Nationalist Alternative condemns the exemption to pre-stunning slaughter methods extended on religious grounds to Kosher and Halal as a further example of multiculturalism in action. We have previously published an article on live export and our support for pre slaughter stunning Australia wide in an effort to improve animal welfare.

.....

We condemn such practices as barbaric, inhumane, cruel and a affront to Australian morality and further examples of multiculturalism NOT enriching Australian culture. Some fellow opponents of ritual slaughter may baulk or sidestep our inclusion of multiculturalism with this issue but they are clearly linked particularly when some supporters claim their religion or culture demands/obligates this practice and that they would be discriminated against or lead ‘less fulfilling lives’ if not allowed to continue.

.....

We call to STOP ALL SLAUGHTER of ANIMALS that are NOT FULLY, PERMANENTLY STUNNED and UNCONSCIOUS PRIOR to throat slitting.
There is no use being tricked into the often decades long slow reform path of ‘ compromise ‘ with the supporters of religious slaughter.
Politically correct politicians need to gain some backbone and ensure there are no exemptions for anyone and simply weather the minority lobby groups attempts to cry foul inevitability with the old chestnuts of ‘anti semitism or islamaphobia’ and ‘ how can we possibly live without these exemptions’ et al. In 2012 general citizens are slowly waking up to the fact that these labels are merely attempts to shut down discussion and close down opponents without debating them.
We would invite those proponents of such slaughter to emigrate to lands where these methods and values hold sway.

The claim that such ritual sacrifice is humane is of course spurious when you consider the table below (Rhyne 1995).

....Incredulously we found an article titled ‘Rubashkin: It’s all a lie’ dated June 3 2008 by Ben Harris on the website jewishjournal.com which quotes Rubashkin:

“We got 21 or 23 inspectors,” Rubashkin said in a thick Yiddish accent.
“Every minute the plant is open, there is USDA inspector.
We got maybe 30 rabbis. How can we do something which is wrong?
If I want to, God forbid! We are ethical people. We don’t do no injustice to nobody,
not to a cat.” 10

In response to the right-wing political groups of the past who have resigned their mono-racial tenets (and relevance) in an effort to appease opposition forces, Nationalist Alternative has signed onto The Anti-Jerusalem Declaration.

The basis of our political activity is our inviolable commitment to nationalism within the framework of the white Western European civilisation, which sprang from the Holy Roman Empire, founded in Europe, and which now extends across the entire world – from Europe to the new world in North America, Australia, New Zealand, Argentina, South Africa and the former Rhodesia; from the East, West, South and North of Europe.

We declare that, since the time of its founding, the white Western civilisation and Judaism have found themselves in opposition: there are no “Judeo-Christian” values any more than there are “Islamo-Christian” values.

We declare, that, after the overcoming of the totalitarian systems of the 20th century, the white Western people currently faces a new global totalitarian threat: multiracialism.

The core issue we face is the survival of our own race of people, of exposing and ending the program of genocide against Whites by means of mass immigration and assimilation, Liberal ideology and Political Correctness. We affirm the right of Whites to be able to preserve their race within white nations. We recognise that this is the main struggle that we face, and we recognise that we are bound by loyalty to our race and our posterity to secure our own survival and sovereignty.

We reject Zionism, which is a fundamentalist Jewish-political-imperialist creed. The ideology of the State of Israel, and the ideology of the Holocaust – which has become the leading religion of the West, i.e., the one everyone believes in – owe their origin to Judaist, Talmudic and Semitic creeds which historically have been antithetical to the continued interests of white people, white European culture, history, tradition, spirit and religion. Even today, liberal Jewish intellectuals preach the slow culture-death – the down-going of the white man through forced multiracialism and multiculturalism, mass non-white immigration and assimilation which is against the will of the white Western peoples. At the same time, these intellectuals – and the Jewish political leaders and the self-appointed Jewish “community leaders” – strive to keep Jewish traditions intact, the Jewish ethnic group pure, and their State of Israel free of non-Jewish immigrants who come to Israel from the Arab and African world.

Far Right opportunistic, reactionary and populist outfits have sprung up, sometimes within a very short space of time; they have taken the racial crisis which the White peoples of the world are facing, and turned it into an purely ideological and non-racial struggle against Islam. Some of the outfits in question – Geert Wilders’ Freedom Party (Holland), the Freedom Party of Austria, the Flemish Vlaams Belang Party and the Swedish Democrats – signed a joint statement, the ‘Jerusalem Declaration’, professing their support for pro-Semitism, in Jerusalem in December 2011.

