MSF donations

You are here

Evaluation Reports

Some evaluation reports are public and can be downloaded from this website, while others are restricted to MSF users and can only be accessed via Tukul. This limitation is mainly due to the sensitive nature of the operational contexts and the resulting content. However, there are internal discussions about making all evaluation reports publicly searchable. If you are an MSF association member, reports are made available on various associate platforms such as www.insideOCB.com. Alternatively, if you are interested in receiving a copy of an evaluation report, please contact us.

In Chad, MSF-OCA strategy of long-term projects and rapid responses to emergencies negatively impacted the standard decentralised supply approach; leading to supply constraints and sub-optimal supply quality standard. To tackle the issue, MSF-OCA Chad mission started to implement a centrally managed unallocated inventory strategy in early-2013.

Through this evaluation, MSF-OCA seeks to appraise how the inventory management outside the standard norm has benefited a mission like Chad, as well as reflecting on its original intended purpose, and its potential replicability.

This publication was produced at the request of MSF OCA, under the management of the Stockholm Evaluation Unit. It was prepared independently by Alexandre Crubézy.

MSF-OCG has been working in Sudan since 2004 and specifically on Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) since 2010, working in Gedaref State from a VL ward in the MoH Tabarak Allah Hospital (TBK) and since 2016 also from the Bazura Hospital. The original objectives of the project in 2009 were to improve the medical outcomes for the population affected by VL in Gedaref State through the provision of free and comprehensive treatment, improving diagnostic and treatment procedures, provision of technical support and assuring an adequate response by partners to allow for eventual MSF disengagement.

This publication was produced at the request of MSF OCG, under the management of the Vienna Evaluation Unit. It was prepared independently by Lawrence Gelmon.

On February 8, 2017, eight months after WHO declared the end of Ebola virus transmission in the country, Guinean authorities declared an outbreak of measles. During the preparation phase, MSF decided to conduct an evaluation simultaneously with the rolling-out of the vaccination campaign. The objective of this real-time evaluation of the campaign concerned its appropriateness, timeliness, effectiveness, impact and coverage.

This publication was produced at the request of OCB, under the management of the Stockholm Evaluation Unit. It was prepared independently by Marcela Allheimen.

The Codification Project had the objective of ‘Creating a common language for MSF’s articles’ and to that ends worked on the delivery of a central database known as UniData. This evaluation assessed the extent to which the project's 1st phase has been successful and making recommendations for improvements in the future.

The report was produced at the request of the Codification Project Steering Committee. It was prepared independently by Vincent MUDRY/Philanthropy Advisors S.a.r.l. under the management of the Stockholm Evaluation Unit of MSF. Finalized in March 2017.

This review aims to “encapsulate how regionalisation is understood and enacted in MSF and provide clarity for dialogue on best practices and lessons learned”. The study was limited to the experiences with MSF Southern Africa, South Asia, Latin America and East Africa as Regional Associations; the Movement-Wide Association; the ‘Nordic’; MSF Hong Kong; and the institutional thinking behind these Regional Associative Initiatives.

This publication was produced at the request of MSF International Board, under the management of the Stockholm Evaluation Unit. It was prepared independently by Kaat Boon.