A tragic phenomenon which is taking a terrible toll on everyone involved.

There is a dire phenomenon rising in Europe that is crippling entire societies and yet the continent sleeps, refusing not only to confront the destructive elephant in the room, but also to admit its very existence.

The troubling reality being referred to is the widespread practice of Muslim inbreeding and the birth defects and social ills that it spawns.

The tragic effect of the Lefts control of the boundaries of debate is that any discussion about vital issues such as these marks an individual as an Islamophobe and a racist.

A person who dares to point at the pathology of inbreeding in the Muslim community is accused of whipping up hatred against Muslim people.

But all of this could not be further from the truth. To fight against inbreeding anywhere is to defend humanity and to defend innocent babies from birth defects.

Fighting against this Islamic practice stems from a pro-Muslim calling, since identifying destructive ideologies and practices in Islam enables the protection of the Muslim people from harm.

No offense to anyone with Trisomy 21 but at what point will these people become too retarded to figure out how to set off a bomb? After 50 generations of incest they should have reached that point by now.

The Moslem preference for first cousin marriage may well be based on folk wisdom that allows those societies to isolate schizophrenia (and 5 other serious mental problems) from the rest of society.

I went looking for the incidence of schizophrenia on the net and found that in the US we have a 1.2% average incidence. African Americans have triple that incidence. Some old studies suggested Checnyans were as high as 9% ~ they, BTW, have some strange marriage rules ~ one set for women and a different set for men. They seem geared to minimizing harmful autosomal recessives, so there may again be a folk observation about breeding habits and resultant mental problems.

Just guessing but given the extreme legalism found in Islam, their schizophrenia rate is probably up around 20% or maybe even more!

Bet it's difficult to find moderates in that crowd ~ but rather easy to locate a suicide bomber, or someone happy to kill people for no reason at all.

Part of it is incest, but the other sickening aspect of Islam is pedophilia. The prophet Mohammad, may he damned to hell, was a pedophile. Islam is utter evil. Any true believer is infected with that evil.

Recently these sodomites have moved into my area. They are not trying to be American. They want to impose their ways. There will be a day of reckoning.

GOOGLE
Anti-incest app built by Iceland college students
Nidhi Subbaraman NBC News
April 17, 2013 at 3:16 PM ET

Google
The ÍslendingaApp SES(Beta) built by Sad Engineer Studios.
A group of students at the University of Iceland in Reykjavík have created an Android app that prevents Icelanders from accidentally dating their cousins.

The app draws information from the Íslendingabók database, a national record of Iceland residents and family trees dating back into the Middle Ages.

Arnar Aðalsteinsson, Alexander Helgason and Hákon Björnsson, in their final year at the University of Iceland, entered and won an app-building contest sponsored by the tenders of the Íslendingabók database.

When you tap phones with someone who has the app, it brings up an alert if the owners of the two phones share a grandparent. (Of course, if you don’t already know who you share a grandparent with, incest may be the least of your problems, but the team says it is looking into functionality for spotting common great grandparents, too.)

The feature is called “Sifjaspellsspillir” which directly translates to “Incest Destroyer,” though the team prefers the phrase “Incest Spoiler.”

The app has been downloaded 3,651 times at their last check, the team told NBC News. An app for the iPhone is very likely on the way, they say.

“Genealogy is the kind of the national hobby of Iceland,” Friðrik Skúlason, a software engineer who first started building the Íslendingabók database in the 1980s, told NBC News. “On average if you pick two people on the street at random you will find they are related 6 or 7 generations back.”

The database was taken over by genetics company DeCode. Íslendingabók is now a free database for anyone with an Iceland national identification to use online, where they can trace relatives and their contact information.

“[Iceland] is a small community with extensive records gong back centuries, and everybody is related to everybody else,” Skúlason told NBC News. “The database contains every single person who is currently alive or that we have been able to find any information about for the past 1,100 years.”

He hasn’t used the app himself, but Skúlason imagines it will make for good pickup lines at a bar. “My phone would really like to know if it’s related to your phone there are possibilities,” he says. Although, he adds, most people already know each others’ close relatives well.

About two-thirds of the country has accessed the database at least once, he says, with spikes in activity during Christmas, “I guess when people are writing Christmas cards and trying to remember what is the name of Uncle Joe’s third child and so on,” and during the summer, when people plan the traditional family reunions.

That is why any who claim to be moderate are just blowing smoke to enjoy the priviledges of being here...they could give two cents about this country or they would deny ISlam and their dastardly prophet...and burn their Koran.

When you look at their prophet anyone who follows his teachings is going to have some form of mental illness...

Some interesting facts from a New Book...

“The Mental Illness of the Prophet Muhammed”

Exerts:

....the five oldest and most trusted ‘Islamic sources’ do not portray Muhammad a superior being or any kind Godly mercy for mankind. The sources reveal that he was a thief, a liar, an assassin, a pedophile, a shameless womanizer, a promiscuous husband, a rapist, a mass-murderer, a desert pirate, a warmonger, a spineless coward and a calculating and ruthless tyrant. It is certainly not the character profile of the founder of a true religion.

....given some of Muhammad’s well-known documented behaviors, it is certain that he had a conflict-ridden psychological dependence on others..... He equated love with weakness and feared intimacy...... He inflicted pain and abuse on others as his second nature.....

He was unable to give his followers a reason to live, so he gave them enough reasons to die  die in Allahs name to enter paradise...... He could not convince the Arabs to choose his religion based upon its merits, so he threatened them with damnation....... The religion he preached was more about fantasy, less about proof.

A person who, among other atrocities, orders, and then watches, the beheading of 800 innocent people, and beds the wife of a man whom he had tortured to death on the same night cannot be considered psychologically normal..... Common sense alone tells us that a 51-year-old man, who marries a 6-year-old girl, is abnormal..... The notion that a godly revelation would focus on the sexual desires of a lecherous man is really disgusting.

Muhammad had shown all the symptoms of his lunacy and his prophetic claim was based on the quicksand of grand delusion.... But the irony is that the entire religion of Islam is based on the truth claim of such a man, who could easily swing back and forth between the two extremes  reality and fantasy.

Religion was just a cause for Muhammad. He actually worshipped his own image  not God..... He had created Allah in his own image and attributed to that God the qualities of his own self...... Allah was a plastic entity that Muhammad shaped to meet his needs.....

That is why Allah seems a multidimensional entity in the Quran, an obedient servant that Muhammad used on all occasions, from managing the harem affairs of his wives to swearing to punish mercilessly whosoever disagrees with His beloved messenger.

No religion in the world has ever destroyed family ties as Muhammad has done in Islam.

or, the more rational alternative, Mohamed didn't really exist. Sure, there was a religious reformer ~ and we now know what he was involved in ~ suppressing an Hindu snake cult operated out of the kaaba.

All the other stuff was created in Damascus a long time after the man's death.

If you love your daughter you have very little choice. In islam she is a slave so that daughter you love, you keep her close where you have some say on her treatment (your clan or close family) otherwise if you care nothing for her you marry her outside the clan or family where you have no say on her treatment in a society that has taught their men women are from the devil and a lower life form that you can beat or betray on a whim.

Mulsim incest is a form of love believe it or not. Islam is a sick religion and only leads to evil even when you are trying your best to protect those you love.

I wonder to what degree the spread of Islam was on the influx of fresh DNA / outbreeding via the captured concubines. The first generation took over by surprise and zeal - the second through training by experienced warriors and without inbreeding depression of their intelligence.

Getting back on topic, if we're looking for a royal personage who was a victim of inbreeding depression the clearest candidate is Carlos II (1661-1700), the last Habsburg king of Spain. Most history books will tell you his deficiencies were the result of excessive inbreeding, but let's look at the evidence for ourselves.

How inbred was he?

That Carlos was the product of inbreeding is undeniable. Since the days of his ancestor Charles V (1500-1558, aka Carlos I of Spain), the Habsburgs had been in the habit of marrying members of the family's Spanish branch to members of the Austrian branch. Oh yeah, in their heyday the Habsburgs controlled not only the Spanish and Austrian Empires but also the low countries (Benelux), Portugal, southern Italy (Naples and Sicily), Milan and Burgundy.

Have a look at Carlos II's family tree. His mother and father were niece and uncle. Granted, this was sort of an accident of history given that this was Philip IV's second marriage, and it just so happened that none of the sons of his first wife, Elisabeth of Bourbon, lived long enough to accede to the throne.

(1) Carlos was descended from his great great great grandparents Juana la Loca (1479-1555) and Philip the Handsome (1478-1506, Felipe el Hermoso) through three of their children.

