Tor

Tor is an encrypted anonymising network that makes it harder to intercept internet communications, or see where communications are coming from or going to.

In order to use the WikiLeaks public submission system as detailed above you can download the Tor Browser Bundle, which is a Firefox-like browser available for Windows, Mac OS X and GNU/Linux and pre-configured to connect using the anonymising system Tor.

Tails

If you are at high risk and you have the capacity to do so, you can also access the submission system through a secure operating system called Tails. Tails is an operating system launched from a USB stick or a DVD that aim to leaves no traces when the computer is shut down after use and automatically routes your internet traffic through Tor. Tails will require you to have either a USB stick or a DVD at least 4GB big and a laptop or desktop computer.

Tips

Our submission system works hard to preserve your anonymity, but we recommend you also take some of your own precautions. Please review these basic guidelines.

1. Contact us if you have specific problems

If you have a very large submission, or a submission with a complex format, or are a high-risk source, please contact us. In our experience it is always possible to find a custom solution for even the most seemingly difficult situations.

2. What computer to use

If the computer you are uploading from could subsequently be audited in an investigation, consider using a computer that is not easily tied to you. Technical users can also use Tails to help ensure you do not leave any records of your submission on the computer.

3. Do not talk about your submission to others

If you have any issues talk to WikiLeaks. We are the global experts in source protection – it is a complex field. Even those who mean well often do not have the experience or expertise to advise properly. This includes other media organisations.

After

1. Do not talk about your submission to others

If you have any issues talk to WikiLeaks. We are the global experts in source protection – it is a complex field. Even those who mean well often do not have the experience or expertise to advise properly. This includes other media organisations.

2. Act normal

If you are a high-risk source, avoid saying anything or doing anything after submitting which might promote suspicion. In particular, you should try to stick to your normal routine and behaviour.

3. Remove traces of your submission

If you are a high-risk source and the computer you prepared your submission on, or uploaded it from, could subsequently be audited in an investigation, we recommend that you format and dispose of the computer hard drive and any other storage media you used.

In particular, hard drives retain data after formatting which may be visible to a digital forensics team and flash media (USB sticks, memory cards and SSD drives) retain data even after a secure erasure. If you used flash media to store sensitive data, it is important to destroy the media.

If you do this and are a high-risk source you should make sure there are no traces of the clean-up, since such traces themselves may draw suspicion.

4. If you face legal action

If a legal action is brought against you as a result of your submission, there are organisations that may help you. The Courage Foundation is an international organisation dedicated to the protection of journalistic sources. You can find more details at https://www.couragefound.org.

Submit documents to WikiLeaks

WikiLeaks publishes documents of political or historical importance that are censored or otherwise suppressed. We specialise in strategic global publishing and large archives.

The following is the address of our secure site where you can anonymously upload your documents to WikiLeaks editors. You can only access this submissions system through Tor. (See our Tor tab for more information.) We also advise you to read our tips for sources before submitting.

wlupld3ptjvsgwqw.onion

Copy this address into your Tor browser. Advanced users, if they wish, can also add a further layer of encryption to their submission using our public PGP key.

If you cannot use Tor, or your submission is very large, or you have specific requirements, WikiLeaks provides several alternative methods. Contact us to discuss how to proceed.

