The SurpriseCBM

If girls are checking you out in public with love in their eyes and mist ‘twixt their thighs, it could be simply the case that you’ve got a ten foot hard-on walking ahead of you.

This happens when you’re daydreaming about last night. If you have an active, imaginative mind capable of weaving exquisite detail into a memory, you’ll often access those neural pleasure vaults that store steamy scenes of lovemaking, ancient and recent, while engaged in blissfully pedestrian activities, such as walking outdoors to get from place A to place B. Dulled by pre-collapse hedonistic pampering, you zone out to the thump of your playlist and recall in vivid hues that would be the envy of a weinstein bros production the girl you lacquered 18 hours ago. Your mind’s hand caresses her mesmerizingly rolling skinscape, exploring every hideaway, parting slick chrysalises, kissing lip and trough and mound, a stray nipple catching on your chest and springing away to resume its erect posture….

…and then you’ve got a boney. A big one. You look down and smile, because you’re not a soyboy ashamed of your surprise swole pole. Instead of concealing your insolence behind a stack of Atlantics, you milk your gristly thistle for all it’s worth, thrusting your crotch as far forward as it can go before you tip over backwards. Maybe you put your hands on hips to draw inattentive doe eyes to where they should be focused. A fat feminist shambles by, and practically salivates before remembering to be offended. You guffaw in her maw.

Personal space? That’s pleb talk. You have summoned a mighty pipe from your manly dendrites, and a gift as that should not go unnoticed.

I like a little room, but a bonus of tight pants is, assuming you’re a shower and not a grower, it’ll really pop.

That’s really the only good part of being a shower in my experience. Got more than a few looks in my day, but at the cost of the comfort of being a grower. Plus the D has a tendency to dip in the toilet which is never a good experience.

As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up; so that whoever believes will in Him have eternal life.

“For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life. For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him. He who believes in Him is not judged; he who does not believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. This is the judgment, that the Light has come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather than the Light, for their deeds were evil. For everyone who does evil hates the Light, and does not come to the Light for fear that his deeds will be exposed. But he who practices the truth comes to the Light, so that his deeds may be manifested as having been wrought in God.”

All this louche talk about proud public hard-ons and “God Game” gives me a sense that CH is indirectly (unconsciously) defending the Hollywood jews for their degenerate, satanic priapism. He has been silent about one of the more revealing scandals in years regarding sexual power politics and “approach” game.

Is what Weinstein did right or wrong? Isn’t he just an apex alpha in his fiefdom exercising droit de seigneur? Or is he a beta male who found himself accidentally in position to cull top-level pussy? Surely this requires some crimson-art interpretation. It is the rare case that comes along that could explain many phenomena at once.

As it is, I’m left to my own poor hermeneutics, thinking that Weinstein, “God Game,” and walking around with a woody are all of the same piece, i.e., what little rat-faced shits do because they have the imagination and dignity of a rat. At the same time, in this poz world of ascendant feminism and soy-faggotry, it isn’t the worst idea to remind the culture what masculine nature truly is, even in blunt and tasteless ways.

The God Game post comes so close to righteous without sealing the deal. Why continue to go through the trouble to deceive your mark when it is just as easy, and a hundred times more exhilarating/powerful, to become the genuine article? Not that you’d have to go to mass that morning rather than the pool hall, but why associate yourself so intimately, about the highest things, with the low world of lies? Hypocrisy is the tribute vice gives to virtue, yes, but that’s just stubbornness in this case given how simple and advantageous it is to actually exercise that virtue. Or in a practical sense, how much more complete, more convincing the ruse would be!

My guess is that CH is grasping toward the right thing but is too invested in appearing bad, which is why he praises the sleazy life of rodents who steal chicks from highborn, noble aeries. Dangerously thrilling in its own way but beneath the dignity of Christian white men and the civilization they (we*) made.

Let’s just say I prefer the Way, the Truth, and the Light…it’s where pretty lies perish. We live in a world where men have Weinstein like imaginations and actions when it comes to sex and most Western women take birth control ultimately making their hormones, bodies, and brain chemistries live a lie. It’s a sad and lonely world going that route.

King, only going off the tape of him trying to get the Italian actress into his room, Weinstein is a sniveling beta male in a position of power. Nothing he did there was even remotely confident, masculine, or with any dignity.

2nd, I’ve been a Christian for over 35 years. One of the things I’ve always been taught, and I agree with it, is to be in the world and not of it. That means developing basic discernment. Does what I’m hearing or seeing line up with Scripture. If not, what part of it does, anything? Looking for what has value, and what doesn’t. Calling something ” the sleazy life of rodents” is um, er, problematic for me (couldn’t resist being a smartass. Well, I could, but I never want to). First reason; with discernment, couldn’t you learn a lot from rodents? Second reason, it seems to me like a provocative slur against someone not of our faith. Third reason, and this is purely personal, but I bet I’m not alone. If I could find ANY denomination (Protestant, Catholic or Orthodox), or even any independent church that believed that Feminism is Satanic (in other words, they know what’s going on here and why), and forcefully declared Scriptural patriarchy, I’d probably drift away from this blog in short order. And I’m in the heart of the Bible Belt. All I see for miles and miles are beta tradcucks; Pastors, Elders, Deacons, and members.

Last thing about the rodent, have you noticed that we’re living in a garbage can? Yeah, I know, we’re supposed to rise above it, and I agree, but it’s pretty hard not to watch the rodents when they’re the smartest and bravest ones around. So now I’m wondering maybe who the rodents really are.

If it seems like I just called you a rodent, be assured I didn’t. I think you’re fantastic, and damn glad to see you back.

we learned 2 days ago that here in quebec one of our ” stars” of television – a gay man – has been accused by at least 11 person of pulling his d!ck out and begging them to touch or look as he masturbates.

his show was immediately canceled, and he lost many other contracts, he was making ads for McDonald as well

if you are curious/want to google it, his name is Eric Salvail

PS; another one of our tv “stars” ( Joel Legendre ) was caught – by an undercover agent – doing something like that 2-3 years ago, at first they said he was finished, but a few months ago they gave him a tv show and he is back as if nothing had ever happened…

You outta know. No honor among thieves, useful idiots->useless eaters. It’s a good sign. The easy beta milk and honey has been consumed. They must turn on each other to feed. I thought blacks would turn on white enablers before women turned on white male enablers. This play must have three acts, pip pip.

pulling his d!ck out and begging them to touch or look as he masturbates

This weird impulse, along with sending dick pics, and showing your hard on is trenchcoat mentality. It must be the transference of male sexuality onto female, assuming that women want the same kind of blunt display of genitalia that men (and men only in their most amped-up state of sexual need, mind you) are more likely to desire.

We used to clinically diagnose these people as disordered, until we emptied “disorder” of its meaning in order to fit sodomites under the rubric of normality, officially in the DSM-II (1973). That was the innocuous seeming loophole through which we normalized every flavor of paraphilia. And now we have literally goat-horned drag queens reading propaganda to children as parents/teachers look on, thinking, “This is fine. Must be open-minded!”

Before the poz smog descended, there was no question how to deal with freaks attempting to spread their psychoses in public for a cheap thrill. In fact, we were the most merciful people in history, allowing its motivation to be attributed to “mental illness” rather than demonic possession. But they are pushing us back to the extreme — it’s in their nature to poke and prod until they are punished, like any psychotic masochist — and the reaction will not be pretty.

Science has shown – as in, they ran an experiment – that if you show a man a picture of a hot woman, he’ll look at her eyes and her tits/ass; and if you show a woman a picture of a hot man she will look straight at his crotch. I believe this result has been repeated a couple of times. There’s a hidden camera youtube video where a jacked guy mounted (heh!) a camera on his belt buckle. They are subtle and quick, but they check out the peen.

Speaking of boner-killers, comedian David Cross’ wife is on Twitter throwing her husband under the bus for an alleged “racist” encounter years ago.

Rather than defend her husband or simply keep quiet, she reached out to the aggrieved Asian comedienne, announced that she believed the accuser, and admonished her Twitter followers “not to hold women accountable for the actions, decisions or words of their partners. Don’t. Do it.”

This is the extent of female loyalty in Hollywoodland Your wife goes on social media to virtue signal against you because being considered “racist” is the ultimate crime. Pedophilia is not yet beyond the pale.

Add in Ben Stiller and Adam Sandler.
I don’t think I’ve ever laughed at these clowns.
I use work with the Catskills crowd…they are all rich kids who don’t have to work so they do what rich kids do..enter the arts.
And then when they release a movie the tribe media hype it up and the goyim go and see it.

In fact, I usually prefer to watch fights between guys who are good but not great.

My basic interest is in self defense, so it is interesting to see – I feel I learn more by watching – the small flaws and problems in less regimented fighters and then asking myself “why did that happen” and “how could he avoid that?” and “how does that overlap with what happens in the street?”

I also cut out bits that show “problems” and “common issues” and save them in real time and slow-motion for my collection. Watching stuff at 1/8th speed you see lots of things you miss at normal speed.

