NewsFocus has put together a useful webpage of some important things you
need to know about 9//11. If you've been wondering what all the fuss is
about, but never took the time to look, here's a webpage to get you
going on the inside scoop.

All Americans need to be united together in this endeavor,
because no truer statement has ever been made about our country, "united we stand, and divided we fall." Make no
mistake about it, this was an attack on the United States as we used to know it,
with our Constitution set squarely in the target sight. We are all going to
have to fight together in order to save the democracy that we so
proudly cherished.

Educate yourself on the facts and evidence of
9/11. Once you realize that there is a concerted effort to cover-up the
whole event, you will understand why you've been misled from the start. Learn who was responsible for 9/11 and recognize the changes that have been
forced upon us all. Most of all, become vocal and educate others. More 9/11 info at:NewsFocus
9/11 News

What You Need To Understand About 9/11Over 60 Points To Reconcile From The September 11th EventNewsFocus, by Tim Watts 082809

Click on image for a larger version

Supreme Court appointed
President George W. Bush was neglect in his duties on 9/11. He said he
already knew that a plane had hit the World Trade Center before he
went into the Florida classroom (Booker Elementary), yet
he
said and did nothing when Chief of Staff Andrew Card told him
in certain words, "The second tower has been hit. America is under
attack." Bush decided to stay seated in the classroom,
instead of acting, and kept reading
"My Pet Goat."

The WTC fires were small and
isolated and did not consume the buildings from top to bottom. They
were reported as isolated and capable of being put out with only one or
two hoses.

The FDNY
dispatch
tapes were classified after 9/11 to hide firefighter accounts of no top
to bottom burning in the WTC towers. The
tapes prove there was no
widespread top to bottom burning of either building.

The first time ever that a steel high-rise building was alleged to
collapse was on 9/11. Not only did we have the first ever steel high-rise destruction from fire, but three steel-high
rise buildings all coincidentally fell for the first time ever. What are the
odds?

Active
Nano-thermite (thermate),
an extremely high military-grade explosive cutting charge, was found in many of the samples
of the WTC dust and debris.

Liquid steel was found in the WTC basement,
still molten and red hot for five to six weeks after September 11th.
["As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten
steel was still running." -Leslie Robertson, Chief Structural Engineer,
WTC.]

WTC 1 (hit at 8:46) burned for 102
minutes, yet WTC 2 (hit later at 9:02) burned only :56 minutes, but somehow
WTC 2 fell first. How does this happen, especially when the fuel
burned off immediately in the fireball and there was no top to bottom
burning, of either building?

The China CCTV tower also
burned
far hotter and
also much longer than either WTC 1 or 2, over six hours, and yet, like the Madrid Windsor
tower, it also did not
collapse.

No molten steel was ever found in either
the Windsor tower, nor in the Beijing CCTV building, despite much longer
burning and intensely hotter fires.

An April 3, 2013
Chechnya high-rise fire burned uncontrollably for over a day... a full
29 hours of flaming burn time... and yet NO collapse.... once again.

All three WTC buildings dropped
at near free fall speed, with very little or no resistance at all, as they
passed directly through their own core structure.

WTC 7 dropped
symmetrically,
just like WTC 1 and WTC 2, yet no plane hit it. There were never
any reports of the emergency generator tanks exploding.

Dead bodies were reported in building 7, even
though it was evacuated before any of the other building collapses. (Testimony of Barry Jennings,
emergency coordinator for the New York Housing Authority.)

The 9/11 Commission made no mention
of the WTC 7 destruction in their
final report. Why omit details of a third
building that fell like towers one and two?

Debris and
body parts were
found
on high-rise rooftops, hundreds of feet from the World Trade Center. If the
buildings fell downward, how did the debris and body parts blow upwards and
out, away from towers one and two?

Officials mysteriously made it
illegal for the public to photograph the WTC ground zero destruction after many questionable photos
began to arise. The
camera ban came by order of then mayor Rudy Giuliani. Taking pictures
was no disrespect to the families who lost loved ones, as claimed by
Giuliani.

WTC crime scene material
building evidence was
shipped away to China and destroyed before
any forensic investigation could take place, especially when the steel
capitol of the world was next door in Pittsburgh. So why ship so far away? No real crime investigation
gets rid of the forensic evidence, ever.

Insiders placed stock 'put options'on American and United Airlines due to the 9/11 attacks. The FBI still won't divulge who
made the stock calls or
how they knew that these particular stocks (United Airlines and American
Airlines) would be affected. Who were the investors
who made these put options?

Fake Osama tape released to the
media and the public claiming
responsibility for 9/11. Tape was sanctioned by US intelligence, even though
the figure in the video looked nothing like Osama and was clearly
right-handed. (FBI says he is left-handed on his
wanted poster. They also do
not implicate him for 9/11.) Who found the video? Why did US intelligence
claim it was Osama when it was an obvious phony tape?

Many of the alleged 9/11
hijackers are
still alive, calling into question who was actually involved
in the attacks. How could some within the government falsely accuse these
individuals? If their names weren't on the passenger lists, how did the FBI
immediately come up with the names and the photos so quickly? How were the
terrorist cars found so quickly if their names weren't on the airplane
manifests?
Nine of the alleged hijackers are said to be
still alive.

Newsweek published a
report
with an interview of Mohamed Atta's dad who said that he was called by his
son the day after 9/11. He claims that his son was later killed by the
Israeli Mossad.

No black boxes were ever
produced from the 9/11 rubble, despite being nearly indestructible, made of
titanium, fireproofed and all having electronic locators. (Some news
accounts claim
they were found, but those reports were then quickly
refuted.)

An airplane
jet engine was found in the WTC
debris that does not match the airliners that were alleged to have struck
the buildings.

An airplane
wheel hub was found in
the Pentagon debris that does not match the alleged airliner to strike the building.
They also found a
turbofan that does not match up with a 757.

A few
suspicious pieces of alleged fuselage found on the Pentagon lawn,
however they had the wrong paint scheme for American Airlines. Their planes
are silver based, not light blue. Also, the white stroking was not the
correct size.

Pentagon officials described the
distinct odor of "cordite" lingering in the air. Cordite is a military
explosive.

Like Bush, Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld was derelict in his duty on 9/11. Rather than carrying out
his explicit duty to coordinate a strategic defense during an attack on
American soil,
he went
outside to assist on the lawn. This was clearly not his duty in a
national defense emergency.

The Washington, DC emergency
dispatch tapes are still being withheld from the public. Why?

Why were no wing marks
left on the Pentagon front wall? No wing debris was found on the lawn, nor any wing
markings on the face of the building. How did the windows stay intact
around the impact hole?

How does a hollow aluminum
skinned aircraft, traveling at far less than mach speed, puncture three
rings of the Pentagon, busting through six very thick steel
reinforced concrete walls?

Eyewitnesses, including
two off-duty Pentagon Police officers, claim that the object that hit the
Pentagon
came from the left of the CitGo gas station, not the right, where the
light poles were knocked over. Did two objects strike the Pentagon,
possibly a smaller plane and also a missile?

Numerous
war game exercises
(at least four)
were coincidentally scheduled for 9/11, all of which served to confuse air
traffic controllers. What are the odds?

Military aircraft jets were not
scrambled until after the attacks (9:35am) even though they had been launched at
least
67 times, within :20 minutes or less, during scrambles from the last year.

