If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

The F10 M5 in stock form will do about 120 traps through the 1/4 mile. A tuned C63 all motor is capable of 120+ trap speeds as well so everything adds up. The M5's curb weight hurts it a bit as it weighs in at over 4300 pounds. The C63 is no lightweight in the 39XX pound range but it is about 400 pounds lighter. Still, one would think with the huge power advantage even stock and the dual clutch transmission the M5 would be stronger.

me and him had battles with my 135i , I gotta give him a go with my e92 now but my damn car spins in third at 70mph now in this weather ....

Jons c63 is VERY quick, quicker than most if not all tune only c63s to that m5 actually is very strong... before i watched i expected jon to get a jump and hold it, surprised the m5 hung so well bc jons car is def quick.

The F10 M5 in stock form will do about 120 traps through the 1/4 mile. A tuned C63 all motor is capable of 120+ trap speeds as well so everything adds up. The M5's curb weight hurts it a bit as it weighs in at over 4300 pounds. The C63 is no lightweight in the 39XX pound range but it is about 400 pounds lighter. Still, one would think with the huge power advantage even stock and the dual clutch transmission the M5 would be stronger.

me and him had battles with my 135i , I gotta give him a go with my e92 now but my damn car spins in third at 70mph now in this weather ....

Jons c63 is VERY quick, quicker than most if not all tune only c63s to that m5 actually is very strong... before i watched i expected jon to get a jump and hold it, surprised the m5 hung so well bc jons car is def quick.

WOW. surprising! After seeing all the BS m5board videos and such, makes the 'stock' M5 seem super fast! But its power to weight only makes sense. Jon, I remember you raced a M6 once with a tune and exhaust, was it faster then this M5?

No I'm Stock turbos but I am #1 on the Vargas stage 2 turbos just like Rb's... Id run ya before to see how it compares tho :-)

I think my red car and my car now were very similar tho. This one just being quicker in the 1/4 due to the AT ... Not sure which is quicker off rolls but this one is tuned aggressively with e85 and stacked jb4 iso tune

WOW. surprising! After seeing all the BS m5board videos and such, makes the 'stock' M5 seem super fast! But its power to weight only makes sense. Jon, I remember you raced a M6 once with a tune and exhaust, was it faster then this M5?

No I'm Stock turbos but I am #1 on the Vargas stage 2 turbos just like Rb's... Id run ya before to see how it compares tho :-)

I think my red car and my car now were very similar tho. This one just being quicker in the 1/4 due to the AT ... Not sure which is quicker off rolls but this one is tuned aggressively with e85 and stacked jb4 iso tune

yea it works well and allows for more aggressive timing, but i still think these cars need meth ontop to assure consistancy and make up for weaker blends of e85... just my opinion though... but you can def make significantly more power over 93 with e85.

DD I just run a 50/50 blend of e85 but if i am going to race ill fill the trunk tank up and start using meth again... I never ran you with your upgraded tune in my red car before i ditched it so that kinda ruins the "which one of my cars was faster" test with you. This new e92 is def tuned more aggressive but is heavier but is also AT so i dont know which was faster... im assuming this one may be a smidge better from roll-ons too