Despite your leadership of the “profit engine” of News Corporation owned by (alleged hacker backer?) Rupert Murdoch and a recipient of $23,000,000 in salary and bonuses last year, you have failed the American public by refusing to report (or allow reporting) the questions regarding the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief of the United States.

One of your recommendations for success is for your staff to “read the U.S. Constitution.” When is the last time you read Article II, Section 1, clause 5, which states:

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

With your extensive and impressive history in media production, politics, consulting and business, you have steadfastly refused to allow your staff to report on the most pressing matter possibly in the history of the country: whether or not the person currently occupying the White House has a constitutional right to do so according to Article II.

Another of your slogans is reportedly “See things other don’t. Do things others won’t.”

Then why won’t you? Why haven’t you?
During the 2008 presidential campaign, your reporters asked Obama no tough questions. You must have heard that even (Democrat) Chris Mathews of MSNBC stated in 2007 that Obama was born in Indonesia, as did a reporter for a Hawaii newspaper. Did that not make you curious?Apparently not. The fine investigative journalism which millions of Americans had come to expect from Fox News Channel was glaringly absent. The tough, tenacious questioning of E.D. Hill disappeared, only to be replaced by other blondes with shorter skirts and increasingly lower necklines but no ability to investigate anything.

You allowed a man who has hidden his past completely from the American public to gain a place on the ballot in every state and to actually be elected president without one scrap of evidence that he was constitutionally eligible.

None of your reporters ever performed any in-depth questioning of Obama during the campaign nor gained access to his background. Just when did he go to Indonesia, and what proof did you obtain that he was born in Hawaii?

How many people did you interview who knew him as a child, either in Hawaii or Indonesia?

Why did you not subpoena (FOIA?) his Illinois state senate and U.S. Senate records so that they could be open for inspection by the American people?

And your pompous, overrated evening host, Bill O’Reilly, whose slogan is “We’re looking out for you,” lied when he stated on-air that he had “seen” Obama’s original birth certificate.

He never saw any such thing, because no one has, at least not anything issued in this country.

O’Reilly has seen only what the rest of us have seen: an online image which has been widely debunked as a forgery due to its four different versions, alterations (affirmed by the state of Hawaii as invalidating the certificate), and contradictory statementsmade by two different Hawaii governorsunreported by a complicit media, which includes you.

If O’Reilly had seen Obama’s birth certificate, then Donald Trump wouldn’t be calling for it now.

Of all the cable channels, Fox News Channel has refrained the longest to report anything about the question of whether or not Barack Hussein Obama has a U.S. birth certificate.

Only recently have you been forced to allow the airing of this urgent matter because Donald Trump has raised it as an important constitutional issue.

Until now, your anchors nervously laughed off the question posed by Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, a decorated 18-year Army veteran and former flight surgeon, misrepresenting the matter by calling it “a political statement.”

Again, another blonde anchor who, instead of investigating before Lakin’s court-martial was posing, failed to report when Lakin was sentenced to six months at Ft. Leavenworth, having been denied discovery by a complicit, treasonous military as if he were living in the former Soviet Union.

Your reporters remained complicit about this travesty of justice and over more than two years as multiple lawsuits have been filed against Obama and even Congress, as the military ran scared, and now that a citizen is facing criminal charges for publicly exposing Obama’s lack of proof that he is constitutionally eligible to serve.

And what about that alleged Kenyan birth certificate, Mr. Ailes? Did you know that Mr. Smith has publicly stated that he will testify in front of Congress about its authenticity? What if he is telling the truth?

Recently your popular showman, Sean Hannity, has been labeled a traitor by a veteran of the U.S. military.

The fact that Donald Trump has recently released both his short-form and long-form birth certificates proves that O’Reilly was misinforming the public when he stated that he had seen Obama’s.

Why would Trump and millions of Americans still be demanding it if O’Reilly, your all-powerful arrogant media mogul, had seen it and shown it on national TV?

Besides, read the Constitution, Mr. Ailes! Being a “citizen” is not enough to be President!

Several months ago, Fr. Jonathan Morris made the statement on Fox & Friends Weekend that Obama was “born in a Muslim country, Kenya,” after which the three anchors nervously and vehemently denied it.

Rather than asking how Fr. Morris obtain his information, they tried to quell any curiosity about it and correct the record as quickly as they could to state that Obama was born “in this country.”

How do they know? Have they seen the birth certificate and not said anything?
In early 2009, I personally mailed to you presentments from the American Grand Jury charging Obama and others with treason and fraud. You did nothing.

Obama has unconstitutionally taken over the health, banking and automobile industries, and your anchors continue to soft-pedal and smile as they silkily mention “President Obama.” If the man is ineligible to hold the office, is a usurper who has committed massive election and possibly identity fraud against the American people, why are you even referring to him as the “president?”

Because you received the AGJ presentments, you also received a copy of the criminal complaint for treason filed more than two years ago by LCDR Walter Fitzpatrick, a retired Naval commander with 25 years of service. More than 3,100 other citizens have done the same, and the FBI refuses to respond. What do you think that means, Mr. Ailes?

A retired military member accusing a seated “president” of treason should have been arrested, but he has not been. Neither the FBI nor the Secret Service has taken any action; instead, the complaint remains open and unanswered. Why do you think that is, Mr. Ailes?

Now that your obscenely-paid anchors such as Steve Doocy, Brian Kilmeade, Gretchen Carlson, Greta Van Susteren and Geraldo Rivera have had to choke out a few questions about Obama’s birth certificate and therefore his presidential eligibility with Donald Trump, you might as well have them begin reporting the following:

There are multiple ways to obtain a birth document in Hawaii, one of which includes merely a statement from one relative who has resided in Hawaii for a minimum of one year claiming that a birth took place.

Particularly in Obama’s time, no corroborating information was required. Perhaps this is why Obama does not seem to have an original birth certificate from the state of Hawaii and the reason why the state of Hawaii has obfuscated and refused to answer questions for almost three years.

Neil Abercrombie, the new (Democrat) governor, has even gone so far as to say that no original birth certificate exists for Obama, agreeing with former Hawaii elections clerk Tim Adams.

There is more than ample circumstantial evidence that Obama’s birthplace is Kenya, not Hawaii. Kenyan officials such as th[e ambassador to the United States and members of Parliament have stated such on the record. Why would you not report such information to the public? Is that not the purpose of Fox News Channel, or is your real purpose to push an agenda?

While on Monday evening, Greta Van Susteren played dumb when Donald Trump stated that Obama has spent millions of dollars to hide his original birth certificate, if he even has one, and lamely stated that she “hadn’t seen her birth certificate lately,”

Trump truthfully affirmed that Obama has concealed his past, official public service records, and that people “on the internet” are asking legitimate questions.

A follow-up report on his telephone interview with Van Susteren inaccurately stated that Trump “doesn’t want to become a ‘birther.’” He never said any such thing; rather, he said that the term “birther” is a pejorative to marginalize those who are asking justified questions about where Obama was born, whether or not he is eligible to serve, and what he is hiding about his past.

So despite having to now cover the issue, your reporters are still trying to deny that there is a serious question about Obama’s truthfulness, birthplace, qualifications and therefore a constitutional crisis in which every law and treaty he has signed, every appointment made, and every executive order issues, might be subject to invalidation.

Your staff has known about this potential problem for over two years but pretended that it didn’t exist, much to the detriment of your company. Years ago, I and millions of others relied on Fox News for accurate and timely information, but you have lost any credibility you once had.

I am in possession of documentation from the state of Hawaii which shows that the Hawaii Democrat Party changed the required wording on its nomination certificate for Obama and Biden in 2008. I had to prepare to file a lawsuit to obtain this information.

There is also evidence that it sought cover from the Democrat National Committee to certify that Obama and Biden were constitutionally qualified. Therefore, officials in Hawaii would not have been the ones to certify his eligibility if what we are now discovering was uncovered.

Why has your huge news organization not obtained and reported on such documentation which clearly reveals election fraud?

Moreover, why aren’t you reporting that Obama could never have been eligible because he inherited British citizenship from his father?

Even Obama himself admitted it. Why have you let all of this slip by without one report on it?

(Alan note: Why has your British owner not gone into British Kenyan/Protectorate Archive documents at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and examinied and published the birth ledgers? This is obtainable UNclassified information you refuse to obtain and share).

Instead, your anchors make fools of themselves by reporting that the “first celebrity” was “bounced from ‘Dancing with the Stars’” as our country sinks deeper and deeper into a Marxist coup and unparalleled economic crisis under a constitutionally-ineligible de facto chief executive.

And you continue to pay them their outrageous salaries for sitting there and looking good rather than reporting what is really happening.

And how about the accusations and evidence that Obama committed social security fraud? When will you be reporting that to the American people?

Notice how the report states that Col. Hollister could be brought up on charges when Obama is suspected of criminal wrongdoing!

Mr. Ailes, the charade is over. There is no “President Obama.”

There is a man who is foreign-born with a foreign father who no more qualifies as a “natural born Citizen” than the Pope. I

nstead of trying to cover up the truth, why don’t you return to your original mission which included the late Tony Snow and other reputable journalists who sought the truth, regardless of where it led?

Had you done your job in 2007 and 2008, our nation would not be close to destruction due to the election of an ineligible person to the presidency.

Instead, you aided and abetted the usurpation and have masked the many crimes of which there is ample evidence he has committed.

Even if only one or two of these chrges prove to be true, Obama’s crimes against America far outweigh those of President Richard Nixon.

Could there be any more pressing issue than whether or not the man making decisions to send our servicemen and women into war, sign legislation passed by Congress, appoint Supreme Court justices, signing treaties with foreign governments and invading sovereign countries is legitimate?

About Me

For many years involved with intelligence and security matters in Iran with significant access at top levels during the rule of the Shah, until early 1979. Currently an Iran SME (subject matter expert), analyst/commentator, and multi-linguist.