Tuesday, 13 August 2013

"Vedic Mathematics" by Ajit Mishra's Online Classroom

The religious texts of the Vedic Period provide evidence for the use of large numbers. By the time of the Yajurvedasaṃhitā- (1200–900 BCE), numbers as high as 1012 were being included in the texts. For example, the mantra (sacrificial formula) at the end of the annahoma ("food-oblation rite") performed during the aśvamedha, and uttered just before-, during-, and just after sunrise, invokes powers of ten from a hundred to a trillion:

"Hail to śata ("hundred," 102), hail to sahasra ("thousand," 103), hail to ayuta ("ten thousand," 104), hail to niyuta ("hundred thousand," 105), hail to prayuta ("million," 106), hail to arbuda ("ten million," 107), hail to nyarbuda ("hundred million," 108), hail to samudra ("billion," 109, literally "ocean"), hail to madhya ("ten billion," 1010, literally "middle"), hail to anta ("hundred billion," 1011,lit., "end"), hail to parārdha ("one trillion," 1012 lit., "beyond parts"), hail to the dawn (us'as), hail to the twilight (vyuṣṭi), hail to the one which is going to rise (udeṣyat), hail to the one which is rising (udyat), hail to the one which has just risen (udita), hail to svarga (the heaven), hail to martya (the world), hail to all."

The Satapatha Brahmana (ca. 7th century BCE) contains rules for ritual geometric constructions that are similar to the Sulba Sutras.

The Śulba Sūtras (literally, "Aphorisms of the Chords" in Vedic Sanskrit) (c. 700–400 BCE) list rules for the construction of sacrificial fire altars. Most mathematical problems considered in the Śulba Sūtras spring from "a single theological requirement,"
that of constructing fire altars which have different shapes but occupy
the same area. The altars were required to be constructed of five
layers of burnt brick, with the further condition that each layer
consist of 200 bricks and that no two adjacent layers have congruent
arrangements of bricks.
According to (Hayashi 2005, p. 363), the Śulba Sūtras contain "the earliest extant verbal expression of the Pythagorean Theorem in the world, although it had already been known to the Old Babylonians."

The diagonal rope (akṣṇayā-rajju) of an oblong (rectangle) produces both which the flank (pārśvamāni) and the horizontal (tiryaṇmānī) <ropes> produce separately.

Since the statement is a sūtra, it is necessarily compressed and what the ropes produce
is not elaborated on, but the context clearly implies the square areas
constructed on their lengths, and would have been explained so by the
teacher to the student.
They contain lists of Pythagorean triples, which are particular cases of Diophantine equations. They also contain statements (that with hindsight we know to be approximate) about squaring the circle and "circling the square."
Baudhayana (c. 8th century BCE) composed the Baudhayana Sulba Sutra, the best-known Sulba Sutra, which contains examples of simple Pythagorean triples, such as: (3, 4, 5), (5, 12, 13), (8, 15, 17), (7, 24, 25), and (12, 35, 37),
as well as a statement of the Pythagorean theorem for the sides of a
square: "The rope which is stretched across the diagonal of a square
produces an area double the size of the original square."
It also contains the general statement of the Pythagorean theorem (for
the sides of a rectangle): "The rope stretched along the length of the
diagonal of a rectangle makes an area which the vertical and horizontal
sides make together." Baudhayana gives a formula for the square root of two,

The formula is accurate up to five decimal places, the true value being 1.41421356...[31] This formula is similar in structure to the formula found on a Mesopotamian tablet from the Old Babylonian period (1900–1600 BCE):

which expresses √2 in the sexagesimal system, and which is also accurate up to 5 decimal places (after rounding).
According to mathematician S. G. Dani, the Babylonian cuneiform tablet Plimpton 322 written ca. 1850 BCE "contains fifteen Pythagorean triples with quite large entries, including (13500, 12709, 18541) which is a primitive triple,
indicating, in particular, that there was sophisticated understanding
on the topic" in Mesopotamia in 1850 BCE. "Since these tablets predate
the Sulbasutras period by several centuries, taking into account the
contextual appearance of some of the triples, it is reasonable to expect
that similar understanding would have been there in India. Dani goes on to say:

"As the main objective of the Sulvasutras was to describe the
constructions of altars and the geometric principles involved in them,
the subject of Pythagorean triples, even if it had been well understood
may still not have featured in the Sulvasutras. The occurrence of the triples in the Sulvasutras
is comparable to mathematics that one may encounter in an introductory
book on architecture or another similar applied area, and would not
correspond directly to the overall knowledge on the topic at that time.
Since, unfortunately, no other contemporaneous sources have been found
it may never be possible to settle this issue satisfactorily."

Search This Blog

About Me

Lifetime Chartered Member" of "The Chartered Institute of Logistics & Transport - India", New Delhi . I am working a Trainer, Tutor and Course Provider for Logistics and Supply Chain Management . Also provide counseling service to students and professionals regarding education, training and job in the field of Logistics and Supply Chain Management .