Politically correct people have two problems now: they cannot admit that most of the rioters are black people. And they cannot admit that the mixture of races creates civil wars like a few years ago in Paris and now in London. Enid Blyton and the people of her time knew this, I believe her books are loved because she shows a secure society with little disturbing elements easily handled by Fatty and co. And an important part of a secure society is the dominance in numbers by one race, regardless what race. If people look around they must see similar persons or they get stress, see the studies of Robert Putnam.

The reason for brainwashing the european societies to pc-people of course are the extreme capitalists, as this sort of capitalism only works without borders and without people with national feelings. These capitalists promised a paradise on earth, but now we see the reality. The future will bring a religious society, religion helps integrate people of different races a bit. It will become a world a bit like in the Blyton books regarding the feeling of security, but of course without freedom of speech and without so much freedom for women.

I believe such a state would fail miserably. Like it or not, social cohesion is very closely tied to genetic similarity...and feeling like you are part of a family is what inspires people to do great things, rather than narcissistic hedonism. You need such a philia in order to support a real civilization...regardless of IQ.

some nerdy people might think they feel a sort of brotherhood of IQ-ness. But I believe they are kinda fooling themselves...and empirical data supports that also.

At the end of the day, mother nature has given you your brain to act in the service of your gene replication...and a person who is the same race as you has more of your genes...i.e. is more 'you'...than someone of a different race. You can, of course, try to rebel against this purpose...but it still informs your instinct and your desires....and rebelling too much against your own instinct can lead you to paralysis and nihilism.

1st and foremost we don’t like miscegenation because it means less white people. Especially when black gets with white that means the dominant black traits will appear much more than the recessive white traits in the offspring. This is probably the main reason. I believe nature endowed the white race with certain qualities that can be considered superior to those in other races. The combination of intelligence, desire to explore the great beyond, warrior mentality, and physical beauty/sexual attractiveness is found in the white race on a much greater level than that of other races in my opinion. If white mixes with black all of these things that took nature hundreds of thousands of years to bless us with will be destroyed.
Second I don’t think mixed race people are suited for survival at all. Miscegenated animals are more prone to physical and mental disease, they are incapable of making their own offspring often times and if they do have offspring those offspring have a tough time making offspring. They are also unable to defend themselves in the wild. You would think the offspring of a Lion and a Tiger would be a killing machine but it isn’t and it cannot survive in the wild. Though humans have less genetic variation amongst the different races than say dogs do, I still think we should follow the laws of nature that encourage us to stay with our own for the most part.
there have been laws prohibiting race mixing in 44 out of the 50 US States. Despite the push from the Zionist media to normalize race mixing and encourage it, people still overwhelmingly stay within their own as just 7% of white men and women marry outside of their race. Studies prove that interracial marriage is the most likely predictor of a divorce except for one of the partners having a diagnosed mental illness. Black male white female marriages have an extremely high rate of domestic violence even much higher than that of black male black female.
How does it affect my life? Every single thing that occurs in this world has an affect on my life because of the ripple effect it creates. It may not even affect my life that much now but I don’t want my children living in a society with a bunch of mixed race mongrels that they can’t really trust. I want them to live in a society with people who act like them, think like them, identify with them, and don’t hate them for being white. I want them to live with a lot of strong white people so they are in an environment that is conducive towards passing down my specialized traits and my identity to future generations.

Wanting to "preserve" hapas is silly. Especially in the west. Asians have no claim to the west. They make good citizens for the most part, but they have their own countries which are holding against the Soros-lead globalist onslaught of third world trash designed to take down western civilisation one truck of peace or loss of freedom at a time. Asia and Eastern Europe are the last bulwarks. Western Europe and all the major British colonies are being packed to the gills with large numbers of people who will never assimilate, who bring their anti-western, ant-freedom ideologies and feuds with them - and even those who don't, you can guarantee most are still never going to contribute more than they extort from the increasingly small pool of (mostly white and Asian) taxpayers.
Who a hapa female dates is her own business. She didn't ask to be mixed race. I would prefer it was white or Asian - but if she wants to further complicate her kid's bloodline that's up to her. She's only following what her selfish parents did.

An Australian crossbench senator has invoked the term “the final solution” in an inflammatory speech calling for a plebiscite asking voters whether they want to end all immigration by Muslims and non-English speaking people “from the third world”.

Fraser Anning, formerly of the far-right Pauline Hanson One Nation party, and now a member of the Katter’s Australia party, used his maiden speech in the Senate to call for “a plebiscite to allow the Australian people to decide whether they want wholesale non-English speaking immigrants from the third world, and particularly whether they want any Muslims”.

