TECH BRIEFING No 1 http://0-48.ruFrankfurt, 12th October 1984by Capt. Bill Robertson /Astar ParamejgianIt is important to understand what LRH did during the last 20 to 30 years. His main job wasto develop, research and publish the technology. The other things he did, like starting the orgsand doing management and so on, were secondary. That was done as a necessary thing toprotect the technology, and to keep it expanding. But he has stated many times, that whenever things got tough in the world, or if there was a big attack on Scientology, then he wouldalways go back and finish the technical research for the next level, so that this new or laterdevelopments that he would find and put out, would keep people moving up the bridge, andthey would there+ore be better able to confront and handle whatever attacks were being madeagainst Scientology.The last time that I have seen LRH personally, which was in the year 1980, in the fall, he hadjust completed the final technical development and research on the presentation of standardtech by film, by pictures, so it can never be altered by anyone in the future.It is very interesting to note, that those films are no longer available in the church. We aretrying to get copies, but the excuses they give are, that the films show people who aredeclared, and that they are scratched, and some are damaged, and that "we don't use themanymore".Now, anyone of you that knows the HCOPL 17Jun70 "Technical Degrades", will realize thatthis is the technical proof that LRH could not be behind RTC, because he would never haveallowed anything that he developed to give exactly how the TRs and metering should be used,not to be used anymore. We are just talking about the technical side this time. In the years,that I worked with Ron, he explained to me a few times, what his main job in the researchwas. It was basically, he said, like going into a dark room, opening a door into a dark room,and trying to find a door at the other end. Without a light or a guidebook. He said the onlything he would go in with would be an E-Meter. As he would bump into things, or run intodifficulties in the "room" (or level) that he was researching, he would then have to find out,how he could get back to the door and start again with the E-Meter. And finally afterexploring the various ways to get through this area, he would finally find the door at the otherside, and could go into the next level."Now, he said, the bulletins you see written, are the exact path through the room, there aremany other things that could be written, but they are not the direct path through the room."In the C/Sing of a level we find certain remedies and corrections, which help people get backto that path through the room, if they go off into the wrong direction. These are the correctionprograms and so on. You see that in various things like the green form, the resistive casebulletins, and the things handling various types of things on the GF40 and other list actions,and so on. These exact things and some of the remedies, and some of the OT Correctionhandlings, when a case caves in, these are the various ways to get back on to that path.Now we have found out, that after 1980, when Ron did go off the lines (because hedisappeared from the place where he was working at that time in California), that certaintechnical bulletins have appeared, but I happen to know, and so do many other technicalterminals, that in the materials parts are written by LRH. Parts of them. Other parts are notwritten by him, these are parts of his research, they come from his research notes of the past,which he did not want to put into the levels, because they are not the direct path to the door.Alright, this is the reason, that in the Free Zone technical centers there are many Solo NotsCompletions, I think there are 20 to 30 right now, and so far in the church there is only one ormaybe a few more, but they are only promoting, that there is one.We cannot analyze the church s technology anymore by the policy of Scientology, we can onlyanalyze it by the emotion of greed in asking people "pay,pay,pay" for more, to not go throughthe room, but wander around in it for d while until all the money is gone.I hope you understand this. That describes to you, what Ron went through to do the researchto give you the bridge.His work day on the Flag Ship, when I was there for 6 to 7 years, that I observed him workingwas: every day in his whole schedule was approximately eight hours a day devoted to tech andeight hours devoted to handle management, admin and ships affairs. I never saw him work lessthan 16 hours a day in that six years, never saw him get a pay-check for the week of morethan 80 dollars. I do know, that when we were ready to come to America and go off the ship,that if Ron had wanted to take all of the Sea Org reserve monies, which was at that time abouta hundred million dollars (for the Sea Org, for the churches for making buildings andcontinuing expansion, that is what it is for), that if he wanted to go and disappear with all themoney, that we would have said, "OK, fantastic, he has done a fantastic job". But he didn't dothat. He went to America and carried on finishing the NOTs research and OT level research,and doing the films, the technical standard films, knowing already, that there were many, shallwe say people, who in the United States were waiting to attack him and his family. This