I didn't know today would be our last
Or that I'd have to say goodbye to you so fast
I'm so numb, I can't feel anymore
Prayin' you'd just walk back through that door
And tell me that I was only dreamin'
You're not really gone as long as I believe

There will be another angel
Around the throne tonight
Your love lives on inside of me,
And I will hold on tight
It's not my place to question,
Only God knows why
I'm just jealous of the angels
Around the throne tonight

The Newtown killings ought to occasion a little modesty and circumspection.

By Mark Steyn

Lullay, Thou little tiny Child, by by, lully, lullay . . . ”

The 16th-century Coventry Carol, a mother’s lament for her lost son, is the only song of the season about the other
children of Christmas — the first-born of Bethlehem, slaughtered on
Herod’s orders after the Magi brought him the not-so-glad tidings that
an infant of that city would grow up to be King of the Jews. As Matthew
tells it, even in a story of miraculous birth, in the midst of life is
death. The Massacre of the Innocents loomed large over the Christian
imagination: In Rubens’s two renderings, he fills the canvas with
spear-wielding killers, wailing mothers, and dead babies, a snapshot,
one assumes, of the vaster, bloodier body count beyond the frame. Then a
century ago the Catholic Encyclopedia started digging into the
numbers. The estimated population of Bethlehem at that time was around a
thousand, which would put the toll of first-born sons under the age of
two murdered by King Herod at approximately 20 — or about the same
number of dead children as one school shooting on a December morning in
Connecticut. “Every man a king,” promised Huey Long. And, if it doesn’t
quite work out like that, well, every man his own Herod.

Had my child been among the dead of December 14, I don’t know that I
would ever again trust the contours of the world. The years go by, and
you’re sitting in a coffee shop with a neighbor, and out of the corner
of your eye a guy walks in who looks a little goofy and is maybe
muttering to himself: Is he just a harmless oddball — or the prelude to
horror? The bedrock of life has been shattered, and ever after you’re
walking on a wobbling carpet with nothing underneath. For a parent to
bury a child offends against the natural order — at least in an age that
has conquered childhood mortality. For a parent to bury a child at
Christmas taints the day forever, and mocks its meaning.

For those untouched by death this Christmas, someone else’s bewildering,
shattering turn of fate ought to occasion a little modesty and
circumspection. Instead, even by its usual execrable standards, the
public discourse post-Newtown has been stupid and contemptible. The Left
now seizes on every atrocity as a cudgel to beat whatever happens to be
the Right’s current hottest brand: Tucson, Ariz., was something to do
with Sarah Palin’s use of metaphor and other common literary devices —
or “toxic rhetoric,” as Paul Krugman put it; Aurora, Colo., was
something to do with the Tea Party, according to Brian Ross of ABC News.
Since the humiliations of November, the Right no longer has any hot
brands, so this time round the biens pensants have fallen back on “gun
culture.” Dimwit hacks bandy terms like “assault weapon,” “assault
rifle,” “semiautomatic,” and “automatic weapon” in endlessly
interchangeable but ever more terrifying accumulations of high-tech
state-of-the-art killing power. As the comedian Andy Borowitz tweeted,
“When the 2nd Amendment was written the most lethal gun available was
the musket.”

Actually, the semiautomatic is a 19th-century technology, first
produced in 1885. That’s just under half a century after the death of
Madison, the Second Amendment’s author, and rather nearer to the
Founding Fathers’ time than our own. And the Founders were under fewer
illusions about the fragility of society than Hollywood funnymen: On
July 25,1764, four Lenape Indians walked into a one-room schoolhouse in
colonial Pennsylvania and killed Enoch Brown and ten of his pupils. One
child survived, scalped and demented to the end of his days.

Nor am I persuaded by the Right’s emphasis on preemptive
mental-health care. It’s true that, if your first reaction on hearing
breaking news of this kind is to assume the perpetrator is a male dweeb
in his early twenties with poor socialization skills, you’re unlikely to
be wrong. But, in a society with ever fewer behavioral norms, who’s to
say what’s odd? On 9/11, the agent at the check-in desk reckoned Mohamed
Atta and his chums were a bit strange but banished the thought as
shameful and discriminatory. In a politically correct world, vigilance
is a fool’s errand. The US Airways cabin crew who got the “flying imams”
bounced from a Minneapolis plane for flamboyantly, intimidatingly wacky
behavior (praying loudly, fanning out to occupy all the exit rows,
asking for seatbelt extenders they didn’t need) wound up in
sensitivity-training hell. If a lesbian thinks dragging your wife around
in a head-to-toe body bag is kinda weird, she’s being “Islamophobic.”
If a Muslim thinks taking breast hormones and amputating your penis is a
little off, he’s “transphobic.” These very terms make the point that,
in our society, finding somebody else odd is itself a form of mental
illness. In an unmoored age, what’s not odd? Once upon a time, TV
viewers from distant states descending on a Connecticut town to attend
multiple funerals of children they don’t know might have struck some of
us as, at best, unseemly and, at worst, deeply creepy — a Feast of the
Holy Innocents, so to speak.

Okay, what about restricting it to wishing murderous ill upon someone?
In her own response to the Sandy Hook slaughter, the novelist Joyce
Carol Oates tweeted that hopes for gun control would be greatly advanced
“if sizable numbers of NRA members become gun-victims.” Who’s to know
when violent fantasies on social media prefigure a loner getting ready
to mow down the kindergarten or just a critically acclaimed liberal
novelist amusing her friends before the PEN Awards cocktail party? As it
is, in American schools, mental-health referral for “oppositional
defiance disorder” and the like is a bureaucratic coding racket designed
to access federal gravy. Absent widely accepted cultural enforcers, any
legislative reforms would quickly decay into just another capricious
boondoggle.

It would not be imprudent to expect that an ever broker America, with
more divorce, fewer fathers, the abolition of almost all social
restraints, and a revoltingly desensitized culture, will produce more
young men who fall through the cracks. But, in the face of murder as
extraordinarily wicked as that of Newtown, we should know enough to
pause before reaching for our usual tired tropes. So I will save my own
personal theories, no doubt as ignorant and irrelevant as everybody
else’s, until after Christmas — except to note that the media’s stampede
for meaning in massacre this last week overlooks the obvious: that the
central meaning of these acts is that they are without meaning. Herod
and the Pennsylvania Indians murdered children in pursuit of crude
political goals; the infanticidal maniac of Sandy Hook was merely
conscripting grade-school extras for a hollow act of public suicide.
Like most mass shootings, his was an exercise in hyper-narcissism —
19th-century technology in the service of a very contemporary
sensibility.