(2) whereas someone whose ascendants (i.e. direct ancestors) were all unrelated to their spouses would have 32 great great great grandparents, Carlos only had 14.

How messed up was he?

Carlos' physical and mental deficiencies earned him the nickname "El Hechizado" (The Hexed). First off, there was his debilitating overbite. Prominent chins ran in the Habsburg family (check out the portraits of Charles V or of Carlos' father Philip IV), but with Carlos II the condition was so bad that he had problems chewing. It's also said that it was difficult to understand Carlos when he spoke and that he frequently drooled. To me this seems analogous to those overly purebred Persian cats whose faces are so flat that they have respiratory problems and their tear ducts get blocked up.

This, however, was the least of Carlos' problems. He was feeble and sickly, prone to high fevers which kept him confined to his bed. It's also said that he suffered from seizures, that he invariably vomited on carriage rides due to chronic motion sickness, and that his eyes oozed liquid in open air. In addition to his physical shortcomings, Carlos II was purportedly dim-witted and he was left basically uneducated. The classic 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica claims "there was no room in his nearly imbecile mind for more than childish superstition, insane pride of birth, and an interest in court etiquette." Due to his weak health, he remained mostly idle while his mother, his bastard brother Don Juan José of Austria, and his advisors made most of the decisions affecting the Empire, with Carlos' most vigorous activity consisting of the occasional hunt.

Although he was married twice Carlos II fathered no children, and it is assumed that he was infertile if not actually impotent. His reign as king was largely disastrous and his inability to produce an heir led to the War of Spanish Succession.

Was this inbreeding depression?

As I said above, Carlos' mandibular prognasthism sounds like a heriditary physical trait which became exacerbated to the point of becoming a deformity due to inbreeding. Moreover, his sickliness and sexual dysfunction appear analogous to immunity and reproduction problems which have been documented in highly inbred lab rats. Therefore, I think it seems very likely that Carlos' problems did indeed stem from inbreeding depression.

Interestingly enough, Carlos' sister the Infanta Margarita Teresa (1651-1673, who as a little girl was the subject of Velázquez's masterpiece Las Meninas) was not affected by the same problems as him. She was lively and beautiful although, judging by her portrait, she looks like she had a strong chin. Margarita was married to the Emperor Leopold I (her uncle and first cousin) who was himself pretty inbred and had an abnormal underbite although he was otherwise fit and intelligent. They had six children (only one of whom survived to adulthood) before Margarita died at the age of 21.

37
posted on 05/12/2013 10:03:31 PM PDT
by Slings and Arrows
(You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)

*Technically* it’s not incest, at least as our society currently defines that. Incest is a sexual relationship with a *near* blood relative such as sibling, parent, or grandparent. Breeding with cousins isn’t incest ... it’s just icky.

The term the writer should have used was “inbreeding” rather than “incest.” Interestingly, inbreeding is sometimes used by breeders of horses, etc. in search of strengthening a particular physical trait. But of course, horse breeders have the freedom to cull the genetic disasters.

39
posted on 05/12/2013 10:59:09 PM PDT
by Hetty_Fauxvert
(FUBO, and the useful idiots you rode in on!)

No wonder Islamic societies never have any real achievements and everyone lives in squalor — except to the extent they can seel oil or steal from someone else who is productive. They are the ultimate Marxists, redistributing and stealing wealth.

I wonder to what degree the spread of Islam was on the influx of fresh DNA / outbreeding via the captured concubines. The first generation took over by surprise and zeal - the second through training by experienced warriors and without inbreeding depression of their intelligence.

Their "Golden Age" lasted only as long as their expansion. Once they no longer had an influx of loot and slaves who knew how to run a civilization, the Islamic world stagnated.

Polygamy fed their wars of expansion. A man who cannot afford the bride price to get a Muslim wife, will be quite a zealous warrior if he knows that his only hope of getting laid is to capture a woman of his own.

45
posted on 05/13/2013 9:59:28 AM PDT
by PapaBear3625
(You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)

The term the writer should have used was inbreeding rather than incest. Interestingly, inbreeding is sometimes used by breeders of horses, etc. in search of strengthening a particular physical trait. But of course, horse breeders have the freedom to cull the genetic disasters.

Which is what warfare used to do for them.

46
posted on 05/13/2013 10:05:15 AM PDT
by PapaBear3625
(You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.