It has become obvious that the Chiefs will pass on a QB with the top pick and will address the QB need (a) later in round 1, (b) in round 2, or (c) by signing a veteran. No trade down is planned either.

There seems to be the following three names on top of the draft. Among these three which one would you want the Chiefs to use their 1st pick on:

1- LT Luke Joekel (meaning Albert will walk)

2- DE Star Lotulelei (meaning T-Jax will be cut)

3- Jarvis Jones (meaning we are thinking transition to 43 soon)

4- Other (name and explain)

KEEP IN MIND

This is not a Geno Smith, Tyler Wilson discussion. Keep that argument in the hundreds of other threads about it. This is about IF WE DON'T PICK A QB AT THE TOP! Just curious to know which of the picks mentioned makes more sense compared to the others IYO. If you are a staunch Geno fan, for example, this does not paint you as a traitor to the cause.

Apparently you haven't been to NFL Network street, because they have him going #1.

Why do they have him going #1? Why do you care?

I don't give a shit what the NFL Network thinks because their job is to be "right". Mayock was Aaron Curry's biggest fan and he was "right" but Curry sucked ass. I told everyone that would listen that he would suck but after he was chosen, it was irrelevant.

As I've said all along, the Combines will give all NFL fans a better idea of where players will be drafted. Smith will participate in all of the drills, so the picture should be much clearer after they're complete.

I WANT the Chiefs to draft a QB in the first round and I WANT him to succeed.

But I'm not going to concede that Reid is a failure, an idiot, afraid, etc. if that doesn't happen. And the only reason I've even linked these stories is because there is some doubt as to whether the Chiefs WILL take a QB in the first round.

****, I pushed for Ryan. I pushed hard for Sanchez. I wasn't here last year but I would have given up every pick in 2012 for RGIII. I am in no way, shape or form against taking a QB at 1.1. None, zip, zero.

But, the perception is that no QB is WORTH taking at 1.1.

Personally, I find this to be very, very interesting.

And i find that perception to be a bunch of smoke and mirrors bullshit. Who gives a **** about the 2012 draft???? its over. dead and gone. Time to move on and realize that there is valid talent at QB for 1.1 It is.....what it is.Posted via Mobile Device

And i find that perception to be a bunch of smoke and mirrors bullshit. Who gives a **** about the 2012 draft???? its over. dead and gone. Time to move on and realize that there is valid talent at QB for 1.1 It is.....what it is.Posted via Mobile Device

Why would a team that's chosing #1 overall need "smoke and mirrors"?

Also, WHY should ANY team consciously and deliberately avoid making comparisons to the previous draft?

Interesting, because the word on the street is that none of these QB's are truly "First round talent". Interesting, that "No QB is worth 1.1", etc.

The Chiefs can take whomever they wish at 1.1, so I don't think they're pushing this propaganda.

So it'll be interesting to see how this shakes out.

Absolutely. When it comes down to it, the Chiefs are the Chiefs. They're not the 0-16 Detroit Lions or the 1-15 Rams. They're the Chiefs, with a (presumably) re-signed Brandon Albert and two pretty solid pass rushers.

You know why? Because I've learned over the years that no matter what you think or Mecca believes or Hamas or myself, NONE of us have control over their pick. And personally, I'm OVER harassing and attempting to humiliate others with a different opinion, especially PRE-DRAFT.

Now, if you or anyone else wants to voice their opinion POST-DRAFT, I get it.

But for ****'s Sake, we're 10 weeks away and the Combine doesn't begin for another 10+ days. So all this huffing and puffing about guys that haven't done ****ing DICK is annoying.