Nigerian Army rejects grounds for war crimes probe

AFP

Amnesty International named six serving or retired Nigerian army officers whom it said should be probed to establish whether they were responsible for murder, torture and disappearances. By STEFAN HEUNIS (AFP/File)

Lagos (AFP) - Nigeria's military has rejected a call for senior army officers to be investigated for possible war crimes in the fight against Boko Haram Islamists.

Amnesty International named six serving or retired army officers whom it said should be probed to establish whether they were responsible for murder, torture and disappearances.

It alleged that more than 1,200 people had been extra-judicially killed and thousands more arbitrarily arrested during the bloody, eight-year conflict.

But the army's chief of civilian-military affairs, Major General Nuhu Angbazo, said there was "no evidence" against any of the commanders named in Amnesty's report.

Angbazo told reporters in Abuja on Wednesday that the findings were contained in the report of a board of inquiry set up to look into the claims.

That report has not been published in full.

Amnesty's allegations were contained in a 133-page report "Stars on their Shoulders. Blood on their Hands", published in June 2015.

Similar allegations made in the past have typically been dismissed but President Muhammadu Buhari, who was just one month into office at the time, vowed to look into the claims.

Separate claims from Human Rights Watch of extra-judicial killings, rape and sexual coercion at camps for those displaced by the conflict were also dismissed in the report.

So, too, were Amnesty claims that Nigeria's security forces had killed at least 150 pro-Biafra protesters and injured hundreds more since August 2015 in the southeast.

Angbazo said the board had raised concerns about several issues relating to the Boko Haram insurgency, including the processing of detainees and overcrowding at military jails.

"The current delay in the trials of Boko Haram detainees resulting in some cases in deaths in custody is unacceptable and a denial of the rights of fair trial," he added.

Lack of access to legal representation or visits from legal practitioners was a "violation of human rights", he said, adding the board had recommended improvements.