Village School

Sunday, 28 August 2011

It is hard to believe but the first personalized learning environment that many of our older generation experienced came courtesy of a tobacco tin. Most children, back then there were no students, carried a tobacco tin filled with their sight words. These were written by the teacher for each child. They included the twenty basic sight words, the child’s name, their family, friends and favourite things. Children practiced these words, created sentences and copied them into their exercise books.

An early educator in New Zealand, Sylvia Ashton-Warner championed the rights of the child to have an education that was personalised for them as the learner. While teaching in Taranaki she recognized that Maori children failed to progress through the reading levels until she developed readers that related to their every day experiences. She believed that a child’s native imagery was the key to creating a powerful learning environment for that child. Without an understanding of the undermind of the child then education failed to meet the needs of the many, especially those who were not white, middle class, New Zealanders' of English descent.

Sylvia Ashton-Warner's story of the banana in the satchel is particularly relevant when considering personalising a students learning environment. When about to add a book to a satchel a student notices a banana lying at the bottom. The student can either remove the banana or stomp it down so that the book can be added. Too often, she lamented, education stomped on student’s prior knowledge until it was reduced to mush, then added what was considered important. Students’ experiences were considered irrelevant or a hindrance to the learning process.

The art of identifying and using students experiences can have powerful results. Dame Marie Clay’s work in the 1980’s focused on working with students strengths before adding new learning. The first task of reading recovery was to identify what a student knew. Armed with this knowledge the teacher spent the next three weeks consolidating the student’s prior knowledge and working only with what the student already knew. After this period students moved into developing new skills. With three weeks focused on what they could do as a reader the student’s approach was more likely to bring about success. Students often achieved in twelve weeks what had eluded them in twelve months, the ability to read at their chronological age.

When considering personalisation in this day and age educators must ensure that the starting point is not the capabilities of the technology but the experiences and the needs of the student.

Thursday, 21 July 2011

If we keep doing what we have always done then it is obvious that we will get what we always got.

When I was a child we had a go-cart. It went rather too slow for our liking so we set about modifying it. First we worked to reduce weight and drag. The improvement was not to our liking. We shifted the focus from throwing things away to adding things on. We added a four stroke motor. We all hated mowing the lawns anyway. The result initially involved a hedge but with a few driver improvements was very much to our liking.

The third options for changing our behaviour in regard to making time is a shift in energy from reducing to a focus on building.

When seeking help for workload and time issues there are more books available than there is time to read them, let alone effectively implement the fabulous ideas they contain. These solutions often look at tasks and focus on; managing, organising, prioritising and eliminating distractions.
Another path to take is to increase capacity by focusing on that which is closest to the heart. Not the mechanics of how to do the job better but why do the job. Ask the big "why" question about your occupation and then go further. The real answer to creating capacity is in the many small tasks that eat up the twenty four hours in each day. Filtering the little tasks through the big “why”, critiquing them before acting or for that matter choosing not acting. Steve Jobs once said, “I am as proud of what we don’t do as I am of what we do.”
Although time is constant, knowledge is not. Until seventy years ago it was believed that there was only one galaxy. Plate tectonics became fact in 1968 when the observations that was published four hundred and fifty years earlier was proven scientifically. Knowledge is fluid and subject to change. In the guide Enquiring Minds produced by Microsoft and Future Labs the authors listed three types of knowledge; functional, cultural and critical.1 Critical knowledge is understanding and critiquing the forces that shape us and our world. Defining the “why” requires exploring this type of knowledge. In developing critical knowledge, common practices and widely held assumptions need to be challenged. There is a requirement to research, to read, to watch, to ask, to discuss and to stay informed. Building critical knowledge allows a deeper understanding of the “why” that underpins each day. It builds cognitive capacity which impacts positively on how time is used.

Although it defies logic, to make time, we need to change our behaviour and spend more time researching and understanding “the why” in what drives us.

Monday, 6 June 2011

Time is constant but a change in behaviour can effect what can be done in a given time period. This is the second blog in a series of three and explores the advantages of multi-tasking.

In 1992 I read a great little piece about time. The article has long gone from my life but the words “I’m tired of feeling tired of feeling tired in this non stop world of ours…” often bounces around in my head space particularly when I consider what I know and what I think I should know.

The non-stop world of 1992 was a data trickle compared to the digital avalanche of information that hits the web each day today. If you think you can keep pace then read the following Washington Post article or watch the USC clip and accept that in 2011 no one knows everything that needs to be known about any given topic. Information anxiety is an ever present companion for learners of today.

In Susan Scotts book “Fierce Conversations” she talks about the loss of possibilities when a conversation stops or is muted. Multi-tasking is one such conversation which stops before dialogue begins. Amongst many in the teaching fraternity multi-tasking explains the demise of concentration and why the mental health of many are at risk as people lose the ability to tool down and contemplate. On the flip side the supporters can not imagine why anyone would choose to uni-task when multi-tasking provides so many opportunities.

