82 comments:

But unlike a super PAC, the new nonprofit will be able to accept anonymous contributions. The nonprofit could voluntarily choose to release the names of donors — but such disclosure is not mandated by the Internal Revenue Service or the Federal Election Commission. There are no contribution caps on what donors are allowed to give to 501(c)4 groups.

Obama bypasses Congress, attempts to force companies to reveal political donations through SEC

oh boy this would really piss off anita hill who by the way is now at brandeis which is no podunk place they just sell all their art for money and she is a senior assistant to the provost it did not work out for her in oklahoma poor lady its her home state but she left all that behind when she got involved in a national political issue and her 13 siblings where are they now oklahoma? what a sad story all around the hatred and the manipulation and the desperation and the tainting of two lives they both lost but so did the nation and the race and if obama is an organ of change is michelle an organ grinder why can't we all just get along.

I think after Obama gets out of office in 2017 he'll probably start a non-for-profit community based organizing action support group organization for supporting causes and candidates for communities that organize minority urban youth causes.

Just imagine the actual accomplishments, the buildings, the businesses, the art, the music, that these people would make if they bent their will to creation rather than this solipsistic mendacious make-work masturbatory "organizing" lie.

Pogo said...Just imagine the actual accomplishments, the buildings, the businesses, the art, the music, that these people would make if they bent their will to creation rather than this solipsistic mendacious make-work masturbatory "organizing" lie.

That're doing this crap because they don't have the ability to do anything constructive.

"But unlike a super PAC, the new nonprofit will be able to accept anonymous contributions. The nonprofit could voluntarily choose to release the names of donors — but such disclosure is not mandated by the Internal Revenue Service or the Federal Election Commission. There are no contribution caps on what donors are allowed to give to 501(c)4 groups."

What color t-shirt? Brown, of course. Now visualize that with a red handkerchief. But not a regular handkerchief like the old days but the hipster scarf, extra long red scarf triple wrapped over a brown t-shirt. Because everybody knows what a t-shirt needs most is a hipster triple-wrapped scarf. The alternate hipster community organizer costume is a parka / scarf, knitted hat, hiking boots, short pants.

Get ready for the drums of righteousness and the chants of rage to fill the winter air in Madison, as the Seventh Circuit has upheld Act 10 in its entirety today. One of the three judges dissented on one part of the opinion (prohibiting dues deduction from payroll for only some public employee unions), but otherwise this was a clean sweep for Walker.

Gonna have to activate the organgrinders to play "Stand . . .With Gov-er-nor Walker!"

Gun control advocates do not actually mean they want to get rid of guns. Logically, they would require men with guns to go get the guns from people they don't want to have them. Thus, gun control isn't about banning guns. It's about banning guns from everyone except the military and police.

Yeah, why not? If you were dumb enough to vote for this worthless community organizing piece of shit in the first place, he figures you're still dumb enough to fall for it over and over and over again. Remember, he was re-elected, so he knows for sure that people will buy his bullshit. Who'se the fool? Certainly not him.

Organizing for what? It's an emotionally appealing marketing scheme; but, their actions have already exposed the nature of their campaign. It is not in the interest of America or Americans; other than for those minority interests who dream of exploiting us to advance their political, economic, and social standing. It is a regressive renaissance.

DADvocate said... Finally, Obama's experience as a community organizer comes into use.

What do you mean finally?

A community organizer determines the community's needs and then manipulates them with claims his chosen scapegoats are keeping them from achieving those needs. And this has been Obama's campaign strategy every minute of every campaign he's ever run.

Calling out his opponents, being in constant campaign mode, being 'moderate' and playing the press as though he's got a bullhorn in his hand, playing all the volunteers and young people and playing the social media angle, all this comes from the organizer's playbook.

What has he done for young people in terms of jobs and the economy? Is he making us any safer with the rise of Islamism? Has he helped black people (aside from the inclusion into moral concern which any black president would have done)?

He divides and conquers. He rabble-rouses and takes advantage of the moment and the opposition.

I instantly thought of Psychotic Reaction. I can't link to it because I'm using my iPad, but it plays nicely in my head. Poor Obama just can't seem to get satisfaction as president, he's just tuned too heavily into the community organ izer.

Community organizers are just lobbyists, but ones who first cobble together the "interest group" that justifies their lobbying (and paycheck, and a status that most people think of as more respectable than the whore of the more accurately named lobbyist).

Two years ago out of curiosity I read one of the posts listing multiple jobs, sent out to grad students by our university's career services department. This place considers itself the cock-o'-the-walk: the Future is Yours with our little piece of credentialing paper --- so these solicitations for applicants should be for the cream of the crop jobs, right? Ha ha, joke's on you. Every single job on that list was for a lobbyist. Surprised, I continued to read these postings all that spring, but the situation never changed. The positions weren't always called lobbyist, but the job descriptions all involved working to "influence" legislation favorable to the group doing the hiring.

So this is the sector of our economy that's growing, it's where the jobs are. And all you kids with your fancy degrees, this is your future: go suck cock in DC. But try not to feel bad about what you're wasting your one-and-only life, and that great brain of yours, doing. No no, don't think about it.

When you spend your life as a community antagonizer, you lose tone in those empathy muscles, while you build up the "blame pipes" to epic proportions.

More succinctly, your job is to inflict pain, not feel it. First, you wish to turn up the heat on the "victim's" pain so that they are ready to lash out, in full adrenal fury.

Then, you want ot herd them into a pack, so that you can lead them to inflict pain on the "oppressors." Either direction, you, as the community antagonizer, want to inflict more pain. Over and over and over again.

You are selling pain. You are marketing pain. You are pain enhancing. So, please don't misread the lips..."I fuel your pain" is NOT "I feel your pain."

A conservative will fix your flat, a libertarian will offer you his AAA card, a liberal will form a committee to investigate the tire company, a leftist will drop the tire iron on your kneecap and tell you that you are lucky to have "free" healthcare, someone will be in touch with you for in-patient surgery in 18 months.

So now we fully understand the class warfare, the push (or non-push) on guns, taxes on the "rich", why we talk about Benghazi, and why Obama basically refuses to negotiate. It's a money making ploy. It's a massive, victimized community organization with life-time income for Michelle and Barrack and friends and family. Actually, it's genius. He doesn't have to be a good president at all. All he has to do is be the victim-in-chief. And then unite all the victims into on community and generate massive leverage. At what point did this guy look way past the presidency and see this huge opportunity? And he's going to use the office of president to create it. This is no small thing if it works.

Think about this from a community organizing perspective. Tragic events (Travon Martin, Hurricane Katrina, Sandy, etc.) are all useful to community organizers in uniting people. Like class-action lawsuits without the class. I think it's genius, if it works.

Al Gore made a couple hundred million dollars via rent seeking activities. Obama will make him look like a piker when he transitions from the presidency to the head of this organization where he will likely make hundreds of millions a year, in addition to rent seeking activities.

50 million people giving $100/year is $5 billion a year. Giving the sainted CEO a 5% management fee comes to $250 million per year.