To continue using this website, please tell us a little about yourself:

I am a financial adviser

I am a discretionary fund manager / multimanager

I am a financial paraplanner

I work in financial services

I am a private investor

This site uses cookies. Some of the cookies are essential for parts of the site to operate and have already been set.
You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but if you do, parts of the site may not work. To find out more
about cookies on the website and how to delete cookies, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Paul Kim

Overall, performing about the same as the peer group composite. However, over a long track record, the manager has, period by period, consistently underformed the peer group. Stockpicking has made a contribution to results, which have not been particularly exposed to falling markets.

Manager profile

Paul has managed discretionary portfolios and multi-manager funds for more than 30 years. He was instrumental in setting up Investment Manager Selection Ltd with Richard Timberlake and Peter O’Connor in 1999 and the subsequent growth of the business. In 2008, IMS was bought by BNP Paribas and re-named Fundquest, with Paul being responsible for the management of the IMS funds and client funds, including three for Aviva Investors. Paul has also managed discretionary portfolios and services at Capel Cure Myers and Sun Life Portfolio Counselling Services (AXA Sun Life).

Rolling Alpha Quartile shows a manager's alpha score in quartile terms, plotting his or her risk adjusted performance against
all other managers in the UT & OEICs universe. The best managers are those who are consistently ranked in the first or second quartile.

Quartile 1

Quartile 2

Quartile 3

Quartile 4

0-36m

12-48m

24-60m

36-72m

48-84m

Discrete calendar year performance : Paul Kim

Discrete performance

0-12m

12-24m

24-36m

36-48m

48-60m

60-72m

72-84m

84-96m

96-108m

108-120m

Paul Kim

8.8

3.2

4.3

-

-

-1.6

12.1

20.5

-22.0

4.6

Peer Group Composite

12.1

-1.1

5.5

-

-

0.4

10.3

21.9

-21.3

5.0

Over / Under

-3.3

4.3

-1.2

-

-

-2.0

1.8

-1.4

-0.7

-0.4

Performance vs peer group composite: Paul Kim

How a manager matches up against their peers gives you some idea of how talented they are.
Very few managers perform equally well in rising and falling markets, so knowing which type of market a manager is capable of performing well within is also important.

Data provided by FE. Care has been taken to ensure that the information is correct, but FE neither warrants, represents nor guarantees the contents of information, nor does it accept any responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions or any inconsistencies herein. Past performance does not predict future performance, it should not be the main or sole reason for making an investment decision. The value of investments and any income from them can fall as well as rise.