIDRC VIII. International OrganizationsIDRC II. Economic DataIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorIDRC IV. Environmental DataICPSR XIV.C.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Attitudes Toward Regional Integration, EuropeIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataMelich, AnnaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2830Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02830.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03341MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2002 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03341MiAaIMiAaI
Eurobarometer 55.2
[electronic resource]Science and Technology, Agriculture, the Euro, and Internet Access, May-June 2001
Thomas Christensen
2010-06-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2002ICPSR3341NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
ich they expected the Internet to change their daily lives. Demographic data on respondents includes nationality, political affiliation, marital status, education, gender, age, occupation, and income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03341.v3
agricultureicpsrInterneticpsrmedia coverageicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrscienceicpsrscience educationicpsrscientific researchicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial changeicpsrsocial issuesicpsrattitudesicpsrtechnologyicpsrbiotechnologyicpsrcomputer useicpsrcultural attitudesicpsreconomic integrationicpsreuroicpsrEuropean unificationicpsrEuropean UnionicpsrIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsIDRC II. Economic DataIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC VIII. International OrganizationsICPSR XIV.C.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Attitudes Toward Regional Integration, EuropeChristensen, ThomasInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3341Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03341.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03992MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2006 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03992MiAaIMiAaI
Eurobarometer 60.2
[electronic resource]Employment and Social Policies, Financial Services, Harmful Internet Content, and Product Safety, November-December 2003
Antonis Papacostas
2010-06-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2006ICPSR3992NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This round of Eurobarometer surveys diverged from the
standard Eurobarometer measures and queried respondents on their
opinions regarding employment and social policies of the European
Union (EU), financial services and practices, illegal and harmful
Internet content, and product safety instructions. The first topic
focused on the respondents' knowledge of and opinions about the EU in
the areas of employment and social policies, including current and
future sources of information about the EU in these areas. Respondents
were asked questions concerning their awareness of rules and
guidelines set by the EU pertaining to employment. They were also
questioned as to whether the EU has a positive or negative image with
regard to employment and social policies. Another topic covered was
financial services. Respondents were asked about their top financial
priorities, the type of bank accounts they personally had, and if they
had a checkbook, credit card, pension, stocks, bonds, mortgage, and
loans. Respondents were also asked if they use the phone or Internet
to conduct financial transactions. A third topic was about protecting
children from illegal and harmful Internet content. Respondents
answered questions concerning Internet rules in their house, Internet
safety, and procedures for reporting harmful content. The final topic
about product safety instructions included questions about household
products, beauty products, and paints/varnishes. Demographic and other
background information provided includes respondent's age, gender,
nationality, marital status, left-right political self-placement,
occupation, age at completion of education, household income, region
of residence, and subjective size of community.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03992.v2
attitudesicpsrsocial changeicpsrcomputer useicpsremployment practicesicpsrEuropean UnionicpsrInterneticpsrpersonal financesicpsrproduct safetyicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrIDRC II. Economic DataICPSR XIV.C.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Attitudes Toward Regional Integration, EuropeIDRC VIII. International OrganizationsIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsPapacostas, AntonisInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3992Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03992.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04341MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04341MiAaIMiAaI
Eurobarometer 62.1
[electronic resource]The Future of the European Union, Vocational Training, Environment, IT at Work, and Public Services, October-November 2004
Antonis Papacostas
2010-06-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR4341NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This round of Eurobarometer surveys diverged from the
standard Eurobarometer measures and queried respondents on (1) the
European Constitution, (2) the Lisbon Agenda, (3) vocational training,
(4) attitudes toward the environment, (5) information and
communication technologies in the workplace, and (6) services of
general interest. For the first topic, respondents were asked about
their knowledge of, and attitudes and opinions towards the draft of
the European Constitution, what sources they trusted to obtain
information about the Constitution, whether they would exercise the
"citizens right of initiative" described in the draft of the
Constitution, and likelihood they would vote in a referendum to ratify
text of the European Constitution. For the second topic, the Lisbon
Agenda, the survey solicited respondents' opinions with respect to the
current and future state of the European economy, and the situation of
the respondent's nation's economy, employment, environment, social
welfare, and quality of life. In addition, respondents were also asked
to assess their personal quality of life, financial situation, and
employment status, and compare Europe's quality of life and economy
with other countries. For the third topic, the survey queried about
the respondents' experiences with vocational training such as the
extent and nature of information and communication technology training
received, sources of funding for such training, recent and future
participation in vocational training, and what sorts of training the
respondents believed would help them to advance in their careers. In
regard to the fourth topic, respondents were asked to identify
particular environmental issues that were of concern to them, and
whether policy makers' should consider the environment in making
decisions about social and economic policies, and employment. In
addition, the survey asked respondents to describe personal efforts
made in taking care of the environment, and identify the level of
government most effective in taking decisions about the environment.
The survey also asked several questions pertaining to the fifth topic,
information and communication technologies. Respondents were asked to
identify the most important technological devices in their daily (both
professional and personal) lives, to what extent they made use of
computers and the Internet, whether or not they received information
and communication technology training, and their ability to telework.
Finally, respondents were asked to identify services of general
interest (telephone, electric, water, postal, public transit)
available to them and which were most used, and provide an opinion
about the affordability of these services, and the quality of the
services received. Demographic and other background information
includes respondent's age, gender, nationality, origin of birth
(personal and parental), marital status, left-to-right political
self-placement, occupation, age when stopped full-time education,
household composition, availability of a fixed or a mobile telephone
in the household, type and size of locality, region of residence, and
language of interview (select countries).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04341.v3
attitudesicpsrcomputer useicpsrconservationicpsrconstitutionsicpsrcost of livingicpsreconomic changeicpsreconomic integrationicpsreconomic issuesicpsreconomic policyicpsremploymenticpsrenvironmenticpsrenvironmental attitudesicpsrenvironmental policiesicpsrEuropean ParliamenticpsrEuropean unificationicpsrEuropean Unionicpsrinformation technologyicpsrjob skillsicpsrjob trainingicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmunicipal servicesicpsrnational economyicpsrpensionsicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrpublic transportationicpsrpublic utilitiesicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial changeicpsrtelecommutingicpsrvocational educationicpsrICPSR XIV.C.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Attitudes Toward Regional Integration, EuropeIDRC II. Economic DataIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorIDRC IV. Environmental DataIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsPapacostas, AntonisInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4341Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04341.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04563MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2006 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04563MiAaIMiAaI
Eurobarometer 63.1
[electronic resource]Science and Technology, Social Values, and Services of General Interest, January-February 2005
Antonis Papacostas
2008-08-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2006ICPSR4563NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This round of Eurobarometer surveys diverged from the standard Eurobarometer measures and queried respondents on their opinions regarding science and technology, social values, and services of general interest. Questions concerning the first topic focused on the respondents' attitudes toward science and technology issues including what areas they were most interested, how informed respondents were in general, and recent visits to a museum of science and technology or another type of public museum. Other questions measured respondents' level of trust in science, their views on the role science and technology should have in improving the economy, the potential benefits or harmful effects of science, and the role the European Community plays in scientific research. Another topic covered was social values in relation to science and technology. Respondents were asked how often they thought about the meaning and purpose of life, about their spiritual beliefs, what kind of family they grew up in, how often they trusted other people, how satisfied they were with their lives, whether a university education is more important for a man than for a woman, and whether men make better political leaders than women. The surveys also solicited respondents' opinions with respect to developing technologies (including solar energy, biotechnology, genetic engineering, the Internet, nanotechnology), and possible applications of science and technology over the next 20 years (such as cloning monkeys or pigs for use in research into human diseases or cloning human beings so that couples can have a baby even when one partner has a genetic disease). Respondents were queried on their opinions about humanity's relationship to nature, what decisions about science and technology should be based primarily on, how important they thought science and technology would be for their society in ten years' time, and if what those who are involved in science and technology do has a positive effect on society. Finally, the topic of services of general interest (such as electricity, natural gas, fixed telephone, mobile phone, postal services, local transport, rail transport, and air transport) included questions regarding satisfaction with the provision of services, accessibility, fairness in pricing, quality of service, and customer service. Background information collected includes respondent age, gender, nationality, marital status, left-right political self-placement, occupation, age at completion of education, household composition, telephone equipment, religion, and region of residence.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04563.v2
social issuesicpsrcitizen attitudesicpsrsocial valuesicpsrtechnologyicpsreconomic issuesicpsrEuropean Economic CommunityicpsrEuropean unificationicpsrEuropean Unionicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrproductsicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrpublic utilitiesicpsrquality of lifeicpsrscienceicpsrscientific researchicpsrservice providersicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrattitudesicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrIDRC II. Economic DataIDRC VIII. International OrganizationsIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsICPSR XIV.C.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Attitudes Toward Regional Integration, EuropePapacostas, AntonisInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4563Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04563.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04564MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2006 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04564MiAaIMiAaI
