National Governors' Group Raises Education Profile

For the first time, the National Governors Association has
established a standing committee on education. The move signals how
prominent education has become politically for the nation's governors,
and may strengthen the bipartisan group's ability to reach consensus on
school-related policy and help its lobbying efforts on Capitol
Hill.

Gov. Dirk Kempthorne of Idaho, the Republican who became the
chairman of the Washington-based NGA two months ago, announced the
formation of the education committee at the group's annual meeting,
held in Indianapolis in August. Recently, he appointed the committee's
first leaders.

Virginia Gov. Mark Warner, a Democrat nearing the end of his second
year in office, is the chairman. Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, a Republican
re-elected in 2002, is the vice chairman. The committee will work on
K-12 education policy, early-childhood education, and workforce
issues.

The names of the members of the committee were released last
week.

Previously, the human-resources committee—one of three
standing NGA committees before the new expansion—handled an array
of subjects, including education and health care. Now, health care also
has its own committee.

"One of our top priorities is, and must be, the education of our
citizens from the youngsters to the adults. The fact that the National
Governors Association had three standing committees, none of which is
education, didn't reflect that priority," Gov. Kempthorne said in a
recent interview.

The new panel will help focus the NGA's positions on federal
education issues, possibly giving the group a clearer voice in debates
in Washington. With Congress taking up the reauthorizations of Head
Start and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, as well as
other education-related matters that have a direct effect on states,
the governors want to have a strong say in how those policies are
shaped.

Governors also differ greatly in their reactions to the federal No
Child Left Behind Act, which is sure to be another issue that the new
committee will have on its plate.

"If we don't have a bipartisan policy on an issue, we can't take a
position," said Christine LaPaille, the NGA's communications
director.

A United Front?

The education committee also will give governors the chance to delve
more deeply into education policy issues at their regular national
meetings, and to hold special meetings on the subject when
necessary.

While NGA officials downplay any political struggle within the
group's ranks, the diverse political views among its members may be
hindering the group from having distinct views on education issues that
can be made clear to members of Congress.

Gov. Warner said in an interview that NGA positions have not always
been "sharply focused," and that the NGA hasn't always had the active
participation of all governors in recent years. The new committee could
help change that trend, especially on K-12 education and related
topics, he said.

"Dirk Kempthorne is going to be a great chair of NGA. He is spending
an awful lot of personal time in getting governors more personally
invested," Gov. Warner said.

Mr. Kempthorne said he was working to get more governors involved in
the group. "It does make for a stronger organization," he said.

Some education groups in Washington would like to see the NGA become
a stronger lobby on Capitol Hill and in discussions with federal
officials on issues such as the implementation of the No Child Left
Behind Act.

"I know their power, and I'd love to have them at the table," said
Patricia F. Sullivan, a deputy executive director of the Council of
Chief State School Officers and a former NGA official.

Others speculate that political differences between the governors
have played a major role in explaining why some of them are less
active.

"I think this is an attempt on the part of NGA to head off a split
and reconcile the conservatives with NGA," said Jack Jennings, the
executive director of the nonpartisan Center on Education Policy, in
Washington, and a former longtime aide to Democrats on the House
education committee.

Mr. Jennings added that governors in general have been working to
bolster their presence on federal education policy debates in the past
decade. "Elected officials, whether they are governors or mayors or
even county executives, are feeling the pressure from the public to
make the schools better, and elected officials are taking more
responsibility for what's happening in the schools as a result," Mr.
Jennings said.

Greater visibility for education as a political issue also has
required governors to become more knowledgeable about the details of
education policy, Gov. Kempthorne added. "Part of the purpose of this
committee," he said, "will be to allow us to exchange views on the best
practices taking place."

Playing Ball

The leaders of the new committee are among the most active governors
on education policy, and they are expected to take the lead in shaping
policy ideas and making state issues better known in Washington.

In Virginia, Gov. Warner has been busy rolling out a set of
education proposals on everything from strengthening the senior year of
high school to more detailed state audits of school districts. He also
backs a plan to significantly raise school spending in the state.

Re-elected last year, Gov. Bush has implemented one of the most
ambitious and controversial sets of education policies in the country.
His school accountability program requires the state to issue a letter
grade for each public school based on standardized test scores.

Florida also has instituted voucher programs for students in schools
labeled as failing, for special education students, and for students
from low-income families. About 28,000 Florida students now use state
money to attend schools of their choice, often religious schools. The
state is also moving toward a central governance system for schools,
from preschool through graduate-level university programs.

Even governors like Mr. Bush and Mr. Warner, from different
political parties and with differing views on education and other
matters, can learn from each other, Gov. Warner said. Closed-door chats
or phone calls often help governors as they shape public policy, he
said.

"There are a lot of areas where we can work together. We all want
our schools to do well, we want our schools to be accountable, and
we're all dealing with tight fiscal times," Mr. Warner said.

Mr. Kempthorne agreed that the state executives will do better when
they hone policy ideas together. "There's less partisanship as
governors, just as [chief executive officers], are trying to help one
another serve the citizenry," the Idaho Republican said.

The other Democrats on the committee are Govs. Michael F. Easley of
North Carolina, Bob Holden of Missouri, Janet Napolitano of Arizona,
Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas, and Tom Vilsack of Iowa. Gov. Gray Davis
of California also is on the committee, but is expected to step down in
the wake of his Oct. 7 recall defeat. ("Educators Watchful as California
Opens Schwarzenegger Era," Oct. 15, 2003.)

The Republicans are Govs. Jim Douglas of Vermont, Mike Huckabee of
Arkansas, Linda Lingle of Hawaii, Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota, Sonny
Perdue of Georgia, John G. Rowland of Connecticut, and Felix Camacho of
Guam.

Vol. 23, Issue 8, Pages 21, 24

Published in Print: October 22, 2003, as National Governors' Group Raises Education Profile

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.