Hi Stefan, thanks for the links, ideed it is good for interested parties to look it up. I wanted to avoid to make this discussion specific though, because it is something that can be improved at the OCA base line. This is why the cited attitude is an illustrative and pointed pars pro toto. I hope it has been widely understood as such, and not as offence or something alike.

On 15-10-15 20:12, David Arnold wrote:
>
> And third input:
> Some reviewer's "gateway attitude" on PRs without adequate levels of
> comprehension and guidance is probably the one thing that most impacts
> the OCA experience.
>
> Any of the kind of "I do it for free in my spare time so shut up"
> attitude is not a favour to the OCA's goals.
>
> OCA always will be a "soft authority", and constitution of "soft
> authorities" work quite a bit different.
>
> Look at the docker example, they do many things very well.
>
Hi David,
assuming you are talking about your aborted attempts to change the
OpenUpgrade documentation, let me link to the discussions so that
everyone can judge by themselves.
https://github.com/OCA/OpenUpgrade/pull/364https://github.com/OCA/OpenUpgrade/pull/365
Where do you read "I do it for free in my spare time so shut up" exactly?
Thanks,
Stefan.
--
Opener B.V. - Business solutions driven by open source collaboration
Stefan Rijnhart - Consultant/developer
mail: stefan@opener.am
tel: +31 (0) 20 3090 139
web: https://opener.am