For the second time in three months, Perth-based White supremacist couple and leading Stormfront Down Under members Baron von Hund (David Innes) and his partner Lilith (Peterson) have decided to abandon the sinking ship, taking with them only fond memoriesâ€¦ and er, a small amount of money donated to them by credulous fascists; donated, ostensibly, in order to sponsor their journey to this yearâ€™s fascist Sydney Forum. Whether or not Innes actually means it this time is difficult to say, as his last retirement was quite short-lived. If fair dinkum, however, Innes and Peterson will be the second and third online White supremacists to have retired so far this year (the first being war widowsâ€™ retirement village vandal Ben Weerheym) and the first scratching from this yearâ€™s Forum.

Well folks – we are outta here, [e]nough is enough for us. Weâ€™ve put up with an amazing amount [sic] of insult[s], threats and such over the years – and itâ€™s over.

No, we wonâ€™t be attending the Sydney Forum, and weâ€™ll be shutting down the [Down Under Nationalist Resource site]. The radio shows are over, and we will be deleting our contacts.

All the best.

Regards,
Baron von Hund.

As for the reasons why Innes and Peterson have decided to retire, at least temporarily, from the public eye, these may revolve around accusations â€” probably originating with ideological rivals Peter Campbell and Jim Perren â€” that the couple have in some way been acting as informants for FDB!. On the other hand, it may also have something to do with the coupleâ€™s ownallegations regarding the fitness â€” given that he is of non-White descent â€” of Dr James Saleam to lead the Australia First Party. Or perhaps itâ€™s due to the lack of support shown by AF members for their pursuing this line of enquiry on SF; especially the Perth coupleâ€™s erstwhile allies in another couple, Nichola and Rhys (â€™AustralianEuroâ€™) of Newcastle AFâ€¦

Sydney radio station 2GB will introduce new training procedures after three of its commentators breached racial vilification provisions of the broadcasting code, the broadcast regulator says.

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) said Harbour Broadcasting Pty Ltd, licensee of 2GB, “will introduce a comprehensive training program on vilification intended to ensure its future compliance with the code”.

ACMA said in its statement the training program met required compliance measures stemming from three investigations into the broadcaster during the past six months.

The investigations related to comments made by Alan Jones on his breakfast program, Brian Wiltshire on his late evening show and Malcolm T Elliott on his weekend program.

Jones and Wiltshire were found to have broadcast comments likely to vilify people of Middle Eastern descent and encourage violence around the time of the Cronulla race riot and retaliatory attacks in December 2005.

Elliott was found to have breached the Commercial Radio Code of Practice in comments he made about Indonesian judges during controversy over the jailing of convicted Australian drug smuggler Schapelle Corby and the so-called Bali Nine.

Earlier this year, ACMA found Jones had breached the code by making comments “likely to encourage violence or brutality” and “likely to vilify people of Lebanese background and of Middle Eastern background on the basis of their ethnicity”.

At the time, Macquarie Radio Network chief executive Angela Clark dismissed ACMA’s findings as “seriously flawed and ill-founded”.

She said 2GB and Jones were opposed to violence and had repeatedly said so on air at the time.

Comment was being sought from Harbour Radio on ACMA’s latest statement.

The regulator said 2GB had agreed the new training regime would be provided to all presenters, producers and on-air staff to ACMA’s satisfaction.

“These procedures will supplement the revised regime that the licensee of 2GB introduced in mid 2006 and means the licensee’s approach on this matter should better align with the code,” it said.

“The 2GB board of directors will formally review and approve the compliance program for implementation and the licensee will report to ACMA throughout the process on the development and application of the new regime.

“If ACMA is not satisfied at any time that the new arrangements will ensure compliance with the code, ACMA will revisit the matter to consider the heightened compliance options available to it.

“2GB accepts this position and has reiterated its commitment to meeting its responsibilities under the code.

“ACMA welcomes the considered and constructive approach taken by 2GB in developing a program of activities that specifically addresses ACMA’s concerns.”

The patients’ actions followed revelations that Czech-born gynaecologist Roman Hasil botched a series of sterilisations on women at the hospital.

