Pakistan Stoked Fire Burns Kashmir

Wednesday, 06 October 2010 04:01
Brigadier Chitranjan Sawant

Ms Benazir Bhutto, the slain Prime Minister of Pakistan, had written in her revised autobiographical book, Daughter of the East, that many a time the Pakistan Army generals, including Pervez Musharraf, later President of Pakistan, and Mirza Aslam Beg, former Pakistan army chief and both Mohajirs or refugees of Indian origin, had presented her a plan to wrest Srinagar, capital of Kashmir, from India in no time if she approved of the military invasion. "What next?" that was her query. The generals assured her of a place in history of winning Kashmir and merging it with Pakistan. The generals pulled the Islamic card out and invited Ms Benazir Bhutto to celebrate merger of Kashmir with Pakistan by offering namaz in the jama masjid of Srinagar. Little did they realise that Benazir, being a woman, was not permitted to enter the portals of a mosque, what to say of offering prayers. The generals were busy building castles in the air as no ground was available to them in the state of Jammu and Kashmir.

Ms Bhutto said that nothing of this sort would happen as the UN Security Council would order a pull back and Pakistan would be humiliated.

The moral of the story is that the Pakistan army has been stoking fire of hatred and sedition that is burning the Kashmir valley. Of course, the discourses in mosques and teachings in madarsas also incite the common Muslim in the Kashmir valley to secede from India and join Pakistan or become independent. Independence of Kashmir is a far cry and no one, not even diehard separatists believe in its realisation. Their goal is to merge with Pakistan. Little do they realise that it was hordes of Pakistani marauders who had looted them, raped their women and burnt their artefacts in the name of Islam. An average Kashmiri is suffering from amnesia today.

Historical Himalayan Blunders

Jawaharlal Nehru is the original sinner. He wished to handle Kashmir problem himself being a Kashmiri pundit. He sidelined Sardar Patel who was the home minister and had successfully amalgamated Junagarh and later Hyderabad. Nehru had felt slighted as Muslim states had merged with India. His frail secularism felt a body blow. In return Nehru gave a body blow to India by messing up the Kashmir problem by taking it to the United Nations where the original complaint of his is still lingering. Nehru was a dreamer and was rarely in touch with the ground realities. In his misplaced enthusiasm he, under the faulty advice of Lord Mountbatten, agreed to hold a plebiscite in J&K before the merger of the State with India. The law did not require it as the Maharajah, Sir Hari Singh was competent to merge his State with India. The British were not happy about this solution and had the issue entangled in international forum. In any case, Gilgit, Chitral and the Northern Area had been offered to Pakistan by the British officers of the Maharajah’s army by inciting a revolt among the Muslim troops of the state forces and imprisoning the Hindu Dogra governor of the region. Nehru, as prime minister of India had nit even whimpered about the British complicity in ceding the Maharajah’s territory to Pakistan.

Nehru’s yes to the wily proposal of the Plebiscite was the stick with which Sheikh Abdullah would beat Nehru into submission to his sinister plans. He would frighten Nehru with the possibility of Kashmiri Muslims voting against India if the Maharajah, His Highness Sir Hari Singh was not banished from his own state that he had merged with India. On the other hand, the Nizam of Hyderabad who had waged war against India and lost, was made the Rajpramukh of his territory. He was given no punishment for his anti-Hindu and anti-India policies and pronouncements. Why? It did not suit Nehru’s secularism to punish a Muslim for his wrong doings. The Maharajah was punished under the coercion of Sheikh Abdullah to which weak-kneed Nehru succumbed time and again.

Thanks to the Indian stalwarts like Yuraj Karan Singh, Rafi Ahmed Kidwai that Sheikh Abdullah was sacked and imprisoned in 1953 and Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad was made the Prime Minister of J&K. It was Shri Bakshi who abolished the separatist policies of the wily Sheikh and brought J&K under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, the Election Commission and above all abolished a separate flag for the state. The Indian Parliament was made supreme for making laws for J&K too.He himself redesignated his post as Chief Minister and abolished the nomenclature, Prime Minister that was created by the Sheikh who dreamed to be a Sultan. Alas! The dream ship floundered on the rocks of patriotism of Indians who proved that they were true to their oath and fulfilled their pledge.

What a shame that Nehru rewarded Bakshi’s patriotism for India by having him removed from office under the fake Kamraj plan and signed an agreement with the same Sheikh who had dreamed of becoming the Sultan of Kashmir. Nehru never gave any weightage to the Jammu region or the Ladakh region as the former was Hindu dominated and the latter was Buddhist dominated. Muslims mattered alone to Nehru as they had supported him against Sardar Patel when the two were at loggerheads.

It has all along been the policy of Muslim mobs of the valley to take instructions from Pakistan and browbeat the Indian leadership with arson, violence and observing 14th August as the Independence Day with Pakistan. They invariably burnt the Indian tricolour on 15 August and hoisted black flag instead. Chief Ministers of J&K like Farouk Abdullah watched the desecration of the Indian national flag and took no action against the miscreants.

Indian Armed Forces

Three cheers to the Indian Armed Forces and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, Air Chief Marshal PV Naik, that they put their foot down on the fallacious demand of the Kashmiri Muslims to either remove the Armed Forces Special Powers Act or dilute it to the extent of making it and the armed forces a toothless tiger. The Pakistan backed plan is to lower the morale of the officers and jawans of the Indian security forces deployed in the insurgency affected areas, gradually withdraw them to the Indian side of the Madhopur bridge and open the door for the Pakistan army to walk into the valley. It is uprrising why the leaders of the National Conference and the PDP are a party to this sinister design. The present mobocracy is a part of the big Pakistan take over game plan. Pakistan wants to make a back door entry as it failed in wars against India time and again.

It is now for the Indian leadership in New Delhi to stand firm, stand united and support their armed forces. If they let down their own jawans by succumbing to pro-Pakistan pressure, they would be displaying their Achilles heel and inviting enemy to take a pot shot. Any display of misplaced sympathy for the criminal crowds and their delinquent leadership would amount to committing Harakiri. I hope old Chidambaram and his mentor Sonia Gandhi are listening and would stand firm against the enemy onslaught.

The battle has begun. If the young chief minister of J&K wishes to re-establish the authority of his govt, he should spend more time in the state instead of driving Audi cars in New Delhi. The idea of bringing in Rahul Gandhi to solve the present problems in Kashmir is preposterous. It is not a photo-opportunity where his smile is needed. It is a grave problem that has resulted from misgoverning the state both at the Srinagar level and New Delhi level. Let hard boiled politicians and seasoned armed forces officers handle and solve in the national interest without playing the vote-bank politics. No foul play please where national honour is involved. Let us fight with determination and defeat all anti-national elements. “Yudhai krit Nishchayah” so said Yogeshwar Shri Krishna motivating Arjuna to wage war that is Dharm Yudh. It is time all Indians, irrespective of caste, creed, region or religion stood united to beat the diabolic designs of Pakistan-inspired separatist-traitors.

AIM Listed by NLA

Australian Islamist Monitor's web publications were selected for preservation by the National Library of Australia. Access to our materials stored in the NLA Archive is facilitated in two ways: via the Library’s online catalogue; and via subject and title lists maintained on the PANDORA home page. Click HERE for direct access to the archive

Islam Kills

History - Articles

Australians celebrate and revere Anzac Day on April 25th each year in remembrance of our brave soldiers who fought in two great world wars to secure our freedom. Every Australian identifies with the slogan “lest we forget” and in services held around the country people reflect on the battles and men who died to secure our freedom. Yet across the world in France, there is one remarkable battle which helped form the Europe we know today and allowed the development of civilization based on Judeo Christian principles. This one famous battle has become known as the battle of Tours and effectively stopped the Muslim advance into Europe. After the death of Mohammed in 632AD, Muslim armies exploded out of the Arabian peninsula to conquer much of the Middle East, expanding across north Africa. From there they crossed into Spain in 711AD and eventually controlled much of al-Andalus by 715AD. It was the victory at Tours by Charles Martel that stemmed the tide and eventually the Muslim marauders were expelled from Spain in 1492 when the last outpost at Granada fell to King Ferdinand of Spain.

Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj was born, lived, fought and won battles against religious and social oppression in the 17th century Bharat or India. He was a shining star in the Indian firmament and is renowned as a champion of the downtrodden and depressed masses. He was and continues to be an icon for the classes and masses alike and is seen as a rallying point for peasants oppressed by foreign rulers, Pathans and Moghuls alike. Sexually exploited women found in Shivaji Raje a protector, a benefactor and flocked to his Hindavi Swaraj to find solace and feel liberated under his saffron flag.

Perhaps some readers might be interested to know that January 28 is considered a feast day among Catholics – actually 2 feast days are celebrated on the same day – one is of ST Thomas Aquinas, the great medieval theologian and philosopher who adapted Aristotle to the western Judeo-Christian worldview. . It is also the feast day of a lesser known person – St Peter Nolasco, the great ransomer of captives from the Muslims.

