Saturday, 12 April 2014

'Reeva was standing behind the toilet door talking to you when you shot her'- Prosecutors say

Oscar Pistorius' three-day
cross-examination reached a dramatic climax today as the world-famous
athlete was accused of deliberately shooting his girlfriend through a
toilet door as the couple talked and argued in the early hours of
Valentine's Day last year.

"You knew that Reeva went behind the door and you shot at her,' Mr Nel said. 'You shot at her knowing she was behind the door.'

Pistorius
denied the charge as prosecutor Gerrie Nel pushed the Paralympic
champion on his version of the exact events in the seconds before he
killed Reeva Steenkamp by firing four times through the stall door in
his bathroom with his 9mm pistol on February 14, 2013.

Mr Nel challenged the double-amputee sprinter repeatedly as to why Miss Steenkamp failed to scream when she was shot four times.Continue...Mr Nel, one of South Africa's top
attorneys, said it was beyond belief that 29-year-old law graduate and
model Miss Steenkamp would have remained silent in the tiny cubicle with
an armed Pistorius shouting and screaming in the adjoining bathroom.

Mr
Nel later followed up with his central accusation - that the couple had
an argument and Steenkamp fled to the toilet pursued by Pistorius, who
then shot her through the closed wooden door.

Pistorius denied the accusation, before the court adjourned until Monday morning.

Pistorius,
who claims he shot Miss Steenkamp by mistake thinking she was a
nighttime intruder behind a toilet door in his bathroom, faces life in
prison if convicted of murder.

Pistorius says he shouted at what he thought was an intruder in his house and also at Miss Steenkamp to call the police. Mr
Nel said that if that were the case, she would not have stood up
against the door. She would have retreated away from it. And she would
have responded to Pistorius, the chief prosecutor said. 'I don't think anybody could say where she would have stood,' Pistorius replied.

Mr Nel led the double-amputee runner through his own account of what happened in the moments before he shot Miss Steenkamp.

Pistorius
said he heard a noise in the bathroom and moved down a hallway on his
stumps towards the bathroom while screaming to his girlfriend - who he
claims he had believed was in the bedroom - to get down and call the
police.

He said he then
heard what sounded like the toilet door slamming, then kept quiet as he
reached the bathroom entrance, then heard a noise in the toilet that he
perceived to be the sound of wood on wood, which he said made him think
someone was opening the toilet door - which he said fit badly in the
frame - to attack him.

And then, Pistorius said, he opened fire.

At
each stage, Mr Nel argued that the account was improbable, questioning
why Pistorius did not establish where Miss Steenkamp was and make sure
she was okay, and why he would approach the alleged danger zone if he
felt vulnerable on his stumps.

Mr Nel said: 'If you spoke to Reeva, the two of you could have taken lots of other steps.'

Pistorius said he thought the perceived threat could strike at any moment: 'There was no time.'During the cross-examination, Pistorius said Steenkamp did not scream at any point during the incident.

However, the 27-year-old track star said that he may not have heard her cries because of his ears ringing from the first shot.Several people living nearby have testified to hearing a woman's terrified screams before and during a volley of shots.'She's
awake. She's in the toilet. You're shouting. You're screaming. You're
three metres from her. She would have responded. She would not have been
quiet, Mr Pistorius,' Mr Nel said.'She didn't respond, my Lady,' Pistorius replied, addressing judge Thokozile Masipa.

'Did she scream at all whilst you shot her four times?' Mr Nel continued.'No, my Lady.''Are
you sure? Are you sure, Mr Pistorius, that Reeva did not scream after
the first shot?' Mr Nel continued. 'Are you, Mr Pistorius?'After a brief silence, Pistorius said: 'My Lady, I wish she had let me know she was there.''After you fired the first shot, did she scream?' Mr Nel asked.'No, my Lady.'

'Are you sure? Would you have heard her?' Mr Nel asked.

'I don't think I would have heard her.''Exactly.''A gunshot went off, my ears were ringing,' Pistorius said.'How can you exclude the fact she was screaming if you couldn't hear?' Mr Nel asked.'If I couldn't hear it then I couldn't hear,' Pistorius retorted.'No, you said, Mr Pistorius, she never screamed. You couldn't hear. You're just saying that,' Mr Nel said.'That is what I'm saying,' Pistorius replied.'No, that's not what you're saying. You're saying she didn't scream,' Mr Nel followed up.

