WAT?!?!? Why? Maybe their behavior is ahead of time and everybody will act like this soon.

dNote: You guys should really, really do these three things.

- Explain the motivation and greater strategy/vision, behind your various mostly non-sustainable commercial and community projects, around CN.

- Stop creating pretended neutral, objective community websites, projects or organizations around CN. With the intent to abuse them, to promote your projects, securing your information superiority around CN and preventing the creation of a real community around CN (you wont control 100% anymore).

Your behavior is harming CryptoNote-technology. It's already visible, many CN users and people interested in CN tech are refusing to work with you and/or don't care about your ideas/next plans for the tech dev, community development or the announcement of yet another coin, out of your CryptoNote-coin-generator. Most serious people I talked with just labeled you guys as crazy and not trust-worthy.

Open up and talk and exchange with the CN-users, researcher and devs. If not, nobody will care for any of your projects or work related to CN technology.

- Reevaluate your opinion about Monero. There is absolutely no reason for your aggression against the project or your activities to sabotage Moneros development.At least accept Monero and be neutral. No one is talking about cooperations or team members becoming friends and exchanging christmas cards. Just stop the bullshit. And use your resources and time for something positive.Monero is the biggest CN coin, has a fair setup, is very open & democratic and is hurting no one. No valid reasons to hate. Last but not least, if you disavow or not, the whole CN eco-system and your own CN-based projects are benefiting from the software development and infrastructure creation that is done by The Monero Project.

This is my 100% unbiased opinion and 0% influenced by my decision to support Monero. Don't reply, just really think about it. If u really care about CN technology sooner or later you will see these three points are without alternatives, if you want to stay part of CN mid-term development & future.

... just unfair. As always.

1. Explain the motivation and greater strategy/vision, behind your various mostly non-sustainable commercial and community projects, around CN.

- explained many times, will do it again- our ONLY project is XDN = duckNOTE = DarkNOTE. Motivation = launching new FREE economy >70% of emission in the very first to open it to free markets, to exclude the miners influence and eventually to implement PoS on the top of fair PoS.

2. The only websites we are working on are websites around XDN. And we will make lots of projects around/ Soon you will see the results.

3. All you statement is about XDN devs affiliation with CN devs and other coins devs. Again and again and again, how can you be such a Morono lovers, XDN devs are independent individuals cooperated for a long time, and have a long experience in cryptos, but not here on forums. Actually it took a quite a long time to understand your blaming when it initially occurs, some a parts of our team are still saying : whaaaat? As i can understand, according to your logic, all who are not a Monero devs, are Bytecoin devs. Sorry, we are not.

As for me - monero is a biggest bubble, because there is only speculation about it, blockchain is unusable with its size, IMO almost everything about monero seems terrible - unusable blockchain size (On average PC, it just can`t be a network node), block intervals, tx generation size, fee size, no GUI after almost 1 year since start, totally wrong way of development, looks like just no understanding of CN technology.

"software development and infrastructure creation that is done by The Monero Project. " lol you are confirming my words - XRM devs can`t develop the coin, because of low technology understanding, they just make some poor services around original source code, like closed source web wallets. There is nothing that monero gives to cryptocurrency world, except the wrong way in understanding the new technology, such a pity.

To you too. I wish they won't run it on a Saturday afternoon in the US, as that makes it the night to Monday for Europe and Africa, which is just very inconvenient. Why not Saturday afternoon?

One answer I found was that advertisers want you sober for the commercials and a Sunday evening keeps most people sober (or at least more so) because you have to work Monday.

Also Superbowl Sunday is trademarked and playing it on Sunday is tradition which is treated as Holy to some people.The early super bowls were never the global events that they are today and didn't have to consider the time differential, so what to do about it now? Change the date and risk losing advertising dollars or pissing off your core demographic? I think the NFL MEW had a 100% vote to keep it as is.

"[–]dangero 29 points 7 hours ago You can't track every single satoshi. Multiple inputs can be combined into a single output. At that point you cannot say which satoshi came from which input. Once they're mixed like that you can't separate them again and say which part came from where. It's like pouring multiple smaller cups of water into one larger cup. Once they are combined and mixed you can't provably separate them again. Even if you pour half out into another cup, who is to say where that half originally came from? Bitcoin is absolutely fungible."

What is the estimated maximum transactions per second (TPS) of the monero network / protocol?

i've bitcoin is currently 7 TPS. Monero is?

