Under a DACA amnesty, American taxpayers would be left with a $26 billion bill. About one in five DACA illegal aliens, after an amnesty, would end up on food stamps, while at least one in seven would go on Medicaid. Since DACA’s inception under Obama, more than 2,100 illegal aliens have been kicked off the program after it was revealed that they were either criminals or gang members. JOHN BINDER

Friday, March 31, 2017

High School Rapists
Entered U.S. as Unaccompanied Alien Children, Lived in Sanctuary CountyJudicial Watch Corruption Chronicles, March 24,
2017

Back in
the summer of 2014, when the first batch of UACs began arriving, Judicial Watch
reported that many were not harmless children fleeing violence as the media was
largely reporting. Border Patrol sources on the ground divulged that a lot of
the Central Americans were in their late teens and had ties to violent gang
members and other criminal elements. Federal authorities handling the crisis
offered a vastly different depiction than the government’s official version in
the media. From the start, the barrage of illegal alien minors created an
out-of-control disaster with jam-packed holding centers, rampant diseases and
sexually active teenagers at a Nogales facility that housed the first arrivals,
Homeland Security sources told Judicial Watch.

A few weeks after the barrage of UACs slammed
border officials, Homeland Security sources told Judicial Watch that the
nation’s most violent street gangs—including Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13)—were
actively recruiting new members at shelters housing illegal immigrant minors.
In many cases they used Red Cross phones to communicate. The 18th Street gang
also went on a recruiting frenzy at the various facilities housing the UACs,
sources confirmed. The MS-13 is a feared street gang of mostly Central American
illegal immigrants that’s spread throughout the U.S. and is renowned for drug
distribution, murder, rape, robbery, home invasions, kidnappings, vandalism and
other violent crimes. The Justice Department’s National Gang Intelligence
Center (NGIC) says criminal street gangs like the MS-13 are responsible for the
majority of violent crimes in the U.S. and are the primary distributors of most
illicit drugs. The 18th Street gang is considered the largest organized gang in
Los Angeles County with about 15,000 members that operate a number of criminal
enterprises throughout the region.http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2017/03/high-school-rapists-entered-u-s-unaccompanied-alien-children-lived-sanctuary-county/

HOW
TO DESTROY AMERICA:

THE
OBAMA DOCTRINE OF UNLEASHING MEXICAN CRIMINALS ACROSS AMERICA FROM BORDER to
OPEN BORDER

The Justice Department’s National Gang Intelligence Center
(NGIC) claims that Latino street gangs like the MS-13 are responsible for the
majority of violent crimes in the U.S. and are the primary distributors of most
illicit drugs.

OPEN BORDERS: The Democrat Party’s Weapon of Mass Destruction on the
American Worker

SABOTAGE of HOMELAND SECURITY: BARACK OBAMA PARTNERS WITH
MEXICO’S DRUG CARTELS TO BRING DOWN THE U.S. MIDDLE-CLASS

As soon
as the UACs started arriving, Homeland Security sources told Judicial Watch
that many had ties to gang members in the U.S. In fact, JW reported last July
that street gangs—including Mara Salvatrucha or MS-13—went on a recruiting
frenzy at U.S. shelters housing the illegal immigrant minors and they were
using Red Cross phones to communicate.

The MS-13
is a feared street gang of mostly Central American illegal immigrants that’s
spread throughout the U.S. and is renowned for drug distribution, murder, rape,
robbery, home invasions, kidnappings, vandalism and other violent crimes. The
Justice Department’s National Gang Intelligence Center (NGIC) says criminal
street gangs like the MS-13 are responsible for the majority of violent crimes
in the U.S. and are the primary distributors of most illicit drugs.

OBAMA and the MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS SERVE UP HEROIN TO THE
AMERICAN MIDDLE-CLASS.

The Justice Department’s National Gang Intelligence Center
(NGIC) claims that Latino street gangs like the MS-13 are responsible for the
majority of violent crimes in the U.S. and are the primary distributors of most
illicit drugs.

GRAPHIC IMAGES of America coming
under Mex Occupation

The NARCOMEX drug cartels now
operate in all major American cities and haul back to NARCOMEX between $40 top
$60 BILLION from sales of HEROIN!

