Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

If only those words and concepts were defined in some sort of ever-updating tome or online format which not only included older words and concepts, but newer words and concepts… those in the parlance of our times.

I agree! I was expecting closer to 50/50. I guess I understand the appeal of socialism, but how many fucking times are we going to have to try it before people realize its not a good idea? (I wonder whether, all told, good or bad intentions have caused more misery and death?)

Just 27 percent believe government should play a large role in regulating the economy, the Harvard poll found, and just 30 percent think the government should play a large role in reducing income inequality. Only 26 percent said government spending is an effective way to increase economic growth

Yet 48 percent agreed that “basic health insurance is a right for all people.” And 47 percent agreed with the statement that “Basic necessities, such as food and shelter, are a right that the government should provide to those unable to afford them.”

This seems to comport with similar polls that I’ve seen in the past.

That is, either people don’t have a consistent picture of what they want, or want something that quick polls and words like “capitalism” and “socialism”, as they seem to be understood, can’t capture.

i think you’re just misunderstanding their consistency by using things like logic. They have a consistent picture of what they want in the sense that their policy concepts are consistently driven by their feelz.

what if someone has twenty bucks and decides he or she would rather buy heroin than dinner? [Of course there are things people can value over their own lives (I just haven’t found one yet)] My point being If you buy them dinner you’re effectively buying them heroin, are you not?

At one time, when libertarian knew what the fuck they were talking about … instead of repeating memorized soundbites … we would patiently agree that it”s typical human compassion to want everyone’s food, housing and healthcare to be provided …. then we’d describe how it was done far more effectively by private charities.

If they laughed at “libertarian bullshit” we’d calmly show how Medicaid eligibles are more likely to die uninsured than everyone else (the private market). 18.8% uninsured in the Medicaid eligibles, 16.3% everywhere else. (both pre-Medicare)

Now, so many libertarians just laugh and repeat soundbites, having no knowledge what they’re talking about (just like the progs and conservatives) but celebrating their shared tribal loyalty … and why the libertarian brand is rejected by 91% of libertarians (Cato survey).

Hey dumbass,I count at least 10 comments later than my dead thread … including yours! (snort) Every time you pull your dead thread bullshit, you make a public fool of yourself.

Hint for the mentally retarded, My comment is dated 4.26. Do a page search for 4.27. Then join me in ridiculing MigrantLogChipper

And you don’t have the balls to deal with any actual ISSUES. Typical of you bullies. Especially the Log Chippers, who are the lowest life form on earth, (Why does it feel like I’m kicking a cripple? .)

Oh that they are. There are two that ride my bus home. Both guys. The stand at the front of the bus in such a fashion that it’s very difficult for people to get off and on the bus. They are two stupid to even notice.

The plan to hand Liberia’s education over to private hands has also angered the UN’s Special Rapporteur on the right to education, Kishore Singh.

In March he said that “the concept of education as a public good [was] under attack”.

“Provision of public education of good quality is a core function of the state,” Mr Singh added. “Abandoning this to the commercial benefit of a private company constitutes a gross violation of the right to education.”

But Mr Werner thinks this criticism “misses the mark” and is the result of only talking to the teachers’ unions.

When I die I don’t care what you do with my body but I want all my stuff put in a big pile and burned. It’s my stuff and I don’t want nobody touching my stuff. The good stuff, anyway. The junk you can give to Kathy Ireland. Kathy Ireland can touch my junk.

I read a while back that they were all friends as well as friends of friends of Matress Girl and that they directly coordinated with each other about the details and timing of the allegations. Which basically makes their testimony, true or not, wholly invalid.

Maybe, maybe not. Even supposing that their allegations are true, the fact that they colluded with each other to cooroborate their testimony and/or evidence, makes their allegations automatically suspect. Either a conspiracy not only to defame but to use judicial system as a cudgel, or they invalidated their own testimony which justifiably ruined their chance at ‘justice’. So they’re evil or stupid, you pick.

