I can’t disagree overly much with a number of media folk who are criticizing Trump as offering bizarre remarks following his meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Ultimately, the ONLY thing Russia, or for that matter China or North Korea or anyone else, respects is raw American power and the willingness to ruthlessly deploy that arsenal of economic, diplomatic and military power to achieve our objectives and get these nations to abandon their objectives as not worth the price they will pay.

For the record, the Democratic Party has made that tactic entirely impossible. Because any foreign thug leader surveying the American political landscape sees nothing but a divided United States with a fanatic opposition fanatically opposed to its own president. Donald Trump cannot operate from any genuine position of strength and our enemies know it. The ally of Putin and every other dictator on earth is the Democratic Party, because they want our worst enemies to succeed rather than to give Trump ANY victory or potential claim of victory.

Let me put it this way: the Democrats are basically screaming that if Trump doesn’t declare World War III and send our entire arsenal of nukes blasting off toward Russia, he must be a Russian puppet. But of course if he does anything like that, the same people who demand war will blame Trump for going to the war that they demanded he initiate to retaliate for this “election meddling.” It’s actually truly insane.

Democrats – and their media allies who are propagandists rather than “journalists” due to their bias and due to their agenda of helping one side with its narratives while attacking and freezing the other side with negative narratives – are declaring that President Trump shouldn’t meet or even be allowed to meet with the Russian president; notwithstanding that every single American president from FDR during WWII on have routinely met with the Russians even in the very worst days of the Cold War. Because both sides realized we need to have top-level executive dialogue with the other greatest nuclear power on the face of the earth. When Democrats are trying to weaken Trump to the point where he can’t even have a meeting, there is no question that a Putin will smell that division and the weakness that is created by that division and act like a bad player.

Democrats are screaming in rage that Trump wants to have some kind of positive relationship with Russia. Let’s contrast that with these Democrat hypocrites when Obama was running for re-election and in one of his debates with Mitt Romney – after Romney declared that Russia was America’s “number one geopolitical foe” – arrogantly lectured Romney with these words:

OBAMA: “Governor Romney, I’m glad that you recognize that al-Qaeda’s a threat because a few months ago when you were asked, what’s the biggest geopolitical threat facing America, you said Russia – not al-Qaeda, you said Russia. And the 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because, you know, the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.” (Barack Obama, 2012 Presidential Debate , Boca Raton, FL, 10/22/12)

Remember, to be a Democrat is to be the very worst form of hypocrite imaginable. According to every single damn Democrat today – if these roaches were capable of any kind of honesty or decency – Obama was not only an incompetent moron who was clearly unfit to be president, and clearly who should have been impeached rather than re-elected, but he was also just as clearly a puppet of Vladimir Putin. We have to ask what it was that Putin had on Obama that he would say something that by current standards was so treasonous when the Republican candidate stated

In his final press briefing in 2017, President Barack Obama was asked about whether he could have done or said more about the Russian hacking that happened on his watch. Obama said:

“It’s not like Putin’s going around the world publicly saying ‘look what we did wasn’t that clever.’ He denies it. So the idea somehow that public shaming is gonna be effective I think doesn’t read the thought process in Russia very well.”

Obama said Putin denies it. There’s no point screaming about it. We need to move on. Which is to say that Trump didn’t take any tone during his “infamous” meeting with Putin that Obama hadn’t taken.

“There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig America’s elections, there’s no evidence that that has happened in the past or that it will happen this time, and so I’d invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and make his case to get votes,”

For the sake of history, allow me to point out that EVERY SINGLE ACT OF RUSSIAN ELECTION MEDDLING OCCURRED UNDER BARACK OBAMA’S WATCH, UNDER HILLARY CLINTON’S WATCH, UNDER JOHN BRENNAN’S WATCH, UNDER JAMES CLAPPER’S WATCH, UNDER JAMES COMEY’S WATCH. Obama said to stop whining about election interference.

And Democrats have been not merely whining, but hysterically crying like babies thrown into boiling water ever since.

The hypocrisy of it all. This psychosis of rabid hypocrisy simply has to stop.

I still remember how every single Democrat and every single “news reporter” yawned as Barack Obama in a hot mic moment actually told the stooge sitting in for President-for-life Vladimir Putin that “After my election I’ll have more flexibility.”

Why the hell was it okay for Obama to literally get caught on VIDEO telling Vladimir Putin how “flexible” he would be in giving Russia and Putin what they wanted but so evil for Trump to do nothing that even pales in comparison with Obama’s “I’ll be your willing slave if you just allow me to be president again” moment???

Pardon me for shrugging when these Democrats who pulled all this fascist, anti-American, Russian-colluding crap now say that Donald Trump who has done nothing even CLOSE to these roaches ought to be investigated and castigated.

You really have to marvel at the rabid hypocrisy of the Democratic Party and the willingness of the mainstream media to follow the Joseph Goebbels Ministry of Propaganda model for Democrats.

But when the hell did this start happening??? What caused it???

Take a trip down memory lane to the days just before and during the period when the Democratic Party began to turn truly evil and truly anti-American.

IN ONLY TWO BRIEF YEARS -1964 and 1965 – Lyndon B. Johnson did more to advance the cause of black Americans than any American President since Abraham Lincoln, and initiated a program for the enrichment of American life as revolutionary and far-reaching as the New Deal. ”We are entering a new era of good feeling,” pontificated The Washington Post in 1964, ”and Lyndon Johnson is the gargantuan figure making it all possible.”

Maybe it was because this giant civil rights accomplishments were advanced largely through cooperation with the Republican Party:

And he pointed out that his own party was growing toxic right out from under him as it betrayed the United States of America for a decidedly anti-American communist ideology that had put the United States “in more danger” “from these left-wing influences” “than we’ve ever been in” and said “and they’re working in my party from within.” That’s the DEMOCRATIC Party, mind you:

“We just had hell [with] these college students…I’ve had Hoover in after them… They marched here, and we arrested 600 of them, and we gave 29 of them pretty rough times. We found most of them were mentally diseased. Hoover’s taken 256 that turned in supposedly their draft cards…So you’re dealing with mental problems…I think we talk too damn much about civil liberties and constitutional rights of the individual and not enough about the rights of the masses…I think your government’s in trouble, general…I think it’s—I don’t want to say this–but I think we’re in more danger from these left-wing influences now than we’ve ever been in the thirty-seven years I’ve been here. And they’re working in my party from within.”—Lyndon Johnson as recorded in a telephone conversation with former President Dwight Eisenhower, October 1967. From Episode Five of The Vietnam War.

”Why, that draft protest last week that got everyone so excited. According to the F.B.I. report, out of the 256 who were supposed to have burned their draft cards, a substantial number were crazy people who had a previous history in mental institutions. . . . One of our informants in the Communist Party . . . reported that the Communists decided to do all they could to encourage demonstrations against the draft.”

Johnson removed his hand from his wife’s grasp, leaned forward, the intensity returning: ”Now I don’t want to be like a McCarthyite. But this country is in a little more danger than we think. And someone has to uncover this information.” — LBJ, in conversation with his wife as reported by the New York Times, August 21, 1988

LBJ, as reported from that same that same New York Times article;

”It’s all a few intellectuals and columnists,” Johnson confided to a few members of the White House staff sitting with him in the Oval Office. ”The people loved me, and they believed in me. You just go down to the White House basement. You’ll see them. Boxes full of letters, all praising me for doing the right thing. They spread the doubt – every morning I wake up and see another column attacking me, or some professor on television. Naturally, people get confused with all these voices shouting and hollering about how awful I am.

And:

”Not just in the press. I was always getting advice from my top advisers after they had been in contact with someone in the Communist world. Hell, you can always find Dobrynin’s car” -Anatoly F. Dobrynin, then Soviet Ambassador – ”in front of a columnist’s house the night before he blasts me on Vietnam.”

The New York Times attempts to frame LBJ as a man who lost his way and frankly went crazy, but you keep reading and watch how totally right this man who did more for genuine civil rights than ANY Democrat had ever done before or has ever done since truly was.

History records that the Democratic Party rabidly turned on LBJ in a way that would have stunned rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth dogs. LBJ saw it developing, watched helplessly as the communist influence extended further and further into his own party that he loved and had invested his life and career advancing, but was powerless to stop it. Until the rabid fringe metastasized into a powerful enough cancer to destroy its own president.

History records that the 1968 Democratic Party National Convention was one of the ugliest, most anti-American events in American political history. Even the reliably leftist Washington Post said: “The 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago was an infamous, violent, unprecedented disaster.” Democrats were violently rioting in American cities and on college campuses. Much the same damn treasonous way they are now. And the riots have the same rabidly leftist and frankly COMMUNIST point of origin that LBJ correctly identified and as a decent American was horrified by.

the Vietnam War stands as the absolute nadir of American military history. That war has scarred and in Obama’s words “fundamentally transformed” every single American war effort ever since. Because every single enemy we have since had knows that all they have to do is somehow hold out for as long as possible, because it is simply a fact that it is now in the DNA of Democrats to betray America and side with the worst enemies of humanity in the history of the world. There is absolutely no question that the Democratic Party politically manufactured and caused our defeat in the Vietnam War in which American troops never lost so much as a single battle. Democrats sided with the communists because that is what they themselves have become, and divided America against itself, and in Lincoln’s words which were a quote from Jesus’ words, “a house divided against itself cannot stand.” And so every single enemy we have fought since knows as a fact that the Democratic Party will ultimately betray America, betray their own warriors, betray their own people, and create a military defeat. And so quagmire after quagmire has occurred as a result of the hope and confidence that Democrats have instilled in all the worst enemies of humanity.

LBJ saw this rabid, Democratic Party communist hate rising and spreading and beginning to take over his own party from within, but he couldn’t stop the hate from rising. Because he also saw how the hate was groomed and skillfully propagandized by the mainstream media and by the university faculties.

And that’s were we are today, folks. And that’s where Donald Trump is today.

Washington (CNN)Former US intelligence chiefs expressed astonishment and condemnation Monday in response to President Donald Trump’s comments at Monday’s news conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin, with former CIA Director John Brennan calling the US President’s performance “nothing short of treasonous.”

Following his one-on-one meeting with Putin in Helsinki, Finland, Trump declined to endorse the US intelligence community’s assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 election over Putin’s denial, saying the Russian President was “extremely strong and powerful” in his denial.

“Donald Trump’s press conference performance in Helsinki rises to & exceeds the threshold of ‘high crimes & misdemeanors.’ It was nothing short of treasonous,” Brennan, a frequent critic of Trump who served as CIA chief from 2013 through January 2017, tweeted during the event. “Not only were Trump’s comments imbecility, he is wholly in the pocket of Putin. Republican Patriots: Where are you???”

Really, all I need is John Brennan to prove that Donald Trump most definitely should NOT trust “US Intelligence” given the infiltration by Obama communist ideologues into the deep bowels of our once American intelligence apparatus.

Speaking of outright sedition, another Democrat actually called for a military coup:

Democrat Steve Cohen tried to walk it back, saying “When I called for the military to step in and stop Trump I wasn’t suggesting a coup.” Really? What the hell else WERE you suggesting, you demonic liar??? We are talking about the Democratic Party going rabid batpoop psychotic to the point of both sedition and treason. Just like the same wicked political party did in the days of Lincoln when they went so rabidly full of hate toward a Republican president named Lincoln they actually abandoned the United States and declared war against her. And waged that war with a rabid hate that stunned the world. These Democrats are the exact same wicked lunatics now.

“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office – that there’s no way he gets elected – but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk,” Strzok texted in August 2016. “It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

There is absolutely no legitimate or reasonable question at this point that there is in fact a “deep state” that is out to destroy Donald Trump and we also know that this deep state includes and involves numerous former Obama appointees to the U.S. intelligence establishment and in fact many faceless bureaucrats like Strzok and Page who are just radically leftist unionized roaches using their power to attack, to stall, to illegitimately “whistleblow” to reveal scandals that they themselves manufactured to target Trump appointees.

As an example, the FBI agents who interviewed Trump official Lt. Gen Michael Flynn stated that they saw absolutely no indications that Flynn had lied. But somehow the same FBI that refused to hand down ONE indictment in the 72 people who committed multiple serious felonies covering up the Hillary Clinton scandal still nailed Lt. Gen. Flynn to the wall like a bug for “lying to the FBI.”

All of this is deep state, deep state, DEEP STATE, DEEP STATE. It is treason and sedition against our nation, our Constitution, our American people. And Democrats have proven in their rabid defense that they are entirely involved in this treason and sedition.

We now know that basis of this “investigation” was tainted by a “dossier” that rival political candidate Hillary Clinton paid a foreign agent to get from the very Russia they claim Trump colluded with, which amounts to Democratic collusion with Russia to destroy an opponent. We now know that the dossier is filled with so many factual falsehoods that it is beyond unreal. We now know that the FBI and our oh-so-trustworthy-and-reliable intelligence community somehow never once questioned regarding the information or the source of that information.

Independence Days celebrates the first move toward driving out the British, Cinco de Mayo celebrates the Mexicans driving out the French.

We’ve got a problem. We’re being invaded right now today.

I watched with great interest a program focusing on Mao’s Cultural Revolution which resulted in the deaths on untold millions and likely tens of millions. Mao’s leftist policies had failed so blatantly and so appallingly – some 50 million perished of starvation during his so-called “Great Leap Forward” – that the top Communist party leadership realized that this fool needed to be bypassed for the sake of the nation. But Mao was a totally self-serving tyrant, rather than a leader who gave a flying damn about his own people. He was completely wiling to launch a bloodbath that would burn half of his nation to the ground if he could rule the other half. Mao had lost control of his own government, but not his power to poison with his propaganda. Claiming that current Communist leaders were taking the party, and China itself, in the wrong direction, Mao called on the nation’s youth to purge the “impure” elements of Chinese society and revive the revolutionary spirit. He basically authorized children to torture and murder their own parents, school children to torture and murder their own teachers and professors, and so on. The Red Guard were everywhere, torturing and killing and burning. It was a ten year long bloodbath the entire purpose of which was to restore Mao’s fanatic hold over a society that would have found the setting of Orwell’s “1984” a peaceful, serene place.

The point that I am making is that you ought to consider that today’s Democrats are truly no different in their poisonous, completely selfish and self-centered spirit than Chairman Mao. Like Mao, the Democrats are dictatorial demagogues who truly do not care about anything but their own power and their own raw political self-interests. And they will do whatever is necessary to achieve their ends no matter how destructive are the means. And to liberals, being that they have no God as the transcendent source for morality or genuine ethics that come from morality, the ends always justify the means. We’ve already seen nascent versions of the Red Guard from our own communist left: the Tea Party never had one riot, never got so much as one ticket, let alone had one of their own arrested. But the Red Guard spirit of the left launched the Occupy Wall Street bowel Movement, launched the bitter, seething Black Lives Matter bowel movement, and from their launched dozens of violent FASCIST attacks on Trump supporters merely for believing that in a democracy they had the freedom to support their party’s candidate for president.

And guess what? This particular vicious fascist has the name of Kino Jimenez. Democrats have been importing his ilk by the millions.

Just like the Red Guard, these vicious, fascist young people believe they not only have the right, but in fact the duty, to do these hateful things. And they have been set upon decent people by the Mao-tse-tungs of liberalism, the Democratic Party and their propaganda machine, the mainstream media, telling -frankly screaming – at us on such a regular basis that Trump is so evil that we need to have our own Cultural Revolution to restore what Trump destroyed in America.

