Chapter II OVERVIEW OF THE MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA

Transcription

1 Overview of the Medical Board of California 5 Chapter II OVERVIEW OF THE MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA A. MBC Generally 2 Created in the Medical Practice Act, the Medical Board of California is a semi-autonomous occupational licensing agency within the state Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA). MBC consists of 21 members who serve four-year terms. By law, twelve of MBC s members must be California-licensed physicians; the remaining nine members are so-called public members (nonphysicians). Nineteen of MBC s members (including all of the physician members and seven of the public members) are appointed by the Governor; the remaining two public members are appointed by the Assembly Speaker and Senate Rules Committee, respectively. MBC is semi-autonomous in that, pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 109(a), its members make final licensing and enforcement decisions (subject to judicial review). Uniquely, MBC is comprised of two autonomous divisions the Division of Licensing (DOL) and the Division of Medical Quality (DMQ). MBC members are not merely appointed to the Board; they are specifically appointed to one of the two divisions. Comprised of seven members (four physicians and three public members), DOL focuses on the licensure of physicians and the regulation of several 3 non-physician health care professions. DMQ, which consists of fourteen members (eight physicians and six public members), is the Board s enforcement arm; it oversees a large enforcement staff and adopts final decisions in disciplinary matters against its licensees. The Legislature rarely directs the Medical Board to do anything; instead, it aims its directives expressly at one of the divisions. Neither division reviews or ratifies the decisions of the other. No other DCA agency is structured this way. 2 Bus. & Prof. Code 2000 et seq. 3 In addition to physicians, DOL licenses registered dispensing optician firms (including contact lens dispensers and spectacle lens dispensers), research psychoanalysts, and licensed midwives; it also regulates unlicensed medical assistants.

2 6 Final Report of the MBC Enforcement Program Monitor The Medical Board is authorized to select an executive director, who serves at its pleasure. 4 In turn, the executive director hires staff to head the Board s licensing and enforcement divisions, and other important management, investigative, analytical, and support staff. In , MBC regulated over 120,000 physicians, of which almost 93,000 reside and practice in California. The Medical Board receives no funding or support from the state s general fund. MBC is funded entirely by physician licensing, renewal, and application fees; as such, it is characterized as a special-fund agency. In , MBC s annual budget was $41 million up from its $38 million budgets during , , and , when a state hiring freeze forced both budget and staffing constrictions on the Board. B. MBC s Enforcement Program As noted above, MBC is responsible not only for licensing physicians, but also for reviewing the quality of medical practice carried out by California physicians; conducting disciplinary proceedings in cases of unprofessional conduct; and generally enforcing the disciplinary and criminal provisions of the Medical Practice Act, other relevant statutes and regulations, and applicable professional 5 standards. MBC accomplishes this latter function through its Division of Medical Quality. MBC s enforcement program is large, complex, and fragmented across three state agencies. DMQ oversees a large enforcement staff that receives, screens, and investigates complaints and reports of physician misconduct and negligence. These staff are based at headquarters in Sacramento and at eleven district offices throughout California. Complaints and reports of physician misconduct are received at the Sacramento-based Central Complaint Unit, where they are screened and if meritorious shipped out to one of the regional district offices for formal investigation. Once a Medical Board investigator (assisted by physician employees called medical consultants and often by external expert physician reviewers) has determined that sufficient evidence exists to take disciplinary action, the matter is transmitted to a separate agency the Health Quality Enforcement Section of the Attorney General s Office; HQE has six offices throughout the state. A deputy attorney general from HQE then files an accusation, a written statement of formal charges, which triggers a panoply of due process rights for the subject physician. Absent settlement, the charges then become the subject of an evidentiary hearing presided over by an administrative law judge (ALJ) from another separate agency the Medical Quality Hearing Panel of the Office of Administrative Hearings at which each side presents its case. After the case is submitted, the ALJ drafts a proposed decision, including findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommended 4 5 Bus. & Prof. Code Id