Weird because I was noticing recently that Racism is probably the worst thing in America that anyone can be accused of right now from a social point of view. Well maybe Pedophilia is worse. It depends on the crowd passing he adjudication.

Murder? That’s somewhere between Identity Theft and Animal Cruelty. Yeah people don’t give a fuck if you live or not, as long as they can Virtue Signal and or maintain their Victim Statuses.

Bigj. The “P” is pretty much implied at this point. The use of “morality” in American society has reached a point of where guilt is the association of group needs over actual absolute rules. For example, when you are accused of being unethical (the definitions of what that is are in a state of continual change) it’s because someone has lost out n something such as power, property, or prestige; not because you have violated the Laws of your Creator.

___

Earl, not sure where you are coming from on this buddy, because Hate is even Biblical in some contexts. Calling Hate an evil is simplistic and childish. There’s are legitimate reasons to hate people.

I get a gaydar ping mixed with an alpha vib, but how does the emasculation stop the harem thing as propaganda? Propaganda can’t have too many wrongs. Strap-on harem? There’s always the next level, gents.

Don’t underestimate how cinema and television primarily tries to emasculate the black man (and by large part all men) through several means. I mean how many of them have to wear a dress to appease the imagination of tyrannically sick producers and directors.

It’s both. Globalism is fucked up that way. It’s all the forces of evil working together, yet destroying each other. So you can have the Buck Nigger with his bitches who is then being downgraded by feminists.

It’s always a beta nerdy faggy middle class nig aswell …the type that I’ve never met .
30 Rock had one too and the dreadful The Good Place tried to set up beta nerdy faggy middle class male with single cat lady hitting the wall.

“I propose an evolutionary theory of human female sexual fluidity and argue that women may have been evolutionarily designed to be sexually fluid in order to allow them to have sex with their cowives in polygynous marriage and thus reduce conflict and tension inherent in such marriage. In addition to providing an extensive definition and operationalization of the concept of sexual fluidity and specifying its ultimate function for women, the proposed theory can potentially solve several theoretical and empirical puzzles in evolutionary psychology and sex research. Analyses of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) confirm the theory’s predictions that: (i) women (but not men) who experience increased levels of sexual fluidity have a larger number of children (suggesting that female sexual fluidity, if heritable, may be evolutionarily selected); (ii) women (but not men) who experience marriage or parenthood early in adult life subsequently experience increased levels of sexual fluidity; and (iii) sexual fluidity is significantly positively correlated with known markers of unrestricted sexual orientation among women whereas it is significantly negatively correlated with such markers among men.”

There’s a couple girls on my Facebook who have their little “heartfelt speeches” about how, one time, some drunk frat guy grabbed their ass at a party or a guy cat called her and that’s supposed to constitute legitimate sexual abuse.

These same girls are always saying how “Omg well I realized I totes have generalized anxiety syndrome and I’m on medication so it’s under control but it’s a real hormonal imbalance in the brain but I manage things blah blah blah..”. And they usually have nothing real wrong with them.

They need to take meds for general anxiety? Women are so entitled they don’t want to feel unpleasant feelings anymore. They need everything from birth control to anti-depressants so that they don’t have bad feelz.

Its obvious most of you have never been in the Army. The Old Testament God is in drill instructor mode. The Old Testament is all about the Jews being taken away from the Moloch cult then returning to it, back and forth, abandoning God many times over and returning to the child sacrificing cults surrounding them. The sacrifice involved throwing a naked new born boy into an open flame and burning them alive. The book of Numbers is all about a census to see how many children were alive and that the excess boys belonged to God not Baal. The census was to ensure they couldn’t be hidden from God in an effort to circumvent his will. Circumcision allows God and anyone else to tell at a glance whether the child is subject to the prohibition. I don’t think it is needed anymore but that is the unspoken original purpose for the ritual. My son will not be circumcised. I was. We had no pressure in the States to circumcise our kids at all. It had to be requested.

damn. i’m probably in the minority here but i think bitching about circumcision being bad is plain retarded. American’s have been circumcizing their kids for a long time lol and it hasn’t caused any problems. Also, calling an institution “barbaric” is lib speak lol. Why does it matter if its barbaric?

>>>Traditional m@rriage is barbaric too lol, but who gives a shit?
>>>Telling your son to not be a h0mo is barbaric too lol, but do i care?
>>>Telling your daughter to not suck a bunch of dicks is barbaric, but does that matter?

Ritual mutilation is a non-white custom, and it is, frankly, disgusting. Ritual mutilation of the genitals is even more degraded and repulsive. It shows an undue fixation on the genitals in any case, which is characteristic of the Jews. It serves no purpose other than a primitive blood sacrifice characteristic of low-IQ peoples. Kind of like the (very liberal) body piercings, pierced tongues, tranny mutilations, and other modern stuff that has emerged as our culture has gone down the tubes.

Additionally, it’s a Jewish badge, and it is derived from ancient Egyptian paganism. It’s the custom of an alien people inflicted on Europeans for no reason.

What’s next, stretching the lip over lip disc like Africans? After all, that’s not very “liberal,” either, right? How about throwing virgins into volcanoes? Cutting off a joint of a finger every time a relative dies, like the New Guineans, until you’re left with just stumps in old age? Why limit yourself to sawing up your d1ck, after all?

“Ritual mutilation is a non-white custom, and it is, frankly, disgusting. Ritual mutilation of the genitals is even more degraded and repulsive.” – Ironsides

look bro I like the stuff you write but this is appeal to emotion lib talk. Not an argument. If circumcision doesn’t appeal to you, then don’t do it to your kids. It’s that simple.

what you are doing in your comment is you’re connecting (a) circumcision with (b) the jews and then (c) primitive low-Q people, and then (d) lip stretching. These is very devious sophistry lol because there really is no connection between these things. You are, in essence, building a strawman. Actually think this sh!t through, and it being “non-white” is not an argument. Who gives a sh!t if it’s “non-white”? Christianity is “non-white”, so does that mean we must all submit ourselves to pagan larping faggotry? Equating “non-white” with “wrong” is retarded. People drive non-white cars and eat non-white food all the time lol. I don’t hear people here crying about toyota lol

Greg’s made an argument that circumcision has two benefits: (a) hygiene and (b) aesthetics, with the only real consequences of (a) the very very very small chance of maiming your dick and (b) doing something the jews did. These really are not problems lol (hence why american’s have been doing it for a very very long time) but if they bother you so much then the solution is simple: don’t circumcise your kids. It’s a non-issue.

Of all the real things to bitch about, circumcision is just not one of them.

“it’s a Jewish badge, and it is derived from ancient Egyptian paganism.”

exactly. another inside joke foisted on the unsuspecting goyim. like “women’s reproductive rights”. “don’t worry, goyim! we’ll make sure your aborted babies are handled with dignity. no need for registration or death certificates or anything like that. that would infringe of a woman’s right to privacy. you can trust us tho. we’ll make sure they go right into the trash where they belong.”

C’mon, PA, that sort of argument has nothing to do with what I mentioned. The initial statement was that the ritual initial “served no other purpose”, when there were obvious hygiene benefits at the time… much like many of the OT laws concerning everything from food to menstruation.

If you want you make an argument, those considerations are no longer necessary, you’ll get no argument from me.

And as you yourself said, many times over, we’re heading for a crash where maybe all of them convenient indoor showers might stop working, let alone the time and leisure to take ’em like we do these days.

Bottom-line, if youse yeggs don’t want to get your sons circumsized, more power to ya.

But the practice ain’t hurt me and mine none… as well as several generations before us.

If the best argument anyone can come up with is alleged more pleasurable sex, well… that’s just another chapter in the muh dik comic book.

Not the point… as you yourself admit, it’s something to be “gotten over”… as I’m sure you and yo’ butt-buddies have, eggnog.

and i know the avg iq is dropping but it doesn’t take a fucking aerospace engineer to pull back someskin and wash

Well DUH… but most youse yeggs can’t even keep your oral hygiene straight these days, so again, the fact that it’s only a little extra effort is besides the point… my point is/was/remains, hygiene is easier, which can’t be disputed.

week old babies arent exactly good at articulating the trauma they’re experiencing

As if the birth itself isn’t an even greater level of trauma for an infant! You’re going to have to do better than that, because that sort of argument reeks of femspeak.. Of course, if your ragged self has some kids of your own, from which you could speak from experience, you’d know that it’s relatively minor and gotten over quickly by the infants. You think the medical profession is in that much thrall to kikery that they’d perform the practice as commonplace if the downside versus the upside were as steep as you muh-dikkers make it out to be?

guess it makes sense

ol greg always out to shit on ppl’s good time

I could give a fat rat’s ass about your “good time”… I’m just talking about what I think is right for me and mine… you’re the one whining about muh dik, as if your sex isn’t good enough.

ask the ladies’ is a pretty funny argument coming from somebody who goes on to say

>”If the best argument anyone can come up with is alleged more pleasurable sex, well… that’s just another chapter in the muh dik comic book.”

fsmh

Learn to fucking read, eggnog… the “ask the ladies” was about hygiene and aethetics, which you yourself already admitted that the uncircumsized member was something to be “gotten over”.

And the ALLEGED “more pleasurable” strictly from the man’s perspective has little to do with the feelz from the distaff side during the act… unless of course you want to make the ol’ “if I like it more, she’ll be happier” argument, which most experienced men can tell you right off the bat, none of us have a sugar-coated dick.

No excuse for defending a barbaric alien custom. I understand that an entire subset of Western civilization had adopted it. It was a mistake. It happens, worse have been made. Just cut your losses (double pun) and get out of the way when the next generations condemns it out of existence.

Just cut your losses (double pun) and get out of the way when the next generations condemns it out of existence.

Well, brother man, I guess this is just one topic on which we’re not going to see (ahem) eye-to-eye. 😉

If these ways are wrong, they will perish soon enough… and unless (((they))) launch a full-scale media campaign to convince mothers that it’s an unsound practice, good luck getting future generations to condemn it.

There is no need to weigh in with Boomer Wisdom on that one.

Cheap shot. You’re well-aware it’s not mere “Boomer Wisdom”… the West has been practicing it, by your own words, for a long time. If it truly were a mistake, as you claim, I think our (ahem) forefathers were smart enough to have sussed it out long ago.

my wanger was badly infected from my circumicision. doctor must have used a rusty bait knife, or something. everything turned out okay, but one could say I’m “partial” about the procedure. pun intended.

… and if I we’re going to play intelligent-designer’s advocate while comparing the trauma of childbirth with the trauma of pecker-skinning, I’d argue that the Creator intended for us to be skeptical about the illusory safety of the womb. hence why he made our passage into this world through a killer cunt a very “memorable” right of passage.

now, looking at pecker-skinning… in who’s interest is it for young men to start off life with a negative experience permanently associated with their penises?

I’m not taking a hard stand either way, but isn’t that something worth thinking about?

MedicaI pr0fession pushed circumcision so that a certain circumcised guest-popuIation can camoufIage itself among h0st-foliage, if you will. Unlike the previous time around.

JeeeeeeeZUS! If you can’t see that the medical evidence is overwhelming, I can’t help you. I’m telling you like a brother, PA, this blind spot isn’t doing any of you otherwise sound-thinking yeggs any credit.

In a world the way God intended, no… given that Satan holds sway over this system of things, and the realities of disease (not God’s intention, just another way for Satan to plague us as we blame God for not being “perfect”), well…

There are too many instances of alleged “design flaws” in the human body to even give this argument a passing mention… wisdom teeth, near- and far-sightedness, hell, even the way our hair and finger nails grow to the point of needing maintenance, not to mention the genetic diseases possible, where does it end?

If the human body flawed because we sweat and need to wash and wipe our asses?

Your view represents ancient semitic practices and their recent adopti0n i the Anglosphere.

My view represents all of the rest of humanity.

Heh, heh… not actually “recent”… and if you want to throw your lot in with the “rest of humanity”, rather than the Anglosphere, as if that tips the scales in this debate, I’d say you’re making my points for me.

Most goys in the states we’re intact until after WWII. Circs were likely done in the ancient times because desert types didn’t have the water laying around to clean the sand out of the snake 24/7.

But it comes at a cost and always has. Most people who have it done as adults regret it and feel duped by their aspie docs who are too locked up in reading research papers to figure out that if you’re taking off a third of the skin on your dick, it’s gonna make it harder to keep it up and the mechanism isn’t gonna work the same.

Stop letting the ego get in the way of good sense. You don’t need shitlib grief counseling about it; just admit it is a negative and shouldn’t be done, but that you adapted to it fine.

Weaseling, my ass… I’m stating my case clearly, and with a lot more logic than the other yeggs… just because I don’t happen to tickle your biases doesn’t mean you get to define words your own way.

Nor does it mean you get to make up your facts

Most goys in the states we’re intact until after WWII.

By the 1920’s, the number was 50%, and by 1935, 55%.

Nor take things that aren’t fact and state them as such, to wit:

Most people who have it done as adults regret it and feel duped by their aspie docs who are too locked up in reading research papers to figure out that if you’re taking off a third of the skin on your dick, it’s gonna make it harder to keep it up and the mechanism isn’t gonna work the same.

Circs were likely done in the ancient times because desert types didn’t have the water laying around to clean the sand out of the snake 24/7.

So you’re making my original point for me, and verifying that whoever said it served “no other purpose” than barbaric ritual was wrong? Thanks for having at least that much credibility.

Stop letting the ego get in the way of good sense. You don’t need shitlib grief counseling about it; just admit it is a negative and shouldn’t be done, but that you adapted to it fine.

HAH! Physician, heal thyself… I’ve given solid medical reasons along with the preference of choice debate.

All you’ve done is jump in with gots nuthin’.

That said, I think I’ve more than spoken my piece and nothing more is going to sway opinion, one way or another.

GE is supposedly a first generation German immigrant, only a few years older than me. Germans don’t circumcise and never have.

For the record, partial German, Sherlock… and is it THAT hard to imagine that young m-a-r-r-i-e-d folk coming to a new strange country are going to listen to the doctors, who at the time were extremely adamant about the advantages of circumcision?

Yeah I’ll give you that on the misquote. I was confusing the North African campaign of WWII with the African Theatre of WWI. Nonetheless, the sandy places and the hordes that inhabit them are the sources of this custom.

“So you’re making my original point for me, and verifying that whoever said it served “no other purpose” than barbaric ritual was wrong? Thanks for having at least that much credibility.”

But my more salient point is this: It still made sex worse and makes your dick function worse because you’re missing about half the nerves on your dick. There’s no way to wrap your “purple helmet” around that one, assuming you know any anatomy at all.

But you’ll never come around on it because that would require you to admit you are wrong, which no one here has ever seen you do once. So by all means, keep schilling for the tribe.

“For the record, partial German, Sherlock… and is it THAT hard to imagine that young m-a-r-r-i-e-d folk coming to a new strange country are going to listen to the doctors, who at the time were extremely adamant about the advantages of circumcision?”

Aaaaannd the truth comes out.

Instead of blaming the corrupt Jewmerica medical complex for cashing out on unnecessary cock-cuttings, GE turns his regret on the Chateau readership for laying down a little bit of logic on the issue that he doesn’t want to entertain.

But my more salient point is this: It still made sex worse and makes your dick function worse because you’re missing about half the nerves on your dick. There’s no way to wrap your “purple helmet” around that one, assuming you know any anatomy at all.

I don’t believe I ever denied the “more sensitive” issue… merely chalked it up as a moot muh dik point to those who are circumcised, because I don’t think I’ve ever heard anyone complain about lack of feeling in the act.

And if you think the possibility of some extra feelz is more important, or even just as important, as the medical benefits… especially in THIS age of rampant STDs and such… well. like I say, you do with your sons what you wish.

But you’ll never come around on it because that would require you to admit you are wrong, which no one here has ever seen you do once. So by all means, keep schilling for the tribe.

Hah, I’ve admitted I’ve been wrong in the past several times… and the fact that you keep dismissing my arguments as mere “shilling for the tribe” shows who’s got the issue with admitting the other fellow has a point.

And do me a favor…if you’re going to debate in the future, stick to what I actually say, not what you THINK I’m saying because it rankles YOUR prejudices.

Instead of blaming the corrupt Jewmerica medical complex for cashing out on unnecessary cock-cuttings, GE turns his regret on the Chateau readership for laying down a little bit of logic on the issue that he doesn’t want to entertain.

WTF are you on about now? The truth was always out about my origins, and I’ve voiced no regret whatsoever.

But Danger’s aspersions about my heritage needed answering, and I gave a very sound reason why a German immigrant (who back in the old country may not have had her children circumcised) would have a change of heart at hearing an authoritative figure mention to her the medical benefits of such… ESPECIALLY coming out of a war where disease was rampant.

Hell, if you want to get personal, mater overcooked damn near every meat for fear of parasites and such, but I digress.

In short, don’t trumpet “Victory!” from the rooftops until you’ve actually achieved one.

This is just an exercise in futility at this point. Your cost/benefit ratio of this procedure is skewed to the point of absurdity on this issue and there is nothing I can do to change that evidently.

Surgery is the most extreme intervention, and as such preventative surgery is just nonsense from a medical perspective. Eighty percent of the men on the planet don’t have this done, and a vanishingly small percent of them ever need it done medically.

— If circumcision doesn’t appeal to you, then don’t do it to your kids. It’s that simple.

People say the same thing about ab0rti0n and other intimate matters. It doesn’t work that way. Libertarian solutions rarely do in matters of reproductive consensus.

A society requires consensus on certain things, even if it has to be a forced consensus. Circumcision is one of those things. If a critical mass of people regard the practice as repellent and the skinned dick as a mark of the slave, there can’t be a live-and-let-live attitude about it among people who consider themselves otherwise belonging to one culture.

yes, but ab0rti0n isn’t the same as circumcision. you can’t equate the two because they both are different in moral matters. We know that ab0rti0n kills the kid and causes big societal problems. Circumcision does not have the same set of consequences. A vast majority of people who have circumcized dicks do not think it’s a big deal. It’s regarded as normal and acceptable lol. Not a real issue.

