Promoted Stories

Comments (3)

Listen to Doncaster Rovers boss Paul Dickov claiming his team could have scored five in 2-1 win over Watford

bristol hornet says...2:08pm Wed 12 Mar 14

The "penalty" would have evened the scores and the number of players available to both teams! Then Anya's goal would have put us 2-1 in the lead. It is all very well saying they could have had 3, 4, or 5 in the end, but this was heavily distorted by such a ridiculous refereeing decision, which even Dickov and the Yorkshire media agreed was wrong.

The "penalty" would have evened the scores and the number of players available to both teams! Then Anya's goal would have put us 2-1 in the lead.
It is all very well saying they could have had 3, 4, or 5 in the end, but this was heavily distorted by such a ridiculous refereeing decision, which even Dickov and the Yorkshire media agreed was wrong.bristol hornet

The "penalty" would have evened the scores and the number of players available to both teams! Then Anya's goal would have put us 2-1 in the lead. It is all very well saying they could have had 3, 4, or 5 in the end, but this was heavily distorted by such a ridiculous refereeing decision, which even Dickov and the Yorkshire media agreed was wrong.

Score: 6

HornetJJ says...2:40pm Wed 12 Mar 14

The penalty incident decided the outcome of the game. If the "referee" had done his job we would have been the team in the acscendency and would have probably won. The fact that we were down to 10 men it was bound to catch up with the players as the game went on and that is the reason Doncaster had so many chances!

The penalty incident decided the outcome of the game. If the "referee" had done his job we would have been the team in the acscendency and would have probably won. The fact that we were down to 10 men it was bound to catch up with the players as the game went on and that is the reason Doncaster had so many chances!HornetJJ

The penalty incident decided the outcome of the game. If the "referee" had done his job we would have been the team in the acscendency and would have probably won. The fact that we were down to 10 men it was bound to catch up with the players as the game went on and that is the reason Doncaster had so many chances!

Score: 5

gloryhornet4 says...6:13pm Wed 12 Mar 14

bristol hornet wrote…

The "penalty" would have evened the scores and the number of players available to both teams! Then Anya's goal would have put us 2-1 in the lead. It is all very well saying they could have had 3, 4, or 5 in the end, but this was heavily distorted by such a ridiculous refereeing decision, which even Dickov and the Yorkshire media agreed was wrong.

Well said - even the Donny local rag said the penalty was blatant and were astounded the ref waved play on. As for 3, 4 or 5 goals - maybe relying upon incompetent refs to speak up a poor game from Donny is just silly. Dickov - you scored TWO - and your goalie got away with a rugby tackle and Renegade took studs to his hands and your No. 3 got away with that. Not content with that he pleads to get a fellow pro sent off. OK Dickov - you should have won by 10 if it makes you happy. You are a good bloke but if you have either of your cheating b's are in your side at next season I hope you go down. If not I hope you stay up. I didn't care about poor refs but after watching the oath at Bournemouth and the clown yesterday........... we do have it bad. FF and LM have both had balls over the line this year and the officials seem to fall asleep.

[quote][p][bold]bristol hornet[/bold] wrote:
The "penalty" would have evened the scores and the number of players available to both teams! Then Anya's goal would have put us 2-1 in the lead.
It is all very well saying they could have had 3, 4, or 5 in the end, but this was heavily distorted by such a ridiculous refereeing decision, which even Dickov and the Yorkshire media agreed was wrong.[/p][/quote]Well said - even the Donny local rag said the penalty was blatant and were astounded the ref waved play on.
As for 3, 4 or 5 goals - maybe relying upon incompetent refs to speak up a poor game from Donny is just silly. Dickov - you scored TWO -
and your goalie got away with a rugby tackle
and Renegade took studs to his hands and your No. 3 got away with that.
Not content with that he pleads to get a fellow pro sent off.
OK Dickov - you should have won by 10 if it makes you happy.
You are a good bloke but if you have either of your cheating b's are in your side at next season I hope you go down. If not I hope you stay up.
I didn't care about poor refs but after watching the oath at Bournemouth and the clown yesterday...........
we do have it bad. FF and LM have both had balls over the line this year and the officials seem to fall asleep.gloryhornet4

bristol hornet wrote…

The "penalty" would have evened the scores and the number of players available to both teams! Then Anya's goal would have put us 2-1 in the lead. It is all very well saying they could have had 3, 4, or 5 in the end, but this was heavily distorted by such a ridiculous refereeing decision, which even Dickov and the Yorkshire media agreed was wrong.

Well said - even the Donny local rag said the penalty was blatant and were astounded the ref waved play on. As for 3, 4 or 5 goals - maybe relying upon incompetent refs to speak up a poor game from Donny is just silly. Dickov - you scored TWO - and your goalie got away with a rugby tackle and Renegade took studs to his hands and your No. 3 got away with that. Not content with that he pleads to get a fellow pro sent off. OK Dickov - you should have won by 10 if it makes you happy. You are a good bloke but if you have either of your cheating b's are in your side at next season I hope you go down. If not I hope you stay up. I didn't care about poor refs but after watching the oath at Bournemouth and the clown yesterday........... we do have it bad. FF and LM have both had balls over the line this year and the officials seem to fall asleep.

Ipsoregulated

This website and associated newspapers adhere to the Independent Press Standardards Organisations's Editors' Code of Practice. If you have a compaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then please contact the editor here. If you are dissatisfied with the response provided you can contact IPSO here