March 08, 2005

Colorado Vacation Ideas

Visiting the lovely state of Colorado soon? I mean, really soon? Then don't forget to plan a visit with the frozen dead guy.

Over the last three years, the cryogenically frozen body of a Norwegian
man has become the centerpoint of a quirky winter festival in a small
Colorado mining town.

"Grandpa" Bredo Morstoel, who died in 1989, was frozen by his
grandson and stored in a shed in Nederland, a town 35 miles northwest
of Denver that began celebrating "Frozen Dead Guy Days" in 2002 to
increase tourism.

Free Music

If
you know what South by Southwest (SXSW for those in the know) is and if
you continually wish you could head to the festival and take in all the
tunes, this news is for you. The event organizers have put together 2.6
gigs worth of downloadable music from the artists who will be playing
the festival.

2.6 gigs (750 songs) worth of legal, free, alternative music of all stripes.

The file has been seeded as a BitTorrent file, so you'll need a
client to download the file. The upside is that their site never gets
bogged down by the extra traffic of having thousdands of music fans
trying to download huge music files from their site.

Find out more here. They also have a handy link to the BitTorrent site so you can find a client to suit your needs.

Before We Get On With the Day...

...I'd just like to note three things:

The new site is pretty much done. The CSS needs adjusting to make
the colors a little more harmonious, but that won't stop me from
launching the thing. It goes live tonight after I distribute the keys
to all the authors.

I should probably apologize to everyone who has been scarred by the half-nekkid Steve, but...

...dang, y'all keep coming to see the half-nekkid Steve, so apparently the scarring is that bad.

March 07, 2005

Men of the Blogosphere: This One's for the Ladies

Since Playgirl editor-in-chief, Michele Zipp, has outed herself as a Republican,
can a Conservative Men of the Blogosphere special issue be far behind?
While I would be far too shy, pale, and rotund to make the cut, I'm
betting Jeff G and Steve Green would step up to the plate.

Or do you think that might be a little too special interest? We Photoshop, you decide.

(And, yes, I'll be mildly disturbed by this image for a few days, too. Although Steve does cut a rather striking figure...)

American Idol, Men's Night

Except for McGehee, you all come here for American Idol updates, don't you? Or, perhaps, to mock me for my bad taste in entertainment?

Whatever the reason (or, for that matter, even if you feel like
boycotting me) I have once again found myself diving head first into
the morass of America's best karaoke singers that is American Idol.
There is one good thing about my passive obsession this year: there are
two singers who actually seem a little out of the norm for the contest.

Everyone is referring to them as the "rockers," although I think
that's doing a bit of disservice to the genre. These are Geoff Tate
style vocalists or James Hetfield growlers. Read, hard core rock
has always been less about pure singing talent and more about the
ability to emote. The first "rocker," Constantine, sounds and looks
(minus the genre-defining hair) like he would have been happy heading
up Poison back in the latter days of metal. The other, Bo, reminds us
more of a 70's throwback--a "Freebird" singing southern rocker.

While I don't consider either of these guys to be "rock" in any real
sense, I do like that they've differentiated themselves from the crowd.

Scott Savol He has a fine (actually, a good)
voice, but a horrible, charmless presence. He might actually make it as
a session singer in the industry, but don't imagine that he could put
his face on a record and sell it to hundreds of thousands of teenage
girls. Won't happen.

Bo Bice He goes for a more current song and it
doesn't suit him. The song doesn't let him stretch his vocals the way
he needs to because, frankly, he isn't that good of a singer. When he
attacks a song, he has a decent growl and a nice sound, but when he has
to hold himself back he comes across as wavery and thin. It finished
better than it started, but it started pretty poor. Paula and Simon
loved it, but I think they're just trying to influence the voters. Just
sayin'...

Anthony Federov Squeaky clean little boy. That's
what I think every time I see him--a harmless, talented, somewhat
typical kid who those teen girls (who stayed away in droves from Scott
Savol) would absolutely adore. Perfect for the competition because of
that, useless to me because it's kind of boring. I can't imagine that
he won't be there pretty close to the end.

An Aside Do those Burger King Bacon Cheddar Ranch ads bother anyone but me? I mean, they're like little sex ads. Strangely disturbing.

