Bruce Adams wrote:
> Bill Baxter Wrote:
> >> Just curious how many folks are actually using D2.x already. Reply
>> here, or if you'd like to keep the noise on the NG down, just respond with this no-reg-required poll:
>> >> http://www.billbaxter.com/tmp/d2poll.html>> >> --bb
> > I'm using 2.0. I started with it because there didn't seem any point
> using the older version. I get some new features I want to play with.
> I have had no worries about it being a moving target. It doesn't
> move that fast. I've never tried Tango because Phobos is the standard
> library so naturally I started with that. However, I have yet to cut
> my teeth on a really big public facing project.
I'm with Bruce for all the same reasons :)
Regan

Bill Baxter Wrote:
> Just curious how many folks are actually using D2.x already.
> Reply here, or if you'd like to keep the noise on the NG down, just
> respond with this no-reg-required poll:
> > http://www.billbaxter.com/tmp/d2poll.html> > --bb
using only 2.0 - but wished someone would port more parts of tango as an ADDON to phobos.

Bill Baxter Wrote:
> Just curious how many folks are actually using D2.x already.
> Reply here, or if you'd like to keep the noise on the NG down, just
> respond with this no-reg-required poll:
> > http://www.billbaxter.com/tmp/d2poll.html> > --bb
No.
Part of it could be that I'm using Tango and it doesn't support 2.x. The bigger part is that I don't know how much work it'll be to port to 2.x alpha and the later 2.x when const is fixed. It's a shame the discussions about why that is and how to fix it died on this NG. It'd be nice to see a plan ahead for const in 2.x (that'd help soothe my issues)

Bill Baxter escribió:
> Just curious how many folks are actually using D2.x already.
> Reply here, or if you'd like to keep the noise on the NG down, just respond with this no-reg-required poll:
> > http://www.billbaxter.com/tmp/d2poll.html> > --bb
As a Tango user, no. It's also not very appealing to know that D2 is so const-dependent and that at some point the entire const system is going to change.
--
Carlos Santander Bernal

On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 05:41:21AM +0900, Bill Baxter wrote:
> Just curious how many folks are actually using D2.x already.
Yes, I am, for most my newer (small) projects. It is const and invariant that pulled me in. While it can be a little annoying at times, I think it is making for better code in the end.
My older projects still use D 1.0, just because I don't want to port all that code or the libraries I wrote that they depend on over to 2.0.
> --bb
--
Adam D. Ruppe
http://arsdnet.net

Bill Baxter wrote:
> Just curious how many folks are actually using D2.x already.
> Reply here, or if you'd like to keep the noise on the NG down, just respond with this no-reg-required poll:
> > http://www.billbaxter.com/tmp/d2poll.html> > --bb
No. Still having too much fun with 1.0, and got enough to keep me busy without thinking about the const debate. The appealing features in D2.0 are
__traits(allMembers) and now overload sets.

In Descent we are mainly focusing on doing the semantic analysis for D1.x, since D2.x is a constantly moving target.
Bill Baxter wrote:
> Just curious how many folks are actually using D2.x already.
> Reply here, or if you'd like to keep the noise on the NG down, just respond with this no-reg-required poll:
> > http://www.billbaxter.com/tmp/d2poll.html> > --bb