Sunday, July 30, 2017

As a non-Hollywood-patronizer, who has nonetheless been forced by fellow test subjects to join in the yearly fare, I write that if I were going to prompt some gullible fools into believing that races needed to be again taken into account, but only certain of those races, I would produce, in close proximity to each other, Django Unchained and Hacksaw Ridge and Dunkirk. Not so long before Django Unchained, we had Shaft, where Nu Euro and African relations were lampooned with traces more authenticity. Django Unchained went farther in the ridiculous demonizing of the idiot Christians who bought and bred and attempted to forcibly acculturize Africans, producing increasing levels of counter-reaction from the people being so degraded. Not so long before Hacksaw Ridge, we had Pearl Harbor. Like Hacksaw Ridge, it was an awfully fabricated Norman Rockwell-ish backstory justifying coming together to invaded Asia and murder the Japanese who had refused to bind their currencies to the central banks, though Hacksaw Ridge presented an almost wholly-white image of the positivity of Japanese mass murder, whereas Pearl Harbor used a token black to make the "interracial buddies murdering non-bankers" more appealing to earlier Nu Euro audiences.

Dunkirk adopts the model of employing defensive reactions to further a political agenda, which we have often discussed in relation to the 2016 presidential show being an evolution of tobacco campaigns (see A Short Chronology of Reverse Psychology in Recent Advertising). In real "Dunkirk battle as we know it in the 21st century," a bunch of traitorous cuckolds from Britain had set out to invade France and Germany for daring to establish anti-bank governments. Hoping to use Germany's retaking of the Gaza Strip occupied territories in parts of the Sudetenland and Poland to bring it in compliance with bank policy, and begin importing Soviets and rapefugees, Britain crossed the channel and invaded, got its ass handed to it, refused peace offers, bombed civilians, continued to refuse peace offers, then called itself heroic for boating its invaders out of France after the mixed French and German armies had successfully defended the continent from attack. As we all know, Germany should have approached the situation realistically, exterminated the invading army, and countered civilian bombing with civilian bombing in 1939, rather than years later. Instead, Germany and, later, France, followed the course of asking for cessation of attacks and the fixing of old boundaries and the like, and most importantly for the Dunkirk discussion, permitting the British scum to take a long time running home to hide in their cupboards under the stairs. Through banking connections in the U.S., Britain was able to re-launch the invasion, divide up Germany between NATO and the Soviets, ship in Algerians to rape their way across central Europe, and eventually to begin openly importing refugees without uniforms. The little prince harrys couldn't get their hands on German women until their court financiers had asked Roosevelt's court financiers to blockade Japan enough to justify American men suddenly invading Europe.

All this, today's "race realists" and "nationalists" are supposed to understand, with the exception of most Nu Euro nationalists having a secret affection for inbred British royalty, tea ceremonies, bank-noble celebritization, and hunting parties where the queers with the brown suits and the rifles can't hike or carry their gear on their own so they hire 4 young Irish servants to do it, then ride a coach back home afterward while the Irish clean and repair their guns, then clean and dress and cook and serve them "their" foxes and ducks. Still, Nu Euros sort of think that importing Africans to mass-rape European women is wrong. So how to get them to suddenly view the utterly indecent British invasion, and the establishment of the multikult, in a positive light? Easy. Put out a movie glorifying the British queers/traitors who invaded France and Germany to install Merkel and Macron, and then make a bunch of idiotic Nu Euro nationalists support and defend the movie by creating a media stir about how the bastards at Dunkirk weren't "diverse" enough.

Bam! That fast, Hollywood is suddenly the nationalist's friend again. The curs have neither honor nor dignity nor the cranial complexity to comprehend that lack. It's like watching them rebel against Obama by voting for an Ashkenazi TV- and finance-billionaire. They're tweeting, they're buying tickets, they're defending casting choices and set design, and they're gobbling up the chance to defend the entire "world war" globalist banking victory narrative of the twentieth century as a good thing. Dozens of millions dead in Europe during the war, in what, only months ago, they were calling an unfortunate "brothers war" in response to the suggestion that we fight Putin's oligarchs on behalf of Hillary. That's how stupid, how manipulable Nu Euros are. Got a jar of rotten cookies that no one else will eat? Bar the pantry door, tell them, "It's too good, I'm saving it for later for my special treat," then pretend to look the other way and they will gobble it down in five seconds flat--while believing that they did it on their own, that they are free and rebellious, and that it really did taste good. Eating shit is something we all have to do in this world, but no other group does it with such pride; such enthusiasm.

How many Chinese did Mao exterminate after the bankers used the idiots in Europe and America to bomb Asia into submission? How many died in Russia, in Africa, in France, in Spain, America, all across the world, as part of the hideously mutated banking pile-on engineered to mandate the Balfour Declaration, make the U.S. currency the world standard, and setup the NATO v. USSR twentieth century?

If you believe in the banking version of history, those deaths are unavoidable celebrations in service of ultimate financial justice, and you might as well demand a more diverse story. If you pretend to understand that the politicians and their teevees are sort of lying, though, it's dreadfully shameful that such a simple ruse would get you.

Saturday, July 29, 2017

Semites who like to carve up children's genitals offer a number of public rationalizations. The rationales tend to be part-health, part-tradition, part-appearance. The "tradition" and "appearance" parts are the only genuine components, because mutilating children for appearance's sake is indeed Semitic tradition.

Consider the mutilation traditions: their true purpose is to sexualize pre-pubescents, often at infancy. On a physically mature adult female, for example, the genitals become, during arousal (true to form and history, this occurs whether the arousal is intended/desired or not), flushed with blood, and expand correspondingly. The expansion causes the outer labia to open a bit, akin to a budding flower, and exposes the inner labia and vaginal passage. When Semites mutilate little girls--a tradition they largely abandoned in Europe during the first phase of conquest--what they are doing is cutting away much of the outer labia and relevant skin folds, exposing the vaginal passage and the local veins and capillaries in a crude imitation of arousal. Female genital mutilation, ancient and modern, often also includes sewing up part of the vagina, producing a vaginal entrance that will, on a mature female, make sexual friction "tighter" for the male user. It also tends to involve vivisection of the clitoris and parts of the clitoral hood, which the Yahweh-/Allah believers have tried to reimpose since gaining entry into Europe, perhaps the most recently being the attempt in America, through Kellogg, to introduce using acid on infant clitorises to burn them away and prevent female arousal from corrupting society. Though acid hearkens to more longstanding Semitic techniques in Arabia, modern Semites tend to use sterile blades, rather than acids, to carry on their traditions in an acceptable imitation of western medicine.

Like any body part, the labia can become dirty if uncared for, ergo when confronted by their penchant for sexualizing infants, Semites have traditionally countered with arguments not only of tradition (sic), but of cleanliness, arguing that the removal of "merely peripheral" vulva components leads to cleanliness. Only an idiot would believe this, and in the case of the Nu Euro, enough residual "protect women" instincts prevented the habit from being adopted as Judaism spread into Rome, then all of Europe. When it became clear that Europe would not initially turn over its girls, the Semitic contract could be amended to permit Arabs to continue mutilating girls in Arabia in the meantime.

The issue works the same with male mutilation, wherein physically mature arousal causes the expanding erection to slide the head of the penis past the foreskin and expose the glans to eager adult eyes. Similarly to the feigned sexualization of the female child, infant mutilation with males is intended to simulate erection-arousal glans-exposure. The traditional Jewish ritual of one or more rabbis licking and sucking on a baby's genitals as part of the mutilating process was initially likened to "cleanliness," which was in modernity revised to the claim that removing impure skin protects the sexualized child from infection. Semites in Europe and America still perform fellatio on male infants, while in Arabia, they are able to indulge themselves with both carved sexes.

Again, only a complete and utter idiot, a sick pervert with latent pedophilia, would believe any of these rationalizations for surgically imitating permanent sexual arousal on babies, ergo after Charlemagne, Nu Euros accordingly revised all their medicine to standardize male infant mutilation under the rationale of cleanliness. Thankfully for Europe's hearing, the Jews did not have a sexual fetish for exposed ears, or it is likely that a thousand years of western medicine would decree that ear infections would be reduced by removing erotic sections of the outer ear flap, and cutting away part or all of the cartilage comprising the auricle.

The 2017 design and sale of various sex hormones--drugs that permit elders to LARP as youths, or to rape non-digitally; or, drugs that prevent or redirect maturation--sexual reassignment surgery, and the reduction or expansion of various parts or non-parts--should be seen as part of this longstanding tradition of torturing children for the harmful sexual thrills of dangerously sickened elders. All of the indignation which today's gentiles would feel if, in fifty years, hospitals routinely perform sex-change operations on newborns, should be retroactively applied to the past thousand years of western medicine, to every single physician and assistant and facility who is now continuing it, and to the original treacherous perverts who led the rabbi's armies north. All of those mutilations, to say nothing of the rapes and genocides, are at their feet.

Friday, July 28, 2017

We're here. There are others. The others seem to be here, too. We look at them and understand something of what it means to be here. Others are like us, but not exactly like us. We perceive a connection between their appearance and their behavior; their capabilities. The longer ones may stretch farther. The smaller ones may survive with fewer resources. The bigger ones are, as literally as possible, more directly and more immediately connected to more matter than are the smaller ones. The bigger ones are "heavier." The smaller ones are "lighter."

At first, it is a delight. New things to look at. New things to learn. The bloated ones, and the sinuous ones, may move in ways for which we have respective and contrasting thoughts. Sometimes, ones are too big to manipulate matter in certain ways. A rhinoceros may not slip in between the microscopic openings in bark. It may knock over the tree and split apart the bark and perhaps pierce the bark with its horn across the exact center of the point at which it imagined wanting to penetrate the opening, but it cannot slip through that opening with its entire body and experience the sensation of being smaller than that opening. A bacterium may do so. It may select that exact microscopic opening that the rhinoceros had noticed or imagined and it may enter into it and be inside of the living tree by means of that opening.

