CIA kept RFK apprised of Castro assassination plotting

In June 1964, Bobby Kennedy was grieving, guilt ridden and getting ready to leave his job as attorney general when he received a faintly ominous memo from the CIA. Written by Deputy Director Richard Helms, a man he did not trust, the four-page missive concerned a subject he did not care to think about: assassination.

Seven months before, the 39-year-old RFK had lost his brother and his political power in a burst of gunfire in Dallas. Under President Lyndon Johnson, Helms, a canny 51-year-old spymaster, had kept his job despite the fact that the CIA had been following accused assassin Lee Oswald for four years.

Helms’s memo, entitled “Plans of Cuban Exiles to Assassinate Selected Cuban Government Leaders,” reminded RFK that he had dabbled in the killing business before his brother’s murder and could not escape it even as he prepared to leave the government.

The Helms memo, first posted on the JFK Library website, sheds light on an enduring question of the Kennedy presidency: What did JFK and RFK know about the CIA’s plans to assassinate Fidel Castro in 1963?

There is no single piece of paper that proves they did. RFK biographer David Talbot and some Kennedy admirers contend the CIA was acting on its own and out of control. Defenders of the agency, as well as RFK critic Joan Mellen, say that the Kennedys’ outspoken desire to get rid of Castro was a clear signal that any means would be acceptable, including assassination. According to a 1974 memo, first made public in 1998, Secretary of State Henry Kissinger told Vice President Gerald Ford that Helms had told him that “Robert Kennedy personally managed the operation on the assassination of Castro.”

The June 10 memo doesn’t resolve the question about what RFK knew before November 22, 1963, but it shows that the CIA did keep RFK apprised of one not very promising plan to kill Castro after JFK was dead.

Shadowed by assassination

The memo illuminates the tragic dilemma that RFK faced after his brother’s murder. As a hardliner on Cuba, Bobby Kennedy had conscripted Helms and the CIA in his behind-the-scene efforts to overthrow Castro. But when his brother was murdered, allegedly by a Castro supporter, Bobby suspected a right-wing double cross, and never gave any credence to the “Castro Did It” theory.

As RFK’s son, Robert Kennedy Jr., stated publicly in Dallas earlier this year, his father never believed the official story of a lone gunman. In his 2008 bestseller “Brothers,” David Talbot documented how Bobby told his closest confidantes that he suspected that anti-Castro exiles and organized crime figures, possibly in league with rogue CIA officers, were responsible for his JFK’s death.

Yet what could he do? RFK underlined key passages of the June 10, 1964, memo with a blue pen, each of which underscored his powerlessness.

RFK noted Helms’s observation that the would-be assassins in contact with the CIA “were motivated in part by the belief that by disclosing the information they would obtain immunity against legal action” and that “the Mafia was involved.”

Helms’s bureaucratically correct message, ostensibly warning RFK about a potential problem, also signaled that the CIA was no longer under his sway. Two years before, in May 1962, an angry RFK had ordered the agency to stop using Mafia figures in its efforts to kill Castro. Now Helms was letting him know that the CIA no longer felt obliged to comply with his wishes, while reminding him that, as attorney general, he might be vulnerable to blackmail by the CIA’s gangster allies .

“They have offered to assassinate Castro for $150,000,” Bobby noted in the memo. That was the exact price tag for the CIA-Mafia assassination plot that had angered Bobby in May 1962.

Richard Helms, the gentlemanly planner of assassinations.

RFK also underscored a passage reporting “an unidentified group which would be willing to assassinate selected Cuban officials for cash.” That was an idea that he and his brother had entertained and rejected. The CIA was still pursuing it.

RFK did not bother to underline Helms’s unctuous and unconvincing claim that “Agency officers made clear… that the United States government would not, under any circumstances, condone the planned actions.”

RFK knew better than anyone that Helms had condoned multiple assassination plots by organized crime figures and others against Castro. In the words of his biographer Thomas Powers, Helms was “the gentlemanly planner of assassinations.”

