Sulzberger's Slimes shows its Marxist colors with a
predictable playing of the C-Card (Class Card) -- a time-tested and highly effective cousin of the "R-Card"
(Race), the "W-Card" (Women) and the dual-purpose "H-Card" (Hitler / Holocaust
TM). Out of the ugly emotion of envy, we are expected to oppose
the idea of being able to keep more of what we earn solely because "the rich" will also benefit from the reduced
rates -- as if the money would be better invested by the useless politicians and bureaucrats who want it all.

2. Then, their propagandists play the "C-Card" by telling
us that it's cigar-smoking rich "fat cat capitalists" in top hats who are robbing us; and that bigger government
is the solution. 3. That image sums up the real problem.

Now, notice how these communists
talk as if the money is rightly the government's:

Slimes: President Trump on Wednesday proposed sharp reductions
in individual and business income tax rates and a radical reordering of the tax code that would significantly benefit the
wealthy, but he offered no explanation of how the plan would be financed.

Rebuttal: "How the plan would
be financed?" This is ass-backwards!It is taxpayers who
"finance" the government, not the other way around.

Slimes:The proposal envisions slashing the
tax rate paid by businesses large and small to 15 percent. The number of individual income tax brackets would shrink from
seven to three — 10, 25 and 35 percent — easing the tax burden on most Americans, including the
president, although aides did not offer the income ranges for each bracket.

Rebuttal: "Easing
the tax burden on most Americans." That is all that should concern "most Americans" -- nothing more. Only a
petty and envious libtarded loser would be preoccupied with how much money the new rates would save the big bad "rich"
--- who just so happen to employ "most Americans."

Slimes: The president would eliminate the estate tax and alternative minimum tax, -- both moves that would richly benefit
Mr. Trump.

Rebuttal: The dirty insinuation that Trumpstein's proposal was crafted to "richly benefit"
himself, under the pretext of helping the economy, makes for one heck of a "conspiracy theory" TM.
Evidently, such childish unfounded accusations are socially acceptable if sanctioned by the Slimes and the rest of the Piranha
Press.

Slimes: Corporations would not have to pay taxes on their foreign profits, an unusual proposal for
a president who has championed an “America first” approach and railed against companies that move jobs and resources
overseas.

Rebuttal: Why would the factthat US corporations also
make profits in overseas markets run contrary to America First?Cutting taxes on money parked overseas would actually encourage
them to bring those cash resources back to America.

Slimes:
Mr. Trump wants to double the standard deduction for individuals, essentially eliminating taxes on around
$24,000 of a couple’s earnings.

Rebuttal: Now that tax cut is what should have
been in the headline! "Untax the working poor!"

Slimes: That proposal was met
with alarm by home builders and real estate agents, who fear it would disincentivize the purchase of homes. The proposal would
scrap most itemized deductions, such as those for state and local tax payments, ....

Rebuttal: Don't pop the champagne just yet. An elimination of the Federal tax deduction for local property
taxes can, in some states, amounts to a nice tax increase. In a very high property tax state like our native New
Jersey, the elimination of that deduction would offset a nice chunk of the cut in individual rates that Trumpstein is proposing.

Slimes: But the president would leave in place popular breaks for mortgage
interest, charitable contributions and retirement savings.

Rebuttal: Good.
But keep the local property tax deduction in there just the same.

Slimes: “This will pay for
itself with growth and with reduction of different deductions and closing loopholes,” Mr. Mnuchin said, repeating his
optimistic estimate that the plan would spur the economy to grow at a rate of 3 percent annually. “The economic plan
under Trump will grow the economy and will create massive amounts of revenues, trillions of dollars in additional revenues.”

Rebuttal: What Mnuchin (cough cough) is saying here is actually true. Because
these cuts will certainly fuel a few percentage points of economic growth, revenues to the Treasury will actually increase.
Nonetheless, when did "increasing revenue" -- by any means -- become "conservative?" We should
be slashing tax rates, slashing gross revenues, and "paying for it" by slashing spending even more. That
exactly how President Warren Harding rapidly ended the Wilson Depression in 1921 -- which is part of the
reason why modern court-historians rate him as "the worst President ever."

Harding didn't tinker with the existing rates. His administration healed America by rolling back both Wilson's taxes
and Wilson's spending by a whopping 50%! The result was an instantaneous and sustained recovery (finally
killed by the Fed in 1929).

Slimes: Democrats rejected what
they described as magical thinking behind the plan and condemned it as a giveaway to the rich ...

Rebuttal: There goes that "C-Card" again. God these Demonrats are such scum.

Slimes:
“This is an unprincipled tax plan that will result in cuts for the 1 percent, conflicts for the president, crippling
debt for America and crumbs for the working people,” Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, the ranking Democrat on the
Finance Committee, said in a statement.

Rebuttal:
All of a sudden, after 8 years of Obongo deficits which averaged $1.2 Trillionper year,
Senator Wyden (cough cough) is now concened about "crippling debt for America?"

Slimes:“We don’t
need a tax plan that allows the very rich to use pass-throughs to reduce their rates to 15 percent while average Americans
are paying much more,” Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic leader, said Wednesday. “That’s
not tax reform. That’s just a tax giveaway to the very, very wealthy that will explode the deficit.”

"Justin Gillis covers the science
of global climate change and the policy implications of that science."

TomatoBubble.com
and the excellent ClimateDepot.com have rebutted the outrageous false claims of this seditious snake on several
occasions. But that hasn't caused him to tone down his works of science-fiction to a more plausible-sounding level. His libtarded
audience evidently buys his bullshine, so why should he? Far from even pretending to be objective or reasonable, greasy Gillis'
garbage appears to be getting even more anti-scientific. Even by his standards, this piece about shoreline erosion ranks as
one of most dishonest examples of "Fake Science" that we have seen on the subject.

Haz-Mat suits and goggles on, boys
and girls. Into Gillis' goofy Globalist garbage we now wade.

Gillis' nonsense would be comical,
if its hidden agenda of world government weren't so dangerous.

***

Gillis: The
schoolmaster Benjamin Horne went to his repose in 1843 with this sentence chiseled above his head: “Sincerely regretted
by all who knew him.”If he ever managed to sleep peacefully beneath that pungent epitaph, Mr. Horne can rest
no longer.

Rebuttal: Oh the
bloody drama!

Gillis: The very island on which he lies (Tasmania) is being chewed away
by the sea. The roots of trees that have stood for decades now dangle perilously over a fast-eroding shore. A few miles
away, a seaside coal mine once worked by the convicts is under similar assault by the waves.

Rebuttal: Why
does Gillis need to go to other side of the world to cherry-pick an allegedly "fast-eroding shore." If the oceans
were rising and wreaking havoc as much as claimed, the damage should be global, right? Why not just go to Long Island or the
New Jersey shore?

Gillis: The ocean is rising in large part, of course, because people the world
over have burned so much coal, pumping planet-warming carbon dioxide into the air.

Rebuttal:
According to the satellite data -- the gold-standard of temperature reading -- the
planet is not even warming, at all. And even it was, periods of rapid cooling and rapid warming took place long before
the industrial revolution.

Gillis: Chris Sharples, a coastal consultant, has lately been spotting such problems all over
southern Tasmania, including once-sturdy electric poles in danger of falling over as the ocean strips the land away. ...

Rebuttal:
The natural and unpredictable phenomenon of beach and/or soil erosion, like temperature fluctuations,
has been observed for many centuries pre-dating the industrial revolution. There is always old sand
being removed and new sand being added to beaches. Depending on factors such as storm frequency and intensity, wind patterns
and ocean currents; the cycle of less sand / more sand can change drastically and unpredictably from year to year or decade
to decade.

1. Tasmania, eh? This devious devil sure went a looooong way to make his case for "beach
erosion by CO2." 2. The satellite-based data doesn't lie -- so scum like Gillis just ignore
it and cite rigged land-based data instead.

Rebuttal: Actually Sharples, that claim is only a "smoking gun" for your dishonesty.
Apart from the fact that there is no evidence linking increased CO2 (plant food) to the warming of the planet, termites
actually emit more CO2 than coal-burning. Indeed, the New York Slimes itself once reported this fact about about termite emissions
(here).

Gillis:
It (Port Arthur, Tasmania, Australia) is also under costly siege by a rising sea, ...

Rebuttal: How can the sea be rising if the polar icecap
coverage (as confirmed by satellite images) is the same as it was 50 years ago? Where would the added water be coming
from? Even NASA, as corrupted as it has become, confirms for us that the Antarctic has been gaining ice.(here)

Gillis: In country after country, managers of national parks and other
historic sites are realizing that climate change, represents a profound risk to the heritage they are trying to preserve.

Rebuttal:
Really? Give us another example that we can shoot down as false, Gillis.

Gillis: Venice, home of architectural
and artistic masterpieces, is under such grave threat that $6 billion worth of sea gates are being installed to protect against
increased tidal flooding.

Rebuttal: Gillis! You dirty stinking lying communist son-of-a-whore! The reason why Italy is investing in "$6 billion worth of sea gates" to protect Venice is not because the Adriatic
Sea is rising, but because the city itself, for centuries, has been slowly sinking and even tilting
toward the Adriatic. This is caused by a portion of the Adriatic plate "subducting" beneath the Apennines Mountains.
Look it up! (here)

Of course, you know this -- and we know that you know.

The Adriatic Plate Subduction is about geology --- not "climate science." In due time,
wet Venice, like other sunken cities of antiquity, is doomed anyway.

Gillis:
In the United States, most of the glaciers that in the 19th century dotted what is now Glacier National Park have already
melted,...

Rebuttal: More
cherry-picked data! On every continent of the world there can also be found glaciers which are expanding. As is the
case with specially selected examples of "beach erosion," the warmists only focus on shrinking glaciers, never the
expanding ones -- of which there are many. (here)

Gillis: .... and the rest are expected to be gone within this century.

Rebuttal: "Expected to be gone?" Who
expects this to happen, Gillis? Answer: His cherry-picked and government-funded fake scientists, that's who!

Gillis: The very symbol of America, the Statue of Liberty, cannot
be considered safe. Flooding from Hurricane Sandy, made worse by a century of sea-level rise, destroyed much of the infrastructure
on Liberty Island in 2012 and closed the monument to visitors for months.

Rebuttal: Hurricane Sandy was, well, a damn hurricane! And it just happened
to strike during a full moon high tide (one week before Obongo's re-election). Hurricane + High Tide = Erosion. Duh.
It had nothing to do with CO2.

Gillis:
Rising ocean temperatures and rising sea levels are two sides of a coin: Most of the excess heat trapped by human emissions
of greenhouse gases is absorbed by the ocean, and the water expands as it warms, accounting for much of
the rise in the sea over the past century.

Rebuttal: New lies for old! You
see, boys and girls, because the easily observable ice at the poles is clearly not "melting," the warmists have
had to tweak their Fake Science to attribute the imaginary rise in sea levels to the "heated" and "expanding
water." Methinks the academic ass-clowns are confusing air (which rapidly expands when heated) with water.

Experiment:
Fill up a glass with cold tap water. Let it sit at room temperature for 10 minutes. Tell us if the level "expands"
after just a few degrees of warm up.

According to the new crackpot theory-of-the-day,
just a few degrees of room temps, near the surface only, should cause the water level to rise?

Gillis: Over the long term, the rise of the
sea appears to be accelerating because of runaway growth in greenhouse emissions, and scientists fear much bigger effects
this century, perhaps so large they could ultimately force the abandonment of entire coastlines.

Gillis:David Luchsinger was in charge of the
Statue of Liberty for the National Park Service when Hurricane Sandy ravaged Liberty Island in 2012, ... said the issue with
historic sites was not just finding the money to make them more resilient, but also slowing the emissions that are putting
them at risk in the first place.

Rebuttal:
Warmists like Mr. Luchsinger (cough cough) just love using the good ol' Statue of Liberty Scare. Indeed,
your rebutting reporter here was in the 8th grade -- more years ago than I care to count -- when teacher taught us that "some
scientists" say that the Statue of Liberty could be under water by the Year 2000. I suppose we need to bump Disaster-Day
up by a few more decades, ..... again... and then again... and then again.

National Geographic
and NBC News use ridiculous Statue of Liberty flood imagery to scare us into the "solution" to the problem --- bigger
government & world government!

*

Boobus
Americanus
1: I read an interesting piece in today's New York Times about how the Tasmanian shoreline is being ravaged
by the effects of Climate Change.

Sugar: Hey boobusss! A freak tornadoput out the Washington DC fire that the Britissh sset in 1814. But there were
no carss and coal-fired electricty plantss back then! What caussed that sstorm, idiot?!

Editor: Termite farts.

*

COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

Email address:

Comments:

greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

MONDAY / APRIL 24, 2017

Geoffrey Rush as the older Albert Einstein in “Genius,” a series beginning on National Geographic.

New York Times:Review: ‘Genius,’ a Portrait
of the Man Behind the Equation

REBUTTAL BY

Even for those of us who watch a minimal amount
of television each week, a bit of channel-surfing was sure to stumble across the hype over National Geographic's
just-released 10 part mini-series titled "Genius" --- about the communist, crackpot,
plagiarist, warmonger and Time Magazine's "Man of the 20th Century," St. Albert Einstein(cough cough). The artificial exaltation of the slovenly sock-less fiend, that the great Serbian-American scientist
/ inventor Nikola Tesla referred to (in a private letter) as "a long-haired crank," ranks
right up there with the Holohoax and the 9/11 scams as the most elaborate con jobs of all time.

Even if, purely for the sake of argument, we were to accept Einstein's stolen (here) "Theory of Relativity"TM
as mathematical proof that space is curved, time is "relative,"
and nothing can ever exceed the speed of light, the fact remains that none of Einstein's "discoveries" ever had
any practical application. So why is he so endlessly hero-worshipped whereas his contemporary applied scientists
-- great men whose work has improved and even saved countless lives - such as Roentgen(X-Rays),
Tesla(commercial electricity and so much more), Marconi (wireless technology),
Fleming(anti-biotic), Carrier(father of refrigeration & air conditioning),
Von Braun (rocket science) and so many others remain unknown in the popular culture? Need we
even answer that rhetorical question for you?

Tesla the Great had that Jewish
ass-clown and his "relativity" nonsense all figured out.

Totally unconnected to the recent TV hype of "Genius,"
while randomly browsing through the historical pdf archives of the New York Slimes last night -- a service made possible
by the generous support of our readers (hint-hint) --the cosmic hand of fate dropped us on a very interesting
1940 puff-piece about this wretched monster who had fled "Nazi" Germany (because of his Communist affiliations)
and was in the process of becoming an "American." We decided to incorporate our rebuttal to the hypocrisy and openly-expressed
political subversion of the "genius" into today's feature.

June 23rd, 1940

EINSTEIN PREDICTS AN ARMED LEAGUE

Scientist Says Wilson's Work Will Be Revived by Nations
in a More Powerful Form

Times, 1940: Professor Albert Einstein advocated a world-wide federation of nations with "control
over the whole military power of its members" soon after he had taken his final examination for American citizenship
here today. He predicted the recreation of Woodrow Wilson's League of Nations "in a more powerful form."

Rebuttal: Why did this piece of filth even bother to take an American citizenship exam if his wished to see America
(and all nations) ended and rolled up into a "federation of nations" stripped of all individual self-defense
and subject to a "powerful" world government?

Times, 1940: The author of the theory of relativity asserted that "a Federal organization of
the nations of the world is not only possible but an absolute necessity if the conditions on our planet are not to become
unbearable for men."

Rebuttal:
Sounds exactly like the Global Warming TM
/ Climate Change TM hoax of today, doesn't it? You see, in order to "save the
planet," we need a New World Order. Get it?

Times, 1940: From Princeton, where he is a Professor of Mathematics, ...

Rebuttal: You see, he was
only a college math teacher -- not an experimental scientist.

.

1. Math equations are only the language
of science --- not the science in and of itself. 2. Tesla the Great warned about the growing use of "dazzling math"
to obfuscate truth.

*

Times, 1940: Professor Einstein came to Trenton accompanied by his daughter, Margot
... both seeking citizenship.

Rebuttal:
Einstein didn't believe in nations, so why even bother? He once
said: “I am by heritage a Jew, by citizenship a Swiss,
and by makeup a human being, and only a human being, without any special attachment to any state or national entity
whatsoever.”

Times,
1940: The white-haired German emigre ...

Rebuttal: "German" my ass! (cough
cough)

Times, 1940:
.. talked affably with newspaper men as he entered the court house.

Rebuttal: The
newspapermen of the day followed ugly Albert about like puppy dogs, and the egomaniac who H.L. Mencken once
referred to as a "fiend for publicity" loved every moment of it.

"Several years ago, when asked why I had given up my position
in Germany, I made this statement: "As long as I have any choice, I will only stay in a country where political liberty,
toleration and equality of all citizens before the law is the rule."

Rebuttal: Oh, cut the crap, Albert! You left Germany because the new
Boss wasn't going to put up with your Marxist bullshine anymore. That, plus the fact that so many of Germany's great men of
science openly scoffed at your crackpot theory, is what prompted you to come to America and maintain your "rock star"
status.

Einstein mania ended in the Great
One's Germany. It reignited 10-fold upon his arrival to Jewish-run America. Reporters swarmed the "genius" wherever
he went and the fame-addicted fraud loved every moment of it.

Times, 1940(quoting
Einstein): "I think from what I have seen of Americans since I have come here is that they are not suited by temperament
or tradition for existence under a totalitarian system."

Rebuttal: If you were so put off by "totalitarian systems", St. Albert,
then why did you refuse to sign a 1934 petition condemning the very "totalitarian" Stalin's mass killings and imprisonments?
In refusing to sign, you wrote:“The Russians have proved that their only aim is really the improvement of the lot of the Russian
people.” (here)

Rebuttal: The man that
King Jew Bernard Baruch and others blackmailed into prolonging a nearly-ended war, and getting 125,000 of
his countrymen killed for Globalism and Zionism, is, in the twisted view of the great "genius" and "pacifist,"
an "outstanding statesman" and "intellectual." (palm to face, shaking head, sighing).

Times, 1940 (quoting Einstein):"His greatest achievement,
the League of Nations, appears today a failure on superficial observation. But in spite of the mutilation by his contemporaries
and the boycott of his fellow countrymen,.."

Rebuttal:
Ah yes. Those stupid "isolationists" who "mutilated" the "great achievement" of Woodrow
Wilson Warmonger. Albert, your politics is as screwed up as your fake science --- but then again, you already know that, dontcha?

Times, 1940(quoting Einstein):"Wilson's work will be created,
in my opinion, in a more powerful form. Then only will the importance of this great innovator be fully recognized. A
worldwide organization cannot insure peace effectively unless it has control over the entire military power of its members."

Rebuttal: All
military power concentrated in a single global entity? Sure sounds a lot like "totalitarianism," eh, Professor?

The Globalists immortalize their own
as the "intellectual" boobs guzzle down their liquid excrement as if it were mothers' milk.

Boobus
Americanus
1: Are you going to watch that mini-series about Einstein on National Geographic?

Boobus
Americanus
2: I am looking forward to it very much.
The genius of Einstein is without parallel.

Editor: And it's got "black holes" too, from which no light
can emanate.

*

COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

Email address:

Comments:

greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

SUNDAY / APRIL 23, 2017

James & Kathryn
Murdoch / Lachlan & Sarah Murdoch

New York Times: In House of Murdoch, Sons Set
About An Elaborate Overhaul

By BROOKS BARNES and SYDNEY
EMBER

REBUTTAL BY

For the PRC
(Predatory Ruling Class), the neo-con propaganda outlet FOX News has, for the past 20 years or so, served
the important purpose of keeping conservatives on a leash long enough to allow to them vent off their frustration, yet just
short enough to keep them from wandering off into the land of total truth. The sole saving grace of the network was that,
in allowing just enough cosmetic "conservatism" to air before millions of viewers, a percentage of the more astute
elements of the massive audience would eventually wander off the plantation completely and join the ranks of the full truth
"conspiracy theorists" TM. Indeed, during
the late 1990's, your now fully enlightened Editor here passed through the FAUX News / Rush Limbaugh halfway-house before
growing out of the "Left-Right" control cage altogether.

For that reason, in spite of our disdain for
Rupert Murdoch's FAUX, we are nonetheless troubled by the recent and much-publicized rise of his de-balled
sons (Lachlin & James) and their stupid and controlling communist wives (Sarah & Kathyrn).
The scuttlebutt, coming from multiple sources within FOX, is that the contemptible, yet immensely popular, Bill O'Reilly
was forced out by these beautiful women. O'Reilly's coveted 8 PM slot will be filled by Tucker Carlson, whose
first guest as the new 8-PMer under the reign of the Bolshevik Bitches will be a man that O'Reilly once mocked -- the freakish
trannie, Bruce Jenner(now referred to as "Caitlyn").

1. Kathryn made no effort to hide her love for Hillary and red-hot hatred for Trump & Bannon
(She likes Ivanka though!)

Expect some of O'Reilly's
elderly following to have heart attacks when Jenner appears with Carlson this coming Monday (April 24th)! But don't
blame Carlson (who is actually not that bad) for having such a vile Satanic creature on his program. You can be sure
that the Murdoch women, Kathryn in particular, are behind this obscenity. The Sisters-in-Law Murdoch had already previously
amended the company's benefits package to include "expanded
coverage for our transgender colleagues.”

Both Kathryn and Sarah are known to be "progressives." Of the two, Katryn
(much like another silly little rich girl, Ivanka Trump) wields more power in her own right. She is a real fanatic
when it comes to Trump-bashing, homosexuality, trannies and the Global Warming TM /
Climate Change TM hoax. Since the Murdochs swallowed up National Geographic
in 2015, that psuedo-scientific rag has continued to aggressively push the hoax while not allowing any real scientists
to rebut the "settled science." The "philanthropist" Kathryn also worked for both the Clinton
Climate Initiative and the Environmental Defense Fund. (here)

.

Old man Rupert once dismissed the
Global Warming TM / Climate Change TM hoax as "alarmist nonsense." We expect this attitude at FOX News to "evolve"
and eventually align with the views of the young Murdochs' National Geographic and Kathryn's beloved Environmental Defense Fund.

Now if you thought those National Geographic covers were bad, get a load of the EVIL
boy-trannie child-abuse abomination that the next generation of the House of Murdoch recently put out. It's enough to almost
make us want to plead with wretched old man Rupert Murdoch and that arrogant ass-clown Bill O'Reilly -- "Please,
stay!"

The modern trend of men allowing their deranged women to rule over them is yet another symptom of
the decay and decline of Western Civilization. Another high profile example of this alarming phenomenon is baby girl's Ivanka
Trump-Kushner's uncontrolled White House antics -- such as her uninformed public support for the Global Warming TM
/ Climate Change TM hoax, "women's workplace
issues," and her meeting with the baby butchers and baby body-part dealers of Planned Parenthood. Neither "The Donald"
nor Ivanka's typically P-whipped Jewish husband, Jared Kushner, could reign in this spoiled little brat even
if they wanted to.

And speaking of P-whipped, can it get any more pathetic than Pro Football Super Star and Trumpstein supporter,
Tom Brady, failing to show up at the White House ceremony to honor the New England Patriots Super Bowl victory?
You see, boys and girls, Brady's super-model wife, Giselle Bundchen, is an outspoken pro-abortionist, an
anti-Trump tweeter, and a "Climate Change" TM libtard who is evidently embarrassed
and fed-up with her husband's support for Trumpstein. We'll bet you dimes to doughnuts that the lovely Giselle put her high-heeled
foot down and threatened to close down the candy store until pretty Tommy put an end to his public support for Trumpstein.

