Just before my train left Liverpool Street Station for Stansted Airport yesterday, Fran and I were video interviewed by a bloke from something that sounded like «Alan vs the State» on RT TV.

Does anyone know what show this is, and where this NATO/Gladio/22/7 interview will appear?

Adam Vs The Man? http://www.adamvstheman.com/
Adam Kokesh ex US army Vet not sure what channel its broadcast on though
good guy if this is for him _________________'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'

“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”

Anger as Norway police drop internal investigation into shooter Anders Behring Breivik case
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/world/anger-as-norway-police-dro p-internal-investigation-into-shooter-anders-behring-breivik-case/stor y-fnddckzi-1226552379927
January 11, 2013
Anders Behring Breivik detonated a bomb outside the Norwegian centre-left government's headquarters and then went on the rampage at a Labour Party youth camp, killing a total of 77 people.
THE family of a teenager killed by Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik has reacted angrily after a probe into police's slow response to the July 2011 twin attacks was dropped.
"Apparently, no one will ever learn from the grave mistakes that were made on July 22, not the police nor anyone else," lamented Alf Vederhus who lost his son Haavard in Breivik's mass shooting on the island of Utoeya.
The Norwegian police's internal affairs unit said in a statement on Thursday that while there were serious shortcomings in the police's response, it had dropped its investigation into complaints filed by the families of two victims because there was no evidence police had broken the law.
"I think internal affairs looked too lightly on the mistakes that were made," Mr Vederhus told the daily Dagsavisen on Friday.
Breivik, a right-wing extremist, detonated a bomb outside the centre-left government's headquarters and then went on the rampage at a Labour Party youth camp on the island of Utoeya, killing a total of 77 people, many of them teenagers.
He was in August 2012 found sane and sentenced to Norway's maximum sentence of 21 years in prison, a sentence that can be extended indefinitely if he is deemed a continued threat to society.
Breivik confessed to the attacks, calling them "cruel but necessary" to protect his country from the multiculturalism his victims embraced and which he hates.
Less than two weeks before the verdict was rendered, a commission tasked with learning lessons from the attacks harshly criticised the Norwegian authorities, saying the bombing could have been prevented and Breivik's killing spree could have been stopped earlier.

Many survivors of the 2011 massacre on the island of Utøya are disappointed that police aren’t taking any action against their own officers who failed to respond quickly enough to the shooting. A new study also shows that around half of those who were wounded or dodged the killer’s bullets are suffering from depression and severe post-traumatic stress disorder.
Mourners and survivors still visit a makeshift memorial set up on the mainland across from the island of Utøya, the site of a Labour Party youth camp where 69 mostly young persons were killed and hundreds injured during a massacre on July 11, 2011. PHOTO: newsinenglish.no
Newspaper Dagsavisen reported Friday how the father of one young man killed on Utøya is deeply disturbed over a decision announced Thursday by the state police’s internal affairs division that they won’t bring any disciplinary action against officers who failed to reach the island in time to save more lives. Alf Vederhus, who son Håvard was among the 69 persons killed on Utøya, reacted angrily to the news.
“It’s clear that no one is taking the consequences of the serious mistakes that were made on July 22, not within the police or otherwise,” Vederhus told Dagsavisen. “I think Spesialenheten (the police’s special unit for probing internal affairs) is taking the mistakes too lightly.”
Vederhus claimed that the facts, according to the government commission set up to investigate the emergency response to the terrorist attacks of July 22, show that the first police officers to arrive at the pier closest to the island “did nothing to try to get over to Utøya during 40 minutes of shooting.” He noted that they also did too little to acquire boats for the special forces that arrived later.
“For me, it’s disturbing that this doesn’t spark any form of consequences for the police, not in the form of warnings, firings or other personnel action,” Vederhus said. “What I’m reacting to is how the mistakes made that day aren’t having any consequences for anyone.”

‘Can’t see any purpose’
The police report released Thursday states that the internal affairs unit “can’t see that any punitive measures would have a preventative effect.” Jan Egil Presthus, leader of the police internal affairs unit, said the police don’t disagree with the government commission’s highly critical conclusions but don’t see any purpose in further investigation aimed at getting those directly involved punished.
“There was so much that went wrong (on July 22) that it would hardly help to punish any individuals or police as a group,” Presthus told Dagsavisen. He said he can understand the negative reaction from survivors, and that it’s possible state prosecutors may still initiate punitive action.

Survivors suffering
Meanwhile, many of the young survivors are experiencing after-effects of the massacre such as flashbacks, intrusive thoughts, over-sensitivity to noise, sleeping difficulties and problems with concentration, according to child and adolescent psychiatrist Dr Grete Dyb. She is leading research for the so-called “Utøya Study” at the Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies (Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter om vold og traumatisk stress or NKVTS).
325 survivors and 463 parents or carers have been interviewed for the study. One of its aims is to find out what kind of help to give those who lived through the worst massacre in Norwegian history.
Survivor Adrian Pracon has spoken out about how he suffers from suicidal thoughts and exhaustion, and has now sought treatment himself at an open psychiatric unit. Shortly before Christmas he updated the status on his Facebook page to say that “In the aftermath of the July 22 attacks, I am scared about who will become number 78.” Gunman Anders Behring Breivik killed a total of 77 people during his attacks, 69 on Utøya and eight in his bombing of government headquarters of Oslo. He was sentenced last summer to Norway’s longest possible prison term.

Calls for more openness
“Topics like suicide and mental health problems are taboo, but I want to be open about them,” Pracon told newspaper Aftenposten. “I am not the only one who is suffering, and I have thought a lot about whether there will be someone who becomes terror victim number 78. I don’t want it to be me, or one of the other survivors, or one of the bereaved.”
Pracon, 23, who is of Polish descent, came face-to-face with Breivik during the massacre on Utøya, but the terrorist decided not to kill him. During his trail, Breivik said he spared Pracon because he looked right-wing and reminded him of himself.
Pracon made headlines during Breivik’s trial for being involved in a fight outside a pub in Oslo and was found guilty of committing grievous bodily harm. He was ordered to carry out 180 hours of community service, and to pay NOK 10,000 in compensation to one of the victims. He has since apologized for his actions, which he says were stress-related.
Although those injured in the terror attacks have been awarded compensation, many felt let down after the massacre, when money transferred to local governments to fund follow-up health care and counselling for victims and their families, in some cases reportedly went to other projects like road-paving.
Other Utøya survivors have taken up prominent positions in Norwegian politics. Tonje Brenna was headhunted by the Prime Minister to become his top aide, while Labour party youth group AUF leader Eskil Pedersen is aiming for a spot in Parliament, representing the Labour Party. Prableen Kaur is also a high-profile political spokesperson.

This July will mark the second anniversary of Anders Behring Breivik’s terrorist attack in Norway, when he killed 77 people in a bombing in central Oslo, and a mass shooting on the island of Utøya. Last August Breivik was deemed sane and found guilty by the Oslo District Court. We was sentenced to 21 years of preventive detention, which can be extended for as long as he is deemed a danger to society.

Whilst some believe that Breivik’s crimes deserved the ultimate punishment– and are unlikely to have sympathy with his recent complaints about a lack of moisturiser and butter in prison [1] – there is in general a feeling that justice has been done. The man responsible for the horrors in Norway poses no further danger to society, and his imprisonment provides a certain level of closure to the events of July 22nd 2011.

With Breivik safely detained, press coverage of the case has naturally dwindled. Unless one had been specifically looking for updates, it would have been easy to miss a story from earlier this month concerning the severe criticism levelled at Norwegian authorities for their multiple failings in preventing and curtailing Breivik’s attacks [2]. A motion passed in parliament declared it…

“…censurable that the authorities before and during the terrorist attacks of July 22, 2011 didn’t implement more security measures and interventions that could have impeded the terrorist attacks and protected people at the government’s headquarters and at Utøya”
A catalogue of mistakes

Such condemnation follows earlier damning criticism of the Norwegian authorities. Last August an independent commission also found that Breivik could have been stopped much sooner. The Gjørv Report found that if previously approved security measures had been put into place, the road outside parliament in Oslo would not have been open and so Breivik would not have been able to detonate his car bomb outside of it [3].

The commission also found that had there not been a series of errors on the part of the Norwegian police, Breivik’s gun rampage on Utøya could have been stopped much earlier. It took police a long time – 79 minutes – to apprehend him. Their only helicopter was out of use because its crew were on holiday, which meant police had to travel to Utøya by road. Upon arrival an anti-terror team attempted to sail a dinghy from the mainland to the island, but it became overloaded and had to be abandoned. Private boats were then commandeered, but took a route that was three kilometres longer than the shortest crossing point to the island.

Whilst on the island Breivik had reportedly tried to call police 10 times, but a flawed communications system meant he only succeeded in getting through twice. After stating his name and declaring that he wanted to surrender, Breivik stopped shooting and waited to be apprehended. When police did not arrive at the scene or even return his calls, Breivik decided to continue shooting – during which time he murdered many more people.

The Gjørv Report found that Breivik could not only have been stopped much earlier on the actual day of his attack, but even well before it: the attacks “could have been prevented”.

