Interview with a 9-year-old skeptic

On Friday the Dallas News published a Q&A with Mason Crumpacker. You’ll remember Mason from an earlier post as the girl who, at the Texas Freethought meetings, asked Christopher Hitchens to recommend some books; Hitch took the time to answer her in detail.

Anyway, the piece is behind a paywall, and that ticked me off a bit, so I’ll put the whole thing up here.

You’ll want to read this, for the child is amazing. It’s hard to believe, from her answers, that she’s only nine. Whatever her parents are doing, they’re doing right (and of course her genes play a role. . . .).

* * * * *

Point Person: Our Q&A with 9-year-old Mason Crumpacker

When atheists and “freethinkers” gathered in Houston this month to hear noted atheist and author Christopher Hitchens speak, Mason Crumpacker of McKinney, who just turned 9, drew international attention by asking Hitchens a question about what books she should read. Points recently caught up with Mason and her parents to ask some questions of our own. Note: This is a longer version of the Q&A in the Oct. 30, 2011, Points section of The Dallas Morning News.

What is the difference between a freethinker, an agnostic and an atheist?

An agnostic is someone who says that they can never be sure [about God’s existence], that it’s something unprovable. And they’re right. An atheist is someone who says the same thing, but they’re probably going to go with “no.” A freethinker is somebody who thinks outside of the church.

Does a freethinker not believe in God, or just not believe in religion?

It means you don’t believe in religion. … It doesn’t necessarily mean that you don’t believe in God. I don’t really believe in religion. It treats kids very badly.

How so?

When we were at the atheist convention, a man … talked about a 15-year-old who had a brain tumor, and her mom didn’t believe in modern science. So she [the child] never really got [the tumor] out. So she died. She [the mother] only believed that God would make it better.

Why did you decide to go to an atheist convention?

I thought it would be interesting to meet different freethinkers and see what they thought about the world. I just wanted to boost my intellectual curiosity.

If someone invited you to a Christian convention, or a Buddhist convention or Hari Krishna convention, would you go?

Probably. I’d like to experiment with different religions. I just like to see what they believe and see if they make sense or not.

What do you think is the role of religion in people’s understanding of right versus wrong?

Religion is a way to get their children to behave. The world is kind of scary without religion, for them because they don’t know what is going to happen.

How does a religion have to “make sense”?

If someone questions [a religious belief] and just says, how do you know this is right? The priest says: Well, it’s in the Bible, isn’t it? Everything revolves around the Bible. Some people believe that if the Bible says it, it’s true, completely true. If I do decide to believe in something, they should have further proof.

Without religion, how would children distinguish between right and wrong?

I personally think they would have their parents to guide them along the way. And if their parents were raised right, they could have an open mind, have fun and be safe.

When people went on the blogs to write about what happened between you and Christopher Hitchens, did it frighten you, considering that you live in the very religion-oriented state of Texas?

I think it’s kind of scary. Because some people can get hurt very badly over religion. That’s what happened to a lot of atheists in the United States. That’s all. Verbally and physically.

Why did you decide it was important to ask a question of Hitchens?

Because I had just found out that he was dying, and he’s a brilliant man. And I felt that his knowledge of the world shouldn’t be wasted, and that someone should continue what he started.

Where will he go when he dies?

Nowhere.

Did he answer you the way you expected to be answered?

Yes. He was very honest to me and very, very nice. I think all adults should be honest to kids with their answers and take them seriously. They’re living people, too. I especially hate when adults dumb it down for me.

Should you be treated like an adult?

I’m not sure if that’s a good thing or a bad thing. I like being taken seriously, but I’m just not ready to be an adult. I don’t want to pay taxes. I never want to do that.

So which are you, an atheist, an agnostic or a freethinker?

I wouldn’t say I’ve decided my religion yet. I’m going to kind of experiment around and see if there’s any religion I like in particular. But if I do decide to be a freethinker, the chances are very high. … I just want it all to make sense.

Is there anything that Hitchens has said or written that you don’t agree with?

I haven’t read Christopher Hitchens. I’m 9.

You used to go to a Christian school. What did you think about their lessons?

It was a Christian Montessori school. Actually, all they did was build block towers, shine mirrors and eat Chex mix. … We used to sing songs about God and Jesus and rainbows and pretty bunnies. The bunnies didn’t bother me so much.

You said you want religion to make sense. Have you ever tried looking at the teachings of the Bible and applying your own criterion: Does it make sense?

I think it’s very good to question things, for adults, children of all ages to question their beliefs and work them all out. … I personally think the story of Adam and Eve doesn’t really make sense. What proof is there of a Garden of Eden? What proof is there of God creating man and woman and giving them a tree of knowledge [whose fruit] they were not supposed to eat? It’s like saying this to a kid: OK, don’t eat the cookie on the countertop. You know what they’re going to do. They’re going to eat the cookie!

If people read this interview and tell you that you’re wrong, how would you answer them?

That people are entitled to their own beliefs. Beliefs like the Buddhists are inclined to believe that there’s a Buddha. Christians are inclined to believe that there is a Christ. And Pastafarians are allowed to believe that there is a flying spaghetti monster. I’m a pastafarianist.

Why do you think we’re here? How did we get here?

By evolution. We evolved from tiny little microscopic cells, which formatted into bigger cells, which created the first fish, who slowly evolved into lizards, who became the dinosaurs. And then [they] kind of started over again but took a different path to becoming the first mammal, which became the chimp-like creature we call Australopithecus afarensis, who slowly evolved into Homo habilis, who evolved into Homo erectus, to Neanderthals and Cro-Magnon people who slowly gave way to who we are. [She turns to her parents.] Did I do good with that? … [She then translates each into French.]

These are the kinds of questions that occupy a lot of adult thought. People might want to know: Why aren’t you busy thinking 9-year-old thoughts? Why aren’t you just enjoying your childhood?

I am enjoying my childhood. I’m kind of shocked about that. I think questioning beliefs is good for a 9-year-old, since most 9-year-olds are halfway out of the house. It’s a good time to start questioning things and questioning their beliefs and making them become good people who know a lot about the world.

When you’re not questioning your beliefs, what do you do for fun?

I like to sing, I take dancing lessons, and I also like reading. I love swimming and roller skating.

What do you like to read? Your question to Mr. Hitchens was about books.

I said I was on the seventh book of Harry Potter, and I also like The Golden Compass books by Phillip Pullman, which are kind of in response to The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.

You like that book?

Yes, despite all of the religious metaphors, it’s a really good story. … And when [Aslan] sacrifices himself on the stone table, that’s sort of like Jesus on the cross. I like the [Greek] Myths by Robert Graves. I also like Ali Finkel’s Rules for Girls , by Meg Cabot . She likes rules. It’s a book about a 9-year-old named Ali Finkle, where she has to go through a move, and her best friend is all against that and tries to prevent the move. … She makes up some rules. And the book is partly about … surviving.

Does man need to have rules?

Yes.

Some would argue that religion is really just a set of rules.

It sounds like worshiping to me.

It is, but it’s also a set of rules. Like the Jews, who believe you can’t eat crustaceans or cloven-hoofed animals. For Muslims, you have to pray five times a day. For Christians, some rules apply, and some don’t. Which is why I asked if religion helps people know the difference between right and wrong.

I just don’t believe that religion qualifies as a set of rules. I know that people believe in religion and trust it.

What’s the meaning of life?

The meaning of life is to learn, have fun and experience different things, about the miracle of life. Or maybe not the ‘miracle’ of life. …

Is it OK for the word “miracle” to just express the wonderment of life without it necessarily having a religious connotation?

Yes, I think so. Yes.

You found out a few years ago about Santa Claus. What did that do to your whole belief system?

I found out when I was 6 that he wasn’t real. I was crushed because if the image of Santa Claus isn’t there, then who is the person who gives you the presents? But then you eventually figure out that it’s your mom and dad who are [playing] Santa Claus. The Easter Bunny, the tooth fairy, I eventually found out about those, too.

Did that make you ask questions about God?

No. I really didn’t think about it that much when I found out about Santa Claus.

122 Comments

He was very honest to me and very, very nice. I think all adults should be honest to kids with their answers and take them seriously. They’re living people, too. I especially hate when adults dumb it down for me.

This. Some of the remarkable things I’ve observed as a parent is that:

(1) It’s a real challenge to b.s. a kid by skating around the truth because they’re like little trial attorneys, questioning everything over and over, matching it up against what else they’ve been told. They will spiritedly correct the smallest inconsistency or deviation.

(2) Kids respond with equanimity to difficult truths told with care and seriousnress to them by parents or other care-givers.

I’d add as a consequence of answering kids seriously is that they must be told that oftentimes parents don’t know or make mistakes with their answers and it’s the kid’s job to figure out when that happens and point it out respectfully.

Mason, if you got a kick out of the silliness of Genesis, you’d really enjoy G. John. Start with the story of Lazarus, where Jesus reanimates a stinking corpse over the protestations of the dearly departed’s family. When you get to the story of Doubting Thomas, ask yourself not only how much sense it makes that Jesus would be walking around with gaping holes in his hands, feet, and chest, but what it says about him as a person that he would want to have somebody fondle his intestines through that gaping chest wound.

How would you react in such a situation? And what would you think if sombebody insisted that you must eat the body and drink the blood of Jesus else you’ll face eternal torture?

John 20:25 The other disciples therefore said unto him, We have seen the LORD. But he said unto them, Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and thrust my hand into his side, I will not believe.

Mason’s a smart and wonderfully clear-thinking child. I am, however, hoping this is the last we’ll hear from her for a long while. Elevating children to celebrity status creeps me out – even great kids like her.

I don’t think it’s gone too far, yet. Local newspapers frequently print stories about kids who make news. I suspect that by the next week, most will have forgotten. I agree there is some cause to worry about increasing exploitation; but perhaps the same combination of bright kid + nurturing parents that has brought her this far will be able to handle the danger appropriately.

Usage of “skeptic” has changed over time. Early Greek academic skepticism and pyrrhonian skepticism held that nothing could be known for certain. That was in the days before the scientific method was well-developed. Modern scientific skepticism holds that belief should be apportioned according to evidence.

Really? Which came first, the belief that man evolved from an ape-like ancestor, or the fossil of the ape-like ancestor that the belief was based upon? Oh yeah, I guess that’s why they are called “missing links.” Aren’t you glad we have all those thousands of clearly defined fossils in transtion from one kind of life form to another, and have all those life forms walking around today that we can observe that are in transition. I agree though, belief should be apportioned according to evidence. Too bad it isn’t.

Mason, I love the part where you said “I haven’t read Christopher Hitchens. I’m 9.” Also the part about leaving the cookie on the counter. That’s brilliant. You handled his questions wonderfully. Congratulations on a job very well done!

The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe…You like that book?Yes, despite all of the religious metaphors, it’s a really good story. … And when [Aslan] sacrifices himself on the stone table, that’s sort of like Jesus on the cross.

The Dallas Morning News is indeed behind a paywall, but reader comments are not. You can view those HERE

I am surprised & relieved that besides Anne Crumpacker’s own comment, there are only five other comments/replies ~ all of them favourable. It’s 11:40am there maybe ther’ll be more when the flock leaves the good shepherd & returns to their homes.

Haggis, haven’t I seen you somewhere before? Perhaps on the irreverent, hilarious Jesus and Mo’ comic strip webpage?

Yes, the young lady comported herself with calm, dignity, and a bright smile when she spoke with Mr. Hitchens. She is quite something.

Kids are like this, when adults around them don’t (unconsciously, perhaps) manipulate them into retaining the babyhood they should so quickly exceed. Even when they are being overly babied, an adult addressing them with proper dignity and full honesty can bring out the maturity, at times. I’ve done so, with those as young as 2 years old, in the ER with a broken arm. The parents calm, when the kids do, and the kids calm when they feel properly attended to rather than thrown around like the proverbial sack of potatoes.

The faitheists and accommodationists are correct after all. Fundamentalists of the religious kind but also communists, femminists, conservatives and other ideological groups love to parade child their prodigies around.

These kids usually just repeat what they have been told, or what the have overheard, in order to impress adults. Such kids are certainly ahead of their age in terms of their verbal skills.

But there is no indication that this girl’s beliefs are based on her own genuine insights.

At her age I personally had already rejected, what I now know to be, Thomas Aquinas’ five proofs. I rejected the notion that God was necessary or important in creating the universe or species. I rejected the notion that catholic doctrine represents God’s manual for how to live life on the grounds that other religions exists and God doesn’t bother to set the record straight.

But I would have put all of this in children’s terms. I didn’t know about the words “atheism”, “freethought” or “skepticism” until long after I had rejected the existence of God entirely.

I furthermore wouldn’t have related my insights in terms of general theory but rather in relation to specific claims made in songs, religious instruction or sermons.

I didn’t confide my skepticism to adults, including my non-religous parents, who took me only to church whenever we visited our rural relatives or on christmas. I discussed my skepticism exclusively with like-minded kids who too suspected that there was something fishy about this catholicism business. But we understood that this was a taboo subject and that religious practice was what people were supposed to do in order to prove their respectability in society.

A certain share of kids are and have always been skeptics, but they wouldn’t express themselves in terms of contemporary, new atheist jargon.

Anyway, the Christians are going to have a field day with her, if she converts to Christianity in a couple of years because she falls in love with a boy from a Christian youth group or something.

It is sad to see, but as Atheism gets to be increasingly mainstream, we are going to to see more of such pathetic displays of self-affirmation that were hitherto exclusively practiced in the religious camp.

My parents didn’t thought police me. Where did you get that impression from?

I used to read about Ships, Tanks, Dinosaurs and Commodore C64 programming manuals and Asterix at the time.

“atheism” is not new atheist jargon. I should have probably said “new atheist themes” in addition to “jargon”.

Let’s engage in some literary criticism:

“What proof is there of God creating man and woman and giving them a tree of knowledge [whose fruit] they were not supposed to eat? It’s like saying this to a kid: OK, don’t eat the cookie on the countertop. You know what they’re going to do. They’re going to eat the cookie!”

The cookie on the countertop analogy is classically new atheist. I’ve heard it on the Infidelguy’s show years ago.

“And Pastafarians are allowed to believe that there is a flying spaghetti monster. I’m a pastafarianist.”

Only few people outside of the new atheists have ever heard about pastafarianism, let alone use it to convey a point, or think it’s convincing or clever.

“I wouldn’t say I’ve decided my religion yet. I’m going to kind of experiment around and see if there’s any religion I like in particular. But if I do decide to be a freethinker, the chances are very high. … I just want it all to make sense.”

The notion that children should engage in a deliberate and self-concious project to rationally choose between religions and, hopefully, choose the path or identity of “freethought”, is an ideal of new atheist parenting.

At her age, I was more like Sam Harris. I simply rejected specific religious claims, as they crossed my path, but didn’t form an identity in relation to religion.

Do they even teach biblical literalism and original sin at Christian Montessori schools? I would be surprised if this was the case.

The bulk of New Atheist argumentation is made in opposition to biblically literalist fundamentalist evangelicalism. It appears that her assumptions about Christian beliefs come indirectly from New Atheist sources.

Dude, did it ever occur to you that maybe she’s just smarter than you were at that age?

And Pastafarianism is not something that few people who aren’t New Atheists have heard of, it’s been around for about a decade and it’s managed to get itself around quite a bit since then. Quite frankly, that statement is like claiming that Dungeons & Dragons is something only nerds who still live in their parents’ basements know about- a stereotype that isn’t remotely based off reality.

The notion that children should engage in a deliberate and self-concious project to rationally choose between religions and, hopefully, choose the path or identity of “freethought”, is an ideal of new atheist parenting.

So, how far ahead of my time were my parents and I when I did just that in the 1940’s?

The notion that children should engage in a deliberate and self-concious project to rationally choose between religions and, hopefully, choose the path or identity of “freethought”, is an ideal of new atheist parenting.

Yeah? So how do you explain those of us who were parenting this way long before the concept of ‘new atheism’ arose?

I went through this myself around age 10 (maybe something in the dallas water) and thought and spoke at the same level. I think that she’s got her mind in the right direction: open to new possible things.

In response to Dieter: I don’t how long it has been since you were 9, and I don’t know if you have raised children yourself, but some points you state sound overly skeptical of Mason’s understanding of her world and the extent of parental involvement with her choice of words.
What this interview showed me was the potential advantage for providing children younger than Mason a quality education.
I raised two boys myself, one deciding to become a Christian at the age of 18, and the other continually exploring scientifically based reasoning of the universe. After a few years, my Christian son moved away from Biblical dogma on his own.

Nobody learns in a vacuum, so of course Mason’s parents and other influential people in her life are helping her to build her own concepts and philosophies of the universe, as it should be.

The remarkable thing about this interview is that Mason demonstrates an ability that I believe many children her age possess, but of which is rarely publicized; the ability to understand concepts such as evolution, mythology and religious dogma, and the confidence to ask questions. This type of unbridled curiosity may have genetics at the start, but her environment (and her people) deserve credit as well.

dieter,
I share some of your concerns. The extent to which the new atheist interwebz are all over her every utterance is out of proportion. The things she says are certainly some of her own thoughts mixed with stuff she simply picked up. Some of it may change, some of it may stay. She’s pretty smart for her age.

The fact that she so comfortably uses the vocabulary and phrases required to discuss religion and atheism, while not heaving read advanced atheist “grownup” literature at all, means that she must have explicitly discussed those topics in those exact terms with her parents, and some of her ideas are certainly heavily influenced or simply mirror some of the things her parents have said or lead her towards. N

ot that I have a problem with that, I find it wonderful if she has that kind of intellectual stimulation, but us gasping with excitement every time she drops a smart line, that leaves a bad taste. She is not a messianic figure for all those who need reassurance that atheism is good, nor is she the monkey that has been taught to hold a cane and wear a top hat. Maybe it’s a difference of cultures, USians have more of a tendency to put kids in the spotlight and glorify them than EUians, and that might be the origin of my doubts.

Because being an “honest searcher of truth” means starting out with preconceptions of how the world works based on what you learned in Sunday school and ignoring anything that doesn’t match that, apparently.

Well said, the term, we are our parents keepers is a fact of life. We grow up to understand life as we are given it. The fact that she is 9 shows that this is what she is given to learn at that age.
As for religion, as she gets older, of course, she will make her mind up in what to believe. For now, she has a headstart to see what many others her age may never see…a world of many different cultures in life.

Her response here was clearly not based upon knowledge. This is something you are either taught to believe, or you choose to believe. It’s too bad people can’t stick to what they actually know, and keep an open mind.

Right, and if I say the Ghost of Christmas Past doesn’t live in my attic, that’s just something I choose to believe. If I were really keeping an open mind and sticking to things I know, I wouldn’t say that. Thanks for keeping us on our toes.

Sheldon Cooper attempted to build a nuclear reactor at age ten. He also grew up with a fundie mother and an abusive alcoholic father.

I have seen Jim Parsons live in person many years ago at Stages Rep in Houston. He went on to become a regular at the Alley Theatre.

Stage actors seldom do well on television, but sometimes they are perfect in TV comedy. The broad gestures and exaggerated expressions that work on the stage seldom work in television, but for Parsons playing Sheldon, they work.

Same thing with Katherine Helmond, who is a BOI (Born On The Island, a hardcore Texas credential). She had been doing Broadway for twenty years before she got the role of Jessica Tate in Soap.

I’d like to experiment with different religions. I just like to see what they believe and see if they make sense or not.

I would encourage investigation, but I’m not sure that I would go so far as to advocate experimentation. Some cults are too dangerous to mess around with. Scientology, for example. They have been quite vicious in going after former Scientologists. It is possible to find out enough about Scientology from a distance to know that it does not have an inside track on the truth.

Nothing in Scientology is really any nuttier than the stuff in mainstream Christianity (except the degree of aggression exhibited against people they don’t like), but people* are used to Christianity and not Scientology, so they thing Scientology’s the weird one.

*By people I mean those of us who’ve grown up in a country with Christianity as the predominant religion, like the US.

From Mason’s mother:
What you are witnessing is the messy act of parenting. Sometimes we get it right and sometimes we get it wrong. If you ask Mason the same set of questions next month she may give you different answers and that is the point. She is exploring her own thoughts. We have been called simultaneously “wishy-washy accommodationists” and “militant atheists” Goes to prove you can make some of the people happy some of the time. The religious right certainly seem to have the upper hand where we live in Texas, but Mason’s simple “I don’t see it” attitude has sparked a local debate. The story of the “Emperor’s New Clothes” has been on my mind a lot during the last few weeks.

We’ve gotten many emails today from both sides, but I thought I’d through the WIET crew this latest one for a bit of fun. Bon appetit!

*************************
Gentlemen,
I would like to make some observations for Miss Crumpacker to consider in her search for meaning and truth.

First, how can Miss Crumpacker know with certainty that Mr Hitchens will go nowhere when he dies? There are many documented stories of people who died and went somewhere.

Secondly, on the issue of determining right or wrong actions with no moral absolutes, Miss Crumpacker states that that would be governed by ones parents being raised right. But what is ‘right’ with no moral absolutes? Suppose the parents were raised to believe in incest and rape of their children? Would that be ‘right’? If not, why not, if that’s what the parents truly believed. You can’t steal morals from Christianity and leave out God -that makes no logical sense. If morals are relative, then the logical extension of that, short of a military dictatorship, is moral chaos and the collapse of any culture, as everyone will do what they think best for themselves. You can’t logically have it both ways-no God, but use of God’s morality.

Thirdly, Miss Crumpacker’s explanation of how we got here is very incomplete. Even Charles Darwin said he didn’t have a clue about how life started. Miss Crumpacker’s explanation presupposes life already, so that doesn’t answer Mr Robberson’s real question which was “How did we get here?”. No matter how far we take this question back, we are faced with the ultimate question of where did the universe come from along with all the matter and energy, and the intricately interconnected laws of physics, biology, mathematics, chemistry, incredible order and balance in the universe, etc? How did the DNA obtain the information that is packed within it? In fact how did information evolve at all? Miss Crumpacker did not address those questions.

Fourthly, she should ask herself how many hospitals, orphanages, soup kitchens, elder care facilities, red cross groups, etc do atheists operate? On the other hand how much carnage has been wreaked on mankind by atheists in just the last century? Estimates indicate over 100,000,000 people have died at the hands of atheists, and that number does not include the maimed, family misery, and property destruction that has come with these wanton murders.

Finally, an open challenge to Miss Crumpacker and all atheists out there-prove beyond a shadow of doubt that there is no God.

The truth is, God loves Miss Crumpacker, and no amount of her unbelief will make Him, or His love for her disappear……
************************
This email was signed, but I have removed the identifiers.

“What you are witnessing is the messy act of parenting. Sometimes we get it right and sometimes we get it wrong. If you ask Mason the same set of questions next month she may give you different answers and that is the point. She is exploring her own thoughts”

If I may, I’d like to address answers to the emailer’s questions, just in case Mason finds them helpful (and you find them worthy of sharing with her).

“First” [sic], Mr. Hitchens, himself, has answered the question of where he will go when he dies. He is reknowned for his knowledge, education, sharp mind and critical reasoning skills, all so far beyond most of us, particularly adults, that believing his assessment of his future is like believing Einstein’s story of E=mc2. We can’t all know everything, so we must judge whose expertise is above our own and should be trusted (until and unless proven otherwise).

“Secondly”, morals are merely standards of behavior balancing survival of the species and survival of the individual. As for God’s morals, one example is a pregnant woman who must have an abortion or die. There are believers in God and His morals who say, “No” to abortion, leaving the situation “in God’s hands”, when experts know for certain that death will result. I chose the experts, with knowledge based on reality, evidence, and understandings of health that are deliberately, constantly questioned in order to improve them. God’s morals, on the other hand, are twisted by God, Himself: “Do not sacrifice a human! Abraham, do not, after all, sacrifice your son! But, later, I’ll go against all of that in ways that make no legitimate sense at all.”

“Thirdly”, you aparently believe in an explanation of origins that is also incomplete: God. Who created God? Where did God come from? If, as you insist, everything came from something, then God came from something, too.

“Fourthly”, when has an atheist ever murdered millions in the name of atheism? Catholics had the Inquisition. Protestants and Catholics had the Holocaust (with Nazi belt buckles engraved, “Gott mit uns”, meaning, “God with us.”) Charitable organizations tend to be in the hands of the largest groups, so as religions threatened and cajoled others, the way you, dear sir, are trying to manipulate Miss Crumpacker, there were few if any others to organize into large, strong charities. If anything, the Jews, working for racial freedom in the 1950s, workers’ rights at the dawn of American unions, and even hospitals where they could practice because Christians, not so long ago, locked them out of Christian hospitals. (See Jewish Hospital in Louisville, Kentucky, for example). Christian charities, in particular, are referred to as “ministries” for a reason. “Starving? Sure, we’ll open a food bank and feed you, but you have to accept our beliefs and behaviors, if you don’t want to starve.”

The truth is, those who believe in God, or any god or gods at all, cannot agree, so if there is one God, why are there so many adamant versions?

And as for God’s love, Mason is doing just fine with the love of her family and her own apparent love of truth.

Amazing! I am speechless! My daughter has been confused about religion, but she only knows what she has been exposed to which has been minimal, because I do not want to confuse her. Her parents are very wise and educated. Fear is the worst part us and will make us hide behind entities to act upon. The reality is that people make decisions. If you think you can judge what this little girl and what she has expressed beautifully and can psycho-analize with “God loves her” I’d say which one?! and shame on you for picking on a smart little girl but you have to run and hide because it was wrong to do! (your choice)

Mason? I read in a Steven Pinker book that Madison was the most common girl’s name. These are last names, and even contain “son”. What’s up with this trend? (Of course, in a country where the Secretary of State has a name based on a mis-spelling, and poor Rena Coleman had to tell her teachers every year at the roll call at the beginning of the year “it’s ReNAY”, I suppose anything is possible.)

I like her answer to the ‘meaning of life’ question🙂 Most adults would stumble at that question.

Well done to her. Her parents have done a good job, she’s a credit to them.

I agree that all children should be told the truth when they ask a question. Of course you should choose your words carefully when there is a delicate matter involved, but the truth is the truth and it’s important.
Like adults, children also get upset to learn that they’ve been lied to.

Never even heard of this child before, I’m going to seek this meeting where she asks him a question.

I say that I am Gnostic because knowledge about myself, how my mind works perceiving reality, and how I express my thoughts in words, is the most important aspect of moving through the maze of the world, and knowing how the world works is important for me to know how to do things that are constructive rather than destructive. Knowledge of the world and myself is the essence of what the whole enterprise of religious groups should be about, elevating the level of my personal consciousness.

I read with great sadness the interview with young Mason Crumpacker. She is obviously
a bright and thoughtful girl, who is beng led down the wrong path at such an impressionable
age. The miracle of God’s creation, how precise and beautiful it is, did not just happen.
Every one of us has a void in our life that can only be filled with a personal relationship
with Almighty God through His son Jesus Christ. The Bible clearly states that “the fool
says in their heart there is no God,” no matter what their age.
Anton Skell
(I have removed his address and phone number)
**********************
Quick name search leads to “Roaring Lamb’s Ministry.” Mr. Skell is a board member.

********************
From “Roaring Lamb’s Ministry”
Amplify Your Faith
What does it mean to AMPLIFY YOUR FAITH?

It means putting on the whole armor of God according to Ephesians Chapter 6, listening to the Holy Spirit for direction, and engaging the enemy on the battlefield! It means making a difference for Christ right where you are!

IT’S TIME TO ROAR!

Amplify Your Faith Without Ever Leaving Home!

You never have to leave home to be a Roaring Lamb. Now, you can reach people in every nation by becoming an online missionary.

Every day, more than 2 Million people around the world are searching for God and answers to life’s deepest questions on the internet. By just setting aside a few minutes each day, you can reach them with the Gospel at home in front of your computer.

Join thousands of other Roaring Lambs through this Global Media Outreach, and click here to learn more and apply.Once your application is processed and approved, you will be placed in a training community and given all the tools to succeed. Even if you have never felt comfortable sharing your faith face to face, you will learn so much and grow in your faith by sharing and discipling people through being an online missionary. Join us today!

Heh, every time some bible thumper starts pulling the “the fool says in his heart” line, I always shoot back that I’m alright, then, because I don’t say things with my heart, I say them with my mouth. My heart’s reserved for powering my circulatory system.

She is correct when she says that one cannot merely believe something because the Bible says so. St. Augustine said 1600 years ago: “I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.”

Why is it considered astounding that a 9 year old asks questions about the world around her and the beliefs that drive some people in that world? For me that is absolutely normal for a 4 year old, let alone a 9 year old with some level of education, access to media and ability to see and listen to what is happening around her.

Has American education lost its way so thoroughly that this is not possible anymore? That students are required to accept unquestioningly what they are told? Shades of the Chinese education system!!

[…] very hard as a team to grow a successful medical practice and we were afraid that Mason’s candid interview might cause our patients to blot. My husband specializes in the treatment of Alzheimer’s […]

[…] Mason Crumpacker: Because I had just found out that he was dying, and he’s a brilliant man. And I felt that his knowledge of the world shouldn’t be wasted, and that someone should continue what he started. (Dallas Morning News) […]

[…] and tales chosen to nurture imagination and logic for both children and their grown ups.…Why did you decide it was important to ask a question of Hitchens?Because I had just found out that he was dying, and […]

[…] I found out about Zach’s petition to the Dallas Morning News when Mason was featured in the editorial section. Here’s the problem. The Texas Faith Blog is an online opinion blog covering religion. The […]