The Racial Makeup of US Chicanos The notion that Chicanos are either mostly White or mostly Amerindian is rejected. Modern Chicanos traditionally were mostly White with a smaller amount of Amerindian, however, they are becoming less White and more Amerindian with time. 15 pages.

The Racial Makeup of Hispanics Looks at the White-Amerindian or White-Black ratio in a number of Hispanic groups. Most cannot be characterized as pure races, as most if not all Hispanics are now mixed to some degree. 30 pages.

Modern Hunter-Gatherers in Africa and Elsewhere Pours water on the notion that modern Africans were hunter-gatherers. There were and are a few hunter-gatherers in Africa, but their numbers are small. Africans have been agriculturalists for thousands of years. 18 pages.

Berber Genes in Europeans Many Southern Europeans especially also have Berber genes. In some groups, these genes are very prominent. 11 pages.

The Purest Whites of Them All The purest Whites of them all are Jews and the people of the Caucasus. That is, they have little or no Black in them. Choke on that, Aryans. 6 pages.

Linguistics

A Reworking of Chinese Language Classification. Expands Macro-Chinese from 14 languages into 375 languages on the basis of mutual intelligibility. Praised by some of the world’s leading Sinologists (they have Wikipedia entries). 112 pages.

What Are The Hardest Languages To Learn? Analyzes 115 different languages to determine which languages are harder or easier to learn for an English language L2 learner. Rated on a scale of 1-5, easiest to hardest. 356 pages.

Mutual Intelligibility Among the Turkic Languages Praised by major Turkologists, this piece was massively expanded into a 134 page document which will be published as a chapter in an upcoming peer-reviewed book series, The Handbook of Endangered Turkic Languages. A shorter version will be published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Endangered Languages. 11 pages.

Some Scientific Intelligibility Studies It is often said, nonsensically, that intelligibility between various different lects cannot possibly be measured due to a variety of red herrings and straw men. This paper gives the lie to that notion. 11 pages.

Intelligence

Secular Rise in Black IQ and Head Size: Evidence For a Eugenic Effect US Blacks have been breeding eugenically for 100 years now, selecting preferentially for more Caucasoid and progressive features and for higher IQ’s. At the same time, Black head size has increased dramatically, and Black IQ’s have gone up tremendously. All of these phenomena are related. 13 pages.

Judaica

Literature

The Greatest Great Books List Ever, in two parts, A-M (3,319 authors and 633 pages) and N-Z (2,516 authors and 443 pages). An attempt to list the greatest books every written or translated into English from 1400-present. Emphasis on the modern era. Includes works from all of the Western canon lists, all of the classic great books lists and all of the world canon lists. An attempt was made to be as selective as possible. Includes literature, poetry, and literary criticism, along with great nonfiction works in history, philosophy, sociology, anthropology, political science, travel, biography, autobiography, art criticism, art history, etc. Extremely long; the two parts combined are 1,076 pages!

If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site.

One thing I never hear discussed is the difference between hating a race and hating a cultural or certain facets of a culture. I maintain that race is nothing or next to nothing; 99% of the DNA from one race to the next is indistinguishable. Culture is in some ways arbitrary to the degree that it represents “beliefs of convenience” anyway. Is there such a thing as a “culturalist?” Probably not catchy enough as a term. I think all cultures have flaws, but if you discuss them, you run the risk of being accused of racism, when in fact racial markers are scientifically very unimportant overall.
And cultures can, and do change, just as values change. Principles do not change however, because they by definition cannot (when contrasting their
differences. Casually, the terms are often used interchangeably which can unfortunately lead to some very sloppy thought patterns).
– Peter J

I used to subscribe to the 4 race model: Caucasoids (including South Asians & middle Easterners), Mongoloids (including Amerindians & Eskimos), Australoids (including southeast Asians) and Negroids (including bushmen & pygmies). However I have decided to merge Australoids and Negroids into a single Black race on the grounds that Australoids have genetically preserved the ancestral phenotype of black Africa, even if the two groups split apart long ago (and thus differ in non-functional selectively neutral DNA). That’s one thing the Africentrics got right.

Thus there are only 3 races: The new and improved Mongoloids, who evolved from the less evolved Caucasoids, who evolved from the ancient primitive Blacks.

“I have decided to merge Australoids and Negroids into a single Black race on the grounds that Australoids have genetically preserved the ancestral phenotype of black Africa”

If you think Australian Aborigines look ‘Nigroid’, then you need to get your eyes checked. Hell, even the negritos don’t look Negroid. And the Bushmen look more East/Southeast Asian than they do Negroid. Seriously, replace their peppercorn hair with straight hair and see what you get.

In light of decades of studies demonstrating just how difficult it is to group people into races, physically or otherwise, you seem to be going backwards.

I doubt Mongoloids evolved from australoids. Mongoloids split off from caucasoids in a superior form and then invaded australoid territory, absorbing some australoid genes, especially in southeast Asia.

This is where being an IQ fetishist will get you. Absolutely nowhere. I know the history of all of these races. Mongoloids most assuredly did not come from Caucasoids. They didn’t even breed with them. The only breeding occurred in very recent times in the Caucasoid/Mongoloid frontier regions of the Stans, Afghanistan, Northern South Asia, Nepal and surroundings, Mongolia, East Turkestan, Siberia, the Urals, Scandinavia, Hungary, Turkey and Russia.

Pure Mongoloids like the vast majority of folks in Asia have frankly ZERO Caucasoid in them, ancient or modern. This includes the Koreans, Japanese and Chinese, the Eskimos, and all of the SE Asians.

Mongoloid race is a new thing. Go back in time and all of Asia was Australoid forever. Asia was Australoid from 63,000 YBP on. Australoid-Mongoloid transition occurred in NE Asia 9,000 YBP and in SE Asia ~2-5,000 YBP.

Without a doubt extremely high IQ’s can evolve from probable low IQ bases in a very short period of time, only a few thousand years.

Far South Chinese have sky high IQ’s. 5,000 years ago, they were all a Negrito/Melanesian type. 2-5,000 YBP, they transitioned to Mongoloid, and now some of them have IQ’s ranging from 105-111.

Selection is a powerful instrument and dramatic genetic change can occur very quickly not only in lower animals but in humans as well.

This seems to be the modern mainstream consensus on the origins of the race.

Modern humans arose in East Africa around 200,000 years ago (as you probably know). It looks like there were 2 major migrations of those modern humans out of Africa and the Levant in ancient times.

Around 70,000 years ago, the ancestors of the present day Australian Aboriginals and Melanesians left Africa and travelled along the south coast of Asia. It is thought that many of the darker-skinned peoples of south Asia and South East Asia are descended from the same migration – the Australoid or “Dravidian” peoples of India, Andaman Islanders, and Negritos of SE Asia.

Around 40,000 years ago, a second group of humans migrated out of Africa, this time heading north. These are the ancestors of today’s Europeans and Asians. Europeans and west Asians are closely related genetically and are really a single group (what is sometimes called ‘Race” although that’s a controversial term), the Eurasians. Another part of the same group underwent adaptations for cold dry weather, probably somewhere on the Tibetan Plateau, around 30,000 to 20,000 years ago. These are the ancestors of the current East Asians, Siberians and indigenous Americans.

But ask yourself this, Objectivity, after situating in South and Southeast Asia for thousands of years what would stop the first wave from swinging north to Southern China, Japan, etc? Isn’t it plausible that they would migrate north? Think about all the fauna they would have been greeted with. Cold, yes, but a lot of food.

The first wave was probably already in NE Asia long ago. Japanese and Korean genes go back 105,000 YBP. I know that’s not really possible, but apparently the OOA types bred in with pre-OOA tyes (archaic Sapiens) in NE Asia. There’s no evidence that humans in NE Asia were anything but Australoids pre 9000 YBP.

All Asians were Australoids.

In the North, they went to some sort of Ainuid type (cold adapted Australoids) and in the south, we had more heat adapted Australoids like Aborigines, Papuans, Melanesians and Negritos.

Mongoloid race probably begins in NE Asia with a transition from Ainuid Australoid -> Mongoloid 9000 YBP, then probably extends south, replacing the warm adapted Australoids as the new Mongoloid peoples move into the south.

How is not that possible? If Europeans and even Asians (including East Asians) have Neanderthal elements, it’s not far fetched to think that that these early East Asians absorbed a very remote archaic Sapien group. An isolated, cold-adapted Homo Erectus population, perhaps?

Also, I will reiterate by belief that some Negritos types in the South migrated to the North, became cold-adapted and then mixed with the Ainuid and, possibly, pre-Sapien types.

There is a very famous cave in North China with skulls going back many 1000’s of years. The name escapes me now. I think it starts with a Z. The finds are called Z1, Z2, etc. Zhounjian or something.

According to the finds from that cave, North Chinese skulls look Australoid until 9000 YBP, and only then does the Mongoloid race first appear.

Understand that all the races are new. The modern European Caucasoid race goes back only 11,000 YBP. Before that, they look like Arabs, and if you go back ~22,000 YBP, they look like Amerindians from NW North America (they most resemble the Makah Indians of Washington State).

ALL THE RACES ARE NEW.

