Mebyon Kernow has today slammed the Coalition parties for back-tracking on their election promises about support for the Police.

At the last General Election, the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats pledged that they would protect policing and put more bobbies on the beat. But they have done the exact opposite and undermined policing with devastating funding cuts.

It is unbelievable that the Home Office has confirmed that police forces covering Cornwall, England and Wales will have their central government funding cut by almost 5% in the next financial year, which overall equates to a cash reduction of £299 million. This means that the Devon and Cornwall force will have £9 million less to spend in 2015/2016, which is top of the £50 million of cuts over the last four years.

The Coalition is failing communities the length and breadth of the United Kingdom. It is a disgrace that they have refused to action their election promises and have instead done terrible damage to those public services that local people depend upon.

At the last election, Conservative leaflets in the St Austell and Newquay seat stated: “It is dishonest to claim that we will cut police officer numbers. In fact, our plans to cut bureaucracy and red tape mean that there would be more police on the street, fighting crime and protecting local communities - shadow Home Secretary Nick Grayling.”

In their leaflets, the Liberal Democrats meanwhile stated: “Making the streets of Cornwall safe is a top priority for local people in Cornwall … the Lib Dems have said they would recruit 10,000 more police officers across the country – and an extra 223 officers on the streets of Devon and Cornwall.”

Last week’s Cornish Guardian featured my final column for 2014. It was as follows:

I have just attended the final meeting of the Clay Country Local Action Group (LAG) which I have chaired over the last four years.

The Clay Country LAG was one of three Cornish LAGs set up in 2008, as part of the Rural Development Programme for England (RDPE) 2007 – 2013. Another LAG covered West Cornwall while, within the circulation area of the Cornish Guardian, the East Cornwall LAG covered the former district council areas of Caradon and North Cornwall.

The Rural Development Programme was part financed by the European Agricultural Fund for European Development 2007-2013, and each of the three LAGs was initially awarded £1.8 million to invest in local businesses and to support projects which benefit local communities. The Clay Country LAG subsequently secured additional funding for business grants.

The programme was run by staff from the Cornwall Development Company, and each LAG had a panel of volunteers from the public, private and voluntary sectors, who came together to consider the grant applications and to decide how the money would be best spent.

It has been a privilege to have been involved with the LAG and to have seen countless great projects come to fruition. Many businesses have been able to expand and grow as a consequence of the programme, while projects also included new community halls, improvements to village halls, support for community shops, creation of new allotments, improvements to local play spaces, and so much more.

Now the programmes have come to an end, I would like to say thank you to a large number of people for their contributions, which I am sure will be echoed by my fellow LAG chairs, Kim Spencer (East Cornwall) and Julian Rand (West Cornwall).

I would like to express my gratitude to all those volunteers, who gave up so much of their valuable time, month after month, as well as the staff at the Cornwall Development Company, who supported the LAGs with such professionalism.

And I would especially like to thank the LAG Managers, Clare Leverton and Linda Emmett, who worked so hard and with immense dedication. They promoted the programmes widely, assisted numerous applicants and community groups, and truly made the LAGs such a great success.

Monday, 8 December 2014

The BBC Trust is presently consulting on proposals about
which political parties will be allowed Party Election Broadcasts (PEBs) during
the upcoming General Election. The consultation – which closes on 12th January 2015 – can be
found at www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/have_your_say/peb_criteria.

Sadly, the basis of the consultation is “draft criteria”
from the Broadcasters’ Liaison Group, which states that, as in previous General
Elections, a “political party would qualify for one PEB” if it stands in a
“minimum of one sixth of the seats up for election” in one of the “home
nations” of England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales.

The recommendation, which would deny Mebyon Kernow airtime,
is both absurd and undemocratic.

As I have said so many times – how can it be fair that MK, a
Cornish political party, would need to stand in all six seats within the
historic nation of Cornwall, as well as a further 83 seats outside
of Cornwall, in order to be allowed a broadcast?

By contrast, the rulings mean that political parties in
Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland would only have to stand in three, seven
and ten seats respectively. This has meant that, over recent elections, a host
of political parties – including the Christian Party (Wales), Scottish Green
Party, Scottish Socialist Party and the Scottish Trade Union and Socialist
Coalition – have been allocated airtime.

MK is presently preparing a detailed response to a BBC consultation
on the issue of PEBs and we will continue to argue that genuine “regional” or
“national” parties which stand candidates in a majority (or all) of the seats
in a particular area be allowed an election broadcast.

Please take the time to write to the BBC Trust pointing out
the unjust nature of their proposals.

I understand that Ofcom, which regulates other broadcasters,
will be holding a similar consultation in the near future.

My article in this coming week’s Cornish Guardian will focus on George Osborne’s autumn statement. It will be as follows:

There were a plethora of announcements in George Osborne’s autumn statement, which included future capital funding for a number of transport projects in Cornwall.

The infrastructure announcements – which have been widely welcomed – included £180 million for the dualling of two sections of the A30 in Cornwall (between 2015 and 2020) and improvements to the rail network. Nick Clegg even came to Penzance to announce funding for a study into the possibility of a breakwater near the town.

Cynics might say that there was a General Election on the horizon.

George Osborne pledged to reduce the deficit within the next parliament, but there has also been considerable focus on what he didn’t say.
Economists, journalists and anti-austerity campaigners have been lining up to challenge the Chancellor on his proposals. Many have argued that his sums simply do not add up and railed against what his plans would mean for public services across the United Kingdom.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) challenged him to “spell out his deficit reduction plans,” which their research showed would lead to further cuts described as “colossal.” The IFS also pointed out that whereas £35 billion of cuts had been implemented, Osborne’s proposals equated to cuts of a further £55 billion. Others estimated that a further one million public sector jobs would be axed by 2020.

The Office for Budget Responsibility – a watchdog set up by the government – revealed that that the “cuts set out in Treasury assumptions” would see spending on the public services reduced to 35% of gross domestic product – a low level of spending not seen for around 80 years.

Put another way, Osborne wants to cut public spending to match that of the 1930s, a time of great poverty that pre-dated the creation of the National Health Service.

And as for Osborne’s own Business Secretary, Vince Cable, he damned the pronouncements as “implausible,” adding that the Chancellor’s “pre-election” spending commitments – which included £7 billion in tax cuts – could not be delivered.

The Government’s austerity agenda over the last five years has failed. The Coalition has failed to meet its own deficit-reduction targets– largely because it reduced investment too sharply, thereby reducing economic output and prolonging the length of the downturn.

Future governments need to change direction, to end austerity and to prioritise the protection of public services.

Thursday, 4 December 2014

In this week’s Cornish Guardian, I addressed the recent
spate of cuts agreed by Cornwall Council. It was as follows:

In the very same week that Cornwall Council voted through a
series of massive cuts, the leaders of 119 English councils banded together to
demand “no more cuts” by the Coalition.

In a letter to a prominent Sunday newspaper, the council
leaders warned: “Funding for services provided by councils has borne the brunt
of austerity while demand continues to rise. When the chancellor delivers his
autumn statement this Wednesday, ‘more of the same’ cannot be an option.”

They pointed out that many councils have already suffered a
40% reduction in funding since 2010. They added: “Further reductions … will
lead to vital services being scaled back or lost altogether. Services such as
libraries, leisure centres and road maintenance continue to buckle under the
strain of cuts and the ever-rising cost of caring for our growing elderly
population. Failure to address this will not only jeopardise other services,
but will pass costs on to the NHS, which will have to pick up the pieces if we
cannot protect adult social care or provide the services that keep people
healthy.”

The scale of the concern is shown by the fact that forty of
the council leaders were Conservatives and ten were Liberal Democrats – each speaking
out against the actions of their own Government.

But they need to do so much more than just sign a collective
letter.

Politicians from Westminster’s
Coalition parties must be much more forceful in demanding that the
Conservatives and Liberal Democrats put an end to the cuts. They could, for
example, threaten the mass resignation of councillors from Coalition parties unless
drastic changes are made.

Last week was indeed a terrible week to be at County Hall.

The majority of Cornwall Councillors voted for four-year
budget plan, which included a total of £196 million of cuts – largely because
of the callous and totally disproportionate level of cuts to local government from
central government.

Council tax will rise by 1.97% in 2014/2015 – a figure which
is just below the 2% threshold which would have led to a referendum on the
issue – and hundreds of jobs will also be lost.

The four MK councillors did not support the proposed budget,
but were among thirteen councillors who supported an amendment to seek a referendum
on a council tax increase of 6%. It was opposed by 99 councillors.

It was our view that the additional £9 million of funding would
have helped to partially offset some of the damaging cuts being forced on Cornwall, for example, in
adult social care, children’s services and one-stop-shops/libraries.

Following the publication of the Smith Commission, which proposes significant additional powers for the Scottish Parliament, I have written to the leaders of the largest Westminster parties.

Extracts are as follows:

I believe that the recent independence referendum has been good for British democracy, and it is to be welcomed that there is a growing debate about the future governance of the whole of the United Kingdom.

We believe that there is certainly a desperate need to address the unequal constitutional relationships between the various nations and regions of the UK, as well as the centralising influence of London and the South East of England.

Ed Miliband has stated that “devolution is for everyone,” while David Cameron has pledged “a balanced settlement – fair to people in Scotland, and … to everyone in England, Wales and Northern Ireland as well.”

Indeed, many politicians are now talking about devolution or new democratic settlements for the “four nations” of the United Kingdom.

Kirsty Williams of the Welsh Liberal Democrats has talked about "four distinct nations” with their “own ambitions, own needs and own outlooks." Nations, which she said, all needed a “place at the table.”

Gordon Brown has spoken of the specific rights and needs of the “minority nations” of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. He has also expressed his concern at the “disregard” shown to the “smaller nations” of the UK by Westminster Governments.

However, when it comes to democratic reforms, it seems that the three largest Westminster parties all have a blindspot in terms of the historic nation of Cornwall and our call for greater self-government through a National Assembly of Cornwall.

It seems that – to many – we are the invisible nation that cannot be mentioned.

I am also extremely worried that much of the debate around devolution is not actually about democratic devolution at all, but the reform of local government and the localisation of some economic and political powers to unelected and unaccountable bodies.

There is significant support for the creation of a National Assembly of Cornwall. I would remind you that, in December 2011, 50,000 declarations calling for a Cornish Assembly – collected in less than 18 months – were presented to 10 Downing Street. It is our view that these declarations continue to represent a great statement of intent from the ordinary people of Cornwall about the need for meaningful democratic devolution.

I would also inform you that an opinion poll undertaken by Survation for a research and film documentary project at the University of Exeter (Penryn) recently sampled 500 voters in the Camborne and Redruth seat, which found that (i) 60% of voters supported the devolution of more power from Westminster to Cornwall, with only 19% opposed, and (ii) 49% of respondents supported the creation of a Cornish Assembly (similar to that in Wales) with 31% against.

I would therefore appeal to you to ensure that, in future discussions about the governance of the UK, you will strive to deliver a comprehensive new democratic settlement for Cornwall, that matches those being achieved in our sister nations of Scotland and Wales.

Wednesday, 26 November 2014

Cornwall Council yesterday approved a four-year budget plan,
which will see cuts of £196 million and the loss of hundreds of jobs. Council
tax will rise by 1.97% in 2014/2015, a figure which is just below the 2% threshold
which would have led to a referendum on the issue.

The four MK councillors did not support the budget.

We were among thirteen councillors who supported an
amendment to seek a council tax increase of 6%, which would have been placed in
front of Cornish voters in a referendum. It was our view that the additional £9
million would have partially offset some of the damaging cuts being forced on Cornwall, for example, in adult social care, childrens services and one-stop-shops/libraries.

We also supported an amendment to safeguard youth provision
which was overwhelmingly defeated.

The final budget was passed with 69 voters in favour with 21 votes against.
There were a total of 19 abstentions.

During the wider debate around the budget, there was much
comment about the disproportionate levels of cuts being imposed on local
government by the Coalition government, but among many of the Coalition
councillors themselves, there was almost a denial that the cuts had anything to do with
their parties!!!

I presented my latest monthly report to last night’s meeting
of St Enoder Parish Council. It covered the period from 24th October to 23rd November,
and was as follows:

1. Council
meetings

I have attended a range of formal meetings over the last month.
These included: Cabinet; Environment, Heritage and Planning Portfolio Advisory
Committee (plus an associated informal PAC and two pre-agenda sessions);
Constitution and Governance Committee, and a briefing on Cornwall Council’s
budget situation.

2. Council
meetings

I have also attended a meeting of the Leader / Community-led
Local Development working group, which I chair. This working group is devising
the framework for the Local Action Groups (LAGs) for the new European funding
programme. I also attended a meeting of the South and East Cornwall LAG, which
covers an area stretching from the China Clay parishes in the west to the
Tamar, and to which I have been appointed as a member.

Also attended was an Executive meeting of the Cornwall and
Isles of Scilly Rural Partnership, and the project team for the St Austell Bay
Economic Forum, which seeks the promote economic growth in St Austell and
surrounding areas (including Clay Country).

I also supported an event at New County Hall, which was
organised by the university at Penryn and sought to engage local people with
decision-making in Cornwall.
It was advertised as a “Citizens’ Take-over of County Hall.”

Locally, I have met with both the Indian Queens Under-5s and
the Wesley Under-5s to discuss their plans for the future and to explore how I
might be able to help.

3. Penare Pig
Farm, Higher Fraddon and associated AD plant

The last month has been dominated by the development of the
AD plant at Higher Fraddon, and the re-development of the pig farm.

I organised a public meeting, which took place on 30th
October at KingsleyVillage. Cllr Hopkins
chaired the meeting in his role as the chairman of the Parish Council. Present
at the meeting were: Head and Assistant Head of Planning at Cornwall Council Phil
Mason and Nigel Doyle, Graeme Lochhead and John Deane (Greener for Life) from
the biogas development, Russell Dodge (Business Location Services) and Dan
Johns on behalf of the pig farm. There were over 120 local residents at the
meeting and there was considerable anger at the failure of those present to
address the concerns of local people.

Regular contact with local residents has been maintained through
the Higher Fraddon Residents Action Group, which has included meetings on 30th
October, 10th November and 13th November. Stephen Gilbert MP also attended the
meeting on 10th November.

I also met with Phil Mason and Nigel Doyle on a number of
occasions, who organised a meeting with Graeme Lochhead and David Manley from
Greener for Life – also on 10th November. I had previously met with Graeme
Lochhead on 31st October, immediately after the public meeting, and I have
spoken to representatives of Greener for Life and the pig farm on numerous
occasions over the telephone.

A number of Council officers have visited the site,
including staff from the enforcement team and highways.

The key news to report is that the three tanks constructed
by Greener for Life are not in compliance with the agreed plans, and the bund
has also been constructed slightly out of position. Cornwall Council has
therefore taken the view that the plant does not have a valid planning consent.

Greener for Life submitted a non-material amendment (NMA)
earlier in the year, which stated that the tanks would be smaller than
originally planned. For example, one of the original consented tanks would have
been 9.13m high, the NMA stated that it would actually only be 6.0m high, but I
understand that the height of the finished tanks is about 10m.

This was reported to Greener for Life prior to the meeting with
Cornwall Council on 10th November. My notes from the meeting were as follows:

All in all, I found the meeting to be fractious.

Vehicle movements

The meeting commenced with a discussion about recent
movements of large lorries. I complained that the number of such lorries that
had been bringing in material to “seed” one of the tanks, since Thursday 6th
November. I pointed out that this was not in compliance with either the
construction management plan (for the construction period) or the traffic
restrictions on the operational phase.

The response from Greener for Life was that this was a
“commissioning” phase, which fell between the construction and operational
phases. They acknowledged that they had not supplied information to the Council
about the traffic movements at an early stage, but said they would restrict the
movements to no more than 11 tankers each day (until Thursday this week).

Graeme Lochhead added that following the recent public
meeting at KingsleyVillage, Greener for Life
had acknowledged the anger from many in the community and taken the decision to
reduce the amount of material they would bring in to “seed” the plant. He
stated that instead of bringing in 3,800 tonnes of material, they were only
bringing in 1,800 tonnes of material and commissioning just one of the tanks.

It was noted that Greener for Life, at Phil Mason’s request,
had asked the Highways Agency if they could temporarily close one lane on the
A30 to make these deliveries. We were told that it would be possible, but would
take another seven days to arrange. Greener for Life stated that they intended
to keep the deliveries coming until Thursday 13th November, and the closure
therefore could not be actioned speedily enough for their timetable!

When it was suggested that Greener for Life stop deliveries,
they said they were unwilling to do this because it would compromise the
commencement of the AD process. Graeme Lochhead explained that the material was
being delivered at 25 degrees and would be heated up to 40 degrees. If it fell
below a certain temperature, the bacteria would die; and if the heat was 40
degrees but the tanks were not being fed with material, the bacteria would eat
each other.

They added that after Thursday, they intended to “ramp up”
the commissioning with the addition of maize silage, but stated this was much less
than originally planned.

Graeme Lochhead promised to provide me with detailed
information on their traffic movements between now and Christmas.

Planning

Nigel Doyle reported back on the findings of the enforcement
officers who visited the site on Tuesday 4th November. He stated that the
embankment was closer to residents than on plans and the tanks were not in
accordance with the second NMA which stated the height of the tanks would be
reduced. It was reported that the diameter of the tanks were greater than
stated and the height of the tanks were also much greater than agreed.

Given the present height of the tanks, the representatives
from Greener for Life prompted a discussion about possibly increasing the
height of the bund, with enhanced planting.

Nigel Doyle made it clear that, because the plant had not
been built in accordance with plans, it therefore did not have planning
permission. David Manley stated that he would need to seek legal advice on
whether they could legally challenge the Council’s position, but was given
short thrift by Nigel Doyle.

Phil Mason stated that there were two choices on the table
for those involved: (i) enforcement or a (ii) retrospective planning
application. He added that he felt the main impact and local concern was
traffic, and requested to know how a new application would mitigate traffic
impacts.

It seemed to me that Greener for Life did not appear too
interested in reducing the number of large vehicles travelling to Higher
Fraddon.

David Manley said that the initial NMA had already been
agreed and that had allowed larger vehicles within the consented 51 two-way
lorry movements. Nigel stated that the NMA was no longer valid, but the
decision-makers could choose (or not) to give it weight when the new application
was assessed.

I understood that Greener for Life were going to present
their latest proposal for vehicle movements to the meeting. But no new
information was presented and David Manley referred to paperwork (already
circulated to the Action Group) which suggested 38 two-way movements of 40 or
44 tonne vehicles per week.

I made it clear to Greener for Life that I would oppose such
an increase in large vehicles and I would push for the plant to have less
feedstock, unless they could find another access (off the A30) or an
alternative way to feed the plant.

Nigel Doyle asked Greener for Life to set out a timetable
for a revised application and to guarantee that the materials would not be
inaccurate or misleading. Whether there would need to a screening opinion was
also discussed.

Graeme Lochhead stated that he would need to write a report
for Greener for Life’s directors and investors about how best to proceed.

Access off the A30

Phil Mason asked if Greener for Life would agree to work
with Cornwall Council to argue for a new access road off the A30. They
confirmed that they would.

Phil Mason then asked if Greener for Life would sign a legal
agreement to use “best endeavours” to push for a new access road off the A30.
They stated they would need to discuss this with their directors and investors,
as well as other interested parties (the pig farm and owners of the land for
the biogas plant, the Dymond family).

It was also noted that Greener for Life had been granted a
temporary lane closure on the A30 on 23rd/24th November for the delivery of
some fitting, which it was agreed would be a precedent that could be argued in
the future.

Pig slurry

Graeme Lochhead stated that the biogas plant has a
commercial arrangement to take “3,000-5,000” tonnes of pig slurry from the
farm, but would not necessarily take a greater amount if it was produced. The
planners challenged this and I pointed that no-one had made account of such any
removal of pig slurry from the pig farm in terms of vehicle movements.

Nigel Doyle expressed his concern at the lack of clarity as
to how the pig farm and biogas plant would be working together and stated that
the two expected planning applications would need to be consistent with each
other.

Feed-in-tariff (FiT)

I asked about the FiT and the implication of gas not being
produced by 18th December. Graeme Lochhead stated that the FiT was dropping
from 15p to 12p, and if they had not produced gas by 18th December, could lose
over £100,000 per annum.

I raised the point suggested by Stephen Gilbert MP that the
feed-in-tariff would only be paid if all necessary consents were in place and
that if the planning consent was no longer valid, would there be a problem? The
Greener for Life representatives did not know the answer and stated they would
look into this.

Graeme Lochhead also argued that the Council should not
undermine the work of Greener for Life. He said that if the profitability of
the plant was damaged, it would have a potential knock-on impact on their other
projects in Cornwall
because of a lack of “investor confidence.” I stated that I had no confidence
in Greener for Life and how they had been operating.

Graeme Lochhead added that if Greener for Life failed to
achieve the present FiT amount, they would need to approach the operation of
the plant in a different way to maximise income. In particular, he stated that
they would need to source materials that would generate more gas in place of
the maize silage, for example, which would generate less gas.

Sub-contactors

Graeme Lochhead also reported that two sub-contactors,
working for FLI Energy, had been disrespectful to local residents. He added
that they had been sacked as a result.

Plant on opposite side of A30

I stated that local residents had heard about a possible
plan from Greener for Life’s to build a tandem plant on the other side of the
A30, but that there were great inconsistencies in what people had been told.
David Manley stated that the landowner (Imerys) had concerns about mineral
rights and the plan was on the “back burner.”

I asked for more details about the plan and it was confirmed
that, if such a plant was built, a tunnel (for pipes) would be drilled under
the A30 (which they said was quite easy to do and not too expensive). Material
for the plant could then be fed through the pipe in a liquid form.

I suggested that they needed to do more work on this, as
this could be an alternative way to reduce traffic movements, and asked for
more information about exactly what might be done. It was suggested that
Cornwall Council could take a pro-active approach to this issue.

Further information

Graeme Lochhead stated that he:

- Would arrange a
meeting with the closest local residents – within two weeks – to discuss the
extent of screening around the site.

- Wanted to organise
a display about the biogas plant and how it would work, etc.

- Planned to explore
the best way to travel to the site by attempting the various routes to Higher
Fraddon, using those vehicles that they would wish to use in the future.

- Would provide me
with detailed information about all the vehicles they wished to use, including
dimensions.

The possibility of enforcement action

At the meeting itself, the planners made reference to the
potential for stop notices or enforcement action that could be taken. Nigel
Doyle made it clear to Greener for Life that the Council would need to consider
all options.

I can also confirm that Nigel Doyle had discussions with
officers from the enforcement section and I will report back when I have heard
more from them.

I have been putting pressure on Council officials to be more
robust in dealing with both the developers of the biogas plant and the owners
of the pig farm, which has continued to redevelop the unit without any form of
planning consent.

It is also the case that much of what I have been told in
recent weeks is contradictory to other information which I have been supplied
with.

Taking much of the above into account, I wrote to Phil Mason
last week. The letter was as set out below:

First, may I thank you (and Nigel Doyle) for meeting with me
on a number of occasions over the last two weeks to discuss the problems caused
by the development of the biogas plant and the redevelopment of the pig farm at
Penare Farm.

I fully appreciate that you are trying to liaise with the
developers (Greener for Life) and representatives of the pig farm (Business
Location Services) to ascertain the best way in which to address what is
presently happening at Higher Fraddon.

However, it is ten days since we met with representatives of
Greener for Life (Monday 10 November), when you informed them that they no
longer had a valid planning consent because the application had not been
constructed in accordance with agreed plans.

