Considering we NRA members and the National NRA institution has vigorously campaigned for and helped elect PROGUN President Donald Trump. Are any cal gunners who camp going to boycott Camping World over the comments by their CEO?http://www.dailywire.com/news/20164/...cus-john-nolte

"Marcus Lemonis: There’s no doubt that there is [sic] probably not many consumers in this country today that are in favor of what has been said in the last couple of days and if they are, quite frankly don’t shop at my business..."

Well done Mr Lemonis! I will NEVER shop at Camping World or the recently acquired Gander Mountain, per your request !

__________________
Contradictions do not exist. Whenever you think you are facing a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong.
Ayn Rand

I am not boycotting them, I just don't go there because they are too expensive, as well as not near men. Comes out to the same thing. If they lowered their prices and opened a location closer, then I might boycott them :-).

Been to one, wasn't impressed. Went looking for camping supplies which is what I thought they sold, given their name. I quickly learned their name should be Overpriced RV Stuff With Rude Salespeople instead.

For the record, camping to me involves a tent and sleeping bag. RVs are cheating.

__________________
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side kid" -Han Solo

pretty sure all of us arent going to be going to camping world or gander mountain (both own and run by lemonis). we had a thread on it awhile ago when those comments were made.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdtx2001

Been to one, wasn't impressed. Went looking for camping supplies which is what I thought they sold, given their name. I quickly learned their name should be Overpriced RV Stuff With Rude Salespeople instead.

For the record, camping to me involves a tent and sleeping bag. RVs are cheating.

my ex's family thought "camping" was pulling their $2 million dollar bus into a spot and hitting the expansion button.

i will be honest though that i am a truck camper, i bring in a ton of stuff and sleep comfortably in a 6 person tent on an air mattress.

I hate camping world.Bought a new travel trailer from then a few years ago.The quality of the trailer was horrible from the start,which wasn't camping world fault.The icing on the cake was camping worlds service department,Service was horrible.My jayco had way to many major issues in the 2 years I owned it.It got to a point I was afraid to use it because I knew something else major would happen.Once warranty was up I cut my losses and traded it in at another dealer.My new unit has been great,a few minor issues but nothing major.

This weekend we went there and man what a selection. We were putting everything you can imagine in our cart. Eventually our cart was so heavy it would hardly roll as we pushed it up to check out. Must have had about 3000 items in it.

I am not a Trump fan, but he was right when he said there were problems on both sides, which is unacceptable to the liberals. When a CEO brings in politics, it shows exactly how stupid they are. The CEO of Starbucks got the boot, but they brought in another idiot.

So are you all boycotting the company because you agree with what Trump said about the Charlottesville incident or because the guy has simply said something negative about Trump?

Yes I agree with what I heard Trump say about Charlottesville as reported here.

"There was no way of making a correct statement that early,” the president said of his initial response to the attack, which many observers characterized as insufficient condemnation of white supremacy and extremism. “Unlike you and unlike the media, before I make a statement, I like to know the facts.”

The president also lashed out at the media for its “inaccurate” reporting surrounding the incident, and said that blame for the violence at the protest belonged to “both sides.”

I also will boycott them because he said negative things about President Trump and those who voted for him.
Another really strong reason for me to boycott them is that they no doubt support the democrat party and their gun grabbing agenda!

__________________
Contradictions do not exist. Whenever you think you are facing a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong.
Ayn Rand

Camping World is buying up a lot of mom and pop, local RV places, too. Not just big box retailers like Gander. A smaller, locally owned place just down the highway from me was recently bought out by CW. The old place did a crap-ton of RV rentals and sales, not sure how it'll fare now.

Wounded Knee is the prime example of why the Second Amendment exists, and why we shouldn’t be in such a hurry to surrender our Right to Bear Arms.
Without the Second Amendment we have no way to defend ourselves and our families.

