Hi folks.
I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting
Through The Matrix on the 19th of October 2012. Newcomers, I suggest you make good
use of the website cuttingthroughthematrix.com.
You’ll find, I don’t know how many audios are up there now, there’s well over a
thousand audios, and always growing. I
go through the system, the big system you're born into and explain the guys
behind it, the guys who gave you your reality.
And they really did give you your reality because they hired thousands
and thousands of think tanks and specialists, to work round the clock, every year,
for the last hundred years basically, to guide society the way it should be
guided into the perfect society, to suit the Masters, you see. It’s well
documented by those involved. The
history is definitely there and it cannot be denied. So help yourself to the
audios there and find out what’s all behind it. You’ll find most of your
reality is nonsense, including even your behavior in fact, and the modes that
you adopt in your culture because these guys give you your culture. They run
the media, the entertainment industry, everything, to make sure you’re the
ideal, basically, airhead for your era. And they’ve done it to us all,
generation by generation. It’s all a science, you see. And find out how it’s
done, who’s behind it, and the big players who came out and published their
books about it, that were heavily involved in the whole process.

Also too, remember you are the audience that
bring me to you. I don’t bring on advertisers as guests who are there to sell
their products. I don’t have shares in companies that sell products. All I have
are the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com to help me tick over. If
you’d like to help me out, buy them or you can donate, and you can go into
cuttingthroughthematrix.com to find out how to do it. [Order and donation options listed above.] And straight donations, remember, are
awfully, awfully welcome in these austere times. I’m not building an empire
here; I’m just trying to get the truth out.

And what a truth it is, as we go through the
farce of politics, which is just a Punch and Judy show for the public. You
don’t vote a new guy in. You vote the old bunch out, you’re sick of them.
That’s how it works. And you go from left to right and left to right,
and you always vote them out after a time, you’re so sick of them. And that
stops you having rebellions every so often. Of course, the politicians are just
that, they are the front men put in; as their own historian said at the Council
on Foreign Relations, every President and
Prime Minister has been a member of this organization for a hundred years, at
the top, across the world, by the way. Which means that they’re just the
show men and they’re there to take the rotten tomatoes and all the curses and
all the rest of it; that’s their job. There’s one agenda. This one agenda steamrolls ahead with everyone involved
in it, because there’s no other agenda, just the one.

We’re going into the stage now where we’re
completely global, as you know, and we’re selling off assets across our own
countries to overseas. That was planned
out in the 1990s at the big two-year meeting they held in France. Every country attended and they drafted up
this legislation so that any outsider, any country could invest in your
country. And you have to go by their
rules and their paychecks, etc., not
your own. If you try to deny them, they’re allowed through the World Trade
Organization to sue your country for billions of dollars and pounds. That’s
actually happened to some countries already. So, it’s the selloff of nations,
under the guise of unifying the world, under a global system. And that is your
future. That really is your future. They’ve been teaching students for years,
at some of the better universities, the higher up ones, the Ivy League, to
learn Chinese, for instance, and they have been. Many of them have been brought
up with Chinese nannies for the last 20 years, because the future will be for
them, as China dominates the world, as it’s intended to. It was planned to do,
not by China but the ones who already rule the world. Back with more after this
break.

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The
Matrix. It really is such an amazing
system we live through, because, you understand, there’s only one system.
There’s one system and you see the same M.O. wherever you go. You know it’s the
one system. Canada, Britain and other countries, after that 1990s meeting, when
they went through the selling off of assets and infrastructure to private,
overseas investors, they all rampaged ahead and sold off the water supplies,
the roads, highways, everything. Rothschild did it in Britain; he put forth the
bill to privatize the roads. And
everything skyrockets in price, electricity, everything.

Well, Australia’s doing the same thing, because
they’re catching up now, rather quickly too. This is Western Australia and it
says…

Assets
sell-off worth 'tens of billions' to WA

au.news.yahoo.com / Shane Wright and Daniel Mercer /
October 19, 2012

The State Government
should sell to the nation's superannuation funds, most of Perth's electricity
system, all ports and even convert major roads to tollways under a plan to
slash debt (Alan: ...the same excuse, eh.) and free-up
cash for desperately needed (A: ...magnates. Sorry, it says projects here...) projects.

Infrastructure
Australia believes Verve, Western Power, Fremantle Ports, the Water Corporation
and Forest Products Commission should be sold in a move that would reap the
State tens of billions of dollars.

Verve could be worth
$2.5 billion to the State Government, Fremantle Ports $500 million and the
Water Corporation more than $5 billion.
(A: It’s going for a song.)

The authority
believes by selling publicly owned assets (A: ...publicly owned assets…THE authority
believes... Understand the wording of
this? the standard wording… THE authority believes by selling publicly owned assets, that’s supposed
to be all yours…), the nation's infrastructure deficit could be turned
around while the assets themselves would be better run and at a lower cost. (A:
...as we all get gouged, as they privatize it and skyrocket the prices.
We’ve all found that out elsewhere. It doesn’t stop the same con, though, you
see. It’s a worldwide con, it has to go on. It’s one agenda.)

