Separate but equal in England

British Muslim leaders meeting with government representatives to discuss ways of combating extremism are calling for the establishment of Islamic law (shari’a) to govern Muslims’ family life.

“We told her if you give us religious rights, we will be in a better position to convince [Muslim] young people that they are being treated equally along with other citizens,” said Syed Aziz Pasha, secretary general of the Union of Muslim Organizations of the U.K. and Ireland.

Did you get that? These Muslims insist that the only way to treat British Muslims “equally” is to remove them entirely from the British judicial system. In the topsy-turvy world of Islam, you cannot be equal if you are being held to Western legal standards. Implicit in this, of course, is the thought that the only proper standard, the only “equal” standard, is sharia law. And the next step is that, in a few years, Muslims will demand full equality for all British people by having them subscribe to sharia law as well.

I’ve long assumed that immigrants from Third World countries to the West made the trek because they were mired in poverty and oppression, and wanted to have access to the West’s economic opportunities and freedom. The British Muslims, though, make me think I was all wrong. I get the feeling that many of these people did come to the West, not to escape their situations, but truly to recreate them — that is, the plan all along was to create a worldwide caliphate, seeding it one immigrant at a time.

Share this:

Like this:

Was it the plan of Arabs back in 1950? I think not. Sometimes the fog of war allows you to take advantages of the enemy’s weaknesses. In these terms, the weakness of Europe has always been their self-righteous conviction in their own superiority, it has always been in their arrogance and blind assumption of worth and intrinsic talent.

All cultures have this more or less, it is a defense mechanism. The Arabs just made sure to turn a culture’s defense mechanism into the weapon in which that culture is destroyed by.

Europe once prided themselves on their egalitarian social superiority over the crude and rude mish mash of American culture. Europe prided themselves on their purity, on their economy, on their self-righteous morality and position in this world.

France even went so far as to ban the english word email, an d replaced it with an arbitrary and artificial french word that meant the same thing. That isn’t purity, that is stagnancy.

The Arabs saw this, they knew, even if they didn’t plan for it. What fools they would have been had they not taken advantage of such gross and clear cracks in the fabric of European thoughts and beliefs.

And what are the British government representatives saying from their side of the table in these discussions?

I find all this incredibly scary, but I would feel a lot better if I knew the government was standing up to the absurdity of this.
Do Jews need the Senate to pass a law forbidding the mixing of milk and meat? Do Catholics need the House of Reps to make divorce a felony? Members of other religions follow the rules if they want to, and Muslims are free to do this with their religious practices as well – as long as (and here’s the rub) everything they want to do is LEGAL. Well, I guess that means no honor killings.

How would this proposal combat extremism? It seems to me it would institutionalize extremism, with no recourse available to the rest of the citizens of England.

Absolutely NUTS!

Danny Lemieux

There is a reason that those Muslims came from lands mired in misery and poverty. Now they want to infect Western civilization with their social diseases as well. However, the infection would not have been able to take hold if Western Society had been healthy to begin with.

Writing this blog is a labor of love. However, if you'd like to donate money for my efforts, please feel free to do so: