Dean Gibson's Amateur Radio Tools

The Phonetic Alphabet Habit

FCC Rule Part 97.119(b)(2) says, for station identification using a phone emission,
"Use of a standard phonetic alphabet as an aid for correct station identification is encouraged".
However, today a large number of amateur radio operators use self-invented phonetic alphabets that range
from the fanciful to the obscure, and many of them are confusing.

Phonetic alphabets were used in radio communications as early as World War I (1916), as aid to clarity
of verbal communications. Police organizations soon followed with variants, a few of which are still
in use today. Shortly after World War II, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)i, in
consideration of the recognition of words in different languages, designed a phonetic alphabet that
would be easy to understand by non-native English speakers, and adopted it for use in all
aviation voice communications by all signatory countries. It was adopted in quick succession by the US
military, NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization), and finally the ITU (International Telecommunications
Union) in 1956.

The ITU phonetic alphabet is the
international standard in use today, by the US military, civilian aeronautical and maritime, search &
rescue groups, and other public safety organizations. The only possible competing "standard" in the USA
is the old police alphabet, which is only used by some police departments (which is ironic considering
that most of their personnel come from a military background). Virtually all of these organizations
require the use of their adopted phonetic alphabet, because all of these organizations are involved
in operations where confusion in communications can compromise safety. For example, FAA controllers have
been known to discipline civilian pilots on the air for using non-standard phonetics.

FCC Rule Part 97.1 says, "Basis and purpose. The rules and regulations in this Part are designed to
provide an amateur radio service having a fundamental purpose as expressed in the following principles: (a)
Recognition and enhancement of the value of the amateur service to the public as a voluntary noncommercial
communication service, particularly with respect to providing emergency communications. … (c)
Encouragement and improvement of the amateur service through rules which provide for advancing skills in
both the communications and technical phases of the art. … (e) Continuation and extension of the
amateur's unique ability to enhance international goodwill."

So, what do we amateur radio operators do? We are the only radio communications service that purports
to have an emergency communications purpose, where many operators feel free to use any fanciful phonetic
alphabet they chose (or, in many cases, different phonetic words for the same letter in the same
transmission). This is not only poor communications practice; it bodes ill for our ability to assist in
times of emergencies. To think that we can use any old phonetic that comes to mind in daily communications,
and then switch to using standard phonetics in a time of crisis, is a fantasy. Fortunately, many amateur
nets (social, traffic, and emergency preparedness) are coming to realize this, and are requiring the
use of ITU phonetics.

So, why should amateur radio operators always use the ITU phonetic alphabet when phonetics are desired?

Standard phonetic words are recognized more quickly and more reliably in all operating
conditions. The idea that individuals can design better-understood words is a fantasy, and reveals
a fundamental lack of understanding of the value of common standards.

We develop habits that will serve us well in times of emergencies, and use practices that are
compatible with (rather than alienate) the public service agencies that we often serve.

We enhance international goodwill by not making non-native English speaking amateur radio operators
guess what words we are using (self-invented phonetic alphabets seem particularly popular in
DX contacts).

Words derived from foreign locations (e.g.,"America", "Brazil", "Mexico", …) not only invite
confusion with the operator's location, but are commonly spelled and pronounced differently in
different languages.

Using a self-invented phonetic word that is not carefully designed as part of a standard alphabet
can be confused with other words. Probably the most common example is the "cute" phonetic
"Kilowatt" for "K" callsign prefixes, which can be taken to be a "KW" prefix.

Finally, in an era where amateur radio band privileges are threatened by commercial and foreign
interests, we can appear to be operators that are actually interested in
"… advancing skills in both the communications and technical phases of the art."

If you have any questions, comments, or suggestions, please use the
AE7Qmessage board.
I've spent a considerable amount of time documenting the vanity application process and publicly
answering very common questions, so that I don't have to repeatedly answer them.
Private messages on these topics will be rebuffed or ignored.