The One America News Network and Gravis Marketing poll shows the Democratic presidential front-runner with 48 percent support over 46 percent for the presumptive GOP nominee in a head-to-head general election matchup. Another 5 percent said they would vote for a different candidate.

That falls in line with other polls that show Clinton’s lead slimming as Trump begins mounting his general election campaign against her.

In a Public Policy Polling survey released Tuesday, Clinton had a lead of 4 points over Trump, 42 to 38 percent.

What was the margin of error in this poll? If the difference between the candidates is that number or less - actually, within twice that number because the margin for error is plus or minus - then it is in fact showing a tie.

For a survey of nearly 1600 people, a 2% difference between the two candidates has a 42% chance of being a random result (i.e, consistent with a coin flip). In other words, there's almost a 50% chance this survey is completely meaningless. Is anyone surprised by that? To make a difference of 2% between the candidates a significant result at the 95% level of confidence (i.e., only a 5% chance the poll can be explained by a coin flip), the survey would have to poll approximately 9500 people. A poll of that many people who are actually willing to answer an anonymous phone survey gets mighty expensive...especially for lazy pollsters.

How many people are they contacting who DO NOT pick up the phone, refuse to answer when they find it's a poller calling, or lie like crazy when answering the questions. Me? I'm voting for Sacco, or that Vanzetti guy, no Republicans at ALL. Nosirree Bob!