Link to post

Share on other sites

Which of the following remediation technologies is most effective for removing high concentrations of low-solubiility petroleum compounds from containment soil?

A. pump & treat wells

B. soil wash with a weak sulfuric acid/water mixture

C. injection of bacteria cultures

D. SVE

I looked in La Grega w/o finding anything I knew how to answer the question with. If you know where the answer is in that book or how to decipher the answer from that book, that would be awesome. I've got the book for the exam from our office library.

507

What is the generally accepted method for measuring attainment with NAAQS for NOx?

A. Nondispersive infrared spectroscopy

B. Calorimetric using Saltzman method

C. Pararosaniline method

D. chemiluminescence method

Never heard of ANY of those things before this questions. What the heck?!

thank you!

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Thanks for posting the question...bioremediation will not be very effective in this case because high concentrations of hydrocarbons in the subsurface indicate the presence of the a significant non-aqueous phase. Bacteria are only able to degrade components that are dissolved from the non-aqueous phase, not the non-aqueous phase itself. Similarly, very high concentrations of hydrocarbons can be toxic to the bugs as well...This would be a case for a treatment train approach, i.e. removal of a significant portion of the hydrocarbon non-aqueous source through SVE, skimmers (for the saturated zone), etc....followed by bioremediation or downstream treatment of the dissolved phase with bioremediation.

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Google "National Ambient Air Quality Standards" (NAAQS) and find the sampling methods manual. You should be able to find the preferred sampling method (including the length of the sample time) for ANY of the criteria pollutants in this manual. It will be a quick table look-up for the correct answer!

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Which of the following geophysical measuring techniques would be used to assess the downhole vertical continuity of a clay stratum?

Terrain Conductivity

Resistivity

Gamma Ray Logging

Ground Penetrating Radar

What is a good reference for this, can anyone explain?

Thanks for all your responses so far. I took today off to finish the PM portion of the 2011 exam, so I'm sure the questions will keep rolling. Air & groundwater are my weakest subject areas.

Since the question asks for downhole techniques for vertical continuity, I think the answer should be gamma ray logging...the other techniques are surface geophysical survey methods and would be good for determining the lateral continuity of a clay unit...

Gamma ray logging is useful for determining clay intervals because the log shows a measurement of natural gamma radiation in the materials surrounding the borehole, since clays naturally have high levels of gamma emitters like potassium, the gamma ray response increases when these materials are encountered in a borehole.

There is a such a thing as downhole resistivity logging (more commonly used in the oil biz as oil is a highly resistive fluid), but I'm thinking that they mean a surface resistivity survey or they would have specified resistivity logs. Maybe a good case to flag the question...

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Butyraldehyde (BA) is produced at a rate of 5000 gpd and fed to a 30,000 gallon tank held at 30C and 771 mmHg absolute pressure under nitrogen. The vent is cooled to -18C in a refrigerated condenser. MW of BA 72.11 Vapor Pressure at 30 C: 150 mmHg, Vapor Pressure at -18C: 10 mmHg.

Find the amount of BA condensed (lb/day).

I'm having trouble conceptualizing, the problems and outlining steps, even after looking at the solution.

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

As I see it, BA has to be stored under nitrogen to prevent a reaction so you are dealing with two gases held under temperature and pressure and you want to condense out the BA at from 30C to -18C.

In the solution, you convert gallons to cubic feet, then to moles total gas at STP., Then convert that volume to 30C and771mm hg to get total moles of N2 and BA held in the tank. From that get the mole fraction BA at 30C based on partial pressure. Subtract that fraction from total volume at 30C to get moles N2. Using partial pressures, get the mole fraction at -18C..

This is where I loose it a little because Im not sure if this is a standard condensation equation or why it is solved this way because I am unfamiliar but the solution multiplies the moles N2 by moles BA at -18 then divides by 1- moles BA at -18C giving you the moles BA at the outlet. If I see a problem like this on the exam I will simply try to set the equation up similar to this.

Subtracting the moles BA at 30C in the tank from moles BA at the -18C outlet gives you moles condensed then convert to lbs.

I dont know if that helped but maybe talking it through will spark an idea.

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

There's another air question on this test about NESHAPs for asbestos demo, and it references 40 CRF 61. How would you guys answer that? I've seen other advice on this site that says don't bring the entire CFR, but how else would we get such a random question? I can post the question in its entirety tomorrow.

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Even if you brought the entire CFR you would spend a lot of time flipping pages and reading unless you knew exactly where the citation was. I happened to know this one because of my experience with asbestos removal. I think we just need to come to terms with the fact that there will be a couple questions on the exam that unless you worked in the field or happen to have the exact reference, you will just have to guess.

I think the secret will to be solid with the quantitative questions which should carry you through most if not all the way to passing and hope you get some non-quantitative questions that you recognize.

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

As far as the CFRs go...I just printed the ones related to the sample questions that I saw. I figured that if it was important enough to be covered by the sample test, a related question might come up on the real test...