Saturday, 29 July 2017

The
film Dunkirk provides a gripping expose of the reality of war. The futile loss
of life and the problematic nature of survival is all laid bare. Dunkirk also
offers a masterclass in suspense, never knowing what is coming next as you live
every moment with those struggling to escape the beach.

There
is relief as a group of soldiers appear to have survived on a ship, only to
have that joy immediately torn away as a torpedo rips into the vessel,
transforming in an instance the scene from one of celebration into that of a watery
grave. The only way in which the suspense is tempered is when you realise that
one of the film’s stars is not going to be killed in the first few minutes.

There
is no glorification of war in this epic. Whilst the gory nature of war, with
dismembered bodies is not part of the scene, the whole wasteful nature of
conflict is well illustrated. Courage too is paramount, among sailors, fighter
pilots and those who set off in the small boats from Britain to rescue the
troops on the beach

Dunkirk
should do much to open the eyes of some who glory in war. Those (usually male) who
celebrate war and weaponry, often from a safe distance. The sight of someone
being torn apart by a landmine or some such other weapon is not a pleasant
sight to see.

War
is the ultimate failure of the human condition, a failure to resolve
differences without resorting to killing one another, not something to
celebrate but remember in the hope that it will not recur again. Dunkirk
contributes much to the process of active remembering.

Tuesday, 25 July 2017

Whilst much has rightly been made of the gender gap in BBC pay, what really outrages the mass of people is the even bigger gap between these salaries and their own. How can it be justifiable in a country that has millions struggling by on the minimum wage, going to food banks just to be fed, to be paying people £500k to read the news. It is obscene.

Sunday, 23 July 2017

The cycle from Winchelsea Beach in
East Sussex to Pett Level is a short but mesmerising journey. A couple of miles
in length, on the one side is the sea, jagged rocks rising out of the sand at
low tide. On the other side sheep grazing in fields as far as the eye can see.

At Pett, when the tide is at its
lowest, the remnants of the old stone age forest can be seen buried in the
beach.

On the day of my ride, the sun
shone bright amid a blue sky. There were curlews poking around the
rocks, the occasional one taking off with that low trajectory flight, heading
out to sea before veering in, probably to land in one of the pools at Rye
Harbour.

Coming the other way to land was
the Oystercatcher, that distinctive black and white pattern progressing low
across the sea. An energetic flight, with wings beating, as it cuts across
above the surf, the distinctive red beak just visible.

Already, on the beach among the
rocks are the imperious looking egrets. A member of the heron family, the all
white egret has a regal pose standing amid the many rock pools.

The return journey involved
cutting in from the road to join the footpath running parallel through the fields all
the way to Winchelsea. Rugged in places the picturesque route has the Royal
Military Canal on one side, with lakes and fields on the other.

A kestrel rises from a nearby
field, hovers, hunting its prey before making off. A matter of minutes later
another kestrel almost replicates the flight of the first – clearly an
attraction, a fellow admirer watches through binoculars from the hill opposite.

A cormorant comes whirring across
the sky, a lumbering flight, no doubt off to Rye Harbour. Viewing the cormorant landing front on, it quickly becomes clear how much aviation has borrowed from the natural world of bird flight - feet coming down in similar style to wheels on a plane about to land

Three egrets sit in a tree
overlooking the canal – they fly off as I approach.

There is though also a reminder of
the harsh world of nature, with a dead sheep spread-eagled in the water.

The journey continues past fields
of broad beans on the right – no black fly there – how do they do that?
Finally, the journey through the fields in the sun ends at the base of the hill
near Winchelsea, time to return back to base along the road in the opposite direction. A quick vignette of
nature both stunning and harsh in the same instant.

Wednesday, 12 July 2017

The recent success of the England under 20 and under 21 teams has reignited the debate about the development of young players for the national team.

The under 20s won the World Cup, whilst the under 21s reached the semi-final of Euro tournament but the big question now is what happens next.

The young players have returned to their clubs to continue development but how much chance will they be given at the highest level?

Over recent years, it has been noticeable how the number of young players coming through the ranks to take their place in the first teams of Premiership football teams has been dwindling.

Clubs increasingly look for instant success, which most often sees foreign players bought in from Europe. There is no need to develop the player, as has to happen with the youngsters brought through the systemThe foreign player can, as it were, be bought off the shelf – the finished product, who can be relied upon to do a good job week in week out.

Managers will claim they are under pressure the whole time to compete, failure means the sack, with owners having high expectation and low patience levels when it comes to success.

The sacking of Southampton manager, Claude Puel, having secured eight place in the Premier league and a League Cup final appearance in his first season was proof of the high expectations even among what would be considered middle ranking clubs. Watford are another example, where changing managers appears to be an annual ritual regardless of how things have gone on the pitch.

The fans ofcourse are also fickle, they want success but also like to see the local home grown players coming through to represent the club.

