CVS difference for arm/source/07.mss

--- arm/source/07.mss 2005/05/07 05:18:26 1.46+++ arm/source/07.mss 2005/05/15 06:35:34 1.47@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
@Part(07, Root="ada.mss")
-@Comment{$Date: 2005/05/07 05:18:26 $}+@Comment{$Date: 2005/05/15 06:35:34 $}
@LabeledSection{Packages}
@Comment{$Source: e:\\cvsroot/ARM/Source/07.mss,v $}
-@Comment{$Revision: 1.46 $}+@Comment{$Revision: 1.47 $}
@begin{Intro}
@redundant[@ToGlossaryAlso{Term=<Package>,
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@
@RefSec{Type Declarations}, as all types now have them. This definition
isn't marked as redundant only because we didn't want to have to add
and delete the sentence in question (making a phony change), and that
- would be necessary to add redunant brackets.]}+ would be necessary to add redundant brackets.]}
@end{TheProof}
@Redundant[A type shall be completely defined before it is frozen
@@ -1729,7 +1729,7 @@
@ChgAdded{Version=[2],Text=[For a @nt{function_call}, we only require
@i{build-in-place}@Defn{build-in-place} for a limited type that would have
been a return-by-reference type in Ada 95. We do this because
-@Chg{Version=[2],New=[],Old=[Tucker said so ]}we want to mimimize disruption+@Chg{Version=[2],New=[],Old=[Tucker said so ]}we want to minimize disruption
to Ada 95 implementations and users.]}
@end{Discussion}
@end{ImplReq}