Dedicated to the advancement of the State of Indiana by re-affirming our state's constitutional principles that: all people are created equal; no religious test shall be imposed on our public officials and offices of trust; and no special privileges or immunities shall be granted to any class of citizens which are not granted on the same terms to all citizens.
Advance Indiana, LLC. Copyright 2005-15. All rights reserved.

Monday, August 13, 2012

Indy Council Approves Domestic Partner Benefits

The Indianapolis City-County Council approved domestic partner benefits for unmarried city and county workers tonight by a vote of 20-8. All of the opponents of the measure sponsored by Councilors Angela Mansfield (D) and Robert Lutz (R) were Republicans. Republican councilors who spoke against the measure most often cited the potential cost of the benefit--about $200,000 a year, no more than Mayor Ballard just spent in the middle of a budget crisis on pay raises for his staff, and a paltry sum compared to the hundreds of millions in handouts the council has approved over the past few years for billionaire sports team owners and private developers.

Councilor Pam Hickman hit back at the opponents for their willingness to deny health care benefits to any of their fellow citizens because of their disapproval of their personal living arrangements. Without insurance, she pointed out that the uninsured often avoid visits to the doctor's office and wait until they have a serious illness before showing up at hospital emergency rooms where the cost of receiving health care as an uninsured is at least three times as expensive as the cost of obtaining health care for a person who is covered by a health insurance plan. As Councilor Mansfield explained, many who might otherwise be eligible elect not to take advantage of the health insurance benefit because, unlike married employees, an unmarried employee is taxed on the benefits his or her domestic partner receives.

Councilor Jack Sandlin (R) complained that domestic partner benefits would be susceptible to fraud, but Councilor Jeff Miller (R) countered that the anti-fraud provisions contained in the proposal require far more proof to obtain the benefits than are required of someone who claims to be married. Councilor Lutz, an attorney, pointed out that some couples choose to marry simply for the legal benefits of marriage after entering into prenuptial agreements, regardless of whether they live together as husband and wife. Like it or not, he said the concept of marriage has evolved and is not what it used to be.

As I previously reported, Mayor Greg Ballard, who earlier indicated his support for the proposal, has wavered in his support in recent days. Reliable sources tell me that it's merely a ploy on Ballard's part to force the Democratic leadership on the council to advance his push to add six more TIF districts, which would further decimate the city's property tax base at a time that property tax revenues are shrinking from declining property values, as a trade-off for his support of domestic partner benefits. There are unlikely enough votes on the council to override a mayoral veto because I count at least two of the five Republican councilors who voted for its passage who would not vote to override the mayor's veto.

SUPPORT ADVANCE INDIANA

It takes many hours of time to publish content for Advance Indiana. If you enjoy reading the content of this blog, please help out by contributing. You can click on the "Make A Donation" button below to support Advance Indiana by using PayPal. Thanks to all of those readers who have made contributions in the past and continue to support this blog with your contributions. If you would rather support the blog using an alternative source of payment or would like to advertise on this blog, e-mail me at gwelsh@indy.rr.com for more information.

Blogflux

Subscribe To

Comment Policy

Advance Indiana allows you to post comments via this blog subject to the guidelines set forth herein. You understand that any comments you post are your own and are not those of Advance Indiana. You further understand that Advance Indiana is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced in your comments. Unlawful, harassing, defamatory, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, racially offensive, or otherwise objectionable comments are not acceptable. If you think any content posted or otherwise included in Advance Indiana violates the guidelines set forth herein, then please alert Advance Indiana.
Advance Indiana reserves the right to pre-screen, edit, and remove any post as it deems appropriate. You specifically acknowledge that Advance Indiana has no obligation to display any post submitted or otherwise provided via Advance Indiana.