Will Germany Still Belong To Germans In The Near-Future?

The speed with which the German population is shrinking seems to be even too much for the statisticians of Destatis, the official German bureau of statistics, who posit that by 2060, with a zero level of net immigration, the German population will have declined to 60,2 million.

However, our research team has found out that this number is far too optimistic: in 40 years Germany will have a population of 52,6 million people, a considerable 34% drop from the current 81 million inhabitants, and by the end of the century the native German population, the indigenous people without a migration background, will have shrunk even further and be approaching 21,6 million. The explanation that Destatis has mailed us is tantamount to admitting that their projections are unrealistic.

If the German elites succeed in maintaining their population at 80 million, in 2060 the majority of naturalized Germans will have no historical relation to the nation’s ancestors who were once proud subjects of the Holy Roman Empire. Moreover, they will stand in the same relation to Albert Schweitzer, Johann Sebastian Bach, Karl Benz and Friedrich Nietzsche as Recep Tayyip Erdoğan stands to the Byzantine emperors. The excessive numbers of migrants will have altered the German nation forever.

There will be no relation between future Germans and the German past

By 2050 many of the German historical figures, like Albert Schweitzer mentioned above, will be unmasked as racists and consequently removed from street names and history books and replaced with new heroes, a process that is already taking place in the US and the Netherlands. In the former, monuments to southern generals are under attack, whereas in the latter, migrant parties are pressing for Dutch historical figures to be eradicated from public spaces, streets to be renamed and their most important traditions, which are allegedly not inclusive, oppressive or insulting to national, racial or religious minorities to be prohibited. A country’s history should be about the past deeds of its people, but when people are replaced there is no connection with the past and it may happen that before this century is out, the majority of German citizens will have their cultural roots and their ancestors outside Germany or even outside Europe.

While one may label these predictions as scaremongering, this does not make them unreliable. Demographic forecasts, granting there are no unpredictable changes like outbreaks of epidemics or famine, are remarkably accurate. Consider the comparison of the results obtained by Destatis and us for the zero-migration model.

In Germany, an average woman gives birth to 1.4 children, this is below the replacement fertility level and it has not changed much since the 1970s. This is why the German population began to shrink. The trend has been reversed due to the 1.3 million non EU-immigrants who have arrived in the country since 2015.

Cerberus 2.0 computes the future of the German population

The Gefira team developed Cerberus 2.0, a software program, to calculate how a population grows or declines in the absence of migration. Using only death and birth rates, Cerberus 2.0 can compute what the size of the German society should be without the influx of foreigners and their offspring. The application begins by doing the calculations on the basis of the 1965 census taken from Destatis. We started with the year 1965 because we wanted to measure the German population growth without immigration, and we assumed that in that year there were not that many immigrants. We did not use the official detailed Destatis data for the subsequent years because these included immigrants i.e. the factor we wanted to exclude. While Destatis gives the total numbers of migrants currently living in Germany, Cerberus 2.0 independently computes the development of each age group of the indigenous German population starting with 1965 and ending in 2100, and for all years in between.

We are aware that there are mixed relations and that there are also Germans who have left the country. Because some mixed parents will Germanize their children, while others will do the opposite, we assume that this will not affect our results. Thus, with the aid of Cerberus 2.0 we calculated that if there had been no migration, the German population of 1965 would have been 64,99 million people strong in 2013. This is confirmed by Destatis, which puts the number of Germans without a migration background for the same year at 64.29 million. It shows that our computations are extremely accurate but also that there are hardly any third generation migrants in Germany who are regarded as native Germans.

The Destatis demographic model is a mere fantasy

We also did the calculation for the years 2013-2060, taking the population of 2013 as a starting point, and compared our results with those forecast by Destatis for the same period. According to Destatis, in 2060 the population will be 60.2, while Cerberus 2.0 predicts only 52,6 million inhabitants in Germany. The enormous difference of nearly 8 million between the two forecasts can only be explained by assuming that Destatis is very creative in their demographic forecasting, as we will explain shortly.

