Take action for Liberty each and every day.
Support an open press. Teknosis' continued operation and existence crucially depends on your informative contributions, donation or paying forward, partnering with or purchase of items advertised here. Thank you.

It was supposedly issued by Florida’s Statewide Grand Jury. Note that the name and even the gender of the foreperson was not shown on the indictment. The signature looks like one of those robo-signers, not an average citizen, doesn’t it.

By the way, the judge, Victor Tobin, his majesty the clerk, Thomas Hall, and the persecutor, William N. Shepherd, have refused to disclose the names of the foreperson and the other citizens who are supposedly serving on Florida’s Statewide Grand Jury in spite of Florida law, Florida’s Constitution, the U.S. Constitution and the requests of several news organizations and concerned citizens.

I wonder if there really are any jurors on this grand jury or whether those who control it just want to keep any citizens from sending any of the grand jurors any evidence of crimes, don’t you?

By the way, since his majesty, Thomas Hall, shows that the Statewide Grand Jury was closed apparently on Feb. 17, 2010, since that was the date of the last docket entry, how can it issue an indictment on May 19, 2010? See http://jweb.flcourts.org/pls/docket/ds_docket?p_caseyear=2009&p_casenumber=1910As Patrick Henry said, "The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." I feel really secure knowing that according to these rulers, the secret Statewide Grand Jury indicted Jim Greer a couple of months after it was closed, don’t you?

Page 4, para 3 _ Clarification - S.D.R. Ambassador Leo E Wanta was never arrested and held in prison for fraud. The Cantonale du Bois - Lausanne Prison record clearly states : Detained by Surete - State of Wisconsin Income Tax Evasion. United States Embassy notified. No other information available.

USDollars 4.5 TRILLION LESS USDollars 1.575 TRILLION IN CIVIL/REPATRIATION INCOME TAXES _PAYABLE TO THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY _ AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA_APRIL 15, 2003

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF OPINION IN CASE NUMBER 02-1363-A

PRESIDING JUDGE, THE HONORABLE, GERALD BRUCE LEE

" THE COURT STATED THAT THE PLAINTIFF, AMBASSADOR LEO E. WANTA, SHOULD PURSUE LIQUIDATION OF HIS CORPORATIONS, RECOVERY OF THEIR FINANCIAL ASSETS, AND HE SHOULD PAY ALL REQUIRED TAXES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW."

On April 11, 2005, Mr Ashley Mote, Member of the European Union Parliament, addressed the Parliament as follows:

Transcript:

“Mote (NI). Mr President, I wish to draw your attention to the Global Security Fund, set up in the early 1990s under the auspices of Jacob Rothschild. This is a Brussels-based fund and it is no ordinary fund: it does not trade, it is not listed and it has a totally different purpose. It is being used for geopolitical engineering purposes, apparently under the guidance of the intelligence services. I have previously asked about the alleged involvement of the European Union’s own intelligence resources in the management of slush funds in offshore accounts, and I still await a reply. To that question I now add another: what are the European Union’s connections to the Global Security Fund and what relationship does it have with European Union institutions?”

Mote’s videotaped request has since been made a matter of the public record. It was at youtube.com on Aug 13, 2009 as well as numerous other sites. Mr Mote did not receive a response to his question. Consequently, he followed up later with a written request. Again, he did not receive a response on the then written request.

Mote’s web site (www.ashleymote.co.uk) gives his biography as follows: “Ashley Mote is an elected Member of the European Parliament. Representing the South Eastern side of England (since 2004) he carries the wishes of the voters to be free from the European Union. He wishes his country to govern itself again. He has made good use of taxpayers’ money to have his own EU paid for Campaign Bus which tours his Region informing everyone of EU waste and corruption. His website is full of video speeches where (he) eloquently does his job in EU Parliament pointing out EU Corruption. The EU is a tool of the New World Order. The UK is fighting back! Discover the real and corrupt face of the European Union.”

Ashley Mote also adds: “I have no quarrel with the people of Europe. My quarrel is solely with their bureaucratic system of unitary government called the European Union. It has nothing in common with that greatest of Anglo-Saxon inventions - an accountable system of parliamentary democracy. The EU's interference in British affairs over the last 30 years or so has wrought great damage on so many aspects of our life and enterprise. It has virtually destroyed the British fishing industry. It has undermined our ability to feed ourselves. It sucks over £1.4 million every hour out of British taxpayers pockets. It has burdened British businesses with more than 30,000 regulations - every one of which we managed perfectly well without before we joined what was supposed to be a Common Market. And whenever I have asked ministers or other EU enthusiasts to tell me what the benefits of EU membership are they fall into a dumb and embarrassed silence.”

Whether it has been Mr Mote’s opposition to the EU or his embarrassing question about the Global Security Fund, something touched off the British government and it responded with a lengthy and detailed investigation into the life of Mr Mote. In time, the British government indicted Mr Mote for fraud and tried him in front of a British jury. He was found guilty of offenses totaling £65,506, occurred between February 1996 and September 2002 while Mote was living in Langley, West Sussex.

On Aug 17, 2007, the Portsmouth Crown court found him guilty of 21 offenses: eight charges of false accounting, eight of obtaining a money transfer by deception, four of evading liability and one of failing to notify a change of circumstances. The 71-year old Mote was sentenced to prison for nine months.

Christopher Edward Harde Story

In time, Mote’s famous short question to the European Parliament evoked some interest from other interested persons and he was asked or prompted to discuss the basis for his question. He traced it to a man he had known for years--Christopher Edward Harde Story of Oxford--a British author of many books, an investigative journalist, and publisher of the following newsletters: International Currency Review, Economic Intelligence Review, Global Analyst, Soviet Analyst, Arab-Asian Affairs, Eastern Europe Analyst, World Reports, and several other occasional titles.

In a later tribute to Story, Mote said that much of Story’s best investigative work was done in the USA, where he had highly valued internal sources of information within the Federal Reserve Bank, the CIA, and within the financial and political communities as a whole. He noted that his speech on the Global Security Fund, made in Brussels, was based on a briefing made to him by Story.

Mote added in his tribute: “Like all speeches in a plenary session it was recorded on videotape and can now be found on literally scores of websites around the world. Even today, almost five years later, new postings of that one-minute speech are regularly uncovered by the Google search-engine.” In Story’s briefing to Mote, he said that while the Global Security Fund is cloaked in secrecy it was made possible by the US Federal Reserve banking system.

After this information leaked out with some of the work of Story, Mr Story died on July 14, 2010 of “liver failure.” Though Mr Mote’s tribute to Story (at the Mote web site) did not raise any questions about the death of Story, many other reporters and analysts have done so. Some have suggested that Story was assassinated with some type of poison which damaged his liver to bring on death.

In the timeframe of Mr Mote’s question to the EU parliament and subsequently with the arrest and conviction of Mote and the death of Story, numerous conspiracy investigators have begun looking seriously at this so called Global Security Fund. It prompted a reader of the Goldsmiths to send me an email with a suggestion that I check into it. I have done considerable research and find the issue to be vast in scope but worthy of my take in this Goldsmiths.

Ronald Reagan

My research suggests that the Global Security Fund started back on Dec 4, 1981 under President Ronald Reagan when he signed Presidential Executive Order 12333 (now Title 18, 6 US Code on Government Intelligence Corporations). Title 18 Section 6 corporations can be owned by the U.S. government, or not, and can be run by intelligence operatives who may legally disguise their intelligence agency affiliations and can deny they exist. The umbrella company involved with the Global Security Fund was called the AmeriTrustGroup Inc.

The associated funding was to be held in corporate shell companies in off-balance sheet, off-shore accounts. Companies could be established abroad by U.S. intelligence agents to supposedly identify threats. For example, in most countries if a drug shipment worth $200 million is reported and seized, an informant can earn a percentage of the shipment’s value. Thus, per one internet article, Title 18 Section 6 corporations established by American intelligence agents can earn vast sums of money while reducing international drug traffic. Money laundering and other major crimes can supposedly be identified and prevented by allowing intelligence operatives to establish corporations that appear to participate in those and other illegal activities.

Evidently, the initial funding for the Reagan project came from the US government/Federal Reserve Bank with later additions from up to 200 different foreign and domestic entities to the tune of $27.5 trillion (the fund is now believed to be worth $60 to $70 trillion from investments, financial market manipulations and other activities). While it is not clear who these 200 funding contributors/providers were, suggestions made suggest various other central banks and private investment and commercial banks. One web site has it that the following central banks contributed to the fund:

Banco de la Republica, Colombia

Banco do Brasil

Bank of Uganda

Canco Central de la Republica Argentina

Central Bank of Kenya

National Bank of Hungary

Nepal Rastra Bank

Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe

Although not named, it is highly probable that the Rothschild controlled Bank of England, the Swiss National Bank and various European central banks also made major contributions to the fund.

The purpose of the fund was at first supposedly set up to financially undercut and sabotage the old USSR. In the post Cold War era, the mission changed to influencing and directing the activities of Russia, China and various Eastern European nations for western capitalism (surely to benefit the Rothschild Cabal of bankers). In time, the mission was expanded again to encompass most of the globe in intelligence activities, spying, sabotage, bribery of foreign officials, creating internal disruptions among Rothschild enemies, revolutions, assassinations, manipulating financial markets, etc.

For the initial set-up, CIA agent Leo (or Lee) Emil Wanta was selected. Wanta was both an intelligence and financial expert. He was reportedly the CIA contact man at the Federal Reserve Bank. Wanta went to work and recruited/selected the people needed to run this network. He established numerous businesses around the world. Also, he allegedly owned numerous other businesses as well--legitimate businesses belonging to him. Possibly there was a commingling of funds in Wanta’s personal businesses and those supposedly owned by the Global Security Fund. Now, in more recent years, Mr Wanta and some of his associates have become involved in litigation both in the US and abroad to retrieve or obtain some of the funding involved (as will be explained below).

Dastych web log had an article on the Wanta Plan and Global Security Fund which said: “As a part of the administrative functioning of the Fund, Reagan/his successors adopted and amended as desired a series of protocols to govern the monies raised (possibly in an after effect scenario in the vein of the termination and dissolution of the Fund) which provided that each of the following states should receive five thousand million dollars: Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Mexico and Spain. Additionally, thirty thousand million dollarswere to be paid to the Russian Federation. China, in turn, is owed thirty billion dollars by virtue of other agreements reached with the United States Tax Office relating to the Leo Wanta funds. Apparently this arises from China’s purchase of treasury bonds from the United States.

“The money is reportedly handled by means of instruments known as CHIPS (New York Clearing House Interbank Payments System). During the years of negotiations and court cases, when agreements were reached on various occasions both with Leo Wanta and with the countries involved, the CHIPS turned out to be hollow. That is, they existed as accountancy entries but when it came to liquidate them there was no money backing them. This was because the banks holding them had siphoned off the money to other accounts by means of the false payees we have mentioned, angering the countries who were to be beneficiaries. During the years that Wanta was denied access to the funds, Clinton, Bush and accomplices had used complex financial systems to spirit them away.

“Reports from British analyst Christopher Story indicate that these funds were on the agenda at recent G-8 summits, and that their non-payment has led to China ceasing to use the dollar its oil transactions, essentially, with its main supplier, the Islamic Republic of Iran. Particular reports by Story reveal that last June these funds, supposedly to be used in state terrorism operations should have been returned to Wanta’s jurisdiction, under the supervision of the International Court of Justice of The Hague. Ever since then, however, an endless succession of delays and interruptions have occurred, involvingthe Rockefeller family, the Rothschild family, Queen Elizabeth II, German Chancellor Angela Merkel,lawyers, judges and political heads of various other countries, all placing obstacles in the way of the liberation of these funds, which would be sufficient to solve the greater part of the problems in the world.

“Currently, many banks worldwide have frozen the secret accounts of these 1,500 operators, so that the conspirators can no longer operate with the funds as before, when they traded using the tax free accounts. British member of the European Parliament, Ashley Mote, is the only such figure to speak out publicly on the issue of these funds. Story’s reports further indicate that these funds, hidden away in secret accounts, are being paid to terrorist organizations.”

As far as Leo Wanta, in later years, he became a representative/ambassador for Somalia in Switzerland where he was arrested and held in prison for fraud. Reportedly, there was an attempt on his life by poisoning while he was in prison.

The US Court Action

The above backdrop promoted a 2002 lawsuit by Leo Wanta in US District Court to liquidate the fund, pay off creditors, return capital contributions to rightful owners and recover his own alleged $4.5 trillion held in the Global Security Fund.

On April 15, 2003 Judge Gerald Bruce Lee, in case number 02-1363-A filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, issued an Order and Memorandum of Opinion. In it, the Court stated that the Plaintiff, Ambassador Leo E. Wanta, should pursue liquidation of his corporations, recovery of their financial assets, and he should pay all required taxes in accordance with the law. The amount of money involved in the Wanta international corporations to be liquidated was $27.5 trillion.

At worldreports.org on Global Analysis, International Intelligence had this backdrop on the case:

“On or about April 15, 2003 the Honorable Gerald Bruce Lee, in Case Number 02-1363-A filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, issued an Order and Memorandum of Opinion for the referenced numbered case. As part of the Order and Memorandum of the Court (in the referenced case) the Court stated that the Plaintiff (in the referenced case) should pursue liquidation of corporations, recovery of financial assets and pay all required taxes in accordance with the law.

10. Petitioner initiated contact with numerous third parties, including United States elected, nominated, appointed and career employees plus foreign countries, for the purpose of recovering financial assets.

11. Upon best information and belief in December 2005 and January 2006, Secretary Snow (Secretary of the Treasury at the time) and Chairman Greenspan (Chairman of the Federal Reserve at the time) traveled to the People’s Republic of China. The Chinese required confirmation of Petitioner’s signature to facilitate cooperation of the Chinese in completing the transfer of financial assets referenced herein. Upon best information and belief Snow/Greenspan determined that Chinese officials had the ability and willingness to cooperate with petitioner in the recovery and transfer of substantial financial assets that had been in the care, custody and control of the Chinese for an extended period of time.

12. Premised on the representations of Secretary Snow and Chairman Greenspan, the legal services of Troutman Sanders, LLP and Jenkens & Gilchrist Parker Chapin, LLP (attorneys) were used to complete the preparation and administer the execution of agreements and documents referred to collectively as ‘settlement documents’. The following is a compilation of the significant parties that are represented as either obligors and/or beneficiaries of the settlement documents:

• Petitioner Wanta identified in this petition.

• Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (including but not limited to Land Baron/Xeno).

• National Security Agency (NSA).

• Department of Homeland Security.

• Director of National Intelligence.

• United States State Department.

• United States Department of the Treasury.

• United States Department of Defense.

• The White House, including but not limited to the Offices of the President and Vice President.

• C.B.I.C. Inc. (Mr William Bonney Sr.).

• China (PRC), France, Great Britain, Germany and other foreign nations participating under one or more international ‘Protocol’ including but not limited to the Reagan-Mitterrand Protocol agreements.

• Others of interest not intentionally omitted as part of this petition. The entirety of the financial assets mentioned in the settlement documents prepared by the above mentioned attorneys concerns approximately $27 Trillion United States Dollars in value. The portion attributable and payable to the petitioner is $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars.

13. In May of 2006 the People’s Republic of China caused a free and unrestricted transfer of $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars through international bank fund transfer facilities to an account at Bank of America located at Richmond, Virginia. The designated beneficiary of the transferred funds from the People’s Republic of China was Petitioner herein. This transfer was made by the People’s Republic of China solely and exclusively as a requirement under the mentioned settlement agreement.

14. Upon best information and belief between the dates of July 31st to August 2nd of 2006 the United States Department of the Treasury, without authorization of either the remitting party or the receiving party removed the People’s Republic of China transferred financial assets from Bank of America Richmond, Virginia to an account in the name of Goldman Sachs at CITIBank New York, New York as the beneficiary holder of the monies transferred by the People’s Republic of China referenced above. This ‘Chip’ (Clearing House Interbank Payment) transfer was facilitated from Virginia domiciled banks to New York domiciled banks via the Federal Reserve Bank Richmond. The Chip transfer did not remove the name of Petitioner as the intended recipient of the transferred money from the People’s Republic of China. The transfer to the Goldman Sachs et al account at CITIBank put a lawless restriction that the funds were not to be released to Petitioner without the authorization of United States Treasury. At or about the time of the unauthorized transfer mentioned in this paragraph 14 Petitioner protested the alleged right of ‘entitlement’ by Secretary Paulson and to facilitate protest of right of ownership under the ‘Securities Acts’ accounts were opened in the name of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. at Morgan Stanley, fiduciary client account at CITIBank/NYC to receive direct deposit transfer of Petitioner funds from Goldman Sachs.

15. The Petitioner has been contacted by ‘Compliance Officers’ that are contract employees of the United States Department of the Treasury that the transfer records of the United States Department of the Treasury and the recipient (past and present holder of the funds transferred to Petitioner by the People’s Republic of China) reflect that the accounts opened to receive the financial assets are tagged and coded for the benefit of the Petitioner. Access to the tagged and coded accounts requires lawless authorization to be provided in writing by Secretary Paulson. To date Secretary Paulson refuses to provide the required written authorization to the compliance officers. In addition one or more compliance officer (referenced herein) has been contacted by Secret Service Agents who have advised the compliance officers that the ‘White House’ ordered that the compliance officers cease and desist from communicating in any manner with Petitioner.

16. Upon best information and belief the compliance officers mentioned in paragraph 15 have been in contact with law enforcement officers representing the Central Intelligence Agency and the United States Department of Defense. These mentioned law enforcement officers confirm that the information provided by the compliance officers is true and correct and that upon best information and belief the ‘order’ preventing Secretary Paulson from releasing the ‘tagged and coded’ funds that are the sole and exclusive property of the Petitioner have been either lawlessly and individually controlled by Secretary Paulson and/or restricted through direct participation by other United States of America elected and/or nominated officials.