Nikko Smith I love the song "Georgia On My Mind,"
and I liked him singing it at least part of the time. There were some
seriously rough moments, though. He's got great range for a karaoke
singer, but he doesn't have the control to pull off a song like that.

Travis Tucker He danced, he sang, he even did a
little beatbox. He's a better performer than he is a singer, but he'll
be another one that connects with the all important teen girl market.
Not particularly good, but I wouldn't be surprised to see him stay in
the competition.

Mario Vazquez He reminds me of nothing less than
another Anthony Fedorov only better at being pretty and worse at the
being a singer. There were some truly painful moments during his
rendition of "How Can You Mend a Broken Heart"--a song that can
actually be quite affecting with the right vocals. Simon is right:
he'll sail through on charm.

Constantine Maroulis Ooo, tackling the Police.
Great song--and a nice change from all the typical pop fodder.
Unfortunately for Constantine, he looks lost on the stage and his voice
is a pale little thing next to Sting's. He doesn't sound good at all.
He's trying to get by on his looks, but I don't think it's going to
keep him in the competition. Randy liked it, Paula loved it (but she's
pretty much loving everyone tonight), and Simon was the only voice of
reason. To his co-judges: "You guys have lost the plot."

An Aside During this commercial break, I'm
listening to "Rock Dove" by the Earthlings? (The question mark being
part of the band's name, should I put a period after that question
mark?) I feel a little bit better.

Anwar Robinson My girlfriend likes him as much for
his looks as for his friendly personality. Well, maybe more for his
looks. His "What a Wonderful World" is probably painfully typical for
the show, at least in song choice and style, but still gorgeous. His
voice is actually much better than most of the others tonight, and his
stage persona isn't too cloying bringing just a minimum of gesturing
and pose. I liked it a lot. Very good performance; he has good reason
to feel good about himself tonight.

Strings for the Deaf, The String Quartet Tribute to Queens of the Stone Age

Compulsive purchases are so often wrong that I nearly put this one back on the shelf. I'm glad I didn't.

Following in the footsteps of Apocalyptica,
this string quartet transforms the music of a hard rock band into
something resembling chamber music. Queens of the Stone Age, the
world's most famous stoner rock band, is best known for their bouncy
pop rock song, "No One Knows," and have been making sludgy heavy metal
music for years.

Nope...

Ward Churchill: It Only Gets Worse

I
had been leaning toward supporting the firing of Ward Churchill for his
writing and comments concerning 9/11. The more I learned about
him--from the situation surrounding his hiring at CU to the
fast-tracking of his tenure regardless of academic achievement--only
served to buttress my opinion. Now, Dan Caplis And Craig Silverman, in
the Rocky Mountain News, have put me solidly in the "fire him" camp.

An extended quote:

Churchill stands credibly accused of ethnic fraud, grade retribution,
falsification of the nature of his military service, academic fraud,
plagiarism, selling other artists' creations as his own and falsely
accusing Denver Post columnist Diane Carman of inventing incendiary
quotations.

All this provides ample justification for termination pursuant to
accusations of incompetence and lack of integrity. But it is
Churchill's instructions on violence that demand immediate suspension
followed by termination. Due process must be provided, but unless this
accused can somehow suppress his own statements, he should ultimately
lose his job.

Here is what Churchill preaches: The U.S. is fascist and Nazi-like.
Genocide has been and continues to be perpetrated by our government
here and abroad. America was illegally colonized by non-natives who now
should be killed (One example of him saying this: "Killing the
colonizer is a figurative proposition, it is a literal proposition, but
either way, and by all available means, the proposition has to be
fulfilled.")

Ward Churchill must go. Colorado's embarrassment grows with every day that Churchill remains on the payroll.

Random Heresy II

While
I like the Harry Potter series of books, I haven't liked the movies.
Most of the characters irritate, and while the special effects are
generally excellent, the stories tend toward the repetitive. And,
frankly, somehow the book versions come across as even shallower
versions of what I consider to be light entertainment.

The only things that help redeem the movies, aside from gorgeous
visuals, are Alan Rickman's Professor Snape and Robbie Coltrane's
Hagrid, mostly in that order. And while we're on the subject of Snape,
how is it that Harry and crew remain such devoted enemies of Snape, who
has actually proved his willingness to protect the sniveling little
Harry on more than one occasion? Sure Snape is a bit of a jerk, but,
let's be honest, if you were teaching the precious little Harry
wouldn't the lad grind on you, too?

