Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February
18th 2010. For the newcomers out there and there are always
new ones coming in, you should look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com
web site, scroll down and bookmark all the other sites I have up there.
That way if you ever find sticking on downloading, try these alternate sites
and you should get through much easier. Everyone uses the .com site the
following morning after the talk has been broadcast and apart from that
sometimes I canít upload to the main sites because even though Iím on unlimited
disk space, somehow they donít always get it automatically put up when it has
to. The official sites are [listed above].

The
quick tin can moment is when I rattle that tin can there. You donít hear
anything because there is nothing in it. But itís up to you to keep me
going because Iím probably the only host who does not front, in a sense, for
advertising companies who generally sponsor you. They pay you directly if
you mention who they are or bring them on as guests. Other ones are just
financed by even bookselling clubs and some stuff like that. So itís up
to you to keep me going and you can do so by going into cuttingthroughthematrix.com
and seeing what I have for sale Ė the books, CDs and DVDs Ė or you can donate
to me. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] Those who get
the disks burned and passed to them at meetings Ė who shy away from computers
because theyíve got common sense Ė and they play them on CD players, you can
get in touch with me at [address above].

A
while ago I said it doesnít matter when the big boys make their decisions for
their long-term plans, their far-reaching plansÖ it doesnít matter what
happens, they carry on regardless. I said before too, it wouldnít matter
if you are up to your ears in snow, theyíll still harp on about global
warming. If you notice in the news articles that are sneaking out,
amongst all the incredible scandals that are bursting about the climate change
nonsense, they are still prattling on because they have no other big plan made.
This is all part of population reduction, altering our way of living until we
are ALL third world country status, taking away Medicare, all that kind of
stuff, gradually, across the world, for those who are in the masses, and
sickness and death, disease and famine even will start killing us off.
Itís a FAR-reaching plan because thatís what the socialists dreamed up
when they first set up the Fabian Society. Look into it. Listen to
the speeches by George Bernard Shaw, the co-founder of the Fabian
Society. Remember, thatís just ONE BRANCH of the Royal Institute for
International Affairs. Itís fascinating study when you get into it.
The music is coming in so Iíll be back with more after this break.

Hi
folks. This is Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix and what a
matrix it is, isnít it, as we are given our realities and our perceptions are
distorted and altered and directed for us. The big boys make long-term
plans, long-term goals, 50 years, sometimes 100 year plans. The Fabians
themselves said it might take them 100 years to control the world through their
international affiliations. Well, weíre pretty well there. Youíll
find every government across the planet seems to be Fabian, regardless of the
party symbol they use because the same plans are put into place through
treaties, through the United Nations, exactly as the Fabians and the Royal
Institute of International Affairs/CFR wanted to happen. Thatís why they
set up the United Nations in the first place, not as a debating table but as
the embryo really that would grow into a world governing body.

The
IPCC, this Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that the United Nations
has, has really been exposed. Itís incredible theyíre still there.
They should be disbanded. Itís disgusting the lies theyíve told and have
been exposed for telling, and all the cohorts they had from the professors
across the world who were getting millions of pounds and dollars and grants
thrown at them to ďsave the world.Ē Thatís what you do to priests who terrify
you and say the sun wonít come up tomorrow, youíve got pay them and theyíll
pray and do their voodoo and then voila, up it comes. Itís the same sort
of idea.

This
article is one of the latest scandals and itís from Fox News.

The Next Climate-gate?

Updated February 10, 2010 / By John Lott -
FOXNews.com

(Alan: Itís
interesting how they first preface this. Itís misleading. They GIVE
you how you are going to think about something and they leave you in a
double-think. So this first little paragraph is to leave you in
double-think.)

