From Edward Dilly

[dateline] London March 4th 1774

[salute] Dear Sir

The Letters you sent for Mrs. Macaulay directed, under Cover, for me,1 were put into the Post office on Capt Scott's arrival at Dover, and on their coming
to my Hands I immediately transmitted the same to Mrs. Macaulay. You mentioned in
your Letter to her, that you had sent the Proceeding of the Assemb[l]y relative to Certain Letters, but upon examining the Packet, they were not inclosed.2 I applied to Capt Scott who said that he did not know any thing concerning them.

Mrs. Macaulay from her close application to the writing her History (Viz. The 6th
Volume containing the Hist of Charles the Second) is now much indisposed, and obliged
to go to Bath on Account of her Health,3 she has however found some benefit by Drinking the Waters, and requested me to present
her best Compliments to you, and inform you that she will imbrace the earliest Opportunity
(when her Health will permit) to Answer your last favour, and likewise that of the
Bostonian Lady, in the mean Time I send you inclosed a Letter which was written by
Mrs. Macaulay to a friend upon the necessary Qualifications for a representative in
Parliament which will be distributed upon the Eve of the General Election.4 I have also sent you a copy of Mr. Burgh's Political Disquisiti[ons] a Book just published, which the Author begs you will accept of as a small token
of his esteem for a just Character as a friend to Liberty.5 I flatter myself that you will find much pleasure in the perusal. His Ideas of Government
are very just and clear, and many useful hints may be gathered, which may furnish
sufficient matter for the establishment of a New Government upon a solid foundation.
Long Parliaments are the bane to this, as well as every other Country, nothing is
more conducive to the Welfare of a Nation as frequent Appeals to the People. We were
speaking upon this Subject a few Days ago when I had the pleasure of a Select Number
of friends to Dine with me Viz Dr Franklin, Mr Alderman Sawbridge (Brother to Mrs.
Macaulay) The Red Mr. Ewin and Dr. Williamson.6 Dr. Franklin was observing the very great difference there was between a Person's
soliciting for a Seat in Parliament in England, and in America, the former making
great Promises of what he woud do for { 19 } his Constituents, and the latter requesting that he may be excused from Serving any
longer on account of his own Affairs—the first wants either a Place or Pension, and
the other means only to serve his Country.

The Affairs relative to North America are expected to come on in the House of Commons
in a few Days, and Lord Dartmouth will lay the Papers concerning the Transactions
of Boston before the House of Lords at the same Time so that we shall know in a short
Time, what Steps the Ministry will take to Subdue what they call the Evil Spirit which
is gone forth in America, but what Others would Term a noble exertion of the just
rights of the People against Ministerial encroachments. For my own part I am inclined
to think that they will be fearful of pursueing vigorous Measures, and indeed we are
not in a Capacity of doing much,—a Treasury almost exhausted, and burdened with an
Immense National Debt. Under these Circumstances good Policy would lead me to pursue
such Steps only as will Conciliate the Affections of the Colonies to the Mother Country,
our Interest like that of Husband and Wife is reciprocal, one cannot be hurt without
the Other's being equally injured. I most sincerely Wish the breach was healed, and
that hence forward, we shall never be more at variance.

I presume you will have heard before this comes to your Hand of the Death of Mr. Thos.
Hollis the great friend of America, and who was well known by the Donations he made
to Harvard College. He has bequeathd about Ten Thousand Pounds in Legacies, among
which he has left One Hundred Pounds to Dr. Mayhew's Widow and the like Sum to Mrs.
Elliot of Boston.7 I shall be very happy to be favoured with a Line from you, when Opportunity offers,
and of being informed of the present State of Affairs in Boston, and whatever you
have for Mrs. Macaulay may be transmitted to me. I beg you will accept of my most
cordial Wishes for the Prosperity of America.

2. No letters from JA to Catharine Macaulay for the period June 1773 – March 1774 have been found. The
“Proceeding of the Assembly” referred to here was probably the Edes & Gill edition
of The Representations of Governor { 20 } Hutchinson and Others, contained in certain Letters transmitted to England . . . Together
with the Resolves of the two Houses thereon, Boston, 1773 (Evans, No. 12820).

3. Dilly had become Mrs. Macaulay's publisher after the 5th volume of her History appeared. The 6th volume was not published until 1781. For the reasons behind this
delay and for a description of her life in Bath, see Lucy M. Donnelly, “The Celebrated
Mrs. Macaulay,” WMQ, 3d ser., 6:173–207 (April 1949).

4. Mrs. Macaulay's essay on qualifications for a member of Parliament has not been found.

5. JA's copy of James Burgh, Political Disquisitions, vols. 1 and 2, London, 1774, is part of his library at MB. The flyleaf of volume 1 carries this inscription by Burgh: “London March 7th 1774
For John Adams Esqr. at Boston from the Author. As a small token of his regard for the Political Character of that Gentleman, who
has distinguished himself as a Patriot, and the true friend of Civil and Religious
Liberty.”

6. Catharine Macaulay's brother, John Sawbridge (1732?–1795), a founder of the Supporters of the Bill of Rights, had served as an alderman for
London since 1768. Later in 1774, he was returned as a member of Parliament for the
city (DNB). Rev. Ewin may have been the notorious Dr. William Howell Ewin (1731?–1804) of Cambridge
(DNB). Dr. Hugh Williamson (1735–1819) of Pennsylvania had sailed to Europe from Boston shortly after the Tea Party of Dec.
1773. On his arrival in England, he struck up a friendship with Franklin and became
his scientific collaborator (DAB).

7. Thomas Hollis (b. 1720), a benefactor of Harvard College, died on New Year's Day 1774. Until his death in
July 1766, Jonathan Mayhew, pastor of Boston's West Church, had been Hollis' principal
correspondent in Massachusetts as well as his agent in handling his donations to the
College. (See Sibley-Shipton, Harvard Graduates, 11:440–472; Bernhard Knollenberg, ed., “Thomas Hollis and Jonathan Mayhew: Their
Correspondence, 1759–1766,” MHS, Procs., 69 [1947–1950]: 102–193; Caroline Robbins, “The Strenuous Whig, Thomas Hollis of
Lincoln's Inn,” WMQ, 3d ser., 7:406–453 [July 1950].) Rev. Andrew Eliot (1718–1778), pastor of New North Church and member of the Harvard Corporation, succeeded Mayhew
as Hollis' confidant in the province (Sibley-Shipton, Harvard Graduates, 10:128–161; “Letters from Andrew Eliot to Thomas Hollis,” MHS, Colls., 4th ser., 4 [1858]: 398–461). Mayhew's widow, Elizabeth Clarke (d. 1777), married
Simeon Howard (1733–1804), her first husband's successor at West Church in Dec. 1771
(Sibley-Shipton, Harvard Graduates, 14:279–289).