On 6/26/12 10:06 AM, Barry Norton wrote:
>
> Doesn't have anything to do with the means of access control, does it?
>
> These are people who, given the option to secure their updates, have
> chosen to disregard it and post them publicly.
Users you opt out of default privacy settings rather than being to told
to opt-in as an after thought :-)
We are looking at the same old "cat and mouse" game re. "you" the
product and free social media services. Service providers need to pay
for those massive data centers that drive their social media services,
at the same time, they dare not price these services at anything greater
than $0.00.
Kingsley
>
> Barry
>
>
>
> On 26/06/2012 14:57, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> On 6/26/12 9:49 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>>> http://www.weknowwhatyouredoing.com/
>> Not when data spaces are WebID ACL protected :-)
>>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen