]]>Comment on BIND Support by An important update on new PowerDNS Products | PowerDNS Bloghttps://www.isc.org/bind-subscription-2/#comment-17931
Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:05:36 +0000https://www.isc.org/?page_id=61892#comment-17931[…] version. Some other Open Source nameservers have used their liberal licensing to sell ‘subscriber versions‘ of their software that have additional core functionalities. This might create doubt […]
]]>Comment on BIND Features by Pervasive Monitoring and DNS Privacy (Part 2) - GTRIhttps://www.isc.org/downloads/bind/bind-features/#comment-17830
Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:40:32 +0000https://www.isc.org/?page_id=10107#comment-17830[…] make their way into the Internet Systems Consortium’s (ISCs) BIND software and appear on their list of features. In the meantime, we should consider how monitoring of our DNS traffic can leave us vulnerable to a […]
]]>Comment on Certificate Authority Authorization Records by rugkhttps://www.isc.org/blogs/certificate-authority-authorization-records/#comment-16273
Wed, 09 Dec 2015 20:53:46 +0000https://www.isc.org/?p=12411#comment-16273And how much widespread is it? I mean if only a few CAs support it the whole system does not help very much.
]]>Comment on Security Vulnerabilities by Heartbleed: Raised Consciousness for Other Vulnerabilities | Looking Glasshttps://www.isc.org/downloads/software-support-policy/security-advisory/#comment-12335
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:57:16 +0000https://www.isc.org/?page_id=8681#comment-12335[…] test for both functionality and security, but let’s face it…BIND is a big piece of software and vulnerabilities in it are still uncovered periodically. Do you know how important your DNS is to your organization? DNS is far more […]
]]>Comment on BIND 9.9 ARM by [Network Administration]: DNS | Punctuated Noisehttps://www.isc.org/downloads/bind/doc/bind-9-9/#comment-11085
Sat, 18 Jul 2015 06:18:56 +0000https://www.isc.org/?page_id=10872#comment-11085[…] such as .net, .org, .com, etc… The zone file and the resource records are documented in the BIND9 Server documentation. Here’s some relevant information for the zone […]
]]>Comment on Decommissioning the DLV by Madbunnyhttps://www.isc.org/blogs/dlv/#comment-10791
Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:19:30 +0000https://www.isc.org/?p=188093#comment-10791I share same opinion as Just Me. Right now there are (too) many big names who still do not (natively) support DNSSEC and not sure how good would be to stop offering the service. Just as example, CloudFlare postponed several times DNSSEC and some people like me are waiting for months to see any news. Then Namecheap one of the top domain registrars does support DNSSEC but only if you ask them over tickets and even then you are not sure how would be the initial response which depends on how much is educated their support staff currently dealing with you. The situation is even worst when it comes to payment processors like PayPal who was only one using DNSSEC. I could go on and on with similar examples but for whatever reason we are still far away from anything ideal.
]]>