Many multiculturalists will point out the Eve theory of evolution where everyone supposedly came from Africa and that we are all one human race.

The only opposition scientifically is the multi-regional theorists who advocate the multiregional theory of evolution.

What is European white nationalists opinions on this subject?

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnJoyTree

Varying.

I favour OOA as the one best supported by evidence.

There is however a definite preference of multi-regionalism among the generality of WN, a bit of wishful thinking I consider rather weak-minded.

Here's the short of it. M and N are assumed to be offshoots of L simply because L is older than M and N. That's the thing. It is assumed. The fact that M and N are the same age and suppose to be offshoots of L seems to be an anomaly of sorts. M and N aren't offshoots of L but the oldest surviving Eurasian Eves, not offshoots of L. All this evidence that points to the OOA fairytale is based on an assumption of M and N.

I don't understand, if you believe in evolution then I'm guessing you also believe in Pangaea. Saying that the human race originated in Africa clearly doesn't make sense.

I personally believe that Negroids are a pre-Adamic creation by God, as one user already stated, and that before the great flood Noah gathered male and female Negroids, "a higher order of monkey", and that is why they survived the great flood.

I am the username:

A man with questions.

Anyhow I thought it is interesting that you would bring up the subject of Pangaea.

I still believe the theory of evolution is still nothing more than that...a theory and not fact, and I don't believe it. Needless to say, I think the Out of Africa doesn't hold water either. I think there was a pre-Adamic creation by God...other races were created at this time, including cro-magnon, homo erectus etc...along with now extinct reptiles and mammals of all sorts...

Here's the short of it. M and N are assumed to be offshoots of L simply because L is older than M and N. That's the thing. It is assumed. The fact that M and N are the same age and suppose to be offshoots of L seems to be an anomaly of sorts. M and N aren't offshoots of L but the oldest surviving Eurasian Eves, not offshoots of L. All this evidence that points to the OOA fairytale is based on an assumption of M and N.

OOA is poo poo.

Indeed it is interesting, yet of course there is an assumption being made for either case of course.
As Homo erectus and homo habilis are older than Cro Magnon, we assume that they split and "died out", but that the following segments of man were derived offshots thereof.

Indeed it is interesting, yet of course there is an assumption being made for either case of course.
As Homo erectus and homo habilis are older than Cro Magnon, we assume that they split and "died out", but that the following segments of man were derived offshots thereof.

All that we need to know is M and N are the same age. It is statistically improbable {that is very highly improbable} to have two distinct markers offshoot from at the same time. Now can you name any other two markers that have done the same? L is older than M and N. That is all we really know for sure. The rest is mere assumption.

I agree they out of Africa answer sounds likely, in truth we can only use fossils, tools, bones and waste as any sort of guide. The time span involved in these changes we can only estimate, some may even say invent, just how long humans or humanoids have existed in or out of Africa. I have read figures that state from 100,000 to 150.000 years ago a number of people began journeys north and east, ultimately covering much of the globe. These individuals must have been seeking a better life, more resources, their own territory, etc.

One thing many people may hate me for saying is that individuals who undertook such a journey are not the weak, but are in fact the strong. Thousands of people heading off into the unknown with only there wits and no doubt and ever increasing appreciation of working together in order to survive. That brings us to the question did the cream leave and all that remained was milk, mmm.

If the figure was a 100,000 years, could anyway even understand or appreciate just how many generations lived, struggled and prospered within the west and the east. To say that the no fundamental change in brain chemistry, looks, outlook, gods and goddesses, etc, would not come about in this time would be completely wrong in my view. It could be argued that over such a huge length of time fundamental changes from their home country are very believable and followes good old Charles Darwin theories on species development.

Adaptations in animals can take a great deal of time to come about, unless some climatic event accelerates the change or rich food sources speed up the processes already under way. It could be argued that the significant visual and anthropological evidence to the difference between races only means Darwin was right. The new religion of the unseen elephant is now a religious passage for many Caucasians, to state you see they elephant means a trial as in the olden days, similar to being burnt at the stake for saying the world is round, I guess. We see you elephant