Daniel Murphy and the Cubs’ Message to Their LGBTQ Fans

It shouldn’t be too much to ask of a baseball front office to ask, “Hey, when the team has the best record in the league, can you avoid doing something that makes me feel awful about rooting for them?”

And yet two years later, here we are again.

After bringing aboard the execrable Aroldis Chapman and asking the fanbase to overlook the scourge of his domestic violence charges, a lot of us hoped that was a one time only violation of “The Cubs Way.” Furthermore, we optimistically rationalized to ourselves, Theo Epstein only decided to bring aboard a player of heinous character because he wanted to go all out and finally break the 108 year championship drought that was the bane of our collective existence. It sure sounded like a good excuse.

Unfortunately, in retrospect, the lesson the front office appeared to learn from 2016 was “Bringing in players with heinous character works.”

The lifestyle. As if being gay were a phase we picked up because there was a body glitter sale at Hot Topic.

And now he’s a part of the team I love. It’s doubly disappointing because over the years, there had been small signs that the Cubs were putting forth an effort to be a sports organization that genuinely valued the LGBTQ community. Famously, Laura Ricketts became the first openly gay owner in league history—and the fact that she was able to do so coming from an otherwise staunchly conservative family made her story that much more impressive.

With Laura as a member of ownership, the Cubs made genuine efforts to ally with the community, going so far as to reschedule a June game in 2014 that would have been played on the same day as the Pride Parade in Boystown. The team also made sure it had a visible presence in that parade year after year, sending legends like Ernie Banks and Ryne Sandberg to represent them on the Cubs Pride float.

(As a personal aside, a quick search of my archives on BP will show you the extent of my Ryno fanboyhood. And seeing my all time favorite player in a position where he was such a visible part of Pride made my heart soar as much as watching him step to the plate against Bruce Sutter. It might have been a small gesture on his part but coming from a player who spent his prime in the hyper-toxically masculine ’80s and ’90s, it meant something.)

And then this year, we got to witness Jon Lester making a genuine effort to engage and listen to LGBTQ Cubs fandom on Twitter in the wake of Josh Hader’s bigoted tweets becoming a national story. I was never going to go overboard and think that all of these actions meant that the Cubs locker room was rededicating itself to helping Armie Hammer patch things up with Timothée Chalamet. But all of these little gestures put together made it seem like I could cheer for them as a gay man and think, “You made the right choice in a baseball team.”

Which is why the Murphy acquisition feels like such a slap in the face. It’s telling the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer members of Cub fandom that “Your dignity matters. As long as it doesn’t get in the way of winning.”

Theo Epstein has many wonderful qualities and I’ve made no secret of my admiration for what he’s done for this franchise and this fanbase. But his sometimes misanthropic pursuit of winning at all costs is far and away his worst feature. And the mental hurdles he’s put this fanbase through as we try to figure out whether it’s worth supporting a team that meant so much before they decided to go all Dallas Cowboys on their roster construction has gotten much more exhausting than rooting for a sports team should be.

As you might have noticed a few paragraphs ago, I’m gay. (Or the fact that I’ve made references to Love, Simon and Call Me By Your Name for two pieces in a row might have clued you in. Keep your eyes peeled for next week’s article: “LaStella Mia! Here I Go Again…”) I spent a painfully long time in the closet to get to the point where I could write that sentence without freaking out, but I got there.

And as someone who delayed acknowledging my true self, I can tell you with certainty that when someone of Murphy’s stature is able to spout hateful words with neither repercussion nor anyone calling him out on it, that sends the message that remaining in the closet is the only logical option for your professional and personal well being. Hell, you don’t even have to take my word for it. Just a couple days ago, Dusty Baker told Ken Rosenthal…

“I think more would have changed on the racial front than the gay front… like I said, it’s a microcosm of society. Guess what? There are some gay guys in baseball. They must be tortured inside but they’re blessed with the ability to play baseball.”

You don’t have to think too hard to realize that the acceptance of Murphy and his views within clubhouse culture are a stark reminder to any gay player that they come out at their own peril.

To be fair, through his position with MLB, Bean has made a concerted effort to try and help bring Murphy into the 21st century. His goal has been to win Murphy over through acts of kindness, striking up a friendship with his family and asking him to “consider things from a different perspective.” Which says a lot about the kind of person Billy Bean is.