17. Upon best information and belief Troutman Sanders LLP and Jenkens & Gilchrist Parker Chapin LLP, seeking legal recourse on behalf of C.B.I.C. Inc. (Mr William Bonney Sr.) and the People’s Republic of China obtained an Order to Show Cause Why a Writ of Mandamus Should Not Be Issued from the United States Supreme Court signed by Justice Ginsberg. The People’s Republic of China, as a foreign government, invoked the original jurisdiction authority of the United States Supreme Court to obtain the document signed by Justice Ginsberg. Upon further best information and belief the responding parties to the action filed in the United States Supreme Court are exercising any and all assumed defenses to ward off the issuance of the Writ of Mandamus.

18. The United States Department of Justice and/or any agency or investigative authority contacted has refused to assist Petitioner in the collection of lawful funds. Said parties refuse such assistance irrespective that there is clear and undisputed evidence that the subject funds are identified in official United States government agency documents as being the sole and exclusive property of Petitioner. As of the date of the filing of this Petition, all requests for payment of lawful funds have been ignored by any and all elected and nominated public officials that have the implied and apparent authority to complete all requirements of the settled documents.

• The Petitioner has personally had conversations with one or more officials at the United States Department of the Treasury and said officials confirm the sequence of events concerning inward remittance of subject funds from the People’s Republic of China and inter-bank transfers within the United States.

• Petitioner confirms that he has personal knowledge about the ‘Claims and Background’ set out in this Petition and verifies upon penalty of perjury that the same are true and correct.

• Petitioner has fully and completely reviewed the content of this petition and certifies by sworn affidavit attached hereto that the ‘Statement of Claim and Background’ are true and correct.

• Upon best information and belief ‘Respondent’ individuals, agencies, public, private, nominated and/or elected have knowingly, overtly, covertly and with specific intent conspired together to defraud Petitioner. The individual and/or conspiratorial acts amount to a violation of the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 (as amended in 1970), the Bank Privacy Act, the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, specifically R.I.C.O. and applicable international and national money laundering restrictions. In addition it is further the mentioned Respondents’ acting individually and/or ‘acting in concert’ violate Petitioner’s rights under the provisions of H.R. 3723 as the same pertains to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties.

“Reasonable action has been taken by the Petitioner in an attempt to obtain explanation and/or under what authority Respondents are not allowing the ‘Rule of Law’ and permitting access by Petitioner to the financial accounts referenced herein. Despite continued written notice and request for a response the named parties continue to avoid their legal obligations and continue to commit covert and/or overt acts in furtherance of their knowing and purposeful violation of the statutory references mentioned hereinabove. In furtherance of this petition for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus Petitioners direct this Court’s attention to the letters and other communications that have been marked as Exhibits A, B and C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if the same were set out in their entirety in the body of this petition.’

“Wanta filed this AFFIDAVIT with the Court: ‘The undersigned, being fully advised by counsel of the seriousness of the claim of making false statements to a Court and being fully apprised of the consequences for committing perjury (and the associated penalties), hereby make the following statements concerning the petition for Writ of Mandamus being filed on my behalf, by my counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia:

1. I am more than twenty-one years of age and I am a citizen of the United States of America.

2. For an extended period of time I am functioning as a representative, investigator, contract employee and/or facilitator of one or more assignments that were either executed and/or performed at the direction and/or under the supervision of one or more persons and/or agencies that were accountable to the Executive Offices of the United States Government.

3. During most recent three to five years I have been attempting to coordinate the repatriating of substantive financial resources from foreign locations to the United States and cause the tax payments owed on the patriated funds to be paid to the United States Treasury. I have substantially completed the stated objective task with the assistance of one or more foreign sources.

4. I have read the entirety of the Petition for Writ of Mandamus prepared by my attorneys. I confirm that I have personally directed communications with the banks, security firms, the United States Department of the Treasury (including one or more individual parties associated with the Treasury that are named as Respondents) and other entities mentioned in the Petition.

5. I have personally confirmed that the financial assets sent by the People’s Republic of China were received by Bank of America in Richmond, Virginia and that upon best information and belief the subject financial assets were ‘tagged’ in my name and transmittal instructions by the People’s Republic of China directed that the same be paid to me without offset or delay.

6. I have been personally advised by agents and/or contract regulation compliance workers, that are accountable to the United States Department of the Treasury, that release of funds sent by the People’s Republic of China for payment to me is being restricted and/or blocked by one or more parties.

7. The exact party and/or parties that are restricting and/or blocking payment of financial assets to my designated accounts is not known absolutely.

8. Upon best information and belief the United States Department of the Treasury has the power and authority to direct release of the funds for my unrestricted use.

9. Despite continued demand for release of financial assets (that were transmitted by the People’s Republic of China) for payment to me personally the demands are ignored and are not rebuked by any responsive communication.

10. I have been personally informed by parties, that have the authority to release the block on funds leveraged against recipient banking accounts established in my name, that directives have been received from known and unknown parties that have the effect of negating my ability to have free and unrestricted access to financial assets that are ‘tagged’ solely and exclusively in my name.

IN WITNESS HEREOF I am causing the above set forth affidavit to be notarized and sworn with full recognition of the penalty of perjury this 11th day of June 2007.

[Signed]

Lee E. Wanta, Leo E. Wanta and Ambassador Leo E. Wanta.”

Apparently, Wanta made efforts to access the money involved but was stalled and obstructed by various parties. This situation prompted another legal action, viz: “(2): Text of the Wanta Petition for a Writ of Mandamus as submitted to the court and published by this service [see archive] on 24th June 2007 and 5th July 2007:

1. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this cause of action pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 85, Section 1361 (mandamus), Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 85, Section 1331, and Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 85, Section 1332.

C. VENUE:

2. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 87, Section 1391, and Title 28 United States Code Chapter 87, Section 1396.

D. STATEMENT OF CLAIM:

3. Mandamus is regarded as an extraordinary writ reserved for special situations. Among its ordinary preconditions are that the agency or official have acted (or failed to act) in disregard of a clear legal duty and that there be no adequate conventional means for review. In re Bluewater Network & Ocean Advocates, 234 F.3d 1305, 1315 (D.C. Cir. 2000); Telecomm. Research & Action Ctr. v. FCC, 750 F.2d 70, 78 (D.C. Cir. 1984). Mandamus will be granted if the Petitioner shows ‘(1) the presence of novel and significant questions of law; (2) the inadequacy of other available remedies; and (3) the presence of a legal issue whose resolution will aid in the administration of justice’, see In re United States, 10 F.3d 229 at 931, 933 (2d Cir. 1993).

4. Petitioner has attempted to access monies that were transferred through international bank monetary clearing systems to financial institutions located in the United States of America. The remitting party was the People’s Republic of China, People’s Bank. The remitting party designated that the transferred funds were for the sole and exclusive use and benefit of Petitioner. The foreign entity that originated the inward remittance designated Petitioner as sole and exclusive recipient for the transferred money/financial instruments.

Irrespective of efforts proffered by Petitioner and/or agents and representatives of Petitioner, private and public individuals and entities, prevent Petitioner from exercising Petitioner’s legal right to the use, transfer and unrestricted ability to freely disburse said financial assets. The acts and/or omissions to act by named and unnamed Respondents prevent Petitioner (and others who are ancillary to this cause of action) from paying their respective tax liabilities to both State and Federal taxing authorities.

5. Upon best information and belief the organizations, entities, departments and individuals that prevent and/or restrict Petitioner’s lawful access to said money and securities include but are not necessarily limited to the following:

• Goldman Sachs et al including but not limited to past and present management and executive officers and members of the Board of Directors;

• United States Department of the Treasury including but not limited to Secretary Paulson, Deputy Secretary Kimmitt and other known and/or unknown parties working directly or under contract with the United States Department of the Treasury;

• Secretary Chertoff, Department of Homeland Security and other known and/or unknown parties working directly or under contract with the United States Department of Homeland Security;

• One or more known and/or unknown ‘compliance officers’ that act directly and/or under contract with private bank and/or security brokerage firms to observe rules and regulations of the United States Department of the Treasury and/or other USG investigative and reporting entities;

• Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Virginia.

6. Upon best information and belief Respondent acts and/or failures to act constitute a violation of the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 (as amended in 1970), the Bank Privacy Act and other non-specified banking regulations.

7. Reasonable action has been taken by Petitioner to obtain an explanation and/or under what authority Respondents are not permitting Petitioner to have access to the foreign transferred private business financial assets referenced herein. Despite written notice and request for a response the named parties avoid their legal obligations. In furtherance of this Petition for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus Petitioner directs this Court’s attention to the letters and other communications that have been collectively marked as Exhibits A attached hereto (2) and all of which documents, letters and Memorandum are incorporated herein by this reference as if the same were set out in their entirety in the body of this Petition.

8. The material, substantive and immediate financial loss to the Petitioner resulting from loss of financial benefit can not adequately be addressed in conventional judicial proceedings. In one more instances parties in position of knowledge, that can confirm the representations regarding interference in private business dealings, between Petitioner and third parties, have been placed at risk of physical harm by individuals representing to be fiduciaries of one or more of the Respondents. Additionally, the acts and actions of the Respondents prevent immediate payment of Federal taxes in the amount of $1.575 Trillion dollars into the United States Treasury.”

More Issues

Wanta used a Richmond, VA law firm (possibly Troutman Sanders, LLP or Jenkens & Gilchrist Parker Chapin, LLP). The name William Bonney stated above appears incorrect. The London paymaster involved in supposedly disbursing the funds was Lindell H. Bonney. Regardless, Wanta never received the funds. He made numerous attempts to gain control over the funds, pursuant to the Richmond, VA Federal court order (which was not appealed and which still stands valid today). He lost on the above 2007 petition but refiled it again in 2010.

Supposedly, there was a $4.5 trillion payment from China which reached the Richmond, VA Federal Reserve Bank where it was transferred to Citi Bank/Goldman Sachs/New York Federal Reserve Bank. The various websites addressing this case suggest that Wanta tried to get the Fed to honor the court order but was stalled with no satisfactory recovery. In time, the White House intervened and simply refused to honor the court order.

In subsequent years, other parties, like CMKM Diamonds Inc and Michael C. Cottrell (whose company, Cottrell Securities, Ltd in London handled the financial market investments and activities of the Global Securities Fund and is reportedly due $6.2 trillion from the fund), etc all claimed a share of this money and hired a law firm in Pasadena, CA (Hodges and Associates) to recover the monies. Various other institutions and governments per the protocols are entitled to a share of this money. Legal actions have been in the world court and possibly before the BIS in Basel. Numerous articles, letters and follow-up from Hodges and Associates can be found on the Internet.

The World Court Writ

In general, this comes from Hodges with a report that the Chinese went to the World Court to settle the issue in the form of perhaps $47 trillion or more involved in something called the US Dollar Refunding Project/US Gold Badge Signatory, as run form London (under the supervision of Lord Jacob Rothschild). Per Hodges, the World Court issued a writ of Execution and Lien on the US Treasury and the US Federal Reserve Bank called the World Global Settlement to release the $47 trillion due the Chinese and other monies involved (this data from Hodges suggests that the monies involved were at some point in time transferred to the US Treasury or Federal Reserve Bank, which funds may or may not have come into the US as the Treasury/Fed could be holding the money overseas).

This World Court writ reportedly produced a Basel List of beneficiaries (possibly the Basel List was tied to the Bank for International Settlements in some way). It revealed that Mr Lindell H. Bonney, Sr of the UK was chosen by MI 6 to act as paymaster in the matter. Supposedly, the requirements of the Basel List allegedly provided that $47 trillion be paid to the Chinese and possibly $6.2 trillion (separately or a part of the $47 trillion) be paid to Hodges’ client Michael C. Cottrell to an account with Morgan Stanley.

GlobalAnalysis.net addressed this World Court reported action with data from Christopher Story as follows:

“LIEN EXECUTED AGAINST TREASURY AND FEDERAL RESERVE IN THE SUM OF $47 TRILLION.

“Following further intransigent obstruction, the Chinese parties who obtained the necessary World Court Writ of Execution and Lien on the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve, duly exercised their powers and imposed the Lien on or around 6th December 2009. The Lien against the Treasury is in the sum of $47 trillion, which is approximately the aggregate identified by this service in 2007.

“As happened shortly after the ‘lockdown’ of the $14.0+ trillion sovereign funds including the $6.2 trillion LOAN money provided by the British Monarchical Power [referenced again below] on 10th-12th September 2008, when the Editor’s voicemail received a message consisting of a recording of three actual gunshots, two specific threats, mentioned in an Update to the previous posting, were received on Sunday 6th December 2009, the date on which the Lien is believed to have been implemented…

“SPECIAL CONFIRMATION OF THE LIEN OBTAINED BY THIS SERVICE. We have obtained special confirmation of the foregoing Lien intelligence, otherwise, self-evidently, we would not have published this information. Furthermore, we have taken extra precautions to ascertain whether publishing this would be liable to ‘cause any difficulties’, and we have been advised that no impediment to publishing it has even been hinted at, although the fact that we possess the information ‘is known’. Indeed you will have observed that we have waited for a number of days in order to be sure that this shattering intelligence is fully confirmed.

“We have been emphatically and authoritatively advised, since 10th December, that it is. We obtained reiterated confirmation of this intelligence, from New York, on 12th December.

“U.S. HIJACKING OF THE FOREIGN SOVEREIGN FUNDS. Within the $47 trillion is the previously mentioned $14.0+ trillion, and that aggregate in turn embraces the above-noted $6.2 trillion of funds stolen from the British Monarchical Power by the criminal US Government, to which frequent reference has been made in this column. Those funds were transferred by the Bank of England to the criminal enterprise, Bank of New York Mellon (as it became, effective 1st July 2007), on 19th-20th June 2007 under levy, as we reported at the time.

“Instead of disbursing the funds for the on-the-books Dollar Refunding Programme, as required by the sovereign LENDER, the named institution was party to a conspiracy involving other US criminal enterprise financial institutions, to divert and steal those real funds for use as a ‘platform base’ for leveraged financing operations to buttress their self-serving financial carousel.

“SOVEREIGN FUNDS PLACED INTO ‘LOCKDOWN’ ON 10-12 SEPTEMBER 2008. After this had become fully apparent, and in response to this Editor’s strenuous recommendation on 6th September 2008 that the $6.2 trillion, in particular, was being abused in this manner, and that this state of affairs was intolerable – and further, that irrespective of the consequences, the only language these criminals would ever understand would be the removal of the funds from access by them and their associates – the entire $14.0+ trillion (within which total resided OTHER, non-British, sovereign monies) were placed into ‘lockdown’ (i.e. beyond the reach of the criminal operatives at the US Treasury and elsewhere) on 10th-12th September 2008 – a development that triggered the extreme crisis that overwhelmed London and New York at the beginning of October.

“Coincidentally or not, scalar Hurricane IKE which developed on 13th September 2008 was probably intended to destroy the oil refineries and offshore oil platforms in the Houston area – the heart of the US oil industry. A sudden and temporary collapse of oil prices then followed, as did a quadruple witching day for commodities on Friday 19th September. Certain parties who had probably hoped to ‘make a killing’ that week, were wiped out instead.

“BRITISH MINISTERS APPEARED TO HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT THIS BACKGROUND. It has since become apparent that the British Government appeared to have NO CLUE as to these background circumstances concerning the ‘lockdown’ of the $14.0+ trillion, given the subsequent statements by Ministers such as the City Minister, Lord Myners, that the financial system was within hours of disintegration at a critical stage that October.

“A few days after the $14.0+ trillion was placed into ‘lockdown’, the Editor’s voicemail was enlivened (on the morning of 20th September) by a recording of three actual gunshots, as we reported at the time [see above]. This was an intelligence operation, as the recording could not be recaptured after being played the first time. The Editor subsequently received special protection during his visit to Washington and New York for the Annual Meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank in October 2008…”

The above report from Christopher Story included some speculation which would have tied to the question of the release of the $47 trillion to the US market melt down in Sep 2008. There were also comments allowing the use of these funds in manipulating the derivative markets as will be discussed below.

The CKMX Diamonds Claims

The following backdrop on the CMKX claims of $3.87 trillion (which may be a part of the $47 trillion or a separate claim) apparently comes from data released by its lawyer Hodges and Associates:

“A brief history of THE CMKX SHAREHOLDERS COALITION FOR JUSTICE shows it was formed for real shareholders of CMKM Diamonds Inc. and is currently attempting to force the truth into public. This is regarding the money set aside for them as a result of a multi government sting operation using the company and the shareholders as pawns to catch firms counterfeiting the stock market.

“The COALITION filed complaints with the RCMP, FBI/DOJ, SEC, and Texas State Bar Association. All are fully aware of the situation and the crimes being committed against CMKM Diamonds Inc and its thousands of shareholders. We have contacted INTERPOL, had our evidence forwarded to the Honourable Vic Toews, Minister of Public Safety for Canada, and forwarded to the Honourable Lawrence Cannon, Minister of Foreign Affairs in Canada. They are fully aware of the situation. Shareholders from the United States have put in correspondence to politicians in almost every state and asked for justice by the thousands to the Securities and Exchange Commission; all are fully aware of the situation.

“The authorities and our own company officials, due to non disclosures, were completely hiding the facts of the last six years from the retail shareholders of CMKM Diamonds Inc, so the COALITION filed a RECOL complaint with the RCMP in 2009, and entered evidence to the Nevada FBI in 2009. There was absolutely no real investigation into the allegations put forth, and the thousands of complaints put in by shareholders to the SEC were met with condescension and disrespect.

“The COALITION had already researched other sting operations run by the SEC/FBI/DOJ/RCMP along with other agencies, and had documented not only the inaction of the authorities but of criminal collusion to cover up the largest crime in history, the systematic counterfeiting of the stock market. This included influencing news agencies to cover up the story, which continues to this day. Corroborating evidence is available upon request, or can be viewed at http://cmkx.info .

