I just posted a very simple post about Serpent Mound at my site you may be interested in. Please let me know if I’ve misspoken about anything since I strive to strip things down to facts when possible.

Thanks for posting a link to Mr. Provod’s work. I am visit Ohio right now and a friend called me to tell me about serpent mound. I was looking for some real information about the energetic significance of this site. It is obviously of greater worth than narrow visioned archeologists in America can comprehend, brainwashed by a system seeking to keep the true nature of reality, energy and power from the average person. Unwittingly and perhaps through a divine guidance of which your rational mind is graciously blocking your awareness, you have led me to important information and I am truly grateful.

LOL. What makes you think the Great Pyramid couldn’t be duplicated? It would be pointless and a waste of time/money/manpower, since we don’t need another one, but experimental archaeology has shown time and again that the construction methods used on the pyramids were not only feasible but easily done by Egyptians of the day. In fact, many Egyptian murals and texts give illustration and explanation of it.

Serpent Mound boasts an unusual number of lightning strikes, and so I suppose that throws your pseudoscience theory out. At times the whole promontory is so ionized that the hairs on your arm begin to stand up. The ground is highly faulted below because od an ancient meteor strike, and that’s why there’s extraordinary telluric current measured at Serpent Mound. You should research before you write. check out Burke and Halberg, 1995

What you’ve written is complete bunk. What is the evidence that the number of lightening strikes is “unusual?” And, by “unusual,” do you mean it gets more or less, on average, than other places. And by places, do you mean mounds, fields, craters, canyons, ridges or urbanized areas?

There is no “promontory” at the site, since this is a cliff that butts a sea or lake. But, assuming you mean the cliff on-site, what method did you use to measure ionization. Was the rock “ionized” or was the air? Were the ions negative or positive? Are you sure the “hairs standing up on your arm” weren’t simply do to fear of falling of the cliff or anxiety created in your own imagination? What methods did you use to rule these out?

In addition, what was the method by which you measured the telluric current at Serpent Mound? What makes this current more extraordinary than that of other localities? How does it compare, say, to a field 100 miles away with the same geologic strata?

Pseudoscience is so easily defeated and refuted with just smart questions. Burke’s and Halberg’s, Seed of Knowledge, Stone of Plenty, appears to be but one of thousands of crap, crackpot books on pseudoscience.

Thank you for taking the time to counter this pseudo-scientific thinking. It sure is a lot easier to make stuff up than to do real science. It is very difficult to undo the damage of pseudo-science, as the posts above deftly illustrate. Belief is always self-reinforcing, and more so, it seems, when threatened by simple facts.

Reality is NOT individually constructed.
Individuated reality is often delusional.

Fact: Serpent Mound was built inside the geological signature of a meteoric impact. The impact geology was plainly evident to early Anglo settlers, and hence likely known also to ancient occupants of the region whose monumental constructs demonstrate astronomical associations. The impressive energy of a cosmic impact remains apparent today in the surface geology surrounding the Serpent Mound.