Statement from the Candidate

In 2010 I ran an unsuccessful campaign for the United States Congress, but I'm still posting blogs that I believe express an opinion that most other people miss, and that I also believe can make America great again and cast off the yoke of liberal/progressive control that is currently in place.

Friday, July 29, 2016

From Pretty in Pink to Lying in White, Hillary has
shown a love for her pantsuits, and she wore one again at her DNC acceptance
speech, this latest time wearing a more formal white to offset the dark lies she
so easily tells.

Hillary’s daughter, Chelsea’s, calm, slow-paced, measured,
practiced introduction of Hillary at the final night of the DNC was a bit
phony, but it set the stage to introduce a loving Mom and a non-partisan
politician who only wants to help the common man and woman survive in a mad, mad
world. But Hillary’s own speech was as phony as Chelsea’s intro. During the speech
Hillary was still pitching her ”It Takes A Village” ideas and paired that position
with the liberal “You Didn’t Build That” pitch that prevents American individuals
and corporations from excelling and growing the economy as was always done
prior to Obama’s reign of error.

Of course we had to put up with shots of Hillary’s
lip-biting, head-bobbling, pan-faced, mouth-breathing husband, our beloved Bill,
as he swooned adoringly while watching Chelsea and Hillary on stage, but
Hillary soon took a few chunks out of Bill when she made references to her past
tribulations, largely caused by Bill, which she claimed she always rose above
and overcame. The camera was not on Bill as these critical words were spoken,
so we don’t know if he got the put-down or not, but I’m sure he continued to
bite his lower lip and grin like a fool at his beloved Hillary (but he was
probably recalling the 26 flights he took on the Lolita Express to destinations
we can’t discuss in polite, mixed company, and which the liberal press will not
mention at all).

Hillary wasted no time lying to the audience, first
with her pretend happiness that the “oil industry that just had its best year
ever”, but she forgot to mention her own insistence that she would destroy the
coal industry and put them out of business, which we’ve seen come to fruition
under Obama and his closing of numerous coal production companies via the “fundamental
transformation of America” he promised, this time by reducing carbon devils like
coal, which provides the majority of our nation’s electric power.

Hillary stated that “In America, if you can dream it you
should be able to build it”, except that Obama’s “you didn’t build that” quote
along with the mountains of EPA regulations his administration issues, often won’t
allow the building and expansion of a business, and frequently even prevents private
individuals from building on their own personal residential property.

Hillary also produced a list of things she wants to do
quickly in her administration, so with this expression of urgency she must be
criticizing the Obama administration for a lack of attention to the items on
her list, but she seemed to only adore Obama as she hugged him on Wednesday
night, so I wonder how seriously she considers these urgent matters that she
didn’t get them addressed while she was a part of the Obama administration. If
these things were so important and people were suffering so badly, why wait?

Hillary also said she would address the subject of job
creation early in her administration, even though all Democrats pretend that
unemployment is at an all-time low. I couldn’t help but wonder how the federal
government was going to create jobs for the nation. Will she reduce the cost of
doing business by backing off of the punitive regulations in Obamacare? Will
she tell the EPA to stop issuing anti-business regulations that stifle job
creation and expansion? Will she lower taxes on individuals and corporations? I
believe the answer to all of the above is “no”. She’ll likely edict a large nation-wide
minimum pay increase, take credit for helping middleclass America keep up with
an increasingly expensive world, and walk away leaving millions of Americans still
unemployed.

And how about the cost of college loans, which industry
the government took over years ago and has only made worse due to a lack of
competition? Will Hillary put pressure on colleges to reduce the already high
and increasing salaries of professors, and themselves become leaner, reduce their
budgets and become more efficient so they can lower tuition costs and help
students reduce the debt they carry for years after graduation? Hell no! Government
will tax all Americans more heavily, even those without college-bound children,
to provide the “free” college Bernie was so fond of, and in the process make
the situation even worse. Liberal Democrats never solve any problem, they only
make the existing problem worse.

Hillary’s health, as well as her in-your-face dishonesty,
is also an issue in this election, and her repeated grunts and growls
throughout her speech as she constantly cleared her throat is concerning for
anyone who recalls her lengthy coughing fits in the recent past.

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

Last night the forty-second president of the United
States, the mouth-breathing, pan-faced Bill Clinton, made a speech at the
Democrat National Convention to “introduce” Hillary to America, as if we don’t
already know this law-breaking, criminal, lying woman. But among the first words
Clinton spoke to introduce his wife were: “I met a girl”. He was, of course,
referring to Hillary with these words, but could also have been speaking about
Monica, Jennifer, Paula, Juanita or numerous other women we know nothing about,
including the 26 trips he took on the “Lolita Express” aircraft owned by
convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and offering, instead of coffee or tea,
massages by under-aged “sex slaves”.