I find it unacceptable that we have heard little from
Greener for Life over this period and that they have continued to construct /
commission their plant. I know that, because their planning consent is longer
valid, we cannot control certain aspects of their activities through the (now
defunct) conditions. But the extent of some of the vehicle movements has been
greater than those (i) stated by Greener for Life in their Construction
Management Plan and (ii) specified in the conditions of the actual consent,
which I consider unacceptable.

Likewise, the construction of the pig farm is continuing
even though a planning application has not even been submitted.

The residents of Higher Fraddon have had to put up with a
lot over the summer / early autumn, and they are still suffering significant
ongoing harm in their daily lives. This has even caused the Police to have a
presence in the area (see below).

It is also the case that Cornwall Council, the residents and
I have all been seeking information from Greener for Life and pig farm about
future plans and what is actually planned, etc, but the information we have
received has been inconsistent and contradictory, and on occasions could even
be described as misinformation.

I would wish to bring your attention to the following.

- The conflict between the vehicle movements (lorries) and
local population is actually escalating. I would refer you to correspondence
sent to the Council yesterday (18th November) about what happened earlier in
the day, and led to Police being called to visit Higher Fraddon.

- The Police have confirmed to me that they do not have the
capacity to be permanently on call to attempt to resolve issues near Penare
Farm.

- Greener for Life have been told that they do not have a
valid planning consent for their site and have failed to make any meaningful
changes to their operations (ie. reductions in traffic movements). It concerns
me that they have yet to accept this and may be looking to challenge the
Council’s position. It also concerns me that they have not come back to the
Council with any proposals to address or mitigate the concerns of local people.

- Greener for Life also seem to me to be unwilling to look at
significant reductions in the amount of feedstock that it would wish to see
delivered to the site in the future.

- The pig farm is continuing to construct new buildings, etc,
even though it has yet to submit a planning application, and the plan recently
submitted to Cornwall Council for scoping does not reflect what residents had
previously been told about the location of the attenuation tank.

- There is endless misinformation being provided to Cornwall
Council and local residents, which could/should impact on what may or not be
consented in the future. Please see below examples:

All statements about the extent of present vehicle movements
have been challenged by local residents. For example, one resident received the
following email about traffic movement from Greener for Life on the morning of
18 November about movements later that day: “Regarding vehicles, we will have
the two tractors in today, they will have come in and off loaded by 16:00. I have also been dealt a
surprise and have been informed a load which was meant to be broken up into
small loads will now be arriving on two larger vehicles.”

Various comments about the possible additional plant on the
other side of the A30 have been extremely inconsistent. Some residents have
been told it is “dead in the water” while others have been told that the option
is still being explored.

At a meeting at Circuit House, Truro, on 17 October, I was told that the pig
farm would produce 3,000 tonnes of pig slurry which would all go to the biogas
plant. This was much less than the 7,800 tonnes recorded in the original
planning application, with the explanation being that the new buildings would
ensure there was less dilution with rain water. But more recently, Greener for
Life informed me that they have an agreement in place to take 3,000-5,000
tonnes, but would not necessarily take all the slurry if more was produced. I
have also spoken to Business Location Services for the pig farm who are saying
the amount of pig slurry could still be s high as 7,000 tonnes.

- With reference to the discrepancies shown above in terms of
the pig slurry, it is clear that there is a lack of communication between Greener
for Life and pig farm, which need to be addressed.

- Local people are demanding to know why formal enforcement
action is not being undertaken, and I have to say that I share the concerns of
my residents.

- I am extremely disappointed by the lack of meaningful
dialogue from both Greener for Life and the owner of the pig farm, and request
that you look to undertake enforcement action as a matter of urgency.

I have also twice complained to Greener for Life for their
failure to keep me, as divisional member, and St Enoder Parish Council informed
about changes to their vehicle movements, etc.

4. St Enoder
Neighbourhood Plan

I have been liaising with the Cornwall Rural Community
Council, who have been inputting the data from the returned questionnaires for
the St Enoder Neighbourhood Plan.

A total of 402 questionnaires were returned and I have been
told that the draft report on the feedback should be available this week. I
have also requested a further breakdown for the component parts of St Enoder
Parish, namely (i) Fraddon, (ii) Indian Queens / St Columb Road and (iii) Summercourt.

Meetings of the working group will be convened for December
to plan the next stage of the work programme.

5. Cornwall Local Plan

At the 14th November meeting of the Environment, Heritage
and Planning Portfolio Advisory Committee (which I chair), the final draft of
the Cornwall Local Plan was considered. It will be presented to a special
meeting of Full Council on 16th December and agreement sought to submit the
document to the Secretary of State, prior to examination by an Inspector.

It has taken a significant amount of time and there are many
elements of the Local Plan which I did not support (for example, the total
number of houses for the 2010-2030 period and the eco-town), but lost the
relevant arguments some months, or even years ago. Likewise, many aspects of
the process has been dictated from central government, leaving little room for
manoeuvre.

Earlier in the year, I wrote to central government on behalf
of a cross-party group of councillors, seeking a meeting with the Planning
Minister to express a range of concerns about the process to produce a local
plan. This was granted but the meeting was only attended by the Cabinet Member
for the Environment, Heritage and Planning. The attendance of myself and other
councillors was vetoed by the Leader of the Council.

6. Unauthorised
development on land adjacent to the Kelliers

At the last two meetings, I reported how land immediately to
the east of the Kelliers was being developed without planning permission and
that the landowner had put three caravans into the site, and that I had been in
regular contact with the Council’s enforcement officer.

I can confirm that a total of six caravans have been moved
onto the site and a number of them are being lived in. I understand from one of
the enforcement officers that the occupants of the caravans are migrant
labourers.

I have repeatedly challenged the Council to take enforcement
action, but this has not happened because the owner of the land has stated that
he is in the process of putting in a planning application.

7. Budget cuts

The unitary authority will be holding its Full Council
meeting on 25th November, when cuts totalling £196 million put forward by the
ruling Liberal Democrat and Independent Cabinet will be considered.

The situation is grim and many of the cuts are extremely
unpalatable. The figure of £196 million would be spread over four years and is
based on assumptions about the ongoing level of central government cuts. The
impact of such cuts on its shrunken financial base will be to further undermine
the ability of Cornwall Council to provide basic services that local people
should have a right to expect.

I will report back at tonight’s meeting.

8. Mobile library

I have previously reported that in the near future, Cornwall
Council’s mobile library service will be restricted to a single library van
that will visit locations once a month.

The present list of potential stops include Indian Queens,
Pedna Carne and Summercourt. I have also requested that there is an additional
stop at Fraddon and will report back when I have more information.

9. Property
Level Protection schemes

As noted in previous monthly reports, eight properties in St
Enoder Parish, which were flooded during the last two winters, are benefiting
from the Property Level Protection scheme. The works have been completed at
four of the properties. However, there have been delays at some of the
remaining homes and I am actively chasing the contractors to seek assurances
that the works will be completed soon.

10. Works on the
local road network

I am continuing to liaise with Cornwall Council in relation
to improvement works on local roads. A number of further problems have been
brought to my attention (eg. need for patching in Harvenna Close, Fraddon) and
I will report back more fully in my next monthly report.

11. Inquiries

Throughout the last month, I have also helped numerous
people and local organisations with advice and guidance on a wide range of
issues. These included problems relating to traffic, housing, drainage and vegetation.

My article in today’s Cornish Guardian addressed global
inequality. It is as follows:

The respected charity OXFAM has launched a campaign titled
“Even It Up,” which seeks to pressure governments to do more to tackle
inequality.

I believe it is a very important campaign of great relevance
in the 21st century, both for the United Kingdom and wider World.

Here in the UK,
the austerity measures of the Conservative and Liberal Democrat Coalition are
certainly hitting the less-well-off much more than the wealthy.

One recent study shows that in 2000, the richest 10%
controlled 51.5% of Britain’s
wealth, but this has now risen to 54.1%.

