Tags

Lloyd's Op-Eds

Jimmy Carter began the nasty, divisive use of religion in modern American politics

When it comes to divisive and mean-spirited injection of religion into American politics, things have reached a new low — at least from the vantage point of this observer, who has watched every presidential election since the Eisenhower/Stevenson contest in 1952.

The lowest point in this Death Valley was reached last week when Republican candidate Rick Santorum, the darling of evangelicals and social conservatives, told us that John F. Kennedy’s landmark 1960 speech about his commitment to honor the Constitution’s separation of church and state made him “want to throw up.” Of course, Santorum had grossly distorted the meaning of both JFK’s promise and the Constitution by equating them with “say[ing] that people of faith have no role in the public square.” And Santorum’s lies and/or stupidity were merely the lowest and most recent in a race to the bottom among many of the Republican contenders in this election cycle, where daily we bear witness to polls measuring the suspicion of Mormons by Christian evangelicals and whether they would rather re-elect Barack Hussein Obama, whom they suspect is really Muslim, than elevate Mitt Romney, a proud and clearly professed member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.

How did we get to this very bad place in a nation founded by believers (at least most of them) who also believed in strict separation? That belief was evidenced in the “no establishment” first clause of our Constitution’s First Amendment and the “affirmation” alternative to the president’s “oath” of office in Article II, Section 1, Clause 8 — an option selected by Franklin Pierce and Herbert Hoover, our 14th and 31st presidents. Can you imagine the feces storm that would envelop a president selecting that constitutional option today? The horrible plummet to where we are began with Jimmy Carter, in my opinion the most inept and second worst president in the last 80 years, although it took George W. Bush about six years to overcome the ranking compiled by Carter in just four.
Carter’s successful 1976 campaign was filled with his public discussion of how he had been “born again” and his very precise definition of what he meant when describing himself as “evangelical.” Carter explained “…of course evangelical to me is someone who related their experience with Christ and others in hopes that the other person will accept Christ as savior.”

The line could not be straighter from Jimmy Carter in 1976 to Gov. Rick Perry in 2011-12, surrounded at rallies by evangelicals who refer to the Roman Catholic Church as the “Great Harlot,” preach about “the demonic spirit of Islam” and proclaim their fervent desire for a critical mass of Jews to accept Jesus Christ as their savior. Of course, even if they did, they’d still be Jews to Carter who referred to three members of his Cabinet — Harold Brown, James Schlesinger and Michael Blumenthal — as “Jewish” because they had merely converted to Christianity. Blumenthal and his family were Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany, so it was bitterly ironic that Carter adopted the Nazi racial view of Judaism in his categorization of Protestant and Catholic members of his administration as Jews. No escape; once a Jew always a Jew.

Carter continued to endear himself to Jews after leaving office by calling the treatment of Arab-Muslim citizens in Israel “apartheid,” including those who serve in the Knesset, Israel’s national legislature. In Israel, Muslims, and until recently ultra-orthodox Jews, are exempt from otherwise universal and compulsory military service. And while there are very serious ethnic tensions and other problems in Israel, its Muslim citizens are freer there than in any other country in the Middle East and their civil liberties respected as much or more than they are in the United States.

Carter’s most famous religious exhibitionism came late in the 1976 campaign in a Playboy Magazine interview. Citing The Sermon on the Mount, he explained to his interviewer that despite avoiding adultery, he (Carter) was no better than one because many times he had “lusted for a woman outside of marriage.” Too much information Jimmy.

Carter led the way to this very bad place without intending to. Much in the same way that he planned to institute a national health care system and lead the way to energy independence, but failed and inflicted serious damage on both those causes. Similarly, Carter believed in the strict separation of church and state. He laudably resigned from the Southern Baptist Convention in 2000 in protest of the way that organization had attacked Mormons and proselytized them to become “real” Christians. But that was because Carter, unlike many in the Convention, considered Mormons to be Christians. And Jimmy couldn’t see how his own proselytizing “in hopes that the other person will accept Christ as savior” would be a problem for the subjects of his efforts. Jimmy Carter is the personification of the saying that “the road to Hell is paved with good intentions.”

The great and transformative Kennedy speech that nauseated Sen. Santorum was widely credited as both a piece of oratorical genius and a positive turning point in American political life. It was delivered to a group of Southern Baptist ministers in Houston on Sept. 12, 1960. And though not all who attended or listened believed Kennedy when he pledged not to allow the Catholic church to dictate his decisions as president, they (and especially the Baptists) wanted that to be the case. How far and badly we have fallen from that societal consensus. While the worst recent embodiments of that decline have been Rick Perry and Ranger Rick Santorum, it was Jimmy Carter that started it all.

Regular contributor to the Sunday "Perspectives" (Editorial) section of Hearst's Albany Times Union with op-eds on government, law and public policy. Read and comment at timesunion.com and on this website. "The Weekender" social commentary column appears on ccSCOOP.com, Columbia County's Home on the Web, and past columns are archived on this website under the Op-Ed button.

A book about the ground-breaking case that shook the business and legal worlds to their very cores, New York-based law firm Constantine & Partners sought to end a devastating credit monopoly that personally touched millions of consumers. Its efforts culminated in the largest federal antitrust settlement in U.S. history.

Journal of the Plague Year
The March 10, 2008 disclosure that Governor Eliot Spitzer patronized prostitutes shocked admirers around the world who had celebrated him as the "Sheriff of Wall Street" and a likely future president. Ironically, the author's disillusionment with Spitzer had begun to disappear 15 hours earlier, when Spitzer confessed to him what others would soon learn in a media storm of unprecedented intensity. Journal of the Plague Year is Constantine's intimate account of the 17 calamitous months preceding the March 2008 revelation and the futile 61 hour battle waged by the author and the governor's wife to persuade Spitzer not to resign, but to instead fulfill promises made to the voters who had elected him in a record landslide.

Quick Links

Antitrust Today strives to provide a dialogue regarding timely antitrust issues both domestically and abroad. Brought to you by Constantine Cannon LLP, the blog is written by a team of experienced practitioners and strives to address issues relating to competition, regulatory investigations, and more.

The Authors Guild has been the nation's leading advocate for writers' interests in effective copyright protection, fair contracts and free expression since it was founded as the Authors League of America in 1912. It provides legal assistance and a broad range of web services to its members.