He set out to create a monolithic publisher but instead created a debt-riddled behemoth that suffocated under its own weight.

In the process, countless employees of Harcourt and Houghton Mifflin were given the sack, becoming "realized synergies" as the educational publishing materials firm tried to cut costs to save money and pay what was owed to its creditors.

One side effect of all that acquiring was the decision by other publishers in the same industry to match Mr. O'Callaghan.

Cengage thought it had to meet the challenge head on, rather than go off on some road less traveled, and today the firm is being crushed by a debt load it cannot sustain.

As in the dismantling of O'Callaghan's creation, so too is Cengage beholden to the hedge funds, like Apax Partners, that are buying up all that debt. Those hedge funds are increasing their influence, because they have only to call in the loans and force Cengage to obey their commands.

Like O'Callaghan's pile o' debt, Cengage bonds are near junk status because the outlet for their niche in publishing is not promising.

Like O'Callaghan's notion to cut costs by merging companies and eliminating overlapping employees, Apax could combine Cengage with McGraw Hill and realize round after round of "synergies" in an effort to cut costs and put the money into paring down debt instead of paying people to work.

One employee can do the work of three, if they want to keep their job. And you have only to ask those who remain at HMH how well that is working out for them.

The merger would be good for shareholders who would see their stocks rise in value. As for the employees of Cengage and McGraw-Hill, well, consider yourself a synergy to be realized, a bit of collateral damage.

Are there any young urban professionals left alive out there in these hardscrabble times?

Aston Martin is betting that there are, and they are counting on that socially competitive set to be just as keen to spend money on luxury as ever, just like those long gone days when money was abundant.

Sleak, black, it screams out "This is NOT a Perego it's much more dear than anything the Italians are touting."

It's the perfect accessory if you like your martinis shaken, not stirred. Odd, there's no attached cupholder on the handle to stow your martini as you promenade with baby comfortably ensconced in Aston Martin luxury, your own little Baby Bond.

If you have to ask how much this necessary accessory is, you can't afford it.

If, however, money is no object when spending sends a certain message, this pram could be yours for 2300 British pounds. A good investment for those who like to use their offspring to display financial success, or at least create the image. When people are noticing that you're pushing an outrageously expensive pram, they won't notice that you have no furniture in your house because you can't afford it.

Only 800 of these junior roadsters will be manufactured, so you know the pram will be exclusivity on wheels.

And you can be sure that one of those 800 will be gifted to Will and Kate, which will only drive up demand.

You want your bundle of joy to experience that which royalty experiences, don't you? Would you deny your little angel the comfort of the Alcantara lined seat pad and aluminum alloy wheels that are designed for the roughest of terrain?

Why, you could climb The Reek at Croagh Patrick with baby in tow and the child would never feel a single bump!

Queues are forming up at Harrod's, where the pram will be offered for sale beginning in April.

A Silver Cross air ride suspension for baby. An ergonomic pushing handle for you. How can you even wonder if it's worth that kind of money? Don't you love your child?

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

The bachelor farmer is the stuff of Irish lore, the lone man existing in the back of beyond with nothing for company but his cows and sheep and fields. It was for him that the laws against driving after taking drink were nearly voided for country locales where the local pub is the only social outlet.

They are a species in decline, with the isolation of Ireland's backwaters fading. Electricity, the Internet and mobile phones are available to all, and a man no longer needs to live in solitude to pursue his career as a farmer.

During Ireland's land boom, the bachelor farmers were courted by business men who wanted to buy the land and grow houses. For men with no children to leave the land to, it was a reasonable solution. With all the cash from the sale, a man could find himself a little place in a town with people to talk to and a pub to walk to.

Matthew Hayes died a bachelor farmer, perhaps not expecting to pass away at the young age of 82 or perhaps waiting for the right price for his Wexford holdings.

Who stood to inherit the property of the man who never had a family of his own?

Noel Hayes took possession of his legacy in 1998, but he came to learn that an unequal sharing of the wealth fostered bitterness and ill will among a group of conspirators.

The millionaire owner of South-East Vegetables turned to Willie O'Leary for assistance in forging a will that made him the sole legatee. Mr. O'Leary's brother, who was given a lump sum payment for his help, told the authorities all about the scheme to forge the will and steal the land.

