Platinum Medal - what limit would this be set at?Total Wins - as long as it is not too excessive i would be a supporter. Currently there are only 250 ish players active with more than 2500 wins so if this was say 5000 wins needed to get gold i would not be a fan. yes there are some cc addicts but i would rather medals be attainable for the average person. Win Percentage - If this is pure win percentage. this is dumb i would never be a supporter unless it accounted for 8 player singles games and other game types like that. Unique Map Achievement - im guessing this is for playing many different maps, maybe winning many different maps either way i would way rather other medals Endurance - plain dumb Cards Achievement - escalating/flat rate/no spoils? if so lack has made it clear he wants medals to be for types of games people do not play often Score Plateau - interesting what are score requirements suggested for gold/silver/bronze if not too high i would support it but we need to remember the common player in these medals Battle Royal Recognition - like this one Diamond Medal - lets get platinum first Length of Activity on Site - dumb just like endurance medal, requires no skill just dedication Consecutive Victories - would be very hard for some players and i dont think people would get it fairly, instead they would just farm a bunch of games in a row to get it, or put off wins to get them all consecutively.

I do not think the CC community should be ignored, this has almost been 3 years now?????

Perhaps another mod, maybe ljex or someone can look into this and keep it active. There may be a few ideas here, that could be added, seems like a fair amount agree, who is going to take responsibility for looking after this?

If you think they are all no good, then LOCK it, if not, lets put it in an active forum.

Unique Map Achievement - im guessing this is for playing many different maps, maybe winning many different maps either way i would way rather other medals

no wrong-these is achivement on one specific(unique map)

unique map AchievementAwarded to members that won X time in one unique map,defeating 2 unique oponent per game.bronze 50 winsilver 100 wingold 400 win

Consecutive Victories - would be very hard for some players and i dont think people would get it fairly, instead they would just farm a bunch of games in a row to get it, or put off wins to get them all consecutively.

hard to farm,because you have rule to apply. Well ofcourse its will hard,its all ready hard for me, but for change some medals need to be hard for achivement.

Consecutive Victory AchievementAwarded to members that have X victories consecutively,defeat two unique opponents on each of X maps. Bronze-20 victoriessilver-50 victoriesgold-100 victories

For bronze you need to win 20 games, and to defeate 40 unique opponents, for gold 100 victories and 200 unique opponents(distributed to 2 unique opponets per one win minimum)ofcourse its possibile to cheat for these medal,but you need to have large numebr of players who will participiate in cheat.

Why is there not an option to add no additional medals? You start handing the shit out like toilet paper, they start to mean nothing. Seriously, up the limits for silver & gold and create some higher standards for tournament games - I don't see what the problem is, clan medals upped the norm from what clans had previously conducted wars on, why not ratchet up everything else. Seems like people want medals for just existing, seems stupid to me.

Unique Map Achievement - im guessing this is for playing many different maps, maybe winning many different maps either way i would way rather other medals

no wrong-these is achivement on one specific(unique map)

unique map AchievementAwarded to members that won X time in one unique map,defeating 2 unique oponent per game.bronze 50 winsilver 100 wingold 400 win

Consecutive Victories - would be very hard for some players and i dont think people would get it fairly, instead they would just farm a bunch of games in a row to get it, or put off wins to get them all consecutively.

hard to farm,because you have rule to apply. Well ofcourse its will hard,its all ready hard for me, but for change some medals need to be hard for achivement.

Consecutive Victory AchievementAwarded to members that have X victories consecutively,defeat two unique opponents on each of X maps. Bronze-20 victoriessilver-50 victoriesgold-100 victories

For bronze you need to win 20 games, and to defeate 40 unique opponents, for gold 100 victories and 200 unique opponents(distributed to 2 unique opponets per one win minimum)ofcourse its possibile to cheat for these medal,but you need to have large numebr of players who will participiate in cheat.

if this is the case then i would not be a fan of either of these medals implemented

Looks like it's for the player who won the most games in each gametype. Only 1 winner for each setting. This could be all right, but I'm going to hold off for now. If the player gets surpassed in wins, they don't lose the medal, do they? But the player who passes them gets a medal? And what if the original player gains the lead again? I just have too many questions here to vote Yes for it.

ljex wrote:Total Wins - as long as it is not too excessive i would be a supporter. Currently there are only 250 ish players active with more than 2500 wins so if this was say 5000 wins needed to get gold i would not be a fan. yes there are some cc addicts but i would rather medals be attainable for the average person.

