Sunday, January 15, 2012

Blacks Who Lynched Blacks -- Truth Behind American Lynchings

Note: *Partial list of Negroes who were lynched, and why they were lynched... >>>LINK* Partial list of white people victimized in inter-racial violence 1882 - 1964 >>>LINK

----------------

The Lynching MythsLet's begin here by addressing a few myths regarding lynching incidents involving American Negroes (1882 to 1960). Myth I:Prior to the Voting Rights Act (1965), it was very common, particularly in the South, for White people to round up Black men who tried to vote … and LYNCH them. Not true. Didn’t happen. I cannot find ONE verifiable newspaper account of such an event. Perhaps one or maybe even a few incidents did occur. If so, it/they likely happened during the Reconstruction years (1865 to 1878). Of further note, in 1963, two years before the passage of the Voting Rights Act,43% of all eligible Blacks in the South were registered to vote. And if that percent seems low, remember, this was two years prior to LBJ’s launching of his Great Society socialist programs i.e. most blacks believed they had little reason to go to the polls and vote prior to 1963 , since – the way they saw it – there were no gov’t rewards for doing so. There were voting "irregularities" mainly in Mississippi and Texas. (SOURCE:Chronological History Of The Negro -- year 1963)Myth II:More Blacks were lynched in the South because that's where most of the racist White people lived. Not true. There was without question a determined effort in the South among White people to have the Black race live separately. However, there was, prior to 1964, nothing illegal or even immoral in this desire. Nor was it an act of racism. One distinct people living separate from another distinct people was not just the norm in American history (up until 1964) but human history as well. Regarding lynching... When a White person was attacked (rape or murder) and the perpetrator was Black, this was seen as an attack on "the group" and White people responded more often than not with uncharacteristic ferocity. Blacks were rarely ever assaulted (rape or murder) by a White person in the South. 99.9% of the cases I have found where violence crossed racial lines, it was Black- on-White ... and the result was a raging and maddened mob out for revenge. These were the times in which they lived. The vast number of attacks by Blacks on innocent southern White people, including rape, in this type of atmosphere, boggles my mind. Again, the lynching of Blacks in the South was not about racism. It was seen as a necessary response at that time for a criminal act (usually rape or murder). Here's another point to consider. If racism drove White people in the South to lynch the Black man...then why was lynching dying out in the late 1920s? (in 1929 8 Blacks were lynched; 1935 - 18 blacks lynched ; 8 Blacks lynched in 1936 ; 8 Blacks lynched in 1937; 6 Blacks lynched in 1938; 2 Backs lynched in 1939 -- no one knows how many of these Blacks were lynched by fellow Blacks). Didn't civil-rights activists in the 60s refer to the South as "the hotbed of racism"? So why did lynching die out in the so-called racist South? Maybe Black-on-White violence dissipated to almost nothing starting in the late 1920s? Hmm. I doubt it. I believe lynching died out for two main reasons: 1) It lost its manly appeal - the feeling that it was every man's responsibility to enforce the law and not just the sheriff; 2) It FAILED to stop the black males' predatory assaults on white females/ males and law enforcement officers. Myth III:White people lynched 3,446 Negroes between 1882 and 1968. Not true.First, the lynch figure for Blacks has been reduced downward to around 3000 (LINK pg#9). Second, there is no way of knowing precisely how many of the lynched Blacks were lynched by fellow Blacks. No question about it though, White males were ready to lynch a Black male (or even a black female) for any murder, rape or sexual assault of any kind perpetrated against a White person. Those were the times in which they lived. Blacks were fully aware what crimes could provoke a lynching. After all, Blacks were lynching Blacks for the very SAME crimes. NOTE: The lynching figure for Blacks would be much, much, much higher, if not for White law enforcement protecting them from raging mobs. - LINK(note the reasons cited for the lynchings)

