Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on January
5, 2011. Newcomers look into my web site cuttingthroughthematrix.com
and help yourself to the many downloads, hundreds of them, of audios that you can
go over at your leisure, where I try to give you shortcuts to
understanding this big picture which they call reality at the top. That’s
the reality that’s made for you. It is different from the one that
they live themselves of course. I try and give you the organizations that
work together and the foundations and so on, all with a common cause, common
purpose, a common agenda to bring the world into a proper world, the way
it should properly be made and even making us the way that we should properly get
made in the future as well. We’re all just wrong, you see, and everything
is just wrong, and these are the big builders. They say that they came to
fix all those things that were made wrong and perfect them. That
means literally playing with the big dollhouse they call planet earth and
making the kind of world that they want. Of course they have many models
for different eras to come up after this one. So help yourself from those
audios. There are transcripts available too from all the sites in English
of a lot of the talks for print up. If you go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu
you’ll find transcripts in other languages too; print them up and pass them
around to your friends.

Remember
too, that you are the audience that brings me to you. I don’t bring on
the advertisers and I don’t sell things. The only things I sell are the
books I’ve written and the disks and so on that I have made. That keeps
me just ticking over. Now, I don’t know if I’ll go too far this
year because I need the cash just to get by; it’s expensive doing what I’m
doing. And it’s more then a full-time job; I wouldn’t wish this on
anybody. It’s just something that had to be done at the right time
because I accumulated enough knowledge throughout my own life and I said, I’ve got to tell the people what’s happening.
I came out eventually and started to do so and it’s a miracle, really, the way
that things took off. People were starved for real information and I
helped to give them the big picture. So purchase the books and so on that
I have up there. [Order and donation options listed above.]

We
are really going through the greatest changes ever and planned a long time ago,
written about too in published books a long time ago by the top socialists and
the Fabians and so on, where they said they’d bring in a controlled
authoritarian society. This whole idea of democracy just wouldn’t work,
too many conflicting parties. When you gave people rights and they
believed it individually they were a problem for their masters to handle. They
just couldn’t get you all to go along on the same course and direction at the
same time, so they’d have to be authoritarian. The idea was to initially
destroy all the culture that you had until you are hedonistic and narcissistic
and you’d think the world revolves around you. When you are like that you
won’t stand up for anybody else or even for yourselves together, and that’s
what’s happened today. That’s where we are today. This is the
greatest takedown ever. They have never taken a place or a nation or even
countries down like this before, where they have turned them all into hedonists
and narcissists and “look at me”, and it’s a free-for-all out there in the
sexual shopping mall. And they never grow up, but they don’t realize that
they have no future left. They don’t know that yet. I'll be back
with more after this break.

Hi
folks. We’re back and Cutting Through The Matrix, going into the reality
behind all of this and how the big boys themselves published their books and
boasted about what they’d planned to do. They were quite confident in
what they planned to do because it was discussed a long, long, long time ago
and humankind has been studied like no other creature on the planet, for
thousands of years. So they knew darn well that through behaviorism and
the sciences they could certainly change society and also too, by really taking
over what was supposed to be democracy – that never existed – but really taking
over in a big way, becoming more authoritarian.

They
could change school systems and get every country on the same curriculum, with
the same agenda, which they did do and that’s why they created UNESCO for the
United Nations and put Julian Huxley in charge. He also wrote a good book
about the kind of society they’d bring in. He said, we must separate one generation from the
others, the previous generations, and train them in a completely different
manner and get rid of the idea of sin… sin, all sins. In other
words, all the morality that held society together was to be demolished and
they would be taught to do whatever they wanted for a while. It would
cause a form of chaos and then of course government would come in and give you
the big laws to follow. Government would be the new law, you see, of the
land. They were not there to serve you; they were there to order you.
They certainly did that through the ’60s and sped up through the ’70s up to the
present time. Society as it was, has been turned on its head, completely,
and government has literally, as Julian Huxley said they wanted to, has taken over all the positions of the family.
They will support single mums and so on; they will give you the abortions you
want. Don’t worry, the government
will take care of everything; if you can’t manage to raise the child, we will
raise it for you and so on and so on. That’s what they planned to
do and they have been awfully successful.