For Germany, Cerberus 2.0 processed the death and birth rates provided by Destatis. The demographic data – the percentage of mothers who gave birth, that is the Age-Specific Fertility Rate, and the percentage of people who died – were broken down into age groups. The Age-Specific Fertility Rate for 1965 allowed Cerberus 2.0 to calculate the number of children born in the next year, which is the number of women in a particular age group multiplied by the said rate for the relevant age group. The death rate for the same year was also taken into account. Having calculated the births and deaths, the application increased the ages of each age group by one year to create the entire population of 1966 without the influence of immigration. Then the program began the whole process again to compute the data for the year 1967, the consecutive year, and so on and so forth. For the calculations beyond 2015, Cerberus 2.0 used the age-specific death and fertility rates for 2015.

We then compared the Cerberus 2.0 projections with those of Destatis. Both Destatis and our research team began with the initial population of 2013, which was 81 million, and we both used the same fertility rate of 1.4. Neither took into account the 1.3 million non-Western immigrants that entered Germany after 2014. The obtained results differed significantly: Cerberus 2.0 forecast 52,6 whereas Destatis – 60,2 million inhabitants in Germany in 2060.

Populations grow and shrink due to only four factors; births, deaths, immigration and emigration. The Cerberus 2.0 zero-migration model only uses the death and birth rates, whereas Destatis adds 600.000 young immigrants and removes 600.000 old emigrants every year from its model. That means that every year 600.000 young men and women arrive in Germany, bear children and when those children come of age the parents leave the country like cuckoos, a rather strange assumption. The consequence is that immigrants themselves do not add to the population, but their children do. In the Destatis model the immigration and emigration balance is kept at zero.

How does Destatis arrive at these numbers? In 2014 there were 331 thousand women born. After seven years this same group of women is projected by Destatis to grow to 333 thousand, and after 27 years, in 2041, it is projected to reach a peak of 350 thousand, in other words in 2021 there will be fewer women born than in 2041! How is this possible? Only if immigrant women are included in the statistics.

Since in this model there are as many migrants entering the country as leaving it, the first generation migrants do not add to the total population. However, these migrants have on average 170 thousand children annually. These children enlarge the German population, but Destatis does not regard them as foreigners. Hence, the Destatis zero immigration prognosis is false and yields a far too “rosy” projection for the future of Germany. The response from Destatis on the difference between our findings and theirs is that their projection is formally accurate and the difference is a result of the fact that we assumed a zero migration model – no migration at all, whereas they assumed a balance zero migration model.

Germany, like most of the West, is subjected to mass immigration on an unprecedented scale, and according to the new German government the process will continue for the foreseeable future.

Due to the refugee relocation, the number of the non-EU population increased by 1.3 million between January 2015 and June 2017. The new government has decided that the country should grow by 200 thousand asylum seekers annually. To understand the effect of this policy on German society, one has to compare this number with the number of German newborns. According to Cerberus 2.0, the number of native Germans that are born will decrease from about 450 thousand in 2020 to 315 thousand within the following twenty years. The addition of 200 thousand relatively young asylum seekers year after year, plus their offspring, will alter the German society profoundly within 40 to 60 years and Germany will cease to be a German country.

By the end of the century there will be 22 million Germans left

The 1965 German population will shrink to 37.8 million within the coming forty years, and to 21,6 million by the end of the century. In 2060, the number of indigenous Germans will amount to half of that of East and West Germany combined in 1945. Given the below-replacement birth rates among the indigenous people, the German governments can only keep the current number of inhabitants at 80 million by importing immigrants, thus in the long run, for all practical purposes, replacing indigenous Germans.

The idea that the new arrivals will integrate or assimilate is complete nonsense i.e. the new Germans are not going to be German. The main reason people relocate to Germany is for personal welfare rather than German culture. Immigrants maintain their religion and heritage, form political parties, build religious institutions, have their separate shops and even want to have their own legal system. Given the sheer numbers that are flocking into Germany, there is no way that the Germans can uphold their political structure, language and cultural identity.

It takes a long time for a super tanker to change course. Similarly, demographic changes are not visible until after at least 15 to 30 years. Accepting 1.3 million foreigners within two years and adding 200 thousand non-European migrants annually to the rapidly shrinking German population will already have had a devastating effect on the German population by 2030.

The results of Cerberus 2.0 show us that the discussion about migration is not about accepting and protecting the right of minorities; rather, it is about an existential question, it is about the preservation of the Germans. When the German ruling elites begin to understand their failing policies, it will be too late. There are no examples in history when these kinds of massive changes have ended well.

Churchill was worse and he murdered millions more than Hitler ever did. Yet the English still revere him as some kind of savior. They deserve what is happening to England faster than Germany anyway, and they can thank their idol.

Seems to me that babymaking is the leading indicator that really matters. They have to become aware of what's happening to them before they will fight, and the first true sign of awareness will be to start having babies again.

So long as they believe in the zio/NWO-imposed "environmentalism" and "white guilt" narratives they won't have babies, and they won't fight. They'll go out not with a bang, but a whimper.

Same applies to whites everywhere.

This will be a nice one for the historians to puzzle out, if it happens (all evidence suggests it will). How the fuck did whites go from ruling the world to insignificance, if not extinction, in a hundred years?

Doubt it mate....sometimes you (nation collectively) are required to pay for your/their foolish and wanton disregard for common sense and willingness to be led along the PC yellow brick road - this is the case for much of Western Europe; very very sadly, I think Germany has been 5th Column/Trojan Horse conquered already. Germany, even now, like France and it appears Britain and many others just lack the will to do what must be done to retake your country for the natives; in America we luckily still have the will and numbers and means to fight.

Agree we have the numbers and the means, but where is the will? Talk doesn't cut it. We're letting the zios pull us into war with Russia, which will likely seal the fate of whites everywhere.

Several hundred thousand to march against guns, the "issue" of the day, as determined by our masters. Where are the marchers against the drive to war? It's blindingly obvious both that it's happening, and that it's not in our interest for it to happen.

All the leader has to say is that they're fighting for the people then you are allowed a free pass to kill all their "enemies". No different than what we've been doing in the Middle East for the last 2 decades.

Exactly true. And this is the reason why the God of Israel will draw Russia down with a hook in its jaw to the Holy Land (oh, wait...), to be crushed in the war of (((Gog)))-Magog, because He is a God of Vengeance.

"Vengeance is Mine, I will repay, saith the Lord."

Germany also will join in with Magog, his brother, both sons of Japheth. Gomer will come down for some Mediterranean sunshine, too. They will be utterly destroyed and this will result in the one world govt being firmly established.

I have cut and pasted a small section of the article "Proof that Adolf Hitler was a double agent." for your perusal:

NidStyles Do you wish to debate any of the following?

Hitler was the same. Hitler was actually a Jew.

1) Hitler ordered the tanks to stop for 3 days near Dunkirk when only a short distance away. This allowed the entire British army and part of the French army to escape to Britain.

2) Hitler refused to take Gibraltar and turn the Mediterranean into a "German lake". There was nothing to stop the Germans from driving through Spain (their ally) and doing the job.

3) Hitler declared war on the United States.

4) Hitler refused to allow the tens of thousands of tons of weaponized nerve gas that the Germans had produced (at Dyhernfurth an der Oder) to be used. Over 500,000 artillery shells and about 100,000 bombs filled with nerve gas were found in their storage areas (mainly at Krappitz = Krapowice) at the end of the war.

6) Hitler refused to authorise the production of jet fighters. The Heinkel He 178 had its first successful flight in 1939, but the Jews Milch/Goering/Hitler showed no interest in it. The fighter version, the Heinkel He 280, was successfully demonstrated on April 5, 1941, but the Jews Milch/Goering/Hitler refused to put it into production. Hitler wasn't interested in a plane that could travel a couple of hundred miles per hour faster than the others. Same story with the Messerschmidt jets.

7) Jewish financiers gave billions to finance Hitler's rise to power.

8) Only the Nazi's attempted to kill Hitler. The Americans, British and Soviets made no attempt to kill Hitler. It is known that the British refused to allow a number of feasible assassination plans to proceed.

