Perdido 03

Monday, December 3, 2012

Common Core Excises Literature From English Classes

The Washington Post covers the controversial removal of English literature from English class as required by the Common Core Federal Standards:

As states across the country implement broad changes in curriculum
from kindergarten through high school, English teachers worry that they
will have to replace the dog-eared novels they love with historical
documents and nonfiction texts.

The Common Core State Standards in
English, which have been adopted in 46 states and the District, call
for public schools to ramp up nonfiction so that by 12th grade students
will be reading mostly “informational text” instead of fictional
literature. But as teachers excise poetry and classic works of fiction
from their classrooms, those who designed the guidelines say it appears
that educators have misunderstood them.

Proponents of the new
standards, including the National Governors Association and the Council
of Chief State School Officers, say U.S. students have suffered from a
diet of easy reading and lack the ability to digest complex nonfiction,
including studies, reports and primary documents. That has left too many
students unprepared for the rigors of college and demands of the
workplace, experts say.

The new standards, which are slowly
rolling out now and will be in place by 2014, require that nonfiction
texts represent 50 percent of reading assignments in elementary schools,
and the requirement grows to 70 percent by grade 12.

Common Core proponents, including David Coleman, the man who wrote the ELA standards, say teachers, principals and superintendents are misreading the standards:

But the chief architect of the Common Core Standards said educators
are overreacting as the standards move from concept to classroom.

“There’s a disproportionate amount of anxiety,”
said David Coleman, who led the effort to write the standards with a
grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Coleman said educators
are misinterpreting the directives.

Yes, the standards do require
increasing amounts of nonfiction from kindergarten through grade 12,
Coleman said. But that refers to reading across all subjects, not just
in English class, he said. Teachers in social studies, science and math
should require more reading, which would allow English teachers to
continue to assign literature, he said.

Social studies teachers,
for example, could have students read the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.’s
“Letter From a Birmingham Jail,” while math students could read Euclid’s
“Elements” from 300 B.C.

The standards explicitly say that
Shakespeare and classic American literature should be taught, said
Coleman, who became president of the College Board in November. “It does
really concern me that these facts are not as clear as they should be,”
he said.

What Coleman and the other Common Core reformers seem to misunderstand is that literature and reading is not going to be taught in other classes like science and math - especially not in such a high stakes environment as we have now where every class has a high stakes test at the end of it that will be used in part to evaluate the teacher of that class.

While Coleman and other Common Core proponents claim the rationale behind the standards is not to excise literature from the curriculum but rather to force schools to teach tougher, more complex texts, the real world consequence of the standards will be to cut literature and personal writing out of the curriculum and replace it with informational texts and fact-based, argumentative writing.

It is not a mistake that in a country where the ruling elite are stealing more and more of the resources that the new federal curriculum excises literature and personal writing and replaces it with informational texts and memo writing (which Coleman famously elevated above personal writing at a meeting over the Common Core standards in NY State.)

This education system, these Common Core standards, are meant to develop obedient workers and compliant consumers who will work and buy, work and buy, work and buy without the critical thinking skills or emotional understanding to question the system and how they relate to it.

So David Coleman and the other Common Core proponents can make believe that these standard are meant to raise the education level of students around the country all they want.

The truth is, these standards are meant to further separate humans from their humanity, further de-personalize education, churn out students who can handle the rudimentary work needed to keep the country going but unaware of their own socio-emotional needs.

3 comments:

With respect, you're really misreading this...while also ignoring so much of the insights and instruments that will be reshaping education in the coming years. How does your conclusion square with the increasing focus on personalized and differentiated instruction? How does your argument square with an insistence on developing critical thinking skills and multiple literacies...literacies across platforms (text, media, etc.) that are proving to be inspiring and empowering tools for youth expression? These are, of course, a bit meta in response...but still, where are they in your thinking?

As for integrating reading/writing expectations across the curriculum, I find it a bit pantywaste to bemoan the notion that our math, history, science, and sociology colleagues should expect more of their students' communication abilities.

Oh, and last I checked, informational texts and formal writing are far from empty when it comes to personal emotional understanding, critical thinking, or self-expression.

“The PAST is the PAST, but the PRESENT is a GIFT from GOD ALMIGHTY!” (TRAINAISM)

“Our CHILDREN are a GIFT lent to U.S. by GOD and GOD ALMIGHTY has EMPOWERED U.S. to LOVE, HONOR, CHERISH and PROTECT them – Till DEATH do U.S. DEPART!” (TRAINAISM)

“If we as AMERICAN CITIZENS cannot PROTECT our CHILDREN, then LORD HELP U.S.!” (TRAINAISM)

“Any NATION that FAILS in its DUTY to PROTECT its CHILDREN is GENERATIONALLY DOOMED!” (TRAINAISM)

“CHILDREN are not just our FUTURE, they are also our PRESENT!” (TRAINAISM)

fatuous1 comments on the DISPLACED VALUES of the COMMON CORE CURRICULUM in MAY of 2014: “Our CHILDREN’S FUTURE is AT STAKE today, and what we do NOW will DEFINITLY impact them LATER in LIFE!” (TRAINAISM) “They say fatuous1, One man can’t STAND UP against TYRANNY, but I say, I will STAND UP against TYRANNA at least until the LORD LAYITH me DOWN!” (TRAINAISM)

“OPINION are like the fatuous1, EVERBODY has ONE!” (TRAINAISM)

“If the WORLD we LIVE in was less POLITICALLY CORRECT, then maybe we could just STOP LYING to one another!” (TRAINAISM)

“The TRUTH is sometimes UNCOUTH, but the TRUTH is the TRUTH – none the less!” (TRAINAISM)

“The WORLD’S GREATEST WRITERS are more often then not, also the WORLD’S GREATEST READERS – If you want to WRITE better READ more” (TRAINAISM)

“WRITING is CATHARTIC!” (TRAINAISM)

“Whenever an ISSUE or EVENT CAPTURES my HEART, I never have to GUIDE my PEN!” (TRAINAISM)

DIG, PUSH and be BOLD: http://features.aol.com/video/connie-chung-dig-push-and-be-bold?icid=aol|carousel|dl1