UKRAINE - People are deceived by the U.S. / EU - Nazis and fascists in control of government, formed by US and EU. - In this blog, I will provide the information that the Western press is not willing to give. The purpose is to open the eyes of the Norwegian, European and Ukrainian people about what actually happens in Ukraine, and who’s behind. Some text is mine, but also from friends or I borrow/ bring in from other media

tirsdag 10. april 2018

Tucker Carlson asks: ‘Would war against Assad make the US safer?’

While 99.9% of the war hungry mainstream media, left and right, is united in their push for a war with Syria, based on a false flag chemical weapons attack, Fox News’ Tucker Carlson is challenging the logic and reasoning behind the imminent Trump attack on Syria.

Here is the complete segment from The Liberty Hound YouTube channel, complete with Tucker’s stunning opening segment, where he exposes all the lies behind the current build up towards war with Syria.

Carlson then interviews Senator Roger Wicker (R-MS), who fails to explain why a war with Syria is in American national interest.

Wicker does state that a war with Syria is in Israel’s national
interest, but cannot elaborate on why attacking Assad without evidence,
or a proper investigation is to the benefit of America.

And just in case the full segment from The Liberty Hound’s YouTube
channel gets taken down by Google, here is the Fox News’ channel YouTube
video of Carlson’s opening statement on Syria.No comment is needed, just watch and please share!

In Tucker’s final segment on Syria, a former American hostage weighs
in on the chemical hoax propagated by the Trump administration and all
the mainstream media.

Theo Padnos spent two years
as the hostage of al-Nusra, a Syrian Islamist rebel group. Padnos makes
some excellent points, but the fact that its difficult for an
investigative team to verify claims of an attack may actually be what is
driving the Trump administration’s rush to bomb the area under
question.

Watch the video and then read below The Duran’s explanation of events unfolding, and
how Russia’s control of Douma, and its ability to now conduct a full
investigation into yet another Deep State false flag, is prompting the
US to bomb Syria as soon as possible.

As a result of the total surrender of the Jihadis
previously in control of Douma on Sunday, it is the Russian military who
this time are in control of the alleged crime scene.This has put the
Russians in a position where for the first time they are able both to
invite the OPCW inspectors to attend the crime scene and to provide them
with protection if they are there, whilst at the same time monitoring
and supervising their work.

If the chemical attack on Douma really is fictitious – as the
Russians insist it is – then for the first time their control of the
crime scene puts the Russians in a strong position to prove it.

The point was made forcefully by Russia’s UN ambassador Vassily
Nebenzia at the UN Security Council session today, and it also received
indirect backing from the UN Secretariat, who admitted that they could
not confirm that a chemical weapons attack had happened, and who called
upon all sides to show restraint until a proper investigation of the
incident had taken place.

Nebenzia followed this up by inviting OPCW inspectors to the scene as early as tomorrow Tuesday.

By now it should surprise no-one that the fact that the
Russians are in control of the crime scene and may on this occasion be
able to prove conclusively that no chemical weapons attack happened in
Douma, instead of deterring a US attack, is actually making it more
likely.

This is because the credibility of the various ‘witnesses’ to the
Douma attack – who are of course the same witnesses who were previously
‘witnesses’ to the 2013 East Ghouta and the 2017 Khan Sheikhoun attacks –
is now on the line, as is the credibility of those Western governments –
first and foremost the US government – who believed or who pretended to
believe them.

I would add that not only is the credibility of the US
government and of other Western governments on the line. So is the
credibility of Western journalists who also believed or pretended to
believe the ‘witnesses’.