Quebec Communist State

Who is Lisée?

Jean-François Lisée was elected the new leader of the Communist Parti Québécois on October 7th, 2016

On Friday evening, October 7th, 2016 in Lévis, Québec, the Communist and unconstitutional Parti Québécois elected Communist Jean-François Lisée as its new leader. The Montreal Gazette online (October 8, 2016 updated 12:12) announced that on the second ballot Lisée “squeaked to victory with 50.63 per cent of the vote” with “a turnout of 75.09 per cent”, “higher than in the 2015 race”.

The mainstream (controlled media) of the corporate socialists will never tell Canadians that the PQ’s 1972 manifesto plans a Communist state of Quebec with devolution of powers to Soviet-style megacities on the model of Moscow. Nor have they told you that Lisée himself is a Communist.

Flashback:

In 1995, at the time of the Quebec referendum, Lisée is a hired advisor to the Communist Parti Québécois whose 1972 manifesto, in French only, reveals to party militants (the far-left) the PQ’s true hidden plans for a fully Communist state of Quebec (i.e., the PQ itself is far left, a fact suppressed from the news). Free enterprise will be abolished. There will be socialist planning conducted by expanded and revalorized metropolitan regions. A form of Yugoslav-style Communism will be implemented with worker self-management.

At the present stage of the mass immigration which is harmonizing Canada with the Soviet Union, the metropolitan regions will be multicultural.

Government after a UDI will therefore bear no resemblance to Confederation. It will have no ethnic connection whatsoever to the self-government of the French Canadians. The French Canadians will indeed be just one more ethnic minority amongst the hundreds of unconstitutionally mass-immigrated ethnic minorities (i.e., majorities from elsewhere).

In Communist Quebec, the citizen will have his “place” and will not be indicating his political preferences to elected representatives, nor telling the planning “experts” what to do. If any vestige of a “parliament” remains, it will be on the Soviet model for the purpose of rubber-stamping the planning decisions of the experts.

Jacques Parizeau, leading the de facto PQ government, has put Lisée on staff, on taxpayer’s nickel, to be his 1995 referendum strategist.

Lisée comes up with:

[a] the tripartite agreement — a glitzy media-covered public “signing” by the three “separatist” political party leaders, of the scenario for Quebec “sovereignty” on a Yes. (Where there is no legal power to act, find an interesting “procedure” to distract the audience.)

[P.S. The third “separatist” leader, Mario Dumont, has no clue what’s really going on. He’s being taken advantage of, and doesn’t know it.]

[b] and, Lisée writes the 1995 referendum question.

P.S. again The 1995 referendum was more than likely very highly rigged.

A Communist Country from Coast to Coast

Jean-François Lisée is a “former” Marxist-Leninist “leader” who in his youth — like Gilles Duceppe (a “former” Marxist-Leninist-Maoist “leader”) — desired with all his heart and soul to make of Canada a Communist country from coast to coast.

Two quick sources identify Lisée with this objective.

The first is a book review of the French book by Jean-Philippe Warren entitled ‘Ils voulaient changer le monde. Le militantisme marxiste-léniniste au Québec’. My translation: ‘They wanted to change the world: Militant Marxist-Leninism in Quebec’. The pertinent extract of the review — again, my translation (original French below)1 — reads as follows:

“It is not a question, one would have understood, of the end of the affair. But as long as one is satisfied to seize the adventure of the extreme-left by its most delirious and most disastrous end (celebration of the regime of Pol Pot, sectarian organisational practices, the fanatic battle against the revisionists), one will not be able to understand the reasons which led a cluster of educated and politicized young people — today occupying eminent positions in the media, the universities and the political parties (Jean-François Lisée, Gilles Duceppe, Robert Comeau, Alain Saulnier) — to give body and soul to the construction of a communist society from coast to coast.”

The reviewer means coast to coast of Canada. (Obviously, at minimum, as there is North American Union and Western Hemispheric Union to be completed on the way to World Union, where all cultures and all races will be homogenized to eliminate any distinctions, and thus all trace of the ethnic principle of national sovereignty.)

My other quick source is a page from the French web site of the Parti Communiste Révolutionnaire (Revolutionary Communist Party) of 20-11-2005, being their Drapeau Rouge Express No 71 [translation: Red Flag Express No. 71. This issue explores the life of then recently deceased former FLQ terrorist leader, Charles Gagnon, (who was in fact employed by Pierre Elliott Trudeau and Gérard Pelletier at their pro-Soviet review, Cité Libre, along with his fellow future co-leader of the FLQ terrorists, Pierre Vallières, before the two “left” Cité Libre to launch their own FLQ terrorist cell).

In the course of its necrology on Gagnon, the Red Flag Express mentions both Jean-François Lisée and Gilles Duceppe. We now find that both of these men have been involved throughout their well-heeled careers in the so-called Quebec “secession” movement — which is a front to “negotiate” the dismantling of Canada for the EEC-EU system, i.e., for the Communist regional union begun in Europe and acknowledged by Mikhail Gorbachev as the “New European Soviet”.

In the course of its necrology on Gagnon, the Red Flag Express mentions both Jean-François Lisée and Gilles Duceppe. We now find that both of these men have been involved throughout their well-heeled careers in the so-called Quebec “secession” movement — which is a front to “negotiate” the dismantling of Canada for the EEC-EU system, i.e., for regional union. Both Lisée and Duceppe are involved in pulling off the North American regional union.

After the dissolution of the OCML EN LUTTE! in 1982, Gagnon went into self-exile for awhile in Mexico and withdrew from active political life. Contrary to a good number of former leaders of Marxist-Leninist organizations in the 1970s, who joined the upper spheres of the bourgeois political class after having atoned for their “crimes” and expressed their repentance (Gilles Duceppe, Pierre-Paul Roy, Jean-François Lisée and other Robert Comeau’s of this world), Charles Gagnon, evenif he too had disavowed Marxism, to his credit stuck to certain positions of principle: thus he always made a point of denouncing the hypocrisy of the bourgeoisie, in particular of the Québécois nationalist intelligentsia.

When the Red Flag Express refers to the “national question”, it means of course the “sovereignty” of Quebec. However, according to my original research, Quebec’s alleged hot pursuit after “sovereignty” is a front for getting the “negotiations” done to dismantle Canada for North American regional union.

We are expected to believe that these “former” Marxist-Leninist “leaders” “repented” of their “crimes” and joined the “Establishment” in politics.

I think that is a myth like the Cold War and the fall of Communism. These two men are carrying off the revolution, right now. They are replacing the population, changing the form of government, eliminating the national boundary (North American Union on the pretext of 9/11 2), altering the ruling ideology, forming the regional union.

Everything they are doing now in “Establishment” politics was their quest as Marxist-Leninists and Maoists.

Could it be that the Establishment has fooled the Marxist-Leninists? Or have the Marxist-Leninists fooled the Establishment?

In the end, will there be a power struggle between the Establishment and the Marxist-Leninists for control of the Communist region they will have worked so feverishly together to create? Perhaps a combination of Sino-Soviet military power, both of which are currently in expansion, will answer that question.

EPILOGUE: TRUE ORIGINS OF THE COMMUNIST PARTI QUEBECOIS – POWER CORPORATION OF CANADA AND THE FEDERAL “LIBERALS”

Read my exclusive English remedial translation of Jean-François Lisée’s “The Secret Committee at Power” where we learn that PIERRE ELLIOTT TRUDEAU and fellow REDS under Soviet agent Lester Bowles Pearson in the prime minister’s office of Canada, sitting on a “secret committee” on the premises of Power Corporation, ordered Communist Lévesque to organize and set up the PARTI QUEBECOIS …

Foreword

Blast from the Past

This very good post of mine from 2010 in blogspot belongs here at CANADA How the Communists Took Control. It’s further documentation proving the Communist nature of the Canadian Action Party (CAP) set up in 1997 by red Paul Hellyer, former cabinet minister under Soviet agent Pearson and Communist Pierre Trudeau.

The Canadian (Soviet) Action Party (CAP) was founded by Hellyer, a former Trudeau appointee (who now chases UFO’s and urges we humans to “partner” in “development” with aliens whom an ex-Air-Force pal of Hellyer’s psychically communes with).

Hellyer recruited staunch Vancouver Communist Connie Fogal Rankin, the wife of Harry Rankin who was barred from entry to the United States, to lead the CAP.

This is an episode from the positive Communist coverage of Connie’s attempt to con Canadians into voting Yes or No on the North American Union, which the Constitution of Canada actually forbids. Connie and the Canadian (Soviet) Action Party had the full support of the Marxist-Leninists, who cheered her on at her rallies.

* * *

On April 17th, 2008, the MARXIST-LENINIST DAILY published its coverage and support of the Canadian Action Party, then led by well known Communist Constance Clara Fogal Rankin, bull-horn in hand, Alex-Jones style, marching to demand a “binding referendum” on the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), which means on the annexation of Canada to the USA in a Communist regional union. That’s what the North American Union really is. Otherwise, obviously, the Marxist-Leninists wouldn’t support it as eagerly as they do.

“Hundreds of people participated in the rally demanding an end to Canada’s participation in the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), saying No! to a North American Union and yes to Canadian sovereignty.”

The article also reports that

“[t]he specific demand put forward by the rally was for a binding referendum of the Canadian people to decide whether or not Canada would continue to participate in the SPP.”

“The Canadian Action Party, the Marxist-Leninist Party of Canada, Green Party and Libertarian Party” sent speakers to address the rally.”

And, continuing:

“Pierre Chenier spoke on behalf of the Marxist-Leninist Party of Canada.

[I don’t suppose he’s the same Pierre Chenier of Paul Rose’s “Chenier cell” of the terrorist group which kidnapped and is alleged to have murdered Quebec Labour Minister, Pierre Laporte at the outset of the 1970 October Crisis under Communist prime minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau. On the other hand this Marxist Chenier who marched for the pro-Referendum gang on the SPP in 2008 has been a long-time member of the Communist Party of Canada and the Marxist-Leninists; he has sought political office many times in both Ontario and Quebec. He was 54 in 2008, 56-ish in 2008 at the SPP march. He would have been 17-ish in 1970. That’s about the right age for terrorist recruits. His occupation is that of a printer; would have come in handy running off broadsides for the FLQ… Does anyone have any more information? Is this the same Pierre Chenier?]

Marching with the Canadian Action Party in 2008, Pierre Chenier forcefully stated that Canada must get out of aggressive annexationist treaties such as SPP, as well as NAFTA and NATO … these treaties violate Canada’s sovereignty … Our Party will continue to go all out to build the unity in action of Canadians to defeat the SPP and this North American Union, he concluded.”

Did you get that? The anti-national Communists are claiming to support Canadian sovereignty!

They support an end to the SPP and NAFTA, which are the basis of continental merger and hemispheric union … on the way to world government, which is globalism, which is exactly what Communism was founded to achieve.

Chenier and Connie won’t be defeating SPP and NAFTA with a vote: the referendu, they demand on the annexation of Canada contravenes the Constitution of Canada which prohibits Canada’s annexation.

Thus, while seemingly opposed to “aggressive annexationist” action, Chenier and the Marxist-Leninists are in fact aggressively backing annexation by introducing the forbidden “option” of a Yes to it. Just like Communist Connie Fogal and the Canadian Action Party.

We are supposed to take at face value that Marxist-Leninists joined forces with the Canadian Action Party and other assorted leftists at a rally to demand a binding referendum on whether Canada should be annexed to the USA and that the Marxists were there to help save Canada!

Evidently, what they were there to do was to help shove Canada over the brink by encouraging naive Canadians to put the Constitution of Canada up to a crap shoot —

What else is wrong with this picture?

[1] The MARXISTS (via Fidel Castro) were behind the founding in 1959-1963 of the FLQ — the Front de libération du Québec, a terrorist group set up in Quebec to destroy the Constitution of Canada for an “open society” based in the FLQ’s understanding of Marxist ideology.

[2] The Constitution of Canada, as the supreme and binding law of Canada, by its own existence and operation, absolutely prohibits the annexation of Canada to the United States of America. Indeed, Canada was founded in 1867 to prevent annexation; this being the constitutional purpose of the founding statute, it is not merely an “option”. Forbidden means forbidden. A “referendum” on the SPP, an extension of NAFTA, and aimed to integrate Canada into the USA and Mexico, thus annexing Canada, introduces an option which the Constitution does not allow. For details on how the Constitution forbids Canada’s annexation, see my post “The Constitution 101: Canadian Federalism and Self-Government for Dummies“

The illusion of “democracy” is being used by the Canadian Action Party and its hard-core Communist backers, to introduce a highly manageable risk of tricking Canadians into voting Yes to annex Canada to the USA and Mexico.

Canadians foolish enough to believe in such an option and to vote in such a referendum would be shooting themselves in their political foot — to the absolute delight of the Marxist-Leninists.

