I'm watching on delay. Opinion that 70% who voted leave did so on one of two issues: immigration or a notion of reclaiming sovereignty (which has an emotional element as well as a factual one). Economic doom and gloom didn't cut it - Clegg says that even he almost felt like voting out listening to Osbourne's threats of a punishment budget and taking money off every household.

Creasey talking about freedom of labour (distinctly not freedom of movement). That may satisfy many leavers' demands - especially of those who vote Labour and fear immigration because of any perceived affect on pay and jobs.

UK nationals living abroad are worried. Any arrangement has to be reciprocal else we risk UK nationals living in the EU losing all their rights in future negotiations. If we said it needn't be reciprocal then we would be failing to protect those people from what the EU might chose to impose on them in driving a hard bargain with us over Brexit.But that's not say that both sides ought to agree on protecting rights of everyone sooner rather than later. It isn't fair for either UK or EU nationals living in another EU country to spend the next 2.5 years worried about their lives.

Maybe our kids won't be sent to die for the EU's empire building, what was that about Potugals colonial past, handy for dealing with Africa. Again, I don't want my kids to be cannon fodder for any meglomaniac in Brussels.

They said the studio audience were mainly remain because it was a first come, first served ticketed event held in London and that's how the numbers worked out. I have no idea why the political guests weren't more evenly split though.

Again, I don't want my kids to be cannon fodder for any meglomaniac in Brussels.

But our children have already been cannon fodder for megalomaniacs in Washington. Does the fact that the person who sent them into war, Bush, backed up by Blair, spoke English, make the pain any less for the bereaved relatives?As Reg Keys said, after the Chilcot report was published: 'My son died in vain'.