I dunno what it says about me that my response for most of EP. 20 was sort of a bemused "Huh, people are weird." I think it was that the computer voices gave me some distance from what they were talking about.

However, the bemusement definitely faded toward the end when the pictures that were found were described. And the reminders that this dude spent a lot of time with children, inviting them into his house and driving them around.

I'm still torn on this. I've listened to a handful of episodes and they're all consistently riveting and well-produced. I especially love his use of music. There are times when I think the show would benefit from tighter editing. A few of the clips, phone calls and interviews tend to drag on and on.

But I still question the overall intent. If the idea is "bad guys are all around us" well okay, sure. I'm interested in what you guys think the point of this show is, beyond satisfying our seemingly insatiable thirst for true crime and serial killer stories. Some episodes are so gratuitous they're almost snuff films in podcast form.

I'm still torn on this. I've listened to a handful of episodes and they're all consistently riveting and well-produced. I especially love his use of music. There are times when I think the show would benefit from tighter editing. A few of the clips, phone calls and interviews tend to drag on and on.

But I still question the overall intent. If the idea is "bad guys are all around us" well okay, sure. I'm interested in what you guys think the point of this show is, beyond satisfying our seemingly insatiable thirst for true crime and serial killer stories. Some episodes are so gratuitous they're almost snuff films in podcast form.

I know what you're getting at. There are a few moments where I think he goes a bit too far, where he sinks into the depravity of the stories maybe a little too much, where I can see someone viewing it as a kind of enthusiasm. But I absolutely believe that the intent is to elicit horror. And to inspire disgust in the face of evil.

Perhaps we don't always need that extra push, but it's there for those who might. As I said before: Mike's voice is there to recenter the listener, to remind you that you live in moral universe. The way he tells these stories (with shocking detail and an editorial voice), in direct contrast to some other mediums, seems to completely disallow any sort of enchantment with violence and death. He skips right past that and goes right for horror and disgust. I think it works.

That largely seems to be the intent of this project. But you can also tell that he's grappling with causes. There's extensive coverage of schizophrenia, psychopathy, and mental illness in general. He also covers how problematic our solutions can be; there's a whole episode about the insanity of the prison system, and one about lethal injection. I think Mike is inspired by genuine moral outrage, about those things, and particularly about murderers who seem to have gotten away with it.

New episode today. There is audio of a murder at the end, specifically of the victim suffering, which is horrifying and goes on way too long. I had to turn it down, so I didn't even hear all of it. Let's just say there was moaning and gurgling. I would probably be scarred for a while had I kept listening. I honestly don't think I can recommend this podcast anymore, unless he stops with this kind of thing.

It's a shame, because the rest of the episode was absolutely great and fascinating. (If you want, you can safely listen and just turn it off when he mentions a video being posted on Facebook, which is after the discussion of 2 Girls 1 Cup.)

Yes and no. Again, my problem stems from the host and the writing. It delves into the details of disturbing crimes, but there's always some narration about "pure evil" or something like that. (I'm thinking in particular about episode 15). It's a very awkward mix of detailed reporting and sensationalism. I'm not trying to justify these horrible crimes, but I just wish the host was less, well, excited about outing these "monsters."

I just listened to episode 15 and I couldn't agree more. I found it kind of appalling honestly. He has a very unpleasant, moralistic, simplified look on things where these murderers are 'monsters' committing acts of 'pure evil', like they crawled out of some netherworld, and all we can do is lock ourselves up to avoid them, or call them scum. No, i'm not defending the awful crimes, but to understand and prevent these things from happening, you have to attempt to empathise with the person who committed them. Immorality is not born in a vacuum, these stories are so frightening (and fascinating) not because they are monsters, but because they are human beings and we wonder whether if circumstances had been different for us, could we be capable of the same acts?

But no, he wants to berate a police interrogator for being too kind to this monster, apparently.