Eurobarometer 63.4
[electronic resource]European Union Enlargement, the European Constitution, Economic Challenges, Innovative Products and Services, May-June 2005
Antonis Papacostas
2008-10-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2006ICPSR4564NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This round of Eurobarometer surveys queried respondents on standard Eurobarometer measures such as how satisfied they were with their present lives, whether they attempted to persuade others close to them to share their views on subjects they held strong opinions about, whether they discussed political matters, what their individual country's goals should be, and how they viewed the need for societal change. Additional questions focused on the respondents' knowledge of and opinions on the European Union (EU) including how well-informed they felt about the EU, what sources of information about the EU they used, whether their country had benefited from being an EU member, and the extent of their personal interest in EU matters. Another major focus of the surveys was European Union enlargement. Respondents were asked to give their opinions on whether the European Union should be enlarged and what countries they would be in favor of or against becoming new members. Respondents were also asked if they had heard of the European Constitution, whether they were for or against it and why, and who they trusted the most to inform them about the European Constitution. The surveys also solicited respondents' assessments of the state of both national and European economies, the employment situation, social welfare, the educational system, and the overall quality of life in their individual countries. Questions about innovative products or services asked to what extent respondents were attracted to new or improved products or services, what "innovation" meant to them, if they would be willing to replace a product or a service that they already used, with an innovative one. Finally, special questions on the language skills of respondents were asked such as their native language, which other languages they knew, and the level of their language skills. Demographic and other background information provided includes respondent's age, gender, nationality, marital status, left-right political self-placement, occupation, age at completion of education, region of residence, household composition, national provenance, religion, telephone equipment, and major consumer durables.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04564.v2
productsicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrcitizen attitudesicpsrattitudesicpsrinnovationicpsrlanguageicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrsocial issuesicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrconstitutionsicpsreconomic issuesicpsremploymenticpsrEuropean Economic CommunityicpsrEuropean unificationicpsrEuropean Unionicpsrforeign policyicpsrIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC VIII. International OrganizationsICPSR XIV.C.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Attitudes Toward Regional Integration, EuropeIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsIDRC II. Economic DataIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorPapacostas, AntonisInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4564Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04564.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04580MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2006 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04580MiAaIMiAaI
Eurobarometer 64.2
[electronic resource]The European Constitution, Globalization, Energy Resources, and Agricultural Policy, October-November 2005
Antonis Papacostas
2010-06-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2006ICPSR4580NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This round of Eurobarometer surveys queried respondents on standard Eurobarometer measures, such as how satisfied they were with their present life, whether they attempted to persuade others close to them to share their views on subjects they held strong opinions about, whether they discussed political matters, what their country's goals should be for the next 10 or 15 years, and how they viewed the need for societal change. Additional questions focused on the respondents' knowledge of and opinions on the European Union (EU), including how well-informed they felt about the EU, what sources of information about the EU they used, whether their country had benefited from being an EU member (or would benefit from being a future member), and the extent of their personal interest in EU matters. Another major focus of the surveys was to ask respondents to express their opinion regarding EU enlargement including whom they would favor to join the EU, and in particular, the possible accession of Turkey. Respondents residing in EU countries were asked to identify fears they may have regarding EU enlargement. All respondents were asked their opinion about the effects of and the EU's role in globalization. The survey also examines world politics by asking respondents about the roles of the United States and the EU, and in general how the EU would compare itself to the United States, Japan, China, and India in several areas. In addition, respondents were asked to identify two most important issues facing their country, and whether the process of decision-making about these issues should be done by their country alone, by the EU, or jointly. The survey also queried respondents about their views on (1) the EU's budget and its allocation of funds to programs, (2) the EU's role in immigration, health care and economics including trade, pensions, and employment, and (3) the EU's
development of economic, defense, and security policies, educational programs, and a constitution. Special topics included energy consumption, agricultural policy, and media use. Respondents were asked about their usage of energy, and about how the EU's citizens and government could reduce consumption and utilize alternative resources. They were also asked about EU agricultural policy and how
it may benefit farmers, consumers, the environment, and the world market. In addition, respondents were asked questions regarding the types of media they used to obtain news and information about the EU, frequency of news media use, the purpose for Internet use, and their views regarding how frequently the media talks about the EU and how the media presents the EU to citizens. Demographic and other background information includes respondent's age, gender, nationality, marital status, left-right political self-placement, occupation,
age at completion of full-time education, household composition, and use of a fixed or a mobile telephone. In addition, country-specific data include size of locality, region of residence (local codes), language of interview (select countries), household income, and a list of television channels, radio stations, and daily newspapers that respondents regularly viewed, listened to, or read during the course of a week.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04580.v3
European Economic CommunityicpsrEuropean unificationicpsrEuropean Unionicpsrforeign policyicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial issuesicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrworld politicsicpsrconstitutionsicpsreconomic issuesicpsrenergy conservationicpsragricultural policyicpsrgovernmenticpsrimmigrationicpsrinnovationicpsrinternational developmenticpsrinternational economicsicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmedia useicpsrpensionsicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrcitizen attitudesicpsrproductsicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsIDRC II. Economic DataIDRC VIII. International OrganizationsICPSR XIV.C.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Attitudes Toward Regional Integration, EuropeIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC IV. Environmental DataIDRC I. Conflict DataPapacostas, AntonisInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4580Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04580.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04590MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2006 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04590MiAaIMiAaI
Eurobarometer 64.3
[electronic resource]Foreign Languages, Biotechnology, Organized Crime, and Health Items, November-December 2005
Antonis Papacostas
2010-06-23Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2006ICPSR4590NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
ard information about consumer rights, how frequently the media talked about consumer rights, and who in the media was the source of this information. Respondents were also asked whether they had heard a particular message and to define the meaning of that message, to evaluate Poland's consumer rights in comparison to other EU countries, and to assess the effectiveness of the justice system in protecting consumer rights. In addition, respondents were queried about their knowledge of consumer rights in certain situations, which organizations they would trust to provide correct advice and information about consumer rights, and whether they would refer others to a specific organization that deals with consumer rights, Federacja Konsumentow. Demographic and other background information includes respondent's age, gender, height, and weight, nationality, origin of birth (personal and parental), religious affiliation and involvement, marital status, left-to-right political self-placement, occupation, age when stopped full-time education, household composition, use of a fixed or a mobile telephone, size of locality, region of residence, and language of interview.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04590.v3
AIDS preventionicpsrEuropean Unionicpsrexerciseicpsrforeign languagesicpsrgenetic engineeringicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrmedical careicpsrobesityicpsrpoliticsicpsrpublic opinionicpsrattitudesicpsrpublic policyicpsrquality of lifeicpsrregulationicpsrsmokingicpsrsocial valuesicpsrtechnologyicpsrbiotechnologyicpsrbreast feedingicpsrconsumer rightsicpsrcorruptionicpsrcrimeicpsrdieticpsreconomic issuesicpsrIDRC V. Health DataDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsIDRC II. Economic DataICPSR XIV.C.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Attitudes Toward Regional Integration, EuropeIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataPapacostas, AntonisInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4590Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04590.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20322MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20322MiAaIMiAaI
Eurobarometer 65.2
[electronic resource]The European Constitution, Social and Economic Quality of Life, Avian Influenza, and Energy Issues, March-May 2006
Antonis Papacostas
2010-06-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR20322NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This round of Eurobarometer surveys queried respondents on standard Eurobarometer measures, such as how satisfied they were with their present life, whether they attempted to persuade others close to them to share their views on subjects they held strong opinions about, whether they discussed political matters, and how they viewed the need for societal change. Additional questions focused on the respondents' knowledge of and opinions on the European Union (EU) including how well-informed they felt about it, what sources of information about the EU they used, whether their country had benefited from being an EU member (or would benefit from being a future member), and the extent
of their personal interest in EU matters. Another major focus of the surveys was to ask respondents to express their opinion in regard to the European Constitution, including its adoption and ratification. Respondents also were asked about EU enlargement including whom they would favor to join the EU, the political, social, and economic effects of enlargement, and initiatives for the success of further EU enlargement. In addition, respondents were asked questions about exports versus imports and migration among the EU's old and new member states, the accession of Western Balkan countries and Turkey, and financial assistance available to EU member and candidate countries. Special topics included quality of life, avian influenza, and energy issues. For the first special topic, quality of life, the survey asked respondents to evaluate the economic, social, and environmental situation among several domains, in addition to their personal financial status and quality of life, and to identify priorities for the improvement of the EU economy. For the next special topic, respondents were queried about avian influenza, its transmission, regulations preventing its spread, their behavior in consuming poultry and eggs, dissemination of health information, and public safety. For the final special topic, respondents answered questions about their usage of energy and how the EU citizens and government could reduce energy consumption and utilize alternative resources. Demographic and other background information includes age, gender, nationality, birthplace, marital status, left-right political self-placement, occupation, age at completion of full-time education, household composition, religious affiliation and involvement, and ownership of a fixed or a mobile telephone and other durable goods. In addition, country-specific data include size of locality, region of residence, language of interview (select countries), and a list of television channels, radio stations, and daily newspapers that respondents regularly viewed, listened to, or read during the course of a week.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20322.v2