They support Israel and Zionism. But Diaspora Jewish intellectuals and “community leaders” are notorious for using their political power to have Western nationalists smeared, persecuted, fined and imprisoned. The Western nationalist groups who support Israel’s “right to exist” and deplore Islamism while never criticising Judaism – these groups are trying to buy protection from any Jewish blackmailers and persecutors. The aim is to present a happy face to liberal whites: ‘You see, we are friendly with the Jews, please love us’.

The Islamic threat to Western Culture, Traditions and Peoples exists because of Liberalism, because of a policy of multiracialism. We recognise that it is not the Islamic world which is ultimately responsible for the threat of Islamism in the West, but Liberalism which sponsored, and still actively protects, Islam in the west, and enables the Islamisation of urban population centers in Europe and the driving out of whites.

We, the undersigned, accept our rejection from any liberal whites who acquiesce in the slow death of the white Western peoples through mass non-white immigration; we accept our rejection by liberal Jewish intellectuals and “community leaders”; we accept our rejection by the liberal establishment. We reject the idea that the future of the West is somehow tied in any way with Israel. We do not aim to please any of these groups, instead, we strive to do what is right. We are fighting to reclaim the lands of the West and ensure the survival and self-determination of our people. We shall not stop until victory is assured and secured.

We got 21 or 23 inspectors,” Rubashkin said in a thick Yiddish accent.
“Every minute the plant is open, there is USDA inspector.We got maybe 30 rabbis. How can we do something which is wrong?If I want to, God forbid! We are ethical people. We don’t do no injustice to nobody,
not to a cat.” 10

What a joke, the presence of Rabbis means that nothing wrong will occur?

This article was prompted by a recent amusing post on You Tube at: South Troythgate National-Anarchist Manifesto Burning - YouTube , entitled ‘South Troythgate National-Anarchist Manifesto Burning’. The poster, SilentSRI, gives a fairly accurate summary of National-Anarchist positions. Ordinarily I wouldn’t pay much attention to these sorts of things, but, on watching this, I was struck by the similarity between National-Anarchism and contemporary Far Left ideas. The poster draws attention to this connection by including an excerpt from the American comedy show South Park – an episode which satirises ‘decentralist’, neo-anarchist, marijuana-smoking Occupy Wall Street-type hippies – and stating ‘This is what Southgate believes’. The idea of a connection between modern Leftism and National Anarchism got me thinking: it threw my mind back further – before modern times, South Park, before Occupy – to the time of Bakunin and Proudhon.

My belief now is that we find that just about all the ideas of the National Anarchists were anticipated by the 19th century anarchist movement, and in particular, by the great thinkers Proudhon and Bakunin and, of course, the famous ‘Utopian Socialists’ Saint-Simon, Fourier and Robert Owen (and similar ‘Utopian’ projects, e.g., the Oneida community in the USA). White Western man hasn’t had a new thought, politically, in 200 years, and certainly the Far Left hasn’t. In order to refute National Anarchism, then, all we need do is refute the anarchism of 200 years ago.

....

Quote:

...The metaphysics of National-Anarchism

Something else which is unique, I feel, is the National-Anarchist rhetorical style. One will notice that, in the rejoinders to SilentSRI, Southgate doesn’t answer the charges of Proudhonism (although it’s not characterised as such) directly; he evades them, and responds, instead, to something else (preferring to seize upon an irrelevant point). This is an old politician’s trick, of course. That is, when asked question A by a journalist in an interview, the politician won’t answer it; he’ll instead give an answer to an entirely different question, B, which wasn’t asked by the interviewer. But, more than that, there are these responses from Southgate which I, as someone who knows Southgate’s positions fairly well, found somewhat astonishing in their duplicity:As I remarked elsewhere: “Oh well, at least our shadowy friend had the decency to get back to nature and burn the thing out in the woods. Not that it actually WAS the N-AM Manifesto in the first place, of course! Why are people making such a big deal out of New Right meetings? We’re not some kind of self-appointed elite ready to step in and take over the world. In fact the meetings are organised by me personally and people simply come along, listen to the talks and then go home. It’s as simple as that. The meetings are also designed to be educational, just like the books we publish at Black Front Press. The New Right in England has no agenda whatsoever, it is just a form of political networking and we seek to provide a platform for political dissidents of all stripes. Yesterday afternoon, for example, we had a rabbi from the anti-Zionist group, Neturei Karta. I won’t take up any more of your time, but if anyone here wants to debate with me in the National-Anarchist group, then I am always happy to oblige and help clear up any misconceptions. And believe me, after reading some of the comments here, there are quite a few.”
For the record, I am not and have never been an ‘Evolian’. I disagree with a number of the Baron’s ideas, not least the concept of spiritual race and much of the neo-dualism and negativity that pervades his work in relation to what I would regard as complimentary and balanced polarities. I prefer to take a Jungian line on that type of thing. I also side with Guénon when it comes to the age-old debate surrounding the Brahmins and Kshatriyas.

