Taser unveils multi-shot stun gun

Jul 28, 2009

A police officer demonstrates a taser gun in 2007. Manufacturers of the Taser stun gun on Monday unveiled a new handheld weapon on Monday which is capable of shocking three people without having to reload.

Manufacturers of the Taser stun gun on Monday unveiled a new handheld weapon on Monday which is capable of shocking three people without having to reload.

Arizona-based Taser International said in a statement the company's new X3 "electronic control device" was the first new handheld weapon since 2003 and featured enhanced safety details.

Taser International chief executive Rick Smith said the new multi-shot Taser would "increase officer safety through the ability to recover from a missed shot or even simultaneously stop up to three separate targets."

The company said the new weapon included a "pulse calibration system" for allowing electricity to be distributed across the outer layers of the skin of the target rather than deep into the body.

A video demonstration of YouTube showed three volunteers being floored by three successive shots before getting to their feet apparently unhurt.

The rate of sudden deaths increased six-fold in the first year that California law enforcement agencies deployed the use of stun guns, according to a UCSF study. Findings also showed a two-fold increase in the rate of firearm-related ...

A new report co-authored by Rice political scientists Mark Jones and William Reed with colleagues at the University of Houston finds patterns and/or aberrations in the use of Tasers related to ethnicity, gender, race and ...

On the eve of the British Columbia inquiry into the death of Robert Dziekanski, a review of scientific data in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) finds that in some cases, stun guns may stimulate the heart in experimental ...

Recommended for you

The idea of "digital addiction" has returned to the fore with UCL researchers suggesting physical activity should displace the compulsive watching of television, internet surfing and video gaming. Often it ...

As evidence mounts that Germanwings flight 4U9525 was crashed deliberately by its co-pilot who locked the flight's captain out of the cockpit, there have been renewed calls to enforce a "two-person rule", ...

The approval federal aviation officials gave Amazon.com last week to test a specific drone design outdoors is already outdated, the company's top policy executive said Tuesday in written testimony to a Senate subcommittee.

Special operations troops heading to war zones are asking for commercial intelligence analysis software they say will help their missions. But their requests are languishing, and they are being ordered to use a flawed, in-house ...

We climbed out over the Mediterranean after take-off from Barcelona, veered off the Spanish coast, and pointed the nose northeast. Soon we'd be talking to controllers in Marseille and make landfall near Toulon. ...

The problem isn't the tasers, they're great. It's the level of intelligence of an officer that, for instance, cries out commands to someone who was just tased, and who is basically crying "I can't!!!", and tases them again for not complying, which is something I've seen in youtube. That's what worries me. This video demonstrates clearly that the taser is non-lethal if used properly. A police baton is quite deadly if one chooses it to be. Most anything is.

acarrillho, its worse than that. Frequently officers tazer suspects 'just to be on the safe side'. Whereas before they would have approached cautiously with guns drawn, now they just tazer, then approach, long before the arrest stage (if any).

So I remembered reading about a deaf, disabled man being tasered, but when I tried to look it up I found this news blurb about a deaf man in Wichita tasered in his own bathroom while wearing nothing but a towel - the cops were there on a false alarm: http://www.kwch.c...=7446220

The original story I was thinking of was this one:http://news.yahoo..._tasered
In Mobile the police bravely tasered and pepper-sprayed a deaf, mentally-disabled man who refused to leave a store bathroom. They also left a knot on his head by whacking him with the bathroom door. The police claim their actions were justified because he had an umbrella.

The tasers should be built with an integrated digital camera, and a small audio recorder that records for a minute after the taser is used.
That way the person holding the taser knows he can be held to account if the images and sound record do not support his account of the tasing event, and the taser users will be more cautious (ideally, other weapons should be similarly equipped).

The fact they had to develop a "non-lethal" weapon when firearms can be used in non-lethal ways (leg shots/etc) with a little skill makes you wonder if cops should be allowed to carry weapons at all with thier less than adequate training.

Can't quite see what's so exciting about a 3-shot tazer tbh, a basic glock has a 17-round mag so maybe they should be aiming to beat that! :-P

The fact they had to develop a "non-lethal" weapon when firearms can be used in non-lethal ways (leg shots/etc) with a little skill makes you wonder if cops should be allowed to carry weapons at all with thier less than adequate training.

