And I can't wait to see Obama-haters epic dissapointment...and then trying to make something out of nothing.
The delayed release of the tape = Hype.
Hype = trying to make something out of nothing.

edit on 2-3-2012 by OutKast Searcher because: (no reason given)

Personally, I think the delayed release of the tapes has to do with this internet shutdown on March 8th that is supposed to happen, bet when it comes
back up lots of stuff will mysteriously "disappear from the web.",

Originally posted by AMajor7
First of all, who in their right mind is going to give a warning that they plan to divulge potentially damaging information on the President of the
United States? Are you kidding me? Not very Breit-bart. Sorry, but he made his bed,

Isn't it odd.... people like Jerome Corsi, Joe Arpaio, and Breitbart are actually stupid enough to give a warning? Where is the benefit in that? That
would be like somebody telling a store owner that they are going to rob their business on a certain day. Why not keep their mouth shut until the day
they are going to release the information?

Now the people who are in possession of Breitbarts video are doing the same damn thing....giving everybody a heads up that they plan on releasing it
on a certain day. What's wrong with today? Why give those who might be damaged an opportunity to stop it? This is a game. Total frickn joke and a
half.

on contrare! I think people who have daming evidence like this are actually SAYING it ahead of time these days in order to PROTECT their life.
Meaning, if I get it out to the public, they wouldnt dare kill me because of how it would look. However, TPTB are getting very brazen these days and
what we really should be concerned about is the fact that TPTB ARE getting that brazen, like they just dont have to do this stuff in secret anymore?

if, by violence, you are referring to this definition (which i believe you are), then Ayers and the Weather Underground never partook in violence.
they methodologically picked symbolic targets while carefully and tactfully assuring no one would be injured in their bombings. each of their bombings
was in response to actual violence occurring in Vietnam as well as domestically at the hands of the police against activists here in the U.S. as a
result of their caution, no one was ever injured in a Weather Underground bombings. whether their tactics were the proper tactics i will not ponder
here, but suffice it to say, his ideology and acts were consistently non-violent, and based on
this definition of terrorism, which necessitates violence, Ayers never actually partook in
terrorism. as for attributing the belief in killing one's parents to Mr. Ayers, that is simply a flat out lie. it's sad Republicans are resorting to
beating this dead horse issue which was already used ad nauseum by the McCain/Palin campaign in 2008. why don't you do yourself a favor and learn
something about Ayers/the Weather Underground yourself:

The outcome of what the video really doesnt matter though in my opinion. Obama has already been the worst presedent on record. He has destroyed our
constitution. If I have to explain why your too old and invested in the system to the point where it would be too painfull for you to realize what
was in front of you so ill stop now. If you think Obama is a good president than watch some espn, turn off you brain, and listen to cnn.

Their goal was to create a clandestine revolutionary party for the violent overthrow of the US government.[3]

The "Days of Rage", their first public demonstration on October 8, 1969, was a riot in Chicago timed to coincide with the trial of the Chicago
Seven.The group planned the October 8–11 event as a "National Action" built around John Jacobs' slogan, "bring the war home."[1] The National
Action grew out of a resolution drafted by Jacobs and introduced at the October 1968 SDS National Council meeting in Boulder, Colorado. The
resolution, titled "The Elections Don't Mean #—Vote Where the Power Is—Our Power Is In The Street" and adopted by the council, was prompted by
the success of the Democratic National Convention protests in August 1968 and reflected Jacobs' strong advocacy of direct action as a political
strategy.

The direct actions included vandalism against homes, businesses and automobiles, and assault against police officers. Dozens were injured, and over
280 members of the Weather Underground were arrested.

You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows was the title of a position paper they distributed at an SDS convention in Chicago
on June 18, 1969. This founding document called for a "white fighting force" to be allied with the "Black Liberation Movement" and other radical
movements[5] to achieve "the destruction of US imperialism and achieve a classless world: world communism."[6]

Originally posted by Destinyone
Part of me wonders, what legal dancing will happen over the release of these tapes. Since Obama has secured, through the courts, all his past
college records, will he attempt to shove these tapes under that same umbrella of legal secrecy.