The dramatic rescue of the American cargo-ship captain Richard Phillips from the hands of Somalian Islamic pirates by the U.S. Navy—killing three pirates, holding him hostage at gun-point, through precision-targeting—warrants a review of the U.S. struggle with piracy and hostage-taking in North Africa, which ended two centuries ago.

Raiding trade-caravans and hostage-taking for extracting ransom in Islam was started by Prophet Muhammad. Having become powerful and secure after his relocation to Medina from Mecca in 622, Muhammad initiated Jihad or holy war in the form of raids of trade-caravans for earning livelihood for his community. In the first successful raid of a Meccan caravan at Nakhla in December 623, his brigands killed one of the attendants, took two of them captive, and acquired the caravan as “sacred” booty. The captives were ransomed to generate further revenue. Muhammad, later on, expanded this mode of Jihad to raiding non-Muslim communities around Arabia—for capturing their homes, properties and livestock, capturing their women and children as slaves often for ransoming and selling, and imposing extortional taxes—which sometimes involved mass-slaughter of the attacked victims.

On January 1, 1915 two Broken Hill men, both former camel drivers, armed themselves with rifles, an homemade flag bearing Islamic insignia and a large supply of ammunition and launched a surprise attack on the Picnic Train about 3 kilometres outside Broken Hill.

The train carried about 1200 Broken Hill residents to Silverton where a picnic to celebrate the new year was to take place.

The two Muslim men, Gool Mohamed originally a Pashtun tribesman from Afghanistan and Mullah Abdullah from what is known today as Pakistan, decided to wage jihad against Australian infidels after Australia and the Ottoman Empire officially joined the opposite sides in the WWI.

How often in conversation with a Muslim, do they quote Spain as the crowning achievement of Islam, where Muslims, Jews and Christians lived in harmony for about 800 years?

And when you mention the killings and massacres, you are told that the Spanish Inquisition was much worse.
This is a misconception, since the Inquisition in Spain was responsible for only between 4,000 and 5,000 lives. [1]

Yet in 1066AD, in a single day, muslims murdered over 4,000 Jews because Vizier Joseph ibn Naghrela had risen to a position greater than them, and of course, this upset the Muslim sensitivities. [2]

Why are you a Muslim?
Musli ms in general love to hear the above question because it has a simple and readymade answer in their minds besides it gives them the opp or t u nity to propagate their religion and talk proudly about Islam.

At this time of year, it is timely to remember one of the greatest victories of the west against the Islamic world. On the 7th October in 1571, Don Juan and the Holy League, led by Admiral Doria, defeated the larger Ottoman fleet in the Battle of Lepanto, saving Europe from the Turks and militant Islam. The Holy League was a coalition of different armies - of the Republic of Venice, the Papacy (under Pope Pius V), Spain (including Naples, Sicily and Sardinia), the Republic of Genoa, the Duchy of Savoy, the Knights Hospitaller and some others.

When Mohamed and his faithful followers moved from Mecca to Medina, they found themselves among three Jewish tribes/clans (BANU-L-NADIR, BANU KAINUKA and BANU KURAIZA) which settled there some time after their expulsion from their homeland and also living there were two Arab, pagan tribes.

Mohammed, who at this stage needed more followers, decided to win those tribes over and convert them to his newly invented religion.

Islam was yet not as fully developed as we know it today, and Mohammed was still having his sessions with Allah (the Medina period revelations).

Did Prophet Muhammad order Killing Surrendered Jews of Banu Quraiza and Khaybar? A historical Analysis!

In the post 9/11 era of this modern-world, Islamists around the globe are busy with ‘damage control utopia’ in order to correct the image of religion Islam. We all know that the nucleus of Islam are: Quran, Hadiths (Sunnah) supported by Islamic histories and biographies recorded by various famous Islamic scholars and historians.

A great tragedy of the Islamic control of our universities and political correctness plus the fear of extreme violence if anyone dares question the roots and claims of Islam is ...that nobody dares question the roots and claims of Islam!!! I want to stimulate interest and offer this summary of information on Mecca from (LINK) which discusses some problems with Muslim claims in a comparison of evidence supporting Islam/Christianity.

There is a very strongly entrenched view among majority of Westerners today that the three main monotheistic religions Judaism, Christianity and Islam share one common God and therefore despite the obvious differences, the core foundation of these three religions is the same.