Die Armanenschaft der Ario-Germanen.
The purpose of this blog is to act as a storehouse of Armanist wisdom and to make this accessible to the English-speaking world. In so doing it is hoped that the light of Armanist truth may shine in an ever darkening world.
The blog is dedicated to the great master, Guido von List and is a companion blog to the Aryan Myth and Metahistory and Celto-Germanic Culture, Myth and History blogs.

The rights of the father started with the birth of the child, whether the newborn should be allowed to remain alive or not, was decided by the father. If it should remain alive he commanded the child to be lifted up in order that it be placed on the ground before his feet. The woman who placed it before his feet and then lifted it up was called because of that a "midwife"[earthmother; lifting mother] and was in prehistory a healer] thus a doctor and so to say a representative of the mother of the gods Frouwa, therefore she was an Armanen. From that in French we get "sages femme"[wise woman] which today is still her titel. If the father did not allow the child to be lifted up, then it was outcast. The outcast was not allowed nourishment, because a drop of milk or honey], or the first bath secured his life. Still in Christian times only unbaptised children were allowed to be outcast, that`s why one laid salt next to the outcast, which means that he had not yet have received baptism. Later children who were chosen to be outcast were placed before the churchdoor; whoever received them, received power over them, which the parents hads forfeited through their being outcast.It was mainly only the illformed, crippled children, who were not worthy of life, or those which which were not born legitimate and thus which the father did not want to recognise as his legitimate child that were made outcast. In the last case whoever brought the serious accusation that the mother had been unfaithful, the mother could demand from him a trial by ordeal. The child was placed in the father`s shield and put into the water. If the shield swam like a boat, so the child was regarded as legitimate; if the shield sank, so the child was regarded as illigitimate. This test by water survived for a long time and is known to cruelly have played a role in the witch trials.Also staying afloat was regarded as a sign of elvish nature, therefore as evidence of witchcraft, sinking as evidence of human nature. That the determination of evidence of guilt and innocence should be expressed this way, is only apparent, because the test is valid here for the recognition of the legitimate child, there for the elvish nature, in both cases staying afloat indicated a yes, no for sinking.

I have always been a seeker of spiritual truth from the age of 14 onwards.After an initial interest in spiritualism I gravitated towards various forms of xtianity before I started to hear the `call of the blood` in the early 90s and after a period of post-xtian nihilism I developed an interest in Wotanism and then subsequently Armanism which is its inner esoteric application.

"Racist"? In what sense exactly? And in what do you define the term?The fact that there are obvious links between theosopy and armanism or ariosophy is not to be marvalled at as theosophy is largely concerned with the wisdom of the ancient Aryans.