CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:

Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.

To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.

Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.

When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.

Thank you Winston and the feeling was mutual . Unfortunately on CD there are a fair proportion of extremely aggressive and sadly American theists who like this cowardly creature get others to attack another on their behalf .

Decent Americans never resort to bully boy tactics like this coward who posts debate after debate attacking atheists , Muslims , homosexuals and anyone who's different

The majority of people accept Evolution as fact as the evidence in support is overwhelming, I came across this interesting piece from the pew research center it makes for rather sad reading .....

Of all the major religious groups in the U.S., evangelical Protestants are among the most likely to reject evolution. According to the Center’s Religious Landscape Study, a solid majority (57%) of evangelicals say humans and other living things have always existed in their present form. (About half of Mormons and roughly three-quarters of Jehovah’s Witnesses also reject evolution.) These views are largely mirrored by the positions of large evangelical churches, as well as, in many cases, by majorities of their members. For instance, majorities of those who affiliate with the Southern Baptist Convention (58%) and the Seventh-day Adventist church (67%) reject the idea that human beings evolved over time. By contrast, much smaller minorities of mainline Protestants (30%), Catholics (29%), Jews (16%) and the religiously unaffiliated (15%) share this view.

But the Italian would never attack Christians your hypocrisy is dully noted !You Leftist never have a clue as to what you assume of others !

The majority of people accept Evolution as fact as the evidence in support is overwhelming, I came across this interesting piece from the pew research center it makes for rather sad reading .....

Of all the major religious groups in the U.S., evangelical Protestants are among the most likely to reject evolution. According to the Center’s Religious Landscape Study, a solid majority (57%) of evangelicals say humans and other living things have always existed in their present form. (About half of Mormons and roughly three-quarters of Jehovah’s Witnesses also reject evolution.) These views are largely mirrored by the positions of large evangelical churches, as well as, in many cases, by majorities of their members. For instance, majorities of those who affiliate with the Southern Baptist Convention (58%) and the Seventh-day Adventist church (67%) reject the idea that human beings evolved over time. By contrast, much smaller minorities of mainline Protestants (30%), Catholics (29%), Jews (16%) and the religiously unaffiliated (15%) share this view.

Darwin you mean to say you were not attacking those you see as different. It's apparent you are a cowardly creature that just can't keep a story straight.

You truly are hilarious I use figures from your country regarding stats , I'm attacking no one I'm stating as fact if you deny evolution you're ignorant just like you , also it's really funny you call me a coward and tell me I'm attacking people who are different what do you do on a daily basis you dumb fuck .... attack Muslims so using your logic you're a cowardly fuck .... 👌

The Roman Catholic Church accepts The theory of Evolution you idiot .....

In his encyclical Humani generis (1950), my predecessor Pius XII has already affirmed that there is no conflict between evolution and the doctrine of the faith regarding man and his vocation, provided that we do not lose sight of certain fixed points. ... Today, more than a half-century after the appearance of that encyclical, some new findings lead us toward the recognition of evolution as more than a hypothesis. In fact it is remarkable that this theory has had progressively greater influence on the spirit of researchers, following a series of discoveries in different scholarly disciplines. The convergence in the results of these independent studies—which was neither planned nor sought—constitutes in itself a significant argument in favor of the theory.[46]

From what I've seen he's made some good arguments but he likes to mess with the overbearing Christians here, as do I. It's very entertaining. However that doesn't mean he isn't a good debater, when you get down to it he knows his stuff and he provokes thoughts.

Thank you Vermink , its laughable to call this mob Christians in it's fun to toy with them 😉

I don't know if you've read my total destruction of their poster boy for the anti Evolution side as in Lich Potato have a look over on my latest debate , he at least can string a sentence or two together but also resorts to lying to bolster his weak claims ; I've posted up examples of his previous statements and his latest denials , its too easy at times 👌😉

Definitely a good read :) to be honest it's funny how the creator is trying to demote your​ credibility as a debater yet he's made this unprofessional debate trying to attack you :P it's funny that it's back fired and you have more supporters!

Yes. He's debated me multiple times, brought evidence to support his position and responded to the evidence I presented to support mine. Though we agree and disagree on things it's never been uncivil, but it has been entertaining and thought provoking.

Disagreeing is part of the fun in this site. It lends to some interesting conversations and opens different sides that maybe neither of us considered before. So my question at this point is, does creating a debate, that calls someone out specifically, hurt the person or make them stronger? Because it seems like a debate created to trash someone is made with sour grapes.

Hi Mint , I've had six debates with me as the topic in hand over the last year , its the last tragic throw of the die for the school yard bully type who attempt to get a mob to support them .

Unfortunately all except one was a so called American Christian making a mockery of decent American Christians it's my privilege to know ( like you ) , last week after the despicable Jeffrey from Ghana wished death on my daughter he yesterday wished I would commit suicide proving what a low creature he is , last year he said women enjoyed being raped and he called white women pigs ; unfortunately that's the level of this gang of cowardly bullies .

I've only had one, and it was so sweet, he was trying to have a go at me but he took it down when it didn't have the effect he wanted. I kind of feel like you really have to get under someone's skin for them to create a debate that trashes another, it's not really in the spirit of this site either but hey, they can do as they wish.

Bronto and I disagree quite often but I don't think he's a bad person. I mean he's made a debate himself to say he's a troll but he does have interesting points.

And yes, what Jeffrey said was especially vile and the fact that he doesn't see it shows how far gone he is in his anger and hate. I don't like saying that about people but that was a show of his personality that I don't think he would want the world to see. Once again, I am sorry for that. It is not how a Christian should act or be and he actually elevated my opinion of another debater on here that I have issues with but who, to my knowledge, has never made such a vile prayer.

Probably because he either doesn't actually have a Pastor, or he knows he wouldn't if he did. He's said it himself in a debate about high IQ's, The things i say on CD no one who knows will believe it came from me.

Which is kind of why I like Bront though, he even bans Saint so although he admits to being a troll, he does have funny moments and will call out and ban the real bs'ers. Ya know? I feel kind of bad for Jeffrey, I really wonder if he has a disorder of some kind. And I'm not saying that to be mean, just wondering where the disconnect is.

*Edit, kind of feel bad, not really fully or even partially, just a little bit of me wonders.

I will admit to poking Saint from time to time, his reactions are predictable but funny. I mean, according to him since I am a friend of a witch I must by association BE a witch as well.....it's gotta be my witchy side. Lololol.

Dermot might could argue the best way to make a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Beyond that, he has no idea what he is talking about, nor can he provide links or citations to support his claims. That's the exact way to debate if you want to be a poor debater.

All that I have seen dermot do so far is insult people and give poor arguments, if you can call them arguments. I just don't think he/she/it knows hows to debate. It's probably a 12 year old child based on its temperment and childlike vocabulary.

Darwin has a problem understanding it's own words take a look at it's response to this post and then take a look it's post on religion. The confusion is so obvious that it has a hard time with reality and words.