5 comments:

Wow, it's dripping with subjectivity. And I thought the MSM was bad - this was far worse. But is it any different than the current MSM propaganda minus the polished nuance?

On the subject of a Trump news network, I remember reading a story about 9-ish months ago predicting that, win or lose, Trump would use his political anti-MSM popularity to start a news network of his own ($$$).

Isn't competition a good thing? Wikileaks exposed the MSM for colluding with politicians, so what's wrong with another news outlet? I'm fairly pro-Trump. I would much rather watch someone report on the good that comes from his policies as opposed to NPR (or similar) where the default narrative is always negative.

"I would much rather watch someone report on the good that comes from his policies..."

Is it a report on the good that is coming from Trump's policies, or is it telling people how good something is/will be for Trump's sake. Positive results can be corroborated by trusted non-news, objective sites. Propaganda is usually found out by those sites if allowed, legally, to exist. Hence Wenzel's critique of the Trump message.

Remember, the Democrat's theme song during the great depression was 'Happy Days Are Here again'.