Travis Oliphant wrote:
>> It is somewhat workable as it stands, but I think it would be nicer if
> we could have some "meta" operator that allowed an alternative
> definition of major operators. Something like @* for example (just
> picking a character that is already used for decorators).
>> I wonder if we should propose such a thing for Python 3000.
>
It wouldn't hurt. I think 'characters' in Py3K will be Unicode by
default, so there should be plenty of symbols available.
# Steve