Friday, May 19, 2017

I have no doubt that someone will manage it eventually, but it's going to be hard to top this virtue-signaling lunacy. And Sweet Saint Darwin, but is physignomy real or what? You could not design a more flawless case of cuck-face if you held a competition of award-winning portrait artists.

Even though the year is 2017, racism and prejudice continue to pollute our world. Many people retain narrow-minded and over-simplistic views on what a family should "look like".

Aaron and Rachel Halbert have experienced such prejudices up close - despite that they deserve loads of love and respect for several courageous decisions they took.

The Halberts first adopted two children - and then chose to take things a step further - after learning about embryo adoption.

The parents were determined to offer a home to more children who would otherwise not have a family - and decided not to forget those frozen embryos who seem to be forgotten.

Love and respect? They don't deserve love and respect for hating their own people and helping to destroy their community, their society, and their nation. There is a reason that people instinctively feel contempt and disgust for their literally anti-social actions; condemn it if you like, but it exists for a very good reason. And it's not a coincidence that the husband has cuckface and the woman has seriously crazy eyes. Their decisions weren't courageous, they were crazy.

These are without doubt the Crazy Years. They will be followed by the Rivers of Blood Years. There is nothing new under the sun, and humanity violates history's time-hallowed patterns at its peril.

I'd say not crazy eyes, but she has evil eyes. In these pictures she is smiling, but I can easily imagine that when the camera is off, or if it is a mug shot camera, the demon lurking inside of her would show more clearly.

She reminds me of the woman who mudsharked and tortured her step son to death in the news recently. Looks like Tilda Swindon as the witch in Narnia.

Man Alive, I'm getting sick and tired of hearing these virtue signalling stories. It reminds me of constantly hearing / reading / watching articles / news reports about Apartheid when I was much younger. Eventually I was fatigued and I just didn't give a crap about it.

> They will be followed by the Rivers of Blood Years. There is nothing new under the sun, and humanity violates history's time-hallowed patterns at its peril.They will be followed by the Rivers of Blood Years. There is nothing new under the sun, and humanity violates history's time-hallowed patterns at its peril.

"And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world beginsWhen all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins,As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn,The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!"

They deliberately matched the frozen embryo kids they purchased with their existing fake kids on the basis of race. Racists!

They feel comfortable recognizing that the kids might want their fake siblings to be of the same race, yet they won't allow themselves to pick fake kids of their own race. And the members of t h sir community who recognize the racial mess of their "family" are bad racists, but their fake kids are theoretically the good kind of racists for wanting to be black together.

They hold whites to a higher standard, race blindness being higher in their minds. Why? Because whites are superior at putting race aside? It's the white parent's burden to show the lesser races the way?

Not gonna look up how long-ago this was technically feasible, but how many years would you have to go back before this woman would have been put in a nuthouse if she went to her doctor and said that this was her plan? 40? 50? 60?

Are there no more starving children in Africa that they now actually have to make more from frozen embryos?

"And no one will call them racist now. Good one, you nailed the Left with your selective breeding."

It is, essentially, a Getting-Called-Racist Insurance scam.Avoid getting called racist for the low, low price of:1) Commit ritual acts of suicide,2) Attack everybody who doesn't purchase the same insurance plan,3) Shut up and apologize when we call you racist anyway.

So they acknowledge that similar skin color is important for the older 2siblings to bond w the next, yet these two morons don't see how that same scenario applies to parent/child...in this case the children bonding to the parents.Also notice what denomination these people are, PCA. That is supposed to be the conservative wing of the Presbyterian denomination. The rot runs deep in the modern church. I am seeing homeschooling families pawn off their biological children to the public school system as they foster and/or adopt these type of children.

This Aron Halbert character is quoted in the article as saying "I felt sheer delight during this pregnancy watching my son and daughter, with his dark brown skin and her with the ringlet hair and slightly tan skin kiss my white wife’s growing belly...."

