This copy is for your personal non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies of Toronto Star content for distribution to colleagues, clients or customers, or inquire about permissions/licensing, please go to: www.TorontoStarReprints.com

Virginia lawmaker wants to declare porn a public health hazard

Republican delegate Robert Marshall has proposed a resolution stating that pornography leads to many social problems and that there is a “need for education, prevention, research, and policy change.”

The legislation frames pornography not just as a moral scourge that leads to infidelity, but as a weapon against women. It blames porn for ‘low self-esteem and body image disorders’ and devotes a lot of attention to the objectification of women. (shutterstock)

By Laura VozzellaThe Washington Post

Thu., Dec. 29, 2016

RICHMOND, VA.—A Virginia lawmaker is asking the state legislature to declare pornography a public health hazard — a move he hopes will pave the way for limits of some sort.

Republican delegate Robert Marshall has proposed a resolution stating that pornography leads to many social problems and that the Virginia General Assembly, which convenes its annual session on Jan. 11, needs to do something about it. Just what lawmakers should do is unspecified.

The measure does not call for any sort of ban, only a broad recognition of “the need for education, prevention, research, and policy change at the community and societal level in order to address the pornography epidemic that is harming the people of the Commonwealth and the nation.”

He compared the value of the declaration to the one former U.S. surgeon general Luther L. Terry made in 1964 with the first official report to link cigarettes to disease.

“We’ve got to say, ‘This is a problem,’” Marshall said in an interview Thursday. “Before smoking was identified as a problem, at least the recognition that it led to certain pathologies was a starting point to put restrictions on it . . . If you recognize it as a problem, then you’re going to try to find ways to solve it within the framework of the statutes we can pass and the institutions we have.”

Article Continued Below

Claire Guthrie Gastanaga, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Virginia, expressed concern that the ultimate goal might be some form of censorship. She did not take a formal position though, because she had not yet studied the proposal.

“Obviously we’re cautious about anything that looks like it ultimately aims to regulate the content of speech, although we don’t like pornography any better than anybody else,” she said.

Marshall is one of the General Assembly’s most outspoken conservatives but he has an independent streak that sometimes appeals to the left. On some privacy and surveillance issues, for instance, he has found common ground with civil libertarians. Liberals joined his efforts in recent years to compensate Virginians who were forcibly sterilized between 1924 and 1979 under a state eugenics program.

His pornography resolution has the potential to create some strange bedfellows even if the ACLU does not warm to it. The legislation frames pornography not just as a moral scourge that leads to infidelity, the “hypersexualization of teenagers” and “deviant sexual arousal,” but as a weapon against women. The measure blames pornography for “low self-esteem and body image disorders” and devotes a lot of attention to the objectification of women and girls.

It reads, in part: “WHEREAS, because pornography treats women as objects and commodities for the viewer’s use, it teaches girls that they are to be used and teaches boys to be users; and WHEREAS, pornography normalizes violence and abuse of women and children; and WHEREAS, pornography treats women and children as objects and often depicts rape and abuse as if such acts are harmless . . .”

The resolution piqued the interest of state Sen. Barbara Favola, a Democrat and one of the legislature’s staunchest defenders of women’s rights. She has often been at odds with Marshall on the issue of abortion, which he strongly opposes.

“We will talk about it in the women’s health caucus, I’m sure of that,” she said. “He’s right: pornography does have a negative impact on public health and it does lead to lots of other issues. I’m going to look at it.”

The Toronto Star and thestar.com, each property of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited, One Yonge Street, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5E 1E6. You can unsubscribe at any time. Please contact us or see our privacy policy for more information.

More from the Toronto Star & Partners

LOADING

Copyright owned or licensed by Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or distribution of this content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited and/or its licensors. To order copies of Toronto Star articles, please go to: www.TorontoStarReprints.com