Calling for Barack the Bold

Obama in defeat. Head hung low. Chin on chest. Feet dragging along the ground.

He has lost the Olympics! (Which means half of Chicago is now cheering him.) He dared to leave the White House and go boldly where no president has gone before.

Story Continued Below

And he failed. Even some of his supporters say that going to Copenhagen to make a pitch to the International Olympic Committee was a mistake. Obama should never have risked it. To which I say: Baloney.

Barack Obama was not elected to be timid. His motto during the campaign was “change,” not “cringe.”

It is not all that important where the Olympics are held. (It is a TV show; who cares what country it is in?) What is important is the lesson Obama learns from his defeat.

The wrong lesson is: Take the easy path, play the safe bet, risk nothing.

The right lesson comes directly from Vince Lombardi: “Winners never quit, and quitters never win.”

Barack Obama was elected to do bold things. And in difficult times, boldness is needed most.

So what should he do now? First, he should be bold on health care. Congress is not a place where boldness happens. Congress is a place where boldness goes to die.

Obama needs to be bold in backing the public option. The White House did not anticipate that the public would actually care about the public option. But it does. The public option is not the choice of “left-wing” America. (Left-wingers want a single-payer plan, like Canada’s.) The public option is the choice of mainstream America.

If you force every American to buy health insurance, thereby providing the health care industry with millions of new customers, you must have some way of controlling that industry’s greed. (If you want to see what unchecked greed leads to, you need look no farther than Wall Street.)

Obama said in his speech to a joint session of Congress in September that the public option would “keep insurance companies honest.” Without it, presumably those companies won’t be.

But Obama has also said the public option is merely a “sliver, one aspect” of health care reform in America. And when the White House dithers a little, Congress dithers a lot.

Obama now needs to demand that Senate Democrats adopt the public option as part of their health care bill and summon all 60 of their votes to block a filibuster on it. (If, after stopping a filibuster, individual Democrats want to vote against the health care bill on its merits, that is fine. But there is no point in having 60 votes if you are not going to use 60 votes.) This is better than using the majority-vote tactic called reconciliation. Reconciliation risks all sorts of unintended consequences.