Go back a week to an article in the NY Times (Link).
The guts of this story is that the Administration is working on a
plan to Re-Fi residential mortgages on a massive scale.

When I first read this, I ignored it. The scope of the proposal
was too large. There was also (IMHO) a fatal flaw. The thinking
was that the jumbo ReFi would be made available to only those who
had a mortgage that ended up with either Fannie or Freddie. I ask
the question, "What about those poor odds and sods who have a
mortgage with a community bank?” Do they get nothing while those
who owe F/F big bucks get a break? Where is
the fairness in that result?

But every day since the NYT story, I have heard the rumblings
about some deal being done. It has already impacted MBS spreads.
It's back in the news today with an article in the WSJ.
(Link)
I have to believe that where there is smoke, there is probably
some fire.

I went back to the NYT piece. There are some clues. First is that
Louise Story wrote the article. She is a fine reporter. Anything
that she says has been supported by “real”
sources. "Who were these sources?" is a question to ask. Some
words from the piece:

Administration officials said on Wednesday that they were
weighing a range of proposals.

Read this to mean that people in the Administration deliberately
planted this story. This was a “trail balloon” approach. This is
very typical for this administration. They leak their intentions
in advance. More from the NYT:

But refinancing could have far greater breadth, saving
homeowners, by one estimate, $85 billion a year.

The following chart was included in the NYTs article.

The information in the chart and the very precise estimate of
“85 billion a year” can only have come from one
source. It has to be the FHFA that is doing the talking
to the NYT. It had to come from the most senior level.
That HAS
to mean that it came from the Acting Director, Edward
DeMarco.

The NYT functionally confirmed the source of the article as
DeMarco with this written quote from him:

“F.H.F.A. remains open to all ideas that provide needed
assistance to borrowers” while minimizing the cost to taxpayers,
Mr. DeMarco said in a written statement.

Now consider some of the wording in the WSJ article today.
Note: This article was written, in part, by Jon
Hilsenrath. Jon is well known to be a mouthpiece for the Fed. He
gets his thinking directly from Bernanke. Some quotes:

There are several reasons why refinancing has been weak,
say Fed officials.

Some Fed officials say that it would be in
Fannie and Freddie's financial interest to allow borrowers who
are current on their mortgages to refinance at lower rates
because it would increase the likelihood that they won't default.

Officials at the Federal Reserve are frustrated
that they've pushed interest rates to the lowest levels in
decades and yet many borrowers haven't been able to take
advantage.

You can take these quotes to the bank. They are from
Bernanke. It is Bernanke that is frustrated that
his low interest rate policy has not resulted in more ReFi’s.
You can also take as a fact that Bernanke wants something
done on mortgage relief.

One other fact in the picture. The new IMF head, Christine
Lagarde, spoke on the phone to Obama before her speech at Jackson
Hole. She must have told the Big O that a program to clear up
America’s mortgage mess was her top priority. She made
that very clear in her speech the following day.

Okay. Put these pieces together. What do you
have? Assume for the sake of discussion that the President does
announce a major new initiative to ReFi F/F mortgages. Assume
further that the cost of the millions of ReFi’s would come from
existing sources (the $35b of already issued and funded Hope Now
Bonds), or better yet, the costs would be crammed down the neck
of the banks who are servicing the loans (necessary to get
DeMarco to go along). Say, for the sake of discussion, that the
targeted mortgages are those who have not yet defaulted, but are
desperately in need of a break. That amount would come to about
$1.4 Trillion. This is a very big amount. Assume finally that the
new mortgage rate would be about 4%. This (if accomplished) would
be a very big shot in the arm for the economy as a whole.

Now do a flow of funds for this mega transaction.

I) Homeowners get a new loan at 4% and payoff
100% of the old mortgage.

II) The servicing banks get the proceeds and pay
off the old loan.

III) The money is paid to F/F. This money is
used to redeem existing mortgage pools of Agency MBS.

IV) Fannie/Freddie have the same asset mix at
the end of the day. They still need to finance the new 4%
mortgages they are writing.

V) Fannie and Freddie are taking on substantial
new risk as they now have a book of 4% mortgages and are much
more at risk to rising interest rates.