When we go back in time, we are *talking about races that don’t even exist anymore.*

Car Guy, you are probably correct. The Asian race was birthed in northern Vietnam and southern China 53,000 YBP. No one knows what those folks looked like back then, but they may have looked like Negritos. The general consensus is that the proto-Asians birthed here in northern Tonkin then spread out in many directions, in particular to the north, where they apparently become the NE Asians.

Surely they must have mixed in with some archaic Sapiens types who were already up in that area 100,000 YBP. Check out the Red Deer Cave People.

It’s an interesting theory that mongoloids are just cold adapted australoids, and caucasoids are just cold adapted negroids, however the former is probably not true. Even if north china was australoid 10,000 years ago, then doesn’t prove they evolved into Mongoloids. Why would such an extreme cold adapted phenotype evolve so rapidly just when the ice age was ending? More likely, there were non-white caucasoids living in eurasia. Some of them went to northern Europe and evolved into whites. Others went to northeast Asia and evolved into an entirely new race: Mongoloids. The Mongoloids then headed to northern china where they found australoids who were camped out because the end of the ice age made it possible for them to live there, but the Mongoloids (who had their wits sharpened by the last ice age) were so superior they exterminated or chased all the australoids away.

We know that Mongoloids evolved before the last ice age ended because they’re the most cold adapted phenotype and because both native Americans and East Asians are mongoloid despite splitting apart over 12,000 years ago. Obviously the mongoloid ancestor that gave rise to both of these populations predated this split.

If you look at a genetic tree, it shows that the first split was between negroids and non-negroids. Then among the non-negroids, the next split was between australoids (first wave out of Africa ) and Eurasians (second wave out of Africa ). Finally the Eurasians split into 2 different races: caucasoids and mongoloids:

There were no non-White Caucasoids in Asia 9000 YBP. In fact, no one even knows what non-White Caucasoid looked liked 9000 YBP. The Caucasoid race as we know it doesn’t even go back very far. If you go back 20,000 YBP, “Caucasoids” look like Amerindians!

The birth of the Caucasian race occurs in the Caucasus, with various movements back and forth between India, North Africa, the Caucasus and Europe over the last 40-45,000 YBP. In particular, the Caucasus, the Middle East, North Africa and India have been the birthing grounds of the Caucasians.

The Mongoloid race as we know it by skulls only appears at 9000 YBP. Before that, they look like Aborigines, maybe like Ainuids.

The first caucasoid skull appears about 30,000 years in the Czec Republic.

And the first mongoloid skull appears about 10,000 years ago in the Americas.

Negroids are an extremely old race and thus are superior on primitive traits like testosterone, aggression, genitalia, breasts and buttocks, and personality. Mongolids are the new and improved race, and thus are superior on advanced traits like brain size, intelligence, law abidingness and mental stability. Caucasoids are just the missing link, an intermediate stage of evolution between the sexual athletic negroids and the intellectual nerdy mongoloids.

Mongoloids are descended from caucasoids who crossed over to the Americas and experienced extreme cold. Amerindians are the first mongolids which is why they are the mongolids with the lowest IQ and who most resemble caucasoids. As the mongoloids became more advanced, they spread out to East Asia.

Robert, idaltu is not a different species; it’s not even a different subspecies, it’s an anatomically modern human just like us. The reconstruction clearly shows it has the Negroid phenotype: dark skin, broad nose, big lips, wooly hair, well defined muscles. And actually there were even older anatomically modern human remains from 195,000 years ago that were probably Negroid too. Basically all humans were Negroid until about 40,000 years ago, but by 35,000 years ago, mulatto looking people started appearing in Eurasia. They weren’t real mulattoes but they looked like them because they were negroids slowly evolving into caucasoids:

https://robertlindsay.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/first-european.jpg

By 30,000 years ago they were fully Caucasoid. The world was nothing but negroids (including australoids) and caucasoids until about 10,000 years ago when Caucasoids finally began evolving into Mongoloids in North America.

Australoid skulls plot similar to Black skulls, but they are definitely different, but you can see how they plot differently on a skull chart. There’s no overlap.

Ainuids and Aborigines are for sure part of a new race from Africans. Personally, I feel Tamil type South Asians are too. Those people look nothing at all like Black folks. They look like Australian aborigines!

Melanesian — the people shown the in photos linked to — are just one subset of ‘Australoid’. Yes, they may be the most Negroid-looking people of the bunch, but even they have their own distinct look, as if they were a mix between Negroid and Caucasoid, although they are not.

Personally, I could tell a Melanesian from a full Negroid any day or time. It helps that their isolation and inbreeding make them all look almost alike.

That said, Australian Aborigines and most of the Negrito groups (minus features such as dark skin and curly or nappy hair) look very little like Negroid. They’re also part of the great, very confusing and complex Australoid race.

