Betraying Iranian Women

On April 28, 2010, the Islamic Republic of Iran was elected to the United Nation’s Commission on the Status of Women (CSW). Possibly the world’s worst abuser of women, the Shariah-ruled country in which the fate of women and girls is left in the lecherous hands of misogynistic mullahs had been given membership on a commission founded to protect women’s rights and promote their equality. There was little media coverage of the announcement. And there has been little effort to prevent or denounce this obscene situation. But a few voices in Congress, some women human rights leaders, and, most poignantly, Iranian women themselves, have challenged the moral equivalency and cowardly silence of those that have failed to support women’s rights in Iran.

Iran’s CSW election was not surprising for the United Nations, whose moral vacuity remains proudly unmolested on First Avenue and the Palais des Nations. After all, Libya has chaired the Commission on Human Rights and Sudan has graced the Human Rights Commission with its presence during the most ferocious years of the genocide it has perpetrated in Darfur. But for the United States, it was a new low to remain silent in the face of such an outrage.

Iran was elected by acclamation. (Remember vote by acclamation? That was how Barack Obama got the Democratic presidential nomination, when between clenched teeth Hillary suspended the roll call.) In the case of Iran, it meant that none of the UN member states, including the U.S., asked for an open vote on Iran’s election to the women’s commission. Some say that this was a quid pro quo for Iran withdrawing its bid for a seat on the UN Human Rights Council. So human rights abuser Iran will only make UN policy on women’s human rights, not human human rights. The women of Iran are not greatly relieved by this devil’s bargain.

In past years, the U.S. worked to prevent abusers of women, genocidairres, and other assorted miscreants from achieving such positions of authority on UN commissions. American delegations to the UN encouraged the delegations of other countries to take a stand and to work together to present alternatives to objectionable candidates and to objectionable text in resolutions.

This was not an easy task. Dr. Mark Lagon described the challenges faced by the Bush Administration at the UN in an April 19, 2005

testimony at a subcommittee hearing of the House International Relations Committee (now House Committee on Foreign Affairs). Then Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs, Lagon explained that “some of the most egregious violators of human rights work through their regional blocs to gain nomination and election” to UN commissions “in order to protect themselves and their ilk from criticism.” The UN Commission on Human Rights (CHR) was being “increasingly confronted with bloc voting. . . shifting the CHR’s focus away from bedrock civil and political rights, and toward economic, social, and cultural rights.”

If

the United States could not prevent such elections or resolutions, it could at least be counted on to speak out about such injustices, even when criticized for acting “unilaterally.” For example, in the spring of 2004, in the midst of horrific genocide in Darfur, the UN Commission on Human Rights passed an insultingly weak resolution on Sudan. As Lagon later told students at Georgetown University’s Institute of International Law and Politics, the U.S. tried to revise and/or replace text to more accurately respond to the atrocities taking place. When this failed, the U.S. opposed the resolution. A few days later, when Sudan was reelected to the Commission on Human Rights, Lagon said “the U.S. delegation reproached the body by walking out of the meeting and issuing a public, very critical, statement.”

Under the Obama Administration the U.S. delegation has twice

walked out of speeches by Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The most recent walkout occurred on May 3, 2010, at the UN Conference on the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. But walking out on the Iranian dictator’s sound and fury about “the Zionist regime,” aimed, in part, at America, is less difficult than a public reproach of the UN body for approving Iran’s CSW election.

Writing in Commentary the day after the election, Jennifer Rubin

raged, “The U.S. couldn’t muster a word of opposition — not even call for a vote… why? Because our policy is not to confront and challenge the brutal regime for which rape and discrimination are institutionalized policies. No, rather, we are in the business of trying to ingratiate ourselves, and making the U.S. as inoffensive as possible to the world’s thugocracies. …It is what this administration does and how they envision raising our status in the world.”

