Choose country

Phoenix Galaxy stars explode stellar evolution theory

by Rod Bernitt

The popular magazine Astronomy1
recently reported that young stars have been found in the nearby Phoenix dwarf galaxy.
Galaxies are regarded as large assemblies of stars containing millions, even billions
of stars along with dust and gas held together by gravity. Galaxies tend to be clustered
together in groups. The Milky Way galaxy is part of the Local Group that contains
about 30 galaxies. As D.L. Moche explains:

‘Local means that the galaxies are within a region 3 million light-years across.
Three of these galaxies—our Milky Way, Andromeda (M31), and M33 in Triangulum—are spirals. The others are ellipticals (including M31’s bright companions
NGC 205 and M32) or irregulars (including the Magellanic Clouds). Several are dwarf
galaxies, small, low-mass galaxies a few thousand light-years in diameter.’
2

The Phoenix dwarf galaxy lies about 1.3 million light years (400,000 parsecs)3 from Earth and is part of the Local
Group of galaxies. Within the central region of the Phoenix galaxy, blue Population
I4 stars have been observed. Astronomers
believe that the light of Population I stars is blue and intense because the stars
are very hot. According to stellar evolutionary theory, Population I stars are young.
Also, a sphere of red Population II stars surrounds the central region of the Phoenix
galaxy. Population II stars are generally red and thus considered to have cooler
surface temperatures. According to stellar evolutionary theory, Population II stars
are old.

Photo by NASA
The Phoenix dwarf galaxy lies about 1.3 million light years (400,000 parsecs)3 from Earth and is part of the Local Group of galaxies.

How do astronomers determine the age of a star? There is no direct method. The age
is worked out based on assumptions about what stars are, how they form, and how
they change over millions of years. We need to realise that these assumptions have
very limited testability. No one was present to observe the stars form in the past,
and no stars have been observed to form in the present. (Evolutionists claim to
find evidence of ongoing star formation in various gas nebulae but none have been
actually imaged, and the glowing could be heated, compressed gas.)5 Furthermore, there has not been enough time to observe
any of the evolutionary changes postulated by stellar evolutionary theory.

Nevertheless, starting from a theoretical sequence of how they envisage stars have
evolved over millions of years, astronomers interpret the age of a star from its
colour and brightness (or magnitude). These are plotted on the standard astronomy
tool used to classify stellar populations, the Hertzsprung-Russell or H-R diagram
(simply a plot of brightness vs colour). Most stars plot together forming a curved
line termed the ‘main sequence’.6

For example, astronomers assume that all main sequence stars with a mass equal or
greater than 0.08 of the sun’s mass, derive all their energy by ‘burning’
hydrogen by nuclear fusion. Main sequences stars with greater than 1.2 solar masses
are assumed to ‘burn’ hydrogen via the carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen
(CNO) cycle. These assumptions are difficult to test. From these assumptions, astronomers
working on the Phoenix project have concluded that the Population I stars are much
younger stars:

‘We present new deep VI ground-based photometry of the Local Group dwarf galaxy
Phoenix. Our results confirm that this galaxy is mainly dominated by red stars,
with some blue plume stars indicating recent (100 Myr old) star formation in the
central part of the galaxy. … These results were then used to obtain the color-magnitude
diagrams for three different regions of Phoenix in order to study the variation
of the properties of its stellar Population.’ 7

This discovery of young Population I stars in the dwarf Phoenix galaxy has astonished
astronomers because it does not fit the current ideas of galaxy formation:

‘Finding such youthful (100-million-year-old) stars is surprising because
dwarf galaxies are thought by many cosmologists to have assembled billions of years
ago, before the epoch of giant-galaxy formation. The Phoenix dwarf’s young
stars, observed with the 100-inch du Pont Telescope at Las Campanas Observatory
in Chile, are distributed asymmetrically in the galaxy’s central region, indicating
that a recent wave of star formation swept that region.’ 1

The claim that a recent wave of star formation occurred is special pleading when
contradictory data for stellar evolution theory is uncovered. In fact some H-R diagram
data for the Phoenix indicate stars with intermediate ages ranging from 3 to 10
billion years, so the young Population I stars stand out sharply.8

A good example of such special pleading is quasars with large red shifts (z >
3.0) that exhibit carbon monoxide and iron in their spectra. Here a similar argument
is used as in the case of Phoenix. Evolutionists invoke a past generation of star
formation and death in the quasar host galaxies to explain the presence of carbon
monoxide and iron. Evolutionists know that if they admit the carbon monoxide or
iron is primordial, ‘big bang’ nucleosynthesis has real trouble. Where
does this type of reasoning stop? What would falsify the concept? So long as evolutionists
can invoke a past, unseen wave of star formation, stellar evolution theory will
remain intact without any holes showing up.

A case in point is Quasar BR 1202-0725 in Virgo with a red shift (z) of 4.69 has
been found to contain carbon monoxide. A z of 4.69 in ‘big bang’ cosmology,
indicates that the object is at an immense distance from Earth (billions and billions
of light years). It is considered to have formed shortly after the ‘big bang’.