You’re going to see below that I’m now out to lay blame on the people who are trying to get into this country. I’m very much out to point out that we have a treasonous, profoundly anti-American group of people who are doing everything possible to bring immigrants in by whatever means they can, legal or otherwise, to load the dice for the cynical, frankly wicked game they want to play with the American people powerless to stop them from playing it as they rig the system using Saul Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals from within of every branch of government and every bureaucracy of our government. Just think of the liberal “judges” who think that the manufactured “right” of abortion based on invented “penumbras” and “emanations” is somehow “settled law” when the same wicked judges who clearly don’t give a damn about our Constitution believe the clear text of the 2nd Amendment can be overturned. Over and over again, these fascist leftist judges have issued psychotic rulings that are as partisan as hell is hot. Or try this one: Think of the top brass Obama installed in the FBI who texted each other with fascist treason such as this exchange between high-level FBI officials deeply involved with both the Hillary Clinton whitewash and the Donald Trump witch hunt:

This is what we’re up against. And when I say “we” I mean the American people.

A liberal author named David Faris wrote a Book titled, “It’s Time to Fight Dirty.” Not that the Democrats have ever fought any other way, as it were. But here’s what he said:

Republicans have always feared that immigration would change the character of American society. Democrats should reward them with their very worst nightmare.

Tucker Carlson on his program pointed out, “Remember that paragraph. It is the blueprint for what we are about to see.” And in fact what we have already BEEN seeing. Carlson went on to say, “They’re going to tell you it’s about civil rights, or about some other principle that they pretend to care about, but they are lying. It’s about seizing power and holding it. That’s their only aim.”

Let’s get one thing straight: a supposedly “American” political party that is intentionally loading up our nation with foreigners who have nothing to do with American values certainly and clearly don’t give one flying damn about “American society.” They want to replace “American society.” And they have lost the American people and so they have to import voters who AREN’T American in order to do it. They’re actually even starting to admit that fact.

Please remember a key fact about Democrats and the Democratic Party: they are nakedly evil. That might sound extreme, but the Democratic Party has ALWAYS been at the forefront of wickedness and racism in America. Always. It is an easily documented fact of history. And the fact of the matter is that they still are today. An interesting article I came across bears the title, “23 maps that explain how Democrats went from the party of racism to the party of Obama.” What is the Democratic Party? It is the party of Andrew Jackson. It was the party of Indian removal. The Democratic Party was THE party of “Manifest Destiny.” The Democratic Party was the party of slavery and literally treasonously seceded from the United States when ant-slavery candidate and Republican Abraham Lincoln was elected (yes, history repeats itself in the current climate of rabid hate toward a Republican president). The Democratic Party was purely and simply the party that waged the vicious Civil War against the United States of America. Rabid Democratic Party ideologues assassinated Abraham Lincoln. The Democratic Party was the incredibly racist political organization that dominated the racist South during the era of so-called “Reconstruction.” Which was in reality Democrats “reconstruction” of the very same racist hate and racist policies that they had held before Republicans defeated them in the Civil War that Democrats started and were able to put in place once they had murdered a powerful, victorious president. The Democratic Party was the party of the Ku Klux Klan, which is rightly defined as the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party and was organized to terrorize blacks and white Republicans. We can go on and on. The Democratic Party was the party of President Woodrow Wilson who literally fired all the blacks in the federal government and RE-segregated the military that Republicans had DE-segregated as Democrats were still very much the hard-core party of hard-core racism into the 20th century. Woodrow Wilson, the godfather of the progressive movement, was a hard core racist and even the very leftist Atlantic acknowledges that fact of history. The Democratic Party was the Party of “Klanbake,” the 1924 Democratic National Convention that was utterly dominated by the Ku Klux Klan a full 60 years after their defeat in the Civil War for the same racist hate. The Democratic Party was the party of the racist FDR who cynically exploited the racist labor unions who excluded racial minorities with a vengeance (and the left acknowledges that unions are STILL “f-ing rabidly racist”, btw); the party that put Japanese-Americans into camps; the party that started the godawful Tuskegee experiment in which black men were intentionally and deceitfully left untreated with syphilis so the government could track the progression of the horrible disease. As this nation continued into the 1950s, it was still the Democratic Party that was largely THE party of racist discrimination. And as we enter the 1960s, the Democrats were still primarily racist and ONLY passed the most significant Civil Rights laws with the overwhelming supporting votes of Republicans (who somehow have been dishonestly denied credit for that fact ever since).

The bait-and-switch of a party that never changed its spots from its former days of evil to its modern days of evil can be summed up in a statement of President Lyndon Baines Johnson before two governors in 1963:

“These Negroes, they’re getting pretty uppity these days and that’s a problem for us since they’ve got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we’ve got to do something about this, we’ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference… I’ll have them niggers voting Democratic for the next two hundred years”.

But this was the period, matching the period of the time when the Democratic Party truly turned evil and violent as shown in its utter disgrace of a 1968 Democratic National Convention. Democrats were losing a majority of whites because most whites weren’t and AREN’T racist, and this party with its utterly wicked history needed a new voter block to remain in power. And they needed to create a plantation of socialist “entitlement” spending to build that plantation so the slaves would willingly come and happily remain. The REAL Klan, the Klan that always has been and always will be a Democratic Party monster, had a new plantation for blacks and welcomed them onto that plantation just like Mr. Roarke at the beginning of a Fantasy Island episode. It sounded so good, but there was something so damn sinister behind literally making naked pandering (“vote for us and we’ll give you other people’s money and food that other people paid for and places to live that other people are forced to pay for”) the very heart of their wicked political philosophy. But what has that done for black people? They get some money and food and a place to live, which creates an innate existential crisis as it saps their will to work and produce anything for themselves. Other people have to work hard for their money and their food and a place to live, and that work-ethic ennobles them and allows them to build something better. Add to that disincentive to work, understand that the Democrats have also propagandized and demagogued blacks into believing that whitey has rigged the system against them so there is no point in trying. But here’s our plantation you can live on forever. And so blacks vote and keep voting for the very people who are actually most keeping them down. And the ruin of American blacks is complete as they succumb to drugs, to abortion to the tune of murdering 60% of their own babies, to fatherlessness, to gangs, to prison, at rates shockingly higher than any other group of Americans. The cynical wickedness of the Democratic Party and the ramifications that wickedness has had on the very constituencies Democrats most claim to care about is beyond tragic.

Black unemployment has plunged to the lowest level in HISTORY under Donald Trump. But there is literally not one single Democrat – and most especially not one rabid, toxic, race-hating, demagogue on the Congressional Black Caucus – who cares about black Americans. Blacks are nothing but votes and a political platform to step on for these bugs who murder millions of babies. If they start working for themselves, start earning their OWN money, they will get “uppity” and believe that they should be able to keep more of what they earn rather than have the all-knowing and all-good government decide they can spend it more wisely and forcibly confiscate it. And maybe they’ll even realize as they create homes for themselves and families for themselves that their children ARE NOT bugs that can be murdered in a holocaust wherein 60% of black babies are butchered in the Democratic Party abortion mills. And they will start voting the way their ancestors who were freed by Republicans FROM Democrats used to vote.

Let me give you one lower-than-roach example: Rep. Maxine Waters. She’s calling for a massive campaign of intolerance and hate for all Trump supporters. She demands that Trump supporters be shamed into using the back entrances of restaurants. Maybe she wants separate drinking fountains and separate bathrooms for Trump supporters. I guarantee she wants to force Trump supporters to sit in the back of the bus and give up their seat if a leftist wants it. Blacks of ALL people should be aware of what a low, dark, dangerous platform this vicious demagogue hater is spewing. Because if it’s right to do that to us, it was right to do it to you and damn you it will be right to do it to you AGAIN. The Black Caucus that supports this riot-spewing-hater needs to be banned and abolished. Or at least stop being racist hypocrites and demand the creation of a Congressional White Caucus that will openly preach the same race hate that Maxine Waters is allowed to preach in the halls of Congress from the white side. That ought to give any decent person pause. But there aren’t any decent people on the left.

One example of the fact that Democrats literally and simply do not care about the American people is in the economic numbers. For instance, the manufacturing index hit a high that Obama never saw once in his entire miserable fool presidency. As Trump cuts taxes, guts regulations, prevents the EPA from declaring economic warfare on job creators, guess what? Factories are opening and jobs are being offered. But Democrats don’t want you to work; they need you to be dependent on them. They don’t want you to have a job and don’t want you to think that anyone will even offer you a damn job. Stay dependent on us; remain wards of the state forever. Keep voting for us. Believe our damn lies. And so hey, everybody, let’s look over here at the bright shiny thing we’re constantly screaming about. Don’t look over there at how well your country is actually finally working under the man we despise.

Please don’t get fooled for one second: the Democratic Party was still very much a party of racism and the very same damn cockroach Democrats who are at the very forefront of screaming about Republican “hate” today were doing the exact same thing not too terribly long ago. Let’s take a trip down memory lane and look at socialist California and its socialist governor, Jerry Brown, just for one example.

Despite today’s outrage over President Donald Trump’s refugee executive order, many liberals in 1975 were part of a chorus of big name Democrats who refused to accept any Vietnamese refugees when millions were trying to escape South Vietnam as it fell to the communists.

They even opposed orphans.

The group, led by California’s Gov. Jerry Brown, included such liberal luminaries as Delaware’s Democratic Sen. Joe Biden, former presidential “peace candidate” George McGovern, and New York Congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzman.

The Los Angeles Times reported Brown even attempted to prevent planes carrying Vietnamese refugees from landing at Travis Air Force Base outside San Francisco. About 500 people were arriving each day and eventually 131,000 These people arrived despite protests from liberal Democrats. In 2015, the Los Angeles Times recounted Brown’s ugly attitude, reporting, “Brown has his own checkered history of demagoguery about refugees.”

Back in 1975, millions of South Vietnamese who worked for or supported the U.S. found themselves trapped behind the lines when the communists took over the country. Vietnamese emigre Tung Vu, writing in Northwest Asian Weekly, recalled the hardships the Vietnamese faced in 1975 as they tried to escape the communists.

“After the fall of Saigon, many Vietnamese chose to leave by any means possible, often in small boats. Those who managed to escape pirates, typhoons, and starvation sought safety and a new life in refugee camps,” Tung wrote.

Ironically, Republicans led by former President Gerald Ford were the political figures who fought for the refugees to enter the United States.arrived in the United States between 1975 and 1977.

Julia Taft, who in 1975 headed up Ford’s Inter-agency Task Force on Indochinese refugee resettlement, told author Larry Engelmann in his book, “Tears Before the Rain: An Oral History of the Fall of South Vietnam,” “The new governor of California, Jerry Brown, was very concerned about refugees settling in his state.”

National Public Radio host Debbie Elliott retraced Brown’s refusal to accept any refugees in a January 2007 interview with Taft. According to a transcript, which was aired on its flagship program, “All Things Considered,” Taft said, “our biggest problem came from California due to Brown.” She called his rejection of Vietnamese refugees “a moral blow.”

“I remember at the time we had thousands and thousands of requests from military families in San Diego, for instance, who had worked in Vietnam, who knew some of these people,” she told NPR.

Taft recalled another dark reason the liberals opposed the refugees: “They said they had too many Hispanics, too many people on welfare, they didn’t want these people.”

Did you notice that part about Republicans and military veterans in the spirit of the party of Lincoln who were the heroes of this terrible period of rabid, toxic, psychotic, evil Democrat Party and the People’s Republic of Californiastan and Jerry Brown hate???

So it turns out that the same hypocrite California and the same Cockroach King governor Jerry Brown were at the forefront of what they now claim was the very worst, very ugliest kind of hatred and racism and bigotry. Not that there is one honest, virtuous, decent Democrat in California or in America, for that matter: they reelected Jerry Brown and gleefully allowed that self-proven demagogue to demagogue once again.

Let me simply report a naked FACT: if Hispanics voted Republican, the Democrats would literally be screaming in the streets and rioting chanting for their violent deaths. Because to be a Democrat is to be a cockroach. These people aren’t capable of any genuine empathy any more than they are capable of any genuine morality: they murder their own babies. Bugs do that. These Democrats who drove God out of our nation and literally put Jesus Christ in a jar of urine and shamefully displayed Him in the guise of government-funded “art” long-ago betrayed any vestige of the image of God. They chose to claim they had instead evolved from bugs. The only problem is that they DEvolved from that point, rather than Evolved. They’re not capable of human nobility and the only human emotions they have are also shared in common with the bug.

Democrats don’t give any more of a flying damn for illegal immigrants than they do for the 60 million innocent babies they viciously murdered in the womb. One day, I tell you, the Nazis will stand in judgment against every single Democrat. pointing out the fact that they only denied the humanity of 6 million Jews and murdered them whereas Democrats are 10 times more evil.

On Sunday, photos of children laying inside a chain-link fence cage starting flying around the internet. New York Times Magazine editor-in-chief Jake Silverstein forwarded it to his followers, saying that “all of these photos are disturbing, but the first two are especially awful.”

CNN’s Hadas Gold described the pictures as “First Photos of separated migrant children at holding facility.”
Outrage quickly followed.

“This is happening right now,” said former Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau. “Speechless. This is not who we are as a nation,” said Antonio Villaraigosa, who is running for California governor. Actress Rosanna Arquette called it a “sick crime against Humanity”

Turns out the photos were taken in 2014 — when, ahem, President Obama was in the White House, a fact that nobody bothered to check before blowing a gasket. Once word of that fact got out, many of these same people deleted their tweets, rather than admit that the “sick crime” happened under their beloved Obama.

Next, there was a picture showing a bus outfitted with child safety seats being used at an ICE family detention center in Karnes County, Texas. ABC Houston reporter Antonio Arellano tweeted the picture on Sunday, describing it as “a prison bus just for babies.”

Again, outrage ensued.

“Unconscionable and inhumane, “said Texas Sen. Sylvia Garcia. “This is what we’ve come to under Donald Trump,” said Stephen King. Others tweeted: “your new gestapo at work,” “this is what fascism looks like,” “we live in a dark period of American history,” “moral abomination.” Etc., etc.

Oops. Turns out this picture, too, was taken when Obama was president. And, the bus was actually used to take the children on field trips to places like the San Antonio Zoo, a nearby park, the movies, as well as for medical treatment and court appointments.

So much for the Trump-era inhumane prison bus for babies.

There was not a single prominent Democrat who publicly attacked Barack Hussein Obama for his horrifying racist hatred toward poor Hispanic children. And it is a telling and appalling fact that they had to go back to the now acknowledged vileness of their own Obama to fake-news slime the man they rabidly hated.

Again, the entire border crisis that Democrats have had a hysterical Nazi meltdown over was THEIR crisis just a couple of years ago and they did NOTHING to try to resolve it when they had not only the damn White House, but the House of Representatives AND a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. These demagogic purveyors of hate did NOTHING when they could have changed the entire immigration system if they had cared enough about Hispanics or about illegal immigrants to lift so much as a damn pinky finger. And anyone with a scintilla of historical awareness knows that these very same Democratic cockroach hypocrites did the very same thing that they are claiming is tantamount to Nazism to the Vietnamese who had fought to help us fight communism and who were physically suffering FAR more than any immigrant crossing into the United States from Mexico is today. Which is to say that these bugs are demon-possessed cockroach evil not by my standards, but now by their OWN standards.

The blockquoted article above continues to expose patently demagogic lies that come from the colluding conspiracy between the Democratic Party and the mainstream media who have brought back the very worst days of William Randolph Hearst’s “yellow journalism.” You know, where the powers-that-be gin up fake outrage and literally start wars with blatant propaganda.

Our modern immigration framework has its roots in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, which was signed into law by Clinton. It instituted many of the hallmarks of the criminalization regime, upping the number of people eligible for deportation while shrinking the opportunities to gain legal status. The law hasn’t aged well in progressive circles: During the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton had to denounce her own husband’s policies.

