Glenn
Beck is correct – absolutely, positively correct - when he recognizes
that our Constitutional government is being attacked from the top and
from the bottom. But the problem is, we need to know who controls the
top and who controls the bottom. The answer is, and has been before us
for generations, but it is so simple and so huge that most people cannot
see it and believe it.

Those
at the top have to be in a position to gain the cooperation of wealthy
and influential people, legislators, judges, and also the Presidents themselves.
They need to have great influence on the international scene. They need
to have an organization with a large following that is able to influence
other organizations. It must attract people of all religions and be trusted
without question by a large percentage of its members. It must have power
to influence media. Does such an organization exist? It most certainly
does, and you or one of your groups may be a part of it.

Those
at the bottom have to have strong leadership, be able to influence educational
policy, gain citizen cooperation, form and convince activist groups to
make demands, and block the efforts of those who dare to oppose them.

I am
not so smart that I could figure out who represents the top and who represents
the bottom all by myself, but I am good at research and making sense of
what other people and news sources have written.

My first
and most important instructor was the crazy Frenchman Auguste Comte who
lived from 1798 to 1857. Can you believe the United States are in the
process of being taken over by a system set up more than a century and
one half ago by a long dead Frenchman? If you can't possibly believe it,
you will never know what hit you when you lose whatever freedom is left
in our country. After more than 150 years it is still possible to make
accurate predictions about group behavior by studying his plan of control.

Advertisement

Comte
called the management of groups of people a science, "social science."
But think about this: if there is a true science of managing groups of
people, and if it is 100% successful, everyone would live according to
the plans of these "social scientists" and no one would be free
to make his own decisions.

Social
science cannot exist with individual freedom or Constitutional government.
We cannot be both free and controlled. It is either social science or
freedom. If the management of people is accepted as a science, personal
freedom is impossible. Social "scientists" would become the
world's culture designers.

If the
idea of such a total design and world re-construction seems to you to
be outside the realm of possibility, do not assume that everyone else
shares your doubts. The influential Harvard psychologist, B. F. Skinner,
for example, not only advocated world re-construction, he also did his
part to alter human behavior to bring it about.

Skinner
taught that under the new culture design people would have to give up
such principles as happiness, freedom, and virtue. In exchange they are
promised order, predictability, control, uniformity, efficiency, and freedom
from all personal feelings, thoughts, associations, obligations, and punishments.

Our
children in public schools and young adults in college are taught to believe
in social "sciences" and to try to change the world by participating
in projects suggested by social "scientists." Millions of students
are graduated every year obsessed with the idea that they must work with
change agents and participate in "changing the world" or "making
a difference."

It does
not matter to the change agents whether the young fanatics join with those
at the top or those at the bottom so long as they join some kind of a
world-changing group.

What
about the students and others who follow world changers at the "top?"
What is the organization that works to keep them involved in bringing
about the World Management System? Unless you do further research beginning
with the articles at the end of this discussion you will be inclined to
reject the thought. However, research proves that the organizations these
followers use and trust are the United States and the International Chambers
of Commerce.

Subscribe
to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter
Your E-Mail Address:

I have
heard others say and write: No, it is the Masons, the Catholics, the Jews,
the Illuminati, the Trilateral Commission, the Humanists, the Muslims,
etc. etc. etc. I would not argue with them, but I would point out that
if their theory is true they would have to prove the group they have chosen
is also in charge of the social "sciences" and the U.S. and
International Chambers of Commerce.

As Glen
Beck keeps reminding his audience, do your own research.
I hope you will start with some or all of the following articles:

Erica Carle is an independent
researcher and writer. She has a B.S. degree from the University of Wisconsin.
She has been involved in radio and television writing and production,
and has also taught math and composition at the private school her children
attended in Brookfield, Wisconsin. For ten years she wrote a weekly column,
"Truth In Education" for WISCONSIN REPORT, and served as Education Editor
for that publication.

My
first and most important instructor was the crazy Frenchman Auguste Comte
who lived from 1798 to 1857. Can you believe the United States are in
the process of being taken over by a system set up more than a century
and one half ago by a long dead Frenchman?