Ex-Pompey player Sam Sodje goes on trial for money laundering

There are fears the ‘UK cat killer’ has struck in Sussex

Three footballer brothers including former Pompey player Sam Sodje helped launder cash from an £80,000 international fraud, a court heard.

Retired Premier League player Sam Sodje – who also appeared for Reading and Charlton Athletic, and represented Nigeria – along with siblings Efe and Akpo, were allegedly involved in channelling proceeds from the scam which targeted firms in Colombia, India, Italy and Abu Dhabi.

Sam and Efe Sodje are on trial at the Old Bailey along with two other men, Emmanuel Ehikhamen and Andrew Oruma.

Akpo Sodje now lives in Dubai and has declined to return to Britain to be interviewed by detectives.

Prosecutor Julian Christopher QC told jurors the total fraud over the course of a month in 2013 amounted to just under £80,000.

He said: ‘This case is about international money laundering. In November 2013 a number of companies around the world – in Colombia, India, Italy and Abu Dhabi – were the victims of fraud.

‘They were sent emails which they thought came from their suppliers to whom they owed money, but the emails provided new, false, bank details to which the money should apparently be sent.

‘There were two bank accounts to which these companies were tricked into sending money. One belonged to the first defendant, Emmanuel Ehikhamen, the other to a man named Akpo Sodje, brother of the defendants Efe Sodje and Sam Sodje.

‘The prosecution allege that all four of them and also the defendant Andrew Oruma were involved in an arrangement to facilitate the receiving and onward transmission of money which had been obtained by these frauds, keeping some as financial rewards for their assistance.’

Mr Christopher told jurors there was no evidence any of the defendants were involved in the actual fraud. The evidence against them came from the way the money was passed between bank accounts as well as text and WhatsApp messages.

The prosecutor said the issue in the trial would be whether the defendants received money, transferred it on or withdrew it in cash knowing or suspecting it was the proceeds of crime.