"Great men are almost always bad men," wrote Lord Acton. From their
badness you can learn much about the flaws inherent in the mass of people.
Disease is as instructive as health, since it tells people to flee the
former and seek the latter. Unfortunately, when it comes to politics, many
people can't tell the difference between the two, and in fact see disease
as health, unholiness as holiness, war as peace, ignorance as strength.

One of those great but bad men was Adolf Hitler, who has been described as
"half genius, half insane." He had a profound understanding of human
nature, and the cesspool known as politics, in order to get to the
position he did. Knowing what he said, and how he achieved what he did,
warns people to be on guard against other amoral, power-crazed individuals
like him.

One thing Hitler said was, "To be a leader means to be able to move
masses." This is not a good thing, contrary to those who think it might
be. There is nothing good about it at all. It means one charismatic man,
or a very small group of calculating but reasonable-sounding people, can
move millions of gullible people. ("The worst crimes were dared by a few,
willed by more and tolerated by all." ~ Tacitus)

Such naiveté can lead to catastrophes such as the battle of
Stalingrad , in which one million to two million people died. How could
essentially two menStalin and Hitlercon so many people into dying
for them? They had to have been charismatic and charming on the surface,
but underneath they were something out of an Aesop's fable about ruthless
wolves and dim-witted sheep.

Thomas Sowell, understanding all of this, wrote, "Most wars are started by
well-fed people with time on their hands to dream up half-baked ideologies
or grandiose ambitions, and to nurse real or imagined grievances."

Americans are just as gullible and prone to being conned as everyone else
in the world. You'd think a country founded on liberty and distrust of the
government wouldn't make a cult out of such statists as Lincoln or FDR or
Kennedy or Bush or Obama, but it has happened. Much of the creation of
these cults has been done by people who should know betterhistorians
and the clergyboth of whom should know how foolish the mass of people
are, and how one bad man can move them, usually right over a cliff.

"Only force rules. Force is the first law" is something else Hitler wrote.
There are only two ways to get what you want: honestly (the Economic Means
of the free market) or dishonestly (the Political Means of force and
fraud). Hitler is talking strictly about the Political Meanslying and
murder and theft and war. Only a consummate and completely amoral
politician could make such a statement, and only somebody completely
deluded could think that any society that is based on force and fraud can
survive.

Richard Maybury, author of such books as
Whatever
Happened to Justice? and
Whatever
Happened to Penny Candy? points out that no society can
survive unless it follows what he calls the Two Laws: "Do all that you
have agreed to do" and "Do not encroach on other persons or their
property." In a nutshell, do not engage in fraud or force. Do not engage
in the Political Means.

While most people understand individuals cannot engage in force and fraud,
they believe governments can engage in the Political Means with no
untoward effects. They lack even the acumen of the pirate in St. Augustine
's "City of God" : "Because I do it with one small ship, I am called a
terrorist. You do it with a whole fleet and are called an emperor."

The end result of the Political Means, when practiced by governments, is
war, and as Ludwig von Mises noticed, "Economically considered, war and
revolution are always bad business." That's an understatement. A bit more
vivid is something else he wrote: "The worst evils which mankind has ever
had to endure were inflicted by bad governments."

Everything that Hitler wrote showed an understanding of the gullibility
and imperfection of human nature, of peoples' desire to belong to a group
(the basis of fascism), their equally strong desire to find a (supposedly
hostile and insane) enemy on which to blame their problems, and the belief
in force and fraud as the final arbiters: "The victor will never be asked
if he told the truth"; "How fortunate for leaders that men do not think";
"Always before God and the world, the stronger has the right to carry
through what he wills."

In a sense, these great but bad men are practitioners of Black Magic, who
cast spells, through the use of words, to charm the susceptible masses
into believing Bad is Goodinto believing it is acceptable, indeed
necessary, for governments to eternally engage in force and fraud,
otherwise evil will overwhelm them. Their evil, as evil almost always
does, especially politically, disguises itself as good; Black Magic
masquerades as White Magic. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn understood this when he
wrote, "Violence can only be concealed by a lie, and the lie can only be
maintained by violence."

The neocon cancers that had infested the U.S. administration during both
of Bush's terms took a few pages out of Hitler's writings, and tried to
put them into effect.This vanishing small group of amoral and power-mad
traitors, using words as charms, attempted to con the mass of unthinking
people into believing they had an insane, evil, and implacable enemy who
was out to utterly destroy them. The torrent of words they poured out
boiled down to basically one thing: might makes right.

Even today, although Bush and the neocons are gone from the federal
government, we're still involved in the two wars they started.

"Might makes right." No society has ever survived believing that. It may
be the year 2010 AD, but with their belief in magic and their
susceptibility to being ensorcelled by charms and spells, people might as
well be stuck in 2010 BC.