Yes, the girls thing has been Clinton’s weak spot and
I kept expecting him to make additional references to other women throughout
the speech in order to give us a full accounting of his lady friends. Maybe it’s
just me being ultra-critical of the Clinton crap and the slavish worship of
this pair of hypocrites by their foolish Democrat followers, but he and his
staff must have seen where his “I met a girl” statement would lead to in many
minds while listening to the speech.

Then at the end of the speech he assured us that every
situation Hillary becomes involved with turns out better than when it began,
but I guess Benghazi and the deaths of four Americans just slipped his mind.
And maybe he forgot about the Muslim brotherhood taking control in Egypt; and
what happened to Libya when Gaddafi was deposed; and the claim that Syria’s al-Assad
was a reformer; and he forget about the Russian reset button, all things that
got much worse for America and the world with Hillary in charge as Secretary of
State. Hillary Clinton is a truly bad person and everyone should be aware of
that fact by this late date.

During his speech Clinton listed a series of things
Hillary did that he claimed helped people, and I know that in each case her
so-called accomplishments was another big government intrusion into the lives
of Americans that deprives us of another block of our constitutionally provided
liberties.

Occasionally during the speech the camera in the
convention hall swung to the Clinton’s grinning daughter, Chelsea, the
white-liberal-privileged woman who lives in a ten million dollar penthouse in
Manhattan and is married to one of Hillary’s hated and despised financial
company moguls, which shows how serious Hillary is about the promises she has
made to destroy Wall Street insiders and their cheating companies.

We need to also be made aware that, amidst the
cheering and lies, the DNC forgot the police officers who are being murdered at
an astounding rate throughout the nation, while celebrating the dead black
criminals shot by police in the line of duty. And we should also notice that
the American flag was an endangered species at the convention, as the
anti-American Democrats/liberals/progressives spoke and cheered in anticipation
of taking control of America as this great nation goes down for the third and
final time, drowning in government regulations, illegal immigration and
unconstitutional executive orders.

Tuesday, July 19, 2016

Last night an immigrant woman, to whom English is a
second or third language, gave what was broadly acclaimed to be a great speech,
and because a phrase or two, or perhaps only a few words, were similar to the
words spoken by a native-American Democrat woman a few years ago, the liberal
press claims these words, which, to repeat, are foreign words to the immigrant woman,
to be their own words and forbid that they be spoken by anyone else.

But imagine how this young, immigrant woman feels when
Democrats criticize her for perhaps mispronouncing some of the words or placing
an emphasis in the wrong part of the sentence. This poor woman, who dared to
try to speak English in public at the Republican National Convention, must be devastated
at this criticism from the liberal/progressive political left.

The immigrant woman’s name is Melania Trump and the
speech she is accused of quoting from was supposedly made by Michelle Obama
some years ago, long before this immigrant woman with the last name of Trump would
have or could have heard or read Michelle’s speech. This is such set-up deal
and is so beneath Democrats (well, maybe not beneath them) that I hope Melania
blows it off to be phony bunch of crap that one can expect to come from
liberals when they are being beaten in the area of public opinion and need a
target to shoot at in order to deflect attention from the own Crooked Hillary.

But it’s such a shame that an immigrant should have to
take such abuse from rich American liberals, but of course she’s a legal
immigrant, and therein lies the difference in the way they treat her. Maybe the
liberal press has forgotten about the speech that Joe Biden plagiarized a few
years ago, and a phrase Barack Obama lifted in a speech he made during his
administration. I wonder who Michelle stole her speech from in the first place.
After all, it’s a liberal tradition.

It’s a scandal that someone who has chosen to become
an American citizen and has achieved success here is abused by Democrats who
only want to admit illegal immigrants who will accept dependence from
big Democrat government and will vote to keep big brother liberals in power in
exchange for the tax-payer provided goodies they receive.

The American people are fed up with Obama’s placing blame
for shootings on privately owned guns and on police officers; they’re fed up
with terrorists committing attacks at will; they’re fed up with a president
performing illegal and unconstitutional acts in order to achieve his unpopular,
leftist goals of “fundamentally transforming America”; they’re fed up with a
Democrat presidential candidate committing crimes as Secretary of State, as
clearly defined by the FBI director, James Comey, but getting no punishment at
all from the Department of Justice for those crimes; but on the other hand Americans
are eating up the Republican convention which follows on the heels of the
murders of six Baton Rouge police officers. Americans see a stark difference
between the leftist, blame-America-first Democrats and the patriotic,
law-abiding Republicans.

The Republicans under Donald Trump have promised to
right all of these and other wrongs imposed on us by Obama and Clinton during
the last seven years, and have promised they will seek out and kill ISIS terrorists
and not sit back and wait for them to attack another American city.

The idiocy of Obama allowing and promoting all of the
evils that have occurred during his administration is brought home with the
tragic killings of six more police officers the weekend before the Republicans
have their convention. The differences between the two parties could not be
more clearly delineated than they are this election season.