Life long learners need to give attention to both concentration and contemplation to succeed throughout life. Knowing how to multi-task and when to take a break are important skills that need to be taught in our connected, digital world. Work published by the following authors; Norman Doidge, Small and Vorgan, and John Medina provides access to research on how the brain functions when faced with multiple tasking.

Four points filter to the top in regard to multi-tasking.

1. The brain processes different tasks in different regions. So two or more tasks can be processed at the same time as long as they use different regions of the brain. Students need to be able to identify the primary task and ensure that it is not competing with any other tasks in regard to brain function. This avoids the loss of performance caused by dual task interference.

2. The aptitude for multi-tasking is not fully developed in children and is one of the first aptitudes to decline in the aged. However, children who multi-task are aware of when they are not learning and they need the opportunity to change their learning conditions when necessary. They are capable of self-regulating.

3. Multi-tasking needs more time than uni-tasking. Focusing on one task reduces the time required to complete that task if the appeal, attractiveness and fun elements keep the student engaged. Often these elements are difficult to inject into the learning. Joining the primary task with low cost activities that improve motivation, completion rates and do not reduce overall performance reinvigorates the learner.

4. Students need to learn to identify the most effective time to switch or to interrupt a task. There are natural points for task switching or interrupting someone during a task that allow students to return to the task with the minimum of loss. Just randomly pulling the plug on a device is unwise, so to with learning.

With informed use multi-tasking can allow us to achieve more in a given time period. Multi-tasking should not be the only mode for living but when used as part of a balanced life it can enrich the time available.

Notes:

Richard Saul Wurman (2002) information anxiety: "the gap between what you know and what you think you should know"

"If the conversation stops, is muted, becomes less authentic or if we add another topic to the things we are unable to talk about... Then all of the possibilities for the relationship become smaller and all of the possibilities for the people in the relationship become smaller until one day I overhear myself in mid-sentence making myself smaller in every encounter, behaving as if I am just the space around my shoes."

Sunday, 15 May 2011

One of the mantras that can be used to reflect on teaching practice is, “What story am I telling and what do I get out of it”.

One of the stories often told is that there is not enough time to do what needs to be done.

For those that exercise on an excercycle the indisputable fact is that five minutes is always three hundred seconds no matter how fast you go or how fit you are. There is nothing to be gained by fighting the inevitable, time is constant. The only thing we can change is our behaviour in any given time period.

This and the next two blogs explore three stories on changing our behaviour to make time.

In teaching much time can be saved by choosing the right time. In the days of old one was reminded that a stitch in time saved nine and one was encouraged to strike while the iron was hot. A version of Victor Hugo's quote says it best though, "There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come."

Over the last few years there has been a challenge issued to classroom teachers to move from the idea of the "just in case approach" to the "just in time approach” to the delivery of content, skills and process. In 2006 a keynote at a New Zealand conference shared this concept and created a ripple effect in classrooms around the country. I was faced with the challenge to embrace "just in time" to better meet my students needs or defend my practice in light of this approach. I researched all I could on the Internet, talked with colleagues and grappled with developing a workable model that improved student learning within my classes. My trials left both myself and my students dissatisfied. My experimentation had robbed students of valuable learning time that I could not replace.

Five years on and the landscape has changed drastically. A growing number of students and staff have inexpensive mobile devices. Many schools and homes are wireless and mobile networks deliver internet to the places in between. It is time to tell a different story. The computer in your pocket, the iPod/iPhone/android/cellphone or the iPad, the netbook or the laptop give people access to a world of information.

Already teachers use YouTube for delivery of content and skills using a variety of entertaining and informative video clips. The access to information through online encyclopaedias, Google and sites like Wolfram grows daily. Social networking sites are creating opportunities for learning conversations between people separated by time and place. The creation and sharing of content has never been easier.

Today people are living just in time lives in their homes. Watching MySky or TV on-demand, finding tonight’s dinner recipe on the net and watching YouTube for instructions to change the brake pads on the car. GPS is the new map book of choice. Today’s first call when sick is not Mum. The internet is the new medical expert giving that first diagnosis or the reassurance that the doctor might just be right.

Students can rightly ask, “Can school give me anything that I can’t get on the internet quicker.” Teachers need to design learning within a digital environment and students need access to content and skills that are relevant to their learning when they need them. Teachers play a pivotal role in guiding students along their learning journey. Using their skills and knowledge as educators, teachers make the learning easier for the students and give the learning context. Just in case can no longer keep up with identifying and delivering what students need to know from all the information available today.

