Clarion 1972-05-12 Vol 47 No 16

"tbe Be"tbeL ,
CaRlon
friday, may 12
Bethel has decided how they feel about President Nixon's
recent announced action concerning Viet Nom. 43 % of the
student body, 452 out of 1044, responded to the student
senate poll through their P.o. 's on Wednesday, May 10th.
49% - 222 favored his adion
39% - 114 did not favor his action
6% - 28 felt indifferently
Editors for the CLARION and SPIRE were elected
last week by the Student Senate. Marshall Shelley will
be next year's newspaper editor while Bob Miko will
head up the yearbook.
AI Cooper was also considered for the CLARION
post and Peter Varros also ran for the SPIRE editor­ship.
Shelley presented the names of Fred Ogimachi
and Bruce Hoag to work with him on the CLARION.
He said he wanted to emphasize more columns by
different people on campus expressing opposing
views. "Bethel news would be the top concern, but
students' opinions of national issues would also be
printed," he said.
Miko said he would like to make the 1972-73
SPIRE "resemble" an 1890 photo album. "Super-nos­talgia
will be the main emphasis. Ginger Me~calf will
assist Bob on the yearbook.
Marshall Shelly
vol. xlvii no. 16
Bob Miko
This issue of The Clarion represents the close of
another school year. For me it marks the end of one and a
half years of being the Editor-in-Chief. In those one and a
half years I have many people to thank for making The Bethel
Clarion the success that it is today.
When I first started out I knew very little .... it was
Toni Magnuson who patiently worked under me as copy-edi­tor,
teaching me how to do top-notch work. This year it was the
efforts of Judy Harrington and Marshall Shelley, Copy and
Production-Editors, who patiently endured strange and de­manding
'quirks that I have acquired over the p'ast twenty­five
years of my life. To them lowe a special thanks, for
they are both Freshmen and to make the adjustment to Bethel
College is hard enough without having to adjust to me also.
Reflecting back over my editorship I see many things
that I would change, but on the whole I can say that the dir­ection,
the spirit, of The Bethel Clarion was what I was most
concerned about. This was the area in which I believe that I
was most successful. My goal for the paper was that I felt that
there was a need to express radically - that is, get to the
root of things - the options of a truly Christian way of
viewing reality. Too often we allow the situation to dictate
our response.
To proclaim Jesus as Lord of all creation, and not just a
Sunday deal, was perhaps the hardest thing for me to express.
But I am thankful that God allowed me to see the fruits of
that labour. There were times that I felt like the madman in
Nietzsche's Joyful Wisdom. The madman enters the market
place proclaiming the death of god. He is met with people who
don't hear his words and go on about the business of the mar­ket,
some pausing occasionally to say what a nice day it was.
Here was a man screaming at the top of his lungs-and no one
heard him. He walked away realizing that he had come too
soon.
But then there were times when people came up to me
and said, I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU SAID!!!!! Ah, how I
thank God that He has revealed to others what He has shown
me. To have someone say that Jesus is Lord over everything,
there is no sacred/secular, church /world, full-time/laymen,
soul-winning/social concern, or evangelism/social concern
dualities in the world because then God receives only partial
service, half of his full due ..... Then to watch as they grow in
maturity and understanding of what this means in their
school life, that we aren't here solely for tomorrow, but that
God has CALLED us to be students. It is here where the
struggle to live is felt the most.
My failures are too numerous to mention, but one I
should mention is in the form of an apology. I am sorry that I
did not fuHill my responsibility to you, in that I never took
the time to acquaint myself with the struggles that you were
going through and tried to get you into mine. Consequently,
a lot of my editorials missed the mark.
One final word ... Viet Nam is once again an issue that
two
we as Christians have a responsibility to speak to.We must
speak in terms that are not "other-worldly," for Christ is
not "other-worldly." We are not allowed to stick our heads
in that well known sand and say it doesn't exist. It is really
too bad that we didn't organize a march and teach-in when
the South was invaded by the North. If we were truly against
killing in war we would have. As Christians I believe that
we must protect the South from the imperialist aggressors
from the North who seek to enslave the people. The action
that has been taken by Nixon should be applauded as being
the only way that we can peacefully bring an end to the war.
Instead it is trodden under foot. The damage we have done
is not in the multitudes who have died but. rather in the
furthering of the "anti-gospel" of "popular sovereignty" and
"the right of self-determination" (nationally). This "anti­gospel"
has done more to destroy the Viet Namese than any of
the bombs or bullets. Ask some one from the Third World
if it is so. The secularized religiosity of America kills the
people, they become the walking dead. For the sake of both
the Viet Namese people who seem to be headed for a night
without a dawn, and for the sake of America which faces
this night also, we must work for re-Christianization, in­tegrally
and exclusively, without any synthesis with non­Christian
convictions and world-and-life views. In the present
constellation that is the first contribution needed for world­peace.
For if the Christian man, also in the battle for world­peace,
it must still be said, what Joshua told God's people
when confronting a mighty powerful pagen world: "One man
of you shall chase a thousand." (Joshua 23:10). Perhaps that's
what you are here for ..... .
The new campus
isn't as new
as you think
by Dave Hoehl and Kevin Norberg
Even though this doesn't have anything to do with this
article, READ ON! IMPORTANT TRUTHS WILL BE RE­VEALED.
As you know, an important part of the new campus has
not been included for 1972-'73. (This is not because it has
bad breath.) This important facet of the new campus is the
PERFORMANCE ARTS BUILDING. Due to lack of funds,
this center has been excluded in the plans for next year.
YOU CAN HELP! HERE'S HOW:
Please list three people you can contact who would be
willing to contribute to this all-important, in excludable and
fantastically not-to-be-Ieft-out building! Your cooperation
is imperative in making the new Bethel College complete.
Fill out the form below. Please put "our copy" in P.O. 978
and put "your copy" in your pocket or purse (whichever
applies) THEN GET MOVINGI
Our Copy 1. _______________________________________________________________ _
2. _______________________________________________________________ _
3. _______________________________________________________________ _
Your Copy 1. _______________________________________________________________ _
2. _______________________________________________________________ _
3. __ ,, ____________________________________________________________ _
Concerned students
hold teach.in
on Nixon's new
Viet Nam policy
by G. William. Car/,.son
Instructor in History and Political Science
The. recent decision by President Nixon to mine and
"blockade" the North Vietnamese ports has raised before
the American public once again the problems of the goals
and means of our Indo-China policy. A group of about
50 students and faculty got together Oil Tuesday after­noon
in the middle of campus to explore what means
could be used to express concern about the direclions and
risks of this policy and to try to organize a medium
through which the Bethel community CQuid explore the
issues involved in thia decision.