NORAD was defeated three times on
9/11. Suspiciously, NORAD missed defending the Pentagon also, after already knowing for
quite some
time of the two prior New York WTC attacks. Our air defenses are much
better than this.

What a coincidence that
pilot guns were banned from the cockpit in July of 2001, a little over
one month prior to the 9/11 event.

Who gave the order to evacuate
the White House if the
Secret Service came to take Cheney away and Bush was
still in a Florida classroom? Why would the Secret Service take Cheney and not
take Bush? Who gave these orders?

Why were the
bin Ladens allowed
to fly out of the U.S. on private jets the day after the 9/11, especially
when all other air traffic was grounded? Why the hurry? If Osama bin Laden
was being blamed, why not ask questions, as happens with all investigations?
They could have been protected well enough in Federal custody.

Who was it that told FBI agent
John O'Neill to stop investigating Al-Qaeda?

How could our
Echelon system possibly miss the communications needed to organize such
a major foreign attack? The US denied having such a system in place for
years, until the EU caught them red handed and exposed the entire operation.
(see also:
Executive Order 12333)

What role did
Able Danger play in 9/11? Is it a disinformation campaign to cover-up
that Atta and others were our guys all along? Why was it dismissed? Did some
capitalize on the convenience of terrorists ready to strike the US?

The Pentagon was coincidentally
hit on its 60th anniversary, to the very day. The Pentagon was begun on
September 11th, 1941.

This is only a short list of
oddities and strange coincidences regarding the 9/11 event.

The Pentagon (The
War Department) Broke Ground On 9/11 of 1941We declared war on December 8, 1941,
yet were already planning a War Department.

“Some even believe we (Rockefeller family)
are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United
States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of
conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global
political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that’s the
charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” -David Rockefeller

Time For A Real 9/11 InvestigationIf You Think We Already Had A Thorough Investigation, Think
AgainNewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 020810

This article isn't intended for the 9/11 truth movement as much
as it is for those who still accept the official story. Addressing those who
already believe is simply preaching to the choir. It's time for all
Americans to come together and finally demand a new 9/11 investigation.

Those accepting the official story simply do not realize that
there are numerous, outlandish, incongruities and coincidences to the 9/11 story
that beg for more investigation. Those that are not part of the 9/11 truth
movement naively think that the 9/11 Commission thoroughly investigated
the worst attack ever on American soil. They couldn't be more mistaken.

Many of those who believe the official government version, have
never looked seriously into the evidence from 9/11. In all fairness to the
victims and their families, please review the following in consideration for a new
9/11 investigation:

First off, not only did Bush not want a 9/11
investigation, openly resisting the formation of an independent commission for
441 days, the Bush administration also placed a lot of restrictions
on the investigation right from the start. If the truth was to be found, it
would be exceedingly difficult with the following limitations placed on the
9/11 Commission.

Very little funding provided to find answers.

Timetable placed, limiting amount of investigation.

Limited the scope and extent of the investigation.

Limited the number of Commission members to see evidence.

9/11 Commission co-chair Thomas Kean told the National Press Club
on the 2006 9/11 anniversary that the commission was "set up to fail right from
the start." He cited the lack of funding and investigative time, plus
extreme political duress, as major obstacles in their way.

Thomas Kean: 9/11 Commission Was Set Up To Fail

Both Commissioners, Lee Hamilton and Kean, have
publicly said they were set up to fail.

Co-chair Lee Hamilton adds, "This commission does not have all
the answers."

So, the co-chairs of the very committee assigned to
investigate 9/11 are both in doubt as to the effectiveness of the probe
that they themselves led. This
alone should lead people to realize we need a new 9/11 investigation, one that
is better funded and also open ended in pursuit of the truth, no matter where
it leads to.

Whether you believe the official story or not, the truth is,
there are significant questions that were never addressed at
all during
the investigation. Valid points have been noted, with legitimate questions
raised due to suspicious evidence and significant, substantiated facts from the
event. Much or all of it was never reported by the 9/11 Commission. It is an
undisputable fact that the appointed 9/11 Commission clearly missed a lot of
critical evidence.

Here is but a short list of some of the more glaring points that they missed:

(1) World Trade Center Building 7 Implodes Just Like WTC 1 & 2

Not two, but three towers collapsed in less than :10 seconds on
9/11. The other tower, World Trade Center 7, the Salomon Building, was never hit
by an airplane, yet dropped in perfect symmetrical fashion, much like towers one
and two, falling neatly into its own footprint.

WTC 7 falls quickly and symmetrically, just like WTC towers 1 and
2.

This building is the perfect example of a controlled demolition.
It falls perfectly in free fall, with no resistance. For those that have never
seen building 7 collapse, this should no doubt be highly intriguing at this
point. The thing you may find even more interesting is that the 9/11 Commission
said nothing about this building collapsing in its
final report. Nothing whatsoever.

A 47-story building, not hit by an airplane, collapses just like
the other two towers, in less than ten seconds, and those investigating didn't
feel the need to address WTC 7 in their report? One might think they would, especially since there were so
many important government agencies in that building, yet not one mention in the
9/11 Report. How weird is that?

(2) Dick Cheney Tracked Pentagon Attack Plane 50 Miles Out!

Probably as alarming as the collapse of WTC 7 are the actions of
Dick Cheney after the second tower was hit. Cheney was rushed to the
Presidential Emergency Operating Center (PEOC) by Secret Servicemen immediately
following the attack on the second tower. What is particularly odd is what Cheney did once he
got there.

Cheney shows no emotion whatsoever, nor any surprise as the WTC falls.

DOT head Norman Mineta was also in the PEOC that morning. He
testified under oath that Cheney was tracking flight 77 from well over 50 miles out,
before it hit
the Pentagon. According to Mineta's 9/11 Commission testimony:

"During the
time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a
young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, 'The
plane is 50 miles out.' 'The plane is 30 miles out.' And when it
got down to 'The plane is 10 miles out' the young man said to
the Vice President, 'Do the orders still stand.' And the Vice
President turned and whipped his neck around and said, 'Of
course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the
contrary?'" Testimony of U.S.
Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta before the 9/11
Commission. (5/23/03)

Even with 1960's missile technology, the military could have
easily shot that airplane down from that distance. Easily. So why wasn't
it then? Why did the young man question Cheney's order and why did Cheney
get so upset when he was asked about it?

Was the order Cheney gave a stand-down order? Why was the plane
never pursued or shot at, let alone shot down? Again, Cheney tracked it from the command
center from well over 50 miles out!

Just as importantly, if Cheney tracked the object for that
long, why didn't he have the Pentagon evacuated?
There were 184 innocent people killed as a result of that attack and his
negligence. Why hasn't anyone asked Cheney about this?

How does the 9/11 Commission fulfill its investigative duty with no challenge
or follow up to Norman Mineta's testimony regarding Cheney tracking the plane on radar?

(3) High-Tech Military Explosives Residue Found

A group of noted scientists and researchers has found conclusive
evidence of explosive residue within four separate dust samples from the WTC
site. The substance found was thermate, a high tech version of thermite,
an advanced military explosive that requires a security clearance. Engineered by the military,
thermate is combustible at much lower temperatures than thermite, plus it burns
far hotter, making it an effective cutting charge for steel beams.

Super-thermite, or military grade thermate, has been found in the
WTC dust.

