Apple both a winner and loser after FBI gets into iPhone, UB cyberlaw expert says

Public now sees that the iPhone is vulnerable in some sense, Mark Bartholomew says

“Apple might have won the battle in court, but there is a public relations concern now. Apple took a very robust public stand showing their brand was about privacy and now we have a very public exposing of the basic fact that iPhones aren’t Swiss bank accounts. Information can be exposed and that calls their brand into question a bit.”

Mark Bartholomew, professor of law

University at Buffalo

BUFFALO, N.Y. – On the bright side, Apple was not forced
to make their engineers write code that would allow the FBI to
break into their devices.

On the downside, though, a third party was able to get into
Apple’s iPhones, showing the world these devices are
vulnerable, says Mark Bartholomew, University at Buffalo professor
of law.

“Apple might have won the battle in court, but there is a
public relations concern now,” says Bartholomew, who studies
encryption and cyberlaw. “Apple took a very robust public
stand showing their brand was about privacy and now we have a very
public exposing of the basic fact that iPhones aren’t Swiss
bank accounts. Information can be exposed and that calls their
brand into question a bit.”

While Bartholomew says he does not expect a sudden sales crash,
there will likely be a public relations fallout.

When Apple came out so strongly in favor of privacy against the
FBI it was more than just based on principle, he says. It was a
business strategy.

“There is no mistaking the fact that Apple was opposed to
the FBI’s goals, but now we have to wonder just how
vulnerable these phones are,” he says. “For a company
that spent the last month or so talking about their brand being all
about privacy, there will be some questioning of that.”

Other questions remain, too, after the government officially
withdrew from its battle against Apple Monday. The Justice
Department withdrew its legal action against Apple after a third
party was able to gain access into the iPhone used by Syed Farook,
who carried out the shooting in San Bernardino.

There is still the larger debate between personal privacy and
national security.

“Congress will likely weigh in on this larger question,
and that is a good thing,” he says. “Congress is in the
best position to weigh the differences between privacy and
security, rather than take it on a case-by-case basis. Congress is
more likely to weigh in now than before this occurred.”

As far as Apple’s potential next move? Bartholomew says
the company doesn’t have much of a legal leg to stand on in
terms of finding out how the third party gained access to the
iPhone.

While Apple can claim they are trying to protect against bad
actors and identity theft, he says, the FBI will say this is a
security need.

Media Contact Information

Rachel Stern no longer works for University Communications. To
contact UB's media relations staff, call 716-645-6969 or visit our
list of current university
media contacts. Sorry for the inconvenience.