He fled New Zealand in March and Health and Disability Commissioner Ron Paterson is investigating.

Since then, some staff have been racially abused and three patients have cancelled operations.

Mr de Bres said it was the duty of the health boards to deal with that type of behaviour. “It is absolutely incumbent on the district health boards to ensure their staff are not subject to any sort of racial discrimination.”

He said that if staff felt that was not happening, they could complain to the commission and they would take the issue up with the board.

“The principle issue for us is to ensure that the board is taking the appropriate action to ensure that it’s clients are not discriminating or showing prejudice towards their staff – it’s simply about a safe workplace.”

Mr de Bres said if patients continued to discriminate against staff because of their race then normal practice was to not offer the service to that person.

However, he said in the health situation that would be “difficult”.

“Nevertheless I think the board has to seek assurances from its patients that they will treat their staff with respect – unless their staff do something wrong.

What an exciting week it’s been Race fans! In the faraway online kingdom of everyone’s favourite Pioneer Little Europe, Stormfront (SF), there’s been hardly enough space to contain the outpourings of manly Aryan love, and weird scenes abound inside the kkkomedy gold mine that is SF Down Under…

It all started with David Innes (better known as Baron von Hund, the consort of temptress/moderator Lilith) asking a few pertinent questions of Sydney-based Australia First (AF) Fuehrer Jim Saleam, such as ‘What sort of manly Aryan name is “Saleam”?’ Jim didn’t reply, and so he was banished to the Opposing Views (OV) section of SF. Baron gloated — but alas! — the unfaithful sockpuppet Rhys started a thread in OV in which Jim could defend his good, completely non-Arabic, 100% Aryan name from Baron’s scurrilous accusations.

In the meantime, Dr. Jim was engaged in a few political machinations of his own, such as organising the expulsion of long-time party stalwart Darrin Hodges as a “Christian Zionist”. The fact that Dazza had announced he wanted to have Jim’s job as NSW councillor for AF had nothing to do with his getting the boot, of course. (Christian Zionism is a belief shared by some fundamentalist Christians that the Jews must return to Israel in order for the prophecies of Revelations to kick off. It requires no particular sympathies for the Jews themselves.)

So, having successfully washed his hands of Dazza, Jim proceeded to reply to the questions posed to him on SF… well, not quite. You see, unfortunately for his dear readers, all of Jim’s replies were in Jimspeak, an idiolect based on the production of long rants, which circle the subject of discussion, but never actually descend to the ground. Unsurprisingly, the noble Baron froths at the mouth at Jim’s refusal to speak English, and writes some very unkind and misspelled words in response, including one gem of a post in which he asks “If you are European in decent, how do you explain your Arabic surname?” not once, twice, or thrice, but nine times in total.

All good stuff, but there’s a subtext to this amorous exchange between Jim and Dave. You see, there’s a number of fash out there that kind of sympathise with Jim. SF, however, has a slight problem with the free expression of differences, even on OV, and anything remotely critical of Baron von Hubby is almost invariably deleted by The Mighty Lilith. We’ve pointed this out previously, but since then SF stalwart and Sustaining Member Wodensvolk — fan of both Donald Duck and Adolf Hitler — has even had his account disabled.

Shock! Horror!

Which prompts the question: how long will it be before Don Black provides Mr. Thompson with a refund? And why was Crazy Carl dumped anyway? If you read SF, you wouldn’t know, but thanks to the hard-working gnomes in the ZOG archives, we do.

Wodensvolk
Account Disabled
“Friend of Stormfront”
Sustaining Member

I have just read in another place that Baron from Dog has decided to not attend the Sydney Forum.
Is this correct?
I ask this publicly because the claim has been made publicly in another place, so requires a response that all can see.
Re the Baron’s thoughts in the above post: it should not be forgotten that it has been the Baron who has threatened violence against people and bad mouthed National Socialists such as myself by calling us Nutzis.
He should not be surprised when people react in a hostile manner to threats and insults.
Kick a dog and then wonder why when it bites you. Humm.
I shall never forget the evening on a chat programme that Herr Baron told me that my soul was stained with evil and that I had no place in the white struggle.
There is a way to make friends and that is not it.
I would like, very much, for the Baron to attend the Sydney Forum.
I want to hear what he has to say.
Perhaps he can justify his position. If so, I would like to hear his argument.
All the best…

Indeed, because of this and other deletions, the thread in question has become little more than a cheer squad for Baron von Lilith; as, in fact, has SF DU as a whole.

