The Competitive Enterprise Institute released a new study finding that regulatory policy could inhibit the development of a generic market for biotech seeds once patents on those varieties expires.

Over the next decade, the patents on nearly two dozen of the most popular biotech crop traits will expire, and farmers in the U.S. and abroad are eager to get access to low-cost, generic versions of those seeds. But most biotech crop traits must be reapproved every three to five years, and the process requires applicants to have access to confidential business information held by the original product developers. This establishes a potentially impassable roadblock to the future of affordable, generic biotech products.

In "Is There a Future for Generic Biotech Crops?"CEI Senior Fellow Gregory Conko explains why the re-approval process does nothing to protect consumer or environmental safety, and he proposes eliminating the requirement in the U.S. and in important export markets abroad. "Maintaining product approvals in all the relevant markets around the world is an expensive and time-consuming process for the sellers of biotech crop seeds," says Conko. "So the re-approval requirement will only serve to protect brand-name biotech companies against would-be generic competitors."

Trade associations representing seed breeders and the biotechnology industry are now negotiating a contractual agreement through which generic breeders can pay biotech crop developers for needed regulatory data. "This agreement will be a helpful first step in creating a viable generic seed industry," Conko acknowledges. "But it is merely a bandage that masks a deeper regulatory problem. Without fundamental reform, regulators will be forcing farmers to pay much higher prices for generic biotech seeds."

"There is little doubt that American agriculture has benefited tremendously from the introduction of crop biotechnology. And more than 15 million farmers in 28 countries have found that biotech seeds help to raise yields, deliver important environmental benefits, and increase per-acre profitability," Conko writes. "But while producers and consumers reap tremendous benefits from the expiration of patents in nearly every other industry, the same will not be true of biotech crops if regulatory impediments are not cleared from the path forward."

Discuss this Article 1

Anonymous (not verified)

on Oct 1, 2012

Your sort of hyperbolic there.
One thing's for sure, as a grower I am behind Prop 37 all the way and will vote for it as will all my friends.

Reason? People are boycotting conventional ag for many reasons real and imagined. We want that market. Once conventional crops are labeled we will sell into the greatly expanded market for foods labeled "No GMOS".

Most of the reason submitted to be against 37 are B.S. that are designed to keep us a captive market for the GMO seed and chemical salesmen. I've had it with their "miracle products". They stink. Our animals get sick eating the residue that has glyphosate in it. Yields are nowhere near as good. Now we've got weeds the size of fennel that you need an ax to cut down. Their solution, new "miracle GMO crops bioengineered to resist 2,4-D.
Our market is young women. They will buy food for the next fifty years, for them self, their kids and their family.
They are boycotting GMO food.
This little video has been making the rounds. It's been viewed something over 26,000 times in the last week. Watch it and you'll see why we're for Prop 37. Google youtube then
"Genetic Roulette Movie" full length

One thing's for sure, as a grower I am behind Prop 37 all the way and will vote for it as will all my friends.

Reason? People are boycotting conventional ag for many reasons real and imagined. We want that market. Once conventional crops are labeled we will sell into the greatly expanded market for foods labeled "No GMOS".

Most of the reason submitted to be against 37 are B.S. that are designed to keep us a captive market for the GMO seed and chemical salesmen. I've had it with their "miracle products". They stink. Our animals get sick eating the residue that has glyphosate in it. Yields are nowhere near as good. Now we've got weeds the size of fennel that you need an ax to cut down. Their solution, new "miracle GMO crops bioengineered to resist 2,4-D.
Our market is young women. They will buy food for the next fifty years, for them self, their kids and their family.
They are boycotting GMO food.
This little video has been making the rounds. It's been viewed something over 26,000 times in the last week. Watch it and you'll see why we're for Prop 37. Google youtube then
"Genetic Roulette Movie" full length