Classified By: DCM A.F. Godfrey for reasons 1.4(b,d).
-------
SUMMARY
-------
1. (C) Local representatives of the Armenian Revolutionary
Federation (ARF - "Dashnaksutyun") have been downplaying the
results of the June 19 balloting in Nagorno-Karabakh in which
their ARF/Movement 88 alliance (who many predicted would fare
best in the election - reftel) won only three seats in the
local "parliament." While awaiting the final results from
the Central Election Commission, journalists and observers
praised the balloting to the Armenian press as generally fair
and transparent, Stepanakert-based ARF representatives,
however, are reportedly compiling a list of purported
violations and the use of "administrative resources" by
government officials to unfairly skew the election results in
favor of the ruling parties (who captured approximately 64
percent of the votes cast). Despite early threats that they
might decline their three seats in protest, ARF
representatives told us -- through their local counterparts
-- that they would not publicly protest the elections as it
might "unnecessarily threaten N-K security." End Summary.
--------------------------------------------- --------
YEREVAN DASHNAKS DISTANCE THEMSELVES FROM N-K RESULTS
--------------------------------------------- --------
2. (C) Local representatives of the Armenian Revolutionary
Federation (ARF - "Dashnaksutyun") have been downplaying the
results of the June 19 balloting in Nagorno-Karabakh in which
their ARF-Movement 88 alliance won only three seats in the
parliament. A preliminary report published by the Central
Election Commission stated that the ARF/Movement 88 coalition
took 24.4 percent of the proportional vote. Giro Manoyan,
Director of the ARF International Bureau, contradicted
earlier statements and went to great lengths to portray the
Armenia and N-K arms of the organizations as "unrelated" in
terms of levels of popular support. He told us on June 22
that the balloting in Nagorno-Karabakh had "no bearing on the
ARF's political standing in Armenia." ARF leaders made
similar comments during press conferences on June 20 and 21
and steered clear of discussion of the purported electoral
violations that N-K ARF leaders cited earlier over the
weekend.
-----------------------------------------
OBSERVERS GIVE "ELECTION" A PASSING GRADE
-----------------------------------------
3. (C) Local NGOs and Diaspora-based organizations have
reported to us that observers of the June 19 balloting called
it transparent and well organized. Local press cited
comments by the British Helsinki Association, Russian State
Duma and Public International Law and Policy Group that the
balloting was orderly and that access to monitors and press
exceeded their expectations. Some estimates put the voter
turnout as high as 78 percent of eligible N-K voters.
4. (C) Louis Sell (a former U.S. Foreign Service Officer) was
among those who praised the election as "very correct." He
reportedly told some of our contacts in Yerevan that N-K
"President" Ghukassian had used rhetoric in advance of
election day that many considered "playing the national
security card" in favor of the ruling authorities. N-K
"Foreign Minister" Melkonian reportedly learned of this
perception, engaged foreign observers on their concerns and
arranged for a follow-up meeting with Ghukassian during which
he explained his comments to the observers.
--------------------------------------------- --------
CLAIMS OF VIOLATIONS, USE OF ADMINISTRATIVE RESOURCES
--------------------------------------------- --------
5. (SBU) ARF groups in Stepanakert made claims to
Yerevan-based press that "N-K authorities had used
administrative resources to skew the results in their favor."
The ARF's spokesperson told reporters that they were
compiling a list of violations. Immediately following the
CEC's release of the preliminary results, the ARF/Movement 88
said it would not stage public protests regarding the
balloting (saying it would unnecessarily "threaten N-K
security") but might instead decline their three seats in the
"parliament" as a sign of protest. Beyond the initial
announcement, however, there has been little mention of any
such action from either part of the coalition.
---------------------------------------------
COMMENT: EARLY INDICATOR OF DASHNAK DECLINE?
---------------------------------------------
6. (C) While Yerevan Dashnaks take measures to distance
themselves publicly from the ARF's defeat in N-K's
"election," the results came as a surprise to local GOAM
politicos and Embassies -- including us -- who predicted the
Dashnaks would flex their political muscle in N-K as a
precursor to national elections in Armenia in 2007 and 2008.
National Assembly Deputy Speaker Vahan Hovanissian, the most
likely ARF candidate for the next presidential bid in
Armenia, will likely continue to burnish his image in
national politics over the next 12 months and emphasize the
ARF's image as a member of the ruling coalition in Yerevan.
The June 19 balloting in N-K, however, suggests he will now
have to battle the perception that the ARF's reach may be
waning at the ballot box.
EVANS

