Jun 19, 2007—Earlier this month, investigators from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) found a poisonous chemical in counterfeit Colgate toothpaste being sold by a discount store in Maryland. FDA investigators began spot-checking toothpaste at retailers and distributors on May 31, after tainted toothpaste from China had been discovered in Australia, the Dominican Republic and Panama.

This discovery prompted consumer goods manufacturer Colgate-Palmolive Co. to issue a statement warning that toothpaste falsely packaged as "Colgate" had been found in several discount stores in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Maryland, and that some counterfeit product samples had contained diethylene glycol, a chemical used in antifreeze. Consequently, the distributor of the counterfeit product, MS USA Trading, of North Bergen, N.J., is now recalling all lots of 5-ounce "Colgate" tubes it had previously sold to retailers.

Numerous manufactured products—from luxury items to sporting goods to pharmaceuticals—are counterfeited, trafficked and sold every year. Now, the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), along with other members of the Coalition Against Counterfeiting and Piracy (CACP), has completed a white paper intended to encourage legislation, policies and technology that will help combat the counterfeiting and piracy. NAM is an industrial trade association, representing small and large manufacturers in every industrial sector and in all 50 states; the CACP is a coalition of more than 300 businesses and associations working with Congress and the Bush administration to drive government-wide efforts.

The white paper, announced last week and titled the "Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Initiative," offers a number of recommendations that could be brought to bear in the fight against counterfeiting and piracy. Work on the initiative got underway about three months ago, says Mark-Anthony Signorino, NAM's director of technology policy, at the behest of numerous NAM members.

RFID tags provide unique ID numbers that can be associated to specific manufacturing data, such as the date and time of manufacturing, the product lot numbers and information regarding which companies distributed the goods. When attached to cases and pallets of goods, such tags have the potential to prevent product counterfeiting, because at various points in a supply chain—from the manufacturer to a logistics company and on to customs, then to distributor sites and, ultimately, at retail sites—the tags can be read to ensure goods are authentic. While NAM and the other CACP members did not specifically name RFID in the document, Signorino says RFID tagging is definitely something the manufacturing industry should—and is—considering. "We want to encourage new technologies," he says. "While we don't name RFID specifically—because we don't want to create technology winners and losers—RFID is one of the things we were thinking about."