At some point, the O'Leary brother might have noticed that Mr. Hayes was already rich and could easily afford to give him more, but extortion doesn't always work as one would like.In the end, Charlie O'Leary was sentenced for his role, although the courts recognized his assistance by suspending the eighteen-month sentence.

Mr. Hayes was convicted by a jury that believed Charlie's story. He plans to appeal his six-year sentence and Eu200,000 fine.

It should be noted that Noel Hayes is not, in fact, a bachelor. But he does appear to be quite greedy.

So don't even dare to suggest that important clergymen are in danger of being blackmailed by their secular, and homosexual, lovers.

That being the case, Cardinal Lombardi, then why has Cardinal Keith O'Brien so abruptly tendered his resignation?

And how is it that he stands accused of innapropriate sexual contact with at least four priests?

Clearly, Cardinal Lombardi cannot be accused of making a false statement. His colleague from Northern Europe, the leader of the Catholic Church in Scotland, is not being blackmailed by the laity but by the clergy, so there you have it.

The rumours, therefore, are wholly untrue.

In a bureaucracy as Macchiavellian as the Holy See, you would expect all sorts of skullduggery, with plenty of backstabbing as those seeking power waltz through the steps of a courtly but lethal dance.

The first steps were taken some time ago, when the Pope's butler stole documents and letters which reflected a thoroughly dysfunctional government, complete with banking irregularities, power struggles and petty bickering. The cardinals not in power started the process of toppling those with too much power, while those with power, like Cardinal Lombardi, do all they can to hang on.

Remember the scene in The Godfather, where a rash of murders was juxtaposed with the baptism of an innocent baby? That's what the Vatican would look like if the Cardinals' vendetta used guns instead of words. In the halls of the city-state, however, no blood flows across the floor, but one Cardinal's career has been snuffed out with equal ferocity.

Then he went and returned them for a cash refund, but he got the cash while his campaign funds covered the original bill. The Justice Department couldn't help but notice.

We can't discount Mr Junior's senior, who has accumulated a fair share of enemies over the years. You just know that there were plenty of other political operatives who were lined up and ready to take a swing, to bring down a competitor and move their own into a position of power.

Mr. Jackson is merely the next in a steady chain of corrupt politicians, but that chain stretches back over one hundred years. He fell victim to his own hubris, unaware that he was far from untouchable. Yet the same could be said of those who came before him, those who helped to construct the machine that is Chicago politics.

In this intriguing work of historical fiction, you will experience the infighting and all-out warfare that was waged to gain influence and power. It's the same thing that goes on today, with lessons from the past thoroughly forgotten and thus repeated.

It is a tale of those associated with the powerful who are made to pay the price of the endless struggle for supremacy.

"Many of the women were consigned to the laundries for petty criminal
convictions. Some were the victims of abusive family relationships, and
many had mental health problems."

True, in part. But the bigger crime was the incarceration of women who were deemed too attractive to men by their parish priest.There is a well known case in which a woman was tricked into leaving her family farm, where she lived with her brothers, only to find herself in a laundry. If not for the persistence of another family member, she would have died in the laundry. She never knew why she had been put away. She could never have imagined that the priest thought she would tempt her brothers into incest, and so she had to be locked up.

There were many girls in the laundries who were the offspring of women put there because they were pregnant and unmarried. They were the ones who were not adopted, who survived a wretched childhood in an industrial school and then were moved to a laundry, so thoroughly institutionalized that they could never survive in the outside world.

THE LEAVEN OF THE PHARISEES is a novel that presents such cases as fiction, but the book is based on the words of survivors of the laundries and the industrial schools.

You can accept the cleaned-up version presented by the New York Times, or you can dig a little deeper and discover that the collusion between the Church and the State, combined with the power of those who think they know best, is a dangerous force. And the victims are always the weakest among us.

He had a gambling problem, it's been said, and he started out taking a little, thinking he had a brilliant scheme to boost his salary. After winning a bet, he'd pocket the gain and then repay his employer, and no one would be any the wiser.

But like any gambler, he kept throwing money into the kitty, losing and losing but believing that the next wager would win it all back.

It took Bertram Books until 2011 to really notice, when year-end financial reports seemed a bit skewed. After all, the bean counters had determined how much should be coming in, based on their knowledge of expenses versus income, and the bottom line was not where it should have been.

Bertram was insured against such losses of theft by deception, but not every business carries that sort of policy. If not for the insurance, the missing funds could have sunk the firm, just as if they had priced their books far below cost.