Not for supposed rape victims. The SJWs would be falling over themselves to make prosecuting them a nightmare. It’s much easier for the various authorities to go after the more unpopular people like Nungesser.

The Columbia graduate is suing his alma mater again ? over the fact the school continued to permit “Mattress Girl” Emma Sulkowicz to lug around her mattress despite him being cleared of charges that he raped her.

I think his parents are very middle-income back in Germany. And I’m okay with him suing the university and their officials for contributing to a hostile environment (as opposed to a judgement proof idiot). Hoist them on their own retards.

And I’m sure he has some connections and sympathizers with money. People who may realize it’s this kid today, their own kids tomorrow. People who hate SJWs and have found an effective way to push back against their worst abuses.

“Bear Grylls would have no trouble surviving on a remote Pacific Island with nothing more than a snakeskin in which to collect his own urine, but according to Grayson Perry he wouldn’t be much use on the mean streets of Finsbury Park.

The Turner prize-winning artist has turned his sights on the survivalist and his exceptionally rugged version of masculinity, arguing that it isn’t fit for the 21st century.

“He celebrates a masculinity that is useless,” Perry said. “Try going into an estate agent in Finsbury Park and come out with an affordable flat. I want to see Bear Grylls looking for a decent state school for his child!””

“Men might be good at taking the risk of stabbing someone or driving a car very fast, but when it comes to opening up, men are useless,” Perry told the Radio Times in an interview to promote his new series, All Man. “Masculinity is a decorative feature that is essentially counter-productive.””

“”However, he added that pressure on men to adopt overtly masculine traits is compounded by human sexuality, which also reinforces stereotypes about women.”Who has sex fantasies about gender equality?” he said. “Our sexuality is formed in the past ? we are invested in sexual differences.”

Perry is known for both his art, in particular his work in ceramics which won him the 2003 Turner prize, and appearing in extravagant women’s clothing.””

I like the assumption that the lessons Bear Grylls learned becoming a survivalist would have no positive impact on his daily life. Clearly the fortitude someone needs to be willing to drink their own piss in order to stave off dehydration wouldn’t impact their daily life at all. I mean, it’s not like hard work and effort have any value outside of survivalism.

Showing up to the negotiation with a snakeskin of your own piss to drink would give you a significant psychological advantage. It would also immediately disqualify you as a crazy person, regardless of the anti-discrimination laws.

Now, I’m no Warty, but I find being able to lift/move heavy things, endure cold/hot temps without discomfort, and exert myself for long periods to all be very useful, even in an urban environment. What kind of man does Perry hire to install his water heater?

So basically this guy is a complete narcissist and functionally useless in the real world. You know, the place that everyone else lives. He harps on things he’s probably not good at and puts them down to make himself feel better. I don’t recall Bear Grylls ever putting down some other sort of lifestyle (not that I’ve really paid attention), but rather doing things he probably enjoys (on a macro scale. He probably doesn’t enjoy drinking his own piss, but the survival thing as a whole). God forbid a man should do what he likes. Then again, that’s the whole premise of the Prog culture…people don’t know what’s best for them, but I sure do!

I haven’t watched Bear Grylls for a while (I’m surprised he is still relevant), but I do remember him openly discussing how important his faith and his family are to him when he’s in those survival situations**.

*All that being said, emotions are best buried deep within one’s heart and soul.

**I’m well aware that “survival situation” in this context means the producer handing you a burger or ferrying you back and forth between a tree and a hotel in between takes.

“Yesterday, IJ won our fastest victory ever. Just hours after we launched our latest civil forfeiture case with an exclusive feature in The Washington Post, the government agreed to drop all charges against our clients and returned every cent that it had wrongfully seized. This case involves one of the most outrageous forfeiture actions we’ve seen yet. During a routine traffic stop for a broken tail light, the Muskogee, Oklahoma, sheriff’s department seized more than $53,000 from our clients?a church and a Burmese Christian band on tour in the U.S. trying to raise funds for charity. The full Washington Post story is here, and you can find more information about the case, including IJ’s video, on our website.”

