Highlights—April 25, 2009

New York Times, courtesy of the Salt Lake Tribune: Layoffs
done piecemeal enable companies to skirt the law. By Steve Lohr. Excerpts: With
the economy weakening, chief executives want Wall Street to see them as tough cost-cutters
who are not afraid to lay off workers. But plenty of job cuts are not trumpeted in
news releases. Big companies also routinely carry out scattered layoffs that are
small enough to stay under the radar, contributing to an unemployment rate that keeps
climbing, but that is not always truly reflected in jobs reports.

IBM is one such company. It reported surprisingly strong quarterly profits earlier
this year, and in an e-mail message to employees, CEO Samuel Palmisano said that
although other companies were cutting back, his would not. "Most importantly,
we will invest in our people," he wrote.

But the next day, more than 1,400 employees in IBM's sales and distribution
division in the United States and Canada were told their jobs would be eliminated
in a month. More cuts followed, and overall, IBM has told about 4,600 North American
employees in recent weeks that their jobs are vanishing.

J. Randall MacDonald, IBM's senior vice president for human resources, said
it was routine for the company to lay off some employees while hiring elsewhere. "This
business is in a constant state of transformation," he said. "I think
of this as business as usual for us." ...

In interviews, IBM workers whose jobs are being eliminated were mainly chagrined
that the undisclosed cuts, and the timing, seemed to contradict the company's
public statements. Rick Clark, 50, an engineer in East Fishkill, N.Y., had worked
for IBM for 11 years. He said he was disappointed in IBM this time because the
job cuts were deep and spread across so many businesses and came at a time when
IBM has been proclaiming its success. "I do think IBM, like other companies,
has used this recession as an excuse to lay people off," he said.

Poughkeepsie Journal: Cuts
spur IBM earnings. By Craig Wolfe. Excerpts: The benefits of cost-cutting, so
painful to hundreds who have lost their jobs locally, have helped IBM Corp. as a
whole push up earnings for shareholders even as revenues decreased in a global recession. ...

Chief Financial Officer Mark Loughridge told analysts Monday that IBM had spent
$265 million out of a year's planned total of $300 million to $400 million for "workforce
rebalancing," which is mostly severance payments for terminated workers.
That reduces overhead. "This lower level of fixed costs improves our balance
point," and means most of the financial benefit of it lies ahead, he said.

Computerworld: H-1B
visa use cuts U.S. programmer, software engineer wages by up to 6%. Researchers
say new study 'dispels the myth that globalization generates no losers'. Excerpts:
The researchers said they found evidence that the wages are falling by accessing
tens of thousands of resumes provided by a "leading online job search site" they
wouldn't identify, to gain demographic and wage data of individual companies.
They took all that information and combined it with government and other public
data sources, including H-1B visa use and outsourcing, to get what they termed
a "micro-data" view of what is going on in public companies that hire
visa holders and offshore work. ...

"In this paper, we simply sought to dispel the myth that globalization
generates no losers," wrote Prasanna Tambe, an assistant professor of
information, operations and management sciences at the Stern School, and Lorin
Hitt, a professor of operations and information management at Wharton. The
authors said that it's important that policy-makers understand the wage impact
of the H-1B visa program.

eWeek: Cognizant
Technology to Back-Pay H-1B Workers. Excerpts: One of the leading technology
companies in the United States that uses H-1B workers has recently agreed to backpay
nearly $510,000 to 67 employees. Based on an investigation by the U.S. Department
of Labor, it appears that Cognizant Technology has been found in violation of several
laws. From a recent article in Computerworld:

Teaneck, N.J.-based Cognizant is one of the largest H-1B users, having
received approval for 467 visas during the federal government's current fiscal
year. That put Cognizant, which has more than 60,000 employees worldwide, in
seventh place on the list of H-1B recipients for fiscal 2008. The Labor Department,
in a statement released this week, said that the company had violated federal
law by failing to pay "proper wages" to H-1B tech workers. Cognizant
also "failed to offer all H-1B workers equal benefits or eligibility for
equal benefits, and failed to maintain required records," the agency said.
A Cognizant spokesman said that the company isn't commenting on the settlement

Computerworld: Five
reasons why the H-1B cap will be increased, revised. By Patrick Thibodeau. Excerpts:
President Barack Obama has signaled interest in taking up comprehensive immigration
reform. And any push for immigration reform is almost certain to include an increase
in the H-1B cap. One year ago, I outlined five reasons why the cap will be increased;
this is a revised assessment.

