I am America's Senior Comedian (R).

Feed Me!

These photos are of His Benevolence, Christopher King, Supreme Ruler of 3-Space. They are suitable for framing and display in public buildings, over your desk, on coins, etc.

The stage photos, the rubble series, the beer series, and the holding-eyeglasses series are courtesy of Gregg Matthews, Orlando. All others by Chris King.

Clicking the thumbnail will show a 300dpi version.

Generally, the staged photos were taken in the olden days, around 2004. I have not aged at all, so you may regard these to be an accurate representation of what my big fat pot belly does not look like.

When the Government Man decides to stab his fat, dirty fingers at things and initiate non-linearity, you may use these in your newspaper or on your TV show if you like.

November 2009

11/30/2009

we can see that there may be some villager who may take exception to the behavior of that government. He may decide to stand up and rebuke it and publicly lay the groundwork for a replacement government, one that performs its original mandate.

But the criminals who had planned the mass murder also had a little something to prevent just such an occurrence: They had passed laws saying that there was a new class of tribunal, with reduced evidentiary requirements. This tribunal could make terriss go away. And if anyone stood up at the campfire and starting making noise, they could just declare him a terriss and get rid of him.

So he got the bright idea that he would couch it all in a joke. He's a kookie man. And maybe he's got a tear-jerking backstory. And like all good comedians, he is possessed of a disability, either real or feigned.

And by the time everyone realizes that he's not as disabled or kookie as he makes out to be, it's too late. He's spread the thought.

Former DNC Chair Howard Dean urged progressives on Sunday to have
patience with President Barack Obama, predicting that the White House
would pass comprehensive health care legislation and touting stimulus
package successes.

The former Vermont Governor, a respected progressive voice himself,
told Fox News Sunday that he thought Obama was "going to do fine" and
would "get re-elected" in 2012.

GOP lawmaker: Obama most threatened president ever

President
Barack Obama is "probably the most threatened president ever," says the
ranking Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee.

Rep. Pete King (R-NY) told NBC's Matt Lauer that he supported the
idea that Tareq and Michaele Salahi -- the socialite couple who
gate-crashed a White House state dinner last week -- should be
prosecuted as a "deterrent" to others who might want to try something
similar.

"We can't show this type of weakness to terrorists, or to
psychopaths, especially with President Obama, who is probably the most
threatened president in our history," King said.

People sometimes have a hard time properly conceptualizing what a government is. It's not just some thing that forever and ever commands respect and obedience. It is a mental structure, a communal idea, that, one, commands guys with guns and, two, causes the populace to obey the former.

Imagine it this way: You've got an island with a hundred people on it. They all live together in a village. There are some thieves and murderers among them. Sometimes when people go to sleep, thieves steal into their huts and take their property. This is easy to do, since no one can stay awake all day long.

So the people enter into a pact to provide for the common defense. They all want someone to watch their back while they're asleep. Everyone would want this. We cannot conceive of a single person who would not want assistance in protecting his person and property, so we may assume that every last of these supposititious, original members of this social compact would agree to a government erected for the purpose of providing for the common defense.

Providing for the common defense is the one and only legitimate function of government. This is so because we cannot conceive of every last person agreeing to a government that includes in its mandate the providing of bus lines and pensioners' programs --there could be persons who would find themselves on the losing end of that bargain, as their property would be appropriated for a purpose that is perhaps not to their liking.

Consequently, providing for the common defense is the only legitimate function of government --because that is the only function to which we can conceive of every last of these supposititious, original persons agreeing --again, because we cannot conceive of a single person who would not want assistance defending his person and property.

So the government on this island works well for a time. But as happens with every society, the government agents become full of themselves. And they start expanding their mandate: they start erecting bus lines and pensioners' programs. And even though this is outside the original mandate of that government, you don't throw the baby out with the bathwater; the members of that body politic are willing to tolerate a little institutional creep as long as that government is still performing its original mandate to provide for the common defense and to guarantee the rule of law.

But eventually, the government doesn't even perform its original mandate. Those government agents arrogate to themselves the right to spirit people off to nowhere to be tortured, never to be heard from again. And they arrogate to themselves the right to eavesdrop on the citizens' communications, all of which is completely outside the scope of the original government's powers. At this point, the government starts to lose legitimacy. It is moving away from its original mandate and it is concerning itself chiefly as acting as an instrument of coercion, for the purpose of benefiting some at the expense of others.

And one day, the government hatches the idea to stage a mass murder. Certain criminals in the government get the bright idea that the populace will never go along with some proposed expansion of government power unless that populace thinks that the expansion is necessary to provide for the common defense. They hatch a self-inflicted wound. Every last government in the history of the world has employed this tactic. It is as natural as sunshine that this would happen.

