The Supreme Court of the United States on Wednesday said the Trump
administration is allowed to deny asylum to those who refused to seek
refuge in another country first before coming to the United States, the Associated Press reported.

Justices Sonia Sotomayer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented with the rest of their colleagues.

“Once
again the Executive Branch has issued a rule that seeks to upend
longstanding practices regarding refugees who seek shelter from
persecution,” Sotomayer wrote in her dissenting opinion, the Washington Postreported..
“Although this Nation has long kept its doors open to refugees — and
although the stakes for asylum seekers could not be higher — the
Government implemented its rule without first providing the public
notice and inviting the public input generally required by law.”

9/11 Commission top dogs say “terrorism needs to be prevented at the source,” ignore its source

By Robert Spencer Jihad Watch

“Former New Jersey Gov. Thomas H. Kean and former Congressman Lee H.
Hamilton of Indiana served as chairman and vice chairman, respectively,
of the 9/11 Commission. Over the past year, they served as the chairs of
the congressionally mandated Task Force on Extremism in Fragile States,
which was convened by the United States Institute of […]Read in browser »

Gd bless this brave soul for speaking out against the terror in Congress.

’Some people did something,’ said a freshman
congresswoman from Minnesota. Today I am here to respond to you exactly
who did what to whom. Madam, objectively speaking, we know who and what
was done. There is no uncertainty about that. Why your confusion? On
that day, 19 Islamic terrorist members of al Qaeda killed over 3,000
people and caused billions of dollars of economic damage. Is that clear?
But as to whom…I was attacked, your relatives and friends were
attacked, our constitutional freedoms were attacked and our nation’s
founding on Judeo-Christian principles were attacked. That’s what some
people did. Got that now?”

Nicholas Haros Jr, reading the names of the 9/11 victims, including
his mother, at today’s commemoration of the Twin Towers attack.

Op-ed:Two Cases...Two Verdicts Overturned...Two Reasons To Clear Our Judicial HouseBy: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio

"Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."
- Benjamin Franklin, American Founding Father

Two weeks or so ago while most of us here in Florida, me included,
were rightfully focused on a hurricane named Dorian, two Obama
appointed activist judges were busy overturning convictions of an
illegal alien and a muslim jihadi with barely a word heard in the
mainstream media. Well...that word will be now be heard...better late than never I
say.

Let's start with Jose Inez Garcia Zarate...the five times deported
illegal alien...a man now in our country illegally for time
number six...who shot and killed Kate Steinle back in 2015 when she was
leisurely strolling with her dad on San Francisco's waterfront Pier 14.
Dying in her dad's arms after being shot in the chest, the Steinle
family saw Zarate being acquitted of murder on November 30, 2017 after
the court ruled the shooting an accident. However, he was found guilty
of being a convicted felon illegally in possession of a firearm and ammunition.

An
illegal alien convicted of illegally possessing a firearm who now
thanks to his liberal miscreant lawyers and an Obama appointed liberal
activist judge named Sandra L. Margulies, has seen the knife dug deeper
into the Steinle family's back as California's First District Court of
Appeals has overturned even that conviction saying that, “the original
judge [Judge Samuel Feng] failed to instruct the jury on one of his
defenses.”

Oh really...

And so the man who stole a beautiful young woman's life...the man who
claimed that, “he unwittingly picked up the gun wrapped in a T-shirt
and it fired accidentally”...the man who claimed that after the gun went off...a gun stolen from a federal agent’s car...that he threw said gun away to
stop it from firing again...that very man is now basically not only
getting away with murder but with culpability as well, all while the Steinle
family is left to relive their grief and forever wonder why it sadly
ended this way.

But these six simple words can tell you and the Steinle family why...San
Francisco is a “sanctuary city”...a city whose police department and
government officials blatantly refuse to comply with our federal
on-the-book immigration laws...a city that allowed murdering scum like
Zarate to freely walk its streets. The rights of illegals over the
rights of American citizens is the law San Francisco now lives by, and it's
this very attitude...an attitude also embraced by California itself as
it's a “sanctuary state” ...that is the direct cause of not only Kate's
Steinle's death but the deaths of other folks in their state who've lost their lives at
the hands of illegal aliens.