H-1B opponents have no friends in the White House...

H-1B opponents have no money...

H-1B opponents still have no clout...

Congress will increase the cap...

The H-1B opponents have lost the public relations war...

Yahoo! IBM Pension and Retirement Issues message board: "So
how much does retiree medical coverage cost?" by "steveazcyclist".
Full excerpt: I'll be 51 with 30 years at the beginning of 2010. I'm single and
my kids are grown, so only worrying about me for the moment. I realize that things
vary greatly by location and the coverage chosen, but I currently choose the $0
out of pocket option and am happy with the coverage. Can someone give me an idea
of a range of how much that equivalent coverage will cost me as a retiree? My FHA
account has about $33K in it, so obviously the 14 year gap to Medicare is a big
concern. Thx.

Yahoo! IBM Pension and Retirement Issues message board: "Re:
So how much does retiree medical coverage cost?" by Kathi Cooper. Full excerpt:
Your FHA health premium for one person will be about 675 per month, and I am being
very conservative. Therefore, your FHA bucks will last about 4.07 years, just for
you.

I decided to use my FHA bucks up as soon as possible after I retired. I've left
a little bit in there as an assurance that I'm still able to use their health
insurance later on, even if it costs me a thousand a month. I have since found
my dream job as an accountant at a little community bank. I'm up front with everyone
and tell them I'm working for health insurance. It's a very good match.

If the Democrats get their campaign promise granted, we should be able to get
health insurance from a common health insurance pool, made available for those
that don't have it otherwise (if your still out of work and the FHA is gone after
those 4 years). That would be a good thing for many of us as I'm certain some
of us will need it.

Yahoo! IBM Pension and Retirement Issues message board: "Re:
So how much does retiree medical coverage cost?" by "madinpoik". Full excerpt:
Here are the monthly costs for one person under the FHA plan for 2009. These plans
are available in the Hudson Valley area. From what I have heard from others, the
costs are similar or equivalent to those in other areas of the country.

Aetna Open Choice PPO:

$659.10

Health Net NY:

$847.67

IBM EPO - MVP:

$704.62

IBM Hi Ded PPO w/ HSA - MVP:

$593.54

High Ded PPO - MVP:

$514.21

Med Ded PPO - MVP:

$614.97

Low Ded PPO - MVP:

$773.97

Yahoo! IBM Pension and Retirement Issues message board: "Re:
So how much does retiree medical coverage cost?" by "madinpoik".
Full excerpt: Here are the 2009 monthly rates for employee + spouse. Because this
is the FHA plan and there is no IBM subsidy, the costs are almost exactly twice
what they are for one person.

Aetna Open Choice PPO:

$1319.20

Health Net NY:

$1695.70

IBM EPO - MVP:

$1409.23

IBM Hi Ded PPO w/ HSA - MVP:

$1187.09

High Ded PPO - MVP:

$1028.43

Med Ded PPO - MVP:

$1229.93

Low Ded PPO - MVP:

$1547.95

Yahoo! IBM Pension and Retirement Issues message board: "Re:
So how much does retiree medical coverage cost?" by "ranheimchas".
Full excerpt: I retired after 40 years of service. When I reached 30 years, I
was told many times my medical insurance was "Paid up" for when I retire
as part of my deferred compensation. Needless to say, my free medical for life
now costs me about $12,000 per year.