Because in essence, the embezzlement was an added expense that was not calculated.

Mr. Goble is looking at some serious jail time, while Bertram Books will be looking at an uncomfortable uptick in the cost of their insurance coverage.

That, however, is an expense that can be figured into the cost of the product. Unfortunately, such additional expenses do nothing to boost the bottom line when book sales are in decline.

If only another J. K. Rowling would appear, to create blockbuster novels that fly off the shelves of the Bertram Books warehouse...

Monday, February 18, 2013

Valentine's Day is supposed to a day for love, but human beings are not perfect and it's also a day for some major arguments.

Elaine Cook and her beau had a little squabble. Maybe he didn't bring her roses like she'd expected. Maybe he thought it would be romantic if she cooked him dinner, which is grounds for a well-placed frying pan to the head.

Like so many other couples on so many other Valentine's Days, they got into a fight and the end result was Ms. Cook telling her boyfriend to get out. Go, leave. They were finished as a couple.

She was dating a man who didn't take no for an answer, apparently, because instead of leaving as requested, Mr. Isn't-It-Romantic decided they could just kiss and make up.

Didn't pick up on the clues that Ms. Cook had placed in her conversation, or the man with a plan just plain didn't understand the language of not love.

A kiss isn't always just a kiss.

On St. Valentine's Day of 2013, a kiss became a domestic assault.

Gentlemen, if you've just had an argument with the girl of your dreams and you're trying to smooth over those rough spots, a kiss might help.

But don't try to slip her the tongue.

Ms. Cook has been charged with domestic battery, rather than assault with a deadly weapon, i.e, her teeth. Her former lover now speaks with a slight impediment.

The make-up kiss became an occasion for Ms. Cook to bite off a piece of his tongue, which she promptly deposited on the kitchen counter while he bled profusely into the sink. He wisely placed the fragment in a bag of ice and paramedics brought it, and him, to the hospital.

Unfortunately, doctors were unable to reattach the piece, and the man will forever have a partial tongue, a lasting memory of a St. Valentine's Day gone wrong.

Ms. Cook is currently incarcerated while her paramour is home, recovering from surgery.

She'll be out soon enough, and her attorney will argue in court that she told the man to leave so it's largely his fault that his tongue is permantly deformed.

And the women on the jury will agree.

French kissing to make up after a fight, really? It's his own damn fault, and if anyone should be locked up, it's the one currently portrayed as the injured party. Especially if he suggested that she make him dinner for St. Valentine's Day.

Mr. Lownie believes that his authors are not getting the full financial benefits of digital publishing, so he has created Thistle to level the field. Not only will the new imprint handle e-book publishing, but it will also create print-on-demand editions of hard copy books.

He plans to use Amazon's platform, which is fairly easy to use and absolutely free.

Given that Amazon sells the most books, it seems like a good fit, as long as the author is not concerned with the hard feelings that this price-controlling powerhouse has generated among brick and mortar book shop owners, to say nothing of Barnes & Noble.

Will Thistle help or hurt Mr. Lownie's credibility with the traditional publishers?

He's holding the option of e-publishing with his own imprint when he heads into negotiations. The editors would know they have to come up with big money, or lose the digital rights. Or, they can simply not offer to publish something Andrew Lownie is selling.

In Mr. Lownie's view, what he will do with Thistle is offer an opening for authors whose books fill some small niche that is not profitable enough for the big houses. With costs at a minimum, he will not need to sell a large number of copies to turn a profit.

The old conflict of interest bogeyman raises its head once again, with the concern that an agent would not push as hard for a publishing contract when he could do better as the publisher himself.

What remains to be seen is, will this new form of competition in publishing lead to better contracts for the authors, or even fewer authors getting an opportunity because the cost of risk would become too great?

The party is only just getting started.

DON'T MISS THE ARC GIVEAWAY AT NEWCASTLEWEST BOOKS. ENTER HERE for a chance to win a free copy of Jack O'Malley's debut novel, THE KING OF THE IRISH.

And the kids were not eating it.
So it's back to the hot dogs and chicken nuggets for those who buy a hot lunch at school. It's likely that the number buying instead of bringing from home will increase, now that there's something the kids like to eat.

Healthy foods were introduced by a trained dietician, looking at all those important factoids like calories, protein density, fiber, and all the things that dieticians like to measure.