Your
old-school Editor here at The Anti-New York Times has the utmost gentlemanly respect for the ladies. That
respect does not extend to any "man" who allows a woman, no matter how blonde and beautiful, to de-ball
and dictate to him. Unless and until men rediscover their balls and tell the Ivanka Trumps, the Giselle Bundchens, the Kathryn
Murdochs and the Sarah Murdochs of our diseased and decaying society: "Shut up and sit down, you silly woman!"
-- there will be no hope for the recovery of our collective sanity. Then again, in fairness to such men and in consideration
of what our Marxist courts allow these wayward women to inflict upon husbands and fathers, many bullied men have no choice
but to meekly accept the mischief of their wives -- or face alienation from their children.

Sick upside-down world!

* * * * * *

Proverbs 21:19: Better to dwell in
the wilderness, than with a contentious and angry woman.

* * * * * *

1
& 2. On the very day that Giselle tweeted out her support for the coming anti-Trump "Climate, Jobs &
Justice" communist rally in DC, pussy-boy Tommy, (who had openly endorsed Trump!) pulled an inexplicable and disrespectful
White House snub.

3. James & Kathryn Murdoch --- you can just tell who rules that roost!

Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in the New York Times that the Murdoch sons and their wives are much more liberal than the old
man.

Boobus
Americanus
2: It would be nice if they overhaul FOX News and make it more objective. As it stands now, I can't stomach
it.

Sugar: Hey Boobusss! Ya think your panssie-ass could stomach a ssubscription
to the Anti-New York Times?

Editor: IfBoobus can't even handle
the watered-down half-truths of FAUX News, then he'd surely puke his guts up over the pure brew that we serve up.

*

COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

Email address:

Comments:

greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

FRIDAY / APRIL 21, 2017

New York Times:Ruth Sulzberger Holmberg, Newspaper
Publisher, Dies at 96

By ROBERT D. McFADDEN

REBUTTAL BY

Ruth Sulzberger
Holmberg (cough cough), an aunt of Slimes head-honcho Arthur
Ochs Sulzberger Jr., has died in Chattanooga, Tennessee at the age of 96. Sugar and I, er, "The
Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times had never heard of this woman before, but a close "reading-between-the-lines"
deciphering of this puff-piece eulogy tells us all we need to know to feel good about saying, with remorseless righteousness,
to this influential wench --
rot in hell Ruthie, rot in hell.

************

Slimes: Growing up in a newspaper family in New York, Mrs. Holmberg was imbued from
adolescence with journalistic traditions of social responsibility,

Translation: Growing up as a Sulzberger,
Red Ruthie saw it as her divine mission to spread Marxist poison through the press.

Slimes:
... and that heritage became manifest in Chattanooga as she presided over a newspaper known for editorials that denounced
racial segregation,...

Translation: The she-devil went down to Dixie to stir up the happy bruthas
and sistas against the big bad White Man.

Like Ruth Sulzberger, most of the "White" outside agitators who went to states like Tennessee to help
Marxist Loser King promote "civil rights" were Jewish. They didn't give a damn about Blacks, of
course. Their true cause was to subordinate the White Man and prepare him for his ultimate extinction.

Slimes: ... exposed government corruption and demanded cleaner air in a city of heavy
industry and belching smokestacks.

Translation: ... attacked conservative politicians and the business
community.

Slimes: For years she was a pariah in a city where
many regarded her as an Eastern liberal interloper.

Analysis: She was seen as an "Eastern liberal interloper" because that's exactly what
she was.

Slimes:
She was a granddaughter of Adolph S. Ochs, who bought The Chattanooga Times in 1878 and The New York Times
in 1896...

Analysis:
For more than a century now, this evil communist clan has been at this ghoulish game of manufacturing public opinion. Amazing,
isn't it?

The
Ochs-Sulzberger Crime Dynasty --- 121 years of influence, answerable to no one.

Slimes: A Smith College graduate who had been a Red Cross volunteer in England and
France during World War II,...

Analysis: Elite Jews don't volunteer for anything unless
there is something is in it for them. Red Ruthie worked with the Red Cross in England and France only to support the Jewish
war against peaceful Germany.

Slimes: Chattanooga, a city of 140,000 in southeastern
Tennessee, was nothing remotely like the New York City where Mrs. Holmberg had grown up, in Manhattan.

Translation:
The people may not have been "sophisticated," but unlike New York elite, they were honest and decent.

Slimes: It (Chattanooga) did not welcome Eastern liberals or Jews,
even secular Jews who were married to Christians, as she was.

Translation: Wherever "Eastern liberals or Jews" touch down, they immediately start acting as if they
own the place.

Slimes:
Racial segregation was practiced there and “outsiders” were distrusted.

Translation: The good Christian folk of Dixieland didn't take to kindly
to the type of pornography, vulgarity and degenerate art that scum like the Sulzberger's bring with them like a plague.

1. Red Ruthie, second from
right, with her siblings, from left, Dr. Judith P. Sulzberger, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger and Marian Sulzberger Heiskell, in
1991. 2& 3.Because Satanic scum like
Ruth Sulzberger Holmberg have served as Directors, the Smithsonian Museums of Washington DC have become
notorious for promoting "modern art," libtard propaganda, and fake science. 4.
The lovely and gracious Ruthie Sulzberger.

Slimes: The Chattanooga Times, a morning paper with a circulation of about
40,000, turned profits but was shunned by many readers and advertisers, who preferred a rival paper that often skirted local
controversies and offered a deeply conservative viewpoint.

Translation: Sulzberger's Marxist filth was deeply resented
by many locals.

Slimes: “I was born into the Sulzberger-Ochs family,” she
declared, “and am deeply committed to the quality of journalism that these two names have come to exemplify.”

Translation:
"I will shove my Marxism down the throats of these racist rednecks whether they like it or not."

Slimes:
The Chattanooga Times championed the racial integration of schools and universities, supported civil rights legislation
in Congress...

Translation:The Chattanooga
Times was anti-White.

Slimes:The Times also endorsed reforms to ... expand the voting franchise
and give black residents, a third of the population, a larger voice in municipal affairs.

Translation: Red Ruthie,
like Karl Marx, advocated universal voting rights for all, including the illiterate, the indigent, the moron-level IQ crowd
and the dead.

Slimes: As her influence widened, Mrs. Holmberg became nationally prominent. She
was elected president of the Southern Newspaper Publishers Association in 1984 and later
became the second woman, after Katharine (Meyer) Graham(cough cough), the longtime publisher of
The Washington Post, to be elected as a director of The Associated Press, one of the dominant news service
in America.

Translation: Jews run the media.

Slimes: After leaving The Chattanooga Times, she remained active in philanthropy and civic affairs.

Translation:
She used her wealth to promote the spread of Marxist cancer throughout Dixie.

*****************

The Big 3 Yentas
of the Yiddish Yellow Press are all gone now, but oh what damage they did!

Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in the New York Times about a Jewish lady who owned a newspaper in Tennessee and has just died.
She was one of the Sulzberger family that runs the New York Times. The racists down there really hated her.

Boobus
Americanus
2: The South has not yet learned to
be multi-cultural.

Sugar: Zzzzzzz. Zzzzzzzz. Zzzzzzz.

Editor:
The Crazed Conspiracy Cat was making
rather merry well into the wee hours celebrating Hitler'sbirthday yesterday. I gave her the day off.

*

COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

Email address:

Comments:

greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

THURSDAY / APRIL 20, 2017

New York Times: Aircraft Carrier Wasn’t
Sailing to Deter North Korea, as U.S. Suggested

By MARK LANDLER and ERIC
SCHMITT

REBUTTAL BY

In our controversial Easter Sunday TomatoBubble
piece titled, "Could Trump, Putin & Xi Be Conspiring For Peace?" (here) -- we speculated that Trumpstein's anti-Syrian and anti-North Korean sabre-rattling-over-chocolate-cake
with Xi may have been nothing more than theater intended to hold the world-warmongers at bay. This story about the "armada"
that was said to have been headed towards North Korea, when, in reality, it was actually sailing away from North
Korea, only strengthens the hypothesis that Trumpstein does not intend to make war against Lil' Kim.

1. Trumpstein's "armada"
was actually heading away from the Korean peninsula. 2. "Xi, I'm gonna make everybody
think that an attack on North Korea is imminent. Then you step in and make it look like we all came to an agreement, because
of my leadership. Putin and Assad are all in as well."

From the article:

*****

“We’re sending an armada,” Mr. Trump said
to Fox News last Tuesday afternoon.

The problem was that the carrier, the Carl Vinson, and the three other warships in its strike
force were that very moment sailing in the opposite direction, to take part in joint exercises with the Australian Navy
in the Indian Ocean, 3,500 miles southwest of the Korean Peninsula."

White House officials said Tuesday that they had been relying on guidance from the Defense Department.
Officials there described a glitch-ridden sequence of events ... which perpetuated the false narrative that a flotilla was
racing toward the waters off North Korea.

By the time the White House was asked about the Carl Vinson, its imminent arrival
had been emblazoned on front pages across East Asia, fanning fears that Mr. Trump was considering a pre-emptive military
strike. It was portrayed as further evidence of the president’s muscular style days after he ordered a missile strike
on Syria that came while he and President Xi Jinping of China chatted over dessert during a meeting in Florida.

With
Mr. Trump himself playing up the show of force, Pentagon officials said, rolling back the story became difficult."

*****

South Korean and Japanese news media, as well as Sulzberger's
Slimes, had all hyped-up the "armada" as evidence that the crisis was intensifying. Even Sugar and I, er, "the Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York
Times ripped into Trumpstein for provoking World War 3 after Trumpstein himself stoked fears of military action with
an early AM Twitter rant: “North Korea is looking for trouble. If China decides to help, that would be great.
If not, we will solve the problem without them! U.S.A.”

Trumpstein tweeted against North
Korea and China; and the Piranha Press took the bait.

Now it seems that the Piranha Press is catching on to the possibility that the White
House, as it did with the Syrian missiles-strikes-to-nowhere, is playing them on North Korea as well. For its part in the
global drama, the Chinese are expressing "concerns" about the big showdown as they plead with Sherrif Trumpstein
for calm and diplomacy. Meanwhile, Vice President Mike Pence continues to play his assigned supporting role
by visiting vassal-state South Korea and spewing out more "tough guy" war rhetoric to add to the effect. Of course,
this is not in any way to suggest that the Trumpstein-Kushner co-presidency is going to turn against the Masters of the Universe
(cough cough) and finally liberate us from the Globalist-Marxist-Zionist Axis of Evil and restore Jefferson's America.
No way.

Our interpretation of this game-playing scenario (assuming it turns out to be correct) is that among the
ranks of the PRC (Predatory Ruling Class), and even within the government of Israel and the Mossad itself,
there are a number of elites who just don't think World War 3 is a good idea. You see, even the greasiest of gangsters love
their children too!

1. "By conquest or consent." Evidently, there is a faction of the Predatory Ruling
Class which prefers the long game towards World Order to the World War 3 route. 2. Kissinger,
who speaks with hope and optimism of Trumpstein, has always been one of those Globalists who seems to prefer multi-decade
strategic subversion to the World War scenario.

Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in the New York Times that Trump's armada wasn't even sailing towards North Korea.

Boobus
Americanus
2: His missile strike on Syria and his
Pacific armada seem to have been tricks to boost his popularity.

