Sunday, August 10, 2014

911 - Breakthrough: The Story Of Cathy T, & The Large Earthquake That Was Felt One Mile Away When WTC1 Was “Hit”!

Breakthrough: The Story Of Cathy T, & The Large Earthquake That Was Felt One Mile Away When WTC1 Was “Hit”!

By The Anonymous Physicist

Cathy
T. who lives, and works, in her apartment, which is about one mile
north of the WTC, has this breaking story. Furthermore, the following
events were witnessed by two people present with Cathy during these
occurrences. Cathy recalls these events occurred between 8:30 and 9 A.M.
on 9/11/01 Note that WTC1 was “officially hit” at about 8:46 A.M.

Cathy,
to the best of her recollection, recalls “about four seismic events” in
her apartment— which is between the 10th and 20th floor of her
building-- with “the first one being the largest”, and “the other three
were significantly less intense” and can now be seen to likely be
after-shocks, that “came in approx. 30 sec intervals after the main
one.” Cathy says she can never forget seeing “books fall off their
shelves”, and seeing or feeling the “floor jumping up and down”, and her
almost losing her balance at that time between 8:30 and 9.00 A.M. She
did not know, at the time about what was happening, or just happened, at
the WTC. She says she did not experience these things when the second
tower was “hit.” It is also important to note that Cathy T did not
experience any Seismic activity during either “collapse’ event.

All
this indicates the “official” regime Seismic recordings are a farce, as
I have previously written and had published here. The Seismic
“readings” admittedly are “re-analyses” of data, as requested by the
regime. Now according to the US Geological Survey, the “collapse” maxima
of 2.1 and 2.3 might not be felt even right where it was occurring, or
just barely felt and not cause the effects Cathy felt a mile away from
the first “plane hit.” Though I am a physicist and not a geologist, I
have been in 5.1 Earthquakes and have done some reading on these
matters. IMO, to be transmitted at such a level of intensity one mile
north, and possibly further, directly implies a seismic level of at
least 4.0, at the origin. There is always the possibility that wave
phenomena led to reinforcements at local hotpsots (perhaps anti-nodes)
which included her building. The spikes of the two “plane impacts” are
“officially” 0.9 and 0.7 respectively. Far greater energy than is
contained in quakes of these levels would be needed to cause the events
felt by Cathy T, a mile away. Thus, I assert, the “plane hit” spikes in
the seismographs were likely greatly truncated! (As were the
“collapse” spikes.) Now it is questionable whether a plane hit, or an
explosion, high up would transmit much energy to the ground as the
energy would likely first be absorbed by the building itself. But if a
simultaneous sub-basement nuke was set off, this would likely have a
large seismic spike that would need to be “re-analyzed/truncated” as the
gov’t requested.

So tying the eyewitness report of Cathy T. to
my earlier articles, it is likely that in the nuclear demolition of the
WTC towers, perhaps the largest nukes employed occurred in the
sub-basements, using the “plane hits” as “camouflage.” And that many
smaller nukes were used during the actual demolition-- along with some
conventional explosives as I have detailed previously.

Recall
also that earlier I have stated that other regime-released “scientific”
data is bogus. This includes the second AVIRIS (ground tempeature) data
set; and this has been massively verified by other data and countless
eyewitnesses, molten boots and more. And this article I wrote, also has a
fireman describing a seismic event during collapse that had to be
significantly more than a 2.1 or 2.3.

It
also contains: eyewitness testimony of firefighters believing they
were nuked on 9/11 from feeling great heat on their skin without any
fire near them, as well as early WTC7 destruction, Electromagetic Pulse,
non-impact plane flyby, and people being pushed out of a WTC tower.

From
the timing that Cathy relates, these seismic events appear to have
occurred around the time that the first (CGI) plane “impacted” the first
tower. This is further support for my hypotheses, appearing in my
articles, that each time a CGI plane “hit” a tower, (actually upper
explosions set off), the regime also set off a basement nuke. (As I
have written, to allow for bottom over collapse, in case the intricate
top-bottom collapse--which involved many mini-nukes--failed to occur. I
have written herein on the need for redundancy by the regime.) Recall I
have quoted engineers that stated that a sub-basement floor and garage
were “just gone,” and that a 50-ton steel press was vaporized, and that a
steel/concrete door was shriveled up like aluminum foil-- all at the
time of the first “plane hit”. (Statements made by Engineer Mike
Pecoraro. See:
http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/08/by-anonymous-physicist-sgt.html
and my other nuclear demolition articles at www.wtcdemolition.blogpsot.com)

Of
course all this, and the now revealed much larger earthquake(s) felt a
mile away, can only arise from nukes-- and not from gravitational
collapse of pristine pancakes, or evidence-free and cold DEW, or
thermite which never vaporized anything let alone whole floors and
massive steel presses. Neither does thermite stay hot for months and
cause the China Syndrome of radioactive fragments generating high heat
for months, and thus the molten metal still seen six months later. See
here www.wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com

So we now have eyewitness
testimony that larger earthquakes-- which directly implies nuclear bomb
use-- occurred on 9/11, than the regime has allowed to promulgate, via
its Goebbels-like MSM, or the intel agency-controlled “911truth” forums.

Subscribe To

Followers

Fair Use Notice

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, religious tolerance, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.