I, like many others, believed what IBM told us. For those promises, we worked
all kinds of long hours, gave up vacations, and missed many family gatherings.
Now, many retirees are at the point they can barely pay for their medical bills,
having little or nothing left to enjoy retirement.

For those still working, be careful how you plan your future. Don't hang your
hat on what IBM tells you. Those days are gone. Once you retire, you become just
an expense, instead of an asset. Needless to say, IBM is always looking for ways
to cut expenses.

Chicago Tribune: 8
tips on paying for health care in retirement. By Emily Brandon. Excerpt: It's
difficult to predict what your health care expenses will be in retirement. Jack Dickinson,
65, thought he was one of the lucky ones. His 34 years as a General Motors sales
and marketing manager came with two gold-plated benefits: a pension and lifetime
medical coverage. And Dickinson was lucky indeed--until GM scrapped retiree health
care coverage this year for about 100,000 white-collar retirees, him included. The
beleaguered auto giant did raise monthly pension payments by $300 to help retirees
buy their own coverage. But "it does not replace, by any means, the excellent
coverage that GM gave us," says Dickinson, a retiree in Hoover, Ala. "If
you go on the open market and try to replace everything, it is not available."

Wall Street Journal SmartMoney: The
Hidden Costs of Retiring Early. By Angie C. Marek. Excerpts: BACK WHEN MARK TURETSKY
was an entrepreneur, building a business empire that sold pork rinds, cotton candy
and beef sticks in bulk, he seldom worried about insurance. His only health hiccups
were high cholesterol and acid reflux—common problems for a guy his age. So he had
no qualms about coverage when he decided to take the plunge and retire early, at
age 55.

The qualms kicked in later, when Turetsky, still eight years away from qualifying
for Medicare, looked into buying new health coverage. His insurer told him that
now that he was buying on the so-called individual market instead of through
his company, the annual cost of covering himself, his wife Stephanie and son
Jacob would more than double, to $27,600, or the price of a Honda Accord. And
when Turetsky shopped for a better deal, things got Kafkaesque. The local Blue
Shield affiliate told him it didn’t cover anyone in Greenfield Park, N.Y., the
rural township where he lives, because the area is “riskier than average.” The
AARP’s “young retiree” health plans, he learned, aren’t even offered in his state.
Turetsky joked with Stephanie that he’d become a greeter at Wal-Mart if it would
keep his medical costs down. Ultimately, he bought the only policy he could find,
which doesn’t cover some routine doctor visits—and still costs him almost $13,000
a year. Suffice it to say, this wasn’t part of Turetsky’s script for retiring
young. “This whole insurance thing,” he says, “entirely blindsided us.”

Almost everyone fantasizes about swapping the cubicle and BlackBerry for a life
of permanent leisure while they’re young enough to enjoy it. Untold millions
put in long hours to make the fantasy a reality, and in these rough economic
times, others have taken buyouts or been laid off. Unfortunately, America’s patchwork
health care system is making those transitions much harder. Too young to qualify
for Medicare and rarely covered by their employers, early retirees can face premiums
they neither dreamed of nor planned for—often three or more times what they paid
while they were working. And that’s for the healthy ones; others, who suffer
from ordinary middle-age ailments—arthritis, elevated blood pressure, even back
trouble—wind up paying far more or are simply rejected. Caught in this ugly collision
of costs and restrictions, the only answer for some is to go without coverage.
The public-policy research group The Commonwealth Fund found that in 2007 about
35 percent of people between the ages of 50 and 64 were uninsured or underinsured—up
from 26 percent five years ago.

eWeek: Microsoft
Taps Former IBM Tools Exec for Security Job. By Darryl K. Taft. Excerpt: It's
no surprise that Microsoft has hired a former IBM tools guy to enrich its organization.
What is somewhat surprising is where the software giant has him working. Microsoft
has hired former IBM software executive Lee Nackman as the new corporate vice president
of Microsoft's Identity and Security Division (ISD). According to Nackman's bio on
Microsoft's executives Web page, which appeared on April 17 -- a year after Nackman
retired from IBM: "The ISD group Nackman oversees creates products designed
to protect systems and information from the latest threats, while ensuring that the
right people have flexible, manageable access to the information that they need."