At one point the murderer mentions something about not going to Thanksgiving dinner because he feels anxious around large crowds, and the twat of a host interjects with '...classic loner psychopath.' No, that's classic agoraphobia, which is not synonymous with psychopathy. Remotely. I swear this guy is one step away from classifying introversion as a classic psychopathic trait. It's irresponsible and mean-spirited to blur the lines between mental illness/eccentricity and being a murderer. Who is this guy? Does he have a degree in criminal psychology? At another point he ...basically mocks the murderer because he lives alone with his mother, again, as if this act in itself is deplorable or suspicious. That's not unusual! In fact it's a kind of commendable societal norm for anyone below a certain economic position but he still finds a way to turn it into some sort of telltale sign of EVILLLLLLLLL like it's a 666 birthmark or something.

I don't know. There's stuff to like in there for sure, the raw material is fascinating. But the way it's presented just kind of sickens me. It's tapping into that kind of insular American culture of fear, that you should be suspicious of the man with a stutter next to you on the bus cause he might stab your dog. Associating any mental illness with these terrible crimes so breezily isn't just fucking lazy and stupid, it's socially irresponsible. It perpetuates and exacerbates the problem.

Those particular interjections from Episode 15 did bother me, for the exact reasons Garam describes... I think I was so enthralled and disturbed by the meat of the content that I chose to ignore them.

This goes to the thing he says at the top of each episode: "Sword and Scale... the show that proves that the worst monsters are real." Once Mike has decided that one of the killers is an irredeemable monster, the worst of the worst, he likes to freely express his disgust. I still think this is (mostly) true:

Those interjections seem to function as moments of grounding... He expresses his disgust almost to recenter the listener, to remind you that you live in a world of real human values, and to prevent you from falling under the spell of whatever psychopath is speaking. That's how it works for me I guess.

There are a few moments where I think he goes a bit too far, where he sinks into the depravity of the stories maybe a little too much, where I can see someone viewing it as a kind of enthusiasm . . . The way he tells these stories (with shocking detail and an editorial voice), in direct contrast to some other mediums, seems to completely disallow any sort of enchantment with violence and death. He skips right past that and goes right for horror and disgust.

It's strange. I do think Mike's editorializing prevents the listener from getting too fascinated with death, channeling all of that into horror and disgust. But at certain points, it goes past that and circles back around to an unhealthy and sensationalistic fascination with death.

Garam, in the most recent episode, he does suggest that the abuse Luka Magnotta suffered as a child could be what messed him up. So there is some of that... perhaps not enough. He does seem to believe that once one has become a murderous monster, there's no coming back from that. The apparent lack of remorse in his subjects seems to support that, but maybe it is too simplified.

I take the moralizing and editorializing in stride. What really bothers me about the podcast, and what leads me to not recommend it, is the sensationalism. There is an undercurrent of fearmongering that I am not okay with, and which became more apparent once I got caught up on most of the episodes. In one episode he muses on the randomness of who ends up being a murderer and asks (in a spooky voice) if your neighbor could be one of them. I don't think I've ever rolled my eyes harder.

And there are two or three moments of totally unnecessary gratuity that are there only to shock — the most unredeemable one, as I described, from the end of the last episode.

Hmm, well, after all my recent complaining about this show here and in the shoutbox... this latest episode is probably one of the best ever. Don't get me wrong, it's a very disturbing and very sad episode, but it's controlled and surprisingly humane. I have to assume that Mike has taken a lot of the negative feedback from his last episode to heart.

It's the part 2 to last week's part 1. There is no audio of murder in this one, thank God. Luka Magnotta posted a snuff film online, and we hear audio from "reaction videos" where idiots who've chosen to watch this thing describe what they're seeing and express their horror. The only thing audible from the original recording is the new wave song that Luka ironically provided for its soundtrack. This is all quite disturbing and affecting, but nothing like actually hearing a murder victim suffering.

It's a shame, without that clip at the end of the previous episode, this 2-parter would probably be the best thing Sword and Scale has ever produced.

Also, apparently he took the name Magnotta from a video game about a serial killer. In the game, Detective Magnotta is one of the potential killers, depending on which path the player chooses. Pretty crazy that he chose that name so far in advance of the actual murder(s). (source)

The latest episode (#49) about Dee Dee and Gypsy Blancharde is endlessly fascinating. And not gruesome. Highly recommended. This is also a current news story. I would elaborate, but there are some things I don't want to spoil.