One Decade of Drone Strikes in Pakistan

Share

In May 2002, Gen. John Keane, commander of the 101st Airborne Division, vowed: “We have broken their will and they are trying to establish another safe haven now in Pakistan…when the time is right, we will deal with that one as well.” Indeed, two years later, his prediction came to pass on June 17, 2004, when a Hellfire missile killed Taliban commander Nek Mohammed, beginning the CIA campaign of drone strikes in Pakistan that continues to this day. One decade later, the United States has conducted a total of 371 drone strikes in Pakistan, killing an estimated 2,878, of which 376 were civilians.

Congressional overseers and former CIA officials describe the estimates listed above as being roughly accurate, although the categorization of victims remains contested, based upon how one includes the practices of signature strikes. Interestingly, these databases do not include all of the drone strikes that were revealed by the reporting of Jonathan Landry, including a May 22, 2007 strike conducted at the request of the Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate (ISI), Pakistan’s spy agency, to support Pakistani troops. The numbers that have been provided by different arms of the Pakistani government at different times also vary widely.

After a six-month lull in early 2014, while it seemed drone strikes in Pakistan may be slowing, they began again on June 11. Bringing the first decade to a close on June 17, 2014, the United States will enter into its eleventh year of drone strikes in Pakistan. Never before in U.S. history has such a lengthy and lethal military campaign been so inadequately described or justified by the government, which retains the fiction that these strikes are “covert” and unworthy of public examination. The vast majority of congressional overseers and citizens concur.

Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions.

Drones can never achieve elimination of terrorism. In fact they are fuelling it further. And this is the message of two recent novels. Sting of the Drone (Richard Clarke) is written from an American perspective. In comparison novel “Bullets and Train” written by Adeerus Ghayan ( http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00LJK7KZ8 ) is from a Pakistani’s perspective. Although this novel also discusses terrorism in the wake of drone attacks, it is better steeped in ground realities. Drones have become a matter of national issue in Pakistan and their impacts are far more reaching than imagined, something which is the central theme of this novel. Both of these novels need to be read side by side to provide the views of two very different worlds on the issue of “Drones”.

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.