Having a background in sociology, philosophy, and economics, I'm going to try to give this blog a pretty broad scope. Going from finance and economics, to geopolitics and world news, to the occasional academic or theoretical post.
I was born in Buenos Aires, Argentina and live in New York, so we'll try to add that into it as well.
Even though I like Adam Smith, don't be surprised if a little Marx makes its way in there as well.
Follow me at @agufonte

How And When Greece Will Leave The Euro; New Drachma To Slide 50%

The Greek leader of the Radical Left (Syriza) coalition, Alexis Tsipras, arrives at parliament in Athens on May 8, 2012, the future of the EU may be in his hands - Image credit: AFP/Getty Images via @daylife

With the tide turning against a Greek unity government that will respect prior agreements with the troika, the possibility of a Eurozone breakup is no longer just an academic possibility. The consensus is gradually accepting a Greek exit as a likely scenario: external funding could dry up, severely constraining the supply of euros and leading to the adoption of a new currency. According to Nomura, these neo-drachmas would face a 50% to 60% depreciation, while the euro would tank, falling to 1.15 to 1.20 against the U.S. dollar. This is why it could happen, and how it would go down.

The cards are stacked against the least dangerous scenario, Greek permanence in the European Monetary Union. Rising Greek political star Alexis Tsipras, head of the far-left Syriza party, has walked out on talks to form a unity government with the more moderate PASOK and New Democracy parties.

The looming prospect of a new round of elections suggest the left could take over, forming a coalition government, headed by Syriza, which would seek to renegotiate what Tsipras has called the “barbaric” bailout agreement. Recent polls, cited by both Dennis Gartman and Nomura’s Jens Nordvig, indicate a rising possibility of this. Nordvig explains the repercussions of this:

In our opinion, there is little desire within the Troika (ECB, EC and the IMF) to renegotiate. Certain symbolic concessions are feasible, but that is probably it. As such, it will be hard to reach a compromise, and we could see a breakdown in cooperation between Greece and its European/international partners in the months following the second round of the election.

In practical terms, this means Greece would run out of money in a few months. On the one hand, the Greek government would lose access to EFSF and IMF funding, making it difficult to meet debt payments. At the same time, the Greek banking system would find itself euro-strapped as the Greek National Bank halts its special liquidity program (ELA assistance, approved by the ECB). The implications of this latter point are massive:

Terminating this special liquidity support may sound like a technicality, but it is not. Turning off such assistance would imply that Greek banks would lose access to much-needed euro funding, which would leave them no longer able to provide euro liquidity to the general public domestically. This type of separation of balances in Greek banks from balances within other eurozone banks would lead ‘Greek euros’ to trade at a discount to ‘normal euros’ and would effectively amount to the adoption of a new national currency.

If indeed negotiations breakdown and Greece stops cooperating with the troika, then this scenario would play out around July or August, when the next quarterly disbursement is set to be made. Capital flight and domestic bank runs would probably ensue, as the government moves to pass new laws formalizing the redenomination of contracts. “New notes and coins would have to be created and introduced to formalize the shift from euros into a new Greek currency for cash transactions,” noted Nordvig, adding that it would be a speedy process as households hoard euros, which would then become more of a store of value than a currency used for daily transactions.

What does this mean for Greece? A simplistic analysis (based on a metric of current overvaluation of national real exchange rates and a measure of future inflation risk in Greece) suggest the new-drachmas would depreciate about 50% to 60%, according to Nordvig. The banking system will probably collapse, according to data from UBS, as funding costs surge, and companies become unable to finance daily operations. Initially, Greece would be mired in chaos, much like Argentina was once it broke the U.S. dollar peg in late 2001.

The Hellenic Republic will most probably default on various debt obligations (“primarily toward official creditors”), having significant spillover effects, both internally and across the monetary union. While Germany has been active lately trying to assure markets the EU can handle a Greek exit, the shock waves would definitely rattle the foundations of the financial system. Instability would push up the current, elevated, risk premium on Eurozone assets, causing “additional deterioration in external capital flows.”

One could assume that the U.S. dollar would be favored by a Greek euro exit, as investors flock to safety. While Nomura’s current Q3 estimate for the euro sits at $1.25, a breakup scenario could push that down to the 1.15 to 1.20 range. Gold, which should benefit from safe haven flows, would have to face a higher dollar, though, making its move uncertain.

The situation in Europe is dire indeed, with Greece teetering on the edge of default and Spain falling prey to the dreaded bond vigilantes. Germany has managed to keep the monetary union alive, but might have to deal with the first casualty over the next few months. No matter what happens, investors should be prepared for extreme market tension in the EU going forward.

Post Your Comment

Post Your Reply

Forbes writers have the ability to call out member comments they find particularly interesting. Called-out comments are highlighted across the Forbes network. You'll be notified if your comment is called out.

Comments

Those parasitic communist/socialist deserve the national bankruptcy which will follow. You cannot eat your substance (body) and expect to substain life. Living for today, inflated wages, too many government employees, excessive benefits, cheating on taxes, antibusiness regulations, borrowing to fund today with no care for tomorrow. Greece has fallen so far since the Romans conquered them. How much further can they fall? Of course, the Romans are not very far behind in this race to the bottom.

Justice, while I agree that Greece is to blame for many of their own problems, you cannot forget that the core countries of the Eurozone (primarily Germany) benefited from offering the Greeks artificially low borrowing costs. Most German products are sold into the Eurozone, so for all their hard work, the Germans did give an unreliable nation (look at its economic history) a blank check, and expected them to manage it professionally. You don’t give a drug addict a bottle of painkillers after some medical procedure and expect him not to exceed his dose.

The analogy to a drug addit is appropriate not only to Greece, Portugal, Italy, Spain and now France. The French were probably the main pushers for the Euro Union and the Euro as it’s primary currancy. Now when they need to be frugal and feel a little pain, they want to op out. I have no symphony for any of Europeans. They brought it upon themselves. The problem is that the liberals here want to followed them into economic disaster. I say no further aid to Europe, we bailed them out more than once and provided defense to them at our own expense only to be stabbed in the back by France and some of the others. Let them stand for fail on their own.

The analogy is completely valid: Southern European nations like Greece and Spain took advantage of very low borrowing costs, provided by their “monetary union” with Germany and other Northern European countries, to finance spending sprees that weren’t backed by output production that justified them.

Northern European nations took advantage of Southern European nations’ spending sprees to sell their goods to them (they also benefited from giving the Southern European nations stronger currencies, allowing them to buy more).

But, as economic history shows, Southern Europe is economically volatile and hasn’t been able to maintain its currencies and economies on stable footing. So, giving them cheap money and asking them to be responsible is akin to giving a compulsive gambler more money and asking him not to bet on it.

Do not forget the Greek people, the vast majority of which has been brought to their knees because of the sclerotic, and corrupt government you mention. It is those in the higher echelons rubbing shoulders with the likes of Goldman Sachs who are ultimately responsible for this mess. Do some research and you will see that the master plan has been devised, and the desired result is to destroy the people, and their ethnicity, not to mention, to find the justification to strip them of their natural resources. It will soon become common knowledge, that the chief country calling the shots in Europe, you know who you are, is in debt to the tune of trillions. The recent reneging on separating bank debt from state debt says it all… because if that happened, we would know who in fact is the offender here.

Ha! Good point. The fear, though, is that if Greece happens to leave, it will cause further financial instability within the Eurozone. Banks will be afraid to lend to each other as people begin to doubt Ireland, Portugal, and ultimately Spain and Italy’s capacity to keep on paying their debts. Banks stop lending to each other and borrowing costs rise, etc etc. Risk premia, at the end of the day, goes up for everyone.