Local Government Minister sets out plans to strengthen rules to prevent anyone found guilty of serious crimes from serving on local councils.

Local Government Minister Marcus Jones has set out plans to strengthen rules to prevent anyone found guilty of serious crimes from serving on local councils.

Under the planned changes to criteria, it would ensure those who represent their communities are held to the highest possible standards.

Current rules make clear that anyone convicted of an offence carrying a prison sentence of more than 3 months is banned from serving as a local councillor.

However, Mr Jones said that while this may have prevented criminals from becoming councillors, it does not reflect modern sentencing practices.

New rules could mean anyone given an Anti Social Behaviour Injunction, a Criminal Behaviour Order or added to the sex offenders’ register, would no longer be able to hold elected office in their communities.

Local Government Minister Marcus Jones said:

Councillors hold an important position of trust and authority in communities across England. We need to hold them to the highest possible standards.

The current rules are letting residents and councils down by not preventing people who should never be considered for such roles from standing for election.

The changes the government is proposing would help make sure anyone convicted of a serious crime, regardless of whether it comes with a custodial sentence, will not be able to serve as a councillor.

Changes to reflect modern day sentencing
Current barriers to becoming a councillor include being employed by the authority, being subject to a bankruptcy order or being convicted of an offence resulting in a prison sentence.

These restrictions were implemented in 1972, before the sex offenders register or other non-custodial orders existed. The new proposed measures would bring rules much more into the present day by including the alternatives to a prison sentence also becoming a barrier to being a councillor.

They would apply to councillors and mayors in parish, town, local, county and unitary councils, combined authorities and the Greater London Assembly.

It would mean a ban on standing to be elected or if once elected a councillor was subsequently convicted of a serious offence, that resulted in an Anti Social Behaviour Injunction, a Criminal Behaviour Order or being on the sex offenders’ register, being forced to step down.

The changes would better reflect rules governing standards of MPs, where members face suspension from the House for anything that contravenes the parliamentary code of conduct.

Submit News to Us

Local news where you can have your say! News is also fed here from other media via RSS feeds. Please also send in your news, email press@qnews.co.uk.

Local news where you can have your say! News is also fed here from other media via RSS feeds. Please also send in your news, email press@qnews.co.uk.

Your Comments:

said says:19/09/2017 11:44 AM

Originally Posted by roving-eye

Local Government Minister sets out plans to strengthen rules to prevent anyone found guilty of serious crimes from serving on local councils.

Local Government Minister Marcus Jones has set out plans to strengthen rules to prevent anyone found guilty of serious crimes from serving on local councils.

Under the planned changes to criteria, it would ensure those who represent their communities are held to the highest possible standards.

Current rules make clear that anyone convicted of an offence carrying a prison sentence of more than 3 months is banned from serving as a local councillor.

However, Mr Jones said that while this may have prevented criminals from becoming councillors, it does not reflect modern sentencing practices.

New rules could mean anyone given an Anti Social Behaviour Injunction, a Criminal Behaviour Order or added to the sex offenders’ register, would no longer be able to hold elected office in their communities.

Local Government Minister Marcus Jones said:

Councillors hold an important position of trust and authority in communities across England. We need to hold them to the highest possible standards.

The current rules are letting residents and councils down by not preventing people who should never be considered for such roles from standing for election.

The changes the government is proposing would help make sure anyone convicted of a serious crime, regardless of whether it comes with a custodial sentence, will not be able to serve as a councillor.

Changes to reflect modern day sentencing
Current barriers to becoming a councillor include being employed by the authority, being subject to a bankruptcy order or being convicted of an offence resulting in a prison sentence.

These restrictions were implemented in 1972, before the sex offenders register or other non-custodial orders existed. The new proposed measures would bring rules much more into the present day by including the alternatives to a prison sentence also becoming a barrier to being a councillor.

They would apply to councillors and mayors in parish, town, local, county and unitary councils, combined authorities and the Greater London Assembly.

It would mean a ban on standing to be elected or if once elected a councillor was subsequently convicted of a serious offence, that resulted in an Anti Social Behaviour Injunction, a Criminal Behaviour Order or being on the sex offenders’ register, being forced to step down.

The changes would better reflect rules governing standards of MPs, where members face suspension from the House for anything that contravenes the parliamentary code of conduct.

I was given to understand that anyone who has a conviction, apart from motoring offences - was not allowed to be even employed as an employee of the government. Crimes committed by government employees arise once they are employed in positions that allow the opportunity to commit crime, there are hundreds of examples across the nation, of fraudulent crime committed by those who have access to confidential information, the resources and the means.