Sunday, February 17, 2013

THE MURDER RATE IN AMERICA IS SKEWED>>>> The Problem Isn't White People With Guns, It's Black People With Guns<<<< FACT.... JACK!! SIMPLE AS THAT !!
America has a "RACE RELATED" GUN MAYHEM PROBLEM a “ RACE demographic problem”
because “white populations” in the U.S. and Belgium had the same low
murder rate. GET THAT ??>>ITS THE BLACKS THAT SKEW THE STATISTIC<<<<<

The two graphs break down the rate by Whites and Blacks. Note
that the scale changes from picture to picture (the White rate is about a
tenth of the Black rate). There are two lines in each: the red line
shows the homicide rates (the “Killed”). The black line shows rate that
each group was the assailant (the “Killers”).

The First Picture shows the Homicide rates per 100,000 for Whites

Whites killed and are killed by about the same, and falling, rate.

The second Picture shows the Homicide rate per 100,000 for Blacks

Blacks kill at higher rates than they are killed. Interestingly, the
difference in the killer/killed rate appears roughly constant for most
years, and narrowing slightly in recent years.

SO IS THE PRACTICAL SOLUTION IS BANNING BLACKS FROM OWNING GUNS SO WE CAN BE MORE SAFE ?? ASK THE LEFT AND THEY WILL CALL YOU RACIST..BUT THEY ARE THE FACTS!!

SO WHAT DO YOU SAY LIBERAL BITCHES ???

Share the facts and statistics Patriots...

There is a *MAJOR* discrepancy between white and black murder rates.

The white murder rate is still around 3.5/100k.

Belgium: is 1.8/100k.

Blacks is 12.8/100k

CAN'T ARGUE STATISTICS....

WANT MORE STATS.. BREAK THE MURDER WITH GUNS RATE INTO CITIES IN THE USA!!

America's
gun murder rate, 4.7 per 100,000, which is "artificially higher than it should be
because it includes so many deadly, murderous, toxic AFROGHETTO places like…
Detroit, Michigan."

But Detroit is not the only socialist
infested city in America, whose rigorous gun control laws have borne the
fruit of murder. No, other heavily socialist controlled cities in
America bear similar fruit. For instance, here's other American cities
and their murder rates per year: Where the Progressives Control, and there are large numbers of low income illiterate Blacks in "vote slavery", the rate is phenomenally higher!!Example: New Orleans – 53.2 per 100,000 St. Louis – 35.5 per 100,000 Baltimore – 34.9 per 100,000 Newark - 34.4 per 100,000 Oakland – 31,8 per 100,000 Stockton – 23.7 per 100,000 Kansas City – 22.6 per 100,000 Philadelphia – 21.5 per 100,000 Cleveland – 21.3 per 100,000 Memphis – 20.2 per 100,000 Atlanta – 19.0 per 100,000 Chicago – 18.5 per 100,000

So when you consider that 4.7 per 100,000 actually includes these high crime areas,
which have been largely controlled by Progressives and Socialists you can see the race demographic clearly.

Why then is the
overall number of murders in America as low as it is? It's because of
largely of cities of legal Patriot Citizens where guns are lawfully carried and used. Here's just a
few of the cities cited and their murder rates based on 100,000 per
capita:

According
to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, between 1976 and 2011, there were
279,384 black murder victims. Though blacks are 13 percent of the
nation's population, they account for more than 50 percent of homicide
victims. Nationally, the black homicide victimization rate is six times
that of whites, and in some cities, it's 22 times that of whites.
Coupled with being most of the nation's homicide victims, blacks are
also most of the victims of violent personal crimes, such as assault and
robbery. The magnitude of this tragedy can be seen in another light.
According to a Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Institute study, between
1882 and 1968, 3,446 blacks were lynched at the hands of whites.

THATS RIGHT... between 1976 and 2011, there were 279,384 black murder victims.

and between 1882 and 1968, 3,446 blacks were lynched at the hands of whites.

Something
stinks... Its the liberal Lefty Culture and the Liberal education
system and the Democrats and their deviant lunatic culture that kills
blacks..SO WHAT DO WE BAN NOW OBAMA???There's a story
told about a Paris chief of police who was called to a department store
to stop a burglary in progress. Upon his arrival, he reconnoitered the
situation and ordered his men to surround the entrances of the building
next door. When questioned about his actions, he replied that he didn't
have enough men to cover the department store's many entrances but he
did have enough for the building next door. Let's see whether there are
similarities between his strategy and today's gun control strategy.

Last
year, Chicago had 512 homicides; Detroit had 411; Philadelphia had 331;
and Baltimore had 215. Those cities are joined by other dangerous
cities — such as St. Louis, Memphis, Tenn., Flint, Mich., and Camden,
N.J. — and they also lead the nation in shootings, assaults, rapes and
robberies. Both the populations of those cities and their crime victims
are predominantly black. Each year, more than 7,000 blacks are murdered.
Close to 100 percent of the time, the murderer is another black person.According
to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, between 1976 and 2011, there were
279,384 black murder victims. Though blacks are 13 percent of the
nation's population, they account for more than 50 percent of homicide
victims. Nationally, the black homicide victimization rate is six times
that of whites, and in some cities, it's 22 times that of whites.
Coupled with being most of the nation's homicide victims, blacks are
also most of the victims of violent personal crimes, such as assault and
robbery. The magnitude of this tragedy can be seen in another light.
According to a Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Institute study, between
1882 and 1968, 3,446 blacks were lynched at the hands of whites.

What
percentage of murders, irrespective of race, are committed with what
are being called assault weapons? You'd be hard put to come up with an
amount greater than 1 or 2 percent. In fact, according to FBI data from
2011, there were 323 murders committed with a rifle of any kind but 496
murders committed with a hammer or a club. But people who want to weaken
our Second Amendment guarantees employ a strategy like that of the
Paris chief of police. They can't do much about hammers, clubs, fists or
pistols, but by exploiting public ignorance, they might have a bit of
success getting an "assault weapon" ban that will have little impact on
violent crime.

There are other measures these people employ in an
attempt to end violence that border on lunacy. Massachusetts' Hyannis
West Elementary recently warned a 5-year-old's parents that if their son
made another gun from a Legos set, he'd be suspended. Elementary-school
children have been suspended or otherwise disciplined for drawing a
picture of a gun or pointing a finger and saying, "Bang, bang." I
shudder to think about what would happen to kids in a schoolyard if they
played, as I played nearly 70 years ago, "cops 'n' robbers" or "cowboys
'n' Indians." Maybe today's politically correct educators would cut the
kids a bit of slack if they said they were playing "cowboys 'n' Native
Americans."

What explains a lot of what we see today, which
politicians and their liberal allies would never condemn, is growing
cultural deviancy. Twenty-nine percent of white children, 53 percent of
Hispanics and 73 percent of black children are born to unmarried women.
The absence of a husband and father from the home is a strong
contributing factor to poverty, school failure, crime, drug abuse,
emotional disturbance and a host of other social problems. By the way,
the low marriage rate among blacks is relatively new. Census data show
that a slightly higher percentage of black adults had married than white
adults from 1890 to 1940. In 2009, the poverty rate among married
whites was 3.2 percent; for blacks, it was 7 percent, and for Hispanics,
it was 13.2 percent. The higher poverty rates — 22 percent for whites,
35.6 percent for blacks and 37.9 percent for Hispanics — are among
unmarried families.

Other forms of cultural deviancy are found in
the kind of music accepted today that advocates killing and rape and
other vile acts. Punishment for criminal behavior is lax. Today's
Americans accept behavior that our parents and grandparents never would
have accepted.

Obama Gunrunning To Al-QaedaIf
you were a sitting President and it was discovered that you were openly
supporting al-Qaeda—openly supplying them with weapons—what would you
do?

Since al-Qaeda is the sworn enemy of the United States, since
al-Qaeda has murdered countless Americans, and therefore supporting
al-Qaeda would be treason in every sense of the word, of course you
would resign or brace for impeachment.

But we’re not talking
about a normal President who operates within the confines of reason.
We’re talking about Barack Hussein Obama, who operates in a strange
Twilight Zone type of reality broadcast to the masses via his compliant
mainstream media.

