We have new books nearly every day.
If you would like a news letter once a week or once a month fill out this form and we will give you a summary of the books for that week or month by email.

﻿Title: Daily Training
Author: Benson, E. F. (Edward Frederic)
Language: English
As this book started as an ASCII text book there are no pictures available.
Copyright Status: Not copyrighted in the United States. If you live elsewhere check the laws of your country before downloading this ebook. See comments about copyright issues at end of book.
*** Start of this Doctrine Publishing Corporation Digital Book "Daily Training" ***
This book is indexed by ISYS Web Indexing system to allow the reader find any word or number within the document.
produced from images available at The Internet Archive)
_Daily Training_
BY
E. F. BENSON
[Illustration: text decoration] and [Illustration: text decoration]
EUSTACE H. MILES.
NEW YORK
E. P. DUTTON & CO.
31, West Twenty-Third Street
1903
[Illustration: colophon, K]
PRINTED BY
KELLY’S DIRECTORIES LTD.,
LONDON AND KINGSTON.
PREFACE.
The following pages contain certain rules and suggestions concerning
health, and certain simple and sensible ways in which it may, we hope,
be acquired and maintained at a very small expense of time and
self-denial, by a large number of people who are naturally accustomed to
feel not very well. The book is founded on notes made by its two authors
who, though they lead for the most part very different lives, are agreed
on certain broad principles of health herein set forth. One of them, for
instance, eats largely of flesh-foods every day, the other has scarcely
touched meat for years. But both are accustomed to feel extremely well
and to undertake considerable exertion either of mind or body without
experiencing any fatigue. One of them takes regular exercise, that is to
say he plays an out-door game on most days of his life, while the other
who abstains from flesh-foods has little practice of the sort. He will
take no out-of-door exercise for several days, work very hard, and find
himself perfectly fit for some severe physical test at the end. But they
are both agreed that if the one abandoned flesh-foods (which he does
not propose to do) he would cease to require regular exercise, and that
if the other took flesh-foods (which he does not propose to do) he would
not only be very ill, but would also require regular exercise. One again
is seldom seen without some appliance of tobacco in his mouth, because
he finds it agreeable and after an experiment of abstinence from it
found that it did not make any difference, as far as he could make out,
in his general health. The other never smokes at all. One again takes a
cold bath in the morning, the other a hot one followed by cold sponging.
But both are absolutely in accord on far more main points than those on
which their practice, at any rate, differs, and they have found it
perfectly easy to write this book together without wrangling, on which
account they wish to express a pious hope that the very fact that they
differ in so many things may have saved them from dogmatism. For it has
helped them to realize that even when they are agreed on any point it
would be a sheer stupidity to hint that they were therefore right, and
in consequence they only put forward the points on which they are agreed
as suggestions, hoping that others after trial may also agree with them.
For universal laws on an empirical matter like health are rare, and the
constitutions of men are various. One man’s meat, in fact, is literally
another man’s poison. But in the main the two authors are agreed. They
believe that the majority of mankind habitually eat too much and
habitually take too much stimulating food and drink. They believe also
that most people who do so do not take enough exercise, and that either
an increase of exercise or a decrease of stimulant is needed. They
believe that the best sorts of exercise are not those of slow pushing
movements such as are made in the use of dumb-bells, but full brisk
extended movements, with much use of the breathing apparatus and the
large muscle areas of the body. Similarly they are in accord as regards
present systems of training which tend to treat an entire crew or team
as if they were identical specimens, not as widely different specimens;
in every day life also they hold that because a certain mode of diet and
work suits A, it will not necessarily suit B and C, though B and C might
do worse than try it. They also regard the ordinary acceptation of the
word “Training” as far too narrow, and hold that to acquire a high
fitness of the body is a duty which should be within the reach of
everybody, since a mind housed in a fit body is far more capable of good
and sustained work than when its shell is imperfect. For this end they
advocate the starting of city athletic clubs like those in certain
American towns, being fully convinced that these clubs, with a
reasonable attention to matters of diet, would secure for the ordinary
city-worker a far higher measure of health than he is at present
accustomed to enjoy.
Finally, they believe that air, light and work (and here they do not
mind appearing dogmatic) are three prime remedies in the pharmacy of
God. And they feel sure that sensuality is bad for everybody.
_September, 1902._
CONTENTS.
CHAP. PAGE
I.--INTRODUCTORY 1
II.--FALLACIES AND DEFECTS IN PRESENT SYSTEMS OF TRAINING 27
III.--EXERCISE AND EXERCISES 62
IV.--DIET AND STIMULANTS 94
V.--WATER, HEAT AND LIGHT 130
VI.--AIR AND BREATHING 157
VII.--SLEEP, REST AND RELAXATION 186
VIII.--THE INFLUENCE OF TRAINING ON MIND AND MORALS 218
IX.--TRAINING FOR SPECIAL EVENTS 239
X.--REMEDIAL 263
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
Exercise II.--First Position _To face page_ 80
Exercise II.--Second Position 80
Exercise II.--Both Arms Together 80
Exercise VIII 81
Exercise IX.--First Position 82
Exercise IX.--Second Position 82
Exercise XIII.--First Position 83
Exercise XIII.--Second Position 83
Exercise XIV 84
DAILY TRAINING.
CHAPTER I.
INTRODUCTORY.
Among the many notable discoveries made by the Anglo-Saxon race during
the nineteenth century there is none more curious, none perhaps which
will turn out to have been more concerned with the well-being of the
race itself, than that which we may broadly call the discovery of
Athletics. In itself this discovery was natural enough, since the love
of sport, the pitting of the wit of man against animals, or against his
fellows, has always been strongly inherent among us; but after thirty
years of the new _régime_ we are apt to under-estimate the extraordinary
difference between the average middle-class Englishman of to-day, in the
matter of athletics, and the Englishman of the late sixties. For to put
it generally, games have been, if not invented, at any rate nationalized
since then; a large class of professional or semi-professional players
has come into existence, and an innumerable company of amateurs who play
games for their own sake, and for the sake of the increased measure of
health which most men find that they thereby enjoy. That this movement
at present is in the exuberance of its riotous juvenility, which coming
years will tame and quiet, is probable, but it is also probable that
with this modification will come a more scientific method of playing
games, which will convert the mere animal pleasure of using muscles and
lungs into a system which, by their fit and reasonable use, ensures for
their users not only a greatly increased power in mere strength and
agility, but a greatly increased power of mental quickness and moral
strength. The discipline, the quick obedience, the endurance which were
found to be necessary for the games in themselves, will be consciously
used in other ways and with objects vastly more important than mere
athletic excellence. In fact, the standing luck of the Anglo-Saxons is
here again typified: that which they began simply for purposes of
amusement, Nature is converting and will further convert into an
element, not only of physical, but of mental and moral pre-eminence.
Indeed, it was time that some new strain of growth, as it were, was
imported. For decades upon decades the country life of England had been
gradually drained out of the country altogether by colonization and
emigration, and by centralization into its towns; and the inevitable
health which waits upon those who live mainly in the open air, whose
diet is simple and wholesome foods, was being undermined by close
quarters, insufficient oxygen, and more than sufficient stimulants,
while those of the upper classes who still lived much in the country
hunted six days out of the seven, and drank seven nights out of the same
number. For the good old Englishman type, “one of the rare old sort,” as
it is the fashion to call it, cannot in the light of to-day be fairly
thought to be a very efficient or wholesome specimen. In fact, instead
of admiring the life which certain not very critical observers have told
us “made them what they were,” we ought rather to admire the wonderful
constitutions nature had given them, which did not sooner break up
under the extraordinarily unhealthy _régime_ of riding off every day
some of the excessive port wine consumed the evening before. No doubt
those works of fiction which admiringly record their feats make such a
class to appear to us larger and more wide-spread than it really was; it
is merely the admiration which we deprecate.
But by this wise provision of nature, simultaneously with the crowding
into towns (a feature, by the way, not of decadent but of increasing
national energy, and inevitable to successful competition), came this
new feature, the rise of athleticism, and the desire and necessity for
the health which athleticism both demands and, on the other hand, brings
with it. It is requisite, in order to excel at any game which demands
fleetness of foot, quickness of movement, accuracy of eye, to live,
broadly speaking, in a sober and rational manner. Drunken meteors have
reeled and will reel again over the athletic heavens, men who are built
in such iron mould that excess appears not to interfere with their
excellence, but on the one hand their brilliance is but short-lived, and
on the other they are in themselves exceptional; for we may say that the
average scratch player at golf, for instance, will certainly not remain
on that desirable mark for six months if he drinks a bottle of port
every night, and empties his box of cigarettes in two days. Thus
athleticism, on the whole, encourages among its million votaries a more
sensible and moderate way of life than they would, but for it, have
enjoyed, and by it they now, and their children in the future, will
inevitably be the fitter citizens. The green fields of England are
depopulated it is true, and a thicker and ever-spreading pall of smoke
rises above the clanking manufacturing towns and fog-ridden skies under
which the cities hum like swarming hives; but how on Saturday afternoons
are the fields populated again, and how the sand-pits crumble under the
illiterate strokes of delving stockbrokers, to whom at the moment the
little half-hidden ball is of more importance than the miles and
millions of the Rand or the salvation of their souls!
Nor is this movement confined to those who have the money and the
occasional leisure to play games. When before in the history of the
nation has there been such a phenomenon as the weekly crowds at Cup
ties, or the rapt lines of spectators at county cricket matches,
watching with the intensest interest the games they never play, and
knowing the athletic history of heroes they have never spoken to? That
the pleasure and excitement of betting enter into their enthusiasm is,
of course, undeniable, but we do not for a moment believe that this
accounts for all of it. There is something else as well, and that
something is the admiration and envy of the fitness of physical
excellence. Or when before was seen so curious a sight as the ordinary
bookstall groaning under magazines, the sole aim and purpose of which is
to teach their readers how to obtain physical strength? The “genial
broad-shouldered Englishman” of an earlier day was content to be
broad-shouldered; nowadays every one wants to know how the broad
shoulders are to be acquired. But the “genial broad-shouldered
Englishman” of an earlier day was subsequently content to recline
himself on a curtained feather-bed in a most microbeous room, with
windows shut; now we tear down our curtains, fling open our windows, and
plunge ourselves (without knowing why, it is true) into freezing baths
before we begin the work of the day.
To say that athletics are entirely responsible for the healthier way of
life pursued by the average Englishman of to-day as compared to the
average Englishman of forty years ago, would be of course an assertion
utterly beyond the mark. On the other hand, it is quite certainly within
the mark to say that athletics have appreciably contributed to it,
inasmuch as they both demand, as mentioned before, a sobriety and
moderation in life as an essential to continued success, and themselves
directly contribute to health as well as demanding the conditions that
are likely to lead to it. At the same time the science of athletics is
at present in its infancy, both whether we consider them as an end in
themselves (a very small affair), or as a means to an end (an immensely
large affair). Even the literature of the subject, that with which the
bookstalls teem, seems to be full of fallacies, to be dealt with
hereafter, and to a large extent to be based on one immense
fallacy--namely, that the possession of enormous muscles, and the
ability thereby to lift immense weights, is in itself an object worth
the attention of a reasonable man. And when one adds to this that the
actual acquirement of such power is in itself not always a very safe
process, possibly leading to strain and involving misuse of the muscles
themselves, it is not too much to say that if this, namely, the
acquiring of huge muscles and the mere power they give, at the sacrifice
in many cases of quickness, and in some at the risk of positive injury,
were all, such practice would be Athleticism gone crazy. On the other
hand, these periodicals would probably retort by saying, “What is the
use of being able merely to hit a golf ball two hundred yards, make a
totally untakeable stroke at racquets, hit over the pavilion at Lord’s,
or put in a hot shot at Association?” To this we readily answer, “There
is no use in it at all _in itself_.” But what is useful is to be
possessed of the quickness, not only of muscle and eye, which is
necessary to such a performance, but the quickness of seeing an
opportunity, and the having the body in such perfect poise, in such
perfect obedience to the will, that as soon as the opportunity occurs it
instantly and correctly takes advantage of it. The acquisition of mere
muscular force cannot produce this, and the professional strong man who
could lift a wiry golf player from the ground with one hand will, unless
he is something more than a professional strong man, be easily outdriven
by the other. This borders on the vital question--namely, What is the
use of athletics? And the answer is that _they are a help towards
training_, by which is meant not the cultivation of a particular set of
muscles in order to attain excellence at a particular game, still less
the cultivation of slow moving muscles of ponderous size adapted only
for the moving of heavy bodies, but the fitness of the entire body to
execute the orders of the will rapidly and correctly, the health
necessary and incidental to this, the endurance and strength which will
result from it.
Nor is this fitness, which we desire to see the birthright of the entire
race, at all confined to the body only, for to have the body in
subjection in this manner necessarily contributes to the mental and
moral health of a man. That his mind and morals may be extremely
healthy, though he does not know a cricket-bat from a golf-club, goes
without saying; but that athletics, from their engrossing nature to (we
believe) the average person, from the healthy fatigue which they
produce, from their insistence that a man should abstain from excess of
food and drink and other habits more injurious, contribute to the health
of mind and morals, is, we believe, beyond question. Training, in other
words, in the bigger sense in which we wish to apply the term, has for
its object not only fitness for any or for every athletic exercise, but
fitness for all work mental as well as bodily. Yet it is nearly as much
a mistake to devote all one’s time to keeping perfectly well, as it is
to disregard health altogether. We believe, in fact, that certain rules
of life, certain habits and certain daily exercises produce the state of
body which we denote by the phrase _being in Training_, and that this
adapts its owner, in so far as he is adaptable, for any work he has to
do. Not that there is any one fixed mode of life, any one diet, or any
one exercise which will suit everybody, but there are certain general
lines of health, broad paths which should be approximately followed, or
at any rate given a trial. For in these matters the personal equation
must be taken into consideration, and the diet and exercise that are
beneficial to the heavily-built man of fourteen stone are not only not
necessarily beneficial to a light-weight, but may be positively
injurious, though, of course, it is perfectly true that frankly
unwholesome diet or continuance of unhealthy habits would be injurious
both for the one and the other. On this point ordinary systems of
training, even when in such competent hands as those who have charge of
the University crews, seem to us capable of being bettered. The entire
crew, broadly speaking, are treated as if they were eight identical
specimens of one machine, as if what is the best for one must
necessarily be the best for all. This assumption is not only not proved;
it is on the face of it highly improbable.
But it is infinitely more important that a city full of folk living, by
the exigencies of their work, under far from favourable conditions,
should be in decent health, than that a boatful of strong young men,
living in the best conditions, should be at the tip-top of excellence of
which they are capable on a given morning; and in the consideration of
the question of training, what we say is submitted to the attention not
only of those who have some definite athletic trial in front of them,
though it is hoped that even these may find something of profit herein,
but of those who have to lead a sedentary life, which does not naturally
suit them, and find that their health, and through their health their
work, suffers. No doubt in such cases there must be compromise to a
certain degree; for some persons unfavourable hours of work, or
ill-ventilated rooms are practically (at present anyhow) unavoidable,
but even here there will be found to be possible not only certain rules
which will mitigate the ill-results that would naturally follow, but
certain corrective measures which will, to some extent, prevent the
ill-results following at all.
It is in the crowded life of cities that these difficulties most beset
the problem of how to bring health within the reach, not of course of
those who suffer from definite disease, for that is the work of doctors
and physicians, but of those who in surroundings which suited them would
naturally be healthy. Hard brain-work, for instance, especially in a
dead and vitiated atmosphere, though it produces merely headache in
some, produces in many others (both the present writers are cases in
point) violent appetite, and the natural impulse is to take large
quantities of solid food. The result of this would of course be extreme
somnolence, and a subsequent awakening from a sleep that is as different
from nature-demanded sleep as is light from darkness, with an extreme
attack of general inability. Now such a meal as this, which produced in
the brain-worker somnolence and inability, would very likely have
produced in the man who was shooting all day nothing but an added zest
for his sport. In the one case the food goes, so to speak, to the right
place; in the other to the wrong one. Yet how comparatively few of us
study our health even in so superficial a manner as to know that
appetite, when one lives in abnormal conditions, is not by any means the
same thing as appetite when one lives wholesomely in the open air. And
how many fewer have the sense, even if they know it, to put the lesson
into practice, and deliberately alter their diet to suit the conditions
under which they are bound to live.
Again, there are many who, when able to take exercise, are healthy and
fit for any work that they may have to do, in whom the difficulty,
almost the impossibility, of getting it in the ordinary way in towns,
produces a marked decline in health and consequently in output of work.
Here, in a chapter devoted to the consideration of the question as
applied to those who must live in towns, we shall discuss the
possibility of athletic clubs to be brought within the means of those to
whom such clubs as at present exist are not, by reason of expense and
other causes, in any way accessible. For all these, also, we shall
suggest such daily exercises as can be taken in a minimum of time in the
minimum of space, which have for their object not the acquisition of
huge muscles, but the acquisition of healthy nerves and muscles, prompt
to obey, and swift to act. For these, too, as indeed for everyone,
certain perfectly simple hints will be given about the use of air, and
how to breathe properly, the use of water, warm to cleanse, hot or cold
to brace, and hot vapour baths to counteract that persistent clogging of
the passages of the skin which more particularly besets those whose life
is passed in towns, where there is less air, less exercise, more dirt,
and a tendency in all to indulge excessively (considering the
conditions) in food and stimulants.
Within the last few decades, it is perfectly true, the strides that have
been made towards the ultimate sanitary perfection of living are
enormous. Vast sums of money are quite properly spent annually on
securing for town and country dwellers alike, in answer to the demands
made by scientific investigators into the theory of microbes, pure water
supplies, ventilation and light in dwelling-rooms, systems of drainage
and disinfectants, and inspections of food which shall reduce, as far as
possible, such dangers as are universally incident to life and health.
Yet in a way, admirable as such expenditure and research is, admirable
also as are the results which have followed it, these natural provisions
for health deal more with the surroundings of the body than with the
body itself. Tenement houses are built on the most approved sanitary
principles, but that done it is left to the discretion of the
inhabitants of them (provided they do not keep pigs or poultry in their
bedrooms) to decide as to how they shall live in them. Board schools are
built with rooms containing so many cubic feet of air per person, but
that done the teachers are allowed to keep the windows hermetically
closed. Inspectors of food, again quite properly, destroy barrows of
decaying fish, and impose fines on their vendors, but no instruction is
given to either rich or poor as to the nature of foods, and in
consequence, with the best will in the world, they take quantities of an
expensive and stimulating food, when what they really need is a cheap
and nutritious one. Interesting and costly experiments are made as to
the bacilli of various diseases, and numberless means of dealing with
them are suggested in text-books, but what is not done is to inform
people, except in the vaguest manner, as to how they may prevent such
bacilli finding a suitable, nay a possible, home in their bodies.
Instead, it is here our intention to go to the object itself, to the
putting of the body in such condition as will render it not only, from
its inherent health, far less liable to be attacked by disease, but as
will make it as far as possible a fit servant of the will, ready and
prompt to act, unclogged by the débris of excess, far more capable of
work than was its wont, and capable, too, of better work. It will thus
be saved not from disease only, but from a continual condition of being
slightly unfit, even in the case of those who (rightly in comparison
with the general average of health) consider themselves healthy. Nor is
such a benefit, if obtainable, limited to the present, for historically
it is perfectly certain that both the bodily and mental health of any
one generation depend very largely on the condition of the previous
generation; since habits which are the progenitors of tendencies can be
formed by any one in whom the will-power is ever so little alive.
Further, in this wonderful intermingling of mind and body which we know
as man, there is no change possible to one which does not affect the
other, and just as deficiencies of mind produce physical ill-health, so
a more healthy and cleanly condition of body produces a more healthy and
cleanly mind. For who shall say of how much immorality bodily stimulants
and overfeeding are not the lawful and genuine parents, or for how much
depression, morose spirits, and stagnated languor of mind that organ
known as the liver is not entirely responsible?
Hitherto training has been, and still is, largely regarded as a sort of
monopoly of the few, and is considered by many to be mysteriously
connected with beefsteaks and a total abstinence from tobacco. That such
practices come under the head of certain special species of training,
and no doubt in many cases are admirably fitted for the production of
the highest possible excellence in one or other branch of athletics, is
quite possible; but what we mean by Training, by the sort of Training,
that is, which is within the reach, and lies almost in the sphere of
duty, of everyone, is a less specialized and infinitely more important
condition, for it means, as we have said before, a condition of body
that will enable one to get the most possible out of oneself, whether
the work in hand is mental, spiritual, or merely physical. But in the
ensuing pages it is to be hoped that the reader will find an absence of
dogmatism; such at any rate has been one of the chief objects of the
authors. Theories and suggestions will be put forward, for instance,
about the use of simpler foods; but it is to be remembered that they
are, though supported by solid evidence, only meant to be theories and
suggestions worth trying, we venture to hope, in those cases where the
ordinary heavy meat meal produces on its consumer somnolence and
disinclination to activity. Again, in the way of exercises, certain
brisk full movements instead of dumb-bells, the use of which many find
laborious, monotonous and wearying, are put forward as worth a trial,
seeing that in many instances they have given satisfactory results. The
book, in fact, is meant to be anything rather than a beaten hedged-in
path beyond the bounds of which none may stray, for this is exactly what
seems to the authors to be the defect in most existing systems of
training. It is meant rather to show a not unpleasant track leading, as
it were, through fields, and mainly, it is hoped, in the right
direction.
Finally, even at the risk of wearisome reiteration, the word “Training”
throughout is to be understood not in the sense of Training for merely
some special athletic event, though it includes such, but Training for
the ordinary work-a-day businesses of life, so that we may be able to do
them better, quicker, with more taste for them, and with less fatigue.
CHAPTER II.
FALLACIES AND DEFECTS IN PRESENT SYSTEMS OF TRAINING.
Without for the moment taking into consideration those millions of
London who stifle in crowded slums, on insufficient or unsuitable food,
and many of whom have inherited from birth some taint of constitution,
and concerning ourselves for the moment only with those within whose
reach, broadly speaking, are all the expedients known for insuring
health, we should find it curious and probably depressing to ascertain,
if we could, what proportion _felt well_, given they had no definite
cause of ill-health which it was out of their power to remove. Many
would put down their comparatively lower level of health while living in
London to the fact that they were working hard. This, if true, is a sad
and sobering reflection, since it would seem to imply that Nature had
not designed the average healthy individual to work hard; and though it
is probably infinitely better that people should work hard, and feel
slightly below par all the time, than that they should devote their
whole time to keeping well, yet it would be unsatisfactory if we were
forced to believe that continued hard work cannot be compatible with
continued good health. Many again would say that they never feel well
without exercise, and that it is impossible to get exercise in London.
That they can get sufficient exercise anywhere, with a very small
expense of time, we hope to show in a later chapter; but, in the
meantime, have such tried deliberately and unswervingly to eat far less
than they feel inclined, or to use some sort of definite selection in
the matter of what they eat? Others again would (quite rightly) put down
their slight but chronic indisposition to an absence of air; such
perhaps do not know what an immensely increased supply of air everyone
can get by always keeping bedroom windows wide open.
Now to many such the idea of using training as a means of merely keeping
well is probably novel. They are accustomed to feel slightly
unwell--that perhaps is too strong a term--when they are in a town and
at work, and having always felt thus have acquiesced in what we may call
a vicious habit. But they have always understood training to mean a
_régime_ of fixed exercise (founded on beefsteaks), which is as
impossible for them as it would also be unsuitable for them; or, in a
modified form, twenty minutes or half an hour with dumb-bells every
morning and evening. Many have probably tried dumb-bells; some, no
doubt, reap considerable benefit from their use, but not a few, and both
the present writers are among them, after giving them a good trial,
loathe the sight of them. And numbers, in such a case, have abandoned
themselves, with more or less content, to continuing to feel slightly
below par, and praying for the holidays.
Now the use of dumb-bells and developers is becoming something of a
fetish, of a cherished idol, and, backed as it is by well-known names,
is a formidable-looking god to throw stones at. But there seem to the
present writers to be many grave objections to such systems as are
constantly followed, whether they are used by athletes or by the much
larger class of those who merely wish to get exercise from them. The
_primâ facie_ objection in the case of both is their extreme monotony.
It is necessary apparently to raise the arms slowly in turn (bending the
elbow till the dumb-bell is level with the shoulder) upwards of a
hundred times or more: it is necessary to do the same again with the
backs of the hands out, to extend the arms from the shoulder outwards,
from the shoulder upwards, to bend the wrists to and fro (still with
these infernal implements grasped in the hands), to make motions as if
drawing water first on one side and then on the other, to hit out, with
the weight in the hands, at an imaginary foe; in fact to push, raise, or
pull this weight in practically every direction that it will go, a vast
number of times. “Developers” have, as a rule, the same defects; the
movements are slow, and a continued effort against permanent resistance,
while the greater part of the exercise which they give is not for the
greater muscles. Then follow--we are intentionally vague, and wish to
show only the general lines of many systems--exercises for the muscles
of the stomach and of the legs. For the breathing muscles of the chest,
there are also exercises which not being concerned for the most part
with these dead-weights we have found generally excellent. The masters
of such systems also, as a rule, advocate practising in front of a
looking-glass, stripped as far as may be, in order to observe the play
of the muscles. This also is admirable advice.
Now it will be noticed at once with regard to these exercises that by
far the majority of them are for the arms, and that even when, as in
certain of them, the object is to develop the breathing muscles, the
hands still hold the dumb-bells. In other words, something like
three-quarters of the ordinary dumb-bell exercises, as advised and
practised, are exercises in which the stress of the movements lies on
muscles of the wrist and fore-arm, biceps, triceps, and deltoid (the
shoulder muscle). What is the result if the instructions are
conscientiously observed? That the muscles of the arms get developed
ludicrously out of proportion to the rest of the body, for no purpose as
far as we can see except that of lifting and holding weights. The far
larger and more important thigh muscles and calf muscles, the great
muscles of the trunk and chest, have perhaps in some of these systems no
more work to do, when added together, than the muscles of the arm alone.
