Why did bolsheviks win civil war

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the Bolsheviks win the Civil War? The Bolsheviks had successfully negotiated peace with Germany, and Russia's role in the First World War had come to an end when the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk was signed in March 1917. They could not however, avoid a civil war in Russia. The Bolsheviks were made to fight for control of the country. The Russian Civil War took place between the summer of 1918 until the beginning of 1921. During this period the Bolsheviks faced huge opposition to their rule in the form of the White Armies, which were led by the former officers of the Tsarist State, and also from the intervention by the forces of foreign countries. Even though the Bolsheviks had limited control outside of central and wester Russia they still managed a complete victory and therefore the establishment of Russian Communism went ahead unchallenged. This essay will address the factors and strengths the Bolsheviks had in turn with the 'Whites' weaknesses that enabled them to win the Civil War. Although the Bolsheviks had limited control outside of central and western Russia, it was these areas that were the most important, as they included the cities Petrograd and Moscow, with Moscow now the new capital city of Russia. ...read more.

Middle

Trotsky became Commissar for war in the Bolshevik government. He was a great improvisor and had excellent organisational skills. He created the Red Army from the Red Guards and from the remnants of the old Tsarist army; this army was much better organised than the White Armies who were made up of different groups, who had entirely different aims and beliefs and no one person was in charge of the White forces. Whereas the Bolsheviks had Lenin, the Whites had several rival people in charge, such as Yudenich, Kolchak and Denikin, who were all vying for control. They were all ambitious men and each was determined to take control for Russia for himself. Co-operation between these leaders was difficult as they could not agree on whether they were fighting for monarchism, republicanism or for the Constituent Assembly. These different opinions meant that the Whites had little chance of developing a coordinated military strategy, as often the White generals would not work together because they did not like or trust each other and they were all suspicious of each others motives. As a result, there was virtually no cooperation between the various White Armies as they fought independently, making it easier for the Red Army to defeat each of them individually. ...read more.

Conclusion

In this way, support for the Bolsheviks was organised and built up successfully. The Bolsheviks were also handed a propaganda coup in the form of the intervention if foreign forces, which should've have worked in the Whites favour but didn't because it allowed the Bolsheviks to portray themselves as defenders of Russian soil against foreign invaders. Having a successful propaganda campaign enabled the Bolsheviks to receive large amounts of support from the peasants, which would be crucial since they supplied the main body of the soldiers. Lenin used successful propaganda to gain the support of the peasants who otherwise had little love for either side but the peasants would also have been more inclines to support the Bolsheviks as Lenin had legitimised their right to lands, whereas the Whites made it clear that the land would be restored to its former owners. By the end of the Civil War in 1921 the Bolsheviks had succeeded in securing their grip on power in Russia and the White Armies and foreign powers fighting in Russia had been defeated. The Bolsheviks were able to win the Civil War because they were in a well placed located that enabled them to be organised in unity, under good leadership, which used propaganda to maintain large amounts of support.1 1 Sabaah Gulbar LV2 Sabaah Gulbar LV2 ...read more.

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

Furthermore, it would also seem irresponsible for the government to simply hand over half a million dollars worth of gold to a terrorist organization, without stopping them in anyway. After one hostage taken by a terrorist organization is kidnapped and murdered 7 days later, to the minute, it would only

On the other side, the causes of the quarrel were primarily and apparently political, ultimately and really religious, and thus the elements of resistance in Parliament and the nation were at first confused, and, later, strong and direct. Democracy, moderate republicanism, and the simple desire for constitutional guarantees could hardly

The coalition expended great efforts to annul the social legislation that had been passed in the previous years, especially in agrarian reform. During this time, there were general strikes in Valencia and Zaragoza, street conflicts in Madrid and Barcelona,

his own conduct in other respects, and it is one of the points where I have found myself in painful disagreement.?[13] Subsequently, in 1916 the collaborative agreement between the INC and the Muslim League, the Lucknow Pact, aimed to give the Indian people more authority in the running of their own country.

their job and their perks for life.?[32] Brezhnev allowed farmers to work on state own plots which motivated them to produce as much as possible in order to sell the surplus[33]. This, in theory, should have been beneficial and shows that Brezhnev was trying to improve the economy through new methods however, he was not so lucky.

common belief was that ?apathy, defeatism and resentment are spreading fast in Nationalist ranks, causing surrenders and desertion.? The GMD?s army was fast losing soldiers, and with the party in this state it was only too easy for the CCP to take advantage of the situation.

an image of fear that fueled the Spartan supremacy for many years. Though this belief in ?to conquer or die? [15] created a fearful image of Spartans it also led to imminent defeat as they entered battle with few well-trained Spartiates and consequently suffered heavy causalities and loss.

later nicknamed Auletes. When Caesar arrived in Egypt in 48BC, he was pursuing Pompey, who had fled there after his defeat at Pharsalus. Auletes owed his throne to Rome, specifically Caesar and Pomepy, through whose good graces he ruled. During Caesar's consulship in 59 BC, the king had guaranteed his