And, unfortunately, next to nothing at all about Daniel Murphy. To this point, we haven’t heard a thing from him regarding the hateful things he’s said in the past. Not an ounce of genuine contrition nor an acknowledgement of our humanity. He hasn’t even offered up a half-assed “I was a different person back then” excuse.

You know things are bad when your level of contrition can be described as “sub-Hader.” I’ve already taken the precaution of muting literally every single member of Brewers Twitter until after Murphy’s first Wrigley Field at bat.

And unless we hear anything resembling genuine remorse and understanding, we can only assume that Murphy’s views today are the same as they were when he expressed them in 2015. Only now, he’s got a guy to point to and say “I can’t be a bigot… I’ve got a gay friend!”

It sucks that a guy like Daniel Murphy is being thrown into what is once again an incredibly likable and enjoyable team (this past week’s offensive Sahara notwithstanding). It doubly sucks knowing that an otherwise admirable player like Anthony Rizzo or Kyle Schwarber might end up saying something tone deaf because baseball culture demands that guys defend their teammates no matter what.

Some day, I would hope Epstein might realize that his legacy in Chicago is already secure and that he doesn’t need to import the very worst people in baseball to keep chasing ring after ring. Given the core he’s built, it should be a truly difficult feat to make any of his teams unlikable. That’s one challenge I wish he wouldn’t take up.

Share

Related Articles

10 comments on “Daniel Murphy and the Cubs’ Message to Their LGBTQ Fans”

Christopher

It’s nice to know that people who disagree with you about fundamental human issues are the very worst people in baseball. Please let the rest of us deplorables know how to arrange our morality to suit you.

Sorry Christopher. There are some “fundamental human issues” that reasonable people might disagree about. LGBTQ civil rights ain’t one of them. Your morality sounds a lot like the fans who spat on Jackie Robinson because he had the nerve to play baseball while black. Like those fans, you are on the wrong side of history.

While LGBTQ rights are a fundamental human issue about which there should be no disagreement among reasonable people, people like Daniel Murphy have effectively been indoctrinated through years of bible study/church/evangelicalism that are stuck in the 1960’s.

It is easy for me to say that they are wrong, and they are on the wrong side of history. It is easy for me to preach that they need to change their ways. But it is not easy for me to call him deplorable, or a person of “heinous character”. He could be a good person. I like the fact that he took the 3 days off for the birth of his child. And I don’t hold this against the front office. I’m happy they went out and got a guy to bolster the lineup. But one guy does not make a clubhouse; the clubhouse and team should not be judged by the lowest common denominator. I’m sure that if we had the capability, we could find bad dirt on just about everyone–including authors on this site.

“While LGBTQ rights are a fundamental human issue about which there should be no disagreement among reasonable people”

because?

moral high grounds are piles of shifting sand

what is at stake here is that the moral high ground of one order-tge crusty judeo-christian one-is giving way to another moral order. believers believe: the truth of their moral order almost always seems obvious and indisputable to them.

Literally no one is talking about taking away anyone’s rights. We’re talking about the right to competing world views. If I don’t agree with yours, that doesn’t mean you’re any less of a person. I fail to see how my inability to condone another person’s value system invalidates that system. I don’t insist that others condone mine when they disagree. It’s funny how that ratchet only goes one way.

Good lord why are you so offended? You got so mad about something this dude said 3 years ago that you sat down angrily at your computer and wrote this. Grow up. 99% of gay people wouldn’t give a damn about this. He’s not a scholar, not a teacher, not even someone remotely important. He’s play a game. You want all these guys to be 100% enlightened on social issues?

So don’t root for the team anymore. Switch to another team that has 25 completely perfect human beings like you on it.

The real offense here is how you hand pick the quote you want to fit the article.

For everyone else’s viewing pleasure …

“I disagree with his lifestyle,” Murphy said. “I do disagree with the fact that Billy is a homosexual. That doesn’t mean I can’t still invest in him and get to know him. I don’t think the fact that someone is a homosexual should completely shut the door on investing in them in a relational aspect. Getting to know him. That, I would say, you can still accept them but I do disagree with the lifestyle, 100 percent.”