It is just Common Sense, “Give(n) a person of ordinary intelligence,"[4] as Alexander Hamilton stated it unquestionably in June of 1788 at the ratification of the Constitution for the United States of America:“There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void… To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.”[5]

How then can a judge, a delegated authority, acting under a constitutional commission award themselves absolute immunity from said constitutional commission to “do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid?” That is to say immunity for the “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America”[6]

That is in essence what happened with Randall v. Brigham, 74 U. S. 536 (1868) and Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1871) just post Civil War 1868 & 1871.At first it was just the civil rights of newly emancipated slaves, but since, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967), it has been an all consuming ever-increasing authorization e.g., forced sterilization / genetic engineering,[7]malicious or dishonest” prosecutors,[8]“knowingly false testimony bypolice officers"[9]and FINALLY absolute immunity for all malicious, corrupt, dishonest and incompetent[10]“persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process”[11]to “do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid” to wit the “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America”[12] for EVERYBODY!!!!! Civil Rights are NOT “vexatious actions”[13] or “continual Calumniations”[14] they are what “We the People” call the judicial process’s… the Justice Department’s job!!!

I use the example of Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird” because the facts of the admittedly fictionalized case are well known though not without standing.A lot of people ask “what rights was Tom Robinson denied?”[15]Tom Robinson was denied Justice in the form of the denial of Due Process of Law. Tom Robinson was denied the good faith efforts of those constitutionally responsible for the administration of our system of JUSTICE, the sheriff, the prosecutor and the Judge.They should have all worked in UNISON to investigate the alleged attack and exposed the inconsistent racially biased allegations for the bold face FRAUD that it was “before out of court”[16] so as to avoid for “We the People” “vexatious actions”[17] or “continual Calumniations.”[18]

BEFORE Tom Robinson was even ARRESTED;

and WELL before being brought to TRIAL.

Tom Robison should never have EVEN been brought to TRIAL!!!!!!!!!!The same can be said of the admitted CORRUPT, MALICIOUS, DISHONEST and INCOMPETENT[19] ARREST and persecutions of Mr. Thompson,[20] Mr. Smith,[21]Mr. al-Kidd[22] and myself in USCA8 No. 11-2425.[23]

The sheriff, the prosecutor and the Judge have pretrial professional responsibility in ALL CASES to investigate the credibility of the allegation to avoid “vexatious actions”[24] or “continual Calumniations”[25] for “We the People.”

Judges in particular are granted broad powers to the ends of Justice to avoid vexatious actions”[26] or “continual Calumniations”[27] for “We the People.”When those broad powers are used corruptly, maliciously, dishonestly and incompetently[28] their innocent victims, Mr. Thompson,[29] Mr. Smith,[30]Mr. al-Kidd[31] and myself in USCA8 No. 11-2425.[32], should be afforded proper redress for the injury / grievance as established by the 1st Amendment,[33] Supreme Court (1803) precedent, stare decisis, and in the COMMON LAW of ENGLAND (1766), even before our Declaration of Independence, “for it is a settled and invariable principle in the laws of England that every right, when withheld, must have a remedy, and every injury its proper redress.”[34]

But “We the People” are not allowed to DEMAND a good faith effort from our judicial process.“We the People” are not allowed access to JUSTICE.“We the People” are forced in REALLIFE EVERYDAY, see Mr. Thompson (No. 09–571),[35] Mr. Smith (No. 10-8145), [36] Mr. al-Kidd (No. 10–98)[37]and myself (USCA8 No. 11-2425),[38]to accept BLINDLY without question the absolute immunity of our Judicial Process’s corruption, malice, dishonesty and incompetence[39] i.e., “the Law will not admit any proof against this vehement and violent presumption of Law, that a Justice[40] sworn to do Justice will do injustice.”

“We the People” under the corrupt, malicious, dishonest and incompetent[41] rule of the current and past Supreme Court FIVE’s[42] precedent, stare decisis, are forced EVERYDAY to accept “False and malicious persecutions”[43] “before out of court”[44] all over America by a blanket grant of absolute immunity to “malicious or corrupt” judges,[45] the “malicious or dishonest” prosecutor,[46]the “knowingly false testimony bypolice officers"[47] and all malicious, corrupt, dishonest and incompetent[48] “persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process”[49] acting under color of law.[50]

TODAY Justice cannot be established in the United States of America!!!!

“We the People’sJudiciary, have ministerially[51] awarded themselves and others absolute immunity[52] from the “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America”[53] i.e., a blanket grant of Absolute Immunity to “malicious or corrupt” judges,[54] the “malicious or dishonest” prosecutor,[55]the “knowingly false testimony bypolice officers"[56] and all malicious, corrupt, dishonest and incompetent[57] “persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process”[58] acting under color of law.

ANY assertion of personal ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY, without proof of divinity, is a fraud, by any standard of Justice, law and equity,[59] in a government of free and equal persons on THIS PLANET!!!!!

ANY assertion of governmental ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY, acknowledging un-avoidable human fallibility, is a fraud, by any standard of Justice, law and equity, in a government of the people, by the people and for the people on THIS PLANET!!!!!

The ministerial[60] grant of “Absolute Immunity,”[61] by and for ministers, is a massive, at the highest levels, ministerial, unconstitutional and “unlawful Conspiracy”[62] “before out of Court”[63] to obfuscate “false and malicious Persecutions.”[64]

“Immunity is given to crime, and the records of the public tribunals are searched in vain for any evidence of effective redress.” “The courts are in many instances under the control of those who are wholly inimical to the impartial administration of law and equity.”I say it NOW, 2011!!! Justice William O. Douglas said it in 1961 and 1967.[65]Mr. Lowe of Kansas and Mr. Rainey of South Carolina respectively said it originally in 1871[66].

In every stage of these Oppressions I have petitioned for redress[67] in the most humble terms: My repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A President, A group of Judges or Judicial Process whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.[68]

The Right of Petition is the right to substantive justice between the government and the people.We do not have any individually enforceable rights in this country, "Everybody, BUT the innocent victim, has "ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY"[73]" for the “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America”[74] e.g., “To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process,”[75] “The Exclusionary Rule,” “Grounds for Impeachment.”

Most of the 99% of Americans have not had the pleasure and are silently intimidated by the prospect of being dragged through our corrupt COURTS kicking and screaming!!!!!!I have been kicking and screaming for nearly 8 years.I have suffered through 411 days of illegal incarceration, 4 years of homelessness and two psychological examinations.I ask you to review Jeep v Obama 8th Circuit Court of Appeals case #11-2425, Jeep v United States of America 10-1947,” Jeep v Bennett 08-1823, “Jeep v Jones 07-2614, and the most humble Petition for a Wirt of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115.”

[1] “And if you think that is a national problem, consider that the United States is by far the World's greatest power; it is not accountable to its own people for its abuses of power, and that abuse of power flows freely into international circles. Given that reality, there is not a nation in the world that should not fear us in the same way that a reasonable person fears a child (or a thief) with a gun.” 31 U. WEST L.A. L. REV. ( Summer 2000 ) JOHN E. WOLFGRAM e.g., George Bush’s false representations of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq -Underlining and parenthetical text added for emphasis.

[7]IN 1978Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978) Forced Sterilization, In 1971, Judge Harold D. Stump granted a mother's petition to have a tubal ligation performed on her 15-year-old daughter, whom the mother alleged was "somewhat retarded." The petition was granted the same day that it was filed. The judge did not hold a hearing to receive evidence or appoint a lawyer to protect the daughter's interests. The daughter underwent the surgery a week later, having been told that she was to have her appendix removed.

[15] A widely searched QUESTION on the internet, I use only because everyone is familiar with the facts of the case.It could be just as well Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011, Smith v. Cain, No. 10-8145, Ashcroft v. al-Kidd No. 10–98Decided May 31, 2011, Messerschmidt v. Millender, No. 10-704 or USCA8 #07-2614, #08-1823, #10-1947 and Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court #07-11115

[16]Lord Coke, Floyd and Barker (1607)“extrajudicial; but due examination of Causes out of Court, and inquiring by Testimonies, Et similia, is not any Conspiracy, for this he ought to do”

[43]Lord CokeFloyd and Barker (1607) “Judge or Justice of Peace: and the Law will not admit any proof against this vehement and violent presumption of Law, that a Justice sworn to do Justice will do injustice; but if he hath conspired before out of Court, this is extrajudicial; but due examination of Causes out of Court, and inquiring by Testimonies, Et similia, is not any Conspiracy, for this he ought to do; but subornation of Witnesses, and false and malicious Persecutions, out of Court, to such whom he knowes will be Indictors, to find any guilty, &c. amounts to an unlawful Conspiracy.”

[51] Ministerially created rules are SECONDARY, in a Democratic Constitutional form of government, to the will of the people as specifically expressed in the Constitution and the Statute law.For anyone to ministerially grant immunity from the Constitution and Statute law is to act in direct conflict with the tenor of the commission under which the MINISTERIAL authority was granted.

[59] Justice without regard to equity impoverishes the victim at the expense of the wrong they have suffered e.g., I have been forced into homelessness for FOUR YEARS!The 7th Amendment’s reference “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law” assures an justice as regards equity.

[70] The redress of a justifiable grievance REQUIRES a remedy in BOTH law and equity

[71] Article III Section 1 the Constitution for the United States of America "The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour" Yes it is spelled wrong in the Constitution

[72] Amendment VII In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

[75] Mr. Hoar of Massachusetts stated: "Now, it is an effectual denial by a State of the equal protection of the laws when any class of officers charged under the laws with their administration permanently, and as a rule, refuse to extend that protection. If every sheriff in South Carolina (or now the State of Missouri) refuses to serve a writ for a colored man, and those sheriffs are kept in office year after year by the people of South Carolina (or now the State of Missouri), and no verdict against them for their failure of duty can be obtained before a South Carolina (or now the State of Missouri) jury, the State of South Carolina (or now the State of Missouri), through the class of officers who are its representatives to afford the equal protection of the laws to that class of citizens, has denied that protection. If the jurors of South Carolina (or now the State of Missouri) constantly and as a rule refuse to do justice between man and man where the rights of a particular class of its citizens are concerned, and that State affords by its legislation no remedy, that is as much a denial to that class of citizens of the equal protection of the laws as if the State itself put on its statute book a statute enacting that no verdict should be rendered in the courts of that State in favor of this class of citizens. " Cong.Globe, 42d Cong., 1st Sess. p. 334.( Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961), Page 365 U. S. 177) Senator Pratt of Indiana spoke of the discrimination against Union sympathizers and Negroes in the actual enforcement of the laws: "Plausibly and sophistically, it is said the laws of North Carolina (or now the State of Missouri) do not discriminate against them; that the provisions in favor of rights and liberties are general; that the courts are open to all; that juries, grand and petit, are commanded to hear and redress without distinction as to color, race, or political sentiment." "But it is a fact, asserted in the report, that of the hundreds of outrages committed upon loyal people through the agency of this Ku Klux organization, not one has been punished. This defect in the administration of the laws does not extend to other cases. Vigorously enough are the laws enforced against Union people. They only fail in efficiency when a man of known Union sentiments, white or black, invokes their aid. Then Justice closes the door of her temples."Cong.Globe, 42d Cong., 1st Sess. p. 505. (Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961), Page 365 U. S. 178) non italic parenthetical text added fro clarity.

GoFundMe

Contact Form

About Me

“Where
an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is
safe in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions.

Where
there is an excess of liberty, the effect is the same, tho’ from an opposite
cause.

Government
is instituted to protect property of every sort, as well that which lies in the
various rights of individuals as that which the term particularly expresses.
This being the end of government, that alone is a just government which
impartially secures to every man whatever is his own.” James
Madison “Essays for the National Gazette 1791- 1792”

The
strength of human civilization is its ability to OVERCOME our purely animal
instincts… CO-OPERATE for the GREATER GOOD!!Human civilization is the only species on this planet capable of
overcoming the animal instinct of Herbert Spencer’s discredited “survival of
the fittest.”This ability is what makes
us human, what makes us dominant and what separates us from the animals.

The
United States of America was FOUNDED on the "Love of Virtue."The Founding Fathers based their
constitutional assertions on the love of virtue as defined by Montesquieu’s
republican government’s essential ingredient, the willingness to put the
interests of the community ahead of private interests.We need to remember the, at the time,
“REVOLUTIONARY” “Love of Virtue” that this country was founded upon….