MYTH IVBlacks were so terrorized by racist white southerners they acted sheepish and frightened around them... never knowing if they'd be lynched for no reason whatsoever. Not true. Here are a few examples of black behavior in the early 1900s toward white people.1. Atlanta, GA. - 1900: Black male bully sat on a white male's lap while riding a on street car, deliberately trying to humiliate and antagonize him. A fight ensued and the black male pulled a concealed gun and gunned down the young white male. Oh, and in the state of Georgia in 1900, the color-line mandate was not being enforced, so blacks could sit where they pleased.lLink2.Shreveport, La. - 1901: Black Supremacist organization advocated violence against white people. One white male was murdered. Link3. Columbus, Ga. - 1900: Negro crawled into the bedroom of young white girlthru an open window and attempted to rape her. Link

4. Columbus, Mo. 1901 - Negro raped his employer's wife...then shot her in the headBrother-in-law of murder victim: "I want to speak to him, how many times we cared for him and how kind Mary was to him, and ask him why he killed her. Then, when he has answered that, I want to see him burned." Link5. Tuscumbia, Ala. - 1901: It's a MASSACRE - Negro petty criminal ambushed sheriff and deputy and murdered both - he then gunned down seven more white males - four dead. Link (note: the death count was later revised)6. Dublin, Ga. -1908: Two Negro employees invaded the home of their [white] employer, beat him senseless with an ax, gang raped his wife ... then slashed her to pieces demanding to know the whereabouts of household money Link7. Satton, W.Va. - 1908: Home Invasion By Negroes - White male homeowner was tied to a tree then whipped -- negroes then gang raped his wife (no, I'm not kidding)Link8. Hot Springs Ark. - 1908: Negro cook decides he gonna have a little fun with hungry young white male - taunts him with food offer - makes him work in the blazing heat until he can't work any longer... Negro then guns him down. Link 9.Eufala, Ala. 1911: Prominent American woman was stalked by a negro sexual predator as she walked from a neighbor's home to her home. The negro finally grabbed her and wrestled her to the ground. As the negro started to tear her clothes off ... to rape her... her desperate screams for help saved her. White males quickly came to her rescue.Link10. Stephensport, Ky. - 1904: Negroes "Lynch" Young White Male - If Emmit Till murder was a "lynching" than this one should also be judged a lynching as well. Two negro brothers went after a young white male who , their sister claimed, "insulted her". When they found the young white male ... they slit his throat from ear to ear. sourceAre you now convinced you've been lied to about Black behavior toward White people in the early 1900s? Or would you like to read more than a thousand other incidents? LINK

-------------------------------------

In America between 1882 and 1968 there were three recognized legitimate sources for lynching data:: Chicago Tribune, Tuskegee Institute and the NAACP. The criteria for a "lynching" (created by the NAACP) requires that four conditions exist : (1) there must be evidence that a person was killed; (2) the person must have met death illegally; (3) a group of three or more persons must have participated in the killings (to rule out personal vendettas, etc.); and (4) the group must have acted under the pretext of protecting justice or tradition. Chicago Tribune began its lynching data in 1882; Tuskegee in 1892; NAACP sometime after 1913.

Note: When you see a reason cited for the lynching on any link, remember this:: When a Black man was found dangling (lynched) by White people, there was obviously no information available to accurately establish a reason for the lynching. So what would the person at Tuskegee (or the Tribune or the NAACP) do for citing a reason for the lynching? Well, he could easily manufacture a reason. There was no law against this practice. So when you come across preposterous reasons for Blacks being lynched, like "Acting suspiciously", "Quarreling", "Insulting a White man" , "Trying to vote", etc., don't believe it unless there is a verifiable source ( e.g. newspaper article) and the name of the Negro is given along with the cited reason for the lynching. Also, citing a fictitious reason like "quarreling" has another intended and insidious purpose::It implies that 'barbaric' White people did the lynching. Right?

By the way...would you like to see the most ridiculous reason - IMO - ever for lynching someone? How about this one (negroes lynch a negro) >>LINK
-------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------
We'll now look at some examples of Negroes lynching Negroes.

-------------------------------------------------

1.

