birddseedd - August 28, 2014, 4:29 pm

If you were truly part of the thinking class, you wouldn't vote for either.

marms - October 23, 2012, 7:44 am

GrouchoMarxist - September 15, 2012, 8:29 am

I bet your mother wonders what you do in the basement to get all these royality checks..

marms - September 15, 2012, 8:26 am

This poster is doing great! Still number 1 on the Politifake "The h** List" 10 days after creating it ... Thanks for the support :)

GrouchoMarxist - September 7, 2012, 7:41 pm

Click the viral b***on on the left... Let us know when you find one of yours..

GrouchoMarxist - September 7, 2012, 7:28 pm

Only that many idiots on the web site?

marms - September 7, 2012, 9:47 am

I found this poster posted on "I will vote for Obama in 2012". It was shared 4,482 time in a 24 hour period http://www.facebook.com/james.dieterich#!/pages/I-will-vote-for-Obama-in-2012/109880029049898

JGalt - September 5, 2012, 11:31 pm

Actually the fact-checkers give "pants on fire" only to liberals and hardly ever for the most egregious liberal lies- which shows there is a double-standard...

GrouchoMarxist - September 5, 2012, 6:53 pm

Did Fauxnews just say that?

fauxnews - September 5, 2012, 5:09 pm

I did. A liberal website. Glad to know where you get your info. Also the same website has a great piece about Ryan and Romney's RNC lie. So far they are leading with more lies and no bounce from RNC. Thanks for the link.

GrouchoMarxist - September 5, 2012, 12:13 pm

You should check the link before you act so uniformed... VIRAL SMACKDOWN

marms - September 5, 2012, 12:06 pm

You too should check your facts first. Fact: Almost every media outlet around the world fact-checked what was said at the NRC, & they all came up with the same conclusion. Many lies & half truths. It's not a smart thing to do when the world is watching.

URINALYSIS - Shouldn't you have to pass a urine test to collect a welfare check, since I have to pass one to earn it for them???

terroraustralis - October 26, 2012, 5:33 am

if marijuana was legal, then it would be illegal to fire someone for having it in their system. someone would have to have levels high enough to prove they are intoxicated, because having a trace of it in your system doesnt affect safety or work at all.

terroraustralis - October 26, 2012, 5:32 am

the f***ed up thing about it is that speed and other drugs pass out of the system within 12 hours. marijuana stays in long after the user has sobered up. drug testing is just discrimination against people who choose pot in favour of harder drugs.

terroraustralis - October 26, 2012, 5:32 am

the f***ed up thing about it is that speed and other drugs pass out of the system within 12 hours. marijuana stays in long after the user has sobered up. drug testing is just discrimination against people who choose pot in favour of harder drugs.

terroraustralis - October 26, 2012, 5:31 am

the reason you have to do a urine test to go to work, but welfare recipients dont, is because the government cares more about your privacy and freedom than your employer does. its why the government has a constitution and your employer doesnt.

JGalt - September 15, 2012, 10:44 pm

Heck, politicians should be drug tested after every vote too! lol

JGalt - September 15, 2012, 10:43 pm

agreed. Many companies have a policy to test for drugs/alcohol with any accident. I'd say make it mandatory for any police shooting or beating/violence...

SethMythrax - September 15, 2012, 10:38 pm

I think any law enforcement officers should be tested regularily because I know of a few cops that are coke heads 7 the last thing I want is a cop that is drugged up aiming a gun at me.....

