The Brexit Debate: In or out?

At our first Secular Market Forum of 2016 former Chancellor of the Exchequer Lord Lawson locked horns with columnist Hugo Dixon over the arguments for and against one of the biggest issues facing Europe this year: "Brexit".

15/03/2016

The government has officially recommended the UK to vote to remain in the European Union (EU) at the referendum to be held on 23 June. Despite British Prime Minister David Cameron announcing he had successfully negotiated a new settlement, several key cabinet members have publically opposed his call to stay in.

Fears about what a so-called Brexit might mean for the UK economy have been reflected in significant recent volatility in sterling. To help address questions about the potential pros and cons to the British economy of staying in, or leaving the EU, Schroders brought together two prominent proponents from each camp.

Wide-ranging debate

Lord Lawson, former Conservative Chancellor of the Exchequer, is the President of Conservatives for Britain, which is backing the cross-party "Vote Leave" campaign, of which he is also the Chairman. Meanwhile, Hugo Dixon is Chairman and Editor-in-Chief of InFacts, a journalistic enterprise making the case for Britain to stay in the 28-nation block.

In a wide-ranging debate, chaired by Schroders Chief Economist and Strategist Keith Wade, the pair touched on the key issues at the heart of the debate. Among other points, they discussed the possible implications for British trade in the event of Brexit, the impact of EU regulation on UK businesses and whether the free movement of people, as well as goods and services, was key to a properly functioning union.

Both Lord Lawson and Dixon agreed on Britain’s status as a world-leading economy, and the importance of the City of London as a global financial hub. However, their opinions diverged markedly when it came to the question of whether the country’s future goals would be best served within or outside of the bloc.

The case for leaving the EU, Lord Lawson:

Lord Lawson opened the debate by explaining that the EU is primarily a political construct, with the key goal of ever-closer union, which has failed to create any net economic benefit for its members. ‘This was always about a United States of Europe, using economic means towards a political end. The fact it is not an economic project is reflected in the fact it has brought no net benefit to the countries of Europe.’

He continued: ‘If the EU were to be economically spectacular and stunning, you might buy the idea it is worth being in it, even if you don’t share the object of the exercise,’ and chastised the ‘remain camp’ for embarking on what he described as ‘project fear’. The reason that the rival campaign has chosen this route, he added, was because it lacked an economic argument for staying in. ‘They don’t say there are great benefits from being in, since there are none’.

Reminding the packed audience of the EU’s chequered economic track record since the global financial crisis of 2007/08, he said: ‘Most countries in the world are not in the EU, and most countries in the world are doing a lot better than those in the EU.’ He stressed Britain’s outlook should be global, and as much focused on emerging markets as its continental peers.

Lawson questioned whether being outside of the bloc would damage Britain’s economy. Any additional import tariffs would ‘not be crippling’ whilst existing trade agreements between Britain and the rest of world would ‘remain in place’.

Lord Lawson stressed the importance of Britain to its EU peers, citing the German motor industry in particular, who ‘sell far more goods and services to us than we sell to them’. However, even if a Britain outside of the EU was unable to negotiate good bi-lateral trade agreements with its continental peers, it should be remembered ‘trade between the EU and outside of the EU has grown far faster than trade within the EU for the past 10 years’. He added: ‘You don’t need to be a member of the EU to do business with it – other countries do so all the time.’

The greater threat was instead a UK economy ‘hamstrung’ by excessive regulation – regulation that Britain had a poor track record of successfully resisting. ‘Small and medium-sized enterprises are the seed bed for our future prosperity. For them to be suffocated by EU red tape is not good for the economy.’

Meanwhile, proponents of a remain vote risked reducing the UK to a ‘quasi colonial state’, in their quest to stay in, without, at the same time, embracing the monetary, fiscal and political union demanded of a United States of Europe.

Lord Lawson continued: ‘We will not be part of the EU but we will be a colony of the EU, I don’t find that attractive. I find more attractive a self-governing independent democracy with a global perspective and friendly relations with the EU.’

Addressing the issue of sovereignty he insisted it ‘does mean something; self government does mean something’. This would become clear were the country voting in June to join the EU, rather than remain in it: ‘Suppose we were not in Europe and the question was should we join this enterprise which is in favour of an objective that we don’t share and is well past its sell-by date?’ He contended the answer would be unequivocal: ‘I am quite sure the British people would say “no thank you”. If we don’t want to join it now, even if there is some short-term hassle when we leave, we should leave.’

The case for remaining in the EU, Hugo Dixon:

Hugo Dixon argued that Britain would have much greater influence within the EU than outside of it.