“While
the Obama Administration downplays violence along the U.S.-Mexico border,
authorities in Texas reveal that Mexican have transformed parts of the state
into a war zone where shootings, beheadings, kidnappings and murders are
common.

In
California, illegals can vote: it’s possible and very likely. California’s
automatic motor-voter law all but assures that illegals seeking driver’s
licenses will get a ballot along with their license.

Miscreants
from any corner of the world can register to vote in California online, too. No
vetting, no assurance, no integrity.

Voter
fraud in broken inner city hellholes like Detroit and New York City cannot
compare with the ballot stuffing throughout the once Golden State.

THE LA RAZA PLAN: California’s final surrender
to fly the Mexican flag within 4 years.

"The American Southwest seems to be slowly
returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single
shot." -- - EXCELSIOR --- national newspaper of Mexico

Second, where is the governor of California calling on AMLO to
stop it and go home? More to the point, is California so far gone
that no one objects to a foreigner criticizing a U.S. president on our soil?

BILLIONAIRES FOR BORDERLESS AMERICA

….It’s all to keep wages DEPRESSED.

“This nation no longer is a democratic
republic...rather it has become a tool of the super-rich members of the above
mentioned elite who preselect our presidents based on their cooperation and
complicity with the elite’s ultimate goals. Obama has, in their opinion done
superbly carrying out the plans well laid out for him by his backers.”

As
economist Philip J. Romero concluded in a 2007 study, "illegal immigrants
impose a 'tax' on legal California residents in the tens of billions of
dollars."

Californiamust stem the flow
of illegal immigrants

The state should go after
employers who hire them, curb taxpayer-funded benefits, deploy the National
Guard to help the feds at the border and penalize 'sanctuary' cities.

“Illegal
immigration is another matter entirely. With the state budget in tatters,
millions of residents out of work and a state prison system strained by massive
overcrowding, California simply cannot continue to ignore the strain that
illegal immigration puts on our budget and economy. Illegal aliens cost taxpayers
in our state billions of dollars each year.As
economist Philip J. Romero concluded in a 2007 study, "illegal immigrants
impose a 'tax' on legal California residents in the tens of billions of
dollars."

In
California, illegals can vote: it’s possible and very likely. California’s
automatic motor-voter law all but assures that illegals seeking driver’s
licenses will get a ballot along with their license.

Miscreants
from any corner of the world can register to vote in California online, too. No
vetting, no assurance, no integrity.

Voter
fraud in broken inner city hellholes like Detroit and New York City cannot
compare with the ballot stuffing throughout the once Golden State.

The highest taxed state in the nation is about to pay more in taxes as California Governor Jerry Brown won agreement from Democrat leaders to push through a long-overdue transportation bill funded by raising gas taxes and Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) usage fees.

At a joint press conference at the Capitol Wednesday, theSacramento Beereports that Gov. Brown acknowledged California’s roads are pothole-ridden and crumbling, committing to push a “$5.2 billion road-funding package” through both houses of the legislature, which will be a tough sell for some moderate Democrats in swing districts.

Brown’s proposal would hike the state’s gas tax and set up a “user fee” based on a sliding scale tied to a vehicle’s value.

TheLos Angeles Timesis reporting that the proposal includes “a 12-cent-per-gallon increase in current gas excise taxes on Nov. 1. Future increases would be made through a new tax calculating methodology and annual inflation adjustments. Those changes would begin in 2019 and would be fully implemented in 2020.”

These taxes would be on top of the increased vehicle use fee, which the Timesstates would “average $51.00 per year based on the value of the car.”

The sliding scale fee for the right to drive on California’s roads starts at $25 for cars valued under $5,000, and rises to $175 for vehicles whose value exceeds $60,000. All electric vehicle owners will be billed $100 — a huge opt-out for those who pay zero gas taxes while driving very expensive cars.

Brown’s plan also includes money to expand public transit, which is sure to be unpopular when the roads are in such a poor state of repair.

The Times adds that Gov. Brown is pushing the plan as a “pay-as-you-go proposal,” but most Californians are going to ask why so much money has been wasted on priorities that have nothing to do with the “public good” – -like free college tuition for illegal aliens; huge pay and pension increases for public sector unions; and politicians’ pet projects like the High-Speed Rail Authority.

