eARTherapy

(c)CS

eARTherapy & eARTh-based Practice

"eARTherapy" (Sibbett, 1995, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2016)
is a synthesis of Art Psychotherapy, Ecotherapy and Counselling / Psychotherapy - celebrating and fostering nature and eco-creativity. This involves working creatively with and for Nature. eARTherapy features eARTh-based practice, a
key aim being to nurture wellbeing, eco-creativity, Nature and our relationship the rest of nature; underpinned by
and committed to 'earth caring' values.

"The
most serious, most dangerous health challenge all of us in the human
family face is to reverse the planet's continuing ecological
deterioration. It is the most profound health issue of all times, from a
historical perspective. Why? For the first time in the long human
story, our species faces a health challenge that if not resolved
will foreclose opportunities to solve humankind's countless other
problems, including a multiplicity of health problems. The human species
now must be included on the endangered species list. This is the
bottom-line health challenge we all face."

"Obviously, if all plant life is destroyed, the humanoid life
will follow." (ST:TOS)

eARTh-based practice

It has been proposed that "eARTherapy" (Sibbett, 1995, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2009, 2016) featuring "eARTh-based practice" is an important wider dimension and application of art therapy.

"Natural environments can potentially have direct and indirect effects
on emotional processes—directly by activating or reducing emotions, and
indirectly by influencing other important processes related to emotions
or emotion regulation. Executive functioning and certain aspects of
self-regulation are fundamental for emotion regulation, and research
indicates that exposure to nature may have a beneficial impact on these
functions, for example, by making it easier to think about feelings."(Johnsen, 2011).

Perhaps this might be termed "environ-mentalisation". This could be an ecological development of the concept of mentalisation as proposed by Fonagy et al(Fonagy, Gergely, Jurist & Target, 2002).

It is suggested that "ecological intelligence" (McCallum, 2008), and indeed eARTh-based practice, is vital in therapeutic and related professions and it involves being actively engaged in fostering eco-creativity. "eARTh-based practice" is founded on being committed to an integrative holistic model of wellbeing that embraces various models of healthcare: 'eco-biopsychosocial" (cf. Sibbett, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2006), ecozoic (Berry, 1992), biopsychosocial (Engel, 1977), biopsychosocial-spiritual dimensions (Sulmasy, 2006) and "biopsycho-ecological" model (Stineman and Streim, 2010: 1035). eARTh-based practice also involves commitment to respecting and promoting diversity and biodiversity.

Carl Jung wrote: "You must go in quest of yourself, and you will find yourself again only in the simple and forgotten things. Why not go into the forest for a time, literally? Sometimes a tree tells you more than can be read in books." (Jung, 2008, p.6).

Berry (2002: 104) proposes that in:

"the emerging ecological age, the age of the growing intercommunion among all the living and nonliving systems of the planet, ... medicine in this context would envisage the earth as primary healer. It would also envisage integration with earth's functioning as the primary basis of health for the human being."

Berry (1992) argues that, in biological terms, the Earth is at the end of the Cenozoic era (industrial severe diminishment of the planet) and needs to transition into what he calls the Ecozoic era; he argues (p.46) that "The arts are beginning to experience this change." Writing of the role of artists in the Ecozoic era, Berry (1992: 46-48) argues that:

"we must understand that the universe is a communion of subjects, not a collection of objects... the best artists are those who carry us deepest into this experience of communion. ... the Earth is primary and the human derivative. ... The first concern in every field of human endeavour must be the integration with the Earth community. … we try to be healthy on a sick planet… If art becomes limited to human processes, or to human imagination, lacking in intimate relationship with the larger natural world, the art field will lose much of its vigor and purpose. We are becoming aware that the extinction of species, the destruction of the rain forests, the devastation of marine life, the isolationof humanity in an Epcot planet is leading us toward a disaster of untold dimension, both as individual art is and as citizens of the universe. … Now we can perceive the universe as irreversible process and recognize that wanton species extinction is a permanent wound in the biological order. … The endowment that we have inherited becomes infinitely precious to the artist, as to every component of the universe community. The artist is integral to this larger process. … the intimacy of the artist with the entire range of earthly affairs must awaken forebodings about the future, and that these very forebodings will inevitably appear in the visual, literary, and performing arts."

Wilson proposes the concept of "biophilia"and he refers to biofilia as an “innate tendency to focus on life and lifelikeprocesses“ (Wilson 1984, p.1) and an “innate emotional affiliation of human beings to other living organisms“ (Wilson 1993, p.31). Heinsch (2012, p.309) comments on Wilson's (1984, 1993) concept of "biophilia"
and notes that "According to Wilson's biophilia hypothesis, people have
an innate need to associate with the natural world, and this connection
can enhance their physical and psychological well-being." Wilson indicated within his biophilia hypothesis that most people living in Western society are likely to suffer from nature deprivation due to a lack of natural stimuli. He advocated contact with natural diversity and order to be essential to normal development.

Tree Pearl (c)CS

eARTherapy

It is vital to view therapy within an eco-biopsychosocial model, as consistent with the "Health Environmental Integration model" (HEI) (Stineman, 1981) which conceptualises a "functional interaction between the person and the environment by four overlapping spheres: mind, body, physical world, and society. In the HEI model, the health and experiences of any person depend on the health of the environment and vice versa." (p.36).