Sometimes, ones are too small to manipulate matter in certain ways. A bacterium may not knock over a tree with a single charge. It may enter the tree and propagate itself by the trillions and weaken the trunk and cause the tree to crumble in imitation of a mighty charge, but it may not charge into that tree with its entire body and experience the sensation of being the singular mass that externally leveraged force upon the whole of the previously intact mass of the tree and knock it over. The rhinoceros may do so. It may select the exact tree that irritates it and lean its shoulder onto the tree and it may feel the resistance of the trunk as it leans and rubs and forces the trunk to the ground by means of its own singularly-perceived control over the mass and strength of the body that it can sense in much more direct detail than it can sense the tree or the nearby rock or the cloud formations on the other side of the planet.

It is not fair. There is a correlation between the matter which we are using and the thoughts which we think we have. We become afraid. Thoughts do not instantly, or sometimes ever, affect matter in accordance with the precision of our advancing desires. We thereby learn of our existences: if thought perfectly coordinated with matter, it would be a different existence. It would not be existence as we use the term here. We realize we have some type of relationship, both connected and disconnected, with the matter we see around us. We exchange our matter with the matter in our environment and we see others exchanging their matter with the matter in that same environment, and we see that the exchange affects how we and they not only inhabit matter, but how the thing that makes us special operates. We see that others grow larger and smaller and are born and die and that these processes have a relationship to the matter associated with what we perceive to be their consciousness. We see that we grow larger or smaller or stronger or weaker and, more disturbingly, we see that our opinions and senses of self have changed as a result. Our interests in other material structures change. We become less interested in sugar and more interested in protein, more interested in sugar and less interested in protein, more interested in certain body shapes and less interested in certain body shapes. The taboos of youth cease becoming interesting and the taboos of age cease becoming novel and impossible. We lose our desire for certain kinds of entertainment and replace them with others. We realize that the pure and special selves we have imagined ourselves to be cultivating are not so singular after all. Chance occurrences in the doings of our material selves cause or avoid vast changes in lifestyle and we are pleased by some and displeased by others. We may realize that but for an occurrence our senses of our selves might be very different. We may come to see that our characters and memories are in many ways derivative within boundaries akin to how our fluxing material shape is derivative within boundaries. We may come to see that our perception of where those boundaries are and how expansive or limiting they are is not one which we can fully understand.

It is not fair and it is not right and no one decent should have to put up with it. We try to prove the world wrong by forcing reality to be about our choices and our choices alone. It is not right that I cannot pick my genetic predisposition for muscular development. It is not right that I cannot choose my features to represent the real me as I imagine the real me to be at this time. It is not right that I can work out an hour a day and not ever be or have been as sexy as some binge-drinking person I knew in school who got a doughnut every morning break. It is not fair that I cannot select a different intelligence or age or species or race or sex or body type or whatever else one is supposed to care about here. It is not right that I cannot change my decision about whether or not I live or how I live or how long I live or where I live and I should get to go back and do it all over again.

Fear drives us. We commit to something, to anything, to banish the demons. Some choose the illusion of decree. Nothing is as it seems and nothing is chosen and it has already been decided by something too great to be real. Choices do not exist because choices have already been decreed and in choosing you are merely carrying out the will of a higher being who already made you to make that choice and every other choice.

Fear drives us. Some choose the illusion of choice. We are all completely free spirits who can choose and choose and choose again what we want to be here.

The local mundanities are obvious. Some people defy the idea of existing, and the fear of not existing, by declaring it out of their hands. No one can choose. Maybe God has already chosen. Maybe the Big Bang has already chosen. Since we cannot change what was already omnipotently decreed, there is no pressure. No fear over the choice. Big Weh and Yah Bang already know what you will choose. You are at this moment already known to be a success or a failure. Greater events than you have charted the course.

Some people defy the idea of not being themselves all-choosing. Choose to be born a man, decide you don't like it, complain you didn't choose, then re-choose. No one here can prove you chose. If we pretend your new choice is valid, we can pretend we're not really going to die. Agreeing that we can overcome matter by choice is agreeing that we are immortal. We identify as the living.

These sicknesses are all derivative of the same source. If a girl can be a boy, then a decaying piece of flesh can indeed live forever. Matter contradicts us. Chromosomes, birth-genitals, brain structure: they "disagree" with our "choice." We cannot wish Great Grandma back. We cannot wish the cancer away.

Western liberalism wishes otherwise. We pretend that "choice" means, in fact, everything. An invisible man has fixed it all so long as we choose to believe that it will be fixed. We can wish Great Grandma back if we believe we can. We can meet her again in a land without cancer because our choices are so strong. If we follow certain scruples, anything is possible. We can hurt choirboys or rim on grindr for fifteen years and then confess and by so doing gain the power to choose good things forever. Our choices are majestic. How we love to enshrine our "choices." We can choose to be saved like we can choose to be a manwoman or an antiracist.

In our throes of ecstasy, we convince ourselves that we have the power. Africans are as book-smart as everybody else. Damn the statistics and full speed ahead! We believe because we must. If African bodies and brains exert a large influence over African test scores, then perhaps our own personalities are similarly bounded. We really are going to die! Nu Euros hate the idea of losing their rabbinical universalism. Whatever form it takes, it is there, comforting them that their choices are, in some vast cosmic way, sanctioned. Powerful. I choose to be alive! It is my choice to accept this glorious gift to which I am, by virtue of choice, entitled!

We see many Nu Euros incredibly passionate about the choices of physical denial. This is really trying to "take back" a chess move, in a way, given the choices inherent in material structure, but forget about that at the moment. Pretend that people do not choose their material arrangements and that is instead done for them by Big Yin Weh and Yah Yang Bang, the overgood evilsome hermaphroditic torture twins of eternity. Focus only on the "being here right now" part. Some people express their fear of death by denying that biology has anything to do with behavior. That is their own jihad. They save themselves by hoping that mass denial of molecular structure can transcend the death they see occurring as a result of molecular structure. God bless them their attempt, those infants of this kind of conscious existence. They're scared, and so they do it. Somewhere in time, we've all been there. Getting upset at them is like asking a dog not to breathe.

Biological reality. Facts assail some. Self-serving, but nonetheless, facts. White people arranged all of the stuff we think of as interesting and valuable. Even the ones who didn't create it are members by virtue of genetic proximity and bone marrow compatibility. The goodies and the bombies and the more visually-labor-intensive buildings and the little phones. It was done, it's consistent, yes. Accept it.

Problem with reality. Wherever white people gather, wherever they build buildings and sculpt sculptures and paint paintings and reduce street crime, wherever they design medicine and reduce transaction costs and build social trust and control hypergamy to some extent, they remain inferior. Wherever they go, the results are as unavoidable as Africans needing an MCAT boost to get token MDs to help white people feel like this material world doesn't actually affect the specialness of their selves. The statistics are there, the science is there, and even the few shreds of relatively recent archaeological and genetic evidence are there: Africans just aren't the same. Molecular arrangements really do affect the special selves we believe we have.

Yes, we're going to die. No, we can't wish our way out of it. We can feel proud that we figured out, in contrast to many others, that molecular arrangements affect us here.

And that hurts you. If African bodies cause African minds to behave in certain ways, then all bodies, and your body, do the same. Even if you say that you don't mind dying, you fear that the sense of specialness, the you-ness, is really an illusion, because this decaying matter exerts a large degree of control over not only your behavior but your sense of self. The proper drugs can make you disbelieve in your god. You can be drugged or gaslighted into committing any crime you can imagine and many you cannot, perpetually, since birth, and with subtle manipulation you can be left believing it was all your decision, the entire time, it was all really you yourself, special you, who was doing it and choosing to do it. Knowing that, whether inside or outside of an illusion, makes one wonder how much one truly exists, and how much one is merely a by-product of matter. It can be terrifying. We turn our heads sideways. No, no, we don't want the blended mashed broccoli. No, no, it is not that way. Our bodies do not affect us. They were magically and perfectly chosen and the wrongness only happens because we are being tricked and tested to see if we will behave even when we are tortured. But the things we think are us are actually us and are only minimally affected by the material circumstances in which we happen to be.

Our only real defense is the insistent feeling of existence we have; of self, of choice. When choice proves itself less than all powerful, the fear takes us. Can we understand the contradiction, or will we dwell in denying that both choice-here and matter-here affect who we actually are?

That's a tough issue for a lot of people. It's not a complex one--it takes a lot of work to keep people from considering themselves allowed to perceive or admit perceiving it, especially about physical and mental differences--but it's still a tough one. It's just one aspect of accepting the ways in which being in this matter affects one.

That realization alone fails to suffice. The lesson is not learned unless it is learned comprehensively. Negroids engineer less well than Nu Euros. Consistently, across multiple generations, with comparable individual and collective independence and large-group and small-group cohesion and resource supply, often with vastly greater resource supply and easier starting conditions for the Negroids. Matter persists. Transsexuals commit suicide and hate the mutilation of their bodies after their surgeries even with family and social and television and celebrity support and subsidy. Blacks keep shooting people instead of visiting national wilderness areas to appreciate confined archeonature or obtaining and using free STEM degrees to design more efficient microwave ovens. On a larger scale, we all hate the counterfactual material denialism we engage in. To whatever extent we participate in them, we don't believe our own lies.

