Sunday, June 30, 2013

George Zimmerman’s mock trial continues in a kangaroo courtroom within the boundaries of Sanford Florida. Prosecution witnesses are making the case for Zimmerman’s attorneys, who are picking them apart one by one. Plaintiff witnesses appear unprepared, ill-informed to subject matters under discussion and deceptive on cross examination. Prosecutors have a mountain of exculpatory evidence, which displays Zimmerman’s innocence. Yet an orchestrated rush to judgment by media moguls and an out of control Department of Justice caused this mock trial to go forward. Trayvon Martin’s death is a tragedy no doubt, but the fraudulent substance of this case should never have seen the inside of a courtroom. Trayvon Martin’s parents have profited handsomely from this egregious event, receiving a multiple million dollar settlement from the community where he died. Neither guilt nor innocence were on the minds of community leaders when they forked out the money. Instead, reprisal in some format was their greatest fear.Martin’s parents continue their travels to receive support, while the case is still hot.

Race has been the central core of this prosecution. Plaintiff’s attorneys have stumbled in their attempts to flood the jury’s ears with any element of race they could bring to bear in this case. The ugliness of the prosecutions overreach to find an innocent man guilty goes to a deeper issue, plaintiff attorneys manufactured a racial issue to move this case forward, enabled by the media. In the event the prosecution had one ounce of honesty within its legal team they would have stated Zimmerman’s lack of knowledge of Trayvon’s race. As a reminder this horrific event occurred in the early evening hours of the 26th of February 2012. Darkness was encroaching the area involved, accompanied by rain. George Zimmerman initiated his ill-fated follow of Trayvon without any preconceived notion of his race. Crime in the community was on an upswing and neighborhood watch groups were attempting to get a handle on the problem. In Zimmerman’s mind Trayvon appeared suspicious and he followed him. The rest is history. The Department of Justice forced a case based on race down Florida’s proverbial throat. In essence, the Justice Department and Eric Holder are on Trial. With their win at all costs attitude Zimmerman’s innocence is secondary. Accusing Zimmerman of a racial hate crime, when all the facts point in another direction, displays a Department of Justice that has no sense of righteousness or morality. When George Zimmerman wins this case and he will, Holder should be forced to relinquish his position. Unfortunately, Holder has immunity from prosecution, yet he deserves the same legal wrath he brought to bear on Zimmerman. Mark Davis MD, President of Healthnets Review Services, www.healthnetsreviewservices.com, platomd@gmail.com twitter.com/americassage, Author of Demons of Democracy and the forthcoming book, Obamacare: Dead on Arrival, A Prescription for Disaster. In the event you would care to debate this issue or others, join us in the group, Government in Transition, on LinkedIn.

Saturday, June 29, 2013

George Zimmerman’s mock
trial continues in a kangaroo courtroom within the boundaries of Sanford
Florida. Prosecution witnesses are making the case for Zimmerman’s attorneys,
who are picking them apart one by one. Plaintiff witnesses appear unprepared, ill-informed
to subject matters under discussion and deceptive on cross examination.
Prosecutors have a mountain of exculpatory evidence, which displays Zimmerman’s
innocence. Yet an orchestrated rush to judgment by media moguls and an out of
control Department of Justice caused this mock trial to go forward. Trayvon
Martin’s death is a tragedy no doubt, but the fraudulent substance of this case
should never have seen the inside of a courtroom. Trayvon Martin’s parents have
profited handsomely from this egregious event, receiving a multiple million dollar
settlement from the community where he died. Neither guilt nor innocence were
on the minds of community leaders when they forked out the money. Instead,
reprisal in some format was their greatest fear.Martin’s parents continue their travels to
receive support, while the case is still hot.

Race has been the central
core of this prosecution. Plaintiff’s attorneys have stumbled in their attempts
to flood the jury’s ears with any element of race they could bring to bear in
this case. The ugliness of the prosecutions overreach to find an innocent man
guilty goes to a deeper issue, plaintiff attorneys manufactured a racial issue
to move this case forward, enabled by the media. In the event the prosecution
had one ounce of honesty within its legal team they would have stated Zimmerman’s
lack of knowledge of Trayvon’s race. As a reminder this horrific event occurred
in the early evening hours of the 26th of February 2012. Darkness
was encroaching the area involved, accompanied by rain. George Zimmerman
initiated his ill-fated follow of Trayvon without any preconceived notion of
his race. Crime in the community was on an upswing and neighborhood watch
groups were attempting to get a handle on the problem. In Zimmerman’s mind
Trayvon appeared suspicious and he followed him. The rest is history. The
Department of Justice forced a case based on race down Florida’s proverbial
throat. In essence, the Justice Department and Eric Holder are on Trial. With their win at all costs attitude Zimmerman’s
innocence is secondary. Accusing Zimmerman of a racial hate crime, when all the
facts point in another direction, displays a Department of Justice that has no
sense of righteousness or morality. When George Zimmerman wins this case and he
will, Holder should be forced to relinquish his position. Unfortunately, Holder
has immunity from prosecution, yet he deserves the same legal wrath he brought
to bear on Zimmerman. Mark Davis MD, President of Healthnets Review Services, www.healthnetsreviewservices.com,
platomd@gmail.com
twitter.com/americassage, Author of Demons of Democracy and the forthcoming
book, Obamacare: Dead on Arrival, A Prescription for Disaster. In the event you
would care to debate this issue or others, join us in the group, Government in
Transition, on LinkedIn.