The feelings of the fans on these matters was nicely illustrated a month ago when West Ham co-chairman David Gold tweeted to the effect that it would be unlikely that a home grown teenager would break into the club’s first team anytime soon.

The comment did not go down well among fans of a club that earned much of its name and reputation on bringing through young talent. Hammers fans chests swell with pride, as they talk of “the academy” that brought through the likes of Bobby Moore, Martin Peters, Geoff Hurst, Trevor Brooking, Joe Cole Michael Carrick, Rio Ferdinand, Frank Lampards (father and son) and Jermain Defoe.

What did the comment say to the present crop of promising youngsters at the club? Players like Reece Oxford, Reece Burke, Josh Cullen, Declan Rice, Tony Martinez and Martin Samuelsen. It is also particularly galling for some players, who left the junior ranks of bigger clubs, because they believed there would be a chance at West Ham.

Indeed, West Ham’s once proud record of bringing through young players is becoming a more distant memory than the old Boleyn ground at Upton Park. The last youngster to really make it in the first team and endure was James Tomkins, who made his debut in 2008. He was sold last summer to Crystal Palace. Tomkins came through under the managership of Gianfranco Zola, who was the last West Ham manager to really give kids a chance. Others from that era,like Jack Collinson (retired due to injury), Junior Stanislas (Bournemouth) and Zavon Hines (Southend) have since departed or left football.

Many fans thought things would improve when Slaven Bilic took over as manager from Sam Allardyce, who really had no time for bringing young players through. At the end of Bilic’s first season (2015/16), the youngsters won the Premier League Under 21 cup. Bilic promised that the young players would be around the first team squad or loaned out. Plenty were loaned out but few featured for the first team. Some like Reece Oxford seem to have gone backwards.

Adding to the ire of the fans was a recruitment policy that saw some very average players being bought in from abroad. Some felt that many offered little more than the club’s youngsters, who were being denied a chance.

The West Ham way, which has now become buying in a foreign team to represent the local east London area, is not untypical amongst Premiership football teams, which will regularly field a team of all foreign players. But what does this do for the national team?

A number of times over recent years, England teams have been fielded with players that could not get into their club sides. There have been players, like Sean Wright Phillips, who have been signed by the big clubs, only to then be left on the sideline rather than get the first team action required to develop to the maximum of their abilities. Arguably, Alex Oxlade Chamberlain, Theo Walcott at Arsenal have suffered a similar fate. Had they remained a little longer at Southampton they may have got more chances, more quickly.

Some clubs are better than others at bringing young players through. Southampton have a proud record of giving young talent a chance, which still appears to be the case, with the likes of James Ward Prowse prospering at the club.

Spurs manager Mauricio Pochettino has managed to combine developing young talent, like Harry Kane, Kieran Trippier and Deli Ali, with buying in foreign players, to create a Premiership challenging team.

It is this sort of progressive approach that is needed if those young players who have done so well in the international tournaments are to progress to the top level. They no doubt have the talent but need to be given the chance to succeed.

Not so long ago, fans took a more tolerant attitude if a young player was being given his chance and made a mistake or two – it was all part of the learning process. Eventually, the finished product would take shape and everyone would be happy. Today fans, as well as owners are less forgiving. However, if the young players are to develop, then they must be given that chance.

There clearly is another generation of exciting talent coming through in this country. Players that could one day be part of a successful national team. However, that will only happen if they are given a chance, a chance that must include the possibility of failure now and again.*Clubs must support their young players - published Morning Star - 20/7/2017

Friday, 7 July 2017

There has been much said about the post
truth society, particularly in the wake of the Brexit vote in the UK and Donald
Trump’s victory in the US, but surely a lot of the responsibility for this
phenomena rests with journalists themselves.

Take the Brexit vote, when two of the
leading advocates, Boris Johnson and Michael Gove, just happened to be
journalists. Ok, they were in the government but neither hesitated to use the
channels available via their past profession to advance lies like the £350
million a week that would be going to the NHS if the country left the EU.

Some have argued that neither
individual expected to succeed with their campaign to withdraw from the EU but
they saw it as a good wheeze. Famously, Johnson wrote the two columns for
publication, one for staying and the other for going.

Beyond these individuals there are
three other clear examples of the British media contributing to the creation of
the post truth world.

The first was the ascent of Nigel
Farage and UKIP to a place of significance in the political lexicon.

UKIP were a little known force of no
more significance than the British National Party until some media outlets
decided to give the party huge exposure. The excuse at the time - when there
was an outcry about allowing BNP leader Nick Griffin a pew on the BBC’s
Question Time programme - was that
covering UKIP was the more palatable option in terms of covering far right
politics.

This view may or may not have been
valid but what is for sure is that the publicity given to UKIP but denied the
BNP saw the former rise to a position where it could dictate policy on Europe
and immigration, whilst the other largely withered and died.

