Santa Rosa pressed forward with plans for a bicycle bridge over Highway 101 Tuesday after the outgoing council majority used a parliamentary technique to prevent the incoming majority from delaying the project.

In essence, the old council blocked the new council from blocking further study of bridge.

"It is time to move this project forward," Mayor Susan Gorin said.

Bike Bridge Vote At Santa Rosa City Council Meeting

Jessica Gilleran, from left, and Kevin Gilleran show their support of a Highway 101 pedestrian and bicycle overpass at Council Chambers during a meeting to discuss the bridge.

Mark Kenegos checks in a bicycle as a free parking service the Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition was offering to bicyclists that rode to the meeting at Council Chambers.

Bryan Mischke checks in his bike at the free bike parking area put on by the Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition before heading into Council Chambers during a meeting to discuss the Highway 101 pedestrian and bicycle overpass.

Standing room only in Council Chambers during a meeting to discuss the Highway 101 pedestrian and bicycle overpass.

Barrie Mason, center, holds up a sign showing her support of a pedestrian and bicycle overpass over Highway 101, during a meeting at Council Chambers, Dec. 7, 2010.

Standing room only in Council Chambers during a meeting to discuss the Highway 101 pedestrian and bicycle overpass.

On a night normally reserved for non-controversial items and praise for departing council members, dozens of residents — many wearing bicycle helmets and holding signs like "Bridge = Jobs" and "Bridge to the Future" — filled the council chamber to support a long-promised project they believed was in peril.

Councilmember John Sawyer last week voted in favor of studying the bridge further, but said he was doing so only to preserve his right to reconsider his vote this week, when a new council majority more favorable to his view took over.

Sawyer said he appreciated certain elements of the bridge and supported it in theory. But he said the timing was wrong to spend another $100,000 studying it, given the city's finances and the uncertainty about the location of a future commuter rail station.

"I stand by my original words of last week regarding my positive attitude toward the project, its design, the concept, how it might bring us into the future. I also stand by my concerns," Sawyer said last night. "We just disagree."

Last week, fearing that Sawyer was trying to derail the project, Gorin vowed to fill the council chamber with bicyclists and businesspeople supportive of the bridge. The Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition made sure of that, and its members turned out in force.

"Please build bridges," Barbara Moulton urged the council, speaking not just about the project but about the divisiveness that has plagued the council. "This overcrossing is something that will promote the greater good of our city."

Christine Culver, executive director of the bicycle coalition, performed a bit of political theater. Admitting she felt a little "silly" wearing her bicycle helmet, she urged everyone in the audience who supported the project and the jobs it would bring to stand up. A good majority of the room rose.

Speakers stressed the health benefits of bicycling, the improved safety for pedestrians and cyclists, and the environmental benefits of getting people out of their cars. They also stressed the jobs the project would create, and how the majority of the cost of the potentially $20 million project would be borne by state and federal dollars, not local funds.

One of the few only public detractors of the project to speak was Barbara Behnke, a senior citizen who said she lived through the Great Depression. She said the city has "overspent and overcommitted to large projects" and instead needed to focus on preserving vital city services like fire protection.

"Unfortunately the timing for this is bad, and in my view it goes to the bottom of the list," Behnke said.

She suggested supporters of the bridge hold fund-raisers to support the project.

But ultimately it wasn't political pressure that kept the project moving forward, but a bit of shrewd parliamentary maneuvering.

Gorin and her council allies realized they could prevent Sawyer from revisiting his vote if they beat him to the punch.

Instead of waiting for Sawyer to make good on his threat to reconsider his vote once the new council was seated, Councilwoman Veronica Jacobi — an avid cyclist and supporter of the bridge — made the same motion early in meeting, knowing it would fail.

On a 3-3 vote, Jacobi's motion did fail, preventing the new council from bringing the issue up again later in the evening. Council rules require a majority vote to revisit an item that has already been reconsidered during that meeting.

The bridge issue behind it, the council moved forward with the more ceremonial portion of the evening.

Jacobi, who lost her reelection bid, and Bender, who did not seek another term, were widely praised for their service.

Gorin, Jake Ours and Scott Bartley were sworn in, forming a council many view as likely to be more friendly to business and development interests.