People say the same thing about ab0rti0n and other intimate matters. It doesn’t work that way. Libertarian solutions rarely do in matters of reproductive consensus.

The principle is sound, but the analogy isn’t… a-b-o-r-t-i-o-n has far many more moral implications, and circumcision does not affect the ability to reproduce, nor is in in common daily view that it would appall the general populace under normal daily routines.

A society requires consensus on certain things, even if it has to be a forced consensus.

True.

Circumcision is one of those things.

Not so much.

If a critical mass of people regard the practice as repellent and the skinned dick as a mark of the slave, there can’t be a live-and-let-live attitude about it among people who consider themselves otherwise belonging to one culture.

The historical record does not support this strong a reaction. It’s not like barbequeing dog in one’s backyard or having four wives, some under the age of reasonable consent.

If memory serves, even at the fiercely tribal level of Indians, there were various intra-tribal “socieites” which included, yes, a Foreskin Society and a No-Foreskin Society (I don’t recall if the latter were actively circumcised as ritual or merely born without a foreskin).

“damn. i’m probably in the minority here but i think bitching about circumcision being bad is plain retarded. American’s have been circumcizing their kids for a long time lol and it hasn’t caused any problems. ”

Um. What? No problems? Why don’t you read up on an issue before you talk about it? Mutilating the penis causes a great loss in sensitivity for absolutely no purpose other than made-up ones. In some it causes severe pain as they get older. It even kills some boys, approximately 119 boys every year – 1.3% of male neonatal deaths – due to infections.

“hasn’t caused any problems”?

The ONLY reason male genital mutilation is still going on in the U.S., while female genital mutilation isn’t, is because the Jews in the media want it. Because Jews practice genital mutilation due to their obsession with genitals, they want the goyim to be mutilated so Jews won’t be ridiculed.

And it creates a bond between Jews and Americans, at least in the minds of the dumb goyim.

If it wasn’t for Jews being circumsized themselves, they’d be using it as an example of how foolish conservatives are (for thinking it would stop masturbation). The media would have made sure it was banned long ago. Instead they keep pushing it and hiding the problems. Such as desensitized men having to grind and grind during sex, causing pain for both involved.

Americans are lucky most people don’t know they are mutilated, or they’d be ridiculed even more. As if the obesity thing wasn’t enough.

“The ONLY reason male genital mutilation is still going on in the U.S., while female genital mutilation isn’t, is because the Jews in the media want it.”

^^^this, when considered together, make you look retarded lol. There is literally no evidence of this. J3w this and j3w that. Cool bud but not an argument for why it shouldn’t be done. People do it because of health, aesthetics and tradition. Accept it, don’t do it yourself, and move on.

Americans are lucky most people don’t know they are mutilated, or they’d be ridiculed even more. As if the obesity thing wasn’t enough.

Americans do not care because we are the greatest country in the world.

The idea that kikes were pushing circumcision on gentiles so that they, the kikes, could “blend in” is somewhat far-fetched.

First, there are a lot of other physical traits that are right out in the open that mark them as “different from us”.

Second, there isn’t exactly a majority of Jews looking to merely pass… most display their Jewishness proudly, by word and deed.

And of course, often the names alone.

I’m not sure circumcision would be adding any great level of additional acceptance… the oft-touted “Judeo-Christian” tradition, such as it is, pretty much covers that base far more than any exposure in locker rooms and saunas at the local men’s club(s).

Greg, the thing is that I don’t think you can actually conceptualize how large the downsides are compared to the upsides.

In your mind, the benefits actually outweigh the upsides. And what we’re all trying to get you to see is that you couldn’t be more wrong in that regard.

It’s not just about “muh dik” or wanting more sensation for hedonistic reasons.

1) Botched circumcision kills a non negligible about of infants and mutilates permanently many more. It actually kills more people than it saves.

2) Even if it goes “correctly”, it’s not just about reduced sensitivity. It makes the sexual mechanics change because you have to fuck in a different fashion to achieve stimulation. Hell, you even have to jack off weird. Your dick deteriorates over time and scars over.

3) Women get dried out more easily and the friction causes pain a lot of the time without lube. Almost no intact men need lube because there’s not really any “scraping” motion in the vagina.

As for the benefits, the reasons are mostly crap. Anyone who takes a shower more than once a week can keep an intact dick clean. As for STDs, sure the rate is probably lower, but only because there’s lower surface area. That’s like advocating removing one kidney because it reduces the chance of kidney failure. And obviously any arguments about women liking the appearance/”he should look like dad” etc. are just a complete load of shit.

Name any supposed benefit and I’ll poke holes in it like Swiss cheese. There’s just no way out of this one Greg.

Greg, the thing is that I don’t think you can actually conceptualize how large the downsides are compared to the upsides.

In your mind, the benefits actually outweigh the upsides. And what we’re all trying to get you to see is that you couldn’t be more wrong in that regard.

It’s not just about “muh dik” or wanting more sensation for hedonistic reasons.

1) Botched circumcision kills a non negligible about of infants and mutilates permanently many more. It actually kills more people than it saves.

2) Even if it goes “correctly”, it’s not just about reduced sensitivity. It makes the sexual mechanics change because you have to fuck in a different fashion to achieve stimulation. Hell, you even have to jack off weird. Your dick deteriorates over time and scars over.

3) Women get dried out more easily and the friction causes pain a lot of the time without lube. Almost no intact men need lube because there’s not really any “scraping” motion in the vagina.

As for the benefits, the reasons are mostly crap. Anyone who takes a shower more than once a week can keep an intact dick clean. As for STDs, sure the rate is probably lower, but only because there’s lower surface area. That’s like advocating removing one kidney because it reduces the chance of kidney failure. And obviously any arguments about women liking the appearance/”he should look like dad” etc. are just a complete load of shit.

Name any supposed benefit and I’ll poke holes in it like Swiss cheese. There’s just no way out of this one Greg.

You said circumcised for several generations going back, a sort of tradition in the family I suppose. I assume that means both dad and Opa were circumcised. I was the only circumcised kid anytime I got in the shower with Germans. My Opa and UrOpa were not circumcised and neither was my father. My mother only allowed it because of the medical advice. I see no value in it myself. She said it broke her heart to hear my cry when they did it.

an objective party would be calling u an arrogant imbecile motherfucker on the daily.

In your negrified opinion…

Look, asshole, I understand your butthurtedness in getting smacked down by me every time you open your inane piehole… but no matter how many times you want to make up your own meanings for words like “arrogant” and “Imbecile”, that doesn’t make it so.

There’s be no reason to ban me… all I do is try give some of the shill and n1gger noise ’round chere the drubbing it merits… with an occasional jest (flat or not) and a bit of Scripture and Dutch Uncle wisdom for the bros who at times need correcting, in the best Shining sense. 😉

it’s impossible to have a discussion with a cut man. greg you’re so traumatized you’re defending this barbarism with a straight face.
and who the fuck put women in charge of male aesthetics?! my friend’s wif3 has his son cut because, and i quote HIM, “she said he will look better this way”. i wanted to punch that cunt.

Like I said earlier, in matters of sexual morality, libertarian solutions are not possible. That’s not me asserting an opinion, it’s a fact. That is no less so with circumcision as with ab0rti0n. Within a single society, either the cut, or the uncut dick is stigmatized.

It’s expected that people who had been born and raised in Greater lsrael will talk out of their ass about “health benefits.” Spin hamster, spin.

lol PA you’re equating two different things – circumcision and ab0r0tion – and you are trying to find a parallel in order to refute circumcision as an option. This is an example of a false equivalency. They may both be sexual but they are different – they have different consequences and different effects, both on the individual and on society as a whole. You have to refute each on their own terms.

[CH: circumcision is male genital mutilation, full stop.]

this is true, but it is also true that it being “genital mutilation” is not an argument lol. People have been cut for thousands of years; hasn’t produced any issues.

Also, according to my grandfather who was 19 when WWII started and was part of Polish resistance for 6 years, germans would absolutely look at dicks to resolve uncertainty if a captured dude claimed to not be a joo. so yea, blending in isn’t so far fetched.

fact: doctors don’t know how much or how little to cut; often times adult man has painful erections because too much was cut.

hygiene argument is so fucking lame i’m not even going to discuss it in depth other than: i’m 37-yo, never has 1 problem due to improper washing. my son is 9-yo and also never had one issue with his intact penis.

you are normalizing what was done to you and you are using outdated and long disproven medical “facts”.

again, it’s virtually impossible to have a reasonable discussion with a cut man about the topic.

if it is so beneficial, why not do the ethical thing and wait until the boy is big enough to give consent? say 18-yo. no? why not?

how is this the “ethical” thing? what ethics are you using here lol? you’re g@y feelings? No one who gets cut remembers the agony of getting cut, so no one who gets cut gives a sh!t. You can’t remember it so it’s not a problem lol more reason to have it done when you’re young. I get a better looking dick and I don’t have to go through the pain of getting it! win-win

hygiene argument is so fucking lame i’m not even going to discuss it in depth

you are normalizing what was done to you and you are using outdated and long disproven medical “facts”.

lol its been normalized for thousands of years, and so long as there are some hygiene benefits and it makes our dicks look better (can’t be denied lol), people are going to continue doing it for thousands of more years. accept the truth

again, it’s virtually impossible to have a reasonable discussion with a cut man about the topic.

au contraire lol, it’s virtually impossible to have a reasonable discussion with a man who hasn’t been cut because such a man can never fully grasp the feeling of not giving a sh!t about something so unimportant and irrelevant to the future of what’s at stack in western civilization as circumcision.

looks better? that’s the best you got? looks better according to whom? city femcuntz you’re not fucking? mediocre.

as i said, it’s impossible to have a discussion with a cut man. but i am truly sorry it was done to you. you’re like a man born with one eye trying to convince us that depth perspective sucks. sad really.