But when the people discover that the mass murder was executed by agents of that government, the existence of that government is no longer a matter of personal preference about whether we should have bus lines or pensioners' programs; it's that the government has caused itself to cease to exist. Governments, by definition, do not calculate the murder of the citizenry. At this time, the government does not even exist in theory. At this point, the government has evaporated. All that is left of that government are the former agents who have not yet gotten the memo, and the coconuts that the agents use for the purpose of throwing at fleeing criminals and the jute vines that are used by agents to bind the hands of those criminals.

The jute vines and the coconuts and the agents still exist, but the government does not. Governments are thought structures. They are created by thoughts and they are destroyed by thoughts.

At this time, a person who was once an agent of that government loses any legitimacy once conferred by working for a government. At this time, an agent becomes just some regular person walking around with coconuts and jute vines, swaggering along through the village, barking orders.

At this time, it is morally proper that the people erect a new government to fulfill the one and only legitimate mandate of lawful government, which is to provide for the common defense --one function of which nascent government will be to inform the persons walking around with jute vines and coconuts that they no longer operate with any authority and that they had better drop the jute vines and the coconuts. It is morally proper at this time that the new government disarm those persons of their weapons, lest they cause any harm to the populace --especially since those persons somehow consider it okay to kick in doors and eavesdrop on communications and torture people.

What you are witnessing now is a president who honestly doesn't understand that his jurisdiction doesn't exist. He shows up to work every day and bangs his gavel and gets carried around the island in a bamboo chair and he barks orders.

...But everyone's moved on. No one even notices him. And if he keeps it up with his preening and his grand pronouncements, eventually those islanders take a blackjack to his face so that he finally gets the picture.

You are witnessing the complete ignoring of, and the complete disrespecting of, a dead-ender on that island, a dead-ender who --quite embarrassingly enough-- truly, honestly believes that his jurisdiction exists.

You are privileged to live in the present day, because you are witnessing the passing of the old and the birth of the new. So it's no wonder that the man commands no respect --he's just some guy sitting in the vacated office of a jurisdiction that doesn't exist.

By the way, if you want to find a bunch of yesterday's-news, bust-a-gut Holofraud pictures of people moaning and getting fried, you can just search Google like I do for "holocaust," large image size.

I just laugh my ass off at how I am completely getting away with ridiculing the piss out of the Holofraud. (What are you going to do now? Go into watchmaking? What shall be your chief national export if not tales of woe? Yeah, I'd say your national identity is destroyed now; you got no animating principle left.)

By now, even your smart-as-a-whip mind has figured out that Granma got fried on orders of the same Illuminati, eugenicist bankers who are attempting to erect a global government through the Copenhagen climate treaty. What do you think Holdren's around for? And why do you think he's implicated in Climategate? That's his precious little global government, the one he pines for in his book, Ecoscience. And if that monster of a government gets up on its legs, your people will have ain't seen nothin' yet.

Do you know what comes after global, Illuminati government? The Burntest Offering!They finish lopping off that diseased limb! And that's where I come in: I know who these people are and I know how to defeat them.

This is how we transition me to TV: I'll work under a new stage name, and not a single person in my audience will breathe a word of my former identity. And all that material performed under Chris King Pop Icon and Christopher King stays under wraps. ...during which time I can do my work and dismantle this tyranny.

And not a single adversary will raise a complaint about my working on TV because they'll know that we can pull that pin at any time and blow the entire system apart --the one they benefit from.

Get it? It works.

Put me on TV, pay me what you will if anything, and I work under another stage name. And don't worry about the Government Man. Let me worry about him.

Do you know why I never bothered extending a gambit to you? It's because you're not relevant. George Bush, I had to worry about. Mukasey, I had to worry about. You? I don't have to worry about you. You're some nobody from Chicago who's tryin' to play with the big boys. What a flameout you turned out to be.

And do you know why you do not engage me? It's because you know I'll blow this entire system apart, and that you'll be square in the blast. You will not survive. And you know that.

So I'm going to make you a deal. We can do this the easy way or the hard way. I get to my destination one way or another. The only question is, how much will you inconvenience me? How many cold showers do I have to take? How much are you going to piss me off?

You know ...deep inside you heart... that I will one day have enough guys with guns to restore law to this land. I got a lotta peeps now, and it's only going to get better for me. And when I've got those guys with guns, I'm going to come after you. And I am going to see you prosecuted for any number of felonies, including war crimes.

But here's the deal: If you stop inconveniencing me, you get off scot free. No prosecutions from me. You have my word on that --just like The Abortion has my word that things stay quiet as long as things stay quiet. (And that is why, three years ago, I had "to mean what I say." I knew then that I would be in the position today to cut deals. One's word has to be worth something, unlike yours.)

You, mister, are way, way out of your league. You have no idea what's happening here, do you?

So to recap: If you do not immediately remove any legal stink from me, I, one, will embarrass the ever lovin' piss out of you, AND I will see you prosecuted for various felonies. You have my word on that.

If I receive a phone call at the gas station from a news media person during the hours of 3pm to 8pm, Monday through Friday, by the target date of December 11, then I will know that all legal obstacles have been removed from my path. (Which should not be there anyway since I am the only lawman in this room.)

If I do not receive a call from a news media person by that date, I will do the material.

You have to be a denier. See, if you're not a denier, then there is the danger that you might walk up and throw the corner of the rug back and find no data.

...'Cause you might discover that Mrs. Yang is a lying little science fair fraud. Can you imagine Mrs. Yang yelling "denier!" at those who may demand to see her data?

I am reminded of my girlfriend. Didn't I tell you about her? Yeah, I parade her around at every opportunity, and when someone asks me if I saw the Jets game last night, I say, "Yup. Saw it with my girlfriend." Or if they say, "Sure is hot today," I reply, "It sure is. As a matter of fact, I'm going swimming with my girlfriend later." I try to shoehorn mention of my girlfriend into every possible conversation. And then on the way home to see my girlfriend, I'll stop by the gas station and hang around longer than a customer really should, and gently inquire of myself if I might suck my own cock later, even though I'll pretend not to know my name in public. Ain't it great? Come visit Bellows Falls where all the fags have girlfriends and big, shiny trucks!

But anyway, I have a girlfriend. Her name is Jelly. She's an imaginary girlfriend, get it? We go out in public all the time and hang all over each other so that everyone knows she's my girlfriend. ('Cause fags don't have girlfriends, obviously. What are you, stupid?)

And if we're out somewhere and someone questions whether I'm straight, Jelly and I stand up and circle the offender and get in his face and circle 'round and 'round and sing our song:

And it's not even about the actual computer code that contains programmers' remarks about the precise method by which results will be faked.

No, it's much more than that. The original, raw data don't even exist anymore.

There are three threads in particular in the leaked documents which have sent
a shock wave through informed observers across the world. Perhaps the most
obvious, as lucidly put together by Willis Eschenbach (see McIntyre's blog
Climate Audit and Anthony Watt's blog Watts Up With That), is the highly
disturbing series of emails which show how Dr Jones and his colleagues have
for years been discussing the devious tactics whereby they could avoid
releasing their data to outsiders under freedom of information laws.

They have come up with every possible excuse for concealing the background
data on which their findings and temperature records were based.

This in itself has become a major scandal, not least Dr Jones's refusal to
release the basic data from which the CRU derives its hugely influential
temperature record, which culminated last summer in his startling claim that
much of the data from all over the world had simply got "lost".
Most incriminating of all are the emails in which scientists are advised to
delete large chunks of data, which, when this is done after receipt of a
freedom of information request, is a criminal offence.

I don't begrudge anyone arguing in favor of this or that, based upon some assumption.

But there is no assumption here. There are no data.

It's not that the data are fake. It's not that people wrote emails about faking that data. It's that there. are no. data.

It's not that there can be disagreement about what to do about climate change. It's that there is no rational reason to believe that climate change is even occurring.

There are no data. It's total vaporware.

Considering what the stakes were --the erection of a global government at Copenhagen by way of Constitution-overriding treaty for the "purpose" of saving the world, resulting in the complete dismantling of the American government and way of life-- this is a scam unseen in the history of mankind.

These people need to go to prison for colluding to defraud the entire world and delivering humanity's freedom to their banker masters, the ones who financed this whole con job --the one that was such a waste of money that the data don't even exist.

Can I please not hear another cockamamie word out of the Death Land Chronicle and the Washington Post about global warming? 'Cause you know there's no data, right?

Try as the performer might, he will always have a few amateurs in his audience who think that comedy is cuckas and tit jokes. They can't conceive of what professional comedy is. It's very scientific, actually, and proceeds along a particular path. Properly done, the arc is sketched out years in advance, with the end being that everyone is returned safely to the loading platform.

So please don't fall down and burst into tears that Chris hates you. He would embrace you warmly as a friend. No one's ever even met the guy.

If you cock your head and think about it, maybe you can see that Chris is taking your most prized, most lovingly and most ostentatiously displayed possession and openly wiping his ass with it. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. So when Mossad involves itself in 9-11, and when that skeeve Michael Chertoff equates 9-11 "denial" with Holocaust "denial," Chris will ridicule each and every last of your 6.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 million dead and laugh, and laugh, and laugh at your loser backstory that passes for an existence.

The Swiss impress the world with their watches, the Japanese wow us with their robots, but the Jews' national export is, well, tear-jerking sob stories of existential woe and eternal persecution about how everyone just hates them!

The poor dears... Cut them some slack if their intelligence agencies decide to play a little non-cooperative game. It's only because everyone's an Amalekite.

So until Chris sees a full-page ad in the New York Times apologizing for Israeli intelligence's involvement in 9-11, Chris is going to get his pound of, uh, FLESH!!!!

Watch out! He's gonna gitcha!!!!

About the Holocaust thing? No one actually gives a shit. During the twentieth century, governments worldwide killed some one- to two hundred million innocent people by various methods: shootings, starvings, whatever. Even if we believe your massaged numbers of 6 mill, it's just a drop in the bucket. It's a footnote.

