Wednesday, August 19, 2009

In this post, I'm going to show how to build your Griffon apps with Gradle. Griffon already comes with a command line tool to build and interact with your app, so why would you want to do this? I can think of a few reasons:

you have an existing Gradle build you want to integrate with

you have a complex build or packaging scenario

you want to take advantage of Gradle's dependency management for your app

// add any dependencies you want downloaded as part of the bootstrap processdependencies { //compile 'com.google.collections:google-collections:1.0-rc2'}

// this should be run once for the projectcreateTask('bootstrap') << { // download any dependencies and put them in lib/ configurations['compile']?.files?.findAll { it.absolutePath.indexOf('unspecified') < 0 }.each { dep -> ant.copy(toDir: new File('lib'), file: dep) }

// if you want to use the gradle wrappercreateTask('wrapper', type: Wrapper).configure { gradleVersion = '0.7'}

To verify that everything is working, let's try running our app from Gradle (substitute gradle.bat if you are on Windows):gradle run-app

Your Griffon app should run. If it doesn't, try invoking the Gradle command with the '-i' flag:gradle -i run-appto see what the problem is.

Multi-project Builds

So far it may seem like "What's the point?" We could already run our Griffon app with the griffon command. Where Gradle really starts to shine is when you start wanting to perform complex builds, such as building multiple Griffon apps at once or integrating with an existing build.

Gradle has good support for multi-project builds. Assuming you are using a directory layout like this:

Building these multiple Griffon apps is as simple as listing them in the settings.gradle file:

include 'griffonapp1', 'griffonapp2'

Similarly, integrating with an existing build should be as simple as adding the name of your Griffon app to your existing settings.gradle file.

Complex Build/Packaging Scenarios

Griffon offers several packaging options with the Installer plugin. Sometimes you need more flexibility. For my PSICAT build, I wanted to package two Griffon apps together in a specific directory structure. The nice thing about Gradle build files is that they are just Groovy code and offer great integration with Ant. Below is a snippet from the PSICAT build that illustrates using Ant within Gradle:

One cool feature of Gradle is that you can generate a 'wrapper' script that will download and bootstrap Gradle itself so that developers who download your source don't have to have Gradle installed to build your project.

The build.gradle file above is already setup to create this wrapper. You simply have to run the command:

gradle wrapper

and it will create four files in your project:

gradle-wrapper.jargradle-wrapper.propertiesgradlewgradlew.bat

If you include these files when you send someone your project, they can use the gradlew or gradlew.bat scripts as if they had Gradle installed:

./gradlew run-app

The other neat trick with Gradle is you can use its ability to pull from Maven repositories to bootstrap the dependencies of your Griffon app. This means you don't need to send someone your Griffon app with a bunch of JARs in the lib directory. Instead you can send them a Gradle-ized version of your app and tell them to run the command:

./gradlew bootstrap

This will download all of the dependencies you've listed in the build.gradle file and put them in the lib directory of your Griffon app. Specifying dependencies is as simple as adding a few lines to the dependencies section of the build file:

Hopefully this has given you a taste of using Gradle with Griffon. Both are awesome tools that really show off the power of the Groovy language. If there's enough interest in using Gradle with Griffon, we can make build.gradle a standard artifact created by the griffon create-app task.

Saturday, August 15, 2009

I've been part of an interesting debate on the merits of Groovy via Twitter this week. I'm reproducing it here because I think it's an interesting take on what potential users feel are make or break issues for a language, and to give others who may not have seen it the chance to weigh in without the 140 character limit. :)

(Sorry in advance. Reproducing a Twitter convo in a blog is kind of hideous)

[@philswenson] if you want to know why groovy sucks, click here: http://pastie.org/583115[@joshareed] @philswenson It took me a second to diagnose your problem. Did you want Groovy to say: "Hey joker, actually import the classes you're using"[@joshareed] @philswenson Apparently Ruby has some magical mind-reading interpreter/compiler that saves you from yourself?