Within just a few days after I located, and thank God downloaded, this rally-coverage page from the ML Daily web site, the page disappeared from its URL. It had been in the online archives of the Marxist-Leninist Daily (called the “Le Marxiste-Léniniste quotidien) in French:

The 2008 Rally to demand a “Binding Referendum” on the annexation of Canada was emceed by Canadian Action Party candidate, Vijay Sarma an anti-wihte racist who equates “white” people with “Nazis” (standard Commie line) and who married old-bag Connie (born 1940 and triple his age), in 2007. Vijay has thus sacrificed his fecund “Black Krishna” sperm to the Party for the greater good and (as implied by Vijay) the greater gratification of Comrade Connie.

Attack those nasty white people, Vijay! Destroy them, destroy their countries! Force them into a racist, anti-white, anti-national Red Region! Take their institutions from them, genocide them! Do it for Israel, Vijay. And your reward is in the sack. Er, I mean bag — er, I mean, oh well.

MPVij (aka Black Krishna) and Connie Fogal (wedding pic)

MPVij (aka Black Krishna) and Connie Fogal (wedding pic)

MPVij (aka Black Krishna) and Connie Fogal (wedding pic)

Vijay Sarma, Marxist child-groom and toy-boy, married Comrade Connie Fogal Rankin (born 1940)! Connie must be so glad that old man, Harry Rankin, finally dropped dead of a multiple bypass! But not without a last song good-bye. Connie hired a choir, no less, to bid farewell to die-hard Stalinist Harry at his 2002 funeral, with the Communist hymn, the “Internationale“.

The Toronto instance of the pro-referendum action was organized by Canadian Action Party leadership contender Wendy Forrest and Karen Wittke, using a Facebook group to summon participants for the rally.

But wait, I wanted you to see Connie’s wedding pictures because she got so much extra use out of that dress: as the demure guest of Conservative Constitution Party leader and U.S. presidential candidate Howard Phillips and his, believe it not, Conservative Caucus. From the far left to the far right, Comrade Connie’s got the big red Zionist North American Union covered!

Connie also partnered with Howard Phillips’s Coalition to Block the North American Union, backed by none other than Congressman Ron Paul (“Secession Is an American Principle: Ron Paul:com“)! … It would pretty much have to be … to get the North American Union done. Subscribe for that post coming up.

The Webster Library of Concordia University carries an official biography of Pierre Elliott Trudeau, circa 1976, published by the Liberal Party of Canada. A scan of same, an ebook in PDF format, and a searchable transcript are free for download (157 MB zipped), together with additional documents.

At the top of page 7 of this official biography, we read the following statement:

“As the [1956 electoral] term drew to a close, Mr. Trudeau issued an appeal to the readers of Cité Libre to support the Liberals in the provincial election of 1960. With the Liberal victory, the democratic and social revolution seemed underway.”

(Perhaps the Communist revolution seemed well underway.)

For Pierre Elliott Trudeau is obviously not a “Liberal”, as anyone can tell who knows his pro-Communist background and his anti-Parliamentary activities while controlling Canada. Just read his 7-part series in Le Devoir, “I’m Back from Moscow,” on the 1952 Soviet Economic Summit, and you will understand that Pierre is a Communist. (See the Library tab under Articles for my exclusive English version.)

Therefore, the foregoing, and other statements in Trudeau’s “official” Liberal biography, were clearly intended to lull the public into believing that Pierre Trudeau was, and had long been, a “Liberal”.

However, election year 1960 disproves the claim. In fact, it links Pierre Trudeau personally and directly to the Communist penetration of Quebec, which he facilitated with his “vote Lesage” article in Cité Libre.

This is clear from Chapter 6 of the 1972 manifesto of the Parti Québécois (for a Communist state of Quebec) entitled “The economic objectives of the plan”. Chapter 6 reveals:

“The notion of a Plan has been tossed around in Quebec. Since 1961, in one form or another, the elaboration of a development plan remained an objective for successive governments, except for the last which finally abandoned the idea. […] (p. 101)”

The idea of a Communist plan was not abandoned; but merely the attempt to do it while a Province of Canada. The Quebec referendums of 1980 and 1995 to “secede” were efforts to acquire all the powers necessary to pull one off.

1961 is year two of the Lesage “Liberal” government elected on the 22nd of June, 1960, in part at the urging of Pierre Trudeau. These are the very same “Liberals” linked by Chapter 6 to the economic goals of the “Quiet Revolution” in Quebec

“The desire to coordinate economic objectives and instruments of action was, at the beginning of the “Quiet Revolution”, all the more acute as Quebec had traversed the recession of 1957 to 1961 with difficulty.” (p. 101)

At page 102 of Chapter 6:

“The fundamental characteristic of a Plan is that all the principal agents of a nation’s economy agree periodically to confront their objectives, their projects or their proposals, then to render them compatible and to arrange their operations in consequence.”

At p. 103:

“What is revealed by this experiment of the Sixties, is that without the necessary instruments, a Plan will never be anything but a more or less inadequate study … The missing instruments are precisely those which result from sovereignty. As long as Quebec is not independent, as long as it does not possess all the fiscal, legislative and mobilizing powers of a Sovereign state, to wave the banner of planning is at best the expression of a great lack of guile …”

“… the Plan will materialize only in an independent Quebec.”

It would seem that the “fundamental characteristic” of the “Quiet Revolution” was an attempt by the Jean Lesage “Liberals” to construct a Communist Plan.

Moreover, Jean Lesage had been a federal minister under Soviet agent Lester Bowles Pearson as prime minister of Canada, before Lesage swapped the federal “Liberals” for the provincial.

Charles Perrault, President of the Quebec Employers Council, interviewed on the concept of the 1972 manifesto by French CBC (Radio-Canada) on May 9th, 1972, points out the kind of Plan intended by the PQ, at which a first attempt was made in 1961 under Lesage:

For all practical purposes here, they are going to give to the Government pretty much the role it plays in socialist countries in Eastern Europe. They are going to centralize production, they are going to construct coercive plans — uh — and for all practical purposes, as I said uh give to the Government total control. And one must expect that the, the, the economy will progress pretty much like that of the Poles or the Czechs or the East Germans.

This is not an indicative plan that we have here. This is clearly a coercive — uh — which ref — represents the kind of, of — of, uh — of system known in socialist countries.

But surely not, surely not (the kind found in) Sweden, and surely not in France, either.

Marxist sociologist Narcisso Pizarro, in the same radio round table, states without hesitation that the notion of a Plan in the 1972 manifesto is a reference to worker self-management — a form of Communism underway in Tito’s Yugoslavia since 1950:

“In another aspect, inspiration in the Yugoslav model: which is to say participation, co-management, self-management. Uh –”

In 1972, Yugoslavia still is Communist, under Tito.

Furthermore, the federal regime under Pierre Elliott Trudeau will “liberally” siphon federal taxpayers’ money to an organization called Praxis Corporation, infamous for promoting socialism by organizing “poor peoples’ conferences”. The 1970 conference proceedings of Praxis (Research Institute for Social Change) were published by Black Rose Books. The contents reveal that precisely the Yugoslav model of worker self-management (industrial democracy) is the model of Communism preferred by the Trudeau-financed Praxis for all of Canada. Says Chris Trower, United Steelworkers of America (Toronto) (p. 29):

“Yet the pursuit of this goal not just for ourselves, but for all mankind, is the only cause worth fighting for. It is in the belief that we are joined in that historic cause, that we must work to build an industrial democracy in Canada.”

The idea of Industrial Democracy is not new to Canada, nor is it a foreign import unrelated to Canadian realities. It was advocated in the Regina Manifesto of the CCF and even earlier. It now needs re-introduction, however, because for several decades the unions have avoided challenging the fundamental issue of ownership and management’s rights to exercise authoritarian control over workers and production.”

The CCF, in case you didn’t know, is the original name of the party that became Canada’s NDP, our New Democratic Party, a full member, like the CCF before it, of the Socialist International, working toward socialist (Communist) world government. The NDP is Pierre Elliott Trudeau’s real political home in Canada, not the Liberals, whom he merely infiltrated like so many other Fabian Socialists.

Included in the Black Rose conference proceedings of the Praxis Institute for Social Change is an advocacy paper entitled “Industrial Democracy: Where do we go from here?” by none other than our respectable NDP’er, Edward Broadbent, M.P., and future NDP leader, influential in the administration of the Socialist International.

Industrial democracy is precisely the form of Communism framed in the pages of the 1972 PQ manifesto.

“A preliminary investigation of the actual nature of the Praxis Corp. network reveals it to be the centerpiece in a broad-based, largely Rockefeller-inspired, conspiracy directed at all phases of the Canadian policy making process. Information on Praxis and associated networks gathered in Canada and gridded against the extensively documented activities of the terrorist controllers at the U.S.-based Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) both in North America and in Europe show the Praxis Corp. to be an IPS-Canadian front organization.”

The EIR concludes:

“This iden­tification, matched in turn against known official Rockefeller policy options for Canada, allows the ef­ficient assemblage of the complete profile of Rockefeller and allied network agencies of subversion directed at Canadian national sovereignty.”

The Rockefellers’ Chase Manhattan Bank was a co-financier of the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, along with Bankers Schiff, Warburg, Rothschild, and others.

Which raises the question: who, in fact, owns and operates Canada’s federal and provincial governments? For decades now, our federal and Quebec levels have colluded in illegal referendums to convert Quebec to Communism on the model advanced by the former Praxis, an alleged Rockefeller policy outlet.

Furthermore, the real goal of the Quebec “secession” front has been to restructure all of Canada through federal-Quebec “negotiation” following a referendum Yes.

The “Quiet Revolution” is not Over

The “Quiet Revolution” of the Lesage Red “Liberals” isn’t over. In his 2014 Liberty-Nation Project, Quebec city lawyer, “separatist” tactician and Communist co-founder of the Parti Québécois, Guy Bertrand, points out Quebec’s continued need for “sovereignty”. (It’s actually the Communists who need it.) However, the picture is shaping up.

The empty shells of the “radically revalorized municipal institutions” called for in the PQ’s 1972 manifesto (see “Democratic Communities, page 31) were created by the PQ in November-December 2000, without waiting to “secede”.

The PQ, as a rogue government legislating not for the governance of Quebec, but for the future dismantling of Quebec, created: “an array of regrouped and amalgamated municipalities” as called for (also on page 31) by its own manifesto of 1972. Obviously, that manifesto is current; it’s not passé or lapsed. In French, the PQ created “un ensemble de municipalités regroupées et fusionnées“. These are the “regions” that Bertrand is referring to in calling for a transfer of powers to them, aka “decentralization”.

This will indicate the determination of the Communists to in fact cause Quebec to “secede” to complete and implement these new Communist metropolitan regions. Which is what we really were forced to “vote” for in the 1980 and 1995 referendums. Not Quebec “sovereignty”. Not the independence of the ethnic French Canadians, but the dismantling of Quebec into a string of socialist banana republics, planned city-states on the model of Moscow.

With Bertrand, as with Parizeau and Lévesque before him, the real purpose of sovereignty today is not to defend the French Canadian people and their culture, but to transfer (decentralize) legislative powers to the new international, multicultural city-states, to replace Confederation. Says Guy Bertrand:

The reform of political institutions in Quebec must necessarily proceed by way of the transfer of governmental powers to the regions once the political status of Quebec is modified. Decentralization is the way to go.

“Decentralization is the transfer of governmental powers to the regions, with, of course, the necessary resources to exercise them, without which, it would be a useless transfer. Decentralization, let us stipulate at the outset, is not a transfer or a dilution of services, but a transfer of powers. The operation is not administrative in nature, but political in nature. It is not a question of restructuring the Administration. It is a question of restructuring the Government.“

Now, get this. Bertrand underscores that all the political parties in Quebec since the 1960 minority win of Lesage, have been planning to Communize Quebec the same way. At page 60, Bertrand says:

Even if all the political parties in Quebec, and that from 1960 to the present day, “were formally committed in their official programs to carrying out the transfers of powers to the regions” decentralization is still in the wings. Why?”

Those “missing instruments” are the legislative powers of the Province of Quebec, and of the Parliament in Ottawa, to be taken by UDI — a unilateral declaration of independence of the Communist state of Quebec, and handed over to the city-states, and to a new regional government, and undoubtedly, a world government.

“I had not believed, after the election of 1956, that the electoral conjuncture of 1960 would be as simple as it is. […]”

“It suffices to recall here that the Liberal Federation accepted the formula of a union of the democratic forces, whereas for all practical purposes this formula was rejected by the Action civique and by the P.S.D.”

Trudeau says later, obviously to hide the fact that he knows Lesage et als are not really “Liberals”:

“I would truly like to believe that the Liberals were perhaps bluffing when they agreed to negotiate, even outside of the Liberal party, a formula of union with the democratic forces. I also think that since the deaths of Messrs. Duplessis and Sauvé and the withdrawal of the Action civique, the Liberals are truly thrilled that this union did not take place.”

