8
Prensky, Mark. “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants”. On the Horizon, 9:5 (October 2001). “Our students have changed radically. Today’s students are no longer the people our educational system was designed to teach.”

10
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX “Over the past 20 years, young adults (18- 34) have declined from being those most likely to read literature to those least likely (with the exception of those 65 and older). The rate of decline for the youngest adults, aged 18 to 24 was 55 percent greater than the total adult population.” Foreman, Joel. “Next-Generation Educational Technology Versus the Lecture.” Hill, Kelly. “Reading at Risk; A Survey of Literary Reading in America” National Endowment for the Arts Research Division Report, 46 (June 2004) Reading Less

13
O’Reilly, Brian. “Meet the Future.” Fortune 142.3 (2000): 144-157. “It is clear from talking with them that they already know they don’t want to live and work the way we do.” p. 144 Generational Clash Digital Native Students

15
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX producer-push approach the ‘sage on the stage’ lecture model demand pull “… it is hard to imagine a more producer-push approach than the ‘sage on the stage’ lecture model that dominates undergraduate education. Can higher education move the curriculum in ways that take advantage of demand pull, and will colleges and universities design their infrastructures to support that approach?” p. 60 Foreman, Joel. “Next-Generation Educational Technology Versus the Lecture.” Hilton, James. “The Future for Higher Education: Sunrise or Perfect Storm?” Educause Review 41.2 March/April 2006 59-71 Experiential; Pull