Featured Post

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Exploding a Myth: Many Newspapers DID Oppose Iraq War 11 Years Ago

The 11th anniversary of the start of the Iraq War arrives this week
but coverage in the mainstream media has been sparse so far. What we will likely again hear from commentators, when they get around
to it, this year is that George W. Bush may have made the wrong call but
he went to war with the overwhelming support of the public and the
press.

Actually, this is a myth.

It’s true that polls showed that Americans believed Saddam had
WMD—and no wonder, given the deceitful propaganda from the Bush
administration—and that they backed an invasion at some point if it came to that.
But most surveys also showed about a 50/50 split between those who
wanted to go to war soon, and those who wanted to wait for more
diplomacy or to give the United Nations inspectors more time to work.
(Remember, they had found nothing and then were withdrawn by the
president).

Another myth: The nation’s newspapers on their editorial pages backed the invasion strongly.

You may be surprised to learn that in their final pre-attack
editorials, at least one-third of the top newspapers in this country
came out against President Bush’s taking us to war at that time. Most of
the papers may have badly fumbled the WMD coverage, and only timidly raised
questions about the need for war—see my newly updated book on media malpractice before and during the war, So Wrong for So Long—but when push came to shove eleven years ago many wanted to wait longer to move against Saddam, or not move at all.

“For apparently the first time in modern history, the US government
seems poised to go to war not only lacking the support of many of its
key allies abroad but also without the enthusiastic backing of the
majority of major newspapers at home,” Ari Berman, now at The Nation, and I wrote at Editor & Publisher on March 19, 2003. Berman had just completed his fifth and final prewar survey of the top fifty newspapers’ editorial positions.

I had certainly been critical of overall press coverage of the
war—and the editorial writers and pundits largely backed the adventure
for years—but at least there was some sense of protest on the eve of the
invasion.

Following Bush’s forty-eight-hour ultimatum to Saddam Hussein on
March 17, newspapers took their last opportunity to sound off before the
war started. Of the forty-four papers publishing editorials about the
war, roughly one-third reiterated strong support for the White House,
one-third repeated their abiding opposition to it and the rest—with
further debate now useless—took a more philosophical approach.

But in the end, the majority agreed that the Bush administration had
badly mishandled the crisis. Most papers sharply criticized Washington’s
diplomatic efforts—putting the nation on the eve of a pre-emptive war
without UN Security Council support—and expressed fears for the future
despite an inevitable victory.

Once-equivocal editorial pages got straight to the point. “This war crowns a period of terrible diplomatic failure,” The New York Times
argued, “Washington’s worst in at least a generation. The Bush
administration now presides over unprecedented American might. What it
risks squandering is not Americans’ power, but an essential part of our
glory.”

Other papers were even more blunt. The Baltimore Sun,
consistently one of the most passionate dissenters on the war, began
their editorial, “This war is wrong. It is wrong as a matter of
principle, but, more importantly, it is wrong as a matter of practical
policy.” USA Today asked Bush to finally disclose risks, costs and democratic government estimates for Iraq, while the St. Louis Post-Dispatch wondered “what ‘the peaceful entry’ of 280,000 troops would look like.” The Arizona Republic
in Phoenix said that Bush and his “coalition of the willing,” with
prodding by the French, “have left the United Nations in tatters.”

The Houston Chronicle said it remained “unconvinced” that attack was preferable to containment, and the Orange County Register
of Santa Ana, California, declared it was “unpersuaded” that the threat
posed by the “vile” Hussein justified military action now. The San Jose
(California) Mercury News wrote, “War might have been avoided, had the administration been sincere about averting it.”
Even a hawkish paper expressed criticism. “The war will be conducted with less support than the cause should have commanded,” The Washington Post,
in backing the attack, wrote. “The Bush administration has raised the
risks through its insistence on an accelerated timetable, its
exaggerated rhetoric and its insensitive diplomacy; it has alienated
allies and multiplied the number of protestors in foreign capitals.”

There was always in the run-up a group of roughly a dozen papers that
strongly supported regime change as the only acceptable vehicle toward
Iraq’s disarmament. They included The Wall Street Journal, the New York Post, the New York Daily News, the Chicago Sun-Times and the Boston Herald.
They continued their praise of the president this week and celebrated
the fact that “the regime of Saddam Hussein is doomed,” as The Kansas City (Missouri) Star put it.

