Share

On 16 April, the Kyrgyz parliament approved amendments to the criminal code imposing a custodial sentence for “spreading false information relating to a crime or offence" in the media at their second and third readings. In order to reduce the risk of abuses as a result of these new provisions, members also proposed a stricter framework for legal proceedings. Reporters Without Borders nonetheless deplores this unnecessary piece of legislation that endangers freedom of information.

“Current legislation already penalizes defamation and 'false accusations',” said Johann Bihr, the head of the press freedom organization's Eastern Europe and Central Asia desk. “The adoption of the new law is a pointless backward step unworthy of the democratic ambitions professed by the Kyrgyz government.

“It makes nonsense of the decriminalisation of defamation in 2011. By once again turning a media-related offence into a crime, the authorities are sending a deterrent message to all journalists, promoting self-censorship and hindering investigative reporting. Despite the desire to create a stricter framework for legal proceedings that accompanied the amendments, the disproportionate penalties it imposes and the vagueness of the term “false information” turn it into a useful weapon for the censors.

“We call on President Almazbek Atambayev to acknowledge that this bill is contrary to the constitution and not to enact it.”

In the event of “false information” about an offence or a crime, the amendments approved on 16 April provide for penalties of between 50,000 and 200,000 Kyrgyz som (approximately 650 and 2,700 euros) and from one year to three years' imprisonment depending on the seriousness of the falsehood.

The bill was sponsored by Eristina Kochkarova, an MP of the Ar-Namys party, among others. She had previously been wrongly accused of being a foreign national and she said she was motivated by the “need to counter the smear campaigns and mud-slinging of some news organizations”. In contrast to the previous bill sponsored by Galina Skripkina of the ruling party that was rejected by Parliament, Kochkarova stressed that the amendments were not only aimed at journalists but also at anyone responsible for spreading false information in the media, whether they were officials or ordinary citizens. However, news organizations fear they may be held criminally responsible for information they quote if they use unidentified sources.

Of the 85 members of Parliament, only seven voted against the bill. One of them was Shirin Aitmatova, the daughter of the renowned writer Chingiz Aitmatov. The day after the bill was passed, Omurbek Abdurakhmanov, supported by 15 other members, demanded that it be resubmitted to a vote.

Many civil society campaigners raised their voices against the amendments. The ombudsman Bakytbek Amanbaev also declared them to be unconstitutional, saying they violated parts of the Basic Law on free expression and free access to information: “Everyone has the right to seek, receive and disseminate information of any kind, unless it is contrary to the current constitutional system or other restrictions as defined by law”. If President Atambayev does not prevent the enactment of the amendments, the ombudsman has said he will appeal to the constitutional chamber of the Supreme Court.

Kyrgyzstan is an exception in Central Asia, marked as it is by despotic and authoritarian governments. It is ranked 97th of 180 countries in the 2014 World Press Freedom Index compiled by Reporters Without Borders. This position could change, however, in the light of recent parliamentary initiatives. Besides the amendments on false information, a bill aimed at banning “homosexual propaganda” was introduced in the Parliament on 15 April. Couched in similar terms to a law enacted in Russia in June last year, it provides for the penalization of, among other things, “the publication of photos, videos or information that implicitly or explicitly encourage non-traditional sexual relations such as homosexuality”.

The independence of the public broadcaster came into question on several occasions, as the outlet aired one-sided reports on the Vecherniy Bishkek dispute and faced allegations of partisan bias in coverage of the October parliamentary elections.

Free Expression & the Law:

More from Free Expression & the Law

The general trend over the past 10 years has been bleak, with an overall negative trajectory for press freedom. The major turning point was the election of Xi Jinping as General Secretary of the Communist Party of China in 2012 and President of China in 2013.

In 2014, Cameroon enacted a broad anti-terror law as part of its effort to counter the extremist group Boko Haram, but authorities are using it to arrest and threaten local journalists who report on the militants or unrest in the country’s English-speaking regions.

Since 2013, law enforcement authorities in Bangladesh have illegally detained scores of opposition activists and held them in secret without producing them before courts, as the law requires. In most cases, those arrested remain in custody for weeks or months before being formally arrested or released. Others however are killed in so-called armed exchanges, and many remain “disappeared.”

This study examines the existence of criminal defamation and insult laws in the territory of the 57 participating States of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). In doing so, it offers a broad, comparative overview of the compliance of OSCE participating States’ legislation with international standards and best practices in the field of defamation law and freedom of expression.

READ AND DOWNLOADThis study analyses current trends in civil defamation and privacy cases in Hungary involving the media and summarises key challenges for freedom of the press and expression. Written by Hungarian media lawyer Bea Bodrogi, the study examined 250 court decisions related to civil protection of 'personality rights', an area in Hungarian law that includes defamation, privacy and personal image.

Freedom Forum has issued a review of Nepal's National Mass Communications Policy 2016. Among others, FF says the policy fails to articulate constitutional provisions relating to freedom of expression and mass communication. The policy, they said, also seems to promote centralided regulation, instead of self-regulation.

The Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV) in 2016 maintained its control over all public affairs and punished those who challenged its monopoly on power. Authorities restricted basic rights, including freedom of speech, opinion, association, and assembly. All religious groups had to register with the government and operate under surveillance. Bloggers and activists faced daily police harassment and intimidation, and were subject to arbitrary house arrest, restricted movement, and physical assaults.

Malaysia's human rights situation continued to deteriorate in 2016, with human rights defenders, activists, political opposition figures, and journalists facing harassment and politically motivated prosecution. Those criticising the administration of Prime Minister Najib Razak or commenting on the government's handling of the 1 Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) corruption scandal have been particular targets.

Authorities continue to use sedition and criminal defamation laws to prosecute citizens who criticise government officials or oppose state policies. In a blow to free speech, the government in 2016 argued before the Supreme Court in favour of retaining criminal penalties for defamation. The court upheld the law.

After already cracking down on freedom of information in recent years, President Erdoğan has taken advantage of the abortive coup d’état and the state of emergency in effect since 20 July to silence many more of his media critics, not only Gülen movement media and journalists but also, to a lesser extent, Kurdish, secularist and left-wing media.

This publication presents the findings of the media development assessment in Mongolia that began in 2012 to determine the state of the media in the country. The assessment was based on the UNESCO/IPDC Media Development Indicators (MDIs), an internationally recognized analytical tool used to provide detailed overviews of national media landscapes and related media development priorities.

“After the initial optimism during the Euromaidan movement, many journalists have become disillusioned. They are faced with the triple challenge of the war in the Eastern part of the country, the economic crisis and the digitalization of mass media.”

An officer of the Myanmar army recently filed a criminal complaint against two journalists for allegedly sowing disunity among the military. Even though mediation by the Press Council caused the military to withdraw the case, this incident demonstrates how the military continues to throw its weight to get back at what it perceives as negative publicity.

The government uses draconian laws such as the sedition provisions of the penal code, the criminal defamation law, and laws dealing with hate speech to silence dissent. These laws are vaguely worded, overly broad, and prone to misuse, and have been repeatedly used for political purposes against critics at the national and state level.

IFEX publishes original and member-produced free expression news and reports. Some member content has been edited by IFEX. We invite you to contact [email protected] to request permission to reproduce or republish in whole or in part content from this site.