The answer to making time is constructing the learning in the digital world. The time for “just in time” has arrived.

The last word must go to my iPhone. Recently while I enjoyed a coffee at the Kakaramea Hotel, I checked my iphone for the time. From the screen of the iPhone the following wisdom was shared, “There is no time available when there is no cellular connection”.

Wednesday, 20 April 2011

During lunchtime the social challenged child sits beside the popular kid in the school computer space. They chat about how to modify the cheat codes in marble blast. The positive online interaction spills over into real life, creating a positive connection between individuals that would otherwise have at best avoided eachother. One of the four vision statements is "connected". What authentic opportunities do you provide for today's digital students to connect authentically with eachother within their learning environment.

Tuesday, 19 April 2011

In the early 1990's parents were parents and teachers were teachers. Few institution other than Parent Centre paid much heed to parents as teachers or developing a home school partnership in learning. The concept of life long learners was more of a threat to the masses in a time of growing redundancies and unemployment.

At this time New Zealand schools began sending students home from primary schools with portfolios. These large scrapbooks contained annotated examples of their work that documented their learning during the year. They came home with the mid and end of year reports and provided teachers and parents with real examples to discuss when they met for the parent interviews.

The portfolio was designed for a particular purpose at a time when multimedia was technical and the internet ran at 14k on dial-up.

Jumping forward to 2011, there have been incremental changes to the portfolio. The greatest of these for some schools has been the digitising of the content. The challenge has been to bring the students learning together in one place on the internet and to have it accessible all year round and beyond.

Travelling along the developmental timeline with the eportfolio has been the online learning environment. Often these two concepts blur into a single task that has many teachers suffering from techno brain burnout even before anyone mentions social media and digital citizenship.

The eportfolio lies just beyond the grasp of many classroom teachers. A promised land perceived to be inhabited by the truly dedicated and skilled teachers of the future. The failure to produce an eportfolio that works for all students and teachers lies not in the dedication of teachers, the design of the software or the implementation but in the basic concept. The portfolio has been part of the learning landscape for less than twenty years. It is time to create a model that meets today's needs. A model that takes advantage of today's technology but is not driven by a need to be an expert in that technology. It needs to be as simple as the introduction of the ball point pen was to the school room. It has to be easy to implement and the advantages must be immediately obvious.

A web portal to student learning is one solution I am exploring this term. It can be best described as a starting point people can pass through to travel into the student's personal learning world. This model creates one place for students, teachers and family to go to in order to enter the student's learning space anytime, anywhere. Today's tools easily allow areas to be open to the public or closed to all but a selected few. Templates can be developed to allow schools to define minimum content but not limit the enthusiasm and creativity of individual teachers and students.

The best place for a teacher to start is with their own web portal. The Virtual Learning Network offers a place to start. Why not sign up and create your own space now.

Remember the golden rule as stated by Confucius:

Never impose on others what you would not choose for yourself.

Create your own web portal before you ask your students to do the same.

Sunday, 17 April 2011

The context in which we experience an event, regardless of whether we are passive views or active participants shapes our connection to that event and those in it. As teachers of the iGen student the challenge is to create a context that takes students beyond the zombie zone where they are desensitised by digital media.

Alonso Álvarez Barreda uses the sign to create different connections to the man and his limitations. "Have compassion, I am blind" gives the viewer permission to distance themselves from the man. To be desensitised. Consider that the word compassion comes from an old french word meaning "suffer with". It is difficult as an adult to develop a real connection with someone whose suffering is outside our experience. Brain research shows that the tween-agers and teenagers of today are still developing the ability to understand or share the feelings of another. It is even more challenging for students to relate to the man and his limitations than adults who should by adulthood have developed their prefrontal cortex for processing decisions that affect others.

The second sign, "It's a beautiful day and I can't see it" moves the focus from the man's disability to the viewer's ability. To be able to understand and share the feelings of someone who can not enjoy the beauty of the day depicted in the film is within the experience of all those who are viewing the film. The beginning of the short film, showing the rich tapestry of life in which the man sits creates the context where the viewer connects with the reality of the man's suffering. The viewer is able to suffer with him when they consider what they can see but the man is unable to experience. The context created by the second sign provides the connection that moves the viewer from the zombie zone to empathy.

The vision statement in the New Zealand Curriculum states that young people need to be connected. They need to be able to relate well to others, to have empathy. Digital media is a powerful medium to build connections, to create empathy. The challenge is to carefully craft the context in which digital media is used and not de-sensitise students by bombarding them with digital content.

To view the tsunami in Japan from a context that creates empathy to go the following youtube clip. The clip is shot from a school.

Note: If you are over 18 (iGran) you probably read the blog to decide whether you would watch the clip. If you are under 18 (iGen) you probably watched the clip to decide whether you would read the blog.