The EU tried to end austerity measures in the UK, but Brexiteers don’t want that!

“We are dominated by the relatively small number of persons who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.”

Edward Bernays

As Rudyard Kipling pointed out in 1902, whoever seeks the truth they must examine “six honest serving-men”, called What, Why, When, Who, Where and How!

Every single human incited event (What) occurs because of a specific reason (Why) that takes place at a particular time (When), affecting certain entities (Who) located within a specific region (Where) that use a certain method (How) to accomplish an objective that’s beneficial to them.

The following text provides a concise overview of Brexit’s Why, What, When, Who, Where and How.

1. WHAT HAPPENED THAT LED TO THE EU REFERENDUM?

Following the EU’s decision to bail out Greece from bankruptcy, the EURO plummeted threatening the economic stability of the Eurozone.

Later, the “Lagard List” the names of wealthy Greek citizens and businesses who contributed to the Greek crisis by avoiding to pay their taxes, whereby the amount of the annual revenue lost was estimated to range between €26 billion and €29 billion.

The inability of Greek authorities to curb tax avoidance prompted Brussels to take action and end tax-avoiding practices by companies and individuals that generate income within the EU countries.

Speaking at the G20 summit press conference in 2011, the French President, Nicola Sarkozy declared that tax havens will no longer be tolerated and countries that continue to protect them, such as the UK, will be outcast from the developed economies.

David Cameron resisted calls for an EU referendum, but after the European Commission released the first draft of EU’s Anti Tax Avoidance Directive, the British Prime Minister changed his mind and within a month he called the EU referendum.

2. WHY DID DAVID CAMERON’S REMAIN CAMPAIGN FAIL AT THE EU REFERENDUM?

David Cameron’s Remain campaign could have easily secured the majority of British votes to stay in the EU by informing the British public that by remaining in the EU, the British government would have to implement the new EU Anti Tax Avoidance Directive, which would have saved the NHS and end the ongoing harsh austerity measures.

However, David Cameron was fond of wealthy tax-dodging individuals (such as the right-wing press) who either campaigned for him to become a Prime Minister or served as his advisors, which is probably why he refused to use his strongest card during his Remain campaign.

David Cameron was keen on protecting tax-dodging practices in the UK, which is why in 2013, he wrote to the then president of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy requesting from him not to drag offshore trusts into an EU-wide crackdown on tax avoidance.

Ultimately, David Cameron inherited his a house in North Kensington, worth £2.000.000 at the time and £300,000 from his father, Ian Cameron a long term tax-dodger, who expanded his wealth by running an offshore fund in Bahamas.

3. WHEN DID DAVID CAMERON CALL THE EU REFERENDUM?

In 2012, David Cameron declared he is prepared to consider the EU referendum, however “only when the time is right”, and his momentous announcements on the EU referendum coincide with the key milestones of development of the new EU Anti Tax Avoidance Directive, whereas:

• In 2013, the European Commission produced their action plan to clamp down on tax avoidance, and within a month, David Cameron announced that he changed his mind, stating that he favours an EU referendum and that he will be ” pushing to exempt Europe’s smallest entrepreneurial companies from more EU Directives.”

And, again rather than informing the British public that of the new EU Anti Tax Avoidance Directive, the tax-dodging practices that are responsible for the ongoing harsh austerity measures would soon come to an end, he announced the date for the EU Referendum.

4. WHO SUPPORTED BREXIT?

Tax-dodgers are greedy individuals who couldn’t care less if the British people are being subjected to harsh austerity measures, living on discriminatory food banks or losing their NHS, yet ahead of the EU referendum, they became extremely patriotic and generous by donating vast amounts of money to the Leave camp.

According to The Business Insider UK, the long list of prominent individuals who donated generous amounts to the Leave campaign, and have been implicated in tax-avoiding practices, include:• Lord Farmer who donated £300,000;• Peter Cruddas who donated £350,000;• Lord Bamford who donated £673,000;• Crispin Odey who donated £873,288;• Lord Edmiston who donated £1,000,000;• Peter Hargreaves who donated £3,200,000;• Arron Banks who donated £8,106, 375.

5. WHERE DID BREXIT TAKE PLACE?

Brexit took place in the UK, a country that is proud of being the world’s fifth largest economy, but at the same time it subjects its nation to austerity measures and food banks, because similar to Greece, the UK authorities are unable to collect due taxes.

According to The Guardian, in the year 2015, Inland Revenue failed to collect an estimated £16,000,000,000 in taxes, whereby £12,000,000,000 are lost in tax evasion or avoidance.

