EscoLehGo

These movies are funny but super overrated and I'm glad they're bringing it to a close. What's ironic is that the three main actors Zach, Ed and Bradley are all brilliant independently (Ed and Zach comically, Bradley dramatically) but when put together in this series they come off as a notch above mediocre. At least it doesn't look like they'll get roofied this time like the first two movies and you can never lose with John Goodman, especially as a villain.

The Yokel

I hate that they're calling it a trilogy like that was the idea all along. It wasn't. We're not imbeciles. The first movie made money so they decided to make the second one. Then they decided to make a third one for the same reason and hype it even more like some kind of conclusion. It makes no sense.

geobst

I watched this on Friday and personally loved it, although there's a lot of mixed criticism both professional and unprofessional.

Anybody who has not seen it but plans to, stay at the cinema (presuming you'll be good and see it on the big screen) for five minutes after the credits. There's a 2-3 minute scene which you have to see. I won't give what happens away, but I urge anybody who sees the movies to wait and see the 2-3 minute scene.

Rudy

Anybody who has not seen it but plans to, stay at the cinema (presuming you'll be good and see it on the big screen) for five minutes after the credits. There's a 2-3 minute scene which you have to see. I won't give what happens away, but I urge anybody who sees the movies to wait and see the 2-3 minute scene.

I read about this in a review, and I stayed intentionally when the credits rolled while people were flocking out, and dayuuuuumn, what can I say! It was awesome.

Anyway, Jeffrey Tambor must have an amazing agent. He's in this film for 90 seconds which is about 30 seconds longer than he was in part 2 and still manages to get 5th billing in the opening credits. Well-played. I was suprised by how much I really enjoyed it. I knew this wouldn't offer much crapfest as the second part, and hopefully it didn't. Once you ignore the fact that there's no way Phil and Stu would hang out with someone as crazy, selfish, and self-absorbed as Alan, especially with what he's pulled. Fun movie.

geobst

You've got to think about the circumstances with their 'friendship'. It's not like they'd hang around with him if they had the choice because of like you said, what he's done in the past (past movies, etc.). The first twenty minutes of this instalment explain the reasons more than in the other instalments of the trilogy in my opinion.