Being part of a group that follows the industry, the ratings are almost inconsequential since a lot of the times we already have a good idea of what to expect before a game even comes out. If it's a game or series I'm completely unfamiliar with, watching trailers and checking the ESRB website or commonsensemedia.org for more detailed descriptions on the rating is better than saying "Under 13? No T-Rated games for you!".

No. I would not use content ratings. I would use sources other than content ratings to determine if a game is appropriate. "Too severe" seems real subjective so my response falls right in-between the last two options.

Me and my wife have a pretty open policy when it comes to what my kids(when old enough) can play, we are going to take it on a case by case basis. Me, being savy enough when it comes to games and the content there-in will look at the game assess it and decide if my child is mature enough to digest that content, if not no matter what the box says, they are not going to play it. Key things I will look at is how gory/violent a game is and rather or not it has nudity. If it is a game I have no info on I will do research or have them play it in front of me for a while to get a good Idea.

No I won't but this is assuming I still play games in the future and I can watch some videos of anything my kid wants before I buy it. Growing up the ratings didn't always make sense, or weren't properly justified, so I'd rather make up my own mind about it.

But ultimately, once my kid is like 10-12, there is nothing I can do to stop him from seeing or playing the shit he wants, I would know from experience. So I hope I remember that whenever I have a kid and I don't seem too harsh with content. I don't mind being the strict disciplinarian dad but I don't wanna be the asshole dad who never lets their kid watch anything fun.

I still play and keep myself as informed about games as I do now, even after having kids.

I quit games and do other stuff.

In scenario one I decide on a case to case basis on what is suitable and will likely keep getting games for the kid whether he/she asks for it or not. However in scenario 2 I probably wouldn't want to accidentally buy something that could be "bad" by mistake. So during impulse purchases walking with the kid in a store or something, ratings would probably be useful! At home however I would likely just go read up on it first.

Also if the digital age is the future. KEEP AN EYE ON WHAT YOUR KIDS ARE DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOING. It's not going to be as easy to control as retail is.

I wouldn't be fairly lenient about it, but I also wouldn't unleash the Fourth Reich over it either. Everything is dependent on what the game is, how old they are, and if they can understand real violence over hyper stylized fictional violence. Typically when I have my kid, if they're interested in games, then I'll play it first and see if it's right for them. At least I'll be able to make an educated and informed decision unlike most parents of today that let their kid play a violent game, they shoot somebody, and the game is blamed instead of the shitty parenting.

Yes and I would be strict. Currently having a my first born right now I've thought a lot about this. I want my child to appreciate games so as an avid gamer, I'll select games and he can choose what to play from that selection, what I think are appropriate for his age and maturity. I will also not play certain games in front of him (Saints Row, GTA, etc) as to not be a "hypocrite" in his eyes, even though I wouldn't be one but he could think I am.

EDIT: Actually I wouldn't use their content rating but will be the judge if my child is old/mature enough to handle said material