In such a model, "the health of any person depends
on the health of the environment along with other factors" (Lee & Siebens, 2007). This is also consistent with the need to "expand our paradigm of the self to include the natural habitat. ... It's time for an environmentally based definition of mental health." (Roszak, 1996, 2013). Schuster (1992, p.2) cites Conn's (1991, p.73) view that "... we need to broaden our concept of self to include other groups of people and other life forms."

Stineman and Streim (2010: 1035) advocate a "biopsycho-ecological model of health, illness, injury, and disability." Roszak comments that "a growing number of psychologists have begun to place their theory and
practice in an ecological context. Already ecopsychology has yielded
insights of great value."

"In devastating the natural environment, we may be undermining a basic requirements of sanity: our sense of moral reciprocity with the nonhuman environment. Yet ecopsychology also
offers hope. As ecocidal as our behavior may have become, our bond with
the planet endures; something within us voices a warning. Ecopsychologists
have begun to detect in people evidence of an unspoken grieving for the
great environmental losses the world is suffering." (Roszak, 1996, 2013).

Nature joins as a mutual aspect of the therapeutic alliance - thus forming a Therapeutic Tetrad / Quadrad (Sibbett, 2002...).
Appropriate use of ritual, rites of passage, and creative liminality, are important (Sibbett, 2005, 2006).

MacKinnon (2014) makes a call for "rewilding" - creating conditions that will support wildlife in all its diversity; "to bring wildness back into all spaces of the planet in whatever ways
that we can. Rewilding, MacKinnon suggests, means to support nature’s
potential — its capacity to sustain an abundance and variety of life" (Neilson, 2014). Schuster (1992) proposes a "paradigm of environmental ethic growth comprising interrelationships among stages of moral reasoning; the person in relation to nature; and valuation of material wealth as contrasted to valuation of a safe, clean environment" and this model is based on Glew and The Waterloo County Board of Education (1987) and Environmental Ethic (1988).

It is proposed that art therapy needs to work within an "Health Environmental Integration model" (HEI)

(Stineman, 1981) and an environmental ethic (Schuster, 1992), committed to and demonstrating: ecological conscience, a deep ecological role in relation to nature that is underpinned by the values of caring, cooperation and non-violence, and fostering a safe, clean environment. "eARTherapy" (Sibbett, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2009, 2016) offers such a paradigm.

Systems theory is relevant, such as Bronfenbrenner’s (1979, 2005) bioecological model with its nested model of the environmental influences on human development.Perhaps more external systems could be
added also, such as: a Terrasystem
or Gaiasystem -encompassing the world view;the Cosmosystem-encompassing our connection with the universe or cosmos;the Ultrasystem-encompassing that which our material reality is embedded in.This Ultrasystem could parallel the quantum physics concepts developed by Bohm (1995) of the Implicate Order in which the
Explicate Order is enfolded. (Sibbett, )

eARTh-caring values

Green Man (c)CS

As an extension of Dr Schuster's (1990, 1992, 1993) philosophy of nursing care, art therapists and other art and healthcare practitioners are challenged to "expand our definition of caring to include Mother Earth (Schuster, 1990). ... we have a moral obligation to honor earth caring values, not only for our own quality of life and survival but for the well-being of the planet." (Turkel, 2013: 425-426). The practice of art therapy must be committed to "Earth ethics" (McCluney, 1989).

This is also consistent with a systemic perspective on healthcare, in which we are committed to "eARTh-caring values" (Sibbett, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2009, 2016).

"proposes a model of ecological
responsibility in which the self derives its unique, differentiated
identity from its relatedness (connectedness) as a part of the
community of living beings on earth. The self in this model does not
simply act on the world or get acted upon in a mechanistic paradigm, but
rather interacts creatively and dynamically with the world in an ecological, systemic, self-organizing paradigm."

"Far away in the heavenly abode of the great god Indra, there is a wonderful net which has been hung by some cunning artificer in such a manner that it stretches out indefinitely in all directions. In accordance with the extravagant tastes of deities, the artificer has hung a single glittering jewel at the net's every node, and since the net itself is infinite in dimension, the jewels are infinite in number. There hang the jewels, glittering like stars of the first magnitude, a wonderful sight to behold. If we now arbitrarily select one of these jewels for inspection and look closely at it, we will discover that in its polished surface there are reflected all the other jewels in the net, infinite in number. Not only that, but each of the jewels reflected in this one jewel is also reflecting all the other jewels, so that the process of reflection is infinite"The Avatamsaka Sutra of Mahayana Buddhism: Indra's Net. (Cook, 1977).

Thangka painting:Bhutan Kosmos Mandala

Indra's Net. Artwork (c)CS

eARThing the curriculum

Dr Schuster (1993) advocated "greening the curriculum" in nursing. This can be applied to the training of art therapists (and indeed all healthcare and arts practitioners and beyond). There is a need for eARThing the curriculum (Sibbett, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2009, 2016) - ensuring it is consistent with an ecozoic model (Berry, 1992) and infusing learning and teaching with eco-creativity and nature and ensuring that all teaching is
founded in an eco-biopsychosocial model and adheres to eARTth-caring
values. This also means extending learning and teaching into creative and natural contexts, as appropriate.

eARThing research

Similarly, there is a need for a greening / eARThing of research (Sibbett, 1995, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2009, 2016) - infusing it with eco-creativity and nature and ensuring that all research is founded in an eco-biopsychosocial model and adheres to eARTth-caring values.