This
report which came to be called the Munir
Report, sheds a great deal of light on present matters pertaining to
the movement toward Shia kafirdom in Pakistan. The methods used
against the Ahmadiyas by the Ahrar
almost exactly 60 years ago is a mirror image of the methods being
used today by the Tafriki-Lej-alphabet-acronym-soup
(enumerated in my article: Some
Context for What's Transpiring in Pakistan and What Not to do in the
Upcoming 2013 Elections) against the largely
defenseless and unarmed Shia Muslims of Pakistan.

The
key difference to me between then and now is exactly one (apart from
the palpable fact that it was Ahmadis then
and Shias now):

Then
the government was incapacitated into taking no action against the
Ahrar's terrorism due to political
considerations in the fragile new Pakistan, and inadvertently let
the conditions between 1948-1952 exacerbate by wavering in its
determination to curb the politically motivated religious fanaticism
of the Ahrar leading to the riots of 1953 in Punjab against the
Ahmadis and the concomitant declaration of Pakistan's first martial
law in Punjab. In other words, then, as is evident from the Munir
Report, the situation was created due to political incompetence and
political calculus of the political officialdom in the new Pakistan
that the law and order deteriorated to that extent. Meaning, the
officialdom did not want it, and the Ahmadiya killings occurred
because of keeping political stability was deemed more important
than immediately curbing the law and order situation with a just but
unflinching hand and possibly exacerbating the situation.

Whereas
today, virtually all the power-wielders in Pakistan, some within the
govt., both federal and state, I am sure also district down to the
local thaana (police station) level, and
some within the Military and nearly all of the intelligence
apparatuses, and some within the media, I would say all the media
both local and foreign, and also big businesses (including
enterprises like Nestle Pakistan that has been supplying water to
the occupation troops in Afghanistan for the past 12 years and part
of officialdom in no less a measure than those officially drawing a
salary from the national treasury), comprise the 'new Ahrar'. And,
therefore, unlike what one sees in the Munir Report of repeated
governmental officials writing memos to senior administrators and
leaders to take stern action against the Ahrar, one will surely find
no such memos in today's government as all the officialdom is
together the 'new Ahrar'. I have already
analyzed why I they think the officialdom of Pakistan is the 'new
Ahrar' under the title 'The
New SAVAK in Pakistan'.

And
all indications continue to pile up that the Shias are being goaded
into militantly rising up (by killing a sufficient number of them) to
create a full scale internecine war in
Pakistan; Muslims killing Muslims once again to fertilize the “shia
crescent”. This is beyond any proxy
warfare between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and while its seeds are surely
planted in the deep seated shia-sunni differences, these spate of
shia killings and the accompanying propaganda warfare upon the Shia
Muslims of Pakistan is not due to Shia Sunni issue which is fourteen
centuries old.

Both
of those aforementioned factors that the media harps about, and the
politicians variously draw upon with approaching elections in
Pakistan, are misleading and calculated red herrings to disguise the
real purpose behind this warfare. Unfortunately, due to the media
participation in the New SAVAK project,
more and more Shia and Sunni public are both getting confused about
it.

Don't
get confused ---- it is a fabricated war along the Hegelian Dialectic
that I have by now surely explained to death on my website and have
now stopped explaining altogether. It's like kicking an already dead
dog to death.

But
if you do not understand Hegel, you cannot possibly make sense of any
of the apparent insanity in Pakistan. It is not insanity, but a
calculated game-theory laced warfare being waged upon Pakistan to
create a perpetual enemy for the West.

In
the next five years, there will likely arise a "Hezbollah"
Pakistan in reaction to the oppression by the New SAVAK
in Pakistan, and that is more than arm chair prediction. It is an
inevitability if the oppression upon the Shias of Pakistan continues.

One
can see that the Shias of Pakistan have been the most docile of
communities in Pakistan, largely self-obsessed in their rituals and
silently minding their own business amidst all the war on terror
being waged upon the world by the mightiest tyrants in the world
despite their lofty principled sloganeering that has defined the shia
ethos for fourteen centuries. One is forced to wonder why Shia
militancy is being “tickled” into existence if not to
bring to fruition the long awaited "shia
crescent".

Two
matched and armed to the teeth nemesis will paint Lahore to Karachi
more red than Peshawar to Quetta have been painted thus far
unilaterally by the "new Ahrar" and the "new SAVAK".

A
smart self-respecting people will surely always rise to defend
themselves --- but simultaneously, also refuse to be used as stooges
and patsies by declining to become the West's perpetual enemy.

To
not make the same national suicidal mistake as Iran takes a lot more
wherewithal, national sha-oor, than has
been publicly displayed by even the finest in Pakistan. For a nation
not known for either the abundance of its intellectual prowess, or
the superfluity of its noble integrity, it is not hard to perceive
that Pakistan was stochastically designed to be DOA
(dead on arrival) into this world.

I
will end by quoting the last paragraph of the Munir Report, and if
what it says was true then at the very inception of Pakistan, only
the janaza (funeral) remains to be recited
(I hope of course that I am wrong and persons of great commonsense
will miraculously come to the forefront of national leadership to
untie the Gordian knot so craftily tied on Pakistan's destiny on the
Grand Chessboard):

"And
it is our deep conviction that if the Ahrar had been treated as a
pure question of law and order, without any political considerations,
one District Magistrate and one Superintendent of Police could have
dealt with them. Consequently, we are prompted by something that they
call a human conscience to enquire whether, in our present state of
political development, the administrative problem of law and order
cannot be divorced from a democratic bed fellow called a Ministerial
Government, which is so remorselessly haunted by political
nightmares. But if democracy means the subordination of law and order
to political ends—then Allah knoweth best and we end the
report."

Reprint License

All
material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with
full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety,
unmodified and unedited, for any purpose, granted in perpetuity,
provided the source URL sentence and this copyright notice are also reproduced verbatim as part
of this restricted Reprint License, along with any embedded links within its
main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license
violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All figures, images,
quotations and excerpts, are used without permission based on
non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research
use only in the greater public interest, documenting crimes
against humanity, deconstructing current affairs, and scholarly
commentary. The usage by Project Humanbeingsfirst of all external
material is minimally consistent with the understanding of "fair
use" laws at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html.
Project Humanbeingsfirst does not endorse any external website or organization it links to or references, nor those that may link to it or reprint its works.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you
are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your
request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents
in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the
documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You
are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from
other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”.