It follows a
Productivity Commission report this week that urged the privatisation of WA's
electricity network, saying it would help keep a lid on power prices to
consumers. (A: Now, they’ve already told
us, at many world meetings, that we have to pay about 10 times more for power
than you’re paying right now. It’s already started in Ontario; they’ve told us
that from the power company, the private power company that it was sold off
too.)

The Infrastructure
Australia report was prompted by continuing high levels of government ownership
and complaints, particularly by industry groups, that States have been unable
to keep up with providing infrastructure necessary for the economy to operate
productively. (A: So they go into the reasons
why they’ve got to sell it off, basically. This is the con game.)

At the same time,
Australian super funds hold more than $1 trillion in assets.

National
infrastructure co-ordinator Michael Deegan said States could sell many assets
and sink proceeds into schools, hospitals and roads. (A: What’s the point in doing that if they’re
going to privatize the roads? Hmm?)

"Governments
around Australia need to explore new methods of financing and developing the
infrastructure needed to improve national productivity," Mr Deegan said.

It’s all about
productivity, you see. That’s our job in life, is to be producers, according to
the United Nations. Then you find this
one here, about Canada and it says here…

Chairman
Harper and the Chinese Sell-Out

Andrew Nikiforuk, 11 Oct 2012, TheTyee.ca

By Nov. 1 three of
China's national oil companies will have more power to shape Canada's energy
markets as well as challenge the politics of this country than Canadians
themselves. (A: And they go on to say...) And you can thank Prime Minister
Stephen Harper for this economic treason. (A: No.
You see, as I say, that deal was struck in the 90s, for two years; they
kept it out of the mainstream media as best they could. The CBC did touch on it
at one point and they let one person in, who was a communist from Canada, and
only asked, nothing about Canadians, she says, we
just hope you treat the Chinese workers well, in your own country, and
that was what she really went for. But it was a signed deal then; they tried to
keep the lid on this. Every country was involved, long before Harper came
along.)

The new agreement
will not only support more foreign takeovers of Canada's natural resources, but
pave the way for CNOOC's dramatic $15-billion purchase of Nexen.

That controversial
deal, which the majority of ordinary Canadians oppose, represents the
largest-ever overseas takeover of any firm by a Chinese national oil company.

Both the trade deal
and Nexen sell-off prove that no one betrays Canadian interests better than a
right-wing prime minister (A: It wouldn’t matter who was in, because the
left wing are, they all signed it too. Actually, they came up with the idea for
the French two-year meeting.) beholden to the interests of Big Oil and the
myths of free trade.

Now every literate
Canadian recognizes that Harper, the libertarian economist, has been flying
kites with pipeline lobbyists funded by China's national oil companies as well
as the one-per-centers now ruling China for some time now.

Given that oil
consumption in the United States is steadily dropping and that the incompetent
petro state of Alberta has flooded the market with bitumen due to bad planning,
low royalties and sheer stupidity, Harper is frantically trying to save his
Tory cohorts and their special petroleum interests by peddling bitumen to Asian
refiners at any cost. He’s prepared to sell out Canada in the process. (A: Well as I say, it was his turn to get in,
and carry on with the same agenda.)

In fact
"Chairman Harper" (and that's what members of his own party are
calling him) crafted an Omnibus Bill last spring that cancelled federal science
programs, gutted critical environmental legislation, made it easier to pollute
water, centralized federal power, diminished protection for endangered species
and attacked environmental groups. The bill not only makes it easier to build
Northern Gateway but to serve some of the least transparent and most corrupt
corporations in China: Sinopec and CNOOC.

But Harper's Omnibus
Bill, which declared Canada’s formal entry into the ranks of dysfunctional
petro states, was but window dressing for the Canada-China Foreign Investment
Promotion and Protection Act (FIPPA). (A:
The mainstream have hardly touched that, Canada-China Foreign Investment
Promotion and Protection Act, FIPPA.) It's the most significant trade deal
since NAFTA, but you won't read much about it in the national press. Given its
deplorable content Harper appropriately inked the massive give-away in
Vladivostok last month and then quietly tabled the deal in Ottawa without so
much as a press release.

Osgoode law
professor Gus Van Harten, an expert on such international doings, quickly found
out why. After reading the brief document, he declared it a travesty and a
formidable assault on Canada's democratic traditions. (A: I wonder what they
were?) For starters the deal gives
Chinese investors more rights and protections than Canadian entrepreneurs could
ever win in China's incredibly corrupt markets.

Moreover the deal
"allows Chinese companies to sue Canada outside of Canadian courts. (A:
That’s through the WTO.) Remarkably, the lawsuits can proceed behind closed
doors. This shift to secrecy reverses a longstanding policy of the Canadian
government."