Problem with reality. Wherever white people gather, wherever they build buildings and sculpt sculptures and paint paintings and reduce street crime, wherever they design medicine and reduce transaction costs and build social trust and control hypergamy, they remain inferior. Their ability to be more creative and more simple-problem-solving does not overcome their limitations. In the material world, Jenome is superior. The Jews can show up in any white society, take control of it, and engineer both their own showy expulsion and their own reaction to and recovery from it. Metaphysically speaking, white people are the dorky math student who is totally smart and nice, and Jews are the huge dumb football player that beats them up every time. All those marble statues and silicon computer chips and lovely granite monuments ain't, as they say, worth shit. That is why human history as far back as we have access to it shows a planet in Jewish control, with alternating numerical surges between various host populations and belief systems. Aryans who spread East left stone graves and monuments and genetic traces but were essentially Mongolized. Aryans who sailed west left stone graves and monuments and genetic traces but were wiped out and essentially Mongolized. Aryans who journeyed south left stone graves and monuments and genetic traces but were wiped out and essentially Negroid-Mongolized. Aryans who stayed put will disperse cremated ashes and leave leaning steel monuments and genetic traces but be wiped out.

The prize of ultimate conquest belongs to the Jews. By all means, squabble and protest. But we invented the rocket engine! But we composed the symphonies and the operas! But we invented all the great original stories and cultures! Whites choose to view themselves as superior, even though they've tried and failed to beat Jews for hundreds of times in a row, only to be serving them even more assiduously than before. We wuz kangz; after all, we built Detroit and we made South Africa bloom! And we believe in the survival of the fittest and look at those backward blacks in their mud huts and rap music and so what if they own all the banks and we pay them a fee for every single thing we ever do we're going to be woke any minute now and then watch out serious this time goys serious!!!

They said at the beginning that they were better and that goys were cattle and that goys were going to be their slaves forever. Like the history of black pioneers in scientific achievement, the history of white pioneers in controlling their own societies since contact is nil. Sure, there were regular empty denunciations of Jewish privilege in medieval Europe, constant #WLM or pro-expulsion riots, but they change things about as much as peace rallies prevent funeral shootings in Chicago. Keep it up, goys. I'll take you seriously once you identify the Jenomic pattern, then send excision teams with DNA kits door-to-door worldwide. But you won't, because you're about as serious as the NAACP taking realistic steps to stop gun violence in our communities by reducing unfair sentences for killers with priors.

The race that builds the prettiest things and is the most inventive and creative is not also the race that is materially superior. You can't have your cake and eat it, too, anymore than you can be a man and a woman. Choose between nastiest, sickest, most self-loathing material selfishness, or the ability to perceive and have an interest in higher things. The doppleganger hosts have made their terrible choice, and so have the rest of us.

How seemingly ironic it is that we cannot understand the true failings of Nu Euros, or "whites," without first traversing the path that, deceptively, seems to at first be the most pro-white. The fearful inability to recognize that African material coding establishes certain average parameters reveals itself to be a protective measure designed to safeguard the Nu Euro from recognizing that his own material coding establishes its own average parameters, which are inferior in effect to those victoriously suffered by Jenomics. Perhaps it is the race-blind "progressive" whose idiocy is less profound, for she fairly applies her wishfully stupid philosophy across all peoples, so committed to the idea of negating material occurrences that she clings to the purity of her faith in defiance of all possible evidence to the contrary. The "traditionalist," by contrast, bears an uglier infection, wherein the bulk of the evidence is ignored, yet the ability to view and analyze the evidence is claimed.

Modern Africans have building and provisioning skills comparable to the Chinese of 1,000 B.C.? Clear evidence of African inferiority, they say. Nu Euros have lost every society they've ever built since 1,000 B.C. to the Jews? The Nu Euro's response tends to be, CHEATERS CHEATERS UNFAIR PARASITES, alongside the assumption--often explicitly stated--that Nu Euros, like African American slaves, "built this world."

Many a tome and screed have been written about the vivisection of Nu Euro societies by the Jews. Many source from the more obviously-stupefying perspective of Rabbi-worship being dissected by Jews, far fewer from the less-stupefying perspective of Nu Euros as the original, relatively guilt-free pagan peoples who were unfairly tricked into worshiping a newer Jewish god. In either case, the successive and ongoing defeats of the weaker peoples paints a picture as obvious as that painted by African American gun violence: whites are the weaker society. They are, pursuant to their adopted rules of random evolution (similarly faulty to their adopted rules of Christianity, but its correctness is not here the subject), the less capable species (or "sub-species," if you prefer). Ergo the game is over. Decomposition is occurring and cannot be stopped. Bodies on this planet will be adjusted in correspondence to Jenomic desires. Perceptive abilities, emotional intelligence, and even projective intelligence will all be soothingly reduced under a morphinish dose of mass society, producing a pliable patient ready to end.

Thursday, July 27, 2017

Jarigold Taylorstein recently wrote to let me know that I had accurately portrayed his Murray/Rothbard online bookstore in my January post New Racism, Old Correctness, and Intergenerational Rebellions. I had written Taylorstein recently in regards to my continuing suggestions that the "alt-right" was, like Christian Zionism, a means of using societal conflict between Europeans and Africans, or Europeans and Mongoloids, to frighten Europeans into acting against their own interests, specifically by venerating Jews as the farseeing Chosen people who adopted modern border walls and genetic-testing-based citizenship before permitting America and Europe to do so. Although I had, in January, accused Jarigold of being a successor house-negro/shabbos-goy to Charles Murray, in the sense of his being the gentile frontman for the Israeli financiers who made it again acceptable to discuss racial differences in IQ (Charles Murray was the shabbos goy who put his name on Herrstein's Bell Curve research), I wanted to ensure that I had not made an error. While other Mossad assets, such as Jerry "Richard" Silverspence, are slated for state congressional seats, Taylorstein's age means that he may instead receive only pecuniary awards, and retire as a respectable commentator in a "think tank," rather than as a politician who becomes a regional household name.

Taylorstein was kind enough to direct his moderators to vindicate me as follows:

(The context of the response was the angry mewling of some of Taylorstein's kittenish readership that, if Trump didn't watch out and start keeping his campaign promises, he would regret it, because Taylorstein's kittens might actually--brace yourself--might actually vote for a different candidate in 2020's presidential selection.)

Not one to shrink from a challenge, Taylorstein was brave enough to order this censoring only hours before having his ad-men recycle numerous tweets against censorship at Auburn and Berkeley. This was, of course, a righteous condemnation of the methods of "the left," also known as "liberals," who, according to Taylorstein's subordinates as well as his handlers, are destroying western civilization through the pathological altruism they lavish upon violent Mexicans, Muslims, and Somalians. And occasionally upon Chinese, Amerindians, Venezuelans, feminists, transsexuals, and all other identifiable sub-groups except for one perfect subgroup who is beyond reproach.

Like satellite photos of smokeless ovens at Dachau, my putting this on the internet is systematically irrelevant; the depth is not present for any of this to change anything. I fantasize less about "the alt-right" having sufficient emotional sturdiness to realize their triumphant new racism is another partially-correct Jewish scam than I do about "the progressive left" having sufficient emotional sturdiness to realize that the Fed and capitalism and imperialism are also partially-correct Jewish scams. To mix metaphors, those trains have sailed. The domesticating has been done; there is no material escape. Rather, I'd like to take this moment to remember, again, all those who refused to participate any longer. Such honest philosophizing, such willingness to be humane in the truest sense of the word--making a stand for the future rather than just learning to adapt to ever-more-progressive slavery--is heartening. It's disgusting, too; disgusting, and wrong, and flawed. But it's at least a tiny step in the right direction, like making your first-ever minimum payment on the loans that are too impossibly big to ever actually pay back.

The tax farmer of today is, like the soldier of today, in large part, so far removed from the reality, the viscerality, of the task at hand, that we might as well not be here at all learning these things physically. Like a soldier playing air-conditioned mortal playstation, launching drones at children, the I.R.S. agent is now far removed from the effects of his arcane faux-actions. Tax farmers once had to hire thugs personally, and appear onsite when it was time to club a family out of their home so that the king could court a chinless cousin or add to his fingers some rubies cut in the new style. Now, they pass e-mails to people who pass e-mails to people who pass paperwork to the county that sends the most junior sheriffs--some poor fools who don't even understand what they're doing--to jail and repossess. The need to visibly present oneself as a cowardly thief is gone; so, too, flees the ability of the vast majority of people to understand that any thieving is actually being done.

It's rather a Pandora's box, where we are now: the horrible effects of these comforts, like those of flawless liposuction, will scar so many characters that it will become impossible to build a society on Terra where matters the willpower to accomplish something, rather than only to purchase it on credit.

In 2008, as in 2000 and 1992 et al., America's cowards "compromised" by voting for an evil candidate--a Zionist warmonger who had no intention of stopping humanitarian imperial warfare or shutting down the Fed--and rationalized it as being a "lesser evil" and therefore, despite being wholly evil, a "pragmatic" step towards a brighter future. At the time, I did not ever, even once, call them "faggots" or "pussies," because so many of Obama's supporters were feminists, LGBTQ community members, or allies of said groups, and viewed the employment of such insults as a faux pas. I think I called them "hypocritical fools," "murderers," "cowards," or something along those lines. Trump's supporters, though, are by and large quite comfortable with more basic personal evaluations, and therefore it is not at all inappropriate, nor inaccurate, to call them faggots and pussies in the most pejorative of senses. The allusion to bending over and/or spreading one's legs, shamelessly prostituting one's body and one's people and one's soul to take another eight years for Israel, in exchange for a few token domestic policy adjustments, makes those insults as apt as it does for Obama's supporters, and, unlike Obama's supporters, Trump's supporters are less comfortable with their own willingness to be dominated, so identifying them as the willing bottoms that they are could have more of a productive effect on their future self-demeaning and enabling.

Sunday, July 23, 2017

Bases covered. You don't even have to compromise your standards in your daily mass thought. You don't agree with every writer in the paper, but that one columnist who really speaks to you makes the purchase worthwhile. You therefore benefit all the columnists, and, to a greater extent, the powers behind the paper.