As the report states:

‘Because no chemical elements heavier than lithium were produced during the
Big Bang’s nuclear-fusion phase, their presence in a distant object shows
that at least one generation of stars must have lived and died there. … While
the universe’s exact age at that epoch depends on still-uncertain parameters,
it’s safe to say that the telltale radiation was emitted less than two billion
years after the Big Bang.’ 9

The issue is the presence of the ‘one generation of stars’
that ‘lived and died there’. Evolutionists invoke a past, unseen
wave of star formation to rescue stellar evolution theory and ‘big bang’
nucleosynthesis realising that the existence of elements other than hydrogen and
helium and lithium in the early universe contradicts ‘big bang’ cosmology.
A young Earth creation cosmology can interpret this observation as indicating that
something more than hydrogen, helium and lithium were present in the early universe,
shortly after its origin.

An appeal to a wave of unobserved star formation in the Phoenix dwarf also encounters
the question, where did the Phoenix obtain the additional gas clouds needed to create
these young Population I stars?

‘The young population located in the central component of Phoenix shows a
clear asymmetry in its distribution, with the younger blue plume stars predominantly
located in the western half of the central component and the older core helium-burning
stars predominantly situated in the east. This spatial variation could indicate
a propagation of star formation across the central component. The H I cloud found
at ~6´ southwest by Young & Lo could have been involved in this process.’
7

The key words are ‘could have been involved.’ Such explanations
should be recognised as story telling, because astronomers don’t know for
sure.

An alternative explanation should be obvious, namely that the Phoenix dwarf is not
billions of years old but is much younger. Occam’s Razor favours the simple
answer: Population I and II stars formed at about the same time.

Genesis 1:14–19 and Genesis 1:31–2:3 provide a framework that can
be applied to interpret the Phoenix data. Creationists could conclude that Population
I and II stars are the same age, both being created on Day 4 of Creation week. This
has significant implications for how the astronomical data are interpreted and for
stellar evolution theory.

At the present there is no consensus among young Earth creationists on this point.
I prefer Occam’s Razor. When applied to Population I stars like spectral
class OB stars (the largest masses on the main sequence), these would all be 1st
generation. Evolutionists would claim that since the ‘big bang’, there
have been thousands of generations of OB stars.

‘On the other end of the scale, the main-sequence lifetime of the most massive
stars (those with more than 11 solar masses) is 10,000,000 years or less. As a result,
thousands of generations of those heavy weights have come and gone since the Big
Bang. Note that when we say these stars have ‘come and gone,’ usually
that means only that they have been transformed into a ‘dead’ remnant
that no longer feeds on nuclear energy.’ 10

Evolutionists interpret the observation of young Population I stars in the Phoenix
dwarf galaxy through this framework. It should be noted that testing such claims
appears to fall outside the realm of current, empirical science.

In the Phoenix data for Population I stars, we see evidence in the Local Group for
an abrupt-origin model. The existence of young stars contradicts the ‘big
bang’ cosmology, namely the assumption of evolutionists that these small dwarf
galaxies formed billions of years ago, perhaps only 1 or 2 billion years after the
postulated ‘big bang’. The finding points to the Local Group dwarf galaxies
being young, and not billions of years old.

References

In astronomy, distances are popularly expressed in light-years
(LY)—the distance that light would travel through a vacuum in one year (9.46
x 1012 km). However, astronomers more frequently use the parsec, which
is equivalent to 3.262 LY. One parsec is the distance that would be subtended by
an angle of one arcsec (1/3600 of a degree) across a distance of one astronomical
unit. (One AU is the average distance between the earth and sun).
Return to text.

Stars within galaxies are classified as either Population
I or Population II stars depending on a number of characteristics. For a detailed
explanation see: Faulkner, D.R., The role of stellar population types in the discussion
of stellar evolution, Creation Res. Soc. Quart. 30(1):8–11,
1993. Return to text.

Martinez-Delgado, D., Gallart, C. and Aparicio, A., The stellar
content of the Local Group dwarf galaxy Phoenix, The Astronomical Journal 118(2):862–882, 1999, as cited in the NASA ADS Astronomy
Abstract Service at
adswww.harvard.edu, January 2000. Return to text.

Held, E.V., Saviane, I. and Momany, Y., Stellar populations
in the Phoenix dwarf galaxy, Astronomy and Astrophysics 345:747–759,
1999, as cited in the NASA ADS Astronomy Abstract Service at
adswww.harvard.edu January 2000. Return to text.

Your subscription already exists. We have just sent you an email that will allow you to update your details.

Thanks for subscribing

Check your email!(If you haven’t received your first email within a few minutes, try checking your spam folder.)

You are leaving CREATION.com

We have supplied this link to an article on an external website in good faith. But we cannot assume responsibility for, nor be taken as endorsing in any way, any other content or links on any such site. Even the article we are directing you to could, in principle, change without notice on sites we do not control.

Affiliated Sites

Creation Ministries International (CMI) exists to support the effective proclamation of the Gospel by providing credible answers that affirm the reliability of the Bible, in particular its Genesis history.

CMI has offices in Australia, Canada, Singapore, New Zealand, United Kingdom, South Africa and United States of America.