doesnot sound like the actions of a man who is operating on a basis of just money.The lies spread about LRH are proportional to the overts,that those people, who spread the lies, have done against himand his family.The people, who transmit or relay the lies especially amongst Scientologists, are merelypeople who probably have not made the place on the grade chart, where they are supposed tobe. Because anyone who has gains from Scientology and real wins or abilities, knows Ron spurpose on this planet.His first duty was to help thetans to rehabilitate and go back to their native state, and that itwas in fact a way to become self determined and pan-determined and at cause again.Even the last possibility of a person remaining at effect was covered by LRH in the tech,where he said on the Class 8 course, "the last thing you will have to run out, the last thing, isyour track of auditing, because, you realize, that from the definition of a thetan at cause, thatwhenever he is sitting in an auditing chair, no matter how good the auditing is by the auditor scode, which puts the PC at cause over his case, and helps him, he was still scheduled by theauditor, he was told to pick up the cans, told to start, and to end, and he was under control,though it is a control that is leading him in the direction of getting him free", and Ron said,even that little bit of the person at effect has to be audited.So, auditing is not a trap, Scientology is not a trap, but it can be used as a trap, if the purposeof LRH is not followed.Now to that point I ask you if there are any questions about LRH or anything I have said,because now I tell you next about what we do in Frankfurt.Question from a person at the event: "There are many bulletins after 1980 like data aboutchecking grades processes for reads and that sort of thing, now how do we know where endsthe data?"I covered this point with several tech people in England and America between 1980 and 1982,and it was decided at that point {it is arbitrary of course, but it is a decision and it works), thatwe take the end of 1980, because that is the last time, we can be sure, that LRH was there andreceiving any technical bulletins back and forth for OK, and his approval, and all theseauditors that have audited some 20 years, and when done correctly, have great results with allthe tech from before that, so there seems to be no reason to actually change it.Ron did that continuously, as he would get feed-back. You see, the Flagship was anexperimental place also. Many of us that were on board, were asked, if we would volunteer totake part in research sessions.I might add to that point about the research, I told you before that Ron didn't write thebulletins immediately after getting through the dark room himself, but would make sure thatcases of all types, difficult cases or easy cases, or people that have gone up the bridge this wayand that way, whatever, that old timers, new people, could all receive the same results bygetting PCs and auditors to do it on the Flag Ship. So there was continuously, as they cameout, there was always the way, that every single person could go up the most, perhaps shallwe say, not particularly the easiest, but the most efficient way. It does not mean fast, it meansthe person would be able to confront and handle that, which came next and go up the bridge.Now, on the Class 8 Course he made his point, that it was all conforming to the basics ofScientology, so the only changes you would see in the bulletin after that was, if there wassome pretty large percentage of when they put the tech in the field, that some problems arose,and it wasn't found on the Flag Ship, then there would be a slight revision or something.Now you have to realize, that since 1980 there has been another motive in this, and that is tokeep the person paying for his auditing.As Ron said on the Class 8 Course, there are a million ways to do it wrong and there s onlyone way to do it right, and you can make a million dollars doing a million wrong things andfinally come back to the right one, or you could put them through the correct way the firsttime, and then you can make a lot of OTs.Ron s purpose in the Tech was to get the thetans up to OT, and we can not see this purpose inthe bulletins, that have come up since 1980.The actual additions of various rundowns, and things people must do, some of these aremerely, shall we say, special handlings. They are not major actions. That means, that not everyone on the planet would need a R/D concerning how to better fix an automobile, or how tohandle their 2nd dynamic or something like that, or how to handle their problems with Ethics.Some people would need that, but the others would handle that on their regular bridge.So we have a path, that is very well researched, and very well experimented and very welltaped out, which does result in increased abilities and causativeness, and I have compared thecase levels of people, who have done the bridge before 1980, and the ones who have done itsince with the church, and there is a great difference. It is a difference, which can be measuredin terms of dynamic responsibility, the responsibility in life over the various dynamics, and inthe reality and communications levels of the people involved. I think, you may yourself knowof some of these examples.I have found people in the church doing NOTs auditing, which is now the top level of