Re: V240 Status?

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 03:52:51PM +0100, J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> What other target functions do you have in mind?
The (not yet existing) equivalent of various asm functions like
sparc64_ipi_save_fpstate or sparc64_ipi_drop_fpstate.
But on the other hand I am not sure we are ever going to make this change --
so a minimalistic solution might be ok.
In that case, however, we should only have xc_send_ipi() left, and
completely remove sparc64_generic_xcall and sparc64_ipi_ccall.
Martin