[@philswenson] @joshareed why the extra 500 lines of crap? in java or jruby that stacktrace would have been 1/50 the size. that's my point[@joshareed] @philswenson re: Java guess that's the trade off for Groovy dynamics. Ruby's (http://bit.ly/IagLJ) is not any better [Note: Nambu mangled the original link]

[@philswenson] @joshareed Ruby's stack dump = 67 lines. Groovy's = 222 lines. Not as different as I said, but still...[@joshareed] @philswenson # of lines doesn't matter when you see the cause of the prob in the first 10 lines, does it? You don't have to keep reading...[@joshareed] @philswenson and was the 67 vs 222 equivalent programs in each? I'd be interested in comparing the source of each

[@philswenson] @joshareed this was a case where the cause was obvious (it usually isn't). isn't groovy in large part about succinctness over java?[@joshareed] @philswenson how much time do you spend looking at stacktraces that this is hang up for you? Write a 3 line .findAll{} to filter traces[@joshareed] @philswenson and if you want to stick with stacktrace length as your argument then you won't be plain old Java traces with JRuby

From my perspective, this isn't a JRuby vs Groovy debate even though both languages were brought up in the conversation. Both are two different ways to skin a cat but they ultimately get you to the same place. Which you choose to use is more a matter of personal preference than the actual merits of the language.

What I'm more interested in is how important/serious is the stacktrace issue that Phil Swenson argues? I've been writing Groovy for a couple years now and can't remember (off the top of my head) a stacktrace from Groovy that was so confusing I couldn't figure out the problem. I'm sure there are some, especially when you start getting deep into the Groovy innards, but I'm guessing that's also the case with other languages on the JVM, like JRuby.

All dynamic languages built on the JVM introduce a certain level of indirection (by necessity), so are Groovy's stacktraces that much more hideous than JRuby's? What qualifies as hideous? I think length is a naive measure because the cause of the problem is likely to show up in the first dozen lines. Who cares if it goes on for another 200 lines? Length is also easily manipulated. You could write a simple findAll closure that sanitizes the stacktrace by removing all the lines that start with 'sun.reflect' or 'org.codehaus.groovy.runtime'. I have never once run into a problem that could be tracked to one of those lines in the stacktrace. So now does that make Groovy better than JRuby because the stacktrace is shorter?

I'm sure this is just a case of me being used to seeing Groovy stacktraces, so I'm used to feel of them and can quickly hone in on the cause of the problem. Likewise I'm sure Phil is used to [J]Ruby errors which probably look much different than Groovy's. I say probably because the two example put forth didn't look all that dissimilar IMO but were not from the same problem so it was an apples to oranges comparison.

Anyways, how important are stacktraces when making the decision to use a particular language? Are they important enough to declare one language's superiority over another? Are they worth focusing on to improve Groovy's ease-of-use?

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

Last week Andres Almiray and I released a new version of the Griffon Installer plugin. This version adds support for creating native Mac app bundles for your Griffon application, as well a few refactorings to make the generated artifacts more consistent. In this post, I'm going to walk you through the process of creating a set of native launchers for your application. A future post will explain the process of creating installers.

Getting started using the installer plugin is simple:griffon install-plugin installer

This will fetch the plugin and install it into your Griffon app. The plugin adds several new targets. All of the launcher-related targets are broken into two steps: a prepare step that copies all of the configuration files for that particular launcher into your application, and a create step that actually generates the native launcher. The prepare targets only need to be run once for your project. They give you a chance to tweak the launcher configuration files. The create targets are run every time you want to make a release.

The plugin provides launchers for the following platforms:

Linux

Mac

Windows

Executable Jar

The plugin also provides two other convenient targets, prepare-all-launchers and create-all-launchers which invoke the prepare- and create- targets for the four platforms above.

We'll use these convenience targets to create launchers for all platforms:griffon prepare-all-launchers

installer/jar/MANIFEST.MF - customize the manifest of the executable JAR

installer/jsmooth/$appName-icon.png - customize the .exe icon

installer/jsmooth/$appName.jsmooth - customize the .exe options

installer/mac/$appName.icns - customize the Mac icon

Once you are done customizing the configuration files, invoke thegriffon create-all-launchers target to actually create the launchers. This will create all of the launchers in the installer/$platform/dist directories and create archives of the launchers:

installer/jar/dist/$appName-$version.jar - the executable jar

installer/linux/dist/bin/$appName - the Linux launcher shell script

installer/linux/dist/$appName-linux-$version.zip - a zip of the Linux launcher

installer/mac/dist/$appName-$version.dmg - a disk image of the Mac launcher [only created if on a Mac]

installer/mac/dist/$appName.app - the Mac application bundle

installer/jsmooth/dist/$appName-windows-$version.zip - a zip of the Windows launcher

As you make changes to your code, simply invoke griffon create-all-launchers and your latest changes will be packaged up. If you increment the version number of your app, the created artifacts will be updated to match.

Hopefully the Installer plugin makes it easy to distribute your Griffon applications to users on various platforms. In a future blog post, I'll cover creating installers for when a simple zip file is not enough.