MORE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS THAN SOLDIERS VOTED -

DEMOCRAT ATTACK ADS -

Cyberhagen - September 23, 2012, 12:21 pm

You're applying typical American family values to a Saudi family. The Bin Ladens don't care about Osama; he was already exiled from SA and blackballed from the family.
It took so long to get OBL because Pakistan was sheltering him.

fauxnews - September 12, 2012, 2:02 pm

Hey, bro, tone it down a little. Foxrecon is actually a pretty decent guy. All Americans here, after all. We should keep the quarrels to the posters themselves, not the messageboards, etc. Nothing derogatory about this poster, just his opinion. Peace

starryeyedguy - September 12, 2012, 12:59 pm

George Bush's strategy? LOLOL Seriously? My god, you republicans are something else! Comedy. Georgie boy had 7+ years to get Bin Laden and didn't because of his love affair w/the Saudi Royals. Barack finished him off in his first term. Accept it.

DEPORT? REALLY? - If you do that, who's going to pay for all the welfare?

romneyisatool - September 25, 2012, 10:13 pm

Fair enough.HAHA... You don't seem like a bad guy. Just funning around. Nothing personal. Good luck this November. And I mean that. Take care! God Bless.

jaxx - September 25, 2012, 10:11 pm

We will never agree on anything, except that I'm not a good speller and you are a freaking liberal genius....LOL

romneyisatool - September 25, 2012, 9:40 pm

Oh, if you felt that way you'd be sick of conservatards nitpicking over Obama's birth certificate. Your party is the KING of wasting time on things that don't matter (Swiftboating,g** marriage, etc.). So no one is buying it. Least of all you.

romneyisatool - September 25, 2012, 9:37 pm

Look, if I hurt your feelings, sorry. But doing the typical "ALL LIBERALS ARE A-HOLE" things opens you up to this kind of attack. And if mistakes really matter to you, then Romney's campaign must really be getting you down,a lifetime's worth in a week.LOL

jaxx - September 25, 2012, 9:19 pm

Oh, I forgot, THANK YOU for the correction so all of your liberal A-HOLE buddies can understand what I was saying...LOL

jaxx - September 25, 2012, 9:18 pm

AND, it's just like a liberal to jump on the things that really don't matter.

jaxx - September 25, 2012, 9:17 pm

Hey, A-HOLE if not spelling something is so bad, why don't you think about the road to hell your "Precious Leader" is taking you down. Spelling errors are NOTHING compared to the errors your leader has made.

democrat politicians -

Curlyrocks - March 8, 2016, 2:32 pm

It's still cheaper and easier to ship and process oil from the middle east than to extract our own. They just have a higher quality crude that's easier to crack.

11BangBang - March 7, 2016, 9:31 pm

You are exactly right. The poster should have read "The Most Important Part of North America" LOL! (This is sarcasm) No worries, Brett Hartland!

Mooooooooooooooooooo - March 7, 2016, 9:24 pm

I love how some Americans see "North America" as a simple 48 states with a very straight and tidy geographical line across the top. Almost like the rest of it doesn't exist. (This isn't sarcasm, keep looking at it that way.) Thanks, Murica!

the ones that earned it get 14k per year. the ones that demand it, apparently dont like black presidents...

I'LL SEE YOUR JIHAD - and raise you a Crusade.

Renza - October 2, 2013, 8:29 pm

Depending on the topic yes it has, I'd argue that it's often the result of those who broke away from religion though, or at least ceased making it their primary focus. Though western civ has been killing itself forever as well. so, it's a bit too general

Scramblus - October 2, 2013, 3:28 pm

Western civilization has been something of a success overall I think.

Renza - October 1, 2013, 11:50 pm

To be fair, historically speaking, just about everything a**ociated with Christanity can be considered a failure one way or another.

Scramblus - October 1, 2013, 1:06 am

Ah yes although admittedly since it's initial aim was to liberate Jerusalem, it could also be consider the most spectacular of failures.

Curlyrocks - September 30, 2013, 6:13 pm

Not all of them, there was that one when they didn't even make it to Jerusalem and attacked Constantinople instead. Not sure who won but since it was Christian on Christian i am certain the Christians won.

VOTING REPUBLICAN - One way or another, it's all about ruining lives.