Norway’s intelligence service the PST (the Politiets Sikkerhetstjeneste or Police Security Service) failed to investigate Breivik even though he had appeared on their radar months before his attacks. He had been placed on an intelligence watch list in March 2011, after being flagged up by Interpol under a US-led anti-terror campaign called “Operation Global Shield” [4], for illegally buying chemicals online from a retailer in Poland. As reported in April 2012, the PST had…

“…failed to follow up on a tip about…Breivik’s acquisition of materials that could be used to produce explosives. PST also came under criticism for failing to pay enough attention to Norway’s right-wing extremist groups, and failing to pick up any suspicions about Breivik.”[5]

Defence analyst Anthony Tucker-Jones describes the failings of the PST, and those of the Norwegian Intelligence Service (the NIS, or Etterretningstjenesten) and the counter-terrorist unit Beredskaptroppen, as a “major intelligence catastrophe” [6]. He also observes that…

“The intelligence failure in stopping Breivik’s terror attacks was equal to that of the 9/11 attacks in the United States and the 7/7 bombings in the UK.”
9/11, 7/7, 22/7: a pattern of intelligence failures

Tucker-Jones correctly points out that three of the biggest terror attacks in the 21st century Western world were only successful due to “intelligence failures”. Whilst Tucker-Jones’ comparison was apparently met with “surprise and derision in some quarters”, it is a matter of fact that the intelligence services had key intelligence on the perpetrators prior to their terror attacks.

In the case of the official 9/11 story, “systemic failures throughout the intelligence system” allowed hijackers to commandeer four commercial airliners and successfully crash three of them into their targets, killing nearly 3000 people [7]. A military intelligence unit had actually identified lead hijacker Mohammed Atta, and three other hijackers, a year before the attacks [8]. Pentagon officials apparently prevented them from sharing the information with the FBI, and…

“According to Louis Freeh, former FBI director, if this information had been properly shared, the events of 9/11 would have easily been prevented.”

According to the official story of the London Bombings, failures on the part of the British security service MI5 allowed four young men to detonate backpack bombs on the London transport network on July 7th 2005, killing 52. Two of the bombers had been under MI5 surveillance for 18 months, after being linked to the ringleader of another terror plot known as Operation CREVICE [9].

In all three cases – 9/11, 7/7, and 7/22 – the intelligence services abjectly failed; indeed, the attacks could hardly have been any more ‘successful’ in achieving their terrible objectives. There has been a remarkable lack of accountability for these so called failures.
Little accountability for failures

No-one at any level of the US government has been held accountable for the countless failures [10] leading up to and on 9/11 – and we find a similar lack of accountability from the security services. Head of intelligence at the time of 9/11, George Tenet, stayed in his job and was later awarded the Medal of Freedom, the US’s highest honour. Mike McConnell, head of the National Security Agency prior to 9/11, was later brought out of retirement and appointed Director of National Intelligence.

During the 2011 inquest into the 7/7 London bombings only one MI5 officer was required to give evidence at the hearing, and even then he did so anonymously after an application by Home Secretary Theresa May. The senior MI5 officer simply denied that there had been major intelligence failings, an assertion with which the coroner agreed – despite family members of the bomb victims being highly critical of MI5 and dissatisfied with the verdict [11]. The father of one of those killed on 7/7, Graham Foulkes, said that the inquest…

“…causes a lot more questions to be asked than it answers…It really must compel Theresa May to review the whole operation of the security services in the UK, not just MI5.”

There has been a similar lack of accountability in Norway for the devastating success of Breivik’s attacks. Last August saw the resignation of Norway’s police chief, but the PST – the agency that failed to act on intelligence about Breivik’s purchase of chemicals – did not actually report to the National Police Directorate, but rather the Minister of Justice and Police [12]. Whilst Norway’s Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg accepted responsibility for mistakes that had been made in response to the attacks [13], neither he nor any of his ministers have resigned and there has not been a public inquiry into the PST.

Failures by Western intelligence agencies in stopping massive terror attacks are typically obfuscated, shielding those responsible from accountability. In the case of 7/7, for example, the intelligence services disguised their errors by fooling supervisory bodies with the “selective feeding of information or even by the use of downright deceptive or misleading material,” according to Labour MP Michael Meacher. Such obfuscation allows the intelligence services’ activities to continue unimpeded, beyond the scrutiny of the public and our supposed representatives in government. When under pressure to be more transparent the intelligence services can avoid investigation by citing a supposed threat to national security – a tactic former MI5 officer Annie Machon describes as “the ultimate get-out-of-jail-free card” [14].
The security-industrial complex reaps the profits

In the aftermath of a successful terror attack the focus typically shifts away from the question of incompetence or foreknowledge on the part of the intelligence services. Instead, government deals with the problem by passing legislation that further restricts citizens’ civil liberties, claiming such action is necessary in the name of “security”. The work of the intelligence services remains shrouded in mystery, whilst politicians’ grave warnings of future attacks [15] spread fear amongst the population and justifies the passing of ever more draconian security policies.

The state expands its power and consolidates control over its citizens whilst the security-industrial complex reaps massive financial reward [16], the “revolving door” between politics and big business ensuring the corrupt process runs smoothly. Citizens end up paying for the intelligence services’ mistakes – both figuratively and literally, with enforced income taxation funding the security state and advancing our own enslavement.

Of course, many suspect that “intelligence failures” are but a smokescreen for an even darker and more alarming reality, which is that rogue elements within the governmental and intelligence power structure are actually complicit in enabling and planning terror attacks, to advance their own agendas [17].

Given the proven complicity of the state and intelligence apparatus in horrendous acts of violence against its own citizens, such as Operation Gladio, it would be unwise to dismiss such suspicion as mere “conspiracy theory”.

The grim details of the police operation and aftermath in Norway are of course even darker and more sinister than covered above, but in general, it's more or less correct.

20 months and counting, we still don't know whom in the police denied the use of the police helicopter after the bomb blast for at least 6 hours.

The police helicopter landed near Utøya for the first time at ten past midnight, or almost 6 hours AFTER Breivik was arrested, allegedly «searching for more terrorists» in the dark around midnight.

At a time when all terrorists in their right mind would have fled the island approximately 6 hours ago.

Not only was this policeman – or woman – never punished, we don't even know his or her name, twenty months later.

Something is rotten in the state of Norway, for sure.

But at least, the PST and the police have got seriously beafed up budgets, and every policecar now gets an iPad. Hurray!_________________> this is a crisis i knew had to come
> destroying the balance i'd kept
> turning around to the next set of lies
> wondering what will come next
[ passover / joy division ]

Some 20 relatives are getting ready to sue the police in a civil case for the Utøya massacre.

More at http://gplus.to/ProDemokratiskUnion_________________> this is a crisis i knew had to come
> destroying the balance i'd kept
> turning around to the next set of lies
> wondering what will come next
[ passover / joy division ]

Utøya: Police action during the massacre at Utøya should not be investigated. The Public Prosecutor has decided. Survivors considering civil prosecution.
Published: April 6 Updated: April 6
Tore Letvik

- It is with deep disappointment we Prosecutor's Office's decision. We open now to participate in the civilian criminal case that several of the survivors considering traveling at police, says lawyer Kari Nessa Nordtun Dagsavisen.

Could have been stopped

Stavanger lawyer representing two families who lost loved ones on Utøya 22 July 2011. In August last year the police to Travel Bureau. It was an attempt to get positioned responsible for the police to come out to the country side at Utøya without immediately take over to stop the terrorist massacre of defenseless young.

22. July Commission's report has stated that the government's ability to protect people on Utøya failed and that the killer could have been stopped earlier.

Nevertheless resolved Bureau 8 January this year to either investigate police officers, police station or the Police Directorate for possible criminal violations under Utøya campaign.

Bureau brought in information from 22 July Commission's report and found that "there is no reasonable basis to initiate an investigation" of the relevant police officials. The Bureau is the government agency with a mandate to investigate possible criminal offenses committed by police officers.

Presses the Case

Bureau's decision could only be overturned by the Public Prosecutor, who is the prosecution's highest authority.

- We appealed the decision, but it is now clear that the Public Prosecutor chooses to maintain the Bureau's decision, saying Nordtun.

She thinks it is regrettable that the Bureau did not even deem it necessary to institute investigations and Prosecutions applaud the decision.

- As a citizen, one is then left with only one choice if you feel that no one has been held accountable: to private prosecution, the economic risks and human burden is on the individual, says Nordtun.

Could be lots of lawsuits

Aftenposten wrote yesterday that a larger number of survivors want to get positioned responsible for police action against Utøya. Lawyer Mette Yvonne Larsen was coordinating counsel before and during the criminal case against Anders Behring Breivik. She has approached the aggrieved group to inform them about the initiative.

- Currently, we are talking about more than 30 people, but there are also some that are negative and that the case should be put away, she says to Aftenposten.

The group will now look at the basis for erecting a private prosecution against police employees who may have committed gross negligence in service. Yesterday Nordtun in contact with Larsen on behalf of their clients.

- We have not made a final decision, but allows that we too will join as plaintiffs, said Nordtun.

In the so-called påtegningsarket where Prosecutions Now stop all possibilities for a public inquiry into police action, states the following:

"The Bureau has conducted a thorough review of the 22-July-commission report and a significant number of other relevant documents. (...) The Office of Attorney General joins the Bureau's report and reviews. One refers to the decision 8 January this year and prosecuting setting of 31 October 2012 that generally are also pertinent to the attorney general's views on the matter. It is alleged in the complaint provides no basis for a different conclusion. (...) The Office of Attorney General's decision may not be appealed.

strong police criticism

* Starting at 17.21 to 18.30 were 69 people, mostly young people, were killed in the massacre at the Utøya 22 July 2011. Many were shot and killed by Anders Behring Breivik while armed policemen were on land without immediately obtaining a boat so they could get to the island.
* Bureau of Police Affairs and the Public Prosecutor's agree that there is no basis to investigate the possible inaction by police during Utøya campaign may have been criminal. This despite the fact that 22 July Commission's report include beating down the following strong criticism:
* The government's ability to protect people on Utøya failed.
* A faster police action would have been possible.
* The killer could have been stopped earlier 22 July._________________> this is a crisis i knew had to come
> destroying the balance i'd kept
> turning around to the next set of lies
> wondering what will come next
[ passover / joy division ]

If you have information about who plans to sue, perhaps you could send them this link to 'Gladio'; it contains all three episodes.
I doubt if it is available with Norwegian subtitles:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGHXjO8wHsA

As Norway is in NATO (I believe a founding member) then the same kinds of right-wing terror (in the 'Gladio' cases, always blamed on the left) to attain government (or 'Shadow Government') aims should certainly be suspected._________________'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.