thereleased bridge, who were afraid to communicate, afraid to find out everything, they kept verylow profiles, they were very effect. This did not seem to me that they were able to cause mucheffects.Another thing that people may be interested in, and this is to finish the answer on the question,is what Ron predicted for Scientology on the PDC tapes of 1952.The PDC Course was an actual OT-Course, it dealt with the thetan s ability to mock up thingsand to make things of his universe and to reduce his being effect of the MEST-Universe(matter, energy, space, time}.He said in those lectures, that Scientology had a short space on earth to flourish and prosperbetween the time that man had gained control over his environment and his machines, wherethey released him for a little more free time to do spiritual things, and before those men withevil purposes would use those machines to enslave you.This apparently has been a repeated history on the track, we see it happening in the world. Healso said, that we must get the tech fully developed and in use, before the "shades of night"fall, and he referred to that as the "Shades of Night" coming down or keeping all ideas andnew developments a secret, so they could be used to control people rather than let them gainmore freedom.You see that today with all these mysterious secrets, that are going behind the scenes, and younever get to hear about what is really developed. All the ideas for a New Civilization forinstance are kept from you, or not let be developed.I think that fully answers, why we put that arbitrary date in there.I also might mention one other thing about the Grade chart, since you are all on it, we are allon it.The grade chart represents the majority of cases at the time it was developed, how they canprogress. However, as a C/S you do not always go by only that, because as you know notevery one is average. You must do the basics of Scientology with each case on an individualbasis, this is the only way you can handle resistive cases or someone that comes, and has justrecently arrived, and is already a Natural Clear, and has no drugs or medicine in this life time.So each is different, there are the extremes, and there is the middle, but no case is exactly likethe others, as no thetan is exactly like the others. In fact you will find, that, if every case wasthe same, all their cognitions and all their answers to the questions on the processes would bethe same, but they are not.The questions are the right ones, the answers are the individual ones from that thetan to gethim through that particular ability level. And if there is something necessary to be done to gethim to that "going up the bridge in the middle", then we must choose the exact thing that willget him there without any problems so he has no difficulty in continuing, which brings me tothe reason why I am giving you this tech briefing.We will be starting now full time 1st or 2nd week in December the moving of all cases in theFrankfurt area that can exchange right up the bridge.Now you ask "why here in Frankfurt ? Because you are supposed to be in Spain?" and all thatstuff. The same thing we are doing in Spain, but I do not speak Spanish and the cases in Spainare all at a level, where they can be handled very easily by a lower class auditor, many havenot had much auditing at all. I have programmed or C/Sed for each of the people there. I havetrained up a Spanish speaking auditor on the DCSI, so we can which ever ones that are cleargoing on up.But also there is a matter of exchange, and there is not much exchange in Spain, the peoplethere do not have any extra money to do anything under the socialist government, and to tellyou the truth, I couldn't survive on just doing tech in Spain. In fact I was not even going to doany tech anywhere, I was depending on David Mayo's and the other AACs to expand quickly,but something a bit upsetting to me has occurred in the last 4-5 months, that is despite all ouradvices to them on policy.Remember what I have told you about policy. It is the 3 dynamic tech, which protects thetechnology. The AACs have actually stated in writing to me, that they do not intend to useEthics, they do not intend to use Policy. I happen to know that persons, that all people willnot go up the bridge without those things in use.If you understand the mechanics of PTSness, when that occurs, it must be handled. It s Ethics,it s an Ethics handling. If you don't have that, it s a roller coaster.Policy and Tech complement each other. But that is not the most upsetting thing, that was thefirst one.The second upsetting thing was, it is allowed and even promoted by Div 6s and Div 2s, - I donot accuse any tech people for this, because I am sure they do the right things with their tech-,but the administrative people and publics of those AACs are permitting extreme criticism ofLRH and repeating of the enemy s stories, that are appearing in the newspapers and werestarted by known SPs, such as Nibs Hubbard-deWolfe, who was Ron s antagonistic son froma former marriage.They have thought it OK to keep promoting the words of Flynn, who is dedicated to destroythe church, Ron de Wolfe, who is dedicated to destroy LRH and Scientology, and I have thatin writing from Ron de Wolfe himself. In a letter he stated, he has been trying to take apartScientology brick by brick for 30 years, and yet it is OK, it s allowed to say, "I think, this