WHITE WOMEN FOR SALE!

White Women For Sale!

Experiments with provocative statement and the tropism of highly contrasting sights and sounds - as they are apparently difficult to ignore, this thread will take entries that might exploit this effect on behalf of White interests.

WHITE WOMEN FOR SALE!

In high school days, I was struck by an image in my history text. It was a reproduction of a Negro slave sale announcement poster from the 1800s: “Negroes For Sale!” The sense of rage that I felt at having a whole page of my high school history text devoted to this blaring image, its providing ready ammunition to instill guilt in me, has stuck with me throughout my life. The attempt to lay a guilt trip upon me, for a practice that neither I, nor my ancestors had anything to do with, was probably one of the seminal moments in radicalizing me in defiance of anti-White politics and propaganda.

On this thread I would like to invite the commentariat to contribute what they believe to be provocative, highly contrasting phrases and imagery for the purpose of tropism and radicalization. Keep it legal. We recognize that it can be an unjustly vague law, but steer clear of “incitement of hatred” as best you can. Try not to be corny. I imagine that a bit of subtlety and irony will make for a more effective statement.

Nevertheless, science evidently demonstrates that highly contrasting sights and sounds are harder to ignore. This apparently corresponds to the older parts of the brain, the limbic system, the amygdalae, etc. It is a phenomenon that has undoubtedly been used against White interests. Accordingly, it should be in our interests to use this phenomenon to protest injustice against Whites.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limbic_system: “The limbic system (or Paleomammalian brain) is a complex set of brain structures that lies on both sides of the thalamus, right under the cerebrum. It includes the hippocampus, amygdalae, anterior thalamic nuclei, septum, limbic cortex and fornix, which seemingly support a variety of functions including emotion, behavior, motivation, long-term memory, and olfaction. It appears to be primarily responsible for our emotional life, and has a lot to do with the formation of memories.”

This thread, therefore, might be looked upon as studies in provocation and the tropism of highly contrasting sights and statements - with the special aim of awakening to injustices against Whites and White nations.

We seek contrasts that provoke anger for the sense of injustice perpetrated against us, as Whites, and the guilt of the perpetrators as such.

We should look toward these categories:

1. Provocative statements, such as:

“The Honorable Elija Muhammad said that the Black man will rule.”

2. Contrasts in assertion of power by minorities juxtaposed with humility in Whites:

9. Elite White traitors as juxtaposed with the Whites that they are betraying.

e.g., Bill Gates aiding African population explosion as Whites are trashed (in many ways) through wars initiated by Zionists, conceived in Zionist interests (e.g., through “operation clean-break”, a.k.a. “project for a new American century”)

10. Backgrounding: making political statement seem taken for granted by placing it in background of photographic shot

For example, have an interracial couple in the background of a conversation by the primary actors in a scene.

The focus in the primary examples has been on in-your-face high-contrast tropism. That would correspond with the strategy of “jamming”, overloading and overwhelming the opponent’s objections.

But there is this other, more subtle kind of tropism: backgrounding. It is not merely subliminal in that the message is available to casual inspection, but it is nevertheless insidious, as the message is placed in the background of a scene while those characters in the foreground go on and talk unperturbed, with no suggestion that the message in the background is problematic - on the contrary, it is suggested in a very intimidating way that it is taken for granted; as no normal person would question it.

I have seen many instances of this in hymiewood movies and televitz through the years - viz. placing an interracial couple in the background - but it will take some doing to find examples. It is also a task to find positive examples: what do we want to place in the background as if taken for granted?

At 1:40 you see the site of the Mary Ann Nichol’s murder on what was then Buck’s Row, London; the image fades to the present day, where, by moment 2:07, you see a Muslim woman wearing a burka and emerging from the precise spot of the ripper’s crime.

Eldridge Cleaver recounted how in his younger days he purposely targeted white women for rape. Cleaver wrote, “I crossed the tracks and sought out White prey. I did this consciously, deliberately, willfully, methodically… Rape was an insurrectionary act. It delighted me that I was defying and trampling upon the White man’s law… and that I was defiling his women… I felt I was getting revenge.”

10. Backgrounding: making political statement seem taken for granted by placing it in background of photographic shot.

The focus thus far has been on in-your-face high-contrast tropism.

That would correspond with the strategy of “jamming”, overloading and overwhelming one’s opponents objections.