His comments were widely condemned on Wednesday. Malcolm Turnbull said he condemned “racism” and said Australia was the most successful multicultural society in the world. Cabinet minister Mitch Fifield said the speech was deeply regrettable, telling Nine Network: “I thought we had moved beyond this in the parliament. Australia is a warm and open nation.”

Anning also invoked the white Australia policy, suggesting Australians may want “to return to the predominately European immigration policy of the pre-Whitlam consensus”. The white Australia policy, which restricted non-European immigration, ran from 1901 until it began to be dismantled in the late 1960s.

He said neither the former Labor prime minister Gough Whitlam, nor any subsequent government, had asked Australians what kind of immigration they wanted. “What we do need a plebiscite for is to decide who comes here.”

Anning declared on Tuesday the reasons “for ending all further Muslim immigration are both compelling and self-evident”.

“The record of Muslims who have already come to this country in terms of rates of crime, welfare dependency and terrorism are the worst of any migrant and vastly exceed another immigrant group,” he said.

“The majority of Muslims in Australia of working age do not work and exist on welfare. Muslims in New South Wales and Victoria are three times more likely than other groups to be convicted of crimes.”

“We have black African Muslim gangs terrorising Melbourne, we have Isis-sympathising Muslims trying to go overseas to try and fight for Isis and while all Muslims are not terrorists, certainly all terrorists these days are Muslims.

The oldest settlements and bodies found in North America are from white Europeans and by significant time differences from oldest "Native" remains found. Natives didn't sprout up there - they migrated. The still don't predate Europeans on the continent. By your own logic, all of NA is white territory.
Whites also settled the land. That's why they are called settlers. They build towns, cities, roads, tamed the wilderness and made the continent liveable. They became colonies of Britain, but the people were settlers. Natives didn't even have the wheel or permanent settlements and were constantly killing each other.

Conquest is a part of history. Otherwise no land belongs to anyone. How is Europe european if you ignore conquest? THe native population is gone. America is white, Australia is white. That's like saying south americans don't have any claim to south america. Who does then? The people who used to live there are dead

Agreed, various people have been conquering each other for millennia. Extended periods of occupation and development give rise to various claims. Is Anatolia "rightfully" owned by Persians, Greeks, or Turks? Even citing Pakistan as a good example of a "native" territory is absurd as that area has changed hands many times.

The bottom line is that the Americans, and specifically the US and Canada, are desirable today because of the land Europeans cultivated, cities Europeans raised, and infrastructure Europeans built. It was not an open free for all until well after all this was built.

There is literally nowhere on earth that people didn’t migrate to and conquer before making it their home. Even Britain suffered an Anglo-Saxon invasion. Poland used to be wholly Germanic before the old tribes were usurped by proto-polish migrants. Japan was mostly Ainu at one point. America is no different it’s just newer so people like you shit on the people’s claim to try and act like you support the real peaceful nationalism and pander to leftists. There is no America apart from whites and no conception of one before them.

Also I'd argue North America is a white homeland because when we started exploring it the native population plummeted to such low levels by not having immunity to european disease there's really no way you can claim they 'inhabited' the entire continent. It's just absurd. They were also never very unified and are not unified now.

This is actually a good point. The Mexican government made a really bad move allowing white settlers into their territories. The Whites didn't assimilate into Mexican culture and government and eventually demanded sovereignty. This caused Mexico to lose a huge chunk of her land.
The same will happen to the United States if we allow large numbers of immigrants and especially immigrants further and further away from western european values and genetics.

Ladies and Gents (yes, only two possible), it's self-preservation. Any white persons in position of power, will parrot "diversity is our strength" simply because it puts food on their table, and pays their mortgage. Anything less than towing this line will blackball them from their respective industries. But, what these Whites apparently fail to realize is that it will destroy their children's future in this once great country built by the ingenuity, sweat and tenacity of our European ancestors. If I were these people's child, I'd round-house them to the head.

The ghetto-style music that is popular across America today is demonic. It is shameful what goes on in the slum-lord, section 8, crack-houses in ghettos and depraved housing projects across America. There was a K-mart commercial the other day on TV that showed African-American children on a school bus singing rap songs. It sounded like the ghetto. The ad was for back-to-school supplies. It is a shame that children are encouraged by the corporations to sing that kind of gang-land style, pimp-music that is associated with street gangs, prisons, violence, illegal drugs, pushers and prostitution in every ghetto project across the United States. Rap music is of the Devil. It is saturated with sinful pride, sensuality and a horrible bad attitude toward proper authority. It is worldly in every manner.

