We have two other speakers identified for the first session but we need confirmation they are attending. The case presenter from Canada can cover travel but has asked if registration would be applicable since the speaker will only attend for our sessions. The other one has not indicated any barriers to attending: I am awaiting an abstract.

The second session is a break out to discuss the cases. It is not closed but it is a working meeting to follow up on the first session.

Description: The Belmont Forum brings together 25 research funders from around the world to support transdisciplinary research to deliver the knowledge needed to address environmental challenges. All projects supported through the Belmont Forum have PIs and stakeholders from at least 3 countries and 3 different funders. The Belmont Forum e-Infrastructure and Data Management initiative is in the initial stages of determining how to implement the legal interoperability recommendations for data sharing in this context. The presentation will address the considerations, including an array of funder policies, sensitivity to indigenous knowledge and intellectual property rights, and adequate training to prepare the investigators to comply.

> On Aug 18, 2017, at 08:09, carrieseltzer@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hi Christoph,
>
> Thanks for updating. Here is a working title and very short description for the website:
>
> Title: Barriers to implementing legal interoperability principles for data in the context of multinational, multifunder, transdisciplinary projects
>
> Description: The Belmont Forum brings together 25 research funders from around the world to support transdisciplinary research to deliver the knowledge needed to address environmental challenges. All projects supported through the Belmont Forum have PIs and stakeholders from at least 3 countries and 3 different funders. The Belmont Forum e-Infrastructure and Data Management initiative is in the initial stages of determining how to implement the legal interoperability recommendations for data sharing in this context. The presentation will address the considerations, including an array of funder policies, sensitivity to indigenous knowledge and intellectual property rights, and adequate training to prepare the investigators to comply.
>
> Best,
>
> Carrie
>
> --
> Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/rdacodata-legal-interoperability-ig/po...
> Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
> Stop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/57324

Hi all,
I’m intermittently on internet as on vacation- just wanted to let you know i can provide a title and abstract next week.
Sorry for the delay!

Also - I probably cannot attend all of RDA, but would really like also to spend some social time before and/or after with all of you - can you let me know your schedules?

Best,
Melissa

On Aug 18, 2017, at 6:37 AM, Repositorian > wrote:

Dear Christoph and All,

We have two other speakers identified for the first session but we need confirmation they are attending. The case presenter from Canada can cover travel but has asked if registration would be applicable since the speaker will only attend for our sessions. The other one has not indicated any barriers to attending: I am awaiting an abstract.

The second session is a break out to discuss the cases. It is not closed but it is a working meeting to follow up on the first session.

> On Aug 18, 2017, at 08:09, carrieseltzer@gmail.com > wrote:
>
> Hi Christoph,
>
> Thanks for updating. Here is a working title and very short description for the website:
>
> Title: Barriers to implementing legal interoperability principles for data in the context of multinational, multifunder, transdisciplinary projects
>
> Description: The Belmont Forum brings together 25 research funders from around the world to support transdisciplinary research to deliver the knowledge needed to address environmental challenges. All projects supported through the Belmont Forum have PIs and stakeholders from at least 3 countries and 3 different funders. The Belmont Forum e-Infrastructure and Data Management initiative is in the initial stages of determining how to implement the legal interoperability recommendations for data sharing in this context. The presentation will address the considerations, including an array of funder policies, sensitivity to indigenous knowledge and intellectual property rights, and adequate training to prepare the investigators to comply.
>
> Best,
>
> Carrie
>
> --
> Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/rdacodata-legal-interoperability-ig/po...
> Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
> Stop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/57324

Description: The Belmont Forum brings together 25 research funders from around the world to support transdisciplinary research to deliver the knowledge needed to address environmental challenges. All projects supported through the Belmont Forum have PIs and stakeholders from at least 3 countries and 3 different funders. The Belmont Forum e-Infrastructure and Data Management initiative is in the initial stages of determining how to implement the legal interoperability recommendations for data sharing in this context. The presentation will address the considerations, including an array of funder policies, sensitivity to indigenous knowledge and intellectual property rights, and adequate training to prepare the investigators to comply.

Hi all,
Just making plans.. does anyone want to meet the evening beforehand? I will plan to arrive on the 18th and leave on the 20th, please let me know if I have missed anything in terms of scheduling ;-).

Cheers,
Melissa

On Aug 18, 2017, at 10:06 AM, mhaendel > wrote:

Hi all,
I’m intermittently on internet as on vacation- just wanted to let you know i can provide a title and abstract next week.
Sorry for the delay!

Also - I probably cannot attend all of RDA, but would really like also to spend some social time before and/or after with all of you - can you let me know your schedules?

Best,
Melissa

On Aug 18, 2017, at 6:37 AM, Repositorian > wrote:

Dear Christoph and All,

We have two other speakers identified for the first session but we need confirmation they are attending. The case presenter from Canada can cover travel but has asked if registration would be applicable since the speaker will only attend for our sessions. The other one has not indicated any barriers to attending: I am awaiting an abstract.

