My point being was, that in China, for a national to eat dog meat publicly, it is not a common sight (though, not unseen, and I won't argue that there aren't certain places where it is prevelant). It is not socially acceptable, unlike you seem to think it is. Just like it's not "socially acceptable" to give your child a back-hander across the face... but many people still do it. Is this sinking in yet? No? I didn't think so...

Asian countries are not the only countries known for it's inhabitants to eat dog-meat. To quote wikipedia:

Does that mean it's socially acceptable for the Swiss to openly eat dog meat? No. Does it happen over there though? Yes. Often? No. A rare sight? Yes.

Now, I do admit the Asians sometimes do have some rare delicacies. So do europeans though. I have eaten snake, crocodile, emu, kangaroo, venison, "black pudding" (dried ox blood on biscuits), liver (yuck!), offle(sp?) [which is the insides of cow guts] and many other things.

Anyhow, the point I'm simply trying to make is, like I said earlier, sometimes curiosity does get the better of us. And, in a country like China, that has over 1.3 billion people, there will be alot of curios people.

As far as Im concerned, its just protein. People can eat dog if they want, I dont care. You seem to be concerned with the oddity of it all, but I dont care one bit about that.

However my point is that you can make valid judgments about a society according to what that society accepts. If people can eat Dog in large parts of China and no one blinks, its acceptable there.

If two tiny Swiss backwaters have a tradition of eating dog, but the practice is unheard of in the rest of Europe, and attempts are made to ban canine consumption, its not acceptable.

Making the connection now? Your point about how you can always find someone engaging in any type of practice is irrelevant. A few oddballs and nutcases do not make "society".

why are you saying that curiousity explains why people like the chinese and koreans eat dog meat? obviously they're probably being eaten in the more poorer sectors of the respective countries.

it's all culture. to them, they probably see it as another animal. the white man has coined the dog as "man's best friend". does that mean everyone else has to follow? i wonder how an indian from india would feel if he went to america and saw many fast food restaurants serving cow meat.

This is true, and its why people should remain separate. If you mix people with wildly varying cultures, tension and conflict occurs. This is where the western world is headed unfortunately.

Mr. Anti,
Can you name any plant or animal species that were domesticated by negroes in sub-Saharan Africa?
(Please note that watermelon was domesticated in northern Africa, and hence not by the congoids; and (fried) chicken was domesticated in Indochina; potatoes, tomatoes, and corn (maize) were all domesticated by the Amerinds)

Apparently, you need to find a dictionary and look up the definition of domesticate and get back to us. Going hunting and chucking a spear at an animal does not mean that they animal is "domesticated".

I am just wondering if any of you limit yourselves to eating only european food in order to "preserve your heritage". If so, why, and if not, why not?

I am only curious because Indian and Chinese food is pretty damn tasty.

P.S. I just registered today. Late last night I posted a comment on a thread on this board, and it has yet to appear. I am wondering if this is normal as part of the moderation process or if my post was not cleared or something. I would find the latter possibility strange since I took much care to be respectful and clear in my thoughts.

I have a great respect for the Colonial period, and part of Colonialism is exotic foods. I keep an open mind and try almost anything (although I am a vegetarian, so what I try can't have meat in it). I can't abide Thai, Ethiopean, Indian or any of the weirder items from an Asian supermarket.

I do eat Mexican food frequently, Chinese food, which I don't particularly like but can tolerate, less frequently, some Japanese food and very rarely Middle-Eastern food, though I much prefer Greek to middle eastern wherever possible.

Basically, I don't reject a food because it is non-White in origin, but I much prefer European foods, and make a conscious decision to go that route whenever possible.

(sigh) it is not socially acceptable in China. You won't see many restaurants in China serving dog-meat. It happens, but like I said it's a rare occurence. Most Asians would frown upon the idea of eating dog-meat.

Woof, woof.

__________________

“The world’s population needs to be reduced by 50%,” and “The elderly are useless eaters”

Location: "Mildewish, I heat it, it turns gluish, it cools to a tight wad, the Pyrex is Jewish" - Malice

Posts: 217

Re: Do White Nationalists limit what they eat?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Punchinello

I am just wondering if any of you limit yourselves to eating only european food in order to "preserve your heritage". If so, why, and if not, why not?

Judging by the size of a lot of the ones I've seen I doubt they limit what they eat. I do wonder what they eat though. It's like Dave Chappelle said, white people always make fun of what other people eat but nobody really knows what they eat. "Every time I try to peek in their carts they say 'get away from my cart ni99er'"

For people who wish to understand Asia and Latin America, there isn't.

You can travel, or you can rely on heresay.

Been there done that was a backpacker as well as a WN, and the one thing I noticed in all my travels is that white countries and white countries only are the only ones who encourage multiculturalism damn that altruistic streak in us it will be our end if we aren't careful.

I am just wondering if any of you limit yourselves to eating only european food in order to "preserve your heritage". If so, why, and if not, why not?

I am only curious because Indian and Chinese food is pretty damn tasty.

P.S. I just registered today. Late last night I posted a comment on a thread on this board, and it has yet to appear. I am wondering if this is normal as part of the moderation process or if my post was not cleared or something. I would find the latter possibility strange since I took much care to be respectful and clear in my thoughts.