Sunday, August 19, 2018

Is prayer magic, mystery, or?

What is prayer? Is it magic, mystery, or something else

Prayer is not magic. Contrary to a widely held misunderstanding,
prayer is not a means of manipulating God to produce a desired result(s). No
formula, no action, no degree of sincerity in asking God to do something is assured
of achieving the desired result.

The occasions on which prayer leads to the requested result are
serendipitous. The results are actually attributable to other causes and not to
God if the full picture is accurately understood. Concomitantly, chalking up
failed prayer to receiving a “No” from God simply avoids the actual, underlying
issue of correctly understanding prayer.

Magic, according to the Concise Oxford Dictionary is “the
power of apparently influencing the course of events by using mysterious or
supernatural forces, mysterious tricks performed as entertainment.”

Believing that prayer is a means of obtaining specific
results from God has three major theological problems. First, the person
praying becomes de facto more powerful that God. God is reduced to the means of
gratifying the desire(s) of the person praying.

Second, prayers of this genre (e.g., heal this dying individual,
cure this person’s cancer, give me food for my starving child, etc.) are
sometimes answered and sometimes not. Consequently, God appears capricious
allowing some to die, some to eat, and so forth. If God genuinely loves all
people equally, then God would logically act lovingly toward all, thus ending
much suffering and death among both Christians and non-Christians.

Third, prayers of this genre typically require God to
intervene in the natural order in a way that contravenes natural law.
Illustratively, weather patterns are determined by geo-physical forces and
other natural factors. God bringing rain to parched portions of California now
ablaze with wild fires would requiring altering one or more of those ongoing natural
processes.

If prayer is not magic, is it mystery?

Conceiving of prayer as mystery is less problematic than are
the forms of prayer more akin to magic than genuine prayer. We advantageously
approach prayer as a human endeavor rather than attempting the impossible task
of discerning the presence or acts of the ineffable divine.

Thus, prayer may be talking (the verbal activity most
commonly identified as prayer), acting (as in performing a loving deed), or
meditating (practicing Christian yoga, for example). These acts may be therapeutic
for the person praying: talking to God may relieve emotional stress or provide clarity
about one’s ideas; acting may redirect the course of one’s life, prove redemptive
or restorative, or help to form virtuous habits; meditating has health benefits
demonstrated in repeated scientific studies. All of the above may offer signs
of God’s presence or activity if we posit that God desires and promotes both human
well-being and flourishing.

If God mysteriously acts to promote human well-being and
flourishing in ways that (1) do not entail any problems connected to
understanding prayer as magic and (2) are not directly discernible by finite
humans because of God’s ineffable infinitude, then perhaps prayer becomes
dialectical (God’s response to human talking, acting, and meditating) when
humans receive gifts of wisdom, courage, and strength to grow in love for God
and neighbor. Wisdom may connote what Whitehead called God luring a person
toward a particular direction, a direction which is always loving and
life-affirming. Courage may signify the assurance of God continuing to lure the
person God-ward after that first step, an interpretation that helpfully links
courage with hope. And strength may point toward a sufficiently strong luring
to overcome human inertia against moving in the God-ward direction, thus
linking strength and faith.

Approaching prayer as a mystery rooted in love, hope, and
faith coheres with a biblical understanding of God as light, love, or the ground
of being and with a twenty-first century scientific worldview.