Meanwhile, a little further out on on the neo-Nazi traps, Dazza (Darrin Hodges) has turned Jim into another target — alongside of Muslim Invaders From Outer Space — on his ‘voiceoftheshire’ blog (As Seen on TV!). There’s some choice cuts here folks, like…

The highish churn in far right politics allows Jim to trot out the same bullshit every couple of years to massage new ears, [while] the old hands have heard Saleam repeat it over and over. I suppose Saleam believes if you repeat something often enough, it will magically come true…

And over at ‘whitelawtowers’, Jim Perren and Peter Campbell have been greatly enjoying laying their cowardly boot into Innes, and making thinly veiled threats regarding what might happen should His Highness actually scrape together enough of other people’s money for he and the missus to attend the Sydney Forum.

We must ask why it is not allowable to attack Mathew Henderson-Hau and the Fight Dem Back Criminal Gang nor EVEN mention them and yet members of White Pride Groups are constantly attacked and vilified by the boofheaded W.A. Stormfronter and his manipulative moderator wife Lilith. What little deal has been made between Innes and Henderson-Hau? Innes will claim that FDB have subjected him to criticism by listing him on the front page of FDB. But as staff at Whitelaw Towers have been made aware this is just a cover he uses. In his own twisted logic he would consider it an important part of his online image and the perfect cover.

Not true, Your Honour!

And finally, over on the forums we-don’t-know-about-because-they’re-vewy-vewy-secwet (ssshhh!), the boys can’t decide who they hate the most: Jimbo, or Davey? The consensus seems to be changing daily. We read that you just have to breathe and some fash has been disabled on SF, somebody’s switched allegiance, or some other pair of schmucks has kissed and made up. Latest in is that Pete and Jim have held out an olive branch to Innes. Oh hang on — no they haven’t.

Now there is two ways this can go, Baron could shut his mouth show up at the forum or he can escalate… We are going to stay silent on this for now for the sake of the Forum. Show some backbone Baron and do the same.

In the end, while Dr. Jim has provided some classic lines on the OV thread — and made Baron look like the illiterate fool that he is, and Jim the forgiving fuehrer — he still hasn’t answered the frigging question!!!

Meanwhile, in the alternate universe where everybody is getting along and getting it on…

Amidst all the fighting, we believe we have detected a Romeo & Juliet-esque tryst a-brewin’.

On Stormfront, David Innes writes of his detractors (specifically Trevor Lewis – remember that guy?):

I’m flattered by all this attention – but deeply concerned that they can’t accept that I’m already happily in love, secure and happy without their additional worshipping … You guys are infatuated, lusting for and deeply in love with me…you’d all just fade away into the night if it wasn’t for people like me for you to talk about and defame, insult and blame for all your own short comings. It must be terrible to feel so insignificant that you must spend so much time talking about me on Internet Forums and no-one bats an eyelid at your pitiful existence.

While elsewhere, Trev replies:

Don’t make me laugh. I am not the one that cannot string one sentence together nor am I the one that relies on my missus to protect me from my detractors. The point of the thread is to show the double standards on SF DU but you are too ****ing stupid to see that. Anyway, unlike you I work for a living and as such I have limited free time but with the time I do have I make good use of it.

Unlike you I do have real friends in the WN movement and not just 15 year old school kids but men that have been around for longer than five minutes. Not one bloke I know in the movement thinks that you are a WN, in fact all of them think that you are either a complete idiot or a distraction for the school kids to keep them away from those of us that have more than one brain cell unlike yourself.

