February 28, 2007 | (This story has been corrected to reflect Martin Scorsese’s best director win for “The Departed,” as well as the director’s political contributions.) Academy Awards acceptance speeches have a reputation for turning political—certainly former vice president Al Gore‘s Oscar win provided a front-row seat to the intersection between Washington and Hollywood—but this year’s nominees would not appear to be especially active political contributors.

Only four of the actors, actresses, directors and producers nominated for the prestigious film award this year spent any amount of their riches on political contributions in the 2006 election cycle, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. Yet Tinseltown is a major part of an industry that traditionally has played a significant role in financing federal campaigns.

The entertainment industry contributed nearly $23 million to candidates and parties in 2005-2006 election cycle, 63 percent of which went to Democrats, according to information available Jan. 22. The industry has historically favored Democrats and has ranked among the top 12 most generous industries to give political contributions since 1996.

The biggest contributors in the industry don’t just include those working in film. Cable companies such as Comcast and media conglomerates such as Time Warner topped the list of 20 largest total contributions from employees and PACs in the 2006 election. Disney and the National Cable & Telecom Association are also on the list. And the industry’s biggest givers are not usually the stars who stroll down the red carpet, but instead producers and studio heads working behind the scenes.

Among the actors, actresses, producers and directors to be nominated for the Oscar this year, director and producer Steven Spielberg was the most generous political contributor, giving—along with his wife, actress Kate Capshaw—a total of $37,400 to Democrats, including Sens. Claire McCaskill, Jon Tester, Sherrod Brown and a contribution of $5,000 to Sen. Barack Obama‘s political action committee. Spielberg was a co-producer of “Letters from Iwo Jima,” which lost this year’s best motion picture award to “The Departed.”

Clint Eastwood, who directed “Letters from Iwo Jima” and lost the best director award to Martin Scorsese for “The Departed,” contributed $1,200 to the Directors Guild of America’s PAC. Scorsese gave $1,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in the last election cycle, while his wife, Helen, contributed $1,000 to Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat. Marc Turtletaub, who produced “Little Miss Sunshine,” contributed $10,000 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. “Little Miss Sunshine” was also up for best motion picture.

Others in Hollywood were far more prolific givers in the most recent election cycle. Stephen Bing, owner of the production company Shangri-La Entertainment (producer of “The Polar Express”), topped the list of Californians in the entertainment industry. His nearly $142,000 went entirely to Democrats. In the 2004 election cycle, Bing gave nearly $14 million to progressive issue advocacy groups.

Others on the 2006 list of top contributors in the entertainment industry from the Golden State include the chief executives of Warner Brothers and Universal Studios, film directors Rob Reiner and James Brooks and TV producer Norman Lear. Laurie David, wife of “Seinfeld” creator Larry David and a producer of Gore’s Oscar-winning documentary “An Inconvenient Truth,” gave more than $76,000 to Democrats. And singer and actress Barbra Streisand also makes the list of top contributors in Hollywood, having given at least $85,450 to Democrats. Only two of the top 20 contributed almost entirely to Republicans.

Al Gore used the Academy Awards to jokingly announce his candidacy for president (an announcement that was interrupted by the ceremony’s orchestra), but the declared 2008 presidential candidates are already seeking Hollywood’s support. In the 2006 cycle, when she was running for re-election to the Senate, Hillary Rodham Clinton received the most contributions from the industry of any candidate–nearly $529,000, three times more than the closest recipient. But fellow senator and Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has already surpassed Clinton’s 2006 haul from Hollywood by bringing in a hefty $1.3 million at a single fundraiser, upstaging the former first lady in the early months of the campaign.

—Researcher Douglas Weber contributed to this report.

Top Individual “Hollywood” Donors, 2006 Election Cycle

Contributors

City

State

Organization

Total

%Dem

%Repub

BING, STEPHEN L

LOS ANGELES

CA

Shangri-La Entertainment

$141,900

100%

0%

MATHIS, BENJAMIN L MR

WEST HOLLYWOOD

CA

Mathis Entertainment

$130,790

0%

100%

FOOS, RICHARD

SANTA MONICA

CA

Shout! Factory

$126,700

100%

0%

BROOKS, JAMES L

CULVER CITY

CA

Gracie Films

$116,500

100%

0%

LEAR, NORMAN

BEVERLY HILLS

CA

Act III Communications

$107,450

99%

0%

HORN, ALAN F

BURBANK

CA

Warner Brothers

$97,000

100%

0%

SABAN, HAIM

LOS ANGELES

CA

Saban Capital Group

$96,000

84%

0%

HORN, CINDY H

LOS ANGELES

CA

Warner Brothers

$94,950

100%

0%

MEYER, RONALD

UNIVERSAL CITY

CA

Universal Studios

$89,550

88%

12%

REINER, ROBERT

BEVERLY HILLS

CA

Castle Rock Entertainment

$86,200

99%

0%

STREISAND, BARBRA

WOODLAND HILLS

CA

Barbra Streisand/Actress/Singer

$85,450

98%

0%

PERENCHIO, MARGARET A MRS

LOS ANGELES

CA

Chartwell Partners

$85,000

5%

95%

PALLADINO, AMY S

SHERMAN OAKS

CA

Warner Brothers

$84,200

100%

0%

KING, MICHAEL

BEVERLY HILLS

CA

King World Productions

$81,400

100%

0%

KATZENBERG, JEFFREY

UNIVERSAL CTY

CA

Dreamworks SKG

$78,550

100%

0%

MEYER, BARRY M

BURBANK

CA

Warner Brothers

$78,298

96%

4%

PERENCHIO, A J MR

LOS ANGELES

CA

Chartwell Partners

$77,300

15%

85%

CAHILL, ROBERT

LOS ANGELES

CA

Univision Communications

$77,050

31%

69%

DAVID, LAURIE

PACIFIC PALISADES

CA

Larry David Productions

$76,600

99%

1%

SANDRICH, JAY

SANTA MONICA

CA

Wet Sand Productions

$76,075

100%

0%

METHODOLOGY: Includes donations to federal candidates and parties from contributors who work in the television, movie or music industry and who provided a California address with at least some of their contributions. Although all contributions were given during 2005-2006, they may have been designated for prior or future cycles, or may be reattributed to another family member or refunded at a later date. Based on data available electronically from the Federal Election Commission on Jan. 22, 2007.

Except for the Revolving Door section, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License by OpenSecrets.org. To request permission for commercial use, please contact us.