Your Holocaust is a fraud. You lost nowhere near 6 million and you know it. You are thieves of sympathy and goodwill. You're like that guy who comes into the gas station who never has a thing to talk about other than what new medical ailment he's got: It's his foot, or his knee now, or how he had to have an MRI.

11/28/2009

They're from Pilots for 911 Truth. (The guys who might know what they're talking about.)

The first video shows that the reported 500 knot sea-level airspeed of Flight 175 was nigh impossible, if not perfectly theoretically impossible.

The second video has a few radio interviews with professionals pilots, including one who captained Flight 175 itself. He indicates that there is no way anyone flew a 767 into such a small target at five hundred knots.

We already know that what struck the South Tower was not Flight 175, due to the JT9D-7 series engine on Murray Street. But a watching of these videos will confirm on an emotional level what we already knew on a technical level. When professional pilots with tens of thousands of hours of airtime on the class of aircraft in question say, "Oh yeah, that didn't happen," and when you've got a 747 engine on Murray Street, then you really know it didn't happen.

And since we've got an E-4B Command and Control aircraft just leaning up against a lamppost and cleaning its nails and whistling as planes happen to fly into the Twin Towers, I know that that E-4B piloted those drones in. So just for fun, just so that we can put our case together, it would be useful to research that Cooling Duct Assembly and see what military engines that assembly was used on. The goal is to pin it down to a particular aircraft, if possible. Whatever it was, it would have to be reinforced to withstand the pressure of sea-level air density at 500 knots.

I make some very powerful people very, very scared. Or, more precisely, the information contained in my show makes those people scared.

Within my theater --that is, inside my show, within this venue called my "theater"-- the United States government does not exist. Political structures are informational structures. They are destroyed with information. Down to a single audience member, it is recognized that I have destroyed the United States government. The same principles which destroyed the United States also destroyed the several states, owing to those jurisdictions' close alignment with United States. Unlawfulness destroys all jurisdictions through which it may pass. The information contained here possesses the power to completely destroy the entire American political system. All I have to do is to enlarge my theater to encompass the wider public and then accept others into USov.

Our adversaries are most frightened of any enlarging of my theater. As a result, they will not touch me for fear of doing that. That is why I can't get off the terror watch list. (Funny, isn't it, when the law abiding are declared criminals.)

I may do as I please, in perfect confidence that our adversaries will not enlarge this theater. I may walk around my audience, arrest certain persons, flip them and turn them into informants, and try others with no fear whatsoever that the theater will be enlarged. I assure you that we may restore law to this land without any civilian interference. To interfere in the restoration of lawful government is a crime. And I assure you that the so-called news media will not breathe a single word of our actions, lest this theater suddenly expand and engulf the political system to which they owe their fortunes.

Our adversaries fear uncertainty. They fear chaos which is not of their own making. They understand the nature of non-linear systems. They will do nothing to encourage a small input's growing into a large, uncontrollable output. They will ignore us until it is too late. And even if they decide to act at some point, the theater immediately expands and swallows the entire corrupt system whole. We win either way. The only question is, how many of our adversary's lieutenants escape unscathed? Some? Or none?

Our adversaries employ a gaming strategy that depends upon deception and secrecy. They will never, ever step into the light to engage us. That is their weakness. We will exploit it.

I want you to get some Navy lawyers working on a tribunal system for the prosecution of 9-11 crimes. That tribunal does not derive its authority from any other jurisdiction, nor is it bound by their rules. Any person who obstructs the operation of this tribunal is subject to prosecution. I assure you that not a single person will utter a peep in protest. "We're prosecuting those who were involved in 9-11. That's a good thing, right? What, are you involved somehow? Is that why you're opposed to a 9-11 tribunal?" We start at the bottom and just unzip the whole thing. (Though sniff out the guys at the top beforehand and see that they don't cause any trouble.)

You will find great purchase with Michael Chertoff and Larry Silverstein. I suggest that you make them your first targets. Their banker friends will attempt to intervene. Be prepared to arrest those banks' principals and seize their assets.

There are no rules. Why? Because those with the guns make the rules. It is a very dangerous conceit indeed that a banker come to believe that he makes the rules. No, all he does is pay the people who make the rules. Woe unto him when those with the guns simply take what is his and put it to a higher moral use. If law is to be defined anew, then let decent men define it. We occupy a no man's land. Let us claim it.

My attitude toward Israel is as it has always been: Things stay quiet as long as things stay quiet. But if a single device goes off in the United States, Israel disappears immediately --and, as I have already stated, every American Jew loses all title to property. Ownership has meaning only as long as the ruling sovereign recognizes title. Without title recognized in a court, how can someone own something? It makes no legal sense.

Have you spoken with your generals yet? Have they finally tired of living on their knees?

The CIA and NSA disappear. Figure out a way to make it happen. I suggest plans to cripple their communications and to padlock their doors. You know what I mean. I want its employees furloughed until key officers can be identified and removed. Start looking for their replacements. I suggest tapping people in SecGru. Point is, I want those eyes and ears shut down until they serve us.