However, in the next segment called “The Democratic Bet”, Trudeau tells his readers to vote “Liberal”:

“And the corollary is that a certain René Lévesque – suddenly wishing to get into politics – finds it practically impossible to act other than within the Liberal party.”

René Lévesque was apparently recruited by the Lesage Liberals; he didn’t find himself unable to run for office with one of the Red groupings on account of their failure, according to Pierre, to put “democracy first”.

It should be evident that Pierre Elliott Trudeau recommended voting for a party which he had to have known was going to attempt a Communist plan.

It must also be clear that if Quebec supposedly required “sovereignty” in order to acquire “[t]he missing instruments” to construct a Communist Plan, it is therefore and always has been in the direct personal interest of Pierre Elliott Trudeau — who urged his pro-Soviet readers of Cité Libre to vote for the Lesage “Liberals” — to find a way to dismantle Canada to construct that Plan.

And therefore, Pierre Elliott Trudeau and the other Reds long at the federal level, would have to be aiming at restructuring all of Canada to facilitate “provincial” Communist planning.

Which is not to say that other motives are not afoot for the redistribution of legislative powers from Ottawa to Quebec. Without all powers in its hands, Quebec would be unable to redistribute them in turn … to a decentralized group of expanded and consolidated Communist metropolitan regions on the model of Moscow in socialist sociologist Maurice Zeitlin’s “Planning is Socialism’s Trademark” in a 1975 issue of the Communist Party of the USA’s Daily World.

It must therefore be clear that it is not “Quebec” that wants “sovereignty,” nor was Pierre Elliott Trudeau “fighting to save Canada”. He was working, in both the Justice department under Soviet agent prime minister Pearson, and then in his own regime as prime minister, to restructure Quebec and all of Canada for Communism, after a “Yes” in a referendum.

To cover his insider knowledge of the true nature of the Quebec Liberals, Trudeau demurs:

“But if I do not make them [these remarks], I would repudiate the long manifesto published in the above-mentioned issue of Cité Libre, and I would back away from the logic to which I risked being held by playing at “democracy first.” Because it is certain that if, for example, the P.S.D. had supported the union of democratic forces, and the Liberals had rejected it, I would today be justified in concluding that all sincere democrats would have to vote against the Liberals and support the P.S.D.”

“The net result is that the Liberal party has obtained at little cost the monopoly of the opposition vote.”

Pierre Trudeau’s official “Liberal” biography therefore links him directly to the Communist penetration of Quebec with a view to constructing a Communist Plan. It links him through his own article published in Cité Libre in 1960, “Notes sur l’élection provinciale” (translation: “Notes on the Provincial Election”) (Volume 11, Number 28, June-July 1960, p. 12 et seq.) in which he invites his readers of Cité Libre to vote for the Lesage “Liberals”.

Denouement

The electorate who unintentionally will vote for the Communists in 1960 were not, however, without counsel. Both Robert Rumilly and Patrick Walsh are present, trying very hard to warn Quebec voters about the leftist inclinations of their “Liberals”.

In his quite excellent public lecture entitled (translation:) “June 22nd 1960 — the Election of Jean Lesage: “a change of life”?”), Éric Bédard explodes the myth of a backward Quebec still used today to justify the Lesage Liberals and their call for a “revolution”. However, in 2013, Mr. Bédard, like the voters in 1960, discounts the warning. Describing the 1960 electoral campaign, Bédard says:

As for the scarecrow of Communism, the electorate hardly seems to have taken it seriously. Over the course of the campaign, René Lévesque was depicted a number of times as a crypto-communist. In a brief report on June 1st, the Montréal-Matin explained why “Pat Walsh, the well-known anticommunist leader, announced that he would campaign against René Lévesque”, as if it were normal to view René Lévesque as a Communist !

The final scarecrow of a Liberal party resolutely hostile to religious values and to the Church, is also brandished by partisans of the Union Nationale. At the very end of the campaign, traditionalist historian Robert Rumilly circulates a pamphlet in which he rails against free schooling, which would violate the rights of the Church. The principal targets of the historian are Jacques Hébert, Jean-Louis Gagnon1 and René Lévesque. On June 19th, he hosts a talk on the subject over the radio (broadcast from 9 stations, including CKAC and CHRC), publicized the day before in Le Soleil. The title of this talk, financed by the League for the Autonomy of the Provinces, is “The Leftist Infiltration of the Provincial Elections”. The ripost of Jean Lesage was withering. According to the report of the journalist from Le Devoir, the Liberal leader had declared: “He said that he had no lessons on Catholicism to learn from this “import” , that the French-Canadian people have for too long warmed this “viper” in their midst who today strikes it in its mind.”

Perhaps the intensity of Jean Lesage’s insult to Rumilly reflects the degree of accuracy of Mr. Rumilly’s political forecast with regard to the Liberals.

Almost as soon as Lesage got in, he kicked the Catholic church out of Education. 2 The nuns and priests who for centuries, and in Confederation since 1875, had propagated the culture of the French Canadians in their schools were no more.3 These, Lesage replaced with “imports”: a battalion of secular teachers of popularized Marxism. //// usherbrooke /// go look for it; this is the new Education ministry. ////

(Just a couple of years ago, a French Canadian Catholic woman ruefully told me with what grace the nuns and priests had withdrawn from their historic roles on orders from the new Lesage government.)

There was no “Great Darkness”

The 2013 lecture by Éric Bédard, excerpted above, is an excellent off-the-beaten track background to the 1960 Quebec elections. It was first delivered under the auspices of the Quebec library and archives (BAnQ), with a transcript now online by the Fondation Lionel-Groulx.

Using the Liberals’ own statistics from a survey conducted by the Liberals at the time, Bédard explodes the “myth” that the Quebec of 1960 was “backward” and needed to be rescued.

The election of the Jean Lesage “Liberals” on 22nd June 1960 marks the beginning of the alleged “rescue”, i.e.: Quebec’s “Quiet Revolution”. The period prior to the “rescue” is often called “la Grande Noirceur” (the Great Darkness). However, Quebec of 1960, according to Bédard, was neither “backward” nor in “darkness”.

Therefore, what were the Liberals really doing when they merely pretended to rescue Quebec?

Were they simply trying to justify the revolutionary steps they planned to take, not even mentioned in their electoral platform, and thus not sought by the electorate? These included nationalization of hydroelectricity (Power Corporation of Canada came by a tidy sum of cash on that occasion; seven years later, it would found the Parti Québécois on its Montreal downtown business premises), secularization of the public education system, and a secret design (not mentioned by Bédard, which surfaced in my own research) to attempt to construct a Communist plan to run Quebec.

The “myth” of Quebec’s backwardness before the 1960 Liberal win still commands the airwaves at the Communist Broadcasting — I mean Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.

“It’s 1960 and Quebec is at the dawn of the Quiet Revolution. A progressive, urban and modern Quebec is quickly overtaking the old Quebec, characterized as conservative, patronage-oriented, rural and under the thumb of the Roman Catholic Church” …

Bédard’s lecture is well written, amply footnoted, and my additional reason for enjoying it is that two of my anticommunist “old friends” have shown up: Robert Rumilly and Patrick Walsh.

Is Trudeau Really a Democrat?

Trudeau’s pretext for telling his readers to vote “Liberal” on June 22nd, 1960, is “democracy first”.

It was the “Liberals”, Trudeau says, who alone were willing to form a coalition to force Maurice Duplessis and the Union Nationale out of office. Because the watchword is “democracy first”, says Trudeau, the provincial “Liberals” have earned his readers’ vote.

This is a very nice pretext, in particular since Pierre Elliott Trudeau cares little if anything for “democracy” (at least as we envision it in our supreme Westminster Parliament of 1867).

In his 1977 book Viva Chairman Trudeau, commencing at the segment entitled “NDP Rule by Proxy – 25 April 73”, we have a portrait of the extent to which Pierre Elliott Trudeau is attached to “democracy” as a principle to influence the vote.

Excerpt:

Since the life of the Trudeau minority government depends on the 31 socialist votes in the Commons, what the New Democrats want they usually get.

The pattern of the informal coalition was set the very first day the 29th Parliament met.

From then on the Trudeau-Lewis organic understanding has been refined into a smooth symbiosis which is in fact giving the country NDP government by proxy. Quite an achievement for a party which polls about 17 per cent of the vote.

Handy Paradox – 19 Sept. 73

One of the paradoxes of the 1972 federal election is that the near defeat of the Liberal party has increased Trudeau’s operational scope.

Since his minority government needs the NDP votes in the Commons to stay in office, Trudeau can now explain his version of any portion of the NDP program as an inescapable tactical necessity to keep the Liberal party in power.

It wasn’t David Lewis or Tommy Douglas but Pierre Trudeau who hit upon the idea of using the Liberal party for pushing the country down the socialist drain. The fact that the scheme now needs open NDP support in the Commons simplifies, not complicates, matters.

Political Piracy – 20 March 74

Until the 1972 election, opposition of genuine liberals to Trudeau’s pre-conceived policies of armchair socialism managed to blunt or moderate the illiberal impulses of his administration. Since late 1972 this internal check has been rendered ineffective.

The survival argument smothers any objection to anything the Trudeaucrats present as necessary payment for NDP support. The slightest internal criticism of the Trudeau-Lewis symbiosis is easily silenced by a simple question: “Do you want our party to stay in power?”

Since keeping their party in power comes first with virtually all the ranking Grits, Trudeau is now free to impose on the country the framework of “socialist” policies he had trouble smuggling through in bits and pieces before the excuse of buying NDP support swept aside all objections.

The New Democrats find the arrangement ideal because it gives them more power than they could ever expect to get from their voting support, without at the same time burdening them with any of the responsibilities that go with exercise of power. What it all boils down to is political piracy.

Old Ties – 12 Dec. 73

A few observers are now coming close to my long-standing contention of Trudeau’s use of the Liberal party as a camouflage for NDP rule.

The latest discoverer of Trudeau’s capture and manipulation of the Liberal party for the socialists is columnist Charles Lynch.

“What we may be seeing,” writes Lynch, “is the re-emergence of Trudeau the convinced socialist, acting on the beliefs he held until he put them into mothballs when he joined the Liberal party at the age of 45.

“If this is so, as recent events suggest, it means that I have been misreading this minority … Parliament in supposing that a reluctant Trudeau was yielding to NDP demands against his will …”

A wisened Lynch then goes on to say that “the picture changes somewhat if we perceive Trudeau the socialist emerging from the Parliamentary woodword, using the threat of the NDP to bend, if not break, the moderate Liberals in his cabinet and his caucus, and happy to be getting on with the building of a Canadian New Jerusalem.”

This, of course, should have been obvious all along, and certainly since the 1972 election. Why, then, was the perception of virtually all our political commentators clouded for so long?

Lynch explains: “So much has been written about Trudeau the small-c conservative that we have almost forgotten his old political roots, which were closely intertwined with the latter-day CCF and the early-day NDP.”

It’s not the whole explanation. It leaves out the sad fact that writing about Trudeau’s political roots means risking ridicule, condemnation and ostracism.

Hypocrisy – 4 Jan. 74

Trudeau’s claim that the New Democrats are not directing the ship but following it is justified. He does not need them as navigators, because the general direction of their course has always been his own. But he needs them for a semblance of legitimacy of his continued command.

In that sense the ship of state has now been actually steered for over a year by the 31 official socialists in the Commons, for without their support Trudeau and his crew could not hold on to the controls after the 1972 election.

David Lewis’ claim that “we were elected to make parliament work” is cynical hypocrisy. Parliament represents the will of the people, not the will of any one of its members. In the 1972 election the will of the people signified rejection of the Trudeau regime, without conferring the mandate to govern on any other party. The New Democrats, who polled less than 18 per cent of the votes cast, certainly did not receive a mandate to defy the will of the majority of the electorate in nine out of Canada’s ten provinces.

Union Veto – 13 Feb. 74

By keeping in office a government rejected by the majority of the electorate in all the provinces but one, the New Democrats are not only in contempt of the democratic process but are now primarily responsible for the continued mismanagement of the country.

The Facade of Quebec “Separatism”

In closing, and in terms of a broader conclusion to be drawn from Trudeau’s 1960 support for the “Liberals”, the apparent “struggle” of the federal government of Canada, first under Pearson, then under Trudeau, and afterward under others, with a “separatist” Quebec, is a cleverly staged sham. It is meant to hide a confidence game and close cooperation among Communists top and bottom who have penetrated both the federal and provincial levels. They are manipulating their way toward dismantling Canada precisely to give each of the Provinces all the “instruments” necessary … to construct a Communist Plan.

