On the season finale, the characters struggle to conceal who they really are.

HBO

"You're not the man you're pretending to be."

- Maester Luwin

"You may be right. But I've gone too far to pretend to be anything else."

- Theon Greyjoy

When it comes to authenticity, Maester Luwin is more qualified to offer advice than nearly anyone in Westeros; as the sworn advisor to the Lord of Winterfell—whoever that lord may be—Luwin knows exactly who he is, and exactly what role he has to play. But that makes him a rare figure in Westeros. Two seasons in, the vast majority of Game of Thrones' major players are still discovering the truth about themselves as the battle for the Iron Throne rages on. Games of Thrones' entire second season has been about pretending, and last night's season finale, "Valar Morghulis" finds each character confronting their own nature: who they truly are, who others think they are, or who they pretend to be.

Unfortunately for Theon Greyjoy, who fails to heed Maester Luwin's advice, the question comes as he mounts a last stand that's as pathetic and misguided as the rest of his brief reign over Winterfell. When Theon launches into a speech full of clichés about bravery and glory that feels cobbled together from leftover bits of Gladiator and 300, he's attempting to play the part of the heroic leader. But despite his best efforts, no speech can disguise the pointlessness of his cause, or the long string of missteps he's made. (In fact, his stupidly grandiose speech is almost exactly the opposite of Tyrion Lannister's pragmatic "Let's go kill them!" call to arms in last week's "Blackwater," which was both more honest and more stirring.) Theon may feel trapped as the man he's pretending to be, but it's a trap he set for himself when he betrayed Robb Stark, and it's hard to imagine he'll be remembered as anything but a Winterfell's version of Benedict Arnold—if he's remembered at all.

Which isn't to say that actual heroism guarantees a legacy. They say history is written by the winners, but Tyrion Lannister's spectacular success in the Battle of Blackwater has already been overshadowed by the contributions of his father Tywin, who Joffrey names both King's Hand and "savior of the realm." But despite the injustice of his dismissal, Tyrion has gained something more valuable than a new castle, a new title, or a bag of gold: true, unshakeable self-knowledge. In Game of Thrones' first season, Tyrion offered Jon Snow a piece of advice that summed up his general philosophy in life: "Never forget what you are. The rest of the world will not. Wear it like armor, and it can never be used to hurt you." At the time, he was talking about being a dwarf—a fact that defined even his own understanding of himself. But in "Valar Morghulis," Tyrion finally defines himself not just by how others see him, but by what he truly is: a skilled player in the game of thrones. "It's what I'm good at. It's what I am," Tyrion explains to Shae, and though his actual power may be diminished, his sense of purpose has never seemed stronger.

If only Tyrion could lend some of his new perspective to Jon Snow, whose own sense of purpose is shaken to the core when he kills Qhorin Halfhand, a fellow brother of the Night's Watch, in order to infiltrate the wildling army beyond the Wall. If word ever reaches the Night's Watch, Jon will be cursed as a traitor—somewhat paradoxically, since killing Qhorin is the best way to serve the Night's Watch. Jon Snow has always been a hero, but his heroism has never come at the price of his own reputation until now. On the surface, after all, there's no difference between Jon Snow's "betrayal" of Qhorin Halfhand and Theon Greyjoy's betrayal of the Starks—and in the end, the consequences may prove to be just as severe.

But "Valar Morghulis" isn't only about people learning to pretend; it's also about people who can't stand pretending anymore. On the other side of the war, Robb Stark—who's spent the season successfully pretending to be a fearless leader, and earned a loyal following for it—throws caution to the wind and embraces what he really is: a lovestruck, impulsive young man. His marriage to Talisa, which betrays the alliance he made with Walder Frey last season, is an indefensible move strategically. But it's unsurprising that Robb, who has thousands of lives that depend on his ability to appear strong, would want marry the one person who seems to accept him for who he really is.

But not everyone has that luxury. Pretending can also mean survival—a fact that Sansa Stark, like Jon Snow, is learning as she makes her way through vastly different (but equally treacherous) enemy territory. As Robb begins his marriage, Sansa sees the end of her engagement, when Joffrey breaks it off with her in favor of a more politically advantageous union with Margaery Tyrell. As Littlefinger reminds Sansa, everyone in King's Landing is a liar, and the obviously scripted, absurdly theatrical process by which Joffrey openly courts Margaery—a queen to the rival king Renly not so long ago—is a reminder that King's Landing bears ample rewards for anyone who's able to play the game well enough.

