Recent Posts

Sounds like DHS conducted a penetration test (which is something they do) on their network. Usually those are announced in advance and coordinated. If that's all it is, it's not a hacking attempt in the typical sense.
But it could have led to something more sinister if the test discovered vulner...

[quote]he government shouldn't allow private companies to fleece the American taxpayers on any contract[/quote]
This is how fed gov employees line up cushy retirement jobs. Fact.
Make someone rich, and they will hire you as a favor. ...

[quote]Debunked by whom? [/quote]
When the adjusted for orbital decay. The satellite was attempting to take a temp from the same location at the same time from the same place each day. But this assumes the satellite maintained a constant speed, which it doesn't. It slows down. So it was in fact s...

[quote]And there's also satellite data that says temps have decreased since 1979. [/quote]
Yeah - the troposphere measurements. There's explanations for it and when adjustements are made to account for the location of he satellite it actually supports the surface temp observations. ...

[quote]The agenda of the left is transparent. [/quote]
I agree that this is overly politicized by both parties, but NOAA (pretty nonpartisan agency) observed a 1- 1.4 degree increase in temps since 1900. Check out their site.
Normally that kind of increase takes about 1,000 years if you be...

[quote]But the geologic record doesn't allow one to deduce the cause! Scientists propose and debate the cause! Your argument is a straw dog, a great debate technique but the opposite of science proof.[/quote]
I never mentioned cause. I'm simply questioning whether or not anyone disputes the abili...

[quote]quote: So what is causing the rise in heat faster than at any point in recorded history
Your hyperbolic claim may well be untrue. No proxy has the type of resolution in time nor spatial distribution that the instrumental period does.[/quote]
So you're saying that geology and related fi...

[quote] Doesn't the increase in global temperatures also cause the increase in global humidity? thus creating more water in the atmosphere? So if GHG cause a slight bump in global temps, that also produces a slight bump in global humidity. Wouldn't this culminate in a vicious cycle which results i...

[quote]You're almost there, keep going. When the answer hits you a facepalm might be in order. What controls global temperature?[/quote]
Nice selective edit. The complete statement was that the temp controls the amount of water in the atmosphere.
Do you dispute that?
If not, then you'...

[quote] It simply isn't true.[/quote]
Water vapor has been around forever. If that were going to create a runaway greenhouse effect, don't you think it would have happened a few thousand, or a few hundred thousand, or a few million, or even a few hundred million years ago?
Not only does scie...

[quote]The effect of CO2 is monumentally dwarfed by something we have zero control over.[/quote]
Incorrect sir. While 60% of the daily greenhouse effect is attributed to water vapor, the amount in the atmosphere is controlled by the temperature and the rest condenses out to rain and clouds.
W...

[quote]You're talking out your ass[/quote]
Lol. You don't science do you.
Because water vapor is condensible it has an absolute limit. Atmospheric percentage isn't increasing every day unlike CO2. It is not a variable in the equation. ...

[quote]Which are you[/quote]
If this representation is even somewhat accurate, I'm concerned there's a strong possibility it's influenced by man and not "the climate has always changed"
[link=(http://xkcd.com/1732/)]LINK[/link]
...

[quote]Those who believed in the sun at the center were not telling the kings and popes to reduce the quality of life of the peasants![/quote]
I don't agree with the carbon tax, and I assume that's what your referencing here.
You can disagree with the solution, but that doesn't mean the probl...

Samos first proposed heliocentricity around 270 BC. Copernicus's observations strengthened the theory in a publication in 1543. Bruno was burned at the stake for advocating heliocentricity in 1600. In 1616, Galileo disproved Ptolemaic (Church) theory and was condemned by the church, leaving heliocen...

[quote]100% of those 99% scientists you cite have not proved this hypothesis [/quote]
That's because it's damn near impossible to prove scientifically, unlike the flat earth hypothesis.
There's plenty of evidence to point to a correlation that a lot of really smart people support. Plus there...