zycamaniac: When they couldn't produce an amazing looking sample shot, I'd say this most likely is going to be a dud... Just like a lot of the older Live-MOS Olympic cameras' sample shot, showing significant shadow noise at 200ISO...

This one have sample shot that showed barely any detail, the image looked barely in focus...

When they introduced their first prototype as that MIT wonder camera, I'm interested, but the resolution is too low...

When they introduced their first production camera, I'm interested, but as before, the resolution is too low. The styling they are so proud of is looking a lot more like security camera than anything else, and the software, well, it was a MacOS only affair, and I don't like Apple... So that's a no go even if all other criteria fit my need.

Now this monstrosity is here, I'd say it is a no go again, the spec too low, the price too high...

However, I do encourage everyone with money burning a hole in their pocket get one, or even more than one. That's how they can kept development going, and how I'll be able to get a camera that will work for me in 10 years time... The concept is good, the execution and tech need some work, and I encourage everyone to fund further effort, I'll be back for the fruit of the effort in 10 years. :)

When they couldn't produce an amazing looking sample shot, I'd say this most likely is going to be a dud... Just like a lot of the older Live-MOS Olympic cameras' sample shot, showing significant shadow noise at 200ISO...

This one have sample shot that showed barely any detail, the image looked barely in focus...

When they introduced their first prototype as that MIT wonder camera, I'm interested, but the resolution is too low...

When they introduced their first production camera, I'm interested, but as before, the resolution is too low. The styling they are so proud of is looking a lot more like security camera than anything else, and the software, well, it was a MacOS only affair, and I don't like Apple... So that's a no go even if all other criteria fit my need.

Now this monstrosity is here, I'd say it is a no go again, the spec too low, the price too high...

rfsIII: What they're not telling you is that "organic" is just another word for "carbon-based life form." Bottom line: this sensor is alive; it's a creature that was either discovered or genetically engineered to live inside your camera and translate photons into images (remember the bird that lived inside Fred Flintstone's camera and chiseled pictures onto stone tablets? Same principle, different species). Nobody tell PETA or they'll put the kibosh on the whole thing.

Monster slime will ooze out of your camera if you do not regularly worship it. DO NOT WIPE SENSOR WITH HOLY WATER!!!

KHemmelman: I don't do street photography because I don't want the hassle of dealing with complete strangers who are most likely going to be suspicious of me and not want to sign a model release. I suspect this guy is the same way, so he took the easy way out and does it secretly without permission or approval. Basically a roving peeping-tom. I have to say, what he is doing is a real "cheap shot". (no pun intended)

Well said. Legal laws define the absolutely lowest standard, they define guilty or not. You can be an absolute anus and still be legal.

But it is nice to see a lot of people prefer to stay out of the anushole category by their own free will, instead of under legal threats.

KHemmelman: I don't do street photography because I don't want the hassle of dealing with complete strangers who are most likely going to be suspicious of me and not want to sign a model release. I suspect this guy is the same way, so he took the easy way out and does it secretly without permission or approval. Basically a roving peeping-tom. I have to say, what he is doing is a real "cheap shot". (no pun intended)

Why, because you've been screamed at for taking photos without asking?

Or did you tried to blind them first with a few well aimed studio strobes?

KHemmelman: I don't do street photography because I don't want the hassle of dealing with complete strangers who are most likely going to be suspicious of me and not want to sign a model release. I suspect this guy is the same way, so he took the easy way out and does it secretly without permission or approval. Basically a roving peeping-tom. I have to say, what he is doing is a real "cheap shot". (no pun intended)

And if the shot is flattering with polite request, I think a lot of people would be glad to give the permission.

If not, it's their face, it's their body, who are we to force them to be in our pictures?