Sunday, July 17, 2016

Obama, just today, July 17, 2016, stated that “nothing
justifies violence against law enforcement”, referring to the police killings
we’ve seen this weekend in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. But our dear president has
forgotten his former position on a lesser matter regarding the police in Cambridge,
Massachusetts, and other police matters as well, when he stated that the police
responded “stupidly” to an event before he even knew what had happened.

Our president now also has taken the new attitude that
“we need to temper our words and open our hearts”, and “we need to avoid
divisive rhetoric” following the tragic events in Baton Rouge this weekend. It
appears our president suddenly realizes that his former racist, anti-police
statements were not only listened to by the rabble that would kill police officers,
but these thugs have taken his former excessive words as encouragement to move
forward with their shooting and killing, knowing that Obama would once again not
blame them, but would divert attention to the guns used in the murders as being
at fault. At least Obama, with his new-found soothing words, has finally
dropped the idiotic anti-gun and anti-police rhetoric that has always been his
fallback position, and is now taking the position of the great unifier and healer,
following the destructive words he’s spoken in the past. Why has it taken our
punk president so long to begin absorbing his on-the-job training and finally,
although probably temporarily, begun blaming the killers and not their guns?

Obama, while disrupting peoples’ lives as a community
organizer, could make grand denunciations of the police that he was aggravating
and protesting against in Chicago and his words would be heard by few people,
understood by fewer, and taken seriously by nearly no one. But as president his
words of criticism for the police have caused an enormous divide in America, which
has resulted in an open hunting season on police officers, based on Obama’s own
words, and it’s all on him.

Barack Obama had such a blessed opportunity to unify
the nation and bury racial animosity when a majority of Americans, black and
white alike, elected him president. And now, nearly eight years later, he’s
blown the chance to heal, based solely on his intention to “fundamentally
transform America” and has caused more racial divisiveness and violence than we’ve
ever seen before. This division and hate, I fear, is what modern-day
liberals/progressives/Democrats do, and I know it’s a practice that Hillary
will continue and expand upon if she’s elected president.

Friday, July 15, 2016

Liberals are running out of things on which to blame
the crap that’s happening in America. Hillary shoots off her mouth about how
terrible life is in America (education is bad; wages are low; the poor are
getting poorer while the rich, like Hillary, are getting richer; crime is
increasing; the nation is more divided than ever; race relations are bad; we
expect a new terror attack at any moment; joblessness is high and rising) and states
her idiotic plans to fix them and, oops!, we realize liberal Democrats, like
Hillary, have been in control of our nation’s policies and law enforcement for
the last seven years and gotten everything they wanted during the entire
duration of Obama’s presidency. So where’s the beef, and who’s to blame?

Race relations
have become increasingly testy, but surely this couldn’t be the fault of our liberal/Democrat/black
president of the last seven years, could it? And now we have another mass terrorist
killing, this one in Nice and, darn it, the weapon used was a truck. So now the
object of blame, used successfully for seven years under the leftist/liberal
Democrat administration of Barack Obama, the gun, can’t be blamed. Liberals are
running out of ways of trying to deflect blame and criticism from their worn-out,
ineffective policies, but don’t expect them to vacate their favorite source of
evil in the world (America), and don’t expect them to actually wage war on an
enemy that has sworn to kill us.

But doubly frustrating for Obama’s blame-America-first
crowd is their inability to blame ultra-liberal France, which has an enormous and
growing Muslim population, for the killings. So, in order to find a proper
culprit and blame the truck for the killings, will Obama now propose
legislation to specify engine-size, wheel-size, weight, height and horsepower
restrictions on trucks used throughout America in order to make them of less
use to terrorists? It makes as much sense as blaming the lump of metal that a
gun represents for the more traditional terrorist killings, and it prevents the
Obama administration from having to face the facts and call terror attacks the
fault of radical Islamic terrorists and Obama’s own pandering to the religion
of peace, and not waging all-out war on them in Syria and Iraq and Libya, where
they live, instead of in cities in America and France.

And on top of all our other troubles, Obama insists on
importing at least 50,000 Syrian “refugees” who can’t possibly be even
minimally vetted before entering our borders. Our nation is in deep, and
deepening, trouble with Obama/Hillary in the Oval Office.

Thursday, July 14, 2016

Just as the Clinton administration was accused of
being satisfied with a certain level of crime in the 1990s to bolster its case
in favor of unconstitutional gun-control measures, today it’s easy and logical
to assume that the Obama administration is not only comfortable with a moderate
terrorist threat level from the Syrian “refugees” they are encouraging to
settle in America, it appears obvious that they are encouraging this increased
threat of a terrorist attack. Similarly, a case can be made, based on empirical
evidence, that Obama can also tolerate an increased nuclear threat level on
America and Israel following his catastrophic Iran nuke deal.

The Syrian “refugee” situation is completely lacking
in logic and common sense. The State Department claims to be performing “comprehensive
and robust security screening”, per the Wall Street Journal, but a moment’s
reflection would make a sensible person aware that meaningful security checks
cannot be performed on citizens from nations like Syria, which has no
functioning local or national government, is in a state of total shambles, and
doesn’t much like the United States anyway. So why would they work with us and
warn us of potential threats to our security? And how can security checks be
made when the entire region is little more than a bomb crater? Then also
consider that the Obama administration is rumored to be using the United Nations
to make the actual security checks on each “refugee” entering America from
Syria, and we all know how fond of America the United Nations is. Letting them
be responsible for security in the United States does not give me a warm
feeling.

The subject of the Iran nuclear agreement is an even
more distressing area of consideration of Obama’s evil intent for America. The
Wall Street Journal reports that this year-old agreement has produced “illegal
proliferation of sensitive procurement activities by Iran in Germany” regarding
nuclear technology, and all of these dealings by Iran “violate Iran’s explicit commitment
to go through an official procurement channel to purchase nuclear related
materials”. Meanwhile the Obama administration pretends that “Iran has met all
its obligations under the deal” and deserves additional weakening of the
sanctions against the terrorist state.

Obama honestly and openly claimed to want to “fundamentally
transform America”, but it’s also clear that he is not completely uncomfortable
with a terrorist attack or a nuclear device being used on America, but has so
far left these sentiments unstated. After all, if a nuclear device were to be
detonated in an American city it would give Obama the excuse he needs to
declare martial law and lock us down absolutely and completely under his total
control. The constitution would be suspended immediately. There would be no
more elections, no more talk radio, no internet, no more interstate nor
international travel. We would be serfs
serving the leader in Washington.

Why does the United States deserve this fool man and
his evil intentions towards this great nation?

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

The devious, anti-America schemes of the Obama
administration have tentacles working undercover into every area of government
and American society, undermining our lives, our nation and our homes, in
keeping with Obama’s promise to “fundamentally transform America”.

Things in American life have only gotten incredibly
worse under Obama’s rule, and this downward trend will continue long after
Obama leaves office because he has imbedded the destructive, unconstitutional changes
into executive orders, law and department policy and bent the opinion of the
uninformed citizens among us to cause and permit this continuing destruction.

Obama proves that, no matter how bad things currently
are, they can always get worse, and have done so each moment of his
administration. The election of Hillary to the presidency would only further tilt
the downward angle of this slippery slope, and our nation’s decline would occur
more rapidly than is currently happening with Crooked, Grossly Negligent
Hillary in the Oval Office.

Barack Obama sees racism when a police officer, whether
black or white, acting in the line of duty, tragically shoots and kills a black
suspect, and he reaches this conclusion long before there is any investigation
into the actual facts of the event, but he claims he can’t determine the reason
for a black man’s expressed, racist, hate-filled desire to kill white people
and police officers, after this man does, indeed, kill five white police officers
in Dallas. Mr. Obama is blind to clear evidence of hate and race-mongering. Our
president almost appears delusional on this subject and the related anti-gun
rant that he seems to revert to each time a terrorist or an insane, hate-filled
person shoots innocent people.

Given the nonsense that comes out of the Obama
administration and its inability to see racism clearly and call it what it is,
it’s obvious that Obama’s judgement is out of sync with reality and that he is
unfit for his position. His prejudice prevents him seeing true racism when it
raises its ugly head, but imagines racism at the slightest provocation where it
doesn’t exist at all, except in his America-hating mind.

Monday, July 11, 2016

Let’s first review only Obama’s timeliness in judging his
accuracy and wisdom when making statements about events important to our lives:

First, he called ISIS a “JV” team just prior to its
becoming a major international killing force threatening the world.

Second, he declared that he had “contained” ISIS the
day before the November 13, 2015, attack on Paris, and just prior to the San
Bernardino terrorist attack in California.

Third, he declared the police killings of black
suspects in Louisiana and Minnesota as racist killings just prior to the mass attacks
on police officers in Dallas, Texas, at a Black Lives Matter gathering. And
these examples are only proof of Obama’s bad timing in shooting off his mouth
about critical events; we haven’t ever gotten to the subject of his accuracy
and intent yet.

It’s clear that when Obama announces a judgement on something,
if all he is trying to do is put citizens’ minds at peace about the threat, then
he’s a complete failure and a counter force to peace. But add to this infinite fallibility
his bad intentions and his dislike of Americans and the American way of life under
our constitution, and you have a disaster in the making with such a president.

Any leader who claims he is going to “fundamentally transform”
the entity he is leading will not do the job that most people under his rule
want done by their leader. So when Obama promised he would “fundamentally transform
America” during his administration, those citizens who paid attention to his
words expected nothing but disaster from an Obama administration. And that’s
exactly what we got. The current disaster is racial divide, and this is the one
area where Obama, the community organizer and professional agitator, is right
at home and needs no advice from his leftist staff as to how best to divide the
nation.