Meanwhile, the atheists have put up a new poster in Times Square:
Underneath a picture of Santa, “Keep the Merry”; underneath a picture of
Christ, “Dump the Myth.” But in our time even Christians have dumped a
lot of the myth while keeping the merry: Jesus, lambs, shepherds, yes;
the slaughtered innocents of Bethlehem, kind of a downer. If the
Christmas story is a myth, it’s a perfectly constructed one, rooting the
Savior’s divinity in the miracle of His birth but unblinkered, in
Matthew’s account of Herod’s response, about man’s darker impulses:

Then woe is me
Poor Child, for Thee
And ever mourn and may
For Thy parting
Nor say nor sing
By by, lully, lullay.

Or that I'd have to say goodbye to you so fast
I'm so numb, I can't feel anymore
Prayin' you'd just walk back through that door
And tell me that I was only dreamin'
You're not really gone as long as I believe

There will be another angel
Around the throne tonight
Your love lives on inside of me,
And I will hold on tight
It's not my place to question,
Only God knows why
I'm just jealous of the angels
Around the throne tonight
You always made my troubles feel so small
And you were always there to catch me when I'd fall
In a world where heroes come and go
Well God just took the only one I know
So I'll hold you as close as I can
Longing for the day, when I see your face again
But until then

God must need another angel
Around the throne tonight
Your love lives on inside of me
And I will hold on tight
It's not my place to question
Only God knows why
I'm just jealous of the angels
Around the throne tonight

Singin' hallelujah
Hallelujah
Hallelujah
I'm just jealous of the angels
Around the throne
Tonight

Isn’t is ironic that the HOMICIDE RATE IS AT THE LOWEST IT HAS BEEN SINCE THE 1960s
and 49 states now have CCW laws enabling citizens to carry the means to
protect themselves (soon all 50 will given Illinois’ law has been held
unconstitutional by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals) and, yet, the
Assault Weapons Ban a/k/a The Prohibition On Certain Guns With Cosmetic
Changes That Make Them Look Skeery And Are Painted Skeery (And Racist!)
Black Act EXPIRED EIGHT YEARS AGO?

Remember the “holocaust” that Dianne Feinstein predicted would occur if the expiration of the AWB was allowed to happen?

Yeah, me neither.

As an Indian-American, Mr Zacaria, allow the words of Gandhi to penetrate your world of epistemic closure:

“Among the many misdeeds of the British rule
in India, history will look upon the act depriving a whole nation of
arms as the blackest.”

In 2011, the Department of Justice announced that the homicide rate in 2010 dropped to 4.2 homicides per 100,000 residentsAND,
THIS WAS SEVEN YEARS AFTER THE Assault Weapons Ban a/k/a The
Prohibition On Certain Guns With Cosmetic Changes That Make Them Look
Skeery And Are Painted Skeery (And Racist!) Black Act of 1994 EXPIRED.

Far from JUST being "The lowest US homicide rate in four decades," THE NATIONAL HOMICIDE RATE IN 2010 WAS THE LOWEST RATE SINCE 1909, according to collected data from the FBI, Census, state records, etc.

RWM: "No. 1764
- Greencastle, Pennsylvania: 4 Lenape American Indians entered a log
schoolhouse. Inside were the schoolmaster, Enoch Brown, and twelve young
students. Brown pleaded with them to spare the children before being
shot and scalped. The warriors then began to tomahawk and scalp the
children; killing nine or ten of them (reports vary). Two children who
had been scalped survived. 11 dead."

Allidunce: This kind of post promotes racism toward Native Americans.

RWM: Moron, it is the first school shooting/massacre in the American colonies.Should we not talk about gun crime when minorities are the killers?

[Evidently,
the answer is "yes." 453 school-aged children have been shot in
Chicago this year. 63 have died: That's 2.42 TIMES the number killed
at Newtown Since 2008, more than 530 people under the age of 21 have
been shot and killed in Chicago.

Murder in Chicago is, strangely,
a racist subject. The mainly MSM won't touch the subject because most
victims are black and they don't want to be accused of racism (Outrage
to the MSM: "Are you saying that blacks are more violent?!?!?! Huh?
Huh?"). To be fair, white also sells. Jon Benet Ramsey, probably,
would not have drawn the ratings had she been black. Just making an
honest observation, not an approval of such coverage.

The
Race-Pimps like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson will hue-and-cry about
Trayvon Martin, but a Trayvon is shot every day in Chicago...by another
Trayvon. We know what the problems are, but heaven help a Bill Cosby if
he dares to speak the causes that shall not be named.

I love the children of Newtown and Chicago and
I feel the pain that everyone does, but when is the MSM going to start
covering the deaths in Chicago and elsewhere. It is not an issue of gun
control. Chicago has had some of the most draconian gun control laws
in the nation.]

There has NEVER been a "workers' paradise" that
needed to build a fence on its border to keep people from
entering and the American Left’s “My Progressive Little
Ponyland” will not be the first.

By Bill Frezza

One
of the most fascinating characteristics of government borrowing -
whether at the local, state, or federal level - is that debts
contracted over time are obligations tied to specific geographical
boundaries but not to the citizens living there when those debts were
incurred. For example, while it's customary to say that each of the
210,000 residents of Stockton, California, are on the hook for their
share of the bankrupt municipality's estimated $700 million in unpaid
bills, the day one of them picks up and moves, personal responsibility
for that debt drops to zero.

Imagine if that type of tax "evasion" were eliminated. How would it change America?

Government debts are accrued on your behalf by elected officials for
whom you had a chance to vote, all supposedly representing your
interests. In a democracy, all citizens are obliged to pay the
government's bills as determined by the duly empowered taxing
authorities - regardless of whether they voted for a particular
officeholder or not. What's to stop legislators from passing laws that
make debt obligations due and payable by any citizen who decides to
leave for another jurisdiction? After all, they don't hesitate to take
your money when you die.

Mayors and governors of most tax-and-spend, heavily unionized,
low-growth cities and states are both desperate for revenue and tired of
watching disgruntled citizens vote with their feet. Think how
politically attractive it would be for them to make "economic deserters"
pay their "fair share" of old debts. I can see the arguments already:
"You can't move away from credit card debt or commercial debt, so why
should government debt be so easy to dodge?" Politicians could easily
win kudos from both public employee unions and the overtaxed residents
left behind, for the mere cost of enraging emigrants who won't be around
to exact retribution at the next election.

And can't you just see the progressive commentariat lining up behind a
movement designed to deter well-heeled blue state residents from
seeking refuge in those despicable red hinterlands? Like Glenn Close
rising from the bathtub to take one more stab in Fatal Attraction, don't
be surprised when death-spiral states resort to exit taxes as a last ditch effort to forestall their impending bankruptcies.

