Uncyclopedia:VFP/archive2

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFP.

DO NOT SUBMIT NEW VOTES TO THESE PAGES. To vote on these images, use PFP.

Weak against. This is HIILARIOUS when viewed much bigger than it will appear on the main page.--<<>> 20:33, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Cancel. Maybe back in 1995, where "lol microsoft errors" jokes were still occasionally funny... --Andrusi 22:25, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Comment: one of the error boxes says, "Our of screen space..." instead of OUT of screen space... otherwise pretty good job. I think it's too big to be front page material though. But then again it's obvious what is going on. -- – Mahrowwa.k.a.AAAAA A. AAAAAAAAA 22:49, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

for - even if you can't read everything, the image is a fun one. May I suggest changing the caption to something like "Windows XP is world-renowned for its stability and reliability."?--Wyattj 13:21, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Haha, one of them's an AAAAAAAAA! PURE GOLD! Also, I'm making this my new desktop background, to replace that flash-based cursor-following matrix. And, this reminds me of that time when my browser would crash every time I visited VFP. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 19:55, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

For. Although it may be a bit dated, there's at least two references to Uncyclopedia that are NOT blatantly obvious, and that had me laughing out loud. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:57, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

For! This is fantastic! AAAAAAAAAA! 21:37, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Mulehunter

After a short research I find it quite funny! but I keep my first impression

For those of us old (read: 20-something) people who grew up with Bob Ross will appreciate this.Tom Veil 20:09, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

For I fixed the lettering a bit so that it shows up better. Not sure why it showed up so dark before. Strong Rad 16:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Ya know, ol' Happy Trees was a 'Nam vet... I think that should be incorporated into the caption. (I always wanted to see him crack on the show and start mixing some Asian Yellow with Agent Orange) Conditional For. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:20, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Against: The Joy of Killing ought to relate to The Joy of Cooking somehow. Also, the image isn't very funny. --Sirgwax (talk) 21:32, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Having been reminded that in fact, the Joy of Painting is the reference, I retract my objections. I do think it could be made a slightly more obvious reference though (caption perhaps). --Sirgwax (talk) 20:15, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

??? Why? It relates to the Joy of Painting....Strong Rad 01:13, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

I reject your reality and substitute my own! Actually, I think you either get this one or you don't, and no amount of prompting for laughter will help. Strong Rad 12:50, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Mix some Pink-o Commie with Olive drab and you get a happy little For that's right, RadicalX is back bitches!--Sir SlackerboyaCUNVFH (talk) 15:27, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

For What the hell? You kids are clearly too young or foreign to understand this joke. It's extremely funny, and the article is even funnier than the image. The Joy of Cooking was a direct name rip off from The Joy of Painting, along with others. »BrigSirDawg | t | v | c» 07:06, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

FOR!! He shot a 78-year-old man in the face!! ANIDNMENOSCWICZ 15:31, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

This is the sort of event that needs to be comemorated. An enthusiastic FOR, and let's hope he doesn't have the sense to retract any support he gives to the NRA. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:42, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

for but you might resize and reshade a few things--Nappy The Quarryman 04:58, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

weak for Sloppy, stupid, topical but I still laughed my ass off--Count of Monkey Crisco 17:52, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

For. Image could be better, but the caption's great. Though "Gun, Dick, gun!" ought to be "Shoot, Dick, shoot!" I'm not even a hunter, but I know better than to lower the gun to horizon level when hunting quail.--[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 19:45, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

For - even better than the Lego Mohammed. --OsirisX 07:00, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

BLASPHEMY wtf... is that supposed to be a piccy of Mohammed?? This brings Uncyclopedia to a new low... how about this FUCK SOPH.... This entry was finished by the guy sitting next to him... he sits in a pile of ashes on the floor as he got struck by lighteningANIDNMENOSCWICZ 19:54, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

For, caption could still use improvement, but no ideas here... Anon32 14:38, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

For - but the article it's on needs expanding, and it might be funnier if at least one person (not necessarily Bush himself; maybe the guy in back?) was not wearing a furry mask. --Some user 16:13, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Against, until. What's with the wave of poorly done pictures? Make it look like the heads are actually attached to the bodies, then we'll see. --Boy Toybitch at me 16:32, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

For. What the heck. If no-one else cares, why should I? --Boy Toybitch at me 16:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

For. I like it, but WHAT THE HELL IS THAT GRAY THING AAAAAAAHHH GET IT OFF ME AAAAAAHHHH!!! (BTW, anyone else getting a strong Avengers: The Movie vibe from this?) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:46, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Dunno. "New for people with OCD:" maybe. I saw OCD in the header and got the joke. I just want OCD to be in the caption somehow. Doesn't need to be clever. --Rev. Isra(talk) 00:06, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

For, but I sra's right. I thought it was about condoms. Kakun 23:58, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Against. - Taken out of the context of the article, it makes little sense. There should be something in the caption about OCD. --Leo 02:53, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Against. - I was neither, for or against but now that it is the size of a house it must be stoppped. i dont want 2 stay on the fence --Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN3NotMBLK |_LG8+::: 09:38, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Against - too tiny to be fun on the front page Mtu 01:59, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

After so long! another picture I can hapily vote FOOOOR, with no doubts.--Rataube 02:25, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Against nothing clever about it at all, put him next to a boiling cooking pot (with the hand sticking out aka cooking monster)with a spoon and then it might be funny--Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN3NotMBLK |_LG8+::: 03:07, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Weak For After looking at the current bunch this would have 2 be the second best of the lot after the wiki versions --Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN3NotMBLK |_LG8+::: 00:21, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Mickeys

Featured I didn't even count the votes. Haha, suckers! --—rc(t) 03:55, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Self-nomination I made this a long time ago. Unfortunately the article it's on is pretty sparse and it could use a better caption, but what the hey, I'm feeling wild today. --—rc(t) 19:56, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

For. I, personally, like the bottom one, but I'm fine with either one. I think the caption should stay along the lines of the top one, though, about the printer running out of (color ink/ink). -JBob 06:48, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I'll vote for but not for the newest one. KATIE!! 10:10, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC) <-- That was an AGAINST IN SCREAMING BOLD CAPS!!! --KATIE!! 05:28, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

If I counted correctly, Mono Lisa had half a vote on Connectthedots when the latter was featured (For votes - Against votes), and as Dawg said (and as I said below), seniority on VFP gives a slight boost. And nobody can deny that Connectthedots had seniority in spades... --—rc(t) 08:48, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Against. Upon looking at it further, I think it needs to be a fixed up a bit; mainly the lighting, which makes it visually ambiguous as to whether it is a flat fruitcake or a bowl of soup. I still encourage a new caption, however. --Sir Volte KUNTalk (+SNSCMBur.VFPVFH) 22:43, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Against. Only works in context for me, less entertaining as a featured image. Now, if the article wins VFH, this would be a good featured article image. »BrigSirDawg | t | v | c» 23:55, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Against. I would have supported You are dyclextic.--Suresh 22:10, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For Not that I necessarily like the image (thought I don't necessarily don't either), but because I'm against the reasons against. --S P I N N I E 23:11, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Against Its a good image.. but jokes about deadly illnesses aren't funny. --ANIDNMENOSCWICZ 15:20, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Remark I feel needs to be made due to all the "don't laugh at leukemia" votes: WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA1. On the About page, you can find the following sentence:"Offense is exceptionally likely, expected, and to be renowned while reading the Uncyclopedia." Still in doubt? Read that excerpt again.Sincerely,~ sin($)tan(€) 16:19, 18 January 2006 (UTC)1(Tip of the day: You click blue underlined words or phrases to find out more.)

I am not saying the article should be changed or deleted, I am not even saying the article itself can't be featured (on this grounds). But I insist that puting this particular image in the FRONTPAGE is TOO MUCH. Wana keep argueing? go to the VFP discussion page.--Rataube 17:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Against. Because I'm nitpicking, I think it should be just one star, like the real Turkish flag. Strong Rad 18:43, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Comment. I agree with this. I am still keeping my for vote though, because either way it works just as well. Also, Pacman doesn't have any eyes in the game, but that's okay. --Sir Volte KUNTalk (+SNSCMBur.VFPVFH) 20:05, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Comment. But why have one half of a Pacman reference when you can have two halves of a Pacman reference? --Skyscraper 19:05, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

The real flag was done after Mr PacMan ate the other two stars. FOR. --Rataube 19:49, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

