Is it just me, or does he happen to bet on the AA fighter in each of his predictions.... at least the ones I've seen.

No, it's not just you. That's what he does in every one I have ever watched. I don't think anyone will get rich following his gambling advice. I just watch his videos to see how much I disagree with him. I should stop watching them but I usually watch them anyway. I am going to skip this one. I'll find out soon enough if he was right for a change. I think he said to bet on Bradley, so that's one for Dwyer.

No, it's not just you. That's what he does in every one I have ever watched. I don't think anyone will get rich following his gambling advice. I just watch his videos to see how much I disagree with him. I should stop watching them but I usually watch them anyway. I am going to skip this one. I'll find out soon enough if he was right for a change. I think he said to bet on Bradley, so that's one for Dwyer.

Yea, I didn't watch that video, but I bet on Bradley regardless.
Just didn't know if it was just me or if other people thought the same way but it was something to not talk about.

That is a funny way to go about it, isn't it? I mean who cares how good the odds are if you're going to lose?

Depends on the odds, I guess. If the betting odds on Thompson are 22-1 to win and you think he's only a 10 to 1 underdog, then that is a good bet. Dwyer strictly gives betting advice, so he often picks the underdog if he thinks the odds are too high (even if he thinks the guy will likely lose.)

Depends on the odds, I guess. If the betting odds on Thompson are 22-1 to win and you think he's only a 10 to 1 underdog, then that is a good bet. Dwyer strictly gives betting advice, so he often picks the underdog if he thinks the odds are too high (even if he thinks the guy will likely lose.)

I think he's on the train of thought that if you bet the underdog enough times, you're bound to win and profit... that usually only applies to MMA where underdogs have a higher chance of winning on the books

I think he's on the train of thought that if you bet the underdog enough times, you're bound to win and profit... that usually only applies to MMA where underdogs have a higher chance of winning on the books

Yeah but you can't just bet on every underdog, just the ones where you think the odds are unjustifiably high. They're high here because Thompson doesn't have much power and because the first fight was a bit closer than what most people remember.