Il giorno lun, 28-02-2005 alle 08:26 -0800, Donovan Preston ha scritto:
> Using the function name as the identifier was an experiment which I
> think was a bad idea. I'll roll that code back out.
>> Before I started using the function name, I used an arbitrary
> identifier which was opaque and made debugging difficult. With the
> addition of the programmer-supplied identifier, debugging can be made
> easier by providing it, and an opaque identifier can be used if none is
> provided.
I completely agree. Sorry for the noise but I stopped following the HEAD
for some weeks so I somehow lost the "story" of the changes.
Another little problem: isn't liveevil.js missing an eval() call on the
handler extra arguments?
--
Federico Di Gregorio http://people.initd.org/fog
Debian GNU/Linux Developer fog at debian.org
INIT.D Developer fog at initd.org
stiamo parlando di lesbiche. secondo te ce ne frega qualcosa? -- <Md>