Who Are the People in the Quiz?

Note by the Saker: I learned the hard way and have come to terms with the following sad facts: a) there will always be people who will deliberately accuse others of things they neither said nor meant and b) some people are simply to stupid to understand an argument. The following article by Jimmie Moglia will be an ideal target for both of these categories. The only way for me to protect myself and my guest authors would be to write only very primitive and politically correct articles. Not a good idea, I think we can agree on that. So, for the dishonest or simply dense, let me clarify that Jimmie denounces an ideology, a mindset, a worldview, not a people. Furthermore, with russophobia run amok and exposing us all to a potential nuclear apocalypse, I think that Jimmie’s article is not only very interesting historically speaking, but also very timely. Truly, if we don’t learn anything from history, then there is no hope for humanity as we can’t go on repeating the same mistakes over and over again. So, with all this in mind, I leave you with Jimmie’s thought provoking article. The Saker

Who Are the People in the Quiz?

by Jimmie Moglia

Given that, for any current political or social event, there is a wealth of interpretations, from the simplest to the most elaborate, I will not add yet another voice. For I resent the idea of telling others what they already know – or most do anyway.

Furthermore I wonder whether, in the current climate of thought, crime and politics, we should resign ourselves to watch silently the flying arrows of outrageous prevarications and crimes – Gaza comes to mind as one example. Considering that taking arms against evil and by opposing end it, is delusional, for the conformism of silence and the distortion of facts by interested parties can hide the grossest crimes.

Instead, in this blog, I will challenge my 25 readers to solve a riddle, designed after I finished reading a relatively short book, of which the intended objective will become clear, once the riddle is solved.

From the book I have extracted the most significant statements, leaving out what people or nation the propositions refer to. Or rather, whenever the name of the nation or people appear in the original, I have replaced them with “XXX.” Therefore, if, for example, the book had referred to Klingons, “XXX” would stand alternatively for,

*** the Klingons
*** the land of the Klingons
*** the state of Klingonland
*** the people of Klingonland
*** Klingonism

You are invited to guess who is/are the XXX people and what XXX nation is the recipient of the affirmations and proposals contained in the book. All citations are authentic. Dots at the beginning or in the middle of a quote, indicate the presence (in the original), of supplementary clauses or qualifications, omitted here for concision, but that do not alter in any way the meaning of the statement.

This book was written in our historic times. Some may be surprised when they read the author’s proposed solution to the problem he identifies.

Naturally it may reduce the thrill, however modest, if you look for the solution before you have read the quotes and, maybe, meditated on the frame of mind that inspired the book. Equally, at the end, I will offer some related testimonials printed by the US mainstream media, at a time when sincerity was not yet politically incorrect.

“… of (XXX)… they are people who cherish darkness”
“… There will always be a XXX”
“… This nation (XXX) must be prepared to pay a total penalty.”
“ … (hatred) exists as a whole in the XXX nation”
“ (we)… must make certain that the vicious fangs of the XXX serpent shall never strike again.”
“… Nothing else would assure humanity’s safety and security, but that that XXX be forever expunged, and the diseased carcass which harbors it be forever removed from this world.”
“… (the XXX are people) whose souls exude no spiritual warmth; one pities them.”
“We need not condemn the XXX people. They stand self-condemned. For each suffices to read and hear those words written and spoken only by XXX”
“… they have lost the wish to be human beings…. This is an objective viewpoint, carefully considered and factually sustained.”
… “the XXX are an execrable people!”
“Time cannot change the infernal XXX breed, whatever its label.”
“… The suffering of their people are the best description of the XXX character, methods, and final aims.”
“… (the XXX thought) is a bud whose nourishment is drawn not from an isolated branch but from the very roots of the XXX soul.”
“… The goal of world dominion must be removed from the reach of the XXX people and the only way to accomplish that is to remove the XXX nation from the world.”
“It is in every respect a (XXX) deliberate, ruthlessly calculated plot to dominate the world or, failing that, to annihilate it.”
“(The aim of world domination)… will, if the schizophrenic XXX nation continue to exist, wreck the policies and actions of any party in control of XXX in the future.”
“… The world will feel their sting so long as (other people) continue to tolerate XXX on the earth, for those XXX traits are the same as those which, emanating from the XXX soul, animated the XXX tribes of yore.”
“… through foisting wars upon the world, the XXX nation is destined to become the super-state of the universe, and to hold its people in thralldom.”
“(these ideas of superiority)… are very definitely existing as inherent in the XXX character and innate in his soul.”
“Lying and deceit are encouraged as being a foundation stone for XXX policy.”
“As far back as 1895 various XXX writers and policy makers were already prophesying how and when the ideological goal of XXX world-dominion would be attained.”
“These prophets were by no means few in number; there exists a large number of serious works by XXX authors in which the destiny of their nation is elaborately worked out in full detail and the deification of XXX as a superior race depicted.”
“(According to them), everybody (will be) happy because all the XXX will be united and will be ruling the world.”
“Another professor, (name omitted) added that the XXX should build a state within a state, in the United States.”
“As she does today, XXX has always laughed at any actual resistance from the United States, consistently declaring the United States to be nothing more than, to use the words of a XXX, a heterogeneous melange of crass jingoists having no pure racial blood to build upon… A land and a people to be easily vanquished, at any time, by the superior XXX.”
“The time will assuredly come, when the nation of XXX, during the confusion caused by some international event, will have the opportunity to dominate America.”
“XXX intellect, XXX culture, XXX emotion, politics, in fact all things XXX, are each but a tiny rivulet feeding with its water the mighty rushing stream which is the XXX soul.”
“… if what I find in these sources is a capacity to think like the XXX, I would rather cease thinking that all. It is the absolute negation of everything which in the past tended to the elevation of mankind, and the installation in place thereof of a system of thorough dishonesty, emphasized by stupidity. There is a low cunning about it too, which is to me in the last degree repulsive.”
“Because she made no effort thousands of years ago to become civilized, XXX today is an outsider among all civilized nations.”
“The deliberate and perverse distortions of what should have been a sane and normal course of development, now gives to XXX and her people the capacity unexcelled by any other people on earth, for fostering and propagating every indecent and inhuman precept of life.”
“ … how much misery, suffering, death and destruction are needed before it becomes apparent to the world that any compromise with XXX will, of itself, be a certain guarantee that soon after, XXX must embark upon her unholy crusade to dominate it?”
“Is it possible for the world, in any manner, to find some compromise that would allow both it and XXX to exist side-by-side in peace and justice?… We should like to hope so; but the history of that nation cuts the hope out of our heart.”
“XXX must disappear forever from this earth! And fortunately, as we shall now come to see, that is no longer impossible of accomplishment.”
“Quite naturally, massacre and the wholesale execution must be ruled out…. There remain then but one more means of riddling the world forever of XXX…. This modern method, known to science as Eugenic Sterilization, is at once practical, humane and thorough.”
“(The program entails)…. organizing the civilian population, both male and female, and effect their sterilization.”

