"fom" <fomJUNK@nyms.net> wrote in message news:1ZudnajAj7TF09fMnZ2dnUVZ_vydnZ2d@giganews.com...> On 3/20/2013 4:36 PM, AMeiwes wrote:>> "fom" <fomJUNK@nyms.net> wrote in message>> news:wIydnYEnbJNc-dTMnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@giganews.com...>>>>>> In the post,>>>>>> news://news.giganews.com:119/ce55c74c-8c92-44d2-8e96-86e487e1549e@y9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>>>>>> WM has made the remarks,>>>>>> "This is deplorable because mathematic>>> like no other part of "arts"depends on>>> physics.">>>> wrong => math is not art. physics depends on math.>>>> In fairness, the reference to "art" here involves the> distinction between the convocation of Masters of Arts> degrees and Masters of Science degrees in the system> of higher education. That, however, is irrelevant to> what is meant in relation to the relative logical> priority between mathematics and physics.>

..... so what does "relevant relative logical priority" actually mean?

>>>>> "Reality is the ultimate arbiter since>>> mathematics has been abstracted from>>> reality.">>>> circular thinking since one is thinking in circles.>>>> I, personally, have no problem with circularity.> At issue, however, is the correctness of its application,> and "thinking in circles" is disqualified.>