When a police officer shoots a young black man in the
line of duty Obama immediately assumes, and openly proclaims to the public,
that it was the officer’s fault due to his racism, even though the deaths of
most young black men are at the hands of other young black men, not police
officers. Obama rules out the possibility that the police officer was justified
in using violence against the suspect. Our president forgets that decent black
Americans depend on police officers to protect them from young black men who
commit crimes, and whose crimes are way out of proportion to their percentage
of the American population. So when he dumps accusations of racism on police,
he hurts the decent black citizens who depend on these officers for protection
from the young men Obama defends, at great cost to America’s police officers
and law-abiding black citizens of America.

In addition, leftists like Obama never look inward to
themselves and their policies as being culpable for rising crime rates and
terrorist attacks. The Democrats have established their future voting block and
re-election efforts on poor people, disproportionately black under the Obama
administration, whose population is also disproportionately unemployed and
poorly educated with no fathers in the home and whose mothers are swamped with
too many welfare children to raise alone on a barely existent welfare budget
and living in crime-ridden areas.

And what is Obama’s idea to help welfare recipients?
He wants their sub-standard buildings constructed in traditionally middle-class
neighborhoods, not to help the welfare recipients, but to stick a finger in the
eye of hard-working, middle class Americans, destroy the value of their homes
and make them subject to living in high crime neighborhoods. Every program and
policy of the Obama administration, and liberal policy in general, only make
matters worse and lessens the quality of life for all Americans.

The current dangerous racial/police situation can be
placed right at the feet of Barack Obama, because he will never encourage people
to withhold judgement on police shootings until after all of the facts are in
and we know exactly what happened. Even when his own Justice Department cleared
the police officer of any wrong-doing in the Ferguson death of a young black
man who attacked the police officer, Obama lets the lie of “hands up, don’t
shoot” and “black lives matter” go unchallenged and he makes no attempt to calm
those who believe the police were at fault, but instead he agitates and makes
harsh, untruthful and inflammatory charges against the police, and more people
die as a result, this time Dallas police officers.

And we should also recall that the trials in Baltimore
that accused police officers, both black and white, of causing the death of a
young black criminal, have found the police officers to be not guilty. So it’s
not only Obama who is stirring up racial feelings and causing trouble in
America, it’s all liberal/leftist/Democrats who are destroying the lives of
Americans for their own political advantage.

Then add to this mess the fact that Obama is pushing
to nationalize all local police departments and place them under his personal command,
and we’ve got even greater problems ahead if a big-government Democrat like
Hillary Clinton becomes our next president and continues Obama’s destructive, unconstitutional
and totalitarian policies.

Recall if you will for a moment, President Obama repeatedly
lecturing Americans that calling ISIS terrorists “Radical Islamic Terrorists”
would offend Muslims and would cause them to become recruits to the murderous
ISIS forces, while at the same time we heard our president repeatedly brag about
his personal bravery and leadership in giving the order to kill Osama Bin Laden.
I also recall the fool Joe Biden making the braggadocios statement that under
the leadership of Barack Obama, Bin Laden was dead and General Motors was still
alive. So what would make border-line terrorists angrier: calling terrorists
what they are (terrorists), or assassinating their leader?

It always confused me when Obama claimed that words
encouraged radicals to kill, but killing Osama Bin Laden had no impact on them
at all. So now we get the report from England’s Daily Mail that Bin Laden’s son wants revenge, not for words spoken
about terrorists that he finds offensive, but for Barack Obama’s order to assassinate
his father, and he wants more attacks on America as a result.

There is none so stupid, nor so dangerous to this
nation, as a leftist, America-hating president and his big mouth. Obama had an
opportunity long ago to fulfill his red-line promise in Syria and halt the
spread of ISIS, and he turned tail and ran from his responsibility. Obama is a liar
and a coward who punishes and repeatedly criticizes his own nation for living
freely and comfortably, but refuses to punish bands of stone-age terrorists who
are killing and raping their way around the world.

Saturday, July 9, 2016

Democrats have always been money-grubbers, but as long
as they were being outspent by Republicans in elections they pretended to hate
the cost of campaigning and proclaimed that they wanted to get money out of
politics, or better yet, go to a government-subsidized financing system. But
the rant against Republicans for raising and spending too much money for
elections came to a halt recently when Hillary announced that her campaign had accumulated
more money than Donald Trump, who is self-financing his campaign for president,
and she suddenly began bragging about having more money than Trump, and
expressing pride in this formerly despised accomplishment. At this mid-stream
attitude-change, Hillary suddenly became proud of the larger pile of cash and
the larger expenditures of money her staff was able to make to buy ads and
spend money on campaign events. All at once money was a good thing and no
longer a problem that undermined a fair election season and an open democracy, such
as America has.

