So Trump crying fraud and asking for a recount is fine but Jill Stein doing the same thing is not okay?

That there is Trump supporter logic.

Donald Trump has NOT YET filed for a recount in any state. But he's thinking about asking his attorney's to do so. He is focusing on getting his
cabinet built before January 20th.

Personally, I'd love to see a thoroughly detailed analysis/investigation into enough BLUE and RED states, in order to determine if FRAUD was
widespread, and which party had the most of it.

If what we see in large cities is any indication, Democrat Fraud will far outstrip Republican fraud in the examined states. At that point a committee
of Repubs/Dems can be appointed and assigned to methodically examine the accuracy and legitimacy of the votes in all 50 states. Measures can be
implemented to ensure that 2020 is the "cleanest" election in the last 75 years or so.

originally posted by: Swills
So Trump crying fraud and asking for a recount is fine but Jill Stein doing the same thing is not okay?

That there is Trump supporter logic.

So Jill/Hill crying for a recount is fine but Trump doing the same thing is not okay?

That there is the Left's twisted logic.

"I can be a whiny little baby but when you try imitate me just to prove a point I'll tell you how sad it is"
Too easy mate.

originally posted by: Byrd
Actually, we don't know that he has billions of dollars. Remember, he said he would release his tax forms - and then didn't. For all we know, the
money he's gotten from the campaign is helping him out of bankruptcy.

Would it really help if you convince yourself he's not a billionaire?

At this point you guys are best described as sore losers. The funny thing is that you're actually trying to paint reality as if Trump is the crybaby
and you are all strong beacons of example of fine temperament.

I honestly think Donald should just take a step back from this one. They recount won't matter in the end. He will still be President. You have to let
your political enemies squirm before they fall. (or it isn't humane)

In all seriousness I have to agree. I think the complete silence was working well, I was almost convinced he wasn't even paying attention until
today. I love the guy but someone needs to take away his twitter account.

yeah no kidding. Sometimes you just have to know when to stay quiet and not say anything. I mean I voted for him and I still believe he will push a
lot of the same agendas I believe in. It's just the fact that he doesn't know when to zip it. But to each there own. I won't pay attention to when he
does this. nor will I pay any heed to the other side. I'm at deaf ears. Guess it's good I can still read. ;D

The most interesting thing about California is that the northern part of the state is mostly Republican but as you can see the southern part and where
most of the illegals are concentrated are Democrat.

That alone tells a big story.

The northern rural part maybe. The populous bay area is decidedly democrat. You can pretty much guarantee that populated and educated areas will
always vote dem.

The most interesting thing about California is that the northern part of the state is mostly Republican but as you can see the southern part and where
most of the illegals are concentrated are Democrat.

That alone tells a big story.

The northern rural part maybe. The populous bay area is decidedly democrat. You can pretty much guarantee that populated and educated areas will
always vote dem.

Populated does not equal educated.
That is a very elitist comment to make.

If anything unemployment is higher in populated areas, so more people are living off the government.

originally posted by: ANNED
I know there is voter fraud issues in LA and San Fransisco.
That is how the democrats keep control of the state.
3/4 of the state votes republician and only small area votes democrat
Plus they have primary voting laws that freeze out republicians from state and federal offices.

This last election we had two democrats running for Senate because the Republican candidates were froze out in the primary's.
and the primaries are open ballot where anyone can vote for any party.

originally posted by: buster2010
This idiot just doesn't know when to keep his trap shut does he? Let's see his evidence or is he just going to run his trap like usual.

His presidency will be everything BUT boring!

Yeah nightmares can be a blast.

Did you call out Jill Stein and Hillary before you called out Trump?
Is your problem that Trump is 3rd to the recount party or is it just that because Trumps a straight white man so needs to check his priviledge and
give the ladies a chance?

As far as I know other than the result being close there is no need for a recount anywhere Trump won, they even claaimed one of the states Trump won
had been electronically hacked when they exclusively use paper ballots!!!

So do Jill and Hill need to shut their traps as well or is it OK for them to make accusations without evidence cause, you know, theyre not
Trump?

I think that Trump had other things to concentrate on first, such as his cabinet, but he did say that election reform was one of his goals after
election.
It had not been a priority, since he won, but I have no doubts he would have eventually addressed it.

But since Clinton is now forcing the issue, I think that he has every right to speak out now against the Democrat voter fraud.

Who was the idiot who said:
Not Accepting Election Results Was "Direct Threat To Democracy"
and
Not Accepting Election Results Was "Horrifying"
and
that someone who would not commit to honoring the results of November’s election is “undermining the pillar of our democracy.”

The same one who is now not accepting the results and joining in on recount efforts.

When a recount is started people on the ballet are allowed to have observers. So when a recount is started Clinton staff would be there even if they
did not ask for the recount, Trump, Johnson, and any other person on the presidential ballet could have observers as well.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.