The new council's first act was to elect Olivares as mayor and Jake Ours, former chairman of the city's Redevelopment Agency, as vice mayor.

Olivares smiled widely as Gorin handed over the gavel and he was given a standing ovation by the chamber. He said he believed voters in November made a "resounding statement" about what they wanted to see in the city.

"I believe this can and must be a time of reconciliation for our community. Our community deserves it, our future depends on it, and the voters demand it," Olivares said.

Santa Rosa pressed forward with plans for a bicycle bridge over Highway 101 Tuesday after the outgoing council majority used a parliamentary technique to prevent the incoming majority from delaying the project.

In essence, the old council blocked the new council from blocking further study of bridge.

"It is time to move this project forward," Mayor Susan Gorin said.

On a night normally reserved for non-controversial items and praise for departing council members, dozens of residents — many wearing bicycle helmets and holding signs like "Bridge = Jobs" and "Bridge to the Future" — filled the council chamber to support a long-promised project they believed was in peril.

Councilmember John Sawyer last week voted in favor of studying the bridge further, but said he was doing so only to preserve his right to reconsider his vote this week, when a new council majority more favorable to his view took over.

Sawyer said he appreciated certain elements of the bridge and supported it in theory. But he said the timing was wrong to spend another $100,000 studying it, given the city's finances and the uncertainty about the location of a future commuter rail station.

"I stand by my original words of last week regarding my positive attitude toward the project, its design, the concept, how it might bring us into the future. I also stand by my concerns," Sawyer said last night. "We just disagree."

Last week, fearing that Sawyer was trying to derail the project, Gorin vowed to fill the council chamber with bicyclists and businesspeople supportive of the bridge. The Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition made sure of that, and its members turned out in force.

"Please build bridges," Barbara Moulton urged the council, speaking not just about the project but about the divisiveness that has plagued the council. "This overcrossing is something that will promote the greater good of our city."

Christine Culver, executive director of the bicycle coalition, performed a bit of political theater. Admitting she felt a little "silly" wearing her bicycle helmet, she urged everyone in the audience who supported the project and the jobs it would bring to stand up. A good majority of the room rose.

"We're here because we want this," Culver said.

Speakers stressed the health benefits of bicycling, the improved safety for pedestrians and cyclists, and the environmental benefits of getting people out of their cars. They also stressed the jobs the project would create, and how the majority of the cost of the potentially $20 million project would be borne by state and federal dollars, not local funds.

One of the few only public detractors of the project to speak was Barbara Behnke, a senior citizen who said she lived through the Great Depression. She said the city has "overspent and overcommitted to large projects" and instead needed to focus on preserving vital city services like fire protection.

"Unfortunately the timing for this is bad, and in my view it goes to the bottom of the list," Behnke said.

She suggested supporters of the bridge hold fund-raisers to support the project.

But ultimately it wasn't political pressure that kept the project moving forward, but a bit of shrewd parliamentary maneuvering.

Gorin and her council allies realized they could prevent Sawyer from revisiting his vote if they beat him to the punch.

Instead of waiting for Sawyer to make good on his threat to reconsider his vote once the new council was seated, Councilwoman Veronica Jacobi — an avid cyclist and supporter of the bridge — made the same motion early in meeting, knowing it would fail.

On a 3-3 vote, Jacobi's motion did fail, preventing the new council from bringing the issue up again later in the evening. Council rules require a majority vote to revisit an item that has already been reconsidered during that meeting.

The bridge issue behind it, the council moved forward with the more ceremonial portion of the evening.

Jacobi, who lost her reelection bid, and Bender, who did not seek another term, were widely praised for their service.

Gorin, Jake Ours and Scott Bartley were sworn in, forming a council many view as likely to be more friendly to business and development interests.

The new council's first act was to elect Olivares as mayor and Jake Ours, former chairman of the city's Redevelopment Agency, as vice mayor.

Olivares smiled widely as Gorin handed over the gavel and he was given a standing ovation by the chamber. He said he believed voters in November made a "resounding statement" about what they wanted to see in the city.

"I believe this can and must be a time of reconciliation for our community. Our community deserves it, our future depends on it, and the voters demand it," Olivares said.