I personally call this an act of treason against the United States of America, the citizens of this nation, and the Constitution.

Today’s Democrats are both open borders AND socialist. Does anyone with half a functioning brain comprehend what that means, as we allow MILLIONS, TENS OF MILLIONS, HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS – because I DEFY any liberal to tell me a NUMBER of exactly how many illegal immigrants is ENOUGH so that we start cracking down and kicking them the hell out of our country – to enter our nation and then receive a host of benefits that hard-working Americans will be forced to pay for. It is by any sane definition unsustainable: to be a Democrat is to demand the implosion of America as a nation. Again, this is the kind of thing BUGS do. These aren’t people who are capable of loving their children and caring about their futures: they MURDER their children. That is who they are by definition of what they most rabidly stand for (abortion on demand). If you are a Democrat, you necessarily think of your child as a bug you could have killed and remained a “good” person because you were merely following a cherished doctrine of your bug religion.

Stop and consider the ugliness of the future Democrats have for this nation: BILLIONS of people living here, having long-since destroyed our way of life, our culture, our democracy, and consumed our wealth like a vast locust horde invading a field once green with crops but now stripped barren. And again, liberal, if you want to argue with me about this, please document for me the prominent members of your wicked political party who have stated the number of immigrants who would be too many and what we would do to stop this invasion.

I wrote this piece a while back detailing how liberals are intentionally trying to crowd millions of people into densely-rat-packed cities and keep them helpless and dependent on government because that’s the only way their hateful, horrible policies can prevail. The 1984-Orwellian character of what the Democratic Party has planned for this nation is truly stunning and terrifying. It is an easy-to-prove FACT that liberals only win when they can jam people into packed cities and kill the American way of life.

And no, this is NOT a theoretical issue: this has already happened in Europe and in the United Kingdom as millions of Muslims have poured into these countries and changed the very culture and way of life of its citizens who are now afraid to walk the streets of their own cities. Europeans are increasingly realizing that their “tolerant” immigration policies are completely unsustainable. The problem is that this realization has probably come too late: these countries will never be the same and things are going to get far uglier and far nastier as a result as a rising percentage of unassimilated people already prone to bitterness and violence become increasingly unemployed and increasingly resentful and increasingly willing to pursue violent jihad as a result.

I’ve heard this number of 11 million illegal immigrants as the “official estimate” reported seemingly forever, at least since the 1980s. We’re supposed to believe that just as many voluntarily go home every year as come here??? And where do these numbers come from that make them reliable? The government? Seriously? I think of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the incredibly erroneous estimates they provided just with ObamaCare and basically every budget they’ve ever “scored.” These people are fools and clowns and yes, ideologues. The number of illegal immigrants hasn’t risen whatsoever in forty years, but in my decades of life in the state of California, somehow I am now surrounded by people who speak only Spanish when that was simply not true when I was a child. But government-worshiping Democrats reassure me, “Don’t believe what your racist eyes and ears tell you.”

Only I believe I’ve already proven that it’s THESE bugs who are the actual RACISTS and all they’ve done is “fundamentally transformed” the targets of their racist hate. The new target of Democratic Party racism shifted from the black man to the white male; the new target of hate has shifted from the Jew to the Evangelical Christian. Just compare the number of Christians and even just plain religious people or people who believe in an objective source for morality between liberal godlessness and conservative belief in God and morality. 78% of conservatives believe in God with absolute certainty and another 14% believe with fair certainty. 83% of conservatives believe in heaven and 72% believe in hell. And 48% of conservatives believe there are clear objective standards for what is right and what is wrong. That is shockingly low, until you compare it with liberals. Only 45% of liberals believe in God with “certainty” and only 24% believe with “fair certainty.” Only 18% of liberals rely on religion for guidance on right versus wrong and only 19% of liberals believe that there is any clear, objective right or wrong with 79% of liberals believing that morality depends on a relative situation and whatever the hell they want right or wrong to mean. And significantly more liberals don’t believe in hell than believe in it. Which explains why they can be as evil as they are and not believe there will ever be any consequences for it.

The problem with secular humanist liberalism is that there is no moral “oughtness” to it. There is no ultimate, transcendent, objective moral source of authority that tells me that I ought to do one thing and that I ought not do another thing. They do what they want and they do whatever they want. Which is why communism, which is simply the more common name for “official state atheism” that communism is, has as its central dictate in every single form it metastasizes in (Soviet communism versus Maoism, etc.) is that “the ends justifies the means.” There simply are no moral compunctions for a liberal. They can even murder 60 million of their own babies and feel as serene in their act of genocide as the baby they arbitrarily allow to survive feels sleeping in a crib. But let us never forget that baby sleeping peacefully in a crib is merely a thing that could have been brutally and callously killed and that no human being has a transcendent right even to live, let alone to anything else. In the same way, abortion demands that there is no such thing as a “father,” because if there was that father would certainly have the basic right to not have his child murdered against his will while the state forced him into a state of moral helplessness. And so we understand that just as Democrats murdered 60 million of the very most innocent human beings, they also murdered fatherhood. And millions of fathers walk away from their children because Democrats indoctrinated them to walk away and provided them with no right to do anything else.

These Democrats are simply appalling. They have created the very worst and the very ugliest of the immigration debacle in this country with their stupid laws and their wicked judicial rulings. They have created an arbitrary Catch-22 in which Donald Trump can either allow millions of immigrants to enter the country and simply fail to ever show up for their deportation hearings or hold them indefinitely while they wait for court hearings the left has decided everyone who comes to the border has the right to have. And if you criminally charge the parent such that they can be subsequently deservedly can be charged with a felony for trying to illegally enter the United States twice, you have to separate the child from the parent in the same way that any American put in jail must be separated from his or her children. This is simply true. But the Democrats and their mainstream media propagandist fake news allies intentionally and deliberately distort and outright lie as they create a fake news picture with the hopes of dishonestly and cynically benefitting from a disastrous mess that they themselves created and will do nothing to help fix and change.

Democrats falsely claim to represent those who are helpless and cannot speak for themselves? Tell that to the 60 million innocent helpless babies who couldn’t speak for themselves that these butchers callously murdered and literally murdered with PRIDE. You ONLY matter to these bugs if there’s a naked political interest for you to matter to them. Otherwise they couldn’t care less. Like when they had total control of the White House, a filibuster-proof domination of the Senate and the House and illegal immigrants and their poor children didn’t matter one bit.

Think of it this way: whose constituents do Democrats claim Hispanics are part of, Republicans or theirs? Theirs, obviously. And so given that Hispanics and all of these illegal immigrants are THEIR constituency, THEIR group, shouldn’t they be willing to do something to help these people they claim to represent? Shouldn’t they be willing to negotiate and compromise with Republicans to secure certain rights and privileges for the group they claim to represent? But they DON’T. They do NOTHING but demonize and demagogue and slander and lie. They don’t give one flying damn about these people at ALL; they just cynically exploit them in the most grievous way, literally intentionally creating a situation in which they will suffer in order to point a finger at Republicans and blame them for the suffering that they actually have significantly themselves created. Because the ends justify the means and the means are surely justified by the end to these godless immoral vermin.

And the most typical victims of these bug-monsters are Hispanics, and most typically illegal immigrant Hispanics. Which amounts to yet another of so many proofs that Democrats don’t give one flying damn about the people they fake-news claim to care about.

We truly need a border wall and we truly need enforcement of our laws and a resistance against the lawlessness of Democrats who believe in their “ends justify the means” Stalinist mindset that they are entitled to only follow the rule of law if they feel like it but they are free to ignore any laws they don’t like even as they resist assisting Republicans in simply trying to govern and create a better system from the cynical, rigged, chaotic mess they have made it.

This nation and its citizens need to fight for their right to survive. And July 5th is a great day to start fighting back.

I’ll make my point right here, if it wasn’t already crystal-clear enough in my title: if Roseanne Barr’s tweet about Valerie Jarrett being the baby resulting from the Muslim Brotherhood and Planet of the Apes was “racist” and an attack against all people of color, then Samantha Bee’s CBS network-aired spewage about the President of the United States’ daughter being a “feckless cunt” is misogynistic and an attack against all women, And CBS is misogynistic and hateful to women for not having already fired her. It is as simple as that.

So Roseanne Barr makes a stupid, and yeah, frankly racist comment about former top Obama advisor Valerie Jarrett. Among the many reasons it was just beyond stupid is that Roseanne Barr frankly shouldn’t be throwing stones in glass houses when it comes to how other women look. I also must personally confess that I remember finding “Dr. Zira” strangely attractive when I first saw her in the original movie. But that’s another story.

And then, immediately after ABC proved it has a zero-tolerance attitude for anyone who could be perceived as a Republican saying anything nasty, Samantha Bee had this to say in viciously attacking President Trump’s daughter:

CBS rightly took some responsibility for the comment, because the word appeared on their network show which is NOT broadcast live. Which means the entire network actively participated in Samantha Bee’s vile comment. Whereas while the left and their many allies masquerading as “journalists” tried to make it appear – fake-news-style- that Donald Trump was to blame. When in actuality it was only Roseanne and her Ambien, or whatever she was on.

It doesn’t bother me that Roseanne was fired. Yeah, what she said was beneath contempt.

What bothers me is to be a liberal is to be a pathological hypocrite. And progressive liberals are now every bit as much the combination of self-righteousness and hypocrisy as the Pharisees and Sadducees of Jesus’ day ever were.

In addition to Samantha Bee, who said something on a network and directly involved her network when Roseanne Barr did no such thing, we also have a Democrat named Dan Helmer who is running an ad on these same self-righteous television networks that directly compares the President of the United States to Osama bin Laden. Now, what makes that funny in a pathologically self-righteous hypocrite sort of way, is that Roseanne Barr’s exact tweet was, “muslim brotherhood & planet of the apes had a baby=vj.” And so we literally just had a trifecta of hypocrisy: Bee’s “cunt” remark is FAR more hateful than Barr’s “planet” remark; Dan Helmer’s “Osama bin Laden” ad was far more beyond the pale than Barr’s “Muslim Brotherhood” was; and Valerie Jarrett actually went to CBS which hosts Bee and participated in “cunts” to pontificate about Roseanne Barr’s unacceptable words.

We’ve got Kathy Griffen rescinding her non-apology after doing a photo of herself holding an incredibly lifelike severed head of the President of the United States. And amazingly in terms of self-righteous hypocrisy, she rescinded her so-called apology on an ABC program. Somehow, I don’t think that taking back of an apology that was never sincere to begin with would have been quite so-okay had Roseanne Barr did the same ugly thing a few years ago with Barack Obama’s gory, severed head. Any more than it would have been okay for Barr to hatefully attack – and even using the word “cunt” – against Obama’s daughter.

President Trump on Tuesday slammed Democrats who shared pictures of child migrants sleeping in cages to knock his immigration policies, only to backtrack after realizing the photos were taken during the Obama administration.
“Democrats mistakenly tweet 2014 pictures from Obama’s term showing children from the Border in steel cages,” Trump tweeted. “They thought it was recent pictures in order to make us look bad, but backfires.”

One photo of children in a cell was shared numerous times over the weekend amid outrage over Trump administration policies of separating illegal immigrant parents from their children at the southern border.

Trump opponents who shared the photo included activists, journalists and former Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau, who said: “This is happening right now, and the only debate that matters is how we force our government to get these kids back to their families as fast as humanly possible.”

Tucker Carlson ran a beautiful segment about how the progressive left incredibly hypocritically kowtows to human-rights abusing China. When it comes to human rights, human freedom and human dignity, China is the greatest monster in the history of the world, but ALL the liberal progressive communications entities literally aid and abet China in its destruction of the human soul as a matter of routine. And it’s easy to document:

The left doesn’t care about humanity or human decency. These people stand for nothing. They don’t care about black people. They don’t care about women. They don’t care about illegal immigrants. They don’t care about anyone but themselves. They never have stood for anything but themselves. And everything has always been nothing more than an ends-justifies-the-means means to and end to these people whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron.

It’s hard for me to get too angry or upset about Roseanne’s racism when it’s so easy to demonstrate that the people who are the most “outraged” by it are themselves incapable of decency, or integrity, or honesty, or virtue of any kind. It’s nothing but a game. And in this game the progressive left constantly moves the goal posts and controls all the referees. And when I condemn a Roseanne Barr, I am merely playing the game on their terms, because they will never condemn in the same manner their Samantha Bees, their Keith Olbermann’s, their Kathy Griffens, their Michelle Wolfs. I merely participate with them in destroying my players, but they will never participate in any way, shape or form in destroying their players.

We stand for what’s right. But the left will NEVER stand for what is right.

The Word of God prophetically described these people and this end-times generation that would be both hateful and lawless just before the coming of the beast whom they will worship because they are evil. And here we are.

“I am shocked because I know you are a socially liberal person in general,” Kimmel said.

“I’m still the same! You all moved,” she said.

“We did?” Kimmel asked.

“You all went so fucking far out you lost everybody,” Barr said.

“You’re probably right, by the way,” Kimmel reacted.

“Seriously, a lot of your audience, and including me — I just want to say this, a lot of this, no matter who we voted for we don’t want to see our president fail, you know?” she said to tepid applause.

“You want Pence for the freakin’ president?” she asked Kimmel

“No,” he said.

“Well then zip that fucking lip,” she told him.

That is exactly right, and it is what is most disastrously and dangerously wrong with liberalism and with the Democratic Party that is now owned lock, stock and barrel by the most radical ideologues. Stop and think about Roseanne Barr’s last obviously true point: if you get rid of Trump, do you know who you’ll be calling “Mister President”???? The arch-conservative Mike Pence, that’s who. But the left is so animalistic, if not bug-like, in it’s roach-hate that it is incapable of any manner of introspection whatsoever, and so, in wild, rabid contradiction to their own interests, they are trying to do everything imaginable to impeach and boot the non-ideological Donald Trump as president and thereby install Mike Pence who would not only be able to carry Trump voters, but get the mainstream conservatives behind him as well and guarantee a Republican victory in 2020. Or, in other words, no thinking liberal would want Mike Pence as president; but the only problem is that there is no such THING as a “thinking liberal.” Such creatures went extinct quite a while ago, as I can continue to prove and document.

MAGA may actually mean Making America Gun-Free Again.
Remington was once among the nation’s largest gun and ammunition makers – it was founded in 1816, when there were only 19 U.S. states. But due to sliding sales and mounting debt, the company announced over the weekend that it was filing for bankruptcy. […]

One of the main reasons for the sales downturn was ironically the election of President Donald Trump. During his campaign, Trump claimed that “Hillary Clinton wants to take your guns away and she wants to abolish the Second Amendment.”

As such, gun enthusiasts began stockpiling rifles in fear of a Clinton victory. But after Trump won, sales cooled—consumers likely thought a president who was endorsed by the National Rifle Association wouldn’t infringe on their rights.

So Remington, expecting a Hillary win because that’s what everybody from the damn fake news mainstream media assured us was going to happen, gambled huge on a Clinton gun-grabber win and massively ramped up production so panicked citizens could buy guns while America was still America and we still had a viable Constitution and people still had rights in this country. But instead Donald Trump – contrary to all the egghead liberals who were wrong and have been wrong every damn since – won. And comforted people relaxed and didn’t buy all the guns Remington expected them to buy. And now they had all this inventory on hand that they suddenly couldn’t sell. Because it turns out that most Americans don’t necessarily want to have a gun; they just want to be able to buy one if they believe they need it. And that the last thing they want is a fascist gun-grabber who does what ALL fascist totalitarians have done throughout history and strips the people of their right to defend themselves from tyranny so of course tyranny can reign supreme.

It is simply a fact that no rational intellect can dispute: Barack Hussein Obama did more for gun sales than any American president in the entire history of the republic.

President Barack Obama has glibly been awarded the title of the World’s Greatest Guns Salesman during his seven years in office, and it appears that his eighth and final year will be his most successful ever.

According to the FBI, the NICS background check system, which serves as a proxy for gun sales, reported 1,870,000 background checks in the month of May, the highest in recorded history and enough to re-equip the entire United States military. That is 290,000 more background checks than last May, 440,000 more than May of 2014, and 850,000 less than Obama’s first May in office in 2009.

Again, the problem is that there is no such thing as a liberal or Democrat who is not pathologically insane. They all went extinct, killed off by their own rabid, hysterical batpoop craziness.

Liberals went too far. WAY too far. And because they rabidly abandoned the Imago Dei, the image of God, they became mindless roaches and mindlessly created the exact opposite state of affairs that they would have wanted if they just had functioning humanity within them.

Which is to say that there is going to be a very special place at the very bottom of hell for Barack Obama. This piece of filth was truly a monster – especially by the left’s own rhetoric.

And the left would truly despise this hypocrite fascist: IF there existed such a thing as a liberal capable of moral consistency, that is. But the last liberal capable of moral consistency faded away into extinction long ago and it is highly unlikely that the magic force of unicorn fairy-dust evolution will be able to produce another such creature ever again.

Liberal, Democrat-appointed Supreme Court Justice (retired) John Paul Stevens just publicly came out demanding a repeal of the 2nd Amendment and I demand a litmus test for any candidate for president swear that they will never appoint such a Justice. But as I’m going to show you below, to be a Democrat is to be a lying swindling hypocrite who plays word-games with reality and with the truth and who cannot be trusted in anything whatsoever. So these lying weasels will smugly declared, “Oh, I’m not in favor of doing the thing that I actually am totally in favor of doing.” They’ll play the imbecilic game that the 2nd Amendment was written at a time when all we had were muskets, and so all we’re allowed is muskets. Okay, fine, you hypocrite Luddite frauds, we’re also not allowed telephones or televisions or automobiles or computers or phones or damn near anything else we didn’t have back in 1787. And to make it even crazier, the Constitution doesn’t guarantee the right to ANY of the things but it DOES guarantee “the right of the people to keep and bear arms.”

And way, way back in May of 2012 I predicted that there would be a giant backlash due to Barack Obama’s rabidly fascist policies that no liberal saw as anything other than mainstream and wonderful because they are such deluded, pathologically fascist narcissists:

Obama’s strategy is to set aside and flatly ignore the law for his own political benefit. Every American who is not deeply troubled by that – troubled enough to not vote for this fascist – is UN-American.

What Obama has done is provide an example of out-and-out lawlessness on the part of the president of the United States. And when we get a hard-core right wing president the way Obama has been a hard-core left wing president, Obama and the Democrat Party and all of those who voted for Obama and the Democrat Party will be entirely to blame for that president and his extremist actions. You mark my words. Because what goes around comes around, and if a Democrat can set aside the law the way Obama has now repeatedly done, well, guess who’s going to be stomping on your necks under your own president’s prior justification??? Conservatives are rising up in a spirit of righteous outrage. You have repeatedly slapped us in the face through your messiah Obama, and the time is coming when we’re going to punch you hard in the nose and then keep on punching. And when that day comes, liberals, look to yourselves for blame. — My words on June 18, 2012

Obama gave us Trump. Now the left wants to take Trump back and give us Pence instead. So they can go even more rabid with frothing hate while demonically and hypocritically calling themselves the party of “tolerance.” What the hell kind of “tolerance” do these whackjob hypocrites have???? We can literally win a national election and STILL be dismissed in terms of the most stupid, most deluded, most absurd strawman in the leftist arsenal. If my point of view isn’t valid after a national election victory, then please explain to me why I ought to even remotely consider ANY point of view that you clowns offer.

I suppose I simply could have said what Roseanne Barr said to Jimmy Kimmel: the left went too damn far. So damn far it was beyond UNREAL.

It is an amazing thing to view the sheer number of policies that the left now screams are the most evil things in existence that they themselves were declaring just a few years ago: whether it was on abortion, or on illegal immigration, or on homosexuality and marriage.

SEN. OBAMA: I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman. (Applause.) Now, for me as a Christian, it’s also a sacred union. You know, God’s in the mix. (Applause.)

But one political party was pathologically dishonest and lied and reneged on what it claimed so it could “fundamentally transform” what it had previously claim was the truth.

Barack Obama claimed that marriage was between one man and one woman and that he wasn’t for gay marriage “as a Christian.” As a Christian, the Democratic Party will burn in hell forever and ever and ever according to these words that they falsely claimed they believed. Because to be a Democrat is to be a demon-possessed lying hypocrite pathologically incapable of honesty or integrity or decency or virtue or any other good thing.

PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON: “All Americans, not only in the States most heavily affected but in every place in this country, are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country.

The jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants. The public service they use impose burdens on our taxpayers.

That’s why our administration has moved aggressively to secure our borders more by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, by cracking down on illegal hiring, by barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens.

In the budget I will present to you, we will try to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes, to better identify illegal aliens in the workplace…

We are a nation of immigrants. But we are also a nation of laws. It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years, and we must do more to stop it.” (Bill Clinton, Remarks At State Of The Union, Washington, D.C., 1/24/95)

There is simply no question whatsoever that the Democratic Party of today stands condemned as the most vile kind of traitorous vermin as rightly judged by the Democratic Party of 1995. Working class Americans realized Obama and the Democrats were literally at WAR with them, literally intentionally giving illegal immigrants their jobs and devaluing their work if they did have jobs because of the millions of people Democrats had artificially added to the labor force competition through illegal immigration. But Democrats don’t give a flying damn about working class Americans; they need voters. And they’re fine illegally importing foreigners to cynically get what they cynically want.

I could go on and on about all the stuff that Democrats used to acknowledge as simply true facts but now rabidly despises as worse than the Nazis. It’s remarkable how these fools’ heads don’t explode from trying to contain all the contradictions. I mean, we have the new “Me Too” movement and oh, are they ever trying to give Trump hell about alleged affairs that the so-called “victims” themselves claim were entirely consensual. Let’s forget about the legitimate allegations of rape, of overt sexual harassment, that Bill Clinton was guilty of.

George Stephanopoulos is the honored, esteemed anchor of ABC News. Let’s go back down memory lane of George overtly threatening a journalist – oh, and a female journalist at that – who had uncovered numerous women who were claiming that not only had they had sex with Bill Clinton, but in some cases he’d even fathered their babies. Let’s watch this living emobiement of the fact that to be a liberal is to be a pathological hypocrite in every imaginable way possible:

Why are you hypocrite fools so self-righteously coming out against Donald Trump’s lawyer for doing anything to contain any allegations of ANYTHING or allegedly making any kind of a threat to anyone to stop reporting anything? When there’s this giant log named George Stephanopoulos and basically the entire Democratic Party of just a few years ago blocking your damn view of the speck in Donald Trump’s eye???

Keep in mind, this election was a bipolar choice between Hillary or Donald Trump. People chose. And married women, and in particular white married women, chose for Donald Trump over Hillary. Why did they do that???

“[Democrats] do not do well with white men and we don’t do well with married, white women,” Clinton explained. “And part of that is an identification with the Republican Party, and a sort of ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son, whoever, believes you should.”

Which is to say that women are strong, tough and decisive. But of course, simultaneously, they are weak, pathetic and think whatever thought they are allowed to think if and only if their husbands give them permission. Now, proceeding from Hillary’s rationale (as a white woman), she would had she been elected president only done what her husband told her to do. But her husband is a rapist and serial sexual predator.

I hope you see the sheer ridiculousness of this idiocy. But Hillary Clinton in mutual contradiction ran her campaign carpetbagging simultaneously on her husband’s coattails and on the mantras of feminism both at the same time. And also in mutual contradiction, she was this strong, tough, decisive woman whenever it suited her; but every time she was criticized she instantaneously transformed into a helpless victim. And that is exactly how feminism itself works: they are mutual exclusively self-referentially contradictory things at the same time.

This capacity to say things and believe things that simply fly in the face of any and all credibility should help inform you to try to comprehend how anyone could believe what follows:

The radical left insists that gender is a social construct and that’s just simply not true. So the scientific data on that are absolutely crystal clear. No reasonable scientist disagrees. And so they’re all foaming at the mouth because I’m poking holes in their cherished notions. And they like to think that people are completely malleable because that means that people can be made over in their ideological image.

Peterson points out that his views are “more common than you think,” stating that “My views on gender are shared widely in the personality community. Anyone who understands personality and is a credible scientist knows the difference between men and women in personality should be contributed primarily to biological factors. This isn’t contentious. The only people its’ contentious around are gender ideologues. They’ve already lost the scientific battle, so they’re taking it to the legislative front to enforce their views. So, they’re really not contentious viewpoints, they’re mainstream science. And we’re criticized all the time for spouting pseudo-science. It’s not pseudo-science; it’s mainstream science. And people who know the literature aren’t disputing this: it’s been known at least since the 1990s.

The Canadian government built a social-constructivist view of gender into the law. And that’s just incorrect. The idea that biological sex, gender expression, gender identity and sexual preference have no relationship to one another, that they vary independently, there’s almost nothing you can claim that’s more false than that. But now it’s being written into the law. It’s just patently absurd. It’s actually a telling commentary on the state of political discourse across the West, that something like that can actually happen. But I think that it’s equality of outcome that’s the real pathological desire. That’s the bad one.

Well then, Tucker asked, why are people whose views are not rooted in science, but instead in emotion and superstition, dominating our public conversation, and punishing anyone who doesn’t disagree? How did they get so much power?

Look, I actually think there’s a technical reason for that. It’s obvious that things can go too far on the right and they can go too far on the left. And it’s kind of easy to put a box around people who go too far on the right: you can just look at claim’s of racial superiority. But it’s not so easy to put a box around people who go too far on the left. There’s not a single thing you can point to that they do that has the same sort of red flag nature as claims of racial superiority. So it’s hard for people who are left-leaning, say I’m concerned with inequality and that sort of thing, to dissociate themselves from those who have clearly gone too far. And the problem is we really don’t know where the red flags are in leftist territory. Now for me it’s equality of outcome that is a good so-called equity. That’s a red flag. But it doesn’t seem as immediately pathological as claims of racial superiority. So it’s harder for people on the left to dissociate themselves from the people who, well, would do everyone in, essentially.

This “equality of outcome” has ALWAYS been THE most cherished goal of the most wicked ideology in the entire history of the human race. We’re all going to be so “equal” that we’ll all be equal in that we’ll all be JUST AS DEAD AS EVERYONE ELSE.

Pause in horror to consider the hell on earth Mao unleashed as he sought to impose the liberal dream and socialist goal of “equality of outcome” so everyone would be the same:

Chairman Mao:

“The atom bomb is nothing to be afraid of,” Mao told Nehru, “China has many people. . . . The deaths of ten or twenty million people is nothing to be afraid of.” A witness said Nehru showed shock. Later, speaking in Moscow, Mao displayed yet more generosity: he boasted that he was willing to lose 300 million people, half of China’s population.”

Chairman Mao:

LEE EDWARDS, CHAIRMAN, VICTIMS OF COMMUNISM MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: In 1959 to 1961 was the so-called “great leap forward” which was actually a gigantic leap backwards in which he tried to collectivize and communize agriculture.

And they came to him after the first year and they said, “Chairman, five million people have died of famine.” He said, “No matter, keep going.” In the second year, they came back and they said, “Ten million Chinese have died.” He said, “No matter, continue.” The third year, 20 million Chinese have died. And he said finally, “Well, perhaps this is not the best idea that I’ve ever had.”

CHANG: When he was told that, you know, his people were dying of starvation, Mao said, “Educate the peasants to eat less. Thus they can benefit – they can fertilize the land.”

Frankly, the fact of the matter is that Nazism itself came from the left: “NAZI” stood for “National Socialist German Workers Party.” You tell me if there was a “Socialist American Workers Party,” which side of the political spectrum it would be on? The fact of the matter is that the Nazis were a “rightwing” party ONLY in the sense that they were the “far right” of the whackjob hard core radical LEFT. Hitler and his Nazis were avowed Darwinists and just like Marx and the communists, the Nazis got their doctrines of hate from Darwinism. Hitler stated in the beginning of his rise to power that, “A stronger race will drive out the weaker ones, for the vital urge in its ultimate form will break down the absurd barriers of the so called humanity of individuals to make way for the humanity of nature which destroys the weak to give their place to the strong.” Pure Darwinism. Hitler stated as his Darwinian-survival-of-the-fittest-based Nazi regime was coming crashing down that, “If the German Volk is not strong enough and is not sufficiently prepared to offer its own blood for its existence, it should cease to exist and be destroyed by a stronger power.” As the disastrous war based on Darwinism came to a vicious end, Hitler issued what has infamously become known as his “Nero Decree,” saying, “There is no […] need to worry about saving what is necessary for the German people to survive. … On the contrary, it is much better that we ourselves destroy everything. […] Our people has shown that it is the weakest; the future belongs exclusively to the people of the east, which is the strongest.” All of these statements are Darwinian to the core. Just as was the garbage about purifying the race so that the German Arian would be the strongest and most dominant race. Hearken to Darwin’s less-famous subtitle for his “Origin of the Species:” “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.”

The principle rationale for the Holocaust was that the Jews were biologically inferior, and interfered with the Nazi scientists’ efforts to aid evolution by creating a master race.
Listen to these words and tell me who wrote them:

“At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.”

It was none other than Charles Darwin himself (Darwin, C.R., “The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex,” [1871], John Murray: London, 1874, Second Edition, 1922, reprint, pp.241-242). Charles Darwin literally predicted that someone would come along and extend his Darwinism to its logical conclusion – and thus literally predicted both the Holocaust AND the motivations FOR the Holocaust. Charles Darwin spake as a prophet, and Adolf Hitler was the messiah who fulfilled the demonic prophecy. But it wasn’t just the Jew that Hitler was willing to exterminate as being “biologically inferior.” Adolf Hitler – who had made the Holocaust of the “biologically unfit” and “sub human” Jew the centerpiece of his campaign to create a “Master” Aryan race – ultimately made his “master race” the victim of his hateful Darwinian views. The simple fadt of the matter is that Adolf Hitler thought in entirely Darwinian terms and his total war was an example of Darwinian survival of the fittest in action. He decreed the Jew had failed the test of Darwinism, and ultimately believed that if the German people could not prevail in his war that THEY TOO should be exterminated and replaced by a more fit race just as Darwinism taught.

And this atheist and Darwinist crap is all pumped out of the vile soul of the ideological LEFT. The left has followed the same script that the communists gave them: identify what people realize is evil and demonize their ideological opponents for it – even though they practice the very identical same evil themselves; and even in fact when they are the ONLY ONES who practice that evil. So the left says the Nazis were “right wing” because they were militaristic, demonically ignoring the fact that the largest militaries ever assembled were assembled by COMMUNISTS. Think of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. whose military dwarfed our own; think the People’s Republic of China; think of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. No one other than a fool or a liar would claim that “militarism” is “right wing.” Similarly, they claim that “nationalism” makes a regime right wing, again demonically ignoring the fact that throughout his fight against Hitler, Stalin miraculously transformed his communism into nationalism, urging his people to fight for “Mother Russia” again and again and again. And today for that matter, the communist People’s Republic of China is FIERCELY nationalistic and is economically employing a model far more similar to socialist fascism that pure communism. Or they will with straight faces lecture us that the Nazis were “right wing” because they were “racist.” Again, the model of demonizing whatever is most evil as belonging exclusively to their ideological enemies. The U.S.S.R. murdered tens of millions of non-Russian people; today the Chinese still persecute non-Chinese ethnic peoples such as the Tibetans. Our own “progressive left” in the United States has frequently employed hard core racism, and I still remember a leftist SEIU union head telling his very own union workers as “so fucking rabidly racist.” In my very own family, one of the few rabid Democrats in 2008 refused to vote for Barack Obama. Why? Because he said, “I won’t vote for that fucking nigger.” When I would have happily voted for Herman Cain, or later for Ben Carson.

