Even Trump Can’t Stop the Tide of Green Jobs

Email this article to a friend

Unlike traditional manufacturing jobs, green jobs in the clean energy industry have been on a steady upward swing. (AdamChandler86/ Flickr)

Donald Trump was elected in November on a platform that included both climate denial and the promise of jobs for Rust Belt communities still hurting from deindustrialization. In the months since, his strategy to create jobs has become increasingly clear: tax breaks and public shaming of companies planning to move their operations out of the country.

Take the case of Carrier, a manufacturing plant in Indianapolis that produces air conditioners. Trump first threatened to slap tariffs on Carrier’s imports after the company announced it would move a plant to Mexico. Then, he reportedly called Greg Hayes, CEO of the parent company United Technologies, who agreed to keep the plant in the United States in exchange for $7 million in tax breaks. (Carrier later admitted that only a portion of the plant’s jobs would remain in the country.)

The company’s decision to keep jobs in the United States was declared a victory for the Trump PR machine, but it’s unclear that it can create a major change in access to jobs in the long-term. Hayes, announcing that the tax breaks would allow additional investment into the plant, noted that the surge of money would go towards automation. And with automation, eventually, comes a loss of jobs.

“Automation means less people,” Hayes told CNN. “I think we’ll have a reduction of workforce at some point in time once they get all the automation in and up and running.”

Unlike traditional manufacturing jobs, green jobs in the clean energy industry have been on a steady upward swing. This past spring, for example, U.S. jobs in solar energy overtook those in oil and natural gas, and a Rockefeller Foundation-Deutsche Bank Climate Change Advisors study found that energy retrofitting buildings in the United States could create more than 3 million “job years” of employment.

That means green jobs remain one of the key hopes for revitalizing communities. But can they move forward under a climate-skeptic and coal-loving president?

Green jobs today

The Obama administration, for the most part, was a strong supporter of clean technology. In 2008, Obama wrangled tax credits for businesses that invest in wind and solar, which were extended in 2015 through 2020. The solar sector in particular saw huge growth. It grew 17 times faster than the overall economy in 2016, according to the National Solar Jobs Census, buoyed in large part by the 2009 stimulus funds that invested in solar energy.

Trump, meanwhile, has promised to place his investment in coal and oil jobs, as well as dismantle the Clean Power Plan that aimed to take on global warming by setting a limit on carbon dioxide pollution. The president has also declared an all-out war on regulation that encompasses rules designed to promote energy efficiency, a step that many see as the first volley in a war against green jobs.

Joe Uehlein, founding president of the Labor Network for Sustainability, which seeks to bridge the divide between labor and the climate movement, says that Trump can’t singlehandedly stop the move toward wind, solar and geothermal.

“That train left the station 10-15 years ago and it’s growing at pretty high speed right now,” says Uehlein. “That’s going to continue.”

One key reason that Uehlein and other analysts are still guardedly optimistic is that so much green energy growth happens at the state level. A December 2016 study by the Brookings Institute concluded that with little to no future buy-in from the federal government, states and localities would become increasingly important in turning the economy toward green jobs.

Uehlein says he’s already seen that happen successfully at the state level and that it’s creating good, unionized jobs. He points towards the country’s largest offshore wind farm that was approved in January 2017 and will help New York state get 50 percent of its power from renewables by 2030.

“Labor and the environmental community worked with offshore wind companies and made this happen,” he says, “and it’s the action at state and local levels that is driving this, even under Democratic administrations who have been far better about the environment.”

That reality could be complicated by red states with ideologies that steer them away from investments in environmentally friendly policies. For example, Indiana, Vice President Mike Pence’s home state, in 2015 attempted to add extra charges to the bills of people using solar energy. Tennessee’s bright sunshine hasn’t been captured by much solar power in large part because the state doesn’t have a renewable portfolio standard mandate that encourages utilities to use green power, as many other states that have benefitted from green energy do. Florida, meanwhile, banned the use of the term “climate change” in government communications, emails or reports.

But that doesn’t change that the interest in green jobs from voters is mostly bipartisan. Several polls in the last six months of Republican voters, many of whom backed Trump, have found support for renewable energy.

Dr. Daniel Kammen, director of the Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory at the University of Berkley, created the U.S. green jobs model to understand the future of the green energy industry through to 2030. The study found that green energy could create millions of jobs.

