SystemModeler is a very general environment that handles modeling of systems with mechanical, electrical, thermal, chemical, biological, and other components, as well as combinations of different types of components. It’s based—like Mathematica—on the very general idea of representing everything in symbolic form.

In SystemModeler, a system is built from a hierarchy of connected components—often assembled interactively using SystemModeler‘s drag-and-drop interface. Internally, what SystemModeler does is to derive from its symbolic system description a large collection of differential-algebraic and other equations and event specifications—which it then solves using powerful built-in hybrid symbolic-numeric methods. The result of this is a fully computable representation of the system—that mirrors what an actual physical version of the system would do, but allows instant visualization, simulation, analysis, or whatever.

Here’s an example of SystemModeler in action—with a 2,685-equation dynamic model of an airplane being used to analyze the control loop for continuous descent landings:

There’s a long and tangled history of products that do various kinds of system modeling. The exciting thing about SystemModeler is that from its very foundations, it takes a new approach that dramatically unifies and generalizes what’s possible. In the past, products tended either to be specific to a particular application domain (like electric circuits or hydraulics), or were based on rigid low-level component models such as procedural blocks.

What SystemModeler does is to use a fully symbolic representation of everything, which immediately allows both arbitrary domains to be covered, and much more flexible models for components to be used. In the past, little could have been done with such a general representation. But the major breakthrough is that by using a new generation of hybrid symbolic-numeric methods, SystemModeler is capable of successfully solving for the behavior of even very large-scale such systems.

When one starts SystemModeler, there’s immediately a library of thousands of standard components—sensors, actuators, gears, resistors, joints, heaters, and so on. And one of the key features of SystemModeler is that it uses the new standard Modelica language for system specifications—so one can immediately make use of model libraries from component manufacturers and others.

SystemModeler is set up to automate many kinds of system modeling work. Once one’s got a system specified, SystemModeler can simulate any aspect of the behavior of the system, producing visualizations and 3D animations. It can also synthesize a report in the form of an interactive website—or generate a computable model of the system as a standalone executable.

But there’s more. Remember that we have Mathematica too. And SystemModeler integrates directly with Mathematica—bringing in our whole 25-yearMathematica technology stack.

This makes possible many spectacular things. Just like Mathematica can operate on data or images or programs, so now it can also operate on computable models from SystemModeler. This means that it takes just a line or two of Mathematica code to do a parameter sweep, or a sensitivity analysis, or a sophisticated optimization on a model from SystemModeler.

And one gets all of the interface features of Mathematica—being able to do visualizations, instantly introduce interactive controls, or produce computable CDF documents as reports.

But even more than this, one gets to use all of the algorithms and analysis capabilities of Mathematica. So it becomes straightforward to take a model, and do statistical analysis on it, build a control system for it, or export results in any of the formats Mathematica supports.

When one builds models, it’s often important to bring in real-world data, say material properties or real-time weather or cost information. And through its direct link to Wolfram|Alpha—as well as its custom data import capabilities—Mathematica can supply these to SystemModeler.

To me, it’s very satisfying seeing all these parts of our technology portfolio working together. And this is just the beginning. As I discussed in my post last year, it’s going to be possible to integrate system modeling not only with Mathematica, but also at a deep level with Wolfram|Alpha and such things as our mobile apps.

But today, it’s exciting to me to launch Wolfram SystemModeler as a major new direction for our company. Mathematica allows us to represent a vast range of formal and algorithmic systems; SystemModeler extends our reach to large-scale practical engineering and other systems. We already know some of the important things that this will make possible. But I’m sure there will be many wonderful surprises to come in the years ahead, as we gradually realize just what the power of symbolic systems modeling really is.

i 4th the above statements, even as a student i would like a home edition, simply be course i wont be a student for much longer. I want to be sure that i can continue to use it and even upgrade it even after i am finished studying.

Yes I wonder if it will be avaiable for home users it will be very fine to have such possibilty.
It seems great now I am loading trial version and sign in for web conference about SM.
Congratulation for next step in computation :)

@ Randi -
Thanks for your comment! While Wolfram SystemModeler is primarily used for modeling physical systems, there is a Modelica library called SystemsDynamics which can be used for business process modeling (a link is below, if you’d like to peruse that further).

I’m interested in the answer to Randi Wolf’s question.
And, before you try to sell it to a bunch of pilots (i.e., the US Air Force), you might want to change the example to show four engines, or the airframe body to something other than a four engine aircraft like the 747. I know, I know, it is just a generic graphic to represent everything from piper cubs to 777′s. But to sell to non-systems-analyst decision makers who are extremely visual, you might want to change the example.

SystemModeler is based on the Modelica modeling language (www.modelica.org) which can be used to represent systems of DAEs (differential algebraic equations). Any ‘system’ which can be represented by equations can be modeled in Modelica.

I was assuming a functionality like this would eventually be coming out as I could read between the lines in a previouis post circa 2009…what I was hoping for, however, would be a “new” version of Mathematica that included this new paradigm in it’s basic functionality, and would thus be part of the next version available for purchase by hobbiests…such as myself.

One of the biggest benefits of Wolfram research in the last few years is that they have made their products available to “curious” people such as myself – who just like to experiment, but who can’t affort $100,000 for all the MATLAB products, $3,000 for a Pro version of Mathematica, or a $10,000 a year license for SAS or similar programs, etc, etc.

What I hope is that Wolfram will make these latest releases (System Modeler/Finance Platform) available to consumers such as myself – please, don’t leave us out of this new fun!

Can you use this modeling software to produce engineering designs that are exportable to CAD programs such as AUTO CAD and Micro Station to produce engineering drawings? Can you produce a design in a CAD program and set it up where you can change dimensions or other property where the modling software will automatically test the design to see if it works or check if design performance improves. The modeling software then revises the design or you can set up an iterative process where drawing changes automatically if modeling software calulations show improvements or where design problems are uncovered? Do you plan to incorporate finite element analysis into this software?
As a precaution, when calculating fluid flows for piping make sure the pipe fitting loss data are up to date because many many fluid mechanics texts are using inaccurate fitting loss coefficient data some are almost 100 years old. The University of Utah Civil Engineering Department through ASHRA research grants have done research in this area and have starting compiling more accurate pipe friction loss coefficents.

the product looks interesting and it could be a good competitor for other simulation software. I used graphical simulation software basd oj creating objects by using a graphic interface. However, when we run a simulation the single interation is very low! Obviosusly, that’s because graphic comonents. So, I would like to knwo how System Modeler work in relation to the speed of the simulation iterations? Symbolic-numeric form means a low computational speed with regard to numeric only form? I am not a totally beginner on simulation software but I would like to undesrtand better computational fetaures of System Modeler. Actually, my model is about mechanical representation of human jumping by using 3 or more link segments which are driven by torque generators supported by rotational in serie springs. Would it be possible with System Modeler?
thanks

The only pity is, so few people know about Modelica yet, and one of the reasons might be the lack of free documentation. This situation might improve if the Kickstarter project for a free Modelica book is successful: http://kck.st/PXZj40

I could not agree with you more. This is also why Wolfram is a proud gold sponsor of this book project. We also welcome evryone interested in SystemModeler and Modelica to contribute in order to make the project succesful!