Washington, D.C.– Natural Resources Committee Ranking Member Raúl M. Grijalva (D-Ariz.) and 88 other House Democratssent a letter todayto House and Senate Armed Services Committee leaders asking them to keep provisions attacking endangered species and public lands out of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). A conference committee began meeting this week to reconcile differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill.While the Senate bill has few anti-environment riders, the House version includes provisions that would drive the extinction of the greater-sage grouse, the lesser prairie chicken and the American burying beetle, as well as language that would withdraw millions of acres of U.S. public lands from management by responsible federal agencies.None of these riders are defense-related. Today’s letter, accessible athttp://1.usa.gov/1LjkCLw, requests that they all be rejected in the conference committee report, which could see a vote as early as this month.“This bill should be about protecting Americans from security threats, not giving away our natural resources and trashing the Endangered Species Act,”Grijalva said. “These riders are just another attempt by House Republicans to undermine sound management of U.S. public lands and drive the extinction of American wildlife one species at a time – a tactic we’ve seen many times before and one they’re obviously going to repeat. The Department of Defense did not ask for any of this language and existing resource management processes are working well. Republicans should focus on protecting the American people from the very real threats we face rather than pushing bad environmental ideology in a defense bill.”“The sage grouse rider included in the House-passed National Defense Authorization Act cedes unprecedented control over federal land to states and raised serious Constitutional concerns by limiting judicial review of projects on federal lands,”said Rep. Niki Tsongas (D-Mass.), Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Federal Lands. “I opposed these efforts then and will continue to do so as an appointee to the Conference Committee tasked with ironing out the differences between the House and Senate bills. I will be urging my colleagues to oppose the sage grouse rider, in part because it would endanger the significant efforts and progress made by a collaboration of organizations currently involved in protecting the sagebrush habitat. I look forward to working with my House and Senate colleagues to ensure we put forward the strongest bill possible – one that supports our service members and efforts to preserve the land they so honorably protect.”The letter is supported by the following conservation groups:American Bird ConservancyAmerican RiversCalifornians for Western WildernessCenter for Biological DiversityCenter for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned ScientistsClean Water ActionDefenders of WildlifeEarthjusticeEndangered Species CoalitionEnvironmental Defense FundEnvironmental Protection Information CenterFriends of the EarthGreenpeaceKlamath Forest AllianceLeague of Conservation VotersNational Audubon SocietyNatural Resources Defense CouncilRocky Mountain WildSierra ClubSouthern Utah Wilderness AllianceThe Wilderness SocietyWestern Watersheds Project

Denver, CO — A coalition of six conservation groups today moved to defend the Bureau of Land Management’s new hydraulic fracturing rules against legal challenges by the oil and gas industry and the States of Wyoming, North Dakota and Colorado. The conservation groups, represented by Earthjustice, filed motions to intervene in two lawsuits pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming.The rules, which were published March 26, will apply to more than 750 million acres of public and tribal lands across the United States, and on private lands where the minerals are federally managed (known as “split estate”). BLM’s regulations governing important aspects of oil and gas extraction, including well integrity and waste management, had not been updated since 1988 despite the increasingly widespread use of well stimulation techniques like high-volume hydraulic fracturing, which injects millions of gallons of fluids and toxic chemicals into the ground.The six groups – the Sierra Club, Earthworks, The Wilderness Society, Conservation Colorado Education Fund, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance and Western Resource Advocates, represented by Earthjustice, seek to defend the BLM rule in two lawsuits. Both cases are pending before U.S. District Court Judge Scott Skavdahl in the District of Wyoming. The first case was brought by two oil and gas industry trade associations, the Western Energy Alliance and the Independent Petroleum Association of America. The industry groups argue that BLM should leave regulation of fracking to state regulators. The second case, filed by the States of Wyoming, Colorado and North Dakota, alleges that BLM lacks the legal authority to regulate fracking on federal lands. According to media reports, the State of Utah has indicated its intention to join the states’ lawsuit. “Like other extreme attempts by states to assert authority over federal land, these legal claims are meritless,”said Earthjustice Staff Attorney Michael Freeman, who is representing the conservation groups. “Our public lands belong to all Americans. They should be managed under strong national standards that protect our water, land and wildlife — not just to benefit oil and gas companies.”Both the industry trade associations and the states have asked the Court to issue a preliminary injunction blocking the BLM rule from taking effect on June 24. The Conservation Groups, if permitted to join the lawsuit, expect to oppose those requests.The BLM rules impose several new requirements. For the first time, oil and gas companies will have to seek approval from BLM before conducting hydraulic fracturing operations on public lands. That process will allow the agency to review the proposed operation and ensure it does not jeopardize drinking water supplies or threaten other types of contamination. In addition, the use of certain waste pits at oil and gas well sites will be banned in most cases to protect wildlife, clean water and other resources. Instead, BLM generally will require oil and gas companies to use metal tanks to store these wastes. And the rule requires companies to disclose the chemicals used in fracking fluid.“We would have liked to see BLM go further with these rules, but they nevertheless are an important step in the right direction,” saidJon Goldin-DuBois, president of Western Resource Advocates. “They promise to reduce the number of chemical spills, groundwater contamination and other accidents.”

“BLM still needs to do more to improve its management of fracking on public lands,”said Deb Nardone, director of Sierra Club's Beyond Natural Gas campaign. “The new hydraulic fracturing rule represents only a first step, but we’re in this case to ensure that the federal government keeps making progress – rather than moving backward – in dealing with the threats from fracking.”

“The public needs a hydraulic fracturing rule to protect their public lands,”said Earthworks Energy Program Director Bruce Baizel.“BLM’s first ever fracking rule requires only modest steps to help protect streams and aquifers on public lands, and everything that relies on them.”

About the Salmon River Mountain Press

The Salmon River Mountain Press shares news from federal and state natural resource agencies, environmental, conservation and recreation groups in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wyoming. The blog delivers the content one news story at a time.