Author
Topic: an alternative version of the immaculate conception... (Read 154 times)

Three dirty old predators took advantage of a gullible village girl and when they got caught they told the superstitious irate father that god did it.

father was appeased and told the neighbors who told.....

Logged

some skepisms, 1. "I have not seen God. I have felt the invisible presence"2. What if there is a rock in the middle of a road, a blind person is speeding towards it, ...they say that they can't see it. Would you recommend him to keep speeding?

Here is the alternative, on her wedding night her "husband" used his property ( Mary ) as he saw fit and impregnated her,or the more reasonable story they borrowed it from previous religions that had a similar story.

Logged

There's no right there's no wrong,there's just popular opinion (Brad Pitt as Jeffery Goines in 12 monkeys)

She could have been a slave hubby raped and forced her into marriage, god said that its ok to do that.

Logged

some skepisms, 1. "I have not seen God. I have felt the invisible presence"2. What if there is a rock in the middle of a road, a blind person is speeding towards it, ...they say that they can't see it. Would you recommend him to keep speeding?

please no need to explain human copulation i mean how did.... oh never mind. could be kids watching.

Logged

some skepisms, 1. "I have not seen God. I have felt the invisible presence"2. What if there is a rock in the middle of a road, a blind person is speeding towards it, ...they say that they can't see it. Would you recommend him to keep speeding?

There are some interesting things in this article, if you want to pick through it.

It seems strange that Matthew could pick on Isaiah 7:14, to prove that Jesus had a virgin birth, if details about his real birth were known. Jesus isn't just a virgin, he comes out of nowhere, at age 30. If he had an infancy, his childhood would have also been divine, and notable. We would have had a 3 year old Jesus, preaching to the Rabbis, and being authoritative before any child could even read. Then, it would have been much harder for a Roman to crucify a 4 year old.

A problem arises: why did the writers make Jesus 32 when he was killed? Was it just because someone wrote the narrative of Pilate, and that was fixed, and then someone else wrote some narrative that fixed his time of birth according to prophecy?

There are some interesting things in this article, if you want to pick through it.

It seems strange that Matthew could pick on Isaiah 7:14, to prove that Jesus had a virgin birth, if details about his real birth were known. Jesus isn't just a virgin, he comes out of nowhere, at age 30. If he had an infancy, his childhood would have also been divine, and notable. We would have had a 3 year old Jesus, preaching to the Rabbis, and being authoritative before any child could even read. Then, it would have been much harder for a Roman to crucify a 4 year old.

A problem arises: why did the writers make Jesus 32 when he was killed? Was it just because someone wrote the narrative of Pilate, and that was fixed, and then someone else wrote some narrative that fixed his time of birth according to prophecy?

the gospel of Thomas shows the early years of Jesus,omitted from the Nt,because it shows Jesus as a little petty prick. We simply can't have a Gospel that shows Jesus in a negative way

Logged

There's no right there's no wrong,there's just popular opinion (Brad Pitt as Jeffery Goines in 12 monkeys)