So Alive

Since last week, we've been keeping an eye on the thread Tracking Java Versions using Google Analytics, in which Gili Tzabari (cowwoc) linked to a blog he wrote showing how Google Analytics could be used to detect whether website visitors had Java installed and, where possible, which version. "I would love to see Google integrate this as a standard feature of Google Analytics but in the meantime we can do it ourselves. If you own a popular website please share your statistics with everyone else. I'd love to find out what Java usage is like in the wild."

A number of people have checked in with their results, and in today's post, Gili tallies up the results he's seen:

So it seems fair to say that ~70% of web users have Java installed, but for those of us interested in Applets or Desktop Applications I guess we are only interested in the top 56% or even 4%...

Is that good enough? I guess it depends on whether you see the glass half-full of or half-empty. I am actually quite surprised that 56% of web users have Java 1.6 installed. That's actually much better than I expected!

Draw your own conclusions from the results, or better yet, grind some data of your own. Complete instructions are provided in the Gili's original blog, linked above and from the first message in the thread.

Also in today's Forums, kirillcool talks about text rasterizing in the followup Re: Text anti-aliasing settings/Changing LAF. "In my opinion, the whole thing about exposing API to set the text rasterization hints is unnecessary. Java2D should use the native rasterizer on *all* platforms for all text rasterization APIs. This is partially done in 6u10 on Windows when the awt.font.desktophints property is used as mentioned in the original links. Hopefully, JDK 7 will remove the bundled rasterizer(s), deprecate the existing rendering hints (in addition to the desktop property) and make them no-ops and start using native text rasterization exclusively based on the current settings of the user desktop environment."

drichan wants you to help make the case forJava Web Start as Rich Internet Application technology. "I work for a large company that has created a web start application that is now being used by thousands of users. The application uses web start for deployment but has all business logic on the server using web services. Our marketing group wanted to know how to define our application, and I told them they should use the term Rich Internet Application. Because that is, in my belief exactly what it is. There are some in the company that don't believe in Java on the Client technology and therefore are pitching hard that this technology not be considered RIA, even though they are willing to call flash, flex, air, and silverlight RIA. How does the Java Desktop community come down on this question. I think it is important because much of Java on the Desktop issues really come down to marketing not technology."

In today's Weblogs Eamonn McManus has some help for Getting rid of that pesky MalformedObjectNameException. "You can't construct a JMX ObjectName without handling MalformedObjectNameException, which is a checked exception. Here's why that is a pain, how to relieve that pain, and what we're doing to make it less painful in the next version. "

Arun Gupta shares photos and slides from another traveling presentation inGlassFish @ JavaMUG - Trip Report. "Presented on GlassFish at Java MUG last week. The event is hosted at Sun's North Dallas Office. It was impressive to know that local Sun team is hosting 4 User Groups (MySQL, Solaris, and OpenSolaris other than the JUG) in a month."

Registered users can submit event listings for the
href="http://www.java.net/events">java.net Events Page using our
href="http://today.java.net/cs/user/create/e">events submission form.
All submissions go through an editorial review before being posted to the
site.

Archives and Subscriptions: This blog is delivered weekdays as
the Java
Today RSS feed. Also, once this page is no longer featured as the
front page of java.net it will be
archived along with other past issues in the
href="http://today.java.net/today/archive/">java.net Archive.

Comments

by jwenting - 2008-11-19 11:09

those conclusions are meaningless. So only some 70% of people website have a JVM installed? I'd call that surprising. Surprisingly low... Low especially given that almost all prebuilt computers come with a JVM installed, usually a current one at the time the machine was built.

Unless the results are biassed towards a low penetration by the website attracting mainly Linux users (who as is generally known "hate Java" almost as much as they "hate Microsoft") or some other fluke, it indicates a lot of people either using very old computers or homebuilts with no Java installed.

And that's a disturbing trend that shows the ultimate failure of all Sun's efforts to get Java onto every desktop.