Here is the solution of the riddle. The author of this remarkable book was the Jewish Theodore Kaufman, and the title was “Germany Must Perish.” Therefore for “XXX” you must insert German, Germans, the German Nation, the State of Germany, Germanism.

What did the US mainstream media think of “Germany must Perish” ?

“A Sensational Idea” (Time Magazine)

“A Provocative Theory Interestingly Presented” (Washington Post)

“A Plan for Permanent Peace Among Civilized Nations” (New York Times)

Theodore Kaufman was born in New York, February 22, 1910 and died in Orange, New Jersey on April 1, 1986). He was a businessman with a penchant for mass sterilization at large.

For in 1939, as “Chairman of the American Federation of Peace,” he published manifestos where he argued that Americans should be sterilized so that their children will no longer have to fight in foreign wars.

But in 1941, mellowed by the stealing hours of time, he wrote and published “Germany Must Perish!” Perhaps understandably, ideas of mass sterilization of Germans, as the reviews indicate, were more heartily welcomed by the American press than the mass sterilization of Americans.

In his book, Kaufman also shows utter contempt for all German culture, scientists, teachers, writers, theologians, statesmen and philosophers, including Kant and Hegel, to name but two. Curiously, Karl Marx was not in the list.

Perhaps he would have liked to include Mozart, Beethoven, Bach, Handel, Wagner, Strauss and others – for he did not distinguish between Austrians and Germans.

Maybe in the instance, he opted for tacit omission rather than controversial inclusion. For eyes and minds may tire at reading Kant or Hegel, hence contempt is not likely to raise many eyebrows. But the ears behave differently. Why risk questionable objections when the press was ready for lavishing praise.

On the other hand, Kaufman’s opus became a useful tool for Germany’s propaganda. The point is so obvious as to call into question Kaufman’s intentions – thus opening a disturbing lateral line of thought.

For Judea, as a super-national body, had already declared war on Germany in 1933, as reported by various newspaper headlines. For example,

“Judea Declares War on Germany” (Daily Express, March 24, 1933) –

or by The Vancouver Express,

“War to Death Against the German People,” etc.

Therefore, was it helpful for the Jews in Germany to have the fire further stoked by a book calling for the actual extermination of the German people?

I will let more qualified minds answer the question. Unquestionable, though, is the spirit of the book. The accusations levied by our author against the Germans, have the ring of what qualified psychologists call “projection,” assigning to others the darkness of one’s own thought.

By itself, the interpretation of ‘projection’ may be arbitrary. But it is not, when compared with some teachings, declarations and statements made by eminent members of Mr. Kaufman’s co-religionists.

To quote an example. Mr. Trump’s Jewish son-in-law and his wife, converted to Judaism, apparently belong to a “Chabad Lubavitch” Synagogue. As I read, “Chabad Lubavitch is today one of the world’s best known Hasidic movements and is well known for its outreach.”

And in the “Jewish Week,” a well known Jewish publication in the United States, we find statements as follow, made by Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburgh, belonging to the Chabad Lubavitch movement. “If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an innocent non-Jew passing by to save him? The Torah would probably permit that. Jewish life has an infinite value. There is something infinitely more holy and unique about Jewish life than non-Jewish life.”

Many may probably say, “So what?” Everybody is entitled to his own opinions. But even the most open-minded observer cannot help reading, in considerations of this type, the blessing of the slaughter of today’s Palestinians and perhaps tomorrow’s Iranians. And the day after tomorrow, who knows?

For Supreme Israel’s Rabbi Ovadia Josef, recently deceased and whose funeral was attended by the largest crowd in Israel, also said (as quoted from “The Times of Israel”),

“Hurricane Katrina was divine punishment for godlessness and American support for the disengagement from Gaza.”

“Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi (oriental lord) and eat… That is why gentiles were created.” …And other similar finesses.

Some gentiles may be flattered by these prospects – or at least so it seems by the lavish and unanimous praise of Israel by politicians, congressmen, senators, lobbyists and, of course, the President in Washington. But others may still dare ask themselves if there is something they missed or did not understand.

The Essential Saker III: Chronicling The Tragedy, Farce And Collapse of the Empire in the Era of Mr MAGA

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to get more info on formatting

(1) Leave the name field empty if you want to post as Anonymous. It's preferable that you choose a name so it becomes clear who said what. E-mail address is not mandatory either. The website automatically checks for spam. Please refer to our moderation policies for more details. We check to make sure that no comment is mistakenly marked as spam. This takes time and effort, so please be patient until your comment appears. Thanks.

(2) 10 replies to a comment are the maximum.

(3) Here are formating examples which you can use in your writing:
<b>bold text</b> results in bold text
<i>italic text</i> results in italic text
(You can also combine two formating tags with each other, for example to get bold-italic text.)
<em>emphasized text</em> results in emphasized text
<strong>strong text</strong> results in strong text
<q>a quote text</q> results in a quote text (quotation marks are added automatically)
<cite>a phrase or a block of text that needs to be cited</cite> results in:a phrase or a block of text that needs to be cited
<blockquote>a heavier version of quoting a block of text...</blockquote> results in:

a heavier version of quoting a block of text that can span several lines. Use these possibilities appropriately. They are meant to help you create and follow the discussions in a better way. They can assist in grasping the content value of a comment more quickly.

and last but not least:
<a href=''http://link-address.com''>Name of your link</a> results in Name of your link

(4)No need to use this special character in between paragraphs:&nbsp;You do not need it anymore. Just write as you like and your paragraphs will be separated.The "Live Preview" appears automatically when you start typing below the text area and it will show you how your comment will look like before you send it.

(5) If you now think that this is too confusing then just ignore the code above and write as you like.

wow – I didn’t read this comment but referred to The International Jew by Henry Ford – because of Jimmie’s article – I think its a great book – although, like I said in my comment – I haven’t studied it yet – just looked into it.

From the linked story:
“there’s nothing inherently wrong with square dancing—but there is something sinister about declaring it to be more valuable than any other form of dance”

That ‘s right. There is nothing wrong with square dancing.
This is ad hominem tommy rot. What is the relevance?
I grew up doing all kinds of folk dancing, square dancing, schottische, eightsomes, reels, which was kind of a leftist thing to be doing, actually. Like the revival of folk music in the fifites (yes, long before Dylan came along there were Pete Seeger, Huddie Ledbetter, Woody Guthrie), itself building on traditions of the thirites, which themselves built on earlier traditions, and so on. Of course new music reproduction technologies influenced this tradition in many ways. Alan Lomax and John Hammond, carrying tape recorders, captured much of the music of American whites and blacks in the thirties and forties.
Reducing the folk heritage of the USA to what Ford said about it and the ways he tried to exploit it is . . . well, looks totally irrelevant to Moglia’s essay, actually . . .
Katherine

Nature always produces an antidote to every ill-effect, but often enough, in the short term, the imagined antidote is merely the mirror image of the spiritual or mental illness, replacing “them” with “us” in an egocentric fitful acting out of the dominance/submission cycle of reversing the oppressor and oppressed roles…..until both are just slavish victims of the same souless, psychotic mind control such that it is not possible to tell them apart…because in fact…they are the same!

