Whether the discoverers of HIV have deluded themselves or it was ordered to them to conceal the tritium contamination?

In nature, tritium almost does not exist. Tritium penetrates DNA, RNA, proteins and other like hydrogen. The likelihood one penetrated atom to “blast” in the course of 12 years is 50%. Depending on that where it has penetrated, the harms to a given organism can be very heavy. Unlike the heavy radioactive isotopes, it is not found easily, and it penetrates without a problem and even an atom/ molecule is enough.It is also possible tritium to activate cancer formations or microorganisms, which is seen in AIDS. Dead DNA and RNA fragments could be prepared (in order the tritium not to get diluted during the division) or viruses with tritium be prepared and they to cause infection with the symptoms of AIDS. Tritium is given off by radioactive materials, atom blasts, nuclear reactors and some other... It is fully possible in California “the gay-infection” with tritium to have started with prisoners who worked in Nevada desert or maybe people serving in the army. Tritium can retain for long in an organism exactly in blood plasma, mucus secret or lymph nodes – viscose liquids which do not convert fast. It is not uncanny that in Ukraine there is a big boom of “infection with HIV” and exactly during the average in Chernobyl, in the socialistic camp the story of the deadly “disease” was spread. “HIV” strategy prevents eventual conception of ill children. “The epidemic” in the RSA also has reasonable explanation. Tritium is not a stable isotope and it turns into helium. Since the bombarding in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, enough years have passed to say that tritium has diminished manifold. It is another question what genetic harms it has left.

There is something much more upsetting. The nuclear blasts may revive the petrol and gas fields. Nuclear blasts can extract petrol and natural gas from embers and carbon minerals. Tritium is the problem. There are blasts at which it is not given off in big quantities. There are technologies which purify it or simply it is waited for it to get transformed, but...

Tritium is not linked to AIDS. No matter how much you want to ignore physics, chemistry and biology. And by reading your post you are willing to ignore a lot about all three. You do not make sense. Yes I know that English is not your primary language, it is painfully obvious and mostly irrelevant, but we would appreciate logic and reason in your texts.And why the suspense?

Patrick

Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)

canalon wrote:HIV and AIDS are linked.HIV is a virus that can be purified....

And if any inoffensive retrovirus contains tritium? We know that retroviruses have a key to penetration in DNA and its surroundings.

So what? If tritium was *really* the key to AIDS, the HIV would not be necessary. H3 can replace hydrogen in every molecule, so it does not need key or anything to penetrate in your body. And even less so radioactive mice Yet AIDS is caused by HIV irrespectively of the presence of anything special (including tritium) ergo, there is no link between tritium and AIDS. There is a basal level of radioactivity on earth (will vary depending on where you live), I seriously doubt that the amount of tritium is a significant contributor, as compared to radon and others. As for the rest of your argument linking oil and nuclear explosion, it is not quite clear.

Patrick

Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)

canalon wrote:So what? If tritium was *really* the key to AIDS, the HIV would not be necessary. H3 can replace hydrogen in every molecule, so it does not need key or anything to penetrate in your body. And even less so radioactive mice Yet AIDS is caused by HIV irrespectively of the presence of anything special (including tritium) ergo, there is no link between tritium and AIDS. There is a basal level of radioactivity on earth (will vary depending on where you live), I seriously doubt that the amount of tritium is a significant contributor, as compared to radon and others. As for the rest of your argument linking oil and nuclear explosion, it is not quite clear.

Usually, water and hydrocarbons with tritium which we engulf do not go directly into our DNA cells. But apparently, there are high tritium bearers which do intensive and direct implanting of the dangerous "explosive" in DNA.

Once again you are all wrong. Tritium is physiologically indistinguishable from deuterium or hydrogen. If it has been included in any organic molecule that can be used by a human, it will be processed the exact same way, and will end up in the exact same place than the non tritiated molecule. Not that there is usually quite a low amount of tritium naturally, and that makes it mostly irrelevant in terms of radiation emitted as compared to other natural sources. But of course if one is working in the lab with H3 Labelled molecules, care not to ingest it is necessary, the low energy of the alpha radiation means however that there is really very little need to handle with special protection. The only danger comes from ingestion and metabolization of the tritiated material.

Patrick

Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)

Honestly, I have never heard of Tritium, but I am still young when it comes to knowledge in many areas of science. I cannot, however, decipher much of the first post and would much appreciate it if someone could give me a quick rundown on what the substance is?

Also, I was under the impression that HIV was able to invade the genome because of the presence of Reverse Transcriptase, labelling it a retrovirus. I'm not sure how a connection has been made between this Tritium molecule and HIV but it seems rather irrelevant considering the behaviour of HIV itself has already been explained - a bit of a conspiracy story to me, at least.