Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Three days ago, the world marked the 10th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 attack.
It is good that the mastermind of this horrible massacre was killed and deprived of the opportunity to celebrate. It is bad that there are still plenty of other people eager to advance his cause. Because, unfortunately, the advocates of Grand Zero Mosque have not yielded to public pressure to build it somewhere else - anywhere else, - this post will be a blog action against Islamism. To honour also the beginning of academic year in Bulgarian schools tomorrow (Sept. 15), I have copied from the Faithfreedom site a text which should interest everybody having a touch with education. Let me warn Muslim readers that they are likely to be offended by the following text.

Your site brought tears of
joy to my eyes. It is so great to realize I am not alone!

I left Islam before your
site came into existence. I kid you not; I left Islam when I was 7 years old or
so! My apostasy was triggered by a very interesting incident.

Kids usually regard
textbooks as something sacred and believe every word it says. If an author says
that the French revolution is good (or bad), then most students will parrot it.
They won’t use their own brains.

My teacher wanted us to use
our brains and stop “worshipping” textbooks. She gave us an assignment to write
our own book. When we finished, she said that we could now publish it. Some kids
wrote that every parent has to buy an ice-cream every day, others wrote that
schools and education as a whole must be banned. Nobody could prevent us from
publishing our books. If we had released our masterpieces without mentioning our
ages, some people would have certainly believed every single word in our books.
If we had added the magic abbreviation “PhD” to our creations, many people would
have started worshipping it.

Then it suddenly occurred to
me that Mohammed, a man whom my parents named “a perfect man”, could have made
up the Koran! Why should I believe him? I can create my own religion and claim
that I’m the prophet of the only true God.

Since then I have never
named myself “a Muslimah”. When I became a big girl, I studied Islam thoroughly
and came to a conclusion that Islam is a load of crap. My parents left Islam
too. We all now are safe and sound in Paris.

I advise all Muslims to read
articles in this site. You don’t need to worship Ali Sina or believe him. He
could think out every accusation he has leveled at Mohammed. In my opinion, he
is just a man who studies Islam critically. If Ali Sina didn’t exist, Islam
would still be a load of crap. Friends, you have your own brains, so use them.
How could a prophet marry a 9-year-old girl? How could a prophet have more than
20 wives and concubines but at the same time command his followers to have only
4 wives? Isn’t it strange that God permitted Mohammed to have more than 4 wives?
Decide for yourself. Make your own investigation. AND USE YOUR BRAINS!

Today I believe in God. But,
I’m afraid, Mohammed had nothing to do with God.

Dear Ali Sina, I am very
happy that you exist! Yes, without you Islam would still be trash but it feels
so go(od) with you.

Tuesday, September 06, 2011

Undated photo of the late Caylee Anthony (copied from ABC News, originally provided by the Florida police).

"Caylee's law" is a draft considered by several US states that would make it a felony not to report to authorities the death or disappearence of a pre-teenage child within a short time. It is named after Caylee Marie Anthony (2005 - 2008) from Florida who disappeared shortly before her third birthday. Her skeleton, with duct tape on the facial skull, was found six months later in a swamp. Caylee's mother, Casey Anthony, did not report her daughter's disappearance, enjoyed endless parties, then lied to investigators that the child had been kidnapped by a nonexistent nanny. At her trial, the defense claimed that Caylee had drowned accidentally. The jurors acquitted Casey of murder, manslaughter and child abuse - of everything they could, so she was released only days after the trial. The purpose of Caylee's law is to prevent similar cases to be solved this way in the future.
Opponents to the proposed bill argue that laws voted emotionally in the aftermath of high-profile cases are known to have undesired consequences and that such a law, if enforced, will harm innocent people. Of course it will; most laws do it all the time. The real question to me is whether the pros outweigh the cons or, to put it more emotionally, whether America can afford not having such a law after Casey’s “not guilty” verdict.
I admit I fail to understand the meaning of reasonable doubt in Casey Anthony’s case. My head just whorls when I read the opinions of jurors and legal experts that the burden of proof was on prosecution and the prosecution did not produce enough evidence that Casey had killed her daughter. It seems that the jurors demanded the same amount of evidence as if the defendant had been a stranger to the victim. My opinion, however, is that there are some situations when the burden of proof is on you to prove that you are innocent, and this is when you have accepted certain responsibility beforehand. If you are appointed to guard some property or person and you fail to protect the guarded object, you will be expected to prove that you have done your best. And if you become a parent and accept your parental responsibility by bringing your child home, instead of giving her for adoption, you are to prove your innocence if something bad happens to her. Even if she suffers an accident, you still have to answer questions, because young children cannot protect themselves from accidents – this is the duty of their caregivers.
I think that any doubt in Casey Anthony’s guilt was unreasonable because I cannot imagine any reasonable hypothesis (except insanity) under which she could be not guilty. Let’s believe the defense that Caylee drowned accidentally and her panicked grandfather put duct tape on her face to make the accident look like murder (?!) and threw the body into the swamp. Well, wasn’t Casey obliged to protect her 2-year-old daughter from accidental drowning? Recently, a 1-year-old boy named Joseph drowned in the bath while his mother Shannon Johnson was facebooking. Although his death was undisputed accident, the mother was sentenced to 10 years. The judge told her, “(Joseph) was a human being that had a right to life. And you, as his mother, had a responsibility to make sure he got that chance. That was your responsibility.” I think this judge was right. I also think there are deep flaws in a system severely punishing a negligent mother who generally acts as a good citizen while allowing a negligent or (more likely) murderous mother to be rewarded with freedom for her lies.
Let me repeat – I agree with the opponents of Caylee’s law that it will be costly and will harm innocent parents. However, I fear that its absence may spell death for many young children, viewed by their parents as unwanted burden rather than joy. Seeing Casey Anthony acquitted and commentators praising the verdict as a victory for the US justice system, other people may be tempted to emulate her. Things are bad enough as they are. Opponents say Caylee’s murder is a single, isolated case. This not only makes me ask how many cases must happen before something is done – it is simply untrue. Unfortunately, when a child is murdered, parents are the first suspects, and in two-thirds of cases there is no need to look elsewhere.
If you disagree with me, I can only apologize for wasting your time. But if you agree with me and live in the USA, you can consider signing a petition for Caylee’s law. I cannot sign it myself because I am not an American. It is difficult even to explain why I still have so much interest in this country after my brother's family no longer lives there. Perhaps because I believe that in a world where nothing can undo the evils of the past, our only hope can be for a better future, and our deeds are the only way to make it come true.

About Me

My name is Maya Markova. This blog is my little corner where I write about things that interest me, in as politically incorrect style as I like. I do not claim to be clever, good, free of prejudice and bigotry, broad-minded, enlightened, polite, attractive or superior in any other way. This is not a science blog and I write here what I like, not what people think a "scientist" should write. I try not to bore my readers but of course I cannot guarantee that what I am writing will be interesting for you.