The second session is a break out to discuss the cases. It is not closed but it is a working meeting to follow up on the first session.

Biomedical data integrators grapple with a fundamental blocker in research today: licensing for data use and redistribution. Complex licensing and data reuse restrictions hinder most publicly-funded, seemingly “open” biomedical data from being put to its full potential. Such issues include missing licenses, non-standard licenses, and restrictive provisions. The sheer diversity of licenses are particularly thorny for those that aim to redistribute data. Redistributors are often required to contact each sub-source to obtain permissions, and this is complicated by the fact that on each side of the agreement there may be multiple legal entities involved and some sub-sources may themselves already be aggregating data from other sub-sources. Furthermore, interpreting legal compliance with source data licensing and use agreements is complicated, as data is often manipulated, shared, and redistributed by many types of research groups and users in various and subtle ways. Here, we debut a new effort, the (Re)usable Data Project, where we have created a five-part rubric to evaluate biomedical data sources and their licensing information to determine the degree to which unnegotiated and unrestricted reuse and redistribution are provided. We have tested the (Re)usable Data rubric against various biomedical data sources, ranking each source on a scale of zero to five stars, and have found that approximately half of the resources rank poorly, getting 2.5 stars or less. Our goal is to help biomedical informaticians and other users navigate the plethora of issues in reusing and redistributing biomedical data. The (Re)usable Data project aims to promote standardization and ease of reuse licensing practices by data providers.

On Aug 25, 2017, at 6:42 AM, jbminster > wrote:

I will be leaving San Diego on the 18th at 6am, but will only land in Montreal at 9pm. Connections to and from San Diego are terrible, as usual. Bernard

Hi all,
Just making plans.. does anyone want to meet the evening beforehand? I will plan to arrive on the 18th and leave on the 20th, please let me know if I have missed anything in terms of scheduling ;-).

Cheers,
Melissa

On Aug 18, 2017, at 10:06 AM, mhaendel > wrote:

Hi all,
I’m intermittently on internet as on vacation- just wanted to let you know i can provide a title and abstract next week.
Sorry for the delay!

Also - I probably cannot attend all of RDA, but would really like also to spend some social time before and/or after with all of you - can you let me know your schedules?

Best,
Melissa

On Aug 18, 2017, at 6:37 AM, Repositorian > wrote:

Dear Christoph and All,

We have two other speakers identified for the first session but we need confirmation they are attending. The case presenter from Canada can cover travel but has asked if registration would be applicable since the speaker will only attend for our sessions. The other one has not indicated any barriers to attending: I am awaiting an abstract.

The second session is a break out to discuss the cases. It is not closed but it is a working meeting to follow up on the first session.

A quick email to introduce myself as I will (unexpectedly) be attending
RDA10 and look forward to meeting those of you also attending.

I work for CGIAR, a network if 15 international agricultural research
centers. We are at the early stages of developing best practice guidelines
and support tools on ‘privacy and ethics considerations in the data
life-cycle, including practical approaches to address constraints’ - this
will include looking at issues of legal interoperability. I came across
this RDA IG while looking for external initiatives to connect with and am
pleased to have found a community that appears to be grappling with similar
issues in a range of different user contexts.

A quick email to introduce myself as I will (unexpectedly) be attending RDA10 and look forward to meeting those of you also attending.

I work for CGIAR, a network if 15 international agricultural research centers. We are at the early stages of developing best practice guidelines and support tools on ‘privacy and ethics considerations in the data life-cycle, including practical approaches to address constraints’ - this will include looking at issues of legal interoperability. I came across this RDA IG while looking for external initiatives to connect with and am pleased to have found a community that appears to be grappling with similar issues in a range of different user contexts.

(sent via gmail as it's the email account I used to sign up to the RDA mailing lists)

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:04 PM, mhaendel > wrote:
Hi all,
Just making plans.. does anyone want to meet the evening beforehand? I will plan to arrive on the 18th and leave on the 20th, please let me know if I have missed anything in terms of scheduling ;-).

Cheers,
Melissa

On Aug 18, 2017, at 10:06 AM, mhaendel > wrote:

Hi all,
I’m intermittently on internet as on vacation- just wanted to let you know i can provide a title and abstract next week.
Sorry for the delay!

Also - I probably cannot attend all of RDA, but would really like also to spend some social time before and/or after with all of you - can you let me know your schedules?

Best,
Melissa

On Aug 18, 2017, at 6:37 AM, Repositorian > wrote:

Dear Christoph and All,

We have two other speakers identified for the first session but we need confirmation they are attending. The case presenter from Canada can cover travel but has asked if registration would be applicable since the speaker will only attend for our sessions. The other one has not indicated any barriers to attending: I am awaiting an abstract.

The second session is a break out to discuss the cases. It is not closed but it is a working meeting to follow up on the first session.