The "RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0" and the "RDF Semantics"
docs seem to group (classify?) the vocabulary of RDF in a different
manner: one just in "classes"and "properties", the latter according to
the namespaces "rdf" and "rdfs"
My questions:
1. are the rdf: and rdfs: namespaces just historical, or
they still denote some (deep) differences between the corresponding
vocabularies?
2. What would be the "best" (recommended) way of presenting (and grouping)
the whole vocabulary, say, for pedagogical purposes?
thanks,
claudio gutierrez
Univ. Chile