Advocacy – Bicycles Network Australiahttp://www.bicycles.net.au
The Top Australian Cycling PortalFri, 16 Feb 2018 10:17:37 +0000en-UShourly1Interview – Australian Cyclists Party Goals for the NSW Electionshttp://www.bicycles.net.au/2015/02/interview-australian-cyclists-party-goals-for-the-nsw-elections/
Sat, 14 Feb 2015 05:13:59 +0000http://www.bicycles.net.au/?p=13268On March 28, eligible voters in New South Wales will head for the voting booths for the State Election and the Australian Cyclists Party want your vote. But what are they doing to win your vote and is their political approach of create a strong minor party the right approach for cyclists? Bicycles Network Australia […]]]>

On March 28, eligible voters in New South Wales will head for the voting booths for the State Election and the Australian Cyclists Party want your vote. But what are they doing to win your vote and is their political approach of create a strong minor party the right approach for cyclists? Bicycles Network Australia (BNA) asked the party founder and president, Omar Khalifa (ACP) about the participation in the recent Victorian State Elections and their approach in the up-coming NSW elections.

BNA – The Australian Cyclists Party first contested in the Victorian state elections, what experience and lessons learnt will you now apply in the NSW elections?

ACP – Only a year from our first member signing up we were amazed that we even registered in time, never mind standing 17 candidates and attracting over 20,000 votes! Indeed we out-polled half of the other minor parties and not so far behind the larger minor parties that have been at it for quite some time – with significantly more resources. We certainly could have used a much broader network of supporters and time to get ourselves better known. More coverage at polling places would have also helped but with early voting and postal ballots the ability for minor parties to use polling day to get publicity and sway voters is diminishing.

BNA – Is winning votes as a smaller party about getting attention prior to the election or is it a spontaneous and sympathy vote on election day?

ACP – It is both. We need to be familiar to more people beforehand. While some people would have jumped at the chance to support a cycling party, many would be circumspect about whether we were legitimate or not and would need time to figure that out and socialise it with others.

Omar Khalifa promoting the Australian Cyclists Party at the Sydney Bike Show

BNA – While Australian federal election spending for the big parties is counted in the millions (and not billions such as in the USA), it is reported that Liberal and Labor outspend the minor parties 19 : 1, while the vote distribution is 4 : 1 (source). Would higher funding and pre-election spending be effective for the Australian Cyclists Party?

We raised just $5k specifically for the Victorian election. We don’t think it should take millions as it only creates the atmosphere of influence buying and public cynicism too. The irony is of course that the smaller parties need the exposure more than the larger ones who already dominate the headlines daily. And yet even our public broadcaster won’t provide free advertising unless you are already a significant party. A bit of chicken and egg…

The ACP unlike the major parties and some of the minor ones has no paid staff. Our overheads are low by design and we aim to stay that way but it does not mean we have no costs for election fees, web sites, software licenses, hosting services, posters, travel, etc.

So, yes, we could use more funding just to help raise our profile and pay for the basic electioneering tools and we hope to raise double the $5k figure for the NSW election.

BNA – What is the core message of the ACP heading into the NSW election, and is there any appeal to non-cyclists?

ACP – We are approaching the election with our focus to create a bicycle friendly NSW. We build that by addressing the key government areas of responsibility – transport, planning and health. Ours is a message that cycling can be part of the solution to some of today’s complex and expensive challenges. Cycling can also reflect the priorities of a community. A place that is cycling friendly is likely to have healthier people, better community interaction and be a great place to live. Just think of some of the best places in the world to visit and see how integrated cycling is into everyday life.

Pip Vice (previously Bicycle NSW) is running as a NSW candidate for the Australian Cyclists Party

BNA – Can you explain preference votes and with whom the ACP have a preference arrangement?

ACP – Curiously little is understood about one of the key pillars of our way of voting. Preferences are a way for a party or voter to ensure the “next best” party or candidate gets a chance to win. Preferences can be complex arrangements when there are multiple parties involved as the flow of the votes accumulates to those that are still in the race as the votes are tallied. Parties of course use these flows to bargain to their best advantage – perhaps in a swap even – we preference this candidate in this district if your preference ours there. Not every party will preference in every seat they contest.

In NSW, Lower House preferences are the ones that are most highly sought. While we promise to publish our preferences ahead of the election, not all parties do so. So it is incumbent on every voter to know that they can choose their own preference flow by indicating that on the ballot “below the line” by numbering the order the vote should flow.

BNA – Can you explain the role and connection of the politically orientated ACP in the increasingly busy domain of Australian Cycling Advocacy. It appears that many different groups operate in competition whereas most can easily complement one another and unite to achieve a common goal.

ACP – Cycling advocacy is not an easy thing to describe – there are official advocacy organisations such as Bicycle NSW and Bicycle Network and then there are Bicycle User Groups, Sports bodies, charities like Amy Gillett Foundation, various Facebook sites and even the BNA itself! With so many different roles, it is not difficult to see how groups may not always sound like they are coordinating or indeed have all of of the same goals. Ultimately, however, they all support increasing participation in cycling – it’s a unifying mission.

The ACP sees ourselves as a political arm of the greater advocacy effort. Arguably, much like the Labor Party was once the political arm of the union movement. We see our goals aligned in increasing participation but our unique offering is to roll up our sleeves and become political about delivering it. After decades of slow progress and some recent threat to reversals by those in government, we think it is time to get people in government that are committed to our goals and our approach to many of the associated community issues. Standing on the sidelines and wishing for better just isn’t enough. Look at the cities that have progressed and it is only because there is a leader in government that has pushed it along.

We also believe that the ACP can act as an independent party able to work across traditional ideological barriers and to offer up superior candidates that reflect values that most Australians will relate to. Our membership covers a broad range as well. We are a party of the times when people are turning away from the poor performance of those who feel entitled to rule just because they have been a major party – times are changing as we can see from recent elections.

In a way we are helping to turn back the clock on how Parliaments first functioned – to solve problems and help communities do better. One day I hope we won’t need a cyclists party, today thousands think we do.

—

Bicycles Network Australia would like to thank Omar and the Australian Cyclists Party and wish all candidates success. On January 24, the Australian Cyclists Party announced that they will be running 15 candidates for the Legislative Council (Upper House) and contesting for a further 7 in the following Legislative Assembly (Lower House) seats: Balmain, Newtown, Newcastle, Manly, Willoughby, North Shore and Goulburn.

Disclaimer: Christopher Jones is a (non-active and private) member of the Australian Cyclists Party. This interview was conducted by Bicycles Network Australia which is not aligned with any Australian political party. The intention is to publish cycling relevant advocacy news following their media release. Political parties are invited to submit cycling specific news and media releases for editorial consideration.

