Glad to have him back, sucks to only have 4 WR though. I was more comfortable having franks at PR. I find it funny that ajc said he was signed because of his PR ability, which frankly he didnt show more than franks.[/code]_________________

I think 4 WR's is enough. They do have Jackson and Davis on the PS, so I feel comfortable with where we are at.

I am insanely concerned that we only have 4 wide receivers on the roster. Especially considering the only TE I would want standing out wide is Tony G. What happens if one or even two of those five guys go out in a game? I think we need to activate one of our PS receivers._________________

I think 4 WR's is enough. They do have Jackson and Davis on the PS, so I feel comfortable with where we are at.

I am insanely concerned that we only have 4 wide receivers on the roster. Especially considering the only TE I would want standing out wide is Tony G. What happens if one or even two of those five guys go out in a game? I think we need to activate one of our PS receivers.

I don't think having 4 really is as big a concern as people think. How often does an offense run a 5 receiver set. The easy thing to do would be to run with Tony, Rodgers, White, Jones, Douglas. If you activated a guy like Davis or Jackson, chances are they play solely ST. However to activate one you have to remove another._________________XBL GT: L JGOLD L Adopt a Falcon | LB | Paul Worrilow

We likely have a WR in mind we want to sign to be our #5 but we cannot sign one until after Tuesday otherwise we have to gaurantee his salary for the entire season.

or the new offense uses Rodgers and Smith as RB/WR hybrids so we don't need a WR at this point. (crazy I know)

I was thinking that too, but I still don't think it solves the problem if a guy gets injured. It may work for the regular season, but I would really prefer us going into the playoffs with 5 WRs we can rely on._________________