I know, Outsider, just guess my novel written specifically about these issues – even Gladio – and in Norwegian will be a better medium to give to these poor people.

Otherwise, that's a great documentary!_________________> this is a crisis i knew had to come
> destroying the balance i'd kept
> turning around to the next set of lies
> wondering what will come next
[ passover / joy division ]

Published on Friday, 5th April, 2013 at 21:39 under the news category, by Ben McPherson.
Last Updated on 5th April 2013 at 22:22.

Families of victims of the Utøya shootings are considering legal action against both the police and the Norwegian state for failings which allowed Anders Behring Breivik to commit the worst spree killing by a single gunman ever to occur in peacetime.

69 people were killed on the island on 22nd July 2011. The victims were mainly children and young people.

These fatalities were in addition to the eight who lost their lives due to the bomb he planted outside government headquarters in Oslo preceding the island of Utøya massacre the same day.

The 22nd July Commission report published last year was heavily critical of both the police and the state. It pointed to systemic failings that made the attacks less preventable, and led to poor decision-making and failures to pass on relevant and potentially life-saving information.

Amongst the most damning facts to emerge from the report was that police had received an accurate description of Breivik over the telephone, along with the licence plate number of his vehicle he used to travel to the island. The employee who took the call failed to pass the information on, however.

The first two police officers to arrive at the scene hid behind a skip on the mainland, despite being 700 metres from Utøya.

A police helicopter could not be mobilised because only two pilots were qualified to fly it and both were on holiday.

Police emergency phone networks were inadequate to handle the stream of calls coming in, with major gaps in emergency network coverage.

Jarl Robert Christensen, whose 15-year-old daughter Birgitte Smetbak that Breivik had shot twice, told Norwegian daily Aftenposten he believes “The political process in Parliament after the 22nd July Commission report has led nowhere.”

“It just played to the gallery. That’s why it’s important that we consider where legal responsibility lies for all the police errors.”

Birgitte Smetbak died of bullet wounds after waiting three hours for help to arrive. She was not evacuated until 20:15 approximately an hour and 40 minutes after Breivik had been arrested. Her father is one of many bereaved parents preparing to sue.

The report has not led to significant action on the part of the state, but it establishes a very clear timeline, as well as attributing responsibility for failings. It therefore provides a legal basis for court cases against both the government and police.

“In my view the bereaved need to have this cleared up,” Mette Yvonne Larsen told Aftenposten. She acted as a representative of the bereaved in the 10-week long court case in which Breivik was found guilty and sentenced to Norway’s maximum jail term of 21 years.

“It’s important to have a reliable clarification of who is responsible. It’s only natural with the 22nd July Commission’s report as a basis and in the knowledge of the enormous losses suffered,” she said.

One of the report’s key findings was that the authorities failed to protect people on Utøya, and that Breivik could have been stopped earlier. A legal investigation will establish who can be sued.

Likely candidates include the Ministry of Justice, the Directorate of Police, and the police chiefs who ran operations.

Just before my train left Liverpool Street Station for Stansted Airport yesterday, Fran and I were video interviewed by a bloke from something that sounded like «Alan vs the State» on RT TV.

Does anyone know what show this is, and where this NATO/Gladio/22/7 interview will appear?

Adam K is now denying that he even was in London that day. Strange._________________> this is a crisis i knew had to come
> destroying the balance i'd kept
> turning around to the next set of lies
> wondering what will come next
[ passover / joy division ]

The PST Security Police first urged for this «Solo Terrorist» legislation 4 months *before* the Breivik/Utøya massacre on July 22nd, 2011. The PST also helped found Breivik's NDL zionist Kampfgruppe through one of their admitted operatives, thus radicalising Breivik further.

Du skal ikke tenke. Basically._________________> this is a crisis i knew had to come
> destroying the balance i'd kept
> turning around to the next set of lies
> wondering what will come next
[ passover / joy division ]

Pro-Israel fund «Fritt Ord» gives £10,000 to «Fjordman» blogger who inspired the Zionist child-killer from Utøya, to write book about the terrorist.

This nation is going straight down the drain.

Not even Odin can save us now._________________> this is a crisis i knew had to come
> destroying the balance i'd kept
> turning around to the next set of lies
> wondering what will come next
[ passover / joy division ]

Norwegian neo-Nazi musician said to be an 'Anders Breivik sympathiser' arrested in France over fears he was plotting a similar massacre
Kristian Vikernes was arrested with his French wife Marie Chachet
She had recently bought four rifles
40-year-old Vikernes is a convicted murderer from Norway
Previously received a copy of a manifesto from Breivik

A neo-Nazi linked to Norwegian mass killer Anders Behring Breivik has been arrested in France today following fears he might stage a large 'terrorist act'.

Kristian Vikernes, a well-known black metal musician in Norway, was arrested with his French wife Marie Chachet after she recently bought four rifles.

The 40-year-old, who is a convicted murderer from Norway, had in the past received a copy of a manifesto from Breivik, the far-right militant who killed 77 people in 2011.

=/=
Neo-Nazi: Kristian Varg Vikernes, pictured left in 1999, has been arrested in France on suspicion of planning a terrorist attack. He has previously received a copy of a manifesto from Anders Behring Breivik, right

In a statement, France's Interior Minister Manuel Valls said: 'Having received the manifesto before (Breivik) committed his crimes and having been sentenced in Norway in the past for murder, this individual, who was close to a neo-Nazi movement, was likely to prepare a large terrorist act.'

Officers were searching his home in Correze for weapons and explosives, a police source said.

Breivik killed 77 people in a bombing in central Oslo and a shooting spree on a nearby island in July 2011. He was imprisoned last year for a maximum term of 21 years.

Breivik sent a copy of his manifesto setting out his ideology to Vikernes, an official at the Paris prosecutor's office said.

Breivik is a strong pro-zionist, whilst Varg is constantly accused of being an «anti semite».

The terror attack against Varg's farm house, kids and pregnant wife was totally unfounded, the state had no proof he was doing anything, except from blogging.

This was a political arrest, that only works to strengthen Varg's movement. That may be the ultimate purpose here.

Marie Cachet, Varg's pregnant wife, is a member of a shooting club and has a licence to own and buy rifles.

PS: Half of the Norwegian parliament received Breivik's manifest by email, along with 5000 other people in a number of countries. None of them were arrested by violent gendarmerie paramilitaries blowing up their doors, so obviously France is lying about Varg being «connected to Breivik».

PPS: I guess with his kind of background, a murderer with almost two decades served in jail, and with a nazi-ish blog, he'd be a bit more creative if he was *really* planning a massacre/terror attack, than ordering rifles mostly suitable for peacock hunting through his wife and mother of his three kids. He may be Norwegian, but he's certainly no fool!_________________> this is a crisis i knew had to come
> destroying the balance i'd kept
> turning around to the next set of lies
> wondering what will come next
[ passover / joy division ]

Breivik was a curious thing - a Zio-Nazi - a mindset not understood by the world and that's the way those that ordered this arrest want it to stay.

Right from the onset, or actually since 5 months before the terror, I've referred to his kind as 'national zionists'.

The NDL — Norwegian Defence League — that Norwegian secret police PST helped to set up and found, announced a demo in Oslo in January/February of 2011. And in this debate, I analysed NDL's (and Breivik's) ideology, and found it to be 'national zionist'.

A sort of self-deceptive nationalism that really serves most a foreign power and a foreign culture, but mixed in with local screams for purity etc, to lure the working-class, football supporter types into this madness.

PS: I recently watched the Pink Floyd movie «The Wall» again. And in the scenes where racist thugs smashed immigrant shops and restaurants in England, I thought that when I saw it in my youth, I never imagined these future thugs would be pro-zionist thugs. Amazing._________________> this is a crisis i knew had to come
> destroying the balance i'd kept
> turning around to the next set of lies
> wondering what will come next
[ passover / joy division ]

From PDU @ Google+_________________> this is a crisis i knew had to come
> destroying the balance i'd kept
> turning around to the next set of lies
> wondering what will come next
[ passover / joy division ]

During interrogation, Breivik claimed membership in an "international Christian military order" that "fights" against "Islamic suppression". This order allegedly is called the "Knights Templar" and, according to his manifesto, has between fifteen and eighty "ordinated knights" besides an unknown number of "civilian members".[73]

The order, whose full name is the "Pauperes commilitones Christi Templique Solomonici" or PCCTS, is said to have been established in London in April, 2002, as a "re-founding" of the twelfth-century crusading order. The new organisation supposedly was established to take political and military control of Western Europe, with its members being armed as an "anti-Jihad crusader-organisation". It reportedly was established by nine men: two Englishmen, a Frenchman, a German, a Dutchman, a Greek, a Russian, a Norwegian, and a Serb. The main initiator apparently was the Serb, whom Breivik claims to have visited in Liberia and whom he referred to as a "war hero".

