This is the main board on The Outhouse, where Outhousers talk about everything. No topics are off limits, and it doesn't have to be about comics. All the topics from the other boards also show up in The Asylum, so you never have to leave1

ReturnoftheMack wrote:I cut your response from where my argument begins. I think you can get blame people for making mistakes this costly. His punishment is he has to live with what he's done. Thats enough for me.

That we all have to live with the consequences of our actions is something we can both agree upon.

If Zimmerman actually acted in the manner he and the jury say he did, I would like to have a few more Zimmerman's in my neighborhood.

- Continuity is or it is not. There is no such thing as soft continuity.- A character IS his continuity.- Continuity is consistency of the characteristics of people, plot, objects, and places seen by the reader or viewer.

dairydead wrote:This is big talk for someone who has disregarded literally every testimony and piece of evidence in lieu of a single medical officer's " Nothing that couldn't be covered with some bandages" quote.

ReturnoftheMack wrote:Why do you guys keep saying I want to demonize Zimmerman? If I did, I would be calling for his head and saying he's guilty of murder. I don't know why I have to repeat myself: the man is not guilty of murdering Trayvon.

But what he did was make a bad decision based off a flawed assumption. I don't get why this is so controversial.

Because people are incapable of recognizing that this issue can be viewed from more than two extreme, polar perspectives, so if you don't think Zimmerman was a racist murderer then you are a racist yourself, and if you don't think that Martin was a bloodthirsty, drug-crazed Thug who needed Zimmerman, a hero, to take him down for the good of society, then you are a guilty white race baiter.

S.F. Jude Terror wrote:Because people are incapable of recognizing that this issue can be viewed from more than two extreme, polar perspectives, so if you don't think Zimmerman was a racist murderer then you are a racist yourself, and if you don't think that Martin was a bloodthirsty, drug-crazed Thug who needed Zimmerman, a hero, to take him down for the good of society, then you are a guilty white race baiter.

All i know is that i couldn't bring myself to watch the trial, especially with how the media was treating it. Also, i was working during most of the trial so i didn't really have a chance. But if you sat down and watched hours of people you consider to be "lying" pick apart your side, wouldn't that just make you angry? I guess i don't understand the motivation, especially if you had your mind made up already based on nothing but a hunch.

All i know is that i couldn't bring myself to watch the trial, especially with how the media was treating it. Also, i was working during most of the trial so i didn't really have a chance. But if you sat down and watched hours of people you consider to be "lying" pick apart your side, wouldn't that just make you angry? I guess i don't understand the motivation, especially if you had your mind made up already based on nothing but a hunch.

achilles wrote: considering he'd done burglary before. Just as he'd attacked people before. Nor did Zimmerman suggest that. I did. All Zimmerman said was that Martin was acting suspicious, like he was on drugs, (the latter was certainly true---in addition to the weed in his system, he was an admitted lean addict).