ObamaCare Is Collectivized Healthcare

In an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal, Dr. Lloyd M. Krieger argues that while the Republicans in Congress are right to seek the repeal or defunding of ObamaCare, “the law has already yielded profound, destructive changes that will not be undone by repeal or defunding alone.” These changes, he says, can only be reversed by “active steps and new laws.”

Krieger, a plastic surgeon who invests in healthcare companies, sees the primary danger in ObamaCare as “a wave of frantic consolidation in the healthcare industry.” He points out that ObamaCare’s mandates have already forced major changes in both health insurance and medical practice.

“Doctors and hospitals, meanwhile, have decided that they cannot survive unless they achieve massive size — and fast,” Krieger writes. The New York Times reported in November that “there is a growing frenzy of mergers involving hospitals, clinics and doctor groups eager to share costs and savings, and cash in on the incentives” in the healthcare law. Krieger specifically cites the fact that more than two thirds of U.S. medical practices were owned by doctors just six years ago, yet “by next year, nearly two-thirds [of doctors] will be salaried employees of larger institutions.” A big part of the problem is that under ObamaCare, new physician-owned hospitals are prohibited from coming into existence, and existing ones cannot expand without meeting “stringent conditions,” according to USA Today.

The obvious purpose of all this is to herd all doctors, hospitals, and patients into a limited number of large, easily controlled healthcare cartels — “collectivization,” as Krieger puts it. With “far fewer individual insurers, doctors, hospitals, device makers, drug manufacturers, nursing homes and other health-care players to resist” changes in healthcare policy, he avers, “government bureaucrats will be able to impose controls with much greater ease.”

Krieger has no doubt as to what kinds of controls are in store:

There is little mystery how the government will exercise its power. Choices will be limited. Pathways to expensive specialist care such as advanced radiology and surgery will decline. Cutting-edge devices and medicines will come into the system much more slowly and be used much less frequently.

This is, of course, the universal experience with socialized medicine, from Canada to Great Britain to Cuba.

Defunding the enforcement of ObamaCare is insufficient to prevent America from going down the same destructive path, Krieger maintains. All the consolidation in the healthcare industry — undoubtedly one of the main reasons the big insurance companies, healthcare providers, and pharmaceutical manufacturers backed the healthcare bill — means that “limits on treatment choices are already becoming hardwired into the system,” he says. “Lawmakers must take concrete steps to stop and reverse this.”

Oddly, Krieger does not recommend full-scale repeal of ObamaCare but rather a “line-by-line” review of the law “to remove all of the disincentives for medical practices, hospitals and others to remain smaller and independent.” If the law were simply repealed, however, all of these new disincentives would disappear. That would still leave in place many older policies that encourage consolidation — policies which themselves ought to be amended or repealed — but it would at least be a good start.

Krieger does make some good suggestions as to how to improve the healthcare system, many of which would apply even if ObamaCare were repealed: instituting tax policies to help smaller insurers and providers stave off consolidation; “unwinding all the rules ... designed to increase overhead to the point that only massive and easily regulated provider organizations can survive”; “limiting the power of government agencies to determine what care gets funded”; and “re-establishing [consumer] choice at all levels of the system,” including allowing the purchase of insurance across state lines and offering “tax breaks for people who purchase medical care not covered by their insurance, so there is reasonable chance of escaping government-imposed limits on treatment choices.”

Collectivization is the essence of both communism and fascism. It certainly has no place in a free, constitutional republic. Patients and doctors, not government or its collaborators in the corporate world, should be making decisions about healthcare. ObamaCare ought to be expunged, followed in short order by Medicare, Medicaid, and the rest of the federal healthcare monstrosity, lest the United States go the way of the Soviet Union and the Third Reich.

Please review our Comment Policy before posting a comment

Thank you for joining the discussion at The New American. We value our readers and encourage their participation, but in order to ensure a positive experience for our readership, we have a few guidelines for commenting on articles. If your post does not follow our policy, it will be deleted.

No profanity, racial slurs, direct threats, or threatening language.

No product advertisements.

Please post comments in English.

Please keep your comments on topic with the article. If you wish to comment on another subject, you may search for a relevant article and join or start a discussion there.

Comments that we consider abusive, spammy, off-topic, or harassing will be removed.

If our filtering system detects that you may have violated our policy, your comment will be placed in a queue for moderation. It will then be either approved or deleted. Once your comment is approved, it will then be viewable on the discussion thread.

If you need to report a comment, please flag it and it will be reviewed. Thank you again for being a valued reader of The New American.