And they are doing so with the full support of the family which has hijacked the Crown and Throne, and the democratic liberty of Canada.
______

1Jean-Louis Gagnon was a Soviet agent, one of many exposed by Igor Gouzenko. Gagnon escaped the Canadian “spy trials” (he fled to Brazil) with the help of Mitchell Sharp, the latter a future member of David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission and a future adviser to Pierre Elliott Trudeau.

Paul Gérin-Lajoie, 1960Lesage-Liberal election win

2 As Lesage’s brand new Minister of Education — a post not occupied since 1875 when the decision was made to restore Church control of Education — Paul Gérin-Lajoie, in the photo at right, was instrumental in evicting Quebec’s Catholic faith from the public school system. There had to be at least two purposes for doing this. First, mass immigration could not begin in earnest without faith-neutral public schools. Secondly, socialist planning in the future multicultural (non-national) city-states could not be done without city control of Education in order to train people for the jobs planned to be filled. Thus, the ancient constitutional right of the inhabitants of New France to preserve their faith and culture was eradicated in Quebec to facilitate their ethnic replacement, and fully planned socialism in a Marxist world state.

Gérin-Lajoie moreover knew full well what the effect would be of interfering with Education. In his 1951 article in French for the Canadian Bar Review (Vol xxix), “Du pouvoir d’amendement constitutionnel au Canada,” Rhodes Scholar Lajoie correctly observed (pages 1174-1175), translation:

Federal intervention in the field of education might undermine at their base all of Quebec’s institutions. The granting of federal subsidies alone might produce a small revolution. Imagine, for example, that the federal government decides to give a substantial grant to certain university faculties to the exclusion of other faculties to which the Province of Quebec attaches the greatest importance, contrary to the other provinces. The repercussions would not be slow to be felt in the orientation of thinking, the sense of values and, ultimately, the social institutions.

This is not to depict the federal government as the enemy of Quebec. Far from it! But the danger exists that in extending the federal powers into fields which are not purely economic, the new legislation might be oriented — quite unconsciously, perhaps — in a way unfavorable to Quebec. That is why the province is always concerned about enlargements of federal competencies, and why its government requires a right to control all such amendments.

What happened in Quebec under Lesage and Lajoie after their 1960 win was far more devastating than federal intervention or a constitutional amendment. With no hint in their platform, Quebec’s Red Liberals implemented their own “revolution” against Quebec’s ancient institutions.

Lesage called new Quebec elections in 1962. Says Wikipedia:

“In an unusual move, the election was called just two years after the previous 1960 general election. Lesage sought a mandate for the nationalization of the electricity industry, declaring it a single issue important enough to stake his political career on it.”

Two other “single issues” leap to mind which are more important, and for which no mandate was ever requested:

1). destroy Quebec’s public education system, designed to preserve the cultures and peoples who had founded Canada’s ethnic federation in 1867;

2) intent of the Lesage “Liberals” to construct a Communist Plan to run the economy, an undertaking apparently quietly begun in 1961 according to page 103 of the 1972 manifesto of the Parti Québécois.

I can find no documented source alleging that the voters turfed out Lesage in 1966 over the education reforms. The only reference to the subject at all says the Union Nationale alleged that Lesage would remove the crucifix from the schools if re-elected. I sense that this reference probably hides deeper public discontent which the controllers of the “Memory Hole” have left unrecorded.

3 In Part 2 of his 7-part series on the Moscow Economic Summit penned by Trudeau for Le Devoir i 1952, Trudeau summarizes his own and the visits of other Summit delegates to the various places of worship of the different denominations. However, he had to admit that for want of religious instruction (no doubt suppressed in the Soviet schools), mostly only the elderly still attended religious services. The destruction of the French Catholic education system by the Lesage cabinet in the early 1960s would obviously have the same effect here. Indeed, in Montreal, once called the “city of a thousand bells,” the steeples of its many churches have fallen silent. Said Trudeau:

Now, on high feast days, these temples are filled to bursting — but only by the elderly. Freedom of religion is therefore not extinct; but for want of religious instruction this Christendom is cut off from youth. Except in Georgia, however, where the young seem still rather devout.

Nota Bene: My discussion of this Brief follows below. (Admin. NSIM)

BRIEF

respecting

News-Slanting and Communist-linePropaganda on the CBC

by: RON GOSTICK of Flesherton, Ontario,
Editor of The Canadian Intelligence Service
and director of The Canadian Anti-Communist League

April 13, 1956

The Free World is spending immense financial resources combatting the international Communist conspiracy which already holds in slavery over 900 million souls. In Canada the struggle is yet a ‘cold’ one — a psychological, ideological battle for the minds and souls of men. Our defence, therefore, requires not only military preparedness, but full information and a thorough understanding of Communist strategies, tactics and propaganda.

The CBC should be our most powerful cold war weapon in the defence of this nation and Christian civilization. Yet, it is a disturbing paradox that as we spend billions of dollars in defence against the Communist conspiracy, the Number 1 weapon in our ideological arsenal, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, more and more reflects the leftwing, pro-Communist propaganda line.

Communist Propaganda Line

Perhaps the best approach to this question is to lay down the Red propaganda line, and then compare the CBC’s line with it over a period of years. The Communist ‘line’ in recent years has included:

3. Smearing and ridiculing of anti-Communist leadership throughout the world, while praising the fence-sitters and neutralists in the cold war.

4. Popularizing of a smear vocabulary — including such terms as: guilt by association, hysteria, witch-hunt, fascist, book-burning, reactionary, etc. — to be hurled at those who effectively oppose Red activities.

The CBC Propaganda Line

While it would take weeks of this Commission’s time to study even a summary of all the Red-slanted CBC propaganda of recent years, following are a few typical examples.

Oct. 15/50: Harold Isaacs promoted recognition of Red Chinese regime and its admission to the UN. Reds pictured as agrarian reformers (a few days later they carried their ‘agrarian reform’ into Tibet and then into Korea).

And during the past five years such propagandists as Max Freedman, Matthew Halton, Alexander Uhl, Frank H. Underhill, James McConaughy, Murray Balantyne, Maxwell Cohen, and many others, have used CBC “Capital Reports” and “Week-end Reviews” to attack and smear Senator Joseph McCarthy’s fight against Reds in the US Government.

Jan. 17/54: Roger Baldwin, chairman of the American Civil Liberties Union, and associated with no less than 40 Communist ‘fronts’ according to chairman Harold Velde of the Un-American Activities Committee, was a special CBC speaker. He attacked Sen. McCarthy and all congressional investigations of subversion; boasted that his organization opposed the prosecution of the Red leaders convicted in 1949, opposed loyalty oaths, opposed immigration policies which prohibit Reds from entering the US, and opposed US insistence on loyalty from her UN personnel.

April 15/54: Ralph Lapp, speaking from Washington over the CBC, defended Dr. Robert Oppenheimer, who had just run afoul of US security requirements through his long recorde of Communist association and support.

This last year, as the emphasis in the Red line shifted more and more to ‘peaceful co-existence’, this whole pack of CBC commentators has parroted the ‘line’.

Even in ‘drama’ we find the ‘line’. I shall not in this brief deal with the licentiousness and disregard for Christian morality in certain CBC productions. But it is significant that even in the drama section of the CBC we find the Red propaganda line. For instance, on the Sunday night (Mar. 17/54) CBC play we heard these lines:

” …You think he is a Communist? Oh, Joe, this isn’t the United States with its witch-hunting. This is Canada.”

The foregoing are but a few typical examples of the almost daily Commie ‘line’ carried over the CBC.

The Strange Case of Reuben Ship

CBC policy has perhaps never been more accurately reflected than it was in 1954 in the strange case of Reuben Ship.

On May 30, 1954, the CBC produced and broadcast a Commie-line propaganda play smearing Senator McCarthy and investigations of subversion, written by one Reuben Ship. A New York Times report (June 1/54) read:

“Canadians were chuckling today over the ribbing given Senator Joseph R. McCarthy in a burlesque of a Senate committee hearing broadcast last night. The broadcast originated in Toronto and was carried by the Trans-Canada network of the Canadian Broadcasting Company.

“The play was ‘The Investigator’ by Reuben Ship of Montreal, with John Drainie of Montreal playing the title role with such accent, intonation of voice and mannerisms of speech that many listeners thought for a time that they were listening to a recording of the Wisconsin Republican Senator.

“The play concerns an investigation ‘up there’ after the investigator is killed in a plane crash.”

And just who is Reuben Ship? The New York Times itself supplies the answer:

“Mr. Ship was deported from the United States last year as a result of testimony before the House Committee on Un-American Activities that identified him as a member of the Communist party.”

The files of the U.S. House Committee on Un-American Activities contain the following information on Mr. Reuben Ship:

He was a witness before this Committee during public hearings in Los Angeles, September 24, 1951 (Communism in Motion-Picture Industry), Part 5, pages 1771-1775). At that time Ship, under the privilege of the ‘Fifth Amendment’, refused to answer questions concerning present or past membership in the Communist Party.

Referring to the radio group of the Communist Party in Los Angeles, of wihch he had been treasurer, Owen Vinson gave the following testimony:

Mr. Tavenner: Ruben (sic.) Ship appeared before this committee last September and refused to answer any material questions that were asked him. Was he a member of that group?

Paul Marion, an actor who was a member of the Communist Party from early 1946 until early 1948, in listing for the Committee those members of the radio group of the Communist Party in Los Angeles to which he had belonged, named Ruben (sic.) Ship.

Mrs. Pauline Swanson Townsend, a member of the Communist Party from 1943 to 1948, testified before the Committee on March 12, 1953, that Reuben Ship’s membership card in the Communist Party was turned in through her branch.

William L. Alland, motion-picture producer and former Communist Party member, testified before the Committee on November 23, 1953, in part:

Mr. Tavenner: Now, will you tell the committee, please, what the principal activity was of this group of the Communist Party organized within the radio field?

Mr. Alland: Its principal activity was attempting to control the Radio Writers Guild … They wanted the Radio Writers Guild to try to get the Screen Writers Guild to be more lenient in its actions and attitudes toward the Communist members in the Screen Writers Guild. They tried to get its members in any way possible to censure and block the work of the Un-American Activities Committee, certainly, and to in any way possible aid and support those people who had been exposed by the committee …

Mr. Tavenner: Can you recall members of your Communist Party group who actually became officials in the Radio Writers’ Guild as a result of the activities of your group?

Mr. Alland: … Reuben Ship was an official …

COUNTERATTACK, the authoritative New York report on Communist activities, in its January 21/55 issue, revealed that the tape recording of the CBC production of “The Investigator” was sold to Ship, and from it a long-playing record was produced, handled in New York by Walter Colquitt and John Bubbers (B & B Recording, Inc.).

The Daily Worker expressed its pleasure over this CBC venture, boasting that the sale of records would not be less than 100,000 — at $5.95 each!

Thus did the CBC not only produce and feed to the Canadian public, at its own expense, a Red-line propaganda piece, but it also helped to raise funds for ‘Fifth Amendment’ Ship and his associates!

Reports indicate that there was a heavy mail sent to CBC Chairman Dunton’s office, protesting this production. One citizen who protested advised me that Mr. Dunton’s reply was to the effect that it was not proved that Ship was a Communist. A study of the foregoing testimony would indicate that Mr. Dunton has a cavalier disregard for evidence, at least when it concerns pro-Communist writers.

Overt CBC Communist Support

Following are a few examples of overt CBC support of the Communist conspiracy in Canada:

During the federal election in 1953 the LPP (Communist Party) was given free time on the CBC. At that very time thousands of Canadian boys were in Korea risking their lives, supposedly in defence of the very things which the Reds in Canada, with the co-operation of the CBC, were working to destroy. Combat Communism in Korea — but subsidize it at home!

The CBC televised the 1954 May Day parade and rally in Vancouver, addressed by such Red leaders as A. A. MacLeod (Ontario Red Leader) and Harvey Murphy of the West Coast. The Communist weekly, The Canadian Tribune (May 17.54) congratulated the CBC for carrying this propaganda at the taxpayers’ expense. Again, this is a case of taxing Canadians to arm against Communism, and at the same time taxing them to buy TV facilities for the Reds to spread their poison in Canada.

The same Commie weekly, in June of 1954, warmly praised the CBC for its Reuben Ship production; and in September of 1954 reported favourably on Canadian TV development as a government monopoly, beginning to carry educational programs into Canadian schools. 1 A letter published in the February 27, 1956, issue of this Red organ expresses pride in the CBC, referring to it as the “most democratic institution in Canada.”

CBC Communist Line Stepped Up

The fantastic success of this Red infiltration is evident from the glowing accounts of CBC programs recently carried in the Communist press.

Last October 1st, CBC carried the last of its Focus — series — a two-hour Commie play entitled We Shall Not Be Moved, which received two full columns of build-up in the September 25th CBC Times, and rapturous applause from the Red press.

