We use cookies to improve our service and to tailor our content and advertising to you.More infoYou can manage your cookie settings via your browser at any time. To learn more about how we use cookies, please see our cookies policy.

Abstract

Background This study aims to provide insight into (1) the associations between having a chronic disease and participation in paid work, volunteer activities or informal care, (2) the associations between the onset of a chronic disease and these forms of societal participation, and (3) whether these associations differ across educational level and gender.

Methods The study population consisted of n=21 875 respondents of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe aged between 50 years and the country-specific retirement age. The influence of having and the onset of a chronic disease on societal participation was analysed using a hybrid Poisson regression model, combining fixed and random effects, and presented by relative risks (RRs).

Results Individuals with a chronic disease were less likely to participate in paid work (RR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.67 to 0.71) and volunteer activities (RR: 0.92; 95% CI 0.88 to 0.97), but more likely to give informal care (RR: 1.05; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.08). Onset of a chronic disease was associated with a higher likelihood to quit paid work (RR: 0.91; 95% CI 0.86 to 0.97) and to give informal care (RR: 1.08; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.16). Lower educated individuals with a chronic disease or with the onset of a chronic disease were less likely to have paid work than higher educated individuals.

Conclusion Individuals with a chronic disease were less likely to participate in paid work and volunteer activities, and more likely to provide informal care. Educational inequalities were present for paid work. More insight into which factors hinder societal participation among individuals with a chronic disease is needed.

hybrid model

longitudinal

chronic disease

paid work

volunteer activities

informal care

Europe

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Introduction

The European population is ageing due to a decline in birth rates and increasing life expectancy. In Europe, per 100 persons of working age (15–64 years), 29.9 persons are aged 65 years and over.1 In order to keep the social security programmes sustainable and increase the proportion of older individuals in the labour force, benefit levels were reduced, early retirement schemes were adjusted or abolished, and the official retirement age was raised.2 In 2011, one-third of the working-age population of the European Union had a chronic disease.3 As a result of the increasing retirement age, the prevalence of chronic diseases within the working-age population is expected to further increase.4 5 Having chronic diseases might lead to ill health or limitations in physical or mental functioning.6 7 This might have consequences for participation in society. Societal participation can be seen as performing activities that are of benefit to individuals, groups or the society as a whole.8 Having paid work, performing volunteer activities and informal caregiving are considered typical forms of societal participation.

Previous research has shown that individuals with a chronic disease are less often involved in paid work as they are more likely to become unemployed or to receive work disability benefits.9 Besides limitations in functioning, one study found that individuals who were afraid that their health limited their ability to work reported less productivity at work or even exit from work.10

For other forms of societal participation, such as volunteer activities and informal caregiving, the impact of chronic diseases is less clear. Previous studies have found a negative association or no association between having a chronic disease and volunteer activities.11 12 A lack of knowledge exists regarding the influence of having a chronic disease on informal caregiving. On the one hand, individuals with a chronic disease might be less able to give informal care due to their health problems.13 On the other hand, they might feel more competent about their knowledge and skills to give informal care than healthy individuals.13 So far, most studies have used a cross-sectional design, which hampers a clear insight into how having a chronic disease will influence participation in volunteer activities or volunteer work.

In addition to the presence of a chronic disease, demographic factors might influence societal participation. Previous research has shown that lower educated individuals are more likely to have a chronic disease and are also less likely to participate in society than higher educated individuals.9 11 13 14 Workers with lower educational levels have an increased risk of health-related exit from paid work.15 One study found that workers with a combination of low socioeconomic status and presence of a cardiovascular disease were at a particularly high risk of exit from paid work by disability benefit.16 Women are more likely to have a chronic disease and are less likely to have paid work than men.17 18

Most studies concerning the effects of chronic diseases on societal participation, in particular on having paid work, have been primarily based on individuals with and without chronic diseases.9 However, this design might lead to biased results because individuals who have a chronic disease might differ in (un)observed covariates from individuals without a chronic disease. Fixed-effects models can estimate effects by making comparisons within individuals, and thereby eliminate the effects of confounding variables.19 The current study combines random and fixed effects in a hybrid model to analyse both differences in societal participation among individuals with and without a chronic disease (random effects) and the influence of the onset of a chronic disease on the three forms of societal participation (fixed effects).