ZIonazis.

The problem is that much of the rest of the human race either shares many of these traits of identification with particularism of irreconcilable difference as their self-defined, anxious, fearful and aggressive narrow identity…..in rejection of Universal Humanism OR they don’t, preferring to “get along” as best they can, which often means tolerating the Ascendant Abusive Group of The Present Era instead of being more militant in their defense of the Principle of Universal Humanity over Particular Ethnicity or Tribe.

Most people in the US and Europe are the same gutless wonders now as they were in the 1930s but with the progression of time you have the prime extremely instructive and stark ironies such as “Jewish” Vickie Nuland deploying Nazi’s in Ukraine to finally assist those growing numbers of people of good will around the world in seeing how intolerably insane and blatantly stupid and dangerous it is to not reject BOTH sides of the Zio/Nazi “Coin”..

As we plumb the depth of the genocidal Talmudic ideology (not a religion, really), we must not solely focus on the evil of the purveyors.

We must focus on their number one target, Russians, Russia and Russian civilization including most centrally, Orthodox Christianity.

Why? Why the Russophobia and drive to war of all forces, US, Britain, NATO, Wahhabis, and the financially endowed satanists of the Talmudic-Khazarian cult? Why are they hellbent to destroy all that is Russia?

Maybe the question should be why are Russian leaders and by extension russophobes gracefully suckling them in, with the believe they can beat the devil playing by its rules?

They have successfully destroy any vestige of Christianity in Europe and now trying to do the same to Eastern Orthodox which has it last fortress in Russia. The last time Russia tried atheism what was her end result? The russophobes are offering them a free ticket again, and why pay for something you can get for free. The end of Putin six years term will reveal the known unknown.

“The supreme goal of this Soviet state is the building of a classless communist society in which there will be public, communist self-government. the main aims of the people’s socialist state are: to lay the material and technical foundation of communism, to perfect socialist social relations and transform them into communist relations, to mould the citizen of communist society, to raise the people’s living and cultural standards, to safeguard the country’s security, and to further the consolidation of peace and development of international co-operation.”

“Göring: Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”

“They have successfully destroy any vestige of Christianity in Europe and now trying to do the same to Eastern Orthodox which has it last fortress in Russia. ”
You have hit the Nail on its Head. The foundation of European Culture has been irreparably (perhaps) damaged. I do not see a way at the moment how this will be undone.

Seems to me, that all this projection ,mentioned in text above , is perfectly matching things that happened in today ,s world! Some nations are predestined to be destroyed by others! For example Russians, Russian Civilisation and theirs Orthodox Christianity, Russophobia today is at far greater magnitude higher ,than in Mccartney,s time!Palestinians ,who lived for a Centuryes in their land, are not ewen cannon fodder for israelis ! And there are more and more nations in this world who are ,,less,, worth than others! All that hatred and agressivenes is a way to more slaughters , more wars, more human misery ! And what is end result of all that:- more wars,more misery, more human thragedies-and all that in an newer ending vicious circle!

Ami … Firstly I have a problem with a notion like «predestination» – to which I will come back . Secondly the current use of the catchall term «Jew» both with respect to what Douglas Reed calls Judahites or Judaists (page 23 The Controversy of Zion) or to the non-semitic converts of the Yiddish speaking Ashkenazi or Ladino speaking Sephardim. As Shlomo Sand suggests referring to people in communities calling themselves Jewish :

“No population remains pure over a period of thousands of years. But the chances that the Palestinians are descendants of the ancient Judaic people are much greater than the chances that you or I are its descendents. The first Zionists, up until the Arab Revolt [1936-9], knew that there had been no exiling, and that the Palestinians were descended from the inhabitants of the land. They knew that farmers don’t leave until they are expelled. Even Yitzhak Ben-Zvi, the second president of the State of Israel, wrote in 1929 that, ‘the vast majority of the peasant farmers do not have their origins in the Arab conquerors, but rather, before then, in the Jewish farmers who were numerous and a majority in the building of the land.'” And how did millions of Jews appear around the Mediterranean Sea ?

“The people did not spread, but the Jewish religion spread. Judaism was a converting religion. Contrary to popular opinion, in early Judaism there was a great thirst to convert others. The Hasmoneans were the first to begin to produce large numbers of Jews though mass conversion, under the influence of Hellenism. The conversions between the Hasmonean Revolt and Bar Kochba’s rebellion are what prepared the ground for the subsequent, wide-spread dissemination of Christianity. After the victory of Christianity in the fourth century, the momentum of conversion was stopped in the Christian world, and there was a steep drop in the number of Jews. Presumably many of the Jews who appeared around the Mediterranean became Christians. But then Judaism started to permeate other regions – pagan regions, for example, such as Yemen and North Africa. Had Judaism not continued to advance at that stage and had it not continued to convert people in the pagan world, we would have remained a completely marginal religion, if we survived at all”. Shlomo Sand interviewed by Ofri Ilany 21.03.2008 https://www.haaretz.com/1.5006910.

« …The ‘Jewish people’ is a made-up notion, consisting of an imaginary past with very little to back it up forensically, historically or textually. Furthermore, Sand, who elaborated on early sources from antiquity, comes to the conclusion that Jewish exile is also a myth, and that the present-day Palestinians are far more likely to be the descendants of the ancient Semitic people in Judea/Canaan than the current, predominantly Khazarian-origin Ashkenazi crowd which he belongs to himself […] The Jews of Spain, widely believed to be blood relatives of the ancient Israelites appear to be converted Berbers. […] Sand leaves us with the inevitable conclusion that contemporary Jews do not have a common origin, that their Semitic origins are a myth. Jews have no origin in Palestine whatsoever, and therefore their act of so-called ‘return’ must be realised as pretext for tribal expansioniste invasion. Although Jewish-ness does not contitute any racial continuum, the Jewish identity is racially orientated. Many Jews, even secular ones, continue to regard mixed marriage as the ultimate threat. Furthermore, in spite of modernisation, the vast majority of secular Jews continue to enact the blood ritual of circumcision …». (Extracts pages 135-145 The Wandering Who – a Study of Jewish Identity Politics Zero Books 2011)

Going back to «predestination». You may not believe this, but what has been done, can be undone and maybe you are unnecessarily imbued with pessimism or simply overawed by the snake oil salesmen and women and their hasbara. Within the NATO bloc and to a possibly lesser extent in Russia (which has its hate speech laws too !), free-thinking goyim of all persuasions, critical of Israel and of the materialism of the Zionist theocracy/ Talmudic ideology – are being progressively marginalized, outlawed, persecuted judicially. For example in France all religious signs, except the kippa, are officially banned. But, if you step outside the media bubble, you realise that the Masonic and Chabad-Lubavitch sects are over reaching themselves with their violent atheistic creed (NB Atheism is a so-called secular belief system which, in the light of its obsessive enforcement, can be usefully classed as a religious doxa) and the imposition throughout Greater Paris of their Hanukkah celebration in December 2017 (Cf. references infra). As per the CIA World Factbook, France has a composition of 63-66% Christians, 23-28% non religious people, and 7-9% Muslims in the general population. I find this on wikipedia :

«According to a Eurobarometer survey conducted in 2010, 27% of French citizens responded that they “believe there is a God”, 27% answered that they “believe there is some sort of spirit or life force”, and 40% answered that they “do not believe there is any sort of spirit, God, or life force”. This makes France one of the most irreligious countries in the world». Eurobarometer on Biotechnology” (PDF). Special Eurobarometer (341). European Commission. October 2010. p. 381.

