Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.

Religious violence and Extremism (also called Communal violence[1]) is a term that covers all phenomena where religion, in any of its forms, is either the subject or object of individual or collective violent behaviour.[2] Concretely, it covers both violence by religiously motivated individuals or religious institutions of any kind, of the same religion, a different sect, or secular targets. The other case is of violence of any kind against objects that are explicitly religious (such as religious institutions, the persecution of people on the basis of their religion, religious buildings or sites).

Religious violence, like all violence, is an inherently cultural process whose meanings are context-dependent. It may be worth noting that religious violence often tends to place great emphasis on the symbolic aspect of the act. Religious violence is primarily the domain of the violent "actor", which may be distinguished between individual and collective forms of violence.

Contents

Buddhist terrorism

Christian terrorism

Christian terrorism is religious terrorism by groups or individuals, the motivation of which is typically rooted in an idiosyncratic interpretation of the Bible and other Christian tenets of faith. From the viewpoint of the terrorist, Christian scripture and theology provide justification for violent political activities.

In the beginning, Christianity was terrorized ruthlessly, with members losing their property, citizenship, privileges, tortured and often killed by Roman authorities. When Emperor Constantine became a Christian, it was declared the state religion and the scales had reversed. The pagans were persecuted brutally and forced to convert. A wave of conversions backed up with force spread Christianity across Europe, until Lithuania fell as the last pagan nation. The Crusades pitted Roman Catholics against Muslims, who had used the same methods. As recounted by many sources, when Jerusalem fell the first time, every Muslim and Jew in the city was killed, except perhaps for a few spared by less ruthless Crusaders. On the way, dissident monks and Eastern Christians had also been attacked, even slaughtered. Heretical Christian sects were stamped out by force, often with followers massacred or forced to give up their beliefs. When the Reformation occurred, the Popes tortured and kill millions of Protestants.[1]

Ian Gilmour has cited the historical case of the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre as an instance of papal terrorism on par with modern day terrorism, and goes on to write, "That massacre, said Pope Gregory XIII, gave him more pleasure than fifty Battles of Lepanto, and he commissioned Vasari to paint frescoes of it in the Vatican".[3] It is estimated that ten thousand to possibly one-hundred thousand Huguenots (French Protestants) were killed by Catholic mobs, and it has been called "the worst of the century's religious massacres".[4] The massacre led to the start of the fourth war of the French Wars of Religion.Peter Steinfels has cited the historical case of the Gunpowder Plot, when Guy Fawkes and other Catholic revolutionaries attempted to overthrow the Protestant aristocracy of England by blowing up the Houses of Parliament, as a notable case of Christian terrorism.[5]

The hijacking of four passenger jets and the destruction of the World Trade Center on September 112001, in the United States of America was a significant attack. The controversies surrounding the subject include whether the terrorist act is self-defense or aggression, national self-determination or Islamic supremacy; whether Islam can ever condone the targeting of noncombatants; whether some attacks described as Islamic terrorism are merely terrorist acts committed by Muslims or motivated by nationalism; whether Zionism and the Arab-Israeli Conflict is the root of Islamic terrorism, or simply one cause; how much support there is in the Muslim world for Islamic terrorism[9] and whether support for terror is a temporary phenomenon, a "bubble", now fading away.[10]

Collective religious violence

Collective religious violence is what we more commonly picture when we think of religious violence. The term "collective" refers, in effect, to any violent activity that is perpetrated within the context of society, is legitimated by at least a subset of society or religion and always has a politicaldimension. Note that the term "collective" does not mean that a single individual cannot undertake collective religious violence.

In most instances, serious religious violence is perpetrated by individuals belonging to social groups whose religious zeal and conviction exceed that of an average member of the wider society, although milder forms, such as verbal abuse or ostracism, can be habitually practiced by larger communities. The range of religious violence is varied, and in its more serious forms it often involves illegal means (although in some instances, the use of religious violence can be sanctioned and even undertaken by the government), such as physical abuse and vandalism, and in more extreme cases, torture or murder. Religious terrorism is one form of religious violence; the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center are thus an extreme example of religious violence. Human sacrifice and animal sacrifice are also forms of collective religious violence.

Even though religion is used to justify violent behavior, the immediate motivations of the individuals involved may not be religious as such, and the goals of such behavior may be cultural, personal or even economical.

Some contrast religious violence with sectarian violence, conflict between different sects of a single religion. However, the difference between a sect and an independent religion is not well defined.

“Collaboration against religious violence and Extremism” (CARVE)

A Pakistani activist and role model peace hero Mr. Inderias Dominic Bhatti [12];his wife Mrs. Shaheen Bhatti role model peace hero[13] equipped from United States Institute of Peace in “Interfaith Conflict Resolution” and Mohammad Ikhlaq, a peace activist [14] initiated a National peace group named “Collaboration against religious violence and Extremism” (CARVE) to respond in the present extremism and mindset of hatred of a tiny group of extremists among the Muslims in Pakistan. The other members include: Mr. James Rehmat, Mr. Naeem Tubasum, Mr. Kashif Nawab and Mrs. Rebecca Nadeem who have been peace activists for decades.

Vision

A society where Unconditional Love moves mutually

Mission

To foster peaceful coexistence among diverse groups in Pakistan from effective triangle of thoughts (mindset), words and doings

Goals

• An awareness of the seriousness of religious violence and extremism;
• To study hate and hate crimes in context to prevention, communal harmony and peace;
• An effective response to hate and hate crimes and violence;
• Contribute whatever we can, wherever it happened to be with our best possible resource and competencies limits in violence and extremism cases;
• To engage the like minded individuals, groups and institutions for joint effort against religious violence and extremism;
• To work as an informational center on issues related to religious violence and extremism.

Policy

To stand in solidarity with the like-minded individual and groups in Pakistan and abroad to build and foster Human dignity, mutual acceptance and social harmony.

Strategies

• Conscious building human dignity, mutual acceptance and social harmony;
• A non-proselytizing use of social, political, educational and religious motives that effectively inspire the common lots on humanitarian basis;
• Partnering with national and international individuals, groups and institutions in the vision of CARVE.

Area of operation

The activities of the organization will be in UC-142, Yohanabad, Nishtar Town, Lahore – 54760, Pakistan primarily but it can operate anywhere in Pakistan a per of the issues of religious violence and extremism.

The Nature of CARVE

It is a mrembership organization open to anyone in the world who agrees with the vision, mission and goal;

And affirms the declaration of CARVE.

The Declaration of CARVE

I dignify human being as per of my fellow being regardless of caste, color, creed, race and religion;

I will do whatever I can, wherever it happened to be with my best possible abilities and capabilities to help and heal, never to hurt or destroy;