“In NS Germany, groups such as Muslims and Buddhists were accorded full respect, and allowed to practise their religion freely. In the pre-war years, NS Germany helped organize a pan-Islamic world congress in Berlin. … The Berlin Mosque held regular prayers even during the war years, attended by Arabs, Indians, Turks, Afghans … While the British in Egypt and Palestine were treating the Arabs as conquered subjects, the Germans were treating them as equals, as comrades.” – David Myatt

The alliance between political Islam and National Socialism goes beyond the existence of a common Jewish/Western enemy. While not formally based on historical ties (except perhaps the German-Ottoman military collaboration during WWI and subsequent shared humiliation at the hands of the Allied Powers by the Treaty of Versailles and Treaty of Sevres respectively, never forgotten by German veterans who later became NSDAP members), the policies of Islam and National Socialism – rejecting usury, democracy, capitalism, communism, racism and secularism, and promoting virtually cognate concepts such as ”Weltanschuuang”/”Deen”, ”Jihad”/”Kampf”, ”Ummah”/”Folk”, “Khilafa”/”Reich”, “Imam”/Fuehrer”, etc. - have been considered mutually compatible by astute representatives of both groups. Hitler promised: “The Japanese, the Chinese and the peoples of Islam will always be closer to us than, for example, France.” National Socialism, in return, was recognized in Islamic countries not only as the alternative to remaining subjugated as Western colonies, but also as a genuine non-Islamic ally which it had not previously possessed. National Socialist Germany’s diplomatic and military efforts - not least the Wehrmacht tasked with rebuilding mosques that had been destroyed by communist forces - were enthusiastically welcomed by the slogan: “God above us in heaven, Hitler with us on earth!”

“As allies, I prefer the Turks to the Bulgarians. … The population of Sofia was enthusiastically welcoming a Russian football team. The fact is that Bulgaria is strongly affected by Panslavism, both on the political and on the sentimental level. … On the political and sentimental level, there’s no obstacle to an alliance between Turkey and the Reich. By reason of her attachment to Islam, Turkey has a completely clear-cut religious policy. The same is not true of Bulgaria, which, since it practises the Greek Orthodox religion, finds in it new reasons to feel friendly towards Russia.” – Adolf Hitler

This is an alliance which Aryanists continue to honour today, especially at a time when Muslims as a group are being targeted as part of the Zionist agenda, as has been the case ever since the 9/11 Zionist false flag attacks was blamed on so-called “Islamic terrorists”. On the one hand we aim to infuse the ideas of Aryanism and National Socialism into Islamic political thought, and on the other hand we aim to promote unity and solidarity among non-Jews - UNITY THROUGH NOBILITY - in opposition to all organizations that promote Islamophobia. As such, we support all efforts to counter negative stereotyping of Muslims.

“These people are shocked at the idea that a Turk may have four legitimate wives, but they admit that the Prussian Princes had forty, and often more, mistresses in the course of their lives. Such hypocrisy drives me to fury. The Prussian Prince, as he gets bored with his successive mistresses, can pack them off like bits of refuse of no importance, and we have here among us blackguards who regard them as men of honour.” – Adolf Hitler

“The precepts ordering peoples to wash, to avoid certain drinks, to fast at appointed dates, to take exercise, to rise with the sun, to climb to the top of the minaret – all these were obligations invented by intelligent people. The exhortation to fight courageously is also self-explanatory.” – Adolf Hitler

“Few people even among the so-called greatest ones, have ever had enough pluck to stand all their lives, day after day, against the suggestions of economic pressure — to become poorer still, while poor already, generously, for the sake of a higher urge; to be openhearted and openhanded, noble in their treatment of creatures, while themselves hungry and despised. We knew such a person in India, a humble woman, living in wretched surroundings and crippled, who begged for her food, and yet who could not witness an animal’s distress without doing something to relieve it. She still picks up and feeds the poor unwanted kittens that other human beings have thrown into the street; she once adopted a puppy she had found, half dead, under a heap of rubbish; and at the time we knew her she managed to feed some twenty or twenty-five starving cats and several stray dogs of the locality. … The woman happens to be a Muslim. Her name is Zobeida Khatun. She used to live at 97B, Taltala Lane, Calcutta, at the time we knew her.” – Savitri Devi

A disabled veteran speaks out.

Recent years have seen an upsurge in many countries of swastika graffiti on walls of Islamic community centres or even private homes of Muslim individuals, sometimes accompanied by pigs’ heads, pigs’ carcasses or pigs’ blood (occasionally a live pig is brought along by the Islamophobes and killed on site for maximum shock effect). Muslims should be aware that the perpetrators of such vandalism (not to mention cruelty to pigs) were not authentic National Socialists (by definition!), but rather either Islamophobic neo-Nazis, or Zionist agents deliberately trying to instill negative impressions among Muslims towards National Socialism. On a wider scale, Islamophobes often portray themselves as representatives of Christianity, another falsehood. Authentic National Socialists today unequivocally condemn such cruel and cowardly actions, just as the NSDAP condemned similar actions in history, as Gottfried Feder put it: “All good Christians will disapprove the cruelties practiced in the name of the Cross by the Inquisition.” If we were in power, we would punish such cowardly vandals much more ruthlessly than the current Zionist governments ever would.

74 Islamophobe thugs violently stormed a mosque in Poitiers. Zionist French police allowed them to stay for six hours, and none were punished afterwards. (But “Holocaust deniers” can get five years’ prison in France, while those who merely call for boycotting Israel can be fined more than $1000.)

“The Germans know how to get rid of the Jews … They have definitely solved the Jewish problem.” – Mohammed Amin al-Husseini

One of the most prominent anti-Zionist activists following WWI and one of the earliest critics of the Balfour Declaration, his work soon expanded into promoting resistance against the colonial powers as a whole, especially the British Empire. His collaboration with Hitler began with National Socialist Germany supporting his 1936 Arab Revolt in Palestine through Adolf Eichmann, following which al-Husseini in 1940 requested Axis support to “settle the question of Jewish elements in Palestine and other Arab countries in accordance with national and folkish interests of the Arabs and along lines similar to those used to solve the Jewish question in Germany and Italy.” Together they supported the 1941 Iraqi Revolt and recognized Rashid Ali al-Gaylani and his government as the Iraqi government-in-exile. As a symbol of their alliance, the SS Division Handschar was formed (20,000 strong, 90% Muslim) and deployed in WWII, with more following as WWII continued.

“The Waffen SS enlarged its ranks to include 60,000 Islamic SS. The Waffen SS respected their way of life, their customs, and their religious beliefs. Each Islamic SS battalion had an imam, each company had a mullah. It was our common wish that their qualities found their highest expression.” – Leon Degrelle

Handschar division reading “Islam and Jewry”

For comparison, in 1941 the Jewish group Irgun Zevai Leumi actually made the following offer to Hitler: “On condition that the German government recognizes the national aspirations of the ‘Movement for the Freedom of Israel’ (Lehi), the National Military Organization (NMO) proposes to participate in the war on the side of Germany.” Needless to say, they were completely ignored.

National Socialist Influence in the Middle East

“Never, at any price, should we have put our money on France and against the peoples subjected to her yoke. On the contrary, we should have helped them to achieve their liberty and, if necessary, should have goaded them into doing so. There was nothing to stop us in 1940 from making a gesture of this sort in the Near East and in North Africa. … Our ‘gentlemen’ obviously preferred to maintain cordial relations with distinguished Frenchmen, rather than with a lot of hirsute revolutionaries, with a chorus of musical comedy officers, whose one idea was to cheat us, rather than with the Arabs, who would have been loyal partners for us.” – Adolf Hitler

“Had we been on our own, we could have emancipated the Muslim countries dominated by France; and that would have had enormous repercussions in the Near East, dominated by Britain, and in Egypt. … All Islam vibrated at the news of our victories. The Egyptians, the Iraqis and the whole of the Near East were all ready to rise in revolt. Just think what we could have done to help them, even to incite them, as would have been both our duty and in our own interest! But the presence of the Italians at our side paralysed us. … The memories of the barbarous reprisals taken against the Senussi are still vivid. … The Italians prevented us from playing our best card, the emancipation of the French subjects and the raising of the standard of revolt in the countries oppressed by the British. Such a policy would have aroused the enthusiasm of the whole of Islam. It is a characteristic of the Muslim world, from the shores of the Atlantic to those of the Pacific, that what affects one, for good or for evil, affects all.” – Adolf Hitler

Following National Socialist Germany’s defeat in WWII, many former Third Reich officials regrouped in Egypt to continue anti-Zionist activism. Some, such as Bernhard Bender, Altern Erich, Leopold Gleim and Alois Moser, converted to Islam. Responding to the forced establishment of the Jewish state of Israel from what had been British-occupied Palestine, al-Husseini and collaborators worked towards regional unity and overthrowing Israel, culminating in the Arab-Israeli War. His defeat in 1948 resulted in roughly 700,000 Palestinians fleeing to neighbouring states.