isright, LRH was in black magic, and he was taking drugs, and he was doing all this, and heripped off all this money" and they are allowed to say that. They even write that down in theirmagazines and stuff like this.Now I ask you: If this is permitted and they send a person up the bridge, in the future when hegoes out and says "I am a Scientologist", (by the way, they also send out letters stating "Wedo not say we are Scientologists anymore". I have a letter saying that from Harvey Haberfrom the AAC, who is the DIV6 of David Mayo s.), when they say that and go out and say,"Well, I've had my auditing" to someone they are in communication with for business or a jobor just contacts, these people could just turn around and say, "Well, that s very funny, because5 years ago you told me, this guy who founded all this stuff was crazy, black magic, and hewas this and that". To put it mildly and in the most lightly way, they are destroying their ownfuture. It is like a man climbing a rope ladder up the side of a cliff and saying, "Man, the guywho built this ladder, he didn't know what the hell he was doing. The things that hold theropes are all weak, and it s going to fall in any minute." Well, why the hell is he climbing theladder? Why doesn't he just stay down there? It is not understandable.This is why I realized, that they needed a C/S in Frankfurt, I realized also, that many peoplehave been shall we say, a little bit messed about by the old church. I realize, that people arewilling to exchange to have all this handled and go up the bridge standardly. I can also readand speak some German, although I must translate some of it. Also Frankfurt and Germanyare a very key part in the 4th dynamic, which I also take responsibility in my universe forhandling , so that we do not become slaves. So for all of these reasons I decided to actuallystart some very standard going up the bridge for people from any level, because at first it wasgoing to be OT levels, but there are not enough people just there yet. But we will get them allthe way up and then carry them up to the very standard OT abilities.As I say, I can recommend any technical person, that anyone wants to ask on the planet, thatis doing standardly the tech. David Mayo does very standard tech, and so do all the people hetrained.All I am stating here is that the environment, which they are in, tends to make them PTS.Eventually it will stop or hinder or cause them to drop the cause levels or the ability levelsthey have obtained.So it is not the fault of the auditor, it is the fault that they do not have a 3rd dynamic tech inthe org, and the Ethics around it to protect it.Now perhaps you have seen the order that Dorothee wrote with my approval about the drugsceneover at the "Avalon". This is an example of a gradient of ethics being applied and thecorrect policy being used to handle PTSs and giving them a chance to get back on thestandard line. Do you know, that there is no AAC in the world, that I have seen an issue from,that there is no tech delivery center in the world, that I have seen an issue from, to handle anethics situation. They can't confront it. I could handle it as a C/S with them. Because theyhave been hit by incorrect ethics by RTC they backed off from using it totally.To stop using it totally is like a man, who has a wreck with his car, and he never wants todrive again, or like a person, who has had a bad auditing session and they are very hard to getback into session. There are handlings for this.LRH said, the tech could be used to suppress people, Policy can be used, Ethics can be usedwith Policy, but when used correctly, no problems, you go right up the bridge. Actually Iwrote the chapter about Ethics in "What is scientology". I wrote that chapter and sent it toLRH, and he personally OKed it. What was written was put in the book. And in that it states,that Ethics is a technology, and it covers conditions, it covers getting off overts, and secchecks, and covers the PTS/SP phenomena, and boards of investigation and other justiceactions.These are all technical tools, and when used correctly and for the right thing, without the wayRTC is using them, saying "I don't like these findings for the Comm Ev, you find it this way,now go back and do it the way I say", which is totally against policy written on it.You think, why can't people see this. The Convening Authority or authority who calls thecommittee cannot influence the committee, he can only accept the findings or reject them, hecan not tell them what they should be. It is an evaluation, and in fact you don't even need acommittee if you don't follow that policy.And now you find in the writing of RTC itself, they even say "we now declare people at thefinger". They even say this themselves, no comm ev. They will even tell (we have witnessedstatements), they will even tell the person "you can have a committee, but you will loose." Theother thing is, they are mixing the technologies again, they are alter-ising the technology ofethics, they are confusing conditions with justice actions.A justice action is a 3rd dynamic action, when the person cannot get his 1st dynamic ethics inhimself, so he needs the help of the group.Condition formulas are actually the way to expand and flourish and prosper in the universe.They are meant to be applied causatively by the person on an individual basis. If the wrongone is applied, and