THE LIBERTARIAN ENTERPRISE
Number 764, March 30, 2014Civilization is not inherited; it has to belearned and earned by each generation anew;if the transmission should be interruptedfor one century, civilization would die,and we should be savages again.—Will and Ariel Durant

My brother T.J. recently sent me a link to this article, which I
perused at length and found quite interesting:
[Link]
A bit of online research confirms that the information in the
article is substantiable.

I thought to myself, "This makes no sense. The solar astronomical data
is all pointing toward a decided cooling trend, and this cooling would
be on the same order as the much-hyped warming purported from
anthropogenic global climate change. If warming up by a couple of
degrees would be so catastrophic, wouldn't cooling down by the same
amount be just as bad? Why aren't they taking the solar variability
into account?"

And then it hit me.

You see, the more extreme Malthusian/Darwinian ecological perspectives
would have us believe that the planet is much better off with a much
smaller, or even nonexistent, human population. If we combine the
sunspot article with this one, we get a truly chilling (pardon the
pun) picture.
[Link]

From the first referenced article, "Both the UN and the IPCC know that
there is going to be a massive human die off should prolonged cooling
take place." And from the second, "Regardless of the methods used to
control population and whether they are imposed or self-imposed,
strict secrecy and deception have been necessary to prevent the masses
from discovering the bitter truth that for the past 68 years they have
been the object of a silent and global offensive, a campaign of
attrition that has turned the basic elements of life into weapons of
mass infertility and selective death."

Of course.

It would implement a semi-artificial Malthusian check. Of mammoth
proportions. (Given that another name for "Malthusian check" is
"Malthusian catastrophe.")

Which is what these particular leaders want. They are so sure that
"the planet would be better off without people" that they are
orchestrating the whole global warming fiasco in the face of impending
deep freeze to accomplish it. If our whole infrastructure is
orchestrated to support cooling the climate, at the same time that our
sun goes into an extended cool cycle, the global results would be
catastrophic. Untold millions could—and probably would—die,
infrastructures could collapse, and the worldwide population might
well be reduced to subsistence living, "hand to mouth" survival.

Infrastructures are like elephants: hard to get moving, and just as
hard to stop. When once our infrastructures are hardwired to "prevent
global warming," it will be next to impossible to change directions
once it becomes obvious we are headed into global cooling.

And the population as a whole will be doomed.

Except for those few in the catbird seat, those in control, who—like
the Soviet leaders before them—live palatially at the expense of
everyone else.

"Nero" and his cohorts will fiddle while Rome...freezes.

Was that worth reading?Then why not:

This site may receive compensation if a product is purchasedthrough one of our partner or affiliate referral links. Youalready know that, of course, but this is part of the FTC DisclosurePolicy found here. (Warning: this is a 2,359,896-byte 53-page PDF file!)TLE AFFILIATE