TE Chris ey lined up at fullback during one play on which the Redskins practiced third-and-1 situations. ey took the handoff and got a first down. We saw that last year in the Monday night game against Dallas, too.

ey’s versatility as a fullback is a significant asset in his push to make the team. If the Redskins keep one fullback, Darrel Young, ey could be the backup, just as Mike Sellers was last year. It gives ey an edge over all the other tight ends.

This is why I think we keep 4 TEs. ey is kind of in the role of Sellers for last year - the versatile guy. Don't know if he can keep his salary in this role.

TE Chris ey lined up at fullback during one play on which the Redskins practiced third-and-1 situations. ey took the handoff and got a first down. We saw that last year in the Monday night game against Dallas, too.

ey’s versatility as a fullback is a significant asset in his push to make the team. If the Redskins keep one fullback, Darrel Young, ey could be the backup, just as Mike Sellers was last year. It gives ey an edge over all the other tight ends.

This is why I think we keep 4 TEs. ey is kind of in the role of Sellers for last year - the versatile guy. Don't know if he can keep his salary in this role.

TE Chris ey lined up at fullback during one play on which the Redskins practiced third-and-1 situations. ey took the handoff and got a first down. We saw that last year in the Monday night game against Dallas, too.

ey’s versatility as a fullback is a significant asset in his push to make the team. If the Redskins keep one fullback, Darrel Young, ey could be the backup, just as Mike Sellers was last year. It gives ey an edge over all the other tight ends.

This is why I think we keep 4 TEs. ey is kind of in the role of Sellers for last year - the versatile guy. Don't know if he can keep his salary in this role.

Sellers was never a 60-70 catch guy, but Chris will be (AT WORST) a 60 catch guy if he plays all 16 games. He will have more catches than Paulsen, Paul, Armstrang, Banks, Austiin, and Robinson combined.

There is no eveidence that he will be anything other than a 60-80 catch guy. Everyone is ASSuming that he will have a significantly reduced role... he won't! He will prove, like he always has, that he is better than Davis and all but a few TEs in the NFL.

"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren

"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier

TE Chris ey lined up at fullback during one play on which the Redskins practiced third-and-1 situations. ey took the handoff and got a first down. We saw that last year in the Monday night game against Dallas, too.

ey’s versatility as a fullback is a significant asset in his push to make the team. If the Redskins keep one fullback, Darrel Young, ey could be the backup, just as Mike Sellers was last year. It gives ey an edge over all the other tight ends.

This is why I think we keep 4 TEs. ey is kind of in the role of Sellers for last year - the versatile guy. Don't know if he can keep his salary in this role.

Sellers was never a 60-70 catch guy, but Chris will be (AT WORST) a 60 catch guy if he plays all 16 games. He will have more catches than Paulsen, Paul, Armstrang, Banks, Austiin, and Robinson combined.

There is no eveidence that he will be anything other than a 60-80 catch guy. Everyone is ASSuming that he will have a significantly reduced role... he won't! He will prove, like he always has, that he is better than Davis and all but a few TEs in the NFL.

skinsfan#33 wrote: Sellers was never a 60-70 catch guy, but Chris will be (AT WORST) a 60 catch guy if he plays all 16 games. He will have more catches than Paulsen, Paul, Armstrong, Banks, Austiin, and Robinson combined.

There is no evidence that he will be anything other than a 60-80 catch guy. Everyone is ASSuming that he will have a significantly reduced role... he won't! He will prove, like he always has, that he is better than Davis and all but a few TEs in the NFL.

are you serious ... or a close relative

I'm a ey fan and I hope that he's able to show that he can still help the offense

AND

that he'll take less money

but ...

P A T I E N C E - Snyder needs to just 'butt out' and give Scot time to figure out who he needs in the FO, who he needs as the HC and what players fit what he thinks is a good system for this franchise - it's a mess & it will take time

TE Chris ey lined up at fullback during one play on which the Redskins practiced third-and-1 situations. ey took the handoff and got a first down. We saw that last year in the Monday night game against Dallas, too.

ey’s versatility as a fullback is a significant asset in his push to make the team. If the Redskins keep one fullback, Darrel Young, ey could be the backup, just as Mike Sellers was last year. It gives ey an edge over all the other tight ends.

This is why I think we keep 4 TEs. ey is kind of in the role of Sellers for last year - the versatile guy. Don't know if he can keep his salary in this role.

Sellers was never a 60-70 catch guy, but Chris will be (AT WORST) a 60 catch guy if he plays all 16 games. He will have more catches than Paulsen, Paul, Armstrang, Banks, Austiin, and Robinson combined.

There is no eveidence that he will be anything other than a 60-80 catch guy. Everyone is ASSuming that he will have a significantly reduced role... he won't! He will prove, like he always has, that he is better than Davis and all but a few TEs in the NFL.

Now, I am not saying that all of these guys will catch more footballs than ey. I am saying that there are no where near enough footballs to go around for ey to get 60 balls.

Exhibit 7: This isn't Gronk and Hernanez! Even with a healthy Davis and ey, the Skins have never successfully run the two TE set that everyone has talked about since they became teammates. The Two TE set will be Davis and Paul. That TE Tandem fits the Shanny O.

IMO The only way Paulsen makes the team is if ey doesn't. If ey doesn't make the team I don't see Morris not making it. With Hightower still limited I see him missing out regardless of ey, Paulsen or Morris

Red_One43 wrote:I am saying that there are no where near enough footballs to go around for ey to get 60 balls.

That's absurd. There's easily enough for ey to get 60 with the WRs getting theirs. The only player who might limit ey's catches is Fred Davis. IF ey can't get in the game, he can't catch the ball.

Oh, don't forget the backs getting theirs. Helu had, if not 50 catches, close to it.

So tell me how easily it is for a second string TE who is reportedly slower this year is going to get his 60.

Footballs to receivers, TEs, backs - Garcon? Davis? Moss? Morgan? Hank? How many footballs for the rest of them?

How may times to you think RGIII is going to crank it up next year?
Will Shanny finally emphasize the run which is his MO?
How effective will the offense control the ball? Are we with the Patriots in offensive plays/

Why did Shanny emphasize getting receiver in FA?
Why did Shanny switch Paul to TE?
Shanny is gearing up for Shanny ball this year.

Now, add all those balls up and the emphasis on the offense this year and tell how a second string TE/FB is going to get 60 catches.
Tel your rationale.

Here's the stats for the Redskins for the last two season to see how the has been distributed the last couple of years.

Red_One43 wrote:I am saying that there are no where near enough footballs to go around for ey to get 60 balls.

That's absurd. There's easily enough for ey to get 60 with the WRs getting theirs. The only player who might limit ey's catches is Fred Davis. IF ey can't get in the game, he can't catch the ball.

Oh, don't forget the backs getting theirs. Helu had, if not 50 catches, close to it.

So tell me how easily it is for a second string TE who is reportedly slower this year is going to get his 60.

Footballs to receivers, TEs, backs - Garcon? Davis? Moss? Morgan? Hank? How many footballs for the rest of them?

How may times to you think RGIII is going to crank it up next year?Will Shanny finally emphasize the run which is his MO?How effective will the offense control the ball? Are we with the Patriots in offensive plays/

Why did Shanny emphasize getting receiver in FA?Why did Shanny switch Paul to TE? Shanny is gearing up for Shanny ball this year.

Now, add all those balls up and the emphasis on the offense this year and tell how a second string TE/FB is going to get 60 catches.Tel your rationale.

Here's the stats for the Redskins for the last two season to see how the has been distributed the last couple of years.