Friday, April 21, 2017

With trillions at stake, our united Republican and Democrat slavemasters are poised to kick into high gear to punish American voters and stop Trump's agenda. Attacks on Trump will be bigger than ever. Globalist fat cats behind GOP E believe US tax dollars belong to them. GOP E fully funded all Obama programs 2010-16-sundance (We're supposed to shut up like they do in France)

If you are interested in deep political weeds, keep reading. However, if
you have blood pressure issues or are concerned about your physical or
mental health, STOP HERE and go enjoy life. Believe me.

From a political perspective the outline of the assembled enemy
forces are evident. Next week former President Obama is scheduled to
reappear in Chicago. This is not coincidental. There are trillions of
dollars at stake.

All of the previous accusations, ridicule, marginalization, probes
and diminishment efforts by the media and their multinational corporate
entities will pale in comparison to what lies ahead.

If you listen to Mulvaney carefully, and accept that the UniParty
apparatus is real and purposeful, then you can see the scope of the
financial strategy coming from DC. Remember, the BIG CLUB has paid for
legislative policy. They will not allow those payments to be
non-reciprocated, all of the DC politicians are now commissioned to
fight without limits or rules on their behalf.

♦House Speaker Paul Ryan will use the
budgetary rules process, as a backdoor, to leverage the U.S. CoC [Chamber of Commerce]
Lobbyists construct of the Border Adjustment Tax (BAT).

♦No-one paid by the Big Club in Washington DC will willingly support the Border Wall.

Think about what Director Mulvaney is saying in the video above.
Mulvaney is highlighting the point that tax/budget will either use the
reconciliation process, or not – depending on the opposition and
depending on the support.

Any budget can pass the house with a simple majority, the Republicans have full control.

However, when the budget reaches the Senate if they are going to use
“reconciliation” (simple majority/republicans only) the budget must be
revenue neutral beyond 10 years – ifthe tax plan/budget is going to be permanent.

If the Tax-Plan/Budget delivered to the Senate is not deemed revenue
neutral (scored by CBO) beyond 10 years, it cannot be permanent and use
the reconciliation process (simple majority). Such a plan must contain
a sunset provision or an expiration date.

A permanent tax plan/budget that is: not deficit neutral, and beyond
the 10 year scope, will require support from more than just 52
republican senators to pass; because it will mean long-term deficit
spending.

Here’s where the...UniParty comes into play. This is not a Democrat -vs- White House issue.

President Trump cannot present a balanced budget with drastic cuts to
government, because UniParty republicans will not support it. They,
along with Democrats, will demand more spending.

Most of those same UniParty republicans are already opposed to the
border wall. They view funding for the border wall as a negotiation
tool to keep the federal government spending on other facets. President Trump cannot fund the wall, and simultaneously fund their big
government spending indulgences without deficit spending.

Enter [pathetic] Paul Ryan.

Ryan will propose this Border Adjustment Tax, a program Trump hates,
as the revenue tool to provide the funding for the tax/budget that
contains the border wall funding. See how that works?

Wait, you ask: …what about renegotiated trade deals with
(Mexico) via NAFTA that will, essentially, provide the revenue that more
than pays for the wall?

Great question. Yes, the renegotiated NAFTA deals would easily
provide the treasury revenue that will offset any wall expenditures.

However, now you understand why congress is refusing to accept the
NAFTA “letter of intent” from Commerce Secretary Ross. The republican
UniParty congress is blocking, well, actually they are ‘strategically delaying‘,
Wilbur Ross from renegotiating the trade deal with Mexico – and by
doing so they are blocking the revenue that would undermine their
tax/budget scheme and argument in favor of the B.A.T.

Remember, accepting the letter of intent triggers the start of a
90-day waiting period before Ross can open NAFTA. Congress is waiting to accept, until the end of the 90-day period falls AFTER October 1st 2017, the beginning of Fiscal Year 2018.

This UniParty approach robs the White House from using the
anticipated Mexican money as a point of reference (political talking
point) for the current tax and budget proposals which begin October 1st
for fiscal year 2018. (The B.A.T also impacts the possibility of a
greater economic trade deal with Mexico from the tax side.) See how that works? [Hence, the blood pressure warnings]

This is not a Democrat party working against the White House. This is a republican UniParty working against the White House.

Speaker Ryan is positioning funding for the border wall contingent upon Trump accepting the blanket
B.A.T as revenue to pay for it.

This is the position of the Lobbyists
within the U.S. CoC. If Ryan wins we are all screwed because essentially
the tax revenue will be on our backs for every product imported and
exported. But the big corporations love the enhancements to their
bottom lines.

OMB Director Mick Mulvaney is trying to position and protect
President Trump from having to accept the B.A.T. because the BAT is
antithetical to the economic trade policy, targeted tariff approach, President Trump wants to take.

Simultaneously, Mulvaney is trying to get President Trump the initial
start up money for the Border Wall so he doesn’t have to accept Ryan’s
BAT.

Ergo Mick Mulvaney is trying to draw in Democrat votes to offset the
scheme of Ryan which is relying only upon Republican votes. [John Boehner did this all the time]. If Mulvaney
can get Democrats to vote for funding the border wall by giving them
funding to continue ObamaCare, Mulvaney won’t need Ryan’s BAT revenue
because he’ll have votes to support a deficit bill.

However, Democrats don’t want the border wall either; but they also
don’t want ObamaCare to collapse earlier due to funding shortages within
the insurance reimbursement program (cost share programs)....