Death Penalty Essay

638 Words3 Pages

Death Penalty: Barbaric or Justice?
Julian Ptachin was only 14 years old in October 1997 when a drunk driver smashed into his parents van. His Dad, a physician, had to hold Julian while he died on the side of the road. The drunk driver was a three-timed convicted, repeat offender. He was convicted of second-degree murder and was ordered to serve eight years in jail. Doesn’t something seem wrong with this picture? Repeat crime convicts are running down the streets rapid: endangering our children, our loved ones, and even us.
What can us, as citizens, do to stop these heinous crimes? The Death Penalty. The Death Penalty has been around for several hundred years. One of the first people to first use the death penalty was the…show more content…

Right now Texas is practicing capital punishment and it has been working for many years. They are the only state in America that will take the life of another person for doings of wrong.
In the Allyn and Bacon Guide to Writing page 340, Edward I. Koch makes a strong statement, which compares the death penalty to cancer. In these paragraphs Koch talks about how people say that the death penalty is barbaric. He then makes the claim that giving up on cancer patients is also barbaric, due to the fact that it is not pushing the science field into finding a cure for cancer. He then states that the death penalty is not a disease but that the disease is injustice. Even though many people do not accept the death penalty, it is the only way to punish “crimes of cold-blooded murder.”
The amount of time that a person who has been sentenced for murder one serves is a maximum of 25 years in jail. A murderer can walk the streets that our kids play on in just a matter of 25 years. These murderers can have the feeling to go out and kill again anytime that they want to or even doing stupid stuff like driving drunk and end up killing a 14-year-old child. That child did not have the choice to live and die, somebody else made the choice for him already. Julian was just barely entering high school, a whole new life for a young teenager.
If I were President of the United States of America right now I definitely would be bringing up the death penalty to members of…

People opposed to the death penalty also point to the fact that over half of the countries in the world have abolished the death penalty, including all other major industrialized, democratic nations. In the five countries with the highest homicide rates that do not impose the death penalty, the murder rate is 21.6 murders per 100,000 people. In the five countries with the highest homicide rates that do impose the death penalty, the murder rate is 41.6 murders per 100,000 people ("Deterrence"). Furthermore…

Against the Death Penalty
“Murder is wrong” (“Capital Punishment”). We’ve been taught this indisputable truth since childhood. The death penalty is defined as one human taking the life of another. Coincidentally, that is a classification of murder. There are as many as thirty-six states with the death penalty, and it’s essential that they change it. The United States needs the death penalty abolished because it is filled with flaws, cruel and immoral, and is an ineffective means of deterrent…

Additionally, because the death penalty is such an ultimate decision, the number of court trials required to follow through with the sentence builds up significant costs as well. From a purely pragmatic standpoint, the elimination of the death penalty would be beneficial due to the economic ease it would bring.
The death penalty is inefficient means of punishment in both process and methodology. Due process by which criminals are tried is a lengthy and elaborate process. Convicts can make repeated…

shows that murder rates were actually higher in states with the death penalty than in states that did not have the death penalty (Death Penalty Information Center, 2010). If the death penalty is a deterrent, wouldn’t these rates be reversed? In an article published in the New York Times entitled ABSENCE OF EXECUTIONS: A special report.; States With No Death Penalty Share Lower Homicide Rates, states that states who do have the death penalty actually have higher murder rates than the national average…

that time, he finally got what he deserved” (If Death Penalty Is Abolished, What Next?). Without the death penalty, proper justice is unattainable.
In addition to serving justice where it is due, the death penalty provides a powerful deterrent to crime. H. Naci Mocan, an economist at Louisiana State University and an author of a study that finds that each death penalty carried out deters five murders said, “I personally am opposed to the death penalty, but my research shows that there is a deterrent…

A fifth rationale in opposition is that the death penalty is too expensive or too costly to taxpayers to justify its use. According to those who oppose the death penalty and certain studies, it costs more to execute a person than to keep him or her in prison for life (Death Penalty Focus, 2015). Finally, it is believed by some that the killing at the hands of the state is not a righteous act but instead is on the same moral level as the murderers themselves.
According to capital punishment supporters…

percent of the death row inmates are diagnosed with some form of mental illness.
Second, ending the death penalty would cost less, when involving the physical and emotional costs of the punishment. Within the physical aspects of the death penalty, it costs around 90,000 a year per inmate to stay on death row. The average estimated amount for each inmate, in total, is two million dollars. Death row costs almost four times as much as life imprisonment without parole. Since the death penalty costs such…

bill abolishing the death penalty. The bill ratified their 1987 Constitution which states that, “the death penalty shall not be imposed. Any death penalty already imposed shall be reduced to reclusion perpetua” (Article III, section 19(1). In Africa, only six countries continue to impose the death penalty. On September 16, 2005, Liberia acceded to the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty. Article 1.2 of…

It is irrational to think that the death penalty – a remote threat at best – will avert murders committed in drug turf wars or by street-level dealers” (Bedau). This shows that the death penalty is not stopping murders from occurring. The introduction to the death penalty conducted a survey were top criminologists stated that the death penalty does not deter homicide rates (Introduction). “For 2009, the average Murder Rate of Death Penalty States was 4.9 [Murder rates by the 100,000], while the average…

specific statements regarding death penalty.
Who should receive the Death Penalty
This fierce debate links us back to whether or not the death penalty should be used only for criminals convicted of murder? According to a recent Gallup survey conducted in (Newport,2009), when 65% of Americans continue to support the use of the death penalty for persons convicted of murder, while 31% opposed it. Nevertheless, despite a worldwide decline in the use of the death penalty, and the fact that it is outlawed…