this is stated in Policies on Ethics on a tape, if the wrong one is applied,the person will fall down the conditions to the one lower. Very exact. This happens all thetime.You notice, how many SP-declares have come out in the last few years, 2000 and more, andfrom the viewpoint of the church all those 2000 fell to the next one lower. If you look at anSP being an enemy - they went to treason and they resigned from the church. It was thewrong condition. Obviously they didn't come up.Ethics is to get the guy up. Some of them went to doubt and did a whole doubt thing, andwhen they did that correctly, back to treason they went again and were gone. Some of themwent down to confusion and remained there, and they didn't want nothing to do with anyone.That is an example of misapplication of ethics. But what we have been doing in OTC WW istrying to make sure, not only the tech survives, but the policy and ethics as well, all thosetechnologies.So in Frankfurt we will find, that we will do it that way. When for instance you hear some onecarrying on and nattering about this and that and the other, it should be reported to ethics, theperson is called in, and HCO justice policies are applied. It s called Manual of Justice whereby finding out, who told you that, and you trace it back to the source, and when you get tothis source, he either agrees to have his overts and withholds pulled on the terminal he iscriticizing or if he doesn't agree, then a justice action is called by the 3rd dynamic to decide,where this person is sitting in relation to the group, like a Comm Ev or what ever.There is no condition formula, which says, criticisms are handled in this condition. That's notthe purpose of the condition formulas. You can't put a person in a condition because he iscritical.The church does this all the time. (Ha, you are critical of us, you must be with the enemy, youare suppressive.) There is not such a thing, the technology for handling criticism is given in thered bulletins also, it comes from O/Ws and M/Wh Technology.It is very easy and everything has a basic and a way to handle it. When you mix these up youget salt in the coffee and sugar on the meat.First of all we will star* this program off by making sure we collect whatever data we have onthe case, or what ever auditing you have had. We can do that with a white form plus a DofPinterview, or you can write it up yourself and we check it with a DofP interview, orsummaries, what you had on the bridge or off the bridge. It is up to the DofP to get thecomplete data now.I m a permanent Class 8 awarded by LRH and I know what to do with a case problem. Youhave to have the data on the case. We get these data together, and before anything else isdone, I look it over as a C/S, and then I make sure, that the next correct action is done, afterwhich the person should be on the bridge. Now that means, he may be on the bridge already,but so far I haven't found anyone that is standardly on the bridge.Some people have had invalidative sec checks, some people have started to go into endlesscorrections, and some people have been programmed to, shall we say, to do actions on theside, which are not necessary to go up the bridge and probably not needed.For instance, a girl asked me in Vienna, "I have this problem of playing before an audience, Im anxious, I m nervous." So she said, "can you handle that?", I said "yes. Well, I m also aC/S. Where are you on the bridge?" "Well, I think, I've done ARC-Straightwire/Life-Repair."She really wanted this handled. Now, if I was interested in just money I would say "sure, itwill take 50 hours, I ll handle it." No. I only want the fair exchange, but I want the best thingfor the PC, so I told her "First go up the bridge. Get your grades. You can do it here, or inLangenthal or what ever, and when you are up the grades it should have been handled. If it isnot, then let me know and we will handle it."She was surprised. I said, "Well, what do you think, the grades are for?" The things like that,that the thetan can obtain, each grade handles the different parts of these things. If you knowthe grade chart, you can see all the abilities that people achieve on those grades. If they reallyachieve that, I don't think she would be nervous after grade IV.Well, if you look at it, it could be a problem in communications, it could be a problem with aproblem, about it she could have O/Ws and be a little nervous about being found out. It s rightthere somewhere, or an ARC break or dramatization of a service fac, it could be anything. So,honestly as a C/S I have to tell her, "you go up the bridge". The church would probably say,"ha, you need a Sunshine Rundown, so you are happy all the time." 50 hours of that, that s avery high price. So you see, this is what we want to get back, the intention of LRH indeveloping the Tech, and in addition to the intentions of LRH, we want to get back in, (I sayget back in because it is not there now), the recognition of source, because there are peoplenow in England going around and saying that, "Ron didn't develop the tech", and they aresaying, "John McMasters developed it", and other people like David Mayo, and some of theClass 10s, "Otto Roos developed the Tech".How soon they forgot, that I was there on the Flag Ship for 7 years, when he, LRH,developed everything.From the Class 8 Course all the way through NED for OTs, starting with the NED