New to the forum, old hat at MBTI, but still uncertain of type, help me?

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Well if he thinks that his interests help make up his identity, then yes he does identify with those things. Do you think your interests help make up your identity? Furthermore, if the field of ballet includes ballerinas, and you are a ballerina, then in identifying with yourself, you identify with at least one part of the field of ballet.

This is ridiculous. If he had meant any of these things, it would have shown up somewhere in the lengthy wall of text with whom he chose to introduce himself. What the text does support is the possibility he identifies with pianos, Ginkgo. Accept it. Embrace it. Deal with it.

i·den·ti·fy [ahy-den-tuh-fahy, ih-den-] Show IPA verb, -fied, -fy·ing.
verb (used with object)
1.
to recognize or establish as being a particular person or thing; verify the identity of: to identify handwriting; to identify the bearer of a check.
2.
to serve as a means of identification for: His gruff voice quickly identified him.
3.
to make, represent to be, or regard or treat as the same or identical: They identified Jones with the progress of the company.4.
to associate in name, feeling, interest, action, etc. (usually followed by with ): He preferred not to identify himself with that group.
5.
Biology . to determine to what group (a given specimen) belongs.

Meanwhile, I love how you had to skip past 3 entries in order to support the point you're making. Especially when entry #1 reads

to recognize or establish as being a particular person or thing;

All I want to know is if he identifies with inanimate objects. If so, what's the deal with that?

And so long as you haven’t experienced this: to die and so to grow,
you are only a troubled guest on the dark earth

This is ridiculous. If he had meant any of these things, it would have shown up somewhere in the lengthy wall of text with whom he chose to introduce himself. What the text does support is the possibility he identifies with pianos, Ginkgo. Accept it. Embrace it. Deal with it.

Nah.

Meanwhile, I love how you had to skip past 3 entries in order to support the point you're making. Especially when entry #1 reads

At least your love doesn't depend on make-up.

All I want to know is if he identifies with inanimate objects. If so, what's the deal with that?

Yeah but you didn't ask him in post #11. Therefore, you didn't ask him when it was most convenient at that time, due to me clearing up the issue.

What the hell do you think I was asking, then? I was ASKING if he identified with inanimate objects. My post before this one was the first declarative statement I've directed towards the OP this entire thread.

You are seriously overstepping yourself if you think I need you or anyone else to step in to interpret or "clarify" anything I have to say. Ever. Especially if your idea of clarifying things is wanking over semantics.

And so long as you haven’t experienced this: to die and so to grow,
you are only a troubled guest on the dark earth

What the hell do you think I was asking, then? I was ASKING if he identified with inanimate objects. My post before this one was the first declarative statement I've directed towards the OP this entire thread.

You are seriously overstepping yourself if you think I need you or anyone else to step in to interpret or "clarify" anything I have to say. Ever. Especially if your idea of clarifying things is wanking over semantics.

What the hell do you think I was asking, then? I was ASKING if he identified with inanimate objects. My post before this one was the first declarative statement I've directed towards the OP this entire thread.

You are seriously overstepping yourself if you think I need you or anyone else to step in to interpret or "clarify" anything I have to say. Ever. Especially if your idea of clarifying things is wanking over semantics.

I honestly thought your first post was in jest and decided to play along.