One broadsheet newspaper summarised the report as follows:
“Wealth inequality has risen four times faster in the seven years after the
crash compared with the seven years before. The rich in the UK are becoming
richer faster than ever. Wealth inequality rose under Labour; it rose faster
under the Coalition.”

OXFAM itself states that “economic inequality has reached
extreme levels,” while many of its statistics are truly shocking.

In 2013, “seven out of ten people lived in countries where
the gap between the rich and poor is worse than thirty years ago.”

In 2014, the “richest 85 people on the planet owned as much
as the poorest half of humanity,” and these 85 individuals, last year, “saw
their wealth increase by half a million dollars every minute.”

Since the financial crisis, “the number of billionaires has
more than doubled and in that same period at least a million mothers died in
childbirth.”

There are “sixteen billionaires in sub-Saharan Africa, alongside the 358 million people living in
extreme poverty.”

OXFAM want the “Even It Up” campaign to be the “start of
something special.” The organisation
states that it knows “we can't solve the inequality crisis overnight,” but has
pledged that it will take on “governments and big business to make sure they
deliver the real change needed to reverse the trend of rising inequality.”

Specific proposals include sorting out the tax system so the
richest and huge corporations “pay their fair share,” spending more on “public
health and education to give the poor a fighting chance,” and ensuring “fair
wages for everyone.”

It is my hope that the British Government, and other
governments around the globe, actually listen and put fairness at the heart of
their future policies.

Monday, 17 November 2014

For those people who were unable to attend the recent MK Conference, I focused quite strongly on the need for democratic reform and the devolution of greater powers to Cornwall. The relevant extracts from my speech are as follows:

Westminster politics

Confidence in Westminster politics is at an all-time low.

And is it any wonder?

The House of Commons and the House of Lords are still dominated by the same old establishment parties.

And their placemen control all manner of unelected and accountable quangos that litter the very core of the civic life of Britain.

A political elite – career politicians – they are far removed from the reality of what happens in our lives. They put the needs of the powerful, the banks and big business ahead of ordinary people like you and I.

In their cynical politics, they have little idea about the day-to-day struggles of ordinary people, who are working hard to get by, battling to make ends meet, sometimes juggling multiple jobs to simply pay the bills.

The present London-centred political system – with its top-down politics – is well and truly broken. It is not working. And more and more people are coming to that obvious conclusion.

St Piran’s Oratory and National Minority status

The uncovering of the historic chapel of our national saint is truly symbolic – and it is fitting that it is also happening in the very same year that central government bowed to years of pressure to recognise the Cornish as a national minority through the Council of Europe’s Framework Convention for the Protection for National Minorities.

Doesn’t that last statement sound just wonderful.

It is indeed wonderful that all the Celtic peoples of the United Kingdom– the Cornish, the Irish, the Scottish and the Welsh – will be afforded equal protection through the Framework Convention.

Hundreds and hundreds of people – from all aspects of Cornish life – have played their part in this campaign. I see many of you here today.

And make no mistake – this formal recognition of the Cornish is a landmark decision of momentous political significance and it could – and should – help shape the very future of our nation.

Government departments and public bodies will now be required to take the specific needs of Cornwall into account when formulating policy and making decisions.

And we have to find a way to ensure that the cultural recognition embodied in minority status is followed by a wider acceptance of our right to greater control over our political, civic, and economic lives through the creation of a legislative National Assembly of Cornwall.

Scotland

We certainly owe a great debt to the people of Scotland for the manner in which they have debated the future governance of their country over the last two years.

And how the process has energised voters and shown that “politics as usual” is no longer acceptable.

Some months ago, Colin Fox from the Scottish Socialist Party wrote:

"No country in the world is more engaged in the democratic debate over self-determination than Scotland today. The referendum has energised people to a remarkable extent with debates on the 'democratic deficit' at the heart of Scottish politics now taking place in households, schools, workplaces, village halls and community centres from one end of the country to the other.”

The First Minister of Scotland, Alex Salmond, rightly described the whole process as a “triumph for democracy,” while even the Better Together campaign acknowledged that there was a “cry for change,” which was likely to be “echoed in every part of the UK.

Alex Salmond is also right that the “real guardians of progress are not the politicians at Westminster … but the energised activism of tens of thousands of people” who he predicted “will refuse to go back into the political shadows.”

Friends, it is up to us to ensure that the echo from Cornwall reverberates across the length and breadth of the whole United Kingdom, and we must – with confidence – put our case for Cornwall into the political spotlight, and build the momentum to bring home significant political and economic powers to our local communities.

Four nations or five nations?

Many Westminster politicians are now talking about devolution or new democratic settlements for the “four nations” of the United Kingdom.

David Cameron pledged “a balanced settlement – fair to people in Scotland, and … to everyone in England, Wales and Northern Ireland as well.”

Kirsty Williams of the Welsh Liberal Democrats has talked about "four distinct nations” with their “own ambitions, own needs and own outlooks." Nations, which she said, all needed a “place at the table.”

Gordon Brown has spoken of the specific rights and needs of the “minority nations” of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. He has also expressed his concern at the “disregard” shown to the “smaller nations” of the UK by Westminster Governments.

That is all a bit fine from the man who was Chancellor, when we presented 50,000 declarations demanding a Cornish Assembly to 10 Downing Street in 2001.

And whose Government dismissed the declarations and refused to consider our calls for greater powers for Cornwall.

The truth is that the Westminster parties have a blind spot when it comes to the historic Celtic nation of Cornwall.

To them - when it comes to democratic reforms – we are the invisible nation that cannot be mentioned.

Well – I have a message for the establishment in London.

We will not be silent. We will not meekly stand in the political shadows. We will make the case for greater Cornish self government and we will be heard.

Westminster politics in Cornwall

Now, I am not surprised at the noises coming out of the London HQs of the Westminster parties.

But what I find most unforgivable is the attitude of their local representatives here in Cornwall.

The local Conservative Party has set out its opposition to a Cornish Assembly – with their normal disregard for the facts.

Tory MPs have been busy scaremongering away.

And their arguments have been heroically inconsistent.

Sarah Newton MP described a Cornish Assembly as a “tokenistic institution …” But she has gone on to argue that the devolution of more powers to Cornwall, as a constituent part of the UK, would lead to the break up of the United Kingdom.

And yet, David Cameron says that more powers to Scotland will actually strengthen the UK!

Candy Atherton meanwhile, speaking on behalf of the Cornwall Labour Party, said that a Cornish Assembly would be just “another layer of bureaucrats.”

What a shameful statement. And how galling for all those Labour MSPs and AMs serving in the Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly – their national legislatures – to be dismissed as “bureaucrats.”

And then there are the Liberal Democrats. Well …

One minute, they are claiming that they are leading the campaign for a Cornish Assembly – demanding “real devolution … like Wales.”

The next moment, they are clearly only seeking a few additional powers for local government.

Liberal Democrat MPs who previously argued for a powerful Cornish Assembly and warned the previous Labour Government that it would not “get away” with “fobbing us off with a rearrangement of deckchairs on the Titanic of local government” … are saying and doing the opposite now that they are in Government.

I am also particularly disappointed at the lack of ambition being shown by the leadership of the unitary authority. There is flowery language aplenty, but instead of showing real ambition for Cornwall, they are timidly seeking greater “freedoms and flexibilities” for the unitary authority.

Those of us who are serious about greater Cornish self-government must reiterate time and time again that our nation must be considered on a par with Wales and Scotland.

It is not about local government reform but delivering a new democratic settlement that matches those which have been won east of Offa’s Dyke and to the north of the Solway Firth.

Monday, 10 November 2014

Mebyon Kernow – the Party for Cornwall will be holding its 2014 Conference
on Sunday 16th November at New County Hall in Truro.

I would like to extend an invitation to members of the
public to attend the afternoon session, which will start at 2.00. Anyone
interested in finding out more about MK would be extremely welcome, and we
would be delighted to see you there and to hear your viewpoints.”

The morning session will consist of a series of debates
proposed by members of the party, as well as the Annual General Meeting.

