This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising.
By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy.
You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site.
To learn more see our Cookies Policy.

The fire service said it is now implementing recommendations based on an investigation into the claim.

DUBLIN FIRE BRIGADE has said it is implementing recommendations after an investigation into the alleged leaking of an exam for firefighters last year.

In January 2017, more than 170 firefighters applied for positions as subofficers, which is the first rung on the promotion ladder in the fire service. The promotions are given based on interviews and a written exam.

TheJournal.ie understands that the service received a report from a whistleblower claiming that a number of firefighters were told questions from an exam paper in the weeks leading up to the test. The details were alleged to have come through phonecalls and text messages.

It is understood a complaint was initially made to the fire service’s human resources department and followed up with a protected disclosure by a firefighter.

One source within the fire service said it had been alleged that favoured firefighters – in some cases friends or family members of higher ranking staff - were given the details of the exam.

“They maybe did a job for someone or were someone’s mate or nephew – it was cronyism basically,” they said. They also said the average grade in the exam was above 90%.

Another source said there was “a huge amount of anger” in the fire service when people heard that the test may have been leaked.

People thought we had come into an era where that things were going to be different in the brigade and that it was going to be pure, honest competition – as much as it could be. Then it came out that it had been leaked and with some people [who scored highly], it was very apparent.

A spokesperson for Dublin Fire Brigade confirmed a protected disclosure investigation was carried out and said “the recommendations from that investigation are being implemented”.

The spokesperson did not give details of the recommendations, but it is understood they include the involvement of an independent body in future examinations.

TheJournal.ie is a full participating member of the Press Council of Ireland and supports
the Office of the Press Ombudsman. This scheme in addition to defending the freedom of the
press, offers readers a quick, fair and free method of dealing with complaints that they may
have in relation to articles that appear on our pages. To contact the Office of the
Press Ombudsman Lo-Call 1890 208 080 or go to
www.pressombudsman.ie
or www.presscouncil.ie

Please note that TheJournal.ie uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. For more information on cookies please refer to our cookies policy.

Journal Media does not control and is not responsible for user created content, posts, comments, submissions or preferences. Users are reminded that they are fully responsible for their own created content and their own posts, comments and submissions and fully and effectively warrant and indemnify Journal Media in relation to such content and their ability to make such content, posts, comments and submissions available. Journal Media does not control and is not responsible for the content of external websites.