When we were younger we used too desert camp with 3 wheelers and a buggy,
never did any business with Camping World. Since we are older now and don't camp any longer, I guess I'll continue not to by from them. Have no need too!

Yes I agree with what I heard Trump say about Charlottesville as reported here.

"There was no way of making a correct statement that early,” the president said of his initial response to the attack, which many observers characterized as insufficient condemnation of white supremacy and extremism. “Unlike you and unlike the media, before I make a statement, I like to know the facts.”

The president also lashed out at the media for its “inaccurate” reporting surrounding the incident, and said that blame for the violence at the protest belonged to “both sides.”

I also will boycott them because he said negative things about President Trump and those who voted for him.
Another really strong reason for me to boycott them is that they no doubt support the democrat party and their gun grabbing agenda!

I'm sure that some forms of violence at the Charlottesville incident could be attributed to both sides. But Charlottesville made so much news because of one form of violence - murder. And that can be only attributed to one person who identified with only one side. And when you choose to ignore that, you are at the very least, being biased against one side.

So whether or not that CEO made a mistake in politicizing his business, I don't care. I have not been offended and I will not be boycotting.

I'm sure that some forms of violence at the Charlottesville incident could be attributed to both sides. But Charlottesville made so much news because of one form of violence - murder. And that can be only attributed to one person who identified with only one side. And when you choose to ignore that, you are at the very least, being biased against one side.

Really? It can only be one side?

So did you see the photo of a "peaceful" protester hitting the car with a club? This was before anything done by the driver.

Did you hear that other vehicles had been attacked?

Did you hear that the vehicle is not actually the one that ran over people? He hit another vehicle and pushed it, which is what hit people. That is not typical for those type of intentional acts as it is not as effective and most would not do it that way intentionally.

So no thought that the vehicle was attacked and the driver panicked? I don't know what happened, but the media silence is screaming that it is not what they want it to be, what they convinced you it was.

So did you see the photo of a "peaceful" protester hitting the car with a club? This was before anything done by the driver.

Did you hear that other vehicles had been attacked?

Did you hear that the vehicle is not actually the one that ran over people? He hit another vehicle and pushed it, which is what hit people. That is not typical for those type of intentional acts as it is not as effective and most would not do it that way intentionally.

So no thought that the vehicle was attacked and the driver panicked? I don't know what happened, but the media silence is screaming that it is not what they want it to be, what they convinced you it was.

Looks like he was driving straight toward the crowd when he got hit anyway. Sure he sped up after he got hit, but it just the act of pushing the car through the crowd is physically aggressive as well. Whatever; I don't have time to analyze it any more than that.

Looks like he was driving straight toward the crowd when he got hit anyway. Sure he sped up after he got hit, but it just the act of pushing the car through the crowd is physically aggressive as well. Whatever; I don't have time to analyze it any more than that.

In other words, you are just going to go with what the media told you.

It is hard to tell in that video what happened before. The backing up makes it look like he was trying to get away, not on an agenda to run people over. Perhaps you could claim he ran enough people over by pushing other cars, so he was done at that point.

I still like the claim of peaceful protesters, with clubs and bats, hitting vehicles, etc.

Cars do drive in the streets, people are supposed to be on the sidewalk and crosswalk.

In other words, you are just going to go with what the media told you.

It is hard to tell in that video what happened before. The backing up makes it look like he was trying to get away, not on an agenda to run people over. Perhaps you could claim he ran enough people over by pushing other cars, so he was done at that point.

I still like the claim of peaceful protesters, with clubs and bats, hitting vehicles, etc.

Cars do drive in the streets, people are supposed to be on the sidewalk and crosswalk.

Dude, don't put words in my mouth. I haven't said one thing about the media. Where are you getting your information from anyway? The media? Or were you there personally? Since you like to base your argument on assumptions I'm going to assume that you weren't there personally and all of your claims are based off some kind of media. I'm also going to assume that it was based off some media with a right wing agenda and that your opinion is biased. If not, please do tell us what source you are getting your information from.

