Bhupen Khakhar

About Artist

Khakhar's work had been characterized by a rare irreverence and a lack of inhibition about his lack of formal training. Indeed, he had been able to evolve his own mode of address that harnesses this lack of training t...

Khakhar's work had been characterized by a rare irreverence and a lack of inhibition about his lack of formal training. Indeed, he had been able to evolve his own mode of address that harnesses this lack of training to provide an edge to his expressions. His early work made use of ready-made images of deities from popular oleographs which were collaged and painted over, sometimes with graffiti.

Khakhar's interest in 'degenerate' forms of art led him to an exploration of artistic conventions in hybrid traditions that operate in the interregnum between classical miniatures and European illusionism. A deliberate naiveld is visible in his paintings from the 1970s, coupled with a deeply felt sympathy with his subjects, who are often ordinary folk caught in an existence they do not quite understand. There is also biting comment on the gentle stupidity of petit bourgeois life: a quality of being frozen in time perineates several of these representations of common people in all their vulnerability. The vulnerability argument is taken a step further in the early 1980s, when Khakhar's homoerotic concerns come to be openly declared, often with self-referential figures.

The 1980s also bring a move away from the blown-up-picture- postcard painting to spatial arrangements of greater complexity and articulation. Observation of the everyday plays an important role in Khakhar's work, and he is able to zero in on 'typical' characters that the observer can often locate within his/her own experience. He seems to have taken on a project of devising a way of representing the marginal seeking to show that which is always there, but never gets looked at. Khakhar has devised a way of rendering the body with an unusual plainness, like a bone-less structure, that highlights the twin arguments of vulnerability and invisibility that he maintains. His recent forays into watercolors and ceramics reveal a great deal of freedom in handling the material. Even in the occasionally macabre examples of his recent work, there is the evidence of joy and a sense of play in dealing with the material.

Testimonials

BIODATA

About Artist

Khakhar's work had been characterized by a rare irreverence and a lack of inhibition about his lack of formal training. Indeed, he had been able to evolve his own mode of address that harnesses this lack of training to provide an edge to his expressions. His early work made use of ready-made images of deities from popular oleographs which were collaged and painted over, sometimes with graffiti.

Khakhar's interest in 'degenerate' forms of art led him to an exploration of artistic conventions in hybrid traditions that operate in the interregnum between classical miniatures and European illusionism. A deliberate naiveld is visible in his paintings from the 1970s, coupled with a deeply felt sympathy with his subjects, who are often ordinary folk caught in an existence they do not quite understand. There is also biting comment on the gentle stupidity of petit bourgeois life: a quality of being frozen in time perineates several of these representations of common people in all their vulnerability. The vulnerability argument is taken a step further in the early 1980s, when Khakhar's homoerotic concerns come to be openly declared, often with self-referential figures.

The 1980s also bring a move away from the blown-up-picture- postcard painting to spatial arrangements of greater complexity and articulation. Observation of the everyday plays an important role in Khakhar's work, and he is able to zero in on 'typical' characters that the observer can often locate within his/her own experience. He seems to have taken on a project of devising a way of representing the marginal seeking to show that which is always there, but never gets looked at. Khakhar has devised a way of rendering the body with an unusual plainness, like a bone-less structure, that highlights the twin arguments of vulnerability and invisibility that he maintains. His recent forays into watercolors and ceramics reveal a great deal of freedom in handling the material. Even in the occasionally macabre examples of his recent work, there is the evidence of joy and a sense of play in dealing with the material.