'My
Lady, the sound of that gunshot in the bathroom, you wouldn't have
heard anyone scream. The decibels of the gunshot, I don't believe you
would have heard anyone scream. When I had finished firing the gunshots,
I was screaming and I couldn't hear my own voice.'

Pistorius' return to the witness box
today followed a week of testimony in which the double-amputee runner
said he killed Miss Steenkamp by accident after mistaking her for an
intruder in his home last year.

Mr
Nel challenged the athlete's statements that he was worried about crime
before the fatal shooting. The
prosecutor examined the details of the alarm system at Pistorius' house,
questioning why the athlete would believe an intruder had broken into
his home when he had extensive security measures, including interior and
exterior sensors.

Pistorius
said he activated the sensors on the home alarm system before going to
sleep on the night he killed Miss Steenkamp, but feared that building
contractors doing work on his house may have moved some of the security
beacons.

The
prosecutor said Pistorius had not mentioned immediately after the
shooting that he had fears that building contractors had removed some of
the security beacons, specifically near the bathroom window where he
allegedly thought an intruder may have gained access on the night he
killed Miss Steenkamp.

Querying why Pistorius had not
mentioned those fears earlier, Mr Nel said the athlete was trying to build
a story to explain his fears of an intruder and therefore a mistaken
shooting. 'This is the biggest example of you tailoring your evidence,' Mr Nel said. Pistorius denied he was fabricating a story. Pistorius
also said he was struggling to give clear testimony because he was
tired, prompting the judge to ask him if he was too tired to proceed
with a tough cross-examination from the chief prosecutor. Pistorius
was responding to a question from Mr Nel, who pointed to a lack of
clarity in the double-amputee runner's testimony about whether he turned
off the alarm inside his home on the night of February 14, 2013. Pistorius said he 'must have' turned off the alarm, which Mr Nel described as a vague response. The
prosecutor then asked Pistorius, who acknowledged making a mistake in
his testimony, if he needed time before continuing with his testimony. 'I don't need time,' the Olympic athlete said. 'I am tired. It's not going to change.' Mr Nel responded: 'You're trying to cover up for lies and I'm not convinced.'

Judge Thokozile Masipa interjected, asking Pistorius if he was too tired to proceed. 'You can be at a disadvantage when
you're in that box,' she said, adding that it wasn't fair to the court
if he was not alert during the proceedings. Pistorius replied that he was able to go on.

Mr
Nel also argued that Pistorius was prepared to lie about an incident as
far back as five years ago when he claims someone shot at him from
another car on a highway to build a backstory that he had a long-held
fear of being attacked. Pistorius
said he saw a 'muzzle flash' and heard 'a banging noise' as a black
Mercedes drove past him in the incident, which he said was in 2008 or
2009. Pistorius said he slowed down, turned off
the highway and eventually went to a restaurant car park and called
someone to come and pick him up.

Mr Nel asked Pistorius who he called and Pistorius replied he couldn't remember. 'You cannot not remember,' Mr Nel said. It was 'such a traumatic incident,' the prosecutor said. Mr Nel said Pistorius' failing to remember who he called was because 'it never happened.' 'It's the one night that someone almost shot you, am I right?' Mr Nel said. Pistorius said it was. 'If I could remember who I phoned I would gladly give you their name,' Pistorius said. At
one point in the proceedings, Judge Masipa had to warn Mr Nel to 'mind
your language' as she reminded him not to call a witness a liar.

The prosecution says Pistorius killed the 29-year-old after an argument on February 14, 2013.Culled from UK Daily Mail

No comments:

Post a Comment

Disclaimer:*Atinuke does NOT own any other blog/website apart from www.missatinuke.blogspot.com*Comments on this blog are NOT posted by Atinuke.*Miss Atinuke's Blog readers are SOLELY responsible for the comments they post on missatinuke.blogspot.comKindly Drop Your Comments! Thank You!