Pages

Thursday, January 08, 2015

How PBMs Profit From the Hepatitis C Formulary Wars...And What It Means for Specialty's Future

A new formulary exclusion battle is happening in specialty drugs…and PBMs will be profiting.

Just before Christmas, Express Scripts made AbbVie’s new Viekira Pak the exclusive option for genotype 1 hepatitis C patients covered by its national preferred formulary. This week, CVS/Caremark made Sovaldi and Harvoni (both from Gilead Sciences) the exclusive options for patients with hepatitis C.

I estimate that these formulary moves, combined with specialty pharmacy dispensing, will allow the PBMs to earn as much as $2,600 to $3,100 per patient. Pretty, pretty, pretty good.

Within three years, the generic wave ends, and specialty drugs will become payers’ primary focus. Expect more formulary battles as specialty classes get crowded with multiple therapeutic alternatives. WHAT HAPPENED

In case you missed the news, here are two Wall Street Journal articles on the formulary deals:

“We will identify which drugs can be pitted against each other and make some really tough formulary decisions. If the difference in convenience cannot be demonstrated to have a difference in outcomes, we often recommend coverage of the equally effective, less-convenient product.”

“Gilead could have a great year this year and lose all its market share a year from now…The companies that will be second and third to the market here will have to play catch up. We could shift the market share as soon as a competitor comes out. We need to start a national debate on fairness in drug pricing.”

When AbbVie’s Viekira Pak launched last month, Express Scripts followed through on its threats. The PBM excluded the Gilead products from its national preferred formulary, which covers about 25 million members of its total 85 million covered lives. AbbVie’s discount to Express Scripts has not been publicly disclosed.

Gilead responded quickly with its own deal. The CVS/Caremark agreement is broader, because it includes the standard commercial, Medicare Part D, and Managed Medicaid formularies.

I expect we’ll soon hear from Catamaran, OptumRx, Prime, et al.

HOW MUCH?

I estimate that Express Scripts and CVS will earn about $2,600 to $3,100 per patient. Here’s how:

Express Scripts disclosed that AbbVie’s product will be dispensed exclusively by its Accredo specialty pharmacy. Other specialty pharmacies will be dispensing the product to patients with a different PBM or payer. CVS Health hasn’t publicly disclosed anything about dispensing, although its CVS Caremark Specialty Pharmacy will presumably garner most of the volume.

The PBMs are notoriously secretive about their pharmacy operations and margins. We know however that specialty pharmacy Diplomat Pharmacy had net income from operations of 1.0% in 2014’s third quarter. Given the products’ WAC prices and typical pharmacy reimbursement rates, the PBMs’ specialty pharmacy will earn about $825 to $925 per patient, for a typical course of therapy.

2. Share of Rebates—AbbVie and Gilead have negotiated discounts with the PBMs. These discounts are paid as formulary rebates, which reduce the payer’s net cost per prescription. I estimate that PBMs pass back more than 90% of rebates received from brand-name pharmaceutical manufacturers. (Some payers negotiate to receive 100% of rebates.) For the hepatitis C drugs, Deutsche Bank’s George Hill estimates that PBMs will retain about $1,800 to $2,200 of rebates per patient.

These are rough estimates. We don’t know the actual rebates, what percentage of those rebates will be retained by the PBMs, the PBMs’ pharmacy operating margins, etc. Keep in mind that Hepatitis C products will only account for a very small share of 2015’s prescriptions.

The recent Hepatitis C exclusions however are the most significant exclusions for a specialty therapeutic class. Typically, drugs that are targeted for formulary exclusion usually fall into one or more of these categories: (1) Non-preferred, tier 3 drugs with very low utilization, (2) heavily promoted drugs in therapeutic classes with multiple generic alternatives, and/or (3) brand-name products with generic equivalents.

Compared with Caremark, Express Scripts has been more aggressive about specialty drug exclusions from its national formularies. For instance, Express Scripts excluded Amgen’s Aranesp and Epogen from its 2015 formulary. See The 2015 PBM Formulary Exclusion Lists are Here!

Anthem got a better deal than their great "partner" Express Scripts could?Or is Express Scripts just oinking the rebates...and Anthem knows?Or would Anthem rather not pay for the many Harvoni/Sovaldi PA approvals bound to happen anyways?Or would Anthem would rather not pay Abbvie $83,319 when $64,000 of Harvoni could do the job (8 week cure)? (and with 448 FEWER tablets!)Express Script's "price war" charade looks more like a big rebate pig-out. Interesting future... PBMs get shut out of the biggest specialty deals & get stuck with the boring stuff. How humiliating.

DISCLAIMERThe analyses on this website are based on information and data that are in the public domain. Any conclusions, findings, opinions, or recommendations are based on our own experienced and professional judgment and interpretations given the information available. While all information is believed to be reliable at the time of writing, the information provided here is for reference use only and does not constitute the rendering of legal, financial, commercial, or other professional advice by Pembroke Consulting, Inc. or the author. Any reliance upon the information is at your own risk, and Pembroke Consulting, Inc. and the author shall not be responsible for any liability arising from or related to the use or accuracy of the information in any way. Pembroke Consulting, Inc. does not make investment recommendations, on this website or otherwise. Nothing on this website should be interpreted as an opinion by Pembroke Consulting, Inc. or the author on the investment prospects of specific companies.

The comments contained on this site come from members of the public and do not necessarily reflect the views of Pembroke Consulting or the author. Neither Pembroke Consulting nor the author endorse or approve of their content. Pembroke Consulting and the author reserve the right to remove or block comments, but are under no obligation to explain individual moderation decisions.

The public domain use of our materials includes linking to our website. You do not need to obtain special permission to link to the Drug Channels site.

The content of Sponsored Posts does not necessarily reflect the views of Pembroke Consulting, Inc., or any of its employees.