Breivik said that his own code name was "Sigurd Jorsalfar" (recalling the twelfth-century King Sigurd I of Norway, himself a Crusader) and that his "mentor" was "Richard Lionheart". Breivik asserted that Norway had "4,848 traitors" who had to die.[3]

In his manifesto, Breivik wrote that "[t]he PCCTS, Knights Templar is . . . . not a religious organization but rather a Christian 'culturalist' military order."[4]

Religion

On his Facebook profile, Breivik describes himself as a Christian.[45] Breivik states that he chose to be baptised into the Church of Norway at the age of 15 although he later became disenchanted with Norway's State Church.[74] In his manifesto, he described himself as a "moderately religious" protestant (p. 1398) who supports "a reformation of Protestantism leading to it being absorbed by Catholisism [sic]". Elsewhere in his manifesto, Breivik also declared himself to be the "a savior of our people and of European Christendom" (p. 1435).[4]

Police reports describe Breivik as a "Christian fundamentalist".[9][75] However, in contrast to the common theological understanding of such in the American sense, that of "militantly anti-modernist Protestant evangelicalism," and its emphasis on Protestant doctrine and salvation by faith,[76] in his manifesto Breivik referred to "Protestantism as the Marxism of Christianity," (p. 1346) and criticized salvation by faith and deplored "Christian fundamentalist theocracy" as "everything we do not want", in favor of "a secular European society based on our Christian cultural heritage", (p. 1346) while he also commended the separation of Church and state. (p. 1132)

Breivik invoked Roman Catholic Canon Law and the example of the Crusades for support, and looked toward a "Crusader Pope." (p. 1135) He also believed those who died in his case were worthy of an Indulgence, (pp. 1324-26, 46) and stated, "If there is a God I will be allowed to enter heaven as all other martyrs for the Church in the past," (p. 1345) and advocated that such potential martyrs take of "the Eucharist (Holy Communion/The Lord's Supper)" for strength to face such death. (p. 1345)

Breivik condemns Pope Benedict XVI, however, for his dialogue with Islam: “Pope Benedict has abandoned Christianity and all Christian Europeans and is to be considered a cowardly, incompetent, corrupt and illegitimate Pope.” It will thus be necessary, writes Breivik, to overthrow the Protestant and Catholic hierarchies, after which a “Great Christian Congress” would set up a new European Church.[77]

Breivik also considered it sufficient that one be "a Christian-agnostic or a Christian atheist" to fight for his Christian cultural heritage, (p. 1361, 62) and held that "it is essential that science takes an undisputed precedence over biblical teachings." (p. 1403)

In an insight on his personal morality, Breivik liked the clubs in Hungary, but avoided affairs with females for the sake of his mission, though he enjoyed getting drunk at his birthday party. (p. 1415) He also enjoyed video games such as "World of Warcraft' and "Dragon Age Origins," and stated "I regret to admit that I’ve become a notorious downloader of pirated movies, series and games etc." (p. 1418)...

A survivor of the Utøya terror attack on Monday said Norway had learned little from the massacre of 77 people, claiming that the "undergrowth of hateful rhetoric" had recovered from the right-wing extremist attacks that shocked Norway and the world.

While Norway has put the terrorist Anders Behring Breivik behind bars, think tank researcher Ali Esbati noted in an op-ed in the Swedish left-leaning tabloid Aftonbladet that one of Breivik's main inspirations, the Norwegian blogger Fjordman aka Peder Nøstvold Jensen, recently received a 75,000 kroner ($12,600) scholarship to write a book.

While the ensuing debate about Jensen soon becoming an author had centred on freedom of speech, Esbait argued that several commentators seemed not to understand the ramifications of legitimizing his rightwing views.

"They hold positions from which public debate can be treated like a racy board game, rather than an arena where real life conditions are at stake," Esbati wrote. "An arena where there is a constant tug of war about where the demarcation lines of what is acceptable should be defined, not legally but socially."

"Two years after the terror attacks, it is clear the Norwegian society has not been able to process the events. Instead, the attacks' very atrociousness has instead made it more difficult to counteract islamophobia and ultra-reactionary advances," argued Esbati, who survived the shooting spree on the island of Utoya two years ago, when Breivik killed 69 people after killing eight others with a bomb in Oslo's government quarters. Esbati attended the memorial service at Oslo Cathedral on Monday, at one point hiding his face in his hands as though overcome by emotion.

"People reason that everyday racism is miles apart from Breivik's mass murder," he continued in his op-ed, in which he asked that Norwegians make more of an effort to put the terror attacks in their political context.

Esbati chose to use the "mass invasion of beggars" discourse, in which rumours that had swept Oslo after migrants from European countries travelled to Norway to ask for money last summer, as a case in point in his argument that everyday racism had not been obliterated following the attacks.

"Oslo municipality issued rules against people sleeping in parks and by the roadside, which in practice was a ban aimed directly at the Roma," Esbati argued. "These signals from above gain strength, as always, from comments fields and social media, where you can read about vermin and the need to clean up and discharge people."

"The debate is influenced by the fact that the rightwing populist Fremskrittspartiet (FRP) is big and well established today, which gives its views an immediate stamp of being popular and normal," Esbati wrote, noting that the party's approval rating had reached 20 percent in recent opinion polls and that the party has struck a deal with conservative opposition party Høyre to form a government after September's general elections if the Labour Party loses.

"One of FRP's most prominent MPs is Christian Tybring-Gjedde. The summer before the Utøya terror he wrote a long accusation letter against the Labour Party, asking why it had decided to replace Norwegian culture with multiculturalism, a miniature UN. He wrote about stabbing Norway's own culture in the back, and how he'd never be part of it," Esbati elaborated.

While Norwegian commentators at the time of the attacks noted that there where parallels in Tybring-Gjedde's and Breivik's rhetoric, the former is back in "full swing", Esbati continued.

"When he's not giving insinuating tips to Muslim parents about how to raise their children or broadcasting warnings that Oslo will soon have a non-Western majority population, he writes articles about how journalists ignoring the price tag of high immigration, which will be paid by their children instead," Esbati said.

Weird how it all fits in with that peculiar German fascination for Nordic racial purity
20 years or so ago I met some Germans in Ireland who were being funded on a nice long casual trip over a year or so right across Northern Europe to take DNA samples of Scots Pine trees
You guessed it, that week they were checking the 'racial purity' of the Scots pines in North West Ireland.
Feigning seriousness I asked them - but where in the world are the MOST pure Scots pine trees?
They had no idea I was mocking them, so deeply into this mindset they were.
"Ah!", they thought they had met a kindred spirit also obsessed with genetic cleanliness, "The most pure Scots Pine trees we have ever found are in Norway".

TorsteinViddal wrote:

The NDL — Norwegian Defence League — that Norwegian secret police PST helped to set up and found, announced a demo in Oslo in January/February of 2011. And in this debate, I analysed NDL's (and Breivik's) ideology, and found it to be 'national zionist'.

A sort of self-deceptive nationalism that really serves most a foreign power and a foreign culture, but mixed in with local screams for purity etc, to lure the working-class, football supporter types into this madness.

Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik, the gunman who killed 77 people near Oslo in 2011, was accepted to Oslo University from his prison cell to study political science.

Breivik gained admission to the university on Friday, but will have no contact with professors or students as he completes his course of study through prison staff during his 21-year prison sentence. Breivik’s first application to the university was rejected last year.

“All inmates in Norwegian prisons have a right to pursue higher education in Norway if they meet the admission requirements and are successful in competition with other applicants,” wrote Ole Petter Ottersen, the university’s rector, in an online statement. “It is part of the universities’ mission to uphold democratic values, ideals and practices, also when these are challenged by heinous acts.”

Norwegian researchers speculated evening news on 22 July 2011 regarding an Islamist attack, but it soon turned out that the person responsible, Anders Behring Breivik, had been inspired by a very different political environment. This article looks at the perpetrator inspirers and which actors might have had an interest to use him. It is emphasized not least violent network and financial ties that Breivik's manifesto and other testimony pointing.
English Abstract

Inspiration, interests, initiation and investments in Breivik's world The terrorist attacks in Norway on 22 July 2011 were first described as an al-Qaeda operation. When Anders Behring Breivik was arrested and we were comfortable two look at his video and read his manifesto, it Became clear That he was inspired by Jewish-Christian anti-jihadist writers, the very individuals That had pointed two al-Qaeda in the first place . Some critics argued That Breivik had BEEN exceptionally by Israeli forces with an interest in changing Norway's policy towards Palestine, as if Breivik had COPIED the Israeli bombing of the British headquarters in Jerusalem in 1946, on the very anniversary of That attack. However, inspiration and interests are not enough. One Also has two look that Breivik's contacts That supposedly financed him and initiated him into his crusading "Knights Templar" order. Breivik himself points to Serbian crusaders, while others points to an East-European military mafia. The two Converge, however, into one network That is surprisingly close to Saudi and Chechen intelligence and to the very Islamists That Breivik detests, as though Breivik's Knights Templar were the mirror image of al-Qaeda.
Inspirer

On July 22, the clock 3:26 p.m., a bomb exploded in the government quarter in Oslo. Several ministries were seriously injured, including the prime minister's office. Two hours later came reports of a man who had shot at people at the AUF summer camp on Utøya. TV channel Fox News reported that an al Qaeda group, Ansar al-Jihad al-Alami, had claimed responsibility for the attack in Oslo. Former US Deputy Secretary of State and UN ambassador John Bolton told Fox News (July 22):

"It sure looks like Islamic terrorism."

