If Dos Republicas is able to mine substandard coal in Maverick County, it will be carried by train from the site in rural Maverick County through the center of Eagle Pass, Texas - Saturday, February 4, 2012
Jennifer Whitney

In what the leader of an environmental group said was a surprising and stunning blow to an effort to stop a Mexican company from mining coal on the border, an American Indian tribe has backed out of the fight.

The Eagle Pass-based Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas has officially withdrawn its opposition to a permit application filed by the Dos Republicas Coal Partnership, which seeks permission to mine low-grade coal from approximately 6,300 acres of land in the border town. The coal will not be used in Texas, however, but instead shipped to the Mexican state of Coahuila.

“That [withdrawal] hurt us really, really badly from all sorts of angles,” said George Baxter, the vice president of the Maverick County Environmental and Public Health Association, which opposes the project. “We lost their expert witnesses, the attorney who was the most dedicated of all opposition lawyers, and, of course, we lost their financial resources.”

Joining Baxter’s group in opposition are the city of Eagle Pass, the Maverick County Commissioners Court and the area public school and hospital districts. They charge that dust from the coal and discharge from the planned mine would pollute the air and water systems, and that blasting at the mine could lead to property damage. Officials with Dos Republicas have denied the accusations. As of last week, the opposition coalition had collected and turned over more than 6,500 petition signatures from Maverick County residents opposing the project to the Texas Railroad Commission, which will decide on the permit.

The commission’s hearing on the mine concluded this month after almost four weeks of testimony. Both sides have yet to submit written closing arguments to the commission, which is expected to issue a final decision this fall.

Until less than two weeks ago, the tribe and its lawyer, Elizabeth Berkhardt, were major players for the opposition. Berkhardt presented some of the hardest-hitting objections, which more than once led to heated verbal exchanges with hearing examiner Marcy Spraggins.

The abrupt exit has left Baxter wondering exactly what happened, and has fueled speculation in the border city as to why the tribe, which even offered an expert witness on air contamination but who never testified, would opt out.

“Some of the people from our association that know members of the tribal council to one degree or another are trying to find out,” Baxter said. “It was just a tremendous 180, and I don’t have any firm information over what caused them to do that.”

Dos Republicas spokesman Rudy Rodriguez said the tribe opted out after speaking directly with mine officials. Aside from communicating with Berkhardt during the hearing process, Rodriguez said the Kickapoo did not have additional knowledge about the proceedings.

“They toured the facilities in Mexico, the coal mine and what it would look on this side,” Rodriguez said. “And then they toured the site in Eagle Pass, and they were trying to get more informed on the project and what was taking place. They hadn’t been up to the hearings.”

Rodriguez instantly shot down any notion that the tribe had any financial incentive — specifically a land deal — to bring about the sudden change of heart.

“They are clearly on the other side of the county. I was always surprised as to why they were in opposition to begin with,” he said. “That was more surprising than them withdrawing.”

Asked if he knew how much the Kickapoo tribe had incurred in costs and whether that might have been a factor in its decision, Baxter said he could not speak to how the tribe was doing financially. He said, however, that it was the best-financed opponent in the coalition.

“All I know is that they have a lot more money than anybody else on this case,” he said. “The city is scraping along, the county is scraping along, and the environmental association, of course, is practically nothing in the way of financial resources. So we were really hoping they could carry the ball for us, but now that’s gone.”

Officials with Dos Republicas — which partners with North American Coal Corporation and subsidiary Camino Real Fuels, both based in Plano — have consistently fought off allegations that the project will hurt the community, saying it has and will continue to abide by environmental regulations and industry standards. The mine will also be a boon to the local economy, they argue.

During testimony in February, mining officials testified that the project would create about 40 office positions and a workforce of 100 to 200 people, with wages for mine workers potentially being as much as $24 an hour. Opponents say those numbers are inflated and being touted only to label opponents as anti-job growth in an economically disadvantaged swath of the border.

Baxter and his allies’ dwindling chances — which they consider long shots — are to submit written closing arguments to Spraggins by next month reiterating their opposition. The examiner will then have up to 60 days to turn over to the three-member commission a proposal for a decision. Both sides will then have one last chance to submit comments supporting or opposing the proposal.

Dos Republicas has also applied for a railroad permit application to construct a railway to facilitate the shipment of the coal, which may also be used to haul beer from the Cervecería Grupo Modelo brewery in Piedras Negras, the Mexican town just across the border. Baxter and his group have also publicly opposed that project because it will facilitate the mine, although Baxter now thinks the end goal of the mine project was to help usher in the rail line.

“I think it may well be that the mine is the adjunct to the railroad rather than the railroad being the adjunct to the mine,” he said. “You talk about a dream situation for certain activities: your own private railroad, your own private bridge and your own private property on both sides of the river to unload and load it.”

Texas Tribune donors or members may be quoted or mentioned in our stories, or may be the subject of them. For a complete list of contributors, click here.

Quality journalism doesn't come free

Perhaps it goes without saying — but producing quality journalism isn't cheap. At a time when newsroom resources and revenue across the country are declining, The Texas Tribune remains committed to sustaining our mission: creating a more engaged and informed Texas with every story we cover, every event we convene and every newsletter we send. As a nonprofit newsroom, we rely on members to help keep our stories free and our events open to the public. Do you value our journalism? Show us with your support.