Exit taxes imposed on emigrants have a long history, including their
use in both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. They were imposed under
the theory that, since citizens were educated by the government and were
either provided benefits or allowed to profit from jobs and business
held while living under the government's protection, they were obligated
to pay back some of that money on their way out.

Sounds like something only a Hitler or Stalin would love? If only.
Try surrendering your U.S. citizenship and moving to another country.
Thanks to a series of expatriation tax laws passed by Congress dating
back to the 1960s, with the most recent revision sponsored by Rep.
Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) (no stranger to tax evasion himself), emigrants
leaving the U.S. must pay capital gains tax, including on unrealized
gains, across all their holdings marked to market as of the day of
departure. In addition, expats are liable for gift taxes on amounts
above $12,000 a year given to anyone in the U.S., for the rest of their
lives, even though they are no longer citizens themselves.

To date, the Supreme Court has had no problem with any of these laws.
So what is to stop, say, California from imposing exit taxes on the
steady stream of citizens heading off for Texas, Arizona, and Nevada?
More than 200,000 people flee the Golden State every year, taking their
money with them while leaving behind their share of the state's $617
billion in state debt, which comes to about $16,000 per resident. That's
$3.2 billion a year in tax evasion!

If presenting every deserter with a $16,000 bill proves too
unpopular, why not follow Uncle Sam's lead and make a grab for
unrealized capital gains taxes? California taxes capital gains at the
same rate as ordinary income - voters there recently passed a referendum
to increase the top rate to 13 percent - so a tax like that would bite
the richest nice and hard. That'll make those Silicon Valley
millionaires think twice before escaping to a low-tax state before
cashing in their shares! And who has any sympathy for them? After all,
they didn't build that.

Perhaps class warfare politicians in the U.S. are waiting for their
French role model to show them the way. French President Francois
Hollande, proud of jacking the top income tax rate up to 75 percent,
seems nonplussed about the fact that his wealthy subjects are decamping
for London and Belgium. Gérard Depardieu, France's richest movie star,
recently made the news not for a repeat of his classic performance of
peeing in an airplane aisle but for becoming a resident of Estaimpuis,
Belgium, less than a mile from the French border. Isn't it time to make
an example out of such economic villains?

Of course, if that fails, states could consider building walls and
posting armed guards at their borders. That's been tried before too.

19 December 2012

Author's Note: As my research has expanded, I will soon split this post into two sections. The next post, focusing primarily on knife crime, will be "The Battle Of Epping Forest" and, if you want to get into the mood: music &lyrics. XOXO, So Ro

M2RB: Leon Russell

It's one of those rules
That the greatest fools
Obey!

By Sophie Ro

After the 1997 shooting of 16 kids in Dunblane, Scotland, the United Kingdom
passed one of the strictest gun-control laws in the world,
banning its citizens from owning almost all types of handguns. In the minds of the
"Do Somethings!" and "Absolute Shalls," Britain
seemed to get safer by the minute, as 162,000 newly-illegal firearms
were forked over to British officials by law-abiding citizens. But,
this didn't decrease the amount of gun-related crime in the UKand it
certainly did NOTHING but cause overall crime to absolutely skyrocket.The
gun ban did not lower the overall murder rate, per se. In 1996, there
were 584 murders in the UK. The following year, there were 650. Five
years later, there were 1,048 homicides. In the UK, the murder rate has
now dropped to its lowest rate in 29 years, but is it because of the gun
ban? Some might claim so, but then let them explain why the murder rate
in the United States has dropped to the lowest rate since Charles
Whitman, who, unbeknownst to anyone, had a malignant brain tumour that
would have killed him before the year was out, went to The Tower at the
University of Texas, a "gun-free zone," in 1966 and
killed 13 people -- the first target was actually an 8-month old unborn
foetus, who was killed although not counted (that should make
pro-aborts happy) -- and wounded 32 others with an arsenal that included
a M-1 carbine, a Remington 700 6mm bolt-action hunting rifle, a .35
calibre pump rifle, a .30 calibre carbine, a 9mm Luger pistol, a 12
gauge semi-automatic sawed-off shotgun, a Galesi-Brescia .25-calibre
pistol, a Smith & Wesson M19, a .357 Magnum revolver, and over 700
rounds of ammunition -- arsenals and semi-automatics are not some new phenomenon, obviously.In
2006, the murder rate in the US 5.7 per 100,000 and was only 1.25 per
100,000 in the UK. Yes, the United States had -- and does have -- a
high murder rate, but that doesn't tell the whole story on whether it
has a more violent society than the UK or, at least, it shouldn't. In
that same year, there were 92,455 reported rapes in the US, which had a
population of 299.4 million, or 30.88 per 100,000 residents. In
contrast, there were 85,000 reported in the UK, which had a population
of 60.409
million. As a result, the rape rate in the UK was 140.71.

Murder and
rape are two violent crimes that are looked at in tandem as two leading
indicators of a society's penchant for and tolerance of violence.
Before we allow Piers Morgan to condemn the US because of the murder
rate, he must be made to explain the rape rate in the UK, as well as the
massive increase in gun crime after the ban and the skyrocketing jump
in the overall crime rate.Between 1998 and 2009, gun crime in the UK increased 89%. The UK has a higher overall
violent crime rate than the United States and even South Africa - widely
considered one of the world's most dangerous countries. In the 12
years following the gun ban, the number
of recorded violent attacks soared by 77% to 1.158 million - or
more than two every minute.By contrast, the US had a violence rate of 466 crimes per 100,000 residents and South Africa's rate was 1,677.

The
spiralling problem with gun culture was highlighted by figures that show 28 firearms crimes are committed in
England and Wales every day.

Home
Office figures showed gun
crimes rose by four per cent last year, the largest increase for three years.

There
were 10,182 firearms offences in the year to the end of September compared with
9,755 in the previous 12 months – an increase of more than 400 crimes, or more
than eight every week.

The
rise is the biggest percentage increase since September 2004, when figures
showed a five per cent increase in gun crimes.

While
gun-related deaths were down, from 55 to 49, the number of slight injuries, threats and non-injury
incidents linked to guns increased.

Victims’
groups were appalled by the figures in the quarterly crime statistics released
by the Home Office.

Norman
Brennan, a policeman who is spokesman for the Victims of Crime Trust, said
Government initiatives to tackle gun crime seemed to make no difference.

“Children
as young as 11 or 12 are carrying guns,” he said. “The sad reality is that it
is becoming so routinely reported by the press that a child has been shot that
the shock value has been eliminated.”