They
brought the people to a stage where nobody can bond anymore. As I say,
the idea is to get out on the weekend, and dressed up to kill, and just end up
with whomever you happen to get handy for the night. It’s
ridiculous. They created a youth culture that’s supposed to be perpetual,
you don’t grow up ever – which is ridiculous in itself when you see a lot of
these women with their facelifts and stretched faces, and they can’t close
their eyes, and spending all their money, or someone else’s money, on trying to
keep fit, and keep their legs in shape and so on. Incredible amounts of
money trying to pretend that they are still young, instead of saying, no, I’m getting older, and wiser
hopefully, and unfortunately they are not getting wiser; they’re stuck in a
youth culture. At one time those who were elderly were held in high esteem.
In all cultures that are so-called primitive even today, they hold the elders
in high esteem because they’ve got the most wisdom. They’ve seen it all
and they’ve seen all the mistakes and pitfalls that the youngsters go
through. You asked them for advice and they’d give you great
advice. That doesn’t happen anymore. The ones who are ending up in
the old folks homes today are the TV generation; they grew up on it. They
thrived on it. They followed the directives of it. They copied it. They
mimicked it into their own real life, their own life, and they have nothing to
pass on to the youth of today at all. That’s exactly what the WAR was designed
to do.

So
here we are, at the mercy of the powers that be and it’s difficult to even get
people to come together for their own survival. That’s what you do when
you destroy all culture because it’s the fabric of the family and society that
holds you all together. That’s what warfare is. It’s all been very
successful across the Western world. We are going through the fallout now
where we are all pretty well helpless, and all yelling and screaming but we
have no solutions to it. And nobody wants to give up what they think is
the good life because they have been raised in it. They have been raised with
multi partners and so on and having a great old time. They don’t want to
lose that, and yet you can’t have it all. You can’t have it all.
You see, if you have no self-discipline then there will be no discipline in
those around you to stand together. The old sins, as they called them,
were really there to give you self-discipline… a time and a place for
everything.

As
I say, it’s been very successful and there is no doubt about it, there were a
group of men at the top. There was a group of men with many foundations,
many organizations, at the very beginning of the 20th century.
They existed already of course in previous centuries; they went under different
names. As I’ve mentioned before, the Milner Group, one of the biggest
groups that came forward to push forward the British Empire that would mutate
into a world empire when America would take over for them. They
created the Council on Foreign Relations. They created, when they joined
with the Rhodes Foundation, the Rhodes Scholarship for World Leaders – not for
national leaders but a lot of them became national leaders by the way – and
they literally brought in the kind of world they wanted to bring in. They used
education to completely alter the culture, in a single generation, raised them
up, gave them their fun for a while and now they are bringing them all
down. Because at the same time they planned to bring down the West, once
they were all dysfunctional.

They
planned to take it down financially. When they signed the free trade
agreement with China, through the World Trade Organization, they knew darn well
that once that happened all balance of trade would be anything but a balance;
it would all be a one-way street from China to North America and Europe. That’s
exactly what has happened. This whole farce of balance of trade is
nothing more than that; it’s a farce. The only thing that goes back to
China are issues of credit and debt. That’s what goes back to China,
IOUs. They knew this and they replaced it with nothing. They knew
when they brought in this free trade they were going to replace it with nothing
and they called it, really, a service economy that they’d bring in – which
they’d already tried in Britain and it failed miserably. When you’re a
service economy you just buy things and you pass them around. The
countries that manufactured the original item are the ones who bring in the
cash. Without manufacture you’ve had it, and they knew this too.

At
the same time all this was going on they were bringing in the greening movement.
They were going to use, for depopulation purposes – and this is the real goal
behind the greening movement and sustainability and all the rest of it, all the
various crisis of global warming. Before, it was an ice age; then the
same characters turned out to global warming for a while. Their whole
goal was to use sustainability and weather predictions and manmade weather
disasters, supposedly, to convince us that we had to be sterilized and bring
the population down, even though their own official charts, and the UN charts,
show that the populations of the Western world have been plummeting because no
one is having children. That’s the reason your own governments come out
openly and say, that’s why we have to
have massive immigration, to pay off the national debt. That’s
what they tell you. So even when you have been goody-two-shoes and had no
children, you’ve had your hedonistic lifestyle, and lifetime, then it doesn’t
please them because you can’t please these monsters at the top. They have
a different agenda, a different reason for lying to you, you see.