I still remember a true ideological coward named Barack Hussein Obama dishonestly, vindictively and hypocritically attacking the Republicans as being “social Darwinists.” When he himself is the true Darwinist. Social Darwinism is logically and morally ENTAILED if Darwinism is true because the weak die out and the most fit survive. And if that is true in the whole cosmos, then without any logical or moral question it would necessarily be true of any society that correctly followed this universal law of the universe. Evolution and Darwinism logically and consistently applied would apply as an axiom the policy that the weak need to perish so the stronger can better survive, end of story. But to be a Democrat is to be the worst and the most despicable kind of moral coward. They constantly play the rhetorical game of deceiving people that they don’t believe what they clearly believe. And so Democrats believe in evolution while simultaneously implicitly recognizing that theirs is an utterly evil ideology. Stalin murdered at least forty million of his own people and Mao murdered as many as eighty million of his own people: but neither did so until they had total power over their people and until they had that total control abetted by leftist gun seizure laws that left the people weaponless and defenseless they constantly talked about how they cared about the people.

But not even the most ardently ideological, the most whackjob Nazi, Maoist or Stalinist, ever dared to dream that we could screw around with the very nature of gender and sexual identity. That required a level of shocking human depravity that dwarfed even the most wild imaginings of even these most wicked bugs.

As of today, Democrats are directly responsible for the mass murder of SIXTY MILLION of THE most innocent human beings in their abortion mills. Democrats will one day stand before God condemned as being ten times more evil than the damn Nazis; and every single Democrat will scream in the agony of the lowest pit of hell for a trillion times a trillion millennia for every single NANOSECOND that they callously ripped from these 60 million babies employing the same damned-by-God “logic” that the Nazis employed arguing that Jews weren’t fully human and therefore could be exterminated.

Abortion is a war of extermination not just against babies, but more directly against FATHERHOOD. If that baby in the womb isn’t a baby, isn’t a human being, then what the hell IS a “father”??? What the hell did he “father”??? A lifeless lump of goop, Democrats assure us. A thing that can be exterminated without thought or consequences, they assure us. If that is in any way true, then any father can simply walk away from his kid without any thought or any consequence just as easily as any mother can murder the innocent human life growing in her womb as a result of what she and that father participated in creating.

The Democrat Party has made war on fathers and on fatherhood for a generation now. And it is amazing how sick and toxic a place they have “fundamentally transformed” our society into as a direct result of their war on fatherhood, their war on children, their hell on earth policies that every single one of them will one day have to stand before God Almighty and give an account for.

And if you’re going to go to total, Hitler-style war-of-extermination-style wars on fatherhood and fathers and children, well, in bowling-analogy terms you’ve simply got to try to pick up the spare and similarly declare total war on so-called “toxic masculinity” and on boys.

It is frankly a truly amazing thing that has the left screeches about the crisis of “toxic masculinity,” in actual scientific fact men’s sperm counts have quite literally PLUMMETED. “Sperm counts dropped by more than half over nearly four decades,” a massive scientific study recently found. Which is to say to whatever extent there IS a crisis of “toxic masculinity,” it is quite literally the very OPPOSITE of what the left falsely claims it is. What is in actual scientific fact “toxic” is that males AREN’T getting more masculine; they are getting less and less and LESS so. Here’s the ACTUAL crisis of toxic masculinity:

The assessment, one of the largest ever undertaken, brings together the results of 185 studies between 1973 and 2011.

Dr Levine, an epidemiologist, told the BBC that if the trend continued humans would become extinct.

Liberalism is a mindless phenomenon, just as a colony of roaches is a mindless phenomenon. These bugs will just do what they do. They will not quit. They have been programmed to mindlessly advance much the way Mao’s communist army mindlessly charged the U.S. military at the Chosin Reservoir in Korea in 1950. And if these leftist ideologues fail to charge screaming machine-gun toting commissars will gun them down from behind. Because the left only wants to seize guns from the people, not from the commissar-class who gets to control the people. The left will not stop until males are extinct and the last feminist triumphantly dances on the last male’s grave, freed from the God-given burden of bringing the last baby into the world. THAT is the assured result of liberalism, the cherished goal, the dream.

As the REAL toxic crap from leftist ideologues calling themselves “educators” persecuted boys and demonized maleness and manhood and basically indoctrinated a culture of boys being ashamed to be what they were biologically – even as the same rabid fools dismissed the very notion of “biology” itself in their Stalinist rather than scientific assessment that gender is a social construct – boys have simply been first falling behind, then dropping behind, then dropping out. The left is literally targeting and attacking as unacceptable even the very words “man” and “male,” let alone being a man or being encouraged or even allowed to ACT like one. As an example, the widely-used online writing and grammar resource by Purdue University encourages college students to avoid ‘generic use of MAN and other words with masculine markers.’

And as a result of this war, the very group that denies the reality of biology has created a species-threatening biological reality. We have diminished sperm counts. That is NOT a sign of masculinity, but rather the exact freaking OPPOSITE. But that’s just reality, and liberalism is a rabid denial of reality.

And yes, the sad, assured result of these liberal policies which have utterly destroyed the American middle class primarily by destroying men, young men are increasingly becoming bitter, resentful, angry. And they are increasingly acting out. And that means more and more violence. Because males have been treated like animals and what the hell do you expect animals to do???

Yeah. The left went too far. WAY too far.

The only problem is that the time to stop them was nearly forty years ago. Because everything that has followed since Roe v. Wade in 1973 was the equivalent of a snowball running downhill until it became an avalanche.

So I’m reading my paper and seeing all the butthurt and anger over the fact that a researcher named Aleksandr Kogan gave a research company named Cambridge Analytica access Facebook users’ data. Which used that data to help Donald Trump win the presidential election. And Facebook is now claiming that Cambridge Analytica had “violated its rules” and suspended them. But now, the entire planet is alarmed that Facebook is armed with so much data on so many of its addicted users and that it might actually give such information to a Republican presidential campaign to help them win. I mean, its truly evil.

And so now Facebook’s stock has plummeted to the tune of a $40 billion loss and Mark Zuckerberg is out confessing how terribly wrong it is hoping to avoid regulation the way the makers of other highly addictive products are regulated and the way other monopolies are regulated. And authorities are climbing all over Cambridge Analytica for its worse-than-what-the-Nazis-did crime against humanity.

Personally, I would be thrilled if Facebook and Google were broken up. But that would require the political left being morally consistent for once in its roach-collective existence, and that will never happen.

But here’s the rub: Facebook did the exact same thing back in the 2012 campaign and helped Obama win.

Townhall – in an article titled, “Former Obama Staffer: Facebook Allowed Us To Break User Data Rules Because They Were On Our Side,” put it this way:

Well, one former data officer for the Obama campaign, Carol Davidsen, admitted that Facebook allowed them to break the rules because they were on their side.
First, she tweeted a Time magazine piece showing what the 2012 campaign did to gather information:

In the final weeks before Election Day, a scary statistic emerged from the databases at Barack Obama’s Chicago headquarters: half the campaign’s targeted swing-state voters under age 29 had no listed phone number. They lived in the cellular shadows, effectively immune to traditional get-out-the-vote efforts.
For a campaign dependent on a big youth turnout, this could have been a crisis. But the Obama team had a solution in place: a Facebook application that will transform the way campaigns are conducted in the future. For supporters, the app appeared to be just another way to digitally connect to the campaign. But to the Windy City number crunchers, it was a game changer. “I think this will wind up being the most groundbreaking piece of technology developed for this campaign,” says Teddy Goff, the Obama campaign’s digital director.

That’s because the more than 1 million Obama backers who signed up for the app gave the campaign permission to look at their Facebook friend lists. In an instant, the campaign had a way to see the hidden young voters. Roughly 85% of those without a listed phone number could be found in the uploaded friend lists. What’s more, Facebook offered an ideal way to reach them. “People don’t trust campaigns. They don’t even trust media organizations,” says Goff. “Who do they trust? Their friends.”

Davidsen then detailed on Twitter how representatives from the social media company were surprised how much data they mined, adding that they were “very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side.”

And Townhall didn’t merely make up an “unnamed source” the way the leftist media gets their sources for their fake news hit pieces on Trump; they actually posted former Obama campaign director Carol Davidsen’s own words:

So Obama’s 2012 campaign director publicly stated that the Facebook crack dealers “were very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side.” She said that Facebook was surprised that Obama roaches “were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn’t stop us once they realized that was what we were doing.”

FACT: The Obama campaign harvested user data from MILLIONS of Facebook users in the 2012 campaign. It literally gave Obama victory.

FACT: none oft he people who are so rabid and so angry and so bitter gave a flying damn that Obama did the very thing that is so terrible and so inexcusable and so evil now.

FACT: Facebook even benignly assisted Obama, as opposed to merely not realizing that one of its researchers had done for a pro-Trump organization what the entire organization had done for Obama.

FACT: to be a liberal is to be the very worst manner of hypocrite vermin there is; to be a liberal means to be a being incapable of virtue, or integrity, or honesty, or decency, or any kind of good thing whatsoever.

One of the lines that I have borrowed from radio talk show host Dennis Prager is this: “I prefer clarity to agreement,” which means that I would rather we both honestly understand one another’s true positions even when we fundamentally disagree with one another than that we come to some misleading politically-worded compromise following a “dialogue.”

I came across the following today and thought it worth posting. The author is a Democrat politician and clearly reveals his own personal bias at the outset. But he also points out that even his own side has “routinely disappointed” him and then proceeds to offer five very fair questions for both sides in the gun control debate. I will interact with him on the questions he poses for my position, in which I state my own bias that the 2nd Amendment exists for a very important reason and that as long as we intend to remain in any meaningful way connected to our Constitution, we need to safeguard the right for citizens to keep and bear arms and fight efforts to infringe on that right:

My father was murdered by a handgun-wielding assailant, so the firearms debate is personal for me. And I’m routinely disappointed by how disingenuous it is on both sides. I worry that each party just wants to mobilize its base and raise campaign funds rather than solve tough policy problems.

Next time you hear a politician offer a simplistic solution, here are some questions to ask.

If the politician favors gun control:

1. What will tougher laws accomplish when there are already roughly two guns in circulation for every American adult? Are you proposing the mass seizure of firearms? It’s not just the 2nd Amendment that’s at issue, but the 5th, which prohibits the taking of private property without compensation.
2. You say you favor an “assault weapon” ban, but most murders in the U.S. are committed using handguns. Do you have a separate plan to address handgun violence (which occurs daily)?

3. For that matter, do you realize that there is no sound legal or technical definition of an “assault weapon?” The 1994 ban, which expired in 2004, was rife with loopholes. Rather than political catchwords, explain your intentions using terms that have a precise meaning, like “semiautomatic.”
4. You’ve suggested that the 2nd Amendment should be read to protect only the muskets and rudimentary rifles extant at the time the Constitution was drafted. Do you realize how problematic this logic is? Do you believe the 1st Amendment should protect print newspapers but not television broadcasts, web-based journalism, or social-media posts?
5. The Constitution belongs to the people of the United States, and if the requisite supermajorities agree, the people can amend it to reflect changing mores. So have the guts to be honest: Do you believe we should repeal the 2nd Amendment?

If the politician does not favor gun control:

1. You’ve offered “thoughts and prayers” for the victims. Do you realize how trite that sounds? Could you please take the initiative to change your phrasing once in a while? And is there anything besides thinking and praying that you believe you can do?
2. You say you believe the solution is not to pass more gun laws, but to enforce the ones we already have on the books. So what have you done to insist that the relevant agencies do just that?
3. According to the National Rifle Assn., only a good guy with a gun can stop a bad guy with a gun. You’ve extended that logic to schools, advocating that we arm teachers. But most mass shootings happen so fast, there isn’t much time to react. I can’t imagine my first-grade teacher stopping a determined killer, and I don’t believe parents want schools to look like prisons. Besides, is it fair to turn teachers into security guards? Do you really believe arming educators is the solution?
4. The 2nd Amendment confers a right to bear arms, but no constitutional right, even free speech, is absolute. So if you make blanket statements about the 2nd Amendment, why don’t you tell us where you draw the line?
5. Background checks won’t end gun violence. But they can stop a portion of the mentally ill population (or criminals or domestic abusers) from purchasing guns legally. How can you argue that a better system won’t prevent at least some crimes?
Even under pressure, I fear politicians on both sides are neither honest nor realistic on this issue.
But here’s what we can do. The low-hanging fruit if we want to lower rates of gun violence is to address drug use and mental health problems. Large percentages of those incarcerated for violent crimes committed those acts under the influence of drugs or to obtain money to buy drugs. And a large percentage of mass shooters are mentally ill. So try to notice the signs of mental illness and addiction, and do whatever possible to get friends and family the help they need.
Meanwhile, by all means, ask politicians those tough questions.

Mike Gatto, a Democrat, served four terms in the California Assembly. He is an attorney and legislator in residence at USC’s Unruh Institute of Politics. Twitter: @mikegatto

I have not met Mike Gatto and frankly have never heard of him. But I have respect for this man because I believe he tries to be equally tough on both sides in this debate and I have the sense that he too prefers clarity to bogus agreements that are nothing but words loaded with loopholes intended to deceive the public into believing that something was done when in fact it wasn’t.

I will deal with Mike Gatto’s “If the politician does not favor gun control” point-by-point:

FIRST, “thoughts” are surely trite, but “prayers” are not to anyone who believes in God and believes that He created us in His image and loves us. Is this an open acknowledgement that Democrats don’t believe in God or in the power of prayer? Because it frankly seems obvious to me at this point that the Democratic Party has radically turned into a secular humanist party and “God” is a nice-sounding thing for these people to say much the way Adolf Hitler referred to God and Christianity as a cynical way to cloak a clearly ungodly thing with the language of pseudo-religiousity.

But having stated that, let me proceed from there: we are at an impossible point with the mainstream Democrat Party – by which I now mean radically liberal (when even the reliably liberal Dianne Feinstein is not NEARLY “liberal” enough for this radical Democratic Party today) – in which they very CLEARLY want to first erode and undermine and ultimately strip the 2nd Amendment of having any actual force or meaning. And so in this climate, every single thing we give them is simply one step closer to what I truly believe is a fascist goal: every single on of the 22 former totalitarian communist regimes and currently including the five current totalitarian communist regimes stripped their people of the right to keep and bear arms. Every single one of them. And when 82% of communist countries are “former” communist countries, I submit that this is just one of many powerful evidences that this system does not work. Adolf Hitler stated, “The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subjugated races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subjugated races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police.” This is the clear totalitarian mindset, to strip people who could be a threat to your regime – such as the people you intend to work to death in death camps – to have access to weapons to fight back against tyranny.

The framers of the Constitution enshrined the 1st Amendment first because free speech which is the heart of all true freedom was their most cherished goal; and they enshrined the 2nd Amendment right after it because they correctly viewed the right of the individual to keep and bear arms as the greatest safeguard of the 1st Amendment. The 2nd Amendment was a reaction against government tyranny.

