The release of the Senate Judiciary Committee's report highlights plot holes in Ford's story

With the release of the Senate Judiciary Committee's report on the investigation into claims of sexual misconduct against Justice Kavanaugh, major inconsistencies in Christine Blasey Ford's testimony have been brought to the surface.

After investigating Ford's claims, the committee found "no evidence" of any wrongdoing by Judge Kavanaugh and nothing to support the allegations made against him.

The report indicates that over 40 witnesses were interviewed by Senate investigators and not one of them could provide evidence that the accusations levied against Kavanaugh by multiple women were true.

Since the report was compiled, however, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley has instructed the Justice Department and FBI to launch several investigations into two of the accusers for making false allegations against the then-Supreme Court nominee.

The attorney for one of the accusers, Julie Swetnick, - "Creepy Porn Lawyer" Michael Avenatti -, has also been referred for criminal investigation by Grassley after it emerged that he may have falsified witness statements to support his client's claims.

The Senate report found 'no evidence' to support the allegations against Justice Kavanaugh

According to Political Insider, it would appear the Democrats' smear campaign against a decent and honorable man was just that – a coordinated Democrat smear.

“After an extensive investigation that included the thorough review of all potentially credible evidence submitted and interviews of more than 40 individuals with information relating to the allegations, including classmates and friends of all those involved, Committee investigators found no witness who could provide any verifiable evidence to support any of the allegations brought against Justice Kavanaugh,” the report concludes.

Report highlights inconsistencies in star witness Ford’s testimony

Christine Blasey Ford was the first woman to come forward with allegations against Kavanaugh, claiming he attempted to sexually assault her in Summer 1982, while the two were in high school together.

Margot Cleveland, an opinion columnist who had covered Ford’s testimony for outlets such as USA Today, highlighted several contradictions.

One of those inconsistencies was the summer of ’82 allegation itself, with Cleveland noting her initial recollection placed the assault in the mid-80s

2/ Following hearing one point I stressed was Ford's changed story from assault happening in mid-80s/late teens to 1982 at 15. Several questioned my basis & as I explained evidence provided committee as discussed in hearing. Here's Ford's text to Washington Post that used mid-80 pic.twitter.com/5kQVf3fbgf

Chuck Grassley has referred several accusers for criminal investigation

The witness also cast doubt on the infamous "I needed two doors in my home to escape Kavanaugh" story.

“At these parties,” he said, “she did not seem to be afraid to be in rooms or apartments with only one entrance.”

Other witness statements contradict Ford’s version of events or "her truth" as Democrats would like to call it.

And they revealed a consensual encounter Ford may have had during the same timeframe…

7/ Here's what two other witnesses coming forward told investigators.I haven't seen anything in report calling into question their veracity and would think a criminal charge would have been filed against the two if they had discovered them lying. Obviously may or may not be Ford. pic.twitter.com/hLHIKQe4xG