Forbes: Oracle
And IBM Get Complicated. Suddenly, Larry Ellison has IBM in a very awkward spot.
By Brian Caulfield. Excerpts: The big question: When Ellison is done slashing Sun's
costs, how many weapons will he have left? "They have the arsenal to compete
on levels with which they've never been able to compete before," says Crawford
Del Prete, executive vice president of research at IDC. "[But] we really need
to see what plays they want to run." The next move is Ellison's. And the first
victims probably won't be at IBM. "We believe we'll be able to run Sun at substantially
higher margins," Oracle President Safra Catz said on a conference call Monday,
promising investors an additional $1.5 billion in operating income a year.

That means cuts, big cuts. "Do they scale back the server business? Do
they move away from SPARC [microprocessor] business?" Del Prete said. "Maybe
they spin off the tape business ... to IBM?"

ZD-Net: Report:
Fraud and deception at Satyam was deep. Posted by Sam Diaz. Excerpt: The fraud
and deception at Satyam Computer Services in India was so in-depth that it included
dual accounting books, thousands of forged invoices, thousands of unnecessary employees
and dozens of fake bank statements, according to court records analyzed by the New
York Times. Through the deception, managers, auditors and an adviser were able to
create a perception that the company was “carrying out huge volumes of business”
so it attract potential customers and investors, according to the NYT. All the while,
cash was flowing into the hands of those who architected the deception.

The Register: HP
packing workers seal bosses in conference room. By Joe Fay. Excerpts: Workers
bossnapped five execs at a French logistics plant yesterday, amidst anger at HP's
decision to switch printer packaging activities to Malaysia. Workers at FM Logistics
at Woippy in NE France are angry that 400 jobs are set to go at the firm, after HP,
a major customer, decided to shift its printer packing business from Woippy to SE
Asia.

The "restructuring" has gone down like a a tonne of bricks with les
workers, and during a meeting about the process yesterday, they decided it was
time for some actione direct. "Judging the (redundancy) measures insufficient,
around 125 workers decided to apply pressure," said Bruno Damien of the
CFE-CGC trade union to the AFP. The five execs were barricaded into the conference
room. The workers freed a female member of the team and planned to hold the male
bosses over night.

New York Times: When
Cloud Computing Doesn’t Make Sense. By Steve Lohr. Excerpts: Clouds, clouds,
clouds. Everyone talks about Google-style cloud computing — software as services
off in the Internet “cloud” — as the future. But while cloud computing is a marketing
triumph, new research from McKinsey & Company asserts that trying to adopt the
cloud model would be a money-losing mistake for most large corporations. The research
is being presented at a symposium on Wednesday afternoon, sponsored by the Uptime
Institute, a research and advisory organization that focuses on improving the efficiency
of data centers.

The McKinsey study, “Clearing the Air on Cloud Computing,” concludes that outsourcing
a typical corporate data center to a cloud service would more than double the
cost. Its study uses Amazon.com’s Web service offering as the price of outsourced
cloud computing, since its service is the best-known and it publishes its costs.
On that basis, according to McKinsey, the total cost of the data center functions
would be $366 a month per unit of computing output, compared with $150 a month
for the conventional data center. “The industry has assumed the financial benefits
of cloud computing and, in our view, that’s a faulty assumption,” said Will Forrest,
a principal at McKinsey, who led the study.

New on the Alliance@IBM Site

IBM Italy Union questions
executive perks. Excerpts: We’d like to inform you that we have started in
Italy a national campaign against IBM manager’s excessive bonuses. In the middle
of the economical global crisis, and during 9600 job cuts in IBM US, the management
of GTS department of IBM Italy reserved for themselves a large reward and in
addition went on a free holiday to a famous and expensive resort. Our cost estimate
for this holiday is between $40000 and $150000. This waste of money by IBM Italy
management is not fair and is offensive in the opinion of IBM workers. ...