VI) It takes 90 days for a new mortgage to
become a new Agency MBS. During this period F/F warehouse these
loans. They finance the warehouse with short-term debt. They take
action to reduce their risk by entering into new swap
transactions or by buying derivatives to neutralize the market
risk.

VII) As the process goes on huge chunks of
EXISTING higher
coupon MBS are prepaid. Investors in those MBS securities
will be forced to re-invest the proceeds.

So who is going to be the biggest recipient of the cash pre-pays?
That’s easy to answer. It’s the Federal Reserve. They currently
own 1.0 Trillion of Agency MBS. A very substantial
portion of the total prepayments of F/F MBS will be paid to the
Fed.The Fed’s
balance sheet will shrink very rapidly as a result.

The Fed has already established what will happen when principal
is prepaid on their holdings of MBS. The have said they will
reinvest any proceeds back into new purchases of US Treasury
securities. As this chart of the Fed’s holdings show, this has
already happened to the tune of $250 billion. The new proposal
for the mega ReFi will dramatically reduce the MBS holdings. It
will force the Fed back into the market to purchase big
amounts of Treasury bonds. This process will take at
least a year. But the total amounts could easily exceed $600
billion (QE2 size).

There is a flaw in this logic. On a macro basis, total
mortgages loans remain the same. This is only a re-pricing. Not a
reduction of total debt. The reality is that the Fed will be
buying more treasury bonds, but F/F will have to be selling new
bonds to protect themselves against interest rate risk. What will
be happening is that the Fed is buying to reduce interest rates
while at the same time F/F will be buying protection in the form
of swaps, options and new term funding. So the real consequence
to the credit markets will be a wash.

There is one solution to this dilemma that achieves the desired
outcome. The Fed could easily enter into the swaps/options with
F/F to eliminate their basis risk. Think of this as a different
version of “Operation Twist”. The Fed wants to reduce long-term
interest rates. It does not matter to them if they do it with
direct purchase of bonds or if they absorb future interest rate
risk by writing derivatives that would neutralize the market
impact.

The Fed can’t write $1 trillion of interest rate swaps to the
street in order to achieve this objective. There would be far too
much counter-party risk for the Fed to do this. But they
have no counter party risk with F/F. At the end of the
day F/F is the government, so the Fed can say they have no
counter-party concerns. The bulk of this would be financed by F/F
in short-term markets. The swaps and options with the Fed would
alleviate the market risk they would face from the ReFi’s.

Who would be APPOSED to this plan? No one that I can
think of. DeMarco would be able to say that the plan
protects the taxpayers from future losses. Obama would say that
he has created a new stimulus of $85 billion a year.
Bernanke would love this plan. He
would be “Forced” into buying a new big amount of Treasuries.
He would have his excuse for QE3 handed to him.
That the Fed would be forced to absorb new risk of loss to rising
interest rates is of no concern to the Fed. They are in so deep
today, another $1 trillion of notional risk would not change the
picture. Keep in mind that the Fed is very anxious to
pull the next trigger.

Who would be the sources of SUPPORT for a plan like this?
Everyone but some Republicans is the answer.
DeMarco (FHFA) would get what he wants. Obama would get what he
wants (10,000,000 homeowners would love him). The economy WOULD
benefit from this as consumers would have new cash in their
pockets. Bernanke would get everything he wants (a new QE), and
would have the political cover for his efforts.

The only voice of dissent will come from Republicans in the
House. But it is very likely that this could all happen
without a vote. From the NYT piece:

The idea is appealing because it would not necessarily require
Congressional action.

There are too many pieces of this pie to ignore. This is a
solution to problems that are both political and economic. I see
no significant opposition. Republicans will scream “foul”, but
who cares. This can happen over their objections.

I'm looking for something along these lines to be announced soon.
It will come in the President’s upcoming speech. None other than
Ben
Bernanke will be the biggest supporter. That makes it a very
feasible outcome.

Will this work? I’m not convinced. I think this
is the ultimate "kick the can down the road". But that is the
only strategy that is in place today. Delay the inevitable; win
the next election. That is the only thing that matters in
D.C.