Washington Post:It’s Not Easy Being the
New Conservative Columnist At the New York Times

*

FOX News: New
York Times Hire of Conservative Scribe Bret Stephens Seen as Move to Widen Readership

REBUTTAL BY

The fact that both the "left" Washington
Compost and the "right" FAUX News both chose to describe the Slimes' hiring of "conservative"
columnist Bret Stephens, formerly of the "conservative" Wall Street Urinal, as
an attempt by Sulzberger's Slimes to "broaden its audience," proves the both wings of America's ruling Idiocracy,
notwithstanding their different twists of flavor, are all essentially part of the same PRC (Predatory Ruling Class).
In spite of his English name and mild skepticism for Global Warming TM, the new kid on 8th Avenue --
just like that other Slimes scribbler with an English name and a "conservative" label," David Brooks--is as Jewish,
as Globalist, as warmongering and as rabidly Zionist as they come. Stephens' occasional girly-punches leveled at the warmist
scam or this or that liberal only serve the all-important purpose of "sheep dipping" his wolfish face in the eyes
of gullible conservatives.

Until more people
figure out the how the "choice" of Left-Right works, nothing will get solved politically.

Stephens' "conservative" resume includes a degree from Rothschild's London
School of Economics, a stint as Editor of the Jerusalem Post, a Pulitzer Prize, and
a series of scathing anti-Trump (hence, pro-Hillary) columns inked during the 2016 QFS (Quadrennial Freak
Show). With credentials such as those, tagging Stephens as a "conservative" is like calling the morbidly
obese Chris Crispy Cream Christie a health-food fanatic. But that's how the PRC's Left-Right mind-control
scam rolls on, year after year after year.

This dirty business of the Press controlling both sides of any given political
divide has been going on a long time. And no one nailed it any better than The Great One (that's Hitler
for you newbies and normies). From His Munich speech of July 28, 1922, given when he was still relatively unknown, --
take it away boss:

The Boss figured had the Left-Right "March
of Tyranny" all figured out out a long time ago.

“The master-stroke of the Jew was to claim the leadership
of the fourth estate (the press). He founded the Movements both of the Social Democrats and the Communists. His policy was
twofold: he had his ‘apostles’ in both political camps.

“Under the concept of Democracy, it was possible to create a State-form by which the mastery over the herd
by the Jewish intelligentsia who control the organs of information is guaranteed. Though small in numbers
and therefore completely hidden in the body of the people, who quite unconscious of whom they were obeying, in the end did
but serve the purposes of this small stratum of society.”

You see, Sulzberger's Slimes will graciously allow you to
have a choice between high-salaried in-house "liberals" like Paul Krugman(cough cough)
and Tom Friedman(cough cough) --
or high-salaried
in-house "respectable conservatives" like David Brooks(cough cough) or Bret Stephens (cough cough). Meanwhile,
writers like Sugar and I, er, "The Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times
are confined to the outer reaches of the Internet -- at least until it remains legal. How bloody unjust is the world in which
we live in!

vs

The Great "Left-Right" Editorial Debate at the Slimes:

The
Jewish "liberals" Friedman & Krugman agree with the Jewish "conservatives" Brooks and Stephens on
just about every damn thing that really matters!

Boobus
Americanus
1: The New York Times just brought in a conservative columnist from the Wall Street Journal.

Boobus
Americanus
2: It's important to give voice to both
sides of an issue -- as long it is not one of those right-wing conspiracy extremists.

Sugar: Let me do a frickin' column! I'll sshow them uppity New York libtardss a right-wing consspiracy
extremisst like they never sseen before!

Editor: There has got to be a way
to hack into their system and plant an article.

Slimes contributer
Richard A. Friedman(cough, cough) is a professor of clinical psychiatry and the Director of the
psychopharmacology clinic at Cornell Medical College. In this piece about his love for mathematics, he reveals, albeit not
intending to do so, the hidden psychological reason behind why many of today's "scientists" have gotten
carried away with creating and solving math equations when they should be conducting experiments and making observations instead.
The great, and we do mean greatNikola Tesla (1856-1943) warned about this 20th Century trend when
he trashed Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" as:

"... a beggar wrapped in purple whom ignorant people
take for a king" --- a mass of error and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the teachings of great men of science
of the past and even to common sense... the theory wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent
mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. Its exponents are very
brilliant men, but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists. Not a single one of the relativity propositions has been
proved." (NYT, 7/11/1935, p. 23).

Apart from the "big picture"
problem of the deliberate and politically-motivated scientific fraud behind such theories as Big Bang TM,
Evolution TM, Relativity TM, and Global Warming TM,
there is a reason why so many otherwise honest scientists who are not "in on it" come to actually believe, quite
passionately, in so many of these bogus theories. And that reason is revealed in Friedman's article.

As
students, the blackboard masturbaters Stephen Hawking -- that over-rated stiff from Weekend at Bernie's --
and St. Albert Einstein (cough cough) struggled with applied (experimental) physics. They only "excelled"
in the less demanding, purely math-based field of "theoretical physics."

Friedman: I was doing KenKen, a math puzzle, on a plane recently when a fellow passenger
asked why I bothered. I said I did it for the beauty. O.K., I’ll admit
it’s a silly game: You have to make the numbers within the grid obey certain mathematical constraints, and when they
do, all the pieces fit nicely together and you get this rush of harmony and order.

Analysis: Friedman gets "a
rush of harmony and order." Who among us has not experienced a similar "rush" by solving a
challenging math problem back during school days, or piecing together a jig-saw puzzle, or figuring out how to assemble something.
The more challenging the problem, the greater the "rush."

Friedman: I’ve loved math since I was a kid because it felt like
a big game and because it seemed like the laziest thing you could do mentally. After all, how many facts
do you need to remember to do math?

Analysis: Once one has mastered the basic principles of mathematics,
it really does become "a game" which, in spite of its seeming complexity, does not require the type of creative
mental work needed to devise sound experiments. As counter-intuitive as it may seem to the mathematically-challenged among
us, there really is a certain "laziness" to basing science upon math-games instead of experiments.

Friedman:
Later in college, I got excited by physics, ...

Analysis: In college, the only thing your charming reporter
here got excited by was the girls-gone-wild, but I digress. The word "excited," like "rush," again conveys
pleasure and emotion.

Friedman:
... which I guess you could say is just a grand exercise in applying math to understand the universe.

Analysis: More like
mis-applying math to "understand the universe." Tesla also warned about this trend of pushing mathematics
way beyond the limits of its useful purpose -- one of our favorite Tesla quotes (below):

1.Tesla
warned about this disturbing trend, and even questioned the sanity of the "relativists."2.
Children can indeed become "excited" by math, once they understand it. When the emotional
gratification of solving equations becomes addicting, a "scientist" can fall
into the trap of mistaking math equations (the language of science) for the actual "science" in and of itself.

Friedman:
We all know that art, music and nature are beautiful. They command the senses and incite emotion. Their
How can a mathematical idea inspire the same feelings? Well, for one
thing, there is something very appealing about the notion of universal truth ...

Analysis: Emotion. Emotion. Emotion.

Friedman:
But our brains also appear to respond to mathematical beauty as they do to other beautiful experiences. In a 2014 study, Semir Zeki, a neuroscientist at University College London, and other researchers
used M.R.I. scanners to observe the brains of 15 mathematicians while they were thinking about various equations. ...

The researchers found a
strong correlation between finding an equation beautiful and activation of the medial orbitofrontal cortex, .... This
is the same area that has been shown to light up when people find music or art beautiful, so it seems to be a common neural
signature of aesthetic experience.

Geeks, take heart: While you can’t see or hear mathematical ideas, they too are capable of arousing
a sense of beauty.

Analysis: "Arousal," eh? I was wondering what you were doing in the bathroom with
that math book, Friedman.

Friedman: The medial orbitofrontal cortex is also active
when we find something pleasurable or rewarding, which isn’t surprising either, since you’d expect
beautiful experiences to be both.

Analysis: In other words, these oh-so-logical and oh-so-dispassionate thinkers who refer
to themselves as "theoretical scientists," are operating under the intoxicating influence of their medial orbitofrontal
cortex. In essence, they are getting "high" on math -- even as they mock their doubters for being guided
by "emotions!"

The reason that these dorkie druggies react so irrationally, or even violently, when challenged (again,
we are talking about the duped true-believing scientists here, not the master fraudsters who originate the fake theories)
is because their chemically-intoxicated egos (which are really just infantile psyches) cannot cope with having
their drugs -- their "rush" -- taken away from them.

Crackpots
are actually getting high on elaborate math equations with no basis in reality. Their Fake Science is then peddled by the
Fake Media.

The psuedo-scientists invest so much emotion
into the elegant mathematics of the theory-of-the-month that they never pause to reflect upon whether or not the underlying
assumptions behind the equation were ever relevant to reality to begin with. Nor do they seem to notice that the theory which
a given equation purports to "prove", as dazzling as the calculations may be,
may not actually be observable. Sorry, professor, but the most important equation of all, when it comes to
true science, is this: NO = NS (No Observation = No Science).

In short, the "theoretical scientists" may
be skilled at crafting and solving the math equations which "excite" and "arouse" them so much, but they
absolutely suck at the underlying skill of philosophy which should serve as the basis of any true scientific hypothesis and
subsequent experiment. So don't be intimidated by these ass-clowns, their "credentials," their blackboards, and
their Nobel Prizes. Just laugh at them.

Boobus
Americanus
1: I read an interesting piece in today's New York Times about how the pleasure centers of the brain are
activated when a mathematician solves a problem.

Boobus
Americanus
2: I always enjoyed the mental challenge of math when I was in school.

Sugar: I enjoy the mental challenge of playing cards. That doessn't make me a frickin' sscientisst!

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad,
the former Iranian president, was surrounded by members of the news media after registering to run on Wednesday

New York Times:
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Ex-President of Iran, Files to Run Again

By THOMAS
ERDBRINK

REBUTTAL BY

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad making a comeback? Sweet!

We really miss this ballsy little fellow from Iran who had a unique talent for really
pissing-off the Zionists and their hired henchmen. The despicable Sean Hannity of Mossad-Fox would refer
to him as Mahmoud "Adolf"
Ahmadinejad -- a damn fine compliment in our book! On hundreds of different occasions, warmonger Hannity reminded
his radio listeners and FOXtard viewers that Ahmadinejad had threatened
to "wipe Israel off of the map." In reality, the Farsi translated to "the Zionist
occupation regime will vanish from the pages of time, like the Soviet Union." And yet, Trumpstein's butt-boy Hannity
still continues to sell the big lie about the "wipe Israel off the map" quote.

Mossad-Boy Sean Hannity foams
at the mouth when discussing Iran. His particular hatred for Ahmadinejad extended to American "isolationists" who argued for improved relations
with Iran (above: attacking "isolationist" Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan)

It would be really fun to have the colorful and outspoken ex-President back
for another round. Ahmadinejad was "notorious" for denying the Holocaust TM.
(Actually, he only questioned it, which means he doesn't buy it.) The entertainment highlight of his Presidency,
for us, came in 2006 when his government sponsored a two-day conference
called the International Conference to Review the Global Vision of the Holocaust. Iran's Foreign Minister
declared that the conference sought "neither to deny nor prove the Holocaust, but to
provide an appropriate scientific atmosphere for scholars to offer their opinions in freedom about a historical issue."
Notable attendees included David Duke (oh horrors!), Robert Faurisson, Gerald Fredrick
Toben, and Yisroel Dovid Weiss, a representative of the anti-Zionist Jewish sect, Neturei Karta.

The western Piranha Press widely condemned the gathering as a
"Holocaust Denial" TMconference. Among the pathetic grovelers to obediently express their "shock" and dismay were
Pope Benedict, President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair.
Although the conference itself generated much controversy and negative publicity, the data presented and the opinions expressed
during the meeting were blacked-out by the Judenpresse. Isn't that interesting?

After Ahmadinejad’s re-election in 2009, CIA-NGO
"color revolution" attempt broke out "spontaneously." College kiddies and remnants of the old "pro-western"
ruling class took to the streets claiming that Ahmadinejad’s re-election had been tainted by "voter-fraud." Recall the "international
outrage" over that fake killing of that pretty crisis-actress "Neda" -- a staged stunt which our man Ahmadinejad
called out as "suspicious." Little Mo held firm and
the Green Revolution fizzled out. The Soros-CIA-NGO gang
hasn't been able to bring it back since.

