Do you really think that we need more Dragons? The types is already overpowered. In the last two generations, 2 of the dragons have been granted Uber status (Garchomp and Salamance). Sorry to burst your bubble.

We'll be getting new dragons, but I don't want to see a lot, and not another pseudo-legendary like the already mentioned Garchomp and Salamence. The main problem with the type is that it's overplayed, in Gen III we got a lot of new dragons Vibrava, Flygon, Altaria, the Salamence family, the Lati duo and Rayquaza. That's nine, while in the first two generations we only had 4. Then Gen IV added Garchomp's family, Dialga, Palkia and Giratina, six more. Meaning in the last two generations we got fifteen dragons, that's a lot for a type that supposed to be "rare".

If you mean Garchomp/Salamence/Dragonite-like pseudo-legendaries, I don't want another. I'm sorry, but they make up more than half of the current pseudo-legendaries. That's really too many. I agree with Dragon being a rare type, but all of the non-legendaries are overpowered. If you mean Bidoof-type Dragons, then I also disagree. Dragons are supposed to be rare and powerful; not overpowered and commonplace.
I agree with dragons that are somewhat powerful among the final-stage Pokémon of Isshu. I agree with dragons that supply more type combinations. But another Salamence or Garchomp would be ridiculous.

Sorry to get dirt in your skirts, but Kibagon's final evo is the new pseudo-legendary right?

_________________73% of teenagers would cry if they saw Justin Bieber standing on top of a skyscraper about to jump. If you are the 27% sitting there with popcorn and 3D glasses, screaming "DO A BACKFLIP!", copy and paste this as your signature.

I would be rather unpleasent to see another psuedo-legendary Dragon. They should give another type its chance to shine. I really do not like the ridiculously overpowered dragons mainly for this reason, there is a retardedly large abundance of 11 year old fantards which are like "ZOMG SALAMENCE R Z KOOL3ST!!1!!11!!!!" it gets quite annoying. I try to have a nice, respectable OU match with someone only to be disappointed to see a Salamence. THANKFULLY Salamence has been banished to the Smogon's Ubers Tier, a glorious day. I have quite a bit of hatred toward Garchomp for being Flygon's replacement. I guess Flygon wasn't bad *** enough.

Fantards are going to flock to the next pseudo-legendary Dragon Pokemon like they did to the previous. It may seem hypocritical for me to say since my username is "Blaziken_is_kool" but I can assure you I am not a fantard. I do not like Blaziken because it is OMG KOOL, I like it because I think Torchic is cute and I have nice childhood memories with chickens.

People that actually use a strategy with these uncannily overpowered brutes have my respect, because unlike some others, they don't have 4 ridiculous offensive moves that don't correspond with the rest of their team.

More Dragons types would be welcomed by me with open arms, more overpowerd Dragon-type brutes will be shunned by me.

Sorry for the long rant. Congragulations if you actually read through all that.

_________________Come and see my new and improved trading thread! Now with Black, White, and Dream World!!

Again, I have to stress that most Psuedo legendaries are OU or Uber. The only pourpous a Garchomp has served me was back in Platinum when I put one on my E4 team. I didn't even use it. While I am a fan of dragons, like Kingdra and Dragonite, The new ones are terrible. And the next time I face a Salamance in battle, I will cancel the battle because I don't battle Ubers!

Again I state: I like dragon types and I understand your reasoning, but please remember that the dragons type are NOT invincible, using a strong Ice type against them will and can shut them down. OF course I havent battled anyone via WIFI( DO NOT GET ME STARTED ON WIFI......) so I cant share you pain/anguish yada,yada,yada. The only dragon I REALLY use is raquaza for the following reasons:

-Its LVL 100
-Its the only LVL 100 I have right now that nows fly.

The other dragons i dont really us that much.....

As for new dragon types (again ive already stated this) BRING EM ON. I just hope that thye give dragons to types that dont have any (bug,poison,fighting.......)

