This chapter will explore the limits and possibilities of narratives in which individuals turn to language to communicate the inexpressibility of experiences they have endured. The central dilemma for many survivors of trauma is that they must tell their stories, and yet their stories cannot be told. Traumatic experiences often defy understanding; testimony of those who have survived can be marked by what is not there: coherence, structure, meaning, comprehensibility. The actual emplotment of trauma testimony into conventional narrative configurations — contained in time- transforms them into something which they are not: experiences which are endowed with a particular wholeness, which occurred in the past, and which have now ended. The paper concludes with a discussion of the relationship between language and silence in traumatic testimony.

Andrews, M. 2017. Popular Representation of East Germany: Whose History is It? in: Meretoja, Hanna and Davis, Colin (ed.) Storytelling and Ethics: Literature, Visual Arts and the Power of Narrative Routledge. pp. 174-190

Andrews, M. 2003. Continuity and discontinuity of East German identity following the fall of the Berlin Wall: A case study. in: Gready, P (ed.) Cultures of Political Transition: Memory, Identity and Voice Pluto Press.

Andrews, M. 1997. Fighting for the finest image we have of her: Patriotism and Oppositional Politics. in: Bar-Tal, Daniel and Staub, Ervin (ed.) Patriotism in the life of individuals and nations Chicago Nelson-Hall.