On a different money-related, government issue,
Democrats are belly-aching loudly about the Republicans spending seven million
dollars on their Benghazi investigation in an attempt to determine Hillary’s
culpability in the attacks and the deaths of the four Americans that reported
to her. But then we learn of the Democrats wasting eight million dollars on the
lie of global warming, all of which is completely political and an attempt to
gain more control over the lives of Americans and get a lock on controlling the
economy to favor Democrat demographics and policy. So when the subject is
really an attempt to punish a wrong-doer and make government more open and
honest Democrats aren’t interested. But when
it’s pure politics and the promotion of lies and deceit, Dems are fully
on-board.

One wonders if Democrats have any honest principles at
all or are they interested only in blaming opponents for doing what they
themselves, as Democrats, do. Or are they solely and only interested in winning
elections and getting control of government and the nation’s wealth?

Friday, July 8, 2016

The idiot in the Oval Office, who loves to play at
being the president of the United States, is finally seeing his promise of a “fundamental
transformation of America” come to fruition with the mass killing of police
officers in Dallas. We’ve been watching this fool man’s policies cause
increasing misery and suffering as the border is left wide open for illegals to
enter; sanctuary cities protect criminals who should not be here; ISIS is
ignored and called a JV team while killing hundreds of innocent people; Obama
pretends war on Syrian ISIS encampments but does very little to actually
eliminate them; he withdraws from Iraq and loses a war already won; he makes a
nuclear deal with Iran that assures the Mullahs will obtain a nuclear device in
a few years; he accuses the police in American cities of causing racial
problems and criminal activity; and now the police are being attacked in full
military style on the streets of America.

Now we see the latest realization of Obama’s words and
policies with the killing of many police officers in Dallas, Texas, which indicates
to me that the terrorism that Obama promised was “contained” in Syria is indeed
alive and well in the United States, and it was brought here and allowed to
grow by Barack Obama and his far left Democrat party. In just over seven years Obama has indeed
transformed America from a prosperous, free nation to one that is looking more
third-world all the time and finds that any of its citizens expressing doubt
about global warming are threatened with prosecution for their words and ideas,
and has legal, law-abiding gun-owners facing unconstitutional confiscation of
those weapons.

So it had better register with the citizens of America
that leftist policy will destroy this nation just as it has destroyed all
nations that have tried it in the past, most recently Venezuela, and that Obama’s
hand-picked successor to the presidency, the “totally qualified” Hillary
Clinton, will only make things worse and drive us more quickly to total devastation,
domestic terrorism and poverty, if that fool woman is elected in November.

Let this be a lesson to Obama’s followers, that when
you proceed to “fundamentally transform” a nation you necessarily weaken its
institutions and cause it eternal destruction as unforeseen elements enter the
weakened fabric and expand the “transformation” in unintended ways. With all of
the unconstitutional and illegal ways Obama has personally attacked America, and
with his intentionally racially divisive language, all of this destruction and
the killings are on his head, and it would not surprise one at all to learn
that the opening of our borders to all who will illegally enter might not have been
a contributing factor to this latest killing spree.

Thursday, July 7, 2016

Liberals make a lot of noise about “white privilege”
in America, but when it comes to liberal political privilege the white population
can’t begin to keep up. Just ask Republicans like Scooter Libby and Bob
McDonnell how they were treated by the liberals that persecuted and prosecuted
them with very little or no evidence of wrong-doing.

The true scandal of Hillary being allowed to avoid
prosecution is that the FBI Director, James Comey, in the televised statement in
which he officially announced that the Department of Justice was dropping their
investigation of Hillary, spent ten minutes carefully and fully listing her
transgressions and announcing that she was grossly negligent with the way she
handled her email servers and secure messaging, then said “never mind” to
paying any penalty for these crimes. Any one of the numerous crimes that Comey
listed would get a normal person sent to prison, but not anyone associated with
Barack Obama and liberals in government. After all, what’s the purpose of being
a liberal if you have to respect and obey the law?

Some of the liberals who have been forgiven for committing
crimes like not paying taxes and lying under oath to a federal judge are
Charles Rangel and Bill Clinton. And don’t forget that Barack Obama got favored
treatment under the law when the Supreme Court illegally rewrote Obamacare,
from the bench, so it could remain in place as the law that nationalized
healthcare in America.

America is being ruled by swine and if this practice
does not end with a course-correcting vote this November we may not be able to
continue on our nation’s traditional course of liberty and freedom.

Wednesday, July 6, 2016

The Movie “2001:
A Space Odyssey” was on TV recently and it was noticeable in this odd
political season of 2016, the close relationship between what the two humans on
the space craft experienced compared with what HAL, the computer interface system,
was telling them about what they saw and heard taking place during their voyage,
and how these events can be compared with actions of the Obama administration.