But let me get back to the paragraph that precedes the immediately above: we are seeing our society devolve – I believe because of the secular humanism and atheism and the abortion mentality that have created a zeitgeist of nihilism. Nothing is sacred, there is no ultimate judgment, and if I am unhappy there is no reason why I shouldn’t “exercise my right to choose” and “my right to my own body” and start killing as many people as I can just like I learned to do on television programs and movies and video games created by liberals have taught me to do. They have desensitized us to violence because they claimed they had a right to do that even when no, they did NOT have such a right! And now they want to take away the most necessary rights that were guaranteed by our Constitution. Sixty million innocent human beings are now dead, making the Democratic Party ten times more murderous than were the Nazis with the Jews in the Holocaust. Democrats have an absolutely morally vicious agenda. And so, even as Democrats have in fact caused people to become more violent by taking away God and divine morality, I still prefer the violence that they have unleashed to the greater violence they surely WILL unleash in the years that would follow when I wouldn’t have the means to resist them when they come after me the same way Hitler came after Jews and Democrats came after babies.

And so when every single “gun control” measure is merely one more small step toward the giant step for repealing the 2nd Amendment (just like Lenin and Stalin did, just like Hitler did, just like Chairman Mao did, just like the Kim dynasty did), I will fight it tooth and nail. It comes down to this: if you want us to come your way with more common-sense gun control measures, then YOU have to come our way with more definitive pro-2nd Amendment measures. As long as any repeal of the 2nd Amendment is on the damn table, as long as Democrat activists are allowed to keep agitating to something that Hitler and Stalin and Mao failed to be able to do in this country, as you keep hysterically screaming that we need to “do something” no matter how irrational and useless that something is.

In other words, Mike Gatto’s number 2 FAR more applies to Democrats than it does to Republicans. Don’t you DARE pin that on us. As Jesus put it, look at the damn log in your OWN eye before you mention the speck in mine. So there are actually SIX objections to gun control that Democrats have to answer and only four we have to respond to – EVEN FROM A LIBERAL.

THIRD, are you seriously trying to claim that since gun violence can happen quickly, that there is therefore no reason to try to react to that violence as quickly as possible? There isn’t much time to react, so let’s not react at all. That would be insane, but that is your prima facie argument. No, let’s react. Let’s get that good guy with a gun in as quickly as humanly possible to stop any bad guy with a gun. If you’re going to lecture me that the only way to deal with this is to take away everybody’s right to own a gun as the only possible way to deal with the possibility of a bad guy getting a gun, please refer to the Constitution. That is not an option. And a far better option that actually IS Constitutional is to end “gun free zones” given the fact that 98% of all mass shootings in our history have happened in gun free zones. There’s a reason psychos are attracted to gun free zones for the same reason that there’s a reason that burglars don’t enter homes with the owner pointing shotguns at their faces. Like the death penalty that Democrats refuse to allow, armed citizens is a deterrent to tyranny. It simply is. And so, no, while I am not demanding that every single 1st grade teacher strap a .44 magnum to their belts, I AM saying that there surely ARE teachers and staff members who would be willing to be armed to protect their children.

This argument that “I am a teacher and teaching is fundamentally incompatible with protecting children” is again frankly morally insane. I frankly would prefer a teacher who would be willing to protect me to one who militantly refuses to protect me. Yes, please give me the teacher who loves his or her students enough to protect them. And the state of Texas is just one state that believe it or not already found that yes there are TOO teachers who are willing to protect their students.

We can install metal detectors and that would do some good. But when you start paying full-time active-duty police officers to be on site at a school all day, you will drive up the cost of education. And maybe homeschooling kids is then the best option and we should simply fire all ya’all teachers if you won’t lift a finger to protect kids and teach our children in the safety of our homes since you insist on remaining a gun-free zone where 98% of all shootings have happened.

So yes, it IS fair to turn our teachers into security guards. At least if they’re going to claim that they care about their kids rather than their damn leftist Stalinist ideology. Okay?

Or maybe an even MORE unacceptable alternative to these same leftist teachers is that they return to teaching about God and about the divine morality that we used to teach back in the day when our schools weren’t shooting galleries????

FOURTH, this idea that “the 2nd Amendment isn’t absolute” is actually quite laughable when you consider something called “facts.” You see, I happen to know that we already have ALL DAMN KINDS OF LIMITS on the 2nd Amendment. Or else, for instance, I’d have a damned machine gun and I’d be free to shoot any liberal who pissed me off. We have at least TEN MAJOR FEDERAL GUN LAWS not to mention the thousands of state gun laws.

But here’s the funny thing, since you don’t believe in “absolute rights” then I’m glad to hear you’re willing to have a Voter ID card!!!! No? Because you actually DO believe in “absolute rights” even for illegal immigrants and even for felons???? Hey, Nazis, did you know the Nazi Party was ELECTED by voters???? Did you know that the Palestinian people used their right to vote to elect a terrorist group as their leaders????

The fact is that we conservatives and even we conservative NRA members are FAR more likely to limit the right to keep and bear arms than you have been with all your wicked rights. Capeesh????

I’ll take to you about sensible limits on guns the day AFTER you stop believing that any of your fellow liberals should have any right to believe you have “absolute rights,” let alone the absolute right to keep seeking to take away my constitutionally enshrined rights even as you invent right after right after right to murder your own babies, practice immoral and depraved behaviors, etc.

FIFTH, background checks. We’ve already got them, flying in the face of your frankly incredibly ridiculous argument number 4. above. But at this point, we aren’t allowed to go into somebody’s medical records because fascist liberal judges who dreamed of a world with 60 million murdered babies in America invented “the right to privacy.” At least, unless I want to be “private” about my 2nd Amendment RIGHT which unlike the “right” to abortion actually IS a right.

Hey, Democrat, my mental health is as much a private matter between me and my doctor as your abortion is a private matter between you and your doctor. I’m crazy and you’re a murderer and we’re both about to do something truly evil and take another human being’s life.

And maybe you moral monsters should end this vicious cycle.

So let’s END abortion privacy rights which would cause the “right” to abortion to topple like a rotten, termite-infested foundation that it is. And then we can go into the medical records of people requesting to buy a gun and say, “Wait a minute! This man is NUTS! Oh, HELL no!”

So Democrats, being fascist hypocrites, of course want “the right to privacy” to murder babies, but they want to take away the same right so they can take away the 2nd Amendment. Bullcrap. Just bullcrap.

But until then, let us understand that liberals gave the next shooter the right to privacy, the right to choose, the freedom over his own body. And their acts are merely retroactive abortions.

On these issues, kindly deal with the great big fat giant logs in your own eyes, Democrats.

I didn’t register for Selective Services when I turned 18 as the law has required for now over a hundred years. Do you know why? Because I was already enlisted in the United States Army, that’s why. And when I was in boot camp looking at all the newly shaved heads around me, do you know what I saw? A whole lot of other 18-year olds.

Those 18-, 19- and 2-year olds form a giant chunk of our military. Did you know that? How about this one: 36.9% of our Marines are 21 or under. If we didn’t have these “kids” bearing arms, we wouldn’t have the guys who rush enemy positions. Not unless YOU’RE going to do it, you weak, limpy old fool.

But just stop and think about the logic for a second: let’s decide that people under 21 can’t have a gun because they’re not responsible enough. Except for the military where they have proven for a thousand generations that yes, they ARE responsible enough and in fact we need the flower of our youth to be armed so they can fight our battles for us.

I was 18-years old with an assault rifle; I was 19-years old with an assault rifle; I was 20-years old with an assault rifle. And not your dumbass fake-news “assault weapon,” but an actual assault rifle capable of fully automatic weapons fire. The term “assault weapon,” by contrast, is a purely leftist and media and Democrat Party created fake news. “Assault weapons” in fact do not actually exist. It is an arbitrary, aesthetic manufactured meme. A sporting rifle with a walnut stock is just another garden variety sporting rifle; take that walnut stock off and replace it with a black plastic one with an L-shaped grip and presto bismo you suddenly have an “assault weapon.” The actual characteristics of the rifle remain unchanged.

Further, assault rifles (and the so-called “assault weapons” marketed on the design concept) are chambered in far less powerful cartridges than most other sporting rifles. And the assault weapons favored by the left for demagoguery are actually far less lethal than other rifles. I happen to own a Browning BAR in .300 Winchester Magnum. And yeah, I know it’s not an “assault weapon” because it has that beautiful walnut stock on it! Do you know how devastatingly powerful that sucker is compared to an “assault weapon”? Compare between 3,600 foot-pounds of muzzle energy and a 1,500 meter maximum effective range for the 300 Winchester Magnum versus 1,600 foot-pounds and a 550 meter maximum effective range for the .223 caliber “assault weapon.” Back in World War II, the average soldier carried his M-1 which chambered a .30-06 round; again, the actual ballistics favor the M-1 over the “assault rifle” by amazing levels: again, a thousand-yard gun with twice the energy of an “assault weapon.” This “debate” is based on pure demagoguery at its very most cynical, disingenuous, dishonest level.

And my actual assault rifle was also sans bump stock. A rifle needs to be held securely and firmly against the shoulder in order to be accurately fired. Anybody who knows a damned thing about rifles knows that. But a bump stock requires a loose shoulder hold that creates the rattle to rapidly depress the trigger. And that affects accuracy in a way that simply doesn’t exist with true assault rifles that are designed for select-fire. A bump stock reduces your accuracy to virtually nothing. Stephen Paddock was able to shoot into a giant crowd, but otherwise he couldn’t have hit the broad side of a barn with that stupid gadget. I’m all in favor of banning bump stocks simply because they are a novelty that make guns less effective rather than more effective. Me, I was entrusted with an actual assault rifle! And I carried that weapon for every single American citizen! And guess what else I had? Large magazines to carry lots of firepower. And every single day of my service I proved that I was capable of bearing arms in a responsible manner for the good of my society and my country.

The reason the left hates me so much is because I am a living refutation of their lies: I not only carried these weapons, and carried them in a responsible manner, but carried them to the benefit of my country. As do millions of other responsible gun owners who use these weapons safely and responsibly.

If you ban “kids” from having these weapons, you might as well just ban the United States Marine Corps altogether. It’s a damn shame. No enemy on earth could defeat our Marines; except for despicable, pathetic, gutless, miserable liberalism and the pure moral stupidity and spirit of cowardice that permeates our nation because of these jackass fools.

But I’ll tell you what: if kids aren’t responsible enough to own weapons or fight in our military, then you snot-nosed little dumbasses are hardly responsible enough to do the most responsible thing one can do in our democratic society and VOTE. No own who can’t have an assault weapon should be trusted to vote, either.

What is interesting is that WE ALREADY TRIED this “assault weapons” ban thing. For ten years we did this starting with Bill Clinton in 1994. Which by the way was the very act of government fascist tyranny that began the movement for Americans to start buying more guns lest their rights be usurped from them that I referred to above. And do you know the effect the “assault weapons ban” had??? ZERO.

So I’m actually all in FAVOR of taking guns away. By removing the right to own guns from the political party that wants to have them banned in the damn first place. Because this would be a vastly safer nation if we just gave them what they wanted and took their guns away from them while those of us who know that we are responsible kept our 2nd Amendment right and used that right to safeguard our freedom.

Getting back to my main argument, and removing “assault weapons” from people under 21, what is frankly amazing in its hypocrisy is that the left – the liberal mainstream media and the Democratic Party – are trotting out and touting all these angry teenagers who have just been traumatized as being the very smartest, wisest and best informed liberals whom we should therefore listen to. But here’s the damn thing: by their very own “logic” these kids aren’t psychologically or emotionally capable of handling this issue – because they’re saying none of these whiny little fools ought to be trusted with guns in the first place!!! Which means I can simply tune you whiny little ignorant punks out. Again, this is demagoguery at its very lowest level.

It was the left, it was liberalism, it was secular progressive humanistic atheism, that has created this horrible vacuum in which people are beginning to increasingly say, “I’m miserable and since we all just ‘evolved’ from pond slime there is no true, ultimate purpose, no real, ultimate value and no genuine, ultimate meaning and therefore my life doesn’t matter and therefore nobody else’s life matters and so what I’m about to do is nothing more than a mass retro-active abortion.

Hearken to the words of Blaise Pascal:

“What else does this craving, and this helplessness, proclaim but that there was once in man a true happiness, of which all that now remains is the empty print and trace? This he tries in vain to fill with everything around him, seeking in things that are not there the help he cannot find in those that are, though none can help, since this infinite abyss can be filled only with an infinite and immutable object; in other words by God himself.” – Blaise Pascal, Pensées VII(425)

That “God-shaped” hole has been filled with something that is most definitely UNGODLY and the hole will get uglier and uglier until we turn away from liberalism and fill the hole in our soul with the God who formed us in His image to be morally and spiritually accountable to Him as He fulfills His plan for us in our lives. If we don’t have God, we’re going to have something else. And now we’re finding out what that “else” is.

First of all, if the 2nd Amendment is a “limited” right, then ALL of our other constitutionally guaranteed rights are also “limited.” I have to love it that the same people who want to “limit” the 2nd Amendment rabidly demand that there be no limits whatsoever to “the right to vote,” including not only convicted felons but now even also to illegal immigrants. If you are even considering “limiting” the 2nd Amendment and you are not for voter ID laws, then you are simply somebody to disregard as an ideologue. The fact of the matter is that “the right to vote” is an obviously dangerous thing, unless you happen to believe that the rise of the Nazi Party that was ELECTED is not a dangerous thing. In another example, recently the Palestinians elected a TERRORIST GROUP to power. Further, since we’re largely talking about illegal immigrants from Mexico when we discuss voter ID, let’s not forget the fact that in Mexico, if you do not have a voter ID, YOU DO NOT GET TO VOTE.

Now, one of the reasons I mention “illegal immigrants” is the fact that the shooter – Nikolas Cruz – IS HISPANIC. Liberals snarl that if we were disarmed from having “assault weapons” he wouldn’t have been able to pull this off. But how about this one: if we didn’t have HISPANICS he wouldn’t have been able to pull this off, either. If you’re going to ban the one, let’s ban the other. Otherwise you might start getting reasonable and realize that we have tens of millions of these weapons in the hands of decent, law-abiding people and just maybe we shouldn’t target all of them because of the actions of one miserable whackjob. But otherwise, let’s turn as much rage and hate on Hispanics for being Hispanic as we do on “assault weapons” for being “assault weapons.” Because, news flash, fools, that rifle Cruz used did NOT squeeze its own trigger. Cruz squeezed it and kept squeezing it.

What’s really funny – in the ironic sense of moral idiots who refuse to learn from history – is that we’ve already TRIED this and IT DID NOT DO A DAMN THING. Democrats banned what they created the term “assault weapons” (to mimic the military term assault rifle referring to a weapon capable of full as well as semi-automatic fire in order to artificially create a false equivalence between the two) and it had no impact on crime or violence. None. That’s why we don’t have it anymore. It lapsed, having been nothing more than a deprivation of the rights of millions of Americans.

What liberals want is to create and then keep taking us down a slippery slope, such that if the “assault weapons” ban (which is already a proven failure) fails again, well, we just need to keep banning more stuff, like handguns.

For those liberals in favor of applying limits to the 2nd Amendment, I simply ask you, what can I ban that YOU believe is a critical and fundamental right, given that you want to take away my right to defend myself and my family?

Here’s another one: the way the left wants to blame gun owners and people who advocate for the 2nd Amendment every time a gun is used to kill someone, please to explain why the hell we can’t demonize YOU in any jurisdiction with tough gun laws when a victim is first rendered defenseless and then a vicious predator comes in and attacks?

How about this little factoid from USA Today:

Killers continue targeting locations where guns are not allowed. Ninety-eight percent of public mass shootings in this country occur in gun-free zones — the Florida school being one of them.

How about if we start screaming that we need to purge the world of all proponents of gun-free zones so that we can be SAFE??? We need to BAN gun-free zones and criminally prosecute anybody who supports them.

Here’s another fact:

that 81% of police officers support arming teachers and principals, so that the real first responders — the potential victims — can protect the children.