It is indeed good news, Mustang, and in keeping with the “Should we have any purely good news” meme, I provide this quote: “In 2014, a Washington Post investigation found that, since the 9/11 terror attacks, police had seized over $2.5 billion in cash nationally without search warrants or indictments. Of those nearly 62,000 seizures, only one in six was legally challenged by defendants, in part because the cost of doing so tends to be high. When defendants did challenge the seizures, the government agreed to return all or part of the money 41 percent of the time.”

“I feel the knee-jerk of surprise when a darker-skinned person, perhaps dressed a certain way, speaks “articulately” or “intelligently.” I’m intrigued when I see old black men playing chess, or a young black woman reading a novel. Despite my best intentions, my general sense of black identity is implicitly restricted to all-star athlete or radical activist.”

So you’re a racist who assumes black people can’t be smart and you assume that I think the same thing.

I feel “naturally” attracted to lighter skinned people. When I am attracted to a person of color, she’s too often a woman who’s straightened her hair, or who has a skinny nose. How many other white guys out there resonate with this? (I personally know several.) You can blame the movies, but at some point you have to confront white supremacy in your own soul. You think this is a coincidence, that you just “happen” to be more attracted to white people?

“I feel the knee-jerk of surprise when a darker-skinned person, perhaps dressed a certain way, speaks “articulately” or “intelligently.” I’m intrigued when I see old black men playing chess, or a young black woman reading a novel. Despite my best intentions, my general sense of black identity is implicitly restricted to all-star athlete or radical activist.”

Okay, so this guy actually is racist. I thought old black men playing chess in the park was a stereotype. Also, why in the world would a black women reading novels be surprising? I’ve been given no reason to think they aren’t just as fond of bodice rippers as the rest of the female segment of the population.

That pretty much explains most of our problems with Islam. We have an Arab problem as much as anything. Even when the terrorists are not Arabs, they are Muslims who have adopted the Arab version of Islam.

But in several states, the right of free speech has clashed with the question of whether allowing photographs in the voting booth, a typically private space, could compromise elections. Some states, like Pennsylvania, have banned the practice. Last year, a federal court in New Hampshire overturned a ban on such photos, a decision still being appealed.

Snapchat, the social network of choice for many younger voters, joined the fray on Friday, filing an amicus brief in New Hampshire arguing against the ban. It called ballot selfies “the latest way that voters, especially young voters, engage with the political process.”

Both supporters and detractors of the restrictions agree that there are significant freedoms at stake. They just disagree on which freedoms to focus on.

Just tell ’em the Koch Bros. support this idea as a way for them to verify you voted the way they pay you to vote before they pay you. We don’t make all the big bucks spending just a few hours a day on the internet posting pro-Koch talking points, they expect us to turn out the votes, too.

The 55-page report is not the first to point to the dire financial future facing the city’s health care and hospital system, which has maintained its mission of treating all patients regardless of their ability to pay or their immigration status. But the new report reflects the impact of the Affordable Care Act, and points to trends that make adaptation daunting.

As previously uninsured low-income New Yorkers have gained insurance, they also have gained new health care options. The city system has been losing those patients to other providers that are seen as more upscale or convenient to patients. At the same time, it remains the major source of care for nearly one million city residents who remain uninsured, many of them unauthorized immigrants who are ineligible for public insurance.

Uninsured patients and those covered by Medicaid, the federal and state program for the poor, now represent nearly 70 percent of Health & Hospitals’ total hospital stays, compared with 40 percent for other hospitals in the city, the report says. Yet federal and state funding that helps cover the cost of caring for the uninsured is projected to decline by almost $1 billion ? from $2.2 billion in the 2016 fiscal year to $1.4 billion in the 2020 fiscal year.

I miss the old Baptist Preachers talking about Satanic rock records. I had friends in school who went to churches that believed that stuff. I remember seeing them on local TV doing their Sunday morning shows playing Led Zeppelin and Eagles records backwards. Man that was some fun shit.