There is no hard protocol-defined limit the way there is in Bitcoin. In the original Cryptonote white paper, hard coded constants are given as a reason to want to improve on Bitcoin. (Sections 2.4 and 6.2.2 at least.)

What the limits turn out to be in practice will a function of technology (bandwidth, storage, etc.) and how it is used.

"[–]dangero 29 points 7 hours ago You can't track every single satoshi. Multiple inputs can be combined into a single output. At that point you cannot say which satoshi came from which input. Once they're mixed like that you can't separate them again and say which part came from where. It's like pouring multiple smaller cups of water into one larger cup. Once they are combined and mixed you can't provably separate them again. Even if you pour half out into another cup, who is to say where that half originally came from? Bitcoin is absolutely fungible."

The reddit poster is correct. Once you make a new transaction, you cannot tell which satoshi in the output came from which input. You can therefore not "follow" the way an individual satoshi took from its creation through the blockchain.

Now, keep in mind that this doesn't keep you from drawing some conclusions about the transactions/senders themselves. Even if we cannot track a single satoshi, by combining knowledge about multiple transactions you can sometimes figure out who sent what to whom.

What is the estimated maximum transactions per second (TPS) of the monero network / protocol?

i've bitcoin is currently 7 TPS. Monero is?

There is no hard protocol-defined limit the way there is in Bitcoin. In the original Cryptonote white paper, hard coded constants are given as a reason to want to improve on Bitcoin. (Sections 2.4 and 6.2.2 at least.)

What the limits turn out to be in practice will a function of technology (bandwidth, storage, etc.) and how it is used.

Keep in mind that the limits in Bitcoin are not limitations of the protocol either. They are limits built into the reference client in order to prevent spam, and can be easily lifted ("easily" is of course a matter of discussion, see the debate around the max block size and the required fork )

"[–]dangero 29 points 7 hours ago You can't track every single satoshi. Multiple inputs can be combined into a single output. At that point you cannot say which satoshi came from which input. Once they're mixed like that you can't separate them again and say which part came from where. It's like pouring multiple smaller cups of water into one larger cup. Once they are combined and mixed you can't provably separate them again. Even if you pour half out into another cup, who is to say where that half originally came from? Bitcoin is absolutely fungible."

The reddit poster is correct. Once you make a new transaction, you cannot tell which satoshi in the output came from which input. You can therefore not "follow" the way an individual satoshi took from its creation through the blockchain.

Now, keep in mind that this doesn't keep you from drawing some conclusions about the transactions/senders themselves. Even if we cannot track a single satoshi, by combining knowledge about multiple transactions you can sometimes figure out who sent what to whom.

It is simpler than that. Unless some form of mixing is being used, every input of a tranasction has the same owner. So every such transaction and every output is directly linkable to that owner. If the owner is using stolen bitcoin or some other form of "bad" bitcoin then every output of that transaction is tainted.

If mixing is used, then you have the issues of effectiveness (are enough people using it at the same time, are their transactions of similar size) and trust (is the mixer going to steal your coins or keep records of which inputs correspond with which outputs).

What is the estimated maximum transactions per second (TPS) of the monero network / protocol?

i've bitcoin is currently 7 TPS. Monero is?

There is no hard protocol-defined limit the way there is in Bitcoin. In the original Cryptonote white paper, hard coded constants are given as a reason to want to improve on Bitcoin. (Sections 2.4 and 6.2.2 at least.)

What the limits turn out to be in practice will a function of technology (bandwidth, storage, etc.) and how it is used.

Keep in mind that the limits in Bitcoin are not limitations of the protocol either. They are limits built into the reference client in order to prevent spam, and can be easily lifted ("easily" is of course a matter of discussion, see the debate around the max block size and the required fork )

I disagree. The protocol as currently defined (by the code, though certainly the limit is also well known and well documented too) requires that all blocks be rejected if they exceed 1 MB. If you don't do this your blocks will be rejected (even if they aren't > 1 MB, if they build on blocks that are). It is not simply a matter of the reference client not creating 1 MB blocks itself. Every other client must follow the same rule or its blocks will be rejected. Even if a non-mining node doesn't create blocks but relays non-conforming blocks, it will be dropped and banned, so to participate in the network every relay node must also apply the same rule.

The reason a hard fork is needed is to change the protocol. That does not apply to Monero.