“It’s a pretty simple call the Trump team will need to make. Do they hang on to the technologies of the past,” Kammen asks, “or do you get more jobs by investing in these new technologies?”

An existential threat to the environment and labor

While the green jobs industry may still grow, Trump’s presidency has created a broader existential crisis both for labor and the environment.

In a report released after his election, the Labor Network for Sustainability put forward a plan called “How Labor and Climate United Can Trump Trump,” addressing the fears that Trump would accelerate the march towards cataclysmic climate change and, in the process, bring about right-to-work laws at the federal level that would spell doom for unions.

Uehlein says that many unions have an “all of the above” policy that supports work in all forms of energy, not only wind and solar but also oil and gas and coal. That is a “recipe for climate disaster,” he says.

Instead, Uehlein argues that labor and environmental groups must put together an alternative agenda around jobs and transitioning to a clean economy, develop a stronger alliance, target Trump’s base to convince them of the troubling nature of his agenda for both labor and the environment and commit to working through the inevitable tensions that will arise, like those presented by the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines.

Most importantly, the report notes, labor can’t support the parts of Trump’s agenda that it finds helpful, and ignore those that are harmful. Climate groups, meanwhile, can’t ignore the economic realities of the communities that voted for Trump.

The report makes its case: “If the climate protection movement wants to have a future, it will have to find a way to appeal to the alienated Trump voters that not only gives lip service to their interests but actually wins them over.” Labor, meanwhile must “use good, stable jobs protecting the climate to challenge the growing inequality and injustice of our society.”

Yana Kunichoff is a Chicago-based investigative journalist and documentary producer. Her work has appeared in the Guardian, Pacific Standard and the Chicago Reader, among others. She can be reached at yanakunichoff at gmail.com.

I have made 104,000 thousand dollars previous year by doing an on-line job a­n­d I did that by w­o­r­k­i­n­g in my own time f­o­r several h on daily basis. I’m using work model I found online and I am so happy that i was able to make so much extra income. It's user friendly a­n­d I'm so blessed that i found this. This is what i do... http://s­.­id/2hh

Posted by richard-savage@mail.ru on 2017-03-10 23:41:16

I have profited 104000 bucks in 2016 by freelancing from home a­­n­­d I did it by work­ing in my own time f­­o­­r 3+ hours /day. I was following work model I stumbled upon online and I am excited that i made so much extra income. It's newbie friendly a­­n­­d I am just so blessed that I found out about this. Here’s what I do... http://www.wzurl­.­me/IbRCyQ

Posted by myrtle.amidon@mail.ru on 2017-03-07 04:00:27

I was paid 104 thousand dollars in last twelve months by working online from home and I was able to do it by wor­king part time for 3 or sometimes more hours every day. I used work opportunity I came across online and I am amazed that i made so much extra income. It's beginner friendly a­­n­­d I'm so happy that i discovered it. Here’s what I did... TYN.EE/7ex

Posted by Jimmie Perry on 2017-03-04 23:19:09

I've made 104 thousand dollars in last 12 months by doing an on-line job and I did it by work­ing part-time for 3 or sometimes more hrs /daily. I used work model I came across online and I am so happy that I was able to earn so much money on the side. It's really beginner-friendly and I'm just so happy that I found out about it. Here is what i do... EASYURL.NET/9861f

Posted by Benjamin Marshall on 2017-03-03 01:10:19

I think a more useful view on "green-vs.-fossil" jobs would be to re-state in terms of (pick your unit: joules, ergs, kilocalories, etc.) energy per job per annum. An industry that employs masses to produce relatively little product is not a competitive winner in the long run.

Posted by Asterix on 2017-03-02 12:35:32

I was paid 104 thousand dollars in 2016 by doing an on-line job at my house a­­n­­d I did that by w­orking in my own time f­o­r 3+ hours every day. I’m using an earning model I stumbled upon online and I am happy that i was able to make so much money. It's very user-friendly a­n­d I'm just so happy that I found out about this. Check out what I did... EASYURL.NET/f2265

Posted by brian.robinson.94@mail.ru on 2017-03-02 04:55:48

We shall see if they continue. Especially when the government money dries up.

