00:29:541 (1) - maybe turning it into 2 sliders? Vocal, since the current rhythm feels that you try to give priority on pianos, instead of the vocal, which being the strongest here

:::

00:51:857 (5) - Hmmmmmm... Although stacking it with 00:51:413 (4) - will help giving this note less priority in order to emphasize 00:52:004 (1) - more, but since there's only a short time to react, it may be unreadable, what about try to stack it on 00:51:118 (3) - sliderend? It gives better readability and flow imo

00:29:541 (1) - maybe turning it into 2 sliders? Vocal, since the current rhythm feels that you try to give priority on pianos, instead of the vocal, which being the strongest here i am giving priority to piano, i feel like they would be more interesting to focus on

:::

00:51:857 (5) - Hmmmmmm... Although stacking it with 00:51:413 (4) - will help giving this note less priority in order to emphasize 00:52:004 (1) - more, but since there's only a short time to react, it may be unreadable, what about try to stack it on 00:51:118 (3) - sliderend? It gives better readability and flow imo

00:54:221 (5) - better than above, but the flow is kinda jiggly here, maybe place it like this? Yet it give larger feedback on 00:54:369 (1) - i dont think it flows that badly, i don't really want to put the circle out as a note on its own cuz i feel like it should tie in with the slider here, its just filler rhythm to me imo

01:02:497 (1,2,3) - Minor, but i think this will play a little bit better i prefer to keep it sort of blanketed with the slider

04:25:108 (1,2,3) - Could be cute if you mapped the vocal here as jump and circle instead of mapping the drum but I guess its fine if you prefer it that way. vocals here feel too messy, drums seem stronger anyway

00:29:541 (1) - I have a feel that there is something wrong with timing point offset, it's too low imo ( I know it's settled on white tick but still) sounds ok to me o-o01:33:088 (4,5) - This kind of linear jump would be rather unexpected here i do something like this on every part that gets the violin emphasis so u can kind of expect something like it 01:37:817 (5) - I cannot hear any sound that slider's end is representing its just for emphasis for the sharp violin02:00:428 (1) - As it is in the same combo maybe decrease the slider's speed? 02:00:428 - i want the finish to be with a faster slider here, also its for aesthetics02:07:669 (1,2,3,4,5) and 02:07:669 (1,2,3,4,5) - This pattern don't fit the rest, exchange 2 and 4, I think it should be more natural03:58:063 (6,1) and 04:02:792 (5,1) - It is really hard to read that it's 1/4 gap04:01:610 (2) - This goes in other direction without any reason imo explained in above mod04:40:488 (4) - I don't think kiai is needed here05:31:642 - I would try to make the segment y=40 x=from about 212 to 304 more simetrical i think its kind of artistic to have the center a bit asymmetrical here

It's everything I see, as Akitoshi said map is solid. I hope that some part of my mod will be helpful

03:32:201 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - feels a bit extreme in comparison to the buildup right before; maybe try scaling by .9 from its selection centre

04:00:576 (1,2) - ctrl + g to match the next patterns 04:00:871 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - . doesn't make sense for this to be upwards motion instead of the downwards motion the others use when they're all the same guitar riff

03:32:201 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - feels a bit extreme in comparison to the buildup right before; maybe try scaling by .9 from its selection centre then the circles would be overlapping :S. i dont want them too close to each other

04:00:576 (1,2) - ctrl + g to match the next patterns 04:00:871 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - . doesn't make sense for this to be upwards motion instead of the downwards motion the others use when they're all the same guitar riff