The phrase "my white wife" in this context is a dead giveaway that you're dealing with straight up kink, rather than just background cultural virtue signalling one-upsmanship.

lol @ the picture of the three african babies in the basket with hats on....looks like southron kitsch knickknackery from about 1920. My grandmother had that stuff all over the house.

I had a look at the video. He is leaning in, she sitting straight as a statue and looking forward though later she is looking at him - looked posed to me. I was wondering whether they had even consumated their marriage. Or was he firing blanks? I am thinking the former the more likely.

Rivers of blood, or terminal incompetence because the political class will always play one group against another, thus a society with no common identity can not be properly governed. Think Brazil or Mexico.

Man, those are some of the ugliest raisins I've ever seen! Fortunately, the destruction of the $IMFS will remove most of these degenerates from the gene pool. When this blows the suffering will be beyond comprehension. And the strong will not protect the genetica freakus as a future from the ashes of the degeneracy is formed. God help us all. It really didn't have to be this way.

"From this tangle of material and spiritual putrescence the blasphemies of an hundred dialects assail the sky. Hordes of prowlers reel shouting and singing along the lanes and thoroughfares, occasional furtive hands suddenly extinguish lights and pull down curtains, and swarthy, sin-pitted faces disappear from windows when visitors pick their way through."

I honestly feel sickened by that. And seeing a super duper SJW lesbian couple in my community trying to raise 2 adopted black boys from the hood, it's FUBAR on many levels, you can already see the kids are little predators.. it's like 2 hens trying to raise a fox

Those coco colored kids will turn on those 2 once they are exposed to other "Africans" i.e. the horrible QB Krapperprick, Odumbo and I'm sure many other examples. This is an obvious example of the woman in this relationship is really the man and she makes all the decisions. That guy will regret this and soon!

I honestly feel sickened by that. And seeing a super duper SJW lesbian couple in my community trying to raise 2 adopted black boys from the hood, it's FUBAR on many levels, you can already see the kids are little predators.. it's like 2 hens trying to raise a fox

That actually sounds hilarious. I wouldn't mind watching THAT reality show. Would put any other trainwrecks to shame.

As MG pointed out at Thosewhocansee blog, Progressives really ARE the new racists. Can we imagine a clearer example of White (Wo)Man's Burden, but to undertake not just the raising, feeding, sheltering and clothing but the gestation, too, of black people?

Truly, if someone in the 1980's or even 1990's had a time machine and simply cut and pasted random web pages from today, they'd have been involuntarily institutionalized as too crazy to be left to themselves.

Sometimes people criticize social forecasters for being too cautious. No one in their wildest imagination could have seen how far this would go. Will it go just as far in the other direction when the snap back arrives? (Shudder.)

They wanted to show us that skin color doesn't matter- by deliberating choosing a particular skin color for their children. Twice. Ffs, they even acknowledge it's important to have a matched set of kids. Which makes it clear that what they were really after was getting in an article like this one. Those poor children.

I know a lot of embryos are sitting around frozen, but wouldn't you need permission from the original parents? Or does the clinic own the embryos and can use them as they please?

That's a huge mess looming on the horizon for someday. Ownership of them isn't really settled across the US, except that they belong to the parents, and who knows about other countries. One man sued his ex-girlfriend after they broke up because he no longer wanted to have children with her (his new girlfriend was against it), so he wanted the embryos destroyed. Some states require the permission of both "parents" to dispose of embryos, which really points out the absurdity of current abortion law: a woman can't have her frozen embryos flushed without the father's agreement, but if they agree to implant one in her, then she could have it aborted later and he could do nothing. If the parents don't agree, they might just stay frozen indefinitely, and now there are as many as a million frozen embryos that will never be used.

If you're pro-life from conception, these are all people. But they can't survive without a mother, and there aren't a million volunteer wombs, so.....? This is part of why the Church has always opposed IVF, surrogates, and all these artificial shenanigans. Now theologians are kicking back and forth whether it's moral to "rescue" embryos like this woman did (the race insanity aside) when they're not wanted anymore, or whether that's worse than the crime that's already been done to them. And if your church does infant baptism, do you at least try to baptize them before they're discarded? You probably can't get their parents' permission, because that would imply they're flushing people.