Farage himself was goldust particularly
for producers of broadcast mediums. A media star, always ready with the quick
soundbite and witty quip. A man from a City background, who pitched himself as
a man of the people.Forever seen in a
pub with a pint, the Farage image appealed to the populist discontents. Farage
amounted to good box office for the media.

There was precious little effort made
for a long time to scrutinise the members of UKIP. Eventually some of the barn
pot stories began to emerge, like the individual who blamed bad weather on
voting for gay marriage and another who referred to bongo bongo land.

Farage though largely remained
untainted. Notably, during the referendum campaign, after declaring there would
be violence on the streets if immigration was not curbed,the response from the BBC interviewer
concerned was “want an ice cream Nigel.”

Indeed, the BBC deserves high marks in
the post truth stakes when it comes to UKIP. The Corporation gave the party so
much air time it was ludicrous. UKIP has appeared on 25% of the flagship weekly
Question Time since 2010. The party itself got a regular pew to the exclusion
of other parties, like the Greens (7%) and more recently the Liberal Democrats,
despite its lack of Parliamentary seats.

The result of this easy run for UKIP was
a large contribution being made to the EU referendum debate. Indeed, Farage and
his party can take high marks for making immigration such a central issue in
securing a leave vote last June.

The second area where untruths can be
said to have abounded has been the coverage of immigration. This debate was
increasingly shaped by the right wing tabloids like the Mail, Sun and Express.
Any negative story relating to migrants was given full play without any sign of
balance the other way. A migrant who committed a crime would be given front
page billing, whilst the positive contribution of overseas students to the
university system and GDP of the country never appeared.

The lack of any positive news regarding
migration in a country looking for scapegoats at austere economic times
resulted in a logical conclusion.

The drip drip negativity regarding the
immigration debate had its impact with the whole context being set according to
the UKIP/Migration Watch agenda that there are too many migrants in the country
and that they must be reduced. This negativity provided the key to securing the
leave vote in the EU referendum.

Finally, there was the referendum
question itself, where a whole number of untruths were put out into the public
lexicon and not really challenged. This applied to both sides of the argument.
The leave side had things like the £350 million change, whilst remain warned of
the immediate dire economic consequences of a leave vote. Both claims make
great examples of untruths in the post truth world.

The development of the post truth world
has ofcourse also been hugely aided by the development of social media.
Courtesy of the likes of Facebook and Twitter, individuals can surround
themselves with like minded people, who just provide echo chambers for their
own thoughts and prejudices. These prejudices are not challenged but reinforced
in such a context.

So we have post truth, a situation
where facts don’t matter. If a particular scenario does not fit with the
prejudices of an individual then they can be dismissed as untrue. The scenarios
that fit with those prejudices become truth.

It is a highly dangerous world,
amounting to a mass of people continually putting two and two together but
failing to come up with four.

The Brexit vote and triumph of Trump in
America are due in the main to the way in which the mass of working people have
been made to pay for the banking crisis of 2008. The austerity measures, the
lack of pay rises and job insecurity have bred the discontent. But instead of
seeing the causes and maybe asking for more from the rich and those who created
the crisis in the first place, other scapegoats have been found such as
migrants and the EU. It is a worrying world where ignorance almost becomes a
badge of honour for many people.

Many in the media at the moment are
struggling to try to put truth back on the agenda. In America, the post truth
world has reached such a level that the President can cut out a large number of
the news media on the basis that they are not telling his truth. Whilst it must
be hoped that some sanity returns, the media have a long way to go to get back
to a truth based world. What is more before that can happen, some need to hold
up their hands and admit to the role they have played in creating the post
truth world in the first place. Covering serious issues was seen as a game,
entertainment triumphed over information and education functions of media. The
result, the host of a reality TV game show is not President in the White House
and Britain is set to leave the EU.* published 14/7/2017 -Tribune - "The media have played a major role in creating the post truth world"

Wednesday, 5 July 2017

Jimmy Mcgovern's "Broken"was a brilliant drama, using Sean Bean's character Michael Kerrigan as the vehicle to look at a number of social problems.
The tone is similar to that of Ken Loach's film, I Daniel Blake, pulling together issues hitting people today in an engaging narrative.
Broken, though, could also be seen as an advert for the Catholic Church and the priesthood, showing both at their best - a supportive community, with an empathetic priest, committed to the fight for social justice. A priest, who is more social worker than police officer to his flock. The characters are brilliantly drawn, showing both good and ill. If only there were more such communities and priests around. Sadly, the peculiar nature (terms and conditions of employment) of the priesthood, often draws in the strangest individuals, who certainly have the demons of the Kerrigan character but lack the empathy and thirst for justice. There are some about but too few. Surprising, that the Church has not more openly embraced the drama, maybe those in the hierarchy see the Kerrigan character as too challenging, an activist priest getting involved? Broken though should be seen as a call to stand up and fight for justice in an increasingly unequal and divided society. A really authentic piece of work from a great writer and dramatist.