But there is another, more subtle kind of tropism: backgrounding.

It is not merely subliminal in that the message is available to casual inspection, but it is nevertheless insidious, as the message is placed in the background of a scene while those characters in the foreground go on and talk unperturbed, with no suggestion that the message in the background is problematic - on the contrary, it is suggested in a very intimidating way that it is taken for granted; and no normal person would question it.

I have seen many instances of this in hymiewood movies and televitz through the years - viz. placing an interracial couple in the background - but it will take some doing to find examples. It is also a task to find positive examples: what do we want to place in the background as if taken for granted?

Here is an image that almost qualifies as cunning handiwork in backgrounding by the enemies of Whites.

v. groomed, groom·ing, grooms
v.tr.
1. To care for the appearance of; to make neat and trim: groomed himself carefully in front of the mirror.
2. To clean and brush (an animal).
3. To remove dirt and parasites from the skin, fur, or feathers of (another animal).
4. To prepare, as for a specific position or purpose: groom an employee for advancement.
5. Sports To prepare (a trail) for skiers, as by packing down new snow or leveling moguls.

Recently I heard a prominent White spokesman saying that he would condemn media portrayals against non-White groups that would inspire hatred toward those groups.

While that sounds good on the surface, it rouses suspicion as to whether that position is adopted more for subjective, political reasons, rather than because it is what White audiences really need in terms of feedback.

To maintain that no group of people in the world should be controlled and exploited by others is a good and fair premise, though it is not an original, “new’ paradigm for human diversity.” Never mind.

The bone to pick is that this emphasis on purity lacks substantive advocacy of Whites.

The problem with this angle, where the reasonableness of Blacks is stressed, is that it reconstructs the Jewish and feminist misrepresentation of Blacks. It may be partly connected to the fact that kissing the ass of disingenuous White women is a time tested means by which some right-wingers seek power; therefore, we might suspect that the empowering of this quasi objectivity can play some motivation in the more “moderate” appearing White advocacy.

Give a mud-shark a bath, no harm done.

Jews have full throttle misrepresented Blacks as angels and mud-sharks as heroes. Hence, it merely valances the dis-empowering angle to suggest that we ought not bring a gun to a gun-fight and take up equal arms to portray the destructive properties of non-Whites with animating and vivifying accuracy.

Some will allege that if we do that, we are falling into the Jewish game of divide and conquer. Nonsense. Overturning the Jewish misrepresentation of Blacks is part of what it takes to counteract Jewish propaganda. It is another, concrete and heartfelt means of fighting Jewish hegemony. One might literally point out the link of Jewish responsibility to particular instances of misrepresentation of Blacks – whether Blacks are misrepresented as if they are benign; or whether instances of Black crime and antagonism to Whites are being ignored - if there is any concern that Jewish responsibility is not being acknowledged.

Nor is anti-Black rhetoric mutually exclusive to Blacks being advised to look upon Jews as their most significant enemy.

Thanks CS. It’s good to bring these things into consciousness. Whereas we could scarcely talk back regarding the psychology of screen manipulation in the days prior to Internet, now we might begin to reclaim agency and influence.

As I recall the time when “Pulp Fiction” came out, a friend of mine asked me if I wanted to see it. I told him, “no, because I already know in advance that a Hollywood movie is likely to have as a leitmotif, if not overt motif, the promotion of White women to Blacks.”

As he’d already seen the movie, he was surprised by my prescience, noting, that “yeah, come to think of it, by movie’s end one of the featured characters, a Black, is shown relaxing at poolside with his White girlfriend” (I think it was Uma Thurman)

Some years later, I had the misfortune of seeing the film. It was torture to watch this pedantic instruction manual as to how White men were supposed to become: White zombies on behalf of Blacks.

True, his money and backing comes from hymiewood, but there is no excuse for that J-brained freak.

I noticed the jews putting interracial couples in the background of movies as well - CS

Its true, its often what’s going on in the background, not what the central characters are doing. Interracial couples, mixed groups of friends, even black couples/families to remind us it’s only nasty people who think black men abandon their families.

CS - it would be easier to list films that dont promote The Agenda than to list ones that do.

I would say movies are the least worst format. TV and TV advertising are the worst. TV is aimed at women, movies are a more male medium, they have to be more careful.