The afternoon session will include a keynote speech from myself
as Party Leader, as well as two roundtable discussions with MK's parliametary
candidates. The subjects for the two discussions will be (i) the implications
of the recent Scottish referendum vote and the campaign for a Cornish Assembly and
(ii) MK’s campaign priorities for the 2015 General Election.

It is my strong belief that everyone needs to fully understand
the horror of war, and to know more about the tragic loss of millions of lives
in the two World Wars and other subsequent conflicts.

I believe that we should welcome
the wide-ranging array of exhibitions, events and television/radio programmes
that have commemorated the 100th anniversary of the outbreak of the Great War.

And, as well as marking the
bravery and sacrifice of those who served, there has also been a considerable exploration
of the wider issues about the enormity of the conflict.

Like many others, I was particularly impressed by the display
at the Tower of London, where 888,246 ceramic poppies were
installed as an artwork.

Each poppy represented a British or Commonwealth death during
the Great War and it was an important and truly poignant display.

I nonetheless feel that many people – myself included – do
not have the capacity to comprehend the loss of 888,246 men and women between
1914 and 1918.

And I think we equally struggle to comprehend the magnitude
of the overall losses of the First World War, in which ten million service
personnel and some six million civilians died. Or indeed, the casualties in the
Second World War, when over 50 million individuals lost their lives – the vast
majority of them civilians.

The extent of suffering is truly terrifying,
but each loss was also intensely personal.

Thousands of people attended recent Remembrance Day
commemorations across Cornwall,
and I was pleased to lay a wreath at my local war memorial in St Enoder
Churchtown.

At this memorial, just like others across the whole of the
country, the names that were read out were members of those communities - sons,
husbands, brothers, workmates and friends – who left behind children, wives,
parents and siblings.

And whether they focus on the big picture or the individual
experience, it is essential that politicians and opinion formers, present and
future, learn from past wars and do all in their power to prevent further
conflicts around the globe.

Since I wrote my article for the Cornish Guardian, I have
continued to plug away at County Hall to try to get answers, and to encourage
the Council to take action.

Printed below is an update I circulated to local residents
at the end of last week.

On 5th November, I had a meeting with Phil Mason and Nigel
Doyle (Head and Assistant Head of Planning & Regeneration) for over three
hours, and I have the following to report back.

Sorry for the length and that much of the information is of
a very technical nature.

I formally remade the following requests:

- A formal letter clarifying the Council’s position on the
(i) first non-material amendment (NMA) and whether the Council will be
challenging what was agreed about vehicle movements, and (ii) how the authority
will be dealing with further changes to the traffic movements (that agreed
within the original consent and the initial NMA).

- A formal letter clarifying the Council’s position on the
second NMA (downsizing of tanks) and the failure of Greener for Life to build
the tanks in compliance to any agreed plans, as well as what action the Council
will be taking.

- A decision from the Council about the latest statement
from Greener for Life (about increased lorry movements between 7th and 14th
November), which would not be in compliance with the construction management
plan or the conditions for the consent, and what action it will be taking.

- An update on what progress has been made with regard to
Cornwall Council investigating the possibility of an access directly off the
A30.

- An update on what progress has been made with regard to
Cornwall Council Highways, reviewing the state of the roads through Higher
Fraddon (and surrounding areas) and what can be done.

- A decision from the Council about the constraints for both
the construction and operational phases for the biogas plant, because it is
clear to me that their present operations are not in compliance with either the
construction management plan for the build or the actual planning consent.

- A census of existing traffic movements through Higher
Fraddon and surrounding areas.

The main part of the discussion focussed on the failure of
Greener for Life to build the three tanks in compliance with agreed plans.

Phil Mason confirmed that two members of the Council’s
enforcement team were on site all-day on Monday surveying the site and what has
been built. They are presently working on all the data and will have submitted
all the information to senior officers by the end of the week.

However, Phil Mason and Nigel Doyle already accept that the
tanks are not in compliance with the planning consent (or the subsequent NMA).
This is very significant for us, as it means that the tanks do not have the
benefit of planning permission and the biogas plant will, I believe, need to be
revisited through the planning process. I understand it could also mean that
the NMAs are also no longer valid.

Phil Mason and Nigel Doyle contacted Greener for Life to
tell them about the situation and informed them that they were about to send a
letter to them setting out the Council’s concerns and seeking an immediate
meeting.

This meeting has been agreed for 5.00 on Monday (10th
November). I will be present at this meeting.

The letter sent yesterday was as follows:

Dear Sirs

Biogas Plant at Penare Farm, Higher Fraddon

I refer to the above development that was granted planning
permission under reference number PA12/01700. Subsequent to that permission two
non-material amendments were granted under application numbers PA13/09571 and
PA14/06189.

As you are aware two enforcement cases were raised following
complaints about breaches of the construction management plan and the more
fundamental issue that was being raised that the Digesters were not being built
in accordance with either the approved plans or those granted under PA14/06189.

The provisional results of the site survey that was
undertaken on 4 November
2014 indicate that the Digesters are not being built in accordance
with the approved plans. They therefore do not have the benefit of planning
permission. As such the Digesters are being erected at your own risk and may be
liable to enforcement action.

Following the results of the full site survey the Council
will need to determine what course of action to take and whether specifically
to issue a Temporary Stop Notice in advance of an Enforcement Notice.

I have been made aware that there is an intention to
transport waste to the site from 6 November 2014 to prime the Digesters. Given the results
of the provisional site survey and the implications this has for the planning
position I would recommend that you delay this activity until the full results
of the survey are known. This would give us an opportunity to determine the
facts and consider appropriate remedies and actions together.

I would therefore recommend that we meet at 5.00pm New County Hall, Truro on Monday 10 November 2014 or
at a mutually convenient time.

If the waste is transported onto the site in advance of our
meeting and it proves disruptive then the likelihood that a Temporary Stop
Notice would be issued will increase.

I trust the above is satisfactory and look forward to
meeting you next week.

Yours sincerely,

Nigel Doyle (Assistant Head of Planning & Regeneration)

As you will see, the Council is still considering how it can
use its powers to address or revisit issues relating to the biogas plant. I can
confirm that the Council is also seeking legal clarification on some points.

It is all extremely complex situation, both for the validity
of the planning permission but also related “conditions.” I will report back
further, next week, when I have greater clarity.

In advance of the meeting next Monday, it is also my
intention to meet with key representatives of the Higher Fraddon Residents
Action Group to talk through the technical / legal matters relating to the
biogas site, so that I can push forward local views.

I have the following additional updates to report.

At yesterday’s meeting, Phil Mason acknowledged that the
Council’s Highways Officers were stretched and he agreed that, instead of using
in-house staff, he would commission a highways expert to review the state of
the roads through Higher Fraddon, etc, and investigate the technical
possibilities for an access directly off the A30.

Phil Mason also agreed that he would sanction a census of
existing traffic movements through Higher Fraddon and surrounding areas, as
background data to aid future discussions around the biogas plant, etc.

My article in last week’s Cornish Guardian covered the
issues facing the people of Higher Fraddon because of the construction of a
biogas plant and the redevelopment of a pig farm. It was as follows:

In my time as a Cornwall Councillor, I have been involved
with a wide range of planning matters in my local area and across Cornwall as a whole.
Sadly, many of my recent experiences have left me extremely jaded.

One debacle is still unfolding at Higher Fraddon, where an
AD (anaerobic digestion) or biogas plant is being developed next to a pig farm.
The plant will create gas from pig slurry mixed with other organic materials.

There is a great deal of anger in the area, as shown by the
fact that more than 120 residents crammed into Kingsley Village, last Thursday,
for a public meeting that I had organised and which was attended by senior
representatives of Cornwall Council, as well as spokespeople for both the
company developing the biogas plant and the actual pig farm.

Some editions of the Cornish Guardian have covered the
dispute in recent weeks, but I wanted to further outline some aspects of what
has happened in this column.

The original planning permission for the biogas plant was
granted in early 2009 by the old County Council. I was not involved in the deliberations,
(as I was not a county councillor at the time), but I do recall some of the
local discussions.