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Marco Rubio’s fraudulent immigration bill is nothing more than a series of false assertions that hide the truth of this pending legislation. Rubio has been all over the media with interviews, commercials and ads purporting immigration reform is a moral imperative. On close examination of his words, they are nothing but a series of misrepresentations and outright lies. His claim that illegals will not receive federal entitlements if legalized is a sham. Most entitlements are managed by state political machinery not on the federal level. Presently millions of our friends from south of the border partake in these goodies and that will continue under his immigration disaster. With few exceptions for those with criminal backgrounds, all those illicitly in America are welcome under his plan. Rubio wants to bring his illicit comrades out of the shadows so they will eventually become taxpaying members of this society. The truth is once legalized the Democratic Party will have tens of millions of new voters, guaranteeing the left stays in power for decades to come. Border security was never his or the “Gang of Eight’s” top priority. Instead, Rubio and his collaborators buried the most important element of immigration reform deep in this fraudulent legislative effort, legalizing illegals first then finding solutions for border security later. Rubio has been flooded with negative fanfare concerning his border security stance. His first response was the fines from illegals, on the path to citizenship, would help pay for a secured border. When that crock of nonsense didn’t fly, the Gang of Eight derived a 30 billion dollar scheme to enhance border security. This waste of taxpayer funds comes with one caveat, the Executive Branch will be left in charge of these funds, therefore nothing will change on the border. One lie after the next from this once rising star in the Republican Party. Immigration reform may not be dead. Yet, the scent of this decaying legislative effort has been sensed by tens of millions, who know when they are being scammed. Rubio may intend to run for President. The question is: in which party? Mark Davis MD, President of Healthnet ReviewServices,www.healthnetsreviewservices.com

platomd@gmail.com Twitter.com/americassage. Author of Demons of Democracy and the forthcoming book, Obamacare: Dead on Arrival, A Prescription for Disaster. Manager of the group on LinkedIn, Government in Transition.

Marco
Rubio’s fraudulent immigration bill is nothing more than a series of false
assertions that hide the truth of this pending legislation. Rubio has been all
over the media with interviews, commercials and ads purporting immigration
reform is a moral imperative. On close examination of his words, they are
nothing but a series of misrepresentations and outright lies. His claim that
illegals will not receive federal entitlements if legalized is a sham. Most
entitlements are managed by state political machinery not on the federal level.
Presently millions of our friends from south of the border partake in these
goodies and that will continue under his immigration disaster. With few
exceptions for those with criminal backgrounds, all those illicitly in America
are welcome under his plan. Rubio wants to bring his illicit comrades out of
the shadows so they will eventually become taxpaying members of this society. The
truth is once legalized the Democratic Party will have tens of millions of new
voters, guaranteeing the left stays in power for decades to come. Border
security was never his or the “Gang of Eight’s” top priority. Instead, Rubio
and his collaborators buried the most important element of immigration reform
deep in this fraudulent legislative effort, legalizing illegals first then
finding solutions for border security later. Rubio has been flooded with
negative fanfare concerning his border security stance. His first response was
the fines from illegals, on the path to citizenship, would help pay for a
secured border. When that crock of nonsense didn’t fly, the Gang of Eight
derived a 30 billion dollar scheme to enhance border security. This waste of
taxpayer funds comes with one caveat, the Executive Branch will be left in
charge of these funds, therefore nothing will change on the border. One lie
after the next from this once rising star in the Republican Party. Immigration
reform may not be dead. Yet, the scent of this decaying legislative effort has
been sensed by tens of millions, who know when they are being scammed. Rubio
may intend to run for President. The question is: in which party? Mark Davis
MD, President of Healthnet ReviewServices,www.healthnetsreviewservices.com

platomd@gmail.com Twitter.com/americassage.
Author of Demons of Democracy and the forthcoming book, Obamacare: Dead on
Arrival, A Prescription for Disaster. Manager of the group on LinkedIn,
Government in Transition.

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

In 2010 a report noted that 1 in 5 Americans took at least one prescription pharmaceutical to treat a psychological condition such as depression or anxiety. This means that 20% of our population takes a medication which can alter mood, behavior and judgment. Drug testing has been imposed on numerous groups in our society by overreaching government bureaucrats whose need to know appears to outweigh our privacy rights. Students who participate in sports many times are under the gun to take a drug test. Worksites often have a drug test requirement. Pilots, military personnel and even we lowly physicians have been coerced into testing. Yet somehow the very people that create and enforce drugs laws have found a manner to maneuver around drug testing regulations. Judges who render critical decisions about our lives appear to have escaped the very sanction they impose on others. Judges collectively are drawn from the same pool of people the rest of come from. With 20% of the populations’ brains immersed in mind bending medications it stands to reason that at least 20% of judges are prescribed these medications. In Maryland this author has had numerous opportunities to appear before lower court judges. Many times these judges were conflictive, confrontational and on several occasions deprecating inexcusably out of proportion to the topic being discussed. A judge in the Howard County Circuit Court appeared to be mumbling to himself as he considered a case. Another judge in the Federal Court in Baltimore appeared to have difficulty focusing his mind on the case before him. Mind altering drugs can affect the neural machinery that enables the brain to arrive at a specific decision. Judges are not immune to these medications. With the important roles judges play in society petitioners coming before them must be assured their arbiters are of sound mind. Drug testing judges would provide assurances to the public that we don’t have an odd ball sitting behind the bench. Additionally, along with the yearly drug test, a brief psychological evaluation would provide the necessary information to keep the mentally disinclined off the bench. Maryland has not instituted any significant reviews of their judges in these respects and the public has a right to know if a member of the judiciary is psychologically impaired. Mark Davis MD, President of Healthnets Review Services, advisor to the media and others on health and related issues. platomd@gmail.com Author of the book Demons of Democracy and the forthcoming book, Obamacare: Dead on Arrival, A Prescription for Disaster. Manager of the group on LinkedIn, Government in Transition. Twitter.com/americassage.