Lynched by Negroes; Four blacks -- unknown identities and unknown reason for being lynched

Another example of Negroes lynching a Negro --unknown person and unknown offense (circa 1955) - and found dangling by local white people. A white male rushed home to get his camera to snap this pic before authorities could remove the body. Police also believed suicide was a possibility in this one, since the Negro's hands were not tied.

Here is a black man found dangling by white people. The tell-tale sign Negroes lynched him is that there is no identity given for the Negro ... and no reason given for the lynching i.e. his purported crime.

In this postcard we have four young black males clearly lynched. However, it was falsely claimed (deliberately by white people) on the postcard that white people hung these black males for a gang rape of a white female in Georgia. The reason for making the false claim was likely to intimidate would-be Negro rapists from attacking white females. These blacks were actually hung in Kentucky by fellow blacks in 1908(?), most likely for a murder or gang rape of a Negro.Note: Could be white male vigilantes hung these four (possible names: John Jones, Virgil Jones, John Boyer, Joe Riley). The four were implicated in the murder of a white male

----------

The Negro rapist was a constant menace to the Americans and Negroes. Here we have another unknown Negro found by white people, who was lynched and riddled with bullets by fellow Negroes. Had this Negro raped and/or murdered a white person, white males would have gathered by the dozens, or hundreds, his name would be known to the local press, and a picture would have been taken immediately after the lynching depicting all the proud [white] participants. Also, note how the black male is holding his groin area, indicating he was protecting that area when shot. This tells us that this Negro was most likely a rapist and the Negro shooters were deliberately shooting at his groin. Pic is circa 1915 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note how this unknown Negro is hung by two chains pieced together. This man, found dangling by white people, was obviously lynched by poor blacks who didn't have a rope. If you enlarge the photo you can see what a haphazard and clumsy job the lynchers did tying the chains together. One can only imagine how long this Negro had to wait while his [black] lynchers tried to figure out a way to fasten the two chains together. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The scarred Negroabove was a slave most likely owned by one of the largest slaveholders in the state of Louisiana, a Negro woman named C. Richards (he wondered into a Union army camp not far from her plantation). The widowed Negro, along with her son, P.C. Richards, owned a large - and very profitable - Louisiana sugar plantation and had a stable of 152 Negro slaves. There was a story circulated which claims that this slave, who went by the name of Gordon, was whipped because he was a runaway. But no evidence exists to substantiate this "story." It could also be that Gordon committed a very serious crime (most likely against a fellow Negro) for which he was punished. Gordon escaped from his master in the spring of 1863 and, after a ten day journey, found sanctuary among [white] Union troops.

Note: If the scars on Gordon's back did come from a whip, the most likely perpetrator would be the Negro overseer (slave-driver). There is also a claim that Gordon was in the service of the US Army 'colored' regiment, however, no record exists to substantiate this claim. Highly unlikely this Negro would flee the slavery of one place (a plantation) and volunteer for de facto slavery in another (US Army). Gorgon could very likely have been a lazy Negro who not only didn't like to work but also didn't like taking orders. Gordon's actual whereabouts after this pic was taken are unknown. And one finale observation. Gordon's back scars, which look like they've healed many , many, many years prior to the photo, could also be from (indeed, looks very likely) a burn injury. Perhaps thru an accident some hot grease or water spilled on him when he was a young lad. Of course, there would be NO story for Harper's Weekly magazine if that version was reported. http://click.si.edu/Image.aspx?image=796&story=297&back=Story

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1882 - KyNegroes Haul Negro Child Rapist Out Of Jail...Then Hang HimNegro Rapist:Wm. Rittersource----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1899 - Leesburg, Ga.Negro Who Captured Three Negro Rapists Of A White Woman... Gets The Ire Of His Fellow Negroes And They Gun Him DownNegro VictimAlf ThurmanNote: The three negro rapists were later lynched by white males.source------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1900 - Dunelon, Fla.Negroes Take Care Of Business - Lynch Two Negro Men Who Murdered Fellow Negrosource------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1900 -Tutewiler, Miss.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1901 - Columbia, Mo.Prominent Negro Is Murdered By Fellow Negro - Negro Mob Action For A Lynching ThreatensNegro MurdererJohn SmartNegro VictimZeke CrosswhiteNote: Had the negro murderer not made it to the white sheriff...most likely he would have been lynched. And no one would've known his name.source------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1901 - Quitman, Ga.Negroes Lynch (gunned down) Negro Sexual Predator Being Taken Into CustodyNote: No name given for the negro. Seems the white law enforcement officers hadn't had time to record his name before the negro mob got to him. source------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1901 - Mouton, Ala.