The UN and the ‘reputable’ Western powers, meanwhile, have showed active diplomatic support towards Israeli plans for expansion, including helping Israel become nuclear-armed (and, unlike any other country in the world, without being required to declare their nuclear arsenal!). The Jewish-owned media have created a false dichotomy between support for a so-called “two-state solution” and refusal to recognize the legitimacy of Palestine at all, thereby sidelining the correct position that it is Israel whose legitimacy should not be and should never have been recognized. Nonetheless, Palestinian resistance to Israeli occupation continues to this day, and has generated devoted sympathizers and fans from all around the world. But on the state level, the majority of countries which adamantly refuse to recognize the legitimacy of Israel and refuse to have diplomatic relations with Israel continue so far to be countries with a strong Islamic presence. At least some credit for this pattern should be given to National Socialist ideological influence, especially considering that Hitler is considered a heroic figure in many of these countries.

“The Mohammedan World is awaiting Him under the features of “the Mahdi,” Whom Allah shall send “at the end of times,” to crush all evil through the power of His sword — “after the Jews will once more have became the masters of Jerusalem” and “after the Devil will have taught men to set even the air they breathe, on fire.”” – Savitri Devi

Palestinians raise swastika to taunt IDF

Syria

Ba’athism, which has led Syria for decades, was heavily influenced by National Socialism.

The Syrian Social Nationalist Party formed by Antun Saadeh (second in popularity to the Ba’ath Party) adopted a stylized swastika.

Egypt

Otto Remer was Security Advisor to Abdel Nasser.

Hans Ulrich-Rudel and Otto Skorzeny, recruited SS and Gestapo officers to take posts in Nasser’s regime.

Saddam Hussein and Abdel Nasser (President of Egypt) were close friends before either assumed power, both influenced by Ba’athism.

Iran

The Shah of Iran was pro-Axis during WWII. (“The sound of German officers’ footsteps was heard on the shores of the Nile. Swastika flags were flying from the outskirts of Moscow to the peaks of the Caucasus Mountains. Iranian patriots eagerly awaited the arrival of their old allies.”)

Britain and the USSR forced the Shah to abdicate in favour of his son.

Lebanon

Hezbollah is infamous for its salute.

“Consider how the peoples of the West were deluged with anti-Taliban propaganda before the Western invasion of Afghanistan, and how the same type of propaganda was used against Saddam Hussein before the invasion of Iraq. There are striking parallels with the propaganda used against Adolf Hitler and NS Germany before the First Zionist War.” – David Myatt

The Islamic world has a starting advantage in understanding National Socialism because its masses have not been subjected to the extent of Zionist propaganda prevalent in most other countries that has falsely portrayed National Socialism as a racist ideology. But if we are to build on this advantage today, we must have Muslim anti-Zionists willing to join our movement and engage in constructive ideological discussion, not merely on the practical side such as anti-Zionist activism, but on the theoretical side also, starting with our definitions of freedom and nobility. Such activists should aim at building a new, positive image of authentic applied Mohammedanism to counter the negative caricature of Islamic fundamentalism promulgated by present-day ZC and BS propagandists. To this end, we strongly recommend adoption of our terminology convention, whereby the term “Mohammedanism” be used to refer to the religion as a whole and the term “Islam” be used to refer solely to its socio-political aspect.

David Myatt

“The downfall of The White Hordes of Homo Hubris, the destruction of their nation-States, of The West itself, is something not only to be desired, but also striven toward by all practical means.” – David Myatt

For decades a National Socialist and anti-Zionist ideologist with a heavy emphasis on ethics based on personal honour, Myatt converted to Islam in 1998 and made several attempts to syncretize the two systems and refresh the alliance between their respective followers, as well as speak out in many interviews against Islamophobia following 9/11. In his words: “The more I pursued this strategy of co-operation, the more I became aware of the wide gulf, the difference, between us: the more acutely I felt, knew and understood, the nobility, the honour, of Muslims (and especially of the Mujahideen) who strove to obey only Allah Subhanahu wa Ta’ala, and the hypocrisy, the dishonour, the arrogance, the hubris, the decadence, of the kuffar of the modern West,” and “If nationalists, or some of them, desire to aid us, to help us, they can do the right thing, the honourable thing, and convert, revert, to Islam — accepting the superiority of Islam over and above each and every way of the West.” While his work has since shifted to other areas, we carry the flame from where he left off.