A new report points
to a sharp reduction of weather stations by the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (A: Thatís NOAA, they call it.) in
cooler locations around the world since 1990. (A: So theyíve been
closing down these weather stations in cooler parts around the world since
1990. Now, listen to what they sayÖ) Could that be why global
temps have seen a steady rise over the last 20 years? (A: In
other words, there hasnít been a steady rise, if you understand what Iím
saying. When you close down all of these different stations, across
Russia alone after the Soviet Union fell apart, or was dismantled, I think
there were over 1,000 of them that were closed down, all across Siberia and everything.
That wasnít taken into consideration for the real temperature of the world, you
see. He goes on to say hereÖ)

The global warming
scandal keeps getting worse. Revelations over the few weeks show that many
important assertions in the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change were
based on misquotes and false claims from environmental groups, not on published
academic research as it was originally presented. This is on top of the recent
mess regarding data, where the three most relied-on data series used by the
United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007 assessment
report still have not been released. Other data simply never seem to have
existed or cannot be provided to other scientists.

But probably the
most damaging report has come from Joseph DíAleo, the first Director of
Meteorology and co-founder of the Weather Channel, and Anthony Watts, a
meteorologist and founder of SurfaceStations.org.

In a January 29
report, they find that starting in 1990, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) began systematically eliminating climate measuring
stations in cooler locations around the world. Yes, that's right. They
began eliminating stations that tended to record cooler temperatures and drove
up the average measured temperature. The eliminated stations had been in higher
latitudes and altitudes, inland areas away from the sea, as well as more rural
locations. The drop in the number of weather stations was dramatic, declining
from more than 6,000 stations (A: See how they fiddle everything.)
to fewer than 1,500.

DíAleo and Watts
show that the jumps in measured global temperature occur just when the
number of weather stations is cut. But there is another bias that this
change to more urban stations also exacerbates. Recorded temperatures in more
urban areas rise over time simply because more densely populated areas produce
more heat. Combining the greater share of weather stations in more urban areas
over time with this urban heat effect also tends to increase the rate that
recorded temperatures tend to rise over time. (A: They were
eliminating them across fields and forests and stuff like that, or hillsides
and putting them in the cemented, concrete jungles of the cities. So of
course they got what they expected to get.)

Their report
provides examples of how the systematic elimination of stations and unexplained
adjustments in temperature data caused measured temperatures to rise for
Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Norway, Sweden, and the United States. Many
adjustments change what would have been a drop in temperatures into an
increase. (A: So they reversed the reality.) Take New
Zealand, where DíAleo and Watts note: ďAbout half the adjustments actually
created a warming trend where none existed; the other half greatly exaggerated
existing warming.Ē

DíAleo and Watts
also criticize how these data adjustments are often unexplained or poorly
documented. In one case involving James Hansen at NASA a Freedom of Information
Act request has been unanswered for over two years.

The report details
other fascinating temperature biases. For example, Siberia has experienced one
the greatest increases in recorded warming. A large drop in the number of
stations and the some missing data can explain part of the change, but apparently
during the Soviet-era areas with lower recorded temperatures received more fuel
and money, creating a real incentive for weather stations to lie.

The DíAleo and
Wattsí report also helps answer some puzzling questions about the report. One
of the major ones questions has been the divergence in temperature data
recorded by satellites in space and down here on the ground. That difference
was very small when satellites first started being used during the 1980s but
has grown over time, with ground observations showing a rise in temperature
relative to the satellite data. The urban warming effect may not only explain
this, but also why land warming has been so much greater than ocean warming.

All three
terrestrial global-temperature datasets (National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration/ National Climatic Data Center, NASA Goddard Institute for Space
Studies, and University of East Anglia) really rely on the same measures of
surface temperatures. These three sources do not provide independent measures
of how the worldís temperatures have changed over time. The relatively small
differences that do arise from these three institutions result from how they
adjust the raw data. (A: And by God, do they do some
adjusting, and fiddling, and exaggerating as well.)

Flawed data leads
to flawed conclusions.