The number of children buying lunch at school began to decline. Those who continued to buy avoided the healthy entrees as if they were poison.

The school district, which must be run like a business, could not afford to keep putting the recommended food items out there, only to throw them away at a loss. To save money, they chose to abandon the program and return to the good old days.

How can a school convince the students to change their diets?

Remarkably, it must begin at home. The school lunchroom just doesn't have the same cachet, the same influence as the home environment.

And it's clear that the parents weren't adhering to the government's mandate to make kids eat healthy. Instead, they gave in to the little ones and sent them to school with a lunch from home, where who could say if the ingredients were suitable to the dieticians who know what's best?

What can be done?

It's time to send a dietician to every home, someone to prepare the family meal every evening. A dietician who will make everyone sit there until they've cleaned their plate, while reminding them of the starving children in China who can only dream of eating four ounces of grilled salmon. A dietician who would not let them have dessert if they didn't finish dinner.

The students of the Arlington Heights school district need June Cleaver and Harriet Nelson at home. Today's modern parent just isn't doing things the right way.

DON'T MISS THE ARC GIVEAWAY AT NEWCASTLEWEST BOOKS. ENTER HERE for a chance to win a free copy of Jack O'Malley's debut novel, THE KING OF THE IRISH.

He left the hospital in such a rush that he forget to tell authorities where he was going. If they wish to question him further as to his whereabouts for the past several months, during which time he says he lived on one sandwich per day and a bit of water, they'll have to track him down.

They didn't manage to find him from May, when he disappeared, until January when he resurfaced, so there isn't much confidence in that claim.

There isn't much confidence in Mr. McGeever's claim that he was kidnapped, either.

In his glory days, Mr. McGeever flaunted his wealth throughout Mullingar, boasting that he was making money hand over fist in all sorts of schemes.

But ask those who invested with him and you'll find another story altogether, that of the classic con man who took other people's money and failed to pay a return because he was using those funds to flaunt his wealth.

Some lost entire life savings, so it's no stretch of the imagination to picture one of them holding Mr. McGeever for a ransom equivalent to what was owed. There's no evidence, however, that any ransom was paid.

But would a man be so desperate as to hide himself away and essentially torture himself with starvation, and to what end? He's still facing potential lawsuits by those investors and the builders who were constructing his mansion that was never finished.

There would be no avoiding jail time, whether he was kidnapped or not. Juries don't have a great deal of sympathy for defendants who cheat people out of hard-earned savings, and a kidnapping wouldn't soften those feelings.

Who can say, but perhaps Mr. McGeever staged his disappearance with a mind to get out of Ireland, but then failed to pay his purported kidnappers. Promises of future rewards, the life blood of his method of operation, would not be believed by criminals who know all the angles. Without immediate payment, Mr. McGeever's treatment would not have been the best.

Having left no forwarding address, it is clear that Kevin McGeever wishes to really disappear, as if his first stab failed but he's trying a new angle.

After living a splashy lifestyle, however, his face is well known and he's not likely to find success running a Ponzi scheme elsewhere. It's hard to have confidence in a confidence man when he's already known as a thief.

The strange case of the property develope grows curioser and curioser.

Will he surface somewhere else, with a new way for the gullible to get rich quick? Or is he going to try his hand at some other, less visible, form of crime to earn his keep?

Monday, February 11, 2013

Literary agents are considered the gatekeepers of publishing, standing at the velvet rope and allowing entry only to those they deem worthy.

You approach, but no matter what you try, you are rejected.

What is missing is the approval of someone already inside the publishing club.

Christine Sneed is on the cusp of having her first novel published, but she has been slogging away in the trenches for a decade. She is no overnight wonder, no stellar talent suddenly discovered in the slush pile.

So how did Lisa Bankoff come to realize that a writer she otherwise would have turned down was all that?

It surely didn't hurt that Ms. Sneed was teaching creative writing at several Chicago private universities. That's the sort of credential that tells an agent you know how to structure a manuscript and there won't be the expense of an editor needed.

In today's modern publishing world, run by accountants and corporate executives with eyes firmly fixed on the bottom line, that's no small consideration.

But what really mattered was that someone on the inside of the publishing club spoke for Ms. Sneed.

Friday, February 08, 2013

When you purchase that colorful box of Italian entrees from the freezer at Tesco, you have no idea where the contents come from, do you?