I'll still enjoy the books as what they are--a few nights' mindless entertainment--but the don't count me as a fan of the films.

Network Problem

Okay,
I got home, sat down to check my favorite bloggers, news sites, and
stuff, and found a problem. I couldn't get to any of the mu.nu sites or
Instapundit. That wasn't that big of a deal--occasional network issues
happen to everyone, right?

Then I couldn't get to Dean, Michelle, or news.google.com.

Huh. I tried some of my other favorite sites and found a good number of them not loading.

Okay, Network Utility, here I come. Pinging Instapundit works just
fine, but trying to load it in my browser on either the laptop or the
desktop fails. Okay, how about a traceroute? Traceroute fails ugly.
After 10 hops (when it reaches newnet-2.border1.sjepnap.net (the IP is
66.151.157.146)), it just flounders around trying to find a route, but
failing.

What is the network problem (that has persisted from early this afternoon until now--at least five hours)?

Okay, whatever your theory might be, let me throw in a little
wrench: pinging Dean and the traceroute to Dean both work, but loading
the site still fails.

Now, for the worst part, while I can get to resurrectionsong and all the sites associated with this server, I can't get to sites that I'm working on that reside on another server with the same hosting company.

March 04, 2005

Consider the Birds

Sooner or later, I'll get around to writing a proper review, but for now I'll just suggest that you run out and get Woven Hand's Consider the Birds.
That is, of course, assuming you can find it; it took me the better
part of a weekend to find a local store that had the CD in stock.

The quickest way to describe the music: Country inflected, glowering, powerful music with an omnipresent Christian message.

A little more explanation: this is the, mostly, solo project from 16 Horsepower's David Eugene Edwards--a fire and brimstone singer that captures a kind of music that you're unlikely to hear in any other release.

Extremely popular in parts of Europe--and everything that Britney Spears is not. Namely, talented, unique, and relevant.

As a note: for Denver fans, Woven hand will be playing Bender's Tavern on the 25th of this month. I plan to be there--once I figure out where Bender's Tavern is...

Moderate Conservative Manifesto

Rae has posted a series of political stances that define a sort of moderate conservative manifesto. It hits everything from education to abortion, and foreign policy to prayer in school. Give her your thoughts.

March 02, 2005

ResurrectionSong: Help Wanted

I
have Expression Engine installed and I've begun setting it up in hopes
of making the transition to the new software next week. The next two
steps in getting the site ready will be creating accounts for the
current authors of this site and then preparing a new template for EE.
Following that, I will attempt to import all of the entries from
MT--and, if that works, I'll kill off the archived files between
AfricaBlog and ResurrectionSong.

I've decided that I will happily sacrifice my search engine stats in
hopes of simplifying my life and solving the problem of comment spam.

Which leads me to the recruitment drive. I will be creating accounts
for Don and Jerry, but I would love to open the doors to new writers.
If you would like to contribute to ResurrectionSong, these are the
requirements:

You have to either be a regular commenter on this site or be
willing to submit a sample of your writing. While my writing isn't what
anyone would consider great, one thing that I've been proud of is the
overall tone and ability of the writing on this site.

You have to possess an open mind and a willingness to be
challenged. I will be giving authors the authority to ban commenters
from the site, but that is, ahem, the nuclear option. If you want to
state your opinion just so that other people can agree with you, then
you're missing the point of this blog. I encourage the conversation
that happens when any number of reasonable people decide to disagree
politely.

I would prefer to welcome new voices--that is, people who
don't have their own blogs--to the group. I will, however, consider
other bloggers who can make a convincing case as to why they would fit
in well at ResurrectionSong.

This will be an ongoing recruitment drive, but if you want to be
approved and writing when the new EE-driven site is launched next week,
get your request in now.

Email me (zombyboy -at- resurrectionsong -dot- com) with all the
relevant information and the request. If I agree that you'll be a good
fit, I'll send you the login and password information.

Diversity of thought counts as does diversity of experience. I would
love to have a regular female voice, for example; this isn't because I
want to fill a quota but because the difference in life experience will
bring a different kind of view and voice to the site.

All I Can Do...

...is add a hearty "Amen!" and a somewhat redundant link to this celebration of beauty.
Since it's been linked by both Instapundit and NRO's Corner, y'all have
probably seen it. But I'd hate for someone to miss the pictures.

Re-Enfranchisement for Felons

Shawn
Macomber suggests re-enfranchisement for felons in an article today,
and I find myself disagreeing. Maybe. I started considering it during
this last election cycle, and I still haven't found what I consider to
be a solid answer.

Close to five million Americans are currently barred from voting
because of felony convictions. Of this number, nearly two million have
completely paid their debt to society in the form of time served behind
bars, parole, and probation. There is no legitimate moral argument for
denying those who have regained their status as free citizens through
public penance the most basic right of a citizen.

He then goes on to note that one of the reasons people on the right
oppose re-enfranchisement of felons is that they will form a large, new
block of Democrats. That's a reasonable assumption, although the
assumption that they will actually vote in numbers large enough to make
a difference is arguable. Either way, opposition on those grounds is
unreasonable. I object for an entirely different reason: not every class of citizen in the United States has the same rights (even with regards to voting) as every other class of voter.

Minors, for example, have an abbreviated set of rights, and curbs
are placed on the political activity of active military personnel.
Former sex offenders often have restrictions placed on them that aren't
placed on other criminals. Shawn acknowledges this, to some extent,
when noting that felons are restricted from gun ownership (which, I
agree, has dubious value and cause in the case of non-violent
offenders).

There is a reason for each set of curbs: minors aren't trusted with
more than an abbreviated set of rights because they haven't yet reached
that somewhat arbitrary age where we believe that they should have the
education, maturity, and social knowledge to make their votes
reasonable and well-considered. Even at the age of majority, though,
they can't drinking alcohol or run for some public offices. Though they
have done nothing wrong, these non-minor citizens are excluded from
certain practices that are open to older citizens.

The question is what is it that we achieve by pushing felons out of
that most basic, active level of participation? From my point of view,
felons (in a broad and sweeping sense) have exhibited that
extraordinary level of bad judgment that leaves in question their
ability to be constructive voters. They may have paid their debt, but
they have also set themselves apart by their actions.

Put it this way: while it isn't stated explicitly at sentencing, I
consider the curbs on rights to be a part of the punishment of felons.
It's part of the package of committing a crime bad enough to be labeled
a felony: you go to jail, you complete parole, you get to be free and
have a job and take part in life again, but you don't get to vote.

I don't, unlike Shawn, believe that this is dehumanizing the entire
class of citizens. I think it's just due diligence. That is, when trust
is broken it isn't repaired with a prison sentence. If a check forger
completes his sentence, would it be wise to give him employment in a
bank? The crime continues to matter beyond the prison sentence. This
isn't an attempt to make monsters of every felon, but simply saying
that there is a reasonable skepticism that has to be factored into the
argument.

If I could leave it at that, then I would probably be comfortable.
The problem comes when you start considering what constitutes a felony.

But a felony is not what it once was in America, as is made painfully
obvious by the 600 percent jump in incarceration rates over the last 30
years. Indeed, it can and should be argued that a standard which
permanently disenfranchises anyone who commits a non-violent felony --
of which there are now legion -- is cruel and unusual. Can any
reasonable person say a non-violent drug offender should have his
voting rights curtailed for the rest of his life? How about someone who
once wrote a series of bad checks? Or even on the violent end of
things, once engaged in an ill advised bar fight? Are we really ready
to tell these people no matter what they do they can never be trusted
by society again? That there is no way to reform after even a minor
youthful indiscretion?

Hyperbolically screaming, opponents of re-enfranchisement for
ex-felons make monsters out of men, because it lends easy justification
to an abridgement of rights that would not hold up under individual
scrutiny. The truth is, the real monsters are largely either still in
jail or under onerous probation requirements and will not likely be
able to vote anytime soon. It's high time the rest of these men and
women who have served their time are released from the caricature. The
punishment does not fit the crime, and no matter which way it is spun,
permanent disenfranchisement will never be compatible with a just
society.

And here's where I think he might be right. I don't know that it's
supportable to think that "the real monsters are largely either still
in jail or under onerous probation requirement," but it's reasonable to
argue that we've criminalized things like drug offenses to the point
that what constitutes a felony today is a far cry from what constituted
a felony at the birth of our nation.

Our booming prison population is something that leaves me
uncomfortable even outside the boundaries of this conversation; in the
context of re-enfranchisement, it takes on an even more important role.
Examining voting rights in relation to the changes we've made to our
judicial system is not only reasonable, it's necessary.

I don't remain entirely convinced that re-enfranchisement is the
right answer, but I am moved to address the issue again. Is any
one-size fits all solution right or is their room for consideration of
individual cases or new guidelines (as I think there should be in
relation to gun ownership)?

Comments Will Be Down Again (Updated)

I'll be changing the comment script again in the morning. Apologies for any inconvenience.

I've purchased Expression Engine and will be working to put that
software in place and archiving all of the current content. Once I have
the installation in place and the look and feel ported over to the EE
engine, I will happily switch over to the new software.

MT has been good to me, and I have no complaints. For what was a free piece of software, it served me exceptionally well.

See y'all in the morning.

Update: The comments should be working on the front page again and I am currently rebuilding the archives.

American Idol, Further Down the Slope (Updated)

Lindsey Cardinale Fun, extremely cute, lively, and
singing crap I wouldn't pay a penny for personally. Oddly, I kind of
like the song selection, though, because it stands out from the normal,
whiny, breathy stuff we hear on this show. Not bad.

Jessica Sierra Someone tell her to stop trying so
hard to be sexy. It's just sort of embarassing. The come-hither look
makes me want to go somewhere other than hither. Wherever hither might
be. Her voice truly bores me--it's typical, without character, and
without charisma. Decent karaoke, but nothing better. As a question:
does it sound that much different in the studio? Because the judges
were drooling over her...

Mikalah Gordon I've despised this irritating,
nasally-voiced little bimbo from the beginning. Tonight's performance,
all fake emoting and over-done theatricality, did nothing to change my
mind. Please, make her go away. Please. The judges, of course, liked
it. This seems to be the way my night is going.

Celena Rae The most attractive of the contestants
in my world. Unfortunately, that doesn't mean she should be singing in
front of anyone. She wasn't particularly good. But, oh my freakin' God, is she gorgeous.

Nadia Turner The second most attractive of the
group. I generally enjoy her singing, too, but tonight was a bit off.
Bad song choice hurt her here: too much woah-woah and not enough
emotion. Which is a shame because she has a wonderful stage presence
and a solid voice. Not her best night.

Amanda Avila I didn't like it. The tempo was there,
she's a decent performer, but it just wasn't there for me. Not the
worst of the night, but not something that I'll remember tomorrow,
either.

Janay Castine I actually kind of liked it--even
though I haven't been a fan of her, I'm not a fan of the song, and I
don't think she has the best voice. Figure it out, because I can't.

Carrie Underwood Back to boring. Nothing about this
woman stands out to me in a good way or a bad way; she just blends into
the background. Boring boring boring.

Vonzell Solomon To be polite, let's simply say that I don't know how she's still in the show.

Defining the Beginning of Life

Doug
Allen provides a pro-abortion argument that will probably leave both
the pro-choice side and the pro-life side a little disappointed. That's
because he doesn't couch the argument in terms of religion or in terms
of absolute rights. Instead, he takes a crack at defining the starting
point of a life in a medical sense.

You might disagree with him (from either side of the argument), but
the thought that went into his assertion is solid. Given that I support
my own opposition to abortion in the thought that I don't know where
life actually begins, and I believe that were are better when we err on
the side of protecting life, this is actually a direct assault on my
position. He's tossed the gauntlet, in a sense: this is when life begins, now argue the point.

Before I can argue it, I have to give it fair consideration, but I do appreciate the line of attack.

Intriguing Use of Technology (Cross Posted at AfricaBlog)

I'm
often skeptical of claims that high tech is a great boon to developing
nations in Africa. The problem of initial cost of deployment is often
handled by a donor nation, but the upkeep and survivability of the
technology is another question entirely. That is, if there is no one
locally that can handle maintenance and updates, precisely how useful
is a bank of computers when they suffer from some malady?