3 Overview of the Medical Board of California 7 discipline. That proposed decision is referred back to MBC s Division of Medical Quality, where it is reviewed by one of two panels of DMQ, each consisting of seven members (four physicians and three public members). The assigned DMQ panel makes MBC s final disciplinary decision, which is then subject to potentially three levels of review by the courts. Contested MBC disciplinary matters often consume five to eight years, during which time most respondent physicians are free to continue practicing medicine. Business and Professions Code section 2234 sets forth grounds for MBC disciplinary action, including gross negligence (an extreme departure from applicable professional standards); repeated negligent acts; incompetence; the commission of any act of dishonesty or corruption that is substantially related to the qualifications, functions, or duties of a physician; and the violation of any provision of the Medical Practice Act. In MBC disciplinary matters, the burden of proof is on the Board, and MBC must prove its case by clear and convincing evidence to a reasonable certainty. 6 Business and Professions Code section 2227 sets forth an array of sanctions that DMQ may impose on a licensee for a disciplinable violation, including license revocation, suspension, probation on specified terms and conditions, and the issuance of a public reprimand. Through probation, DMQ may restrict a license (for example, it may prohibit a physician from prescribing certain types of controlled substances, practicing without a third-party chaperone, or engaging in solo practice) or condition continued practice on participation in the Board s Diversion Program for substance-abusing licensees; require a physician to take and pass a professional competency exam, psychiatric examination, ethics and/or other continuing education courses, or to undergo psychotherapy or other medical evaluation and treatment; and/or require participation in the Physician Assessment and Clinical Education (PACE) program. Additionally, section 2233 permits DMQ to issue a public letter of reprimand ; section allows Division staff to impose citations and fines on physicians for minor violations of the Medical Practice Act; and other Code sections permit DMQ to assess civil penalties against physicians for specified misconduct. Theoretically, both the ALJ s recommendation and DMQ s imposition of specific disciplinary sanctions are based on disciplinary guidelines formulated by DMQ. These guidelines, which are regularly reviewed and updated by MBC enforcement staff and the Division, are 7 incorporated by reference in DMQ regulation and represent DMQ s preferred range of sanctions for every given violation of the Medical Practice Act and applicable professional standards. They are intended to promote statewide consistency in disciplinary decisionmaking to ensure that similarly situated physician respondents are treated similarly an important component of due process and equal protection. 6 See, e.g., Ettinger v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1982) 135 Cal. App. 3d CAL. CODE REGS

4 8 Final Report of the MBC Enforcement Program Monitor MBC s enforcement program is enormously important to California consumers, who depend on it to rid the marketplace of physicians who are negligent, incompetent, dishonest, or impaired. MBC is the only entity in the state authorized to revoke, suspend, or restrict the license of a California physician in order to protect the public at large, i.e., all consumers of medical services 8 in California. Most California consumers visit a physician regularly, and most physicians see and treat dozens of patients per day. Negligence or misconduct by a physician can easily cause the irreparable harm that justifies the existence of most state licensing programs. Even one moment of negligence or impairment by a physician can result in serious injury to or the death of a patient. Thus, the importance of the effective, efficient, and decisive functioning of MBC s enforcement program cannot be overstated. MBC s enforcement program is also important to physicians who practice medicine in California. Those who become licensed as physicians have spent many years in and many dollars on medical school, clinical education and postgraduate training programs, and often additional training and examinations necessary to become certified by national specialty boards; the law views their license as a property right which may not be taken by the state absent substantive and procedural due process. All segments of society need competent and qualified physicians to assist in preventing, detecting, and treating disease and other medical conditions. Thus, trained physicians should not be barred from the marketplace for insignificant reason. In this era of managed care, the impact of MBC investigative and disciplinary activity can have momentous ramifications for a physician s ability to practice medicine. Thus, the fairness, consistency, and quality of MBC disciplinary decisionmaking are of significant import to California s physician population. These sometimes competing priorities of consumer protection and physician marketplace access have been reflected in the Legislature s evolving definition of the paramount goal of MBC s enforcement program. Prior to 1990, Business and Professions Code section 2229 directed MBC, in exercising its disciplinary authority, to take such action as is calculated to aid in the rehabilitation of the licensee for example, by ordering additional education or restricting (rather than revoking) the license. In 1990, however, the Legislature amended section 2229 to unambiguously declare that [p]rotection of the public shall be the highest priority for the Division of Medical Quality Physician rehabilitation is still recognized as a goal for DMQ in exercising its disciplinary authority; however, [w]here rehabilitation and protection are inconsistent, protection shall be paramount Arnett v. Dal Cielo (1996) 14 Cal. 4th 4, 10. Bus. & Prof. Code 2229(a), added by 1990 Cal. Stat Bus. & Prof. Code 2229(c). This declaration of legislative intent was later replicated for MBC generally in AB 269 (Correa) (Chapter 107, Statutes of 2002), which added section to the Business and Professions Code. Section declares that [p]rotection of the public shall be the highest priority of the Medical Board of California in exercising its licensing, regulatory, and disciplinary functions. Whenever the protection of the public is inconsistent