Oh god, my parents were way into that whole “rock is the tool of satan.” thing. We had VHSes that explained it in detail and would watch them as a family. I still have a soft spot for the music from Hair because of those things.

Led Zeppelin was one of the few rock bands that actually had a sense of humor. It makes sense they were most hated by the two most humorless groups of people in America; rock critics and evangelical ministers.

Leaving a medical billing system exposed on a file sharing network is a major failure, something that can turn the lives of its customers into a nightmare. And it’s not sufficient to say “we fixed it” without addressing the underlying causes. It seems to me this company was so poorly run, it needed to go out of business one way or another.

A journalist who was attempting to leave the White House grounds said that Secret Service officers reported a “jumper” outside the Eisenhower Executive Office Building. The report said a stretcher was requested and that “the individual is in a moat” ? possibly a reference to a dry trench inside the fence perimeter.

Isn’t the whole thing based on copyright law and blackmail? The scam as I understand it is that you give them your money and in return they advance you to the next level and let you see the super secret materials available to the enlightened who have reached that level. Of course there is always another level and even more amazing secrets to be had for the right price. In addition, as part of your therapy and growth you basically confess every single embarrassing action or thought you have ever had, which the churches notes and keeps for blackmail purposes should you ever decide to leave.

So everyone in the church is subject to blackmail by the threat of whatever embarrassing thing they have being released and all of the church materials are protected by copyright and thus can be prevented from public release.

They are not a threat to the country or anything, but they are some seriously nasty pieces of work. If I were ever elected to Congress, I would get in touch with some defector who had the magic materials and just read them into the Congressional record. It would destroy their monopoly on them and their entire business model. Since teh actions of Congressman on the floor of the House are immune from all civil and criminal action, there would be nothing they could do about it. Just lance that boil on the ass of society once and for all

The Turks have Europe by the balls. The only reason there is a refugee crisis is because the Turks decided to let the refugees out of the camps and head up to Europe. They basically can turn the refugee flow on and off like a spigot.

It makes *sense* in this context but it’s reprehensible to potentially ruin a life over it. But hey, in politics and to these sociopaths what’s a single life (think what Obama and Hillary did with the Benghazi video guy) when they feel they’re doing things for the ‘greater good’? Although, one may quibble what Merkel did with the refugees wasn’t for the ‘greater good’.

I am of the belief that failing to have a position on something was somehow viewed as “cool” during the millennial formative years. I think also there was societal pressure to be measured, tolerant, and slow to form negative opinions. I think these factors are driving the “motivated” to be feminists, Puritanigressives, and socialists.

Anecdote: I talked with a friend of mine in Chicago about the elections for about five hours last weekend. He seemed to believe Sanders was the “common sense” choice. Should mention here that this friend is a redditor. So for the ensuing three hours following my opinions on Sanders, we talked about personal responsibility, the burden the State should be saddled with, and whether or not his money should be used to fund someone else’s life. All positions removed, he did say that he “never thinks about that stuff” and he even believes he shouldn’t have to think about “that stuff.”

Its easy. Its called intestate succession. He is not currently married and has no living children or grand children. So the estate goes first to his parents, who are both deceased as I understand it, and then equally to his siblings. I heard he has one sister. She is going to get it all.

A woman is walking along a highway, so a cop decides he wants to talk to her. The woman does not want to talk. The cop decides this is no bueno and proceeds to corner her under a tractor trailer, taze her multiple times, and arrest her on bullshit charges. Ta Da!

Well that doesn’t seem true. Unless you mean “high priority” as in, Reason staff applying no critical thought to the topic and largely ignoring it aside from some Dalmia screeds. By far, the most editorialization, current event updates and genuine commentary on that topic comes out of the commentariat, not the Reason staff. I think there’s some standing orders from the editorial staff to ignore it when the writers aren’t cheerleading it.

I’m watching the Hillsborough 30 for 30 now, after reading your guys’ praises earlier. It’s breaking my fucking heart and giving me quite the anxiety. (And now it’s getting to the lie and more lies and cover-up, and so I’ve progressed to anger.)

