Othello's Ethnicity

Was Othello of African or Arabic descent?In the famous play Othello by William Shakespeare the topic of Othello’s ethnicity is a very widely discussed topic. Most people get to the, in my opinion, erroneous conclusion that Othello was of sub-Sahara African descent (black). The opposing point of view’s position is that he was of Arabic, or North African descent, which as I will attempt to explain throughout this paper is, in my opinion, correct.

The main points people who believe that he was black use is that quite simply throughout the play he is called black a number of times, and he is also called thick lipped once, and moors don’t have thick lips. He mentions he was a slave, and at the people who were slaves were the West Africans not the Arabs.

A little before Shakespeare’s time queen Elisabeth had started to make the distinction between the fair Europeans and the “blackmoors” which was supposed to be a way to classify the people from North Africa but it was really just a way to classify anyone from anywhere in Africa. She started trading these “blackmoors” as slaves. And we know for sure that at least one of these shipments of “blackmoors” was composed completely of people from West Africa, in fact they were Spanish slaves stolen by England. So the term black started being used for the “blackmoors” as well as the West Africans (because of their skin color). All this went on while England traded goods and interacted with the Moroccans or North Africans (Bartels, pg 148-150). So even though the moors obviously had a better standing in Europe than the West Africans they still could have been captured and sold as slaves. So Othello could perfectly have been a slave at some point in his life. And it only makes sense that he would be able to walk away after running away if he was a moor, because a black person would not be able to walk free, only a moor would. Moors were able to walk free in Europe and this is why Queen Elisabeth felt she needed to put this barrier of color between Europeans and the rest of the darker world. (Bartels 148-150). The last problem that I already presented was that Othello was called thick lipped, and North Africans don’t have thick lips. And this too is part of the people’s ignorance; the term “black” is just a way to differentiate those who are not European (Neill, pg 368). Proof of this ignorance is that people actually believed the wild stories about Africa to be true. Stories like some involving people whose heads grew under their shoulders and others like that (Neill, pg 362). This ignorance was not in the least the people’s fault, the only ways they had of knowing what was outside of their city is to hear the stories of the people who came from outside the city. These were the stories they brought, but if they were confused about people with heads growing under their shoulders they certainly did not know the difference between a moor and a thick lipped black from West Africa. And as we can see from the stories of people with no heads which Othello tells Desdemona about, we can see that Shakespeare knows of the people’s ignorance and uses it to get their interest. Therefore “thick lipped” is just another one of the many things Shakespeare uses to catch the audiences attention without much regard for it actually being accurate since people were very ignorant and they did not know about it anyway.

To support this we might also say that the only ones who call Othello black are the ones that are trying to put him down and himself at the end when he is feeling worse every second about himself. Blackness in Othello in general represents evil and bad things in general. At that time black people were also considered less; to tell someone that he is black is to degrade him. When Othello is called thick lipped it is just a very well known feature that people from West Africa have, and to call him that is the same as calling him black just stronger, and with more weight, because it is like...

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

...﻿1. EthnicityEthnicity is not a clear-cut term. It usually describes someone’s racial or cultural background but has a whole host of other connotations connected with appearance, dress, food, lifestyle etc. The ethnic majority in a particular place are, not necessarily those with the largest numbers, but those with social and political power. It is also the case that often terms describing race are fairly meaningless. People from the ‘British race’ for example originate from many other cultures and countries, depending on how far back you trace their family trees.
2. Prejudiced language
Language can be used to make certain ethnic groups appear to be outsiders, or different from the ethnic majority.
Markedness
It is often assumed that immigrants, and people from ethnic minorities, must fit in with the ways and traditions of the ethnic majority. When this happens, the ethnic identity of the majority begins to appear normal and invisible, whilst that of the minority appears, strange, worthy of mention and marked. We often find in the media that people’ ethnicity is only mentioned when they are not white. So, we hear things like “the murdered black teenager Steven Lawrence” even in instances where the description of ethnicity is irrelevant.
Negative labelling
People are often labelled according to their colour, race or ethnicity. The problem with such labels is firstly that they may stop us seeing...

