Conservatives deal with facts and reach conclusions; liberals have conclusions and sell them as facts.

Kids make great targets — if you’re the Taliban

The American and world media go into a screaming frenzy whenever American or Israeli troops injure or kill a child. They do this despite the fact that such incidents are rare and, more significantly, they are aberrant: both the American and the Israeli military go out of their way to avoid injuring civilians, even if it means putting their own troops at greater risk.

The same media outlets conspicuously avoid reporting on an ugly little fact about the world’s Islamic fighters, whether those fighters are in Bali or Gaza or Indonesia or Iraq or Afghanistan, or anywhere else in the world: these fighters consider children either an integral part of the fight (whether as cover, junior fighters or propaganda instruments) or as completely irrelevant collateral damage in any fight.

The following video shows a Taliban fighter casually activating a rocket despite the fact that a child is directly in the line of fire:

In case you were worried, a worry that distinguishes you from the Taliban killer aiming at one of his own countrymen (or country-children), the child survived the bombing, American medics treated him on site, and he ended up being airlifted to America for further treatment.

Share this:

The media does this for the same reason they don’t investigate Democrat corruption or ACORn.

They don’t want to hurt their allies. This isn’t media bias, this is called an alliance of mutual interests. It isn’t ‘sympathy’, which is what the maximum people might be willingly to call it. It is active, integral, and intentional collusion.

There is no excuse about the media ‘leaning’ one way or another. They are not leaning. They’re all the way.