>First footage of #Syrian rebel underground fortress, under the National Hospital in #Douma. #Syria's government forces are uncovering weapons caches, underground artillery and workshops in the hospital as well as a massive tunnel for multi-ton trucks

If the evidence would come out two days after the attacks, this would have an impact. Usually, the lies are found out years later, at which point nobody gives a fuck anymore and the administration has changed anyway.

>Moscow has “irrefutable proof” that the alleged chemical incident in Syria’s Douma was a “false-flag attack,” orchestrated by UK security services with support from the United States, the Russian envoy to the OPCW said.

“We have not just a ‘high level of confidence,’ as our Western partners uniformly put it; we have irrefutable proof that there was no chemical attack in Douma on April 7,” Russia’s Ambassador to the Organization for the Prohibition of the Chemical Weapons Aleksandr Shulgin said at a special meeting of the UN chemical watchdog’s executive council. The diplomat added that the incident had been a “pre-planned false-flag attack by the British security services, which could have also been aided by their allies in Washington.”

How is Russia going to act on this information, if it is so irrefutable? It would be a violation of international law, faith, and diplomacy of a very grave character, as the guy in the article said. They should be fuming. If it was true, what will they do? So far, it's release a statement.