The High Court may have ruled that the Right to Education (RTE) Act does not apply to unaided minority schools even if they have been receiving aids in the form of concessions in property tax and lease of land from the government, but activists feel ambiguities persist on the 'aided' and 'unaided' status of schools. One of the major issues on which the HC verdict can have widespread effect, the activists say, is whether schools that have unaided primary and aided secondary sections are liable to reserve 25 per cent students under the RTE Act or not. The respondents are preparing to file a petition in the Supreme Court against the Bombay HC verdict.