This playboy transgendered…how does that even come about?
Their readership are probably red blooded makes so someone at a board meeting had to come up with this bright idea but the board would have consented.
Why? What’s the agenda?

Within 10-20 years, any straight man who refuses to date a “woman with a p3nis” because she has a p3nis will be considered like a KKK member in terms of bigotry. After all, “a woman is a woman” and you’re just a bigot if you don’t agree that she’s just as much of a woman as a “woman with a vagina” is, or if you refuse to date her because she has a p3nis (you homophobe!).

I haven’t visited RationalMale for some time. I suppose Rollo continues to decline to name the jew.

But why should he? It’s all female psychology run amok, you see. It’s all natural behavior. All of it. It isn’tthat female hypergamy has been deliberately put on steroids or that men have been deliberately hobbled and weakened.

Take testosterone, for example: Testosterone is natural, you see. And so if I juice it up until I am at 2400 nd/Dl, and then problems appear, we can talk, talk, talk about the problem forever, just as long as we never take into account the root cause – the insane amount of juicing I am doing.

It’s the with the current insanely culturally juiced-up behavior of women. No need to look behind it. Women are just naturally crazy, That’s hypergamy, you see.

But Rollo can’t afford to name the Jew or discuss the GloboHomos. He works for JewMobVegas and the JewMobLiquor industry.

i also don’t spend much time on Rational Male anymore. not only because he won’t call out the real culprit behind our current social disorder but because in a way all his talk about women being what they are and we have to just accept it and learn how to manage them more sounds more and more like an excuse.

my theory is that he has been or is being cucked by his w1fe and that’s why he insists on pushing his agenda that all women are the same and we have to accept them all as possible mate options. girls will be girls, right? hypergamy is everything. no, we all know some are better than others. i can treat two girls exactly the same way and get two different outcomes from them. some girls just aren’t as bitchy and demanding, they stay loyal and without as much work. others are going to be a pain in the ass no matter what you do. that just a fact.

sure, they all take managing and game but believing every girl is equal instead of being discerning about who you choose is the worst thing a man can do to himself.

good points, cracker. all this kvetching about women and game and blah blah blah is just getting hooked on outrage porn if a guy doesn’t sack up and use it to make better choices.

a certain amount of outrage when a guy first gets redpilled is healthy and normal, and regular small doses probably helps us keep our edge, but building a blue chip brand out of it? come on. we can do better.

Trannyboy has jumped the shark. It’s refreshing to have such a neat dividing line between culturally viable and inert (but miss me with the photographs, please).

This is how we know the culture war has turned in our direction, and it isn’t just Playboy. The media going off the deep end in hysterics, Challahwood throwing up their last epic flops, late-night “comics” haranguing their audience instead of telling jokes … They know they have lost the general culture and now are desperately going after a niche in an entertainment world filled only with niches. It’s like dropping your money down the sewer and clawing for the last couple of bills clinging wetly to the grate.

Exactly. They scared if not whipped. But these are the types of weaklings the Globalist pigs love to use the most. To destroy us normal people.

I have been noticing how the entire establishment media is making President Trump out to be a corrupt heartless monster, when in reality he is a direct challenge to their corrupted and inhumane system. They are the frauds and the liars. They are the dividers, Trump is the Uniter. They are the destroyers, Trump is the Restorer. Trump is as real and as genuine as it gets.

Thinking of ways they could improve their looks isn’t sexual harassment.

That being said; women do that on a far greater level and much more commonly than I’ve ever known men to do it.

Women share the most intimate of details and secrets of their men like it’s nothing, child hood trauma, how they like their sex etc……one thing I can tell you is this; if there is something you don’t want others to know.

Never tell your lady friends because her entire circle is going to know.

Don’t know what to tell guys with little dicks….

Pointing out women; almost never gets done, we can fall each other’s looks well enough or you know, have eyes of our own.

Amusingly enough; one of the articles is about how Drag Queens are a form of cultural appropriation.

Part of the problems with these articles; so extreme even if they “had” a point, people aren’t going to run with it.

The fact that he underestimates the brutality of female behavior shows he knows nothing about them. He is sorely mistaken if he thinks that women follow any of the rules he outlined when they talk about men behind their backs.

But like another commenter said, it does seem like he doesn’t really believe it when he says it.

If there are no set amount of genders and Reality is a Social Construct, then how can sexual harassment or even rape be possible? In fact isn’t that the point when they want it to be? A cisgender male can look at a woman too long and it’s considered rape, but it’s ok if a tranny pedo rapes a little girl in the Women’s Bathroom. Do an Internet search on both of these examples, and you will find that they both occur at regular frequencies.

See it for what it really is and you will understand that these people are crazy and worthless and need to be put down for the sake of Human Survival.

Had a funny thing happen to me this summer at Target. I was there with my wife one day picking up some stuff. It was a hot day and I was off work so I was wearing some of my older shorts that had gotten loose on me. I grabbed a belt and put it on. It was one of those adjustable cloth type belts and in a darker color than my shorts.

I put it on and off to Targay we went. My wife was grabbing some makeup so I was standing around kind of bored when I noticed a woman 20′ away from me with laser eyes on my crotch. Her mouth was open halfway and her eyes seemed mesmerized, forgetting where she was at for a few seconds and what people might see what she was looking at. Complete deer in headlights look. She then scanned up, our eyes met, and she very quickly turned away.

I looked down to find that the end of my belt had come out of one of the loops and was just dangling there. I decided to leave it like that to see if I got any more reactions from women. As I was walking down the aisles it swung back and forth which proved to be too much for the women. I counted four more women that looked for more than a couple of seconds before they caught themselves, all with the same look on their faces.

It really opened my eyes as to what women are looking at while on a routine shopping trip.

I’ve been telling you guys that wear suits to work. On casual Friday, wear a suede tool belt. Hammer. Pliers. Screwdriver pack. Wear it around at lunchtime. Wear it to meetings. Wear it at airport scanning machines.

La grande bellezza is one of the best films of this century still young, yet so unpromising
It is about humans aging and their ridiculous desire to fight inevitable decay of the age, it is about Rome and its beauty contrasting the ugliness of the age, it is about the most useless generation that ever lived, boomers that is, their vanity and hedonism
And much much more

I don’t know if Paolo Sorrentino is gay, but he has headed full speed down the all-too-heavily-traveled road of ‘arty’ pretension and pompous self-indulgence that most in the entertainment industry end up lumbering down. La grande bellezza isn’t even the worst: This Must Be the Place was absolutely horrendous.

jeez did I make you watch the belleza?
I completely disagree with your take but the movies that you like (and cite here) makes it likely that you would not like this one
But it is not just simply that you did not like it, you are outraged
If I did I will write a request to the Almighty to give you back 21/2 hours

ok good
I have started to feel seriously guilty
I did not mean it was personal but I do think that you should have watched the film before speaking about it
As for outrage, it looks like irony and sarcasm have escaped you
Sane person in this time and age would never use that inflated word seriously
What I meant is that you have exhibited more than just usual disliking of a film
In conclusion I think there are much more important issues to cross our swords about than this Greg

I did not mean it was personal but I do think that you should have watched the film before speaking about it.

After viewing the snippets you provided… the assumption being that these are highlights… there’s no way I would sit through something like that in its entirety. As I said before, sometimes just a sniff of a dish is enough to let one know it’s not to be devoured whole.

As for outrage, it looks like irony and sarcasm have escaped you
Sane person in this time and age would never use that inflated word seriously

You sounded neither ironic nor sarcastic, rather, as one whose artistic sensibilities were challenged, and it rankled you. In this day and age, shaming language to put the other person in a light of unbalance is all-too-common, especially by our foes, and alas, we alt-R types fall into that frame all-too-often. (“Obsessive”, “u mad bro”, “flecks of spittle”, “must have hit a nerve”, etc., etc., etc.)

What I meant is that you have exhibited more than just usual disliking of a film

Then you haven’t been paying attention, or have been fooled by the fact that I don’t often discuss films I don’t like… but as Exhibit A, you can go back and see what I said about American Beauty, if you want to see “more than usual disliking”.

In conclusion I think there are much more important issues to cross our swords about than this Greg

No argument there, but on that note, our sidebar on this particular Art Drecko was not even a fencing exhibition.

as I predicted, competitors in the Victimhood Olympics would not pass up a perfect media-storm opportunity like the Casting Couch-pocalypse to vie for the Gold:

“Looking at the list of women who have accused him of harassment and assault, it’s clear he was going after not only culture-certified “trophies” but also those he felt he could suppress or control. Their fuckability was the currency he wanted, regardless of their consent. It’s important to note whom Harvey Weinstein allegedly went after, and by extension, those he did not.

…The outcry about the allegations is coming from a wide pool: Most of us who have or will face sexual harassment and/or assault will not be famous, and we will not be attacked on yachts or in fancy hotels. But the narrative coming out of Hollywood right now is about the victims who have come forward with allegations specifically against Harvey Weinstein, and that list is largely made up of white women.”

Harvey’s (hurricane not Weinstein) victims told that they will not receive funds donated for relief efforts if they support boycotting Israel, according to a funding application form issued in the wake of the devastating storm
Jeez we live in the time of the ZOG power that should not even be possible

Now I am not sure if the same will apply to Weinstein’s victims once time to collect shekels come’

Broke up with my girlfriend 4 weeks ago.
We had a 1 year relationship.

I moved on and just meet another girl.

But my ex still want to have contact and so do I.

I know feel that my ex started to chase me even more now,.
She even told me that she sensed Im not that avaible as used to be.

But how do I keep this going? How do keep the plates spinning?
She asked about the other girl and I just aloof described her as hot, young and traditional..
She asks about our dates but I dont reveal any details.

This whole thing, keeping contact with your ex is new concept to me and its a little bit strange.

So how do I keep the plates spinning, including my ex, whitout crossing the line. Whitout making her too jeaolus?

And do you guys tell your other plates that you have contact with other women?
Because I cant lie.

find the third one
learn to lie
perhaps you are familiar with that ugly leftoid scumbag Sartre
When asked if he ever lied to women he said always
To Castor too asked the bewildered presstitute
Especially to Castor responded Sartre
Castor is his long life companion in spreading leftist lunacy Simone de Beauvoir
If you goolag her picture you will understand the provenance of such a lovely nickname

The fundamental problem here is the utter meaninglessness & purposelessness of it all.

These are spoiled little children who are sleep-walking through their post-adolescences in the bodies of ostensible adults [and in the case of the THOTs, those rapidly aging post-adolescent corpora are about to become barren forever].

So either grow up & Make Sh!t Real Again & put SWEDISH BUNZ -> SWEDISH OVENZZZEZES.

The only reason for an LTR is the making & b!rthing & nurturing & raising of pr0geny.

Conversely, no pr0geny from an LTR == pure unadulterated Nihilism == Biological & Spiritual failure of the lowest and most odius rank.

An Alpha moves in quickly, surveys the landscape, makes a firm decision as to “Yea” or “Nay” regarding the question of pr0geny by the THOT, and if the answer is “Nay”, then he moves out & on just as quickly as he had moved in.

If you know she is on birth control the you should tell her to get off or you are out. It’s not about alpha or beta. She might only be attracted to you because of those pills instead of her own volition. The way those pills affect everything about women from her hormones, brain chemistry, mate choices it’s a very real thing that makes them live a lie. You don’t want to find that out after marriage…you want to know that before.

It’s better for a man if she isn’t on contraception and she’s attracted to you…and better if she is on them that you are invisible to her.

The fundamental problem here is the utter meaninglessness & purposelessness of it all.

These are spoiled little children who are sleep-walking through their post-adolescences in the bodies of ostensible adults [and in the case of the THOTs, those rapidly aging post-adolescent corpora are about to become barren forever].
———————————————–

Young people dating is meaningless? Unless they have children right away with the first person they date or something?
Sour grapes.

Sleazy loud mouth spineless coward is also stupid beyond belief
After having posted the poll on his twatter it turns out that every second
zog subject does not believe in 6 gorrilion
An attempt to suck (((their))) dicks turned into ridicule
Kill yourself scumbag

Please vote & retweet. Do not let Holocaust deniers and anti-Semites control this poll.

And far more Russian civilians were murdered by the Nazis. Why do only the foreskinless count? I never get an answer for that, except the bog standard “antisemitisisisisisism!” or stupid shit like “well, at least the Russians could fight back”.

Remember when people though Scumomucci was a great pick for the WH staff?

That was 4 D chess. Scaramucci was brought in to fire Preibus or force him to leave voluntarily, which is what happened. Scramucci got a sweetheart deal through immunity from his divorce payout which saved him tens of millions in lost property. Then went home to screw her sister.

Women, I will let you in on a male secret. Men know that constantly self-proclaiming male 'feminists' are often predatory sleaze bags. They are intensely disliked by other men because of their manipulative qualities and not, in general, because they are viewed to be sex traitors.

Yeah but youre boxed in. Id bet every single person here has an immediate family member that would vote for open borders either directly or indirectly. But im noticing a lot more people are becoming jew aware than ‘woke’ these days. If this continues eventually some obvious things will stsrt to happen like famous people talking about jews on tv or politicans talking about it. A tipping point. Its all bubbling under the surface. They cant stop the internet.

Mel gibson was one of the first. He should be given a medal. He was blacklisted for 15 years. Instead we give medals to jewish psychopaths who bribe politicans and make white children watch mind control movies about how great black men are.

Ever notice the way all of weinsteins charity and political work is the opposite of what he thinks?

Thats a very jewish thing. I bet 90% of jew york times columnists are not only race aware but race supremacists.

It’s contrary to natural law to be lorded over by inferiors. Situations contrary to natural law cannot and will not continue indefinitely because they require too much energy to maintain. There will be a backlash and a correction.

I’d like to live to see it but that really doesn’t matter much either way. It’s coming and nothing can stop it.

Women, I will let you in on a male secret. Men know that constantly self-proclaiming male ‘feminists’ are often predatory sleaze bags. They are intensely disliked by other men because of their manipulative qualities and not, in general, because they are viewed to be sex traitors.

Women, I will let you in on a male secret. Men know that constantly self-proclaiming male 'feminists' are often predatory sleaze bags. They are intensely disliked by other men because of their manipulative qualities and not, in general, because they are viewed to be sex traitors.

Male fems are often disliked by women for the same reasons. The whole equality nonsense (which feels good in imagination but isn’t true in the real world) is meant for manipulative purposes to get women…it’s very much like game.

There was a good comment on this board earlier on the subject. I can’t remember it exactly, but paraphrased: yes, everybody hates male feminists. The fact that this is so shows that in reality people value traditional, biological sex roles.

Two Northern Italian states (The Germanic rich ones) voted today for more autonomy.
The three southern states in Brazil voted in favor of forming a breakaway country.
Might all be ceremonial but this is the future…regional autonomies.
That is say Richard Spencer’s best chance to get his white ethnostate so not sure why he is taking Madrid’s side in Spain over Catalonia.
I favor a break up of the (((EU))).

Madrid V Catalonia looks like it may be some kind of shell game. Catalonia binds itself tighter to the EU, like Scotland, so that the parasitic leaderships of the “independence” movements can get themselves surgically attached to that sweet ECB and Euro parliament milk.

Lesson from history number #1? Quality (social and racial identification) of leaders matters. In contrast, ideologies are just bullshit smokescreens.

Larger homogeneous nations that had assimilated their indigenous micro-nations are less controllable. Poland had done this with its once quite hostile Silesian minority during Communism. Kashubs and Highlanders had been too small to demand autonomy, but post-Communism their legitimate demands for a measure of respect of their roots had been accommodated.

Analogously, Spain’s challenge is to convince Catalans that they are a valued part of the united Spanish nation.

Meanwhile, the district court in Munich recently sentenced a German journalist, Michael Stürzenberger, to six months in jail for posting on his Facebook page a historical photo of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, shaking the hand of a senior Nazi official in Berlin in 1941. The prosecution accused Stürzenberger of “inciting hatred towards Islam” and “denigrating Islam” by publishing the photograph. The court found Stürzenberger guilty of “disseminating the propaganda of anti-constitutional organizations”. While the mutual admiration that once existed between al-Husseini and German Nazis is an undisputed historical fact, now evidently history is being rewritten by German courts. Stürzenberger has appealed the verdict.

Only total economic collapse will save the European white man in Europe from the Jew’s plan for his extermination.

And the same goes for the United States.

Thankfully it is coming and so I appeal to all white men to prep and prep and prep some more. Even if you have no true hope and prep only out of bloody-minded, recalcitrant, Boer-like cussedness, that will do just fine.

I have just made a very cheap prototype of this device and am enjoying it very much. It allows strikes at angles that are not permitted by a normal punching bag. In particular, it allows strikes that come down at the top, side ad front of the head and up under and across the jawline with open hands (see my video on using the “stretched palm” in particular), hammerfists, and in fact the full range of hand types.

Materials:
1. One of those rubber bouncy toys for little kids. The ones that you inflate and it has a handle and the kid bounces on it. I suppose it is about 12 inches in diameter.

