"The
whole Revolution, therefore, as a Revolution, was declared and
accomplished by the people, acting separately as individuals, and
exercising each his natural rights, and not by their governments in the
exercise of their constitutional powers.

"It
was, therefore, as individuals, and only as individuals, each acting
for himself alone, that they declared that their consent - that is,
their individual consent for each one could consent only for himself -
was necessary to the creation or perpetuity of any government that they
could rightfully be called on to support.

"What scope! What a horizon of work for the next two centuries for the best energies of the best people in the world...The
only thing feasible to carry out this idea is a secret society
gradually absorbing the wealth of the world, to be devoted to this
object." Cecil Rhodes

"In
the same way each declared, for himself, that his own will, pleasure,
and discretion were the only authorities he had any occasion to consult,
In determining whether he would any longer support the government under
which be had always lived.

And if this action of each
individual were valid and rightful when he had so many other
individuals to keep him company, it would have been, in the view of
natural justice and right, equally valid and rightful, if he had taken
the same step alone.

"He had the same natural right
to take up arms alone to defend his own property against a single
tax-gatherer, that he had to take up arms in company with three millions
of others, to defend the property of all against an army of
tax-gatherers.

"Thus
the whole Revolution turned upon, asserted, and, in theory,
established, the right of each and every man, at his discretion, to
release himself from the support of the government under which he had
lived. And this principle was asserted, not as a right peculiar to
themselves, or to that time, or as applicable only to the government
then existing; but as a universal right of all men, at all times, and
under all circumstances."

The
purpose of establishing government is solely to provide "protection".
Those who wish to be protected by a specific government must expressly
consent to be protected by choosing a domicile within the civil
jurisdiction of that specific government. Here's a great overview of
events that have led to where we are today, check out this link.

Generally,
those who have made such a choice and thereby become "customers" of the
protection afforded by government are called by any of the following
names under the civil laws of the jurisdiction they have nominated to
protect them:

--"citizens", or "residents" (aliens) if they were born within the country in which the jurisdiction is a part.

--"inhabitants", which encompasses both "citizens", and "residents" but excludes foreigners.

--"persons", or "individuals".

In law, the process of choosing a domicile within the jurisdiction of a specific government is called "animus manendi". More.

That
choice makes you a consenting party to the "civil contract", "social
compact", and "private law" that attaches to and therefore protects all
"inhabitants" and things physically situated on or within that specific
territory, venue, and jurisdiction.

At M4F, we believe the
solution to America's problems, and the planet's problems, is to restore
the balance of power to individual people. Once more people have
learned how to be free & to defend and monetize their unalienable
rights under the common law, we'll have a better chance to restore a republic of free people without resorting to collectivist political movements that can be easily co-opted.

All people have the right to choose their domicile and politiical jurisdiction

In
the year 1297, the phrase, "Law of the Land," was used in the Magna
Carta. Perhaps the most famous clause of Magna Carta states:

"No
Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or be disseised of his Freehold,
or Liberties, or free Customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or any other
wise destroyed; nor will We not pass upon him, nor condemn him, but by
lawful judgment of his Peers, or by the Law of the Land."

In
a sense then, your consent to a specific jurisdiction by your choice of
domicile within that jurisdiction is what creates the "person",
"individual", "citizen", "resident", or "inhabitant" which is the only
proper subject of the civil laws passed by that government.

A man
or woman who has not consented to the jurisdiction of the U.S. (or any
other jurisdiction) is called a "people" who is "sovereign." When he or
she is forced or coerced into commerce with the U.S. and its Franchises,
the one coercing you is in dishonor and must pay for that. That is why
you need to honorably give them notice of your Fee Schedule so they will not dishonor themselves. If they do, the schedule gives them a way to reinstate their honor.

Choosing
a domicile within a specific jurisdiction causes an implied waiver of
sovereign immunity, because the courts admit that the term "person" does
not refer to the "sovereign":

"Since in common usage, the term
person does not include the sovereign, statutes not employing the phrase
are ordinarily construed to exclude it." [United States v. Cooper
Corporation, 312 U.S. 600 (1941)]

"Sovereignty itself is, of
course, not subject to law for it is the author and source of law;"
[Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886)]

"There is no
such thing as a power of inherent Sovereignty in the government of the
United States. In this country sovereignty resides in the People, and
Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their
Constitution entrusted to it: All else is withheld." [Juilliard v.
Greenman, 110 U.S. 421 (1884)]

Those who have become
customers of government protection by choosing a civil domicile within a
specific government then owe a duty to pay for the support of the
protection they demand. The method of paying for said protection is
called "taxes". In earlier times this kind of sponsorship was called
"tribute". Both state and federal income taxation is based almost
entirely upon what is called "domicile". Domicile is a choice we make
that requires our consent and participation, and because it requires our
consent, then becoming a "taxpayer" who owes a tax requires our
consent.