The humans saw what they thought was a computer error
occurring, but HAL, the computer’s human input/output communications system,
insisted that the 9000 Series Computer had never made a mistake and never had
an error. This sounded strangely like the Obama administration stating that it
will be the most transparent administration the nation has ever had, and then we
learn of them making secret nuclear deals with the Iranian Mullahs; opening up
our borders to all who want to illegally enter, while simultaneously claiming
that more illegal border crossers had been sent back home than ever before;
getting an American agent killed with their Fast and Furious scheme which
attempted to blame our constitution for deaths with rifles that were legally sold
in America; promising Obamacare would allow all Americans to keep their plan,
keep their doctor, and would save them $2500 a year; and other underhanded if
not illegal acts committed by the current administration.

HAL then kills one of the astronauts and insults the intelligence
of the surviving crew member by claiming that it could not determine what
caused his death due to lack of sufficient data on the subject. Sounds kind of
like a multi-pronged, multi-month FBI investigation into Hillary’s time as Secretary
of State being ended by the Obama administration with a claimed lack of proof
that she did anything wrong.

If we can for one minute associate HAL with our big, bloated
government which claims perfection in all things yet makes one decision after another
that either limits the liberties of American citizens or gets patriotic
Americans killed, there is a lesson to learn from this movie. The HALs of the
world, in this instance, the Obama administration and its enormous and
intrusive government, have forgotten that the mission of the United States is
liberty and freedom and not the leftist, freakish desires of the Obama
administration. They are subverting the mission defined by the constitution and
in the process they are destroying the nation. Presidential administrations are
supposed to maintain the nation as founded, not change or destroy it.

The FBI has been investigating Hillary for months on
suspicion of money and influence peddling and government security violations
while she was Secretary of State, but HAL/Obama tells us he doesn’t believe any
security violations were committed; Bill Clinton meets secretly with Obama’s
Attorney General (Loretta Lynch) at an airport in Phoenix; then Mrs. Lynch
announces, in a carefully worded statement, that she is prepared to accept the
advice of the FBI director as to the next step to take on Hillary’s email
investigation; then Hillary states that, if elected president, she will retain Mrs.
Lynch as her Attorney General; then James Comey, the Director of the FBI,
forgives Hillary and halts the investigation, but only after properly listing
each of the crimes the investigation found she was guilty of and finally labels
her as being Grossly Negligent.

HAL in the form of Obama is trying to take over your
life and the lives of future American citizens, and time has almost run out to
save ourselves and our nation from a president who swore to “fundamentally
transform America”, and he’s almost completed his sinister task.

Tuesday, July 5, 2016

If Donald Trump doesn’t start using “Grossly Negligent”
in addition to his “Crooked” descriptor of Hillary, he’ll be missing a strong
point to be used against her and will be passing up a ripe target that the DOJ itself
has placed on her chest.

When the Department of Justice representative, in this
case James Comey, the Director of the FBI, describes a presidential candidate that
has undergone deep, extensive investigation as being “Grossly Negligent”, he
has hung her politically in the eyes of any citizen paying attention to current
events. In an age of constant and increasing terrorist attacks on America, who
in their right mind would want a “Grossly Negligent” president?

Hillary as president would be the final nail in the
coffin of America, and every tool must be used to block her election.

Friday, July 1, 2016

The slick-meister is at it again, but this time his
pants were up and buckled. Bill Clinton, whose wife, Hillary, the current Democrat
heir-apparent to the Oval Office, is not only a candidate for president but is
up to her eyeballs in more than one FBI investigation for email usage and
security violations as Secretary of State in the Obama administration, had a
private thirty-minute meeting at the obscure location on the tarmac of Sky
Harbor airport in Phoenix, with Loretta Lynch, the current Attorney General in
the Obama administration and the boss of the FBI investigators who will decide
the fate of Hillary Clinton. Who can question the wisdom and appearance of this
meeting? But it’s typical Democrat operating procedure.

There’s probably no relation at all, but the same day that
Bill and Loretta met it was disclosed that the State Department requested a two-year
delay of release of Hillary’s emails related to the Clinton Foundation. This
means that Hillary’s dishing our promises to foreign rulers in exchange for a
donation to her alleged “charity” will not be known until she is half-way
through her first term as president, at which time she can just have the emails
buried and forgotten forever.

So let’s review the chronology: Hillary is being investigated
by the FBI; her husband meets privately with the Attorney General; foundation
emails will be covered up; the Attorney will someday soon decide whether to
place Hillary on trial of just slap her wrists for putting the nation at risk
by exposing national secrets to any hacker who wants to invade her unsecure system.

Although Bill had his pants up this time, both he a
Loretta Lynch let their guards down and have created a large storm about their
honesty and professional behavior. Bill is just Bill and will always be a fool,
but Loretta must be impeached and removed from her job and have no
decision-making input on how to proceed with Hillary and her tribulations.

Our esteemed president, in his pretense of wanting to
protect America and the citizens of this great nation, encourages us to raise
the alarm and if we see something, we are encouraged to say something. So I
will.