I’m
going to read some of the liars here that came out in the past, that were well
funded by the big foundations and are still held up by some of the ecologists
today as the pioneers for giving out the bad news to the public.
I’ll put these sites up, everything I mention, on my web sites at the end of
the show. This is called…

Busted predictions from brazen prophets

joannenova.com.au / Posted By Joanne Nova / January 3,
2011

What is most
astounding about the human race is that people like Ehrlich, (Alan:
That’s the great pal of course, of Holdren that’s now appointed to be the
Science Czar for the United States.) who predicted vast coastlines would be
evacuated due to rotting fish by 1980, or Oppenheimer with a black blizzard of
sand covering a continent (by 1995), people who have long proven to be arrant
failures at making predictions are still invited to speak or write. Some
commentators still mention their name or quote them with a straight face.
(A: These are psychopaths, you see; psychopaths never have any shame.)

Surely it takes a
special kind of braggadocio and a certain delusion- of-grand-proportions for
these would-be leaders to appear in public after predictions like these?

And yet they do.

Adapted and
rearranged from Fox News: (A: This is a Paul Ehrlich speech.)

1 “By the year 2000
the United Kingdom will be simply a small group of impoverished islands,
inhabited by some 70 million hungry people … If I were a gambler, I would take
even money that England will not exist in the year 2000.”

Ehrlich, Speech at British Institute For Biology,
September 1971

2 “In ten years all
important animal life in the sea will be extinct. Large areas of coastline will
have to be evacuated because of the stench of dead fish.”

3 “[By] 1995, the
greenhouse effect would be desolating the heartlands of North America and
Eurasia with horrific drought, causing crop failures and food riots…[By 1996]
The Platte River of Nebraska would be dry, while a continent-wide black
blizzard of prairie topsoil will stop traffic on interstates, strip paint from
houses and shut down computers.”

Michael Oppenheimer, published in “Dead Heat,” St.
Martin’s Press, 1990

(A: These
are the heroes of this movement.)

4 “If present trends
continue, the world will be … eleven degrees colder by the year 2000. This is
about twice what it would take to put us in an ice age.”

Kenneth E.F. Watt, (A: No relation to
mine.) in “Earth Day,” 1970 (A:
At that time, you see, their guess was an ice age; they were going to bank on
that.)

5 “Arctic specialist
Bernt Balchen says a general warming trend over the North Pole is melting the
polar ice cap and may produce an ice-free Arctic Ocean by the year 2000.”

7 “By 1985, air
pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half.”

Life magazine, January 1970 (A:
I'll be back with more after this break.)

Hi
folks. I’m back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just cutting
through the reality here, from these gurus, these science gurus that were put
out in the 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s to give us all this bad news about
anthropogenic global warming, manmade global warming, which we had to
believe in, you see, in order for the carbon taxes to get pushed, to set up a
worldwide bureaucratic structure to tie all economies together under their
jurisdiction, much like the way that they got the EU together; the same kind of
thing. Here is another great prediction here. It says…

8 Within a few years
“children just aren’t going to know what snow is.” Snowfall will be “a very
rare and exciting event.” (A: There is a link to more detail of this
article here.) (I covered this prize example in detail on this
page.)

David Viner, East Anglia CRU, 2000 (A:
The famous East Anglia University Climate Research Unit, the guys that put all
the fake emails out, and they were getting millions in grants given to them to
put out more lies for this very important agenda, that we must all believe in,
you see, that WE are the problem.)

9 In June 2007, Tim
Flannery warned Brisbane that its “water supplies are so low they need
desalinated water urgently, possibly in as little as 18 months”. Last
month Brisbane recorded the wettest December in 150 years.

10 But of course,
who could forget the Australian BOM which predicted that “The national outlook
for total rainfall over spring (September to November), is neutral for most of
the country” which was promptly followed by record downfalls and widespread
floods with some areas getting 400% of the average rainfall. The only part of
the country the BOM predicted “a wetter than normal spring” was in South
West WA (which recorded one of its driest springs since measurements
began). (A: [Alan laughing.] so they are wrong in everything
here.)

The Australian Bureau of Meteorology, Aug 2010

This
is quite a good site. It’s got articles from the Club of Rome that came
up with the idea of global warming, the guys that said “that would fit the bill”… the bill, you know, to make us
all buckle under and they’d bring in an authoritarian system. There are
other little articles as well so I’ll put this up tonight for you to peruse and
have a good laugh at. Unfortunately, even though we laugh away, you see
it’s now THE LAW. It’s the LAW. These are the new priests, you see,
of SCIENCE and they are getting all the backing of the big boys who put them
there. They have a very important job to do to get all this rammed down
our brains, all this nonsense.