agricultural policyicpsrattitudesicpsrcitizen attitudesicpsrconstitutionsicpsrconsumer behavioricpsreconomic integrationicpsreconomic issuesicpsrenergy conservationicpsrEuropean Economic CommunityicpsrEuropean unificationicpsrEuropean Unionicpsrforeign policyicpsrgovernmenticpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth policyicpsrinformation disseminationicpsrinternational economicsicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmedia useicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical influenceicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrproductsicpsrpublic healthicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrpublic safetyicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial changeicpsrsocial issuesicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsIDRC V. Health DataIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorIDRC IV. Environmental DataIDRC I. Conflict DataICPSR XIV.C.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Attitudes Toward Regional Integration, EuropeIDRC II. Economic DataIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataPapacostas, AntonisInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20322Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20322.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07511MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07511MiAaIMiAaI
Euro-barometer 6
[electronic resource]Twenty Years of the Common Market, October/November 1976
Jacques-Rene Rabier
,
Ronald Inglehart
2015-05-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7511NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This round of Euro-Barometer surveys queried respondents on
standard Euro-Barometer measures, such as how satisfied they were with
their present life, whether they attempted to persuade others close to
them to share their views on subjects they held strong opinions about,
whether they discussed political matters, what their country's goals
should be for the next ten years, and how they viewed the need for
societal change. Additional questions focused on the respondents'
knowledge of and opinions on the European Community (EC), including
how well-informed they felt about the EC, what sources of information
about the EC they used, whether their country had benefited from being
an EC member, and the extent of their personal interest in EC
matters. Another major focus of the surveys was on the achievements
and problems of the Common Market and the European Community. These
questions dealt with respondents' interest in a wide range of problems
facing the EC, including the coordination of economic and foreign
policy and the establishment of social and environmental
policies. This section was extended to probe respondents' preferences
on whether the EC or the individual countries should make the final
decisions on these issues. The interview further inquired about
perceptions of the EC's future and preferences among various policy
choices the EC would be making. Another series of questions was
directed at the election of the European Parliament, then scheduled
for spring 1978. Standard demographic questions gathered information
about the respondents' religious affiliation, education, occupation,
marital status, age, and sex, as well as the occupation of the head of
household and the composition of the household. In addition to the
survey itself, the ICPSR version of the study contains four
constructed indices. One of these indices places respondents along a
materialist/postmaterialist values continuum, two indices categorize
respondents' political ideology according to their partisan support
and their left-right leanings, and the fourth index measures the
respondents' opinion leadership in discussions with others about
politics. Euro-Barometer 6 contains data gathered from representative
samples of respondents aged 15 or older interviewed in each of the
nine nations of the EC (Germany, Great Britain, Denmark, Italy,
France, Belgium, Luxembourg, Ireland, and the Netherlands) in
October-November 1976.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07511.v2
attitudesicpsreconomic behavioricpsreconomic integrationicpsreconomic policyicpsrenvironmenticpsrenvironmental policyicpsrEuropean unificationicpsrEuropean Unionicpsrforeign policyicpsrleadershipicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical influenceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsocial changeicpsrIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorIDRC VIII. International OrganizationsICPSR XIV.C.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Attitudes Toward Regional Integration, EuropeIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC II. Economic DataRabier, Jacques-ReneInglehart, RonaldInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7511Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07511.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07853MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07853MiAaIMiAaI
Geriatric Home Care Utilization
[electronic resource]San Francisco, 1968-1975
Suzanne Day
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7853NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection reported on geriatric clients served by
San Francisco Home Health Services, Inc. (SFHHS) between
1968 and 1975. The study was designed to document and analyze the natural
history of home care service use from entry to exit, noting what types
of users were in a home care agency's program and how intensively
services were utilized. The study also identified outcome categories
useful for response to public policy questions on the effectiveness of
various service types in meeting geriatric needs. Also examined was the
relationship of home care use to nursing home entry, and to the need
for other services. In Part 1, data for 2,435 clients were gathered
from case records at SFHHS. Variables used in the analysis include
entry characteristics (e.g, age, sex, condition, living arrangement,
and contextual variables such as referral source, prior source of
care, and payment type), duration, intensity, and type of service
utilization, as well as discharge or exit status. Some of these are
calculated variables derived from each case's accumulated monthly
service records (found in their raw form in Part 2). Part 2 contains
35,729 client monthly service records, which are distributed as raw data
as received from SFHHS. Variables include billing date, pay plan, and
frequency and intensity of assistance.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07853.v1
agingicpsrlong term careicpsrmedical recordsicpsrnursing home careicpsrolder adultsicpsrpublic healthicpsrpublic policyicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsupportive servicesicpsreldercareicpsrgerontologyicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth policyicpsrhome care agenciesicpsrhome health careicpsrinstitutional careicpsrinsuranceicpsrICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesNACDA VI. Health Care Needs, Utilization, and Financing for Older AdultsDay, SuzanneInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7853Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07853.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34625MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34625MiAaIMiAaI
Global Digital Activism Data Set, 2013
[electronic resource]
Mary Joyce
,
António Rosas
,
Philip N. Howard
2014-06-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34625NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Global Digital Activism Data Set (GDADS), released February 2013 by the Digital Activism Research Project (DARP) at the University of Washington in Seattle, features coded cases of online digital activism from 151 countries and dependent territories. Several features from each case of digital activism were documented, including the year that online action commenced, the country of origin of the initiator(s), the geographic scope of their campaign, and whether the action was online only, or also featured offline activities. Researchers were interested in the number and types of software applications that were used by digital activists. Specifically, information was collected on whether software applications were used to circumvent censorship or evade government surveillance, to transfer money or resources, to aid in co-creation by a collaborative group, or for purposes of networking, mobilization, information sharing, or technical violence (destructive/disruptive hacking). The collection illustrates the overall focus of each case of digital activism by defining the cause advanced or defended by the action, the initiator's diagnosis of the problem and its perceived origin, the identification of the targeted audience that the campaign sought to mobilize, as well as the target whose actions the initiators aimed to influence. Finally, each case of digital activism was evaluated in terms of its success or failure in achieving the initiator's objectives, and whether any other positive outcomes were apparent.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34625.v2
activismicpsrblogsicpsrcivil disobedienceicpsrcommunications systemsicpsrcomputer related crimesicpsrcomputer softwareicpsrcomputer useicpsrdigital communicationsicpsrhuman rightsicpsrinformation systemsicpsrInterneticpsrnonviolent protesticpsrpoliticsicpsrprotest demonstrationsicpsrpublic policyicpsrsocial activismicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial changeicpsrsocial issuesicpsrsocial justiceicpsrsocial mediaicpsrsocial movementsicpsrsocial networksicpsrtechnologyicpsrICPSR XI.B.2. International Systems: Linkages, Relationships, and Events, International Organizations, Member ActivitiesJoyce, MaryRosas, AntónioHoward, Philip N.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34625Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34625.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07575MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07575MiAaIMiAaI
High School Seniors Cohort Study, 1965 and 1973
[electronic resource]
M. Kent Jennings
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7575NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains information gathered from
questionnaires administered to high school seniors on two separate
occasions. Part 1 contains data gathered in 1965 in order to provide
information about the social and political climate of the peer groups
and the entire senior classes of the student interviewees who were the
subjects of the STUDENT-PARENT SOCIALIZATION STUDY, 1965 (ICPSR
7286). Part 2 contains similar data gathered in 1973 to provide a
trend line and to cover slightly different topics. The schools used
were defined by the 97 included in the socialization study, in which
all members of the senior class were potential respondents. In the
cohort study, several key political measures (especially trust,
efficacy, tolerance, cosmopolitanism, salience, and partisanship) and
personal measures were developed paralleling those used in the
socialization study. Data include respondent's attitudes toward
politics, things the respondent was least proud of (e.g.,
discrimination against minorities or dirty politics in government),
concept of a good citizen, faith in government, political interest,
attitudes toward federal government, party identification, academic
courses, interest in public affairs, attitudes toward school and
students, school activities, respondent's personality, academic
background and plans, occupational plans, and family background. The
1965 and 1973 interviews differed in some respects: Part 1 included
more attention to the social studies curriculum and the social
climate, and Part 2 devoted more attention to political data and
ethnic and racial composition. Additional information about the
schools attended by the students was collected from school officials
through a school characteristics form, e.g., percentages of various
ethnic groups making up the student population, percentage of
graduating seniors entering college, and whether the school had a
formal social studies curriculum guide. These data are located at the
end of each file.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07575.v1
academic achievementicpsrpolitical behavioricpsrpolitical corruptionicpsrpolitical partisanshipicpsrpolitical socializationicpsrpublic policyicpsrsocial problemsicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial changeicpsrsocial studiesicpsradolescentsicpsrstudent attitudesicpsrtoleranceicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrcareer goalsicpsrcitizenshipicpsrhigh school studentsicpsrhigh schoolsicpsrpeer groupsicpsrpersonalityicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesJennings, M. KentInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7575Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07575.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30206MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30206MiAaIMiAaI
Incidents of Post-9/11 U.S. National Security Policies' Impact on Scientific Research and Higher Education in Diverse Geographic Locations, March 2002 to June 2005.