That's why I generally think that books are better than computers,
if you take my meaning. But the geek in me can't help but enjoy seeing
technology being used in innovative ways--and given that Kenya remains
one of the healthier nations in Sub-Saharan Africa, the issues of
maintenance and equipment survival become less pressing.

At the Mbita Point primary school in western Kenya students click away at a handheld computer with a stylus.

They are doing exercises in their school textbooks which have been digitised.

It is a pilot project run by EduVision, which is looking at ways to
use low cost computer systems to get up-to-date information to students
who are currently stuck with ancient textbooks.

Matthew Herren from EduVision told the BBC programme Go Digital how
the non-governmental organisation uses a combination of satellite radio
and handheld computers called E-slates.

"The E-slates connect via a wireless connection to a base station in
the school. This in turn is connected to a satellite radio receiver.
The data is transmitted alongside audio signals."

I hope that this pilot program works out; innovative and appropriate use of technology always excites me.

Because...

Euthanasia is No Defense (Updated)

So,
what level of misery is it where we decide that a person's life is no
longer worth living, that killing them is doing them a favor?

Everyone is living under a death sentence: my own end could come
today or tomorrow or sixty years from now. One thing is sure, though,
and that is that death will come. Everyone lives through times where
there doesn't seem to be an end to the pain, either physical or mental;
and, sometimes, mired in that pain, it's hard to imagine that life
could ever possibly be better.

Certainly, for some people, a quicker end is almost assured. A
seventy-year old man with lung cancer will probably pass on before I
do, as would a ten-year old with Hunter Syndrome. But the date of our
deaths is rarely certain, and a degenerative illness is never a free
pass for murder.

A father who admitted smothering his terminally ill son told police it was a "mercy killing", a court has heard.

Andrew Wragg denies murdering Jacob, 10, who had the degenerative
condition Hunter Syndrome, on 24 July last year at their home in
Worthing, West Sussex.

It's a horrible thing to watch someone you love suffer. It's even more
horrible when it is a heavy burden of responsibility on your own
shoulders, as with a parent and child. Worse, though, is to murder your
own son and call it mercy.

Breaking News on Fox

Lebanon's government has resigned.

"I am keen that the government will not be a hurdle in front of those
who want the good for this country. I declare the resignation of the
government that I had the honor to head. May God preserve Lebanon,"
Karami said.

The curious thing will be to see what coalition of interests rises next to lead the Lebanese government.

The Music Industry: Work Hard to Screw Up A Good Thing

Some
days I wish the entire music industry would implode. I wish it would
just collapse in on itself, crushing all of the boy bands and whiny
little girls who sell sexuality to ten year olds. The wreckage would,
if we were lucky, take the Grammy's with it, giving us back a few hours
of our life every year. Time better spent with family or a good book.

Luckily, there are voices of reason at some of the bigger labels,
cautioning against the move. The truly ironic twist is that the reason
some of the labels want to raise prices is that they want to
"capitalise on burgeoning demand for legal online music." Of course, if
raising the prices actually cuts into sales, the profits will be
lost--and raising costs will curb enthusiasm for legal downloads.

The major, legal download sites have hit the sweet spot: the price
they charge is one that most people seem to be willing to pay, the
price lets the record industry tap into an emerging market that had
abandoned CD singles in favor of illegal downloads, and still allows
the retailers to recoup most costs or even make a small profit on each
download. Move the price much lower, and recouping costs becomes more
difficult, move the price higher and people will stop buying.

Think of it as the Laffer Curve of online music download economics.

If the push becomes reality, though, the pop music Armageddon might
just take a whole lot of bad bands with it--and allow a new,
forward-thinking industry to rise in its place. Imagine there's no
Britney; it isn't hard to do...

In Case You Were Wondering...

Of course, that's just cold stats that mean nothing without the
context of the friendships I've made, the shots I've drank, the quality
(or lack) in the writing, the arguments and conversations, the
wonderful crew of regular readers and commenters, the Screaming
Trees/Mark Lanegan obsession, and the groupies.

Okay, I made up the bit about the groupies. Still, the point stands:
although I remain skeptical of the blogosphere as an emergent media
voice, there is some reason I keep writing, commenting, and responding.
There's a mix of pleasure that I derive from writing, from being read,
and from being challenged that isn't answered anywhere else in my life.
I thank everyone who has played a constructive role in that, with
special thanks going to those people who I now consider friends and
those writers who have contributed both here and at AfricaBlog.