"Neda"
from Tehran and her comical fake blood / fake death act.

But our fondest memory of Ahmadinejad is that of the beautiful
open-letter from November 2006, that he penned to the American people at a time the Bush-Cheney-Wolfowitz
neo-con gang had a war option against Iran "on the table." Of course, Sulzberger's Slimes and the rest of the evil
Piranha Press deemed his letter "not fit to print" (or air) and totally blacked it out of public view --
save for a few bottom-page-posted versions which appeared on a few network websites. "Youse guys" were never supposed
to read this latter, and we suspect that most of you never even knew about it. An abridged version is pasted for you here
-- with a link to the CNN source at the end. It is a bit more lengthy of an excerpt than what we would prefer for our daily
briefing, but highly informative and well worth your time.

Ahmadinejad sure doesn't sound like
a "monster" to us. We
challenge anyone to rebut the logic and truth of his arguments. His case, mainly the "politically incorrect"
remarks about the terrorist state of Israel, are the reasons why this letter was given the Orwellian "disappearing"
treatment by the same crowd that loves to lecture us all on the importance of "a free press."

Were we not faced with the activities of the US administration
in this part of the world and the negative ramifications of those activities on the daily lives of our peoples, coupled
with the many wars and calamities caused by the US administration as well as the tragic consequences of US interference in
other countries; were the American people not God-fearing, truth-loving, and justice-seeking, while the US administration
actively conceals the truth and impedes any objective portrayal of current realities; and if we did not share a common responsibility
to promote and protect freedom and human dignity and integrity; then, there would have been little urgency to have a dialogue
with you.

While Divine providence has placed Iran
and the United States geographically far apart, we should be cognizant that human values and our common human spirit, which
proclaim the dignity and exalted worth of all human beings, have brought our two great nations of Iran and the United States
closer together. Both our nations are God-fearing, truth-loving and justice-seeking, and both seek dignity, respect and perfection.

....

We all deplore injustice, the trampling of peoples' rights and the intimidation and humiliation of human beings.
We all detest darkness, deceit, lies and distortion, and seek and admire salvation, enlightenment, sincerity and honesty.
The pure human essence of the two great nations of Iran and the United States testify to the veracity of these statements.

Noble Americans,

Our nation has always extended its hand of friendship to all other nations of the world. Hundreds
of thousands of my Iranian compatriots are living amongst you in friendship and peace, and are contributing positively to
your society. Our people have been in contact with you over the past many years and have maintained these contacts despite
the unnecessary restrictions of US authorities.

As
mentioned, we have common concerns, face similar challenges, and are pained by the sufferings and afflictions in the world.
We, like you, are aggrieved by the ever-worsening pain and misery of the Palestinian people. Persistent aggressions by the
Zionists are making life more and more difficult for the rightful owners of the land of Palestine. In broad day-light, in
front of cameras and before the eyes of the world, they are bombarding innocent defenseless civilians, bulldozing houses,
firing machine guns at students in the streets and alleys, and subjecting their families to endless grief.

No day goes by without a new crime. Palestinian mothers, just like Iranian and American
mothers, love their children, and are painfully bereaved by the imprisonment, wounding and murder of their children. What
mother wouldn't? For 60 years, the Zionist regime has driven millions of the inhabitants of Palestine out of their homes.
Many of these refugees have died in the Diaspora and in refugee camps. Their children have spent their youth in these camps
and are aging while still in the hope of returning to homeland.

You know well that the US administration has persistently provided blind and blanket support to the Zionist regime,
has emboldened it to continue its crimes, and has prevented the UN Security Council from condemning it. Who can deny such
broken promises and grave injustices towards humanity by the US administration?

Governments are there to serve their own people. No people wants to side with or support any oppressors.
But regrettably, the US administration disregards even its own public opinion and remains in the forefront of supporting
the trampling of the rights of the Palestinian people. Let's take a look at Iraq. Since the commencement of the US military
presence in Iraq, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have been killed, maimed or displaced. Terrorism in Iraq has grown exponentially.
With the presence of the US military in Iraq, nothing has been done to rebuild the ruins, to restore the infrastructure
or to alleviate poverty. The US Government used the pretext of the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but
later it became clear that that was just a lie and a deception.

Although Saddam was overthrown and people are happy about his departure, the pain and suffering of the Iraqi people
has persisted and has even been aggravated. In Iraq, about one hundred and fifty thousand American soldiers, separated from
their families and loved ones, are operating under the command of the current US administration. A substantial number of
them have been killed or wounded and their presence in Iraq has tarnished the image of the American people and government.

Their mothers and relatives have, on numerous occasions, displayed
their discontent with the presence of their sons and daughters in a land thousands of miles away from US shores. American
soldiers often wonder why they have been sent to Iraq. I consider it extremely unlikely that you, the American people, consent
to the billions of dollars of annual expenditure from your treasury for this military misadventure.

Noble Americans,

You have
heard that the US administration is kidnapping its presumed opponents from across the globe and arbitrarily holding them
without trial or any international supervision in horrendous prisons that it has established in various parts of the world.
God knows who these detainees actually are, and what terrible fate awaits them.

You have certainly heard the sad stories of the Guantanamo and Abu-Ghraib prisons. The US administration
attempts to justify them through its proclaimed "war on terror." But every one knows that such behavior, in fact,
offends global public opinion, exacerbates resentment and thereby spreads terrorism, and tarnishes the US image and its
credibility among nations.

The US administration's
illegal and immoral behavior is not even confined to outside its borders. You are witnessing daily that under the pretext
of "the war on terror," civil liberties in the United States are being increasingly curtailed. Even the privacy
of individuals is fast losing its meaning. Judicial due process and fundamental rights are trampled upon. Private phones
are tapped, suspects are arbitrarily arrested, sometimes beaten in the streets, or even shot to death.

I have no doubt that the American people do not approve of this behavior and indeed
deplore it. The US administration does not accept accountability before any organization, institution or council. The US
administration has undermined the credibility of international organizations, particularly the United Nations and its Security
Council. But, I do not intend to address all the challenges and calamities in this message.

The legitimacy, power and influence of a government do not emanate from its arsenals
of tanks, fighter aircrafts, missiles or nuclear weapons. Legitimacy and influence reside in sound logic, quest for justice
and compassion and empathy for all humanity.

....

Is there not a better approach to governance?
Is it not possible to put wealth and power in the service of peace, stability, prosperity and the happiness of all peoples
through a commitment to justice and respect for the rights of all nations, instead of aggression and war? We all condemn
terrorism, because its victims are the innocent.

But,
can terrorism be contained and eradicated through war, destruction and the killing of hundreds of thousands of innocents?

.....

What has blind support for the Zionists by the US administration brought for the American people? It is regrettable
that for the US administration, the interests of these occupiers supersedes the interests of the American people and of
the other nations of the world. What have the Zionists done for the American
people that the US administration considers itself obliged to blindly support these infamous aggressors? Is it not because
they have imposed themselves on a substantial portion of the banking, financial, cultural and media sectors?

.....

To sum up:

It is possible to govern based on an approach that is distinctly
different from one of coercion, force and injustice. It is possible to sincerely serve and promote common human values, and
honesty and compassion. It is possible to provide welfare and prosperity without tension, threats, imposition or war.

We should all heed the Divine Word of the Holy Qur'an:

"But those who repent, have faith and do good may receive
Salvation. Your Lord, alone, creates and chooses as He will, and others have no part in His choice; Glorified is God and
Exalted above any partners they ascribe to Him." (28:67-68)

I pray to the Almighty to bless the Iranian and American nations and indeed all nations of the world
with dignity and success.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad President of
the Islamic Republic of Iran 29 November 2006

There is a great
quote that has been mis-attributed to the French philosopher Voltaire. Though the French polymath
(a person learned in many different fields) never actually said it, the observation is profound and true nonetheless.
The Voltaire impostor said:

"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise"

White House Press Secretary
Sean Spicer did not criticize the Tribe in any way, of course, but he did inadvertently go off script --
which is still enough to merit a public flogging from the usual suspects.

The
Judenpresse feeding-frenzy proves "who rules over you." Though that quote was not from Voltaire,
the French philosopher (Image 3) DID author the following gems: ''They are, all of them, born with raging
fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit
surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.'' (Letter of Memmius to Cicero - 1771)

''You
have surpassed all nations in impertinent fables, in bad conduct and in barbarism. You deserve to be punished, for this is
your destiny.'' ('One Must Take Sides - 1772)

So,
what exactly did Mr. Spicer say to set off the Piranha Press?

Spicer: "You had someone as despicable as Hitler who didn’t even sink to using
chemical weapons. So you have to, if you are Russia, ask yourself: Is this a country and a regime that you want to align
yourself with?"

Poor little Sean. In trying to please and impress the chosenites with a strong denunciation of the hated Bashar
al-Assad of Syria, he dared to suggest that Assad is even worse than The Great One of Germany. Silly
Sean. I'm sure your masters appreciate your effort, but no one can ever bump The Great One down to 2nd place
on the all-time list of Bad Guys. Don't let it happen again!

Slimes' scribbler Michael Grynbaum's(cough cough) dramatic description of Spicer's "screw-up"
is typical of how the entire school of attack-fish responded. From the article:

"One day after he delivered a stunner
of a gaffe from the White House lectern — favorably comparing Hitler to President Bashar al-Assad of Syria,
then clumsily referring to Nazi death camps as “Holocaust centers” — Mr. Spicer gave an abject apology
on Wednesday, saying,

A "stunner of a gaffe?" Really Mikey? Putting aside the fact that the Holohoax was, well, a dad-gum
hoax -- it's obvious that Spicer was only referring to the use of chemical weapons during warfare -- which The Great
One never did. In no way did his comments deny the Holohoax or the existence of "zee gas chambers" TM. In light of the false belief that chemicals were used to kill "6 million Jews" TM, Spicer's comment was indeed awkward -- but hardly worthy of kicking-up such a firestorm.

Zyklon B was a pesticide used to kill typhus-bearing-head-lice, not people! That's why camp inmates had their heads
shaved too.

The most pathetic part of this spectacle-of-the-day
was Spicer's immediate, and oh-so-predictable, groveling act which followed.

Spicer:“It really
is painful to myself to know that I did something like that.”

"Painful?!" (palm to face, shaking
head, sighing) Did you cry over your sin? The article continues:

“I made a mistake; there’s no other way to say it,” Mr. Spicer said, his
face taut, during a scheduled interview in Washington. “I got into a topic that I shouldn’t have, and
I screwed up.”

His "face was taut?" (bent over toilet, vomiting) --
What a typical Washington weasel!

"Oh forgive me rabbi, for I have sinned! No one is more evil
than Hitler --- not Assad, not Qaddafi, not Hussein, not Putin, not even Kim Jong Un! Forgive me!"

It's not so bad, Sean. At least
a chunk of your income wasn't chopped off by the fearful owner of Amazon (but I digress). Even if Mordecai
& Esther, er, Jared & Ivanka eventually replace you with someone more telegenic and with a stronger presence,
you'll be fine. As long as you stay on your knees and keep that theatrical "taut face" on during your apologetic
self-flagellation, the insiders will always take care of their own.

We too are "sorry" --- sorry we didn't write THE BAD WAR many years ago!

Boobus
Americanus
1: What do you think about Sean Spicer putting his foot in his mouth by saying that Hitler didn't use
chemical weapons?

Boobus
Americanus
2: He needs to be replaced. You can't make mistakes like that. But at least he apologized.

Sugar: Boobuss, you frickin' credulouss cretin!!! The only 'chemical weapon' that the Great Oneever ussed was life-ssaving
bug sspray!!!