This study aims to provide insight into (1) the associations between having a chronic disease and participation in paid work, volunteer activities or informal caregiving, (2) the associations between the onset of a chronic disease and these forms of societal participation, and (3) whether these associations differ across educational level and gender.

Methods

Study design

The study population was selected from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). SHARE is a longitudinal study of individuals aged 50 years and older across Europe and Israel. The sampling procedure differed between countries. The measurements for 2004, 2006, 2010, 2013 and 2015 were included for the present study. More information on SHARE has been described elsewhere.20 21

Study population

Figure 1 shows the flow diagram of the study population. First, individuals were included if they lived in Europe and participated in at least two waves (n=79 841), meaning that individuals living in Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden or Switzerland were included. Second, analyses were restricted to 27 058 individuals who were aged between 50 years and the country-specific retirement age in 2004.22 Third, individuals with a chronic disease, without a chronic disease and those who developed a chronic disease during follow-up were included (n=23 132), thereby excluding the observations from those who changed from having a chronic disease to not having a chronic disease (except for the sensitivity analyses). Lastly, individuals were included if they had information on societal participation, presence of a chronic disease and confounders (n=22 011). In total, 21 875 individuals were included in the final model as individuals were only included if they had information on the three forms of social participation in the same waves.

Societal participation

Participation in paid employment was assessed using the question ‘What is your current job situation?’ Response options were having paid work (including self-employed), unemployed, disabled, retired, taking care of family and other. The question was dichotomised into ‘paid work’ and ‘no paid work’.

Participation in volunteer activities was assessed using the question ‘Did you participate in one or more of the following activities in the last month?’ In case the option ‘charity or voluntary work’ was answered with ‘yes’, the person was considered to participate in volunteer activities. From wave 4 and onwards (2012, 2014, 2016), the time frame of this question changed from ‘last month’ to ‘last 12 months’.

Informal caregiving was assessed as the following: ‘In the last 12 months, have you personally listed any kind of help to a family member from outside the household (excluding grandchildren), friend or neighbour?’ Any kind of help referred to giving personal care, giving household help or helping with paperwork. This question was dichotomised into providing informal care in the past 12 months or not.

Chronic disease

Presence of a chronic disease was asked as the following: ‘Some people suffer from chronic or long-term health problems. By chronic or long-term we mean it has troubled you over a period of time or is likely to affect you over a period of time. Do you have any such health problems, illness, disability or infirmity? Individuals could answer ‘yes’ or ‘no’.

Demographic factors

Gender, age, education and marital status were included as demographic factors. Education was coded according to the 1997 International Standard Classification of Education and categorised into low (preprimary, primary and lower secondary), intermediate (upper secondary) and high (postsecondary) education. Marital status was dichotomised into living with or without a partner. Marital status was only measured at baseline, except when marital status changed during follow-up. If marital status was missing, marital status was imputed from the previous wave.

Analyses

Descriptive statistics of the study population were based on individuals’ first included observation. The correlation coefficients between the three outcome variables were analysed using Spearman.

A hybrid Poisson regression model for repeated measurements was used, also known as within-between model. This model allows to separately analyse the influence of having a chronic disease and the onset of a chronic disease on societal participation. An advantage of this model is that the within-individual part removes the effects of (unknown) time-invariant variables, resulting in no omitted-variable bias. The between-individual part, on the other hand, measures the effect of variables that do not change over time, such as having a chronic disease and gender, and allows coefficients to vary between individuals by also taking into account variables that do change over time.19 This means that that the hybrid model has both a between-individuals and within-individual regression.19 23 24 The between-individuals regression coefficient provided insight into the differences in societal participation between individuals with and without a chronic disease, while the within-individual regression coefficient showed the influence of the onset of a chronic disease on changes in the three types of societal participation between two waves.23 24 A random factor for each participant was added to the model to take into account the dependence of the multiple observations for each person. A random factor for country was also added to take into account that individuals from the same country are more like each other than those from another country. Furthermore, a dummy variable for each wave was added to take into account time trends. Since the prevalence of having paid work was relatively high (>10%), the associations were presented as relative risks (RR), calculated as a risk ratio.25 First, crude hybrid models were performed for associations between chronic disease and each outcome separately. Next, the hybrid models were adjusted for (1) demographic characteristics and (2) the two other forms of societal participation.

