On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:52:40PM +0100, Neil Wilson wrote:
> You need to be very careful not to hit a valid use case here.
>
> RFC3069 provides for a mechanism whereby a supernet/subnet system is
> setup to allow better use of available IPv4 address space. This is
> becoming of increasing concern as IPv4 space exhausts.
>
> To implement this you turn on Proxy ARP on a host and inject /32
> routes advertised from other hosts into the routing table. The network
> on the current host has a wide subnet mask (for example 10.0.0.0/8),
> so that the host responds to ARPs for VM guests that are actually on a
> completely different host.
The current network code only supports NAT, or a separate
routed subnet & thus currently require a non-clashing subnet.
Proxy ARP is a future RFE, so not a problem wrt this patchset
currently.
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|