Thursday, March 8, 2018

YouTube Purge of Social Media Threatens Full Disclosure; May Call for Direct and Unified Response from the People - Links and Commentary

If we are familiar with the recent update from whistleblower, Corey Goode, regarding the new possibilities for a full disclosure event, we will likely be eager to see what developments the coming weeks and months may bring. As of the writing of this article, there have been numerous developments which have revealed quite a bit about the various motives behind past disclosure attempts.

We will, of course, be at least somewhat familiar with the recent acts of censorship by social media giant, YouTube, but before covering that topic, let's address a more positive development for the goals of full disclosure.

As we may have read, the efforts at partial disclosure of the group headed by Tom Delonge were largely debunked as fraudulent. Early on, it was proposed by the Delonge disclosure efforts that authentic UFO photos submitted as evidence were proof that the UFO phenomenon was in fact real. However, not long after these photos were analyzed, it was discovered that they were of nothing more than a mylar party balloon.

It was very interesting to see this supposedly professional display of experts use allegedly false evidence to promote an idea they appeared to be adamant about. From these revelations, it seems likely that the powers behind Delonge intended to debunk Delonge's efforts themselves, and to possibly use the false photos as an excuse to dismiss the UFO phenomenon altogether.

Fortunately, the truth movement has come to be attentive enough to spot possible issues and head them off—usually before they balloon into huge problems. Though this was an important catch for the UFO community, and has assisted in removing one more obstacle from the path of complete revelation of all institutional secrecy on our planet.

Amid dozens of speculations of foul play, YouTube seems to be doing everything it can to feign innocence while still accomplishing what appears to be deliberate censorship. Though the platform apparently apologized about the supposedly accidental deletion of select, anti-establishment channels, the social media giant has done nothing to correct their proposed mistake. Meanwhile, it appears that every YouTuber who has dared to cross certain lines of sociopolitical narratives is being silenced or penalized outside of any written guidelines of YouTube.

There appears to be no official policy which justifies what the questionable social media platform has done as of late. If there were, the fact would have been stated each of the numerous times it penalized channels for supposed violations.

As things appear, the move to punish and delete select channels was focused on nothing more than silencing those who questioned the official narrative of the Parkland, Florida shooting. Yet even though these acts by Google and YouTube were uncalled-for, there are still numerous ways in which the people can move toward a full and complete disclosure of institutional secrecy in our world. We will discuss these in a moment, but first, here is Exopolitics and Dr. Michael Salla.

YouTube has begun purging its popular video hosting platform of channels that challenge the narrative coming out of the mainstream news media across a wide spectrum of topics. This has led to outright terminations and strikes against some of the more popular channels, which have been exhorting viewers to question the conventional news narrative.

These channels have been accused to be participating in hate speech or bullying due to them vigorously addressing controversial topics, transgressing norms of political correctness, or exploring evidence that some national tragedies may have been false flag attacks. Among the topics that appear to have attracted the attention of YouTube censors are disclosures by QAnon, which allegedly involves information released by covert U.S. Army Intelligence operatives.

The YouTube video purge not only has grave implications for free speech, but can also seriously impact on the prospects for full disclosure of secret space programs, UFO’s, and the advanced technologies and hidden intelligence behind these.

These subjects have been successfully kept secret for decades due to mainstream media either ignoring or ridiculing their seriousness, or by removing journalists from their positions for covering them. I found this out first hand as a “citizen journalist” for the Examiner.com online newspaper where I had over 50 million pages views for over 300 articles written from 2009 to 2015.

YouTube Apologizes to Right Wingers but Still has Not Reinstated Videos

* * * * *

Following the rash of censorship efforts, many former YouTubers opted to suit YouTube or its parent corporations for violation of 1st Amendment rights. These people may be successful in their efforts. However, it may be even more beneficial if those who have been wronged banded together to launch their own class action lawsuit.

There is much to be said about the possibilities surrounding a class action lawsuit against YouTube and its parent companies. For a general understanding, let's turn to Wisegeek.org for the details.

What is a Class Action Lawsuit?