Note: The negro child rapist, John Ruffin, 16, it seems was able to make it to the white sheriff and thereby escape a lynching at the hands of his own people. Had he not made it to the white sheriff Ruffin would have become just another unidentified hanging black man. source ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1903 - Shreveport, La.

Mob Of Negroes Seize Negro Murderer From White Sheriff - Lynch Him

A vicious Negro that went by the name of Joseph Craddock, committed one of the most gruesome and horrendous massacres Shreveport, La. had ever witnessed. Three Negroes were murdered - by ax - and one seriously wounded but survived. Either the sheriff made the arrest of the Negro or he walked over to the sheriff and offered himself up for arrest. Either way, a large mob of Negroes gathered at the jail and demanded the fiend be handed over to them. The sheriff, believing it was a "Negro matter", let the Negroes haul the murderer out of his jail. He was taken to the outskirts of town and there lynched.

Negro High-Tales It To White Sheriff To Protect Him ...From His Own People After He Murders Fellow Black Man

Negro MurdererDan Perkins

Note: Had the black man NOT made it to the white sheriff he would have most assuredly been lynched ... and then become just another hanging black man - which would have been attributed to white people.source--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1903 - St. Louis, Mo

Negro's Sexual Assault Against 10-Year-Old Results In Negro Mob Storming Jail - White Sheriff Though Had Already Whisked Negro Perp To Another County

White Sheriff And His Deputies Risk Their Lives To Save Negro Murderer From Raging Negro Mob

Note: The Negro had killed his wife which for unknown reason(s) caused a riotous mood upon the local Negro community. The Negro was successfully saved from his own people by the sheriff ... and spared a lynching.source--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1903 - St. Louis, MO

Note: The only reason white newspapers found out about this black lynching...was because the negro female reported the incident to the police and arrests were made. Had the negro female not gone to the police, the black man would have become just another lynched black man, assumed lynched by "white caps" ie. KKK.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1905 - Atlanta, Ga.Negroes - Over 500 - Attempt To Lynch White Male - Police Arrive In Nick Of Time - Turns out He Wasn't The One Who Attempted To Sexual Assault A 6-Year-Old Negro Girlsource--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1905 - Chicago, Ill.White Police Officers Save Negro From Lynching By Negro Mob - Murdered A FemaleNegro MurdererRobert Newcombsource---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1905 - Boyle, Miss.

Note: Seems a rather petty crime here to lynch someone. One has to wonder how many other petty crimes for which negroes lynched a fellow negro. It should also be noted that the only way the negro's name is known here is because he most likely came into the possession of the white sheriff and his name was recorded. The article seems to imply that was case.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1908 - Wybark, Okla. Negro Mob Demands Negro Horse Thief From White Sheriff ... So They Can Lynch Him - Sheriff Holds Them Off With Single RevolverNegro ThiefArthur MannyNote: No one should doubt the ONLY reason the negro mob backed off from the lone sheriff was out of fear from white male retaliation if they killed the sheriff.source----------------------------------------------------------

1908 - Glen Flora, Tx.

Negro Rapes Young Negro Girl - Mob Seizes Him from Sheriff... And Then Lynches Him

Between January 1911 and April 1912, Negro male(s) lynched / murdered 49 mulatto people, or families with mulattoes in them, in Texas and Louisiana. At this time in American history, it is the largest - by far - for racial hate killings. And it was all perpetrated by a Negro (or Negroes) because he/ they didn't like the color of the person. SOURCE

**No name given for negro or his victim, nor motive for the murder.source--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1912 - Cedar Crosssing Ga.

