The journal acceptance review process involves a minimum of three double-blind peer reviews,
where both (i) the reviewer is not aware of the identities of the authors and
(ii) the authors are not aware of the identities of the reviewers.
The initial reviews happen before EDSIGCON.
At that point papers are divided into award papers (top 15%), top journal papers (top 30%),
unsettled papers, and paper submitted after the deadline for journal consideration.
The unsettled papers are subjected to a second round of blind peer review to establish whether
they will be accepted to the journal or not.
Those papers that are deemed of sufficient quality are accepted for publication in the ISEDJ journal.