Ahrar al-Sham Shura council leader 'Sheikh Abu Issa' tweets not long after Jabhat Fateh al-Sham spokesman Hussam al-Shafi'i says that Ahrar al-Sham and Jund al-Aqsa have come to ceasefire: There is no ceasefire, and we don't accept Jund al-Aqsa's allegiance to Jahbat Fateh al-Sham and we won't stop until they (Jund al-Aqsa) are dismantled.

Ahrar al-Sham's deputy commander Abu Saleh Tahan says that Jund al-Aqsa's bay'ah (pledge of allegiance) w/ Jabhat Fateh al-Sham (ex-Nusra) was agreed that it would only be for the militants that did not fight (amongst Jund al-Aqsa); not the whole group. Essentially claiming that Jund al-Aqsa didn't join Jahbat Fateh al-Sham in its entirety.

Amaq Agency: Syrian regime forces sustain 16 deaths, in addition to the destruction of 2 tanks, during an attempt to advance on the Sawwanah hill in the Huwaysis area of the eastern countryside of Homs.

Some are spreading this fake statement around claiming it is a Jund al-Aqsa statement of them rejecting giving a bay'ah (pledge of allegiance) to Jabhat Fateh al-Sham and saying that they were not informed of giving it; however, the official Telegram channel of Jund al-Aqsa has confirmed that this statement is a fabrication.

As Ahrar al-Sham's military spokesman Abo Yusuf al-Muhajir claims they were not consulted about Jund al-Aqsa's bay'ah with Jabhat Fateh al-Sham (ex-Nusra) and that the fighting will continue w/ them, Ahmad Karali who is Ahrar al-Sham's official spokesperson also says that Ahrar al-Sham was not consulted about Jund al-Aqsa's bay'ah with JFS and that the fighting will continue w/ them.

Ahrar al-Sham spokesperson Abo Yusuf al-Muhajir says they don't accept Jund al-Aqsa's bay'ah (pledge of allegiance) to JFS (ex-Nusra) and wasn't informed of it and claims that the fighting will continue to the end.

Ahrar al-Sham and other rebel groups release a joint statement hinting at the end of infighting and calling on Jund al-Aqsa (who are now a part of Jahbat Fateh al-Sham) to openly denounce IS & hand over criminals to a shariah court.

Abu Yusuf al-Muhajir, who is Ahrar al-Sham's military spokesman tweets: Ahrar al-Sham has taken the decision to eliminate the subject of Jund al-Aqsa who spread corruption; those who talk about negotiations or agreements with Jund al-Aqsa do not represent Ahrar al-Sham. Jihad in Sham can't continue if any Dawaesh is present. The sword is better than negotiations & settlements.

Jund al-Aqsa released a 3rd statement claiming that Ahrar is refusing negotiations and settlements and calls for JFS (Nusra) to force Ahrar into one. They also say that those groups who sided with Ahrar al-Sham have been lied to and asks for them to not be deceived by the "oppressive group" (in reference to Ahrar al-Sham). Jund al-Aqsa also claims that Ahrar al-Sham is refusing every form of Islamic Shariah and that Jund al-Aqsa's priority is to come to a solution w/ all (rebel) parties so that much of the ground made by the rebels (including Jund, the FSA, and JaF) in Hama isn't lost, but if the situation demands it, Jund will defend themselves against Ahrar and co.