The Syrian “rebels” have openly identified
themselves with al-Qaeda. They have openly said, “When We Finish With
Assad, We Will Fight the U.S.”, so it’s no secret they are the enemy.

And Barack Obama has been arming them.

And
this isn’t the first time. When Obama was basking in the light of his
“democratic moment” in arming the Libyan “rebels” to topple Gadaffi,
here again he was arming al-Qaeda.

The dirty little secret of
course is that the weapons that Barack Obama was lavishing on the
“democratic” rebels found their way into the hands of their sister
group, Ansar al-Sharia. Have you heard of them? They are the group that
murdered the four Americas at the Benghazi consulate and CIA annex—more
than likely with weapons Barack Obama supplied.

That’s the other
dirty little secret of why Obama refused to go into Benghazi to rescue
Americans in need: he was afraid his fingerprints would be found on the
weapons that were left behind when Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty had to
fight off the attack themselves.

So with Obama admitting that he is supplying arms to the Syrian al-Qaeda “Freedom Fighters”, what does he do?

Yesterday, he officially recognized the rebels as the “true” government of Syria.

$1,728,477,000,000: Fed’s Holdings of U.S. Debt Hit Another Record

IT TIME FOR REVOLUTION!!!

(CNSNews.com) - The Federal Reserve's holdings of U.S. government
debt climbed to yet another record this week, hitting
$1,728,477,000,000.00 by the close of business Wednesday, Feb. 13,
according to data released late Thursday by the Fed.
That was an increase of $10,734,000,000.00 from the close of business on the previous Wednesday.
As of Wednesday, the total debt of the federal government was
$16,524,304,599,079.04. That included $11,668,602,027,147.93 in debt
held by the public and $4,855,702,571,931.11 in intragovernmental debt,
which is money the Treasury has taken out of government trust
funds—such as the Social Security Trust Fund—and spent on other
government programs.
Since Jan. 2 of this year, the Federal Reserve has increased its
holdings of U.S. government debt by $62,359,000,000.00 At the same time,
the Treasury has increased the overall debt held by the public by
$87,084,476,752.86. Thus, the Federal Reserve has bought up the
equivalent of 71.6 percent of the publicly held debt that has been
issued by the Treasury so far this calendar year, and 14.8 percent of
all of the U.S. government's publicly held debt that is now extant.
On Jan. 30, the Fed said
it intended to buy $45 billion in federal government debt per month
with the aim of helping to insure economic growth at what it called a
“moderate pace” as well as an unemployment rate that would “gradually
decline.”
In the fourth quarter of 2012, the U.S. economy did not grow,
according to the Bureau of Economic Analsysis. On the contrary real GDP
declined by 0.1 percent. In January, according to the Bureau of Labor
Statistics, unemployment did not decline. In fact, it ticked up from 7.8
percent in December to 7.9 percent in January.
“The Committee expects that, with appropriate policy accommodation,
economic growth will proceed at a moderate pace and the unemployment
rate will gradually decline toward levels the Committee judges
consistent with its dual mandate,” the Federal Open Market Committee
said in a press release.

