Unique Statistics:

open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

Abstract

Here we describe diffractive measurements at RHIC in proton+proton collisions with a special optics run of β*~21 m at STAR, at the center-of-mass energy s=200 GeV during the the RHIC 2009 run. We present published results of single spin asymmetry as well as preliminary results on double spin asymmetries and central exclusive production.

1. INTRODUCTION AND THEORETICAL FORMALISM

Elastic scattering of polarized protons at small four momentum transfer squared
is described by interference of Coulomb and nuclear amplitudes. Coulomb amplitude is calculable by QED and such interference provides a unique opportunity to study the dynamics of the strong interaction in the nonperturbative region. The total cross section was measured to very high energy and turned out to be in a good agreement with the description by the Regge pole exchange. At ultra relativistic energies the main contribution comes from Pomeron or, in modern terms, multigluon exchange [1]. Most of the previous experiments were done with unpolarized beams and targets. The first measurement with polarized protons at high energies in the Coulomb nuclear interference (CNI) region
GeV) was done in E704 experiment [2] with moderate precision. RHIC with its polarized beams [3] published a number of accurate measurements with
GeV [4, 5] a few years ago. But only one measurement with a limited statistics exists so far in the collider energy range [6].

Elastic scattering of two identical particles with spin
is described by 5 helicity amplitudes [7, 8]. Two amplitudes
and
produce no spin-flip, two other
and
produce double spin-flip and the last
produces single spin-flip. Each of the amplitudes can be written as a sum of hadronic and Coulomb amplitudes
. Electromagnetic part is calculable from QED. It is believed that the main hadronic contribution to the cross section comes from non-flipping amplitudes so the optical theorem could be written as
. Other hadron amplitudes are expected to be small and are parametrized in terms of
:

(1)

The differential cross section and asymmetries can be written in terms of the amplitudes:

(2)

(3)

(4)

where
is the single spin asymmetry and
and
are the double spin asymmetries.

2. EXPERIMENT

Layout of the setup for small-t measurements with the STAR detector (in the center).

Protons scattered at very small angles at the interaction point (IP) travel inside the beam pipe until they reach the Roman Pot (RP) detectors located in the RHIC tunnel on both sides of the STAR detector. Each RP contains four silicon microstrip detectors and a trigger scintillation counter. During the 2009 run, we were able to insert RP detectors to be as close as about 12
(
being the beam size) or 10 mm from the center of the beam pipe. Two RP's with detectors inserted horizontally (at 55.5 m from IP) and another two RP's vertically (at 58.5 m) were used at each side of IP. More details of the detectors can be found in [9]. The coordinates measured by the detectors relate to the scattering angles at IP by the transport matrix:

(5)

where index
denotes a particular Roman Pot. The
at STAR during our special run was about 21 m and the RP's were positioned to give us a parallel-to-point focusing optics. As a result, the error introduced by unknown position of the interaction point was minimal. More details on the detector layout, alignment and performance can be found at [10].

3. ANALYSIS

Elastically triggered events were selected for reconstructions and the cuts are briefly described below.

(A) Clusters of consecutive strips with charge values above
from their pedestals were found. We ignore rare clusters larger then 5 strips, because there were a lot of noise among them.

(B) A threshold depending on the cluster width was applied to the total charge of each cluster. This gave us better signal to noise ratio for clusters of 3 and 4 strips. After these cuts we had individual plane efficiencies above 99%.

Clusters in the planes of the same orientation (horizontal/x or vertical/y) within the same RP were merged and we required that their coordinates were within 200 µ (2 strips) from each other.

(C) Clusters in the planes of the same orientation (horizontal/x or vertical/y) within the same RP were merged and we required that their coordinates were within 200
(2 strips) from each other.

(D) Clusters in x and y orientations form a track and opposite pairs of tracks formed from each side of the IP were chosen.

(E) Transport equation (5) was solved for each side.

