Even if Hilary or Trump in the White House is inevitable, the levels of interest in the (L) and (G) parties is enough to push them past the legal barriers setup by the colluding (R) and (D) to sabotage their rivals. If people's level of support continues, they could receive taxpayers' money (like the 2 too-big-to-fail parties already do) and automatic inclusion to the ballots (instead of having to spend more than half of their donations just to be included). So, we could sacrifice this 2-party election for this year, for a 4-party election in the next.

I would say I'm predominantly democrat but Hillary Clinton seems to have so many lies and secrets, I mean so do all politicians but for some reason i cannot trust her to be a good democratic candidate and i definitely do not want her to be the first female president. So, i guess my only other option would be Donald Trump...

What Guys Said 16

Hillary Clinton has confirmed Brain damage based on her leaked medical reports, and she is trying to cover it up to not lose the election based on that. She is retarded as it is, but now we have proof she also is not physically fit for a job as mentally demanding as president.

I'd pick myself. Aren't we mature and big enough to govern ourselves? Why do we need to have someone that tells us what to do? to just comply? To obey? Ah, I'm sorry but I think politics is just so fake and I even wrote a quote about it:

I am neither Democrat or Republican but I will vote Trump. I was a Republican but they are just as bad as the Democrats now after how they treated Trump. Democrats screwed Bernie as well. We need four parties now.

@dudeman political correctness is a problem. However I dont think electing Trump will fix that. His terrible temperment mixed with not listening any opinion but his own he does not display the wisdom to lead a country. I would have elected Rand Paul instead