The following hybrid Poisson regression model was used:

in which yit is either paid work, volunteer activities or informal caregiving for individual i at time t; βonset is the regression coefficient for onset of a chronic disease, describing how the change of not having a chronic disease to having a chronic disease between waves will affect societal participation in that period within individuals (calculated by Xit as the presence of a chronic disease of participant i at measurement t minus Xi as the mean value of the chronic disease averaged across all measurements within each participant); βhaving is the regression coefficient for having a chronic disease; βwave is the regression coefficient for the subsequent waves; ui is the individual random factor; uc is the country random factor; γzi is the confounder; and εit is the error term.23

In case of statistically significant interaction for education and gender (p<0.05), analyses were stratified by these factors. For the stratified analyses, the level of education at baseline was used.

Furthermore, sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate whether the results differed when individuals with a transition from having a chronic disease to not having a chronic disease were included. Descriptive statistics and correlations were conducted using SPSS V.22 and the other analyses were conducted using R V.i386 3.4.2.

Results

Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the study population. Of the individuals with paid work, volunteer activities or informal caregiving at baseline, respectively, 26.3% (n=3834), 33.6% (n=1283) and 35.4% (n=3077) had a chronic disease and 22.5% (n=3277), 21.9% (n=838) and 22.8% (n=1977) had an onset of a chronic disease during follow-up. The majority (n=14 528) of the individuals had paid work, n=3824 had volunteer activities and n=8681 provided informal care at baseline. Of all participants, 4191 individuals did not participate in any of the three forms (ie, paid work, volunteer activities and informal caregiving), whereas 627 individuals participated in all three forms at baseline. The correlation between the three participation measures was low (Spearman’s r <0.15).

Table 2 shows that individuals with a chronic disease were less likely to have paid work (RR: 0.69) and volunteer activities (RR: 0.92) compared with those without a chronic disease. However, individuals with a chronic disease were more likely to give informal care compared with those without a chronic disease (RR: 1.05). Additional analyses showed a statistically significant interaction of having paid work and having a chronic disease with giving informal care. Individuals with paid work and with a chronic disease were more likely to give informal care than individuals without a chronic disease in paid work (RR: 1.11; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.16). Individuals with a chronic disease but without paid work were less likely to give informal care (RR: 0.94; 95% CI 0.88 to 0.99) than individuals without a chronic disease and paid work. Individuals with an onset of a chronic disease between two waves were less likely to remain in paid work during that period (RR: 0.91), but were more likely to give informal care during that period, compared with themselves in other periods (RR: 1.08).

Influence of having a chronic disease and the onset of a chronic disease on different types of societal participation (individuals n=21 875; countries n=17)

A statistically significant interaction was found between educational level and chronic disease for having paid work. All other interaction terms were not statistically significant. Table 3 shows that lower educated individuals with a chronic disease had a 45% higher probability to be out of paid work than higher educated individuals with a chronic disease (RR: 0.80 for high educated individuals and RR: 0.55 for low educated individuals). The onset of a chronic disease and the likelihood to quit paid work were statistically significant for intermediate (RR: 0.90) and low (RR: 0.88) education.

Associations of having a chronic disease and onset of a chronic disease on having paid work stratified by educational level (n=21 875)

The results of the sensitivity analyses, in which also individuals with a transition from a chronic disease to no chronic disease were included, were in line with the results in table 2. The RRs differed less than 5.5% from the presented results.

