News
outlets all over America have repeatedly announced the government story
that Navy SEALS recently killed Al Qaeda terrorist leader Osama bin
Laden in a palatial “safe house” in Pakistan. But, of course,
government photos of the dead bin Laden will not be released to the
public for fear of inciting animosity among bin Laden’s militant
Muslim followers--as if the announcement that he had been killed wouldn’t
be enough to enrage them! And, furthermore, the body of bin Laden was
quickly buried at sea out of “respect” for Muslim tradition
that one has a speedy burial. But no mention is made, of course, as
to why his body could not have been buried. Were all nearby cemeteries
filled? And the question, “Why were the rest of the dead bodies
of the other Muslims who were killed in the raid also not buried at
sea?” has neither been asked nor answered. The media simply keeps
regurgitating the announcement that Navy SEALS killed bin Laden. And,
of course, the one thing a burial at sea accomplishes is it circumvents
any attempt by independent sources to confirm the true identity of bin
Laden via a post burial examination.

Is
Osama bin Laden really dead? I don’t think there is any question
about it. In fact, bin Laden has been dead for several years. If readers
will recall, this is the latest of several announcements by various
government spokesmen that Osama bin Laden left the land of the living.
As respected researcher Joel Skousen notes in his latest World Affairs
Brief, no less than 9 public announcements of bin Laden’s demise
have been made spanning the years 2001-2009.

For
example, on January 18, 2002, the Pakistani President declared, “I
think now, frankly, he [bin Laden] is dead.”

In
October 2002, Afghan President Hamid Karzai told CNN, “I would
come to believe that [bin Laden] probably is dead.”

In
November of 2005, Senator Harry Reid revealed that he was told Osama
may have died in October of that year.

In
September of 2006, French intelligence leaked a report suggesting Osama
had died in Pakistan.

In
March of 2009, noted military and intelligence analyst Angelo Codevilla
stated, “All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive
today than Osama bin Laden.”

And
in May of 2009, Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari said, “I’ve
said before that he [bin Laden]--I don’t think he’s alive.”
He also said the head of US intelligence told him they [the US] hadn’t
heard from Osama bin Laden in 7 years so they presumed him dead.”

Skousen
also points out the fact that it is unfathomable that bin Laden could
have remained alive and hiding out in caves and primitive safe houses
for an extended period of time, because it was a well known fact that
he suffered from acute kidney disease that required almost daily usage
of a dialysis machine (which was NOT present in the home where the US
government claimed he was shot). US intelligence personnel surely knew
that bin Laden was treated at the American Hospital in Dubai in July
of 2001 by Dr. Terry Callaway, and that CIA station chief Larry Mitchell
met bin Laden in the hospital during the time he was admitted. In fact,
French television and the Agence France Presse reported that bin Laden
was hospitalized between July 4th and 14th of that year.

I
certainly do not doubt that Navy SEALS killed someone during that raid.
In all likelihood, it was a bin Laden look-alike who had outlived his
usefulness. The official story of the raid has changed so many times
and has so many holes in it, it is an embarrassment to the US national
press corps that they have carried the story “as is” in
such a careless and unprofessional manner. But, then again, the national
press corps has been little more than a national propaganda machine
for the federal government for decades, anyway. So, why should this
story be any different?

Advertisement

At
this point, I encourage readers to check
out the following report that chronicles some of the more obvious
discrepancies and laughable explanations of the government’s official
story (or more appropriately, stories).

So,
the obvious question that needs to be asked is, “What is to be
gained by the announcement of this raid in which Osama bin Laden was
supposedly killed?”

For
one thing, this is going to make it extremely difficult for Republicans
to beat President Barack Obama in the 2012 elections. Immediately following
the raid’s announcement, Obama’s approval rating soared
by almost 25 percentage points. And with an extremely weak GOP Presidential
field (believe it or not, Republican Congressman Ron Paul actually fares
better head-to-head against Obama than any other Republican candidate--but
the Powers That Be (PTB) within the propaganda media and the GOP establishment
will do everything in their power to prevent Paul from gaining the nomination),
the “bin Laden factor” makes Obama almost unbeatable. As
Skousen astutely asked, how many terrorists have Gingrich, Palin, or
Huckabee killed?

However,
the thing that benefits the most from this raid is America’s emerging
police state, which is now strategically positioned to take another
giant leap forward.

With
bin Laden now declared “dead,” the US government will have
to find another excuse to continue the “War On Terrorism.”
Will US forces now pull out of Afghanistan? Not on your life! Literally!
US forces are permanently embedded in the Middle East. They are never
coming home. In fact, the US 2nd Marine Division is on alert for an
insertion into Libya, and US attacks against Syria are soon to follow.

All
the PTB need now is another 9/11-style attack, and the architects that
are drawing up plans for America becoming a Gestapo-style police state
will be free to launch their evil machinations almost at will. And revenge
for the death of bin Laden will be the reason provided to the American
public that will convince them to accept this next round of attacks
against the Bill of Rights and America’s liberties.

While
Americans are rejoicing over the death of Osama bin Laden, they need
to be infuriated at the death of America, because that is what this
so-called “War on Terror” is accomplishing.

Subscribe
to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter
Your E-Mail Address:

P.S.
For the month of May, I am making three of my most popular video messages
available at a special package price: “What Every Christian Should
Know About The New World Order,” “There Is A Conspiracy,”
and “The Biblical Standard Of Government.” During the month
of May, these three video messages may be purchased for the price of
two.That’s like buying two and getting one free. To take advantage
of this special offer, go
here.

*If
you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial
opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit
card, check, or Money Order. Use
this link.

Chuck
Baldwin is a syndicated columnist, radio broadcaster, author, and pastor
dedicated to preserving the historic principles upon which America was
founded. He was the 2008 Presidential candidate for the Constitution Party.
He and his wife, Connie, have 3 children and 8 grandchildren. Chuck and
his family reside in the Flathead Valley of Montana. See
Chuck's complete bio here.