Editor: You know, Sugar, if you hadn't been spayed, we could be making a fortune selling
Hitler-kittens sired from your boyfriends to our readers!

The United States
aircraft carrier Carl Vinson in Busan, South Korea, in March.

New York Times:U.S. Reroutes Warships Toward Korean Peninsula
in Show of Force

By MARK LANDLER and CHOE
SANG-HUN

REBUTTAL BY

Regardless of what one may think of the North Korean system
-- and we suspect, as rare western visitors to the country have alleged, that the situation is not quite as bad as what the
Piranha Press leads us to believe -- North Korea poses no threat of any kind to any of its neighbors. So then, why the harsh
sanctions and perennial warmongering toward North Korea by the Globalist-Zionist Axis of Evil? There are two familiar reasons:

1. North Korea fiercely guards its sovereignty and has no use
for The New World Order.

2. Israel
regards North Korea as an enemy state because it sells advanced technology to Syria, Egypt and Iran. (here)

It's
that simple.

It's them --- it's them --- it's
always bloody them!

Such is Israel's hatred for North Korea that it murdered 10 visiting North Korean scientists / technicians
during an air-strike on an alleged Syrian nuclear reactor in 2007. (here) But you didn't hear of this event on the "Fake News" because we aren't supposed to know
that America's perpetual wars have anything to do with eliminating Israel's innocent enemies. From The Great One
of Germany, to Hussein of Iraq, to Qaddafi of Libya, to Assad of Syria,
to Kim of North Korea, it's always some phony pretext about "human rights" or "weapons of
mass destruction" that's fed to us as the reason for hating on the "bad-guy-of-the-month." And with every "regime
change," the usual suspects will pop open a bottle of Manischewitz and drink and masturbate to the death of yet another
"evil dictator" as TV-addicted Boobus Americanus cheers: USA! USA! USA!

1- Operation Orchard was
blacked out of the Israeli and US press for 7 months, even though the CIA knew that it had happened. Most of the dead were
North Koreans. 2.Trumpstein-Satanyahu-Kushner-Ivanka are now simultaneously threatening
the same two countries that were targeted by Operation Orchard -- North Korea and Syria.

How conveeenient, as the "Church
Lady" of old Saturday Night Live fame used to say.

*

This piece by Slimes' scribbler Mark Landler(cough cough) offers up the usual disinformation regarding true motives behind Trumpstein's sabre-rattling across the Pacific Ocean. Let's examine just a few lines.

Landler: President Trump’s deployment of
an aircraft carrier to the waters off the Korean Peninsula
...

Analysis:
Isn't it interesting how Sulzberger's Slimes and the rest of the Piranha Press, in the wake of Trumpstein's recent warmongering,
have started respectfully referring to him more and more as "President Trump" and less and less as "Mr. Trump?"

Landler: But
the show of American force conceals a lack of better options for dealing with the provocations of the rogue government in
North Korea.

Analysis: What "provocations?" Why is North Korea a "rogue government?" Unlike Israel and its America attack-bitch, North Korea has neither
attacked nor threatened any other nation. To the contrary, the North Koreans have expressed a desire to sit down and talk
with Trumpstein.

Landler: China’s president, Xi Jinping, did
not make any public commitment to tighten the pressure on North Korea during his meeting in Palm Beach, Fla., last week
with President Trump. Even privately, officials said, he was circumspect.

Analysis: In other words, China
knows that the North-Korea is harmless and should be left alone.

1.Mark Landler (cough cough) conceals the real reason behind Trumpstein's foreign policy. 2. China and North Korea
have good relations.3. Trumpstein's missile attack on Syria occurred while the Chinese
President was a guest in his Florida home! Undaunted by the classless attempt at intimidation, Jinping has since responded
by placing 150,000 troops on the North Korean border (here).

Landler: And an attack on North Korea carries far greater risk than the missile
strike ordered last week to punish President Bashar al-Assad of Syria

Analysis: Darn right, it's risky. North Korea has "nukes" and a super-powered
friendly neighbor to its north (China).

Landler: .. to punish President Bashar al-Assad of Syria for his deadly
chemical weapons attack.

Analysis: Liar! The attack was a false-flag -- if it even happened at all.

Landler: The White House is
likely to pursue so-called secondary sanctions, which target Chinese firms and banks that help North Korea earn foreign
currency and finance its weapons programs. The question is whether the Chinese government will cooperate with the effort,
and if it does not, whether Mr. Trump will impose the sanctions unilaterally, even at the risk of rupturing the relationship
between Washington and Beijing.

Analysis: The North-Korea-hating Zionists don't care if we end up at war with
China. And pay no mind to the dangerous disinformation we keep hearing about how China has grown sick & tired of North
Korea's antics and wants to see the Kim Dynasty fall. The two nations have, since 1961, been party
to the Sino-North Korean Mutual
Aid and Cooperation Friendship Treaty, whereby China is bound to render military aid
by all means to North Korea against any outside attack. This treaty was extended twice and is currently valid until 2021.
(here) -- Funny how Landler and his ilk never seem to mention that Treaty.

***************************

As it is in Syria, so too it is in the Korean peninsula. We are just
one Israeli false-flag attack from being stampeded into another "Remember the Maine" moment. Such a stunt would
actually be easier to pull-off under Korean waters than on Syria's land. You see, Israel's state-of-the-art submarines,
sold to them at a deep-discount by the pathetic Germans, have the capacity to prowl all of the world's waters and even launch
missiles. Who would dare to accuse "our ally" of taking out an American vessel in Korean waters? Or of hitting Hawaii?
No, sir. That would be "anti-Semitic," don't you know?

We are not predicting this nightmare submarine scenario. Suffice it
to say that the arrival of American warships in Korea and China's front yard will be an event fraught with danger on
many levels. Thank you, President Kushner.

The public has already been conditioned
to fear North Korean submarine and missile attacks. Who would ever suspect Israel?

Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in today's New York Times that Trump is sending warships to the Korean peninsula.

Stephen Bannon,
left, and Jared Kushner in the Oval Office. Tensions have been growing between Bannon, President Trump’s chief strategist,
and Kushner, his son-in-law and senior adviser.

New York Times:In Battle for Trump’s Heart and Mind,
It’s Bannon vs. Kushner

By MAGGIE HABERMAN, JEREMY
W. PETERS and PETER BAKER

REBUTTAL BY

The "conventional wisdom" TM
among both the Establishment Piranha Press and the "Alternative Media" TM holds that "nationalist" Steve Bannon and libtard Jared Kushner
(cough cough) are locked in a heated personal battle for the "heart and mind" of Donald
Trumpstein. The belief is that Kushner holds the upper-hand because he is married to Baby Girl Ivanka Trump
(converted cough cough) -- herself a top-level adviser to the President.

She went from using her name, inherited
wealth, and sex appeal to sell shoes and perfumes --- to possibly triggering World War 3. The ultra-libtard, Democrat, Jewish
bimbo Ivanka is actually advising daddy on policy decisions from her White House office!

From the article, a typical assessment
of the "power struggle":

"On
one side are Mr. Bannon’s guerrilla warriors, eager to close the nation’s borders, dismantle decades of regulations,
empower police departments and take on the establishment of both parties in Washington. On the other are Mr. Kushner’s
“Democrats,” an appellation used to describe even Republicans who want to soften Mr. Trump’s rough edges
and broaden his narrow popular appeal after months of historically low poll numbers.

In the middle is Mr. Trump himself, seemingly torn between the two factions, tilting one
way or the other depending on the day, or even the hour, while he seeks to recapture momentum after a series of defeats in
Congress and the courts. As he did throughout his career in business and entertainment, Mr. Trump plays advisers off one
another, encouraging a sort of free-for-all competition for influence and ideas within his circle, so long as everyone demonstrates
loyalty to him."

Sugar and I,
er, "The Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times no longer accept this narrative, for it implies
that Jewish kiddies Jared & Ivanka and their clique of New York Democrats have "won" the "heart and mind"
of Trumpstein. It suggests that Trumpstein is some malleable, weak-minded, weak-willed fool who can easily be played by the
30-something-year-old brat who dirtied up his daughter. No. We give Trumpstein far more credit than that.

We believe that Jared & Ivanka "won the battle" because the game was rigged
against the Nationalists all along. The object of the game was to paint the Democrat Trumpstein as a born-again nationalist,
then draw in Christians, pro-lifers, union workers, "angry White guys" and all the various sub-groups of "alt-right-wingers"
(including us, though we always had some doubts), and then discard us all like used-up lemon rinds soon after the
election --- making it look like the result of a lost "power struggle," rather than the calculated, pre-meditated
betrayal it was intended to be all along.

1- Kushner is purging the
White House and empowering libtards and warmongers 2- All three of Trumpstein's adult children are married
to Jews (youngest daughter Tiffany (not pictured) is dating a Jew). 3- Bloodthirsty Ivanka pleaded with daddy
to bomb Syria. She even tweeted her approval afterwards.

National Security Adviser General Mike Flynn is gone, his side-kick
KT McFarland is gone, adviser Kelly Anne Conway is no longer visible, and strategist/adviserSteve Bannon
is fading fast. Imperfect as they all were by our standards, those Gentiles
were at least somewhat tolerable, somewhat conservative, friendly towards Russia, and somewhat non-interventionist in foreign
affairs. Ascending in their place are the Jewish kids Jared and Ivanka, Economic Adviser and Democrat-Globalist
Gary Cohn (cough cough), Foreign Policy Adviser and
Bush-Republican-Globalist Dina Powell, National Security Adviser General H R McMaster (from
the Globalist Council on Foreign Relations), Treasury Secretary and Democrat-Globalist Steven Mnuchin (cough cough), and Kushner's 28-year-old "right-hand man,"
Avi Berkowitz (cough cough).

On the media front, Trumpstein no longer appears on the Alex Jones or Michael Savage
radio shows radio shows which
had helped him to get elected. Instead, the warmonger suddenly finds himself basking in the approving glow of positive
media coverage from the very same "fake news" that he once condemned --- the same "fake news" that gave
him billions of dollars worth of 24/7 free publicity during the campaign. There certainly was no "Ron-Paul-silent-treatment"
for Trumpstein.

A "power struggle," my
foot! Kushner's warmongering
Globalist-Zionist faction didn't have to win Trumpstein's "heart and mind." They had him by the balls all
along.

The nationalists never had a chance. Jared
& Ivanka's New York Jews were meant to be calling the shots. Above: young Avi Berkowitz of Harvard (cough
cough), billionaires Gary Cohn(cough cough) and Steve Mnuchin(cough cough) -- both of Goldman Sachs.

Boobus
Americanus
1: I read an article in today's New York Times about the power struggle among Trump's top advisers.

Your shaking-with-anger Editor
here simply cannot deal with rebutting the latest outrage from the Trumpstein / Kushner White House right now.
I just can't. What else is there to be said at this point, anyway? Sugar the Crazed Conspiracy
Cat will briefly and eloquently handle this commentary before we move on to the subject of today's
main rebuttal (just below), about the First World War.

Trumpstein! You @#$*&^ % ^&%$#@ (*&^%$#
&^%^$#!!!! And the same goes for that ^&%$#@&
^$%# jew son-in-law of yours!!!

*MAIN ITEM

FRIDAY
/ APRIL 7, 2017

Army
recruits filled a street in New York in April 1917 soon after President Woodrow Wilson declared war on Germany.

New
York Times:Should
America Have Entered World War I?

By MICHAEL KAZIN

REBUTTAL BY

As far as historical
accounts go, this particular piece about America's entry in World War I, submitted to Sulzberger's Slimes by Georgetown University
History Professor and"noted author" Michael Kazin (cough cough), isn't
so bad. Nonetheless, in spite of its relative objectivity, some important elements are missing. Sugar and
I, er, "The Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times are pleased to add a bit of much-needed
muscle to this skeletal narrative.

