Looking for the book?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 10 minutes.

Rating

7Overall

7
Applicability

6
Innovation

8
Style

Recommendation

Richard H. Axelrod presents a model for creating more effective change in an organization by involving everyone in the change process from the beginning. He suggests setting up large conferences with cross-functional, multidisciplinary planning and implementation groups. As this implies, he advocates combining planning and implementation, rather than creating parallel processes. He argues that the top-down approach of having a leader who sells a vision to the organization doesn’t work, although the leader should be involved in the conference process. It seems shortsighted to dismiss visionary leadership, with its successful track record in various settings, yet Axelrod has organized his ideas clearly. He provides tools for using his approach, including anecdotal success stories, how-to inserts, and guidelines for following this process. His model shares some characteristics of other conference planning approaches, including “Future Search.” However, getAbstract recommends this engagingly written book for its appeal to executives and top managers who seek intriguing planning and change strategies.

In this summary, you will learn

Why traditional change models don’t work; and

What the four principles of the new “engagement paradigm” are.

About the Author

Richard H. Axelrod and his wife, Emily, developed the conference model. Axelrod worked with Peter Block and the Association for Quality and Participation to develop the School for Managing, an innovative approach to management education. He has worked as a consultant and teacher for more than 25 years. His clients have included British Airways, Bell South, First Union Bank, Harley Davidson, Hewlett-Packard, and Intel.

Summary

Why Traditional Models of Change Don’t Work Traditional models for change don’t engage employees, and thus they don’t work, because without engagement, lasting change is not possible. Most organizations and consulting companies now use a “change management paradigm,” which has these flaws...