For certain games it is of course necessary to have considerable power
in the arm, yet (even for games) it is of far more importance to have
the larger muscles adequately developed. But granted (with certain
important reservations to be stated hereafter) that such exercises are
good for certain games, we contend that they are, if not harmful, at any
rate most ill-adapted for the proper development of the whole body, and
for supplying exercise to those who need it, particularly in town life,
for the sake of health. Certain muscles, those of the shoulder and arm,
are exercised out of all proportion, whereas the larger body muscles,
those in fact which are particularly needed for the correct and
healthful carriage of the body, so as to provide the heart and the
organs of breathing and digestion with free room to work in, are left
comparatively neglected. Indeed, as far as health goes, it would be
probably better for the man who has to sit at a desk for six or seven
hours a day to sit upright only, and take no exercise at all, than to go
religiously through his course before coming to his office, and then do
his work in the cramped and huddled position which is natural to many
people. But, and this is an even more serious charge, some exercises
recommended in certain systems, pursued no doubt by people who for years
have been in search of strength, advocate exercises which are positively
risky, with regard to strain on certain parts of the body, exercises in
fact which might tend to increase the strength of a strong man, but
would be almost dangerous for a less strongly-developed one. Again, and
this objection applies to athletes even more than to the ordinary man in
search of health by means of daily exercise, are not these slow
movements of dumb-bells and slow steady resistance against india-rubber
productive of quite the wrong sort of strength? No doubt the incessant
raising of a dumb-bell above the head, a heavy pushing stroke, will tend
to enable the pusher to raise greater and greater weights above the
head, but does the ordinary man, does the athlete himself desire to get
strength of that kind? For the ordinary man, in the first place, does
the development of fore-arm, biceps, or triceps tend in any way to
increase his health, except inasmuch as the exertion thus put forth
certainly enlarges some few muscles and tends to produce action of the
skin by reason of heat? As far as muscular development goes he would do
far better to exercise the larger muscle-areas, and for the other, a
Turkish bath will give him the equivalent of a week’s exercising. The
fallacy that lies at the bottom of this dumb-bell and “developer” work,
in fact, is that large and prominent muscles imply not only strength but
health. That the use of muscles tends to both is undeniable, but for
purposes of health the muscles employed are mainly the unimportant
ones, while for purposes of strength, valuable chiefly to those who wish
to employ muscles with a view to excellence in athletics, the strength
obtained is wholly the wrong sort of strength.
It is here that the dumb-bell and developer system goes utterly and
hopelessly astray. Used as an adjunct, it will assist a weak muscle to
arrive at a certain girth and bulk, but considered as a cause of any
successful stroke at a game, it is much more an enemy than a friend. For
at all games, with a possible exception perhaps in the case of rowing,
as far as strength comes into the question, it comes in as a motor-power
to produce speed, whereas dumb-bell exercises have for their object, as
a whole, the slow pushing of gradually increased weights. A modicum of
strength is of course necessary to propel anything anywhere, but the
main thing, the thing to be acquired, is speed in the muscle, in order
to impart velocity to the object. And the muscles of those whose sole
training is dumb-bell exercise are admirably unfitted to impart it. The
weights they can lift are no doubt prodigious, but we doubt whether any
man reared entirely on dumb-bells (and the more he had of that diet, the
better for our point) could hit a ball over the pavilion at Lord’s, make
a really difficult force at tennis, drive a golf ball two hundred yards,
turn a fast outside back-bracket at skating, or send in a really hot
shot at Association football. In fact, the more developed he was on
dumb-bell lines, the less likely he would be to be able to do any of
these things; the muscle acquired is of the wrong order, it has
sacrificed its speed for bulk, it is the strong engine of the
luggage-train, not the strong engine of the greyhound express. And if
this is not so, how does it come about that some professional strong
man has never yet attained immense pre-eminence in any branch of
athletics, if such strength were the desirable sort? Surely in his spare
moments he might send a few balls over the gasworks at Kennington, or
drive the green of the long hole at Sandwich. At golf, particularly,
there is no limit to the weight of his club, he may use what weapon he
pleases, and since the carry of a ball is wholly dependent on its
starting velocity, he with his great strength should be able to send it
beyond the dreams of any medal-winner. But as a matter of fact he
cannot, not because he misjudges it, for many strong men, we believe,
have an excellent eye, but because his muscles, trained to overcome
resistance by slow, prolonged effort, cannot act fast. Ah, if dumb-bells
could speak, what a tale they would have to tell! They would also cease
to be dumb-bells; this would be an advantage.
In addition to this the dumb-bell man is continually putting a
comparatively long strain on himself. To hit a half-volley at cricket,
to drive a golf ball is a short concentrated effort, and one in which
the whole swing and weight of the body assists. But to raise an iron bar
above the head is a long strain: the bar is slowly pushed up, arteries
dilate, the face is suffused, the heart and the blood-vessels, though
perhaps not taxed beyond what they were meant to bear--what that is one
cannot say--are, at any rate, largely taxed. Meantime the arm, the
function of which is mainly speed, moves slowly and with the utmost
effort. From its length, in comparison to its girth, it was quite
clearly designed for quickness, and yet the poor victim has been
gradually trained, by means of most tedious exercises, to become a
cart-horse instead of a racer. Pure gymnastics, which only turn the arms
into legs, are bad enough--dumb-bells turn the arms into a lift at a
second-rate hotel. It would be as sensible, in the hopes to acquire
rapidity of finger at the pianoforte, to train each finger separately to
lift heavy weights. Finally, what is the result if an abnormally
developed man has by reason of rheumatism or other causes to drop his
exercises? It is not, we believe, yet proved, but the opinion of medical
men tends to show that if one has developed a muscle to very great bulk
in the past, and then drops its use, a sort of fatty degeneration sets
in. Cheerful.
To recapitulate, the results we arrive at are as follows: Dumb-bell and
developer exercises as a whole, according to the generality of received
systems, are extremely monotonous. A motion is repeated many times, for
the sake of obtaining bulk in a certain muscle--in order to produce
quantity rather than quality, in fact. These motions take a considerable
time owing to their number, and for the most part they are dull, owing
to the slowness of the movement occasioned by the weight to be moved,
which, as the patient gets stronger, is gradually increased. The
slowness, the push of the movement, rather than the drive of the
movement, is often recommended: the movements, we are told, _should_ be
made slowly.
In the second place, certain muscles, for instance, of the forearm and
arm, are exercised unduly, unless the truth is that the business of man
is not to keep well and be fit for his work, but like Sisyphus to roll a
stone up a hill. Just as these are unduly exercised, so others are
unfairly omitted or slurred over, the larger and more important muscles
of the chest and trunk are starved of exercise in comparison to the
arm-muscles. Also in certain systems certain muscles are wrongly used:
muscles that are meant for support chiefly, as far as we can judge of
the purpose of the human frame, are deluded into becoming muscles of
motion, with the result that the naturally quiescent nerves and tissues
underlying them are improperly excited.
Thirdly, supposing that this great development of muscle (chiefly muscle
in the arm) is successfully attained, does it serve any practical use
whatever as regards either health or use? As far as health goes, it
passes the bounds of imagination to conceive that the main organs of the
body will be benefited by excessive biceps, whereas as regards strength,
for all purposes except the lifting and holding of weights, it is
extremely doubtful whether an increase of such strength does not imply
a corresponding decrease in speed and agility. The fastest runners are
not those with prodigious muscles, the hardest hitters have not a
swollen biceps. The test, in fact, of fitness and power of the body lies
not in measurements, but in the ability to perform certain movements
with correctness and rapidity, to be able to make complex movements, to
be capable of endurance, and to perform such movements with economy of
effort.
Many reservations must be made, however, in what appears to be an
all-round condemnation, and if we criticise the system of the most
prominent of the dumb-bell advocates, Mr. Sandow, we shall certainly
find a great deal to praise in what he says. His remarks about
practising before a mirror, for instance, are excellent, since to
observe the play of the muscles is, or ought to be to anyone with an
eye for movement, of immense interest, and takes off (this he does not
say) from the unspeakable tedium of the exercise itself. So, too, when
he advises cold water, open windows, moderate diet, abstention from
anything which disagrees, he has nought which is not advisable. Equally
true, too, is his insistence on attention of the most fixed order to the
work in hand, though perhaps he does not sufficiently allow for the
period in which a set exercise indulged in so often as some of his,
must, almost necessarily, become mechanical and automatic. For just as
it would be impossible that a practised player at any game should
_consciously_ attend to what he is doing (he sees, for instance, a ball
which is certainly a half-volley, but does not know he thinks about
half-volleys at all, yet hits correctly), so after a time a dumb-bell
exercise becomes (or should become) mechanical. That perhaps is its
strength: that certainly is its weakness. For this reason: all exercises
are, or should be, exercises towards an end. When that end is attained,
there is no longer any need for them, unless the end be merely to alter
the circulation of the blood; and something fresh, for the sake of
stimulus and interest, should be begun. By these dumb-bell exercises,
strength sufficient for the purposes of life can be no doubt attained;
but after that, unless our mission is to lift weights, they are
superfluous. That the muscles of the arm, that all muscles in fact
should be in a state of efficiency is highly desirable, but in a
sedentary life, in the life for which exercises are most obviously
useful, it is the large muscle-areas, the muscles which the stillness of
sitting tends to degenerate, that should be kept up to the scratch. The
inability, in fact, to sit habitually in a chair in a position in which
the lungs and heart will act naturally, is a greater defect than the
inability to raise 56 lbs. above the head in the left hand. Practically
perfect health is compatible with an abnormally weak forearm and wrist:
abnormal weakness, on the other hand, of the muscles of the chest and
abdomen always implies imperfect health.
Finally, the personal equation is not sufficiently considered in any
system of exercise that has come across our notice. There is Chart I.
for children, Chart II. for boys between 14 and 18, Chart III. for
adults. Any system of weight-moving, such as dumb-bells, will never
satisfactorily fill such a need as here exists, unless the teacher will
see and examine personally (provided also he has the requisite
knowledge) each one of his pupils. A thick-set boy of fifteen, though he
weighs the same as a tall lanky boy of the same age, requires a
perfectly different set of exercises to produce in him fit and robust
manhood, while the tall lanky boy may be injured by exercises that are
good for the average boy of his age and weight. But that there are
exercises which are practically good for everybody we fully believe. Of
this we treat later. Again, for people who wish to excel at games, to
begin with dumb-bells seems a mistake, for it teaches first the slow
movement, whereas speed of movement should come first. That they give
bulk to the muscles is undeniable, and there is a great deal to be said
for bulk, if only it has the power of speed. In any case these dumb-bell
and developer exercises should be alternated with quick, full movements,
so as to preserve the speed of the action of the muscles.
Now most people who feel the need of, and are better for, regular
exercise are accustomed, when they have leisure and opportunity, to
play some sort of game; and how enormously this tendency is increasing
is shown, to take one instance alone, by the huge number of golf links
which have sprung up all over the kingdom, and in particular round and
close to London, accessible to the city man in summer for a short round
perhaps when he returns home in the evening, and certainly used by him
on Saturday afternoon and probably Sunday. He does not, as a matter of
fact, hurry home in order to practise his beloved dumb-bells, he is not
late for dinner because he cannot leave his dumb-bells, but because he
will finish his round at golf. A game, in fact, is more enjoyed by most
people than mere exercise for the sake of exercise. The dumb-bells are
used when a game is not to be had. But these dumb-bell exercises, as we
have pointed out, do not, except in so far as they may strengthen an
inordinately weak muscle, improve or help a man’s game, unless we
consider weight-lifting a game. Six months’ continuous exercise of the
slow pushing and pulling order to overcome the inertia of the dumb-bell
or the contraction of india-rubber will probably not lengthen his drive,
since they do not teach speed of movement. That the long driver at golf
may be very strong is beyond question, but it is equally beyond question
that the professional strong man will incessantly be out-driven by a
player whose muscles are half the size of the other’s, because the
latter has cultivated swiftness of movement, the former has not. It is
for this among other reasons that in the chapter on exercises we
advocate, at any rate, until great speed has become easy, not the use of
dumb-bells--anyhow not of dumb-bells of more than nominal weight--but a
system of brisk, full movements, increasing not in regard to the
resistance to be overcome, but in their own complexity. They require the
same concentration of attention, but they are not fatiguing, although
they give full exercise to the muscles. For it is a great error to
suppose, as so many do, that fatigue is a criterion of exercise, that
one has not had enough exercise, in fact, until one feels tired. Indeed,
the converse, or something like the converse, is more nearly true,
namely, that exercise which leaves one tired is either excessive or more
probably is of the wrong sort. Fatigue is, perhaps, necessary if very
severe exercise has been gone through, but it is a thing not to be
sought after, and if possible to be avoided. As far as it is concerned
with the muscles themselves, it shows that they have been overtaxed (an
automatic signal put out by nature, saying, “Stop”), but probably in
many cases feelings of fatigue arise from other causes, and a very
little exercise will produce it, not because the muscles are overtaxed,
but because there is something wrong with other organs of the body.
Morning fatigue, the disinclination to get up after a good night’s rest,
not from laziness pure and simple, but from genuine languor, is an
extreme instance of this. But the dumb-bell user will not get over this
by putting in a vast amount of work for the biceps and triceps, though a
couple of minutes spent in using certain larger muscle-areas, with the
accompaniment it may be of massage, which one can easily administer
himself, will probably largely alleviate it. But instead he flexes the
arm a hundred and twenty times, lifting to each shoulder, perhaps, in
all a dead weight of 960 lbs.
Furthermore, these dumb-bell exercises, in which the weight of the
dumb-bells is gradually increased, become after a year or two very
severe indeed, and one would like to know the collective opinion of
doctors on such a point as this. Can it be good for a man of forty-five
or fifty to manipulate weights like these, performing say for
half-an-hour a day a series of exercises with them, some of which at any
rate entail considerable strain? And if these exercises are not good,
what is he to do? If after some years of hard work at them he does drop
them, does he not become liable, or tend to become liable, to a fatty
degeneration of the muscles, or at any rate to an increase of fat over
the muscles? In the meantime, if the course has been “successful,” if
the man is enormously developed in the muscles, particularly of the arm
and shoulder, it will quite assuredly be extremely difficult, if not
impossible, for him to change those muscles whose birth and breeding is
due to these slow pushing movements that are intended to overcome the
inertia of dead weight, into muscles which have to deal swift, not
heavy, blows at objects which for practical purposes (golf balls, tennis
balls, even cricket balls) have hardly any inertia at all. In other
words, he will find it difficult to become even passably proficient at
games which require rapidity of striking--and it is hard to name the
game which does not--and yet entail almost no strain on the heart and
arteries, in order to supply the place of those heavy exercises which he
feels himself unable, without risk, to continue. Besides this, it seems
not unlikely that the perpetual straining may deaden the fineness of
touch and judgment so necessary in most games. But the quick, brisk
movements such as we recommend in the chapter on exercises seem to us to
be singularly without the disadvantages of dumb-bell systems, as
regards monotony, for their very speed is undoubtedly exhilarating; nor
do they admit of any risk in the way of straining, while they exercise
the muscles more than dumb-bells do, though they do not so much
strengthen them. They are, therefore, quite as health-giving, since
health, unless a man is positively suffering from muscular feebleness,
has practically nothing to do with sheer muscular strength, while it has
a great deal to do with muscular fitness. On the other hand, they have
this great advantage over dumb-bell systems, namely, that they directly
and rapidly tend to increase the speed with which the muscles can make
their effort, and thus for that very large class of people who desire to
play games, and do so whenever they can, these movements are of the
greatest help even in learning the game, and also in keeping the muscles
in actual and _absolute_ practice for the game itself. They help, in
fact, the right sort of muscle, they teach the light, rapid stroke which
drives a ball. For the special exercises for each game, exercises which
have been tested and found of service, we shall have to refer readers to
the volumes on those games, which will subsequently appear, though even
in the general list given in the chapter on exercise in this volume, no
doubt they will pick out some that will be of service to them, whatever
game they may wish to be in practice for.
But it is to the ordinary unathletic man, the man who does not really
care about being in practice for a game, that we quite as sincerely
recommend them, for it is our hope that he will find them, as we
ourselves have done, pleasant and exhilarating (where we have found
dumb-bells tedious and wearisome), economical in point of time, though
they give, so we believe, more exercise than dumb-bells do, without
strain and without fatigue. But they do not, and not for a moment do we
claim it for them, increase the actual bulk of the muscles with anything
approaching the rapidity possible in dumb-bell exercises, and if a man
happens to want a sixteen-inch biceps without delay (or reason) it will
be mere waste of time for him to use them.
There are many other points in which systems of training, in common with
these dumb-bell exercises, seem to be defective, which need not be
mentioned here. It is perfectly true that, as a whole, men in
training--say a week after they have been training--are in excellent
health. But this health we soberly believe to be realisable by men
living in towns, with sedentary occupations, and, as they say, no
opportunity for exercise. The man who must be in London six days out of
the seven, practically abandons the attempt to keep in good health,
without knowing what easy aids lie ready to his hand. He has no idea how
much simple treatments, in the way of heat, baths, exposure of the body
to the air, can do for him in the way of enabling that wonderful
mechanism, the skin, which never sleeps, but works night and day at its
business of cleansing, to have a fair chance. Such a man has a cold, and
acquiesces in this state of things, saying he always has a cold in
February, as if he were rather doing his duty than otherwise. It never
occurs to him that to have a cold _is_ to be unhealthy, that in such a
case there is inflammation, and the mucous membrane is working double
tides to throw it off. Such inflammation, of course, must have a cause,
and is usually put down, often correctly, to sitting in a draught, or
not changing when wet. But when one is really well, living, let us say,
in the country, and getting wet perhaps two or three times a day, one
does not catch cold. In London under such circumstances many people do.
Why? Not because it is London, but because they are below par, liable to
attack. And it is a gross mistake on their part to acquiesce in such a
state of things. It is in most cases easily remediable, and that with
little expense of time, and none at all in money for doctors’ bills and
abhorrent drugs.
Finally with regard to training and practice for certain games, there
are two fallacies, commonly considered truisms, which are worth
commenting on. The first is that mere practice is conducive to
excellence, than which astounding statement there was never anything
less proven. It is dreadful to think of the amount of time which real
enthusiasts give to lone and solitary practice without ever dreaming
that what they are doing is probably merely emphasizing and making more
radical an already existing fault. Such an enthusiast (and the
professors of his game encourage him in it) will take half a dozen golf
balls on to a lonely upland, or half a dozen racquet balls into a lonely
court, and there continue with unabated zest to do things wrong. Such
practice is merely pernicious.
A second fallacy, connected with this point, is that style is
unattainable. For what is style? Apparent ease to the man who knows
little about it: real ease to the man who does know. And this ease
is--with certain exceptions, as in a _tour de force_ necessary to get
out of difficulties--certainly acquirable. Awkwardness and effort are,
as a rule, the effect of bad teaching or no teaching. For it must be
remembered that while a ball an inch above the net at tennis, a back
bracket at skating, a slog over the pavilion at Lord’s, to repeat
instances already used, are natural, in the sense that they are
compassable without misuse of the human frame, yet they imply accurate
and complex movements, which no one person would guess for himself. We
say “guess” advisedly, for all games are empirical.
And thus having to a certain extent cleared the ground we will pass to
construction.
CHAPTER III.
EXERCISE AND EXERCISES.
It will not in this chapter be necessary to go at all deeply into the
physiological effects and changes wrought in the body by exercise, but
at the same time for those interested in the subject it will be well to
sketch in the merest outline the general effect of exercise, and give
the reasons why (a rule so universal as to be considered as practically
without exception) those who take exercise, especially when they take it
in air, where there is a sufficiency of oxygen, are in better health
than those who do not.
Now every organ in the body is either in itself a muscle or a system of
muscles, or is controlled by muscles. That is to say, none of the
infinite processes incidental not only to any movement, but to even
perfectly passive life, are independent of muscular action, automatic it
may be, and unconscious or sub-conscious, but still muscular.
The action of the heart itself, for instance, which is, in ordinary
circumstances, entirely automatic and absolutely essential to life,
consists in the alternate contraction and expansion of muscle, which
sends the blood to all parts of the body; and the heart, like all other
muscles, can be made stronger with suitable exercises, can be overtaxed
by undue strain, and can lapse into feebleness and degeneration if it is
not rightly and fully used. For the health of all muscles, apart from
their proper nourishment by food and air, lies in their proper use.
All muscles which are within our reach, so to speak, which by an effort
of will on our part are made to move some portion of the body, are
controlled by nerves, which transmit the message, as through a telegraph
wire, from the brain to the required place. By constant use it is
possible, as in the case of walking (in itself a rather complicated
movement), so to accustom the nerves to send their messages that, after
a time, the action of the muscles become automatic, and we are conscious
of no effort of will to make them work. The instinct of self-protection
is another instance of this automatic use of muscles; a man will put up
his arm or duck his head to avoid a blow without consciously bidding the
muscles of the arm or neck to act. Not only does continued use of a
proper kind give this speed to the communication between brain and
muscle, but--granted proper nourishment--it gives strength and health
to the muscles used; and, broadly speaking, the man who has _all_ the
muscles of his body in perfect working order, is physically a thoroughly
healthy man.
Now the full effects of muscular movement are far too complicated to be
spoken of with any completeness. Three, however, of the simplest and
most obvious may be mentioned. Exercise, as everyone knows, is
productive first of quickened respiration, quickened circulation, and
heat. Just as an engine burns coal in order to produce the steam which
moves it, so the muscles consume material in their working, and this
consumption of material again gives rise to waste products partly given
off (in the form of carbonic acid gas) by the lungs, which therefore are
called upon to supply a greater amount of oxygen. Hence the quickened
respiration. Similarly, more blood is required to feed the working
part, hence the heart is called upon to supply it with greater speed.
And thirdly, since exercise produces heat, and heat perspiration, the
pores of the skin are called upon to open for the purpose of exudation,
and pass out with the sweat many waste products.[1] Exercise, in short,
develops not only the particular muscles used, but whatever muscle is
used, the heart and the lungs as well (since they have muscles of their
own, which are called upon to work), and it gets rid of waste products
in the body by means immediately of the skin, and, if certain most
important muscles are used, by facilitating the action of the kidneys
and bowels. It also, as we have seen above, quickens the co-ordination
of brain, nerve and muscle, until with practice many movements become
automatic instead of comparatively slow. At the same time it uses up
nervous force just as it does muscular force, but only temporarily,
since rest and sleep automatically (and nobody yet knows how) restore
both.
This brief sketch will be enough for the moment to show why proper
exercise is beneficial to the body, and it will explain in a rough and
ready manner why respiration and circulation are quickened, and why
exercise produces (or should produce) appetite. Actual consumption of
materials has taken place, and in addition waste products, which give
rise to uric acid in the system, have been removed. But though in
general these effects (except when from serious weakness of the heart
exercise is positively dangerous) are beneficial to everybody, it does
not in the least follow that any haphazard exercise is beneficial to
everybody. Certain movements, which are to be highly recommended to the
robust, would if they were attempted by a man whose muscles were not so
developed, be either impossible to him, or, if effected, would strain
rather than strengthen him. Again, the object in general of exercise is
(apart from its three results mentioned above) to brisken and strengthen
harmoniously, and not to cause immense development of one or two sets of
muscles, leaving the others comparatively neglected. Of course, if there
is special weakness in any part it may be highly desirable to strengthen
that part, but as we have said above, what we may call mere
“Biceps-culture” is, though charming for the biceps, as long as the arm
does not get muscle-bound, no better a contributor to general health
than would be the cultivation of any other one muscle in the body,
while there are many which it would be far more useful to cultivate than
this. For by the use of the biceps, let us say, no other organ of the
body (except in so far as quickened respiration and circulation is the
result of muscular effort) is directly benefited, whereas by the use of
the extensive muscles of the chest in a proper manner, freedom and
strength are directly procured for the lungs, or by the use of the
muscles of the abdomen in a proper manner, the action of certain
internal organs is facilitated.
Now the main principles on which we base the system of exercise we
recommend are these. Complete development of the muscular system is
aimed at, and rapid obedience of the muscles to the will. The muscles
should be exercised to their full extent--_i.e._, they should make the
full movement which their contraction allows--this fast full
contraction is associated with the name of Mr. Macdonald Smith--and they
should also be made efficient in arrested movements; that is to say,
they should be able even in the middle of a rapid full movement to stop
at once, being in complete control of the will, even as a wolf, and this
is one of the seven wonders of the world, can check his spring while in
mid-air. How? God knows. Mere size of muscle, we believe, is in no way a
criterion either of health or of the sort of strength which we consider
to be desirable, and it is infinitely better for a man to have muscles
of but average size, provided they are prompt and obedient, than to be a
Farnese Hercules, if the bulk of muscle which he has made for himself is
but slow moving and incapable of briskness. The Farnese Hercules no
doubt could lift weights of prodigious heaviness, but if the acquisition
of this power has been attained at the cost of speed and promptitude,
we altogether fail to see how he is benefited. Correctness and control
are the first objects of muscle-culture; by proper practice comes
endurance, speed, and often very great muscular power. But power--slow
weight-lifting power--should be considered not as the first, still less
as the only object of exercise, but as a probable result. Furthermore,
though the lifting of dumb-bells is exceedingly useful in bringing an
exceptionally weak muscle up to the general level of the others,
dumb-bell work is, in itself, slow movement, and though even its
continued use may not be altogether destructive of quickness, yet it
cannot in any way be considered as conducive to it. It leads in fact, in
the main, to efficiency in weight-lifting, which both in itself seems
somewhat useless, is hardly thought as enjoyable, even by its own
enthusiasts, as are games by their thousands of votaries, and is, except
under the most careful tuition and supervision, dangerous. But in these
quick full movements practised either with no weights at all, or at the
most with exceedingly light ones, there is no risk of strain. Again,
while to judge by the letters and testimonials sent to well-known
schools of physical culture (and published by them) the increase of bulk
in muscle seems to be considered in itself a desirable object, the
acquisition of this bulk appears even in successful cases to be a
somewhat slow and laborious process, and entails more than half an
hour’s dumb-bell practice of slow movements every day. As supplementary
to brisk movements, it is more than possible that these mere
bulk-acquiring movements have their uses, but to base an entire system
on them is to miss the point, so it seems to us, of the culture of
muscles, if not to ruin the muscles themselves. It is also most
important to see that the exercise for each muscle shall be that for
which the muscle is naturally adapted; and exercises designed to bring
the muscles of the fingers or wrists into their utmost state of
efficiency will be evidently utterly different from those by which we
cultivate the muscles of the loins, the back, or the chest. For fingers
and wrists are obviously designed (and are regularly used) for far more
rapid movement than the muscles of the back, loins, or chest, and to
attempt to make these larger muscle areas work with the same rapidity as
the fingers attain in piano playing, is to give not only an impossible
task, but a most unsuitable one. Or again, to try to accustom the
fingers to sustain the weight borne every moment by the muscles of the
neck would even, if it were possible, utterly unfit them for the rapid
movements which are natural to them. Again, the muscles of the legs are
designed to bear and to move the whole weight of the body, and it is
thus obvious that exercises suitable for development of the arms may be
highly unsuitable for the development of the legs, which from their
greater natural bulk (designed for the continual shifting and sustaining
of weight) are not able to move with the flick of the wrist. And it is
here also that dumb-bells and indeed gymnastics generally seem to us to
go wrong. It is to the arms in dumb-bell exercise that all this slow
weight-moving is assigned, while really the essence of gymnastics seems
to be to treat the arms like legs, and let them bear the whole weight of
the body either passive or in motion.
