Health Warning
GOP leaders’ push for quick passage of the health-care proposal hit another snag as at least a dozen Republican senators expressed alarm over a nonpartisan report that projects the number of uninsured would grow by millions under the plan. The loss of more than two Republican votes in the Senate would kill the legislation, presuming all Democratic senators remained opposed. House leaders have hoped the plan’s momentum can overpower infighting over details, but reworking the bill to address the concerns of Senate Republicans—which include changes to Medicaid, the trajectory of premium prices and the impact on costs for older, low-income and rural Americans—could mean missing the goal of getting it through Congress by early April. And modifying the bill in ways that appease one faction of Republicans without alienating another will be delicate work.

Advertisement

Money to Burn
A flood of natural gas swamping the U.S. is turning into a global glut, sinking prices and dimming American producers’ hopes of exporting their way out. Natural-gas futures are down 25% over the past 2½ months after rising 59% in 2016, and shares of gas-production companies are among the worst performers of 2017, after a year in which both Chesapeake Energy and Rice Energy more than doubled from their early lows. Many investors wagered that new gas-fired power plants and record exports would help burn off the U.S. excess, but the market continues to be dominated by unpredictable weather and massive new supplies from fracking.

Steve Bannon’s Journey
On Oct. 7, 2008, Marty Bannon watched with alarm as plunging stock markets dragged down his shares of AT&T, the nest egg he built during a 50-year career at the company. So he did the unthinkable: He sold. Now 95 years old, he still regrets the decision and seethes over Washington’s response to the economic crisis that forced it. His son, White House counselor and chief strategist Steve Bannon, says the moment crystallized his own antiestablishment outlook and helped trigger a decadelong political hardening. No official has more influence on a wider portfolio of issues than Mr. Bannon, who has become a litmus test for how people view the Trump administration. In an interview with the Journal, he discusses what led him to embrace “economic nationalism.”

Cloud of Suspicion
In an age of hacking and surveillance, what could possibly go wrong with hundreds of millions of people storing personal data in a centralized warehouse? Still, companies like Google, Apple and Dropbox urge us to load our photos and sometimes even more precious documents onto “the cloud”—that is, huge racks of servers scattered around the world. But a lesser-known alternative is gaining traction: “personal cloud” storage, a hard drive that is in your home but that you can access online from anywhere. A private cloud makes a smaller target for hackers, though it isn’t without shortcomings of its own. Our Personal Technology columnist Geoffrey A. Fowler compares the options and offers tips to minimize the risk of being hacked.

The approximate amount that Mr. Trump paid in federal taxes in 2005, according to a leaked return released Tuesday—most of it due to the alternative minimum tax, meant to limit the degree to which high-income individuals can use legal deductions and credits to reduce their tax liability. Mr. Trump reported about $153 million in income that year.

QUOTE OF THE DAY

In the past, terrorists did not target Malaysia, but today the threat has changed…Malaysia has become a really important target.

Going back to our story above, what do you think about the revelations about Mr. Trump’s 2005 tax return? Send your comments, which we may edit before publication, to 10point@wsj.com. Please include your name and location.

—Compiled by Margaret Rawson

READER RESPONSE

Responding to yesterday’s question on the Congressional Budget Office report on the GOP health-care plan,Dolores Yvars of New York shared: “What is truly disturbing is the knee-jerk acceptance by the media of the CBO numbers, when their projections were so far off concerning Obamacare.” Dennis J. Campagna of New York said: “This is our moment to determine if health insurance for all is a right or a privilege. The proposed version eliminates health care for up to 24 million while providing substantial economic benefits to those who need it least. The proposed plan will deny coverage to those who need it most—the elderly, the disabled and the poor.” And Steve Shannon of New Jersey commented: “Sen. Lindsey Graham analyzed the report best: Even if it’s half-right, it’s got some disturbing data that call for thoughtful discussion and debate rather than charging ahead with votes based more on the political than the practical.”

This daily briefing is named “The 10-Point” after the nickname conferred by the editors of The Wall Street Journal on the lead column of the legendary “What’s News” digest of top stories. Technically, “10-point” referred to the size of the typeface. The type is smaller now, but the name lives on.

You are currently subscribed as . For further assistance, please contact Customer Service at support@wsj.comCopyright 2017 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

---------------------------

All titles, content, publisher names, trademarks, artwork, and associated imagery are trademarks and/or copyright material of their respective owners. All rights reserved. The Spam Archive website contains material for general information purposes only. It has been written for the purpose of providing information and historical reference containing in the main instances of business or commercial spam.

Lets beat spam together
Many of the messages in Spamdex's archive contain forged headers in one form or another. The fact that an email claims to have come from one email address or another does not mean it actually originated at that address!Please use spamdex responsibly.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records index for all time

Please contact us with any comments or questions at questions@spamdex.co.uk. Spam Archive is a non-profit library of thousands of spam email messages sent to a single email address. A number of far-sighted people have been saving all their spam and have put it online. This is a valuable resource for anyone writing Bayesian filters. The Spam Archive is building a digital library of Internet spam. Your use of the Archive is subject to the Archive's Terms of Use. All emails viewed are copyright of the respected companies or corporations. Special thanks: We would like to thank Benedict who is a SEO Consultant who has freely given up his time to advise us on how best to maximise on our organic search traffic strategy and also for his wonderful creative vision on how to spread the word about Spamdex and how we try to combat spam across the globe. Click here for more information.

Our inspiration is the "Internet Archive" USA. "Libraries exist to preserve society's cultural artefacts and to provide access to them. If libraries are to continue to foster education and scholarship in this era of digital technology, it's essential for them to extend those functions into the digital world." This is our library of unsolicited emails from around the world. See https://archive.org. Spamdex is in no way associated though.Supporters and members of http://spam.abuse.net Helping rid the internet of spam, one email at a time. Working with Inernet Aware to improve user knowlegde on keeping safe online. | Link to us | Terms | Privacy | Cookies | Complaints | Copyright | Spam emails / ICO | Spam images | Sitemap

Important: Users take note, this is Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. Some of the pages indexed could contain offensive language or contain fraudulent offers. If an offer looks too good to be true it probably is! Please tread, carefully, all of the links should be fine. Clicking I agree means you agree to our terms and conditions. We cannot be held responsible etc etc.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records

The Glass House | London | SW19 8AE |

Spamdex is a digital archive of unsolicited electronic mail4.8 out of 5
based on reviews