On Sat, 2003-05-03 at 21:28, Michael D. Crawford wrote:
> But what if it isn't? Must we only have the black-and-white distinction that
> invariant sections or cover texts are never allowed, or could we allow them if
> they are truthful?
The cause is the non-freeness; one symptom of the non-freeness is that
inaccurate information must be preserved. Fixing the symptom doesn't
cure the cause.
Besides, I don't think -legal or the ftp masters want to become the
Truth Police.

Attachment:
signature.ascDescription: This is a digitally signed message part