Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., speaks during the leadership forum at the National Rifle Association's annual convention in Friday, April 25, 2014, in Indianapolis. Several potential Republican contenders for president planned on courting gun-rights supporters at the convention Friday.

U.S. STORY COVERAGE

INDIANAPOLIS | Several potential Republican presidential candidates courted gun-rights supporters Friday at the National Rifle Association's annual convention, talking up their pro-gun credentials while imploring the crowd to fight not just for their Second Amendment rights but for other freedoms they say are being threatened.

U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, former Pennsylvania U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal addressed the NRA's annual leadership forum, a kind of political pep rally the organization considers one of its premier events. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and U.S. Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire also recorded brief videos that were played for the crowd of more than 2,000 inside Lucas Oil Stadium, home to the Indianapolis Colts.

One after another, the possible 2016 contenders thanked the NRA and its members for flexing their considerable political muscle to help push back recent gun-control efforts, including legislation following the 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut that would have required background checks for gun purchases. They said that same activism will be critical heading into elections this fall, in 2016 and beyond.

Jindal charged that Vice President Joe Biden and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, both possible Democratic presidential candidates, think the Second Amendment is little more than "a phrase from a speech writer."

"If they had their way they'd simply cut and paste the Constitution and just get rid of the Second Amendment entirely," said Jindal, who approved several gun rights bills last year, including one that creates stiff penalties for those who knowingly publish the names of gun permit holders.

Rubio opposed limiting gun rights after Sandy Hook, but he also saw his NRA grade drop from an A to a B+ amid criticism of his stance on some gun-rights legislation.

He said Friday that being able to provide a safe home for one's family is fundamental to achieving the American dream. And he said that while gun-rights supporters were outraged and saddened by violence such as Sandy Hook, public policy "must be guided by common sense."

"Making it harder for law-abiding Americans to defend themselves has not, does not and will not prevent future tragedies such as these," Rubio said.

Both Santorum and Pence noted their wives share their love of guns. Pence, who approved a measure this year to allow guns in locked vehicles on school property, said when he met his wife, she had a gun and a motorcycle and "it was love at first sight."

Santorum said it's not just gun rights that are under assault. He called on the NRA's millions of members to also fight for religious freedom and First Amendment rights.

"Just protecting the Second Amendment while all other freedoms falter isn't a winning strategy," Santorum said. "We need you to engage."

Among the more than 70,000 people expected to attend the three-day convention was Estel Rhoton of Lebanon, Ind., who made the trip with his wife and daughter. The 64-year-old union electrician said he thinks Jindal "could be presidential timber." But he liked them all.

"Any of these guys would be so far above what we've got now," Rhoton said. "It's not even close."

Gun-control supporters also were making their voices heard, holding rallies outside the event throughout the weekend. An Associated Press-GfK poll in December found that 52 percent of Americans favored stricter gun laws, 31 percent wanted them left as they were, and 15 percent said they should be loosened.

Two other Republicans considered possible presidential candidates, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, didn't attend.

Bush has attended the NRA's past conferences and has signed legislation supported by the group. In 2005, he signed the measure which allows a person to use deadly force when threatened in public places. The law received attention in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Florida in 2012. Bush also supports instant background checks for gun-show gun purchases, an unpopular position with the NRA.

However, Bush has kept his distance this year from such events and been selective making public political statements ahead of any announcement about his plans for 2016.

Christie has not been as popular with the NRA as Bush. In 2009, as a candidate for governor, he staunchly opposed a measure in Congress that would have superseded the state's strict laws forbidding carrying concealed weapons. That bill would have required New Jersey to recognize concealed-carry permits from out-of-state visitors to the state.

However, Christie has kept a lower political profile outside his chairmanship of the Republican Governors Association. Supporters say raising money for that group, and the GOP governors and candidates running this year, is consuming most of his political time.

He was in Seaside, N.J., on Friday, the site of some of the worst damage from the 2012 storm that ravaged the Jersey Shore.

___

Associated Press writer Tom Beaumont in Des Moines, Iowa contributed.

Associated PressCopyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

I am not especially fond of President Obama's leadership and policies, though I am even less fond of those at this forum.

As a Senator, Obama got a 'D' grade from the Brady group, which advocates gun control. It just didn't seem to be something which he cared much about.

Any of the gun control legislation which I have seen introduced in Congress seems to be largely from "back-benchers", or some keeping promises to constituents. None seem to ever receive many co-sponsors, especially influential ones, and even the primary sponsors do not seem to seek many co-sponsors.

What gun-control legislation which does get introduced often seems to me to be sort of "straw-man" stuff, perhaps intended to keep this issue alive largely for political purposes. I am often quite suspicious as to where the funding comes from for these non-effective, and certainly not aggressive efforts.