Even the one who coerced you into sex with a threat of killing herself with an overdose?

Being religious I think that's beautiful. But yep! Reason being: from being in this industry, it's better, easier, more efficient to move on then to deal with one person at a time, and learn from your mistakes. Life is way too short. I'm not saying you should come strictly from trial and error either.

Don't constrain or touch a chick without their consent or I will find you.

Um, I've had to pin womens arms to avoid being beaten. I once had to use a modified hip throw to pivot one out of the way in as gentle a manner as possible (to make good my escape!).

These "ladies" were on the attack. You think what I did was with their explicit, informed and pre-established consent? Hell no! They was trying to damage the ol' Machette in a most un lady like manner!

Now I'm a big proponent of the "don't hurt women" thing. Thus being as gentle as possible and putting extra effort out to bruise nothing more than ego. But in a conflict, "permission" goes right out the window.

We going to fight now or something? Come and get me pretty boy! ;p

On the real though, move out of southern california. It's where the wackadoodles run free and wild. Hard as hell to find a well adjusted woman in that fantasy land.

Pretty boy? Thank you.
But. No.
If I'm just stating what I used to to do. However if you severely beat your wife/gf please post so I can call the authorities and visit you in the process. ;) "pretty boy". If this site condones such a thing.....sam browning get ready to get your moneis worth. ;)

Had I the heavens' embroidered cloths,
Enwrought with golden and silver light,
The blue and the dim and the dark cloths
Of night and light and the half-light,
I would spread the cloths under your feet:
But I, being poor, have only my dreams;
I have spread my dreams under your feet;
Tread softly because you tread on my dream.

I fail to see how mace-ing someone isn't considered in the realm of assault, Smackjack. Mace is a weapon of a type of pain compliance, is it not? Correct me if I am wrong, but it is banned in Australia because it can be used as a weapon.

With daddy being a criminal lawyer, your bountiful dollars which would allow barristers of the highest quality and repeated threats to call the police to have the woman arrested from your mansion, I would imagine you would intimidate anyone with threats of a legal nature. This is not how the rest of the world lives, Fabio.

I was an indentured wage slave with no disposable income due to having set up a house with what turned out to be a monster. She concocted a story of violence that was based loosely on events that occurred on the night I decided to leave her, omitting the violence she perpetrated, the police accepted without question her version of events, had me charged with assault, she changed the locks on my house, had a court order preventing me from collecting my things and finally showed up in court to introduce a whole new scenario of lies to the court. She had zero fear of being charged with perjury due to DV laws and thus happily attempted to manipulate the court by making me out to be some sort of evil violent monster who had martial arts experience.

The charges were dismissed two weeks ago, but not after a long period of time.

I wonder what would have happened if I had mace-d her when she first threw a bottle at me and called the cops?

"Hi, police? Yes, my fiancee just threw a bottle at me so I sprayed her with a chemical agent that induces a severe pain response, can you please come and take her away please?"