It has taken less than 10 years to pry open the can of worms enshrouding the pathetic 9/11 scam. The central role of the major newsmedia corporations to pull off this sordid "terror" simulation has now been comprehensively exposed. Before joining this forum, please get familiar with the research at: http://www.septemberclues.info

I particularly like this 4x10 meter, 10 tons steel ( ) wall panel (three square steel columns held together by three steel spandrels (belts))that apparently was knocked free ( ) from 3 floors and, of course, adjacent wall panels at sides and above/below of the south wall of the north tower and then flew and landed on an empty parking lot (adjacent to St. Nicholas Church) ... with a landing gear tyre still attached.

I looks more like a 50 kg Hollywood stage property (of painted plywood) than a 10 ton piece of steel junk. I always wonder how NY City Police Dept moved it away and to where?

SmokingGunII wrote:So, for the record, this is where I am:1993: Fake Terrorist attack enables TPTB to empty the towers and gain control of it's infrastructure.Post 1993: Selected companies given office space in lower floors where emergency evacuation can be carried out within minutes.New "ghost" companies given office space in upper floors to reap maximum financial benefit when 9/11 comes around through fake victims, compensation, insurance claims etc.

9/11:First explosion alerts emergency responders and the workers in the lower floors in the towers. Towers cleared within 10 minutes."Contracted" first responders take control of immediate vicinty and cordon off area. Genuine first responders are ordered to move away from the immediate vicinity and secure a pre-designated area which will be safe from the demolition of the towers a little later. Some areas around WTC were on standby for this and are closed within minutes in readiness for planted materials.

2nd internal explosion coincides with planted materials being placed in position. Whilst all this is going on the Media/Military machine go into overdrive with fake actor witnesses and green screened pre-scripted interviews. Fake media witness phone callers to the major news channels corroborate the fake live news feeds and the 9/11 hoax is sold to the public and underway.....

I like your theory. One question, though. If the materials were already planted, why would they need to be placed in position?

This picture shows similar 10 tons wall panels (three columns + three spandrels) that were ripped off WTC1/2 during the alleged collapses , i.e. were detached from three floors and similar panels above/below/sidesright/left and then flow away and penetrated into adjacent buildings, where the wall panels then got stuck ... minus one column.The above picture + all others of the rubble are just stupid fakes. I always wonder why FBI and the NY Police department could not see it! Are they supporting terrorism?

That's supposed to be the Amex building. The Amex building is featured also in an old image showing the "plane fuselage" (see picture at right). But in that image, the TOP of the Amex building is depicted as a ridiculous GRID! [ ? ] FAIL/FAIL/FAIL! Atrocious digital composite FAIL!

SmokingGunII wrote:So, for the record, this is where I am:1993: Fake Terrorist attack enables TPTB to empty the towers and gain control of it's infrastructure.Post 1993: Selected companies given office space in lower floors where emergency evacuation can be carried out within minutes.New "ghost" companies given office space in upper floors to reap maximum financial benefit when 9/11 comes around through fake victims, compensation, insurance claims etc.

9/11:First explosion alerts emergency responders and the workers in the lower floors in the towers. Towers cleared within 10 minutes."Contracted" first responders take control of immediate vicinty and cordon off area. Genuine first responders are ordered to move away from the immediate vicinity and secure a pre-designated area which will be safe from the demolition of the towers a little later. Some areas around WTC were on standby for this and are closed within minutes in readiness for planted materials.

2nd internal explosion coincides with planted materials being placed in position. Whilst all this is going on the Media/Military machine go into overdrive with fake actor witnesses and green screened pre-scripted interviews. Fake media witness phone callers to the major news channels corroborate the fake live news feeds and the 9/11 hoax is sold to the public and underway.....

I like your theory. One question, though. If the materials were already planted, why would they need to be placed in position?

FredB - I typed this very quickly so let me clarify; I believe some of the planted evidence was near to it's final resting place, probably on the back of trucks, ready to be placed in position once the area was completely clear of prying eyes. Let's not forget - there were many offices around the WTC site, specifically where tyres and whatnot were found. You can't just stop everybody from going into work that morning. Similarly, you couldn't evacuate residents in that area prior to a terrorist attack. Even the most gullible American might find that just a little coincidental!

SmokingGunII wrote:So, for the record, this is where I am:1993: Fake Terrorist attack enables TPTB to empty the towers and gain control of it's infrastructure.Post 1993: Selected companies given office space in lower floors where emergency evacuation can be carried out within minutes.New "ghost" companies given office space in upper floors to reap maximum financial benefit when 9/11 comes around through fake victims, compensation, insurance claims etc.

9/11:First explosion alerts emergency responders and the workers in the lower floors in the towers. Towers cleared within 10 minutes."Contracted" first responders take control of immediate vicinty and cordon off area. Genuine first responders are ordered to move away from the immediate vicinity and secure a pre-designated area which will be safe from the demolition of the towers a little later. Some areas around WTC were on standby for this and are closed within minutes in readiness for planted materials.

2nd internal explosion coincides with planted materials being placed in position. Whilst all this is going on the Media/Military machine go into overdrive with fake actor witnesses and green screened pre-scripted interviews. Fake media witness phone callers to the major news channels corroborate the fake live news feeds and the 9/11 hoax is sold to the public and underway.....

I like your theory. One question, though. If the materials were already planted, why would they need to be placed in position?

FredB - I typed this very quickly so let me clarify; I believe some of the planted evidence was near to it's final resting place, probably on the back of trucks, ready to be placed in position once the area was completely clear of prying eyes. Let's not forget - there were many offices around the WTC site, specifically where tyres and whatnot were found. You can't just stop everybody from going into work that morning. Similarly, you couldn't evacuate residents in that area prior to a terrorist attack. Even the most gullible American might find that just a little coincidental!

I mostly agree with this, but I have my doubts about whether or not anyone who didn't work for a perp agency actually worked in the building after 1993. I grew up in NYC, and remember hanging out in Battery Park on a summer afternoon in 2000. I was surprised that the area wasn't busier with suits, but I remembered the long-standing rumors that from the very start, the WTC had difficulties filling vacancies.

I offer a few ideas for consideration:

1) As a tenant of the WTC, how affordable would liability and casualty insurance be for a firm that continues to send six and seven-figure earning employees to work in a building publicly being promoted as the biggest terrorist target in the country (see 1997 FEMA report cover below)?

Given that Wall Street likes to hire top Ivy League grads, I find it difficult to find references to employees suing their employer for "hazard pay" and negligence, incident to sending them to work in a terrorist target following the 1993 bombing and this 1997 FEMA report.

What if the FEMA report was created in anticipation of 9/11, with the intent of clearing out occupants and creating a broader back-story for the WTC-as-a-target?

2) What if the towers were operated like a mailbox service? In such a scheme, companies could purchase the prestige of a "One World Trade Center" address without actually occupying the space.

The mailbox lessees would be contradicting their purpose, promoting a façade of prestige and power for their firms, if they disclosed the fact that they never held physical offices in the WTC.

3) Depending on the school district, Mid-September marks the end of summer and the beginning of "back to school" in the northeast. It's quite possible that many folks who worked in the area were enjoying the final days of summer vacation with their families and school-age children on 9/11, thinning the population out some. 4) This wikipedia article on demolition states "Some materials must be removed, such as glass that can form deadly projectiles, and insulation that can scatter over a wide area."

This leads me to believe that it would be too risky to have people anywhere near the building before the well-planned main event takes place. You don't need the guy with IBS in the handicapped stall of the restroom running out late and catching a chard of glass in the back of his head!

AngellDust wrote:2) What if the towers were operated like a mailbox service? In such a scheme, companies could purchase the prestige of a "One World Trade Center" address without actually occupying the space. [list][*]The mailbox lessees would be contradicting their purpose, promoting a façade of prestige and power for their firms, if they disclosed the fact that they never held physical offices in the WTC.