“The Arabian epoch … was the most cultured, the most intellectual and in every way best and happiest epoch in Spanish history. It was followed by the period of the persecutions with its unceasing atrocities.” – Adolf Hitler

#YouAintNoMuslimBruv

Jewish-dominated media and academia have made a high-profile issue out of Muslim presence in Western countries, claiming that Muslim communities are culturally hostile and a threat to national security. They place huge news spotlights on any crime suspects with Koranic first names, most of whom are clearly not practicing Muslims (notably, most of the suspects are described as drinking alcohol, which is forbidden to all true Muslims, but of course the Islamophobes fail to notice this), and then hold them up as examples of typical “Muslims”. Besides drawing public attention away from Jewish behaviour by making another group the centre of attention, this trick moreover discourages non-Muslims from interacting with Muslims in the same local neighbourhood. The latter is necessary to Zionist interests because Muslim communities on one hand offer a viable ecosystem running in parallel to the Jewish-dominated corporate power structure, and on the other hand tend to be at least moderately well-informed about Zionism. Indeed the Muslim presence has already changed in a positive way the entire debate about Palestine in many countries that only a few decades ago would never have questioned the legitimacy of Israel. It is also constantly challenging “Holocaust” education in school curricula. The only way to prevent this influence from spreading (and hastening the fall of Jewish domination) is to persuade non-Muslims to distrust everything Muslim-related and thereby not join the alternative ecosystem and alternative worldview.

“Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers … then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone.” – Adolf Hitler

Once this is understood, it becomes clear that the present “anti-Sharia campaign”, “Counterjihad” and related movements have virtually nothing to do with culture or safety and virtually everything to do with economics and dependence. Jews attempt to portray Muslims as “invaders” of Western countries, but it is more accurate to say that Muslims are trying to drive out the post-WWII Zionist occupation. In other words, the slaves are being incited by the slavemasters to attack the rescue. This exact same trick was previously used to call for war against National Socialist Germany. Will the people fall for it again?

The far-right talks endlessly about “Islamization”, while their controlled mainstream media opposition claims that: “There is no threat of Islamization”, sneakily programming audiences to view Islamization as a threat if it were real and then merely reassuring them it is not real (which they are unlikely to believe). Thus both sides work in concert to promote Islamophobia. Sincere anti-Islamophobia propaganda should instead speak of an opportunity for Islamization.

“If I had my way, I’d require placards to be hung in all the schools, at every street corner, and in every public room, on which would be printed nothing but Schopenhauer’s description of the Jews: ‘Great masters of the lie’! There is no better description.” – Adolf Hitler

Current activism:

1) While Islamophobia is being fed to all non-Muslims, it is being fed in particularly large doses to those who are Jew-aware, in order to hinder anti-Zionist unity. As Aryanists, we must be adept at countering this. A common lie told by our enemies is that Muslims are a tribe just as Jews are. This is easily rebutted by pointing out that the Islamic goal is that one day everyone will become Muslim (ie. no more tribes), whereas the Judaic goal is that one day every Jew will have 2600 non-Jewish slaves (ie. domination of one tribe over everyone else for all time). Another tactic is to claim that if we oppose Judaism, we should oppose all “Abrahamic religions”. This is best rebutted by rejecting the validity of the term “Abrahamic religions”, since the Jewish god is not the Christian-Mohammedan god. (If anything, it would be more accurate to call Christianity and Mohammedanism “Zoroastrian religions”!)

2) Muslims form the largest and best-organized community in the economic boycott of Zionist products (ie. kosher products, products of Israel, products of companies which financially support Israel, and products of companies owned by Jews). Since we boycott Zionist products anyway, a good way to do so is to buy from Islamic retailers, who are also less likely to order from Zionist suppliers. With particular regard to food, halal-labelled food from independent producers is a good option for anyone worried about the possible deliberate addition of harmful ingredients into non-kosher food by predominantly Jewish-owned food industries but who also wish to avoid kosher food that leads to extra Jewish profit.) For those of us with substantial savings, Islamic banks are also worth looking into as an option to drop off the Jewish-controlled usury grid.

3) Media attempts to demonize Islam are more effectively countered when non-Muslims speak up in defence of Islam than when Muslims do so. At all opportunities, we should expose who controls the media and why it benefits them to demonize Islam. On the other hand, we must make every effort to distinguish ourselves from False Left defenders of Islam who insist on portraying Islamophobia as equivalent to so-called ”anti-Semitism”. Instead, we must use all opportunities to explain why opposition to Jewish domination is a moral duty, and then to reframe our True Left defence of Islam as strategically coherent with this duty.