...Using the data in the table provided, what can you say about the ethnicity of the population in the national parks of England and Wales.
There are 5 main ethnic groups and 18 sub groups represented in table 1. Using the data in the table provided you can see that the majority of people who use the national parks of England and Wales are white - English, with other - black being the least amount of people to use the national parks.
From the table you can see Northumberland national park is the least visited park with only 1,993 people visiting the majority being white English people visiting, only a few white irish, white and black Caribbean, other white, other mixed, Pakistani, Chinese, other Asian, African and Arab people visiting and no people from the following subgroups visit this national park, white gypsy, white and black African, white and Asian, Indian, Bangladeshi, Caribbean, other black and any other ethnic group.
However South Downs national park has the highest amount of visitors, the majority again being white English and the least amount being other black.
The ethnic group white English is the highest population visiting the 13 national parks of England and Wales with 382,731 people from this ethnic group and other black being the minority with only 94 people.
To conclude while this table gives us a good idea of the collective identities of people who visit national parks it does not go into the reasoning behind the information, it is...

...ETH 125: Quiz 4 *Ethnicity and Religion*
**Please highlight the correct answer. Once completed, save and rename the file with your first name and then upload to the Assignment tab which is due next Sunday.**
The following materials are based on Schaefer’s Chapter 5: Ethnicity and Religion
1. The largest ancestral group of European Americans is
a. French.
b. Irish.
c. German.
d. Norwegian.
2. Which of the following groups has always been considered White by the English?
a. Italians.
b. Germans.
c. Swedes.
d. none of these
3. The principle of third-generation interest states that
a. the grandchildren of the original immigrants would have an increased interest in their ethnicity.
b. the grandchildren of the original immigrants would have a decreased interest in their ethnicity.
c. the children of immigrants would have more of an interest in their ethnicity than their children.
d. none of these
4. Race is
a. biological.
b. socially constructed.
c. phenotypical.
d. important only to Whites.
5. A group of _____ were sent to internment camps in Montana during World War II.
a. Canadian Americans
b. Italian Americans
c. Columbian Americans
d. Japanese Americans
6. The continuing portrayal of Italian Americans as gangsters is an example of
a. ethnocentrism.
b....

...Ethnicity and the Immigrant Experience
When thinking about immigration, most individuals imagine all different types of ethnic groups traveling to a separate land away from their own. Most imagine America. Immigration, throughout history, has occurred within all types of ethnicities. When taking a closer look at the individuals living in America, it is apparent that everyone is not exactly like one another. Assimilation becomes a popular word used when discussing migration, and both positives and negatives come along with it. Two theorists that discuss the meaning of assimilation in their writings are Stephen Steinberg in his book, Ethnic Myth, and Milton Gordon in his book Assimilation in American Life. They discuss issues regarding assimilation and how they affect the nation as a whole. A novel written by Chang-Rae Lee titled, Native Speaker, gives specific examples as to how the assimilation process affects others and the migrants themselves, as also described in both Steinberg and Gordon’s books.
In Steinberg’s book, Ethnic Myth, he discusses with his readers the issues regarding ethnic identity and assimilation. This is presented and explained in the chapter titled, The Atrophy of Ethnic Cultures. He first talks about the idea of the “melting pot” and how it should not be analyzed lightly. He gives a quote from John Higham that says, “Loud assertions of pluralism almost invariably betray fears of assimilation” (Steinberg, 59)....

...The Future of Ethnicity in America
This paper will examine the future of ethnicity in America by answering three appealing questions. First, how does symbolic ethnicity enter into contemporary American racial and ethnic relations? Second, why might immigrant youths choose to assimilate to the culture of low-income, inner-city youths instead of white middle-class culture? Lastly, why do some cases of interethnic contact generate conflict and others do not?
Symbolic ethnicity is a term coined by Herbert Gans. It refers to ethnicity that is individualistic in nature and without real social cost for the individual. These symbolic identifications are essentially leisure time activities, rooted in nuclear family traditions reinforced by voluntary enjoyable aspects for being ethnic (Gans 424-429). Symbolic ethnicity arises “as the functions of ethnic cultures and groups diminish and identity becomes the primary way of being ethnic” (Gans 1985:434). Gans predicted that this form of ethnicity may easily persist into the fifth and sixth generations and beyond (Dale, and Romo 441).
People are less and less interested in their ethnic cultures and organizations and are instead more concerned with maintaining their ethnic identity, with the feeling of being Jewish or Italian or Polish, and with finding ways of feeling and expressing that identity in suitable ways. Identity here...