I agree with that. 5000 is too high. Even if it was 2500, it would still be a tough call - not sure I love this being a medal. But as it stands, it is an easy choice. No for 5000.

ljex wrote:Win Percentage - If this is pure win percentage. this is dumb i would never be a supporter unless it accounted for 8 player singles games and other game types like that.

Definitely not voting for this. Win percentage is a bad statistic, and I doubt it would be feasible to account for the size of the game.

ljex wrote:Unique Map Achievement - im guessing this is for playing many different maps, maybe winning many different maps either way i would way rather other medals

This is interesting. "Awarded to members that won X time in one unique map,defeating 2 unique oponent per game." - So 1v1s don't count? Kind of a cool medal; you could see which maps players have played a lot. Seems incredibly difficult to reach 400...I don't know; it's a tough call. I'm gonna say No for now.

ljex wrote:Endurance - plain dumb

Meh. No thanks.

ljex wrote:Cards Achievement - escalating/flat rate/no spoils? if so lack has made it clear he wants medals to be for types of games people do not play often

I love this one, but I'm sure Lack won't do it. Still, I'll vote Yes.

ljex wrote:Score Plateau - interesting what are score requirements suggested for gold/silver/bronze if not too high i would support it but we need to remember the common player in these medals

I like this. You know what, Ljex? I think the idea that medals must be attainable by the common player isn't so great. I think it's good to reward the stellar players and be able to identify them easily. I may have to rethink the "5000 games won" suggestion... but for now, I'll vote No on that and Yes on this.

ljex wrote:Battle Royal Recognition - like this one

1 win for 1 medal? All right... sure. Voting Yes.

ljex wrote:Diamond Medal - lets get platinum first

Voting Yes

ljex wrote:Length of Activity on Site - dumb just like endurance medal, requires no skill just dedication

I agree with Ljex... No.

ljex wrote:Consecutive Victories - would be very hard for some players and i dont think people would get it fairly, instead they would just farm a bunch of games in a row to get it, or put off wins to get them all consecutively.

How sick would that be? If you reached 6000, you get 10 medals. Completely fine with me - score is a big part of CC, regardless of whether or not it shows if you are a good player. I love the idea of score having a big impact on medals. And having a system like mine would really show you how high a player got.

Maybe you thought a player reached Colonel, but when you checked his medals, you see that he only reached Major, and never got Colonel.

What do you think about this tweaking? I really think it's better than just having 3000, 4000, 5000.

Last edited by Commander62890 on Tue Jan 18, 2011 8:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Anyone care to explain what the score plateau medal is about?I would have no problem with all except two of the medal suggestions in the poll at this moment. The length of activity on the site of medal either needs exclusions or shouldn't be implemented at all because there are some players who have been in CC for very long but have notoriety for being a poor sport in a majority of their games, or often resort to cheap tactics to win and gain points/ranks.As for the consecutive victory medal, that is not hard to achieve if you are premium and play loads of team games (with your clan mates as fellow team members) against often unorganized opposing teams who don't know each others' strategy very well. IMO, if such a medal was approved, I would suggest separating it into different categories (ex. team games and non-team games) and count each one independently.I still promote my own suggestion of an All Star Achievement in the Bronze, Silver, and Gold categories. In order for someone to receive a Bronze All Star Achievement, they would need a bronze medal in all game medals, at least 3 community achievements (at least 1 tournament achievement, 1 general achievement, and 1 clan achievement), and at least 3 contribution achievements (at least 1 map contribution, 1 tournament contribution, and 1 general contribution). Silver and Gold would have the same concept.

what!!!!!!!!!!For all these f**** period,only one medal whas implemented!!!!!!11 jun 2008,these is date when these topic created, and these mean that every 2 years,one medal will be implemented!?!? These is so pointless. Again for some period(lets say 1 year) one medal will be implemented and poll will be again restarted(almost write retarded).Its these so dificlulty to implement more then one medal per year?

qwert wrote:what!!!!!!!!!!For all these f**** period,only one medal whas implemented!!!!!!11 jun 2008,these is date when these topic created, and these mean that every 2 years,one medal will be implemented!?!? These is so pointless. Again for some period(lets say 1 year) one medal will be implemented and poll will be again restarted(almost write retarded).Its these so dificlulty to implement more then one medal per year?