Thus it appears to us a truer and more sensible way of exercise to give
each muscle, as far as may be, the kind of work for which it was
intended: to give to the wrists, fingers, forearms, exercises of great
speed, to give to the muscles of the legs exercises of speed certainly
(but of less speed, since they are weight-carriers), of balance and of
flexibility (thus enabling the body to start quickly in any required
direction) and of sustaining power, to give to the big areas of muscle
round the spine, abdomen and loins exercises that will enable them to do
more easily their pillar-like work, and allow the underlying organs of
the body free play, to give to the muscles of the ribs and chest that
power of expansion and contraction which will enable the lungs to
breathe fully at all times, and in emergency quickly, so that when
greater demands are made by the working body for supplies of oxygen,
they may be readily supplied without a struggle for breath. And if these
things are possible--as we entirely believe--we hold that the man who
has attained them through exercise will be a greater debtor to exercise
than he who can lift large weights with limbs required for other
purposes.
One of the very best times for exercise, and also for most people the
most convenient, is early in the morning before breakfast. The body is
(or should be) fresh and untired, and by exercise it is given a good
start for the day, and fortified against the congesting effects of the
long sedentary work which must perhaps necessarily consume the greater
part of the ensuing hours. On the other hand, some people habitually
devote the freshness of the morning to brain-work, for the brain like
the body should be fittest then, and one of the present writers always
does his hardest brain-work immediately on waking, reserving his
exercise for later. In any case, it is far better to take exercise on an
empty stomach than after a meal, since in the latter case the energy of
the body is largely occupied with the work of digestion, which will be
imperfectly, or at any rate slowly, performed, if it is taxed
simultaneously by other calls on it. Again, in order to give full and
easy play to the muscles, as little clothing as possible should be worn,
since they are thus unimpeded in the movements, and also because, as
mentioned in the chapter on light and air, there is nothing more
hardening and invigorating to the body than exposure to fresh air. The
exercise itself will very soon warm the body, though perhaps at first
those unaccustomed to exposure will find it wiser to take their hot bath
or hot and cold bath before exercise, so as to start already warmed. But
all those who are accustomed to have a cold bath, and feel no chill
afterwards, may safely begin with the exercises, and reserve the
delightful thrill of the water for afterwards, when they are even
warmer from the exercise than they would have been on getting out of
bed.
Be sure also that there is plenty of air in the room, for you will use
more when you are exercising by reason of the quickened respiration.
Your window, it is to be hoped, has been open all night. It is really a
pity to shut it. Then stand before a looking-glass, so that you may, by
the sight of the reflected movement in front of you, be sure you are
doing it fully and correctly, and may the more easily fix your attention
wholly and entirely on what you are doing. For it is by attention that
you will acquire ease and facility till, as in learning a thing by
heart, the movements eventually become if not automatic, at least
extremely easy.[2]
The following exercises are for the most part exercises of full
contraction and full extension. The full extension should be not only
made but also _held_ for a fraction of time. The parts of the body which
are not being used should be kept quiet and easy for the sake of
self-control, economy, and gracefulness. Each exercise is from one
position (1) to another (2), and then back again. This we may accompany
by saying to ourselves “1-2, 1-2.” As a variant, we may alter the time,
and say “1-2-1, 2-1-2,” and so on, changing the pace, intervening time,
etc. There must be no dulness. The photographs are of people who do not
use dumb-bells.
EXERCISE I.--(For the wrist and forearm.)
Clench the right hand, holding it out straight in front of you,
with the back of the hand downwards. Unclasp the fingers with a
snap and simultaneously move the whole hand round on the pivot of
the wrist and forearm as far as it will go. Then come back as
smartly as possible to the original clenched hand position. Repeat
about twenty times, making the movement as quickly as you can in
both directions without sacrificing correctness or fulness. Then do
the same with the left hand.
EXERCISE II.--(For upper arm.)
Extend the arm out at full stretch from the shoulder sideways, with
hand and fingers completely extended and palm downwards; then bend
it as smartly as possible to its full extent at the elbow, bringing
the hand close to the head, with its palm, not its back, nearest to
the head, and at the same time clenching the fist. Go back to
former position again as smartly as possible. Repeat from twenty to
thirty times. Exercise the left arm in the same way. See
Photograph. Afterwards both arms may be exercised together.
EXERCISE III.--(Shoulder and chest muscles.)
Bring the hands together at full extent of arms in front of the
face. From there bring them quickly back till they are in a line
with the shoulders, at the same time drawing in a long breath.
Return them to the first position, expelling the breath. With a
very little practice it will be found that they can be brought back
considerably further than the line of the shoulders. Repeat ten
times.
EXERCISE IV.--(Shoulder and chest muscles.)
Stand erect with the arms by the side. Then raise them slowly
outwards, still at their full extent, till they meet above the
head, drawing in a long breath all the time. Pause for a moment in
the second position, still
[Illustration: EXERCISE II.--FIRST POSITION.
[_To face page 80._
[Illustration: EXERCISE II.--SECOND POSITION.
[_To face page 80._
[Illustration: EXERCISE II.--BOTH ARMS TOGETHER.
[_To face page 80._
[Illustration: EXERCISE VIII.
[_To face page 81._
holding the breath, then lower the arms, slowly expelling the
breath, till they are again at the side with shoulders drooped.
Hold the breath out for a moment, and repeat six or eight times.
EXERCISE V.--(Breathing muscles of chest and abdomen.)
Standing erect draw a long breath, inflating first the lower, then
the middle, and lastly the upper part of the chest. Hold the breath
a moment, then expel the air, first emptying the lower, then the
middle and then the upper part of the chest. Hold the breath out
for a moment, and repeat six or eight times, stopping directly
there is any feeling of giddiness.
EXERCISE VI.--(Muscles of the ankle and calf.)
Stand on each foot in turn and with the other pointed in front,
bend the ankle upwards and downwards, and from side to side, and
then in a circling movement, to its full extent, as rapidly as
possible. Repeat about twenty times.
EXERCISE VII.--(Muscles of the knee and thigh.)
Stand on each foot in turn, and flex the knee as smartly as
possible backwards to its full extent. Bring it back, heel down toe
up, to its full stretch. Repeat ten times.
EXERCISE VIII.--(Balancing exercise for muscles of thigh and calf.)
Stand on one foot, and bring the other slowly upwards and forwards
to full extent of the leg, bending the body back to preserve
balance. Draw the leg back till it is reaching out to its full
extent behind the back, leaning forwards at the same time with the
body, and stretching out the arm corresponding to the extended leg
to its full extent. Repeat with each foot half a dozen times. See
Photograph.
EXERCISE IX.--(Muscles of ankle, knee and hip.)
Stand on left foot and turn the right inwards till the toe is at
right angles to the side of the left foot. Then reverse it as
smartly as possible to its full extent so that the heel of the
right foot is touching the side of the left, and the toe pointing
at right angles outwards. Repeat ten times with each foot. See
Photograph.
EXERCISE X.--(For hips and abdomen.) (From _Health and Strength_,
April, 1902.)
Stand straight, heels together, hands on the waist with thumbs to
the back and fingers pointing forwards and downwards. Then keeping
the legs still and the head facing forward all the time, sway the
body round and round, going as far back, as far forward and down,
and as far to the sides as you can. Do this slowly and see that the
abdominal muscles feel a strong play, and make three circles with
the trunk. Then stand still and straight again and stretch the body
as high as you can, but without rising off the feet, so that the
leg muscles have perfect rest. Stretch out and up after every three
circles, and stop the moment the slightest feeling of tiredness
comes.
[If this exercise does not seem to suit the individual, then it may
be preferable to make a swift movement as
[Illustration: EXERCISE IX.--FIRST POSITION.
[_To face page 82._
[Illustration: EXERCISE IX.--SECOND POSITION.
[_To face page 82._
[Illustration: EXERCISE XIII.--FIRST POSITION.
[_To face page 83._
[Illustration: EXERCISE XIII.--SECOND POSITION.
[_To face page 83._
if to pick up objects from the ground first in front of you, then
on one side, then on the other, then above you.]
EXERCISE XI.--(For muscles of the trunk and back.)
Stand firm on both feet all the time, and keeping the head facing
forwards, swing the trunk round first to the left and then to the
right, letting the arms move freely to help the swing. Do not
strain, but try to increase the extent of the turn gradually day by
day. Repeat half a dozen times.
EXERCISE XII.--(For muscles of back and leg.)
Lie flat on the floor, with hands clasped behind the head. Draw
right knee sharply up towards the chest, then kick it back to the
full extent of the leg, stretching out toes as far as they will go.
Do the same with left foot, and repeat ten times.
EXERCISE XIII.--(Neck and trunk and shoulders.)
Stand with feet and knees straight. Then turn the head round with
moderate rapidity as far as it will go to the right, letting the
body follow it. Remain for a moment, shrug the right shoulder, and
revert the position, turning the head as far as possible to the
left. Then shrug the left shoulder. Repeat six times. [With this
exercise too great speed of movement should not be attempted at
first, until the muscles of the neck have become pliant with
exercise. Before long, however, the head can with ease be turned so
far round that the eyes will cover a _circle and a half_.] See
Photograph.
EXERCISE XIV.--(Combined exercise for arms, legs and trunk.)
Stand in an easy position, slightly sideways, the weight on the
left foot. Then take a rapid stride forward with the right foot,
the toe of the left still remaining on the ground, and
simultaneously lunge forward as rapidly as possible with right arm
to its full extent, following it with a forward and downward motion
of the body. Recover smartly to the original position. Do the same
with the left foot and arm, repeating ten or twelve times. Later on
the lunge can be made in other directions as well as straight
forwards.
Now this list of fourteen exercises which we have extracted from a much
larger number will, we believe, be found sufficient to exercise in a
healthy and reasonable manner a very large proportion of the muscles of
the body. They may seem, especially to anyone who has been accustomed to
long exercises with heavy dumb-bells, mere child’s play, but if they are
given a trial, and especially if the utmost rapidity is used in making
those movements where
[Illustration: EXERCISE XIV.
[_To face page 84._]
rapidity is enjoined, they will, we think, be found not unsatisfactory.
Those people who are accustomed to gauge their exercise by the fatigue
which it produces may not, it is true, be pleased with them, but for our
part we do not for a moment believe that fatigue is any criterion of
satisfactory exercise. It is perfectly easy to fatigue oneself in a very
few minutes by unsuitable exercises, just as it is easy for a man
accustomed to walk rapidly to feel real sensations of fatigue if he has
to walk very slowly for half an hour. Yet no one would say that he had
therefore enjoyed more satisfactory exercise. For to use a muscle
wrongly is in itself fatiguing, and for this reason exercises of the
muscles of the arms should be far more rapid than exercises for the
legs, and exercises for the legs in the same way more rapid than those
for the chest and abdomen. It would be out of the question to try to
make the breathing muscles exercise themselves with the rapidity that is
easy to the muscles of the ankle, and in the same way it is useless to
exercise the muscles of the wrist only as fast as it is reasonable to
exercise the muscles of the abdomen. They are adapted for widely
different purposes; use then each for its own.
The advantage which we claim for such exercises is that they give
exercise and do not produce fatigue. Furthermore, they take far less
time than ordinary courses of dumb-bell exercise, they require no
apparatus whatever, they produce briskness of movement, and will keep
the muscles in better condition for games and athletics than do mere
slow strength-producing movements. But we should not for a moment urge a
man who played games regularly to use at any rate all these exercises
on those days when he is playing, for it is certain that some muscles,
if not all, will be quite sufficiently exercised by the game, and thus
it is mere waste of time on his part, and unnecessary expenditure of
energy to add to that which is already sufficient. On the other hand,
most games--at any rate as they are played by most people--will not
exercise all the muscles which even this list covers, and a man might
with advantage exercise those by these means.
With regard to the increase in the number of times each exercise is
done, it is quite impossible to lay down any general rule, since anyone
whose muscles are already accustomed to rapid movement will be able to
increase the exercise more quickly than one who is not; but as a general
guide for everyone it may be said that none of the exercises should be
repeated more than once or twice after the least feeling of fatigue or
aching begins. But far more important than mere repetition is the
rapidity of movement with which one does those that are meant to be
rapid, and it is infinitely better to do such exercises only half the
number of times suggested, with concentration and speed, than twice the
number if they are done slackly or not fully. The first essentials are
to do them correctly and rapidly; the endurance and strength to repeat
them many times with correctness and rapidity will come of their own
accord. But the correctness is also a _sine quâ non_: for it is the
intelligent and faithful obedience of the body to the will which is no
less an object of exercise than the efficiency of the body considered by
itself, and just as to practise these exercises correctly is the
foundation of a good habit, so to practise them incorrectly is the
foundation of a bad one.
For athletes, then, we believe that they will help in a marked degree to
keep the muscles in good tone when there is forced on them a period of
inaction from games. This effect would not be obtainable from dumb-bell
exercises, since the latter for the most part are slow movements which
are not of the least good as practice for games, but (though undoubtedly
strength-giving) if used alone rather prejudicial to speed than
otherwise. And for non-athletic people and athletes alike, they will
help to keep the body in good health, not only because, for reasons
given above, exercise is healthy, but because many of them are specially
devoted to using those large muscle-areas of the body on which the
proper daily working of the system depends, and these are exercised
without risk of straining, whereas to exercise them with heavy
dumb-bells in the hands has before now produced, and will again
produce, injury. Furthermore, the body is far less liable to be attacked
by definite disease if it is in a healthy condition, while also the
daily hardening which it will experience in the system of exposure which
we recommend, will render it considerably less prone to catch cold by
reason of draughts or change of temperatures, which otherwise are often
the immediate causes of chill.
Now, though games are more to be recommended than mere exercise for
those who can afford the time and money for them, inasmuch as the
enjoyment derived from them is greater (the benefit derived being
therefore greater),[3] and all sorts of qualities are called out, which
mere exercises do not demand, it must not be supposed that all games (or
for that matter all exercises) are suitable to all ages and
constitutions. For in the human body speed (as in these exercises) is
naturally developed before strength, and a lad of twenty will beat a man
of forty in a hundred yards’ race, though he has not nearly the same
amount of pure physical force at his disposal. Short and violent
exercises, exercises demanding top speed, or a swift stroke, are natural
to youth, and, broadly speaking, as with advancing years (even though a
man is still in his prime) strength increases, speed somewhat
diminishes. Thus, though exercise and exercises are quite undoubtedly
good for a young boy, it seems by the example of nature herself, that
exercises demanding strength and continued effort are bad. Thus for
children we should never recommend dumb-bell or developer exercises at
all, except with weights and resistances so small that they practically
call forth no extra strength to manipulate, but which serve in so far as
the hand is occupied to fix the child’s attention on what he is doing.
Even in later years strength, or at any rate that sort of strength which
is measured and accompanied by very bulky muscles, not only does not
assist, but even hinders speed of any movement; and though a certain
amount of strength is required for movement of any kind, it is (though
it is possible not to have enough) also possible to have too much of the
wrong sort. Of course, if a man’s physical ambition is limited to
weight-lifting, there is nothing more to be said: let him continually
lift weights. But if it is in the direction either of good health or
athletic excellence, we think he can do better than practise habitually
with dumb-bells, or “grips,” or other strain-producing apparatus.
Finally, exercise in company with others is more entertaining and likely
to be then done both better and more beneficially than exercise
practised alone, and it is with this among other objects that we have
advocated in the chapter on Mind and Morals the formation of city clubs
where both practice-exercises like those given above could be done in
classes, and also such games as squash, badminton, fives, and covered
tennis be played. In the separate volumes which deal with individual
games will be found special practice-exercises for those games, some of
which can take the place of the general exercises given above, since
they exercise the same muscles, but in a way more directly adapted for
the games in question.
CHAPTER IV.
DIET AND STIMULANTS.
Dogmatism on any subject is dangerous: in matters of food it is fatal.
One man’s meat is literally another man’s poison, and because one of the
writers knows that personally he can digest without the slightest
discomfort a heavy supper, sleep the sleep of the just, and rise
cheerful and hungry for breakfast, he would be making a great mistake in
recommending such a course for a dyspeptic person, with a view to the
strengthening of his digestive processes. In fact, if a naturally
dyspeptic person persevered in such a system, this unfortunate scribe
would probably be summoned to attend--with shame and dishonour--a
coroner’s inquest. On the other hand, should the dyspeptic so far win
him over as to make him give what he would call a “fair trial” to a
simple diet, “the only diet” he would say “on which it is possible to
keep fairly well,” he would, if it was persevered with, be probably
asked in a public place what he knew about this suicide. But the moral
of these gloomy reflections is clear enough: namely, that in questions
of eating and drinking and smoking, what is to be ascertained is the
diet which will keep A or B in good health for the proper performance of
a citizen’s duties. Whatever diet (or absence of diet) continues to give
good results after a protracted trial is almost certainly good for the
individual in question. Whether it would be good for another individual
it is impossible to say, but if any one person, even though he lived
exclusively on green cigars and Egyptian mummies, continued to be in his
most excellent health on such a diet, it would be foolish to urge him,
except on the score of expense in the way of import duties, to change
it.
_But the majority of people are not at their best, and know it._ When
they are in hard work which, as far as we can see in the present highly
competitive state of the world, is becoming the normal condition for
man, their bodily health, and in particular their bodily activity,
sensibly declines. Then perhaps there comes a lull, and they rush off
into the country to be out of doors all day, and play games, or shoot or
hunt, and get sensibly better. They have more appetite for food, and as
a natural consequence digest it better, since wholesome appetite is a
fair enough sign-post pointing to the pleasant place called “Eat.” Then
the lull ceases; they go back to work again, with a gradual decline of
appetite. At these cross-roads, so to speak, for the most part they take
the wrong turning, and continue to eat much as before. Horrors ensue.
The fact is that most people when taking a great deal of exercise are
able to digest, and, what is not less important, to assimilate, not only
larger quantities of food than they can assimilate when in full
sedentary work, but a different sort of food. As a rule they know of
only one change of diet, alluded to contemptuously as “Vegetarianism,”
and connected in their minds with huge platefuls of damp cabbage, of
which the most valuable salts have been boiled out and thrown away by an
ignorant cook. They are further “put off” by what appears to most people
preposterous notions about the sin, no less, of eating animal food. In
fact, bad cooking and tactless enthusiasm have hand in hand done their
utmost to ruin the vegetarian cause. To eat damp cabbage can be, by no
conceivable process, good for anybody, and to shun animal food because
it implies death to an animal is a motive which does not appeal to the
majority, who, without examining any possible truth it may contain,
label it a fad. And there is nothing which in the minds of ordinary
people, who most naturally and sensibly do not wish to spend the whole
of their lives in discovering the diet which best suits them, is more
strongly prejudicial to any examination of a new system than to suspect
it of being faddy. They naturally desire a _régime_ of which the
common-sense appeals to them, and the common-sense of that which is
ordinarily called vegetarianism is far to seek. Many people have found
that the amount of meat which they usually eat is not very good for
them: that three flesh meals a day are excessive in the way of animal
food; on the other hand they must have something substituted for the
meat, and they turn to vegetarianism, and perhaps try a meal at some
vegetarian eating-house. One of the present writers tried it. For an
hour or rather less he felt that he would never eat again as long as he
lived, then, almost without transition, he felt that he wished to eat
the whole world round. And he fled back to the fleshpots of Egypt.
But nowadays vegetarianism is studied by certain people in a spirit of
scientific investigation, and its results, rationally arrived at, are
likely to prove of the most permanent value. It is the greatest possible
mistake to suppose that all vegetables and fruits are equally
supporting; some are highly nutritious, others are hardly nutritious at
all, and to load the stomach with immense masses of a food which has a
low nutritious value, in order to get sufficient nutriment, will
probably produce results on health worse even than those from which the
man who found that he was taking excessive quantities of animal food
tried to escape.[4]
Briefly, then, the scientific view of food in general is as follows.
Food has to supply waste of tissue and make repairs.
Food has to supply heat (fuel for the continual combustion of the body)
and a certain amount of fat.
Food--so it is usually asserted and largely believed--has to give the
stomach a certain amount of fibrous matter to supply bulk which will
enable the system, by natural means, to cleanse and flush itself
internally, and throw off the waste for which it has no use, but which
exists in greater or smaller quantities in all foods.
Incidentally, also, food should be of such taste and nature as easily to
excite the saliva, which is almost indispensable to procure digestion.
Now the one great necessity without which we die is proteid, because
proteid supplies (and nothing else in the world supplies) the waste
which daily and hourly goes on in the body. It is present in
conveniently large quantities in all meat foods, which is one of the
main causes of their being eaten, but it is present also in large
quantities in cheese, milk-proteid, grains, nuts, and pulses, though in
certain other fruits and vegetables it is almost completely absent. It
would be practically impossible, for instance, to eat enough cabbages to
supply the necessary amount of pure proteid per diem, which must, and
this is important, not only be swallowed but be digested. On the other
hand, it is easily possible to get enough proteid per diem by a meat
diet, but it is even easier to get enough from a diet of grains, nuts,
pulses, and milk-proteid,[5] provided the right sorts are eaten.
The following abridged table giving the values of certain common
articles of diet both in proteids and also in fattening and heating
products will make this clear.
TABLE OF FOOD VALUES.
(ABRIDGED FROM “FAILURES OF VEGETARIANISM.”)
+------------------------+----------+-------+-----------------+--------+
| Foods--uncooked, | | | | |
| unless otherwise | Proteid. | Fat. | Carbo-hydrates. | Salts. |
| stated. | | | | |
+------------------------+----------+-------+-----------------+--------+
| Beef (with moderate | | | | |
| amount of fat) | 20. | 1.5 | ... | 1.3 |
| Mutton (with moderate | | | | |
| amount of fat) | 14.5 | 19.5 | ... | 0.8 |
| Pork | 12. | 26.2 | ... | 1.1 |
| Fresh fish | 10.5 | 2.5 | ... | 1. |
| Milk | 2.3 | 4. | 4.5 | 0.7 |
| Plasmon | 69. | ... | ... | 8.5 |
| Cheddar cheese | 33.4 | 26.8 | ... | 3.9 |
| Eggs (white) | 12.6 | 0.25 | ... | ... |
| Eggs (yolk) | 16.2 | 31.75 | ... | ... |
| Hovis bread | 9.9 | 1.6 | 42.3 | 1.2 |
| Wholemeal bread | 6.3 | 1.2 | 44.8 | 1.2 |
| (“Manhu” is similar) | | | | |
| White bread | 6.5 to 3 | 1.0 | 51.2 | 1.0 |
| Boiled rice | 5.0 | 0.1 | 41.9 | 0.3 |
| Macaroni | 10.89 | 0.45 | 76.05 | 0.64 |
| Dried peas | 21.0 | 1.8 | 55.4 | 2.6 |
| Lentils | 23.0 | 2.0 | 58.4 | 2.7 |
| Haricots | 23.0 | 2.3 | 55.8 | 3.2 |
| Potatoes | 1.2 | 0.1 | 19.1 | 0.9 |
| Turnips | 0.9 | 0.15 | 5.0 | 0.8 |
| Onions | 1.6 | 0.3 | 6.3 | 0.6 |
| Cabbage | 1.8 | 0.4 | 5.8 | 1.3 |
| Tomatoes | 1.3 | 0.2 | 5.0 | 0.76 |
| Cucumbers | 0.81 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 0.4 |
| Apples | 0.4 | ... | 12.5 | 0.4 |
| Plums | 1.0 | ... | 14.8 | 0.5 |
| Cherries | 0.8 | ... | 8.9 | 0.5 |
| Strawberries | 1.0 | ... | 6.3 | 0.7 |
| Bananas | 1.5 to 3 | ... | 22.9 | 0.9 |
| Lemons | 1.0 | ... | 8.3 | 0.5 |
| Dried dates | 4.4 | ... | 65.7 | 1.5 |
| Dried figs | 5.5 | ... | 62.8 | 2.3 |
| Chestnuts | 10.1 | 10.0 | ... | 2.7 |
| Walnuts | 15.6 | 62.6 | 7.4 | 2.9 |
| Sweet almonds | 24.0 | 54.0 | 10.0 | 3.0 |
| Cocoa bean | 6.3 | 50.44 | 4.20 | 2.75 |
+------------------------+----------+-------+-----------------+--------+
It is obvious then, that as far as the theoretical reasons for eating
food at all are concerned, it is perfectly easy to obtain all the
essentials for support without touching animal food, and without in any
way loading the stomach with unnecessary bulk; and leaving out of the
question, for the present, the economical advantage of adopting these
simple foods, there is one enormous advantage which they possess for
many. These are they who, especially in town life, and when they are not
able to take the requisite amount of exercise, suffer chronically from
slight biliousness or congested liver, and the depression attendant
thereon, who feel sleepy or fatigued when in better health they would
feel neither. Their ailments may rarely or never amount to what they
would call “an attack,” but habitually they are slightly clogged. Now in
nine cases out of ten this feeling is due to the presence of uric acid
in the body, which is produced in larger quantities than the system,
without the aid of daily perspiration, which gets rid of acids to a
large extent through the skin, can throw off. This uric acid is a
product of waste within the body, and the foods which cause it are (to a
much larger extent than all others) flesh foods.