Straw polls being what they are, who does one believe ? As reported by the census of 2014, France boasts a population of 66,259,012. There exists here a 465,000 strong hard core Jewish population, with an enlarged Jewish population, numbering 600,000. However short of mass conversions to Judaic rites, the figures speak for themselves. The unease is palpable, whenever you broach the issues of censorship and a ‘Jewish omnipresence’ in the news, media, financial and entertainments industries. You are greeted with frowns and embarrassed silences. But deep down the more articulate members of the public acknowledge the existential threat to their lives.

Mature minds can take heart from the importance and popularity of Mary/Maryam, Mariam, Meryem (مريم ) and īsā ibn Maryam or Jesus (عيسى بن مريم) in Islamic, Christian and especially Palestinian traditions to beat the hate merchants. (Cf, Gospel of James infra). Meantime we must contend with a regression to infantilism via the devirilisation and feminisation of impressionable youngsters, via the action of dissolute or otherwise disreputable rôle models. Hence the task we must all shoulder to counter this poisonous ‘soft power’ and its ‘expanding bullets’. I suggest, for a start, we keep plugging the remarkable work of Shlomo Sand.

Shattering a ‘National Mythology’ The Jewish people was never dispersed and never exiled, declares Prof. Shlomo Sand in his startling new book. Furthermore, it is more likely that the Palestinians, and not the Jews, have descended from ancient Judaic peoples Ofri Ilany 21.03.2008 https://www.haaretz.com/1.5006910.

Hanukkah (/ˈhɑːnəkə/ HAH-nə-kə; Hebrew: חֲנֻכָּה‬ khanuká, Tiberian: khanuká, usually spelled חנוכה‎, pronounced [χanuˈka] in Modern Hebrew, [ˈχanukə] or [ˈχanikə] in Yiddish; a transliteration also romanized as Chanukah or Ḥanukah) is a Jewish holiday commemorating the rededication of the Holy Temple (the Second Temple) in Jerusalem at the time of the Maccabean Revolt against the Seleucid Empire. Hanukkah is observed for eight nights and days, starting on the 25th day of Kislev according to the Hebrew calendar, which may occur at any time from late November to late December in the Gregorian calendar. It is also known as the Festival of Lights and the Feast of Dedication. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanukkah.

The Gospel of James, also known as the Infancy Gospel of James or the Protoevangelium of James, is an apocryphal Gospel probably written about AD 145, which expands backward in time the infancy stories contained in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, and presents a narrative concerning the birth and upbringing of Mary herself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_James.

TWMNS,
I do not mean to argue but to add to your point. I’d like to repeat that idea of ancient Israel is nothing but a hoax.
The land of today’s Palestine was populated by the Greeks called either the Sea People and generally speaking Philistines hence the name Palestini (in Greek).
I’ll give the “microphone” to Haaretz:https://www.haaretz.com/1.4970867
Hebrews were nothing but small groups of converts among local population, engaged in looting caravans.

I knew that German was the word XXX – possibly because I’ve read Steiner – and he spoke about the hatred for German people before and during the war – it was propaganda coming out of the London Times mostly – was my understanding – the newspaper owned by Cecil Rhodes.

And another interesting book that I’ve heard about and looked into but haven’t studies YET – is ‘The International Jew’ by Henry Ford. Gilad Atzmon refers to it respectfully in his book – ‘Being In Time’ –

Just exactly how can such in intense hatred be viewed logically and published as such, especially in a lane (USA) that has a very high percentage of German descendants. In fact there was a time in the US when the question arose in regard to what the US national language should be, German or English.

But this then poses another thought; as the Ashkenazi are considered the 13th tribe, and not actually of the Hebrew (sematic) race, This would mean that the core of this hatred is not DNA but rather within the theology and perhaps could be compared with Lot’s entry into Sodom and Gomorrah.

There is one other item to consider here which is again a Hebrew invention; ‘collective guilt’. It is another fascinating subject and a foundation of Christian theology.

So after surviving the sermon, the congregation sings; ‘Jesus loves the little children’, and fails to recognise the disparities of the lesson.

“Just exactly how can such in intense hatred be viewed logically and published as such, especially in a lane (USA) that has a very high percentage of German descendants. In fact there was a time in the US when the question arose in regard to what the US national language should be, German or English.”

Andrew, you do know how the concentration camps were setup in the US for Japanese and German US citizens during WW II ?

XXX stands for Germany, stands for all indigenous people, stands for the whole of humanity, nature, the natural law.

The Jewish Mafia as the only money supplier and interest & tax collector of the world has to go against natural law by definition. Only weaponized and monetized humanity (= citizens, legal persons) and nature (=resources) serves its project of monopolistic world domination by Maritime Law.

XXX = Germany is therefore just another Kabbalistic lie, the usual faux discourse, a classic Sabbatean inversion to hide the fact that XXX stands ultimately for existence or God, the natural enemies of the Talmudic Mafia.

“the fangs of the XXX” sound to me very much like the subtle Serpent which tempted Adam & Eve, and brought about “Man’s First Disobedience” and the Fall. So I guess “the nation of XXX” are the totality of men and women who are not yet convinced that “the goal of civilization is neither gas nor electric nor solar nor nuclear power; the aim of civilization is to diminish the traces of Original Sin” — Charles Baudelaire.

It is astonishingly easy to stir up the primitive reflex of Apart Hate; whether inside Germany (as in the Nazi era) or against Germany (as in the AZC propaganda campaign of 1900-1914 which culminated in WW1, and this Jew inspired but Anglo approved propaganda of 1941 WW2). The same primitive antipathy is being stirred up today by the same AZC in preparation for WW3 against Russia. Quote with present name for XXX: “Because she made no effort thousands of years ago to become civilized, Russia today is an outsider among all civilized nations.”

Now imagine as a blogger you come across this Kaufman travesty, decide to substitute Israel for Germany and publish it on your blog. What’s right for the goose, etc. etc. But no, it’s okay to hate Germans, vilify them for no apparent reason and try to have them exterminated.

