Anglobitch

The Anglobitch Thesis contends that the brand of feminism that arose in the Anglosphere (the English-speaking world) in the 1960s has an ulterior misandrist (anti-male) agenda quite distinct from its self-proclaimed role as ‘liberator’ of women.

Friday, 10 April 2015

Some of the
funniest, most incisive writings on Anglo-American men’s issues can be found on
the SlutHate forum (replacement for the ill-fated PUA Hate). These comments on
the Blue Pill Nonsense Parents Tell
their Kids show real insight:

"Stop worrying
about girls and they will be more attracted to you"

“Females will flock
to you when you get a good education and a stable job!”

"Money can't
buy you love"

"There's
someone for everyone"
"You'll find that special girl soon"

“Just be yourself”
“Looks don't really matter”

All well and good.
But what the radicalized manosphere calls ‘Blue Pill Nonsense’ is really better described as Sexual
False Consciousness. The latter concept has much greater depth and explanatory
power because it is rooted in a long-standing body of discourse originating in
the 19th century, not something recently devised to cope with the vagaries of
female mate-choice.

What is false consciousness? For Karl
Marx, false consciousness denoted the widespread tendency for low-status,
exploited people to ‘buy into’ the values/ideology of the ruling elite. Of
course, the elite use all their power to maintain false consciousness –
compulsory state education and the mainstream media represent the two potent
mechanisms of mass indoctrination. Not, of course, that Marxism is
a viable philosophy; only in this narrow area has it value or significance.

Noam Chomsky has applied the
concept to modern America, showing how the Anglo-American media ‘manufacture’
consent for foreign wars, coercive policing and other abuses. The Italian
neo-Marxist Antonio Gramsci pushed the concept of false consciousness in
another, more abstract direction: he argued that advanced societies were forged
from ideological ‘cement’ called ’hegemony’. Consisting of language, laws,
conventions and customs, hegemony represents ‘common sense’ at any given moment.
Of course, national hegemony is subject to continual revision: in 50s America,
marriage and heterosexuality was immutablenorms, not mere lifestyle choices.
And while provisional acceptance of a given hegemony represents a certain
degree of false consciousness, coercion of the masses can never be total.

The manosphere has a specific
interest in defining gender relations in Red Pill/Blue Pill terms, of course.
However, even this development is not entirely new. The British crime writer Colin
Wilson developed the concept of ‘sexual disenfranchisement’ several decades before
the Manosphere even existed. He argued that men have traditionally displayed
status via wealth, power or even spiritual standing. However, in the modern era
they principally display their status via sexual conquests of the young and
beautiful. In short, the American Dream has become the American Sexual Dream. Consequently,
the nature of revolt has changed. When wealth was the principal source of
social status, revolutionaries like Che Guevara clamored for economic equality.
However, now sex is the chief marker of social status, revolutionaries see the equalization
of sexual resources (typically young women) as their main goal (PUAs are a good
example of this trend).

Young Women: the Glittering Prizes of Post-Modern Society

Hence, in the modern era
‘sexually disenfranchised’ men are the principal revolutionary force in
advanced industrial nations.According
to Wilson, sex criminals are males who have seen through the hegemonic smoke
screens erected by the mainstream media; and, having realized their sexual
exclusion, set about remedying it via sex crime (or, more recently, game). In other words, they
have rejected the Blue Pill of sexual false consciousness for the Red Pill of strenuous resistance. Wilson calls this
process of realization ‘switching on the dark’.

Redefining the MRA Blue Pill as
sexual false consciousness greatly expands its explanatory power.The Manosphere is no mere collection of incel
misfits – it is a counter-hegemonic movement. Males such as Elliott Rodger or
Cho Hui Seung were not mere psychotics – before death, they achieved a certain
insight into their sexually disenfranchised condition. And the Anglosphere's myth of universal sexual
liberation/bounty is no mere chimera – it is a contrived hegemonic narrative
maintained by the elite to nullify the male masses.

And so on.

Sexual false consciousness is the
erotic expression of the American Dream and it serves the same purpose in
neutralizing the masses as its economic counterpart. Low income Americans vote Republican because they
spuriously believe they are only ‘temporarily’ poor; that someday, despite all
evidence to the contrary, they can be rich. Like the American Dream, SFC encounters
little resistance because most American males have bought into the delusion they
can achieve it. And because the sexual rewards for success are so alluring (and
the price of failureso catastrophic), they cannot accept that most of them will
never have sex with actresses, models and other attractive women. Like the blue-collar schlubs who seriously think they have a
chance with models and actresses, the average American male would sooner wallow
in delusions of sexual success than accept his incel/landwhale-fuckingreality.

Blue Collar Imbeciles Wallowing in SFC

The dream of sexual success hangs
before every American man like a shimmering mirage, binding his consent to
elite narratives even as he studies and toils. In fact, SFC is now the true
opiate of the male masses; their primary existential motivation.

Interestingly, Philip K Dick saw
his sci fi novels as metaphors for false consciousness and counter-hegemonic
resistance. The Pill trope had its first cinematic outing in
Total Recall, a film inspired by one of Dick’s short stories. In short, the
Blue Pill and sexual false consciousness have always been one and the same.