To weigh which view is accurate, ask yourself: What kind of uproar would arise if reinstatement of the draft followed an ill-advised, illegal, and undeclared war that Pentagon officials and our allies have spoken out against? And even worse, how many mothers would stand for having their sons inducted when those declaring war stand to benefit from war? How will President Bush's ties to the Carlyle Group be received? Or Cheney's ties with military contractor, Kellogg, Brown and Root? And what about Army Secretary White's ties to Lockheed, Enron and scandal, in general?

Here is the full text of the article in case the link goes bad:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/articles/02/07/30_draft.html

Giving the Draft the Shaft
July 30, 2002
By Maureen Farrell

These days, whether referring to a regime change in Iraq or another terrorist attack on America, government spokespeople are almost certain to repeat the mantra: "It's not a matter of if, but when."

Says who?

Even as fatalism spreads through the land, some of us believe America functions best as a democracy, and that "eternal vigilance" is still "the price of liberty." We write congressmen, senators and newspaper editors, knowing that when enough of us are mobilized, we can indeed, change the world. War in Iraq? Nukes in New York? It's not a matter of if, or when, but a matter of "how do we stop it?"

The same can be said of reinstating the draft.

This March, when asked about the possibility of the nation once again relying upon conscription, President Bush stated that "the country shouldn't expect there to be a draft." Yet Lewis C. Brodsky, director of public and congressional affairs with the Selective Service System, said that, "the nation must be prepared to conduct one."

When one looks at recent trends, it seems that the country is indeed becoming prepared.

As of May 2001, seven states followed Delaware's lead by enacting laws linking driver's license applications to Selective Service registration. Essentially they're saying, "Want to drive a car? Sign up for duty." By July 2002, 25 states, 2 territories and the District of Columbia adopted similar laws.

According to the Selective Service, boys in Oklahoma, Delaware, Arkansas, Utah, Georgia, Hawaii, Alabama, Florida, Colorado, Texas, Louisiana, Illinois, Ohio, South Dakota, Mississippi, Idaho, Virginia, Wisconsin, New Hampshire, West Virginia, Tennessee, South Carolina, Maryland, Rhode Island, Missouri, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands are now required to sign up for selective service when they register for driver's licenses. New Yorkers will soon follow similar procedures, and North Carolina and Pennsylvania are halfway through the legislative process. Other states are considering following suit.

Some of our more progressive and populist leaders are against reinstating the draft, under any circumstance. On April 5, 2002, Representative Ron Paul, a Republican from Texas, issued a resolution opposing the reinstatement of the draft. Vietnam War veteran John McCain has also spoken out against conscription, while Senator Robert Byrd, one of two prescient senators who voted against the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, has warned that should the War on Terror take us to Iraq, we might face another Vietnam.

Arguments that conscription is unconstitutional are often countered with the example set forth in the preamble of the U.S. Constitution. Certainly, the words, 'We the people ... [shall] provide for the common defense'" could be construed as proof the framers had conscription in mind. Yet if one is going to invoke the Constitution to uphold the draft, one also has to remember that, according to the Constitution, only Congress can declare war - and the founders were well aware of the dangers presented by presidents acting as tyrants. Purists might also want to inquire as to whether it's Constitutional to hold citizens as "enemy combatants," or to violate International law by calling for "regime change."

In response to his state's new driver's license/selective service law, Virginia Govenor Mark Warner said, "In this time of war, we need to make sure that we have a full sign up Selective Service," while adding, "I think most boys would be proud to do it." Yet Republican pollster Frank Lutz recently discovered that a full 37% of college kids would evade the draft.

To weigh which view is accurate, ask yourself: What kind of uproar would arise if reinstatement of the draft followed an ill-advised, illegal, and undeclared war that Pentagon officials and our allies have spoken out against? And even worse, how many mothers would stand for having their sons inducted when those declaring war stand to benefit from war? How will President Bush's ties to the Carlyle Group be received? Or Cheney's ties with military contractor, Kellogg, Brown and Root? And what about Army Secretary White's ties to Lockheed, Enron and scandal, in general?

At the moment, this conscription conversation is mere speculation - just an exercise in "connecting the dots," based upon circumstantial evidence. The same can be said of concerns over Posse Comitatus or Operation TIPs, and fears that America might become a police state monitored by a red, white and blue-adorned Stasi. Could the tanks recently deployed out of Alabama for Homeland Security be used to keep dissidents in line? Could stated opposition to the War on Terror be enough to make the cable guy turn you in? Might Army civilian labor camps be used as modern-day interment camps? Who knows?

These question might stem from paranoia. And they may be silly and pointless. But they could also be an exercise in eternal vigilance. Our liberty depends upon our asking.

Um ... America is not a democracy. America is a republic. It is the duty of the people, not the government, to provide for the common defense.

Posted by: Daniel Q. McIlvaine on January 28, 2003 04:10 PM

shouldn't it be women also instead of just men. women argue for equal rights so they should also be drafted.

Posted by: brittany duke on March 24, 2003 07:06 AM

First of all, I believe that the war in Iraq is the right thing to do for the security of this nation. But I believe that the draft is immoral. The only time that it should even be considered is if we were being invaded, and we had no soldiers. And in that case, I'm sure that people would take up arms themsevles and defend their country. Our way of life would depend on it.

Posted by: Domenic Vadala on April 3, 2003 09:36 AM

Ask yourself this question: Should people be forced to die when they are not ready to die?What the draft truly means is certain combat duties and even possible death. I believe that it should not be the government's decision to send people to their deaths. It should be the individual's decision instead, which is why people can sign up for military duty. Many young men still have much to look forward to in their lives. By sending us to the battlefield, the government is taking our future away from us. Those who are killed or even maimed will never have the same life again, only a shadow of one's former self and its possibilities.

Posted by: N/A on April 30, 2004 09:43 AM

Ask yourself this question: Should people be forced to die when they are not ready to die?What the draft truly means is certain combat duties and even possible death. I believe that it should not be the government's decision to send people to their deaths. It should be the individual's decision instead, which is why people can sign up for military duty. Many young men still have much to look forward to in their lives. By sending us to the battlefield, the government is taking our future away from us. Those who are killed or even maimed will never have the same life again, only a shadow of one's former self and its possibilities.

Posted by: N/A on April 30, 2004 09:43 AM

Ask yourself this question: Should people be forced to die when they are not ready to die?What the draft truly means is certain combat duties and even possible death. I believe that it should not be the government's decision to send people to their deaths. It should be the individual's decision instead, which is why people can sign up for military duty. Many young men still have much to look forward to in their lives. By sending us to the battlefield, the government is taking our future away from us. Those who are killed or even maimed will never have the same life again, only a shadow of one's former self and its possibilities.

Posted by: College Student on April 30, 2004 09:43 AM

Post a comment

Name:

Email Address:

URL:

No free link advertizing is allowed here. If you post a commercial link in this comment you agree to pay me $500 per link pursuant to the Terms posted here. Type "AGREE" here: