Well, the trailer just came out. It’s really cool. I still don’t know what to make of this movie. The Sun has shut down, and we send a spaceship to restart it. Yeah, sounds like "The Core". But what I have seen makes this movie look more introspective and philosophical, which would be very interesting, i think. I guess we’ll find out soon enough!

A grand idea ABR! But hopefully a far better movie then the dreadful Fantastic 4 (how did that film rate a sequel again?). The trailer is really pretty intense and it has a good director. Will it be a good movie? Hopefully. Will it make up it’s science as it goes along? Hopefully not. If it can be a good movie WITH good science (Contact anyone?) that’ll be a real treat. And I’m sure Phil will review it for us with an eye for that, won’t you Phil?

Oh sweet merciful Einstein’s ghost, the Core was a bad movie! Bad, bad, oh so bad that I lost a good portion of my brain cells related to processing movie continuity and logic. I liked 28 days later, though, so if the same person behind that little gem is behind “Sunshine” then I think I can really get into this movie. Any movie with a significant amount of fire and nuclear explosions is, at the very least, mildly entertaining (at least that’s what I thought when I heard the premise for the Core – I’ve never been more wrong about a movie premise’s entertainment value). Anyway, looks cool!

The movie looks rather interesting. From reading the plot on Wikipedia it almost sounds like a cross between the main plot of The Core and the ending of Mission to Mars. Hopefully it won’t suck like those two movies.

I’m afraid I have misgivings about this film already. In just 50 years we’ll have the technology to ‘re-ignite’ the sun? That’s the level of development of a type 2 civilisation, and we’re barely type 1! I predict this will have more scientific misconceptions than Armageddon, it wouldn’t surprise me if the crew fly to the sun during the night so they won’t get fried! I do hope I’m wrong…

Ohh, Jesus…. [- sorry about that, but otherwise I would say some profanity ]
This is a BIG challenger for nomination for the prize of the less connected with the reality film. (Yes Armageddon, you have a contender)
I really am going to stop this comment at this point, all that is coming to my mind right now is how this is gonna be WRONG and have BAD astronomy.

(Ok only as a comment of a comment, I am not a native speaker of English, so sorry if you see some typos here, and, I never gonna be tired of this, THANKS FOR THE AWESOMELY WONDERFUL BLOG)

I had a nightmare like this last year. In the dream, I was out in my yard in the late afternoon, and the sky got sort of oddly colored and twinkly. It’s difficult to describe now. There were weird partial rainbows all over the place.

Then it got really dark out, and the sun was just an orange ball in the sky that you could stare right at with no problem. I walked out to the front of the house and people up and down the street were rushing into their cars and taking off, or just running away. In the dream I thought, “Where do they think they’re going?”

As the enormity of what was happening hit me, I woke up sweating. For sure one of those “thank goodness it was a dream” moments.

I agree with Quiet Desperation. The trailer looks terribly uninspired. Danny Boyle’s genius notwithstanding, this movie better produce some real (as opposed to fantasy) new physics because there is no way I can suspend disbelief given our current understanding of stellar dynamics.

There is another movie titled ‘Sunshine’ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0145503/ which follows a Hungarian Jewish family through the horrors of the 20th century. While not a great movie, it depicts events honestly, and has Ralph Fiennes star in multiple roles.

The Core was hilarious! Come on, what’s wrong with you people? It’s truly one of the best comedies I’ve ever seen.

As for Sunshine, though… I’d like to say I have faith in Danny Boyle, but if anything having a quality filmmaker on board is going to make the premise all the more painful.

I enjoyed The Core because it was an awful movie that knew it was awful and just didn’t care all that much. I’m not sure I can stomach the same ridiculous premise in a film that intends to actually be good.

Wow, lots of people taking the premise movie a little too seriously. C’mon all, suspend a little disbeleif for a couple of hours, chow some bad popcorn and enjoy yourselves. Or at least try. The premise might be a little outrageous (how the hell WOULD you re-ignite a star), but if it’s well put together, exciting, and the science isn’t laughable it could be good. It’s relatively rare for a film maker of this pedigree to even attempt sci-fi, so if the science isn’t utterly laughable (Armageddon anyone?), give it a shot.

