I don't know what's going on with it. Earlier today she had over 800, but I am sure some of those were from the F5 sect.

ATS has a good poll system, but I never see them use it anymore. I am curious as to what ATS would poll at so maybe we can request Skeptic Overlord
to set up another one because I wouldn't trust a linked site like the one in the OP.

Why do you think the odds are so small that Hillary is getting support at a different time than Trump got support?

If you ask me, I agree with an earlier poster...sounds like the Trump fans were trying to manipulate the vote before the website the poll is on caught
the manipulation. If it is restricted by IP address, it is possible that the database doesn't continually monitor that but runs a clean up job every
so often. That would explain what you saw as a drop in Trumps votes and what would appear a surge in Clinton...but it's just that Clinton's votes
didn't get purged like Trumps.

I just think it is funny all you Trump supporters are, once again, discounting a poll when it shows him losing.

Take, for example, Donald Trump’s latest accusation: After the Iranian government executed a nuclear scientist, Trump tweeted: “The Iranian
government killed him because of Hillary Clinton’s ‘hacked’ e-mails.” His source: “Many people are saying” it.

originally posted by: Puppylove
Problem is to do that they may have to include the third parties in the debates.

They SHOULD have to include third parties in the debates. What is this dumb 15% rule anyway?

This stupid rule was developed by a supposedly non-partisan, PRIVATE, non-profit organization: The Commission on Presidential Debates.
Link

WTH? Why on earth should we accept their silly flipping rule? Apparently the CPD has some legal right to make this shameful rule, but it is horrible
for the voters and it is OBVIOUSLY A SCAM.

The two parties gave them their legal authority. It's abhorrent.

People are held hostage by the two party system. Many people UNDERSTANDABLY won't vote third party because they are worried the 'other' party will
win. So this polling 15% method is a terrible litmus test.

How about polling people to ask if they want third parties included in the debates? And if it's over 50%, then the third parties are included in
the debates.

Now THAT would be democratic.

Shenanigans, I tell you.

Yep, Johnson claim it was a rigged system and tried to sue but the courts dismissed it.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.