Maslow’s Hierarchy of Need: Psychology Myth Busting #1

If I see another slide of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs in a Creative Director’s pitch deck I might explode. It’s become a bit of a cliche in the agency world.

Malsow’s model purports to show the motivations of us humans. The most basic at the bottom of the pyramid. Once these needs are met we are motivated by the next need up in the pyramid all the way to the top.

It’s ubiquity isn’t the problem, the problem is there is little theoretical basis (empirical evidence) for for the model.

Maslow put it together just because it sort of felt right. It does, and this is the big criticism, if you are a man in the western world.

A large number of cross-sectional studies showed no clear evidence for Maslow’s deprivation / domination proposition except with regard to self-actualization. Longitudinal studies testing Maslow’s gratification / activation proposition showed no support, and the limited support received from cross-sectional studies is questionable due to numerous measurement problems.

That study, conducted in the western world, found no evidence for the sub parts of the model but did for self actualisation. We have to turn to work by Hofstede to help us understand why that part of the model is not universal.

Self-actualisation, the idea of people becoming the best they can be is a very individualistic idea. Asian cultures are about the community and family that is collectivist in focus. Placing this very individual goal at the top highlights Maslow’s background, a man living in the individualistic USA.