The U.S. West Coast Communist organ, Daily People’s World (Oct. 13), reported:

“The Canadian Broadcasting Corp. made radio history Oct. 1 when it presented a two-hour special program, ‘We Shall Not Be Moved,’ in which Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, now jailed as a Smith Act victim, is portrayed as a leading figure.”

This CBC production featured a recording by Paul Robeson, the notorious Communist-front personality and money-raiser. The People’s World boasts that it “took over the best possible broadcasting time — 8 to 10 p.m. Saturday.

There were no interruptions — even the usual station breaks were omitted.”

The play glorified Elizabeth Gurley Flynn as a “rebel girl,” and People’s World, hardly able to conceal its mirth, suggested:

“Perhaps someone has made a recording of this program as was done with the play ‘The Investigator’ from the same network. It would be a smash hit.”

The Canadian Communist weekly, The Tribune (Oct. 17), carried this letter to Elizabeth Flynn:

“You were not in your cell Saturday evening, October 1st. You travelled across the Canadian border. You were in many Canadian homes. …”

And the same Communist organ (Oct. 10), under a 3-column headline “THREE CHEERS FOR THE CBC,” eulogizes it in these terms:

“For the excellence of this program all concerned must be congratulated. John Reeves, the producer, deserves special applause. He struck a new vein for Canadian radio to work, and it is a rich one.”

The truth of the matter, of course, is that Elizabeth Gurley Flynn is one of the leaders of the Communist conspiracy in the U.S., and is presently serving a prison term for her role in Red subversion in America.

The Communist propaganda line today is to paint Communists as persecuted champions of the working class, make the public believe that there really is no Communist menace, and defeat or emasculate anti-Communist security measures in order to spring their convicted agents from prison and open the way for further infiltration.

This CBC production, by glorifying the Red prisoner, and undermining security measures, followed every turn in the Communist line. Thus, as the U.S. cracks down on subversion, the CBC is used to beam the Red line to the U.S. and at the same time brainwash Canadians.

It is difficult to ujnderstand how such an incredible situation has developed in our CBC. This material is not merely slanted in favour of Communism — it IS Communism, pure and simple. The people responsible for staging such productions must be either outright Communists, or ‘egg-heads’ under the influence and control of those directing today’s Red line.

CBC Bias Widely Recognized

That the disturbing leftwing, anti-Christian influence I observe in the CBC is no figment of the imagination, is confirmed when we note but a few of the increasing protests.

“I am opposed to the godless vaporings of some top United Nations members of the medical profession heard over the government-owned radio system on a recent Sunday evening.”

Lions International, he said, was “a Godfearing, Christian organization, and we are not going to stand for some of this CBC broadcasting.”

The Canadian Slovak League, in a brief to the Ministers of External Affairs and National Defence in 1952, relating to CBC-Slovakia policy, said:

“The Slovaks are a conservative people with an absolute Catholic majority (about 85%), but the propaganda from Canada for Slovakia is performed by this Staff of Employees: Dr. Schmolka, Mr. Rejhon and his brother, Reichman, Stauber, and Williams, all of whom are of the Jewish religion … and of a deep socialistic conviction … and also three Czechs, Volesky, Skvor and Mrs. Vasak. We strongly doubt … that this is a good staff for the defence of these (Christian and national) ideals which today alone strengthen nations in their resistance.”

The leading Western Canada weekly, Camrose Canadian (July 22/53), commenting on a CBC report by Anne Francis in favour of recognition of Red China, described the talk as “pretty hot socialist propaganda.” And on Sept. 9/53, commenting on a series of CBC talks, observed: “An outsider could readily label each speaker as a Communist fellow traveller … and we Canadians are paying these men …”

The Ensign (July 31/54) said editorially:

“The ‘radio curtain’ can be noted also in Canada in the consistency of choice of political commentators on the nationally owned networks, who are most critical of Washington and most sympathetic to the recognition of Red China.

“It is interesting how a conspiracy of silence towards those advocating contrary views is a growing problem in many countries. …”

And on October 10/54 The Ensign observed:

“What the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation through a consistent choice of political commentators seems to be advocating is what Moscow desires.”

The Edmonton Journal, two years ago, observed editorially:

“Canadian listeners would like to have a balanced, objective account … Instead, all the commentators on this program, whether Canadians or Americans, give us virtually nothing except straight Democratic Party doctrine.”

Why The Strange Conformity ?

Why do the overwhelming majority of CBC commentators consistently follow the line promoted by the Communists, and consistently attack the most militant anti-Communist leaders and measures?

Is it because only individuals holding such pink views are selected consistently by the CBC ?

Or is it because reporters are anxious for these CBC contracts, and promote the line which they know, from experience, will assure them of more contracts?

It is respectfully submitted, gentlemen, that the CBC should be our most powerful weapon in the present ideological struggle, but that the evidence presented demonstrates that all too often it is actually used to further the Communist propaganda line.

It is hoped that the information contained in this brief, and the questions raised, will assist the Commission in finding and recommending action for the eliminating of Communist propaganda from our CBC.

– 30 –

______

1 Constitutionally, the federal government (and thus the CBC) is denied (local) Education powers. This was pointed out by Quebec historian, Robert Rumilly, also in 1956, the year of this Brief, in his L’Infiltration gauchiste au Canada français (The Leftist Infiltration in French Canada). Radio-Canada is the French name of the CBC in Quebec. From page 95:

Radio-Canada completes and has been supporting the leftist network set up in our province in the last few years.

It is unconstitutional already that the Federal state monopolizes a section of education –- a domain reserved to the provinces –- which it does by the interposition of Radio-Canada. The courts have recognized to the Federal state the right to regulate the use of the air­waves. They have not conceded to it any right of public education. Radio-Canada, the corporation, such as it functions, is illegal. It is doubly intolerable that French-language State radio and television, living off public funds of the French-Canadian people, seek to drag them towards an ideology contrary to their own traditions and their national aspirations.

However, the CBC today has done far more than to “merely” invade the “exclusive” provincial Education power. Major mega-movie-length series productions, edified by the CBC web site, have revised Canada’s history while offering course plans and “educational” packages to teachers Canada-wide. Thus, the CBC conscripts teachers to indoctrinate, meaning brainwash, Canadian children at the expense of their parents, the taxpayers, both federal and provincial.

But with what are they indoctrinating our children? Well, if you were the Soviet Union, having feigned collapse with intent to penetrate and merge with socialized and restructured western countries (as warned by KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn), imagine your advantage if the children of these countries could be made to grow up not merely believing their nation was on the brink of collapse, but literally expecting and accepting that it was going to happen. And that this feigned collapse of their own countries was the signal for the long-planned Communist restructuring to carry off the merger.

In Canada, our children are being brainwashed to view the Communist dismantling and restructuring of Canada as inevitable. This is not “education”.

This is what the CBC has accomplished for the benefit of world Communism and the advance of the underground Soviet Union, with its “history” segment on the “struggle” of the (Communist) Parti Québécois with (Communist) prime minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau, entitled: “A Fragile Unity”, produced by Canada’s man on the KGB payroll, Mark Starowicz.

Mark Starowicz’s Red demoralization of Canada: A Fragile Unity

The images above, top-down, are taken from [1] the 1968 organization by René Lévesque of the (Communist) Parti Québécois, implying, of course, the 1980 referendum conducted by him unlawfully as contrary to Confederation; [2] Pierre Elliott Trudeau of the “secret committee” of Power Corporation which appointed Lévesque to set up the PQ; and [3] the 1982 false “patriation” which overthrew the lawful Parliament and Legislatures of Canada using the Sovereign as the front to pull it off. The title of the episode, “A Fragile Unity”, however, impliedly refers to the 1995 referendum, also unlawful, also under the PQ, and which most likely was rigged, but failed nonetheless thanks to a last-minute Canada Rally organized by a local businessman.

The “patriation” image implies what those behind the scenes know; had the 1980 referendum pulled off a “Yes”, United Kingdom, under the pretense of constitutional “amendment” of the British North America Acts (1867 et seq), was to pass a “law” “patriating” a new constitution disassembling Canada into a string of “associated” proto-Communist banana republics.

CBC producer Mark Starowicz promised a KGB agent he would act on behalf of Soviet interests

In 1975, Progressive-Conservative Member of the Canadian Parliament, Tom Cossitt (for Leeds) tried repeatedly to open an inquiry into the KGB’s Konstantin Geyvandov, a Pravda correspondent, and money received from him and promises made to him by CBC producer, Mark Starowicz:

According to just one of his interventions in federal Hansard, on the 12th of June 1975, the Hon. Thomas Charles Cossitt said in the House:

Mr. Speaker. I rise under the provisions of Standing Order 43 to ask leave to move, seconded by the hon. member for Dauphin (Mr. Ritchie), the following motion:

The truly Honorable Mr. Tom Cossitt,a Canadian hero.

That a special committee of this House be set up forthwith to investigate all activities of Soviet journalist Konstantin Geivandov while he was in Canada, that the committee be charged with examining all connections with this matter on the part of Mark Starowicz, executive producer of the CBC program “As It Happens”, that the committee be given power to summon any persons whatsoever as witnesses that it deems advisable, that files on the matter including those of the Departments of Manpower and Immigration, External Affairs and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police showing the activities of Geivandov, Starowicz, and others, be produced to the committee and, finally, that such files, pending examination by the committee, be forthwith placed in the safe custody of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada to guarantee their safety from destruction for political or any other purposes whatsoever.

In 1979, the irrepressible Mr. Cossitt is continuing his effort to launch a formal investigation:

Mr. Tom Cossitt (Leeds):

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a matter of urgent necessity as a result of a statement made by the Prime Minister (Mr. Clark) this morning at his press conference, that there was concern within the CBC regarding an individual who allegedly assisted a KGB representative in Canada, and I might add that this individual had been previously identified in the Ontario legislature by the attorney general of Ontario as CBC producer Mark Starowicz. I move, seconded by the hon. member for York North (Mr. Gamble):

Whereas CBC producer Mark Starowicz assisted KGB agent Konstantine Geyvandov in compiling information on certain persons, allegedly on six different occasions, and also promised “to act on behalf of Soviet interests“, that the CBC be required to give a public explanation as to why Mark Starowicz continues as producer of the public opinion influencing program “Sunday Morning” and, finally, as to why he is being considered at this very moment to head all CBC national news and public affairs programming.

In 1983, on Friday, March the 4th, another Progressive-Conservative Member, the Hon. Elmer MacIntosh MacKay (for Central Nova) picks up where Mr. Cossitt left off (I have not cited all of Mr. Cossitt’s interventions). Mr. McKay will quote newspaperman Peter Worthington quoting the RCMP.

Madam Speaker, some years ago the then Member for Leeds [Mr. Cossitt] noted for the first time in this House the name of CBC producer Mark Starowicz in connection with the expelled KGB agent, Konstantin Geyvandov, who masqueraded in Ottawa as a Soviet journalist. Two years later the Attorney General of Ontario quoted in the Legislature an RCMP document according to which a Canadian media person over a period of five years was selling Geyvandov reports at clandestine meetings. Next day CBC producer Mark Starowicz identified himself as the person who, between 1970 and 1973, had accepted money for reports written for a Soviet correspondent in Ottawa.

The RCMP report says Pravda’s man in Ottawa, Geyvandov, was expelled from Canada after persuading a Canadian journalist to act on behalf of Soviet interests when reporting Canadian political events. …

I am strongly inclined to believe that the Canadian media person in the McMurtry statement and the Canadian journalist in the report referred to by Mr. Worthington are the same person. I wrote about it to the Solicitor General (Mr. Kaplan). He is reluctant to reveal the man’s identity. In the meantime, CBC keeps on its payroll a senior executive who, by his own admission, was also on the payroll of a Soviet official and who, I strongly suspect, is the same person identified by the RCMP as acting on behalf of Soviet interests.

I do not believe at this stage that the Liberal Government with its track record –

Two sad ironies: there has been a Southern-Rhodesian-style coup on Parliament under Trudeau in 1982. Canada, long occupied, has been dealt a pounding blow. Men (quoted below) who would be legitimate Members of the House are apparently not aware, although the coup was admitted by one of its perpetrators in 1982, Barry Lee Strayer, in his pair of Cronkite Lectures to a university law faculty.

The other sad irony: Mr. McKay is not among friends in the House. The “Madam Speaker” to whom he has addressed his plea is Jeanne Benoit Sauvé, future Governor General of Canada (representing the post-coup Queen) and the wife of ex-Forestry Minister Maurice Sauvé under Soviet agent prime minister Lester Pearson.