The scientists found not only spent thermate residue, but also
active thermate, not yet ignited. Why there would be thermate mixed in
with the WTC debris is a very good question to ask someone.

The thermate story has been out since 2009, but for some reason,
those within the major mainstream corporate media never addressed it at all,
even though many network anchors initially reported that the destruction looked
exactly like a controlled demolition.

Each tower dropped in :10 seconds or less. Even though military
thermate evidence has been found that supports the theory of a controlled
demolition, the government continues to deny requests to re-open the
investigation.

Why?

The government has failed to enlist or join in any collaborative
efforts with those independent scientists who discovered the material, to
officially test and verify the scientific thermate findings. That in itself is
quite telling.

This one single piece of evidence all by itself ought to be
enough to open a new 9/11 investigation. Finding a high-tech military grade
explosive is clearly something to stand up and take note of.

For the record, NIST says that it did not bother to perform any
tests at all for explosives residue.

So much for a thorough investigation.

(4) Many Of The Alleged Hijackers Are Still Alive

Many of the alleged 9/11 hijackers are
still
alive and well, living in the middle east.
This has been well established already by the BBC and other foreign news media.
Anywhere from six to nine are said to be alive. Many have been found by the
media, which leads to the
trillion-dollar question, if these Saudis didn't do it,
then who did?

These alleged hijackers are still alive and well.

Many do not even know this fact and still think the original
suspects are guilty to this very day. That isn't exactly setting the truth
straight for the official record.

You would think that this would concern someone in the
government. Aren't we trying to find all those responsible for the 9/11 event?

If these guys didn't pull off the 9/11 hijackings, then who
did?

If not them, then who was responsible for the 9/11 attacks?

(5) The Right-Handed
Fake Osama Video That Claims Credit For 9/11

One of the most glaring pieces of evidence
pointing to a cover-up of 9/11 is the release of a particular
video, so obviously fake, that one has to wonder about
the people working at our intelligence agencies that sanctioned
it.

The
face alone ought to be enough to convince anyone that indeed
this is a bad Halloween impersonation, however, the purported
Osama also makes a major telltale gaffe in the video,
revealing this calculated attempt at deception... the
imposter eats, drinks, writes and gestures,
all with his right
hand.Again, this is an obvious key point
since Osama is left-handed. (see:
FBI Wanted Poster )

Pause
the video at 32:44. Watch it again from 33:01 through 33:08. The
guy in the video is clearly right-handed, not left.

How stupid can you be when trying
to fake a video impersonation of Osama?

How stupid, or complicit,
does this make the media look for selling this obvious video
fake to the public? Out of all the news agencies, not one single
person caught this? Not even one intrepid reporter?

NewsFocus has posted the fake
Osama video online for downloading at the link pasted below. It
is 32.6 MB in size will take some time to download, depending on
your modem speed.

(Note: The video is in
RealPlayer format, but will be available in another format
soon.)

After watching the
video, ask yourself how the
media missed this obvious con job?

Is this blatant
incompetence by every single media outlet, or is it collusion in
a national cover-up?

It
should be noted that immediately following 9/11, Bin Laden sent
a message stating adamantly and unequivocally that he was not
involved in the attacks.

So why is someone faking Osama
videos to claim that he is responsible?

Why
did the Bush administration pass off an obvious fake
imposter to the media as the real Bin Laden? Was it because they purposefully
wanted to fan the fears of the American people, so that the
administration could bankroll their war agenda?

Spot The ImposterReal Osama (L) and the fake Osama (R).

By the way, if you look at the FBI
Most Wantedposter for Osama, you should note that he
is not wanted in connection with 9/11. The FBI
only wants him for other crimes, the August 7, 1998, bombings of the
United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi,
Kenya.

No 9/11 hijackings
are mentioned, as well as no World Trade Center attacks,
and no Pentagon attack charges. None whatsoever.

In New York City, a jet engine was found that is said to not
be typical of
a 757 aircraft.

In the Pentagon, a wheel assembly and a jet turbine were found that were
also reported to not to be from a 757.

Where did these non-757 parts come from?

Did something else strike the WTC towers and the Pentagon?

Numerous military and aviation officials have said emphatically
that a 757 could not have flown the impossible maneuvers that the attacking DC
craft performed over the Pentagon. Air Traffic Control operators are on record
as saying they thought they were witnessing a military aircraft on their
screens, due to its precision high-speed aerobatic movement.

New York City - jet engine found, not matching a 767.

Washington DC - small turbine found, not matching a 757.

The existence of physical evidence that does not fit the
perceived nature of the crime is troubling and begs for more investigation. To
dismiss these pieces of evidence out of hand would be tantamount to ignorance or complicity.
If these pieces don't add up or make sense with the official story, then we need
to know why.

Re-Open The Investigation

Any one of these five reasons ought to be enough to warrant
re-opening the 9/11 investigation. How these points can be accepted in their
totality without a call for a new investigation is unconscionable.

These are merely the glaring omissions, only a few of the many
incongruities and coincidences that we have been told to swallow as part of the
official story.

Questions such as these should call for an immediate re-opening of
the 9/11 case and begin an all new investigation into the event.

Other Tenable 9/11 Observations & Questions

Aside from the
top reasons given for re-opening the 9/11 investigation, there
are also many other irreconcilable issues to address when it
comes to the official story. Combined with the first five
reasons above for a new investigation, the following extra points from
the event should lend further merit for consideration.

1

Impossible for buildings to fall that fast,
unless controlled demo.

2

Kerosene
and office furniture are incapable of creating temps to melt
or soften steel. Yet we had rivers of molten steel for nearly two
months after 9/11, even after being doused repeatedly with
water.

3

No fires
affected the lower floors of either WTC 1 or 2.

4

Not one, but
three steel frame high rise buildings free-fell within seconds into their own
footprints, for the first time ever in history.

5

Physically impossible
for a hollow aluminum plane to fly through three
rings of solid steel reinforced concrete at the the
Pentagon.

6

Three rings
of the Pentagon were breached. (Was this a missile?)

7

No wing impact or engine marks on the face of the
Pentagon.

8

No large plane parts found at Pentagon or
in Pennsylvania.

9

Debris field scattered in Pennsylvania over
six to eight miles.

10

Four coincidental terrorist war games
scheduled on the same day.

11

NORAD defeated three times. (assuming
they took out flight 93)

12

DC emergency dispatch tapes and video are still classified.

13

The emergency fuel tanks were never reported
to blow at WTC 7.
What caused the collapse with only a few small fires
burning?

Damning 9/11 Circumstantial Evidence To Consider

As if these questions of
themselves aren't enough, we also have the following disturbing
facts to reconcile, including elected
officials who were arguably derelict in their duties on 9/11.
Our top officials did not react as they were supposed to
in regards to a national emergency, especially with the nation
under attack. The inaction of each of these figures had a
discernable effect on the reaction of our government during a
time of attack on our country. (For one figure, it wasn't
inaction as much as it was an admission that brought scrutiny in
his direction.) The fact that so many key high ranking officials
are noted as being grossly neglect in their official duties to
the nation, is what is suggestive to many from around the world
of a powerful inner cabal within our government.