“As a result of the inaction of all authorities involved and our own company, the COALITION filed a lawsuit against the SEC in the British Columbia Supreme Court On November 9th 2009, in Kelowna, B.C. for aiding and abetting the mass counterfeiting of the stock market in general and CMKM Diamonds Inc. in particular. We presented clear evidence in that case that the SEC aided and abetted the insiders of CMKM Diamonds Inc. in selling hundreds of billions of counterfeit shares in CMKX stock, and covered up the firms who sold hundreds of billions of counterfeit shares in CMKM Diamonds Inc.

“The lawsuit can be viewed at http://cmkx.info, and in particular the COALITION evidence against the SEC proves beyond a reasonable doubt the SEC/FBI/DOJ/RCMP and others aided the insiders to sell unregistered shares of CMKX stock, and in the cover up of several well known firms, including TDWaterhouse. Evidence that Canadian firms were not even on the NOBO lists, and that they were warned they were selling illegal shares and continued to do so, is available upon request.

“The COALITON put together several time lines with allegations and corroborating evidence from those involved directly in the fraud. The evidence included a short historical time line of SEC fraud, clearly showing they facilitated the mass counterfeiting of the stock market and its cover up with the authorities who were supposed to protect the public. A package is available upon request which easily proves the Head of Market Regulations at the time worked with the likes of Bernie Madoff to create a system that allowed the mass counterfeiting of the general public and purposely cover it up, lying to the general public.

“Regarding CMKM specifically, a historical timeline of events clearly showed the SEC/FBI had subpoenaed the records they used in current court cases against insiders of CMKM in September of 2004 and the SEC was contacted on each sale by the corrupt insiders of CMKM after September of that year, okaying the sale of the shares each time, hundreds of billions of shares. CMKM was clearly a sting operation or all authorities involved, including the RCMP/FBI/DOJ/SEC and others, aided the fraud. This evidence can be viewed at http://cmkx.info and can be used by all shareholders as they see fit.

“The fact is, it is easy to prove this was a sting, but for this action the shareholders of CMKM don’t have to prove that, the lawyer that represents them has given public updates that the release of the monies put aside by the perpetrators in the CMKM Diamonds Inc. sting operation was imminent.

“Mr. Al Hodges has said he represents all 50,000 shareholders who are trapped in this intel operation, trapped because officials from the United States government are to this minute are illegally withholding their money earmarked for them and held in trust after the completion of the DOJ sting operation was complete approximately five years ago.

“The imminent release of these monies set aside in frozen trust has been promised now on twenty or more occasions in the last eight months alone, and for years before that, each time raising the hopes of the shareholders that justice would happen finally, that the known crimes would finally stop being committed against them. Each time the authorities from SEVERAL AGENCIES UP TO THE WHITE HOUSE AND CIA have reneged on their word and broke their judiciary duty to thousands of people in CMKM alone.

“We can provide all time lines going back years to show what has gone on, but what is currently happening is what the COALITION would like to ask the authorities to investigate. The COALITION will present a current time line going back to November 2009 to show the crimes that are currently being committed or alleged to be happening to this day to 50,000 shareholders in CMKM. The time line next will show that every shareholder is owed a huge apology by all the authorities involved for the treatment they received during this nightmare of a process, where authorities all the way to the White House are currently committing serious crimes against CMKM shareholders, but have them covered up completely to this day by all involved. The Canadian government are just sitting idle while they have been completely informed of the situation, one in which they signed deals for Canadian perpetrators to stay out of jail, a deal in which the victims have no justice six years later.

“The shareholders of CMKM Diamonds demand the release of our money set aside for us in the Intel operation ran by the DOJ/RCMP and others, one in which plaintiff Allan Treffry says Al Hodges is still working. We ask that the authorities who are investigating this to step in and do their duty and stop the crimes being currently committed against all shareholders. We ask that if our money is not release according to the law, that a full public investigation be initiated immediately into the evidence about to be entered in this complaint.

“The COALITION now enters evidence for investigation, evidence which can be used by all shareholders to demand an investigation into the crimes being currently committed against them. This evidence clearly shows that CMKM Diamonds Inc and its shareholders were used in a government sting operation and that monies due to them are illegally being withheld, and we ask that these crimes be stopped, thank you.

“TIME LINE OF CURRENT FRAUD BEING COMMITTED AGAINST ALL CMKM DIAMONDS SHAREHOLDERS: June 2006 Mark Faulk finished his book regarding CMKM Diamonds Inc. and was waiting on the indictments of corrupt insiders before he could put his book out. At the same time CMKM Diamonds Inc. finished the largest cert pull in history, proving the largest naked short in history. Al Hodges says in the court testimony on Aug. 2nd in California, attached, that the money set aside in the CMKM Diamonds Inc. sting operation, one in which he has a witness to the deals made, was to be released from frozen trust at this point.

“Shareholders sit for years in agony waiting; most knowing this was a sting, in total darkness, no real information from anyone involved, including their own company. Many shareholders lost their homes in this time, didn’t get much needed operations, and many died, all waiting for justice from the authorities, all treated like the perpetrators instead of the victims.

Starting March 2009, The COALITION files complaints with the RCMP and FBI with absolutely no action, the whole time both organizations know that deals made by officials in both countries are not being adhered to. Public officials in both countries, along with all agencies involved in the sting operation knowing the situation and dealing with thousands of letters of complaint from shareholders, but nobody acts. They all just watch while knowing crimes are happening to prevent the money from being released that is held for the victims in the CMKM sting operation.

November 9th 2009, the COALITION takes matter into their own hands as the authorities are not acting, and files a suit in Canada against the SEC for aiding and abetting the insiders of CMKM Diamonds Inc. sell counterfeit shares. Given the authorities would not admit it was a sting, the COALITION proved they aided and abetted the fraud, and entered that as evidence in our case.

Dec 16th, Al Hodges puts out his first update to all CMKM Diamonds Inc shareholders, informing them money is set aside for them in the sting operation they were used in, including money set aside for them from land sales in Saskatchewan, Canada. These land sales totally hidden from public to this day along with the facts of the sting operation, or even the fact it occurred. Mr. Hodges says he will file a Biven class action suit if the money is not released.

December 30/31, 2009 or there about the government says they will release our money, and the United States Treasury takes the taxes out of the money to be released.

January 4th 2010, the shareholders get an update on a public forum from plaintiff Reece Hamilton. He tells everyone they are finally, after all these years of being hung out to dry by the authorities, about to be paid and closure is imminent…

“January 10th, after the government does not release the money to the shareholders of CMKM Diamonds Inc. like promised, even after they took the taxes out of our money, Mr. Hodges is forced to file the Bivens Class Action, and although he has seven named plaintiffs, says he represents all shareholders in public letters. Here is a portion of a press release put out by the COALITION which represents the essence of the case, and again Mr. Hodges claims he has a witness to the perpetrators making these deals and Mr. Hodges is currently an eye witness to the crimes happening in this case that prevent the conclusion of his Bivens Class Action, one in which all bona fide shareholders are a part of as they all have money held in frozen trust for them: A Bivens Class Action law suit seeking $3.87 trillion in damages was filed on January 10, 2010 against five present and five past Security and Exchange Commission commissioners. A. Clifton Hodges of Hodges and Associates, Pasadena, Ca, filed the suit on behalf of seven named plaintiffs and ‘all others similarly situated’.

“The suit alleges CMKM Diamonds, Inc. was used as a vehicle in a joint sting operation conducted by the SEC, the Department of Justice (DoJ) of the United States, Robert A. Maheu and others. The suit contends between June 1, 2004 and October 28, 2005 ‘a total of 2.25 trillion phantom shares of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. were sold into the public market through legitimate brokers, illegitimate brokers and dealers, market-makers, hedge funds, ex clearing transactions and private transactions.’

“The class action suit further alleges the ‘Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice, with assistance from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), believed and developed evidence that said short sellers were utilizing their activities to illegally launder moneys, wrongfully export moneys, avoid payment of taxes, and to support terrorist operations.’

“The twenty-page complaint states the SEC, DOJ and the DHS, ‘(c)onsented to, facilitated and supported the conferences between Robert A. Maheu and his associates on the one hand and the wrongdoing short sellers on the other, all for the purpose of settling the potential liability of said wrongdoers with consent of the US Government and a representation of no criminal prosecution for such illegal sales.’

“According to Al Hodges filing, between March 2004 and August 2006 a settlement was reached on behalf of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. by Maheu, with assistance from others, and the alleged wrongdoers who had engaged in naked short selling of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. stock and cellar boxing the company. ‘In exchange for a US Government promise of no prosecution for such sales, the wrongdoers each promised to pay negotiated amounts to a frozen trust for disbursal at a later time.’

“The suit contends these monies and other monies resulting from the sale of claims to foreign entities were collected for the benefit of the shareholders of CMKM Diamonds Inc., and are being held in a trust, or held in trust by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation and the United States Treasury. The $3.87 trillion dollar lawsuit states demands for the release of said monies has been ‘repeatedly’ presented to the SEC and ‘agents and employees of the SEC and the DOJ have represented repeatedly that the release of the monies was imminent.’

“The Al Hodges complaint charges, ‘As a result of the Defendant’s misconduct, each of the named plaintiffs and all of those similarly situated, have been denied their Constitutional rights, including, but not limited to, their Fifth Amendment right to be secure in their property, free from taking without just compensation and without due process of law, and have suffered injuries and property loss in excess of Three Trillion Dollars.’

The COALITON prepares for court February 4th in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, in Kelowna, we are asking for a default judgement against the SEC in our case. Our case has changed now, as every case changed when Mr. Hodges Bivens case was not only filed but the release of the funds promised, it appeared to be a given the money would be released at any moment. The fact that the funds were to be released alone corroborates Mr. Hodges claims in his case that the money was there, and it was supposed to be released to the shareholders. I talked to Mr. Hodges via phone on several occasions and Mr. Hodges verified the update by Reece Hamilton, and that the taxes were taken out of the trust fund. He was willing to do a phone teleconference from his office on February 4th and testify to that fact, if the Supreme Court of British Columbia would allow. Unfortunately, the court did not allow that to happen as the judge said that ‘we have decided’ that you will have to re-serve the SEC before going forward. I felt moving forward on my case was moot due to the fact Mr. Hodges was on the verge of having our money released, but on that day I asked the court to release 50,000 shareholders money that was illegally being withheld from them; they denied that request. As I write this it is September the 4th, exactly seven months later with no resolution for the shareholders and crimes being committed against us daily until this is resolved?

From February 4th to February 15th Mr. Hodges tells me personally and the whole shareholders base that follows on various public forums that the delay cannot go past that February 15th date, as that would go past the 90 days they are allowed given the taxes were taken out on December 31st 2009. Mr. Hodges tells the shareholder base that various international crimes will be committed as soon as it goes past that date. During the weeks leading up to February 15th the government agrees to release the money several times and each time reneges on their deals, until it finally reached the date. Many are now breaking international laws with the full knowledge of all involved, they all sit idle while this happens, all committing crimes themselves for aiding this by not performing their judiciary duty and stopping this. The shareholders do several actions to get the word to authorities, but the authorities are fully aware of the situation, they are the ones that need to be investigated. Corroboration of this is in letters attached as evidence.

February 26th letter to Andrew Cuomo, Attorney General of New York, again Mr. Hodges says payment is on the near horizon at this time: Attorney General of the State of New York120 Broadway, 23rd Floor, New York, NY 10001.

“Dear Ms. Brown:

“Thank you for speaking with me earlier today and explaining that Mr. Markowitz was out for the rest of the day. We discussed briefly the nature of my request and you suggested that I forward the appropriate information to your attention via e-mail for Mr. Markowitz’s review on his return Monday, March 1, 2010. The information is as follows:

• I am a California trial attorney with some 40 years experience in State and Federal Court, as well as other jurisdictions.

• In January of this year I filed a Bivens Class Action against the five sitting SEC Commissions and five past SEC Commissioners seeking some 3.87 Trillion Dollars in damages for the taking of property by unconstitutionally withholding consent to distribute such sums as had previously been collected for the benefit of 50,000 + shareholders of CMKM Diamonds, Inc.; a conformed copy of the complaint is attached.

• The SEC Office of General Counsel has agreed to accept service on behalf of the sitting Commissioners; the other commissioners are currently being served.

• The weight of opinion is that this litigation will not be allowed to proceed into the discovery stages and/or to trial; there is mounting evidence that a distribution of funds to the shareholders is on the near horizon.

• I am advised that a portion of trust funds previously ear-marked for distribution to support the U.S. Domestic Settlement Fund Program currently in process were distributed to the United States Treasury facility in New York City on December 31, 2009 through and with the assistance of the New York Federal Reserve Bank in New York City.

• I am advised that these trust funds totaled 4.2 Trillion Dollars and were paid into the U.S. Treasury as and for taxes due to be paid from the trust(s) upon distribution of the trust assets.

• I am further advised that pursuant to Federal Banking Regulations, New York State Banking Regulations, and the Martin Act, inter alia, the transferred funds could be held without return for a maximum period of time under any circumstances for forty-five days or until midnight February 14, 2010.

• I am further advised that the U.S. Treasury has not remitted these funds, is still possessed of these funds and more importantly the trust(s) assets have not been distributed.

• The above circumstances, upon proof, demonstrate serious criminal violations of the statutes referred to above.

• I represent, at least as the Class Counsel, a number of New York residents who are beneficiaries of these trust(s) and are among the 50,000 + shareholders. I know many of these people on a personal basis in addition to being their counsel of record and can attest to their severe and continuing damage suffered and being suffered as a result of the non-distribution and non-receipt of the afore mentioned trust assets; some of them are also anxious to visit you in person and describe their continuing outrage. Demand is hereby made that your office initiate, at the earliest possible time, an investigation into the criminal activities of those persons within your jurisdiction whom have contributed to and otherwise facilitated these criminal acts. I would be happy to discuss these facts with you at your early convenience. Please feel free to contact me directly at: (626) 564-9797. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter.

1--March 30th, no resolution to the situation despite the fact numerous crimes are occurring daily, no resolution but each week passes with hope given that this may end and authorities may finally do their duties. March 30th Mr. Hodges gives an interview to the Manhattan Examiner, in the article he claims he has an eye witness to the deals made by Robert Maheu, authorities from several agencies, and the perpetrators. Quotes from the article show that Mr. Hodges again feels the shareholders money is about to be released as we speak, it again proved to be false, and again shareholders were given false hope our government would actually follow the law: ‘They [the government] used the shareholders without their consent to perform this ‘sting operation’ for National Security interests, and it wouldn’t have worked the way it worked if they had disclosed it,’ he continued. ‘On the other hand, it isn’t right to bury a company and put them out of business for the purpose of trapping people who are using the company to cheat the government, to line their own pockets, and to fund their operations against the United States.’ As noted above in complaint paragraph 34, and per Hodges, a deal was eventually reached with the aforementioned criminals; they paid the government restitution for documented illegal actions, and in turn, were offered immunity from prosecution. ‘Rob Maheu had all these people in a big room in Las Vegas, and made [an] offer to them,’ he said. ‘Every person, organization and representative in that room stepped up, and either transferred money while they were there, or agreed to transfer money upon some further schedule’ to avoid indictment. Hodges also said, ‘I have a witness who was there, who saw it, and part of the 2.25 trillion phantom shares is documented by that person’s observations of how many shares were represented in that room.’ HOW MUCH MONEY DID THE FEDS REALLY COLLECT FOR RESTITUTION? ‘People are going to laugh and titter about the amount of money that is being claimed, but understand the context of the lawsuit,’ he said, before concluding, ‘we are not asking the government to pay us $3.87 trillion, what we’re asking is for them to release the funds that have been collected for us.’ Thus, the implication is that this sum also incorporates substantial punitive damages. In the end, Hodges believes the U.S. government is going to settle the case before it actually moves to trial. On this possibility, he said, ‘I think it’s in the process of happening as we speak.’

2--April 27th update by by Al Hodges to all shareholders, again Mr. Hodges feels the money will be in the Trustee’s hands by week’s end, again this did not happen.

3--Our Status – We are literally on the thresh-hold. This means that the ‘work’ remaining to be finished will not consume more hours than can be accomplished within one day. We have been at this point now for more than a few weeks.

4--The Delay – Although I could write a book about what’s been going on behind the scenes to cause this additional delay, I’ll try to give you the condensed version: First – Please be aware and understand that there is an economic war raging in the background. Second – The naked corruption that is endemic in D.C. is more than most can comprehend; it is clear that these miscreants have no regard for the US Constitution, Federal Laws and Regulations, nor even any sense of simple morality. They are convinced that they are above any constraint that might apply to lesser mortals and that no enforcement activity will ever successfully address them. I hasten to add that such opinions are not universal; having said that, it is more widespread than not. Third – These miscreants are, in effect, fighting for their lives – at least that part of their lives that establishes an environment in which they can continue to lie, cheat, steal, and mortgage your progeny’s lives, all for their personal gain. Accordingly, they will fight until the doors are all closed by a power that they cannot subvert. That fight continues as I prepare this interim update. Fourth – The good news is, we are winning the battle. The circle within which these bad apples can operate draws inexorably smaller with each attempt to bribe, suborn and otherwise corrupt the system, and the people within it. By way of example, I was advised that over the weekend one State Department person, 10 bankers and 18 Federal Reserve people were arrested and dealt with. Fifth – By what date will we have Economic Receipt, you ask. We will have it when this initial battle phase comes to a successful conclusion. That will be in the very near future in my opinion; the current schedule based on advice I received this afternoon is that it should all be finished, with funds in the Trustee’s hands, by week’s end.

5--May 20th 2010, Mr. Hodges to President Obama, Mr. Hodges alleges that settlement monies set aside in the sting operation and money set aside from the sale of land for the benefit of the shareholders of CMKM are now part of the Global Settlement causing further delays in distribution, something in itself that needs to be investigated. He also claims the conclusion of the transfers of Global Settlement monies should have taken place over the last two months and that his paymaster is ready at this moment to finish up that work…

6--August 2nd hearing in California where Al Hodges responds to the defendants (SEC commissioners past and present) motion to dismiss, the defendants were represented by DOJ lawyer Keith Staub, the same DOJ that should be protecting the shareholders of CMKM and enforcing the deals they made years ago: AH: Good Afternoon your Honor, A. Clifton Hodges on behalf of the plaintiffs, two of whom are in the courtroom today, Mr. Hamilton and Mr. _____________

Judge: Good afternoon, welcome.