Also note the hierarchy of race - asians can be displayed unsympathetically in comparison to blacks and even sometimes compared to whites. This is a useful cop out that allows the makers to pretend they aren’t pursuing an agenda. Breaking a few PC rules strengthens their hand.

London, England (CNN)—“Everywhere we go, everywhere we look, we are inundated with messages.

We don’t even have to think for ourselves. All we have to do is sit on our comfy couch and be told how to live our lives.

From how to look, what to wear, what to eat, what our homes should look like, how to meet people, what to drive, practically every facet of our lives is taken care of.

That is the power of advertising.

A good advertisement tells us we need something even before we think we do. It offers us a look into the ideal life, the ideal body, the ideal mate, all wrapped in an ideal world.

If I sound cynical I apologize. Really I’m not. I am amazed at the influence advertising has on our lives and the power these “ad men” (and women) have over us.

On “icon” this month we look at this powerful world, both from the brand’s perspective and from the perspective of the people behind the iconic commercials.

We travel to Atlanta, Georgia, the home of Coca Cola. While we were editing this piece for the show, I saw the iconic hilltop Coke ad with the song, “I’d like to teach the world to sing.” Remember that? Well, for the rest of the afternoon I couldn’t get that song out of my head. That’s the power of advertising

What began as a little syrupy drink invented by a pharmacist in 1886 has become a pop culture phenomenon. From the cosmopolitan cities of the world to the tiniest of villages, this drink has crossed cultural boundaries.

It is a mainstay on the marketing mainstream all because of advertising; because of the idea that anything can be successful if it’s packaged and sold right.

The creative giants Saatchi & Saatchi knew that and built a successful agency on that philosophy. In fact, their motto was and still is “Nothing is Impossible.”

For 40 years they have made household names of everything from detergents to airlines to politicians. If you were in Britain in the 1970s you probably remember the Conservative party ad campaign featuring the slogan “Labour Isn’t Working.” Saatchi & Saatchi were hired by the Conservative then-leader Margaret Thatcher to sell the Tory brand to the British public. And they did. Successfully.”

10. Backgrounding: making political statement seem taken for granted by placing it in background of photographic shot.

In this clip, “The Six Women That You Will Date in College”, the first women that the guy “will” (taken for granted) date is a Mulatto; and then, when the examples of women that you “will” date in college are finished, all of them a bad match (taken for granted), you join “the real world” (taken for granted) where maybe you might just get a “real girlfriend” - a Mulatto briefly appears, handing the guy a file-folder - the Mulatto woman is taken for granted as a real woman and the (problem, reaction then) synthesis of his hopes.

Another comment stood out, in particular. It’s probably not fool proof, but it seems to be another way to pursue the matter.

Comment number 92 by a guy named Mark. It is a long comment but the gist of it is a recommendation for a website that would list miscegenators and thereby not allow them to hide their past behavior; on the order of a site that tracks pedophiles.

The risk of such a site is acknowledged as is the necessary tact and veracity with which it has to be pursued.

I wonder if the idea has been followed-up.

Posted by Mark on February 17, 2007, 03:39 PM | #

“When I ask myself what can be done about some negative social phenomenon..

Fortunately, the internet makes possible a very interesting possible solution: a web site where women who miscegenate are identified, permanently, and where anyone can go and look them up.

It would have to be made explicitly clear that no one was to use that information to harass the women, that it was purely an informational source just like the web site for identifying online predators. Standards could be established, such as having to have at least a photo of the two together or something like that. But anyone could post that information. The woman would have the opportunity to post a statement denying the allegation if she liked. The details of this need to be thought out, but the principle is effective I think.

I believe that in time, the potential of this happening would put a real chill on miscengenation. The costs would be too great compared to the short-term benefits.

We don’t need to use violence to address this. We need to use one of the most powerful tools in human psychology: ostracism. People cannot stand being ostracized. “

“Black is not the color, black is strength. Power is black “- through our campaign slogan we want to draw consumers’ attention to the fact that the only original on the market Tiger Energy Drink is now in the black packaging and the manufacturer is FoodCare” - says Karolina Kowalczyk, Head of Media and Business Development FoodCare Ltd. . of o.o.

........
In minute 119 of the film, “My Cousin Vinnie”, in a scene outside the courthouse, where Vinnie (Joe Pesci) is being congratulated upon winning the case (for his Gambini cousin and his Rothenstein friend*), there is an instance of backgrounding.

