Note: Javascript is disabled or is not supported by your browser. For this reason, some items on this page will be unavailable. For more information about this message, please visit this page: About CDC.gov.

To the Editor: Multidrug resistance in bacteria isolated from animals is an emerging phenomenon, mirroring what is happening among humans. During the past decade, expanded-spectrum β-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae from humans (1) and animals (2) worldwide have been reported. Among humans, as a consequence of this high rate, use of carbepenems is increasing selection pressure; carbapenem-resistant gram-negative organisms are increasingly reported, including carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter spp (3).

The most commonly acquired carbapenemases identified in Acinetobacter spp. correspond to carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D β-lactamases (3). In particular, the worldwide spread of OXA-23–producing A. baumannii is considered a serious threat; those strains are frequently involved in nosocomial outbreaks for which therapeutic options are extremely limited (3,4). Our study objective was to evaluate the possible occurrence of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacteria in dairy cattle in France.

In August 2010, at a dairy farm 30 km from Paris, France, rectal swabs were collected from 50 cows. Samples were precultured in buffered peptone water and incubated for 18 h at 37°C. Cultures were inoculated by streaking 100 μL of the suspensions onto Drigalski agar plates (bioMérieux, Balmes-les-Grottes, France) containing 1 μg/mL of imipenem to select for carbapenem-resistant gram-negative isolates. Of the 50 samples, 9 produced growth on imipenem-containing plates. All colonies tested (10 colonies/sample) by using the API 20 NE (bioMérieux) system were first identified as A. lwoffii. Molecular techniques based on sequencing of the gyrA, gyrB, and rpoB genes (5) enabled more precise identification and indicated that all isolates belonged to the Acinetobacter genomospecies (DNA group) 15TU, which is known to be phylogenetically related to A. lwoffii and which has been reportedly isolated from sewage, freshwater aquaculture habitats, trout intestines, and frozen shrimp (6).

One colony per sample was retained for further investigation (isolates BY1 to BY9). Susceptibility testing and MIC determinations were performed by disk-diffusion assay (Sanofi-Diagnostic Pasteur, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) and Etest (AB bioMérieux, Solna, Sweden) (Table). All isolates except 1 were resistant to penicillins, combinations of penicillins and β-lactamase inhibitors, and carbapenems but susceptible to cefotaxime and of reduced susceptibility to ceftazidime. Isolate BY1 showed higher MICs for carbapenems (Table). In addition, all isolates were resistant to tetracycline, kanamycin, and fosfomycin and remained susceptible to fluoroquinolones, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, amikacin, tobramycin, and sulfonamides. Susceptibility profiles of 3 Acinetobacter genomospecies 15TU reference strains showed that they were fully susceptible to penicillins, carbapenems, tetracycline, and kanamycin.

Clonal diversity between the isolates was assessed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (5), which showed 6 distinct genotypes. Isolate BY1 corresponded to a single clone (data not shown), which indicated that the occurrence of Acinetobacter genomospecies 15TU strains among these animals was not the result of dissemination of a single clone.

PCR detection and sequencing of genes that encode carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D β-lactamases (5) showed that the 9 Acinetobacter genomospecies 15TU isolates harbored a blaOXA-23 gene, whereas the 3 reference strains remained negative. Sequencing confirmed that all isolates expressed β-lactamase OXA-23, which is known to be widespread in A. baumannii.

Mating-out assays and plasmid electroporation assays were performed by using blaOXA-23–positive Acinetobacter spp. isolates as donors and rifampin-resistant A. baumannii BM4547 isolates as a recipient strain (5); however, these assays were unsuccessful. Plasmid DNA analysis (5) gave uninterpretable results, with DNA degradations.

The genetic structures surrounding the blaOXA-23 gene were investigated by PCR mapping (7), which identified transposon Tn2008 in isolate BY2 only. Tn2008 is a major vehicle for the spread of the blaOXA-23 gene in A. baumannii in the People’s Republic of China (8) and the United States (9). In the other isolates, the ISAba1 element of Tn2008 had been truncated by a novel insertion sequence termed ISAcsp2 (www-is.biotoul.fr).

The dairy farmer indicated that most animals from which OXA-23 producers had been identified had received antimicrobial drugs in the previous weeks. Although 1 animal had received amoxicillin-clavulanate, most of the others had been given oxytetracycline and neomycin to treat mastitis.

β-lactamase OXA-23 is a common source of carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii (5). Infections with multidrug-resistant OXA-23–producing A. baumannii or A. junii have been reported from hospitals but not from the community. Our study showed that OXA-23–producers in particular, and carbapenemase producers in general, may be isolated from animals. Among the hypotheses that could explain the selection of this carbapenemase, use of penicillins or penicillin–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations could create selective pressure for β-lactamases because OXA-23 does confer, in addition to decreased susceptibility to carbapenems, a high level of resistance to those compounds. We have previously shown that A. radioresistens, an environmental species, was the progenitor of the blaOXA-23 gene (10). Studies are needed to determine to what extent and at which locations Acinetobacter genomospecies 15TU and A. radioresistens might co-reside and therefore where the blaOXA-23 gene exchange might have occurred.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially funded by a grant from the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) (U914), the Ministère de l’Education Nationale et de la Recherche (UPRES-EA3539), Université Paris XI, and mostly by grants from the European Community (TROCAR, HEALTH-F3-2008-223031 and TEMPOtest-QC, HEALTH-2009-241742) and from INSERM (U914). L.P. was funded by a grant-in-aid from the École Nationale Vétérinaire de Maisons-Alfort through an INSERM–École Nationale Vétérinaire de Maisons-Alfort contract.

The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.