Remember, if California as a whole and San Francisco in specific had
just complied with federal immigration laws, Kate Steinle and the others
murdered by illegals in California would not be dead, because Jose Inez
Garcia Zarate and the other criminal sorts like him would not have been
in these United States in the first, second...or in Zarate's case all the way up to the
sixth place.

So how did this newest travesty of justice unfold...simply on the infamous
“technicality” rouse is how. While Zarate remained in federal
prison on the
illegal possession of a firearm and ammunition charge, his court
appointed public defender, Matt Gonzales, was busy preparing his
appeal on the grounds that while deliberating the case Judge Feng, even
after being asked by the jury for added clarification about the
definition of
“possession,” did not inform the jury about what's called the “momentary
possession of a firearm,” which legally it seems is not the same as the
actual “possession” of a firearm. How so...“momentary possession” is
when an individual has “brief possession” of an “item” in question...this
being the gun...while being in the process of disposing or destroying
that “item,” and that in no way is the individual trying to prevent law
enforcement from seizing said “item.”

So with Zarate's having already fired the gun...guns don't pull their
own triggers you know...and then after it “accidentally” kills Kate
Steinle...Zarate throws the gun he knew had to be stolen into San Francisco
Bay.

And with Zarate now having already built up enough credits for
time served to cover his sentence on the state gun charge, Judge
Margulies wrote in the 3-0 decision that, “During the
deliberation, the jury asked for the definition of possession, whether
there is a time requirement of possession and whether defendant’s
possession of a firearm and knowledge he possessed it were sufficient to
demonstrate wrongful intent,” and that “it is reasonably probable
at least one juror may have reached a different conclusion if the jury
had been instructed on the momentary possession charge,” thus allowing
Kate Steinle to basically be de-facto murdered all over again.

And then to make matters even worse, Zarate's slime of an
attorney, Matt Gonzales, had the audacity to call the appeal's court
overturning the decision a “vindication”...a “vindication” because by Judge
Feng not fully instructing the jury, Gonzales felt that Feng was in effect directing a guilty
verdict be found. “He had an obligation to give this instruction
whether or not we asked for it,” said Gonzalez as he seemed to relish in
Kate Steinle's family having to relive once again the nightmare no parent should
ever have to face.

I just wonder how people like Matt Gonzalez and Judge Sandra L.
Margulies can look at themselves in the mirror let alone live with
themselves knowing that they have further hurt the innocent while
defending and overturning verdicts of those they know are guilty, and doing so on a “technicality”
alone...what should, in my opinion, be a crime in and of itself.

So
while Jose Inez Garcia Zarate remains in prison as the California
state-court ruling has no legal bearing on federal prosecution, Zarate
could still face
up to ten years in prison if found guilty of federal "possession" charges.
And yet even this, what seems like a last ditch attempt at justice,
leaves me to wonder if Kate Steinle will ever be allowed to “Rest in Peace,”
and will her
family ever reach even a modicum of closure. Honestly, I
just don't know especially when our current judicial system, and not
just in California, seems to favor the perpetrator instead of the
innocent victim.

Next on the list of Obama appointed liberal activist judges run amok
involves the case of David Daoud Wright, the former ISIS operative and fame seeker who was
found guilty of "conspiracy to commit acts of international terrorism" as
well as being one of the ringleaders of the 2015 plot to behead
political activist, blogger, and AFDI (American Freedom Defense Initiative)
founder Pamela Geller...a woman I'm honored to call my friend. And
why the focus on Pamela Geller...because she was the organizer of the
“Draw Mohammed” art contest... a contest Wright and his ilk found offensive
to mohammed and to mulsims...a contest that saw the two muslim gunmen who attacked said
contest rightfully being shot dead by Garland, Texas police.

