At 17:08 19/02/04 +0000, Brian McBride wrote:
>Graham Klyne wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>I suggest we make an less-formal response for now (e.g. per [1]), and if
>>a problem remains when the draft goes to IETF last-call, we may consider
>>something more collective.
>>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2004Feb/0061.html
>
>That looks plausible to me. Anyone unhappy?
>
>Graham, does it help to have more folks chip in with "me too" messages at
>this stage?
Probably not. Better, I think, to debate the case coherently than make it
a political issue. Having Jeremy and Pat supporting my comments will, I
think, be enough to show it's not an isolated comment. We're not at the
stage of IETF last-call yet.
On the other hand, if people have additional comments to make that add
substantially to the debate, that's always welcome. (But please bear in
mind that this specification is in its final stages of being nailed down,
so any comments should be addressed specifically to the specification
rather than to broader issues, preferably with suggestions for improvement.)
If Pat agrees with the specific wording in [1] cited above (Jeremy already
has), then I'm ready to send it off.
#g
------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact