In the December 15, 2007 Headlines news, the CNN’s anchor Shihab Rattansi (http://www.cnn.com/CNN/anchors_reporters/rattansi.shihab.html) interpreted [as opposed to real reporting] the tenths of thousands mainstream guilty Palestinian Arabs in the pro-Hamas rally, where they chanted support for the pro-mass-murder party, with typical of that death cult vocabulary, words like “Hamas isn’t afraid of death”.

Worst did he do, as so outrageously he didn’t stop there, he dared used what the bloody terrorists themselves “claim” in their propaganda, he added the dreadful words: “…the political movement Hamas, the uprising against the Israeli occupation“.

What “occupation” is Hamas against, even if one would buy the notion that the 1967 borders are considered “occupied territories” (though there was never a “Palestine” Arab sovereign nation, si “who” exactly is Israel supposedly “occupying”, but let’s assume that Pallywood term just for the sake of the argument, since the “Palestinians” have alraeady won in their propagnada to establish the 1967 added territories as “occupation”), since they want all of the land (just before they finalize their Caliphate global domination ultimate goal).

This line of propaganda “reporting” is not only pure pro terror propaganda, but it’s also dangerous for all of the west, Islamists see us all as one, and swallowing -justifying one Jihadi card is the same as swallowing-justifying Al Qaeda, Taliban or other Islamic fascists’ cards.

By this line of “politicizing” fascistic genocide CNN is supporting bloody Hamas, as in:

Hamas reiterates goal of world domination by Islam – annihilation …The PA sources further asserted that senior Fatah and Hamas terrorist leaders, as well as senior security officials from Egypt and Israel, know many details …http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/2790

[ISLAMIC LOBBY ‘MPAC’ THE BULLY]Muslims bully Muslims over selling Israeli produce12/10/2007By Rachel Fletcher
A campaign by the Muslim Public Affairs Committee (MPAC) to bully Muslim shop-owners not to sell Israeli produce “verges on antisemitism”, an interfaith activist said this week.

Richard Stone, founder and president of Muslim-Jewish dialogue group Alif-Aleph UK, said the tactics by MPAC, which calls on its website for pressure against shops that carry Israeli stock, were “not constructive”.

The lobby group’s campaign, timed to coincide with the holy month of Ramadan, includes calls to boycott Sabar Bros in Slough for stocking Israeli “blood” dates, giving the shop’s address and phone number.

Complaining that the shop “supports Israel”, the site urges: “Don’t be silent in the face of oppression — please phone them now and tell them you will boycott their shop unless they stop selling Israeli produce.”

MPAC’s website states: “The dates in your household which you may be using to break your fasts with, despite being from a Muslim-owned shop, may well be fuelling the Israeli economy.”

It said eight Muslim-owned businesses in Manchester had been visited. Six of them carried Israeli stock.

The campaigners complain that several businessmen — whose shops they did not name — had said they would continue to sell the Israeli products.

Mr Stone told the JC: “This sort of digging around to find the smallest possible bit of Israeli activity, anything that could possibly be criticised, verges in my view on antisemitism.

“This encourages people to be hostile to people who have sympathy for the Israeli position, in the same way I would not want Jewish people to promote hostility to Palestinians on the grounds of what a minority of Palestinian people do.

“A lot of anti-Israel stuff has tones which slip over into being antisemitic. There should be nothing political to divide Muslims and Jews in this country and importing the crisis is often found objectionable by Israelis and Palestinians here.”

Sabar Hussain, the owner of the Slough shop, Sabar Bros, said he was receiving four or five calls a day, pressuring him to stop selling Israeli produce.

He told the JC: “We are open for everyone, not just Muslims. Is it illegal to sell Israeli dates? There is demand for them.Everyone in Slough sells these dates, so why are they mentioning my name? If you don’t want to buy Israeli products, don’t buy them.”

Mr Hussain, who said he intended to contact his local MP, added: “Some callers say things like, ‘You are not Muslim, you’re supporting Israel.’ If people were polite I might consider what they are asking, but this makes me want to go on selling them.”

MPAC’s website claimed that the Appna Cash and Carry in Manchester had declined to put up their flyers for fear of offending, but had a policy of not knowingly selling Israeli dates.

Manager Naseer Ahmed said he had long refused to stock Israeli dates, but had never heard of MPAC or been approached by them.

“It is possible they spoke to someone on the shop floor,” he said, adding: “I have political reasons [for not carrying Israeli stock]. In the time of apartheid, I didn’t sell South African products.”