This will be very interesting...

That's one potential approach to quash them. I believe they should release them via several avenues, all at the same time, and make sure at least 2
or 3 releases are on torrent - with copies for download on several computers in several different countries.

Get those babies a wide=based head start out in the wilds of the internet, and they'll be out there forever.

He did everything in his power to kill health care reform in this country and then drops dead of a heart attack at 43.

The two have absolutely nothing in common with each other. This is quite possibly the worst thought out attempt at discrediting someone i've ever
read.

The last thing this country needs is government saying "do this and do that" like in your precious Obamacare.

edit on 2-3-2012 by PrimePorkchop
because: (no reason given)

It isn't saying do this and do that.

Of course it is. the individual mandate is ALL about taking your choice away and eliminating your options to live as you see fit and buy what YOU
choose to buy or not buy. It's the State telling you how to live and what to buy.

You blame posters for jumping to conclusions without having any basis in facts.....

then you ask them to answer a question that no one can know the answer to..... according to the facts available?

When it comes right down to it, it isn't some kind of 'leap of faith' to surmise that AB did plan to release tape(s) in the near term, given what
he said before his death and what his confidant has said since. Is there reason to doubt what was said regarding a March 1st release?

Originally posted by ignorant_ape
i read these threads regarding mr Breitbart , and despair - so few people seem to have any grasp of the facts , or even care - all they wish to do is
spin the tail to fit thier personal ideology

the facts of the matter are :

feb 10 2012 - mr Breitbart , claims to have access to one or more peices of film / video footage from obamas ` college days ` and further that he will
ensure obama is ` properly vetted this election `

now with zero evidence - people have leaped to the " fact " that Breitbart planned to release the tapes / films on march 1st

“I’ve got video from his college days that show you why racial division and class warfare are central to what hope and change was sold in 2008
– the videos are going to come out,” said Breitbart, adding that Obama would be vetted.

He stated that the videos are coming out. He specifically mentioned March 1st.
Now, I don't claim to be a genius, but I do have some ability to comprehend the English language. It pretty much seems to me that he meant that the
videos would be released on that date. IF he was murdered, I would also think his assailants believed this, too.

Also:

Breitbart spoke of his intention to release the tape during his CPAC speech last month. The footage shows Obama in his college days appearing
alongside former Weather Underground terrorists Bill and Bernardine Dohrn. Observers had speculated that the footage could have derailed Obama’s
hopes for a second term.

He said this in a speech in front of many people, not just his associate.

Really. It's not a stretch to believe that this is what he intended on doing with the videos.
I'm not understanding why you have a problem with how people have interpreted the facts.

Does it really matter what it was/is in the vids? So what if it's a steamy homosexual orgy or Muslim worship or smoking reefer or his professor
diddling him or what-so-bloody-ever. Does it really matter? He was at university - Ivy League university. What is college for if not for getting up
to no good? What is youth for if not to sew some wild oats and to do stuff you might not do otherwise? How many of you have lived every bloody
moment of your lives in a guarded fashion just in the off-chance you might be a party candidate someday?

Of all of the options that this "explosive" revelation might possibly be, what would be worst? Why? To you or to everyone? So how is it so
earth-shattering? In the big picture, does it even really matter? Because you know...haters are just gonna hate. Doesn't matter what you do.
Haters just hate.

The real problem with politics is that people keep participating in such a totally bogus pack of lies in the first place. Until the whole system is
torn down and re-tooled (no pun intended there, though it does work, doesn't it? lol), no one on the face of the Earth will have their say. The
present system is rife with corruption and the corrupt. When you play with fire, you will get burnt.

Does it really matter what it was/is in the vids? So what if it's a steamy homosexual orgy or Muslim worship or smoking reefer or his professor
diddling him or what-so-bloody-ever. Does it really matter?

actually it would matter, others have been fired for less and had there been a video of Monica under Bill's desk he would have been canned too

He was at university - Ivy League university.

can you actually prove that he was?
while you are at it can you actually prove there was any hope and change spread around?

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.