Advertisement

A newfound species of lungless salamander from Arkansas seems to be sipping from a fountain of youth.

From the outside, the recently discovered Ouachita streambed salamander (Eurycea subfluvicola) looks like the larval form of a related species, the many-ribbed salamander (Eurycea multiplicata). But on the inside, the “remarkable” amphibian is obviously an adult, with a fully developed reproductive system, a new study says.

The phenomenon of adult organisms keeping a youthful appearance, called paedomorphism, is well known in nature. But E. subfluvicola is the most extreme example found in salamanders in more than 70 years, according to scientists, and the first ever found in Arkansas’ Ouachita Mountains (map).

Compared with its relative, the many-ribbed salamander, the new species has a shorter and narrower head; a flatter, longer snout; and darker, more depressed eyes. Most noticeably, the new salamander doesn’t have the trademark black stripe that runs down its relatives’ heads and noses, according to the study, published April 11 in the journal Zootaxa.

As with any animal family, it’s extremely rare to find a new species living “under the same rock” as its closest relative, said study co-author Mike Steffen, a biology Ph.D. candidate at the University of Tulsa in Oklahoma, who first found the new animal.

Youthful Masquerade

On May 23, 2011, Steffen was collecting many-ribbed salamanders from a mountain creek in Lake Catherine State Park. Short on adult samples, he scooped up a few larvae.

When the tests came back, though, one was “really different.” He assumed it was a mistake, but a quick look at his field notes revealed that the unique results belonged to the same sample that had contained the developing eggs. So, it hadn’t been an anomaly—the specimen had been a mature adult, disguised as a larva.

With co-author Kelly Irwin, of the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, Steffen sequenced a few more of the odd animal’s genes and found the same result. They’d found a new species of paedomorphic salamander.

Confirming the new species meant finding another specimen—and that would take another two years.

Confirming the Find

The spring of 2012 was drier than usual—not good conditions for salamanders—and Steffen failed to find a matching salamander. He again started to wonder if he’d made some kind of mistake. Then, on an unseasonably warm day in February 2013, Steffen and Irwin scooped up a salamander identical to the 2011 specimen. A month later, Steffen found several more.

An adult female Ouachita streambed salamander (bottom) and the larval form of its closest relative, the many-ribbed salamander (top). Photograph by Michael A. Steffen

“You can see through the belly really easily,” Steffen said, and “you can look for reproductive organs if you move them around a little bit.” When he saw mature testes in the young-looking salamanders, he knew he had the right species.

Ultimately, he collected and tested 24 additional animals, which confirmed the discovery of a new species.

Why E. subfluvicola evolved to disguise itself as a youngster is unknown, but the scientists suspect that its youthful form gives it access to an otherwise unexploited part of the streambed and prevents it from breeding with the related species.

According to their genetic research, the team estimates that E. subfluvicola and E. multiplicata became separate species about 18 million years ago.

“There could be other paedamorphic salamanders,” Steffen added, explaining that many researchers do not collect larval samples. They could be stepping right over new species without knowing it—just as he nearly did in May 2011.

“If we happened to find three many-ribbed salamander larvae on that day instead of two many-ribbed and the new species, we would probably never have known about this species.”

Comments

Todd Davis

Hot springs ar

July 24, 2014, 12:00 am

Late winter,2011. One weekend I had several friends come in town, we decided to do some fishing. A cold sat night we ran a trol line in the main channel of Hamilton , between 70 and 270. Not until now I know what we encountered when we checked out lines. Without a doubt that is it. We have pictures and short video clip. We released it back in the lake

Justin Thyme

Hamilton

May 3, 2014, 10:29 am

And unknown to him, he scooped up and dissected the last remaining 24 members of this new species.

Eduardo Serrano

México city

May 2, 2014, 5:53 pm

Ir reminds me the AJOLOTE native from México city valley. Could it be the same?

Christina Zumwalt

Peekskill, NY

May 2, 2014, 12:57 pm

Interesting! The details of how the reproductive isolation and speciation occurred are fun to think about.

Darrell H. Leacock

Nebraska

May 2, 2014, 12:00 pm

I do not have at hand the name of the author of the following quote, but here it is for those who will not understand it.
” You may not be a candidate for genius, however it is your choice to remain ignorant”

Steve

Minnesota

May 1, 2014, 8:33 pm

Why, oh why, do you insist on claiming evolution to be fact. There is no “fact” in evolution except that it is THEORY. Species we have failed to identify previously, do not indicate some creature has evolved either. Yea, you go on evolving, and see where it gets you. I think little, if any, improvement might be noticed. Maybe in two million years, you will still look like…. dust.

Rita Neu

United States

May 1, 2014, 6:39 pm

I am concerned that so many specimens, of what appears to to be a very small population of “immediate conservation concern”, were taken for testing, which appears to mean that they were destroyed in the process.

Post a comment

Blog Search

Search for:

We’re Moving!

As of October 22, 2014, Weird & Wild will be hosted on National Geographic's main news site. We'll continue to be your source for all things naturally bizarre—and as always, please send your feedback to newsdesk@ngs.org.

Weird & Wild Contributors

Posting Rules

Opinions expressed in blogs are those of the blogger and/or the blogger's organization, and not necessarily those of the National Geographic Society. Bloggers and commenters are required to observe National Geographic's community rules.