Let’s BAN anybody who doesn’t believe in arming guards and teachers and even volunteer parents who are willing to pass background checks and have required training so we can protect our children on our schools.

It is a fact proven in every single situation we have faced that these mass shootings stop the moment a good guy with a gun shows up. A whopping majority of the time the killers kill themselves. Which kind of proves that guns aren’t evil; guns are tools. People are evil. And so if you’re going to start banning, ban people.

But, oh wait, liberals are already doing that. It’s called “abortion” and liberals have already banned 60 million people from having a right to live.

We talk about DACA and these poor, poor DACA kids who were brought here through no fault of their own and that means they should have a right to live here. Okay, fine. As long as you realize that 60 million times now liberals have ignored the very logic of their own hypocritical belief and kill innocent human beings who were brought into the world through no fault of their own.

Nikolas Cruz exercised his “right to choose” and his “right to his own body” and retroactively aborted 17 people. Abortion is death. And we now have a culture of death. And we ought to ban everybody who has in any way, shape or form contributed to this evil zeitgeist.

Fifty years ago there were more guns per capita in American hands than there are today. Fifty years ago we also had far fewer anti-gun laws and regulations and restrictions than we have today. THE KILLINGS WE ARE SEEING TODAY ARE NOT BECAUSE OF GUNS and anyone who isn’t a fool immediately realizes that something ELSE has changed. THE KILLINGS WE ARE SEEING TODAY ARE DUE TO GODLESSNESS.

Fifty years ago we believed in God and taught divine morality and therefore we believed in the soul and the sanctity of human life. We rejected “abortion morality” and the belief that innocent human beings could be exterminated like bugs. We are now talking about every single liberal being ten times more guilty of mass murder than the damn NAZIS.

And I’ll just say that if you believe in abortion and you believe in gun control, I’ll just quote your ideological buddy Adolf Hitler who said, “To conquer a nation, first disarm its citizens.” Along with Stalin. Along with Mao. Along with Castro and Pol Pot and Kim Jong-un. Because you are following the same damn pathway to hell on earth and somebody needs to ban your vile ass fast.

We have ALWAYS been a gun-culture in America because we have always been a FREE society and the most basic tenet of true freedom is to be allowed to have the damn right and freedom to protect yourself and what is yours from anyone who would try to take it. There are people, socialists, communists, atheists (who don’t believe in the soul and therefore cannot have any doctrine of free will given that they are forced to believe we are meat puppets who think the way we do simply because the molecules in our brains randomly happened to arrange themselves a certain way), liberals and Democrats, who do not believe in freedom. And these people who deny our freedom need to be banned.

Atheism and the communism atheism ultimately logically entails is without any question whatsoever THE most murderous worldview of any that has ever contaminated the human species. And atheism needs to be banned and atheists and communists alike need to be banned.

Let me simply point out that generals have always known that most human beings and most soldiers simply will not kill other human beings without a great deal of conditioning. And the primary barrier to killing has always been religious faith and the belief that this “enemy” is in fact a human being created in God’s image just like me. Amazingly, one small change was enough to dramatically increase American soldiers’ willingness to aim a rifle at an enemy and pull the trigger. During the Vietnam War, human-shaped sillouhettes were introduced. And soldiers became more conditioned to kill.

Today, our secular humanist atheism has spawned savage, vicious, vile video games that are to the human-shaped sillouhette what the atomic bomb is to a spear. Atheism and the ramifications of atheism has spawned this culture of death that we are now haunted by FAR more than we are haunted by guns that by themselves have never once so much as harmed anybody because it takes hate to pull the trigger.

And they need to have their asses BANNED because you yourself are participating in their murders if you DON’T ban them.

If we can limit constitutional rights and specifically limit certain components of those rights, we can certainly isolate out and limit atheism from the panoply of religious rights and ban atheism and the ugly worldview of hate and meaningless, murderous rampages straight to the hell it came from. So let’s do it.

But don’t believe me. Believe your fellow liberal traveler, CBS vice president and senior legal counsel Hayley Geftman-Gold who posted after an atheist gunned down 500 mostly conservative and Christian country music fans in Las Vegas:

We need to BAN liberal bias in our newsrooms and if they won’t ban these “reporters” and these “journalists” who are propagandists, we need to ban the entire publication. BAN IT. Because if you can ban the 2nd Amendment, you can ban the media. And damn you if you don’t, you hypocrites.

This punk turd, Nikolas Cruz, should never have been allowed to have any kind of gun. That is a fact that nobody is arguing. If you have something from the NRA saying that Nikolas Cruz should have had his guns, then let’s see it. This isn’t about guns. This is about a massive failure in a system that is broken in a whole bunch of ways. This pathetic loser showed “every red flag,” according to the New York Times. The turd posted a YouTube video of himself saying he wished to be a professional school shooter. He had obvious mental health issues. You’ve got government law enforcement agencies that failed; you’ve got government social services agencies that failed. The FBI was informed of his behavior but did nothing because they had been commissioned by Obama and by the Democrat Party machine to invest all of their resources into a witch-hunt against Donald Trump and the 2016 presidential election and the democratic will of the people itself.

But what does the left want? Amazingly, the left wants MORE power and MORE control in the very government that was just proven to be so damn broken!!!

The definition of insanity is giving the same government that continuously fails more power to fail even more while simultaneously stripping people of their God-given right to defend themselves against that very government, let alone all the horrible people that Democrats keep demanding we let out of our prisons to prey upon us again and again.

Feinstein explained that the Watch Lists are populated with “information derived from intelligence and law enforcement sources…” and are maintained by the FBI’s Terrorist Screening Center. She further revealed that largest list, the Terrorist Screening Database, contains over one-million records but less than 5,000 Americans included on that list. Or, as Sen. Feinstein repeatedly said, Americans make up less than one-half of one percent of the Terrorist Screening Database.

And so anyone who is not in favor of massively banning immigrants is to be viewed as personally responsible for the mass shootings because we have lost any meaningful way to detect our monsters due to the massive number of immigrants whom Democrats rabidly protect.

How the hell are the FBI agents – you know, the ones who AREN’T wrapped up in political investigations started by Democrat ideologues and obviously rabid partisan ideologues within the FBI itself – supposed to examine a Nikolas Cruz when they’ve got more than a million potential terrorists invited into our country by the Democrat Party???

These fools who think like this need to be banned something fierce.

Here’s yet another example of Democrats being people who we need to ban: the death penalty which they rabidly oppose and play every single shenanigan there is to undermine it when they can’t ban it. Nikolas Cruz actually is willing to plead guilty to his crime. Why? To avoid the death penalty. Newsflash: the death penalty IS a deterrent, you fools. Especially if it is done swiftly and with certainty where we put these rabid human beings down like the rabid animals they are as soon after the crime as is humanly possible.

Let me return to Mexico – you know, the country with strict voter ID laws – that also allows families to have a process to commit a mentally unstable person against that person’s will. It’s amazing to me how liberals want more and more millions of Mexicans flooding into America but refuse to allow any of the actual good things that the country that sends them here actually follows.

We need to ban people who believe that anyone who is acting or posting crazy shouldn’t be taken off the streets and examined and treated until they are no longer a threat.

My God, I think of a family that is dear to me, who suffered with a young man who was schizophrenic. The young man KNEW he needed help and tried to get it, but there was only one crack to fall through after another. He used drugs like virtually all mentally ill people who are wandering around to try to self-medicate the pain, but he couldn’t get arrested literally to save his life even when police found all the drugs and drug paraphernalia on him. Because, after all, the left employs this “logic”

We are now indoctrinating and addicting an entire generation of young people into the use of mind altering substances, and I am simply going to guarantee you that the problems plaguing our society are going to increase beyond stratospherically.

The Democrat-created drug culture WILL be a nightmare. You watch and enjoy the horror show first on the news, then in your town, then in your home.

But no liberal, no Democrat, is ever going to accept responsibility for the hell they caused.

Which is why we need to ban the damn Democrat Party fast. The Democrat Party is the party of slavery and the party that fought a vicious war to continue the institution of slavery. It has been the party of abject evil ever since. And it needs to be banned something fierce.

If we’re going to start banning, then for God’s sake let’s start banning what truly needs to be banned.

Finally, we have laws against what Nikolas Cruz did. Did you know that? It is ILLEGAL to go to a school and start shooting people! But he did it anyone. Why on earth does anybody believe that criminals and psychopaths won’t still get guns if some dumbass makes it “illegal”?

I’ve been real busy these past few weeks, frankly too busy to write blog articles. Now here it is Christmas and my routine has come to a glorious pause. But it’s fortuitous that my last article was on the status of Jerusalem and the wicked going batpoop over President Donald Trump doing what Bill Clinton and Barack Obama along with George W. Bush and basically the entire Congress including one hypocrite named Diane Feinstein all said they believed should be done.

“Let me be clear. Israel’s security is sacrosanct. It is non-negotiable.

“The Palestinians need a state that is contiguous and cohesive, and that allows them to prosper — but any agreement with the Palestinian people must preserve Israel’s identity as a Jewish state, with secure, recognised and defensible borders.

“Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided. I have no illusions that this will be easy.”

But history since amply proved that whenever Obama said the words, “Let me be clear,” that whatever came out of his mouth afterward would be an outrageous lie.

George Bush also spoke to AIPAC and he said:

“Something will happen when I’m president: as soon as I take office I will begin the process of moving the US ambassador to the city Israel has chosen as its capital.”

What about Bill Clinton? Oh, yeah, he’s a liar and hypocrite too, who said one thing and then did another. Might as well have said, “Let me be clear” the way Obama has done with his red line on Syria and so many other times when he was about to lie to the American people.

Bill Clinton declared in February 1992, at the height of the Democratic primaries, that he supported recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, a step that would alter U.S. policy.

Later, during the general election campaign, Clinton attacked President George H.W. Bush for having “repeatedly challenged Israel’s sovereignty over a united Jerusalem.” He promised that he and running mate Al Gore would “support Jerusalem as the capital of the State of Israel.”
read more: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.769498

And I detailed in my last article:

In 1995 The 104th Congress of the United States passed The Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 overwhelmingly in a bipartisan vote and a veto-proof majority by a by the Senate (93–5) and the House (374–37).

(CNSNews.com) – Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein has written to President Trump, urging him not to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel or to announce he is moving the U.S. Embassy to the city.

Exactly six months ago Tuesday, the senior senator from California voted in favor of a resolution commemorating the 50th anniversary of Israel’s reunification of Jerusalem, and calling on the president to “abide by” the provisions of the 1995 Jerusalem Embassy Act.

That 1995 legislation said Jerusalem should be recognized as Israel’s capital, and required the president to move the embassy from Tel Aviv by May 31, 1999. Feinstein, the eighth-longest serving senator, voted in favor of it on Oct. 24, 1995.

So it’s not like Donald Trump did something unheard of, out of the blue. He merely did what every single U.S. president and virtually ALL Of Congress have declared they were going to do.

But that’s, well, basically obvious and clear U.S. history for the past seventy years, since Harry S. Truman became the first world leader to officially recognize the state of Israel in 1948 when beyond miraculously, Israel defeated six nations that each dwarfed them in size, in population and in resources to fulfill what the Bible declared would happen in Ezekiel chapter 37:1-14 in the prophecy of the dry bones:

37 The hand of the Lord was on me, and he brought me out by the Spirit of the Lord and set me in the middle of a valley; it was full of bones.2 He led me back and forth among them, and I saw a great many bones on the floor of the valley, bones that were very dry.3 He asked me, “Son of man, can these bones live?”

I said, “Sovereign Lord, you alone know.”

4 Then He said to me, “Prophesy to these bones and say to them, ‘Dry bones, hear the word of the Lord!5 This is what the Sovereign Lord says to these bones: I will make breath[a] enter you, and you will come to life.6 I will attach tendons to you and make flesh come upon you and cover you with skin; I will put breath in you, and you will come to life. Then you will know that I am the Lord.’”

7 So I prophesied as I was commanded. And as I was prophesying, there was a noise, a rattling sound, and the bones came together, bone to bone.8 I looked, and tendons and flesh appeared on them and skin covered them, but there was no breath in them.

9 Then He said to me, “Prophesy to the breath; prophesy, son of man, and say to it, ‘This is what the Sovereign Lord says: Come, breath, from the four winds and breathe into these slain, that they may live.’”10 So I prophesied as he commanded me, and breath entered them; they came to life and stood up on their feet—a vast army.

11 Then He said to me: “Son of man, these bones are the people of Israel. They say, ‘Our bones are dried up and our hope is gone; we are cut off.’12 Therefore prophesy and say to them: ‘This is what the Sovereign Lord says: My people, I am going to open your graves and bring you up from them; I will bring you back to the land of Israel.13 Then you, My people, will know that I am the Lord, when I open your graves and bring you up from them.14 I will put my Spirit in you and you will live, and I will settle you in your own land. Then you will know that I the Lord have spoken, and I have done it, declares the Lord.’”

He has remembered His covenant forever, the word which He commanded to a thousand generations, the covenant which He made with Abraham, and His oath to Isaac. Then He confirmed it to Jacob for a statute, to Israel as an everlasting covenant, saying, “To you I will give the land of Canaan As the portion of your inheritance.” – Psalm 105:8-11

The LORD God has remembered His covenant for how long? FOREVER. A thousand generations? Well, keep in mind Jesus was born in Bethlehem only 50 generations ago, so I think we’re still good on the thousand thing. And again, what kind of covenant is it? Oh, it’s an EVERLASTING one.

The article authoritatively asserts, “The key to understanding this rift is the evangelical belief in what is necessary to pave the way for the second coming of Jesus.”

No, you pathetically ignorant dumbass who clearly has no idea whatsoever what the hell you’re writing about.

Interestingly, as I will get to, that above quote in context says, “The divide between evangelicals and other Christian denominations reflects two views of Jerusalem — one traditional and political, the other literal and theological. The key to understanding this rift is the evangelical belief in what is necessary to pave the way for the second coming of Jesus. ” I’ll get to the “traditional and political” versus the “literal and theological.” But let me begin my attack on this stupid notion that evangelical Christians are trying to “pave the way for the second coming of Jesus.”

I don’t like to throw out my bona fides, but I’ve got not one but TWO masters degrees from basically THE most evangelical Christian university on the planet: BIOLA University’s Talbot School of Theology. And I can assure you that evangelicals are in no way, no shape or no form attempting to “pave the way for the second coming of Jesus.” No, that’s a branch of Islam, that is looking for the Twelfth Imam who will only appear if they bathe the world in blood to force his appearing. They believe that “In order to save the world, it must be in a state of chaos and subjugation.” And so they are trying to force the hand of destiny. And that is NOT the project of Evangelical Christians. The Los Angeles Times is doing nothing more than spreading propaganda and bigoted hate against evangelicals in making such preposterous claims.

But I’m not out to “pave the way.” I’m an evangelical; which means I am standing for what is right against what is wrong, and I am standing for what the Word of the Living God declares. And the Word of the Living God declares that yes, Jerusalem IS the capitol of Israel, always was and always will be particularly given the fact that God raised Israel from the dried bones of death after the nation had been dead and in the grave for very nearly 2,000 years (from A.D. 70 to 1948 and in fact 1967 when they miraculously retook Jerusalem). I didn’t cause Israel to become a nation again and neither did evangelicals and neither did the United States or any other country or even Jews; GOD caused Israel to become a nation again beyond all hope.

Therein lies the issue with these supposed “Christians” who so ardently oppose what God declared was His will from the time of Abraham until now and forever for a thousand generations as an everlasting covenant.