Well perhaps they look like a mix between Negroid and Caucasoid because both modern Negroids and Caucasoids evolved from archaic Negroids, and australoids are just archaic Negroids. Yes many australoids are easily distinguishable from sub-Saharan Africans but native Americans look different from East Asians yet both are still Mongoloid. Nordics look different from Arabs yet both are Caucasoid. There’s enormous diversity within the 3 macro races.

“Ainuids and Aborigines are for sure part of a new race from Africans. Personally, I feel Tamil type South Asians are too. Those people look nothing at all like Black folks. They look like Australian aborigines!

I’m with you on that. I have always contended that Australian Aborigines should be a race of their own. The Ainu are just cold-adapted Australian Aborigines.

“…but native Americans look different from East Asians yet both are still Mongoloid. Nordics look different from Arabs yet both are Caucasoid. There’s enormous diversity within the 3 macro races.”

I get your point, but Inuits/Eskimos and Amerindians don’t look that different from East Asians. However, some Native Americans look like they are mixed with something else.There is speculation that they could be proto-mongoloid, possibly Ainuid. But many of them look very Mongoloid. Also, with all three group, there is no debating where they came from.

Arabs are tied to the greater Caucasian race both physically and genetically. Not only do Australian Aborigines not look like black Africans, they’re not even related to them genetically.

Exactly how would that work, it would take a ridivilous amount of dna additions to achieve that. Or maybe memory is passef down in some other molecule, but wouldnt it increase exponentially w each passing generation? How would that be possible

I just looked it up. An engram is a (hypothetical) storage for memory. You said you (maybe) believed in it, which i take you are either still researching it, or you believe in the validity of such a theoRy, but believe it is underdeveloped. Can you explain your curremt knowledge of it?

Yeah, thats what i thought. Although if it was true, it would explain a lot of things, like why black males crave big asses, why white people develope complex systems of government, why asians are sumbissive to whites but not to blacks, who are physically much more robust than whites, etc. Of course,
all these things could be genetic, but the fact that it is universal sheds doubt on that. For example, how did the Mongols, with only 14% white, shed their submissiveness and massacre shitloads of Caucasoids?

Maybe if the racial memory of a full white ancestor was passed on to them, and the asian memories sumbitted to it, maybe the mongls had the fighting vigor of a full white and defeated all white populations.

What i meant was, maybe each ancestor donate a portion of their genes, but their full memories. So sice asian memories are sumbissive to white ones, the memories of their white ancestors completely took over the mongols.

What i meant was if each ancestor donates their full memory to the offspring, then the most dominant ones will express itself. I am 21 yrs old. I sound younger because of my low iq. Alfo i make no sense because i f

For example i believe the Starchild skull isnt fully human. I dont believe its ET, but a more divergent line of human. Skeptics say its hydrocephaly, but the skull shows normal suture, and hydro would cause wide sutures.

Oh and i made it sound as if i was pure blood black. Sorry, i lied about that too. I am black on my fathers side and white on my mothers side. I currently live w her cuz the courts took me away from dad. I am a 9th grader. My dad was the one who mentally pushed me, but mom is the genius. I stay high, drunk, and drugged up, and add that to my predisposition to schizo, thats why i sound wierd.

By the way, Robert, what do you figure is the iq average for posters on this site? I know a lot of people here have a extensive knowledge of human haplogroups, anthropology, demographics, etc. How many average ppl know this? Maybe this site contains a bottleneck of high iq ppl. Of course, dumbasses troll here too, and hopefully they say something worthy of their iq and get banned.

By the way Robert, in addition to being 15 and mulatto, i will admit one more thing. Former Self Hating Ginger was me posting on my school computer using a fake email address. Since i forgot that email address, i will prove my validity another way. You got three posters named Eminem, Busta Rhymes, and Robert Lindsay II who sumbitted some shitty raps from the same ip address. That was me too. I am really sorry for deceiving you guys. You too, Swedish shit.

I thought this was about Henry Louis Wallace…where is the site for this? There is a national true crime syndicate that is doing an episode on him…to be released in the first quarter of 2014…where am I here…I want to only converse with HLW bloggers.

No source is going to prove that they have the most advanced phenotype. I just say they do because it’s common sense if you look at them. There is a lot of data on Chinese, Koreans, Japanese and Vietnamese IQ.

Are the Neomongoloids the most advanced phenotypical race is it because they are the least Australoid looking compared to Caucasoids, Paleomongoloids, Negroids, etc(having larger eyes, more protruded browridge, wider nose and lips, etc)?

No, the lack of body hair, the small size, the high intelligence, the low aggression, the neoteny, the lack of a strong difference between the sexes, the late maturation, the calm, cool, and collected babies, the low extroversion and high introversion, all of these would imply that they are the most advanced race. This is probably what humans would look like as they get more and more advanced.