Civil rights groups oppose the bill, saying it would allow discriminatory actions by businesses. But Yarbrough said his push was prompted by a New Mexico case where the state Supreme Court allowed a gay couple to sue a photographer who refused to take pictures of their wedding.

He said his effort is simply an attempt to clarify protections for religious beliefs, although he acknowledged current state law likely is adequate. He downplayed concerns that businesses like hotels, for instance, could refuse to rent rooms to gays or unmarried women under the measure, saying federal civil rights laws still apply.

“That’s all it does,” Yarbrough said. “And all this going crazy, lighting their hair on fire is misplaced.”

Last year’s legislation would have allowed people or religious groups to sue if they believed they might be subject to a government regulation that infringed on their religious rights. Yarbrough stripped that provision from the bill.

Article continues below

Civil-liberties and secular groups countered that Yarbrough and the Center for Arizona Policy had sought to minimize concerns that last year bill’s had far-reaching and hidden implications. They said the bill would allow people to break nearly any law and cite religious freedom as a defense.

The groups are still opposed, saying in testimony before a Senate committee Thursday that the bill aims to fix a problem that doesn’t exist and confer new rights on religious groups over minority groups.

“Freedom means freedom for everyone, and it is wrong to treat someone differently because of who they are,” said Rebecca Wininger, president of Equality Ar izona, a gay rights group.

Senate Bill 1062 passed the Senate Government and Environment Committee on a 4-2 party-line vote. It now heads to the full Senate after a review in the Senate Rules Committee.