Be prepared to terminate the broadcasts of the various "news" outlets. If they cause a problem, we simply turn them off. We have that ability.

This all proceeds in the plain light of day, but yet it will remain under the radar. Our adversaries will whistle a happy tune and pretend that nothing untoward is happening. That is the weakness in their strategy.

Should they miscalculate and decide to engage us, we simply pull the pin ourselves. If we need to enlarge this theater, initiate non-linearity, and swallow the entire system at once, you will crack the seal and publicize the following term: "Capta Brightstick". Heretofore, that combination of words has not existed in the infosphere.

The publication of that term will draw everyone right here, this theater will immediately enlarge, and the entire system gets swallowed whole. Point is, our adversaries will permit us to restore law at our leisure, or they can all go down together, all at once.

And figure out a way to tickle Mister Obama to inform him of who makes the rules now.

.

I need some looking after and a little TLC. It is taxing to work in complete solitude. And I could use some bifocals. I would very much appreciate it if I could come into the fold. What if you reactivate me? It may confer legitimacy and some measure of protection. If you can do that, then consider it requested.

11/27/2009

At this time, all professional comedians and comedy writers will leave. You may not appropriate my intellectual property and put it to your own commercial use.

To some degree, the comedian is the "clearer of the field." His job is to clear landmines so that topics may be discussed in the public square. There are many in this world who do not want topics discussed. They will lay mines near verboten issues.

If the comedian determines that linguistic warfare is underway, he will clear the field of all mines. He will detonate them. He'd better have a thick skin.

Once the comedian determines that the word 'denier' is being applied to legitimate issues, he will terminate that linguistic warfare term's usefulness once and for all.

He will wipe his ass with the Holocaust and laugh all the way to the next contest.

And then, obviously, discussing climate change can't be as bad as what that guy does, what with his Holocaust denial, right?

This method I call Clearing Landmines. It is akin to Stretching the Sweater Sleeve All the Way Out.

Ten students at a Naples, Florida, middle school have been given
one-day, in-school suspensions for participating in "Kick a Jew Day,"
in which Jewish students were targeted for assault, according to news
reports in the local media.

Parents and students at North Naples Middle School told NBC channel 2 in Naples that many students -- all of them Jewish -- were targeted in the attacks, which took place last week.

This is my appreciation of the Jewish community: American Jews are part of a larger nation that is guided by a steering committee of organized criminals. They're ruthless and you don't cross them. (Unless they cross you first by involving themselves in 9-11, in which case you are free to say what you will. And if they don't like it, they can fall right down and give a shriek and cry, which is the Jewish shtick. Unbecoming behavior for what is ostensibly a contingent of organized criminals, I know, but whatever. It's not like they're Italian. They do what they can.)

For the most part, American Jews do not question the decisions of this steering committee. This committee, after all, has managed to convince Jews that everyone hates them. And to drill this point home, they'll have their Mossad agents spray-paint swastikas in Brooklyn Heights and spread leaflets saying that we should "kill all the Jews."

American Jews have been captured by this organized crime contingent among them. American Jews are slaves, plain and simple.

Who is the new butt of jokes now? Is it Polacks? Blacks? Puerto Ricans? No. It's Jews. They're the laughingstock of humanity now. And they did it all by themselves by allowing that organized crime contingent among them to involve the whole of Jewry in 9-11 --'cause it's all for one and one for all, right? Gotta stick together? Everyone's out to get 'em; Amalek's gonna spring right out of the linen closet.

Kooks.

9-11 was an extremely bad thing for Jews --again, not that I mean to lay the blame there; I am focusing on Jewish organized crime right now as a convenient entry point into a larger cartel of organized criminals. But 9-11 was bad for Jews because it delivered on a silver platter permission to snatch that clacking, belching mess of a religion, pop the hood, and get a good look at it.

And what I'm seeing inside that illness are some very unsavory notions that are held by some among their nation: such as Jews being superior to non-human Gentiles, that Gentiles are to lick the feet of Jews, and that Jews consider the property of a Gentile to be their own.

Oh really?

Of all the religions to which I have given a cursory study, there is only one that made me sick to my stomach and actually made me want to vomit.

I understand these beliefs to be particular to the Orthodox variant. But it's still comedy gold.

I can see the future, and what the future holds is this: See, people don't like to be had. No one likes to be tricked. No one likes to be played or to have their goodwill exploited. So people are going to look at Israeli involvement in 9-11 and read the tripe about Gentiles being subhuman, and they're going to contrast that with the full-page ads of people dancing on the beach at sunset, and the statues of one of the downtrodden moaning and groaning about how everyone hates them.

...And they're going to be kicking Jews. And throwing their yarmulkes into trees. And going "Boo!" and watching the Jew give a frightened little shriek and fall down and start crying.

...and much, much worse.

So you are going to want to get out in front of this. You will want to publicly pin the blame exactly where it belongs, with that error called Israel.

Will you do this? Of course not. No one ever takes my advice.

But my conscience is now clear. I have fulfilled my moral obligation to inform you of what I see coming down the pike. Make a course correction as you speed toward that bridge abutment or not; I don't care.

“The data, real data, over the last one thousand, ten thousand or
million years, shows there is no relationship between carbon dioxide
and world temperatures or climate extremes. Now we can see that
actually the people in charge of data have been fiddling it, and they
have been hiding the real decline in world temperatures in an attempt
to keep their so called moral high ground,” Corbyn told host Bill Dod
and Aleksey Kokorin, the Climate Program Coordinator for WWF in Russia.

...

“Carbon dioxide levels are driven by temps, not the other way around.
There have been big peaks in CO2 in past…carbon dioxide is actually a
good thing for the world,” Corbyn explained. “More CO2 makes plants and
animals more efficient,” he added.

The debate is over. (Not the science part. Science is never settled. The part that's over is that the data have been faked.)

Do you remember Mrs. Yang? She was that kid's secondary love interest in Rushmore. She had a high school science fair project and she had all sorts of scholarships and corporate deals lined up for her discovery. Turns out, though, that she had faked the whole thing. She just made up the data.

So let's try to distill this complex global warming debate down: The data were fake. The computer models --the ones that display the doom-and-gloom graphs to the gasps of the audience-- were rigged. Carbon dioxide plays no role in global temperature --as temperature goes up, carbon dioxide goes up. Carbon dioxide probably plays a role in the global correction mechanism: As solar output goes up --and solar output does change; don't you think this might have an effect on planetary temperature?-- as solar output goes up, the planet heats up. As the planet heats up, carbon dioxide is unlocked from wherever it is, whether it be the crust or the oceans. With more carbon dioxide, plant growth is encouraged. Plants exhale water vapor and oxygen. This water vapor forms fluffy white clouds which reflect solar radiation.

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's pledge of a provisional
target for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in the United States,
the first time in more than a decade that a U.S. administration has
offered even a tentative promise to reduce production of
climate-altering gases, may not be enough to drive an agreement at the
climate conference in Copenhagen.

Obama will tell the delegates that the United States intends to reduce
its greenhouse gas emissions "in the range of" 17 percent below 2005
levels by 2020 and 83 percent by 2050, officials said.

Why is it full speed ahead since the carbon cap will be positively disastrous for American industry and since we know that carbon has nothing to do with anything? "Chris, you must be wrong. This doesn't make sense. The government is the experts, so if you're right, why would the government go full speed ahead if carbon doesn't affect anything?"

Because it's a scam.

If Condoleezza Rice had already identified the 9-11 hijackers as early as 9-11, don't you think their crack investigative skills might have told them that the engine on Murray Street was a 747 engine? But yet they went full speed ahead with their disastrous wars on everyone and everything. Is it because they're incompetent? No, it's because 9-11 was just the pretext that permitted their course of action.

Carbon is just the pretext. It permits a course of action, and that is a global tax on everyone and everything, payable to Goldman Sachs. It's a scam, just like 9-11 was a scam.

You can bet your ass that the Government Man will whistle a happy tune and shield his eyes and plug his fingers in his ears and go, "La la la la la la la! I can't hear you!" as he commits to carbon reductions and forks over American industry to his banker masters at Copenhagen. And the American "news" media will studiously avoid discussing the topic, much like they simply refuse to cover that unfortunate engine on Murray Street, the one that not only annihilated the United States government, but also annihilated the American journalism industry.

I have taken the liberty of redesigning the Pulitzer Prize. It is a replica of that Murray Street engine atop a hand-rubbed teak base, suitable for proud display on your mantle:

When governments ignore contradictory information that would derail their plans, it's because there is a pretext that needs defending.

I absolutely guarantee you that the Obama Administration and the American "news" media will act like they never even heard of any dispute among those contentious, nitpicking scientists.

The carbon debate is over. The carbon tax is dead. It's a good old-fashioned con job.

This is the first in a new segment of the show. I present to my adoring audience my handpicked selections of full episodes of interesting films or TV shows that I find on Google or YouTube. I will have watched every selection I present to you and certify it as a "good watch."

Here is the first, Time Travel Experiments. It's about this physicist who has built a working time machine, within which subatomic particles may be sent into the past. The video covers the theoretical underpinnings of the concept and describes how his machine operates.

Photons and electrons are examples of subatomic particles. Since this very message you are reading or the video you are about to see are made of electrons, you can see that the Future People might be able to send messages back in time.

11/26/2009

A former British ambassador to the United States says then-National
Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice talked to him about Iraq and Saddam
Hussein hours after the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon
on Sept. 11, 2001.

...

On September 11, 2001, Rice reportedly told Meyer that "there's no
doubt this was an Al-Qaeda operation [but] we are just looking to see
if there could possibly be any connection with Saddam Hussein."

So Miss Rice knew the very day of 9-11 that it was Al Qaeda, huh? Wow, that's some crack detective work.