Please consider the following:

Fact:
George W.
Bush sat in a Florida classroom and was derelict of duty as Commander in
Chief while we
were under attack. He gave no orders to Chief of Staff
Andrew Card. Bush said and did absolutely nothing. The
leader of the free world had just been told that for the first time
since our nation’s independence, the mainland of the United
States of America was under attack, yet he just sat there. He even did
a short photo-op with the teacher afterwards, so he was clearly in no
hurry whatsoever to see if we were being attacked anywhere
else, like maybe Chicago or Los Angeles, or perhaps even Washington
DC.

Fact:
Donald
Rumsfeld left his post and was derelict of duty, going
outside instead, to the Pentagon lawn, sure to be
photographed to corroborate his critical absence from the
command loop. Rumsfeld had no business being away from the
war room, where his official duty was to direct an effective defense of the
nation. In light of the military
personnel there, the single presence of Donald Rumsfeld on the
Pentagon lawn helping out with a stretcher did not add to the rescue
effort, however his single detraction from the chain of command was an
egregious breach of military protocol, directly impeding the
proper defense of the country during an attack.

Fact:
Dick Cheney was in the the Presidential Emergency
Operations Center (PEOC) bunker beneath the White House on the
morning of 9/11. Cheney was rushed there by Secret Service
agents after the 2nd plane hit. DOT
Secretary Norman Mineta testified before the 9/11 Commission
that Cheney tracked the Pentagon attack plane from well over 50
miles out, before it had struck. Even with 1960's missile
technology we could have blown that plane (missile) out of the
air easily, but Cheney didn’t. When pressed by a young man as to
whether the orders still stand, Cheney became visibly
angry and whipped his neck around declaring, “Of course the
orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?”
It wasn't too long after that the Pentagon was hit. (See video
farther below)

Fact: Rudy Giuliani told ABC's Peter Jennings live on the
air that he was told the World Trade Center was going to collapse, but he now
steadfastly denies he was ever told this. Why would Giuliani publicly claim that
he was told the buildings would collapse and then refute that admission later,
as if he never said it? He plainly stated to ABC, "We were told the World
Trade Center was going to collapse." This is an alarming statement
since no one had any way to know the buildings would collapse, considering this had never ever happened before. In light of the fact that the fires
burned only a short duration (20 minutes or less) and there were no fires below
the 78th floor to undermine the entire structure, it is hard to understand how
anyone could have possibly known the buildings were going to implode and
collapse. One can only surmise this is the reason why Giuliani now vehemently denies being
forewarned about the WTC destruction. (see video farther below)

Fact: FEMA was in New York City the night before the 9/11
attacks. FEMA worker Tom Kenney told CBS's Dan Rather, "We're currently, uh,
one of the first teams that was deployed to support the city of New York for
this disaster." Note that Kenney says they were deployed for this
particular disaster. He also said, "To be honest with you, we arrived on
late Monday night (9/10) and went into action on Tuesday morning." FEMA now
says it was actually in town for a terror drill on the pier, strangely enough,
scheduled for the day after 9/11. (More of those opportunistic war games, terror
drills etc, that were all coincidentally planned around a real terrorist
strike.) The arrival of FEMA in New York City the night before 9/11 is a
disturbing revelation to many.

Who Profited From 9/11 And Its Initiated After-Effects?

The
most common principle of all in the investigation of large
crimes is to ask, who benefited? As Watergate informant 'Deep
Throat' once told Washington Post investigative reporter Bob
Woodward, "follow the money." That reasoning is most
always still valid when it comes to high crimes, but not all
nefarious endeavors are so easily tracked, especially in cases
of state sponsored activity. Power and control are also an
integral part of the equation.

So
with these thoughts in mind, who truly did benefit from 9/11?

The
United States (new strategic middle east foothold, with oil &
gas)

The
military industrial complex (hundreds of billions in war
profits)

Department of Defense (budgets greatly increased)

U.S.
intelligence services (budgets greatly increased)

PNAC
(policies for U.S. world dominance furthered)

Larry Silverstein (received $4-billion in insurance money)

Put
Option Investors (Alleged CIA investors made fortunes)

Bush
family (Oil
investments, Carlyle Group war profits)

Dick
Cheney (Halliburton war profits)

Israel (U.S. fights its enemies for them)

And
who were the biggest losers from 9/11?

Afghanistan people (citizens murdered, country ravaged)

Iraqi people (citizens murdered, country ravaged)

U.S.
people (Constitutional rights taken with Patriot Act)

Those
involved in any orchestrated profits from this deviously
engineered tragedy clearly have no moral scruples, nor any human
integrity. Their avarice will one day
surely be their
undoing.

Just How Far Would Someone Go?

Many falsely believe that factions within our government could
ever run amuck and pull off such outlandish feats of aggression for political or
intelligence gain.

When people of power and great wealth collude together for empire
and profit, beware, for big lies will be told in order to sell a false
illusion, one which all but ensures the success of their plot and guarantees
their profit.

Fortunately we have some damning instances, the ones that were
caught, where we now have official documentation on record, proving not only
their existence, but of an even larger government role.

Gulf of
Tonkin Attack: This was
staged to falsely push the U.S. into the Viet Nam war, killing tens of
thousands of Americans and Vietnamese.

Operation Northwoods: United States document that planned for the
shooting down a civilian U.S. airliner and blaming it on the Cubans so that we
could go to war against them.

Iraq War Invasion: Bush and Cheney lied about weapons of mass
destruction (WMD)
in Iraq so that we could overthrow our own installed puppet, Saddam Hussein in a
war for oil, basing rights, and the dollar.

Some might readily say that these attacks weren't planned against
the U.S. which would be true, but that tends to easily dismiss the thousands
of young men and women that we send to needlessly die for us in
fabricated wars for empire and profit.

This is all done based on either a total political lie, or else a
U.S. alphabet agency-backed coup. More often than not, a combination of
both. In these consciously manufactured, immoral plans, many hundreds of
thousands, if not millions of innocent civilians are killed... murdered,
due to an illegal war for profit and empire.

The fact is, as documented above, it is clearly very possible
for factions within our government to misuse power and authority in order to
support a contrary ideology, or the direct benefit of an elite order or a select
few. With but a few lies exposed in the light for all to see, it makes you
wonder how many lies and secrets we haven't caught on to yet.

To point out the obvious, we've used 9/11 as an excuse for
illegal wars of aggression with Afghanistan and and Iraq, based upon plans
already drawn up before 9/11. As a result, the U.S. has obtained invaluable and
long desired gas and pipeline routes that will reap profiteering oil
corporations literally trillions in oil profits.

So to frivolously discount any inside government complicity or
intelligence help, just because it sounds unbelievable, is foolish. As history
has always shown, people will do anything for money.

In Summary...

With the preceding points in mind, most by now should begin to
understand the call from
51% of Americans
who are already calling for a new 9/11 investigation. Yahoo! reports that the
9/11 topic has become the
all-time top search ever in their short history. Many people in the
United States and around the world are seeking the truth through internet news
sites because they simply do not buy the official story, and they don't trust
the mainstream corporate media when it comes to 9/11 truth.

It is absolutely impossible for "we the people" to
accept the 9/11 Report and have the complete truth when the 9/11
Commission did not look at all the facts, nor the evidence in its
entirety. It is readily apparent that a new investigation is very much necessary
and justified in order to address legitimate questions and concerns that remain
over 9/11 evidence. Not only do we owe it to ourselves to find the truth, we owe
it to the surviving 9/11 family members for proper closure.

