This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the FAQ and RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate and remove the ads - it's free!

Re: Tom DeLay money laundering verdict overturned

Originally Posted by PeteEU

Good to have friends in high places and enough money to buy them off..

You have sources to share of course.

"He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
"Fly-over" country voted, and The Donald is now POTUS.

Re: Tom DeLay money laundering verdict overturned

Originally Posted by Grant

Actually no one calls them Reaganophones. You should stop and think before you edit someone else's post.

How is that relevant? The program people attribute to Obama is actually attributable to Reagan. Just because ignorant Democrat voters and dishonest Republican hacks call it Obamaphones doesn't make it so.

You should stop and think before you comment to another poster who has demonstrated vastly superior knowledge of virtually every topic compared to you.

Re: Tom DeLay money laundering verdict overturned

Originally Posted by obvious Child

How is that relevant? The program people attribute to Obama is actually attributable to Reagan. Just because ignorant Democrat voters and dishonest Republican hacks call it Obamaphones doesn't make it so.

If people call it an Obamaphone that is what it is. And are there any Democrat voters who aren't ignorant?

You should stop and think before you comment to another poster who has demonstrated vastly superior knowledge of virtually every topic compared to you.

Re: Tom DeLay money laundering verdict overturned

Originally Posted by Grant

If people call it an Obamaphone that is what it is. And are there any Democrat voters who aren't ignorant?

If I call a pig a panda, does that make a pig a panda? What kind of asinine logic is that? That things are whatever people call them? By your argument, a toliteraian state run by a dictator who calls the nation a "free democratic society" is thereby a Free Democratic Society merely because he said so.

That's idiotic. Even for this place. But that's exactly what you are arguing.

That has yet to be demonstrated.

On the contrary, you run away from my rebuttals constantly. Remember that Clinton non-profit thread? Massively superior knowledge compared to you.

Re: Tom DeLay money laundering verdict overturned

Originally Posted by obvious Child

If I call a pig a panda, does that make a pig a panda? What kind of asinine logic is that? That things are whatever people call them? By your argument, a toliteraian state run by a dictator who calls the nation a "free democratic society" is thereby a Free Democratic Society merely because he said so.

If you were calling a pig a panda you would be the only one doing so. But everyone calls an Obamaphone an Obamaphone. You might have your own terms for different animals and objects but it's clear that no one else agrees with you. I even provided the links. But if people are calling Obamaphones Reaganophones, please provide the links. Most people wouldn'y have any idea what uyou are talking about.

That's idiotic. Even for this place. But that's exactly what you are arguing.
On the contrary, you run away from my rebuttals constantly. Remember that Clinton non-profit thread? Massively superior knowledge compared to you.

Can't recall anything about a Clinton non-profit thread. Have you doctored my posts there as well?