Airplanes, cats, guns, war, the more than occasional rant about the kleptocracy of President Stable Genius and his party of treason, the spinelessness of the Democraps and ramblings about anything else that flits through the somewhat offbeat mind of an armed lesbian pinko as she slides down the Razor Blade of Life.Caveat lector.

Words of Advice:

"Never Feel Sorry For Anyone Who Owns an Airplane."-- Tina Marie

"If Something Seems To Be Too Good To Be True, It's Best To Shoot It, Just In Case." -- Fiona Glenanne

"Flying the Airplane is More Important than Radioing Your Plight to a Person on the GroundWho is Incapable of Understanding or Doing Anything About It." -- Unknown

"There seems to be almost no problem that Congress cannot, by diligent efforts and careful legislative drafting, make ten times worse." -- Me

The folks Mueller is hiring are not good for president four-year-old or anyone else in his orbit who isn't as clean as the driven snow. It seems kinda dumb to me, to pick these fights with the very people who can turn your whole world upside down and shake it until something ugly falls out. He had to know that is what they do. Everyone knows that, as he would say.

So... the trump supporters here are using the argument, "Don't prosecute trump for obstruction of justice, or investigate him for treason, because other crimes may have been committed, even though years of investigations revealed no evidence of such."

The whole "don't fix something because something else is broken too," is an attitude I'm familiar with, from conservatives. Bear in mind, adherence to the principle will empty all prisons and render courts, judges, lawyers and police irrelevant. Just *who* is tough on crime, again?

So B- you contend that an investigation (the action of investigating something or someone; formal or systematic examination or research) with a witch hunt (a campaign directed against a person or group holding unorthodox or unpopular views) are the same?

Trump's own words support previous testimony given by various individuals under oath that an investigation is warranted. Of course he is still innocent until/unless proven guilty, but Mueller would not be investigating without having sufficiently probative evidence that makes obstruction likelier than not. Trump's twitters made the "cloud" bigger, but didn't lift it one bit.

I don't support most of Trump's policies or his misguided efforts to make "America Great Again" such as using more "clean" coal. But I do feel he should be accorded the same legal scrutiny that any individual would be held to when their actions raise questions of legality, purpose, and constitutionality.

Nangleator, If you are referring to me with your 2:16 post, you are quite mistaken. I never said or implied that President Trump should not be investigated nor charged if that is where the evidence leads. I only believe that there are others that need investigating an being charged if that is where the evidence leads.

Thomas Ten Bears, If I am the Dennis you are referring to, I have no knowledge of SteveM nor his house.If in fact I am banned from there it would be nice to be informed of it and the reason by the person who banned me.

There is no trail of E-mails on an unsecured server, there was no sale of our uranium to Russia, and the four dead Americans in Bengazi were casualities to a highly successful coverup into the highest offices of congress of Romney and The Retards failed attempt to stage a Reaganisq October Surprise rescuing hostages the not-white man in the "white" house could not. Bullshit doesn't fly.

"Trump's own words support previous testimony given by various individuals under oath that an investigation is warranted.

Pleas, enlighten me.

What, exactly, are they accusing him of to warrant an investigation? The DNC claim that Hillary lost because he "colluded" with "the Russians"?

There has to be more than an unverified claim by a third party to warrant such an investigation. I still haven't seen anything.

No one knows if it was "the Russians" that broke into the DNC server. The DNC has REFUSED to allow it to be examined by the FBI. The only source of claim of collusion with "the Russians" is from the DNC, repeated by leftist media.

Rule No. 5: Terms of Service: Political appointees of the Obama and Bush Administrations may not read this blog unless they (i) post a comment confessing same and (ii) acknowledge that both men are war criminals. This blog may not be read by members of the Arizona Legislature.

Violation of this term is a violation of 18 U.S.C. 1030(a)(2)(C) and you're off to share a cell with Chris Christie, asswipe.

Rule No. 6: If I wanted you to write a "guest post", I'd ask you. Don't bother asking me to put one up from you. I won't. Start yer own goddamn blog.You Have Been Warned.