Every second rape convicted is a foreigner By Lars Fogt Sunday, July 22, 2012

More than half of those who were convicted of rape in 2010 were immigrants or descendants of immigrants. (Foto: Jeppe Bøje Nielsen) (Photo: Jeppe Nielsen Buoy)

Iraqis, Iranians, Turks and Somalis are dramatically overrepresented in rape convictions in Denmark.

More than every second time judges in 2010 took deed men guilty of rape, was the culprit immigrants or descendants of foreigners, official figures from Statistics Denmark.

Exactly was 32 with a Danish background in 2010, convicted of rape against 27 migrants and 7 descendants of immigrants, totaling 34th

Shocked Taking rape sentencing of the last seven years is more than one out of three convicted of rape either immigrant or descendant - exactly means 156 of the 450 rape convicted since 2004 immigrant background.

As immigrants and their descendants accounts for barely ten percent of the Danish population - are thus more than three times as many people with foreign backgrounds who are convicted of rape in relation to the...

Danish police: Immigrant criminals target Danes to make them move out of the (Muslim) area On January 24, 2012 By Nicolai Sennels

Muslims; right to rob non-Muslims has been established since their prophet (always "their", not "the") attracted fighters by allowing booty and rape when attacking non-Muslims. An anonymous Danish police officer now says that "immigrant" criminals are targeting non-Muslims because they want them to leave the area. http://theunitedwest.org/danish-police-immigrant-criminals-target-danes-to-make-them-move-out-of-the-muslim-area/

...and it's "Perfect Specimen and Founder" (the psychotic, murering, pederast, thug, Moo-Ham-Ud) who ALL Muslims are encouraged to "Emulate" in EVERY respect.

It is against Islam to rape Muslim women, but Muhammad actually encouraged the rape of others captured in battle. This hadith provides the context for the Quranic verse (4:24):

"The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives.

" Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers.

"So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Quranic verse: (Sura 4:24) "And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess." (Abu Dawud 2150, also Muslim 3433)

Actually, as the hadith indicates, it wasn't Muhammad, but "Allah the Exalted" who told the men to rape the women in front of their husbands - which is all the more reason not to think of Islam as being the same as other religion.

Note also that the husbands of these unfortunate victims were obviously alive after battle. This is important because it flatly contradicts those apologists who like to argue that the women Muhammad enslaved were widowed and thus unable to fend for themselves. (Even if the apologists were right, what sort of a moral code is it that forces a widow to choose between being raped and starving?)

There are several other episodes in which Muhammad is offered the clear opportunity to disavow raping women - yet he instead offers advice on how to proceed. In one case, his men were reluctant to devalue their new slaves for later resale by getting them pregnant. Muhammad was asked about coitus interruptus in particular:

" "O Allah's Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus?"

"The Prophet said, "Do you really do that? It is better for you not to do it. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence. (Bukhari 34:432)

As indicated, the prophet of Islam did not mind his men raping the women, provided they ejaculated within the bodies of their victims.

As one might imagine, Muhammad's obvious approval of raping women captured in battle and his own personal participation as recorded in many places is of intense inconvenience to the Muslim apologists of our time.

For this reason, some of them attempt to explain away these many episodes and Qur'anic references to sex with captives by pretending that these are cases in which women have fled bad marriages and sought refuge with the Muslims. Some apologists even refer to them as "wives," even though the Qur'an makes a clear distinction between "those whom thy right hand possesses" and true wives (see Sura 33:50).

Beyond the desperation of the 21st century apologist however, there is absolutely nothing in the historical text that supports this rosy revision of Muslim history. The women of the Banu Mustaliq were sold into slavery following their rape:

" "We went out with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi'l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing 'azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah's Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter" (Sahih Muslim 3371)

In fact, female slaves were traded like any other simple commodity by Muhammad and his bad of devoted followers:

" "Then the apostle sent Sa-d b. Zayd al-Ansari, brother of Abdu'l-Ashal with some of the captive women of Banu Qurayza to Najd and he sold them for horses and weapons." (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham/Hisham 693)

Is it Islamic to sell one's wife for horses? Clearly these were not wives!

More importantly, by definition a "captured" woman is not one who is fleeing her husband. She is fleeing her captor (ie. the Muslim slave raider). This hadith describes a typical raid, in which the women and children are captured as they are attempting to flee the attacking Muslims:

"  and then we attacked from all sides and reached their watering-place where a battle was fought. Some of the enemies were killed and some were taken prisoners. I saw a group of persons that consisted of women and children [escaping in the distance]. I was afraid lest they should reach the mountain before me, so I shot an arrow between them and the mountain. When they saw the arrow, they stopped. So I brought them, driving them along (Sahin Muslim 4345)

The Muslim narrator (who happens to be Muhammad's adopted son) sees the women trying to escape (following the massacre of their men) and cuts off their route by shooting an arrow into their path. These aren't women trying to seek refuge with the Muslims. They are trying to avoid capture by the Muslims.

The same hadith goes on to recount that Muhammad personally demanded one of the captured women for his own use:

" I drove them along until I brought them to Abu Bakr who bestowed that girl upon me as a prize. So we arrived in Medina. I had not yet disrobed her when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) met me in the street and said: Give me that girl. (Sahih Muslim 4345)

The prophet of Islam and his companions used war to collect women for personal sexual use and for trading. Unless she was arbitrarily declared as someone's wife, the woman became a sex slave. In no case was her fate tied to anything that she had personally done, nor was she given a choice about her future.

What is fun to see in this mess is that countries that historically have called America racist, are beginning to get a look at how well their countries can handle what America has been dealing with for 250 years.

These countries like England and Sweden had a mostly Caucasian population and they sat back and took the side of the downtrodden minorities. Now they are getting a taste of the real problems, and they don’t have a clue as to how to handle it.

And this is what the Leftists are doing today. They are taking that ideal and allowing in every diseased wastrel from as many Third World countries as possible and signing them up for any and all entitlement programs.

Bankrupt morals and ethics of a nation leads to bankruptcy of its economy.

13
posted on 07/24/2012 10:45:29 AM PDT
by Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.