I would suggest overlooking his lack of long hairand see the movie for what it is. It tells a very important story that goes far beyond the length of his hair.

There are several things to bear in mind with this film:1. It's an independent film, as such it would not have the $180 million budget of a major motion picture. The keyword here is "low budget." i.e. no hairdessing staff, notime for the actor to grow his hair long. Oh and my understanding it lost a lot of money. 2. The film says a very important message, a messagethat goes far beyond how long his hair is. 3. It didn't have a major distributor, my understanding is itonly showed in one theater in the US of A, 68 theaters inthe U.K.