i`m usually very fair and ****.. no racist.. honestly.. skin colour means **** all to me...

BUT

Listening, watching and reading about all thats happening and seeing what all the black pple are doing is ****ing hell its like watching a cage of gorillas and monkeys....

It appears the majority of black pple want racists to exist... so they have a good excuse when they go into nigge r mode

Honestly they bring out the racist in your... the more i hear about all the **** that goes down, this event and others... if it wasnt for the dumbass phuking way of doing things, there would be a lot less racists around...

i`m usually very fair and ****.. no racist.. honestly.. skin colour means **** all to me...

BUT

Listening, watching and reading about all thats happening and seeing what all the black pple are doing is ****ing hell its like watching a cage of gorillas and monkeys....

It appears the majority of black pple want racists to exist... so they have a good excuse when they go into nigge r mode

Honestly they bring out the racist in your... the more i hear about all the **** that goes down, this event and others... if it wasnt for the dumbass phuking way of doing things, there would be a lot less racists around...

Holy fakk.. I was asking you what second the picture was in the video you imbecile. Thank god someone else with a functioning brain was able to answer 1:07.

Yeah because blood doesn't show on a grey shirt also.

#1. The caption on the pic explained it perfectly. You just had to read. So, you failed reading comprehension.
#2. You failed to communicate your question effectively. It was also hard for me to understand that you were so stupid you didn't understand.
#3 If his red jacket had been open and his grey shirt exposed to the blood it would have had blood on the grey shirt.

That is all very simple. So you fail both reading, communication and deductive reasoning.

Holy fakk.. I was asking you what second the picture was in the video you imbecile. Thank god someone else with a functioning brain was able to answer 1:07.

Yeah because blood doesn't show on a grey shirt also.

Yeah because he couldn't have used his hands to keep the blood off his shirt, he couldn't have used his fleece sleeve to try to stop the blood flow, he couldn't have had his fleece zipped up, they couldn't have cleaned him up before taking him in/putting him in their police vehicle, he couldn't have been taken to Macy's to buy a new red fleece because he wanted to look good for the cameras, ...

Rofl @ this. No. Just no. Just a human being with a functioning brain that wants to see him in court.

You are a liar. You don't want to see him in court. It's very clear by your statement you have your mind made up and want to see his "defenders" squirm. Do you also want to see his accusers squirm? If so THEN you truly want to see him have his day in court.

Right now you have your mind made up and you are just spouting the cliche's you think you should be. Simply put you are an intellectually bankrupt mindless sheep.

the phuck? Why the phuck did ABC plaster their phucking logo at the perfect height to cover up his head?

Why the phuck do you think. Pretty damn simple. No professional organization could make that mistake intentionally. I mean, seriously... obscuring out the primary point of interest in your shot! Whoever did that would be fired on the spot and the video would be re marked up and broadcast that day.

Why the phuck do you think. Pretty damn simple. No professional organization could make that mistake intentionally. I mean, seriously... obscuring out the primary point of interest in your shot! Whoever did that would be fired on the spot and the video would be re marked up and broadcast that day.

ABC has been on team Trayvon since day one.

sounds like you've been on team retard since day 1

count it.

Want to get Masters in Starcraft 2? Go to http://shokzguide.com/hg/?a=7Z6vhRZnF&p=2 . The only guide which guarantees a promotion and features GMs and pros giving in-depth strategic advice for all skill-levels.

Funny how nobody points out that it isn't a normal and healthy reaction to jump a neighborhood watch guy... there's clear evidence that he was seriously injured. Let's loot the mall tomorrow to protest crime.

#1. The caption on the pic explained it perfectly. You just had to read. So, you failed reading comprehension.
Caption on the pic did not identify what time the screenshot was taken from. So wrong.

#2. You failed to communicate your question effectively. It was also hard for me to understand that you were so stupid you didn't understand.I guess second is too hard for you to understand then.
#3 If his red jacket had been open and his grey shirt exposed to the blood it would have had blood on the grey shirt. Yes

That is all very simple. So you fail both reading, communication and deductive reasoning.

Originally Posted by CementPizza

You are a liar. You don't want to see him in court. It's very clear by your statement you have your mind made up and want to see his "defenders" squirm. Do you also want to see his accusers squirm? If so THEN you truly want to see him have his day in court.

Right now you have your mind made up and you are just spouting the cliche's you think you should be. Simply put you are an intellectually bankrupt mindless sheep.

And you know this how? I am fully prepared to accept Trayvon attacked him and he was just defending himself. As a whole, Zimmerman defenders are more idiotic/douchey than Trayvon supporters. Because of this it is funnier to watch them squirm.

Oh, so you don't agree with me so I'm "team retard". So anyone who doesn't see the world they way you see it is retarded right? You really think that?

There's a difference between disagreeing with me and being a deluded, willfully ignorant tool.

The evidence here is obvious. I enjoy watching people grasp at straws, though.

Want to get Masters in Starcraft 2? Go to http://shokzguide.com/hg/?a=7Z6vhRZnF&p=2 . The only guide which guarantees a promotion and features GMs and pros giving in-depth strategic advice for all skill-levels.

And you know this how? I am fully prepared to accept Trayvon attacked and he was just defending himself. As a whole, Zimmerman defenders are more idiotic/douchey than Trayvon supporters. Because of this it is funnier to watch them squirm.

So, you have nothing really to add to this entire thing other than to say that you think "Zimmerman supporters are more idiotic/douchey" so you want want to aggravate them for your own entertainment. So, this means you are directly exploiting Travon Martin's death for your entertainment.

Funny how nobody points out that it isn't a normal and healthy reaction to jump a neighborhood watch guy... there's clear evidence that he was seriously injured. Let's loot the mall tomorrow to protest crime.

What does this have to say about anything? Do you think anyone intelligent supports looting a mall? Stop judging a population by the actions of a few idiots.

So, you have nothing really to add to this entire thing other than to say that you think "Zimmerman supporters are more idiotic/douchey" so you want want to aggravate them for your own entertainment. So, this means you are directly exploiting Travon Martin's death for your entertainment.

There's a difference between disagreeing with me and being a deluded, willfully ignorant tool.

The evidence here is obvious. I enjoy watching people grasp at straws, though.

You have done nothing other than make ad hominem attacks. I am not deluded or willfully ignorant. Please point out exactly where I have been deluded. Please point out where I have been willfully ignorant.

You are just being sophomoric. (Look it up)
You don't have ANYTHING of substance to say. So you are just calling names and spouting catch phrases. I'm ready to hear the specific arguments you have about the case/incidnent AND specific evidence why those who disagree with you are deluded willfully or not. I DO expect a response.