On 10/16/2012 7:40 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> These are not small changes: a protocol state
> is added,
On 10/16/2012 7:55 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> In practice, this is a judgement call by the AD (is the scope of
> changes reasonable, is the community consensus clear, was this just an
> oversight, etc.).
In practice, I'm sure you are right that something like this is treated
as a judgement call.
It shouldn't be.
Paul's specific text, above, makes this something that is very, very far
over the line into obviously requiring being kicked back to the working
group.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net