9) An article from "The Jewish World" tells us that Hitler, Goering and Himmler, all have close relatives living as religious Jews in Israel today. Namely,

10) In 1932 the Jewish genealogist Karl Friedrich von Frank published Hitler's family tree. It was pointed out (June 16, 1932, in the newspaper Neue Zurcher Zeitung) that the name Salomon, which came up repeatedly in Hitler's maternal line, was unlikely to be Aryan. On July 14, 1933, the newspaper Osterreichisches Abendblatt published photographs of graves of various Hitlers from Jewish cemeteries and mentioned a cookbook written in Hebrew by Rosalie Hitler. Also, a number of Jewish families, surnamed Hitler, officially applied to have their names changed due to Hitler's (supposed) antisemitism. [Hitler's Vienna by Brigitte Hamann]

Jack: you are borderline spam with this continual AH was an agent malarky.

I have been through your links, I have read most of what Makow says on the subject. You make some valid points but if there was a "smoking gun" it would be clear and you wouldn't have to spam. Instead what you present is circumstantial evidence about events that have been "protected by lies" by liars like Churchill, Roosevelt and an entire tribe of chosenites.

No one can prove Hitler wasn't an agent, so what we have to do is try to piece the jigsaw puzzle together. Whether Hitler was or wasn't an agent does not change the bigger picture. Personally, I think the puzzle fits together more logically and with less loose ends with Hitler as a fatally flawed human who sincerely was trying to save his people. History, as in this article, would tend to bear this out.

Read “The Rothschilds” by Morton, a bio with the family cooperation. Hitler protected the Rothschild “jews” during WW2. It is fully documented that his German grandmother as a servant to a wealthy Jewish family, gave birth thanks to the family son.

German industrialist “Thyssen” wrote his own book indicating Hitler was financially sponsored by British banks and German oligarchs, including Thyssen.

Rudolph Hess 1st mate to Hitler, escaped to Britain and wrote his own book that Britain did not want the war to end.

Papa Bush (of the Bush US Prez family) was convicted of “aide to enemy” during WW2 by providing oil to the Nazis. Thus US oligarchs were aiding Hitler. Documented.

Many of these books have been taken out of circulation to hide the truth, but they can be found by those who research rather than those who just spout MSM mind control programming.

I know about Hess, that doesn't prove in any fashion that Hitler was owned by and worked for British who wanted to destroy Germany and Germans.

That various leaders supported him at various times proves nothing. Stalin was his defender in 40-41 too, does that mean that Hitler was Stalin's puppet? The grand Mufti supported him too, was Hitler a moslem?

1. Blitzkrieg was a wholly new concept. Guderian in his memoirs noted that supply for the panzers was the weak link noted since the Anschluss and Czechoslovakia. These lines were overextended. Goering assured the luftwaffe could pound the beach head into submission. Hitler having understood he made a mistake immediately ordered the drive to Dunkirk.

2. Operation Felix was the codename for a proposed German seizure of Gibraltar during World War II, subject to the co-operation of Spanish caudilloFrancisco Franco. It never went ahead, chiefly because of Franco’s reluctance to enter the war. Hitler was unaware that his own envoy, Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, head of the Abwehr (intelligence service), was running a secret resistance movement and liaising closely with Franco by specifying particular terms that Hitler was certain to refuse. This ensured that the negotiations would fail.

For Germany the mediterranean was a side show. It was Rome's sphere of influence.

3. He was very keen to get the japanise to join the effort. The japanise in a diplomatic communique inquired would Germany back them and recieved a reply they would. In fact they pounced on it. The US was providing armed escort for British shipping and considered to be in an undeclared war with Germany. Admiral Doenitz insisted on a declaration to be able to do something about this (the response - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Happy_Time). This was december 1941 with the jerries at the gates of Moscow and in an atmosphere that the campaign for Russia was as good as over.

4. The germans had the most advanced nerve agents, true. However, Hitler had been personally gassed during WW1, which could account for his reluctance to use them. Also, the allies had them as well and a free reign to bomb Germany at will. Not a smart move to start a tit-for-tat with them as this was the case.

5. They did not have the landing craft for it, no air supremacy and the royal navy ruled the waves. Besides there was a lack of interest, Barbarossa was always to be the main commitment.

6. A mistake. Having understood he made it by insisting the jets were to be used as bombers, he rectified the decision. Way too late at the war to make a difference to the outcome one way or the other.