Too often major histodcal events occur and tiley are
Dot discussed or analyzed within the Bethel community.
Often there is very little l'eactiOfl either positive or neg­ative.
This new policy which President Nixon adval'lced
raises severaJ serious questions which need to be ex­plored.
Firat, why has this policy which bas been around
for a long time ilot been used previously by other Ameri­cart
presidents from Eisenhower to Johnson? Second, does
the policy place in jeopardy Soviet-American relations on
such key issues as nuclear disarmament and limitation
of cold war rhetoric and crises? Th·ird .. is this decision
likely to develop a loealized conflict into one which puts
in direct confrontalion tile Soviet Union, the Peoples
Republic of China and the United Sta.tes? Fourth, how
long must the United Stales gove.rnment support and
maintain a political system in South Vietnam which Is not
clea.rly supported by the popula.ce. ts Vietmunizatioll the
besl. option In pursuing this objective? F'i./th, what prior­ity
should the Vietnam war have in relation to other
international and national problems facing \:.he American
policy makers. Should it binder the solutions to our in­ternal
economic and social problems. Should it place in
jeopardy Soviet-American initiatives in Western Europe
and the SALT talk negotiations.
It is hoped that the teach·in, the letter of concern
and the demonstrations along Snelling Ave. will be boHt
informative and intelligently provocative. We trust that
it will be done with a spirit of concern not only for the
implications of me pOlicy but also for the individuals
wbo live and learn on this campus. It is the duty of aU
American citizens to both question and analyze the
nature of the President's initiatives - to support him
when it is possible and a.¢tively optjose him when one
feels t!l.e Preaident's decisions are likely lo endanger the
interests of the country.
It is the hope of the teach-in tha.t each student will
be able to analyze the significant questions surrounding
Tuesday, May 9, ;nlllTudor Ca rlson and 50 student. met
to explore means of expreulon of disapproval of President
Nixon's recent Viet Nilm polley.
the nature of the President's policy and that after this
has been done to express your disapproval or approval,
dependent on which position you find .most tolex·a.ble.
For those who come to the conclusion that they
oppose the new war efforts one must express this oppo­sition
in a way that both expresses the OPPOsition and
remains consistent with the basis for the opposition. In
a day of reflection and the- period following may each
of you find it part of his obligation to search and seek
out the dil·ection he or she wishes tbis country to go and
how he or she wishes. to achieve these objectives. For me
I would recommend;
1. that Congress vote for immediate cut-off of war
funds.
2. that Congress consciously reorient the priorities
of the present militaristic economic and foreign
policies.
3. that the Anl.erican Governmenl enacl legisla.lion
for im.mediate American withdrawal from the war
and thereby enhance the release of American Prison­ers
of War.
0 •• , 21).000 II II over O"'G- t)ONG
SUit Sujt~ ••• , .. '-lfLOO "'en·, :-;iI .... W",,1 SII;I •. ~J6.SO
C:""hmtr~ T(.prll.1 .ISfI ;,0 Ca.hmon SEJ~n emus .$3.5.00
5w"~lcr" •••.•••• ,!!OOU Ca.hm""~ OyrrCUal5 ••. s.sa.so
• (;I~~c~ .......... ,I l.5() Sh;TI~ I ~lom,,~r~mm~eI). f 3.50
NEW rASH IONS t 1':'<~·h"I"ll:· J]ut)· a",1 ~f"ilJ!lId
H. K. TI\!LORS fOR APPOINTMENT,. CA,LL MR.
~: g ~8:f~~~ Jig V8.Watlt II the R.",..de ln~. TI!l! 73S-23lO
R1CHMONO, VA.
~2Z2
TnEPKO"~ A"YTIM~; I
threa
An interview
with George Wallace
by Don Catterson - College Press Service
cps: You are considered a populist candidate by many. Could
you give your definition of populism?
WALLACE: I've -been told that I sound populist. I don't
exactly know what they mean by the term myself. If it means
a movement of the people then I subscribe to it. You'll have to
draw your own definition of what you mean by populist but
I think it is a movement that pays some attention to the great
mass of citizens of our country.
Cps: Governor, in 1963 you made the statement "Segregation
now, tomorrow, forever" .....
WALLACE: That was in the context of the times that had been
allowed by law. I don't have any apologies to make on any
statement I made at any time that supports a system that
had been approved by the courts and by the people and by
the Supreme Court of the United States. That system is
gone now and we have non-discrimination as it's called and
its been accepted and we've accepted freedom of choice. Let
the people go to the school of their choice. They broke that
down with arbitrary rulings of closing schools, bussing students,
and setting quotas and percentages which we slightly object
to.
We believe in equal opportunities for all children and I
never have believed opposite to that and never did consider
any school system O.Ko'd by the courts the antithesis of that.
But when the courts came in and changed what they had O.K.'d
as being law, there was more resentment by the people of a
great number of states at the type of systems refered to. The
government's takeover end result is that we now have non­discrimination
in the school system, but we do object to the
government now coming along and setting percentages and
quotas, busing children and the great mass of people object
to that too.
Cps: You said in Philadelphia recently that forced segre­gation
was wrong just as forced integration was wrong. Nearly
seven years after the Supreme Court decided segregation was
against the law you stood in the schoolhouse door of the
University of Alabama ....
WALLACE: We were testing the admission policies and we were
raising a constitutional question. That decision in 1954 was
the law of the case and not the law of the land, and we were
trying to raise the question, a constitutional question, with the
Governor involved, really who can run the school system.
That school system eventually was going to allow people -
all citizens - in it anyway, but they did object very vigor­ously
to the government's take-over of the public schools.
Cps: Could you consider that same question from a non-legal
viewpoint, from a moral viewpoint. Should segregation
exist as a moral issue?
WALLACE: Moral matters emanate from the heart - and
nothing is immoral in this respect, if the person that feels
what he has done and the system he has provided is then, as
four
it was in those days, in the best interests of everybody. So
that's not a question any longer - that's over. There is more
integration now in the system in the south than there is
in Chicago.
CPS:What is your opinion of President Nixon's trip to China?