(F) The strongest criteria of elastic events selection is the collinearity cut which was realized by requiring
, where
and
and
are typically
58µ rad, to be <9. The correlation between the angles can be seen in Fig. (2).

Fig.(2).

(color online) Distribution of δθ y vs δθ x for both detector pairs in horizontal RPs (a) and their projections in δθ y (b) and δθ x (c). The overlaid curves represent the fits with a Gaussian signal and a linear background. The σ values of distributions are ≈ 58 μ rad, consistent with beam angular divergence, and the background-to-signal ratio under the Gaussian distributions in ±3 σ is ≈ 0.4%.

About 21 millions events out of about 33 million elastic triggers written during the run were selected for asymmetry calculations.

Using the square root formula [6, 11], raw asymmetry as function of azimuthal angle
for only
and
bunch polarizations can be written as:

(6)

where
,
- number of events with bunch polarization pattern
at the azimuthal angle
.
are polarizations of the blue and yellow beams, measured by HJET and pCarbon polarimeters [12]. The polarization values averaged for the time of our data taking were:
,
and
(errors shown here include global systematic uncertainties). From double spin asymmetries measured by [6], we know that
is less than 0.01. Using other different bunch polarization combinations, other raw asymmetries can be introduced similarly to (6); particularly, the so-called “wrong combination” is shown here:

(7)

The results of
for 5
-intervals and
for the whole
-range are presented in Fig. (3).

Double spin raw asymmetries
and
can be extracted from the following equation (as there is no square root formula available):

(8)

Here
are relative luminosity monitors for the corresponding polarization pattern.

4. RESULTS ON ELASTIC SCATTERING MEASUREMENTS

The recently published results [13] on the single spin asymmetry are shown in Fig. (4)

Fig.(4).

(color online) The measured single spin asymmetry AN for five −t intervals. Vertical error bars show statistical uncertainties. Statistical error bars in −t are smaller than the plot symbols. The dashed curve corresponds to theoretical calculations without hadronic spin-flip and the solid one represents the r5 fit.

Fig.(5).

(color online) Fitted value of r5 with contours corresponding to statistical error only (solid ellipse and cross) and statistical+systematic errors (dashed ellipse and cross) of 1σ.

in comparison with theoretical curve without hadron spin-flip and with the best fit allowing non-zero hadronic spin-flip (see [14] for formula). Only statistical uncertainties have been included. The value of
resulting from the fit described above is shown in Fig. (5), together with both statistical and systematic uncertainties. The obtained values Re
= 0.0017
0.0063 and Im
= 0.007
0.057 are consistent with the hypothesis of no hadronic spin-flip contribution (
) at the energy of this experiment. That is, only Pomeron exchange, which contributes only to spin non-flipping amplitudes
and
, seems to survive at high energies.

The preliminary results on double spin raw asymmetries are shown in Fig. (6).

Though some effects of the order of
could be seen, they are small. Here we have used relative luminosities obtained from counts of inelastic triggers produced by the vertex position detector and beam-beam counters (BBC). However, after more thorough studies, BBC coincidence counts were proved to be the least sensitive to double spin effects with negligible statistical uncertainty. The systematic error due to the normalization uncertainty of BBC coincidence counts on
is at the level of
.

5. CENTRAL EXCLUSIVE PRODUCTION

We have also studied the invariant mass spectrum of the two oppositely charged pions produced in the Ce ntral Exclusive Production process of
. Our ability to tag protons in the Roman Pots on opposite sides of the IP helps reduce background in this measurement of double Pomeron exchange compared to standard hadronic production processes. Pions were obtained from tracks with dE/dx identification. It is also required that the protons be non-collinear with scattering angle separation more than 0.15 mrad to avoid cosmics. Moreover, the missing transverse momentum of the final states two pions and two protons) had to be less than 0.02 GeV.

pairs produced with the above cuts is presented. The like-sign background is very small, which gives a measure of exclusiveness of the process. The spectrum is not corrected for acceptance, but preliminary acceptance study indicates that corrections would not change shape of the spectrum significantly. Presented spectrum is similar to the one published by the AFS Collaboration at ISR [15] as it shows the same characteristic features :

• it is dominated by low invariant mass pairs,
, below 1 GeV;

• it shows the same characteristic drop around 1 GeV which may be due to
rescattering or
(980) interference with the S-wave background [16].

