Share this

Most came into this debate believing that Gov. Palin would be respectable but not particularly effective. They also assumed Sen. Biden would use his considerable experience to show that he understood the challenges of America - and the potential solutions - better than his opponent. But neither met those expectations.

Gov. Palin connected with voters in a very direct manner. She "cut to the chase" and spoke in a way that real people in the real world understand. Her common-sense view of how to solve the problems we face as a nation will resonate.

She was also prepared, which most pundits did not expect, particularly after the Couric interviews. To the surprise of many, her answers on foreign policy were passionate and insightful.

Sen. Biden, while quite knowledgeable, was steeped in Washington-speak. And Americans aren't particularly enamored by that these days.

To be sure, he knew his facts. But so do most politicians who have been around a while. For instance, not too many voters will understand what a "MRAP" or "madrassa" is.

While Obama likely had a slight advantage last week in the presidential debate, Palin clearly struck a chord with everyday Americans and will likely be considered the "winner" by those who watched.

Once the media finishes their "analysis," however, the perception of who "won" may be different in the minds of those who did not watch than those who did.

More POLITICO Arena

About the Arena

The Arena is a cross-party, cross-discipline forum for intelligent and lively conversation about political and policy issues. Contributors have been selected by POLITICO staff and editors. David Mark, Arena's moderator, is a Senior Editor at POLITICO. Each morning, POLITICO sends a question based on that day's news to all contributors.