It doesn't keep our cities safe; it doesn't educate our children; and
it doesn't care for our sick. It just doesn't.

It would be nice to imagine a world in which it didbut it doesn't.
It never has, it never will, and no amount of pushing, cajoling, or
tinkering will change that fact.

Post-September 11, it should be tragically apparent to even the dimmest
bulb that government is utterly ineffectual at protecting anything,
least of all human lives. Indeed, it was immoral government edict that
both incited the September 11 terrorists and made it possible for them to
murder thousands of individual.

Anyone in 2003 who still clings to the notion that government can solve
their problems for them is simply sticking their fingers in their ears,
closing their eyes, and chanting, "Government will solve my problems,
government will solve my problems, government will solve my problems!"
at the top of their lungsin obvious denial of objective reality.

Government doesn't work. It's time to finally accept this and find
something else that does. Fortunately, that something already exists.
It's working fantastically, considering the constraints under which it
operatesspecifically the active opposition of virtually every
elected official in the country.

That something? Individual liberty.

Without millions of elected officials and bureaucrats actively working
to subvert your liberty, we'd be far more prosperous than we can
imagine. Consider:

Regardless of how wealthy or poor you are, regardless of your marginal
tax rate, government at all levels stealsthat's right, steals,
there's no other accurate termforty-seven percent of your money?
Through direct taxation (income tax, property tax), indirect taxation
(sales tax), and hidden taxation (gasoline tax, "sin" tax, etc), you
must work until nearly the end of June just to satisfy government's
demands.

What do your various governments do with that money? No matter who you
are, it's not what you want done with it.

If you're a Liberal (correct terminology: socialist), the Conservatives
squandered it on too much defense, the rich, or stopping a noble social
project. If you're Conservative (correct terminology: fascist), the
Liberals squandered it on some hair-brained junk science project or a
crucifix in urine or on keeping the poor dependent on government.

Only the anarcho-capitalist libertarians have it right: government
stole the money and used it to justify their own existence while in the
process harming everyone.

How many people think they get value received from their government?
The number is so tiny as to be statistically insignificant. By its very
nature, government cannot give value received. It cannot even
approximate value received.

What would you do with twice the spending money you currently have?
Start a business? Invest? Put your kids through college? Give to your
favorite charity? Stay home and raise your children while your spouse
works?

If I could spend all the money I made, I'd do all that and moreand
what's more, only a tiny, statistically insignificant percentage of
individuals in the United States would be poor.

"But," you say, "you're particularly generous! Not everyone will be
like you and we'll have people starving in the street!

To that, I say, "Rubbish! Americans are the most generous and
prosperous people in the world! Each of us currently shells out half of
our earnings to Unconstitutional government 'charities' that perform
little or no charity work. Imagine if each of us gave one percent of
our gross income to our church or other true charity. There wouldn't
be a poor person left!"

The real objection to voluntarily donating money private charities
money rather than seeing it stolen by government functionaries is that
it would force all the millions of parasites currently in government
employ to actually go out and work for a living.

All our social and political ills would get solved overnight. All those
who currently have power on the strength of an all-powerful (but inept)
central government would have to find real work for a change.

And that frightens the hell out of them.

Want to know why we're starting to see terrorist activities on American
soil? Why more than fifty percent of respondents in a recent Gallup
poll believe that governments present an immediate threat to American
freedom? Why the Militia Movement has become so popular and is now
gearing itself to defend Americans against tyrannical government
intrusion?

Because governmentsparticularly the United States Federal
governmentdo pose an immediate threat to the freedoms we've always
enjoyed.

As this threat becomes more and more obvious, the lunatic fringe begins
to react in unpredictable ways. The average person reacts to the Federal
government's bloody murder of the Weaver family and the immolation of
the Branch Davidians with shock, disgust, and fear. Those who know the
facts in these cases clamor for justice.

A lunatic reacts by filling a truck full of fuel oil and fertilizer and
blowing up a Federal building.

As the Federal government commits more atrocities and crushes more
American freedoms under its tyrannical boot, we'll see more lunatic
terrorism by the unbalanced.

This is not to condone bloodshed, but to state a fact: some people are
a little crazy.

Take, for example, some of the homeless people you see muttering to
themselves on street corners in Chicago, where I lived the majority of
the 1990s. They're obviously suffering from some grade of mental
illness; if you just leave them alone, they're fairly harmless. Intrude
too far into their private world, and some of them will react violently.

That's what's happening right now. The Federal government has started
to push people. Some of the ones who should be left alone are reacting
violently.

The rest of us simply wonder when our turn to be pushed will come
and how we'll react when it happens.

In general, Americans just want to be left the hell alone to live our
lives as it pleases us. When we're allowed to do so (as was the case
prior to the early part of the 20th century), you find that we're
fairly peaceful. We have their vices and ills, but as Utopia is not one
of the options, we cope and survive as well as they can.

The American Federal government was clearly and specifically formed
with severe restrictions on what it could do. During the 20th century,
the major political parties quietly colluded to ignore these
restrictions. Now, at the dawn of the 21st century, the FedGov is now
involved in activities that are so obviously and undeniably beyond the
scope of its power that no American is truly able to be left alone to
live as it pleases him or her.

In the shadow of Bloody Tuesday, the FedGov has actively begun its
conversion of the country into a banana republic police state.

At the very least, fifty percent of what we earn is confiscated by
governments. If you think there's no link between economic liberty and
personal liberty, then you're a fool. Our would-be slaveholders
(government functionaries at all levels) tell us they're doing it for
the best of reasons: "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the
few," we are told.

In reality, they could care less about anyone's needs but their own.
Beyond a local level, government functionaries do not get into the game
for any reason other than to increase their personal power.

If you doubt this, ask yourself one question: what happened to all the
lofty goals of the Republican "revolutionaries" of 1994?

Subverted to the cause of increasing their personal power, that's what.

The root of any government is raw, naked forceand some people will
never submit.

The government will be forced to kill themand the FedGov has
already brutally murdered at least two sets of dissidents. Never mind
that most of us wouldn't want Randy Weaver or the Branch Davidians as
neighbors. There's no evidence that they were hurting anyone, they were
just politically threatening.

Their murders had the full support of both the Democratic and
Republican Parties. This should tell you everything you need to know
about the supposed "differences" between them. When push comes to
shove, there is no difference.

I'm a philosophical libertarian. I believe that no human being has the
rightunder any circumstancesto initiate force against another
human being, nor to threaten or delegate its initiation.

That includes individuals in government. In fact, it most especially
includes individuals in government. Indeed, the moment you cede control
of any kind to government is the moment you'd headed down the path to
tyranny.

There are individuals who believe government can be limited, that by
prescribing strict bounds for it, the individuals drawn to it will
never seek additional power. While this is an interesting notion, in
all of human history, government power has never been permanently
curbed.

Having "a little government" is precisely identical to being "a little
pregnant." At first, it doesn't show. After a while, it gets a little
bigger. Ultimately, it causes a lot of unavoidable painand never
really goes away for the rest of your life.

Government in this country has become like the parasitic 35-year-old
son living in his parents' basement. They can ignore him, they can
pretend he doesn't exist, but ultimately it's clear that the only thing
he's doing is sucking away their money and providing precious little in
return.

What do you do with such a government? The same thing you do with a
recalcitrant child: you kick it out. Except in the case of government,
there's no reason to ever check on its progress from time to time.

No human being has the rightunder any circumstancesto initiate
force against another human being, nor to threaten or delegate its
initiation. The moment an individual grasps this concept is the moment
he begins the process of kicking out the parasitic child.

William Stone, III is a computer nerd (RHCE, CCNP,
CISSP) and Executive Director of the Zero Aggression Institute
(http://www.0ap.org). He seeks the
Libertarian Party's nomination for the 2004 Senate race in South Dakota.