I do understand some of my "desires" oppose the very basics of the Kasama philosophy. TT servo shafts, thin frame and boom, adjustable gear train are trade marks of the Kasama design. I am not expecting them to change those any time soon, just voicing my opinion in hopes they might consider them.

I believe Kasama can do a brilliant helicopter with exceptional quality without going to extremes in innovation. I would focus on simplicity, low parts count, robustness and precision. My take is double stage gear trains are much more interesting these days than normal big main gear designs. Be it full gears or a belted first stage you get a very thin profiled frame as Kasama likes.

Maybe I am too much into European helis after I got my TDR, but that design, with the Diabolo, Voodoo and Banshee are a nice trend. Banshee actually, that could have easily been a Kasama design!

If redisigning the FAIFA is not planned, I would avoid the temptation to go into the 800 until that market grows and maybe do a stretched 500 in 470mm blades like Logo 400SE, Voodoo 400, stretched Protos, or even do a great 450 like the Warp 360 seems to be.

i think if you want low parts count and design for dummies then get a different heli! most of the unike features are what defines Kasama!
+1 for the slanted gears all over!
i agree also the new head LRH could be standard!
wider frames and bigger boom would be nice to reduce vibe issues but would mean more weight and less efficency and a major redesign! i can live with the frame like it is!
may be a spacer or bigger patts for the elevator servo to mount to widen the range of motors to be used!

I have chosen other helis for simplicity. I then learnt performance and simplicity are not mutually opposed. TDR and Diabolo are brilliant performers without the complexity. Voodoo too. Logos of course. There are these options in the market and Kasama could be in the same league without loosing its appeal. It can still have innovative features and not be complex. Rotor head is brilliant, tail almost as well, lightness, exceptional materials, great parts fit, all are great qualities that can remain. Crown gear could be as simple as going Mod 1.25 as the TDR. A wider boom is just a functional change, no need to have it thin. I just mentioned the things that make me choose it the least among my fleet. It's flying every now and then.

For me its the one heli I can always go back to and just have a ball with. I love it, simply awesome.

I would not change the batt locations. I would however make some sort of change to how the ESC mounts and allow for the wires coming out going to the batts. I would do away with the crown gear too and go for a more conventional set up like some others as this is prob the only weak point. Everyone always moans about it.
A thicker boom only for aesthetics as it kinda looks a bit odd with the size of the canopy then the tiny boom sticking out of the back.

I don't own any of the Kasama choppers, but I always loved the look of the Srimok 90 nitro and I would really like to see an electric version of it. The canopy and the carbon skids look amazing. I know the carbon skids were weak, but they make the chopper look really nice. I don't really like the Faifa canopy. If Kasama made a new Faifa with all the mentioned upgrades and made it look like the Srimok nitro, I would buy it for sure.

I've been looking for electric conversions of the nitro, but I haven't found anyone that has done that yet.