The Jewish activist Ibn al-Ryshar is no longer pretending to be "white" in the "white" sense; he's now come out as "Armenian," like how Nicholas Nassim Talmud has sold himself as a "Levantine Christian" to equal effect. Earlier organizations and commentators designed to attack white women and discourage white families and white reproduction were solidly anti-female and non-racial. Primarily Jewish in origination, and using modern-high-school-level essays about paying drink and door surcharges for a chance to meet hateful women for sterile sex, the men's rights collective morphed into a piper leading its wayward children to Trump, and then on to a vaguely anti-black, anti-indio web of racial theorists who use "HBD" to appear to evolve alongside the self-perceived maturity of their audience. Dick-pills and mail-order brides are slowly phased out in favor of crime statistics; critiques of their feminist co-bloggers are replaced with critiques of their female co-politicians. As older readers lose the ability to maintain erections, and gain a corresponding appreciation for vicarious living through mass culture, links start to feed them toward more expressly political and cultural sites, like youngsters giving up Hustler for Newsweek. Start out hating Jessica Valenti, move on to hating Angela Merkel, and transition from buyer of steroid creams to attender of annual white nationalist conferences.

So fast, it all changes. Ibn al-Ryshar, author of Rape Polish Girls, begins hosting articles (completely written by a staff of not-him people) about how awful it is that Eastern European traitor-states are letting Africans violate Western European pussy. While still coordinating with his ethnic counterparts in other aspects of show business, al-Ryshar plays up the traditionalist side of the Ye Olde market. If you like the idea of screen-fawning over Judaized western kings and courts, and love it when virgin blondes give it all up to hypermasculine Muslim warlords, you watch Game of Thrones to gush over it and you read early Roosh; if you like the idea of screen-fawning over Judaized western kings and courts, but don't love it when virgin blondes give it all up to hypermasculine Muslim warlords, you watch Game of Thrones to critique it and you read later Roosh. The chameleonish nature of these necessarily in-crypsis organizations produces comparatively faster switchabouts.

2015: Admire black masculinity. Use it to resist crazy white women.

2017: Deplore uncivilized blacks. Use it to embrace white families.

One year, black men have the "T" levels needed to show stupid stuck-up club bitches how to take the cock and respect male authority; a year later, white men need to remember their traditional patriarchs and drive out the invaders, not get their civilizations dragged down by negro crime, and wake up to the problem already.

When these changes were ten years apart, it was extremely lamentable; a mere generation apart, with the new sock puppets the heirs to the ones who had said the contradictory things, it was still quite embarrassing. A hundred years, a thousand--still pitiful; still highly indicative of stupidity. Yet understandable, given how long Nu Euros think a thousand years is. Now, though, these juxtapositions happen with such efficiency that there is no need to feign a gradual shift. No need to establish a new marketable persona through which to deliver the inverted message; no need to create false-flags in the interlude. The dutiful Zionism of Ann Coulter and Donald Trump is personally-consistent and career-consistent, though they've at least sorta spread it out a few years from inception to revised nationalism. The horde of agents now disseminating incompletely correct anti-Muslim, anti-Afro propaganda is, quite literally, the exact same personas who were, but single digits of years ago, encouraging white incels to learn how to bang thots by adopting MLK-BLVD-style confidence rather than STEM-degree-style confidence.

They "even" turned MacDonald, purportedly the most specific, evidence-based, intellectual analyzer of Boas & Freud & Frankfurt. The Nu Euro's crippling failure is evident throughout: the great masses of them are so empty inside that the thought of "allies" causes them to immediately embrace yesterday's enemy. So long as they have a pacifier to suck and a stuffed animal to hug, they feel they are making pragmatic progress--vote for a Zionist warmonger to protect themselves from a climate-fraud fag, then vote for a high yellow queer to protect themselves from a doddering malignant Zionist who might, in theory, kill Arabs at a slightly faster rate. The "right" among them will come together as a cowardly bandwagon to join ISIS men in shaming their own women, then swiftly demand that Muslims leave their countries and stop hurting their women, then write long articles on how all their problems originate from Jewish "cultural marxism"...and then, only a few tweets later, they're exulting in the possibility of allying with the Jewish "right" to protect themselves from the subversion to which they were just accusing the Jewish right of subjecting them. It was only a month ago, perhaps a week ago, perhaps a single tweet from a different account ago, that they were viewing blue stars of David superimposed over the entire ownership and managerial/editorial staff of CNN. In theory, they understand and have spent years analyzing the methods whereby Jews control their institutions and make them worship false leaders in crypsis, but even if they're not worshiping BDSM rabbi, they're ready for God Emperor Trump to maybe slightly theoretically reduce further Hispanic invasion while legitimizing all post-1965 Hispanic rapes. Are they that dumb? Are they that flighty? Are they that incapable of remembering what they said they understood only five minutes, five years, five lifetimes ago?

Yes, yes, and yes again. This is what comes by way of Rome and Charlemagne; this is the best the despondent rapespawn scum can manage. God knows they can still write a javascript or two, maybe send a fuel-burning rocket to a nearby planet in their own solar system inside of only 2,500 years, those children of the stars.

Portlandia serves a useful role, here. Carrie Brownstein (and the other completely totally 100% gentile-like-you producers and writers and actors) do(es) such a good job of whitefacing the goyim who fell for SWPL literally inside the same lifetimes where they watch themselves being mocked on Portlandia. The sacred traditions of genetic-blind spiritual universalism that Nu Euros adopted along with Jesus, they mock not even retroactively, not proactively, but intractively, watching Portlandia while voting for Hillary Clinton. It works either way, since if you join the media in laughing at the idiotic gentiles who carry out the last set of directives, you're simultaneously being the new idiotic gentile who carries out the new set of directives. This is why there can be no consistent nationalism; the Nu Euro exists only as a failure, having already redefined himself wholly as either the pitifully ignorant, subjugated loser to the rabbinical horde, or the gloriously ignorant, luminous sheeple to the literal head rabbi of the entire universe. Leonard Cohen perhaps puts it best, saying, "If thine is the glory, then mine must be the shame." What brilliant, insightful, pitiful, and powerful outgoing commentary from someone who understands both the personal destructiveness of temporal victory, and the degrading mockery of those who cheer the externalized glory without even being part of what it really means.

If whites are so racist, why do muds keep wanting to live in their repressive societies? Turn the knife, you purebred untermensch: you love your Chosen overlords too much to not follow them.

Monday, July 17, 2017

Egypt, 18th Dynasty, 1300s B.C. Caucasoid Egyptians are doing what they do: growing things, keeping records, deleting the past and replacing it with retconned sequels, building elaborate stone tombs, and establishing local nature-based gods that they worship in a regular, communal way, akin to supporting the local football team or attending parent-group meetings. Their comparative plenty, cleanliness, softness, and symmetry prove attractive prizes, ergo they're regularly fighting off Nubians (Negroids; "blacks") from the south and Libyans (Negroids and some Mongoloid-Negroids; "blacks" or "Arabs") from the west, other Caucasoids from the north and northeast, and Mongoloids and mixed Mongoloid-Caucasoids ("Asiatics" or "Semites" or "Levantines") from the east and east-northeast. Egypt is then quite similar to its European contemporaries, in a way, with communal chronology and personally experienced nature-worship expressed through and personified via yellow/brownscale stone instead of gray, and by the Nile instead of by the forest. Storing food and supplies in granaries is of vast importance even without the cold weather that supposedly caused, Diamond-like, Euros and northeast Asians to develop future-time-orientation. Like its short-term counterpart, moderate-time-scale "nurture" theory fails again.

-Because Cheops' daughter can't set the mood all by herself.

Though later historians would be encouraged to speak of Rome, or perhaps Greece, as the first great Nu Euro empire to suddenly and inexplicably fall, 1300s B.C. Egypt stood on a similar precipice, and took similarly-leisurely steps toward its own demise. Over the next several centuries, Egypt's "culture" and "social preferences" were to change. Tomb construction would become more about pillaging and re-using components from older tombs than about designing woeful necropolises which showed respect to the Nu Euro's imaginarily-remembered god-ancestors. Canopic jars would become dummies, not as finely carved nor inhabited by actual fermented viscera, but standing in place as empty mimicries of the burials of the earlier pharaohs, whose own monuments had been stripped down to produce smaller imitations. All this would later be attested by intelligent Jewish scholars and gullible Nu Euro scholars as being due to an unexplained shift in "cultural preferences," or perhaps centurial weather patterns, and nothing more.

It is rather embarrassing to read histories of Egypt from Judaized/Hellenistic Greece onward. One can almost feel upon the page the authors' cognitive processes clenching tightly in refusal to eat the demographic broccoli. Why did Egypt suddenly become unable to "mount expeditions" to protect its southern cities against perpetually aggressive Nubian tribes? Why did Egypt stop producing fine literature and sculpture, and why did the latter-day pharaohs fabricate regional sinecures for their extended foreign relatives in attempts to use intermarriage with various foreign warlords to reduce pillage? Why did even Egypt's innermost cities fall into violent disrepair? As time passes, we forget much of what made the Old Kingdom different from the New.

Modern sociology was largely born from rationalization-attempts like these, whereby scholars are forced to conclude that the destruction of future African or European art, literature, stability, and society, result from the intrinsic organic choices of the inhabitants, who are themselves, genetically speaking, the same inhabitants that they always were. Much Egyptology over the past hundred years has been devoted to attempting to find nonexistent relics from later faux-pharaohs, then rationalizing how a partial settlement of nigh-hypothetical, artless mud-brick scratches indicates that traces of culture were indeed present in usurper dynasties, and that the people of the time had merely decided to adjust their religious practices.

Prior to this stage of the fall, religion remained a largely local affair. The village god, clan god, et cetera, existed in a decidedly Caucasoid way, wherein the existence of superior overgods ("Zeus" or "Ukko" or "Wotan" et cetera) was politely accepted but not spiritually definitive, in the sense that local deities and traditions were not swallowed up by foreign ones. Perhaps this arose due to a genuine belief in personified aspects of nature which happened to provide social cohesion as an unintended by-product, and perhaps due to a savvy understanding of communicating social cohesion via personified nature figures in which no one but children actually believed. In either case--reverent belief or applied practicality--worship was centered, for most people, around the local deity. Family tombs, Ahmose Six-Pack's funeral, cyclical holidays, marriages, births, socializing, donating temporal excesses for overall community well being, et cetera: these functions were accomplished via the symbolic and ritualistic language of the local deity.