]]>Sophie Bartho Reveals Bicycle NSW’s Roadmap for the Futurehttp://www.bicycles.net.au/2014/08/sophie-bartho-reveals-bicycle-nsw-roadmap-future/
http://www.bicycles.net.au/2014/08/sophie-bartho-reveals-bicycle-nsw-roadmap-future/#commentsWed, 20 Aug 2014 22:54:37 +0000http://www.bicycles.net.au/?p=12130Cycling advocacy in Australia took a major leap forward when Adelaide hosted Velo-City Global in May this year. It was also in May 2014 that the Bicycle NSW (Bicycle New South Wales) CEO Alex Unwin resigned and the organisation structure was changed, from a single CEO to appointing specialist Executives positioned as leaders for Bicycle […]]]>

Cycling advocacy in Australia took a major leap forward when Adelaide hosted Velo-City Global in May this year. It was also in May 2014 that the Bicycle NSW (Bicycle New South Wales) CEO Alex Unwin resigned and the organisation structure was changed, from a single CEO to appointing specialist Executives positioned as leaders for Bicycle NSW for their departments. The new public face of Bicycle NSW for advocacy is Sophie Bartho and after meeting her at Velo-City, I sat down with Sophie at the Bicycle NSW office to find out where the organisation is heading and how they are ‘competing’ in the busy cycling advocacy arena.

On the site of the Sydney Olympics in a quiet corner of Bicentennial Park, the Bicycle NSW headquarters lies between eucalypts and one of the best bicycle networks in the state. The staff are chirpy but busy and the foyer is stocked up with dozens of big plastic post boxes filled with envelopes for members… as well as bicycles.

The Bicycle NSW Office in Homebush, Sydney

Sophie knows that I have also come armed with challenging and controversial questions. But who is Sophie Bartho?

After running a successful design agency with 10 staff, she sold the business to become a carer for her elderly family members and to be there for her growing children. Returning to the workforce she wanted to use her “brand marketing skills for social change”. The opportunity to join Bicycle NSW in April as the Executive Director of Communications meant she could use her skills to make a positive social impact. This role also puts her at the forefront as the spokesperson for bike riders in New South Wales.

Rather than using the word cyclist, it is about being a bike rider. Sophie explains “We try to avoid using the word cyclist because people immediately have a vision of lycra. We have a really diverse audience for riders of all ages, on different styles of bicycles and riding experiences.”

While the organisation encourages diversity, racing cyclists with sporting motivation are more likely to be part of a cycling club so are represented through Cycling NSW. Many of the 20,000+ Bicycle NSW members and supporters join because of the advocacy activities, the insurance cover (which excludes racing) has also become a big drawcard.

Although Sophie has only been in the role a few months, she takes on a huge responsibility for an organisation that needs to re-invent itself and grow. While other state organisations appear to dominate the media landscape and proactively represent bike riders, in New South Wales the City of Sydney Mayor Clover Moore and the Amy Gillett Foundation appear more visible. I asked Sophie what happened to this organisation which is now almost 40 years old.

“We have lost our voice and our power to articulate that voice recently. I want to get that back. Whilst we haven’t had a prominent media profile recently, much of what we do goes on behind the scenes. The board made a very conscious decision a few years ago to ensure that as a peak organisation we were at the table when decisions affecting cycling were made all across the decision making spectrum. We have been successful in this- we have excellent relations with the key Government agencies at all levels, state and local. We know there is a demand for advocacy through the increase in cycling and bike riders need representation,” says Sophie. “I am spearheading the team to define what we stand for and why do we exist and to actively increase our communication of this.”

What is holding Bicycle NSW back?“I think it was a combination of reasons, first and foremost communication. An awful lot goes on here, we are doing a lot in terms of advocacy and yet we’re not telling people what that is.

“We are also a small team with the equivalent of five full-time staff,” continues Sophie. “When you consider that we are running Sydney’s largest recreational ride, Spring Cycle, we are running Discovery Rides in regional NSW, we are running the Gear Up Girl event for women riders of all skill levels, we are running workshops and training, we are leading the advocacy across NSW and we are working for a supporter base of 20,000+, that is a lot for five people.

Planning is well underway for the 2014 Spring Cycle
As a state organisation it is not just about Sydney. Regional New South Wales is part of the focus and representing bike riders across the state. There are 33 Bicycle User Groups (BUGs) across New South Wales who are affiliated with Bicycle NSW and many more who are ‘friendly’. The BUGs benefit from insurance cover as well as training and support with events and advocacy endeavors. The local knowledge that the BUGs offer allows Bicycle NSW to run or support cycling events and these in turn attract bike riders from across the state. These local hubs also allow Bicycle NSW to better represent bicyclists and cycling issues from across the state in talks with the government.

Commercialisation of Cycling Advocacy
As an outsider, it appears that other state advocacy bodies and national bodies such as the Amy Gillett Foundation (AGF) have commercialised. The AGF, led by CEO Tracey Gaudry, has created a business style organisation structure and grown an attractive portfolio of corporate sponsors and supporters.

Bike SA (Bicycle South Australia), led by CEO Christian Haag, draws on the organisation’s wealth of knowledge and provides consulting for business and governments. At Velo-City Global, Haag confirmed during his presentation of Bike SA activities, “We are a business!”. Haag notes that this is not solely about ‘dollars’, rather it also encompasses a business approach to their ‘knowledge wealth’ and influence in politics and with all stakeholders in achieving the objectives of Bike SA.

“The commercialisation of Bicycling NSW is something that we are working on and exploring.” explains Sophie. “My personal opinion is that I am not a fan of the term “not for profit”, I would like to see Bicycle NSW get to the point where we are able to make a profit and what we do with that profit is most important. We need more support and funding to create campaigns and programs including: encouraging children to ride regularly, encouraging more people to commute by bike to and from work, shops, etc., and importantly campaigns to impact tangible behavior change around safe cycling and driver behaviors, mutual respect and shared space for all transport modes‘.

“Our events are there for participation, and opportunity to demonstrate the ease and joy and access of bike riding. They are the best in the State and we need to commercialise those events.”

Pip Vice is part of the energetic Bicycle NSW team based in Homebush

Choosing the Right Partners
Despite the best intentions to generate a positive cash-flow and return into cycling advocacy, choosing the wrong partners can be a step in the wrong direction. The Amy Gillett Foundation was publicly criticised for their partnership with the overseas online retailer Wiggle by the Australian distributer of Garmin and Stages Cycling, FE Sports. The Amy Gillett Foundation responded that the necessary financial support from the Australian bike industry simply wasn’t forthcoming and havn’t experienced public criticism for this decision from their supporters.

The Victorian state cycling advocacy body Bicycle Network Victoria (previously Bicycle Victoria) have a lucrative collaboration with soft drink giant Coca Cola which has raised eyebrows across the country and also generated media interest regarding the roll-out of the partnership.

Addressing the question of ‘good partners’, Sophie Bartho says “Partnerships are critical and will be a big part of our future, and have been a big part of our past including partnerships with government agencies that have supported our events including Transport for NSW, the Police and the City of Sydney. With event funding from government declining, Bicycle NSW will need third party and commercial support.

“We have significant assets in terms of our events and knowledge – so how can we work with other organisations who can benefit? With our mission to create a better environment for cycling, I believe we need integrity so it is important that we pursue like-minded organisations and brands. That can be hard, we have had numerous discussions recently where we ask ‘Is that sufficiently aligned, can we really justify it?’”