In fact, both Jeanne and Maurice Sauvé were involved in a Communist front put in place in the 1950s by Soviet-infested British Secret Intelligence (MI6) and the Communist-staffed CIA, at the prompting of British Fabian socialist Sir Stafford Cripps. The World Association of Youth (WAY), with Member of Parliament Maurice Sauvé as its first president, and his wife at his side, organized youth to help federalize Europe (destroy the nation-state). In Canada, after 9/11, a similar group emerged under the wing of Sauvé’s Communist PQ: the North American Forum on Integration (NAFI), devoted, like WAY, to subverting our youth to restructure the continent for a federalized North American Union on the EU model.

We can see that for nearly a decade, decent men tried to expose Soviet tool, Mr. Mark Starowicz. However, I am of the view that the above-said Mr. McMurtry is not to be classed among them; the grounds will appear.

In Ontario Hansard of December 9th, 1977, provincial justice minister, the Hon. Mr. Roy McMurtry, while withholding the name of Mr. Starowicz, had nonetheless to admit:

“… the RCMP concern with individuals in the Waffle was increased when it was found that a Canadian news media person, closely associated with leading people in the Waffle, was meeting clandestinely with Konstantin Geyvandov, a Russian KGB intelligence officer who, between August 1968 and September 1973, operated in Canada as a Pravda correspondent.”

McMurtry continued:

“The RCMP investigation confirmed that this Canadian provided reports to Geyvandov during these clandestine meetings and on at least six occasionswas paid moneyby Geyvandov. Amongst other things, the Canadian was specifically asked by Geyvandov to provide reports to him on the NDP and the Waffle.

“… The RCMP believed that Geyvandov’s purpose in seeking such reports was to assist the Russian KGB intelligence service in deciding whether the Waffle group or any of its members were worthy of further attention by the KGB.”

The Hon. Mr. Gaunt interjects:

“Now a pipeline right to the Kremlin.”

Ontario justice minister Roy McMurtry in the Ontario Legislature on the 9th of December 1977, failed to name Mark Starowicz, though he had to know his name. McMurtry seems to me to protect Starowicz when he refers to him simply as “a Canadian news media person”. McMurtry names the Soviet agent, but not Mark Starowicz, who has been on the KGB’s payroll.

Then, in 1981, McMurtry shows up in the media during the (false) “patriation” as one of three men in the photo at the time of the so-called “Kitchen Accord”. The “Kitchen Accord”, incorrectly described as an agreement to patriate the Constitution (in the propaganda which serves as “news” in Canada), was in fact a “federal-provincial” agreement to overthrow the Parliament and Legislatures for a new form of non-sovereign government. It was nothing less than a Southern Rhodesian-style coup d’état, a leftist coup on Canada. However, it was not challenged, at the UN or elsewhere, and I believe that is because Mrs. Windsor leant herself as the front, visiting Canada personally to “proclaim” it as a constitutional amendment, which it was not.

And here is Roy McMurtry in the middle of it, in the guise of a “justice minister”, lending his title, his name and his face to it.

This suggests to me that McMurtry is a left sympathizer; that he deliberately protected Starowicz by withholding his name from the Ontario Members. (In fact, I haven’t got any earlier Ontario Hansard than the one I’ve quoted, and which is posted online. It is always possible that McMurtry mentioned Starowicz on another occasion, but to date I have nothing to suggest that he did.)

Now, McMurtry’s payoff for the “Kitchen Accord”: a distinguished career under the 1982 coup d’état constitution, culminating in his appointment as Chief Justice of Ontario, the courts now, of course, imposing the illegal Charter. At his law firm’s web site (Hull & Hull LLP, 2016), the now-retired McMurtry

“was deeply involved in the patriation of the Canadian Constitution and the creation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. During that period, he also served four years as the Solicitor General for Ontario.”

The law firm also says:

“In February 1996, he [McMurtry] was appointed Chief Justice of Ontario, a capacity in which he served for over 11 years until May 30, 2007.”

That places Mr. McMurtry in the Ontario provincial driver’s seat during the artificial “law suit”, Lalonde v. Ontario1, concocted out of the wholly staged, “SOS Montfort” protest, for the sole purpose of rubber-stamping with a non-appealed concocted “judgment” of an Ontario court of record, the so-called “unwritten principles” of the 1998 “secession” opinion of the Supreme Court of Canada’s non-judicial advisory board, to make them look like “law”. The “principles” then form the basis of the federal Clarity Act, a counterfeit “statute” intended to force Canada to dismantle itself, while authorizing the international community to “recognize” a string of UDIs. And thus will end Canada’s so-called “fragile unity” (according to former executive producer at the CBC, Mark Starowicz).

In Conclusion

The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) is the ultimate, entirely subversive tool of political control exerted over the educational and communications systems of a target country by a hostile foreign power. Sun Tzu would be awe-struck.

This article, “Did Radicals Aim To Overthrow Government?”, in the The Winnipeg Free Press of 27 January 1977, is careful to exclude most names of individuals and of the “radical” organization subject of Solicitor-General Jean-Pierre Goyer’s “letter” “warning” government departments of subversive activities. However, the reference to a $68,000 federal-government grant to the “radical group” by Central Mortgage and Housing Corporation, identifies the unnamed radical organization working to overthrow the government of Canada as Praxis Corporation, also then known as the “Research Institute for Social Change”.

One name the WFP does reveal is that of Walter Rudnicki, described by the WFP as “policy planning director of Central Mortgage and Housing Corp”. That raises my question, was Rudnicki responsible for the CMHC award to Praxis of the $68,000, its main operating budget?

The question is important because just prior to Rudnicki’s employment with the CMHC, he was an official in the Privy Council Office of Canada which conducts research to advise the Prime Minister.

Rudnicki’s official biography (a short one, to cover his personal and professional archives on file with the Archives, University of Manitoba in Winnipeg), describes his positions with the PCO and then the CMHC this way:

“Rudnicki also worked within government as Secretary of the Social Policy Committee, in the Privy Council Office (PCO), and as a senior policy advisor for Cabinet Minister Robert Andras (1968-1970). In 1969 he left the PCO and became the Executive Director of the Central Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) and advised the Minister on housing and urban development.”

Rudnicki will figure in an upcoming post on the Edmund Burke Society, founded in 1967 by three men, including University of Toronto student, F. Paul Fromm as an “anticommunist” group. Information that I currently have indicates that Walter Rudnicki exposed the Edmund Burke Society as a national police operation (a front) of the federal government of Canada. Therefore, this initial post will help to connect Rudnicki himself to the Trudeau federal government.

In this article in the 1977 Winnipeg Free Press, Jean-Pierre Goyer, Solicitor General in 1971, identifies Rudnicki as one of 21 “subversives” linked to the Communist Praxis Corporation, working to overthrow the government of Canada. Somehow, Rudnicki cleared himself, and returned to work for the federal government and its agencies.

Meanwhile, why did Solicitor-General Jean-Pierre Goyer decide to blow the whistle, naming some twenty-one individuals as likely “radicals” (subversives) involved in a plot at Praxis to overthrow the government of Canada? The question is important, because, as American anticommunist Alan Stang reveals in the April 1971 issue of American Opinion, Jean-Pierre Goyer himself was a communist. Said Stang:

Another thing you need if you are imposing a dictatorship is control of the police. In Canada, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police are controlled by the Solicitor-General. So Trudeau made Jean-Pierre Goyer the Solicitor-General — when Parliament was not in session and could not question him. Goyer, it goes without saying, was a regular contributor to Cité Libre. Isn’t everybody? He was once arrested for staging a sit-in outside the office of the Premier of Quebec. He has been involved in several pro-Communist fronts. And he has attended Communist meetings behind the Iron Curtain. Like his friend Trudeau, he is a revolutionary.

This is the man now running the national police of Canada.

In the same long article, in a section headed “The Poor War Revolution”, Stang also talks about Praxis. He says, “Praxis is what the Communists call an “agit-prop” outfit (agitation and propaganda), egging people on to Marxist revolution.”

The Poor People’s Conference run by Praxis had been financed by the federal government of Pierre Elliott Trudeau through funds contributed by Trudeau’s Minister of Health and Welfare John Munro, through such federal agencies as the National Council of Welfare.

Stang quotes from a speech by Alex Bandy to the Poor People’s Conference run by Jerry [Ferry] Hunnius via Praxis:

“… The way Munro tells it, the government is really, secretly, on our side. It’s everybody else who is against us and that’s why the government can’t help us. So, the master plan is to give us money to organize and demonstrate and win popular support, then the government will move ….” [Emphases added.]

Obviously, the de facto federal government of Pierre Elliott Trudeau was not at all hostile to Praxis Corporation.

Stang describes the kind of “social change” that Praxis “radicals” were working for:

… in March, 1970, Praxis had run another conference, on “industrial democracy,” at which Gerry Hunnius, who runs Praxis, said workers should “control the means and processes of production.” What that means, said Hunnius, is this: “It should be obvious that a fully operational system of workers’ self-management cannot operate within a Capitalist system …. ”

In October, 1970, Praxis had run still another Conference — this one on “Workers’ Control and Community Control” — at which a demand was made to destroy Capitalism by revolution. Capitalism would be replaced by “radical Socialism.” Confrontation is obsolete, the conferees were told. What they should do now is “infiltrate,” and, like “microbes,” destroy Canada from within.”

Furthermore, Stang links Hunnius to Pierre Elliott Trudeau:

It is interesting to note that in 1962, Gerry Hunnius, who runs Praxis, which ran the Conference Pierre paid for, was in Moscow at the World Congress for General Disarmament and Peace, sponsored by the Communist World Peace Council – which had sponsored Trudeau’s trip to Moscow ten years before. In 1963, Hunnius went to work as European representative of the Canadian Peace Research Institute, which the Canada Council supports with public funds — and two directors of which, at one time, were Trudeau and Pelletier. Another director, named in 1962, was Communist Jean-Louis Gagnon. [Emphases added.]

Which brings us full-circle to our equally Communist Solicitor-General, and back to my question, why would Jean-Pierre Goyer (appointed by Trudeau “when Parliament was not in session and could not question him” said Stang) “blow the whistle” on the radicals at Praxis? Goyer himself, like Pierre Elliott Trudeau and Jean-Louis Gagnon are penetrated Communists working “like microbes” to “destroy Canada” … for the Yugoslav system of Communist “worker control” or “industrial democracy”.

According to my original research, the Trudeau objective is excactly the Praxis objective: Yugoslav-style Communist “Worker Control”, aka “industrial democracy” of the kind practiced under Marshall Tito. That information comes from a reading of the 1972 manifesto of the Parti Québécois for a Communist state of Quebec — which I have translated into English — together with a 1972 Radio-Canada transcript and audio tape — which I have also translated into English — in which the manifesto is identified as calling for Yugoslav-style Communism for Quebec.

For a free download of the 1972 manifesto and the radio show in one zip file, see the Download button on the top menu.

Furthermore, the Parti Québécois was set up by Lévesque (1967-1968) on orders of Trudeau and other embedded Reds under Soviet Agent Lester Bowles Pearson. That news emerges from a 1967 dispatch of American CIA agent Edward C. Bittner, then stationed in Ottawa; confirmed by Jean-François Lisée (a main PQ strategist and prolific author of state-funded political pot-boilers) in circa 1990 by interviews with parties mentioned in the dispatch. the Bittner dispatch, said Lisée, revealed the existence of a “secret committee” of “Liberals” most being cabinet ministers from Quebec in the Lester Pearson federal government. On the committee were Pierre Elliott Trudeau, Jean Marchand, Maurice Sauvé and others [translation]:

“the Committee encouraged René Lévesque and his sympathisers within and outside the Liberal Party of Québec to set up a distinct party, which would be soundly defeated in an electoral showdown.” [Emphasis added.]

“Electoral” meaning “referendum”. And thus we have the true source of our Quebec “independence” or “sovereignty” referendums.

Obviously, the “radicals'” plan to penetrate and destroy Canada “like microbes” had long been well under way at the federal level. Lester Bowles Pearson was in fact a Soviet agent, exposed in the U.S. McCarran hearings and to the FBI by defecting GRU Elizabeth Bentley (formerly with Soviet military intelligence).

Jean-François Lisée — a known Communist — is now the elected leader of the Communist PQ [7 October 2016], succeeding multimillionaire Pauline Marois, Lucien Bouchard, Bernard Landry, Jacques Parizeau and René Lévesque in their goal of making the province of Quebec into a Communist banana republic attached to the “rest of Canada” and to the “USA” by “trade agreements”.

I have read that the Canada Council was actually funded or majority funded from the outset by David Rockefeller (whose Chase Manhattan bank co-funded the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution), but I haven’t got the footnote handy right now. However, and cautiously, a few words on Praxis from the Lyndon Larouche group. “Former” Marxist Lyndon Larouche’s Executive Intelligence Review (EIR) of July 12, 1977, Vol. IV, No. 28 (ISSN 0146-9614), referring to EIR’s own research (“Praxis: The Institute for Policy Studies’ Canadian Extension”), has alleged:

A preliminary investigation of the actual nature of the Praxis Corp. network reveals it to be the centerpiece in a broad-based, largely Rockefeller-inspired, conspiracy directed at all phases of the Canadian policy making process. Information on Praxis and associated networks gathered in Canada and gridded against the extensively documented activities of the terrorist controllers at the U.S.-based Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) both in North America and in Europe show the Praxis Corp. to be an IPS-Canadian front organization.