course, allthe tech in between and including the Ext/Int-Rd and the Drug-Rundown, OT DrugRundowns and everything was developed right in that period.As the captain of the ship I made a tour of the ship many times a day, and I saw him at theoffice, working on the Tech 8 hours a day. I didn't see any of those other guys doing it.So it s very strange to me, that these stories can be circulating amongst Scientologists, that sas silly as me saying, that since I was used on a pilot process or an experimental process ofsome of the L s, (you know, the Ls, L10, L11, L12). I was given some of those on the FlagShip, as an experiment. But its like me going around saying "I helped develop the Ls." I didn'tdo any of the research on the L s, I was a PC or a PreOT.You see the difference. And even then, I mean, that people would believe this, it shows me,that we are on the correct path only here in Frankfurt, and in Spain, or where ever we areputting the OTC WW. Because, as I said, the other areas are becoming more and moreincreasingly (as they are not getting their overts pulled), they are getting more and morecritical, and spreading these rumors and so on like that. They are false.OK. That s my viewpoint and I hope you like it. But I think, what you are being given, if Imay look at it now from another viewpoint, what we are doing here is actually also a pilotprocess in Frankfurt, right, and as a result of this you may be the first people to be able topromote the results of the most standard bridge since LRH was actually running FCCIs atFlag, that s Flag Case Completion Intensives on the Flag Ship, and he was C/Sing all of theircases.So, next year we can start over here the Universal Church of Scientology somewhere inEurope, where all the training and auditing, that has been lost, all of his training, all the Policy,all the Ethics, all the Tech come back in.Because that has not been duplicated yet, I consider I ll take the responsibility to start that andhelp start that, because no one else, again, is doing it.I also like to state, that when you get to your OT levels and so on, that my main experience inmissionairing in Tech was to be the Commanding Officer in most of the AOs on the planet.I've been the Commanding Officer for the AO at Alicante, which was the first one on land,and the one in Edinburgh, which was the first AO in England, and the first one in California,which was the AO L.A., and on other missions I have run for a while the AO in Copenhagen.And believe me, I know everything, that can happen with an OT case.Before those jobs I was in the Advanced Org on the Flag Ship on the following posts: TechSec, Qual Sec, Dir of Review, and the Review Auditor for all OT cases.And before that, when the Sea Org just started in 1967, I was the I/C of Review, and thatincluded sec checking, included all of the review actions on all the persons in the original SeaProject. Before that I was Senior Lead Review Auditor at SH England, and Director ofReview Qual Division, and before that HGC auditor and also Class 7 Intern, which is PowerProcessing Auditor.So I have a lot of technical qualifications on my track for handling these types of cases, and Ican say in truth that the AOs were never run better by anyone else except of course LRH.I m not bragging about that, I m just telling you that, because I've duplicated, what LRHwants. And most people, that have been to those AOs and have been through them, whenother people were running them later, will tell you the same thing.The reason they tell you that is because when ever I went to correct an AO later, the firstpeople who would come to me, would be the old timers who had been there earlier, youknow, and gone up the bridge, and they would say, "I m glad you are back. Now I want totell you something." "OK," I said, "go ahead and tell me because I m here on mission, tohandle whatever it is." And they say, "We can't promote for people to come here anymore,they just don't do it right anymore."These were the most influential and wealthy and the most known public, and I would pull thestring and get the data, and I would find that who ever was running it, he had gone into theidea, "We are just going to make the money, we are just going to sell Power processing andsomething or other and we are not going to get them up the bridge."One place in one time in Copenhagen I even found they had a C/S, that was blackmailing PCs.I declared him and I'll even let you know the name, because I don't want him ever again inScientology. That was Belkacem Feradj, French Algerian, he is maybe not known in Germany,but he was at the AO in the 70s, he is now in the US. Anyway, that is probably the mostbetrayal, I think, to do to LRH, that someone could blackmail a PC, find out about W/Hsfrom the government or his W/Hs on wife or whatever and then say, "If you don't give me thismoney, I will tell."Now, that is about the most betrayal that I have run across on the tech lines.But these Guys, that are going around criticizing LRH, if they keep going like that, they mayreach No.1 position in betrayal.We have tried as OTC, and my friends tried, Maria has gone over to the US, Hermanns inSwitzerland have gone there, John Caban has gone over there, and every time we broughtthem the same message."Hey, knock off this criticism and this Bla Bla Bla about LRH, and pull their overts andwithholds, and trace it down to the source and expose, who is