This blogger has been accused of hate speech by the usual suspects and dragged through the courts here in Canada. He lost against B’nai B’rith and we lost another informative blog which was killed by the chosen thought patrol.

Apparently, what’s good for the goose is not good for the gander. I think J. Moglia has it right when he calls it “projection”. People sometimes don’t realize or want to admit to their own dark side and throw it out on whoever they deem to be “deserving”. Very low spiritual understanding on their part.

A very thought provoking article on hate that even dares to mention U.S. President Trump’s pious, handsome telegenic, Jewish daughter and son-in-law. A very timely comment on, of, the U.S. hegemonic global power or abuse of it, whichever the reader espouses. Considering or reconsidering the U.S. new Jerusalem Embassy, Jerusalem being the Palestinian capital too, raises unique, needed, international questions, currently
denied space by the U.S media and U.S. vassal states.

J.M.,
Think more positive as you no doubt have way more readers than 25. I can be included in those 25, as I always enjoy your articles. Thanks for your great work. I do not think I need to say anything else regarding what you wrote.

In his book Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil, Gerard Menuhin, son of the virtuoso, quotes Vladimir Jabotinsky from 1934:

‘For months now the struggle against Germany is waged by each Jewish community, at each conference, in all our syndicates, and by each Jew all over the world…We will trigger a spiritual and material war of all the world against Germany’s ambitions to become once again a great nation, to recover lost territories and colonies. But our Jewish interests demand the complete destruction of Germany. Collectively and individually, the German nation is a threat to us Jews.’

Actually, one thing I’ve always loved about good science fiction is that a good author can take issues that surround them on planet Earth and by moving them off into space and onto other planets can achieve a more realistic discussion that bypasses most people’s inherent prejudices and bigotry.

For example, while America was having race riots in the 1960’s, the original Star Trek show did an episode on race. They did so by having two characters, and each was in both clothing and make-up colored white on one half of their body and black on the other half of the body. The Enterprise encounters these two, and Captain Kirk is confused by their obvious racial hatred for each other and declares that they are ‘both alike’. The characters are both immediately offended, and say “can’t you see, he’s white on the left side of his body and I’m white on the right side of his body.” And vice versa of course. While of course claiming that this difference makes the other obviously inferior.

The two characters had been chasing each other across the galaxy trying to kill each other for decades, and thus Captain Kirk decides to relieve himself of this problem by taking them back to their home world. When they get there, they find the planet has been made a smoking, depopulated ruin by the wars that stemmed from this hatred.

Curious. The author is purportedly – according to the introduction Saker gives – merely illustrating a certain “mind-set”.
Yet it reads to me as though this “mind-set” belongs to one group of people. Now, I have to use that word, because it is the group of people that springs to mind. This is Jews.
However, as far as I can see, these are only certain Jews, – oddballs at best, maniacs at worst. Every nation has it’s extremists – one has to ask ” are they what defines the entire nation”? I don’t believe so – yet this cleverly written article, purporting to just highlight a generalised mind-set, manages to point a finger just one way . To Jews.
However, I’m afraid the idea of sterilization of peoples is an old one – and it was derived from the works of Darwin [whom, I am sure, would have been turning in his grave]. It is “survival of the fittest’. Such luminaries as Margaret Mead and Churchill subscribed to it. The “unfit”, the “useless eaters” should be sterilized out of existence, was the meme. I used to wonder where such a crazy idea had come from in Nazi Germany, until I learned that the Germans learned it from the Americans.
Across decades, thousands of Americans were sterilized against their will, even until recently. There are states with laws still on the books allowing judges to make rulings enforcing sterilization. Mostly of mentally afflicted women, I might add.
So, the fact that one nutty Jew wanted to extend this to Germans isn’t actually out of place. He was “of his time”. It was being done extensively in America and other places – even Australia – at the time he wrote of this.
So – if you want to highlight a mind-set and not a particular group of people, it would seem to me that you need to give examples of ALL the people who carry this mind-set, and try to identify where it’s common root lies.
Otherwise it could look as though you are trying to generate antipathy to all 6 million of a particular group of peoples.
Incidentally – I’m not trying to reject the argument, and I’m most certainly not stupid.
But I do see a slight flaw, so I’m pointing it out.

The idea of “The final solution” is only one aspect of the raw hate we witness here.
The rest of it speaks for itself…
Mind ya, @ the time of it’s publishing, none of the labour camps were operational.
One must ask, what was first? The egg or the chicken?

At the time of publishing, America was in full flood with forced sterlizations – the precursor to the Labour Camps.
Another thing it would be useful to study is the treatment of Jewish people down the centuries. Unremittingly, they have been excluded from work, places to live, social interaction, lifestyles, and even life. In 14C England during a “Holocaust” rather like the one we have brewing now, all local Jews, women and children alike, were herded into a wooden church, locked in and fired.

You know, If I’d been treated like utter sh*t for centuries, I dont think I’d be feeling very warm towards people like the Germans, who were blaming me and my kind for everything, just as people as doing now to Russia. [
the movie “Ship of Fools” was set in 1933 – before the Camps were operational. A character in it blames the bicycle riders for something. The “redneck” German says, “why the bicycle riders? to which the instigator replies “why the Jews”? Blaming Jews was in full swing before the Camps].

I make it clear, I have no time for Israel, which frequently gives me the feeling of “where’s a meteor strike when you really need one”, nor of political Zionists who seek control. Just as I have no time for American grunts who do Mai Lai incidents, come to think of it, or Anglo’s in Washington who exercise massive control.
As I said, If you want to examine a mind-set, you need to look at where, the world over, you find it; and what might be some of the factors contributing to it.

You know, If I’d been treated like utter sh*t for centuries, I dont think I’d be feeling very warm towards people like the Germans, who were blaming me …

Which human being lives that long? For centuries there were squabbles between France and Germany. Am I (a German) angry at the French? No! I’m not even angry at the Occupation of the Ruhr or the French Occupied Zone after WW II. Peoples emotions aren’t the sum of the experiences of their ancestors. Ruthless politicians use historical events for agitation. Sadly they’ve been quite successful over course of time (history books are full of this stuff).

Anon, Well said. The other $hit is just a lame excuse to for the chosenites to murder all the “lesser” species. Particularly the ones who stand on their way to World Domination. Right now it’s the Russians as the XXX are under total control.

If youi’re a German, I’m not surprised. You are well known to be a cold, detached people unable to empathise with the emotions of others, as shown by your cold blooded murder of millions during WWII [how’s that generalisation feel now??]\
I’m Welsh. And believe me, I feel the injustices brought by your genetic brothers the AngloSaxons, another bunch of cold blooded thieves and killers. For hundreds of years we’ve laboured unther their attempts at genocide, banning our language, invading our sacred land to make filthy coal mines which killed out people and scarred the green valleys, of being called thieves and idiots. And I feel this now as much as my forbears did and still feel the anger at them.
But then again, we are noted for our empathy and soul.
You keep going with your “Jew hatred”. Sign of a sick SoB if ever there was one.
And when angry crowds start dragging innocent young mothers out of their homes to kill them because they “Jews” – remember, you carry blame.
Not that you will care, it seems.

may I ask to which comment you’re referring to? If you’re assuming jd (on May 28, 2018 ·at 3:25 pm EST/EDT) is the same person who commented as Anonymous (on May 28, 2018 · at 9:15 pm EST/EDT), then I’ve got to disappoint you. I don’t agree with jd’s comment at all, but that hadn’t been the reason for writing a comment of my own. I wanted to add my opinion regarding the idea that experiences of the ancestors get handed down to the respective descendants.