Police
chiefs said they were “concerned” about the rise. Bob Jones, the chairman of the
Association of Police Authorities, said: “This is an area police authorities
will want to monitor carefully.”

David
Davis, the Conservatives’ shadow home secretary, said: “These latest official
figures show that Labour is failing to combat both violent crime and its
causes.”

Mr
Davis said the gun figures were linked to a steep rise in drug offences – up 21
per cent in the third quarter of last year. The number of drug crimes was
55,700, against 9,500 in the same period in 2006."

The above two articles show what happened to gun crime and the overall crime rate - both violent and property - after the gun ban went into effect in the UK following the massacre in Dunblane, Scotland. This essay will attempt to show how many of us have not become safer since and are now at the mercy of criminals and a government that believes we do not have a right to self-defence. In fact, one might argue that the government believes your belief that you have a right to defend yourself is more dangerous than the criminals, who have "issues."

By 2010, the number of recorded sexual offences rose by 8% including a 15% jump in the
number of rapes against women, which rose from 12,100 to 14,000, the latest
Home Office figures showed. Meanwhile, in the ultra-violent, trigger-happy United States, the number of recorded sexual offences for the same year DECREASED BY 5%(since
the US includes deaths resulting from self-defence in its homicide
rate, I hope that more than a few of the bastards making the 2010 tally
were almost rapists, who got sent on their merry way to collect their 72 virgin goats, 69 virtual Victoria's Secret models, or whatever by one less rape victim.

According to the figures released by the FBI, the estimated number
of violent crimes in the United States in 2010 declined for the fourth consecutive year.
Property crimes also decreased, marking this the eighth straight year
that the collective estimates for these offences declined. According to the 2010 edition of the FBI’s annual report Crime in the United States, the statistics show that the estimated volumes of violent and
property crimes declined 6.0% and 2.7%, respectively, when
compared with the 2009 estimates. The violent crime rate for the year
was 403.6 offences per 100,000 inhabitants (a 6.5% decrease from
the 2009 rate), and the property crime rate was 2,941.9 offences per
100,000 persons (a 3.3% decrease from the 2009 figure).

In 2010, in the United States the total
number of crimes reported was 10,329,135. 1,246,248 of those were
violent crimes and 9,082,887 were property crimes. The US population in
2010 was 308,745,538; thus, the per capita rates for both types of crimes were: 0.404% and 2.94%.

In
2010, in the United Kingdom, the total number of crimes reported was
9.718 million. 3.808 million of those were violent crimes and 5.91
million were property crimes. The UK population in 2010 was 62,262,000; thus, the per capita rates for both types of crimes were: 6.12% and 9.49%.

I
agree and that's why they should be able to defend themselves without
the threat of a life sentence in prison, which is what happened to
farmer, Tony Martin, when he shot one of two home invaders to death
defending himself and his home. While self-defence was rejected by on
appeal, the conviction was reduced later to manslaughter on the basis of
psychological testimony that Mr Martin suffered from a "borderline
personality disorder" that manifested itself in a "phobia about people
breaking into his home." His tariff was reduced from life to 5 years
and he was released after serving 3 due to his good behaviour in prison.

There were 51 gun
deaths in the UK in 2011 a decrease of 18%, but the year also marked a
jump in the number of legally-held guns by 1.8 million so, obviously, more guns do not, necessarily, result in more gun deaths.

For some reason,
gun control advocates like Piers Morgan, the "Do Somethings!" and the "Absolute Shalls" in the
United States think that the fact that the UK has a lower rate of gun
deaths is something to celebrate in and of itself. But, is it really?
My questions to them are:

Does it really matter the manner of death is or what tool is used to kill?

If you are about to be raped, wouldn't you rather kill the MoFo before he assaults you or, in the very least, scare him away?

Would you rather have the deaths, including those from self-defence, from guns rate increase or the violence rate skyrocket?

In other words, do you want to be the statistic or would you rather it be your would-be perpetrator?

Are
not hammers, tyre irons, waffle irons, golf clubs, baseball bats and
fists all possible "assault weapons"? What would you rather have in the
middle of the night to defend your family against two home invaders: a
gun or a Louisville Slugger, which - to the surprise of few, who know
how the British governing class thinks - became the new "you don't need
that!" item during the August 2011 riots?

During the riots,
sales of aluminum truncheons and baseball bats skyrocketed, with some
items achieving sales 50,000% above normal. Amazon.co.uk was doing
unbelievable sales on these types of items because people wanted to be
able to defend themselves, which became increasingly necessary as the
Metropolitan police were told to stand down.

It's
that kind of insensitive, living-in-the-bubble asininity that roils the
blood of so many. People were not buying truncheons for sport so that
they could go out and take the heads off of some yobs. Most were inside
their homes cowering or were scurrying from home to work or market with
head and eyes facing downward, if they had to venture outside. There
were business owners, too, that tried to protect their life's work.
Despite the taunts of the feral children and the occasional Trustafarian tag-along looking for a good time, these
business owners were not "fatcats" and "the evil rich." Most were
working class immigrants, who were just trying to save their little plot
of prosperity and, for that, the dolers believed they deserved to be
destroyed and idiots like Stella Creasy thought that they should be
defenceless. " Just give way, my good man. The dole is always here. No
need for self-sufficiency! How crass anyway!"

After the gun ban went into effect, the increase in knife crimes and stabbings soared galatically. In 1977, there were 135 homicides using a sharp instrument including
knives and broken bottles, 33% of all homicides. In 2006/07, there were 271
homicides using a sharp instrument, the highest number since records began,
accounting for 38% of all homicides. In 2008/09 40% of homicides used a sharp
instrument, the highest proportion since records began. The number of fatal stabbings in England and Wales rose to the
highest total for at least 30 years. But statisticians added that this
was a
similar level to that seen in four out of the last six years and pointed
out that fatal shootings had fallen from 59 to 53 over the same period. The
supplementary volume of Home Office crime figures,
which cover homicides, gun crime and intimate violence also shows that the overall murder rate in England and Wales
rose by 2%. They also show
that "intimate violence" - which covers partner abuse, family abuse and
sexual assault - has been experienced by 30% of women and 20% of men
since the age of 16.

The British Crime Survey says that these figures represent an
estimated 4.8 million females who have been victims of domestic abuse
since the age of 16 and 3.2 million male victims. The figures show
that the most common murder weapon in England and Wales remains the
knife or other sharp instrument, with 35% of the 773 murders the result
of a fatal stabbing.

In 1997, the year Labour came to power and the gun ban passed, there were 4,489 prosecutions in England for knife crimes. By 2006,that figure had jumped to 7,699.

