Put Woodson in there instead. At least on D, Woodson will blitz the QB and/or come up and play against the run. Baby Boy Sanders would run the other way if he had to take on a RB.

Playing WR? Woodson could do that too....
:tt1

SteelTorch

05-09-2009, 01:44 PM

There is nothing fun about type 2 diabetes my friend... :lol:

Ugh...this is what happens when I haven't had enough sleep. Sorry, folks. The link has been fixed. :HeadBanger

And just FYI, no, I'm not diabetic. It was for research I was doing. :oops:

RuthlessBurgher

05-11-2009, 10:13 AM

The iron-man two-way player format they devised for a top 11 was an interesting twist.

Could Joe Greene have been an Alan-Faneca-like LG if given the chance there?

Even more interesting...what kind of a TE would Lawrence Taylor be?

papillon

05-11-2009, 10:54 AM

The iron-man two-way player format they devised for a top 11 was an interesting twist.

Could Joe Greene have been an Alan-Faneca-like LG if given the chance there?

Even more interesting...what kind of a TE would Lawrence Taylor be?

I don't know about that, but, I think that Blount as CB and WR would be a better option than Deion. Don't get me wrong, Deion was probably the best cover corner to play the game, he simply eliminated half of the field. But, he didn't tackle as good as Mel and wasn't as big as Blount; I'd take Blount.