The
Met Office in Britain was also getting huge grants and so on for global
warming. It says here, from The Mail Online…

Met Office knew big freeze was coming but hushed it up

By Rachel Quigley / dailymail.co.uk / 4 January 2011

The Met Office warned
ministers (A: That’s politicians.) to expect an ‘exceptionally
cold winter’ but then kept the prediction secret from the public. (A:
See, we’re still supposed to believe it’s warming.)

The forecaster
decided not to reveal the information because it was embarrassed after wrongly
predicting a ‘barbecue summer’ in 2009, BBC analyst Roger Harrabin said.

Instead of a
seasonal forecast, it offered only monthly snapshots.

(A: Then it
shows you a picture of all the cars trying to wade through all the snow, right
now, in Britain. They got the Army out and everything; there was so much
snow they couldn’t handle it. All the different counties cut back in
getting prepared for it by not bothering to order in the sand and gravel for
the roads. Because after all, it was going to be a barbeque winter and
here they are under piles and piles of snow.)

It’s
quite something what’s going on, but again, you can’t keep a good liar down and
they all come up to the surface and get put on government positions and then
they tell us how to live, and what to eat, what not to eat, and to be austere,
etc. Now of course, as we know, at the last Cancun meeting, the whole
idea was to grab money from EVERY country and get these traitors, that you call
Prime Ministers and Presidents, to sign your cash away to their big businesses
in third world countries.

Now,
here is an article here that’s very unsettling. It’s one of many that
have come out with the genetic tampering. It’s GM pigs this time.
It’s in Canada and it says…

The BBC's Jeremy
Cooke has had rare access to some genetically modified Enviropigs in Canada.

In a small complex
of nondescript barns set in the flat, snow-covered fields of Ontario is a
scientific project which, some argue, represents the new frontier of a
technology that could benefit millions of people around the world.

For others what is
happening here is weird, dangerous science.

The pigs they are
breeding could be among the first genetically modified farm animal to be
approved for human consumption. (A: Actually, you can actually
take the fish in because they already modified the fish and they are farming
them.)

The huge controversy
over the introduction of genetically modified crops is well documented, but
this seems to take that debate a step further, and into even more troubled
waters.

The project here is
called Enviropig. The animals inside the clean, warm barns look like normal
pigs and behave like normal pigs, but they are living, breathing wonders of
modern science. (A: They’ll be little monsters. I’ve seen
the ones they did with calves and so on, and the one they did for pigs before,
and the skeletal system was so fragile, to get a camera shot they had to hold
this poor thing up it was so sick. It’s disgusting.)

Each one contains
genes from mice (A: And their favorite of course…) and E.coli
bacteria, which have been inserted into their DNA with absolute precision.

Those genes make a
small but important difference to the way these pigs process their food. (A:
It changes their whole system inside. Each time a cell dies off the new
DNA, which is fixed to the e-coli, reproduces themselves; it takes it place
until eventually the whole thing is really engineered.)

Ordinarily, pigs
cannot easily digest chemicals called phosphates. That means that the stuff
that comes out of the back end can be toxic and damaging to the environment.
The phosphates are easily washed into waterways, where they can produce a
hugely fertile environment for plants. But the plants grow so rapidly that they
choke the stream or river and cause huge damage to the ecosystem. (A:
So in other words it’s a great fertilizer, but, oh, it can choke the
ecosystem. I’ll go into more of this when I come back and tell you what
else they’ve done with these pigs. I'll be back with more after this
break.)

Hi
folks. We’re back Cutting Through The Matrix and we’re talking about the new
GM pigs. They’ve tried this before, GM pigs. I don’t know if people
realize that they had GM pigs in the US in the late 70s, and eventually ended
up in the food supply; that’s all mixed up together with the food supply with
the pigs in the US now. They have been at this for years. They
always try to say it’s something brand new but they have been at this for
years. To be honest with you too, when they write this kind of thing in
the newspaper, for every one that they tell you about, every lab they tell you
about, or experimental place – there are other places, all over the place we
will never, ever hear of, on islands and different places that are inaccessible
and it’s been like that for an awful long time. Everything that they try
has already been done on a much higher scale somewhere. These guys are
doing what’s called REsearch – they are searching again. It’s stuff
that’s already been done. This is the stuff that we at the bottom level
are supposed to believe, that they are just on the cutting edge right now, you
see.