Negro Gave His Wife Strict Order NOT to Attend Church She Did Anyway - Negro Husband Marched Over To The Church, Dragged Her Out...Then Over To A Butcher Shop...Then Chopped Her Head Off - Negro Mob & White People As Well Gathered For a Lynching ...But Sheriff Intervened

1914 - Clarksville, Tenn.Negro Mob Lynches White Male For Sexual Assault On 12-Year-Old Negro Girl - Coroner's Jury Refers To Lynching As "Justifiable Homicide"Lynch Victim (white male)Lee Varner, 17sourcesourceApparently, the young white male wasn't even given a single moment to defend himslef from a child's accusation. Given the fact that this type of crime on a child was virtually non-existent among white males and the victim being black...it seems to me the white male should have been given a chance to answer his accuser.

1000s Of Whites & Blacks Gather In Festive Mood To Watch Two Negro Demons Get Lynched - Negro Demons Even Ask Women To Sing Gay Hymns For Them

Note: Names of the lynched were not given; nor were their victims names given. Most likely, these Negroes committed their heinous crimes against fellow Negroes.source-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1916 - Rosewll, NMNegro Women Lynch Negro Female For Sending Her 7-Year-Old Negro Child To Have Sex With A Negro Male (The Negro Female was Saved From The Lynching Because The Tree Branch Broke...And The Lynchers Thought White Law Officers Were Approaching)Source--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1916 - S. CarolinaNegro Barely Escapes Negro Lynch Mob- Raped A Negro FemaleNegro Arrested:Will Youngsource

Note: The sheriff and his deputy chased the Negro and received superficial wounds in a gun battle. No racial identity was given for the mob responsible for the lynching, however,since the only murdered person was a Negro, stands to reason the mob was most likely black.

Note: No Other Information available. source---------------------------------------------------------1921 - Clyde Ga.Negro Preacher Intervenes As Negroes Are About To Lynch Negro Who Raped A Young Negro Girl - Negroes Overcome With Religious Spirit March Negro Perp To White SheriffNegro Rapist:Israel Waters (tried in court and sentenced to death)source---------------------------------------------------------1922 - Okla.Hundreds Of Negroes Descend On County Jail And Attempt To Seize Negro Murderer Of 12-Year-Old ChildNegro Murderer:Levy Webster, 49 (saved from a lynching by white sheriff and his deputies)source---------------------------------------------------------1922 - Baltimore, MD

South Carolina Lynching Law ... Exposes Blacks As The Major Perpetrators Of Lynching In The State

A tough anti-lynching law, passed at the insistence of white males in 1951, after the lynching of a black male murderer of a white taxi driver, has revealed that blacks have been the racial group responsible for the vast majority of lynchings in the state -- Blacks have been arrested for 67% of all the lynching since 1952.

Shocked? Honestly, I am not at all shocked. Blacks have been the major source of violence in America since they began their migration to the Anglo-created urban centers beginning in circa 1900. I have documented this violenceHERE

It was a common practice to make postcards out of the lynchings so many of them are well documented....whites would assemble at these murders without fear of before tried...many were arrested for the participation but were always released or acquitted. Why didnt you add that bit of info.

Rewriting history does not work with the Almighty. Many southern whites have a special place in hell. Yes,every "race" has done inhumane things to one another. However, nothing compares to the evils that a disproportionate number whites have done. I am sure they will soon say the Native Americans gave themselves diseases, polluted and raped the earth,an are responsible for the trail of tears.

>>>"However, nothing compares to the evils that a disproportionate number whites have done."Blacks attempting to re-write history is part of the Black Supremacy Doctrine. It was actually blacks who provoke ALL the violence by attacking (raping/ murdering) white children, white women, white law enforcement officers. SICK stuff by the American Negro. WHY DID American white males EVER allow forced integration with this breed ?