Concerns were raised about the poor road access through
Higher Fraddon to the pig farm, but it was claimed that the plant would take
all the pig slurry from farm – which would no longer be spread on local fields
– reducing odour, while the number of vehicle movements would be reduced.

Work started on the construction of the biogas plant in the
summer, while the redevelopment of the pig farm – now in a separate ownership –
was also commenced (but without planning permission). The biogas plant even
decided to dig up the road to lay a gas pipe along the road – instead of
through a field as previously agreed.

And as a consequence of three different lots of construction
traffic, local residents have had a nightmare of a summer – with traffic,
noise, dust and flies amongst the problems.

The original consent restricted the number of vehicle
movements (to the pig farm and plant, once operational) to no more than
51 “two-way” traffic movements each week. But it has recently transpired
that Cornwall Council had agreed a “non-material amendment” (NMA) in 2013, on
which I, the Parish Council and local residents had not been consulted.

The NMA basically allowed some of the vehicles to be larger.
For example, the original conditions set out there would be five 44-tonne
lorries each week, but the NMA allowed this to be increased to 13.

The original application also stated that 6,150 tonnes of
bakery and brewery waste would be brought in to mix with the slurry, but the
developer is now stating that he intends to bring in 38,700 tonnes of
feedstock, a six-fold increase – much of it specially grown maize silage.

I consider all this to be extremely “material” and I am
challenging how such changes were allowed to be made.

I also understand that the developer wishes to again modify
the nature of his agreed 51 vehicle movements, by further increasing the number
of 40-tonne or 44-tonne lorries – something which fills me and local residents
with great trepidation.

Residents are extremely worried about the devastating impact
of such large vehicles on the road past their properties – which everyone
considers to be a “lane” – and we are now campaigning for an alternative access
off the A30 running past Fraddon, in order to protect the amenity of local
residents.

And earlier this year, the developer asked the Council to
agree a further NMA which reduced the size of the three large tanks on the
site. But when they were completed in October, it became apparent that the
tanks were taller than agreed and had not been constructed in compliance with
the agreed plans.

I could go on and on, but it would take many thousands of
words to fully detail what has been happening at Higher Fraddon.

But I trust that what I have written this week does help to
explain why I feel very despairing at the moment and why many residents of St
Enoder Parish feel let down by Cornwall Council and the developers working on
the pig farm and biogas plant at Higher Fraddon.

Tuesday, 28 October 2014

In my monthly report (below), it notes how I have, with the assistance of the Parish Council Chairman Michael Hopkins, completed an update report on progress towards the 75 Action Points agreed in the 2008 St Enoder Parish Plan.

My report for tonight’s meeting of St Enoder Parish Council, covering the time period of 23rd September to 24th October 2014, is as follows:

1. Council meetings

I have attended a range of meetings over the last month. These included: Full Council, Strategic Planning Committee, Central Sub-Area Planning Committee, Reputation and Performance Portfolio Advisory Committee, Constitution and Governance Committee, and Group Leaders (2),

2. St Enoder Neighbourhood Plan

The closing date for returns of the questionnaire for the St Enoder Neighbourhood Plan was 4th October, and I am pleased that we have had a reasonable response. I also attended the third consultation event at Fraddon (30th September).

3. St Enoder Parish Plan – update report

I have, with the assistance of the Parish Council Chairman Michael Hopkins, completed an update report on progress towards the 75 Action Points agreed in the 2008 St Enoder Parish Plan. What has been achieved over the last six years – in relation to the Plan – is quite impressive and something which we should all be proud of.

4. Penare Pig Farm, Higher Fraddon and associated AD plant

At the last meeting of the Parish Council, I presented a detailed report about the concerns relating to the development of the AD plant and the pig farm at Penare Farm, Higher Fraddon. Over the last five weeks, I have received numerous further representations from local people and I have been in regular liaison with Cornwall Council planners, as well as representatives of Greener for Life, FLI Contracting and the pig farm.

My recent work on this issue can be summarised as follows:

- Challenge to 2013 “non-material amendment”

Last month, I reported that a “non-material amendment” had been agreed between the developer and Cornwall Council, which had not been presented to me as local member or to the Parish Council. It modified the nature of the restricted vehicle movements and the extent of the imported feedstocks.

For example, the number of staff cars had been reduced from ten to two per week, while the number of 44-tonne articulated lorries had been increased from five to 13. The actual alterations were reported in detail in my September report.

The consequences of these changes is very significant, particularly in relation to the amount of material being brought to the site.

The planning permission for the biogas, as agreed in 2009, stated that the approximate volume of feedstocks would be as below:

· Slurry from pigs – 7,800 tonnes

· Water – 9,560 tonnes

· Bakery waste – 5,480 tonnes

· Brewery waste – 500 tonnes

· Glycerol – 160 tonnes

Greener for Life have confirmed that they now plan to take 3,000 tonnes of pig slurry from the farm and to import 38,700 tonnes of other materials onto the site. This equates to a sixfold increase in imported feedstock.

I have formally challenged Cornwall Council as to how such significant changes could have been agreed through a “non-material amendment.”

Greener for Life have confirmed to me that the figures within the NMA do not accurately reflect what they wish to do, and that they are working on revised figures.

- “Open-air” meeting at Penare (2nd October)

Following the last Parish Council meeting, I requested that the future operators of the biogas plant (Greener for Life) and their present contractors (FLI Energy) hold a meeting with local residents, specifically to address concerns about the construction works. It was held at the biogas plant. Greener for Life was represented by John Deane and FLI Energy was represented by Dave Madders. Approximately fifty local residents attended the meeting and many people were angry with what has been happening in recent months, as well as fearful of what the future may hold for them.

I will acknowledge that the meeting was chaotic, but I used the opportunity to inform the local residents that I was working to arrange a number of meetings in the near future. I informed them that this would include a formal public meeting, which would be attended by representatives from Greener for Life, planning agents for the pig farm (who will soon be submitting a retrospective planning application for the site) and Cornwall Council – see below.

- Residents’ public meeting (15th October)

Early in October, local residents formed themselves into the Higher Fraddon Residents Action Group. They produced a circular raising a number of concerns, which they distributed across the affected area. This paperwork was made available to Parish Councillors at the Planning Committee meeting on 14th October.

They also organised a meeting at the Indian Queens Wesley Church Hall on 15th October. I attended this meeting along with Parish Council Chairman Michael Hopkins.

- Meeting with representatives of Greener for Life, the pig farm and Cornwall Council (17th October)

I organised a meeting to raise concerns with Greener for Life, the pig farm and Cornwall Council, in advance of a formal public meeting at which they had agreed to attend. People at the meeting included David Manley and John Deane (Greener for Life); Nick Dymond (owner of site of biogas plant); Russell Dodge (Business Location Services, planning agent for pig farm) and Dan Johns (manager of pig farm); Tim Warne (Cornwall Council, planning officer) and Rick Clayton (Cornwall Council, highways officer). Alongside myself, Michael Hopkins also attended on behalf of St Enoder Parish Council).

- Meeting between local residents and Cornwall Council (23rd October)

I also organised a meeting at the Indian Queens Victory Hall between Phil Mason (Head of Planning and Enterprise), Nigel Doyle (Assistant Head of Planning and Regeneration) and Tim Warne of Cornwall Council, with a delegation of local residents, to discuss concerns relating to the planning process and subsequent enforcement matters, etc.

The representatives of Cornwall Council gave a number of commitments at the meeting. These included:

- Looking in detail at the case for an alternative access off the A30 and how central government could be lobbied.
- Assessing the nature of the road to Higher Fraddon, through Highways.
- Reviewing the number and nature of vehicle movements through the retrospective planning application expected for the pig farm.
- Looking in detail at how concerns about traffic and other issues could be mitigated through planning controls linked to the retrospective planning application expected for the pig farm.

- Formal public meeting

The public meeting referred to above has been arranged for Thursday 30th October at Kingsley Village. The meeting will commence at 7.00.

