Yes, there is a link to a Swedish article and picture of her at the F-I board. I can't say whether or not she looks like him. I know the story is old and Glatt's book is supposed to be less than possible, but apparently the article is saying that he would find it easier to recognize her now that his father is gone.

No, he denied it, but he has never submitted to a paternity test because a California court threw out her mom's case for lack of jurisdiction. The only place she could try to have it done is in Monaco and that for certain isn't happening if Albert doesn't want it to.

if he ever were to do that here's my questions:):
are you truely happy with being a ruling prince?
since your country is the 2nd smallest in the world, are you given the same amount of respect as if your country was the largest in the world?
are your sisters truely close to one another?
do you really want to marry?
if so, had your true love came and gone because of the stress of your position?
and are you use to all the coverage you get from the press?
and by the way i need a job(still)and i'm a massage therapist-will you hire me?
thx for your time

In an episode that had royal-watchers recalling the early life of the prince's paternal grandmother, Princess Charlotte of Monaco, in 1992, a California woman, Tamara J. Rotolo, filed a paternity suit against the prince, claiming that he was the father of her illegitimate daughter, whom she named Jazmin Grace Grimaldi. However, the case, which went to trial in 1993, eventually was dismissed by Superior Court Judge Graham Anderson Cribbs, who claimed that there was "insufficient contact between Albert and the state of California to justify hearing a suit there" (Evening Standard, March 24, 1993, page 20), agreeing with an assertion by the prince's lawyer, Stanley Arkin, that the California court had no jurisdiction. In court papers, Prince Albert admitted that he had been with Tamara Rotolo in Monaco on "a couple of occasions" in July1991. (The child had been born approximately nine months later, on March 4, 1992.) As reported by a local newspaper covering the case, "Arkin asserted that the Riverside County court had no jurisdiction in the case since the romantic encounter supposedly occurred in Monaco and Albert has had no contacts with California that relate to the issues in the suit."
An earlier paternity suit, brought by Bea Fielder, a German topless model whom the Daily Telegraph described as a "sex-film star", reportedly also was dismissed. A blood test reportedly proved that the prince was not the father of Fielder's son.

THis is jasmin in 1993. Does anyone think she looks like the Grimaldi side?
I got this pic from Corbis.

Perhaps, she has something...But i can be wrong.
Really, i wouln´t like if she was his douther. For me, if Albert has a child, he have to marry with a woman who loves him and have children with her, not in that way.

I don't see Albert asking for an arranged marriage. It goes against the whole basis for him not getting married. Only time will tell but if I had to guess is that he has been keeping someone on his Christmas list that we don't know about.

I hardly believe it. I don't think Al waited this long to have an arranged marriage.

The article on NY Daily News is very hilarious. There are some discussions on the F-I board that HSH might pull what JFK Jr. did - marrying after his mother passed away. As HSH has said many times, it's not impossible for him to be getting married at 50, so he has, conceivably, 3 more years.

Here's a question. Do you think the woman he marries has to be of child-bearing age/capability or could he marry for love someone who was infertile?

Hmmm....

All these stories popping out: the supposedly illegitimate daughter in California, reps scouring high society ladies on both sides of the Atlantic for an arranged marriage - not because he's really wants to get married but because he just wants to get the having an heir duty out of the way and carry on his dalliances, sibling rivalry. Boy, you can tell we're definitely heading into summer when the publications are running out things to write about.

Can anyone clarify something for me please, if possible? I have read several articles in which it was stated that the royal family "would be in mourning for three months until July 6th"...I'm not clear on that. What does this mean, exactly? That the press should not bother the Grimaldis for three months so they can grieve...or what exactly? Sorry, but I'm not familiar with the customs...