Here's what white people endured from the biggest predatory, supremacist bully race on earth:http://theinjusticefile.blogspot.com/2011/03/african-american-atrocities-from-1900.html

" However, nothing compares to the evils that a disproportionate number whites have done.Lying black filth... Now just who was it that got down on their knees - IN THE SOUTH - and BEGGED for their INTEGRATION? What race sent their children into white schools..claiming they wanted their little kids to get the best schoolin'...and that integration with white people was the source of their dignity, freedom and even their very manhood? Why of course, it was the American NEGRO. What race of people don't build their own home in America? The American negro. What race , when they get enough $$$ ...all of them REFUSE to live among their own people, and high-tail it into a white community...and there they DUMP themselves? Again, it's the American negro! So why would a people 'struggle' so hard, and for so long...just to get integration with such an EVIL people? Make sense? The American negro never will answer this? Why would this race high-tail it OUT of their own communities to live among evil white people? NO ANSWER TO THIS ONE EITHER. Blacks continue to make up lies about white people...to attempt to cover all their EVIL they've perpetrated against innocent white people. White people MUST separate from this violence-prone race. Blacks will DESTROY everything white males built if these monstrous civil rights laws (forced integration)continue to exist.

This dude makes VERY good sense. No blacks wouldn't march a black criminal to a white sheriff. Cmon. Look at all the crimes blacks commit today! They were no angles back in those days either. But unlike today where so many of the black man's crimes are committed against whites, back then his crimes were committed almost all against his own people. Very logical. I like this site and gave it a plus on google. Thanks for sharing

I guess for some of us who are very old now and grew up in the south must have been dreaming when we saw these things.It's very sad that you can be so sure you know what you are talking about when you have not lived it. Or seen it first hand.I feel very sorry for you.

Excellent work! Notice that none of your critics has any EVIDENCE to offer to support their claims that you are "rewriting history." They just call you names and tell you that they want to attack you. Their side has not facts, only lies and insults.

This 'website' is the most absurd thing I have read in a long time, absolutely ridiculous! I don't know where your 'true/not true' statements have come from, maybe from a planet with flying pigs, and I'm not quite sure of the point you're trying to make.........It seems you are trying to justify and defend disgusting racial acts that have happened and to be honest it's a poor and futile attempt. Even in what you have written, there is a countless amount of times you have said "blacks" and "whites" as if these accounts were about HUMANS! I think you need to open your eyes to the truth and stop living in denial. Plus it takes a lot of energy/effort to hate why don't you relax and do something worthwhile with your time- the world is a big and beautiful place! Get a visa and travel America! :)

"It seems you are trying to justify and defend disgusting racial acts"

American history is about one people (blacks) brutally attacking another people (white people, specifically white women and children). It's all documented so the black man can't say it didn't happen. white people simply responded to the brutal crimes of the black man...and so did the black race when the black man did his disgusting crime against his own race.

If the black race had been given a homeland in America after the civil war...white people would have been so much better off. Integration with the black race is just down right STUPID. I long for the day that the black race is masters of their own destiny.

You think you know the slave, freedmen, Negro, or whatever label you give them...but you do not. Thanks for writing and giving proof to who you have shown yourself to be in America's history, both past and present. You psychopathic murder, rapist, terrorist, liar.

Rewriting history? You mean like how it was rewritten to give justification to hating white people? Look at the present folks, and you piece the past together. I am with the author. I'm proud of my race and all of our achievements, including putting an end to industrialized slavery. (Which no one recognizes)

the men lynched in the postcard image are Joseph Riley, and Virgil, Robert, and Thomas Jones who were lynched by a group of 100 whites for suggesting that the shooting of a white man was justified self defense.

I've done a lot of genealogy work reading through newspapers mainly from the 1880's to early 1900's, and it is amazing the number of lynching stories in these papers. Almost all of those who were lynched had either already been convicted of rape or murder, or had confessed to rape or murder. The reason for the lynching was that quite often the sentence was viewed as being insufficient. There were some cases where the person was still awaiting trial, but that was the minority of the cases.

If you search thru the Chronicling America website, using the search term Negro Lynch mob, you will find over 2,000 entries in old newspapers, including quite a few where it was known that the lynching was carried out by blacks.