JGalt - December 27, 2013, 11:19 pm

when you realize both sides suck, you'll have taken a major step in recognizing what needs to be fixed with this country.

rockfan5 - February 3, 2013, 10:04 am

Also sadly, if you tax corporations, they can just go back and raise prices on you. So either way you dont win.

realogic - December 5, 2012, 7:59 pm

This is sadly quite true. Corporations own everything and it's done thru extensive lobbying. It's a fact of life and the only reason corporations hate Obama was because he was going to tax them. Instead as usual everyone else pays. Status-quo guys.

TOLERANT LIBERALS - They will let you believe whatever..... Unless you disagree with them

OBAMA THE ANTICHRIST - "OH NO! THE COMMIE-SOCIALSIT NIGHTMARE HAS COME! QUICK, EVERYONE! RUN TO CANADA"

jsorocki - November 8, 2012, 9:58 am

I find your lack of creativity suspicious. Also, the spelling of your name.

Cannabal - November 7, 2012, 6:01 pm

I find your lack of coffee in the morning suspicious.

crankyhead - November 7, 2012, 5:26 pm

...only to have to turn around and go back to the trailer park in Tennesee, or whatever.

crankyhead - November 7, 2012, 5:26 pm

Well once they get here, we're going to have to explain to them that we already have a succesful socialized healthcare system, and we allow g** marriage, and all that stuff they hate. I just don't want them wasting all that gas money coming here...

Bull - November 7, 2012, 1:49 pm

I find your grasp of sarcasm lacking.

jsorocki - November 7, 2012, 8:35 am

I find your lack of intelligence appalling.

romneyisatool - November 7, 2012, 12:54 am

They are cleaning up the remains on the sidewalk outside his two story bedroom window... funny, though, not much brain matter to clean up

Cannabal - November 7, 2012, 12:50 am

Simultaneous aneurysms? If so, why the hell wasn't Battaile affected? Oh, and Crankyhead: my condolences, them Teabaggers will take a while to realize their mistake, but who knows: they might be able to find Canada anyway.

romneyisatool - November 7, 2012, 12:43 am

Notice, Cranky, how much quieter and cleaner it is in here after an Obama victory? WTFO, arnnatz, groucho, Vbunchalies, Jdolt.... we hardly knew ya? hahaha

crankyhead - November 7, 2012, 12:34 am

Please don't.

CONGRESS - Must be great to be able to vote on your own salary and tax rate.

antigun -

Renza - May 3, 2013, 8:42 am

Side note, I like how only the first two S in a**assination are blocked. whats ^ with that

Renza - May 3, 2013, 8:41 am

Can't say I know a whole lot about JFK other than his a**assination is tied to conspiracy theories. the modern extreme > and < today though are nuts, they use O logic to justify the bills they > that really just bring v this country.

JGalt - May 3, 2013, 8:27 am

If u compare a < from 1960 like JFK, he would be labelled extreme > today, which goes to show that the < has gone way to far to the

Renza - May 3, 2013, 8:24 am

decisions shouldn't be < ^ to the crazies, they will always let us v, which the > often seem to be.

JGalt - May 3, 2013, 8:18 am

left, that is

Renza - May 3, 2013, 7:36 am

>wingers tend to be crazy

Renza - May 3, 2013, 7:35 am

^it's true because its fun

JGalt - May 3, 2013, 12:24 am

^^OTC is right

Renza - May 2, 2013, 6:07 pm

^see

OTC - May 2, 2013, 4:19 pm

And renza's comment comes right after "Liberals fail at logic", right on cue.

Renza - May 2, 2013, 7:50 am

This is why conservatives typically respond with random topic-changing gibberish based in fiction?

JGalt - May 1, 2013, 11:14 pm

Liberals fail at logic, they are driven by hate and emotion so your point is moot

Renza - May 1, 2013, 8:04 am

The irony of that statement is impressive - Stating that another group is misunderstanding the argument that you have put forth based on misunderstanding their argument... is that win or fail?

Roderick Scott Neighborhod Watchman -

GrouchoMarxist - June 3, 2014, 7:47 pm

Did the stand your ground troll see this yet?

EmmaRoydes - May 18, 2014, 1:18 pm

Not to be a jerk or anything, but you are incorrect. You can find plenty of examples of the use of non-complex even via google (https://www.google.com/search?q=non-complex&oq=non-complex)

crankyhead - May 18, 2014, 1:03 pm

Emma, one does not say 'non-complex', one says 'simple'. For example: "Speaking English is simple."

fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 3:24 pm

http://www.politifake.org/comments/59376 Come on! You know you want. Good times. :-D

fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 3:23 pm

Uh, huh…sure, herpa derp or what ever you say…
Anyways, the rest of us are having fun on the “liberal party poster thread.” :-) If you want to blow off steam, come join the fun, and play! See you there hopefully. Cheers

fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 3:22 pm

/correction...or = of

fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 3:20 pm

Nah, this time around I rather enjoy you just the way you are. Like your own little prison or wackiness.

fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 3:19 pm

Well....apparently not the first two times around, huh? X-D

EmmaRoydes - May 16, 2014, 3:08 pm

might understand where I'm coming from. Of course, it could also be indicative of an onset of alzheimers, but I didn't want to go there.

EmmaRoydes - May 16, 2014, 3:06 pm

and my last point is that I was truly interested in whether or not cranky had been diagnosed yet. If he can't comprehend non-complex statements, it could be an indication of aphasia or agnosia. If you took the time to look at the comment before mine, you

EmmaRoydes - May 16, 2014, 3:00 pm

"generous" lmao, you attacked me, but your attacks were pretty lame. I know you meant to coerce me into saying something that would get me banned, but I may be dumb in your eyes, but I'm not stupid and saw thru you right off the bat.

EmmaRoydes - May 16, 2014, 2:56 pm

From what I saw, the two of you both played the spit, s******, tissue? game. Fortunately for you, moooo went after groucho, not you. But as moooooo stated, I don't know all the details, just what I saw.

fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 1:10 pm

/correction(typo)-I'm pretty fair to everyone here. I've been more than fair with you, very generous in fact...

fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 1:08 pm

hEmmaroydes often are...

fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 1:07 pm

...And I wasn't being rhetorical. Sorry if it came off as a lecture. I was actually seriously asking you that question. I'm very curious why you are SO on the attack with Cranky...seriously. Did he kill your dog or something? Jeeezz...

fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 1:06 pm

Nah, I'll speak when I want to thanx. :-) And your grudge against "Cranky" is unfounded. Groucho, as already know, used to play the "s'pit" and "s'wallow" game. So, I could care less about his feelings. I'm pretty fair to everyone here.More than fair to u

crankyhead - May 16, 2014, 12:48 pm

She sure is sensitive, huh?

EmmaRoydes - May 16, 2014, 12:48 pm

And you came after me as well, so hold your lectures until you can do them from a non hypocritical stance

EmmaRoydes - May 16, 2014, 12:46 pm

That coming from the king of attack comments!? Really fauxnews? Really!? I've seen you bare your teeth at a large number of people on this site. And now you lecture me? Lmao
In fact I very recently saw you go after grouchomarxist.

fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 12:05 pm

Do you just wait by the computer all day with unabated breath,waiting for that moment you can attack "Cranky"? What did he do to you again to earn such angry disdain and vengeance?lol..just because he happens to be liberal and proud of it, that's a crime?

crankyhead - May 16, 2014, 12:00 pm

Oh, she's going to pretend to be a doctor today, awesome.

EmmaRoydes - May 16, 2014, 11:55 am

How cute, have you already been diagnosed with either aphasia or agnosia?

crankyhead - May 16, 2014, 11:35 am

Groucho thinks he's liberal... how adorable.