The next year of the blog will hopefully see an increase in quality.
I don't do resolutions, but if there were one for this situation it
would be to see something that I've written published and paid for in a
professional setting. A lesser goal, of course, is to finally get Instapundit and Steve Green to blogroll me.

Oh, and groupies. I plan to have more groupies, if possible.

Thanks for supporting me, reading me, propping me up on those
occasions when spam comments had me near blog-retirement, and for all
of the insightful commentary that you've all left on the site. It's
been an honor to be read and to feel respected for my opinions and my
thoughts.

Thank you.

Update: Thanks to Bryan for his well wishes and for linking this post. Trackbacks, being an art and not a science, don't always seem to work as well as might be expected...

The Academy Awards: Live Ignora-Blogging from ResurrectionSong

All
night long, I'll be ignoring the Oscars and talking about other stuff.
That's right, I don't know who will win Best Actress. I'm entirely
ignorant of which Actor might walk away with a big ol' pat on the back.
And, in fact, I'm not sure how much I care which movie wins Best
Picture.

So, join me all night long as we ignore the results from Hollywood,
as Chris Rock either does or doesn't offend the sensibilities of Middle
America. I won't be talking about who was dressed best (or worst) or
who was most obsequious and ingratiating in their acceptance speech.

Hooray for Hollywood! And a bigger hooray for the off button on my remote control.

PPS-We like Andy because he's clever.
And a trendsetter, too. Pretty soon, I predict that everyone will be
liveblogging the ignora-blogging of other blogs. You do want to be one
of the cool kids, don't you?

Soliciting Precisely What?

So,
here's the set-up. Imagine a seedy little man in a seedy little auto
pawnshop. Imagine a woman coming in to pawn her car and being told by
the seedy little man that he'll give her $1000 more for her car if she
shows him her breasts. Now, imagine that she takes the money and does
as he asks.

Before I go any further, let's establish two things: I believe that
prostitution should be legal and regulated by the state, and I further
believe that the seedy little man was behaving atrociously. On the
first, while I can't imagine ever going to a prostitute, I consider the
transaction between two adults to be, simply, a private contract
between two individuals. None of my business, but at least as worthy as
the food service industry of being regulated for health concerns. On
the second, the pawnshop employee is a cad, a jerk, an ass, and all
sorts of other words that you might choose to use in description.

Let's jump back to the story, shall we?

I first saw this story on the local Fox affiliate. The leaders in
the ads went something like this: "An employee at a local store asks a
woman to show him her breasts. Find out why he's not in jail." That's
paraphrasing big time from memory, folks, so forgive me if I'm not
absolutely accurate. I think you get the idea.

The news on Fox that night featured a woman, backlit so that her
face was obscured, telling a sad little tale of woe and depression.
It's here that she reveals that she took the money, she showed her
chest, and then she filed a complaint with the police. The worker was
arrested and later released and he will later have a court date over
the case (and other women have come forward with similar stories, at
least one who seemingly had sex with the man for a little extra cash on
her pawn).

Now, I want to pose a few questions:

First, who are these women angry with: the caddish worker for
offering cash for sexual gratification? Or are they just angry that
they were willing to shred their dignity for such a low price?

Second, what is the man being charged with? If there was any contact
involved, it doesn't sound that it was anything but consensual--that
is, the woman agreed that, for a fee, they would allow him to take
certain liberties. So, from that point of view, it can't be sexual
assault or rape. If it's a soliciting prostitution charge, then
shouldn't the women be facing charges for accepting the money? If the
charge is just making an indecent suggestion, then most drunks in bars
(both male and female, if my own experience is anything to go by) are
just as guilty as this guy--they just usually don't offer cash as an
inducement.

I'm sorry, but these women have no room for complaint. If they
didn't like the offer, they should've said no, but if the employee is
guilty, then it seems that they are just as guilty for their part in
the transaction.

The story may well be more convoluted than I know; there may be some
hidden offense that didn't make it into the news report. Unfortunately,
I haven't been able to find any details on either the Fox News site or
the two local newspapers.