[electronic resource]
Albert H. Teich
,
Mark S. Frankel
2011-05-26Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR30206NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
Through this study, the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) sought to collect and disseminate information about the impacts of post-9/11 security policies on scientific research and higher education. The study resulted in the development of a searchable database that includes 92 separate incidents in which scientists and engineers, from across the United States and internationally, were affected by the implementation of those policies.
Data for this study were collected via the following methods: public literature and professional journal searches, the American Association for the Advancement of Science Web site, and announcements of the project.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30206.v1
foreign studentsicpsrhigher educationicpsrnational securityicpsrpolicy makingicpsrpublic policyicpsrscientific researchicpsrscientistsicpsrsecurity systemsicpsrSeptember 11 attackicpsrterrorist attacksicpsrICPSR VIII.B.1. Governmental Structures, Policies, and Capabilities, Historical and Contemporary Public Policy Indicators, United StatesICPSR V.A. Education, United StatesICPSR XX. Fast TrackTeich, Albert H.Frankel, Mark S.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30206Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30206.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20862MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20862MiAaIMiAaI
Latino National Survey (LNS), 2006
[electronic resource]
Luis R. Fraga
,
John A. Garcia
,
Rodney Hero
,
Michael Jones-Correa
,
Valerie Martinez-Ebers
,
Gary M. Segura
2013-06-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR20862NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Latino National Survey (LNS) contains 8,634 completed
interviews (unweighted) of self-identified Latino/Hispanic residents
of the United States. Interviewing began on November 17, 2005, and
continued through August 4, 2006. The survey instrument contained
approximately 165 distinct items ranging from demographic descriptions
to political attitudes and policy preferences, as well as a variety of
social indicators and experiences. All interviewers were bilingual,
English and Spanish. Respondents were greeted in both languages and
were immediately offered the opportunity to interview in either
language. Interviewers also provided a consent script that allowed
respondents to opt out of the survey. Demographic variables include
age, ancestry, birthplace, education level, ethnicity, marital status,
military service, number of people in the household, number of
children under the age of 18 living in the household, political party
affiliation, political ideology, religiosity, religious preference,
race, and sex.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20862.v6
cultural pluralismicpsrcultural traditionsicpsrdiscriminationicpsreducationicpsreducational opportunitiesicpsrethnic groupsicpsrethnic identityicpsrethnicityicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrgovernment servicesicpsrHispanic or Latino AmericansicpsrHispanic or Latino originsicpsrinternational relationsicpsrmedia useicpsrminoritiesicpsrpolitical behavioricpsrpolitical ideologiesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpolitical partisanshipicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrpublic schoolsicpsrraceicpsrrace relationsicpsrstate electionsicpsrcitizen participationicpsrcitizenshipicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrcultural diversityicpsrcultural identityicpsrICPSR XVII.A. Social Institutions and Behavior, Minorities and Race RelationsDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsRCMD XIII. Race and EthnicityRCMD IX.E. LatinoFraga, Luis R.Garcia, John A.Hero, RodneyJones-Correa, MichaelMartinez-Ebers, ValerieSegura, Gary M.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20862Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20862.v6 nmm 22 4500ICPSR24502MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR24502MiAaIMiAaI
Latino National Survey (LNS)--New England, 2006
[electronic resource]
Evelyn Hu-Dehart
,
Matthew Garcia
,
Cynthia Garcia Coll
,
Jose Itzigsohn
,
Marion Orr
,
Tony Affigne
,
Jorge Elorza
2015-07-17Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR24502NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Latino National Survey (LNS)--New England is the New England
extension of the LATINO NATIONAL SURVEY (LNS), 2006 (ICPSR
20862), which was conducted in 2005-2006. The Latino
National Survey (LNS)--New England contains 1,200 completed interviews
(unweighted) of self-identified Latino/Hispanic residents of the
United States. The questionnaire is the same as that used in the original LNS.
Interviewing began on November 17, 2005, and continued through August
4, 2006. The survey instrument contained approximately 165 distinct
items ranging from demographic descriptions to political attitudes and
policy preferences, as well as a variety of social indicators and
experiences. All interviewers were bilingual, English and
Spanish. Respondents were greeted in both languages and were
immediately offered the opportunity to interview in either
language. Interviewers also provided a consent script that allowed
respondents to opt out of the survey. Demographic variables include
age, ancestry, birthplace, education level, ethnicity, marital status,
military service, number of people in the household, number of
children under the age of 18 living in the household, political party
affiliation, political ideology, religiosity, religious preference,
race, and sex.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24502.v2
citizen participationicpsrcitizenshipicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrcultural diversityicpsrcultural identityicpsrcultural pluralismicpsrcultural traditionsicpsrdiscriminationicpsreducationicpsreducational opportunitiesicpsrethnic groupsicpsrethnic identityicpsrethnicityicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrgovernment servicesicpsrHispanic or Latino AmericansicpsrHispanic or Latino originsicpsrinternational relationsicpsrmedia useicpsrminoritiesicpsrpolitical behavioricpsrpolitical ideologiesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpolitical partisanshipicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrpublic schoolsicpsrraceicpsrrace relationsicpsrstate electionsicpsrDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsRCMD XIII. Race and EthnicityRCMD IX.E. LatinoICPSR XVII.A. Social Institutions and Behavior, Minorities and Race RelationsHu-Dehart, EvelynGarcia, MatthewGarcia Coll, CynthiaItzigsohn, JoseOrr, MarionAffigne, TonyElorza, JorgeInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)24502Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24502.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07012MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07012MiAaIMiAaI
Legislative Issues in the Fifty States, 1963
[electronic resource]
Wayne L. Francis
2010-03-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7012NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study of state legislative politics surveyed
legislators from all 50 states. Questions were asked about areas of
political conflict in the legislature, the determinants of conflict,
the role of various political actors, and the accumulated effect of
conflict upon policy formation. Background information was also collected.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07012.v2
governmental elitesicpsrUnited Statesicpsrlegislationicpsrlegislative issuesicpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolicy makingicpsrpolitical conflicticpsrpublic policyicpsrstate legislaturesicpsrstate politicsicpsrICPSR XIII.B. Legislative and Deliberative Bodies, Studies of Decision-Making in Deliberative BodiesFrancis, Wayne L.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7012Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07012.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02029MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1998 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02029MiAaIMiAaI
National Black Election Study, 1996
[electronic resource]
Katherine Tate
2004-11-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1998ICPSR2029NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection provides information on the attitudes
and political preferences of the Black electorate during the 1996
presidential election, and contains both pre- and post-election
components. A total of 1,216 respondents completed interviews during
the pre-election component, 854 of whom were reinterviewed for the
post-election component. Questions regarding party identification,
political interest, and preferences and choices for president were
asked. In addition, respondents were matched to their congressional
districts and asked to evaluate their House representatives. Also
included were questions regarding social and political values,
perceptions and evaluations of candidates and groups, opinions on
questions of public policy, participation in political life, race and
gender issues, economic matters, quality of life, government spending,
and religion and church politics. Demographic information on
respondents includes sex, age, education, marital status, income, and
occupation and industry.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02029.v1
voter attitudesicpsrvoter preferencesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrAfrican Americansicpsrcongressional candidatesicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrgender issuesicpsrgovernment spendingicpsrminority votersicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical interesticpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpresidential campaignsicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrquality of lifeicpsrracial attitudesicpsrreligious beliefsicpsrsocial valuesicpsrspecial interest groupsicpsrRCMD X. Political ParticipationRCMD IX.A. African AmericanRCMD XII. Public OpinionICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesTate, KatherineInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2029Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02029.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04434MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04434MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey of Economic Development Organizations, 1999
[electronic resource]
Gary P. Green
2007-09-17Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4434NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection was a part of a larger research
project designed to examine the role of public-private partnerships
and local development organizations (LDO) in rural America. Most
studies of local development policy have examined the activities of
local governments, or, in a few cases, the effects of LDOs. There has
been, however, little research on how local governments and
development organizations interact, the effects of their activities on
policies, and the outcomes of those policies on job and income
growth. The purpose of this research project was to gain a better
understanding of the organization of economic development in
nonmetropolitan areas, specifically, what factors led to policy
adoption and the creation of an LDO in a community.