- Contact with MP about alternative access to the site

At the meetings noted above, I agreed to contact Stephen Gilbert (MP for St Austell and Newquay) about making representations to the Department of Transport and the Highway Agency. He has agreed to help us make whatever representations local people deem appropriate.

- Patching

Cormac visited Higher Fraddon on the 15th October to assess the condition of the road and what patching would be appropriate. At the present time, I am exploring when the works could be done and with the least disturbance to local residents.

5. Indian Queens School

Cornwall Council has granted planning permission for five much-needed additional classrooms at the site. As reported last month, I remain disappointed that the “traffic management plan” produced by consultants for the unitary authority did not take adequate notice of the worries of local residents concerning the existing problems with traffic and congestion.

While application was being considered, I made representations and was able to secure some assurances that they would continue to consider changes to the “traffic management plan” and, potentially, the addition of extra car parking.

This was confirmed in a letter from Paul Solway, to the planning officer, as follows:

The Council is committed to ensuring the success of School Travel Plans and is committed to monitoring their performance through regular monitoring and review systems. In general terms Travel Plans are intended to find alternative methods of travelling to school other than by private car journeys that terminate at the school gates. However there may be circumstances for schools where such matters are not successful and in such instances the monitoring and review requirements, which are secured by planning conditions, are intended to find ways of reducing car travel.

In the case of Indian Queens we consider that the reduction of the number of vehicles that enter the Suncrest Estate is a priority in terms of reducing the impact of peak school travel times on the local community.

However, we do recognise the concerns of Cornwall Councillor Dick Cole and local residents from the surrounding area, who wish for there to be an increase in parking provision for those vehicles who do travel to the school gates in order to reduce conflict with the owners of properties around the school.

I will give an assurance that in the coming months, we will monitor the situation and if the actions contained within the submitted Travel Plan are not securing the relevant reductions in traffic, we will investigate the provision of additional parking facilities within the proximity of the school.

It is important to note that, should it be agreed that more car parking is needed, a further planning application may not be required as potentially the works (on school / Cornwall Council land) could be undertaken as a permitted development.

I have personally given this assurance to Cllr Cole and look forward to liaising with him in the coming months.

6. Gaverigan Manor Farm wind turbine

I attended the meeting of the Central Sub-Area Planning Committee on 29th September. In previous weeks, I had given advice to the landowners as well as the nearest local objectors and assisted with the production of a statement for the meeting from St Enoder Parish Council. Cllr Mark Morcom attended the meeting and spoke on behalf of the Parish Council.

Issues raised by myself, the Parish Council and local residents included landscape impacts, concerns about noise impacts and flicker. The Committee did not debate these concerns to any great degree and it was passed by eight votes to five with one abstention.

7. Gaverigan Manor Farm wind turbine – community payment

Clean Earth Energy who successfully gained planning permission for the wind turbine at Gaverigan Manor Farm have set out a commitment to pay £6,000 per annum to local projects.

Following the meeting of the Central Sub-Area Planning Committee, I asked representatives of Clean Earth Energy whether they would be willing to pay this funding to the Parish Council to support capital projects in the Parish. I received the following response:

I can confirm that Clean Earth (CE) will make £6k annual community contribution over the anticipated 20 year term of the project, as stated in the planning statement. I also confirm that we shall index link the payment with RPI, such that it’s “inflation-proofed” over the full period.

The payment will be made annually in arrears, and made for the "direct benefit" of the local community.

Clean Earth do not wish to be involved in the fund allocation decision making process. In respect of each project, we consider it imperative that local beneficiaries are determined on their own merits – with no input from CE (other than provision of funds) whatsoever.

We tend not to allow Parish Councils to determine the distribution of funds, especially where there has been no positive engagement within the project. Instead we would allow [the landowners] a primary role, especially given their understanding of local issues and requirements - perhaps in conjunction with a small, independent allocation board.

As the turbine is unlikely to be erected until Q2 2015, there’s a fair amount of time to get the details resolved.

8. Goonabarn (first) wind turbine – community payment

Members will recall that when planning permission for two wind turbines was consented at Goonabarn, a legal agreement to pay an annual community payment to the local area had not been agreed. Members will also recall that I approached the landowner, John Richards, who gave me a personal assurance that he would nonetheless pay £2,500 (per turbine) to the Parish Council each year.

I can report that I have written an agreement between the landowner’s company and the Parish Council, in respect of the first turbine. The agreement has been signed by Mr Richards and Cllr Hopkins, and we have received our first payment of £2,500.

Mr Richards has also confirmed that he will sign a similar agreement for the second turbine, once it has been erected.

9. “Chytane” wind turbine

The Cornwall Council decision to refuse planning permission for a wind turbine on farmland near Chytane was upheld at a recent planning appeal (30th September 2014).

The reasons which the inspector gave to uphold the decision to refuse the consent including landscape impacts, impact on St Enoder Church (a Grade I Listed Building), concerns about noise and harm to the living condition of local residents.

In terms of noise, the Inspector noted concerns about the existing turbine at Melbur, and stated: “It appears to me that there is no prospect of framing a condition which would ensure effective control of what the residents of Chytane Farm consider now to be an unacceptable impact upon their living conditions and what they consider would be an enhanced and cumulative effect if the appeal proposal goes ahead.”

And in his concluding section, he added: “There would be less than substantial harm to the significance of a Grade I heritage asset; one therefore of the most value to the nation’s heritage. In addition, there would be the harm to the character of the landscape … and the harm to the living conditions of nearby residents that cannot be overcome by any suggested condition … in my judgement the benefits of the proposal would not be such that the overall balance falls in favour of the appeal proposal.”

10. Solar farm at Burthy

The Cornwall Council decision to refuse planning permission for a large solar farm on farmland near Burthy was overturned at a recent planning appeal (30th September 2014).

The key issues related to the effect that the development would have on “(a) the landscape character and visual amenity of the area; and (b) the best and most versatile agricultural land.”

The Inspector reported that: “I do not consider that the limited discernable effect that there would be on landscape character and visual amenity as a result of either the development itself or the appeal proposal in combination with the other solar farms nearby would amount to the substantial harm.”

He also confirmed that he gave “limited” weight to the development of land that was 52% Grade 3A farmland.

11. Solar farm at Burthy – community payment

Prior to the application being assessed by Cornwall Council, the applicant signed a unilateral undertaking to pay Cornwall Council “the sum of seven thousand pounds (£7,000) per MW of installed capacity on the site within 30 days of the commencement of commercial operations,” which would need to be spent for the benefit of St Enoder Parish.

I have already started to make enquiries about how the funds will be allocated, once the solar panels have become operational.

12. Unauthorised development on land adjacent to the Kelliers

At the last meeting, I reported how land immediately to the east of the Kelliers was being developed without planning permission, and that I had been in regular contact with the Council’s enforcement officer.

Since then, on Saturday 4th October, the landowner put three caravans into the site and I understand that two of these are now being occupied. I am continuing to make regular representations to the enforcement officers.

I can further report that Cornwall Council placed some large boulders on the land opposite the entrance to the site, which was cleared without the permission of the unitary authority.

13. Works on the local road network

At Parish Council meetings over the last six months, I have reported on a range of planned works on local roads.

Patching around Burthy and Chytane has been completed.

The ditch in Higher Fraddon was cleared in July but the water does not appear to be draining away through the pipe which local residents say is there. Cormac have visited the site and are investigating what can be done.

I am also continuing to push for patching or further patching in the following areas:

Barton Lane, Fraddon
Trevarren village

14. Old Stamps Hill

In July, I reported that Cornwall Council had agreed to clear the dumped rubble at the junction of the closed-off Stamps Hill (at the Gaverigan roundabout). I am pleased that a new gate has been installed, to hopefully discourage the ongoing flytipping in this area. I have had it confirmed that the rubble should be removed within November.

15. Inquiries

Throughout the last month, I have also helped numerous people and local organisations with advice and guidance on a wide range of issues. These include everything from parking to traffic matters, benefit problems and housing issues, to Japanese Knotweed and overgrown hedges.