I’m pretty sure that I would qualify for that “Aryan certificate” (on a side-note: afaik the word Aryan had been used quite in a misleading way). I’m even more sure that you don’t know anything about my grandparents, so you don’t seem to be qualified to judge their assumed actions during WW II by their citizenship. If you think that I’m hating Jews that’s okay with me (afaik that’s called guilt by association). It’s not my duty to tell you otherwise.

P.S.: I’m also the author of the other two Anonymous comments (not to confuse with Anonius) in your subthread. :)

This conversation is getting very personal – please end it now. Isabella your comment breaks the moderation policy – any further comments breaking moderation policy will all go to trash.

But you cannot go around today sterilising the ‘unfit’ or the ‘useless eaters’. You cannot do that, as that would destroy the very people who vote for the ‘left’ (Liberals in the US and Labor in Australia).

Why, it would even destroy the ‘Intellectual Ignoramus’ who had learnt everything from books but knows nought.

But you cannot go around today sterilising the ‘unfit’ or the ‘useless eaters’.

Are you sure? Search the internet for the keywords Peru sterilization program or the “mistake” to use unsuitable vaccines in Mexico and Kenya (https://www.globalresearch.ca/is-the-un-using-vaccines-to-secretly-sterilize-women-all-over-the-globe/5413599). In the US people are kicked off the SNAP program, while other countries let the undesired starve to death (for example Africa). Iraqis, Syrians and Serbs will have to live for a long time with the side-effects of depleted uranium ammunition. All the Western instigated / assisted wars resemble slow motion genocides. Of course, you cannot do all that stuff in the open, you’ve to skillfully hide your actions.

You cannot do that, as that would destroy the very people who vote for the ‘left’

The left is far from perfect, but those who vote the left aren’t the “unfit” or “useless eaters”. Most of them are discouraged so that they don’t bother to vote anymore.

The Intellectual Ignoramus is as bad as the non-intellectual uninformed. The latter one only knows books from the outside and doesn’t see the need for a minimum of knowledge.

” I used to wonder where such a crazy idea had come from in Nazi Germany, until I learned that the Germans learned it from the Americans.”
It was called EUGENICS brought to You by Rockefeller Foundation.

The collection of writings about Abraham the Hebrew and his descendants is recorded in the Tanakh. For centuries this anthological tome is referred to as the Hebrew Bible, not the Jewish Bible.

There were 12 sons of Jacob (Israel), yet contemporary history is primarily focused on just the Judeans who claim to be the successors of Judah, the last remaining Hebrew tribe. Surely the progeny of Asher, Benjamin, Dan, Ephraim, Gad, Issachar, Manasseh, Naphtali, Reuben, Simeon and Zebulun have a stake to land in modern Israel.

Why haven’t these other “chosen ones” spoken up and demanded their share of the promised land? Perhaps Mr. Moglia could investigate where they are living because they must exist somewhere. The Jews would have a very difficult time denying their Hebrew blood relatives the same rights of land ownership they enjoy today.

The offspring of these 11 other tribes need to come forward and demand their rightful heritage that God blessed them with too. The myth of them being “lost” is a fallacy and it would certainly shake Israel to its foundational roots and deservedly so.

The difficulty in understanding and appreciating Jimmy’s contribution is made more difficult by his inaccurate, a-historical out-of-context presentation of facts. If Jimmy is talking about a particular mind-set, perhaps he should say what it is, illustrate it, criticize it, address how representative it is among a people—here Jews are that people—instead of writing something that is far too easily and reasonably taken as anti-Jewish propaganda. For instance,

[BEGIN QUOTE] For Judea, as a super-national body, had already declared war on Germany in 1933, as reported by various newspaper headlines. For example,

“Judea Declares War on Germany” (Daily Express, March 24, 1933) –
or by The Vancouver Express,
“War to Death Against the German People,” etc. [END QUOTE]

Jimmy gives the impression that the Jews collectively are as guilty as the Germans of waging a war against an entire people, and also manages to give the impression that they started it. Perhaps Jimmy never heard of Mein Kampf, wherein Hitler expressed what he planned to do to the Jews once he came to power, and quickly began to do so once he came to power—before the Jews organized an economic boycott against Germany in respone. See below:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Nazi_boycott_of_1933 [BEGIN QUOTE] The Anti-Nazi Boycott of 1933 was a boycott of German products by foreign critics of the Nazi Party in response to an organized campaign of violence and boycotting undertaken by Hitler’s Nazi Party against the Jews of Germany following his appointment as Chancellor of Germany on January 30, 1933. Those in the United Kingdom, United States and other places worldwide who opposed Hitler’s antisemitic policies developed the boycott and its accompanying protests to encourage Nazi Germany to end the regime’s often-expressed anti-Jewish attitude.[END QUOTE]

https://www.ushmm.org/outreach/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007693 [BEGIN QUOTE] Jews held important positions in government and taught in Germany’s great universities. Of the thirty-eight Nobel Prizes won by German writers and scientists between 1905 and 1936, fourteen went to Jews. Marriage between Jews and non-Jews was becoming more common. Although German Jews continued to encounter some discrimination in their social lives and professional careers, most were confident of their future as Germans. They spoke the German language and regarded Germany as their home.

When the Nazis came to power, the lives of German Jews changed drastically. On April 1, 1933, the Nazis carried out the first nationwide, planned action against them: a boycott of Jewish businesses. Nazi spokesmen claimed the boycott was an act of revenge against both German Jews and foreigners, including US and English journalists, who had criticized the Nazi regime. On the day of the boycott, Storm Troopers stood menacingly in front of Jewish-owned shops. The six-pointed “Star of David ” was painted in yellow and black across thousands of doors and windows. Signs were posted saying “Don’t Buy from Jews” and “The Jews Are Our Misfortune.” [END QUOTE]

Jimmy also states:

[BEGIN QUOTE] As I read, “Chabad Lubavitch is today one of the world’s best known Hasidic movements and is well known for its outreach.” And in the “Jewish Week,” a well-known Jewish publication in the United States, we find statements as follow, made by Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburgh, belonging to the Chabad Lubavitch movement. “If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an innocent non-Jew passing by to save him? The Torah would probably permit that. Jewish life has an infinite value. There is something infinitely more holy and unique about Jewish life than non-Jewish life.”[END QUOTE]