In the fall of 1999, this survey was sent to the local development
organizations listed on the NATIONAL SURVEY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 1998 (ICPSR 4433) or found through a variety of
Web sites that included lists of development organizations operating
in the given community.
Each local economic development organization was surveyed on labor
unions, business incentives, and economic development activities
(small business development, business attraction, and business
retention/expansion). A series of questions were asked about the board
of directors, their primary professions/affiliations, race/ethnic
composition, gender, and how they were selected. Respondents were
also asked about their relationships with other organizations, like
private lending institutions, Chamber of Commerce, real estate or
property developers, and citizen advisory groups.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04434.v1
economic planningicpsreconomic policyicpsrfinancial supporticpsrgrantsicpsrlabor unionsicpsrlocal governmenticpsrnongovernmental organizationsicpsrnonprofit organizationsicpsrpublic policyicpsrrural developmenticpsrsmall businessesicpsrtax deductionsicpsrbusinessesicpsrcommunitiesicpsrcommunity organizationsicpsrcountiesicpsreconomic developmenticpsrICPSR IV.C. Economic Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Economic Processes and IndicatorsGreen, Gary P.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4434Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04434.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04433MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04433MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey of Local Government Economic Development, 1998
[electronic resource]
Gary P. Green
2007-09-17Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4433NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection was a part of a larger research
project designed to examine the role of public-private partnerships
and local development organizations (LDO) in rural America. Most
studies of local development policy have examined the activities of
local governments, or, in a few cases, the effects of LDOs. There has
been, however, little research on how local governments and
development organizations interact, the effects of their activities on
policies, and the outcomes of those policies on job and income
growth. The purpose of this research project was to gain a better
understanding of the organization of economic development in
nonmetropolitan areas, specifically, what factors led to policy
adoption and the creation of an LDO in a community.
In the fall of 1998, this survey was sent to local government
officials in United States cities with a population between 2,500 and
50,000 (nonmetropolitan areas).
The survey included questions on what was being done to promote
economic development and attract new businesses, whether new
businesses were created or moved into the community as a result of the
development efforts, funding for economic development, and sources of
the funding (e.g., state grants-in-aid or local revenues). Additional
topics included types of business incentives, performance agreements,
labor surveys (identifying wages and benefits), job training programs,
and types of barriers experienced. Each local government agency was
also surveyed on their interaction with organizations like the Chamber
of Commerce, private lending institutions, neighborhood associations,
churches, and regional planning commissions, and whether any of these
organizations helped in developing local economic development
strategies and in what manner.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04433.v1
public policyicpsrrural developmenticpsrtax deductionsicpsrbusinessesicpsrcommunitiesicpsrcommunity organizationsicpsrcountiesicpsreconomic developmenticpsreconomic planningicpsreconomic policyicpsrfinancial supporticpsrgovernment agenciesicpsrgrantsicpsrlabor unionsicpsrlocal governmenticpsrnongovernmental organizationsicpsrnonprofit organizationsicpsrICPSR IV.C. Economic Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Economic Processes and IndicatorsGreen, Gary P.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4433Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04433.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34551MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34551MiAaIMiAaI
Public Health Law Research Distracted Driving Laws Dataset, 2000-2011
[electronic resource]
Temple University Beasley School of Law
2013-05-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34551NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This project compiled state and District of Columbia laws regulating the use of mobile communication devices (MCD) by individuals operating motor vehicles and coded some of the laws' features in a data file.
The data file contains information about prohibitions against talking or texting on a MCD for different groups of drivers:
16 year old drivers with provisional or beginner licenses
All 16 year old drivers
17 year old drivers with provisional or beginner licenses
All 17 year old drivers
18 year old drivers with provisional or beginner licenses
All 18 year old drivers
All drivers with provisional or beginner licenses
All drivers
For each of these groups, the coded features include the date each provision against talking or texting on a MCD went into effect, whether there is hands-free exception to the prohibition, whether there is a primary or secondary method of enforcement, and the minimum and maximum fines for the first, second, and third violations. The data file is structured so that each record reflects the coded features of relevant law at a given month. Thus, every state and the District of Columbia has 144 records in the file, one for each month from January 2000 to December 2011.
A separate PDF file contains the text of the laws.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34551.v1
automobile useicpsrcellular phonesicpsrdriving lawsicpsrmobile communication devicesicpsrdistracted drivingicpsrpublic policyicpsrtextingicpsrICPSR XII. Legal SystemsHMCA V. OtherTemple University Beasley School of LawInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34551Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34551.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR00065MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR00065MiAaIMiAaI
Public Policy and Socio-Economic Data for Large Cities in the United States, 1960
[electronic resource]
Herman Turk
2008-03-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR65NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection provides information on
municipal expenditures, revenues, and characteristics of
government and of the population for all incorporated
cities of over 100,000 population in the United States in
1960. Variables also provide selected information on the 1960
presidential election, as well as information on employment,
voluntary associations, income, and education.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00065.v1
economic indicatorsicpsrcitiesicpsrlocal governmenticpsrmunicipal expendituresicpsrmunicipalitiesicpsrpublic policyicpsrurban areasicpsrurban populationicpsrgovernment expendituresicpsrRCMD XIII. Race and EthnicityICPSR VIII.B.1. Governmental Structures, Policies, and Capabilities, Historical and Contemporary Public Policy Indicators, United StatesTurk, HermanInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)65Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00065.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR01128MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1997 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR01128MiAaIMiAaI
Reducing Toxic Chemical Releases and Transfers
[electronic resource] Explaining Outcomes for a Voluntary Program
Laurence O'Toole
,
Chilik Yu
,
James Cooley
,
Gail Cowie
,
Susan Crow
,
Terry DeMeo
,
Stephanie Herbert
1997-05-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1997ICPSR1128NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Relatively little is known about the possibilities and limitations
of voluntary public programs. The so-called 33/50 Program for reducing
releases of certain toxic chemicals into the environment provides a useful
instance for examination. In an investigation of toxics-reduction efforts,
with states as units of analysis, economic and policy variables help to
explain results. In particular, channels and approaches used in communicating
policy intentions are related to outcomes. Voluntary programs can make a
difference, but the details of execution, including the extent and nature of
field efforts, influence outcomes.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01128.v1
public policyicpsrenvironmenticpsrICPSR XVIII. Replication DatasetsO'Toole, LaurenceYu, ChilikCooley, JamesCowie, GailCrow, SusanDeMeo, TerryHerbert, StephanieInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)1128Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01128.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR01339MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR01339MiAaIMiAaI
Repeated Events Survival Models
[electronic resource]The Conditional Frailty Model
Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier
,
Suzanna DeBoef
2007-01-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR1339NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Repeated events processes are ubiquitous across a great
range of important health, medical, and public policy applications,
but models for these processes have serious limitations. Alternative
estimators often produce different inferences concerning treatment
effects due to bias and inefficiency. We recommend a robust strategy
for the estimation of effects in medical treatments, social
conditions, individual behaviors, and public policy programs in
repeated events survival models under three common conditions:
heterogeneity across individuals, dependence across the number of
events, and both heterogeneity and event dependence. We develop a new
model for repeated events processes that accurately accounts for the
various conditions of heterogeneity and event dependence by using a
frailty term, stratification, and gap time formulation of the risk
set. We examine the performance of these models and others that are
commonly used in applied work using Monte Carlo simulations, and apply
the findings to data on chronic granulomatous disease and cystic.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01339.v1
policy makingicpsrpublic policyicpsrtreatmenticpsrICPSR XVIII. Replication DatasetsBox-Steffensmeier, Janet M.DeBoef, SuzannaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)1339Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01339.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20903MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20903MiAaIMiAaI
Setting the Alcohol-control Agenda
[electronic resource]Popular Attitudes and Legislative Responses Toward Alcohol Control and Prohibition in the United States, 1890-1950
Mark Lawrence Schrad
2008-02-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR20903NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These datasets were constructed to discern whether the
dramatic policy punctuations associated with the Eighteenth and
Twenty-First Amendments to the United States Constitution, which
instituted and repealed, respectively, the policy of alcohol
prohibition, could best be accounted for through the use of punctuated
equilibrium theory. To that end, two datasets were constructed. The
first attempts to gauge public attitudes toward alcohol control and
prohibition, as well as its place on the public agenda, through a
coding of all entries related to alcohol control and prohibition in
the READER'S GUIDE TO PERIODICAL LITERATURE, from 1890 through 1950,
using a simplified version of the general coding protocols of the
Policy Agendas Project (PAP). The second dataset seeks to gauge
legislative activity and the issues placed on the legislative agenda
through a similar coding of the hearings sections in the Congressional
Information Service's CIS ANNUAL: ABSTRACTS OF CONGRESSIONAL
PUBLICATIONS AND LEGISLATIVE HISTORY CITATIONS for the same time
period.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20903.v1
alcoholicpsrcongressional committeesicpsrcongressional hearingsicpsrconstitutional amendmentsicpsrhistorical dataicpsrlegislationicpsrlegislative issuesicpsrliquor control lawsicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrProhibition Eraicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrUnited States CongressicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States SenateicpsrDATAPASS I. NDIIPPICPSR XIII. Legislative and Deliberative BodiesICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United StatesSchrad, Mark LawrenceInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20903Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20903.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07368MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07368MiAaIMiAaI
SETUPS
[electronic resource] American Politics
American Political Science Association
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7368NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
Supplementary Empirical Teaching Units in Political Science
(SETUPS) for American Politics are computer-related modules designed
for use in teaching introductory courses in American government and
politics. The modules are intended to demonstrate the process of
examining evidence and reaching conclusions and to stimulate students
to independent, critical thinking and a deeper understanding of
substantive content. They enable students with no previous training to
make use of the computer to analyze data on political behavior or to
see the results of policy decisions by use of a simulation model. The
SETUPS: AMERICAN POLITICS modules were developed by a group of political
scientists with experience in teaching introductory American government
courses who were brought together in a workshop supported by a grant
from the National Science Foundation in the summer of 1974. The
American Political Science Association administered the grant, and the
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research was host
to the workshop and provided data for most of the SETUPS. The modules
were tested and evaluated during the 1974-1975 academic year by
students and faculty in 155 classes at 69 universities and colleges.
