25:1 By 15 January

Here is a post from over "there" by XXXXXXXXXXXXXX. I brought it over because it kind of jives with the new story out and the great things to happen on the 3rd Wednesday of January. He sounds well connected and rational by reading his other posts.

25 to 1 from 5 sources

By XXXXXXXXXXXXXX @ XXX

My meeting in DC was fruitful. I now have confirmed through 3 deep sources in US that 25 to 1 is on the table. Sources are very well connected. 2 sources in Europe also confirm. 5 now corroborating at 25 to 1. 1 stayed at 100 to 1. Trying to firm up a date. 2 sources still point to Jan 15. Number crunchers all confirming these numbers are minimums. They say Shabibi set 4 to 1 by the end of 07 or sooner but unconfirmed. My only take is that it is no secret Shabibi wants direct foreign investment but needs to shake off indirect investors first. 4 to 1 is too high and I think it will be a tiered rv. 100 to 1 may only create more. Not good for a 4 to 1 goal if it is true. 25 to 1 makes more sense since it removes most speculators and invites direct investors. Members sent me messages asking about reprint. 3 sources investigated this thoroughly. They are well connected and conclude they would know this by now. Reprint not on any radars. GCC currency is for 2010. I am directing my attention to an IMF contact who is away for the holidays. You may send me any source information you want to disclose. Private info will remain so. One member so far said there is a buzz with US senior officials in Iraq. Leonard

Last edited by neno; 17-01-2007 at 02:21 PM.
Reason: Noone Personal Info Please Or Copies from other forums. Thank You.

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxx @ Xxx

Please correct me if I am wrong but I seem to remember a post a while back that said that XXXXXXXXXXXXXX @ XXX goes by another name here at RolClub or perhaps another forum. Am I remembering correctly and if yes, does anybody remember who that would be? Perhaps it was Dr. Cashflow, that seems to ring a bell. Help please!

Here is a post from over "there" by XXXXXXXXXXXXXX. I brought it over because it kind of jives with the new story out and the great things to happen on the 3rd Wednesday of January. He sounds well connected and rational by reading his other posts.

25 to 1 from 5 sources

By XXXXXXXXXXXXX @ XXX

My meeting in DC was fruitful. I now have confirmed through 3 deep sources in US that 25 to 1 is on the table. Sources are very well connected. 2 sources in Europe also confirm. 5 now corroborating at 25 to 1. 1 stayed at 100 to 1. Trying to firm up a date. 2 sources still point to Jan 15. Number crunchers all confirming these numbers are minimums. They say Shabibi set 4 to 1 by the end of 07 or sooner but unconfirmed. My only take is that it is no secret Shabibi wants direct foreign investment but needs to shake off indirect investors first. 4 to 1 is too high and I think it will be a tiered rv. 100 to 1 may only create more. Not good for a 4 to 1 goal if it is true. 25 to 1 makes more sense since it removes most speculators and invites direct investors. Members sent me messages asking about reprint. 3 sources investigated this thoroughly. They are well connected and conclude they would know this by now. Reprint not on any radars. GCC currency is for 2010. I am directing my attention to an IMF contact who is away for the holidays. You may send me any source information you want to disclose. Private info will remain so. One member so far said there is a buzz with US senior officials in Iraq. Leonard

Here is a post from over "there" by XXXXXXXXXXXXXX. I brought it over because it kind of jives with the new story out and the great things to happen on the 3rd Wednesday of January. He sounds well connected and rational by reading his other posts.

25 to 1 from 5 sources

By XXXXXXXXXXXXX @ XXX

My meeting in DC was fruitful. I now have confirmed through 3 deep sources in US that 25 to 1 is on the table. Sources are very well connected. 2 sources in Europe also confirm. 5 now corroborating at 25 to 1. 1 stayed at 100 to 1. Trying to firm up a date. 2 sources still point to Jan 15. Number crunchers all confirming these numbers are minimums. They say Shabibi set 4 to 1 by the end of 07 or sooner but unconfirmed. My only take is that it is no secret Shabibi wants direct foreign investment but needs to shake off indirect investors first. 4 to 1 is too high and I think it will be a tiered rv. 100 to 1 may only create more. Not good for a 4 to 1 goal if it is true. 25 to 1 makes more sense since it removes most speculators and invites direct investors. Members sent me messages asking about reprint. 3 sources investigated this thoroughly. They are well connected and conclude they would know this by now. Reprint not on any radars. GCC currency is for 2010. I am directing my attention to an IMF contact who is away for the holidays. You may send me any source information you want to disclose. Private info will remain so. One member so far said there is a buzz with US senior officials in Iraq. Leonard