Da Bears

The power of the NFL Commissioner is something of which Americans may be aware, but even now, Nu Euros cling to sentimental localism. Target tries to emphasize how much money it gives to YOUR local school, touring bands talk about how great it is to be HERE IN HOBOKEN WHERE THEY KNOW HOW TO ROCK, mega-agribusiness has partnership programs with the local strawberry farmer to set up shop at the farmer's market and talk about how helpful the "seed recycle" program has been for "growers here," and so forth.

The bureaucratic organism mandates this kind of nonsense. It is part of the transition to mass society, where local gods--sociocultural representations of shared awareness of the importance of physical contact in family and community, if you prefer--have to be subordinated to central control. In this, Amun-Ra's coming ascension would be somewhat representative of the struggle between communism and free markets, both in the aspect of repression of the individual's ability to live more independently rather than turn over more personal or local space to ideas and intruders supported by a central government, and as regards turning harvest taxes to the service of centralized policymaking exemplified by the singular god.

Egypt finds itself the waypoint between Africa and Europe, and Asia and Africa. With success comes wealth, and Egypt's agricultural successes, and ability to store food for the long-term produce, as mentioned earlier, inviting prizes. Egypt has to constantly fight off raids to prevent granaries north of the San Ysidro checkpoint from turning into endless budget shortfalls, rolling brownouts, and gang rape.

-Unbeknownst to scholars from approximately 330 B.C. until at least 2017 C.E., the Congo is one of several thousand-mile-plus long rivers located on the continent of Africa. Its features include, but are not limited to, water, banks, wildlife, flooding, deltas, mud, clay, and vegetation. "The Nile" is certainly a wonderful thing and a wonderful resource, but it has been made out to be so nigh-sentient, and so important in recent histories, because it generated an architectural, record-keeping civilization, whereas all of the other rivers in Africa, even in much more moist, lush, habitable areas, failed to do so.

Obsessed with building monuments to the magical ancestors it is sure it has, Egypt makes mistakes: crafty administrators in nearby regions offer genetic alliances to help Egypt weather its troubles, of which troubles the mediators possess an uncannily detailed knowledge. Many Egyptian pharaohs, princes, wealthy families, and many more of its high priests and other officials, have fallen prey to half-Egyptian honeypots offered by trading soothsayers from among the nations to the east. The offspring of these honeypots jostle for power, supported by their genetic kindred in the priestly bureaucracy. It works, and Egyptian pharaohs begin to increase foreign settlement. They welcome cheap labor, mercenary service, and the "overlooked" guests who provide the ruling traitors a power base independent of the communities which created said traitors. The enemies Egypt had held off for so long ultimately conquer the territory so thoroughly that scholars a thousand years later call the invaders "Egyptians."

Revised Ra

Ergo Egypt, 18th Dynasty, 1300s B.C. Many years into the above-discussed process, the pharaoh Amenhotep IV changes his name to Akhenaten, establishes a paradisical new city Akhetaten (sic), and decrees paganism ended by outlawing the authority of local teams and insisting on a single commissioning body to standardize the rules for nationwide boxing. (Waaah, waaah, no kicking, no scary knees nor elbows, no sustained clinching, and knocking me on the ground is not allowed!) The artifice of religion grows more extreme. Akhenaten potentially conceives of himself as the sun/son messenger/prophet of a singular multifaceted god, in which god is both the creator of the sun and the sun itself. When Akhenaten dies, everyone returns to local worship and defaces Akhenaten's stuff, but with a bend sinister toward monotheism: the sun god, Ra ("Amun-Ra"), becomes considered a more separate, all-powerful deity, from whom all other djinn, saints, angels, and popes emanated. This necessitated a different, more personal style of creation story, wherein Ra became the ultimate libertarian ideal: the self-generating god, no longer an aspect of nature (the nearest star) but a personified manifestation of singularity; a divine administrator to whom one could appeal for every aspect of life, rather than
solely or primarily sun-related ones.

Why pray to the rain god for rain and the local god for healing when Ra can handle it all with one stop? Why go to the grocer's and then the hardware dude and then the tire place when you can get it all done at Walmart for one low price? Along with this philosophical shift came the necessary horsemen of bureaucratic headship, where Ra was both cosmically and minutely important, keeping all order in the universe yet still available for a thousand people to simultaneously ask for him to help their baseball team beat the baseball team for which a different thousand people the next city over were also at that time requesting victory. Correspondingly, grocers and librarians and housewares aisle-attendants stopped understanding their trades as much as they had before. Everything came from China, instructions on the box, uhh lemme see if my manager knows if it's okay to do that with it. We ad match.

A thousand years go by, slowly dominated by this new conception of a hypocritically personal/impersonal Amun-Ra, and the administrative system of all-access-Ra creates a standardized priestly template subject to its own European Union, whereby holy men no longer need to be from or educated by/in the community they serve, but must instead be educated in centralized Ra-ways and sent out to enforce decrees that benefit a small caste of handlers of the central authority. It was a gradual process, particularly given the technology then available, but it worked. Egypt never recovered, falling to tomb robbery and blending with rapevaders from all directions. Its pharaohs (who'd mostly been dumb wasteful arseholes for the past thousand years anyway, but still) were further delegitimized by the squabbles between their offspring, many or most of whom were now delivered via Semitic or Nubian concubines acquired from treaties with various clever "Asiatics."

Enter Yahweh

Alexander the Great's reconquista of Egypt has been misinterpreted here for a very long time, primarily due to the misconception that Egyptians were always a mixed Semitic-Nubian people, and therefore, Alexander was just conquering them because he wanted to be "great." In its present actuality, the massing of a Europeoid-dominated force to drive back the Mongoloid and Negroid invaders who had broken the older states and peoples of the region, retake Egypt, and name a new capital after its nominal commander, should not be viewed as some random, childish act of "pursuing greatness," but rather as evidence that the (genuine) refugees at the time, and their descendants, understood what the region had been and who had built it, and still felt wronged by its loss. Nonetheless, Alexander's attempt to re-establish Europeoid rule failed (as we discussed in La Raza Cósmica), partly due to delusions of benevolent pre-re-integration.

No doubt the mediators who helped coordinate this latest partly-internecine-, partly-race-war had a hand in guiding the young ruler toward the proper course. Alexander of Macedon--one of the offshoot kingdoms created after the splintering of the Middle East in the time of Egypt's collapse--returning to Egypt with an army is presented much as history has been presenting all European attacks against Semites (and vice versa) for a while now, namely as an endless drive to take things just because. In fact, Macedon was a Semite-dominated petty state under regular threat from all sides, caught up in wars machinated by the viziers and priests who had used such strategies to crack Egypt apart to begin with.

Strabo's description of the blended powers involved in the Alexander-derivative capital, and the original layout which itself expressed the patchwork plagiarization of peoples and religions which sparked Alexander's restructuring of the Middle East, is telling:

The city of Alexandria. Its commercial pre-eminence was based on three main harbors: the deep Great Harbor formed by Cape Lochias and Pharos island which was joined to the mainland by the artificial Heptastadium (also an aqueduct) and capable of taking the largest ships: Eunostos Harbor to the west: and the harbor on Lake Mareotis which received cargoes from inland which fed the export trade. The city's streets were designed on a chessboard pattern with the main thoroughfare, 30 meters wide, running east-west from the Cnobic Gate to the Gate of the Moon. The main quarters of the city were (from west to east) the Necropolis (famed for its gardens), Rhaktis (the Egyptian area), the Royal Quarter, and the Jewish Quarter.

The great expenses to which Alexander, and his conquered-peoples-embracing, Bureau of Indian Affairs-style resource-draining successors, put forth on behalf of the Europeoid foot-soldiers in order to embrace the heirs of stolen Egypt have been previously discussed. Concomitant with such behavior was, after a literate, architecturally competent protectorate had been established over some of the old territories, the spending of great sums to obtain and gather together all available histories and literature in the known world for the inspection and use of the gentle conquest's financiers. This sudden passion for creating storehouses of learning in what were, to the people who had supposedly decided upon this invasion, foreign lands, is typically explained as being due to the white race's "need for grandeur."

If, however, the results of having collected so many works together in Alexandria at that time period is viewed not with childlike marvel, but in practical terms of someone wishing to learn about what those humans had been up to and how to best manipulate them, the library's collection, archiving, and purging processes make sense. The evil criminal mastermind reads the dossier on the cop he is trying to bribe before knowing whether to send a steamy brunette, kidnap a firstborn, reveal old photographs, have an aging mother evicted from a rent-controlled apartment, et cetera. (When considering the importance of gaining lengthy access to literary sources during the time period in question, we must remember the absence of internets, Adobes, printing presses, and cultural openness with outsiders. For an outsider to gain access to a culture's sacred tales was a decidedly different task than at present.)

Shortly after Alexander's succession was helped apart with doses of greed, honeypotting, and assisted bullshit-believing, Berossus in the early 200s B.C. cranked out a compendium of religious tales. A selfish compiler in his own right, Berossus collected together and edited older myths in the region in a pro-Babylon way. Some of the Semites in the area gained access to this work somehow, along with many other Near Eastern cosmologies and origin stories. These they blended with the Akhenaten conception of the distant-yet-everywhere creator, and the Amun-Ra conceptual overgod expansion begun after Semitic advisers had started helping rearrange Egypt protect itself from Nubians and Libyans, and produced a close copy of the old Near Eastern origin stories, and sequels of the old favorite flood and fire and war stories: sequels in which, as still in 21st century Semitic media, the genetic profiles of the protagonists may change depending on desired agenda and current popularity. In these sequels, a certain subset of Semites, called "Jews," were both the greatest victors of the greatest battles and yet also the perpetually-suffering and unfairly-victimized slaves.

