Attention!!! Pro Sports Daily will be down on Wednesday morning from 5:00am - 7:00am eastern time for database maintenance. All Sports Direct Inc. properties will be down during this scheduled outage.
Sorry for any inconvenience that this outage may cause.

If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

IF the seahawks were to move Chancellor to OLB, this offseason would be the time. It is a ver deep safety draft.

IF not then try and get Mosely in the late first, and go WR in the second and possibly 3rd.

Also, the seahawks have quite a bit of $ in cap space, who (if anyone) should they pursue this offseason??

No one. We have a top 3 starting secondary and they are making bottom 3 money and I doubt that will last much longer. That will seriously eat into any cap. Don't wast money in FA because it nearly never works. It is better to continue with the draft and think long term.

Yeah we need a 3 tech and someone to take over for Hill once he's done. However, I think you all overestimate his age. He's on the right side of 30.

Alec Ogletree. I'm telling you. That'd give us the option to put Bam Bam at SAM and Ogletree at SS. That makes our defense even more dynamic, and allows us to use different packages with different players all over.

Yeah we need a 3 tech and someone to take over for Hill once he's done. However, I think you all overestimate his age. He's on the right side of 30.

Alec Ogletree. I'm telling you. That'd give us the option to put Bam Bam at SAM and Ogletree at SS. That makes our defense even more dynamic, and allows us to use different packages with different players all over.

My views on Hill have NOTHING to do with age. He is HORRIBLE in coverage and it is pointless to keep around one-dimensional players that becomes a liability on the field.

My views on Hill have NOTHING to do with age. He is HORRIBLE in coverage and it is pointless to keep around one-dimensional players that becomes a liability on the field.

I wouldn't go as far to say he's a liability on the field. The one time where he has really ****ed up in coverage is that one TD he gave up against Miami. But he's not a black hole like Aaron Curry is and was.

I wouldn't go as far to say he's a liability on the field. The one time where he has really ****ed up in coverage is that one TD he gave up against Miami. But he's not a black hole like Aaron Curry is and was.

He has definitely lost a step and is HORRIBLE in coverage. While I'll admit he's no Aaron Curry (no one else could be that bad, LOL) Hill can definitely be upgraded. He does not possess the range that almost all LBs coming out have.