The Future of Consumerist

Over the last twelve years, Consumerist has been a steadfast proponent and voice on behalf of consumers, from exposing shady practices by secretive cable companies to pushing for action against dodgy payday lenders. Now, we’re joining forces with Consumer Reports, our parent organization, to cultivate the next generation of consumer advocacy.

Stay tuned as Consumerist’s current and future content finds its home as a part of the Consumer Reports brand. In the meantime, you can access existing Consumerist content below, and we encourage you to visit Consumer Reports to read the latest consumer news.

U.S. Bankruptcy Court judge Mary Walrath may be a new folk hero. She’s the judge handling the Sports Authority case, and today she ruled that four Sports Authority executives will not receive a combined $2.85 million in bonuses that the company claims are incentives. Incentives for running the company into the ground?

Sports Authority couldn’t find a buyer for its stores in bankruptcy, and 14,000 people across the country have lost their jobs as the chain concludes its going out of business sales and finally closes down. Some of those people have apparently contacted the bankruptcy court, and Judge Walrath wants them to know that she got the message.

“Quite frankly, I’m not surprised the employees are sending angry emails,” she told the court during a hearing today. The argument in favor of the bonuses was that the payments were incentive payments coming from the lenders.

One of those incentives was to keep “shrinkage” down, or make sure that employees and shoplifters didn’t make off with the liquidation merchandise. Isn’t that the store managers’ job? Maybe they should have split the $2.85 million instead.

Judge Walrath wasn’t having it, following a trend in bankruptcy court of not granting big bonuses to executives. “I think it’s just inappropriate to pay senior executives bonuses when all the employees are losing their jobs,” she said during the hearing.