Raw content

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 YEREVAN 001097
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/CACEN, EUR/SNEC, DRL
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/21/2015
TAGS: PREL, PGOV, AM
SUBJECT: YEREVAN DASHNAKS DOWNPLAY DISAPPOINTMENT IN N-K
BALLOTING
REF: YEREVAN 1054
Classified By: DCM A.F. Godfrey for reasons 1.4(b,d).
-------
SUMMARY
-------
1. (C) Local representatives of the Armenian Revolutionary
Federation (ARF - "Dashnaksutyun") have been downplaying the
results of the June 19 balloting in Nagorno-Karabakh in which
their ARF/Movement 88 alliance (who many predicted would fare
best in the election - reftel) won only three seats in the
local "parliament." While awaiting the final results from
the Central Election Commission, journalists and observers
praised the balloting to the Armenian press as generally fair
and transparent, Stepanakert-based ARF representatives,
however, are reportedly compiling a list of purported
violations and the use of "administrative resources" by
government officials to unfairly skew the election results in
favor of the ruling parties (who captured approximately 64
percent of the votes cast). Despite early threats that they
might decline their three seats in protest, ARF
representatives told us -- through their local counterparts
-- that they would not publicly protest the elections as it
might "unnecessarily threaten N-K security." End Summary.
--------------------------------------------- --------
YEREVAN DASHNAKS DISTANCE THEMSELVES FROM N-K RESULTS
--------------------------------------------- --------
2. (C) Local representatives of the Armenian Revolutionary
Federation (ARF - "Dashnaksutyun") have been downplaying the
results of the June 19 balloting in Nagorno-Karabakh in which
their ARF-Movement 88 alliance won only three seats in the
parliament. A preliminary report published by the Central
Election Commission stated that the ARF/Movement 88 coalition
took 24.4 percent of the proportional vote. Giro Manoyan,
Director of the ARF International Bureau, contradicted
earlier statements and went to great lengths to portray the
Armenia and N-K arms of the organizations as "unrelated" in
terms of levels of popular support. He told us on June 22
that the balloting in Nagorno-Karabakh had "no bearing on the
ARF's political standing in Armenia." ARF leaders made
similar comments during press conferences on June 20 and 21
and steered clear of discussion of the purported electoral
violations that N-K ARF leaders cited earlier over the
weekend.
-----------------------------------------
OBSERVERS GIVE "ELECTION" A PASSING GRADE
-----------------------------------------
3. (C) Local NGOs and Diaspora-based organizations have
reported to us that observers of the June 19 balloting called
it transparent and well organized. Local press cited
comments by the British Helsinki Association, Russian State
Duma and Public International Law and Policy Group that the
balloting was orderly and that access to monitors and press
exceeded their expectations. Some estimates put the voter
turnout as high as 78 percent of eligible N-K voters.
4. (C) Louis Sell (a former U.S. Foreign Service Officer) was
among those who praised the election as "very correct." He
reportedly told some of our contacts in Yerevan that N-K
"President" Ghukassian had used rhetoric in advance of
election day that many considered "playing the national
security card" in favor of the ruling authorities. N-K
"Foreign Minister" Melkonian reportedly learned of this
perception, engaged foreign observers on their concerns and
arranged for a follow-up meeting with Ghukassian during which
he explained his comments to the observers.
--------------------------------------------- --------
CLAIMS OF VIOLATIONS, USE OF ADMINISTRATIVE RESOURCES
--------------------------------------------- --------
5. (SBU) ARF groups in Stepanakert made claims to
Yerevan-based press that "N-K authorities had used
administrative resources to skew the results in their favor."
The ARF's spokesperson told reporters that they were
compiling a list of violations. Immediately following the
CEC's release of the preliminary results, the ARF/Movement 88
said it would not stage public protests regarding the
balloting (saying it would unnecessarily "threaten N-K
security") but might instead decline their three seats in the
"parliament" as a sign of protest. Beyond the initial
announcement, however, there has been little mention of any
such action from either part of the coalition.
---------------------------------------------
COMMENT: EARLY INDICATOR OF DASHNAK DECLINE?
---------------------------------------------
6. (C) While Yerevan Dashnaks take measures to distance
themselves publicly from the ARF's defeat in N-K's
"election," the results came as a surprise to local GOAM
politicos and Embassies -- including us -- who predicted the
Dashnaks would flex their political muscle in N-K as a
precursor to national elections in Armenia in 2007 and 2008.
National Assembly Deputy Speaker Vahan Hovanissian, the most
likely ARF candidate for the next presidential bid in
Armenia, will likely continue to burnish his image in
national politics over the next 12 months and emphasize the
ARF's image as a member of the ruling coalition in Yerevan.
The June 19 balloting in N-K, however, suggests he will now
have to battle the perception that the ARF's reach may be
waning at the ballot box.
EVANS

Metadata

This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

Print

You can use this tool to generate a print-friendly PDF of the document 05YEREVAN1097_a.

Include summaryInclude headersInclude raw metadata

Share

The formal reference of this document is 05YEREVAN1097_a, please use it for anything written about this document. This will permit you and others to search for it.