(Reopens DES 57)

The family was not paid compensation and Public Grievance system (PGMS) rejected their grievance petitions thrice.

"No policy can discriminate life of a doctor from that of a soldier for purposes of compensation. Deadly disease like swine flu is as worse as a killing assailant. If there is no such security measure, it is difficult to give moral strength to young doctors to treat suffering citizens," Acharyulu said.

He said it was the duty of the state to form a uniform policy to provide compensation to families for unforeseen death of employees during service, and inform the people about it.

"In this case, the young doctors family has the right to know whether they are entitled to compensation. If so, why not one crore rupees as given to an officer killed on duty? The state has to explain reasons for not treating a doctor on par with police," the Information Commissioner said.

The Commissioner further noted that the CMO chose to transfer the RTI request to three departments instead of informing the appellant about their policy or reasons for absence of policy.

Acharyulu said not only the family of the deceased doctor, the entire population legitimately expects a uniform policy from the CMO.

"Besides, appellant has a right to know why a familys claim is rejected by a PGMS," he said.

Acharyulu stated that the Public Grievance Management System suffers from two serious deficiencies; the given password does not work and even if it works, the status of rejected will be revealed without giving any reasons.

"If the password does not work, the applicant hits an iron wall and he can do nothing. Even if he could open the status report, he does not have reasons for rejection and he has no way to secure the reasons," he added. PTI ABS SRY PAL SRY

This is unedited, unformatted feed from the Press Trust of India wire.

Do You Like This Story? Awesome! Now share the story Too bad. Tell us what you didn't like in the comments