Revenue and dividends are going only to the investors, and year after year
more bonuses are going to IBM managers. This is having a negative affect on
the morale of IBM employees. Bonuses to corporate management are under scrutiny
by President Barack Obama’s administration. Management bonuses are also under
the control of Sam Palmisano, our CEO and Corporate Social Responsibility offices.
We will no longer accept these excessive benefits to IBM managers. We ask IBM
to reinvest money in the direction of IBM workers (main stakeholders of this
company), and especially to the employees that have not received salary increases
for 7 or 10 years. On top of this many education course are cut due to low
funds.

Comment 04/17/09: so here's a query for anybody who has been around enough to
know - is leaving IBM for one of the other tech giants - say, Microsoft, Cisco,
EMC, HP for examples that come to mind - a material improvement? Are they any
better? -Wondering-

Comment 04/17/09: There is a resource on this site that many of you facing an "uncertain
future" may want to look at. Go to the "Job Cuts" link in the left
column and look at the "Job Cut Survival Kit". I also posted my own
list (from experience) but it may be a bit dated now. See: Job Cut Archive - dated
05/12/08. I would like for someone else to post their more recent experience for
the benefit of others. -Neal Watkins-

Comment 04/17/09: I have been told that GBS AMS SEA&T will RA'ed the remaining
members of the practice by the end of the year since everything will be shifted
over to India. People on commercial accounts will be re-assigned to other practice
groups within GBS. If you are on a IGA Project, you are training your replacements
in India. -Concerned in SEA&T-

Comment 04/18/09: To Wondering: All of the tech companies are offshoring US
jobs and they will continue to do so until tax laws on overseas profits are changed.
The 5% (instead of 35%) tax on "repatriated" profits from overseas is
probably MORE of an incentive than the cheaper labor. They spend $100s of millions
lobbying to keep these tax breaks. It's totally backwards. The tax rate for companies
hiring and keeping American workers should be LOWER than taxes on overseas labor.
The bottom line is the ONLY thing that matters to these companies. Write your
reps in Congress! http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/11/AR2009041102035.html?hpid=topnews -annonymous-

Comment 04/18/09: In New York the WARN act, recently changed, has some people
leaving at the end of April with 30 days notice, but some leaving at the end of
June with 90 days notice. It depends on the number of people being let go. The
oddest part is that you can be in the same department, have the same manager,
but if it shows one person works in East Fishkill they got 90 days notice, and
the other in Poughkeepsie, they got 30 days notice. The last warn act for East
Fishkill indicated 54 people - and they all got 90 days notice -To -RJ- -

Comment 04/19/09: So you want to be part of the next layoff? The best thing
to do is volunteer (I did and it worked) I started it jokingly and just kept
jokingly volunteering every time the subject of potential layoffs was brought
up. It helps if you have a good old time manager or at least a good working relationship
with your manager. If you really want to leave, the severance package is not bad,
especially for those of us who can retire. -another old timer-

Comment 04/20/09: I was laid off in the "first wave" on Feb 24th.
I wanted to let you know that you might want to post a bulletin about this on
the front page of the site, for anyone who, like me, elected to take Cobra coverage.
Under the Recovery Plan, employers were supposed to have info on the gov't subsidy
of cobra to former employees no later than April 18, and be implementing it no
later than than May billing. I called the ESC this morning because I received
my bill Saturday for May's payment. I was being billed in full.

When I talked to the ESC on 4/1, they had said to pay the bill in full for
March/April, and then the May bill would be reduced by the 65% gov't subsidy,
and I would receive a refund for the 65% I had overpaid for March/April.
Well, I have received no refund, and now am being billed in full again. So
I called the ESC.... was told that the info packets were being mailed out
TODAY - 2 days after the gov't deadline to have the info in employees hands.
Then I was told that even though they understand that at this point they
owe me money, I need to go ahead and pay the bill I just received. That they
will be sending out corrected bills in a few weeks, but to avoid cancellation
of my benefits, I should go ahead and pay it to be safe (I'm scheduled for
surgery - they've got me right where I have no choice).