Had a look at the ‘standard’ video as provided in the blog, but it was un-inspiring, and seemed to be somewhat jerky and with too many pauses in it to be useful. Was not impressed, and the premise of the story, whoever came up with that?

So I read the comments, and was not surprised.

But then I did what is in-explicable. I downloaded the HD version, as recommended by Caesar at 9:45pm, and was faced with three size choices – I selected the 38Mb version (others were 84 and 134Mb), and was prepared to wait a while while it loaded. Took about 30 seconds I reckon, and stretching the screen to the full entent, viewed the trailer again and saw much, much more than on the piddly little version in lo def, with no way to enlarge it. (Not that it would be any use as the thing would pixellate and jerk even more!)

I am almost game to d/l the 134Mb one, as these are in Quicktime, I should be suitably impressed.

So I have a better appreciation of the trailer at least, and I would enjoy the movie when it comes out, especially for the effects, even if I have to suspend my scientific sensibilities (hopefully). Still, it’s a silly plot.

Well, this is just an off-the-wall side comment and no big deal – but I wish someone with talent and money (and great sets) would remake into a movie Philip Wylie’s “When Worlds Collide” – especially combined with the follow-up “After Worlds Collide”. Though fantastical, it seems more suspension-of-disbelief-plausible.

You know, I thought about When Worlds Collide yesterday while I typed my first comment about Sunshine, and realized that I’ve been glad all these years that nobody HAS remade it, because of the implausibility of the whole thing.
Now, though, I’ll bet the floodgates are open and it’s only a matter of time before we see it happen. I’ll bet they were just waiting for the hubbub of Deep Impact & Armageddon to die down before doing another ‘collision’ themed disaster film.
Chip’s right, though… colliding worlds seems more suspension-of-disbelief plausible than re-igniting the sun.

Flak said, “Flak Says: “Câ€™mon all, suspend a little disbeleif for a couple of hours, chow some bad popcorn and enjoy yourselves. Or at least try.”

Because there’s limits. If two cops on CSI jump into a police car, and the police cars flys across the city through the air with no explanation, that breaks the limits assuming it isn’t some fantasy Blade Runner sequence.

I consider myself pretty open minded when it comes to fiction. For example, I’m a hard core skeptic who really likes the show Medium, and my major crush on Patricia Arquette has *nothing* to do with it. Honest. I’m the local Mr. Science Guy, but I read a lot of fantasy along with my SF.

But why watch a bad movie with bad popcorn when I can see a good movie with good popcorn? There’s enough choices out there, or in my own home theater, so that I don’t have to watch crap.

There’s also the consideration that if people keep going to see bad movies, Hollywood will continue to make bad movies. If it’s really “so bad you have to see it” then at least wait until it shows up on television and won’t register as a ticket sale or rental.

Seeing as how we’re all science geeks here and there is a strong realtionship between science geekery and enjoyment of science fiction I figured I’d post it.
It is a quite enjoyable short story about the sun going out… the author is a fellow by the name of Sam Hughes – and not a bad writer of sci-fi shortstories.

Q-D, I apologize, perhaps my point was not made well. I’m only saying that many posting here are trashing a movie they know very little about beyond it’s premise and it’s pedigree. It may indeed be the worst movie since the inception of the motion picture, but we don’t know that yet. There’s no reviews, no one’s seen it, so we’re all to a point in the dark. But it’s got good people behind it, so it deserves some deference. Trust me, if Micheal Bay were behind this I’d be more then willing to laugh at it. And I’d like to give you kudos, your point about Medium is excellent! There is a TV show who’s premise is preposterous to the science minded skeptic, yet it’s a good show. Well written, acted, and directed. Perhaps ‘Sunshine’ will be the same way, perhaps not, but let it have its shot.

Ooooh, big tanks of Wizard charcoal lighter fluid…that must be what that guy’s drowning in! And the “Promethius” ship name. Dude, how did they think of that!

