Segregated ("seg") funds are investment funds sponsored by life
insurers. They differ from mutual funds mainly in their provision of
capital guarantees on maturity and upon death. While the fees on many
seg funds are simply prohibitive, the capital guarantees may provide a
good opportunity for seg fund investors who have experienced steep
losses over the past couple of years.

Seg fund guarantees

A seg fund, which is technically a variable annuity contract, provides
both maturity and death guarantees. The maturity guarantee works like
this: An investor (a.k.a. policyholder) will receive, at maturity
(i.e. on the policy 's ten year anniversary), the greater of the
market value of the policy and three-quarters of the net deposits into
the policy. A few years ago, it was standard practice for insurers to
offer a full 100 per cent maturity guarantee, rather than the 75 per
cent mandated guarantee. Today, both options are available with the
higher guarantee carrying higher fees.

The death guarantee works similarly, except that the timing isn't
based on a set period, but rather upon death. Again, the policyholder
is guaranteed to receive either the market value of the policy or 75
per cent of the net deposits - whichever is greater.

While payments with regard to both guarantees are taxable as capital
gains, the death "top up" payment isn't likely to attract any tax bill
since a capital loss equal to the top up is usually available upon
death as an offset.

Also, as you can tell by my wording, each of these guarantees is based
on each "policy". But just like any investment account, most investors
hold more than one fund inside of each seg fund policy. In other
words, diversifying by holding more than one fund within one policy
reduces the likelihood of ever needing the guarantee (and results in
overpaying for the benefits).

Finally, making an outright withdrawal from a policy may affect the
guarantee. For example, a policyholder invested $10,000 and watches
the market value fall to $5,000. If this policyholder withdraws
$1,000, her guarantee will fall by 20 per cent. In other words, some
insurers will not stick strictly to the net amount invested (which
would be $9,000 in our example) but rather reduce the guarantee
proportionately based on outright withdrawals as a percentage of
market value at the time of each withdrawal.

Technology seg funds

We know that technology investment funds sold like made back in 1999
and 2000 - and seg funds were no exception. I propose that those seg
fund investors who have been most severely burned by the bursting of
the tech bubble may be sitting on the best returning investment they
can find over the next several years.

Only five seg funds emphasizing technology stocks have existed for a
full three years, as of the end of July. The median loss by these
funds was negative 26.4 per cent per year. Put another way, the median
technology seg fund has shed more than 60 per cent of its value over
the past three years.

The opportunity

What I see as an opportunity is really for those investors who held
seg funds through the tech stock debacle until today. An investor who
purchased a technology seg fund three years ago would have probably
bought into a fund offering 100 per cent maturity guarantees. Using
the figures from the median technology seg fund, an investor would
realize a rate of return of 14 per cent annually simply by hanging
onto the battered fund and simply getting original capital back.

Sure, overall all such an investor would get back would be their
original investment in my example. However, the money is already lost,
so the focus has to be on a forward-looking basis.

An investor who invested $5 in a technology seg fund three years ago
would be left with $2 today; but may be guaranteed to receive $5 in
seven years. Turning $2 into $5 over a seven-year period is equal to
earning a rate of return of about 14 per cent per year. And that's
guaranteed. Even if only 75 per cent of the original capital is
guaranteed at maturity, that's still equivalent to a return of nearly
9.5 per cent per year over the next seven years.

That's a tough deal to beat on a forward-looking basis.

Recommendation

Before you cringe at the thought of hanging onto your battered
technology fund for another seven years, try to forget the awful
experience you've had over the past couple of years. I won't deny that
returns for tech stocks have been downright ugly over that time; but
the focus should be on what lies ahead.

I'm not endorsing the purchase of seg funds for the capital guarantee
feature. Rather, for technology seg fund investors who are already
sitting on big paper losses, the potential for a very attractive rate
of return lies ahead in years to come. In planning your portfolio
decisions, this is something to keep in mind.

Dan Hallett, CFA, CFP is the President of Dan Hallett & Associates Inc. in
Windsor Ontario. DH&A is registered as Investment Counsel in Ontario and
provides independent investment research to financial advisors. He can be
reached at dha@danhallett.com

Disclaimers: Consult with a
qualified investment adviser before trading. Past performance is a
poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site,
and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it
constitute, financial advice or recommendations. The information on
this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any
other way. More...