As Seen in Vanity Fair's August 2006 Issue!
As Seen in US News & World Report's September 11 Fifth Anniversary Issue!
As Seen in Time Magazine's September 11, 2006 Issue!
As Seen in Phoenix New Times' August 9, 2007 Issue!

Friday, April 19, 2013

Boston Marathon Bombing Suspect #2: 9-11 Truther

Well, I wish I could say this was a surprise, but we've seen it so often now that it's become somewhat routine:

A cached profile photo
that matches his picture, and tweets from other users he's interacted
with suggest that this is the twitter account of 19-year-old Dzhokhar A.
Tsarnaev, the fugitive suspect #2 in the Boston Marathon bombings: @J_tsar. The account is listed under the name "Jahar," which is what classmates called him because his full name was hard to pronounce.

The younger Boston Marathon bombing suspect seemed more interested in
blunts than bombs while in college in Massachusetts, his classmate told
POLITICO on Friday.
“He didn’t seem like a dangerous person at
all,” said Chris Barry, a sophomore at UMass-Dartmouth, who became
friends with Dzhokhar Tsarnaev — now a bombing suspect — on their first
day of school. “He was a pothead, a normal pothead. I couldn’t even
imagine him being mad at someone, let alone hurting someone.”

Kilzer also claims that the mother's beliefs increasingly made her
uncomfortable, which partially led to her ceasing to visit Tsarnaeva in
2012:

"She started quoting conspiracy theories, telling me that
she thought 9-11 was purposefully created by the American government to
make America hate muslims. “It’s real,” she said, “My son knows all
about it. You can read on the internet.” I have to say I felt kind of
scared and vulnerable when she said this, as I am distinctly American,
and was lying practically naked in her living room."

An aunt of the men suspected of carrying out Monday’s bombing of the
Boston Marathon on Friday said that she had a hunch that the FBI may
have staged a photo of her nephews at the scene of the crime, and she
also had doubts about the official story behind the terrorist attacks on
Sept. 11, 2001.
Speaking to reporters at her home in Toronto, Maret Tsarnaeva told
reporters that she had contacted the FBI after seeing photos and video
that the agency released of 19-year-old Dzhokhar A. Tsarnaev and
26-year-old Tamerlan Tsarnaev because she strongly believed that they
could not have committed the crime.

I don't think we have ever said that the truther movement has called for violence. In fact I have several times said that their activity level is so low they act as if they don't really believe their own claims. Most truthers can't even get past posting a few youtube videos. Lets face it, they are too lazy and stupid to lead a violent revolution.

The phenomenon that is happening, however, is that in the giant Venn diagram that is life truthers and crazy violent paranoid psychotic people who believe in fringe theories share a lot of the same space.

The phenomenon that is happening, however, is that in the giant Venn diagram that is life truthers and crazy violent paranoid psychotic people who believe in fringe theories share a lot of the same space.

Not to mention that in order to be a truther, or to be the kind of person who bombs the Boston Marathon, you have to be a weirdo who doesn't fit in with normal people.

I mean, look at who ends up in the truth movement: losers with no job, or no friends, or no romantic relationships (or in Brian Good's case, all of the above).

I was just wondering what Richard Gage would be thinking right now, to see the same idiots that believe the 9/11 conspiracy crap, believe all the shitty conspiracies that have come out after the bombing in Boston. And that one of the suspects believes in a 9/11 inside job.

When in doubt of 1 of their own killing innocent people with guns or bombs the Twoofers secretly and covertly cover up any kind of relationship with the known felons and distance themselves from them to make it look like the person was a lone assassin.

Kind of ironic wouldn't you say? They say we cover up things and lie and then they don't believe in the lone assassins.

Just think, there are 300 questions asked by the widows, and only 27 of them were answered, but rather than work to get the remaining 273 questions answered, Brian would rather just spam this blog with 3rd-grade name-calling of M. Gregory Ferris and GuitarBill. It's sad, really.

Actually, I was banned from Truthaction when Cosmos learned that I'm a sex predator. In fact, it's common knowledge that I tried to sexually harass a fellow troofer who happens to also be a married woman. I guess my twisted bisexual fantasies about a menage a trois involving myself, Carol Brouillet and William Rodriguez turned Carol's stomach. That's when Carol informed her husband about my sexual advances. Needless to say, her husband threatened to rip my head off and shit down my neck if I ever spoke to his wife again.

