I have always been a fan of ThinkPads, ever since my father brought home a beaten 560e featuring a 150MHz Pentium which was rejected from the corporate pool due to travel abuse. Even though half of its 1GB disk was bad sectors I ran it well into this century and with all the cheap tat that is flooding the market these days, I've …

COMMENTS

Low res

Even the "businessy" models have started this slide to the mass market, cheap-as-chips 16:9 low-res panels. Does nobody realise just how badly they murder productivity? Or do people just watch films on the train these days?

2GB of dedicated graphics memory and a 1366x768 screen? It's like a match made in hea.... no, wait a second...

Too Short; Too Fat

It would be a kindness to remind your readers that 768 vertical pixels are VASTLY inadequate for any serious use. Even browsing is a pain and 768 pixels are insufficient for any serious word processing and many spreadsheets. The only reason for that crazy screen shape comes in two letters: DV, followed by a repeated D.

My T400s is better, 1440x900, but still insufficiently tall and at the price of teeny, tiny type. Anyone who actually works on a portable needs 4x3 or even a square screen, with as much vertical real estate as possible.

So, please remind your readers that 768 pixels are not enough, unless the laptop is meant only for email and DVDs.

Re: Low Res & Too Short, Too Fat

Whilst I absolutely agree 100% about the verticle resolution thing there are things you can do to make it less painful. I've taken to sticking the Windows toolbar up along the right-hand edge of the screen so that, at the very least, I have the full verticle resolution available to me. A verticle toolbar can also display a lot more apps before they start disappearing. I also then set the toolbar to auto-hide but I know this drives most others mad :)

Vertical resolution is so important

My (work) ThinkPad T61 is 1440x900. It's the smallest number of vertical pixels I think is even slightly useful. I'd much rather have a 4x3 screen, especially since the advent of widescreen seems to have coincided with software using up more and more vertical space. If you use Google Docs within Firefox (pre v4 or on XP) or IE, a huge amount of your vertical space is taken up with toolbars, menus, bookmarks and the like. And the new Office ribbon isn't much better. Saving vertical space was the chief reason why I switched to Chrome for browsing.

Widescreen is completely inappropriate for most working purposes. I couldn't care less about watching movies on my laptop. I have a television for that.

Re: Keyboard layout

keyboard

It is quite annoying (I have a slightly smaller, and much cheaper, NV337UK). The really big annoyance is that the F1-F12 are secondary: ie the top row of keys are multimedia (vol, brightness, etc) and only become F* when you hold down the Fn key. So Alt-F4 becomes Alt-Fn-F4.

The screen res doesn't bother me; mind you, I graduated from an ageing heffalump with a 15", 1024x768 screen, so smaller, lighter, more pixels, and around 2 orders of magnitude more unplugged time is a definite win.

Suits more than suits...

I'd say with only 768 vertical pixels on that widescreen setup, it won't suit the suits that do anything more that powerpoint presentations. Widescreens that small are only fit for watching movies on a plane.

The world is vertical, webpages scroll vertically, emails scroll vertically, why would anyone choose to view the world through the IT equivalent of a Panzer's port hole?

@ AC 08:16

I love these things

We have a number of the earlier Edge machines in the office, with the same casing and keyboard layout, and they're great. They feel solid and well built, look understated and classy in matte black (unlike their predecessors, the N300/N500 range with their tacky silver lids), and as business machines are reliable, quick little machines. The keyboards are nice too, with my only criticism being the arrow key/paging arrangement being a bit fiddly. They also run Mint perfectly out of the box. ;-)

Still behind the time, these laptops

I still think that pc laptops are quite behind the times with regards to usability. The macbooks are a bit more advanced but also not quite there.

When will they sell the laptops with the touchpad asimetrically placed? if i'm writing with both hands what should i use to reach the touchpad in the middle, dirty thoughts come to mind but not that wouldn't work. Hands are made to be put on the side not in the middle normally, it just doesn't feel right.

And for God's sake, please stop putting the bloody FN key on the corner where CTRL belongs, how often do you need to touch the effing thing during a day? maybe 6 times if you're really busy with meetings and moving around a lot. The FN key makes it no go to me (macbooks have the same problem)

obviously

Well, with...

...right or left handed touchpads; why not? The touchpads are usually built into the plastic keyboard surround; it's not as though you'd have to move other stuff around to fit, or as if the actual part would be expensive. I've seen figures of about 1 in 10 being left handed, and I'm sure they buy laptops too. There's left-handed guitars, watches, scissors etc. Maybe shops wouldn't keep large stocks of southpaw laptops, but you could easily have them as a special order item.

Pretty Think-Pad? Sacrilege

Well I for one don't want shiny chrome edges! There, said it.

What is the point of looking pretty when it is closed? It's what it does that matters - and how long it does it for (as the actress said the the bishop!). By going down this route, Lenovo are legitimizing the style-over-function movement started by Apple and are in danger of losing the confidence of ThinkPad owners.

As for the fingerprint reader - not a gimmick at all, but the easiest (secure-ish) way to start up. I don't think I've used the start button more than half-a-dozen times in the past 2 years and takes away from either typing long passwords or dangerously making boot-up passwords too simple. I wish my 'phones had this as I now have nearly as much sensitive info on that!

cheap tat...

Er, just no.

Sorry but I have to disagree. I've extensively used several models of Thinkpad, from 486s to the T410s. My own laptop is a 14" T60p with a 1400x1050 res screen. I've also used numerous Mac Books; Pros & Airs, PowerPC & Intel. I couldn't agree less with your statement. Don't get me wrong, Mac Books are well made, and they have some nice features (the magnetic power plug is awesome), but better build quality than a Thinkpad? No. And don't even get me started on the keyboards they fit to Macs. Ugh!

One may argue that the aesthetics and the nipple mouse are 'each to their own', but you can't argue with the build quality of Thinkpads (except the 570E, that was a tad flimsy), including the ability to easily take them apart and upgrade them. But if you use Macs then you won't know what I'm talking about. There's nothing in a Thinkpad I've not replaced at some point or another.

But it's a pointless argument; Thinkpads and Mac Books are aimed at completely different markets, and I'm a Thinkpad person.

Well, except the fact that Lenovo have no back-bone to stand up to the panel makers and demand 4x3, or even 16x10, high res screens. Gone are the glory days of a Thinkpad with a 12" or 14" screen and a res of 1400x1050. Very sad indeed and I rue the day I have to replace my T60p. :-(

I hate my lenovo

I've got a T61 with 1440x900 Intel graphics and I hate it. There are nowhere near enough pixels, so I shudder to think how I would cope with fewer. The contrast on the screen is also pretty terrible.

On the plus side, it still has a decent thinkpad keyboard (not shrunk down like the more compact models) and it has the trackpoint, which I never use, unless my hands are wet (like when I've just washed them, in case anyone's getting the wrong idea.....)

I get people's point about the function key, but you get used to it. I get annoyed with laptops where the control key's there. I also hate even more when home, end, pgup and pgdn require a fn key to use, especially as they're needed virtually contstantly when typing anything.

I wish I still had my old Z61. It was chunky, but it had a good graphics card, and a 1680x1050 screen which was crystal clear. Changed jobs though :-(