04Jul16

Intercepting ICBMs: Impossible is impossible

The news about the deployment of the US missile defense system in Europe has
generated many rumors and discussions. How can one intercept a
nuclear-capable ballistic missile that comes down on your head from space?

Russian Deputy Defense Minister, Colonel-General Oleg Ostapenko, has recently
said that Russia was developing new weapons to counter missile warheads of a
potential enemy. According to him, the weapons would be able to replace the
Moscow missile defense system and significantly complement the defense of the
rest of the country.

The official obviously spoke about S-500 missile systems and the modernization
of the Moscow missile defense system A-235. However, one may also assume
that Russia is building a "missile umbrella", not only around Moscow, but also on
many important sites in the rest of the Russian Federation.

Technically, it goes about the weapon that launches 40,000 bomblets in the
direction of the target at a speed of up to 1,800 meters per second. A shot like
that thus creates a "cloud of iron" at an altitude near the target. If a warhead
finds itself in such a cloud, it will be destroyed immediately. The new weapon is
believed to protect strategically important sites: silos for ballistic missiles,
command and control centers and communications hubs.

This brings up the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty from May 26, 1972. The treaty was
signed in Moscow by General Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee Leonid
Brezhnev and US President Richard Nixon. The agreement came into force on
October 3, 1972. The treaty was concluded for an indefinite people of time, and
any party could pull out from it unilaterally. In accordance with the ABM Treaty,
the USSR and the United States undertook to have only two missile complexes
on their territories, each 150 km large, with not more than 100 launchers. In July
1974, the parties signed an additional protocol to the agreement, according to
which they could have only one such area: either around the capital or near
ICBM silos. The USSR thus protected Moscow, and the United States the Grand
Forks area. However, in 2002, the United States chose to withdraw from the
treaty and it ceased to function as a bilateral agreement.

The organization of air defense is a highly complicated technological endeavor.
Modern ballistic missiles carry not only one, but multiple warheads. There are
also decoys that send false, but real-like signals to radar stations. There are light
and heavy targets, but even a heavy target can be false. Missiles can often be
equipped with jamming systems and a technology that makes them highly
maneuverable. In short, it is easier to kill a bird with two stones than to intercept
an ICBM on the way to its target.

In addition, the strategic missile defense, even though it is called strategic, was
originally designed to defend only against a restricted ballistic missile attack. A
strategic missile defense system cannot intercept all missiles that Russia and the
USA have. In the future, it will be impossible to intercept all enemy missiles too,
including with the help of US missile defenses in Europe.

There are several types of ballistic missiles interception. It can be possible to
intercept a missile shortly after takeoff, as it is rapidly gaining altitude. Guiding
an interceptor missile at such a conspicuous and easily vulnerable target is not
too challenging. This is advantageous as well, because the destruction of the
missile leads to the destruction of all its warheads and decoys. However, the
ramp-up time of a missile only takes 60-110 seconds. This is the time, during
which an interceptor is supposed to track down the target and destroy it.

One must also understand that ballistic missiles are usually launched from inland
territories and are reliably protected. It goes without saying that it is impossible
to deploy interceptor missiles somewhere near.

The US used to intimidate the Soviet leadership with an opportunity to deploy
interceptors in space to be able to shoot down missiles during takeoff. It goes
about the infamous Strategic Defensive Initiative system that was to combine
ground-based units and orbital deployment platforms to protect the USA from
missile attacks. All the nuclear and chemical lasers have never materialized. Even
if the Americans had built such a system, they would not have been able to
deliver all of its components into space. To accomplish the goal, the USA would
have had to send 400-600 space shuttles into orbit. One such shuttle used to
make a 400-km wide hole in the ozone layer. Thus, the launch la off shuttles
would have destroyed the ozone layer of the planet entirely.

One can intercept a missile halfway, outside the Earth's atmosphere, where all
the warheads have separated from the missile and fly to the targets by inertia.
This option gives more time - from 20 to 40 minutes, so that this method is
preferable. Yet, warheads are small and they do not serve as a source of
radiation. How can one determine which one of them is combat and which one is
false?

Thus, it just so happens that the missiles deployed along Russia's western
borders may technically intercept Russian missiles over the UK, France and the
Atlantic Ocean at best.

Finally, it is possible to intercept warheads above one's now territory, as they are
already on the way towards the target. The effectiveness of radar tracking
systems increases for this option, and interceptor missiles are cheaper. Yet, the
interception time is limited to less than one minute. Last but bot least, if one
warhead hits the target, all the efforts for intercepting others will be wasted.

[Source: By Vyacheslav Shpakovsky, Pravda, Moscow, 04Jul16]

This document has been published on 12Jul16 by the Equipo Nizkor and Derechos Human Rights. In accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a
prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes.