Hold Congress Accountable

About FreedomConnector

Find activists, groups, and events right in your own neighborhood. Join FreedomConnector to get involved and learn more about key issues threatening our economic freedom. Whether you’re looking for like-minded people, trying to boost your existing group’s impact, or simply trying to stay up on current events, FreedomConnector is the place to start. See what’s happening in your state today!

Search FreedomWorks

Resources

Blog

Dr. Phil Roe Describes All Of The Above Approach To Fighting Obamacare

Dr. Phil Roe (R-TN) is the Co-Chair of the GOP Doctors Caucus in the House of Representatives. In an interview on Friday, he described the strategy behind the vote to defund Obamacare, the negative effects that Obamacare is having across the nation, and the status of the defunding coalition in the House and Senate. A second article will discuss Roe's new bill, HR 3121, that is a market based alternative to Obamacare.

Dr. Roe says that he's introduced the term 'herd immunity' several times with House leadership, in an attempt to get the coalition to stay together: "In medicine, when discussing infectious disease, if everyone in the herd is immunized, nobody gets sick. When individuals go without, they can get sick and spread disease among the herd. Republicans can learn from this - when we stick together, we're stronger. The American people want leadership from somebody, and they haven't been getting it." Roe was adamant that this vote was good for the nation, and that America was looking to House Republicans to show real leadership on the issue.

Roe believes that every Republican on the Hill is dedicated to getting rid of Obamacare, but they may differ on the strategy to achieve this goal. When asked about Senator Cruz's statements late last week and whether they hindered the momentum to defund, Roe said, "I haven't spoken with him since the report, but I think he's probably had a re-think. We have sent the ball over to their court now. The House has done its job. I won't give us kudos though, because there's a lot of work to do. Next week's votes are gonna be a lot tougher", once they know what bill is returned to them after a vote in the Senate.

However, Roe is dedicated to this effort, citing several examples of clinics that are cutting jobs, contrary to expectations, due to Obamacare. "In my state, one large clinic is laying off 1,000 people and cutting its budget by $250 million. Cleveland Clinic recently announced that it is cutting 3,000 workers. And Lee County, Virginia, just over the state line from my district, is closing its county hospital due to Obamacare - and they'll never get another hospital again."

Some pundits on the Right have said that the defunding effort is bad strategy, stating that there's no end game and no pathway to success, as it appears unlikely that the bill will emerge intact from the Democrat-controlled Senate. "I don't disagree with that," said Roe, "but that's the hand we've been dealt. A delay might be better. But I absolutely believe that this is good for the country." Roe expressed strong support for an all-of-the-above strategy to attack Obamacare on every front possible, under the belief that allowing it to be implemented as-is will be disastrous.

Roe was quick to dismiss worries that the Republicans would get blamed for a government shutdown. "I wasn't elected to close the government down - our job is to run the government." He blamed Democrats for not passing a budget in his 5 years in Congress, reminding us that "the CR [continuing resolution] is a terrible way to run the government." Roe went back to 1978 and found that there had been 17 previous government shutdowns - "six under Reagan! I didn't even know there were any!" - and found that in each instance, there were sufficient appropriations bills passed that the government really wasn't shut down. But he's preparing for a fight this time. "I am absolutely adamant that we get our soldiers paid and that we do our job." Again, he reminds us, it's a matter of the GOP sticking together and effectively communicating who is to blame for any shutdown. After all, the House voted to fund the entire government, excluding Obamacare. Any refusal to pass the bill in the Senate will be the fault of Democratic leadership in that chamber.

my classmate's step-sister makes $74 every hour on the laptop. She has been without work for 6 months but last month her paycheck was $20967 just working on the laptop for a few hours. useful reference JOBS70.ℂOM

The White House is trying to downplay yet another ObamaCare scandal by calling Jonathan Gruber, the architect of the law, a liar. In a statement provided to a leftist blog, a White House spokesperson disputed the MIT economist's October 2013 comment that the designed lack of transparency in ObamaCare was "a huge political advantage" to ram it through Congress.

Another video has surfaced in which Jonathan Gruber insults voters. This time, however, the MIT economist and ObamaCare architect refrained from calling Americans "stupid," though there isn't much of a difference from what he said in previous comments (covered here and here).

Jonathan Gruber, the MIT economist who helped the Obama administration craft ObamaCare, is trying to downplay his comments at a October 2013 panel discussion, during which he bragged about the designed "lack of transparency" in the Affordable Care Act and the "stupidity of the American voter."

The Department of Health and Human Services expects ObamaCare enrollments through the federal and state exchanges to come in between 9 million and 9.9 million by the end of 2015, according to CNBC, far lower than the most recent estimate released by the Congressional Budget Office in April of this year:

More than a year after the Obama administration launched the federal ObamaCare exchange, HealthCare.gov, is still giving health insurance companies problems. Though the second open enrollment period is just days away from launching, backend systems that are supposed to communicate with insurers aren't yet finished, according to Politico:

ObamaCare is, once again, headed to the nation's highest court. The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments over an IRS rule that granted tax credit subsidies to states that opted not to create an ObamaCare exchange. By granting review, the Supreme Court is going against the wishes of the Obama administration, which had argued that the case, King v. Burwell, should work its way through lower courts:

A majority of HealthCare.gov and state-based exchange users say they don't plan to use the ObamaCare exchanges when the second open enrollment period begins on November 15, according to a survey conducted by BankRate.com. Experts surmise that many consumers who bought health plans on the exchanges will auto-renew, which could mean they'll end up paying more for coverage.

In September 2009, during an interview with a local Fox affiliate, Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO) told Coloradans that "[i]f you have an insurance policy you like, doctor or medical facility that provides medical services to you, you'll be able to keep that doctor or that insurance policy." There was no ambiguity in his statement, just the same line that was repeated by President Obama and other Senate Democrats to help sell ObamaCare to a skeptical public.

Young people who have, under the threat of a punitive tax, purchased health insurance coverage on the individual market have seen their premiums skyrocket under ObamaCare. While premiums have increased substantially for everyone, a new study shows that millennials have seen larger increases than their older counterparts:

The effects of the Affordable Care Act have been so unpleasant that it is becoming increasingly hard even to find Democrats willing to praise the law. So far, ObamaCare has done pretty much the exact opposite of everything its architects promised. But it would be naive to expect Democrats to admit their mistake outright. Instead of acknowledging the increasingly difficult to deny truth that ObamaCare is a disaster that needs to be uprooted in its entirety, the go-to talking point has become that the law just needs to be “fixed.” With the right legislative patches, they argue, we can transform this lumbering behemoth into something that can actually function.