Oscar van Vlijmen wrote:
> A more robust but slow procedure is to write a comment to the epsg database
> maintainers. Use the link at the bottom of the home page www.epsg.org
> An updated epsg database will eventually get processed by mr. Warmerdam in
> order to produce a PROJ epsg file. Then again, what are the chances that the
> no_uoff option actually will find its way into the PROJ epsg file? It would
> probably need adjustment of the processing scripts.
Folks,
Note, that you should only be contacting the EPSG database maintainers if
you are very confident that the problem is actually in their database,
and not in the translation I do. I'm sure they are already getting somewhat
annoyed at the number of PROJ.4 related reports they are getting that
actually have nothing to do with their database itself.
So, in this case the question would be whether they have referenced a
proper projection method for the Michigan coordinate system or not. Perhaps
they do, and I just translate it improperly in which case - don't bug them!
Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org