This copy is for your personal non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies of Toronto Star content for distribution to colleagues, clients or customers, or inquire about permissions/licensing, please go to: www.TorontoStarReprints.com

The probe by House Republicans suggested that command leaders shaped analysis in a way that resulted in more positive depictions of the war.

Intelligence assessments approved by senior leaders at U.S. Central Command exaggerated the progress of anti-terrorism efforts they ran against Daesh, a House Republican task force said in an initial report released Aug. 11. (Karim Kadim / The Associated Press File Photo)

By Missy RyanThe Washington Post

Thu., Aug. 11, 2016

An investigation by House Republicans has found that the U.S. military’s Central Command regularly produced intelligence that distorted the results of the campaign against Daesh (also known as ISIS or ISIL), suggesting that command leaders shaped analysis in a way that resulted in a more upbeat depiction of the war.

Interim conclusions from a joint panel including Republicans from the House Armed Services, Intelligence and Appropriations committees found that assessments produced by Centcom’s intelligence unit routinely differed during 2014-2015 from the judgments of senior career analysts there. The investigation relied on survey results and interviews with Centcom personnel.

The intelligence reports examined by lawmakers “also consistently described U.S. actions in a more positive light than other assessments from the [intelligence community] and were typically more optimistic than actual events warranted,” the investigation found.

The probe stems from an internal complaint by a civilian intelligence analyst who alleged that intelligence from Centcom, which is responsible for military operations in the Middle East, was being improperly distorted. The Pentagon’s inspector general’s office is conducting a separate investigation into the issue.

Cmdr. Kyle Raines, a spokesman for Centcom, said the command had seen the report but declined to comment while other investigations were continuing.

Article Continued Below

According to the panel’s report, a new intelligence director arrived at Centcom only days before the Daesh overran the Iraqi city of Mosul in June 2014, revealing the extent of the militant group’s strength and the calamitous state of Iraq’s army. That coincided with other changes in the intelligence production process at Centcom that, according to the report, allowed senior officials to make significant changes to analytic conclusions by their subordinates. As that reorganization process took place, according to those interviewed by the panel, analysts were pressured by their superiors to hew their conclusions more closely to reporting coming from the battlefield.

One outcome of that may have been overly rosy depictions of Iraq’s security forces, which the United States and its partners have been working to retrain since their partial collapse during the seizure of Mosul, the report suggested. Many of the changes to Centcom’s intelligence process highlighted in the report have since been abandoned, it found.

According to the Republican lawmakers, public statements from Defense Department leaders were also regularly more upbeat than the intelligence and ground situation warranted. After struggling during the first year of the military campaign in Iraq and Syria, U.S. military leaders now say they have seized the momentum against the Daesh. Officials have not said exactly when the offensive to recapture Mosul will start, but it could be as early as this fall.

The panel also suggested that Centcom’s analysis of the situation in Iraq and Syria may have shaped policy-makers’ understanding of the facts at senior levels of the U.S. government. That allegation is rejected by Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee, who conducted a separate review that was also released Thursday.

“We found no evidence of politicization of intelligence in this case,” the panel’s ranking Democrat, Rep. Adam B. Schiff, California, said in a statement. “Nor did we — or the majority — find any evidence that the White House requested to, or in any manner attempted to, have the intelligence analysis conform to any preset or political narrative.”

The Democratic lawmakers did find, however, that the Centcom process during that period was “overly insular” and failed to sufficiently account for dissenting analysis.

The Republican lawmakers suggested much of the blame lay on Centcom leaders at that time, saying that the intelligence process worked better under commanders that preceded and followed Lloyd Austin III, the general who served as commander from 2013 to 2016. Austin could not be immediately reached for comment.

More from the Toronto Star & Partners

LOADING

Copyright owned or licensed by Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or distribution of this content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited and/or its licensors. To order copies of Toronto Star articles, please go to: www.TorontoStarReprints.com