According to the web traffic tracking company Quantcast, the web traffic of Richard Dawkins's website fell in 2012.[2] By October of 2014, the web traffic for his website fell to a lower level according to Quantcast.[3]

The above graph shows the monthly website traffic to Richard Dawkins' website as of June 22, 2015 in terms of unique monthly web visitors.[5] As you can see above, in 2012, Richard Dawkins saw a very large decrease in web traffic.

Richard Dawkins failed to take his Waterloo like a man

After his defeat at the Battle of Waterloo and subsequent exile, Napoléon Bonaparte was never able to regain power. The same is true of Dawkins' Elevatorgate defeat at the hands of feminists.

For agnostics and atheists who are challenged in terms of interpreting the above graphs, let me offer an interpretation in terms of score keeping:

Richard Dawkins 0

Feminists 1

Muslims 1

If only Richard Dawkins wasn't obsessed with Muslims, his Elevatorgate Waterloo could have been avoided!

Like the evolutionist Adolf Hitler, Dawkins made the mistake of conducting a multi-front war. Dawkins was a such an eager beaver to attack the Muslims on his right flank, that he completely forgot about the feminists on his left flank. No doubt he thought his "Dear Muslima" letter was a rhetorical triumph over the Islamic world after he finished typing it into his laptop, but little did he know, it would prove to be his undoing. Yes my atheist and agnostic friends, Dawkins was no match for the feminists, Muslims and Muslim sympathizers!

Richard Dawkins complains about being bullied by women

Unlike Richard Dawkins, Napoleon Bonaparte took his Waterloo like a man.

After his defeat at the Battle of Waterloo and his subsequent exile, Napoléon Bonaparte was never able to regain power. The same is true of Dawkins' Elevatorgate defeat at the hands of feminists.

And unlike Bonaparte, Dawkins whined about his defeat. Dawkins retracted his apology to the feminists and then complained about being muzzled and bullied by feminist women.

Specifically, the Washington Post reported on November 18, 2014:

“

“I don’t take back anything that I’ve said,” Dawkins said from a shady spot in the leafy backyard of one of his Bay Area supporters. “I would not say it again, however, because I am now accustomed to being misunderstood and so I will . “

He trailed off momentarily, gazing at his hands resting on a patio table.

“I feel muzzled, and a lot of other people do as well,” he continued. “There is a climate of bullying, a climate of intransigent thought police which is highly influential in the sense that it suppresses people like me.”

Recent criticism of Dawkins has come from women, many of them within the atheist movement, which has long drawn more men to its ranks. His online remarks, some women say, contribute to a climate they see as unwelcoming to female atheists.

Writing for Salon last month, atheist activist Amanda Marcotte said: “People like Dawkins . are the public face of atheism. And that public face is one that is defensively and irrationally sexist..."

Some atheist men, too, are unhappy with Dawkins’ most recent remarks[7]

After his humiliating defeat at the hands of feminists, Dawkins whined, “I feel muzzled, and a lot of other people do as well,” he continued. “There is a climate of bullying, a climate of intransigent thought police which is highly influential in the sense that it suppresses people like me.”[8]

Wasn't Dawkins given the name "Darwin's Rottweiler"? What happened? Did the feminists neuter him?

Richard Dawkins and the machismo scale

The feminist and atheist Rebecca Watson scores a 1.0 on the machismo scale because while she has significantly more machismo than Dawkins, she has significantly less machismo than Sarah Palin who hunts moose.

One of the definitions of machismo is an "exhilarating sense of power or strength".[9]

The machismo scale is a measurement scale for machismo. An online M factor score measures the online machismo of a given website or web page. Factors such as wisdom, truthfulness, manliness and non-abrasiveness are used. As you can see in web traffic graphs above, Richard Dawkins lacks online machismo!

A long haired, young earth creationist woman with long and luxurious hair generally scores a perfect 0 on the machismo scale because she is so genteel and submissive to her loving husband. In short, she is all woman!

Richard Dawkins scores a - 10.0 on the machismo scale because he allowed himself to be muzzled and bullied by feminist, atheist women. No doubt many of these women were overweight due to the propensity of lesbian atheist to have excessive girth (see: Lesbianism and obesity and Atheism and obesity). Dawkins also loses points on the machismo scale for insisting that he was a true feminist while being muzzled and bullied by feminist women.

The feminist and atheist Rebecca Watson scores a 1.0 on the machismo scale because while she has significantly more machismo than Dawkins, she has significantly less machismo than Sarah Palin who hunts moose.

(Please note: For all the atheists who attended substandard public schools and cannot spell the word atheist and put the i before the e, the plural of moose is moose and not moosses or meese).

The mullahs laugh the "superior new atheist intellect" of Richard Dawkins

The mullahs laugh at the "superior new atheist intellect" of Richard Dawkins. Dawkins was defeated by feminist women thanks to his obsession with Muslims! And to the best of the mullahs' knowledge, unlike some Muslims, Richard Dawkins has never been awarded a Nobel prize in science![10]