6. SUMMARY AND FUTURE PROSPECTS

We had a very successful run with the physics program with tagged forward protons at RHIC in 2009, in which over 70 million events (including 33 million events with elastic triggers) were collected. We have published our results on single spin asymmetry (ANand r5) and we are finalizing our results on double spin asymmetries as well as the central exclusive production. In the mean time, we are also preparing for the Phase II of this physics program, in which we change our detector configurations so that we will not need a special optics of RHIC and thus this physics program can be carried out simultaneously with other physics programs of the STAR experiment. This will allow us to take much more data and explore other physics possibilities at RHIC.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author confirms that this article content has no conflicts of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the RHIC Operations Group and RCF at BNL, the NERSC Center at LBNL, the KISTI Center in Korea and the Open Science Grid consortium for providing resources and support. This work was supported in part by the Offices of NP and HEP within the U.S. DOE Office of Science, the U.S. NSF, CNRS/IN2P3, FAPESP CNPq of Brazil, Ministry of Ed. and Sci. of the Russian Federation, NNSFC, CAS, MoST and MoE of China, the Korean Research Foundation, GA and MSMT of the Czech Republic, FIAS of Germany, DAE, DST, and CSIR of India, National Science Centre of Poland, National Research Foundation (NRF-2012004024), Ministry of Sci., Ed. and Sports of the Rep. of Croatia, and RosAtom of Russia.

Indexing Agencies

Press Release

Join Our Editorial Board

News release date: March 29, 2018

Description:

Open Physics Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews, letters, case reports and guest-edited single topic issues in all areas of physics. Bentham Open ensures speedy peer review process and accepted papers are published within 2 weeks of final acceptance.

Open Physics Journal is committed to ensuring high quality of research published. We believe that a dedicated and committed team of editors and reviewers make it possible to ensure the quality of the research papers. The overall standing of a journal is in a way, reflective of the quality of its Editor(s) and Editorial Board and its members.

Open Physics Journal is seeking energetic and qualified researchers to join its editorial board team as Editorial Board Members or reviewers.

The essential criteria to become Editorial Board Members of Open Physics Journal are as follows:

Experience in physics with an academic degree.

At least 20 publication records of articles and /or books related to the field of physics or in a specific research field.

Proficiency in English language.

The Roles of Editorial Board Member are to:

Offer advice on journals’ policy and scope.

Submit or solicit at least one article for the journal annually.

Contribute and/or solicit Guest Edited thematic issues to the journal in a hot area (at least one thematic issue every two years).

Peer-review of articles for the journal, which are in the area of expertise (2 to 3 times per year).

If you are interested in becoming our Editorial Board member, please submit the following information to info@benthamopen.com. We will respond to your inquiry shortly.

Email subject: Editorial Board Member Application

Your name

Email address

Telephone

City, State, Country

Name of your institution

Department or Division

Website of institution

Your title or position

Your highest degree

Complete list of publications and h-index

Interested field(s)

Waiver of Open Access Fees for Several Open Access Journals (Offer valid until June 30, 2018)

News release date: April 11, 2018

Description:

All articles would be published FREE of all open access fees if submitted by June 30th, 2018 in The Open Physics Journal.

Testimonials

"Open access will revolutionize 21st century knowledge work and accelerate the diffusion of ideas and evidence that support just in time learning and the evolution of thinking in a number of disciplines."

. —Daniel Pesut. (Indiana University School of Nursing, USA).