I see an administration that despises America.

I see a president who wants to “fundamentally
transform America” to something unrecognizable.

I see an Attorney General who has private meetings
with the husband of a women currently being investigated by the FBI.

I see Syrian “refugees” invading America with sworn
terrorists in their midst.

I see a president who lied about our doctor, our plan,
and saving $2500 a year with Obamacare.

I see a president who in effect has given the go-ahead
for Iran to build a nuclear weapon.

I see a president who cares more about LGBT bathrooms
than he does about giving our children good educations or protecting America
from terrorist attacks.

I see a nation being overrun by illegal aliens who don’t
want to become functioning citizens but are after short-term goodies only.

There I’ve done it. I’ve stated what I’ve seen after
seven years of watching Obama operate, and what the hell good will it do with
people in elected office, and this reference includes the fool Republicans in
the House and Senate as well as the Oval Office, who are only concerned about
their continued political careers and eventually drifting into a lucrative
lobbying position, and don’t give a damn about the welfare of America and its
citizens.

So what good does it do to say something when
officials will not listen? One might as well stick one’s head in the sand and
remain silent because the current administration in intentionally walking us to
national destruction and will not be diverted from that goal.

It’s long been assumed that evolution caused monkeys
and apes to have evolved into humans. Evolution is religiously believed mainly
by the anti-religious left. And especially in the evolution of lesser species
to more advanced species, the left has always believed that the evolution was
from monkeys to humans and not the other way around. But what if evolution is
actually from human to monkeys? This would blow up liberal theories of
evolution and the assumption that humans are of a higher order. It would seem
to be more in agreement with liberal thinking, and is in agreement with their
disbelief in a God, that liberals would prefer the theory that apes are
superior to humans because apes are more “natural” and more closely attuned to
nature.

Conservatives, on the other hand, assume that God is supreme
in the universe and that humans were created in the image of God, so humans occupy
that place or state that all lesser beings evolve to. Could this assumption be
incorrect? This position, if it is
correct, doesn’t weaken the idea that the logical-thinking, concept creating
humans are at the top of the food chain, but it may be that the idea of
evolving “up” is a mistaken idea that should be reconsidered, especially since
the wealth and liberty-loving United States, which would seem to be at the top
of the international community pecking order, is being systematically dismantled
by liberals, and our nation seems to be in a free-fall toward second- or
third-world status at the hands of the Obama administration and the big-government
liberals currently ruling our nation. The thinking that would cause this fall
from grace, and it’s all liberal in its intellectual source, can’t come from a
higher-order brain, so it appears that liberals must be a sub-species of humans
who have devolved from full human membership to the lesser status of liberalism.

As a partial justification for entry into war with
Iraq, President Bush spoke often about all peoples’ desire to be free and
prosperous and to live happily in a democracy, but America’s leading anti-constitution
soldiers, Obama and Hillary, are taking America in the opposite direction of
freedom and liberty, so why shouldn’t Mother Nature and evolution descend in a
similar direction?

Given the current political climate in the United
States, and around the world as well, freedom, prosperity and independence of
thought don’t seem to be held in great reverence by many people, and it appears
that the United States is evolving “down”, and it’s a certainly that if this
nation dies, all of human-kind will die with it as terrorism and mob rule will
become dominant, and that’s not what one would consider to be evolution
in the “upward” direction.

Liberals distrust independent, self-sufficient people who
don’t depend on the government to make a life for themselves, and want these
peoples’ independence limited. Gun owners are relatively independent from the authorities
for self-defense so their guns must be taken from them in order to limit their
independence. In addition, guns are dirty, oily and loud, so these yucky things
must be confiscated, according to the liberal smart-set. Liberals are just
generally distrustful of all people who are free and independent of
big-government, so these free-spirited gun-owning people must be brought under
control.

Of course, there are those totalitarian leftists who
want guns taken from all Americans because being gunless is being defenseless
and at the mercy of those possessing guns, an example of which is when the Hitlerian
left decides it’s time to stomp out all liberties under the constitution and
place a yoke around the neck of America. It’s simply a matter of practicality
and convenience for leftists to get rid of any real resistance to their
ultimate plans.

But most liberals want guns removed from the populace
because only then will they consider themselves to be as cool as the French,
British and Germans who don’t have guns, and they’ll feel like equals when mixing
with these gun-deprived foreigners. After all, it must be hard for leftist
Americans to put up with having the terms “cowboy” and “gun-slinger” cast at
them by an EU member while trying to dine on the Champs-Elysees or on the upper east side in New York. This is the
symbolism referred to in the title above, and it dominates leftist awareness of
the world.

Whether to make American leftists feel more comfortable
around Europeans or to limit armed resistance to a martial law take-over of a
city, state or the entire nation, liberals wish to remove our constitution from
the list of documents that assure America’s liberties and rights. Either way,
liberal/Democrat/progressive/leftists are a danger to liberty in America.