Monitoring Is Key In Debate Over CWD Testing

Republish this content

WisContext serves the residents of Wisconsin, providing information and insight into issues as they affect the state. We report on these issues, drawing upon the resources of our project partners: Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television and Cooperative Extension. We want to share what we've learned, and you are welcome to republish our articles online and/or in print subject to the following guidelines:

Only articles credited to WisContext or its partners Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television and Cooperative Extension may be republished. If an article is credited to another organization, it is not available for republishing from our website under these guidelines.

Articles may not be edited, except to fit a publication’s house style requirements or to shorten it. If an article is shortened, please add the note “This item was edited for length.” If republishing online, please try to retain links that are already included in the article.

Please credit the article to the original author(s) and WisContext. Please use this style: [Author name], WisContext (or any of the three partner organizations if the item is originally credited to them). Please also link to wiscontext.org in the credit.

When republishing any WisContext article, this credit must be included: [Article Title] was originally published on WisContext, which produced the article in a partnership between Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television and Cooperative Extension.

By republishing articles under these guidelines, you agree to immediately remove our content from your site if we contact you and request that you do so.

Photos, graphics and data visualizations may be republished with articles if they are credited to WisContext or its three partners: Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television or Cooperative Extension. They may not be published separately from articles. If photos, graphics or data visualizations are not credited to WisContext or its partners, they may only be republished per their original copyright restrictions. (WisContext often uses Creative Commons-licensed images, and follows their republishing guidelines.)

WisContext articles may not be sold. Please do not sell advertising against WisContext articles, but they may be republished online or in print with existing ads.

If you republish our articles, please send us a note with a link to where it appears. Thank you for sharing!

Richards: "The amount of sampling has gone down precipitously since the disease was first detected."

The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources has identified thousands of deer infected with chronic wasting disease over the last 17 years. Though it has been identified in 18 counties, CWD is concentrated in two specific areas of southern Wisconsin, one west of Madison spanning eastern Iowa County and western Dane County, and one near Janesville that covers eastern Rock County and western Walworth County.

But the total number of animals affected and the geographic breadth of the disease is at the heart of policy differences over how to address the disease, and not everyone agrees on how much CWD threatens the state's deer population in the long run.

Bryan Richards, a CWD expert with the U.S. Geological Survey, says the state is underestimating how many deer are infected with this always fatal degenerative condition. In a May 27, 2016 interview on Wisconsin Public Television's Here And Now, Richards said that current DNR monitoring is at best finding 20 percent of the infected deer in the state.

"The rate at which it got to that high prevalence level is unprecedented in free-ranging populations," said Richards, who also consults with the DNR.

Your browser does not support iframes, but you can use the following link. Link

But Richards' projections are rejected by Wisconsin's former deer czar, James Kroll.

Quoted in The Capital Times, Kroll suggested that the numbers reflect improving state surveillance of CWD. "The disease is not spreading," he said. "We're just sampling and we're looking for it and we're finding it."

Kroll, reached by email, declined additional comment for this story, but did note that he plans to publish a white paper about the subject within the next couple of weeks.

Data gathered by the DNR, though, show the state has annually tested fewer and fewer deer since 2002, but the percentage testing positive for CWD is rising. And even as the sample size has shrunk, the absolute number of positive tests has generally increased over the last 14 years. (In a May 19 radio address, Gov. Scott Walker said the state has tested more than 193,000 deer for CWD. This number is the cumulative total of all deer the state has sampled since it began monitoring in 1999.) The DNR's testing results can be searched in more detail online.

One potential issue is that DNR figures don't provide a clear statewide trend for CWD occurrence because different monitoring regimens were in place during different years.

In some years — as in 2002, after the state's first confirmed CWD cases — officials conducted a statewide monitoring sweep. But in most other years, the DNR focused on the specific hot spots in southern Wisconsin where CWD has already been documented and adjoining areas to learn if the disease has spread. In 2002, 0.5 percent of all deer sampled tested positive, and in 2015, 9.48 percent tested positive. But the 2002 data reflect more than 40,000 deer tested across the state, while the 2015 data covers about 3,000 animals from regions where CWD was already present or could easily spread. Pointing to a direct trend from one year to the other would not be accurate.

"It's showing that it's taken huge jumps and percentages, and that's wrong, but it is spreading," Vojtik said.

Due to this concern, Vojtik wants to see deer farmers and hunters adopt some best practices for biosecurity. And while he has opposed new regulations on deer farms like double fencing and wrote a WPR commentary rebuffing people who say they contribute to the spread of the CWD, Vojtik also said he's been "reading a lot of research papers and talking to a lot of researchers." He thinks the DNR's sampling focuses disproportionately on sick deer.

"They're testing more sick deer, they're testing more roadkill, so the numbers are skewed," said Vojtik. "Last year we did phone-in registration, so they said they ended up with fewer deer to test."

Vojtik is referring to the 2015 launch of DNR's new electronic-registration system, in which hunters report their deer harvest by phone or online. As Wisconsin Public Television's Zac Schultz reported on Nov. 26, 2015, this system presents some difficulties for hunters. One issue is that mobile phone and data service isn't always reliable in remote, rural areas, and another is how the electronic system waters down the social component of hunters gathering in-person at registration stations to share stories and display their deer. This latter change in turn offers hunters less motivation to stop by a DNR sampling station where officials can take tissue samples to test for CWD.

"The simple answer is that the trends are consistent [across those areas]," said Tom Hauge, director of the DNR's Bureau of Wildlife Management. "I don't think the data supports that we're finding more because we're looking for it more," he added.

Hauge says the DNR plans to stick with its geographically targeted approach to testing for CWD, and doesn't plan to do another statewide sweep any time soon.

Richards also directly dismissed the argument that higher CWD rates are simply a result of better testing.

"If you look at the sampling data from the state of Wisconsin, due to fiscal constraints, the amount of sampling has gone down precipitously since the disease was first detected," Richards said. "So we're looking at fewer animals each year but finding the same or more positives each year."

Editor's note: This article has been updated with additional reporting on the DNR's electronic registration system for deer hunters.

Commenting Policy

WisContext welcomes civil, on-topic comments and opinions that advance the discussion from all perspectives of an issue. Comments containing outside links (URLs) will only be posted after they’ve been approved by a moderator. WisContext will delete comments that violate our guidelines. Visit our social media guidelines for more information about these policies.