Appallingly, the
treaty would give Sinopec, one of the big Chinese backers of the Northern
Gateway pipeline, the right to sue the government of British Columbia if it
blocks the project. Sinopec could also demand that only Chinese labour and
materials be used on the pipeline. (A: Well, they’re already bringing in, for the
mines they’re putting up in Canada, they’re bringing in mainland Chinese; I
read that last week.) Moreover the treaty gives Chinese state owned
companies "the right to full protection and security from public
opposition."

The agreement, like
all bad deals, comes wrapped in totalitarian paper. The deal does not require
provincial consent. It comes without any risk-benefit analysis. And it can be
ratified into law without parliamentary debate. The more Harper wants to do
business with China, the more he acts like another tank in Tiananmen Square.
Barring a revolt within Harper's own party, the trade deal automatically
becomes law on Nov. 1.

To date Elizabeth
May, leader of the Green Party, is the only politician demanding an emergency
debate in parliament on a treaty that will deliver "reduced
sovereignty" and "reduced democracy" and all "for more
Chinese ownership of Canada's resources."

Well, it makes no
difference, because as I say, the left-wing, look at the left-wing in
Australia, and how well they’re doing with their deals there with the Chinese
too. So forget this
left-wing/right-wing stuff; that’s the con. It’s one agenda and any politician,
of any party, whenever they’re in power, is going to continue the same agenda.
They’ve been doing it since the 90s, by the way, as I say, for those who don’t
know. And then this one here, it’s another
one too.

In two weeks, Prime Minister Harper could pass the most secretive and
sweeping trade deal of a generation. - leadnow.ca/stop-fipa

It’s about the same thing. And it’s really a
protest if you want to add your name to it, you can protest to it, and just
send it in… for all the good it will do anyway. As I say, every country in the
world signed on to this deal, in the West I should say, including the Far East,
Australia, New Zealand and so on. They always had a plan to sell off all your
assets, and so-called publicly owned assets.
Not that you really own anything at all.

And this article here, it’s from Scotland
actually, that really is the test bed for the new man and woman, you see. I
think there won’t be any men really; they’ll have a new name for them, after
they’ve finished. I’ve mentioned this article before, this particular topic,
and it says…

(home-education.biz/forum/57679-post112.html)

Inverclyde Council
has taken Girfec (A: Girfec came out from Sarkozy and a whole
bunch of them who were involved in creating this new society, birth to death
monitoring, behaviorism is involved where you have to see
psychiatrists/psychologists from childhood… ALL children by the way. They come
into the homes and study all the parents, and to train the new generation the
way that they want them to be: the perfect little, you know clones.) to a
new level, it believes. The council has adapted the Girfec Shanarri well-being
indicators (A: It sounds nice that, well-being, eh...) to get it right not
just for every child but every citizen and community as well (see chart,
right). (A: It’s got a chart to show
you how it works.)

Angela Edwards (A:
...and I can’t find anything on this woman, her background, or
whatever.), the council’s head of inclusive education, culture and
corporate policy, (A: Now, think about this…) the council’s
head of inclusive education, culture and corporate policy, explains:
“All authorities will be using the well-being indicators to plan in children’s
services, but we don’t just want a nurturing class or school (A:
What’s a nurturing class? Is it something where they stick a tit in your
mouth, with milk in a bottle or something, you know, and you suck on it?),
we want a nurturing authority. (A: I can imagine that, that’s where they
splatter it all over your face when you go in to complain.) We adapted the
descriptors so they could be applied to the whole council.”

So whether the
council is planning a new road or refurbishing a museum, the well-being
indicators drive that planning.

“Any child who lives
in Inverclyde becomes a citizen of Inverclyde and lives in a community in
Inverclyde. It’s about trying to impact on that child’s whole life,” says Ms
Edwards. (A: So in other words it’s
about bringing you up from a baby basically, monitoring you the whole way, and
they come in with all their agencies if they think you’re wandering from the
designed path that you’re supposed to be on, and engineering a society. That’s
what it’s about, you see.)

The vision for a
nurturing Inverclyde is focusing on making Inverclyde a place which nurtures
all its citizens (A: ...BIG BROTHER... It’s actually Big Mama,
you know.) ensuring that everyone has an opportunity to have a good quality
of life, good mental and physical well-being (A: ...because they want to
check your mind all the time), getting it right for every child, citizen
and community.” (A: Back with more after this.)

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix,
talking about the big kaleidoscopic system we’re in, where we have lots of
bread and circuses, etc; most things really are bread and circuses. Your
politicians are bread and circuses; they take all the bread and give you a
circus. But the thing is, people never catch on to it because you see, they’re
not the bosses. The guys above them
are the bosses.

