Hello America,
My name is Tony Whitcomb and I am the Founder and CEO of Expotera.
I have created Expotera, as well as this Blog, to let the good, honest and hardworking Citizens of this Country know that the Revolution has now begun.
Power To The People!!

Thursday, October 27, 2016

When FBI Director James Comey announced on July 5 that
the Department of Justice would not seek the indictment
of Hillary Clinton for failure to safeguard state secrets
related to her email use while she was secretary of state,
he both jumped the gun and set in motion a series of events
that surely he did not intend.

Was his hand forced by the behavior of FBI agents who
wouldn’t take no for an answer?

Did he let the FBI become a political tool?

Here is the back story.

The FBI began investigating the Clinton email scandal in the spring
of 2015, when The New York Times revealed Clinton’s use of a
private email address for her official governmental work and the
fact that she did not preserve the emails on State Department
servers, contrary to federal law.

After an initial collection of evidence and a round of interviews,
agents and senior managers gathered in the summer of 2015 to discuss how to
proceed.

It was obvious to all that a prima-facie case could be made
for espionage, theft of government property and obstruction
of justice charges.

The consensus was to proceed with a formal criminal investigation.

Six months later, the senior FBI agent in charge of that
investigation resigned from the case and retired from the
FBI because he felt the case was going "sideways"; that’s
law enforcement jargon for "nowhere by design."

John Giacalone had been the chief of the New York City,
Philadelphia and Washington, D.C., field offices of the FBI
and, at the time of his "sideways" comment, was the chief
of the FBI National Security Branch.

The reason for the "sideways" comment must have been Giacalone’s
realization that DOJ and FBI senior management had decided that
the investigation would not work in tandem with a federal grand
jury.

That is nearly fatal to any government criminal case.

In criminal cases, the FBI and the DOJ cannot issue subpoenas
for testimony or for tangible things; only grand juries can.

Giacalone knew that without a grand jury, the FBI
would be toothless, as it would have no subpoena
power.

He also knew that without a grand jury, the FBI would have
a hard time persuading any federal judge to issue search
warrants.

A judge would perceive the need for search warrants to be not
acute in such a case because to a judge, the absence of a grand
jury can only mean a case is "sideways" and not a serious
investigation.

As the investigation dragged on in secret and Donald Trump
simultaneously began to rise in the Republican presidential
primaries, it became more apparent to Giacalone’s successors
that the goal of the FBI was to exonerate Clinton, not determine
whether there was enough evidence to indict her.

In late spring of this year, agents began interviewing the
Clinton inner circle.

When Clinton herself was interviewed on July 2 – for only four
hours, during which the interviewers seemed to some in the bureau
to lack aggression, passion and determination – some FBI agents
privately came to the same conclusion as their former boss:

The case was going sideways.

A few determined agents were frustrated by Clinton’s professed
lack of memory during her interview and her oblique reference to
a recent head injury she had suffered as the probable cause of that.

They sought to obtain her medical records to verify the gravity
of her injury and to determine whether she had been truthful
with them.

They prepared the paperwork to obtain the records, only to
have their request denied by Director Comey himself on
July 4.

Then some agents did the unthinkable; they reached out to
colleagues in the intelligence community and asked them to
obtain Clinton’s medical records so they could show them to
Comey.

We know that the National Security Agency can access anything
that is stored digitally, including medical records.

These communications took place late on July 4.

When Comey learned of these efforts, he headed them off the
next morning with his now infamous news conference, in which he
announced that Clinton would not be indicted because the FBI had
determined that her behavior, though extremely careless, was not
reckless, which is the legal standard in espionage cases.

He then proceeded to recount the evidence against her.

He did this, no doubt, to head off the agents who had sought the
Clinton medical records, whom he suspected would leak evidence
against her.

Three months later – and just weeks before Clinton will probably be
elected president – we have learned that President Barack Obama
regularly communicated with Clinton via her personal email servers
about matters that the White House considered classified.

That means that he lied when he told CBS News that he learned
of the Clinton servers when the rest of us did.

We also learned this week that Andrew McCabe, Giacalone’s
successor as head of the FBI Washington field office and presently
the No. 3 person in the FBI, is married to a woman to whom the
Clinton money machine in Virginia funneled about $675,000 in
lawful campaign funds for a failed 2015 run for the Virginia Senate.

Comey apparently saw no conflict or appearance of impropriety in
having the person in charge of the Clinton investigation in such an
ethically challenged space.

Why did this case go sideways?

Did President Obama fear being a defense witness
at Hillary Clinton’s criminal trial?

Did he so fear being succeeded in office by Donald Trump that he
ordered the FBI to exonerate Clinton, the rule of law be damned?