doing it." They won't do it.Anyway, it s time now to create the alternative for thealternative, OK ?I ask you, if you want to help in this. I m going to do C/Sing and so on, and in special cases Imight even do some Review Handlings, because there are some people I understand have beenscrewed up, messed up on the OT levels, that requires this type of AO review auditinghandling, which I can do and get everyone back on the bridge and on up through OT. We doneed more OT s as LRH always says. Real ones.Because, shall we say, he is feeling a little lonely. He has left the bridge here for us. He iswaiting there to say "Hello!. Glad you could make it!"So, anyway, that s what the plan is, and I would like now to know any questions you haveabout this, before the tape runs out.Oh yes, one other thing. My rate as a permanent Class 8 as C/S is DM 300.- per hour.Maria is going to do the DofP stuff, DofP interviews and also operate as what you call a techpage, getting the folders together and doing all the things, she knows the whole line, she hasworked at Flag and in AOs and so on.Now I want you to realize something, right ? Marianne is going to continue auditing and sowill Franz and anyone else.Like that I hope we will get the whole thing together and just start a flow, that will be filled byall around Europe. We will have to train people and get them out and just bring the wholelevel of technology up.Also I want to point out that DM 300.- an hour C/Sing once the person is on the bridge right,really on the line, and when I know what is happening in every session, then it is not necessaryto have the Senior C/S, (I m calling it Senior C/Sing). Anyone that is trained to run thoselevels can probably just C/S the next steps on the thing. Like you have run OA on thecommunication thing, the next thing you run is OB. So when you went standardly on OA yougo on to OB.So I m sure Marianne can handle that, or Franz, or any person. What I m trying to do is oncegetting the person by making sure that he his totally right on the bridge without any BPC,picking them up again at the point where they go into the Solo-Assists and then giving themthe C/Sing from there all the way to OTIII. And I ll even state here, that anyone that wants togo on the old OTIV,V, and VI, we have those materials as well. But that is only once theyhave finished OTIII, then they can sort of communicate back and forth in writing to the C/Sand we will see, if that is the best line. But by that I think I ll probably have done my NOTstraining as an auditor and C/S, so I can carry on with that. If not, there is always Per Schiottzin Copenhagen, so we will work the whole bridge.Please address any communication, if you have anybody interested for this, to Maria. She willbe keeping the logbooks of who has paid for what. So we can give the service on the basis ofpolicy, you know, the service to the people, that have given exchange and buy the preferencerates, and so on.Also the C/Sing does not take as long afterwards as it does in the beginning, because in thebeginning you have to work with little data from the DofP and the White Form, you have toguess at what all is in the folders that the church is holding, and you have to pick out whatBPC they have missed and handle those and make it so, that the person is ready to go.When you have them going already it is very easy and may take 5-10 minutes to do the C/S. Ifthere is a little bit of trouble it doesn't take very long, because you have already done thebasics.So out of DM 300,- we say that DM 150,- is half hour and DM 75,- is 15 minutes and if it is afast thing, 5 to 10 minutes it s DM 50,-. So that way everybody can have their folder C/Sed byme if they want, if they don't wish to, they can just have the beginning done and will then begiven on to their regular tech lines, and after they get to the Solo Assists, then I ll take it onfrom there.Now, for the auditors here, the people that are tech people, I will tell you one other thing.Here, we are applying the policy of Qual. OKs to audit and OKs to the C/S etc., etc. areobtained in Qual. And this is how all tech got started on the Flag Ship. That s why I m usingthis, because we do not have a training course, where we can train a whole bunch of C/Ses.We will have in the future, but until then, if there is something you want to C/S and you havethe qualifications as an auditor there, well, then you bring the bulletins, you study the packand so on, and as Qual Terminal I ll give you checkouts and meter checkouts, everything onthat pack, and give you the OK to do it.That is how it was done originally in the Sea Org. You check out, you show me thechecksheet, you've twinned, or where ever you have done the whole check outs and so on.Like a tech training thing on it, on the exact thing you want to do, like you want to be able toC/S or audit on the DCSI. Well then you do the Pack, Bla,Bla,Bla, bring it here, I give you anexam, give you a check-out and so on.Well, I think that is about the end unless there is any other question.To end off, that is the purpose of this. It is to put in the bridge like LRH originally intended.The alternative to the alternative, that will bring Europe again into a position where LRHstated in 1966 "Europe must be ready, in case the United States go down the drain, to takeover the entire responsibility for Scientology in the world."I think it is time again to do this.