I’ve gone through the history of the Royal
Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations, across the
whole planet, set up by the big banking boys; that’s the ones who lent to
nations, the biggest money lenders, about 13 families. They set up their own
little club that eventually got a Royal Charter, so the Royal Institute of
International Affairs; and the Council on Foreign Relations across the rest of
the world. They decided to take over all the resources of the world, run it
properly; the wise men would run the world properly, all these tall guys. That’s where it’s all going. They draft up
all the amalgamations. They actually drafted up the amalgamation for Europe;
they did it, they admit that. They drafted up the plans for NAFTA; they came on
television in Canada and admitted it, openly. We don’t vote these guys in.
They’re a private organization, a private club, of incredibly wealthy people.
They own all the media. And we sit and just take it, of course. We watch this…
Most folk get sucked back into the politics again; it’s like a big circus when
it comes on, and that’s why it works all the time. You know, who are you going to vote for, that guy or
that guy. It’s just astonishing how
it works so well. I left politics a long time ago after I realized what it was,
and even then luckily I had never been in it.
So it’s rather transparent, when you realize there’s a big agenda run by
much bigger minds at the top.

They wanted an integrated world and they would
own all the natural resources through all their thousands of corporations, that
they own. You understand, for all the thousands of corporations out there, they
amalgamate them and amalgamate them, because you see, you’ve got to have
monopolization of anything, including the media; you even have that on
different radio hosts as well.
Monopolization, you knock all the rest of the competition out. And
they’ve done it all through business. And these are all front organizations,
with the major shareholders are the same guys who are the world’s money
lenders. It gives the appearance of
competition.

Also at the same time too, as they bring down
your culture into utter destruction, of your particular cultures... It’s all done as far as I’m concerned. It’s over with, step by step by step. It
didn’t take long at all. I’ve mentioned Jimmy Savile, for instance, at the BBC,
one of many pervs working there. It’s got a lifelong history of perversion at
the BBC. It’s generally little boys they’re into, but they’re trying to keep
that out as best as they can. They go on about Jimmy Savile, and no one knew,
of course, the ones who were all around him, because they can’t open up the can
of worms. Because you see, the British
government owns the BBC; it’s been the biggest communist propaganda agency out
there, forever. And they’ve put on the perverted stuff and deculturalized the
public into perversions, with all their terrible dramas and all the rest of it
over the years. This article here goes on about the…

Labour (A:
...government; Labour, or Liberal.)faces embarrassment over its calls for a
wide-ranging inquiry into Jimmy Savile as senior party figures have previously
called for the relaxation of child sex laws.

telegraph.co.uk / Martin Beckford, Home Affairs Editor
/ 17 Oct 2012

(A: You understand, Savile
wasn’t alone. There’s a lot of pervs above him all pushing for this inter-,
what they want to call, intergenerational sex. I’ve mentioned it many times. I
mentioned years ago, in fact, at least ’98 on the radio, that you will see live
sex performed on television, dramas, comedies and so on. Live sex, it’s coming. Step-by-step it’s
coming. And even child sex as well. That’s going to be mainstream. And there’ll
be no such word left as pedophilia, you see. That’s been agreed at world
meetings; I’ve mentioned the world meetings and went through them before.)

Harriet Harman, the
Opposition deputy leader, said the allegations that the late TV and radio
presenter abused dozens of young boys and girls had “cast a stain” on the BBC
and other trusted institutions. (A: Who trusts them?)

But at the time
Savile was at the height of his fame, Miss Harman was calling for the
relaxation of the law on child pornography. (A: This is the top politician for the
left-wings, you see.)

She was a leading
light in the pressure group now known as Liberty, which advocated the lowering
of the age of consent to 14. (A:
But they actually wanted it lower. See, you just lower it once, and you
lower it again until... you can go to babies, you know.)

The organisation,
then run by the Health Secretary under Tony Blair, Patricia Hewitt, even
counted among its affiliates a number of extreme pro-paedophilia groups whose
leaders were later jailed. (A:
They’re still there though, still out there.)

It means that any
independent public inquiry into the culture that allowed Savile to abuse
children for so long with impunity, could end up looking into the radical
left-wing demands for the liberalisation of child sex laws that were made in
the 1970s.

Tim Loughton, the
former children’s minister, said “It is rather eyebrow-raising to see Harriet
Harman’s newfound zeal for clamping down on sexual exploitation of children,
given that she was decidedly dodgy on the subject when she was part of an organisation
calling for the relaxation of these laws.
(A: These are top people running your government… Well, they’re not
running your governments. They run the low-down parts like the culture and
stuff.)

“What we are seeing
now is the result of a culture of complacency which has allowed celebrities and
others to cover up their crimes, and Harriet Harman must share some of the
blame for not taking these matters much more seriously.” (A: Now, I think you’d have to get even further
than that, and find out what’s in this woman’s head, that she was wanting child
sex and all the laws relaxed. What’s she into?
Huh? What’s she into? She
belonged to the groups, folks.)

As The Daily
Telegraph first disclosed in 2009, in the 1970s the extreme end of the sexual liberation
movement included groups who openly campaigned for the abolition of the age of
consent. The Paedophile Information Exchange and Paedophile Action for
Liberation affiliated themselves to the National Council for Civil Liberties (A:
You’d never imagine that was under that, National Council for Civil
Liberties was all a pedophilic run organization.), now known as
Liberty. (A: Liberty before puberty, I
guess they want to get pre-puberty as well. Back with more after this break.)

Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix,
reading about the pervs that run what you think is government, and what they’ve
been up to for an awful long time, as they destroy the cultures, for everybody,
you see. Again, actually they’re tied in with all the entertainment industry,
the BBC, etc., as they push their filth across the planet. And make things that
used to be abhorrent quite natural to do, you see; they always do it in a
different situation, and the music playing, as they rape children, and stuff
like that. Anyway it says here…

NCCL (A:
National Council for Civil Liberties, which was actually part of the
Pedophile Action for Liberation ...
Pedos for God’s sake.) complained to the press watchdog about their
treatment by tabloid newspapers and in one article admitted it had “plenty of
contact” with PIE (A: ...you know, the PIE, the Pedophile
Information Exchange, a piece of the pie…), and argued that children are
harmed by having to go to police and courts after (A: ...they’ve been raped by an
adult. Sorry, it says here…) a “mutual relationship with an adult”. (A:
That’s how they try to get round it, oh
it’s doing the children harm having to go through the police and complain about
this; it’s a ‘mutual relationship’.)

In 1976 the NCCL
submitted a response to the Government’s plans to reform sex laws that was
dubbed a Lolita’s Charter as it claimed “childhood sexual experiences,
willingly engaged in with an adult result in no identifiable damage”. (A: That was the big rage back then. They had it
in Canada too, by the way.)

The organisation
said that children as young as 14 should be able to consent to sex, to reduce
the “harmful effects of the present laws”. (A: ...which get the people who seduce and
pervert them, you know. It’s just astonishing what’s been going on, but folk
really… You can’t shock folk with this now because they’ve all been
contaminated, with watching all the rubbish on television.)

It went on to say it
is “logical” for the age of consent to be abolished but “we fear” it would not
be “politically possible”.

Miss Harman, then a
newly qualified solicitor, joined the group as legal officer two years later.

In April 1978 she
wrote the NCCL’s response to the Protection of Children Bill, which was put
before Parliament in order to tighten the laws on child pornography by banning
indecent images of under-16s.

It claimed that the
new law could lead to “damaging and absurd prosecutions” and “increase
censorship”. (A: Oh, we can’t have censorship.)

She suggested that
pornographic photographs or films of children should not be considered indecent
unless it could be shown that the subject had suffered, and that prosecutors
would have to prove harm rather than defendants having to justify themselves.

The NCCL's
submission stated: “Although this harm may be of a somewhat speculative nature,
where participation falls short of physical assault, it is none-the-less
justifiable to restrain activities by photographer which involve placing
children under the age of 14 (or, arguably, 16) in sexual situations.

“We suggest that the
term 'indecent’ be qualified as follows: – A photograph or film shall not for
this purpose be considered indecent (a) by reason only that the model is in a
state of undress (A: These are the Pedos demanding all this, up
there with all the politicians, who are Pedos, obviously, themselves.
Obviously!) (whether complete or partial); (b) unless it is proved or is to
be inferred from the photograph or film that the making of the photograph or
film might reasonably be expected to have caused the model physical harm or
pronounced psychological or emotional disorder.”

It added: “Our
amendment places the onus of proof on the prosecution to show that the child
was actually harmed.” (A: So in other words, it’s all the victims’
fault, you see. Just put all the onus on them.)

Miss Harman left
NCCL in 1982 when she was elected MP for Camberwell and Peckham (A:
...interesting name.), by which time several members of PIE had been
jailed for conspiracy to corrupt public morals.

A spokesman for Miss
Harman said: “This allegation is an outrageous slur. Harriet has fought for
child protection from sexual abuse over the last 30 years – any attempt to
suggest otherwise is untrue and malicious.
(A: ...it says.)

“It is completely
untrue that she supported the lowering of the age of consent to 14 – she
supported equalising the age of homosexual consent to make it the same as the
age of heterosexual consent which is 16.”
(A: Actually in Canada, it is… In Canada I think it’s 16, heterosexual,
but they actually got it lowered for anal sex, to down to 14, for folk who
don’t know that. See, it’s the same agenda in Canada and elsewhere, as I say.
This is a world organization, you understand. It’s a world agenda.)

And as I said before too, you will see live sex on the jaded screen.
You know, you’re coming down to bread and circuses, down to the end as your
countries are plundered by foreign corporations colluding with your politicians
and businessmen. And…

Nicole
Kidman quits real sex film

thesun.co.uk / IAN GARLAND / 19th October 2012

NICOLE Kidman has
reportedly quit new movie Nymphomaniac after finding out she had to have real
sex on screen.

But sources says she
threw in the towel after discovering Von Trier - who directed her in 2003's
Dogville - planned to make his actors romp for real. (A: ...that’s real sex.)

Nymphomaniac follows
sex addict Joe (Gainsbourg) as she recounts her erotic experiences to a man who
has saved her from a vicious beating. (A:
I guess if she did that she’d obviously be a sadomasochist, if she just
got beaten up and she starts telling this other guy about her sex life.)

