That depends, if you like a very up to date system and cant wait for release packs and will rely on update tools like apt-get with no tollerance for bugs, no, stick with Mint 11. There isnt a lot of difference and Mint 11 will be rock solid stable.

I trust Microsoft about as far as I could comfortably spit a dead ratUbuntu is my past, it is no longer the place it once was, on its forums you are no longer free to voice your opinion.64bit Linux Powered

there will be occasional regressions and breakages, so if you don't mind tinkering, and troubleshooting (since fixes don't always come down that quickly) then you will probably like it...otherwise i would suggest you stay with mint 11...I tried LMDE twice but always ended up coming back to mint main edition...65% of mint users use main edition while about 10% use LMDE....i think there is a reason for that

jan_goyvaerts wrote:Btw, does anybody know whether the Debian Edition is a rolling update via apt. Or the Mint-way: backing up & fresh installs.

Jan

with LMDE you don't need re-installs, it rolls (well at much as debian testing does- one can't forget the deep freeze), as for stability and bug-free you have 2 options- stay with the default repos in the new isos and follow the UP, this way you will have a stable, reliable systemhttp://blog.linuxmint.com/?p=1781- change your repos to track testing, you will have a more up-to-date system, but breakages may occur (in more than one year following testing i was never left with an unbootable system and the issues were always easily solved with a quickly google search or here in the forum, specially here viewtopic.php?f=198&t=67502 )

autocrosser wrote:Debian Edition is rolling updates---no re-installs...so a bug could crop up at any time. I use Apt or Aptitude for my updates.

Apt and Aptitude is a fast way to introduce a ton of bugs into LMDE. I tried it and found I was fixing issues a few times a week.

I trust Microsoft about as far as I could comfortably spit a dead ratUbuntu is my past, it is no longer the place it once was, on its forums you are no longer free to voice your opinion.64bit Linux Powered

Either way is a bad idea for some users imho because Apt-get and aptitude bypasses the ranking in the mint update application. Apt or Aptitude will just blindly update all released upgraded packages regardless of the possibility of them causing bugs. Those that want a more stable experience, that have a low tolerance for bugs, and/or don't have good troubleshooting skills (linux newbies for example) should imho stick to the Mint Update application or even better they should consider using upgrade packs only.

I trust Microsoft about as far as I could comfortably spit a dead ratUbuntu is my past, it is no longer the place it once was, on its forums you are no longer free to voice your opinion.64bit Linux Powered

Its probably happened after I uninstalled and went with Mint 11 because of the constant nagging bugs. Nothing that couldnt be fixed, but I would rather use applications than fix issues. But the advice in my last comment is still good to use update packs for those who dont want to deal with bugs or cant.

I trust Microsoft about as far as I could comfortably spit a dead ratUbuntu is my past, it is no longer the place it once was, on its forums you are no longer free to voice your opinion.64bit Linux Powered

LM 9, 10, 11, 12 all run off of Ubuntu which in turn gets much of the packaging from debian unstable/testing. Excuse me for saying that the only thing more stable than debian unstable is debian stable concerning debian. If you want stable no matter where it's used, use debian stable or slackware. But as for all of LM and LMDE, it's all debian unstable/testing when you get right down to it.

Use it at work, use it on your ipod, use it to flush your toilet. It's plenty stable to do what's needed in any name of the game. The only issues you might encounter are just the changes that are made by LinuxMint. Maybe a few aesthetic issues. That's about it. But to claim it's better to use Linux Mint 11 at work instead of LMDE due to LMDE being experimental is a flawed view.

LMDE is no more "experimental" than any linux distro out there using the same debian branches. And very few distro's use debian stable as a base. With few exceptions like crunchbang (which is also very good).