The
"distinguished" Professor Kazin from Georgetown only gets it half-right. The B-student from Rutgers and the crazed
Conspiracy Cat get it 100%.

(Yet Kazin rakes in millions of dollars while we have to plead for donations and book sales! (hint-hint)
Go figure.)

Kazin: One hundred years ago today,
Congress voted to enter what was then the largest and bloodiest war in history. Four days earlier, President
Woodrow Wilson had sought to unite a sharply divided populace with a stirring claim that the nation “is
privileged to spend her blood and her might for the principles that gave her birth and happiness and the peace which she
has treasured.”

Analysis: Nothing wrong with what Kazin wrote in those two sentences, but
get a load of Woody Wilson gleefully spewing idiotic platitudes about "spending the blood" of young American men
for the sake of "principles" and "peace." Disgusting.

Kazin: The war lasted only another
year and a half, but in that time, an astounding 117,000 American soldiers were killed and 202,000 wounded.

Analysis:
Horrible numbers, yet only a fraction of what each of the major European powers lost in that bloodbath. What a tragic
waste!

Kazin: Still, most Americans know little about why the United States fought in World War I, or
why it mattered...World War I is less easy to explain (than World War II).

Analysis: Actually,
Professor Pointyhead,World War I is very easy to explain. Here it is in just 111 words:

*****

The Jewish Globalists wanted to restructure
the sovereign states of Europe along Communist and/or "democratic" lines -- while the Jewish Zionists (many
of whom were also Globalists) wanted to crush the Turkish Empire (which was allied with Germany & Austria-Hungary)
so that Palestine could be stolen on their behalf.

Toward those evil ends, the main states of Europe were
pitted against each other in a game of mutual destruction in which the sole innocent party was Germany. Under false
pretenses, the US was brought into the war, on the side of Britain and France, only after the British agreed to steal Palestine
from Turkey and allow Jews to start settling there.

*****

Bada bing, bada boom -- done!

Kazin: America intervened nearly
three years after it began, and the “doughboys,” as our troops were called, engaged in serious combat for only
a few months. More Americans in uniform died away from the battlefield — thousands from the Spanish flu — than
with weapons in hand.

Analysis: Kazin neglects to mention that the "Spanish"-flu
(which actually originated at a US Army base in Kansas) had all the indications of a US-engineered bio-weapon --
one that killed many Germans before getting out of hand and killing as many as 75-100 MILLION people worldwide!

Kazin:
After victory was achieved, Wilson’s audacious hope of making a peace that would advance democracy and national self-determination
blew up in his face when the Senate refused to ratify the treaty he had signed at the Palace of Versailles.

Analysis:
Kazin makes it sound as if Wilson was a well-meaning idealist who screwed things up. In reality, Wilson (a black-mailed
puppet of the Big Jews), wasn't out to "advance democracy and self-determination." Those high-sounding platitudes
were just bits of bait to lure in starry-eyed suckers. The real plan for the post-war world was to begin the drive towards
world government -- a New World Order whose real purpose, ironically, is and has always been to impose a
global structure that is very anti-democratic and anti- "national self determination."

"...Occasionally,
on a Saturday morning in the summer of 1912, Bernard Baruch would walk into the Democratic Headquarters
with Woodrow Wilson in tow, leading him like one would a poodle on a string. Wilson
would be quite solemn-faced in appearance....According to my friend Wilson would be given his special "indoctrination
course" in politics, by several of the top advisers assembled there. The course consisted chiefly
of outlining to him and his agreeing in principle to: Aiding and pushing the projected Federal Reserve Bank
Legislation through Congress when Paul Warburg approved the final draft of the opposed Act, then being
worked on....(And) if called upon, to lend a sympathetic ear and aid indicated "policy" if war should
break out in Europe....Wilson dutifully received and absorbed his indoctrination, shook hands all around,
and then departed...."

Kazin: But attention should be paid. America’s decision to join
the Allies was a turning point in world history. It altered the fortunes of the war and the course of the 20th century —
and not necessarily for the better.

Analysis: The professor gets one right.

Kazin:
Its entry most likely foreclosed the possibility of a negotiated peace among belligerent powers that were exhausted from
years mired in trench warfare.

Analysis: Correct! Britain and France were seriously considering Germany's
request to simply stop the war and return to the pre-war status quo. It was only US entry (engineered by the usual suspects)
that encouraged the Allies to drag out the war until the "Yanks" could arrive.

Kazin: Although the American Expeditionary Force did not engage in
combat for long, the looming threat of several million fresh troops led German generals to launch a last, desperate series
of offensives. When that campaign collapsed, Germany’s defeat was inevitable.

Analysis:
True, but Kazin omits the reason why the great German Spring Offensive of 1918 (after stunning
initial success) ultimately fizzled out and failed -- namely, because Jewish-Marxist-Zionist Labor Union leaders called
for factory strikes right when Germany was about to win the war before the Yanks arrived. Adding to the internal
subversion were the Jewish-owned newspapers which suddenly turned pessimistic and negative on the war effort. After the war,
this undeniable Jewish subversion came to be referred to as "the stab in the back."

Kazin:
How would the war have ended if America had not intervened? The carnage might have continued for another year or two until
citizens in the warring nations, who were already protesting the endless sacrifices required, forced their leaders to reach
a settlement. If the Allies, led by France and Britain, had not won a total victory, there would have been no punitive peace
treaty like that completed at Versailles, no stab-in-the-back allegations by resentful Germans, and thus
no rise, much less triumph, of Hitler and the Nazis. The next world war, with its 50 million deaths, would probably not
have occurred.

Analysis: All true. But notice how Kazin references the "stab-in-the-back
allegations" without defining the context of the term in regard to the bizarre German surrender of November 11, 1918.
This clearly indicates that Kazin knows what happened but cannot (or will not) to tell us -- not if he expects
to keep his cushy tenured position at Georgetown.

Post-World War I cartoons depict the fact that Germany was "stabbed in the back" by home-front
Jews (Zionists and Communists) who wanted Germany and Turkey to lose the war.

Kazin: The foes of militarism in the United States had tried to prevent
such horrors. ... They mounted street demonstrations, attracted prominent leaders from the labor and suffrage movements,
and ran antiwar candidates for local and federal office.

Analysis: Again, all true. But Kazin makes it sound
as though only "liberals" (labor and women's suffrage) opposed the war, ignoring the fact that many conservatives
were also against Wilson's warmongering.

Kazin: They also gained the support of Henry Ford, who chartered
a ship full of activists who crossed the Atlantic to plead with the heads of neutral nations to broker a peace settlement.

Analysis: Kazin omits the fact that Henry
Ford blamed the "International Jew" for driving America into World War I.

Kazin: Once the United States did enter the fray, Wilson, with the
aid of the courts, prosecuted opponents of the war who refused to fall in line. Under the Espionage and Sedition Acts, thousands
were arrested for such “crimes” as giving speeches against the draft and calling the Army “a God damned
legalized murder machine.”

Analysis: Spot on.

Kazin: The intervention led to big changes in
America, as well as the world. It began the creation of a political order most citizens now take for granted, even as some
protest against it: a state equipped to fight war after war abroad while keeping a close watch on allegedly subversive activities
at home.

Analysis:
Spot on.

Kazin: The larger aim of American foreign policy under both liberal and conservative presidents
had remained much the same: to make the world “safe for democracy,” as our leaders define it.
To achieve that purpose required another innovation of World War I: a military-industrial establishment funded, then partly
and now completely, by income taxes.

Analysis: Spot on.

*****

Though
there is nothing overtly false in Kazin's piece, and it does offer up quite a bit of useful data, we still have to grade it
a "C-" for the simple reason that the unsuspecting reader will come away with the grossly mistaken impression that
American entry into World War I was a historical "blunder" based upon misguided idealism when, in reality, the event
was a stroke of genius -- evil genius to be precise.

Henry Ford knew the truth about World War I. Not long after Ford's death in 1947, the Globalists
seized control of his foundation and have used it ever since to promote the very Globalism that Ford had tried to expose (before
being pressured into shutting up).

*

Boobus
Americanus
1: I read an interesting piece by a Georgetown professor in today's New York Times. He makes a compelling
argument that Woodrow Wilson's entry into World War I was, in retrospect, a huge mistake.

Boobus
Americanus
2:Why did
we enter World War I anyway?

Sugar: Then, as now, it was the %$#@^*& %$#@!!!!

Editor: Always.

*

COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

Email address:

Comments:

greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

THURSDAY / APRIL 6, 2017

The
body of a child after a reported gas attack on Tuesday in the Syrian town of Khan Sheikhoun

New
York Times: Worst
Chemical Attack in Years in Syria; U.S. Blames Assad

By ANNE BARNARD
and MICHAEL R. GORDON

REBUTTAL BY

Oh look. The boys at LHS(Langley-Hollywood
Studios) -- using crisis actors and staged photos -- are playing the "chemical weapons" and
"dead children" heart-cards against Syrian President Assad, again. (Palm to face, shaking head, sighing)

DEAD BABY PROPAGANDA WOWS EM' EVERY TIME!

1 & 2: World War 1: The "babies on bayonets" hoax was used to inflame the world against
Germany.

3:Gulf War 1: Daughter of a Kuwaiti official -- pretending to be a nurse -- sheds fakes tears as she testifies
before the US Senate about Iraqi troops slamming babies on the hospital floor.

Flashback time; an excerpt from our popular piece: World War III For Dummies:

****************

SUMMER 2013: Phony Gas Attack Blamed On Assad

Predictably, and right on cue, an alleged 'gas attack' of dubious origin occurs in Syria
- just a few weeks after Obama's warning! It is claimed in the
hysterical Western Yellow Press that children were among the victims of Assad's "gas."

"Now
children. We are going to play the sleepy-sleepy game now. Everyone lay down and close your eyes."

Images of the "poison gas" attacks had a fake, staged quality to them. Did the attacks
actually happen? If so, would it not have been more to the 'rebel's' advantage to blame Assad and draw
the US directly into the conflict?

SUMMER 2013: Assad Denies the Accusation

President Assad strongly denies the accusation
and invites an international investigation into the alleged occurrence. Assad compares the accusation
to the false claims of "Weapons of Mass Destruction" which were leveled against Iraq in 2002
& 2003.

It wasn't the first time
that the US government and the New York Times tried to lie America into a war.

SUMMER 2013: American-Jewish
Lobby OPENLY Demands War

The leaders of the America's major Jewish organizations combine
to issue a joint statement in support of waging war against Syria. The Washington Post refers to the Israel Lobby's campaign
for war as "full court press."

The American public awakens from its slumber and begins inundating White House and Congressional
switchboards with angry phone calls against the war.

Angry Americans show up at a 'town hall'
to rip John McCain a new butt-hole over his support for bombing Syria.

****************

Four years have passed since Obongo blinked at the prospect of World War 3 and a new
President now sits in the White House. Yet, the great game for Greater Israel, with all its component stunts and scams, continues
-- only this time, with what now appears to be a committed Zionist in the White House, rather than a reluctant one.
Trumpstein's harsh and accusatory condemnation of an attack that he surely knows to be fake is not a good sign: Without
a shred of evidence, and in spite of Syrian denials, the dishonest combed-over clown declared of the stunt:

"A chemical attack that was so horrific, in Syria, against innocent people, including
women, small children and even beautiful little babies --- their deaths was
an affront to humanity. These heinous actions by the Assad regime cannot be tolerated. ... It crossed a lot
of lines for me. When you kill innocent children, including little babies,
with a chemical gas that is so lethal-- that crosses many many lines -- beyond a red line. That attack on
children has had a big impact on me...

My attitude
towards Syria and Assad has changed very much."

How soon will it be before his Trumpstein's "attitude" on Russia and Putin
also "change very much?"