Appropriate revisions were made based upon this experience. This
collection comprises 15 separate modules: (1) Political Socialization
Across the Generations, (2) Political Participation, (3) Voting Behavior,
The 1980 Election, (4) Elections and the Mass Media, (5) The Supreme
Court in American Politics, Court Decisions, (6) The Supreme Court in
American Politics, Police Interrogations, (7) The Dynamics of Political
Budgeting, A Public Policy Simulation, State Expenditures, (8) The
Dynamics of Political Budgeting, A Public Policy Simulation, SIMSTATE
Simulation, (9) The Dynamics of Political Budgeting, A Public Policy
Simulation, SIMSTATE II Simulation, (10) Fear of Crime, (11) Presidential
Popularity in America, Presidential Popularity, (12) Presidential
Popularity in America, Advanced Analyses, (13) Campaign '80, The Public
and the Presidential Selection Process, (14) Voting Behavior, The 1976
Election, and (15) Policy Responsiveness and Fiscal Strain in 51
American Communities. Parts 8 and 9 are FORTRAN IV program SIMSTATE
sourcedecks intended to simulate the interaction of state policies.
Variables in the various modules provide information on respondents'
level of political involvement and knowledge of political issues,
general political attitudes and beliefs, news media exposure and usage,
voting behavior (Parts 1, 2, and 3), and sectional biases (15). Other
items provide information on respondents' views of government, politics,
Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter as presidents, best form of government,
government spending (Part 3), local police, the Supreme Court (Parts 4
and 15), the economy, and domestic and foreign affairs. Additional items
probed respondents' opinions of prayer in school, abortion, the Equal
Rights Amendment Law, nuclear energy, and the most important national
problem and the political party most suitable to handle it (Part 3). Also
included are items on votes of Supreme Court judges (Part 5), arrest of
criminal suspects and their treatment by law enforcement agencies (Part 6),
federal government expenditures and budgeting (Part 7), respondents'
feelings of safety at home, neighborhood crime rate, frequency of
various kinds of criminal victimization, the personal characteristics of
the targets of those crimes (Part 10), respondents' opinions of and choice
of party presidential candidates nominees (Part 13), voter turnout for
city elections (15), urban unrest, and population growth rate.
Demographic items specify age, sex, race, marital status, education,
occupation, income, social class identification, religion, political
party affiliation, and union membership.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07368.v1
national electionsicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpoliticsicpsrpublic policyicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrUnited States Supreme Courticpsrvoting behavioricpsrcomputer programsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrfear of crimeicpsrgovernmenticpsrgovernment performanceicpsrinstructional materialsicpsrlaw enforcementicpsrmass mediaicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemICPSR X.A.1. Instructional Packages and Computer Programs, Instructional Packages, SETUPSAmerican Political Science AssociationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7368Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07368.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR00015MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR00015MiAaIMiAaI
Socio-Economic, Public Policy, and Political Data for the United States, 1890-1960
[electronic resource]
Richard I. Hofferbert
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR15NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study contains data for 48 states at decennial points
from 1890 to 1960, including electoral, demographic, economic, public
expenditure, and educational information. The majority of the variables
in the dataset are derived measures such as percentages, ratios,
indices, and ranks of the states along various dimensions presented.
The data were collected and prepared by the staff of the Comparative
Political Behavior Project of the Cornell University Center for
International Studies.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00015.v1
economic behavioricpsreducationicpsrexpendituresicpsrgovernment expendituresicpsrpublic policyicpsrvoting behavioricpsrRCMD X. Political ParticipationRCMD XI. Poverty and IncomeICPSR VIII.B.1. Governmental Structures, Policies, and Capabilities, Historical and Contemporary Public Policy Indicators, United StatesHofferbert, Richard I.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)15Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00015.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04024MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04024MiAaIMiAaI
Study of Political Socialization
[electronic resource] Parent-Child Pairs Based on Survey of Youth Panel and Their Offspring, 1997
M. Kent Jennings
,
Laura Stoker
2004-10-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR4024NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This panel study is part of a series of surveys designed to
assess political continuity and change across time for biologically
related generations and to gauge the impact of life-stage events and
historical trends on their behaviors and attitudes. The purpose of
this study was to obtain social, political, and economic information
from the "youth" portion of the socialization panel study, which began
in 1965 with a national sample of high school seniors, and from their
offspring aged 15 and older as of 1997. This data collection combines
the two sources of data in the form of parent-child pairs, with one
key objective being the analysis of influence relationships within the
family. The dataset is explicitly designed to facilitate the use of
parent-child pairs as the units of analysis. The parent portion
includes 478 cases, omitting the 457 cases (49 percent of the 935
total) for which there were no eligible offspring or where the
offspring could not be located, did not receive the self-administered
questionnaires (SAQ), or elected not to complete it. See YOUTH-PARENT
SOCIALIZATION PANEL STUDY, 1965-1997: YOUTH WAVE IV, 1997 (ICPSR 4023)
for the data file containing all of the Wave IV cases. The Offspring
portion (the third generation) includes 769 cases and can be used in
and of itself, but it omits 10 cases that could not be linked with a
particular parent. See NATIONAL SURVEY OF THIRD GENERATION MEMBERS OF
THE YOUTH-PARENT POLITICAL SOCIALIZATION STUDY, 1997 (ICPSR 3926) for
a data file containing all cases. Collection of SAQ data from the
offspring was dependent upon their parents' supplying the correct
locations of their eligible offspring. Background variables include
age, sex, religious orientation, level of religious participation,
marital status, ethnicity, educational status and background, place of
residence, family income, and employment status.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04024.v1
adolescentsicpsrfamily lifeicpsrfamily relationsicpsrhigh school studentsicpsrhigh schoolsicpsrlife eventsicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrpeer groupsicpsrpersonalityicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical behavioricpsrpolitical changeicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partisanshipicpsrpolitical socializationicpsrpublic policyicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial protesticpsrsocial studiesicpsrstudent attitudesicpsrtrendsicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesJennings, M. KentStoker, LauraInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4024Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04024.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08284MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08284MiAaIMiAaI
Survey of Public Interest Group Members, 1982
[electronic resource]
Constance Ewing Cook
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8284NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection examines the attitudes of Michigan
members of Common Cause, the American Civil Liberties Union, the
League of Women Voters, and the Conservative Caucus. The data file is
comprised of four components, one for each public interest group --
thus, each respondent may have up to four records one for each
interest group. Each component contains the same 29
variables. Respondents were queried regarding their reasons for
joining the organizations, level of activism, level of satisfaction
with the group, plans for membership renewal, knowledge of the group's
issues, and extent of involvement in organizational issues. Gender,
age, education, and occupation of the members are also included in the
data.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08284.v1
activismicpsradvocacyicpsrcitizen participationicpsrlobbyingicpsrmembershipsicpsrpublic interest groupsicpsrsocial valuesicpsrspecial interest groupsicpsrpublic policyicpsrICPSR XV.A. Organizational Behavior, United StatesCook, Constance EwingInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8284Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08284.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29841MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29841MiAaIMiAaI
Texas Higher Education Opportunity Project
[electronic resource]
Marta Tienda
,
Teresa A. Sullivan
2011-06-02Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR29841NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
hich students deliberately changed schools in order to qualify for the benefits of the Top 10 Percent law. Students that had dropped out of school, regardless of whether they returned to school or not, were asked a series of questions that explored reasons for dropping out and activities during their time away from school. Students that dropped out, but then returned to the same high school are defined as Stayers. Those that dropped out and did not return to school, or attended a different school, are defined as Leavers. The Senior Wave 3 survey is the second follow-up interview with the subsample of 8,345 baseline seniors. The Wave 3 survey sought to determine students' educational pursuits and levels of attainment, and other life choices, four years after high school graduation. For students following a four-year path through college or university, graduation would occur in 2006, but a special strength of Wave 3 is its ability to identify delayed college entry; transfers among post-secondary institutions, including transfers to and from community colleges; withdrawal from college; and variation in school-to-work trajectories for students according to class rank. The THEOP administrative data consists of college applications and enrollee college transcripts obtained from nine Texas universities--seven public and two private institutions. For the public institutions, freshman Application Data spans several years prior to the implementation of the Texas Top 10 Percent law in 1998, and extends until at least 2002. Application Data for the two private institutions is available only for the period after implementation of the automatic admission law.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29841.v1
