Welcome

Welcome to the POZ Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and
others concerned about HIV/AIDS. Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the
conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning: Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive
and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a
username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own
physician.

All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators
of these forums. Click here for “Am I Infected?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ community forums.

We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please
provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are
true and correct to their knowledge.

Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the
symbol in each box.

Welcome to Am I Infected

Welcome to the "Am I Infected?" POZ forum.

New members -- those who have posted three or fewer messages -- are permitted to post questions and responses, free of charge (make them count!). Ongoing participation in the "Am I Infected?" forum -- posting more than three questions or responses -- requires a paid subscription.

A seven-day subscription is $9.99, a 30-day subscription is $14.99 and a 90-day subscription is $24.99.

Anyone who needs to post more than three messages in the "Am I Infected?" forum -- including past, present and future POZ Forums members -- will need to subscribe, with secure payments made via PayPal.

There will be no charge to continue reading threads in the "Am I Infected?" forum, nor will there be a charge for participating in any of the Main Forums; Meds, Mind, Body & Benefits; and Off Topic Forums. Similarly, all POZ pages, including our "HIV Transmission and Risks" and "Am I Infected? (A Guide to Testing for HIV)" basics, will remain accessible to all.

NOTE: HIV testing questions will still need to be posted in the "Am I Infected?" forum; attempts to post HIV symptoms or testing questions in any other forums will be considered violations of our rules of membership and subject to time-outs and permanent bans.

To learn how to upgrade your Forums account to participate beyond three posts in the "Am I Infected?" Forum, please click here.

Thank you for your understanding and future support of the best online support service for people living with, affected by and at risk for HIV.

I understand that the sensitivity of a test kit reflects how well it is able to detect the presence of hiv in a blood sample. The qn i am abt to ask is that, if a test kit states 99.9 % sensitivity, does that imply that out of 1000 positive test samples, it would be able to detect 999 of them.

Now if we say that these 1000 people are 1 yr post infection (i wan to rule out the window period of 3 mths plus the 1 or 2 cases in history of delayed seroconversion of up to 1 yr), does that mean that the test kit would still be able to detect only 999 of them, leaving the 1 lone case undetected?

1/10th of a percent, may get an indeterminate result, which will trigger them to retest you....so, even YOU will fall into the accurate safe zone of the test*

and the stories of long seroconversion are just that actually....taken from the past back when doctors/researchers, had no choice but to believe what people was telling them. Now a days, that isnt true, as technological advancements in medical field, proves otherwise.

Please, seek the proper care for your issues, Fear and anxiety disorders left untreated can and will fester into something beyond your control, treat it before you lose touch with reality. Good Luck & God Bless*

"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

sorry to probe further. given a test kit with 99.9% specificity, and the same sample size of 1000 positive subjects, it would mean that there is always 1 who will test negative / indeterminate on the test kit, assuming that testing is done post all of their window period?

sorry about this qn, as i was juz wondering why do they put 99.9% specificity? i mean, isn't it true that regardless of what sensitivity/specificity of a test kit, as long as e subject is tested beyond the window period of 3 mths and if he/she is hiv positive, it would be shown on e test kit itself? He/she can't be the 1 out of the 1000 rite?

I think the reason they say 99.9% is that there is a chance of a false positive result. There would not be a false negative. So the inaccuracy of the test is in your favour. If the test is negative then you are negative. I think that is what they say at miraTes. I have read the leaflet my Dr gave me and it is pretty clear that the only inaccurate result will be a false postive.