Virtual Talmud

A Response to Christopher Hitchens’ ‘Hanukkah’

Christopher Hitchens is more than a clever chap. He is one of those rare public intellectuals that no matter what is the subject matter being addressed one can sit and listen to him rant and rave for hours on end. Few posses as good of a grasp on so many topics. But with all his brilliance the past couple of years Hitchens has played more the role of provocateur than the deep thoughtful and incisive thinker. No I don’t just mean his honest but misguided support of the Iraq war (many made such a mistake). We all sometime call them the wrong way. Hitchens latest misfire is far more problematic, namely it has been on the role of religion.

Earlier this year Hitchens published his secular tirade, “Why God is not Great,” which more than anything else was a book on why black and white depictions of religion get you nowhere fast in understanding anyone who believes anything. Of course, I agree with Hitchens that fundementalism–religious, secular or any other–is bad for the world. But Hitchens fails to understand the real allures of religion and why it continues to capture the hearts and souls of so many people around the world. Most recently, he used the holiday of Hanukkah as a launching pad for another attack against religion. In a recent essay published in Slate, Hitchens characterizes the holiday as a celebration of Jewish backwardness. There, he argues:
“Thus, to celebrate Hanukkah is to celebrate not just the triumph of tribal Jewish backwardness but also the accidental birth of Judaism’s bastard child in the shape of Christianity.”
For Hitchen’s, Hanukkah is a celebration the victory of Jerusalem over Athens, faith over reason, and Jewish tribalism over universal Greek thought. To some degree Hitchen’s is right. There are a some sources that go in his direction and a few writers and rabbis that continue to see the holiday as some great ideological battle. As we saw in Rabbi Grossman’s neo-Marxist reading of Hanukkah, like Hitchen’s, she sees the holiday as being about some war of ideologies. (Whereas for Hitchen’s Hanukkah is a clash of civilizations story, for Grossman, it’s a battle against big business). While there is no doubt that such elements exist in the Hanukah story (though I doubt the two thousand-year-old book of the Macabees had much, if anything, to do with Fortune Five Hundred companies), the rabbis of the Talmud present a very different understanding of what the holiday stands for. In the tractate Avodah Zarah we are told:
“When Adam saw the day gradually diminishing, he said, “Woe is me! Perhaps because I sinned, the world around me is growing darker and darker, and is about to return to chaos and confusion, and this is the death heaven has decreed for me. He then sat eight days in fast and prayer. But when the winter solstice arrived, and he saw the days getting gradually longer, he said, “Such is the way of the world,” and proceeded to observe eight days of festivity. The following years he observed both the eight days preceding and the eight days following the solstice as days of festivity.” (Babylonian Talmud, Avodah Zarah 8a)
As Rabbi Shimon Felix explained to a group of us at The Samuel Bronfman Foundation, what we call Hanukkah–where we light candles for eight days–is actually a holiday that celebrates the human ability to understand nature. In other words, Hitchens could not be more wrong. Hanukkah is the most universal of holidays–a holiday whose origins revolve around honoring the most basic form of human reason and realizing the rhythm and logic of the natural order of things. Not only is Hanukkah’s origins not tribal, cultic or Jewishly particularistic, but rather it is just the opposite. It is a holiday that gives dignity to human wisdom and understanding over and against fear and superstition.

Hmmm, so Hitchens may have issues with self-hatred? That is interesting.
In general I find Christopher’s tirades a bit entertaining because he is so Theistic in his assumptions that all theology is “wrong” and his passion to let people know that.
I guess we could call him an Evangelical Atheist.

At least Hitchens didn’t treat Chanukah as the Jewish Christmas, nor did he talk about Chanukah as a happy talk holiday.
People should read the Books of the Maccabees if they want to know what Chanukah is about, namely the Miracle of Lights that occured just after the rededication of the temple which had been defiled by both Greek-Syrians and insufficiently Jewish Jews, both of whom the Maccabees fought and killed.

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Previous Posts

The Task Is Never FinishedIt has been heartwarming to read the warm responses to Rabbi Waxman's post asking Beliefnet to reconsider its decision to cancel Virtual Talmud. Virtual Talmud offered an alternative model for internet communications: civil discourse pursued in postings over a time frame of days (rather than moments

Some Parting ReflectionsWell, loyal readers, all good things must come to an end and we’ve been informed that this particular experiment in blogging as a forum for creating wide-ranging discussion on topics of interest to contemporary Jews has run its course. Maybe it’s that blogging doesn’t lend itself so well to t

Obama's Lesson and The Jewish CommunityThere are few times in this blog’s history when I have felt that Rabbi Grossman was one hundred percent correct in her criticisms of my ideas. However, a few weeks ago she called me out for citing a few crack websites on Barak Obama’s advisors. She was right. I never should have cited those web

The Future of Race RelationsAs a post-baby boomer, it is interesting to me to see how much of today’s conversation about racial relations is still rooted in the 1960s experience and rhetoric of the civil rights struggle, and the disenchantment that followed. Many in the black and Jewish communities look to this period either

Wright and Wrong of Race and JewsYears ago, as a rabbinical student, I was one of a group of rabbinical students who visited an African American seminary in Atlanta. My fellow rabbinical students and I expected an uplifting weekend of interfaith sharing like we had experienced in visits to other (largely white) seminaries. We were