Among the people are filing out of the courthouse door in the background of Vinnie (Joe Pesci), when he is being congratulated, a red head walks out closely with a black man, but there is no indication that they are a couple, just walking out closely. However, soon after, another White woman, with slightly darker red hair, is walking out more closely with another black man. One is uncertain at first blush if they are together, but then they are seen taking each others hands in the background of this moment of happiness: the stereotypical southern (in this case prosecuting) lawyer congratulates Vinnie (Joe Pesci), telling him he did a “wonderful job” in the moment that the interracial couple joins hands in the background.

BRENHAM - A Brenham man will spend the rest of his life in prison after pleading guilty to the murder of his girlfriend.

Anthony Wayne Burns, 44, shot Rachelle Nowak in February. Nowak was at the home of an elderly lady she cared for when Burns broke through the front door, chased Nowak to a back room and shot her multiple times. Burns told police he was mad because Nowak would not answer his phone calls.

Just a couple of days ago I brought you the story of Amy Strickland, entitled: Every Tweeterer’s Worst Nightmare. Strickland, an Assistant Principal at Booker T. Washington High School in Norfolk, VA, was targeted by sub-ape students and the NAACP for retweeting a joke picture showing mixed-raced teens at prom. The tagline beneath a pic of seven mixed-race couples was “Every white girl’s father’s worst nightmare Or Nah?” Those offended by the tweet decried it as racist.

And my response at the time:

It is possible that Amy Strickland is a closet White Whateverist who disapproves of race mixing - but I sincerely doubt it. In fact, I can only entertain the possibility as a hypothetical for the sake of making a larger point that later excludes that possibility. How do we know she doesn’t approve of race-mixing, or think it is cool, or do it herself, or otherwise get “turned on” by it? We don’t.

Well, now we know she does approve, because of Strickland’s apology today:

“The “tweet” appeared to me at the time to have been an attempt at good natured humor concerning mixed race couples attending a high school prom,” Strickland wrote. “Because I have two daughters who in fact did attend proms with African American dates, I casually forwarded the “tweet” last June to one of those daughters.”

Did you catch that? Strickland’s two daughters went to the prom with Negroes - so she thinks that gives her a pass! But ... prepare to initiate harm joy ... harm joy initiated ... it don’t! The easily offended are still calling upon school administrator’s to make Strickland suffer: Transfer her, punish her, do something to let us know it has not gone unnoticed,” said student Shakira Harris.

GOOD! Let the hate flow through you!

Amy Strickland, “The Mudshark Mama’, allowed both her daughters to take n**ger-dates to the prom, and all she got for her tolerance was to be smeared as a racist by the national media. You got what you deserved - n**ger-lovers’ mother!”

Her interview with Entertainment Tonight, released on Tuesday, echoed the drug and rape allegations made by actress Barbara Bowman and publicist Joan Tarshis in the past week. A former judge on reality show America’s Next Top Model, Dickinson is the highest-profile celebrity to have made her charges against Cosby public.

She said he assaulted her at Lake Tahoe, a popular resort in California, in 1982.

Their first meeting had been arranged by her agent, about a possible role for her on the sitcom The Cosby Show, Dickinson told the celebrity news show.

Cosby then called Dickinson a couple of times: once when she was in a rehab clinic, and again after she had checked out of rehab and travelled to Bali. He asked her to join him at Lake Tahoe, where he was performing, because he wanted to give her the job they had met about, and to help her with a singing career.

When she got there, they had dinner and he gave her a glass of red wine and a pill, after she said she had menstrual cramps, she told ET.

“The next morning I woke up, and I wasn’t wearing my pajamas, and I remember before I passed out that I had been sexually assaulted by this man,” she said.

The last thing she remembered before blacking out was “Bill Cosby in a patchwork robe, dropping his robe and getting on top of me”, she told ET.

Really good piece by Copyright 101 except the guy he repeatedly calls as a “hippy” is not a hippy - he is some sort of rastafarian anarchist type (rastafarianism did not exist during the hippy era). Its important, because hippies were a rebellion against the waste of White men in the draft of an arbitrary war (Viet Nam). And to criticize them as “the problem” is a sucker’s game that the right falls for. I have somehow got to finally get that message across.

If he were to call the lame White guy “rasta anarchist” or something like that I would not raise any objection

Why didnt you say that over on the blog? Im happy to change it though. Good point about hippies. How about just ‘stupid anarchist’?

