After the Miata (introduced in the United States as a 1990 model) turned out to be an instant hit for Mazda, the marketing wizards at Ford decided to put Mercury badges on the Australian Ford Capri, a four-seat sporty convertible, and beat Mazda at its own game. Sure, the ’91-94 Capri was a Mazda under the skin (it was based on the 323), and it had front-wheel-drive, but so what?The Capri was powered by a Mazda B engine, just like the Miata, and it had a convertible top, but the similarities ended there. While the Miata was a perfect expression of everything that the Alfa Romeo Spider and MBG had tried— but failed— to be in the past, the Capri was just a funny-looking 323 with a soft top.I still see the occasional Capri of this generation on the street, for the same reason I see Geo Metro convertibles on the street: driving with the top down is fun!The 24 Hours of LeMons has several teams campaigning these things (all turbocharged models), and they’re about as quick around a road course as, say, a Ford Ranger pickup or Kia Sephia. In other words, pretty slow.This one only managed to get 120,000 miles, which makes me suspect that it spent a few years parked with something expensive broken.

…my significant other pointed this out to me when we were fuelling her MX-5 earlier this summer and my mind was blown: these arrows had quietly lain there unnoticed, for decades, and in all cars?..skeptical, we rushed home to check the dashboard of my elise, but no arrow…

…so fuel filler markings may be very common, but they’re not universal in modern cars…

Have to remember that for a little while during the proclaimed Malaise Era, the big three had many vehicles that had the fuel door behind the rear license plate. The theory was the car would retain its clean line all around without the interruption of a nasty fuel door ruining it (also could save some money at the factory in stamping). Unfortunately they neglected to put a retaining device on the gas caps, causing many to leave them stranded on top of gas pumps while the driver rolled off piloting a mobile Molotav into freeway traffic.

Yeah, it’s really hard to find the fuel filler door. Even on your own car that you’ve had for a while. A completely unnecessary feature for car dummies. Try looking at the quarter panels, and it should be obvious as to where the gas goes. I can’t believe someone would post on TTAC that this is a good idea. I’d be embarrassed.

I used to rent a dozen cars a year for work. Pulling into a gas station was always a crap shoot. I was the guy with the hose running across the trunk. Who notices the gas door until you need to use it? Love those arrows. Such a simple thing.

In the 70s manufacturers tried to create the illusion of luxury with Brougham. In the 80s and early 90s they tried going for power/speed/sportiness through high numbers and gauges. In each case it was mostly an illusion. But it did help move a few more cars with extra options.

At least some of these things actually have a (tiny,tiny) back seat. In 94(?) I actually test drove one of these with a mercury salesman, as a passanger and friend squeezed in the back. The thing could barely make it up a hill. The salesman was scary offended that I did not immediately want to buy the car. Test drove a new 240sx, a MX-6, a Miata with a repaired front end, and a 91 MR2. Went with the MR2.

The back seat was put there just to qualify as a 4-seater and evade the insurance penalty on 2-seat “sports cars”. I doubt if anyone ever seriously expected it to be used as anything other than an upholstered package tray.

For some reason I don’t recall ever seeing one of these that wasn’t trashed by its owner, many while still fairly new. Not the fault of Ford, but seems to say something about the car’s typical buyer. Don’t know exactly what.

Insurance companies are supposed to be hyper-rational about tying what they charge to what generates claims (unless it violates some law). I have a hard time believing that 2 seat convertible Vs 4 seat convertible is detectable after you normalize for power/weight.

State Farm still asks me “does it have a turbo” every time I add a car to my policy. When I point out that the 80s were a LONG time ago, I get either blank looks or reams of “you’re just too ignorant to understand” insurancespeak nonsense. Hardly “Hyper-rational”.

A friend had an insurance agent tell him an Omni was a sports car because it was a 5-speed.

I had trouble insuring my 16-year-old daughter in her RX7. I pointed out that my new Accord would outrun the RX7 and haul more of her guttersnipe friends. No problem, they’d insure her in that. Okay, I said, how about my ex-cop-car old Dart with its hi-po 360 engine, 727 Torqueflite, and big springs and sway bars and tires, and six-friend carrying capacity? No problem, they’d insure her in that too. Walked away mumbling to myself.

