Stuart,
SubTopic: Informative/Normative
I made a small mistake ... :(
In:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0329.html
[[
Stuart:
> 9) Section 7 Fragment Identifiers.
>
> This section (and many others) is not explicitly labelled as normative or
> informative (both deginations are used elsewhere). I assume this is an
> informative section, but I think it would be helpful to be explicit in this
> case rather than leave any doubt.
Jeremy:
I believe we intended it as informative.
Accepted.
]]
We have deleted the last occurrance of the word "informative" in a section
heading with the resolution of the social meaning issue. The other occurrence
of the word informative is in section 1
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-concepts-20030123/#section-Introduction
The sentence being:
[[
Within this document, normative sections are explicitly labelled as such.
Explicit notes are informative.
]]
I hope that that sentence adequately addresses this concern, and no change is
necessary.
Please reply if this is OK.
Jeremy