Chief Financial Officer Brian Fong has been with Bicycle NSW since 2005

Competition among Advocates
Each state and territory in Australia boasts a state based cycling advocacy group and in recent years have been joined by ‘specialist’ advocacy groups such as safety focused groups including Amy Gillett Foundation and Safe Cycling Australia, rider education groups such as Aust Cycle, groups against the mandatory helmet laws (e.g. Helmet Freedom), and online communities including the Australian Cycling Forums, as well as Sydney Cyclist and Brisbane Cyclist forums.

The growth in cycling has seen an increase in almost competitive behaviour by some advocacy organisations. In one such maneuver, Bicycle Network Victoria recently opened an office in Sydney and announced their intention to become the representative body for bike riders in New South Wales.

When queried, Sophie responded, “I found it disappointing. Down at Velo City Adelaide all of the states [advocacy organisations] met and talked about ‘how do we work together’. We are representing our states which is really important and have local knowledge, expertise, history and relationships. If we can all come together and demonstrate an alliance at a national level that would be very powerful. To be having those conversations while another state [organisation] comes and opens an office and is actively competing is disappointing.”

As one of the prominent national advocacy groups, I asked Sophie about their relationship with the Amy Gillett Foundation, “The Board of Bicycle NSW decided a number of years ago that we would work with other advocacy groups when we have shared objectives. Resources in the sector are so scarce that we don’t compete just for the sake of it and if someone is best placed to deliver on programs, promotions and/or advocacy we would prefer to support them than duplicate what they are doing. Safer riding is absolutely part of creating a better environment for cycling. And we work with the AGF on road safety.

“We have co-created ‘It’s a Two-Way Street Campaign’ and we actively support their ‘1 metre minimum safe passing distance’. Bicycle NSW has a very different business model to AGF. The advocacy work we are doing is much broader than just safety, we are working with the RMS & TfNSW reviewing their large infrastructure plans and how we can increase bicycle riding usage. It is a very supportive and collaborative relationship with the AGF.”

The Controversial Bicycle Topics
Any individual or organisation trying to promote and advocate cycling invariably comes across a few topics which can rapidly divide the cycling community. But rather than ignoring these, supporters often demand that a position is taken. Let’s investigate the official position of Bicycle NSW on some of these.

1 metre safe passing distance:
Sophie acknowledges the Queensland state legislation (in trial) and the activity of the AGF. “We would like to see the legislation changed in NSW. The clarity of the message is where it is most powerful. It is an easy message for everyone to understand and it can have a positive impact on behavior and attitudes and most importantly cyclist safety and road user awareness. We fully support the 1 metre minimum safe passing distance. We have said this to the Government and we intend to keep doing so to get it trialled in NSW.”

Mandatory Helmet Laws (MHL):
Australia is regularly criticised by recognised international bicycling advocates for the helmet laws which have been responsible for reducing cycling participation. In the Australian Cycling Forum a single discussion thread discussing Australian Mandatory Helmet Laws has over 7,000 individual posts.

How does Bicycle NSW approach this? “The debate rages, however it is 2014 and we have MHL’s which have been in place for many years. In terms of where Bicycle NSW put our energy and focus, reverting those laws is not our current priority. It is one of the most controversial topics within the bicycle community and we feel that in terms of priorities and what is going to create a safer environment for cycling, the “1 metre minimum passing distance” legislation is a priority.

“Other priorities include advocating and championing for improved bicycle infrastructure, wherever possible separated cycle paths and integrating the existing network. A big priority is encouraging more people to ride more regularly. Advocating against licensing or registration of riders and bikes is another major priority for Bicycle NSW.”

National Alliance of Advocacy Groups
There have been many attempts in the past to gather all of the invidual advocacy organisations together to achieve a greater political leverage. Sophie discusses this opportunity, “At Velo-City they announced the World Cycling Alliance. To me it makes sense to have an Australian Cycling Alliance or rather Australian Bicycle Alliance.”

Despite the meetings at Velo-City, it is unlikely that Australia will see see a true unity of all advocacy groups in the near future. Differences between groups, power-struggles and even the long distances remain a constant challenge for any individual or organisation considering the notion.

The Cycling Promotion Fund (CPF) however have recorded success in creating some collaborative efforts as CEO Peter Bourke comments, “The CPF is supportive of a unified national advocacy approach. We have delivered projects such as Vote4Cycling which have unified advocacy groups across Australia and plan to support a national advocacy approach in the future.”

A fresh start for Bicycle NSW
With 20,000+ members and supporters, Bicycle NSW is already a strong organisation, however it needs to take action and become progressive and visible. Leading the advocacy and communication for Bicycle NSW, Sophie Bartho is acutely aware of her role and her responsibility driving the organisation forward. Commercialisation is inevitable, an investment which positively aligns businesses with bike riding and allows the organisation to re-invest.

Reflecting on the challenge ahead, Sophie Bartho leaves us with a reminder, “the bicycle, a very simple, very humble piece of engineering can solve so many social issues.”

Find out more about Bicycle NSW membership and the Spring Cycle event on October 19 online: www.bicyclensw.org.au

]]>http://www.bicycles.net.au/2014/08/sophie-bartho-reveals-bicycle-nsw-roadmap-future/feed/122014 Adelaide Velo-City Global Conference Wrap Uphttp://www.bicycles.net.au/2014/05/adelaide-velo-city-global-conference-wrap/
http://www.bicycles.net.au/2014/05/adelaide-velo-city-global-conference-wrap/#commentsFri, 30 May 2014 14:35:23 +0000http://www.bicycles.net.au/?p=10516The past week has seen a flurry of cycling activity around the city of Adelaide. For the “cycle passionate” this was signified by the Velo-fringe festival although you should have also noticed the Velo-City signage on buildings and bicycles around town. Adelaide was the host of the international annual event which connects cycling advocates and […]]]>

The past week has seen a flurry of cycling activity around the city of Adelaide. For the “cycle passionate” this was signified by the Velo-fringe festival although you should have also noticed the Velo-City signage on buildings and bicycles around town. Adelaide was the host of the international annual event which connects cycling advocates and planners – people who are working to achieve improvements in government policy, community integration, and infrastructure and planning to better accommodate cycling.

The main conference spanned four days and there were a number of other official and unofficial events surrounding Velo-City Global. The conference traditionally takes place in the northern hemisphere and so hosting Velo-City in Adelaide is a coup for the Australia; visitors representing local councils, state and federal government departments as well as advocates benefit from the knowledge of the international panel of speakers.

The visit to Australia was also an eye opener for many of the international delegates who were confronted with the reality of life on Aussie roads. For example, the mandatory helmet laws (whether you agree with them or not) were repeatedly questioned.

From a conference dominated by cycling enthusiasts speaking and in the audience, there were plenty of opportunities to nod in mutual agreement. But far from being one big ‘feel-good’ experience, a host of simultaneous sessions explored themes into the deepest facets of cycling; case studies of cities and projects, cycling politics, cycling safety, town and infrastructure development, economics of cycling, technologies and cycling, and challenging the stigma of cycling… to name just a few. Adam Spencer hosted fast paced ’spin cycle’ presentations which provided even more insights and ideas while many of the sessions encouraged discussion and audience question and answer.

