Promoting prostitution (knowingly supervised or managed or controlled the activities of a prostitute in engaging in sexual activity for hire)

FIRST CHARGE US/STATE CODE CITATION:

Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2907.22(A)(2).

FIRST CHARGE VERDICT/PLEA:

Guilty

FIRST CHARGE SENTENCE:

SECOND CHARGE:

SECOND CHARGE US/STATE CODE CITATION:

SECOND CHARGE VERDICT/PLEA:

SECOND CHARGE SENTENCE:

THIRD CHARGE:

THIRD CHARGE US/STATE CODE CITATION:

THIRD CHARGE VERDICT/PLEA:

THIRD CHARGE SENTENCE:

FOURTH CHARGE:

FOURTH CHARGE US/STATE CODE CITATION:

FOURTH CHARGE VERDICT/PLEA:

FOURTH CHARGE SENTENCE:

FIFTH CHARGE:

FIFTH CHARGE US/STATE CODE CITATION:

FIFTH CHARGE VERDICT/PLEA:

FIFTH CHARGE SENTENCE:

CORE TERMS:

SENTENCING OPINION CITATION:

LENGTH OF GREATEST SENTENCE:

RESTITUTION REQUIRED:

FINE IMPOSED:

FORFEITURE IMPOSED:

FIRST CLAIM:

FIRST CLAIM US/STATE CODE CITATION:

FIRST CLAIM RESULT:

DAMAGES AWARDED FOR FIRST CLAIM:

SECOND CLAIM:

SECOND CLAIM US/STATE CODE CITATION:

SECOND CLAIM RESULT:

DAMAGES AWARDED FOR SECOND CLAIM:

THIRD CLAIM:

THIRD CLAIM US/STATE CODE CITATION:

THIRD CLAIM RESULT:

DAMAGES AWARDED FOR THIRD CLAIM:

FOURTH CLAIM:

FOURTH CLAIM US/STATE CODE CITATION:

FOURTH CLAIM RESULT:

DAMAGES AWARDED FOR FOURTH CLAIM:

FIFTH CLAIM:

FIFTH CLAIM US/STATE CODE CITATION:

FIFTH CLAIM RESULT:

DAMAGES AWARDED FOR FIFTH CLAIM:

SIXTH CLAIM:

SIXTH CLAIM US/STATE CODE CITATION:

SIXTH CLAIM RESULT:

DAMAGES AWARDED FOR SIXTH CLAIM:

TOTAL AWARD:

APPEAL:

Yes

EXPLANATION OF APPEAL:

Appealed Judgment

APPELLATE OPINION CITATION:

State v. Jackson, 1980 Ohio App. LEXIS 10227

HOLDING OF APPEALS COURT:

Affirm

APPEAL STILL PENDING?:

No

SUMMARY:

Defendant met an undercover police officer, Cornett, who was cruising around a block that was known for prostitution. Defendant got into Cornett's car, directed him to a nearby bar, and went inside. He returned a few minutes later with a woman named Daviene Bryant. Defendant and Bryant agreed to split the $40 Cornett would pay.

Cornett and Bryant went to a hotel room where Bryant was arrested, after "sexual contact." Defendant was also arrested.

Jackson argued that there was insufficient evidence to prove that he was a supervisor or manager of the prostitute he was caught bringing to a motel room for hire. The appellate court disagreed, believing the statutory language prohibited just this type of conduct: "[Jackson] was engaged in more than pandering, because he initiated the transaction and then produced the woman and the room. In broad terms, he was trafficking in human flesh, the activity prohibited by the statute."