Spare a thought for Mike Duffy. The P.E.I. senator got dragged down this week by an undertow of controversy engulfing a second, far more problematic colleague.

First, let’s agree, the Senate is a barnacle on the government’s backside, a $92.2-million-a-year relic of Confederation that deserves to die.

Let’s also agree that Senator Patrick Brazeau further discredited the red chamber Thursday, getting arrested at his home in Gatineau, then booted by Stephen Harper from the Conservative caucus. Then Friday, Brazeau was charged with assault and sexual assault.

Now, let’s turn to the Charlottetown-born Duffy, a successful former broadcast journalist appointed to the Upper House five years ago by Harper.

The rotund parliamentarian is being splattered, unfairly, by all the tomatoes now being tossed at the Senate.

Duffy is being pilloried for claiming, since 2010, housing costs of $33,000 for his residence in Ottawa.

Duffy also owns a home in Cavendish, in accordance with Senate rules stating he must own at least $4,000 worth of property in the province he represents.

His expense claim is causing a fuss because the housing allowance is targeted to senators who have primary residences 100 kilometres or more outside Ottawa. It’s meant to help with secondary housing costs in Ottawa incurred as a result of attendance requirements in the upper house.

In Duffy’s case, critics argue his red-brick home in suburban Ottawa is his primary residence, and has been for years. Thus, he shouldn’t be claiming the allowance.

For his part, Duffy asserts his compact clapboard bungalow in P.E.I., which he has owned since 1998, is his primary residence.

But surely the significant point here is that Duffy is obliged to maintain two residences because of his Senate job.

Who cares which one is primary and which is secondary? A second home is a costly undertaking for anyone, even a senator with a $130,000-a-year income.

(At least Duffy lives in Canada; remember senator Andy Thompson, expelled in 1997 for poor attendance because he was living in Mexico?)

It’s reasonable for taxpayers to kick in toward senators’ Ottawa housing costs — except, obviously, those representing areas around Ottawa who have their properties in the Ottawa-Gatineau region.

In any event, the housing expense regulations need updating. They should stipulate that senators can be eligible for reimbursement of Ottawa housing costs when they also keep a home — as they must — more than 100 kilometres away in the province they represent.

The regulations should also be updated because it’s ridiculous in 2013 to require a senator to own property worth at lest $4,000 in their home province. That sum wouldn’t buy a square foot of mud in Vancouver.

The Senate Standing Committee on Internal Economy announced Friday it has commissioned an independent audit to scrutinize housing expenses and residency claims of not just Duffy, but also senators Brazeau and Mac Harb.

Brazeau and Harb’s claims are more questionable given they are Ontario senators. Indeed Brazeau has cited his father’s residence near Ottawa as one of his properties.

All that said, any absolution of Duffy in no way should make Canadians feel better about the Senate.

It’s a patronage repository, absurdly offering appointees jobs for life to age 75, courtesy of the PM. It also egregiously unbalanced in terms of provincial representation.

For some reason, more senators have got in trouble with the law over the years than MPs, reflecting negatively on the chamber.

All of which might be tolerable if the institution did compelling work.

But how many Canadians can name their province’s senators? And how many can cite the last worthwhile thing the Senate has done for taxpayers?

Comments

We encourage all readers to share their views on our articles and blog posts. We are committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion, so we ask you to avoid personal attacks, and please keep your comments relevant and respectful. If you encounter a comment that is abusive, click the "X" in the upper right corner of the comment box to report spam or abuse. We are using Facebook commenting. Visit our FAQ page for more information.

Almost Done!

Postmedia wants to improve your reading experience as well as share the best deals and promotions from our advertisers with you. The information below will be used to optimize the content and make ads across the network more relevant to you. You can always change the information you share with us by editing your profile.

By clicking "Create Account", I hearby grant permission to Postmedia to use my account information to create my account.

I also accept and agree to be bound by Postmedia's Terms and Conditions with respect to my use of the Site and I have read and understand Postmedia's Privacy Statement. I consent to the collection, use, maintenance, and disclosure of my information in accordance with the Postmedia's Privacy Policy.

Postmedia wants to improve your reading experience as well as share the best deals and promotions from our advertisers with you. The information below will be used to optimize the content and make ads across the network more relevant to you. You can always change the information you share with us by editing your profile.

By clicking "Create Account", I hearby grant permission to Postmedia to use my account information to create my account.

I also accept and agree to be bound by Postmedia's Terms and Conditions with respect to my use of the Site and I have read and understand Postmedia's Privacy Statement. I consent to the collection, use, maintenance, and disclosure of my information in accordance with the Postmedia's Privacy Policy.