Tactical Voting and Party Preferences: A Test of Cognitive Dissonance Theory

Tactical Voting and Party Preferences: A Test of Cognitive Dissonance Theory
Bølstad, Jørgen; Dinas, Elias; Riera, Pedro
2012-06-30 00:00:00
Studying the development of stable political attitudes, political scientists have argued that repeated voting for a political party reinforces initial party preferences, in a seemingly mechanistic process of habit-formation. However, the empirical evidence is scarce and the theoretical framework underdeveloped. Does the act of voting for a party improve an individual’s evaluation of this party? If so, is this effect simply due to habit-formation, or a more complex psychological mechanism? Drawing on cognitive dissonance theory, we examine the act of voting as a choice inducing dissonance reduction. We go beyond existing research, by focusing on tactical voters—a group for which the notion of habitual reinforcement does not predict an effect. The analyses reveal a positive effect of the act of voting tactically on the preferences for the parties voted for and may thus call for a revision of the traditional understanding of the role of voting in shaping party preferences.
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pngPolitical BehaviorSpringer Journalshttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/tactical-voting-and-party-preferences-a-test-of-cognitive-dissonance-4400XkV9vm

Tactical Voting and Party Preferences: A Test of Cognitive Dissonance Theory

Abstract

Studying the development of stable political attitudes, political scientists have argued that repeated voting for a political party reinforces initial party preferences, in a seemingly mechanistic process of habit-formation. However, the empirical evidence is scarce and the theoretical framework underdeveloped. Does the act of voting for a party improve an individual’s evaluation of this party? If so, is this effect simply due to habit-formation, or a more complex psychological mechanism? Drawing on cognitive dissonance theory, we examine the act of voting as a choice inducing dissonance reduction. We go beyond existing research, by focusing on tactical voters—a group for which the notion of habitual reinforcement does not predict an effect. The analyses reveal a positive effect of the act of voting tactically on the preferences for the parties voted for and may thus call for a revision of the traditional understanding of the role of voting in shaping party preferences.