I seem to recall that --upon her being asked by a reporter how they so quickly determined the identities of the hijackers and then trotted out full dossiers, complete with photos-- Rice replied that they had gotten the information from Able Danger.

Able Danger was the name of a data mining operating set up within Special Operations Command, located in Tampa.

Mark Zaid, a lawyer for several Able Danger whistleblowers in 2005,
will give this description of Able Danger: “In the most understandable
and simplistic terms, Able Danger involved the searching out and
compiling of open source or other publicly available information
regarding specific targets or tasks that were connected through
associational links. No classified information was used. No government
database systems were used.… The search and compilation efforts were
primarily handled by defense contractors, who did not necessarily know
they were working for Able Danger, and that information was then to be
utilized by the military members of Able Danger for whatever
appropriate purposes.” [US Congress, 9/21/2005]

Able Danger had a pretty good lead on the 9-11 "hijackers." (I put hijackers in quotes because, obviously, if that engine on Murray Street is a 747 engine, then Flight 175 wasn't even present at the scene of the crime, much less could any alleged Flight 175 hijackers have played a role in 9-11.)

The new Able Danger team begins collecting data on al-Qaeda. The aim is
to gain intelligence that will allow Special Operations forces to
conduct strikes against al-Qaeda around the world. Erik Kleinsmith will
later claim that he is visited by Special Operations officials and he
gives them a demonstration of what the data mining techniques they’ve
developed can do. He claims that within 90 minutes, his analysts finds
evidence that al-Qaeda has a “worldwide footprint” including “a
surprising presence in the US. That’s when we started losing sleep.” [National Journal, 12/3/2005]

The Congressional Joint Inquiry will later find that several of the
hijackers, including Mohamed Atta and Marwan Alshehhi, attend mosques
in the US and that at least one of the mosques is in Florida. [US Congress, 7/24/2003, pp. 169 ]
The Florida mosque attended by Atta and Alshehhi may be the Al Hijrah
mosque run by Gulshair Shukrijumah in Miramar, Broward Country,
Florida. Mohamed Atta and several other hijackers live near the mosque
(see April 11, 2001) and train at nearby Opa-Locka airport (see December 29-31, 2000).
After 9/11, the FBI will visit the mosque and ask Shukrijumah and his
wife if they recognize the hijackers and if their son, Adnan, knew Atta
or had mentioned trips to Pakistan and Afghanistan. [Miami New Times, 4/3/2003; Los Angeles Times, 9/3/2006]

Since the hijackers could not have theoretically had anything to do with any Twin Towers' blowing right right up and falling right down, it follows that the "hijackers" were part of the storyboarding operation. Again, there are two components to a compartmentalized self-inflicted wound, a false-flag attack: what I --and perhaps others-- call the "storyboarding operation" and the "event operation." If you're going to go to the trouble of flying planes into the Twin Towers, you will also go to the trouble of spending, yes, years cultivating your patsies and their backstories. Those patsies will get their tickets punched all along the way: They will attend flight school and make loud noises about how they hate America. They will post on websites or whatever about how they hate America. They will parade in front of airport cameras, swinging scimitars and yelling something about Allah. There is always, always, always an FBI handler involved. This is so that if the patsy gets pinched, the handler can intervene and say, "Oh, he's with us. He's an informant. We're tracking, uh, terrorists!" This handler can take the heat off until the event operation unfolds and the patsy's backstory and dossier can be used to identify him as a "hijacker."

The event operation is the nuts and bolts of the whole thing: Flying drones into the Twin Towers, standing down NORAD, the whole thing.

What was the purpose of forming Able Danger in the first place? Was it perfectly benign in its mandate to fight the terriss? Or was it formed within SOCOM (Special Ops) for the purpose of following the patsies and documenting their "ticket punches" all the way through the patsy pipeline? We already know that elements within the Pentagon used an E-4B during Operation Global Guardian on 9-11 to remotely pilot drones into the Twin Towers, so I do not take it on faith that the creation of Able Danger was benign.

But whatever the motive in forming Able Danger, that team assembled quite a large amount of information on the "hijackers."

Was Able Danger benign or not? What argues against its being benign is that Condoleezza Rice relied upon its intelligence very early on for the dossiers on the "hijackers." And I know Condoleezza Rice is crooked. She is involved in the 9-11 crime. She, George Bush, Dick Cheney, Michael Chertoff, and Donald Rumsfeld all had their roles to play in occupying key posts in the government for the purpose of providing the proper governmental "solution" in that problem, reaction, solution equation: Compartments in the Pentagon create the problem by flying drones into the Twin Towers, the "news" media react to the problem by wringing their hands and moaning that someone should do something, and the Bush Administration provides the solution to the problem by immediately declaring that they know the identities of the "hijackers." (They don't possess the investigative skills to identify that engine on Murray Street, but somehow they've got full dossiers on the hijackers mere hours after the event.) And the rest is history: a million dead; nineteen-year-old boys from the Vermont National Guard hoodwinked into guarding opium fields; gas pipelines; Israelis salivating at the prospect of realizing their dream of creating a "Greater Israel."

