☒
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For
the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2019

☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For
the transition period from ____________ to _____________

Commission
File No. 000-51229

MANUFACTURED
HOUSING PROPERTIES INC.

(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada

51-0482104

(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

136
Main Street, Pineville, North Carolina

28134

(Address of principal
executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(980)
273-1702

(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)

Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock

Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No
☒

Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐
No ☒

Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference
in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐

Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting
company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,”
“smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large
Accelerated Filer ☐

Accelerated Filer ☐

Non-Accelerated
Filer ☒

Smaller reporting company ☒

Emerging growth company ☐

If
an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for
complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate
by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As
of June 28, 2019 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), the aggregate
market value of the shares of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates (based upon the closing price of such
shares as reported on OTC Pink Market) was approximately $2,154,568. Shares of the registrant’s common stock held
by each executive officer and director and by each person who owns 10% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded
from the calculation in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates of the registrant. This determination of affiliate status
is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

As
of April 10, 2020, there were a total of 12,341,980 shares of common stock of the registrant issued and outstanding.

Except
as otherwise indicated by the context and for the purposes of this report only, references in this report to “we,”
“our” and “our company” refer to Manufactured Housing Properties Inc., a Nevada corporation, and its consolidated
subsidiaries.

Special
Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements

This
report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, that include information
relating to future events, future financial performance, strategies, expectations, competitive environment, regulation and availability
of resources. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation: statements concerning projections, predictions, expectations,
estimates or forecasts for our business, financial and operating results and future economic performance; statements of management’s
goals and objectives; trends affecting our financial condition, results of operations or future prospects; statements regarding
our financing plans or growth strategies; statements concerning litigation or other matters; and other similar expressions concerning
matters that are not historical facts. Words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,”
“would,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “expects,” “anticipates,”
“future,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes” and “estimates,” and similar
expressions, as well as statements in future tense, identify forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking
statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results and will not necessarily be accurate indications
of the times, or by which, that performance or those results will be achieved. Forward-looking statements are based on information
available at the time they are made and/or management’s good faith beliefs as of that time with respect to future events
and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed
in or suggested by the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause these differences include, but are not limited
to:

our
ability to maintain internal controls and processes to ensure all transactions are accounted
for properly, all relevant disclosures and filings are timely made in accordance with
all rules and regulations, and any potential fraud or embezzlement is thwarted or detected;

●

the
ability of manufactured home buyers to obtain financing;

●

the
level of repossessions by manufactured home lenders;

●

market
conditions affecting our investment securities;

●

changes
in federal or state tax rules or regulations that could have adverse tax consequences;
and

●

those
risks and uncertainties referenced under Item 1A. “Risk Factors” included
in this annual report.

Potential
investors should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Except as expressly required by the federal securities
laws, there is no undertaking to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events, changed circumstances or any other reason. If we do update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference
should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking statements. Potential investors
should not make an investment decision based solely on our company’s projections, estimates or expectations.

The
specific discussions herein about our company include financial projections and future estimates and expectations about our company’s
business. The projections, estimates and expectations are presented in this report only as a guide about future possibilities
and do not represent actual amounts or assured events. All the projections and estimates are based exclusively on our management’s
own assessment of our business, the industry in which we operate and the economy at large and other operational factors, including
capital resources and liquidity, financial condition, fulfillment of contracts and opportunities. The actual results may differ
significantly from the projections.

1

PART
I

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS.

Overview

We
are a self-administered, self-managed, vertically integrated owner and operator of manufactured housing communities. We earn income
from leasing manufactured home sites to tenants who own their own manufactured home and the rental of company-owned manufactured
homes to residents of the communities.

We
own and operate 20 manufactured housing communities containing approximately 1,308 developed sites and a total of 417 company-owned
manufactured homes. The communities are located in Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee. See Item 2. “Properties”
for s description of these manufactured housing communities.

Our
Corporate History and Structure

We
originally incorporated in the State of Nevada as Frontier Staffing, Inc. on September 3, 2003. Since our incorporation, we have
experienced several name changes and have engaged in several different business endeavors. On October 12, 2017, Mobile Home Rental
Holdings LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company, which engaged in acquiring and operating manufactured housing properties,
merged with and into our company. In connection with the merger, the name of our company was changed to Manufactured Housing Properties
Inc., the former business and management of Mobile Home Rental Holdings became the business and management, respectively, of our
company at that time.

In
connection with our acquisitions of manufactured housing communities, we have established various limited liability companies
to hold the acquired properties. Following is a summary of our subsidiaries, each of which is owned directly by our company.

Name of Subsidiary

State of Formation

Date of Formation

Ownership

Pecan Grove MHP LLC

North Carolina

October 12, 2016

100

%*

Butternut MHP Land LLC

Delaware

March 1, 2017

100

%

Azalea MHP LLC

North Carolina

October 25, 2017

100

%

Holly Faye MHP LLC

North Carolina

October 25, 2017

100

%

Chatham Pines MHP LLC

North Carolina

October 31, 2017

100

%

Maple Hills MHP LLC

North Carolina

October 31, 2017

100

%

Lakeview MHP LLC

South Carolina

November 1, 2017

100

%

MHP Pursuits LLC

North Carolina

January 31, 2019

100

%

Mobile Home Rentals LLC

North Carolina

September 30, 2016

100

%

Hunt Club MHP LLC

South Carolina

March 8, 2019

100

%

B&D MHP LLC

South Carolina

April 4, 2019

100

%

Crestview MHP LLC

North Carolina

June 28, 2019

100

%

Springlake MHP LLC

Georgia

October 10, 2019

100

%

ARC MHP LLC

South Carolina

November 13, 2019

100

%

Countryside MHP LLC

South Carolina

March 12, 2020

100

%

Evergreen MHP LLC

Tennessee

March 17, 2020

100

%

*

We
originally established Pecan Grove MHP LLC as a 75% owned subsidiary. In January 2019, we acquired the remaining 25% interest.

The
Manufactured Housing Community Industry

Manufactured
housing communities are residential developments designed and improved for the placement of detached, single-family manufactured
homes that are produced off-site and installed and set on residential sites within the community. The owner of a manufactured
home leases the site on which it is located and the lessee of a manufactured home leases both the home and site on which the home
is located.

We
believe that manufactured housing is accepted by the public as a viable and economically attractive alternative to common stick-built
single-family housing. We believe that the affordability of the modern manufactured home makes it a very attractive housing alternative.
Manufactured housing is one of the only non-subsidized affordable housing options in the U.S. Demand for housing affordability
continues to increase, but supply remains static, as there are virtually no new manufactured housing communities being developed.
We are committed to becoming an industry leader in providing this affordable housing option and an improved level of service to
our residents, while producing an attractive and stable risk adjusted return to our investors.

2

A
manufactured housing community is a land-lease community designed and improved with home sites for the placement of manufactured
homes and includes related improvements and amenities. Each homeowner in a manufactured housing community leases from the community
a site on which a home is located. The manufactured housing community owner owns the underlying land, utility connections, streets,
lighting, driveways, common area amenities, and other capital improvements and is responsible for enforcement of community guidelines
and maintenance of the community. Generally, each homeowner is responsible for the maintenance of his or her home and upkeep of
his or her leased site. In some cases, customers may rent homes with the community owner’s maintaining ownership and responsibility
for the maintenance and upkeep of the home. This option provides flexibility for customers seeking a more affordable, shorter-term
housing option and enables the community owner to meet a broader demand for housing and improve occupancy and cash flow.

We
believe that manufactured housing communities have several characteristics that make them an attractive investment when compared
to certain other types of real estate, particularly multifamily, including:

●

Significant
Barriers to Entry. We believe that the supply of new manufactured housing
communities will be constrained due to significant barriers to entry in the industry,
including: (i) various zoning restrictions and negative zoning biases against manufactured housing
communities; (ii) substantial upfront costs associated with the development of infrastructure,
amenities and other offsite improvements required by various governmental agencies, and
(iii) a significant length of time before lease-up and revenues can commence.

●

Diminishing
Supply. Supply is decreasing due to redevelopment of older parks.

●

Large
Demographic Group of Potential Customers. We consider households earning
between $25,000 and $50,000 per year to be our core customer base. This demographic group
represents about 43 percent of overall U.S. households, according to 2016 U.S. Census
data.

●

Stable
Resident Base. We believe that manufactured housing communities tend
to achieve and maintain a stable rate of occupancy, due to the following factors: (i)
residents generally own their own homes; moving a manufactured home from one community
to another involves substantial cost and effort and often results in the abandonment
of on-site improvements made by the resident such as decks, garages, carports, and landscaping;
and (iii) residents enjoy a sense of community inherent in manufactured housing
communities similar to residential subdivisions.

●

Fragmented
Ownership of Communities. Manufactured housing community ownership
in the United States is highly fragmented, with a majority of manufactured housing
communities owned by individuals. The top five manufactured housing community owners
control approximately 7% of manufactured housing community home sites.

●

Low
Recurring Capital Requirements. Although manufactured housing community
owners are responsible for maintaining the infrastructure of the community, each homeowner
is responsible for the upkeep of his or her own home and home site, thereby reducing
the manufactured housing community owner’s ongoing maintenance expenses and
capital requirements.

●

Affordable
Homeowner Lifestyle. Manufactured housing communities offer an affordable
lifestyle typically unavailable in apartments, including lack of common walls, a yard
for each resident, the ability to park by the front door, and a sense of community.

Competition

There
are numerous private companies, but only three publicly-traded real estate investment trusts, or REITs, that compete in the
manufactured housing industry. Many of the private companies and one of the REITs, UMH Properties, Inc., may compete
with us for acquisitions of manufactured housing communities. Many of these companies have larger operations and greater financial
resources than we do. The number of competitors, however, is increasing as new entrants discover the benefits of the manufactured
housing asset class. We believe that due to the fragmented nature of ownership within the manufactured housing sector, the
level of competition is less than that in other commercial real estate sectors.

3

Competitive
Strengths

We
believe that the following competitive strengths enable us to compete effectively:

●

Deal
Sourcing. Our deal sourcing consists of marketed deals, pocket listings, and
off market deals. Marketed deals are properties that are listed with a broker who
exposes the property to the largest pool of buyers possible. Pocket listings are properties
that are presented by brokers to a limited pool of buyers. Off market deals are ones
that are not actively marketed. As a result of our network of relationships in
our industry, only two properties in our portfolio were marketed deals, the rest were
off-market or pocket listings.

●

Centralized
Operations. We have centralized many operational tasks, including accounting,
marketing, lease administration, and accounts payable. The use of professional
staff and technology allows us to scale efficiently and operate properties profitably
by reducing tasks otherwise completed at the property level.

●

Deal
Size. We believe that our small capitalization size with non-institutional deals
of less than 150 sites are accretive to our balance sheet. These sized properties
typically have less bidders at lower prices than larger properties. We can profitably
operate these smaller properties through our centralized operations.

Our
growth strategy is to acquire both stable and undervalued and underperforming manufactured housing properties that have current
income. We believe that we can enhance value through our professional asset and property management. Our property management services
are mainly comprised of tenant contracts and leasing, marketing vacancies, community maintenance, enforcement of community policies,
establishment and collection rent, and payment of vendors. Our lot and manufactured home leases are generally for one month and
auto renew monthly for an additional month.

Our
investment mission on behalf of our stockholders is to deliver an attractive risk-adjusted return with a focus on value creation,
capital preservation, and growth. In our ongoing search for acquisition opportunities we target and evaluate manufactured housing
communities nationwide.

We
may invest in improved and unimproved real property and may develop unimproved real property. These property investments may be
located throughout the United States, but to date we have concentrated in the Southeast portion of the United States. We are focused
on acquiring communities with significant upside potential and leveraging our expertise to build long-term capital appreciation.

We
are one of four public companies in the manufactured housing sector, but we are the only one not organized as a REIT, thereby
giving us flexibility to focus on growth through reinvestment of income and employing higher leverage upon acquisition than the
REITs traditionally utilize due to market held norms around 50-60%. This can give us a competitive advantage when bidding for
assets. Additionally, due to our small size, non-institutional sized deals of less than 150 sites, which have less bidders and
lower prices, are accretive to our balance sheet.

Regulation

Federal,
State and/or Local Regulatory Compliance

We
are subject to a variety of federal, state, and/or local statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations covering the purchase, development
and operation of real estate assets. These regulatory requirements include zoning and land use, worksite safety, traffic, and
other matters, such as local rules that may impose restrictive zoning and developmental requirements. We are subject to various
licensing, registration, and filing requirements in connection with the development and operation of certain real estate assets.
Additionally, state and/or local governments retain certain rights with respect to eminent domain which could enable them to restrict
or alter the use of our property. These requirements may lead to increases in our overall costs. The need to comply with these
requirements may significantly delay development with regard to properties, or lead us to alter our plans regarding certain real
estate assets. Some requirements, on a property by property evaluation, may lead to a determination that development of a particular
property would not be economically feasible, even if any or all necessary governmental approvals were obtained.

We
believe that each community has all material operating permits and approvals.

4

Environmental
Regulatory Compliance

Under
various federal, state and/or local laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of a property may
be required to investigate and/or clean-up hazardous or toxic substances released at that property. That owner or operator also
may be held liable to third parties for bodily injury or property damage (investigation and/or clean-up costs) incurred by those
parties in connection with the contamination at that site. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner
or operator knew of or otherwise caused the release of the hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, persons who arrange for
the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances or other regulated materials also may be liable for the costs of removal or
remediation of such substances at a disposal or treatment facility, whether or not such facility is owned or operated by such
persons.

The
costs of remediation or removal of hazardous or toxic substances can be substantial, and the presence of contamination, or the
failure to remediate contamination discovered, at a property we own or operate may adversely affect our ability to develop, sell,
lease, or borrow upon that property. Current and former tenants at a property we own may have, or may have involved, the use of
hazardous materials or generated hazardous wastes, and those situations could result in our incurring liabilities to remediate
any resulting contamination if the responsible party is unable or unwilling to do so.

In
addition, our properties may be exposed to a risk of contamination originating from other sources. While a property owner generally
is not responsible for remediating contamination that has migrated on-site from an off-site source, the contaminant’s presence
could have adverse effects on our ability to develop, construct on, operate, sell, lease, or borrow upon that property. Certain
environmental laws may create a lien on a contaminated site in favor of the government for damages and costs the government may
incur to remediate that contamination. Moreover, if contamination is discovered on a property, environmental laws may impose restrictions
on the manner in which that property may be used, or how businesses may be operated on that property, thus reducing our ability
to maximize our investment in that property. Our properties have been subjected to varying degrees of environmental assessment
at various times; however, the identification of new areas of contamination, a change in the extent or known scope of contamination,
or changes in environmental regulatory standards and/or cleanup requirements could result in significant costs to us.

Insurance
and Property Maintenance and Improvement Policies

Our
properties are insured against risks that may cause property damage and business interruption including events such as fire, business
interruption, general liability and if applicable, flood. Our insurance policies contain deductible requirements, coverage limits
and particular exclusions. It is our policy to maintain adequate insurance coverage on all of our properties; and, in the opinion
of our management, all of our properties are adequately insured. We also obtain title insurance insuring fee title to the properties
in an aggregate amount which we believe to be adequate.

It
is also our policy to properly maintain, modernize, expand and make improvements to its properties when required.

Employees

As
of December 31, 2019, we had 17 employees, including officers, all of whom are full-time employees.

ITEM 1A.

RISK
FACTORS.

An
investment in our Common Stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully read and consider all of the risks described
below, together with all of the other information contained or referred to in this report, before making an investment decision
with respect to our Common Stock or our company. If any of the following events occur, our financial condition, business and results
of operations (including cash flows) may be materially adversely affected. In that event, the market price of our Common Stock
could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Risks
Related to our Business and Industry

The
outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is growing and its impacts may cause a material adverse effect on our business.

In
December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus, or COVID-19, was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China. COVID-19 has since
spread to over 100 countries, including the United States. COVID-19 has also spread to every state in the United States, including
where we own and operate our properties and have our executive offices and principal operations. On March 11, 2020, the World
Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic, and on March 13, 2020, the United States declared a national emergency
with respect to COVID-19.

5

The
potential impact and duration of COVID-19 could have repercussions across regional and global economies and financial markets.
The outbreak of COVID-19 in many countries continues to adversely impact global economic activity and has contributed to significant
volatility and negative pressure in financial markets. The continued spread of COVID-19 has had, and could have a significantly
greater, material adverse effect on the U.S. economy as a whole, as well as the states and cities where we own properties in particular.

Many
states and cities, including where we own properties, have reacted by instituting quarantines, restrictions on travel, “stay
at home” rules, and restrictions on the types of business that may continue to operate. Many non-essential businesses in
the states and cities where our properties are located have been forced to close, including where our principal office is located.