race relationsicpsrracial discriminationicpsrstudentsicpsruniversitiesicpsracademic abilityicpsracademic achievementicpsracademic degreesicpsracademic standardsicpsradmissions policiesicpsrAffirmative Actionicpsrcollege studentsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreducationicpsreducational environmenticpsreducational opportunitiesicpsreducational populationsicpsreducational systemicpsrethnic discriminationicpsrethnic groupsicpsrethnic tensionsicpsrethnicityicpsrhigh school graduatesicpsrhigh school studentsicpsrhigher educationicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsrpublic policyicpsrqualificationsicpsrraceicpsrICPSR V.A. Education, United StatesRCMD III. EducationDSDR VII. Population Growth and DeclineDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsTienda, MartaSullivan, Teresa A.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29841Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29841.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04532MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04532MiAaIMiAaI
Three Generations Combined, 1965-1997
[electronic resource]
Patrick Elliot
2007-03-23Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4532NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This dataset combines three existing datasets: STUDENT-PARENT
SOCIALIZATION STUDY, 1965 (ICPSR 7286), YOUTH-PARENT SOCIALIZATION
PANEL STUDY, 1965-1997: FOUR WAVES COMBINED (ICPSR 4037), and STUDY OF
POLITICAL SOCIALIZATION: PARENT-CHILD PAIRS BASED ON SURVEY OF YOUTH
PANEL AND THEIR OFFSPRING, 1997 (ICPSR 4024). It is designed for the
multi-generational study of the grandparents, parents, and children in
American families. The grandparents and parents were originally
interviewed in 1965 as a nationally-representative sample, and the
parents were interviewed again in 1973, 1982, and 1997. In addition,
the children of these parents were interviewed in 1997. Each child's
1997 data has been merged with their parent's data and their
corresponding grandparent's data. Since two, one, or zero grandparents
were interviewed for each parent in 1965, there may be one or two
entries per child.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04532.v1
political partisanshipicpsrpolitical socializationicpsrpublic policyicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial protesticpsrsocial studiesicpsrstudent attitudesicpsrtrendsicpsrtrust in governmenticpsradolescentsicpsrfamily lifeicpsrfamily relationsicpsrhigh school studentsicpsrhigh schoolsicpsrlife eventsicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparental influenceicpsrparentsicpsrpeer groupsicpsrpersonalityicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical behavioricpsrpolitical changeicpsrpolitical participationicpsrICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesElliot, PatrickInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4532Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04532.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03030MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03030MiAaIMiAaI
United States Biotechnology Study, 1997-1998
[electronic resource]
Jon D. Miller
2000-12-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR3030NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
issues were to them
personally, how informed they felt about biotechnology, and if they
had ever talked about this subject with someone prior to the
interview. Demographic attributes collected include political
participation (including whether the respondent had written or spoken
to any public official during the past year, their party affiliation,
and who they voted for in 1996), religious affiliation and
participation, marital status, number of adults and children in the
household, educational attainment and field of study (including
specific science and math courses taken in high school and any current
studies), current employment status and occupation, computer usage at
work, pets, language spoken at home, computer ownership, World Wide
Web access and usage, smoking, geographic location, race, age, and
gender.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03030.v1
biotechnologyicpsrcloningicpsrethicsicpsrgenetic engineeringicpsrgovernment regulationicpsrknowledge (awareness)icpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic policyicpsrquality of lifeicpsrscientific researchicpsrtechnologyicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesMiller, Jon D.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3030Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03030.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06040MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1995 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06040MiAaIMiAaI
Washington, DC, Representatives
[electronic resource]Private Interests in National Policymaking, 1982-1983
John P. Heinz
,
Edward O. Laumann
,
Robert L. Nelson
,
Robert H. Salisbury
2009-04-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1995ICPSR6040NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study was undertaken to research systematically the
process through which private and governmental actors in United States
federal policy systems make decisions. A primary focus was the ways in
which individual private representatives of interest groups in
Washington, DC, interact with the agencies of the federal government.
The data are drawn from interviews conducted in 1983-1984 with samples
of two distinct populations: Washington representatives, and American
Bar Foundation client organizations that employ Washington
representatives. The scope of the inquiry was narrowed to four
particular policy domains: agriculture, energy, health, and labor. Each
domain was operationally defined by a list of specific policy concerns.
Questions were structured around specific policy proposals acted upon
by Congress in 1979-1982: 22 in agriculture, 13 in energy, 22 in
health, and 22 in labor. Respondents were asked to rate the importance
of various information sources, and to give their positions on general
social and political issues. Background data collected on respondents
included participation in electoral politics, political party
membership, religious preference, nationality, age, tenure in
Washington, race, sex, and parents' occupation and political party
affiliations.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06040.v2
government agenciesicpsrhealth careicpsrlabor (work)icpsrpolitical issuesicpsrprivate sectoricpsrpublic policyicpsrsocial issuesicpsrspecial interest groupsicpsrdecision makingicpsrenergyicpsrfederal governmenticpsragricultureicpsrICPSR VI.A. Elites and Leadership, United StatesHeinz, John P.Laumann, Edward O.Nelson, Robert L.Salisbury, Robert H.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6040Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06040.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07262MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07262MiAaIMiAaI
Washington Lobbyists Survey, 1956-1957
[electronic resource]
Lester Milbrath
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7262NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study interviewed a sample of registered lobbyists
from Washington, DC, during the academic year 1956-1957. Questions
investigated lobbyists' role in policy-making, their occupational
history, interest in public affairs, reasons for becoming a lobbyist,
and political activities. Other variables concern the respondents'
relationships to the organizations they represented, where they tried
to establish contact, techniques they used to do so, how their
lobbying skills were acquired, and self-appraisal of their success. Of
the 114 respondents included in the sample, 101 were actually
interviewed. For the remaining 13, personal data as well as some
information about their lobbying activities were obtained from public
records and informal conversations. Demographic data include age,
level of education, personal income, religious preference, party
affiliation, marital status, and size of family.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07262.v1
campaign contributionsicpsrinfluenceicpsrlobbyingicpsrlobbyistsicpsrpersuasionicpsrpolicy makingicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpoliticsicpsrpublic policyicpsrspecial interest groupsicpsrICPSR XIII.B. Legislative and Deliberative Bodies, Studies of Decision-Making in Deliberative BodiesMilbrath, LesterInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7262Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07262.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35309MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35309MiAaIMiAaI
Washington Representatives Study (Organized Interests in Washington Politics) - 1981, 1991, 2001, 2006, 2011
[electronic resource]
Kay Schlozman
,
Traci Burch
,
Philip Edward Jones
,
Hye Young You
,
Sidney Verba
,
Henry E. Brady
2014-09-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35309NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Washington Representatives Study includes information about thousands of organizations involved in Washington D.C. politics, their organizational characteristics including the kinds of interests they represented and the nature of their membership, if any, and the activities they undertook in the pursuit of policy influence.
This collection encompasses all organizations listed in the Washington Representatives directories (published by Columbia Books) for 1981, 1991, 2001, 2006, and 2011 as being active in national politics by virtue of either having an office in the D.C. area, or hiring D.C.-area consultants or counsel to represent them. These organizations have been classified into 96 categories based, principally, on the kinds of interests represented. Variables include organization name, membership category, founding year, and main objective, as well as number of lobbyists hired, number of amicus briefs filed, political action committee (PAC) donations made, and web-based lobbying activities.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35309.v1
foreign policyicpsrgovernmenticpsrlobbyingicpsrlobbyistsicpsrnational politicsicpsrorganizationsicpsrpolitical action committeesicpsrpolitical activismicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical influenceicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical representationicpsrpoliticsicpsrpublic policyicpsrspecial interest groupsicpsrICPSR XV. Organizational BehaviorICPSR XIV.B.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Political Participation, United StatesICPSR XV.A. Organizational Behavior, United StatesSchlozman, KayBurch, TraciJones, Philip EdwardYou, Hye YoungVerba, SidneyBrady, Henry E.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35309Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35309.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07779MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07779MiAaIMiAaI
Youth-Parent Socialization Panel Study, 1965-1973
[electronic resource]
M. Kent Jennings
,
Richard G. Niemi
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7779NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study has two parts: a youth panel and a parent panel.
