Postflop: If he likes to float flops (and I would recommend revisiting that note) why not ck/call the turn? Let him take a stab.

Since I'm playing without hud my notes are just small directions. From time to time I do play my lines which are based on this (like this hand) but not always. Here we have second pair and there are some draws that might call + sometime he might even call with 77-99 (optimistically but it can happen).

I don't like c/c since he might bet again on the R and I might do some questionable calls because I have a feeling he's bluffing me (again, not consistent: tight reg bluffing, not so likely on NL10 but that was my fear).

Postflop: If he likes to float flops (and I would recommend revisiting that note) why not ck/call the turn? Let him take a stab.

Since I'm playing without hud my notes are just small directions. From time to time I do play my lines which are based on this (like this hand) but not always. Here we have second pair and there are some draws that might call + sometime he might even call with 77-99 (optimistically but it can happen).

I don't like c/c since he might bet again on the R and I might do some questionable calls because I have a feeling he's bluffing me (again, not consistent: tight reg bluffing, not so likely on NL10 but that was my fear).

Tnx

Yes, what I meant by that is that you should make sure that what he did was a float.

Ex: he called a J94 flop with KQ and then bet the turn when checked to. This shows a float with a gutshot and two overs.

Him calling with a draw like flush and checking back is not a float.

So I just want to make sure that we have that down right.

Because you are going here based on a read: he floats. Floating implies that he calls hands to take the pot away later on and since we have a bluffcatcher we should let him do just that (again based on the read). However, since villain is nittier (tight reg) I would not think that he floats that light and I would look to bet turn and ck/fold river.