Tuesday, August 24, 2010

I was originally working a piece with which I was struggling to finish. I was attempting to bring much research to a head covering the history, belief system, and out and out lies of modern day Zionist Israel and Zionism itself. As I was reading through it, I came to the realization I was simply rehashing research that had already been done by others before me, and the information I was presenting was nothing new. It can already be found easily by those willing to do a little digging in their search for the truth. There are literally volumes of works to be found on this subject alone, and it basically boils down to one statement no matter how much research you read. Zionism is a LIE. It is based on a lie, and it perpetuates that lie daily.

See, the popular misconception of Zionism is the belief in it merely being the right of the Jewish state of Israel to exist. Sounds harmless enough, right? As long as we discount the fact that some other people may have been living there beforehand and would have to be kicked out of their homes, off their land, and be treated like animals. But, they’re just crazy Muslims, it’s not like they have any rights in the first place. They’re just all crazy terrorists who hate Jews, Christians, and anyone else different from them, and of course love to kill innocents by blowing shit up. Besides, God promised the Jews would be given back their homeland. He was just shuffling His feet on the matter, so why not allow the Zionists to take matters into their own hands, get the British to take control of Palestine from the Ottoman Empire after WWI, generate a little sympathy after WWII by claiming 42 million Jews were killed because of this terrible blind hatred called anti-Semitism (okay it was six million, but you get the point), and kick out, slaughter, murder some brown people to allow the white European Ashkenazi Jews to go back to their homeland of the “chosen ones” in 1948. Makes sense to me. You conspiracy people must be nuts if this doesn’t make any sense to you.

This isn’t the first time outrageous amounts of Jews have been killed by the evil anti-Semites. The wise writings of the Talmud tell of the Romans killing 4 billion Jews who lived in one city, the city of Bethar, Gittin 57b. [1]. It doesn’t matter if there were not even that many Jews in the entire world at the time, and most likely, there never have been. To say so is clearly anti-Semitic and you clearly have hatred deep in your heart. You are the reason Zionism began in the first place. Just ask Theodore Herzl:

"An idea rose on my heart to bring on anti-Semitism and to obliterate Jewish wealth.”[2]

See, we can’t smash anti-Semitism if it’s not there in the first place. We can’t blame it as the scourge of civilization as we know it if it only exists in small pockets here and there. It would seem the Zionists have heard of Hegel. Have you?

I did a lot of bouncing around on the internet when I was researching the other piece I was writing, and I was looking to find one mainstream definition for Zionism or the Zionist as it’s always good to see how they love to paint themselves as being harmless little do-gooders, being the righteous defenders of the Jewish people that they are. Did you know these people can’t even come up with one set upon definition for themselves? It’s obvious they are so involved in so many righteous activities, one can’t even begin to define their goals. So, I decided to go to the horse’s mouth. Check this out. We’ll start with how this website defines Zionism.

A Definition of Zionism:

Zionism is the national revival movement of the Jewish people. It holds that the Jews have the right to self-determination in their own national home, and the right to develop their national culture. Historically, Zionism strove to create a legally recognized national home for the Jews in their historical homeland. This goal was implemented by the creation of the State of Israel. Today, Zionism supports the existence of the state of Israel and helps to inspire a revival of Jewish national life, culture and language.”

Okay, that seems to be what your average sheep believes as well. Let’s move on.

Controversy - Definitions of Zionism are controversial. The above definition is intended to be historically correct and tries not to exclude any Zionist group or make Zionism the "property" of a particular political faction. Other definitions may either delegitimize Zionism intentionally, or may do so unintentionally and may introduce distortions of various types. There are many definitions of Zionism that we will explore below.

Many definitions? Okay, many words have a few definitions depending on their context and usage in a sentence. I just find it interesting we started with a definition, and move on to a disclaimer that states it’s “intended” to be correct. Old saying time, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. The word “intended” automatically means to me it’s not the actual definition, but I’ve been told I’m not all there. What’s even more interesting is after our well “intended” Zionist friends make that statement, it’s followed up by telling us there are many definitions of Zionism. Hmmm… let’s move on.

What is Zionism?

Zionism is a political movement that includes many shades of opinion. Different factions of the Zionist movement and different commentators have offered different definitions of Zionism that suit their purposes and outlook. Not all of them are historically or ideologically accurate as generalizations.

Okay then, when someone starts with asking what is Zionism, and is basically answered with “Uh, dunno” I have a slight problem with their credibility. I thought we started off by defining it, and now, we don’t know what it is, just that not all definitions are accurate. What? There seems to be some Orwellian doublespeak going on here that will have to be examined in our next part.

Hit Counter

Fair Use Notice

§ 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use40
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include —
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.