-Isn't it strange how modern scholars simply can't figure out exactly what was in that library, and exactly who destroyed it, or when, or why? We know of many "Bible tales" that were copied blatantly and honorlessly from the work of exterminated peoples, whose records, like Clinton-colleagues, survived countless accidents and indiscretions. Being chiseled into stone, or recorded on animal skins buried in deep dryness, some ancient records survived better than modern flesh-bags with loose lips. It seems to be a series of lucky, rare chances that preserved any Gnostic Gospels until the present day, and those had to survive a span of time several centuries shorter than things which would've been bought out and purged through that earlier north-Egyptian clearinghouse.

(Regarding the constantly inconstant racism of the rearranging Jews who Judaized Near Eastern history in their Pentateuch, consider anew the allusions this one has previously made to Star Trek.Star Trek has always been progressive, but not inherently for itself; rather, it has teased at the edges of what was currently acceptable. Ergo the first, mid-twentieth-century version staffed its officer corps with white-appearing males, permitting a token colored female to serve as the worthless officer responsible for being the captain's secretary, taking his calls, setting his appointments, and communicating with the ship's computer, which could speak by itself anyway. The enemies were modeled after staunch east Asian warriors, reflecting Gene Roddenberry's mixed desire to appeal to Anglo-Germanic TV audiences, yet to express his hatred of the culture that had been allied with Germany and Italy during the recent world war. A token "Japanese" Semitic homosexual, also male, offered what was then acceptable diversity on the bridge crew. The essential spirit of the narrative changed in harmony with not morals, but popular opinion, for it took years to become acceptable to Starfleet to make black males main characters, give women executive leadership positions, and make women combat-ready. None of these ideas were acceptable to the Star Trek writers in the original series, who have demonstrated both directly and via proxy over the decades that their definition of tolerance extends only as far as everyone else was already coming around to. No black homosexual couples serving as captain and XO; no transsexual Muslim admirals chairing the Starfleet officer prep division. Simultaneously, enemies were no longer permitted to be shallow, noxious caricatures of western preconceptions of stubborn samurai following a vulgar honor code.)

-You will die for the Emperor when He decrees it, Hiro, and not an instant before!

(The muddle of "YHVH," which was not much later psalmized as "Yah," was likely intended to be un-specific so that Yah/Rah could incorporate other cultures' myths, and thereby their gods, through plausible connectibility. The early Jewish refusal to consistently name their plagiarized partial clone of YMNRH/Amun-Ra, and their commandment not to talk about fight clubVoldemort the name of God, taken in light of the numerous mystery cults at the time, would have been a cunning way to design a deity meant to soon be adoptable and worshippable in forms complementary to many possible target audiences. This vague novelty, besides making YHVH potentially identical to later European or Arabic figures whom YHVH would replace, also helped cloud over where, exactly, YHVH had appeared. Biblical "scholarship," attempting to fabricate earlier Jewish histories than the one copied from Berossus, has always been aided by the ability to claim that much hypothetical archaeological non-evidence indicated "a potential form of early Yahweh worship." In fact, Jewish and European scholars misinterpreted substantial pre-Christian, pre-Jewish religions in order to trace an older lineage for YHVH. Compounding the deceit are occasional hints that "ancient" Hebrew [i.e., Hebrew of the desired time period, linguistically graphed to claim inheritance from older Semitic languages] may have been dyslexic, and could be read right-to-left, rather than left-to-right, when the occasion calls for letting YHVH claim a more-advantageous ancestry.)

Studying the particular way in which these first Jews plagiarized, with certain little details included or omitted, it's evident that they had used Berossus' compendium to do so. Suggested reading here is Gmirkin, which most publishers and libraries don't want to print or stock. In continuing Jewish tradition regarding YHVH's historical vacuuming, you can buy many speculative and many moral and many historical critiques of early Christianity, hundreds of speculative works about personal faith and denomination-posturing from authors present and recent, while a work citing physical evidence from the time period of the men who wrote down the foundational texts is un-printed and regularly commands over $100 for a used copy. It's a dense scholarly text, with massive citations to many different varieties of the early Near Eastern creation stories that were later plagiarized into the Pentateuch/Torah. Even though the plagiarism itself is obvious when compared to many earlier flood- and god-stories in the region, Gmirkin's work teases out numerous specifics indicating that it was Berossus' compendium the Jews used to fabricate their origins. Gmirkin's Berossus also very politely, without addressing racial issues at all, discusses the fabrication of the "Documentary Hypothesis" that Pentateuchal-believing scholars made the western standard for years, in order to prevent a widespread awareness of Genesis as being not merely fiction, but stolen fiction. The Jews replaced Babylonian heroes with Jewish heroes, unrelated battles with Jewish battles, and Byblos' enemies with Yahweh's enemies--acts which, if approached using the standards Nu Euro scholars applied to other historical works, would have had a colossal effect on the use and acceptability of the European human's adopted "Old Testament."

Given the centuries of scholarly reliance on various unsupported presumptions that the Pentateuch was creatively and/or spiritually written long before it was actually copied, the history of the Jewish peoples publicly available now is fabricated. When the Jews suddenly showed up near the end of productive Egypt, they began claiming thousands of years of history based on their Pentateuch. With the Pentateuch exposed as a barely 2300-year-old lie, the archaeological evidence for Jewry consists of cherry-picking pieces of other societies, particularly Arab ones, apart and claiming, "Oh, some of those were definitely Jews. They were totally ancient."

The Novel Ancients

What defines Jewishness or Judaism? The Israeli government offers its own genetic tests on the subject, which bear little relation to historical Jews, but which are instead designed to filter Ashkenazi and Sephardi groups away from other Jews. More-Europeoid carriers are assigned to condo developments, and less-Europeoid Semitic tribal variants are consigned forever to the status of "Arabs" et al. Sadly, humorously, maybe deservedly, yet still wrongly, the providers of what little archaeological evidence there is--of Semitic peoples living in the Middle East before Yahweh--came from those once-Jews who've been already killed by the IDF. "Exodus" and the (modern) Jews' oft-repeated notions of "being kicked out" and "forced to travel" are meant to explain the lack of archaeological evidence for their existence as any manner of recognizable group. Some people claim that Judaica is expressed as an endless record of prejudice because Jews are neurotic and like to talk about being persecuted. Not so--the histories of the Jewish peoples have to be histories of persecution, because, prior to about 300 B.C., the existence of Jews is purely hypothetical, and can only be speculated about based upon (1) presuming that a given archaeological site was related to a fictional story later recounted in plagiarized Jewish sources, or (2) presuming that a group of sick beggarsdestroying invaders marginalized travelers, mentioned in another society's written records, must've been Jews, based upon anti-Semitic attitudes of a later civilization that actually, unlike the pre-Pentateuchal Jews, left records.

Where, then, did Jenome a.k.a. Yahweh enter Terran history? What established Israel's genetic guidelines for Jewishness, and how come no identifiable society of such a people(s) existed prior to the plagiarization of the Near Eastern myths? Were the Jews such environmentally conscious ancients that they did always exist, but never left any records or artifacts prior to ~300 B.C.? Were they always in Egypt, but only rendered in art in the later dynasties, as foreigners, because of the Egyptians' deliberate attempts to deceive later historians? Were they an unwritten, unspoken sub-group of nigh-Arab Semites who declared their independence in ~300 B.C., then abruptly began producing evidence which distinguished their non-Arab existence in the same manner as other groups? Were they a Semitic tribe that had never previously developed writing or architecture, which happened to catch the attention of a roving interstellar organism that consumes life on a scale of time and matter unfathomable by modern Terran standards?

Whatever the case may be, there is no doubt that many a prestigious university can and will remedy this historical oversight. Indeed, using Islamic jihad to encourage Europeans to re-embrace the Torah, via Christianity, may smooth the process of memorializing biblical tales as historical fact--causing them to be viewed as metaphors of shared cultural history, rather than a co-option of other people's metaphors and/or beliefs. As an idea, the Torah was astoundingly successful. The writing and building cultures of the Middle East, like their later cousins in Europe, discarded their forefathers' histories, accepting instead the Torah's chronology. Even now, with their rocket-ships having disproved the untruth of the Torah--and with archaeological discoveries having been made which the Jews of the time did not anticipate, which discoveries revealed where and when the Torah and the "Jews" actually appeared--Europeans could be easily made to accept that the Jews really did originate thousands and thousands of years ago under a series of desert patriarchs. They can view Moses' discussion with a burning bush as "a metaphor for his coming to terms with his identity," and the parting of the Red Sea as "a stylized description of a great battle of liberation," while still accepting that there really were a composite series of Abram- and Moses-like leaders during the time periods claimed by the Bible. They can accept that Jews really were unfairly imprisoned in Egypt by evil pharaohs (rather than benevolently not executed for encouraging bedouins and Nubians to slaughter the people and raid the granaries/wombs), and that the suddenly-appearing Jews of the 300s-200s B.C. were always there, contributing just as much to the ancient myths of the Near East as other cultures who left behind pre-300 B.C. physical evidence. Like Akhenaten ordering his army to deface the shrines of all local gods, it has been, and will continue to be, quite easy for Terra's current rulers to adjust personal piety as they should desire.

The Yahweh god-concept was as flawed as it was stolen. Any internet atheist now can squeal with glee about the plethora of timelessly immoral, plagiarized, anti-scientific, and self-contradictory claims within the Yahweh works, though modern Terrans, particularly of the atheist variety, are conditioned to associate these issues primarily with Christianity, secondarily with Islam, and only barely, if at all, with Judaism. Yahweh is the only god, but Yahweh is jealous of other gods; the first people created were Adam and Eve, but when their son was going to head out into the world the world was already filled with other long-established peoples who had been themselves predated by long-established giants; all of that stuff. For our purposes here, though, we should consider the way in which Yahweh represented a Jewish attempt to create a centralized bureaucracy of divinity, and a false Jewish past, by consuming not only the myths of the smaller and older peoples and polities of the Middle East, but the recently ascendant overgod of Egypt.