Crumbling Global Economy Passes Point of No Return

As bad as the global economy is right now, it is unfortunately
going to get far worse. Many central banks around the world are now
racing to devalue their currencies through the implementation of debt
monetization programs and low interest rates. Despite statements coming out of the G20 saying otherwise, many insiders and former insiders are fully admitting that there is an on-going global currency war and that this war is accelerating. The Bank of Japan’s recent announcement of a massive bond purchase program
is the latest episode in an already sorry state of affairs. It is a
historical fact that prosperity has never been obtained by devaluing a
nation’s money which makes it all the more insane that the central
planners are actually trying to sell the general public on these
policies. In fact if monetary devaluation resulted in economic growth,
Zimbabwe which recently experienced a period of rampant hyperinflation
would easily be the wealthiest nation in the world instead of one of the
poorest. Ancient Rome had a strong monetary unit when the nation rose
to prominence but degenerated after the ruling powers decided to devalue
its coinage. In more recent times both the British Empire and the
United States reached great heights when they maintained a sound money
system. With this said, you really don’t need to be an economics guru to
figure out that the result of today’s monetary policies will eventually
result in a complete disaster for the global economy.Despite all of the absurd propaganda from the major news networks,
there is no question that much of the world is in a depression. The only
reason there has not been a total collapse of the system is because of
the fact that central banks have maintained artificially low interest
rates and propped up sovereign bond markets by purchasing bonds with
money that they created out of nothing. Taxpayer bailouts, stimulus
programs and other nonsense haven’t helped matters either. These
policies which were implemented following the crash of 2008 have simply
set the world up for a much larger collapse in the future. There would
have at least been an outside chance to fix the system had the central
planners not intervened but now the situation is becoming increasingly
hopeless. Take for example what happened in Iceland immediately
following the 2008 financial crisis. The Icelandic people voted against using taxpayer money to prop up failed Icelandic banks.
Even though there was a great deal of short term economic pain with
foreign depositors and foreign bond holders losing billions, the country is now on the road to recovery.On the other hand, Ireland which decided to bailout its banking
system with taxpayer money is still dealing with the after effects of
the crisis. In 2010, Ireland actually had to accept a bailout from the
European Union and the International Monetary Fund because the
government could no longer afford the burden. Just weeks ago thousands of people rightfully filled the streets of Irish cities protesting against the bank bailouts.
Before the bailouts, Ireland had one of the stronger economies in the
European Union with one of the lowest debt-to-GDP ratios in Europe.
After the bailouts, the Irish economy has struggled even being mentioned
in the same breath as Spain and Greece.Sadly even with all of these monetary stimulus programs, the United
States economy is barely treading water. It was recently reported that the U.S. economy shrunk 0.1 percent in Q4 of 2012 according to official numbers from the U.S. Commerce Department.
Considering economic statistics from the government are questionable at
best, it is quite possible that the real numbers are far worse. If the
U.S. economy is actually shrinking with these types of monetary policies
in place, it is painfully obvious that the Federal Reserve has no exit
strategy from the status quo. Any attempt to defend the value of the
U.S. Dollar by suspending debt purchases and raising interest rates
would send the economy into a tailspin. Ben Bernanke the Federal Reserve
Chairman once famously said that he would throw money out of a helicopter to keep the economy going
so we should fully expect him to continue these activities. In fact, we
already know through the Federal Reserve’s own policy statements that
they will be continuing near zero interest rate policies well into the future.
At this point that’s really all they can do since it is politically
infeasible for them to tighten the purse strings so they just continue
to print more and more money out of nothing.The Federal Reserve’s bond purchasing programs have effectively
fueled a rally in bonds pushing yields of various U.S. government debt
instruments towards historical lows. This has fooled people into
believing that U.S. government debt is a safe haven play which is
astounding on so many levels. The rate of return on these debt
instruments is actually negative when factoring in the real rate of
inflation. The government and establishment media love to tout the
Consumer Price Index or CPI as the ultimate gauge of inflation. However,
the CPI doesn’t even include food and energy
in its calculation thus making it a completely worthless indicator of
true inflation. Maybe if people didn’t eat, didn’t use oil to heat their
homes and didn’t fill their automobiles with gasoline the CPI might
have some relevance.In reality, there’s little question that that the CPI is a purposely
manipulated figure designed to mislead people into believing that
inflation is lower than it actually is. The CPI also provides the basis
for cost of living adjustments that directly affects how much money
Social Security recipients receive. This allows the government to get
away with paying far less than if real inflation was used as the
benchmark to calculate these adjustments. The true measure of inflation
calculated using the same statistical models used by the U.S. government
during the 1970s has inflation closer to 10% on an annual basis.
Even if we were to assume that inflation is half of that figure, U.S.
Treasury bond holders would still be getting a negative rate of return
on their investment.Cleary, this is a dangerous game that is being played by the world's
central banks. Looking specifically at the Fed they announced late last
year that they would be purchasing
$85 billion worth of securities on a monthly basis for an indefinite
period of time until unemployment is substantially reduced. This
adds up to roughly $1 trillion worth of bond purchases per year which is
approximately what the federal government’s annual budget deficit has
been under the Obama regime. The Fed is essentially monetizing enough
debt for the federal government to finance its $1 trillion annual budget
deficit. In other words they are creating close to $1 trillion new
dollars out of nothing and dumping it into the system. The end result is
that you have a larger supply of dollars chasing the same goods and
services which ultimately means there will be higher prices because each
dollar will be worth less.This policy is essentially an invisible tax on the average person
because it robs them of their purchasing power. Combine this with the
fact that the Obama regime actually raised taxes on poor and middle class Americans as part of the recent fiscal cliff deal
