>
> Ah... then about this bit:
>
> -------
> The use of the phrase "asserted triple" in the third condition is a
> deliberate weasel-worded artifact, intended to allow an RDF graph or
> document to contain triples which are being used for some
> non-assertional purpose.
> -------
> -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-mt-20020214/
>
> I suggest it's time to get rid of the weasle-words.
>
> The most straightforward thing to do is to strike that text.
> That's my preference.
I second that proposal.
Dark triples have now wasted a hold load of time and money.
They have a cool name; and may strike Pat and Peter as a cool idea.
But they are not in RDF M&S; they are not necessary; they do not clarify
M&S; they are not in charter.
Jeremy