.... it may be unhistoric

.... to you, but does that mean it is actually unhistoric or does that mean something else?

A paper to be published in Ethics, Policy & Environment argues that serious consideration should be given to mass drugging the population to make them more environmentally conscious while also proposing that babies should be genetically engineered to be smaller in order to reduce their carbon footprints.

In an interview with The Atlantic the lead author of the paper, New York University bioethics professor S. Matthew Liao, argues that humans need to be be subjected to biomedical modifications in order to help combat climate change.

Followed to their logical conclusion, Liaos proposals outstrip anything Aldous Huxley wrote about in Brave New World, a 1932 dystopian novel about a future scientific dictatorship that seeks to drug, genetically manipulate, and medically induce humanity into complete slavish subservience.

Luckily for us we all know it's all utter bollocks, since it's really the decline in seafaring pirates that is the real cause.....

Next : it was really global warming that caused the Titanic to go down.

rejected and denied by many, accepted and embraced by few : falsifiability
- it is not what we (think we) know that matters, it is what we can show true that does
as the maxim demands; truth is demonstrably fact and fact is demonstrably true
everything else ... mere BS -