....

Quote:

The question is, transposed to today’s Far Right nationalism, not whether or not to ‘compromise’ with a bourgeois liberal democratic government, but whether or not the white working peoples of Europe and the West can improve their lot through political action. If we answer ‘No’, as the National-Anarchists do, then the nationalist endeavour is over before it begins.

Nationalist Alternative released this article yesterday in response to the horrific public murder of a white British soldier. Britons are now witnessing and experiencing the tragic fruits of diversity.

The brutal attack of the 25 year old solder Lee Rigby in Woolwich on the 22nd of May was shocking, but not simply for the brutal nature of the attack, where a man is hacked to death and beheaded in broad daylight. This is shocking in itself, but was quite surprising, to this author at least, was the brazen and open nature of the attackers. The attackers, both of Nigerian descent but born in London conducted this crime with a disturbing sense of audacity and openness. The attackers upon seeing Mr Rigby in the street wearing a “Help for Heroes” T-Shirt, hit him with their Vauxhall and then set upon him and hacked him to death. The crime was conducted in broad daylight, in full view of others and on camera. After the attack, the murderers remained on the scene, speaking to people and declaring that they wanted to start a war.

One of the assailants made the following speech to someone capturing the event on video.

Quote:

“The only reason we have killed this man today is because Muslims are dying daily by British soldiers, and this British soldier is one, is a eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. By Allah, we swear by the Almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you until you leave us alone. So what if we want to live by the Sharia in Muslim lands. Why does that mean you must follow us and chase us and call us extremists and kill us? Rather you lot are extreme. You are the ones. When you drop a bomb, do you think it hits one person or rather your bomb wipes out a whole family. This is the reality. By Allah, if I saw your mother today with a buggy I would help her up the stairs. This is my nature. But we are forced by the Qur’an in Sura at-Tawba [Chapter 9 of the Qur'an], through many, many ayah [verses] throughout the Qur’an that [say] we must fight them as they fight us, a eye for a eye and a tooth for a tooth. I apologise that women had to witness this today, but in our land our women have to see the same. You people will never be safe. Remove your governments. They don’t care about you. Do you think David Cameron is gonna get caught in the street when we start busting our guns? Do you think the politicians are going to die? No it’s going to be the average guy, like you, and your children. So get rid of them. Tell them to bring our troops back so we ca.., so you can all live in peace. Leave our lands and you will live in peace. That’s all I have to say. Allah’s peace and blessings be upon Muhammad.”

This is not the first time, that supposedly “British” citizens have turned against Briton in the name of Islam. Of four bombers responsible for the 7/7 London Bombings in 2005, all four were citizens with three of them being born in England. The 2008 Exeter attempted bombing was also planned by a British born Muslim as well as the members busted planning a more recent attempt in England. Just days after the Woolwich slaying, Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) flight PK709 was threatened by two British nationals, with fighter jets being scrambled to what was appearing to be a potential hijacking. The newspapers call these men British, but their loyalty was clearly not to Britain. Nick Griffin, who predicted prior to the 7/7 London attack that British born Muslims would end up conducting a terrorist attack was vilified for this statement, but he has been proven right, multiple times.

Each time this occurs, we are told that “This is not Islam”, “This is not representative of Muslims” and the like. Meaningless statements, because for ANY political of religious movement, it is always, always a minority of people who are responsible for how it acts, whether it be Judaism, Christianity, Socialism, Islam, Fascism or Scientology. So pointing out that the acts committed in the name of Islam against the west are exceptions proves nothing, as it is always the exceptional few which shape history and shape conflict. Even during the American war of independence, the agitation and fighting was done by a minority. The passive majority simple enable the minority.