Thankfully, “making the U.S. as inoffensive as possible to the world’s thugocracies” is not the approach of some members of the U.S. Congress. U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) released a

statement the day after the election in which she said, “Allowing Iran to sit on the commission, a nation where gender equality is only a dream and where women are subject to inequality in all aspects of their daily lives, makes a mockery of the commission’s work.”

Thaddeus McCotter, a Republican member of the House of Representatives from Michigan, also vehemently

denounced Iran’s election the same day. McCotter declared, “By electing the Tehran butchers to its Commission on the Status of Women, a morally rancid United Nations has salted the wounds of the Iranian freedom movement’s regime-murdered martyrs.” The congressman went on to blast this outrage in an interview on Fox News in which he said that the moral relativism of the UN had allowed Iran to “get elected to sit as a predator monitoring the prey.” McCotter will also introduce a congressional resolution condemning Iran’s election. Hopefully, many other members of congress will join on the resolution as co-sponsors.

No corresponding calls denouncing Iran have been issued by the major feminist organizations, however. The National Organization of Women (NOW) is too busy gloating over the Wal-Mart lawsuit, cheering Democratic congressional delegates, and experiencing ecstasy over President Obama’s U.S. Supreme Court nominee to go about the messy and thankless job of defending the rights of women under Islam. On the other hand, the women’s rights group Equality Now does fight against the evils that affect women under Shariah in Iran and elsewhere, such as

female genital mutilation (FGM), rape, sex trafficking, and child marriage. But perhaps because they work too closely with the disease-ridden United Nations, Equality Now focuses on the symptoms rather than the disease.

Women’s ministries and commissions of left-leaning and “progressive” evangelical churches have also let down the women and girls of Iran by not protesting Iran’s farcical election. The feminists of

such groups make careers of attempting to shatter every stained glass ceiling that they encounter. But given the opportunity to respond to the life-long suffocation of women under Shariah’s oppressive ceiling, they are silent. Officers and staff of these ministries spend their days issuing statements against gender inequality, sexual violence, and the perceived iniquities of misogynistic patriarchal Christianity, but the UN is their friend! And the progressive evangelicals of trendy organizations like Sojourners blog and twitter in their usual self-important, self-righteous way about America’s greed, evil, and injustice. But there is neither a tweet nor a blog post expressing outrage over Iran’s ascendency to the UN commission.

Other than the resolution pending in Congress, there have not been many efforts to support the women of Iran. But on May 5, 2010, a group of women leaders sent an

open letter to Secretary Clinton protesting U.S. silence over the election of Iran to the women’s rights commission. The letter called on Clinton to “denounce Iran’s election. . . as an appointment that shocks the conscience of civilized societies” and demanded to know why the United States failed to request an open vote. “We await your public and clear condemnation of this outrageously sexist and insensitive decision by the U.N.,” the letter concluded.

Letter signers range from Ayaan Hirsi Ali to Wafa Sultan, Anne Applebaum to Diana West. They are international human rights and women’s rights specialists, attorneys, scholars, columnists, media figures, women in the arts, and activists of all sorts. Experience for experience they match and surpass the leftist feminists. But unlike their counterparts in liberal land, the letter signers “get it” and their integrity requires them to enter the realm of the so-called politically incorrect and intolerant on behalf of women living under Shariah.

The most courageous effort to prevent Iran’s CSW election came from Iranians themselves. On April 27, 2010, 214 Iranian women’s rights activists inside and outside Iran sent an

open letter to the United Nations urging that Iran not be allowed CSW membership. Supported by “the global sisterhood network” and endorsed by over a dozen other organizations, the Iranian activists told the UN that “for the sake of women‘s rights globally, an empty seat for the Asia group on CSW is much preferable to Iran‘s membership.” They reminded the UN that “discrimination against women is codified in [Iran’s] laws, as well as in executive and cultural institutions, and Iran has consistently sought to preserve gender inequality in all places, from the family unit to the highest governmental bodies.” Iran will certainly use the opportunity afforded to it on CSW “to curtail progress and the advancement of women,” they warned.

