Comments on: 11 Reasons to Use Twitter Bootstraphttps://www.sitepoint.com/11-reasons-to-use-twitter-bootstrap/
Learn CSS | HTML5 | JavaScript | Wordpress | Tutorials-Web Development | Reference | Books and MoreFri, 09 Dec 2016 23:21:00 +0000hourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=4.4.2By: Anirudha Guptahttps://www.sitepoint.com/11-reasons-to-use-twitter-bootstrap/#comment-89310
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:56:55 +0000http://www.sitepoint.com/?p=62373#comment-89310I am using bootstrap from a little time. I like it because it’s save a lot of time do same thing on every project. I happy to read about framework here on sitepoint.
]]>By: Lucyanne Ndunguhttps://www.sitepoint.com/11-reasons-to-use-twitter-bootstrap/#comment-89309
Sun, 13 Jan 2013 02:43:24 +0000http://www.sitepoint.com/?p=62373#comment-89309This information is really helpful…definitely am going to use bootstrap in my next project…..
]]>By: Aronhttps://www.sitepoint.com/11-reasons-to-use-twitter-bootstrap/#comment-89308
Sat, 12 Jan 2013 15:33:38 +0000http://www.sitepoint.com/?p=62373#comment-89308The best way to use frameworks such as Bootstrap and Foundation is to Fork them on GitHub, then use the parts you want to build and fine tune your own set of tools.
Reusing code as a starting point and customising for each project is much faster than reinventing the wheel every time.
]]>By: ertan kayalarhttps://www.sitepoint.com/11-reasons-to-use-twitter-bootstrap/#comment-89307
Fri, 11 Jan 2013 19:09:47 +0000http://www.sitepoint.com/?p=62373#comment-89307I aggree with you. Foundation is better. Clean & simple code.
]]>By: yonhttps://www.sitepoint.com/11-reasons-to-use-twitter-bootstrap/#comment-89306
Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:31:19 +0000http://www.sitepoint.com/?p=62373#comment-89306and there’s an important reason to don’t use it, your code get messy and more time consuming to be processed …
]]>By: Alastair Moorehttps://www.sitepoint.com/11-reasons-to-use-twitter-bootstrap/#comment-89305
Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:00:58 +0000http://www.sitepoint.com/?p=62373#comment-89305I’ve been very interested in Twitter Bootstrap but it uses LESS and I’m more of a SASS guy. Thanks to the above who mentioned Foundation – I think I might be swayed towards that.
]]>By: Patrickhttps://www.sitepoint.com/11-reasons-to-use-twitter-bootstrap/#comment-89304
Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:09:29 +0000http://www.sitepoint.com/?p=62373#comment-89304“In addition to this, a lot of the styling and design aspects are already taken care of, since the CSS is built with LESS.”

I don’t understand this sentence at all. What difference does it make if it was built with LESS?

]]>By: Mik Fieldinghttps://www.sitepoint.com/11-reasons-to-use-twitter-bootstrap/#comment-89303
Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:05:10 +0000http://www.sitepoint.com/?p=62373#comment-89303I have mucked about with Bootstrap along with a few other frameworks out there, I found some good ideas but, like all of the others I find in messy and it takes a lot of time to strip out all of the stuff you don’t need. I agree with John Polling, most other frameworks it leads to poor quality markup.
I eventually gave up on other frameworks and designed my own, nicking some of the best bits I have found, of course, but getting things arranged in a logical and easy to edit manner. I have stripped it down to the basic essentials and have a catalogue of elements that can be added as and when required.
I still check out others to see if anyone has come up with anything useful, but on the whole I have found that, generally speaking, the frameworks out there, Bootstrap included, are built by techies who are very good at making these all singing, all dancing frameworks, but in everyday use by a designer they become very cumbersome in use.
The same goes for WordPress themes and frameworks also …
]]>By: Cor Claessenhttps://www.sitepoint.com/11-reasons-to-use-twitter-bootstrap/#comment-89302
Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:29:09 +0000http://www.sitepoint.com/?p=62373#comment-89302I did find it a bit of a struggle to f.i. change the nav area. After a while I found out the best way to make changes is to add an additional css file to your html files.
Also a good framework and very easy to add your own styling is Skeleton. Check it out.
]]>By: John Pollinghttps://www.sitepoint.com/11-reasons-to-use-twitter-bootstrap/#comment-89301
Thu, 10 Jan 2013 07:58:30 +0000http://www.sitepoint.com/?p=62373#comment-89301It’s fine for quick prototypes, however for production sites it’s not good enough. It makes you write poor quality markup and the JS libraries are far from unobtrusive.