Alright, I can see that this has gotten out of control. The links are cherry picked to help support a certain view. Is anyone really going to debate the fact that the Drudge Report is completely there to serve the purpose of being a cheerleader and a spigot for the right to drink, and then spew forth what they read and assume is informed fact when in- fact it's a bunch of bullshit. As for PUH-LEEZ, I would love to know what you do for fun? I assume you go through the Bible picking certain scripture to help prove whatever point you want to make. I bet you think all those stories are true also.

Let's put this in perspective. Would anyone in any city vote for Obama because he gave them a space shuttle? Do most people even care about the shuttles? Probably not. This is lower level government decisions. I doubt NASA gets Obama's opinions about where to place retired space relics.

The Drudge Report should be classified as fiction reading for entertainment purposes only. I have never seen, said news reporting, be so consistently off base, and without much in the way of facts. It seems to be headed and reported by a bunch of petulant children. I click on the site just so I can have a glimpse into the ridiculous minds of the fear mongering right (that's so often wrong). Houston didn't get a shuttle boo hoo. I don't think he gave a shit about who gets an old shuttle or not. He has a lot bigger issues that are pressing and have an impact on human life worldwide.

I like how the interviewer was happy to include many Perry stances in his narration unchallenged but couldn't even show Obama enough respect to let him state his answers. I don't know how the president has the patience to humor these media hacks.

I think so.I believe Yahoo is very right wing. though it tries to downplay it. If not why didn't they attempt to clear up the issue. Wouldn't you be interested in knowing who was telling the truth. Don't you think it is odd they didn't even check procedure on the matter. If they did they would have mentioned the reporter is wrong. Obama like his predcissors don't chose the fates of retired space shuttles . Two commissions oversee what happens to NASA equipment one decides the status when it is out of commission--the other what to do with those not slated for destruction. And the commissions don't change from each White House administrations.

No, I'm agreeing with you. W was the best president ever in the history of the United States, which to my knowledge was when history itself began. He was a saint and never made any mistakes, which is why he never admitted any when he was in office. Only someone with the touch of the Holy Spirit could go so long without admitting to a single instance of fallacy. Sure, he started a few wars, but the magic is that when this current guy, who doesn't even look like most people (am I right, wink wink nudge nudge *dog whistle*), came into office he automatically became responsible for everything that happened previously. Well, not the good stuff, only the bad stuff. Only a Luddite doesn't know that Muslims born in Kenya have the power to time travel and start wars, only to blame them on the honorable white Christian knight known as W.

FYI Brittany, the main story on Drudge right now is a story about McDonalds hiring 50k people. I'm sure you and Richard could spin some right conspiracy out of that if you were to put your heads together.

I surely hope you haven't been able to pass on the stupid gene that seems to run in your family. The good news is since you are such a moron, you'd be hard-pressed to find anyone that could actually put up with your idiocy for more than 3 minutes at a time. 8^)

They are biased, but not left or right as you would argue. Traditionally, media has been biased in favor of the admin in power. They pretty much take for granted what they get from St. Dept. or other sources in the administration.

There was a study recently in this vein. Will see if I can locate it for you. I know you love to read more than blurbs online, right?

God.Paul Ryan. You know: Hero to movement Repubs, the guy with the federal budget. That one.

My point is that initially commentators of all stripes said that Ryan was a serious, high-minded guy capable of some thoughtful budget work.Turns out not to be the case, yet the lib and conservative pundits fell for it.

Duh factor: giant sites like CBS and Yahoo etc that Drudge links to are not biased one way or the other.