WALLACE: I thought the trip was ill-advised in view of the
fact that they were still killing American servicemen in
Southeast Asia, exporting heroin, and the trip was made
without prior consultation for any length of time with our
allies in the Far East. I thought it was a mistake, but since
he went, I hope it is successful. I hope it does just what he
thinks it will do and what he says he thinks it will do: that
it will be a step in the direction of world peace. I doubt it.
I think the best way to guarantee world peace at the present
time it to be strong militarily. I object to the necessity - I
mean I'm sorry for the necessity, rather, that we have to
spend so much money on the military. But in World War II
when we defeated the Nazis and the Germans there weren't
any objections raised by anybody to a strong military. But
if we had had a strong military in the beginning there might
not have been any war. Everybody was for the military then,
but now we find a great group, when our enemies are not the
Nazis and the Fascists but the Communists, that wants to
unilaterally disarm, which I think is a big threat to world
peace.
CPS: Do you feel we should have conscription during peace­time?
Do you think we should have the draft?
WALLACE: I would hope it could be volunteer but I would
be for limited conscription if that's the only way to have our
national security assured. But I'd rather have a volunteer
army. I served in the Armed Forces and I would like it to
be by choice but if our national security depended on the
draft I suppose I would be for it.
CPS: How would you propose to end the war n Vietnam?
WALLACE: Well, there's no way to end the war, it doesn't
look like, in Vietnam. It should have been ended years ago,
with conventional weapons. It would have been far more
merciful to have done it then with far less lives lost on both
sides. In the first place we shouldn't have been involved in a
land war in Asia. H the national interest required the use of
Wallace on Vietnam, pot
air power, well, all right, but once we got involved in a
land war in Asia we should have won it with conventional
weapons and if we had determined we couldn't win it years
ago we should have gotten out then.
I do feel that regarding that we should take what ever
action that is necessary with conventional firepower to pro­tect
the remaining American servicemen who are there so they
can safely withdraw. I want us to continue our withdrawal
but I don't want us to conclude the matter without success­fully
negotiating - I want the prisoners of war and MIA's
successfully negotiated back.
cps: Do you agree with President Nixon's policy of with­drawing
troops while continuing the bombing?
WALLACE: I would have hoped they could have been with­drawn
quicker but I hope that any President, Humphrey or
Nixon, either one, would be successful in their withdrawal
program but it looks like they (NLF-N. Vietnamese) are
trying to keep us from withdrawing, :trying to trap the re­maining
American servicemen over there. If they over-run
the South Vietnamese, which is difficult for them not to let
happen because they are fighting a defensive war in their
own land and they've never been allowed to be on the offen­sive,
and that's hard to do, then you've got the danger of the
American remaining troops being annihilated.
CPS: Is that your Dunkirk principle?
WALLACE: Yes, that's right .That's a real danger.
They've been doing the Peace Talks now for four years
and I was confidentially briefed by the President - Mr.
Nixon, Mr. Humphrey and myself were - in 1968, by tele­phone,
a conference call hook-up before there was any news
of it.
The North Vietnamese allegedly were supposed to re­spect
the DMZ and not shell the ' cities and not shoot at our
reconnaissance planes if we stopped the bombing. They've
violated everyone of those alleged agreements and we've
killed more people since the talks started than before the
talks began.
Cps: What is your position on marijuana legalization?
WALLACE: In Alabama we got the legislature to lower the
penalties for possession of marijuana and the mere use of it,
though not for pushers. We reduced it to a misdemeanor. I
thought the punishment was too severe and we got it
changed. But I am not for the legalization of marijuana. We've
got enough drunks with alcohol much less legalizing mari­juana.
I'm just not for that.
Although alcohol is legal and will be legal I think we
ought to have a policy of discouragement of it's use. I
think it's a big national problem.
Cps: How do you feel about legalizing abortion?
WALLACE: I'm not for legalized abortion. Just when the
health of the mother is involved. But just legalized abortion,
you know, come and get it and all - uh uh.
Cps: If you were President now would you regain full em­ployment
in this country? How would you bring the economy
back to full production?
WALLACE: I think the first way is to give general tax relief
to the mass of the citizenry and plug up tax loop holes. Short­ly
stated, I think this would boost the morale of every bus­inessman,
working man and farmer in the country and I
think it would increase production which would help cut
inflation - many economists say this.
I believe this would create more consumer spending
which, in turn, would create a demand for employment and
I believe that this morale boost which would increase pro­duction
in this country would aid us in the matter of bal­ance
of trade deficits. That's a first start.
In those areas that have high chronic unemployment I
would use some of the foreign aid money :that is unallocated
for public works projects in those particplar areas.
CPS: If you don't receive the Democratic Party's nomination
in Miami what do you hope to achieve by the successes of
your campaign?
WALLACE: We've already achieved one thing - all of the
candidates on eight out of ten isues are saying what I've been
saying since '68 and even before then but I feel I'm going
to get good treatment in Miami because they can't win the
election without the folks that support us - support me.
Cps: At your luncheon earlier today William Chaney, the
Grand Dragon of the Indiana Ku Klux Klan called you "his
kind of man" ...
WALLACE: Well, I can't comment on everybody who says
they support me. You know how I stand. I've never been a
supporter of that group.
I11111111I1
PIZZA PAPA
~ V.V' 4 •••••• 1
Featuring
PIZZA PAPA
1437 N. Cleveland
646-2621
EAT IN
CARRY OUT
DELIVERY
All Varieties
of Piping
Hot Pizza
and Tasty
Spaghetti!
EARL'S PIZZA PAPA
1748 N. Lexington
488-5585 r.----- COUPON 1-----.. i[el ~~,~ ! I ONE COUPON PER ORDER or Full Spaghetti order
'-'__ Coupon Expir~s June 1, 1972 1 __
five
Nelson reports on his
first month in office
Student Association Preside'nt Dan Nelson
This is the first in a series of reports to you about my
experiences and involvement in the office of student associa­tion
president. Because you elected me to this position, I feel
a responsibility not only to represent the students of the
Bethel Student Association, but to report back to you on what
I am doing.
I am greatly encouraged by the interest that students
have shown in student government at Bethel. I was told
before the elections that, as a whole, the student body was
very apathetic. If this were true, the picture has radically
changed. After a very good turnout at the elections, students
have continued their involvement. In my speech in Chapel,
I said that I did not think the president should be a senator­at-
extra-Iarge, proposing the bulk of the legislation for senate
consideration. So far, I have not had to propose any bills -
your se'nators have introduced more legislation than we some­times
have time to act upon.
