United States v. Camacho

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,v.JUAN CAMACHO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Court: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT, AND SETTING FURTHER STATUS CONFERENCE DATE

On May 19, 2009, the parties appeared before the Court for a status conference. Assistant United States Attorney Samuel Wong appeared on behalf of plaintiff United States of America. Mark Reichel, Esq., appeared with his client, defendant Luis Humberto Lopez-Avilez. J. Toney, Esq., appeared with his client, defendant Juan Camacho.

The parties requested that the matter be continued to August 11, 2009, at 9:15 a.m., for further status conference to allow each defense counsel additional time to prepare his respective client's case due to the unusual and complex nature of this case, especially as it relates to the amount of discovery involved in this court authorized wiretap case. The parties requested and agreed that time from May 19, 2009, to, and including, August 11, 2009, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to Local Code T2.

Based on the representations and stipulations of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court sets a new status conference hearing on August 11, 2009, at 9:15 a.m. The Court orders that time from May 19, 2009, to, and including, August 11, 2009, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to Local Code T2.

The Court continues to affirm its previous finding that this case is unusual and complex. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and defendants in a speedy trial.

Our website includes the first part of the main text of the court's opinion.
To read the entire case, you must purchase the decision for download. With purchase,
you also receive any available docket numbers, case citations or footnotes, dissents
and concurrences that accompany the decision.
Docket numbers and/or citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a
legal proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision. If the document contains a simple affirmation or denial without discussion,
there may not be additional text.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.