All one needs is o look at Africa, Detroit, Chicago, New Orleans, St. Louis, Baltimore, Miami, London, Paris, etc. etc. where ever one goes wherever there is an abundance of black people you will find rape , robbery, drugs and murder quite common place. Now since this is fact when do you suppose this type of behaviour started? All you apologists despise facts and truth, it's the indoctrination by the race whore whose business is anarchy.

This site is a fraud. I guess Mr. Wolf believes no whites enslaved blacks. Blacks were not considered property like cattle. Emmet Till killed himself. All lynchings were by blacks. Please do your research and you will see this is no more a white supremacist with an agenda to distort the evils of whites.

Does look like everything written here its all properly sourced. Blacks it seems did a shit load of lynchings. So just curious whats the "fraud" you speak of? And if you go to the top of page you can see a link where white people did lots of lynchings

I believe that some of the people, or maybe all that responding that this piece is fraud, or racist, or whatever, didn't bother to even click on Any of the links to read the sources. It would be hard for them to deny the source from over 100 years ago...But, then again maybe they would still be in denial no matter what.

"In America between 1882 and 1968 there were three recognized legitimate sources for lynching data:: Chicago Tribune, Tuskegee Institute and the NAACP. The criteria for a "lynching" (created by the NAACP) requires that four conditions exist : (1) there must be evidence that a person was killed; (2) the person must have met death illegally; (3) a group of three or more persons must have participated in the killings (to rule out personal vendettas, etc.); and (4) the group must have acted under the pretext of protecting justice or tradition. Chicago Tribune began its lynching data in 1882; Tuskegee in 1892; NAACP sometime after 1913.

Note: When you see a reason cited for the lynching on any link, remember this:: When a Black man was found dangling (lynched) by White people, there was obviously no information available to accurately establish a reason for the lynching. So what would the person at Tuskegee (or the Tribune or the NAACP) do for citing a reason for the lynching? Well, he could easily manufacture a reason. There was no law against this practice. So when you come across preposterous reasons for Blacks being lynched, like "Acting suspiciously", "Quarreling", "Insulting a White man" , "Trying to vote", etc., don't believe it unless there is a verifiable source ( e.g. newspaper article) and the name of the Negro is given along with the cited reason for the lynching. Also, citing a fictitious reason like "quarreling" has another intended and insidious purpose:: It implies that 'barbaric' White people did the lynching. Right?

By the way...would you like to see the most ridiculous reason - IMO - ever for lynching someone? How about this one (negroes lynch a negro) >> LINK "

So let me get this right you guys are glad you found some compelling evidence that black hung people, compared to to hundreds of thousands you've done over the course of your history to blacks,indians, Muslims, and the Spaniards. Good for you lmfao.

I have a request: would you please post the pictures of all of the poor white men and/or women who were lynched by blacks? I am especially interested in the ones of groups of blacks with children smiling in the forefront. I have been looking, and you do suggest that blacks are more violent or prone to violence, so there should be plenty available. We see hundreds of white mobs laughing and smiling (and getting away) with black men swinging. Can you please include them in your next 'posts?' And again, if you can find any with black children laughing as the white man/woman swings, that would be VERY helpful to the discussion (and please don't say anything ridiculous like, "white people didn't have the cameras or power" or anything silly like that. I am serious.

Geez... I am just trying to make sure that you understand what I need. A lot of 'articles' can be faked - as I am sure you know. What we need is PHOTOS. Preferably Black mobs lynching either white men and/or women. And we also need the ones WITH Black children in the foreground like the ones we've seen so many times of white mobs lynching blacks (with children laughing/present). We will be eagerly waiting for those.