An important part of the student representation in our
school's decision-making process is through student-faculty
committees. At the time of this writing, over 40 students have
already responded to my letter asking for volunteers for these
posts. This is also very encouraging to me.
Some of the things that a student body president does
probably never demand much student attention, yet they are
important to the functioning of the office. A recent week will
provide a typical example. During the week I did the fol­lowing:
-talked with Dave Nelson and Terry Norr (in the Admis­sions
Dept.) about next year's freshman class, after which
I wrote a letter to the entering freshmen describing stu­dent
government and opportunities at Bethel;
Garnet's Standard Service
Complete
Service
for
Your
Car
Larpenteur and Snelling
St. Paul
Friendly
Courteous
Conscientious
Men
MI 4·2027 Waiting
jflamthurgtr
to
Serve
You
1533 W. Larpenteur
TAKE OUT ORDERS OPEN 24 HOURS
phone 645-6092
six
-discussed the Communications Board faculty appointments
with President Lundquist;
-talked with John Carlson (Alumni Affairs) about the var­ious
contributions made to Bethel;
-conferred with the President of the Augsburg Student
Association concerning a loose coalition of student gov­ernments
of private colleges in this Metro area;
-discussed several student-oriented financial matters with
Dean Wessel:
(1) whatever became of our tuition money that the faculty
did not get in raises because of the wage-price freeze
(the teachers finally got their raises and received all pay
retroactively); (2) what about Bethel's involvement in
MPIRG and, (3) if enrollment is increase next year, could
the Student Association budget be increased (we will
soon find out these answers)
-appointed several people to students positions and,
-drew up a proposed budget for the 1972-73 year.
Just after I took office on April 1, I had to fulfill three
commiHments I made before my electon. These were a
forensic convention, a gospel-team trip and the Bethel band
tour. During my absence, Marty Mauk and Nancy Meyer
did a fine job of "holding down the fort" in the senate office.
Now that my committments are over, I would like to talk to
you about your suggestions, recommendations, and possibly
even gripes. My regular office hours are from 1:00 p.m. to
3:30 p.m. Tuesday-Friday. (Monday from 1:30). Irregular
hours are in the evening. The senate oHice even has a phone
-extension 208-for your input.
(Long Hair Is In - Have Us Shape It)
Falcon Barbershop
1713 N. Snelling
For Appointments Call 646-2323
Jim-Joe
Bethel lifestyle cones under attack
by Marshall Shelley
"Probably 30 per cent of the students at Bethel
do not conform to the lifestyle as it's dictated in the
catalogue," said Bob Miko. The Student Senate seemed
in agreement with him. They have recently passed the
following bill.
We, the Student Senate, recommend to the admin­istration
that all those people whom they know to be
living a life syle that is NOT in accordance with the
life style put forth in the· Bethel College Catalogue
NOT be allowed to attend Bethel College next semes­ter.
Any student, in the event his readmission is
denied, is guaranteed the right to appear before the
Student Personnel Committee before the end of the
semester.
We recommend that IF the administration fails
to take this action, that the administration change the
life style at Bethel to incorporate those persons who
are now not il;1c1uded in the present life style state­ment.
We feel that this action is necessary if we are to
live on this campus in honesty and integrity.
We would like to see action taken on this before
May 9,1972.
Miko, who co-sponsored the bill with Debra Ander­son
said, "I believe the conference churches are dic­tating
a lifestyle for Bethel that they themselves don't
keep. There are some deacons in conference churches
that couldn't be admitted to Bethel if the present
life style was enforced.
"The purpose of the bill is to refocus attention on
the lifestyle issue. The administration is not aware
that there is a problem. Are the rules set up as an ideal
or are they to reflect the way people actually live?
If it's an ideal, we should enforce it. If it's a reflec­tion
of the way students live, the lifestyle must be
changed. That is the reasoning behind the bill," Bob
said.
Most Bethel students seem to have a definite
opinion on this subject. Here are a few reactions.
BRIAN HOWARD: If you have rules, they must be
enforced. You have to have some rules for structure,
but a lot of rules here at Bethel are PR (public re­lations)
rules designed to satisfy Bethel's conserva­tive
backers. Ideally, there should be less rules at a
Christian school. There should be more trust.
AL COOPER: I think the lifestyle bill is good in
that it is pressing for honesty among faculty and
students.
RICH ZADERAKA: I don't like the idea that
Bethel can tell you how to live even when you live
off campus.
ROGER JAHN: I don't think President Lundquist can
act either way. If he attempts to enforce it, he would
find so many people not living in accordance with the
lifestyle that Bethel would have trouble financially.
On the other hand, he can't do away with the life­style
because he would get such a reaction from the
conference. It'll probably continue to go on as it is -
a few people will get caught, but the vast majority
will keep on going as they are.
Talk to your Senator, make your view known so
that they can better represent you.
Open for bowling
most anytime with
discounts to all
Bethel Students
631·1142 631·1143
ROSE BOWL
LANES
OPEN
LATE!
12:30 a.m.
Sun. thru Thurs.
ALL NIGHT FRI. & SAT.
UNCLE JOHN"S
FAMILY RESTAURANT
ROSEVILLE North at HiGlhw41V 36
seven
Larry Norman provokes
Reformational thinking
by Judy Harrington
After hearing Larry Norman last Fri­day
night, I really started to do some
thinking about our country, our Amer­ican
evangelical brand oj Christianity,
and my own life style, which is a result
of both. I put to the test some views I've
been half-holding all year, and came
away more convinced than ever of their
validity.
These views are the basic core of what
is called Reformational thinking. It's a
new philosophy - at least new to me -
a main proponent of which is Dr.
Francis Schaeffer. Some of Dr. Schaf­fer's
material I read last fall in Fresh­man
Colloquy. Quite possibly it is the
first Christian philosophy we've ever
had.
I like the Reformational thinking he­cause
it gives me a way of interpreting
the world as a Christian. In high school,
I read interpretations of men like Freud
(determinism), Sartre (existentialism),
and others. My evangelical background
hadn't provided me with a comprehen­sive
Christian world view with which to
confront my classes. This was high school
and my evangelical Campus Crusade
Christianity was already inadequate. My
instructors and fellow students were
brilliant, trapped, dying, crying and
searching, and all I could say was -
Jesus is the way. He's the answer. Be­lieve
in Jesus and you will be saved.
Brothers and Sisters, I hate to say it,
but these answers just didn't cut the
mustard. They weren't even answers
to the questions these people were ask­ing.