No true American should stand in opposition to the people of the
United States concerning the pursuit of truth when it comes to unanswered questions
dealing with 9/11. The
fact that there are many important points overlooked by the previous
9/11 Commission is disturbing in itself, but to let them go without further scrutiny
would be far worse.

The 9/11 event is a story that most Americans don't know as well
as they might think, due in large part to the corporate media who have failed miserably in
their duty to investigate and report. The story needs to come out, no matter
where the chips fall.

The observations raised in this article are indeed legitimate concerns
that need to be addressed and fully investigated to get the complete picture of
what actually happened on 9/11. Considering the seriousness of the many questions still
unanswered, anything less than a new 9/11 investigation would be morally
negligent on our part, not to mention an inhumane response from an intelligent,
civilized society.

This time, don't just ask for a new 9/11 investigation. This
time, demand a real 9/11 investigation.

No matter where the evidence trail leads, it's time to finally
answer the unanswered and bring all of those responsible to justice.

DOT Head Norm Mineta Testifies To The 9/11 Commission On Cheney

This is very damning testimony. The plane could
have been easily shot down.

Giuliani Discrepancy In 9/11 Warning Of WTC Collapse

These are two totally different accounts from Giuliani.

They Say That A Picture Is Worth A Thousand WordsIt would take an extreme force to propel this steel
laterally, hundreds of feet.

"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The
New York Times, Time magazine, and other great publications
whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their
promise of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been
impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had
been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those
years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to
march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty
of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable
to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."- David Rockefeller, 1991 Bilderberg
speech.

Bush Struggles With Excuse For Testifying To
9/11 Commission

Bush and Cheney were expressly asked to
testify separately, but they refused.

Saving America: The Necessary Steps To Reclaim Our Democracy"We the people" Need To Insist Upon Restoring The Vision Of
Our ForefathersNewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 122609

Election Reform - Get rid of Political Action Committees
(PACs) and corporate donations.

Media Reform Break up media monopolies and encourage
diversity of news and opinion.

Take over the Federal Reserve Return
power to print money to U.S. Government.

Balance the Courts We should not lean left or right, but
strike a fair balance in our courts.

Tax Reform Make the rich pay their share accordingly, as we
do, with no more loopholes.

Google And YouTube appear to be going out of their way to
hide the truth, otherwise they would not continually keep pulling down "key" evidence
videos. These videos are clearly "Fair Use" news accounts, all publicly
aired. For YouTube to keep pulling videos only proves to many that they have
no interest in the truth about 9/11 coming forward. Google has been alleged to be a CIA
organization, much like Facebook. People need to quit supporting these
corporations. Use Vimeo instead of YouTube. Use Bing instead of Google.
We all need to sue Google for privacy invasions regarding their
photographing and posting our private property on their commercial "for
profit" map site. It's time that we all stand up to Google and Facebook for
their repeated misuse of our private information.

More Bomb Reports: Let's
See How Long They Leave This Up

Do a search for 9/11 Bombs

9/11 Hero William Rodriguez Tells of Bombs Going
Off

9/11 Revisited (Ver I)

9/11 And Uncle Sam
Let's get one thing straight... we do not forget until the guilty are
prosecuted.

Dark Legacy: 9/11

The Men From Building 7

Aside from the disorienting production effects
at the start, this is very interesting.

What Americans Actually Know About 9/11It Is Arguably Pathetic What
Many People Do Not KnowNewsFocusSadly enough, most
people around the world know more about 9/11 than most
Americans. While more than 42% of Americans believe the U.S.
government may have had foreknowledge of the event, few really
know the actual details as well as our foreign friends.

Very few know there were three skyscrapers
dropped in free-fall fashion that day, with the third building
never being hit by an airplane.

When people don't understand the basics facts
of the event, it's easy to see how the other irregularities of
the attacks go unnoticed.

What Americans Really Know About
9/11Question: How many buildings fell
on 9/11?

Survey: Part 1

Survey: Part 1

The Death Star
versus 9/11

College Humor hits this one out of the park.
"Spot on" parody. Awesome satire.

New York
Times / CBS Poll: 81% of Americans Think US Untruthful Over 9/11Only 16% Believe The US Government Is Telling The
Truth Over Alleged AttacksNewsFocus.org - 101406

A New York Times/CBS
News poll shows that 81% believe that the United States government is
not telling us the truth or is lying about the 9/11 attacks. Only 16% of
Americans think the government is telling the truth about 9/11 while 3%
are uncertain. The actual poll can be found
here.

"Do you think members of the
Bush Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth
but hiding something, or are they mostly lying?

Telling the truth 16%

Hiding something 53%

Mostly lying 28%

Not sure 3%"

Why Did Building 7 Also Collapse In A
Free Fall?The building fell in 6.5 seconds,
however, it was not hit by a plane.

Senior Bush administration officials sternly
cautioned the 9/11 Commission against probing too deeply into the terrorist
attacks of September 11, 2001, according to a document recently obtained by the
ACLU.

The notification came in
a letter dated January 6,
2004, addressed by Attorney General John Ashcroft, Defense Secretary Donald
H. Rumsfeld and CIA Director George J. Tenet. The ACLU described it as a fax
sent by David Addington, then-counsel to former vice president Dick Cheney.

NewsFocus: How can you have a thorough investigation if you're told
not to entertain one potential aspect of the crime, the possible influence of
state sponsored assistance. The fact that the 9/11 Commission was told not to go
down that road means... hey, there must be something down that road.

Call, write, or email your Congressman. It is time for a
real 9/11 investigation.

Was It A Real 9/11 Investigation?

Bush refused to hold a full investigation of the 9/11 attacks for over
a year, 441 days. (Sept 12, 2001 to Nov 26, 2002) The Pearl Harbor
investigation took only 11 days to begin.

9/11 Commission investigation eventually spent a meager $15-million
for the worst crime ever committed on American soil. Absolutely shameful.

9/11 Commission Stonewalled
By The CIAAn Op/Ed From 9/11
Commission Members Kean And Hamilton New York Times,
by THOMAS H. KEAN & LEE H.
HAMILTON - 010210More than five years ago, Congress and
President Bush created the 9/11 commission. The goal was to
provide the American people with the fullest possible account of
the “facts and circumstances relating to the terrorist attacks
of Sept. 11, 2001” — and to offer recommendations to prevent
future attacks. Soon after its creation, the president’s chief
of staff directed all executive branch agencies to cooperate
with the commission. ...

As official videographer for the U.S. government,
Kurt Sonnenfeld was detailed to Ground Zero on September 11,
2001, where he spent one month filming 29 tapes: "What I saw
at certain moments and in certain places ... is very
disturbing!" He never handed them over to the authorities
and has been persecuted ever since. Kurt Sonnenfeld lives in
exile in Argentina, where he wrote "El
Perseguido" (the persecuted). His recently-published book
tells the story of his unending nightmare and drives another
nail into the coffin of the government’s account of the 9/11
events. Below is an exclusive interview by The Voltaire
Network. .... (read
more)

The Experts Said...

Fire Engineering Magazine... "No
steel building has ever been destroyed by fire. The (World Trade Center)
investigation was a half baked farce."