SEC; Good afternoon your Honor, this is U.S. Attorney Keith Stavron (??) on behalf of the Federal defense.

Judge: Good afternoon Have you had a chance to review the tentative ??

Both say yes your honor

Judge: Mr. Hodges I think I would like to hear from you first please

AH: your Honor, first of all let me concede the point raised in your tentative that this is not your usual Bivens case. That is clear for everyone I think. As a house keeping matter on page one there is a typographical error, in the middle paragraph the Administrative Law Judge’s finding was in 2005 not in 2010.

Judge: Thank you.

AH: Having said that, let me refer you to the second issue raised by the government first. It asks the question whether or not there are property rights at issue in this case. And very simply what we have alleged is , let me back up a second. We have alleged a scheme, in effect a sting operation, judged from the outside not from the inside. Basically the sting operation was an operation put into effect through the Office of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice, and the SEC Commissioners.

What we have alleged is that the SEC Commissioners as opposed to the Agency itself, coordinated with these other institutions and at their request and in concert with them began a program, whereby, this company was raided. The SEC Commission was fully aware, at all times, of the amount of naked shorting going on in this company.

The then Chairman of the commission has been quoted on several occasions as saying this was the most heavily naked shorted company in the history of the world. As we have alleged in our complaint one day, which I believe was in April 2005, some more than 90 billion shares of this company were traded in one day. I have testimony from, which is not alluded to in our current complaint, but I can provide testimony from registered NSASDA companies, that were in business at this time, who report that they were told ‘it’s free money’. You can sell as many shares as you can find buyers for and put all of the money in your pocket. You don’t ever have to buy the share.

They were on a no borrow list to begin with, at that point in time, which was in 2005 primarily. And if you were going to borrow shares as a legitimate broker in that point in time, they had a $2.50 requirement for borrowing. You can imagine with some, I think they averaged during that time 17 billion shares a day being sold, this is an enormous amount of money for people to be borrowing shares to be sold into the market. They were being sold for nothing, that is how they drove this company into the ground.

They did it because there was evidence by the government, and by others, associated both directly and indirectly with the government, that this money was being sent offshore. It was being accumulated by hedge funds offshore, it was being sent to Iraq, it was being sent to Iran, it was being sent to Afghanistan, it was being sent to Hezbollah, this was one of the means in which these terrorist organizations were utilizing them to fund their operations.

Having said that, I recognized when I prepared this complaint at the time the company was being de-listed, and the time this original agreement was made, we did not have a basis to sue the SEC, the SEC commissioners, or anybody else. Because in fact, as the Court correctly points out, in regard to (quoted a case) it said the shareholders don’t have a right, they don’t have a property interest. If they did not have that right at the time the agreement was made, at the time the original ultra _______ criminal acts by these Commissioners took place.

However, what this complaint speaks to is at quite a later date after the company was de-listed in October of 2005, and they stipulated to that delisting, Then we go forward and what immediately happened was a Task Force, including one primary and past board of director members, Mr. Bob Mahue, who is no longer with us unfortunately, became the head of that Task Force. His appointed duties, and the Task Force appointed duties, were to have the shareholders pull copies of their shares, pull certificates for every share that was legitimately then owned because it had been bought and paid for, and based upon that share certificate pull, then turn around and liquidate the company.

At the time the company decided it was going to liquidate itself and distribute its remaining assets to its shareholders the property rights attached to each of the shareholders because at that point in time, this was in early 2006, they had a right to believe that what was in their future was a distribution, a prorate per share distribution of the assets that the company then owned. The company then owned all of these monies that had been accumulated and put into trusts. The company also owned shares of stock in a company called Entourage and they had other assets. They did not have any substantial liabilities.

So the share holders, from that point forward, had a property right that is protectable under the Constitution. It is that claim that we are basing our complaint. Having said that, once we get past the property rights issue, I certainly understand the Courts concern and I have reviewed my complaint, about, perhaps the use of some in artful language when I referred to the SEC rather than specifying that it was the SEC commissioners that we are aiming this at.

The reason we are aiming only at the SEC commissioners is because under the statutory scheme that was set up after the Great Depression, the SEC commission and commissioners individually have the sole and exclusive right to make the decisions. For example with this firm, when this company was de-listed in October of 2005, it was pursuant to an Administrative Law Hearing that took place here in Los Angeles, a full day down in Federal Court, that I attended.

The Administrative Law Judge then rendered a tentative decision. It was her decision but it was tentative in the sense that it had no power and had no effect. The only time that it became effective was when the company became de-listed on October 24th or 25th of that year when the Commission met and together agreed that this company should be de-listed.

They are the only people who have the power to make these kinds of decisions. They are the people who spoke to the other governmental agencies and to the people representing, at least ostensibly the company at that point in time, with this agreement to utilize this company without knowledge to the shareholders as part of a sting operation to trap all of these hedge fund people. That started way back in 2004.

But it was those commissioners acting in an improper and ___________ and probably criminal way because their mandate under the law is to protect the shareholders. They were doing exactly the opposite. They were entering into an agreement they knew way going to damage he shareholders, it was going to drive this company out of business, which it did, and without notice in a big secret. It was only those commissioners who took that action that we are aiming this complaint at.

We have named the commissioners that have sat since that time because it is our position that having denied these people payment these commissioners have signed on ratifying the acts of their fellow criminals or miscreants, at least, and at the end of the day refuse to release this money. Money that has been collected. We are not suing the SEC, we aren’t suing the government.

Judge: who, in your analysis, is the trustee of the funds? Who holds the funds?

AH: There are actually several trustees who hold the funds, one of whom is currently the DTCC. I only say that because I know the funds are on deposit with the DTCC.

Judge: OK spin that out for me.

AH: The deposit for a trust, clearing corporation, they are the clearing house for all the financial transactions basically that they placed in __________

Judge: Privately or publicly?

AH: They are a private company but they act a public one.

Judge: As opposed to governmental

AH: It is not a governmental agency in the same sense that the Federal Reserve Banks are not government.

Judge: What document governs the terms under which they hold those funds?

AH: A trust agreement.

Judge: Between?

AH: Between the people who provisionally set this up

Judge: Who are?

AH: One of whom was Bob Mahue.

Judge: As an employee of the SEC?

AH: Not as an employee of the SEC in any sense of the word, he was at one time on the Board of Directors of the company CMKX Diamonds.

Judge: right

AH: He never acted on behalf of the SEC.

Judge: What control does the sec have over this trust fund?

AH: They don’t have any direct control over the trust fund. The agreement, however, that was originally entered into, as I understand the testimony of my, what I have been able to accumulate without the opportunity to do actual discovery, my understanding is that Bob Mahue and several of his associates entered into a deal first with the Department of Justice, they got the SEC on board through the commissioners by talking to several of them. Primarily Christopher Cox.

Judge: Who is a defendant, a named defendant who used to be the Chairman?

AH: The essence of the agreement they made was that in order to make this sting effective the company would go and pump its stock, which it did, the government would assist in that operation, which it did

Judge: How?

AH: There is evidence that they paid for some of the expenses associated with a car, a drag racing car that had CMKX painted on the outside of it that was being very publicly bandied about the internet and raced in various jurisdictions. One of their ex-employees a gentleman named Roger Glenn, an attorney, he used to be an attorney in New York with the law firm _______________ signed on to increase the stock at the request of the SEC, I am told. He came on to or into CMKX in 2004.

When he arrived there the number of authorized shares for the company some where of 100 or 200 billion, I forget exactly what, when he left some nine or ten months later the number of authorized shares had illegally and improperly, under every law that I am aware of at least, had been raised to 800 billion shares. And this company eventually sold some 700 billion shares of stock. And there is over that many outstanding ____________, 703 billion plus.

Judge: Why isn’t your client against the clearinghouse acting as trustee for these funds?

AH: Because that would be like suing the escrow company.

Judge: Yeah but the escrow company has the funds.

AH: As I started to say, here is the simple answer, your Honor, as I started to say a few minutes ago and I probably did not finish. The original agreement, there was a war that ensued after the sting got under operation because what the sting always contemplated was that Mr. Maheu would collect all of these bad doers, the hedge fund people and people like T.D. Waterhouse and all the other stock brokerage houses around who were naked shorting this company, collect them all in a big room and offer them a deal for two reasons.

First of all to collect money for CMKX for what had been done to them. And second of all to teach these people a lesson that there were people out there watching what was going on. Hopefully that would head them off from continuing in such illicit and illegal and improper behavior. That was in fact done and I have a witness that was there when it was done.

They had a room about three times the size of your courtroom in which they had representative from all of these brokerages from all over the world. They watched a video presentation, because Mr. Mahue, as the court may be aware, was at one time closely associated with the CIA, Howard Hughes and all kinds of other people.

Judge: I was going to ask you whether that was the same Bob Maheu.

AH: It is indeed the same one, a gentleman I happened to make acquaintances with in the 70’s to my good fortune. At any rate all of these people were in this room and were shown a video and a slide presentation of all of the evidence of their wrongdoing and they were offered an opportunity to either step up and sign away your money and pay a reasonable amount for each transaction you did illegally and improperly or go walk out of here and get prosecuted and go to jail because what you did was criminal.

Every single person in that room stepped up and made a deal. After that time there became a big conflict between the SEC commissioners and the other governmental entities who were supporting the SEC commissioners about who was going to have the right to release this money to the shareholders and when. My understanding is that it went on for some number of months but ultimately the SEC commissioners prevailed and convinced Mr. Maheu and his associates that it had to be their decision because only they and the rest of the government could determine when this ting had fulfilled its function.

That was the basis on which he gave them the power to make this decision about when the money is to be released. It is my understanding that every trust that is currently being held for release of this money is being held by a person who is sworn to observe that requirement. That the SEC, the US government whoever ____ this payment, goes first. Since my information is that was the SEC commissioners that have this power, this is why they are the defendants in this case.

Judge: Let’s return to your Bivens theory, it is taking a headpoint

AH: this money was supposed to have been released within a year of the time the company was originally de-listed in October of 2005. This is now almost October of 2010, some 4 years past that time. It is taking only because they refuse, not withstanding information they have continued to give to ____________, they continue to refuse to release this money. If they don’t release they money then it is a taking. Because they are preventing what is rightfully ours for us to receive. That is why it is a taking.

Judge: Thank You

AH: You are welcome

Judge: Mr. Saton (?)

SEC: Thank you your Honor. I have to admit most of what I just heard I heard for the first time because most of it wasn’t in the claim.

Judge: I found it very educational.

SEC: Indeed. True or not I don’t know but we are here to discuss what is in the complaint today. We’re not here to give oral argument and give testimony to facts no one has any idea about, certainly not myself. We are here to talk about what is in the complaint, whether it was properly pled under rule 8, the ___decision and _________. As this Court pointed out in its tentative it is not properly pled.

Judge: Yeah I am satisfied with that in the tentative. The case would be for the plaintiff to dismiss the plead to re-plead. I guess what I am really interested in is whether this is an appearance claim given the nature of the asset raid whether sovereign immunity applies.

SEC: Well I suppose they can sue a government official under Bivens for any violation of civil rights whether it has to do with money or not. I don’t know any distinguishing facts in this case that would prevent them from being sued individually under Bivens if there are sufficient facts.

Judge: Well if you concede in theory that a Constitution violation of the taking clause could be asserted against an individual an individual government worker.

SEC: Well I haven’t researched that so I don’t know the answer to that specifically. We asserted on our brief the original invest property because pursuant to the complaint the SEC had the discretion to release funds, if in fact there are these funds in existence, that discretion alone, under the case law that we cited suggests that they don’t have the property rights. But the answer to your question is I don’t know.

Judge: Well there are two questions I guess. One is there a property right and is the contingent asset, if you will, subject to distribution to the plaintiffs at the will of the commission. But there is a separate issue is whether the nature of the relief sought here is such that it can only be asserted against the commissioners in their official capacity.

SEC: Well, I don’t think the government has a way of stopping the release in official capacity or in any way.

Judge: Well I understand that, the issue is, is there some manner which these crimes could be asserted against the individual defendants in their individual capacities or is the relief sought by definition relief that can only be sought in their official capacity in which case there can be no private claim they would be entitled to sovereign immunity in their official capacity

SEC: That may be the case, I don’t know the answer to that. I think the court is inclined to be consistent with its tentative as far as the pleading requirements. I think the plaintiffs have an opportunity to re-plead to amend the complaint. We will certainly deal with the issue that the Court raised on further briefing, I imagine there will be an additional motion to dismiss in the future. But that being said clearly these are high level government officials, they don’t deserve to be sued and discovery taken of them. I am not specific, obligations have been made by some and none have been made to a distant point.

I hear some issues were addressed during oral argument that I didn’t see in the complaint, even assuming those are true there is nothing specific to these SEC commissioners other than the fact that they some how have the sole discretion to make every single decision at the SEC. I don’t buy that.

Judge: Mr. S—- it might be easier to assess whether claims can be asserted against the commissioners as individuals if we have a complaint that complies with __________.

SEC: That may be true, yes. If it’s in a fact complied and fitting the requirements of _________ and it can pass qualified immunity which also remains in the court obviously doesn’t need to address right now. But if and when the Court decides it’s been properly pled then I think qualified immunity should be addressed.

Judge: Well what I am going to do is dismiss with ________ to re-plead for failure to meet the Rule 8 requirements. Again not to dismiss the claims against them in their official capacity as a matter of sovereign immunity and leave the other issues until we have pleading that passes muster.

AH: Agree you Honor.

SEC: I would only ask you honor the government have 30 days to respond and to ________ people. Thank you.

Judge: Mr. Hodges

AH: I certainly recognize, your Honor, the need to be more specific in the complaint and I appreciate the Courts willingness to give us the opportunity if that is the Courts

Judge: I understand you want

AH: 45 days with the

Judge: any objections?

SEC: None your Honor

Judge: You have 30 days to respond by answering in a motion

AH: That is fine your Honor

Judge: OK we will modify the tentative accordingly.”

Robert A. Maheu cited above may be a present or former employee of the CIA. Hodges and Associates have filed lawsuits against different parties and have written numerous letters to Ben Bernanke at the Fed, President Obama, the Queen of the UK, the British Prime Minister, various officials in the US, etc trying to obtain the monies due CMKX and Cottrell. All efforts so far have been met by US stonewalling and non cooperation. Here is one letter from Hodges to Obama:

“May 27, 2010

Via Facsimile Only: (202) 456 2461

Honorable Barack Obama

President of the United States of America

White House

Washington, DC

In re: World Global Settlements

Dear Mr President

I write to you again this afternoon in furtherance of my previous recent correspondence regarding prompt dissemination of the World Global Settlements.

As I have previously stated, I represent some 50,000 shareholders who are to be paid a settlement which consist mainly of monies collected from banks, brokerages, hedge fund corporations, market makers, the Depository Trust Corporation/Federal Reserve, and various billionaire ‘naked-shorter’ individuals, as well as some monies due from the SEC for damages. I have also been involved in the representation of other payees awaiting this distribution and have, in such capacity, been in direct communication with the UK Royal Monarch.

I am currently advised and understand the following:

• A portion of the World Global Settlement funds have been collected and are presently held in the custody of the Bank of America in Richmond, VA.

• Said funds are sufficient to cover all disbursements to be made by the authority of the Paymaster who has now spent more than eight weeks over the past three months, in Richmond, for the purpose of concluding these transfers.

• The Paymaster authority has, at the direction of the Pentagon, London, et al., been present in the Bank in Richmond every day this week to complete the transfers.

• This morning he was advised by ‘both sides’ that each desired this matter to be concluded as soon as possible and that he should be available to enter the bank to consummate the transfers.

• AS OF 6:00 P, EDT, THE PAYMASTER AUTHORITY PERSONALLY ADVISED ME THAT YOU PERSONALLY, MR PRESIDENT, WANTED AND HAD DIRECTED THAT THESE FUNDS BE HELD THROUGHOUT THE COMING HOLIDAY WEEKEND.

• I have previously been advised that you had given specific written authorization of these transfers and confirmed the same verbally just this week.

Mr President, I sincerely hope that my information is incorrect; because, as I am certain you are aware, your personal involvement in delaying this distribution is an ultra vires action which exposes you to personal liability for the sums involved and for accruing interest thereon. I would certainly not want to see you personally involved in the future dénouement of this matter.

As I have previously advised in my communications to you, only your direct intervention will be efficacious in bringing this matter to conclusion.

Mr President, I implore you to facilitate conclusion of this matter forthwith. There is simply no legal basis for any further delay. Please act consonantly with your previous statements and promises.

I would very much appreciate your written confirmation that you will do so immediately; accordingly, I will withhold public distribution of this correspondence until 8:00 pm EDT today.

Sincerely,

Hodges and Associates

[Signed]: A. Clifton Hodges”

More About the purposes of the $27.5 trillion, now $60-$70 trillion Fund

What is important here from the above is that attorney Hodges and his clients repeatedly charge that the monies involved in the Global Securities Fund/Global Settlement Fund were used in investment activities, short selling and to manipulate and control the various world financial markets for the benefit of some secret unidentified party or parties (and since British Lord Jacob Rothschild supervises these funds, it’s not hard to put two and two together and see who has been benefiting from these funds).

Many of us have known for ages that the CIA is exempt from US law and that none of their work can become an issue in US courts (that’s why, since at least 1961, under Kennedy, the CIA become Murder Incorporated (to quote Lyndon Johnson). We don’t know and can’t find out how many people the CIA has assassinated over the years. The Agency made at least 26 attempts on the life of Castro (after 26 attempts to kill him, it is no wonder that Castro hates the US). It is also known by many persons that the CIA has been a key agency in the world drug trade for years. Allegedly, the CIA handles drugs for payoffs from the world ruling drug masters. Ostensibly, the case can be made that the CIA works the drug trade for additional income to supplement its activities beyond black ops appropriations from the Congress and other secret funding from the US Executive branch.