Many people know this without knowing it; in other words, many men who
have an attack of biliousness, lumbago, or gout (all direct results of
the presence of uric acid in the body), at once cut off, even without
consulting a doctor, their daily consumption of flesh. But then their
ignorance makes them suffer, for they most likely in the curtailment of
flesh-food do not take enough proteid, with the effect that after a day
or two of such treatment they feel lowered. Naturally: they have been
starving. And the lowered feeling they put down to the absence of
flesh-food, whereas it is chiefly the absence of proteid from which they
are suffering. They could easily have avoided this by eating instead of
flesh some of the fleshless foods which are valuable in proteid, and
they can--humanly speaking--if the abstinence from flesh-foods, as is
almost invariably the case, relieves their attack, guard against such
attacks in the future, by a diet, complete or modified, of the kind
which has relieved them. But, and this is highly important, it is a
fatal mistake not to take enough proteid, and not to remember that it is
easily possible to eat heavy meals without taking enough. Four or five
ounces per diem of proteid, not only swallowed but digested, is said to
be the average required.
Now there are many people in excellent health who live in the ordinary
manner _i.e._, on a varied diet including meat, and as long as they are
well, there seems to be no reason, except to be humane and to save the
money they spend in food--and that may be a great inducement--why they
should try a new diet when their present one suits them well, except
that, for all they can tell, another diet might suit them better. At the
same time there are certainly many people who are perfectly aware that
they have periodical attacks of liver or biliousness directly traceable
to diet, and many others who put themselves down as having chronically
bad digestions, with which any food is continually liable to disagree.
It is to these particularly that a trial of the simpler foods is
recommended, whether they are adopted _in toto_, or used to modify
existing diet. Similarly, also, the simpler foods are recommended as
worth a trial by athletes who are in training for some special event, to
whom either economy is an object (for a most varied diet of simpler
foods can be had at a daily cost of less than a shilling), or whom the
present heavy though wholesome meals do not suit. Furthermore, it is
quite possible, as we said, that even those who consider themselves well
might be still better without flesh-foods.
Another effect of this simpler food diet is that it has been found by
trial to lessen greatly the desire for stimulants. Why this should be so
is a question for physiologists, and cannot be discussed here. It may,
however, be taken as a fact. And those who have tried the diet fairly
(and one of the present writers has lived on simple foods--_i.e._,
scarcely touched meat in any form for some years) find that abstinence
from meat directly increases the activity and promptitude, not only of
the body, but of the mind, while both mind and body are capable of doing
far harder and better work than before. The simpler food diet by itself
will probably be found adequate to reduce the excessive uric acid in the
body to practically nil--_i.e._, natural means will be sufficient to
cope with it; but it is useful to remember that alkalis may also be used
as a preventive or cure.
Another alteration in diet, which we give with the reiterated proviso
that it may not suit everybody, is the habit of having no breakfast, or
if any, only a fruit breakfast. A very great number of people do not
feel hungry immediately on rising, and in America this plan is largely
adopted even by those who have to start the day with severe physical
work. For those who do feel hungry on rising it seems most probable that
breakfast is indicated, but on the other hand it is more than possible
that for those who do not, breakfast is not indicated. And to eat a
typical English breakfast, consisting probably of fish and meat, washed
down with tea--which cannot be recommended as a fluid likely to help
digestion. When one does not want it, is really to require a daily
miracle from the inside if one is so unreasonable as to demand that it
shall dispose of these things without more ado. Similarly, to limit
one’s eating to two meals a day has been found by many to be a valuable
aid to health, though others, on the other hand, find that the quantity
they really feel that they require, if they only eat twice, is apt to
overload the stomach.
Again, it is probably not good for anybody to take violent exertion of
the body, or do headwork immediately after or before any meal. With many
people it is unfortunately impossible to prevent this; a man’s only free
time for his exercise may be immediately after lunch, or he may have to
continue his deskwork till immediately before. In such cases this must
be taken as a necessary evil; for exercise even immediately after a meal
will probably be better for a man than none at all, while not to work up
to the meal may mean neglect of work, which is more culpable than
indigestion. For such, a light meal is strongly recommended, and in
particular a meal as free of flesh-foods as the eater can manage.
It is of the greatest importance that whatever diet is found to suit the
individual taste, this diet should be eaten slowly and thoroughly
masticated, otherwise the most suitable and wholesome food may both
disagree with the eater, and lose most of its nourishing value. Nuts are
a good example of this--they have an odious reputation for
indigestibility which is quite unfounded, for they are perfectly easy of
digestion to most people if only they are very thoroughly masticated.
But swallowed in large pieces, in any pieces in fact except the
smallest, they are exceedingly indigestible. Similarly, also, many nuts
are extremely rich in proteids (the chestnut, for instance, containing
14·6 per cent., the peanut[6] upwards of 28 per cent. of proteid), but
in order to _get at_ the proteid they must be bitten almost to powder
and thoroughly mixed with saliva. Otherwise they are not distributed
(_i.e._, digested), but are passed through the body in the same way as
chests of gold (securely fastened up) can be sent by train, so to speak,
through a country without enriching it. It is of equal importance
thoroughly to masticate all starchy foods (bread, potatoes, &c.), so
that the saliva may penetrate them and begin the work of digestion in
the mouth, and it is largely for this reason that doctors recommend
toast or biscuits to dyspeptic patients rather than bread, because it is
impossible to swallow crisp toast without properly biting it, whereas
lumps of soft bread can be swallowed without actual pain. On this point
we adopt a fearless dogmatism, and assert that it is good for nobody to
swallow unmasticated food, both because the act of mastication is part
of the digestive process, and because mastication itself renders the
nutritive elements of the food accessible to the stomach. Thus less bulk
of food is needed, there is less waste, and the digestive juices of the
stomach are not, so to speak, called on to make violent assaults on what
they receive, to behave like burglars, wresting what is valuable from
the food. The burglary is done by the teeth, which, by the way, seem to
be kept in better repair by mere mastication than by any other means,
and the energy otherwise used by the stomach remains undrawn upon.
Also, if one bites food well it is far easier to know correctly when one
has eaten enough; lumps of food bolted are for the time being “locked
up”; it is uncertain whether they are going to satisfy hunger or not.
Even if unnutritious they will produce a feeling of satiety for the time
being, and an hour later they may be found wanting. A certain amount of
bulk, as we have said, is needed, but beyond that the richer a food is
in the desired qualities of power of repair, and of supply of energy,
the better is that food, provided it is easily digestible. And its full
value cannot be brought into play, especially in the case of starhy
foods, without thorough mastication.[7]
As to drink and stimulants more regard if possible must be paid to what
we have called “the personal equation” than even in matters of food.
Excess of everything--for such is the implication of the word
itself--must be bad for everybody, but there is no earthly foundation
for supposing that what is excess for one person injures another in the
very least. A shower of rain ruins a picture-hat in a few moments: the
same shower does not practically injure a locomotive engine at all, and
is absolutely good for sprouting corn. Alcohol for instance, if indulged
in at all by one man, will assuredly lead either to excess or to
inordinate craving for it, while another man will drink wine at lunch
and dinner for years without ever feeling the slightest desire to
increase his usual quantity. What he drinks, again, would hopelessly
disagree with, or perhaps intoxicate another man, while it seems as far
as we can judge to suit him; he would perhaps even be definitely less
well without it. It is on this point that preachers of total abstinence,
just like vegetarians, are often their own worst foes. They seem to
regard the process of fermentation (a natural one after all) as
productive of something which is in itself immoral. Drunkenness, of
course, is a vice; we all know that; but so, and certain teetotallers
seem to forget this, is gluttony. They each of them turn man into a
brute beast, though what many teetotallers would look approvingly at as
“a good hearty meal” appears to us to partake fully as much of the
nature of debauchery as does the drinking of a bottle of champagne at
dinner. The question of drinking, in fact, seems to us one that each man
must settle for himself, by finding out experimentally whether he needs
stimulant or not. Probably the healthier he is the less he needs it, and
to spur a horse that is already going as well as the rider has any
right to expect is both a cruelty and a false use of energy. It seems
certain, also, that most people who take stimulants at all take more
than they really need, partly because of the pleasant effect of
stimulant in the heightened vividity it gives (leaving anything like
drunkenness out of the question), and because of the taste of alcoholic
beverages, which nine out of ten people find most palatable. Here again
preachers of total abstinence put forward an argument so silly that it
is scarcely worth combating (were it not for the fact that it is so
often repeated), when they say that what we have called “heightened
vividity” is the thin end of intoxication. It is nothing of the kind.
Food itself is a stimulant as well as a nutriment; a mutton chop or a
welsh rarebit when one is hungry gives heightened vividity; so also does
whisky and soda.
But, and here we tread more sensible ground, it must be remembered that
alcohol is _not_ a nourishing stimulant, and that its effect quickly
wears off, leaving reaction, however slight, in everybody. Nor must we
keep out of the question what the continued effects of alcohol are. Its
bad results may not be apparent for a long time. In certain cases there
are bad results; in certain other cases apparently there are none.
Authorities on training are universally agreed that very little, if any,
should be taken when the training has begun; and they are unquestionably
right, because the object of training is to produce before a certain
date or during a certain period a specimen of manhood at its highest
possible physical level, strung up and maintained at concert pitch. To
do this the whole structure must be sound, and stimulant then appears to
be of the nature of a temporary prop, which has again and again to be
set up afresh. Also, repeatedly applied stimulant followed by repeated
reaction is not ideal.
The same remarks apply to the ordinary individual in a less degree; for
though he should aim at ideal health, he does not want the sort of
health which a boat-race crew want. In fact, in a necessarily sedentary
life it would be exceedingly inconvenient to him; for to maintain it it
seems necessary to have hard daily exercise, quantities of open air, and
hours which are practically impossible for the ordinary man who has to
do his daily work. An abstemious man who has been accustomed to alcohol
may easily, if he drops its use altogether, find himself continuing to
desire it, at an expense of nervous fretting which will cost him more
than the possible gain in health may be worth. But when any man who
takes alcohol finds himself desiring it more and more and in increased
quantities, if even at one meal, let us say, he is unable to get it, and
finds himself fretting for it, we have no hesitation in begging him at
whatever cost to drop it altogether and at once. We do not say he is on
the high road to become a drunkard, but somewhere ahead of him there
easily may be that high road. We should further advise everybody to try
at any rate what is the effect of drinking alcohol, let us say, once a
day only. Of course, the difficulty which faces most people is what to
drink instead; and, as far as pleasure goes, the difficulty is a real
one. We cordially recommend total abstainers to try to find a solution.
Various non-alcoholic drinks have from time to time been sedulously
advertised, but most of them are abhorrent to the ordinary palate, being
sickly sweet.
Here comes in the question of the general regulation of drinks, which,
theoretically, we are afraid, is a most uncomfortable gospel. For the
effect of drinking cold things during a meal, except in very small
quantities, is without doubt digestively criminal: since the result of
pouring cold aspersions into the stomach while it is busy with digestion
is to lower its temperature at the time when heat is needed, and also to
weaken and water down the digestive juices.[8] There is no getting over
this: long drinks on hot days at lunch are not to be recommended. But
even here the baffled voluptuary may find a way out which is not so
disagreeable. He may by all means have his long drink half an hour
before lunch, or at a rather long interval after. If he choose after, he
will find, especially if he has eaten fruit at lunch, that he does not
want it, and that though the satisfaction of a real throatful of cold
liquid is denied him, he will have taken during lunch quite sufficient
liquid to satisfy his thirst. But that is the best we can do for him,
and we will not insult him by saying that plenty of hot water or hot
water and lemon is delicious, and so much nicer than whisky and soda
iced. For it is not nearly so nice.
Finally, with regard to that other soother and strengthener, tobacco, we
have no sympathy with extremists, and we assert that the moderate use of
tobacco will not and cannot reduce the ordinary constitution to a wreck
in ten years, while in many cases it is absolutely beneficial, at least
for the time, as a nerve-sedative. Many people, one of the present
writers is one, finds that he can work more steadily and with less
restlessness when smoking. But, and here is a warning, if, after a
spell of hard work of three or four hours, you find the ash-tray a pile
of cigarette ends, most of them probably smoked only half-consciously,
take steps. Put the box of cigarettes in another room, so that you have
to get up in order to procure one. Then, if you find yourself wondering
whether it is worth while getting one, you may be quite certain that you
do not really want it. Furthermore, tobacco is not nearly so insidious
as alcohol; it is perfectly easy for every one who smokes to know
whether it suits him. Many people it does not suit at all, and most of
them know it. Here we should recommend all smokers to try the effect of
abstinence for a couple of days, or at any rate of abstinence up till
dinner-time. This would separate the sheep from the goats: many--the
present writer is one again--will find that apparently no good effects
ensue, and a certain restlessness is the only result. Others will find
themselves distinctly better both in energy and in accuracy of eye and
keenness of perception. These we should recommend to drop it altogether,
and for their comfort the writer can assure them that, having tried this
experiment himself, he found that the craving for it lasted only a few
days, and that during those few days it was always possible to
neutralise it for periods of an hour or so, by chewing an ordinary dried
camomile-flower (2d. per ounce), the extreme and rather pleasant
bitterness of which renders the thought of tobacco literally abhorrent
as long as the taste of it remains in the mouth.
But here again strict training for a special event almost, if not quite,
unanimously demands a total abstinence from tobacco from the beginning
of training. The use of this we confess ourselves utterly unable to
see, since we do not believe at all that, as in the case of drink, to
take a little necessarily means a desire for more, but rather the
extinguishing of the desire for the time being. The case is, in fact, in
our judgment, a parallel to the shower of rain on the locomotive: it is
inconceivable almost that it should do so much harm as its
uncompromising opponents assert, and in many cases we believe its very
moderate use would save a certain amount of restlessness, which in
present systems of training is far more common than it ought to be. It
is not in fact rare, whereas it should be not only rare, but almost
unknown. For training is supposed to be the ideal way of living with a
view to complete physical fitness, but under most systems severe
training entails an almost total cessation of brain work, while it does
not imply a total cessation of mental worry. Men often get fidgetty and
stale before their weeks of training are nearly over, and this is due
partly, no doubt, to the absurd system of training a whole crew, for
instance, as if they were identical specimens of the same man, but also
to the very fact that brain work is practically tabooed, just as tobacco
is tabooed. Neither, in strict moderation, we believe, particularly
brain-work, can possibly be as bad as they are frequently accused of
being, and both might very possibly be found a sedative for a body that
is bursting with condition. Besides, if training unfits a man for
brain-work there is something probably wrong with the system of
training, whereas if any brain-work unfits a man for training, it is
seriously to be considered whether it is worth while to train at
all.[9]
For the right training, so we believe, is that which shall enable a
man--this is no fanciful idea, but one that has and is now being put
into practice by both the writers--to be capable of hard brain-work
during the whole time that he is putting his body into the best possible
condition both for general health and also for a special event. The
_mens sana_ should not be left out of the _corpore sano_, and health
consists in the efficiency not of one at the cost of the other, but of
both to the benefit of each. Finally, with regard to special training,
we believe that it cannot possibly fail to be injurious to a man to go
out of severe training with the completeness and suddenness with which
many do when the event is over. After a training of weeks, the desire
for certain foods and stimulants, if they were in themselves unhealthy,
should have ceased, the body in fact should have been brought into such
a condition that it would feel by now a natural repugnance for them. If,
then, this repugnance, or at any rate absence of desire is not felt,
either they were not unhealthy, and might have been allowed in
moderation, or the resumption of them with that extreme freedom--not to
say excess--which marks the end of training, is only compassed with a
certain effort. Is it worth while?
Finally, also, with regard to general training, the acquirement that is
of really good health, which is within the reach of the majority, and
incumbent upon all to attempt, a fair trial of simpler foods is
recommended to all who habitually feel slightly indisposed when working
hard, and who are cut off to a large extent from regular exercise, and
is suggested, if only on the ground of expense, to many others.
Similarly, a diminution in stimulants is recommended to all who
habitually take them, in order that they may find for themselves what
the effect (on themselves only) is. Similarly, also, with regard to
smoking: for the concensus of professional trainers is dead against it,
as a foe both to eye and endurance. Some, we believe, will not find it
so, but anyone may, and very likely the majority will. In any case, it
will hurt nobody to drop it for a week or two.
CHAPTER V.
WATER, HEAT AND LIGHT.
It is not our intention to speak in any special manner about prescribed
remedies for different ailments, since our concern is with the general
standard of health and fitness rather than with temporary ailments, for
which in many cases some special treatment is the most convenient
remedy. But our object being to show how by a proper mode of life the
body may be put into a state of health in which it is the least likely
to need any help from drugs or special treatment, it would be clearly
out of place, and imply a want of faith on our part in our present
system if we thought it in the least necessary to talk much about
remedial treatments. But there are certain simple applications of water
and heat, which though they may be adopted remedially, are yet part of a
rational and healthy mode of life--that is to say, they can both be used
by anyone suffering from some definite complaint, and at the same time
belong to the daily and regular _régime_ of the thoroughly healthy man.
The different sorts of baths, for instance, are, if rightly and
scientifically used, both remedial, and will form part of the daily
treatment of the healthy body.
As far as concerns the upper classes, at any rate, there is probably no
race in the world which nowadays[10] uses so much water as the
Anglo-Saxon; but our manner of using it is, to a large extent,
luxurious rather than practical, sensuous rather than sensible. The
morning cold bath, for instance, which some Frenchman the other day
wittily called the “Englishman’s castle,” is, though eminently healthy
and invigorating for some people, neither healthy nor invigorating for
all, and cleansing for none except in a slight degree. The cold bath,
indeed, is a sort of fetish; it is regarded as a piece of ritual
belonging to the scheme of things which “makes us Englishmen what we
are,” and to criticise the use of cold baths is something like “taking
the breeks off a Hielander.” But for the sake of those thousands who
have cold baths because it is their habit, and feel rather chilled and
dispirited than otherwise by the process, it is perhaps worth while to
say a few words about cold and other baths.
Water hot or cold, externally applied, has three main functions: (i.) to
cleanse, (ii.) to promote or equalise circulation, (iii.) to invigorate
and harden. It is mainly to its excellent effects with regard to the
third of these functions that the complete cold plunge owes its
popularity; for nothing--_given that the heart is strong, and the liver
not prone to sluggishness_--is more delightfully exhilarating than the
sudden thrill of cold water when one is either warm from hours in bed,
or hot from violent exercise. But it must be remembered that it is
distinctly not given to everyone to be sufficiently robust to be able to
indulge in it. There are some people who are clearly benefited--as far
as we can see--by it; there are many who are not injured by it, and can
continue to take it for the sake of the pleasurable sensation it
produces; but there are also many who are injured by it, who run a risk
anyhow in its use. For the shock and contrast of it is a shock: a sudden
drag is put on the racing heart, a sudden check is given to the hot
open-pored skin. It is exactly that which is pleasant: it is that also
which may be dangerous. Luckily the test of its desirability, or at any
rate, harmlessness in any special case, is easy to apply, and if anyone
feels chilled after cold bathing, or finds that after it the feet and
hands are a little numb and cold, with perhaps a loss of colour under
the nails, it is fairly certain that he or she has not the circulation
which can be benefited by a cold bath; but may be hurt by it. Or if
anyone finds it necessary to make a very vigorous use of the rough
towel afterwards in order to get warm again, the cold bath probably does
not suit him. Again, in some it produces a certain torpidity of the
liver, equally easily indicated; here, also, we have one of Nature’s
clear danger-flags waving us off.
The cold bath suits and probably benefits most of those who do not feel
these dispiriting after-effects, and the reason for it is obvious. The
cold water checks the circulation momentarily; it is literally a cold
sponge on the heart, and it momentarily drives away the blood from the
skin. But then, if the bather has good natural reaction, this momentary
chill will be succeeded by a fresh assertion of his vigour; the heart
momentarily checked will, combatively, reassert itself, the blood will
rush back to the skin vessels from which it has been momentarily driven,
and the exhilaration of the cold shock will be succeeded by a fresh
exhilaration of tingling vigour. But in any case a cold bath should not
be taken by anyone already cold or chilled; it is because the body is
warm, the heart beating fully, and the circulation vigorous that the
subsequent reaction is vigorous. But to take a cold bath when one is
cold is to demand an effort from something which should be not checked
but encouraged.
As a cleanser, however, the cold bath is, we regret to say, hopelessly
incompetent. For to clean the skin properly it is not sufficient to
clean the mere surface of the skin. The pores have to be opened and the
dirt and waste products, ordinarily invisible to the eye, taken from
them. Now cold water cannot do this, since one of its main effects is to
close the pores. But if anyone wants to see what happens when the pores
are thoroughly opened and cleaned, let him take a Turkish bath and be
well rubbed afterwards. What was ordinarily invisible becomes
offensively visible, and though much of what comes away is skin itself,
it is skin anyhow of a certain colour, and that colour is neither white
nor pink, nor brown, but black. And the colouring matter of that
is--dirt.
Now very hot water has in one respect the same immediate function as
very cold water; it tightens and closes the skin, and a short very hot
bath is as invigorating and bracing as a cold one, and may be used with
pleasure and effect by those who are not naturally suited to the cold.
But after a very short time, if one remains in a hot bath, the opposite
effect begins. The heat will now open the pores of the skin, and, as the
water soaks in, the skin is again relaxed, and the hot bath becomes the
cleanser. For the first few moments, however, the opposite effect takes
place; the skin is braced and tightened, and thus we find that many of
the Japanese, for instance, and some athletes in America, use a short
hot bath as we naturally use a cold bath, for an invigorator and
hardener, and to close the pores of the skin. It is this use of it that
we recommend to those who cannot stand a cold bath.
The hot bath, then, will supply the invigorating functions of the cold,
if it is really hot and is not too long. In the same way both it and
warm baths supply the cleansing functions which are wanting in the cold
bath, and the combination of the two--_i.e._, a hot or warm bath for
purposes of cleansing followed by a cold douche or cold sponging, is
perhaps the most perfect application of water in all its uses that we
know, and contains the same principles as the Turkish bath. Those who
have bathrooms will, of course, find this method easy enough to manage,
but those who have not can get a perfectly adequate substitute in a
large basin of cold water with which they will sponge themselves after
the ordinary hip-bath or sponging-tin in their rooms and while still
standing in it. Those, however, whom the cold bath does not suit, would
be wise to use only cool, not cold water, after the hot bath. A further
benefit of this combination of hot and cold water lies in the hardening
effect which the change of temperature produces on the skin, for it
accustoms it to sudden changes of temperature, and renders it far less
liable to catch cold. This, in view of the number of colds that people
certainly catch by getting chilled after being hot, is a great
advantage.
The best, as also far the pleasantest water to wash in is soft water,
approaching as nearly as possible to pure or distilled water, which
from its purity and freedom from suspended mineral matter is more eager,
so to speak, to take dirt, etc., into solution--that is to say, to wash
it off. But distilled water is expensive; rain water, which comes
nearest to it, not always to be had; while in chalky districts the water
is hard. This hardness may, however, be taken off by the addition of a
little oatmeal, or soda, or bath salts, which it will be found give the
water the advantages of soft water; soap, for instance, lathers much
more readily in it, and thus its efficiency as a cleanser is increased.
Hard water also, if continually used, certainly has a sort of drying and
unpleasant effect on delicate skins, making them less supple and
elastic, and diminishing their power of natural healthy action. The
remedy mentioned above largely alleviates this.
With regard to the third of the main functions of water--namely, to
promote and equalise circulation, this effect, though obtained from a
complete bath (as, for instance, a hot bath when one is chilled) is more
particularly to be got from partial baths. Many people, for instance,
suffer from cold feet and hands, and such know how unsatisfactory is the
effect, when working, for instance, on a cold day, of warming the hands
at the fire; for this relief is hardly more than momentary, and as soon
as the, mere surface heat obtained is exhausted, the hands are just
exactly as cold as they were before. But a remedy far more satisfactory
in its effects and just as simple lies at the nearest hot and cold-water
taps, and anyone who tries the effect of letting the hot water run over
his hands for a few moments followed by the cold water (combining the
two in exactly the same way as suggested for the complete bath, but
repeating the process a few times) and then drying them thoroughly with
a little friction, will quite certainly find the need of constant
excursions to the fire much curtailed. For this is a warming on sound
principles--the faulty circulation in the hands is remedied, the blood
is stimulated to flow there naturally, and in consequence the effect is
far more lasting than the momentary relief of the external heat from the
blaze.
In the same way with cold feet, though it would be extravagant and
foolish to recommend any busy man to put in his office a hot and a cold
foot-bath, into which in the presence of his admiring clerks he should
in the middle of the morning dip his feet, yet many will find the habit
of cold feet greatly reduced if at the morning bath (whether they have a
hot bath or a cold) they apply first hot then cold water to their feet.
Again, at night cold feet are a definite and common cause of insomnia,
which many unwisely remedy by heaping the bedclothes over them till they
restore heat to the feet by immoderate clothing over the whole body. We
have suggested in the chapter on sleep the expedient of an extra
coverlet over the feet, and the hot bottle is another remedy. But there
are many to whom the hot bottle is of a gruesome nature; if it is of
earthenware there is the collision with the toe sometime during the
night, while if it is of india-rubber there is something clammy and
snail-like about it when it has grown cold. The far more thorough and
satisfactory system for any confirmed sufferer, because it tends
directly to improve the circulation in the feet, and to harden them by
the change of temperature, is the hot foot-bath, succeeded by cold
sponging and rubbing before going to bed, or after going to bed if there
is insomnia. This is particularly efficacious if repeated a time or
two. The tingling warmth, due to the restoration of circulation, is far
more beneficial and pleasant than the unwilling haling down of the blood
to the feet, as it were, by means of a hot water bottle.
In more directly remedial aspects, we may just allude to the value of
wet-packs for various parts of the body, a common and excellent instance
of which is a cold compress (covered with flannel) round the throat as a
cure for sore throat, or cold water bandages (also covered with flannel)
for local sprains or inflammations. Such things, however, border on
medical questions, and though excellent and simple remedies, are of too
specialised a character to be more than alluded to.
