This document prepared by JULIO BÁEZ FONSECA, Former Supervisor of the Ministry of Education, is a P PROPOSAL or TIP for regulation by the Educational
Institutions, Institutional Assessment System students, according to the
autonomy granted to them that standard.

Developed in this proposal, the eleven issues that must contemplate the SYSTEM, and are part of the PEI chapter that
discusses evaluation and promotion of students, according to Article 4
of Decree 1290-1209.

It also proposes that management should be given to the articles of Decree.

This document was prepared based on guidance contained in Resolution
17486 of 1984, which was the standard that was current evaluation and
promotion to the issuance of Decree 1860 of 1994, Chapter VI, regulatory
law 115-94, and which I also took into account;addition of Decree 230 of 2002, and a preliminary draft prepared by JULIO BÁEZ and HECTOR FERNANDEZ.

Much of this content, I did it based on the experience of management
of casuistry evaluation and promotion that was given in recent years in
most schools in the country, opposite the interpretation of the rules
that were in effect and caused some confusion in many of them, which
touched my guide and respond from the MEN.

This day of casuistry and guardianships lost many schools, allow me to
present this proposal to the analyzed establishments with executives,
teachers, parents and students, making adjustments, corrections and
additions to it customize according to your needs and requirements to
the institution, enabling them to create the AGREEMENT approval and adoption by the Board and the Rector.

Once the Board approves AGREEMENT by the Rector Rector adopts by Resolution.This process is done every year with appropriate adjustments.

This proposal is already plastered on a draft agreement to be reviewed
and approved by the Governing Board of the institution, as described
below:

PROPOSED AGREEMENT No.

By which it regulates and adopts the Institutional System Evaluation
and Promotion of Students of School (name _________________________
Township campus by 2010.

The Board of the institution, given the autonomy granted by Decree
1290 of 2009 recommendations of the Academic Council and the educational
community in general, regulates and adopts the following parameters of
evaluation and promotion of students by 2010.

EVALUATION CRITERIA OR ION PROMOCI NY.

The evaluation on campus will be:

CONTINUES:ie they make topermanently by tracking students, allowing observe the progress and difficulties encountered in the process of formation or n.Will be made ​​to the end of each topic, unit, period, class or process.

INTEGRAL:all aspects or dimensions of student development, as written to show the process of learning and knowledge organization or n to n tests will have in mind.

You apply the ensuring consultation of texts, notes, troubleshooting
and situations, testing, analysis, interpretation, proposal,
conclusions, and other ways that teachers consider relevant and
independicen the results, factors related only with simple remembrances
or memorizing words, names, dates, facts, figures, outcome, and do not
take into account the process of exercise and are not related to the
realization of concepts and cognitive factors.

The observation of behaviors,attitudes, values, skills, everyday performance, knowledge, recording
in detail the indicators of achievement in which they develop, and
demonstrate cultural changes social, personal and student.

The dialogue with the studentand parent, as an element of reflection and analysis, for information
supplementary to that obtained in the observation and written tests.

Self-evaluation by the students themselves,
and the participation of parents in assessing their children through
training tasks left for the house will be allowed, and that parents
assess compliance writing them in student notebooks.

The peer assessment between students when written or conceptual tests are developed within the classroom.

Conversationswith the same intention of dialogue, conducted between teacher and student or a group of them.

SISTEM Á TICA: theymake to the Evaluation or n taking into account the principles
pedag or cal and save relationship or n with the goals, objectives of
education or n, the vision or mission or ny n the campus, is to ndares
competence of different areas to the accomplishments, indicators of
achievement, curriculum guidelines or structure c fic ient of the WHO
areas, content, m ethods and other partners in the process of formation
or comprehensive student n factors.

FLEXIBLE;it will have to n into account the rhythms of development of
students in various aspects of inter é s, skills, learning rates,
difficulties, limitations of emotional, family, nutritional type, social
environment, f í SICAS, disability of any í Ndole, own styles, giving a
differential special handling and sec u n relevant to the problem or
diagnosed by professionals tics.

Teachers identify the personal characteristics of their students in
special skills, possibilities and limitations, to give them a fair and
equitable treatment in evaluations according to the detected problems,
in particular by providing opportunities to learn from success, error
and life experience.