I was asking them to make a blind
leap of faith into Christianity - accept
Jesus, man, and everything will be o.k.
Is this all we can offer?
I think not.
You may say, "Isn't it enough to be·
lieve on Jesus? Believe on the Lord
Jesus Christ and thou snalt be saved -
that's what Scripture says." Yes, ac-eight
ceptance of Christ and repentance from
sin is the first and foremost message
of Scripture. But Scripture is more than
that basic message of salvation. It is
God's Word to man, a wealth of creative
thought which we have hardly begun to
tap. Behind its words lie the Truth -
something the apostle Paul evidently
had a good grasp of as he wrote his
epistles, but something we as modern
Christians have expended little effort
to think through. We cling to blind
faith in the 'basic concepts of Christian­ity
and the "mirror dimly" clause of
I Corinthians 13.
This is where Reformational thought
comes in. It challenges evangelicals to
start researching the meaning of their
own words.
We could start with "Jesus is the way."
In the complex world we live in today,
what do those words mean? Is there
"one way" to view the world, one way to
live, one Truth on which we can stand?
There may be, but we American Christ­ians
don't live as though there were. We
have compromised our Christianity with
the "Democratic Way of Life." It is
the route of Reason, of compromise
("Come, let us reason together ... "), and
of Humanism, which claims man's in­tellect
to be sovereign (by sovereign I
mean both supreme and independent).
The American way of life is a life auton­omous
from God. (I was thinking the
other day - how many of our nation's
founders were Christians? Was George
Washington? Benjamin Franklin? Thom­as
Jefferson?)
It believes in scientific method and the
efforts of man to save a dying society.
It has separated man from God - made
him independent - and gotten our
country into the complex fix we are in
today. Complex? NO, brothers and sis­ters,
merely clouded and muddied by
Satan! In the name of Him Whom we
call God, Who came to earth to become
man - God Incarnate - and once and
for all unite man and God, how much
longer are we going to suffer this? How
much longer will we take this denial of
Christ's lordship in our everyday lives?
As Larry Norman's song goes, "and to
think it could happen right here in
America ... wait till it happens to you."
There is so little time left - maybe
even 12 to 15 years at the most, accord­ing
to men like ecologist Dr. Paul Ehr­lich.
The world is dying. Our job is
tremendous. Lord, don't come quickly,
we've failed You and have so much yet
to do.
Bob Miko, editor of . the Clarion, is a
reformationist who likes to call his
beliefs "radical Christianity." That's
what his editorial column was entitled
spring semester of last year. I like
that term. It connotes the spartan, un­compromising
nature of reformational
thinking and an aspect of Christianity
which is unpopular in America - that of
the total Christian, a spat-on social
outcast. This is the aspect of Christian­ity
which Bonnie Greene was pointing
up in her article, "Radical Christians -
Are They Spiritual Niggers?" (Bethel
Clarion, April 28, p. 8). Perhaps Mrs.
Greene's points could have been better
stated, but the message comes across -
if we were all living the kinds of lives
we should be, we would be a despised,
misunderstood minority in this country.
"Every generation thinks the next
one might be able to make things right.
And the next one always blows it. Hasn't
man had enough time to make things
right?" said Larry Norman Friday night.
Right on, Larry, the time has come for
God's people to be heard.
But first, we must get ourselves to­gether.
We must commit ourselves to our
Lord, to each other and to our cause.
NOW OPENI
Fish Ircade
803 Washington, (upstairs)
Minneapolis (331-5191)
OPEN
8:30-5:00 Mon. thru Sat.
and till 9:00 Mon., Fri., & Sat.
Leatherwork Candles
Silversmithing Crafts
FISH BOOKSHOP
OPEN
8:30-5:00 Mon. thru Fri.
9:30-5:00 Saturday
Dinkydale-4th St. S.E.
, Minneapolis (in Dinky town )
(378-0094 )
Books Cassette Equipment
The Four Spiritual Laws were good as
far as they went, but a starving, milk­fed
world is now demanding meat. Right
now we have little or nothing to give
them. Our basic life style and world
view is no different than theirs. From
my own experience, I would say the
love we hold for each other and for
others is certainly no greater than
theirs. I'm glad the song "We Are One
in the Spirit" ends in the future tense­"
They will know we are Christians by
our love." If the line went, "They know
we are Christians by our love," the song
would be largely uncreditable.
We as Christians must be different
before we can make a difference in this
world. This bit of Reformational (radi­cally
Christian) thought barely skims
the surface of what the movement is all
about and is only the beginning of what
can be done. But, as I've said, it's a
place to start. Think it over, Brothers
and Sisters here at Bethel. Talk it
over. If it rings as true to your ears
as it did to mine, pray about it and see
if the Lord wants you to follow it up.
At any rate, start thinking about the
state of your country, if you really care,
and about your life style. Maybe your
life isn't as namby-pamby or compro­mised
as mine. Pray with me, though,
that God will raise up radical Christians
for our time - -in the little time we have
left.
Flowers, for me??!?
2001 West Larpenteur Avenue
St. Paul, Minnesota 55113
EST. 1906
STORE AND GREENHOUSES
175,000 Square Feet of Glass
Steve works on some props for LAMB'S PLAYERS before his historic departure
to sunny California.
Steve Terrell leaves Bethel
to work with Lamb's Players
by Brenda Barth
"When you say 'yes' to God, things
get better if you keep on saying yes,"
says Steve Terrell, who is leaving Beth­el
after this term. "There are no shocks;
it's just a matter of saying yes."
Steve has resigned from his position
as professor of speech and drama and
plans to devote his full-time efforts to
the ministry of Lamb's Players. Lamb's
Players is a Christian street drama group
which Steve has had a vision for for
some time.
Steve's past includes a career as a
Hollywood actor. He has performed on
such stage shows as "The Rainmaker,"
"Life with Mother," and, for three
years, in the TV series "Life with Fa­ther.
·' Movies in which he has ap­peared
include: "Tea and Sympathy,"
"The Four Seasons," with David Wayne,
"Moon Pilot," and "Posse from Hell,"
with Audie Murphy. He has also ap­peared
in some TV shows, some of which
are 'Ozzie and Harriet," "Gunsmoke,"
"Bonanza", "Maverick", "Have Gun Will
Travel," "Hallmark Hall of Fame',' and
"Wagon Train."
He left this "glamorous" career for
graduate work and teaching drama class­es
at Biola College. "I became dissatis­fied
with the work at Hollywood," says
Steve. "So much of that entertainment
is bad for the Christian. I couldn't con­tinue
because I had to do and say
things inconsistent with my beliefs."
