Fervor Spreads To Overhaul State Agencies

State politicians who want to remake the education system are going
straight to the top, vowing to overhaul the very agencies and boards
that oversee local schools.

Bills and speeches targeting state bureaucracies trickle through
every legislative session. But in recent months the floodgates have
opened, and state education officials are wondering who will still be
afloat once the deluge subsides.

Thirty states are in the midst of, or have recently faced, a
reorganization or reduction of their education departments, according
to a new survey by the National Association of State Boards of
Education. A dozen legislatures are considering proposals to abolish
their state school boards, and many more are considering reducing their
boards' authority, the poll found.

Such actions mirror the popular political trends of reducing
government intervention and pushing authority to local officials,
observers say. They add, however, that while in many cases the
governance debate may be about rethinking the role states play in
shaping how schools operate, the impetus to act may prevent sufficient
discussion.

"Much of the furor seems to be political rather than the result of a
thoughtful analysis about what will ultimately work best for America's
students and their families," said Brenda L. Wellburn, the executive
director of N.A.S.B.E.

'Local People Know Best'

But the lawmakers and state leaders pushing the deregulation plans
insist that they see a clear need for a shakedown at the highest levels
of school policymaking.

"Our guiding principle is that local people know what works best in
local schools," said Karen Hughes, the communications director for Gov.
George W. Bush of Texas. The Governor has been encouraging lawmakers to
strip the Texas Education Agency of its ability to regulate
schools.

"It has exceeded its intent and authority by interfering and
meddling," Ms. Hughes said of the state's education department.

Many other officials familiar with state governance structures
argue, however, that the changes being proposed around the country are
coming willy-nilly. The N.A.S.B.E. survey appears to underscore that
contention.

Bills in Georgia, Missouri, Nebraska, and New Hampshire seek to
improve education policymaking by moving from appointed state board
members to elected representatives. In Hawaii and Ohio, meanwhile,
lawmakers have put forth plans to remedy policymaking problems by
making the elected posts into appointed seats.

And while some states are looking at measures to abolish the state
board, lawmakers in Wisconsin, the only state without such a board, are
considering a bill to create one.

A Need for Debate

Observers say all the activity suggests a need for a wide-ranging
debate over the size and shape of state guidance.

"With so much turnover in legislatures and the political leadership
in states, there are a lot of people who don't have a sense of why
things have been set up as they have," said Christopher T. Cross, the
president of the Washington-based Council for Basic Education, who
serves as president of the state board of education in Maryland.

"There is a learning curve on the ideas of citizen input and the
independence of education policymaking that has not really gone very
far yet," he said. "As you look at it, you see the need for a sounding
board and group of people who can be responsive to parents and teachers
and come up with sound policy without being political."

Yet the results of the N.A.S.B.E. survey suggest that political
interests are injecting themselves more and more into the core of the
state policy apparatus and showing little regard for its historical
role.

In North Carolina, officials are planning a massive shake-up of the
education department while cutting its size in half. (See related story
.)

Bills in Georgia and Texas, meanwhile, would reduce the authority of
state school boards in selecting textbooks and assessing students. A
Louisiana commission has recommended that more decisionmaking authority
be concentrated in the governor's office.

"Calling for a reorganization is the quickest way to signal to the
public that something new is happening,"(See education--a body facing a
bill calling for its elimination. "Right now, you see a lot of the
grass-is-greener concept at work out there."

Lead or Follow?

In an effort to spur what it considers a more constructive dialogue,
N.A.S.B.E. recently created a study group on school governance to delve
into the issues of the state role in education. Chaired by Mr. Brown,
an education professor at the University of St. Thomas in St. Paul, the
group is expected to present its findings late next year.

In the meantime, observers said, it is unlikely that the scrutiny of
state boards and education departments will subside.

Richard L. Thompson, who spent two years as the state superintendent
in Mississippi, said that while he felt the pressure of critics, the
bashing of state regulators has hit an all-time high.

"Maybe there are too many regulations, but a lot of times people in
state education departments want to make sure they are not responsible
for some dollars somewhere being misused," he said. "If we don't
tighten the screws a little tighter, it may lead to trouble, but now we
may have gotten them too tight."

Mr. Thompson, who now works as associate vice president of academic
affairs for the University of North Carolina system, said striking a
balance is a tough job.

"People are really asking right now whether the state's job is to
help push or to get out of the way," he said.

Vol. 14, Issue 24

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.