But,
itís in line with the agenda and it really wonít matter much because all the
socialists are truly on board, across the world, and theyíve got their
governments to sign on and be goody-two-shoes to outdo each other to show
theyíre all on board to save the world and all the rest of it. Apart from
that, about 5-6 years ago they were already trading carbon. Itís a
done deal with the multi trillionaires that run the world and so theyíve
already got this carbon thing. I call it the Ďsin taxesí because itís
like collecting sacks of sins. You open it up and there is nothing in it,
but thatís how it is. Itís absolute nonsense. It will take
something like oil or the manufacturing of something and we can convert that
into carbon that was used to create it and they make this GUESSTIMATION, big
guesstimations, then they come up with, really, what the carbon output would be
if you burned it, which you are not going to do. Itís an absolute BOGUS
SCAM but itís this scam that all the big boys have planned to rule our lives
with. Really. They donít even need the sacks to gather the sins,
you know, the CO2. They just have to claim itís there and work it out on
paper, or build a special computer that you feed in fake data, just like they
do at the IPCC, and youíll get what you want. Itís great. There is
no outlay. Thereís no outlay, you donít have to buy the sacks to contain
the CO2 that you canít see. When you fold them up anyway thereís nothing
in it right. But thatís the cons that go on in the world and this is to
rule our lives.

There
are articles coming out now on climate change and how they are going to have to
put it through and some governments are already doing it, with the far, far,
left - left of Marx in fact - politicians that are on board. Iíll put a
link up on my web sites to show you the one thatís been introduced for Ireland
to sign. Itís a voluntary thing but itís totalitarian. It
was done on the 28th of October 2009.

Oireachtas Joint Committee on Climate Change and
Energy Security

Climate Change law necessary for Ireland to
demonstrate its commitment to become low carbon economy

Oireachtas.com / 28 October 2009

That
will give you an idea of whatís to come here including the setting up of law
forces to enforce it on the ordinary people who are not IN the carbon trading
business. In other words, punishment crews. Theyíre going to rake
in lots of money off you if thereís a little draft coming through your window,
believe you me. This is a whole new area of infringement of your rights
and lack of privacy and all the rest of it. And theyíre going to give
themselves, of course, more rights to come into your home because theyíve been
teaching us for years now thatís itís not yours anyway. You have no
privacy and you donít DESERVE privacy. Privacy is a sort of privilege, if
you obey all the laws, pay all the fees and licenses and all the rest of it,
and let every agency come into your home when you demand it. This is the
Fabian way and I kid you not. I kid you not, thatís what it is.

Politicians
are just low-level psychopaths that are picked by the big boys to front for
them. They get funded IN to government. I watched one on Cameron
recently, for Britain, who was pretending he was a conservative, going around
getting fund raising from EVERYBODY you can imagine, even from Israel, the
Israel lobby. Heís promising them everything if they just back him
financially. Every group thatís out there, heís saying, Iím your man; Iím YOUR man. The
left are even worse. The program I watched Ė it was a disk that was sent
to me Ė showed you the different politicians and the Labour bunch going around
doing the same thing. Theyíre just low-level con men that will say
whatever they are told to say to get IN to power and have a good time.
Thatís how they are, low-level psychopaths; but they donít run the world, the
ones above them do. Back with more after this break.

Hi
folks. This is Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix. As I
say, these politicians that are SELECTED are just yes-men to whoever backs them
and theyíve got terrible records in their personal lives when you look into
them, of how many of them are on charges for one thing or another, lots of
drunk driving charges, personal bankruptcies, credit cards run to the limit and
over, all that kind of stuff. These are the guys who generally get
into politics. The psychopaths smell which way the wind is blowing
basically, and they suddenly become an advocate of whatever is popular.
They are so immature; I think itís because of all the booze they take all the
time, at least the British Parliament. Here is an article to do with what
they are all about.

Ministers (A: Thatís
politicians. They call them ministers over there.)lavished
£9m (A: Of the taxpayer money, right.) on climate change stunts... but public opinion is left
cold by global warming 'propaganda'

The projects paid
for by the Governmentís Climate Challenge Fund did next to nothing to change
public opinion, a Whitehall report found.