One bit of irony: Brown’s transportation proposal includes a constitutional amendment to guarantee that the legislature does not divert the transportation funds to any other purpose — even though those safeguards already exist. (They have been suspended many times.)

The San Diego Union-Tribunereports that “In 2002, voters overwhelmingly passed Proposition 42, a constitutional amendment meant to ensure that motor vehicle sales taxes be used only for transportation purposes … After such suspensions happened twice, in 2006, voters by an even bigger margin approved Proposition 1A” — another constitutional amendment that forces the legislature to repay any funds diverted during a “state financial hardship” as a loan to the transportation fund.

The irony is that the Democrats are promising to protect taxpayers from … Democrats, i.e. from themselves.

Democrat leaders have given themselves an April 6 deadline to pass the proposal, to be certain they have ample time to have the package approved ahead of the June 15 budget deadline.

What they may not be thinking about is the political impact of proposing a huge tax increase that will hit the working poor the hardest — the dreaded gas tax — just before the April 15 tax deadline.

If Republicans hold the line, every Democrat will have to vote in favor of what is sure to a very unpopular tax. When former Governor Gray Davis tripled the “car tax” (aka ‘vehicle license fee’) 14 years ago, he was ousted by a recall election, and replaced with Arnold Schwartzenegger — who worked with the Democrat-controlled legislature to rescind the unpopular increase.

Ever since the Oroville Dam became the symbol ofGov. Jerry Brown’s failureto take care of a basic core duty of state government— that is, maintaining and expanding infrastructure for the common good — Californians have been asking what happened to the(Proposition 1) Water Bond money; why the state can give illegal aliens a free ride to college, but can’t fix potholes ; and why infrastructure money was spent on pet projects like the California High-Speed Rail Authority.

Meanwhile, the California media are treating the suggestion that Brown hasn’t ruled outrunning for president in 2020 — when he would be 82 — as newsworthy.

EYE ON THE NEWS

Pothole Coast Highway

With its dams and roads crumbling, California faces an infrastructure crisis.

The Pacific Coast Highway stretch between Dana Point in Orange County, Calif., at the southern end, and Fort Bragg in Mendocino on the northern end, “is a bucket-list trip,” the New York Daily News enthused two years ago. “Stretching 650 curve-hugging, jaw-dropping miles along the ruggedly beautiful central coast of California, Highway 1 is one of the most scenic roads in the country.”

What the newspaper didn’t mention is that anyone winding along California roads might think that the Big One has already hit. Streets and highways across the state are in awful shape: a cracked, crumbling mess pock-marked with potholes, which tend to grow larger due to time, weather, and government negligence.

Some potholes grew so monstrous after recent heavy winter rains that California Highway Patrol officers in Oakland actually named one— “Steve.” They should have called it “Jerry,” after Governor Brown, who has done little about the state’s failing infrastructure except talk about it, while continuing to seek funding for a costly and unnecessary high-speed rail system. A bit of help for the weary motorist who’s thinking about making a justifiable claim against Caltrans for the damage it’s done to his car? Not in Brown’s California. Chapman University professor and City Journal contributing editor Joel Kotkin wrote last year in the Orange County Register that Brown’s goal “is to make congestion so terrible that people will be forced out of their cars and onto transit.”

Not all of California’s infrastructure problems can be blamed on the winter weather. In 2015, in the midst of a withering drought, the Mercury News reported that a family’s car hit a “killer pothole” near Sacramento with such force that its airbags inflated. Repairs would have cost nearly $15,000, so the insurance company wrote if off as a total loss. Though that might sound like a one-off event, California roads are indeed wrecking cars. “Deficient roads” in the Los Angeles area cost motorists an average $2,800 in annual repair costs. The state implicitly admits that its roads are a mess through a law that enables car owners who feel they’ve “lost money or property as a result of any action or inaction by Caltrans” to make five-figure claims against the agency.

The Reason Foundation, which for decades has rated road conditions across the country, ranked California roads 42nd in the nation in its 22nd Annual Highway Report. The state is 45th in rural-interstate pavement condition, 48th in urban-interstate pavement condition, and 48th in congestion in urbanized areas, the study says. “Half of the nation’s rural interstate mileage in poor condition is located in just five states,” says Reason’s Adrian Moore, and California is one of them. Media reports say that nearly 60 percent of the roads need repair. Will Kempton, a former Caltrans director, told the Los Angeles Times in February that road conditions were the worst he’d ever seen.

