Lack of training not limited to two-legged TSA

I'd like to point out that even in regimes such as N Korea, and China, the victim is still told exactly what rules/laws they are accused of breaking. There's no "SSI." Even if the rules are absolutely foolish, they're still told.

I'd like to point out that even in regimes such as N Korea, and China, the victim is still told exactly what rules/laws they are accused of breaking. There's no "SSI." Even if the rules are absolutely foolish, they're still told.

Click to expand...

It's sad that regimes like North Korea and China are more honorable overall than any individual working for the TSA.

I'd like to point out that even in regimes such as N Korea, and China, the victim is still told exactly what rules/laws they are accused of breaking. There's no "SSI." Even if the rules are absolutely foolish, they're still told.

Click to expand...

BINGO!!! It just hit me! That's why every hokey-pokey procedure that TSA dreams up is SSI. They just don't want people knowing how f**king foolish it is... so ...they... just...don't ...tell ... anybody .................... anything, right?

That's why every hokey-pokey procedure that TSA dreams up is SSI. They just don't want people knowing how f**king foolish it is.

Click to expand...

Unlikely. It's painfully obvious just how f**cking foolish everything the TSA does is.

It's more likely they pretend to the "SSI" nomenclature so as to avoid having people seeing how f**cking foolish the TSA is in writing. "It's SSI" is a great excuse for that sort of thing. Even the TSA's apparently intelligent (but still evil) personnel who claim to hate "SSI" still love to use it as an excuse for their daily routine of assaulting their fellow citizens under color of authority.