Constantine killed Jews who circumcised their slaves, and freed the slavesAnonymous09/04/18 (Tue) 02:09:1945dd08No.12102373

Constantine the GAReat

21 October 335

>If a Jew has bought and circumcised a Christian slave or one belonging to any other religious community, he may under no circumstances keep the circumcised person in slavery; rather, whoever suffers such a thing shall obtain the privilege of freedom.

9 March 336

>Some time ago a most salutary sanction of our constitution was promulgated, which we now make doubly noteworthy by the repetition of our law. If any Jew has acquired a Christian slave or one belonging to some other religious community, and has not shrunk from circumcising him, let the circumcised person, according to this decree, attain his freedom and enjoy its privileges. It is not right that a Jew who has circumcised a slave of this kind should keep him in slavery

13 August 339

>If any Jew should suppose that he should purchase the slave of another sec or people, such slave shall be immediately vindicated to the fisc. If the Jew should purchase a slave and circumcise him, he shall be penalized not only with the loss of the slave, but he shall also be visited with capital punishment.

>https://books.google.ca/books?id=tdKCAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA185 (History of the Jews in the Greco-Roman World, 2003, Peter Shafer)

This guy was amazing, and raising awareness of him will support a trifecta of also raising awareness that:

>Jews kept slaves in the modern era

>Jews gave forced circumcisions to the non-consenting

>Christians didn't just protect other Christians from Jewish slavery/mutilation, but members of ANY religious community.

I'm not a theist or anything but despite that I can really fucking appreciate this guy and the Christian spirit. He's inspirational. He should get a national holiday. Are there any downsides I'm overlooking to celebrating him?

Perhaps the majority, but I wouldn't say that applies to all moderns. Man, I bet the Jews engineered the fall of the Roman empire because they were pissed about not getting to slice up their slave dicks and drink the blood anymore.

Mormonism isn't Judaism lite, it's more like the coopted nepotism from the Jews and created their own rival sect. Nothing wrong with taking the Jews tricks and using it yourself, in fact we should be doing that more often.

Do not forget how Emperor Constantine suppressed anything that challenged Christian Orthodoxy (Not the current Orthodox Church - Biblical Scripture in general) including non-Christian places of worship, as well as the works of heathen writers, and even those of other Christian denominations (Sectarian disputes are integral to Abrahamism). Not to mention how he authorized the destruction of 'pagan' temples - their vandalism and desecration by building Churches grew widespread.

In their baptismal fonts they have 12 golden bulls symbolizing the twelve tribes of pissrael and their garb and religious rituals inside the temple is 100% Masonic and 100% semitic. Moloch worship. Ritual canibalism. Kike worship.

I assumed there’d be a Constantine mini-series like Rome and Spartacus considering he killed his wife and his son plus they could take shots at Christianity as usual along with a bunch of gratuitous sex and violence

The Jews probably influenced his son's successor Julian The Apostate, who tried to rebuild the Temple for the Jews, he probably only did that because the Jews had turned the Empire into a bablyon hell hole and he thought putting them back in their place would make things OK, but with Jews you lose, anyway he couldn't get the Temple rebuilt anyway.

No. (((They're))) not. Honorable men like Seneca the Younger and Cicero are the anti-Semites that the Jews still hold grudges against - not someone who kickstarted the destruction of pre-Christian Rome.

Have you read the Book of Mormon?? It's Judaism 2.0! Its about a lost tribe of Israel going to the Americas via underwater wooden subs, across the pacific. Where they wrote their story on gold colored tablets where Joseph Smith found them and translated them using a rock in a hat….

It's a false religion, Joseph Smith was a con artist that had to skip states to keep from being jailed.

“Kickstarted” He saved the establishment of the decaying corrupt empire by moving it to Byzantium closer to the wealthier provinces and more defensible then Rome . Constantinople would last another 1200 years

He burnt a dying corpse of an empire that followed its native faiths, and built an empire of Abrahamism out of its bones and on its ashes - and needlessly hurt and killed loyal followers of native faiths in the process.

He reunited a empire that’s been racked with constant civil war , brought a common faith that would unite all of Europe (albeit periodically) and built a nation that not only withstood the endless onslaught of barbarians but was the only beacon of light during the Dark Ages

But he wasn't the first Roman emperor to take the jews to task for their relentless fixation on mutilating dicks. A surviving edict from the emperor Hadrian documents him taking legal action against all such cutting kikery, with the exception being for themselves. In other words, Hadrian's law said if the jews want to slice and dice the dickheads of their own sons, that's OK… But the jews have to leave everybody else - their slaves included - the fuck alone.

LOL, this thread is so lowkey christcuck. Christianity is shit. Romans were persecuting jews long before Christianity, and judaism was corrupting Rome long before Rome was Christian. the only constant is that jews always try to subvert Europeans, be they christcucks, atheists, or even pagans. Jews just fucking hate Europeans. That's all there is to it.

The interesting thing about the date of the edits is even though he would auto-free slaves who were circumcised in 335, this was so fucking ineffective that he had to up the punishment to execution of slave-circumcisers in 339.

4 years of depriving Jews of their property wasn't enough to stop them. Jews were willing to lose the cost of a slave if it meant forcibly circumcising them. Jews were basically using their wealth to try and force non-Jews into Jewish society. Once mutilated, they were so traumatized and outcast that they figured they had nowhere else to turn and were subjugated by their Jewish abusers even after being freed.

Jews has the perspective "I'm still expanding the Jewish ranks, and I can always buy new slaves" so Constantine's death penalty was the perfect counter, because even if they managed to turn their slave to Judaism through this sexual assault, it would not increase the amount of Jews so long as the mutilator was tried in court after the 1st victim but before they could abuse a 2nd.

Of course, the problem there is, you'd probably have Jews buying dozens of slave and mass-circumcising them simultaneously. This is why Constantine also made it illegal for Jews to purchase non-Jewish slaves. They could be immediately rescued by the government.

WHOOPS

I dun goofed guys, Constantine died in 337, it was one of his three sons (Constantius II) who made the change in 339 to further increased inhibition of Jewish slave-abuse by preventing them from owning non-Christian slaves and executing those who circumcised them.

He was born 3 August 317 so when his dad died in 22 May 337 he was only 19 years old. Considering he passed this law on 13 August 339, it took him under 3 months to accomplish it.

This is pretty impressive considering he was probably grieving, and it was complicated sharing powers with his older bro Constantine II and younger bro Constans.

Fair point, that's the sort of fair perspective I've posted this to inquire about. That said, do you have any non-Jewish sources for these claims? It occurs to me that with Jewish involvement in our Academia that his antagonizing the Jews could've led to him being falsely blamed for things he didn't have a hand in, similar to Hitler.

For example: what if some of the destruction of pagan temples was done by Jews and then blamed on the Roman government? Just a thought.

The wiping out of Greco-Roman religion bothers me just like the wiping out of the Norse religion, I love the sex and violence and polytheistic anthropomorphisms in those things. So to whatever degree Constantine was involved in it, being aware will temper my admiration for his persecution of Jewish slave-mutilators and humanize him as a flawed human being.

I think the mistake that Constantine made, and one later repeated by the Spanish, is the acceptance of Jews who allegedly converted to Christianity. This led Rome and Spain to be infested with Crypto-Jews, instead of fully expelling them.

>Not to mention how he authorized the destruction of 'pagan' temples - their vandalism and desecration by building Churches grew widespread.

Already answered and most destruction came from temples under Kitos war and i am not talking about human sacrifices, seriously, if your brother was tortured or killed there you wouldnt give a fuck about that place being an archaeological site in the future.

Let's not forget all the early Christian sects that were denounced as heresy and subsequently persecuted. Gnosticism, Arianism, Docetism, etc. were all subject to sectarian violence which is a hallmark of Abrahamic faiths. Divide up the believers and get them to murder eachother over interpretations and baseless accusations - that is the way of the worship of (((YHWH))).

I'm not talking about the destruction of Jewish temples, those don't even count as 'pagan' anyway since they were devoted to (((YHWH))). I'm specifically talking about the destruction of pre-Christian Hellenistic temples.

It seems like Jewish objectors about Jesus being messiah according to THEIR doctrine may be right. So if he was not the Jewish messiah, what is the real religion he was the messiah for? Was he a better 3-D chess player than Trump and and co-optied their religion, dividing their followers and and supplementing them with non-Jews to disrupt Jewish dominance?

Much like Trump paying tribute to the wall, letting Jews in his administration, pretending friendship with Israel by moving embassy, while Jesus did not sway ALL the Jews, it seems like he did recruit a large number of them to follow him, and did an impressive amount of damage to the pseudoIsraeli PHARISEE sons of Judea.

The actual Jewish Messiah is supposed to be a son from the paternal line of David. Jesus' stepdad Joseph (the husband of Virgin Mary) supposedly fit that bill, but whoever Jesus dad was (Zeus? Odin? Hercules? Thor? Marduk? Gilgamesh? The Doctor? Tesla?) c-c-c-combo broke that by cucking Joseph: he deflowered his virgin bride and then had Joseph feed and clothe him. By the time Joseph actually had a son with Mary (Jesus' half-brother James) Jesus' real dad had already infected Mary with his DNA so that subsequent children would be genetic chimeras of Jesus' dad and later sperm contributors.

I am interested in the possibility of exploring non-Abrahamic Christianity, the worship of Jesus but as a non-Jewish messiah who simply played amazing mind games and memetically disrupted the Jewish religion and stole their shit. Does this offend/interest anyone? What problems would this pose in re-interpreting Christian faith?

No not really, I don't think that's what Greco-Roman or Norse religion was all about, just regurgitating Abrahamic-prejudiced stereotypes so as to not alienate the christfags with my fanboy fascinations. I actually know very little about them outside their stats in Pantheons of the Megaverse.

But since we are now talking about Constantius II and not Constantine I, could you tell me the worst he did in relation to the pagans?

Islam wouldn't exist without Christian scripture. Not only that, but Christian Byzantium and its wars with Zoroastrian Persia weakened both to the point where they were both vulnerable to Islamic conquest.

>If you're trying to say that Jesus followed a religion, the pharisee is pouring out of you like saliva out of a retard. Jesus is the Christ. He IS the religion

What you guys are saying is basically what I'm trying to say. I don't think he was following the Jews/Pharisees, but that he was crafty in how he rejected them so as to convert their followers who were hoping for a Jewish Messiah without them actually wising up that they were following a different religion's messiah.

You sure the Talmud didn't say SIX billion? Jews are prone to exaggerating the numbers of their dead by several decimal points. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bar_Kokhba_revolt only says 580,000 dead Jews and is the only Jewish-Roman war to have occurred during his reign, so where would the additional 4,999,420,000 come from?

Of course, islam was a weapon created by them to fight christianity, all "gospels" supporting islamic views can be dated between the Kitos war and talmud creation, of course you dont have memes about that, christianity is strong enough to endure barbarii and teach them to behave like decent human beings.

He was framed by the merchants, stood before pontious pilate and was crucified. The merchants told the romans that jesus was informing them not to pay their taxes, when he stood trial he stated, "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesars and God that which is God's" meaning, the merchants lied about him telling the Judeans not the pay the Roman Empire.

750db2 are you referring to something like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitos_War#Cyrenaica ?

>In Cyrenaica, the rebels were led by one Lukuas or Andreas, who called himself "king" (according to Eusebius of Caesarea). His group destroyed many temples, including those to Hecate, Jupiter, Apollo, Artemis, and Isis

Did the Jews take over these locations? Were so many polytheist temples destroyed that 'pagan temple' could've been code-speak for "Jewish temple" ?

>Debunked meme posted again, nice try schlomo.

I came up with the proposal on my own, but I don't expect I'd be the first, so could you please link me to the debunk so I can get more educated about Jesus? I'm not sure which aspect of my post you're referring to. I'm not really trying anything except ideas on how to decouple the merits of Jesus from the Jewish ties thrust upon us.

>Its curious how Jesus received all roman attacks without retaliation, but he expelled merchants from the Temple.

We know Zeus went around deflowering virgins all the time so imagining Jesus = Jupiterson Heraklesbro GMH

pretty sure when the poster you're replying to wrote "received all Roman attacks without retaliation" he is referring to Jesus not retaliating against the Romans, not that them crucifying was not retaliation against what Jesus did (although I doubt it was, wasn't this basically Jewish influence on the Roman government which did it?) ie whay you mention about the merchants. This was the Jews retaliating against Jesus, not the Romans retaliating against them.

Jesus didn't retaliate against Romans probably because they treated him decently except for the end, and even then he probably saw the Jewish hand at play there.

So you're saying that Constantine didn't ban the jewish religion outright like he did with every other belief system in the Roman Empire? Wouldn't he have known the jews killed Christ? Were the jews such a useful group of people that they couldn't have been banned from the empire or forced to convert? Why did (((they))) get a special place in his empire?

"Under Constantine the Great Jewish clergy were given the same exemptions as Christian clergy."

Cucked from the start. The only enemy of jews are those in favor of their physical destruction such as Antiochus IV. But just like Constantine he cucked out, thinking there were "good jews" and paid it with his empire.

>>"But the all-seeing Lord, the God of Israel, struck him with an incurable and invisible blow. As soon as he stopped speaking he was seized with a pain in his bowels, for which there was no relief, and with sharp internal tortures" -2 Maccabees

> so could you please link me to the debunk so I can get more educated about Jesus?

Sometimes you sound like a meme supporter of a roman emperor creating all of this, but islam was that creation, just check dates of books, maybe i am wrong because ids arent that accurate.

>750db2 are you referring to something like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitos_War#Cyrenaica ?