Car insurance outfits and common sense don’t show much overlap on a Venn diagram.

Just bought a ’94 version of this car for my niece. The car is actually pretty tight for what it is, high on the cute factor and gets good mileage. But with a 4 spd auto, it is pretty slow, especially compared to my ’91 Miata 5 spd. Other than body parts, all the mechanical pieces are available and easy to replace. Not a bad choice, especially if someone is looking for a low-priced convertible.

Just a bit, but I think they do that to put common highway/interstate cruising speeds TDC on the gauge. A friend of mine had a Mirage in college with 140mph on the speedo, that was laughable since it would only do about 65 with a tailwind.

“This one only managed to get 120,000 miles, which makes me suspect that it spent a few years parked with something expensive broken.”

Your bone-yard example is equipped with an auto trans, the infamous Mazda designed G4A-EL (Ford called it the 4EAT-G). These transmissions were used in first gen Probes, MX-6, 626 and probably some other things. The G4A-EL almost never made it past 120K miles, which is why you almost never see an auto trans version of these cars on the road anymore (or Probes/MX-6/626 for that matter). Once the cars went over 100K miles, the cost of a trans R&R usually exceeded the car’s FMV.

I saw one of these for the very first time, in the exact same colour as the one pictured, driving on the local toll highway here a couple of weeks ago. At first glance, I had absolutely no idea what it was.

Alfa Spider?
Fiat X1/9 with a body kit?

But, when I got within reading distance of the badge, I was completely speechless. These little Capris are something Ford should really aim for again. Maybe not the drivetrain or other characteristics that doomed them to crusherdom, but the formula is something I would welcome with open arms.

Quite possibly, the worst marketed cars in automotive history. I remember the brochures and signage for this car in a Lincoln/Mercury dealer and it was just God awful. Even as a fresh college grad I was thinking, “whoever approved this stuff should get fired.”

My late wife ‘s friend bought one of these new . She got the base version , not the ” hot ” – actually pretty lukewarm – turbo version . Drove a couple of times with the wife and her friend . Both times in the so- called back seat = only way I could fit was sideways and I’m only 5’ 5″ . One time it was raining and with the top up it was totally claustrophobic . It was a stick but with three of us aboard the car was wheezing to get to speed and as you can see here the interior was pretty cut-rate . At the time the car was often compared to the Miata in the auto magazines and always found wanting .

Well… I’ll be a monkey’s uncle (or something like that) I saw a white Capri, with the top down on the way to work this AM, driving past a Ford dealership no less and literally said out loud (to myself) “boy you don’t see many of these running any more” and here it is on Junkyard Find. Awesome! I’m talking about the article of course and not the car.

This car could have been a success, but Ford management dropped the ball with their cowardice. The project started a decade earlier with a Fiesta XR2 based roadster called the Barchetta. http://www.carstyling.ru/ru/car/1983_ford_barchetta/
The 2-seat Barchetta was enthusiastically received on the auto show circuit in 1983 and seemed just the successor to the recently departed cheap roadsters from England. Then Ford management got involved. They waffled for years about the possible market size. They added back seats to expand the car’s utility, switching to the larger Mazda platform at the same time. Ghia’s attractive styling was toned down to fit in Ford’s showrooms. As plain looking as it was, the Capri still could have sold well except that Ford didn’t approve it for production until they saw how Mazda’s Miata was selling, and that car illuminated all of the Capri’s failings with HID spotlights. Then there is the little issue that even in Australia these cars had a reputation for abysmal build quality.

I rented one of these when I moved to Maui and was waiting for my Accord to ship. Not much to it, but the top did go down, and on Maui that’s about all you need. I would have bet money these didn’t even have a back seat, I’ll bet it won’t hold more than a couple grocery bags.

I kind of admired its, er, unique styling at the time, but these haven’t aged very well.

some friends of the parental units got a red XR-2 model with the Turbo and 5spd manual… I was much younger than and thought it was a pretty fast car, especially when compared with said parents 85 LeBaron GTS Turbo (3spd auto FTW).

