The journal Food and Chemical
Toxicology (FCT) has accepted for publication a new study that links exposure
to Monsanto's Roundup herbicide, the active ingredient of which is glyphosate,
to severe endocrine disruption and breast cancer. And the worst part is that
the chemical was found to elicit these and other harmful effects at virtually
imperceptible levels in the parts per trillion range, which is far below the
levels that commonly occur in the environment and the food supply as a result
of misguided corporate agriculture practices.

by Christina England If you thought things in the world of
vaccines could not get any worse, then you were wrong. Mayor Michael Bloomberg
of New York City has called for a public hearing on Wednesday, October 23,
2013, recommending that all children under the age of five whose parents want
them to attend day care facilities be vaccinated with the annual flu
vaccination and pneumococcal vaccines before they are accepted...

Profiteers
in the medical CT scan business took a big hit last week from a major new
government report on the causes of breast cancer.Published
by the Institute of Medicine (IOM), the health arm of the National Academy of
Sciences, the exhaustive analysis found that medical radiation, particularly
the large radiation dose delivered by CT scans, is the foremost identifiable
cause of breast cancer.[1]CT
Scans may cause 29,000 cancers and 15,000 cancer deaths every yearNBC
News said in 2009 that each whole-body CT scan can deliver as much radiation in
10 minutes as 440 chest X-rays.[5]To all the readers of
this site: please share this with the women you care about.

This week, a National Cancer Institute commissioned panel’s report published
in JAMA online confirmed that we all –
public and professionals alike – should stop calling low-risk lesions like DCIS
and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) ‘cancer.’

There are wide-reaching implications to this recommendation, including:

Millions of women in this country have been
diagnosed with DCIS, and millions of men with HGPIN, and subsequently
[mis]treated. Are they now to be retroactively reclassified as ‘victims’
of iatrogenesis, with legal recourse to seek compensation?

Anyone engaged in a cancer screening will now
need to reconsider and weigh both the risks and benefits of such a
‘preventive’ strategy, considering that the likelihood of being diagnosed
with a false positive over 10 years is alreadyover 50% for women undergoing
annual breast screening.

The burgeoning pink ribbon-bedecked ‘breast
cancer awareness’ industry will be forced to reformulate its message, as
it is theoretically culpable for the overdiagnosis and overtreatment of
millions of US women by propagating an entirely false concept of ‘cancer.’

The
practice of oncology in the United States is in need of a host of reforms and
initiatives to mitigate the problem of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of
cancer, according to a working group sanctioned by the National Cancer
Institute.

Perhaps
most dramatically, the group says that a number of premalignant conditions,
including ductal carcinoma in situ and high-grade prostatic
intraepithelial neoplasia, should no longer be called “cancer.”

Instead,
the conditions should be labeled something more appropriate, such as indolent
lesions of epithelial origin (IDLE), the working group suggests. The Viewpoint
report was published online
July 29 in JAMA.

Fundamentally, overdiagnosis results from the fact that screen-detected
‘cancers’ are disproportionately slower growing ones, present with few to no
symptoms, and would never progress to cause harm if left undiagnosed and
untreated.

As you can see by the graph above, it is the fast-growing tumors which
will be more difficult to ‘detect early,’ and will progress rapidly enough to
cause symptoms and perhaps even death unless treated aggressively. But even in
the case of finding the tumor early enough to contain it through surgery,
chemotherapy and/or radiation,
it is well-known that the minority subpopulation of cancer stem cells within
these tumors will be enriched and therefore made more malignant through
conventional treatment. For instance,
radiotherapy radiation wavelengths were only recently found by UCLA Jonnsson Comprehensive
Cancer Center researchers to transform breast cancer cells
into highly malignant cancer stem-cell like cells, with 30 times higher malignancy post-treatment.

What this means is that
not only are millions of screen-detected abnormalities not ‘cancer’ in the
first place but even those which can be considered fast-growing are often being
driven into greater malignancy by the conventional chemotherapy, radiation and
surgery-based standard of cancer care itself.

Our entire world view of
cancer needs to shift from an enemy that “attacks” us and that we must wage war
against, to something
our body does, presumably to survive an increasingly inhospitable,
nutrient-deprived, carcinogen- and radiation-saturated environment, i.e. Cancer
As An Ancient Survival Mechanism Unmasked.

“The word
“cancer” often invokes the specter of an inexorably lethal process; however,
cancers are heterogeneous and can follow multiple paths, not all of which
progress to metastases and death, and include indolent disease that causes no
harm during the patient’s lifetime.”

We must keep in mind that this proposed redefinition of cancer is no
small academic matter, but will affect the lives of millions of women. Consider
that every year, approximately 60,000 women in this country are diagnosed with
DCIS, a diagnosis so traumatic that it results
in significant psychiatric depression 3 years after even a ‘false positive’ diagnosis.
For those less fortunate women, numbering in the millions over the past 30
years, who were told they had ‘cancer’ and needed to undergo lumpectomy,
radiation, chemotherapy and/or mastectomy, the NCI panel’s recommendation is a
hard pill swallow after the damage has already been irrevocably done.

