Saleh v. Bush involves claims by an Iraqi woman, Sundus Shaker Saleh,
that former President George W. Bush and other high ranking Bush-era
officials broke the law when they planned and waged the Iraq War.

Saleh alleges that former Bush Administration leaders committed the
crime of aggression when they planned and executed the Iraq War, a war
crime that was called the “supreme international crime” at the Nuremberg
Trials in 1946.

Saleh is appealing the immunity provided to the Defendants by the district court in December 2014.
“We are pleased that the Ninth Circuit will hear argument. To my
knowledge, this is the first time a court will entertain arguments that
the Iraq War was illegal under domestic and international law,” Saleh’s
attorney D. Inder Comar, legal director at Comar LLP, said. “This is
also the first time since World War II that a court is being asked to
scrutinize whether the war itself was an illegal act of aggression — a
special war crime that was defined at the Nuremberg Trials in 1946.”
Comar is handling Saleh’s case pro bono.

Assuming the oral argument takes place, the argument will be live streamed and recorded on the Ninth Circuit’s YouTube channel,
permitting members of the public to watch the argument. The Court’s
calendar commences at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time on December 12th; the case
will likely be heard later in the morning, as it is last on the Court’s
calendar.

In addition to former President Bush, Saleh has named former
Administration officials Richard Cheney, Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice,
Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz as defendants in the case.

In December 2014, the district court dismissed Saleh’s lawsuit,
holding that the defendants were immune from further proceedings
because of the federal Westfall Act of 1988 (28 U.S.C. § 2679). The
Westfall Act immunizes former federal officials in civil lawsuits if a
court determines that the official was acting pursuant to the legitimate
scope of his or her employment.

Saleh disputes the immunity, arguing that the planning and waging of a
war of aggression against Iraq fell outside the legitimate scope of
employment of former President Bush and the other defendants.