Question and Answer sessions at Velo City in Adelaide

For experienced practitioners, there was a mountain of information to re-enforce and encourage but also plenty new information and gems. A narrow selection of standout ideas and concepts follow:

Danish consultant Niels Hoe (Hoe360) highlighted the value of cyclists bringing in business revenue. Where a motorised journey takes an individual from from A to B, a cyclist is on the other-hand is more flexible to stop, park and shop when traveling and provides more opportunities for business and removes the rigid centralisation of businesses.

Niels Hoe of Hoe360, Denmark

A common theme that was addressed by many speakers, including Niels Hoe, was concentrating on creating smaller, lower cost and reversible infrastructure for alternative transport. This infrastructure can be trialled before a fully fledged introduction or adoption and importantly, if it doesn’t work or is a failure, it can be easily be reverted. This approach is ‘politician friendly’ as politicians are notorious for backing popularity and success. It remains important for decision makers to commit to do something rather than to holdback indefinitely to chase the dream of absolute perfection.

Some of the ideas presented at Velo City which can facilitate cycling growth are so obvious that it becomes increasingly difficult to understand government reluctance to cater to cycling. The American speaker Larry Frank approached the topic of health benefits with hard data to show that the savings on health spending for the economy would be far greater than the investment in infrastructure and increasing cycle participation rates. And to create a fair system, Frank argues that investment in the different transport options should be performance based – of course the return on investment for cycle transport trumps car transport.

Many of the speakers focussed upon “the cyclist” as pre-defined audience group because the media typically stigmatises “the cyclist” as the sports cyclist… or lycra-glad road warrior. In reality, a cyclist represents a far broader group and is more effectively represented by the every-day person in normal clothes who choses a bicycle as the most suitable transport for a journey. Patrick Morgan from the Cycling Advocates Network in New Zealand which represents 28 cycling bodies went so far as to exclude ‘lycra-clad’ sports cyclists from a role of cycling advocacy and positive cycling promotion to the disappointment of many in the audience. The general consensus was that an internal conflict between different rider types is futile when the goal is advocating and promoting cycling.

Patrick Morgan of the Cyclists Advocate Network in New Zealand

Normalising cycling by showing cycling as an every day activity where riders can wear normal clothes can help change the media perceptions that cycling is only a niche activity. The women orientation Frocks on Bikes movements have proven popular as they demonstrate to other women that bike riding can fit into their everyday lifestyle and they too ‘can look fantastic’.

Patrick Morgan struck a chord when he discussed the role of bicycle riders in society today “you can’t talk about blacks, cripples or gays the way that people talk about cyclists”. The comparison with homosexuality and the achievements of the gay community in achieving equality was recognised by a number of speakers. Another New Zealander and openly gay Auckland politician Christopher Dempsey stated that he has more rights in society as a gay man than as a cyclist.

Sjors Van Duren from Arnhem Nijmegen in The Netherlands introduced the theme of building an identity for his regions cycle infrastructure, branding was created and reflected throughout the cycleway with lighting, artistic and creative installations plus digital integration to further encourage riders. Frequent riders can ‘trigger’ more advanced features in an artistic light installations when they pass. This theme of ‘creating a sense of community’ was also approached by a number of other speakers.

Sjors Van Duren from The Netherlands

Peter Bourke from Bicycling Industries Australia and the Cycling Promotion Fund highlighted the traditional dis-unity and power struggles between advocacy organisations in Australia which limits potential for more effective and far reaching positive influence and action. 2013 saw the first occasion in which all of the major cycling advocacy and communities groups were united to promote the #vote4cycling campaign and the CPF aim to facilitate more collaboration and joint action between all of these groups who are, more or less, trying to achieve the same goals.

While this is only a brief snapshot of some of the themes, one of the most exciting speeches was the the final speech by Florian Lennert of Innoz who discussed intelligent cities using Berlin as a prime example. While cities are mean to be urban spaces for people, the focus has changed to make them about ‘the car’ and this needs to be challenged. But it is not just about the bicycle – instead the transport alternative that make sense. Private car ownership in cities doesn’t make sense for most people, (electric) car sharing however is progressive alternative. Beyond bikes, other small mobility devices such as Segway or even (kick) scooters can be highly effective transport options in cities.

Florian Lennert from Innoz, Berlin

For the average cyclist the indirect advantage of Velo City is that there is a lot of activity in the background to make your world a better place.

It was refreshing to meet so many mayors and representatives from councils across Australia (including from my own municipality). The local governments are important to cycling as 80% of the roads are within these jurisdictions so it is fair to ask, if there were no representives from your local council at Velo-City in Adelaide, what are they doing for cycling?

]]>http://www.bicycles.net.au/2014/05/adelaide-velo-city-global-conference-wrap/feed/5Cycling Safety in the wake of the Melbourne Dooringhttp://www.bicycles.net.au/2014/03/cycling-safety-melbourne-dooring-crash/
Thu, 20 Mar 2014 04:55:10 +0000http://www.bicycles.net.au/?p=10263What was most shocking about the dooring incident on Monday night in which a female cyclist was knocked down by a passenger exiting a taxi in Melbourne was that the passenger didn’t help the fallen cyclist, refused to provide their details and turned to insulting the cyclist. Cyclists are second-class road users; they are more […]]]>

What was most shocking about the dooring incident on Monday night in which a female cyclist was knocked down by a passenger exiting a taxi in Melbourne was that the passenger didn’t help the fallen cyclist, refused to provide their details and turned to insulting the cyclist. Cyclists are second-class road users; they are more vulnerable in a collision, their rights on the road are often uncertain and, as a motoring nation, cyclists are not exactly welcome on the roads.

In the dooring incident on Collins Street in Melbourne, the Victorian police confirmed that the cyclist was riding legally and was allowed to pass the stationary cars on the left. The taxi wasn’t parked and it is has been noted that the taxi driver intended to pull-over further ahead to drop off the passengers. It can be fiercely debated whether the driver or the passenger is accountable in this situation however this collision highlights a lack of awareness of cyclists and the rights of cyclists.

Thanks to the bicycle camera footage and significant social media, newspaper and television coverage, wealthy businessman Jeff Hunter came forward and apologised for his behavior. Whether there are any consequences is a matter left to the police and the cyclist who was hit.

Returning to the actual collision, neither the taxi driver nor the passengers anticipated the cyclist and this is a common theme in dooring. In other collisions where the driver sees the cyclist, but proceeds to cut them off maliciously or carelessly, the vulnerability of cyclists is not taken into account. Motorists are safe inside modern vehicles that have been designed to protect the driver in a crash whereas a cyclist will always comes off second best in a collision.

In the ‘Motorist verses Cyclist‘ debate, the crux of the issue is that cyclists want to be safe using the roads however are seen as an inconvenience by some motorists. A peaceful coexistence can be achieved however is hindered by the lack of infrastructure, road user education, consistent law enforcement as well as the perception of cycling in our society.

