Of course. I don't see why people are criticizing me. If Cilic or Lopez didn't choke they surely would have won. Don't you guys remember Cilic owning Murray at USO 2009? When Marin plays his best tennis, Murray can't stand a chance.

And of course, the only reason Murray beat Berdych and Nole was because of the gale-force winds.

I think all champion need survive some test So if no wind then Murray could have lost didn't make sense.

If there was no rain last year I think Federer is already done last year.

Or if there was no rain in 08 then Murray would not need fight with Rafa for two days and rest only 10 hours before he play against Federer then Fed could lose a much tougher final

Of course. I don't see why people are criticizing me. If Cilic or Lopez didn't choke they surely would have won. Don't you guys remember Cilic owning Murray at USO 2009? When Marin plays his best tennis, Murray can't stand a chance.

And of course, the only reason Murray beat Berdych and Nole was because of the gale-force winds.

You really do yourself no favours at times. Ever thought that Murray wasn't playing his best Tennis in some of his matches vs Marin? You're deluded if you think that Murray doesn't stand a chance against Marin playing his best Tennis when their H2H is 9-1 in favour of Murray. Use logic dude. Murray only plays his best level when he needs to, whats the point in wasting energy when majority of matches he can cruise through. If his cruising does not work 9/10 he steps it up. So how can you flat out say it was Cillic and Lopez choking, how about Murray raised his level?

Also, enough with the wind BS already. You really do Nole no favours by claiming the only reason he lost was due to the wind. Nole is the world number 1, if he's the world number 1, he should be able to deal with ANY conditions, so don't make BS excuses.

Murray was indeed close to lose very early at USO (Lalo or Cilic), hipolymer was not that far off.

More to the point, Murray had a poor USOpen series (yes USO itself was very poor as well). I consider hipolymer's assessment that Murray performs badly after winning something big correct, or at least that was the case after the Olympics.

Of course. I don't see why people are criticizing me. If Cilic or Lopez didn't choke they surely would have won. Don't you guys remember Cilic owning Murray at USO 2009? When Marin plays his best tennis, Murray can't stand a chance.

And of course, the only reason Murray beat Berdych and Nole was because of the gale-force winds.

Murray was indeed close to lose very early at USO (Lalo or Cilic), hipolymer was not that far off.

More to the point, Murray had a poor USOpen series (yes USO itself was very poor as well). I consider hipolymer's assessment that Murray performs badly after winning something big correct, or at least that was the case after the Olympics.

That's like giving those who predicted Coria to win RG credit simply because he almost won though.

07-24-2013 01:20 PM

randomtennisfan

Re: Murray winning 1st slam vs Djokovic winning Roland Garros

At least he got the bit about Murray going far at AO open right

This thread has more than 15 replies.
Click here to review the whole thread.