Yes and no, like the holofun is overrated i have no reason to think that the massacre there wasnt underrated, remember that islam is related to talmud if we check dates and christians have a custom of not destroying, but recycling temples, also check how every source of data is being destroyed, from "terrorists" destroying statues to huehue monkeys fires and Sweden Yes! melting proofs.

This isn't hard to excuse, in fact, it makes Jesus look even worse, the money lenders are a bunch of old ass jews with no weapons, while the romans wear iron sword and shield, of course pussy Jesus just gives up.

Yeah, that's exactly what I meant. Instead of being like evangelical Christians and saying "the Jews are the chosen ones, were just the goyim and we need to give our live to serve the Jews" Mormons just say "nope, we're the real Jews." And reap all the benefits of treating themself as such. They don't cuck out and say they're not God's chosen people.

At a certain point Rome really wasnt even Rome anymore and if you were the emperor its because the place was so fucked up youre the jackass who got the job, and you likely only fucked it up worse. Constantine was clearly one of those asshole emperors in a declining time who converted the whole empire to Christianity trying to hold it together, due to its failings, not because it was a good religion. Im not anti-Christian in general but Constantine a shit.

No, he just banned the practice of 'paganism' (This is a slur word and you ought to know that by now. It has the same meaning to Christians as the word 'goyim' does to Jews - and both are cancerous Abrahamic concepts)

Interesting thread once again made shitty by fairy fucking, uneducated pagans/ cosplayers, (I mean fucking come on >>12102487 it's this kind of shit that get your friends/ family to laugh at you)… Congratulations mates your rocket science on the subject is about up to slate.com "157 things you didn't know about…" Your rabbi must be proud

It's a shame. I think the board as a whole was getting wise to it a few months back and they then stage an invasion by "/christian/" that got everyone even more confused. The saddest thing is the complaints in this thread aren't even real nor do they apply to Constantine. He was very tolerant of pagans and actually knew relatively little about Christianity, although judging from his letters his faith was real and wanted to learn more. It also backs up the image of jews that we know to be true today, and shows that it has been a thing for a long time - Biblical scripture shows the same thing, but when we have extra sources its even better.

If you look into the actual ancestry of Jesus and the related prophecies its pretty incredible. If I remember correctly Jesus has to be of the blood of David, and from the family of Solomon; and he is related by blood to David through Mary whose line goes through Nathan, whilst he is related by family to Solomon through Joseph; and the thing is that it the royal bloodline of Solomon is corrupted due to Jehoiachim who God cursed with 'none of your blood shall ever be King'; making it nearly impossible for the Messiah to be born unless he came through one of David's other sons, but he simultaneously has to be of Solomon's 'family'. The genealogy stuff is actually a ton more confusing and, in my opinion, seriously convincing argument for Jesus when you look into it. If Joseph were his blood parent he would actually be unable to the Messiah due to Jehoiachim's curse, and yet if he was not his adopted son he could not be of the family of Solomon.

Jews started the war between the Sassanid and Roman Empire. They reached out to the Sassanids and asked them to take Jerusalem, they opened the gates when the army arrived and to the Sassanids shock and horror; paid obscene amounts so that they (the jews) could personally torture and execute the Christians from Jerusalem. They enslaved the rest and took lots of loot, as well as the true cross of Christ (which was the symbol of Rome) back to Ctesiphon. Losing the symbol of Rome at the time unsurprisingly forced Heraclius to start a war to reclaim it or else essentially accept the fact that his Empire was defeated. After the two sides had largely annihilated each other with the Romans eventually winning, Mohamed came out of his desert with his horde and found both Empires bankrupt and with much of their armies dead; so when you see those 'impressive' early victories of the muslims, remember it is because they were fighting largely untrained young boys and elderly men, many of whom were not well armed (afterall it was incredibly difficult and expensive for Heraclius to arm his forces for the war against the Sassanids and they had to melt down a lot of artifacts and relics just to afford it). So yeah, the jews started the war between the East and West that allowed for the muds to gain a foothold in the world; and that's not even talking about how they then helped the muds in myriad ways.

What you are disingenuously referring to is the Germanic desire for purity in all things. It doesn't matter if its Christianity, Fascism, National Socialism, Democracy, Communism, or ANYTHING - Germanics pursue purity in all things. They detest corruption and hypocrites more than anything. Unsurprisingly in Germanic nations this meant that Christianity became Protestantism, which in turn for many became even more 'pure' and formed the Puritans and myriad other Puritanical sects like the Amish, Mennonites or Anabaptists. Look at how the Leftists eat one-another over perceived hypocrisy. Look at how people here, and in the mainstream media criticise politicians or historical figures. Look at how we talk about National Socialism and Fascism.

It doesn't matter what it is, Germanics will endeavour to find its most pure form. They will oppose anything they consider to be corrupting, and any individual they believe to be a hypocrite. It is a defining feature of our people.

Abraham -> Issac -> Jacobwhose name is changed to Israel -> twelve sons one of whom is Judah

Jews are Israelites, but not all Israelites are jews. BUT this also means they ARE NOT the chosen people because the Abrahamic blessing was passed onto Joseph, Judah's brother. Now modern day jews are related the the Khazars and Ottoman Turks, and they may call their state "Israel", but this is part of their con.

They do have a claim to a "piece" of Palestine, but it'd only be 1/12th, not the whole area, mainly the kingdom of Judea, which would be a middle portion just below Jerusalem.

All of Israel is disinherited in 2 Kings. Malachi (the last book of the Old Testament) gives those dwelling in Judea a final chance to repent. Mark 12 is Jesus pronouncing judgement upon Judea in a parable where He says that they are disinherited and replaced with a new people because they rejected Him.

None of Israel's descendants matter anymore. They are all disinherited and only those who followed Christ are saved. The geographical once-home of those people, even if it does belong to their blood ancestors (which as you point out with the Khazar and Ottoman stuff is unlikely), also does not belong to them anymore by their own Holy Book and God's decree - so they are not even entitled to that 1/12th.

Romans aren't known for their hatred, but their law. Kikes are the angry ones, with numerous failed uprisings and a spiritual binding.

>What does Christianity have to do with it?

He made Christianity legal and he was a Christian himself, applied the Christian ban on circumcision on the slaves of jews. This meant that jews could cut and harm themselves all they pleased, but it wasn't profitable for them to harm others. Imagine the terror those poor jews went through.

I dislike hijabs and burkas as they aren't from our culture but women should be dressing more modestly instead of like a bunch of sluts. There's plenty of more modest western clothing designs than is the popular fashion now.

When you say "Constantine the GAReat" is that some sort of typo or are you making a reference to the Roman condiment known as "garum?" (Garum was a sort of fermented fish paste that was popular in Roman society)

Regardless, all abrahamic religions are poison.

They are all the rotten fruit of the poison tree that is "judaism" or "jewish history" or "jewish people" or "jewish culture" or however you want to put it.

Christianity has some good points, but it is a slave religion that promotes obedience and "civic nationalism."

Towards the end, Rome was a CivNat shithole held together by slaves and foreign mercenaries.

It was not worth saving. The Byzantines managed to hold on for another thousand years by leaning on the powerful and extensive Greek people in the Eastern Mediterranean. Of course, the same bullshit carried on and the Greeks were gradually ground away.

The Romans fell into the "CivNat" trap and allowed their ACTUAL DEMOGRAPHIC PEOPLE to dwindle and be bred out of existence.

Thus they fell to ruin since CivNat is retarded shit and a "diverse" country has nothing "real" to hold it together.

Sharia is not much different from various western policies that served the same role, the kneejerk reaction against such policies is due to it being conflated as purely a muslim thing due to historical ignorance and remnants of several decades of jewish propaganda. I mentioned pater familias to remind people that a structured system to keep women in line is not foreign to western culture as many falsely believe.

2000 years ago or so Christianity was just another sect of Judaism and nothing more. It's only fitting that nowadays a lot of influential Christian preachers (Brother Nathaniel, Pastor Anderson) are Jews themselves. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Are you complaining about the empire being split up after Constantine I died? That's because he had 3 young sons in early 20s who initially agreed to share power, which is pretty fucking responsible.

Of course, eventually the youngest/oldest went to war and winner of that got killed by usurper, so Constantius who was chilling down in Egypt came up and kicked ass and then handed empire over to an Apostate upon his deathbed like a boss. Probably realized Jews were infiltrating them too.

In defense of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_(emperor) he tricked the Jews into paying for the temple then had his man spend the money building it on top of a fucking VOLCANO so he was probably trying to trick the Jews into a deathtrap but it blew too soon.

I'm still not sure what that has to do with Davidian ancestry of Mary TBH. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogy_of_Jesus#Maternal_ancestry_in_Luke implies that John is saying Luke dun goofed and it was Matthew's patrilineage which was the accurate one.

Next section has quote from rabbi Elijah via prince Adronicus:

>Why do Christians extol Mary so highly, calling her nobler than the Cherubim, incomparably greater than the Seraphim, raised above the heavens, purer than the very rays of the sun?

>For she was a woman, of the race of David, born to Anne her mother and Joachim her father, who was son of Panther.

>Panther and Melchi were brothers, sons of Levi, of the stock of Nathan, whose father was David of the tribe of Judah.