There are so many trilling science based stories to tell, why do sci-fi movies these days have to be based on a clueless premise? It can’t all be the fault of clueless audiences. It has something to do with the unseen asphixiation of the market.

The amusing thing about the music is that – while I think it’s the remixed version from Requiem for a Dream, which was nicked by the Lord of the Rings trailers – the original song is Mozart’s Lux Aeterna – “eternal light”.

Hey Phil! I tried commenting the other day, but it seems it was eaten en route.

Yes, the premise *does* sound outrageous. Trust me when I say that the ‘mission to the Sun’ is to Sunshine what the ‘briefcase’ is to Pulp Fiction… It’s not like The Core (during which even my 10 year old son said ‘Wait! That’s not possible, is it?!’). It’s not like Event Horizon. It’s not a “disaster movie”. Don’t let the marketing people fool you…

The filmmakers (Alex Garland and Dany Boyle) want to use the film as a way to talk about science. They hired Brian Cox from CERN (my husband, actually) as science advisor. Brian admittedly had quite a time working out an explanation for why the Sun could be “dimming”. This is what he came up with.

The filmmakers are taking Brian around the world with them when they do press for the film so that he can talk to the world’s *film media* about science and CERN… which is no bad thing…

Both the filmmakers and the actors were so inspired and excited by their pre-filming scientific ‘education’ that one of the actors, Cillian Murphy (28 Days Later, Batman Begins, The Wind That Shakes the Barley) gave a talk at the Royal Society saying that he believes the work being done at CERN is ‘truly an heroic pursuit’.

Reading the blog explaination, it seems like a pretty well-thought-out if implausible premise. I mean, it’s the sort of thing Arthur C. Clarke got up to in a lot of his short stories. Of course it’s the MacGuffin rather than a serious plot point so they get away with more in accuracy than, say, a Michael Crichton novel where the science represented is one of the themes.

Thanks, Gia, for enlightening us a bit better than the trailer did, without giving anything away. Now it sounds a little more believable… or less unbelievable… well, it sounds interesting. If the actors can get that excited about it, for the reasons you cited, it sounds at least worth a viewing!

In my opinion, it’s not the average “science fiction” movie … I think that – in a way and maybe taking a lot of liberties – it could be some sort of equivalent of some science fiction books … think Asimov, Poul Anderson, Robert A. Heinlein, Larry Niven, etc …

I liked the movie, a lot …

it’s not The Core … not at all …

I think there would be some errors and bad astronomy … some people on the IMDB boards posted about them … (I won’t mention the comments, to avoid spoilers) … but I don’t think those are a serious crime …

I saw it, and I walked out about two thirds in.
It was a horror movie–complete with bloody stabbings, people burned to death, an insane horribly burned psychopath etc.,
and it made me physically sick for two hours after I fled. I may never see another new
Hollywood science fiction movie, as the creators are clearly psychopaths.

By the way, here is a more sensible way to turn on a star: You create an artifical small
black hole and send it into the interior of the star using a wormhole.
Both the wormhole and the black hole are created using mid 21 century
knowledge of higher dimensional string theory learned at the LHC after 20 years. The black hole absorbs star matter and creates an alternative
energy source.
Penny

Of course, it would still take a long time for the energy to reach the
upper layers of the star—so we use mid 21 century physics to find a way for the black hole produced energy to turn into the emission of
neutrino like particles that don’t interact with standard matter–which let’s them travel at the speed of light until they decay ( say just after
long enough to reach the upper layers) into standard matter. String theory should give particles like that. Again, we appeal to knowledge gained after several decades of artifical microblackhole experiments at the
LHC.

Another point–it wasn’t necessary for the sun to be almost dead–a small reduction in its output ( call it a long period variable star) would
be enough to threaten the earth. And that could be the result of deep internal process change started LONG ago.

I could have written a much better movie–with accurate science, in my sleep. With no psychopathy, and lots about physics, the LHC, human culture adapting to the threat and the cooling, how the icarus ship was designed, and built ( there is where human ambivalence and religious
resistance can come in) and then the launching and the trip.