Lying half-way, as it were, between the agents of water and heat comes
the Turkish bath, that solacer in the life of many city men, who but
for it would undoubtedly, in the conditions under which they live,
become confirmed dyspeptics. By it, in a short time, the effects which
exercise has on the skin are produced; by it also, if it is followed, as
it should be, by rubbing and massage, actual (though passive) exercise
is obtained. Thus it counteracts to a great extent what we have before
called the “acidity” of city-life, due to its general lack of exercise,
and the tendency it often produces to over-eat in proportion to the
exercise taken. But frequent Turkish baths, though an excellent
substitute for exercise, an excellent corrective for that which
advertisements elegantly call “errors of diet,” and even an excellent
adjunct to exercise, should be taken as a _faute de mieux_, except in
the case perhaps of very corpulent people, who find it, rightly, almost
essential to keep down the excess of fat. For while the heat produces
about the same effect on the skin as would heat derived from physical
exertion, and while massage produces about the same effect on the
muscles as does physical exercise, yet the absence of fresh air in this
bath is a large defect; though, it is true, it is to a certain extent
compensated by the fact that the whole body is exposed to the air for a
considerable time. But considered as treatment, it is artificial rather
than natural; and though certainly the skin and general health of men
employed in a Turkish bath as _masseurs_ is in excellent condition, yet
the excessive heat (excessive, that is, in respect of the temperatures
that the human body seems naturally adapted to encounter) is probably in
the long run somewhat trying to the system, while the cold plunge
immediately after (to many the best part of the bath) is distinctly bad
for those for whom cold baths are bad. But as a substitute for
exercise, and a general means of health to sedentary and city-workers,
it is probably the best yet contrived. Everyone, however, should rest
well after it, and lie in the cooling-room for at least half an hour,
since the bath itself is violent, so to speak, and demands recuperative
measures, and also because after a long exposure in the hot room even
the cold douche will not at once restore firmness to the skin. But with
this precaution taken the bath is not only an excellent remedy for
colds, but also an excellent preventive against them, by reason mainly
of the hardening effect which the sudden change of the temperature
produces. As a cleanser, finally, the Turkish bath is quite unrivalled.
Of late years physicians and others, both here and in other countries,
notably Denmark, Germany, and America, have accepted and striven to
bring within the range of practical therapeutics the incalculably
health-giving and remedial power of heat and light. This subject will be
touched on in another chapter in connection with the exposure of the
body to the air, while part of it is too special (as, for instance, the
treatment of lupus with the violet rays of the spectrum) to be more than
alluded to. The principle of it all is that light is as tonic to the
body of a man as it is to a plant, and that just as a plant is sickly
and pale if given insufficient light, so the body if stinted in this
becomes weakly and inefficient, a cellar-grown plant. Following this
clue, experiment has established beyond doubt that for anæmia of certain
kinds the best possible remedy is exposure to heat and light, and in
Germany there is more than one sun-cure for this, the course of
treatment being that patients pass hours in the sun every day with
practically no clothes on. Here in England, and especially in London,
such treatment is seldom possible, the two great drawbacks being lack of
sun and lack of privacy[11], and in consequence artificial light has
been resorted to, not as being better than sunlight, but as the best
substitute for it. Here the body is exposed to a violent illumination of
electric light (the eyes and head being protected), and is given a
light-bath in the same way as a Turkish bath gives a purely heat bath.
Incidentally, it is true, the bath of electric light is extremely hot (a
temperature far above that of the ordinary Turkish bath being reached
without inconvenience or danger), but the main object is to administer
the tonic of light, and of that which light becomes when it has passed
through the surface-skin. Of its extraordinary effects in cases of
anæmia, for instance, it is outside our province to speak, but in a
modified form, _i.e._, by exposure when possible of the body to
sunlight, and the constant and unvarying desirability of living in light
rooms, much of its beneficial effects can be enjoyed, and should be, by
everyone. Indeed, to take the long continued effect of light, not on an
individual but on a race, how much of the gaiety of the southern nations
may perhaps be directly due to sunshine? Certainly “a gloomy house,” or
“a gloomy room,” is gloomy in more senses than one, for instinctively
light affects the spirits; it is tonic and invigorating to body and mind
alike, and ten minutes of exposure of the whole body to the sun,
fantastic as it may sound, is as great a dispeller of shadows as is the
sun itself.
It is with this modified form of sun-bath (not because the sun-bath, as
a treatment, is anything but admirable, but because it is in treatment
of disease that it is mainly used) that we have to deal. Everyone knows
how invigorating it is to have only the face and hands exposed to the
sun, a twentieth part of the body, that is to say, given the sun-bath,
not as a medicine, but as a sustainer of general health. Multiply this
by twenty then: instead of twenty minutes in the open air, expose the
whole body, if possible, when dressing, to direct sun-rays by an open
window; let the fresh air and the sun “have their sweet way.” Sunlight,
it is sadly true, is not always available, but light is better than no
light, and instead of hastening to dress after the bath in the morning,
throw the windows wide, and for as long as may be (though taking a
feeling of chilliness as a danger signal of Nature, indicating clothes)
let your body drink in light and air. If you are of imperfect
circulation, get warm first by a hot-bath and exercise, but remember
that as long as you are warm, there is no conceivable danger of catching
cold, and that on the first hint of cold you are almost certainly in
time to dress. Also the endurance of exposure increases rapidly, and
endurance of exposure is one of the first requisites of serene health,
of the health that no more bothers itself about danger of catching cold
than the enviable slumberer spoken of in the chapter on sleep bothers
himself about getting to sleep.
No wonder the sun in Greek times was the god Apollo, the young god of
health and beauty, of all that keeps men young and vigorous, of all that
keeps them sane and efficient. No wonder, also, that from time
immemorial the sun has been worshipped as the supreme god, for from
what else but his light comes growth and health? There he is every day
(or at any rate on some days) marching slowly for our behoof across a
beneficent heaven, and we are like children who clench their teeth when
the doctor comes, rather than show their tongue, if we strive by awnings
and parasols, and God knows what infamous devices, to shut out that
humane physician. Gentlemen, “The Sun.”
“Air and light are essential to the development of the higher forms
of animal and vegetable life in full vigour and perfection. The
lowest organisms--fungi and bacilli and bacteria whose office in
nature appears to be to prey upon and hasten the decomposition of
their superiors in the scale of life--love, like other evil things,
darkness and close dwellings. Bright sunlight (the most potent and
valuable of all light) and fresh air (by oxygen the portion of food
used as fuel is burnt, and heat and all forms of energy evolved,
and oxygen is required for the changing and removal of waste) are
as inimical to them as they are beneficial to the more perfect
forms above them. The action of light is known with less precision
than that of oxygen. It appears, however, to be essential to the
perfect formation of the red cells of the blood--its most vital
constituents. Persons who are deprived of light grow pale and
bloodless. Young women brought from the country as servants or shop
girls, and kept in cellar kitchens or dark work-rooms, notoriously
suffer in this way. Miners also are a pallid, anæmic class. The
want of fresh air has something to do with the result no doubt; yet
patients in a well-lighted hospital ward appear to recover more
quickly, as a rule, than those in darker rooms equally well
ventilated. [Compare the interesting statistics collected in St.
Petersburg by Sir James Wylie.] Altogether common experience and
observation confirm the conclusion which science has hardly yet
formulated, that light has a powerful and favourable influence upon
animal life. Human beings grow blanched just as plants do, for the
want of it. And it is not a question of colour merely; vitality is
seriously lowered also. This is largely felt in great towns shaded
by fog and smoke-clouds. Some recent remarkable experiments have
shown that the electric light exerts a favourable influence on
vegetation, second only to sunlight. It is possible that it may in
like manner foster animal life.” Dr. W. B. Cheadle in “The Book of
Health.”
* * * * *
In addition to the experiments on vegetation, at Cornell University
in America, and by Professor Siemens in England, recent experiments
have shown the value of electric light in general, and of certain
colour-rays in particular, in the treatment of various diseases
such as gout and its sisters and cousins, nervousness, lupus, and
so on. There are already several establishments in London where
electric light cures are to be obtained. Dr. Forbes Winslow in his
treatise on Light speaks even more emphatically than Dr. Cheadle
does about the bad effects of the absence of light. He says:--
* * * * *
“It is a well-established fact that, as the effect of isolation
from the stimulus of light, the fibrine, albumen and red
blood-cells become diminished in quantity, and the serum, or watery
portion of the vital fluid, augmented in volume, thus inducing a
disease known as _lukaemia_, in which white instead of red
blood-cells are developed. This exclusion from the sun produces the
sickly, flabby, pale, anæmic condition of the face, or ex-sanguined
ghost-like forms so often seen amongst those not freely exposed to
air and light. The absence of these essential elements of health
deteriorates by materially altering the physical composition of the
blood, thus seriously prostrating the vital strength, enfeebling
the nervous energy, and ultimately inducing organic changes in the
structure of the heart, brain and muscular tissue.”
* * * * *
The use of water as a means of curing disease and of preserving
health was revived early in this century by Priessnitz and his many
followers. In 1896 the oldest of German doctors, Professor and
Privy Councillor Adolf Kussmaul, of Heidelberg, refused to sign the
programme of the commissioners for medical examinations, because
“of hydropathy our young doctor, when he leaves the schools, knows
nothing at all.” In the same year Sir Lauder Brunton, in his Summer
Lectures at St. Bartholomew’s, testified to the wonderful effects
of the wet-sheet-pack; and the late Dr. Carpenter, Professor of
Physiology in the Royal Institution, as well as Dr. Wilson and Lord
Lytton, have spoken in praise of this very cheap and simple and
pleasant remedy which we heartily recommend for the reader’s trial.
The late Sir John Forbes wrote most enthusiastically about this and
other easy water treatments, which Dr. John Goodman contrasted with
the treatments by drugs, stimulants, overfeeding, and so on. As a
striking example we may quote his words about Diuretics (which have
been among the various means recommended for reducing weight):--
* * * * *
“_Allopathic Diuretics._--Squills, digitalis, nitric ether, acetate
of potash, broom-tops, dandelion, mercury.
“_Hydropathic Diuretics._--Copious water-drinking, hot-air baths,
sitz-baths, wet packing, &c. No remedies act more powerfully on the
kidneys without injury. Copious drinking of barley-water is good.”
CHAPTER VI.
AIR AND BREATHING.
Among all the millions of outside agencies that go to build up and
strengthen, or if improperly used to undermine, the health of the human
body, there is none so constant in our environment as air. At intervals
it is necessary to eat and to sleep. At intervals it is equally
essential for us to have light; but the use of air goes on from birth to
death; completely deprived of it only for a few minutes we die, and it
is largely because breathing is so obviously and always essential,
because except in definite ill-health it is completely automatic, that
few people even give a thought to the question, and most would be
disposed to laugh if they were told that there are different ways of
breathing, some right and some wrong. Consequently, most people with the
inherent perverseness of human nature use one of the wrong ways.
Observe, for instance, the way that the first hundred people you meet
down any crowded thoroughfare are breathing, and you will find probably
that (leaving out of the question those who are evidently out of breath)
more than three quarters have their mouths open, and are breathing
through them. That is the wrong way. Many of these may have a physical
difficulty in getting sufficient air through the nostrils. Some have
colds, perhaps, but more have over-large adenoids. Consequently if, when
you have no cold at all, you find you cannot get enough air through the
nostrils without effort, go straight to a doctor. But probably you can;
therefore, breathe through the nostrils. For nature, who, take her all
round, is a safe guide to follow, if she clearly indicates something,
has provided three passages by which air may reach the lungs. One is the
mouth, two are the nostrils. But the mouth (in addition to its sense of
taste most conveniently placed there) has the duty of carrying food and
drink to the stomach. The chances, therefore, are that the nostrils (in
addition to their sense of smell, again most conveniently placed there,
a sentinel to challenge the air, as it were, as the taste is a sentinel
to challenge the food) were designed to give air to the lungs. And they
are not ill-contrived. Witness, to take a horrible but convincing
instance, the amount of soot and smuts that are prevented from reaching
the lungs if we breathe through the nose during a London fog. The
nostrils are a sort of filter, tortuous, averting impurities. On the
other hand, many advocates of a sensible idea (as in vegetarianism and
total abstinence) are their own foes when they say that only the air
warmed by the longer passage is good for the lungs and makes them less
liable to catch cold. The reverse is probably the case, since people
with delicate lungs are cured of their delicacy or disease in the
coldest possible air, if it be dry.
Anyhow, the air gets to the lungs, otherwise we die; but the lungs,
which are the largest single organ in the human body and in many ways
the most adaptable, have this defect, and at the same time this enormous
advantage in case of disease, that a very small part of them need be
used in order to supply sufficient air to the stove of combustion. We
can at will (most of us do) employ the bottom part of them only, we can
(with more difficulty) employ mainly the middle part, or we can with
about the same difficulty employ the upper part. But since much of the
health of any organ or part of the body lies in its use, for not to use
an organ either passively or intentionally implies (with the only
exception of those organs which are partly intended as storers of
energy) its gradual atrophy, it is clearly the path of wisdom to give
the lungs their proper work. For “proper work” means not exhaustion to a
healthy organ but increase of strength and health. It is on the
scabbarded sword that the rust grows.
In the case of men, the use of the lower part of the lungs may at once
be dismissed, for it is without exception natural and habitual, whereas
in many women chest-breathing, owing no doubt largely to the use of the
old and unscientific corsets, is correspondingly habitual; and for men
the defect lies in hardly ever, except during violent effort, when one
is out of breath, using the middle and upper breathing. Roughly
speaking, lower breathing is accomplished by distention of the abdominal
part of the apparatus, middle breathing by distention of the part of the
body between the ribs, upper breathing by inflation of the chest. In
what we call a long breath, and in a yawn, the breathing is complete
throughout the whole of the lungs. It is this which is worth
cultivation, not only for the sake of the lungs themselves, but for the
sake of the control of breathing which is often useful.
But the main point lies in the habitual use of the whole of the lungs.
Take half a dozen long slow breaths, expanding the lungs to the utmost,
and again completely expelling the air, and you will find by experiment
that you can hold your breath for very much longer than you could do
without such preparation, the reason being that you have in the blood a
store of oxygen, however minute, that will carry you on for an
additional number of seconds. The advantages of this are obvious in the
case of great bodily exertion when the lungs have difficulty in getting
enough oxygen to supply the racing heart, for if they can easily,
through thorough practice, come without effort into complete use, they
will be able to supply without effort a greater fund of oxygen which
automatically (and God knows how) they for ever extract from the air,
returning the dead air, carbonic acid gas. In other words, the man who
can without effort use the whole of his lungs will keep them in a better
state of health than one who from continued non-use of the middle and
upper parts of them, has not maintained them in similar vigour. Such a
man, also, will be far less liable to be attacked by forms of pulmonary
disease than one who has half these organs in a state which corresponds
to being “below par” as applied to the whole body.
Here, as in the case of other muscles, definite exercises are good for
increasing the power of the lungs.
The following will be found invariably useful:--
* * * * *
(1) Breathe slowly in through the nostrils till the whole of the air
cavity is expanded to its fullest capacity.
(2) Hold the air there from five to ten seconds.
(3) Breathe it slowly out till the whole of the air cavity is as far as
possible empty.
(4) Hold it out for from five to ten seconds.
At first this exercise will be found fatiguing to the lungs and the
fatigue will be manifested, if not in giddiness, in a tendency to be out
of breath. By all means be out of breath, and, when the breathing is
normal again, repeat the exercise, going through it half a dozen times.
After a week you will find you can repeat it a dozen times or so without
intermission, or the desire for intermission. During the breathing in,
it will both help the lungs and encourage a greater fulness of breath to
raise the arms and shoulders. They should be held in “shrugged” position
while the breath is held, be allowed to drop gradually as the breath
goes out, and remain utterly relaxed during the fourth part of the
exercise. This exercise will be found most beneficial in enlarging the
capacity of the lungs and the power of expansion of the chest, which,
by the way, is a far more important thing than the actual size of the
chest. The exercise may also be used with the following (see Chapter
III.):--
Stand erect with the arms outstretched and hands together in front of
the face. Bring the arms quickly and suddenly back until they are level
with the shoulders, still at full stretch, at the same time letting the
breath come suddenly and fully into the lungs. After a pause of a second
or two, with the chest inflated to its utmost, bring the arms back to
the original position, expelling all the breath with the same
suddenness.
These two exercises, it must be repeated, are (especially for those who
need them--_i.e._, those who have not been in the habit of using the
whole of the lungs) rather trying, particularly at first; on no account,
therefore, strain or exhaust yourself over them. Let the facility in
doing them come slowly. These, like all lung exercise, should be
performed by an open window or in a room with good ventilation and as
free as possible from dust, since the point is to charge the lungs
thoroughly with air, which had therefore better be pure air. The open
mouth may be used in these exercises, since a full draught of air has to
be taken in suddenly.
But apart from actual exercises for the lungs, an even more important
point is that these organs should as far as possible be given, night and
day alike, a proper supply of air for their normal and automatic
working; and their one and constant demand is oxygen. Considering how
much there is in existence, it is wonderful how rare civilised life has
contrived to make it, while builders and architects seem to adopt the
uncompromising attitude of saying, “We will give you air and draughts,
or no air and no draughts.” Sometimes even, by an excess of diabolical
humour, they manage to give one draughts and no air, and render rooms
both cold and stuffy; and the continual breathing of unvivified air, of
air which has been exhausted of its oxygen by the breathing of other
people and not renewed by a constant fresh supply coming in, is probably
responsible for as much languor and indisposition as any of the errors
of diet mentioned in the previous chapter. Nor is it the least necessary
that because a room is hot the air should be bad; indeed, one of the
reasons why a good fire in the room is healthy is that, if there is an
adequate ventilator, the fire by its burning and by the passage of the
heat up the chimney induces a current of air, and though it warms a room
and may make it even over-hot, yet that heated air is not nearly so
enervating as the air of a cooler and ill-ventilated room. The lungs do
not in the least object to be fed with even roasted air, as in a Turkish
bath, any more than they dislike air of the utmost extremity of cold;
what they do rebel against is being given vitiated and exhausted air. It
is the quality rather than the temperature of the air we breathe which
has to be considered, and many people who say they cannot stand a hot
room mean not really a hot room but a stuffy one.
We have heard a good deal lately about the policy of the open door, and
recommend to our readers’ serious consideration the policy of the open
window as much as possible by day and always at night. Unless the head
of the bed is immediately by the window (and scarcely even then), it is
practically impossible to catch cold when one is in bed and properly
covered. To live under canvas, for instance, means to sleep almost
invariably in a thorough draught. But those who have tried that
delightful mode of life know that to catch cold under such circumstances
is almost unknown; one is constantly wet and is usually in a draught,
but one does not catch cold because these things in themselves do not
produce a cold in a healthy person, and one’s health in such conditions
is improved, because one has enough air and probably not too much food.
The air itself is tonic, strengthening; it is largely because in
civilised city-life we do not have enough that we are liable to colds.
The passages to the lungs, with their lining of mucous membrane, and the
lungs themselves, are clogged with impurities, and weak through a mild
form of starvation. Feed them. Clean them.
We do not, however, advise the ordinary city man deliberately to sit in
a draught, though if that were the only plan of getting air it might be
far better than his present procedure. Instead, we recommend him to look
to his ventilators, and whenever he feels that the office is stuffy let
him cut another or two, one low and one high; let him--and these remarks
apply to all dwellers in houses--warm his offices by fires rather than
hot pipes, if possible; for fires assist ventilation while they also
give heat, but pipes are valueless except for heat. Furthermore, a
screen of paste-board, or if light is wanted, of glass, can often be
arranged so that a window may be opened without creating a draught at
all; for though draughts are not, we think, so guilty in the way of
cold-giving as their reputation would seem to justify, yet they are
uncomfortable. But above all have windows open during sleep, that
mighty friend of recuperation, when rest ought to be brought to every
organ. And the natural rest to give the lungs is to supply them with
plenty of pure air, so that their work is made easy for them. Nothing is
commoner than long drowsiness and heaviness on waking, even after
perfectly sufficient sleep, and for this nothing is more responsible
than the fact that we have been breathing all night air which has been
steadily deteriorating because drained of its oxygen. Let the windows be
shut by all means, if you will, while you are dressing; but while
sleeping, never.
Though the lungs perform the main part of the breathing, much is done
also by the skin, which has this further function of continually
striving to throw off those waste products and impurities of the body
which rise like scum to the surface. How vastly important these
functions are is shown by the story of Pietro Riario, the boy
Cardinal-Archbishop of Florence, who at a feast gilded a child all over
to serve as a huge lamp bearer, with the consequence that in a few hours
the unfortunate victim died. It is clearly, then, desirable to listen to
the demands of the skin, which are as simple and intelligible as those
of the lungs, and consist of air, warmth (though to a far less extent
than is generally supposed), and cleanliness. It is by clothing and
baths that we meet these demands.
Now our general method of dealing with the skin is to wrap it up and put
it in the dark; in other words we cover it as much as possible, because
we say it is delicate and to expose it gives us colds. It is
delicate--that is quite true; but what has made it delicate is our habit
of covering it up. A woman, for instance, will pass with arms,
shoulders, breast, and a large part of the back bare, out of a heated
ball-room into a cool sitting-room and not catch cold, because her skin
is used to what--as far as the skin is concerned--is most sanitary and
healthy treatment. She does not catch cold, because her skin is used to
it, and one of the surest ways to guard against colds is deliberately
and every day to accustom it to exposure. Reasons of decency forbid us
to make this a public performance, but everyone can and should adopt
some course of the following kind. Strip completely on getting up and
(whether the bath, hot or cold, is taken immediately or not) go through
the other incidentals of dressing, shaving, etc., without clothes on.
Similarly at night undress completely at once and give the skin ten
minutes’ airing before getting into bed. At the same time, it is well to
avoid any feeling of chill, and if it is cold, sit before the fire a few
minutes, or, better still (unless you find that they keep you awake),
have a few minutes at the exercises given above, which will supply a
more thorough and invigorating warmth. The effect of this simple
treatment is, as we know from personal experience, quite amazing, both
in its hardening virtues, whereby we are far less liable to catch cold
at sudden chills or changes of temperature, in its tonic effect on the
skin itself, as shewn in a vastly increased firmness and elasticity, and
also in the constant and immediate feeling of freshness that it
produces. We all know how vivifying is fresh air on the face only; here
the whole skin is invigorated.
Not less important is the matter of clothing, which should be in the
first place as natural as possible, so that it may not distort the
natural shape, or cramp a natural movement. In the main, the ordinary
man’s clothing, though ugly enough, is in this respect sensible, except
with regard to boots, which really seem to be an invention of the devil
so as to thwart in every possible way what was meant to be the natural
play of the foot. Toes in a bunch, like asparagus, tightness over the
insteps, and the whole infernal contraption strapped on by a cruel
string cramping the muscle above, the ankle! A more insanitary
contrivance, or one better calculated to cramp the muscles and distort
the shape of the foot, especially if a man take much exercise on his
feet, could not be devised. Moreover, there is a sort of idea that boots
which conform to the natural shape of the foot must necessarily be
clumsy. This is not the case; but even if it were, it would be the part
of sense to go clumsily but healthily shod. What is necessary is to be
carefully measured for boots with the two feet separately, and with the
_weight resting on the foot that is being measured_, since the weight
naturally spreads out and flattens the foot, and it is of the first
importance to have a boot that is not cramped when the muscles of the
foot are being used. It is the toes that chiefly suffer in ill-fitting
boots, since the boot is, as a rule, made broad enough for the foot in
repose, but does not allow for the spread of the toes which takes place
(or should take place) every time a step is made. At this moment it is
obvious that the toes are being used as a lever to throw the body
forward to its next step, the whole weight is for the moment on them,
and their natural and reasonable tendency is to flatten out. Instead of
allowing for this, most bootmakers make their boots for the foot in
rest, with the result that the toes get crushed together at each step.
This point, doubly important in the case of children whose feet are
still growing is, it is satisfactory to see, being taken into serious
consideration at last, and year by year more children are allowed to
wear sandals, either with or without socks--an admirable institution,
for they give the foot its natural development. Many women’s feet are
really altogether unfit for walking purposes owing to the persistent way
in which they have been cramped from childhood upwards, following the
barbaric and Chinese fashion of considering a small foot a beautiful
thing. A delicately made foot of course is, but a foot naturally of
moderate size and cramped of its growth is merely a shapeless lump of
bent bones and packed flesh.
Secondly, clothing should be as easy as possible; there should not be
pressure, except for definite medical purposes of support, on any part
of a properly developed body; for pressure not only prevents the free
flow of blood to the capillary vessels of the skin, but checks the play
of any muscle which is being used, forbidding its expansion at the
moment of its energy, and thus cramping the freedom of its movement.
Thirdly, clothing should be as light as is possible consistently with
reasonable warmth. What is wanted, therefore, next the skin (in cold
weather at any rate) is some material like wool, which is porous and
therefore holds in its interstices innumerable little air-chambers that
when once warmed by the heat of the body form between it and the outer
clothing and air a layer of protection. It is exactly this plan that
nature has adopted in the covering of birds, and we find the lower part
of the feather-quill clad, not in the hard plumage of its tip, but in
soft down which interposes a cushion of air between the body and the
atmosphere. This is especially and markedly the case in aquatic birds,
part of whose body is incessantly in water; the natural oil of the stiff
part of the feathers is absolutely waterproof, while the down near their
base prevents, by its air and warmth-holding capacities, the chill of
the water reaching the body. Wool also has this advantage, that it
absorbs moisture, and thus a man clad in under-garments of wool will be
less liable to take cold if he gets chilled after violent exercise,
since the sweat is to a large extent drawn away from complete contact
with the skin.
On the other hand, cotton or silk next the skin, while it is less
warming and has not the full protective advantages of wool, gives more
air to the skin, since it does not cling so closely, and thus
facilitates the breathing functions of the skin, and also allows more
light to pass through it. Much must depend on the constitutional vigour
of the skin in individual cases, and on its reacting powers. For a
person naturally liable to catch cold, wool is certainly the safer
clothing.
Finally, all clothing worn next the skin should be very frequently
washed, for it is absorbing all day and every day the waste products of
the skin; it should also be well aired before use and kept if possible,
not in hermetically sealed drawers, but where air can get to it.