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

In 2010 a report noted
that 1 in 5 Americans took at least one prescription pharmaceutical to treat a
psychological condition such as depression or anxiety. This means that 20% of
our population takes a medication which can alter mood, behavior and judgment.
Drug testing has been imposed on numerous groups in our society by overreaching
government bureaucrats whose need to know appears to outweigh our privacy
rights. Students who participate in sports many times are under the gun to take
a drug test. Worksites often have a drug test requirement. Pilots, military
personnel and even we lowly physicians have been coerced into testing. Yet
somehow the very people that create and enforce drugs laws have found a manner
to maneuver around drug testing regulations. Judges who render critical
decisions about our lives appear to have escaped the very sanction they impose
on others. Judges collectively are drawn from the same pool of people the rest
of come from. With 20% of the populations’ brains immersed in mind bending
medications it stands to reason that at least 20% of judges are prescribed
these medications. In Maryland this author has had numerous opportunities to
appear before lower court judges. Many times these judges were conflictive,
confrontational and on several occasions deprecating inexcusably out of
proportion to the topic being discussed. A judge in the Howard County Circuit
Court appeared to be mumbling to himself as he considered a case. Another judge
in the Federal Court in Baltimore appeared to have difficulty focusing his mind
on the case before him. Mind altering drugs can affect the neural machinery
that enables the brain to arrive at a specific decision. Judges are not immune
to these medications. With the important roles judges play in society
petitioners coming before them must be assured their arbiters are of sound
mind. Drug testing judges would provide assurances to the public that we don’t
have an odd ball sitting behind the bench. Additionally, along with the yearly
drug test, a brief psychological evaluation would provide the necessary
information to keep the mentally disinclined off the bench. Maryland has not
instituted any significant reviews of their judges in these respects and the
public has a right to know if a member of the judiciary is psychologically
impaired. Mark Davis MD, President of Healthnets Review Services, advisor to
the media and others on health and related issues. platomd@gmail.com Author of the book Demons of Democracy and the
forthcoming book, Obamacare: Dead on Arrival, A Prescription for Disaster.
Manager of the group on LinkedIn, Government in Transition.
Twitter.com/americassage.

Monday, June 17, 2013

Syria is immersed in a civil war whose incipience dates from March of 2011. Popular demonstrations during that time were concurrent with the Arab Spring in other countries, which called for transitions in their various governments. In Syria, protesters vehemently demanded Syrian President Bashar al-Assad immediately step-down from his long-term post. Equally as significant, they wanted an end to Ba’ath Party rule. Assad responded to these civil protests with violent acts including but not limited to mass shootings, torture, and outright murders of political dissidents. Assad came to power on the heels of his father, Hafez al-Assad, who died in 2000. Desperate to hold onto the reins of power, Bashar has shown he will go to the extreme. Recent revelations his army used chemical weapons on civilians displays he will do anything to quell the opposition. Estimates of 100, 000 casualties to date, from this civil war, creates a growing pressure on the surrounding countries to find a solution to this “uncivil conflict.” Countries and rogue political groups are involving themselves in the mix. Hezbollah has sided with the Syrian regime while Al-Qaeda has moved in the direction of the rebels. Russia has sent munitions to Assad and recent news reveals Iran is sending 4,000 troops to aid the current regime. As the days go by, more needless deaths are paraded across World Media outlets. Within the last week, the Executive Branch has decided to aid the rebels with a level of armaments yet to be determined. Obama Administration officials know that once the two sides find common ground and settle their differences the newly unified country will return to its hate America posture. Why provide Syria with weapons knowing that enemies of this country will take possession of them?Obama’s penchant to place Muslim interests before those of Americans is very well known. Similar to the minor pretext used by the Johnson Administration to involve the nation in Vietnam, Obama is taking a page from history and repeating an error. In this case, Obama’s pretext is utilization by the Syrian regime of chemical weapons on a small number of its citizens. America is risking involvement in a conflict which can quickly explode into a regional war. Polls, taken by both major political persuasions, show overwhelmingly lack of enthusiasm to enter this civil war. While ancient John McCain pushes for our hand in the mix, Sarah Palin has shouted from her media pulpit the reverse. From a historical perspective, America will inch its way forward towards full involvement, including boots on the ground. In nearly every decision President Obama has made on foreign policy, the consequences have been nothing less than fatal to a country that has seen enough war. America should stay out Syria, nothing good will come from our involvement. Mark Davis MD, President of Healthnets Review Services, platomd@gmail.com, www.healthnetsreviewservices.com, Author of the book Demons of Democracy and the forthcoming work, Obamacare: Dead on Arrival, A Prescription for Disaster. Manager of the group on LinkedIn, Government in Transition. Join, comment and debate with some of the best minds on LinkedIn. Look for us on twitter.com/americassage.

