Ortiz v. U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California

Filing
21

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TRAVIS MICHAEL ORTIZ,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
v.
No. 2:16-cv-0659 GEB CKD P
ORDER
DAVID BAUGHMAN,
15
Respondents.
16
17
Petitioner is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas
18
corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On September 5, 2017, petitioner filed a supplemental petition.
19
Pursuant to Local Rule 220, the court does not permit supplement pleadings. In any case, it does
20
not appear petitioner has exhausted state court remedies with respect to his new claims and the
21
exhaustion of state court remedies is a prerequisite to the granting of a petition for writ of habeas
22
corpus. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1).
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the supplemental petition for writ of habeas
24
corpus filed by petitioner on September 5, 2017 is stricken.
25
Dated: September 11, 2017
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
1/orti0659.sup(2)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.