These
restrictions have had a negative impact on the economy and business activity and may adversely impact the ability of our tenants,
many of whom may be restricted in their ability to work, to pay their rent as and when due. In addition, our property
managers may be limited in their ability to properly maintain our properties. Enforcing our rights as landlord against tenants who
fail to pay rent or otherwise do not comply with the terms of their leases may not be possible as many jurisdictions, include
those where are properties are located, have established rules and/or regulations preventing us from evicting tenants for certain
periods in response to COVID-19. If we are unable to enforce our rights as landlords, our business would be materially affected.

The
rapid development and fluidity of this situation precludes any prediction as to the ultimate adverse impact of COVID-19. Nevertheless,
COVID-19 and the current financial, economic and capital markets environment, and future developments in these and other areas
present material uncertainty and risk with respect to our performance, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We
may not be able to obtain adequate cash to fund our business.

Our
business requires access to adequate cash to finance our operations, distributions, capital expenditures, debt service obligations,
development and redevelopment costs and property acquisition costs, if any. We expect to generate the cash to be used for these
purposes primarily with operating cash flow, borrowings under secured and unsecured loans, proceeds from sales of strategically
identified assets and, when market conditions permit, through the issuance of debt and equity securities from time to time. We
may not be able to generate sufficient cash to fund our business, particularly if we are unable to renew leases, lease vacant
space or re-lease space as leases expire according to our expectations.

General
economic conditions and the concentration of our properties in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee may affect our ability
to generate sufficient revenue.

The
market and economic conditions in our current markets may significantly affect manufactured housing occupancy or rental rates.
Occupancy and rental rates, in turn, may significantly affect our revenues, and if our communities do not generate revenues sufficient
to meet our operating expenses, including debt service and capital expenditures, current cash flow and ability to pay or refinance
our debt obligations could be adversely affected. As a result of the current geographic concentration of our properties in Georgia,
North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee, we are exposed to the risks of downturns in the local economy or other local real
estate market conditions that could adversely affect occupancy rates, rental rates, and property values in these markets.

Other
factors that may affect general economic conditions or local real estate conditions include:

●

the
national and local economic climate which may be adversely affected by, among other factors,
plant closings, and industry slowdowns;

●

local
real estate market conditions such as the oversupply of manufactured home sites or a
reduction in demand for manufactured home sites in an area;

6

●

the
number of repossessed homes in a particular market;

●

the
lack of an established dealer network;

●

the
rental market which may limit the extent to which rents may be increased to meet increased
expenses without decreasing occupancy rates;

●

the
safety, convenience and attractiveness of our properties and the neighborhoods where
they are located;

●

zoning
or other regulatory restrictions;

●

competition
from other available manufactured housing communities and alternative forms of housing
(such as apartment buildings and single-family homes);

the
enactment of rent control laws or laws taxing the owners of manufactured homes.

Our
income would also be adversely affected if tenants were unable to pay rent or if sites were unable to be rented on favorable terms.
If we were unable to promptly renew the leases for a significant number of sites, or if the rental rates upon such renewal or
reletting were significantly lower than expected rates, then our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
In addition, certain expenditures associated with each property (such as real estate taxes and maintenance costs) generally are
not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in income from the property.

We
face risks generally associated with our debt.

We
finance a portion of our investments in properties through debt. As of December 31, 2019, our total indebtedness for borrowed
money was $31,520,782. We are subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flow
will be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest. In addition, debt creates other risks, including:

●

failure
to repay or refinance existing debt as it matures, which may result in forced disposition
of assets on disadvantageous terms;

●

refinancing
terms less favorable than the terms of existing debt; and

●

failure
to meet required payments of principal and/or interest.

We
face risks related to “balloon payments” and re-financings.

Certain
of our mortgages will have significant outstanding principal balances on their maturity dates, commonly known as “balloon
payments.” As of December 31, 2019, our total future minimum principal payments were $28,992,853. There can be no assurance
that we will be able to refinance the debt on favorable terms or at all. To the extent we cannot refinance debt on favorable terms
or at all, we may be forced to dispose of properties on disadvantageous terms or pay higher interest rates, either of which would
have an adverse impact on our financial performance and ability to service debt and make distributions.

We
may become more highly leveraged, resulting in increased risk of default on our obligations and an increase in debt service requirements
that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions.

We
have incurred, and may continue to incur, indebtedness in furtherance of our activities. We could become more highly leveraged,
resulting in an increased risk of default on our obligations and in an increase in debt service requirements, which could adversely
affect our financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to stockholders.

The
terms of our various credit agreements and other indebtedness require us to comply with a number of customary financial and other
covenants, such as maintaining debt service coverage and leverage ratios and maintaining insurance coverage. These covenants may
limit our flexibility in our operations, and breaches of these covenants could result in defaults under the instruments governing
the applicable indebtedness even if we had satisfied our payment obligations. If we were to default under our credit agreements,
our financial condition would be adversely affected.

7

A
change in the United States government policy regarding to the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) could impact our financial condition.

Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac are a major source of financing for the manufactured housing real estate sector. We could depend on Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac to finance growth by purchasing or guarantying manufactured housing community loans. In February 2011, the
Obama Administration released a report to Congress that included options, among others, to gradually shrink and eventually shut
down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. We do not know when or if Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac will restrict their support of lending to
our real estate sector or to us in particular. A final decision by the government to eliminate Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or reduce
their acquisitions or guarantees of our mortgage loans, may adversely affect interest rates, capital availability and our ability
to refinance our existing mortgage obligations as they come due and obtain additional long-term financing for the acquisition
of additional communities on favorable terms or at all.

We
face risks relating to the property management services that we provide.

There
are inherent risks in our providing property management services to the manufactured housing communities on the properties that
we own. The more significant of these risks include:

●

our
possible liability for personal injury or property damage suffered by our employees and
third parties, including our tenants, that are not fully covered by our insurance;

●

our
possible inability to keep our manufactured housing communities at or near full occupancy;

our
possible inability to adequately control expenses with respect to our properties.

We
may not be able to integrate or finance our acquisitions and our acquisitions may not perform as expected.

We
acquire and intend to continue to acquire manufactured housing communities on a select basis. Our acquisition activities and their
success are subject to the following risks:

●

we
may be unable to acquire a desired property because of competition from other well capitalized
real estate investors, including both publicly traded REITs and institutional investment
funds;

●

even
if we enter into an acquisition agreement for a property, it is usually subject to customary
conditions for closing, including completion of due diligence investigations to our satisfaction,
which may not be satisfied;

●

even
if we are able to acquire a desired property, competition from other real estate investors
may significantly increase the purchase price;

●

we
may be unable to finance acquisitions on favorable terms;

●

acquired
properties may fail to perform as expected;

●

acquired
properties may be located in new markets where we face risks associated with a lack of
market knowledge or understanding of the local economy, lack of business relationships
in the area and unfamiliarity with local governmental and permitting procedures; and

●

we
may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly acquisitions
of portfolios of properties, into our existing operations.

8

If
any of the above were to occur, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.

In
addition, we may acquire properties subject to liabilities and without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, with respect
to unknown liabilities. As a result, if a liability were to be asserted against us based on ownership of those properties, we
might have to pay substantial sums to settle it, which could adversely affect our cash flow.

New
acquisitions may fail to perform as expected and the intended benefits may not be realized, which could have a negative impact
on our operations.

We
intend to continue to acquire manufactured housing communities. However, newly acquired properties may fail to perform as expected
and could pose risks for our ongoing operations including the following:

●

integration
may prove costly or time-consuming and may divert management’s attention from the
management of daily operations;

●

difficulties
or an inability to access capital or increases in financing costs;

●

we
may incur costs and expenses associated with any undisclosed or potential liabilities;

●

unforeseen
difficulties may arise in integrating an acquisition into our portfolio;

●

expected
synergies may not materialize; and

●

we
may acquire properties in new markets where we face risks associated with lack of market
knowledge such as understanding of the local economy, the local governmental and/or local
permit procedures.

As
a result of the foregoing, we may not accurately estimate or identify all costs necessary to bring an acquired manufactured housing
communities up to standards established for our intended market position. As such, we cannot provide assurance that any acquisition
that we make will be accretive to us in the near term or at all. Furthermore, if we fail to realize the intended benefits of an
acquisition, it may have a negative impact on our operations.

Development
and expansion properties may fail to perform as expected and the intended benefits may not be realized, which could have a negative
impact on our operations.

We
may periodically consider development and expansion activities, which are subject to risks such as construction costs exceeding
original estimates and construction and lease-up delays resulting in increased construction costs and lower than expected revenues.
Additionally, there can be no assurance that these properties will operate better as a result of development or expansion activities
due to various factors, including lower than anticipated occupancy and rental rates causing a property to be unprofitable or less
profitable than originally estimated.

We
regularly expend capital to maintain, repair and renovate our properties, which could negatively impact our financial condition
and results of operations.

We
may, or we may be required to, from time to time make significant capital expenditures to maintain or enhance the competitiveness
of our manufactured housing communities. There can be no assurances that any such expenditures would result in higher occupancy
or higher rental rates.

We
may be unable to sell properties when appropriate because real estate investments are illiquid.

Real
estate investments generally cannot be sold quickly and, therefore, will tend to limit our ability to vary our property portfolio
promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. The inability to respond promptly to changes in the performance
of our property portfolio could adversely affect our financial condition and ability to service our debt and make distributions
to our stockholders.

We
may be unable to compete with our larger competitors, which may in turn adversely affect our profitability.

The
real estate business is highly competitive. We compete for manufactured housing community investments with numerous other real
estate entities, such as individuals, corporations, REITs, and other enterprises engaged in real estate activities. In many cases,
the competing concerns may be larger and better financed than we are, making it difficult for us to secure new manufactured housing
community investments. Competition among private and institutional purchasers of manufactured housing community investments has
led to increases in the purchase prices paid for manufactured housing communities and consequent higher fixed costs. To the extent
we are unable to effectively compete in the marketplace, our business may be adversely affected.

9

Actions
by our competitors may decrease or prevent increases in the occupancy and rental rates of our properties which could adversely
affect our business.

We
compete with other owners and operators of manufactured housing community properties, some of whom own properties similar to ours
in the same submarkets in which our properties are located. The number of competitive manufactured housing community properties
in a particular area could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease sites and increase rents charged at our properties
or at any newly acquired properties. In addition, other forms of multi-family residential properties, such as private and federally
funded or assisted multi-family housing projects and single-family housing, provide housing alternatives to potential tenants
of manufactured housing communities. If our competitors offer housing at rental rates below current market rates or below the
rental rates we currently charge our tenants, we may lose potential tenants, and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates
below those we currently charge in order to retain tenants when our tenants’ leases expire. As a result, our financial condition,
cash flow, cash available for distribution, and ability to satisfy our debt service obligations could be materially adversely
affected.

We
generally maintain insurance policies related to our business, including casualty, general liability and other policies covering
business operations, employees and assets. However, we may be required to bear all losses that are not adequately covered by insurance.
In addition, there are certain losses that are not generally insured because it is not economically feasible to insure against
them, including losses due to riots or acts of war. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs with respect
to one or more of our properties, then we could lose the capital we invested in the properties, as well as the anticipated profits
and cash flow from the properties and, in the case of debt that carries recourse to us, we would remain obligated for any mortgage
debt or other financial obligations related to the properties. Although we believe that our insurance programs are adequate, no
assurance can be given that we will not incur losses in excess of its insurance coverage, or that we will be able to obtain insurance
in the future at acceptable levels and reasonable cost.

We
are subject to significant regulation that inhibits our activities and may increase our costs. Local zoning and use laws, environmental
statutes and other governmental requirements may restrict expansion, rehabilitation and reconstruction activities. These regulations
may prevent us from taking advantage of economic opportunities. Legislation such as the Americans with Disabilities Act may require
us to modify our properties at a substantial cost and noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages
to private litigants. Future legislation may impose additional requirements. We cannot predict what requirements may be enacted
or amended or what costs we will incur to comply with such requirements. Costs resulting from changes in real estate laws, income
taxes, service or other taxes may adversely affect our funds from operations and our ability to pay or refinance our debt. Similarly,
changes in laws increasing the potential liability for environmental conditions existing on properties or increasing the restrictions
on discharges or other conditions may result in significant unanticipated expenditures, which would adversely affect our business
and results of operations.

Rent
control legislation may harm our ability to increase rents.

State
and local rent control laws in certain jurisdictions may limit our ability to increase rents and to recover increases in operating
expenses and the costs of capital improvements. We may purchase additional properties in markets that are either subject to rent
control or in which rent-limiting legislation exists or may be enacted.

Environmental
liabilities could affect our profitability.

Under
various federal, state and local laws, as well as local ordinances and regulations, an owner or operator of real estate is liable
for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous substances at, on, under or in such property, as well as certain
other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances. Such laws often impose such liability without regard to whether
the owner knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous substances. A conveyance of the property, therefore,
does not relieve the owner or operator from liability. As a current or former owner and operator of real estate, we may be required
by law to investigate and clean up hazardous substances released at or from the properties we currently own or operate or have
in the past owned or operated. We may also be liable to the government or to third parties for property damage, investigation
costs and cleanup costs. In addition, some environmental laws create a lien on the contaminated site in favor of the government
for damages and costs the government incurs in connection with the contamination. Contamination may adversely affect our ability
to sell or lease real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral. Persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment
of hazardous substances also may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of such substances at a disposal or treatment
facility owned or operated by another person. In addition, certain environmental laws impose liability for the management and
disposal of asbestos-containing materials and for the release of such materials into the air. These laws may provide for third
parties to seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury associated with asbestos-containing materials.
In connection with the ownership, operation, management, and development of real properties, we may be considered an owner or
operator of such properties and, therefore, are potentially liable for removal or remediation costs, and also may be liable for
governmental fines and injuries to persons and property. When we arrange for the treatment or disposal of hazardous substances
at landfills or other facilities owned by other persons, we may be liable for the removal or remediation costs at such facilities.
We are not aware of any environmental liabilities relating to our investment properties that would have a material adverse effect
on our business, assets, or results of operations. However, we cannot assure you that environmental liabilities will not arise
in the future and that such liabilities will not have a material adverse effect on our business, assets or results of operation.

10

Of
the twenty one manufactured housing communities we currently operate, five are on well and septic systems. At these locations,
we are subject to compliance with monthly, quarterly and yearly testing for contaminants as outlined by each state’s Department
of Environmental Protection Agencies. Currently, we are not subject to radon or asbestos monitoring requirements.

Additionally,
in connection with the management of the properties or upon acquisition or financing of a property, we authorize the preparation
of Phase I or similar environmental reports (which involves general inspections without soil sampling or ground water analysis)
completed by independent environmental consultants. Based on such environmental reports and our ongoing review of its properties,
as of the date of this offering circular, we are not aware of any environmental condition with respect to any of our properties
that we believe would be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
These reports, however, cannot reflect conditions arising after the studies were completed, and no assurances can be given that
existing environmental studies reveal all environmental liabilities, that any prior owner or operator of a property or neighboring
owner or operator did not create any material environmental condition not known to us, or that a material environmental condition
does not otherwise exist with respect to any one property or more than one property.

We
are subject to risks arising from litigation.

We
may become involved in litigation. Litigation can be costly, and the results of litigation are often difficult to predict. We
may not have adequate insurance coverage or contractual protection to cover costs and liability in the event we are sued, and
to the extent we resort to litigation to enforce our rights, we may incur significant costs and ultimately be unsuccessful or
unable to recover amounts we believe are owed to us. We may have little or no control of the timing of litigation, which presents
challenges to our strategic planning.

We
are dependent on key personnel.

Our
executive and other senior officers have a significant role in our success. Our ability to retain our management group or to attract
suitable replacements should any members of the management group leave depends on the competitive nature of the employment market.
The loss of services from key members of the management group or a limitation in their availability could adversely affect our
financial condition and cash flow. Further, such a loss could be negatively perceived in the capital markets.

Our
management is inexperienced in running a public entity.

With
the exception of Michael Z. Anise, our president, chief financial officer and a director, our management does not have prior experience
with the operation and management of a public entity. As a result, they will be learning as they proceed and may be forced to
rely more heavily on the expertise of outside professionals than they might otherwise, which in turn could lead to higher legal
and accounting costs and possible securities law compliance issues.

We
have one stockholder that can single-handedly control our company.

Our
largest stockholder is Gvest Real Estate Capital LLC, an entity whose sole owner is Raymond M. Gee, our chairman and chief executive
officer. At present, Gvest Real Estate Capital LLC owns 70% of our total issued and outstanding Common Stock. Under Nevada law,
this ownership position provides Mr. Gee with the almost unrestricted ability to control the business, management and strategic
direction of our company. If Mr. Gee chooses to exercise this control, his decisions regarding our company could be detrimental
to, or not in the best interests of our company and its other stockholders.

11

We
have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. If we fail to develop or maintain an effective
system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results and prevent fraud. As a result, current
and potential stockholders could lose confidence in our financial statements, which would harm the trading price of our Common
Stock.