It is no coincidence that RFK was reading classical scholar Edith Hamilton’s translation of the Greek tragedy Agamemnon, written by Aeschylus, around the time he received this memo. He memorized one line that captured the punishing truth he had to live with each day about his brother’s death. It was a line he would recite on April 4, 1968, when commenting on the assassination of Martin Luther King.

“In our sleep, pain which cannot forget falls drop by drop upon the heart until, in our own despair, against our will, comes wisdom through the awful grace of God,”

On November 22, 1963, RFK learned that dabbling in political assassination was a dangerous business for amateurs. On June 10, 1964, a professional reminded him of this hard truth.

16 comments

Somewhere I read that, after 11/22, RFK said he realized that “my world was not the real world,” or words to that effect. I forget what the context was but those words would seem to fit the context you have described here.

Talbot seems to implicate “rogue CIA agents” as being behind JFK’s assassination. But from what I have read so far, and I’ve even read Powers’ book about Helms: “The Man Who Kept the Secrets” (it is a bit of a whitewash btw), I am convinced that top level people at CIA, plus the Joint Chiefs, FBI director Hoover, and LBJ, were all in on the planning and cover up of the assassination. It wasn’t just “rogues” and it certainly wasn’t just mafia, although I think they were employed in the operation. Robert Kennedy was set up by Helms with respect to the assassination plots against Castro after JFK’s assassination, to keep him compromised and quiet. It’s similar to the set up that JFK was almost brought into over the Bay of Pigs, by his initially signing onto that operation. JFK made an abrupt turn around once CIA told him he needed to involve the US Navy to save the first tier of invaders, who were clearly out gunned by Castro’s forces in the air and on land. President Kennedy said he had been set up, and saw through the CIA’s attempt to frame him. Robert Kennedy probably saw through Helms’ attempt too, but was effectively out of power by 1964, unable to counter CIA.
Coupled with sexual blackmail that Hoover and LBJ had on the Attorney General, this CIA assassination plot record trump card of Helms put RFK into a weak position. He had no choice but to leave the cabinet and try to build a new Kennedy power base on his own. CIA wasn’t going to let him become president however, and I think they planned the hit on him in Los Angeles, in 1968. Joannides was probably involved in some way, and because of this, CIA won’t release any documents related to him until hell freezes over—or until the American people raise such a huge uproar that they have to come clean and fess up to their domestic assassinations crimes.

I would like to add one more thing: When Richard Nixon brought up the “Bay of Pigs thing” in the Watergate tapes, I think he was using that as a term for CIA blackmail (or RMN’s attempt to blackmail CIA if they tried to mess with him) with regard to his being able to hold onto his presidency as the revelations of corruption began to mount on Capitol Hill. “The Bay of Pigs thing” is what happened to RFK too, with respect to his being involved in anti-Castro assassination plots from 1961-62.

“Helms’s bureaucratically correct message, ostensibly warning RFK about a potential problem, also signaled that the CIA was no longer under his sway” Was it ever under his sway?

Put another way, who amongst us thinks the CIA would have stopped Cuban operations at the Kennedy’s command after the Bay of Pigs. Indeed, during the Bay of Pigs they were never under any Kennedy’s sway whatsoever: As Daniel Schorr reported from the conference of Cuban, Russian and US historians on NPR in 2001, the CIA’s actions during the Bay of Pigs represented “a CIA operation against President Kennedy” . Knowing this and knowing the ongoing Kennedy tumultuousness with CIA, what other opportunity did they have to monitor CIA operations against Cuba other than Mongoose? That question needs to be answered before pointing to charts showing that the CIA was “under” presidential control.

Fascinating documents that can be interpreted a number of different ways. It can be taken as a heads up on Intel not involving Operation 40 or ZR/RIFLE operatives that Helms wants RFK to know about taking place on US soil & involving Mafia figures just in case RFK wants to look into it. It’s going to cost him granting some immunity to learn more. It also seems to leave the door open for RFK to finance the group if he wants revenge on Castro. It can also appear as a taunt to RFK along the lines of, ‘Hey, Bobby, the animals that murdered your brother are looking to pull in some more coin on knocking off your old buddy, Fidel if you are interested’ (something along those lines.
I noticed Bobby underlined some of the names of the alleged anti-Castro kill team, perhaps he knew those names?

