WCS news doesn’t end nuclear waste saga

CEO: “WCS expects to go forward with this project at the earliest possible opportunity after completion of the sale”

By Jim Malewitz and Kiah Collier, Texas Tribune

Published 4:46 pm, Wednesday, April 19, 2017

Photo: Kin Man Hui /San Antonio Express-News

Image 1of/2

Caption

Close

Image 1 of 2

A caution sign stands outside the low-level radioactive waste site owned by Waste Control Specialists near Andrews, Texas.

A caution sign stands outside the low-level radioactive waste site owned by Waste Control Specialists near Andrews, Texas.

Photo: Kin Man Hui /San Antonio Express-News

Image 2 of 2

Hundreds of fortified metal casks containing low-level radioactive waste are at Waste Control Specialists’ site near Andrews, Texas on Feb. 14, 2017. The casks will be stacked on top of each other, then encased in layers of protective soil, liners, concrete and red clay. less

Hundreds of fortified metal casks containing low-level radioactive waste are at Waste Control Specialists’ site near Andrews, Texas on Feb. 14, 2017. The casks will be stacked on top of each other, then ... more

Photo: Kin Man Hui /San Antonio Express-News

WCS news doesn’t end nuclear waste saga

1 / 2

Back to Gallery

A proposal to bring the nation’s spent nuclear fuel to West Texas appears to be on the ropes.

Waste Control Specialists, which currently stores low-level radioactive waste in Andrews County, has asked the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to temporarily suspend a review of its application to store tens of thousands of metric tons of spent nuclear fuel currently scattered at reactor sites throughout the country. The Dallas-based company pitched the massive expansion as a solution to a problem that has bedeviled policymakers for decades.

The reason for the requested freeze? The company, which runs the state’s only radioactive waste dump, is bleeding cash and is struggling to find the estimated $7.5 million needed to continue the licensing process. Waste Control Specialists “is faced with a magnitude of financial burdens that currently make pursuit of licensing unsupportable,” Rod Baltzer, the company’s president and CEO, said in a letter to the federal commission dated Tuesday.

The review’s price tag caught the company off guard, Baltzer wrote.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission did not respond to a request for comment.

The request comes as EnergySolutions, a Salt Lake-city based waste company, is trying to buy Waste Control Specialists. The U.S. Department of Justice is suing to block the merger, arguing it would essentially create a monopoly on radioactive waste disposal.

“WCS expects to go forward with this project at the earliest possible opportunity after completion of the sale,” Baltzer said in a statement.

Experts call this week’s request a setback for a project that the company initially suggested it would start constructing by 2019; opponents of the plan declared the request a win for their side.

“We consider it a major victory,” said Karen Hadden of the Sustainable Energy & Economic Development Coalition, an environmental advocacy group that has opposed Waste Control Specialists’ expansion plans.

While the company’s questionable finances were a factor in its request, Hadden suggested that mounting public opposition might also have played a role. In February, Bexar County commissioners unanimously approved a resolution opposing shipment of high-level nuclear waste through the San Antonio area on its way to the site. Midland-area residents have urged local officials there to back a similar resolution.

And several longtime Andrews residents spoke out against the project in February during a public hearing held by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

“I think WCS is becoming aware that this is a bigger battle than they anticipated,” said Hadden.

Dale Klein, associate vice chancellor for research at the University of Texas System and a former Nuclear Regulatory Commission chairman under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, said the cost of obtaining a license should not have come as a shock to the company.

“There should have been a dialogue between WCS and NRC,” he said. “Having spent so much time and effort for a licensing application, it’s surprising to me that they would now claim that they were surprised by the cost to review.”

When Klein was NRC chairman, he said he saw several applicants ask for a similar pause. That resulted in a mix of outcomes — some completely abandoned the application process, but some ended up restarting it.

Either way, he said WCS now runs “the risk of losing momentum.”

The commission will probably reassign staff that had been reviewing the company’s application to other projects. So even if WCS restarts the application process, it will take months just to reassemble a team of reviewers.

“It would not be unusual to take six months to rebuild a team,” Klein said.

Waste Control Specialists has been the only company in the country officially seeking to build a temporary storage facility while the federal government grapples with finding a permanent disposal site. But this month, a New Mexico group submitted an application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to build a temporary storage facility, just across the state line from Andrews.

In a 2014 letter to his then-fellow state leaders, Rick Perry — who championed the WCS expansion as Texas governor — cited that competition as reason to move ahead with the project. He now heads the U.S. Department of Energy, which plays a major role in advancing and implementing policy on nuclear waste.