GrouchoMarxist - May 16, 2014, 8:34 am

Everything I know about civil I learned from liberals..

rebeccaolsen - April 20, 2014, 11:00 pm

Ignore him. Don't feed the troll. Groucho is the poster child of uncivil around here.

steve1961 - April 20, 2014, 10:55 pm

I'd hardly say that calling them racists is civil.

GrouchoMarxist - April 20, 2014, 9:47 pm

For some strange reason libs get really pissed when you're more civil than they are..

fauxnews - April 20, 2014, 3:34 pm

Oh,dont worry"Emma"(lol)...we are ALL "friends" here X-D Now,excuse me.Gotta go back to my lovely Easter lunch.Gotta sauté this squash in front of me.Looks like you're already stirring the pot.Guess we're all cooking here!Enjoy this beautiful day.Cheers

foxrecon19d - April 20, 2014, 3:08 pm

Duh...RAMA! Getting back to the poster, I didn't know Roderick Scott sh** a 17 year old white kid. Maybe that's why he changed his name to Dave Chappelle...

steve1961 - April 20, 2014, 3:06 pm

There's a lot about the goings on at this site that I don't understand but if anybody can clean it up, it'd be you, Moo+.

Mooooooooooooooooooo - April 20, 2014, 2:03 pm

You'd have to know the whole backstory to understand and I don't think anyone that's been around here a while would accuse me of "leaning toward Faux". Quite the opposite in fact.

EmmaRoydes - April 20, 2014, 1:07 pm

from the looks of the postings, moooooooooooo, it looks like they are both just a guilty. Little lean towards faux here?

Mooooooooooooooooooo - April 20, 2014, 9:27 am

Faux. Don't take the bait, that just makes it harder for the mods.

Mooooooooooooooooooo - April 20, 2014, 9:18 am

Groucho. Lay off the name calling and the "choking" references. You're not going to get away with messing this place up again.

fauxnews - April 19, 2014, 10:37 pm

*yawn* Keep talking.I always yawn when I'm interested. Here's a fun idea: Let's play horse! I'll be the front end and you just be yourself...

GrouchoMarxist - April 19, 2014, 9:53 pm

In other words anything you post or say here is worth as pile of warm crap.. Don't choke on it loser. Thanks for playing.

fauxnews - February 27, 2014, 12:51 am

Really? Explain to me how that's possible as I'm not from America?DOH! But it sure was fun helping my American friends dissuade conservative voters into staying home and not voting for Mitt.How do you like dem apples?X-D Here,lemme give you another tissue

GrouchoMarxist - February 27, 2014, 12:37 am

An idiot you voted for...
Keep up the vacuum

fauxnews - February 26, 2014, 10:48 pm

Oh, about as well as Romney's campaign did. X-D Remind me who won the American Presidential election again? Another box of tissues, mate?

GrouchoMarxist - February 26, 2014, 10:26 pm

How's the Ron Paul campaign these days?
Who?

fauxnews - February 24, 2014, 8:04 pm

Boo hoo.Did I hurt your feelings?Still b-urthurt over your last ban?It was only a year long sentence X-D Im sure you enjoy being back.But you're probably not enjoying it as much as I am- watching you lick your wounds.It's VERY satisfying. You're a fun toy

GrouchoMarxist - February 24, 2014, 7:21 pm

fauxnews - February 24, 2014, 10:06 am

Oh, you were asking me? Eww, gross. I think you have me confused with your mother again. You mean to tell me...you did all that for nothing?!?! Tsk! Tsk! Forget to take your meds again? :-/ Forget the tissue. Here...have the whole box! You'll need it. X-D

fauxnews - February 24, 2014, 9:40 am

You dont need to ask me for permission.Do the first.But if you wanna do both,go for it.Only thing I recommend is you get kneepads next time.Those bruises look terrible.And again,TISSUE? You're face is a mess.Wipe it.Or next time,the answer will be NO.X-D

DIPLOMACY - Ironic that Republicans once dealt with a man who would later be likened to Hitler as justification for war.

realogic - February 9, 2013, 10:56 am

Odd how conservatives forgot how they armed Iran in the firt place. So you armed Iran then armed Iraq. Is there a pattern emerging here or is it just me?