Sadly, poverty and crime co-exist. The answer is not more affirmative action in government, forcing companies to hire unqualified workers simply because of their race or gender. The city of San Francisco is required by law to hire at least 20% homosexuals, gays, lesbians and transgendered workers. It's wickedness. Christians don't receive any such special treatment. Truly, we are living in sordid times that are WORSE THAN SODOM AND GOMORRAH!!!

That was an interesting, if depressing, post about the bizarre behaviour of Model-Korean Harvard undergraduate Eldo Kim. Not for the first time — especially as I know many worthy and fully qualified people whom Harvard rejected (not coincidentally white gentile Americans) and a goodly number of cretins (the overwhelming majority not white gentile Americans, despite Harvard’s being in Massachusetts and founded by and for such Americans) upon whom Harvard bestowed the social Golden Ticket of admission — I find a Harvard story illuminates the pathologies of America in the grip of the multicultural Left.
In his post, the commenter Steve mentions what may the biggest single problem about Harvard — along, that is, with its diabolical embrace of every lethal social trend Liberalism can conjure up, and its disproportionate role in shoving them all down the collective throat of unenthusiastic Americans:
…I believe Asians are probably around 25 percent of the Harvard undergrad student body. For male students (more likely to commit this kind of crime) maybe you have another 30 percent Jewish (there tend to be more Jewish males than females at Harvard for whatever reason) and maybe another 15 percent other minority. This leaves less than a third of the male student body who would be non-Jewish white (despite making up a much larger percentage of the general U.S. population).
As Jewish Harvard alumnus Ron Unz demonstrated in his underappreciated article of last year, The Myth of American Meritocracy, the United States has an elite university system that actively despises and excludes ordinary Americans, and does so with extraordinary brazenness — presuming, so far correctly, that white gentile Americans are too cowed to make a fuss about it. In Myth Unz focuses on admissions practices at Harvard, Yale and Princeton (“HYP”), but really concentrates on Harvard. No doubt, as a Harvard alum, of those three moral and intellectual Superfund sites Harvard is the one Unz knows best and where he has the most contacts.
The part of Myth the media briefly noticed was the first half, where Unz addresses discrepancies in admissions of Asians — by which he really means Orientals, which makes this relevant to the case of violence-prone peace activist Eldo Kim. Unz concluded that Asian applicants are held to a higher standard than (some) others, and thus HYP are holding their numbers down lest their campuses be transformed into ivy-garlanded Chinatowns.
The second part the media buried instantly: Unz’s two controversial conclusions. The first is that while Asians may be discriminated against to some extent in HYP — especially H — admissions, they are not discriminated against to anything like the same degree as white gentile Americans, over whom those putatively discriminated-against Asians are still preferred. The second is the radioactive conclusion, one Unz could publicly acknowledge reaching only because he is both Jewish and a Harvard grad: HYP — again, especially H — discriminate outrageously in favor of Jewish applicants, to a degree not remotely explained by superior Jewish scholastic performance (something Unz demonstrates is by now largely a myth anyway, relative to high-achieving white gentile Americans). This Unz attributes primarily to ethnic nepotism, witting or otherwise, on the part of largely Jewish admissions staffs at HYP. Unz is bracingly frank about the extent to which HYP and several other universities in the United States have effectively become Jewish institutions. In that context, Unz makes two further points: (i) Jewish applicants are not disadvantaged by the “need” to reject qualified applicants in order to admit the “appropriate” quotas of blacks and Latin Americans, and therefore (ii) white gentile Americans pay the Affirmative Action tariff in full. Indeed — as Espenshade and Radford noted in their study — traditional American extra-curricular activities (4-H, JROTC, etc.) actively harm one’s chances of admission to HYP and their analogues.
In criticising you for drawing what he thinks is an unwarranted conclusion about Asian criminality based on Kim’s misbehaviour at Harvard (which I don’t think you did), Steve misses the big issue even though it is right there in his comment. From the point of view of ordinary Americans — by whom I mean white gentile ones, who are still overwhelmingly the largest group in the U.S. population and include the descendants of nation’s settlers and founders — the United States’ elite universities, which for better or worse (mostly worse) are primary feeders into the national elite, are enemy territory. They are largely run by and for the benefit of people who often have no or only shallow roots in America, are often viscerally hostile to the traditional America, and exercise their hostility by keeping their schools’ drawbridges firmly up in the face of what one might well call traditional Americans. Those Americans should find that situation intolerable, but most entirely fail to notice it, except to grumble about the obvious discrimination in favor of blacks and Hispanics. Even when someone like Ron Unz — who actually knows the score — tells the truth about it, his article can only see print in a magazine he owns and publishes himself. And, of course, the rest of the media buried what Unz revealed just as soon as they could.
It may be odd that young Harvard Man Kim thinks sending bomb threats is good way to bolster his GPA. But not nearly as odd as that a 377-year-old American (or used to be) college is full of Eldo Kims in the first place.