In Yahweh, we see the recycling of the "centralization" concepts that had, a millennia ago, been employed to such great effect in Egypt through the Ra revisions. Centralization is efficient, and not malum in se, but Ra had been part of destroying Europe by encouraging the deferral of thinking, evaluating, security, spirituality, and other concepts to a distant authority. In the chaos caused by Egypt's protracted death, Yahweh was originally intended to become the world's sole god. The co-option of earlier historical concepts into a single product, the promises of all-powerful splendor, and the feigned length of history and survival, were supposed to make everyone envious to become chosen, mutilate their children, violate all prior traditions and social arrangements, and create a Jewish planet. The sudden appearance of the Jews on "the historical stage" was caused by the fall of some Semitic desert-rovers to Jenome; this was originally meant to encompass all under the Yahweh brand. Because Yahweh proved initially unsellable to Terrans in Africa and Europe, though, the concept had to be revised before it could have more of an effect on Terra.

Jesus

Less than 300 years after the proud publication of the Jews' make-believe history, the Jewish would-be Maschiah showed up and, rather than conquering Jerusalem for the Jews, was crucified by the Romans for sedition.

(Teehee, it's cute to think that if you believed the Torah, Bernard Baruch was actually the Maschiah. Although, who really conquered Jerusalem? The first British infantryman to march in across the bones of however many dead Jerusalem-Semites? The sergeant commanding that foot soldier? The lieutenant commanding that sergeant? Not Jews. And when was Jerusalem actually conquered-conquered? Depending on how persecuted they feel at any given time, it's not really conquered until everyone else is dead, or at least everyone in the nameless region which some racists call "Palestine.")

Too open an assault on Europe, that final major attempt at converting people to more quickly become Jenomic; to throw off their societies, mutilate their children, and become illusorily victimized roamers. The next attempt would be a subtler one.

Relevant reading here is Zuesse, which does a good job of breaking down the Saul/Paul story, but which is painfully repetitive, overuses capitalization and italics, blames Saul for Hitler but not Charlemagne et al., and is warm and respectful toward the Torah. If you already know the Saul thing, you probably won't get anything new there. Some pluses, though, are the details Zuesse gets into on circumcision as the dividing issue for converting gentiles, speaking to the ongoing Semitic desire to sexually mutilate all humans, and also, Zuesse mentions the non-religious historical reference to Jesus' execution by Romans, which is very un-internet-atheist in its remembrance (since atheists prefer to believe there never was a rabbi named Jesus).

Like street gangs coming together to control the drug trade, the incidents and ideas associated with the Torah turned certain Semites into Chosen-Semites. Those who were not so chosen, or who did not sign on, but insisted upon an honest identity, would later receive, and are still receiving, a terrible vengeance. For daring to possess a lengthy, archaeologically traceable history complete with artifacts and many original customs, the Arab peoples--actual extant Semites of old, with actual homelands and actual Terran-derivative construction--are, necessarily, doomed.

When we see Jesus as having been engaged in outreach to gentiles, encouraging conversion and circumcision and kosher eating and overthrowing another large Europeoid polity, we recognize him as a sign of the raiders' northering. Egypt had fallen, and Rome was to do the same. During his lifetime and shortly thereafter, Jesus failed to get the Romans to mutilate themselves, defy their leaders, and invite the world. Once Jesus was gone, Saul's retelling of the story into a non-circumcising, pro-imperial, vaguely peaceful and warlike (sic) ideology did the trick. "Obey the chosen" became "we're all chosen, so just obey Yahweh." And this worked. Rome took the Egyptian route, embracing Jenomic centralism/universalism, bringing in financiers and laboring immigrants, mutilating children when they were too young to object, and forming closer partnerships with Saul's counterparts in Turkey.

Like his predecessors who'd worked on Yahweh, Saul liberally mined Egyptian mythology for his revised Jesus story, tossing in hints of paganism, virgins, and rebirth. Much of the Middle Eastern reaction to the idea of the historical Christ narrative involved connecting faith in Christ to much-earlier Egyptian rituals regarding the Hall of the Two Truths, where souls would be judged after death to determine the quality of their afterlife--a recurrent theme in Europeoid-derived philosophies, seen also in its more-commonly-known Greek contemporaries. Early Jenomic myths had attempted to sever integration with the life process by encouraging faith in short-term conquest, which appealed sufficiently to the early Jews, but other Terran groups retained sufficient connection to the perpetual nature of the life process to wholly reject the Torah's declaration of genetic warfare. Ergo the next product, ~300 years later, required some kind of afterlife.

Saul took these elements of older Egyptian religion, which added heavy doses of Caucasoid-generated traditionalism, and then, like a good merchant, connected older tradition with newer, mixing these better-known plot elements with the more recent Ra-esque reforms which emphasized a distant-yet-close god. He combined personal piety with donations to a centralized religious authority that provided regional representation. Consider the proliferation of the national/global banking association in 2017, wherein customers want a familiar logo that appears nationwide or worldwide, the ability to access ATMs while traveling, but also want to visit a local banking branch under the sign of that same banner, and converse with fleshly representations of "Chase Bank" et al. Still, today, academic institutions (and associated employees) are considered worthless without the blessing of the centralized authority via accreditation and tithing; martial arts schools must generally trace their lineages to a more broadly known authority figure via tithing to a series of intermediary modern masters; and, church branches are expected to be similarly accredited to a larger, generally-known mass association that ordinates ritual media and delivering individuals. This process, whether valuable or merely a costly but genuine necessity, is inextricably bound to the re-interpretation of Amun-Ra as an over-god, which had occurred during the earlier stages of Egypt's fall thousands of years ago. The newer, history-less "Maschiah" used by Saul against Rome similarly replaced earlier Caucasoid gods--and all the relevant social-, communal-, environmental-, and genetic-bonding associated therewith--with a singular over-god who had the power to incorporate sellout aspects of local faiths by sainting them, and who similarly had the power to destroy resisting deities forever by naming them "heresy." Even many too-white Christ-faiths met this fate, as we discussed in The Perversion of Christianity.

Saul pre-loaded Christianity with the bureaucracy- and delegation-aspects of later Ra-worship and rabbinical Yahweh-worship. To these more brazenly financial components of the religion, it took Nu Euro survivors over a thousand years to begin to make slight objections. Even in their absence--after a whistleblower revealed that he, too, thought the NSA/IRS had gone too far--Nu Euros consistently wanted and want to return to administrative bloat, proving how excellent was Saul's reading of the Euro mind, wherein churches that insist upon higher membership fees and provide more pomp are far more patronized, and materially rewarded, than others. In addition, whitening post-Nicean Christ-representations helped lesser Europeans trust in this unmarried, childless, infant-cutting rabbi who led a bunch of men through the desert talking about the importance of the Abramic covenant and the providence of giving resources away to foreigners who hit one in the face.

Aspects of Judaism: Distend; Centralize

To make possible the changes to Egypt we've reviewed, the Middle Kingdom had to, in part, begin accepting "Asiatic" traders outside of "market" days, and that is what the traditional, gene-averse archaeological and textual record permits itself to see. Like so many cinematic Christian Württembergs, it appears that the Euros then were seduced by their desire for status-indicators, which, like the predominance of cliches and sequels under generalized entertainment, become necessary under an impersonal, centralized authority. Those minds incapable of dealing autonomously with mass society (those "who do not know each other anymore") draw upon simpler cues, like vehicular status or pictures of vacations.

-The trade in lapis lazuli--which was necessary to permit the Nu Euros to celebrate via enduring statuary their possession of lighter eye coloration than their enemies--became part of the opening of Egypt to the facilitators of trade.

-The foolish Natives sold Manhattan Island Cairo for some flattering glass beads, like so many modern-day Nu Euros trading their online banking passwords to keyloggers for rad cartoon profile pics.

Savvy traders with a longer view of the future were able to trick gullible Egyptian leaders into granting them citizenships and advisory posts, which they used to alter pedagogy and generalize community expectations in a way that would later be conducive to African pharaohs and the lifting of prior defense policies ("immigration restrictions").

(Modern figures of celebrity--Lorde, Lana del Rey, Eminem--emphasize the unknownness of their commonesque roots, speaking to the notion that there are still "localities" with "character" out there somewhere, however horrid those are compared to a safe, loving, and respectable London, Columbia, or Los Angeles upbringing.)

Mayors and town councils, and debates over the school board, today serve something of this fading function, but ever since the mega-worship of Ra became imposed, the distinguishing character of local leadership has been its ability to keep the commoners calm about directives from Rome. The local superintendent of schools, or the priest who counsels his membership about the wisdom of the central authority, is retained, regardless of his adherence to the underlying faith, while he who does otherwise invites central wrath and loses his post. Ergo a superintendent who produces well-read, job-ready graduates without wasting X semesters pumping test scores, is removed, while a superintendent who produces a decade of jobless illiterates with reasonable test scores is rewarded. Alternatively, a priest who talks to everyone about Jesus in a crumbling old dance hall with no HDTVs gradually loses "his" flock to the beautiful new parish across the way with two floors of activity rooms and those four hip dudes who are so good with the younger faithful and who, unbeknownst to the world's idiots, were quietly transferred in from other places for molesting kids. Like failure to promote in civil service, these things pass quietly; most Nu Euros just naturally gravitate toward shinier stuff, don't think too deeply into "retired" or "just moved here" stories, and life goes on. Age can be either help or hindrance in evaluating changing institutions over time; sometimes, older community members can see standards changing, and recognize something of what's going on; other times, they despair over death and loneliness, and embrace the strings of faux-community still dangling from the Columbia balloon.

