Dell Droid Gets Rejected

Rumors about a Dell Android Phone have been swirling since almost the inception of Android. Let’s look back on how the Dell Droid story has played out before we dive into the most recent plot twist of the saga:

That last rumor even cited the phone could have come as early as the following month, which to folks like us living in the future, is last month. As we know, there was no Dell Android Phone launched last month althought their COULD have been: Dell presented it to the carriers and it was rejected by everyone who got a look.

Ouch. That hurts. But Kaufman Bros. analyst Shaw Wu in a research note adds insult to injury saying the reason for the worldwide rejection was the phone’s were too… “Dell-like”. Dell Dude is gonna feel THAT in the morning.

Carriers reportedly knocked the 2 prototypes, which were the same phone with one running Windows Mobile and one running Android, saying they lacked differentiation. But Dell isn’t giving up:

That said, Wu writes that his sources believe Dell has not given up, and that “Dell remains committed to the cell phone space as it appreciates the opportunity in smart phones and the longer-term cannibalization potential of PCs.” He adds that “at the end of the day…PC vendors may have an advantage over traditional cell phone competitors as a smart phone is more PC than cell phone with all the computer functionality and voice as a commodity.” Wu notes that PC makers Acer, Asustek and Lenovo are all beefing up their smart phone offerings.

So now Dell heads back to the drawing board. But you have to wonder if they really “get it”. You can say that computer manufacturers have a huge advantage but I just don’t think that’s accurate. Mobile phones are an entirely different beast and if Dell got it so wrong on the first go round, why are they any more likely to get it right the second time when even more competitors have inevitably launched new phones?

Don’t get me wrong, I’d love to see Dell succeed in the Mobile market and with Android in particular… but you have to wonder if they’re creative and capable enough without the help of company that has already seen success in mobile. Thankfully, the article says they’re contemplating acquisitions to help in this effort. Do whatever it takes to bring us something innovative, dude!

Featured

Allow everyone to be able to buy it, at a reasonable price. Why the carriers have to decide that?

solid

maybe it was rejected because it was too good. Imagine a phone with bittorrent, skype, wifi tether, etc. I can see t-mobile saying um no. We don’t need that on our network.

Gil

@Solid

Wouldnt most of that be software based? As it stands I know my G1 cant wifi tether (at least without root) within the standard paramaters of the android os, so I dont think thats the case. If the hardware was “too good”, I would imagine the opposite

reasonable prices would be impossible without carrier subsidization… and the carriers have to decide which phones they want to subsidize, because they’d go for broke pretty quick otherwise. CDMA phones have to be customized to work with specific networks..which costs the network money and effort. If they are going to customize a phone for their own network (plan, code, debug, release, etc) then sell the device for less than they paid the factory, they have every right to be selective. This is why unlocked GSM phones cost an arm and a leg.

That said, I do personally enjoy unlocked/open phones. But carrier selectivity is something reasonably acceptable.