"Unlike you I actually have worked in mental health institutions, as a psychologist. I'm not still learning the job, as you and your university friends are." -Malleus

Dumb and dumber. Old fool!

Who is the more stupid? The one arguing with the idiot or the idiot? Are you claiming that I'm lying?

I'll take that up. This isn't even Wikipedia, although that hardly seems to effect the ridiculous confidence of nuts like you in churning up hideously irony-free shite like "Are you claiming that I'm lying?".

Based upon your consistent behavioural patterns, it is absolutely impossible to believe you are (or even "have been” - sigh upon WP sigh) a psychologist who has worked in mental institutions. Even applying that ridiculous 'professional machismo' quotient that WPosers like you hang their invisible hats on, and (before anyone mentions it) the old adage about 'crankiness' in the personality-related professions too.

What you are Malleus is a typical Wikipego who thinks that 'anything goes' for the 'cause' in the great bare knuckle fight that is Wikipedia. Your only qualification is that you are an persistently arrogant nob who can't accept you can ever be wrong about anything. What else do you need? All that matters to maladjusts like you are how many numbers are in your clan, and their particular powers and support they have behind them. All the computer tactical game analogies are spot on.

I'm not sure you are even British, but I am sure that you and Rod would make a lovely couple. You share so much in common.

"Unlike you I actually have worked in mental health institutions, as a psychologist. I'm not still learning the job, as you and your university friends are." -Malleus

Dumb and dumber. Old fool!

Who is the more stupid? The one arguing with the idiot or the idiot? Are you claiming that I'm lying?

I'll take that up. This isn't even Wikipedia, although that hardly seems to effect the ridiculous confidence of nuts like you in churning up hideously irony-free shite like "Are you claiming that I'm lying?".

Based upon your consistent behavioural patterns, it is absolutely impossible to believe you are (or even "have been” - sigh upon WP sigh) a psychologist who has worked in mental institutions. Even applying that ridiculous 'professional machismo' quotient that WPosers like you hang their invisible hats on, and (before anyone mentions it) the old adage about 'crankiness' in the personality-related professions too.

What you are Malleus is a typical Wikipego who thinks that 'anything goes' for the 'cause' in the great bare knuckle fight that is Wikipedia. Your only qualification is that you are an persistently arrogant nob who can't accept you can ever be wrong about anything. What else do you need? All that matters to maladjusts like you are how many numbers are in your clan, and their particular powers and support they have behind them. All the computer tactical game analogies are spot on.

I'm not sure you are even British, but I am sure that you and Rod would make a lovely couple. You share so much in common.

You're quite right, of course, how perceptive of you. I'm actually an Albanian builder currently working in Poland.

"Based upon your consistent behavioural patterns, it is absolutely impossible to believe you are (or even "have been” - sigh upon WP sigh) a psychologist who has worked in mental institutions. Even applying that ridiculous 'professional machismo' quotient that WPosers like you hang their invisible hats on, and (before anyone mentions it) the old adage about 'crankiness' in the personality-related professions too."

"What you are Malleus is a typical Wikipego who thinks that 'anything goes' for the 'cause' in the great bare knuckle fight that is Wikipedia. Your only qualification is that you are an persistently arrogant nob who can't accept you can ever be wrong about anything. What else do you need? All that matters to maladjusts like you are how many numbers are in your clan, and their particular , and their particular powers and support they have behind them. All the computer tactical game analogies are spot on."

EXXACTLY

This is a guy who spends 13 hours a day on wikipedia and posts rampantly here also. Can't possibly have a real job.

"Based upon your consistent behavioural patterns, it is absolutely impossible to believe you are (or even "have been” - sigh upon WP sigh) a psychologist who has worked in mental institutions. Even applying that ridiculous 'professional machismo' quotient that WPosers like you hang their invisible hats on, and (before anyone mentions it) the old adage about 'crankiness' in the personality-related professions too."

"What you are Malleus is a typical Wikipego who thinks that 'anything goes' for the 'cause' in the great bare knuckle fight that is Wikipedia. Your only qualification is that you are an persistently arrogant nob who can't accept you can ever be wrong about anything. What else do you need? All that matters to maladjusts like you are how many numbers are in your clan, and their particular , and their particular powers and support they have behind them. All the computer tactical game analogies are spot on."

EXXACTLY

This is a guy who spends 13 hours a day on wikipedia and posts rampantly here also. Can't possibly have a real job.

An average of 1.6 posts per day over more than three years is a strange definition of "rampant".

"Too many admins" is in fact also under appreciated. It may not be true, but that's an empirical question. Logically, it's perfectly valid.

I suppose a better point would be "too many poor admins". I don't think there is an overabundance of good ones, and I hope that few people would object if there were. Wouldn't it be nice if the closing bureaucrat could say "Yes, I think this is a good admin candidate and to make room for him I've arranged a desysop of a rubbish admin".

Sxeptomaniac: >>I never planned on even trying for adminship, but participating in RFAs for a while only made it clearer why that was a good choice. It's not really even the process, IMO. It's the mind-numbingly bureaucratic participants, the popularity-contest nature of the thing, and the blatantly myopic denials of the obvious: "It's not a vote" and "Adminship is no big deal" were frequently cited whenever it became too apparent that everyone believes the opposite.

You've got that right, mate. I'm a big believer in the Wikipedia project and a proud content-creator, but the Lord of the Flies Adminship process is unbelievably fucking junior high school. I've got no use for that crap.

I made a point which you failed to respond to, and instead you chose to yet again resort to name-calling rather than discuss something in a mature manner.

Fuck off with your maturity bollocks asshole.

Thank you for proving my point. You are incapable of mature discussion and need to resort to childish insults so you can claim you "won". All that you've won is the title of Biggest Loser. Congratulations.