Did the FBI lose its reputation for fidelity to law,
bravery under stress and integrity at all times?

Thursday, October 20, 2016

It wasn’t rigged by the Republicans, the Democrats, Russians,
space aliens, or voters.

It was rigged by the owners of television networks who believed
that giving one candidate far more coverage than others was
good for their ratings.

The CEO of CBS Leslie Moonves said of this decision: “It may
not be good for America, but it’s damn good for CBS.”

Justifying that choice based on polling gets the chronology
backwards, ignores Moonves’ actual motivation, and avoids the
problem, which is that there ought to be fair coverage for all
qualified candidates (and a democratic way to determine who
is qualified).

It was rigged by the Democratic National Committee and its co-
conspirators in the media, many of whom have helpfully confessed
(in case it wasn’t obvious) in emails leaked from the DNC and from
John Podesta.

The DNC chose Hillary Clinton and worked hard to make sure
that she “won.”

Nobody has produced a hint of evidence as to who leaked the
emails that added unnecessary confirmation of this rigging,
but they should be thanked for informing us, whoever they are.

The FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton’s misuse of email was
as rigged as the non-prosecution of the CEO of Wells Fargo.

The U.S. political system is bought and paid for.

Without millions of dollars to funnel to television networks for
advertising, any candidate is rigged right out of participating.

This rigging of the system is not fixed by someone like Donald
Trump pretending for a while that he won’t take bribes, that
he’ll spend only his own money, because most people don’t
have that kind of money to spend.

This rigging is not fixed by making someone like Hillary Clinton
take her bribes through her family foundation or requiring that her
political action committees remain theoretically separate from the
campaign they are collaborating hand-in-glove with, because money
buys power.

The debates are rigged by a private entity with no official status
that calls itself the Commission on Presidential Debates and
transforms open debates among multiple candidates into
exclusively bipartisan joint appearances with many large and
fine points negotiated beforehand.

Actual governance of the United States is rigged.

Congress plans to attempt to ram through a number of intensely
unpopular measures just after the election, including a
supplemental spending bill for more wars and including the
Trans-Pacific Partnership.

The hope is that most people will have tuned out after the
election circus, and that most of them will forget what
happened 2 or 4 years later.

The demonization of Vladimir Putin is rigged.

Nobody has seen evidence that he or his government did us
the favor of informing us of the DNC’s corruption.

He proposed a ban on cyber “war” that was rejected by the
United States, for goodness sake.

There’s no evidence that Russia shot down an airplane in Ukraine or
invaded Ukraine or seized Crimea or plotted attacks on the United
States.

The United States pulled out of the ABM treaty, expanded NATO to
Russia’s border, built missile bases, arranged military “exercises,”
facilitated a Ukrainian coup, and pushed a string of hostile lies.

Russia has shown even more restraint than your typical U.S. voter
(who usually sits home and does not vote, especially in primaries).

Military spending is rigged.

Nobody knows it amounts to over half of U.S. discretionary
spending.

Nobody knows it’s as much in the U.S. as in the rest of the world
(allies and otherwise) combined.

Nobody pays attention to the bribes from war profiteers, or to the
threats held over Congress members to pull weapons jobs out of
districts or states.

Supporters of both big candidates claim their candidate plans to
cut military spending.

Both candidates have said the exact opposite.

The debates and interviews steer clear of the whole topic.

The shapes of the districts are blatantly rigged by gerrymandering.

The existence of the Senate, in which Rhode Island and Wyoming
each have as much say as California is rigged against the popular
will.

The electoral college is rigged against the popular will and in favor
of concentrating national campaigns in a handful of “swing states.”

Voter registration is rigged.

A handful of states have now made it automatic, as most states
have long-since done for military draft registration.

In the rest of the country, thousands of young people run around
registering voters, imagining they are engaged in “activism.”

Meanwhile, the right to vote can be denied to anyone by claiming
they aren’t registered.

People’s names are stripped from voting rolls through a so-called
justice system that brands them as felons, and through the careful
rigging of those rolls by corrupt and partisan state governments
that intentionally strip out people likely to vote for a particular
party.

Intimidation and racial profiling by partisan activists serve
the same function of rigging the election.

The myths and lies about the virtually nonexistent phenomenon
of “voter fraud” also serve to rig the election.

The election machines are also rigged.

That is to say: instead of verifiable paper ballots publicly hand-
counted in front of observers from all interested parties in each
polling place, we have a faith-based system of voting on black-box
machines that can never, even in theory, be checked for accuracy.

These machines have been very easily hacked in demonstrations.

These machines have visibly flipped votes before the eyes (and
cameras) of countless voters.

