Yes, then in a concert in California, in the middle of the show, I would turn off the music and the lights. Then re-enter with blast of fire and start a cover of Amon Amarth with my real band and continue with our original tracks. Maybe even have a few people in the audience start a Disney Mosh pit.

Yes, then in a concert in California, in the middle of the show, I would turn off the music and the lights. Then re-enter with blast of fire and start a cover of Amon Amarth with my real band and continue with our original tracks. Maybe even have a few people in the audience start a Disney Mosh pit.

to the people who are saying no: just think of it as a day job. would you rather try to make that million flipping hamburgers? or playing it as a real but nameless band one show at a time? that would take forever.

Not with disney, I still said yes to the poll, but I would make a more mainstream rock CD for a major record label like roadrunner or WB if it meant I could play music for the rest of my life rather than just stay on the club circuit and have an actual job to supplement income.

Yes, but not as much as if you were signed to the extent Disney tools are.

Of course I would sell out.

Of course not, but I don't need/want that much.

Plus I wouldn't like being in the public eye like that, and I wouldn't want to betray my scene. I know what it's like to see bands that I love achieve national recognition and fame, to a point where I feel uncomfortable at their shows. I wouldn't want to do that to the people that supported me in my scene. I know a lot of you won't understand this, but when you listen to the music that I do you see major labels differently. I wouldn't want somebody controlling my music, and feeling disconnected from the fans on stage. There's a huge difference in playing a show to 50 kids and playing a show to 50,000 kids. I'd prefer playing to 50 kids and not making a lot of money than playing to 50,000 and being rich.