Discussion

Individuals with a chronic disease were less likely to participate in paid work and volunteer activities compared with individuals without a chronic disease. Unexpectedly, they were more likely to give informal care than those without a chronic disease. Individuals with onset of a chronic disease were less likely to participate in paid work. Besides, individuals with onset of a chronic disease became more active in informal caregiving. Among lower educated workers, the adverse effects of a chronic disease on paid work were stronger than among higher educated workers. Educational inequalities for paid work were present for onset of a chronic disease as well.

Participation in paid work

Our findings regarding the effects of having a chronic disease on having paid work are in line with previous studies.9 14 26 27 Individuals with a chronic disease might have more difficulties to participate in paid work due to functional limitations or lower psychosocial resources.6 7 Workers with a chronic disease are therefore more vulnerable to exit paid employment through work disability pension or unemployment.9

This is the first study that showed that the onset of a chronic disease is associated with a lower likelihood of participation in paid work. Furthermore, the regression coefficients were stronger for having a chronic disease than for onset of a chronic disease. An explanation is that onset of a chronic disease is an acute change, while having a chronic disease is both an acute and a long-term change. This implies that the influence of the onset of a chronic disease on labour force participation may well extend beyond two waves.

Lower educated individuals with a chronic disease were even less likely to have paid work compared with those with higher education and a chronic disease. Furthermore, intermediate and low educated individuals with the onset of a chronic disease were more likely to quit paid employment. Lower educated workers generally have a higher physical workload and lower job control than higher educated workers, whereby those with a chronic disease probably face more difficulties in combining their disease with their work tasks.28 29

Participation in volunteer activities

Few studies investigated the association between having a chronic disease and performing volunteer activities.11 12 It was expected that participation in volunteer activities was an alternative for individuals with a chronic disease when participation in paid work was not possible, since volunteer activities are more flexible and require less commitment.30 On the other hand, individuals with paid work experience a higher social status. This might lead to a higher level of identification to a collective identity and thus lead to less difficulties to participate in activities outside the labour market, such as volunteer activities.31

Onset of a chronic disease was not associated with having volunteer activities. Due to flexibility and commitment, it might be the case that individuals with the onset of a chronic disease put volunteer activities on hold, while not having consequences for their volunteer activity status yet.

Participation in informal care

Individuals with a chronic disease and those with an onset of a chronic disease were more likely to give informal care. Individuals with a chronic disease might be more likely to give informal care to others because they know which care to give or are better able at helping with paperwork to apply for help. A previous study found that about a third of Europeans aged 50 years or older help others with household tasks or personal care,13 while in the present study 40% of the individuals provided informal care. This might be explained by the broader concept of informal caregiving (giving personal care, giving household help or helping with paperwork) used in the present study. If a stricter concept of informal caregiving (help with personal care or help with household tasks) would have been used, the prevalence of informal caregiving might have been lower. On the other hand, the question on informal care did not take into account caregiving between partners, meaning that some informal caregiving might have been missed. However, informal caregiving to partners is not always recognised as informal care and individuals of 50 years and over give most care to parents, and we do not expect a major bias because of this.12 13

