The original plan was to split it up similar to how the question arcs for Higurashi were in season one and the answer arcs were in season two. But the Umineko anime was legendarily bad, and DVD sales didn't warrant a second season. So yeah, after they finished adapting the question arcs they just kinda stopped. I actually got into Umineko through the anime, and yeah, it was frustrating to not get a conclusion, but I think it was for the better. Umineko is not one of those stories that can be easily adapted into a visual medium.

Ever since the recent online update, I've been paired up with people with significantly higher GSP than me. Any time I'm paired up with someone relatively around the same GSP, I win without losing a stock, but any progress I make is negated the very next game when I get paired with someone way higher on the ladder than me. I'm convinced there isn't any MMR in Smash.
Also I have over 1 mil GSP with Ganondorf despite playing one FFA match with him, one that I lost. I don't understand how GSP actually works.

My last name isn't really that hard for most people to pronounce. However, it's very uncommon, and it's only a couple letters off from a much more common last name. People often assume my last name is the more common one.

I would like to agree with you. But that was the point of Moby's post. They've been planning to make tumblr more advertiser friendly for months now, to the point of making an algorithm so strict that it flags the very post that announced the changes, but in that wasn't included a ban on extremist politics. We know that they didn't target left wing politics because Verizon was trying to cater to them. So imagine if included in the rules were "oh, and nazis are banned too." There still would have been the shitstorm over the porn ban, but I'd wager a guess that a lot of left wing slacktivists would have attempted to defend tumblr if that was what happened. But they didn't, and if this was a bid to make tumblr easier to monetize, a ban on right wing extremism should have been on the docket if their advertisers actually cared. It's pretty difficult to teach a computer to detect porn. It's a lot less difficult to teach a computer how to recognize words from a white nationalist glossary and build associations between them. They don't even have to be that thorough, since they're clearly not bothered by innocent posts getting caught in the crossfire.
Before 2016, I probably would have agreed with you. It sounds like it should be true. But that's not how things play out in reality. Every social media service quietly hosts extremists of all political agendas, and then when one of them acts out, the company will loudly proclaim that it's distancing itself from those people before quietly going back to the status quo once the social fervor dies down.

That doesn't really appear to be true though, at least, not in the US. Associating your brand with outright porn is always seen as a negative because of how the US views sex. Extremist politics, on the other hand, can be a positive, depending on the situation and current events. There's a reason that companies didn't start publicly distancing themselves from right wing extremism until someone died. Extremists are dangerous, but they're devoted. People who are devoted generate clicks and advertising revenue. Most social media platforms are quick to clamp down on nsfw or unmarked nsfw material if it gets posted, but extremists on both ends of the spectrum are usually given a free pass until a point where the potential lost revenue from those outraged outweighs the potential gained revenue from the devoted.