Why were these killers so brazen? We can’t be sure, but the quoted statement above shows a level of determination and willing to fight that is foreign to most Britons. White British are set to become a minority on their Island by 2060, a little over a generation from now. White Londoners are leaving London en masse mostly due to the influx of immigrants. Politically Correct laws are enforced with zeal, and any Briton who speaks against the ethnic destruction of Britain is shouted down by masses of people who are essentially too scared to admit agreeing with them. Those who criticize Islam are denounced by the same people as an “Islamophobe”, which Jim Goad defined as “Someone so terrified of Islamic retribution, they’re afraid to say anything bad about Islam.”. So true.

Watching the video of the attacker giving his threats against Britain, this definition seems to quite lucidly sum up Britain today. Where the police hold back investigating Pakistani rape gang for fear of being accused racist. Where an attack on an off duty solder takes place near the army barracks, and the attackers are milling around for 20 minutes before the police arrived. Why so long? Where despite the fact time and time again, that there are successful or aborted terror attempts against the British people, by people born in Britain, the Anti-White Brigade still browbeat people into accepting that they are all one, and that religion or background should not distinguish between Britons. Where a 14 year old can get held for an hour by police for not wanting to sit near Asian children at lunch, and where a 9 year old commits suicide after being bullied for being white and the parents still feel the need to express that they are ‘tolerant’.

It is sad to see a soldier hacked to death, but it is also sad to see the shrugging of shoulders and awkwardness that comes after such an event, where politicians are more interested in continuing to push the ‘diversity is good’ message than protect their nation against belligerents, and where the guilt ridden would rather allow themselves to be attacked and subjugated, than appear to be nationalist or act in their own self interest. This has been called a ‘terror’ attack, but I don’t think this, or the 7/7 London bombing are best described as acts of terror. Calling them acts of terror masks the deeper, underlying problem. These are acts of treason. These are acts, by people born in Britain, whom according to the indoctrination given to every schoolchild, is just as British as Shakespeare and Cromwell, against the British people. They are people who are not of the British nation. They can’t be. Not only are they not even European, let along British, their loyalty, first and foremost is to another nation, another idea, another people.

Why the brazenness by the attacker? I think it comes down to one fact. The British people, that is the White British people are essentially defenseless, both physically and ideologically. The British don’t know it, but all those who want to take advantage of them can. They are fighting someone who has both hands tied behind their back. They are fighting someone who will be stabbed in the back by those behind him, if he fights back.

Britain once ruled the world, but now it rolls out the red carpet to all and sundry in the world, including its enemies, and further to that, forces it citizens to accept them as brothers, despite the insanity such a situation. There was a time when the Western world, when whites would stand up for each other and fight for their nation. Now white people sit and watch their own destruction, as if it is some spectator sport. Once Britain could count on other commonwealth countries to fight for it, as Anglo nations rallied to support the motherland, now it is infested by anti-whites, who want to see the end of their own race and their own nation. Once men would march for their motherland, now those who fight for the survival of their own nation on their own soil, are targeted by their compatriots and government for ‘hate’. When you see the video of the attacker, hands bloodied holding the machete used to hack a soldier walking the street and threatening war to people with impunity and arrogance, just remember this. That in that country, the people who don’t accept such people becoming British are called ‘haters’ and ‘intolerant’ and risk prison.

Danon and Danby discussed the issue during the Australian politician’s visit to Israel for the World Jewish Congress’s International Conference of Jewish Parliamentarians.

“The arrival of thousands of Muslim infiltrators to Israeli territory is a clear threat to the state’s Jewish identity,” Danon told The Jerusalem Post.

“The refugees’ place is not among us, and the initiative to transfer them to Australia is the right and just solution.

“On the one hand, it treats the refugees and migrants in a humane way. On the other hand, it does not threaten Israel’s future and our goal to maintain a clear and solid Jewish majority,” he explained.

Danon said Danby enthusiastically agreed to present the idea to the Australian Parliament.

Your comment makes the stand taken by the Zionophile 'patriots' of certain groups (APP and the new Freedom Party) ridiculous. Given too, the recent signing by many Australian politicians of the so-called 'London Declaration Against Anti Semitism', it is clear indeed where the establishment stands. Total commitment to Israel, open borders for Australia.

