THE APPEALS CHAMBER of the International Tribunal for the
Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian
Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 ("International
Tribunal");

BEING SEISED of a "Motion of Appellant, Esad Landzo, to Vary
Order On Second Motion to Preserve and Provide Evidence", filed on 7 September 1999
("Motion");

NOTING the "Defendant Esad Lanzos Notice of
Appeal", filed on 1 December 1998, wherein he sets out his grounds of appeal, which
include, inter alia, that his right to a fair and expeditious trial pursuant to
Articles 20 and 21 of the Statute of the International Tribunal "were violated when
verdict and sentence were rendered by a Trial Chamber whose presiding Judge was permitted
to sleep through much of the proceedings" ("Fourth Ground of Appeal");

NOTING the "Second Motion to Preserve and Provide
Evidence", filed on 12 May 1999, wherein Esad Landzo requested that Counsel
acting on his behalf be granted access to the daily videotapes produced by Camera 3 in
Courtroom I during his trial in order to assist him in the presentation of the Fourth
Ground of Appeal;

NOTING the "Order on the Second Motion to Preserve and Provide
Evidence" issued on 15 June 1999 ("Order on Access to
Videotapes"), in which the Appeals Chamber ordered, inter alia, (i) that
Counsel or Co-counsel for Esad Landzo or their legal assistant(s) under a specified
time-period and subject to a number of conditions be allowed to view particular videotapes
of the proceedings conducted in open session during the trial of the Appellant, and (ii)
that only Counsel or Co-counsel for the Appellant be permitted, during the same
time-period and subject to the same conditions, to view videotapes of those portions of
the Appellants trial that were conducted in closed session;

NOTING FURTHER the "Order on Motion by Esad Landzo for
Extension of Time to File Supplementary Brief", issued on 29 July 1999 ("Order
for Extension"), in which the Appeals Chamber extended the time-period in which
Counsel or Co-counsel for the Appellant or their legal assistant(s) may view the
videotapes in question until 15 October 1999;

CONSIDERING that the Appellant in the Motion requests the Appeals
Chamber to vary the Order on Access to Videotapes so as to permit his legal assistant, Ms
Nancy Boler, to view video-recordings also of those portions of the Appellants
trial that were conducted in closed session;

NOTING the "Prosecutions Response to Motion of
Appellant, Esad Landzo, to Vary Order on Second Motion to Preserve and Provide
Evidence", filed on this day, in which the Office of the Prosecutor states that it
does not oppose the Motion on the understanding that the requested variance of the Order
on Access to Videotapes would pertain only to Ms Nancy Boler and that all terms and
conditions of the previous order would apply also to her;

CONSIDERING the fundamental importance of ensuring that the
confidentiality of information disclosed in proceedings conducted in closed session be
respected and maintained;

CONSIDERING that Ms Nancy Boler, a member of the Bar of Texas,
United States of America, previously served as Co-counsel for the Appellant at the trial
stage of the present case;

CONSIDERING that, in the circumstances of the present case,
sufficient guarantees for the maintenance of confidentiality exist to allow Ms Nancy Boler
access to the material in question, subject to the condition that any information thus
received not be disclosed to anyone other than the Appellant, his Counsel or his
Co-counsel;

HEREBY GRANTS the Motion;

AND ORDERS that:

1. Upon the filing of the undertaking of non-disclosure as provided by
order No. 3 below, Ms Nancy Boler may view the videotapes of proceedings conducted in
closed session and produced by Camera 3 in Courtroom I and Camera 3 in Courtroom III
during the trial of the Appellant, for the purposes and under the conditions stated in the
Order on Access to Videotapes, as amended by the Order for Extension;

2. Ms Nancy Boler shall be bound by the orders for protective measures
made by the Trial Chamber and shall not disclose any information received through the
viewing of the videotapes to anyone other than the Appellant, his Counsel or his
Co-counsel;

3. Ms Nancy Boler shall confirm her obligation pursuant to order No. 2
above by filing before the Appeals Chamber an undertaking of non-disclosure of this
information, which will be made available to her through the Registry;

4. Any breach of the orders numbered 1 and 2 above, or the terms of the
undertaking filed pursuant to order No. 3 above, shall render Ms Nancy Boler liable to
proceedings pursuant to Rule 77 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the
International Tribunal.