and the additional burden Obama’s universal healthcare plan has placed
on businesses and it is no wonder why the economy is sputtering. Not
only is the currency being devalued but they are financially damaging
the base from which they collect taxes. Evidence of this economic
reality can be seen from
a leaked internal e-mail from a Wal-Mart Vice President who stated that
sales were a total disaster and that February 2013 sales were off to
its slowest start in the 7 years he’s been with the company. Since
average people now have less purchasing power to buy things with, it
shouldn’t be any surprise that we see reports like this.One would think sanity would prevail and the Obama regime would at
least end the costly foreign wars and make a few domestic spending cuts.
Since we live in a world where insanity seems to be the prevailing
thought process, we are not going to see this happen. At the recent
State of the Union speech Obama actually proposed more spending programs
including a ridiculous multi-billion dollar universal preschool initiative.
With a debt over $16 trillion, unfunded liabilities that some have
argued approach $100 trillion or higher and $1 trillion annual budget
deficits where do they think they’ll get the money to pay for these new
programs? Either this is pure stupidity of the most epic magnitude or
they are intentionally trying to destroy what’s left of the economy.
Regardless of what you believe, these policies are leading us towards
disaster.As a result of these crazy policies, huge bubbles are being created
in the U.S. Treasury bond market, the U.S. stock market and most
importantly in the U.S. Dollar itself. Since the Fed is buying an
increasing amount of bonds it has artificially propped up the market
causing investors to venture into the stock market for greater returns
on investment which has resulted in the Dow Jones Industrial Average
hitting the 14,000 level. Contrary to what the talking head clowns on
CNBC say, this is not the sign of a healthy economy but instead an
indicator of gross manipulations by the Fed which has forced investors
to take on more risk to achieve any real rate of return. At some point
the market is going to reject these policies when fewer and fewer market
participants are willing to purchase U.S. Treasury bonds at
historically low yields while the U.S. Dollar is simultaneously
devalued. This alone will cause the bond bubble to burst, yields to
skyrocket and force the U.S. government to pay even more money to
service the interest on the debt. Considering that the U.S. government
is already having a difficult time making payments to service the debt
with historically low yields, any reversal would be extremely
problematic.It is comical that there are still ratings agencies that rate U.S.
sovereign debt with a Triple-A status considering the train wreck we are
witnessing. S&P which was the one ratings agency that actually
downgraded U.S. sovereign debt is now being sued by the U.S. government over inaccurate securities ratings leading up to the 2008 financial crisis.
This is not an attempt to defend S&P by any means, but there are a
number of questions as to why they are the only ratings agency being
sued. All of the big ratings agencies were guilty of grossly
exaggerating the quality of different types of securities in the years
leading up to the 2008 financial crash. The only thing that
differentiates S&P from the other ratings agencies is that they had
the nerve to downgrade U.S. sovereign debt. This lawsuit appears to be
retaliation against them for that downgrade and nothing else. If this
isn’t the case, than why haven’t lawsuits been filed against all of the
major ratings agencies? Clearly, each one of them was involved in some
sort of chicanery leading up to the crash. With this said, there is no
reason to trust what any of these major ratings firms are saying about
U.S. sovereign debt. It is highly probable that their ratings of U.S.
sovereign debt are being affected by the possibility that the U.S.
government would threaten legal action against them if they fail to
provide a favorable analysis.It is also becoming more apparent that the central planners have been
suppressing the gold and silver price as part of an effort to maintain
the illusion that these debt based currencies still have value. The German Bundesbank recently announced its intention to take delivery of over half of its gold reserves by 2020 from the Fed and other central banks. The main question here is why would it take 7 years to complete this process? China has been buying huge sums of physical gold on the open market
and so far have had no logistical problems receiving prompt delivery of
their gold. This gives additional credence to the accusations that
central banks have been leasing out physical gold as part of a scam to
suppress the price. In other words, the gold that Germany is requesting
delivery of is no longer available which is why the gold cannot be
immediately delivered. In all likelihood, this is why an agreement was
struck to deliver the gold over 7 years so the central banks could save
face without having to transparently expose the gold manipulation fraud
they are engaged in.Either way, it is quite obvious that the gold and silver markets have
both been manipulated for some time now. If you study the daily charts
of gold and silver there are often huge price disruptions to the down
side that have no fundamental explanation. If other countries follow
suit and request physical delivery of their gold, this could put an end
to these suppression schemes resulting in a massive upswing in the price
of gold.It is often said that gold goes where wealth is being generated. If
we use that as a measuring stick it is clear that wealth is being
transferred from the west over to Asia. Specifically of interest is the
fact that gold is being purchased in large sums by both the Chinese and
Russian governments. There is even speculation that the Chinese are preparing to officially back the Yuan with gold. We also see huge gold demand from India whose gold imports surged 23% this past January. In fact gold demand has been so strong that India just raised taxes on gold imports to try to reduce demand.
Unfortunately for the west, these countries that are net buyers of gold
are going to be in a very good financial position once the full effect
of these debt monetization and low interest policies are felt. Gold is
real money and stores value unlike the debt based garbage that these
central banks are creating by typing digits into a computer.There is very little question that the global financial system is at a
point where it cannot be repaired. The policies of unlimited money
creation that are currently being implemented by the Fed and other
central banks are unfortunately going to continue until the entire
system collapses. It is now inevitable that there will be a huge crash
in the U.S. stock market, the U.S. bond market and eventually the U.S.
Dollar. Gold, silver and other precious metals should perform very well
as this scenario unfolds so there are safe havens available for people
wishing to preserve their wealth. It is unfortunate that the only
question remaining now is not if this collapse is going to happen but
when this collapse is going to happen.