A class action lawsuit is filed on behalf of a group of people who have been in some way injured by the actions of a company. It is common to see such lawsuits filed by members of the company if hiring or salary practices have been illegal. Another type is filed against a drug company for making illegal claims about their product, or for causing deaths or physical damage to those taking the drug.When someone joins a class action lawsuit, he usually has to sign papers declaring that he then forfeits the right to sue the company as an individual. A successful suit awards damages to the plaintiffs, who are those suing the company, according to greatest damage. In most cases, not all members of the suit are entitled to equal compensation. Usually, the attorneys work on a contingency basis, which means that they will receive a portion of the award but charge their clients no fees if the suit is not successful. That portion can be high, ranging from 30% to 50% of the total award.Awards from a class action suit are split into two portions: punitive and compensatory damages. Compensatory damages are meant to address the defendants (those being sued), and direct damage. These funds will be used to address actual damages caused by the defendants, such as illness, loss of life, and/or pain and suffering. Punitive damages are a form of punishment for the company committing the illegal acts, or causing harm. Punitive damages in large lawsuits can be particularly high, when it is demonstrated the company has shown great disregard for the health, safety or emotional well being of the plaintiffs.

This excerpt gives a general description of the method of the class action lawsuit. However, I would encourage everyone to read further in order to make the most of the situation at hand. There may be even more we can do as a collective to hold questionable companies such as YouTube accountable.

The question also came to mind of just how many people are needed to launch a class action lawsuit. For those details, let's look at Classaction.com.

HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE NEEDED FOR A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT?While there is technically no minimum number of people needed for a class action, it is difficult (although not unheard of) to get a case with fewer than 40 individuals certified.It only takes one person to file a class action lawsuit, but in order for a class action to proceed, a judge must first certify the class. Judges exercise some discretion when making the certification decision, but they do so within the context of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Procedure, which says that a class action is appropriate when “the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable.”But so-called “numerosity” is not the only class action prerequisite. Rule 23 also states that there must be “questions of law or fact common to the class” (commonality); that the claims of those who file the class action on behalf of others are typical of the claims of the class (typicality); and that those filing the lawsuit “will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class” (adequacy of representation).When plaintiffs’ lawyers move to certify the class action, a judge will consider the numerosity of the class. Yet supposing that the judge deems the number of class members to be adequate, if the other requirements of commonality, typicality, and adequacy of representation are not met, the class won’t be certified.

As things appear, there is no specific number needed in order for a judge to approve the lawsuit, but as always, professional legal advice is a good thing in such cases.

We might also be interested to know that Google and their parent company Alphabet Inc. have endured multiple class action lawsuits in the past. Though these have been insubstantial or are still pending, it may be wise to seize this opportunity. For more information on those suits, click the links below.

From what I can see, there is no justifiable reason in the year 2018, in a country which boasts the notion of freedom, for a publicly owned company to behave as YouTube has as of late. Further, there is no ethical reason why any company dares to violate the American constitution so flagrantly by attempting to silence citizens for nothing more than the act of disagreeing with the establishment.

If Alphabet, Google, or YouTube are intentionally attempting to silence or intimidate users from speaking their minds freely, it is only fair that the people push back against these alleged crimes. These companies cannot be allowed to bully their users while claiming that the users are doing the bullying. Whenever manipulative people or organizations are caught (or fear being caught), they will commonly use this tactic of victim-blaming in order to hide their own wrongdoing. Yet at the same time they attempt this divertive tactic, they often confess their own intentions.

As things appear, YouTube intends to bully its users into submission to established narratives. If this is the case, this does not seem to be working. The people do not seem to be interested in playing these games any longer. Whether or not it takes a class action lawsuit, a mass exodus away from bullying platforms such as YouTube, or further legal charges against online censors, the people will have their say, I predict.

Whatever the resolution to this situation is, one thing seems clear. Various aspects of corporate and social media seem 100 percent invested in colluding with Cabal interests. These companies have shown no sign of independent intent to defy apparently criminal agendas. If this is true, this could be a very bad thing for these media accomplices of Cabal criminals.

As things presently appear, if and when elitist criminals go down, many of the executives within the MSM and social media may go down with them.

Discerning the Mystery is a website dedicated to awakening and educating the people to their true potential of mental, spiritual, emotional, and physical growth. It can be difficult work, but if just one person benefits from these efforts, it is entirely worth it. If you enjoy what you read here, please give the post a like and share on social media. Also, if you enjoyed this article, please consider leaving a donation.

Feel free to send us an email and tell us what you think. If you have any suggestions or subjects you would like to see discussed, please let us know.