In 2016 the New York publication “Jewish Week” merged with the “Times of Israel.” Ten minutes of creative searching on two search engines could not find the quote attributed to the Rabbi from that publication. The quote itself, however, is easily located and attributed to the Rabbi without citation, as part of an anti-Jewish smear propaganda effort in which the Rabbi himself is shown in a photo allegedly giving a Satanic hand sign.http://www.whale.to/c/yitzchak_ginzburg.html [BEGIN QUOTE] [Organ Harvesting] “If a Jew needs a kidney, is it allowed, in order to save his life, to take the kidney from a Goy (non-Jew), passing by, even if he is not guilty of anything? In my opinion, Torah allows it. The life of a Jew is priceless”– Lubavitcher rabbi Yitzchak Ginsburgh [END QUOTE]

One has no idea whether this is truth or webspit—and Jimmy gives us no way to find out, but fortunately Alison Weir, a first-rate scholar of Zionist exceptionalism, archived the entire “Jewish Week” article from April 26, 1996 and the horror is far worse than the incendiary quotes Jimmy gave. Israel had tried to suppress the Rabbi’s noxious teachings by putting him in administrative detention, but the Supreme Court ordered his release after three weeks of detention. Ironically, this is the first time that administrative detention had ever been successfully challenged in Israel. Rabbi Ginsburgh does not unequivocally represent Jewish thought, as the article quotes Rabbi Walter Wurzburger, a professor of philosophy at Yeshiva University and former president of the Rabbinical Council of America, the Orthodox Zionist rabbinic body, “Even the devil can quote Scripture.” In Rabbi Wurzburger’s his view, Ginsburgh is the devil.

“If you have two people drowning, a Jew and a non-Jew, the Torah says you save the Jewish life first,” Rabbi Ginsburgh told The Jewish Week. ”If every single cell in a Jewish body entails divinity, is a part of God, then every strand of DNA is a part of God. Therefore, something is special about Jewish DNA.”

Later, Rabbi Ginsburgh asked rhetorically, “If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an innocent non-Jew passing by to save him? The Torah would probably permit that. “Jewish life has infinite value,” explained. “There is something infinitely more holy and unique about Jewish life than non-Jewish life.”

Notwithstanding this, Rabbi Ginsburgh hastened to add that nothing in this view undermines the holiness of non-Jewish lives. “Just the opposite,” he insisted. ”…Ultimately the light they recognize from Jews will make their lives more valuable. Jews are essentially a giver nation. And non-Jews are receivers.”

Rabbi Ginsburgh is also an ardent sympathizer of Baruch Goldstein, the Brooklyn-born physician who massacred 29 Palestinians at prayer in a Hebron mosque in February 1994. While stopping short of endorsing Goldstein’s act outright, Rabbi Ginsburgh described him unambivalently as “a Jew who gave up his life for his people.” In a recent book devoted to Goldstein he called the massacre “an act of bravery whose source was divine grace.”

Citing explicit instructions he says he received from the late Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Ginsburgh has also strongly defended Jewish revenge attacks on Arabs, at least after-the-fact. Whether he would tell a Jew to engage in such a random attack beforehand “is a different story,” Rabbi Ginsburgh said. But after such an attack took place in response to an Arab provocation, “You can’t even hint it was a bad thing.”

Among other things, he explained, the jurisdiction of an Israeli court in such a case is illegitimate because “Legally, if a Jew does kill a non-Jew, he’s not called a murderer. He didn’t transgress the Sixth Commandment: Thou shalt not murder. This applies only to Jews killing Jews. Therefore [in a Jewish state], his punishment is given over to heaven” rather than to a secular court.

In 1989, Rabbi Ginsburgh was personally involved in the events that led to such a killing when he led a large group of his yeshiva students on an armed West Bank “walking tour” that slipped around Israeli Army restrictions and assertively through a Palestinian village. The tour ended in a melee that saw the rabbi stoned by angry villagers, the yeshiva boys rampaging through the village setting fires and vandalizing, and a 13-year-old Palestinian girl who was sitting in her house shot by one of the yeshiva tourists.

At the trial of the yeshiva boy charged with the killing, Rabbi Ginsburgh said bluntly, “The people of Israel must rise and declare in public that a Jew and goy are not, God forbid, the same. Any trial that assumes that Jews and goyim are equal is a travesty of justice.” [END QUOTE]

There are much better and historically accurate and pertinent accounts of the “mind-set” that Jimmy is trying to expose and condemn, including the genocidal mind set of the Zionists towards the Palestinians. Needless to say elsewhere, but necessary to say here, most of them are not connected with Zionism, but Christianity and imperialism generally. Some of these reduce the Palestinians to “cockroaches” needing to be exterminated, but others are more cold-blooded and in their own way more respectful, as Jabotinsky’s 1923 classic “The Iron Wall” that states in pertinent part:

[BEGIN QUOTE] We can talk as much as we want about our good intentions; but they understand as well as we what is not good for them. They look upon Palestine with the same instinctive love and true fervor that any Aztec looked upon his Mexico or any Sioux looked upon his prairie. To think that the Arabs will voluntarily consent to the realization of Zionism in return for the cultural and economic benefits we can bestow on them is infantile. This childish fantasy of our “Arabo-philes” comes from some kind of contempt for the Arab people, of some kind of unfounded view of this race as a rabble ready to be bribed in order to sell out their homeland for a railroad network. [END QUOTE] http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/quot-the-iron-wall-quot

Jabotinsky continues to explain how the Palestinians must be smashed by force until all hope is extinguished, and as for the morality of this effort, he exclaims, “We hold that Zionism is moral and just. And since it is moral and just, justice must be done, no matter whether Joseph or Simon or Ivan or Achmet agree with it or not. There is no other morality.”

The Zionist cold-blooded seizure and murder in turn is justified by a palpable sense of Jews as a chosen people simply seeking justice for itself at the expense of others whose resistance must be destroyed, which Jabotinsky justified anew in “The Ethics of the Iron Wall.”

[BEGIN QUOTE] Yet if homeless Jewry demands Palestine for itself it is “immoral” because it does not suit the native population. Such morality may be accepted among cannibals, but not in a civilised world. The soil does not belong to those who possess land in excess but to those who do not possess any. It is an act of simple justice to alienate part of their land from those nations who are numbered among the great landowners of the world, in order to provide a place of refuge for a homeless, wandering people. And if such a big landowning nation resists which is perfectly natural – it must be made to comply by compulsion. Justice that is enforced does not cease to be justice. This is the only Arab policy that we shall find possible. [END QUOTE] http://www.jabotinsky.org/multimedia/upl_doc/doc_191207_181762.pdf

In 2008 ex-Mossad chief Efraim Halevy gave almost an identical justification for destroying the Palestinian society on Hebrew Nation Radio, on “Walter’s World.”