Yes, but european hispanics + other europeans will still become a minority in 3 decades.
The biggest problem with your argument is that non-whites want revenge. They hate white people and they are jealous of our wealth. If they gain enough power, they will kill us and take our money like they did in zimbabwe and South Africa.

Lmao moving the goalposts, so fucking pathetic. I mean I get it, you feel like you got a bad deal in life and you react by affirming your identity.. its fine man do you. But if you're really gonna sit there and try to call the race that created nearly everything you own "inferior" it kinda paints you as a pathetic bitter insecure tard and basically invalidates what you're trying to do.

Rule Number One for anyone confronting Jewish power should be: Never Agree to a Rule or a Set of Rules that the Jews Try to Get you to Agree To. This was the mistake that Jeremy Corbyn made in trying to fend off the Jews who were scheming against him. In an attempt to appease them, he agreed to adopt the Working Definition of Anti-Semitism Working Definition of What The Goyim Are Allowed to Say. For the foreseeable future, Jews will be using it to take out their critics.

These elite republican pundits need to spend more time with proles. They seem to think that being supplicating will increase the share of the minority vote.

This is exactly backward. Republicans who are unapologetic, tough and practical – while also fair – will get more respect from all but the elite minorities. For example, cracking down on illegal immigration will be more popular with Hispanic voters than open borders. Why people can’t understand that a Texan roofer named Jorge might not be happy about a couple million Central Americans suddenly showing up just confounds me. And as for black voters, you aren’t going to outdemocrat the democrats, so appeal to the types who have their lives together and dislike the BLM punks. They need a reason to vote Republican, and if you just imitate the democrats with racial platitudes there is no reason.

Pandering will get Republicans nowhere. It will have diminishing returns for democrats as well. Now that minorities have more of their own candidates to choose from, why vote for some supplicating white sad sack?

The way forward for Republicans is to be unapologetic Americans. That includes being unapologetic about race, culture, religion, etc. You don’t gain admirers by grovelling. Especially not among your typical working class minorities.

Now the elite minorities are another story. They have assimilated to white elite norms of contempt for non-elite white Americans. Most of them are fully onboard with the new Morgenthau Plan for non-progressive white America. It’s a shame but it is what it is, and there’s probably not much that can be done about it besides clamping down on immigration from Asia and letting the Sarah Jeong’s of this world have it with both barrels.

And speaking of her, that fine lady is now Ross Douthat’ s esteemed colleague. Mr. Douthat, always ready to condemn any hint of something inoffensive and normal such as white solidarity, hasn’t made a peep about Jeong’s racial trash-talking. Her employment at the Times is only going to make him look more like a hypocrite than he already does. I mean, you could make excuses for Charles Blow, but not an ungrateful little snake like her. So every time he gets on his high horse about racism, people are going to know he works for a paper that endorses racial hatred of whites.

Obviously it’s easy for the nonwhites, because they clearly like moving to white countries, neighborhoods, school districts, etc.

I don’t see much evidence of the reverse happening except in tiny numbers (there are more Chinese in my hometown of Seattle than there are white Americans in all of China). And despite the tiny numbers of whites in China, a very vocal contingent of Chinese still throws fits about it.

So no, I don’t think I learned what it’s like to be a nonwhite in white society during my stay in China, because it’s obviously far more comfortable than being white over there. This is why I’m certain that most long-term expats must really like and appreciate China. You’d have to to put up with it for that long, or else you’d have to be getting paid a whole lot of money for living there.

As for the Sinicization issue, I live near Vancouver BC now, and it has definitely Sinicized. So have parts of California. It is not a welcome development to most Anglos when they find their children priced out of their cities and shoved out of the universities they built.

For all of you who are new to Gab, don't worry about the racism. I know it can be a little weird at first, but pretty soon you're going to realize that racism is normal and the only reason you haven't seen it before is because the Jews were censoring it.

What exactly makes you think that? What led you to that?
I came to the alt right specifically to help black and hispanic people. I've worked with non white people all my life and me trying to make them adhere to white standards is not fair to them.

I think our philosophy of peaceful separation is the best strategy for the long term happiness and survival of all races.

Black people shouldn't be held to white standards. They need to live in Africa with their own people and their own unique ways of governing themselves.
Latin people have their areas and need to stay there.

And to answer your question of course I'd shoot an alt right dude raping someone. If it was just a fight and I didn't know the context of course I wouldn't shoot anyone. I'd probably just try to break it up.