IMHO. The problem with these nembers is that speculators DO NOT care what the preice level is currently. While a 4 to 1 may eliminate us small investors, but the rest of the financial world has considerable resources backing them and they only care if the market is going to MOVE! In this case appreciate. The CBI has waited too long to appreciate this currecny and now they have a serious dilemma, the currency is going to move, the street price is already ahead of the official exchange rate, and the world has its eyes of this investment once it exceeded 10%. What are they to do? The pressure is on and they know it. What we need to do is hang on and enjoy the upcomming ride. Thank You.

IMHO. The problem with these nembers is that speculators DO NOT care what the preice level is currently. While a 4 to 1 may eliminate us small investors, but the rest of the financial world has considerable resources backing them and they only care if the market is going to MOVE! In this case appreciate. The CBI has waited too long to appreciate this currecny and now they have a serious dilemma, the currency is going to move, the street price is already ahead of the official exchange rate, and the world has its eyes of this investment once it exceeded 10%. What are they to do? The pressure is on and they know it. What we need to do is hang on and enjoy the upcomming ride. Thank You.

and keep in mind that most of these people who pass on information are with the U.S. GOVERNMENT or connected to it. since the us govt. isnt the ones who are setting the price i dont understand how they keep thinking they know. it should be posted as 'we want' not 'this is what is going to be'. weve seen time and time again when the usa thought they had iraq under control and a wrench was thrown in.

if i recall this post from xxxxxxx xxxxxxx is an old post. it was ressurrected to ask him if he had any further info. from my reading-he doesnt. lets see 25:1 = 4 cents. 4:1 = 25 cents. hope this helps.

IMHO. The problem with these nembers is that speculators DO NOT care what the preice level is currently. While a 4 to 1 may eliminate us small investors, but the rest of the financial world has considerable resources backing them and they only care if the market is going to MOVE! In this case appreciate.The CBI has waited too long to appreciate this currecny and now they have a serious dilemma, the currency is going to move, the street price is already ahead of the official exchange rate, and the world has its eyes of this investment once it exceeded 10%. What are they to do? The pressure is on and they know it. What we need to do is hang on and enjoy the upcomming ride. Thank You.

Good to see you posting on Jan 1st. Happy New Year to you and all of our Rolclub family. Now for my question(s).

It would appear that the cbi is either unaware of their current situation, uncaring, or controlled by an outside influence (ie IMF, World Bank etc.) If the latter is true, then what based on your above post is the right move based on the big boys vs the cbi? It appeared by your comments, that you felt 25/1 or 4/1 was too low. You mentioned the cbi has a "serious dilema" in that the big boys want to know if the currency is going to move. Hopefully you aren't referring to the (pitiful imo) 150 point move the dinar has made recently. When the public officals made the statement that there was going to be a "significant move in the dinar by the end of 2006", I don't know about you but 1/10 of 1 us cent isn't very significant in my book and doesn't seem to fit with the statement imo.

We read in recent articles about them wanting a stable currency and about worrying about "a run on the local currency". In your opinon if they stay with their public statements and adjust the dinar to the 1260 dinar = 1 usd for the first 3 months of 2007, what would that do their economy? For heaven's sake that is only appreciating the dinar to only .00793 usd not even 1 us cent. How does that fit with all of their stated goals and objectives for 2007 and allow them to reach their lofty stated goals and objectives?

It would appear to me, that a sudden bold adjustment is the best way for them to proceed forward if they really do want to address their countries needs. What could be the possible hold up now in your opinon?

Are we there yet? I'm getting really tired of waiting and I am getting wet from all of the dribbling. Come on you know it is the right thing to do for your country. R/V the thing in 1 large dramtic move to over 1 usd at least (1 sdr will be fine for a start) will ya?