Right on, Angelldust...

To be sure, there exist several companies offering just this sort of "VIRTUAL OFFICE" services:

ALLIANCE VIRTUAL OFFICES PLAN: http://www.alliancevirtualoffices.com/U ... ual-office"Alliance Virtual Offices offers any mobile entrepreneur and commercial organization, large or small, that is considering virtual office space, commercial real estate, meeting space, conference rooms, and prime business center access in New York City (without the Big Apple price tag), a large selection of different office space options from which to choose."

AngellDust wrote:2) What if the towers were operated like a mailbox service? In such a scheme, companies could purchase the prestige of a "One World Trade Center" address without actually occupying the space. [list][*]The mailbox lessees would be contradicting their purpose, promoting a façade of prestige and power for their firms, if they disclosed the fact that they never held physical offices in the WTC.

Right on, Angelldust...

To be sure, there exist several companies offering just this sort of "VIRTUAL OFFICE" services:

ALLIANCE VIRTUAL OFFICES PLAN: http://www.alliancevirtualoffices.com/U ... ual-office"Alliance Virtual Offices offers any mobile entrepreneur and commercial organization, large or small, that is considering virtual office space, commercial real estate, meeting space, conference rooms, and prime business center access in New York City (without the Big Apple price tag), a large selection of different office space options from which to choose."

Very interesting idea about the virtual offices or the summer vacation. However, to respond to AngellDust, let's not forget the vicsims! How to imagine that real offices or virtual offices of real companies were given fake victims and losses, only counting on the fact that such companies would remain "spontaneously" silent? Isn't a bit risky?

They could have used the mailbox-virtual office principle, in the sense of redirecting fake business form the WTC to other locations that handled the fakery-- but it seems to me that completely fake companies and personnel must have been a requirement for the security of the plan.

AngellDust wrote:2) What if the towers were operated like a mailbox service? In such a scheme, companies could purchase the prestige of a "One World Trade Center" address without actually occupying the space. [list][*]The mailbox lessees would be contradicting their purpose, promoting a façade of prestige and power for their firms, if they disclosed the fact that they never held physical offices in the WTC.

Right on, Angelldust...

To be sure, there exist several companies offering just this sort of "VIRTUAL OFFICE" services:

ALLIANCE VIRTUAL OFFICES PLAN: http://www.alliancevirtualoffices.com/U ... ual-office"Alliance Virtual Offices offers any mobile entrepreneur and commercial organization, large or small, that is considering virtual office space, commercial real estate, meeting space, conference rooms, and prime business center access in New York City (without the Big Apple price tag), a large selection of different office space options from which to choose."

Very interesting idea about the virtual offices or the summer vacation. However, to respond to AngellDust, let's not forget the vicsims! How to imagine that real offices or virtual offices of real companies were given fake victims and losses, only counting on the fact that such companies would remain "spontaneously" silent? Isn't a bit risky?

They could have used the mailbox-virtual office principle, in the sense of redirecting fake business form the WTC to other locations that handled the fakery-- but it seems to me that completely fake companies and personnel must have been a requirement for the security of the plan.

I never noticed (or forgot in the meantime) that clip at the pentagon that is visible during the interview. I have separated it and uploaded it to youtube:

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZI5Jg2VNSAw

It is shot in the same identical, eerie and staged style as Evan Fairbanks' videos (and others).The camera is at a weird height -- Fairbanks had it almost to the ground, in this video it towers above the heads of the people, as if the camera person was two meters tall. But the staged way by which people walk around, looking away, have the mark of most 9/11 faked products. I wonder who is the sick mind that directed all these things that are obviously shot in the same way, with little changes meant to give the illusion of variety...

The blatant function of The Simpsons episode in which "Homer" ('s Odyssey?) ascends and descends both towers, besides its occult meaning, would be to indicate that the place was crawling with employees really high up.

As others have suggested, they probably only had the touristy Windows on the World cult, and not much else.