Recent Comments

All or Nothing:

The CA Supreme Court

Proving that they have no regard for the First Amendment, The California Supreme Court has ruled that Catholic Charities must include birth control coverage in its health care plan for workers even though it is morally opposed to contraception. The Court ruled that since the charity was not a ‘

Share this:

Published by

Joe Carter

Joe Carter founded Evangelical Outpost in 2005. He is the web editor for First Things and an adjunct professor of journalism at Patrick Henry College. A fifteen-year Marine Corps veteran, he previously served as the managing editor for the online magazine Culture11 and The East Texas Tribune. Joe has also served as the Director of Research and Rapid Response for the Mike Huckabee for President campaign and as a director of communications for both the Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity and Family Research Council. He is the co-author of How to Argue like Jesus: Learning Persuasion from History's Greatest Communicaton.
View all posts by Joe Carter

repopulate the earth, that’s what the Good Book says. we already have 6 Billion, we could double it in just a few years!

dicknbush

repopulate the earth, that’s what the Good Book says. we already have 6 Billion, we could double it in just a few years!

http://www.vigilancematters.com/ Marty

I assume you’ve already heard that the Salvation Army is being sued — for Religious Discrimination of all things!http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/25/nyregion/25salvation.html
Keep this in mind, the next time someone claims that the FMA is the first constitutional amendement to “limit” rights. Obviously the first amendment was adopted soley to LIMIT religious expression…

http://www.vigilancematters.com Marty

I assume you’ve already heard that the Salvation Army is being sued — for Religious Discrimination of all things!http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/25/nyregion/25salvation.html
Keep this in mind, the next time someone claims that the FMA is the first constitutional amendement to “limit” rights. Obviously the first amendment was adopted soley to LIMIT religious expression…

Ed Jordan

There is this wild sentence in the article: “The Supreme Court ruled that the charity is not a religious employer because it offers such secular services as counseling, low-income housing and immigration services to the public without directly preaching about Catholic values.”
Wow. This is secularists saying, “Your style of ministry doesn’t fit my stereotype of religion, so I’m ruling that your activities aren’t religious at all.” What does the CA Supreme Court want? An altar call after every counseling session?

Ed Jordan

There is this wild sentence in the article: “The Supreme Court ruled that the charity is not a religious employer because it offers such secular services as counseling, low-income housing and immigration services to the public without directly preaching about Catholic values.”
Wow. This is secularists saying, “Your style of ministry doesn’t fit my stereotype of religion, so I’m ruling that your activities aren’t religious at all.” What does the CA Supreme Court want? An altar call after every counseling session?

My fellow Mirror of Justice blawgger blawgged an announcement of his NRO column Confine & Conquer, in which he opines:Earlier this week, the supreme court of California announced that “Catholic Charities of Sacramento,” although an “organ of the Roman …

My fellow Mirror of Justice blawgger blawgged an announcement of his NRO column Confine & Conquer, in which he opines:Earlier this week, the supreme court of California announced that “Catholic Charities of Sacramento,” although an “organ of the Roman …