Anyone who feasted on Findus beef (so-called) lasagne or spaghetti bolognese for the past, oh, say, year, would never have known that they were enjoying something so far removed from the Emerald Isle.

The horse meat as beef scandal has taken another step up the ladder of spew-inducing news with the abrupt withdrawal of Findus Italian cuisine from stores all across Ireland and the U.K.

Turns out that the amount of beef in the lasagne and spaghetti was in the range of 100%, which as even the most mathematically challenged can determine, is not at all within the range of reasonable error.

The worst of it isn't even the fact that horse was put in place of beef without warning the client.

It's the fact that horses are treated with drugs not fit for human consumption, under the assumption that the horses wouldn't be eaten by humans.

So did your lasagne or pasta bolognese contain phenylbutazone, or not?

Grand that we've been advised to examine our homes for the presence of Findus products, and to return those not eaten.

What about all that was consumed already?

You wouldn't be worrying about this if you subscribed to the locavore philosophy, which preaches that you buy from local suppliers. That way, you know where things come from and can be aware of the sorts of practices that the farmer follows.

You wouldn't be purchasing ground beef from a cattle farm that has a large contingent of horses. Why take a chance that the meats could be co-mingled?

Know your supplier. Eat local. Buy local.

And stay away from convenience foods, especially anything originating in a country like France where they eat horses, don't they.

Naturally, there is money to be made and so Chicago's aldermen are all in favor of introducing a new service to the weary traveler. On the surface, we're being told that Minute Suites are meant for an airline passenger who can rent a small room, complete with daybed, work station and TV, for some nominal fee. It's a place to rest, to catch up on lost sleep while hopping from one plane to the next.

It's perfect for a layover. Better for a lay, but we're not supposed to talk about that.

For those business people who need a place to conduct an illicit affair, what could be better? The spouse would never know, since you could honestly say you were at the airport. Your cell phone would be pinging the nearest tower. You'd have copies of your e-ticket. All the evidence you'd need to point to fidelity while cheating.

But if a Chicago alderman should ask what you used the Minute Suite for, just say you took a nap. And that other person in the room? They were using the workstation.

That means you would have an excuse for a third party, who just came in to watch television.

I sense a plot for a Vivid Video here. (No, I'm not putting in a hot link that's NSFW).

Wednesday, February 06, 2013

The Irish government has finally admitted, after years of denial, that the State colluded with the Catholic Church to incarcerate women for the crime of being too pretty, of being attractive to men, of being raped, of being sexually abused, of being the child of an unwed mother, or of being poor.

It was done with the best of intentions.

The government wanted to create a better society, one in which poverty could be wiped out be removing children from their parents and re-training them. They wanted to eliminate immorality by locking up the women who were deemed immoral, so that the ladies could see the error of their ways and repent.

It was done with the best of intentions.

So when someone from the government tells you what is best for society, that some nameless bureaucrats are the ultimate arbiters of how you should eat, of how you should be treated by a physician, of how you should live your life, remember the fate of the thousands of Irish women who marched along the road to hell that was paved by the Irish government.

It was done with the best of intentions, putting women away for not living as the government believed they ought to. For not toeing the line that Irish society had drawn, guided by the teachings of the Catholic Church.

It is a tale of the government trying to control a portion of the population, and it is a sad litany of all the unintended consequences that were ignored until the victims of the abuse could not be ignored any longer.

All done with the best of intentions. The unintended consequences, however, are devestating.

Keep in your prayers the women who survived the brutal regime, who will now re-live all the horror as their truth is exposed for all the world to see and hear.Justice for Magdalenes has been fighting for many long years to have the story told.

In what is a touch of justice for those women, those who were brave enough to come forward and tell their stories to an unbelieving public will be vindicated. Those who cowered in fear, who hid in the shadows out of shame, will know that their experiences can no longer be kept from view by the Catholic Church or the Irish government.

The next step, however, will require more struggle, and it is hoped that the report prepared by Senator Martin McAleese will grant the former Magdalenes the public support they need to obtain redress for their many years of slavery. The women who scrubbed the sheets from Mountjoy Jail or posh Dublin hotels never received a penny for the labor, and so, they now receive no old-age pensions.

Suffering from psychological problems related to post-traumatic stress, without the funds to pay for medical care, without money to provide the basics when they are too old to work, the forgotten Maggies have their best chance of turning some of that around.

