Archives

Follow us on Twitter

A University of Copenhagen researcher who co-authored papers with Milena Penkowa — once the subject of misconduct and embezzlement inquiries — has been found by the Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty (acronym UVVU in Danish) to have acted in a “scientifically dishonest” and “grossly negligent” manner.

The Committee finds that Defendant 1 did act in a scientifically dishonest manner when writing an article published in Diabetologia (see Note 1). The Committee finds that significant information about the test subjects was omitted from the original methodology section in the article, and that this omission corresponds to ‘undisclosed construction of data’ as per section 2, 1 of executive order no. 306 of 20 April 2009 and executive order of amendment no. 144 of 20 February 2012 on Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty. The Committee also finds that Defendant 1 did act in a grossly negligent manner as it was her responsibility as the lead author to ensure that the information in the methdology section was accurate.

After a massive media frenzy over the last several years, I am happy to finally have my name cleared, and look forward to putting the matter behind me. I am now considering seeking compensation for damages, as the case proceeding against me — lasting for nearly 2 1/2 years — has had a great impact on both my personal and professional life.

Thank you very much for taking the time to forwarding that very comprehensive article.
It would be of interest to anyone interested in the research misconduct problem.I have
inserted below the section which specifically answers my question. DCSD is Danish for ORI.

What can DCSD do?

After stating criticism DCSD choose from various penalties:

Inform the defendant’s employer
Recommend that the scientific work that is judged unfairly, be withdrawn
Orienting a possible regulator
Inform Subsidized if there is dishonesty in an application for a grant from public research
Make a police report if there is a criminal offense
Inform its views on the degree of dishonesty, if the defendant’s employer wishes
There appear to be more serious penalty options available than to ORI.

I was quite surprised to find a description of the problem of cheating in school children.
I thought we had a monopoly on that., If it’s more widespread, there a study waiting to be done.

Please note that the paper from the Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty only is a DRAFT. Klarlund Pedersen is supported by colleagues in her claim that you can not be convicted for duplication, if your data comes from very large dataset that are used in many different studies.

When I heard the above news, I shocked. It was incredible that Prof Bente K Pedersen and fraud ?!?! I followed all of document about this issue. Finally, I reached the conclusion that it is needs to more scrutiny about this problem because Prof. Bente K Pdersen is a prominent scientist who helps to world by her excellent researches and certainly she adheres to the rules and pledged to the laws of scientific writing and research work. She never does fraud !!! It may be accorded technical errors and may be inattentive ….
I am sure that Prof. Bente K Pdersen is not a fraud scientist and nevertheless, she is a prominent scientist who have respectable and venerable among all of scientists, students and others.

Can you elaborate on the powers available to the public Danish prosecutor?

“The University has claimed that there was a case of “one of the most significant cases of scientific fraud.” It involves a non-existent company in Spain and attempts to transfer funds to a private account instead of to the university, it has been underlined”

I would be worried and it reiterates the need to look into the financial dealings of anyone involved in science-fraud.

The Penkowa case is very complicated and there is a lot more to it than ‘just’ the clamied scientific fraud. If you really want to dig into the case, read the articles from Weekendavisen, the paper who revealed the case in the first place: http://www.weekendavisen.dk/side/penkowa-sagen (in danish)