timeodanaos wrote:Isn't lavo used as a deponent when conveying a medial voice?

Lavare "used as a deponent" doesn't quite make sense. Perhaps you mean, in passive voice, lavari that is, which does, as you say, convey a "medial voice" similar to the Greek vox media. So you could say "lavor," sure.

timeodanaos wrote:Isn't lavo used as a deponent when conveying a medial voice?

Lavare "used as a deponent" doesn't quite make sense. Perhaps you mean, in passive voice, lavari that is, which does, as you say, convey a "medial voice" similar to the Greek vox media. So you could say "lavor," sure.

Since the conjugation is passive though the meaning isn't, I thought it more proper to call it a deponent paradigm - in this specific case at least. I'm sorry I wasn't making myself clear, I hate to sound like someone who doesn't know what he's saying - especially when I, in fact, do.

I meant to merely enquire about the specific case of lavo/lavor, where I know of the use with passive voice denoting medial action, but not of dir. object + indirect object.