FREE Case Evaluation

[stapolin_as_form]

Definition of Driving in Annapolis DUI Cases

Driving under the influence cases are not always straightforward as the term “driving” is not always literal. The complexity involved in Annapolis DUI driving laws can make a case more severe than anticipated or potentially provide a defense. Therefore, when navigating DUI charges, hiring an experienced defense attorney is essential.

Definition of Driving

In the context of Annapolis DUI driving laws, “driving” does not always mean that an officer observes someone actually driving their car. It may mean that someone was at the scene of a car accident. It may seem that they were driving and are off the road. A law enforcement officer might have found the person, performed a wellness check, and established that the person was driving or had admitted to driving. Another situation is when someone is sitting in the driver’s seat, the vehicle is on and they are sitting with their hands on the wheel but they are not going anywhere. Someone in their car on the side of the road or in a parking lot can still get a DUI.

Each situation is very unique. Control plays a large role. There is precedent that can be shown that the person is not driving or is not in control. The actual circumstances of that particular location speak to what may or may not be driving in order for someone to be charged.

DUI Enforcement

Law enforcement officers may patrol parking lots near bars or restaurants looking for DUI drivers. Those are well-known areas that officers always patrol. Law enforcement officers know that when it comes to drinking and driving, the best thing they can do is stop that person before something happens. The longer the person drives; the more risk they are to everyone else on the road. Annapolis DUI driving laws allow law enforcement to seek people who have not even left a parking lot yet.

Proving Operation of a Vehicle

The prosecution must prove that someone was driving when they receive a DUI. Every case involves elements. Every citation has certain elements that must be met. If a citation carries five elements; one of which is to prove the person was driving under the statute; it must be proven. Without one of the elements, the person must be found not guilty because the prosecution did not complete the necessary factual basis and evidentiary basis for that charge.

It is possible that when two people are standing outside the vehicle and the officers cannot figure out who was driving, they charge them both. Without a witness, it can be difficult to get the two people to testify against each other. The two people can simply both enter the Fifth Amendment and then the state can rely on whatever testimonies they would like to bring forth. It is incredibly difficult to prove that one was driving and one was not, but people have been charged this way before.

FREE Case Evaluation

After discussion with the state, client agreed to a plea to count 2 (CDS possession heroin – max 4yrs/$25k fine). Substantial mitigation before the Judge, to which she agreed to 2 years ALL suspended, 2 years supervised probation. Modification motion filed and to be considered upon completion or probation for the guilty finding to be […]

Client charged with DUI, DWI and several jailable and payable traffic citation after a 2-car accident. Substantial conversation with the State and witnesses, officers and the State dropped all jailable charges (DUI/DWI) and client was granted Probation Before Judgement to negligent driving – no points and no fine, only court costs. The client was thrilled!

After a conversation with the officer and State, put us in a position for a deal for an exchange of information on any damages and a certified check for that amount, in exchange for a STET to Nolle Pros for next available court date to complete the exchange and compliance of the Nolle Pros. No points, […]

With an extensive criminal history and pending matters before the District Court, this was a very delicate matter. The client pleaded to and amended count of disorderly conduct after extensive conversation with the state. All other charges Nolle Pros’d. After substantial mitigation, the client received 30 days concurrent with previous 60 days sentence from another […]

Having recently been incorrectly cited in a rather serious auto collision, I had a few choices regarding my traffic violations. After contacting several attorneys, I received a call back from Price Benowitz LLP. After my initial conversation with Seth, he sent me his contact information via email and text. He reiterated Price Benowitz’ stance on […]

I was really worried about a citation I received in Maryland. I found Seth online, and only 20 minutes after reaching out to his office I got a call back from Mr. Okin. It was an amazing consult, he immediately started asking me about my achievements, my aspirations, and what we could do to fight […]

I was looking online for an attorney to help me out with a minor traffic case and I came across Seth Okin. I was very much concerned with my tickets as my insurance could go up by a ton. When I spoke to Seth I felt comfortable and he assured me about the case. Seth […]