An MPAC spokesman told the JC: “Some people in the Muslim community have a village mentality. They can’t think ethically and are more profit-motivated.”

In response to the bloodshed, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ more moderate Fatah movement urged him to consider breaking off contacts with the Israeli government, despite his pledge to the United States to hold regular meetings with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. Hamas and Fatah are partners in a coalition government.

1. The so-called “five-month-old cease-fire” between Palestinians and Israelis never existed because Palestinians have been lobbing rockets into Israel almost on a daily basis.

2. You can’t blame Israel for “breaking a cease-fire” that never existed because Palestinians never adhered to it to begin with.

3. Fatah is not a “moderate movement”. It is no less a terrorist ogranization than Hamas is. An implication that Fatah is “more moderate” than Hamas is just a plain lie. And by saying that Fatah is “more moderate” than Hamas, AP’s Arab journalists make you think that Hamas is moderate but not as moderate as Fatah.

Not only did she avoid mentioning the Saudi (Arab) lobby, which is by far the most powerful lobby in America, but she also chose to solicit the opinions of former U.S. President Jimmy Carter (himself a lobbyist for Arab causes), as well as professor Mearsheimer, both known for their controversial anti-Israel positions. Stunningly, no expert contradictory opinion to these two was offered during the six-hour program. It would have been just as easy for Amanpour to pose the same questions to Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz or Professor Fouad Ajami.

Luxury of ONE or two Arab “Palestinians” is more worth than LIVES of scores of Israelis?

You haven’t missed anything if you haven’t seen the propaganda piece “God’s warriors”, or the bigoted part therein where a ‘Palestinian’ complains about the wall…

The Threat

Everybody knows what a genocide bomber is, everybody knows the massacres by “freedom fighters” ‘Palestinians’ as well as their reduction thereof after the erection of the security wall, or what radical ‘Palestinians’ intentions are, in their charter, as well as here and there declarations, from annihilation of all non Muslims, non Arabs [aka Jews, “throwing them all to the sea”, “drinking their blood”, “wiping off maps”, you name it] in the area, to their global Islamic war, from Seville in Spain [yes, Hamas wants that too] to the Global Islamic repressive Caliphate, where any real [no, not the Carter-propaganda slur type] South African ‘Apartheid’ is luxuary against that Islamic ultimate ‘plan’ to oppress all non Muslims under Sharia.

The necessity & the uncomplaining Israelis

So everybody knows why Israel needs an Israel DEFENSE force, more check points than just in airports which we are all accustomed to, you don’t hear Israeli Jews complaining day and night to TV cameras for their hardship in being checked (almost) 24/7 to any public place, from the supermarket to the arena.

The issue by biased journalism is not security and lives but a luxury of one or two ‘Palestinians’

Let’s be honest the democratic State of Israel’s court did rule to change the outline of the security-fence, so not to make hardship for some Arab families, even though the fence, the shield is about saving lives. But the Israeli courts = ‘equal for all’ and often favoring Arabs over Israeli-Jews (yes, that is missing from Jimmy Carter’s book too), now, show me ONE Jewish family living in [not only ‘Apartheid Palestine’ but ultimately] racist ‘Palestine’! Still. most ‘Palestinians’ want to cross over & work in Israel, because it’s a better, it’s a free & open country, so naturally some of them would complain about the “inconvenience” of a wall. Try to get the BBC, or CNN’s Christianne Amanpour to talk about the saving lives objective, nah, it’s not “news”, news is bashing Israel, anyone that can put struggling Israel in a bad light is old/new “news”.

Short ‘history’ of the Islamic Apartheid’s invention of ‘Apartheid slur’ upon Israel’s democracy

Actually it’s not just one idiotic journalist quoting the ugly cliche line like: “some critics call the wall apartheid wall”, first the racist “apartheid slur” which is just that, stressing the luxury of one or two Arabs over Israel’s lives-savings, was only the language by the darama-dictionary of the fake “Palestinians” PALLYWOOD, then the UK’s ‘The Guardian’ started to use it mercilessly [for the heck of it, it’s the same biased paper that was stubborn to counter with an amateur respond, the processionals that proved that the Arab family on Gaza-beach 2006, was bombed by a Hamas mine and not by IDF], then recently the infamous Arab Muslim lobby paid Jimmy Carter [the worst ex-president, the one at fault of installing the Islamic totalitarian theocracy, the oppression, mass torture, mass killings, and all crimes against humanity being perpertrated upon the Iranian people, and ultimately the menace of a nuclear bomb upon the entire world by Adolph Ahmadinejad] to use it.