"The attacks scope also suggests al Qaeda," said terrorism expert Magnus Ranstorp (NRK, 2011). Wall Street Journal, New York Times, BBC, Reuters, CBS News and CNN talked all about an attack from al-Qaida. After it became clear that the culprit was a Norwegian, Anders Behring Breivik, and that he had sent out a 1500 page manifesto (Breivik, 2011), was the interpretation changed.

The manifesto was partly written and seemed to show that he was primarily influenced by Western "anti jihadists" as Bat Ye'or, who has written about Europe as "Eurabia," Peder Jensen, who has written under the pseudonym "Fjordman" for Gates of Vienna, Daniel Pipes of Middle East Quarterly, was adviser to presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani, Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch and Atlas Shrugs blog with Pamela Geller (Breivik, 2011). Spencer and Geller recently wrote a book with foreword by John Bolton: The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration's War on America (2010). Bolton says that he is a possible Republican presidential candidate. They all belong to what we in Norway would call an "Israeli-American right-wing extremism."

Pamela Geller wrote on July 22 before Breivik was been arrested, "Islamist websites celebrating the attack." One commentator says:

"In Norway it's more IMPORTANT two boycott Israeli products than protect the population from Muslim extremist."

Another comment says:

"Islam is an invading army, nothing else."

A third says:

"So, -Jihad comes to Norway. No surprise really "(Atlas Shrugs).

After Breivik was been arrested have said anti-jihadists renounced him, but for many of them this was not enough. Geller wrote on his blog Atlas Shrugs on July 31 that also what happened on Utøya before Breivik's massacre was unacceptable. She points to a photo of the Foreign Minister and the AUF leader Eskil Pedersen and behind them a parole: "Boycott Israel".

Geller writes:

But the jihad-loving media never foretold us what anti-Semitic war games rooms were playing on That island. Utøya Island is a Communist / Socialist campground, cheaper than its fancy Clearly had a pro-Islamic agenda [...] [Fox News] Glenn Beck was not far off When he Compared it to the Hitler Jugend (Atlas Shrugs, July 31, 2011).

The day before, on July 30, she shows in a comment on a discussion she had earlier, on June 24, 2007. She had published what she described as "a heartbreaking e-mail" from an anonymous Norwegian on his blog.

He wrote:

Well, yes, the situation is worsening. Stepping up from 29,000 Immigrants everyyear, in 2007 we will be getting a total of 35,000 Immigrants from somalia, iran, iraq and afghanistan. The nations capital is alreadytakenusername 50% Muslim, and They All go there after entering Norway. Adding the 1.2 births per woman per year from Muslim women, there will be 300 000+ muslims out of the then 480,000 inhabitants of That city. Orders from Libya and Iran say That Oslo will be known as Medina at the latest in 2010 [...] From Israel the hordes clawing at the walls of Jerusalem Proclaimers cheerfully That next year there will be no more Israel, and I know Israel shrugs this off as do I, and will mount a strike during the summer against all of its enemies in the middle east. This will make the muslims worldwide go into a frenzy, attac king everyone around themselve. We are stockpiling and caching weapons, ammunition and equipment. This is going to happen fast [...] Never fear, Pamela. God is with you too in this coming hour (Atlas Shrugs, 24 June 2007).

Following this is a discussion on her blog about the necessity of employing violence and a possible civil war in Norway. John Jay, director of Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer's "Stop the Islamization of America", says:

"I only hope That in event civil war breaks out there or [in] any other democracy, that the US still has enough moral clarity two supply the native population with guns and ammunition if not troops." A third participant says: "nice letter [...] [but] he or she could be prosecuted under hate-speech laws for writing or posting in Norway what you have passed on to us. "

Pamela Geller wrote:

"Yes gymnastics, wooden why I ran it anonymously" (ibid).

After Breivik massacre edited Geller his blog from 2007 and tokk away two statements:

"We are stockpiling and caching weapons, ammunition and equipment. This is going to happen fast. "

These words could be perceived as sensitive, she wrote (Atlas Shrugs, July 30, 2011). When certain Central American gestalts like Pamela Geller and Glenn Becker compares AUF with Hitler Jugend and discusses the necessity of a civil war in Norway, you have to wonder if they do not also have had some influence on Breivik. Have they been his inspirers? Mao: there are links between Breivik physical violence and the hatred and the assertion of storage of weapons and ammunition that are presented on these sites? These figures are not peripheral. Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer has political ties to Fox News, the Ambassador and former Deputy Secretary of State John Bolton and Lt. Gen. William Boykin, former assistant deputy defense minister in charge of intelligence, and to other parts of the neoconservative environment. Boykin, a former commander of US special forces, said:

"Europe is doomed, and in the middle of this century Europe will be an Islamic continent" (Ray Blog).

But these possible the inspiring is naturally not directly responsible for terrorism attacks. They could all have influenced and inspired Breivik, but there are so far no indications that Geller and Spencer or Bolton and Boykin would be involved in any kind of plan that includes Breivik.
Stakeholders

More serious is that some comments not only can be described as perceptions, but also as a possible semi-official signals. This applies particularly to an article by Barry Rubin in the Jerusalem Post on July 31. Rubin is a central Israeli-American anti-jihadist, who has been an advisor to the Israeli government. He writes for the New York Times, Washington Post and Wall Street Journal, for Foreign Affairs and Foreign Policy. He sits on the board for Daniel Pipes Middle East Quarterly. Rubin wrote that the AUF program on Utøya was essentially a "pro-terrorist program" (Rubin, 2011). Labour's conversation with Hamas and support for a Palestinian state was, according to Rubin, perceiving as support for terrorism. He wrote:

IF A TERRORIST murders by Hamas and the Islamists did not stop well-intentioned future leaders of Norway from considering themselve heroic underdogs, an evil local man could think his act of terrorism would gain sympathy and change Europe's politics (ibid).

For the Norwegian government, with their own children or friends' children on Utøya, and some died there, appeared this as uncomfortable. According to Rubin would Norwegian politics (support for "terrorism") could cause the Norway being subjected to terrorism. It is easy to read this as a threat. Did someone would mark against Norway that the Norwegian Israel policy is "unacceptable"? Despite the fact that Norway is not

perceive talks as "terrorism", this is a sensitive issue in a country that in recent years only been exposed to one political assassination, in Lillehammer, when Mossad executed a Palestinian (and, as it turned out, incorrect Palestinian). Then the execution team immediately arrested on 22 July 1973 and this was one of the most embarrassing events in Mossad history. A simple chronology from May can provide an indication. On May 5, criticized the Israeli president Shimon Peres Norway for talks with Hamas (TV2, 2011a). On July 14 criticized the Jerusalem Post said Mr Støre. On July 18 had Støre Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on a visit to Oslo. Støre said:

"Norway is ready to recognize a Palestinian state when it is ready."

He signed a deal with President Abbas and the Palestinian messenger in Oslo was given ambassador rank (MFA, 2011). Two days later, said Jonas Gahr Støre on Utøya:

"The occupation must cease, the wall must be demolished and it must happen now" (TV2, 2011b).

This was a language that the Israelis perceived as unacceptable. On July 22, conducted the pro-Israeli Breivik's terror attack in the government quarter and Utøya. He wrote in his manifesto that he directed against Labour and its "multiculturalism" which opened to Muslim immigration and for talks with Hamas. Two days later, said Defense Minister Ehud Barak (2011) to the Israeli army:

"The Government's most important task is to mobilize Europe to stop the Palestinian management proposals [of a Palestinian state]."

On July 24, apologized Jerusalem Post incident in Norway, but wrote that Norway must question of "multiculturalism" (JP, 24 July). On July 28 wrote a columnist in the Jerusalem Post unflattering criticism of Norway (Glick, 2011). On July 31, wrote Barry Rubin his column in The Jerusalem Post with the claim that Norwegian "supporting terrorism" (against Israel), may have led to terrorism directed against Norway. This led to an indignant criticism of Jews in Norway. On August 4 asked Jerusalem Post Norway apologize and jamførte certain persons Islamophobia with Nazism description of Jews in the 30s (JP, 31 July). The day after The Jerusalem Post published a sharp critique of primarily Rubin, written by State Secretary Espen Barth Eide (2011). But among the 300 comments after Jerusalem Post apology, backed up many of Rubin. On Israeli sites suggested one to let the Norwegians' drown in blood "," they deserve it "(Goldberg, 2011).

On September 27, said Espen Barth Eide of the UN that Norway wanted Palestine welcomed as a full member of the United Nations (TV2, 2011c). Immediately after the incident complained Israeli President Shimon Peres and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu terrorist attacks in Oslo and Utøya in unambiguous formulations against King Harald and Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg. Here was no Israeli blur, but simultaneously sent other non meaningless Israeli actors a signal that Norway must assume their own loss if one continues its Palestine policy. Bombing and massacre in Norway on July 22 should, according to this reasoning, have been a response to Norwegian politics.

The parallel is said (WMR, 2011) to be the Jewish paramilitary group Irgun bombing of King David Hotel in Jerusalem, 1946. After the British security forces had sought to quell the Jewish military organizations, gave the paramilitary organization Haganah instruction to the extremist group Irgun (and forthcoming Prime Minister Menachem Begin) to place the bombs in the King David Hotel. The hotel served as the British government's colonial headquarters. The bombing was directed against British rule in order to force them to change their policies without officially the Jewish side acknowledged terrorist attack. On July 22, a bomb detonated Irgun in King David Hotel. 91 persons were killed (41 Arabs, 28 Britons, 17 Palestinian Jews and some others). The British were upset. Jewish leaders immediately condemned the terrorist attack in unequivocal formulations (King David Hotel wiki). The leader of the Haganah, the later Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, denounced Irgun. Far later it was confirmed that there were Haganah who had instructed the Irgun. The bombing of the King David Hotel is believed to have contributed to the British gave up the colonial board in 1948.