Or maybe it was the fact that the XR-2 had a turbo gauge and the GTS Turbo didn’t… LOL

Tough to believe this POS actually spawned a music hit, “Motortown” by Kane Gang. The song hit #36 on Billboard in 1987 as Ford Australia was gearing up to produce the car starting in 1989. The sorely needed jobs promised by production was the song’s (somewhat cynical) theme. Almost a prayer. Maybe they should have prayed for a less leaky roof.

Foret what’s lost and cheer what’s found. Make cheap cars in motortown…

I don t know why you would choose this as a race car. Even for LeMons. Sure it is cheep but why not just go with a Mazda, any Mazda. I had a new 92 MX3 with the V6 that thing screamed. I see some of those have done well.

I bought one new as a commuter in 1991. It gave me no problems in 100,000 miles, and traveled from California to Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Nebraska and Chicago with two people and weeks worth of luggage. It was no Miata, but I didn’t fit in a Miata, and as long as you thought of it as a Mazda 323 version of a Karman Ghia, it was fine. The back seat was good for dogs and luggage; even my 5’1″ mother-in-law had to sit sideways. But it made it over Independence Pass in Colorado and up Pike’s Peak even with the automatic. There aren’t many left. They went down the food chain pretty quick.
Now, it could have been worse; I almost bought a Plymouth Sundance convertible, but the dealer was a dick.

I worked for a Ford-Mercury dealer when the Capri was available. Nice color (Cayman Green, I think) and the body style is tasteful even at this point. But wow, these were dog-slow and body flex created awful pops & creaks in the structure. Yeesh.

This car looks very similar to some older Toyota Celica models from back then I agree that Mazda mechanicals were terrible then…everyone I knew who bought the soap-bar 626’s in the ’90s had terrible problems. MX6’s and the first Probes were crap, too.

It should be reasonably reliable with a stick. Ford/Mazda used this engine in many different vehicles at the time with mostly good results. I had a 10 year old 100K+ mile Mazda MX3 during college with this same motor and never had any issues. It was fairly peppy even with just 105 HP.

MX3 would be a neat Junkyard find especially with the oddball small displacement 1.8 V6. I used to see plenty around but they have gone to the wrecking yard like similar small coupes of the era Pulsar/NX 1600/2000,Geo Storm/Impulse, Toyota Paseo.

Interesting that you got a good pic of the Mercury symbol on the hood. Seem to remember that the Capri was the first car to behold that new Mercury “waterfall” badge instead of the previous Cougar or “Cat” badge that was festooned on all Mercurys prior.

I test drove one of these in 1991. The salesman was a dick and so was his manager. That turned me off from the start.
The car had the smallest trunk I ever saw and was cramped inside. It reminded me of a TR7 and not in a good way. The handling was unresponsive and the car was dead slow.

During this period, a version of the Ford Mustang was sold through Lincoln/Mercury dealers as the Mercury Capri, giving Mercury a pony car for the first time since the Mercury Cougar was upsized in 1974 to complement the Ford Thunderbird. The Capri was built on the Ford Fox platform, which was used for the Mustang from 1979 to 1993 with a design change in 1994. It was the only Mercury Capri generation with a V8 engine.

REALLY, THE TRUTH THAT YOU CAN’T READ TO THE BOTTOM OF A WIKIPEDIA ENTRY BEFORE POSTING ON A WEB FORUM AND MAKING AN ASS OF YOURSELF…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_Capri

From the SAME article:

Third Generation (1991–1994)

Ford Australia produced a Mazda Miata rival named the Ford Capri from 1989, which ironically, was based around many Mazda 323 mechanics. Therefore, it is Front Wheel Drive as opposed to the Mazda Miata’s Rear Wheel Drive. From the 1991 model year, this car was sold in North America as the Mercury Capri. The car was sold until the 1994 model year with minimal changes (1994 models did get a minor cosmetic update that included new front and rear bumpers as well as taillights).