Syria is immersed in a
civil war whose incipience dates from March of 2011. Popular demonstrations
during that time were concurrent with the Arab Spring in other countries, which
called for transitions in their various governments. In Syria, protesters
vehemently demanded Syrian President Bashar al-Assad immediately step-down from
his long-term post. Equally as significant, they wanted an end to Ba’ath Party
rule. Assad responded to these civil protests with violent acts including but
not limited to mass shootings, torture, and outright murders of political
dissidents. Assad came to power on the heels of his father, Hafez al-Assad, who
died in 2000. Desperate to hold onto the reins of power, Bashar has shown he
will go to the extreme. Recent revelations his army used chemical weapons on
civilians displays he will do anything to quell the opposition. Estimates of
100, 000 casualties to date, from this civil war, creates a growing pressure on
the surrounding countries to find a solution to this “uncivil conflict.”
Countries and rogue political groups are involving themselves in the mix.
Hezbollah has sided with the Syrian regime while Al-Qaeda has moved in the
direction of the rebels. Russia has sent munitions to Assad and recent news
reveals Iran is sending 4,000 troops to aid the current regime. As the days go
by, more needless deaths are paraded across World Media outlets. Within the
last week, the Executive Branch has decided to aid the rebels with a level of
armaments yet to be determined. Obama Administration officials know that once
the two sides find common ground and settle their differences the newly unified
country will return to its hate America posture. Why provide Syria with weapons
knowing that enemies of this country will take possession of them?Obama’s penchant to place Muslim interests
before those of Americans is very well known. Similar to the minor pretext used
by the Johnson Administration to involve the nation in Vietnam, Obama is taking
a page from history and repeating an error. In this case, Obama’s pretext is
utilization by the Syrian regime of chemical weapons on a small number of its
citizens. America is risking involvement in a conflict which can quickly explode
into a regional war. Polls, taken by both major political persuasions, show
overwhelmingly lack of enthusiasm to enter this civil war. While ancient John McCain
pushes for our hand in the mix, Sarah Palin has shouted from her media pulpit
the reverse. From a historical perspective, America will inch its way forward
towards full involvement, including boots on the ground. In nearly every
decision President Obama has made on foreign policy, the consequences have been
nothing less than fatal to a country that has seen enough war. America should
stay out Syria, nothing good will come from our involvement. Mark Davis MD,
President of Healthnets Review Services, platomd@gmail.com,
www.healthnetsreviewservices.com,
Author of the book Demons of Democracy and the forthcoming work, Obamacare:
Dead on Arrival, A Prescription for Disaster. Manager of the group on LinkedIn,
Government in Transition. Join, comment and debate with some of the best minds
on LinkedIn. Look for us on twitter.com/americassage.

Saturday, June 15, 2013

There are many elements to aging, some are in our control others are not. Diet, has been found to be a major contributor in determining one’s longevity. Nutrition Science has moved from the laboratory into practical use. Recent studies indicate that certain foods and food groups can extend lifespan dramatically. Scientists have fed lab animals, such as mice and rats, high protein diets with restricted caloric resulting in startling outcomes. Animals, of the same litter, who were fed this enhanced diet had lifespans that were extended by 50% or longer over their littermates. Studies such as these continue to display similar findings. The conclusions were obvious. Diet manipulation plays into the formula for longevity. Elevated protein diets with restricted calories, is theorized to enhance cellular physiology. Proteins are more efficiently broken down by cells than their counterparts, carbohydrates. With diets that rely on heavy loads of carbs, cells have to work much harder to metabolize these foods. Hence, the cellular structures breakdown more rapidly. As these cells deteriorate immunity decreases, the shield for cancer and infections virtually disappears and the cells move into senescence more quickly. The Millenium Diet, embedded in the book, The Millenium Diet, The Practical Guide for Rapid Weight Loss, fleshes out this type of diet regimen. Patients who have used this type of diet find their weight drops rapidly, blood test results move quickly towards normal and note other physiological improvements. Mellenium Dieters cannot prove they will live another day longer, yet with rapid weight loss and improved blood profiles the evidence moves in that direction.Millenium Diet is utilized on four continents and has been reviewed to the nth degree by both professionals in the nutrition field and the dieters themselves. Those strongly desirous of rapid weight loss and improved health are encouraged to obtain a copy of this program. Access the book through Kindle, the Nook or any one of thousands of websites and bookstores. The Millenium Diet has replaced the antiquated diets of the past and will be the one to go to for the best results in the future. Mark Davis, MD. President of Healthnets Review Services and author of The Millenium Diet, The Practical Guide for Rapid Weight Loss. platomd@gmail.com ,milleniumdiet@gmail.com, www.healthnetsreviewservices.com

There are many elements to
aging, some are in our control others are not. Diet, has been found to be a
major contributor in determining one’s longevity. Nutrition Science has moved
from the laboratory into practical use. Recent studies indicate that certain
foods and food groups can extend lifespan dramatically. Scientists have fed lab
animals, such as mice and rats, high protein diets with restricted caloric
resulting in startling outcomes. Animals, of the same litter, who were fed this
enhanced diet had lifespans that were extended by 50% or longer over their
littermates. Studies such as these continue to display similar findings. The conclusions
were obvious. Diet manipulation plays into the formula for longevity. Elevated
protein diets with restricted calories, is theorized to enhance cellular
physiology. Proteins are more efficiently broken down by cells than their
counterparts, carbohydrates. With diets that rely on heavy loads of carbs,
cells have to work much harder to metabolize these foods. Hence, the cellular
structures breakdown more rapidly. As
these cells deteriorate immunity decreases, the shield for cancer and
infections virtually disappears and the cells move into senescence more
quickly. The Millenium Diet, embedded in the book, The Millenium Diet, The
Practical Guide for Rapid Weight Loss, fleshes out this type of diet regimen.
Patients who have used this type of diet find their weight drops rapidly, blood
test results move quickly towards normal and note other physiological
improvements. Mellenium Dieters cannot prove they will live another day longer,
yet with rapid weight loss and improved blood profiles the evidence moves in
that direction.Millenium Diet is
utilized on four continents and has been reviewed to the nth degree by both
professionals in the nutrition field and the dieters themselves. Those strongly
desirous of rapid weight loss and improved health are encouraged to obtain a
copy of this program. Access the book through Kindle, the Nook or any one of
thousands of websites and bookstores. The Millenium Diet has replaced the
antiquated diets of the past and will be the one to go to for the best results
in the future. Mark Davis, MD. President of Healthnets Review Services and
author of The Millenium Diet, The Practical Guide for Rapid Weight Loss. platomd@gmail.com ,milleniumdiet@gmail.com, www.healthnetsreviewservices.com