A Trail of Breadcrumbs: The Resignation of Pope Benedict and the Great Financial Collapse

On Tuesday, February 12th, Pope Benedict XVI shocked the
world and his congregation with news that he was resigning the papacy;
this is entirely unprecedented in the modern age. The last pope to
resign, Gregory XII, did so only to solve a dilemma of leadership in the
church. That was 600 years ago, and it hasn’t happened since. Every
pope in 600 years has died in the arms of the church.

But not this pope. Regardless of what you
believe, it is hard to fathom how, within the Catholic framework, he can
justify rejecting the papacy theologically or practically. Despite the
advantages of medical care and luxury, despite the prospect of remaining
servant of God and meeting his creator as pope, he is rejecting his
position in relation to God and walking away.

When something extraordinary happens, one must
look for extraordinary circumstances. I think I can explain this sudden
resignation, if the reader is prepared to follow a trail of breadcrumbs,
link after link in a chain that connects five men. This is not a chain
of five conspirators, necessarily, but is intended to show the links
between our politics, our financial gurus, and our religious leaders.

First, Barack Obama. The president is bent on running the
national debt to its limit. He is pushing to eliminate the debt ceiling,
and calling for chump-change revenue while the government wastes
trillions pouring cash down sinkhole after sinkhole of boondoggles,
swindles and schemes. Every move he makes promises a parabolic curve of
rising debt. Why? There are three opinions. Firstly, it is possible that
he believes increased spending is the way to save the economy; perhaps
his advisors have told him that the depressionary forces of the market
must be countered by an inflationary monetary policy or else the economy
will collapse. The second possibility is that he knows a collapse is
inevitable and is buying time, either for noble motives (sparing
Americans the pain in the hope that some last minute save appears) or
venal (a shopping spree of spending while the reserve status makes it
possible, to secure his constituency and reward his cronies). The third
opinion is more sinister. Could Obama be running up the debt to cause
the collapse? Who would stand to benefit? And what would happen
afterwards? It is difficult to believe that this is the case. How would
the man look in the mirror?