"It is important that students and researchers from all over the world can have easy access to relevant, high-standard and timely scientific information. This is exactly what Open Access Journals provide and this is the reason why I support this endeavor."

"Publishing research articles is the key for future scientific progress. Open Access publishing is therefore of utmost importance for wider dissemination of information, and will help serving the best interest of the scientific community."

. —Patrice Talaga. (UCB S.A., Belgium).

"Open access journals are a novel concept in the medical literature. They offer accessible information to a wide variety of individuals, including physicians, medical students, clinical investigators, and the general public. They are an outstanding source of medical and scientific information."

. —Jeffrey M. Weinberg. (St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, USA).

"Open access journals are extremely useful for graduate students, investigators and all other interested persons to read important scientific articles and subscribe scientific journals. Indeed, the research articles span a wide range of area and of high quality. This is specially a must for researchers belonging to institutions with limited library facility and funding to subscribe scientific journals."

. —Debomoy K. Lahiri. (Indiana University School of Medicine, USA).

"Open access journals represent a major break-through in publishing. They provide easy access to the latest research on a wide variety of issues. Relevant and timely articles are made available in a fraction of the time taken by more conventional publishers. Articles are of uniformly high quality and written by the world's leading authorities."

. —Robert Looney. (Naval Postgraduate School, USA).

"Open access journals have transformed the way scientific data is published and disseminated: particularly, whilst ensuring a high quality standard and transparency in the editorial process, they have increased the access to the scientific literature by those researchers that have limited library support or that are working on small budgets."

. —Richard Reithinger. (Westat, USA).

"Not only do open access journals greatly improve the access to high quality information for scientists in the developing world, it also provides extra exposure for our papers."

. —J. Ferwerda. (University of Oxford, UK).

"Open Access 'Chemistry' Journals allow the dissemination of knowledge at your finger tips without paying for the scientific content."

. —Sean L. Kitson. (Almac Sciences, Northern Ireland).

"In principle, all scientific journals should have open access, as should be science itself. Open access journals are very helpful for students, researchers and the general public including people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals. The articles are high standard and cover a wide area."

. —Hubert Wolterbeek. (Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands).

"The widest possible diffusion of information is critical for the advancement of science. In this perspective, open access journals are instrumental in fostering researches and achievements."

. —Alessandro Laviano. (Sapienza - University of Rome, Italy).

"Open access journals are very useful for all scientists as they can have quick information in the different fields of science."

. —Philippe Hernigou. (Paris University, France).

"There are many scientists who can not afford the rather expensive subscriptions to scientific journals. Open access journals offer a good alternative for free access to good quality scientific information."

"Open access journals have become a fundamental tool for students, researchers, patients and the general public. Many people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals benefit of them on a daily basis. The articles are among the best and cover most scientific areas."

. —M. Bendandi. (University Clinic of Navarre, Spain).

"These journals provide researchers with a platform for rapid, open access scientific communication. The articles are of high quality and broad scope."

. —Peter Chiba. (University of Vienna, Austria).

"Open access journals are probably one of the most important contributions to promote and diffuse science worldwide."

"Open access journals make up a new and rather revolutionary way to scientific publication. This option opens several quite interesting possibilities to disseminate openly and freely new knowledge and even to facilitate interpersonal communication among scientists."

. —Eduardo A. Castro. (INIFTA, Argentina).

"Open access journals are freely available online throughout the world, for you to read, download, copy, distribute, and use. The articles published in the open access journals are high quality and cover a wide range of fields."

. —Kenji Hashimoto. (Chiba University, Japan).

"Open Access journals offer an innovative and efficient way of publication for academics and professionals in a wide range of disciplines. The papers published are of high quality after rigorous peer review and they are Indexed in: major international databases. I read Open Access journals to keep abreast of the recent development in my field of study."

. —Daniel Shek. (Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong).

"It is a modern trend for publishers to establish open access journals. Researchers, faculty members, and students will be greatly benefited by the new journals of Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. in this category."