It’s not easy being “GREEN” especially when it appears that the entire so-called man-made global warming science was a fabricated conspiracy.

It was an inconvenient email hacking to say the least that exposes what could be one of the greatest scandals and conspiracies in modern science … can you say “junk science”.

The UK Telegraph reported that emails and thousands of files have been hackedfrom a UK advocacy center, the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka Hadley CRU). The emails and files were reposted on-line which all but indicate that these “global warming” activists were as Town Hall states, “have been playing fast and loose with scientific evidence of global climate change.” The emails show manipulation of evidence, doubts about whether the world really was heating up, collusion, corruption and suppression of evidence

… And of lying, collusion, conspiracy and corruption

From Watts Up With That: This is a must read for all. Check out the emails that beyond a shadow of a doubt show a conspiracy to fabricate the truth, out right lie and attempt to prevent dissent against global warming.

The file was large, about 61 megabytes, containing hundreds of files.

It contained data, code, and emails from Phil Jones at CRU to and from many people.

I’ve seen the file, it appears to be genuine and from CRU. Others who have seen it concur- it appears genuine. There are so many files it appears unlikely that it is a hoax. The effort would be too great.

Here is some of the emails just posted at Climate Audit on this thread:

Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,Once Tim’s got a diagram here we’ll send that either later today orfirst thing tomorrow.I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real tempsto each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline. Mike’s series got the annualland and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH landN of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 withdata through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.Thanks for the comments, Ray.

Comments

You offer no proof or even the slightest evidence that the ‘entire’ global warming theory is a hoax or conspiracy. You are basing your article on the speculative right-wing morons that have no evidence themselves that the entire global warming theory is a conspiracy. You can spin this all you’d like, but if you actually took the fucking time to read something for once in your life, you would understand that it’s not the hoax you wish it were. Yes, it is going to have a negative impact on public perception of global warming, but it does not confirm anything regarding a hoax or conspiracy. The facts are the facts and you are incredibly irresponsible for putting your own ideology before the truth. You only know what you want to know, it seems. Your political ideology only allows you to see one thing, and it’s pathetic.

Orson on
November 21st, 2009 9:18 pm

Let me answer David – who himself cites no evidence – and show that he is being he is a gullible idiot.

If the best evidence for warming is consistent with the best historical evidence of natural warming, then invoking man-made CO2 as the culprit and manufacturing “evidence” for more temperature change – which the “Hockey Team” largely associated with CRU, above) – is fraudulent.

The 20th century’s rate of warming has been more or less 1C degree. Now observe the 30 year global record from satellites:

No more than 0.3C degrees for three decades and possibly less.
This is entirely consistent with continuing natural warming. Ergo, the hysteria promoting global warming is invented fiction, much as Michael Crichton wrote in “State of Fear” – including the fraud now uncovered at CRU.

MITs atmospheric physicist Richard Lindzen now calls himself a proud “denier.” That is, he denies there is any significant or catastrophic warming from man-made CO@ gases. It is propaganda, he says.

If you’d bother to read Lawrence Solomon’s “The Deniers” (2008) you’d know that this is the position of many elite scientists. The head of the world federation of scientists, the majority of Japan’s earth scientists, the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Polish academy of Science, most French and Italian scientists, the Indian government. in fact, skepticism is the position of most solar scientists….on and on and on.

joe on
November 21st, 2009 9:26 pm

to “David”

were you looking in a mirror as you typed those words?

Terrence Deagle on
November 23rd, 2009 12:23 am

An inconvenient hacking. I love the title. If this is true and can be proven to be true then the people who committed this fraud (all of them including Gorea) should be rounded up, tried and convicted. It is truly a scam of epic proportions.

Terrence Deagle on
November 23rd, 2009 12:25 am

An inconvenient hacking. I love the title. If people can prove this, than the people who did this fraud should be rounded up, tried and convicted. It is truly a crime of epic proportions.

For years Mr. William M. Connolley (talk) and group of biased editors have cried for peer reviewed papers from skeptics to support claims that Global Warming is nothing more than a hoax.

It is clear now after the CRU info has been released that the peer reviewed process was controlled as a self perpetuating barrier to such truth being revealed in skeptical papers.

Mr. Connolley, you will stand trial now for fraud and criminal negligence in maintaining such disinformation for manipulation of billions of dollars worldwide.

For every innocent child who has viewed your information on Wiki (which was manipulated on purpose for expressed intent) you should be sentenced to one (1) year in prison. It will be hard to serve out millions of years for those crimes…

[...] global warming hoax. It would appear that Al Gore’s Inconvenient Truth has been trumped by an “inconvenient” email hacking. The real inconvenient truth seems to be the fact that the Climate”gate” [...]

james on
November 27th, 2009 4:04 pm

I thought leftist were supposed to be “open-minded”. Since becoming a evil gas guzzling right-wing not that long ago, I have also found myself a better skeptic. I would personally like to see the data so I can judge for myself. If anyone can link this I would be grateful

[...] pro-global warming junk science countries. Maybe these countries prior to their mass walk out can ask about the emails that show the fraud that has been global warming? Maybe they can also ask about that dumped raw [...]

Arch Angel on
December 7th, 2009 11:08 am

I’ve been trying to convince people for the last 10 years that the doomsday global warming and radical green movement was a red herring. Thank God, this will hopefully be the death nail in the Global Warming scam.

The Carbon Footprint tax is a ridiculous concept with little or negative impact at huge expense. If we really want to do something for the environment… why did they end the home insulation tax credit? Somewhere in the area of 30% of all oil our fossil fuel consumption is spent on home temperature regulation (heating and cooling). We could easily cut that in half by extending and even improving the tax credit for insulating older homes.

But no… better to chase asinine schemes cooked up by jack asses like Al Gore to turn carbon output into a Las Vegas roulette game. Yeah that makes a lot of sense. Maybe he should have stuck to inventing the Internet.

[...] Gas prices are already on the rise and now Senators Kerry (MA-D), Graham (SC-R), and Lieberman (CT-I) want to increase the price of a gallon of gas with a new tax. Brilliant. The three are about to unveil their bill on April 26, I guess the Three Amigos did not get the global warming scandal, climate hoax, junk science memo. [...]

[...] hypocrisy. Remember when the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka Hadley CRU) emails were hacked into and leaked to the public showing the fraud, collusion and corruption of the Global Warming crowd. Democrat [...]

[...] NASA factual data is really going to change the global warming alarmists narrative? The alarmists never cared about the facts, why would they care now? As stated at the Lonely Conservative, look for the global warming [...]