Rule No. 2 (out of 4) of Basic Firearm Safety:
Never... NEVER... point a firearm at anything you do not intend to destroy.

Firearms have never been meant for non-lethal action. If you are shooting at something, you had better intend to kill it. Egnite that was a very wrong, very dangerous and very ignorant statement. You obviously have never been trained in proper firearm use, please don't talk like you know anything about firearm skill.

4 out of 5 officers are good honest hardworking folks trying to make the world a bit safer for everyone. Its the 1 out of 5 officers who loves the sound as the perps head hits the hood as he slammed down who feels like that dirt bag could use a few licks extra for all the stuff he may have done. The problem is the 4 will cover for the 5th every time. Do you notice that in virtually every case of documented police brutality its a passer by with a camcorder or a cell phone who has the clip?? Virtually every police car these days has a camera running they use it to document issues durring prosecution. Strangelyl enough though in almost all cases of complaints of brutality ooops that tape seems to have allready be processed and erased or simply misplaced

The fact they had to develop a "non-lethal" weapon when firearms can be used in non-lethal ways (leg shots/etc) with a little skill makes you wonder if cops should be allowed to carry weapons at all with thier[sic] less than adequate training.

Wow, that's pretty ignorant.

First, defunctdiety pointed out that basic firearm training contradicts your statement. Firearms are lethal weapons and should always be handled as such.

Second, striking a leg is much more difficult than a torso. And what's behind the leg that you are almost certainly going to miss? Anything downrange is a at risk, especially if you are shooting at a narrow, fast-moving target like a leg.

Finally, less-lethal weapons like tasers are being abused, period. They may be less-lethal than firearms when each are used correctly, but they are still lethal in many cases.

acarrillho, its worse than that. Frequently officers tazer suspects 'just to be on the safe side'. Whereas before they would have approached cautiously with guns drawn, now they just tazer, then approach, long before the arrest stage (if any).

Want to put some reference up for that one? I can think of only 2 incidents when a taser was improperly used. I can think of thousands of police shootings where an officer was maimed or killed because he didn't feel comfortable drawing down a functional firearm on a suspect.

@defunctDie-ty
You are extremely right sir. I can see though the first multiply-tased malcreant to die and the relatives who sue. There are taser projectiles which can be fired from a shotgun- fully self-contained.

I generally support Taser use and pepper spray though there are a lot of problems with training and usage policies. There are instances of cops misusing guns even without firing them or cuffing people without cause to intimidate them (Professor Gates not included). There are even video's on the net of front desk officers using nothing more than threats and "authority" to intimidate citizens into not registering a complaint about police officers.

On the other hand there are a lot of violent and vicious people out there that cops have to deal with without knowing anything about them; from people on drugs and with psychotic conditions to "protesters" who want to express their political beliefs by breaking shop windows and maybe a cop's bones. I don't want to see cops prevented from taking an action that would make a possible shooting (of himself or the subject) less likely. Between false accusations against cops and real acts of police misconduct it might soon come to the point that every second of an officer's on-duty action will need to be video recorded.

BTW, why do so many people who are beating their wives and attacking people at convenience stores and swearing at cops on those reality TV shows and on the news have their shirts off? Is their something about violent people wanting people to see them shirtless or does taking off one's shirt in public make one violent?

BTW, why do so many people who are beating their wives and attacking people at convenience stores and swearing at cops on those reality TV shows and on the news have their shirts off? Is their something about violent people wanting people to see them shirtless or does taking off one's shirt in public make one violent?

Use of alcohol typically raises the surface body temperature making the user feel extraordinarily warm.

BTW, why do so many people who are beating their wives and attacking people at convenience stores and swearing at cops on those reality TV shows and on the news have their shirts off? Is their something about violent people wanting people to see them shirtless or does taking off one's shirt in public make one violent?

Use of alcohol typically raises the surface body temperature making the user feel extraordinarily warm.

The increased blood flow to the skin actually causes sweating and heat loss. I think it's a "warrior thing", where you remove the "armor illusion" provided by clothing. I suppose this comes naturally sometimes.