That Didn't Take Long: Vonage Asks Court To Review Verizon Patents Under New Supreme Court Rules

from the quick-response dept

Well, that certainly didn't take very long at all. Just a day after the Supreme Court smacked down the Federal Circuit for not properly reviewing patents for "obviousness," Vonage has used the case as an opportunity to ask the courts for a retrial in their VoIP patent lawsuit with Verizon. Vonage claims that, under the new obviousness test, Verizon's patents may be toast. When combined with recent discoveries of prior art that certainly may be true. This certainly is opportunistic of Vonage, but it will be interesting to see how the courts react to this request. One thing that that's definitely become clear is that courts at all levels are actually going to have to look more closely at obviousness, rather than brushing it off as they have for years. In the meantime, expect many more cases along these lines in the near future. It may clog the system for a bit, but if the end result is fewer bogus patents, it's worth it.

What the hell is obviousness

In regards to this case of course. to me this is not so obvious. Is not a patent a patent and if it is infringed upon is that not obvious. Obviously since this has not been commented on by anyone other than us it is quite clear this court is to smart for their own good. Ummm, I don't know what I'm saying, maybe I have not had enough coffee this morning...THIS IS OBVIOUS...

What happened to personal conscience

Todays business world you have to have a law to tell you that your obviously wrong and then a court to make you do it. Then what is the next law I can skirt around. It reminds me of a lawyer turned former president was guest lecturing at my cousins law school. He said laws were not to be obeyed but broken. If we lived in a society were morals was king and money was not. Then people like this would be socially ruined. No amount of money could buy an ounce of respect. It doesn't matter what your bank account is. What does matter what you did to get that bank account.

Obvious.

What's OBVIOUS is that Verizon's original claim that Vonage was infringing one or more of their "patents" is complete and utter BS. And this is why Vonage is filing for a re-trial. Verizon filed a false claim and paid off a judge to get a ruling in their favor...to get Vonage shut down. Now that the courts are starting to realize that all these "you stole my idea" cases are bogus...Vonage definetely has a good chance for a re-trial. I am all for it and I hope Vonage wins.

Payback...

I understand there were no contengiencies for RIM to get its money back but I'm sure they will try to come up with something. It would be so nice if they did. I know that it is almost impossible to prove effort in the market but everyone knows that NTP didn't even try to innovate and just waited for someone else to do the work for them.

Re: Re: What the hell is obviousness

Patent cry is Bull!!!!

Verizon is obviously jealous of Vonage because they can offer a better service much cheaper than those crooks at Verizon!!!! Stop Hatin Verizon and lower your prices for the same service. Oh I forgot...You guys don't offer the service.

Re: Patent cry is Bull!!!!

Okay, I think Verizon sucks as much as the next guy, but they do offer a service very similar to Vonage at the exact same pricepoint: Voicewing by Verizon (https://www22.verizon.com/ForYourHome/VOIP/VOIPHome.aspx)

I was actually considering switching from Vonage to them until they sued Vonage.

"exploiting chances offered by immediate circumstances without reference to a general plan or moral principle"

Nope, not opportunistic. While they are taking advantage of new court decision, they have that right and they are not doing so in an immoral way. It seems fairly clear that Verizon's patents are blatantly obvious, of the "you got chocolate in my peanut" variety and there seems to be prior art--making them doubly invalid.

Re: patents

If you have nothing better to do than complain, why don't you start your own blog. You can sit on there and rant about how great you are all day long, and then you will only be affecting yourself instead of making everyone else read your silly cross-thread whining.

Significant developments in 2007

Significant developments in 2007 to date are:

- In January 2007, the Company received a Notice of Allowance from the United States Patent and Trademark Office with respect to its "Private IP Communication Network Architecture" patent application, which covers the delivery of telecommunication type services across a network using digital technology.

- On March 21 2007, the European Patent Office published its decision to grant C2 a European patent that is equivalent to its U.S. Patent No. 6,243,373.

Please see the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed with the SEC on March 16, 2007, and the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2007, filed with the SEC on May 4, 2007, for further information.

About C2 Global Technologies Inc.

C2's business is focused on licensing its patents, which include two foundational patents in VoIP technology. C2 plans to realize value from its intellectual property by offering licenses to service providers, equipment companies and end-users that are deploying VoIP networks for phone-to-phone communications. For further information, please visit C2's website at www.c-2technologies.com.