It may have scared
Kidman off, but the prospect of having real sex on the big screen excites and
"terrifies" Shia LaBeouf.

The Transformers
star was reportedly so desperate to be cast, he sent Von Trier home made sex
tapes to prove he was up to the part. (A:
What a disgusting lot, folks. And you really don’t know what’s running
you in your culture, as you lap it up, and what effects it’s having on you and
all those around you. Because it’s not just dehumanizing, it’s lowering your
whole quality and value, VALUE of life. That’s the key to it, value of life.)

Another article I’ll put up too is Name
& Shame Social Workers site. It’s not a bad site actually, it seems. It’s mainly about
Britain, but I think they’re trying to expand into other countries. Because
it’s about people who are under the gun by Social Work departments that grab
children, etc., etc. At least they’re getting organized and fighting back.
Because it’s a huge business now in grabbing children for the authorities. And
again, they’re involved in a lot of the Pedo stuff themselves, for those who
haven’t been following it over the years. So it’s time they fought back to
what’s happening and hopefully they’ll get something done.

Another one too, it’s interesting. I never read the article but I noted
something about a week or two ago about some futurist magazine talking about
the coming phones, and eventually it gets into your brain, the chip in the brain,
like the one they put in DARPA’s paraplegic some years ago, to make it all
exciting. Well good luck to you if you want that. Lots will go for it, and they
won’t live long. But anyway it says…

Mobile
phones can cause brain tumours, court rules.

(A:
So a court has done this, a High Court.)

A
landmark court case has ruled there is a link between using a mobile phone and
brain tumours, paving the way for a flood of legal actions.

telegraph.co.uk / Richard Alleyne / 19 Oct 2012

Innocente Marcolini,
60, an Italian businessman, fell ill after using a handset at work for up to
six hours every day for 12 years.

Now Italy's Supreme
Court in Rome has blamed his phone saying there is a "causal link"
between his illness and phone use, the Sun (A: ...of Britain.) has reported.

Mr Marcolini said:
"This is significant for very many people. I wanted this problem to become
public because many people still do not know the risks.

"I was on the
phone, usually the mobile, for at least five or six hours every day at work.

"I wanted it
recognised that there was a link between my illness and the use of mobile and
cordless phones.

"Parents need
to know their children are at risk of this illness." (A: ...which there is massive proof actually.
They keep doing studies, about 4 or 5 a year, showing the same thing.)

British scientists
have claimed there is insufficient evidence to prove any link to mobiles.

But the respected
oncologist and professor of environmental mutagenesis Angelo Gino Levis gave
evidence for Mr Marcolini — along with neurosurgeon Dr Giuseppe Grasso.

They said electromagnetic
radiation emitted by mobile and cordless phones can damage cells, making
tumours more likely. (A:
They interfere with your DNA; they can shatter some of it.)

"It'll open not
a road but a motorway to legal actions by victims. We're considering a class
action." (A: ...lawsuit. And that’s really what it takes,
you understand. Once they start hitting them in the pocket they have to start
looking at it. Otherwise your governments will be happy to go along with it and
have you killed off too. It helps to depopulate as well.)

Mr Marcolini's
tumour was discovered in the trigeminal nerve — close to where the phone
touched his head.

It is non-cancerous
but threatened to kill him as it spread to the carotid artery (A:
In other words, it’s nonmalignant.), the major vessel carrying blood
to his brain.

His face was left
paralysed and he takes daily morphine for pain.

Alasdair Philips of
Powerwatch, which campaigns for more research on mobile use, said: "This
is an interesting case and proves the need for more studies. (A: We can get more studies as we’re all getting
brain tumors.)

"People should
limit mobile and cordless use until we know more."

The World Health
Organisation urged limits on mobile use last year, calling them a Class B
carcinogen.

But a spokesman for
Britain's Health Protection Agency said: "The scientific consensus is that
mobile phones do not cause cancer."
(A: You see, the British Health Protection Agency is on the payroll
of the big corporate boys, and they get a lot of grants from them, given to
them as well. And so it goes on and
on…)

Media lawyer Mark
Stephens said the verdict could "open the floodgates" — even though
there is no direct obligation on British courts to follow the Italians' lead.

He said: "It is
possible people will begin legal action here, but I think the chances of
success are less. I think they'll join any class action in Italy." (A: So good luck to them.)

By the way, they should do the same with these
darned… They’re actually more powerful, even worse, the smart meters they’ve
stuck in everybody’s homes, without permission. Because that’s much, much more
powerful than even your cell phone, and you really get zapped with that. If
you’ve got a meter you’ll see it spiking like crazy all throughout your house, many times a day. And that’s deadly
stuff. Deadly.