It said the
initiatives were almost entirely preaching to the converted and that trying to
drum up interest through sensationalism only put people off.

Schemes included a
£40,000 DVD (A: Thatís quite a lot. You can make a hit record
with that.) in which schoolchildren explained that in ten years everyone
will have to wear sunglasses all the time, because the sun will be shining
more. (A: These are the kind of stupid things they do.)

A tent set up in
shopping centres and labelled an Ďexperiential climate domeí was subsidised by
Whitehall (A: Thatís the taxpayersí money again.) to the tune of
nearly £400,000; a computer game cost £47 every time it was played; and a
series of Ď challenging pub quizzesí about climate change cost more than
£85,000.

Large grants went to
councils, schools and youth groups for (A: Listen to thisÖ) Ďattitude
modificationí programmes and to assure the public that man-made
global warming is an established scientific fact. (A: So,
once you brainwash the children, they donít have much of a chance to be honest
with you because itís a real indoctrination they get and lies. Quite
interesting, Ďattitude modificationí programs, did you think thatís what your
schools were about? Pavlov is alive and well!)

And £200,000 went to
Oxford University to Ďtake climate change into the communityí. (A:
To get it into the community, with little posters and little handouts and
stuff. £200,000, thatís not bad work if you can get it, eh?)

Details of the
projects and the report for Ed Milibandís Department of Energy and Climate
Change Ė which was never published Ė were unearthed by the TaxPayersí Alliance
through Freedom of Information requests.

Matthew Sinclair,
the groupís research director, said: ĎThe Government has clearly crossed the
line from public information to propaganda on climate change.

ĎMany of the Climate
Challenge Fund projects are utterly bonkers(A: That means
crazy.)and misleading, and come with a huge price tag.

ĎDespite a fortune
having been spent on these projects, the fund has failed even on its own
spuripeopleous terms. It is infuriating for taxpayers to see their money
squandered on attempts to scare and indoctrinate the public.í

The report by
consultants Brook Lyndhurst said the projects largely failed to produce any
changes in the opinions among their target audiences. It judged that Ďthe
aggregate picture is one of neutral or very modest positive shiftsí.

Future programmes
should Ďavoid sensationalist or shocking imagery in climate change messages,
since respondents are likely to find this off-puttingí, it said.

The report added
that those attracted to the projects were Ďalready interested in climate
changeí. (A: Meaning theyíre already brainwashed.) It
suggested that in many cases organisations viewed the funding as Ďa way to
secure additional resourcesí (A: Of course they do.), and said the
running the projects often did not have Ďnecessary skillsí. (A:
Of course they wonít. What do you need to lie? What skills does it
take?)

The money was paid
to public organisations and voluntary groups between 2006 and 2008.

Details emerged
after several other high-profile climate change failures in recent months.

The Climatic
Research Unit at the University of East Anglia (A: Which were getting
millions of pounds in grants.), which received £16,000 from the Climate
Challenge Fund (A: Öas well, on top of that.), has come under fire
over leaked emails which show scientists attempted to hide data from
sceptics. (A: Professor Jones himself already admitted, and I
read it yesterday from the paper, that the earth has actually been
COOLING. And he goes for 15 years; he wonít go for 20 yet, but heís
getting better than he was.)

And the UNís
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been found to have made exaggerated
and ill-informed claims, for example over the rate at which Himalayan
glaciers are melting. Its chief, Rajendra Pachauri, has faced calls to
resign. (A: But heís too busy writing his pornographic
novels. Thatís a fact; thatís what he does to pass the time.
Delusions of grandeur, isnít it? Power goes to their little heads.)

Thereís
a caller from Alaska and itís John. Are you there John?

John: How are you today?

Alan: Iím hanging on here.

John: Iíve heard you mention on a previous show on
how they are creating this world culture thatís world government indoctrination
and they are pushing it through schools.