Companies
that file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, including us, are subject to the requirements of Section
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or SOX 404. SOX 404 requires management to establish and maintain a system of internal
control over financial reporting and annual reports on Form 10-K filed under the Exchange Act to contain a report from management
assessing the effectiveness of a company’s internal control over financial reporting. Separately, under SOX 404, as amended
by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, public companies that are large accelerated filers or
accelerated filers must include in their annual reports on Form 10-K an attestation report of their regular auditors attesting
to and reporting on management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting. Non-accelerated filers and smaller
reporting companies, like us, are not required to include an attestation report of their auditors in annual reports.

A
report of our management is included under Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures.” We are a smaller reporting company
and, consequently, are not required to include an attestation report of our auditor in our annual report. However, if and when
we become subject to the auditor attestation requirements under SOX 404, we can provide no assurance that we will receive a positive
attestation from our independent auditors.

During
its evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, management identified
material weaknesses. These material weaknesses were associated with (i) our lack of proper segregation of duties due to the limited
number of employees within the accounting department and (ii) our lack of effective closing procedures. We are undertaking remedial
measures, which measures will take time to implement and test, to address these material weaknesses. There can be no assurance
that such measures will be sufficient to remedy the material weaknesses identified or that additional material weaknesses or other
control or significant deficiencies will not be identified in the future. If we continue to experience material weaknesses in
our internal controls or fail to maintain or implement required new or improved controls, such circumstances could cause us to
fail to meet our periodic reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in our financial statements, or adversely
affect the results of periodic management evaluations and, if required, annual auditor attestation reports. Each of the foregoing
results could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and lead to a decline in our stock price.

Risks
Related Ownership of Our Common Stock

Our
Common Stock is eligible for quotation on the Pink Market but few quotations have been made and limited trading has occurred in
our Common Stock. Due to the lack of an active trading market for our securities, you may have difficulty selling any shares you
purchase, which could result in the loss of your investment.

There
is presently limited demand for our Common Stock and no active public market exists for our Common Stock. Our Common Stock is
eligible for quotation on the Pink Market operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. The Pink Market is a regulated quotation service
that displays real-time quotes, last sale prices and volume information in over-the-counter securities. The Pink Market is not
an issuer listing service, market or exchange. The requirements for quotation on the Pink Market are considerably lower and less
regulated than those of an exchange. Because of this, it is possible that fewer brokers or dealers will be interested in making
a market in our Common Stock because the market for such securities is more limited, the stocks are more volatile, and the risk
to investors is greater, which may impact the liquidity of our Common Stock. Even if an active market begins to develop in our
Common Stock, the quotation of our Common Stock on the Pink Market may result in a less liquid market available for existing and
potential stockholders to trade Common Stock, could depress the trading price of our Common Stock and could have a long-term adverse
impact on our ability to raise capital in the future. If an active market is never developed for our Common Stock, it will be
difficult or impossible for you to sell any Common Stock you purchase.

We
cannot predict the extent to which an active public trading market for our Common Stock will develop or be sustained. If an active
public trading market does not develop or cannot be sustained, you may be unable to liquidate your investment in our Common Stock.

At
present, there is minimal public trading in our Common Stock. We cannot predict the extent to which an active public market for
our Common Stock will develop or be sustained due to a number of factors, including the fact that we are a small company that
is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors, and others in the investment community that generate
or influence sales volume, and that even if we came to the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk-averse and would be
reluctant to follow an unproven company such as ours or purchase or recommend the purchase of our shares of Common Stock until
such time as we became more seasoned and viable. As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity
in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity
that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on stock price. We cannot give you any assurance that an
active public trading market for our Common Stock will develop or be sustained. If such a market cannot be sustained, you may
be unable to liquidate your investment in our Common Stock.

12

Our
Common Stock may be subject to significant price volatility which may have an adverse effect on your ability to liquidate your
investment in our Common Stock.

The
market for our Common Stock may be characterized by significant price volatility when compared to seasoned issuers, and we expect
that our stock price will be more volatile than a seasoned issuer for the indefinite future. The potential volatility in our stock
price is attributable to a number of factors. First, our shares of Common Stock may be sporadically and/or thinly traded. As a
consequence of this lack of liquidity, the trading of relatively small quantities of shares by our stockholders may disproportionately
influence the price of those shares in either direction. The price for our shares could, for example, decline precipitously in
the event that a large number of our shares of Common Stock are sold on the market without commensurate demand, as compared to
a seasoned issuer that could better absorb those sales without adverse impact on its stock price. Secondly, an investment in us
is a speculative or “risky” investment due to our lack of meaningful profits to date and uncertainty of future profits.
As a consequence of this enhanced risk, more risk-adverse investors may, under the fear of losing all or most of their investment
in the event of negative news or lack of progress, be more inclined to sell their shares on the market more quickly and at greater
discounts than would be the case with the stock of a seasoned issuer.

We
may be subject to penny stock regulations and restrictions and you may have difficulty selling shares of our Common Stock.

The
SEC has adopted regulations which generally define so-called “penny stocks” to be an equity security that has a market
price less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exemptions. Our Common Stock
is a “penny stock” and is subject to Rule 15g-9 under the Exchange Act. This rule imposes additional sales practice
requirements on broker-dealers that sell such securities to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”
(generally, individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual incomes exceeding $200,000, or $300,000 together with
their spouses). For transactions covered by Rule 15g-9, a broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the
purchaser and have received the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to sale. As a result, this rule may
affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and may affect the ability of purchasers to sell any of our securities
in the secondary market, thus possibly making it more difficult for us to raise additional capital.

For
any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require delivery, prior to any transaction in penny stock, of
a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market. Disclosure is also required to be made about sales
commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally,
monthly statements are required to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information
on the limited market in penny stock.

There
can be no assurance that our Common stock will qualify for exemption from this rule. In any event, even if our Common Stock were
exempt from this rule, we would remain subject to Section 15(b)(6) of the Exchange Act, which gives the SEC the authority to restrict
any person from participating in a distribution of penny stock, if the SEC finds that such a restriction would be in the public
interest.

We
have never paid cash dividends on our Common Stock and do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.

We
have paid no cash dividends on our Common Stock to date and we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our Common Stock in
the near term. For the foreseeable future, we intend to retain any earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business,
and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our Common Stock. Accordingly, investors must be prepared to rely on sales
of their Common Stock after price appreciation to earn an investment return, which may never occur. Investors seeking cash dividends
should not purchase our Common Stock. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our board
of directors and will depend on our results of operations, financial condition, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed
by applicable law and other factors our board deems relevant.

Our
Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, which we refer to as our Series A Preferred Stock, and Series B Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock, which we refer to as our Series B Preferred Stock, have liquidation preferences that get paid prior to any payment
on our Common Stock. As a result, if we were to dissolve, liquidate, merge with another company or sell our assets, the holders
of our Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock would have the right to receive up to approximately $13,233,330 as
of December 31, 2019, plus any unpaid dividends, before any amount is paid to the holders of our Common Stock. The payment of
the liquidation preferences could result in common stockholders not receiving any consideration if we were to liquidate, dissolve
or wind up, either voluntarily or involuntarily. The existence of the liquidation preferences may also reduce the value of our
Common Stock, make it harder for us to sell shares of Common Stock in offerings in the future, or prevent or delay a change of
control.

We
may issue additional debt and equity securities that are senior to our Common Stock as to distributions and in liquidation, which
could materially adversely affect the value of the Common Stock.

In
the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources by entering into additional debt or debt-like financing that is secured
by all or up to all of our assets, or issuing debt or equity securities, which could include issuances of commercial paper, medium-term
notes, senior notes, subordinated notes or shares. In the event of our liquidation, our lenders and holders of our debt securities
would receive a distribution of our available assets before distributions to our stockholders. Any additional preferred securities,
if issued by our company, may have a preference with respect to distributions and upon liquidation that is senior to the preference
of our Common Stock, which could further limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. Because our decision to
incur debt and issue securities in our future offerings will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control,
we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings and debt financing.

Further,
market conditions could require us to accept less favorable terms for the issuance of our securities in the future. Thus, you
will bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the value of your Common Stock. In addition, we can change our leverage strategy
from time to time without approval of holders of our Common Stock, which could materially adversely affect the value of our Common
Stock.

Our
articles of incorporation, bylaws and Nevada law have anti-takeover provisions that could discourage, delay or prevent a change
in control, which may cause our stock price to decline.

Our
articles of incorporation, bylaws and Nevada law contain provisions which could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire
us, even if closing such a transaction would be beneficial to our stockholders. We are currently authorized to issue up to 5,000,000
shares of “blank check” Preferred Stock. This Preferred Stock may be issued in one or more series, the terms of which
may be determined at the time of issuance by our board of directors without further action by stockholders. The terms of any series
of Preferred Stock may include voting rights (including the right to vote as a series on particular matters), preferences as to
dividend, liquidation, conversion and redemption rights and sinking fund provisions. The issuance of any Preferred Stock could
materially adversely affect the rights of the holders of our Common Stock, and therefore, reduce the value of our Common Stock.
In particular, specific rights granted to future holders of Preferred Stock could be used to restrict our ability to merge with,
or sell our assets to, a third party and thereby preserve control by current management.

Provisions
of our articles of incorporation, bylaws and Nevada law also could have the effect of discouraging potential acquisition proposals
or making a tender offer or delaying or preventing a change in control, including changes a stockholder might consider favorable.
Such provisions may also prevent or frustrate attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our management. In particular,
our articles of incorporation, bylaws and Nevada law, as applicable, among other things, provide our board of directors with the
ability to alter our bylaws without stockholder approval, and provide that vacancies on our board of directors may be filled by
a majority of directors in office, although less than a quorum.

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS.

Not
applicable.

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES.

As
of December 31, 2019, we owned the following manufactured housing properties:

●

Pecan
Grove – a 81 lot, all-age community situated on 10.71 acres and located
in Charlotte, North Carolina. The average occupancy was 100%.

●

Butternut
– a 59 lot, all-age community situated on 13.13 acres and located in Corryton,
Tennessee, a suburb of Knoxville, Tennessee. The average occupancy was 78%.

14

●

Azalea
Hills – a 41 lot, all-age community situated on 7.46 acres and located
in Gastonia, North Carolina, a suburb of Charlotte, North Carolina. The average occupancy
was 98%.

●

Holly
Faye – a 37 lot all-age community situated on 8.01 acres and located in
Gastonia, North Carolina, a suburb of Charlotte North Carolina. The average occupancy
was 98%.

●

Lakeview
– a 97 lot all-age community situated on 17.26 acres in Spartanburg, South
Carolina. The average occupancy was 98%.

●

Chatham
Pines – a 49 lot all-age community situated on 23.57 acres and located
in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The average occupancy was 100%.

●

Maple
Hills – a 73 lot all-age community situated on 21.20 acres and located
in Mills River, North Carolina, which is part of the Asheville, North Carolina, Metropolitan
Statistical Area. The average occupancy was 78%.

●

Hunt
Club Forest – a 79 lot all-age community situated on 13.02 acres and located
in the Columbia, South Carolina metro area. The average occupancy was 100%.

●

B&D
– a 97 lot all-age community situated on 17.75 acres and located in Chester,
South Carolina. The average occupancy was 77%.

●

Crestview
– a 113 lot all-age community situated on 19.05 acres and located in East
Flat Rock, North Carolina. The average occupancy was 91%.

●

Spring
Lake – a 225 lot all-age community situated on 72.7 acres and located in
Warner Robins, Georgia. The average occupancy was 90%.

●

ARC
– a 182 lot all-age community situated on 39.34 acres and located in Lexington,
South Carolina. The average occupancy was 92%.

●

Countryside
– a 110 lot all-age community situated on 35 acres and located in Lancaster,
North Carolina. The average occupancy was 98%.

●

Evergreen
– a 65 lot all-age community situated on 28.4 acres and located in Dandridge,
Tennessee. The average occupancy was 97%.

The
average occupancy rates above represent an average of total monthly occupancy rates from January 1, 2019 through December 31,
2019. For the year ended December 31, 2019, our total portfolio weighted average occupancy rate was 95%.

On
March 12, 2020, we acquired a manufactured housing community known as Countryside Estates Mobile Home Park, which is located in
Lancaster, North Carolina and totals 110 sites.

On
March 17, 2020, we acquired a manufactured housing community known as Evergreen Pointe Mobile Home Park, which is located in Dandridge,
Tennessee and totals 65 sites.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS.

From
time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business.
However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time
to time that may harm our business. We are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

Our Common Stock is eligible for quotation
on the Pink Market under the symbol “MHPC.” The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and
low closing prices of our Common Stock. These prices reflect inter-dealer prices, without retain mark-up or commission, and may
not represent actual transactions.

Closing Prices

High

Low

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2018

1st Quarter

$

5.40

$

1.20

2nd Quarter

1.20

0.51

3rd Quarter

1.04

0.30

4th Quarter

1.00

0.30

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2019

1st Quarter

$

1.00

$

1.00

2nd Quarter

1.00

1.00

3rd Quarter

4.15

0.85

4th Quarter

4.50

2.70

Approximate Number of Holders of Our
Common Stock

As of April 10, 2020, there were approximately
207 registered holders of our Common Stock. This number excludes the shares owned by stockholders holding shares under nominee
security position listings.

Dividend Policy

Holders of our Series A Preferred Stock
are entitled to receive cumulative dividends in the amount of $0.017 per share each month, which is equivalent to the rate of 8%
of the $2.50 liquidation preference per share. Dividends on shares of our Series A Preferred Stock will continue to accrue even
if any of our agreements prohibit the current payment of dividends or we do not have earnings.

Holders of our Series B Preferred Stock
are entitled to receive cumulative dividends in the amount of $0.067 per share each month, which is equivalent to the annual rate
of 8% of the $10.00 liquidation preference per share; provided that upon an event of default (generally defined as our failure
to pay dividends when due or to redeem shares when requested by a holder), such amount shall be increased to $0.083 per month,
which is equivalent to the annual rate of 10% of the $10.00 liquidation preference per share. Dividends on shares of our Series
B Preferred Stock will continue to accrue even if any of our agreements prohibit the current payment of dividends or we do not
have earnings.

We have never declared dividends or paid
cash dividends on our Common Stock. Our board of directors will make any future decisions regarding dividends. We currently intend
to retain and use any future earnings for the development and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends
in the near future. Our board of directors has complete discretion on whether to pay dividends. Even if our board of directors
decides to pay dividends, the form, frequency and amount will depend upon our future operations and earnings, capital requirements
and surplus, general financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant.

See also Item 1.A. “Risk Factors—Risks
Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock— We have never paid cash dividends on our Common Stock and do not intend to pay
dividends for the foreseeable future.”

Except as set forth below, we have not
sold any securities during the 2019 fiscal year that were not previously disclosed in a quarterly report on Form 10-Q or a current
report on Form 8-K that was filed during the 2019 fiscal year.

We issued 50,000 shares of Common Stock
to our board members for services during the fourth quarter of 2019.

We issued 25,000 shares of Common Stock
for consulting services during the fourth quarter of 2019.

The issuance of these securities was made in reliance upon
an exemption from the registration requirements of Section 5 of the Securities Act.

Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table summarizes repurchases
of our Common Stock made during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019.

Period

Total number of shares (or units) purchased

Average price paid per share (or unit)

Total number of shares (or units) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs

Maximum number (or approximate dollar value) of shares (or units) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs

October 1, 2019-October 31, 2019

553,888

$

0.10

NA

NA

November 1, 2019-November 30, 2019

-

-

NA

NA

December 1, 2019-December 31, 2019

-

-

NA

NA

Total

553,888

$

0.10

NA

NA

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

Not applicable.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following management’s discussion
and analysis of financial condition and results of operations provides information that management believes is relevant to an assessment
and understanding of our plans and financial condition. The following selected financial information is derived from our
historical financial statements should be read in conjunction with such financial statements and notes thereto set forth elsewhere
herein and the “Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements” explanation included in the “Introductory
Notes” above.

Overview

We are a self-administered, self-managed,
vertically integrated owner and operator of manufactured housing communities. We earn income from leasing manufactured home sites
to tenants who own their own manufactured home and the rental of company-owned manufactured homes to residents of the communities.

As of December 31, 2019, we owned and
operated 18 manufactured housing communities containing approximately 1,133 developed sites and a total of 307 company-owned manufactured
homes. The communities are located in Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee. See Item 2. “Properties”
for a description of these manufactured housing communities.

We believe that manufactured housing is
accepted by the public as a viable and economically attractive alternative to common stick-built single-family housing. We believe
that the affordability of the modern manufactured home makes it a very attractive housing alternative. Manufactured housing is
one of the only non-subsidized affordable housing options in the U.S. Demand for housing affordability continues to increase, but
supply remains static, as there are virtually no new manufactured housing communities being developed. We are committed to becoming
an industry leader in providing this affordable housing option and an improved level of service to our residents, while producing
an attractive and stable risk adjusted return to our investors.

Recent Developments

Additional Closings of Regulation
A Offering

Subsequent to December 31, 2019, we sold
an aggregate of 92,640 shares of Series B Preferred Stock for total gross proceeds of $956,400 under the Regulation A offering
described below. After deducting a placement fee and other expenses, we received net proceeds of approximately $889,452. We also
issued 3,900 shares of Common Stock to early investors.