Has it ever occurred to these journalists that anti-Israel fascists do NOT have real “issues”?

Part of it is also the notion , oh if the “palestinians” complain, so it must be THE issue, after all, to every war there are two sides, Is it deliberate or naive, that the journalists can’t get the reality, harsh as it might be, simply, that the Arabs are racists, that the Muslims are intolerant of anyone being there? Yesterday it was so called “land”, today it’s a “wall”, and What was it in 1929 [Hebron massacre]?

If a picture is worth a thousand words, what is the power of a FAKE picture from “Palestinian” aggressors playing the “victim” cloth?
How can any words undue the influence their criminal industry has already done???

Some samples:

The infamous FAKE Video of Muhammad Al Dura… that was actually murdered by… Arab “Palestinian” Muslims… (well, it wouldn’t be the first boy murdered by them and blamed on Israel… another (at least known one) is 2 boys in a cave in the Rafah region).
But the power of the pictures is stronger than the truth.
Who will see Israel’s true humane image after this immense damage?

PMW reported yesterday that Palestinian Authority
(PA) TV has been broadcasting a falsified video clip of the
events on the Gaza beach on Friday in an attempt to blame Israel
for the deaths. [Yesterday’s bulletin is reprinted below.]

In the new falsification, an unrelated video clip
of an Israeli missile boat was edited into news footage to make
it appear as if the Israeli boat intentionally fired on civilians.
This is the same technique that PA TV used after Muhammad Al-Dura
was killed in a cross fire in the Gaza Strip in 2000. Subsequent
analysis of that incident has shown that Palestinian fire likely
killed the boy. But the PA TV propaganda clip inserted footage
of an Israeli soldier from a completely different incident to
make it look as if a soldier deliberately aimed at and shot
Al-Dura. That doctored video clip was broadcast hundreds of
times on PA TV.

Palestinian Authority TV has been
repeatedly broadcasting a falsified video clip of the events
surrounding the deaths of seven family members on the Gaza beach on
Friday. In an attempt to blame Israel’s navy for the deaths, PA TV
took unrelated video of an Israeli missile boat firing at Gaza
earlier in the day and edited them into the scenes, creating the
impression Israeli responsibility.

The following is the time
frame of the PA TV editing and falsification:

00:00-0:32
seconds: PATV clip introduces the scene by showing an
Israeli missile boat firing on the Gaza coast. Audio of ambulance
siren is added to visual to create false impression that boat was
shooting at same time as ambulances were present.

0:32-1:05
seconds: Scene switches directly to the victims, creating
a false connection between the events.

1:05-1:09
seconds: PA TV returns to the naval vessel showing sailor
with binoculars looking at shore, again creating the false
impression he is observing the evacuation.

1:09-2:00
seconds: The evacuation scene continues ending with the
word “Why” on the screen only in English, indicating a foreign
target audience, possibly media.

The video of the Israeli navy was
unrelated to the deaths, having been filmed earlier in the day and
had already released to the media and to the internet by the Israeli
army at 4:00 PM, an hour prior to the deaths.

Comment: It should be noted that not
only is the video falsified, but the beach scene clearly backs the
Israeli contention that the deaths were not caused by an Israeli
shell. Any Israeli shell would have left a giant crater and spread
sand over the entire area, as well as on the victims. There is no
crater and the beach scene is not disturbed in a way that indicates
an Israeli shell could have landed nearby.

JENIN, -: A Palestinian woman looks at a militant from the Islamic Jihad as he holds his weapon after an Israeli military incursion in the northern West Bank city of Jenin 01 June 2006. Two soldiers were injured in Jenin, one lightly and the other lightly to moderately, from an explosive charge that was detonated against an IDF jeep according to Israeli radio reports. SAIF DAHLAH/AFP/Getty Images

After explaining why he believes the gunman was hamming it up for the camera, Zoran Bozicevic, a National Post associate photo editor with combat photography experience discusses an eye-opening problem for photo editors and readers:

With the rise of digital photography, barriers to entry fell in the profession: Anyone could call himself a photojournalist, pick up a camera, and e-mail photos to editors around the world. The cost-cutting media increasingly relies on these cheap, sometimes unscrupulous, local stringers. In some cases, they flout professional objectivity, and take sides in the conflict they cover. In other cases, they stage pictures to keep employers happy. Or worse, they manipulate digital pictures after the fact, turning a photo into a work of fiction.