Further evidence that the highway era in America is coming to a close: Under financial strain, a state DOT has stepped and up said it will stop expanding highways.

Officials at the Wyoming Department of Transportation have said the agency will turn its resources toward maintenance of its existing highways. But even without new construction, current revenues may not be enough to keep the system in good repair for long, given the fiscal crisis the agency is experiencing, according to its director.

Wyoming will limit road construction to repairs until new revenues can be found. Photo: ##http://www.transportationtv.org/Pages/default.aspx## Transportation.tv##

“We’re beginning to look at our transportation system from a maintenance perspective rather than [as] a highway improvement program,” WYDOT Director John Cox told the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

With these changes, Cox said the agency would enter “kind of a survival mode,” but he acknowledged it only “staves off the inevitable” — the continued deterioration of the road system, unless additional funds can be found.

This is the latest sign that state DOTs are straining to provide Eisenhower-era infrastructure solutions in this new era of fiscal austerity.

Whether it’s the Missouri Department of Transportation laying off 1,200 workers, or Ohio DOT Director Jerry Wray pleading for a larger federal match, these are tough times for state DOTs. Congress is two years late in passing a transportation reauthorization, the recession has crippled state budgets, the Highway Trust Fund is nearly broke, and no national politician appears to be willing to raise the gas tax. In this context, WYDOT has made a sound decision to halt big spending on road projects and concentrate on the oft-neglected work of keeping the system in a state of good repair.

Cox indicated that WYDOT needs to find new revenue sources at the federal and state levels, without, of course, broaching the topic of a gas tax. Some states, Connecticut, Maryland and potentially Michigan, are averting disaster by grabbing an increased slice at the gas pump.

Still, most agencies have yet to come to terms with the reality that the days of building massive new highways to solve every transportation problem are over. Wisconsin and Texas, both breaking the bank for highway expansions when their coffers are running dry, are some of the worst examples.

“Wyoming DOT to Halt Highway Expansion” is different than building “a smaller number of projects designed to accommodate increasing traffic volumes. http://news.transportation.org/press_release.aspx?Action=ViewNews&NewsID=413 increasing traffic volumes.smaller number of projects designed to accommodate increasing traffic volumes.smaller number of projects designed to accommodate increasing traffic volumes. smaller number of projects designed to accommodate increasing traffic volumes.

So we get hear about Wyoming but no “Muni is a half billion dollars in the red” story?

Anonymous

Tragedy of the Commons anyone?

Glad to see the the collapse of Marxism finally make its way from East Berlin to Moscow to the Wyoming State DOT. There are about 500 Wyoming residents per mile of Wyoming Interstate.

One mile of Interstate costs $8 million at the least, so $16000 per resident.

Contrast that figure to your state and you’ll see how unsustainable that is.

Nomdeplume

Meanwhile, to the right of the article is an add for Transportation for America, which doesn’t quite appear to understand that our number one, two, three, etc. needs in transportation are to ensure that we maintain the existing system before we even think about expanding it or looking at new investments. This constant “adding rooms to the house while failing to fix the roof” approach is stupid.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

In a new report, Highway Boondoggles 2, U.S. PIRG and the Frontier Group profile the most wasteful highway projects that state DOTs are building. Today we highlight the proposed 40-mile widening of U.S. 20 in Iowa, which will cost many times as much as fixing all the state’s structurally deficient highway bridges. In June 2015, the […]

Word went out in a press release early last month: The Missouri Department of Transportation would be eliminating 1,200 jobs, closing 135 facilities and selling 740 pieces of equipment. “This is about survival,” said MoDOT spokesman Jorma Duran. “This is about making sure our roads and bridges continue to be maintained and operable.” Drastic times […]

If you could point to one aspect of American transportation policy that’s more disastrous than all the others, expanding highways and roads to the point of absurdity is probably it. In northeast Ohio, cities like Cleveland and Akron were hollowed out by highway building, but the state DOT still privileges road expansion instead of maintenance or investment in transit, […]

Got a road that needs fixing in your state? Don’t hold your breath. Chances are your state DOT has been busy building new roads, while neglecting maintenance. A new report from Smart Growth America [PDF] finds that states spent 57 percent of their highway funds building new roads between 2004 and 2008. As a result, […]

It wasn’t that long ago that state highway bureaus started adopting the more mode-neutral label, “department of transportation.” In practice, however, many state DOTs still function mainly as highway agencies. Now Oregon DOT is going a step further to leave the highway-centric approach behind. Jonathan Maus at Bike Portland reports today that Oregon DOT is […]

Usually when we hear news from a Streetsblog Network member about the Missouri Department of Transportation, it’s because the agency is blocking ideas like a complete streets bill or a highway-to-boulevard conversion in downtown St. Louis. The advocates at BikeWalkKC report that now the agency is feeling some grassroots resistance to its cars-first approach: The […]