Campaigners working to raise the profile of male victims of family violence have described the New South Wales government's appointment of a feminist organisation to assist male victims "a curious choice."

Yesterday, the Men's Referral Service was appointed by the NSW government to run a pilot service to connect male victims of family violence with specialist, local support worth $13M over 4 years. Mr Greg Andresen, a spokesman for the One in Three Campaign, which advocates for male family violence victims, said the appointment raised a lot of questions which needed answers.

"Males make up roughly one third of victims of family violence, and they need services that are going to understand their unique needs and give them appropriate assistance. Appointing a feminist organisation as the frontline provider without an open tender process, is a curious choice that needs explanation," Mr Andresen said.

Mr Andresen pointed out that the Men's Referral Service, an arm of No To Violence, was established to work with male perpetrators of family violence, not male victims. An examination of the group's website (mrs.org.au) shows their lack of experience in dealing appropriately with male victims.

For example, their website says:

The Men's Referral Service (MRS) provides free, anonymous, and confidential telephone counselling, information, and referrals to men to assist them to take action to stop using violent and controlling behaviour. No To Violence (NTV) is the Victorian state-wide peak body of organisations and individuals working with men to end their violence and abuse against family members.

Mr Andresen pointed out the information the MRS provides "for men" is predicated on men being perpetrators of domestic violence. NTV is on the public record as stating "the need to be cautious in automatically assuming that a man assessed by police or another referring agent as a victim of domestic violence truly is the victim".

Mr Andresen said this was at odds with the 2012 NSW Legislative Council Inquiry that found there was a need for the provision of appropriate services to male family violence victims, which led to the contract in the first place.

"The Inquiry found there was a lack of support for male victims, but we are puzzled how appointing a feminist organisation with no track record of providing appropriate support would be better than appointing one of the male health organisations with considerable expertise in the area.

"A male victim seeking support who reads on a website that he needs to take responsibility for his 'violent and controlling behaviour' is probably not going to have a lot of confidence in ringing that service and asking for help. And if he does call and is assumed responsible for the violence, he may not reach out for help again," Mr Andresen said.

Mr Andresen said he was worried about the epidemic of male suicide in Australia, which was partly a consequence of men being placed in untenable family situations, with little or no support.

"With so many men taking their own lives, the government has an obligation to find them the help they need, especially when family violence is concerned.

"Minister Goward's heart seems to be in the right place, but maybe the government's dollars are not," Mr Andresen said.

The fact there was no open tender and appointing a feminist organisation as a frontline provider confirms that even this modest amount (compared to that which feminist organisations monopolise) 13 million of govt. funding has been co-opted by feminists to blithely force the narrative that males remain the perpetrators of DV,in their language"to assist them(men) to take action to stop using violent and controlling behaviour". What male victim of DV would use a service that has been infiltrated by feminists,therefore designed to further traumatise and alienate men.

In the end, it is not enough just to get angry about the blatant bias and sexism described in this article. Men have to mobilize. Men are indeed slowly waking up all around the world to how their male leaders are discimminating against them and intentionally ignoring their rights as male human beings, but it is happening too slowly. Evolutionary change can take decades and longer. There needs to be a greater groundswell by ordinary, decent, genuine but abused men to galvanise the men's movement into collective action. Numbers of activists need to increase so that the men's movement reaches a critical mass compelling male leaders to start treating vulnerable men as beings with needs and rights, just the same as vulnerable women need help by society. So the men's movement must find that spark that channels their collective anger and sense of injustice into one loud booming voice that will shake the two houses of parliament and the rest of the country. Until that happens, our leaders will continue to exclude ordinary vulnerable men from the help and respect they deserve. A good start will be men helping men to stand up for equal treatment. There are plenty of non-macho sensitve but tough men in Aus who will do a great job in helping men to cope as victims of domestic violence or emotional abuse and all the other areas where men are getting limited help such as PTSD, suicide, divorce, child custody, health, education, incarceration etc. Time for the groundswell to turn into a Tsunami.

In order to carry out our aim of raising public awareness of the existence and needs of male victims of family violence, the One in Three Campaign encourages all media, whether mainstream media, websites, blogs or social media, to widely share our material with attribution. However, use of our material by any third party is not a sign of endorsement or affiliation between that party and One in Three. In order to carry out our aim of working with governments to provide better assistance to those affected by family violence, the One in Three Campaign works actively with all sides of the political spectrum but is unaffiliated with any political party or position.