Alan: Hold on and weíll come back on that topic
after this break.

Hi
folks. This is Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix, talking to
John from Alaska about the school system. Carry on, John.

John: My journey to awakening to how theyíve been
trying to create this world culture, Iíve come across UNESCO, its Purpose
and its Philosophy written by Julian Huxley. Iím sure you are
probably familiar with that.

Alan: Iíve read some of his stuff on the air, in
fact, from his books.

John: Okay. Of course, you can get this for
free online, if any of your listeners would like to look through this.
Would you mind if I read a few of the quotes?

Alan: Sure, go ahead.

John: Okay. On page 57 it says here,

Not much remains to
be said in conclusion, but what remains is important. It is that the task
before UNESCO is necessary, is opportune, and, in spite of all multiplicity of
detail, is single. That task is to help the emergence of a single
world culture, with its own philosophy and background of ideas, and with its
own broad purpose.

On
page 13 he says,

The moral for UNESCO
is clear. The task laid upon it of promoting peace and security can never be
wholly realised through the means assigned to it-education, science and
culture. It must envisage some form of world political unity, whether
through a single world government or otherwise; & the only certain means
for avoiding war.

Let
me see, in closing here he has in interesting reference - this is on page 21 -
to eugenics and how they were going to push eugenics through UNESCO. It
says,

Thus even though it
is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years
politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to
see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the
public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is
unthinkable may at least become thinkable.

Alan: Thatís right. What he was talking
about there was terminating children, sterilizing the ones that they would
claim were inferior. Remember too, UNESCO is the United Nations, again,
Educational and Scientific organization. He was the first CEO for
it. He was also the top character who helped run the Margaret Sanger
abortion clinics across the world. He was all for reducing the inferior
quality type of peoples. Carry on.

John: Yes. UNESCO was also investigated in
California for being charged with pushing internationalism. A lot of
people arenít aware of that. Thereís the United Nations right there
pushing internationalism and world government and a world culture. From
what Iíve seen Alan, it seems like they are pushing this hip-hop style culture
on the entire planet. Iím up here in Alaska and when I got here I was
astonished to see the Native Americans here with the sagging pants and the wild
music and things like that. I figured I was getting away from that.
But it seems like they are pushing that on the entire planet and they are using
that to dumb down the language. They are using that to also break down
the family.

Alan: There is no doubt about it. The
content of the wording, when you can make out what the words are, what they are
actually saying, or mumbling I should sayÖ thatís intentional too. The
parents, they close their heads off, they donít listen, they canít hear
it. Itís intentional for the children to understand it and itís to bypass
the parents. If the parents knew some of the stuff they are actually
chanting away there, itís pretty grotesque stuff, you know.

John: Exactly. I just want to thank you for
making me aware of how they push these things, the entertainment and things
like that. You know, the entertainment is, like you say, itís over a lot
of peopleís heads. Itís kind of under the radar and a lot of people donít
realize that they are BEING programmed, under
the threshold of consciousness through the entertainment.

Alan: Absolutely.

John: Itís just amazing when you look into the
little messages that they implant in this entertainment.† Iíve put together a little forum. The
address is thcforum.ning.com. Weíve just been trying to analyze this
disgusting culture they are hitting us with. This entertainment, this
music, itís very sinister what they are pushing.

Alan: The thing is too, they really did come out
in the culture industry and those at the top who control the culture industry Ė
and it is controlled and itís directed Ė as to where they were going to take
it. Linguistic minimalism
was one of their goals. This is from the big scientists at the top, they
said, if we can reduce the vocabulary
then eventually they will be unable to even exchange opinions or ideas and they
would be obedient. Because if they were angry - you couldnít get
people stirred up to rebel or whatever - because you literally couldnít
express your feelings to them. Thatís part of it. The other
part was also to create a common culture, a youth culture that would be so
separate, so different from their parents that they would be in complete
control of those who led them through the culture industry and the educational
authorities. This is not just happenstance.