The Taken For Granted thing is a good point also. Its part of something Ive long said which is that whats happening in the foreground isnt always were the action is, its often those mixed race couples in the background that we are supposed to take for granted. Are they? I hadn’t noticed etc

Cool, hopefully more normal people will be encouraged to comment here as we have taken on some direction, less beholden to the arbitrary jostling of rogue commentariat. I can’t say that I don’t bite a bit when I see a commentator going beyond the realm of European interests, but I am accountable, I can explain why, and the point is to keep MR from getting diverted and subverted.

These are matters being set-out by Hew Strachan for crying out loud, so it would be absurd for it to be ignored as my personal concern (though in the past, people like Thorn and Haller would make such absurd suggestions - that is why I had to bounce them as the antagonists to Majority Rights’ productivity that they were).

MR is different enough from the other WN sites; there need not be a competition; we are a different perspective and set of concerns. I can’t say that nobody should have, say, the Catholic site that those two might advocate, one which would encourage traditional religions to take racial matters more into account - but they are free to have that somewhere as we are free to have a free thinking site on these matters here.

One of the worst things that ever happened to America was when President Clinton allowed five companies to concentrate [= buy up] the American media. The so-called mainstream media is no longer the media. It doesn’t tell you anything. It’s a propaganda ministry—the Ministry of Propaganda.

Prince Andrew’s freaky ­financier pal Jeffrey Epstein was not only a pedophile but a bedroom bigot, too, according to a woman who claims she was his teen “sex slave.”

Epstein would bed as many as seven young girls — some as young as 12 — each day, but never black girls, Virginia Roberts told her lawyers, according to a transcript of the conversation that was filed in court.

“There was a constant influx of girls coming in and going out. And we were all very young,” Roberts said of being part of Epstein’s ever-growing teen harem for three years, ending at age 17, according to a transcript filed as part of a 2014 federal case in Palm Beach, Fla.

When lawyer Jack Scarola asked the now-30-year-old Roberts what Epstein’s preferences were when she was sent to find him new recruits, she answered, “Young, pretty, you know, a fun personality. They couldn’t be black.”

She added, “If they were any other descent other than white, they had to be exotically beautiful.”
Roberts says she was already a victim of sex abuse when she was first taken to Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion to give him a “massage.”
Modal Trigger

Virginia RobertsPhoto: Karl Larsen/Coleman-Rayner

“A close family friend has sexually abused me, and I was on the streets at 13 years old,” she told her lawyers. Soon after that, “I was picked up by a 67-year-old man named Ron Eppinger — who did exactly what Jeffrey did with me: abuse and violate my youthfulness,” she said.

Eppinger, also of Palm Beach, died in disgrace at age 78 in 2006, having served time for sex trafficking and money laundering.

“I was with him for six months . . . Jeffrey actually knew Ron, which was quite weird,” she said.

Roberts, now a mother of three in Australia, garnered headlines this month with her lascivious allegations that Epstein pimped her as a “sex slave” to Britain’s Prince Andrew.

According to what Radar Online calls Roberts’ “secret diaries,” Andrew still had his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, on his mind. “Just recently divorced, you could tell there were some fresh wounds,” she wrote.

February 2013, the Jew gossip merchant Harvey Levin led a “Crusade For Racial Equality” after his program, TMZ, reported there was a white porn star who refused to do interracial porn. The “Crusade” was composed of the Jew Levin dispatching his minions to go around agitating black porn-addicts and tapping into the tribe’s mass media network to browbeat this woman into submission.

Alexis Texas, the woman at the center of this artificially created controversy, stated that she refused to do pornography with black men because it would alienate her white audience, and thus make her “product” less profitable. Her explanation was that this was not a moral or racial decision, but a shrewd business one (the only value system accepted as legitimate in America). As Levin himself put it: “More black = Less green”.

Interracial Porn Isn’t Profitable

I looked at a list of the 50 best selling pornographic films of all time and not a single one featured interracial (describes black men and white women in the industry) scenes. In fact, the most popular female porn stars, featured in most of these best selling smut films: Jenna Jameson, Tera Patrick, Jill Kelly, Asia Carrera, Stormy Daniels and Jesse Jane, have never done a single interracial scene in their entire careers. I cross-referenced this to control for the age of internet porn, but found the same results. PornMD is a data collection project that has gathered the 10 most popular search terms on pornographic websites from all around the world, and “interracial” was not in the top 10 anywhere on the planet.

