PER CURIAM: Derrick Shawn Turner appeals his guilty pleas to murder and first-degree burglary. He maintains his guilty pleas were not intelligent and voluntary and failed to conform to the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). Turner’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved, stating she reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. Turner did not file a prose brief. After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Turner’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, HUFF, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.