These machines have almost certainly played a key role in flipping
the results of numerous elections.

Now, the wider the margin of victory, the less likely an electronic
flipping. And the fact that machines can easily be used to steal an
election does not mean that they always will be.

But it was very odd during the late summer of 2016 to watch the
U.S. media announce that these machines were totally unreliable
just what many of us had been saying for years.

But the media said this in order to accuse Russia of planning to
sabotage the coming U.S. election, or in order to accuse Russia
of exactly what these media reports themselves did: plant seeds
of doubt in U.S. minds.

Those doubts should be there. People should watch for visible
problems with machines and with partisan and racist intimidators,
and report all such to 1-866-OUR-VOTE, to county clerks, to
secretaries of state, and to corporate and independent media.

Then we should work for necessary reforms, including a respectful
cessation of the U.S. government’s routine practice of interfering in
elections and overthrowing governments in other people’s countries
— a practice that has clearly resulted in the U.S. media projecting
such behavior on others.

Ultimately, an unrigging of the U.S. system might take the form
of amending the U.S. Constitution to slip in words like these:

The rights protected by the Constitution of the United States are
the rights of natural persons only.

Artificial entities, such as corporations, limited liability companies,
and other entities, established by the laws of any State, the United
States, or any foreign state shall have no rights under this
Constitution and are subject to regulation by the People, through
Federal, State, or local law. The privileges of artificial entities shall
be determined by the People, through Federal, State, or local law.

The judiciary shall not construe the spending of money to influence
elections to be speech under the First Amendment.

All elections for President and members of the United States House
of Representatives and the United States Senate shall be entirely
publicly financed.

No political contributions shall be permitted to any federal
candidate, from any other source, including the candidate.

No political expenditures shall be permitted in support of any
federal candidate, or in opposition to any federal candidate,
from any other source, including the candidate.

The Congress shall, by statute, provide limitations on the amounts
and timing of the expenditures of such public funds and provide
criminal penalties for any violation of this section.

State and local governments shall regulate, limit, or prohibit
contributions and expenditures, including a candidate’s own
contributions and expenditures, for the purpose of influencing in
any way the election of any candidate for state or local public
office or any state or local ballot measure.

The right of the individual U.S. citizen to vote and to directly elect
all candidates by popular vote in all pertinent local, state, and
federal elections shall not be violated.

Citizens will be automatically registered to vote upon reaching the
age of 18 or upon becoming citizens at an age above 18, and the
right to vote shall not be taken away from them. Votes shall be
recorded on paper ballots, which shall be publicly counted at the
polling place.

Election Day shall be a National Holiday.

Nothing contained in this amendment shall be construed
to abridge the freedom of the press.

During a designated campaign period of no longer than six months,
free air time shall be provided in equal measure to all candidates
for federal office on national, state, or district television and radio
stations, provided that each candidate has, during the previous
year, received the supporting signatures of at least five percent of
their potential voting-age constituents.

The same supporting signatures shall also place the candidate’s
name on the ballot and require their invitation to participate in
any public debate among the candidates for the same office.

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

My name is Tony Whitcomb and I am a 50 year old American Citizen
and on behalf of myself, as well as on behalf of the, "American
People" at-large, I would like to sincerely apologize for the total,
the complete, as well as the epic, "FAILURE" that you had to stand
next to at yesterday's news conference in the White House Rose
Garden, as this total, complete, as well as epic, "FAILURE" once
again tried to insult Republican Presidential Candidate Donald J.
Trump, by accusing Mr. Trump of, "Whining" about the potential
rigging of our Country's upcoming Presidential Election.

You see Prime Minister Renzi, and with all due respect to both you, and your Country, Sir, the reason why Mr. Trump, along with millions, and millions, and millions of his fellow American Citizen's like myself, are now, "Whining" is simply because the total, the complete, as well as the epic, "FAILURE" that you had to stand next to at yesterday's news conference in the White House Rose Garden, has now borrowed more money than all 43 previous American President's, "Combined" which has now resulted in the our Country now facing a potential, "Nuclear War" with both Russia, as well as China, along with now facing a very real potential, "Civil War" right here at home.

Yet, the total, complete, as well as epic, "FAILURE" that you had to stand next to at yesterday's news conference in the White House Rose Garden, Prime Minister Renzi, is so, "ARROGANT" as well as so, "NARCISSISTIC" that he can't even own up to the very, "TREASON" that he has now very openly committed against his own, "COUNTRY" while at the very same time telling Mr. Trump, along with all of the rest of us to in essence, "Stop Whining" about all of these many, many, "PROBLEMS" this total, complete, as well as epic, "FAILURE" has now created for our entire Country as well, Prime Minister Renzi.

