Taking pictures of a "crime scene" does not "compromise" it, it
only documents what has already happened. It may interfere with the ability of
"authorities" to have exclusive "control" of how they wish to
document and portray what happened.

The policy of destroying pictures or not allowing pictures to be taken should
not be allowed. It allows for the so called authorities to fabricate the
circumstances knowing there will not be pictures to refute what they say. It has
been proven time after time thatlaw enforcement in many cases are worse
then the criminals they are supposed to protect the public from. It may not be
with criminal intent but pictures may also show the incompetance of the
investigators. They feel safe if they can promote a senario with out the risk of
that being shown false. Sunshine is the best disinfectant.

"Police are waiting for two key pieces of information: toxicology reports
that would determine whether Hedglin was under the influence of drugs or alcohol
at the time he stole the plane and an analysis of the plane's voice
recorder and data box, Van Fleet said." ~ article

==================

Watch for this in the coming days:

Right off of the FDA’s own Black Label warning….

“Suicidality and Antidepressant Drugs

Antidepressants
increased the risk compared to placebo of suicidal thinking and
behavior…”

Painting over a company logo is common sense and nothing sinister. No company
wants to see their logo in photo after photo of an air disaster of any type.
Like it or not, it creates an unhealthy image in people's minds. Companies
spend millions of dollars building their brand and do everything they can to
protect it. Of course, you notice the Deseret News shows a photo with the logo
still on the aircraft. Typical journalistic sensitivity!