So I called the hotline for the Dept of Labor, and told them the story.
They checked their system and said IBM has already received the gov't funds
to cover the 65% of the cobra payments. IBM has already gotten the money,
now they've collected more money than they should from me for over 3 months,
and keep telling me to just kept paying I'll be refunded eventually. The
DOL woman said if they get enough instances of this, IBM can be fined,
and if there are enough instances of former employees not receiving the
info by the deadline, there will be repercussions for that as well. Her
words were that if other companies were able to meet the deadlines and
have the info out to people over a week ago, there is no excuse for IBM,
and there is no excuse for them to be telling me to pay more than I owe
when the subsidy money is in their pocket already. The # for the DOL hotline
is 866-444-3272. You may have to have a benefits advisor call you back.
-TiredofIBM-

Alliance Reply: Thank you for this very valuable information.
We appreciate you sharing this with everyone here.

Comment 04/20/09: Wanted to give an update - Just got a call back from the Dept
of Labor with one of the supervisors from the ESC on the line. Apparently,
after I filed my complaint, the DOL wasted no time in taking them to task, the
ESC woman even said "this is a huge embarrassment that the US Government
is finding us so unprofessional". As far as my particular Cobra billing
goes, it is now corrected, and even showing a credit on my account (guy earlier
told me to send more money!!) covering me through June! The DOL woman made sure
to say several times on the call that it was being recorded.... and that even
though they close at 4:45 there were still 115 callers in the queue today. So
I hope there were some more former IBMers who called in. DOL also gave me her
direct number to call if for some reason IBM sends me another screwed up bill.
-TiredofIBM- Alliance
Reply: Proof positive that fighting back, works. Thank you for the phone
# 866-444-3272 and keeping us up-to-date. This is why they call it "activism";
because people like you CHOOSE to act instead of whatever else... Good job.

Comment 04/20/09: Folks in STG, be warned! Another round of layoffs in June!
I have learned this from a host of reliable sources. Managers already know who
is going to get the ax. Signs to know you're the one: 1. Your assignments have
been slowly delegated to someone else, stating that person is your "back-up." 2.
You have not been delegated any new assignments. 3. Your manager has been avoiding
eye/face to face contact with you. 4. Encouraging you to "job post." 5.
You seem to be kept "out of the loop." These are just a few signs.
Volunteering to be RA'd may not help; it won't change who they already picked
to be ax'd. If you avoided LEAN or have not been involved, be very worried. Good
luck. -Ready 2B Next-

Comment 04/20/09: Thought you guys might want to know how much better things
are for a unionized workforce. The company my husband works for (commercial jets)
has not laid anyone off, although pilots are sitting at home on stand by as in-flight
times have decreased by 30% in the past few months. Past week, the employees have
been given options to take 4 to 12 months off with full benefits and retain 40%
of their salary while on leave! And not one person has been laid off, although
they actually do not have work for everyone. -Anonymous-

Comment 04/21/09: I was laid off from IBM Canada in Feb.2009, after 3yrs of
excellent service. I have been fortunate to land a job which seems to be better
than my career at IBM. To those of you worrying about employment, well the market
is not as bad as the news pushes. For sure all of you will find better, if not
the same, opportunities outside IBM. For those of you still at IBM, best wishes,
but open your eyes...you could be the next lucky laid-off IBMer :-) -Happily.Laid.Off-

Comment 04/21/09: Finally pulled out the layoff numbers from manager: 36 people
out of 98 in our org. -layoff_numbers- Alliance Reply: We need
more details. What org? What kind of work? Anything being offshored?

