IF CITIES CAN’T REGULATE URBAN GROWTH, WHO CAN? A RESEARCH PROPOSAL

In both Canada and the United States, we have largely left urban growth issues to local governments, and many local governments have failed to manage them. Many will never succeed because local councils are not, in general, able effectively to resist development interests.
As a result, the growth of our cities is, in practice, primarily responsive to the interests of developers. These interests are frequently at odds with the considerations that bear on preservation of the environment, maintenance of agriculture, an efficient infrastructure network and a transportation system that serves the population as a whole.
Therefore, in a series of posts on the multi-level governance of land use I’ve argued that:
• In urban growth policy, unlike many other policy domains, too much local control is a recipe for bad policy.

• This applies to major metropolitan areas and semi-rural, urbanizing communities alike.
• The reduction of local control over urban growth – in other words, centralization of power – is entirely justifiable because urban growth is every bit as much a national and global issue as it is a local one.
If local governments can’t control land use, the only alternative is a meaningful degree of land use regulation at another level of government. Despite a lot of loose talk in the literature about sprawl being a global phenomenon, Europe has, in general, been more successful at land use planning than North America, and, as I argued in the first of this series of posts, a major reason is that national land use regulations lay down rules that are not as easily revoked by the political clout of developers.
Centralized land use regulation along the lines of the British Planning Policy Guidance Notes and Statements, or the German Raumordnungsgesetz (see article by Andreas Schultze Baing, listed below), are not likely to be an option in North America, but there have been serious attempts at provincial or state government intervention, and this could be a reasonable substitute for European-style national planning. In addition, both senior levels of government can and do attack land use issues in a more piecemeal manner, through such measures as environmental regulations, or conditional funding of transportation facilities.
As a result of these reflections, I am hoping to fund a three-city, international comparative case study to take a closer look at the alternatives that might be available to governments wishing, at long last, to address the issue of urban growth in a serious way. The three cities I have chosen are Portland, Oregon; the Greater Toronto Area, and Hamburg. Here’s why:Portland. The best-known, and probably most vigorously pursued, senior-government intervention in the US is that of Oregon, which is usually identified with Portland’s growth boundary, but which in fact goes well beyond the establishment of an urban growth limit line, encompassing a panoply of rules governing urban growth and development. I learned a lot about how the Oregon system works when I did a case study of the politics of growth management in Portland in 1995, but since then there’s been a lot of water under Portland’s Burnside Bridge, so it’s time for another look.The Greater Toronto Area. In 2005, in Canada, Ontario legislated a greenbelt designed to hem in the expansion of the Greater Toronto Area, to preserve agriculture, and to conserve natural areas. In Toronto, meanwhile, a variety of measures have been undertaken to promote densification of the city; the reversal of some of the separation of residential from commercial development that has been such a troubled legacy of modernist planning; and the development of the transit system. In practice, therefore, the Greater Toronto Area is governed by a growth management regime that has much in common with Oregon’s system.Hamburg. The European case in my three-city comparison will be Hamburg, which I have chosen because it exhibits some of the complexities that have made growth management in North American metropolitan regions complicated: multiple municipalities, sprawling across three Länder: Hamburg itself, Schleswig-Holstein and Lower Saxony.
A systematic comparison of how the growth of cities is managed, considering both political and administrative dimensions of the problem, in Europe, in the Greater Toronto Area and in Portland should make it possible to gain an overview of problems and possible solutions to them.
Specifically, the objective of my research will be a cross-national comparison of different systems of land use regulation. The topic is potentially vast, so it is very important to limit the research in such a way as to keep it manageable and truly comparative. At the same time it has to be broad enough to permit a meaningful look at the question of whether growth is being managed effectively. I propose the following research questions, one of which bears on procedure, with the other two addressing results:
1. What political and administrative steps are taken, and what rules are applied, in deciding on the location and structure of new subdivisions?
2. What is the condition of infrastructure (roads, public transportation facilities and underground municipal services) throughout the urban area?
3. How well-served by public transit is the urban area?
Answers to these questions, with all the complexities they will bring to the surface, should provide a reasonable test of the effectiveness of growth management in these three regions. At the same time they will provide insights into the political, administrative, and regulatory sources of success and failure.
••••••••••••••
A brief, useful comparison of British and German land use regulatory regimes can be found in:
Andreas Schultze Baing, “Containing Urban Sprawl? Comparing Brownfield Reuse Policies in England and Germany”. International Planning Studies 15 (1), 25–35.
The article in which I originally argued that centralized city planning reduces the clout of developers is:
Christopher Leo, “City Politics in an Era of Globalization.” In Mickey Lauria, ed. Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Local Government in a Global Economy. Sage, 1997, 77-98.
The major publication recording the results of my 1995 research in Portland, Oregon, was:LEO, C. (1998). REGIONAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT REGIME: The Case of Portland, Oregon Journal of Urban Affairs, 20 (4), 363-394 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.1998.tb00428.x
Here are some other articles I have published on multi-level governance:
Christopher Leo, “Deep Federalism: Respecting Community Difference in National Policy”. Canadian Journal of Political Science 39:3, 2006, 481-506.
Christopher Leo and Katie Anderson, “Being Realistic about Urban Growth.” Journal of Urban Affairs. 28:2, 2006, 169-89.
Christopher Leo and Martine August, “National Policy and Community Initiative: Mismanaging Homelessness in a Slow Growth City.” Canadian Journal of Urban Research 15 (1) (supplement) 2006, pp. 1-21.
Christopher Leo and Mike Pyl, “Multi-level Governance: Getting the Job Done and Respecting Community Difference.” Canadian Political Science Review, 1 (2) 2007, September. Accessable at http://ojs.unbc.ca/index.php/cpsr/issue/view/2/showToc.
Christopher Leo and Todd Andres, “Unbundling Sovereignty in Winnipeg: Federalism through Local Initiative.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 41 (1) 2008, pp. 93-117.
Christopher Leo and Martine August, “The Multi-Level Governance of Immigration and Settlement: Making Deep Federalism Work.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 42 (2), 2009, pp. 491-510.
Christopher Leo and Jeremy Enns, “Multi-level governance and ideological rigidity: The failure of deep federalism. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 42 (1), 2009.
Richard Lennon and Christopher Leo, “Metropolitan Growth and Municipal Boundaries: Problems and Proposed Solutions.” International Journal of Canadian Studies, 24 (Fall), 2001, 77-104.
Christopher Leo and Wilson Brown, “Slow Growth and Urban Development Policy.” Journal of Urban Affairs, 22 (2), 2000, 193-213.
Christopher Leo, with Mary Ann Beavis, Andrew Carver and Robyne Turner, “Is Urban Sprawl Back on the Political Agenda? Local Growth Control, Regional Growth Management and Politics.” Urban Affairs Review, 34 (2) 1998, 179-212.
Christopher Leo, “Global Change and Local Politics: Economic Decline and the Local Regime in Edmonton.” Journal of Urban Affairs, 17 (3), 1995, 277-99.
Christopher Leo and Robert Fenton, “‘Mediated Enforcement’ and the Evolution of the State: Development Corporations in Canadian City Centres”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 14 (2) 1990, 185-206.

