On Jan 18, 2004, at 19:23, Bryce Benton wrote:
> What about this line:
> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/xml; charset=iso-8859-1"
> />
>
> Is "text/xml" what I should use?
No. Since you are writing in XHTML you should use the proper MIME type,
which is "application/xhtml+xml":-
<http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/>
The problem with this is that some browsers (Internet Explorer for
Windows, chiefly) don't recognize it, so you would have to have some
server-side script to filter IE & friends and send
application/xhtml+xml as per the spec to the ones who do understand it.
Also, I don't think it's a good practice to specify the MIME type in a
meta http-equiv header. I reckon you would be better off sending that
with the HTTP headers.
> Should I change the charset to utf8?
Only if you plan to have UTF-8 content in these pages. Recently I tend
to prefer using UTF-8 myself but the author has to have extra care when
editing documents with this encoding so it might not be worth the
hassle for you.
> If you have any suggestions, complaints, or accolades for the website
> let me know.
You've done a good work, and you did it quickly. Keep that up :-)
Cheers.
--
@prefix foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> .
<#me> a foaf:Person ; foaf:name "Antonio Cavedoni" ;
foaf:weblog <http://cavedoni.com/blogorroico/> .
==================================
This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History
Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net.
Subscribe Instructions
To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: subscribe
Unsubscribe Instructions
To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: unsubscribe
Help
To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: help