Perhaps no change of fashion in the last fifty years is greater than the
change that has come over bedrooms. Fifty years ago the ordinary healthy
man (if he could afford it) slept in a deep feather-bed into which his
unfortunate body sank and was smothered; his bed was probably draped at
the head with large curtains so as to prevent anything like a movement
of air getting to him (not that it was very likely, for he kept his
windows shut and curtained), while in case of anything so untoward
happening he had an additional protection in the shape of a nightcap,
while over the whole bed, as likely as not, was a heavy quilt. In fact,
the bed gear of fifty years ago was all that bed gear should not be. By
degrees the curtains were taken down, the feather mattress was
supplanted by a thinner and harder affair which got its elasticity from
springs below it, windows were opened, and the nightcap wore out and was
not replaced. In fact, the proper rule--the utmost coolness consistent
with comfort--came in. The head should be cool, the body not hot nor
smothered airlessly beneath masses of coverlets. The feet, however,
unless naturally warm, may with advantage have a rug thrown over them;
for, if they are warm, proper circulation of the blood is ensured, and
a most fruitful cause of insomnia removed.
To sum up in one sentence the general principles we have tried to lay
down in this chapter, we should say, “When in doubt, open it or take it
off”; the point being that you should whenever possible expose yourself
to air. Think for a moment of the different _régime_ adopted now, not
for people in health, but for consumptives, from what those unfortunates
suffered thirty years ago, and think also of the vastly increased
percentage of recoveries. Thirty years ago patients were sent to warm
enervating places, draughts and cold were treated as if they themselves
were the microbes of disease. Now _air_, _air_, _air_, and when the damp
and dulness of English winters arrives, up they go into piercing
elevations of Swiss mountains. And if air will heal definite disease, we
may take it completely for granted that so natural a remedy will be
highly beneficial to those in health, for it must and does act as a
preventive to disease, and is in itself health-giving. So also with
clothing: when in doubt take it off, for the more the skin is either
directly exposed or, though clad, allowed to get the maximum possible of
air and light, the healthier and the more vigorous it will become; and
instead of saying, “Put on a coat, or you will catch cold,” it will be
nearer the truth to say, “Continue not to put on a coat and you will not
catch cold.” Of course, there are an immense number of days when,
especially if one is out in the open air without taking exercise, a coat
is advisable, since the feeling of being cold is a natural danger
signal, and it is then our business to get warm. But the habit of being
cold is often due--and this is our point--to a relaxed and unvigorous
condition of the skin, and the coat is, as it were, only a dose to meet
a special need, whereas the rational treatment is to get the skin into
such a condition that the body is less liable to feel cold. And this
diminished liability to feel cold is promoted, not by covering the skin
up, but by accustoming it to be uncovered.
CHAPTER VII.
SLEEP, REST AND RELAXATION.
The late Sir Andrew Clark once said that he never knew anyone die from
insomnia, though he knew of many who had died from trying to cure it. To
a man who really suffers from insomnia, perhaps, this is but doubtful
consolation, but in any case the latter half of this great doctor’s
remark is valuable. For probably more poison is taken to remedy
insomnia, and on the whole with worse results, than in the alleviation
of any other disease which flesh is heir to. Drugs, especially
narcotics, are the most dangerous things in the world to play with,
since so many, if taken at all continuously, almost necessitate a
gradual increase in quantity. Besides, the morphia habit, or any habit
of that sort, is, frankly, the clutch of the fiend, and it would be
infinitely better to die of insomnia (were it possible) than be dragged
down to that particular Hell.
But it is not of these martyrs, whose case is one for doctors (who will
most likely be unable to help them), but of the ordinary man who may,
perhaps, not be a regularly good sleeper, and of those who are
habitually good sleepers, that we propose to speak. People who sleep
well, and know nothing about other forms of rest, may, perhaps, find
certain things here said, fantastic, but the problem of rest is just as
fascinating as the problem of energy, and curious though it sounds, rest
can be induced and improved even by exercises.
Broadly, then, rest and recuperation, which is equivalent to the act of
gathering energy, and is necessary to the employment of it, may come in
three fairly distinct ways, either by sleep, or by mere quiescence, or
by intentional and definite relaxation. The two first are purely
natural, being the instinctive demands of the brain and body after a
period of activity; the third is, at first anyhow, an artificial rest,
to be had always at command, and demanding more than mere quiescence to
induce it.
To take sleep first, it should be a condition as automatic as breathing,
but by its very nature, by the fact that, in order to arrive at it, both
body and mind must pass into and through a quiescent state, so that the
condition of unconsciousness may naturally come, it has many more foes
than the mere taking and expelling of breath. A severe pain in the foot
or any remote organ of the body will make sleep difficult, if not
impossible, until exhaustion has come, whereas such a pain would not in
any way prevent breathing; or, again, any anxiety or tension of mind
will hinder sleep. Continued pain, of course, results in bodily
exhaustion, continued anxiety in the corresponding exhaustion of the
mind, the inability to _think_ longer; but these are rather special
causes of sleeplessness, which are responsible for a comparatively small
percentage of those patients--for they are no less--who habitually sleep
badly, either finding difficulty in getting to sleep, or awaking at
timeless hours, or awaking, not to sleep again, in very early hours of
the morning. These, though one can class all under the general heading
of bad sleepers, are divisible into at least two distinct classes, while
insomnia may arise from very different causes.
Certain general rules apply to everyone in the regulation of the
bedroom, and though confirmed bad sleepers may scoff at the notion of
furniture and bedgear having anything to do with their own particular
thorn in the flesh, it will at any rate be harmless for them to know how
a bedroom can be regulated in order to give the best possible
conditions.
In the first place, then, mere stuffiness of a room will be often quite
sufficient to wake an ordinarily good sleeper, and if continued, to get
him into the habit of sleeping badly. If the air in a room gets
exhausted of its oxygen, he will during sleep breathe through his mouth
as well as his nostrils, the lungs rebelling against their starvation.
This continued for several hours will by the consequent dryness of mouth
and throat, and the discomfort ensuing upon it, be quite sufficient to
wake him, wake him thoroughly, that is to say, with a sense of
uneasiness amounting to positive discomfort. A proper bedroom,
therefore, should be incapable of stuffiness, that is to say, a window
should always be open, and the room be as free as possible from curtains
and carpets. No doubt the absence of them (of carpet, anyhow) affects
the stuffiness of a room only in a very small degree, but it has its
value in this way, that the air is far freer from dust, which is an
important point, if for eight hours or so out of every twenty-four you
are breathing that air. But it is true that the influx of light in the
early morning tends to wake some people, and the absence of curtains
lets in light. For this there are two remedies, both equally simple:
have blinds of the ordinary dark-blue stuff which quite effectually
excludes light, or better, pass a couple of nights, three or four
perhaps, in which you are awakened by light. After that you will fail to
notice it, and one of the present writers, who for years thought he must
awake when light came in, found after doing so once only, that it made
not the slightest difference, and he who carefully drew curtains, and
had the position of a strange bed altered so as to be away from the
light has now often awoke, when called, in a blaze of sunshine.
He is, therefore, you will conjecture, a naturally good sleeper.
Naturally, no--that is to say, in early life he was a persistently bad
one, who used to adopt all kinds of means to go to sleep, of which
presently. But for the last six years his record is this: he has, as far
as he remembers, through good and ill report, through such anxieties as
are inseparable from life itself, through one attack of typhoid fever,
and two of influenza, in spite of hard work up till the time of going
to bed (in fact, particularly then, since he finds he works best when
the small hours begin to grow bigger), lain awake for never more than
one complete hour on three occasions. Once he had coincidently a bad
cold, on the other two occasions he failed then, and fails now to
account for so extraordinary a proceeding. All told, then, in six years
he has been awake for three solid hours when he meant to be asleep.
Otherwise, he extinguishes his light--and is called.
Now the secret of this is, as far as he knows, the complete conviction
that he is going to sleep, a conviction not expressed at all, but an
acquired instinct. Yet he does not--he says all this at the risk of
being accused of egotism, but hoping it may be useful--bother about the
matter at all. Once he used to bother about it: that was in the days
when he slept rather badly; now he does not. Nor does he go to bed in
the hopes of going to sleep; he does not go to bed till he feels,
instinctively again, that it is time. Thirdly, if he has gone to bed
early, and is not going to be called till after he has had his fill of
sleep (this is rare, since he is a glutton at it), he instantly reads or
gets up instead of trying to go to sleep again (which in itself would do
no harm), or instead of wondering why he has awoke. This would do harm,
for it partakes of the nature of “bothering about it.” He avoids sleep
during the day, this also he thinks is crucial, and if he feels sleepy
(sleepy, not to be compared with inclined to rest) he gets up and does
something.
To return for a moment to his bedroom. The windows are open, there is no
carpet, he has blankets which vary according to the time of year, but
whatever the time of year he has an extra thickness over his feet. In
his rare moments of semi-consciousness he sometimes (this is towards
morning, always when the world is coldest) draws the extra covering over
him, and without really waking sleeps again. He also invariably goes to
sleep on his right side and invariably wakes lying on his left.
We have spoken about this enviable slumberer at some length, because he
seems instinctively to have got hold of (no credit to him) some of the
points which will be of use to the moderately bad sleeper, whose
condition, we maintain, is wrong. If sleep is required, it is as
pitiable not to get it as not to be able to eat without indigestion when
hungry; if sleep is not required, it is as foolish to try to induce it
as to eat when one is not hungry, also with indigestion. But to draw the
lesson from this enviable slumberer, though much that he does would
murder sleep like Macbeth (witness his odious habit of working
immediately before going to bed), still much that he does is sensible.
Pre-eminently sensible, for instance, is his acquired habit of not
bothering about it, for the wondering whether one is going to go to
sleep is in many cases quite sufficient to keep one awake. Go to bed
assuming naturally, not with insistence, for that would spoil it all,
that you _are_ going to sleep, or to use a phrase from hypnotism, make
the suggestion that you are. You will not succeed in capturing this
attitude the first time you try, nor yet the second, but before long you
probably will; probably, also, when you have done so, you will become a
good sleeper. But if this fails, what then? You will lie awake, that is
all, and you will not die of it. But if you fret about it you will lose
all the benefit of the act of resting, which is very great. To lie
still with twitching nerves, agonising for sleep, will not only not
bring sleep, but it will deprive you of rest. You lie awake. Be it
so--at any rate, rest.
Here innumerable complications enter. You may think it is a noise that
is keeping you awake. Someone, who ought to be in bed, is moving about
directly above you. Do not get irritated and think over the biting
things you will say to-morrow. The morrow will take care of itself.
Supposing there was a gale blowing, you would acquiesce in the Natural
Law, and in consequence would go to sleep sooner, because you were not
irritated. And irritation, it must be remembered, should be wholly
within our control; in this case to get it in control is an essential
preliminary to sleep. While you are cross you will not sleep. Therefore,
cease to be cross. A greater distraction would calm your irritation;
let the desire for calmness calm it.
Of great mental anxiety as a cause of insomnia, or of great physical
pain, it is not our purpose to speak, for these are exceptional cases.
But the ordinary person must, with an effort--until the act becomes
automatic--put out of his mind when he goes to bed all interesting
things, if he wishes to become a good sleeper. He must, at first anyhow,
having definitely told himself that he is going to sleep, consciously
let his mind dwell on monotonous affairs. Sheep going through a gap in a
hedge is a recognised soporific, and no doubt an excellent one, only he
must be absorbed not in each sheep but in the stupifying multitude of
them. Similarly he may try to mark out a lawn-tennis court with as few
possible liftings of the marking machine, without of course going over
any line twice. Or he may say over and over again some passage of
poetry, or some familiar form of words, which should be short, so as to
procure the benefit of the tedious effect of mere senseless repetition.
But, after he has wasted time--for these things are waste of time if one
wants to go to sleep--in this manner, he must take into consideration
methods even more simple than these. Cold feet, the least feeling of
hunger will easily, especially in a nervous person, induce
sleeplessness. If such causes are present, then additional covering, and
some easily digestible food--biscuits, fruit, etc., will probably
relieve him. Again, washing the face in cold water, also an awakening
process, tends to send the blood anywhere but to the brain, which is
desirable. A hot-water bottle to the feet serves the same object. Or
again, failure of digestion is a common cause of sleeplessness; if there
is a chance of this being the cause, drink hot water before going to
bed, or cold water with a little bi-carbonate of potash.
Considering the incalculable benefit which a habit of sleep produces, we
do not feel ashamed to write down aids, however tiny, to produce it. For
that it is largely a habit is beyond question, and as a habit it is one
of the entirely healthful habits--it is essentially good. But the
contrary habit, that of lying awake, though largely remediable, is not
fatal, and its ill-effects are immeasurably neutralized if the will is
steadily exerted towards the grasp of that truth. To lie awake, fretting
that one cannot go to sleep, is distinctly bad; to lie awake, if no
remedy short of drug-drinking will cure it, does not appreciably matter,
so long as one accepts “rest” as the best possible substitute.
A different variety of sleeplessness is that which attacks the sufferer
early in the morning, say three or four hours before he wishes to get
up. For this a somewhat heroic remedy may be tried, since it is always
possible that natural awaking may mean one thing--namely, that you have
had enough sleep. Therefore, it may be worth while, just once or twice,
to try the effect, if you are really broad awake, of getting up instead
of encouraging yourself to wake early again by letting this early waking
dwell on your mind. You will probably be very tired by the next evening,
you may even (in this case the remedy is clearly futile) be too tired to
sleep. But it may easily happen that you will sleep that night
exceedingly well, and wake at a normal time again. But if again, and yet
again you continue to wake early, it is no use persisting in this
treatment. Or you may awake, as stated before, owing to the airlessness
of your room, and the fact that you have been breathing with an open
mouth, or, and this is probably a frequent cause of early awakings, you
may be engaged for weeks or months together on some absorbing
occupation. You sleep at first because tired, and sleep deeply, but as
the hours go by the sleep becomes lighter, and before your body regains
consciousness at all, that strange part of the brain, the subliminal
self, or the sub-conscious self, is awake, and begins thinking
(gradually arousing the rest of you) of the engrossing occupation. Soon
the whole brain is awake, and by the sub-conscious self is reminded, as
it were, of the business. Then having once begun thinking about it, it
is difficult for you to regain that passivity which is invariably the
prelude to sleep, though it need be scarcely more than instantaneous.
It is here that the cause of sleeplessness and its remedy we believe
largely lie, for it is within the power of all to put themselves into
the control, more or less complete, of their sub-conscious self and
develop the power of the sub-conscious self until it becomes a real
potency. To take an example, how constantly does it happen that after
wrestling with some mental difficulty, or trying to remember some name
which one knows well, one by instinct dismisses the subject, to find in
a few minutes that the difficulty is solved, or the name recollected.
That is probably the work of the sub-conscious part of the brain. In the
same way many people can wake themselves at any hour they wish, by
telling their sub-conscious brain (this is what it comes to) to call
them. They go to sleep, having ordered their sub-conscious self to call
them, and at the appointed hour, it may be long before light, something
inside them, which apparently knows the time, wakes the rest of the
sleeping brain and body. And with a little training and practice the
power of developing and using the sub-conscious brain increases very
quickly. We believe that many early wakers could sleep comfortably on,
by saying that they would _not_ awake till a certain hour. One does not
need violence or internal shouting, as it were, to communicate
effectually with this sub-conscious self; a quiet determination of
thought for a few moments before going to sleep does the work
effectually. This also is invaluable to many who have found that going
to sleep when getting into bed was difficult. One has to take it for
granted that one is going to sleep, and cease to think about it,
emptying the brain of conscious thought as far as may be. You cannot go
to sleep in a rage, until the rage has given place to exhaustion.
To sum up, then, both for those who find it difficult to go to sleep,
and for those who wake early, the following hints are recommended:--
(i.) Do not load your brain with interesting stuff, just before
going to bed. This will both prevent your going to sleep, and will
also tend to wake you up. Try reading a stupid book for a few
minutes after getting into bed.
(ii.) Have as much air as possible in the room, and wear the
minimum of bed-clothing that keeps you warm. But have an extra rug
over the feet, which you can easily draw over you towards morning,
when both the night is coldest, and your vitality lowest.
(iii.) If you still lie awake, try the effect of some monotonous
exercise, like counting sheep going through a gap, marking out a
tennis-court, or repeating some short and familiar form of words.
(iv.) If you suspect even slight indigestion, take a little
bi-carbonate of soda or of potash.
(v.) Tell yourself quite quietly that you _are_ going to sleep, but
do not rouse yourself to see how you are getting on.
(vi.) Eat or drink something easily digestible, rice, biscuits, or
hot cocoa.
(vii.) If all these are useless, be quite resigned; try not to get
irritated, do not toss about if you can avoid it. Do not think
about interesting things. In fact, if you cannot sleep, take as
much rest as you can. Lie utterly relaxed and breathe deep.
Finally, with regard to the number of hours of sleep required, it
must remain a personal question. Some people do not need more than
between five or six, especially in later life, others seem
positively to need not less than eight. But the chances are that
everyone requires from about five and a half to eight. Less than
that minimum is probably insufficient in the long run, more than
eight probably unnecessary for anyone in good health. Nor must it
be forgotten that in itself the desire for much sleep is not a
healthy sign; it may easily point to a sluggish liver.
This brings us to the second division of the subject--namely Rest, which
does not only largely diminish the ill-results of not sleeping at night,
but is probably good for all hard workers either of mind or body, at
certain times during the day, in particular after a long continued
stretch of brain-work, when an interval should be taken by the mind;
after a meal, when quiescence on the part of the body leaves the
digestion more energy to do its work; and after physical exercise, when
those limbs which have borne the brunt of it should be left quiescent.
A flat or semi-recumbent position is the best, one in which the body is
completely supported, and no muscular effort is needed to retain it in
its position; and the deep breathing of sleep may be at first imitated
and will soon be acquired. The reason for this is that since slow, long
breath is the means naturally adopted by the lungs in sleep, it is
probably the best method of resting the breathing muscles even when
awake. It is a mistake to spend too long over these rests; if two a day
are taken, a quarter of an hour, provided it be real rest, is likely to
be sufficient to freshen one up again completely, while if the muscles
are left too long relaxed, they will be disinclined to begin work again.
Now sleep and rest are widely different from relaxation, the third means
of recuperation mentioned above, since the first two are purely
natural, and require merely passivity as a condition, whereas
intentional relaxation is at first purely artificial, and requires, even
when it has become easy with practice, certain voluntary efforts. It has
therefore this initial disadvantage, and in addition this further one,
that in the young it is seldom if ever required, since the natural means
of recuperation, Sleep and Rest, supply all that is wanted. Unless
habits are acquired in childhood or youth, however, there are few people
who will ever spare the time to acquire them at all. It requires also an
exercise of imagination--rest, that is to say, has to be attained
self-consciously.
This all sounds confusing, and with a view to making it rather more
intelligible by an easy instance of it, the following is recommended. It
is of no use merely reading it, the thing has to be tried, and after two
or three trials it will be time enough to say whether the particular
individual finds it of value. Thus:--
Sit straight in any chair with a back to it. Close the eyes and draw a
long, slow breath in, gradually lifting up the head, and thinking as far
as may be of nothing whatever. Then breathe slowly out, letting the head
drop forwards and the body and spine bend forwards, till the whole
attitude is that of something broken or lifeless. Repeat.
Now this may sound like a meaningless formula to any who have never
tried it. But the fact remains that many who have, find--whether it is
the imagination that tells them so, or not--that they gain more
recuperation from a couple of minutes of this, than they possibly could
in the same time-limit of mere rest or sleep. The reason is not far too
seek: in sleep and in rest the muscles certainly _do_ rest, but is it
not more than possible that a muscle bidden by the will to rest, rests
far more completely? Certainly each of the present writers, if, for
instance, he is thoroughly tired, and by the exigencies of life he has
to do something else in three minutes by the clock, does not attempt to
lie down or go to sleep for three minutes, which he can easily do, but
has found by experience that voluntary and intentional relaxation like
this, dictated by the will, is far more freshening than either rest or
sleep. At any rate he so believes it is, that the illusion is complete.
The fact of saying to the muscles, “I _will_ rest,” is indeed more
immediately productive of refreshment than passive rest. This may sound
fantastic, but to take a larger instance, how often has it happened that
a patient in some serious fever, when exhaustion is the foe to be
dreaded, has pulled through by an exercise of will, by making an
effort, whereas if he had lain passive--in the natural condition for
recovery--he would certainly have died? There are few doctors who would
not endorse this. And voluntary relaxation, in the same way, is the
remedy for milder exhaustion, especially when another business has to be
gone about almost immediately. To some, the note “quack” will sound
here. But “quack” is worth trying, if it can do no harm.
The same exercise--one of the present writers has not personally found
it so successful--may be tried standing, or in a more elaborate form, it
can be tried lying. From a kneeling position on the floor, with the head
forward on the chest, and the spine relaxed, one slowly, but with the
vivid idea of _rest_ in one’s mind, crumbles down to a lying position,
eventually resting on the back, with legs and arms outstretched and
separate. The breathing must be full, slow, and rhythmical. Then after a
minute or two one rises very quietly.
Or, again, relaxation in a milder form can hardly fail to be useful to
everybody, and many people practise it unconsciously. The commonest form
which is known to everyone is _stretching_ at the end of work, and for a
few seconds afterwards remaining utterly relaxed. No one has ever
stretched--we boldly assert this--without the subsequent relaxation,
which, quite apart from the relief of a cramped position that stretching
gives, gives rest to the body. Similarly, also, every sedentary
brain-worker will find that he works best when he is most unconscious of
his body, when the energy which would be employed in bracing limbs is
left unoccupied for the brain to make use of. Mere stillness is of
course not at all the same thing, for stillness may go with rigid
stiffness. But the point of relaxation is that during work every muscle
that is not employed in that work should have nothing whatever to do,
and that after work no muscle should have anything to do if the work has
been physical, and if mental that the brain should be empty. True the
will has to say, “Holiday for all, holiday for all,” because all rest
better so; but no more. _The energy of the whole frame is devoted to
rest._
In the same way, just as when the brain bears the stress of exertion,
the body should be completely relaxed, so when one part of the body, the
arms or legs, for instance, are actively employed, and above all when
storage of energy may be useful, the rest of the body not wanted should
be trained to give no trouble, not to require the usage of energy.
Innumerable instances of the truth of this present themselves, for in
athletics “reserve,” “quietness of action,” all imply the unconscious
storage of energy. Force employed is energy gone, and the less
unnecessary energy one spends, the more there is left for endurance.
Look at a practised racket player and one who does not know how to
husband himself! The one takes two quiet steps and is in easy time, the
other rushes to the corner, is there before there is any need, and has
to make a call on his muscles to check himself. Result, one has expended
no energy, practically speaking, in getting there, the other has parted
with energy twice, once to start with violence, once to check himself
with violence. This repeated twice a minute for half-an hour will leave
one fresh, the other beaten.
Here we have an instance of intentional sparing, a thing related to
relaxation, for both are an economy of force. And in this body of ours,
so “fearfully and wonderfully made,” servant as it is or should be to
the will, a conscious command is far more binding than a _laisser
aller_. A man with a severe headache may be unable to go to sleep in the
ordinary course, but let him learn to know and practise the use of the
huge power of will that is lying chiefly dormant within him, and he will
not only be able to get on satisfactorily with his work, which would be
impossible if he paused to think how his head hurt, but he will easily
be able to go to sleep. He could, and the ordinary man can, if he tries,
induce by practice both energy and passivity.
But there are “foes of its own household” even here, as in Vegetarianism
and Teetotalism. And the hearth-abiding foe of the power of the will is
Christian Science. This strange sect holds that _all_ ailments are
imaginary, and that since there is no matter, there is no such thing as
a broken leg, because there is no leg. This is futile, and the answer
incontestably is that there must be legs because they can be broken. But
the subject is not worth discussion.
Again, to sum up:--
(i.) To mean to do a thing is productive of better results than to
let the thing happen.
(ii.) Therefore, let your will intend rest, and you will get rest
more effectively than by lying down.
(iii.) You do not tire the will by using it. On the contrary, it is
only by its use that it can get strong.
(iv.) There are two things that weaken the will: the first is not
using it, the second is not obeying it.
CHAPTER VIII.
THE INFLUENCE OF TRAINING ON MIND AND MORALS.
It is impossible to make the simplest movement of any kind without the
conscious or unconscious direction of the mind, so inextricably are the
two bound up together; and from the earliest times physicians, both
spiritual, mental and physical, have known that the soul can be reached
through the “subtle gateways of the body.” This aspect of training, the
importance, that is, of the cleanly health of the body, and its prompt
and unrebellious obedience to the will, which is concerned with this
question, has been alluded to before, and is dealt with more fully here.
In the chapter on exercises we insisted that both for their direct use
in athletics, and for their far greater significance in life, the speed
and promptitude of the body’s obedience was an attainment of great
value, for thus the mind has at its call a quick ready servant to do its
errands, instead of a slow loiterer. We saw, also, that these exercises,
while they are in progress, necessitate strict attention, which we may
now add should be consciously applied, as learnt there, to other
pursuits. Let, for instance, the man who has accustomed himself by this
drill, for so we may call it, to attend with concentrated attention to
these simple actions of the body, apply that attitude of mind which is
now familiar to him to other tasks. Let us say he has before him a
tedious piece of work, which at the same time requires minute
attention. Let him, then, put himself into that frame of mind (he
remembers it quite well) with which he performs his exercises. Many
people hardly know what real attention means: there is no better way to
teach it than to make rapid and correct movements, which cannot be made
without it. In the same way, also, these exercises give the habit of
control. A man who has brought mind and body into the relation of master
and willing servant, even in so elementary a matter as this, is going on
the right road to teach himself control in the largest choices and
difficulties. So, too, in other points of training: a man who has made
himself able to drop smoking, or abstain from stimulants, or from
certain sorts of food which he likes, but which his reason tells him are
bad for him, has not improved his power of self-control in that point
only, but has begun, at any rate, to form a habit of it; and the
exercise of self-control, in one point only, will make his power of
control stronger all round, in each and every case where his reason
suggests control to him. It is here, as a tonic to the mind, that
training of some sort, apart from all its other uses, is recommended to
everybody; not training for some special event, which, as soon as the
event has come off is dropped, but a daily and continual observance of
certain rules of health, a daily practise of exertion of will and
obedience of body.[12]
Again, the health of the body contributes directly to the power and
strength of the mind. Work, which is irksome and comparatively badly
done by a man who, for any cause, digestive or otherwise, is in only
moderate health, will be done by the same man with zest and far better
results if he is in good health. Also, the mind is able to accomplish
not only better work but more work, when the whole system is not laid
under a general tax to repair and make well any enfeebled or clogged
organ. A single rusty joint, a badly fitting valve in an engine, makes
the whole run less smoothly than it should, and also implies a waste of
energy. Body and mind together, working in co-operation as they always
must, are a close parallel to this. The one cannot possibly be at its
best unless the other is in health. Rightful activity in the one
stimulates activity in the other, just as artificial stimulants, such
as spirits to the body, induce a mental activity in all respects like
the physical one, temporary in character and followed by reaction. But
the habit of briskness, of activity, of quick decision, is a thing fully
as much mental as it is bodily; the two are inseparable, and, therefore,
in the training of the body, the qualities which we should aim to
acquire are those which are mentally desirable. One man’s mind may, it
is true, be naturally a much less fine instrument on its own level than
his body, and much less easily trained, but the self-control, the
alertness, the habit of speed, which such training as we have sketched
out gives, will directly and inevitably affect his mind. It may still be
slow and laborious in its workings, but it would otherwise have been
slower. Also, whatever work it does it does better, because it is not
clogged, hindered, and distracted by an unhealthy body.