While waiting for experts to give their spin on what this spy vs. spy paper trail means novices like myself can’t help wonder just how many anti-Castro kill teams were floating around & if any of them ever got close enough to Castro to ambush him in some manner that was not publicized.

It’s been insinuated that JFK was funding anti-Castro killers by running funds to Sam Giancana via Judith Campbell but I haven’t seen any proof of it. If that were the case, I imagine this memo insulted the hell out of RFK in a number of ways.

If I recall, the book “Legacy of Secrecy” makes much of this angle, both in terms of the implicit blackmail by Helms on RFK that stopped him from investigating his brother’s murder, and also with regard to the connection between the murders of JFK, RFK and MLK.

Seeing how casually these amoral people assassinated foreign leaders, why would anyone think they would have any qualms about murdering US leaders? A lot of doubts about conspiracy have behind them doubts that American ” gangsters” would kill American leaders. But that assumes they have consciences in the first place. Clearly they saw the world as a chess game and the individual pieces were immaterial.

All reserachers seem to have conflicting views on who knew what and when, what peoples motivations were, and what people really meant when they did and said certain things.

It seems that JFK’s relationship with the Military and Intelligence departments had completely broken down to a point where it was a unhealthy situation for the country.

Even in times of national crisis they all seemed to be manouvering and plotting against each other.

I feel that the Military and Intelligence sections felt that they were responsible for the security of the country, and whoever was in the white house was irrelevant to them.

Interesting and surprising to hear senior figures say recently that the recent events in Egypt were the result of the military “restoring democracy”. I wonder if the perpetrators of the JFK assassination, in their twisted logic, felt they were doing the same.

I’m sorry, but I see no notation or signature indicating that Robert Kennedy ever saw or read the memo reproduced here, addressed as it was to the DCI.

Nor do I see any evidence, let alone proof, for the brazen assertion that either of the Kennedys knew anything about continuing CIA attempts to assassinate Castro.

To suggest otherwise is to traffick in CIA fictions contrived to absolve Langley for what it pursued despite Presidential orders, not because of them. One wonders which is more pathetic; those who propagate such self-evidently baseless nonsense, or those who believe it.

Kissinger said that Ford said that Helms said that Kennedy was the guilty party. My goodness, with a chain of evidence that sturdy, repeated in each case by men of proven integrity, how can anyone remain unconvinced?

I’m a bit stunned to see so astute a writer exhibit such rank gullibility.

It’s poor form to require any evidence that the Kennedy’s knew about certain things just as it is to require any more than a “misreading” of an oral history by a prominent “historian” to believe the Alford fairy tale.

It is only alternatives to the wcr that require any supporting evidence . And nothing short of 9 signed confessions witnessed by the pope, 10 smoking guns and talking parrot in a pear tree will suffice here.

Thank you RCD. This lie has been around so long that it just gets recycled and otherwise intelligent people continue to believe it. It’s insulting to called a Kennedy groupie just because you don’t accepts the CIA’s propaganda that the Kennedy’s were out to kill Castro.

I read somewhere, that there was apparently an assassination attempt on castro the same day as jfk was killed. Booby was waiting for that call- but got one for his bro instead? Any input would b greatly appreciated. Thx! Wink!

To Trish:
No there was no plot to kill Castro on 11-22-63. However on that date CIA agent Nestor Sanchez was in Paris to deliver to supposed Cuban dissident Rolando Cubela a pen filled with poison with which he could assassinate Castro. Earlier Cubela had been assured by Desmond Fitzgerald (who used the fake name James Clark) and was the number three man in the CIA that Cubela’s plans to kill Castro were supported at the highest level of the US government. Now it has been well established that Cubela was a double agent reporting back to Fidel. So, rightly or wrongly, Castro had adequate ground to believe that the Kennedys had personally approved the continuning US plans to kill him. Does that mean Castro was indeed behind the assassination? No but it certainly provided him wuth the strongest possible motivation: preservation of his own life!