17

Countryside Acquisition

On January 7, 2020, MHP Pursuits LLC, our
wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a purchase and sale agreement with J & A Real Estate LLC, or J&A, for the purchase
of a manufactured housing community known as Countryside Estates Mobile Home Park, which is located in Lancaster, North Carolina
and totals 110 sites, for a total purchase price of $3.7 million. On March 12, 2020, the closing was completed and our newly formed
wholly owned subsidiary Countryside MHP LLC, or Countryside, purchased the property.

In connection with the closing, on March
12, 2020, Countryside issued a promissory note to J&A in the principal amount of $3,000,000. The remainder of the purchase
price, or $700,000, was paid in cash. The note bears interest at the rate of 5.5% per annum, or the maximum rate allowed by applicable
law, and is due and payable in full on March 20, 2050. Payments for the first twelve (12) months of the term of the note shall
be interest-only in the amount of $13,750 per month. Thereafter, principal and interest, in the amount of $17,201 per month, shall
be due and payable based upon a thirty (30) year amortization. If any monthly payment is not received by J&A within fifteen
(15) days after the applicable due date, Countryside must pay a late charge in an amount equal to the delinquent amount then due
multiplied by 4%. Countryside may prepay the note, in whole or in party, at any time without penalty.

The note also contains customary events
of default, including: (i) if Countryside shall be in default in the payment of any principal, interest or other amount due under
the note and such default shall not be cured within five (5) days after written notice from J&A; (ii) if Countryside shall
be in default in the performance of any non-monetary obligation in the note and such default shall not be cured within thirty (30)
days after written notice from J&A; or (iii) if Countryside shall default in the due observation or performance of any covenant,
condition or agreement contained in the mortgage described below and such default shall not be cured within thirty (30) days after
written notice from J&A. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, interest on the aggregate outstanding indebtedness (including
accrued interest) of the note shall increase to 5.5% per annum plus the U.S. Prime Rate as measured and reported by the Wall Street
Journal and in effect on the date of default, until such aggregate indebtedness is paid in full.

The note is secured by a mortgage, assignment
of rents and leases, security agreement and fixture filing with respect to the property. The mortgage contains customary representations,
warranties and covenants by Countryside and remedies upon an event of default under the note.

Evergreen Acquisition

On January 1, 2020, MHP Pursuits LLC, our
wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Evergreen Marketing LLC for the purchase of a manufactured
housing community known as Evergreen Pointe Mobile Home Park, which is located in Dandridge, Tennessee and totals 65 sites, for
a total purchase price of $1,438,000. On March 17, 2020, the closing was completed and our newly formed wholly owned subsidiary
Evergreen MHP LLC, or Evergreen, purchased the property.

In connection with the closing, on March
17, 2020, Evergreen entered into a loan agreement with Hunt Mortgage Capital, LLC, or the Lender, for a loan in the principal amount
of $1,150,000 and Evergreen issued a promissory note to the Lender in the principal amount of $1,150,000. The remainder of the
purchase price, or $288,000, was paid in cash.

The note bears interest at a rate of 3.99%
per annum and is due and payable on April 1, 2032. The monthly payments under the note are equal to $5,483.65. If any monthly payment
is not received by the Lender within ten (10) days after the applicable due date, Evergreen must pay a late charge in an amount
equal to the delinquent amount then due multiplied by 5%. Furthermore, if any payment remains past due for thirty (30) days or
more, interest on such unpaid amounts shall accrue at the lesser of 7.99% or the maximum rate allowed by applicable law. Evergreen
may prepay the note in full, but not in part, at any time if it pays a prepayment premium calculated in accordance with the loan
agreement.

The note is secured by the property and
guaranteed by Mr. Raymond M. Gee, our Chief Executive Officer, Gvest Capital Real Estate LLC, an entity controlled by Mr. Gee,
and our company (which we collectively refer to as the Guarantors).

The loan agreement was subject to customary closing conditions
and contains customary representations and warranties. The loan agreement also contains customary financial and other covenants
for a loan of this type. The loan agreement also contains customary events of default, some of which are subject to cure periods
as set forth in the loan agreement, including, but not limited to: (i) any failure by Evergreen to pay or deposit when due any
amount required by the note, the loan agreement or any other loan document (as defined in the loan agreement); (ii) any failure
by Evergreen to maintain the insurance coverage required by any loan document; (iii) if any warranty, representation, certification,
or statement of Evergreen or any Guarantor in the loan agreement or any of the other loan documents is false inaccurate, or misleading
in any material respect when made; (iv) the fraud, gross negligence, willful misconduct, or material misrepresentation or material
omission by or on behalf of Evergreen or any Guarantor or any of their officers, directors, trustees, partners, members, or managers
in connection with the application for, or creation of, the loan or any financial statement, rent roll, or other report or information
provided to Lender during the term of the loan; (v) the occurrence of any transfer (as defined in the loan agreement) not permitted
by the loan documents; (vi) the occurrence of a bankruptcy event (as defined in the loan agreement); (vii) if a Guarantor is a
natural person, the death of such individual, unless certain requirements set forth in the loan agreement are met; (viii) the occurrence
of a guarantor bankruptcy event (as defined in the loan agreement), unless certain requirements of the loan agreement are met;
(ix) any failure by Evergreen or a Guarantor to comply with certain covenants in the loan agreement; or (x) any failure by Evergreen
to perform any of its obligations under the loan agreement or any loan document as and when required.

18

Repayment of Metrolina Note

In February 2020, we repaid $1,000,000
of principal and accrued interest on the Metrolina promissory note referred to below.

Loan
Refinancing

On April 1, 2020, we refinanced the
loans for Butternut MHP Land LLC described below with the existing lender to increase the loan amount to $1,388,019 and to extend
the maturity date to April 10, 2025. In addition, the interest rate was changed to 6% per annum, provided that on April 10, 2023
and thereafter, the interest rate shall be equal to (i) the per annum rate of interest identified as the “Prime Rate”
as published in the monthly rates section of the Wall Street Journal plus (ii) 1% per annum, adjusted as the first day of each
calendar quarter. The loan, as modified, is secured by the real estate assets of Butternut MHP Land LLC and is guaranteed by our
company and Raymond M. Gee, who received a loan guarantee fee of $70,000.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth key components
of our results of operations during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Year Ended December 31,

Increase (Decrease)

2019

2018

Amount

Percent

Revenue

Rental and related income

$

2,968,472

$

1,975,312

$

986,382

50.28

%

Management fees, related party

48,319

4,000

44,319

1107.98

%

Homes sales

4,900

21,000

(16,100

)

(76.67

)%

Total revenues

3,021,691

2,000,312

1,014,601

50.65

%

Community operating expenses

Repair and maintenance

234,770

135,131

92,860

73.74

%

Real estate taxes

142,187

81,024

61,163

75.49

%

Utilities

212,719

149,516

63,023

42.27

%

Insurance

83,975

54,079

29,896

55.28

%

General and administrative expense

476,137

256,631

219,506

85.53

%

Total community operating expenses

1,149,788

676,381

466,629

69.99

%

Corporate payroll and overhead

1,253,383

1,030,527

222,856

21.63

%

Depreciation and amortization expense

786,179

534,290

251,889

47.14

%

Interest expense

1,312,469

1,001,455

311,014

31.06

%

Refinancing costs

552,272

-

552,272

100.00

%

Total expenses

5,054,091

3,242,653

1,804,660

55.86

%

Net loss before provision for income taxes

(2,032,400

)

(1,242,341

)

(790,059

)

63.59

%

Provision for income taxes

6,347

8,286

(1,939

)

(23.40

)%

Net loss

$

(2,038,747

)

$

(1,250,627

)

$

(788,120

)

63.02

%

Net income attributable to the non-controlling interest

-

45,766

(45,766

)

(100.00

)%

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

$

(2,038,747

)

$

(1,296,393

)

$

(742,354

)

57.26

%

19

Revenues. For the year ended
December 31, 2019, we had total revenues of $3,021,691, as compared to $2,000,312 for the year ended December 31, 2018, an increase
of $1,021,379, or 51.06%. The increase was primarily due to $867,180 of rental income from the acquisition of five manufactured
housing communities during 2019. The remaining increase was due to an average 7% increase in occupancy and rental rate increases,
and $4,900 related to home sales, and we also recorded $48,319 of property management revenues from a related party in 2019.

Community Operating Expenses. For the year ended
December 31, 2019, we had total community operating expenses of $1,149,788, as compared to $676,381 for the year ended December
31, 2018, an increase of $473,407. The increase in community operating expenses was primarily due $319,072 of expenses from the
acquisition of five manufactured housing communities during 2019. Excluding the acquisitions, our community operating expenses
increased resulting from an increase in repair and maintenance costs of $87,960 from prior year.

Corporate Payroll and Overhead Expenses.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we had corporate payroll and overhead expenses of $1,253,383, as compared to $1,030,527 for
the year ended December 31, 2018, an increase of $222,856, or 21.63%. This increase was primarily due to stock compensation expense
of $349,950 during 2019 compared to $171,500 during 2018.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we had depreciation and amortization expense of $786,179, as compared to $534,290 for the
year ended December 31, 2018, an increase of $251,889, or 47.14%. The increase was primarily due to the acquisition of five manufactured
housing communities during 2019.

Interest Expense. For the
year ended December 31, 2019, we had interest expense of $1,312,469, as compared to $1,001,455 for the year ended December 31,
2018, an increase of $311,014, or 31.06%. The increase was primarily related to the five additional loans related to the five acquisitions
of manufactured housing communities during 2019.

Refinancing Costs. During
the year ended December 31, 2019, we refinanced a total of $4,920,750 from our current loans payable to $8,241,000 of new notes
payable from five of our communities, resulting in an additional loan payable of $3,320,859. We used the additional loans payable
proceeds from the refinance to retire our related party note payable of $2,754,550 plus accrued interest. As of December 31, 2019,
we wrote off refinancing cost totaling $552,272.

Net Loss. The factors described
above resulted in a net loss of $2,038,747 for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to $1,296,393 for the year ended December
31, 2018, an increase of $788,120, or 63.02%.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2019, we had cash and
cash equivalents of $4,146,411. The ability of our company to continue its operations is dependent on management’s plans,
which include the raising of capital through debt and/or equity markets with some additional funding from other traditional financing
sources, including term notes, until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements.

We will require additional funding to finance
the growth of our current and expected future operations as well as to achieve our strategic objectives. We believe that our current
available cash along with anticipated revenues may be insufficient to meet our cash needs for the near future. There can be no
assurance that financing will be available in amounts or terms acceptable to us, if at all.

Our working capital has been used in operating
activities, a related party revolving note and proceeds from our Regulation A offering described below. We plan to meet our short-term
liquidity requirements of approximately $1,577,513 for the next twelve months, generally through available cash as well as net
cash provided by operating activities and availability under the existing $1.5 million revolving note described below, of which
$797,906 was outstanding as of December 31, 2019. We also have availability from lenders under loan agreements for capital expenditure
needs on acquisitions. We expect these resources to help us meet operating working capital requirements.

20

Summary of Cash Flow

The following table provides detailed information
about our net cash flow for years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

Cash Flow

Year Ended December 31,

2019

2018

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

$

(950,236

)

$

38,475

Net cash used in investing activities

(22,017,784

)

(210,247

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

26,656,160

274,108

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

3,688,140

102,336

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

458,271

355,935

Cash and cash equivalent at end of period

$

4,146,411

$

458,271

Net cash used in operating activities was
$950,236 for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to $38,475 net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended
December 31, 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the net loss of $2,038,747, a decrease in other assets in the amount of
$457,540 due to lender’s escrowed funds held by lender at closing to be released back to us upon the completion of certain
capital improvement projects, offset by depreciation and amortization in the amount of $738,789, stock compensation expense in
the amount of $349,950, an increase in accounts payable of $156,315, and increase in security deposits $184,886, were the primary
drivers of the net cash used in operating activities. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the net loss of $1,250,627, offset
by depreciation and amortization in the amount of $534,290, an increase in accrued expenses in the amount of $476,459, and stock
compensation expense in the amount of $171,500, were the primary drivers of the net cash provided by operating activities.

Net cash used in investing activities was
$22,017,784 for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to $210,247 for the year ended December 31, 2018. Net cash used in
investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 consisted of $22,022,684 of the purchase of property, offset by proceeds
from sale of property in the amount of $4,900. Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 consisted
of the purchase of property in the amount of $231,247, offset by proceeds of sale of property in the amount of $21,000.

Net cash provided by financing activities
was $26,656,160 for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to $274,108 for the year ended December 31, 2018. For the year
ended December 31, 2019, net cash provided by financing activities consisted of proceeds from notes payable in the amount of $25,079,000,
proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock in the amount of $8,670,606, proceeds from line of credit in the amount of $2,695,000,
and proceeds from issuance of common stock in the amount of $72,875, offset by repayment of notes payable in the amount of $5,172,234,
repayment of line of credit in the amount of $3,719,550, capitalized financing costs of $608,541, repayments of related party note
of $99,801, and purchase of treasury stock in the amount of $119,337. For the year ended December 31, 2018, net cash provided by
financing activities consisted of proceeds from related party note in the amount of $448,750 and proceeds from note payables in
the amount of $117,014, offset by repayment of notes payable in the amount of $236,551 and non-controlling distributions in the
amount of $55,105.

Regulation A Offering

On November 1, 2019, we launched an offering
under Regulation A of Section 3(6) of the Securities Act for Tier 2 offerings, pursuant to which we are offering up to 1,000,000
shares of Series B Preferred Stock at an offering price of $10.00 per share, for a maximum offering amount of $10,000,000. In addition,
we are offering bonus shares to early investors in this offering, whereby the first 400 investors will receive, in addition to
Series B Preferred Stock, 100 shares of Common Stock, regardless of the amount invested, for a total of 40,000 shares of Common
Stock.

As of December 31, 2019, we sold an aggregate
of 409,722 shares of Series B Preferred Stock for total gross proceeds of $4,097,220. After deducting a placement fee and other
expenses, we received net proceeds of approximately $3,796,673. We also issued 15,400 shares of Common Stock to early investors
in this offering with a fair value of $4,158.

21

Secured Promissory Notes

We have issued promissory notes payable
to lenders related to the acquisition of our manufactured housing communities. These promissory notes range from 4.5% to 7.0% with
20 to 25 years principal amortization. Two of the promissory notes had an initial 6 months period on interest only payments. The
promissory notes are secured by the real estate assets and $3,004,119 for three assets were guaranteed by Raymond M. Gee, our chairman,
chief executive officer and owner of the principal stockholder of our company.

During the year ended December 31, 2019,
we refinanced a total of $4,940,750 from current loans payable to $8,241,000 of new notes payable from five of the communities,
resulting in an additional loan payable of $3,320,859. We used the additional loans payable proceeds from the refinance to retire
the related party note payable described below. As of December 31, 2019, we wrote off mortgage costs of $68,195 and capitalized
$275,519 of mortgage costs due to the refinancing.

As of December 31, 2019, the outstanding
balance on these notes was $28,992,876. The following are terms of these notes.

Maturity
Date

Interest
Rate

Balance
12/31/19

Balance
12/31/18

Butternut MHP Land LLC

03/30/20

6.500

%

$

1,114,819

$

1,134,971

Butternut MHP Land LLC Mezz

04/01/27

7.000

%

280,013

287,086

Pecan Grove MHP LLC

11/04/26

4.500

%

3,095,274

1,270,577

Azalea MHP LLC

11/10/27

5.000

%

835,445

598,571

Holly Faye MHP LLC

10/01/38

4.000

%

574,096

462,328

Chatham MHP LLC

12/01/22

5.125

%

1,771,506

1,366,753

Lakeview MHP LLC

12/01/22

5.125

%

1,857,266

1,222,521

B&D MHP LLC

05/02/29

5.500

%

1,854,788

-

Hunt Club MHP LLC

05/01/24

5.750

%

1,447,364

-

Crestview MHP LLC

08/01/24

5.500

%

4,173,652

-

Springlake MHP LLC

11/14/22

4.500

%

4,000,000

-

ARC MHP LLC

01/01/30

5.500

%

5,300,000

-

Maple Hills MHP LLC

01/01/23

5.125

%

2,688,653

2,743,303

Totals note payables

28,992,876

9,086,100

Discount Direct Lender Fees

(692,454

)

(140,758

)

Total net of Discount

$

28,359,247

$

8,945,352

Metrolina Promissory Note

On May 8, 2017, we issued a promissory
note to Metrolina Loan Holdings, LLC, or Metrolina, in the principal amount of $3,000,000. The note is interest only payment based
on 8%, and 10% deferred until maturity to be paid with principal balance. The note originally awarded Metrolina 455,000 shares
of Common Stock as consideration, which resulted in making Metrolina a related party due to its significant ownership. During
the year ended December 31, 2019, we paid off the entire balance on the note of $2,754,550 plus interest and amended the agreement
to allow for the redeployment of the $3,000,000 available, eliminated the conversion option whereby Metrolina could convert the
ratio of total outstanding debt at time of exercise of the option into an amount of newly issued shares of our Common Stock determined
by dividing the outstanding indebtedness by $3,000,000 multiplied by 10% with a cap of 864,500 shares. The amendment resulted
in issuing an additional 545,000 shares with a fair value of $305,200 for a total of 1,000,000 shares awarded to Metrolina. The
note gives Metrolina the right and option to purchase its pro rata share of debt or equity securities issued to maintain up to
10% equity interest in our company at the most recent price of any equity transaction for seven years from the amendment dated
February 26, 2019. As of December 31, 2019, the balance on this note was $1,730,000. The note is guaranteed by Mr. Gee.

Revolving Promissory Note

On October 1, 2017, we issued a revolving
promissory note to Raymond M. Gee, our chairman and chief executive officer, pursuant to which we may borrow up to $1,500,000 from
Mr. Gee on a revolving basis for working capital purposes. This note has a five-year term with no annual interest and principal
payment is deferred until the maturity date. As of December 31, 2019, the outstanding balance on this note was $797,906. During
the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we recorded imputed interest related to the note of $87,577 and $44,695, respectively.

22

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2019, we had no off-balance
sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial
condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with United States generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements
requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses,
and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our consolidated financial statements. Actual results
may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Critical accounting policies are defined
as those that involve significant judgment and potentially could result in materially different results under different assumptions
and conditions. Management believes the following critical accounting policies are affected by our more significant judgments and
estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition. We
follow Topic 606 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting, or FASB, Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, for
revenue recognition and Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2014-09. On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2014-09, which is a comprehensive
new revenue recognition model that requires revenue to be recognized in a manner to depict the transfer of goods or services to
a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. We consider
revenue realized or realizable and earned when all the five following criteria are met: (1) identification of the contract with
a customer, (2) identification of the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determination of the transaction price, (4)
allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (5) recognition of revenue when (or as)
we satisfy a performance obligation. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under ASU 2014-09,
while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported under the previous accounting standards. There was no
impact to revenues as a result of applying ASU 2014-09 for the year ended December 31, 2019, and there have not been any significant
changes to our business processes, systems, or internal controls as a result of implementing the standard. We recognize rental
income revenues on a monthly basis based on the terms of the lease agreement which are for either the land or a combination of
both, the mobile home and land. Home sales revenues are recognized upon the sale of a home with an executed sales agreement. We
have deferred revenues from home lease purchase options and records those option fees as deferred revenues and then record them
as revenues when (1) the lease purchase option term is completed and title has been transferred, or (2) the leaseholder defaults
on the lease terms resulting in a termination of the agreement which allows us to keep any payments as liquidated damages. We
record an allowance for bad debts as rental income is probable not to be collected. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018,
our allowance for doubtful accounts was $10,117 and $59,657, respectively.

Acquisitions. We account
for acquisitions in accordance with ASC 805, “Business Combinations,” and allocate the purchase price of the property
based upon the fair value of the assets acquired, which generally consist of land, site and land improvements, buildings and improvements
and rental homes. We allocate the purchase price of an acquired property generally determined by internal evaluation as well as
third-party appraisal of the property obtained in conjunction with the purchase.

Investment Property and Equipment
and Depreciation. Property and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation for sites and building is computed principally
on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets (ranging from 15 to 25 years). Depreciation of improvements
to sites and buildings, rental homes and equipment and vehicles is computed principally on the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets (ranging from 3 to 25 years). Land development costs are not depreciated until they are put in use,
at which time they are capitalized as sites and land improvements. Interest expense pertaining to land development costs are capitalized.
Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred and improvements are capitalized. The costs and related accumulated
depreciation of property sold or otherwise disposed of are removed from the financial statement and any gain or loss is reflected
in the current year’s results of operations.

Impairment Policy. We apply
FASB ASC 360-10, “Property, Plant & Equipment,” to measure impairment in real estate investments. Rental properties
are individually evaluated for impairment when conditions exist which may indicate that it is probable that the sum of expected
future cash flows (on an undiscounted basis without interest) from a rental property is less than the carrying value under its
historical net cost basis. These expected future cash flows consider factors such as future operating income, trends and prospects
as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. Upon determination that a permanent impairment has occurred,
rental properties are reduced to their fair value. For properties to be disposed of, an impairment loss is recognized when the
fair value of the property, less the estimated cost to sell, is less than the carrying amount of the property measured at the time
there is a commitment to sell the property and/or it is actively being marketed for sale. A property to be disposed of is reported
at the lower of its carrying amount or its estimated fair value, less its cost to sell. Subsequent to the date that a property
is held for disposition, depreciation expense is not recorded.

23

Stock-Based Compensation.
All stock based payments to employees, nonemployee consultants, and to nonemployee directors for their services as directors, including
any grants of restricted stock and stock options, are measured at fair value on the grant date and recognized in the statements
of operations as compensation or other expense over the relevant service period in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Stock based
payments to nonemployees are recognized as an expense over the period of performance. Such payments are measured at fair value
at the earlier of the date a performance commitment is reached or the date performance is completed. In addition, for awards that
vest immediately and are nonforfeitable the measurement date is the date the award is issued. We recorded stock option expense
of $4,774 and $69 during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments.
We follow paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB ASC for disclosures about fair value of our financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37
of the FASB ASC to measure the fair value of our financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value
measurements and related disclosures, paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to
valuation techniques used to measure fair value into broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted
prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13,
“Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” ASU
2016-13 requires that entities use a new forward looking “expected loss” model that generally will result in the earlier
recognition of allowance for credit losses. The measurement of expected credit losses is based upon historical experience, current
conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. ASU No. 2016-13 is
effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15,
2019. We are currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have on the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,
“Leases.” ASU 2016-02 amends the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to
recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. The standard requires a modified
retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option
to use certain transition relief. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018.
Early adoption is permitted. We have evaluated the impact this standard had on the consolidated financial statements and determined
that it had no impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07
“Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” This
ASU relates to the accounting for non-employee share-based payments. The amendment in this ASU expands the scope of Topic 718 to
include all share-based payment transactions in which a grantor acquired goods or services to be used or consumed in a grantor’s
own operations by issuing share-based payment awards. The ASU excludes share-based payment awards that relate to (1) financing
to the issuer or (2) awards granted in conjunction with selling goods or services to customers as part of a contract accounted
for under Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts from Customers. The share-based payments are to be measured at grant-date fair value
of the equity instruments that the entity is obligated to issue when the good or service has been delivered or rendered and all
other conditions necessary to earn the right to benefit from the equity instruments have been satisfied. This standard will be
effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that
fiscal year. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim
periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted, but no earlier than an entity’s
adoption of Topic 606. We have evaluated the impact this standard had on the consolidated financial statements and determined that
it had no impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Management does not believe that any other
recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not applicable.

24

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

The full text of our audited consolidated financial statements
begins on page F-1 of this annual report.

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Disclosure controls and procedures refer to controls and other procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that such information
is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate,
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As required by Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange
Act, our management has carried out an evaluation, with the participation and under the supervision of our chief executive officer
and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as of
December 31, 2019. Based upon, and as of the date of this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer determined
that, because of the material weaknesses described below, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

Management’s Annual Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for our company. Internal control over financial reporting refers
to the process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting
officer, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP,
and includes those policies and procedures that:

(1)

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of our assets;

(2)

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation
of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with
the authorization of our management and directors; and

(3)

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition,
use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Our management evaluated the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. In making this evaluation, management used the framework
established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission, or COSO. The COSO framework summarizes each of the components of a company’s internal control system, including
(i) the control environment, (ii) risk assessment, (iii) control activities, (iv) information and communication, and (v) monitoring.
Based on our evaluation, we determined that, as of December 31, 2019, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective
due to the following material weaknesses.

●

We lack proper segregation of duties due to the limited number of employees within the accounting
department.

●

We lack effective closing procedures.

To mitigate the current limited resources
and limited employees, we rely heavily on direct management oversight of transactions, along with the use of legal and accounting
professionals. As we grow, we expect to increase our number of employees, which will enable us to implement adequate segregation
of duties within the internal control framework.

25

In order to cure the foregoing material
weakness, we have taken or plan to take the following remediation measures:

●

We have implemented dual signatures and approvals on all payments.

●

We have added and plan to continue to add additional employees to assist in the financial closing
procedures.

●

As necessary, we will continue to engage consultants or outside accounting firms in order to ensure
proper accounting for our consolidated financial statements.

We intend to complete the remediation of
the material weaknesses discussed above as soon as practicable but we can give no assurance that we will be able to do so. Designing
and implementing an effective disclosure controls and procedures is a continuous effort that requires us to anticipate and react
to changes in our business and the economic and regulatory environments and to devote significant resources to maintain a financial
reporting system that adequately satisfies our reporting obligations. The remedial measures that we have taken and intend to take
may not fully address the material weaknesses that we have identified, and material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures
may be identified in the future. Should we discover such conditions, we intend to remediate them as soon as practicable. We are
committed to taking appropriate steps for remediation, as needed.

All internal control systems, no matter
how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness
to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial
Reporting

We regularly review our system of internal
control over financial reporting and make changes to our processes and systems to improve controls and increase efficiency, while
ensuring that we maintain an effective internal control environment. Changes may include such activities as implementing new, more
efficient systems, consolidating activities, and migrating processes.

Other than in connection with the implementation
of the remedial measures described above, there were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION.

We have no information to disclose that
was required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K during fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019, but was not reported.

26

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

The following sets forth information about our directors and
executive officers as of the date of this report:

Name

Age

Position

Raymond M. Gee

58

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Michael Z. Anise

43

President, Chief Financial Officer and Director

Andrew Coatley

37

Chief Operating Officer

Adam A. Martin

47

Chief Investment Officer

Terry Robertson

76

Director

James L. Johnson

53

Director

William H. Carter

71

Director

Raymond M. Gee. Mr. Gee
has served as chairman of our board of directors and chief executive officer of our company in October 2017 as a result of the
merger of Mobile Home Rental Holdings LLC with our company. Mr. Gee has 30 years of experience in commercial real estate, development,
and structured finance. He has also served as the chief executive officer of Gvest Capital LLC, which provides management and
administrative services to various investment and asset ownership entities, since 2012. Prior to forming Gvest Capital LLC, he
was the head of real estate and structured products for Royal & SunAlliance and was in charge of a multi-billion-dollar diversified
portfolio. Previously he headed the Latin American real estate practice for Arthur Andersen in Mexico City. Mr. Gee is a graduate
of the University of Oklahoma with a BBA in Finance/Real Estate. Mr. Gee was selected to serve on our board of directors
due to his management experience in our industry.

Michael Z. Anise. Mr. Anise
has served as our chief financial officer and as a member of our board of directors since September 2017 and has served as our
president since August 2019. From 2011 to 2017, Mr. Anise was chief financial officer of Crossroads Financial, a commercial finance
company. Mr. Anise earned his B.S. degree in Accounting, with a minor in Finance, from Florida Atlantic University. Mr. Anise was
selected to serve on our board of directors due to finance experience.

Andrew Coatley. Mr. Coatley
has served as our chief operating officer since October 2019. From 2014 to October 2019, he was the executive property director
for Bainbridge Companies providing operational leadership. Mr. Coatley earned a B.S. in education from The Defiance of Ohio.

Adam A. Martin. Mr. Martin
has served as our chief investment officer since October 2017. From 2009 to September 2017, he was CIO of Gvest Capital LLC, a
company that provides management and administrative services to various investment and asset ownership entities. Mr. Martin earned
is B.A. degree in Finance and Masters degree in Land Economics and Real Estate from Texas A&M University.

27

Terry Robertson. Dr. Robertson
has served as a member of our board of directors since December 2018. Since 2007, Mr. Robertson has served as consultant at ROBERTSON
Appraisal & Consulting, a real estate appraisal and consulting firm that he founded. Prior to that, he worked at Carroll&Carroll
Real Estate Appraisers. Dr. Robertson earned his B.B.A. degree in Finance and his Ph.D. from the University of Georgia, and is
Professor Emeritus of Price College of Business of the University of Oklahoma. Mr. Robertson is an author of articles and books
relating to corporate financial structure, real estate valuation and regional economic development. Dr. Robertson was selected
to serve on our board of directors due to finance and real estate investment background.

James L. Johnson. Mr. Johnson
has served as a member of our board of directors since March 2018. He is the founder of Carpet South Design Inc., where he has
served as its CEO since 2013. He also owns a majority interest in Piedmont Stair Works Design LLC. The operations of both of these
companies target the real estate improvements industry. Mr. Johnson earned his B.S. degree in Business Management from the University
of Phoenix. Mr. Johnson was selected to serve on our board of directors due to experience in the real estate industry.

William H. Carter. Mr. Carter
has served as a member of our board of directors since March 2018. He has served as president of The Carter Land Company for the
past 15 years. The Carter Land Company has provided brokerage services with respect to 144 manufactured housing communities in
the Southeast. The firm presently manages apartments, single family houses, commercial warehouses, mobile home parks, self-storage
facilities and retail buildings. Mr. Carter was selected to serve on our board of directors due to his experience in our industry.

Directors and executive officers are elected
until their successors are duly elected and qualified. There are no arrangements or understandings known to us pursuant to which
any director or executive officer was or is to be selected as a director (or director nominee) or executive officer.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between
any of our directors or executive officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, except as
described below, none of our directors or executive officers has, during the past ten years:

●

been convicted in a criminal proceeding or been subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding
traffic violations and other minor offences);

●

had any bankruptcy petition filed by or against the business or property of the person, or of any
partnership, corporation or business association of which he was a general partner or executive officer, either at the time of
the bankruptcy filing or within two years prior to that time;

28

●

been subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated,
of any court of competent jurisdiction or federal or state authority, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending
or otherwise limiting, his involvement in any type of business, securities, futures, commodities, investment, banking, savings
and loan, or insurance activities, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

●

been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Securities and Exchange
Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the
judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated;

●

been the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment,
decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated (not including any settlement of a civil proceeding among private
litigants), relating to an alleged violation of any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation, any law or regulation
respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order
of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition
order, or any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

●

been the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended
or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any
registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange,
association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Corporate Governance

Our current board of directors is comprised
of five members: Raymond M. Gee, Michael Z. Anise, Terry Robertson, James L. Johnson and William H. Carter. Our board of directors
has determined that Messrs. Robertson, Johnson and Carter are independent directors as that term is defined in the rules of the
Nasdaq Stock Market.

Our board of directors currently has two
standing committees, an audit committee and a compensation committee, which perform various duties on behalf of and report to the
board of directors. Each of the standing committees is comprised of a majority of independent directors. From time to time, the
board of directors may establish other committees.

Governance Structure

Currently, our chief executive officer
is also our chairman. Our board of directors believes that, at this time, having a combined chief executive officer and chairman
is the appropriate leadership structure for our company. In making this determination, the board of directors considered, among
other matters, Mr. Gee’s experience and tenure, and believed that Mr. Gee is highly qualified to act as both chairman and
chief executive officer due to his experience, knowledge, and personality. Among the benefits of a combined chief executive officer/chairman
considered by the board of directors is that such structure promotes clearer leadership and direction for our company and allows
for a single, focused chain of command to execute our strategic initiatives and business plans.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Our board of directors plays an active
role, as a whole and also at the committee level, in overseeing management of our risks and strategic direction. Our board of directors
regularly reviews information regarding our liquidity and operations, as well as the risks associated with each. Our audit committee
oversees the process by which our senior management and relevant employees assess and manage our exposure to, and management of,
financial risks. Our compensation committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to our executive compensation
plans and arrangements. While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such
risks, the entire board of directors is regularly informed about such risks.

Audit Committee

Our audit committee currently consists
of Messrs. Robertson, Anise and Carter, with Mr. Robertson serving as chairman. Our board of directors has determined that each
member of our audit committee is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements and has substantial business experience
that results in such member’s financial sophistication. Our board of directors further determined that Mr. Robertson possesses
the accounting or related financial management experience that qualifies him as financially sophisticated within the meaning of
the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market and that he is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules and
regulations of the SEC.

29

The primary purposes of our audit committee
are to assist our board of directors in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee the accounting and financial reporting processes
of our company and audits of our financial statements, including (i) retaining and overseeing our independent accountants; (ii)
assisting the board in its oversight of the integrity of our financial statements, the qualifications, independence and performance
of our independent auditors and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (iii) reviewing and approving the plan and
scope of the internal and external audit; (iv) pre-approving any audit and non-audit services provided by our independent auditors;
(v) approving the fees to be paid to our independent auditors; (vi) reviewing with our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer and independent auditors the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal controls; (vii) preparing the audit committee report
to be filed with the SEC; (viii) reviewing hedging transactions; and (ix) reviewing and assessing annually the audit committee’s
performance and the adequacy of its charter. The role and responsibilities of our audit committee are more fully set forth in a
written charter adopted by our board of directors, which is available on our website at www.mhproperties.com.

