There is the mediterranid race which can be found in middle east and north africa and often mixed, so it's rather the other way around, those people resemble us because those places were inhabited by whites, did you forget it?

So many "experts" think that Medditerranoids like the Greeks or Italians are mostly derived from "Near Eastern Neolithic farmers" with their swarthy/Semitic appearance and J2, J1, G, K or T Haplogroups and that their IE speech is only a superficial ruling elite imposed influence.

There is the mediterranid race which can be found in middle east and north africa and often mixed, so it's rather the other way around, those people resemble us because those places were inhabited by whites, did you forget it?

This is true. A lot of Turks, Armenians, and Persians look White, as do many Berbers in North Africa (particularly the Kabyle and Riffian Berbers). Even some Levantines could pass for Southern European. Apparently the Neolithic farmers that entered Greece and Italy carried the J2 Haplotype which is supposed to have originated in upper Mesopotamia and are why J2 is so prevalent in Southern Italy, Greece, etc... The Phoenicians are also believed to have aided in J2's diffusion across the Mediterranean like in Southern Spain and elsewhere. The key though is to understand that the racial make-up of the Levant, North Africa, Iran, and Central Asia was different prior to the Arab Conquests, and the Hunnic/Mongol invasions. A lot of mixing and migrations have taken place in the last two thousand plus years.

__________________

"Diversity" and "Multiculturalism" are euphemisms for less White people

This is true. A lot of Turks, Armenians, and Persians look White, as do many Berbers in North Africa (particularly the Kabyle and Riffian Berbers). Even some Levantines could pass for Southern European. Apparently the Neolithic farmers that entered Greece and Italy carried the J2 Haplotype which is supposed to have originated in upper Mesopotamia and are why J2 is so prevalent in Southern Italy, Greece, etc... The Phoenicians are also believed to have aided in J2's diffusion across the Mediterranean like in Southern Spain and elsewhere. The key though is to understand that the racial make-up of the Levant, North Africa, Iran, and Central Asia was different prior to the Arab Conquests, and the Hunnic/Mongol invasions. A lot of mixing and migrations have taken place in the last two thousand plus years.

You forget that the Arabs (and the Jews) share the Neolithic Middle Eastern farmers's genes (J1,J2), appearance and Semitic (AfroAsiatic) languages so it's very hard to tell the difference between Gimbutas' Old Europe (whose descendants are the Spaniards, Italians, Greeks etc) and the Jews or Arabs, based on appearance or genetics.

The Kurgan culture sweeping Europe from Yamna (Ukraine) were the only ethnicity in the ancient world having red hair and fair skin mutations. They originated in Siberia and were the prehistoric mammoth hunters. Dravidians (R2) went to India and mixed with the Australoid indigenous there. Our white ancestors meanwhile founded the corded ware culture in Eastern Europe and bell beaker (Celtic) in Western Europe. The Southern European medditerreneans are mostly Old Europeans with a small venture of Aryan elite.

You forget that the Arabs (and the Jews) share the Neolithic Middle Eastern farmers's genes (J1,J2), appearance and Semitic (AfroAsiatic) languages so it's very hard to tell the difference between Gimbutas' Old Europe (whose descendants are the Spaniards, Italians, Greeks etc) and the Jews or Arabs, based on appearance or genetics.

They separate pretty well on a PCA chart:

("AJA" is the abbreviation here for Ashkenazi Jews.)

Always remember that there are non-Whites who have invaded Greece, and those non-Whites should not be mislabeled as ACTUAL Greeks.

__________________

__________________

Maybe Trump is beginning to figure out that when the media are happy with him, that's a sure sign he has massively screwed up, and when they are spitting fire, he is on course.

Here's a genetic spreadsheet with various racial DNAs, if you look at the Punjabi Jatt, or Sikh Jatt you'll see 3 main components: European at about 14% average, considerably higher or lower depending on the Jatt clan, with breakdowns of west, north and east European. Jatts have 0% southern European DNA, that therefore cancels out a post a member made on the 'differences in Aryan subraces' thread saying Jatts were Mediterranean migrants to North India.

Then you have Caucasian which is around 16-20% depending on which clan, 0% Middle Eastern DNA, (which throws out the annoying theory that Jatts descended from Scythians or Iran). the next largest component is South Asia which is the highest genetic component up to 70%. South Asia means India, and in terms of Jatts it means Northern India, since Jatt clans that stayed in Punjab never mixed with southern dravidians like some Buddhist missionaries that Ashoka sent to the South. It's said that those missionaries were genetically the closest to Punjabi Jatts, most of the Buddhist kings in North India were also said to be Jatt.

As for the Central and East Asian breakdown, the numbers are negligible. .08% central/east Asian in total, with .08 Siberian/Amerindian, 0% east Asian, 0% Mongolian (shoots down that one guy saying we are mongol mixed, that is the Pakistani population who were forced into islam, Sikh Indo-Aryans defeated the descendants of Genghis khan in war), 0% Chinese, 0%southeast, 0% African.

Taking a look at the "Aryan invasion" theory saying that we came to north india, or Aryans came to north india from Europe, if we were Europeans coming into South Asia, shouldn't our European component be higher on average than 14%, shouldn't it be at least 40-60% indicating once original European DNA that was mixed with South Asian DNA. However, its the reverse our South Asian DNA is at a robust 70% on average with European between 20-30% with many clans showing just 14%. This means that our DNA did traveling, broke from the main cluster in North India (South Asia) and reached Europe, while the majority population stayed back in North India. If we were once Europeans coming into India, why isn't that DNA component as robust in our DNA as the South Asian one is.

So colonial Brits can shove that theory up where the sun doesn't shine.

And also Sanskrit which is suppose to be the mother of European languages, travels from North india to Europe, not from Europe to North India. German has Sanskrit and IE language influence, Punjabi, hindi, gurmukhi has Sanskrit influence but no German influence. that is the difference. Aryans were always indigenous to North India, they never migrated in from Europe or Iran. Jatt DNA analysis proves it, your indigenous area is going to be represented most in DNA percentages, if we came from Europe, that component should have been much higher or somewhat comparable at least to our North Indian (South Asia) DNA percentage.

Most of this information is already in line with the Vedas which also mentions our Clans, and the Sikh Gurus who traced our origins back at least 5000 BC in the work called Bacchitar Natak.

The Scythians are NOT from the Middle East. They belonged to a R1a haplogroup and had a strong Nordic appearance. They originally dwelled north of the Black Sea where all our Yamna-derived/Kurgan culture ancestors did. Their direct descendants, the Ossetians look resemble their Slavic brothers in the Russian federation.

The Scythians are NOT from the Middle East. They belonged to a R1a haplogroup and had a strong Nordic appearance. They originally dwelled north of the Black Sea where all our Yamna-derived/Kurgan culture ancestors did. Their direct descendants, the Ossetians look resemble their Slavic brothers in the Russian federation.