The EIR concludes:

This iden­tification, matched in turn against known official Rockefeller policy options for Canada, allows the ef­ficient assemblage of the complete profile of Rockefeller and allied network agencies of subversion directed at Canadian national sovereignty.

He and his former successor as leader of the CAP, well known Communist Connie Fogal-Rankin, would like the Canadian parliament to have a “democratic mandate” from the Canadian people for the North American Union. (The BNA Act of 1867 prohibits North American Union, so these cons have introduced the forbidden as an “option”.)

However, the deeper truth behind the Canadian Action Party is truly bizarre. 2 And there is no way to spoof it for you to celebrate Christmas-New Year’s 2016-2017, other than to expose the truth.

Hellyer’s interviewer, Sophie Shevardnadze, evidently perplexed, can only reply, “Uhum” to the news that a flying saucer had hovered over Bethlehem to announce the birth of Jesus.

But that mythic scenario fits precisely into the intergalactic-theocratic-Urantia cult behind Paul Hellyer’s Canadian Action Party.

Paul Hellyer: “I think the Star of Bethlehem was one of God’s flying saucers.”

When Hellyer says, “one of God’s flying saucers”, he is referring to the Book of Urantia peddled by Canadian Action Party president Paul Kemp.

In its internal, non-public culture, Hellyer’s Canadian Action Party supports a one-world government, a globalist religion (Urantia), alien-human hybridization, and membership of the Earth (real name, Urantia) in an interplanetary federation. The scam is that Earth must have world government in order to be admitted to the federation.

Add to this an intergalactic Jesus incarnated throughout the infinite alien-populated worlds advanced as “fact” and “truth” in Paul Kemp’s presentation of the Urantia Book, and you start to see why Hellyer would announce: “the Star of Bethlehem was one of God’s flying saucers.”

The Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Bilderberg Group are presumed by Urantia “believers” at CAP to have received “alien contact”. This is why these sainted organizations, run by the world’s worst Evilarchy, are motivated to form a one-world government: so that Earth can join “galactic society”.

One such believer is Paul Kemp’s friend, retired U.S. Air Force Lt.-Col Don Ware, who admits to channeling telepathic aliens. Ware is said to have claimed:

“In 1989, after studying and learning more about the non-physical aspects of the universe, I was used by a higher intelligence to send a message to the generals at Eglin Air Force Base.”

Also, says Ware:

“I accept the idea that intelligent life is abundant throughout the universe, in both incarnate and discarnate forms”

“the normal means of communication by higher intelligence is telepathic”

“Millions of Americans are participating in a hybridization program with short beings from Zeta Reticula.”

“The main reason alien liaison is increasing now is because our planet is being transformed to support a new world order.”

Notice anything familiar yet?

Ware continues:

“The new order is destined to support a learning process that is one step beyond the human experience of free-will choices.”

A world Marxist dictatorship is “one step beyond” “free-will choices”. Coincidence? Give up your free will for the greater good of the intergalactic collective! Just what we need! Space aliens who are Marxists! Perhaps Karl channeled the Manifesto from telepathic Zeta Reticulans?

“… the new world order can become what Jesus described as heaven on Earth.”

The Warburg-financed Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, viewed by many as the founding father of the European Union (first chunk of the world-government system laid in place) said in his 1925 book, Practical Idealism:

Through the ages Jewry has remained faithful to the theocratic idea of the identification of politics and ethics: Christianity and Socialism are both attempts to create an earthly paradise. [lit.: a State of God] Now, the Kemp web sites prominently feature the Star of David and the flag of Israel in the Urantia scheme for an intergalactic federation of world-governments.

Don Ware continues:

“I think the Bilderburgers [sic], the Trilateral Commission, and the Council on Foreign Relations in America is influenced by alien liaison.”

“I think many members of these groups recognize that having a government that can speak for all of the people of the world is a prerequisite to joining a galactic society.”

“Economies are coalescing into three major economic blocks, and advanced communication and transportation systems are allowing a great inter-mingling of societies.”

The Urantia cult is a spinoff from the 7th-Day Adventists who themselves spun off David Koresh’s Messianic Branch Davidians. The Branch Davidians met their tragic end in a bloody FBI siege in 1993 at Waco, Texas. (It is alleged that Hillary Rodham Clinton ordered the massacre.)

Waco (wacko?) is also the home of the alleged Bush-Fox-Martin signature in 2005 of a non-released document behind the “Security and Prosperity Partnership” of North America, to complete a regional union (“regionalism is Communism”, says Charlotte Iserbyt of NewsWithViews) on the pretext of 9/11.

The “Urantia Book” behind the cult is a faked “religious” document “channeled” by a member of the Kellogg family. The same family produced at least four members of the ominous “Skull & Bones” secret society.

The object of the Urantia cult is world government for the Earth (Urantia), where the Earth is just one among an infinite number of planets in an interstellar federation of planets, each with its own world government. The aliens inhabiting these “worlds of space” are all portrayed as “higher intelligences”, “advanced beings” whom we Urantians ought to emulate.

At the center of the whole federation is God on the middle planet. Which explains the reference of Paul Hellyer in the news clip to “one of God’s flying saucers”. This is pure Urantia Book. (And no, we don’t know yet if God is David Rockefeller.)

So the purpose for pretending to “channel” a 2000-page book to kick-start a new religion might well be sinister.

And, sinister it is when you discover the passages in the Urantia Book (the cult’s “Bible”) demanding a one-world government.

Now, world government is what the Canadian Action Party claims to oppose when addressing the public. But, one-world government is a religious tenet of the UFO cult manically pursued behind the scenes by Canadian Action Party founder Paul Hellyer and his conspiratorial Executive members.

The Canadian Action Party’s president, Paul Kemp, literally preaches Urantia on and off-line (see his Facebook page and his collection of “other worlds of space” web sites linked below). According to Kemp, the Urantia Book says:

134:6.4 Another world war will teach the so-called sovereign nations to form some sort of federation, thus creating the machinery for preventing small wars, wars between the lesser nations.

The malign intelligence behind the words “will teach” in that passage is too startling to be ignored. In the past few years, self-styled analyst Joel M. Skousen, nephew of W. Cleon Skousen who published The Naked Communist and The Naked Capitalist, has been warning that “they are planning a war for us”.

Says Skousen to Alex Jones, in the advertising film for his book Strategic Relocation (drumming up business for Skousen’s profession installing hi-tech nuclear bomb shelters for the mobile rich):

“Well, part of it is that they don’t understand the nature of the conspiracy. They don’t understand that there is a great powerful force not only to take down Liberty, which is what their agenda is, but to make sure that they don’t get the blame for it.

So, they are going to use — they blame it on anyone, they blame it on the free market, they blame it on “business cycle”. It’s not the business cycle, it’s the monetary cycle created by the Fed.

And ultimately, these people are going to escape blame, because they are planning a war for us. A third world-war. A nuclear war. Which in fact will wipe out a great deal of the financial centers and will let them to walk away and say, ‘It wasn’t our fault’.”

“The Fed” is the U.S. Federal Reserve bank, which is not a national bank but a private bank. The Federal Reserve is composed of all the same banking interests behind the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) which for over a century has engineered all the major wars, including World Wars I and II, financing both sides.

The goal of this Bankers’ protection racket was to push the free nations of the world to the bargaining table, there to create a world government. With the creation of the United Nations Organization in 1945, stage one has been accomplished. The table has been laid. Stage two is underway, and Hellyer and Company are playing “the alien card“.

We therefore have currently playing out before us, an apparently Marxist, Bankster-friendly Urantia UFO cult, hybridized with Christianity and with Zionist forces. For Paul Kemp’s Urantia web sites all use the Star of David and the flags of Israel and the United Nations as twin pennons of the desired World Order over Earth in an interplanetary federation.

All are pushing naive people to accept, on religious faith, the spirituality and “goodness” of David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission, his Marxist Council on Foreign Relations, and his pro-Communist Bilderbergers.

Enameled onto this religious tenet is the requirement that Urantia believers agree that national sovereignty is poisonous, and the cause of wars.

National sovereignty is not the cause of wars; the Bankers are the cause of wars. Wars could not be fought without financing. It is well known that the Rothschild bankers have financed both sides in most European wars for hundreds of years. They financed both sides in the last Napoleonic War, and capitalized on their advance knowledge of Napoleon’s defeat, to trick the British markets into a panic so the Rothschilds could buy up stock at rock-bottom prices. As a consequence, it is hotly rumored, the Rothschilds thus acquired control of the Bank of England.

Another passage from the Urantia Book, as posted by the CAP’s Paul Kemp, gives a very strong hint as to who is really behind this phony religion and UFO cult:

134:6.11 Under global government the national groups will be afforded a real opportunity to realize and enjoy the personal liberties of genuine democracy. The fallacy of self-determination will be ended. With global regulation of money and trade will come the new era of world-wide peace. Soon may a global language evolve, and there will be at least some hope of sometime having a global religion — or religions with a global viewpoint.

“Why will you not understand the psychology that is so important in the national question and which, if the slightest coercion is applied, besmirches, soils, nullifies the undoubtedly progressive importance of centralisation, large states and a uniform language?”

Lenin continues, linking his view of how a global language must “evolve” spurred by the development of a “capitalist” economy:

“But the economy is still more important than psychology: in Russia we already have a capitalist economy, which makes the Russian language essential. But you have no faith in the power of the economy and want to prop it up with the crutches of the rotten police regime.”

Apparently, Paul Hellyer and the Canadian Action Party are propping up Marxist world government on the crutches of a phony UFO cult.

On the topic of “democracy”, Lenin had this to say in his September 7th, 1913 article in Pravda (page 357, Vol. 19, Collected Works), although when Lenin says “alien” he probably doesn’t have in mind the inducement to world government promoted by Hellyer.

“Working-class democracy counterposes to the nationalist wrangling of the various bourgeois parties over questions of language, etc., the demand for the unconditional unity and complete solidarity of workers of all nationalities in all working-class organisations — trade union, co-operative, consumers’, educational and all others — in contradistinction to any kind of bourgeois nationalism. Only this type of unity and solidarity can uphold democracy and defend the interests of the workers against capital — which is already international and is becoming more so — and promote the development of mankind towards a new way of life that is alien to all privileges and all exploitation.”

But what of the Canadian Action Party’s “global religion”! Have the Marxists conceded the value of blending the behavioral goals of their materialist religion with the enforcement function of religion over “primitive instincts” to free choice and self-determination?

Perhaps Maurice Strong will emerge with a more complex version of Urantia, itself, linked to phony man-made “climate change”?

Urantia is pretty deadly stuff; and it’s targeted to securing compliance with a Bankster-engineered overthrow of Western Civilization by a naive element of that same population.

Basically, when the views that the Evilarchy wants people to hold become tenets held on faith; they are no longer open to challenge in the real world outside that hypnotically wobbling orb of the imaginary universe created by Urantia around its advocates.

The Urantia cult as promoted by Heller converts the Banksters and their Marxist Council on Foreign Relations, their Trilateral Commission and extended networks into collaborators of Christ to create a world government “paradise” on Earth, as part of an intergalactic federation where it is possible to voyage to the middle planet and meet God; (or perhaps David Rockefeller).

Bloggers including Tim Boucher have questioned whether Hellyer has lost his mind. Indeed, I believe there is calculated method to Hellyer’s apparent madness. His “far out” Urantia cult enables a real political power grab advanced through mind control exerted over a fringe element with limited capacities for critical judgment.

As for me, I’m betting that “God” will turn out to be a trans-humanized, brain-transplanted Evelyn de Rothschild, ensconced upon the Divine Hijacked British Throne at the center of Kemp’s wacky Universe.

I hope the galactic truth about Paul Hellyer and the Canadian Action Party has set you free!

1 In 2003, Paul Hellyer tried to merge the Canadian Action Party with the New Democratic Party of Canada (NDP). The NDP has always been a full member of the Socialist International (SI), whose platform is world government (Oslo Declaration, 1962). The fact that Hellyer tried to merge the CAP with the NDP proves that Hellyer is in favor of world government.

“The ultimate objective of the parties of the Socialist International is nothing less than world government. As a first step towards it, they seek to strengthen the United Nations so that it may become more and more effective as an instrument for maintaining peace.”

2 Back around 2009, a concerned member of the Canadian Action Party who was inside and able to observe the “pro” world government activity of the CAP and its Urantia UFO cult, began to leak documents on these hypocrites who were pretending to save Canada’s “sovereignty”.