It's a big mess. And these two idiots somehow found a way to make it messier.

On the topic of diversity worship ... I'm researching pirate radio for a novel in progress, and I remembered a story about a kid in Africa who built a radio station out of junk. It turned out to be BS on the same level as the "Clock Boy" story. He built a hand-cranked battery charger and hacked a portable radio into a low-power transmitter. That's about it. Any kid with a book of electronic projects could do the same. And he gets invited to speak at MIT.

People adopted by the same race and even nearly the same geographic ancestry as their biological parents exhibit differences far more profound than those noticed between parents and their biological children.

These people have No IDEA what they signed up for. I hope their smug, holier-than-thou self-satisfaction and purchase of this "good works" ticket into Heaven proves to be worth it. My guess is, eventually their lives will be a living hell.

Look around. We see one person after another demanding to purchase the last available ticket for a steerage berth on the USA Titanic. They're doubling down on a trend so far beyond its sell-by date that description is defied.

Cail Corishev wrote:This is part of why the Church has always opposed IVF, surrogates, and all these artificial shenanigans.

Yeah, I was one of those idiots that was okay with IVF and even testing of embryos when I was younger, because "science". Now I completely understand why the Church rejected this crap. We weren't meant to play God, so this type of crap needs to stop, post haste.

@87-Exactly. While it would be one thing if they approached it from, say, the perspective of a feudal Lord who took on a peasant as a ward to demonstrate how great he is, or even if they looked at it as virtuous Churchians out to demonstrate we're all God's chilluns. But one thing they can't get out of it is the pride of watching their progeny thrive.

@89-Or wouldn't say raising a child not of your race is wrong. Less right than picking a child of your own race to adopt, but I think it's permissible if you view it like you're patron, not an actual parent. I'd rather they view the kids as a family pet, even.

The wrong part is pretending you're a real family, virtue-signaling about it and lording it over normal people who view the arrangement as weird. Especially choosing to do it instead of having your own kids. That's the worst.

So, another way of looking at it is that they are incentivizing people to get embryos conceived and frozen.

Alternatively, they're trying to retroactively make other people not have sinned. Ask Jesus, he'll tell you that's not quite how that deal works out. So, question for any would-be cuckstains: Do you have the power to forgive sins? Are you pure enough to be sacrificed (redundantly) for other peoples' sins?

Held my nose and read the article at the link. But I couldn't help but crack a smile when I saw this Freudian slip from the cucked father:

Aaron beautifully describes his family: "I can remember a friend going through the adoption process telling me he had always wanted his family to look like a little United Nations."

Seriously, who are these people? Hate the Baby Boomers all you like, but when they saw the throwdown in Turtle Bay that ended with Kruschev banging his shoe on the table I somehow doubt that they responded by exclaiming, "I want MY home to be exactly like that!"

Ah well . . . When one of his sons knocks up his sister before going on a drug-fueled rampage that leaves half the neighborhood in flames, at least this fool of a father can take pride in having a family that also behaves like the real United Nations.

@83 dc.sunsets said"People adopted by the same race and even nearly the same geographic ancestry as their biological parents exhibit differences far more profound than those noticed between parents and their biological children."

There is a black dad-white mom next door. Their herd of mulattos act really uncivilized. They shout things across the yard that are no longer permitted on VP, with plenty of racial slurs mixed in. The youngest shows all the signs of regression to the black mean.

@47 Yes, I have been astounded to see this in homeschooling communities. I've been forced to acknowledge the profit aspect of this. Need farm hands, adopt. Handicapped parents need care-givers, adopt.All involved, brow-beat others to follow suit. Full plate already, foster. Quite the racket for local DSS.And when adopting family gets into hot water for over extending themselves, shame others into helping, while short-changing biological children.

DeploraBard wrote:Is it wrong to toss the chitlins with the pedoface and his mudwomb?Poor little pickaninnies did nothing wrong. It's not their fault.

tublecane wrote:Especially choosing to do it instead of having your own kids. That's the worst.And that's the problem. You want proof birth control makes women crazy? It's here in spades. I could see how a woman pathologically afraid of pregnancy or birth might try to avoid having kids. How on earth do you justify closing the womb to your husband and opening it to strangers?

And no, he's not shooting blanks. From a WaPo article:"When we were still dating, a common bond that drew us together was the fact that Rachel and I both wanted to adopt. While we were fertile, we were both deeply convicted that one of the ways to be pro-life is to involve ourselves in adoption."

Reading the same article, it seems to me that, while he is a full-on cuck, his real problem is that he hates his White skin and blond hair:"I grew up as a child of evangelical missionaries in Honduras, very aware of racial diversity because I was the blue-eyed, cotton-topped white kid who stuck out like a sore thumb, but all the while felt deeply connected to the people there, even though we looked very different."

@109-"Parent" actually has two, related definitions. One is being a father or mother. The other is the act of raising your child. I don't recognize people who raise other people's children as parents. (Not of those children, at least.) I do admit that is a widely accepted term, though. (See: the term "foster parent.")

People who produce children without raising them, on the other hand, are still parents. Funny how that works. Almost as if there's a biological connotation to the word. A strong biological connotation, because if you're raised by your grandmother, for instance, no one calls grandma your parent. She's just grandma.

VD and anyone who agrees with his loveless wicked view, y'all need to repent. So, the couple can't conceive naturally. So they START RESCUING THE FATHERLESS, prepared to bear the reproach of society, and all VD can say is "cuck"?

These children were FROZEN. By their parents who did not love them. For 15 YEARS. This couple has rescued and redeemed them from certain death by neglect, and you're griping because they don't look like their parents.

Somewhere in all your Alt-Right nation-signaling you forgot to serve Jesus, whom you falsely claim to follow; He will avenge Himself on all those who refuse to love neighbor, especially when their excuses are as lame as yours.

I have hope that we don't lose the technology in those rivers of blood... but even Tolkien alluded to this kind of dilemma. The elves knew that the destruction of the One Ring would be the "end of things", magic included.

My main concern is that if we go full Mad Max, warlords are going to scavenge up every last piece of electronics they can find and then put it all in acid in an effort to get the gold out. Imagine a city's worth of electronics. One garbage can of electronics yields roughly a quarter ounce of gold.

Now I know, and have argued with, the "Oh no big deal we just go back to the days of Moses and wear robes and only care about our ox getting gored or something".

Look. We have already been there. We ended up here. If we go back there, we end up back here again. How many times on this merry go round before we really discover the perfect combination of elements to plunge humanity in permanent darkness (or stupidity) forever BEFORE we can get out into space?

If we can "break out", slip the surly bonds of earth so to speak, and in a world of more open tech, this will be the big breakout. EVERYBODY will have Hoppean options of physical removal. Everybody getting stupid on earth? FInd a colony elsewhere. Oh you're an otherkin WTFBBQ whatever and don't feel comfortable on earth? Well here's a colony you can fly to and go weird it up with like-dysfunctional-minded folk (explorers will gather your crap later when you all die out).

But if we go into darkness, how many thousands of years will it take to crawl out of that hole IF EVER? And if we do, will the knowledge once more be sequestered and controlled so that when we finally do get into space it won't be competing elements (nations, corporations, etc.) but instead one country running it "East India Trading Company" style?

And the BS just keep rolling around over and over and over.

So while I do not fear the reaper so to speak, and the human race is in dire need of a correction (my opinion means nothing in all this it's going to happen no matter what I feel or say), I really don't want to see cuckery and stupidity win out and earth become a planet of street sh**ters.

@Rhology, I repeat the quote from the Washington Post:When we were still dating, a common bond that drew us together was the fact that Rachel and I both wanted to adopt. While we were fertile, we were both deeply convicted that one of the ways to be pro-life is to involve ourselves in adoption.

@128/129. Parenting is the act. Parenthood is a state of being a parent, which is only applicable in this case if you append the word "Foster" to the front of it. Just like any other conjoined word, ultimately it's either more of one or the other, and ultimately with "Foster parent" the functional word is always "Foster".

Hopefully you're aware, Benjamin, that adoptive is significantly different than foster.And that a frozen embryo has no connection to his biological sperm/egg donors other than purely biological. Everything else is from the adoptive family.

Any adoptee that has only ever had one set of parents understands perfectly what parenthood is, as do their parents.

Strange, how they so often go in search of their "real parents", then. How is that possible?

Look, it's wonderful to provide someone with a home who doesn't have one. There is no question that an adult can care for, and love, a child that is not their own.

And it is still absurd to claim that an adoptee is exactly the same as one's own child. That's simply not true. And as for cross-race adoptees, they still don't even identify with the family's race, although in my experience, adopted Korean girls did tend to prefer dating and marrying white men.

But then, so do many Asian women who are not adopted by whites, so that may be more about opportunity than anything else.

Strange, how they so often go in search of their "real parents", then.

Heck, just look at step-kids. I know a teenage girl who doesn't remember her birth mother, because her dad (somehow) got full custody when she was very young. She gets along with her stepmother about as well as stepdaughters usually do, but otherwise she's had it pretty well. And as soon as she's 18 and doesn't need permission, she's gonna go find her "real mother," even though she knows she'll probably be disappointed, and even though she doesn't want to hurt her dad and stepmom's feelings.

That's just how people are. That genetic bond is incredibly strong; only people who have never missed it can take it for granted enough to think it's easily replaced.

@150-"Exactitude of biology," what a weird term. You know, kids don't need to be very exact to Notice their parents are white and they're black. Do you figure this might have some impact on the strength with which they identify as the white people's kids? Like, maybe this merely biological fact may end up outweighing all the cultural baggage you can toss on about how a family is a family?

And their own quote from the article makes it clear that they want the world to know that they could conceive (were both fertile), so denying themselves that just added to the virtue of their choice. Lots of people adopt because they can't have their own kids; there's nothing so special about that in their minds. That's why they pointed out in their own words that they didn't have to.

@163. Even if you were sterile, intentionally going outside your community and your people instead of adopting from a soon-to-be single mother or something nearby? Why? Do you hate your people (your extended family) so much?

@149-As I said in an above post, I wouldn't mock them if they'd present themselves in terms off noblesse oblige or even "all God's chilluns" One-Wordism. It's the fact that pretend they're a normal family, take pride in showing off to their lessers, lord it over normal people who find the arrangement perverse, and above all else do it in place of having their own kids.

Take all that away, and fine, congratulate them for rescuing the kids. Although, as someone else said, this incentivizes to freeze their kids, which ought to be deterred.

From my own experience, these people are undoudetly batshit crazy behind the scenes. My super duper Catholic aunt and her husband who definitely didn't run the show, adopted 10 kids from India, Philippines and China on top of their own 7 natural kids. Occasionally windows of my aunys batshit crazyness would open for others outside thier immediate family. She was especially irritated that my nanna would not give an equal inheritance to the adopted kids she kept collecting. The natural grand kids all got trust funds. The adopted kids did get a significant sum though. We later found out that she took control of and then stole the inheritance from at least one of the adopted children and had another forge checks in my nanna name. It gets far worse from there but that give an accurate picture of her brand of virtue signaling. If these people are in keeping with the pattern, they majority compensating for some private baggage that will eventually come out.

So many problems with race and countries could be solved if people would just realize that you have to start with YOURSELF first, then YOUR FAMILY, then your people and community, THEN your country, THEN the world IF you even have any time left over (you almost certainly won't).

@177-Imagine a group of nuns running an orphanage, doing God's work. What if they actually thought of themselves as the foundlings' parents? I think we all automatically recognize that as being perverse, even though we don't doubt the nuns' virtue and good intentions.

Why should it be any different with a fake family, headed by a man and wife?

Look at the origin of the word, it derives from Latin ' "that which has been born," from natus, ...procreation and familial and tribal groups.'

And from the bible itself, the Greek word was 'genos':

'Genos: race, kind, nation, offspring.'