When 60-årsminnet about bombing was celebrated in 2006 by Irgun activists and current Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, protesting the British authorities, who believed that the celebration was inappropriate (ibid). Both in Jerusalem 1946 and in Oslo in 2011 was the official apology in contrast to the unofficial language of power. It has pointed out that there is an Israeli tradition of terrorism. According to Prime Minister Moshe Sharett should Ben-Gurion's employee Shimon Peres have been directly involved in the bombing of the American and British cultural institutions in Cairo and Alexandria in 1954 (Rockach, 1980). The buildings were blown to blame the Egyptians and create splits between Egypt and USA / UK. But Israeli agents in Egypt were taken, agent network was rolled up, and Israeli Defense, Pinhas Lavon, was forced to resign. Prime Minister Sharett was not informed. In his diary he lays the blame on former Prime Minister and head of the Haganah, David Ben-Gurion (ibid). Israel denied responsibility for 50 years, but in 2005 was attacked officially celebrated by President Moshe Katzav (Lavon Affair wiki). Israel celebration of brutal bombings for only a few years ago, and the similarity with King David Hotel-operation, together with Israel's stated criticism of Norwegian politics, has led some observers to ask whether Israel was behind the attacks in Oslo on July 22 (WMR, 2011; Azaziah, 2011).

Breivik writes that Israel is "our primary allies" and that "it has been determined [when] the attack should be carried out" (Breivik, 2011: 1424), as if someone should have given him instructions to carry out the attack on a particular day. This "someone" should have chosen the date for revenge for the debacle in 1973, and at the same day that honored the first major Israeli bomb attack on the King David Hotel, the same day, on 22 July. Initiation Masters In spite of that there is a certain logic in these arguments, this is not any explanation. It is not sufficient to seek answers in Breivik's anti-jihadism and violence rhetoric or possible Israeli interests or in their celebration of bombings. The operations were carried out on a specific date with a symbolic meaning, nor is any proof. Perhaps it was then that Breivik would honor the first Crusader victory in Jerusalem on 22 July 1099. It is also not enough to point out that Breivik has been characterized by the NATO bombing of Serbia in the Kosovo war. Serbs were humbled, and it laid the foundation of a Serbian revanchism which should have meant a lot to Breivik, but this can not in itself explain how a Norwegian was capable of blowing up the government quarter and shooting close to 100 people on Utøya (with 69 killed).

Inspiration and interests may not provide an adequate explanation. Nor Breivik's unhappy relationship with his father may explain his insensitivity. His training with video games and use of drugs (steroids) may have made him more insensitive, but even this is enough. A person who feels hatred and read out to the necessity of killing, can not just walk out on the street to shoot 100 children. Such a task requires a brutalization, for example. a bloody war experience or a paramilitary training that can lower the threshold for use of massive violence. It must be examined whether there may be a different environment that Breivik has operated than the intellectual anti-jihadism. We know that both Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer has supported extremist English Defence League (EDL) (Jihad Watch, 2010). EDL is however very violent and has conducted attacks against Muslims. Despite the EDL is pro-Israeli has many in EDL close ties to the Nazi environment, and there is a tension between the pro-Israeli EDL and its Nazi-inspired activists. Breivik writes:

I used to have more than 600 EDL members as Facebook friends and have spoken with tens of EDL members and leaders. In fact; I was one of the individuals WHO supplied themwith processed ideological material [...] [But] the KT [Knights Templar] view the EDL as naïve fools, wasting all Reviews their energy monkey screaming two deaf ears while They should instead have focused on Means and methods That are Meaningful in regards two Achieving true political change, in regards two tearing down the multi culturalist regime known as Britain (Breivik, 2011: 1436).

The red Maltese cross that Breivik has on the cover of his manifesto comes from the Knights Templar, but a similar cross is also EDLs symbol. One of the founders, a former spokesman for the EDL, Paul Ray, now lives in Malta and is concerned by the Templars. He uses the name "Lionheart" (Ray Blog), which in Breivik's manifesto acts as the name of his mentor (Breivik, 2011: 1415). Breivik also says that one of the founders of the EDL is possibly one of the founders of the "Knights Templar" (p. 1363). Online Videos are available from an "Order 777" showing Rays ties to the German "temple knight" and former Nazi Nick Greger. A video shows the Templars, Ray and Greger in t-shirts with the same Maltese cross that Ray has on his blog and that Breivik has on the cover of their manifest (Ray Blog). Another video shows their hero Gen. William Boykin (ibid) which preaches war against Islam.

Rays Templar Knights videos and Gregers Order 777 videos showing the Christian heroes, fight against Islam and the Templar coming victory just like Breivik's own video which he posted online (Greger video; Breivik video). The sacred choral and the repeated inzoomingen images with wide black frames is the same. One must ask if it is the same person who made these videos. Same painting of a kneeling Templar found in Breivik's manifesto and the video from the Order 777. Whether there is a connection between Breivik and Order 777, or so it must be a professional third player involved. Order 777 videos also show Greger in Africa, in Liberia and his stated support for Liberia's former President Charles Taylor and the Serb commander Milorad Ulemek or "Legija". Greger also talks about his ties to the Russian mob.

Ulemek was a Serbian criminal, "crusader" and deputy commander of the Serb paramilitary force Arkan's Tigers, which spread death and terror in Bosnia in the 1990s. Ulemek was in 1999 head of the Serbian special forces and some videos of him from the 1990s uses the same aesthetics and symbolism that Order 777 movies (and Breivik's film). Certain sequences of these films are identical (Greger video; Ulemek video). Either Greger copied these videos, or so they have all been edited by someone within the Serbian network. Ulemek belonged to the Serbian mafia (Zemun) and had ties to the Russian mob. He was convicted of the assassination attempt on Vuk Draskovic and the murder of former President Ivan Stambolic in 2000 (and his men struck Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic in 2003). At the same time many Serbs him as a war hero. He surrendered in Belgrade in 2004 (Ulemek wiki). Breivik writes:

I came in contact with Serbian cultural Conservatives through the internet. This initial contact would Eventually result in my contact with several key individuals all over Europe and the forming of the group Who would pretend Establish the military order and tribunal, PCCTS Knights Templar [...] I met withthem for the first time in London and leaves on two occasions in Balticum. I had the privilege of meeting one of the greatest living war heroes of Europe at the time, a Serbian crusader and war hero WHO had killed many Muslims in battle. Due two EU persecution for alleged crimes against Muslims he was living at one point in Liberia. In visited him in Monrovia once, just before the founding session in London, 2002 (Breivik, 2011: 1379).

Here we may have found the key to Breivik's development. Breivik writes about the Serbian network and that he was initiated into the secret Knights Templar of a Serbian war hero (who was then in exile in Liberia), which was represented by him at the constitutive meeting in London 2002. It appears likely that this war hero was Ulemek or one of his closest. Breivik mentions elsewhere Ulemeks heroism:

If we had executed let's say, 100,000 Marxist Intellectuals in Western Europe after WW2 and banned all forms of Marxist doctrine we could have prevented the creation of the anti-European hate ideology known as multiculturalism. It's absolutely essential That we, the cultural conservative patriots of Europe do not repeat this mistake again [...] Patriotic militias must create and update execution lists containing the names of every single parliament arian, journalist, NGO leader / board member and university lecturer / professor etc . who has supported and propagated multi culturalist doctrines [...] The biggest threat two an effective and Thorough lynching campaign is the temptation two commence the de portation of Muslims. This is why the lynching force should only Contain soldiers under professional leadership with the given «unofficial and clandestine" mandate. An illustration [...] The Serb Volunteer Guard - SDG was a volunteer paramilitary unit [10,000 but] Founded and led by Željko Ražnatović, Widely known as Arkan [Second in command: Colonel Nebojsa Djordjevic Suca and Milorad Ulemek] [...] The Albanian Muslims in Serbia refused deportation and convertion from Islam (and instead started armed resistance) and as suchlike were targeted for annihilation (ibid: 1276-77).

If Ulemek really have played a role Breivik "Templars", it is likely that the Russian at the London meeting in 2002 may have been the former GRU officer and Major General Vladimir Filin (Scott, 2011). He stood close Ulemek and had ties to the Russian mob. From 2000 he was vice president of the company Far West LLC, which has been described by Peter Dale Scott: "In fact, Ulemek was said two havebeen so close to Filin, that Far West was 'Threatened' by Ulemek's (Legija's) imprisonments» ( Scott, 2005, 2010). According to Scott was Far West created in 1998 by former GRU officers who had worked with heroin in western Afghanistan in the 1980s. As with Ulemek said Far West to have been deeply involved in the heroin trade, and the company is also said to have been a major player in the arms trade in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, the Caucasus and in Colombia. Filin, who was central to the Ukrainian intelligence service, is said to have both Ukrainian, British and Serbian passports. His activity in Georgia 2003-2004 should have been funded by Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR / Halliburton) in collaboration with the CIA. He helped Georgia's (and Israel) attack on South Ossetia in 2008. Far West constituted a front for an Eastern European-Central Asian network with ties to, inter alia, American, British, Israeli, Turkish and Saudi intelligence (ibid). The Belarusian opposition politician Mikhail Reshetnikov says Breivik three times has been in Belarus and visited a paramilitary training camp owned by a Russian and former GRU officer, now Dutchman, Valery Lunev.

