We´re said to live in the times of “fake news”, and right so. But many times fake news are produced by the agencies of power. And more important are even fake_narratives serving as cover ups for events orchestrated by the powerful. We know the story about Kennedy_allegedly_shot_by_Oswald from behind, though everyone can see in the famous “Zapruder_Film” how Kennedy´s head is thrown back by a shot from the front. Such narratives are usually upheld against all evidence and those ones protesting against that nonsense are generally dubbed “Conspiracy Theorists”.

The Great Tragedy: Nine Eleven

The most controversial incident of the last decades was surely “Nine Eleven”, serving as the pretext for the so called “War on Terror”, which is indeed a war against the Southern Hemisphere (claiming hundreds of thousands of lives) and against civil rights. Thousands of Architects_and_Engineers as well as Pilots and firemen and many more have organized to proof the official narrative a hoax. The mainstream media don´t care but more and more people see the contradictions and cracks in the narrative. Marvelous_compilations and presentations are supporting the questioning of the narrative, at times wonderfully ironical like the one by James Corbett:

Anyway, a central importance in the discussion lies in the collapse of three towers of the WTC complex allegedly caused by two impacting planes, despite the fact that there are dozens of other aspects proving the official narrative false. In deed never before has a high rise building collapsed because of a fire or an airplane impact. Instead there are uncountable examples of fierce fires in high rise buildings leaving the buildings upright. But then there were the three buildings of the World Trade Center collapsing symmetrically into their footprints, of which one wasn´t even hit by a plane: WTC 7:

Since deep studies of Nine Eleven show clearly that the event was staged by parts of the US Power Elite and its “Deep State”, we can understand that this point of non collapsing buildings by raging fires must have disturbed the perpetrators a lot. So they might have asked: what to do?!

Anyway, in January 2017 they had their Plasco_Building_in_Teheran allegedly collapsing by fire. It was only bad that there was not only fire (not too many flames to be seen but a lot of smoke) but also many puffs indicating lots of explosions. Even Architects and Engineers for the Truth of Nine Eleven dealt_with_that_Plasco_Building_collapse.

This indeed made the event a candidate for another suspected controlled demolition, serving also as a sign to the Iranian Government: look, we can do in your country whatever we want!

In June 2017 there was a terrible tragedy in London. The Grenfell_Tower_was_burning like a torch, but – though there are some mysteries around the incident – the tower didn´t collapse! Did the powers that (shouldn´t) be ask: What to do next?

What about Sao Paulo?

To be clear, as much as the evidence in the Plasco case gives me almost certainty about explosions (surely not initiated by Iran´s government) in the following case I formulate speculations, but plausible ones.

On the 1st of May a high rise building in Sao Paulo went up in flames and collapsed. The building being formerly a police headquarter and thereafter home of the Institute for Social Security was abandoned and occupied partly by squatters. It is said that a gas explosion may have caused the fire that turned the whole building into a torch, so far so bad.

In fact, after being on fire for about 90 minutes the whole building collapsed almost symmetrically into its footprint, more so than the Plasco building. And streams of pyroclastic clouds spread almost like with the WTC buildings, only more flame red:

It is not out of hand to speculate that dubious forces might have staged the event. Possibly they were trying not to cause too many casualties by warning people more or less in time, since despite the heavy fire the number of victims appears not to be as high as one might have expected. Anyway, after the political coup in Brazil the rightist new government might be so thankful to the US that they could even have tolerated such covered operation, since “only” poor squatters were affected.

Well, as said, these are speculations, but about a possible orchestration. Forces which have arranged Nine Eleven and the sophisticated cover ups would not hesitate to “support” the endangered official narrative by such actions. And the Plasco incident makes such assumptions even more likelely. If all these assumptions being true, and if the US Power Elite feels still in need to „proof“ their official narrative, then great towns also in Europe should have an eye especially on empty high rise buildings!

A very tragic fire has set the Grenfell_Tower in London ablaze. A dozen people dead, many more injured and a whole number of people still missing is a terrible record. My thoughts are with the victims and their families. But there is more on my mind as well.