2. 15 kilos (33 pounds) of rice

3. Black cloth/rubberized tape like you can get in any hardware store.

4. A nylon rice bag or fertilizer bag of dimensions maybe 3 feet by 2 feet I am guessing. Anyway, the standard large size that carries about 50 kg of rice

Method.
Fill the rubber ball with the rice. Wrap it in black tape. Flatten and wrap the handle down too. Put it into the big fertilizer bag and twist the bag around so you have a handle. Again wrap the sphere in black tape – flattening the “ears” of the fertilizer bag – and also around the twisted “handle” of the bag.

Now you have to work out how you want to hang it. I made a loop of the handle, wrapped it with tape, then hung it up on my chin up bar with nylon rope so that the top of the bag was about six feet above the floor. But I have found the nylon rope slips. Better to use a natural fabric rope. But I will see how this goes.

So far, it is great to hit. It does sting the hands but doesn’t damage them. So that is ideal for building good hands for barehand hitting, for palm, knuckle, backhand, and hammerfist. Wolfe’s Law and all that.

Do not go overboard at the start and bruise your hands. Hang the bag somewhere you pass by regularly and give it a few whacks it when you do. Regularity without injury is the key. You will find the blood rushing in and out of the hands seems to make them feel very strong, like you have done a day’s work with them.

Stinging hands, even at the tips of the fingers (ouch), is caused by blood suddenly rushing out of your cells and then back in. The cells will quickly acclimatize to this.

You will very soon have very few concerns about hurting your hands in a conflict.

Because I voted for Trump I am on some mailing list…today I got a donation request from Chosen One Ministeries to help the poor persecuted Jews.
All the wealth they have and they are still looking for goyim donations.

I read it. I like Spandrell, and check him out on occasion. Can’t say I agree with all of it, but overall he makes some really strong points. Here’s one:”These people, these millions upon millions of unhappy Christians need something that gives them the red-pill but lets them keep being good Christians.”

Spandrell is obviously a skeptic, but he’s fair about it. One thing I’d reply to him is about the money angle. Peterson isn’t, in fact a preacher, or evangelist, per se, but if he was, and he’s raking in the money, it’s not necessarily that he’s conning anyone, or that it’s a racket. I don’t think Spandrell thinks this about him, but the connotation is clear as a general point. I think Peterson is raking in the money for the same reason that Trump got elected. He’s in a position that gives him a megaphone, and he’s that someone who’s FINALLY connecting. FINALLY giving voice to what we’ve been thinking, how we view things, what our struggles are, etc.

I think what separates Peterson is his position, iow. What he speaks and writes about has been around for a few years, articulated first by others, but he’s one of the first with a real megaphone.

I said something like this earlier to King, if Peterson WAS the pastor of a church, I’d be a member. And I’d tithe big time.

That might have sounded like a dis of Peterson, didn’t intend it that way. He may not be at the very very forefront of these ideas, but he’s a brilliant speaker, and marketer, and apparently an influencer too.

Being a Christian should not make a person unhappy. In fact, I don’t believe it does.

What makes a person unhappy is to feel constantly under pressure to act and speak against one’s own rightful interests and pretend that one likes it.

That is the very definition of misery. Which is probably why the Jews love to torture dumbass Cuckstians (yes, the name fits for so many of them) with it.

It is a sin not to give your daughters up to demons from the Congo or not to give your sons up to participate in horrific Jew-enriching atrocities in foreign lands. It is a sin not to obey the State.

When will these cucks speak against pornography, or endless war, or worship of the state, or state power, or the worship of deceitful political theories? When will they flood the establishment parties and take thwem back for higher values? Is this beyond their organizational ability? Surely they have the numbers!

How can a Christian subscribe to Democracy, which is the manipulation by the very worst of society’s morally and intellectually weakest?

So by popular vote the State may put aside the entire canon of Christianity and require that all Christians I live by the rules of nihilists and Satanists?

“But but but there was a vote!” says the Cuckstian.

Properly led, every Christian in every country in the world with a popwerful centralized State should be in prison, forming a world of prisoners of conscience so numerous that no system could house them without becoming itself a huge archipelago of Chritian power!

But what do we have? Fathers fearful of their w1ves and d@ughters. Secret wankers. Self-liars. Cucks. And all led by hucksters and corrupted crypto Satanists.

Christ sacrificed himself on the cross so that others might be saved. But these frauds all seem very unwilling to take the obvious hint.

“every Christian in every country in the world with a popwerful centralized State should be in prison, forming a world of prisoners of conscience so numerous that no system could house them without becoming itself a huge archipelago of Chritian power!”

Not OT, but just a slight change of direction. Thinking about VD’s comment, and about Jordan Peterson’s influence, and how to gain or regain power from the FreakMafia. What entity is, far and away, the most successful, gravity defying right wing group, who’ve won again and again, weathering all attacks by the Cathedral? The NRA. This is good stuff:

To return to the topic at hand, a public display of priapist protuberant splendor is a form of display of HMV. A stolen glance by her that you capture with your gaze is indeed an opener of epic proportions. Contrast this with the verbal play:
You, laser-eyed devil: Hi.
Her, flustered: Um, uh, no.
You, regardless of the actual weather conditions: Does it feel really, really cold to you too today?
Her, confused, glancing again: What? (Thinking subconsciously about it, is it really cold? Is that thing in his pants his cold-shrinkage version?)
You, smiling insouciance personified: I’m not usually like this (innocent gestures). Usually I _______.” Fill in the blank with something innocuous like “I wear shorts” or “avoid cold breezes” or “glove up when it’s cold.” The goal is subtle verbal innuendo in contrast to the physical declaration of manhood.

The reason CH does not explicitly call out christianity as the epitome of pretty lies is it is an integral part of most white Europeans identity, and he doesn’t want to compromise that. But a lie it is. And pretty too. He knows this.

I can’t claim to have good definition of faith, except that I know it is found in the same semantic family as words such as hope, and confidence, and optimism. So as an idea. I cut “faith” some slack because it seems to hang out with some pretty good and positive friends.

On the logical front:
I certainly know that Faith cannot be the same as “wilfully believing in lies” because Faith is applied in the absence of sufficient facts to draw a conclusion that has a very high probability of being true.

However, if I knew for a fact that something was a “lie”, then I must have sufficient information to be confident of that as a fact.Whether or not I had “faith” in those facts is thus not an issue that would logically arise.

I think you need to rethink your epigram. How about

“Believing lies is better than risking faith.” I don’t know quite what it means, but it certainly sounds good.

Vd, yes there are many definitions of faith. I was thinking specifically of religious faith in supernatural things. Believing lies is often easier than accepting the truth. Faith is easier than reason. Faith is independent of probability. In fact it is the opposite of that. Probability is part of logic and reason. Religious faith is the deliberate suspension of those things.

as much as we like to believe that Truth is something immutable, the truth (heh) is that it’s a moving target. there is always a higher level of truth, and us mere humans only get access to a few of the lower levels. when people are squabbling over the “truth”, they’re actually just fighting over their particular miniscule slice of the truth, at that particular place and time.

it is a universal truth is that everybody wants fertility, abundance, and prosperity for THEMSELVES. but it is also a universal truth that life is competitive, time and resources are limited, and there isn’t enough for everyone to live at the same level of comfort.

and it is yet another truth that death is just a heartbeat away, and many people have the ability to inflict THAT truth in others in order to enforce their OWN truth of wanting more for themselves.

so you have competition. you have fear of unknowns. you have a need to work collectively. scientific consensus helps address many of these, but people still generally require some mental framework that allows them to function in an existence where, in reality, they are just a tiny speck in the middle of eternity, and where many of the most important truths are hidden from view, such as “what is the value of a human life?” science can’t answer that, but the Golden Rule can. is that a matter of faith, it is that “truth”?

how does a person deal with all these unknowns? do they succumb to fear and tell themselves pretty lies in order to make their fears bearable? do they have the fortitude, the intellect and the drive to go against everyone else and follow the pursuit of Truth wherever it leads? you might. i think most don’t.

Marge Swanson, a fat acceptance activist who helped pioneer the concept of thin privilege, is dead from a heart attack. She was 34 years old. Swanson championed the notion that weight and health have no inherent connection. She enjoyed dying her hair bright colors, wearing glasses and dating African American men.

“It’s not that I’m thin-phobic,” she once told an audience on a college campus. “It’s just that curvy women have been enslaved and victimized by capitalists for far too long and yeah, I’m upset.”

Not a single one of those women could imagine or design or build such a device even if their very life depended on it. Maybe five out of a hundred could even accurately explain how a scale works. Maybe.

They just “know” that these machines (more precisely, those who are capable of creating them — men) somehow oppress them. So they smash these proxy men. Pitiful.

Not a single one of those women could imagine or design or build such a device even if their very life depended on it. Maybe five out of a hundred could even accurately explain how a scale works. Maybe.

