I tend to think there’s also extra pressure on Star Trek because it has a reputation for being progressive. For the time it was made it, it often was. But not always. And it’s worth noting that, in Letters to Star Trek (compiled by Susan Sackett), you can find several instances of women fans writing in and objecting to the portrayal of women of TOS. In the ’60s. (Some examples can be found here.) So, saying “it was the 60s” obscures and dismisses that history.

Click through for more. The relevance to the hermeneutics of Biblical interpretation should be obvious. “That was the 60s” is no more of an excuse in the original 60s CE than in the 1960s. And in both cases, recognizing that a work is neither wholly progressive nor wholly antiquated and sexist is challenging.