Price Vs Effectiveness

Price Vs Effectiveness

Mods I am not discussing prices in this thread as I know its not allowed

I have just ordered my next cutting cycle which is going to be 8 weeks of Test prop and Tren Ace. My previous cycles were Test E and Tbol which were much cheaper. I was wondering where the price to results ratio straightens out. For example the cycle I have just ordered which might be twice as much as my previous cycles (in cost) but the results might not be twice as good. I was just wondering what you guys thought of this? Im no expert but it seems to me that cutting gear is certainly alot more expensive than bulking gear.

Mods I am not discussing prices in this thread as I know its not allowed

I have just ordered my next cutting cycle which is going to be 8 weeks of Test prop and Tren Ace. My previous cycles were Test E and Tbol which were much cheaper. I was wondering where the price to results ratio straightens out. For example the cycle I have just ordered which might be twice as much as my previous cycles (in cost) but the results might not be twice as good. I was just wondering what you guys thought of this? Im no expert but it seems to me that cutting gear is certainly alot more expensive than bulking gear.

If your ONLY criteria for a cycle being 'worth it' is Â£Â£s Vs Lbs gained, then meds like enanthate, sust, dbol etc are always going to come out on top.

But as Mick says there are other factors to take into account - how quickly it kicks in, side effects, quality of gains, strength gains (rather than pure mass) etc etc

Its like asking if whiskey is 'better value' than wine - well if you just want to get hammered it is, but most people will choose a good red over a glass of scotch to accompany their steak (even if they'll still choose the scotch on a poker night with the lads)