GrouchoMarxist - September 16, 2012, 6:31 am

Odd how libs forget the other side was Iran......

WTFO - September 16, 2012, 12:53 am

Typo: 'denied' (didn't delete the y)

WTFO - September 16, 2012, 12:52 am

Nobody denyied that the US supported Saddam in his fight with Iran (at the time a bigger threat). Sometimes you have to support the lesser of 2 evils. At the time, there wasn't a way to know how dangerous Saddam would become. Ms. Cleo wasn't on the staff.

SethMythrax - September 16, 2012, 12:38 am

http://www.iranchamber.com/history/articles/arming_iraq.php
Sorry, I guess I ran out of room...

SethMythrax - September 16, 2012, 12:37 am

after this meeting America started to supply Saddam with WMD's & the machinery to make them. Thats why they knew Iraq had them & were persistent on attacking.They thought they were there.
http://www.iranchamber.com/history/articles/arming_iraq.ph

falconfan00 - September 3, 2012, 10:46 pm

How many times did Saddam break the UN peace agreement post-Desert Storm that required him to allow WMD inspectors into Iraq? Or did you even know that it happened? I'll give you a hint - it's in double digits.

Trump's Racist Quotes -

GrouchoMarxists - November 17, 2017, 8:37 pm

Usually left wing dribble.. Learn something.

twiddleedeee - August 19, 2016, 11:23 pm

Trump isn't racist. That Muslim Obama and lesbo Hillary are racist. Who are you going to trust with their gut to protect us from the filthy ragheads? The founders of ISIS, or an outsider with brass balls who says it like it is? Trump/Pence 2016!!!!

" THIS PRESIDENT HAS BROUGHT US OUT OF THE DARK AND INTO THE LIGHT " - Hmmmmm......I thought it was General Electric?

calron - June 7, 2015, 2:43 pm

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 9:07 pm

Bottom line on Obama, he blamed it on a youtube video for a long time. He did it in front of the UN, he did it repeatedly on TV, he did it on Univision. He contradicts his own argument that he was forthcoming with Americans from the beginning.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 9:05 pm

All sarcasm aside, I did enjoy your Churchill comments. Great stuff. I just can't reconcile that an attack on an Embassy on Sept. 11 would trigger any other first reaction otehr than a terrorist attack.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 9:02 pm

To make your story work you have a very complicated story to cover an a**ault on an American Embassy on September 11 of all days. Logic dictates you a**ume it's a terror attack first,not the other way around. That's why it just doesn't work.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 8:59 pm

I won't argue its a war worth winning. My problem is this huge leap your making based on something as patently obvious as this being a terror attack and the a**umed leap to protect an unknown a**et.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 5:22 pm

...secret Nazi memos, helped defeat Nazism. Did that suck the hind teat for the fine citizens of Coventry? Of course it did, but it helped win the war. The war on terror is a war, my friend. One that is worth winning.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 5:20 pm

Look, my point is this: Churchill allowed the Nazis to bomb Coventry, in order to protect a bigger secret. That secret being, the Allies had cracked the enigma machine, and could eavesdrop on Nazi secret communications. That the Allies could read...

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 5:09 pm

If you don't know how easy it is to blow a spies cover, and just how detrimental that is to foreign policy, especially in an environment like Libya, just ask Scooter Libby and Karl Rove.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 5:07 pm

Now from the other angle: Obama's pissed that someone attacked an embassy. He goes out to talk to the cameras, maybe says a little too much. To protect their a**et, the administration has to back pedal for weeks. You see where I'm going?

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 5:05 pm

...of course, you have a guy on the inside?

