Over two weeks, and the picture surrounding both Nisman’s death and the case he spearheaded should have become a little clearer. But if anything, it’s murkier: although we now know more about the death itself – for instance, that Nisman was shot in the head – we know little about what will become of his allegations against Kirchner. If a recent report by The Guardian’s Jonathan Watts is any indication, Argentinian judges aren’t willing to pursue them, “raising the prospect of the case dying along with the prosecutor.”

And what of the Iran connection? It was mentioned mostly anecdotally, as an “obsession” of Nisman’s, the focal point of an anti-government conspiracy fed to him by rogue sources. As expected, monitoring sites such as CAMERA and Iran News Updates called attention to it, warning against downplaying the Iranian threat and declaring the dead prosecutor a “martyr.”

Not one major outlet revisited the portrait The Wall Street Journal painted of President Hassan Rouhani days after his election on a moderate ticket, describing him as “one of the key overseers of Iran’s global-assassination campaign in the 1990s” and finally, crowning him “the Sheikh of Terror.” Has the campaign claimed its latest victim? Who knows, but don’t hold your breath for an Argentinian probe.