I know that ISS, being in low Earth orbit, requires regular boosts. But I can't seem to find information on how often does this happen. Is it done during each resupply mission, only during some of them, or are there missions which sole purpose is to boost station's orbit (doesn't seem likely, but what do I know)? Are the boosts larger, or small and periodical? How much does the orbital altitude oscillate over time (EDIT: I don't mean between apsides; let's say how does the apogee oscillate)?

$\begingroup$Only the Space Shuttle (retired) and then Progress or ATV (Now retired) when docked to the aft of Zarya can reboost the station. The station has the ability to boost itself, and is refueled by Progress.$\endgroup$
– geoffcMay 11 '15 at 12:40

$\begingroup$They do it less frequently now that the station doesn't have to be low enough anymore to be in the Space Shuttle's reach.$\endgroup$
– Rikki-Tikki-TaviMay 11 '15 at 12:42

$\begingroup$@geoffc Ah, I didn't realize it has it's own booster, makes sense, of course. But still, I wonder how often do the boosts happen. I can imagine they would interfere with some experiments, so they can't be too frequent.$\endgroup$
– ViniterMay 11 '15 at 12:47

2

$\begingroup$How often depends on the Station's altitude and on the density of the upper atmosphere. The Sun is by far the biggest cause of changes in the density of the upper atmosphere. Density varies a lot with the solar cycle, but even during solar min, all it takes is a decent-sized solar flare to make the upper atmosphere swell like a balloon.$\endgroup$
– David HammenMay 11 '15 at 13:08

1 Answer
1

The easiest to see ISS orbital reboosts is by checking Height of the ISS (where with height they mean orbital altitude above mean sea-level) over at Heavens Above. For example, for the last year, this is the graph:

This plot shows the orbital height of the ISS over the last year.
Clearly visible are the re-boosts which suddenly increase the height,
and the gradual decay in between. The height is averaged over one
orbit, and the gradual decrease is caused by atmospheric drag. As can
be seen from the plot, the rate of descent is not constant and this
variation is caused by changes in the density of the tenuous outer
atmosphere due mainly to solar activity. (Source and credit: Heavens
Above)

As you can see, reboosts (sudden peaks in altitude on graphs) are done on average about once per month, but there can be many consecutive months during which no adjustment in orbital altitude to the station is done. Which is nowadays done either by visiting Progress resupply vehicles, or the station's thrusters on Zarya and Zvezda orbital modules by using propellants delivered to the station by resupply vehicles.

ISS mean orbital altitude is however now higher than it used to be during the Space Shuttle visits when it was still being assembled, for easier access of the Space Shuttles and to increase their total payload to orbit capacity. Since assembly complete in 2011, and retirement of the Space Shuttle fleet, its orbit has been raised from about 355 km to now roughly 415 km (average):

Previously, orbital reboosts were also done to adjust station's phase angle so its orbit was accessible to the Space Shuttle fleet during convenient local times more often, but now these phase angle reboosts seem to be rarer but still performed for some visiting vehicle orbit rendezvous.

For more info on each specific reboost, refer to the ISS On-Orbit Status Report. Last reboost (on date of writing this answer) was performed on May 6 by Progress M-26M, despite the loss of Progress M-27M vehicle:

ISS Daily Summary Report – 05/06/15

ISS Reboost: This morning, the ISS performed a reboost using 58P
thrusters to set up phasing requirements for 41S landing scheduled on
May 13. Burn duration was 12 minutes, 17 seconds with a Delta-V of
1.34 meters/second.

$\begingroup$Another graph, from wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… . This is before station-complete, but you can easily see the effect of the solar cycle. The segments between reboosts are much steeper between late 1999 to mid 2002 than other points in time. That coincides nicely with the peak of solar cycle 23.$\endgroup$
– David HammenMay 11 '15 at 13:11

2

$\begingroup$@DavidHammen Thanks! Yup, there's a lot to be said about it, I was actually hoping for more answers than comments. :) Here's someone's nice blog post on ISS reboosts that I found. Reading it just now, so far it seems good. One additional point we didn't touch yet is that the station also requires own thrusters for debris avoidance maneuvers and such maneuvers would also (like space weather and subsequent atmospheric tides caused ones), albeit rare, be unpredictable when they will have to be done.$\endgroup$
– TildalWaveMay 11 '15 at 13:14

$\begingroup$Here's another graph from November 1998 until January 2006. These would be published in the past ISS On-Orbit Status Reports, but archived PDF files are terribly long and inconvenient to search through, and I haven't found a single source with a list or a graph of all ISS reboosts ever made (tho it should be possible to compile one).$\endgroup$
– TildalWaveMay 11 '15 at 13:57

$\begingroup$Do you know roughly what thrust that would work out to needing on a continuous basis?$\endgroup$
– Doug McCleanMay 11 '15 at 18:11

$\begingroup$@DougMcClean I believe that was mentioned somewhere on the site before. I don't remember exact number, but in the order of 1 m/s per week (at its current altitude, before assembly complete it would be more) sounds about right. Search for "ISS decay rate" or something similar.$\endgroup$
– TildalWaveMay 11 '15 at 18:21

Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).