A full two-thirds of the earthquake casualties in Haiti on January 12, 2010 were directly due to policies that the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), World Bank, and United States Agency for International Development (USAID) put in place to create surplus labor for the country’s sweatshops.

The now well-known reductions in the tariffs on agricultural products, flood of subsidized Arkansas rice on the Haitian market, and eradication of the locally adapted creole pig were all components of a well mapped-out plan to impoverish Haitian farmers and force their migration from their villages to the capital city of Port-au-Prince.

In this way, about 1.6 million Haitians were added in 30 years to about 800,000 people who were already in the area that would become the earthquake’s epicenter. Since that disaster, there has been a nearly complete eradication of Haitian agriculture and a simultaneous dissipation of the Haitian population to prevent a major famine and popular revolt.

This process has required a collaboration of the Latin American member countries of the United Nations’ so-called peacekeeping mission (MINUSTAH) and Haiti’s richest families.....

LOL I just came to post the same thing. Got the URL loaded in and you beat me to it.

Just think, they are not scaling down or reforming the CGI, they're closing the doors! If the Initiative did do good works, what about the poor people they helped? They're SOL I guess. I won't be surprised when the MSM doesn't report this in any depth but holy shit. This is a gigantic red flag. I mean, what a story with all the whos, whats and whys! Maybe they'll even throw a "where" into the mix as in Where Is Eric Braverman?

Re the closing of CGI, I got some pushback on another forum over this matter and it seems this closing may not be as nefarious as I had thought. (I haven't fessed up about my new doubts over there yet.) But when I googled CGI closing down the most legit looking source is the NY Observer which is headed by Trump's son in law. Other right wing sites said it too. Then, Snopes says Bill Clinton announced last August they'd be downscaling the CGI and and ending annual meetings as of 2017. Is not a gotcha best when their own side announces a failure, like say in the NYT or WP? Nothing there yet. Nor has Charles Ortel mentioned this in his site yet. So, unless or until you or another TNLer can show me more evidence that the CGI closing is related to the Foundation fraud case I will tamp down my schadenfreude impulse.

Just days after being summoned to appear before Trey Gowdy’s congressional committee to testify about Hillary Clinton’s email server, one of her aides was found dead at home of “natural causes.”

John Wilson McGill, 34, was pronounced dead on his couch by a private doctor after suffering an apparent heart attack. A spokesman for Clinton’s former campaign said that Huma Abedin, Clinton’s deputy campaign coordinator, found McGill when she stopped by for coffee.

Abedin told police in a statement that McGill suffered from an abnormal heart arhythmia and that his doctor had always said a sudden and massive cardiac event was a possibility. She also told her publicist to make sure that the whole world didn’t knew that he was planning to cooperate with the congressional panel.

Trey Gowdy's office had no official statement but his top aide, said that the committee isn't happy with the circumstances of McGill's death or the fact that [a] private doctor was summoned to pronounce [him dead]. Abedin says she called the private doctor because she hoped he could save her friend.

Comment: He was already dead...how then do you hope to save him. If he wasn't dead wouldn't calling 9/11, an ambulance or paramedic team be the choices?

There will be no autopsy on the body, which will be cremated in accordance with his religion. McGill is the single son of deceased parents and has no family. No services are planned.

Does this whole thing seem a little bit odd to anyone else? It feels oddly like we've seen things like this happen before to people who could possibly incriminate Hillary Clinton. Unfortunately, as the doctor who pronounced has an impeccable record, the findings will be accepted and entered into public record.

Looks like she got away with another one.

A suggestion: why not summon others like Podesta and see what happens to their health? just to test this theory of course._________________"Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend." - Bruce Lee
"Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth." - Buddha

I can't take the Q thing seriously, having been keeping an eye on it for months now. Surely it's a LARP? For what purpose, I really don't know, but I find it impossible to believe that it is what it presents itself as._________________My real name is Gerry.

I tried listening to it a couple of times but it was so completely un-interesting that I never got through it.

I don't know what it is but it's had lots of attention from the types that stink of being CIA useful idiots, not least Jerome Corsi, who appears to have risen to prominence without trace as a result of having been anointed by Alex Jones as the infallible and authoritative interpreter of the Q texts. Then there's a host of YouTube channels which suddenly attracted thousands of subscribers to view their daily updates as they examined the entrails of each new cryptic Q post. And there's a whole spectrum of different personality types - Tracy Beanz, Lionel Nation, "praying medic", "American Intelligence Media", "Calm Before The Storm", "Justinformed Talk", "Destroying the Illusion" and many, many others - so that every "truth seeker" can find some flavour that suits their own personal taste.

"What do you want to believe and how many minutes or hours do you want to spend each day confirming your conclusions? There's bound to be at least one internet Q-star who can provide you with just what you're looking for. "

It all has echoes of the diversionary misdirection of the 911 truther movement which was definitely orchestrated and controlled by the spooks so I'm tending towards thinking that this is similar.

On the other hand, it may just be a cunning political stratagem to keep one group of potential voters motivated to vote for pro-Trump people in the crucial mid-term elections. That is to say, it might have started that way and have subsequently spun out of control to an extent that wasn't anticipated or planned for. However, if it does help to get some of the pro-Trump vote out in November and that consequently stops the NWO puppets from derailing the presidency, it could be considered as a smart bit of social media-savvy planning.

I reckon it's definitely a psy-op; the question is whether it's a malign one emanating from the Deep State or whether it's just an unusually imaginative piece of political campaigning, using a new approach to hook in potential supporters who might otherwise ignore the standard political process.
There's also a third possibility (at least) - the entire thing is simply a remarkably successful hoax for its own sake, perpetrated by the kind of psychologically unhealthy minds that get a kick from manipulating and deceiving people simply because they can. These are the kinds of people who would never miss an opportunity to stamp on an earthworm or hide someone's car keys or spoil someone's day in any way they can because they get their jollies purely from knowing that they've caused pain or chaos or confusion or disruption somewhere. Sad, sick people. (Of course, these are not necessarily distinct from CIA-controlled assets if they've been identified as useful.)

I really don't know. But I do feel that while it hasn't revealed one single piece of exclusive, subsequently verified information which couldn't have come from anyone who spends a lot of time studying whatever sources and reports are in the public domain, it nevertheless seems to have encouraged a lot of people to look into certain allegations and theories for themselves. Since many of these people start to seriously consider a non-orthodox world view for the first time in their lives, that, in itself, is not a bad thing. Even if it started off with that intention, it's now over-reached itself and may ultimately prove to be counterproductive. Many people who've become highly motivated and expecting to see certain results after following Q for months are going to be seriously disillusioned once they really they've been duped.

It's pretty weird how many people seem to be completely devoted to it though. It looks to me as if it has become a cult. Everyone is categorised either as a believer who's keeping the faith and trusting the Plan (whatever the Plan actually is) or else as a troll, sent by the Deep State to destroy the only remaining obstacle to their unstoppable global domination. There's no middle ground for debate amongst the Q following. If you're not with them, you're against them and therefore you're their implacable enemy._________________My real name is Gerry.