Will this be enough to boost the housing market? I don't know, but I do think that until the Fed gets into the Mortgage Backed Securities market, resulting in pushing interest rates down, the housing market will basically be stalled. I've been floating on my refinance hoping that the rates would drop back down to the 5% and below levels. I'm leaning toward going forward, stop the waiting and just get on with it.

For First Time HomebuyersThe first provision is fairly well-known. It gives first-time home buyers an $8,000 tax credit provided they purchase a home between January 1, 2009 and August 31, 2009.This is a true tax credit.The $8,000 credit requires home buyers to hold property for at least 3 years. If the home is sold in fewer than 3 years, the tax credit must be repaid to the government. Bummer.It’s also worth noting that the date range applies closings and not sales agreements.Closings must occur within these 8 months to be eligible.

Unless and until policymakers and politicians are willing to face up to reality, we are simply repeating the same mistakes Japan made in the 1990s and allowing " government?s the off live to banks zombie?

These banks will have an insatiable appetite for funds and, like all zombies, will try to eat our brains. From the looks of what's coming out of Washington, maybe they already have.Posted Feb 11, 2009 11:26am EST by Aaron Task

In the next section(s) of the book Larry Burkett gives brief historical synopsis of Germany and Argentina and their economy, or should we say economic crashes. I will not pretend to be a history buff or even fully understand the economic structure and collapse of these two countries' economies, but I can at least pass on what I consider to be the highlights. What I mean by highlights is what think seems relevant to what we are experiencing today. The extra emphasis below is all mine.

The first example is Germany in 1918:

When the German government made the decision to print the money it needed, it was hailed by progressive economists as an enlightened move. The "enlightened" philosophy was that currency should not be linked to precious metals anyway, since it allowed for no direct government control over the economy. This philosophy would eventually resurface in America during the "New Deal."…To compensate for the lack of currency, the Reichsbank (the German equivalent of our Federal Reserve) authorized the printing of more currency. This would prove to be the downfall of the German economy and, ultimately, the Republic. As I commented previously, when any government makes the decision to inflate its economy through debt, eventually it will be faced with more difficult decisions about how to repay that debt. As long as the debt is held by its own people, the solutions are somewhat easier because it is in their interests to maintain the system. When the debt is held by foreigners, however, there is no choice but to either pay up or risk losing the ability to trade with other nations. Inevitably the government is faced with three basic choices: default, raise taxes, to inflate the currency.…Once hyperinflation struck Germany, bank loans were indexed to the currency devaluation. But since wages were not indexed, the loans escalated far beyond the average worker's ability to repay them. Most average-income workers lost everything they owned. This massive shift of wealth would later pave the way for the National Socialist Party (Nazis) to grasp power. The wealthy got wealthier, and the middle class got wiped out.…The deutschemark became worthless. Lifetimes of savings were wiped out, and the only form of trade for most Germans was barter.…The net result of hyperinflation was the dissolution of the German government. After the collapse of the economy, Germans turned to socialism, believing that the free-enterprise system had failed them. When the depression of 1929 struck, Germany still had not recovered from the devastating effects of the earlier collapse.

The second example was Argentina in 1940:

In 1940 Argentina was one of the world's fastest developing countries. The example of Argentina is what not to do to an economy. The Argentine leaders were greatly influenced by American economists who followed the theory know as Keynesian Economics. To refresh your memory, this is the philosophy that the central government should control the economy for the "good" of the workers. To implement Keynesian economics requires both a strong central monetary system, such as the Federal Reserve, and the ability to inflate the currency when necessary.…By 1980 their debt was $44 billion – nearly matching their GNP and requiring half of the government's income just to service the interest on the debt. … The Argentine government was faced with three choices: default, raise taxes, or inflate the currency.…If Argentina had simply defaulted on its debt, virtually all access to any additional loans would have been cut off. The second option of tax increases (and spending cutbacks) would seem the most logical approach. After all, that's what is expected of individuals when they overspend their own budgets, isn't it? But Argentina already had a tax rate of 40 percent and a government that was spending money faster than the people could make it. Instead, the Argentine government, just as the Germans did some sixty years earlier, opted for the easy way out and began to inflate its currency. Simply put, they printed the money they needed.…The government estimated that inflation would increase about 20 percent as a result of their actions. Instead it rose by nearly 700 percent! The middle class in Argentina was rapidly being wiped out. Retirees, pensioners, and those living on fixed incomes were destitute in less than a month.…By January of 1990 the annualized inflation rate was about 5,600 percent. Prices tripled while Argentineans slept.…In an effort to gain at least some degree of control over inflation, the government (at the insistence of the World Bank) established the equivalent of martial law over the economy. The currency was frozen and the printing of any new money was forbidden; wages and prices were frozen; black marketing was punishable by long prison sentences; and so on. This helped to establish some semblance of sanity in an insane system, and by early 1991 inflation was reduced to a mere 300 percent per year.