Trumpstein's own
language towards Syria and North Korea has painted him into a corner. What will he do when the next stunt is staged... and
the next? Surely, a man as cunning and as egoistic as Trumpstein must have figured out by now that the only way to salvage
his troubled Presidency and maintain
his name-brand for posterity is to become a wartime President. Should Trumpstein attempt to deliver the head of Assad to the Jewish Mafia on a silver
platter, "youse guys" just watch and see how quick the 'anti-Trump" Piranha Press, the Republican'tsand even the Demonrats
all do an "about face" and rally around the twittering buffoon.

Will Trumpstein finally pull that Syrian trigger that Obongo couldn't? How conveenient
that US troops are now in Syria -- sent there by Trumpstein / Kushner to ostensibly confront the phony "beheaders"
of mercenary ISIS -- but actually to overthrow Russian-backed Assad.

The scam worked!

Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in the New York Times today that the recent gas attack on babies in Syria has caused Trump to
change his opinion of Syrian President Assad.

Boobus
Americanus
2:Assad has got to go. The civilized world
cannot tolerate the killing of innocent babies.

Sugar: But it'ss tolerable when innocent babiess are ACTUALLY killed by frickin' US bombss, droness or ssanctionss --
or if they are dissmembered in the mother'ss womb. Ain't that right, Boobuss?!

Editor: You hoisted Boobus on his own bayonet! Well
done, Sugar.

*

COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

Email address:

Comments:

greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

WEDNESDAY / APRIL 5, 2017

New York Times: Dwindling Odds of Coincidence

By
CHARLES BLOW

REBUTTAL BY

Charles Blow
is the "affirmative action" house-negro at Sulzberger's ironically and noticeably non-diverse
Jew York Slimes. A divorced father of three, he is also an admitted "bi-sexual" and a graduate of all-Black
Grambling State University. And, of course, he hates Trumsptein -- or rather, to be more precise, the many millions of White
people who think Trumpstein represents their interests.

For his service to "Massa" Sulzberger, the pet token house-negro is given New York Slimes bestseller status
and TV appearances.

Blowhard: We are still not conclusively
able to connect the dots on the question of whether there was any coordination or collusion between members of Donald Trump’s
campaign ....

Rebuttal:Never mind connecting
these "dots" -- tell us what "dots" even exist in the first place.

Blowhard: .. and the Russians who
interfered in our election to benefit him, ....

Rebuttal: What evidence do you have that the Russians "interfered."
Define this "interference."

Blowhard: ... but those dots do continue to multiply at an alarming rate.

Rebuttal:
If the "dots" are indeed "multiplying," then you should be able to point out a few of these "dots"
for us. Please enlighten us, Mr. Blowjob.

Blowhard: First, and we have to keep saying this
because this fact keeps getting obscured in the subterfuge of deflection, misdirection and ideological finger-pointing about
what has yet to be proven: It is absolutely clear that the Russians did interfere in our election.

Rebuttal:
If Russian "interference" is as "absolutely clear" as you say it is, then show us the "dots."

Blowhard:This is not a debatable issue.

Rebuttal: Ah yes!The good ol' "this is not open to debate trick" -- an effective rhetorical
device for the manipulation of the simple-minded, but it has nothing to do with evidence. Show us the "dots," please.

Blowhard: This
is not fake news.

Rebuttal: That's
all well and good, Mr. Blowjob. But we are still waiting for you to cite a single one of these "dots."

Blowhard: This
is not a witch hunt.

Rebuttal: Show us the damn "dots!"

Blowhard: This happened.

Rebuttal: The
"dots," you weasel-worded son-of-a-whore! Give us the frickin' "dots!"

Blowhard: The investigations, rightly,
are seeking to figure out exactly how and to what degree, and those questions obviously depend on knowing more about campaign
contacts with Russian meddlers.

Rebuttal: Don't change the subject, sodomite! Give us the "dots," ---
just one!

Blowhard:
We continue to learn of new contacts between people in Trump’s orbit and Russians during the campaign.

Rebuttal:
We do? We must have missed these discoveries.
Exactly what have you "learned of," Mr. Blowjob, and from where?

Blowhard: Last week we learned from The New York
Times:

Rebuttal:
A Slimes scribbler cites another Slimes' scribbler as his source. Are you bloody serious, Blowhard?! Dear Lord,
having to read and rebut this deceitful dung every day is going to give us a heart attack.

Classic
circular logic --- After finding no "dots" to reveal a Putin-Trump conspiracy, Blowhard uses the unfounded allegations
of his own newspaper to "prove" that he (a writer for the same newspaper!) is correct.

Blowhard (quoting his own newspaper): “Michael T. Flynn,
the former national security adviser, has offered to be interviewed by House and Senate investigators who are examining the
Trump campaign’s ties to Russia in exchange for immunity from prosecution, according to his lawyer and a congressional
official.”

Rebuttal: So, General Flynn has been called to testify by the very same witch-hunters who
invented the "Russian interference" scandal to begin with. This proves what, exactly, Mr. Blowjob?

Blowhard:
This signals another area of possible collusion.

Rebuttal:
Could you define what you mean by "collusion?" But first, and pardon the redundancy here, show us the damn "dots!"

Blowhard: There is something here,
but I can’t yet put my finger on what it is.

Rebuttal: So, you "can't yet put" your excrement-stained finger on it, eh Blowjob? In other
words, you have no "dots!" Game over, sodomite.

Blowhard: To be sure, Donald Trump is a despicable
man and an awful president who deserves whatever he gets. He is crude, a liar, a bully and a cheat. He is vainglorious and
vengeful.

It is not clear to me that
America — and indeed the world — can survive a full-term Trump presidency.

Translation: There
it is! The true purpose behind the invention of the fake Russia/Trump scandal is to cripple and impeach Trumpstein
-- and, in so doing, further isolating Putin, saving Obongo's domestic "legacy," putting the Congress and / or Senate
back under Communist Demonrat control after the 2018 mid-term elections, and finally, installing a Communist female in
the White House after the 2020QFS (Quadrennial Freak Show).

Now that's
how you connect "dots," Mr. Blowjob.

**********************

Speaking
of "foreign interference" in American politics, when are we ever going to have an investigation
to connect the "dots" clearly revealed in the images above? (Clinton, Bush, McCain, Obongo, Romney --- Presidential
candidates all.)

Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in the New York Times today about how the dots linking Trump to Russia are beginning to show
an incriminating pattern.

Boobus
Americanus
2: No nation should influence in the internal politics of another.

Sugar: Tell that to frickin' AIPAC -- aka the Issrael Lobby --- and its 100,000check-writing memberss!

Editor: A loony lobby that is pissed-off
at Putin for saving the government of Syria!

*

COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

Email address:

Comments:

greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

MONDAY / APRIL 3, 2017

Isabel Rose with her "daughter" Sadie (formerly Samuel) in their Tri-Be-Ca home

New
York Times: My Son, My Daughter: A Mother's Evolution

By JACOB BERNSTEIN

REBUTTAL BY

It's wasn't enough that the Jewish elite of Sulzberger's Slimes have "normalized" - no -
sanctified that fraction of a fraction of the general society who are tranny freaks. Now they are giving their all-mighty
blessing to the parental child-abusers who, by either criminal negligence or by deliberate design, are causing their own child's
mental / moral sickness.

The bizarre nightclub / cabaret performer Isabel Rose(cough cough) is an heiress to one of New York’s real estate dynasties. Among Ms. Rose's best known acts
is a 2014 video for her single “Trouble in Paradise” which features her cavorting about in a
rhinestone-encrusted outfit, flanked by a trio of Drag Queen backup singers. Now comes news, publicized with great fanfare
and evident pride by the notoriously attention-seeking Ms. Rose, that her 8-year-old son, Samuel, wants to be a "Drag
Queen" himself (surprise surprise).

Mom
surrounds herself with tranny performers -- little boy Samuel now wants to be a tranny. What a "coincidence," eh?

On Feb. 24,
shortly after President Trumpstein signed an Executive Order that rolled back federal bathroom protections
privileges for trannies, Rose published an open letter addressed to Ivanka Trump, in which she asked the
First Daddy's Girl to take a stand on behalf of parents like herself. The deluded drama queen wrote:

“We are both from prominent New York real estate families, we both attended private all-girls schools and
went on to earn degrees from Ivy League colleges, and we both married smart Jewish men and now have young children ... Ivanka,
put yourself in my Jimmy Choos (high-end fashion shoes) for a minute. What would you do if you were me? Because I know exactly
what I would do if I were you: I would take my father aside and explain that failing to protect innocent children’s
rights to use the bathroom of their choice is wrong and unfair and un-American.”

No, bitch. What is "unfair and un-American" -- and un-human is you enabling
and even encouraging your SON's mental sickness. And as the article itself goes on to reveal, it may have been more than just
your on-stage acts and videos with trannies that led to little Samuel's destruction. The psychological perversion of baby
Samuel and his subsequent "withdrawal" were deliberately engineered. Brace yourselves:

"As fervent gay rights activists,
Ms. Rose and Mr. Fagen joked to friends that evening that they were going to raise their baby gay but would “love
him all just the same” if he turned out straight. 'What
we weren’t predicting was door No. 3,' Mr. Fagen said.

It wasn’t just that their son, Samuel, wanted to
play mermaids at age 2, which led Ms. Rose online to numerous articles that described this as a typical
predictor of “gender dysphoria,” the mental state typically used to describe pre-transitioners.

It was also Samuel’s
refusal to smile for photographs with Lily and the violent tantrums that transpired while getting suited up for a relative’s
bar mitzvah.

'I’m a girl, Mommy,” Ms. Rose recalled being told, over and over.' ...Friends didn’t really know at first what the exact nature of the problem was. They
simply saw a child, according to Mr. Fagen’s close friend Mitch Epner, who was “totally withdrawn.”

When Ms.
Rose began to express the belief that Samuel might be transgender, friends doubted her. (More than a few also wondered
privately: Why does the dramatic stuff always happen to her?"

In a sane and just society,
this wicked monster, on the basis of just what this article alone has revealed, would have been arrested for extreme child-abuse
years ago, and the boy would be adopted out to a loving family. Instead, as the article describes, Ms. Rose has been exalted
for her "courage" TM and has become a heroine among the New York City jet-set
crowd. New York State Governor Andrew M. Cuomo actually called and congratulated the she-devil
on her letter to Ivanka.

1920's Weimer Republic of Germany -- the same tranny insanity had been imposed by the usual suspects.

More madness:

"Even Mr. Fagen did a certain amount of blaming his wife, which she
found surprising .......So Ms. Rose took the good-cop role, becoming the confidante her husband wasn’t ready to be.

On vacation in
Palm Beach, Fla., she took Samuel, then around 4, to the Lilly Pulitzer shop and watched with curiosity as pink poplin turned
a depressed child turn into a happy nymph. Back in New York, they watched David Bowie videos and went to the set
of Ms. Rose’s video, where the first introductions to drag queens like Hedda Lettuce were made."

Samuel is now Sadie, and
purportedly "happy" being a freak. And Sulzberger's Slimes, as part of the Globalist agenda to subvert the God-designed
emotional, mental and physical distinctions between the sexes -- which serve as the complimentary foundation of marriage,
family and healthy society -- is also happy to present this wicked cultural Marxism as "normal." You see, what scum
like Ms. Rose and Mr. Sulzberger really want is for your child to succumb to this Satanic insanity.

From
infancy, Isabel Rose sacrificed her son just to draw attention to herself. Governor Andrew Cuomo
and his ilk all think it's oh-so-"courageous" TM.

Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in the New York Times today about a cabaret performer that has a son that transitioned to female.
She published an open letter to Ivanka Trump asking her to tell her father to protect transgender rights.

Boobus
Americanus
2: Wow. What a courageous woman.

Sugar: Boobuss, you frickin' cretin! How is being a libtard in a city that is 75% libtard "courageouss?"

Editor: And amongst her Manhattan
millionaire elite peers, that figure is probably closer to 95%.