'I'm' standing by 'my' ignorance, until 'I' either kick the habit or 'my' ignorance rebirths 'me'. This is kind of a snark hunt either way isn't it? Considering? The ongoing ignorance pertains to all the aggregates, trying to locate it as confined in some way within any one of these conditions of ongoing ignorance would be a fools errand, no?

I'm getting at ignorance is the root cause of all the aggregates. Ignorance is what continues ongoing. Bondage or freedom. That a consciousness persists in re-arising or clings from one fabrication to the next, one body to the next, is all secondary.

Hi, I don't know if coinciousness is the right word to describe if there's something individual there remains after death, well, all that I can see it that some beings are inclined to do certain things and some other things. If there's no re-linking of conciousness there is somewhere that are the "storage" of "personal kamma"? What the Buddha means with that:

"He sees — by means of the divine eye, purified & surpassing the human — beings passing away and re-appearing, and he discerns how they are inferior & superior, beautiful & ugly, fortunate & unfortunate in accordance with their kamma: 'These beings — who were endowed with bad conduct of body, speech, & mind, who reviled the noble ones, held wrong views and undertook actions under the influence of wrong views — with the break-up of the body, after death, have re-appeared in the plane of deprivation, the bad destination, the lower realms, in hell. But these beings — who were endowed with good conduct of body, speech, & mind, who did not revile the noble ones, who held right views and undertook actions under the influence of right views — with the break-up of the body, after death, have re-appeared in the good destinations, in the heavenly world.' Thus — by means of the divine eye, purified & surpassing the human — he sees beings passing away and re-appearing, and he discerns how they are inferior & superior, beautiful & ugly, fortunate & unfortunate in accordance with their kamma."

If there's no re-linking of conciousness there is somewhere that are the "storage" of "personal kamma"?

I dont think it really matters, i dont find it that important of a question as its to speculative

Well, it don't matter that much for me too, but that isn't the discussion of this topic?

It is really very speculative, but as I see in this discussion, we are gathering information in the sutras and trying to get some understanding about the subject.

We all see that the human beings have some strong unconscious tendencies, I see that a major part of our personalities are formed in contact with experiences with the external world. But we can see that people living in the same places, like our home, with similar worldly experiences and we react in various different ways, the kamma explained by the Buddha have everything to do with those reactions I am right?

So the question of the re-linking of conscious after death, or every explain of rebirth are highly speculative but we can see those things in the here in now and reflect about how this reactions occours, what their nature and how to dissipate them.

So the question of the re-linking of conscious after death, or every explain of rebirth are highly speculative but we can see those things in the here in now and reflect about how this reactions occours, what their nature and how to dissipate them.

Metta.

Rebirth in this life is all thats really important to focus on in my view, thats enough anything else is just extra

The dogmatists have claimed to have found the truth, others say that it cannot be apprehended; the Sceptics continue the search. Sextus Empiricus