Professor Rich
Moccia of the University of Guelph is proud of what has been achieved. (A:
Then he goes on to his little PR spiel of how it’s wonderful and it’s a great
discovery and all that kind of stuff.)

But it is controversial.
To those who have campaigned so long and hard against the introduction of
Genetically Modified (GM) crops, the notion of genetically engineered animals,
such as Enviropig (A: Even the name, Enviropig, right.) and
fast-growing GM salmon, is a new front in a long war.

In Toronto, the Big
Carrot supermarket is among the few GM-free outposts in North America. They
have been fighting for years to hold back the tidal wave of genetically
modified produce.

For anti-GM
campaigner Lucy Sharratt, the very notion of transgenic animals is a
nightmare.

It
should be a nightmare for us all actually. Remember, the pig is the
closest thing to a human, supposedly, genetically. Do you really think
this is all to do with pigs? Do you really? When I was small for
goodness sake, I asked the questions. They kept showing me these science
things on television about little rats running around in cages and stuff and
doing experiments on them and how they can train them to do this. I
thought, why, do they want to just train rats to be nice… when they invade
folks’ homes or something? I mean, this is all to do with human beings
for God sake. Do you understand? Every test that’s been out there,
it’s how to modify the behavior and now it’s the very structure, the genetic
structure of humans that they are really going towards, for those that haven’t
clued into it yet. Or they can get a chimp to communicate using so many
words; do you think it’s all about training a chimp? It’s all behavior
modification and how to alter all kinds of life, but especially human
life. The ones at the bottom are the biggest problems for those at the
top. Not so much as we used to be, we are really tamed now; very
tame. But we used to be quite wild at one time; we did things about it
when we felt threatened and so on. Here they go again with their GM,
GM-this and all the rest of it, etc. There is always fallout from
everything that they tamper with in nature, as we all know; I hope we do know
this.

There
is another one here, another article and it’s from The Atlantic. It’s
talking about where the US is supposed to be heading towards. I’m also
putting up tonight a link to George Soros giving an interview. He’s quite
casual about telling you where the new world order is going. He’s quite
happy with it. You’ll hear him saying ‘we’ an awful lot when he is
mentioning The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. He even
mentions at one point that a lot of the countries that got bailouts didn’t
really need them, but that money could go, he says… In other
words, the bailouts, the LOANS they are taking from the IMF will actually go to
certain United Nations promoted businesses in third world
countries. So we are borrowing to give it away; that’s your
redistribution of wealth, etc. He’s quite casual about it all.

George Soros openly discusses New World
Order, SDR's, Dollar Decline, World Currency

youtube.com / November 29, 2009

You
understand, the IMF and so on… he even mentions the G20. The G20 is the
sort of term that the Milner Group brought up, because they used to have
committees of all kinds. Some were called Committees of 50 and Councils
of 4 and stuff like that, so that no one else knew what they were talking
about, if you heard it in conversation. The G20 is exactly the same; what
is the G20? Hmm? And who elected them? Well, you know.
And whose constitution could they go off and make another club, an
international club, with your Prime Ministers and Presidents? Well, they
did it… to bring in a closed global society, under their control of course, or
their masters’ control because none of these guys are the bosses. I’ll
put that link up with Soros and you can see that for yourself. It’s quite
an interesting name, Soros; it’s related to a snake or a dragon. However,
he’s a man of Sorrows. I call him a man of Sorrows because he’s brought
sorrow to billions of people with his finagling of the stock market with his
other pals.

Back
to this article here, from the Atlantic. It says…

The Rise of the New Global Elite

By Chrystia Freeland / theatlantic.com /
January/February 2011

If you happened to
be watching NBC on the first Sunday morning in August last summer, you would
have seen something curious. There, on the set of Meet the Press, the host,
David Gregory, was interviewing a guest who made a forceful case that the U.S.
economy had become “very distorted.” In the wake of the recession, this guest
explained, high-income individuals, large banks, and major corporations had
experienced a “significant recovery”; the rest of the economy, by
contrast—including small businesses and “a very significant amount of the labor
force”—was stuck and still struggling. What we were seeing, he argued, was not
a single economy at all, but rather “fundamentally two separate types of
economy,” increasingly distinct and divergent. (A: He’s
absolutely right, this guy. You’ve got two types of economy now, one
that’s meant to be the winner and you can’t lose, and the rest that are meant
to go down hill and they can’t win.)