Now this interweaving of mind and body is so complex, so closely knit,
that it would perhaps be beyond the sphere of safety to say that the
knitting together of the body and that within us which is the spring of
moral, not intellectual qualities, the soul in fact, is closer than that
of the mind and body. In any case, the interdependence of body on soul,
of soul on body, and of both on the mind is practically complete, and
this human trinity makes up man. There is no healthful habit of body
which does not directly exercise a healthful influence on the soul, no
harmful habit which does not hurt it. The body sins, and in its secret
place the soul sickens. From the other side, also, a high moral standard
infallibly leads the body to adopt healthy habits, a low moral standard
suffers it to drift into physical crime and degradation.
Now city life, especially to anyone who has been accustomed to have a
good deal of exercise without a modification of the food and stimulants
he may take without hurt in a more active country life, is apt to put
the body into a state which renders it particularly liable to all kinds
of moral attack. The life is largely sedentary, and in consequence a
great deal of physical vigour in young men, which would in the country
be naturally and healthily expended in games and exercise for the upper
classes, in manual labour for the lower, remains unused, and, except to
those of strong moral principle, is a dangerous thing. Again, without
modification of diet to suit the circumstances, most people eat more
stimulating food than they require, and, as a natural sequence, drink
more stimulating and intoxicating drinks than are good for them. This,
in itself, is another exciting cause to the passions. To exercise
self-control under these circumstances is a laudable and a difficult
thing; but a far simpler remedy lies to hand--namely, in not letting
these circumstances exist, by deliberately taking less stimulant and
deliberately stinting oneself in the matter of food, or giving a fair
trial to the simpler foods spoken of before, which will be found to be
far less exciting, though quite as nourishing. There are many men who
are capable, as far as will power goes, of limiting themselves in this
manner, who, if they do not limit themselves, become nearly helpless in
the grip of their temperament. For a life of sensual indulgence, to put
it on the lowest grounds, is bad for the body and the mind; sensual
thought even becomes a habit as hard to get rid of as any morphia
habit, and for many to try to rid themselves of it, while they continue
to keep their bodies in a permanent state of excitability owing to
overmuch food and stimulant, would be like attempting to cure the
morphia habit, and yet continually going about with a phial of it in the
pocket. And nothing, again putting the question on low grounds, is so
bad for the nerves as to be incessantly desiring and dwelling in thought
upon a certain thing, and incessantly refusing to gratify the desire. We
do not, of course, mean that it would be better to gratify it,’ but that
it is better to take hold of it by the root, not merely pinch the stem,
and, as far as possible, get rid of the desire. For there are certain
temptations, and impurity is one, which are not safe to fight
consciously, since to approach them even in thought means to be seized,
as it were, by the tentacles of some infernal cuttlefish. Do not school
yourself to fight them; school yourself to run away from them. Interest
yourself in other things, tire yourself physically, and, above all, do
not indulge in stimulants of food and drink, which, however innocent
they may be in themselves, predispose, by the very feeling of vigour
they give, to things which are not innocent.
It is not only the suddenness and almost overwhelming force of physical
temptation to some natures which constitutes their only danger, it is
the gradual, hardly observable nature of the effect of such indulgence.
For years, it is no use denying it, a man’s mental and bodily health may
continue, as far as one can see, absolutely unimpaired by such excesses.
The greatest harm is done by preachers, schoolmasters, and others who
warn boys that such habits will lead to immediate decay of the mental
and physical powers, and early death. The boy may be frightened for a
time, but if this is the only preventive that keeps him back, his fright
will wear off, and he will find by experience that no such effect, as
was predicted, follows. He will, therefore, probably conclude that there
is no ill-effect. He will, also, assuredly meet men who tell him that
such practises are good for the health. A greater fallacy was never
invented by the devil himself. There is no truth whatever in it. But
what his teacher ought to have taught him was that such practices are
the cause of mental and physical decay in thousands, though not
immediately, that to yield to such temptations is for everyone to become
less able to resist them, and that by perfectly simple rules in the use
of water, in the limiting of food especially, for instance, late in the
evening the force of such temptations becomes infinitely less. Many
people, no doubt, will say that this is a low ground on which to build
up high motives. It is for that very reason, since it will appeal to
those to whom high motives would not appeal, that it is so extremely
useful. Thus it will appeal to many to know that at the age, let us say,
of fifty, a man who has lived purely is, almost without exception, a
stronger and more vigorous person, more capable of work and also of
enjoyment than one who, in early manhood has, though possibly for a few
months or weeks only, behaved like a mere ‘brute beast.’
It is in this connection that we strongly advocate the introduction into
London and other big towns of those evening clubs for exercise, which
have been tried with great success in America. There are boys’ and men’s
clubs in enormous numbers in London, and admirable things they are, but
we know of few where billiards is not, perhaps, the most violent form
of exercise provided. What is wanted is a number of tall buildings built
with many floors, where, for a moderate subscription, that class of
young man who now spends his evenings in the promenade of the music
halls, or in aimless (perhaps it would be better if they were aimless)
strolls up and down Piccadilly with not infrequent visits to the public
house, could get an hour’s violent exercise in boxing, fencing, or
gymnastics. We fully believe that this class, as a whole, would enjoy
such an evening far more than the evenings they are now accustomed to
spend; that it would be infinitely better for them in body, mind and
soul alike, not even the flabbiest moralist would be disposed to deny.
As it is, a young man gets away from his work, say at five or so, and
what in heaven’s name is the poor vigorous thing to do with the hours
that divide him from his natural bedtime?[13] It is out of the question
to expect that he should sit in his room and read a book; he has been at
work all day; his body tingles for diversion. Out he goes, if he is
human at all. In the general way there are two places open to him, the
public-house or the streets. There his vigour finds further stimulus, or
unhappily, its satisfaction. That there are, as we have said, many
clubs for such people is perfectly true, but papers, draughts, chess
(and we suppose now pingpong), are not the sort of thing that is needed
to work off the potential violence of the body. What is wanted is
violent exercise.[14] That such institutions would be enormously popular
with the class of which we speak, those, in fact, for whom more
expensive clubs are utterly out of the question, is, we think, beyond
doubt, and financially, we believe, that they could quite easily be made
to pay. It would, of course, be out of place to discuss this here, but
it is worth noting that where such clubs have been tried in Boston and
elsewhere, they have proved successful.
It is these evening hours which are the dangerous time. Purposeless
loafing in the streets, though entertaining enough, is not sufficient
for a vigorous young body, which has been pent all day at work; while
loafing with purpose, we may say, is not good for anybody, yet it is to
loafing with purpose that purposeless loafing naturally leads.
Purposeless loafing is innocent enough, but, to use the morphia simile
again, it is as if the sufferer from the morphia habit took a bottle of
morphia and continued to finger it, a highly dangerous performance; and
we do not believe that the class which loafs in the streets, anyhow the
best of them, loaf because they prefer it to some suitable employment
for their body, but because no suitable employment for their body, is
accessible to them. The bulk of them would vastly prefer something
different, and the eagerness with which they would embrace bodily
exercise may be gathered from the crowds on the Serpentine and waters of
the park if skating is possible. The theatre every night is, of course,
as hopelessly out of their means, as it would be to belong to Prince’s
or Lord’s, but with what patience and in what numbers do the crowds wait
at the pit door. The middle classes of England, we believe, are not
naturally sensual, but, as it is, during just those hours in the day
when they are at leisure, there is nothing whatever for them to do,
except loaf, till loafing becomes a habit, and from being an innocent
one passes into the Devil’s care, who has made the London streets what
they are, down the most populous of which, Piccadilly, the Strand, etc.,
no man would willingly take his sister at night.
It is towards this removal of causes that predispose towards ill-health
in the moral sphere, ill-health as shown by a lack of energy,
promptitude, power of work and endurance in the mind, that the training
of the body, as we have attempted to outline it, is largely and
unceasingly devoted. Health, as we understand it, the condition, that is
to say, not of the ordinary man who considers he is “well enough,” but
that higher health which is the result of training the body to
quickness, energy, and so to strength, which implies an obedience to the
reason in matters of food and stimulants, directly benefits a man’s
moral and mental life. The body “is in subjection”; it obeys with less
struggle the dictates of the non-material part of man, and it obtains in
itself a greater resistive power to temptations of laziness or lust,
just as it obtains a greater resistive power to its own purely physical
enemies of cold or fatigue. It is in this respect, therefore, (a far
higher consideration than mere physical fitness), that we put forward a
system of training that will be likely to ensure such results, and that
consequently we regard the obedience to laws of bodily health, and
means of physical fitness, as partaking of the nature of duty. And this
further: it is clearly accepted as man’s duty that he should keep his
mind and his morals in the highest and best possible state; but seeing
how intimately both these are knit with his body so that none can act
without the other, the soul sinning through the body, the mind dictating
every movement, is it reasonable to suppose that a corresponding duty is
not laid on man with regard to the health of his body? Is it not, in
fact, directly his duty to keep his body, as well as his soul and mind,
in its highest and best possible state? No doubt compromises have often
to be made; a man, in order to do his work, may be obliged to disregard
certain rules which the health of his body requires should be kept. But
saving this, there seems to us to be a clear duty with regard to
physical health, quite apart from the advantage which physical health
will bring to his mind and morals. This wonderful machine is a servant,
no doubt, of the mind, but shall the master keep it, so to speak, in an
insanitary attic, and pay no regard to its health? The compromises also,
which we have just spoken of, will be rarer if the body is well, since
it will be more capable of bearing fatigue and unreasonable hours of
work.
_The simple, but unswerving principles on which morals are based, the
highest development of the mind, the utmost health of the body_: these
things, and nothing short of them, are the results of ideal training.
CHAPTER IX.
TRAINING FOR SPECIAL EVENTS.
The excuse for this chapter in a book written (as set forth), not for
the athlete primarily, but for the average man, who is hopelessly
incapable of prominence or great excellence in any one branch of
athletics, lies in the fact that such a vast number of people nowadays
play games, and are so anxious on certain days to do their best at them
in some competition, that quite a fair percentage of readers will, it is
hoped, pick up a hint or two which may serve them in good stead at that
trying moment when they are about to drive a ball from the first tee on
some medal day; about to step out on to the glaring prominence of a
lawn-tennis court; about to go in (fifth wicket down) when a rot has
apparently set in; or, may be, to play a preliminary tie in the City and
Suburban Ping-pong Handicap. For it is at these cold and shuddering
moments, which no one can hope to meet with more than stolidity, that
one needs to have all one’s wits about one, to be able to keep one’s
nerve, and to have one’s strong points at one’s fingers’ ends, and one’s
weak points (we all have these, and the better one grows at any
particular sport, the more glaring they seem proportionately to become)
anyhow passably defended. At one minute, or less, from now it may be
that your weak point will be attacked; your drive may land you a full
iron shot from the green, a stroke you particularly detest; you may
have a scurry after a cross-court return; you may have a yorker on the
leg stump. In all such, the important thing is, not only to be prepared
for them now, but to have been prepared for them so long before that the
preparation has become a habit. Such strokes may still be your weak
point, but you will meet the emergencies calmly. And to meet any
emergency calmly is in itself a favourable defence, for you will then no
longer be flurried.
Now in any game, when you have to meet a definite attack of an
opponent--this necessity does not apply to a game like golf, or croquet,
or billiards, since in such games you have to do the best you can
yourself, without fear of active opposition--there is a golden rule,
which has never been enough insisted on, and it is the rule that lies at
the base of all we have said about training generally, as applied to
games. Practice is at the root of it, and the object is to get so
familiar with the stroke dictated by the exigencies of the moment, that
it is practically automatic.[15] That is to say, as soon as the attack
(your opponent’s return, or the bowler’s ball) is coming, you will, with
the least possible expenditure of energy, recognise it, get into the
position to meet it, and have the stroke ready. For instance, if the
game is lawn-tennis, you will see that a drive into the left-hand corner
of the court is probable, and before you have really formulated this to
yourself consciously, you should be half-way there, not vaguely, but
ready for the attack. Your body should have moved almost automatically,
and thus your attention and will-power is reserved for noticing your
opponent. He may change his mind at the last second (you can never tell
about opponents), and instead of driving into the left-hand corner he
may lob gently over the net into the right-hand court. Thus your
attention, which would--had you not cultivated a sort of correct
automatonism--have been used up in getting into the left-hand corner,
will be free to observe his change of tactics, and the result is that
you will be far more ready for his new attack than you would have been,
if all your attention had been taken up in getting into position
yourself.
This verbose illustration is necessary to explain a thing that is often
overlooked--namely, the necessity of observing your opponent; and the
more automatic your own preparations are, and the more instinctively
the body works,[16] the more attention you have at your disposal. It
follows, as a corollary, that the less trouble you have to take to meet
the actual attack, the more you can concentrate your mind on your
opponent. The eye should send to the brain the message--“Yorker on the
leg stump,” or whatever it may be--and with _the least possible
expenditure of force, either of muscle or nerve_, the attack should be
met. The more the movements of the body are automatic, the less you will
exhaust yourself. This, in a hard-fought game of racquets, for instance,
is an incalculable advantage.
But in order to ensure this automatic movement there is one thing
absolutely essential, and that is not practice merely, but correct
practice and swift practice. And correct swift practice implies not only
much repetition, but concentration of mind. If you perform a new
movement a hundred times, let us say, without thought, it may be done
correctly, but it cannot be done, if correctly, swiftly. Correctness is
the first essential, as we said in the chapter on exercise, and always
essential; the swiftness in execution comes mainly with practice; so
also does the automatic performance of the correct movement. But it is a
very easy thing to lose correctness as the speed increases, and with a
view to right this we have recommended--after the movement has been
completely understood, and learned in some cases part by part--practice
before a glass.
This, then, is the first essential--namely, to have practised one’s weak
points till, though they are still perhaps weak, they are performed with
the minimum possible of conscious thought, so that one’s attention, as
far as may be, is free to observe the opponent. For a long time before
the match continually practise your weak points, till they become, if
not satisfactory, at any rate fairly easy, and give to your strong
points only that amount of practice which will serve to keep them in
repair, so to speak. At the time of the event, of course, you will use
them as much as you possibly can, and at the same time give your
opponent as few chances as possible of attacking your weaknesses. And
the knowledge that you have a passable defence for such weaknesses, and
can use it with moderate ease, will vastly increase your measure of
confidence, whereas the knowledge that in some one point or so you are
nearly defenceless would cramp and worry you throughout the set.
Again, since in many cases correctness of striking lies between two
opposite faults, it is often useful to practise deliberately the fault
which is opposite to your besetting sin. If, for instance, you do not
use your wrist enough in a certain stroke, practise using it far more
than is in the least advisable; if, on the other hand, you use it too
much, not giving the forearm, for instance, its share in the stroke,
practise the stroke with the forearm alone, keeping the wrist rigid, and
you will often find that you thus attain correctness more quickly than
if you had practised correctness. The longest way round, in fact, is
here the shortest way home.
It is a great fallacy, as we have said before, to suppose that mere
practice makes perfect. Instead of improving, you may be merely
ingraining an existing fault; or, again, practice without briskness and
without full attention given is only practice in sluggishness, and
confirms and strengthens want of concentration. Thus it is always
better, if possible, to practise in short spells, and never go on if you
find your attention irresistibly flags; for not only is such practice no
good, but it encourages slack performance. This inability to attend,
which besets almost everyone for a long or short period during a course
of training, and is the arch-enemy to progress, is often the result of
fatigue, genuine tiredness of muscles or nerves; the eye times a stroke
incorrectly, or the overworked muscles are slow to respond. Now this
condition should have been avoided; and most people who have suffered
from it are perfectly aware that yesterday, or two days ago, they went
on with their practice when something, eye, muscle, or nerve, distinctly
told them: “We have had enough.” However, here the condition is now, and
there is only one remedy--rest. It is a bore, but it is your own fault.
This genuine tiredness must not be confounded with a symptom which
certainly it closely resembles in its effects, but which appears to us
to be really different, and may be treated with success by an opposite
method: the symptom known as staleness. One is not conscious in any way
of fatigue, the practice may easily have not been at all excessive, yet
for the time all briskness is lost. Now though rest is recommended by
many as a remedy for staleness, the opposite treatment--namely,
continuance, if not increase of work--is worth a trial; and if one
steadily and perseveringly plays through an attack of staleness, one
usually emerges from it better than when one went in. It is a point on
which trainers disagree, some recommending, as we have said, an
emollient treatment--namely, rest; others a tonic. But above all, if you
decide, rightly as we think, to play through your staleness, play with
all the concentration and briskness you are capable of, and do not lay
the foundations of a habit of slackness. Your best efforts, it is true,
will produce deplorable results; but if you can harden your resolution
to care nothing about the results, and hammer steadfastly along, an
object of pity to men and angels, you will probably be the better for
it. But if your resolution breaks down, and you relax from the poor best
still possible to you, stop at once, for always and always slack
practice is worse than none.
Another demon that, like the Promethean vulture, tears at the vitals of
the man practising for a special event, or for general improvement, is
the apparent slowness of the improvement, and at times its apparent
complete cessation. Such a man, for instance, with the best intentions
in the world will take out a handful of golf-balls to practise, let us
say, mashie shots on to a green. The mashie is a weakness in his game,
and the resultant positions of the first dozen shots cannot be covered
with the traditional table-cloth. The next dozen perhaps are even less
satisfactory, and at this point he will be wise to ask a candid friend
if he is doing anything wrong; or, if the candid friend is a good
player, to show him half a dozen shots. But it is quite possible that
there is no obvious fault at all--only a general weakness. Then, having
eliminated that most dangerous possibility--namely, of _practising a
fault_, let this assiduous gentleman go on with his practice as long as
he is brisk and attentive, and let him continue it every day for a week.
Then, and this is the work of the demon alluded to, he may honestly
think that he has not improved at all, and be disposed to label the
principle of practice to a hot destination. But we solemnly assure him,
if he has the least aptitude for the game, he quite certainly either has
improved, though he is not conscious of it, or he has at least by his
practice made some necessary steps towards improvement, and this
improvement, when it comes, will probably be more rapid than he has
thought possible. From being a poor performer with the mashie he will
one day suddenly find that the club _has arrived_; that it has
shouldered its way through the other mediocre performers in his bag and
now stands predominant. But two postulates are required: (1) that he
must be capable of improvement, (2) that he practises correctly.
Now this sounds a cheerful gospel, and will perhaps not be readily
believed, especially by the person who is in the habit of telling one
after a foozled mashie-shot that he always foozles with a mashie, and by
way of showing how persevering he is, does not use the club again
throughout the round, but plays improperly with an iron. And here it
might be remarked, that though a match at golf certainly does give one
practice it is by no means an ideal form of practice, any more than a
set of tennis is an ideal form of practice. Indeed, it is even less
ideal; for at tennis there is the fact that you are playing against an
attacking opponent, to observe whom is no small part of the game,
whereas one’s real enemy at golf is not one’s opponent, but one’s own
mistakes. Consequently, with the idea of winning the match one
studiously avoids such strokes as may land one in such a position as to
require the use of a shot which one knows to be weak, whereas in
practice one should, instead of avoiding such a shot, do it a dozen
times and yet another dozen. That is practice, and it is by such
practice alone that the demon of despair is exorcised.
Another rule which applies to practice of all games is that the
practiser should gradually increase the severity of his work, in
proportion as the stroke becomes easier to him, till, long before his
match comes off, he has become accustomed (in games of attack and
defence) to meet a much fiercer attack than he is likely to be subjected
to, and himself to attack with a ferocity which he will probably not
need. This gives him the comfortable feeling during the match itself
that he is playing within his limits. So, also, in golf-practice, let
him by degrees increase the difficulties he must contend against, and no
longer place the ball he wishes to play on to the green in as good a lie
as possible, but in a rather bad one; and if his _bête noir_ is a
hanging ball, let him place for himself--after his initial difficulties
are conquered--a dozen balls that hang not badly, but atrociously badly.
Such practice as this will diminish his dread of such a hanging ball as
he is probably liable to encounter, just because he has been in the
habit of playing infinitely more poisonous ones.
Again, it is impossible to emphasize too much the value of the habit of
sparing oneself as far as possible. You may be pretty certain that when
the event comes off you will need all the nervous and muscular force at
your disposal, and it is well to remember that the amount you have is
but limited, and that although you have to play as effectively as
possible throughout, there are many strokes which can be done with
comparatively little effort in one way, but which if done in another are
exceedingly tiring. For instance, the correct timing of a ball at
tennis, and the bringing forward the weight of the body, using the large
muscle areas to back up the arm, will drive a force or a boast with
greater velocity than could have been attained by the arm alone, while
the contribution towards fatigue and exhaustion thus entailed is
infinitely less than if the forearm and wrist were taxed to their
utmost.
It is the business of every trainer, and so of every one, for each man
is his own trainer to a far greater degree than anyone else can be, to
develop his individuality, and though certain broad rules can be laid
down about the wrong way to do a thing, and in a less degree the right
way, much should be left to natural aptness and facility. For instance,
if a man can easily execute a stroke in a certain way with good results,
it is impossible to say that such is not the right way for him to do it;
for the orthodox “right way” may be very difficult to such a man, and it
is mere waste of time for him to acquire it, if by another method he can
accomplish the same thing easily. Here everyone can find out a great
deal for himself, and since facility in movement is half the secret of
success, he should, if he finds a real difficulty in executing some
stroke in the prescribed way, carefully look about to see if he has not
at his command some other method. It is idle, for instance, for a short,
thick-set man to emulate a long loose swing at golf; he might as well
practise high jump in order to be able to deliver a service at
lawn-tennis from the height at which a taller man can, or practise the
“split,” in order to increase his reach. On the other hand, he has
assuredly some advantage in his shortness that the long-legged man has
not; it is this he must grasp and develop.
Finally, it is probably good for everybody to rest, if not completely,
at any rate very largely, for a day or two before the event; for if a
man is not fit then, it is highly improbable that a day or two more of
severe training and practice will make him fit. On the other hand,
rest--provided he does not fret--will largely increase his fund of
nervous force, and his muscles already in condition will lose not one
atom of their briskness by so short a repose. Again, the danger of
over-training is far greater than that of under-training, and the risk
of staleness or tiredness on the day of your match is far more likely,
and, if it occurs, far more prejudicial to your chances, than the risk
of not being quite at concert pitch. But if a man frets, he loses half
the benefit that the rest would give him, and if he finds he inevitably
does so, it is probably better that he should soothe his jangled nerves
by employment. Yet there is a great, if commonly neglected, preventive
against fretting, and that is the reasonable employment of the brain
during the period of training. Then, when the rest before the event
comes, it is easy to find distraction from the very natural nervousness,
in mental pursuits, whereas if, as often happens, the period of training
has been one of inaction for the brain, except in so far as the training
itself was concerned, it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to
busy the mind with other and intellectual occupations. In fact, if only
for the sake of the tranquil, not fretful, rest of the day or two before
the event, it is well worth while, throughout the period of training, to
have some definite and interesting piece of mental work every day. It
should not, of course, be very exciting or very fatiguing, nor should
the hours of work be so long that together with the physical preparation
they produce fatigue; but nothing is a greater mistake than to drop
brain-work altogether, not only, as we have said, for the sake of the
rest before the event, which is practicably impossible unless the mind
is otherwise occupied, but for the sake of the general flatness and
utter want of interest in things after the day is passed. For the mind
gets flabby and in ill condition if not used, just as the body does,
while its reasonable use even during the most severe physical training
cannot, we believe, have any ill effect at all on the body, for it is
not in the nature of things that it should have; while if it has been
unused for weeks, it is practically impossible to rest, as is strongly
recommended, for a few days before the event, without fretting.
There is a sentence in the Latin grammar: “Too much confidence is wont
to be a calamity.” This is no doubt true, but it must be remembered that
too little confidence is certain to be one; and though to inculcate a
frame of mind is perhaps a useless task, yet there is, as it were, a
correct attitude for winning, just as a straight bat is the correct
attitude for a yorker, and it seems in the main to be this.
Never despise your adversary, but whoever he is treat him with respect.
Cultivate a belief in your chances of winning, but remember that though
you are not beaten till the last set has been finished, or the
eighteenth hole putted into, yet neither is he. Husband your resources,
unless things are positively desperate.
And so good luck to you. But if you have bad luck, remember you are a
gentleman, or, if you are not, that you have an excellent opportunity
for making other people think so.
CHAPTER X.
REMEDIAL.
We have already spoken of the constant need of light, in order that the
body may be healthy, and have suggested some simple rules about the use
of heat, either in Turkish or ordinary baths. But these natural aids to
health may, as we have said, be used as directly remedial agents in case
of disease, or to correct existing bodily defects. Much scientific
investigation has lately been made into the healing properties of
electric light, whether used merely as light, or, as some hold, to put
external electricity into the body; and it has been found to cure, not
only weakness of the system, acting as a tonic, but even such tubercular
diseases as lupus. We should not, however, recommend anyone to dabble
with electricity, still less to go through a course of treatment except
under skilled medical supervision, and this treatment by electricity
comes outside the scope of this book.