Underwriters Laboratories... I think we can all agree
that even un-fireproofed steel will not melt until reaching red-hot
temperatures of nearly 3000F (2). Why Dr. Brown would imply that 2000F would
melt the high-grade steel used in those buildings makes no sense at all. ...This
story just does not add up. If steel from those buildings did soften or
melt, I’m sure we can all agree that this was certainly not due to jet fuel
fires of any kind, let alone the briefly burning fires in those towers. That
fact should be of great concern to all Americans.
--Kevin Ryan,

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) admitted...
“the specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to
collapse remain unknown at this time.”

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)...
admitted that due to “the tremendous energy released by the falling
building mass, the building section came down essentially in free fall.”

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)... asked by a reporter (Jennifer Abel of the
Hartford Advocate) why they did not look for evidence of explosives. NIST
stated: “If you’re looking for something that isn’t there, you’re wasting
your time … and the taxpayer’s money.”

Who
Benefited From 9/11?
As The Old Saying Goes, 'Follow The Money'NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 010110

The
most common principle of all in the investigation of large
crimes is to ask, who benefited? As Watergate informant "Deep
Throat" once told Washington Post investigative reporter Bob
Woodward, "follow the money." That reasoning is most
always still valid when it comes to high crimes, but not all
nefarious endeavors are so easily tracked, especially in cases
of state sponsored activity. Power and control are also an
integral part of the equation.

So
with these thoughts in mind, who truly benefited from 9/11?

The
United States (new strategic middle east foothold, with oil & gas)

The
military industrial complex (hundreds of billions in war profits)

Department of Defense (budgets greatly increased)

U.S.
intelligence services (budgets greatly increased)

PNAC
(policies for U.S. world dominance furthered)

Larry Silverstein (received $4-billion in insurance money)

Bush
family (Carlyle Group war profits)

Dick
Cheney (Halliburton war profits)

Put
Option Investors (made a fortune off 9/11)

Israel (U.S. fights its enemies for them)

And
who were the biggest losers from 9/11?

Afghanistan people (citizens murdered, country ravaged)

Iraqi people (citizens murdered, country ravaged)

U.S.
people (Constitutional rights taken with Patriot Act)

Those
involved in the profit clearly have no moral scruples, nor any
human integrity. Their avarice will eventually one day be their
undoing.

How Could The Secret Be Kept?

Many opponents of the 9/11 truth
movement say that thousands of people had to be involved for the
9/11 event to be an inside job. How could they all keep an
inside job a secret?

First off, the 9/11 naysayers are
the group claiming thousands were involved, not the 9/11
researchers. To be quite honest, you don't need a fraction of
that number to pull off the 9/11 event. All you need is a small
number of people to initiate the main event, allowing that to be
the misguided catalyst for the rest to blindly follow in an act
of defense and patriotism. All you need would be a small crew
with enough time to set up the three affected WTC buildings,
some people on the inside in air traffic control, as well as a
few major figures in government and the military.

The key is to have top officials
in the loop who possess the power to have people obey and follow
them without question.

Larger events have been
kept secret for far longer than 9/11.

The Manhattan Project
employed thousands, but strict military compartmentalization
kept everyone in the dark, allowing information on a need to
know basis for each particular aspect of the project. Even
Truman didn't know until the death of FDR.

The Gulf of Tonkin
Incident never happened, but it was
the impetus for scaling up U.S. efforts in the Viet Nam war.
Many had to know of the ruse, yet we have only learned recently
that it was now fake.

The F-117 and B-2
stealth plane projects were kept
secret for nearly twenty years, giving rise to countless UFO
sightings that had nothing to do with extraterrestrial activity.

The Federal Reserve
System has been kept from many
Americans since 1913. Many are indeed aware that it is not owned
by the U.S. government, but most people have no clue whatsoever.

Operation Mockingbird
was a CIA endeavor for the sole purpose of controlling and
manipulating the U.S. and world media. Very few, if any, know of
its existence even now.

These are but just a few
of the known instances where secrets were kept by many for a
very long time. How many national secrets do you suppose still
exist today that we know nothing about?

Many people in general only care
about themselves and their own immediate needs. As a species, we
are quite gullible and often far too trusting when it comes to
our politicians and the government that we allow them to run on
our behalf.

Those in positions of high power
and our military surely laugh at the notion that secrets and
clandestine events cannot be withheld from the greater public.

Let us never tolerate outrageous
conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September 11th; malicious lies
that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away
from the guilty. --George W. Bush, US President

And I remember getting a call
from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure
they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, ya know, we've had
such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is.. is pull it.
And they made that decision to pull, andthenwe
watched the building collapse.
--Larry
Silverstein, WTC Leaseholder

During
the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young
man who would come in and say to the Vice President, 'The plane is 50 miles
out.' 'The plane is 30 miles out.' And when it got down to 'The plane is 10
miles out' the young man said to the Vice President, 'Do the orders still
stand.' And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said,
'Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?'
--Norm Mineta, Secretary of Transportation

I
was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I
have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government
within the United States. The United States should try to trace the
perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make
the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity.
That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. ...
The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority
is Israel, not the United States. --Osama bin Laden

Of Course President Bush knew about the
impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people
because he needed this war on terrorism. His daddy had Saddam and he needed
Osama. --Colonel Steven Butler, Defense Language Institute,
Monterey, CA, May 26, 2002 (BBC
article)

QUESTIONS I WOULD LIKE TO ASKIf I Could Ask A Question Or Two From Those
Involved In 9/11NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 020910

If I could give truth serum to those involved in
9/11, this is what I would ask:

Dick Cheney: What was the order the young man questioned
and why wasn't the plane shot at, nor shot down?

George W Bush: Why did you sit in that classroom when you
knew the country was being attacked and you presumably had no idea how many
cities or attacks were involved?

Donald Rumsfeld: Why did you leave your office and neglect
your duty while America was under attack?

Larry Silverstein: Building seven was evacuated early that
morning and there were no firemen allowed inside to fight any fires. Why did you
recant your infamous "pull it" comment from the PBS TV special on 9/11?
What is
the name of the fire department commander you spoke with that day?

George HW Bush: What were you doing in the White House the
night before 9/11, even though your son was in Florida?

Unnamed FAA Manager: What was on those audio
interview
tapes with the
New York air traffic controllers that you had to destroy the
tapes completely and sprinkle the remaining pieces in separate garbage cans?

Rudy Giuliani: Who was in the Mayor's Emergency Command bunker
in WTC 7 on the morning of 9/11? Who told you the World Trade Center was going
to collapse?

These are but just a few questions that beg to be
asked and need to be answered. With many notable points overlooked by the 9/11
Commission how can we say that we have the whole truth? That is not only a
preposterous thing to say, it is quite arrogant and just plain ludicrous.
Alarmingly enough, there are too many
9/11 incongruities that still need to be
examined closer with more objective scrutiny. You can't find the truth if you
don't look.

Don't just demand a new 9/11 investigation,
demand a real 9/11 investigation.

It is said that the United States had
over 50 warnings of impending terrorist attacks, yet the
Bush administration sat idly by and did nothing to prevent
them. Ask yourself, why?

Many now say the Bush administration did
do something, they positioned themselves to manipulate
and use the event to bring about more Federal power over
the people and to neuter the Constitution through the use
of...

Patriot Act

Patriot Act II

Homeland Security

Military Commissions Act

Out of these attacks they gained...

More Federal and Presidential power

War in Afghanistan

War in Iraq

Never ending nebulous War on Terror

Trillion$ for the defense
industry

And yet there are still the naive and
ignorant who ask the foolish question, "Why would
anyone or any group within our government possibly do this? What could they
possibly have to gain from the 9/11 attacks?"