So because Able Danger's contribution to recording the punching of hijackers' tickets in the storyboarding operation was so fruitful, that argues that the creation of Able Danger was not benign. If I am not mistaken, Condoleezza Rice did base her claim that it was all an Al Qaeda operation on intelligence gotten from Able Danger.

But maybe Able Danger was benign. It got shut down at one point because it was starting to ensnare Americans in the Al Qaeda dragnet, including Condoleezza Rice:

James D. Smith is working for the private company Orion Scientific
Systems on a contract that assists the Able Danger project. Smith will
later claim that around March or April 2000, armed federal agents come
into Orion and confiscate much of the data that Orion had compiled for
Able Danger. Orion’s contract stops at this time and Smith has no
further involvement with Able Danger. However, Smith happens to have
some unclassified charts made for Able Danger in the trunk of his car
when the agents raid his office. The chart with Mohamed Atta’s picture
on it will thus survive and be remembered well by Smith, though it will
be destroyed in the summer of 2004 (see August 22-September 1, 2005).
Smith will later state, “All information that we have ever produced,
which was all unclassified, was confiscated and to this day we don’t
know who by.” [US Congress, 9/21/2005; US Congress, 2/15/2006]

I would like to know more about why this data was confiscated. Why do you confiscate data on the terriss?

Four analysts from the US Army’s Land Information Warfare Activity
(LIWA) unit are forced to stop their work supporting the Able Danger
program. At the same time, private contractors working for Able Danger
are fired. This occurs around the time that it becomes known by some
inside the military that LIWA had identified future National Security
Adviser and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former Defense
Secretary William Perry, and other prominent Americans as potential
security risks (see April 2000).
It was apparently these LIWA analysts (such as Dr. Eileen Preisser) and
contractors (such as James D. Smith) who conducted most of the data
mining and analysis of al-Qaeda in the preceding months. One of the
four LIWA analysts, Maj. Erik Kleinsmith, will later be ordered to
destroy all the data collected (see May-June 2000). LIWA’s support for Able Danger will resume a few months later (see Late September 2000). [New York Post, 8/27/2005; US Congress, 9/21/2005; Washington Times, 9/22/2005]

There is some skulduggery involved with the scuttling of Able Danger. Here are some news reports on Able Danger:

I suspect there is a goldmine of information to be gotten from Able Danger. Now that we know that 9-11 was a self-inflicted wound, a false-flag attack, and since self-inflicted wounds always are comprised both of event operations and storyboarding operations, I suspect that a careful look at Able Danger data will allow us to determine which United States agents played an active role in that storyboarding operation and, thus, the larger 9-11 crime.

I bet you a million dollars that Able Danger data will connect Mohamed Atta, aka Mohamed el Amir, with Michael Chertoff's onetime client, Magdy Elamir. (Not that we didn't know that already.) Magdy and Mohamed are brothers. And I bet you an additional --yes, additional-- one million dollars that Able Danger data will connect Michael Chertoff directly with Mohamed Atta. We already know that Michael Chertoff presided over the curiously lenient disposition of a terrorism case involving the Elamir brothers' financing of Al Qaeda by way of a money-laundering operation. And we already know that Michael Chertoff released swarms of Israeli roaches arrested after 9-11, including the Five High-Fiving and Dancing Israelis, three of whom later admitted on Israeli television that "Our purpose was to document the event." Chertoff released these suspects on the pretext of "visa violations." They're suspects in the greatest crime ever to have occurred on United States soil, but Chertoff is more put out by their visa violations?

Uh huh.

And was Michael Chertoff involved in seizing Orion's Able Danger data? I bet he was...

Whether its creation was benign, Able Danger likely contains very important pieces of the puzzle. But we must go forth in the knowledge that what they picked up, the "chatter" they heard, was part of the storyboarding operation only.

(Don't worry; I have more respect for you than I have for the rabbis. I won't require that you address me as 'King.' Please consider me 'Chris.')

It's taken me seven years to get here, but I have achieved a perfect balance between two states. It is a state of non-specificity. "Is he or isn't he?" Both are perfectly equally plausible.

From that nothingness springs everything. From non-specificity springs specificity.

And a non-specific thing cannot ever be fraudulent. Frauds have no power. Nearly every last thing in this world possesses the weakness of being exposed as a fraud, with the exception of the non-specific.

Is there some Original Non-Specificity from which sprang everything in this universe, some Original Null?

Teach me about Aleph. Does the concept have a gender? Probably not, I suppose. Or maybe both. I want to understand Aleph's influence upon informational systems in particular. Would you teach me by writing some column in some newspaper somewhere? I'll search for it in about a week. I require religious instruction.

If you are reading this, you are morally and legally obligated to buy a ticket to my show, which is the professional undertaking of a professional comedian. Tickets are $100 per person, per year. Click to buy your ticket. If you truly don't have the money, you get in for free; otherwise no exceptions to this rule. Thanks, Chris.