Strengths and limitations

The strengths of the present study are its longitudinal design and that both having a chronic disease and onset of a chronic disease were analysed in one model. Another strength is the inclusion of different forms of societal participation. The present study showed that the strengths of the associations between having a chronic disease and participation in paid work, volunteer activities or informal caregiving differed, which emphasised that a summarised outcome of overall societal participation has drawbacks. It has been suggested that individuals may experience different benefits from different types of societal participation, and that individuals might even receive energy from participation in more than one form of societal participation.32 Some limitations should be considered as well. First, since 65.4% of the individuals participated only twice in SHARE, causality or reversed causality could not be investigated with a time-lag model. In other words, it was not possible to distinguish between cause and consequences. Second, the time frame of assessing volunteer activities changed from ‘last month’ to ‘last year’ between wave 2 and wave 4. As a consequence, 14.8% and 15.6%, respectively, participated in volunteer activities in the first two waves, while in the last three waves this increased to 20.1%, 20.5% and 19.4%, respectively. This might mean that individuals are more likely to participate once or a few times per year in volunteer activities instead of participating in volunteer activities on a monthly basis. Third, data from wave 3 (SHARELIFE) were excluded from the current study because this wave focused on people’s life histories. This means that the years 2008 and 2009 were not covered, resulting in less observations per person. Since the time frame of the questions referred to the current moment and up to the past year, it is not likely that the exclusion of SHARELIFE has biased the results of the current study. Furthermore, having a chronic disease was self-reported and very broadly assessed. Moreover, it is unknown whether the disease was confirmed by a doctor. Therefore, individuals might have different views concerning whether a health problem is a chronic disease or not. Fifth, the official retirement age was based on the country-specific retirement age during the first wave of SHARE (2004). Nowadays, the official retirement age is higher in most European countries. However, most often this is a gradual process and therefore no major differences in outcomes are expected. Finally, SHARE provides opportunities to focus on cross-national differences. Unfortunately, our study population was too small for evaluation of country differences. Thus, we were unable to evaluate the influence of, for example, social security system and economic climate on the generalisability of our findings to individual countries. Larger studies are required to address cross-national differences in the determinants of societal participation.

The results of this longitudinal study showed that having a chronic disease reduced participation in paid work and volunteer activities, but increased participation in informal caregiving. Moreover, individuals with an onset of a chronic disease had a higher likelihood of quitting paid work and were more likely to give informal care. Educational inequalities were observed for paid work for both having and onset of a chronic disease. Research should focus on the underlying factors which might hinder or facilitate individuals with or the onset of a chronic disease to participate in paid work, volunteer activities and informal caregiving.

What is already known on this subject

Individuals with a chronic disease are less likely to participate in paid work than those without a chronic disease, but the association between having a chronic disease and participation in volunteer activities or informal caregiving is not clear yet.

No study has investigated the association between onset of a chronic disease and participation in these forms of societal participation.

What this study adds

Individuals with a chronic disease were less likely to have paid work and volunteer activities, but were more likely to give informal care.

Individuals with the onset of a chronic disease were less likely to have paid work, but were more likely to give informal care.

Lower educated individuals with a chronic disease had a lower probability to have paid work than higher educated individuals with a chronic disease.

Low and intermediate educated individuals with the onset of a chronic disease were more likely to quit paid work than low and intermediate educated individuals without a chronic disease.

Research should focus on the barriers and facilitators for individuals with or the onset of a chronic disease to participate in society.

. When work and satisfaction with life do not go hand in hand: health barriers and personal resources in the participation of people with chronic physical disabilities. Soc Sci Med2009;69:56–60.doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.04.014

Footnotes

Contributors The study was conceived by MiS, KOH and SJWR. Statistical analyses were designed by MeS, KOH, SJWR and MiS, and undertaken by MiS. Interpretation of data was undertaken by KOH, SJWR, MeS and MiS. KOH, SJWR and MiS produced the initial draft of the manuscript; all authors (MiS, KOH, CRLB, AB, MeS, AJvdB, SJWR) revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version prepared by KOH, SJWR and MiS, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding The SHARE data collection has been primarily funded by the European Commission through FP5 (QLK6-CT-2001-00360), FP6 (SHARE-I3: RII-CT-2006-062193, COMPARE: CIT5-CT-2005-028857, SHARELIFE: CIT4-CT-2006-028812) and FP7 (SHARE-PREP: N°211909, SHARE-LEAP: N°227822, SHARE M4: N°261982). Additional funding from the German Ministry of Education and Research, the Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science, the US National Institute on Aging (U01_AG09740-13S2, P01_AG005842, P01_AG08291, P30_AG12815, R21_AG025169, Y1-AG-4553-01, IAG_BSR06-11, OGHA_04-064, HHSN271201300071C) and from various national funding sources is gratefully acknowledged (see http://www.share-project.org). SJWR is funded by a fellowship from the Erasmus University Rotterdam.

Competing interests None declared.

Patient consent Not required.

Ethics approval The SHARE study was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the University of Mannheim (until 2011) and the Ethics Council of the Max-Planck-Society for the Advancement of Science (since 2011).

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.