So, what’s the solution? There is a growing movement towards the use of
thermography as a primary diagnostic tool, as it uses no ionizing radiation,
and can detect the underlying physiological processes that may indicate
inflammation, angiogenesis, cancer-specific metabolic changes, etc., many years
before a calcified lesion would appear within an x-ray mammogram. Also, the
mainstay of any truly preventive strategy against cancer is diet, nutrition,
exercise and avoiding chemical and radiation exposures – the things that we can
do in our daily lives to take back control of and responsibility for our
health.

Sayer Ji is the founder of
GreenMedInfo.com, an author, researcher, lecturer, and an advisory board member
of the National Health Federation. Google Plus
Profile.He founded Greenmedinfo.com in
2008 in order to provide the world an open access, evidence-based resource
supporting natural and integrative modalities. It is widely recognized as the
most widely referenced health resource of its kind.

A bogus scientific paper about a new
anti-cancer compound was accepted by more than half of 300 scientific journals
it was submitted to in the past year, despite having obvious and serious
scientific flaws. Science journalist John Bohannon reported the results of his
experiment in the journal Science. Bohannon, who holds a PhD in
molecular biology and is a visiting scholar at Harvard University’s program in
ethics and health, ... concluded [that] “a huge proportion” of the journals
were not ensuring their papers were peer reviewed. Even in cases where peer
review happened, it didn’t always function correctly. For example, the
Ottawa-based International Journal of Herbs and Medicinal Plants
clearly sent the paper out to be reviewed by real scientists, who pointed out
some flaws, Bohannon recalled. Even so, when Bohannon submitted a revised
version of the paper without correcting any of the flaws, it was accepted.
Bohannon said peer review is “crucial” so that readers of a scientific paper
know it has “at least passed muster with a couple of experts who are in a
position, hopefully, to judge. It could be the whole peer review system is just
failing under the strain of the tens of thousands of journals that now exist.”
He added that if peer review isn’t working, then people with what
amounts to fraudulent scientific credentials and publication records “are
slowly filling university departments and government offices, making important
science-based policy decisions.” In addition, “terrible science” is polluting
the global pool of knowledge."

(NaturalNews) No matter how many times
the US Transportation Security Administration (TSA) claims the machines are
safe and pose no threat to travelers or personnel, naked body scanners that
emit ionizing radiation are, indeed, a very serious health threat.

Waking TimesUltrasound has become routine during
pregnancy over the last 3 decades. It is assumed to be safe, though safety was
never investigated. Research is now finally being done, and the results are
dismal, demonstrating clear and permanent brain damage, as shown in this study.
Nearly all babies have been damaged to varying degrees, resulting in abnormal
neurology becoming the norm.That delightful ultrasound look at a fetus months before birth is a huge
thrill—but that’s the only benefit. That thrill comes at a risk, one that it’s
hard to imagine any parent would be willing to take if the facts were
presented. Ultrasound causes brain damage and can even kill the fetus. This is
not a supposition. It’s been clearly documented, and exactly what it does to
the developing brain is understood.Dr. Jennifer Margulis points out in
her brilliant new book, The Business of Baby:Manuel Casanova M.D., a neurologist
who holds an endowed chair at the University of Louisville in Kentucky, contends
that Rakic’s mice research helps confirm a disturbing hypothesis that he and
his colleagues have been testing for the last three years: that ultrasound
exposure is an environmental factor directly contributing to the exponential
rise in autism.[1]

The Study

Dr. Pasko Rakic is the lead researcher
for the study documenting that ultrasound damages mouse brains.[2] It
shows that the process of brain development is disturbed in mice. Though it’s
easy to suggest that this is “only” a study on mice, so doesn’t prove anything
about humans, that’s not true. The method of development in mouse brains is
exactly the same in all mammals. Therefore, if ultrasound has an adverse effect
on mouse brains, then it must also have the same effect on human brains.

The Brain’s Cellular Organization

Brain cells are not arranged in a
random manner. The brain’s gray matter controls muscles, sensory perception,
emotion, and memory. Gray matter cells form columns, which can function as a
unit. The cells are also arranged in rows that are parallel to the surface of
the brain. You can think of the brain’s cells as being arranged in a grid, like
a graph. Each cell forms part of both a column and a row, though the row is
actually curved to match the surface of the brain.If developing cells do not end up
where they should, behavioral problems and epilepsy can arise from the
misarrangement. It’s obvious that anything capable of causing such
misarrangement can produce disabilities. Therefore, Dr. Rakic’s study is
particularly disturbing.

Brain Cell Migration

A fetus’s neurons are formed in the
area just above the cerebellum, sometimes called the “primitive brain”, and
they progress toward the outer surface of the brain. During the process, they
are moved outward, parallel to the brain’s surface. The study report goes
into some detail about how this process happens, but for our purposes, there’s
no need to address it.How and when this process occurs is
well understood, though the means by which cells move radially, away from the
column in which they start, is not well understood. What is known, though, is
that the process is very sensitive and can be affected by many biological,
physical, and chemical agents. The authors state:For example, repeated exposure of
the rodent and primate fetal brain to environmental
agents, such as alcohol (9), drugs (22), neurotrophic viruses (23), and
ionizing irradiation (24, 25), causes misplacement of neurons and
behavioral deficits.The numbers in parentheses identify
study references documenting things that can result in displacement of neurons
and the results.