...of African society. According to Elbadawi and Sambanis, (2000, p. 6) ‘‘this inference seems self-evident to many, given that African rebel movements almost always are ethnically defined. Ethnic identities and hatred are thus seen as the cause of violent conflict”. There is also a belief that people’s perception of how they differ in terms of their ethnic and religious identity as opposed to that of others with whom they have a relationship may lead to conflict (MacFarlane, 1999, p. 26). It is a fact that many African countries including Ghana have pronounced religious fragmentation and/or multiple ethnic cleavages that either triggers violence or sustains it once it has started. In a paper that sought to identify the role Religion and ethnicity played in civil wars in Africa, Haynes (2007) indicates from his tabulation of civil wars and armed conflicts in Africa from 1963 to 2005notes that, “17 African countries have to accommodate significant ethnic and religious fragmentation.” However he is makes it unequivocally clear that the data does not conclusively indicate that ethnic and/or religious fragmentation in a country leads to violence.
On June 11, 2012, it was reported in almost every media that communal violence has once again broken in Ghana. According to the reports violent clashes broke out between the indigenes of the Gbi Traditional in the Volta Region of Ghana and some youths from Hohoe-Zongo, a community of settler’s from Northern Ghana and...

...﻿ Why ask yourself what is diversity? Or What is culture? Diversity and culture are two words in which that even if the definition is not understood or known, these two words are all around us, and we are very much involved in each daily. Diversity is nothing more than differences among all humans. According to "Luther College" (2014) diversity describes the similarities and differences that people have. Diversity has territorial differences and similarities in their thoughts and identities among different institutions and individuals who make up the majority of the community. Diversity includes important dimensions of their identity for example; race, ethnicity, gender, nationality, citizenship, religion, sexual orientation, and age. To understand these differences it is extremely important in the prediction of any one individual's values, choices or responses. (Diversity Center) Diversity is important to the growth of our society but, it can also lead to violence and hatred toward individuals. Even with these listed above, diversity is also valued because, it allows us to learn from the individual differences within us all. In reality, we have to value diversity so that we are capable of
working together for the good within our country and our world.
According to "Dictionary.com" (2014), ethnocentrism is the tendency to believe that certain ethnic or cultural groups are of the most importance, any other group or groups would be viewed in relation to that...

...no strong and coherent force that radically opposes the notion of
federalism, but the principles of federalism are more complicated.
The Nature of Federalism
The three main parties (Maoists/UCPN-M, UML and Nepali Congress) have agreed on
nine founding principles for establishing provinces. Five of these are identity-oriented,
referring to ethnic and cultural ties, and four of these are capability oriented, referring to
administrative and financial ability. By and large, the fact that the predominant number of
principles refer to identity, has coined the mode of federalism in Nepal as ethnic
federalism. Ethnic federalism, however, is slightly misleading as some of the principles
adhere to the wider notion of identity rather than ethnicity. Despite this semantic
discrepancy, this study will use the commonly applied term of ethnic federalism to denote
the federalism proposed in Nepal.
Interpretation of the nine principles ranges, resulting in different parties arguing for a
different number of states. This comes largely as a result from the vast cultural diversity
that is found in Nepal with its 59 recognized indigenous peoples (IPs).16 These groups have
their separate cultural heritage, language and traditions, and fall under what ILO 169
consider an indigenous group with rights to self-determination. Inevitably, this has led to a
14 Interview with a community leader working with reconciliation, 10 March 2011, Kathmandu Valley.
15 Interview...