Adam, only 6,000 yrs old?

Yes I heard this, I think Arnold Murrey teaches this. I dunno. I for one know that The Satan was an Invention of the Church. It would be more like
the Advasary.
Wasnt the Sumerian the ones that have the Oldest creation story on record? 5,000 yrs old vs our K.J 500.

that 160 000 year old skull is unlike any modern human I've seen, it looks creepy. If the earth is billions of years old, this could be the tenth
time that modern humans reached this peak. It is hard to know any timelines of such length for certain. 160 000 years is the date claimed, but if it
was 16 000 years old, off by a factor of ten, we'd never know. That is far longer a timeperiod than we have recorded history for, and the facts from
that long ago are elusive at best, and include a healthy amount of speculation. The Sumerians had some very similar stories to the Bible.

Adamae and Edenu have been cited as being Babylonian terms meaning earthling and paradise. They named the first God/human hybrid Adamae, in their
texts.
Even Genesis has two creation accounts for humans, and maybe the first ones were asexual, which the text does not refute, and even seems to imply.

Thats a very old skull. It does look like a human skull ( to me) and so this alone should prove that mans been here longer then what the Church says.
Divine Interventions... well who were the Ones that CAME DOWN?
since the Sumerians Text also mentions this an this is an older account of what happen.
I do believe that alot of texts were supressed because the Church had a more of a Control, for power and money, Greed, so they had to mislead the
masses to be able to control them.
I believe that some type of Man was here before the Homo sapiens type man got here.
didnt they say that early Mans DNA is different then Modern man?

Exactly how old are the soils at the Topper site? Al Goodyear isn't sure yet. Materials recovered from the top of the pre-Clovis level date to
15,000-16,000 calendar years old--and there appear to be artifacts a meter below that! "We may be able to add a few thousand years to that," says
Dr. Goodyear with obvious restraint, "since there are artifact-bearing sediments below the 16,000-year-old zone."

In the pre-Clovis level he has recovered stone flakes and what appear to be tools. According to one expert in microscopy, they show signs of use wear.
And they definitely aren't Clovis. As far as Goodyear and his colleagues can tell, they're pre-Clovis and they're man-made.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.