In Mammon Among Friends, Malcolm C. Harris, Sr. provides commentary and news about the national economy, the Wichita economy, the world of finance, and postal economics. Experiences such as forecasting postal volumes and revenues, being involved in utility regulation, and teaching corporate finance have shaped his analysis.

Monday, October 30, 2006

The German Mittelstand and the Japanese Keiretsu were once lauded in the Economist and evangelized by management consultants as the powerhouses of international capitalism. These were held up as international paragons of economic virtue. The gurus proclaimed that the secret of economic success was not the slave to Anglo Saxon individualism and the sterile building blocks of economic theory. Here were genuine indigenous recipes for success that were not out of the bland cookbooks of neoclassical economics.

Yet time proved a cruel critic. Japan went into its long night's journey, the nerve rendering recession of the 1990s. Germany's Wunderkind economy suffered indigestion from absorbing the formerly communist East, then ate its way into Eurosclerosis.

Economic journalists are bitter when their stories prove false. Keiretsus and the Mittelstand have now become examples of what countries should avoid on the path to economic triumph. No kind word is now written of these discredited economic pariahs.

Not having invested any journalistic prestige into these two national economic phenomena, I find that both the German Mittelstand and the Japanese keiretsu were worthy institutions that were efficient and effective for their respective economies. Both had elements which could be properly emulated elsewhere. Both were victims of a common disease: demography.

Both economic phenomena were post World War II responses to the structure of their countries' capital markets when they faced the daunting task of rebuilding economies leveled by the wrath of Mars. Both had a common time bomb ticking from their creation. As the rebuilding generation aged, its vitality was sapped and it was not adequately replaced.

Wednesday, October 04, 2006

The Wichita Business Journal reports that the "Business conditions index turned down in Kansas."Do misinterpret the headline: this does not indicate that business is declining in Kansas. Creighton University economist Ernie Goss surveys supply chain management managers and reports how many are expecting production and other economic quantities are going to be higher. In September the overall index fell from 68.2 to 58.6 in August. The index also fell in August. How should you interpret that number? A reading of greater than 50 per cent means positive growth is expected. The September reading simply means this: those closest to the production progress expect continued growth, however, they are less sanguine than the very high readings of August and July indicated.