Of course, tax-avoiding practices are legal in the UK, but if we were to remain in the EU or in the single market and the customs union, the UK would have to implement new EU laws, such as the EU Anti Tax Avoidance Directive, which would force the companies to pay the exit charge whenever they removed their capital gains from the EU member state to another low tax jurisdiction, such as a British tax haven.

New EU laws would force a UK registered company, such as Rupert Murdoch’s Sun newspaper to pay an exit charge, every time its capital gains are relocated to another tax jurisdiction outside the EU, such as Cayman Islands, Bermuda and the British Virgin Islands, because the British overseas territories are part of the UK, but not part of the EU!

This was also confirmed by the most prominent Brexiteer, Nigel Farage who accused the EU Commission of attempting to “drive a wedge between the United Kingdom and the Channel Islands, the Isle of Man and the Caymans”, adding:

“There’s a great degree of unity here this morning, a common enemy: rich people, successful companies evading tax, which of course is a problem, avoiding tax, which is not illegal, but it gives this whole chamber this morning a high moral tone and, as Mr Barrasso says, it’s all about the perception of fairness.”

6. HOW DID BREXIT HAPPEN?

It seems that the British elite is fond of George Orwell’s “1984”, so they turned it into reality, whereby the invisible decision makers, “The Party” turned our democracies into “Oceania” and MSM into “The Thought Police”, whose role is to inflict fear upon the British people.

Every time tax-free assets of the wealthy elite are threatened by the EU or British politicians, “The Thought Police” also known as the right-wing media, infects the British people with the fear virus about an imaginary threat from that comes from subjects or individuals that are keen to deliver equality and social cohesion in the UK.

The owner of the Daily Mail newspaper, Lord Rothermere avoided paying his taxes by inheriting the Daily Mail through an offshore trust set up in the Channel Island tax haven and is registered as “non-dom”.

About the author

Nolan Jazimreg

Nolan Jazimreg is the author of “The Inconvenient Truth”, a highly contentious dystopian novel, which portrays the life of Isa Iri, an orphan tasked with the daunting mission of uniting the humankind through unconventional insights on happiness, freedom, democracy, religion, and ways in which heaven or hell manifest throughout our lives.

Having undergone a unique and rare life experience, Nolan Jazimreg developed a bipolar condition and setbacks that transcended him into the parallel spiritual realm, which due the “veil” bestowed upon them, most adults can’t experience.

Jazimreg was born to an award-winning TV journalist mother, whereas his father worked as Professor of Psychology at the local University.

Jazimreg spent his childhood in a communist system, then his teenage years in socialist one and his adult life in the capitalism.

Before turning 18, Jazimreg met a wonderful person who fulfilled him, but because of religious differences, he was deprived of his first love.

Jazimreg belonged to an ethnic minority and just like others who spoke the same language as did, were discriminated by his state or other individuals that were an ethnic majority.

Gradually, the ethnic tension erupted into a civil war that forced Jazimreg to flee his home and became a refugee in London.

Hoping that it might aspire younger generations to create a better, just and a peaceful world, unlike the painful one that he journeyed through, Jazimreg began inscribing his first novel that reveals unique experiences and a vision about a different civilization that could be accomplished in the future.

Coinciding with his novels, this blog reveals profound insights into how hatred infiltrates us and oppresses our adeptness to live a contented life that will instigate a comprehensive appraisal of preconceived assumptions about happiness, freedom, democracy, religion, but also heaven and hell, the neglected realms that we experience during our lifetimes, but are unaware of it. ___________________________

“Being a literature major and an occasional writer myself, I am only too aware of how writers are often very shy to the point of being secretive. It is therefore amazing how Nolan Jazimreg, in his second novel, lifts the "veil" (reminiscent of Shelley's) of the "parallel spiritual realm" whereby he was "transcended" by his condition and its ensuing "setbacks". His aim, in his first novel, is truly admirable--it is to "inspire younger generations to create a better, just and peaceful world, unlike the painful one that he journeyed through". Writing these novels were acts of courage, motivated by a selfless desire to spare the generations that are to come after him, from the wrenching pain of growing up from childhood to adulthood, in 3 political systems that are worlds apart, esp. the first and the third. May we laud him for not allowing the loss of his first love and the discrimination he underwent, to embitter and disillusion him. Most people are afraid of what lies behind the "veil", esp. if, by lifting it, the truth will be revealed in all its brilliance. It takes a writer, a courageous one at that, to dare, and to look at the truth. Instead, he has taken the positive step of writing and publishing these experiences, an example some of us would do well to follow. “ Ethel David