Poison gas scientists won't be charged

Poison gas scientists won't be charged

GOVERNMENT scientists who tested poison gas on soldiers more than 50 years ago will not face charges, the Crown Prosecution Service has announced.

The CPS said there was insufficient evidence to bring charges against the tests at Porton Down which killed Consett man Ronald Maddison.

The Crown Prosecution Service announced a decision not to prosecute in July 2003 but promised to reconsider that decision in the light of evidence presented during a 2004 inquest into Leading Aircraftman Maddison's death.

An inquest jury concluded unanimously in November 2004 that Maddison, 20, from Consett, County Durham, was unlawfully killed in May 1953 when he dropped dead shortly after drops of Sarin nerve gas were placed on his arms at Porton Down.

In a statement, senior Crown prosecutor Kate Leonard, who conducted a review of the Porton Down files, said that there would be no criminal charges as a consequence.

She said: "I have decided there is still insufficient evidence available to prosecute any person with a criminal offence over the testing which was carried out."

A verdict of misadventure was initially recorded on Maddison's death at an inquest in 1953. But the findings of Wiltshire police's inquiry, launched in 1999, into Porton Down's human testing programme persuaded Lord Chief Justice Woolf to order the second inquest into his death.

A verdict of unlawful killing was recorded after the inquest heard Maddison had been taking part in what he believed were tests to find a cure for the common cold.

Last month it emerged that his family had been given 100,000 in compensation by the MoD after it abandoned a high court judicial review application on the second inquest's verdict decision in February.

Ms Leonard said: "In reaching these decisions I considered the evidence from the inquest into Mr Maddison's death to see whether it had any impact on my previous decision. I also looked at recent cases, which have been before the courts since 2003, which have clarified the legal issue of consent."

She added: "It was considered proper in light of the age and, in some cases, failing health of the potential suspects to reach a decision in 2003 as to whether the evidence then available provided any realistic prospect of conviction despite the then forthcoming inquest."

Ipsoregulated

This website and associated newspapers adhere to the Independent Press Standards Organisation's Editors' Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about the editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then please contact the editor here. If you are dissatisfied with the response provided you can contact IPSO here