Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Ussher (2nd review)

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

First review is here: Uncyclopedia:Pee_Review/Ussher. I didn't do that much to it, I fleshed out the evolution sub-section by about a paragraph and changed the pics. --Mnbvcxz 05:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Humour:

7

I wasn't originally going to review this but since this has been on here for a while I decided to finally do it. I am not too familiar on the subject matter but I will just say what I thought. There are definitely some funny parts I think, but it isn't laugh out loud. It is very dull in many parts and is a bit difficult to read. There are some good parts like in the history the quote was hilarious but maybe its just the subject matter is a bit boring. It is a really good article though despite the topic, and I think its at its max potential.

Concept:

5

The concept is really what I think hurt this thing. There aren't many ways to really go with this. The concept is what it is and there are many better choices. Despite that, it was a bit funny for an article I started reading expecting to be very bored.

Prose and formatting:

10

The prose was very strong and I saw absolutely no errors. The article itself is very strong is well presented. No changes should be made here.

Images:

7

There are three. All are pretty good, nothing to go into hysterics about but they do help tell what you are saying in a way. They fit well for the article too and keep it from being a wall of text. One about gradualism that isn't a cartoon might help.

Miscellaneous:

7

Averaged

Final Score:

36

I personally found this to be kinda boring, but I don't think there was much you could've done to make it better. Lots of your other stuff is way funnier so it is no doubt the topic's fault. It is such a good score because of how it is presented. Besides that good luck!

I would probably agree with your review. The article is at its maximum potential, and it still is a hair on the boring side. I did change the last image, the cartoon was a little off for the tone. My only issue would be that your concept score was probably low, but it was offset by a high formatting score. I would have probably given it 7-8 concept, 7-8 formatting.--Mnbvcxz 08:02, 15 January 2009 (UTC)