God knew that we are many different types of human. He made us that way. He did not encourage us to love foreigners (or take them as our families), only to love our neighbours, and also His might and glory.

So, satan is lying to us re diversity, for obvious reasons: it leads to chaos and destruction.

The writer of the article glorifying this couple and these children is doing the work of satan. Diversity is a sin unto God.

Gotta start from the center and work your way out, because the only place you touch the world is at the center (yourself).

Adopting other peoples' soon-to-be-murdered frozen babies is one thing. Trying to pretend that it's better than having your own is an insult to your people, your family, yourself and your God. End of story.

"And as for cross-race adoptees, they still don't even identify with the family's race, although in my experience, adopted Korean girls did tend to prefer dating and marrying white men."

I've noticed this too with Asian chicks. Plus I've noticed black women who will seek out or plain lust after white men so they can have mixed babies with quote unquote "good hair". Since, as YouTube personality and ardent black Trump supporter Tommy Sotomayor pointed out, (if you don't know who he is, Google him, he's frequently hilarious) no one freaks out more at seeing a mixed baby and how "pretty" it is than black chicks.

Mr. Rational wrote:This is the essential insanity of "pro-life": insisting that a blastocyst in a freezer is a human being with a right to be born. These people have merely done the full reductio ad absurdum.

Strawman. Cite a single pro-lifer who advocates such.

The blastocyst doesn't have a right to be born. Whose duty would it be to bear it to term? The possessor of the nearest available womb?

But it does not deserve to be treated as organic waste, and it is the moral responsibility of the clinic and the donors for creating this situation. Fertilizing many eggs, planting multiples, killing the "extras", and selling the dream of children to the barren at bloody cost.

"Any adoptee that has only ever had one set of parents understands perfectly what parenthood is, as do their parents."

Liv Tyler.

Biological daughter of Steve Tyler. Raised by Todd Rundgren.

Her mother was living with Todd Rundgren when she got pregnant by Tyler. Todd Rundgren signed the birth certificate stating he was the father (he wasn't 100% sure, but "manned up" and took responsibility). She was legally named Liv Rundgren, and he raised her as his own daughter.

Liv didn't know Rundgren wasn't her biological father for years, and didn't develop a relationship with Steve Tyler till she grew up.

But once she did, she changed her name to Liv Tyler and started referring to Steve Tyler as "Daddy".

And what about Todd Rundgren, the man that raised another man's child as his own? She's grateful; he "feels like Daddy", but she goes by her "real" Dad's name: Tyler.

Regarding the frozen embryos... that's the problem. Creating them to begin with is the sin. "Rescuing" them is participation in the bastardization of God's plan...And just what kind of physical issues will these formerly frozen embryos have? I know a woman who did IVF and it's sickness all around for her and her artificially created children. Created because pregnancy didn't happen fast enough, meaning in a year or so after marriage in early 20s, so no real need. "Christian" ob-gyn.

The blastocyst doesn't have a right to be born. Whose duty would it be to bear it to term?

Right. It has a "right to live," but no way to do it. You could make the case that it has a right to be raised by its own mother, but that's a moot point once she's beyond child-bearing years, and the longer this insane process continues, the more frozen babies will be in that situation. There are no good answers to it; hence the mess.

While you have a point, the ones that really get me are those who 'support and protect' these sorts. Why always whites though? No other species seems to miss this point. Though, thankfully, it isn't all whites and it is changing. Fast enough? There are some folk I would kick out just because. Though, I am pretty sure, when they realize they can have pride in being white, and realize how much of a threatened minority they really are, they might just switch. Currently, the main problem is the "education" system. Completely divest the government, in all ways, from education. Money to testing to hiring practices, and more. It's the only way, if just a start.

I'll bet, for inner cities, without outside funding? They will change from education to simple daily incarceration. No choice.

Hopefully, the children won't decide to become "authentically" black and turn into thugs and welfare mammas. If that happens, the parents will probably blame "white racism" rather than any qualities lacking in his little pets.

If he loves third-world people so much, why didn't he stay in Honduras or move to Haiti or some other black paradise.