'UFOs and Water' ~ Carl W. Feindt.

It is not surprising that they choose water, since they have found the way to make an anti-water shield to enter, you know that the territory of the
World Ocean is greater than that of the ground, with choosing the deep trenches, a lot can live there without even noticed and covering as big
territory as a whole continent.

I am surprised in this day and age that many haven't heard about USO's and UFO's being one and the same.

I do try to take into account new members come here daily and many may be young. I have also realized when you write something that you must keep
repeating.

The short version;

UFO's and USO's are one in the same they are air/water ships.

There are many Species (Humanoid) that call Earth home they have been here longer then we have...you should also know that they should really be known
as not only Extraterrestrial but also Terrestrial because of this.

As they say: We are safe and secure there is no equipment made on Earth that can reach us, we are in your waters in the DEEPEST of your waters.

Our Scientist have to look outside the box about what life needs to exist.

Hint; They can not survive on our lands because there is to much oxygen in our air however they can breathe thin air (hint-hint)

Look at a map of Earth look at the amount of land and look at the water now sit back and do some thinking.

Really interesting find, karl. Never heard of this guy before, but he writes well. Just skimmed the surface of the book so far. I'll give it a
deeper look when I have time. Thanks!

Thanks for the replies and Carl Feindt's website certainly describes a few fascinating cases

- found this one from Chile where a UFO/USO flew
around police officers emitting a 'light beam' before circling around a ship and submerging into the ocean very interesting - if only because there
was a very similar report from the same area two weeks later.

"I have taken extra space to analyze this CE-1 because I think it is one of the catalog's best TRUFO candidates. The object was observed
continuously by many geographically-independent witnesses for a period of about 8 hours. The close observations were made by three policemen. The
colonel added also in his report to Orion that neither of the policemen had consumed a drop of alcohol. The case remained unsolved. It was
appropriately titled by the newspaper La Tercera, "The OVNI with a 'Birth Certificate’ in the North."

There are also reports at the website about unknown objects going into (and out of) the water in
the Colares case from 1977 - freaky stuff.

.

Hollanda interviewed fishermen from Colares who had seen USOs going in and out of the water and who, like the fishermen in Puerto Rico,
reported seeing blue lights moving around underwater. 'Several weeks later I saw a light near a fishing boat,' said Hollanda. 'The light was blue.
It circled the boat once or twice about 300 meters away and then it dived into the water ... I saw it. It really happened.' The fishermen told
Hollanda that the object 'made no sound, like a blade going into water'. Another crew of fishermen reported seeing a blue light underwater, which
circled their boat, then emerged from the water..

Probably the most famous one is the Shag Harbour incident but the more you look into
certain cases the more you seem to find a connection with unidentified flying objects and large bodies of water - one example is the Bariloche case
from 1995 where the crew and passengers of a landing passenger jet witnessed a very strange object outside their aircraft window, the object then shot
off towards the surface of a nearby lake and was also witnessed by a military pilot in a separate jet.

Hey Intrptr, that's an intriguing polaroid and optical physicist Dr Bruce Maccabee discusses the technical details of the photograph
here, although the image analysis certainly is an interesting one I think it's also prudent to
point out that the photographer was Ed Walters who's quite a controversial chap (link)

always been fascinated with USOs, and the effect they have on water is definitely an indication of the propulsion systems we're talking about with
these craft..

Hey mate, Carl Feindt may have a point here as there are quite a few reports of UFOs 'sucking up water'

This type of case involves a UFO hovering over water. The witness describes a column of fog, mist, haze or water reaching from the surface to
the object. The terminology generally used in the description is “sucking up water”. This column, I believe, is caused by the rotation of a field
in a vertical plane that encompasses of the UFO.

It is not surprising.... that the other-worlder's starship's take too water as a fish does to the sea. That is... what a better way to conceal
themselves from the probing eyes of TPTB, as in USO's.

Karl12 --- Can you give me any quotes on any radar-clocked speeds of USO's?

Water...is probably the major reason why the other-worlder's visit our planet Earth, while is this sector of our galaxy. Not only for drinking and
watering plants on there starship --- but for fueling the starship itself, as in duterium based hydrogen fuel to power the possible photon engine, as
in fusion plasma; when the lack of photon's on some dark alien world requires the use of photons from fusion plasma.

Originally posted by Erno86
It is not surprising.... that the other-worlder's starship's take too water as a fish does to the sea. That is... what a better way to conceal
themselves from the probing eyes of TPTB, as in USO's.

Karl12 --- Can you give me any quotes on any radar-clocked speeds of USO's?

Water...is probably the major reason why the other-worlder's visit our planet Earth, while is this sector of our galaxy. Not only for drinking and
watering plants on there starship --- but for fueling the starship itself, as in duterium based hydrogen fuel to power the possible photon engine, as
in fusion plasma; when the lack of photon's on some dark alien world requires the use of photons from fusion plasma.

Off the top of my head, I'm aware of 2 famous USO encounters involving navies, 1 was in the Baltic (not connected with the current submerged object on
the bottom) involving the Norwegian Navy and there was another incident involving the Argentine Navy, can't recall if speeds were mentioned, but
possibly k12 will be able to answer that one. I do know that in the Argentine case, it was reported that the object broke up into several pieces
before leaving the water, and torpedoes were ruled out also.

