...have you seen that picture that these people in the studies of genetics and technology re-created using theories of ageing and such...they created a picture of what John may have looked like at age 64, I saw the picture and it was...well just see fer yerself if ye haven't already

guitarhero2000

sorry but that's a poor picture, they've basically just fattened out the original.i saw a far better one when the Anthology came out, they did a parody of the let it be cover with 90's pictures of the other three and a mock-up of John with short, grey hair. i think he'd be fully grey (probably through stress) and would have short hair and probably a few traits of trying to still look hip, an earring perhaps or turned-up jeans

[quote by=RICKENBACKER325 link=Blah.pl?b=lennon,m=1098844574,s=2 date=1098846168]The aged picture did'nt look too diffrent from the original picture, anyway he still would look a whole lot better than McCartney does now![/quote]

i agree with both things!

Logged

Ashley*

one sweet dream, pick up the bags and get in the limousine. soon we'll be away from here. step on the gas and wipe that tear away. one sweet dream came true today...

Runforyourlife

I wonder if John would still be intensely into that whoel Macrobiotic philosophy. He was pretty dedicated to that whole whole-wheat, non-dairy, non-meat, etc. crap, wasn't he? But he did still smoke, though I know he was always quitting.

One thing I know...he seemed to be adament about taking good care of himself in those last years. He was all about watching what he ate and drank, and he had that book "Sugar Blues." I read that.

I actually think he looked good in his last years, but he was TOOOOOO skinny. He could have gained, like, 30 pounds.