The second link is Paul Volcker. Volcker is former chairman of
the Federal Reserve. He knows the dangers of monetary inflation, having
fought back the post-Nixon Shock inflationary wave of the 70s. He was
Obama’s advisor on the financial crisis until January, 21st2011.
On that date, he resigned his position, ceding it to G.E. CEO Jeffrey
Immelt. What had he been working on in his last months? In September
2010, a self-appointed group convened at the grand Palais-Royal in Paris
for what became known as the Palais-Royal Initiative. These men were
former central bankers from around the world, acting (we are told) on
their own. The group was assembled by Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa, an Italian
banker considered to be the“Father of the Euro”. (He is also adored by
George Soros, who named his own Euro-solution the “Padoa-Schioppa plan”)
The purpose of the Palais-Royal initiative? To create a framework for
the next phase of monetary policy.

On December 18th, just before the penultimate meeting of the
group, Padoa-Schioppa died, and the third man in our trail of
breadcrumbs appears. The new leader of the Palais-Royal group: Michel Camdessus,
French economist and former Managing Director of the IMF. The group
came to its conclusion. The report of the Palais-Royal Initiative,
issued in January of 2011 (and revised the next month) calls for the
creation of a supranational banking power, outside the control of any
government, which would issue the global reserve currency in the form of
SDRs, a unit of account created at Bretton Woods in 1944. Essentially,
Camdessus’ old colleagues at the IMF (and the Bank of International
Settlements) want to take over international finance. We can't blame
them for trying, right? Camdessus presented the document to French
President Sarkozy, and the report was disseminated on October 5th, 2011 among the papers of the G-20, appearing on the abstract as a paper written specifically for the G-20.

One may well imagine the response to this paper: "This new banking
takeover might work, Monsieur Camdessus, but is it right? Is it moral?"
And now the Vatican comes in. We come to our fourth name, that of Cardinal Peter Turkson. Turkson is president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. On October 23rd,
2011 (18 days after the G-20 presentation) the Pontifical Council for
Justice and Peace surprised many by coming out with a proposal that
damned “the idolatry of the market” and called for a supranational
banking authority identical to the one recommended by the Palais-Royal
group. What are the chances? Coincidence? Not when you look on the list
of advisors to the Council. There among the names is Michel Camdessus.

And so we come to the last name on our list, full circle to Pope Benedict XVI.
Why is he stepping down so unexpectedly? The answer is to be found, I
believe, in the name of the man considered to have the best odds of
being our next pope: Cardinal Peter Turkson. According to the
Pope’s own brother, Benedict is tormented by the “Vatileaks” scandal,
involving leaked Vatican documents indicating money laundering and
corruption. This is not to say that Benedict himself is implicated, but
he may well be resigning to protect the church, as acquiescence to
someone’s threat to release more. Who would possess such documents? The
financiers who are on the opposite side of the Vatican trades,
naturally. Those financiers who want a new pope in power:Peter Turkson,
who is fully on board, and who will declare the IMF schemes to be moral
and just when the time comes, a man who is unassailable due to his skin
color, who will be commanding the obedience of 1.2 billion Catholics.

If there is any truth to these speculations, whether you believe in a
divinity or you don’t, I think you can appreciate and share the
sentiment: God help us all.

ABOUT THIS BLOG

I AM A FEROCIOUS CONSERVATIVE
CONSERVATIVE RIGHT WINGER UNDERGROUND... IN EXILE IN AMERICA !
I AM AN UNRELENTING FEROCIOUS CONSERVATIVE:
Ferocious = (fə-rō'shəs) “Marked by unrelenting intensity; to the extreme”
Conservative = (kən-sûr'və-tĭz'əm) “A political philosophy or attitude emphasizing respect for traditional institutions and distrust of government activism”
My page is a place for Unrelenting Ferocious Activist Conservatives across our country to gather and discuss and plan our next moves. I am tired of sitting around and playing “nice” while the Progressive Liberals have spent the last 50 years attacking and denigrating our values and our beliefs while our side sits around and tries real hard to be accommodating and “Nice”! (Political Correctness!) NO MORE!!
AS AN UNRELENTING FEROCIOUS CONSERVATIVES. I WILL ATTACK BACK!