Back
in the 60s you had a variety of music to choose from. Varieties.
You had all kinds of folk, traditional, old stuff, new stuff, you had classical
playing too. You had jazz. You had the early pop music and so
on. Gradually they eliminated everything until there is just THIS way and
thatís Much-Musicís TV and thatís ALL you get now across the whole
planet. Itís even in Africa; youíll see the guys in Africa Ė they donít
even have shoes Ė but theyíve got the hat on backwards and theyíll try to even
make their own baggy pants. Because everyone
wants to be the same, as what they see as these stars. Iíve talked
to a lot of the guys in the rap industry and some of them actually admitted to
me that they go into the studio with a plain little kind of song and in would
come the big boys and start changing this, changing that, until they are
killing copsÖ Itís all about - I canít even say - having relations with
women any more; itís beyond that. Itís what DOGS do in heat. They
just use the words for it now and the parents canít even hear this stuff.
They donít understand what the words are. It literally is debasing, debasing humans, both male and female, down to
a lower status than animals. Animal breed when they have to.
This is literally, itís like teaching them to have a rutting season
perpetually.

John: I donít know if you heard, but one of the
forerunners in the hip-hop community, his name is KRS-One and heís actually
what you could call a sort of a darling in the alternative news circuit.
Heís actually created whatís called ĎThe gospel of hip-hop.í He said that
hip-hop is actually divine. What he is doing, heís released this sort of
Bible and heís actually turning hip-hop into a religion.

Alan: Well, he wonít be just the one thatís doing
it. There will be bigger boys than him. All these guys at the bottom
are puppets you know. They do as they are told, guided, directed.
But the whole idea of just have sex at all time with anybody, blah, blah, blah,
was to stop bonding because they
donít want people breeding and having families. That was what Julian
Huxley at UNESCO himself said. He said that in that book you are reading,
in fact. He said, weíll find so
many ways of contraceptives. Weíll alter the family way of life until
there is no family at all. He says,
the people could be living in very poor conditions, world wide, but at least
they can have sex all day and all night long with no consequences, no offspring.
That was the main thrust of it, but no bonding.

John: There isnítÖ and you can chalk a lot of it
up to also our dependence on the nanny state. Iím a black man and itís
sad what theyíve done to the black community and what weíve allowed to be done
to ourselves through this dependence on the nanny state. What they do is
they offer them these child support, welfare benefits, and such. But what
they do is they encourage the man not to be in the house. And with the
child support, the government garnishes his checks. They take half of the
money out of what the woman gets in the form of child support for themselves.

Alan: Thatís right. See, they use those
communities. First you make them dependent on the social service
division. They have total control over you then. They love
this. Itís a test group, you understand. Itís a test group and what
works with one group will work with any group. They did a lot of
experimentation in those communities once they have them dependent.
Youíre quite right.

John: So, the man is like well, is she trying to sleep with me so she can get child support
money? Then the woman is like, well,
is he just trying to sleep with me because heís trying to be some rapper or
something like that. You have these two people who are suspicious
of each other and the family is going to break down before it even starts.

Alan: Youíre right. That was the full
intention of it. Theyíve been awfully successful across the board.
Very few people know how to bond anymore. And the next generation growing
up, that are maybe 12 right now, are going to be worse because theyíve had far
more scientific indoctrination. They think nothing of oral sex, when you
look at all the studies in the newspapers and from the schools
themselves. The teachers are even saying they come back on a Monday and
they were used to how they used to chat about what theyíd done. The children
are all literally chatting, 12 year olds, of the partners that they had
sexually. Thatís standard now. However, theyíll never bond with
anybody for their lives and THATíS exactly why they introduced this kind of
system.

John: Exactly. And people ask where the
cervical cancer is coming from. When you actually look into it, where the
cervical cancer is coming from, a lot of it is actually caused by chemicals in
the condoms.

Alan: And also various anti-spermicides they are
using as well.

