DoD's budget reprogramming won't help with sequestration

Jared Serbu, DoD reporter, Federal News Radio

The Pentagon is putting the finishing touches on a package of proposals that would
let it move some money between its programs during tough budget times. But even if
Congress approves the request, it won't make a dent in the impact of
sequestration.

Ashton Carter, deputy secretary of defense

DoD started this calendar year facing three big budget problems: the prospect of a
year-long continuing resolution, higher than expected war costs in Afghanistan,
and, of course, sequestration.

And DoD says it will use its limited authority to request budget reprogramming to
help plug the hole in its overseas contingency account.

None of that flexibility will be used to mitigate the impacts of sequestration,
said Ashton Carter, the deputy defense secretary.

"We'll be urging Congress to approve that reprogramming quickly, but it won't be
enough," he told reporters at the National Press Club Tuesday afternoon. "We'll
still have to make large cuts in training and maintenance, which are seriously
harming readiness."

Under current law, DoD can ask for permission to shuffle around up to $7.5 billion
within its $605 billion 2013 appropriation. Carter said the department would very
much like Congress to increase that reprogramming cap, but it's not something DoD
has formally requested since it would require Congress pass and the president sign
new legislation.

Army Chief of Staff General Ray Odierno told the House Appropriations Committee
Wednesday that two-thirds of non-deployed units will fall below acceptable
readiness standards by the end of the year.

Army Chief of Staff General Ray Odierno

"We're making sure that those who are deploying are fully trained and those who
are next to deploy will be trained, but that's at the expense of training the rest
of the Army," he said. "So we're now consuming our readiness, and we're not able
to build it back up under our current budget constraints. My concern is that our
readiness will continue to degrade this year and into fiscal 2014."

Among the Army's training cutbacks is the cancellation of seven of its 2013 combat
training center rotations. Odierno said that while brigades headed to Afghanistan
and South Korea in the short term will be fully trained, the Army will be less
ready if it's asked to respond to a contingency in, for example, Syria.

"We always develop options so that we're prepared. We'll still develop those
options, but they'll be higher-risk because of the reduction in readiness," he
said. "The risk is in lives. We'll go, but if we're not as well trained, the cost
will be more lives lost. We obviously want to avoid that."

Carter said the same is true in the other military services.

"What we're degrading is our capability to respond to the unforeseen. That's why
this sequester thing is not only stupid, it's unsafe," he said.

DoD continues to believe the cuts required by sequestration are too large, and the
Pentagon still desperately wants the across the board cuts to be abolished.

Asking for help

But now that the sequestration cuts are in place, senior leaders are imploring
Congress for three things if they're to remain in place: flexibility to implement
the cuts more intelligently, time to make their impacts less damaging and some
degree of budget stability so that the military services can make strategic
decisions about how to plan their spending.

Secretary of the Air Force Michael Donley

"We understand that defense resources are likely to come down over the next
decade, but we need Congress to sort of settle on what the numbers are. With
whatever resources you provide, I can guarantee you that we'll deliver the best
military available with that level of resources. That's what we do," Michael
Donley, the Secretary of the Air Force told the Senate Appropriations Committee
Wednesday. "The issue is we're not sure what the numbers are. To be making
decisions months at a time or weeks at a time is not efficient for the department,
and it prevents us from making the strategic decisions we'd like to make. We're
making short term decisions that last only months or perhaps a year at most."

DoD's 2014 budget proposal assumed that sequestration would be resolved for 2014
and beyond. But last week, the chairman and the ranking member of the Senate Armed
Services Committee asked
DoD to assume the opposite and to report back on what a military operating under
long-term sequestration budget levels would look like.

Carter said DoD is doing that as part of the strategic choices review Defense
Secretary Chuck Hagel ordered last month. He said the review is roughly halfway
finished and will consider a range of budget scenarios, including prolonged
sequestration.

"Much as none of us might like that, we have to take seriously the possibility
that what happened this year will happen again and again and again," he said.
"It's in our DNA to get ready, even for things that we don't like. The product
will be a clear delineation of the choices that we can make or might have to make,
whether it's in force structure or investment or compensation or health care or in
headquarters support or any of the other areas where we spend money. How can we do
things differently in order to give the country the defense it needs for the
amount of money we're going to get? That's the purpose of the review."