With so many illegal activities going on, it is entirely plausible that the CIA has been heavily involved in the manipulation and control of the world financial markets to supposedly benefit the Federal Reserve Bank and US Treasury (though secretly, we can bank on it that CIA involvement in the markets is really to benefit the secret plutocratic rulers of the US—namely the Rothschild Cabal of bankers).

So while the case can be made that the World Security Fund actively funded intelligence activities, revolutions, assassinations, spying, sabotage, unrest in enemy nations, etc on behalf of its US-Rothschild masters, it is manifestly clear that the Agency has been involved in the manipulation of the global financial markets. From the beginning, this fund has been employed under the supervision of Lord Jacob Rothschild of Britain. Thus, we can be sure that the fund works for the Rothschild Cabal of bankers. There is no other way an intelligent person can believe it (true, blind idiots supporting the status quo of Rothschild rule can go into a trance and start mumbling about US democracy versus the alleged evils of Russia, China, Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, etc).

Since Ronald Reagan first established the Working Group for Financial Stability in 1988 (the Plunge Protection Team), it is entirely plausible that the use of the CIA in manipulating financial markets was clearly a part of the program (it is now admitted that the CIA manipulated the currency markets to bring the Russian Ruble down on more than one occasion).

Interestingly, the fact is that the Rothschild effort to manipulate and control the worldwide financial markets surfaced in a report from the Russian internet site Engforum.pravda.ru in early Oct 2010 in a story on Windsor syndicate in London using Barclays Bank (UK) for scam trades.

This report said: “More from the Casper intel group (US): On Saturday 3rd April 2010, the Elizabeth Windsor (Queen Elizabeth II of England) syndicate and The London Crown Temple delivered executive documents by hand to Barclays Bank (UK) to use the US Prosperity Funds as collateral for under-the-radar derivatives trading in London. Delivery of the Prosperity Funds in the US was deliberately delayed to enable this élite dealing.”

It is not clear to me what the Prosperity Fund is doing (the name sounds like something along the lines of the Plunge Protection Team), but we can bank on it that Britain is involved in manipulating the global financial markets as well as other Rothschild controlled nations. So we have the British government, the US Plunge Protection Team, the US CIA (thru its secret funding of operations like the World Securities Fund), the large private banks controlled by the Rothschild Cabal), and secret insiders like George Soros all busy working together to manipulate and control the world financial markets for their personal gains.

For those persons wondering how the $27.5 trillion invested years ago has turned into some $60 to $70 trillion today, it’s not hard to see how it happened. Again, it appears that only an idiot can sit back and think that all of the works of Britain, the US, the CIA, the Rothschild Cabal of bankers, etc are being done for the benefit of the American, British and other peoples of the world. No, this pap and crap can be sold to idiot people who believe in the tooth fairy or who are in the market to buy a bridge in Brooklyn but I submit intelligent people are going to back off and say “no way.”

Some Questions and the Bottom Line

At this point there must be a ton of questions—which I certainly can’t answer. In fact, I can’t even verify the existence of this fund and the above statements beyond their presence in the various citations and numerous internet references. I do believe that Hodges and Associates are fully committed and that the cited law suits have taken place. The World Court writ of execution and lien is very plausible.

I think the various letters sent to Obama, Bernanke, etc all were sent by Hodges. I further believe that this gang at the Fed and with the US government would do as reported—ignore the requests and do as they please with the full assurance that they are above the law and that nobody can do anything to them since they control the powers of government. This is called the arrogance of power.

So we must logically ask—is the US Federal Reserve Bank/US government holding in some secret account (in the US or off shore) some $47 trillion belonging to the Chinese, $6.2 trillion belonging to Michael Cottrell, $4.5 trillion belonging to Leo Wanta and/or $3.87 trillion belonging to the CMKX Corp? Is some part of these funds being used to pump up the US dollar and US debt on occasion; suppress gold, silver and commodities; and manipulate the markets for the Rothschild Cabal? Well, I don’t know but I do know that where there’s smoke there’s fire.

In this vein, is it not entirely plausible that the US Treasury/Federal Reserve Bank could be holding trillions of dollars legally belonging to other parties—like the Chinese (and why the United States owes China some $47 trillion could be irrelevant at this point in time). If a settlement day ever arrives, what will this reality mean for the US dollar and the future of the US government and the American people?

The other major issue involved is plainly the apparent evidence that the US has been involved along with the Fed, the British, many/most/all agencies of the US government, various central banks, etc in the manipulation and control of the global financial markets for quite some time. Since Lord Jacob Rothschild of Britain is the master of this operation we can be sure that there is a Rothschild Cabal banker conspiracy and collusion of the parties at the top to rip off worldwide investors in the global financial markets.

____________________________________________________________________

Back issues of the Goldsmiths, by the editor of the Analysis of News, can be accessed from a Google or Yahoo search engine by typing in “R. D. Bradshaw” Goldsmiths. Several hundred web sites can be found with the back issues and with translations to Spanish, Italian, German, Dutch, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Indonesian, Serbian, and other foreign languages. Finally, the “Archives-Goldsmiths” of this website (www.analysis-news.com ) has all of the Goldsmith articles issued to date.

Besides the revelations contained in the Goldsmiths’ articles, the work of the plutocratic financial market manipulators to conspiratorially manipulate and control the financial markets (to make more profits and install a world government under their management) is also addressed at length in the periodic analysis of the news and in other articles produced at www.analysis-news.com. This website has an article of interest to any person interested in understanding the market Manipulators. It is the Hidden Secret of the Manipulators, why they succeed and how to follow their manipulations.

Readers of the above articles are invited to visit www.analysis-news.com and become a subscriber to regularly read some of the material from the world of information which will further reveal how extensive the manipulation, control and dishonesty realities are in the financial, currency and commodity markets, not only in the US but indeed around the world. To go to the Home Page of this web site, click here: www.analysis-news.com.

ObamaCare court report: Two thumbs up!

Liberty Counsel Mathew Staver, Founder and Chairman

10/26/2010

Juan,

On Friday, just after appearing in Federal District Court, I recorded an important audio briefing for Liberty Counsel team members about our court showdown over ObamaCare. I was guardedly optimistic about our performance then, but after a few days' reflection, I realize it went better than we could have expected.

Frankly, the Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys did not successfully justify mandatory participation in this massive takeover of our healthcare system. In fact, we now feel they did a relatively poor job of arguing that our lawsuit should be dismissed.

My staff tells me that many Liberty Counsel team members still have not had the opportunity to hear the message I recorded.

Because this is an exclusive briefing for our grassroots team, we will be removing this audio at midnight on Wednesday. That means this is your last opportunity to hear this important audio update, recorded shortly after leaving the courtroom where I argued that the DOJ's motion to dismiss our lawsuit should be denied.

Please take a minute to listen to this special message to learn more about what happened inside the courtroom on Friday:

If ObamaCare is allowed to stand and the government can force you and me to buy a product, it will place the government in a position of unlimited power. Where will it end? Exposing the unconstitutional nature of this blatant power grab is a key element of our case.

In my opinion, and that of many observers who attended the hearing, Liberty Counsel's legal team was far better prepared than the lawyers from the DOJ. Based on the strength of our case and the thoroughness of our preparation, I believe we will win at this level and will ultimately prevail at higher levels, as well.

But the fact is, we simply cannot win battles like this - especially when taking on the federal government and President Obama's prized "show case" legislation - without the continued, faithful support of friends like you.

In fact, we expect Obama's DOJ to use every available resource against us. Of course, our adversaries have virtually unlimited human resources and a budget of over $26 billion per year.

As we prepare for the next phase of this case, will you please consider making a tax-deductible gift to help Liberty Counsel in this and other crucial legal battles? Go here:

Our forefathers would be appalled that the federal government is exercising a new form of tyranny through the unconstitutional mandate at the heart of ObamaCare. Friday's hearing has only increased my determination to do everything in our power to stop ObamaCare from being fully implemented!

But how will we defeat ObamaCare in court when the government has virtually unlimited resources to commit to this case?

By standing firmly on the Constitution... with hundreds if not thousands of hours of legal preparation... and with the faithful partnership of friends like you.

Of course, I would be remiss not to mention the crucial role of prayer as we labor together to defend true liberty in our land. THANK YOU so much for your faithful support - in prayer, by your actions and through your gifts. May God richly bless you!

Mathew Staver, Founder and Chairman Liberty Counsel

P.S. The post-hearing briefing on our ObamaCare case will be available to you until midnight Eastern Time on Wednesday. Please be sure to listen to my exclusive audio message to find out why I believe we are on a winning path. Also, please consider making a tax-deductible gift to Liberty Counsel so we can continue our progress in defeating the ObamaCare legislation in court! Again, thank you and may God bless you!

Christopher Story's Work Goes On

A Tribute

by Ashley Mote

1 August 2010

Only a day or so ago I finally heard that my distinguished friend Christopher Story died on 14th July 2010 (Bastille Day – the symbolism of which would not have been lost on him). He apparently suffered liver failure.

He had been complaining of not feeling well for some months, had recently skipped a trip to the USA and had lost a good deal of weight since Christmas. It is entirely possible his death was from natural causes.

The world is a much poorer place for his passing. I mourn his loss as I would mourn the loss of a brother. He was the staunchest champion of all that was honest and upright in life, a courageous investigative journalist, an indefatigable writer, an audacious publisher, and a powerful intellect.

I have lost a true friend whose company and integrity I valued beyond words. His loss is truly devastating.

Over the last decade or so, ever since I became actively involved in European politics, I have met and had dealings with an extraordinary number of extraordinary people. To be frank, some I loathed.

But the company of many others was hugely stimulating, greatly valued, and much enjoyed. Christopher Story was right at the top of that list.

I first met Christopher at a Bruges Group meeting in the days when they were held on the top floor of a cramped London pub. We immediately sensed a mutual liking for each other and met regular from that time on. We had been due to meet for lunch a few days hence.

Far more important than our meetings, however, was the rapid development of our continuous exchange of information by emails, telephone and snail mail – which we quickly found to be by far the safest means of communication. Both of us knew our lines were tapped. Sometimes we deliberately traded information just to let whoever was listening know what we knew! Or to mislead…!

Christopher Story had the energy of a man half his age. He regularly wrote more words in a day than I might write in a week or more. His range of knowledge and experience of the global financial markets and – much more importantly - the power broking that went on behind it, was utterly breathtaking at times. His regular newsletters – International Currency Review, Economic Intelligence Review, Global Analyst, Soviet Analyst, Arab-Asian Affairs, Eastern Europe Analyst, World Reports, and several other occasional titles – to say nothing of his many books based of these newsletters, might have been the work of ten men.

But Christopher researched, wrote, designed, printed and distributed every one of them himself, with the aid of a handful of others whom he knew could be trusted. He was a one-man, self-appointed, self-financing, international investigation agency which specialised in researching the deployment and accountability of public money, the manipulation of currencies, and power laundering by the world’s ruling elites.

This work took him into some of the most dangerous places on earth – not just geographically, but intellectually as well. As a result he made many powerful enemies. They all knew that when he found a racketeering spade, whoever it was, he would call him a bloody shovel, and publish that news to the whole world – or at least to those willing to listen. For most of the world’s media, his conclusions and commentaries were far too hot for them to handle – hence the self-publication.

Much of Christopher’s best investigative work was done in the USA, where he had highly valued internal sources of information within the Federal Reserve Bank, the CIA, and within the financial and political communities as a whole. At times, he became personally and dangerously embroiled in some of the financial trails he was following, on occasion at his consideration personal risk. He was a truly brave man.

The common thread running through all Christopher Story did could be encapsulated in a single phrase – the misuse of power! Indeed it was he who sparked one of my own more memorable epithets – ‘those attracted to power are the least suitable to wield it’.

One of my earliest meetings with Christopher was in Oxford, near his home, when he took the greatest pleasure in showing me around his old college. He was immensely proud of having graduated at Oxford University, and rightly so. It had instilled or reinforced that innate and shining honesty that distinguished all he did.

In later years we more usually met in Brussels, when he came to visit the European Parliament for a day or two. Often these trips were carefully timed to coincide with meetings of the Budget Control Committee, on which I had a seat, and when I planned to raise issues briefed by him beforehand. Sometimes he admitted later to having the greatest difficulty sitting at the back, in the public gallery, trying hard to suppress his urge to intervene.

Perhaps the best and by far the most famous question I ever raised in the European Parliament was based entirely on a briefing by Christopher Story. It concerned the Global Security Fund. Like all speeches in a plenary session it was recorded on videotape and can now be found on literally scores of websites around the world. Even today, almost five years later, new postings of that one-minute speech are regularly uncovered by the Google search-engine.

This was what I said :

“Mr President, I wish to draw your attention to the Global Security Fund, set up in the early 1990s under the auspices of Jacob Rothschild. This is a Brussels-based fund and it is no ordinary fund: it does not trade, it is not listed and it has a totally different purpose. It is being used for geopolitical engineering purposes, apparently under the guidance of the intelligence services. I have previously asked about the alleged involvement of the European Union’s own intelligence resources in the management of slush funds in offshore accounts, and I still await a reply. To that question I now add another: what are the European Union’s connections to the Global Security Fund and what relationship does it have with European Union institutions?”

At the time, with the House almost empty as usual, I got no reply. Later I asked a near-identical written question, the answer to which understandably told us precisely nothing. After all, how could Brussels’ elite bureaucrats admit that they had a hand in a gigantic illegal trust fund? It was estimated by undercover overseas financial investigators at 65 trillion dollars, we knew it had been set-up for ‘Illuminati rainy days’ and when needed in a crunch situation for bribery, state-inspired black operations and activities to divert attention from the world’s banking and political mafia.

Christopher’s original briefing also told me that, “while the fund is cloaked in secrecy” it was made possible by the US Federal Reserve banking system. However I decided, in the context of the EU, not to follow up that potential second line of attack.

No wonder there is still so much interest in that original question. It was possibly the first occasion anyone had mentioned the existence of the Global Security Fund in any public arena, anywhere.

It would be an entirely appropriate and well-deserved tribute to Christopher Story’s life’s work if, one day, the truth finally emerges about the Global Security Fund and those responsible for the monumental misuse of public funds are finally exposed and brought to book.

Meanwhile, I shall continue to mourn the loss of a true friend, and there is no greater tribute I can pay Christopher Story than describing him thus.___

Two of Many Reactions to the Tribute Above

Mr. Story did not die of natural causes. According to Benjamin Fulford, Mr. Story came to the U.S. in March 2010 at which time he was poisoned with a virus created by the Fort Meade Biological Warfare Center. Although an antidote exists for this virus, Mr. Story was unaware that he had been poisoned with it until recently by which point his liver damage had progressed to far for treatment.

Mr. Story confirmed that an assassination attempt had been made on his life in a July 10, 2010 posting on his website which has since been removed by intelligence operatives (they were not able to remove the link, though -- only the owner of a website can do this -- which I read myself at the time that it was posted). He said that it was ordered by Bush Sr, Cheney, Obama, CIA and M16 and that he had proof of it. Here is a link to what he wrote below:

It is my hope that there are British people who will publicly honor him and express their appreciation for his patriotism, bravery, and work. Perhaps you will be someone who will be instrumental in bringing this about. It is also my hope that Her Majesty the Queen of England will do something special in his honor, given his devotion to her and his country...even if it is just a handwritten note to his family or an invitation to meet with her at the Palace.

He was a brilliant man. He had achieved a huge global audience before they killed him -- now it will spread like wildfire so I really hope that his family doesn't take down his website where the majority of his newsletters can be accessed.

......................

Christopher Story’s brilliant and courageous investigative reporting have challenged our inner vision and thoughts, on how we interpret the economic and political landscape, before us. Christopher’s unique writing talents were eloquent, exquisite and artistic, just to tap a small reservoir of his expansive creativity.

This writer, without too much success, has tried to pattern his writing after the heroic Englishman, but “ The Editor” was the crème de la crème of his profession, to say the least. Christopher’s creative and reporting verbiage excellence, was as daunting as his constant exposure of the “Financial Terrorists”, as he often referred to his executioners.

The “Editor’s” legacy is not only infinite and selfless in scope, but the internal flame of his torch will be passed to his many disciples. Disciples and followers who, as he often quoted “ Do not sit on their brain”, but have an inherited responsibility to prosecute the Financial Terrorists and hang them from every lamp posts of our convenience.

In summary, some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrusts upon them. May our Lord and Savior look after the entire Story Family.. Thank you for your vision, dedication and courage Christopher, your exquisite and valiant reporting will be continued until all the Intelligent Operatives are rounded up..

There is, sadly, unlikely to be a final resolution of the facts surrounding Christopher Story's death. If anything, his own concerns add substance to our collective anxieties on his behalf. In an email to a close friend in the USA not long before his death, Chrictopher Story emailed :

I have been feeling slightly unwell for a long time and finally the doctor has ordered tests at the Radcliffe Hospital. I have been praying hard and I am much better now. There is heightened Alkaline Phosphatase, but although I have lost a lot of weight since Christmas, most of the other symptoms of liver malfunction are absent. My doctor says it's a mystery. Hitherto (and continuing) I have relied on the very end of Mark, where He says that if we drink any poisoned drink we will not be harmed. That was the case when Hamilton fed me a Pepsi and placed a chip on my jacket several years back: they tried to whack me then. I believe that the prayer is working and a very prayerful lady correspondent in the US who is in Christ has been working overtime on this, even though I have never met her. _________________________________________________________________________________________

CS’s last posting, pulled immediately after his death:

Saturday 10 July 2010 00:01

NEW INFORMATION: BELOW: CIA/MI6.OBAMA/BUSH SR./CHENEY ORDERED CHISTOPHER STORY'S ASSASSINATION, AND ARE SUPRISED AND TERRIFIED THAT HE IS NOT DEAD. OBAMA AND BUSH ‘SPOKEN TO’ BY MEN WITH GUNS

• When ‘President’ Barack Hussein Obama touched down on the White House Lawn at 5:30pm on 9th July, he was ‘spoken to’. Enquiries by this service confirm that those doing the ‘speaking’ were not Secret Service operatives. On the contrary they were men with guns.

