Search age:

Search in:

Urgent message from the boss: vote Romney

Robert Frank

Work directive ... employees at several companies have been warned about the consequences of not voting for Mitt Romney. Photo: AP

A flurry of emails from US chief executives telling workers how to vote in the presidential election has raised a troubling question: Can a company legally tell workers how to vote?

For the most part, the answer is yes.

This is in no way an attempt to 'intimidate' employees.

Election regulators and corporate lawyers say no federal election law specifically prevents employers from telling workers they could lose their jobs if they vote for a certain candidate.

The issue has come into public view after the chief executive of Westgate Resorts, David Siegel, sent an email to his 7000 workers saying that if Barack Obama was elected, "I will have no choice but to reduce the size of this company."

Advertisement

The news was followed with a missive from the brothers Charles and David Koch to their 45,000 workers at Georgia Pacific that they could "suffer the consequences, including higher gasoline prices, runaway inflation, and other ills" if they voted for candidates not supported by Koch-owned companies or its political fund-raising arm.

The "approved" list of candidates began with Mitt Romney and didn't include any Democrats.

The chief executive of ASG Sofware, Arthur Allen, also sent employees an email saying, "If the US re-elects President Obama, our chances of staying independent are slim to none . . . I don't want to hear any complaints regarding the fallout that will most likely come."

Mr Siegel said he was educating, not threatening, his workers. The Koch brothers said the information sent to workers was "purely intended to be considered among all the other information employees may be reading or receiving as an informed voter. We make it clear that any decision about which candidates to support belongs solely to our employees based on the factors that are most important to them, and this is in no way an attempt to 'intimidate' employees. Any such claim to the contrary is completely untrue."

Legal experts say there is no law that expressly forbids company executives from giving their political views or even threatening lay-offs if a certain candidate is elected.

A spokesperson for the Federal Elections Commission said there were laws that restricted employers from inducing employees to give money or raise funds for a certain candidate. But there are no federal election laws relating to voting recommendations or even implied threats.

"There is no specific federal law for this kind of communication, as far as I know" said Stacey Mark, an employment lawyer who mostly represents companies.

She said some states had laws forbidding coercion or voting pressure. Oregon has a law preventing employers from using "undue influence" to "vote in a particular manner". It's unclear whether Florida or Georgia have similar laws.

Ms Mark said that there should be federal legislation that prevented employers from telling workers how to vote.

"I don't think employers should have that kind of power over their employees," she said. "People are required to do a lot of things in an appropriate work environment. Employers can restrict speech, people have biases they are restricted from bring to work, and that's not unreasonable. But voting is personal and I don't think employers should be able to affect that."