1) As pourez see these surveys were conducted in a Controle Technique Automobile center. This reflects the practical difficulties encountered during this project I had to actually move (with my own) the test bench to perform these measurements (over a weekend). Despite what you think pourait, an engineering school is not necessarily well equipped!

2) These measures are not those that have been exploited in the report. Indeed, a few weeks after we managed to get a gas analyzer 4 ENSAIS. This explains the differences in numbers you will be found. On these surveys, power could not be measured precisely. I simply was preparing an electric resistive load variable 0 1500 to W and a frequency meter for measuring the speed of rotation. The name "Full power" corresponds to W 1500 4000 not (rated power of the group).

3) These measures are from ... more June 2001 3 years have passed and strictly no serious proposal for R & D was proposed to me not! When I contacted the ADEME I had no constructive answer! A Renault BE engineer was simply contemptuous with the system and myself to the limit insults.

4) For each statement, I would make brief comments, yours are welcome in the reactions below. For more details you will need read my report.

6) It is regrettable not to have the original configuration 100% in pollution figures. This could be done for practical reasons.

7) These surveys are more qualitative than quantitative. In general the mass analysis reduced to the energy produced would be much more interesting ... .But this requires industrial means much greater than I had (and have) not ...

8) From a purely scientific point of view it is essential to bear in mind the following when 3 reading these statements:

a) A large part of the environmental remediation undoubtedly comes from the almost perfect gasification mixture. Just before combustion, we are no longer in the presence of fog but a gas. Nevertheless rodless tests tend to prove anything else happens: the stem promotes heating of gas contributes to a better gasification.

b) The solution of the bubbler used at the time is not the most sense because it is only the most volatile parts of the gasoline that evaporate and thus burning. Who said volatiles said necessarily better combustion and pollution control. Furthermore it impoverishes and gasoline (up to reduce its PCI by 2).

c) According to the internal technology of the analyzer it is possible (but not certain) that the results displayed by either éronés: - The fact that no more fuel burned- The presence of an excess of water vapor in the exhaust gas.I think the latter remark applies particularly to the carbon footprint.

Despite these 3 point, the results are still quite amazing especially at the effect of water on the clean (we arrive at 000 ppm) and the exhaust gases are cleaner than the air in the garage this pollutant.

2) Records

For each measurement, a scan of the statement of the abatement equipment has been made, it all have this form:

Click on the title of each measure to see the records.

I) Pollution carburetor operation and reactor as a muffler (see the complete study for details)

Our analysis: this reflects a very poor combustion (even for a small petrol engine "not cleared" in relation to automobile engines). This is probably due to the "pot-reactor" which is not "granted" to the engine and slight changes on admission. Additionally the completely original pot is the end of the exhaust channel. A suppression exhaust is certain. The modification of the exhaust system does not support combustion!

II) Pollution operation "Pantone" in various configurations (see the complete study for details)

Back in ...

Back in ...

The econology?

Econology is the contraction of economy (s) and ecology, this neologism was invented by Christophe Martz. Christophe is engineer ENSAIS M2001. The site is online since 2003 to democratize the concept of econology, this for the benefit of current and future generations ...