@jodiecongirl I know of literally zero legitimate economists who think that externalities are irrelevant.

de1ong: But surely you know of many influential calling-themselves economists who think externalities are rarely important? & are in any case almost always dwarfed in the magnitude of their effects by the government failure losses that would be generated by any attempt to correct them? Cf.: https://t.co/D2Wn2SpdJxhttps://t.co/zgTiGEckxd

@janzilinski: K. Murphy, price theory phd class, a few years ago: "Externalities are the last refuge of scoundrels"

@jodiecongirl: what exactly did he mean by this...

@de1ong: the last excuse you give before you admit your real motive is a communistic hatred of freedom...

@jodiecongirl: this is why I chose my words carefully :)

@de1ong: & I had hoped you would tell me that John Cochrane is no longer an influential calling-himself economist... :-(

@jodiecongirl: he's on the list of people I want to shake and yell "I know you know market failures exist!"

@t0nyyates: I like reading his stuff, but it sends a chill down the spine.

@RyanWHerzog: Yet at EconED yesterday a panel of economists emphasized the need to spend more time on S&D, they cut externalities out of principles.

@de1ong: link?

@jodiecongirl: so this is the conference, though I'm not there so I don't have materials... https://t.co/BTxH94fLLK

@RyanWHerzog: Yeah... it was Tabborok, Jose, and Rubb.

@jodiecongirl: :(

@TwterlessKalina: Only one of them said they cut externalities out of principles. The context was how do we get our students to remember ANYTHING.

@RyanWHerzog: Under the general heading, how has teaching changed. The consensus was to place more emphasis on S&D. No one talked about equality.

@jodiecongirl: I think that's partially because there's no concrete definition of "equity," i.e. fairness, so economists don't have a lot concrete to say.

@de1ong: yes we do: Benthamite greatest good of the greatest number: max SWF as a sum of individual utilities w/ declining marginal utility of wealth...

Recent and Worth Highlighting...

About Brad DeLong

The Most-Recent Thirty

We Are with Her!

Looking Forward to Four Years During Which Most if Not All of America's Potential for Human Progress Is Likely to Be Wasted

With each passing day Donald Trump looks more and more like Silvio Berlusconi: bunga-bunga governance, with a number of unlikely and unforeseen disasters and a major drag on the country--except in states where his policies are neutralized.

Nevertheless, remember: WE ARE WITH HER!

Blogging: What to Expect Here

The purpose of this weblog is to be the best possible portal into what I am thinking, what I am reading, what I think about what I am reading, and what other smart people think about what I am reading...

"Bring expertise, bring a willingness to learn, bring good humor, bring a desire to improve the world—and also bring a low tolerance for lies and bullshit..." — Brad DeLong

"I have never subscribed to the notion that someone can unilaterally impose an obligation of confidentiality onto me simply by sending me an unsolicited letter—or an email..." — Patrick Nielsen Hayden

"I can safely say that I have learned more than I ever would have imagined doing this.... I also have a much better sense of how the public views what we do. Every economist should have to sell ideas to the public once in awhile and listen to what they say. There's a lot to learn..." — Mark Thoma

"Tone, engagement, cooperation, taking an interest in what others are saying, how the other commenters are reacting, the overall health of the conversation, and whether you're being a bore..." — Teresa Nielsen Hayden

"With the arrival of Web logging... my invisible college is paradise squared, for an academic at least. Plus, web logging is an excellent procrastination tool.... Plus, every legitimate economist who has worked in government has left swearing to do everything possible to raise the level of debate and to communicate with a mass audience.... Web logging is a promising way to do that..." — Brad DeLong

"Blogs are an outlet for unexpurgated, unreviewed, and occasionally unprofessional musings.... At Chicago, I found that some of my colleagues overestimated the time and effort I put into my blog—which led them to overestimate lost opportunities for scholarship. Other colleagues maintained that they never read blogs—and yet, without fail, they come into my office once every two weeks to talk about a post of mine..." — Daniel Drezner