httpd-docs mailing list archives

--On Friday, March 07, 2003 20:38:33 +0200 Michael.Schroepl@telekurs.de
wrote:
> which (and how many) other projects could be candidates
> for a merge of this type? (If many, then would there be
> any benefit in having a deeper structure in this tree?)
Any sub-project under the direction of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> And if there were to be common rules for all subprojects,
> who would enforce that these rules are kept to by all
> participants? Which subproject (if any) would be the one
> to decide how things have to be done?
> (Would "flood" be a "guest" in the "httpd" tree?)
I would imagine we can come to consensus. The PMC is ultimately
responsible for making sure that all sub-projects are aware of the
documentation guidelines.
I suggested to Jacek that flood's documentation should leverage httpd's
documentation structure. It makes it easier to try to standardize on a
common docs infrastructure. If it ends up that we can't come to a
consensus, fine, but I'll be shocked if it comes to that.
I don't personally know whether flood's docs have to be in httpd-docs -
they could, but it may also make sense to split the common bits into a
httpd-docs-tools repository (see site and site-tools). I'm personally
ambivalent on this though. --- justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org