Compensation Committee

Our compensation committee currently consists
of Messrs. Johnson, Robertson and Gee, with Mr. Johnson serving as chairman. The primary purposes of our compensation committee
are to assist our board of directors in fulfilling its responsibility to determine the compensation of our executive officers and
directors and to approve and evaluate the compensation policies and programs of our company, including (i) reviewing from time
to time and approving our corporate goals and objectives relevant to compensation and our executive compensation structure and
compensation range; (ii) evaluating the chief executive officer’s performance in light of the goals and objectives and determining
and approving the chief executive officer’s compensation based on this evaluation; (iii) determining and approving the compensation
paid to our chief financial officer and any other executive officers; (iv) determining the compensation of our independent directors;
(v) granting rights to indemnification and reimbursement of expenses to any officers, employees or directors; (vi) making recommendations
to the board regarding equity-based and incentive compensation plans, policies and programs; and (vii) reviewing and assessing
annually the compensation committee’s performance and the adequacy of its charter. The role and responsibilities of our compensation
committee are more fully set forth in a written charter adopted by our board of directors, which is available on our website at
www.mhproperties.com.

The policies underlying our compensation
committee’s compensation decisions are designed to attract and retain the best-qualified management personnel available.
We routinely compensate our executive officers through salaries. At our discretion, we may reward executive officers and employees
through bonus programs based on profitability and other objectively measurable performance factors. Additionally, we use stock
options and other incentive awards to compensate our executives and other key employees to align the interests of our executive
officers with the interests of our stockholders. In establishing executive compensation, our compensation committee will evaluate
compensation paid to similar officers employed at other companies of similar size in the same industry and the individual performance
of each officer as it impacts our overall performance with particular focus on an individual’s contribution to the realization
of operating profits and the achievement of strategic business goals. Our compensation committee will further attempt to rationalize
a particular executive’s compensation with that of other executive officers of our company in an effort to distribute compensation
fairly among the executive officers. Although the components of executive compensation (salary, bonus and incentive grants) will
be reviewed separately, compensation decisions will be made based on a review of total compensation.

Material Changes to Director Nomination
Procedures

There have been no material changes to
the procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to our board of directors since such procedures were last disclosed.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies
to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal
accounting officer. Such code of ethics addresses, among other things, honesty and ethical conduct, conflicts of interest, compliance
with laws, regulations and policies, including disclosure requirements under the federal securities laws, and reporting of violations
of the code.

We are required to disclose any amendment
to, or waiver from, a provision of our code of ethics applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer,
principal accounting officer, controller, or persons performing similar functions. We intend to use our website as a method of
disseminating this disclosure, as permitted by applicable SEC rules. Any such disclosure will be posted to our website within four
business days following the date of any such amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our code of ethics.

30

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires
our directors and executive officers and beneficial holders of more than 10% of our Common Stock to file with the SEC initial reports
of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our equity securities. We believe, based solely on a review of the copies of
such reports furnished to us and representations of these persons, that the following reports were not timely filed for the year
ended December 31, 2019:

●

each of our directors was awarded 10,000 shares of Common Stock during 2019, which were not reported;
and

●

certain transactions by Metrolina were not reported.

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Summary Compensation Table – Years
Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

The following table sets forth information
concerning all cash and non-cash compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the named persons for services rendered in all capacities
during the noted periods. No other executive officers received total annual salary and bonus compensation in excess of $100,000.

Name and Principal Position

Year

Salary

($)

Option Awards

($)(1)

Stock Awards

($)(1)

Total

($)

Raymond M. Gee, Chief Executive Officer

2019

-

-

2,700

2,700

2018

-

-

-

Michael Z. Anise, Chief Financial Officer

2019

150,000

5,230

2,700

157,930

2018

130,000

37

-

130,037

Adam A. Martin, Chief Investment Officer

2019

130,000

-

-

130,000

2018

150,000

38

-

150,038

(1)

The amount is equal to the aggregate grant-date fair value with respect to the awards, computed
in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal
Year End

The following table includes certain information
with respect to the value of all unexercised options and unvested shares of restricted stock previously awarded to the executive
officers named above at the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

During the fourth quarter of 2019, we awarded 10,000
shares of Common Stock to each of our directors under our Stock Compensation Plan. These shares vested in full on the date of
issuance. The amount is equal to the aggregate grant-date fair value with respect to the awards, computed in accordance with FASB
ASC Topic 718.

The following table sets forth information
regarding beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of April 10, 2020 by (i) each of our officers and directors; (ii) all of
our officers and directors as a group; and (iii) each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our Common
Stock. Unless otherwise specified, the address of each of the persons set forth below is in care of our company, 136 Main Street,
Pineville, NC 28134.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Title of Class

Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1)

Percent of Class(2)

Raymond M. Gee, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (3)

Common Stock

8,665,000

70.21

%

Michael Z. Anise, President, Chief Financial Officer and Director (4)

Common Stock

288,333

2.29

%

Andrew Coatley, Chief Operating Officer (5)

Common Stock

20,000

*

Adam A. Martin, Chief Investment Officer (6)

Common Stock

240,000

1.91

%

Terry Robertson, Director

Common Stock

20,000

*

James L. Johnson, Director

Common Stock

20,000

*

William H. Carter, Director

Common Stock

20,000

*

All officers and directors as a group (7 persons named above)

Common Stock

9,268,333

75.05

%

Michael P. Kelly (7)

Common Stock

2,000,000

16.20

%

Joseph Jackson (8)

Common Stock

1,254,506

10.16

%

*

Less than 1%

(1)

Beneficial Ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes
voting or investment power with respect to securities. The person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any security of which
that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Except as set forth below, each of the beneficial owners
listed above has direct ownership of and sole voting power and investment power with respect to the shares of our Common Stock.

(2)

A total of 12,341,980 shares of our Common stock are considered to be outstanding pursuant to SEC
Rule 13d-3(d)(1) as of April 10, 2020. For each beneficial owner above, any options exercisable within 60 days have been included
in the denominator.

32

(3)

Includes 20,000 shares of Common Stock held directly and 8,645,000 shares of Common Stock held
by Gvest Real Estate Capital LLC. Raymond M. Gee is the Managing Member of Gvest Real Estate Capital LLC and has voting and investment
control over the shares held by it.

(4)

Includes 20,000 shares of Common Stock held directly and 268,333 shares of Common Stock which Mr.
Anise has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of vested options.

(5)

Consists of 20,000 shares of Common Stock which Mr. Coatley has the right to acquire within 60
days through the exercise of vested options.

(6)

Consists of 240,000 shares of Common Stock which Mr. Martin has the right to acquire within 60
days through the exercise of vested options.

(7)

Represents shares held by The Raymond M Gee Irrevocable Trust. Michael P. Kelly is the Trustee
of The Raymond M Gee Irrevocable Trust and has voting and investment control over the shares held by it.

(8)

Represents shares held by Metrolina Loan Holdings, LLC. Joseph Jackson is the Managing Member of
Metrolina Loan Holdings, LLC and has voting and investment control over the shares held by it. The address of Metrolina Loan
Holdings, LLC is 108 Gateway Blvd, Suite 104, Mooresville, NC 28117.

Changes in Control

We do not currently have any arrangements
which if consummated may result in a change of control of our company.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth certain
information about the securities authorized for issuance under our incentive plans as of December 31, 2019.

Plan Category

Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights

Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))

(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

565,175

$

0.03

165,500

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

-

-

-

Total

565,175

$

0.03

165,500

In December 2017, our board of directors,
with the approval of a majority of stockholders, adopted a Stock Compensation Plan. The Stock Compensation Plan provides for grants
of stock options and other forms of incentive compensation to officers, employees, directors, advisors or consultants of our company
or its subsidiaries. We are authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock under this plan.

The following includes a summary of transactions
since the beginning of our 2018 fiscal year, or any currently proposed transaction, in which we were or are to be a participant
and the amount involved exceeded or exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year end
for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest
(other than compensation described under “Item 11. Executive Compensation”). We believe the terms obtained or consideration
that we paid or received, as applicable, in connection with the transactions described below were comparable to terms available
or the amounts that would be paid or received, as applicable, in arm’s-length transactions.

33

●

On October 1, 2017, we issued a revolving promissory note to Raymond M. Gee, our chairman and chief
executive officer, pursuant to which we may borrow up to $1,500,000 from Mr. Gee on a revolving basis for working capital purposes.
This note has a five-year term with no annual interest and principal payment is deferred until the maturity date. As of December
31, 2019, the amount owed by us to Mr. Gee under this note is $797,906, with $87,577 of imputed interest and $83,206 of payments
have been made by us since the date we issued this note to Mr. Gee.

●

On May 8, 2017, we issued a promissory note to Metrolina in the principal amount of $3,000,000.
The note is interest only payment based on 8%, and 10% deferred until maturity to be paid with principal balance. The note originally
awarded Metrolina 455,000 shares of Common Stock as consideration, which resulted in making Metrolina a related party due to its
significant ownership. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we paid off the entire balance on the note of $2,754,550 plus interest
and amended the agreement to allow for the redeployment of the $3,000,000 available, eliminated the conversion option whereby Metrolina
could convert the ratio of total outstanding debt at time of exercise of the option into an amount of newly issued shares of our
Common Stock determined by dividing the outstanding indebtedness by $3,000,000 multiplied by 10% with a cap of 864,500 shares.
The amendment resulted in issuing an additional 545,000 shares with a fair value of $305,200 for a total of 1,000,000 shares awarded
to Metrolina. The note gives Metrolina the right and option to purchase its pro rata share of debt or equity securities issued
to maintain up to 10% equity interest in our company at the most recent price of any equity transaction for seven years from the
amendment dated February 26, 2019. As of December 31, 2019, the balance on this note was $1,730,000. The party note is guaranteed
by Mr. Gee.

●

In January 2019, we executed an agreement to acquire the 25% minority interest in Pecan Grove and
issued 2,000,000 shares of our Common Stock to Gvest Real Estate Capital LLC, an entity controlled by Mr. Gee, for the minority
interest acquisition, which were valued at the historical cost value of $537,562.

●

During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we recorded $48,319 and $4,000, respectively
in revenues related to property management consulting services provided to Gvest Real Estate Capital LLC.

●

During the year ended December 31, 2019, Mr. Gee received a $50,000 fee for his personal guarantee
on a promissory note relating to a loan for one of our acquisitions. The fee was recorded as a loan cost and is amortized over
the five year life of the loan.

●

On April 1, 2020, Mr. Gee received a $70,000 fee for his personal
guarantee on the new promissory note issued by Butternut MHP Land LLC in connection with the refinancing of that loan. The fee
was recorded as a loan cost and is amortized over the five year life of the loan.

●

During the year ended December 31, 2019 we entered into an office lease agreement with Gvest Real
Estate Capital LLC for the lease of our offices. The lease is $4,000 per month and is on a month-to-month term. During 2019, we
paid $16,000 of rent expense to Gvest Real Estate Capital LLC.

Parent Company

As of April 10, 2020, Gvest Real Estate
Capital LLC holds approximately 70% of our issued and outstanding voting securities.

Director Independence

Our board of directors has determined that
Terry Robertson, James L. Johnson and William H. Carter are independent directors as that term is defined in the applicable rules
of the Nasdaq Stock Market.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

Independent Auditors’ Fees

The following is a summary of the fees
billed to us for professional services rendered for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

Year Ended December 31,

2019

2018

Audit Fees

$

62,600

$

37,025

Audit-Related Fees

45,000

-

Tax Fees

3,000

3,500

All Other Fees

-

-

TOTAL

$

110,600

$

40,525

34

“Audit Fees” consisted of fees
billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements and review
of the financial statements included in our Form 10-K and 10-Q or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection
with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

“Audit-Related Fees” consisted
of fees billed for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that were reasonably related to the performance of
the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under the paragraph captioned “Audit Fees” above.

“Tax Fees” consisted of fees
billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax returns preparation.

“All Other Fees” consisted
of fees billed for products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported above under other
captions of this Item 14.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, all
audit and non-audit services performed by our auditors must be approved in advance by our board of directors to assure that such
services do not impair the auditors’ independence from us. In accordance with its policies and procedures, our board of directors
pre-approved the audit service performed by Liggett & Webb, P.A. for our financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2019.

We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Manufactured Housing Properties Inc. (the “Company”)
as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit)
and cash flows for each of the two years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related notes. In our opinion, the consolidated
financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and
2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis
for Opinion

These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered
with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with
respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities
and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether
due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal controls
over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our
audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether
due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis,
evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Manufactured
Housing Properties Inc. (the “Company”) is a Nevada corporation whose principal activities are to acquire, own, and
operate manufactured housing communities. Mobile Home Rental Holdings (“MHRH”) was formed in April 2016 to acquire
the assets for Pecan Grove MHP in November 2016 and Butternut MHP in April 2017. To continue the acquisition and aggregation of
mobile home parks, MHRH intend to raise capital in the public markets. Therefore, on October 21, 2017, MHRH was acquired by and
merged with a public entity Stack-it Storage, Inc. (OTC: STAK). As part of the merger transaction, Stack-it Storage, Inc. changed
its name to Manufactured Housing Properties Inc. (OTC: MHPC).

For
accounting purposes, this transaction was accounted for as a reverse merger and has been treated as a recapitalization of Stack-it
Storage, Inc. with Manufactured Housing Properties Inc. as the accounting acquirer.

Basis
of Presentation

The
Company prepares its consolidated financial statements present the balance sheets, statements of operations. changes in stockholder's
deficit and cash flows of the Company under the accrual basis of accounting, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

Principle
of Consolidation

The
accompanying financial statements are presented on a consolidated basis the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries.
All intercompany balances have been eliminated upon consolidation.

The
Company’s subsidiaries are all formed as limited liability companies. The acquisition and date of consolidation are as follows:

Name
of Subsidiary

State
of Formation

Date
of Consolidation

Ownership

Pecan
Grove MHP LLC

North
Carolina

October
12, 2016*

100%*

Butternut
MHP Land LLC

Delaware

March
1, 2017

100%

Azalea
MHP LLC

North
Carolina

October
25, 2017

100%

Holly
Faye MHP LLC

North
Carolina

October
25, 2017

100%

Chatham
Pines MHP LLC

North
Carolina

October
31, 2017

100%

Maple
Hills MHP LLC

North
Carolina

October
31, 2017

100%

Lakeview
MHP LLC

South
Carolina

November
1, 2017

100%

MHP
Pursuits LLC

North
Carolina

January
31, 2019

100%

Mobile
Home Rentals LLC

North
Carolina

September
30, 2016

100%

Hunt
Club MHP LLC

South
Carolina

March
8, 2019

100%

B&D
MHP LLC

South
Carolina

April
4, 2019

100%

Crestview
MHP LLC

North
Carolina

June
28, 2019

100%

Springlake
MHP LLC

Georgia

October
10, 2019

100%

ARC
MHP LLC

South
Carolina

November
13, 2019

100%

*

The
Company originally acquired a 75% interest. In January 2019, the Company acquired the remaining 25% interest from a related party.

All
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company does not have a majority or minority
interest in any other company, either consolidated or unconsolidated.

F-7

Revenue
Recognition

The
Company follows Topic 606 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) for revenue recognition and Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09. On January 1, 2018, the
Company adopted ASU 2014-09, which is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires revenue to be recognized in
a manner to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be
received in exchange for those goods or services. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all the
five following criteria are met: (1) identification of the contract with a customer, (2) identification of the performance obligations
in the contract, (3) determination of the transaction price, (4) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations
in the contract, and (5) recognition of revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies a performance obligation. Results for reporting
periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under ASU 2014-09, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue
to be reported under the previous accounting standards. There was no impact to revenues as a result of applying ASU 2014-09 for
the year ended December 31, 2019, and there have not been any significant changes to the Company’s business processes, systems,
or internal controls as a result of implementing the standard.

Acquisitions

The
Company accounts for acquisitions in accordance with ASC 805, “Business Combinations,” and allocates the purchase
price of the property based upon the fair value of the assets acquired, which generally consist of land, site and land improvements,
buildings and improvements and rental homes. The Company allocates the purchase price of an acquired property generally determined
by internal evaluation as well as third-party appraisal of the property obtained in conjunction with the purchase.

Investment
Property and Equipment and Depreciation

Property
and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation for sites and building is computed principally on the straight-line method over
the estimated useful lives of the assets (ranging from 15 to 25 years). Depreciation of improvements to sites and buildings, rental
homes and equipment and vehicles is computed principally on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets
(ranging from 3 to 25 years). Land development costs are not depreciated until they are put in use, at which time they are capitalized
as sites and land improvements. Interest expense pertaining to land development costs are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs
are charged to expense as incurred and improvements are capitalized. The costs and related accumulated depreciation of property
sold or otherwise disposed of are removed from the financial statement and any gain or loss is reflected in the current year’s
results of operations.

