Monday, December 20, 2010

I got this email today from a concerned citizen at the hak5 forum informing me that "KathrynO" had asked for help to hack into and destroy the Paul is Dead Miss Him Forum. The email in pertinent part reads as follows:

This is serious because she is breaking the law by soliciting a hacker to break into secure computer networks.

Here is what "KathrynO" posted at that link:

... Now I need help. The forum I joined concerns Paul McC, the biggest there is on this planet, and I know my stalker(s) who are also PID fraeks have been contacting the admins of this forum and are talking about me. I need to be able to get access to these conversations and maybe if all else fails get this forum destroyed also... Thanks guys, KathrynO

Needless to say, no one is stalking this woman. However, it is true that a number of people have contacted me about her stalking them.

At any rate, should someone hack the PID Miss Him forum, then we will know who is behind it and can take appropriate action.

UPDATE: Kathryn O'Connor of Detroit admitted she had ProBoards delete the Paul is Dead Miss Him forum. But never fear. There is a new PID MH forum here. Please join us!

The PID, Beatles, & the 60's discussion starts at about 20 minutes in.[Please support this blog ~ click on the ad links. Thanks!]

UPDATE: Comments from guest blogger, Getsmart, about the show:

[Note] that Tina Foster's arrival on the show is at minute 19':45" just so folks don't miss out on any of the revelations made or the highly deserved Intro reserved for this leading edge Truth Seeker investigating the program of Celebrity Replacements perpetrated by the CIA among other agencies and organizations.

I especially like the part about sharing the experience of first discovering that Sir Faul is not Paul and how once you open your eyes there is no going back plus the fact that this opens a Huge Can of Worms...

I will quote the radio host Andrew Griffin at minute 25':50" saying "I've looked at these comparative photos of Paul from 66 and before, and post that time - it's shocking how different they are, and that people couldn't notice that? Um, that's just a normal thing, why would that be different?"

Andrew Griffin also said the following at minute 29':00": "I also noticed that the veins in his hands, where he's playing the bass, were different! And how do you... you can't change that! So, I would say that's... I mean, there are all these clear clues that this is a different person. That's what just amazed me that more people aren't talking about this. Tina, we've got to go to a break here, but we'll be back and talk more about... Paul, Paul McCartney, call him what you will. He's not the guy we knew on Ed Sullivan back in '64, that's for sure!" His colleague Howard then chimes in with "we're talking about Paul or Faul, the NOT REAL Paul McCartney." with Andrew picking up the ball and referring to "that man who claims to be Sir Paul McCartney".

Folks, this was on national radio and has reached countless people who were either wondering why they had that uneasy feeling in the pit of their stomach when it came to Faul's McCartney vaudeville circus or who never knew the original James Paul McCartney and had never had a chance to compare his physique or his talent with the lame replacement substitute - Faul being to Paul what Aspartame is to Sugar.

I commend Tina for advancing the spirit of our ongoing investigation into the death of Paul by the appeal made on public radio broadcast for information regarding the suspicious death of Mal Evans at the hands of the Los Angeles County Police, which is in all probability tied to the murder of James Paul McCartney and his replacement by an Impostor.

The host of Truth Radio's AxXiom for Liberty program is an interesting and well informed person. For example, at minute 54':00" he talks about how many rock groups of the sixties had ties to the Military Industrial Complex and were coordinated out of Laurel Canyon, bringing the discussion with Tina onto the topic of TPTB orchestrating a 'controlled opposition' and extending their agenda through the CIA's MK-Ultra Mind Control Program to topple our civilization and bring on Helter Skelter as promoted by Charles Manson, embraced by Sir Faul and fomented by satanic rock groups all of whom endorse Aleister Crowley, the Beast 666 and co-founder of the Tavistock Institute for social engineering and cultural control.

POSTER companies in America have airbrushed a cigarette from the hand of PaulMcCartney on the Beatles' Abbey Road album cover. They have performed this Leninist gesture in response to the anti-smoking lobby. In the late Sixties, the cigarette in question played a key role in a widely held conspiracy theory concerning the death of PaulMcCartney. The rumour was rife that McCartney had died in a car crash, and had been replaced by a lookalike. On the cover of Abbey Road, "Paul" is barefoot (corpses are often buried without shoes), and his eyes are closed, as if dead. He is also out of step with the rest. The other Beatles are wearing tell-tale clothing: Ringo, dressed in black, is the pallbearer, George, in denim, is the gravedigger, and John, all in white, is the preacher. Behind them is a Volkswagen with the number plate "28 IF", signifying that Paul would have been 28 years old if he had lived. Furthermore - and this is where this week's news comes in - the lookalikePaul is holding his cigarette in his right hand, whereas every Beatles fan knows that the real Paul is left-handed. Spooky, indeed. It is quite a while - at least 25 years, in fact - since I last heard anyone repeating this great mound of evidence with a furrowed brow and a straight face. But with repetition, the list becomes peculiarly convincing. One can only hope that the air-brushing of Paul's cigarette by a person or persons unknown ignites afresh all the old conspiracy theories. Since the claims concern a celebrity, it can be only a matter of days before a 12-man police squad bursts into Sir PaulMcCartney's home to ask him whether or not he is real. If he hesitates for even one second, he will be bundled off to the nearest police station, where he will be asked to run through the words of "Love Me Do" without hesitation, repetition or deviation. The police must get to the bottom of this great mystery for once and for all. If Sir Paul isn't Sir Paul, then who on earth is he? Tommy Steele? And how many others among our best-loved celebrities are being played by sinister impostors? Soon after the death of HM the Queen Mother, I noticed that "Sir Paul" began to take on her appearance. What does it all mean? Is the impostor making a bid for the Royal status? Alone among columnists, I am often hit by the feeling that I really don't know what to believe any more.