Hitler did not order the tanks to stop at Dunkirk. Guderian gave the stop order because he feared that the German panzers would be bogged down in the terrain around Dunkirk. Lines were also overstretched, which was another matter for concern as well as the prospects of eventually tanks having to fight in the streets of Dunkirk for which tanks are not that suitable. Hitler sanctioned the stop order after Goering pleaded with Hitler that his Luftwaffe would finish the job which of course the Luftwaffe didn't. Hitler also did not refuse to conquer Britain. Britain was not completely defenseless (although Britain came very close to collapsing). The Germans could not bring Britain to its knees because the Luftwaffe lost many planes during Fall Gelb (for instance, they lost over 400, many of them troop carriers over Holland, in just 5 days). Then Goering made another disastrous move (for the Germans) by shifting the accent of the bombing raids from targeting airfields to civilian targets (after the Brits bombed Hamburg).

Why pick on Germany? The same is happening all over Europe and it is, of course, all part of the NWO plan. National identities, borders, cultures and languages are the biggest obstacle to Globalisation and the NWO. The only problem for the "elites"? We the people in increasing numbers are on to them as evidenced by the polls all over Europe electing non-establishment parties. But there is still a long way to go, as evidenced by the Skripal fiasco in the UK, but still the race is on between "them" and "us"?

To the chosenites, white christians in general are the descendents of the Romans. These people never forget their blood feuds, and this is why white Christians not only in Europe, but across the planet are under constant aggressive cultural attack. Even Iceland for christ's sake. What did they ever do to the jews? Answer: they are romans. They are Amalek.

Really? Are you referring to them allowing SA refugees, for now? That is a drop in the bucket. At the same time, how many Australian "soldiers" are stationed in far flung bases working with ZOG to enfore ZOG empire? Australian jets bombed Del Ezzor destroying a peace deal had been signed days earlier.

I respect Aussie's for at least standing up for their own people in the commonwealth, and calling bullshit to modern day retro racism against whites. South Africa being a moral disgrace to white Europeans. I hope they speak louder on this before its too late.

Also, fuck the term Rascist. Its been used up so much, I don't know how white people care anymore.

The politicians have completely misjudge the indigenous European people, the people will rise, its starting to happen with popularism. This will be hijacked by the true far right and the newcomers will be run off European soil.

@Haus-T. Yes I completely agree. As I said in my earlier post it's a race against time between "we the people" and "them". And we the people are running out of time. And the response in the UK to the Skripal fiasco doesn't inspire confidence that we the people have yet fully opened our eyes?

Policy enacted by the US government and their tribal cancer that permeates it's government. What is being done to Europe will happen to your country. Given enough time, if you think arabs won't be removed by the indolent African you are sorely mistaken. The same with the Chinese and specifically the Asiatic countries. The mixed mongrels will be used against them. If they keep them out they'll elect their crypto-agents who look and talk like you but are descendants of mixed-race mongrels and who will slowly but surely destroy your nation from within. I once had a callous conversation regarding this with a Vizhnitz Rabbi and he answered bluntly, 'wherever we go, we must destroy'.

Of course. They will be just called Germans and the current majority Germans will be called the "old Germans". The new future Germany will still be called Germany, but the remains of the current Germany will be called "the Old Germany".

Not quite. A falling population means far fewer workers and soldiers, fewer goods and services produced, and out-of-control dependency ratios as the eldering outnumber the young who have to support them.

Population collapse is the death of peoples and nations. That ought to be obvious, but apparently some folks will believe anything these days.

This. The plagues in Europe, once the bodies were cleared away, were the best thing to happen, arguably. Freed up massive amounts of wealth and land, fuelling first the Renaissance and then the Industrial Revolution.

Japan's "demographic crisis" will be a boon in a few decades so long as they don't stupidly open up to non-Japanese. Real estate will finally come down to sane levels once more and families will be able to afford their own space.

It is not the first time the Germanic lands were faced with a depopulation event. The 30 year war was quite devasting to population density.

The difference with current affairs is the influx of immigrees from non European countries.

As always, this dilutes the whole concept of a people. And it renders the dedication of the bundestag obsolete: dem Deutschen Volke. It could, for all intends and purposes, by the same token be removed.