Throughout
history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted; the
indifference of those who should have known better; the silence of
the voice of justice when it mattered most; that has made it
possible for evil to triumph.-Haile
Selassie

Despite the
differing opinions and countless theories which have been discussed
and argued about concerning 9/11, one thing is painfully clear, this
event was very well planned, with skilled military precision and
strategic execution. This wasadaring
conspiracy of
monolithic proportions, outrageous in its temerity. Whoever was
behind the planning was certainly no rookie. Clearly there was big
money behind the operation, but more importantly, there was quite
obviously a very high degree of skilled intelligence involved.

Whether that intel was
foreign military or state sponsored, it was indeed a valuable key in
the success of the 9/11 attacks, an event which has become the
catalyst of constitutional change, not only for the people of the
United States, but also the middle-east.The sad, perverse irony
in all of this is that the United States claims to be bringing constitutional
democracy to Iraq and the middle-east, all the while it's
being taken from us here at home.

The epic horror and cold
brutality of this disaster, brought immediate public outcry, as well as a
united grief and outflow of compassion that did briefly unify the
people momentarily, however, in just a short amount of time this infamous
event has now become a contentious boiling point for many in the international community,
while at the same time forming an indisputable divide among Americans.
... (read
more)

Believe It Or Not, MAD
Magazine Was Right All AlongIt Has Been 'Spy Versus Spy' In This Country (And The
World) For Many Generations NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 123009

An Open Call For Help To The Real Good
Guys
In The U.S. Intelligence Community

The United States has been involved in sponsoring "false flag"
terrorism for years now, and that fact has already been proven by just about every
major war we ever fought since the late 1800s. One undeniable event was the
escalation of U.S. involvement in the Viet Nam War, allegedly provoked by the
"Gulf of Tonkin Incident," now openly admitted as never happening by former
DoD head Robert McNamara.

Many suspect "false flag terrorism" on domestic soil as well,
ranging from the first World Trade Center bombing, the Oklahoma City bombing and
the 9/11 event. What is undeniable in the latter domestic attacks, is that a
high degree of intelligence and funding were required to pull these events off.
Who exactly sponsored and orchestrated them is the big question.

It is also an undeniable fact that
most Americans and the world do not trust the CIA, because of the terror that
they have perpetrated on behalf of weak politicians and immoral ideology of the
ruling elite. These rogue
factions will argue that sometimes we need to do unpopular acts to maintain our
superiority in the world. This concept in itself is an extreme oxymoron, for we
have no "superiority" if we have to stoop to illegal and treacherous activities
to sustain what is supposed to be the greatest superpower the world has ever
known.
Intelligent and reasonable Americans have every right to be suspicious of such a
clandestine operation that has perpetrated the overthrow of many legitimate
democracies, while assassinating or deposing democratically elected leaders, all
in the name of 'U.S. interests.' ... (Read
More)

While we were not watching, conspiracy theory has undergone
Orwellian redefinition.

A “conspiracy theory” no longer means an event explained by a
conspiracy. Instead, it now means any explanation, or even a fact, that is out
of step with the government’s explanation and that of its media pimps.

For example, online news broadcasts of RT have been equated
with conspiracy theories by the New York Times simply because RT reports news
and opinions that the New York Times does not report and the US government does
not endorse.

In other words, as truth becomes uncomfortable for government
and its Ministry of Propaganda, truth is redefined as conspiracy theory, by
which is meant an absurd and laughable explanation that we should ignore.

When piles
of carefully researched books, released government documents, and testimony of
eye witnesses made it clear that Oswald was not President John F. Kennedy’s
assassin, the voluminous research, government documents, and verified testimony
was dismissed as “conspiracy theory.”

In other words, the truth of the event was unacceptable to
the authorities and to the Ministry of Propaganda that represents the interests
of authorities.

The purest
example of how Americans are shielded from truth is the media’s (including many
Internet sites’) response to the large number of professionals who find the
official explanation of September 11, 2001, inconsistent with everything they,
as experts, know about physics, chemistry, structural engineering, architecture,
fires, structural damage, the piloting of airplanes, the security procedures of
the United States, NORAD’s capabilities, air traffic control, airport security,
and other matters. These experts, numbering in the thousands, have been shouted
down by know-nothings in the media who brand the experts as “conspiracy
theorists.”

This despite the fact that the official explanation endorsed
by the official media is the most extravagant conspiracy theory in human
history.

When it comes to high crimes against the people,
a mantra often used by the guilty in order to diminish the
allegations against them, or from the ignorant who refuse to
entertain the evil of an organized cabal, is the label of “conspiracy
theory.” It is a term that has been methodically marketed
to pre-condition the public into wrongly believing that
conspiracy theory is a bad thing. This intentionally defined
derogatory expression is coined from two simple words,
“conspiracy” and “theory.” Let’s take a quick moment
to look at each of these two words.

Conspiracy:

Con.spir.a.cyn., pl. -cies. 1. The act of conspiring. 2. an evil,
unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in
secret by two or more persons; plot. 3. a combination of persons
for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose. 4. Law. an
agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or
other wrongful act. 5. any concurrence in action; combination in
bringing about a given result. (see conspire)conspirative, conspiratorial, conspiratory,
conspiratorially

Theory:

The.o.ryn., pl.
–ries
1.a coherent group of general
propositions used as principles of explanation for a class of
phenomena. 2. a proposed explanation whose status is still
conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that
are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact. 3. Hypothesis
or Conjecture.
the·o·ret·i·cal,
the·o·ret·ic, the·o·ret·i·cal·ly

Each of the
above definitions is easily understandable and unarguably a
legitimate word in its own right. Of the two, conspiracy
seems to have been given the worst rap, yet, by its own
definition, it is as valid and credible as any word there is, an
expression quite easily supported by the very nature of good
versus evil. For conspiracy to be cavalierly disregarded as
pure folly is to disregard the legitimate premise of the
definition itself.

In all reality a conspiracy takes place somewhere
on this planet every single day. To disregard conspiracy
is blind ignorance and absolute naive foolishness. (Read
more)

One thing
can generally be said about conspiracy theories, there are two sides of unequal
education debating the investigation of choice, with the "uneducated side" resisting
relevant new information because it’s contrary to what they believe.

The question to
the outsider, which group is which?

Arguably, the
"uneducated side" is essentially those who are unwilling to look
at all of the information. These people have seldom ever
attempted the exhaustive years of
research to get the full grasp of the story, instead spending
only a
few weeks or months at best, to find shaky evidence or
questionable testimony to support and prop up their own preconception
of the issue. Those who have diligently researched the issue know both sides of the
coin, while the debunker with less research knows only one side.
... (Read
more...)

The Nature Of A Conspiracy TheoryWhen Does An Investigator of A Large Crime Become A
“Conspiracy Theorist?”NewsFocus,
by Tim Watts 121109

Osama bin
Laden immediately denied involvement in 9/11. The FBI readily
admits that it has no evidence at all linking bin Laden
to the event, even though the Bush-Cheney regime immediately
laid the blame on him within minutes of the event.

So what
separates the baseless accusations of the U.S. Government from
the well researched claims of 9/11 investigators? Why is it that
those with tangible evidence in the 9/11 truth movement are
labeled as the “conspiracy theorists,” rather than those
in the government who perpetuate a very far fetched baseless
claim that cannot be proven?