Roads aren’t the only infrastructure breaking down in California; its dams are no longer trustworthy. The Oroville Dam in the Sierra Nevada foothills almost failed this winter when its main spillway fell apart. It didn’t, but its near-collapse was a warning, as the New York Times reported, that the state’s “network of dams and waterways is suffering from age and stress.” The San Francisco Chronicle said a year ago that “there are 200 dams in California that are at least partially filled with mud and are approaching the end of their working lives.”

This isn’t a surprise to policymakers, who’ve been on notice for some time. According to the Association of Dam Safety Officials, California had 334 “high-hazard potential” dams in 2005; by 2015, 678 earned that designation. Officials were told in 2005 that the emergency spillway at the Oroville Dam posed a serious risk.

Also vulnerable are the state’s levees, especially those in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta network. Problems in this patchwork of largely muddy banks, built by farmers rather than civil engineers, put much of the state’s water supply at grave risk.

Rather than fix the state’s vital artery system and shore up its dams and levees, Brown and other policymakers prefer to focus on the shiny bauble of high-speed rail and a fanciful mixture of mass transit and bike lanes in an effort to move Californians out of their cars and into forms of transportation favored by Sacramento’s political bosses. Those who resist the agenda because they want to maintain the freedom facilitated by cars are likely to be hit with a new fuel-tax hike (in a state that already has some of the highest fuel taxes in the country).

More taxes, tolls, or user fees might be tolerable if the additional dollars improved the roads. But California has a history of taxing motorists to pay for pet projects that have zero connection with improved street and highway conditions. The Golden State’s existing patterns of density and sprawl have made reliance on car travel a necessity for most residents. Mass-transit advocates can wish for magical people-moving networks that will make cars obsolete, but the state’s planners need to focus on repairing the infrastructure we already have before they start implementing their dreams of a shining California future.

Kerry Jackson is the Pacific Research Institute’s fellow in California studies. Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

"This is a wall of shame and we don't want any part of it," Assemblyman Phil Ting, D-San Francisco, said in a statement. "Immigrant stories are the history of America and this is a nightmare."

The announcement of the proposal came on Monday, three days after the U.S. Customs and Border Protection requested proposals for "border wall prototypes."

Assembly Bill 946 would require the California Public Employee Retirement System and the California State Teachers Retirement System – the two largest public pension funds in the nation, with investments of $312 billion and $202 billion, respectively – to liquidate investments in any company involved with the wall's construction within a year. It would also require the pension-fund management to report a list of those companies to the Legislature.

Messages to state GOP lawmakers seeking comment were not returned Monday afternoon.

The proposal will be carried by Ting and Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, D-San Diego, and Eduardo Garcia, D-Coachella.

If the bill passes, it will discourage California contractors from bidding on wall construction. That means a loss of hundreds of jobs – many of which would go to both immigrants and illegal aliens. Instead, those companies involved in successful bidding on the wall could bring in workers from other states.

It takes a special kind of idiot to become so slavishly devoted to a political agenda that a politician would harm his own constituents.

The legislation has a good chance of passing, considering the massive advantage in the state legislature by Democrats. What would be California's loss could easily become another state's gain as Golden State politicians look to punish their state because someone in Washington is finally trying to address the problem of massive illegal immigration.

In 24 States, 50% or More of Babies Born on Medicaid; New Mexico Leads Nation With 72%

New Mexico led all states with 72 percent of the babies born there in 2015 having their births covered by Medicaid.

Arkansas ranked second with 67%; Louisiana ranked third with 65 percent; and three states—Mississippi, Nevada and Wisconsin—tied for fourth place with 64 percent of babies born there covered by Medicaid.

New Hampshire earned the distinction of having the smallest percentage of babies born on Medicaid. In that state, Medicaid paid for the births of only 27 percent of the babies born in 2015.

Virginia and Utah tied for the next to last position, with 31 percent of the babies born on Medicaid.