In fact, the #1 search term for most was for their own ethnicity.

In an all-encompassing study of pornography that used information collected from 10,000 participants, it was found that only 53% of female porn stars ever do interracial scenes. The researcher also made sure to report that most of those who do participate in porn with black men do it “when the time is right”, or in non-PC English, they do it as a last resort when they start getting desperate for work. To make an analogy, it would be like Nicolas Cage doing an Olive Garden commercial because he’s behind on his credit card debt: the lowest of the low amongst the lowest of the low.

Agents charge premiums to use their clients in interracial porn (since it often sinks their careers due to white male boycott), yet the films do not sell as well as non-interracial porn. This is a terrible business proposition in other words that only large companies able to off-set losses can afford.

Interracial Porn Is Political

So if the shekels are modest, at best, why is interracial porn one of the most widely produced kinds of filth? To understand, let’s start with who is pedaling it.

Looking at the top pornographic booking agencies, I was able to find a very interesting trend. Granted, all people who partake in this trade are some breed of scum, but there is a noteworthy contrast between the behavior of Jewish (motivated by both profit and political agenda) and Gentile (motivated solely by money) porn agents. LA Direct Models, one of the few “talent” managers owned by a Gentile (Derek Hays, a retired English male porn star), only offers 20% of its women for interracial scenes, while Spiegler Girls, owned by Mark Spiegler AKA Shylock (how he signs his business cards) demands that 80% of his clients participate in interracial porn.

Vivid Entertainment, which is by far the dominant force in the world of pornography, has used 80% of its “actresses” in interracial scenes and is known for churning this stuff out. Vivid was founded and is chaired by the Jew Steven Hirsch and his wife Marci Hirsch. There is no real explanation for this substanital inversion other than the fact that Jewish-owned companies go out of their way to promote this kind of pornography. The tactic is to build themselves up with intra-racial pornography, and then once they dominate the market, promote the more perverse and less popular varieties.

According to Shylock in an interview with Business Insider: “Some agents will charge a premium for girls who do interracial. But we don’t do that: it’s the same rate for non-interracial.”

Shylock goes on to cite Sasha Grey as an exception that disproves the rule regarding the career suicide of making porn with negroes, since she started off doing interracial porn and her career took off. But Grey’s fame was not organic, it was created from scratch by moguls at the top. Adult Video News (AVN), a powerful industry trade journal founded by the Jews Paul Fishbein, Irv Slifkin, and Barry Rosenblatt in the 1980’s, helped put Grey on the map by awarding her with the title of “Performer of the Year” in 2008–a year in which she starred in an enormous amount of interracial porn movies.

Grey was the youngest person (20 years old) to ever win the “prestigious” award, and while she had been in the industry for barely two years, her enthusiastic race-mixing paid off and Jews eventually rewarded her with a laughable Hollywood career. Parallel to her in AVN “achievement” is the equally famous black male Lexington Steele, who won AVN’s “Performer of the Year” numerous times (virtually unheard of for a male porn star) and has enjoyed cameos (read: promotion) in non-pornography such as (Jew) Jenji Kohan’s Showtime series Weeds. Lexington Steele’s fame is smoke and mirrors to compel women ambivalent about making interracial porn to piggyback off his fame when their job offers start drying up.

This dynamic can go in reverse as well, or at least they try to will it. By 2013, it became obvious that Miley Cyrus, once a wholesome child star that a whole generation of kids grew up with, was willing to do anything for publicity. Her infamous antics have gotten her lots of promotion from the Jewish media who reward her by artificially lengthening her career (similar to retired supermodel Heidi Klum getting her own TV show after she got with Seal), and like sharks who smell blood, Jews saw an opportunity to exploit her weakness.

A porn company called GameLink, whose founder, CEO, and President is an ardent Zionist and Israeli-“American” dual citizen named Ilan Bunimovitz, sent Miley Cyrus a letter shortly after her “Wrecking Ball” performance. The inquiry offered her $1 million dollars to star in an interracial pornography scene. A GameLink representative expounded on the company motives behind this offer:

“I’d love to see her with Mandingo doing an interracial scene. Now that would really break the daddy’s girl image and burn through the tabloids.”