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 5:05 pm

... a spur of the moment mob uprising. Bear in mind, the designers are the bad guys. Still with me? Ok, so even if you are the POTUS, how is it possible that you know, as much as you know ("act of terror"), in such a small amount of time, unless...

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 5:04 pm

So, as far as it taking two weeks to be recognized as an act of terror, well, that point is patently false. Secondly, Sept 12th, is around 24 hours after the event happened. This was a coordinated attack on a US embassy, designed to look like...

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 5:02 pm

A couple of things, so please, bear with me. First off, it states that on the 12th of September, standing in the rose garden, Obama called it an "act of terror". It also says that he used the same phrase, later that day, at a fundraiser in Las Vegas.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 4:58 pm

Whoops. Ok, ya got me there. Sorry. But anyway that's the link, and as credible i think as they come. Give it an honest read and tell me what you think.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 4:56 pm

I didn't tell you to do that. That was either Renza, or Papa. Not too observant when it comes to the pertinent details, are you? No worries bro, it happens.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 4:54 pm

I'll save you a little more trouble: Sept 12, day after the attack, Obama called it an act of terror. You've heard the term 'fog of war', falcon?

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 4:53 pm

I already did dude. It's http://www.factcheck.org/2012/10/benghazi-timeline/. The one you told me to "check again for comprehension."

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 4:52 pm

You could always just share your link. Save you the time of having to copy/paste it.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 4:28 pm

... about the case that were rooted in the truth? Not just some quasi-true, politically charged hyperbole, designed solely to try to gain points with the voting public, weeks before an election?

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 4:26 pm

There are many reasons why you or any other member of the public shouldn't know the truth, until the certainty of said truth is absolute. Perhaps if your security clearance level was higher, you'd know the truth, or at least you'd know more details...

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 4:24 pm

I'm saying it's a possibility. There are many other possibilities. Not excluding someones willingness to parrot right wing blogosphere talking points, and then back pedal when confronted with the facts. Namely: Obama called it an act of terror day 1.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 4:17 pm

To clarify: Obama called it terror on day one, then spent weeks NOT calling it terror. Congress knew on day 3 it was terror, but couldn't tell because of a CIA ghost who'd die if we acknowledged what the whole world already knew. Makes perfect sense.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 2:27 pm

Speaking of math: Obama actually referred to it as an act of terror, on day one. Bro. Speaking of crazy theories: Would you like any more holes poked in yours? Bro?

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 2:26 pm

No, I'm saying that it isn't in the interests of national security, to disseminate the facts, until they come to light. Otherwise, you risk jeopardizing your investigation, which coincidentally, isn't over yet. Bro.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 2:24 pm

You brought up youtube, I only clarified your comment with the facts. Bro.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 1:06 pm

So.. you're arguing that the reason he couldn't tell us the truth about something blatantly obvious was to cover some spook CIA operative who... what? Leaked that it was a terrorist attack? Haha, why would anyone have to LEAK the obvious? Whatever.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 1:03 pm

Your youtube comment is nonsensical. It seems your argument is that if youtube HAD existed, then Bush would have...I dunno, blamed something on it too? You'll have to clarify that one.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 12:59 pm

The truth is plain. The facts were known in Government on the 14th, and Obama lied for weeks preceding the election. But you can't seem to do the math. You're talking crazy tangent spook theories at this point. Just own it bro.

Renza - February 20, 2013, 12:29 pm

That's right, he just said god told him to go to war. much more credible of a response.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 12:06 pm

Well, seeing as how youtube didn't exist until 2005, and wasn't really all that popular until 2007, there's a decent explanation for that, no?