Partial Conclusion

This study shows that ultrasound waves
directed at a fetus interfere with brain development by causing displacement of
neurons. Such displacement is known to result in behavioral problems and are
either known or suspected of causing other neurological problems.Dr. Rakic and his team have produced a
powerful study that clearly demonstrates brain damage produced by ultrasound.
This prenatal test has become so routine that some doctors do screenings at
every visit. Though individual procedures don’t take 3½ to 7 hours (210-420
minutes), it’s easy to see that a baby could easily be exposed to an aggregate
of that much. Such results need to be taken seriously.There’s even more to know about
ultrasound during pregnancy—such as the fact that it doesn’t even produce any
benefits. This, and more about prenatal ultrasound are discussed in the
next article, Ultrasound Causes Brain Damage in Fetuses: Implications.

Abstract

Solid tumors, including the aggressive
primary brain cancer glioblastoma multiforme, develop resistance to cell death,
in part as a result of a switch from mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation to
cytoplasmic glycolysis. This metabolic remodeling is accompanied by
mitochondrial hyperpolarization. We tested whether the small-molecule and
orphan drug dichloroacetate (DCA) can reverse this cancer-specific metabolic
and mitochondrial remodeling in glioblastoma. Freshly isolated glioblastomas
from 49 patients showed mitochondrial hyperpolarization, which was rapidly
reversed by DCA. In a separate experiment with five patients who had
glioblastoma, we prospectively secured baseline and serial tumor tissue,
developed patient-specific cell lines of glioblastoma and putative glioblastoma
stem cells (CD133+, nestin+ cells), and treated each
patient with oral DCA for up to 15 months. DCA depolarized mitochondria,
increased mitochondrial reactive oxygen species, and induced apoptosis in GBM
cells, as well as in putative GBM stem cells, both in vitro and in vivo. DCA
therapy also inhibited the hypoxia-inducible factor–1α, promoted p53 activation, and suppressed
angiogenesis both in vivo and in vitro. The dose-limiting toxicity was a
dose-dependent, reversible peripheral neuropathy, and there was no hematologic,
hepatic, renal, or cardiac toxicity. Indications of clinical efficacy were
present at a dose that did not cause peripheral neuropathy and at serum concentrations
of DCA sufficient to inhibit the target enzyme of DCA, pyruvate dehydrogenase
kinase II, which was highly expressed in all glioblastomas. Metabolic
modulation may be a viable therapeutic approach in the treatment of
glioblastoma.

The short version is that dichloroacetate (DCA) causes
regression in several cancers, including lung, breast, and brain tumors. But
don;t expect it to be available any time soon. The reason? Conventional cancer
chemotherapy runs $9000 a month and DCA only costs $100 a month.

Sayer Ji, Contributing Writer
Activist PostEvery once in a while a study pops up
on the National Library of Medicine's bibliographic database known as MEDLINE
that not only confirms the therapeutic relevance of natural substances in
cancer treatment, but blows the conventional approach out of the water...

A report by one of the world’s leading
medical journals has supported earlier findings that Yasser Arafat, the late
leader of the Palestine Liberation Organization, was poisoned to death nearly a
decade ago.According to British journal the
Lancet, Arafat was poisoned with the radioactive element polonium 210.The journal published a peer review of
last year’s research by Swiss scientists, who have been researching the
suspicious circumstances surrounding Arafat’s death.Arafat's autopsy was
completed on June of this year. It is now October and the results still have
not been released (although the usual anonymous sources claimed the results
would show Arafat died of AIDS). So one might presume some serious political
pressure has been applied to prevent the cause of death from being announced
... which tells us all we need to know about the cause of death. The above Lancet article
confirms what was already known from samples of the clothing Arafat wore when
he died; he was poisoned with polonium 210. This is a favored Assassination
weapon of Israel because not only does it kill the target, but does so in a
particularly cruel fashion. Alexander Litvinenko, a suspected Russian/Israel
double agent, is another well known victim of this method of assassination.

This documentary chronicles the rise
of Germany from defeat in WWI, communist attempts to take over Germany,
hyperinflation during the Weimar Republic, widespread unemployment and misery,
and Hitler’s rise to power.There’s too much hidden history to
recount here – FDR Pearl Harbor conspiracy, Soviet brutality, the root causes
of WWII, etc. You will have to watch, do your own research, and decide what to
believe.This film has now been updated to
include the full 6-hours of hidden history for your consideration.

My Disclaimer:

I present this information in my capacity as a human being, under Common Law, exercising my fundamental God given rights and freedoms. This information represents my private thoughts and beliefs and has been compiled and expressed for educational purposes only. In no way should it be construed as either legal or financial advice. If anyone feels a need to determine the accuracy of this information and the effectiveness of apply any of it, I strongly recommend consulting a competent expert on this subject matter.

Here's a Clue:Look the one place "They" never talk about.Look to your heart, as your competent expert lies within."Seek and you shall find."