John: Exactly. Thatís what really blows your
mind when you look into this because a lot of it just goes back to
problem-reaction-solution and things like that, that the medical industry, the
FDA, is profiting off of. The culture creationists themselves, they are
profiting from this breakdown of the family.

Alan: You understand that this is literally is a
SCIENTIFIC and itís a MILITARY strategy plan to destroy all that was to bring in the new. Thatís what they
said themselves. The main target was to stop all bonding. Stop
all bonding; create incredible promiscuity until no one is happy with anyone
else except for one-night stands. Then there would be no offspring and
plus it destroys the culture that held people together. There is strength
in numbers. There is strength in the family. Even one person, just
one person, your wife with you, gives you that extra strength in you with
her. When you have nobody to stand up for you, the government then is in
charge of you with all of its fear tactics.

John: Yep. Alan, I appreciate it.
Thank you.

Alan: Thanks for calling.

Hereís
a quote from Zbigniew Brzezinski and itís from his book, Out of Control,
Global Turmoil on the Eve of the 21st Century. He says, Television gives the young viewer a first
glimpse of the outside world. It first defines and does so compellingly
by combining the visual and audio impact, the meaning of the good life. In
other words, it gives you FANTASY to follow. Thatís all they see is these
guys that have got diamonds and gold bracelets dangling off them. Thatís
wealth, eh? It sets the standard of
what is to be considered achievement, fulfillment, good taste and proper
conduct. Now, proper conduct can be debauchery nowadays; theyíve
reversed it. It conditions desiresÖ
If you get nothing but girls dancing on TV that look like strippers, thatís
what itís intention is, if you are so dumb you donít know that. Thatís to
stimulate desire and make you rather
disgruntled with the person you are living with, your wife. It defines aspirations and expectations and
draws the line between acceptable and unacceptable behavior. With
audiences around the world increasingly glued to television sets, there
is nothing comparable either in the era of enforced religious orthodoxy or even
at the high point of totalitarian indoctrination to the cultural and
philosophical conditioning that television exercises on its viewers. Now,
heís a guy who should know. That was part of his job, was how to control
the minds of millions of people and create this planned future that we are now
in today.

It
isnít just that. Youíve got to understand, they go further in some
countries than others. Britain is the spearhead for the rest of the world
to follow. People are FLEEING Britain now. I read the report
recently about a Scottish couple that had to FLEE to Ireland because the Child
Services wanted to take her child from her. This is all part of the
depopulation program, by the way. That was to raise up the so-called
SERVICES into AUTHORITIES over the family and split up families until
people wouldnít want a family. They would be scared to have one.
This article is from the Mail Online with another case.

Pregnant Briton who fled to Spain to prevent social
services taking child, gives birth to son (A: while in
Spain.)

By Andrew Levy / 18th February 2010 / Mail Online

A pregnant British
woman who fled abroad to avoid her child being taken into care by social
services was recovering last night after giving birth to a son.

The woman and her fiance
secretly moved to Spain in December after their first child, a daughter, was
taken away by social workers and put up for adoption. (A: There
are your choices in a totalitarian state. Family
is bad, family is bad, family is badÖ thatís the message.)

Their case has been
taken up by Tory MP Tim Yeo who accused Suffolk County Council of 'child
kidnap' because the couple were declared unfit parents despite no evidence they
would cause the girl physical or emotional abuse. (A: What do
they mean by FIT? This is EUGENICS, folks. This is the terminology
they use with eugenics.)

The mother
originally came to the attention of social workers after her former husband
successfully fought for custody of a son they had together. Mr Yeo said
'spurious' concerns had been concocted about her parenting skills. (A:
ĎSpurious,í thatís what they make up during lawsuits in court. Their
lawyers tell them to lie.)

Speaking exclusively
to the Daily Mail yesterday the couple - who cannot be identified for legal reasons
but are referred to as Carissa and Jim - said their happiness at the birth in a
hospital on the Costa Brava was tinged with sadness by being separated from
their daughter.

Lorry driver (A:
Truck driver.) Jim, 41, said: 'We are over the moon about our son but it's
impossible to forget how these people have ruined our lives.

'Throughout this
process we have been thinking about how our daughter should have been with us
to share our joy. (A: Before the authorities kidnapped the
daughter.) Instead, we lost her and then had to escape here with
hardly any money in our pockets.'

Mr Yeo used
Parliamentary privilege in November to raise the issue at the House of Commons
and accuse the council of 'actively seeking opportunities to remove babies
from their mothers'. (A: Back with more after this break.)

HI
folks. This is Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix. Just
to end that article, it mentions thatÖ

Carissa's first
child, he said, was taken away after her ex-husband's girlfriend, who works for
Essex Social Services, contacted a friend in Suffolk Social Services. (A:
So you understand, they set it up through this little mafia, the social
services organizations. Thatís how they do each other favors. Quite
amazing.)

Alan: Thereís another caller on the line.
Thatís Dave from Arizona. Are you there Dave?

Dave: Just to continue and go along that line of
predictive programming. There is something Iíve noticed. In the
last, say the last 8 years, the horror genre is one of my favorite genres
growing up. Itís just like the movies now and Iím talking about movies
like Hustle and Saw are just garbage. They are just
junk. You can tell that basically itís just to remove humanity.
Itís very impersonal. Itís not like a shark or itís not like something
from outer space. Itís like movies that highlight people who are sadistic
and they like to torture and they like to murder.

Alan: Youíre right. You see, the ones at the
top who run the world, the psychopaths,
they are deviant and they are sado-masochists and all power structures
you find, really, are formed after the sado-masochistic tendencies. You
find this with those who worshipped Lenin and still do. Those who
worshipped Stalin, a guy who killed everyone close to him, people literally
worshipped him. The people who worshipped Adolf Hitler, his close
officers around about him, even at the trails and so on, had absolute
glorification for him. Here is the thing with sado-masochists, they
worship the one with more power above them but they hate and despise the weaker
one beneath them, of a lower rank. The culture industry today is FULL,
absolutely full of sado-masochism. Absolutely, youíre right.

Dave: Two more examples and I didnít see this
movie but Iíve seen this highlight. I mean, you couldnít pay me to see
this movie. There is a movie called Inglorious Bastards.
They actually show some buy beating some guyís brains out. Youíve got to
ask yourself Alan, why exactly, why do we need to see that?

Alan: You know why you are seeing that?
Because itís a process of desensitization
and the devaluation of human life and so are all those CSI programs on
TV. Hereís another Ďstiffí in and they start ripping the body apart like
it was just a pound of meat, itís not a person. You are being
DESENSITIZED constantly, constantly, constantlyÖ right down to our
relationships between male and female. Thatís been the biggest war of
all. They canít bond anymore. All the male is and all the
female is, are sexual objects and they will discuss how good it was in the sack
that night. Thatís all itís about today, not bonding at all. If
bonding comes along, there is a power there with the two of them and then you
have offspring. They DO NOT WANT OFFSPRING but they DO want us
desensitized. That way too, when the big trouble starts and the riots
start and you go through periods of chaos, when you see the brains at the side
of the road that the cops just bashed out of somebody, it wonít effect you
quite as much and youíll go along like a robot and pass them by.

Dave: Right because it looks like the Western
society is now a male-hating society.

Alan: It is absolutely a male-hating
society. The main target was against the male. Theyíve been very
successful about it. Guys today donít know what they really, truly are
anymore. They canít be a man anymore; they canít stand up even for their
wives sometimes.

Dave: Thanks a lot Alan.

Alan: Thanks for calling.

Sad
but true; but this war has been long and vicious, subtle and scientifically
organized and pushed from the top down,
as always. Weíve got to fight backÖ itís worth it.

From
Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your
Gods GO with you.