Improved and sensible cycling infrastructure serves all road users, cyclists are better separated from motor traffic which means less inconvenience for motorists and increased safety for bicycle riders. The Federal government demonstrated in their 2013 report (Walking, Riding and Access to Public Transport) how valuable cycling can be for the economy and for society. That is all well and good but all levels of governments need to think long-term and invest and that often contradicts the short-term Government cycles and short-term goals for the political party holding office. A handful of local governments such as the City of Sydney and Mayor Clover Moore are taking cycling infrastructure and facilities seriously. The proposed 284km Inner Sydney Regional Bike Network which extends on the City of Sydney bicycle network has the opportunity to unite 14 surrounding council areas but is up to the Federal Government who are ‘considering’ it.

Page from the Federal Government Report: Walking, Riding and Access to Public Transport

Road user education begins with children and continues through to drivers license tests and beyond with road safety campaigns. If we think about the confusion surrounding laws pertaining to roundabouts, it suggests that the authorities need more effective strategies for road user education. And this education also needs to extends to cyclist who also have a responsibility to obey the law and set a good example. The Amy Gillet Foundation has taken on the road user education challenge as one of the most prominent advocacy groups in Australia. They are seeking improve cyclists safety and in addition to the current ‘a metre matters’ petition to lobby politicians for a mandatory 1 metre (minimum) passing distance for cyclist, they recently launched a road safety campaign targeting both cyclists and motorists.

Law enforcement is important for cycling safety as a deterrent however has a number challenges. A cyclist on the road is treated as a vehicle although without the protection of the motor vehicle, any collision, let alone near miss is far more frightening and far more life threatening than for a motorist. The police however are reluctant to take action for a near miss or dangerous or illegal behavior unless there is a collision. And if there is a collision, the penalties for the at-fault motorist often appear disproportionate or inconsistent, this isn’t helped by different laws in each state and even different practices between police stations. The Australian Cyclists Party is an endeavor to represent cyclists rights in politics and along with the Cycling Promotion Fund, seek to get cycling issues into the political agenda.

Cyclists in traffic on Sydney roads

Traditionally, Australia’s infrastructure has hardly taken cycling into account, ‘The Car’ is ingrained into our culture. Changing the perceptions of cycling is however a slow process. Through infrastructure, laws and education, the place of cycling as part of our culture and society can be improved. Tabloid media regularly inflames the “Motorist verses Cyclist” debate however it is not a war although it should be lot better. In 2013, 45 cyclists were killed on Australian roads. It needs to become a second nature to check for cyclists and also be considerate towards cyclists who are more vunerable.

As cyclists we need to take a stronger interest in our rights on the road, the most effective way is to choose and support a cycling advocacy organisation. By uniting to make progress in each of the facets that influence cycling safety and cyclist awareness, we can help create conditions that make many of these collisions avoidable.

]]>Vote4Cycling in the 2013 Australian Federal Electionhttp://www.bicycles.net.au/2013/08/vote4cycling-2013-australian-federal-election/
http://www.bicycles.net.au/2013/08/vote4cycling-2013-australian-federal-election/#commentsWed, 14 Aug 2013 04:58:15 +0000http://www.bicycles.net.au/?p=8912Let’s admit it, Australia is a motoring nation, big cities and urban sprawl have meant that cycling is traditionally reserved as a sporting pursuit. The recently released federal government report, “Walking, Riding and Access to Public Transport” confirms that ‘cycling is good’. Cycling saves the economy $21 per trip and communities benefit in the short […]]]>

Let’s admit it, Australia is a motoring nation, big cities and urban sprawl have meant that cycling is traditionally reserved as a sporting pursuit. The recently released federal government report, “Walking, Riding and Access to Public Transport” confirms that ‘cycling is good’. Cycling saves the economy $21 per trip and communities benefit in the short term from healthier people, less traffic congestion and less pollution. In the long term the benefits are more profound.

So what are we going to about it?
The Cycling Promotion Fund is leading the Vote4Cycling initiative which unites the biggest cycling organisations and communities in Australia to encourage the politicians to get cycling on the agenda. The Australian government has an opportunity and need to know that it is an important issue.

What is Vote4Cycling?
1. A community petition to show broad support of cycling issues and demonstrate the level of community interest to politicians. You can show your support by clicking the “Count me in!” button on the Vote4Cycling website.

2. A proposal called The National Partnership Proposal which was formed by experts and which the Government can implement to improve the viability of cycling in the community and reap the associated benefits.

3. A platform for candidates in the 2013 Australian Federal Election to publish their policy statement or proposed initiatives related to cycling and alternative transport. The community can see what each candidate stands for.

National Partnership ProposalThis six plan created by and endorsed by Vote4Cycling supporting organisations and communities delivers a series of detailed steps in which the government can foster cycling in communities across Australia as a national strategy:

What can cyclists do?
Support the initiative by clicking the “Count me in!” button on the Vote4Cycling website. You can also share and promote the vote4cycling initiative with the twitter hashtag #vote4cycling to your friends, colleagues and also to members of parliament who need to know that the cycling agenda is also an important agenda in this election and that there is a real community interest in a national cycling strategy.

]]>http://www.bicycles.net.au/2013/08/vote4cycling-2013-australian-federal-election/feed/3Empowering Aussie Cyclists – New Go! Fix App for iPhone and Androidhttp://www.bicycles.net.au/2013/07/empowering-aussie-cyclists-go-fix-app-iphone-android/
http://www.bicycles.net.au/2013/07/empowering-aussie-cyclists-go-fix-app-iphone-android/#commentsSun, 07 Jul 2013 23:00:46 +0000http://www.bicycles.net.au/?p=8598Bicycles Network Australia partnered with Go! Alliance earlier this year and our first big move is supporting the launch of the Go! Fix App for iPhone and Android which enables the community to report problems that their local government need to fix. View & Download: Apple iPhone View & Download: Android Devices The App is […]]]>

Bicycles Network Australia partnered with Go! Alliance earlier this year and our first big move is supporting the launch of the Go! Fix App for iPhone and Android which enables the community to report problems that their local government need to fix.

View & Download: Apple iPhone
View & Download: Android Devices

The App is free and convenient to use and BNA is promoting this so that it becomes the default option for reporting road and infrastructure problems – the more people using it, the more our councils take notice and the more problems get fixed. Other sites and organisations and user groups will also be promoting this app – so get on board, download and then register and lets get the potholes repaired and cycling infrastruture and facilities improved.

