Patriotic Democrats, Perversely Pragmatic AND Doggedly Resisting the Vichys, DINOs, Blue Dogs, Triangulators, and DLC Accommodationists.
And Still Dogging Joe Lieberman Until He's Festering in His Political Grave, of course.

Saturday, June 14, 2008

McCain: "The Rights of the Unborn Are As Important as the Rights of the Born."

In a "virtual town hall" Saturday designed specifically to boost his standing with independents and disaffected Hillary Clinton supporters, John McCain did his best to project a moderate, bipartisan image - but wound up enunciating policy stances that sharply conflict with positions held by Clinton -- and by most women, and by most Democrats -- on such things as women's right to choose, gay rights, the composition of the Supreme Court, America's role in using force overseas, and even the importance of intelligence and academic success in a good President. Instead of effectively wooing social moderates, McCain instead has clearly delineated some significant differences between his views and those normally considered "moderate" -- and may have given those voters who were thinking of sitting out the November election, or of crossing party lines to vote for him, some new and compelling reasons to actively oppose his election instead:

McCain on Roe v. Wade:

"Roe v. Wade, we obviously will have a disagreement. I think it was a bad decision."

McCain on abortion rights:

"[W]e have to change the culture of America. We have to convince people of our view that the rights of the unborn are as important as the rights of the born."

McCain on medically necessary late-term abortions:

"I am unalterably opposed to partial birth abortion."

McCain on the two or more Supreme Court appointments the next President is likely to make:

"I would find people along the lines of Justice Roberts."

"I wouldn't have selected Justice Ginsberg or Justice Breyer."

"I believe that interpretation of the Constitution, and only that, should be the criteria for Supreme Court justices."

McCain on gay rights and "don't ask, don't tell":

"Don't ask, don't tell: I want to rely on the advice and counsel of our military leaders. As President ... I will ask the Joint Chiefs of Staff to go back and review that and other policies to see whether those policies are appropriate, and I do rely on them to a large degree because they're the ones we entrust the leadership of the lives of our young men and women in our military. And I'm sure you may have a disagreement with that policy."

McCain on his own intelligence:

"You don't have to be real smart. I stood fifth from the bottom of my class at the naval academy, which shows in America anything is possible."

McCain's on what makes America great:

"We're the only country in the world that has over time sent our young Americans to shed our most precious asset - American blood - in defense of someone else's freedom."

I'll supplement this post later with more details, and with audio when it becomes available - but for Clinton supporters wondering what the effects on America would be if they either voted for McCain in November or simply stayed home and allowed him to be elected, just the few quotations given above - again, delivered in a setting designed to woo social moderates, not extreme conservatives - may be a powerful indication of how deeply reactionary a McCain administration is likely to be.

I tend to think that the DNC talking point that McCain would be "a third Bush term" is oversimplistic. On the other hand, though, in just one public appearance McCain has announced that he is pro-life, anti-Roe v. Wade (and other privacy rights), would appoint Supreme Court justices just like those that Bush appointed, is blindly instead of wisely patriotic and doesn't know his history (America is the ONLY country that's ever shed blood in defense of someone else's freedom?!?), and is dismissive of his own poor grades in a superb university that his family connections got him into. If that's not "Bush III," I don't know what is.

Anyone who thinks Obama is running against the pro-choice, fiscally conservative, socially moderate John McCain that we all respected in 2000 had better check behind the house for pods, because the John McCain of 2008 is nothing like the straight-talking "maverick" we used to know. And anyone who feels estranged from the Democratic Party by the unfortunate divisiveness of the primary season should look very, very carefully at John McCain - ver. 200.8 - before indulging any shortsighted inclination not to cast their vote for the Democratic alternative next November.

24 comments:

"You don't have to be real smart. I stood fifth from the bottom of my class at the naval academy, which shows in America anything is possible.""

Hah. Reminds one of Reagan's idiocies a bit. You don't have to be smart; just be a go-getter, know the right people, wave the flag, get the right photo-ops etc.

Unfortunately, I believe many Obama supporters have tilted towards vichy-cratism (McCainism is more like fascism itself, though of the Robert Heinlein/WF Buckley heroic sort, slightly more nauseating than say Mussolini). Vichy-crats are in a sense machiavellian: they insist the Dem must win at any cost, so anything goes, even appearing like conservatives (like BO shaking hands with creationists, questioning the First Amendment, quoting Reagan, talking tough on terrorism, war, etc. Hillary of course did that to some extent as well).

I believe any authentic progressive or Dem. should object to that tactic, even ones who felt (rightly or wrongly) that there may have been some justification for the IWE. That's still up for grabs, but at the very least Dems should continue to push for a more thorough investigation of the IWE (I tend to think Bush/Cheney/Rice/Rumsfeld ran with a few scant traces of WMDs, and blew it way out of proportion when war-fever was rolling). Obama himself now sounds committed to continuing the war effort, at least to some degree. Perhaps a rally for "Don't Vote for either" might do something.

Come on guys (and gals), is a baby really human or not? If you think you can kill in the womb, is any one safe? What if the public opinion deems old people a financial drain on the government who is left to foot the bill for their care? Or "different people" as unhappy segments that are a threat to the rest of society!

The "freedom of choice" is often none other than a grisly avoidance of the consequences of extra marital sex. or a cover for an older male abusing and under age girl.