So once again Prime Minister Renzi, I do sincerely apologize that your visit to our Country had to include dinner with a, "WAR/CREDIT CRIMINAL" but hopefully upon your next visit to the United States of America you will be able to stand next to, as well as have dinner with a, "MAN" who is not a, total, complete, as well as epic, "FAILURE" like the man that you had to stand next to at yesterday's news conference in the White House Rose Garden.

Friday, October 14, 2016

You and your husband have now put the United States of America
well over, "$20 Trillion Dollars" in debt, as well as on the verge
of a, "Nuclear War" with both Russia and China, as well as on the
verge of a, "Civil War" right here at Home, yet both you and your
husband are still out there giving speeches and trying to talk,
"Trash" about Republican Presidential Candidate Donald J. Trump?

Mrs. Obama, for both your information and also for the record,
you and your husband's "ACTIONS" over these past seven plus years,
speak much, much, "LOUDER" than any of Mr. Donald J. Trump's,
"WORDS" over these past seven plus years, simply because over
these past seven plus years, you, Mrs. Obama, along with your
husband, have now borrowed more money than all 43 previous,
"Presidents" combined, and there is a word for this and that word
is simply called, "TREASON" Mrs. Obama.

So it's funny how two people who have now very openly committed,
"TREASON" against the United States of America, would still be out
there giving speeches and trying to talk trash about someone who
hasn't committed, "TREASON" against the United States of America,
Republican Presidential Candidate Donald J. Trump.

Now Mrs. Obama, I know in your world, "WAR CRIMINALS" such as
both your husband, as well as yourself, simply go on to become,
"Multi-Millionaires" many, many, times over, while continuing to
enjoy 24/7 protection from any, "LEGAL" consequences for both
your individual, as well as your collective, "ACTIONS" Mrs. Obama.

But in our, "WORLD" Mrs. Obama, war/credit criminals eventually
get brought to, "JUSTICE" and on November 08, 2016, "THE PEOPLE"
will not only be casting our, "VOTES" for Republican Presidential
Candidate Donald J. Trump, but we will also be casting our votes
to bring all of the war/credit criminals to, "JUSTICE" as well, Mrs. Obama.

So inclosing Mrs. Obama, you and your husband can continue to say
whatever you want about Mr. Donald J. Trump because at the end
of the day, Mr. Donald J. Trump didn't raise our taxes, or quadruple
the price of food, or double African American unemployment, or
increase, "Welfare" to a record level for eight straight years, nor
did he leave any of our U.S. Soldiers behind in Benghazi to be,
"Slaughtered" and he did not betray our, "Veterans" or reduce their
promised benefits as well, nor did he fund, as well as arm, "ISIS"
which has now allowed them to systematically exterminate both,
"Christians" as well as, "Muslims" throughout the Middle East, and
throughout the entire rest of the, 'World" Mrs. Obama, and last but
certainly not the very least, Mr. Donald J. Trump did not increase
our Nation's debt to well over, "20 Trillion Dollars" but you and your
husband did Mrs. Obama and there is absolutely, positively, nothing
that you or your husband, can now say about, "Mr. Donald J. Trump"
that will ever, ever, ever, ever, change any of, "THIS" Mrs. Obama.

Saturday, October 8, 2016

Therefore, I now represent, "The Dead" who are now also walking with me.

You see, "The Dead" are now walking with me because, "The Dead" now want both, "Justice" as well as, "Revenge" against, "The Living" who have now, "Forsaken" each, and every, one of them.

Therefore, I now walk with and represent, "The Dead" because in the words of Ngo Dinh Diem, "Follow me if I advance! Kill me if I retreat! Revenge me if I die!"

Therefore, I now walk with and represent, "The Dead" because in the words of Meir Kahane, "No trait is more justified than revenge in the right time and place."

Therefore, I now walk with and represent, "The Dead" because in the words of Heinrich Heine, "We should forgive our enemies, but not before they are hanged."

Therefore, I now walk with and represent, "The Dead" because in the words of Saad Hariri, "Justice is revenge."

Therefore, this is now, "The Dawn of The Dead" simply because in
the words of William Shakespeare, "If you prick us do we not bleed?
If you tickle us do we not laugh? If you poison us do we not die? And
if you wrong us shall we not revenge?" Satan??

Search This Blog

About Me

My name is Tony Whitcomb. I am a Social Entrepreneur, Founder and CEO of Expotera.
I created Expotera and this Blog, to teach Corporate America and our Government, a few basic lessons in Ethics, Honesty, Macro Economics and Social Justice.
Power To The People!!