At Biola College Terrell was given
charge of the drama team. "It was com­pletely
by chance that we found the
play, 'Revolt at the Portals.' Before we
knew it, the team was touring around
and performing it. Unfortunately, the
missions department at Biola gained con­trol
and exploited it for school purpos-es.
The play lost its artistic form and I
became discouraged."
In 1969 he came to Bethel. "All the
doors seemed to open for me to come
to Bethel. The administration under­stood
what I was trying to do with
drama. They have been open to my
ideas and have helped to promote them.
It's because of Bethel's help that I'm
able to make Lamb's Players my full
time work.".
Steve was given a Alumni Grant by
Bethel for the summer of 1970 whicl1
took him to Berkeley, California. "It
was there that I once again witnessed
the San Francisco Mime Troupe preach­ing
their message of Marxism through
the media of street drama. They were
very effective and crowds of hundreds
Sale!
10-50"10 Non-text
English books.
nine
-------------_ ..
Reflections upon leaving Bethel College after being here for
four years.
I'm sick of Hamburgers
I'm sick of eating in the cafeteria
I'm tired of my roommate going to bed at 9:00 every night
(Tom Ford).
and I'm tired of Bob Miko's B.S.'ing all the time.
But I have loved:
Stan Anderson's reference to my dating life
Don Larson's games
"Doc"
Mr. Correll's tongue-in-cheek
peanut butter cookies
and Dr. Wessel who did his best with me.
I'm really thankful to all of you people who have put up
with me. I'm not really sure how many of you received any­thing
from me, and I am sorry for the times I have let
many of you down and have been guilty of not loving, but
I have really tried to love you people.
I think that I have had more chapel exposure than Pastor
Lawson, and I have enjoyed almost every minute of it. As
I think about leaving this place, I'm not really sure how much
it is a part of me. It is like a friend that you have had for
so long that you have forgotten how to appreciate her. This
year as your Campus Co-ordinator has been the highlight
of my life, so thank you all for the opportunity of service.
I did the best I could do for you, so I hope that you were
pleased. But like you I also get tired of hearing old seniors
reminisce, because we all have to move on in life to new
experiences. So let this be my thank you to you all for the
joy and sadness of the last four years. You have taught me
much and you have made my life a very happy one, so
thank you and I hope that you continue to grow in consistency
and knowledge of Christ.
Bill Ankerberg
Glasses Contact Lenses
ELWOOD CARLSON
Optician
227-7818
272 Lowry Medical Arts
St. Paul, Minn. 55102
Dr. Lewis defends
Billy Graham's
TV appearance
Dear Editor,
I would like to "lock horns" with one of your guest
editors in the April 22nd issue of the Clarion. Mr. Wayne
Farr tells how he watched "with a half-attentive ear" the
Dick Cavett TV conversation with Billy Graham and Pat
Boone and found it "disgusting," the highly emotional term
you selected from his article for your headline.
By chance I also turned on the TV and observed the
same program. I recall how pleased I was at the "straight on"
way both the young believer from Hollywood and the veteran
evangelist witnessed to their Faith. Neither was preachy or
angry or radical in his criticism of society, which may explain
in part Mr. Farr's disgust. However, neither one disguised
his loyalty to the Word of God or pulled punches as to his
personal commitment to Christ.
When Billy Graham was asked bluntly about his personal
conduct before marriage he naturally raised a snicker from
the TV audience by aHirming his abstinence from sex. But,
most moderns find Graham'S view of chastity to be passe, if
not actually offensive.
As I see it, your guest writer has used a very glib tongue
(and your columns) to ridicule two .of his fellow believers.
His own credo may fall within the bounds of orthodoxy, but
will his kind of language prove to be more winsome in
witness than that of Billy or Pat?
Sincerely,
Art Lewis
The Imperials and Keystones
in concert at
St. Margaret's Academy High School Auditorium
252 Upton Avenue South
8:00 p.m. JUNE 5
Tickets at all major Bible bookstores
CONTACT: Mrs. B. J. Bear
537-5244
eleven
..
by Rich Zaderaka
I tried to be creative as I pondered my final Hot Corner.
I reflected over my experiences with the football team, the
wrestling team, the baseball team, all the sportswriting I had
done for the Clarion, my work at the radio station, and
couldn't come up with the unique "whatever" I was searching
for. My thoughts turned to the music department, the food
service, the athletic department, Curt Gowdy, Howard Cossell,
the soccer club, and referees, all of which have been sub­jected
to my scorn in the past two years.
Still not finding anything creative, I reminisced about
the Edgren bull sessions, the times I studied and the fun
times in the library. I thought about the "Library Man" who
use'd to yell at me for talking; the "Library Lady" who used
to yell at me for talking; and the "Library Girls" who always
gave me. dirty looks for talking. But still I didn't come up
with anything creative.
So coming to the conclusion that it is hard for a senior
to be inspired, I decided to take the easy out. Sorry about
that. For the people who weren't here last year, and for
seniors and others who like to reminisce, here are excerpts
from the Clarion files of 1969-70.
* * *
Bob Elliott and Mark Pound had just finished playing
a 145 yard hole and were about to move on to the next, when
a shot came over the ridge that hid the tee-off spot from
view. The ball stopped 18 inches from the cup.
"Let's give this fellow the thrill of his life," said Bob,
tapping the ball into the cup. They moved off a short distance
and watched as the golfer came over the ridge onto the
Sports • • • • • • • • • •
green, looked into the cup and saw the ball. His excited cry
stunned Bob and Mark. "Harry, Harry, I made it in SIX!
* * * *
ROYAL JV WINS: CLOUT CONS 25-0
The Bethel Junior Varsity squad defeated Stillwater
Prison Friday by the score of 25-0. Naturally it was a home
game for the prison team, None of the Stillwater backs were
able to "break away" for a long run; not long enough any­way.
The Bethel defense and the guards in the pressbox
saw to that. ...
* * *
I'm not trying to make excuses for the disappointing
weekend Bethel had in the Lea Invitational Tournament, but
I've seen better officiating at funerals. The refs were un­believable.
They blew more whistles than the Northern
Pacific.
Parsons College of Iowa won the championship, defeating
host Lea College 76-72. Some speculated that the tournament
was rigged for Lea to advance into the finals, and then to
stay that close to an outstanding Parsons squad.