Now, I’ve also, I put up a link to a video about
a week ago or so, where you saw the Spanish police with these big long batons
just pummeling into the people who are peacefully protesting. And acting like
vicious, vicious hoods. Of course, it’s the same across the world now. And it
really shows you them… There’s even people sitting in cafés and so on, and they
were just coming in and cracking them over the heads, all for the hell of it.
Because that’s what’s happens when, as I say, the big power structure, that you
think is democracy, takes the mask off. It’s always been the same, folks. It’s
sheer brute force that makes you obey anything. And even believe anything, for that matter.
It says…

Spain
Proposes Law Prohibiting Recording And Capturing Of Local Cops In Action

zerohedge.com / Tyler Durden / 10/18/2012

If a recently
proposed law by the director general of Spanish police, Ignacio Cosidó, is
actually enacted, it is likely that live (or replayed) webcasts, photos and any
electronic recordings such as those seen recently from the Madrid
anti-sovereignty riots may be a thing of the past. But not because they no
longer exist: simply because very soon it may be illegal to actually record
said events. El Pais reports that "authorities are studying the
possibility that the next update to the Public Security Law could include an
article prohibiting the recording, processing or circulation on the internet of
police officers performing their duties (A: ...that’s when they bash all your skulls
in.), if doing so would endanger them or the operation in which they were
engaged." These are the same riot cops who typically wear gas masks, and
full riot attire and shields precisely to preserve their identity. But facts
matter little when the liquidity tide is going out and all the Ponzi schemes
are exposed to have been swimming naked. For now, Spain will be happy to little
by little strip its citizens first of their rights to free expression, then all
other rights, as it slowly but surely sells the country into Troika
slavery.

And remember too, what’s happening there will
happen anywhere. And it will come everywhere. Every country is ready for this;
they’ve built up internal armies for 30-odd years preparing for this part. See,
you’re living a long-term business plan. If you ever understand that you’ll
understand the whole thing. Things only can make sense when you understand it
that way. And nothing is unforeseen. Every possible move, including the bank
crashes, when they would make the
bank crashes happen, what they would
get out of the bank crashes, meaning social-wise and politically-wise and big
changes for the world, it’s all part of it, as these big central banks, private
banks get more money given to them. And now every citizen is not just bailing
the banks out. Perpetually you’ll have
to give cash to the banks, these big private corps, that are running over,
they’re above governments, you understand. They’re to be the government, the future government. I hope you understand
this. You have to read your history and then it will make some sense to you.

Now, in Texas, it says here…

Strange
Domes to Line the Texas Coast

in
Preparation for Something to Come

theintelhub.com / Shepard Ambellas / October 15, 2012

(A: And it’s got nice little
photographs of these big domes.)

HOUSTON —
Disaster-proof domes that can sustain winds in excess of 250 mph will cost
taxpayers more than $50 a foot. (A:
It will be more than that by the time they’re finished.)

FEMA has now offered
to pick up the tab of at least $50 million dollars (A: That’s your tax money,
folks.), to install disaster shelters in and around Houston that, according
to the manufacturer, (ABC Domes based out of Sealy – Division of Golden Sands
General Contracting out of Miami) are “almost impenetrable”.

The company has been
building these type of shelters for decades.

The government has
also offered to cover 75% of the cost on structures over 20,00 square feet in
size. A facility of this size would cost around $1 million.

What is interesting
is how recent reports vary in nature. Some say that the domes are to protect
citizens from hurricanes while others say that FEMA equipment will be held in
the domes. (A: Actually, that’s also where
they put you INTO. They mentioned that
years ago. In times of, you know, riots
and stuff, they put you IN the big domes, and you can’t get out of them. So I’ll put this link up tonight too.)

And with all the massive spraying that’s going
on… And the spraying has changed, by the way. They’ve added some more potent
stuff to the spray; it spreads faster, for rain, much, much faster. It’s also
got a yellowish tinge when you see it getting sprayed in the sky, and then the
sky becomes very dark, dark rapidly, and then you smell the stuff coming down.
It really stinks; you get a metallic taste in your mouth. And folk are getting
asthma attacks all over the place because of it. Of course it’s not happening,
according to governments, you see; it’s all under national security and they can’t
say anything about it. And they’re killing all the bird life off, and the small
animals off, and of course us as well. And it’s the new normal. It’s been here
since 1998 across the world. And they’re giving us the weirdest weather.

UK
experiences 'weirdest' weather

bbc.co.uk / 18 October 2012 / Roger Harrabin

The UK has
experienced its "weirdest" weather on record in the past few months,
scientists say. (A: ...you know, experts.)

The driest spring
for over a century (A: ...because they can stop rain, you see.) gave
way to the wettest recorded April to June in a dramatic turnaround never
documented before.

The scientists said
there was no evidence that the weather changes were a result of Man-made
climate change. (A: No, they know. They’ve got
enough sense, they’re doing it themselves. Look at all the incredible amount of
photographs about the spraying coming from Britain and elsewhere.)

But experts (A:
...again...) from three bodies (A: ...oh, experts...) warned the UK must
plan for periodic swings of drought conditions and flooding.

You see, because you see they’re manipulating ALL
the weather now. I’ll also put up that PDF from the US Air Force, again, it’s
manipulating the weather and how they have total weather control, etc.
etc. I’ll put that one up, from the
horse’s mouth, at least from the American side of it.

