We got an F, as did seven other states. With our 50% score, we did worse than everybody else but Georgia (49%). What gives?

Many of the states at the bottom of the rankings, meanwhile, are sparsely-populated Western or Plains states like Idaho (40th), Wyoming (48th) and the Dakotas (North Dakota is number 43 and South Dakota comes in at 49). There, libertarianism roots, a small-town, neighborly approach to government and the honest belief that 'everybody knows everybody" has overridden any perceived need for strong protections in law.

Peggy Kerns, director of the Center for Ethics in Government at the National Conference of State Legislatures, noted that ethics laws are shaped by the environment and culture of the state. "In smaller states, the culture is different," she said. "It is harder to disobey the law and go against your own moral core if everyone knows you" [Caitlyn Ginley, "Grading the Nation: How Accountable Is Your State?" Center for Public Integrity, 2012.03.19].

Ah, so it's not that we've got lots of corruption; it's that we're so confident that we don't have corruption that we haven't our faith-based henhouse leaves the door open for serious foxes. States that have dealt with more foxes have better chicken wire: New Jersey gets the highest score, a B+ at 87%, while Illinois, often reviled for "Chicago-style politics," ranks tenth with a C at 74%.

The Center for Public Integrity engaged local reporters in each state to gather data on their state governments. South Dakota's observer was blogger emerita Denise Ross. Here's how her data broke down by category:

In her write-up of our scores, Ross notes Democrat frustration with Republican domination of the redistricting process, but she gives the state good marks for increasing transparency in that process. We also get a B for internal auditing. On everything else on the scorecard, we stink. Some of the major stinkers:

Ross includes comment on the ethics commission from the Governor's chief of staff Dusty Johnson, who says our current policies and our "free and robust press" sufficiently check corruption. Ross also notes that Secretary Gant is making some improvements with online campaign finance information.

Still, that F doesn't look good. Even if we all trust each other, we need strong ethics laws and crystal-clear government transparency to protect our public dollars and institutions from inevitable abuses.

Cory, a lack of transparency and accountability may correlate positively with the actual existence of corruption. I suspect that it does -- strongly, too. But you insinuate that the two things are identical. They are not.

Besides that theoretical nit, look at the practical aspect: If a government is opaque as the night is dark, how are we to know for certain how much corruption exists? We cannot obtain the very data that we need. It's the uncertainty principle on steroids.

Although I highly doubt that very many secretive governments are honest as the nanometer is short, it's theoretically possible.

On the other hand, I doubt that a government would last very long these days if it were transparent yet corrupt.

Little slips of logic like this might amount to nothing one by one, but a series of them, cleverly strung together, could lead from soundness to absurdity, from truth to a lie.

Interestingly, not a single state that I could see got an A in this rating system. Like, we should all be surprised at that result, right?

We would do well to demand greater transparency and accountability from our government officials, you know, the ones that we elect to serve us. In practice you are right, I think, if you would conclude that such a change would lead to less corruption.

Transparency means that you can sustain corruption only by extremely sneaky behavior or through force. Stan, you are right on the logical point. This report card is right in saying that transparency decreases the potential for corruption.

If you accept that reasoning, then, Mom, I'd say local governments may fail the report card even more, since they seem to do worse at publishing their information and because the local press is less robust.

Baloney, Grudz! My classroom is totally transparent. Come on up, watch me teach. I can show you everything I do but the student grades, which are protected by federal law. If there's any lack of transparency, talk to your school board.

I know first hand the corruption that exists in western South Dakota. The good ol' boy system allows corruption in all of it's social institutions. I am at the mercy of unethical, immature small town networking. Such evil here...

Dakota Rural Action » BlogUpdate on teacher pay: by Bill Powers Lieutenant Governor Matt Michels recently (as of Monday, March 1) indicated that in consultation with the legislature’s leadership there is general concern over increasing property taxe…

A Progressive on the PrairieBest of February 2015: Books Hubert Wolf’s The Nuns of Sant’Ambrogio: The True Story of a Convent in Scandal epitomizes how history should be written for the general public. Although the PR around the book promises a look a…

2015.03.02

Dakota Today***This and that internet stuff: AT&T has invented a new ripoff scam. Get high speed internet service, but the price is a LOT higher if users opt to retain their privacy. AT&T Charges for privacy And our SD US Senator John Th…

2015.03.01

Lakota VoiceEditor’s Letter to the Oyate: Sunday, March 1, 2015 by Ann-erika White Bird A letter to the Oyate: I want to thank everyone who sent messages of support these past couple weeks, by e-mail, text or fb message. I appreciate the wome…

2015.03.01

South DaColaBlue State Ball, 2015: I had the pleasure of attending the Ball for the 2nd time this year – Friday night. Besides meeting a fantastic group of bleeding heart liberals (I don’t like the word ‘progressive’ sounds like an exe…