I haven't yet played the game... it's waiting on my shelf at this very moment...

But surely unrealised potential in such a game can be a good thing? In a medium where sequels are generally improvements over their predecessors (something you don't often find in films), surely it's good to leave something for the future?

Or am I misunderstanding this title? I don't want to read the review for fear of spoilers. Just wondered people's opinions on this.

I think given the changes over the years in this games development and it's ending, I think they realized that it was overly ambitious. That said, It's my favorite Bioshock game and possibly fps ever for it addresses themes and concepts rarely touched in the industry. Bioshock was a fun game, but I'm not one for nostalgia to sway my comparison.

Finished the game today and I can assure you that this game is not a 10/10 or perfect. Maybe close but not perfect. The game's strength is the story[which in my opinion is the biggest], the environment/the world and creative game-play.