7 January 2018
I thought my former home, the US, had hit rock bottom when President Nixon’s credibility was so low that he felt the need to proclaim ”I’m not a crook.” What am I to think when President Trump has to reassure the public he’s not mentally unbalanced?

13 November 2017 Although most of us shop at the likes of Walmart and Costco by necessity, I prefer to shop at small, local businesses. If you feel the way I do, click here for a quick rundown on the reasons why small business is good for the community and a succinct list of policies to support it.

6 September 2017
Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau has given up on proportional representation. Have you? Want to know more about it? This article from a US environmental advocacy group provides clear explanations of my favourite PR system and links to a wealth of supplementary material.

31 August 2017
Why did the word “monopoly”, referring to big business, fall out of fashion? Should it have?

15 May 2017
Will “ride-sharing” services like Uber promote road-pricing and strengthen public transportation in North American cities? Possibly, but, any way you slice it, they’re cheap labour. Dark times for cabbies.

23 January 2017
How Vancouver became North America’s car-free capital: A really well-done short video, informative viewing for anyone with an interest in cities. Click to start video, click again for full screen.

6 May 2016
Low oil prices are supposed to stimulate economic growth. Instead, we have cheap oil and economic stagnation. In the kind of research-rich journalism we need a lot more of, Andrew Nikiforuk calls this situation a “civilization shrinker”.

15 April 2016Click to enlarge
What you need to know about Hyperloop a radical new passenger and freight transportation technology that has some heavyweight backers. It’ll be interesting to see if anything comes of it.

19 February 2016
The biggest blind spot of urban greens: zoning. The argument this article makes refers to Cascadia, but it applies equally to the rest of Canada and the U.S.

15 February 2016
With governments preparing to regulate driverless cars, they’re on the way to becoming a social, economic, and legal reality — but they leave us with a host of question marks. Here’s a brief overview of the issues we face.

8 January 2016
If you’ve been hearing about the armed occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon, and you’re tempted to think Americans are all crazy, you might be interested in a view from the Oregon mainstream.

30 December 2015Fight for $15 We live in the wealthiest society in world history. When are we going to admit to ourselves that some hard-working people, living amid that wealth, can’t feed their families?

