Thanks for the info Attilio.
I'm in subsea engineering so architecture and related rules etc. are not my area but that's a good explanation for us that don't know.
Got to assume you also use fag packet drawings too though?

OK here goes - yes, it's professionally produced however it's a professionally produced outline drawing with no detail. It represents a rough outline of the project but contains no detail such as dimensions, materials, tolerances etc. holy sh*t, it doesn't even have a drawing number or a north indicator on it so is no worth the paper it's (virtually) printed on. The best contractor in the world could not even begin to quote that project with the drawing above. The detail drawings will be with the planners for scrutiny, if they even exist that is, but are not really required when you're just giving people an idea of what is planned.
If it was not professionally produced it would be termed a 'fag packet' drawing

One or two individuals who would happily see DFCSS dissolved and all the current board members executed in fact.
I have no idea how many meetings they have every year; really none of my business.
Apologies if I've got it wrong, I've had 'fallings out' with Ranking Roger on here before and the style of posting and aggression used did not suggest to me at any point that it was a lady posting.

You don't see from the plans that the existing entry / egress to the adjacent site remains in place and that it would be very easy to connect the two sites if not already indicated as such?
I realise you were in finance and not engineering / civils but surely you understand the difference between an outline drawing and a detail drawing? An outline drawing does just what it says on the tin i.e. it outlines high level plans whilst a detail drawing provides the detail - I'd imagine there will be tens or possibly hundreds of detail drawings involved in a project such as this one. What dblair posted up is a very rough outline drawing so I think that spouting about exits being narrower than entries is a bit premature.
Anyway, as I've said countless times I don't think it will ever happen but hope I'm wrong (about it happening not the drawing).

I think you'll find the DFCSS membership represents a fairly typical cross section of the total DFC support. I mean it's not as if you have to be anything special, any particular age group or sex for example, to joint the DFCSS is it? I'd further suggest that the DFCSS membership is more typical of the overall support than either this forum or the other forum you quoted in post number 136.
I hope that other board hasn't tainted your view in any way?
If you're not sure discuss it with your 'wife'.

I know, typing loses any feeling and becomes sterile.
I agree that one member of the DFCSS board in particular should be big enough to realise they are contributing to the problem and stand aside, that might help FPS decide they would like to communicate, but the idea of FPS having to approve society board members doesn't sit well.

Different things -
'PFI' stands for 'Private Finance Initiative' and 'PPP' and 'P3s' are both shorthand for 'Public Private Partnerships'. PFI and PPP both have very similar characteristics, the key difference being the way in which the relevant project is funded.
PFI involves an infrastructure project (eg a hospital, health centre, school, leisure centre, social housing, street lighting, road or prison) being funded by private sector equity and debt funding and then being paid for by the public sector 'customer' through monthly payments over the life of the project. A PPP project would not necessarily require or have such private sector funding.
A good example of a PPP would be public and private sector parties setting up a joint venture company for a regeneration project, with the parties each contributing one or more of land interests, expertise/people and funding but without any set formula or structure for this.