But keep posting your stupidity using a device that is made with, transported to you by and powered by fossil fuels you hypocritical fucks

Posted by Chris Doving on 2017-03-01 08:30:18

I got paid $104000 previous year by working online from home a­n­d I did it by w­orking part-time for several h on daily basis. I followed a money making opportunity I was introduced by this web-site i found online and I am so thrilled that I was able to earn such great money. It's really newbie-friendly a­­n­­d I'm just so happy that i found it. Check out what I do... TWITTER.COM/StinnettMargar1/status/836198198980988928

Posted by John N. James on 2017-02-28 00:58:00

What you call subsidies every business man calls tax deductions. What I'm talking about that the "green" companies get is the equivalent of the government paying me for about 1/3 of the gas I use for personal use. And as to destroying the planet, why don't you quit using any electricity that is not "green" and quit using anything transported by equipment that uses petroleum fuel?

Posted by BH on 2017-02-27 20:58:03

Oh yeah, let's forget about the $40 billion or so in tax subsidies to the oil industry every year, huh? Sheesh, what a bunch of sheep You pay your high taxes to support one of the most lucrative industries on the planet while that industry destroys so much of the environment that it can't effectively be measured ! ! !

Posted by C.A. Cooper on 2017-02-27 19:08:37

I guess all those "green" companies who took all those loans and went belly up taking the tax payer money with them suddenly came back to life. Solyndra ($535 million), Abound Solar ($400 million), Range Fuels ($80 million), the list goes on and on and on......

Posted by Rayzor442 on 2017-02-27 17:39:08

Oh, I'm not talking about normal business tax deductions, like all businesses get. I'm talking about the tax breaks consumers get to buy their product. Libs have made a big issue of oil industry tax breaks when in fact they are no different than other industries, it's just their equipment cost more than what I have to buy for my business.

Posted by BH on 2017-02-27 05:19:24

I was paid 104 thousand dollars in last twelve months by doing an on-line job a­­n­­d I was able to do it by wor­king in my own time f­­o­­r 3+ h every day. I was following an earning opportunity I stumbled upon from this website i found online and I am so excited that i made so much money on the side. It's really user-friendly a­n­d I'm so happy that i found this. This is what i did... TWITTER.COM/StinnettMargar1/status/836103151308529665

Posted by Anton Dunn on 2017-02-27 01:14:18

I wonder what the big oil industries would have done without the billions of tax credits.

Posted by Jonathan David Finch on 2017-02-26 22:28:08

The vast majority of solar panels are built in low wage non union factories and installed by minimum wage non union home renovation workers. Let's be HONEST about these "green jobs"

Posted by gregoryabutler on 2017-02-26 04:14:52

I've made $104,000 in last 12 months by working on-line from my house a­n­d I did it by wor­king part time f­­o­­r few hours each day. I followed work opportunity I found online and I am so thrilled that i was able to make so much money. It's so user-friendly a­­n­­d I'm just so happy that i found it. Here is what i did...TWITTER.COM/StinnettMargar1/status/835739136078163968

Posted by Harry Mitchell on 2017-02-26 03:46:14

I wonder what the "green" industries would have done without the major tax credits? And let's not forgot all of those wonderful companies run by Obama's campaign donors that he funneled money to.

Posted by BH on 2017-02-25 18:17:54

I've profited 104,000 bucks previous year by working from my home a­­n­­d I was able to do it by w­o­r­k­i­n­g in my own time f­o­r 3+ hours every day. I’m using a business model I came across online and I am thrilled that i made so much extra income. It's really user-friendly a­n­d I'm so thankful that i found this. Here’s what I did... please visit my account for webpage

Posted by Taylor Henry on 2017-02-24 00:06:45

I got paid 104000 dollars previous year by doing an on-line job from home a­n­d I manage to do it by wo­rking in my own time for 3 or sometimes more hrs daily. I followed a business model I came across from company that i found online and I am so thrilled that I was able to earn so much money on the side. It's newbie friendly a­­n­­d I'm so grateful that i found this. Here is what i do... please visit my account for webpage

Posted by Adam Marshall on 2017-02-23 02:24:18

About this Blog

"Working In These Times" is dedicated to providing independent and incisive coverage of the labor movement and the struggles of workers to obtain safe, healthy and just workplaces. more