Philadelphia Study: Teacher Transfers Add to Educational Inequities

A study of Philadelphia schools confirms what educators have long
suspected: Teacher transfers—even when they occur within the same
district—can exacerbate educational inequities.

The findings, presented here last week during the annual meeting of
the American Educational Research Association, are based on a study of
the employment records of 10,000 teachers working in Philadelphia
public schools during the late 1990s.

While experts have long pointed to student-mobility rates as a
hindrance to learning, fewer studies have examined mobility rates among
teachers. And most of those have focused on teachers who leave urban
districts, such as Philadelphia, for higher-paying jobs and better
working conditions in the suburbs.

Researcher Mitchell D. Chester chose instead to focus on teacher
transfers to schools within the same district. Such movements, whether
teachers left their home schools because they wanted to or because
school officials asked them to go, accounted for just under half of all
the job changes Philadelphia teachers made during the period of the
study, from September 1996 to December 1999.

Mr. Chester found that the teachers tended to move to schools with
better test scores, lower poverty rates, and lower percentages of
minority students.

A more surprising finding was that those patterns held even when
teachers, for one reason or another, were being forced to go, rather
than opting to move on their own.

"So we were shooting ourselves in the foot," said Mr. Chester, who
is the district's executive director for accountability and school
improvement.

Under the district's contract with its teachers' union, teachers who
are being asked to transfer out of a school can name five schools with
teaching vacancies to which they'd like to move. Central administrators
then choose teachers' new assignments from among those sites. But those
decisions also have to take into account the distance between teachers'
homes and their new school assignments.

In cases of voluntary transfers, any teacher with two years'
seniority can apply for a move.

'More Desirable' Schools

The "more desirable" schools that teachers ended up in tended to
have standardized-test scores that were more than 5 points higher than
those in the schools they left behind. They also enrolled 12 percent
fewer students from poor families and 12 percent fewer nonwhite
students, according to the study.

The research did not show, however, that teachers were heading to
schools that were necessarily on the upswing in student achievement and
on other indicators measured by the district, Mr. Chester said.

Some of the biggest losers in the job shuffle, the study found, were
middle schools. While elementary and high school teachers tended to
seek out spots in schools with similar grade configurations, middle
school teachers were leaving for entirely different venues. About 20
percent of the transferring teachers began in middle schools, the study
discovered, but fewer than 12 percent ended up in them.

"I think it's the fear of that age group," Mr. Chester said.

As a result of all teacher movements—intradistrict transfers
as well as teachers' departures from the district or switches to
nonteaching jobs—the jobs of one-third of Philadelphia's teachers
turned over during the four school years studied. In middle schools,
new hires outnumbered veteran teachers by a ratio of about 2-to-1.

Similar imbalances plague the district's lower-performing,
highest-poverty schools, Mr. Chester said, while principals in the most
sought-after schools in the northeastern part of the city complain of
having few opportunities to groom new teachers.

"What this transfer process has done is exacerbate inequalities in
staffing across the district," Mr. Chester said, "so that the schools
that need the best teachers and the best instruction typically don't
get those teachers and that instruction."

At the same time, the study turned up a small number of schools that
managed to maintain stable staffing patterns despite having
predominantly poor and minority student enrollments.

"When you find these exceptions, invariably you find a principal
that's got his or her act together and has created a sense of family
and of engagement," Mr. Chester said.

Although his study is based on data from Philadelphia, Mr. Chester
said he expected that the teacher-mobility trends that he found would
be typical of most of the nation's urban school districts.

The district undertook the study to prepare for contract
negotiations earlier this year with its teachers' union. As a result of
the findings, the newly approved contract now allows the school
district to pay more money to teachers in hard-to-fill subjects and to
teachers willing to work in hard-to-staff schools. The district also
shortened the time period during which teachers can apply for voluntary
transfers.

"There's a tension between wanting to tell people where to teach and
wanting them to teach where they want to," Mr. Chester said. "The
question is: How do you find the right balance?"

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.