Well, ok , the patch actually is about the ear property of the bunny objects not the bunny class themselves. furry bunny ears finds less than half a million in google while fuzzy bunny ears has a million and a half.

From a biological accuracy standpoint, this is an exceedingly important patch that fixes a gross inaccuracy thus must be applied immediately.

As @Xano optioned, if for some reason bunnies are no longer to be referenced, then the recommended replacement from a taxonomic perspective (meta data used for selection: small, cute, fuzzy, quantity-of-internet-memes, quality-of-internet-memes, is-a-cat) is "kittens", which also has "fuzzy" ears.

When the bunny was here, the bunny's ears were fuzzy. We don't need a novella in a Simple Test to explain why the bunny has departed. Perhaps it left for more carrot-laden gardens. Or perhaps it simply grew up.

Regardless if the patch rollers wish to get a new bunny whose ears are fuzzy, the Grammar Police approve this patch.

Although it's true that many bunny ears are fuzzy, others are DEFINITELY furry. In fact, it's even possible for the same bunny ear to be fuzzy in one part but furry in another, as I think can be clearly seen from these pictures.

I believe it's important that Drupal support all kinds of bunnies. I therefore propose this followup patch which will allow sites to decide for themselves.