On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> If it's really bugging people, we can try to get an errata in, but I suspect the wording is going to be tricky, and likely quite verbose.
It's not bugging me.
That being said, what about the reasonably opaque "implementors who
can reasonably expect some of their users to use Tor-enabled services
[and/or to use .onion addresses by accident] etc. pp." as a middle
ground?
Richard