Typical, the Zionist Jew Ilan Bunimovitz, who is married to a hideous kinky haired Jew broad (look him up on Facebook), has a seemingly “normal” bat-faced family and spends half of his year in Israel, is very dedicated to promoting interracial porn to Gentiles and exploiting other people’s women for his sick ambitions. On the GameLink website, where interracial porn is aggressively marketed, it states the following:

“Although the 20th century was a time of turbulent and rapid change in race relations, mostly for the better, interracial sex is still touted as one of the great taboos. “Interracial” in the world of adult entertainment has come to connote, almost exclusively, relationships or sex between whites and blacks”

This fluffy talk purposely omits that interracial porn is universally considered to be one of the most degrading varieties. In fact, the “genre” has even prompted left-wing blacks to criticize it, erroneously blaming white men instead of the real culprit. This type of porn, they argue, follows 3-4 racially charged templates: the white woman always has blonde hair, a white husband watches his wife have intercourse with blacks, multiple blacks “gangbang” one white woman, and the blacks are instructed by Jewish directors to use vulgar anti-white language while they do it.

It should be noted that one pioneer of interracial pornography is Jewish, Nina Hartley. There are times where they blaze the trail, but its usually just an initial step until they can succeed in normalizing perversion. After that, they create a system of incentives to entice gentiles into the field. Think about it, why is Kim Kardashian always in the spotlight? The only thing she has ever done is make a porno with Ray J.

81

Posted by Interracial not for profit on February 17, 2015, 10:56 AM | #

Jews have been identified time and time again as the force behind the promotion of miscegenation, especially the white and negro variety, for decades. Kevin MacDonald’s Culture of Critique implies this is a widespread Jewish compulsion, both conscious and subconscious, to dominate their enemies in spite of lack of physical numbers. By encouraging black and white sexual relations with the formulaic eroticization of ejaculation inside the vagina (creampie), Jews are expecting life to imitate “art” once again, and for us to be bred out. This is in conjunction with them blaring to normal couples that this same exact sexual intercourse isn’t “cool” and men should ejaculate on a woman’s face/ear/eyes/anywhere except their vagina.

This agenda is made even more overt with the porn term “breeding”, which features the same form of copulation. All of the results, without exception, were black men having sex with white women. The names of the videos had titles like “Black Breeds With White Girl”, “Black Makes Baby With White Bitch”, etc. Jews know what they’re doing is sick and wrong, and they revel in it.

Jews Invented The Myth of the Black Sexual Powerhouse To Psychologically Intimidate Men

Jews have created a Freudian society that encourages men to fixate on their genitalia as the be all end all of their masculinity. For this reason, the cherry picking of black porn stars for their extremely large penises is a political act. Virtually every interracial pornography film has the white female verbally reiterating how much bigger and better the black man’s equipment is, in order to make that segment of white men that watch these films to show they aren’t “racist” feel inadequate and demoralized. Furthermore, the black porn stars are always on steroids and very physically fit, and clever camera tricks make it seem like they can screw these women for hours on end without getting tired.

The reality however, is very different. 75% of blacks are overweight or obese, compared to 67% of whites. When it comes to penis size, African countries often come out on top, but their inflated numbers are the product of self-satirizing muhdik self-reporting. When actually measured, there’s some shrinkage. A 2006 Nigerian study found that the average penis size was 5.1 inches, while Tanzanians were on the lower side of the world’s average at 4.5 inches. The average penis size of Italians, on the other hand, was found to be 6.19 inches and the Dutch at 6.24 inches.

This myth seeks to both attack Aryan manhood and create imaginary incentives for women to defy their instincts, and go “coo coo for cocoa puffs”. Record numbers of women are now watching pornography thanks to the anonymity of the internet, they are the real target of Jewish race-mixing porn producers (after black men). And while it still remains uncommon for white women to find black men attractive, Jews have spent generations creating tropes of limp-wristed whites and powerful, manly blacks, which are featured in caricatured forms together in the same scene of their porno films (“Cuckold” porn always features this). Some women are aroused by films of mating bonobos, so who knows?

Monkey See, Monkey Do

As the real facts show, white men aren’t generally watching interracial porn, as the prevailing baseless Talmudic myth purports. Looking through “Adult movie” web forums, whenever the topic comes up, the white males who watch it do so because they like the woman or because they want to show how they’re not racist. You’ll get one or two who say they get off on the humiliation or racial aspect, but they are often exposed as non-white trolls looking to get a kick in, not to mention the sample bias of people who would actually use their free time posting on a website like “Adult DVD Forum”.