Who Killed Kennedy?And Who Killed Kennedy’s Killer’s Look-Alike?

Lineup: Bachand? Oswald?

Can you pick Oswald out of this line-up?Can you pick François Mario Bachand out of this lineup?

Fidel Castro & the assassinationof John Fitzgerald Kennedy

Fidel Castro founded the Quebec terrorist movement, the FLQ, which he began to set up with Belgian immigrant to Montreal (and possibly KGB agent) Georges Schoeters, during a meeting between them in Montreal in early 1959. FLQ is short for Front de Libération du Québec (Quebec Liberation Front).

Castro’s 1959 visit to Montreal was organized by a Quebec criminal lawyer, Robert Daoust, whose primary client is later known to be the Cotroni mob. Whether Daoust worked for Cotroni at the time he brought in Castro is unconfirmed. However, it would be interesting to know, since the Cotronis had a special interest in the Liberal Party of Canada. And it was the Liberals under Soviet agent Pearson, who used the existence of the FLQ and its 1960s bombing spree as a pretext in 1967 to order the set-up of the Parti Québécois (PQ). These referendums benefit the Communist-controlled federal level of Canada, which can then appear to “save” Canada from Quebec “separatism” by negotiating the restructuring of all of Canada for Communism.

An American woman (Andrea Silverthorne) has a theory that an Oswald look-alike shot Kennedy because Oswald was not a marksman. This is her solution to the “French connection” alleged in the Kennedy assassination. Silverthorne suggests that Oswald double, François Mario Bachand, was a marksman. He moreover hung out with actual FLQ terrorists, Silverthorne observes, which made him seem to be one of them … and might have been a cover for him.

Bachand was bailed out of jail by a newspaper reporter a couple of weeks before President John F. Kennedy was shot. On release from jail, the Oswald look-alike promptly went underground.

Silverthorne identifies the French Canadian François Mario Bachand as possibly having shown up on-site in Texas for the shooting (grassy knoll), accompanied by his wife and small child.

Years later, in 1971, Bachand himself was assassinated execution-style, in Paris. The execution occurred shortly after Soviet agent, Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau, ordered it; which is a criminal act: government is not entitled to murder a citizen in cold blood. (Tell it to Barack Hussein Obama, who assumes a “presidential power” to exterminate American citizens, and other innocent bystanders).

“when Parliament was not in session and could not question him. … Goyer … has been involved in several pro-Communist fronts. And he has attended Communist meetings behind the Iron Curtain. Like his friend Trudeau, he is a revolutionary.”

It was alleged that Trudeau himself was to be a target of assassination on Bachand’s imminent return to Quebec. Thus, the notion of a capability or intent for assassination was clearly associated with this Oswald look-alike.

[Translation:] “[w]ithin the F.L.Q., the major Spring event is the assassination in Paris, on March 29th [1971], of François Mario [400] Bachand, one of the leaders-in-exile of the movement. Bachand, aged 27, is found dead in his flat in Saint-Ouen in a working-class suburb of Paris, felled by two bullets from a 22-caliber revolver shot into the back of the neck at close range. The matter has never been officially clarified. Mario Bachand, who lived in semi-clandestinity, was getting ready to return to Quebec; he had taken steps in that direction with Maître Bernard Mergler. He wanted to regularize his situation after having fled to Cuba in April 1969, while he was out on bail on altogether minor charges connected to “Operation McGill français” (the other accused had been cleared). Still a partisan of the F.L.Q., he was nonetheless in disagreement with some of his comrades, due notably to his tactical support for the P.Q.

[…]

In a secret text written shortly before his death, Bachand would advocate that Québécois militants “move to total clandestinity” because the repression had become too strong. “What is needed,” he said, “is to form selected armed groups, which will attack certain objectives at very precise moments. In addition, it is necessary that a certain form of urban guerilla be maintained, for example bombs in anglophone neighborhoods, hold-ups, well timed executions of certain politically dangerous persons such as Jean Drapeau and Pierre Trudeau“, because the execution of Pierre Laporte constituted a “positive” gesture.

Trudeau’s execution order allegedly arose from concern that Bachand might be able to achieve his aim. However, there is another reason clear from the same extract from Fournier why Trudeau would not have wanted Bachand to return to Quebec. The “secret committee at Power” had ordered the set-up of the Parti Québécois to run referendums in Quebec as the “democratic” alternative to FLQ violence. With the PQ holding seven seats in the Quebec Legislature in 1970, and hopes on the rise for an early referendum, the last thing Trudeau and his Reds now want is the return to Canada of Bachand. This highly competent friend of the FLQ and organizer of leftist riots, including the perceived Communist Front of “Opération McGill français” in 1969, might have stirred up violence; and made the PQ’s “democratic option” defunct before it became fully operational.

Trudeau’s execution order targeting Bachand may have had more to do with keeping the PQ in power to facilitate his own planned negotiations with his Communist friend, Lévesque to restructure Canada. This obviously was the aim at that time, and still is: there is no other purpose to the Communist PQ. Had Bachand stirred up social unrest and violence, the PQ would have come to an untimely end as a credible “political” alternative to the FLQ approach for taking Quebec out of Canada.

Thus, Bachand’s alleged intent to assassinate Trudeau might well have been a facade for the real objective: protecting the Communist and terrorist-filled ranks of the Liberals’ “political solution,” the PQ, from disintegration.

Bachand: the Kennedy “French Connection”?

Silverthorne has written up her theory that Bachand was the famed “French connection”, with astonishing pictures of BACHAND and OSWALD (above) at her web site, named for President John F. Kennedy’s proposed site of America’s first tidal power dam for cheap and plentiful energy: the Passamaquoddy. Her story is here:

Adding my own speculation to the Silverthorne scenario: if Fidel Castro ordered the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, he may have used François Mario Bachand — masked as an “FLQ” terrorist — to do (some of) the shooting, and Castro’s lifelong best friend Trudeau may have then closed the JFK file by having Bachand executed.

Bachand’s name comes up on the FLQ timeline at Wikipedia, which places Bachand in Cuba on several occasions in the years after the Kennedy shooting:

March 24, Solicitor General Jean-Pierre Goyer, Director General of the RCMP Security Service John Starnes and Deputy Solicitor General Ernest Côté meet. Goyer orders Starnes to “neutralize” Mario Bachand [murder, assassinate, kill a Canadian citizen extra-judicially], in Paris, an operation that had been planned since February. A heated exchange ensues; “Starnes objected that it would be pointless and hazardous and that the service was incapable of it.” Goyer says he would consult with the Prime Minister.[22]

Note the latter half of that title, “the death of the FLQ”. As I theorize above, organizer Bachand may have been ordered killed to keep the PQ in power, by obstructing the return of the FLQ.

Indeed, journalist Louis Fournier notes:

[Translation:] “[…] the death of François Mario Bachand coincided with an unprecedented offensive of the information and security services against any attempt to relaunch the F.L.Q.“

Fournier also declares:

[Translation:] Two major theories may explain the death of Francois Bachand: either he was “executed” by a commando of former comrades in disagreement with him, as a settling of accounts which would be absolutely unique in the whole history of the F.L.Q.; or he was taken down in a special operation of the police security and information service.

That latter operation would have been run by Trudeau-appointee and fellow Iron-Curtainer, Jean-Pierre Goyer. 2

The identity of Bachand’s executioners is unknown, although Fournier gives this account of the possible penetration of Bachand’s residence by camouflaged security agents:

[Translation:] In Paris, Bachand was living with a young arts Professor from Occitan University, Pierre Barral, [401] who had links with the “Mouvement pour la défense des prisonniers politiques québécois” [“Movement for the defence of the Québécois political prisoners”, meaning the F.L.Q. terrorists:KM]. Very few people are aware of his refuge at Saint-Ouen, other than a few contacts he believed he could trust such as François Dorlot, a militant of the P.Q. close to the F.L.Q. at the start of the 1960s. Bachand was aware, however, for some time, that he was being followed; he had told his sister Michèle, a member of the executive of the M.D.P.P.Q. that he believed so, and his friend Clermont Bergeron of the C.S.N. who had come from Montreal to see him a few days before his death.

[…]

[Translation:] According to the testimony of Professor Barral, when Bachand was away from the flat, the night before his assassination, two young people called on him, one of whom seemed to be disguised as a female transvestite. They said they had fled Quebec and that they needed help. They told Barral: “François doesn’t know us personally, but we know him.”

However, what is truly remarkable about Bachand’s execution whether it was carried out by Trudeau and the RCMP or not (and it was murder of a Canadian, if it was) is that it was “ordered” by an elite Communist, Jean-Pierre Goyer. Goyer’s appointment by Communist Trudeau as head of Canada’s national police is discussed by American anti-Communist Alan Stang in an extract of his 1971 article at my blog:

“Another thing you need if you are imposing a dictatorship is control of the police. In Canada, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police are controlled by the Solicitor-General. So Trudeau made Jean-Pierre Goyer the Solicitor-General — when Parliament was not in session and could not question him. Goyer, it goes without saying, was a regular contributor to Cité Libre. Isn’t everybody? He was once arrested for staging a sit-in outside the office of the Premier of Quebec. He has been involved in several pro-Communist fronts. And he has attended Communist meetings behind the Iron Curtain. Like his friend Trudeau, he is a revolutionary.

This is the man now running the national police of Canada.”

So, the man “running the national police of Canada” ordered the execution of an Oswald look-alike (Bachand) who frequented the Castro-founded FLQ & was bailed out (in sufficient time to be able to shoot JFK, if that was his mission); and Goyer did so in final consultation with Castro’s best friend, Pilgrim of Moscow Pierre Elliott Trudeau.

Jean-François Lisée (the current Communist leader of the Communist Parti Québécois, elected on 7 October 2016), confirms in his 1990 book, Dans l’Oeil de l’Aigle that Bachand was intimate with Cuba prior to 1970 for at least a year and a half:

[Translation:] Three Felquists in a hurry to know all about guerilla techniques (François Bachand, Raymond Villeneuve and Gaston Collin) had already spent some 18 months in Cuba prior to 1970. There again, Langley had presented to the Secret Service representatives a defector who had told somewhat alarming stories about the training the Cubans were giving to the Quebecers. The CIA believed the testimony was reliable, but in Ottawa, the Mounties had their doubts. “We know from people who had seen them, that the Felquists in Cuba had no training, they were playing billiards in the hotel,” said one Canadian officer.”*

I, for one, doubt the “doubts” of the Mounties, which do not seem rational in the circumstances. François Mario Bachand and other terrorist leaders did not go to Cuba to play pool in the hotel lounge.

The assassination of Cuba-trained Bachand in effect protected the Communist subversion of Quebec, and Canada, and of North America, as currently then organized in the hands of the corporate fascists behind the secret committee at Power Corporation. This cabal, with links to the Red-friendly Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) which co-financed the 1917 Bolshevik “revolution”, had orchestrated the set-up of the Communist Parti Québécois. Power Corporation then had financed Communist Pierre Elliott Trudeau’s federal election campaign. It was clearly intended that Trudeau “negotiate” with “his own” Communist PQ to restructure Canada for Communism.

It is therefore my view that François Mario Bachand may well have been a marksman; he may have been recruited by Cuba locally; and he may well have been in Texas on the infamous day. Bachand most surely would have upset the “bourgeois” Communist apple cart of Power Corporation’s designer “political” party, the Parti Québécois, Power’s ultimate vehicle for dismantling and restructuring all of North America for corporate-fascist world government.
______

1 Just how “Red” was Pierre Elliott Trudeau? Read my exclusive English translation of Trudeau’s 7-part series for Le Devoir on the 1952 Moscow “economic” summit organized by V.V. Kuznetsov of Soviet Intelligence: “I’m Back From Moscow“.

2 Killing a Canadian citizen outside the law is hardly an “operation”. It is cold-blooded murder, for which those who discussed and planned it are culpable, whether they carried it out, or not. Goyer, Trudeau, and Starnes all should have been charged and tried at least for intent.

Robert Rumilly:
Two important authors on the communist infiltration of Canada are Alan Stang and Robert Rumilly. Please read my exclusive English translation of two chapters from Rumilly's 1956 book The Leftist Infiltration in French Canada (L'Infiltration gauchiste au Canada français).

ANTICOMMUNIST ARCHIVE & STORIES:

EXCLUSIVE ENGLISH TRANSLATION
of the 1972 manifesto of the Parti Québécois, calling for a Communist State of Quebec
Segments translated so far:

UPDATE 15 August 2016: 100% complete! First English translation of 1972 PQ manifesto for a Communist State of Quebec. This is what we were really "voting" for in 1980 and 1995. There is more text in the PDF download than is posted online in html: https://www.sendspace.com/file/pgg7mg

Communist Straight Jacket Over Canada: Quand nous serons vraiment chez nous: 1972 manifesto of the Parti Québécois for a Communist state of Quebec