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 12:04 pm

Really? You think it's weak that the CIA would try to infiltrate Ansar Al-Sharia? Good thing you're not in charge, I guess.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 9:57 am

CIA Operative? That's weak dude. Try again.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 9:56 am

I think there's a very definitive difference between suicide bombers and an 8 hour a**ault on an ambassadors compound. That, and Bush never once pretended they were the cause of a youtube video.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 8:07 am

What if there's a CIA operative inside Ansar Al-Sharia who doesn't want his cover blown, and is too important to extract? Then what? It's almost as though you enjoy making my point for me.

PapaFox - February 19, 2013, 10:02 pm

Hence this poster.

falconfan00 - February 19, 2013, 9:22 pm

It was over for me the minute Hillary said, "What does it matter?" The tolerance you guys have for this behavior is unearthly. I do so wish you'd hold your own party accountable for things I know you don't stand with or for.

crankyhead - February 19, 2013, 3:22 pm

Is the investigation over yet falcon?

falconfan00 - February 19, 2013, 3:19 pm

So Carney knows on the 14th... Congress knows on the 14th... but for reasons of what, 'National Security', Americans have to wait until after the election to learn the truth? Come on man. Think.

falconfan00 - February 19, 2013, 3:12 pm

Sept 14:"Later in that same briefing, Carney is told that Pentagon officials informed members of Congress at a closed-door meeting that the Benghazi attack was a planned terrorist attack."

crankyhead - February 19, 2013, 3:04 pm

It's the press secretary's job to release sensitive state secrets to the public during an ongoing investigation? Come on man, think.

falconfan00 - February 19, 2013, 2:49 pm

Sept. 14: At a White House press briefing, Press Secretary Carney denies reports that it was a preplanned attack. “I have seen that report, and the story is absolutely wrong. We were not aware of any actionable intelligence indicating that an attack on...

crankyhead - February 19, 2013, 2:46 pm

Information is power, after all.

crankyhead - February 19, 2013, 2:45 pm

Standard investigative procedure includes disseminating disinformation. The reason being, when the person on the other end of the phone, has the actual details that weren't made public, then you know you're talking to the guy who's responsible. Simple.

crankyhead - February 19, 2013, 2:43 pm

The possibility exists that the state department might not have believed that a 'little known militant group' actually perpetrated it. I'm sure that a lot of groups looking to up their exposure would love to get credit for things they didn't do. Y'know?

falconfan00 - February 19, 2013, 2:27 pm

"...government emails showed the White House and the State Department were told even as the attack was going on that Ansar al-Sharia, a little-known militant group, had claimed credit for it." And for the next 9 weeks we talked about youtube vids.

PapaFox - February 19, 2013, 2:20 pm

Perhaps you could read that factcheck again for comprehension.

falconfan00 - February 19, 2013, 11:08 am

Yea, i wouldn't bother with that pesky factcheck business if i were you, either. It most definitely infringes on your argument. It's like Hillary Clinton said, "What does it matter?" Apparently not much to folks like her.

PapaFox - February 19, 2013, 10:52 am

Seeing as how the facts came out as they were known during the administration's investigation of the attack, there's no coverup.

falconfan00 - February 19, 2013, 9:51 am

Here's the truth, should you ever decide to care:
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/10/benghazi-timeline/

PapaFox - February 19, 2013, 9:40 am

The "coverup" was invented by Republicans with an axe to grind.

thatmfguy - February 19, 2013, 9:12 am

Sorry you can't grasp things like that, but then again I don't expect much along the lines of "thinking" from the likes of you.

thatmfguy - February 19, 2013, 9:12 am

I really hate to stick up for Bush, who next to Obama, is one of my least favorite presidents, but JGalt has a point. People wouldn't be so outraged over Benghazi if there hadn't been a coverup and denied calls for help.

Renza - February 19, 2013, 7:29 am

Clearly nobody cared to even look into these, a republican was in office.

PapaFox - February 19, 2013, 7:26 am

Thank you for proving my point.

JGalt - February 19, 2013, 6:55 am

were there coverups in any of these? Was security pulled, and lavish parties held elsewhere while security was denied? Waiting for those details before going any further on this one....