‘Problems in the modern world cross borders, whether global warming, terrorism, Russian revanchism or the problems spilling over from Syria and North Africa. We would not have much influence on these problems in and around our neighbourhood if we quit.’

Whilst acknowledging that the union faced many challenges, he said it was better to be ‘engaged in making a better Europe’.

Warning of the potential for ‘mess, confusion and possibly chaos’ in the event of an exit, Dixon accused the Vote Leave campaign on embarking on ‘project folly’, and said there was a ‘fact-based case for Britain to stay in the EU’.

He asserted the UK had a relatively good deal from the EU, when accounting for the rebate negotiated by Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government in 1984, the money returned for farmers, scientists and regional development, and the benefit of being able to offset the bloc’s international aid spending against the UK’s own aid target. The subsidy amounted to £100 per person per annum; ‘almost exactly what Norway pays per person for access to the single market’.

Dixon criticised eurosceptics who ‘often come up with myths’ about regulation. He questioned whether the world would be safer without aspects of new EU financial regulation which have followed in the wake of the financial crisis, such as Europe’s new capital adequacy rules. ‘I don’t think we would [be safer]’.

‘Over the next decade if the EU really builds a single capital market, on the lines of what they have in America, Britain and the City will be the major beneficiary,’ said Dixon.

The former Financial Times journalist rejected the idea Britain would enjoy equally good access to the EU, whether it was in or out. Mimicking Margaret Thatcher’s famous phrase, he asserted: ‘No, No, No – it’s not just about tariff-free access. The modern world is not just about goods and tariffs, it’s about non-tariff barriers to trade in services – there are no tariffs on financial services, what matters is getting a passport to operate in other EU member states.’

He said the Vote Leave camp ‘has a duty to spell out what “out means”’. It has to spell out if it ‘really wants to have full access to the single market’ and is ‘prepared to allow free movement of people from the EU to here’. If it is not prepared to allow free-movement of people, it should explain what arrangements it will put in place ‘for Brits, who like Nigel Lawson want to live on the other side of the channel’ (Lawson lives in France).

The Vote Leave camp has to explain whether it is prepared to make a contribution to the EU budget, and whether it wants the City of London to have a passport to operate in other countries, according to Dixon. It should spell out whether it wants to co-operate with the EU on counter terrorism and serious crime.

Dixon argued that the leave campaign was failing to make clear what was at stake were Britain to vote to leave the EU: ‘If we don’t know the answers to all these things and then we still vote to leave, not only is there a big risk that the people will have been duped, there is a massive danger that there will be an almighty period of post-referendum wrangling, as the new government, as Cameron couldn’t possibly last as Prime Minister, has to figure out what on earth it is going to do.’

On the issue of sovereignty he contended: ‘There is no such thing as absolute control, to suggest otherwise is “project fantasy”, we have to work with others to achieve our interests’.

Important Information

This site is designed for Institutional Investors. We define "Institutional Investors" as Institutions with the appropriate expertise and knowledge e.g. asset managers, distributors and financial intermediaries. You should not use this site if you do not fall within this category.

SICAV FUNDS DO NOT HAVE A GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE AND PAST RETURNS DO NOT SECURE FUTURE ONES.

Schroder Investment Management (Luxembourg) S.A. is the management company (the "Management Company") of Schroder Alternative Solutions ("Schroder AS"), Schroder International Selection Fund ("Schroder ISF"), Schroder GAIA and Schroder GAIA II (each a "Company" and collectively referred to as the "Companies").

The Companies are umbrella structured open-ended investment companies organised as "société anonyme" under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and qualifies as a Société d'Investissement a Capital Variable. Schroder ISF and Schroder GAIA qualify as SICAVs under Part I of the law of 17 December 2010 regarding undertaking for collective investment. Schroder AS and Schroder GAIA II are regulated by the provisions of Part II of the law of 17 December 2010 regarding undertaking for collective investment. The Companies operate sub-funds, each having a specific portfolio of assets and liabilities within the Companies, with its own net asset (the "Funds").The Management Company is subject to the requirements of the Management Company Directive 2010/43/EC, as implemented in Luxembourg.

The Management Company only gives information on its products and services and does not provide investment advice based on individual circumstances. If you are in any doubt about whether an investment is suitable, you should seek independent advice.