I also watched the Duke Lacrosse episode recently on yinz’ all recommendations. Was excellent.

I don’t follow sports, so with that in mind ? which other episodes ought I and everyone else to watch?

The one about Ben Johnson testing positive at the 88 Olympics is really good. It follows the entire track culture in the 1980s and more or less says Johnson was set up by the creepy Santa Monica Track Club coach.

The one about the 1980 Russian Olympic Hockey team that tells the Miracle on Ice story from the Russian perspective kicks ass.

Those are two really good ones that come to mind. There are others though that I can’t think of right now.

Modell managed to fire two of the three or four greatest coaches in NFL history (Paul Brown and Belecheck) and fired one of the greatest college coaches (Nick Saban) to make up for it. I had no idea the staff Belicheck had in Cleveland. It was basically the same group of people Saban who went on to build the dynasty in New England with Ozzy Newsome thrown in. And that dumb ass fired them all except for Newsome. It makes me want to drive up to Baltimore and piss on his grave for you. And I am not even a Browns fan.

He could never have won in Cleveland because he was comically broke by the early 90s. Even after he got the bribe to move to Baltimore, he was still so broke that he couldn’t even get his team proper practice equipment. The league made him sell out 5 years after moving. It’s incredible.

I challenge you to find a more successful con artist. The guy bought the team with other people’s money, managed to run the team at a loss for 50-some years, and when the clock finally hit midnight, he managed to sell out for hundreds of millions of dollars. And by all accounts, everyone who ever knew him loved him because he was so goddamn charming. It’s just amazing.

It was something like 400 comments in less than 10 minutes. It was glorious, and then the cosmos ruined it. It shall never be forgotten and shall forever drive a burning stake between the true libertarians and the cosmos.

For those who grew up during the Cold War, capitalism meant freedom from the Soviet Union and other totalitarian regimes. For those who grew up more recently, capitalism has meant a financial crisis from which the global economy still hasn’t completely recovered.

I do prefer the term ‘free markets’, but I typically use it in conjunction with the word capitalism. Lefties do not understand what either of those things mean or the difference between cronyism and free market capitalism.

“Capitalism” kind of has a connotation of a system managed by the government.

Nope. Sorry, wrong.

Capitalism is a PROCESS, where Capital (savings, or postponed consumption,) Capital Goods (land, tools, etc.) and Labor are used in conjunction to transform goods of a lesser value into goods of a higher value for trade and wealth accumulation. People tend to confuse Capitalism with corporativism.

Whatever the little Marxian shits believe is inconsequential. They will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes, after all, so who cares about them?

Old Mexican, elsewhere, demands that we be forced to show a Birth Certificate … or reveal our genitals … to use a “public” bathroom … thereby shitting on any rights to personal privacy … in his personal “libertarian” gulag.

Just 27 percent believe government should play a large role in regulating the economy, the Harvard poll found, and just 30 percent think the government should play a large role in reducing income inequality.

[…]

Yet 48 percent agreed that “basic health insurance is a right for all people.” And 47 percent agreed with the statement that “Basic necessities, such as food and shelter, are a right that the government should provide to those unable to afford them.”

So the whole poll is just a big, discombobulated mess of self-contradictory positions.

“Young people could be saying that there are problems with capitalism, contradictions,” Frank Newport, the editor in chief of Gallup, said when asked about the new data. “I certainly don’t know what’s going through their heads.”

I think that’s the best position to take on our nation’s young people, and then just back away slowly, and pray to god they’re ambivalent about voting.

Depending on how people interpreted the questions, for the idea of ‘rights’ — which is fairly abstract concept for too many people, so not defined well in their heads when responding to this — answering that you feel people should be provided with basic food and shelter if they have no alternative to starving and freezing on the streets, does not seem to be a contradiction of endorsing capitalism nor a step towards joining the Communist Party. The question should be better delineated if they want the true Millennial mindset on the topic.