Not long after the UN failed to heed this warning and elected Iran to the CSW, the official Iranian news agency (IRNA) demonstrated the accuracy of the Iranian activists’ prediction when it stated that “Iran’s membership in the Commission on the Status of Women is important because “Iran’s views about the position of women,” through this podium, “can help reflect Islamic views about family and women.” The International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran also

reported IRNA’s claim that efforts against their candidacy were by “hostile groups and western media” trying to prevent Iran’s membership in the CSW through “poisonous propagation.” IRNA then boasted “their efforts were ignored by members of ECOSOC.” A sad indictment of all of the member nations of the UN.

The U.S. and other nations of the free world let down the Iranian people when they stood by and did nothing as the regime crushed the election protesters last year. Some brave Iranian freedom fighters are still

paying the cost for that defiance. Five political prisoners were hanged in secret on May 9, and twenty-seven others are awaiting execution. Now by remaining silent about the election of Iran to the CSW the U.S. has failed to support the people of Iran again.

But this will not deter courageous Iranians. They will find encouragement from those who have decried the UN’s outrageous election. And it’s not too late for the U.S. to help. By supporting legislative efforts like Mr. McCotter’s resolution, the U.S. could, as that resolution’s last sentence says, “reaffirm its solidarity with the Iranian people in their continuing struggle for freedom and human rights, including equal rights for women in Iran.”

Faith J. H. McDonnell directs The Institute on Religion and Democracy’s Religious Liberty Program and Church Alliance for a New Sudan, and is the author of Girl Soldier: A Story of Hope for Northern Uganda’s Children (Chosen Books, 2007).

Asking Iran to guarantee women's rights is like asking pedolfiles to protect children from sexual predators.

michaelle

Exactly-this is ONE BIG sad joke. The UN is filled with fecal brains.

kafir4life

The people I really feel sorry for are the writers at The Onion…….With real-world nonsense like this, what's left for them to write about?

Morrisminor

I am always a bit suspicious when it is the usual theocons behind all this.

Paul P

This fits nicely into Kevin Jackson's "Bizzaro World", where everything is opposite.

http://intensedebate.com/people/JosephWiess JosephWiess

They'll get what's coming to them. Those who didn't stand up and tell Iran no, will understand what they've unleashed, when they are the one's being stoned to death for enjoying life.

Then again, this is one more reason to get the hell out of the UN and stop paying for them.

http://www.theird.org Faith McDonnell

I'm afraid you might be right, Joseph, about them getting what is coming to them. But they sure don't have a clue right now!

Rifleman

Amen, about the UN. It's exacly the organization you would expect it to be knowing the man representing the USA at its' formation was a soviet agent. That revelation alone should have voided the agreement. A United Free Nations might not be a bad idea.

It seems that like the commies, I just can't bring myself to Amen the ignorant and led bringing slavery and horror upon themselves, even though I also think they will have it coming. The truly evil, of which there is never a shortage, are another matter.

http://www.aidwatchers.com Diane

Faith, Thanks for laying out the actions and inactions in a factual and concise way. The idea that something can still be done to hold Iran accountable is a courageous suggestion and I hope our government will.

http://www.theird.org Faith McDonnell

Thanks, Diane. We need to all support Thad McCotter and encourage other members of Congress to join him. As usual, any hope of a way forward seems to come from individual members of Congress, certainly not the State Dept.

http://missionfreeiran.wordpress.com Maria Rohaly

Hi, Faith,

Mission Free Iran has a vigorous campaign ongoing to condemn the UN and its constituent governments for its betrayal of women in Iran and worldwide. Our Facebook group has ~1500 members, many of whom work to translate and disseminate our capaign documents, which are housed on our website here:http://missionfreeiran.wordpress.com/take-action/…

We'd love to have your comments,critique and input.

Best regards,
Maria Rohaly
Mission Free Iran

http://missionfreeiran.wordpress.com Maria Rohaly

I should also have noted that our key demand is the removal of the Islamic Regime from the Commission. This is a key demand missing from the petition to Hillary Clinton, a petition wrongly targeted because the US government chose and intended to keep silent about the regime's seat on this commission.