And we just witnessed in the United Nations vote the other day the mindset that will be a fulfillment to Psalm 83:4, “Come,” they say, “let us destroy them as a nation, so that Israel’s name is remembered no more.” This is the same wicked United Nations that has wickedly voted to condemn Israel more times than it has condemned all the rest of the nations of the world COMBINED. And everyone who is on the side of the United Nations is in fulfillment of the Word of God on the side of the devil against the LORD God, the God of Israel. And very frankly, if you are one of these people reading these words now, it is YOUR wickedness that is “paving the way” for the second coming of Jesus. Because the Bible makes very clear that it is WICKEDNESS, not righteousness, that will cause Messiah Jesus to save the world that He created from destroying itself. The Bible pits the works of the devil and those who are of their father, the devil (John 8:44), against the work of God: and it is in response to the works of the devil and those who are of their father the devil, rather than evangelicals “paving the way,” who will bring about the coming of the King of kings and Lord of lords.

Don’t you dare blame me LA Times, wicked unrepentant and unregenerate sinners, for “paving the way for the second coming of Jesus.” Because that’s going to be on YOU. As for me, I believe I’ll already be in heaven, having either been raptured or martyred, prior to the return of Jesus as King of kings and Lord of lords. Prior to the events known as the Tribulation (right after the Church age described in Revelation chapters 1-3 in 4:1), the Bible describes a “Come up here!”) moment for Christians. After which a coming political figure (Revelation 6) called the Antichrist or the beast rules over a world that most clearly does NOT want the LORD God of Israel, but rather secular humanism and socialism, to be their god, will worship this political tyrant and eventually take his mark on their right hand or forehead (Revelation 16:2).

The Bible tells us that there will be a great apostasy in the end times, a falling away, prior to the emergence of the man of lawlessness:

“Don’t be fooled by what they say. For that day will not come until there is a great rebellion against God and the man of lawlessness is revealed–the one who brings destruction.” — 2 Thessalonians 2:3

St. Paul – after restating the clear message of the Bible that yes, there WILL be a third temple constructed where the world says over its dead body will there be a Jewish temple, and that the Antichrist will sit in the holy of holies and declare himself “God” when it is built, continues:

“And you know what is holding him back, for he can be revealed only when his time comes. For this lawlessness is already at work secretly, and it will remain secret until the one who is holding it back steps out of the way. Then the man of lawlessness will be revealed, but the Lord Jesus will kill him with the breath of His mouth and destroy him by the splendor of His coming.” — 2 Thessalonians 2:7-8

The ONLY thing holding Antichrist back is the Holy Spirit present in the true, believing Church. But there will be a time when we will all be “caught up together” with Jesus to meet the Lord in the air (1 Thessalonians 4:13-18). It is this word “caught up” – harpazo in the Greek, rapturo in the Latin – that the word “rapture” comes from. In the Rapture, Christ doesn’t come to earth, but rather WE who truly know Him and love Him will come to HIM in the air. And there will be a moment where there are literally no true Christians living or dead on planet earth. Those who have Christ in their hearts, the true Church that is restraining the true evil that will result in the spirit and the coming of Antichrist, will be taken away.

Jesus says to one of His faithful churches, the last church before the apostacizing church of Laodicea where Jesus is literally outside knocking trying to get in with the door shut in His face (Revelation 3:20), these words: “Because you have kept the word of My perseverance, I also will keep you from the hour of testing, that hour which is about to come upont he whole world, to test those who dwell on the earth” (Revelation 3:10).

Which is my cue to leave this earth as I’m caught up to meet the Lord in the air, and the cue of all of those who were faithful to the Word of God and who kept God’s word even when the world hated us because they hated Jesus first (John 15:18-19).

When Jesus says to the last generation of faithful Christians before the coming of the apostasy where most of the church totally falls away, “Because you have kept the word of My perseverance,” He isn’t referring to the “‘political and traditional’ “Christians.” Oh, no, He is most definitely NOT. You who are of the Laodicean age, of pseudo-Christians who are wedded to the ways of the wicked world, will be very, very surprised when true Christians are suddenly GONE and yes, in the plot of the famous Tim LaHaye novel series, you are “Left Behind.” The LA Times article sets up the contrast very, very succinctly: there are those who are about “tradition and politics,” and there will be those who are about faithfully, literally following the Word of God as He revealed it. We didn’t abandon the Word of God when some feminist organization said that abortion was in and the sanctity of life was out; we didn’t abandon the Word of God when some opinion poll came out and said homosexuality was in and God-ordained marriage between one man and one woman was out of vogue. We held to our conscience which was rooted in the Word of God, not godless secular humanism.

Tradition and politics. Neither are very good things. As for politics, that these people who oppose God’s Word and therefore oppose Jerusalem as God’s capitol of God’s people Israel hold so fast to, do you know what it is? It is sticking your finger up to the latest public opinion survey and demagoguing at best the least of two evils. And that’s politics at its BEST, because often they slant the truth and try to convince the people to vote for utopian lies that will never come true. And yes, tradition. Jesus pointed out what He thought of tradition in Mark 7:8: “You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to human traditions.” As the NLT puts the same verse, “For you ignore God’s law and substitute your own tradition.” Yeah, that works. Jesus said, “you cancel the word of God for the sake of your own tradition” (Matthew 15:6). That is EXACTLY what the left has not only done, but gloried in doing. Colossians 2:8 says, “See to it that no one takes you captive through philosophy and empty deception, which are based on human tradition and the spiritual forces of the world rather than on Christ.” Everything the left and the Laodicean “Christian” loves is based on human philosophy and empty tradition in diametric opposition to the Gospel and the Word of God.

And the same is true of Israel and Jerusalem. The Bible couldn’t be more clear who should have Jerusalem, but the world and the Laodicean church don’t give a flying damn what the Word of God declares, other than the fact that they are like the coming Antichrist wicked people who delight in moral godlessness and lawlessness and make up their own gods and their own laws as they impose their will and their way.

How did this pseudo-Christian garbage on Israel and Jerusalem begin? It began in the 5th century AD through a man named Augustine. Augustine read his Bible and it didn’t make any literal sense to him because any literal reading made it clear that Israel and Jerusalem the temple were part of the fundamental plan of God and there hadn’t been an Israel or a temple for over 400 years and it didn’t look like they were coming back. Why, they were like dried up bones in the graveyard!!! And so Augustine rewrote the understanding of the Bible, came up with his own damned theology, that was based not on the Word of God as it was literally revealed in literal, actual words, but rather in allegory and “spiritualization” and metaphor. And so the Bible came to mean exactly what humans wanted it to mean, and it came to stand for exactly what humans wanted it to stand for. The Word of God was no longer allowed to clearly and simply speak for itself; no, it required clever men with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense to explain it to the rest of us.

We see this in the Bible and we see the exact same people using the exact same crap on our Constitution. What does the Constitution mean? Certainly not what it says, but what liberals want it to mean as they impose their will on it and on society, all the while claiming to be the damn champions of the very thing they are most intent on perverting. You take the 2nd Amendment as a very clear example: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Well, say the intellectuals – which is another word for “fool” these days – only a well-regulated militia is able to keep and bear arms, not the people. Or the people are the militia and nothing else. The only problem is that the Constitution very crystal-clearly says “THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.” So on their own damn reading, let’s make sure that only militia people have the right to anything the 1st Amendment guarantees. After all, it focuses on “the right of the people” and we know that only applies to people in militias, right? In the same way, only militia members should be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. Because again, the 4th amendment declares it’s “the right of the people” to have these things. And if morally idiotic liberals had any kind of moral consistency, they would apply this ONLY to people in well-regulated militias. Liberals are indoctrinated into a tradition of lies and are therefore filled with lies and propagate lies in place of the truth.

When you read what the founding fathers themselves said about gun ownership and “the people,” it is compelling to anyone who is NOT a complete fool. “The people” actually means “the people.” Go figure. The problem is, that in these last days, we have a gigantic surplus of complete fools. And the 2nd Amendment properly understood was the founding fathers’ distrust of government and even democracy itself and a reaction against government- and mob-tyranny, such that we should in the United States of America have a government afraid of its people rather than a people afraid of their government. Take Benjamin Franklin’s quotes. He said, “Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!” He said, “They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

I’m sorry, that’s just me reading something literally, you know, the way it is supposed to be read. If I tell you the phone book is a cookbook for cannibals and that we all are supposed to dine on the bodies of liberals after slaughtering them like pigs, all I’m doing is reading the phone book a different way. But the liberal judges have “penumbras and emanations” to guide them and to hell with the obvious, literal meaning. As Thurgood Marshall once encapsulated liberal thinking, “you do what you think is right and let the law catch up.” Because to be a liberal means to stand above the law, above the Constitution, and as we have seen above presidential elections. And impose whatever the damn hell they want and feel pharisaically self-righteous about it the whole damn time they’re doing it. We’re seeing that on our universities as even professors scream down free speech which they once hypocritically professed as sacred and as sacrosanct as a ruse to get their fascist way and then slam the door shut on everyone else.

In the LA Times article, the focus is on the hate of the other side as the primary justification for why Trump was wrong. And the hateful side that embraces violence as solution is right!!!

What does this say about the left when they keep doing this? Not only with the Palestinians on Jerusalem – notwithstanding that they built their damn mosque RIGHT ON TOP of the temple and if Jews treated Arabs the same way Arabs treated Jews there wouldn’t be any Muslims – but think of the violent movement Occupy Wall Street which warped into the violent movement Black Lives Matter and so on with the embrace of the leftist media and the Democratic Party leadership. Think of the liberal universities cancelling free speech because the side they hate wants to be allowed to exercise the right to free speech and their own side is wiling to use violence to prevent it. Liberalism is believing that people should have the right to do what people ought not do. Liberalism is siding with evil against good.

In point of fact, Trump declared that we have given the Palestinians fifty years to fairly negotiate peace, and all they have done is spill as much blood as possible. Even today, they rabidly refuse to even acknowledge in their maps for their school children that there IS such a thing as “Israel.” For Palestinians who teach terrorism to their children and financially reward the families of “martyred” terrorists who “nobly sacrificed their lives” to murder innocent victims with explosives in marketplaces and on public transportation, anyone who has a shred of decency in their hearts, let alone the Holy Spirit, clearly sees which side is on the right and which side has been wrong and in fact demonically evil for decades.

Jesus put it clearly, ye Laodicean “Christians” who are so rich in your liberal traditions and your liberal politics and who don’t honor God or His Word: prepare to be Left Behind when the rapture comes.

In 1995 The 104th Congress of the United States passed The Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 overwhelmingly in a bipartisan vote and a veto-proof majority by a by the Senate (93–5) and the House (374–37). But we had a dissembling liar, coward and yes, we know today by the left’s own standards, a RAPIST in the White House named Bill Clinton. And that dishonest cowardly rapist refused to sign what the Congress had overwhelmingly declared. And so the law was never implemented.

When he was running for president, Donald Trump repeatedly declared that he would recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capitol and relocate the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem.

Israel built the first temple in the 10th century Before Christ, about 950 BC. That temple was destroyed by the Babylonians in 587 BC but rebuilt with all construction completed in 516 BC. That temple stood until the Romans destroyed it in 70 AD. Versus the Muslims, who built their Dome of the Rock or Mosque of Omar ON TOP OF the Jewish Temple, with construction beginning in the late 7th century Anno Domini, in 687 AD. Now, there are people who have the divine ability to comprehend something called “reality” who therefore understand that the Jews were there first and that it IS and always HAS BEEN their land.

In fact King David retook by force what his ancestor Abraham had lawfully purchased back in Genesis 23:1-20 and Genesis 49:31. Abraham proved his faithfulness to God at that same site known today as the Temple Mount and the Temple was built on the place where God had spoken to Abraham.

When the Muslims conquered the land in the 7th century, they built a mosque on the very location the people they conquered held most sacred. By any liberal or secular humanist standard that isn’t a hypocritical double-standard, what the Muslims did was an act of great historic evil.

But sadly, there is literally no such thing as a liberal or secular humanist who is not a hypocrite who bases his or her worldview and understanding of right and wrong on a constantly shifting double-standard with the only consistency being that they are always right no matter how gravely wrong they are.

I’m simply going to put it thus: anyone who sides with the terrorist Palestinians is every bit as bad as any Nazi. Pure and simple. I’m sure Hitler would have been delighted to have such a generous pension program for Holocaust murderers as the Palestinians set up.

There are in fact two realities: the reality of historic fact and the reality of present Islamic and Palestinian terrorist EVIL.

Jerusalem is today and must remain a place where Jews pray at the Western Wall, where Christians walk the stations of the cross, and where Muslims worship at Al Aqsa Mosque. However, through all of these years, presidents representing the United States have declined to officially recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. In fact, we have declined to acknowledge any Israeli capital at all.

But today we finally acknowledge the obvious. That Jerusalem is Israel’s capital. This is nothing more or less than a recognition of reality. It is also the right thing to do. It’s something that has to be done.

But there are people who are owned and operated by Satan, by the prince of the power of the air, people who have “followed the ways of this world and of the ruler of the kingdom of the air, the spirit who is now at work in those who are disobedient” (Ephesians 2:2). And these people are no more capable of receiving or comprehending genuine reality than a cockroach is capable of building a rocket that can land roaches on the moon and assure their safe return to earth.

And these people have played their stupid, pathetic political games year after year, decade after decade.

Yet, for over 20 years, every previous American president has exercised the law’s waiver, refusing to move the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem or to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital city. Presidents issued these waivers under the belief that delaying the recognition of Jerusalem would advance the cause of peace. Some say they lacked courage but they made their best judgments based on facts as they understood them at the time. Nevertheless, the record is in.

After more than two decades of waivers, we are no closer to a lasting peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians.

It would be folly to assume that repeating the exact same formula would now produce a different or better result.

Therefore, I have determined that it is time to officially recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

While previous presidents have made this a major campaign promise, they failed to deliver.

Today, I am delivering. I’ve judged this course of action to be in the best interests of the United States of America and the pursuit of peace between Israel and the Palestinians. This is a long overdue step to advance the peace process. And to work towards a lasting agreement.

Israel is a sovereign nation with the right, like every other sovereign nation, to determine its own capital. Acknowledging this is a fact is a necessary condition for achieving peace. It was 70 years ago that the United States under President Truman recognized the state of Israel.

Ever since then, Israel has made its capital in the city of Jerusalem, the capital the Jewish people established in ancient times.

Today, Jerusalem is the seat of the modern Israeli government. It is the home of the Israeli Parliament, the Knesset, as well as the Israeli Supreme Court. It is the location of the official residence of the prime minister and the president. It is the headquarters of many government ministries.

For decades, visiting American presidents, secretaries of State and military leaders have met their Israeli counterparts in Jerusalem, as I did on my trip to Israel earlier this year.

In other words, it was reality, everyone understood the reality, but lying dissemblers based on the foundations of a rapist have suppressed the truth and have played games. And for decades we have gone nowhere with no peace.

The Word of God delivered to Jeremiah the prophet declared:

They offer superficial treatments for my people’s mortal wound. They give assurances of peace when there is no peace. — Jeremiah 6:14

That is what these fools – and the Bible calls them out for the fools they are – have been doing year after year, decade after decade.

(CNSNews.com) – Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein has written to President Trump, urging him not to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel or to announce he is moving the U.S. Embassy to the city.

Exactly six months ago Tuesday, the senior senator from California voted in favor of a resolution commemorating the 50th anniversary of Israel’s reunification of Jerusalem, and calling on the president to “abide by” the provisions of the 1995 Jerusalem Embassy Act.

That 1995 legislation said Jerusalem should be recognized as Israel’s capital, and required the president to move the embassy from Tel Aviv by May 31, 1999. Feinstein, the eighth-longest serving senator, voted in favor of it on Oct. 24, 1995.