Belarussian authorities confirm that Breivik was in Minsk in March 2005. He is said to have been called "Viking" within the intelligence. Of the other two cases, Breivik have been in the country on false passports and received large sums to finance their activity (Mamchur, 2011). If Breivik got this kind of paramilitary training, it should be able to explain his brutality during the events on Utøya. But Valery Lunev was simultaneously president of the company Far West's Dubai office and colleague Filin from western Afghanistan. Lunev said to have been involved in the coup in Georgia in 1991, the civil war in Tajikistan and is said to have cooperated with the radical right organization The gray wolves (in Turkey), which has operated for the CIA with an important role for heroin trade via Turkey. Thurs the 2nd Far West-generals and GRU officers from western Afghanistan, Anton Surikov from Georgia with Turkish and American passports, and Russlan Saidov from Dagistan with Turkish passports, have the same ties to the CIA and the gray wolves. Saidov said to have been the intelligence chief of the Chechen president and had ties to the Saudi intelligence chief Prince Turki bin Feisal, while Surikov worked with his colleague, the Saudi arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi, who was deeply involved in the Iran-Contra affair, with Israel's Shimon Peres for deliveries to Iran and the whitewash of money via Antigua.

Surikov was suspected of having contributed to the bombings against residential blocks in Moscow on 9 and 13 September 1999 (when 213 people were killed and 450 were injured). Far West is said to have been owned by 13 percent of the former Cheney-controlled military company KBR / Halliburton and by 37 percent by Prince Turki bin Feisal. General Filin and general Saidov said to have controlled 25 percent each, but the company is run in practice of Saidov, Filin and Lunov, of Breivik's possible contacts. Far West consists of agents from the Baltic States, Belarus, Ukraine, Georgia, Chechnya and Uzbekistan and of an Israeli-American-Saudi-British-Turkish network for geopolitical transformation, intelligence, arms and drug trafficking (Scott, 2005). This network is, according to Peter Dale Scott continuation of scandal bank BCCI, which operated with the transfer of money for arms and drug trafficking via Antigua in the West Indies. Breivik writes about his activity in 2005-2007:

[I was] Managing Director of E-Commerce Group AS [...] This was a front (milking cow) with the purpose of financing resistance / liberation related military operations. The company was successful manager and staff most of the funds were channelled through a Caribbean Subsidiary (with base in Antigua, a location where European countries do not have access): Brentwood Solutions Limited with bank accounts in other Caribbean nations and Eastern Europe. E-Commerce Group was terminated in 2007 while most of the funds were channelled in an "unorthodox overpowers» to Norway available to the coming intellectual and Subsequent operations phase (Breivik, 2011: 1399).

Police have claimed that in 2007 it was transferred 624,000 kroner to Breivik's bank accounts (Buanes, 2011). Breivik says to the police that he had six million to finance the attack, and writes that he used banks in Antigua: According Lippestad Breivik partly explained about traveled extensively to over twenty countries worldwide [...] [It is] talking about travel directly related to the planning of the attacks, which were most intense in recent years. In earlier questioning Breivik explained that he had six million to finance terrorist attacks (Kvilesjø and Tollersrud, 2011).

One can not ignore the fact that the contacts that Breivik talking about, found only in Breivik's own imagination, he is only a dreamer who has performed the operation entirely alone and that his talk about traveling and millions are pure nonsense. But how he succeeded in carrying out such a brutal operation without professional support? How has he been able to obtain material for carrying out attacks without having any known permissions? Whence he got the 624 000 NOK which was placed on his bank accounts in 2007? How has it been possible for him to write a 1500 page manifesto, partly on good English, sometimes in less good English without having written anything before? 100 pages or maybe more are copied from anti-jihadist Web sites, and some pages are copied from the so called Una-bomber, but what about the others?

How has it been possible to create a video that is so similar to certain other anti-jihad films in content, technique and aesthetics, without there being any connection? Where did the knowledge of banking partners via Antigua? And why he indicates that there are others who have made the decision about the timing of the operation? There are some who suggest that Breivik's attack was not a purely solo initiatives.

We have discussed the right-wing Israeli and Jewish-Christian side of Breivik's network, Israeli interests in disciplining Norway and Israeli celebration of bomb attacks. Breivik's attack appears here as a new King David Hotel operation: on 22 July. But despite this explanation may seem logical, explanation may be the opposite. Perhaps the operation was a Saudi response to an Israeli game? Far West is located at the intersection between Israeli and Saudi intelligence, but it is dominated by the Saudis. If Far West whatsoever has played some role for Breivik, there is reason to take a closer look at the Saudis' search conflict with the Israelis.

In this photo taken by Vergard M. Aas, a Norwegian crime reporter who responded to the scene of a mass shooting on Utoya Island, Norway, victims lie near the shoreline approximately one hour after police say a man dressed as a police officer gunned down youths as they ran and even swam for their lives at a camp which was organized by the youth wing of the ruling Labor Party, Friday July 22, 2011. Police say the suspect in this shooting set off a fatal explosion hours earlier in the Norwegian capital of Oslo. (AP/Presse 3.0, Vegard M. Aas)

Only hours before Anders Behring Breivik began shooting children on Utøya, the police emergency squad concluded an exercise where they practiced an almost identical situation.

…

Four days in advance, and also the same Friday the attack was carried out, the police special unit trained on an ongoing terror campaign that was approximately equal to the situation that hours later, met the 22 police officers within the emergency squad on Utøya.

…

As far as Aftenposten has been informed, the training transcended directly into what the policed then faced in the Tyrifjord that very day; a mobile terror attack, in which one or more perpetrators only goal was to shoot as many people as possible and then shoot the police when they arrived.

…

Only 26 minutes after the emergency squad’s training had concluded, the car bomb went off in the government quarter. The Emergency Squad arrived early on the scene.

At 3.30PM, the staff at the Oslo police learned about a shooting at Utøya. They put so much trust in the the message, that the emergency squad entered the cars, already positioned in the government quarter and cars that came from the police station at Grønland in Oslo.

On the way they had problems contacting the North Buskerud Police District, but at 6.02PM, six minutes before they arrived, they established contact and agreed to meet at Storøya.

Breivik was a curious thing - a Zio-Nazi - a mindset not understood by the world and that's the way those that ordered this arrest want it to stay.

Right from the onset, or actually since 5 months before the terror, I've referred to his kind as 'national zionists'.

The NDL — Norwegian Defence League — that Norwegian secret police PST helped to set up and found, announced a demo in Oslo in January/February of 2011. And in this debate, I analysed NDL's (and Breivik's) ideology, and found it to be 'national zionist'.

A sort of self-deceptive nationalism that really serves most a foreign power and a foreign culture, but mixed in with local screams for purity etc, to lure the working-class, football supporter types into this madness.

PS: I recently watched the Pink Floyd movie «The Wall» again. And in the scenes where racist thugs smashed immigrant shops and restaurants in England, I thought that when I saw it in my youth, I never imagined these future thugs would be pro-zionist thugs. Amazing.

One would think it was impossible to determine who and what Anders Behring Breivik is and who his clients were and are, but we have no evidence. The mind these forces one in the direction of pointing in the usual compass direction one is forced to take every time a terrorist incident must be investigated and attempted understood. Straight into the intricacies of the secret services. Shining Pole. We must see in which direction these services attempting attention, and what tools they have available, and sufficient power over, to undertake this task. A task that is about to deceive the Norwegian people roll around.

The lone wolf

The lone terrorist, or the lone wolf, has become the favorite of the secret services. It's no wonder, for the lone wolf is a tool they can pull out of the hat every time they need him. One of the most brilliant points with the lone wolf is no PST or other monitoring programs in retrospect can be accused of not having revealed to him before he committed the terrorist act. For it is quite impossible to reveal these lone wolves. They have no network, so there is no monitoring. They never talk to anyone about their plans, so no one can tell the police about them. Are they just decided enough, they can carry out their actions without interference from anyone. Everyone knows this. The lone wolf is in the whole unstoppable. That's why it's the perfect scapegoat for the secret services and police. No one can retrospectively with conviction accused of not having discovered his plans in time to stop him. This notwithstanding, manages the secret services and the police using their own planted people in the national prostitute, the political parties, the police and the courts to use the threat of just coming loners to tighten freedom Norwegian residents mistakenly believe is secured through the same organs. Permissions to monitor Kari and Ola are dealt over a low shoes, and they presstituerte used to convince the citizens of each country about the necessity of increased monitoring, the arming of the police, tighter weapons regulations etc. Here's an example from Aftenposten 6 October 2011:

The then PST chief Janne Kristiansen received already in October 2011 yelled to another 44 million to monitor Kari and John Doe.
My comment, not the original caption of the article: The then PST chief Janne Kristiansen received already in October 2011 yelled to another 44 million to monitor Kari and John Doe.
NOK 20 million extra on your budget allows PST can invest in an advanced search engine for the Internet.

The national budget, the Government proposes a total increase of NOK Police Security Service (PS) with 46.44 million crowns.

Focus online

Almost half of the funds, NOK 20 million, earmarked for an advanced search engine that will do PST better to get an overview of what is happening on the Internet.

NOK 10 million will be used to strengthen bodyguard service.
NOK 20 million to do that PST can invest in an advanced search engine for open networks.
NOK 9.4 million will go to increased surveillance capacity.
7,040,000 million, full-year impact of eight new FTEs from 2011.
Better monitoring online

PST has received strong criticism in the wake of the 22 July. Only three days after the terrorist attacks that killed 77 people went PST chief Janne Kristiansen out and said that terror accused Anders Behring Breivik (32) was a "lone wolf" who could not be detected.