Massage and rubbing, however, which can often be performed by a man on
himself, are, for certain complaints, among those simple and excellent
remedies which can safely be practised by anyone.[17] In the case of a
strained muscle, for instance, in muscular rheumatism or lumbago, or
when owing to some accident a man accustomed to exercise cannot get it,
massage and rubbing are invaluable. In the latter case, the massage
ought to be over the whole body, and so must be performed by someone
else; but half the small local injuries which cannot well be avoided,
can be greatly alleviated by such means, while an attack of lumbago or
muscular rheumatism, which without such treatment might incapacitate a
man for a week, can often be entirely got rid of by the employment of
this remedy. The skin should be made soft and pliable by hot water, and
any decent oil or embrocation may be used; not so much, perhaps, because
it is in itself beneficial, but because the rubbing, which is
beneficial, thus becomes easier to the manipulator, and spares the skin
of the patient; for it is impossible to stand more than a minute or two
of dry rubbing, if the rubbing is vigorous, owing to the soreness which
it produces. In the same way, though the cause of lumbago (usually, if
not always, connected with the liver) cannot be removed by massage, yet
massage enormously alleviates the discomfort which often amounts to
really severe physical pain. And half an hour’s massage in the small of
the back, a dose of uric acid solvent with every meal, and an abstention
for a day from meat and alcohol may be sufficient to discharge most
cases at any rate half-cured.
Another remedy we suggest--it is likely to be highly unpopular--as a
cure for a very large number of disorganisations of the digestion or
liver, is complete abstention from food, even for one meal only. For it
is quite possible to be really bilious and yet feel reasonably hungry;
but it is in such a case false to argue that hunger indicates food. In
the same way a slight upset of the liver often induces great drowsiness,
whereas to lie in bed sleeping inordinate hours is quite the worst thing
to do. Nor is there any possibility of mistaking bilious-hunger or
liverish-drowsiness for the healthy forms. It is even unnecessary to go
into the point at all, for everyone knows quite well the difference
between them. So if you are biliously-hungry, fast; if you are
liverishly-sleepy, take exercise. It is possible, of course, that you
need medicine, but try simpler remedies first.
Nervousness, that extraordinarily elusive foe to happiness, may arise
from two causes, either from an overstrung condition accompanied by
excitability, or from exactly the opposite cause--namely, weakness, and
the need for tonic. In the first case--the two, again, are unmistakably
different--it may be useful to try a less stimulating and irritating
diet, and accompany it with plenty of exercise, followed by rest and
muscular relaxation. In the second case, the same alteration of diet,
substituting nourishing foods for the stimulating ones, and plenty of
rest, with perhaps less exercise will be useful. In both cases, of
course, medicine may be needful, but it seems to be almost a postulate
in the question of health, to prefer, if that is sufficient, a
perfectly wholesome _régime_ without medicine, to the continuance of one
that perhaps does not entirely suit you, with the addition of medicine.
Medicine, no doubt, often is useful, and many of the nerve-tonics which
so plentifully bedeck the pages of magazines that one would think that
the Empire had an attack of nervous prostration, _may_ be excellent
medicines. But why take medicine, if as good results can be obtained
without it? It is possible that you must--or at any rate think that you
should--do more work than you can properly stand. If the duty is clear,
and if it is also perfectly clear that you had better cheerfully give up
the chance of working as well as you would like to work, unless you take
a tonic, then by all means take a tonic which you know medicinally to be
a sound medicine; but first see if there is not some possible means,
such as alteration of diet, or, very likely, less stimulant, or a
little regular exercise, of managing without that medicine. Strychnine,
for instance, cannot be called an ideal food even in the smallest
quantities.
Two other very common symptoms of some slight nervous derangement are
restlessness and staleness. By restlessness we mean the disinclination
often amounting to inability to settle down to any one thing. It is a
particularly common symptom of the present day, when many people seem to
be literally unable to have any fixed object of life, or to remain in
the same place for more than a few days together. In acute forms this
becomes a nervous disease of such seriousness that a regular rest-cure
has been often prescribed--and with great success--for it: the patient
goes to bed and stops there for several weeks, and is allowed neither to
read, nor to talk, nor to make the smallest exertion that is avoidable.
And in a less degree for ordinary restlessness the same treatment is
applicable, and an increased allowance of sleep is desirable; or, if not
of sleep, of deliberate rest; for the evil is due to over-excitation of
the nerves without sufficient nourishment. And the nourishment of the
nerves is repose.
Staleness, again, which we may define as a failure of co-operation
between muscles and will, and which is most noticeable in athletic
pursuits (since in ordinary life slight sluggishness in co-operation is
not practically noticeable) arises also from fatigue of the nerves, due
to excessive work, want of nourishment, or monotony of employment. To
take the smallest imaginable instance, supposing two men, well trained
in matters of eye, attempt merely to hit a lawn-tennis ball backwards
and forwards over the net, as easily and gently as possible, they
cannot keep it up for a quarter of an hour. Each stroke is simplicity
itself, less than the A B C of the game. Yet by the monotony and
tiresome iteration of it, their nerves get bored; there is no failure of
muscular power, but they are _unable_ to hit with the minimum of
correctness after a very few minutes. Here is temporary staleness in its
most elementary form, but it is some similar nerve-failure which is at
the root of most staleness; incapability of correct work occurs without
such fatigue of the muscle as would account for it; and to repeat the
metaphor likening the muscle to the receiving instrument in a telegraph
system, and the nerve to the wire through which the message passes, it
may be a failure or a fault in the wire, though the instrument be
intact, and the message (from the brain) be perfectly sent. That
particular wire, or set of wires, must, therefore, be given rest, for
it is mainly by rest that health and power come to nerves. In other
words, change of exercise is required; or, if the whole system is a
little out of gear, complete though temporary rest; or, again, a
nerve-tonic may be needed; light, air, and cold water may set things
right. Or, since the harmonious working together of all the parts of the
body is conducive to correct work by any one nerve, it may be that the
digestion is primarily at fault.
It is in connection with staleness that we may consider that daily and
deadly enemy of strong and vigorous living--namely, Fatigue. If fatigue
were nothing more than the natural and logical outcome of sound and
healthy exercise of mind and body, the question would be simple enough,
and we could take it offhand as one of nature’s danger signals,
enjoining rest. For it is one of the primary postulates that exertion
must be succeeded by rest, and thus fatigue would be only the
instinctive demand of the tired organs. But it will occur at once to
most readers that the feeling of fatigue, anyhow, is in no way
proportionate to the amount of exertion, bodily or mental, that has been
undergone; more than this, bodily exercise, and in many cases mental
exercise, instead of producing, actually seems to remove the feeling of
fatigue. Clearly, then, the mere sensation of fatigue does not
necessarily indicate the need of rest, or sleep, or food. A man,
especially if he has dined late and heavily, may awake in the morning,
even though he has had a good spell of sleep in an ill-ventilated room,
feeling tired. Yet that feeling of tiredness is removed, not by further
dozing, but by exercise, fresh air, or often brain work. But the
contradiction is only apparent; there are, it is true, several forms of
fatigue, but fatigue generally can be properly considered under one
head. It will be necessary, however, to go back to a few simple
physiological principles in order to make this quite clear.
In several of the simplest phenomena incident to life, we are utterly
ignorant of processes. We know, for instance, for certain that we
breathe in air rich in oxygen, and breathe out air full of carbonic acid
gas. We know, again, that the proteid which we eat and digest and
assimilate in our food becomes body-cells. We know that when we use our
muscles we use up these body-cells, break them down and turn them into
waste products; that when we use our brains some similar exertion of
nerve is implicated. How these changes take place we do not know; that
they do take place is absolutely certain, and it is in connection with
these changes that fatigue occurs. A deficiency in the supply of oxygen
given to the lungs is parallel to a deficiency in the supply of proteid
given to the digestion; in both the organs are starved. Thus, to take
the instance already given, the gentleman who feels fatigued in the
morning, had better go out of doors; the longer he lies in his stuffy
bedroom the more tired he will become. This is _one_ of the causes of
the fatigue from which he is suffering--namely, a starvation of his body
in point of oxygen. He would feel fatigued in the same way, if he was
starved in point of proteid. His fatigue, though he has taken no bodily
or mental exercise for hours, and has been resting, is genuine fatigue
consequent on an insufficient supply of oxygen. Therefore, he had better
get out of doors, and take exercise so as to make up the deficit.
This unhappy gentleman whose case we are considering may have other
causes of fatigue as well, even though he never takes any exercise
bodily or mental, and habitually consumes large quantities of solid
food. In fact, it is the food itself, with which he hopes to refresh
exhausted nature, which is very likely tiring to him. He may habitually
overtax his digestive organs, and almost certainly he will have in his
system, owing to his sedentary and gluttonous life, a great quantity of
waste products (among which is uric acid, the father and mother of
gout), which in themselves are causes of fatigue. The system is
clogged--the engine, so to speak, is running laboriously,[18] with all
sorts of grit and refuse hindering the smooth working of its wheels and
bearings. And this fatigue may be called chronic fatigue; as long as the
excess of waste products remain in the system there will be
disinclination for exertion, and fatigue rapidly ensuing on it.[19] The
cure is to get rid of the waste products, as far as may be, by means of
exercise, and by encouraging the system to throw them off by the action
of the skin, the kidneys, and the bowels, and to remove the causes of
the waste products in the future by avoiding those foods which are
fruitful in them.
Now here, again, we find that what we may call healthy fatigue is
surprisingly allied to this gluttonous fatigue, though in most cases,
probably, the cure for one is the opposite to the cure for the other.
The sedentary large-eater we should recommend, broadly speaking, to take
exercise (extreme cases are liable to apoplexy, however), with a view to
getting rid of his waste products. But it is the presence of waste
products, also, which partly, at any rate, cause the feeling of fatigue
in the man who has played a hard set at tennis, for exercise, as we have
said, breaks down the body-cells which become waste products.[20] New
cells, it is true, are, in the case of all healthy people tired with
exercise, even then in process of formation, but the local fatigue of
the muscles is largely due to the presence of these waste products,
which the exercise has produced. Thus, strangely enough, the ignoble
alderman is suffering from a cause closely allied to that which makes
the open champion of the world at any game tired after his brilliant and
successful defence of his title.
It is impossible in the small limits of a section to enter more fully
into the physiology of this fascinating phenomenon, and we must refer
the reader who wishes to know more about it to Dr. Alexander Haig’s work
on the subject,[21] and merely note that in this way exhaustion and so
fatigue are brought about both by a want of food--temporary
starvation--and also by an excess of food which causes excess of waste
products. In the same way, too, though food may be needed, yet to bolt a
heavy meal will not meet the case satisfactorily, since much of the
nourishing value of the foods will be lost, as they will not be given to
the stomach in a form in which it is possible for it to assimilate
them, and also the digestive and excretive organs will be severely
taxed, and fatigue in them will be produced.
As we have said before, fatigue, even when produced healthily, so to
speak--namely by the exercise of muscles in the open air--may be quite
disproportionate to the work accomplished. This question is dealt with
under the chapter on exercise, and it will be sufficient here merely to
mention that the wrong use of muscles (_e.g._, slow heavy movements for
the wrists as in many dumb-bell exercises), or the use of the wrong
muscles, as, for instance, excessive employment of the muscles of the
arm when what is needed is the use of the large body muscles, are common
causes of unnecessary fatigue in games and athletics. There are,
furthermore, many mental causes of general bodily fatigue, for in the
intimate interweaving of mind and body, as we have seen, the one
suffers with the other. Thus worry of the mind, nervousness, depression,
make one feel physically tired, not because the muscles have been used,
but because the nervous energy whereby they work has been exhausted by
mental trouble. Here, if a man can bring himself, by an effort of will,
to take an interest in some bodily or mental pursuit that will draw his
mind off himself and his worry, he will quite certainly be the better
for it, for the nerves that have been wearing and exhausting themselves
over the trouble will have rest. And rest, as we have said before, is to
nerves what food is to the stomach and oxygen to the lungs.
A common result of faulty digestion is a tendency to grow fat. Just as
extreme thinness results from failure to digest food properly and so get
the nourishment out of it, so a certain kind of obesity is likewise a
wrong digestion of food; and though the symptom of “laying on flesh” is
often ignorantly considered a sign of health, it may be distinctly a
sign of bad digestion, if the flesh that is laid on is fatty. Certain
foods, such as sugar and oil, are in themselves fattening; so, also, is
starchy food, even if not properly masticated. An avoidance of excess of
liquid is a good precaution against obesity, if under that word we class
abnormal weight; so also is the habit of making the skin act properly by
baths and exercises; so, too, are exercises for the abdomen, which
facilitate the processes of digestion (though these exercises should not
be employed when the digestion is at work--_i.e._, just after meals).
And everyone should remember that it is far easier to avoid getting fat,
than to stop the process of accumulation of fat when once it has set
in. Prevention here is not only better, but easier than cure. By a
strange perversity of nature, fat people have often a craving for
fattening foods. But this must obviously not be taken as a healthy
instinct; it is an instinct of a diseased condition.
Another common enemy of health is constipation, and it is an enemy
mainly because waste material, which should be ejected, is retained in
the body, and during its retention necessarily disperses a certain
amount of poisonous gases and substances through the body. But it is a
question whether the drugs which many people are accustomed to take
almost daily with a view to its prevention or cure are not as bad in
their effects. And the sad thing is that an enormous amount of such
constipation could be cured by perfectly simple and natural means. Diet
is largely responsible for it; so, too, is the lack of exercises which
facilitate the movements of the bowels. People who suffer from it should
be sparing in their use of stimulants, especially of those which have a
large percentage of alcohol, and in their use of white flour, and of
flesh foods, the place of which should be taken by other foods, such as
brown bread, tomatoes and fruit, fresh if possible, or stewed. These are
without doubt the best preventives, and also the best remedies. Above
all things it is most injurious to get in the habit of relieving
constipation by doses of salts, or of other medicines even less
innocent. The sort of diet which both prevents and alleviates it is a
natural remedy, as also are the bending and leg-raising exercises which
help the action of the bowels. They are worth trying.
But perhaps of all enemies to health, laziness is the most powerful and
the most insidious. The health of any function depends, as Aristotle
said long ago, on its energy; and to be employed is a better drug
against most ills that flesh is heir to, than any that can be found in a
chemist’s shop. Whether it is headache you suffer from, or depression,
or (if your malady is very acute) atheism or gout, the probability is
that work, either bodily or mental, would have prevented it, and that
work, bodily or mental, will cure it. For owing to this reaction of body
or mind on each other, there is no doubt that boredom and discontent
will actually produce indigestion, just as indigestion in the stomach
will actually produce depression of mind. Again, to take a tiny
instance, there are few people who would care to eat their way through a
long dinner alone, but give them cheerful companionship, they will
digest with avidity that which if they ate by themselves they could
barely swallow. So also in bigger matters: occupy your mind always with
any subject that interests it, provided it is not harmful, and as far as
your well-being is concerned it does not matter what this subject is. If
you ever feel bored, you may be quite certain that your boredom is in
ninety-nine cases out of a hundred due, not to the stupidity of others,
but to the stupidity of yourself. Stupidity of that order is one of the
least admirable things in the world; and for the sake of your self
respect try to be a little less of an idiot. However poor you are, it is
probable that most things worth having, even Greek gems and fine music,
are accessible to you, the one at the British Museum, the other at the
Queen’s Hall. Surely there is something in the world which involuntarily
finds its way into your thoughts at vacant moments? Encourage that; work
at it; get to know some thing worth knowing about it. Take a pride in
your body if you will, you might do worse; get to play something
passably; weight-lift even, if you really enjoy it, or if it leads you
to a pride in your physique; do anything to be occupied. For this is the
great remedy of all--work. It is certainly not worth while to sit and
consider how noble you are and what few opportunities you have, nor is
it worth while to sit and consider--except very occasionally--how base
you are and how many opportunities you have. Instead, go and take one of
them. _Do_ something, whether you suffer from headache or atheism, _do_
something, make boots--even very badly like Tolstoi--or make history
like Napoleon, or make geography like Livingstone. Whatever your age is,
there should be something you like, which is not harmful. Do it, with
both hands, for there is health--work!
THE END.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Perspiration, it may also be noticed, regulates the temperature of
the skin by evaporation. Thus on a hot day after we have cooled down
from exercise we feel considerably less warm than before the exercise.
“Text-book of Physiology,” Schäfer, Part I., p. 669.
[2] These exercises, it may be added, bear no claim to be considered
wholly original; many of them, in fact, are taken direct from other
systems, especially the Macdonald Smith system, which can be heartily
recommended; some few we believe are new. They are offered not as final
or complete exercises, but as a selection from the best which we can
give at present. Suggested improvements will be welcomed.
[3] “As certain as it is that a country walk through fine scenery is
more invigorating than an equal number of steps up and down a hall,
so certain is it that the muscular activity of a game, accompanied by
the ordinary exhilaration, invigorates more than the same amount of
muscular activity in the shape of gymnastics.”--Herbert Spencer, in
_Facts and Comments_.
[4] “Many men are attempting to carry the diet of youth on into middle
life and age, or the diet that was quite correct for an active outdoor
life into a life of sedentary office work in a town; or if they fall
into neither of these errors they are generally completely ignorant
with regard to the relative value and importance of foods, so that they
either starve themselves on vegetables or herbs containing little or no
albumen, or, on the other hand, overfeed themselves....”--Dr. Alexander
Haig.
[5] For the question of milk-proteid in general, see _Text-book of
Physiology_ (Schäfer), Vol. I., page 135. For Plasmon, Hovis, and other
simple foods, see _Muscle, Brain and Diet_ (Sonnenschein & Co.).
[6] Though this really belongs to the Pulse family.
[7] On the part played by saliva in digestion generally see _Text-book
of Physiology_ (Schäfer), Vol. I., page 342, &c.
[8] On the excitation of the gastric juices by suggestion only, see
Schäfer, _Text-book of Physiology_, Vol. I., page 349.
[9] “The process of training that has to be undergone by athletes
nowadays is reduced to hard-and-fast rules. That these rules are not
so good or scientific as could be wished is a matter for regret. The
work of training is left to ‘trainers,’ and they are men who, learning
from their predecessors whatever facts were known to them, build up
a code of rules framed largely on imperfect experience, and added on
to by what they themselves have believed to be useful. Medical men of
reliable knowledge and sound professional attainments have seldom lent
themselves to consider seriously the subject of training, and so place
the subject on a sure scientific footing.... Many a man breaks down in
training from being made the subject of some imperfect or unsuitable
_régime_.”--Dr. James Cantlie, in “The Book of Health.”
[10] “To-day we take baths as a matter of course. Apart from the
pleasure of washing and of having washed, we know that soft warm water
can remove ‘the dried-up epidermis or scarf-skin, the deposit of sweaty
and oily matter, to say nothing of the dirt and impurities derived
from the air and the particles rubbed off from our clothing.’ But ‘we
realise with difficulty that the bath was but rarely met with in houses
built even forty years ago. Bathing in those days, and therefore, of
course, swimming, formed no portion of the school curriculum, the
gradual introduction of first one, and then the other, being among the
salutary results of recent educational development.’”--Dr. Malcolm
Morris, in “The Book of Health.”
[11] An open-air treatment can now be had at “Broadlands,” Medstead
(Hampshire).
[12] “Many think with Herbert Spencer [who, however, holds that
‘imperfections of nature may be diminished by wise management’] that
education is useless or almost powerless; that human evolution is ruled
by heredity.... This modern conception, which accords to heredity a
power at least equal to that ascribed by ancient poets to Fate, is
assuredly excessive.... Education may supervene efficaciously; it
succeeds in giving birth to _artificial instincts_ capable of balancing
the hereditary instincts, and even of suppressing them; in short,
of substituting for innate ancestral habit an acquired individual
habit.”--Professors Proust and Ballet.
[13] “In the earliest times of the human race ... to prompt people to
take exercise meant only to induce them to do their daily work. In
later times, however, and especially in the world of to-day as we know
it, the multiplication of industries has placed many classes in such
a position that exercise is something independent of, and has to be
added on to, their daily employment.... The clerk at his desk and the
merchant at his counter; the tailor in his crooked position and the
milliner at her seam; the printer setting up type from morning till
night; the workers, or rather watchers, at manufactories ... have one
and all forgotten that their lower extremities are meant to carry them
about.... Every departure (from the physically active life) may be an
intellectual advance, but a muscular retrocession--a social gain, but
a physical decline. Such being the case, it is evident that a great
change either in the physique, or in the means of obtaining exercise
so as to maintain that physique, must have taken place; and when we
come to look at it we shall find that _but few of the employments of
the present day carry with them a sufficiency of exercise_.”--Dr. James
Cantlie, in “The Book of Health.”
[14] In America the Y.M.C.A. Clubs are, we believe, almost invariably
athletic, if not primarily, at least essentially.
[15] “There is method in walking, method in running, method in raising
a burthen with as little effort as possible. The [correct] practice of
an exercise leads then to a diminution of muscular expenditure, to an
economy of work, whence results an apparent increase of the strength of
man who does the work.”--Dr. Fernand Lagrange, in “The Physiology of
Exercise.”
[16] “After a certain period of study difficult exercises have been
learned, and may then become automatic. Their effects will then be
very different. Is it not quite a different thing to _amuse_ oneself
with dancing from _occupying_ oneself with learning dancing? Dancing,
riding, rowing, even running, when they have long been practised, need
no more [conscious] brain work than walking, which is above all an
automatic exercise.... It actually needs an effort of will to oppose
an action which has become unconscious and to change an acquired
pace.... We see at the first glance the great hygienic superiority [as
increasing the oxygen in the system, removing waste products, relieving
the brain fatigued by intellectual work, &c.] of exercises which can be
performed automatically, with economy of nervous energy, complete [?]
repose of the brain, absolute [?] inaction of the psychical faculties.
The work of the human system is then performed by the coarser parts of
the machine, and fatigue is first felt by the subordinate agents of
movement.
“But for certain bodily exercises the period of apprenticeship is
indefinitely prolonged, and the movements need an increasing guidance
on the part of the nerve-centres and the conscious faculties, because
these movements cannot be constantly identical, and unforeseen
emergencies occur. Fencing can never become an automatic exercise,
notwithstanding the tendency exhibited by certain parries and thrusts
to become habitual actions and to be performed instinctively; the
movement cannot always be performed in the same manner and follow
always the same order, for they are subordinated to those of the
opponent.” Dr. Fernand Lagrange, in “The Physiology of Bodily Exercise.”
[17] Of the value of exercise as a cure, the French nerve-specialists,
Professors Proust and Ballet,[*] speak most emphatically. What they say
about neurasthenics will apply in general to those who feel disinclined
to move:--
“There is in truth no case in which muscular exercise should not
figure under one shape or another.... There is a whole group
of patients to whom it would seem at the first glance that all
muscular work should be forbidden. Complete muscular inaction,
however, would be as injurious to them as exaggerated work, and for
them more than for all others the rule of progressive increase of
work, of slow and methodical training, must be rigorously obeyed.
They are perpetually on the verge of fatigue; their reserve of
motor nerve-energy is, so to speak, _nil_, and the slightest
_voluntary_ movement is enough to exhaust them. Hence the only
muscular work that can be prescribed to them, at first at least,
is that effected by _passive_ movements and _massage_, by which
a whole series of muscular, tendinous, and cutaneous stimuli are
transmitted by the sensory nerves to the cells of the centres
... these stimuli gently arouse the motor centres, and even the
mental image of the movement aids in the same result, that is, in
preserving the functional activity of the centres without tiring
the patient. Besides, passive exercise and massage promote the
peripheral circulation.”
Dr. Weir Mitchell includes these, with faradic electricity, all
three to be increased gradually, in his famous treatment for
nervousness.
[*] “The Treatment of Neurasthenia.” (Published by Henry Kimpton.)
[18] “The need for exercise is one of the numerous sensations which
lead human beings to perform actions necessary for the preservation
of life or health. The need for repose is called fatigue; the need
for exercise has not received a special name, but deserves one quite
as much as hunger, thirst, &c. Under the influence of deficient
exercise, certain materials which should be used up each day by work,
accumulate in the human machine, the wheels of which they encumber, and
the working of which they clog.... It is necessary, for the perfect
balances of nutrition, that the reserve materials should be used up as
fast as they are formed.” Dr. Fernand Lagrange, in “The Physiology of
Bodily Exercise.”
[19] “The fatigue which is due to dearth of albumens (proteid) in
the blood is always absent so long as sufficient food is taken and
digested; in the condition of dyspepsia mentioned in the previous
chapter it was not digested.... If a man who has had a sufficient
supply of albumens put in, and who has a good digestion, yet falls out
in the early stage of a contest, long before those albumens can be
exhausted, we must conclude that his fatigue is due to uric acid in the
blood.” Dr. Alexander Haig.
[20] “Similarly excessive exercise increases the amount of uric acid in
the body.”--_Text-book of Physiology_ (Schäfer), Vol. I., page 595.
[21] _Uric Acid_ (Dr. A. Haig).
*** End of this Doctrine Publishing Corporation Digital Book "Daily Training" ***
Doctrine Publishing Corporation provides digitized public domain materials.
Public domain books belong to the public and we are merely their custodians.
This effort is time consuming and expensive, so in order to keep providing
this resource, we have taken steps to prevent abuse by commercial parties,
including placing technical restrictions on automated querying.
We also ask that you:
+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Doctrine Publishing
Corporation's ISYS search for use by individuals, and we request that you
use these files for personal, non-commercial purposes.
+ Refrain from automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort
to Doctrine Publishing's system: If you are conducting research on machine
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a
large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the use of
public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help.
+ Keep it legal - Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for
ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just because
we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States,
that the work is also in the public domain for users in other countries.
Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we
can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of any specific book is
allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Doctrine Publishing
ISYS search means it can be used in any manner anywhere in the world.
Copyright infringement liability can be quite severe.
About ISYS® Search Software
Established in 1988, ISYS Search Software is a global supplier of enterprise
search solutions for business and government. The company's award-winning
software suite offers a broad range of search, navigation and discovery
solutions for desktop search, intranet search, SharePoint search and embedded
search applications. ISYS has been deployed by thousands of organizations
operating in a variety of industries, including government, legal, law
enforcement, financial services, healthcare and recruitment.