Please
consider the following...

Investigators
in the 9/11 truth movement have uncovered military grade
explosives residue, complete with nano-thermite evidence from
the WTC ground zero debris; very suggestive that an orchestrated
demolition was the cause of the buildings' destruction.

Researchers have also recovered the previously classified FDNY
9/11 dispatch tapes through FOIA requests. The reason these
tapes were classified is because the FDNY firefighters that are
heard on the tapes claim there was no fire whatsoever
from floor one, all the way up to the 78th floor!
Even then, only two small fires were present on the 78th
floor, both capable of being put out with one fire
hose.

At least
5, if not 9, of the “alleged” hijackers have been found to still be
alive to this very day, never having anything to do with 9/11.
How did authorities come up with their names when 1) they had no
direct evidence against them, and 2) they were never in the
country to begin with.

Investigators discovered that the U.S. Government purposefully
released a tape of a fake Osama, claiming it to be the real
thing, even though U.S. intel wasn’t sharp enough to notice that
the “alleged” Osama in the video wrote, gestured, ate,
and drank with the wrong hand, contrary to what the FBI
has documented on him.

There are
many problems with the official U.S. version of how 9/11
happened, yet no one accuses the government of pushing its own
conspiracy theory, even though that’s exactly what their
argument rests upon.

Why is it
that conspiracy theory is reserved only for those that accuse
the government of foul play?

Who is
pushing the real conspiracy theory when it comes to 9/11?

The U.S.
government accuses bin Laden and his men of…

Sneaking past U.S. Customs

Eluding the CIA, FBI and U.S. law enforcement while in the
U.S.

Outsmarting the security of Dulles, Logan and Newark
international airports

Coordinating a timed takeover of four major U.S. airliners

Performing miraculous flying maneuvers with little or no
piloting skills

Circumventing all major U.S. air defenses

Destroying three steel framed skyscrapers with low burning jet
fuel

Planning such an attack without the NSA,CIA, FBI or Echelon
from catching it

Discovering and exploiting multiple secret U.S. air defense
exercises for 9/11

Overpowering all four airliners with mere box-cutters, while
grossly outnumbered

Whether
some like it or not, the above list is as hard to accept as
perhaps many scenarios proposed by 9/11 researchers. The
undeniable fact is, the government version is as much a
conspiracy theory as any other explanation offered to date.
Those who have actually spent the last eight plus years studying
the 9/11 conspiracy find it harder to accept the official
version because they cannot reconcile the actual facts of the
event with the myriad incongruities of the official story.

A
conspiracy is when two or more individuals come together to
commit a criminal act in collusion. Most major crimes in the
U.S. and the world involve more than one person, so why the
denigration of a legitimate dictionary definition that simply
denotes the nature of a criminal cabal or alliance? Are those
that like to equate conspiracy theory with lunacy trying to say
that conspiracies do not exist in this world?

Watergate
was a conspiracy that originated from the office of President
Nixon.

Operation
Northwoods was a planned U.S. Government conspiracy, albeit one
that was curtailed by President Kennedy before it was executed.

The point
is, conspiracy is real, especially so within the halls of
government power. To claim that conspiracies can only come from
foreign enemies is contrary to reality. To believe that there
are no political groups with nefarious, grandiose agendas is
extremely naïve. (see the PNAC)

So enough
with the “conspiracy theory” belittlement. Those that have an
issue with 9/11 truthers, try refuting the facts for once,
rather than those who try to investigate and understand them.

Conspiracy theory is real. Two publications will enlighten you,
the dictionary and a history book.

Just look
it up.

911 Reasons Why 9/11 Was
(Probably) An Inside JobRT News, by Robert Bridge - 0909099/11 was the day steel-framed buildings fell like
sandcastles, the law of physics worked in reverse and the United
States Air Force went missing in action. So what is the real
story? ... A Four Part Series ... (Read
More)

Not so long ago,
many once believed our earth was flat and that if you sailed too
far on the oceans you would literally fall off the face of the
planet. The flat earth theory was eventually shown for what it
was, a wrong assumption propagated by the powers that be of the
time. In the same vein, just over 400 years ago, not really that
long ago, many intellectuals and scientists of the day actually
believed that the earth was the center of the universe. They
thought that the sun revolved around the earth. This bankrupt
intellect was sadly enough perpetuated well into the 17th
century...

9/11 Truth Is Real PatriotismOver Half of
America Is Calling For A New InvestigationNewsFocus.org, by Tim Watts -
110609

Where Are You On The
9/11 Argument?

Have you taken the
time to openly look at the evidence?
Over half, 51% of Americans want a new 9/11 investigation.
Over 2/3rds of New Yorkers want a new investigation.
The people want answers, but our government is not telling.

The American people
want the truth and we want it now. We have have suffered, not
because of Al Qaeda terrorists, but because of our
politicians and our government. That is an undeniable
fact. We have been let down by those that we elected to office
to represent our best interests.

We want our
Constitution and our Bill of Rights back, now. The
cockeyed excuse that terrorists "hate our freedoms" is
certainly no reason to just give our precious freedoms up.
Excuse me, but isn't that giving up without a fight? We did very
well before 9/11, and we can do just as well after to fight
terrorism, without giving up any rights or freedoms.
Isn't that what we fight for in the first place, maintaining our
rights and liberty?

So why did we let
the Bush administration tell us it was a good thing to give up
our cherished freedoms, because of their own incompetent,
embarrassing failures on 9/11?

Has anyone got a
good answer on why we pay for their mistakes? One
answer does immediately come to mind, because we allow them to
do so. That has to stop.

It's time for all
Americans to wake up and finally demand some accountability from
their elected representatives. They don't tell us what to do,
we tell them what we want. That's the way a true democracy
is supposed to work.

If you examine the
9/11 evidence and understand how many top officials had to screw
up or be complicit in the attacks on 9/11, you will immediately
get angry over why "we the people" have been the ones
demoted, and yet those who allowed it to happen were all
promoted. While we lost our rights and habeas corpus,
every single one of those who were negligent on 9/11 got a
handsome promotion and increase in pay, essentially to
guarantee their silence.

If you're one of
those who has questions, but hasn't looked beyond what the
mainstream media is telling you, please take the time to read
and understand why our world has been allowed to change.
Is it possible for such a complex plot to be orchestrated from a
cave in Afghanistan, easily defeating the world's greatest
military power?

Why should one
attack demand so much from the American people and nothing at
all from our government?

The government
version of 9/11 is the true conspiracy theory. Take the time to
look at all the facts and you will be surprised at what has been
hidden from you, not to mention the lies that have been told to
fool half of America.

The truth movement
is growing and the "powers that be" know it. Don't let
them get away with the biggest coup in the history of the world,
the takeover of the United States. Be a patriot. Ask questions
and demand answers from our servants, the elected
representatives who act as caretakers for our government.

What we've been brainwashed to know about al Qaeda and the war on
terror is not quite as much reality as it is a complete fabrication of the
facts, or at the very least, a spin on the real truth of the matter.

The origin of al Qaeda is well understood by true historians of
the Afghan War with Russia, but for the many who never paid attention to the
1980s Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, they have been subjected to a contemporary
fabrication of the real facts in order to foment an enemy for the alleged
"War on Terror." ... (Read
More)