Pages

Wednesday, August 17, 2016

Trump and Putin: Birds of a Feather

I spent this morning chatting about Trump and the strange role of Russia in the US election on radio stations across Canada. As usual, there was a basic set of questions asked over and over (eight hits this time). What was asked? What did I say? While some of the hosts went off script slightly, this was the gist:

1. What do you think of the ways in which Russia is being
raised in the American election campaign...How surprising is it to you that
Russia has taken this sort of prominence?

It is pretty amazing. During the Cold War, the Soviet Union
played a major role in elections but only as a question: is a candidate up for
dealing with the threat?After 1991,
Russia was less relevant and then people, including myself, scoffed when Mitt
Romney listed Russia as biggest threat in 2012.But since Crimea and the war in Ukraine, Russia is relevant again but
now it is actually seeking to influence the election

2. How much of a preference does the Russian Government
or Vladimir Putin have between the two U-S Presidential candidates?

Trump, on other hand, has very visibly promised a set of
policies that Putin prefers: recognizing Crimea, softening sanctions, not being
so enthusiastic about supporting Ukraine, potentially breaking NATO, and that last one is one of Putin's highest priorities. So, yes, Putin has a very clear preference.

3. There have been accusations directed at Trump's
campaign manager, Paul Manafort, accusing him of pro-Russian ties. How
plausible is it that Russia is exerting influence through members of the
Trump campaign?

[This one was slightly overcome by events since Manafort got demoted last night with word breaking this morning]

The ties between Manafort and Putin/Russia are pretty clear,
as he worked for pro-Russian figures in Ukraine and elsewhere

It is hard to explain the stances of Trump on Russia without
thinking that someone is pushing this as there is no real domestic constituency
pushing for this AND the effort to change the GOP platform at the convention was
a major exertion of political capital.Why?Because elements within the
campaign care a great deal.

4. There are also allegations that Russia is behind hacks
of the D-N-C and the Clinton campaign's computer servers. Do you think this is
the sort of thing the Russian state would undertake?

5. What does all of this suggest about the U.S.
relationship with Russia over the longer term, after the election?

HRC is going to win, and she will remember this
unprecedented effort by Russia to influence a US election.So, expect an increased chill in US-Russian
relations but not that much change in substance since US is already confronting
Russia over Ukraine and is already reinforcing NATO in the Baltics/Poland.

No comments:

Stephen M. Saideman

Intro

Greetings! I am a political scientist, specializing in International Relations, my research and teaching focus on ethnic conflict and civil-military relations. I watch way too much TV, and I like movies as well so I tend to write about both and find IR stuff in pop culture. I rant alot about American politics and sometimes about Canadian politics. I like to take ideas I once learned a long time ago and apply them to whatever strikes my fancy.