The Last Supper

Nomination and for. I had the last version of this pulled because the cropped version wasn't as good. Before anyone complains about re-nominations, the other nomination wasn't finished and it had a positive vote score, but I pulled it in favour of this one. Also, it is a fairly wide thumbnail (300px) but Rcmurphy has given me the green light to nominate it anyway. --Sir Volte KUNTalk (+SNSCMBur.VFPVFH) 23:52, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For I like this picture better without the caption, since the apostles are all like, "What the... where did Jesus go?" but I know you want to link it to the original article. It's still the good stuff.--Bradaphraser 00:03, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For I love how much sense this painting makes without Jesus. Doug 00:35, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Comment. It can be resized down to 275px (or 250px if absolutely necessary) without losing much, although I've tested it myself and the width of this one doesn't interfere any more than, say, the Truman Torch image did (it was 250px, and quite a lot taller). --Sir Volte KUNTalk (+SNSCMBur.VFPVFH) 17:13, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For. As much as I like the article, I think that this image could do with a better caption. Maybe something like: "Jesus making himself disappear at a routine birthday party gig." Just a thought. -JBob 06:24, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Comment. Yes, I think it could have worked with a "disappearing Jesus" themed caption, especially with the facial expressions. However, it should be tied to Nobody cares somehow, as that is what I made the image for. Since it's so far into the nomination, I will leave it as it is; changing the nominated item, even if it is just the caption, is not a good idea. Thanks for your input and vote though. --Sir Volte KUNTalk (+SNSCMBur.VFPVFH) 06:33, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)

FEATURE THIS! I have decided to throw my support behind this image. It's also one of the only images on this page, outside of RadX's latest, to have absolutely no votes against. »BrigSirDawg | t | v | c» 18:43, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For One of the only funny ones I've seen nominated. Neegore 12:35, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Harry S. Truman was the American President who ordered that the atomic bomb be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II. "Truman Torch" is a play on the Human Torch, a member of the famed comicbook team "The Fantastic Four." I proudly stand by my America-centric humor. ---Rev. Isra(talk) 17:54, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Funny picture, even if I don't get the in-joke. For. --Hinoa4 01:30, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. I just looked at the talk page for the first time since the day of, and Good God! Someone needs to write an article on Meta-Humor. --Isra1337 01:42, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Neutral until I'm added to the picture, then For - Out of pure vanity. That is a very funny picture from an in-joke standpoint. »BrigSirDawg | t | v | c» 07:27, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

You weren't involved in the conflict. And you should thank your lucky stars. I still get flashbacks when I see an mp3 player and a European flag in the same place *shudder*.--Carlos the Mean 08:33, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I was involved in the conflict before there was a conflict. I just wasn't involved in the Talk page portion. I was there when "feature!" was declared and I was the first (I think) WTF'er on IRC. Not involved... Pffft. »BrigSirDawg | t | v | c» 05:47, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Oh sorry, I was merely documenting what I saw, I'm not a reliable source as such - which makes my output perfect for the front page of Uncyclopedia! --Sir Carlos the MeanCUNVFPCSCMCUNT (talk) 05:59, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I personally like the part about breast tenderness. But the part that says "Pre-Menstrual Syndrome" should probably be changed. I agree with the bigger too. But I give this a For whether it's changed or not! --Katie loves you! 22:56, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Apple pie chart

For I like how the crumbs are left behind in the tin. --Mosquitopsu 17:08, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For I made this pic for the Delicious charts article, though i didn't nominate it myself. Cheers to who did. I also ate about 25% of it :p --Okochama 21:57, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For The picture simply and effectively provides me with a hilarious mental image of a board meeting where a guy who has just stuffed his face with 75% of pie is explaining its deliciousness quotient. --Quilty 01:52, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Against God that sucks, whoever wrote that article should be locked up in a small cage with a dozen 18 year old cheerleaders. And we have an edible Hitler image already. --—rc(t) 23:28, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

What isn't the joke? "I Can't Believe It's Not Butter" is a butter substitute and this is a play on it, with "Sweet Aryan Genetics" and "Naturally Socialism Free" and "100% Superior Breed". --Katie loves you! 23:05, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Jumbo Shrimp- A great book, and yes this is a vote for...when I read it thats what I thought it was about...you know Holden's brother has the baseball mit...And then I finished it and was like "Oh...", I really was. Yah, I was gonna make a picture like this...It woulda sucked though...so yah...Im Rambling...so yah Im voting for it, I really am...--BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 00:46, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Jealous? Absolutely. However, note that I didn't vote against the League of Extraordinary People image, which for me is like an affirmative vote. AND I voted for the U2 image, which for me is like six affirmative votes. ;) --—rc(t) 05:31, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)