Please read this disclaimer below and agree to the terms before you can access the website.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amount originally invested. Any past performance figures shown are not indicative of future performance. Exchange rate may vary and cause the value of international investments to rise or fall. The levels and reliefs from taxation may change. Tax reliefs referred to are those currently available and their value depends on the circumstances of the individual investor. Investment in emerging markets involves a high degree of risk. Investment in any Fund mentioned herein should not be made without careful reference to the relevant prospectus. The information contained in these pages does not form part of any contract, nor can you rely on it for any contractual purpose.

The information contained on this site is not an invitation to subscribe. Subscriptions will only be received and shares issued on the basis of a Fund's current prospectus and the latest audited annual report. Copies of each Fund's current prospectus and the latest audited annual report may be obtained from the Management Company or your Schroders branch office.

Disclaimer of Warranty and Limitation of Liability.

The Management Company believes that the provided information is accurate as at the date of publication but no warranty of accuracy is given and no liability in respect of any error or omission by a third party is accepted by the Management Company or its affiliates or any director or employee of the Management Company or its affiliates.

In the event of any provision of these Terms and Conditions being deemed unenforceable, the remaining terms and provisions shall be unimpaired and the unenforceable term or provision shall be replaced by an enforceable term or provision that comes closest to the intention underlying the unenforceable term or provision.

The Management Company may modify these Terms and Conditions at any time, with immediate effect and without prior notice.

Privacy

The Management Company is as concerned as you are about the privacy of any personal information you may provide to us through this site. When you visit this site, you are not required to provide us with any personal information other than your country of residence, unless you choose to do so. Our web server will not recognize your domain name or e-mail address, only your indicated country of residence.

Schroders' web sites use "cookies" for collecting user information from certain pages of the web sites. By "cookie" we mean the small text file that is stored on the hard disk of a computer by the web browser on a computer. It contains information sent by the web server of the web site that a user has visited. A cookie identifies users and can store information about them and their use of a site. Schroders uses cookies to keep track of user activity and to store a user's username and password to allow the user access to some of its protected web sites. The information derived from cookies enables Schroders to identify which areas of the web site are more interesting so that we can improve our web sites and the information we provide to users. The cookies that Schroders uses to store user name and passwords are encrypted and cannot be read. A user can choose not to accept certain cookies by turning this feature 'off' within the browser settings, however doing this may detract from 'user experience' of certain web sites or even prevent access to some of our websites.

Use of Links

This website (the "Website") may contain links to websites published by third parties. Links to this Website may also be included on third party websites. The Management Company has not reviewed any of the third party website which link to the Website or to which the Website links. It is not responsible for the content to be found directly or indirectly on any third-party website nor does it endorse or recommend the products and services presented on any such third-party website. Following links to any third-party website or pages shall be at your own risk.

The Website and the information or other material contained in it are not directed to, or intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of, or incorporated or located in any jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to local laws or regulations, or where the Management Company would infringe any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction.

Electronic Mail Function

The possibility to communicate by e-mail between you and the Management Company is only a convenience granted by the Management Company. You acknowledge the limitations on the reliability of delivery, timeliness and security of internet e-mail and understand that the Management Company will not be responsible for any loss or damage that could result from your requests not being accepted, confirmed or processed or as a result of your e-mails being intercepted by third parties. As a result of these concerns, you should not send sensitive information by e-mail, which may not be secure. If you do so, you do it at your own risk.

Intellectual Property Rights

The information and materials contained in the Website are protected by intellectual property rights, which are owned or claimed by the Management Company, its affiliated entities or third parties. The information and materials may be displayed and printed exclusively for your personal, non-commercial use, provided that you do not remove any intellectual property right or other notices therein. You agree not to transmit, reproduce or sell the information and materials contained in this Website in whatever form and by whatever means without the express prior written consent of the Management Company.

Applicable Law and Jurisdiction

Your access to, visit to and use of the Website, and the present Terms and Conditions are governed by and shall be construed in accordance with Luxembourg law. The Courts of Luxembourg shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any dispute relating thereto, without prejudice to the choice of the Management Company for having any other court jurisdiction over such a dispute under any applicable law.

MSCI Disclaimer:Source: MSCI

The information obtained from MSCI and other data providers, included in reports available from this website, may only be used for your internal use, may not be reproduced or re-disseminated in any form and may not be used to create any financial instruments or products or any indices. The MSCI information and that of other data providers is provided on an 'as is' basis and the user of this information assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. MSCI, each of its affiliates and each other person involved in or related to compiling or creating any MSCI information (collectively, the "MSCI Parties") and other data providers, expressly disclaim all warranties (including, without limitation any warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, non-infringement, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose) with respect to this information. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall any MSCI Party or other data provider have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, punitive, consequential (including, without limitation, lost profits) or any other damages.