So good. Amazing what a dynamic pass-rusher can do for the whole defense. Miller is so disruptive, it is scary.

Scary that he's just a 23 year old second year player. I don't know where he stands in the DPOY race, but two of the best and most disruptive defensive players in the league right now are 23 year old second year players.

We got like 4th string corners out there, of course we suck (this game) on defense, Brady or any good QB would take advantage with the weapons and offensive line the Pats have.

I'm not talking about the Indy defense. Our 1st and 2nd string corners suck, so of course the 3rd and 4th string corners suck. We've ust given the Patriots way too much unnecessary help. They're too good to give them three non-offensive TD's.

I don't think this is the real Colts either. We're usually good on special teams, and Luck usually plays better than this. Our defense today was not an idication of what it is for reasons I said earlier.

We just got whooped by the best org. in the NFL at their place. All their is to it.

Yeah, Indy isn't a very good 6-3 team, and I think the Patriots are better than their record indicates, but that hinges on their defense making plays like they have today. Luck and Wayne have covered a lot of flaws in some close games against weaker competition. I didn't think, though, it'd be 45-17 or whatever because New England scored three non-offensive TD's.

yeah there were a lot of flags, 90% of them by your CB Scrifes, but one of the worst calls in that game was "Taunting" call on Ratliff that I don't understand...not sure wtf that was all about, but without that flag there woulf have been no OT.

I also agree that call didn't warranting a legit "taunting" flag. We've all seen much worse and it never gets called.

Nonetheless, it's more-than-obvious if there was a biased crew, we'd all easily know who the favored team was, and with Dallas' season on the line, it's obvious. The 'Boys got their win, and that's what matters... but I think overall, Browns deserved the game.