I knew they'd faked the Moon landing long before the movie Capricorn One came along. The fact that OJ Simpson played one of the astronauts only helped to cement my convictions.But if you want to tread the path of rock'n'roll conspiracies, well, take a seat. How long have you got?

Type 'music conspiracies' into your internet search engineand you'll find some evidence that'll make you kick yourself for missing the obvious clues in the first place.PaulMcCartney's dead for starters. Well, the original one anyway!

He was replaced by a lookalike lefthanded bass-player early on, and the rest of The Beatles were sworn to secrecy.

Spurred no doubt by John Lennon, the now Fab Three tried to spill the beans with enigmatic album covers.

Just look at the cover of Abbey Road. What's the number plate on the Volkswagen in the background?

It's 28, the age Paul would have been had he lived. And Paul's barefoot, of course.

Look at the cover of Sgt Pepper. All those dead celebrities on the cover, andPaulwith a hand raised above his head - in the Egyptian death sign!

And, hey, it explains why his music went from brilliant to bloody awful almost overnight...

Spooky or what? Bottom line here, people. If you're PaulMcCartney, then you're living a lie...

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Help me get exposure to PID by dropping a Google PID bomb. Alex Jones has been able to successfully exploit Google's search engine to by-pass the controlled media and focus attention on certain issues. One example is the TSA controversy involving naked body scanners and enhanced pat-downs. Jones dropped a Google bomb, drove the issue to the top of the Google search rankings, and made TSA's irradiation and molestation of innocent passengers a huge issue.

Let's drop a PID Google bomb. Simply enter "Paul McCartney is Dead" a bunch of times in Google. Let's see if we can drive PID up in the search rankings and get more people looking into the tragic replacement of Paul McCartney. Maybe one day, there will be justice for Paul. Thanks for caring!

Sunday, October 31, 2010

This was posted by Getsmart, a fellow PID researcher and guest contributor, on the ATS forum [link]. It is an analysis of the Beatles August 28,1966 LA press conference. As has been discussed in a previous blog post, Was Paul McCartney replaCIAed in August 1966?, I believe this is the first public appearance of Faul as Paul McCartney. Getsmart posits this may also be the Lennon double.

In my opinion, John Lennon's name and image were hijacked to make "him" an ineffectual "leader" of the anti-war movement. In this way, the powers that be could control their opposition. John ONO Lennon and Yoko Ono gave MontyPython-esque interviews against the Vietnam war that made the peace activists look ridiculous, thus discrediting the whole peace movement. This is very similar to how Jim Morrison (the son of the admiral commanding at the false flag Gulf of Tonkin "attack") was planted as a "leader" of the anti-war movement. It just so happens that December 8 is the date for both Jim Morrison's birthday and Lennon's murder.

John Lennon vs. his look-alike double in the 1967 movie, "How I Won the War."

Here is a video of the August 28th, 1966 Los Angeles press conference in which some particularly interesting questions were asked.

After minute 5:00 John replies to the question:"What was the song Eleanor Rigby based upon?"

It is important to realize that this is a song which we now know to have been written on the basis of names on tombstones in St Peters Cemetery where both Paul and John used to roam when they first met. Here is a post which clarifies that John must have known exactly what Eleanor Rigby was based upon, but an impostor couldn't possibly fathom what.Source of The Beatles song Eleanor Rigby

John flippantly replies:"Two queers."

He then seems to be rather bothered by the ensuring hilarity from the crowd. He goes on to interrupt a journalist to correct himself, looking at Paul for a cue, and then says something difficult to make out any better than "Two battle boys" or "Two babble boys," thanks if you can help in deciphering that phrase.

I think that he was referring insultingly to the REAL PAUL and the REAL JOHN whom they have already replaced as their doubles, adding insult to injury by calling them "a couple of queers."