However, according to KFF, some of the nation’s most populous states shared the distinction of having 50 percent or more of the babies born there born on Medicaid.

In California, Florida and Illinois, for example, 50 percent of all babies were born on Medicaid in the latest year on record.

In New York, 51 percent of the babies were born on Medicaid.

In Ohio, 52 percent of babies were born on Medicaid.

The Kaiser Family Foundation gathered its data on the number of babies born on Medicaid in each state by surveying the state Medicaid directors.

“Medicaid directors were asked to provide the most recent available data on the share of all births in their states that were financed by Medicaid,” said a KFF report[3].

“About half of the states were able to provide data for calendar 2015 or fiscal year 2015,” said KFF. “Other states generally provided data from 2013 or 2014. On average, states reported that Medicaid pays for just over 47 percent of all births.”

“Eight states (Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina and West Virginia) reported that Medicaid pays for 60 percent or more of all births in their state,” reported KFF.

The KFF survey said data from Hawaii was not available.

A study published by the journal “Women’s Health Issues”[4] in 2013 looked at births covered by Medicaid in the years 2008, 2009, 2010. The report said it was trying to establish a “baseline” for Medicaid-covered birth before the Affordable Care Act’s—AKA Obamacare’s—expansion of Medicaid kicked in.

“Starting in 2014,” said this report, “some states will extend Medicaid to thousands of previously uninsured, low-income women. Given this changing landscape, it is important to have a baseline of current levels of Medicaid financing for births in each state.”

That study, done by researchers at George Washington University and the March of Dimes, determined that in 2008, 40.08 percent of the births in the United States were covered by Medicaid; and that, in 2009, 43.89 percent were covered by Medicaid.

By 2010, according this report, the percentage of births in the United States covered by Medicaid had risen to 47.75 percent—or 1,805,151 out of 3,780,519 total births.

Another report, published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention[5] later in December 2013, looked at the form of payment for births in the 33 states and the District of Columbia that as of 2010 had adopted the 2003 version of “U.S. Standard Certificate for Live Birth.” This certificate specifically asks the mother to say which of four categories the payment for her child’s birth falls into: private insurance, Medicaid, self-pay, or other.

This data, according to the CDC, covered all 2010 births in the 33 states and the District of Columbia, which accounted for 76 percent of all births in the nation in that year. According to the CDC, this data revealed that 44.9 percent of the babies born in these jurisdictions in 2010 were born on Medicaid.

In this 2010 CDC data for 33 states, New Mexico also led with the highest percentage of births on Medicaid—with 57.5 percent of all babies born there that year having their births covered by Medicaid.

In California, Florida and Illinois, for example, 50 percent of all babies were born on Medicaid in the latest year on record.

In California, illegals can vote: it’s possible and very likely. California’s automatic motor-voter law all but assures that illegals seeking driver’s licenses will get a ballot along with their license.

Miscreants from any corner of the world can register to vote in California online, too. No vetting, no assurance, no integrity.

Voter fraud in broken inner city hellholes like Detroit and New York City cannot compare with the ballot stuffing throughout the once Golden State.

“The lifetime costs of Social Security and Medicare benefits of illegal immigrant beneficiaries of President Obama’s executive amnesty would be well over a trillion dollars, according to Heritage Foundation expert Robert Rector’s prepared testimony for a House panel obtained in advance by Breitbart News.”

MEXICO’S CITY of SANTA ANA, in the ORANGE COUNTY, California should secede and join Mexico.

Second, where is the governor of California calling on AMLO to
stop it and go home? More to the point, is California so far gone
that no one objects to a foreigner criticizing a U.S. president on our soil?

*

(TOP – CHATA, BORDER VIOLENCE, CARTELS, OBAMA,)

BILLIONAIRES FOR BORDERLESS AMERICA

….It’s all to keep wages DEPRESSED.

“This nation no longer is a democratic
republic...rather it has become a tool of the super-rich members of the above
mentioned elite who preselect our presidents based on their cooperation and
complicity with the elite’s ultimate goals. Obama has, in their opinion done
superbly carrying out the plans well laid out for him by his backers.”

While the declining job market in the United States may be
discouraging some would-be border crossers, a flow of illegal aliens continues unabated,
with many entering the United States as drug-smuggling “mules.”