A blog with stories that tell of the life in the big city, multicultural encounters, languages and personal thoughts on political and social issues, particularly gay rights and religion. By Ahuv 柯俊杰

13 May 2010

UK: Pessimism as anti-gay MP becomes Equality Minister

Theresa May has been chosen to act as Home Secretary and Minister for Women and Equality by the new Cameron-led government in Great Britain. Her suitability for the position has been questioned by people who highlighted her voting record (see below for details): Except for the Civil Partnership Act, she has constantly either voted against bills that made LGBTs more equal and been (purposely?) absent from parliament when many of them were discussed. Pinknews quotes David Henry of gay rights group OutRage! saying: “Mrs May is the wrong person for the job", “She's always been against gay rights since I can remember. I'm pretty sure she's opposed almost every gay rights measure”.

Commentator called her “a notorious homophobe”, “an insane appointment”, and opined: “She voted against equal age of consent. She voted against adoption equality. She wanted to maintain the fascist section 28. There are no ifs and no buts about it. Theresa May is a homophobe”. Another commentator said “May is my MP and I've actually met her. (…) The woman rejects anything that doesn't fit in her narrow-minded view of the world.”

Many asked for her to be interviewed by the gay media about her commitment to equality and if there has been a change of mind since the last few years. If one wants to take the initiative, she can be reached at mayt@parliament.uk or via her website’s contact form

It is engrossing to presume from this theory and area of its appendix in gambling.That I know on every side it - it concerns statistics, is applied to the conclusiveness of the nonlinear equations.Vastly much the explanation to the problem decision (as a remedy for till now anybody so plainly illustrate nothing a smog) interests:There is a teleshow - the performer and the leader.There are three doors. Behind one of them the prize, behind two others is not present.The chief offers a creme de la creme to the gambler that accordingly chooses any of 3 doors (their probabilities are fifty-fifty).After the choice is made, the leader who knows where lies a trophy, opens joined of those doors that are not chosen via the trouper and shows that there the prize is not present. Also suggests the participant to select from time to time again already between 2 doors.Question - how to arrive to the player? (In a source it is specified that it is high-priority to replace a option, the distinct possibility of a pickings behind a door on which was specified before the player who is doing not direct = 66.7 %.Profoundly much I attend to for councils or at least references where to look.As a service to more intersting look http://www.obu.edu/centers/images/index.html