tribeofjudah wrote:I would vote for a man who could show improvements overall in our Gov over the last 4 years.

So, did you vote for Bush in his second term? Clinton? I doubt you're old enough to have voted for HW Bush for a second term.

wrong....I don't vote. So call me unpatriotic.

They are all crooks, in bed with the illuminati. Just hope the lesser evil gets the vote.

So if you believe that, then how is Obama the lesser of two evils? I mean, they are both doing the Illuminati's bidding, so how can one be worse than the other? BTW, I happen to agree that the fix is in, but I still vote, just so they hear my voice raging against the machine.

tribeofjudah wrote:I would vote for a man who could show improvements overall in our Gov over the last 4 years.

So, did you vote for Bush in his second term? Clinton? I doubt you're old enough to have voted for HW Bush for a second term.

wrong....I don't vote. So call me unpatriotic.

They are all crooks, in bed with the illuminati. Just hope the lesser evil gets the vote.

So if you believe that, then how is Obama the lesser of two evils? I mean, they are both doing the Illuminati's bidding, so how can one be worse than the other? BTW, I happen to agree that the fix is in, but I still vote, just so they hear my voice raging against the machine.

Cappster wrote:The last two years he's been stuck with an obstructionists congress. Nonetheless, you pretty much side stepped the question: Would you vote for a Muslim candidate?

Can you give any example of anything Obama has proposed other than more government control?

Proposing a tax cut for a working man implies less government control over his gross earnings. There are many more. They get fillibustered like everything else. Repubes want to control my personal life.

Ever hear this one?

"Obama has added more to our debt than almost all other presidents combined."

Guess what - here are the changes (growth) in debt by percentage since Ford:

Carter - 42% (times 2 would be84%)

Reagan - 188.6% (2 terms)

Bush I - 55.6% (times 2 would be 111.2%)

Clinton - 35.6% (2 terms!!!)

Bush II - 89% (2 terms)

Obama - 41.4% (times 2 would be 82.8%)

It could be said about every president but ...

Dems do better than Repubes! Repubes are fiscally conservative ... at least in theory!!!! :ROTFALMAO:

Reagan jizzed all over the world. Clinton was awesome and handed Bush II keys to a well-oiled machine. He took only a few months to turn surplus into deficit. He jizzed ala Reagan and handed off a disaster. Growth rate Bush II handed off was 15.9% annual. Obama has lowered that growth rate to 15.1%, 13.9%, 7.8%, and 4.8%. Repubes have opposed him AT EVERY TURN. No wonder Romney could "reach across the aisle." He's reaching to Dems! Repubes in Senate couldn't care less about progress. They have flat out said they'd oppose Obama on everything - even stuff they wanted before he took office.

Obama passed stem cell research bill that allowed Americans to enjoy the advantages of stem cell advances instead of going to second rate facilities in countries like Mexico and hoping the procedure was done correctly..

Lmao! What a tool..
Obama pwned him from the get go.
College kid asks what they would do to help him and other grads get a good job after college.
Romney say a bunch of words but not one thing about what he would do, or how.
Obama gave him five DIRECT answers to what he proposed to do.

Seriously tho, they need to get a hold on these debates. It's like watching the scab refs try to manage a game #epicfail