Upayavira wrote on Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 13:42:04 +0100:
> This is something I recall from clarifications by Roy some while back -
> made a lot of sense to me. I'm not aware of it being documented
> anywhere, nor am I aware of it having been collectively agreed. If we
> can work out where,
www.apache.org/legal/resolved , after legal@ consensus?
> I'd be happy to write it up.
>
Cheers
Daniel
> Upayavira
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012, at 01:35 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Upayavira wrote on Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 13:26:00 +0100:
> > > Note, podlings are free to check in IP that is dubious from a *policy*
> > > perspective (i.e. incompatible with Apache License), but should not, as
> > > I see it, check in anything that is dubious from a *legal* one (i.e. it
> > > is not and should not be public, or we don't have *any* rights to
> > > distribute). While we may not consider putting stuff into SVN as
> > > publishing or distributing, others might not agree with that.
> > >
> >
> > Is this info on www.a.o/legal/ somewhere? If not, should it?
> >
> > > I've not heard of anyone demanding us to remove something from SVN
> > > entirely, and I believe that would be a very painful exercise. Best is
> > > to make sure it is only license compatibility issues that exist before
> > > code is checked in.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org