[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted:10:43:46 04/09/06 SunIn reply to:
Greg
's message, "Re: Shireland Update" on 23:10:59 01/06/06 Fri
Just to clear the air, I was the photographer involved in the "porn" incident. The story got so blown out of proportion it's amazing. I was shooting a model and we were shooting very artistic nude shots - no porn. I chose Shireland because of the uniqueness of the land and it's remotness. we shooting very beautiful work with light and shadow. The deputies who arrested us tried to talk the person who pressed the charges (someone who leases the land) into dropping them because they thought we weren't doing any harm and were being respectful of the property. After we appeared 3 times in court the charges were dropped because he didn't show up to court any of those times.

Just wanted to clarify what we were doing. Storeis can really get exagerated when people don't know the truth.

>Yeah, man its a shame to see Shireland go. That place
>was always a cool place for urban exploration. I knew
>this day would come, that Shireland would be wiped
>out. It took more than 15 years. I Just wonder if
>Tom Smrt is going to sell the property after
>demolishing his buildings. I would assume so,
>although he has been paying hundreds of thousands of
>property tax dollars all these years why would he sell
>now? And what kind of porn star would go in there and
>have a photoshoot?? I wonder where they shot these
>photos, this must have been very sleasy..every
>building is vandalised to hell in that place. Tom
>Smrt got a permit to demo 6 of the 8 buildings it
>says. I wonder which buildings he wants to keep.
>Maybe the two storage facilities in the rear of the
>park where he kept all his spray paint cans for all
>the vandals to use? Well Shireland, you were a neat
>place with a twisted background. This was a once and
>a lifetime kind of place. RIP Shireland, and good
>luck Mr. Smrt.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]