Yes. One typical pattern is to ask for more ballots because of the “crowd”, then ask for a time extension, then get certain observers out, then start filling in names and casting ballots for them, but not all of them until you hear how many are needed.

In some areas they go for broke and just make the turnout be 100%.

You’d think, though that since so many know how it’s done that there would be ONE bust of such a factory. That’s a major problem with the concept.

One problem is that this happens in places where you can’t legally run a video camera on the door and count.

Despite claims to the contrary, Michigan actually has some of the strictest voting laws in the country. No early voting, no “no excuse” absentee voting (for people under 65), they must ask for ID and if you don’t have one you must sign an affidavit that you’re a legal voter (that signed confession does have an effect). Detroit and Flint are naturally the big problem areas with both cities taking days to turn in tallies.

The ACLU and illegals started screeching the day after the election. The illegals complained that the SOS refusing to give them driver’s licenses made them afraid to vote. The ACLU is demanding early voting, they want “No excuse” absentee voting, they want people to be able to vote at any precinct that happens to be near where ever they happen to be. They want same day registration, and want people to pick up a ballot and take them home to fill out.

27 posted on 11/23/2012 5:07:18 AM PST by cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)

One problem is that this happens in places where you cant legally run a video camera on the door and count.
**********************************************
I’m willing to run a camera and risk arrest ... we can certainly run a camera across the street from a van/apartment/window ... many polling places are used for decades and we all know how to read the results and pick a good candidate venue to tape from inside .. cameras today are TINY...