• Within the past 24-30 hours, private citizen George Godfather H. W. Bush Sr. has likewise been ‘spoken to’ twice. The people doing the ‘speaking’ were men with guns.

• The Chinese have had enough and are ready to take drastic lethal measures.

• Private citizens George H. W. Bush Sr. and Neil Bush think they are immortal, and can take the loot they are blocking to the grave.

• Obama, who answers to the private citizen George H. W. Bush Sr., is saying he’s a ‘national citizen’. In order to be President of the United States, under the Constitution and the Soldiers and Sailors Act, you have to be a NATURAL citizen born in the United States or born in a US military family serving abroad.

CIA/CHENEY/MI6/OBAMA/BUSH SR. HAVE ATTEMPTED TO ASSASSINATE CHRISTOPHER STORY

A detailed report on this assassination attempt and the horrible illness inflicted on the Editor as a consequence , will be published as soon as feasible.

•We now have proof that the CIA/MI6/Obama/Bush/Cheney issued an assassination order against this Editor. We have proof that they are suprised that the Editor is not dead. ...(...) _________________________________________________________________________________________

• THE WHOLE WORLD AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL KNOWS IN DETAIL ABOUT THIS U.S. CORRUPTION AND CRIMINAL FINANCIAL TERRORISM CRISIS, NOT LEAST FROM THIS WEBSITE. THEY RIGHTLY REGARD THE UNITED STATES AS AN ARROGANT, RUTHLESS PARIAH STATE THAT IMAGINES IT CAN DO WHAT IT PLEASES AS IT DESTROYS ITSELF

• LIENHOLDERS HAVE SEIZED CONTROL OF BANK OF AMERICA, CHARLOTTE, NC., AND OF DEUTSCHE BANK, FRANKFURT AND HAVE CLEANED OUT THE SABOTEURS: SEE BELOW

• HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SIGNED THE NECESSARY PAYOUT DOCUMENTS, AS EXPECTED, DURING HER VISIT TO NEW YORK. SHE WAS DOUBLE-CROSSED BY BUSH SR.

• SEE KEY POINTS BELOW AND CONFIRMATION IN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW A. CLIFTON HODGES’ LETTER TO THE BRITISH CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER, GEORGE OSBORNE, DATED 8TH JULY 2010. THIS LETTER CONFIRMS ALL OF THE KEY POINTS OUTLINED BELOW.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: ‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS: Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010] Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx): SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C. You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

• KEY POINTS:

• The Lienholders exercised a foreclosure and management takeover on Friday 2nd and Saturday 3rd July 2010 of Deutsche Bank, Frankfurt, Germany and of Bank of America, Charlotte, NC. They took this action due to ongoing sabotage by the US official keptocracy.

• They immediately removed people in both banks working for the saboteurs and opponents of the necessary resolutions and cleared derivatives (toxic debt) off the balance sheets.

• This took Deutsche Bank out of the control of Bush Sr.’s agent [see earlier reports: Archive], Chancellor Angela Merkel, and the saboteurs in Germany.

• Likewise they took the CIA’s compromised Bank of America out of the control of the corrupt bankers and CIA saboteurs in the United States.

• Her Majesty The Queen signed the necessary authorities for the Refunding Programme, the Loan Facility and other necessary papers during her visit to New York, as expected.

• As a result of the above the necessary funds were available for distribution on Tuesday 6th July 2010.

• As usual, George Bush Sr. interfered, as a consequence of which the Chinese parties had a ‘talk’ with the corrupt, demonic Godfather Bush Sr.

• By 7th July (Wednesday) a full meeting of Compliance Officers had taken place and the parties were again said to be prepared to initiate the transfers.

• Whereupon the corrupt Leon Panetta, Director of Central Intelligence (CIA), pathetically following ‘instructions’ issued by a private citizen named George H. W. Bush and issued to his poodle in the White House, the gutless Barack Hussein Obama, issued instructions to banking authorities the ‘placate but do not pay’ (accounting for the immediate lies summarised below), thus ‘preventing’ the feckless and terrified banking authorities from making any transfers.

• Bush Sr.’s poodle, Barack Hussein Obama, is too weak and lacking in backbone to grasp that Bush Sr.’s threats [see below] are BLUFF. He lacks the spine to stand up to this crook and face him down, which is the only way to deal with these possessed ‘Black’ US Nazi operatives, as we have amply demonstrated on this website

• On 7th July, the Chinese authorities then had another talk’ with Bush Sr., as a consequence of which the payout procedures were put back in place on that date, to start up at 3:00pm EDT..

• Having thus lied as usual to the Chinese parties, private citizen Bush Sr. contacted Barack Hussein Obama and INSTRUCTED HIM not to allow the release of the funds.

• In that telephone call to the White House, Bush Sr. also threatened that if Obama authorised release of the funds, Bush Sr. would go to the Supreme Court and have Obama’s Presidency terminated’ [see earlier reports, notably the Biden comment on this score].

• As a consequence, the terrified and gutless Obama obeyed the private citizen George H. W. Bush and the agreed-upon payout of the Settlement funds has not taken place.

• Michael C. Cottrell, BA, M.S., was duly advised on Tuesday 6th July that the preliminary payment due to him would be satisfied on that date and that the Loan Facility would be in place on Thursday 8th July 2010.

• On Friday 9th July ‘the word went out’ that Mr Cottrell was not to be paid, the opposite of what had been categorically stated earlier.

• The payments agreed to and set out in the Basel List have not been affected as a direct consequence of this sabotage.

• Given the above, Gold Badges, US Law Enforcement, the corrupted US military under the former CIA Director Robert Gates, et al., are all in continuing dereliction of their duty in failing to arrest and lock up the Financial Terrorist George H. W. Bush Sr., either because they, like Joseph Biden, are all blackmailed and compromised, or because they fear that Mr Bush Sr.’s thuggists will murder them, and because they lack the intelligence to understand that Bush Sr.’s behaviour amounts to nothing more than the familiar childish, weak Psy-Ops BLUFF and bullying overfamiliar to students of the Mafiosi Godfathers, of which this criminal is the most ruthless and dangerous operative alive today.

• US law enforcement, Gold badges, feckless CIA operatives, cloth-eared, arrogant and corrupt US military cadres have accordingly dragged the reputation of the United States below sewer level in the eyes of all in the know at highest levels worldwide, with their gutless behaviour.

• Everyone who is anyone in positions of relevant importance worldwide is fully aware of this scandalous state of affairs, not least from this website, which has enormous clout ‘where it matters’. They had better exercise their powers to put an end to what is undoubtedly the biggest financial terrorism and corruption crisis in world history.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

LETTER FROM ATTORNEY-AT-LAW A. CLIFTON HODGES TO GEORGE OSBORNE, BRITISH CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER: 8TH JULY 2010

HODGES AND ASSOCIATES A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 4 EAST HOLLY STREET SUITE 202 PASADENA CA 91103

I write to you once more in furtherance of matters raised in my prior correspondence of June 25, 2010; I understand that you have received instructions regarding my approach, and the various points raised in my earlier messages. Your assistance is most urgently required in addressing these matters, and the apparent disavowal of earlier agreements made and reaffirmed at previous G-8 meetings concerning the U.S. Dollar Refunding Project. I write on behalf of my clients Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., of Erie, Pennsylvania, USA, and his corporations: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., registered in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Cottrell Securities Limited, registered in England and Wales.

The events of the past week are difficult to understand, and impossible to tolerate. I am advised and understand that the Lienholders executed a foreclosure and management takeover Fri-Sat 2-3 July of Deutsche Bank in Frankfurt, Germany, and of Bank of America in Charlotte, NC.

They “cleaned out” both banks of people working for the opponents and cleared toxic debt [including derivatives] off the bank balance sheets. Accordingly, they took DB out of the control of Angela Merkel and opponents in Germany, and they took BOA out of all possible control by the opponents in this country. As a result of these actions, it was expected that the World Global Settlement funds could be distributed this week.

These funds were available for distribution on Tuesday, July 6. Because George Bush Sr. was initiating interference, the Chinese authorities then had a “talk” with Bush Sr. By Wednesday afternoon a full Compliance Officer meeting had been conducted, and the appropriate parties were again prepared to initiate the transfers when Mr. Leon Panetta, pursuant to instructions from President Obama and George Bush Sr. issued instructions to the banking authorities to “placate but do not pay”; this prevented the authorities from making any such transfers. I am advised that the Chinese authorities then had another “talk” with Bush Sr., and all was ready again on today, July 7, and set to commence @ 3:00 PM EDT.

At approximately 3:00 PM EDT, I am told by several sources, George Bush Sr. apparently contacted President Obama and instructed him not to allow release of the funds. Bush Sr. then advised the President that if the funds were released, Bush would “go to the Supreme Court and have Obama’s Presidency terminated”. In accord with these instructions, the payout of the World Global Settlement funds has not proceeded.

THE PAYMENTS PREVIOUSLY AGREED TO AND SET FORTH ON THE BASEL LIST HAVE NOT BEEN MADE AS A DIRECT RESULT OF THESE CONTINUED DELAYS. Direct intervention through your good offices on behalf of the Royal Monarchal Power, is absolutely required to bring this matter to conclusion. To secure release of these Settlement funds, it is imperative that your power as one of the U.S. Treasury Lienholders, be exercised with such force as may be required to effect completion.

I respectfully plead that you utilize the inherent Royal Monarchal Power at the earliest possible moment to ensure completion of this funding. Thank you in advance for your assistance; please contact me directly if I can provide any additional information or help.

THE FOLLOWING DATA HAS BEEN PUBLISHED AT THE FOOT OF MOST OF THESE REPORTS FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS++:

• COMPILED BY U.S. SECURITIES EXPERT MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S..

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE.

In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

Story was poisoned during a March, 2010 visit to the US with a virus created by the Fort Meade biological warfare facility, according to close associates of Story who spoke to him the day before his July 14th death. Although there exists an antidote for this virus, Story was unaware he was poisoned with it until recently by which point his liver damage had progressed too far for treatment, according to the sources.

Although Story is now dead, his sources will continue to provide the public with vital information about the secret financial war that is now raging towards its conclusion. The murder of Story will not go un-avenged, according to several sources inside the U.S. and UK military-industrial complex.

The murder of Story is part of a broader, but doomed campaign to silence journalists. Jane Burgermeister, who did much to expose the pharmaceutical industry’s involvement in the creation of the H1N1 virus, contacted this writer today saying she feared for her life. She is the victim of systematic harassment by Austrian security service thugs and their corporate/government bosses.

This writer has also been the target of multiple murder attempts. The same cabal that killed my colleague Paul Klebnikov (the former Forbes Moscow Bureau Chief) and killed Daniel Pearle of the Wall Street Journal, has been systematically murdering journalists around the world as a part of their effort keep in power and fool the public with their fake “war on terror.”

Systems Development Consultant Itemizes Visible Computer Futures

"Visible Computer Futures"

October 24, 2010 A.D.

A lot depends on what you want to do now, and what you want to do tomorrow and the month after that. I realize this is a difficult question to answer, because most of us do not have special knowledge of the future, but it's still a good question to ask ...

If all you really want to do RIGHT NOW can be handled easily by a used dual-core machine e.g. LGA-775 with 16GB of RAM, great deals can be had in the used & refurb marketplace.

(We LUV our ASUS P5Q Premium with Q9550 and 4 x 4GB of DDR2.)

If/when current standards get implemented in hardware, you can demote your dual-core machine to a simple storage server e.g. for backups of important data sets like drive images of your system software partition.

Hard drives have become so huge, it's most practical now to make multiple copies of key data sets, distributed across multiple machines: switch your storage server OFF to guarantee virus and malware protection!

There are several reasons for waiting to spend your whole budget now, including but not limited to:

(1) widespread availability of SATA/6G and SAS/6G SSDs: hopefully, this development will depress market prices for SATA/3G SSDs across the board: e.g. Sandforce SF-2000 series;

(2) native support for SAS/6G and SATA/6G in chipsets: AMD's 890FX chipset is a good example of leadership in this category;

(3) quad-channel memory controllers integrated into CPUs, hopefully also available for the ATX standard using 4 x DIMM slots instead of 8 x DIMM slots (as predicted by some writers): think of highly integrated ATX and micro-ATX motherboards with memory bandwidths in the neighborhood of 50,000 MB/second (seriously!);

(4) PCI-Express 3.0, which is planned to ramp up to a 130/128 jumbo frame at the bus level, finally doing away with the 10/8 protocol that was originally designed for dial-up modems now obsolete;

(5) my favorite, which is only theoretical at the moment: upgrading the SATA protocol to exploit 130/128 jumbo frames in chipsets and WD's 4K "advanced format" in storage media, ideally using 4K jumbo frames during transmission with a minimum of ECC overhead bits; I can see this happening sooner than later, using driver enhancements and even HDD jumpers until it becomes standard: see WD's recent 3TB HDD which comes with an add-on controller to overcome the 2TB barrier;

(6) native chipset support for TRIM and similar garbage collection features in all RAID modes, not just JBOD with AHCI enabled;

(7) wider availability of very high-density RAM e.g. 8GB and 16GB per DIMM at affordable prices: this development should emerge with the migration to sub-30nm technology at high-volume fabs like GlobalFoundaries;

(10) UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface) which is currently a real "sleeper" as far as publicity is concerned, but I predict it will revolutionize the task of configuring machine settings for various system and application tasks: imagine a machine with enough RAM to load the entire OS into a ramdisk in the upper H/W addresses: and you thought SSDs were fast :)

So, plan accordingly. If all you need is a minivan to take the kids to soccer games, and shop for groceries or garden tools, you definitely would NOT want to spend tons of money on a Ferrari if it meant you couldn't afford the minivan too :)

state OF WISCONSIN FALSELY ALLEGED IN HAND WRITTEN ANALYSIS ( EXHIBIT : LEW_3 ) THAT I EARNED

[1] $42,000.00 FYI 1986

[2] $43,000.00 FYI 1987

[3] $42,000.00 FYI 1988

[4] $42,000.00 FYI 1989

IGNORING THE FACT THAT I HAD NEVER EARNED ANY INCOME AS ALLEGED IN THEIR state CIVIL INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT [ CONTRARY TO USA/IRS RULES AND REGULATIONS AND US DISTRICT COURT LITIGATION ] FOR FYI 1986, 1987, 1988 .. AND THEY ACKNOWLEDGED THAT I WAS AN INLAND TAX RESIDENT, EFFECTIVE JULY 01, 1988 AND CONTINUING IN VIENNA/WIEN, AUSTRIA UNDER EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT ....

AND

IGNORING THAT THE state OF WISCONSIN - OUTAGAMIE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT SATISFACTION OF DELINQUENT TAX WARRANT NO. 4400162088, FILING DATE 05/02/91, TYPE OF TAX INCOME .... WAS FULLY SATISFIED AND THE CLERK OF SAID COURT IS AUTHORIZED TO SATISFY AND DISCHARGE SAID TAX WARRANT OF RECORD, PURSUANT TO S. 71.91(5)(f) OF THE WIS STATS, WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE BY ; LINDA BUSSE << STAMPED : OUTAGAMIE COUNTY FILED, JUNE 04 1993 RUTH H. JANSSEN, CLERK OF COURTS - NOTARY PUBLIC : SUSAN J. RICKEY>>.

LET US ALL COLLECTIVELY AND LAWFULLY UNDERSTAND THE REAL INCIDENTS ....

NO TAXABLE INCOME FYI 1986, 1987, JAN THRU JUNE, 1988;

INLAND TAX RESIDENT AND DOMICILED JUNE, 1988 IN VIENNA/WIEN, AUSTRIA,

DOMICILED AS DIRECTEUR-GENERAL OF NEW REPUBLIC/USA FINANCIAL GROUP, LTD GES.m.b.H., 28/15 KARTNERSTRABE, A-1010, WITH A FIVE YEAR RESIDENCY LEASE WITH FIVE YEAR EXTENSIONS, ARRANGED BY U.S. EMBASSY, ET AL; AUSTRIAN CORPORATION FILED AND AUTHORIZED WITH AUSTRIAN HIGH COURT, AUSTRIAN TAX AGENTS, OFFICE OF THE CHANCELLOR, VIENNA/WIEN POLICE NOTIFICATIONS, USA AND AUSTRIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, INTER ALIA ....

IN LAUSANNE AND GENEVE, SWITZERLAND TO MEET WHITE HOUSE DEPUTY COUNSEL, VINCE FOSTER AT HOTEL DE LA PAIX, JULY 07, 1993 .... IN RE : CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND FOR CHARITABLE GRANT OF $250 MILLION AS NOTED TO CHAIRMAN LAURA D'ANDREA TYSON, WHITE HOUSE ECONOMIC COUNCILTO U.S. PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON.

ENROUTE TO HOTEL DE LA PAIX, GENEVE PER LODGING INSTRUCTIONS OF VINCE FOSTER, I AM FALSELY ARRESTED AND WRONGFULLY IMPRISONED IN SWITZERLAND BY SUISSE SURETE FOR 134 DAYS IN A SUISSE DUNGEON No. 130, AND FINALLY VISITED BY US CONSUL CARLOS MEDINA, WITHOUT ANY ARREST WARRANTS, ONLY A COOPERATION CALL FROM state OF WISCONSIN [USA] FOR FAILURE TO PAY CIVIL INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT OF $14,129.00.