Thankfully, their plot fell apart after Wright’s uncle, one Usamaah
Abdullah Rahim, said he wanted to kill Massachusetts police officers
instead of Geller, but as fate would have it he was shot dead by the very officers
he wanted to kill after pulling a knife on them in a parking lot when
they simply wanted to question him. David Daoud Wright was now left alone to
face charges, and in December 2017 he was found guilty on five counts in
said terrorist plot against Pamela Geller. However, we recently
witnessed one of those convictions being overturned by Federal Appeals
Court Justice David J. Barron...with his decision being ludicrous at
best, an outward catering to those out to kill us all at worst.

And why do I feel this way...because in his ruling this abomination
of an Obama appointed islamic condoning judge had the audacity to mimic
David Daoud Wright's lawyers whose sole defense was that their client, “could
have simply been ‘role playing’ with respect to following ISIS’s
direction,” against Pamela Geller. Ignoring that those on the jury in no
way felt that Wright was “role playing” when reaching their
verdict...Judge Barron also ignored that the five guilty verdicts were
reached in under six hours...remarkable time in a case like this. And
those guilty verdicts led Acting U.S. Attorney William
Weinreb to state that, “Mr. Wright is a terrorist, an ISIS supporter and
recruiter who intended to wage war against the United States by
beheading people and killing Americans”...Pamela Geller sadly included.

The main case against Wright involved his contact and financing of
American ISIS leader Zulfi Hoxha's trip to Syria to train with ISIS, and
of all things video games...video games being used as a way for someone
to both train and ultimately join ISIS. In fact, Wright himself trained
by using amongst others a video game called “Call of Duty: Advanced
Warfare” to “virtually prepare” for jihad.

Judge
Barron knew all this and yet apparently he did not take any of it into
account. And what's even worse is that both David Daoud Wright's
original 2017
conviction and sentence of 28 years in prison will now more than likely
be reduced due to Barron's overturning the ISIS related conviction. And
this is not only a miscarriage of justice, but yet another showing that
Americans
do come second to politically activist judges...in the Geller case
second not to
an illegal alien but to a convicted terrorist.

Makes
you wonder who's worse...the illegals, the terrorists, or the activist
judges who give these folks but a slap on the wrist and then basically
lets them go. Sad isn't it...sad indeed.

So what's the answer to stopping liberal appeals judges from
overturning rightful verdicts... to overturn them simply to meet their
personal political agenda alone? Remember, it's not as simple as just
replacing them with conservative justices for a defendant has the legal
right to appeal any guilty verdict or in the above stated two cases any
secondary part thereof said verdict without negating the original
underlying guilty or not guilty conviction.

In the Zarate case his attorney Matt Gonzales used “error at trial” in his appeal
to Judge Margulies, because of Judge Feng's perceived legal error of
omission regarding “possession,” an error he believed contributed to a
guilty verdict no matter this be right or wrong. In the Pamela Geller
case, there is no rhyme nor reason for the ISIS related charge to be
overturned, proving once again that liberal activist judges
tread lightly in regards to those of the islamic persuasion.

So while a number of judges...whether they be appeals court judges or otherwise...must
be replaced before the worst of the worst are coddled even more
than they already are, they must not be replaced solely based upon their
party affiliation, but based upon their judicial record of being
either Constitutional judges or activist judges. Remember, we have seen
Republican judges and even Supreme Court justices not following the
Constitution at times, albeit to a far lesser degree than Democrat
judges and justices. But no matter the judicial appointee and no matter
the president who appoints them, said judge or justice must always
interpret the law as per the Constitution not take it upon themselves to
start legislating from the bench as the two above mentioned judges clearly have
done.

It's way past time to clear America's judicial house and put it back in proper working order...and do so before it's too late.

Tomorrow, Friday, September 13th, from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political Radio,
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig
Andresen and Diane Sori discuss
'Two Cases...Two Verdicts Overturned...Two Reason To Clear Our Judicial
House'; 'Mullen, Nebraska Schools a Triggered Indoctrinator'; and important news of the day.

EMAIL FOLLOWERS

Follow My Posts by Email

The Patriot Factor

I am an American Patriot...part of the grassroots movement of bloggers spreading the truth the media will not. I am also co-host with Craig Andresen of RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS on RSP Radio at: https://streamingv2.shoutcast.com/right-side-patriots