There was a 48% increasein serious knife-related hospital admissions between 1997/98 and
2006/7 and between 2003 and 2007 knife-wound hospital admissions for under-16s increased by 62.7%. This led the Home Affairs Select Committee in its report on knife
crime to speculate that the increase in serious knife wounds "may indicate
that knives are being used to inflict more serious wounds." In other
news, water is wet. Taking away guns does not take away the desire to
harm. People just find another way of inflicting the damage. I
know. It is a novel theory.

In 2008, the Home Office
releasedthe statistics for knife crimes for the 12 months
ending in March, 2008. To say that the figures were shocking would be an
understatement. The annual crime statistics showed that there were 22,151
crimes committed involving knives in ENGLAND and WALES only. This figure
did not include the estimated 250 fatal stabbings, which were recorded
separately. The data further showed that 231 were related to attempted
murders; 5,248 were cases of wounding with intent; 2,785 were related to
grievous bodily harm; 2,359 were cases of robbery to business premises and
11,528 were related to the robbery of personal property.

There has been a 120% rise in the number of children admitted to London hospitals suffering knife injuries

The number of knife homicides rose by
26.9% between 2005/06 and 2006/07. There were 270 knife homicides in 2007/08:
the highest total since the Homicide Index was introduced in 1977.

The real epidemic of knife and stabbings crime is, especially, felt amongst the under-16s in London and the, similar to gang violence in the US, it is one of the most underreported crimes in all of the United Kingdom, which is apparent when one compares the surgery or A&E visits with the number of police reports filed. The case is the same whether in England/Wales or Scotland (more than 70% of stabbing wounds or knife attacks treated in hospital go unreported and 50% of all knives found in Scotland are or Northern Ireland, the latter two keep separate records.Kniving has been seen on some of the islands, but not nearly at the level seen in the Home Counties and Glasgow.

Justine
Greening MP said NHS figures show there had been 34 emergency
hospital admissions of children aged under 16 with stab wounds in
2003/04. This figure rose to 75 admissions in 2007/08. Later records
also show more teenagers aged between 16 and 18 are suffering knife
wounds in the capital, with hospital admissions up from 129 in 2003/04
to 238 in 2007/08 - an 84% rise. The increases in London are far
higher than the national average,
which shows an 80% rise in under-16 victims and a 41% increase in 16- to
18-year-old victims.

The MP told BBC London: "We
all know of the tragic cases where people actually die from their
wounds, but for every one of those there are up to 14 cases where
teenagers are going to hospital for treatment but perhaps not going it
to police.

The UK outlawed the switchblade and gravity knife in 1959.

In 1988, possession of a pocket knife with a blade larger than 3 inches in public became illegal.

In 1996, it became illegal to sell a razor blade to anyone under the age of 16.

In 2007, you needed a licence to be able to sell “non-domestic knives.”

In 2008, a group of doctors called for a total ban on all long, pointed kitchen knives demanding that 17th century French laws decreeing that the tips of kitchen, table and street knives be ground smooth be adopted for both public eateries and in the home.

Wounds from kitchen knives can be devastating, but must we be protected from every danger? And, don't even bring up plastic knives. Those can get you arrested, too. Eventually, the NannyStaters will put the Luddites to shame and we will be eating with our hands like cavemen.

Knife attacks are costing the NHS an
astonishing £500 million per year, including A&E treatment, operating
arena, specialists, hospitalisations, surgery visitations, aftercare, physical
therapy, psychological treatment, and assorted family support care, should same
become necessary.

The bill for treating just one stabbing
victim can soar to £250,000 while only in hospital. Coupled with aftercare at a family surgery,
therapy, and A&E, a Department of Health spokesman has put the total of
treatment for a non-life threatening stabbing injury at approximately £1
million. £1 million would fund 2,146 new
hospital beds for a year or pay for 12,272 nurses or 21,600 hip replacements.

Last year, an official report found surgery
was being deliberately delayed so patients would go private or die before they
reached the top of waiting lists such was the dire financial condition of the
NHS and the overall Treasury. While
claiming it was in jest, Liam Byrne, the former Treasury Secretary under the
previous Labour government, left a note on the desk for incoming minister, The
Right Honourable David Laws, which said:
“Dear Chief Secretary, I'm afraid to tell you there's no money left.”

Surely, you jest, Mr Byrne. Gallows’ humour was more like it…and, as we
know, for those about to die, we salute you...r honesty.

While budget cuts have led to programmes that
are quite, literally, starving to death the elderly, infirm, those grievously
debilitated by dementia, Alzheimer’s, or ALS and even those with curable skin
conditions and broken legs, the epidemic of knifing crimes have begun to
consume a greater allotment of the NHS budget.
Obviously, not all stabbing victims have some culpability, but many do
since a great deal of the knifings occur by and between gang members or over
drugs.

Make no mistake, I am not arguing
that they should be left to die, but I do wish to bring a modicum of a
cost-benefit analysis to this discussion.
Yes, it is déclassé, a tad uncouth, and more than a wee bit
uncomfortable to discuss pounds and pence when debating the larger debate of
life and debate. But, as I tell my Progressive
American friends, who have dreams of sugar-plum fairies and Mary Poppins-type
nannies/nurses dancing and flying à la Danny Boyle in their “My Progressive
Little Ponyland,” which is of course a “gun-free zone,” when the government
runs healthcare , the bottom line IS the bottom line. “Free” and “unlimited” healthcare may grow on
trees in Utopia, but money doesn’t grow on trees in Realville.

Money is not the only issue. In June 2012, there were 2,637,799 patients
on NHS waiting lists for periods exceeding 6 months. Many on the list were awaiting treatment
for cancer, cardiac conditions, pulmonary problems, tumours, spinal injuries or
deformities, as well as more mundane, but still painful conditions like
degenerative arthritis, knee/hip replacements, ovarian cysts/endometriosis,
prostate problems, etc. It is not
surprising, then, that the UK has some of the worst cancer and cardiac survival
rates in the developed world. So bad
have been the waiting list problems that German and French private hospitals
have, periodically, taken tens of thousands of patients for treatment. Because of the exigent nature of stab wounds,
these patients take precedence over all of those on waiting lists.

Even as police estimate that 50%-70% of
stabbings go unreported, departments recorded 33,566 knife offences in England
and Wales in 12 months with 5,000 requiring admission to long-term
hospitalisations. One hospital, the
Royal London, has seen the number of serious stabbing cases presenting in the
A&E DOUBLE in five years. Much of
the knife crime the hospital sees involves young men as both attackers and
victims. Of the 312 people admitted to the
Royal London from A&E with knife wounds in March were aged between 13 and
24.Dr Mike Walsh, consulting trauma surgeon at the
Royal London hospital, said:

Several years ago, Rudi Hargreaves was a 22
year-old woman two months away from graduating with a degree in psychology from
Liverpool University when she began feeling nauseous, constantly full and
started to lose weight. Nevertheless,
she preserved. After graduation, she
returned to Hull, East Yorks, and began living her dream by working as a
teaching assistant. A few short weeks
later, her dream became a nightmare when she was forced to leave her job as her
weight and energy levels began to plummet.