Impairment
Policy

The
Company applies FASB ASC 360-10, “Property, Plant & Equipment,” to measure impairment in real estate investments.
Rental properties are individually evaluated for impairment when conditions exist which may indicate that it is probable that
the sum of expected future cash flows (on an undiscounted basis without interest) from a rental property is less than the carrying
value under its historical net cost basis. These expected future cash flows consider factors such as future operating income,
trends and prospects as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. Upon determination that a permanent
impairment has occurred, rental properties are reduced to their fair value. For properties to be disposed of, an impairment loss
is recognized when the fair value of the property, less the estimated cost to sell, is less than the carrying amount of the property
measured at the time there is a commitment to sell the property and/or it is actively being marketed for sale. A property to be
disposed of is reported at the lower of its carrying amount or its estimated fair value, less its cost to sell. Subsequent to
the date that a property is held for disposition, depreciation expense is not recorded.

Stock-Based
Compensation

All
stock based payments to employees, nonemployee consultants, and to nonemployee directors for their services as directors, including
any grants of restricted stock and stock options, are measured at fair value on the grant date and recognized in the statements
of operations as compensation or other expense over the relevant service period in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Stock based
payments to nonemployees are recognized as an expense over the period of performance. Such payments are measured at fair value
at the earlier of the date a performance commitment is reached or the date performance is completed. In addition, for awards that
vest immediately and are nonforfeitable the measurement date is the date the award is issued. The Company recorded stock option
expense of $4,774 and $69 during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Fair
Value of Financial Instruments

The
Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB ASC for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph
820-10-35-37 of the FASB ASC to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework
for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability
in fair value measurements and related disclosures, paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes
the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority
to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.

F-8

Net
Loss per Share

Basic and diluted loss per
share amounts are computed based on net loss divided the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the weighted
average number of net shares that would be issued upon exercise of stock options pursuant to the treasury stock method. Total
dilutive securities outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 total totaled 2,299,722 and 0 convertible shares, respectively,
and options of 659,175 and 541,334, respectively, which were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share because
the assumed conversion and exercise would be anti-dilutive for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Management
Estimates

The presentation of financial
statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reported period . Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain
2018 balances have been reclassified in the 2019 financial statement presentation. The reclassification of loan costs did not
have any effects on the financial statements.

Cash
and Cash Equivalents

For
purposes of these financial statements, cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid debt instruments with maturity of less
than three months.

Concentrations
of Credit Risk

Financial
instruments and related items, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash
and cash equivalents. The Company places its cash and temporary cash investments with high credit quality institutions. At times,
such investments may be in excess of the FDIC insurance limit. Currently our operating accounts are approximately $2,553,454 above
the FDIC limit.

Recent
Accounting Pronouncements

In
June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit
Losses on Financial Instruments.” ASU 2016-13 requires that entities use a new forward looking “expected loss”
model that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowance for credit losses. The measurement of expected credit
losses is based upon historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability
of the reported amount. ASU No. 2016-13 is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within
those periods, beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have
on the consolidated financial statements.

In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases.” ASU 2016-02 amends the existing accounting standards for lease
accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor
accounting. The standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after,
the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has evaluated the impact this standard had
on the consolidated financial statements and determined that it had no impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In
June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07 “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee
Share-Based Payment Accounting.” This ASU relates to the accounting for non-employee share-based payments. The amendment
in this ASU expands the scope of Topic 718 to include all share-based payment transactions in which a grantor acquired goods or
services to be used or consumed in a grantor’s own operations by issuing share-based payment awards. The ASU excludes share-based
payment awards that relate to (1) financing to the issuer or (2) awards granted in conjunction with selling goods or services
to customers as part of a contract accounted for under Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts from Customers. The share-based payments
are to be measured at grant-date fair value of the equity instruments that the entity is obligated to issue when the good or service
has been delivered or rendered and all other conditions necessary to earn the right to benefit from the equity instruments have
been satisfied. This standard will be effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018,
including interim periods within that fiscal year. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted,
but no earlier than an entity’s adoption of Topic 606. The Company has evaluated the impact this standard had on the consolidated
financial statements and determined that it had no impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Management
does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material
effect on the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

F-9

NOTE
2 – FIXED ASSETS

The
following table summarizes the Company's property and equipment balances are generally used to depreciate the assets on a straight-line
basis:

Fixed Assets

2019

2018

Investment Property

Land

$

11,130,259

$

4,357,950

Site and Land Improvements

17,466,801

6,781,845

Buildings and Improvements

6,214,725

1,441,222

Total Investment Property

34,811,785

12,581,017

Accumulated Depreciation & Amortization

(1,394,958

)

(699,184

)

Net Investment Property

$

33,358,019

$

11,881,833

Depreciation
and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were $738,789 and $534,290, respectively. Total additional
fixed assets during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were $22,022,684 and $231,247, respectively.

NOTE
3 – ACQUISITIONS

During
the fourth quarter 2016, the Company acquired the assets of its first manufactured housing community containing 81 home sites.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the company acquired the assets of six manufactured housing communities containing approximately
360 home sites. The Company had five additional acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2019. These were asset acquisitions
from third parties and have been accounted for as asset acquisitions. The acquisition date estimated fair value was determined
by third party appraisals. The acquisition of the manufactured housing communities acquired assets consisted of the following:

Acquisition Date

Name

Land

Improvements

Building

Total
Purchase Price

November 2016

Pecan Grove MHP

$

1,583,071

$

432,501

$

20,463

$

2,036,035

April 2017

Butternut MHP

85,000

1,130,527

431,618

1,647,145

November 2017

Azalea MHP

149,200

559,936

114,959

824,095

November 2017

Holly Faye MHP

160,000

553,273

3,700

716,973

November 2017

Chatham MHP

940,000

965,900

2,000

1,907,900

November 2017

Lakeview MHP

520,000

1,226,256

53,564

1,799,820

December 2017

Maple Hills MHP

1,165,000

1,943,710

843,885

3,952,595

April 2019

Hunt Club MHP

1,394,275

589,500

3,886

1,987,661

May 2019

B&D MHP

1,750,000

914,061

-

2,664,061

August 2019

Crestview MHP

991,750

2,975,250

1,533,000

5,500,000

November 2019

Springlake MHP

923,213

2,769,637

1,582,650

5,275,500

December 2019

ARC MHP

1,468,750

3,406,250

1,625,000

6,500,000

$

11,130,259

$

17,466,801

$

6,214,725

$

34,811,785

F-10

Pro-forma
Financial Information (unaudited)

The
following unaudited pro-forma information presents the combined results of operations for the periods as if the above acquisitions
of manufactured housing communities had been completed on January 1, 2018.

For the Years Ended December
31,

2019

2018

Total Revenue

$

5,039,009

$

4,965,466

Total Expenses

5,830,724

4,641,410

Depreciation & Amortization

1,476,322

1,701,436

Interest Expense

1,850,999

1,866,883

Preferred Stock Dividends / Accretion

360,937

-

Net Income (Loss)

$

(4,479,973

)

$

(3,244,263

)

Net Loss Per Share

$

(0.35

)

$

(0.32

)

NOTE
4 – PROMISSORY NOTES

Secured
Promissory Notes

The
Company has issued promissory notes payable to lenders related to the acquisition of its manufactured housing communities. These
promissory notes range from 4.5% to 7.0% with 20 to 25 years principal amortization. Two of the promissory notes had an initial
6 months period on interest only payments. The promissory notes are secured by the real estate assets and $6,344,894 for three
assets were guaranteed by Raymond M. Gee, the Company’s chairman, chief executive officer and owner of the principal stockholder
of the Company.

During
the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company refinanced a total of $4,940,750 from current loans payable to $8,241,000 of new
notes payable from five of the communities, resulting in an additional loan payable of $3,320,859. The Company used the additional
loans payable proceeds from the refinance to retire the related party note payable described below. As of December 31, 2019, the
Company wrote off mortgage costs of $68,280 and capitalized $608,541 of mortgage costs due to the refinancing. As of December
31, 2019, the outstanding balance on these notes was $8,134,996. The following are terms of these notes:

Maturity
Date

Interest
Rate

Balance
12/31/19

Balance
12/31/18

Butternut MHP Land LLC (see Note 9)

03/30/20

6.500

%

$

1,114,819

$

1,134,971

Butternut MHP Land LLC Mezz (see Note 9)

04/01/27

7.000

%

280,013

287,086

Pecan Grove MHP LLC

11/04/26

4.500

%

3,095,274

1,270,577

Azalea MHP LLC

11/10/27

5.000

%

835,445

598,571

Holly Faye MHP LLC

10/01/38

4.000

%

574,096

462,328

Chatham MHP LLC

12/01/22

5.125

%

1,771,506

1,366,753

Lakeview MHP LLC

12/01/22

5.125

%

1,857,266

1,222,521

B&D MHP LLC

05/02/29

5.500

%

1,854,788

-

Hunt Club MHP LLC

05/01/24

5.750

%

1,447,364

-

Crestview MHP LLC

08/01/24

5.500

%

4,173,652

-

Springlake MHP LLC

11/14/22

4.500

%

4,000,000

-

ARC MHP LLC

01/01/30

5.500

%

5,300,000

-

Maple Hills MHP LLC

01/01/23

5.125

%

2,688,653

2,743,303

Totals note payables

28,992,876

9,086,100

Discount Direct Lender Fees

(692,454

)

(140,758

)

Total net of Discount

$

28,359,247

$

8,945,352

Related
Party Promissory Note

On
May 8, 2017, the Company issued a promissory note to Metrolina Loan Holdings, LLC (“Metrolina”) in the principal amount
of $3,000,000. The note is interest only payment based on 8%, and 10% deferred until maturity to be paid with principal balance.
The note originally awarded Metrolina 455,000 shares of Common Stock as consideration, which resulted in making Metrolina a related
party due to its significant ownership. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company paid off the entire balance on the
note of $2,754,550 plus interest and amended the agreement to allow for the redeployment of the $3,000,000 available, eliminated
the conversion option whereby Metrolina could convert the ratio of total outstanding debt at time of exercise of the option into
an amount of newly issued shares of the Company’s Common Stock determined by dividing the outstanding indebtedness by $3,000,000
multiplied by 10% with a cap of 864,500 shares. The amendment resulted in issuing an additional 545,000 shares with a fair value
of $305,200 for a total of 1,000,000 shares awarded to Metrolina. The note gives Metrolina the right and option to purchase its
pro rata share of debt or equity securities issued to maintain up to 10% equity interest in the Company at the most recent price
of any equity transaction for seven years from the amendment dated February 26, 2019. As of December 31, 2019, the balance on
this note was $1,730,000. The related party note is guaranteed by Mr. Gee.

F-11

Revolving
Promissory Note

On
October 1, 2017, the Company issued a revolving promissory note to Raymond M. Gee, the Company’s chairman and chief executive
officer, pursuant to which the Company may borrow up to $1,500,000 from Mr. Gee on a revolving basis for working capital purposes.
This note has a five-year term with no annual interest and principal payment is deferred until the maturity date. As of December
31, 2019, the outstanding balance on this note was $797,906. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded
imputed interest related to the note of $87,577 and $44,695, respectively.

Maturities
of Long-Term Obligations for Five Years and Beyond

The
minimum annual principal payments of notes payable at December 31, 2019 were:

2020

$

480,907

2021

2,254,163

2022

5,329,658

2023

2,996,492

2024 and Thereafter

20,459,561

Total minimum principal payments

$

31,520,781

NOTE
5 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

From
time to time, the Company may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of
business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise
that may harm its business. The Company is currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that they believe will
have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or operating results.

NOTE
6 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred
Stock

The
Company is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value.

Series
A Preferred Stock

On
May 8, 2019, the Company filed a certificate of designation with the Nevada Secretary of State pursuant to which the Company designated
4,000,000 shares of its preferred stock as Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”).
The Series A Preferred Stock has the following voting powers, designations, preferences and relative rights, qualifications, limitations
or restrictions:

Ranking.
The Series A Preferred Stock ranks, as to dividend rights and rights upon our liquidation, dissolution, or winding up, senior
to the Common Stock.

Dividend
Rate and Payment Dates. Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock are cumulative and payable monthly in arrears to all
holders of record on the applicable record date. Holders of Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive cumulative dividends
in the amount of $0.017 per share each month, which is equivalent to the rate of 8% of the $2.50 liquidation preference per share.
Dividends on shares of Series A Preferred Stock will continue to accrue even if any of the Company’s agreements prohibit
the current payment of dividends or the Company does not have earnings. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company paid
dividends of $125,700.

Liquidation
Preference. The liquidation preference for each share of Series A Preferred Stock is $2.50. Upon a liquidation, dissolution
or winding up of the Company, holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive the liquidation preference
with respect to their shares plus an amount equal to any accrued but unpaid dividends (whether or not declared) to, but not including,
the date of payment with respect to such shares.

F-12

Stockholder
Optional Conversion. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, at any time and from time to time, at the
option of the holder thereof and without the payment of additional consideration, into that number of shares of Common Stock determined
by dividing the liquidation preference of such share by the conversion price then in effect. The conversion price is initially
equal $2.50, subject to adjustment as set forth in the certificate of designation. In addition, if at any time the trading price
of the Common Stock is greater than the liquidation preference of $2.50, the Company may deliver a written notice to all holders
to cause each holder to convert all or part of such holders’ Series A Preferred Stock.

Company
Call and Stockholder Put Options. Commencing on the fifth anniversary of the initial issuance of shares of Series A Preferred
Stock and continuing indefinitely thereafter, the Company will have a right to call for redemption the outstanding shares of Series
A Preferred Stock at a call price equal to $3.75, or 150% of the original issue price of the Series A Preferred Stock, and correspondingly,
each holder of shares of Series A Preferred Stock shall have a right to put the shares of Series A Preferred Stock held by such
holder back to us at a put price equal to $3.75, or 150% of the original issue purchase price of such shares. During the year
ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded a put option cost of $184,000.

Voting
Rights. The Company may not authorize or issue any class or series of equity securities ranking senior to the Series A
Preferred Stock as to dividends or distributions upon liquidation (including securities convertible into or exchangeable for any
such senior securities) or amend the Company’s articles of incorporation (whether by merger, consolidation, or otherwise)
to materially and adversely change the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock without the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds
of the votes entitled to be cast on such matter by holders of the outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock, voting together
as a class. Otherwise, holders of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock do not have any voting rights.

As of December 31, 2019, that Company has
issued 1,890,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for a total of $4,725,000 in cash. As of December 31, 2019, the Series A Preferred
stock balance was made up of Series A Preferred Stock totaling $4,725,000 and Accretion of put options totaling $184,000.

Series
B Preferred Stock

On
December 2, 2019, the Company filed a certificate of designation with the Nevada Secretary of State pursuant to which the Company
designated 1,000,000 shares of its preferred stock as Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred
Stock”). The Series B Preferred Stock has the following voting powers, designations, preferences and relative rights, qualifications,
limitations or restrictions:

Ranking.
The Series B Preferred Stock rank, as to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution, or winding up, senior to the
Common Stock and pari passu with the Series A Preferred Stock.

Dividend
Rate and Payment Dates. Dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock are cumulative and payable monthly in arrears to all
holders of record on the applicable record date. Holders of Series B Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive cumulative dividends
in the amount of $0.067 per share each month, which is equivalent to the annual rate of 8% of the $10.00 liquidation preference
per share; provided that upon an event of default (generally defined as the Company’s failure to pay dividends when due
or to redeem shares when requested by a holder), such amount shall be increased to $0.083 per month, which is equivalent to the
annual rate of 10% of the $10.00 liquidation preference per share. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company paid dividends
of $23,233.

Liquidation
Preference. The liquidation preference for each share of Series B Preferred Stock is $10.00. Upon a liquidation, dissolution
or winding up of the Company, holders of shares of Series B Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive the liquidation preference
with respect to their shares plus an amount equal to any accrued but unpaid dividends (whether or not declared) to, but not including,
the date of payment with respect to such shares.

Company
Call and Stockholder Put Options. Commencing on the fifth anniversary of the initial issuance of shares of Series B Preferred
Stock and continuing indefinitely thereafter, the Company will have a right to call for redemption the outstanding shares of Series
B Preferred Stock at a call price equal to $15.00, or 150% of the original issue price of the Series B Preferred Stock, and correspondingly,
each holder of shares of Series B Preferred Stock shall have a right to put the shares of Series B Preferred Stock held by such
holder back to the Company at a put price equal to $15.00, or 150% of the original issue purchase price of such shares. During
the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded a put option cost of $28,004.

Voting
Rights. The Company may not authorize or issue any class or series of equity securities ranking senior to the Series B
Preferred Stock as to dividends or distributions upon liquidation (including securities convertible into or exchangeable for any
such senior securities) or amend the Company’s articles of incorporation (whether by merger, consolidation, or otherwise)
to materially and adversely change the terms of the Series B Preferred Stock without the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds
of the votes entitled to be cast on such matter by holders of outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock, voting together
as a class. Otherwise, holders of the shares of Series B Preferred Stock do not have any voting rights.