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Lawyers have undermined every institution and tradition that has made America great (ref: Demons of Democracy, 2011 Healthnets). The harm they have inflicted on this country is so egregious that mere words fail to express the full impact. Battalions of social science majors graduate yearly with degrees to nowhere. Many seek the safe harbor of a law school believing the road to success is a mere three years away, without considering the reality around them. Except for a few high end earners in each community, the rest struggle to justify the time they spent earning their degrees. Many seek the comfort and regular pay of government service, here is where they do the most damage. With no special talents in science, economics, health care, military management, religion, environment or sundry other fields they create and enforce draconian regulatory structure that benefits a few at the expense of many. Obamacare, as it has come to be known, was written end to end by lawyers to confound the health system not improve it. Environmental legislation that failed to pass in Congress, no problem for the legal profession, they simply embed the same regulations in treaties bypassing democratic procedures (reference Dick Morris’ book Screwed). From Wall Street to Main Street lawyers not only pump out the laws which continue to reduce freedoms, they are the enforcers. Prosecutors, by the thousands, have been less than honest with their judicial counterparts when presenting cases. Thousands have gone to jail, paid huge finds and in some cases spent an eternity by bars on false evidence. Duke Lacrosse debacle exemplifies the dishonesty embedded into the American prosecutorial system. Guess who manages the SEC, Lawyers. When Bernard Madoff made off with billions he had been under investigation from this fine unit of the government for years. The lawyers and only the lawyers stopped the revelations from surfacing about his activities, they even dropped the investigation. Lawyers are making billions defending illegals, with the taxpayer footing the bill. Every treaty they write gives the other party the benefit at guess whose expense. Perversion is part of their repertoire as they push homosexual marriage on the majority who believe it is a deviant form of existence. From dumb down education to weakening the military the hand of an ignorant lawyer is somewhere in the mix. Federal Government’s top four officials President, Vice President, Secretary of State and Attorney General each have the golden JD, the degree that has taken the best country on the face of the Earth and made us a joke around the World. Some new laws to look forwardto: 1) Owe taxes, you will not be able obtain a passport, 2) removing the requirement for prescription drugs as exemplified by a 12 year old’s ability to obtain birth control pills over the counter, 3) government mandate to control your thermostat, 4) taxes levied by the number of miles you drive, 5) forced payment of taxes on all winning at casinos, 6) forced government inspections of your homes for “environmental” purposes yearly, 7) abbreviating physician education, 8) a universal code for internet usage so Obama can know all activities you perform in cyberspace, 9) national identification cards for everyone ( remember the Germans asking for “Papers” in Indiana Jones, its coming soon), 10) Government will test each individual and assign you the profession of their choice not yours (see Brave New World by Aldous Huxley). Alarming as these potential laws may sound they are not some pipe dream by this author, they are being floated in different sections of our government to make life more “efficient” for all. Lawyers, lawyers and more lawyers are challenging the very basis of our democracy and they must be reined in. In the Book Demons of Democracy the astounding case is delineated how America has been maneuvered into a type of socialized democracy, a model of which has failed all over the World. My question to the reader is: When will Americans say “enough is enough” and stop the impending catastrophe by these Demons of Democracy. Mark Davis MD author of the latter book that warned America, tyranny is at our doorstep directly caused by the “legal profession.” platomd@gmail.com

