Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1. Was the Court correct in denying John Mueller's motion for indemnity?
2. Did the trial court abuse its discretion under the facts in this case in amending Mueller's Cross-Claim from a claim for indemnity to a claim for breach of contract after the trial without notice to the parties.
3. Did the Court err in finding sufficient evidence to support a conclusion that Zabolotnys breached their contract with Mueller.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
1. Did the trial court abuse its discretion when it amended the motion for indemnification for the Appellee on a breach of contract theory?
2. Did the trial court have sufficient evidence to support its finding that Appellants breached their contract with the Appellee?