Comment 04/22/09: The numbers i previously posted are for division 6C - MD Application
Delivery.. Jobs gone are all technical i.e. DBAs, developers.. all managers
are intact.. The jobs are outsourced in an indirect way.. In the past few
months more Brazilian, Belorussian folks arriving, although most of us were told
that our jobs were being dissolved /consolidated into the jobs of people remaining.
As far as training GRs, it's been happening for the last 5 years and has
been a continuous process for us. Note that the turn around is quite high - they
usually stay no more than couple years, get the skills and leave. And then we
have to train again and fix the mess that was left. Well soon there will be noone
to do the training. -layoff_numbers-

Comment 04/22/09: I started IBM on 3/5/84 and was laid off 2/23//09. I was let
go less than 2 weeks before my 25th service anniversary. Would they let me
stay on for 2 weeks so I could be in the Quarter Century Club? NO. 25 years of
dedication to this company. Heartless! My appraisal record is 2+, 2+, 2+. I was
a strong contributor but I got this treatment. Thought you should know as there
are likely others out there like me. -Anonymous-

Comment 04/23/09: Yeah, working at a deli looks better all the time. IBM has
always been an unfair political jungle. I would love leaving with severance and
having some kid with a family keep their job. That's not how the system works.
So join the union. Have a voice if you want change. I focus on doing a quality
job because I know that is irreplaceable. I don't believe it will save my job.
I believe it will help someone somewhere and that's what we're all about. If we
loose this battle through pettiness and laziness that is sadder than loosing something
worth working for. -KeepWorking- Alliance reply: Thank you for adding your voice
in encouraging employees to join the Alliance. Unfortunately people are still
dragging their feet. Only 13 have joined this month. There is power in numbers
but the numbers have to come first.

Comment 04/23/09: I was RA'd Jan/Feb. My manager knew about it in early November.
My guess is that the number of cuts are decided annually. For 2009, it probably
happened last summer or earlier. People keep forgetting cuts are made EVERY year
- recession or no recession - and will keep on doing it to offshore jobs to cheaper
countries & keep pension & salary costs as low as possible. The only way
to stop it is to change the laws (taxes, WARN, etc) that encourage this activity
and unionize. At least w/a union there would be a more level playing field and
some fairness in cuts. -annonymous-

Comment 04/24/09: Div.7 Service Delivery Mgmt. 12 yrs at IBM. I was informed
this week that my accounts were going to Brazil. Asked mgr. how long do I have
left to be employed? Mgr stated that this phone call was about transitioning my
accounts. It wasn't a RA call. Just so you know mgr. couldn't be honest that I
would be RA'd in the next round. I have heard from reliable sources next round
is in June. My ratings have always been a 2+ over the last 10 years. I Skills
and performance doesn't matter any longer. Company is looking at age, years of
service, vacation time. IBM doesn't want to pay medical benefits for older employees.
Need 15 yrs and age 55 to be eligible for retiree medical and enhanced credit
toward cash balance pension. These are the folks they are targeting. -NextToGo-

Comment 04/24/09: I am one of the recently RA'd and I can tell you that there
are a lot of IT jobs out there, but they are very specialized and are going
to less experienced, younger workers. I have over 20+ years in IT and I have found
that mentioning this is a death sentence when looking for a job. Unless you
are looking for a management position, keep your work history down to 10-12 years
maximum. That makes it harder for potential employers to guess your age and
discount your resume. Good luck to all the current and past RA's. -daveserv-

Comment 04/16/09: Since I work at a customer site where we cannot have our IBM
laptop, I will simply drive to the IBM Office twice a week and expense the distance
if they stop reimbursing me for my internet access. We'll see how 88 miles a week
stack up to internet reimbursement -Anonymous-

Comment 4/22/09: My current mgr is days away from full retirement. I asked him
what the deal was with salary plan and if he had already finished the planning
for the dept or if our new interim was going to get that job....he said the input
process had been delayed til sometime in May or June, which obviously means that
the raises, if they happen, will not be on the same schedule as prior years. -Not
optimistic-