“If there is anything that frightens me in the remembrance of the Holocaust, it is discerning nauseating processes that took place in Europe in general, and in Germany specifically back then, 70, 80 and 90 years ago, and seeing evidence of them here among us in the year 2016.” https://thefreethoughtproject.com/idf-chief-israel-speech/

If the rise of the Nazis elicited this boycott of Germany by Jewish globalists, then who facilitated the rise of the Nazis? The Nazis were an absurdity; an aberration that should never have gained traction and yet they conquered Germany. Sounds like a bankster-run dialectic to me. Even Herzl stated that anti-semitism should be a tool of Zionism.

Israel is the result of two World Wars and that’s a fact you cannot debunk; from the Balfour Declaration to the Zionist-Nazi collaboration during WWII, these bloody wars were the high road to Israel, and many Jews were sacrificed by Zionists for their goal. Something smells and it is called Modern History.

I read only about half of the quotes and I guessed that the people/nation implied ought to be the jews. the quotes apply perfectly to present day zionism. The book is still relevant today, it just takes to rearrange the title to “israel must perish” and make the necessary corrections in the body text.

The Jewish hatred for Germany stems from a crushing sense of inferiority. In music, the Jews never produced a Mozart, Beethoven or Bach. In philosophy, they never produced a Kant, Shopenhauer, or Nietschze. And in technology, the Germans created the automobile (Otto, Benz, etc.) while the Jews were not part of this science.

So the Jewish reaction was, quite simply, a passive aggressive genocide of the German people: i.e. playing neighboring nations off one another for financial gain and using the Jewish-controlled press to stoke the fire. WW1 and WW2 are the result of Jewsih machinations that stem from a jealous hatred of the German people

“The Jewish hatred for Germany stems from a crushing sense of inferiority. In music, the Jews never produced a Mozart, Beethoven or Bach. In philosophy, they never produced a Kant, Shopenhauer, or Nietschze. And in technology, the Germans created the automobile (Otto, Benz, etc.) while the Jews were not part of this science”.

The doppelgänger effect of this pathological envy is an overwhelming sense of superiority, a contempt for, not only Germans, their music and philosophers, but for humankind at large and a split personality (Cf. infra).

While Ashkenazim aped and jabbered German with their yiddish dialect cum language, their Germanophobia was equal to, if not superseded by, Russophobia. Except that many Russian speaking Israeli settlers now fail to master Hebrew and continue to communicate in Russian. There is moreover, one field of technological research in which Askenazi people – shone : nuclear physics. Hence the Manhattan project reminds us of the lengths to which the unholy marriage between Protestant Ethics and the Synagogue of Satan has gone to subdue ordinary
mortals – including, one must add, millions of common or garden assimilated Jews, unable to fully integrate human society ie extricate themselves from the dictates of the Hasklalah (enlightenment) preached by the 18th century Jewish scholar Moses Mendelssohn : “Be a Jew at home and a Goy in the street”. Thus :

«The Haskalah Jew is destined to live in a dual, deceptive mode, if not practically a state of schizophrenia. He is split between the solitary pleasure of a cosy, homely Jewish identity and the public appearance of the surrounding reeality. The Hasklalah Jew is deceiving his or her God when at home and misleading the Goy in the street. In fact, it is this duality of tribalism and universalism that is at the very heart of thee collective secular Jewish identity. This duality has never been properly resolved. Instead of redeeming the Jews, it imposes a ceertain level of dishonesty». Gilad Atzmon on pages 55-56 of The Wandering Who ? (Zero Books 2011)

A corollary of this is our world held hostage by the spectre of ‘intellectual and physically manifest terrorism’ or to quote a French public prosecutor ‘endogenous terrorism’. Thus are we implicitly threatened by one François Molins (Cf. infra), a sinister personage recalling the mien of Jean-Baptiste_Carrier (1756-1794) responsible for numerous murders, especially of priests and nuns, as well as of women and children, known as the Drownings at Nantes (Noyades), and who ended up on the guillotine. Terrorism in 21st Century France, Belgium and elsewhere in Europe is an ordeal varying in intensity from the day-to-day torture of inhabiting a cognitive madhouse as we are confronted by the fairground like displays from political contortionists and their smoke and mirrors, ie our daily sensory diet from the mass media circus – an experience designed to paralyze meaningful dissent and escalating potentially to phases of substantive physical assault and battery, periods of detention and even death or injury from an assassin’s knife, bullet or bomb. This is the prism through which critics of Israel, Jewish identity politics and the holocaust religion must expect to apprehend reality, along with a sense of the hideous carnage inflicted gratuitously upon any number of non-Jewish populations worldwide, notably those living anywhere between the Pillars of Hercules and the Hindu Kush (Persian : هندوکش, hindi : हिन्दु कुश).

As Amazon has started removing reams of literature challenging la pensée unique and political correctness, to conclude slightly off topic, but not althogether, let me recommend a little online reading, as the show goes on :

As usual, when someone attempts to large groups of people and then assigning characteristics to the lot, they only end seeming to be, well, wrong.

As to “the Jews” not being good at science….I’ll give you just one name …. Albert Einstein.

The lesson is, people are individuals. If one tries to refer to them in large groups, then about all one can accurately say is “they all need to breath oxygen”.

The culture people are brough up in does make a bit of a difference, but there will always be “black sheep” who reject their culture. If genetics makes a difference, its a small one. Remember, there would always be bell curves on either side of the mean, so even if you could prove the mean for group A was a bit different from the mean of group B, the extent of the bell curve of real, actual individuals in each group would means that some of a group with a lower mean would massively outperform most of the group with the higher mean.

And thus, the person who tries to say that everyone in group A is better or worse than everyone in group B will be, well, wrong.

I’ve read the 33 comments posted at this point. None has mentioned that the U.S, policy toward Germany right after WWII was the Morganthau Plan. (A similar plan was put in place for Japan.) The idea was to destroy both nations’ potential to ever revive. (This is not crank stuff. You can Google it.) The basic idea was to starve them to death, leaving those lands devoid of people, and barren.

The hatred toward Germany (and Japan) was not exclusive to Jews.

If you wish to read some serious books on the subject, I strongly recommend the following:

Hellstorm – a book and DVD by Michael Goodrich, re. the annihilation of Germany via what can only be called war crimes.

Summer, 1945 – another book by Michael Goodrich, just published, that offers a good study of genocide against Germans and Japanese, especially in the final months of the war and in at least the first year of the Occupation of each country.

Warning: these works will make you want to throw up or cry or both. Don’t take them up on a full stomach.

Two aphorisms: (1) Napoleon: “History is the set of lies that have been agreed on.” (2) Churchill (I think): “The victors write the history. On the Memorial Day, when we glorify our fallen “warriors,” these works by Goodrich are a sober antidote to the myths.

Sitemap

Saker Android App

An Android App has been developed by one of our supporters. It is available for download and install by clicking on the Google Play Store Badge above.

All the original content published on this blog is licensed by Saker Analytics, LLC under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 4.0 International license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0). For permission to re-publish or otherwise use non-original or non-licensed content, please consult the respective source of the content.