Weather as a Force Multiplier:
Owning the Weather in 2025 - http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf

So it’s quite amazing as they’ve been doing it.
You don’t get rain now, when you watch them spraying and spraying, and then you
get these monsoons coming down. That’s part of it too. At other times they can…
And they’re using it for weather warfare. You understand, it’s no coincidence
that Rothschild bought over the Weather Channel, and at the same time vastly went in a few years before it,
into India and others, with his Synerga, the GM company that he owns, the
genetically modified company that he owns, and bought up all the farms in India
and elsewhere, and started betting on a futures market for food, where it’s
going to be drought and where it’s going to be flooded, etc. It’s no
coincidence, folk. These guys knew it was coming because they’re all involved
in it, including the spraying, because they own the mines that all this crap
comes out of that they’re spraying on you. Back with more after this.

Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The
Matrix. What a matrix it is too, isn’t
it? And just mentioning too about all the spraying that’s going on, and how
they’ve got your food up on the world’s futures market, and they bet on drought
and they bet on flooding. A great thing
for the guys in on the know, isn’t it?
Because they know where they’re going to flood and they know where
they’re going to give you drought. This is weather warfare. It’s been
well-established. As I say, I’ll put up some articles tonight, from governments
themselves, talking about weather warfare. And it’s on; it’s been on on you for
quite a long time. What a great way to control everyone through food, though,
isn’t it? And great profits as well for the guys who are managing it all.

Also tonight I’ll put up a little video, it’s
quite amazing…

A
Conversation with Bernie Marcus - youtube.com
/ Oct 3, 2012

...Marcus (or Marx, I guess that’s where they
took the name from), the guy who owns the Home Depot, the guy who helped put
under thousands of small businesses and lumberyards and so on. Because they
always monopolize, these guys, when they move in; they knock everybody out of
business. That’s what they do. They’ve been doing it for a long time, these
guys, like centuries and centuries; that’s the standard thing. Then of course
they take over and then jack all the prices up when there’s no competition. So
he’s bitching about the state of the economy – oh my goodness – and how bad Obama is. Not that the other guy is any better. But guys like Bernie have
been given the word – you see, they’re given the word from their own guys – to
go for the other guy; that’s how it works.

Bruce Springsteen, of course…

Bruce
Springsteen campaigns for Obama in Ohio - guardian.co.uk

...in a video I’ll put up tonight too. And he’s all the way there. I wonder if
he’ll sing “Born in the USA” for Obama, eh? Or is that kind of a no-no? I don’t
know. Anyway, I’ll put that up tonight
too. And this one here…

Victoria Grant - youtube.com / May 8, 2012

That’s a little girl that came out with a video
on Canada’s banking system, so that a 12-year-old can understand it; it’s given
by a 12-year-old. It’s very simple.

And also too, ha! This one here is from The Telegraph, that Members of Parliament –
every year this happens – they’re refusing to disclose their expenses now;
because now the Members of Parliament are getting all their public expenses
from the taxpayer, for their special houses when they have to attend Parliament
and all that. And they buy lots of
them, and then they’re renting them to each other. We are paying for all their
mortgages, as they’re supposed to be working for the government, for you. [Alan laughing.] What a joke. I’ll put that up too. It’s quite interesting.

Expenses scandal: MPs block details of new expenses

telegraph.co.uk / 17 Oct 2012

And also, Ms. Gillard in Australia, it goes
through her history...

Gillard gave
support for union group's registration

theage.com.au / October 13 2012 / Mark Baker

A TRADE union
association from which hundreds of thousands of dollars were stolen by a former
boyfriend of Prime Minister Julia Gillard was registered only after Ms Gillard
vouched for its legitimacy to West Australian authorities.

So she and her boyfriend seem to have diddled a
lot of cash out of the union actually, and that’s been known for a while. But
that’s why all these laws came out, to try to stop journalists talking about
politicians. There’s just too much muck to be raked up here, and they’ve done
their best to do it. They’ve actually pulled in one journalist actually for
being politically incorrect and he’s been ordered by the government to take
journalism training. He’s a radio talkshow host. Quite something isn’t it,
eh? [Alan chuckles.] VOTE, remember, VOTE, for democracy. [Alan laughing.] What a joke.

Also tonight I’ll put up, from the Daily Mail,
it’s a story about armed militarized police SWAT teams – I’m not kidding you –
that chased a cow. Armed, you know,
with machine guns and everything and all their gear on, chased a cow that went
AWOL during a market thing it was on; it jumped and started running through the
streets, a young heifer. And they
machine-gunned it down for God’s sake. This is the world you’re living in
today, and you think you’ll accept this? Gunning down a cow that was making a
break for freedom… You know. You
shouldn’t have armed SWAT teams
walking around in any kind of natural society, folks. And you’re all taking it
for granted. God help you. God help us all.

From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s
good night and may your God or your Gods GO
with you.