Well my opponents account has been closed, and I would like to believe he left in a rage because of me trolling him in this debate meant for an easy win.

However in my trolling t has been brought to my attention that in order to win this trolled debate I have to now define what "Smart People" means since I just defined stupid people as smart people. So allow me to now define what Smart People are.

Smart People are people who
1) have the means to pay $65,000 a year to go to Harvard and are smart enough to meet their academic qualifications required to apply

or

2) are of sufficient intelligence to exceed the academic qualifications and get a scholarship from Harvard and not have to pay $65,000 a year

Two things characterize people who get into Harvard University, they have the ability to pay the costs of going to Harvard, and they meet the academic requirements for getting into Harvard..... So let me Recap my arguments,

1) I defined Stupid People as Smart People
2) I defined Smart People as those who are smart enough to meet Harvard's Admission Standards and have the means to pay $65,000 a year, or as people who are smart enough to surpass Harvard's standards enough to get a scholarship.
3) Harvard has high academic standards and high costs
4) People who do get into Harvard meet both the academic and financial requirements to get in
5) Those people that get in have the means to pay and are smart enough to qualify
6) Those people are what I define as smart
7) I defined stupid people as smart people

Therefore stupid people go to Harvard

I hope that my arguments are sufficient, If they are not feel free to comment about what I left out

You are Pro, and you have the burden of proof, so you need to make a prima facie case. You assume the burden not only by being Pro, but by taking an apparent position contrary to conventional thinking. Con can win without saying a word if you don't make a plausible case. You have implicitly claimed that in this debate we cannot take words in their ordinary meanings, so you have to make a plausible case within those bounds. Since Con has vanished, you'll have space to try to do that.