This smacks of "army talk" and does not in any way correspond to the vernacular used by open-minded sixties rebels. Was it because of that giveaway comment that then tried to correct himself? Did he get a signal from a handler to repair his glaring mistake?We have therefore been - and probably since this early date of August 28th, 1966 - in the presence of two impostors posing to the press and the public as the real John Lennon and the real Paul McCartney.

We are obviously not the only ones who noticed strange goings on insofar as The Beatles' identities were concerned, and because of this broad concern among many witnesses, the journalist was then brought to pointedly ask another question - note that this was way back in the summer of 1966:

"Have you ever trained or used Beatle Doubles as DECOYS?

John replies meekly "No... No..." and Paul meekly echoes an identical mimicked "No...No..."and then adds:"We tried to get Brian Epstein to do it, he wouldn't do it."This may well be revealing of why Brian Epstein was assassinated, unwilling he was to assist the murder and replacement of his band members.

In the same press conference video, at minute 6:38 a journalist asks Paul who does Beatles songs the best. Paul looks about as if 'obviously' The Beatles themselves would do Beatles songs the best, but then looks furtively at an equally silent John and embarrassed, he doesn't reply. Obviously they knew they were totally lame as replacement musicians and unable to "do Beatles songs properly," so they both chose to clam up.

At minute 9:41 FAUL gives us his first in a very long series of false identity confessions, with the following statement:

"We know our Real Image which is nothing like our image."

Upon the crowd's uproar he adds loudly:"Forget it !"

Apparently we are not to remember what he says when he has an unconscious lapse. He also possibly thought he'd cleared up his unintentional leak by issuing a 'command' such as those used when coaching mind controlled impostors. Smiling at the crowd, he then looked furtively at someone in the public to his front left, at which time his smile suddenly turns to a frown and he says:"What I meant to say..." followed by silence, hiding his eyes with his hand, not knowing how to get out of his predicament by another statement given that the initiative was not his own but probably commanded by a handler in the audience. John comes to his rescue with another flippant remarks that sounds something like "I like sticks or bricks" although I possibly inaccurately deciphered what John said at minute 10:00.

At minute 12:35 John uses a common impostor 'question avoidance' tactic by replying "No comment" to a simple question about a public statement he had recently made to a journalist and which had been published in the press. Faul, noticing that his response was unsatisfactory and maybe not wanting to be the only one looking like a loser in front of their 'agency impostor handlers' - taunted John saying "Come on, John, tell them what you mean." Thus pressured by his co-conspirator's prompting, John nevertheless was unable to reply to a clear question for any politically structured individual such as John Lennon was purported to be. Here is the question along with John's clueless answer:

QUESTION: "Show Business is an extension of the Jewish religion. Would you mind amplifying that?"

John Lennon:"I mean, you can read into it what you like. It's just a little old statement. I was not very serious about it."

QUESTION: "And those words, how did you piece them together?"

John Lennon:"Oh, I don't know..."

Was John Lennon someone who lent himself to making trivial statements about fundamental political matters? Hardly. On this subject, here is what Texe Marrs confirms:Do The Jews Own Hollywood And The Media?

Let us please remember that this is not the Jewish people nor the Jewish religion, but only a small group of fanatics who have infiltrated several nations among which Israel and the USA and who hide behind judaism to dissimulate their plans which have nothing to do with the welfare of anyone Jewish. They are Zionists, and as our current US Vice-President so eloquently puts it, this has nothing to do with being Jewish. The Zionists are the Illuminati

We know that the Zionists were behind WWII and are fully enmeshed with the CIA and the Illuminati. As evidence, here is how Zionist Jacob Rothschild designed the Israeli Supreme Court filled with Illuminati symbolism, acting in mockery of the honest and honorable citizens of Israel, a Zionist movement that this video says is ANTISEMETIC. The Zionists are Illuminati USURPERS of Judaism

John Lennon obviously knew about this, at least insofar as it extended to the music industry and show business at large. He was quoted by the press for such strong opposition and public statements, which explains why John was replaced, and Paul obviously along with him. John and Paul were rebellious enough for their Agency impostors to find it politically correct in those reactionary times to call them "Two queers". Pardon me if I don't share their sense of humor defiling the dignity of two honorable young men who served humanity with their duty to the TRUTH.

At the end of the Los Angeles video, at minute 14:00 John goes so far as to declare right before turning to Paul laughing:

"You can't always tell the would be's from the real thing."

GS

________________________

Let us remember that

The Beatles were a deeply politicized band, something which was obscured by their drift into mindless psychedelic spaced out apolitical passivity from Sgt Pepper onwards. Today they appear as either naive lyric artists when looking at their early days to an apogee of studio musicians and 64 track mixed sound effects to blow out your mind on drugs. The hard edge was entirely LOBOTOMIZED from their music as if their minds had been removed, something which was apparently done by also removing and replacing their bodies with look-alikes.