The Fisher House Foundation will pay death benefits to families of fallen troops and get reimbursed by the Pentagon once the shutdown is over. By Stephanie Gaskell

This story has been updated.

The Fisher House Foundation, an organization long- known for caring for wounded troops and their families, will pay death gratuity benefits for the families of servicemembers killed during the government shutdown – and the Pentagon will back them pay once it’s over.

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel announced the deal on Wednesday after massive public outrage that benefits – including a $100,000 payment to the family within 36 hours of the death notice – would not be paid while the government is shut down.

“Today I am pleased to announce that the Department of Defense is entering into an agreement with the Fisher House Foundation that will allow the federal government to provide the family members of fallen service members with the full set of benefits they have been promised, including a $100,000 death gratuity payment,” Hagel said in a statement released shortly after he, Army Secretary John McHugh and Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno traveled to Dover Air Force Base in Delaware for the dignified transfer ceremony for four soldiers who were killed by an IED in Afghanistan on Sunday. “After the shutdown ends, DoD will reimburse the Fisher House for the costs it has incurred.”

Subscribe

Receive daily email updates:

Subscribe to the Defense One daily.

Be the first to receive updates.

“I am offended, outraged and embarrassed that the government shutdown had prevented the Department of Defense from fulfilling this most sacred responsibility in a timely manner,” he said.

So is Ken Fisher, a New York City real estate developer who runs the Fisher House Foundation.

Fisher said he saw news reports that the benefits would not get paid during the shutdown and “I started just getting angrier and angrier.” The lapse in benefits became more urgent with five U.S. troops were killed in Afghanistan over the weekend

“We’re still working on how to implement this,” Fisher told Defense One. He said he’s in touch with Pentagon officials to figure out how to administer the checks. The foundation could give money directly to the families, but there’s an issue of privacy, or give the money to the Defense Department, but there’s uncertainty over whether DoD can process the checks during the shutdown. “At the end of the day if I have to drive it down myself and give it to them, I will,” Fisher said. “This segment of society, when they raise their hand, they give an oath and the oath is to defend this nation, with my life if necessary. But this country also takes an oath, that if you’re wounded, we’ll take care of you, if you don’t make it home, we’ll take care of your family.”

On Tuesday night, Fisher vowed to help the families of the fallen. But he said it was Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., who sits on the Armed Services Committee, who urged Fisher to coordinate with the Pentagon. “I can absorb it, but I can’t absorb it indefinitely. I’ll do what I can for as long as I can,” he said.

In his statement announcing the deal, Hagel said he warned Congress about the lapse in death benefits. “In the days after the shutdown, departmental lawyers and budget officials pursued every tool and option at our disposal in an effort to provide these benefits. Even under the Pay Our Military Act, we found that we lacked the necessary authority to make payments to the families directly,” he said. Pentagon Comptroller Bob Hale also mentioned the lapse during a press briefing at the Pentagon before the government shut down. But it wasn’t until troops were killed in Afghanistan that Congress and the White House acted to fix the problem.

The Fisher House Foundation was founded in 1990. It has built 63 Fisher Houses – living facilities near military hospitals that families of wounded troops can stay during recovery – and is planning to open another in Nashville, Tenn., next month.

Stephanie Gaskell is managing editor of Defense One. She previously covered the Pentagon for Politico. Gaskell has covered war, politics and breaking news for nearly 20 years, including at the Associated Press, the New York Post and the New York Daily News. She has reported from Iraq, Afghanistan, ...
Full bio

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or
otherwise objectionable. Although Defenseone.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and
has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems
to be in violation of this rule.

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

Federal organizations rely on state-of-the-art IT tools and systems to deliver services efficiently and
effectively, and it takes a vast ecosystem of organizations, individuals, information, and resources to successfully deliver these products. This issue brief discusses the current threats to the vulnerable supply chain - and how agencies can prevent these threats to produce a more secure IT supply chain process.

Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.