I see three clear cut issues from what Burkett describes in both of these prior examples.

There were 3 choices as a result of debt: default, increase taxes, print more money (inflate the currency).

If you are thinking about buying a home soon, 2009 may be the best year in a long time. Rates are down as low as they've been in years and now the 2009 Economic Stimulus Package includes a homebuyers tax credit. There is one version in the Senate which has a$15,000 Homebuyers Tax Credit and one version in the House which has a $7,500 credit, but only one of or a completely new version will survive.There was an earlier version of the tax credit in 2008 as well. Confused yet about the 2008 tax credit and the proposed 2009 tax credit? Click on the links above to read the 2009 Economic Stimulus Package and the $15,000 Homebuyers Tax Credit – All the answers to your questions from the Investing Blog. This post is a good outline of the differences and will be kept it up to date as things progress through congress. So be sure and check back often as the package goes to vote in both houses of congress and then across the president's desk.

What Does the So-Called “Stimulus Package” Mean For You?It means you pay.You pay for more bailouts, more giveaways, more wastefulspending...and your children and grandchildren pay for trillions of dollars ofdebt.But you can fight back right now. By signing the petition, you canjoin the thousands of Americans who are saying NO!

It's tax time again and one thing that came to my attention this year is the number allowance that I claim on my W-4 form with my employer.

Form W-4 is completed so that your employer can withhold the correct federal income tax from your pay. You should consider evaluating your W-4 allowances each year as you financial situation changes. To complete the W-4 Form, you specify marital status, and the number of exemptions or allowances you wish to claim. As the number of exemptions you claim increases, the amount of tax withheld decreases, and vice versa. You also have the option of specifying additional flat dollar amounts to be withheld.

If you tax return for 2008 is greater than $500, I would suggest evaluating and possibly increasing the number of allowance you claim on your W-4. This can be change any time. Each employer will have a different way of making the changes though so check with your payroll or human resources department. My employer gives us online access to submit changes to our W-4 forms and it will take effect on the next pay period which is nice.

For tax year 2007 our tax refund was more than $5,000 so I increased my allowances from 1 to 2. This was not nearly enough. This year (tax year 2008) our refund is more than $2,500. My employer provided some tables and a worksheet in order to make better decisions on the number of allowances you should claim. I also used a calculator from the IRS to evaluate my allowances. Using both came out with the same results. They indicated that I should be claiming 6 allowances and would still get an estimated return around $500.

So I dug a little farther and using details provided by my employer I was able to look at all my options. What I determined was that each additional allowance would knock $21 off the amount of taxes I was paying each pay period. So then divide $2,500 by 26 pay periods, is $96, then divided by $21 gives me 4.5 additional allowances I could claim to reduce the amount of taxes taken from my pay and therefore reduce the amount of money I was giving the government as an interest free loan. 4.5 plus the original 2 allowances equals 6.5, but since it has to be a whole number, I will settle on 6 allowances.

This will increase my wages by $84 per pay period or $168 per month!

Talk about a raise! My employer said "no pay raises this year", well I'll just give myself a raise.

I'd rather get $168 more per month than one lump sum in March or April. I've learned that I can do more with my money than the government can anyway. All they would do is SPEND it on something I don't agree with. I need to build up my emergency fund, add to my kids college fund, increase my retirement, pay off my house early…I can think of far better ways to use my money than loan it to the government interest free!

Over the last couple of weeks I have went through Dave Ramsey's Baby Steps expanding out the smaller sub-steps of each one. In case you missed one of the steps or you are just getting here, below are links to each of the Expanded Baby Steps.

I hope you have or will read through each step and leave comments if you have any questions, ideas, or opinions.

Currently we give our tithe to our local church. There are miscellaneous offerings we give throughout the year and we are always blessed by those opportunities. I look forward to doing more of those things when we reach this step.

How awesome would it be to be able to invest in things other than your retirement and college fund(s)! Invest in something that you care about, something that you are passionate about maybe.

I really feel that once we have reached this point, 15-20 years down the line, that the experience we have will completely alter our views on lifestyle and luxury. I'm sure there will be some of increases, but that will not be at the top of our priority list.

Just like Proverbs 13:22 says "A good man leaves an inheritance for his children's children,"