F-13

No
Conversion Right. The Series B Preferred Stock is not convertible into shares of Common Stock.

On
November 1, 2019, the Company launched an offering under Regulation A of Section 3(6) of the Securities Act of 1933, as, amended,
for Tier 2 offerings, pursuant to which the Company is offering up to 1,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock at an offering
price of $10.00 per share, for a maximum offering amount of $10,000,000. In addition, the Company is offering bonus shares to
early investors in this offering, whereby the first 400 investors will receive, in addition to Series B Preferred Stock, 100 shares
of Common Stock, regardless of the amount invested, for a total of 40,000 shares of Common Stock. As of December 31, 2019 there
were 15,400 shares of Common Stock issued with a fair value of $4,158.

As
of December 31, 2019, the Company sold an aggregate of 409,722 shares of Series B Preferred Stock for total gross proceeds of
$4,097,220. After deducting a placement fee and other expenses, the Company received net proceeds of $3,945,606.

Common
Stock

The
Company is authorized to issue up to 200,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share. As of December 31, 2019, there
were 12,336,080 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.

The Company repurchased and retired 553,888
shares of Common Stock for $57,500 during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019.

(A) Stock
issued for Service

In
November 2018, the Company issued 350,000 shares of Common Stock for services to an investment bank for advisory services with
a fair value of $171,500, and $24,500 of that fair value was expensed during the three months ended March 31, 2019. During year
ended December 31, 2019, the Company purchased these shares back into treasury for a total of $61,837 due to the termination of
the advisory service agreement with the investment bank.

In
February 2019, the Company issued an additional 545,000 shares of Common Stock for services to Metrolina with a fair value of
$305,200.

In
November 2019, the Company issued 50,000 shares of Common Stock to board members with a value of $13,500.

In
October 2019, the Company issued 25,000 shares of Common Stock for consulting services with a value of $6,750.

(B) Stock
issued for Cash

In
June 2019, the Company issued an additional 254,506 shares of Common Stock for cash of $68,717 to Metrolina upon its exercise
of its option to purchase additional stock to maintain up to 10% ownership of the Company’s Common Stock outstanding.

In
December 2019, the Company issued 15,400 shares of Common Stock to early investors in the Regulation A offering, valued at $4,158.

(C) Stock
issued for Acquisition

In
January 2019, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock to Gvest Real Estate Capital LLC to acquire the 25% minority
interest in Pecan Grove, which were valued at the historical cost value of $537,562.

(D) Stock
Split

In
March 2018, the Company completed a 1-for-6 reverse split of its outstanding shares of Common Stock resulting in the reduction
of the total outstanding Common Stock from 60,000,000 shares to 10,000,062 shares. The consolidated financial statements have
been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split.

F-14

(E) Equity
Incentive Plan

In
December 2017, the Board of Directors, with the approval of a majority of the stockholders of the Company, adopted the Manufactured
Housing Properties Inc. Stock Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) which is administered by the Compensation Committee.

The
Company has issued options to directors and officers under the Plan. One third of the options vest immediately, and two thirds
vest in equal annual installments over a two-year period. All of the options are exercisable at a purchase price of $0.01 per
share.

The
Company recorded stock option expense of $4,774 and $69 during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The
following table summarizes the stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

Number of options

Weighted average exercise
price (per share)

Weighted average remaining
contractual term (in years)

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

698,000

0.01

10.0

Granted

-

-

-

Exercised

-

-

-

Forfeited / cancelled / expired

(156,666

)

-

-

Outstanding at December 31, 2018

541,334

$

0.01

9.0

Granted

136,500

0.27

10.0

Exercised

-

-

-

Forfeited / cancelled / expired

(21,659

)

-

-

Outstanding at December 31, 2019

656,175

$

0.21

8.7

The
aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’s
closing stock price at fiscal year-end and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have
been received by the option holder had all options holders exercised their options on December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2019,
there were 565,175 “in-the-money” options with an aggregate intrinsic value of 1,549,106.

The
following table summarizes information concerning options outstanding as of December 31, 2019:

Strike
Price
Range ($)

Outstanding
stock options

Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term (in years)

Weighted
average
outstanding
strike price

Vested stock
options

Weighted
average vested
strike price

$

0.01

519,675

8.0

$

0.01

519,675

$

0.01

0.27

136,500

10.0

0.27

45,500

0.27

The
following table summarizes information concerning options outstanding as of December 31, 2018:

Strike
Price
Range ($)

Outstanding
stock options

Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term (in years)

Weighted average
outstanding strike price

Vested stock
options

Weighted
average vested
strike price

$

0.01

541,334

9.0

$

0.01

377,000

$

0.01

F-15

The
table below presents the weighted average expected life in years of options granted under the Plan as described above. The risk-free
rate of the stock options is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant, which corresponds with the
expected term of the option granted.

The
fair value of stock options was estimated using the Black Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions for grants
made during the periods indicated.

Stock option assumptions

December 31,2019

December 31,2018

Risk-free interest rate

0.26

%

1.95

%

Expected dividend yield

0.00

%

0.00

%

Expected volatility

15.17

%

16.71

%

Expected life of options (in years)

10

10

NOTE
7 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On
October 1, 2017, the Company issued a revolving promissory note to Raymond M. Gee, the Company’s chairman and chief executive
officer, pursuant to which the Company may borrow up to $1,500,000 from Mr. Gee on a revolving basis for working capital purposes.
This note has a five-year term with no annual interest and principal payment is deferred until the maturity date. As of December
31, 2019, the outstanding balance on this note was $797,906. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded
imputed interest related to the note of $87,577 and $44,695, respectively.

On May 8, 2017, the Company issued a promissory
note to Metrolina in the principal amount of $3,000,000. The note is interest only payment based on 8%, and 10% deferred until
maturity to be paid with principal balance. The note originally awarded Metrolina 455,000 shares of Common Stock as consideration,
which resulted in making Metrolina a related party due to its significant ownership. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the
Company paid off the entire balance on the note of $2,754,550 plus interest and amended the agreement to allow for the redeployment
of the $3,000,000 available, eliminated the conversion option whereby Metrolina could convert the ratio of total outstanding debt
at time of exercise of the option into an amount of newly issued shares of the Company’s Common Stock determined by dividing
the outstanding indebtedness by $3,000,000 multiplied by 10% with a cap of 864,500 shares. The amendment resulted in issuing an
additional 545,000 shares with a fair value of $305,200 for a total of 1,000,000 shares awarded to Metrolina. The note gives Metrolina
the right and option to purchase its pro rata share of debt or equity securities issued to maintain up to 10% equity interest in
the Company at the most recent price of any equity transaction for seven years from the amendment dated February 26, 2019. As of
December 31, 2019, the balance on this note was $1,730,000. The related party note is guaranteed by Mr. Gee.

In
January 2019, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock to Gvest Real Estate Capital LLC, an entity controlled by Mr.
Gee, to acquire the 25% minority interest in Pecan Grove, which were valued at the historical cost value of $537,562.

During the year ended December 31, 2019,
the Company entered into an office lease agreement with Gvest Real Estate Capital LLC for the lease of its offices. The lease is
$4,000 per month and is on a month-to-month term. Total rent expense for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $16,000.

During the years ended December 31, 2019
and 2018, the Company recorded $48,319 and $4,000, respectively in revenues related to property management consulting services
provided to Gvest Real Estate Capital LLC.

During
the year ended December 31, 2019, Mr. Gee received a $50,000 fee for his personal guarantee on a promissory note relating to a
loan for one of our acquisitions. The fee was recorded as a loan cost and is amortized over the five year life of the loan.

NOTE
8 – INCOME TAXES

On
December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”) that significantly reforms
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”). The TCJA, among other things, contains
significant changes to corporate taxation, including a reduction of the corporate tax rate from a top marginal rate of 35% to
a flat rate of 21%, effective as of January 1, 2018; a limitation of the tax deduction for interest expense; a limitation of the
deduction for net operating losses to 80% of current year taxable income and elimination of net operating loss carrybacks, in
each case, for losses arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 (though any such tax losses may be carried forward
indefinitely); modifying or repealing many business deductions and credits, including reducing the business tax credit for certain
clinical testing expenses incurred in the testing of certain drugs for rare diseases or conditions generally referred to as “orphan
drugs”; and repeal of the federal Alternative Minimum Tax.

F-16

At
December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had deferred tax assets principally arising from the net operating loss carry forwards
for income tax purposes multiplied by the Federal statutory tax rate of 21%. As management of the Company cannot determine that
it is more likely than not that we will realize the benefit of the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance equal to the deferred
tax asset has been established at December 31, 2019 and 2018.

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company
had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $3,057,500 and $1,492,600, respectively. The change in the valuation allowance
for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were $403,987 and $275,525, respectively.

The
significant components of the deferred tax asset at December 31, 2019 and 2018 was as follows:

For the Years Ended

December 31, 2019

December 31, 2018

Statutory rate applied to income (loss) before income taxes

$

(520,747

)

$

(322,845

)

Increase in income taxes results from:

Non-deductible expense

123,107

55,606

Change in tax rate estimates

-

-

Change in valuation allowance

403,987

275,525

Income tax expense (benefit)

$

6,347

$

8,286

The
difference between income tax expense computed by applying the federal statutory corporate tax rate and provision for actual income
tax is as follows:

For the Year Ended

December 31,2019

December 31,2018

Income tax benefit at U.S. statutory rate of 34%

-21.00

%

-21.00

%

Income tax benefit - State

-3.33

%

-2.04

%

Non-deductible expense

5.97

%

4.29

%

Change in valuation allowance

19.58

%

21.25

%

Income tax expense (benefit)

1.22

%

2.50

%

Deferred
income taxes result from temporary differences in the recognition of income and expenses for the financial reporting purposes
and for tax purposes. The effects of temporary differences that gave rise to deferred tax assets are as follows:

For the Year Ended

December 31,2019

December 31,2018

Deferred tax assets:

Amortization expense

$

11,544

$

7,288

Operating loss carryforwards

780,978

381,247

Gross deferred tax assets

792,522

388,535

Valuation allowance

(792,522

)

(388,535

)

Net deferred income tax asset

$

-

$

-

NOTE
9 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Additional
Closings of Regulation A Offering

Subsequent to December 31, 2019, the Company
sold an aggregate of 92,640 shares of Series B Preferred Stock for total gross proceeds of $956,400 under the Regulation A offering
described above. After deducting a placement fee and other expenses, the Company received net proceeds of approximately $889,452.
The Company also issued 3,900 shares of Common Stock to early investors.

F-17

Countryside
Acquisition

On
January 7, 2020, MHP Pursuits LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a purchase and sale agreement with J
& A Real Estate LLC (“J&A”) for the purchase of a manufactured housing community known as Countryside Estates
Mobile Home Park, which is located in Lancaster, North Carolina and totals 110 sites, for a total purchase price of $3.7 million.
On March 12, 2020, the closing was completed and the Company’s newly formed wholly owned subsidiary Countryside MHP LLC
(“Countryside”) purchased the property.

In
connection with the closing, on March 12, 2020, Countryside issued a promissory note to J&A in the principal amount of $3,000,000.
The remainder of the purchase price, or $700,000, was paid in cash. The note bears interest at the rate of 5.5% per annum, or
the maximum rate allowed by applicable law, and is due and payable in full on March 20, 2050. Payments for the first twelve (12)
months of the term of the note shall be interest-only in the amount of $13,750 per month. Thereafter, principal and interest,
in the amount of $17,201 per month, shall be due and payable based upon a thirty (30) year amortization. If any monthly payment
is not received by J&A within fifteen (15) days after the applicable due date, Countryside must pay a late charge in an amount
equal to the delinquent amount then due multiplied by 4%. Countryside may prepay the note, in whole or in party, at any time without
penalty.

The
note also contains customary events of default, including: (i) if Countryside shall be in default in the payment of any principal,
interest or other amount due under the note and such default shall not be cured within five (5) days after written notice from
J&A; (ii) if Countryside shall be in default in the performance of any non-monetary obligation in the note and such default
shall not be cured within thirty (30) days after written notice from J&A; or (iii) if Countryside shall default in the due
observation or performance of any covenant, condition or agreement contained in the mortgage described below and such default
shall not be cured within thirty (30) days after written notice from J&A. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, interest
on the aggregate outstanding indebtedness (including accrued interest) of the note shall increase to 5.5% per annum plus the U.S.
Prime Rate as measured and reported by the Wall Street Journal and in effect on the date of default, until such aggregate indebtedness
is paid in full.

The
note is secured by a mortgage, assignment of rents and leases, security agreement and fixture filing with respect to the property.
The mortgage contains customary representations, warranties and covenants by Countryside and remedies upon an event of default
under the note.

Evergreen
Acquisition

On
January 1, 2020, MHP Pursuits LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Evergreen
Marketing LLC for the purchase of a manufactured housing community known as Evergreen Pointe Mobile Home Park, which is located
in Dandridge, Tennessee and totals 65 sites, for a total purchase price of $1,438,000. On March 17, 2020, the closing was completed
and the Company’s newly formed wholly owned subsidiary Evergreen MHP LLC (“Evergreen”) purchased the property.

In
connection with the closing, on March 17, 2020, Evergreen entered into a loan agreement with Hunt Mortgage Capital, LLC (the “Lender”),
for a loan in the principal amount of $1,150,000 and Evergreen issued a promissory note to the Lender in the principal amount
of $1,150,000. The remainder of the purchase price, or $288,000, was paid in cash.

The
note bears interest at a rate of 3.99% per annum and is due and payable on April 1, 2032. The monthly payments under the note
are equal to $5,483.65. If any monthly payment is not received by the Lender within ten (10) days after the applicable due date,
Evergreen must pay a late charge in an amount equal to the delinquent amount then due multiplied by 5%. Furthermore, if any payment
remains past due for thirty (30) days or more, interest on such unpaid amounts shall accrue at the lesser of 7.99% or the maximum
rate allowed by applicable law. Evergreen may prepay the note in full, but not in part, at any time if it pays a prepayment premium
calculated in accordance with the loan agreement.

The
note is secured by the property and guaranteed by Mr. Raymond M. Gee, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Gvest Capital
Real Estate LLC, an entity controlled by Mr. Gee, and the Company (the “Guarantors”).

The
loan agreement was subject to customary closing conditions and contains customary representations and warranties. The loan agreement
also contains customary financial and other covenants for a loan of this type. The loan agreement also contains customary events
of default, some of which are subject to cure periods as set forth in the loan agreement, including, but not limited to: (i) any
failure by Evergreen to pay or deposit when due any amount required by the note, the loan agreement or any other loan document
(as defined in the loan agreement); (ii) any failure by Evergreen to maintain the insurance coverage required by any loan document;
(iii) if any warranty, representation, certification, or statement of Evergreen or any Guarantor in the loan agreement or any
of the other loan documents is false inaccurate, or misleading in any material respect when made; (iv) the fraud, gross negligence,
willful misconduct, or material misrepresentation or material omission by or on behalf of Evergreen or any Guarantor or any of
their officers, directors, trustees, partners, members, or managers in connection with the application for, or creation of, the
loan or any financial statement, rent roll, or other report or information provided to Lender during the term of the loan; (v)
the occurrence of any transfer (as defined in the loan agreement) not permitted by the loan documents; (vi) the occurrence of
a bankruptcy event (as defined in the loan agreement); (vii) if a Guarantor is a natural person, the death of such individual,
unless certain requirements set forth in the loan agreement are met; (viii) the occurrence of a guarantor bankruptcy event (as
defined in the loan agreement), unless certain requirements of the loan agreement are met; (ix) any failure by Evergreen or a
Guarantor to comply with certain covenants in the loan agreement; or (x) any failure by Evergreen to perform any of its obligations
under the loan agreement or any loan document as and when required.

Repayment
of Metrolina Note

In
February 2020, the Company repaid $1,000,000 of principal and accrued interest on the Metrolina related party promissory note.

Loan Refinancing

On April 1, 2020, the Company refinanced
the loans for Butternut MHP Land LLC (see Note 4) with the existing lender to increase the loan amount to $1,388,019 and to extend
the maturity date to April 10, 2025. In addition, the interest rate was changed to 6% per annum, provided that on April 10, 2023
and thereafter, the interest rate shall be equal to (i) the per annum rate of interest identified as the “Prime Rate”
as published in the monthly rates section of the Wall Street Journal plus (ii) 1% per annum, adjusted as the first day of each
calendar quarter. The loan, as modified, is secured by the real estate assets of Butternut MHP Land LLC and is guaranteed by the
Company and Raymond M. Gee, who received a loan guarantee fee of $70,000.

F-18

SIGNATURES

Pursuant
to the requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:
April 14, 2020

MANUFACTURED
HOUSING PROPERTIES INC.

/s/
Raymond M. Gee

Name:
Raymond M. Fee

Title:
Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf
of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.