Lawyers have undermined
every institution and tradition that has made America great (ref: Demons of
Democracy, 2011 Healthnets). The harm they have inflicted on this country is so
egregious that mere words fail to express the full impact. Battalions of social
science majors graduate yearly with degrees to nowhere. Many seek the safe
harbor of a law school believing the road to success is a mere three years
away, without considering the reality around them. Except for a few high end
earners in each community, the rest struggle to justify the time they spent
earning their degrees. Many seek the comfort and regular pay of government
service, here is where they do the most damage. With no special talents in
science, economics, health care, military management, religion, environment or
sundry other fields they create and enforce draconian regulatory structure that
benefits a few at the expense of many. Obamacare, as it has come to be known,
was written end to end by lawyers to confound the health system not improve it.
Environmental legislation that failed to pass in Congress, no problem for the
legal profession, they simply embed the same regulations in treaties bypassing
democratic procedures (reference Dick Morris’ book Screwed). From Wall Street
to Main Street lawyers not only pump out the laws which continue to reduce
freedoms, they are the enforcers. Prosecutors, by the thousands, have been less
than honest with their judicial counterparts when presenting cases. Thousands
have gone to jail, paid huge finds and in some cases spent an eternity by bars
on false evidence. Duke Lacrosse debacle exemplifies the dishonesty embedded
into the American prosecutorial system. Guess who manages the SEC, Lawyers.
When Bernard Madoff made off with billions he had been under investigation from
this fine unit of the government for years. The lawyers and only the lawyers
stopped the revelations from surfacing about his activities, they even dropped
the investigation. Lawyers are making billions defending illegals, with the
taxpayer footing the bill. Every treaty they write gives the other party the
benefit at guess whose expense. Perversion is part of their repertoire as they
push homosexual marriage on the majority who believe it is a deviant form of
existence. From dumb down education to weakening the military the hand of an
ignorant lawyer is somewhere in the mix. Federal Government’s top four
officials President, Vice President, Secretary of State and Attorney General
each have the golden JD, the degree that has taken the best country on the face
of the Earth and made us a joke around the World. Some new laws to look forwardto: 1) Owe taxes, you will not be able obtain a passport, 2) removing the requirement
for prescription drugs as exemplified by a 12 year old’s ability to obtain
birth control pills over the counter, 3) government mandate to control your
thermostat, 4) taxes levied by the number of miles you drive, 5) forced payment
of taxes on all winning at casinos, 6) forced government inspections of your
homes for “environmental” purposes yearly, 7) abbreviating physician education,
8) a universal code for internet usage so Obama can know all activities you
perform in cyberspace, 9) national identification cards for everyone ( remember
the Germans asking for “Papers” in Indiana Jones, its coming soon), 10)
Government will test each individual and assign you the profession of their
choice not yours (see Brave New World by Aldous Huxley). Alarming as these
potential laws may sound they are not some pipe dream by this author, they are
being floated in different sections of our government to make life more
“efficient” for all. Lawyers, lawyers and more lawyers are challenging the very
basis of our democracy and they must be reined in. In the Book Demons of
Democracy the astounding case is delineated how America has been maneuvered
into a type of socialized democracy, a model of which has failed all over the
World. My question to the reader is: When will Americans say “enough is enough”
and stop the impending catastrophe by these Demons of Democracy. Mark Davis MD
author of the latter book that warned America, tyranny is at our doorstep
directly caused by the “legal profession.” platomd@gmail.com

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Recent revelations that many facets of our communications are being monitored by government entities, is a chilling reminder of how far America has moved away from the Constitution. Edward Snowden, a former employee of Booz Allen Hamiliton, a defense contractor to the National Security Agency, was revealed as the source of the recent intelligence leaks. Now in hiding overseas, Snowden revealed yet another scandal surrounding the Obama White House. President Obama quickly responded to media criticisms of this obvious overreach by his Administration. He stated that a country to be safe from terrorism must give up some of its freedoms to achieve that goal. Democrats, in a harmonious chorus, noted the spying programs now in place were initiated under President Bush. The two glaring facts Democrats left unstated were: most of them voted for the Patriot Act which empowers these programs and the legislation only permits intercept of foreign communications not those of Americans within our borders. Much more insidious than trolling through our lives via social networks, the postal system and other forms of electronic eavesdropping is: how will the information be utilized?

Information that is brought to light which does not imply a terrorist threat, yet is incriminating under other circumstances could be violating a person’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Worse, in the event information is given to law enforcement officials, from these forays into our privacy, could the government be trampling on our Miranda Rights? Though Miranda addresses the spoken word in regards to self-incrimination, the written word is only an extension of its voiced counterpart, as recognized by law. Government’s intrusion into our private communications precludes a warning that information gathered might be used against us at some future date. Obama’s security teams skipped over the part in the law that advises Americans they should be notified of their Miranda Rights before these clear intrusions into our privacy occur. Sixteen hours after the Boston Marathon Bombing, Eric Holder’s team and a federal judge ran to the bedside of the bomber, Dzhokhar Tsamaev, to advise him of his Miranda rights. Why Eric Holder moved so quickly to quiet this murderer remains a mystery. Yet, in the minds of Obama Administration officials, terrorists have more rights than their victims. Edward Snowden’s controversial revelations only affirmed what most of us suspected, that Uncle Obama has moved into our backyards. Whether you consider Snowden a patriot, hero or traitor one thing for certain: he did us all a favor. Mark Davis MD, President of Healthnets Review Services, www.healthnetsreviewservices.com, platomd@gmail.com, Author of Demons of Democracy and the forthcoming book, Obamacare: Dead on Arrival, A Prescription for Disaster. Manager of the group on LinkedIn, Government in Transition.

Recent revelations that
many facets of our communications are being monitored by government entities,
is a chilling reminder of how far America has moved away from the Constitution.
Edward Snowden, a former employee of Booz Allen Hamiliton, a defense contractor
to the National Security Agency, was revealed as the source of the recent intelligence
leaks. Now in hiding overseas, Snowden revealed yet another scandal surrounding
the Obama White House. President Obama quickly responded to media criticisms of
this obvious overreach by his Administration. He stated that a country to be
safe from terrorism must give up some of its freedoms to achieve that goal. Democrats,
in a harmonious chorus, noted the spying programs now in place were initiated
under President Bush. The two glaring facts Democrats left unstated were: most
of them voted for the Patriot Act which empowers these programs and the
legislation only permits intercept of foreign communications not those of
Americans within our borders. Much more insidious than trolling through our
lives via social networks, the postal system and other forms of electronic
eavesdropping is: how will the information be utilized?