Having a piss-up BBQ once a month flogging your **** does not make you a WN just an alcoholic ****head. As for your radio ‘show’, this just shows how much time you have on your hands (so what are you on the DSP or the dole?) and yet you still sound like a drugged up mongoloid.

Anyway, I cannot wait until you make a complete goose out of yourself in August. I just hope that someone has a video camera that catches the moment that you are totally humiliated and you are forced to go back to felching for a living instead of getting the begging bowl out to rip off kids.

A Maori man who sued one of Sydney’s most popular pubs and its bouncers after he was denied entry because of his racial background has been awarded a $5000 payout.

Scruffy Murphy’s was yesterday ordered to pay New Zealander Marcellus Cook $2500 in damages for banning him under its race exclusion policy, which applied to people of Middle Eastern and Pacific Islander appearance who were not known to the pub.

The hotel’s publican, Malcolm McGuinness, introduced the policy in November 2005.

Its contracted security company, T&B Corporate Security Services, was also found to have breached the Anti-Discrimination Act and must pay Mr Cook $2500, the Daily Telegraph reported.

The ruling against Mr McGuinness and the security company’s director Tibi Brandusiou was handed down in the Administrative Decisions Tribunal’s equal opportunities division yesterday.

Samoan Benji Tupou and Mr Cook both told the tribunal they were refused entry by security staff who were transparent about the reasons.

“Seriously boys, I don’t know how to say this, but you guys can’t come in to the hotel.”

“No Islanders or Lebanese,” the security guard allegedly added.

Mr Cook told the newspaper he was pleased with the tribunal’s decision after the humiliation of being banned from the pub.

“The decision confirms that the hotel’s policy to exclude patrons simply on the ground of their race is against the law,” he said.

“It is important that the tribunal has found that both the hotel and its security guards were responsible for what happened to me.”

In also finding Scruffy Murphy’s race exclusion policy to be a breach of the Anti-Discrimination Act, the tribunal recognised that Mr McGuinness conceded the policy was in place when Mr Cook tried to get in to the pub.

Thereâ€™s a ding-dong battle going on at Stormfront at the moment, wherein Dr James Saleam has been called upon to defend his honour, currently under assault by a crazy cat lady named Lilith and â€” peeking out from behind her skirt â€” a fiercesome Aryan Warrior named David. This dynamic duo are the leading propagandists for Don Blackâ€™s Internet business â€˜Down Underâ€™, while Saleam is currently fuehrer of the Australia First Party (AF). (For more on the squabbling factions, see 2007 Sydney Forum : Phantasy vs. Reality.)

The person responsible for creating the Battlefield Thread is from Newcastle AF, has a fascination with exotic currencies, an unhealthy addiction, and a determination to allow Herr Doktor one â€œfinalâ€? opportunity to clear his good name; a name besmirched by his being relegated to that segment of Stormfront reserved for non-whites silly enough to bother arguing with the dimwits who congregate there. Among other matters of concern to beleaguered whiteys, apparently, is Jimâ€™s past, â€œweather criminal or notâ€?, and its effects upon public perceptions of the otherwise sound political institution that is the AF; his ethnic derivation (or as David puts it: â€œIf you are European in decent, how do you explain your Arabic surname?â€?); Darrin Hodgeâ€™s unceremonious dumping from the Party â€” after declaring his intention to contest Jimâ€™s position; and finally, Jimâ€™s relationship with Ross May (â€?Why do you keep letting â€˜The Skullâ€™ hang around when it causes more harm than good?â€?).

Duh.

In reply, Herr Doktor, being a scholar if not a gentleman, decides to baffle them all with bullshit. He even quotes Georges Sorel:

Are my views â€œmisunderstoodâ€?? In general, I remember the quote of Georges Sorel: that nothing gives greater pleasure in being understood by intelligent people than by being misunderstood by blunderheads.

Present company excepted, of course.