Reasons why negroes were lynched :;l) Trying to protect white families2) Send a message to the negro criminal element to STOP attacking white women, children law enforcement officers (the "message" didn't work....negro attacks on innocent white people hv never ceased -- particularly after the Civil Rights act, hv become a daily occurrence...all ignored by the democratic party run MSM)

The continued work of people who want to change history. You take a grain of truth and try to make a whole arguement that ignores all other facts and arguments. What about news bias? Do you think the papers reported a routine killing of a black person? It wasn't even news. And the editor was probably at the lynching.Just face facts. Your ancestors where monsters. As bad as any German ever was. YOU are now a psychopath because you have to make these logic leaps to feel like you aren't scum but the truth is you are trash from a long line of trash. Your people have been trying to find ways to justify targeting blacks for hundred of years. It's going to take more than 50 years to fix the centuries of violence against blacks. Every time there is a mass shooting it's a white person because your crazy "blame the other group" culture has this psychotic tenancy to kill groups of people built in. Got a problem-ban them all right trump? You identify a target group you think is week and try to exploit them. What I'm saying is American culture is a cowards culture. (Yea I said fuckin COWARD go cry to your cousin/wife. just cuz you own guns doesn't change anything) You are a coward for trying to hide your people's mistakes by trying to deflect to things blacks did wrong. No body is defending criminals or gangs - fuck those ignorant bastards. They give assholes like you something to point at as you try to demonize all blacks. You are defending racists. Think about that next time you're celebrating your pasty reflection.

This blog seems to be a lot more than just a "grain of truth." Blacks live in total denial. Anyone who challenges their false claim to historical events they go bonkers.The two links at the top of this page are also very revealing... Shows black racism/hate attacks on white people, black males attacking women and children in the white community...has a very very long history to it. I don't understand WHY white males created this integration system.

Blacks are a Third World people. They should NOT live among the civilized people.

What your historical account does not reveal is how many of the so called criminals that committed a crime and lynched for it was actually verfiable criminal accounts. As you know, and as history also reveals there were many instances especially where rape is concern that wasn't actually true but niggers was lynched anyway. And conversely, how many white people were lynched for the same criminal activities by other white people, not that they weren't at all but at what rate in comparison. The actions of white america in this period is disgusting and inhumane and I feel the same by the many that stood by silently and watch not only black men but black women and children suffer. Imagine people behaving in this monstrous, immmoral, despicable way, so Godless, and baseless, completely shameful and reprehensible!!! This article it steeped with bias, underrepresented "alternative facts" of course slanted toward the predator (white people) and not the victims (black people).Like the little boy who was beaten salvagely because he whistled at a young women, a minor (Emmit Teele) or the bustling city that was burned down because a man so called touched a white women when he tripped and reached for balance-she called rape-Black Wall Street in Tulsa Oklahoma. You cannot ommit the fact that you guys word was meaningless and that black people committing crimes in those days oppose to being accused of committing a crime is not synonimous with the facts, or realty! Go do some unbias real research and use facts, and not "alternative facts."

Here we go again. You guys make up stuff and distort the truth as evidence for the lies that you espouse. You even provide what you call evidence, (albeit your inability to find any newspaper accounts of that you are trying to dispel). But, you fail to provide that same source of evidence supporting your claims. In addition to making up stuff you take stuff out of context or you fall back on your own winning, pitiful cry of the poor white man who is being treated so badly by the big bad niggers. Carry on with your boohooing you wimp.

Finally, how can you have the audacity to speak on what someone else thinks in their own mind without being told BY THEM what they are thinking? Are you a mind reader... of course you are.

Why not try to sit down and work out a way to resolve the so called problems you say you know about and work on making this Country as great and free as you guys are always claiming it is.

White people, ALL OVER THE WORLD, must see the American Black's victims list of white victims... How black males have spent their history in America raping, murdering and massacring innocent white people. Under no circumstances should forced integration exist - particularly with THIS race. Go to top of page and click on THOSE LINKS...See for yourselves how white people tried desperately to fight back against the savage blacks all the way up to 1964...It didn't work... Then when the black man got his FREE integration...we all remember what they did in the 60s , right? Been attacking white people ever since, and getting a away with on all their racism and HATE in America. WHY would Europe allow this race into their 'civilized' political systems?!

Followers

Regrettable

Regarding the four pages Victims List::
How quickly the names and faces of victims of racial violence disappear, and for so many of the young victims we tend to forget they had such a long life to live, a contribution to make, a family to raise and a right to pursue life, have liberty and achieve happiness.