PHILOSOPHY IN A TIME OF ERRORhttps://philosophyinatimeoferror.com
Sometimes those Sticking their Heads in the Sand are Looking for Something DeepWed, 03 Oct 2018 15:16:35 +0000en
hourly
1 http://wordpress.com/https://s0.wp.com/i/buttonw-com.pngPHILOSOPHY IN A TIME OF ERRORhttps://philosophyinatimeoferror.com
Unemployed Negativity: Breaking the Curse: On Three Recent Attempts to Theorize Neoliberalismhttps://philosophyinatimeoferror.com/2019/05/16/unemployed-negativity-breaking-the-curse-on-three-recent-attempts-to-theorize-neoliberalism/
https://philosophyinatimeoferror.com/2019/05/16/unemployed-negativity-breaking-the-curse-on-three-recent-attempts-to-theorize-neoliberalism/#respondThu, 16 May 2019 15:27:13 +0000http://philosophyinatimeoferror.com/?p=7772Jason Read reviews three recent books on neoliberalism under the title, “Breaking the Curse: On Three Recent Attempts to Theorize Neoliberalism,” at his Unemployed Negativity.

]]>PeterMy Review of Geoffrey de Lagasnerie’s Judge and Punish at boundary 2https://philosophyinatimeoferror.com/2019/04/16/my-review-of-geoffrey-de-lagasneries-judge-and-punish-at-boundary-2/
Tue, 16 Apr 2019 17:55:56 +0000http://philosophyinatimeoferror.com/?p=7766I forgot to post this on my blog site. You can find it here. It opens this way:

Geoffrey de Lagasnerie’s Judge and Punish: The Penal State on Trial, first published in French as L’État pénal face à la sociologie (The Penal State Confronts Sociology, Paris: Librairie Arthème Fayard, 2016) and translated well by Lara Vergnaud, is an at times brilliantly written polemic, decoding the ways in which we take our systems of judging and punishing as an ever-existing part of our background. This book is not a genealogy of the jurisprudential models used in the West and so is not akin to Michel Foucault’s history of the prison in Discipline and Punish (1975). Nor is it a long history of the birth of punishment as in Friedrich Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals (1887). Nor is it is call for prison abolitionism à la Angela Davis. But it is a searing and necessary brief against how we judge guilt and innocence in criminal trials that provide entree to the state networks of systemic violence against the poor, those of color, and the marginalized in general. De Lagasnerie proves an ample prosecutor of the current French system—the book is replete with memorable lines that will stick with any jury of his peers reading along—and his suit is one that can and should be brought in different jurisdictions across the West.

Yet his case all but falls apart as he comes to his summation. There, in the final chapters, after so many allegations that he is undertaking a “radical” critique of these systems, he argues for a neoliberal response to crime and justice that he argues has not yet occurred in practice. “If modern transformations of the state had truly been driven by a neoliberal logic,” he writes, “they wouldn’t have taken the form of a strengthening of the penal state,” he states as if it were a matter of fact (180). This left neoliberalism, he stipulates, would privatize much of the criminal justice system (175-6). He leaves unexplained the rapid increases in the prison population of the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia, and his home country of France, those places where fiscal austerity and neoliberalism have been strongest even as crime rates have decreased often to their historically weakest. How to explain this correlation between neoliberal governance and the steroidal increase in the rise of our prison populations if it’s not in fact a relation of causation? He offers no exculpatory evidence. His amicus curiae for neoliberalism—the idealist route when facts are not in evidence—is to say neoliberalism hasn’t been taken far enough: its hyper-individualism provides another “conception of judgment and law” (79) that has been ignored by a dépassé but still remnant state authoritarianism that neoliberalism has yet to conquer (62). Once this occurs, there will be a privatization of criminality, creating a “horizontal” relation between victimizer and victimized, with minimal intervention by the state, whose sovereign, top-down relation to those rendered guilty of crimes would all but disappear (183).

]]>PeterArendt’s mid-50s compiled writings on Marx reviewedhttps://philosophyinatimeoferror.com/2019/04/16/arendts-mid-50s-compiled-writings-on-marx-reviewed/
Tue, 16 Apr 2019 17:53:00 +0000http://philosophyinatimeoferror.com/?p=7764Published as The Modern Challenge to Tradition: Fragmente eines Buchs,
edited by Barbara Hahn and James McFarland, with Ingo Kieslich and Ingeborg Nordmann, the book is reviewed by Geoffrey Wildanger in the Boston Review:

As in her conversation, Arendt’s writing on social concerns is often characterized by defensiveness, yet she does criticize capitalism. This volume is a boon to those interested in her idiosyncratic thought on economic matters, in particular her distance from both socialist and free market thinkers. According to his dialectical model of history, Marx thought capitalism would create its own gravediggers. Arendt doubts any such tendency to self-destruction, and thus she finds nothing dialectically redeemable about the violence of the marketplace. While a free market would totally colonize the space of political action, Arendt also argues that total expropriation is “hell.” The dogged pursuit of economic ends, whether the free market or redistribution, results in mass violence. That economic compulsion can only be challenged by politics, and politics can only be determined by individuals exercising judgment in public. The problem is that the means of ensuring the possibility of exercising judgment cannot be predetermined. The Modern Challenge to Tradition does not square this circle of political checks on economic pursuits so much as it dwells in the intractability of the problem.

]]>PeterTwo new issues of Analecta Hermeneutica out now https://philosophyinatimeoferror.com/2019/01/09/two-new-issues-of-analecta-hermeneutica-out-now/
Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:53:46 +0000http://philosophyinatimeoferror.com/?p=7757Two new issues have been published: AH10 (2018), The Anthropocene, edited by Jay Foster and Jeni Barton, and AH7 (back dated to 2015), Review Issue, edited by Michelle Rebidoux. Both are open access, as always, and can be read here: https://journals.library.mun.ca/ojs/index.php/analecta/index. The second, by my Continental Philosophy of Science co-editor Jay Foster, is particularly crucial to me, though there are great articles throughout, from a quick perusal. I read Jay’s article’s first and they are important contributions, as one always expects from him. Sean McGrath’s article on nature is another excellent one, as is Uwe Voigt. Go consider this a late holiday gift of plenty of good reasing:

PeterMIMI SHELLER’S ‘CARIBBEAN FUTURES IN THE OFFSHORE ANTHROPOCENE’, A FORUM – Society & Spacehttps://philosophyinatimeoferror.com/2019/01/09/mimi-shellers-caribbean-futures-in-the-offshore-anthropocene-a-forum-society-space/
Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:30:03 +0000http://philosophyinatimeoferror.com/?p=7755While laid up in bed with the flu today, this was a pleasant (if the topic is not) roundtable with three brilliant responses at Society and Space from the recent S&S AAG session:

]]>PeterBack after a whilehttps://philosophyinatimeoferror.com/2018/10/03/back-after-a-while/
Wed, 03 Oct 2018 15:16:35 +0000http://philosophyinatimeoferror.com/?p=7751Had to redo my password. Here’s an excellent review of Vitale’s Biodeconstruction (SUNY, 2018) at https://criticalinquiry.uchicago.edu/jonathan_basile_reviews_biodeconstruction/. The book itself is excellent and picks up important parts of Derrida’s mid-70s unpublished lectures on life.
]]>Peter