They just “know” that these machines (more precisely, those who are capable of creating them — men) somehow oppress them. So they smash these proxy men. Pitiful.

not that I would worry to much about a group calling itself Trigger Warning but if they are finally starting to prepare I’d say it’s time to start counting down and aren’t these the same people that don’t believe in the 2nd amendment or really the 1st for that matter

female in charge of something lolzzzzzzz
as I said many times before until these empty headed feelz creatures are
confined to their natural habitat, kitchen that is, no sane society can be built
The whole history proves it times and times again

🆘‼️😂💦 The female official in charge at the immigration office, at the department of "permanent residence permits" in Germany. pic.twitter.com/uL2KlWFQR0

female in charge of something lolzzzzzzz
as I said many times before until these empty headed feelz creatures are
confined to their natural habitat, kitchen that is, no sane society can be built
The whole history proves it time and time again

her facial features need some balancing. that red lipstick is empowering, but she needs some eyeliner to make it pop a little more. also, the eyebrows need darkening. and a little less red on the hair.

also, lose the pearl earrings and get a nice pair of hoops to tie it all together.

Major, good call on the scarf color. in poor lighting it makes her look a bit heavy. maybe something in silk would work, purple or scarlet.. simple, though. nothing too busy. just enough to complete the ‘sophisticated and powerful’ look.

The room was gray and damp looking. Perhaps it had once been a root cellar. The weak light of a low sun crept in through a narrow window. One of the two men at the desk slowly and carefully examined the contents of a battered-looking wallet.

“You’re Mr Siegel?”

“Seagull.”

“Seagull? Yes, I see it is spelt Seagull but I thought…”

“No, I do pronounce it Seagull.”

“Alright. I see you’re from California.” The questioner looked up. “Things aren’t going too well right now in Cali.”

“It’s bad all over.”

“But you have come here.”

Seagull realized he had made a misstep.

“Yes, you’re right. It’s very bad in California now. Very bad.”

“How did you get here?”

“I walked.”

“It’s a long way. And now you want to stay?”

Seagull nodded. The questioner took a deep breath as he put everything neatly back into the wallet. Then he slowly released the breath, as if for some reason he were reluctant to release the air and did so only out of a sense of duty.

“So…what did you do in Cali, Mr Seagull?”

“What did I do? You mean my work?”

“Yes.”

“I was in, uh, in plastics. I was a salesman.”

“Plastics salesman? Retail or wholesale?”

“Retail.”

“Alright. So, if you would, please tell us about a typical workday for you, as a plastics salesman in California.”

“Oh, there wasn’t much to it. I wouldn’t know what to tell you.”

“Anything at all. What grade of plastics you sold. Where you sourced them. Names of your major competitors. Pricing policies. Terms of credit. What kind of salesman you were. Tell us about people in the office. Did you like the job. Anything. We don’t care.”

Seagull’s head hung a little. He pressed his legs together on the straight-backed wooden chair and rubbed his thighs with his hands. Then he looked up with decision.

“Alright. I didn’t sell plastics.”

“Oh?”

“I worked at a university.”

“Uh huh. Janitor?”

“No. No. I was an assistant. An Assistant Professor.”

“Chemistry? Engineering? Medicine? Maths? Agronomy?”

“No. No I’m sorry, no. I was in…Sociology.”

The questioner looked firmly into Seagull’s worried face and nodded with something like brotherly understanding. Setting his lips, he half turned in his chair and yelled to the door.

“Michael!”

The door opened promptly and was filled by a large, thick-armed, red-bearded man. A leather sap dangled from one big hand.

“Take him away. Give him paper and pencil. Bring him back tomorrow at 9 am.” Michael moved toward Seagull.

“Hang on, Mick.” Michael stopped by Seagulls’ chair. “Mr Seagull, you will be returned here tomorrow at 9 am to continue this discussion and you will then have an opportunity to offer your defense.”

“Defense for what?”

“That’s up to you. If you feel you have nothing to answer, you may argue that. In the meantime, as an Assistant Professor you must have written or first-authored many papers. How many would you say? Hundreds?”

“Fifty? Just fifty? Were you at a community college? But it doesn’t matter. Let’s call it fifty. So tomorrow, for your defense, you might like to list those fifty titles for us and then we can discuss them. What was your area?”

“Learning difficulties.”

For the first time, the questioner turned and looked at his co-panelist, who allowed himself a wry smile. The questioner turned back to Seagull.

“And you had teaching duties as well? I assume you must have.”

“Yes.”

“Alright. That’s good. So tonight, apart from your list of papers, we’d also like you to prepare a bibiography for those papers. List all of the books and articles you used in your research, and along with that we’d also like a basic description of the courses you taught and the texts and readings that you assigned. I am sure you assigned the same texts and readings year after year, so it should be no trouble for you to list them.”

“Why do you want all this?”

“Because tomorrow we are going to discuss them. They will contain all of the ideas that you spread to young people and out into the field of education in your professional capacity.”

For the first time now, the other panelist spoke up.

“The readings will clear you, Seagull. Or prove your guilt.”

“My guilt?” He paused to consider that. His lips were dry and he licked them, but for a moment his eyes showed a little sparkle. He looked up at his questioners. “The books in my field. Do you know them?”

Speaking of external male protrusions, I need some fashion advice from the CH. I just noticed I have man-nips that I recently realize show through an undershirt, a dress shirt and even a polyester jacket-vest zipped close. This has become more pronounced since I have been lifting. Do chicks dig that generally or do they find it to be a feminine/soy-boy turnoff? If that latter then I will want to deaccentuate and maybe even seek some cover-up mechanism from this place called Fashion First Aid. Thanks for whatever thoughts you have…

[CH: depends how big your man nips are. chicks dig a little erect nip on a man with otherwise nicely muscled pecs, but it’s not a look to take with you to the office. wear an undershirt.]

The more I read about what the Communists did with the family, abortions, state control, destroying religion and tradition, giving women all the power over men….the more I realize that the errors of Russia continue. Add the invention of birth control into the mix and humanity continues to be reduced to objects.

Sites like this continue to promote the idea that humans are mere objects for whatever your fancy is. That’s why the relationship with God is important…it protects human diginity and crushes the lies the enemy of humanity (Satan) continues to spread.

What’s the definition of an ugly man…physically ugly, a pushover, a perv?

Really men should be better at discerning what’s in a woman’s heart, her personality…that way you’ll know the problem childs and at least try to prevent that firing. That discernment becomes more difficult the more you are focused on your own lusts and pleasures.

A fair point. Stuart and I were talking physically ugly, which while not nearly as subjective as we would be led to believe, is way more subjective to a woman.

In Judge Thomas’ case, the joke is that if he looked like Denzell Washington, Anita Hill would have loved his jokes. But we know different. If he had serious GAME, she’d have been more receptive. But taking the time to say that does ruin the funny.

Also mentioning that she was a shill for the DNC out to ruin a conservative nomination, while true, also ruins the funny.

Some women are also just spiteful and follow their emotions. I’m not sure how much game will work to change those emotions…but between being repulsed by perceived weak (ugly) men and thinking her feelings make her ’empowered’ (witchcraft is a ruse, ladies)…a man really has to know the snares Satan has set.

Ugly is behavioral more so than physical.
Fat, Doritos-stained sclub inexpertly trying to chat up the nubile beauties in college is ugly.
Same guy at Comicon chatting up the cute Cosplay girls who are amazed at his video Gaming YouTube channel fame is attractive.

Physical attractiveness is not key. If Clarence Thomas looked like Denzel but still acted like Urkel he would still flounder.

‘I’ve never thought about a connection between feminist “empowerment” and witchcraft, that’s veeery interesting.’

Oh yeah…I’ve read investigations by an author who went to these feminist meetings and witchcraft or the occult was often involved. They’d even went so far as to think they were goddesses. If you know the story about the serpent and Eve with the temptation that she could be like God…that’s basically all it boils down to.

Depending on how hardcore the feminist is…you could be dealing with someone who has a cavalcade of demons with her. And unless you have the armor of God…you are going to be woefully outnumbered taking that on. There’s no ‘game’ you can do when it comes to demonic forces.

I’m ’bout to be a sperg: You lied to me. I went back to the beginning of August, highest comment count was 657 (Dominance Increases Male Sexual Attraction). I wasted all that time trying to validate your claim. I could have been doing something totally different to waste my time.

This reminds me of the day a couple months ago when I had a raging boner all day at work. I have no idea why. But I could not get it to go down for any reason, so instead of trying to hide it I let it ride for all to see. I felt so powerful that day. Nobody questioned anything I said. To my surprise nobody dared to correct me for my blatant use of my opportunistic bulge.

At this rate, it’s gonna be tough to hit 500. We need to start another argument. The one about circumcision was good for about 200 comments (190 provided by Looch and Greg alone). Problem is, I wouldn’t have ever guessed that a subject like circumcision would touch a nerve like that, so how do I find another topic even close to that hot?

We already got a bunch of selective reading hyperbolic assholes ’round chere, don’t be one of ’em. I doubt I posted more than 40 comments on the circumcision subthread, and most of ’em were a smack down of the fools ad homo-neming me, eggnog foremost.

A man has a right to defend himself. Of course, when I do it, “the trolls win”, but when Trump does it, he’s the God Emperor Alpha, go figger.