Killer of Gods

The rise of the supreme Ra proved itself more disrespectful to the over-god Ra, and to the ordinary-god Ra, than any prior attacks on Egypt's mythology or its people. This process, which led to the relegation of Ra--whether as divine being or as metaphorical in-joke-style expression of ethnic bonding--to the status of an either implausible or outdated myth, is mirrored in the use of later god figures whose heavily promoted worship resulted in stripping that god/meme of all its powers. In Christ versus Science, we see one such example of a newer flawed tool replacing an older flawed one, with animosity on either "side."

Regarding the Egypt that we can learn something of in 2017 Terra, we've considered several of the ways that various Semitic groups, Jenomically masterminded, were able to destroy a civilization, and a people, slowly and subtly, by consolidating its gods as first superior, then irrelevant. The demographics involved are common enough: Jenomic carriers, possessed of preternatural coordination and an inexorable sense of purpose, set about over-grooming a vulnerable trait of a target population, then exploited everyday greed, legitimate anger at the offensive impurity of the change, and legitimate anger at the offensive rejection of tradition, to have everyone in the target group fighting and betraying each other. Ironically, by crafting a supreme, centralized Ra, the Jenomic mediators ultimately destroyed Ra, whereas by leaving him as one of many local and/or national deities, he might have survived.

Jenome digests the dying in friendly, local, organic ways--not cremation by advanced fleets of spaceship. To be a yawning maggot, forever hungry, leaves one possessed of appetite but averse to creation. Like intestinal bacteria that begin the process of decomposing dead human bodies, Jenome uses local resources to its ends. This is why we see, in these processes, the repurposing of ideas into useful (as to pestilence and decay) versions of themselves, rather than the arrival of purely new, alien tales.

Nu Euros are permitted, today--even encouraged--to mock the Nicean Bible for its many scientific problems. They are even encouraged to critique aspects of the Pentateuch as being part of a rich tradition of self-glamorizing origin stories that drew upon shared human components. What they are not encouraged to do is specify how the borrowing, plagiarizing, spinning, and/or metaphorizing of many other origin stories had, in the Jewish version, (1) a specifically sub-genetic component in their fabrication and use, which (2) falsified history not only so as to adopt the plot styles as their own, but so as to invalidate all other gods and traditions, (3) feign being the original source for the material, rather than, as the other origin stories had, interconnecting gods and heroes with older shared traditions, and (4) use the stories as evidence for having always been Terran. Even in the earliest stages of Jenomic infection, Terran writers would refer to any group of ancient desert-wanderers at-hand as "Jews of antiquity," when the said group had been so claimed as ancestors by contemporary Jews.

The genetic argument made in service of anti-Semitism, or anti-Judaism-specifically, is incomplete. The story-robbers who abruptly seized a historical identity and became called "Jews" may have been successful roving Semitic pillagers prior to available recorded history, but at a certain point, some of them became very different. And this difference has persisted, throughout many and varied genetic forms, proving to be an unduly resistant characteristic despite any potential intermix or temporal motivation.

At any necessary phase of history, "the" Jews have been able to cast aside many, even a majority, of their kindred, and be complicit or active in the slaughter thereof of people who were, previously, "Jewish." The destruction of the Ottoman Empire and the invasion of Palestine are two recent examples, whereby a genetic group that had the power to import its members into the most prosperous places in the world instead slaughtered parts of itself. This one has touched on this phenomenon before, in Immibortion Policy 1:

Because many Semites native or partially-native to the region physically resemble each other, the risk of fresh colonists (Jews) being confused with prior inhabitants (Druze, Arabs, various more-or-less Asiatic/African Semites--like the modern Holocaust story, even the dramatic official tally of "victims" is not limited strictly to Palestinian Arabs), it is necessary for Jewish settlers to distinguish themselves through costuming (modern western), grooming (again, more akin to modern western, to provide a suitable contrast with Palestinian Arabs), speech patterns, et cetera, lest they be mistaken at a distance for Arabs. It isn't a simple matter of skin tone or facial bone structure; Israelis are good at recognizing the subtleties of their own, but non-maternal Jewish Semites, e.g. rapespawn from 1948 onward, are considered rightless Arabs, eligible for random military execution, even if they are, per modern Terran science, equally genetically Jewish. Specifically, this means that if a Jewish Semitic woman purposefully bears the child of a Europeoid man, the child will be genetically Semitic and legally Jewish, whereas if a Jewish man rapes an Arab woman--say, the frequent IDF-on-teenage-girl by force or in exchange for calories or water--and the recipient becomes pregnant, the resulting child will not be eligible for citizenship, because of an inadequately registered genetic line.

If you go to certain parts of Israel, you can see this: under the non-western hairstyles, clothing, and other less pleasant effects of Zionism, the non-citizen genetic legacy of the area, rapespawn and alternately hapless, could otherwise pass for Jewish. Consider, e.g., the costuming of the royals of the Jewish House of Saud, who through careful later marriage and elaborate costuming, make themselves out to be merely partly Jewish-Semitic (as well as the obligatory "when in Rome" Arab-Semitic admixture). This isn't meant as an insult nor a compliment to the non-citizen peoples of the various untouchable "Arab" ghettos of Israel, but as an example of the visual quandary faced by the IDF. How many Jews are killed without anyone knowing, or wanting to know, that they were genetically Jews, we'll never know. A Lovecraftian--or, perhaps better put, Kafkaesque--situation exists in Israel, for those Jews who are quietly never tested due to improper or informal parentage, and whose later deaths are recorded as due to the corpse's supposed act of Arab terrorism. This is, incidentally, the end-goal of Jewish-influenced nationalisms for other peoples as well: a horrorscape of shifting states of belonging and not-belonging, where government willingness to analyze or process tests, or to make or maintain records, is a permission that can be withdrawn wherever convenient. Gaza is a holocaust of Arabs, but also one of Jews, though history must necessarily forget that, during this period, the IDF was also executing genetic Jews. Not only must it bleed foreign hosts; Israel eats itself to survive.

Although the recent exterminations in Armenia and Palestine are easier to contemplate, this process recurs in Jewish history, wherever it becomes more advantageous for the Jenomic project to continue using a different kind of medium. Many of the North African and Middle Eastern states who conducted purges of Jews, or who coordinated with the Nicean/Roman church and the European crusader-states to have Jews slaughtered in Europe or en route to crusade, were controlled by or financed by other Jews. In an interesting turn of events foreshadowing the successive betrayal of many Jews later, early Jews who sneaked into Memphis to worship the golden Apis Bull were themselves pilloried and thrown to the Egyptians, then condemned in the Torah itself. Their betrayal by their kinsmen was later called justified, as a mere act of God; their work integrating with the local Egyptian religion was scorned, and they were dropped from history. In an alternate timeline, where Apis Bull outshone Ra based on Europeoid preference, those Bull-Jews might have killed off the Yahweh-Jews, and the Catholics would be worshiping feedlot porn rather than crucifixion porn. Exodus 32 would instead read:

When the people saw that Moses was so long in coming down from the mountain, they gathered around Aaron and said, “Come, make us gods who will go before us. As for this fellow Moses who brought us up out of Egypt, we don’t know what has happened to him.”

Aaron answered them, “Take off the gold earrings that your wives, your sons and your daughters are wearing, and bring them to me.” So all the people took off their earrings and brought them to Aaron. He took what they handed him and made it into an idol cast in the shape of a sun, fashioning it with a tool. Then they said, “These are your gods, Israel, who brought you up out of Egypt."
...
When Moses approached the camp and saw the golden disc and the dancing, his anger burned and he threw the tablets out of his hands, breaking them to pieces at the foot of the mountain. And he took the sun-disc the people had made and burned it in the fire; then he ground it to powder, scattered it on the water and made the Israelites drink it

This is not the behavior of a genetic group using kinship links to survive; there is, rather, another, more powerful, more essential factor inside the groups sometimes called "Jews" that is itself interested in pursuing an end, regardless of the "evolutionary success" of whoever, retroactively, becomes called a Jew. The whitish Jews who dominate the world now, and the Han ones who may do so tomorrow, have not and will not stop to preserve the lineages of any genetic likenesses deemed retroactively outdated. Crypto Ashkenazi have brutalized once-Jew "Arabs" to extreme degrees, only to subsequently create a potential world caliphate in which crypto Arabic leaders would later execute the core of the Ashkenazim ruling lines. It's not about the evolutionary survival or success of human-derived genomes. Something else drives the destruction.

What factor this is which influences these thousands of years of behavior does not necessarily need to be an interstellar decomposition agent. We might mundanely contemplate some as-yet undiscovered Terran organism which uses human hosts to survive, and which thrives only in genetic-derived structures possessing certain characteristics. Perhaps this is why the organism doesn't mind sacrificing so many of its once-hosts to the cause.

Inside of a few millennia, dusky, coy flatterers have become pasty, arch-critical software engineers. Negroids, Mongoloids, and Caucasoids (Nu Euros) are still essentially themselves, while the Jenomic carriers have, but for the infection, become something almost entirely different than what they wore before. There is little if any hope of helping a dying world study this impartially and take appropriate action, for even the idealized appropriate genetic response would leave sizable traces, and new rotting godlings would obtain ready worship from the ashen masses. The disparity in intelligence and unity, and the horrid adaptability of the carrier, indicate the superiority of the natural process that is here occurring. This very superiority is, by its nature, attractive to the fearful, and leads them to become envious of the participants in the consumptive process. ("Why can't we have a wall, too?") It grows far darker, for this is only a few millennia in. Yet a few ones, even now and here, will appreciate, and anticipate, the beauty of the overall process. Not in the sense of sniffing luridly about corpses, nor of enjoying ignorant drooling at the expense of learning how to swallow. Rather, in intelligently avoiding the despair that will otherwise lead the self to pursue the path of service as a digestive drone.