Welcome to the Piano World Piano ForumsOver 2.5 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

I guess my one comment in this listening is that Rachmaninoff has certainly been ill-served in being evaluated on some of his most popular works -- to name names, the C# Minor Prelude, the G Minor Prelude, and Polichinelle. To me, they represent Rachmaninoff at his worst. It is so nice to hear some of the subtle modulations and complex developmental ideas realized in his "Picture Etudes", which to me is Rachmaninoff at his most secretive, and in his best element. Thanks for sharing this!

I would say the C# minor is more vulgar and bombastic in an almost Lisztian sort of way. Still a good piece, but clearly the work of a young headstrong composer with more inspiration than experience or technique. The Op. 39 etudes represent him at the height of his refinement and subtlety as a composer.

I would say the C# minor is more vulgar and bombastic in an almost Lisztian sort of way. Still a good piece, but clearly the work of a young headstrong composer with more inspiration than experience or technique. The Op. 39 etudes represent him at the height of his refinement and subtlety as a composer.

I agree - except for the "vulgar" part.

Unfortunately the C# minor is in the same company as Fur Elise, Fantaisie-Impromptu, Rondo alla Turca, Clair de Lune, and Moonlight 1st movement in that it is played to death (and usually quite ineptly) by beginning/intermediate students who have no business attempting it at all. And I speak from experience having been one of those students who banged through the piece as a youngster.

Beautiful playing of the Opus 39 No. 8. You're raising the bar for all of us here !!!!

I mean vulgar in the best possible sense haha. If by vulgar one means the opposite of subtle and refined I can't think of a better way of describing the C# minor prelude. But that's exactly what I like about it.

I also ineptly banged through the piece as a youngster, as can be seen here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlTizQWDR3M (aged 16, now hidden from my channel hehe). I performed it in the same concert as the Etude and the Chopin Ballade this tuesday, but unfortunately I didn't have the chance to record it. It would have been interesting to compare my old and current performance of it.

Beautiful playing of the Opus 39 No. 8. You're raising the bar for all of us here !!!!

Thank you for saying so. I do hope however that I'm not, as Derelux claims, dissuading other people from posting their performances here.

Well, yes, maybe you are. I guess - for me - the reality is that I'd rather listen to and admire your performances than read critiques of mine!

Regards,

Bruce,

I think that this is the first time (or perhaps one of the VERY few) that I disagree with you completely!

First of all, I should say that it's your performance and eventually there isn't a "right" or "wrong" thing to do! You are free to do whatever you please and nobody should complain!

That said, I'd like to ask you why. I see what you mean and what you wrote, but that's hardly enough in my own mind. Perhaps I'm in a different position than you, but it remains that if one was to compare to what others do, nobody would ever post really (since there are thousands (millions?) of amazing recordings found on the Internet. I mean now it's Debrucey, but if it wasn't for him, it would be someone else, reaching up to Martha.

We can't have that now, can we? Pianoworld is a very civil place (with the rare exceptions), and moreover people know each other quite well somehow. You have a teacher, as far as I know, and you place your trust in him and what he does and shows you. You perform for him. (her?). So why not here?

Anyhow, this is something that while aimed at Bruce applies to lots of other people I think. and it's NOT personal at all. As I said in the beginning it's understandable and makes sense and it's within his rights. But I do think there's room for some discussion here.

______________________________

Debrucey, Sorry for derailing your thread a little bit.

I think that you performance is stellar (and so is the recording, btw. I'm glad that you have access to such wonderful recording facility (and envious as well).

While listening (and typing this) I feel that you have great control over what you do. When watching I feel that you're not moving according to the music (but that's just me and what I'm used in doing and watching).

To others that know this work a little better: Do you feel that some extra rubato and ritenuti would be appropriate? Just wondering here.

Nothing can take from the fact that this is a great recording and a great performance!

wr, the passages you're referring to do make musical sense to me, but not as a "sharp" staccato -- it would be more like a "half-staccato", and is intended to give a "scampering", playful quality to material previously introduced as smooth and lyrical. It's a device I've seen in a number of Rachmaninoff compositions, and I think it adds to the charm.

wr, the passages you're referring to do make musical sense to me, but not as a "sharp" staccato -- it would be more like a "half-staccato", and is intended to give a "scampering", playful quality to material previously introduced as smooth and lyrical. It's a device I've seen in a number of Rachmaninoff compositions, and I think it adds to the charm.

Yes, I understand all that, but somehow it still doesn't work for me. Since it's sort of a blind spot for me, I don't really understand why - that's the nature of blind spots. But I keep hoping that someday it will "click" - even listening to this performance and having a little discussion about it helps, I think. I suspect that I take the entire piece as being heavier in content that it should be, which throws it all out of whack.