A picture is worth a thousand words

In response to Lilithâ€™s republication of a grim-faced mugshot of Jim, he claims itâ€™s a forgery (which would appear to be pointless), predictably reiterates his innocence, and claims instead that he was framed by the political police for the crime of which he was convicted in 1991 and for which he was sentenced to four and-a-half years jail as punishment. â€œI was framedâ€? is a line decided upon many years ago and proclaimed from the moment Jim stepped out of prison in 1994, thirteen years ago. So too, his line (or should that be â€™scriptâ€™?) concerning his attempts to clear his name, the fruits of which are surely bound to ripen at any moment now: â€œI am currently preparing an application to the Supreme Court to overturn the conviction won against me by the corrupt Special Branch in 1991.â€? ~ June 18, 2007.

Yawn.

A Tempe man who spent four years in jail over the 1989 shotgun attack on the home of African National Congress representative Eddie Funde has embarked on a campaign to clear his name.

Jim Saleam, 39, a former state and national chairman of the right wing political group National Action, claims he was framed by police. Released from jail in May, he is now in the process of gathering evidence to support his claim and plans to lodge an application for judicial review in the NSW Supreme Courtâ€¦ ~ Scott Tucker, â€˜Jim fights to clear his nameâ€™, The Glebe, July 12, 1994

Of the second photograph of Jim wearing Nazi insignia, he claims that this photo â€œof itself could be any number of things. It is a matter of context.â€? Soâ€¦ it could be a pink elephant riding a unicycle; itâ€™s really all a matter of â€˜contextâ€™.

In reality:

Channel 0-28 had planned to run a story on the Progressive Nationalist Party [one of the myriad of short-lived, far right groups of the late â€™70s/early â€™80s], which they began to film before National Action had been formed. Pretty soon we realised that the producers had done their homework, and they claimed to have an article Jim had written for the West Australian Hungarian Nazi journal Perseverance from the mid-seventies.*

However much I disliked Jim, I didnâ€™t want one of his indiscretions to rebound on the party [National Action], and so organised a cover-up. I told Jim to have the original faxed to him from the National Library in Canberra. I rewrote it, toned it down, had it printed up as a leaflet, carried it around in my back pocket for a few days to age it, rang up Mum in Melbourne to send me one of my files as a cover, then took the leaflet to the TV station with a perfectly sound explanation â€” Jim had written a thoroughly respectable student nationalist leaflet that had been picked up somehow by the Nazis and then rewritten to make it more acceptable for their readership.

Which was fine, except that the journalists then produced photographs of Jim wearing a swastika armband, taken at an anti-Pinochet demo in 1975. Jim was not happy when they opened the photo album. I was appalled. He had always insisted that he had never been photographed in uniform. These things were importantâ€¦

[Some weeks or months later] As Dave [Merrett] and I chatted outside Woolworths, a sheet of newspaper blew across our path. It was from the Australasian Spartacist, one of those queer coincidences that provide a little amusement, but our amusement was squashed flat when we turned the sheet over and saw the photo of Jim in Nazi uniform, along with a recent picture of him at the bookstall at the University of New South Walesâ€¦

When I got home, Jim was moping around. He became distraught when I showed him the photos. That was it. He was going to sue the Spartacists for libel. After he had quietened down, I told him I felt that in the best interests of the party he should step down from his positions for good. He wouldnâ€™t hear of it. Iâ€™d obviously supplied the photo to the Sparts, he said. I hadnâ€™t, but he was unconvinced. In his typical fashion, he was searching everywhere to attribute blame rather than face up to the fact that he was the one stupid enough to pose in a Nazi uniform alongside Ross May. ~ David Greason, I was a teenage fascist, McPhee Gribble, 1994, pp.283â€“284, 289

To cut a too-long story short â€” Saleam does enjoy his waffles â€” Iâ€™ve got absolutely no idea what Herr Doktorâ€™s diagnosis is, nor do I understand his treatment. Well, apart from intimating, in some vague fashion, that there are dark forces at work behind the scenes which seek to undermine AF â€” and that Hodges, in some, typically unspecified manner, is somehow embroiled in these nefarious activities. Or: â€œIt seems to me that the issue of Mr. May was raised as another part of a long running campaign against Australia First.â€?

Itâ€™s a conspiracy!

Oh, and Herr Doktor notes that May will, as usual, be attending the Forum.

Finally, in a rather comic note, Lilith Peterson, for some bizarre reason best known to herself, imagines that sheâ€™s a man, â€œsick of what is happening to [t]his countryâ€¦ an average bloke [who] works hard [and] has a couple of kidsâ€?; one who, like her, is full of complaints, and really â€œ[d]oesnâ€™t like what is going on around himâ€?. Our imaginary Mr. Average then encounters some AF propaganda and, intrigued, googles the name â€œJim Saleamâ€?. What does he find? According to Lilith, â€˜The Tale of Jack and Jimâ€™, some of Jimâ€™s writings, and an article from the Green Left Weekly.

* â€œPerseverance is printed in Australia, but largely aimed at a Canadian and US readership. Perseverance is a vehicle for the Arrow Cross, the Hungarian fascist and Nazi-collaborationist party of the 1940s. It is edited by elderly members of that group and a second generation of followers. In the pages of 1990s issues of the periodical, can be found an article by the [Canadian League of Rights] (entitled Canadian News), and in another issue, the CLRâ€™s book catalog, sharing the pages with articles by Ernst Zundel, Louis Beam of the Aryan Nations, Robert Miles of the KKK and Identity, as well as articles by the original leadership of the Arrow Cross, and by German Nazi leader Joseph Goebbelsâ€¦â€? ~ â€˜Jew-haters and red-baiters: The Canadian League of Rightsâ€™, David Lethbridge, AntiFa Info-Bulletin, February 2, 1999

Google actually acting on their Terms of Service? It’s true! From the AJN:

Google gag for anti-Israel site
PETER KOHN

AN Australian-based anti-Zionist and Holocaust-revisionist website has had its advertising privileges restricted by major internet companies.

According to the Jerusalem Post, the ZioPedia site, on which a man who accosted Nobel laureate Elie Wiesel in a US hotel gloated about the encounter, has been barred from using Googleâ€™s AdSense, as well as donation accounts at PayPal and StormPay for the past few months.

Google Australiaâ€™s head of corporate communications, Rob Shilkin, told the AJN that in late May, ZioPedia was removed from Googleâ€™s AdSense service, which places Ads By Google on websites in a revenue-sharing exercise.

â€œWe terminated their AdSense account because we donâ€™t let in publishers of racially-intolerant material,â€? Shilkin said.

â€œWe commend Google for taking strong measures against the ZioPedia website. While as a western democracy we must uphold our core values, including freedom of speech, there are instances when the protection of all members of our community takes precedence.

â€œIt makes no difference if itâ€™s protection from physical assault or vilification,â€? he said.

On its website, ZioPedia described the moves by Google, PayPal and StormPay as â€œobscene political pressure by the Zionist mafiaâ€?.

Founded in May 2006 by the Sydney-based Rebel Media Group, ZioPedia is an online encyclopaedia and a collection of blogs discrediting the Holocaust and attacking Jews.

The writers, who are mostly Jewish [not the last time we looked, but okay], say Jews exploit the Holocaust and antisemitism to control western media and public opinion.

â€œThe goal of ZioPedia is the dismantling of the Jews-only state and its replacement by a free, united, secular, democratic, egalitarian Palestine,â€? its editor and publisher, Andrew Winkler, said.

â€œAs far as the Zionist settlers are concerned, we agree with the Iranian president, [Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad, that it should be left to the Palestinians to decide whether to allow them to stay.â€?

In February, Israelâ€™s Haâ€™aretz newspaper reported that Wieselâ€™s attacker, who assaulted him in the lift of a San Francisco hotel, posted details of the incident on ZioPedia.

Mediawatch has tackled the issue of race hate & the mainstream media again. See the video here.

For those eager to express their prejudices, there are plenty of new forums in the new media.

The major metropolitan papers have embraced the electronic era and they actively encourage their readers to respond to stories online.

Like this one.

Security staff at one of Sydney’s most popular pubs were ordered to refuse entry to patrons of particular ethnic backgrounds in a racist exclusion policy designed to cut crime…denying entry to patrons of Middle Eastern and Pacific Islander origin.