How not to censor people (by GCHQ and Oxbridge)

GCHQ have shown continuous and arrogant disdain to what I had to say with regards to national security whilst at one of their recruitment centres. I have emails which prove as much but which I do not feel I should show for the moment. They were and are interested in self-preservation and intent on the harassment of myself in order to steal my work and are certainly not interested in national security.

I posted the last of my series of essays which highlight flaws in the systems of surveillance on the GCHQ twitter feed.

Naturally most people might be inclined to think that they would show some form of interest even at this late stage, but as has always been the case, this has always been as such.

In fact as I said would occur, they censored the discussion. My twitter profile is on the left in this case and another profile is on the right. For reference my tweet is the first one on the left.

The fact that I have leaked a considerable amount of information in relation to that agency.

The fact that they censor a discussion in relation to national security which is already taking place on an open basis and should be in any case. It is rather like when they censored discussion about the discovery of the computer by Alan Turing for 30 years.