INTERPRETIVE: theyallow students to understand the meaning of the processes and
the results obtained, and together with the teacher, make reflections on
the achievements and failures;to establish corrective pedag or logical to enable it to advance its development as normal.

Assessments and their results will be as clear in its intention and
interpretation, which does not lead to conflicts of interest among
students against teachers or vice versa.

Participatory: it is involved in the
Evaluation o n the student, teacher, parent and other entities that
contribute to make a good m ethods to which they are students who
develop classes, work in forums, round table, work group discussions,
seminars, exhibitions, practices and field workshop in order to achieve
inter skills to analyze, interpret and propose with the orientation or
ny Accompaniment teacher.

TRAINING:we can redirect í educational processes and methodologies as,
when evidence of reprobaci or n to occur in any area, analyzing the
causes and looking to classroom learning, affects the behavior and
attitudes of students in salt or n, in the street, at home and in the
community in which it operates.

CRITERIA FOR PROMOTION OR ION REPROBACI NY

With the above criteria we defined the promotion or disapproval of students as follows:

The student who fails to finish school lis to one or two areas
with PERFORMANCE ñ or low, is promoted and enrollment in the next grade
as APPROVED.One will have to lis to present leveling é stas to areas failed by the following dates:

The d ay following the return of the Easter recess.

The d í to return from holiday following the mid-lis.

The d ay following the return of school break of the 2ndsemester.

The ú last week lis school before the close of studies.

If these four (4) times not level, it is considered failed that grade
and will have to validate it before graduation because not be able to
obtain the title of "BS" with losses in any grade of basic education
areas and a half except in cases of lost and not recovered over the life
of Decree 230-02 which are already definitively lost and therefore they
can graduate areas.

OPTIONS

The schools that do not agree with this option are encouraged these other or the school determine:

the student who loses one or two areas is promoted to the next grade
and has time to level up to 9th grade, in which case, to obtain the
certificate or n culmination of education or nb sic, should be the d ay
in all areas up to this degree, otherwise not be promoted to ad é cimo
of education or half n.

Students who miss one or two areas to be promoted to the next grade
and has time to level up to eleventh grade as a prerequisite for the t t
ter's degree.

NIVELACI OR ACTIVITIES N.

Students who complete the school year to obtain valuation UNDER
performance in one or two areas, leveling submit these areas over the
next year on the dates specified above with the following criteria:

The leveling are actions or activities to reinforce, complement,
research, practice, projects are designed and programmed by each teacher
in your area or course, to be developed and demonstrated by students.

Teachers use for this student monitors that help in explaining and
understanding of the achievements and indicators that students have had
difficulties in their performance.We also have the collaboration of parents, commissions evaluation and
promotion or any other form that does not involve the suspension of
classes to advance and demonstrate such activities.

The leveling of the lost year-end areas will not only imposing an
essay or making a written test content or exercises, but personal and
direct demonstration of the student to the teacher that exceeded both
the cognitive part as formative in social, personal and academic
development.

ION REPROBACI

Students who miss three or more areas with poor performance is
considered failed grade and must enroll to repeat throughout the
following year.

There will be promoted to the next grade, students who have stopped
attending the campus, 20% of the school year unexcused duly justified
and accepted by the school, which must be repeated.

ION PROMOCI GRADE EARLY

The evaluation and promotion committees recommend to the Rectory,
early promotion from grade to grade, students at any time of the first
semester of the school year, consistently demonstrate superior
performance in the acquisition of indicators and achievements, and meet
exceptional conditions of cognitive, attitudinal and procedural
development among others.

Teachers holders of degrees in the case of elementary school, and the
respective areas in primary and junior secondary (except the 11th grade
that must take full) recommend commissions grade promotion in advance of
students with the characteristics described above.

If the fees are worthwhile to address the request made ​​by teachers
to the principal of course, is made ​​an Act for the Rector properly
supported, so that it produces the Chancellor's Resolution to legalize
the situation, after consulting that will make it to the tutor and
student is promoted in advance.

Final assessments of each area are issued at the time of advance for
promotion, and copy of the resolution shall rest in the gradebook, plus
deliver the promoted student.

DESIGNACI TION OF A SECOND EVALUATOR

When duly verified exceptional circumstances, such as sexual
harassment, religious discrimination, politics, family, race, revenge or
another, a teacher retest at year-end assessment of a student, the
evaluation and promotion committee may recommend to the Rector,
designating a second evaluator in the same campus area or another, for
evaluation and assessment, which will remain as definitive in the
certificate in the share of "COMMENTS", because in the box in the
reprobate, is will write the record holder given by the teacher.