The majority of papers, however, remained deeply troubled by the
position the United States found itself in. Even large papers such as
the Los Angeles Times, The Oregonian in Portland, and Newsday of
Melville, New York, which have long advocated (or at least accepted)
using force to disarm Hussein, criticized their president as he prepared
to send young men and women into battle.

“The road to imminent war has been a bumpy one, clumsily traveled by the Bush administration,” The Buffalo News wrote. (Margaret Sullivan, now public editor at The New York Times,
was editor then.) “The global coalition against terror forged after the
atrocities of 9/11 is virtually shattered. The explanation as to why
Iraq presents an imminent threat requiring immediate action has not been
clear and compelling.”An updated and expanded edition of Greg Mitchell’s So Wrong for So Long, with a preface by Bruce Springsteen.

is author of a dozen books (click on covers at right), including the new "THE TUNNELS: Escapes Under the Berlin Wall and the Historic Films the JFK White House Tried to Kill." He was the longtime editor of Editor & Publisher. Email: epic1934@aol.com. Twitter: @GregMitch

No comments:

ORDER MY NEW BOOK

Just published in October by Crown. Click on cover (above) to order at nice discount. It's a thrilling history of escape tunnels--under the Berlin Wall--and JFK's attempt to suppress NBC and CBS films about them at the height of the Cold War.. Hailed by The New York Times Book Review, Bill Moyers, and Frederick Forsyth, among others, and feaured by NPR"s Scott Simon. Paul Greengrass attached to direct movie. "A fascinating and complex picture of the interplay between politics and media in the Cold War era.” -- Washington Post. "A gripping, blow-by-blow account."--Publishers Weekly (starred review).

"Atomic Cover-up": Shocking suppression of U.S. film

How U.S. buried for decades the key footage from Hiroshima shot by the U.S. military. Click on cover above for my popular book and e-book.

Hollywood and The Bomb

My book on MGM's 1947 epic on Hiroshima and creating the first bomb--and the White House censorship that wrecked it. E-book just $2.99.

My Book on the Bomb with Robert Jay Lifton

Acclaimed book on nuclear culture, and political and psychological fallout in the USA. Written with Robert Jay Lifton. Click on cover to read more or order.

Award-Winning 'Campaign of the Century''

"Upton Sinclair's Race for Governor of California--and the Birth of Media Politics": Amazingly influential and wild 1934 race with great relevance for today.

New Edition of my book on Bush, and Media, Failures on Iraq

Preface by Bruce Springsteen. "Read this book--twice." -- Bill Moyers

New Edition of Our Beethoven Book!

G.M.'s book w/ Kerry Candaele, a tie-in to our new acclaimed film. E-book and print.

New Edition of my "Tricky Dick and The Pink Lady"

The notorious Nixon-Douglas race in 1950, a New York Times Notable Book, now in new print and e-book versions.

"Vonnegut and Me" E-book

Conversations and close encounters with the novelist. Click cover for more. $2.99.

How the President and the Military Censored MGM's Anti-Nuke Epic!

The truly wild and important story on the unmaking of 'Most Important Movie Ever Made.' Just $3.29. Click cover to order.

My Latest Book: On Hollywood Politics!

Why and when did the movie biz turn "liberal"? The full and fun story, and the left-wing election campaign that sparked it. Click on cover for more. $3.99.

Unique E-Book on the Obama-Romney Race

Probes campaign 2012 and the aftermath--plus 500 clickable links to key stories and videos! Just $2.99. Click on image above to read more or order.

Search This Blog!

New Edition of U.S. vs. Pvt. Manning Book

Updated: The saga of the whistleblowing soldier, written with Kevin Gosztola. Hailed by Glenn Greenwald, Daniel Ellsberg. Click cover for more.

About Me

is author of a dozen books (click on covers at right), including the new "THE TUNNELS: Escapes Under the Berlin Wall and the Historic Films the JFK White House Tried to Kill." He was the longtime editor of Editor & Publisher. Email: epic1934@aol.com. Twitter: @GregMitch