I agree. Murray need to get a good sports shrink and get his head on straight. He is good enough to win a slam,and I think he will do it sooner or later. Plus,he also has the ability to beat Djokovic,and should have won their Rome semi if not for his lousy mental strength.

Just cause Murray gets upset twice means he's finished? No, he's not finished; Far from it. He's still young and he has a lot of talent. Just cause he lost doesn't mean he's done. God, I hate these threads where people say players are done just cause they have a bad beat!

Actually, whoever was stupid enough to take this thread seriously needs to see a doctor.

Also, I may point out that winning in Cincy has nothing to do with the original post. The OP says that he will drop out of the top 5 soon, will slide from there, and will never win a major. Winning Cincy is irrelevant.

The only thing I was wrong about is him never shaving again. That, I'm genuinely surprised about.

After losing easily to Kevin Anderson 6-3, 6-1 in Montreal, Murray is done.He has no mind, and a weak retriever game. He will drop out of the top 5 next year, and slowly slide from there. Will never win a major. Will never shave again.

Thoughts?

Click to expand...

So, therefore, how does Murray losing in Montreal mean that he is "done"? That too must be irrelevant.

]Actually, whoever was stupid enough to take this thread seriously needs to see a doctor.[/B]

Also, I may point out that winning in Cincy has nothing to do with the original post. The OP says that he will drop out of the top 5 soon, will slide from there, and will never win a major. Winning Cincy is irrelevant.

The only thing I was wrong about is him never shaving again. That, I'm genuinely surprised about.

Credibility is like virginity - when it's gone, it's gone. You popped your credibility cherry with this thread. The fact that you proudly bumped your own epic fail just confirms how hard of thinking you are.

Credibility is like virginity - when it's gone, it's gone. You popped your credibility cherry with this thread. The fact that you proudly bumped your own epic fail just confirms how hard of thinking you are.

Hey I made it to the semis of four in a row of the top tournaments in the world.
You did better than 2 short of 6 billion people in the world BUT YOU DIDN'T DO BETTER THAN 6 BILLION PEOPLE IN THE WORLD SO YOU'RE A LOSER!!

Hey I made it to the semis of four in a row of the top tournaments in the world.
You did better than 2 short of 6 billion people in the world BUT YOU DIDN'T DO BETTER THAN 6 BILLION PEOPLE IN THE WORLD SO YOU'RE A LOSER!!

Lendl's biggest challenge is retooling Murray's game around his weapons because Murray hasn't many as developed as, say, Rafa's intensity, Novak's balance and fitness, or Roger's caginess and stroke arsenal. Murray has perhaps the best set of wheels on tour but these he uses mainly for staying back and defending or counterpunching or playing cat and mouse slowly constricting the point like a boa when Murray should probably speed it up and impose his athleticism for cheaper points at some times.
This is Lendl's problem: he has in his stable one of the fittest but likely the most coordinated top pro at the peak age physically twenty-five or so but this "peak" pro in Lendl's charge does not seem to enjoy discomfort or the pain like Rafa nor does he have quite the array of strokes as Federer, or the fighting heart of a champion nor can he (or anybody) sustain what is arguably the greatest "average" work rate on court like Novak; no, instead we have a soft-batched momma's boy whose off-the-charts levels of hand-and foot-eye coordination are mattering very little- partly because nobody seems to have ever told Murray forcefully enough to STFU when he was whining about whatever while growing up, and so, he has grown accustomed to putting on negative, attention-seeking airs in competition that probably do not serve his greater cause but are so deep-rooted that Lendl must demolish this architecture before Andy surrenders because individuals who throw tantrums tend to "have to be right."

Lendl's biggest challenge is retooling Murray's game around his weapons because Murray hasn't many as developed as, say, Rafa's intensity, Novak's balance and fitness, or Roger's caginess and stroke arsenal. Murray has perhaps the best set of wheels on tour but these he uses mainly for staying back and defending or counterpunching or playing cat and mouse slowly constricting the point like a boa when Murray should probably speed it up and impose his athleticism for cheaper points at some times.
This is Lendl's problem: he has in his stable one of the fittest but likely the most coordinated top pro at the peak age physically twenty-five or so but this "peak" pro in Lendl's charge does not seem to enjoy discomfort or the pain like Rafa nor does he have quite the array of strokes as Federer, or the fighting heart of a champion nor can he (or anybody) sustain what is arguably the greatest "average" work rate on court like Novak; no, instead we have a soft-batched momma's boy whose off-the-charts levels of hand-and foot-eye coordination are mattering very little- partly because nobody seems to have
ever told Murray forcefully enough to STFU when he was whining about whatever while growing up, and so, he has grown accustomed to putting on negative, attention-seeking airs in competition that probably do not serve his greater cause but are so deep-rooted that Lendl must demolish this
architecture before Andy surrenders because individuals who throw tantrums tend to "have to be right."

Click to expand...

Very true, he doesnt seem to thrive in competition like other top players and he is so incredibly moody on the court. He can be playing great tennis, then just a few bad points can cause him to go off the deep end. His lack of fight in the GS finals he has played shows that mentally he just isnt there yet.

After losing easily to Kevin Anderson 6-3, 6-1 in Montreal, Murray is done. He has no mind, and a weak retriever game. He will drop out of the top 5 next year, and slowly slide from there. Will never win a major. Will never shave again.