Actually I got other point where the amount in "Bankruptcy Notice" is excessive but the payments were made before the "Court Order".

The opponent says the payments cannot be considered as they weren't paid after the "Court Order". But in the JC afidavit, there is no reason given what the payments are for, just merely says not knowing about the payments.

Do you think I should include the above?

0 found this helpful

Helpful

answered on Feb 1, 2014 at 02:02by

yen yen

hi courtbias,

Out of RM1,600 amount for Court of Appeal, how much of it is deposit?

When did the creditor lawyer file Appeal to Judge in Chambers? Is it within 14 days of PKP decision?

0 found this helpful

Helpful

answered on Feb 1, 2014 at 06:17by

courtbias

Hi yen yen,

Out of RM1,600 amount for Court of Appeal, how much of it is deposit?

Its broken down to RM1K and RM600, I'm not sure which one is deposit.

When did the creditor lawyer file Appeal to Judge in Chambers? Is it within 14 days of PKP decision?

Yes it is withing 14 days.

Do you know some of the answer to my questions earlier to notalaywer?

I'm trying to get the Willian Chan book, do you know if the book has samples of "Rekod Rayuan"?

0 found this helpful

Helpful

answered on Feb 3, 2014 at 21:21by

notalawyer

Rekod Rayuan has to be filed within 8 weeks of Notis Rayuan otherwise it is game over.

There is a list of documents required ( for Rekod Rayuan ) listed in parts of this forum.
Search for it.

The Written Grounds of Judgement ( Alasan Penghakiman ) is also required in the Rekod Rayuan, but it is frequently late.
You need to prepare a letter addressed to the Assistant of the Judge requesting for the Alasan Penghakiman. Hand it over to the assistant personally.

The Sealed Perintah ( decision ) is also required in the Rekod Rayuan.
If the sealed perintah is also late, put in the Draft Perintah first.

You may need to file a Rekod Rayuan Tambahan later to include all docs that was late or missing in the Rekod Rayuan.

0 found this helpful

Helpful

answered on Feb 4, 2014 at 18:31by

courtbias

notalawyer, thanks for the guidance.

during BN hearing, the judge refuse to accept the "perjury" evidence because they were mentioned in "Written Submission" and "Afidavit Menentang Petisyen Pemiutang"

I told the judge that PKP agree new issue can be included inside the "Written Submission" because PKP don't want to do any "Oral Submission", but the judge refuse to listen.

I'll raise this in "Memorandum Rayuan" also.

0 found this helpful

Helpful

answered on Feb 4, 2014 at 21:21by

notalawyer

Please explain more about this "perjury" that the other party is alleged to have committed.