The cause of the fire not yet explored, but the question arises whether the tragedy might not be the continuation of the terror_attacks in Great Britain, perpetrated by whomever they might have been perpetrated. Surely a defect fridge could not have caused that giant fire! But that´s not the only question. Since quite some time many residents have complained about lack of fire protection. Looking at the blaze it appears that the fassade of the building was anything else but fire protected, the usage of such materials appears as a criminal action:

Oh, and with this terrible fire, raging through the whole buidling, it didn´t collapse! One might remember WTC7 of the World Trade Center complex with limited fires (compared to Grenfell Tower) falling into its own footprint:

In connection with Nine Eleven an important argument of people like me, rejecting the official narrative about the event, was that no steel framed construction has ever collapsed just because of a fire, like the famous Building 7 supposedly did. On the 17th of January a 17 storey building in Teheran, the Plasco_Building, has collapsed after a heavy fire. Even something like a pyroclastic stream is to be seen on video. Are we now proven wrong?

Well, apart from the fact that the building was collapsing less symetric than WTC 7 in fact did, apart from the fact that the rubble pile of the building is almost as high as the rubble of the Nine Eleven buildings, the case smells from a fabrication. “Uuuh, another “conspiracy theory” from that guy”, some people might yell. I advise those people to watch the video about this collapse properly. Watching properly one can in all clearness see the explosions propping downwards before the collapse:

“But this was in Iran”, the “debunkers” would yell again. “So what?!”, would I answer. Don´t forget, last Summer former CIA_director_Morell, a staunch Clinton supporter, demanded to kill Russians and Iranians in covert operations on behalf of Russia´s and Iran´s support for Assad. Morell demanded that US involvements should not be able to be proven, but it should be clear to the respective governments where it came from. As for Russia they might have got “their part” with the plane_crash in December.

Was the building collapse the “Iranian Part”, “smashing several flies with one hand”? The case is very symbolic, on first sight already it resembles Nine Eleven: fire and a collapse following. Quite some skepticism on “official” Nine Eleven also came from Iranian media. The Iranian government would “understand”.

But the case could also serve for the “necessary debunking” of those many peoples conviction (inside and outside the US) that Nine Eleven was an “Inside Job”! Do we really believe that such operation would be impossible for those guys having demolished thousands of Iranian Uranium centrifuges? Well, that was a “remote control affair”, but I´m sure, that US “intelligence” and their allies have many agents “on the ground” in Iran. The Iranian government would even hesitate (though clearly understanding, and possibly there were Companies in the building to be connected to it) to accuse the US of this incident, because it would be perceived as a fundamental weakness of the regime in Teheran.

There is another point: in these transition times the “Deep State” of the US is more free than otherwise (one might think of how the “Bay of Pigs” came over Kennedy after his Inauguration). And the Neocons were very eager to increase pressure on Iran, they were even eager to attack Iran, partly pushed by Israel´s Power Elite. Clinton was part of those efforts. Trump in deed also wants to revise the treaty with Iran. On the other side he announced to stop “Regime Change” wars, which are an obsession of the Neocons, Iran is in fact the last point on their “Hit List”, according to Wesley Clarke (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eo6u9DpASp8 ). So here might be the chance for the Neocons to push him exactly into another of such wars, especially if Iran´s government would react on such a provocation by a covert operation against the US in revenge.

And it could also be a demonstration of strength towards those critical people being able to think: “it´s clearly to be seen, but you better shut up! Otherwise we smash you!” (socially, economically or even physically).

Qui Bono?

Again: The explosion clouds show it was not just a fire that brought the building down!

If an event is of great advantage for someone, moreover in many different aspects, the question arises whether those ones benefitting from it have staged that event, one calls that possible motives. The next question is whether those people have the ability to do it. Who might really doubt that?! The remaining part: the proofs! It is characteristic of such covert operations that we, the resisting part of the population hardly have the chance to get them, but I claim to have the right to speculate on basis of the first two aspects of the Story.

Ok, one can not be sure of this interpretation, just as how Morell demanded!