“We Will Now All Be Unwilling Participants in a Social Experiment That Will Undoubtedly Place Canadian Lives at Risk”

It is regrettable that we, as a nation, are about to embark on an unwelcome social experiment. The Conservative government has been very clear that they intend to finally abolish the gun registry. This is regrettable in so far as it is clear to Canada’s emergency physicians that the gun registry has, in fact, worked and the number of deaths from inappropriate firearms use has dropped dramatically since the institution of the Firearms Act. The government has consistently portrayed this act as a victimization of rural long gun owners, conveniently ignoring the clear scientific evidence that rural suicides with long guns are the principal issue in the tragic toll of Canadian firearms deaths. So we will now all be unwilling participants in a social experiment that will undoubtedly place Canadian lives at risk. Our question to our government is that relative to the perceived inconvenience and cost of registration, what will be the true cost, in direct human suffering, of their ideologically driven and scientifically bankrupt legislation.

Homicide by firearm

Firearm homicides, 2009: 179 (0.53 per 100 000 or about 30% of all homicides)

Firearm homicides, 1991 (the year stricter gun control was introduced):271 (0.97 per 100 000 people)

Types of firearms homicides, 2009:

Rifles or shotguns: 18% (36% in 1999)

Handguns: 69%

Prohibited firearms: 13%

Since 1995, when the gun registry became law, until 2009, the reduction in homicides by long guns: 52%

Spousal homicides caused by shootings, 2000-2009: 167 (23%)

Reduction in the rate for spousal homicides involving firearms from 1980 to 2009: -74% from nearly 3 per million spouses in 1980 to less than 1 per million spouses in 2009, according to Statistics Canada

Share of firearm-related spousal homicides involving a long gun: 50%(The rate of long-gun spousal suicides dropped about 80% between 1983 and 2009.)

Share of family-related homicides of children and youth (7 to 17 years), by shooting, 2000-2009: 26%

Of the last 18 police officers killed in the line of duty, as of August 2010, number killed by long guns: 14 (78%)

Suicide by firearm

Number of firearm-related suicides involving a long-gun, 2004: 475 ( 5.4 times the number of suicides with handguns)

Change in number of firearm-related suicides since the introduction of stricter gun laws in 1991 (as of 2009): -43%

Change in number of firearm-related suicides since the introduction of the Firearms Act in 1995 (as of 2009): -23%

Increased likelihood that a home where there are firearms is the scene of a suicide, than a home without a gun: 4.8 times (based on a 1992 U.S. study in the New England Journal of Medicine)

Incidentally, for you fiscal conservative types, the cost of treating a gunshot victim is about $450,000.

So, on one side of the debate, we have scientific and statistical evidence on the efficacy of the gun registry, expert opinion from health care professionals and the police, the physical and emotional cost of trauma, hundreds of deaths prevented and, on the other side, the hurt feelings of rifle owners. That’s pretty well what it boils down to, right?

I believe that this is what the ProCon voting base wants so, to stay in power, SH will give it to them. For him, it’s not about what is right or wrong (in the short or long term). It’s all about retaining POWER and having Canada resemble (more and more) his much worshiped US of A, even to the point of duplicating their failed policies.