Followers

Monday, August 03, 2015

Preaching Wine, Drinking Water: Kenya's Drunken Myths

Does Kenya have an alcoholism problem? Going by media
reports, one would be forgiven for believing that the country is caught in the
throes of drinking crisis fuelled by the availability of cheap, illicit alcohol.
Almost daily we are treated to dire warnings of an entire generation being lost
to booze. The situation, particularly in the former Central Province is said to
be so bad that President Uhuru Kenyatta issued directives to Members of
Parliament and the citizenry “to move from door to door closing all outlets
selling the illicit drinks.”

The result has been widespread destruction and looting of
business premises by rampaging mobs under the guise of implementing the
directive. And though the President has attempted to walk back his fierce talk
by urging that property is respected, the damage has already been done. And
impunity for those involved is the order of the day, with at least one MP -the
infamous Moses Kuria, who else?- saying on national television that Mr Kenyatta’s
directive had provided “the leeway to go out there and use our own formula,”
adding he had no regrets to make for the
razing down of at least two factories in his constituency.

The dubious legality of the President’s actions aside, Kenyans appear to be preaching wine and drinking water. There
is little publicly accessible data to support the idea of a widespread crisis of
intoxication among the country's young men. According to the WHO’s Global Status Report
on Alcohol and Health 2014 which cites data from 2010, nearly 8 in 10 Kenyans
aged 15 and above had not had a drink in the previous 12 months. This figure
includes the half of all similarly aged males who were lifetime abstainers and
another sixth who appear to have given it up. In all, nearly seven in ten males and
nine in ten females over 15 were teetotal.

In fact, Kenya would be the East Africa Community’s
designated driver, given that between 40% and 45% of Tanzanians, Rwandans, Burundians
and Ugandans are boozers.

Among those Kenyans who partook, only 7.4 percent had taken more
than 60 grams or more of pure alcohol (roughly the equivalent of three bottles
of Tusker) on at least one occasion in the previous 30 days. These figures do
not show young Kenyans drinking themselves
into an early grave. If anything, since the 70s, per capita alcohol consumption has actually halved.

Also in 2010, the country’s National Authority for Campaign against
Alcohol and Drug Abuse conducted a study of alcohol consumption in the central
region. It found that more than two-thirds of those surveyed were lifetime
abstainers. The prevalence rate measured by use in the past 30 days, was higher
than the national average, but not by much (about 5 percent). However, compared
to 2007, the prevalence rate among men aged 15-64 had shot up by 11.5 percent.
Clearly, more men had taken to drinking. However, when broken down into the
several districts, the data revealed that consumption in some was much higher
than in others, indicating localized problems, especially in Muranga.

Sure there are localized pockets of crapulence in the
country and the folks there require help. However, it does not seem accurate to assert
a generalized or nationwide epidemic of alcoholism. Neithwr is it illegal to
be an alcoholic. We should not treat such people, and the legitimate
enterprises that are licensed to sell booze, as if they were criminals.

Illicit brew presents an entirely different problem. It is
important that we define what is illicit. It certainly does not appear that the
trade in the much maligned second-generation alcohol is actually illegal. When
the Kenya Bureau of Standards suspended 385 brands, it also acknowledged that
they were legal, with its Managing Director saying the concern was with
counterfeiters.

Undoubtedly, adulterated and bootleg hooch has caused many
deaths over the years. But even here, things are not as straightforward as they seem. Chang’aa, a major target of the current crackdown. But
across the country, it takes many forms and is not always illegal or dangerous.
In a recent article in the Star, John Githongo avers that chang’aa brewed in a
western Kenya pot is much safer and of much better quality than its central
Kenya counterpart. It is also consumed much more widely consumed with little of
the ill-effects. It also bears reminding that though most chang’aa is made
illegally, its production and sale can be a legitimate enterprise. The 2010 Alcoholic
Drinks Control Act repealed the Chang’aa Prohibition Act, which made it illegal
to produce or consume traditional liquors.

The fact that all chang’a, along with the nebulous category
of second generation booze, appears to be treated as if it were dangerous and illicit
bespeaks both of the confusion at the heart of the current clampdown, which is compounding, not solving, the problem. Simply put, the government must recognize
that Kenya does not have a drinking problem. It has a policy and regulation
problem. It is the policy regime that creates perverse incentives for the
adulteration of drinks, that is killing many. This will only be cured by an
enlightened, rational, evidence-based approach that prioritizes, not prohibition,
but affordable, legal and safe booze for the poor. In short, the best way to
deal with Kenya’s alcohol problem is for the government to sober up.

This is an abridged version of an article appearing in the August issue
of The Platform magazine