Tuesday, May 3, 2011

In a clandestine operation a group of men entered a foreign country, without permission of its

government, attacked a domestic residence, killed three people including a woman, made off with the body of one of them; which they subsequently dumped in the ocean, without participation of the relatives of the deceased.

These are the facts of the matter. They were a consequence of a “wanted dead or alive” notice issued by George Bush, previous President of the united States of America.

CNN has just screened an in depth report featuring President Obama and Admiral William H. McRaven, Commander of the Navy Seals at the time, as it is the 5th anniversary of the event.

In reaction to the raid and killing, nearly the whole world expressed approval, ranging from satisfaction, solemn exaltation to wild exuberance. We did this, even though the “Wild West” days in which men were flushed out by a posse, and killed on a wanted dead or alive notice, are long gone.

This world is made up of mostly good people who, by and large, insist on certain sacred principles. These include the fact that -

a person is presumed to be innocent until proved guilty before an independent adjudicating authority;

that extra judicial killing is murder;

that one cannot be accuser, judge/jury and executioner.

The fact that the execution was on foreign soil, after clandestine invasion, is aggravating of the violation of these dearly held sacred beliefs and norms, embedded in a raft of dogmata called human rights. Indeed these rights are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights signed off by nearly all governments at the United Nations in 1948 after two World Wars and the Holocaust..

That is our belief set. They are a fundamental component of what we insist on, fight for and defend, having learnt from the lessons of history. We say that anything short of this is injustice. We say that an injustice to one is an injustice to all.

"We are bound by an inescapable garment of mutuality, whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly."

Dr. Martin Luther King, jr.

- letter from the Birmingham Jail, 1962 -

But for the fact that the victim was Osama Bin Laden, we would have undoubtedly had an entirely opposite reaction and would have expressed negative emotions, ranging from disapproval to extreme condemnation.

In my book1 I advert to a saying that – “some are good even the bad, some are bad even the good”. The phenomenon of Bin Laden has managed to emphatically validate this saying. Many believe that bad boy Bin Laden was good. However the vast majority of good folk the world over, have suddenly ignored/changed all of the most fundamental and sacred rules that we post at the very center of unalienable human rights.

We have this “bad” approach because we have accepted what has been served up by the media. Bin Laden has been caricatured as the devil incarnate. At a stroke the awesome power of the media is demonstrated. It has induced an almost universal anti Bin Laden hysteria. In that hysteria we fail to distinguish what is information and what is proof beyond reasonable doubt.

We abandon all standards and our sacred beliefs. We have all accepted information from the media, not evidence, let alone proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

In the process Bin Laden, and those who died with him, accused and convicted of nothing, were divested of all their human rights … as were the 2752 innocent victims from 97 countries on 9/11, as well as so many others around the world. The blood of the innocents cry out, not so much for justice as for vengeance.

Admiral McRaven specifically disavows vengeance as having been the motive for the raid and the killing and claims that it was about justice. So does President Obama.As a qulaified lawyer President Obama must know that extra-judicial killing can never be about justice. It is the antithesis of justice because this Lady is left out of the picture. She is Lady Justice. She is blind to the status and repution of those that appear before her and only goes on hard evidence that must be proved in open court.

So, as much as we, good people, may profess to believe in standards that accord with a level of personal integrity that we have assigned ourselves as civilized human beings, in the end we have been forced to accept that the ancients were not wrong when they insisted on “an eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth”. *

All of the above is guaranteed once some believe that the gratuitous killing of other innocent human beings is justified in order to make a political statement. This thinking is grotesque, obscene and abhorrent on every count … and we instinctively all know that no God can approve of it.

2 comments:

Mervyn Greenland
said...

The boundaries of the modern terrorist warfare by design, are never clearly defined. The battle lines, therefore, are drawn in the places where ever he is to be found thus negating the sovereignty of the hide-out. The MOD of the terrorist is quintessentially 'clandestine', it is thus that he is sought and killed. 2752 dear lives lost as collateral damage in 9/11, then the three lost innocent souls are the tears of that same collateral damage. Perhaps the Bin Laden assassination is an eloquent vindication of the adage: 'All is fair in love and war'

Now what proof do you have that he killed 2752 humans???We only have media footage ... untested media footage.That is not EVIDENCE.It could have been done by actors ... just for a start.The point I am making is that we have rules, sacred rules, that we made after centuries of bitter/hard experience as to how we deal with people accused of crime and wrongdoing.Even when we enforce these rules there are many innocent people that are convicted as the Justice Project in the USA has proved.I don't think for a moment you would agree that your son can be executed without trial because of media info??Do you??Explain?