After a consultation with her GP at the local
surgery, she was sent to a specialist, who diagnosed this young woman with
gastroparesis – paralysis of the stomach – which prevented the digestion of
food at a normal rate. Her once healthy
weight of 10st (140#) had shrunk to a skeletal 5st 10lb (80#).

This young woman, with so much promise, was
not without hope. Gastroparesis has been
successfully treated with gastric pacemakers for over a decade. The condition can be treated with a £14,000 ($22,613)
operation to fit a gastric pacemaker. Unfortunately,
hope is as vacuous a word in the NHS as it is in an Obama campaign.

HELP ME, I'M
STARVING TO DEATH!” – Rudi Hargreaves

“Sorry. ‘Experimental.’ 'Insufficient supporting information.' On the bright side, if you ever need a
gastric band for weight loss or £1,000,000 in treatment due to a stabbing wound
that you suffer in a gang fight, you know where to find us!”

And, if that
doesn’t turn your blood cold, know this: In 2006, Carol Davis, a diabetic, was
the first person to have a gastric pacemaker fitted. Another diabetic, Margaret Burns, from
Liverpool, received her gastric pacemaker less than 2 years later. So, it wasn’t exactly “experimental” and, at
least, 50 gastric pacemakers had been implanted – even for gastroparesis – BEFORE
Rudi Hargreaves was stricken.

The last
news that I have of Rudi Hargreaves is that people around the world were
raising the necessary funds for her to be treated at a private facility
(yes,
we have them). I hope that she had her
surgery in time and has recovered sufficiently to live the life that she
deserves. For the next gangbanger, who
picks up a knife, please consider the life that you destroy may not only
be the
one into which you plunge your pathetic phallic symbol. His "free"
healthcare or yours - when what goes around comes around arrives - will
cost the lives of people like Rudi or dozens, who have been waiting
upwards of a year to get treated for cancer or a heart condition.

According to the Crime Survey for England and Wales, there were a reported 29,613 knife crimes in the year ending in June 2012 with a 10% increase in knifing robberies alone, Before you ask, it is illegal to carry knives in the UK. I know. Why haven't people obeyed the law? 40% of all the murders of young people in the UK are committed with knives, but they are illegal. What's up with that?

Now, if you are a "Do Something!" or an "Absolute Shall" that looks at UK knife crime and still thinks it looks good compared to American gun crime, then just wait a few because a "knife crime" doesn't necessarily mean a stabbing. Under the Prevention of Crime Act of 1953, it became illegal to have an offencive weapon in a
public place. This included ''any article made or adapted for use for
causing injury to the person, or intended by the person having it with
him for such use by him or by some other person." The Restriction of Offencive Weapons Act of 1959 banned the carrying,
manufacture, sale, purchase, hire or lending of flick-knives and
''gravity knives." The Criminal Justice Act of 1988 contained a list of
prohibited martial arts-style weapons and made it an offence to carry an
article with a blade or sharp point in a public place. The Offencive
Weapons Act of 1996 made it illegal to sell knives to children under the age of 16.
The Knives Act of 1997 prohibited the marketing of combat knives. The Violent Crime Reduction Act of 2005 banned the sale of knives to anyone under 18. So, the govvie pretty much covered all of the sharpies, but the definition of a "knife crime" has been far more elusive because, for example, a sword, axes, and razor sharp "cat skinners" -- all have been used -- aren't knives.

So, as bad as the increase in
"knife" crimes was after the gun ban, it was nothing compared to what
happened to the "stabbings" rate.
In 2008, both the Government's Offending, Crime and Justice Survey and
the bigger British Crime Survey estimated that there were nearly 60,000
stabbings in England and Wales each year or a rate of 98.36 per 100,000
inhabitants.

How bad has the stabbing situation become in the UK AND, more importantly, the Nanny State need to micromanage safety? The "Do Something!" move is on to require pubs serve beverages in only non-shatterproof glass or plastic. Considering the fact that official figures show more than 5,500 people are attacked every year in pubs with glasses and bottles in England and Wales, will a ban on china and crockery follow when they become the chosen "weapons of war" by drunken brawlers?

Despite more laws banning more
objects and sales to various people, the rate of knifings, knife-related
crimes, and stabbings continued to increase.
Paradoxically, the sheeple of Britain demand more cowbell. Instead of demanding a right to defend
themselves, more police on the street, and stiffer prison terms (for example,
in 2010 only 19% of knife possession offences led to prison terms and the
average tariff was 4.8 months), many continue to demand more laws that criminals
aren’t going to obey anyway. So, now,
while it is quite conceivable that a woman can be detained or even arrested for
carrying a plastic knife back to the office (don’t laugh - more than a few have
been convicted for carrying a plastic knife in public even when they had no
illicit intent), she cannot carry a gun to save her life or ward off a
potential rapist.

The band Chelsea Grin's first EP depicts an image of a man bearing a Glasgow smile (or "Chelsea grin"). The term refers to the wound that results from slashing a person's face from the edges of the mouth to the ears. The cut, which is usually made with a utility knife or a piece of broken glass, leaves a scar that makes the victim appear to be smiling broadly. The practice is said to have originated in Glasgow, Scotland

"The appalling scale
of Scotland’s blade culture was laid bare by a surgeon , who warned
knife crime had reached epidemic levels.

Consultant Dr Jeff
Downie, surgeon at Glasgow’s Southern General Hospital, told how children as a
young as 12 are being permanently disfigured because of gang-related knife
crime.

"On average, the staff at the
hospital are dealing with one knife victim every six hours. Kids at this age should be worried about pimples but instead have horrible
scars across their entire face. They are the lucky
ones. Many suffer nerve damage, meaning they can’t move their face properly,
while other lose their sight. It’s
depressing when we see children who have to go through the rest of their lives
disfigured.”

- Dr Jeff
Downie, surgeon at Glasgow’s Southern General Hospital

Dr Downie, based in
the hospital’s maxillo-facial surgery unit, said the majority of his patients
were boys aged 12 to 19, and some were presenting with sword and machete
injuries.Kids at this age
should be worried about pimples but instead have horrible scars across their
entire face.

In April it emerged
Scotland’s booze and blades culture was costing the country’s health service
£400 million-a-year. The cost of treating knife
injuries in Glasgow alone is a staggering £6.5million a year.

