A basic definition of Equality is the ability to decide on your attire, having the freedom (and the laws to protect your freedom) for wear it, or not.
As such this is strictly an individual choice, not to be undermined, manipulated or interfered by the state under any circumstances; not in the name of so called "Secularism" or religion or....
Austria's fascistic tendencies comes into sharp relief when once more, when people are criminalized because of their looks. Freud's observations on Vienna's anti semitic tendencies are not to be forgotten.
There are only about a hundred fully covered Muslim women in the entire nation of Austria, are these hundred or so women a real "security threat" or are the Austrians, deep down, still a bunch of unrepentant Nazis?

How free are you in Iran the land of religious persecution, the land of intolerance, you can talk about your definition of equality all you want, under islam women are nothing more than sexual objects to be used and abused as seen fit by the men.

The question is how free are you, living in countries that profile you based on your racial and ethnic background, consistently and systematically violating your civil rights, just because you were born in a different land?
How about objectification of women by "Playboy" types of culture. Do you think turning women into mere sexual object, as popularized by Hefner and...., was liberating?
Why are you so ignorant and uneducated when it comes to the actual circumstances in the West?
And that English. Are you still taking ESL classes?!
The last thing you want to do on earth is to give Ahmad Kasravy a meaningless, obtuse, totally incoherent, one line 'lecture' on Islam. Religions. like all other social phenomenons are multifaceted, complex social constructions. You consistently side with the current wave of Western Islamophobia because it serves your political agenda. Just like how reza shah and his son sided with his Western against Iranian people.
FYI Islam in Andalusia was the most tolerant, liberal, advanced culture of its time.
But you can't comprehend or admit to that since your agenda is all about intolerance and reducing the exchange to the most crass, ignorant, simple minded level.
And also don't forget how shah and Navab worked hand in hand to kill Ahmad Kasravy.

As I have also said before, I do not fear islam, I detest islam and its founder, I see islam as a death cult, not the worship of the holy spirit of God, but worship of Satan, l wont comment on your english, but look in the mirror

You consistently spread one-sided, stereotypical notions of Islam that are completely in line with the current Islamophobic crusade in the West.
You spread fear and hate about Islam, which is a lot worse than just 'fearing' Islam, not to mention how it is also criminal to a certain extent, since deep down it is nothing but hate mongering.
I am looking at the mirror, and this exchange and I still haven't heard your acknowledgement of Andalusia or the other thousand and one complexities of Islam. Hence your 'argument' and your English both remain crass, utterly ignorant and simple minded.
Now you look in the mirror and tell us what you see about shah's cooperation with Navab in the cowardly assassination of Ahmad Kasravy.