This paper was found in RFK’s papers. But this memo was for McCone. McCone, apparently gave it to RFK. As RFK had asked McCone about the CIA’s involvement in the assassination, it seems possible McCone himself provided this memo to RFK, to keep him in the loop as to any developments, and prepare him should any of these characters pull off the assassination of Castro and want “immunity.’

To my old friend RCD, now how can you deny that RFK was privy to the plots when Helms told Kissinger that RFK was masterminding them? I mean, if we cannot believe Helms on this. who can we believe? There are several data. You and others no doubt recall that RFK was briefed on the Mafia plots when he demanded to know why the CIA continued to block prosecution of Maheu for the Rowan bugging. He expressed surprise and disgust but he did not ewxpressly order termination of the relationship. And an article in the Nation (I can’t access it now) “The Old Man on the CIA” disclosed that RFK sat in on a meeting which discussed a plan to kill Castro when he visited the Hemingway estate in Cuba. Finally, we know that RFK had a telephone call with Desmond Fitzgerald shortly before Fitzgerald was scheduled to fly to Paris to assure Rolando Cubela that RFK supported his plan to kill Castro. So we know for sure that RFK learned of the Mafia plots in 1962 and I am aware of no evidence that he ever followed through to ensure those plots had terminated. (RFK did of course order Harvey to cease any intervention in Cuba during the CMC.)

And LBJ was running Murder, Inc. down in Texas and he was not gentlemanly about it. See Billie Sol Estes for that. And this:

Robert Caro describes the LBJ-RFK relationship post 1960 Democratic convention, where RFK had moved heaven and earth attempting to keep LBJ off the 1960 Democratic ticket. Caro:

John Connally, who during long days of conversation with this author was willing to answer almost any question put to him, no matter how delicate the topic, wouldn’t answer when asked what Johnson said about Robert Kennedy. When the author pressed him, he finally said flatly: “I am not going to tell you what he said about him.” During the months after the convention, when Johnson was closeted alone back in Texas with an old ally he would sometimes be asked about Robert Kennedy. He would reply with a gesture. Raising his big right hand, he would draw the side of it across the neck in a slowing, slitting movement. Sometimes that gesture would be his only reply; sometimes, as during a meeting with Ed Clark in Austin, he would say, as his hand moved across his neck, “I’ll cut his throat if it’s the last thing I do.” [Robert Caro, "The Passage of Power," p. 140]

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name*

Email*

Website

In seeking to expand the range of informed debate about the events of 1963 and its aftermath,
JFKFacts.org welcomes comments that are factual, engaging, and civil. more

Comment

Buy it now; ‘Our Man in Mexico’

You can't understand JFK's assassination without understanding the role of the CIA and you can't understand the role of the CIA without reading Our Man in Mexico, Jefferson Morley’s critically-acclaimed biography of Winston Scott, chief of the CIA's Mexico City station in 1963.

When Scott wrote a memoir refuting a key claim of the Warren Commission, the CIA's response was swift and harsh.

Your JFK Questions Answered

Our Mission

The assassination of President Kennedy endures as a decisive moment for the American people, when national security agencies consolidated their secret power and the American people lost faith in their government.

JFK Facts is dedicated to answering the questions, "What happened on November 22, 1963?" and "What is the meaning of the JFK story today?"

Our mission is historical truth. Our method is accountability. To secure both, we are committed to forcing disclosure of thousands of still-secret JFK records by October 2017. Want to know more? Click here.)

Editor

The site is run by Jefferson Morley, a former Washington Post reporter and author of Our Man In Mexico, which tells the story of what one senior CIA official really thought about JFK's murder.

Quotable

William Attwood: ‘If the CIA did find out what we were doing…’ “If the CIA did find out what we were doing , this would have trickled down to the lower echelon of activists, and Cuban exiles, and the more gung-ho CIA people…..they might have been impelled to take violent action. Such as assassinating the President.” – former UN Ambassador William Attwood.