“We’re seeing at least one so-called ‘Glasgow
smile’ a week - that’s where the mouth is slashed right round to the ear.”

- Dr Jeff
Downie, surgeon at Glasgow’s Southern General Hospital

It is estimated that
there are about 1,400 Scots injured in knife attacks each year, and only a
fraction of incidents are reported to the police."

The
United Nation's crime research institute said Scotland - true to course
- was the most violent country in the developed world. For all that
are hearing right now about the number of firearms in the United States,
Scots were determined to be nearly three-times more likely to be
victims of violent assaults than those living in America. Considering
the UK's ranking above, it is probably safe to say that Scots are much
more likely to be victims of violent assaults than those living in Austria, South Africa, Sweden, Belgium, Canada, Finland, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and France, too.

More than 50% of knives
found by the police in Scotland are seized in Glasgow. Stabbings
account for half of all murders. Every week, there is at least one murder by stabbing in Scotland. Since
the police believe that knifings are under-reported 50-70%, the true
tally of the carnage - while likely never to be known - was probably
more along the lines of 100 to 150....in one 3-day weekend. While
stabbings in Scotland aren't the sole cause of death amongst those in age groups not expected to expire, they do encapsulate the rough-and-tumble lives many a bairn, as precious and innocent as possible in his receiving gown, will grow to face in his likely very short life. According
to the World Health Organisation, a boy born in one deprived part of Glasgow is likely to die 28
years earlier than one born in a village just a few miles away, and will have a
life expectancy shorter than that of people living in India or the Philippines.

During
a 2006 bank holiday weekend, police received reports of 50 knifing
attacks. One victim, was Barry Wilson, who with his 3 children, were
returning home from an anti-crime day organised by the police. Mr
Wilson had spent part of the afternoon with his killer enjoying a few
pints and watching the children. When Wilson, who had been paying all
day, refused one last pint, he got the knife...in front of his children,
which is where he died.

The costs in lives, blood and treasure in Scotland alone are staggering. Scottish
Labour asserts that knife crime costs NHS Scotland an estimated £500
million ($805.40 million) a year. To put that into perspective, NHS Scotland had an operating budget of £11.35 billion ($18.283 billion) in the operating year 2010/11. It spent£373
million on orthopaedic services. NHS Scotland spent 25.4% more on
stabbing treatments than it did on ALL orthopaedic surgeries, knee/hip
replacement, spinal and disk procedures, drug therapies for arthritis,
physical therapy, etc. Furthermore, because of the emergency nature of
stab wounds, patients in excruciating pain on waiting lists are pushed
further down the queue.

Comparing Gun-toting US to Knife-wielding UK

Comparing
London and New York, cities of very similar population and demographics, the
rate of assaults and robberies is over six times as high, and 7 or 10 times
nationwide (depending on statistic used). In 2007, London accounted for more than one-third
of all admissions of children 16 and under being admitted to hospital
with stab wounds and saw the number of teenagers in need of
treatment increase rise by33%.

If
we want an even more apt comparison relative to guns and crime, we can
look at cities in the US where CCW is allowed with those where guns have
been banned. In 2011, Houston -- both the city and the state of Texas
have CCW laws -- had the lowest crime rate in 50 years. According
to FBI crimes statistics, the number of murders in Houston went from
269 in
2010 to 198 in 2011 -- a 22% decrease. By contrast, Chicago, which had
a gun ban, had 440 murders in 2010. Houston's murder rate in 2011 was
3.24 per 100,000 residents while Chicago's was 16.33 per 100,000
residents. The overall violent crime rate in both cities shows a
similar pattern. Among the nation's 10 largest cities, each with a
population of one
million or more, only Philadelphia had higher rates of murder and
violent crime than Chicago. It is three times as deadly as New York,
although Nanny Doomberg has his own problems given the crime rate is
rising in Gotham for the first time in 20 years,
and twice as violent as Los Angeles, both of which have strict gun laws
although not nearly as draconian as the ones that were in effect in
Chicago. Houston, on the other hand and to the disappointment of
gun-grabbers, is
one of the safer large cities in America as far as the violent crime,
rape and murder rates are concerned.

In 2003 - six years after the gun ban went into effect, data out from the UK showed that gun crime soared by 35 percent.

The Government's
latest crime figures were condemned as "truly terrible" by the Tories
today as it emerged that gun crime in England and Wales soared by 35%
last year.

Criminals used
handguns in 46% more offences, Home Office statistics revealed.

Firearms were used in
9,974 recorded crimes in the 12 months to last April, up from 7,362.

It was the fourth
consecutive year to see a rise and there were more than 2,200 more gun crimes
last year than the previous peak in 1993.

Figures showed the
number of crimes involving handguns had more than doubled since the post-Dunblane
massacre ban on the weapons, from 2,636 in 1997-1998 to 5,871.

Unadjusted figures
showed overall recorded crime in the 12 months to last September rose 9.3%, but
the Home Office stressed that new procedures had skewed the figures.

"The only word
for this is failure: the Government's response of knee-jerk reactions, gimmicks
and initiatives is not working and confused signals on sentences for burglary
will not help either.

"The figures
will continue to be dreadful until the Government produces a coherent long term
strategy to attack crime at its roots and get police visibly back on our
streets.

Gun
crime would not be cracked until gangs were broken up and the streets
"reclaimed for the honest citizen by proper neighborhood policing," he added.

"Gun crime would not be cracked until
gangs were broken up and the streets reclaimed for the honest citizen by
proper neighborhood policing" or so they thought. Gun crime increased by 89%
between 1998 and 2009. There are areas of the UK where gun crime is five times higher than it was before the gun ban. Gun crime had doubled, at least, in nearly 20 police areas. The Metropolitan Police now has replaced
some of the famously unarmed "Bobbies" with armed patrols on some
streets and, in a historic first, officers armed with "sub-machine guns" have been integrated into neighbourhood policing.I will say it,
again and again, I would rather live in a country where I am free and
armed than to reside in a nation where, as Senator Dianne Feinstein argues, guns are
banned so that a faerie tale and false promise of security of a "fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe" is "addressed." As we have seen, the "fundamental
right of Britons to feel safe" was not met when gun-grabbers left
law-abiding citizens defenceless and subject to the whims and vagaries
of those that are unswayed by the law. The Left tells us -- and, personally, I agree -- that the death penalty is not a deterrent. Well, neither are gun bans.

One more thing, in 2010, the homicide rate in the United States fell
to 4.2%.This rate was either the lowest
in four decades, according to the Holder Department of Justice, or the lowest
rate since 1909 according to long term statistics, including those from the
FBI, the Census, and state depositories.

