USDA set out to change these inhumane practices and ultimately finalized the organic animal welfare rule during the last few days of the Obama administration. The language of the rule was a result of nearly two-decades of work among several stakeholders and requires that animals raised organic have:

“Unencumbered” access to the outdoors

More space to lie down, stand up, and fully stretch limbs

Greater limits for painful physical alterations

Improved access to pasture, sunlight and fresh air

Minimum standards for transport and slaughter

While the rule was set to become effective in March this year, USDA has pushed back the implementation of the rule three times under the new presidential administration. Earlier this month, the USDA published a notice in the Federal Register claiming that the benefits of the rule may be outweighed by the costs.

This comes after a move by the USDA to remove from its website all inspection reports and other related information regarding the treatment of animals at thousands of facilities across the country – making it harder for animal welfare advocates to show evidence of inhumane treatment.

Fortunately, the Organic Trade Association has filed a lawsuit under the Administrative Procedure Act against the USDA for this undue delay.

When the organic animal welfare rule was originally under consideration, Fair Farms joined the public in sending a message to the USDA that was loud and clear: 99.5 percent of the 47,000 comments submitted urged the agency to implement the rule and afford protections for all animals raised organic.

The USDA rule is a step in the right direction in meeting consumer expectations and providing better economic protections for the organic farmers who already are raising their animals under high welfare standards. Now, it’s up to the USDA to improve the lives of these animals, increase labeling transparency, and level the playing field for organic farmers who already implement these types of humane practices.