>jews could cut and harm themselves all they pleased, but it wasn't profitable for them to harm others. Imagine the terror those poor jews went through

Not enough, because obviously they were still doing it despite losing their profits (automatically freed slaves) which is why after Constantine I died his son Constantius II had to up the ante and execute the Jews who kept circumcizing their slaves so they would stop. They were obviously buying up slaves solely for the purpose of circumcising them. Mutilating the dicks of the non-consenting and feeding on their blood is one of Jews' primary drives, more important to them than money. Money is simply a means to this end.

>When you say "Constantine the GAReat" is that some sort of typo or are you making a reference to the Roman condiment known as "garum?" (Garum was a sort of fermented fish paste that was popular in Roman society)

It's a reference to the "GAR for Archer" meme. It's a term of appreciation.

>If 18 year old idiots want to get themselves cut, then go ahead.

The minimum age should actually be whatever minimum age we have highest for other stuff. In the US you need to be 21 to drink so that would be more reasonable than 18 for elective surgeries. This applies to trannies as well. An extra 3 years for the brain to mature before allowing irreversible mutilations is very reasonable.

First of all, the fact that so many of you "christians" apparently believe that anyone who rejects abrahamism is automatically a "fedora tipping" atheist is telling.

Most "abrahamists" can only see the plantation. They think that outside is only crazy people and fedoras. Typical.

Also, White achievements and White greatness are due to WHITE PEOPLE, not "christianity."

Seondly, the idea that a "fall of christianity" is the cause of modern "leftism, globalism, kikeism, multicult" and so forth is ridiculous. Numerous christian groups have been HEAVILY involved in the destruction of traditional White society and the importation of shitholers into White countries.

Of course, christianity and it's universalist values are NEVER to blame, right cuck?

>Christianity has some good points, but it is a slave religion that promotes obedience and "civic nationalism."

This. Even if you dismiss the arguments about its jewish origins and influences, the religion is still inherently cucked because of subservience to God The Constitution! instead of your people, and its egalitarian views on souls and converts.

Being against Christianity is one of the largest redpill hurdles one is able to do. It's been instilled from birth, and even when one starts to doubt parts of the status quo that is told to them, people still cling on to it as a form of kosher values because it is an anchor to the normalsphere that most people have heard of. Everything about your modern life from birth has been kiked.

Christfags, I've been digging into the Gospel about this lineage BS, how do you resolve this discrepency between Luke and Matthew seen in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zerubbabel#Zerubbabel_in_the_New_Testament and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogy_of_Jesus#Zerubbabel_son_of_Shealtiel ?

I have trouble telling the 4 bros apart so can someone educate me on who is more reliable here? In most cases they seem to be emphasizing the lineage of (Saint) Joseph (Mary's cucked husband) so why exactly does this even matter if they're saying he didn't plant his seed in her and was only Jesus' stepdad? It's like they knew everyone would just assume Joseph ejaculated in Mary to create Jesus and did it as some kind of pre-defense. Why would biological lineage of non-biological dad matter?

And? Accusing others of being affiliated with the devil is par for the course in virtually all abrahamic schisms. It doesn't change the fact that Jesus was explicitly a Jew by birth and raised in the Jewish religious tradition - from whence he split. Christianity is an extremely successful Jewish heresy as practiced by gentiles and no amount of wishful thinking or mental gymnastics can get you around that.

because christianity is a sect of judaism for gentiles, the ones who care about it are jews. The nly answer you're ever going to get is "we wuz da real jews" or "we jews now" and at the same time, you're going to be told "there's no such thing as jews any more"

It's generally accepted that Luke's genealogy details the ancestry of Mary, which as said before goes through Nathan making her a blood relation of David without being part of the accursed direct lineage of Solomon (which is cursed at "Jechonias" as quoted in your part (Jeremiah 22:30 Thus saith the Lord, Write ye this man childless, a man that shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah. ) - his curse was that his blood would never be King, making it impossible for Joseph to be the blood relation of Jesus - although he is still needed for Solomon).

Joseph was the rightful heir to the Throne of David, but his blood was cursed so that neither he nor his descendants could sit on it. However, if he adopts a son, (he did) that son is both first in his household and free of the tainted blood, and thus is eligible. Doubly so if that child is a grandchild of David by his mother's lineage, which he is.

This follows an established legal pattern:

Exodus 2:10; Moses was adopted by Pharaoh’s daughter, receiving all the rights, privileges and duties of a biological son, being educated as a prince.

1 Kings 11:20; Genubath was brought up by the queen, and was said to be among the sons of Pharaoh.

Rome was one of the biggest achievement (if not the best) of mankind. I hope that once the jew problem, the shitskinning problem is resolved, we can ever aspire to something at least as great as Rome, Sparta and The 3rd Reich.

3As I urged you on my departure to Macedonia, you should stay on at Ephesus to instruct certain men not to teach false doctrines 4or devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies, which promote speculation rather than the stewardship of God’s work, which is by faith. 5The goal of our instruction is the love that comes from a pure heart, a clear conscience, and a sincere faith

Check culture, history, etc, if you arent a pajeet then you are just another troll or irrelevant.

>white men is magicall

No, again, read about history, the history of white man is rise & fall every century untill christianity came, if it wasnt by christianity germans would be a bunch of inbreed shitskins and America would be a legend.

>christianity destroyed civilization

No, exactly the opposite, if you check how many civilizations had fallen then you will notice that the "great filter" is real and that christianity can push people beyond that.

Stop the disinfo please and go back to stormfront, stay there and never go back please.

Dubs confirm, Sparta was destroyed by a bunch of pedophiles and surpassed in every other sense by a bunch of flamboyant faggots, they were so fucking stupid that they werent capable of moving outside their city.

Watch "Marching To Zion". He admits to having Jewish parents, Jewish friends and relatives. He's another Jew who simply converted to Christianity to keep Whites in the dark. He's views on race are kosher as fuck.

This was a specific complaint leveled at the people in Ephesus. You are supposed to be interested in Christ's genealogy as it is a proof that He is who He says He is. I imagine the people in Ephesus were missing the point of Christianity and instead trying to trace their lineages back to the tribes of Israel (afterall a lot of people in the region would have blood from some of the tribes that were conquered and then consumed by Assyria).

What it actually says is that his grandmother has Ashkenazi blood. His parents are not jewish, his friends are not jewish, and there is no evidence to suggest that his Ashkenazi grandmother was actually jewish either. It is also entirely possible that it was thrown in as a typical 'trick' where they try to convince us all that we are part nigger, spic, chong and yid in an effort to 'combat racism'.

You can be against him marrying to people of a different race but spreading lies and distortions helps no one.

A good argument that I've heard is that even though these kosher nationalist claim that Jews are based for bringing up how Jews fight Islam,they completely ignore/don't bring up the Jew's role in the Islamization of Europe.

It's rather interesting to see these people who love how so many Jews are "based" for being anti-islam, but they suddenly want to murder you and your parents for stating the Jewish role in turning Europe and American non-white.

Anderson is anti-jew. You cannot call him 'kosher'. /pol/ is not happy about his views on races outside of jews as he sees it as irrelevant, but the guy is from a religious perspective very anti-jew and anti-muslim. It's only our version of 'virtue signallers' who hate him (and shills), as even if we disagree on a few points - he has a lot of ideas that we agree with, and can definitely be used to wake people up to certain truths. He made a whole video debunking the holocaust and has been banned from half of Europe.

>jews now have people coming to their doors begging for their services so their sons and daughters can move up in class

>trade their services while also gaining favor from the bottom rungs of society in due of "debt"

>few generations of this and you have grown men with freedoms in society who have their origin stories tied with the liberation from the jew, the then most hated thing in society

Its literally a cycle where once youre nearing the end of your epic in expelling parasites you have a new breed of fresh minds coming into the world only viewing the ass end of the tragedy, and so comes the traitors in our midst who believe it unjust, and especially when theyre under the psychology that if not for their mother letting the jew snip their skins at birth then they would be nothing but slaves in a world that has birth rights. It fucking mirrors our current crisis

He still promotes White genocide by bashing racial pride and marring White women to niggers. 1000 priests like him and even the most racially homogeneous society would be transformed into a miscegenation orgy with godly Christian niggers and their mongrel offspring running around. No Jews needed at all. Christians do Jews work for free. They simply use different talking points to justify it. Christians will make sure White race dies off, sacrificed on the altar of faith.

They killed people who slaughtered animals in the Kosher/Halal way. It was demanded that livestock be slaughtered the Mongol way (which is far more humane in that you crush the heart with your hand instead of just letting them painfully bleed out like the sandniggers/kikes do)

That's some ridiculous conclusion you've come to. He is not PRO- miscegenation, he does not go out of his way to marry whites to blacks, he simply marries people who come to him. He is not trying to cause everyone to become mixed - he just personally doesn't care. And that is certainly something you can object to, but to extrapolate from this that he wants to 'genocide whites' is ridiculous.

He might be wrong on somethings in your eyes, but he is not trying to destroy your people and much of what he does serves to protect your people. The idea that you have to agree with someone 100% on absolutely everything is a retarded 'progressive' concept. I can guarantee you that there are very few if any people on /pol/ who agree with one-another on EVERYTHING, and that's good. We agree on the core things.