This diagnosis,
though alarming, was hardly unique: drawing attention to the divide between the
wealthy and everyone else has long been standard fare on the left. (The idea of
“two Americas” was a central theme of John Edwards’s 2004 and 2008 presidential
runs.) What made the argument striking in this instance was that it was being
offered by none other than the former five-term Federal Reserve Chairman Alan
Greenspan: iconic libertarian, preeminent defender of the free market, and (at
least until recently) the nation’s foremost devotee of Ayn Rand. When the high
priest of capitalism himself is declaring the growth in economic inequality a
national crisis, something has gone very, very wrong. (A: No
it’s not at all; it’s something that’s going very, very right. It was
planned to happen this way.)

This widening gap
between the rich and non-rich has been evident for years. In a 2005 report to
investors, for instance, three analysts at Citigroup advised that “the World is
dividing into two blocs—the Plutonomy and the rest”:

In a plutonomy there
is no such animal as “the U.S. consumer” or “the UK consumer”, or indeed the
“Russian consumer”. There are rich consumers, few in number, but
disproportionate in the gigantic slice of income and consumption they take.
There are the rest, the “non-rich”, the multitudinous many, but only accounting
for surprisingly small bites of the national pie.

And
that’s the way it’s supposed to be. There is no doubt about it, it was
planed that way, make most of the country defenseless and they will all be
asking for help. They don’t think of doing anything else except ask for
help. There is nothing more disgusting than seeing people in the streets
with placards saying to the government give
us jobs. That’s called socialism. You’ve been brought to what the
Fabians wanted, to socialism. Now you’re begging the masters. In The
Soviet Story, the great video that was put out of the TRUE Russia, the
Soviet regime, with its massive slaughtering and starvation of millions of
people, you will see one of the founders of the Fabian Society, George Bernard
Shaw, in a rare clip of him talking where he says, when we are in charge YOU – every one of you; he’s
talking about the lower classes – will
have to come to us and justify why we should keep you alive.
That’s socialism, that’s the REAL socialism folks. That’s the true face
of socialism. It’s an authoritarian system. It is the system you
are under now. Even though they are calling it globalism, it’s
transferred its name from soviet and socialism to now it’s just called
globalism. It’s an authoritarian society… you
do what we tell you or else.

I’m
also putting up a link to this site tonight and it’s from The Daily Bail
actually; it came from Bloomberg originally. It says…

The five largest
loan servicers, including Bank of America Corp. and JPMorgan Chase & Co.,
may be the first to settle with the 50 state attorneys general probing
foreclosure practices, (A: They are doing investigations into them.) Iowa
Attorney General Tom Miller said.

No settlements have
been reached yet, Miller said yesterday in a phone interview. The other three
are Citigroup Inc., Wells Fargo & Co. and Ally Financial Inc., said Miller,
the leader of the 50-state investigation. The five have 59 percent of the U.S.
market, Miller said.

“What we’re looking
at is five separate agreements with the five largest servicers,” Miller said.
“We’re still a ways away” from reaching agreements, he said. “We’re working
very hard to figure out what should be in the settlement.”

All 50 U.S. states
are investigating whether banks and loan servicers used false documents and
signatures to justify hundreds of thousands of foreclosures. (A: They
faked them folks.) The probe, announced Oct. 13, came after JPMorgan
and Ally Financial’s GMAC mortgage unit said they would stop repossessions in
23 states where courts supervise home seizures, and Bank of America, the
largest U.S. lender, froze foreclosures nationwide.

The group isn’t
pursuing a criminal investigation, Miller said. “Our focus is to reform the
servicing process and that’s inherently civil, not criminal,” he said. (A:
It’s amazing; there is never any criminal proceedings that come out of these
guys, faking signatures and all the rest of it… and sinking a country, eh?)

In an interview last
week, Miller said the group might consider matters including whether servicers
are charging borrowers appropriate fees. [Alan chuckles.]

“We hear stories far
too often of it taking months before servicers get back to people, or they lose
documents and that they don’t modify a loan when it makes sense,” Miller said
last week.

Then
there are great comments beneath it that go into the natural common sense
argument of, how come they can rob millions of people blind, they can fake
signatures and the whole bit and there are no charges? Well it’s because,
you see, they are the bosses. That’s why. They run your
governments. Your governments gave them pretty well all you had.
Your governments have given them all that your great grandchildren will ever
have, with all the loans that they’ve given to them, from your tax money.
And they borrowed that money from international bankers to do that.

Here
is another site; it’s very good on what’s happening to America. YEARS ago
I said to people, haven’t you noticed
that the cities and the roads and so on are falling apart? At one
time when you got a pothole they’d get the real tarmac, the hot tar with the
stones in it and the whole thing, and you’d see the hot machines there pouring
it in and really tapping it down and tapping it down until you could hardly
tell that it was a repair patch that was put on. Now they just pour this stuff
in that lasts about a week or two before it’s all washed out again. It’s
the same with everything else you look around. They said at Toronto a few
years back there, to fix the
infrastructure of the city, including all the sewer pipes and so on that
are burst and there are leaks everywhere, they’re
as well as building a new city. Well, these are the cities that
they are going to cram us into for the next 50 years, as we all die off.
That’s why they weren’t going to fix it. That’s why. These cities
are to be prison camps; they already are to an extent. This says…

Everything Is Falling Apart: 20 Facts That You Will
Not Want To Read If You Still Want To Feel Good About America’s Decaying
Infrastructure

theeconomiccollapseblog.com

If you haven't
noticed lately, America is literally falling apart all around us.
Decaying infrastructure is everywhere. Our roads and bridges are
crumbling and are full of holes. Our rail system is ancient. Our
airports and runways have definitely seen their better days. Aging sewer
systems all over the country are leaking raw sewage all over the place.
The power grid is straining to keep up with the ever-increasing thirst of the
American people for electricity. (A: Actually, they are closing
down coal generators and they aren’t replacing them, and they don’t intend to
replace them.) Dams are failing at an unprecedented rate.
Virtually all of our ports are handling far more traffic than they were ever
intended to handle. (A: Because it’s all coming from
China.) Meanwhile, our national spending on infrastructure is way
down. Back during the 1950s and 1960s we were spending between 3 and 4
percent of our national GDP on infrastructure, but today we are spending less
than 2.5 percent of our national GDP on it. (A: And look at your
taxes in the city too, ever increasing taxes, just going up and up and
up. For what? For what?) According to the American
Society of Civil Engineers, we need to spend approximately $2.2 trillion on
infrastructure repairs and upgrades just to bring our existing
infrastructure up to "good condition".

Well,
you will never get that happening. They don’t intent to do it. But
they do go into other things they’re doing too, of how some states are actually
tearing up the tarmac, and I’ve read some articles before on the air about
this, and replacing it with gravel because it’s far more cheaper. But
these are then temporary roads, you see; they don’t last terribly long.
Everything in the country is to be temporary, because under Agenda 21
and The Millennium Project we’re not supposed to be in possession of private
motor vehicles; we’re all to live in our little sustained communities, which
are just crowded, overcrowded cities. It’s to be “essential vehicles only.” Quite something, eh?

Decline
of the Empire talks about this too.

29% Of Americans Say It's Difficult To Afford Food

declineoftheempire.com / 01/03/2011

The Pew Research
Center for the People & the Press released their year-end survey on
December 15, 2010. Their polling revealed that for the public, a tough year
ended on a down note. (A: Well, no kidding; I guess that’s what
we need experts to tell us, eh?)

Consistent with the
mood of the nation all year, 2010 is closing on a down note. Fully 72% are
dissatisfied with national conditions, 89% rate national economic conditions as
only fair or poor, and majorities or pluralities think the country is losing
ground on nine of 12 major issues.

Pew's survey results
are not surprising, and I would cover them in depth if it weren't for some
rather important information that was buried in the next to last paragraph.

The survey finds
that a majority of the public (57%) says it is very difficult or difficult to
afford things they really want. About the same percentage said this two years
ago (55%). And for many Americans, affording basic necessities remains a
struggle – 51% say it is difficult to afford health care, 48% say the same
about their home heating and electric bills, and 29% say it is difficult to
afford food.

I just quoted Pew,
and you read the quote, but I want to make sure all of us truly absorbed what
it says. So let me repeat the information as a series of bullet points.

•
Affording basic necessities remains a struggle.

• 51%
say it is difficult to afford health care.

•
48% say the same about their home heating and electric bills.

•
29% say it is difficult to afford food.