But strategy and cunning aren't necessarily enough, as Xaro Xhaon Daxos learns the hard way when Daenerys Targaryen strikes back against him. Xaro is one of Game of Thrones' ultimate pretenders: a man with absolutely nothing, who rose to power merely by acting as if he already had power. But he made a serious tactical error by crossing Daenerys—one of Game of Thrones' few truly authentic characters (along with Arya Stark and Brienne of Tarth). If Daenerys had any doubts about the righteousness of her cause, or her ability to achieve it, she lost them in the House of the Undying, when she walked away from the beautiful vision of her husband and son to win back her true "children": her dragons. In every challenge she's faced, Daenerys has proven incorruptible, which makes her a fitter leader for Westeros than any of the squabbling kings—including Stannis, who technically remains Robert's rightful heir even as he falls deeper under Melisandre's spell.

But for all the pretending and scheming that's happened over the battle for the Iron Throne that has defined Game of Thrones' second season, an even darker question looms over "Valar Morghulis": In the end, will any of this matter? The episode draws to a close with a reminder of the enemy that everyone in Westeros underestimates: the White Walkers, who lead an army of the resurrected dead. The White Walkers were present from Game of Thrones' very first scene, but we—like Game of Thrones' main characters—have largely lost sight of them amidst the petty squabbling over the Iron Throne. Whatever their strengths or weaknesses, the inhabitants of Westeros are woefully underprepared for the inhuman enemies marching south to fight them—or for the winter that's still coming.

Note: For the sake of viewers who are experiencing the Game of Thrones story for the first time, we request that those who have read the Song of Ice and Fire series avoid revealing spoilers for upcoming episodes in the comments section below.

About the Author

Most Popular

The legend of the Confederate leader’s heroism and decency is based in the fiction of a person who never existed.

The strangest part about the continued personality cult of Robert E. Lee is how few of the qualities his admirers profess to see in him he actually possessed.

Memorial Day has the tendency to conjure up old arguments about the Civil War. That’s understandable; it was created to mourn the dead of a war in which the Union was nearly destroyed, when half the country rose up in rebellion in defense of slavery. This year, the removal of Lee’s statue in New Orleans has inspired a new round of commentary about Lee, not to mention protests on his behalf by white supremacists.

The myth of Lee goes something like this: He was a brilliant strategist and devoted Christian man who abhorred slavery and labored tirelessly after the war to bring the country back together.

On August 21, the “moon” will pass between the Earth and the sun, obscuring the light of the latter. The government agency NASA says this will result in “one of nature’s most awe-inspiring sights.” The astronomers there claim to have calculated down to the minute exactly when and where this will happen, and for how long. They have reportedly known about this eclipse for years, just by virtue of some sort of complex math.

This seems extremely unlikely. I can’t even find these eclipse calculations on their website to check them for myself.

Meanwhile the scientists tell us we can’t look at it without special glasses because “looking directly at the sun is unsafe.”

Just seven months into his presidency, Trump appears to have achieved a status usually reserved for the final months of a term.

In many ways, the Trump presidency never got off the ground: The president’s legislative agenda is going nowhere, his relations with foreign leaders are frayed, and his approval rating with the American people never enjoyed the honeymoon period most newly elected presidents do. Pundits who are sympathetic toward, or even neutral on, the president keep hoping that the next personnel move—the appointment of White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, say, or the long-rumored-but-never-delivered departure of Steve Bannon—will finally get the White House in gear.

But what if they, and many other people, are thinking about it wrong? Maybe the reality is not that the Trump presidency has never gotten started. It’s that he’s already reached his lame-duck period. For most presidents, that comes in the last few months of a term. For Trump, it appears to have arrived early, just a few months into his term. The president did always brag that he was a fast learner.

An analysis of Stormfront forums shows a sometimes sophisticated understanding of the limits of ancestry tests.

The white-nationalist forum Stormfront hosts discussions on a wide range of topics, from politics to guns to The Lord of the Rings. And of particular and enduring interest: genetic ancestry tests. For white nationalists, DNA tests are a way to prove their racial purity. Of course, their results don’t always come back that way. And how white nationalists try to explain away non-European ancestry is rather illuminating of their beliefs.

Two years ago—before Donald Trump was elected president, before white nationalism had become central to the political conversation—Aaron Panofsky and Joan Donovan, sociologists then at the University of California, Los Angeles, set out to study Stormfront forum posts about genetic ancestry tests. They presented their study at the American Sociological Association meeting this Monday. (A preprint of the paper is now online.) After the events in Charlottesville this week, their research struck a particular chord with the audience.

More comfortable online than out partying, post-Millennials are safer, physically, than adolescents have ever been. But they’re on the brink of a mental-health crisis.

One day last summer, around noon, I called Athena, a 13-year-old who lives in Houston, Texas. She answered her phone—she’s had an iPhone since she was 11—sounding as if she’d just woken up. We chatted about her favorite songs and TV shows, and I asked her what she likes to do with her friends. “We go to the mall,” she said. “Do your parents drop you off?,” I asked, recalling my own middle-school days, in the 1980s, when I’d enjoy a few parent-free hours shopping with my friends. “No—I go with my family,” she replied. “We’ll go with my mom and brothers and walk a little behind them. I just have to tell my mom where we’re going. I have to check in every hour or every 30 minutes.”

Those mall trips are infrequent—about once a month. More often, Athena and her friends spend time together on their phones, unchaperoned. Unlike the teens of my generation, who might have spent an evening tying up the family landline with gossip, they talk on Snapchat, the smartphone app that allows users to send pictures and videos that quickly disappear. They make sure to keep up their Snapstreaks, which show how many days in a row they have Snapchatted with each other. Sometimes they save screenshots of particularly ridiculous pictures of friends. “It’s good blackmail,” Athena said. (Because she’s a minor, I’m not using her real name.) She told me she’d spent most of the summer hanging out alone in her room with her phone. That’s just the way her generation is, she said. “We didn’t have a choice to know any life without iPads or iPhones. I think we like our phones more than we like actual people.”

Antifa’s activists say they’re battling burgeoning authoritarianism on the American right. Are they fueling it instead?

Since 1907, Portland, Oregon, has hosted an annual Rose Festival. Since 2007, the festival had included a parade down 82nd Avenue. Since 2013, the Republican Party of Multnomah County, which includes Portland, had taken part. This April, all of that changed.

In the days leading up to the planned parade, a group called the Direct Action Alliance declared, “Fascists plan to march through the streets,” and warned, “Nazis will not march through Portland unopposed.” The alliance said it didn’t object to the Multnomah GOP itself, but to “fascists” who planned to infiltrate its ranks. Yet it also denounced marchers with “Trump flags” and “red maga hats” who could “normalize support for an orange man who bragged about sexually harassing women and who is waging a war of hate, racism and prejudice.” A second group, Oregon Students Empowered, created a Facebook page called “Shut down fascism! No nazis in Portland!”

Anti-Semitic logic fueled the violence over the weekend, no matter what the president says.

The “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville was ostensibly about protecting a statue of Robert E. Lee. It was about asserting the legitimacy of “white culture” and white supremacy, and defending the legacy of the Confederacy.

So why did the demonstrators chant anti-Semitic lines like “Jews will not replace us”?

The demonstration was suffused with anti-black racism, but also with anti-Semitism. Marchers displayed swastikas on banners and shouted slogans like “blood and soil,” a phrase drawn from Nazi ideology. “This city is run by Jewish communists and criminal niggers,” one demonstrator told Vice News’ Elspeth Reeve during their march. As Jews prayed at a local synagogue, Congregation Beth Israel, men dressed in fatigues carrying semi-automatic rifles stood across the street, according to the temple’s president. Nazi websites posted a call to burn their building. As a precautionary measure, congregants had removed their Torah scrolls and exited through the back of the building when they were done praying.

The nation’s current post-truth moment is the ultimate expression of mind-sets that have made America exceptional throughout its history.

When did America become untethered from reality?

I first noticed our national lurch toward fantasy in 2004, after President George W. Bush’s political mastermind, Karl Rove, came up with the remarkable phrase reality-based community. People in “the reality-based community,” he told a reporter, “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality … That’s not the way the world really works anymore.” A year later, The Colbert Report went on the air. In the first few minutes of the first episode, Stephen Colbert, playing his right-wing-populist commentator character, performed a feature called “The Word.” His first selection: truthiness. “Now, I’m sure some of the ‘word police,’ the ‘wordinistas’ over at Webster’s, are gonna say, ‘Hey, that’s not a word!’ Well, anybody who knows me knows that I’m no fan of dictionaries or reference books.

If the president is concerned about violence on the left, he can start by fighting the white supremacist movements whose growth has fueled its rise.

In his Tuesday press conference, Donald Trump talked at length about what he called “the alt left.” White supremacists, he claimed, weren’t the only people in Charlottesville last weekend that deserved condemnation. “You had a group on the other side that was also very violent,” he declared. “Nobody wants to say that.”

I can say with great confidence that Trump’s final sentence is untrue. I can do so because the September issue of TheAtlantic contains an essay of mine entitled “The Rise of the Violent Left,” which discusses the very phenomenon that Trump claims “nobody wants” to discuss. Trump is right that, in Charlottesville and beyond, the violence of some leftist activists constitutes a real problem. Where he’s wrong is in suggesting that it’s a problem in any way comparable to white supremacism.