The submitted logo doesn’t meet the quality guidelines that are require for approval on GraphicRiver. Overall, the design doesn’t carry a strong concept and the final execution isn’t a good fit for the category. Browse through the logo templates gallery to get a better understanding of the required quality. Because this file is being rejected based on quality, we kindly ask that you do not upload this design again. However we do encourage you to submit new designs.

I am curious about your opinions on this file, as well as maybe a more in-depth explanation of the rejection. The reviewer was too ambiguous in my opinion (as many other reviewers on GraphicRiver) and, although I understand that it would be a waste of time to stop and provide precise feedback on all rejected items, I also believe that this level of ambiguity reflects a personal opinion rather than an objective one.

Well the main problem is that is boring(no offense) ,it is to simple there allready are logos like that ,they have a page where they say what they have too much of and what they want to have more,add more shine to it maybeah some reflections, make it more complex looking. Hope that helps.

None taken. It seems like some people have problems interpreting negative space designs. The logo was made so simple because you are supposed to see the actual object that is subtly represented (a wheel slightly in perspective). I guess the reviewers prefer things that are straight-forward and don’t require any imagination on the viewer’s side.

Post Reply

<strong></strong> to make things bold
<em></em> to emphasize
<ul><li> or <ol><li> to make lists
<h3> or <h4> to make headings
<pre></pre> for code blocks
<code></code> for a few words of code
<a></a> for links
<img> to paste in an image (it'll need to be hosted somewhere else though)
<blockquote></blockquote> to quote somebody