GRADUATION ION

The institution will be advanced only the graduation ceremony for students of eleven.At other levels and cycles closing ceremony will be held.

The t í title of Bachelor students of juniors who have passed all levels and cycles including eleven grants.

About coursed the average level of "High School Acad é mico" t í
receive such title, and if performed alg ú n "é emphasis" offered by the
campus, é ste are granted a Certificate Diploma separately, noting the
intensity Total time of the emphasis é or deepening or n.

Those who completed the average level of "Bachelor T é technician"
are granted this title stating t t s in addition to the same modality or
specialty that they advanced.

If you fail to rea T é the technique in either degrees Media T é
technique, you can not graduate until proven in nivelaci or n during the
following lis, which manages or dominates said unto area.You are not granted title of Bachelor t í é Acad mico for not being on the modality or curs.

N to not receive eleventh grade students of Bachelor T é technician to go to attend High School cimo d é é mico Acad.

Grade students who will cimo d é é High School T technician, may enroll in eleven é mico School Acad.

The student culminating grade eleven and has outstanding leveling
areas to `` not do so in the next lis is considered lost that grade and
must take the course again asThis can not be validated.

Students who complete grade eleven and lose one or two areas could
to n to level them before the graduation ceremony or before the start of
the new school week lis, so they can go to college or pay subsequent
military service if their share, and these leveling receive their t n to
t ter's degree.

If you do not have the grading on these two occasions, have the lis below to do so.

CERTIFICATE OF EDUCATION Ó Á NB SICA

Students who complete their 9th grade and have passed all areas
including those in earlier grades, receive a certificate stating the
completion of this Level of Basic Education.

Upon completion of the basic education level, no ceremony, but closing.

The degree of pre-evaluatedand promoted in accordance with Article 10 of Decree 2247 of 1997 on preschool education, ie not retest.At this level there is no graduation ceremony but closing.

Rating Be Ó N SCALE INSTITUTIONAL AND METHOD WITH NATIONWIDE.

For purposes of the bimonthly level students in each of the areas, they take into account the following endpoints:

Will be made ​​to n é rich num rating of 1-10 in each area to whole units of 1, 1.5 - 2 - 2.5 - 3 - 3.5 and so on until 10 í.

This num é rica scale equivaldr each quarter to the national scale PERFORMANCE Superior ñ os, Alto, B asic and Lower;thereforen bimonthlynewslettersto be issued in two columns a num é rich and another for the

national equivalent, along with a brief description explaining in
clear and understandable language for the educational community, on the
strengths and difficulties experienced by the students in their overall
performance during this period, with recommendations and strategies for
improvement.

The scale of the final report will be issued
in definitive certificates also in two columns a number of 1-10 and the
other with the equivalent national concepts of Superior Performance,
High, and Low Basic descriptive, explanatory way, in objective and
understandable language for the educational community.

The final report will be given the comprehensive assessment of student
training in each area throughout the school year, noting that the end
of grade, are reached achievements, skills and standards proposed for
the year in PEI.

This final report will not be the sum and average bimonthly reports,
but the analysis that the teacher makes his student in academic and
educational performance throughout the degree:

The rating scale campus will be:

- Superior Performance 9.0 to 10

- High Performance 7.5 to 8.5

- Basic Performance 6.0 to 7.0

- Performance Under 1.0 to 5.5

REPROBACI TION OF REAS

Students will evaluate Low performance when they reach the end of the
school year, 60% of expected accomplishments for the area, in which case
this area is considered rejected and will have to engage in leveling
the case of a or two areas disapproved.

With three areas Underperforming is considered Fail grade which must be repeated in its entirety.

In the four periodic reports will be considered for purposes of approving each area, 60% of the indicators of achievements.

ION STRATEGIES Rating Be INTEGRAL OF PERFORMANCE CHILDREN OF STUDENTS.

In all partial or total evaluations to be made ​​to students, are considered classroom processes as follows:

Accomplishments and indicators of each area to the respective degree
are defined, taking into account the Purposes of Educational System,
Millennium by levels and cycles, Visi Misi n or n or campus, to ndares b
Est skills to musicians and Guidelines curricular.

The different activities and ways of assessing students throughout
the area to development, so having correspondence with the indicators,
achievements and skills set for per í ears are located and all lis
school .

Is to observe the work of students to develop the activities, tasks,
tests, to former regimes, behaviors, skills, values, PERFORMANCE ñ or
personal and social, and others that affect their formation or an
integral n.

Each teacher prepares the value judgments that according to the
nature of their area, they must demonstrate their performance lis
students, determining levels, internal and external circumstances,
limitations or facilities to achieve them.

Finally decisions that enable all students to reach m s high levels
of indicators, achievements and competencies that enable their
promotional or na upper grades of the educational system, reflected in
valuation scales num é rich and conceptual described are taken above.

FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE CHILDREN

As the evaluation is an ongoing process, teachers do with students
after each class, subject, unit or period, activities such as written
tests, essays, talks, personal or group dialogues, exhibitions, tasks,
field or workshop, exercises strengthening and deepening practical
application training tasks to develop at home, contact parents to engage
them and hold them accountable in the educational process of their
children.

N is to identify the limitations and abilities of students, to adapt
the lis design curriculum to the reality of school and the educational
community.

No meetings will be made ​​to the Commissions EVALUATION ny or
promotional ion, especially when learning glaring deficiencies occur at
some level or á n u rea, that with the participation ation of students
and parents, seek alternatives ny of solution or improvement.

N is designated to students who have good performance monitors acad é
Economic and staff to help with difficulties, to help them overcome in
the days contrary;aid to be delivered at the College or in the homes of the students themselves.

Nivelaci ation activities for students are made ​​with low or you PERFORMANCE ñ regular at times the teacher sees fit.

Upon completion lis school, these were held throughout the lis below, with the help of instructors and parents.

AUTOEVALUACI OR PROCESSES OF STUDENTS

In addition to tests and activities that the teacher takes her
students on an ongoing basis, drills and exercises for reflection,
analysis and interpretation which will allow students to do
self-reflection and conceptual assessments and formative character,
which has a value will be very important in assessing period-end or year
is made, provided that such self-evaluation has led students to improve
their knowledge and behaviors.

N is har to collective self-assessments that allow s in addition to
performing coevaluaciones between students, as exercises to pr cticos in
class.

With professional assistance or service Orientaci n school, seminars
pr to cticos inducing and clarify students are done, the importance of
knowing judgmental with responsibility and honesty, their skills and
limitations.

SUPPORTING STRATEGIES TO RESOLVE OR SITUATIONS Pedag GICAS OUTSTANDING STUDENTS

Leveling

Students who complete the school year to obtain valuation UNDER
performance in one or two areas, will have a maximum term year for
grading activities necessary and sufficient to overcome these low
performance.

(I Consider also é n the other two options presented in the subtitle
of "C riteria for promotional or ny reprobaci ion" of paragraph one of
this proposal).

These activities are designed as supporting actions, research,
complementation, projects, practices, rehearsals, planned and developed
by each teacher in their area, and which must be developed and
demonstrated by students, either after school, periods school or
completion of the school year.

For this purpose the designated teacher monitors students to help
their peers in understanding and obtaining indicators, achievements and
skills which they have struggled, and also have the cooperation of
parents, commissions appraisal and promotion , school orientation, or
any other means not involving the suspension of classes for such
activities.

The leveling of the areas reproved the end of the school year are
performed by the dates specified in Paragraph 1 of this AGREEMENT.

MEASURES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE BY DIRECTORS AND TEACHERS TO MEET THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SYSTEM EVALUATION INSTITUTIONAL ION.

To ensure compliance with the provisions of this AGREEMENT, members of
the BOARD, the Academic Council, Student Council or Assembly of the
Association of Parents, be aware, that these guidelines are known and
disclosed before all the Community Education, for when they detect an
irregularity, they can run in the first instance to the Evaluation and
Promotion Committees, the Board or the respective Ministry of Education.

To support the evaluation and promotion, the Academic Council proposes
to the Board, the creation of the following committees Evaluation and
Promotion of students:

A commission or n for grades 1-3.

A commission or n for grades 4 and 5.

A commission or n for grades 6-9.

A commission or n for grades 10 and 11.

These fees are integrated with representatives of teachers, parents and students.(Here each school write how you want these commissions are integrated).

Each site or subsite of School, will have its own integrated
assessment committees and promoting similar to headquarters campus
manner.

Functions Committees Evaluation and Promotion

Teachers convene general meetings or to areas, to analyze and
propose pol í tics, m ethods and trends in the processes of EVALUATION
or n in the classroom.

Guide teachers to review the pr tactics to pedag ogical and
evaluative, to overcome the indicators and achievements to students who
have difficulties in its acquisition or n.

PERFORMANCE analyze relevant situations ñ os low, or to areas where
reprobaci degrees or n be persistent, to recommend to teachers, students
and parents, corrective needed to overcome them.

Analyze and recommend on situations for promotional or n advance,
for outstanding students who demonstrate exceptional abilities, or for
the Promotion or ordinary n of students with disabilities notorious.

Serve as deciding on claims that students, parents or teachers, they
consider may present has been violated alg ú n law in the assessment
process or n, and recommend to the designaci o n a second evaluator in
exceptional cases .

Check and check that principals and teachers comply with the
provisions of the Institutional evaluation system or n defined in this
AGREEMENT.

Other determining the institution or é na trav s IEP.

Its own regulations.

FREQUENCY OF DELIVERY OF REPORTS TO STUDENTS AND PARENTS.

During the school year students and parents, four reports with value
judgments derived from the evaluation will be delivered with reference
to four (4) equal periods for the school year.

These reports will be written, descriptive, explanatory, objectives
and a clear and accessible to the community language, with two
assessment scales, numerical and another with the National level.

At the end of the school year, the fifth (5th) will be the final
report, which includes a comprehensive assessment of student academic
performance in their social, personal and delivery.

Evaluations of classes, units, jobs, tasks are given to students in the week following the completion of the same, and know

prior to delivery of the bimonthly reports, the end result of two
months, to the respective claims before the authorities established on
campus before being passed to the newsletters.

STRUCTURE OF REPORTS OF STUDENTS

Reports that students are given every period and the final report, have the names and identifying them.They are the areas studied in each grade with weekly hourly intensity of each and total grade.

In two columns is written in a numerical evaluation of one (1) to ten (10).

In the next column, will evaluate Superior performance Alto, Basic and
Low agree with the numerical equivalence described in paragraph 2 of
this AGREEMENT, and then an objective, explanatory description of the
strengths and weaknesses demonstrated in period or evaluated year, based
on indicators, achievements and competencies achieved.At the end of the report, a few lines with the word "COMMENTS", in
which the general behavior demonstrated by the student's educational and
ethical process described during the period or year, with outstanding
or deficient aspects and recommendations described are located for
improvement.

Newspapers and final evaluation reports are delivered on letterhead of
the College with the term "CERTIFICATE" and are signed only by the
Rector of the establishment or his delegate for progress reports.

The Secretaries not signed Certificates in accordance with Decree 2150 of 1995.

Students and parents to consider is committed some injustice or
violation of due process, respectful requests submitted in writing to
the following instances campus, to be served their claims:

The teacher in the classroom.

The Commission EVALUATION or n or n or promotional ny.

The Rector of the Establishment.

The Steering Board.

The above instances have a maximum of five working to resolve and respond to complaints in writing with appropriate media days.

C PARTICIPATION MECHANISMS OF EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY IN THE CONSTRUCTION TION OF INSTITUTIONAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM OR N.

This Institutional Assessment system, was consulted with
representatives of teachers, parents and students via email and group
meetings.Suggestions were received by the same means, being organized as approved in this AGREEMENT.

Prior to that the proposal was made ​​known to the members of the
Board and the Academic Council in direct meetings of socialization.

The Academic Council was commissioned to do the analysis of the
proposed disclose and receive suggestions from the bodies mentioned
above.

Finally, a meeting between the Board and the Academic Council of the
Institution, which were representatives of Directives, teachers,
parents, students, alumni and representative business groups was made
​​to approve the system that valid for the current year 2010.

SIGN MEMBERS OF THE MANAGEMENT TIPS

The additions or amendments to this AGREEMENT, can be made ​​at any é little of lis prior study and approval of the Board or n.

Proposal document or Suggestion prepared by JULIO BÁEZ FONSECA - Former Supervisor of the Ministry of National Education and Trainer of Directors and teachers nationwide.