Karl12 --- Can you give me any quotes on any radar-clocked speeds of USO's?

Erno, here's the Waterufo.net link for the incident mentioned by Zcustosmorum and the (alleged) speed and depth of the object sound pretty remarkable
- I also found it interesting that the military witness also claims he was ordered never to discuss the incident by his superiors and the ship's log
book was tampered with as there are quite a few other reports of this happening.

A sonar operator aboard a destroyer reported that one of the subs suddenly commenced pursuit of an unknown submerged object that was moving at
"over 150 knots" (170-plus miles per hour!). According to most accounts, similar sonar reports of a high-speed object began coming in from all of
the other ships and from the sonar-trailing aircraft. One of Sanderson's sources stated that no less than 13 craft recorded in their logs that their
sonars had tracked this object. Allegedly, the unknown target continued to be tracked for four days as it maneuvered down to depths of 27,000 feet.

After appearing on BoA:Audio for a brief interview that generated a lot of buzz last Fall, Carl Feindt returns to the program for an in-depth
discussion on the water-UFO connection. We'll be exploring why Carl decided to investigate this aspect of Ufology, interesting trends and fascinating
insights that he has gained from his research, cases that he does not think are related to UFOs, the international aspects of the phenomenon, sea
monsters, radar and sonar cases, UFOs. v. USOs, "Water Wheels", the Eltanin, Shag Harbour, and a ton more aquatic-themed esoteric material.

We plumb the depths of the UFO-water connection as BoA:Audio returns with a must-hear episode for any serious student of Ufology.

Full Preview: We kick things off with the standard bio / background on Carl Feindt, how he got interested in the UFO phenomenon, specifically the
water-UFO connection. We then discuss why it seems like USOs have remained in the background of UFO studies. After that, we talk about Carl's
exhaustive website waterufo.net and how he collected the vast number of cases detailed at the site. This segues into some discussion on how the work
of Ted Phillips inspired Carl to investigate USOs.

We look at some of the USO trends that have emerged as Carl has compiled so many cases. Looking at perhaps the key trend that Carl has discovered, we
discuss the UFO's physical effects on water, a revelation that Carl says made him a true believer in the UFO phenomenon. He gives a detailed
summation of the four types of UFO & water interraction and how they explain a lot about the way UFOs operate. We talk about potential "trace cases"
upon the water. This leads to some discussion on the water temperature changes caused by UFOs.

Carl destroys binnall's theory of USOs and aircraft carriers, which leads to talk about sonar and radar reports of USOs. After that, we find out
about Carl's cases that involve "death in the water" and why he stresses to future Ufologists to "have the specimens analyzed." We cover fish
reactions to USOs. Carl shares the influences on his "field theory" regarding UFOs and what the mystery of the field was to him.

We talk about a fascinating case of two divers who died possibly due to exposure to a USO and how heat generated from the UFO's field has been
reported to cause rain to turn into steam. Carl explains why he hates theories about UFOs taking ships and how that line of thinking is a systemic
problem related to UFO studies. Staying in line with temperature effects from the UFOs, we talk about reports of interraction between the craft and
ice along with snow and UFOs. We also explore the potential of snow circles, similar to crop circles.

After that, we look at the possibility that classic sea monster reports could actually be USOs. We find out if there is an average USO report, i.e.
going into & out of the water, going in and not coming out, just coming out, totally submerged, etc. Carl also explains how the USO reports run the
gamut of all bodies of water, except for one and he explains why.

USOs taking on water ... we get Carl's opinion on why there are some reports of USOs extracting water. We talk about "water wheels" and why Carl
says they are a real phenomenon but not almost certainly not related to USOs. Staying on the topic of UFO occupants taking on water, we discuss some
of the stories where this occurs. Carl explains how this is different from the appearance of UFOs floating over water and sucking it up. We also find
out that these stories of occupants obtaining water for their UFOs range from the late 1800's all the way up to 2001.

Mrgone, thanks for the reply and let us know how the research went as there are plenty of very intriguing accounts found on his website - these
statements about the subject from Russian Naval personnel are also pretty interesting and were featured in an article on the Fox News website:

“On several occasions the instruments gave reading of material objects moving at incredible speed. Calculations showed speeds of about
230 knots, of 400 kph. Speeding so fast is a challenge even on the surface. But water resistance is much higher. It was like the objects defied the
laws of physics. There’s only one explanation: the creatures who built them far surpass us in development". Russian Naval Rear Admiral Yury Beketov

“Ocean UFOs often show up wherever our or NATO’s fleets concentrate. Near Bahamas, Bermudas, Puerto Rico. They are most often seen in the
deepest part of the Atlantic Ocean, in the southern part of the Bermuda Triangle, and also in the Caribbean Sea.” Captain 1st rank Igor Barklay

“Fifty percent of UFO encounters are connected with oceans. Fifteen more – with lakes. So UFOs tend to stick to the water". Vladimir Azhazha,Russian Naval Officer

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.