ON CRIPPLING APPEASEMENT. 1.

Date: 19 Aug 2007
Comment:
Politics of appeasement has crippled India.
By J.G. Arora
Organiser, New Delhi: August 19, 2007
As per Sir Winston Churchill, "An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last". Though India is being devoured bit by bit every day by its tormentors, India continues to appease them. Poisonous politics of appeasement has crippled India and ravaged its body and soul.
Genocide and eviction of Hindus from Kashmir to be made refugees in their own country; frequent Pak-Bangla sponsored terrorist attacks on security forces, civilians and temples; continuation of Article 370 conferring a special status on Muslim majority Jammu and Kashmir; infiltration of crores of Pak-Bangla nationals into India to create one more Islamic country on Indian soil represent the bitter harvest of this suicidal appeasement.
Long legacy
This hideous policy of appeasement started in 1921 when Mahatma Gandhi and Congress Party's support to Indian Muslims' demand for Khilafat (to install Sultan of Turkey as the Caliph) led to Moplahrebellion in 1921 in Malabar in which thousands of innocent Hindus were massacred by Muslims. And Hindus had nothing to do with British policy towards Turkey.
Sir C. Sankaran Nair (1857-1934), a former judge of Madras High Court has described horrors of Moplah rebellion in his book "Gandhi and Anarchy". But Mahatma Gandhi reportedly described Moplahs as "God fearing," who "are fighting for what they consider as religion, and in a manner they consider as religious."
Persistent appeasement philosophy of Congress culminated in the Muslim League demanding Pakistan for Muslims in March, 1940, and creation of Pakistan in 1947 and eviction of Hindus and Sikhs from present-day Pakistan and Bangladesh. But even after 1947, same doctrine has guided successive Congress governments' actions.
Only a few illustrations of such countless actions are given here. Congress government under Jawaharlal Nehru started "Haj subsidy" for Muslims in 1959 though such subsidy is anti-secular and though none of the 57 Muslim countries pays any such subsidy. And to placate Muslim uproar over Supreme Court'sjudgement in Shah Bano's case, the then Congress government passed the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986; and nullified the saidjudgement.
And the same Congress which had rejected "Communal Award" in 1932 is now spearheading Muslim reservation in government jobs; and is sharing power with Muslim League which had demanded and got Pakistan. Besides, debunking nation's security, after regaining power in 2004, Congress government repealed Prevention of terrorist Activities Act (POTA) the way it had repealed Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) in 1995. Besides, to please pro-Pakistan elements, UPA government is planning to withdraw security forces from Kashmir.
But the most vexatious outcome of this capitulation is the demographic and terrorist invasion of India.
Demographic and terrorist invasion
In their bid to demolish and dismember India, Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence, and its Bangladeshi counterpart are bent upon creating one more Islamic country on Indian soil for which they have illegally sent crores of their nationals into India.
AASU leader Sarbananda Sonowal took the issue of Bangladeshi infiltration to Supreme Court. By its judgement dated July 12, 2005, Supreme Court struck down the Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act, 1983 as unconstitutional; and termed Bangladeshi infiltration as "external aggression" and directed that"the Bangladesh nationals who have illegally crossed the border and have trespassed into Assam or are living in other parts of the country have no legal right of any kind to remain in India and they are liable to be deported."
But instead of deporting the infiltrators, on Feb. 10, 2006, UPA government brought in the Foreigners (Tribunals for Assam) Order to nullify the apex Court'sjudgement. However, on December 5, 2006, Supreme Court quashed this Order also as illegal and unconstitutional, and called for a strict implementation of its earlierjudgement dated July 12, 2005 "so as to ensure that illegal immigrants are sent out of this country."
Shockingly, despite the Supreme Court's clear directions, no infiltrators have been deported by the government. Rather, thanks to UPA government's policy of soft borders, Pak-Bangla nationals are infiltrating into India every day changing the demographic map of various States in the country.
And even before perpetrators of 1993 bomb blasts in Mumbai could be punished, Mumbai faced fresh blasts on July 11, 2006 in trains which claimed about two hundred lives. And these attacks are in the long line of attacks Bharat has suffered since Muhammad bin Qasim's Arab army's attack in 711.
And such attacks continue to hammer India due to government's terrorist-friendly approach.
'Settlement' as against 'appeasement'
Immediately after Muslim League demanded Pakistan for Muslims and exchange of population in March 1940, Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar wrote his book"Thoughts on Pakistan" in which he criticized the Congress policy of 'appeasement' of Muslims, and advocated the policy of 'settlement'. As per Dr. Ambedkar, 'appeasement' sets no limits to the demands of aggressor. 'Settlement' does. Besides, appeasement increases aggressor's aggression. Accordingly, Dr. Ambedkar held that as a 'settlement', creation of Pakistan would end constant appeasement.
Besides, as a 'settlement' of Hindu-Muslim conflict, Dr. Ambedkar suggested that exchange of Hindu-Muslim population must accompany partition of India.
But despite Dr. Ambedkar's counsel against appeasement, Congress kept on pursuing appeasement. In the 1945-46 elections, Muslims voted for the creation of Pakistan. And despite conceding Pakistan in 1947, Congress continues to cling to its policy of appeasement.
A large majority of Indian Muslims who demanded Pakistan for Muslims and exchange of population on creation of Pakistan stayed back in India, and did not go to Pakistan. But with the creation of Pakistan in 1947, it was the permanent settlement of Hindu-Muslim problem in the sub-continent. Accordingly, appeasement must come to an end.
Now or never
Because of its surrender and inaction, India is being taken over by crores of Pak-Bangla infiltrators silently. Besides, countless Pak-Bangla terrorists are stalking all over India to strike at the time and target of their choice.
Since drastic situations demand drastic remedies, all nationalist organizations and individuals must come together and force the government to act as follows:
a. Terrorists must be crushed; not welcomed and embraced. Chanakya Neeti as also Sun-tzu's Art of War, and countless lessons of world history emphasize the crushing of enemies before enemies crush us.
b. Let infiltrators be treated as invaders. And not as vote banks.
c. Let Indian borders be sealed to prevent infiltrators from entering India.
d. Let all Indo-Pak and Indo-Bangla road and rail journeys be discontinued.
e. Let the Supreme Court's judgements be implemented and crores of Pak-Bangla infiltrators be deported. And their daily influx be curbed.
f. And let Pak-Bangla design to destroy India and plant one more Islamic country on Indian soil be defeated.
Here it is relevant to quote Sir Winston Churchill who deprecated the British policy of appeasement of Germany before outbreak of Second World War thus,"Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival."
---------------------------------
000000000