The United Democratic Movement has called on President Thabo
Mbeki to suspend his deputy, Jacob Zuma, whereafter, it says, the National
Prosecuting Authority should charge and prosecute Zuma.

In a statement on Monday, after a meeting of his party's
national council in Pretoria at the weekend, UDM leader Bantu Holomisa said the
council had noted the on-going trial of Zuma's financial adviser and friend,
Durban businessman Schabir Shaik.

"The council calls upon President Mbeki, on the
overwhelming balance of probabilities, to ask Mr Zuma to vacate his
office."

This was because "the image of that office and of the
country is on the line".

The National Prosecuting Authority should then charge and
prosecute Zuma, "so that he has the opportunity to disprove the allegations
against him before a court of law".

Holomisa made a further call on all UDM members who were also
members of Cosatu-affiliated unions to question reported links between the
Congress of SA Trade Unions and the Shaik group of companies.

Addressing his national council on Saturday, the UDM leader
referred to an "ongoing spectre of corruption" hanging over South
Africa.

Referring to Zuma in his speech, Holomisa said: "For him to
continue to put his head in the sand and claim that the onus is on the state to
prove he was in the pocket of Mr Shaik, is incorrect; it lies with him to take
the public into his confidence and explain his actions.

"What the public and President Mbeki's Cabinet have to
understand is that we are not just dealing with an ordinary employee, but with
the image of the office of the deputy president, and the image of the country as
a whole.

"The balance of probabilities is already enough for Mbeki
to ask Zuma to recuse himself from office. Once he leaves office, the Scorpions
will be free to charge him."

It was farcical to expect the prosecution authorities to pursue
a serving deputy president.

"In the past, other politicians and government officials
have been forced to take leave while they were investigated.

"However, in this case we fear that a bad precedent is
being set, with ANC spin-doctors seemingly hell-bent on glorifying the deputy
president, and sometimes even using state resources to this end."

Hardly a minute of evidence went by in the Shaik trial without
Zuma being mentioned.

"Already, more disturbing details are emerging from the
forensic audit. It seems increasingly dishonest to describe these transactions
as loans, as Zuma has claimed to Parliament's ethics committee," Holomisa
said.