Go! Alliance which was founded by ex-Bicycles NSW CEO Omar Khalifa and who is responsible for bringing Go! Fix has a broader agenda to involve all transport groups – so even for motorists or people who who use public transport, this app can be also used to highlight problems to alert the local governments or authorities. More on go-fix.net

]]>http://www.bicycles.net.au/2013/07/empowering-aussie-cyclists-go-fix-app-iphone-android/feed/6On the Go! with Omar Khalifahttp://www.bicycles.net.au/2013/02/go-alliance-omar-khalifa/
http://www.bicycles.net.au/2013/02/go-alliance-omar-khalifa/#commentsTue, 05 Feb 2013 02:53:19 +0000http://www.bicycles.net.au/?p=7718Omar Khalifa came to the attention of Australian cyclists as the CEO of Bicycle NSW. While he worked hard for this state based organisation, his efforts were felt nationwide and cyclists began to feel that Omar might be able to do what no one else had ever done: unify Australian cyclists and give them all […]]]>

Omar Khalifa came to the attention of Australian cyclists as the CEO of Bicycle NSW. While he worked hard for this state based organisation, his efforts were felt nationwide and cyclists began to feel that Omar might be able to do what no one else had ever done: unify Australian cyclists and give them all a voice. Omar (and that’s how most people know him, just by his first name), during his tenure at Bicycle NSW, made it a point to engage with the media to raise the profile and issues of cyclists.

And then he disappeared. He resigned as CEO of Bicycle NSW, sparking rumours and confusion among the members, many of whom did not renew their memberships or transferred them to other cycling organisations in other states. People wondered what would happen next, but no one knew what Omar had in store – maybe Omar didn’t either.

Omar reappeared on my radar via a mutual contact, with something called the Go! Alliance. Nothing more was forthcoming about this venture until Omar contacted BNA about joining the Go! Alliance. Since we had interviewed him before, we jumped on the opportunity to interview him again and find out more about what he was doing. Like the first time around, he was eager to engage with us and gave us this frank interview via email.

BNA: As the head of Bicycle NSW, you were vocal and pro-active on cycling issues to the point where the cynics were paying attention and smelling some sort of change in the winds – a cycling Barrack Obama of sorts. And then you vanished, almost overnight. What happened?

Omar: It was a great opportunity to lead BNSW and put into practice what I (as a previous member) thought the organisation lacked. I believed I had the mandate and full support of the board to do this. But that turned out not to be the case and there were numerous divisions within the board and with the future of BNSW and its strategy and culture that I ultimately could not see myself being able to work through. As I was only ever there to make a difference, I chose to leave on good terms rather than be left unable to carry out the rest of what I came to do.

Nevertheless, we did turn a lot of things around including flagging membership, gaining better media visibility, improving financial sustainability, better online interactions, more progressive advocacy, better regional presence and turning around our ride event strategy. I was fortunate to have a team that was really enthusiastic and supportive of this new direction. I hope things did improve but I leave it to your readers to decide.

Still, I certainly enjoyed getting to know a lot of wonderful people and a whole different side of cycling and advocacy and so have decided to try to carry on in a different way. Oh, and I became captivated by the amazing history of cycling in Australia!

BNA: I know through mutual contacts that after Bicycle NSW you re-emerged with something called the Go! Alliance. Tell us about that.

Omar: When I left BNSW I was urged by some to start a new organization to compete with BNSW or to run for a board position and to help reform it. However, taking on the organization or the board held no interest for me. I was motivated by all of those folks I had engaged with to take my insights and to see if there was another avenue that would help make a difference for cycling and cyclists.

For starters, I had come to appreciate that:

1. Individuals, BUGs and other groups working at the local or regional level were under-resourced and often struggled to engage broader support or even modest financial backing for their initiatives. We are a sorry bunch in this way – often leaving a few amazingly dedicated people to do a lot of the tedious and under-appreciated work that benefits us all.

2. While new online petition and fund raising tools were coming online, that little effort had been made to re-purpose them for advocacy activities for improved cycling and other transport options – locally or nationally. Resources to help advocates were not easily found when needed.

3. There was no coordination among the various state and national groups across the sustainable transport sectors. Some even undermined each others’ efforts to get their agenda at the head of the queue.

4. With leaders like the Lord Mayor of Sydney making a push for better transport choices in the face of strong opposition; and some states balking at doing more, this was the time more people had to be engaged to help see things through.

5. Australia had a fantastic cycling history – a now nearly forgotten time when cycling was at the centre of every day life and sport and quite literally helped build this nation. This was a legacy that deserved to be celebrated and also honoured through our actions today.

After engaging with others and wondering who else would address these issues, Go! Alliance was formed. It is an online based initiative focussed on helping others activate change at the community and national level through leverage of tools, information and one another.

It is by financial necessity a modestly scaled effort that will seek to be responsive to changing needs and using primarily an online engagement approach. Our constituents will by and large be reached through existing online communities and other organised groups. We hope to attract all forms of resources that will donate time (legal, financial, design, sponsorships) or effort towards the goals of Go! and to share both the challenges and successes of group effort. We have already suceeded in securing matching funds from BIKESydney for crowd funding projects there and hope more will do the same.

Success is not certain in any new initiative, but if the community finds that we can accomplish more working in this new way, then it will have been well worth the effort.

BNA: You mentioned the goals of the Go Alliance; What are they? What does the Go Alliance do and plan to do?

Go! will also strive to fill the gap between online communities, BUGs and clubs and finding new ways to achieving results – a critical missing link. The scope is national and includes all transport modes as we are about re-balancing not exclusion.

BNA: So how does the Go Alliance sit on the organisational spectrum? Is it a non-profit? A consultancy? A community voice? A tool of big business? Basically, who is behind it and how does it operate?

Omar: As a starting point, Go! has been registered as part of a business though profit is not the primary motive for doing this. We do want to have the flexibility of a business and be able to finance what we need. While I suppose that we are indirectly advocating a general direction the primary output of Go! Is to make it easier and more effective for others to get involved themselves or to support activities of others. Part resource centre, part consolidator, part adviser but 100% about achieving better outcomes.

Our advisory board is headed by the former mayor for Bogota and world-reknown advocate for better urban transport, Enrique Penalosa. We also have CPF board member and ex-professional cyclist Stephen Hodge; previous Sydney Councillor John McInerney and Cycling evangelist, Nick Bonich. A number of others have made themselves available to help out and I welcome approaches from others who believe they can contribute.

BNA: BNA has decided to join with the Go! Alliance. Why should we (BNA) or other organisations be involved in it? What are we going to get by allying?

Omar: BNA has a great national following and is a natural constituency for Go! Alliance to be engaged with. We look to support those who will be inspired to take action. Whether it is a local issue or a national one. An invention or a new guide book. So, rather than looking for members, we are looking for those willing to either lead or support others who want to take action towards our overall stated purpose.

So far we have helped raise money for a CPF campaign, paid for a talk by cycling historian Jim Fitzpatrick, and helped fund a new pedle tram for Sydney. Through an online petition we have also helped overcome a decision by North Sydney Council to shut down its sustainable transport advisory group and are now doing a submission to the Commonwealth in the petition format.

We are hoping to ad legal support to assist assessing or challenging counterproductive measures. We are also hoping to have in kind support from transport consulting companies that may assist in design issues. We also invite suppliers of products and services that can help to play a part to make themselves known. By consolidating we can expect to leverage everyone’s efforts.

We are also open to ideas from the BNA community on how else we can be effective – at the end of the day this really is about being effective. We will not solve everything or much right away, but we believe that we can help do more.

BNA: On the BNA forums, one user (jules21) has opined that, with most cycling advocacy, there is an elephant in the room: “the embedded cultural tendency for Australians to view cyclists as second class road users”.

Omar: While I can empathise with that view, I don’t buy in that this has to be the way it is. Cyclists once created and ruled the roads and trails of Australia. Most of today’s roads were classified as cycle tracks first. Australia grew on the back of a bicycle in the early 1900’s and kept us entertained, took us to war, challenged and answered the characteristic wanderlust we have always had as a nation. The fact that bicycles were shunted aside with the advent of the motor vehicle does not mean it needs to always be so. The returns are fast diminishing for more cars and more roads. That monotheistic approach has quite literally run out of road.

However, he time is now to find a new balance and to help create a base of support that is not only about cycling but about more liveable and sustainable places to live, work and play. This is what is happening in Sydney and in a few other areas but it won’t happen with much enthusiasm if it remains without galvanised and ongoing support.

BNA: While developing cycling infrastructure is a useful way forward, how is the Go Alliance going to address the battle for hearts and minds?

Omar: The current model of advocacy is running out of time. Many leading advocates have told me that there are few young people ready to step up to replace or help them – through the countless submissions, council meetings or planning briefings. The “clock speed” for many people today is just too high for accommodating or supporting this engagement approach.

The large cycling organizations are effective in some states and not in others. At best, they can focus efforts on large impact priorities but must defer others. This leaves much of the needed work still undone and too often just single transport mode focussed.

Go! is about supporting incremental change backed by pervasive change. My hope is that at the very least, Go! prove that there is value in new approaches to activating change and to appeal to people like the BNA community to get more involved. But Go! can’t do this alone, we need people who want to help with financial support, matching funding or in-kind services and heaps of individuals willing to lead or support actions. We will soon see if this formula works!

BNA: So if traditional advocacy is dying off, what can the motivated individual do? Are there avenues for small voices, or do they have to ride the coat tails of a bigger organisation and hope they get where they want to go?

Omar: There will always be a role for people to do the hard yards at council meetings and gathering information at briefings and leading protests. However, the influencing side is clearly moving in the direction of effective campaigns that mobilise people quickly and for a clear purpose. Politicians Tweet and engage much more dynamically and want to be seen being sensitive to the pulse of the people.

Reports and submissions are ineffective tools for politicians – unless they want to delay things or look to have been listening even when their minds are already made up! GetUp! has clearly demonstrated that motivating a lot of “small voices” to sing together rather quickly can deliver a strong message to politicians and their departments that they cannot ignore. It has broadened the base of those who are aware and engaged than would have been the case previously.

BNA: The Pirate Party has just been registered in Australia for the 2013 elections, and while small/single issue parties have had some impact on Australian politics, this is really the first time we’ll see a much younger, digitally connected and widely distributed voice. Do you think it’s time for cyclists to use the new advocacy to have their views better represented politically? Will the Go! alliance ever become the Go! party?

Omar: First let’s consider if there is indeed such a thing as a “cycling community”? We are a very diverse set of individuals with different cycling interests and affiliations that just so happen to ride a bike for one reason or another. For many (and this often comes as a shock to some) it is not the most important thing in their lives. Most are not affiliated with any cycling group, a few with BUGs (more so in NSW), some with state organisations and some with racing groups. While there is some common ground there is little to unite us in or our actions and that and that’s not even including looking at other modes of transport. The truth is that we seldom back each other up except in places like BNA. But even then we often fall short of taking united action.

On the other side of the table we LGA’s, road and transport authorities as well infrastructure authorities and Commonwealth departments. They are constantly engaged with an array of providers and those advocating more of the same. Is it any wonder that we don’t get a clear message across?

I believe there are three ways to come to terms with this:
The Shooters Party approach. Go for representation in a seat that can be won, hope for a coalition government that needs your vote and push a narrow agenda with great leverage. The Shooters could not have dreamed of a better situation to get support for changes that are abhorrent to most people.

Pick a party approach. Select one party that we believe most closely aligns to cycling and have them push the agenda and hope they get into power. The problem with this approach is both picking the wrong horse and then when in power, will they stick to their promises? The NSW Labor Party spoke the language of cyclists but did precious little in reality and the participation rates went to the bottom of the table. The Liberals came in and appeared to revel in the fact that they owed nothing to cyclists and in fact looked to be trying to reverse gains at first.

The mainstream, City of Sydney approach. Make the size and enthusiasm of an online and savvy coalition seeking a different approach become a well recognised lever that no party at any level of government can ignore. This is an apolitical approach that presses all parties to come up with ideas and solutions to ensure they don’t lose your vote. This removes the possible stigma of being a “niche” or “green” issue and the knee-jerk reaction that can cause even turn off some cycling supporters. This approach also implies creating a broader consensus that does not exclude other transport modes and attracts more people to want to be a part.

All approaches have their merits but the latter one means that a broader constituency could be built that ensures change comes no matter what party is in power. (As happens in Copenhagen I would love to see a competitive benchmark evolve of how many of each party cycle – or don’t drive – to their offices!). There is no reason that it should not become seen as arrogant and out of touch to be continuing to promote the dominance of traditional motor vehicle use. That’s where I hope Go! can come in to help inform and empower to get effective campaigns going at all levels even nationally as well when required – to help activate change. However, ultimately this will only work if a large enough number are willing to engage and that is far from certain.

But I do have to say I like the ring of a “Go! Party” and we could have some fun with our manifesto!

BNA: So what is Go! doing now? What will they be doing in the near future?

Omar: Go! Has already been testing the basic concepts of deploying petitions and crowd funding in support of community activities and the response has been encouraging. We are going to build on that and hopefully create a supporting web site that brings together these tools and the information and resources to enable more people to engage and activate change. It is our belief that unless we build a constituency that is ready to take action and back action that we are unlikely to motivate governments at any level to do much towards transitioning transport priorities.

So Go! will back others and look for opportunities to engage with those who believe in this approach and would also like to help the community. It could be a business or a BUG or even an LGA that commit in-kind or matching funds to promote activities that help make a difference. Already, BIKESydney is offering to match 1:1 moneys raised in any crowd funding initiative that affects cycling in Sydney. I think this is exciting as a model to get highly leveraged results to do so many things!

BNA: As individuals, how do we get involved with Go! ? If we do join the alliance (sounds like Star Wars, doesn’t it?), how do we get our views heard?

Omar: I think its about being motivated to help change the dynamics that got us in this transport mess in most parts of Australia. The momentum built up from decades of singleminded thinking that placed the motor vehicle at the top of the food chain needs to be thrown into reverse – at least to the point of achieving a more sensible balance in transport spending and options. We also realise that politics and means of influence has changed dramatically and yet little has been done to put those forces to use in this area.

All tha Go! Is trying to do is facilitate a new way for us to build and grow that support base by leading on some issues of broad importance (like the current Yes, Minister! Petition) or an event that may help promote the concept, but mostly by helping individuals, BUGs and others in the community to figure out how to take action, to get the funding and to attract the support that contributes to the common purpose. Over 300 individuals contributed to a Go! assisted online petition to retain the sustainable transport advisory group for North Sydney Council recently. It was a success.