Millennials reject capitalism… and socialism? More primaries tonight. Going to be a good night for Trump. Bernie Sanders plans to soldier on, even if he loses (as expected). Paul Nungesser is suing again. British university speaker censored over anti-Obama comments. Prince died without a will.

“I would think that being in prison would make a person hate the state.”

Libertarian recruits?”

Unless they’re ascribed to the “grow the beast until it explodes” philosophy, they don’t seem to reflect much of a libertarian leaning. I don’t know how many libertarian books fill prison libraries though, I’ll ask some friends.

“If this decision remains in effect, the impact on the November election could be devastating,” said Penda Hair, a lawyer for the Advancement Project. Hair said the plaintiffs would appeal the ruling immediately, asking for expedited consideration of the case to ensure a decision before voters go to the polls.

North Carolina could be a pivotal state in the presidential race this fall. Gov. Pat McCrory, who signed the voting law, also will be up for re-election in what could be a close contest.

Voting rights groups fear that the law’s various restrictions will cause longer lines and make it harder for minorities to vote, when the presidential and governor’s races could make for a high turnout election in the state.

Know and have know a fuck ton of minorities. Exactly 100% of them have some form of ID. And I will absolutely not let this go, and will kick it in the nuts every chance I get. If requiring ID to vote is racist, demanding an ID to bear arms is super-double racist.

I’m not against allowing felons to vote. I may not even be against non-citizens voting (depending on the circs), but how in hell can you know if some person or groups aren’t driving around from polling station to polling station, and pulling the lever repeatedly for a given candidate? For local races, I can’t tell you how many times a major local initiative that can be devastating to a local economy came down to a few hundred votes.

They demand I show and carry id to bear a concealed weapon, yet voting is the most potentially violent act a person can commit, and it’s racist to ask for ID to make sure they haven’t voted multiple times.

No, I was merely making a point about voting restrictions in general. I’m being careful to say that I’m not taking my voter id position because I don’t think undesirables shouldn’t be voting, I’m taking my position because without voter ID, how can we know or ever know if people aren’t committing voter fraud?

The who gets to vote is a different subject. I have no doubt that the “Republican Legislature” passed this law with illegal aliens in mind. But even that is a secondary concern to me.

Hyper, those Virginia felons had already served their sentences. The Governor simply restored their voting rights. Rand Paul introduced a bill in the US Seate to do just that nationwide, but I believe it died in committee.

Here’s the thinking – you do your time and you’re re-integrated into society. Also, from a libertarian perspective, realize how many people are declared felons for BS reasons – drugs, mere possession of weapons, etc.

I’ll be the first to tell you that I wish the undesirables weren’t voting. And I cast a wide net. As a compromise I’m willing concede that no one should be voting except as by contract in voluntary associations. I can’t fathom as to why Todd the Hawaiian beach bum, Cletus the West Virginian sister banger and Tyreese the Detroit mugger all get to have some kind of legitimized say-so about infringements on my life, liberty and property.

In very small communities and clan and family groups, I can see some kind of democracy working well to it’s own limited extent, but there’s no reason I ought to be forced into an association of tens or hundreds of millions of people all vying for their turn at the helms of a violent monopoly of ultimate decision making.

I believe that even the libertarian establishment never heard of the MASSIVE voter registration fraud by ACORN in Seattle’s King County. Imagine the irony of aggressive prosecution against ACORN, in one of the most progressive cities in America.

(Colorado Springs in 2005, Kansas City, Mo., in 2006 King County, Wash., in 2007. ACORN’s Las Vegas office was raided by a state criminal investigator on Oct. 7, 2008.)

“Making Voting Easier/Opposing Voter ID” was one of the other Very Libertarian positions on the most-commonly referenced Nolan Chart…. along with some other oddities

I’ve never quite understood the supposed ‘libertarian-ishness’ of the idea. The idea of any requirements for voting – like identification – being tantamount to “barriers” to voting seems to be an idea promulgated by the worst kinds of rabble-rousing statists.

SugarFree It’s sad that Reason would let an old man make such a fool of himself.