PLEASE NOTE :

JUNE 3, 1992 $14,129.00 PAID IN FULL

JUNE 24, 1992 $14,129.00 STATE DEPT OF REVENUE

CASHED / DEPOSITED

JUNE 4, 1993 SATISFACTION OF DELINQUENT TAX

WARRANT FILING

JULY 7, 1993FALSELY ARRESTED AND WRONGFULLY

IMPRISONED IN LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND

WITHOUT ARREST WARRANT FOR FAILURE

TO PAY CIVIL INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT,

AND US CONSUL CARLOS MEDINA

STATES .......

"DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE SUISSE CONFEDERATION AND USA TAX TREATIES"

SUISSE SURETE IMEDIATELY TAKES HIM OUT TO AVOID MISSING HIS TRAIN

MAY 1995 NON-JURISDICTIONAL JURY TRIAL WITHOUT COUNSEL OF CHOICE, CONVICTED FOR FAILURE TO PAY $14,129.00, SENTENCE 22 YEARS IN WISCONSIN PRISONS, WISCONSIN finally CONFIRMS IN NOVEMBER, 1995, THE FULL PAYMENT OF $14,129.00 - BUT TO LATE FOR MY AMERICAN FREEDOM, EVENTUALLY RENDITIONED TO CCA-SAYRE [OKLA] MAXIMUM PRISON_OVP AL GORE AND WHITE HOUSE ERSKINE BOWLES INTERVENES, AND I AM DISCHARGED ABSOLUTELY_14 NOVEMBER 2005, FOR A STATE CRIME NEVER COMMITTED. SO MUCH FOR WISCONSIN AND FEDERAL BILL OF RIGHTS.

AMERICAN JUSTICE " CHANGES ARE TRULY OVERDUE " MAY GOD BLESS OUR GREAT NATION FROM " STATE AGENT PROVOCATEURS" AND CREATE ECONOMIC RECOVERY WITH AmeriRail HIGH SPEED RAIL TRANSPORTATION WITHOUT US TAXPAYER GRANTS/SUBSIDIES. THANK YOU FOR CARING, Brgds, Lee

___

GREENSPAN REPORTEDLY AIDS AND BRIBES GEORGE BUSH and FAMILY, Part Three by Sherman H. Skolnick

A senior U.S. Treasury Department official, in the Office of Internal Affairs, in his own-hand-writing, reportedly analyzed more than twenty five banks by which the Federal Reserve participated in facilitating the bribery and corruption of former President George Herbert Walker Bush and his three sons. The secret wire transfer records, some copies of which are attached to Part One and Part Two of this series, show billions and billions of dollars transferred to and from reported accounts of the Elder Bush and his sons. Much of this directly authorized by the secret codes of Federal Reserve dictator Alan Greenspan. Since he acts like a corrupt Soviet commissar, he is called by us ALAN REDSPAN, acting as he is answerable to no one(except the nameless, faceless ruling elite who own and operate America).

===to Neil Bush, who had been an official of the now defunct-by-fraud Silverado Savings & Loan of Denver. Through corruption linked to the American CIA and a major law firm in Chicago, Hopkins & Sutter, Neil Bush escaped being properly prosecuted on federal criminal charges of causing the downfall of this federally-insured thrift acting covertly for the espionage agency. Hopkins & Sutter in the early 1990s had been the major outside counsel of the S & L bail-out agency, Resolution Trust Corporation, like Silverado, also themselves out of existence. There is an overlap to the corruption of Bush family crony, William Rockefeller Clinton. [More on this in a later part of this series.]

===Jeb Bush (Governor of Florida) and his Colombia-born wife reportedly implicated in massive dope trafficking and money laundering Colombian cocaine through reputed Bush family accounts in Banco Exterior De Espana, Malaga, Spain. Ostensibly arranged through Bush family cocaine money laundry wizard Giogrio Pelossi. For details, visit our website: http://skolnicksreport.com ===George W. Bush (Governor of Texas) through huge amounts in the Bush family reputed accounts, in and through NCNB of Texas, Garland, Texas. See Parts One and Two of this series. And reportedly by and through reputed Bush family accounts in Banco de Occidente, Panama City, Panama and Banco de Panama, Panama City, Panama. To cover up such details, the Bush family had to have Panama strongman, Manuel Noriega, grabbed by U.S. military in an invasion and transported to Florida for supposed "trial". A corrupt federal judge kept all Bush family corruption matters linked to Noriega and the American CIA OUT OF THE COURT RECORD.

Who all are involved, and what is involved, in the massive river of clandestine and illicit funds to and from the Elder Bush and his three sons? It falls mainly into these categories:

[2] The reported bribery of judges of the Texas Supreme Court to okay a TWELVE BILLION DOLLAR lower court judgment in favor of the Elder Bush's firm, PENNZOIL, against TEXACO, a major importer of oil from Iraq. Bush as well strong-armed the U.S. Supreme Court judges in the Pennzoil-Texaco case. (More in a further part of this series.)

[4] Extortion and kick-backs, extracted from the weak oil sheikdoms of the Persian Gulf, done from the decade of 1980 to 1990, by the Elder Bush and his then private business partner, Saddam Hussein, the Iraqi strongman. Transactions through the Chicago branch of Italy's largest bank, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, owned in part by the Vatican. And arms deals for Saddam through BNL-Atlanta with the connivance of Bush and Hillary Clinton. (More coming.)

[5] Political assassinations and other bloody dirty tricks by the Bush family and others, through Bank of Credit and Commerce International, BCCI, and its alter ego and successor, Pinnacle Banc Group, of the Chicago mafia enclave of Cicero jointly with the head of the Vatican Bank. (More coming.)

The Clintons close crony, Vincent W. Foster, Jr., was being tracked as a possible traitorous spy assisting Jonathan Pollard, long before Foster's short term position as Deputy Counsel in the Clinton White House, a secret government report states.

The details are in a report put together by retired former intelligence agents and submitted to their former superiors. When the higher ups wanted the matter covered up, the team showed it to members of our group who took notes but were not permitted to keep a copy.

Surveilled under orders of a clandestine court meeting in a sound-proof facility in the District of Columbia area, Foster was shown to have coded Swiss and other accounts ostensibly put there for him by Israeli intelligence, The Mossad [The Institute]. The seldom-mentioned Court's authority stemmed from the 1978 law, under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Usually, a federal judge from Chicago was one of those on the court panel. Deposits at Foster's account at one bank on the Swiss-Italian border, at Chiasso, Banca Della Svizzera Italiana--and accounts elsewhere--held at times two, seven, and as much as ten million dollars between them, the report details. The deposits were put there reportedly for Foster's co-operation with The Mossad. Foster may have been blackmailed or tricked, however, by way of the purported existence of these accounts, to supply top-most U.S. secrets to Israel and to work jointly with Jonathan Pollard, now serving a life sentence for confessing to spying for Israel as to U.S. secrets on the arming of Iraq by George Herbert Walker Bush and Caspar Weinberger. Foster, the report states, worked jointly with the person using the pseudonym of "Robert Maxwell", a high-level Mossad official posing as a U.S./British/European purported business tycoon in the mass media and elsewhere. Maxwell mysteriously fell off his boat to his death in the Atlantic late in 1991. His business empire, thereafter shown to be a fraud, collapsed. Others may likewise be blackmailing Israel, the report shows.

The suppressed document goes on to detail that since the early 1980s, Foster held the equivalent rank, as if he were a military general, in the super-duper civilian government spying and code-cracking operation of the U.S., the National Security Agency. Foster continued this work in the fews months that he was Deputy Counsel of the Clinton White House. In the 1980s and thereafter, Foster, with the aid of the Elder Bush, ran a so-called "Gold Bank" in the Caribbean, for supplying clandestine gold for use by spy operatives, the report sets out.

For more than twelve years, Foster traveled widely for the NSA, sometimes on behalf of reputed NSA proprietary, Systematics, then headquartered in Arkansas. Systematics purported to be supplying bank computer software services. They actually apparently were spying on banks worldwide, friend and foe alike, for NSA. Traveling for NSA/Systematics hundreds of thousands of miles, Foster was the master-mind of an NSA project that tracked Federal Reserve and private wire transfers between banks, trillions of dollars per day. Foster acted jointly in the project with the aid of his two Rose Law Firm partners, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and Webster Hubbell who had been Mayor of Little Rock and once Acting Chief Judge of the Arkansas Supreme Court. Foster's airline travel records, the report shows, were issued in his capacity as a "U.S. Government Official".

Because of being the master inquisitor of this action, Foster never believed the project and circumstances might someday find his own purported foreign coded accounts, or that such accounts, if he did not already know the funds were parked there for him---that such purported coded accounts could supposedly finger him as having violated American espionage laws.

This trio---Foster, Hillary, Hubbell---and their project made use of computer software, superior for money tracking, called PROMIS, stolen from its copyright-owner and developer, INSLAW, Inc. High officials in the Reagan/Bush Administration, in fact, with the particular aid of George Bush, reportedly stole the software and sold it to foreign espionage agencies, supposedly for tracking political dissidents. The software actually had a "trap door" for the American CIA and the NSA to spy on intelligence agencies, friend and foe alike. The report contends that to successfully expose all this and Foster's role might damage both the G.O.P and the Democrat Party.

A code-name-only Federal Agency commissioned the retired intelligence agents to put together a report on Foster which was never supposed to be referred to publicly or see the light of day. Not supposed to be de-classified for thirty years, the report contends among events:

=== Foster, as spy chief, assisted Jonathan Pollard, a lower level analyst at the Office of Naval Intelligence, ONI, to carry through security blocks, the equivalent of an entire room full of the highest U.S. secrets on nuclear weapons, including tracking and targetting details and satellite co-ordinating codes and data. [Some of these details in binders were found in or near Foster's White House office after his death.] ===That Foster assisted Pollard on behalf of then Vice President George Bush and then U.S. Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. And Foster caused others to assist Pollard who did not himself have the authority to be carrying such secrets home with him. Both Foster and Pollard were apparently paid for this: supposedly through the use of PROMIS Software and other means, to supply Israel with such data long before Israel had developed its own proficiency in the same field.

===In so doing, Foster purportedly enabled Israel to be perceived as a genuine nuclear threat to the then Soviet Union.

===That the so-called "publisher" tycoon, using the fake name "Robert Maxwell", assisted in these joint efforts. [When "Maxwell" died mysteriously, he was buried with top honors as if he were the head of Israeli intelligence, The Mossad.]

===That Foster jointly with his NSA/Systematics partners, Hillary Rodham Clinton and Webster Hubbell (who went on to become 3rd in command in the Clinton Justice Department), supervised and strategized for the NSA purported proprietary, which, in turn, made use of the reputedly stolen INSLAW software. [A Chicago-area attorney, a close crony of Hillary's, John E. Gierum, of the suburb of Park Ridge, where she is from, confessed to this writer, in the presence of a witness, that the Clinton White House was trying to frame him on matters related to this. Gierum did not dispute the details of his confession when we confronted him in the Federal District Court in Chicago, 1996-97. The purpose of the intended "frame-up" was to silence Gierum.]

===That the Foster-Hillary-Hubbell trio aided the worldwide surveilliance on bank wire transfers and transactions, through the INSLAW "trap door". Also spying on transactions on an advance data basis, of stock, bond, commodities, and options trading and brokering in the U.S. and elsewhere. This spying, the report states, benefitted certain high-level persons in the U.S. and elsewhere, including George Herbert Walker Bush, Caspar Weinberger, and others. Among the places used, the report contends, was a highly secret, heavily secure operation on the 94th Floor of the World Trade Center in New York City. That operation, the report asserts, may have been the target of the bombing of that building in 1993 since the basement attack would cause noxious fumes to gather on the upper floors. (One of the accused so-called "Arab terrorists" bombers was actually close to Israeli intelligence, the report states.)

The document raises the issue that Israel and others may have had an interest to knock out the 94th floor operation.

According to the report, a former high-level Mossad official, living in the Chicago-area, co-ordinates some of the bank and brokerage spying, through a super-computer built into his home. The retired intelligence agency team assert that he is a renegade now working AGAINST The Mossad and is highly corrupt. His address and particulars were made available by certain other sources for the purposes of targetting him for a so-called Israeli revenge attack on his residence. By accident some years prior, this writer interviewed that official when he supposedly was still an Israeli official.

The report goes on to contend that Hillary was more or less Foster's "lover" and had knowledge of his purported coded secret accounts; that Hillary had what is known in law as a beneficial interest in those accounts in Switzerland and elsewhere.

The report goes on to detail how Hillary and Foster were apparently able to black-mail various members of the U.S. Congress and federal agencies. The report lists 240 top U.S. Officials who took bribes or were black-mailed as if they did take the bribes, by way of bribery funds parked in Swiss and other banks. A small group of former intelligence operatives, very adept with super-computers, traced and determined these coded accounts and through computer trickery, caused the accounts to be entirely withdrawn and wiped out, and the deposits transferred. Over 3-1/2 million dollars of coded accounts supposedly belonging to U.S. officials, were transferred to the U.S. Treasury Holding Account---a device for seizing illicit foreign funds of U.S. citizens.

The report contends, however, that under disguise of being seized for the U.S. Treasury Holding Account, that the funds were actually stolen by the computer wizards. Left unanswered, the report asserts, is whether these accounts, including that supposedly of Foster with Hillary's beneficial interest, ever went to the U.S. Treasury Holding Account or actually to private accounts, including those of George Herbert Walker Bush and his family, and certain renegade operations of the American CIA, French CIA, the Mossad, British Counter-Intelligence, and others.

Shortly before his death, the report states, Foster was upset when informed by the First Lady that Foster's purported coded accounts, supposedly from Israel, were found out and seized; that Foster was about to be charged with treason against the U.S. based on those purported accounts. Those about to charge Foster, the report states that Hillary informed Foster, claimed he should have been sent to life in prison along with his confederate Jonathan Pollard. Hillary is quoted in the report as informing Foster that she thinks if he were to finger his accomplices in the Pollard treason, namely George Herbert Walker Bush and Caspar Weinberger; that it would not constitute a practical criminal defense in view of the influence of those two with the Courts.

The report raises the issue that Foster's brother-in-law, Beryl Anthony, former Arkansas Congressman, might be implicated in the spying jointly through Anthony's boss, Jim Thompson, former Illinois Governor and financed for high office by the Rockefeller Family. Thompson has been chairman of the 400-member, Chicago-headquartered law firm, with worldwide offices, Winston & Strawn, of which Anthony has been a key member in their District of Columbia office.

The report makes the sinister point that Foster's death was "arranged" and "necessary" for reasons of protecting the bank/brokerage/foreign intelligence agency spying project. That Foster had to be "terminated" for "national security".

In the Second Section of Part Three: More about why and HOW Foster was murdered. And the role of Redspan/Bush. Stay tuned.

Global Sovereign Handbook,.

She:kon:

The book, Global Sovereign Handbook, may be of interest to what we have been discussing as to corporation soles, and LCCs or Cannon Law Trusts. This book discusses the problem, creating awareness, which recommending some actions, but does offer means of achieving lasting solutions.

It is obvious that the authors are not legal scholars with their gross misuse of legal terms such as individual, humans, Americans, etc. However, the issue being discussed or being brought forward are valid concepts or precepts that need consideration. Though, I do not agree with some of the conclusions. I have not read this book, I have only skimmed through some of its pages, reading a few, and thought it to be noteworthy.

As example the title, "Individual Sovereignty" of chapter two is oxymoron; those two terms are the opposite of each other. An individual is property, which cannot possess sovereignty. The term individual is always used in relation to corporate fictions. The ONLY time that the term individual is defined in US Codes, is the immigration code which states that an individual is "a United States citizen or resident alien." Therefore, if you are an individual which one are you?

The term "human resource" is now frequently used by government officials, employers and banksters. The definition in law of these terms are: human, a monster or beast; resource, money or proper. Which one of these are you? Monsters and beasts are kept in CAGES OR PENS; money and proper are expendable. Any questions on how bureaucRATs view their SLAVES. A RESERVATION is a very large PEN.

This book appears to be peddling constitutional government, which I do not agree with, since such leads to central government and concentration of power. I prefer small sustainable communities joined or linked by confederation. The group of Iroquois Nations is a confederacy; the sixteen (so-called) southern states of the 1860s was a confederacy; and the lawful de jure government of the United State of America is a confederacy. Both the constitutional Republic and constitutional Democracy of the United States of America are defacto FRAUDS.

The authors continually and grossly misuse the term "We the People" and claim that "state" citizen is great. They seem to believe the patriot mythology that "We the People" are the people of the United States of America in general; however, if one will take time to read or listen to Lysander Spooner's "No Treason" it will become obvious the We the People ONLY applies the charter members of the United States of America, Incorporated. The general population are not and have never been privileged charter members, all of whom are now DEAD.

Both audio book and ebook of No Treason can be download FREE and are found near bottom of front page of http://militias.info. John Harris' It is Illusion can be found there, as well. There is, also, a great article on Oaths and Jurisdiction. "You are a slave to government" will soon be posted there, too; this video is on www.YouTube.com The gentleman giving the short lecture is an Iroquois from Wisconsin.

So-called state citizenship should return one to status under the Articles of Confederation; however, those peddling such always talk about being subject to the de facto CON CON of 1787. I do not care which constitution that is chosen, it still is a CON that subjugates the people to the Holy See and the British Crown. I will not knowingly serve either.

It is noteworthy that the author mentioned Supreme Court Case brought by the Cherokee nation in the early eighteen hundreds, which the lost; but similar Case was brought by a US citizen and the Case was won. It is simple, a US citizen is a corporate fiction, the Cherokee nation was a non entity. Only corporate fictions have standing in the corporate court system, all the way to the World Court.

The Republic of Texas took suit against the State of Texas back in 1996. The Supreme Court of Texas ruled that they had no jurisdiction. The Republic appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States, who ruled that they had no jurisdiction. Neither Court told the Republic of Texas Officials why there was no jurisdiction. They appealed to the World Court and the World Court ruled that they could not hear the case because the Republic of Texas was not a CORPORATION; therefore, there was no jurisdiction of "persons".