Part of this approach is dependent on bridging the gap with online communities that often talk about issues but seldom have an outlet to truly take it to the next step in a coordinated way. It is a often discussed issue that online social groups are not good at getting behind things together.

I also hope we help those who don’t see themselves as advocates but want to get something done that would help – a bike rack for a school or a transport guidebook for the aged or designing a new mobility aid for someone with a physical challenge. We just helped fund the Pedal Inn, a bar on wheels that is propelled by the guests pedaling!

In the end it is not really so much about single or integrated transport modes but about the other side of the same coin and that is building friendlier and better functioning communities and cities that are healthier, kinder on the environment and a whole lot more fun to live in or visit. It won’t happen if we don’t begin to back ourselves and each other to activate the necessary changes. So, I guess I am just saying it is time for your readers to consider what they can do and how Go! could help them do it.

BNA: I need some straight answers from you Omar. Did you ever take banned substances to enhance your cycling performance?Omar: You should speak to my doctor, Mr. Lamborghini. He’s got all of the fast answers you could ever need.

BNA: Did you ever blood-dope, or use blood transfusions to enhance your cycling performance?Omar: I have certainly been called a dope, does that count? If anything I took was meant to enhance my performance then I’m clearly not going to be asked for an endorsement. I mean the Bloodmobile felt so sorry for me that they offered to give me blood.

BNA: Did you ever used other banned substances like cortisones, testosterone, or human growth hormone?Omar: This is beginning to feel like water boarding… alright already, someone call Oprah and let her know that I want to come clean but it will take three episodes minimum and I want soft lighting and angels singing in the background!

BNA thanks Omar for his time and for being a good sport. Omar is keen to answer your questions and you can engage him in a discussion in the comments below.

More information about the Go! Alliance can be found on their site.

]]>http://www.bicycles.net.au/2013/02/go-alliance-omar-khalifa/feed/3Cycling Promotion Fund Reminds Aussies about the Cycling Advantagehttp://www.bicycles.net.au/2012/09/cycling-promotion-fund-reminds-aussies-cycling-advantage/
Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:55:05 +0000http://www.bicycles.net.au/?p=6804One bus seating 69 passenger can replace a block of cars. Likewise the same 69 people on bicycles also replace a block of cars. The spokesperson for the Cycling Promotion Fund, Stephen Hodges says “The image succinctly illustrates the greater space efficiency of bus and bicycle travel” The Cycling Promotion Fund is an Australian bicycle […]]]>

One bus seating 69 passenger can replace a block of cars. Likewise the same 69 people on bicycles also replace a block of cars. The spokesperson for the Cycling Promotion Fund, Stephen Hodges says “The image succinctly illustrates the greater space efficiency of bus and bicycle travel”

The Cycling Promotion Fund is an Australian bicycle industry supported advocacy group that reaches out to the general public as well as political decision makers. They have recreated a 1991 photo taken in Münster, Germany which was used to promote alternative transport.

“As Australia’s population swells and our cities experience ever increasing congestion we need to get smarter about how we use existing road space” comments Mr Hodges “including investing more in alternatives such as public transport and cycling—if we are to move people more efficiently and effectively.”

The photographs are available for free to help promote the message of more efficient transport.

“Eight out of ten Australian adults still use a private motor vehicle to travel to work or full-time study, just 14% take public transport, 4% walk and a mere 2% cycle, with 30% of these trips in the cities under 3km” Mr Hodge said.

Australian Motorised Mentality
This week, a Sydney local newspaper reported Greenwich Public School digs in over bikes. A donation to fund bicycle racks at this North Shore public school was knocked back with the school responding “…the topography around the school is also very steep and generally not suitable for cycling, especially for young children.”

While safe cycling is important, existing infrastructure often doesn’t accommodate for cycling and the attractive short term option of forgoing cycling results in a long term disadvantage. More cyclists mean less cars and congestion, particularly when safe cycling routes are developed and motorised traffic is split from pedal powered traffic. The long term benefits of cycling also include a lower environmental impact and a healthier more active society.

Car drivers and Cyclists Head to Head
One of the biggest issues facing cyclists is that some car drivers feel impeded by cyclists on public roads. Even when the overwhelming majority of cyclists as well as car drivers (etc) obey the law, often drivers who feel obstructed will argue the rights cyclists. This is also reflected in government policy from the lack of spending on cycling infrastructure to (sometimes) half-hearted attempts at building infrastructure ignoring cyclists.

Though cyclists whether commuting, recreational or sporting only make up a small percentage of road users, creating facilities such as better cycleways or cycling lines not only affirm the legal rights of cyclists, but also draw more cyclists away from busy routes and onto cycle lanes and cycleways – a coexistence that both cyclists and motorists would welcome.
The Cycling Promotion Fund photo can be downloaded and used for free by organisations, groups and individuals for the promotion of cycling. More details on this photo are on the CPF website.

]]>The Cycling Promotion Fund gets an industry boosthttp://www.bicycles.net.au/2012/02/cycling-promotion-fund-industry-boost/
Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:32:38 +0000http://www.bicycles.net.au/?p=4981The Cycling Promotion Fund (CPF) is the peak advocacy and political lobby group for cycling in Australia and they have just announced a significant boost as six large Australian cycling importers sign-up. The General Manager of the CPF, Peter Bourke, commented on the phone today that CPF membership is based on it’s members paying a […]]]>

The Cycling Promotion Fund (CPF) is the peak advocacy and political lobby group for cycling in Australia and they have just announced a significant boost as six large Australian cycling importers sign-up.

The General Manager of the CPF, Peter Bourke, commented on the phone today that CPF membership is based on it’s members paying a percentage of annual turnover to the fund, so this will result in a greater financial backing for the CPF to pursue it’s activities.

The increased bicycle industry support of the CPF confirms their status as the leading body in the ongoing challenge to put cycling on agenda for governments. Australia trails behind many leading countries in integrating cycling into society and development of cycling infrastucture and community adoption is suffering without a stonger state and national committment.

The Cycling Promotion Fund is pushing the key messages of Increased Mobility, Improved Lifestyles and Liveable Communities. For member companies, their support also signifies the future importance (and growth) of urban cycling and cycling for transport in this country in which cycling has traditionally been viewed as a sport.

]]>World Car Free Day Todayhttp://www.bicycles.net.au/2009/09/world-car-free-day-today/
Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:11:33 +0000http://www.bicycles.net.au/2009/09/world-car-free-day-today/The World Car Free Day is going almost unnoticed in the Australia, though is developing momentum in Europe. With roots from the time of the 1970’s oil crisis, it become formalised in the years 2000 and is now an annual taking place each year on September 22.

The World Car Free Day is presented as a celebration and signal for the environment, city planners and politicians to give priority to cyclists, walkers and public transport. Internationally various events are organised on a community level. Australia has two single events, one in Fitzroy, Melbourne (sustainable transport) and one in Hamersley, Western Australia, (Walking SChool Bus). New Zealand is a step ahead with six events, two of which are cycling related.

Further information and details on world wide activities is available from www.worldcarfree.net