Comment 4/24/09: Not optimistic , the plan is done. it is pretty much plug and
play over the last several years. all based on the pbc rating which then is plugged
into the algorithm and the numbers pop out. manager has a little room but needs
to meet the budget number that are sent down from above. your new manager will
only execute the plan when he/she is told to. -retired-

News and Opinion Concerning the U.S. Financial Crisis

"It is a restatement of laissez-faire-let things take their natural course
without government interference. If people manage to become prosperous, good. If they starve, or have no
place to live, or no money to pay medical bills, they have only themselves to blame; it is not the responsibility
of society. We mustn't make people dependent on government- it is bad for them, the argument goes. Better
hunger than dependency, better sickness than dependency."

"But dependency on government has never been bad for the rich. The pretense of the
laissez-faire people is that only the poor are dependent on government, while the rich take care of themselves.
This argument manages to ignore all of modern history, which shows a consistent record of laissez-faire
for the poor, but enormous government intervention for the rich." From Economic
Justice: The American Class System, from the book Declarations of Independence by
Howard Zinn.

Huffington Post: The
Parts of The 401(k) Disaster Story 60 Minutes DIDN'T Report. By Bill Mann.
Excerpts: The whole sordid 401(k) saga largely involves big corporations dumping
their pension plans and pushing 401(k)'s and then brazenly gaming the bankruptcy
laws. The story has, sadly, largely gone unnoticed and unreported these past few
months during the stock-market meltdown and housing/bank scandals.

How did we even come to have 401(k)'s in the first place? Why didn't we just
keep company pensions, which worked fine for most people for years? The questions
get even more interesting (and "60 Minutes" didn't address this big
one): Why and how was much of the cost of employee retirement savings dumped
on individual workers - and then taken off companies' books -- in the 1980's? And
finally: Why would anyone assume that most people have the time, inclination
or talent to be savvy investors?

The answers can be found in an absorbing report called "Can
You Afford to Retire?" It originally aired on PBS's estimable "Frontline" investigative
series in May, 2006, and the reporter was veteran New York Times journalist
Hedrick Smith. (Smith's new "Frontline" report this week, on widespread
and dangerous PCB pollution of the Chesapeake Bay and Puget Sound, "Poisoned
Waters," as usual, got strong reviews).

Anyone with a 401(k) -- cratered-out or otherwise -- or a pension plan, or
anyone whose company may go bankrupt, should try to watch Smith's piece, which
is still there in its entirety at "Frontline's" web site. Caveat:
Be prepared to shake your head in amazement and swear a lot. ...

But, explained Smith, "what got lost in all the euphoria" about "empowering" the
small investor was "the enormous shift in who was now paying for retirement." That's
the biggest story here. Corporations, said Smith, quickly realized that 401(k)'s
would save them a shitload of money (here I employ an obscure accounting term).
It would only cost them 50% of what pensions had cost before. ...

In 1978, Smith reported, workers put in only 11 percent of total contributions
to retirement plans while corporations put in 89 percent. By 2000, the employee
share had jumped way up to 51 percent - and the company share had fallen to
49 percent. That's a tidy cost savings of 40%. for companies. So who needed
pensions? They were so...outdated.

Vault Message Board Posts

If you hire good people and treat them well, they will try to do a good job.
They will stimulate one another by their vigor and example.
They will set a fast pace for themselves.
Then if they are well led and occasionally inspired, if they understand what the company is trying to do and know they will
share in its sucess, they will contribute in a major way.
The customer will get the superior service he is looking for. The result is profit to customers, employees, and to stcckholders.
—Thomas J. Watson, Jr., from A
Business and Its Beliefs: The Ideas That Helped Build IBM.

This site is designed to allow IBM Employees to communicate and share methods of protecting their rights through the
establishment of an IBM Employees Labor Union. Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act states it is a
violation for Employers to spy on union gatherings, or pretend to spy. For the purpose of the National Labor Relations
Act, notice is given that this site and all of its content, messages, communications, or other content is considered
to be a union gathering.