Here in the land of OZ under Babylonian Talmudic Law only corporate factions have standing. Therefore, one must incorporate or register as corporation sole. The moron henchmen of the British Crown, who are in charge did not think that we would ever figure out how to do the latter; and if an attorner is involved it is his job to convince you to be good little slaves, and incorporate. Under Babylonian Law there must always be means of escape.

Also, it appears that the authors have made another common mistake attacking Christianity under assumption that Christianity was synonymous with Catholicism. It is not! Catholicism and its daughter harlots claim to be Christians, and they are not. Christianity is a way of life, not a religion. The term Christian carries the mean of being subjects or heirs of Messiah.

State religionists most certainly do not fit that classification or category, since they are all lawbreakers, either denying Torah outrightly or claiming that somehow Torah magically disappeared. Each state religion has created their own set of laws, statutes and traditions. Most state religions are peddling Talmudic Law in part or whole, many doing such unknowingly.

True Christians accept Yahshua Messiah as King of king, HERE and NOW! State religionist outright deny that Kingship or claim that it is sometime in the distant future. They deny his Kingship because he is the King of Peace, and they are warmongers.

Small sustainable communities with community based government are what true communism is. It is the next step above peaceful anarchy and most certainly is easiest to control. Communism in its truest form is communal living, the family. Sustainable communities are a group of families united for common cause and in many cases such communities are related families.

Take a good look at Abraham's extended family that is recorded in the Books of Genesis and I Chronicles. His sustainable community was a force not to be messed with; the King of Sodom learned the hard way and Abraham gave the King of Sodom a mentality adjustment. The Zionist slave masters are scared to death of having slaves learn these basic principles and precepts, which were practiced and taught by father Abraham, who even had his own militia of 500 well armed and trained men.

Most involved in Islam comprehend these principles, which is why the Zionist continually beat the drums, kill Arabs, kill Arabs. Twenty years ago, checks and credit cards were not accepted in most Arab nations. As result of wars and conquest they have been forced to accept such means of thievery, while the Israelis steal their oil, placing them in state of bankruptcy, as most original nations of the Americas.

Oh, by the way, state religionists teach that father Abraham had two sons, however, the Holy Scripture records the names of fourteen sons of Abraham and the names of two wives and two concubines. Though, too, the Scriptures state that he had several concubines and other children. These facts do not set well with state religionists or most dumb sheople with slave mentality, who were educated by the public fool system. Oops!

Over the past 1000 years Roman Catholicism has influenced peoples and religions around the world and their dogma has been adopted by various cultures without the people even realizing how it happened. There are 11 women for every man world wide, in US the ratio is 5.4 women to every 4 men. There have always been more women then men. State religion's answer to the problem is for the women, who cannot find husbands, they can become nuns or prostitutes. See how simple it is to solve the problem! Too, this imbalance is why so many desperate women marry JERKS, only to soon regret they did that.

The most common forms of marriage practiced in Holy Scriptures were polygamy, polygyny and harems; though, priests usually were monogamous. I personally recommend polygyny as defined in Scripture; polygyny is not the mere having of multiple wives, but the how and why. See Isaiah 4:1 and the entire Book of Ruth. In the Book of Ruth, whose hand in marriage does Boaz ask the court to grant? State religionists deny the obvious. In polygyny, women do the choosing or taking, not the man.

In polygamy and harems, it is usually the man, who does the choosing or taking; with women usually being purchased and often without any say. See Genesis 29:10 through 30:26, where Jacob purchased two wives and two concubines. Only Rachel agreed to the purchase, the other three were forced into the arrangement. Both concubines were forced into the arrangement by other WOMEN. Rachel is the grandmother of the Iroquois and Cherokee Nations, and the Nation of Iceland.

Monogamy is not mandated law, except for SLAVES. Monogamy was recommendation by Paul for congregational leaders and missionaries, however, he stated that he would rather they remain celibate. In US, 78% of monogamous marriages end in divorce within five years, and 86% end within twenty years. Wake up, monogamous marriages are banksters' and attorners' dreams; they profit at loss of those families, who do not survive. And, such families are easily controlled by government or their bankster masters. Welcome to slave mentality. Selah!

For the ladies, who are reading this and are MAD as hell, think about this, would you rather know who your husband is having sex with every day or would you rather he be sneaking off down the street or across town? Monogamy promotes this type of inappropriate behavior and is second major cause of divorce. Here is something else to think about, "many hands make for light work." Most women involved in monogamous marriages are running on burnout or near exhaustion, which causes most of them to just give up and walk away.

Empire building requires major adjustment of most people's thinking; especially, women, who have been trained to be good little feminist or feminazis. Women in US, today, have been taught by the public fool system to become control freaks and selfish or possessive. Consequently they seldom achieve their potential. And, male chauvinists have the wrong idea; they cannot survive in such an arrangement. And, women, who make such a decision as to marriage, very seldom would ever select a man, who smokes or drinks, because a group of women making such decision, make such upon rational intelligent thinking, not emotions. Abraham taught empire building, creation of dynasties. King David and King Solomon built huge dynasties; and in doing such King Solomon ruled in PEACE. Selah!

Back to the main issue for writing this letter. State of Nevada will not allow registration of corporation soles after June 2011, and such is already limited or restricted.

There appears that nine states are still allowing registration. State of Washington is one of the nine. Read the chapter of State statute or code that deals with corporation sole. This is important for comprehension of what is happening and to know what terms to use when filling out registration form. In particular read Chapter 84 of the State of Nevada statutes; the changes and coming changes are glaringly obvious to what is about to happen in 2011.

Also, read 26 USC § 508 (c)(1)(A) note that it states MANDATORY; and then compare to 26 USC § 501(c)(3). Please note that the latter are religious organizations, not churches. State Religionists LIE; they call themselves CHURCHES, when in actuality they are religious organizations. Churches are corporation soles, not religious organizations.

Religious organizations are CORPORATIONS. Corporations are citizens subject to the government under which these are created, requiring charter and approval of their master.

Churches are corporation soles, which do not require charter and not subject to some master. Corporation soles are based on some set of existing principles or laws. The registration is not for seeking to exist, but for purpose to do business, engaging in commerce within US, as foreign nation. However, the registration is the tricky part, it is all in how two papers are filled out as to whether the corporation sole will maintain sovereignty, and yet be able to do business within the US.

Corporation soles should ONLY hold paper: stocks, bonds, and bank accounts. It should NEVER hold property. NEVER! The corporation soles is to be used as a shield, buffer or trust, not some dictatorship. Properties should be held by LLCs or Cannon Law Trusts, which are under control of the governing body but owned by the corporation sole. When LLCs are setup properly there is NO tax filing or reporting required, however, there is flat tax or annual fee. LLCs are tax exempt when owned by corporation soles, therefore, not required to become 501(c)(3)s. Go back and read 508(c)(1)(A).

The IRS' Tax Guide for Churches and Religious Organization deliberately attempts to mislead and misrepresent what a "church" is. The IRS attempts to make the reader falsely believe that the requirements under 501(c)(3) apply to churches. What a scam. The rules only apply if a church mistakenly applies for tax exemption. Churches (corporation soles) are mandatorially exempt, therefore, have no need to apply for IRS permission. Asking IRS permission makes the IRS the master. The Church is itself law and master.

Under Babylonian and Roman Law, only corporation soles and corporate soles possess absolute sovereignty. However, a corporation sole or corporate sole can extend sovereign immunity to its subjects or members of its body politic; this is a biblical principle, as well. The Holy Scriptures teach universal ambassadorship comes with membership as being Christians. Oops!

BureaucRats do not want that to be known. Therefore, it is all in how a corporation sole is set up and operated; and who sits as figurehead. A chauvinist, drunkard, tyrant or fool in position of power would quickly destroy a nation. King James was known as "the wisest fool in all of Christendumb". (sic - misspelling was intentional) We have lived and suffered under 400 years of bondage because of this FOOL and his successors. The time has come, "Let my people go!"

In establishing sustainable communities, it should be always considered that foreigners should be taxed not the children. Taxing of land and property of the children (community members) is unconscionable. Limited tax on sale, import and export of certain items or goods would be acceptable, such as tobacco, alcohol, fuel and gambling. Foreigners would consume such goods more then the people of the community.

Fuel tax producing funds for maintaining and building roads. Tax on our goods produce funds for building and maintaining, community office, maintenance barn, community center or longhouse, fire station and emergency medical facility. These items cost three million dollars or more and are much needed for sustainability.

The best way of not taxing the people (membership) is for the community (government thereof) to own some source of renewable energy (community property) and everyone (members and foreigners) pays for what they use of this property. The proceeds, therefrom, are used to finance infrastructure. Most hippie communities of the sixties and seventies FAILED because they were not established on sound principles and they failed to provide for infrastructure. Love, peace and dope just does not make for bright future. I have always been a flower child at heart, but I always have known that proper perspective for stability was love, peace and hope! For I have a dream, and I have seen the Promised Land.

There are four things that must be maintained for a sustainable community to survive. First investment and development of source(s) of renewable energy, and then fire and emergency medical services, as well as, construction and maintenance of roads. There is no need for PIGS, if these maxims of law are applied, "A man's home is his castle" and "Every man is sheriff at his front door." Therefore, it is essential that each community establish it own militia and posse. The people are peace keepers, and not law enforcers.

Therefore, choosing wisely the principles or law upon which the corporation sole is based is extremely important. My preference is Torah, which is the Great Law of Love and its 679 Statutes of Liberty. As with the Roman Maxims of Law, Torah cannot change; the principles or precepts remain constant. Too, under Torah there is very little need for jails or prisons, since offenders are usually exiled or executed. Problem solved, no need for police state.

Men are not sovereign. Only Deity, Yah the Great Spirit, is Sovereign. However, men can be cloaked with sovereignty or possess sovereign immunity. This requires rethinking, since most people have been brainwashed by Masonic thinking that somehow man is or can become deity, which is mere HOGWASH.

Men teach that because they are able to create some fiction, government, then this makes them sovereign. Which is why they teach that the Great Spirit does not exist. Please note that I stated Spirit, not spirits.

Does anyone still wonder why I use the title of honor, "Sir". A "sir" is not a slave, one rank of honor above Esquire, which most attorners and banksters hold. I prefer calling them Assquires, which they truly are. I cannot comprehend why anyone would spend twenty years of their life going to school and then spending the rest of their life being an apprentice.

I am quiet proficient with the pen and the sword, but then too, I am a squire, barrister and herald. Look those terms up in Black's Law Dictionary or Webster's. Herald is three titles of honor above Esquire and is highest honor that commoner can earn or receive. Titles of nobility are: Emperor, King, Prince, Duke, Marquis, Earl, Count and Baron. Titles of honor are Herald, Barrister, Squire, Esquire, Gentleman and Mister.

Much effort has been entered in preparing this brief and use of terms, herein, in hopes that this will spark some light at the end of very long and dark tunnel, which we have all been forced to travel through. And that it will give the reader some tools and better or much clearer ways of defeating the NWO.

Doing the same mistakes over and over expecting different results should be obvious that something is not working. Attempting to operate in Wonderland with methods that only apply or work on the other side of the Looking Glass cannot fly. Yes, you may be absolutely correct, but lack standing. Common Law arguments or issues cannot, let me repeat that, CANNOT be heard in Code and Rule Pleading Proceedings (Babylonian Law). Read Federal Civil Procedure and Rules, Rule 12(b) and Declaration in Black's Law Dictionary, 4th or 6th Editions, for better comprehension of this point. There are seven challenges to jurisdiction, lacking any of these the court lacks jurisdiction; it is that simple. One can defeat or create a case by following this rule.

Virtual devices can be used for RemoteApps, even Remote Desktop. This virtual service is not needed.

"Complete desktop environments can run in virtual machines on datacenter servers and can be accessed by end users from any PC or thin client on the corporate network. This solution provides IT with centralized control over desktop computing resources and their data as well as the ability to consolidate virtual machines and optimize resource utilization across the datacenter."

WARNING ; Not all SQL CLSIDs pose security threats!

Digital Protection is a rogue Antispyware, it cloaks itself as Antivirus software. It is a wolf in sheep'sclothing. It conducts a fake scan of your system.

The CLSID shit lists were created to help others learn to better protect their computers. As well, guides to stealth vulnerable ports and to identify malware / spyware and default threats buried inside the massive grave known as registry. Also to update past mistakes, so others can avoid from fucking up.

The best way to protect a personal computer is to have the internet disconnected, and only connect tothe internet when you desire going online.

CLSID Shitlist Series Beyond

A sends:

I've been looking at your CLSID shitlist series. It doesn't go far enough. There are lots of other places in a Windows system to look for bad action or clandestine stuff. Someone who's trying to keep a normal Windows system secure and non-invasive has to watch a lot more than just CLSIDs.

This is just a short note to say how I deal with controlling what software gets onto my system and how it behaves. To keep it short I'll omit all the usual advice about where to download software, what to download, what to permit in your browser, how to do a software installation under Windows, etc., and just say how I keep watch.

I audit software installations and behavior with software I wrote that tracks file system changes and registry changes. (My software doesn't detect rootkits, but I do check for them from time to time.)

For instance, I audit what file system and registry changes an installation makes; and also what changes the operational package makes. My software filters out things that definitely don't need my attention. (Who cares what's the last thing DirectX looked at?) What remains are things of interest.

Bad software often leaps out at me from these audits: anything that makes 30,000 registry changes and adds 8,000 files on C: is shit. I can see what's being added to run automatically, and where programs are keeping their parameters. I can often see a package's methods of surveillance over the user, and sometimes thwart them. It's clear how file associations are being created, or stolen from other software. It's visible how software is, possibly clandestinely, integrating itself into other software like browsers or mail agents.

I get an initial idea of whether a software package is "trustworthy" in a simple sense: are its use of the registry and the file system well considered? Does it install a lot of unused stuff? Does it rely heavily on proprietary underpinnings? Does it install elements with no apparent relation to what it claims to do? Does it provide access to its operational parameters? Are there signs in how it uses the file system and the registry that it was sloppily designed or carelessly coded? (A good user interface can hide many gross sins of design and execution.) Is it spying on me and my system? Does it, finally, represent a threat to the system's wellbeing?

My software tells me what, from installation and operation, a package leaves behind when it's deinstalled. (But see below.) This can then give me an idea of what the company has to hide. What footprint does the deinstallation leave behind? License files or files with nonsense names you're not supposed to recognize? Registry entries that a reinstallation can detect later? Or just crap that the designers were too ignorant, too careless, or too incompetent to remove? Those are significant signs.

And so on. There's software I'd honestly like to use if only it could be trusted; but from auditing its installation, operation, and deinstallation I can see that it can't be trusted. Too bad, but I'll live without it.

Obviously most people aren't willing to go to these lengths. I am, and that makes my system more reliable, leaner, more secure, and faster than similar hardware in most other people's hands. In my opinion, of course -- but in my work I've had my hands on a hell of a lot of systems. What I do is (also in my opinion) just good practice, even if it isn't much practiced. There are probably others doing the same kind of thing, but they sure don't talk or write about it much.

Here's the "see below" part. It's an essential part of my practices.

When my system is in an operative, stable, clean, infection-free state, I make an image snapshot. There are obvious benefits to having a trustworthy backup of the system in a useful condition, but here's one more: with that snapshot on hand I can experiment -- install software, check the audit logs, and decide if I want to proceed with it. If so, I work with it a while. If not, I may deinstall it just to audit the deinstallation, but in any case I can restore the system from the snapshot knowing that it contains no trace of the software I just tried. Making and checking my audit logs takes some time and attention, but restoring a system from an image snapshot is usually faster, and always cleaner and more reliable, than deinstalling software.

And knowing that I can restore the system to a reliable state gives me enormous peace of mind. I can't recommend too highly the cycle of

* establish a clean, stable, operative system

* make an image snapshot of it

* experiment to your heart's content, and when done ...

* restore the system from the snapshot

You're also permitted to restore the system from the snapshot if it becomes inoperative because -- just for instance, something many have seen -- a Windows update kills it stone cold dead. Or some software shows new and undesirable behavior.

One final note here, in case some noob thinks you can accomplish the same ends using Windows "System Restore": you can't. Someone who disagrees with me on this has my best wishes. He's going to need them.

Did you know that States don't have to obey unconstitutional federal laws?

Nullify Now! is a multi-city event tour focused on education and activism on a state level to say NO to unconstitutional federal “laws” – which, in reality, are not laws at all.

Virginia, Utah, Idaho, and other states are fighting the federal healthcare law. Arizona is protecting its borders. Washington State, Oklahoma, and others are fighting cap-and-trade legislation. Eight states are standing up for gun rights. Twenty-five states have effectively blocked the 2005 Real ID Act…

How? Through nullification.

Please see below for information on the next Nullify Now! event in Chattanooga, TN. For event dates and times in other major cities, please visit http://www.nullifynow.com/.

On October 23rd in Chattanooga, you are invited you to attend Nullify Now! - THE event to teach you the nuts and bolts of nullification and state sovereignty for our states. Get tickets today at this link: http://www.nullifynow.com/chattanooga/

Tickets start at just 10 bucks -- so reserve them online today!

When a state ‘nullifies’ a federal law, it is proclaiming that the law in question is void and inoperative, or 'non-effective,' within the boundaries of that state; or, in other words, not a law as far as that state is concerned. World-class speakers like Jack Hunter from the American Conservative will be on hand in Chattanooga to explain just what nullification is, and how it works – both in history and right now.

You'll learn: • How we can roll back Obamacare, cap and trade, and other unconstitutional expansions of federal power through nullification • Why the Founding Fathers believed that nullification was the “moderate middle ground,” not the road to secession • Why the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution gives the states the power to nullify unconstitutional laws • Why states – not the Supreme Court – should arbitrate disputes between the states and the federal government over the constitutionality of the federal government’s actions. As Thomas Jefferson said, there is a "rightful remedy" to the federal government's uncontrollable quest for power – it's called Nullification