Sylvie,
My apologies! I accidentally sent you the working group response to a
different comment. Here is the response that should have been sent:
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We are simplifying the
paragraph and providing an example:
Sufficient techniques are provided in a numbered list where each list
item provides the technique or combination of techniques that can be
used to meet the Success Criterion. When there are multiple techniques
on a numbered list item connected by "AND" then all of the techniques
must be used.
For example, Situation B in Understanding Success Criterion 2.2.1
lists as the third sufficient technique:
SCR16: Providing a script that warns the user a time limit is about
to expire (Scripting) AND SCR1: Allowing the user to extend the
default time limit (Scripting)
So both SCR16 and SCR1 must be used to satisfy this success criterion.
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Loretta Guarino Reid
<lorettaguarino@google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Â <sylvie.duchateau@accessiweb.org> wrote:
>>
>> Name: Sylvie Duchateau
>> Email: sylvie.duchateau@accessiweb.org
>> Affiliation: Association BrailleNet
>> Document: TD
>> Item Number: (none selected)
>> Part of Item: Applicability
>> Comment Type: editorial
>> Summary of Issue: Text that is difficult to understand. Needs to be simplified and may be have an illustrative example.
>> Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
>> Location : introduction of Techniques for WCAG 2.0 and Understanding WCAG 2.0, Heading h3 "sufficient techniques".
>> paragraph added on July 2010 draft.
>>
>> "[Begin add] In some cases it's only when a combination
>> of techniques are used that it is considered sufficient. In these cases, the sufficient combination of techniques are listed together on one numbered line
>>
>> in the â€œHow to Meet WCAG 2.0â€