Pastor Anderson clearly agrees with a lot of our core beliefs. He is radically opposed to judaism, islam, atheism, communism, homosexuality, transgenders, the nation of Israel, abortion, fornication, usury and he has openly spoken out debunking the holocaust. He is not a /pol/ack, but he is a very useful asset for us.

That happens to a people whenever their religion dies. See the last days of pagan rome; degeneracy, freeing the slaves, etc. Christianity isnt that unique in this respect. In a couple hundred years, when islam starts its death spiral, the same thing will happen to them.

That's precisely the problem right there. Miscegenation is the greatest sin against nature itself and a weapon used by Jews and their shabbos goys to kill the White race. Christians don't understand that and see no problem with niggers marring Whites. A Christian preacher marring a White woman to a nog and claiming "we are all of one blood" and "we're all mixed" is equally as bad as a Jew stating "there's only one race, the human race" or that the "White people don't really exist". It's a genocide and pastor Anderson willingly takes part in it proving once again how Jewish Christianity really is. When even the most based of Christians is just another civnat in all but name with some harder stance on Jews then Christianity has no place in White society at all. Anderson opposes Jews for all the wrong reasons because kikes don't want to mix with based niggers and as he puts it "the Jews are ones who pride themselves in their race and think they are purely Jewish" / "My philosophy is nothing like theirs". He dislikes Jews because Yids put their own well-being above all else, have no problem with their own racial pride and don't want to mix with niggers. All the thing good Christian like him finds abhorrent. What a great role model to follow.

atheism has always been around since the days of the ancient Greeks, bro. Probably long before too. There have always been people who are satisfied with what their senses tell them, and need nothing more.

I don't like miscegenation but it is not the greatest threat to our survival. Demographic replacement and the inevitable war that comes after is the biggest threat by a long way. Very few people race-mix. I see exposing the lies of the jews, particularly the holocaust, as one of the best things anyone can do for our side because it all begins to unravel after that; and then immigration, miscegenation and everything else gets confronted. Think about your own red-pilling; it began with something important to you, and then you realised how all these other things were affected and slowly but surely you realised more or less everything was wrong. You need to push that first domino for the rest to come tumbling down though; and there is no better domino that than the holocaust.

Has it though? The greatest of the Greeks believed in monotheism; Aristotle, Plato, Antisthenes. Most humans today are extremely superstitious with all sorts of rituals that they do; in an era where the belief in gods was the status quo, do you really think there were many people who would doubt them as a whole? They might not have been pious but I doubt there were many people who were what we would today call atheists.

Shying away from the race question is dangerous at best and traitorous at worst. The rate of interracial marriages is going up and I don't see Christians preaching against it. They accept it, they encourage it, they rationalize it and normalize it. It is a huge problem and if not swiftly dealt with then the US has no future. The White race will die out, mixed into extinction but Christianity will still survive among spics, mutts and nogs.

THIS is pilpul by the way. You direct the conversation away from all the positives of Paster Anderson by focusing on the one thing and then making the conversation about that instead. Classic jewish tactics. I have never said anything about condoning race-mixing; what I have said is that Anderson is a great asset for us because he destroys jews from a religious perspective and even goes so far as to debunk the holocaust. That's huge. That's what I'm focusing on. You can keep picking on other issues and blowing them up so as to make it appear as if he is only bad - but we know your tricks my hook-nosed friend.

What are you on? The fact that a few people were atheists means nothing at all unless they had some good reasoning. You said that we had 'atheist brothers' and I told you took look at how atheism started up in the West (it was at the behest of jews), and now you're saying that you think that might have been some Greeks who were atheists? Even if they were it matters not because they never did anything; all the greatest warriors, poets, artists, politicians and philosophers believed in God/s. What does this even have to do with anything? - You brought it up because I said Anderson opposes atheism and implied that it was a good thing. Judging by the fact that the majority of atheists today are willing jew servants; I stand by that assessment. Again I am thinking this is pilpul as you try to bring up some debate about atheism in ancient Greece as if that is relevant to anything.

Pilpul. This leads the discussion into: What started 'atheism' in Greece? But then we haven't actually ascertained that 'atheism' as perceived by people today ever existed in Greece. Why should we even care about atheism? … You are using a throw-away comment about something that Pastor Anderson opposes, which the vast majority of /pol/ opposes, as a means of derailing the thread and turning it into a harmless thread about atheism in ancient greece as opposed to attacking jews, exposing them with assets like Anderson and waking our people up.

You are at best an idiot, but I'm near certain you are a jew. Be gone from here.