22 August 2012

The April Theses is a classic
document, not because it is polished (it is rough), but because of its impact
at a moment of history. It was given by Lenin verbally. The written version
(download linked below) was prepared very shortly afterwards.

Lenin arrived in Petrograd (later Leningrad; now St
Petersburg) barely a month after the February, 1917 revolution which had
overthrown the Tsar. A bourgeois republican government was installed that had
the intention of continuing the disastrous intra-Imperialist war in which
Russia was involved against Germany and other countries. This is the war known to bourgeois historians
as the First World War, the one that started in 1914 and ended in 1918. South
Africa was also involved in it.

It was among those few individuals and small organisations
who opposed the Imperialist war in South Africa that the need for our communist
party was first seriously raised. The Communist Party of South Africa was
formed by admission to the Communist International in 1921 – the same Communist
International that Lenin called for in the April Theses in 1917.

In April 1917 there was no Communist International but Thesis 10 demands “A new International.”

“We must take the initiative in creating a
revolutionary International, an International against the social-chauvinists
and against the ‘Centre’,” it says.

The Third
International (also called Communist International or Comintern) was duly
established in 1919.

The
“social-chauvinsists” of different countries (e.g. Germany, Britain, France and
Italy as well as Russia) had supported the Imperialist war against each other,
thus betraying the Second International. But the Russian Bolsheviks and the
German Spartacists had opposed the war, and had supported proletarian
internationalism.

The term
“revolutionary defencism” was a code for the further continuation of the
Russian war policy, which Lenin clearly opposes in Thesis 1.

The “April Theses” are short and so do not require a long
introduction. But one can usefully highlight the following:

Thesis 2 says “The specific feature of the present
situation in Russia is that the country is passing from the first stage of the
revolution — which, owing to the insufficient class-consciousness and
organisation of the proletariat, placed power in the hands of the bourgeoisie —
…

“This peculiar
situation demands of us an ability to adapt ourselves to the special conditions
of Party work among unprecedentedly large masses of proletarians who have just
awakened to political life.”

There are echoes of this situation in South Africa today.

Thesis 4 says “As long as we are in the minority we carry
on the work of criticising and exposing errors and at the same time we preach
the necessity of transferring the entire state power to the Soviets of Workers'
Deputies, so that the people may overcome their mistakes by experience.”
This led to the slogan “All Power to the
Soviets”, and Thesis 5 then says
“to return to a parliamentary republic
from the Soviets of Workers' Deputies would be a retrograde step.”

Thesis 8 says: “It is not our immediate task to
"introduce" socialism, but only to bring social production and the
distribution of products at once under the control of the Soviets of Workers'
Deputies.” In other words, the bourgeois dictatorship was to be replaced at
once by a dictatorship over the bourgeoisie.

Thesis 9 proposes
to change the Party’s name from “Social Democrat” (RSDLP) to “Communist Party.”

So much of this did come to pass, as we know, that it is
difficult to imagine that Lenin’s support for these demands at the time, among
the leadership and even among the strictly Bolshevik leadership, was small.

But what we have noted before, and which was manifest at the
Second and Third Congresses of the RSDLP, applied again. Lenin knew how the
base of the Party was constructed and how it was reproducing itself. Hence he
was able to be bold. He knew that the cadre force of the Bolsheviks as a whole,
and potentially the entire working masses of Russia, were behind his proposals,
or soon would be. And so it came to pass.