This thread is starting to get completely pointless, as everyone seems to run whatever settings they want instead of the ones in the OP

Click to expand...

I am so sorry if i have dissapointed you, Pease accept my heartfet appology, Unfortununatley my primary monitor is incapable of the display settings outlined in the post dictating the thread criteria. I was hoping that other forum members could find it in thier hearts to forgive my crimes against the thread and help me to improve my bench scores regardless of my wanton disregard and hardware that is incapable of the settingsof wich one parameter was afowl.
Sorry if my actoins were misconstrued as disrespect, I will make every effort to avoid such mistakes in the future.

I am so sorry if i have dissapointed you, Pease accept my heartfet appology, Unfortununatley my primary monitor is incapable of the display settings outlined in the post dictating the thread criteria. I was hoping that other forum members could find it in thier hearts to forgive my crimes against the thread and help me to improve my bench scores regardless of my wanton disregard and hardware that is incapable of the settingsof wich one parameter was afowl.
Sorry if my actoins were misconstrued as disrespect, I will make every effort to avoid such mistakes in the future.

Kind regards,
Craig0.

Click to expand...

lol'd
But seriously.. if your screen had a lower res than 1920x1080, I could understand that you can't run it at that res, but you have a 1920x1200 LCD. It would work fine if set to 1920x1080.. just not look perfect (either stretched or with borders.. depends on how "intelligent" the LCD is)

lol'd
But seriously.. if your screen had a lower res than 1920x1080, I could understand that you can't run it at that res, but you have a 1920x1200 LCD. It would work fine if set to 1920x1080.. just not look perfect (either stretched or with borders.. depends on how "intelligent" the LCD is)

Click to expand...

But then I could not honor the '"Fullscreen" setting.
So you see my friend it's a rock and a hard place for me to try and conform to the thread standards.
Being that i game at the native 16:10 resolution of my screen and always in "fullscreen" mode
I figuered that it would be best to maintain the native resolution of my monitor.
Once again sorry if my disregard for the benchmark settings defined in the first post ruined your TPU experience.

But then I could not honor the '"Fullscreen" setting.
So you see my friend it's a rock and a hard place for me to try and conform to the thread standards.
Being that i game at the native 16:10 resolution of my screen and always in "fullscreen" mode
I figuered that it would be best to maintain the native resolution of my monitor.
Once again sorry if my disregard for the benchmark settings defined in the first post ruined your TPU experience.

Click to expand...

It will honor the full screen setting.

By setting fullscreen 1920x1080 in the heaven benchmark and NOT windows, It will run the bench at full screen but 1920x1080 and not effecting your monitor resolution in windows.

I'll post up some scores of my ancient rig tomorrow when I get home, looking to order either a 7950 7870 or a 580 soon was hoping for some price drops first and still can't decide even with these benchmarks seems the 580 does well and is quite a bit cheaper then 79xx cards

i7920 @ 3.7 4890 in crossfire stock clocks 6gb tri channel ram blah blah blah old system still decent fps now the question is to upgrade to a 580, or a 7870 or a 7950 i cant run the ops resolution so picked one as close as possible

BrettRuthnam u still score a little more than me, and i run my i5-2500k at 3,7ghz / memory 933,5mhz, it have run that almost every since i got my Gene-Z/Gen3 back from rma. my GTX 570 is clocked at 797/975/1594 and i get this: