This is based on Lee's message from last time.
1/ It refers to
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/earl
for the test result format.
Is that still current?
2/ Looking at the summary
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/summary.html
dated Nov 2011 - is this current?
3/ License
Greg - can I encourage you to put a LICENSE file in the project
https://github.com/kasei/SPARQL-1.1-Implementation-Report
and a copyright/licnese hearder on SPARQLReport.pm ?
Andy
---------------------
SPARQL-WG is finalizing the test suite for SPARQL 1.1 The group's hope
is that the test suite will serve multiple purposes:
+ Provide a basis for testing new and existing SPARQL implementations to
promote interoperability
+ Aid implementers in determining the expected behaviour of various
constructs in the language
SPARQL-WG will also use reports as the basis for generating an
implementation report for SPARQL.
We ask implementers to attempt to run the test suite and report results
to the working group.
Materials::
A README describes the vocabularies used to describe and structure of
the SPARQL 1.1 tests in manifest files:
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html
This is an incremental update on the test framework used for SPARQL 1.0,
adding testing mechanism for update, entailment and federated query.
An overview page provides a human-readable description of the approved
tests, as well as links to archives of the collected test materials for
download:
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/summary.html
The implementation report will look like:
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/
and is based on the EARL vocabulary to report results of running tests
against an implementation. (EARL is an RDF schema for reporting test
results produced by the W3C Evaluation and Repair Tools working group.)
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/earl
While we'd appreciate it if implementers could report results in this
EARL format, we'd be glad to receive implementation reports in other
formats as well.
Please direct questions about the test suite to the working group
comments mailing list public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org. Test results can
be sent to the list as well.
Thanks,
whoever sends it
on behalf of SPARQL-WG