Monkey Tennis – how can we make the work we want, rather than what we think someone else wants?

Devoted and Disgruntled Archivist

Monkey Tennis – how can we make the work we want, rather than what we think someone else wants?

Convener(s): Ellan Parry

Participants: the piece of paper with names on it got lost. Sorry. Contact me if you want your name to be recorded. The only names I got were Rob Haughton, the artistic director of Donkey Work and Andrew Mulligan.

Summary of discussion, conclusions and/or recommendations:

In an episode of Alan Partridge, he attempts to pitch increasingly craven and desperate ideas for television programmes, culminating in ‘monkey tennis’ – I feel like I and others, in attempting to second guess what funders, the arts council, producers, venues, a potential, possibly imaginary audience etc want, are in danger of creating monkey tennis. Is there room for creating the work we want to make first? Or should we be led by market factors? How do you prove a demand for your work? How many people lie on their funding forms about benefit to community, inclusion and other arts council buzz words? How many badly run workshops are inflicted on luckless children and teenagers because a ‘youth outreach’ or ‘workshop’ programme was the only way someone could get the funding they needed to produce what they wanted?

Marketing – Rob Haughton works in marketing in commercial sector, wants to move into theatre, raised issues surrounding marketing – targeting audiences – is targeting audiences putting the cart before the horse? What happened to ‘build it and they will come’? – it was suggested that this was also a legacy of the arts council funding process, proving demand for work – how accountable should we be? How accountable can you be in theatre – that’s to say, how do you prove that something was good, was worthwhile? Therefore the almost arbitary tick-box approach of ‘inclusion’ and ‘community benefit’…

Art for Art’s sake – it was argued that theatre is the only art form which cannot justify or sustain this idea – the fact that it has a live audience negates this? It must have an entertainment, if not a commercial obligation – but how can theatre grow and develop if it can’t produce work that is purely about experimenting with the form? Is it fair or right that the government, through the arts council process of validating work through a social responsibility remit, has essentially legislated against art for art’s sake in the theatre?

The idea of within the arts council a voice to speak for the audience, and a voice to speak for the artist was floated, which led to the suggestion that these voices may sometimes be in opposition – a dialogue and a negotiation between the needs of both…

The benefit of working within a smaller area than London – Bristol and Manchester were examples – greater access to space, tighter and more supportive communities, the potential of building a loyal local audience etc

the London fringe was seen as being exclusive, and overly ‘official’, difficult to get involved in..

someone suggested there should be a law restricting the number of artists per civilian within a city or country.

Someone talked about dance companies in France being decentralized, companies effectively made to belong to a particular town or area

Practical ways of getting money: If we’re disillusioned or frustrated with arts council and charitable funding, there’s the corporate sector – firms with ‘corporate responsibility’ sections of their budget – the artistic director of Donkey Work described his experience of getting money from law and accountancy firms.

A big problem is the initial capital needed to put on work, even scratch work, in order to develop it, get funding, get work seen…. the biggest expense or problem is often the venue – the idea of a ‘free’ (subscription run perhaps?) venue was proposed where work could be presented quickly and flexibly – what can we take from the open mic format of music or stand-up? Andrew Mulligan was amongst the participants who were keen to take this idea forward – contact he or I (Ellan Parry) in order to talk more about this….

How we keep in touch

As well as contacting you about administrative issues connected to your report submissions, donations or event bookings, we would love your consent to tell you about upcoming Devoted & Disgruntled events, and Improbable news and productions. We won't share your details with third parties. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

We will normally only ever contact you via email. However, if you prefer to be contacted in another way, please select channels below.

If you'd rather we didn't contact you at all, please leave all channel options blank.

Your Privacy

We store all your personal details securely. We'll use your data to communicate with you in the ways you have specified, and may use data for analysis to make sure we're providing the best service possible. for more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Li-E Chen is recruiting for a freelance Curator to support her next three to four years of artistic development that has come out of her recent One-Year R&D Opera Project: A Silent Opera on the Life and Art of Tehching Hsieh 2017-2018.

A range of views and experiences: how to sustain work within the current funding structures and views on future problems. And a proposal via Equity for a future new structure based on Provision and Distribution of arts, on providing work to a good level for those trained and aspiring to work in the the arts, and on properly paid work rather than on the restrictive "portfolio" and "excellence".

How can theatres commissioning devised work + work created through experimental processes
better support and facilitate the practical realisation of that work?
A proxy session called by Ellan Parry, hosted at DandD14 by Kath Burlinson

We considered the challenges of building and sustaining audiences for non-traditional theatre -- not just for one visiting show, but for an artform.
Examples of poor practice were considered, along with discussion of why some presenters regularly achieve successes.
The need to understand this question in a national context, and take action to deal with it, was recognised as a desire to achieve a cultural shift. For this to work, it will be necessary to begin with exciting marketing teams i

I frequently find myself deeply frustrated and personally conflicted with how theatre marketing (in general) is planned and executed, and how it may compromise the artistic work. This is how I’m dealing with it.

Northampton is a town whose High St is slowly changing and dying, shops like M and S and BHS have closed, leaving big gaps of boarded up shops and empty windows. How can we do something positive to bring people back into the centre of town through creative activity? Helping people to believe in their town again.

Part of the Fringe Central Programme for Fringe participants. Artist, technician, venue staff or audience member – you’ll know the pains as well as the joys of the Fringe. This is your chance to help make the Fringe work better for the very people who give it reason. You. Bring your own questions and ideas – you set the agenda and nothing is censored. An open space – come for as much or as little as you want.

Sign up for our newsletter

First name

Last name

Email

By signing up to our newsletter, you are giving your consent for us to contact you via email with news of Devoted & Disgruntled events and other projects run by Improbable. For more details on how we hold your data and how we are complying with GDPR, please see the Privacy Policy.