Information that is
brought to light which does not imply a terrorist threat, yet is incriminating
under other circumstances could be violating a person’s Fifth Amendment right
against self-incrimination. Worse, in the event information is given to law
enforcement officials, from these forays into our privacy, could the government
be trampling on our Miranda Rights? Though Miranda addresses the spoken word in
regards to self-incrimination, the written word is only an extension of its
voiced counterpart, as recognized by law. Government’s intrusion into our
private communications precludes a warning that information gathered might be
used against us at some future date. Obama’s security teams skipped over the
part in the law that advises Americans they should be notified of their Miranda
Rights before these clear intrusions into our privacy occur. Sixteen hours
after the Boston Marathon Bombing, Eric Holder’s team and a federal judge ran
to the bedside of the bomber, Dzhokhar Tsamaev, to advise him of his Miranda
rights. Why Eric Holder moved so quickly to quiet this murderer remains a
mystery. Yet, in the minds of Obama Administration officials, terrorists have
more rights than their victims. Edward Snowden’s controversial revelations only
affirmed what most of us suspected, that Uncle Obama has moved into our
backyards. Whether you consider Snowden a patriot, hero or traitor one thing
for certain: he did us all a favor. Mark Davis MD, President of Healthnets
Review Services, www.healthnetsreviewservices.com, platomd@gmail.com, Author of Demons of Democracy and the forthcoming book, Obamacare:
Dead on Arrival, A Prescription for Disaster. Manager of the group on LinkedIn,
Government in Transition.

Sunday, June 9, 2013

Harsh reality confronted a nation not ready to hear that a 10 year old, dying from Cystic Fibrosis, is having difficulty obtaining a lung transplantation. Sarah Murnaghan is in the end stages of of this horrific disease with compromised lungs and other organs affected. Sarah’s physicians note without an immediate pulmonary transplantation, she has only weeks to live. Cystic Fibrosis is a very complicated disease, of genetic origin, which could affect the entire body. Thick secretions obstruct airway channels resulting in poor respiratory function, which is the problem in this case. Sarah’s parents desperately want their daughter placed on the adult transplantation list. Unfortunately, the cut-off age is 12. More lungs are available to adults than children, therefore Sarah’s parents went public with their quest. Fox News, in its inimical style, damned the government for its insensitivity to this child and its position concerning Sarah’s parents attempts to have her placed on the adult list. More to the point, Fox blamed the Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, as did others, for not signing an order to have Sarah placed on the adult list. Sean Hannity went so far as stating this is reminiscent of death panels. Sebelius was willing to study the issue, yet she noted some will live and some will die. She was referring to the scarcity of transplantable organs available and the overabundance of potential recipients waiting for them. As insensitive as her message came across, she was correct. Three children in Sarah’s region of Pennsylvania are waiting transplantation as well as several dozen adults. Blaming Sebelius is absurd and adds to the political circus around this case. Does the name Terri Schiavo come to mind and the government’s overreach in that case. Fox conveniently forgot to mention that Sarah’s disease involves many other systems in her body. Any of which could potentially terminate her life. Media and political hack’s amnesia to other people awaiting transplants was also very obvious. The government is neither the cause of the patient’s condition nor controls its outcome. Bad genes and a lack of transplantable organs are the culprits. Many of us have children and feel the pain these parents are suffering. This is not the case to take a stand against Obamacare. Organ allocation is difficult and emotionally trying. Decisions made daily determine who lives and who dies. Unfortunately, it can be any one of us at the end to the stick. Sarah was given temporary reprieve this week by a court, which allowed her to be listed as an adult. As a physician and a father, I hope Sarah receives her lung transplant and lives a long life, epidemiological statistics of Cystic Fibrosis unfortunately state otherwise. Mark Davis MD, author of the forthcoming book, Obamacare: Dead on Arrival, A Prescription of Disaster and the book hated by attorneys, Demons of Democracy. President of Healthnets Review Services: www.healthnetsreviewservices.com, platomd@gmail.com, Manager of the group on LinkedIn, Government in Transition.

Harsh reality confronted a
nation not ready to hear that a 10 year old, dying from Cystic Fibrosis, is
having difficulty obtaining a lung transplantation. Sarah Murnaghan is in the
end stages of of this horrific disease with compromised lungs and other organs
affected. Sarah’s physicians note without an immediate pulmonary transplantation,
she has only weeks to live. Cystic Fibrosis is a very complicated disease, of
genetic origin, which could affect the entire body. Thick secretions obstruct airway
channels resulting in poor respiratory function, which is the problem in this
case. Sarah’s parents desperately want their daughter placed on the adult
transplantation list. Unfortunately, the cut-off age is 12. More lungs are
available to adults than children, therefore Sarah’s parents went public with
their quest. Fox News, in its inimical style, damned the government for its
insensitivity to this child and its position concerning Sarah’s parents
attempts to have her placed on the adult list. More to the point, Fox blamed
the Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, as did others, for
not signing an order to have Sarah placed on the adult list. Sean Hannity went
so far as stating this is reminiscent of death panels. Sebelius was willing to
study the issue, yet she noted some will live and some will die. She was
referring to the scarcity of transplantable organs available and the
overabundance of potential recipients waiting for them. As insensitive as her
message came across, she was correct. Three children in Sarah’s region of
Pennsylvania are waiting transplantation as well as several dozen adults.
Blaming Sebelius is absurd and adds to the political circus around this case.
Does the name Terri Schiavo come to mind and the government’s overreach in that
case. Fox conveniently forgot to mention that Sarah’s disease involves many
other systems in her body. Any of which could potentially terminate her life. Media
and political hack’s amnesia to other people awaiting transplants was also very
obvious. The government is neither the cause of the patient’s condition nor controls
its outcome. Bad genes and a lack of transplantable organs are the culprits. Many of us have children and feel the pain
these parents are suffering. This is not the case to take a stand against Obamacare.
Organ allocation is difficult and emotionally trying. Decisions made daily determine
who lives and who dies. Unfortunately, it can be any one of us at the end to
the stick. Sarah was given temporary reprieve this week by a court, which
allowed her to be listed as an adult. As a physician and a father, I hope Sarah
receives her lung transplant and lives a long life, epidemiological statistics of
Cystic Fibrosis unfortunately state otherwise. Mark Davis MD, author of the
forthcoming book, Obamacare: Dead on Arrival, A Prescription of Disaster and
the book hated by attorneys, Demons of Democracy. President of Healthnets Review
Services: www.healthnetsreviewservices.com,
platomd@gmail.com, Manager of the group
on LinkedIn, Government in Transition.

