Syugecin

Hello, Syugecin, and welcome to the Harry Potter Wiki (HPW). Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

I hope you enjoy editing here! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you are currently contributing anonymously, consider creating an account, also be sure to verify an e-mail address at your preferences if you do. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Community portal or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

hello!

hi! i dont know how you found out about me but I so desperatley need someone to talk to!--Mudbloodandproud 20:07, 12 August 2007 (UTC) PS what house are you in? and what do your messages mean? --Mudbloodandproud 20:10, 12 August 2007 (UTC) that's awesome! great! I have only been here for an hour but i have been on the wiki before. :) sincerely,
the Mudblood you probably know who i am so i just want to let you know you are just about the same age as me. I know how old you are because you have your date of birth on your page.

Hello

Talk

Check my talk page. Its easier to follow the conversation if we just leave it there. -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 21:27, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: Fred and George

Looks good! I did a couple of small edits in the infobox. I'll read the pages in more depth later. Only other thing I noticed, but I wasn't sure about it so I didn't change it, should Fred and George be in the Second Order of the Phoenix (category)? -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 00:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Style

Since we had talked about style a little before - I'm working on a Layout guide, I was wondering if you had any opinion - what should be added, removed, etc. - about it. Thanks. -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 20:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't know. I like the relationships section for certain characters - its certinaly not necessary for all buy like Ginny Weasley its nice on, I think. -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 18:26, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Reply

And there we go! How's that? Some people are just different in the way they approach things. Me, as long as I know what's going on, its all good. - Cavalier One 22:19, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Recent changes

I don't think there's any hard and fast rule about minor edits. I was clogging it up earlier. Generally, I list minor edits if it's just a couple of words or minor spelling/grammar. If I remember :). More often than not I just hit save after previewing. - Cavalier One 14:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: Adminnie

RE: Hello

I'm not really sure, that's a tough one. What are the majority of them by now? I would say that spells should probably be by the incantation, but the incantation is really the name of the spell, something like "Silencing Charm" is. That's a tough one. Maybe post in the Community Portal talk page about it? -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 13:19, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Duel in the Ministry Atrium

I don't think you should have deleted the page, as it was an important battle and there was a lot to be said about it. Could you perhaps undo the edit and discuss it on the talk page to see what other people think?

Syugecin, I reverted your redirect. My reasons are on the talk page, but basically I don't think that all the information on the duel should be lost. Redirecting it to the Second War page may be desirable, but the existing text needs to be merged effectively into the article, not just redirected. As a result, I have added a merge tag to the Duel in the Ministry Atrium article. Feel free to answer this either on my talk page or on the Duel talk page, and hopefully we can get a resolution on this. Many thanks, - Cavalier One 13:33, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem :) We need passionate users here. You may have the right idea about redirecting it, but the info can't be lost. If you want to look over it and try merging it, be my guest. I may look at it myself in a few days. Keep up the good work. - Cavalier One 22:22, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Re:Chapter

Do you really think they need to be deleted? Or do they just need to be expanded? John Reaves(talk) 01:53, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Spell infobox

Thanks. You never know, if you keep doing good work and get your temper under control...anything's possible. As for the spell infoboxes there should probably be a seperate field for incantation - I'm adding it now. (New template is below from {{Spell infobox}}). -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 20:01, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey, I noticed you created a new category for protective spells. Were you planning on recategorizing all the spells? Or a large portion of them. It would be nice to be able to not automatically include the Spell category with the infobox, but if I removed it now we would all of a sudden have 500 articles uncategorized. If you edit any spells add it in. -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 00:24, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Heya

I don't see why we would take it off. The field collapses unless something is put in it (i.e. if its left blank you don't even see it). I think its a good field to have for the spells. Maybe there are some out there that could have it added? ;) Which spell does have it? -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 02:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Rollback

Hi, Syugecin. It has been determined that you are a trusted member of this community and that we benefit from your contributions. Upon request or through my own description, I have granted you rollback privileges. This tool can be used to quickly revert vandalism and maintain the quality of this wiki. Please remember to use this tool with discretion and never in a content dispute. You should now see a "rollback" link when viewing a user's contributions. Thanks, and happy editing. John Reaves(talk) 21:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Hello

The reasons articles about major fansites are included is to give some background information on them. I don't really think we're "associating" ourselves with them. Regardless, it is important to provide places for users to find further information that may not yet be in this wiki. A light section to the spell infobox? Sounds good, I've added it. I'm not sure what you mean by that last part? You moved the article from Relashio to Revulsion Jinx since that is the name while Relashio is the incantation? That seems fine to me. And no you don't bother me with your questions. This is what I'm here for afterall. :) -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 05:07, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I see. I would look it up, but I don't have my books with me. Sorry, I can't help you. Although if its referring to a revulsion jinx then it probably is the same one. If there is nothing saying they're different than I would say consider them the same until we have proof otherwise. -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 15:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes, there is. But then every Spell that has the Spell infobox and not the [[Category:Spells]] would be dropped out of the spell category. I'm going to remove it. Just know that if articles drop out of the spell category thats why. You can use here to see everything that has the infobox and might have lost that category. -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 18:27, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Is there somewhere else that the information from that article can fit into? If not than I'd say it needs to stay. If you feel it can fit in somewhere else then it can probably be deleted. -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 03:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Relationships

I'm not sure I've ever made one about that. I can't do it right now though - I'm working on homework and will be busy for the next few days -- meaning I'll probably only be checking change lists, not really editing myself. Give it a try, the worst that happens is someone else edits it! Be BOLD! -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 02:09, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Delete tags

Hi! Can you please not delete existing content from a page when you put a delete tag on it? I like to know what it is that I'm deleting. Just add the delete tag to the top of the article, and inform us if necessary. Thanks! - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 20:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Quotes

Matoro pic

Personally, I have no problem with it. It's confined to his User Page, and he's made no attempt to place it in articles. It's not obscene or offensive (unless Lego/ Bionicle gets to you), and some other wikis have a policy that allows users to upload personal images for use on their User Page as long as they keep it sensible. Wookieepedia, for example, only allows 3 personal pictures to stop server overload. - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 19:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree, its only one image. There's nothing obscene about it. Its OK with me although we don't specifically have a policy on it right now. But thats a good idea of what should be added...thanks. -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 20:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Signature

Just a note -- I'm going to be deleting Template:Signature/Syugecin. If you wish to keep your signature and transclude it please move it to User:Syugecin/sig (or something similar). Thanks. -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 18:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)