5 Overview of the Medical Board of California 9 Enforcement is expensive. Consistent with prior years dating back to the early 1990s, MBC spent 75% of its $41 million budget over $30 million on enforcement in fiscal year C. MBC s Diversion Program The Medical Board s Diversion Program was created in 1980 legislation that enacted Business and Professions Code section 2340 et seq. In the enabling legislation, the Legislature stated its intent that the Medical Board of California seek ways and means to identify and rehabilitate physicians and surgeons with impairment due to abuse of dangerous drugs or alcohol, or due to mental illness or physical illness, affecting competency so that physicians and surgeons so afflicted may be treated and returned to the practice of medicine in a manner which will not endanger the 11 public health and safety. Consistent with MBC s chief priority of public protection, this language thus requires the Board to identify and rehabilitate impaired physicians and return them to the practice of medicine, but only if this can be done in a manner which will not endanger the public health and safety. Although the enabling language makes reference to physicians with mental or physical illness, the Diversion Program has historically been structured to monitor substance-abusing physicians. Participants in the Diversion Program include physicians who voluntarily seek help ( self-referrals ), physicians who are referred by the Board s enforcement program during investigation of a complaint ( Board-referred ), and physicians who are ordered to participate by DMQ as a term of probation in a formal disciplinary order ( Board-ordered ). Regardless of method of entry, each participant is required to enter into a contract with the Program. In the contract, the participant agrees to abstain from the use of drugs and alcohol, submit to random bodily fluids testing, attend support group meetings with similarly impaired physicians, undergo psychotherapy and/or substance abuse treatment, retain a worksite monitor, and cease practicing medicine if so instructed by the Program due to relapse or other noncompliance with the terms of the contract. The Division of Medical Quality is statutorily responsible for overseeing the Diversion Program, which is administered by a staff of twelve MBC employees. Although several of the 12 Program s components (including bodily fluids collection, laboratory testing, and facilitation of support group meetings) have been contracted to the private sector, the case management function of the program and overall Program administration have been housed within the Medical Board since the Program s inception in The overhead costs of the Program almost $1.2 million in with other interests sought to be promoted, the protection of the public shall be paramount. 11 Bus. & Prof. Code Id

6 10 Final Report of the MBC Enforcement Program Monitor are subsidized entirely through licensing fees paid by all California physicians. As of June 30, 2005, 232 physicians were admitted to and participating in the Diversion Program.

New York State Office of the State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli Division of State Government Accountability Oversight of Nurse Licensing State Education Department Report 2016-S-83 September 2017 Executive

Regulatory Council for Community Association Managers Telephone Conference Meeting Wednesday, December 6, 2007 @ 9:00 A.M. EST. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 9:10 a.m. by Mr. Millard

1 MANDATORY DRUG TESTING OF MERCHANT MARINE PERSONNEL By Walter J. Brudzinski INTRODUCTION The U.S. Coast Guard is charged with, among other things, promulgating and enforcing regulations for the promotion

BEFORE THE MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Second Amended ) Accusation and Petition to Revoke Probation ) Against: ) LIEN JAY KYRI, M.D.

Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1998 PM:249:7651 In This Chapter SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OVERVIEW The Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1998 was enacted as part of the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental

KANSAS STATUTES ANNOTATED Article 35 LICENSURE OF ADULT CARE HOME ADMINISTRATORS 65-3501. As used in this act, or the act of which this section is amendatory, the following words and phrases shall have

This initiative measure is submitted to the people in accordance with the provisions of Article II, Section 8, of the California Constitution. This initiative measure amends and adds sections to the Health

Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 344 Nursing Home Administrators August 28, 2010 Definitions. 344.010. As used in this chapter the following words or phrases mean: (1) "Board", the Missouri board of nursing

The Law And Rules Regulating the Practice Of Opticianry and Ocularistry in Ohio This course has been approved by the Ohio Optical Dispensers Board for one (1) continuing education credit. The credit you

Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law. 0 State of Arkansas st General Assembly As Engrossed: H// A Bill Regular Session, HOUSE BILL By: Representative

Statutes and Regulations Nursing Home Administrators December 2010 (Centralized Statutes and Regulations not included) DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS,

CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CHILDREN S ADVOCACY INSTITUTE University of San Diego School of Law 5998 Alcalá Park San Diego, CA 92110-2492 P: (619) 260-4806 / F: (619) 260-4753 1107 Ninth Street, Suite

1 MANDATORY DRUG TESTING OF MERCHANT MARINE PERSONNEL By Walter J. Brudzinski 1 INTRODUCTION The U.S. Coast Guard is charged with, among other things, promulgating and enforcing regulations for the promotion

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2017 Regular Session Enrolled Senate Bill 58 Printed pursuant to Senate Interim Rule 213.28 by order of the President of the Senate in conformance with presession filing

Practitioner Credentialing Criteria for Participation and Termination I. Statement of Purpose Regence (referred to hereinafter as the Company ) is firmly committed to the development of networks with practitioners

Amendments to MCLE Regulations Effective February 23, 2018 Regulation 5.200(g) Service as a Bar Examiner. Three (3) credits may be claimed for writing a bar exam or local component question and three (3)

Article 30. Practice of Acupuncture. 90-450. Purpose. It is the purpose of this Article to promote the health, safety, and welfare of the people of North Carolina by establishing an orderly system of acupuncture

Types of Authorized Recipients Probation/Parole Officers or the Department of Corrections Research current through May 2016. This project was supported by Grant No. G1599ONDCP03A, awarded by the Office

BBS Policy and Advocacy Committee Minutes May 12, 2017 Written by Jill Epstein 1. Election of Officers A Chair and a Vice Chair must be elected prior to June 1 of each year. The Board elected Deborah Brown

Joseph J. Bova, RPh This program has been brought to you by PharmCon PharmCon is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education as a provider of continuing pharmacy education Speaker: Joseph

I. Professionalism Guidelines for Professionalism, Licensure, and Personal Conduct The American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Version 2017-5 Adopted Effective 1/29/2017 Professionalism is the basis of

Page 1 of 18 POSITION STATEMENT The School of Pharmacy and Health Professions: - desires to protect the public from students who are chemically impaired. - recognizes that chemical impairment (including

KANSAS STATE BOARD OF NURSING ARTICLES Insofar as these articles conflict with or limit any federal or state statute or regulation, the statute or regulation controls. These articles are not intended to

Please return the completed application to CRNNS at the address noted above with proof of legal name (if it has changed since last licensed with CRNNS). A. Personal Information Show given names in full.

Professional Licensure and Disciplinary Issues Presented by Natalie Hall, R.N., Member, Indiana State Board of Nursing Elizabeth Kiefner Crawford, J.D., Director, Indiana State Board of Nursing What is

c t REGISTERED NURSES ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 15, 2016. It is intended for information and

00 STATE OF WYOMING 0LSO-0 HOUSE BILL NO. HB0 Cosmetology act. Sponsored by: Representative(s) Esquibel, Alden and Tipton and Senator(s) Job and Mockler A BILL for AN ACT relating to the Wyoming Cosmetology

th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--0 Regular Session A-Engrossed House Bill Ordered by the House April Including House Amendments dated April Sponsored by Representatives MCKEOWN, KENY-GUYER, Senators KRUSE,

Case 3:14-cv-00525-JWD-RLB Document 1 08/22/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES LLC d/b/a HOPE MEDICAL GROUP FOR WOMEN, on behalf

Bylaws of the College of Registered Nurses of British Columbia 1.0 In these bylaws: BYLAWS OF THE COLLEGE OF REGISTERED NURSES OF BRITISH COLUMBIA [includes amendments up to December 17, 2011; amendments