The prime consumers of interracial porn are black men. Anyone who lives in an urban environment will find that the people who disproportionately come out of pornshops tend to be black (many of them women), not embarrassed middle aged whites huddling in their trench coats. Eldridge Cleaver, a former member of the Black Panthers, spoke quite candidly about why black men are into degrading or raping white women in his autobiography Soul On Ice (1968):

“Rape was an insurrectionary act. It delighted me that I was defying and trampling upon the white man’s law, upon his system of values, and that I was defiling his women. I felt I was getting revenge. From the site of the act of rape, consternation spread outwardly in concentric circles. I wanted to send waves of consternation throughout the white race.”

Jews have been correctly identified as the leaders of the major Left-wing black insurrectionary movements during the 1960‘s, the perspective from which Cleaver was speaking from and time period when he committed his serial rapes. TMZ tries to shame Alexis Texas for not being “color-blind”, but interracial porn, as Cleaver states, is where the Black politics of resentment and the Jewish politics of White Genocide intersect. This impulse to rape white women as “vengeance” can be even seen in the diary of slave rebellion leader Nat Turner:

“In my fantasies she began to replace the innocent, imaginary girl with the golden curls as the object of my craving, and on those Saturdays when I stole into my private place in the carpenter’s shop to release my pent-up desires, it was Miss Emmeline whose bare white full round hips and belly responded wildly to all my lust and who, sobbing would scream “MERCY, MERCY, MERCY” against my ear, allowed me to partake of the wicked and godless yet unutterable joys of defilement”(pg. 183, Confessions of Nat Turner)

The power of pornography to covertly influence sexual habits has been demonstrated beyond all reasonable doubt . For example, in 1992, only 16% of women had participated in the practice of sodomy (“anal sex”). By 2010, after a titanic Jewish push for “anal sex” pornography enabled by the production cost-cutting power of internet streaming (thus, less popular forms of porn were not as big of a financial risk), 32% of women had been sodomized at some point in their life.

Just imagine the impact interracial porn movies meant to simulate black on white gang rapes, or giving blacks the impression that white women are desperate to sleep with them, have on young black men. Don’t forget the Jewish racial agitation of blacks against whites spoon-fed to them through Sumner Redstone’s BET or Jimmy Iovine’s Interscope Records, which rationalizes even the most random and bestial crimes against white people minding their own business that occur every day in countries like America.

The only real conclusion we can deduce from the portrayal of blacks and whites in Jew porn movies is that they want black men to rape white women. I challenge anyone to look at the grotesque content of the typical interracial porn film and come up with an alternative explanation. There just isn’t one.

Racial Defilement: Not For Jews

You would think that what is essentially a Jewish dominated industry would feature more Jewish themed pornography. Jews mock their racial enemies by making porn featuring women in Hijabs, Bavarian costumes, Nuns, and sexual attacks on every ethnicity and religion you can think of. Jewish themed pornography, interestingly enough, is either quite rare or for all intents and purposes, non-existent. If the “taboo” of race-mixing is what gets these perverts off, why not make one with an Arab impregnating a Jewish woman? There have been one or two Jews who have sporadically tried to make Jewish themed porn, but always get vetoed by their bosses or are unable to find funding for their projects from the Jew-run corporations. This certainly is not due to lack of demand , according to an editorial by the World Union of Jewish Students:

“there are thousands of people searching for Jewish porn. After things like Jewish calendar, Jewish singles, Jewish dating, and Jewish festivals comes ‘Jewish porn’ in the list of top search keywords that GoTo.com provide”

This urgent situation is the real root of universal and perpetual anger towards Jews. The same demented psychology that supports racial Talmudism for Israel (Zionism) and ultra-liberalism for the West (every major Jewish organization shares this characteristic) likewise loves to defile “shiksas” while refusing to sully Jews (unless they’re pretending to be white Gentiles by changing their extremely Yiddish sounding names) themselves in the same fashion. The malicious behavior of Jews is bad enough, but what gets the torches and pitchforks out is their mind-blowing, egregious hypocrisy (chutzpah).

Are they aware of it? I say yes.

Praying for them won’t stop them, only getting the masses out in the street and calling them by name will.