The year 2011 marked the fifth straight year of a decline in violent
crime, which includes murder, rape, robbery and assault, and witnessed a 4%
decrease from the previous year, according to the FBI's Annual Uniform Crime
Report.In addition, property crime,
covering burglary, larceny and motor vehicle theft, edged down by just 0.8
percent, the smallest decrease in three years. Nevertheless, that marked the
ninth consecutive annual drop in property crimes.

Per FBI records, both violent crime and property crime peaked in the
early 1990s.Since peaking in 1992,
violent crime has fallen by 38% while property crime has dropped by 30.6% from
its high in 1991.Furthermore, the
number of violent crimes has decreased by 12% since 2006, which was the last
year marked with an increase, and property crime has dropped by 14% since 2002,
the last year that it increased.

What is quite significant about these numbers, especially in the
context of the current conversation about gun and "assault weapons,"
is that the Assault Weapons Ban expired in 2004.Bill Clinton, Dianne Feinstein, Chuck
Schumer, Carolyn McCarthy and Joe Biden would have killed to have a murder rate
as low DURING the 10 years of the existence of the AWB as it has been in the 7
years AFTER ITS EXPIRATION.

So, if the AWB didn't do it, what else could explain the dramatic
decrease in the homicide rate?

How about two:

1.The demand for crack cocaine
has declined.

2.Criminals might be thinking
twice about who they are going to attack considering:

In 1994, there was 1 state with UNRESTRICTED gun carry rights and 20
states with SHALL ISSUE CCW laws, 17 states with MAY ISSUE laws, and 12
states with NO ISSUE laws.

In 2011, there were 4 states with UNRESTRICTED gun carry rights and 37
states with SHALL ISSUE CCW laws, 8 states with MAY ISSUE laws, and 1
state with a NO ISSUE law -- and it (Illinois) just had its ban struck down
by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.

http://www.knifecrimes.org/uk-knife-crime-victims.html

Some recent knife crime stats:

During the year to June 2012 there were
approximately 29,613 recorded offences involving knives or other sharp
instruments, accounting for 7% of selected offences, a similar proportion to
previous years. The number of knife
offences recorded was 9% lower than in the preceding year.

With the exception of homicide the recorded
crime statistics had not previously separately identify crimes involving
knives. There were 200 homicides using
a sharp instrument in 2011/12, accounting for 39% of all homicides.

According to the Crime Survey for
England and Wales (CSES) in 2011/12 a knife was used in 6% of all BCS incidents
of violence experienced by adults, similar to the previous year’s proportion.

Since January 2010 the CSEW recently
has asked children aged 10 to 15 about their experiences of crime in England
and Wales. A knife, screwdriver or stabbing instrument was used in 11% of
violent incidents involving a weapon against children.

Over the year to the end of June 2012
there were 19,382 disposals given for possession of a knife or offensive weapon.

Juveniles (aged 10-17) were the
offenders in 17% of cases. The custody
rate was 10% for juveniles and 28% for adults.

A Court of Appeal judgement in May 2008
said that magistrates should normally sentence those convicted of knife crime
possession offences at the top end of the range. Following this custody rates and average
custodial sentence lengths have risen.

NHS data suggests there were 4,490
people admitted to English hospitals in 2011/12
due to assault by a sharp object.

Mad Dogs and Englishmen - Leon Russell
kids, planes, runway strikesflashy pimps and family fightsspotted dogs, blood shot eyesour space captain laughs and triesto understand the scheme of thingsbut just in time the scene has changedthe bus is here, bring the beerSherman's reading Shakespearemovie makers, boobie shakerssaxy airplane ticket takersunion members, Leo Fender's pride and joy, electric toyteachers, learners, incense burnersreligious leaders, chronic bleedersthieves and pirates on a rideit's a hippie commune BONAFIDE!!!!!! but Okies and Limeys, curtain climbers {{IT IS BONAFIDE-IStones and future Dominoesknow which way the wind blows JUST LISTENEDstolen cola no one knows, the shadow do AGAIN)but it's still a shady crew'cause I love her, and she loves youjust myself and forty friends in the name of Cocker powerout here on the road againwith Mad Dogs and EnglishmenMad Dogs & Englishmen - Noël Coward

In tropical climes
There are certain times
Of day
When all the citizens retire
To take their clothes off and perspire.
It's one of those rules
That the greatest fools
Obey,
Because the sun is far too sultry
And one must avoid its ultry
Violet ray.
The natives grieve
When the white men leave
Their huts.
Because they're obviously,
Definitely
Nuts.
Mad Dogs & Englishmen
Go out in the midday sun.
The Japanese don't care to,
The Chinese wouldn't dare to,
Hindus and Argentines
Sleep firmly from twelve to one,
But Englishmen
Detest a
Siesta.
In the Philippines
They have lovely screens
To protect you from the glare.
In the Malay states
There are hats like plates
Which the Britishers won't wear.
At twelve noon
The natives swoon,
And no further work is done,
But mad dogs and Englishmen
Go out in the midday sun!
Such a surprise
For the eastern eyes
To see,
That though the English are effete,
They're quite impervious to heat.
When the white man rides
Every native hides
In glee.
Because the simple creatures hope he
Will impale his solar topee
On a tree.
It seems such a shame
When the English claim
The Earth,
That they give rise
To such hilarity
And mirth.
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha,
Hoo, hoo, hoo, hoo, hoo, hoo, hoo, hoo,
He, he, he, he, he, he, he, he,
Hm, hm, hm, hm, hm, hm.
Mad dogs and Englishmen
Go out in the midday sun.
The toughest Burmese bandit
Can never understand it.
In Rangoon
The heat of noon
Is just what the natives shun,
They put their Scotch
Or Rye down
And lie down.
In a jungle town
Where the sun beats down
To the rage of man and beast,
The English garb
Of the English sahib
Merely gets a bit more creased.
In Bangkok
At twleve'o'clock
They foam at the mouth and run,
But mad dogs and Englishmen
Go out in the midday sun.
Mad dogs and Englishmen
Go out in the midday sun.
The smallest Malay rabbit
Deplores this foolish habit.
In Hong Kong
They strike a gong
And fire off a noonday gun
To reprimand
Each inmate
Who's in late.
In the Mangrove swamps
Where the python romps
There is peace from twelve to two,
Even caribous
Lie around and snooze,
For there's nothing else to do.
In Bengal,
To move at all
Is seldom if ever done.
But mad dogs and Englishmen
Go out in the midday
Out in the midday
Out in the midday
Out in the midday
Out in the midday
Out in the midday
Out in the midday sun!