28 December 2015
Bad street design kills people. The bad design referred to is the kind most often recommended by traffic engineers. Click on the links in the article for good supporting data.

25 December 2015
A short history of global emissions from fossil fuel burning: A fascinating video that uses an animated map of the world to show how the causes of global warming have proliferated in Europe, the Americas and Asia.

23 December 2015
When you shop at Amazon, you’re not getting as big a bargain as you think. Here’s an infographic account of the real costs.

13 December 2015
Grappling with homelessness: Portland, Oregon follows Los Angeles, Seattle and Hawaii in declaring a homelessness emergency. Some time ago, a Canadian source pointed to problems of the vulnerably housed.

29 October 2015
Minimum wages in many countries look a little bit better when purchasing power is taken into account, but they’re still egregiously low. A table near the end of this article summarises the data.

28 August 2015
Our ancestors:Click to enlarge photo
A statue in Portsmouth, England, commemorating the many emigrants who left Portsmouth and Southhampton to start new lives in North America. By extension, they represent the ancestries of most North Americans, who arrived here after taking a leap in the dark.

7 June 2015
This place matters: The US National Trust for Historic Preservation has launched an ingenious campaign, using social media to get people involved in identifying places that matter to them.Click on picture
Here’s a place that matters to Winnipeg: The Forks, commemorating the centuries during which the confluence of the Red and Assiniboine has been a meeting-place and marking the point at which Winnipeg stopped turning its back on the rivers.

3 May 2015
Toronto, which has Canada’s highest rate of working poverty, has also reversed the time honoured North American pattern of suburban affluence and inner-city decay. In the Toronto region, poverty is worst in the suburbs. For details click here and here and here.

12 April 2015
Large-scale production of public utilities and centralised sanitation networks made the modern city as we know it. Are we now starting to shift toward more localized production of the services we all need? A clear, succinct, scholarly assessment.

29 March 2015
Everyone wants to be the new Dubai. So far, Belgrade, Serbia; Machakos, a largely rural area in Kenya, and Edmonton (Alberta, Canada) have jumped on the bandwagon. Who’s driving it, and what do they stand to gain?

23 January 2015
Designing roads for a higher “level of service” isn’t about safety. Click here for a thoughtful comment about what it takes to make streets really safe.

22 January 2015
In terms of income inequality, New York resembles Swaziland, Chicago is comparable to El Salvador, and San Francisco to Madagascar. Look for that and more about inequality here.

19 January 2015Click on picture
Don’t try to tell a German bureaucrat that brevity is the soul of wit. Translation of the sign: “No parking motor vehicles or bicycles. Violators will be towed at owner’s expense.”

8 December 2014
Know anyone on Winnipeg City Council who relies on council salary for income? Tell your councillor you support the city’s existing provisions for a modest severance allowance to keep her/him going while looking for another job — or prepare for a council of developers, well-off lawyers and business people.

4 December 2014Cutbacks, cutbacks, cutbacks: We North Americans and west Europeans live in the wealthiest society in world history. Why is so much of our politics about cutbacks? (If you see ads when you click, scroll down.)

28 November 2014
Despite some progress toward gender equality, women still suffer disproportionately from poverty, violence, inadequate housing, and a long list of other ills. Look up chapter and verse here.

20 October 2014Data vacuum makes it hard to track poverty. Is this the real reason for the Harper government’s cancellation of the long-form census? (If you don’t have information about them, you may not have to help them.)

11 August 20Click on pictureThis riveting video tells the story of Bete Desta, a Winnipeg-based aid organization that helps orphans and poor children in Korem, Ethiopia, while keeping them at home. To contribute, call 204-997-5358 or 204-334-0322.

24 July 2014Click to see the whole picture
Winnipeg signals its dislike of cyclists: In English, the sign implies they’re trying to deny cars the right to use the street. In French the implication is that bicycles aren’t vehicles. (Judging by behaviour, some drivers think of them as toys that shouldn’t be on the street.)

1 May 2014
An opera about Robert Moses, the controversial city builder, and Jane Jacobs, who fought him to a standstill over plans for a freeway across Lower Manhattan. Read this article and follow the links.

For an example of the good results that the federal-provincial immigration and settlement program achieved, take a look at this study. (To skip the theoretical genuflections, start with the last paragraph on p. 494.)

14 April 2014
For the remarkable story of a reclusive, talented artist who took riveting pictures of life on the streets of Chicago while making her living as a nanny, click here.

3 February 2014
Financial journalists failed to connect dots, and, in 2008, left abusive, reckless, and criminal corporations free to drag the global economy into the abyss, says the author of The Watchdog that Didn’t Bark.