Stalin And The Soviet Roswell.

How far this is factual, it’s difficult to tell, more so as it comes from Pravda. But perhaps there’s some truth in it after all.

The Soviet leadership then headed by Joseph Stalin didn’t believe Romay’s lies at all. (General Roger Romay, was commander of the 8th
American Air Brigade, who declared that the Roswell incident was a mere crash of a weather balloon). That was the very beginning of a campaign of mass
disinformation. The USSR believed that the story about a weather balloon crashing was just an attempt to hide the truth. The military unit that
recovered the remains of the UFO was believed to be America’s best trained Air Force unit.

In order to clear up the situation, Joseph Stalin ordered three Soviet scientists to research data obtained by the KGB in the USA and define to what
extent such mysterious objects were dangerous for the Soviet Union. These three men were talented mathematician Mstislav Keldysh, chemist Alexander
Topchiyev, and physician Sergey Korolev.

In 1948, on Stalin’s order, the first sample of a UFO was brought to the Moscow region. The find was dug up, cut into pieces, and loaded onto
trucks. The parts were taken to a secret testing area in the Moscow region.

Joseph Stalin personally controlled the project and completely relied upon Sergey Korolev’s research. Joseph Stalin insisted that the
group of Soviet scientists must successfully complete their research and take the lead over the Americans’ space program.english.pravda.ru...

By the way, did the space programs of both the Soviet Union and America rely on back engineered alien technology obtained from these crashed
UFOs? In 1903, a machine carrying a man had raised itself by its own power into the air in free flight. On the afternoon of July 20, 1969,
Armstrong and Aldrin landed their lunar module, the Eagle, on the lunar surface. Within just sixty five years man had set foot on the Moon! Darn, in
65 years we haven’t even found a cure for the common cold!!

I'm one of the people who believe a lot can happen in 65 years, and I really don't think getting something into space is outside the realms of
possibility within 65 years once you can get something into the sky.

Once you know how to do something, it is easy to improve that technology. Look how far computers have come in the past 20 years. I do admit that the
authenticity of the lunar landing is debatable, but I think this business about back-engineered alien technology is complete nonsense.

Originally posted by DragonsDomain
I'm one of the people who believe a lot can happen in 65 years, and I really don't think getting something into space is outside the realms of
possibility within 65 years once you can get something into the sky.

Once you know how to do something, it is easy to improve that technology. Look how far computers have come in the past 20 years. I do admit that the
authenticity of the lunar landing is debatable, but I think this business about back-engineered alien technology is complete nonsense.

Nice post mikesing, i really like your posts dude! I believe that to dd but sometimes when your in the normal public view not much has taken place in
the plast 65 years accept mere social and political changes around the world and in america. Technology wise it's stale, 2 inventions and a few
upgrades to certain things, big whoop. But i still wonder why the flight program and taken so much damage and alot of things have failed for nasa.
Wouldn't 65 years be enough time to fix alot of quibles and know why these things break?

So that's enough computational power to land on the Moon? Or was there more 'ground support' in the form of remote controlling the space craft with
the help of advanced technology? Hmmm...Food for thought!

So what the devil were those Russians doing all those years from the time they got hold of that UFO and alien tech? Not poodle-faking I'm sure! Or
selling it in the scrap yard as junk! That's dumb, huh? They were working on it and how!

Also check out this Russian vid. It says that the technology of the propulsion system is classified.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.