I don't buy many. One of the nice perqs of my job is easy access to a fine university library. And through it, access to two other fine libraries at Duke and UNC-CH.

The last book I bought was an impulse buy while waiting for my family in a mall: Eats, Shoots & Leaves. (There's hope for the country when a book about punctuation makes the best-seller list.)

Before that, I bought Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern Worldandenjoyed it. The multi-culti types do have something of a point: I took my share of history in school, including "world" history, but missed out almost entirely on non-Western history. Ol' Genghis was an interesting guy.

The heart of the game. Interesting question, of course, but I'm a bit reluctant to answer. My concern is similar to the Academy Award winners who worry aloud about forgetting to thank someone. I might well be omitting something due to failing memory, not lack of significance. And I see no need to restrict the question just to "books". Or to just five entries.

That said, here are five books and two articles that have meant a lot to me:

1. Ernest Hemingway, The Old Man and the Sea. Read it in ninth grade and it absolutely ruined for me all subsequent English classes. Fooey on English and Early American authors! I don't care what feminists and the MLA think, here was a man, and this is how to write.

2. Paul A. Samuelson, Economics, Ninth Edition (the first edition with color!). I went to college without any idea what I was going to major in. First semester I took economics and drew a young teacher, just a year or two out of grad school, who was one of the least effective teachers I've ever had. But at least he had the good sense to assign Samuelson. Almost every chapter thrilled me and I found my major.

3. Thomas Sowell, A Conflict of Visions. The best work of synthesis I have ever read. Phenomenally insightful. If you want to understand politics in the U.S. over the last 40 years and probably for many years to come, you should read this book.

4. F. A. Hayek, "The Use of Knowledge in Society," American Economic Review, September 1945. To me, the central question in applied economics is how much allocation should be by government and how much by markets. In a few simple pages Hayek provides an impressive analysis, an analysis that with experience just looks better and better.

5. Harold Demsetz, "Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy," Journal of Law and Economics, April 1973. Can any issue in applied economics be settled? Isn't it true that for every study in economics that says "X" there will be an equal and opposite study that says "not X"? No. By the early seventies there were about 100 studies that claimed high profits in concentrated industries were evidence of non-competitive behavior. (This was described by one scholar as one of the most strongly verified propositions in all of economics.) In this tour de force, Demsetz begged to differ. And he won.

6. Steven Landsburg, Price Theory and Applications(any edition, 1 through 6). Has made my teaching career easier and more fun. The best book I know of for teaching intermediate micro. The best book I know of for teaching economics to MBAs. The best book I know of for teaching principles of economics to honors students. (Given the slightest excuse, I'll use it.) One of the very first exercises at the end of the first chapter is, "True of false: the invention of a form of birth control that is cheaper, more effective, and easier to use will surely result in fewer unwanted pregnancies."

If you don't think you can get the attention of 19-year-olds with that question, guess again.

7. Berke Breathed, Bloom County Babylon (and all the earlier books in the series). When I was a kid, I loved Peanuts. Later, for a while, I admired and loved Doonesbury. Today, Beavis & Butthead and South Park often give me a laugh. But the absolute king, the finest, most consistent comic I know of, is Berke Breathed. I don't hesitate to call his Bloom County strips genius. And I sure miss Opus.

I don't buy many. One of the nice perqs of my job is easy access to a fine university library. And through it, access to two other fine libraries at Duke and UNC-CH.

The last book I bought was an impulse buy while waiting for my family in a mall: Eats, Shoots & Leaves. (There's hope for the country when a book about punctuation makes the best-seller list.)

Before that, I bought Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern Worldandenjoyed it. The multi-culti types do have something of a point: I took my share of history in school, including "world" history, but missed out almost entirely on non-Western history. Ol' Genghis was an interesting guy.

The heart of the game. Interesting question, of course, but I'm a bit reluctant to answer. My concern is similar to the Academy Award winners who worry aloud about forgetting to thank someone. I might well be omitting something due to failing memory, not lack of significance. And I see no need to restrict the question just to "books". Or to just five entries.

That said, here are five books and two articles that have meant a lot to me:

1. Ernest Hemingway, The Old Man and the Sea. Read it in ninth grade and it absolutely ruined for me all subsequent English classes. Fooey on English and Early American authors! I don't care what feminists and the MLA think, here was a man, and this is how to write.

2. Paul A. Samuelson, Economics, Ninth Edition (the first edition with color!). I went to college without any idea what I was going to major in. First semester I took economics and drew a young teacher, just a year or two out of grad school, who was one of the least effective teachers I've ever had. But at least he had the good sense to assign Samuelson. Almost every chapter thrilled me and I found my major.

3. Thomas Sowell, A Conflict of Visions. The best work of synthesis I have ever read. Phenomenally insightful. If you want to understand politics in the U.S. over the last 40 years and probably for many years to come, you should read this book.

4. F. A. Hayek, "The Use of Knowledge in Society," American Economic Review, September 1945. To me, the central question in applied economics is how much allocation should be by government and how much by markets. In a few simple pages Hayek provides an impressive analysis, an analysis that with experience just looks better and better.

5. Harold Demsetz, "Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy," Journal of Law and Economics, April 1973. Can any issue in applied economics be settled? Isn't it true that for every study in economics that says "X" there will be an equal and opposite study that says "not X"? No. By the early seventies there were about 100 studies that claimed high profits in concentrated industries were evidence of non-competitive behavior. (This was described by one scholar as one of the most strongly verified propositions in all of economics.) In this tour de force, Demsetz begged to differ. And he won.

6. Steven Landsburg, Price Theory and Applications(any edition, 1 through 6). Has made my teaching career easier and more fun. The best book I know of for teaching intermediate micro. The best book I know of for teaching economics to MBAs. The best book I know of for teaching principles of economics to honors students. (Given the slightest excuse, I'll use it.) One of the very first exercises at the end of the first chapter is, "True of false: the invention of a form of birth control that is cheaper, more effective, and easier to use will surely result in fewer unwanted pregnancies."

If you don't think you can get the attention of 19-year-olds with that question, guess again.

7. Berke Breathed, Bloom County Babylon (and all the earlier books in the series). When I was a kid, I loved Peanuts. Later, for a while, I admired and loved Doonesbury. Today, Beavis & Butthead and South Park often give me a laugh. But the absolute king, the finest, most consistent comic I know of, is Berke Breathed. I don't hesitate to call his Bloom County strips genius. And I sure miss Opus.