The whole reason behind Homosexuals and Fascism is that they both reject God. If a fascist rejects God whats to keep him from becoming a homosexual? If a Homosexual rejects God whats to keep him from becoming a fascist?

The whole ideology behind these two is that they both believe Morals Are Subjective. When morals become subjective then anything is possible. There is no moral code to live by when morals are subjective. If they believe it is there right to steal then it must be morally right. If they believe its ok to kill someone then it's morally justified. That is why God says in Romans Chapter one verse 28-32.

Morals ARE subjective, you doss cunt. If God is the ultimate moral judge, then morals are still subjective, they are subjective to God. People do kill each other, sometimes for their own ends, sometimes for "God", sometimes so that you can drive a fucking SUV to church. So fuck the shut up.

Ffs. Homosexuality is not fascism and vice versa. And fascism didn't "reject God". The Nazis had their "Gott Mit Uns", and the Spanish and Italian fascists were openly in league with the Church. It's radical nationalism, not atheism.
"What's to keep (a homosexual) from becoming a fascist?" Maybe the fact that the Nazis rounded up homosexuals and put them in camps?
There is no ideology behind sexual attraction to a certain gender for Christ's sake.
There's already a consensus that murder and theft are objectively wrong. The only people you're going to find who disagree with that are sociopaths.

The whole reason behind homosexuals is that they are a safety-valve against over-population, and orphaned children with no-one to take care of them.

The whole reason behind fascism is Right-wing ideas of deciding for the little people what's best for them, and imposing that "best" onto them, whether they like it or not.

Morals are always subjective, stupid. Just look at the Bible God, who says "Thou Shalt Not Kill, unless I command you to". Most decent human beings, regardless of political view, gender, age, sexual orientation, skin-tone, ethnicity, etc, live by the Golden Rule; "treat others as you want to be treated".

"That is why Go says", what? Guess I have to google it.
Yeah, because no God-fearing Republican has ever been "full of envy, [...] strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, slanderers, [...] insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; they are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless."

Why did you stop at Chapter 1? What's wrong with the next chapter and verse? Romans 2:1: "You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge the other, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things."

Are you saying that slavery was morally just back when we had slaves? Would you have considered runaway slaves to be immoral? Would you have cooperated with the status quo back then in order to be moral?

If morality is to have any pertinent meaning then it is objectively that which on the whole helps everyone the most and harms the least. Society can't just redefine these things endlessly. Slavery is objectively harmful to another human being and so it is objectively immoral.

Objective morality is properly founded on logic and reason, not religion.

Almost assuredly, but so do you. Almost everyone makes subjective moral judgements all the friggin' time. From the fact that you allow your government to kill innocent Afghans and Iraqis, to the probability that you've coasted through a few stop signs when running late. You're a hypocrite.

What's to keep a Christian from becoming a fascist? Hitler and Mussolini were both Christians.

Your last sentence is incomplete. Paul was unclear, What exactly does: ..."to do those things which are not convenient..." mean?

And I notice your cherrypucking of homosexuals. Are you suggesting that Paul is not placing backbiters, fornication, covetousness etx on equal par? These, together with Paul's primitive understanding of homposexuality make you worthy of death. So don't cherrypick! If you do, you are perverting scripture, and that get's you damned.

This is a non sequitur - "it does not follow." While it is true that many of those in power in the Third Reich were open and closed homosexuals, Morality and Fascism are not necessarily mutually inclusive. Statistically, there are just as many Jewish or liberal homosexuals, and just about anything standing in contrast to Fascism. Typically, homosexuals account for 2-4 percent of an average population, according to peer-reviewed psychology journals. This is then without any basis of morality or ideology.

What's more, one could easily see a high preponderance of Republicans that are hetero in the open that are frequently caught in homo acts. Larry Craig is no different from Barney Frank, except for being closed where Frank is open.

Well, He isn't married*, and except for the one time He adulterously raped Little Mary He never seems to get any. Not with females. Must not have liked crossing over all that much. His buff, blond, blue eyed son was the same way, if you believe *cough* the stories.

The whole reason behind Homosexuals and Fascism is that they both reject God.

The Church was quite active in fascist Italy under Mussolini, as it was in Spain under Franco. Quite a few members of the clergy saw no fundamental disagreement between the demands of fascism and tenets of Christianity.