Thank you for keeping the issue alive.

Best,
Maria

http://www.theird.org Faith McDonnell

Dear Maria: Your key demand to have the Islamic Regime removed from the Commission is a very important one. Yes, you are right it is missing from our petition, But our petition (I am one of the signers) is to pressure the USG, regardless of the fact that they chose and intended to keep silent, and, basically, to call more attention to something which should be objectionable to most people, if they knew. We all have different parts to play.
Best to you, too,
Faith

http://www.theird.org Faith McDonnell

Hi Maria: Actually, I have already joined your Facebook Group. I found it when I was doing research for the article. I will check in with you soon.
Thanks so much.

USMCSniper

A growing majority of Americans who think it's time to withdraw from the United Nations and find other means to address the world's problems, unilaterally, bilaterally, and effectively.

http://informazionecorretta.com Piera Prister

Who betrayed the Iranian women was Ms. Susan Rice, the US Ambassador to the UN. appointed by Mr. Obama, who was not there to oppose and veto the acclamation of Iran by the UN members of the Commission on Women's Status. Where was she? Shame, shame on you, Ms.Rice and on you Mr.Obama! This is truly disgusting, indeed.
After all I'm not surprised, his adviser on Islam is Dalia Mogahed who wears the hijab like Eurabia at White House. O tempora, o mores!

http://intensedebate.com/profiles/missionfreeiran missionfreeiran

Hi Faith! We finally came across McCotter's legislation and are developing and extending a campaign to support HR1371 (http://wp.me/pKzXK-t9) while at the same time demanding some accountability from NOW, Feminist Majority and Code Pink (http://wp.me/pKzXK-u4). I have personally been a member of each of these organizations at various points of time in my life, and to watch them in action now… it is truly appalling.

Anyway, we are working on getting Americans to write their Representatives in support of HR1371, and tomorrow we will be asking our international friends to use HR1371 to push their own governments to reverse themselves and work to get the Islamic Republic removed from the Commission.

WOW just what I was searching for. Came here by searching for fine art photography

http://%URL% lawn companies in Richmond

Howdy! I could have sworn I’ve visited this site before but after browsing through a few of the posts I realized it’s
new to me. Anyways, I’m definitely pleased I found it and I’ll be book-marking it and checking
back regularly!

http://%URL% Bed Credit in San Antonio

My spouse and I stumbled over here from a different website and thought I may as well check things out.

I like what I see so now i’m following you. Look forward to looking at your web page again.

http://%URL% moving in Las Vegas

Thanks for the marvelous posting! I truly
enjoyed reading it, you can be a great author. I will be sure to bookmark your blog and may come
back in the future. I want to encourage you to ultimately continue your great job, have a nice day!

http://%URL% Palm Services in Mesa

Good web site you’ve got here.. It’s difficult to find good quality writing like yours these

days. I truly appreciate individuals like you! Take care!

!

http://%URL% Affordable House Cleaning in Midlothian

Hello there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it’s really informative. I’m gonna watch out for brussels.
I will be grateful if you continue this in future. Lots of people will be benefited from your
writing. Cheers!

http://%URL% home theater system in virginia beach

I visited multiple blogs except the audio feature
for audio songs current at this web site is really superb.

Greetings! Very helpful advice in this particular article!
It’s the little changes that produce the most significant changes. Thanks a lot for sharing!

you are

I truly wanted to post a simple message to be able to express gratitude to you for those awesome guidelines you are writing at this site. My time intensive internet search has finally been honored with excellent know-how to write about with my friends and classmates. I ‘d repeat that most of us site visitors are undoubtedly endowed to live in a useful community with many wonderful professionals with valuable strategies. I feel extremely lucky to have seen your entire webpage and look forward to so many more entertaining minutes reading here. Thanks a lot once again for everything.