High school students and their parents were interviewed in 1965 and
reinterviewed in 1973. The panel study is designed to assess political
continuity and change across time for two biologically-related
generations and to explore life cycle, generational, and period
effects. Analysis can be performed at the aggregate as well as the
individual level. Because the two samples come from the same families,
parent-offspring pairs can be formed (by matching I.D. numbers). At the
core of the study are a number of standard political variables
available at both time points. The 1973 wave includes a number of
questions that capture the political and non-political histories of the
respondent across the eight-year panel period. Also included in the
1973 data are a large number of variables dealing with perspectives on
public policy issues. The 1965 youth wave schedule contains detailed
questions about high school experiences, and both the youth and
parental schedules treat familial relationships.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07779.v2
social behavioricpsrsocial studiesicpsrstudent attitudesicpsrtrendsicpsrtrust in governmenticpsradolescentsicpsrfamily lifeicpsrfamily relationsicpsrhigh school studentsicpsrhigh schoolsicpsrlife cycleicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparental influenceicpsrparentsicpsrpeer groupsicpsrpersonalityicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical behavioricpsrpolitical changeicpsrpolitical partisanshipicpsrpolitical socializationicpsrpublic policyicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesRCMD X. Political ParticipationRCMD XII. Public OpinionNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsJennings, M. KentNiemi, Richard G.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7779Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07779.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09553MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1991 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09553MiAaIMiAaI
Youth-Parent Socialization Panel Study, 1965-1982
[electronic resource] Three Waves Combined
M. Kent Jennings
,
Gregory B. Markus
,
Richard G. Niemi
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1991ICPSR9553NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
For this panel survey a national sample of high school
seniors and their parents were interviewed in 1965, and again in 1973
and 1982. The survey gauges the impact of life-stage events and
historical trends on the behaviors and attitudes of respondents. Each
wave has a distinct focus. The 1965 data focus on high school
experiences, while the 1973 data deal with the protest era. Data
gathered in 1982 emphasize the maturing process and offer information
relating to parental issues and family relationships. Other major areas
of investigation include political participation, issue positions,
group evaluations, civic orientations, personal change over time,
stability in attitudes and behaviors over time, and partisanship and
electoral behavior.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09553.v1
adolescentsicpsrfamily lifeicpsrfamily relationsicpsrhigh school studentsicpsrhigh schoolsicpsrlife eventsicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrpeer groupsicpsrpersonalityicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical behavioricpsrpolitical changeicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partisanshipicpsrpolitical socializationicpsrpublic policyicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial protesticpsrsocial studiesicpsrstudent attitudesicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesDSDR IX. NIA Supported StudiesRCMD X. Political ParticipationRCMD XII. Public OpinionJennings, M. KentMarkus, Gregory B.Niemi, Richard G.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9553Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09553.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09134MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1990 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09134MiAaIMiAaI
Youth-Parent Socialization Panel Study, 1965-1982
[electronic resource]Wave III
M. Kent Jennings
,
Gregory B. Markus
,
Richard G. Niemi
2007-07-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1990ICPSR9134NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
For this panel survey a national sample of high school
seniors and their parents were interviewed in 1965, and twice later in
1973 and 1982. The survey gauges the impact of life-stage events and
historical trends on the behaviors and attitudes of respondents. Each
wave has a distinct focus. The 1965 data focus on high school
experiences, while the 1973 data deal with the protest era. Data
gathered in 1982 emphasize the maturing process and offer information
relating to parental issues and family relationships. Other major
areas of investigation include political participation, issue
positions, group evaluations, civic orientations, personal change over
time, stability in attitudes and behaviors over time, and partisanship
and electoral behavior.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09134.v4
adolescentsicpsrfamily lifeicpsrfamily relationsicpsrhigh school studentsicpsrhigh schoolsicpsrlife eventsicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrpeer groupsicpsrpersonalityicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical behavioricpsrpolitical changeicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partisanshipicpsrpolitical socializationicpsrpublic policyicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial protesticpsrsocial studiesicpsrstudent attitudesicpsrtrendsicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrDSDR IX. NIA Supported StudiesNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsRCMD X. Political ParticipationICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesRCMD XII. Public OpinionJennings, M. KentMarkus, Gregory B.Niemi, Richard G.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9134Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09134.v4 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04037MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04037MiAaIMiAaI
Youth-Parent Socialization Panel Study, 1965-1997
[electronic resource]Four Waves Combined
M. Kent Jennings
,
Gregory B. Markus
,
Richard G. Niemi
,
Laura Stoker
2005-11-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR4037NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Youth-Parent Socialization Panel Study is a series of
surveys designed to assess political continuity and change across time
for biologically-related generations and to gauge the impact of
life-stage events and historical trends on the behaviors and attitudes
of respondents. A national sample of high school seniors and their
parents was first surveyed in 1965. Subsequent surveys of the same
individuals were conducted in 1973, 1982, and 1997. This data
collection combines all four waves of youth data for the study. The
general objective of the data collection was to study the dynamics of
political attitudes and behaviors by obtaining data on the same
individuals as they aged from approximately 18 years of age in 1965 to
50 years of age in 1997. Especially when combined with other elements
of the study as released in other ICPSR collections in the Youth
Studies Series, this data collection facilitates the analysis of
generational, life cycle, and historical effects and political
influences on relationships within the family. This data collection
also has several distinctive properties. First, it is a longitudinal
study of a particular cohort, a national sample from the graduating
high school class of 1965. Second, it captures the respondents at key
points in their life stages -- at ages 18, 26, 35, and 50. Third, the
dataset contains many replicated measures over time as well as some
measures unique to each data point. Fourth, there is detailed
information about the respondents' life histories. Background
variables include age, sex, religious orientation, level of religious
participation, marital status, ethnicity, educational status and
background, place of residence, family income, and employment status.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04037.v1
adolescentsicpsrfamily lifeicpsrfamily relationsicpsrhigh school studentsicpsrhigh schoolsicpsrlife eventsicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrpeer groupsicpsrpersonalityicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical behavioricpsrpolitical changeicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partisanshipicpsrpolitical socializationicpsrpublic policyicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial protesticpsrsocial studiesicpsrstudent attitudesicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrDSDR IX. NIA Supported StudiesNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsRCMD XII. Public OpinionICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesRCMD X. Political ParticipationJennings, M. KentMarkus, Gregory B.Niemi, Richard G.Stoker, LauraInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4037Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04037.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04023MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04023MiAaIMiAaI
Youth-Parent Socialization Panel Study, 1965-1997
[electronic resource] Youth Wave IV, 1997
M. Kent Jennings
,
Laura Stoker
2005-12-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR4023NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This panel study is part of a series of surveys designed to
assess political continuity and change across time for biologically
related generations and to gauge the impact of life-stage events and
historical trends on the behaviors and attitudes of respondents. A
national sample of high school seniors and their parents was initially
interviewed in 1965 with subsequent surveys of the same individuals
conducted in 1973, 1982, and 1997. This data collection consists of
the fourth wave of youth interviews conducted in 1997. Individuals who
were identified and located from Wave III (1982) were reinterviewed
for this wave. Information was gathered on respondents' political
interest, party identification, political participation, interest in
public affairs, issue positions, group evaluations, civic
orientations, attitudes and behaviors over time, partisanship, and
electoral behavior. Respondents were queried about their views on
politics, concept of a good citizen, faith in government, and
attitudes toward federal government. Respondents were also asked to
indicate their feelings toward labor unions, activist groups, and
politicians, and to rate the influence level of certain groups.
Additional information was gathered on respondents' personal and
family changes since 1982. Summary variables from previous waves of
this study are also available. Background variables include age, sex,
religious orientation, level of religious participation, marital
status, ethnicity, educational status and background, place of
residence, family income, and employment status.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04023.v2
adolescentsicpsrfamily lifeicpsrlife eventsicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrpeer groupsicpsrpersonalityicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical behavioricpsrpolitical socializationicpsrpublic policyicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial protesticpsrsocial studiesicpsrstudent attitudesicpsrtrendsicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrfamily relationsicpsrhigh school studentsicpsrhigh schoolsicpsrpolitical changeicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partisanshipicpsrICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesRCMD X. Political ParticipationRCMD XII. Public OpinionJennings, M. KentStoker, LauraInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4023Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04023.v2