Although Behring Breivik had bought 6,000 kg of fertilizer, had three guns and vigorously debated and came with nationalist views on right-wing extremist online forums, the PST admitted that they did not know who 32-year-old was. Nor by putting the information together, he could be detected, according to the security services.

- He has performed so cynical, cold, cruel and calculating that he has managed to go under our radar. This is not even solo terrorism. This is a lone wolf, one that runs under all radars, said PST chief Janne Kristiansen said in an interview with Aftenposten 25 July.

Here you see just what I'm trying get ahead. They say with one part of the cracked tongue that the lone wolf is one that goes under the radar, one they can not possibly reveal, for the second, to communicate with the other half of ophioglossum vulgatum that only they get enough money, and politicians give them authority to to monitor residents in Norway, it will suffice in some way help anyway. This nonsense reader gets indiscriminately served by one of the foremost representatives of the presstituerte in Norway, not particularly glorious Aftenposten. A sharp weapon to shoot himself through the fog wall They presstituerte and authorities have set up to protect their own crimes, the book Gro gate of Setsaas and Ramm, which can be downloaded in Ingrid's enhanced version in PDF form here. The secret services can not function without the courts, they presstituerte, police management, political parties and other powerful bodies is part of it. They are one and the same, and so it must be. Everything was built up of banking oligarchs in the last century, which besides wish for a surveillance society in order to consolidate his own omnipotence, needed a tool to make themselves invisible.

The great contradiction

By willingly help from The presstituerte did Anders Behring Breivik a lone wolf, but equally important is that they also created an image of an irresolute mom s girl as the few times he dared drop hem of mother, sitting at home in his bedroom in the orphanage and played war games on the Internet. So the paradox. I do not know why they presstituerte in Norway has revealed this. They may have done it accidentally, perhaps thought that it did not matter, or they may have been pressured into it, because it has been rewritten abroad and by bloggers, and thus would come to light for most anyway. A third possible reason is that they serve us disinformation. It's about Anders Behring Breivik's trip to China, former Soviet Union countries, Yugoslavia and Liberia. It is also about the German disclosure of Anders Behring Breivik who arrested arms dealer. Here we have thus a irresolute toddler who besides hang in mommy's skirt, acting as the purest James Bond. Let's take a look at his 007-exploits. From ABCNyheter 14th January 2016:

Norwegian authorities did not know about that Breivik was taken in Germany with weapons
The mass murderer shall in 2009 have been stopped during a routine control in Germany with weapons parts and ammunition. It was not reported to the Norwegian police, claims German documentary filmmaker.

When officers went through the car they have found both ammunition and weapon parts, but information on this should therefore not have been passed on to Norwegian police.

In addition, he should have seen documents relating Breivik to purchase weapons in Southeast Europe.

There are not any among ordinary Norwegian non-mammadalter who takes on the job of smuggling weapons, weapons parts and ammunition from Eastern Europe to Western Europe, possibly Norway. At a declared mom s girl do it is nothing less than sensational. Are hardly better off he went to Liberia, one of the world's most dangerous countries for buying blood diamonds. For all excess during one of the bloody civil wars there. There was another Breivik represented not only through a subdivision / NGO of the United Nations, but probably the Norwegian secret services and / or foreign service. Remember that Anders Behring Breivik's father Jens David Breivik was in the Foreign Service, including with Torgeir Hagen, who later became Chief of Defence E-service.

WFP forced to limp dry food distribution in Western Liberia
REPORT
from the World Food Programme

Published on 10 Oct 1996
The World Food Programme has stopped distributing dry food rations in parts of strife-torn Liberia Because of fear of attack by faction fighters on the civilian population, leaving tens of thousands of hungry people without food.
"The fighters harass the civilians, stealing food and any other commodities They have," said Arnt Breivik, WFP's Country Director in Liberia. "We are worried about the security of our beneficiaries." Last month, WFP and its partners had distributed two-week rations two almost 40,000 hungry people in Tubmanburg and Cape Mount county. However, recipients had Become targets of faction fighters.As a result, WFP, the United Nation's food aid agency, is now only engaged in limited targetted wet-feeding programs - where the food is cooked and then given two people on the spot - in Tubmanburg and Cape Mount County. WFP food is now only reaching about 2,500 people in These areas. "Manager and staff we are very Concerned about the Malnutrition levels in These parts of Liberia, we can not put these people at risk," Mr. Breivik said.
Wed, September 28, fighters attacked the town of Sinje, in Cape Mount County, killing some 21 civilians, mostly women and children.

"Even the people themelves garden Asked us to stop giving themselve food Because They are afraid," Mr. Breivik said.

As far as I've found out was Arnt Breivik there for a few years before he possibly was stationed in Sudan. I do not know who he is, but the main thing is that Anders Behring Breivik was in Liberia in 2002, and he came from Ivory Coast on their way to Africa, here according to Dagbladet on March 2, 2012:

Dagbladet are told that Breivik testified that he traveled on from Ivory Coast to Liberia in 2002, where he claims he was in two to three weeks. Where he claims that he met a Serb "war hero". To enter the country told Breivik that he had to bribe several officials before he finally came to the capital Monrovia. Breivik claims he bluffed themselves by saying that he worked for UNICEF.

Three years later he applied for a visa to China, and got this granted.

By Mark Hughes, and Gordon Rayner 9:30PM BST 25 Jul 2011
Breivik was understood to have met leaders of the EDL in March last year when he came to London for the visit of Geert Wilders, the Dutch Right-wing politician. Daryl Hobson, who organises EDL demonstrations, said Breivik, who told police there were “two more cells” ready to follow him, had met members of the group.
Another senior member of the EDL said Breivik had been in regular contact with its members via Facebook, and had a “hypnotic” effect on them.
Scotland Yard was investigating Breivik’s claims that he began his deadly “crusade” after being recruited to a secret society in London, and that he was guided by an English “mentor”. David Cameron, who was being kept updated on developments, said Breivik’s claims were being taken “extremely seriously”.
Breivik wrote of having strong links with the EDL, saying he had met its leaders and had 600 EDL members as Facebook friends.
Mr Hobson said in an online posting that: “He had about 150 EDL on his list … bar one or two doubt the rest of us ever met him, altho [sic] he did come over for one of our demo [sic] in 2010 … but what he did was wrong. RIP to all who died as a result of his actions.”

Another senior member of the EDL, who spoke to The Daily Telegraph on condition of anonymity, said he understood Breivik had met EDL leaders when he came to Britain to hear Wilders speak in London last year.
“I spoke to him a few times on Facebook and he is extremely intelligent and articulate and very affable,” said the source. “He is someone who can project himself very well and I presume there would be those within the EDL who would be quite taken by that. It’s like Hitler, people said he was hypnotic. This guy had the same sort of effect.”
The source said Breivik began making friend requests with EDL members on Facebook in 2009 and knew “three or four” people in the group.
Breivik told his Facebook friends he would be coming to London for Wilders’s visit. “I remember he [Breivik] was on Facebook saying that he felt he had to come over. Maybe he thought it was the only chance he’d get to come to a big demo,” said the source.
“Geert Wilders was a high-profile anti-Islamic politician, coming to Britain. Everyone was raving about it.
“He [Breivik] was obviously in contact with some of us. If this bloke was coming all the way from Norway the leadership would have wanted to meet him.
“If there is someone who can put themselves across in an articulate way about the radicalisation and Islamisation of Europe then people at the top of the EDL are very welcoming.”
Breivik compiled a 1,518-page manifesto, written entirely in English under his Anglicised name, Andrew Berwick, in which he made repeated references to his British links and in particular his links to the EDL.
“I used to have more than 600 EDL members as Facebook friends and have spoken with tens of EDL members and leaders,” he wrote. “In fact, I was one of the individuals who supplied them with processed ideological material (including rhetorical strategies) in the very beginning.”
He also suggested that one of two English extremists who attended a founding meeting of the Knights Templar in London in April 2002 might have been a member of the EDL. “I wonder sometimes if one of the EDL founders was one of the co-founders of PCCTS,” he wrote. “I guess I’ll never know for sure.”
Breivik also wrote about an English “mentor” he named only as “Richard”.
Another alleged member of the EDL, Katie Hedderick, posted a comment on an online message board that suggested she had come across Breivik. She wrote: “OMG [Oh my God] … HIM?! He wrote some books and did talks didn’t he?”
The EDL had stated on its website that it had no links to Breivik. Stephen Lennon, the leader of the group, was unavailable for comment on the claims, but the EDL said journalists could attend a press conference with him on Tuesday if they paid a £50 fee.
Lennon, 28, of Luton, Beds, was convicted of using threatening, abusive or insulting behaviour by magistrates yesterday over a street brawl involving 100 football fans.
He was sentenced to a 12-month community rehabilitation order, 150 hours of unpaid work and banned from football grounds for three years._________________www.rethink911.orgwww.patriotsquestion911.comwww.actorsandartistsfor911truth.orgwww.mediafor911truth.orgwww.pilotsfor911truth.orgwww.mp911truth.orgwww.ae911truth.orgwww.rl911truth.orgwww.stj911.orgwww.l911t.comwww.v911t.orgwww.thisweek.org.ukwww.abolishwar.org.ukwww.elementary.org.ukwww.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot vote in polls in this forumYou cannot attach files in this forumYou cannot download files in this forum