Yes, I'm a twisted fuck.

After all, I look at a man's hairy ass and think to myself, "you know I'd like to fuck that."

BTW, Brian's behavior since returning here is really bizarre (more so than normal, I mean). My guess is the judge ordered him back on medication after this latest brush with the law, and now Brian's acting all giddy as a side effect of the psychiatric drugs he's on.

There has been no challenge in the scientific community to the consensus on 9/11

What makes you think there's a consensus on 9/11? Since 40 of architects and engineers for truth are PhD engineers, their opinions that the investigations are inadequate can hardly been seen as a lack of challenge.

There has been no challenge to the 1886 architects and engineers calling for new investigations. For you to claim that 1886 architects and engineers making a challenge is no challenge, and then argue that the lack of challenge to the architects and engineers is only proof that their assertions are silly, that shows you to be employing different standards.

You can watch the DVD free online.

How do you know the engineers have not investigated the issues? How do you think they arrived at their opinions that the official investigations were inadequate?

You have no idea what I do every day, Lian, and for you to pretend to knowledge you can not possibly have only shows you for a fool.

The fact that only liars and lunatics have challenged the official reports suggests a consensus.

Since 40 of architects and engineers for truth are PhD engineers, their opinions that the investigations are inadequate can hardly been seen as a lack of challenge.

So provide us with the papers they've submitted that challenge the consensus.

There has been no challenge to the 1886 architects and engineers calling for new investigations.

That's because nobody cares about them. If 9/11 truth were something that a large number of people believed, like creationism, you'd likely see rebuttals of it from reputable scientists. Since it's a tiny crackpot cult, nobody bothers to refute it.

You can watch the DVD free online.

Nobody cares.

How do you know the engineers have not investigated the issues? How do you think they arrived at their opinions that the official investigations were inadequate?

Please provide their papers that outline their opinions that the official investigations were inadequate.

You have no idea what I do every day, Lian, and for you to pretend to knowledge you can not possibly have only shows you for a fool.

So to sum up, there are no scientific challenges to the consensus on 9/11. There's just the hysterical squealing of a failed janitor and liar who lives with his parents and has a hideous homeless mullet.

Robert Regl, PhD EngineerLic: MS, UT retired BS and MS in Civil Engineering and a PhD in Engineering Mechanics. I have worked as a structural analyst in the offshore oil industry and as a viscoelastic materials expert working on the redesign of the Solid Rocket Boosters following the Challenger disaster. I have also been on the engineering faculties of the University of Illinois (1967-1970) and Mississippi State University (1970-1980).

I used to think you were about the only honest poster in the forum (aside from me).

Brian, you're not honest. You're a pathetic liar. You lie when you claim you're not petgoat. You lie when you claim you weren't banned from the truth movement for stalking Carol Brouillet. You lie when you say you didn't run away squealing and crying from debate challenges from Rodriguez and Ranke.

At least you were telling the truth when you said that you failed out of San Jose State.

Oh, so you claim that the experience and training of our PhDs is irrelevant when you can't name anyone who has relevant experience and training.

Like Lian, you employ differing standards for your evidence than you impose on our evidence--and you change the subject to me when I show that your claims were absurd about the qualifications of the PhD Engineers for Truth.

Dr. Robert T. Mote PhD, Structural Engineer+20 years experience in structural design. Special interest in dynamic and explosion behaviour of structural elements and foundations.

Ibrahim R. Soudy, PhD,PE,SE,PEng.License #: C 66076, S 4876 CA, C&S 39805 WA, C& S 74895PE OR28 years of combined academic and practical experience in the design and evaluation of bridges, buildings, offshore, marine and materials handling structures. The topics of his graduate research work are in Earthquake Engineering, Structural Dynamics, and Soil-Structure Interaction. He worked on projects in the U.S., Canada, South America, Europe, Russia, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia including Design-Build-Finance-Operate projects. He has lectured at UBC on bridge seismic design. Dr. Soudy is a registered Professional Engineer and Structural Engineer in the states of California, Washington, Oregon, Guma, and British Columbia.

Your belief that there is a scientific consensus about 9/11 is absurd. You can't provide any evidence for that. Your belief that there are no scientific challenges to the official version of events is also absurd.