I won't say it was. But Parsons had more depth than
the Bethel choir and their boys were cooler than a Frosty
Malt in a Siberian blizzard. And unless Parson's psyche for
the championship took a bigger dropoff than mid-semester
chapel attendance, I don't see how Lea could have kept it
within 20 points.
* * *
During the baseball team's spring trip to Florida, first
baseman Dennis Zaderaka acquired the nickname of "sheik".
Which prompted an exceptionally clever team-mate (guess
who?) to remark, "If Dennis was on third base and the next
batter drove him in, would that be 'bringing in the Sheik?'"
* * * *
One warm fall afternoon a little boy was begging his
grandfather to play football with him. "But I don't know
anything about football protested the old man.
"You must know something about it," replied the young­ster.
"Daddy said we would get a new car after you kicked
off."
* * * *
Well that's it. I hope you've enjoyed reading The Hot
Corner as much as I've enjoyed writing it. It's been my plea­sure.
So long everybody.
• • • •
With a 6-9 won-loss record, Bethel's
baseball te'am faces Concordia tomorrow
at Concordia. The Royals will be trying
to even their conference record at 4-4.
of the first inning and get six runs' in the
process.
For the first time in at least four
years, Bethel beat Hamline last week
11-2. Gary Clark and Marshall Shel­ley
each socked home runs in leading
the hitters. Don Paterson and Roger
Jahn combined pitching talents to check
Hamline's usually potent batters.
: Last Saturday, ·the Royals lost a
doubleheader to Northwestern of Iowa
12-0 and 2-0. Errors plagued Bethel in
the first game and lack of hitting was a
problem all day.
Bethel split a doubleheader with Carle­ton
Tuesday, wining the opener 3-3
before dropping the second game 3-1.
Carleton jumped out in front 2-0 in the
first inning if the first contest, but
Bethel bounced back to shell Carleton's
pitcher out of the game in the bottom
twelve
The second game was another case
of poor hitting. Bethel's only run came
when Jim Delich drag bunted for a
single, Bill Ferrin sacrificed him to
second, and pitcher Gary Paulson singled
to right.
* * * *
Both Bethel's tennis and track teams
have their conference contests this week­end.
The tennis team, with a 5-5 record,
plays in Sioux Falls this weekend. The
racketeers lost to powerful Hamline 9-0
Tuesday.
The tracksters will also be going
to Sioux Falls for the Tri-State Meet.
Last Saturday at the Macalester Invi­tational
Track Meet, Phil James placed
second in the 440 and Jim Hammarsky
took third in the triple jump.
iflt.-e,d.- reascflab/e
CCfltac t :
d. afltCfI cster "fa fI
e. ichn etsetj,
p.c.570 Cr 631-1665

Click tabs to swap between content that is broken into logical sections.

Reproduction or distribution of these files is permitted for educational and research purposes with proper attribution to the Bethel Digital Library. No commercial reproduction or distribution of these files is permitted under copyright law without the written permission of Bethel University Digital Library. For questions or further information on this collection, contact digital-library@bethel.edu.

"tbe Be"tbeL ,
CaRlon
friday, may 12
Bethel has decided how they feel about President Nixon's
recent announced action concerning Viet Nom. 43 % of the
student body, 452 out of 1044, responded to the student
senate poll through their P.o. 's on Wednesday, May 10th.
49% - 222 favored his adion
39% - 114 did not favor his action
6% - 28 felt indifferently
Editors for the CLARION and SPIRE were elected
last week by the Student Senate. Marshall Shelley will
be next year's newspaper editor while Bob Miko will
head up the yearbook.
AI Cooper was also considered for the CLARION
post and Peter Varros also ran for the SPIRE editor­ship.
Shelley presented the names of Fred Ogimachi
and Bruce Hoag to work with him on the CLARION.
He said he wanted to emphasize more columns by
different people on campus expressing opposing
views. "Bethel news would be the top concern, but
students' opinions of national issues would also be
printed," he said.
Miko said he would like to make the 1972-73
SPIRE "resemble" an 1890 photo album. "Super-nos­talgia
will be the main emphasis. Ginger Me~calf will
assist Bob on the yearbook.
Marshall Shelly
vol. xlvii no. 16
Bob Miko
This issue of The Clarion represents the close of
another school year. For me it marks the end of one and a
half years of being the Editor-in-Chief. In those one and a
half years I have many people to thank for making The Bethel
Clarion the success that it is today.
When I first started out I knew very little .... it was
Toni Magnuson who patiently worked under me as copy-edi­tor,
teaching me how to do top-notch work. This year it was the
efforts of Judy Harrington and Marshall Shelley, Copy and
Production-Editors, who patiently endured strange and de­manding
'quirks that I have acquired over the p'ast twenty­five
years of my life. To them lowe a special thanks, for
they are both Freshmen and to make the adjustment to Bethel
College is hard enough without having to adjust to me also.
Reflecting back over my editorship I see many things
that I would change, but on the whole I can say that the dir­ection,
the spirit, of The Bethel Clarion was what I was most
concerned about. This was the area in which I believe that I
was most successful. My goal for the paper was that I felt that
there was a need to express radically - that is, get to the
root of things - the options of a truly Christian way of
viewing reality. Too often we allow the situation to dictate
our response.
To proclaim Jesus as Lord of all creation, and not just a
Sunday deal, was perhaps the hardest thing for me to express.
But I am thankful that God allowed me to see the fruits of
that labour. There were times that I felt like the madman in
Nietzsche's Joyful Wisdom. The madman enters the market
place proclaiming the death of god. He is met with people who
don't hear his words and go on about the business of the mar­ket,
some pausing occasionally to say what a nice day it was.
Here was a man screaming at the top of his lungs-and no one
heard him. He walked away realizing that he had come too
soon.
But then there were times when people came up to me
and said, I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU SAID!!!!! Ah, how I
thank God that He has revealed to others what He has shown
me. To have someone say that Jesus is Lord over everything,
there is no sacred/secular, church /world, full-time/laymen,
soul-winning/social concern, or evangelism/social concern
dualities in the world because then God receives only partial
service, half of his full due ..... Then to watch as they grow in
maturity and understanding of what this means in their
school life, that we aren't here solely for tomorrow, but that
God has CALLED us to be students. It is here where the
struggle to live is felt the most.
My failures are too numerous to mention, but one I
should mention is in the form of an apology. I am sorry that I
did not fuHill my responsibility to you, in that I never took
the time to acquaint myself with the struggles that you were
going through and tried to get you into mine. Consequently,
a lot of my editorials missed the mark.
