On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Lennart Poettering <mzqohf at 0pointer.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 22.12.10 15:27, Scott James Remnant (scott at netsplit.com) wrote:
>>> These patches add support for service activation through Upstart.
>> Playing catchup, heh?
>> I cannot say I am particularly thrilled to see this. When I did the
> original patches I asked you for your original work, which you claimed
> you had, so that I could work on a common interface for systemd and
> upstart to handle activation. You never bothered to send me that and
> repeatedly made clear that you weren't interested in defining common
> interfaces, so that I ended up implementing my own systemd-specific
> stuff and got it merged.
>> Now after all that you do want this kind of activation hookup for
> upstart too, and now want to litter the D-Bus source code with multiple
> implementations which happen to be almost entirely identical except that
> a few strings are named differently.
>No, I was just too busy - and by the time I dug myself out of the TODO
list, you'd already sent in your own patches. Note that I have at
least tried to clean up your patch so it's at least a case of
extending an enum rather than extra arguments.
And I have at no point said I'm not interested in defining common
specs, all I've said is that I'm not interested in using your
interfaces as the common spec. I'm more than happy to sit down and
work something else that's fresh.
Scott