(laughing) It’s sad that the Birther “mentality” refuses to accept even absolute proof. Tribal bullies travel in a pack, like wild dogs. So we’re now up to three proven liars and fools. So far!

Here again is the Gilmore’s psychotic lie, defended by two fellow thugs (so far):

“Making Voting Easier/Opposing Voter ID” was one of the other Very Libertarian positions on the most-commonly referenced Nolan Chart….

Click GILMORE’S link and we see:

“Make voter registration easier”

So Gilmore posted a link proving himself a liar! … for the same reason psychos send like conspiracy emails with a phony link to Snopes, because goobers swallow anything from their own tribe … including SugarFree and SoaveTheLastDanceForMe (insane but typical of tribal behavior)

(Again, my tone is in defense of aggression initiated by a typical thuggish bully)

On Monday evening, U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Schroeder upheld the law, ruling that it didn’t give minorities any less opportunity to participate in the political process than whites, as the plaintiffs alleged under the Voting Rights Act.

Well to be fair, minorities aren’t as smart as whites are, so they need to have things made easier for them.

So I’ve had the good fortune to listen to Democratic Senate contest ads for Murland all week long. I don’t even know if any Republicans are running. I haven’t heard any ads, so maybe there are no Republicans running. Anyway, their single issue seems to be gun control. I have briefly heard them mention all of the typical marxist shit, minimum wage increase, more spending on fucking everything, but wiping out your 2nd amendment rights seems to be the big ticket item.

oops, if millennials reject capitalism, is that the 103rd nail in the coffin of Nick’s libertarian moment?

Proof of the libertarian moment was BOTH the increased social liberalism by Americans AND the extreme social conservatism of the Paulista Cult. I’m waiting for tomorrow’s sunrise to PROVE a libertarian moment.

So we’ve lost EVERY economic battle for decades, in public opinion .. while rejecting all gains on the social side … a strategy worthy of George Custer.

Not to mention the spread of “libertarian ideas” like school choice .. which movement libertarians had NOTHING to do with … it was done entirely by Nolan libertarians, who reject the libertarian label. (Cato survey)

Not trying to be a dick here, but it appears you need to brush up on your reading skills as well. Nowhere in the link the article provided does it say the survey was conducted at Harvard business school, it literally says “The Harvard University survey, which polled young adults between ages 18 and 29, found that 51 percent of respondents do not support capitalism. Just 42 percent said they support it.”

It doesn’t suggest or imply that they conducted the poll ONLY at the business school. What it does suggest and imply is that it was done across the board at the harvard campus. The Harvard campus is a fucking bastion of SJW, BLM, Intersectional Feminist ideology, and one of the things all 3 of those groups have in common is a deep seated hatred of capitalism and a love of socialism.

So, i’m perfectly willing to admit when i made mistake, but so far you haven’t shown me that i have made one.

Nowhere in the link the article provided does it say the survey was conducted at Harvard business school

Also a hypocrite. Pay attention 1) Why would it have to? 2) Since it also doesn’t say it was conducted among Harvard students, per YOUR bullshit claim. 3) So you have one set of standards for yourself, and another for me???

/facepalm

What it does suggest and imply is that it was done across the board at the Harvard campus

also shameless

The Harvard campus is a fucking bastion of SJW, BLM, Intersectional Feminist ideology, and one of the things all 3 of those groups have in common is a deep seated hatred of capitalism and a love of socialism.

Evasive. Pay attention

1) Those appear on 90% of campuses in America. 2) YOU EQUATED WITH BERKELEY WHICH IS BULLSHIT (or merely hysteria). Harvard Business School was just the easiest way to expose it. 3) You’re also clueless on liberalism (DO NOT NOW ASSUME I’M A LIBERAL)

I bought brand new white Ferrari byy working ONline work. five month ago i hear from my friend that she is working some online job and making more then $85/hr i can’t beleive. But when i start this job i have to believed her Now i am also making 85$/hr if you want to try. Check Here…….JU010