In response to the right-wing political groups of the past who have resigned their mono-racial tenets (and relevance) in an effort to appease opposition forces, Nationalist Alternative has signed onto The Anti-Jerusalem Declaration.

I as an individual totally agree with this declaration and i will be happy to sign my name to it!

The members of Nationalist Alternative are not members of any political party; nor we do give much credence to the farce which is ‘liberal democracy’ in Australia today. Nevertheless, several comrades in the movement have been asking us as to who, in our opinion, they should vote for in the upcoming federal election in September 2013. Our answer to this is based on a careful consideration of the political parties on the nationalist and Far Right side of the political spectrum at this point in time; and it is, vote for Australia First.

We agree with Australia First’s platform on three key points:

i) The menace of Chinese immigration. In the past 15 years, China has undertaken a campaign of expansionism and imperialism and has sought to expand its power into the Pacific region. It has taken aim at our country, the most prosperous and resource-rich white Western nation in the South Pacific, and is seeking to conquer it – economically and demographically. Since 2004, nearly a quarter of million immigrants, mostly from China and India, have been flocking to Australia every year, under an open-door immigration policy introduced by the “conservative” Liberal government and continued by the socialist Labor government. The objective has been to transform Australia demographically, to destroy the Aussie population and replace us with a mixed race Indian, Filipino, Vietnamese, African, Middle Eastern but mostly Chinese one. The results of this policy are visible for all to see. Sydney and Melbourne are fast becoming Chinese cities, like Singapore, Hong Kong, Shanghai and Beijing.

Concomitant with this is Chinese expansionism on the economic level, which manifests itself in foreign direct investment in our resources and real estate. We note the growing local power of Chinese-Australians who are becoming overrepresented in the select high schools & universities, and who are turn dominating the professional and managerial ranks. This leads to a future in which Asians will have increasing influence on the corridors of power – an influence which makes itself felt out of all proportion to the raw numbers of immigrants arriving. Yet Opposition leader Abbott does not care about this: he is only indignant about low-skill immigrants – the illegal immigrants who arrive here on boat.Chinese immigration portends a future in which our grandchildren – who enjoy some playtime after school and sports/arts on a Saturday not just homework/homework – who are outgunned by an almost robotic work ethic which informs the lives of many Asian children with ‘Tiger’ mums. This is a zero net sum game and a race to the bottom which will see your grandchildren sweeping the floors of Asian owned businesses. We could have easily chosen such a way to live but we did not. Our way of life, our culture upholds a balanced ‘work to live’ lifestyle, something that on a cultural level partly differentiates what being an Australian is and one of the things Australians died for in their thousands during two world wars.

Australia First understands the Chinese threat. They make it a central point in their ideology. Other nationalist parties focus, to an obsessive degree, on Islamist immigrants, African immigrants, or immigrants who come illegally, via boat. These issues may be the focus of European Nationalist parties, due to the severity of these issues in Europe, and it goes without saying that Australian nationalists ought to be concerned about Islamist, African and illegal immigration, but they should not lose focus on the bigger threat to Australia’s sovereignty and demographic survival, which is China.

ii) Neither Islamism nor Judaism. In the Jerusalem Declaration, both Australia First and Nationalist Alternative stated their opposition to the strange and recent phenomenon of the pro-Semitic, pro-Israel outfits – e.g., Geert Wilders’ Freedom Party – on the Continent which have their imitators even in Australia, disregarding the differing immigration issues which exist here from the Continent. These gangs attempt to link Western nationalism and immigration restrictionism to the Israeli and Jewish cause, despite the fact that a) the pro-Israel lobby, in every Western country, always vociferously opposes policies of immigration restriction in Western countries while at the same time upholding immigration restriction as a holy right in the State of Israel itself; and b) the Jewish-Middle Eastern-Semitic culture has traditionally been antithetical to the Christian religion and to the Western civilisation (since its inception in Christian and medieval Europe). In short, one cannot buy favours from the State of Israel, the pro-Israel Jewish lobby groups and the self-appointed leaders of the various Jewish “community organisations” dotted throughout the Jewish Diaspora. They are no friends of Western nationalism.

At the same time, many Western nationalist and racialist groups and individualists make the mistake of going the other way: into the arms of this Islamist, Arabic, Pakistani or Persian regime or the other, simply because of a perception that such a regime declares itself to be ‘opposed to Israel and the Jews’. Western nationalists of this persuasion will praise Islamism in the case of Iran and Hezbollah, and deplore it in the case of the anti-Assad and anti-Ghaddafi rebels; they will deplore brutal government suppression of anti-government protests by civilians in the case of post-Morsi Egypt, and applaud it, or at least stay silent regarding it, in Assad’s Syria and Ghaddafi’s Libya (and denounce, like Assad and Ghaddafi, the protestors as ‘terrorists’, who deserve to be imprisoned, shot at, maimed, killed, etc.); they cry to the heavens when Arab civilians are killed by Jewish-Israeli soldiers in Gaza, but stay mute when Arab civilians are killed by Assadist soldiers in Damascus, displaying Arabism and liberal humanism in one instance, cynicism in the other; they will denounce Judaist and Talmudic religious fundamentalism, which has made itself felt in the West largely through genuflection to the State of Israel and the Jewish-religious notion of the Holocaust (the “Shoah”) but refuse to condemn the same obscurantism in the Arab and Islamic world – and in the Middle Eastern immigrant “communities” proliferating in the West.

It is easy, for a nationalist in the West today, to fall into the trap of either pro-Israelism and Judaism, or pro-Arabism and Islamism – or to think that both of these are ‘either-or’, that is, one must choose one or the other. It is our view that Australia First, like Nationalist Alternative, understands that such thinking is fallacious, and charts the middle course. It understands that there are pro-Semitic, crypto-religious maniacs like Wilders; but also skilled operators, in the Middle East and Islamic world, politicians and demagogues
who are adept at using (supposed) “anti-Zionist” credentials to curry favour among left-liberal and Far Right Westerners in order to garner foreign support and that way hopefully prolong their stay in power. Australia First, like Nationalist Alternative do not believe that a Western Nationalist need be a partisan in the Israeli-Arab conflict.

iii) For the working man. At present, the Australian worker is caught between the pincers of the neoliberal and “conservative” Right (who control the Liberal Party, the big business lobbies and the “conservative” think-tanks and commentators) and the left-liberals (who control the Labor Party, the Greens and the communist parties and anarchist groups). The Right wants to introduce mass immigrant labour, mostly from China, to break organised labour and undermine the working conditions of blue- and white-collar Australian workers and to depress our wages and living conditions; the Left wants to introduce it to demographically destroy us, in the name of “diversity” and righting historic wrongs (real or alleged) by Australians against the indigenous population – wrongs which can only be righted by the demographic extinction of Australians, which, by default, will also lead to the extinction of the Aboriginals who the Left pretend to care about.

The Left no longer regards the Australian workers as being oppressed – only Palestinians, refugees, indigenous people, and homosexuals deserve that mantle now, in their view – and actively seeks to wipe the Australian worker out. In contrast, it is the blue-collar union movement – not the Left, not the Right, not the universities, the churches, the schools, the armed forces, the media, the intellectuals – which wants immigration restrictions, albeit in a limited way, e.g., in its opposition to 457 visas; as a result, it is (paradoxically) the one conservative force in this country at the moment. In the old days, Labor prime ministers, monarchist conservatives, press barons, mining magnates, bohemian intellectuals, Catholic priests, supported immigration restrictionism, but now, in 2013, the radical anti-Australian Left has completed its long march through the institutions and vanquished all opposition to mass non-white immigration and the demographic destruction of Australia. Only the union movement is left to hold the fort – and reaps denunciations, from the neoliberal Right and the communist Left, for doing so.

This explains the importance of a nationalist political party seeking to act as the vanguard of the workers of Australia. The Australia First Party aims to fulfil this role, whereas other parties ignore the workers altogether.
This sums up why we are endorsing Australia First in the absence of a Nationalist Alternative candidate. Australia First is the closest party contesting the 2013 Federal election ideologically, and through examination of party policies and attitudes, the party most clearly expressing a desire to protect our nation. Some malcontents in the nationalist movement and beyond believe that contesting elections is futile: we say that elections and political parties are never futile, and history has shown that even the most radical and anti-parliamentarian political movements needed the form of a political party, competing in liberal democratic elections, as a springboard. Parties, elections, campaigning are but one tier of the struggle and a) help organise and engage the membership of one’s own organisation and b) raise awareness amongst the masses as a whole. We urge Australian patriots this September to get out and campaign for, and vote for, Australia First.