Report: Ultimately, Divestment Will Make Fossil Fuel Giants Suffer

Report: Ultimately, Divestment Will Make Fossil Fuel Giants Suffer

Fossil fuel divestment stigmatizes dirty energy giants and likely to cost fossil fuel companies billions in the long run

by

Jacob Chamberlain, staff writer

An environmental campaign calling on groups to pull their investments from fossil fuel corporations could have a major impact on the industry and carries the potential to spur widespread political and economic stigmatization of big money polluters, a study released this week by Oxford University found.

Pulling from past examples of divestment campaigns such as those against companies in apartheid South Africa, the study argues that while initial financial impacts on fossil fuel corporations may be limited, such campaigns have the ability to create a stigma around industries or particular corporations "that scares away suppliers, subcontractors, potential employees, and customers." This, in turn, impacts the ability of those companies to exert influence over governmental policy and amongst shareholders. In the long run, profits will suffer and companies will change behavior.

And current divestment campaigns such as 350.org's 'Fossil Free' effort are doing just that.

Fossil Free, a quickly growing divestment campaign at the center of the Oxford study, has influenced 41 institutions since 2010 to divest from the fossil fuel industry, and "poses the most far-reaching threat to fossil fuel companies and the vast energy value chain," the report states.

The movement seems to be taking hold. As the study shows, climate change is having a direct impact on investors across the globe—up to 81% of investors polled—many of whom have been prompted to divest from fossil fuels.

While stigmatization alone is not likely to threaten the overall survival of the fossil fuel industry, it will likely cost fossil fuel companies billions in the long run, according to the study, and will play a major role in any fight to decrease the world's overall dependence on fossil fuels.

As Bill McKibben, the environmental campaigner who leads the 350.org told The Guardian: "This divestment campaign is just one front in the climate fight, but of all the actions people can take to bring about structural change, it's probably the easiest. Severing our ties with the guys digging up the carbon won't bankrupt them--but it will start to politically bankrupt them, and make their job of dominating the planet's politics that much harder."

_______________________

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Further

Lord, what would John Lennon have made of the Trump monster? Marking Thursday's 36th anniversary of Lennon's murder, Yoko Ono posted a plea for gun control, calling his death "a hollowing experience" and pleading, "Together, let's bring back America, the green land of Peace." With so many seeking solace in these ugly times, mourns one fan, "Oh John, you really should be here." Lennon conceded then, and likely would now, "Reality leaves a lot to the imagination."