We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By closing this message, you
are consenting to our use of cookies.

Plagiarism and inclusivity highlighted in new study into the arts, humanities and social sciences

2nd September 2019

A new study looking at the issues arising in publication ethics that journal editors face within the arts, humanities and social sciences has highlighted that detecting plagiarism in papers submitted to a journal is the most serious issue they tackle, something which over half of editors reported encountering.

The findings of this new research also reveal that remaining inclusive whilst addressing issues around language and writing quality barriers is the most prevalent issue they experience, as global research output continues to grow.

The report has been carried out by COPE (the Committee on Publication Ethics), which provides leadership on publication ethics and offers a range of resources to support journal editors and publishers on all aspects of ethical issues in research publishing. The study was commissioned to address perceptions within COPE that Arts, Humanities, and Social Science members may not consider COPE to be as relevant to them as to Science, Technology, Medicine members.

This primary research project was the first COPE has carried out exclusively focused on arts, humanities and social sciences disciplines. The organisation is looking to explore how it should extend its guidance to journal editors; something which it is encouraging is used further by journal editors in the arts, humanities and social sciences following these results.

Completed by more than 650 journal editors (not solely COPE members), the study showed the following key findings:

There were no significant differences in the concerns reported by journal editors from different subject areas, or regionally, suggesting that many of the issues are experienced across multiple disciplines within the arts, humanities and social sciences. However, there was some evidence that Business, Finance and Economics journal editors were more likely to encounter or hear about publication ethics issues than other fields of study.

Following the result of the study, COPE urged the importance of working alongside journal editors to develop existing, or create new, publication ethics guidance. The organisation is encouraging journal editors to make the most of COPE’s resources available to them.

Commenting on the project, Deborah Poff, COPE Chair, added: “This research is part of a renewed commitment by COPE to increase the diversity of our services for all disciplinary and interdisciplinary fields.

“These findings provide important information about the specific resource needs of our editors and publishers in numerous arts, humanities, and social sciences fields.

“The study is consistent with the focus of topics at our North American seminar held earlier this year. In the coming months, we will continue to roll out discussion material and resources specifically focused on issues in these fields.”

The research was devised in collaboration with and support from Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group.

Tracy Roberts, Publishing Director for the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences at Taylor & Francis, said: “As the world’s largest publisher of arts, humanities and social sciences journals, we understand the publication ethics challenges faced by journal editors in these fields and work alongside editors and editorial boards, providing support on individual cases in line with existing COPE guidance.

“However, we know that some of the challenges faced by those in the arts, humanities and social sciences does differ to STM fields.

“It is because of these differences that we believe it is incredibly valuable to support COPE in this study. Its findings offer a unique opportunity to gather an evidence-base for the development of further publication ethics guidance specifically for these disciplines, whilst also providing the foundation for more research into this crucial area.”

COPE is committed to educate and support editors, publishers and others involved in publication ethics, with the aim of moving the culture of publishing towards one where ethical practices become the norm. Our approach is firmly in the direction of influencing through education, guidance and support of our members alongside the fostering of professional debate in the wider community.

COPE’s 10 Core Practices which includes resources such as guidelines, flowcharts and real publication ethics cases, covers many ethical issues to help editors in their day to day work.

COPE was established in 1997 by a small group of medical journal editors but now has over 12,500 members worldwide from all academic fields.

About Taylor & Francis Group

Taylor & Francis Group (of which Routledge is part) partners with researchers, scholarly societies, universities and libraries worldwide to bring knowledge to life. As one of the world’s leading publishers of scholarly journals, books, ebooks and reference works our content spans all areas of Humanities, Social Sciences, Behavioural Sciences, Science, and Technology and Medicine.

From our network of offices in Oxford, New York, Philadelphia, Boca Raton, Boston, Melbourne, Singapore, Beijing, Tokyo, Stockholm, New Delhi and Johannesburg, Taylor & Francis staff provide local expertise and support to our editors, societies and authors and tailored, efficient customer service to our library colleagues.

Books contacts

A 425-million-year-old millipede fossil found in Scotland is the world's oldest known fossil of an insect or arachnid. Researchers have published their exciting new findings in Historical Biology [Read more...]

3

1

3 days ago

We are excited to announce have integrated into their #manuscriptsubmission processes with . More here: [Read more...]

0

0

5 days ago

Does #pregnancy affect #memory? This article, in the news, compared control participants with those in their third trimester of pregnancy to find out... #Neuropsychology [Read more...]

1

2

9 days ago

What can modern scientists, looking for a #COVID19 vaccine, learn from Edward Jenner? This article looks at the history of smallpox
and vaccination
[Read more...]

0

1

9 days ago

How will #sports be after #COVID19? This article examines role of the media and how it affects sports #socialmedia #golf [Read more...]

2

0

10 days ago

A recent study of people in Singapore who had contracted SARS in the early aughts found they retain “significant levels of neutralizing antibodies” for nine to 17 years after initial infection [Read more...]

0

0

11 days ago

This study found that shields worn by a test subject within 1.8 metres of a cough reduced inhaled influenza virus by 92%, although this protective effect reduced after the cough had dispersed for 30 minutes [Read more...]

2

0

17 days ago

This new research shows that people believe they're less likely than others are to fall for online scams. The cybersecurity study has significant implications as we increasingly work remotely during #COVID19 pandemic [Read more...]

0

1

17 days ago

The number of Asian Hornets, Vespa mandarinia, is on the rise in North America. This study shows just how potentially lethal they are with 30 to 50 people dying each year in Japan alone [Read more...]

0

0

18 days ago

Looking at 315,000 children, this new study out today suggests that childhood obesity raises bladder cancer risk. The findings could help scientists improve their understanding of what triggers bladder cancer [Read more...]