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Government in Transition is a discussion group on the LinkedIn website which has been established to discuss current political trends and the societal changes now occurring throughout the country. Recent revelations that Facebook is actively suppressing selective political commentary, especially conservative opinions, has caused many to seek other avenues to vent their thoughts. Facebook’s outright censorship is a consequence of its liberal leaning management. Twitter has also closed pages when they felt the information contained on them was not compatible with their own stated agenda. LinkedIn, as of this writing, has not displayed such an abuse of process. On the contrary, they invite commentary from an array of perspectives. Government in Transition seeks to bring together a variety of political and social commentary. Visitors to this discussion group will opine knowing their comments will not be censored in any manner or form. Cultural changes, inflicted on us by state and federal governing bodies, were ill-considered and there full ramifications have yet to come to fruition. From the social experiments in the military to the extreme redistribution of tax dollars, the mainstream media has treaded lightly on these subjects. With political entities working handed in hand with the left-wing media, discussion of these and other important issues do not receive the attention they deserve. Government in Transition is discussion group that allows people from all social, cultural and economic strata to come together and literally bang-heads on these topics. The manager of the group, Mark Davis MD, is endeavoring to draw media and government personnel into the mix to heighten the perspectives in the commentary. Yet, the most important commentary will be from those who make the country tick, people from outside the Washington D.C. beltway.Politicians and and others who administer our society should be taken to task for the detriment they have caused this nation in the last decade, especially in the last five years. Government in Transition invites members of LinkedIn to join and comment on the current political trends now engrossing the country. In the event you do not belong to LinkedIn, it is free and worth the time to join. People have a right to be heard, Government in Transition is one place your comments will receive an excellent airing and response. Mark Davis MD, platomd@gmail.com. Author of the Book: Demons of Democracy and the forthcoming book, Obamacare: Dead on Arrival, A Prescription for Disaster.www.healthnetsreviewservices.com

Monday, June 3, 2013

Depravity
will be the signature achievement of the Obama Administration, once its history
is finally written. Obama’s clarion call to teenagers that fornication is acceptable,
even if children are under 15 years of age, should have been a wake-up call to
every parent in America. Worse, he gave these children a way out if a pregnancy
occurs, over-the-counter birth control. When the latter means fails, no
problem, abortion on demand will be available on request. Parental consent, not
any more, Obama’s programs allow the government to intercede in many cases. Obama’s devilish work does not stop with
childhood fornication, his push to have the gay agenda fully accepted by
society continues unabated. From the military and marriage to school
curriculums and now the Boy Scouts homosexuality is being forced on a
population that would rather see this disgusting behavior back in the closet.
Military has seen an exponential jump in the number cases of sexual harassment
in the last few years, after Obama gave his blessing to an openly gay armed
forces. He forgot to ask the soldiers how they feel about sleeping, bathing and
living in close quarters with openly gay individuals. Obama’s intent to enable
the “gay establishment” to make homosexual marriage as acceptable as the
traditional version displays his profound level of deviance from the normal
course of human thinking. School systems are slowly implementing curriculums
that explore the gay lifestyle, backed by funds from Uncle Obama. This filth is
not limited to the upper grades, impressionable minds in lower schools are
being introduced to the “new norm” as well. With a complaisant Department of
Justice at his backside Obama and the gay gang’s next stop was the Boy Scouts
of America. Much consideration went into the Scouts recent decision to allow
openly gay children into their ranks, most of it from fear of lawsuits. Yet,
the gay crowd is not fully happy with this decision. They aspire to have gay
Scout leaders leading these packs of children. Time will soon come when the Boy
Scouts of America disbands, because the majority of normal parents do not want
their children exposed to such trash. Obama’s attack on the fundamentals of
religion and traditional society comes on the heels of a push to move atheism
into the forefront of religious thought. In this case, Obama’s moves imbue our
culture with a sense of worthlessness. His policies and programs turn the population
away from the elements it needs most, a belief in a higher power and the
organizational structure implemented by that power. Moral decay and social
stagnation were two reasons why Rome fell, America appears to be heading in the
same direction. Obama’s deviances need to be checked or America will become
Sodom and Gomorrah on steroids. Mark Davis MD, platomd@gmail.com, www.healthnetsreviewservices.com,
President of Healthnets Review Services, Author of Demons of Democracy and the
forthcoming book, Obamacare: Dead on Arrival, A Precription for Disaster.
Manager of the group on LinkedIn, Government in Transition (join, comment and
debate).