The abusive system is spelled out in fictional form in THE LEAVEN OF THE PHARISEES. Read the novel. Read the report. You'll find that fiction did not stray from the truth, no matter how unbelievable it might seem.

We are less than two weeks away from the start of our free book giveaway at Goodreads. Author Jack O'Malley is here to provide a little more insight into the way that justice is served in Cook County, Illinois, home of the city of Chicago.

The novel touches on the fate of the Haymarket Anarchists, a trial that took place three years prior to the murder trial that forms the narrative. In the Haymarket case, as in the trial of the novel's protagonist Daniel Coughlin, it was common practice to select jurymen who were certain to vote for a conviction.

In time, with the Irish ascendant in Chicago politics, and political power-broker Alexander Sullivan exerting his influence, the laws were changed to curtail the practice.

Imagine the sense of doom that must have pervaded the heart of a man who knew he was innocent, but also knew that the judge hearing his case was not without bias, that the jury was stacked and empanelled to guarantee a conviction.

Imagine how you would feel if you walked into court and discovered that your judge was bat-shit crazy.

It has happened in the past, in the Cook County court system.

More amazing, it is still going on.

Cynthia Brim has been a judge since 2000, running on the Democratic ticket and returned to office by dutiful patronage workers who vote the straight ticket as if their jobs depended on it. Okay, their jobs do depend on it. That is the only logical explanation anyone can give for Ms. Brim being retained in the last election, even though she was declared insane.

Ms. Brim had a history of odd behavior at the bench, all of it related to a bipolar disorder. She was prone to delusions and hallucinations, and once was carried out when she turned catatonic.

So how much justice can you expect to be served by a judge who should have been removed?

Her most recent escapade had her assaulting a deputy, which led to her suspension, but not her removal from the bench. In spite of numerous instances of mental illness that impaired her ability as a judge over the years, she has never been brought up before the Judicial Review Board. The Democratic Party backed her retention this past November, despite a day in March that was filled with delusions that ended in her arrest.

She has recently been found not guilty by reason of insanity. She has not been shown the door, but continues to collect her six-figure salary while on a leave of absence.

Justice may be blind, thanks in part to laws that were enacted after Daniel Coughlin's trial for murder. Judges and prosecutors can't pick the jury pool, which is now a random selection.

Public outcry from the once critical Irish-American voting bloc helped to turn things around for Coughlin. Where is the public outcry over an insane judge being allowed to parcel out justice?

Working for the City of Chicago or the County of Cook, most likely, and therefore not willing to rock the boat that keeps a roof over their heads and food on the table.

Monday, February 04, 2013

Richard III, once king of England, would seem to be important enough of a man to have his burial place remembered. It's not as if he's some fictional character that Will Shakespeare concocted for some drama. He was a real man, of real flesh and blood. And a real curvature of the spine.

Poor Richard fell to the forces of Henry Tudor, and don't we all know that history is written by the winners.

Being a wise playwright, Shakespeare chose to portray Richard as the bad guy in the power struggle that was won by the Tudors, who just happened to still be ruling when all those plays were getting written and performed in London.

What supporters Richard might have had were not enough to keep his resting place alive in common memory. All that remained was speculation and rough estimates, all of it growing muddled as the city of London spread beyond its boundaries.
It's now official.

Through scientific tests, a skeleton that was uncovered during excavation was determined to be that of the former ruler of England. The curved spine was the first clue, and then there was the gap in the skull where the King's head was split during the battle. DNA analysis using a descendant of Richard's sister Anne of York provided further proof.

Not that Richard was buried where he fell at Bosworth Field. He was interred at a friary, a suitable religious burial ground.

But those Tudors just wouldn't leave things be. Henry Tudor's descendant, the eighth Henry, destroyed all the Catholic institutions he could when he started up his own religion, and without the monks or the church there, with the mania to eradicate Catholicism, the site slipped away until it was just another empty field filled with stones and bits of foundation.
No more hard feelings between the Tudors and Plantagents, as neither house is in existence.

Perhaps the present Queen of England, of noble Germanic stock, will organize a little memorial service and have those old bones laid to rest with other ancient British royalty.

Although she may not attend the Mass.

Richard III was, after all, a Catholic. And we wouldn't want to send the wrong message to the hard-pressed loyalists in Northern Ireland who would start up a new round of rioting if their Queen were to set foot in a Catholic church.