_________________A glass is never empty it will always be full of air, unless its in a vacuum, THEN its empty.

I agree, more dragon types that aren't pseudo-legendaries. its annoying. Like Flygon and Altaria. Altaria and swablu were pretty rare, and Flygon was interesting, especially its evolution chain. We need more kind of rare (like those ones you can find in a few areas, but are like 5% chance of seeing) around in Isshu. It is a new region. I hope it does.

_________________

Hi my name is HunterAvatar credited to me. I can make you one too if you want. ;D

I agree with M_B. The new Pseudo-Legendary should be a Steel/Ice type. Something like that could own Salamence and Garchomp so easialy with STAB Ice Shard, that they would drop back down to OU!

_________________These past years have been great, and this community was a great one. Key word being was. Since my birthday last year, the site hasn't updated at all, and people have been slowly trickling away from the forums over the weeks. I've had this site as my internet homepage for ages, and I anxiously awaited the resurgence that I hoped would come. But it never came. So, it is with a heavy heart that I announce my permanent leave of Psypoke. As a moderator, I wished only the best for everyone here, and worked to maintain a jolly environment where everyone could discuss cartoon monsters in peace. Now, I wish all those who happen to be reading this message good luck in whatever endeavors you have chosen to pursue, and that your futures be bright.

It seems a lot of people agree less overpowered Dragon Pokemon would be nice. I shouldn't say I only dislike overpowered Dragons, I dislike most ridiculously Pokemon. Overpowered Pokemon remind me of big school-yard bullies, or greedy CEOs.

_________________Come and see my new and improved trading thread! Now with Black, White, and Dream World!!

I like dragon pokemon and don't think that people should "shun" them or "scoff" at their creation because they are too powerful. Instead of getting worked up over a loss because someone used a dragon and you didn't, grow some balls and fight fire with fire.

That said, Nintendo should be more worried about the horribly unbalanced battle types than the base statistics of the pokemon.. Seriously... There is no need for Fire, Water, Grass AND electric to all be weak against dragon. (Steel also needs to be looked at, fyi.)

_________________I am A...I am also a pathological liar. Do you believe me?

I like dragon pokemon and don't think that people should "shun" them or "scoff" at their creation because they are too powerful. Instead of getting worked up over a loss because someone used a dragon and you didn't, grow some balls and fight fire with fire.

most of them are banned in competitive battling because they're too powerful, and since this site caters to a lot of competitive battlers, that's the kind of response you'll see. i like dragon pokemon as well, but i still think they're overdone as pseudo-legendaries; and nobody is "shunning" or "scoffing" at their creation. all i see are some valid points as to why dragons shouldn't be pseudo-legends for the next couple of gens. there's little need to attack everyone for putting forth their opinion. and the types thing... well, what can you do.

I loved how there were so little dragon types but then there was Hoenn. Hoenn was overflowed with dragons and so was Sinnoh. Now the Isshu region will probably have a bzillion dragon type legendaries. It already has two legendaries and one pseudo confirmed. Do the creators want to make all legendary pokemon dragon? There was not one legendary dragon before Hoenn. As an original Pokemon fan, I am disapointed.

_________________It would of been nice if new Pokemon were stopped being created after Generation III.

Rex, people have no reason to complain if the dragons are banned in competitive battling, which you insist many here are involved in. Where the dragons are allowed, I was simply saying people might as well take advantage of their power rather than avoiding them and using such as an excuse for losing.

_________________I am A...I am also a pathological liar. Do you believe me?

Calm down a little, please. And nobody here's about losing to them, either. i think most people don't want to use them simply because of all the little 10-year olds that run around with *coughsixshinysalamencescough* a crapload of dragon-types, and have to put up with it. i agree with you in that people shouldn't use them as an excuse for having lost a match; but there's a logic behind every reason.

P.S. I know that many people here battle in a competitive style. Or at minimum, are very serious about it. Not insist.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum