Could we create a warning system telling users that a band is already in the queue after this message? I submitted a band named "Novus Ordo" and some user submitted his draft, unaware of my submission.

Webmasters, could you please add the length for band names? This band has such a long name that in order to write it complete, one has to omit some spaces, which results in a very weird form. I reported it and was told that it was because the restraint of the maximum length for a band name.

Webmasters, could you please add the length for band names? This band has such a long name that in order to write it complete, one has to omit some spaces, which results in a very weird form. I reported it and was told that it was because the restraint of the maximum length for a band name.

I've asked HellBlazer to increase it yesterday, it should get done soon.

Phew! I was beginning to think that my sleep deprivation was making me see things. At first sight it seems that it could improve the reading a bit on the reviews as it stretches the paragraphs more but I'll have to get back on that matter later.

One thing that sticks out on the "home" is that the MA logo now seems a bit out of place as it is aligned to the left. Maybe it would be better centred? Just a thought.

Erh, not a chance, mate. Centring the element would be a major inconsistency in the design - users would start to get a bit disconcerted by the sudden loss of balance. Trust me, you think you wouldn't notice anything now, but after browsing the site with the logo glaring at you in the centre of the page... it'd start throwing you off.

The existing placement's perfectly fine. Think of the juncture between the logo and control panel as one of those square metal braces that you often see ornamenting the corners of an old leather-bound encyclopaedia.

I was actually thinking about it being centred in the announcement's frame, it would be aligned between the number of bands and Encyclopaedia in that "There are currently 86583 bands, 222295 registered users and 68801 reviews in Encyclopaedia Metallum.", so that you can see what I'm talking about.

It doesn't bother me much and if it goes against the natural order of things I'll just need to grow accustomed to it. I have a thing (call it a paranoia, eh) with symmetries.

If you go to "My Reports" section, you see that by default the oldest reports appears first, and in order to see your most recent report, one has to scroll down or click "Date" tab. I think it's better to list the most recent reports first and older one later. Although it just saves one click, but still better.

If you go to "My Reports" section, you see that by default the oldest reports appears first, and in order to see your most recent report, one has to scroll down or click "Date" tab. I think it's better to list the most recent reports first and older one later. Although it just saves one click, but still better.

Well, one click may be nothing, but I think it's better that the older reports show first, because they are the ones that haven't been resolved/closed yet, so that more attention gets brought to them. Otherwise, those reports may just get buried and accumulate overtime. No wants to see a bazillion reports pending again.

If you go to "My Reports" section, you see that by default the oldest reports appears first, and in order to see your most recent report, one has to scroll down or click "Date" tab. I think it's better to list the most recent reports first and older one later. Although it just saves one click, but still better.

Well, one click may be nothing, but I think it's better that the older reports show first, because they are the ones that haven't been resolved/closed yet, so that more attention gets brought to them. Otherwise, those reports may just get buried and accumulate overtime. No wants to see a bazillion reports pending again.

There are four tabs in My Reports. For Unassigned or Assigned, older one should appear earlier. But for Resolved and Closed, recent ones should appear earlier. Opinions?