One final word ... Viet Nam is once again an issue that
two
we as Christians have a responsibility to speak to.We must
speak in terms that are not "other-worldly," for Christ is
not "other-worldly." We are not allowed to stick our heads
in that well known sand and say it doesn't exist. It is really
too bad that we didn't organize a march and teach-in when
the South was invaded by the North. If we were truly against
killing in war we would have. As Christians I believe that
we must protect the South from the imperialist aggressors
from the North who seek to enslave the people. The action
that has been taken by Nixon should be applauded as being
the only way that we can peacefully bring an end to the war.
Instead it is trodden under foot. The damage we have done
is not in the multitudes who have died but. rather in the
furthering of the "anti-gospel" of "popular sovereignty" and
"the right of self-determination" (nationally). This "anti­gospel"
has done more to destroy the Viet Namese than any of
the bombs or bullets. Ask some one from the Third World
if it is so. The secularized religiosity of America kills the
people, they become the walking dead. For the sake of both
the Viet Namese people who seem to be headed for a night
without a dawn, and for the sake of America which faces
this night also, we must work for re-Christianization, in­tegrally
and exclusively, without any synthesis with non­Christian
convictions and world-and-life views. In the present
constellation that is the first contribution needed for world­peace.
For if the Christian man, also in the battle for world­peace,
it must still be said, what Joshua told God's people
when confronting a mighty powerful pagen world: "One man
of you shall chase a thousand." (Joshua 23:10). Perhaps that's
what you are here for ..... .
The new campus
isn't as new
as you think
by Dave Hoehl and Kevin Norberg
Even though this doesn't have anything to do with this
article, READ ON! IMPORTANT TRUTHS WILL BE RE­VEALED.
As you know, an important part of the new campus has
not been included for 1972-'73. (This is not because it has
bad breath.) This important facet of the new campus is the
PERFORMANCE ARTS BUILDING. Due to lack of funds,
this center has been excluded in the plans for next year.
YOU CAN HELP! HERE'S HOW:
Please list three people you can contact who would be
willing to contribute to this all-important, in excludable and
fantastically not-to-be-Ieft-out building! Your cooperation
is imperative in making the new Bethel College complete.
Fill out the form below. Please put "our copy" in P.O. 978
and put "your copy" in your pocket or purse (whichever
applies) THEN GET MOVINGI
Our Copy 1. _______________________________________________________________ _
2. _______________________________________________________________ _
3. _______________________________________________________________ _
Your Copy 1. _______________________________________________________________ _
2. _______________________________________________________________ _
3. __ ,, ____________________________________________________________ _
Concerned students
hold teach.in
on Nixon's new
Viet Nam policy
by G. William. Car/,.son
Instructor in History and Political Science
The. recent decision by President Nixon to mine and
"blockade" the North Vietnamese ports has raised before
the American public once again the problems of the goals
and means of our Indo-China policy. A group of about
50 students and faculty got together Oil Tuesday after­noon
in the middle of campus to explore what means
could be used to express concern about the direclions and
risks of this policy and to try to organize a medium
through which the Bethel community CQuid explore the
issues involved in thia decision.
Too often major histodcal events occur and tiley are
Dot discussed or analyzed within the Bethel community.
Often there is very little l'eactiOfl either positive or neg­ative.
This new policy which President Nixon adval'lced
raises severaJ serious questions which need to be ex­plored.
Firat, why has this policy which bas been around
for a long time ilot been used previously by other Ameri­cart
presidents from Eisenhower to Johnson? Second, does
the policy place in jeopardy Soviet-American relations on
such key issues as nuclear disarmament and limitation
of cold war rhetoric and crises? Th·ird .. is this decision
likely to develop a loealized conflict into one which puts
in direct confrontalion tile Soviet Union, the Peoples
Republic of China and the United Sta.tes? Fourth, how
long must the United Stales gove.rnment support and
maintain a political system in South Vietnam which Is not
clea.rly supported by the popula.ce. ts Vietmunizatioll the
besl. option In pursuing this objective? F'i./th, what prior­ity
should the Vietnam war have in relation to other
international and national problems facing \:.he American
policy makers. Should it binder the solutions to our in­ternal
economic and social problems. Should it place in
jeopardy Soviet-American initiatives in Western Europe
and the SALT talk negotiations.
It is hoped that the teach·in, the letter of concern
and the demonstrations along Snelling Ave. will be boHt
informative and intelligently provocative. We trust that
it will be done with a spirit of concern not only for the
implications of me pOlicy but also for the individuals
wbo live and learn on this campus. It is the duty of aU
American citizens to both question and analyze the
nature of the President's initiatives - to support him
when it is possible and a.¢tively optjose him when one
feels t!l.e Preaident's decisions are likely lo endanger the
interests of the country.
It is the hope of the teach-in tha.t each student will
be able to analyze the significant questions surrounding
Tuesday, May 9, ;nlllTudor Ca rlson and 50 student. met
to explore means of expreulon of disapproval of President
Nixon's recent Viet Nilm polley.
the nature of the President's policy and that after this
has been done to express your disapproval or approval,
dependent on which position you find .most tolex·a.ble.
For those who come to the conclusion that they
oppose the new war efforts one must express this oppo­sition
in a way that both expresses the OPPOsition and
remains consistent with the basis for the opposition. In
a day of reflection and the- period following may each
of you find it part of his obligation to search and seek
out the dil·ection he or she wishes tbis country to go and
how he or she wishes. to achieve these objectives. For me
I would recommend;
1. that Congress vote for immediate cut-off of war
funds.
2. that Congress consciously reorient the priorities
of the present militaristic economic and foreign
policies.
3. that the Anl.erican Governmenl enacl legisla.lion
for im.mediate American withdrawal from the war
and thereby enhance the release of American Prison­ers
of War.
0 •• , 21).000 II II over O"'G- t)ONG
SUit Sujt~ ••• , .. '-lfLOO "'en·, :-;iI .... W",,1 SII;I •. ~J6.SO
C:""hmtr~ T(.prll.1 .ISfI ;,0 Ca.hmon SEJ~n emus .$3.5.00
5w"~lcr" •••.•••• ,!!OOU Ca.hm""~ OyrrCUal5 ••. s.sa.so
• (;I~~c~ .......... ,I l.5() Sh;TI~ I ~lom,,~r~mm~eI). f 3.50
NEW rASH IONS t 1':'