Why isn't this
information Front Page News? Can you see the headline? I can see it, splashed
across the top of the front page of the New York Times—

29% of Americans Say
It's Difficult To Afford Food

And
so on and so on it goes. But that’s the way it’s supposed to go because I
already read that little bit about Greenspan who also points out the same thing.
You have two economies in the US now and in the UK and elsewhere: the
stinking rich and then all the rest. That’s the way it’s been planned to
go folks, the complete eradication of the middle class and even the lower
middle class. And a lot of people in America don’t realize that, they
class themselves as middle class but they are still working
people, in factories; they went by their income, not by the suit and tie
that they wore going off to the job like they do in Europe. They have
been pretty well wiped out. And they had to be wiped out because after
all, your big bosses a long time ago planned to give all industry to China...
ALL industry to China… and it’s been awfully successful. We’re just
living through the chaos now. I'll be back with more on the Decline of
the Empire after this break.

Hi
folks. We’re back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and just this
little article at the end here, it’s something that you think you would have
read coming out of the Soviet Union because it’s completely socialist
and it’s the same wording they use and so on. They use a kind of
bureaucratese in how they speak; they can’t say anything simply and
straightforwardly. They do a lot of hinting and so on. This comes
from a Seattle paper and it says…

Planning ahead is considered racist?

seattlepi.com / By ANDREW J. COULSON / June 1, 2006

Are you salting away
a little money for your retirement? Trying to plan for your kids' education? If
so, Seattle Public Schools seems to think you're a racist.

According to the
district's official Web site, "having a future time orientation"
(academese for having long-term goals) is among the "aspects of society
that overtly and covertly attribute value and normality to white people and
Whiteness, and devalue, stereotype and label people of color." (A:
This is exactly the stuff they put out in the Soviet Union.)

Huh?

Not all the
district's definitions of racism (and there are lots of them) are so cryptic.
The site goes on immediately to say, "Emphasizing individualism as
opposed to a more collective ideology" is another form of "cultural
racism." (A: They don’t like individuality at all;
it’s a big problem for the elite, in fact.)

Regardless of your
color, your affinity for planning or your penchant for reading "Das
Kapital" under Fremont's Lenin statue, does this make any sense to you?

See if this sounds
familiar: a government agency redefining a highly charged word to advance a
particular ideology. ... Um, note to the Seattle School Board and administration:
George Orwell's novel "1984" was a cautionary tale, not a how-to
book. And the folks trying to control people's thoughts through state
manipulation of the language -- they were the bad guys. (A:
Well, I did an article about a week ago; in Britain they actually have a board,
like a psy-ops board, working on top of the government to alter people’s
behavior with similar kind of stuff.)

But this is still a
free country. Thanks to our (ostensibly racist) regard for individual liberty,
Seattle Public Schools board members and officials are free to adopt whatever
definitions of racism they choose. It is inherently divisive, however, for an
official government school system to promote one ideology over another.

Unfortunately, it is
also unavoidable.

Whenever there is a
single official school system for which everyone is compelled to pay, it
results in endless battles over the content of that schooling. (A:
This is socialism again, too, to eliminate all types of school and bring in
standardized schooling across the world. That’s what UNESCO is about; they put
out the blueprints for all the schools to follow across the world.)
This pattern holds true across nations and across time. Think of our own
recurrent battles over school prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, the teaching of
human origins, the selection and banning of textbooks and library books, dress
codes, history standards, sex education, etc. Similar battles are fought over
wearing Islamic headscarves in French public schools and over the National
Curriculum in England.

Historically,
societies have suffered far less conflict when families have been able to get
the sort of education they deemed best for their own children without having to
foist their preferences on their neighbors.

And
that’s your problem with liberalism, or socialism. You see, they stand no
competition. They pretend they are so LIBERAL with everything but really
they are utterly, utterly intolerant of any other opinion… any other opinion
whatsoever and they want everything STANDARDIZED. Is that liberal to
you? Is that what you thought liberalism was? …everything is
standard. They tell you what you can say and what you can’t say!
They’ll actually tell you, oh you can’t
say that… and now they are telling you, you
can’t even think that. But this is socialism. As I say,
globalism is really just the new term for socialist collectivism… run by, you
know, the proper people, the scientific society, the academia, working
on behalf of the financial masters. That’s the reality of the world that
we are living in folks.

From
Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or
your Gods GO with you.