And "Backing up makes it look like he was trying to get away?" Really?
That is supposed to exonerate him in some way? More criminals try to get away from their crime scene than not. You, yourself, said that he had already crashed into cars ahead. Reversing was his only way out.

And I have never heard of people jay walking in the street as reason make it okay to run them over. If by accident, the driver doesn't see them then sure. This driver clearly saw them. I guess I'll continue to assume that you believe that there were no right wing protesters jay walking that day.

You also say that "its hard to tell in that video what happened before." I agree; we cannot assume anything. But the fact is that the guy has been given criminal charges. That means the police have gathered enough evidence to where they believe he is at fault. Didn't Trump just give some speech in which he said we need to let the police do their jobs? Or should we assume that they have been tainted by the left leaning media as well?

Dude, don't put words in my mouth. I haven't said one thing about the media. Where are you getting your information from anyway? The media? Or were you there personally? Since you like to base your argument on assumptions I'm going to assume that you weren't there personally and all of your claims are based off some kind of media. I'm also going to assume that it was based off some media with a right wing agenda and that your opinion is biased. If not, please do tell us what source you are getting your information from.

I did not put the words in your mouth, you did. You believe the story that the media is telling. I have gotten information from multiple sources, which provide information that the MSM is giving.

You can make assumptions, but you can also be wrong. It is quite funny that you assume I have to be biased by right wing agenda because you are wrong.

Did you see that the people in the vehicle in front are suing? Why wasn't it mentioned in the MSM when it happened?

Quote:

And "Backing up makes it look like he was trying to get away?" Really?
That is supposed to exonerate him in some way? More criminals try to get away from their crime scene than not. You, yourself, said that he had already crashed into cars ahead. Reversing was his only way out.

Was backing up the only way out? How do you know that? But you know exactly what he did and why, right? I am pointing issues which raise questions to say that we don't know all of the details, so it is not the time to judge just yet.

Quote:

And I have never heard of people jay walking in the street as reason make it okay to run them over. If by accident, the driver doesn't see them then sure. This driver clearly saw them. I guess I'll continue to assume that you believe that there were no right wing protesters jay walking that day.

More made up stuff by you. If he was attacked, then his reaction to that is not perfect for you? You have not idea of why the driver did what he did, but you claim that you do. It might have been intentional, but it might have also been a reaction to being attacked, but you have been convinced as to what happened. Were you there? Were in the vehicle?

Quote:

You also say that "its hard to tell in that video what happened before." I agree; we cannot assume anything. But the fact is that the guy has been given criminal charges. That means the police have gathered enough evidence to where they believe he is at fault. Didn't Trump just give some speech in which he said we need to let the police do their jobs? Or should we assume that they have been tainted by the left leaning media as well?

But you already have assumed many things. You mean like Zimmerman was charged due to politics when the police did not want to? Look at all the other cases where the main evidence was political, not real.

__________________
If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.
-Samuel Adams

So whether or not that CEO made a mistake in politicizing his business and telling you Bad White Conservative Republican Trump Nazis to go to hell, I don't care. I have not been offended and I will not be boycotting.

Considering we NRA members and the National NRA institution has vigorously campaigned for and helped elect PROGUN President Donald Trump. Are any cal gunners who camp going to boycott Camping World over the comments by their CEO?http://www.dailywire.com/news/20164/...cus-john-nolte

"Marcus Lemonis: There’s no doubt that there is [sic] probably not many consumers in this country today that are in favor of what has been said in the last couple of days and if they are, quite frankly don’t shop at my business..."

Well done Mr Lemonis! I will NEVER shop at Camping World or the recently acquired Gander Mountain, per your request !

It doesn't matter to many here what he said just look at all of posts with people still shopping at Dicks. it like the duck hunters supporting the "assault weapons ban"

__________________
Do not fear the enemy, for your enemy can only take your life. It is far better that you fear the media, for they will steal your Honour