Friday, 30 April 2010

Here is a warning for South Africa - if you act as Zimbabwe has done and we are in power, then make no mistake we will intervene to protect our citizens, unlike the gutless bastards in the Tories and Labour Party who have left our people to suffer in Zimbabwe.

South Africa: Gunning for White Farmers - President Zuma tries to lie about his Mugabe-like moves on the Land: He says: Constitution Not Under ThreatDate Posted: Thursday 29-Apr-2010

[Hidden inside this article is something really important.

The DA and the ID say that the ANC is intending violating the constitution.

But hidden away in all this is Zuma's statement that the "willing buyer, willing seller" model of land redistribution is to be scrapped.

It seems that Zuma is now trying to CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION TO SEIZE THE LAND FROM THE FARMERS WHETHER THEY WANT TO SELL OR NOT.

You will recall, for years I was talking about how in Zimbabwe they kept changing the rules and progressively cheating the white farmers more and more. They paid them LESS, they paid them on a deferred basis. They pretended to pay them with Govt bonds and so forth. On and on, then this trick, then that. Eventually most of those farmers worked away from their life's work with: NOTHING.

The DA and the ID are far too important and responsible as political parties to run around saying the constitution is threatened when its not. The ANC has been trying several times over the last few years to move in and destroy this part of the constitution. They want to seize land for the blacks.

Of course, 90% of the land they give to the blacks, even when it contains massive, sophisticated, state-of-the-art farms, still FLOPS. But... it seems the black madness, like in Zimbabwe is coming.

BY HOOK OR BY CROOK, THE ANC WILL GO AFTER THE LAND. THE ANC IS PREPARING TO DO WHAT MUGABE DID. CLEARLY THE ANC'S FUTURE IS ON THE LINE AND THE AIM NOW IS TO START STEALING FROM WHITES IN ORDER TO RETAIN THEIR VOTES.

Yep... South Africa will become another Zimbabwe. Its so close now. Jan]

By Chris Bathembu

Johannesburg - President Jacob Zuma has moved to allay fears that the country's constitution is under threat, saying the executive remained committed to the supremacy of the document.

Speaking at a Black Management Forum (BMF) constitutional symposium on Thursday, Zuma said while government welcomed comments on the country's constitutional development, people should not use the constitution "for cheap politicking and to gain cheap political points".

In a clear reference to a recent march to the constitutional court by leaders of the Democratic Alliance and Independent Democrats over what they called a threat to the constitution, Zuma said the country's constitution will remain protected. He described the actions of the two political parties on Freedom Day as "mischievous".

"As the executive, we've always underlined our respect for the independence of the judiciary and our respect for the constitution. We therefore take a view that we should not be rigid in our definition of the separation of powers," said Zuma.

He said the ruling African National Congress was the first to defend the constitution when it drafted the Freedom Chatter in the late 50s. "We were the first to defend it and we will be the last to defend it," he said to loud applause.

South Africa's constitution, he said, remained one of the best in the world because of the amount of time spent in drafting in it. "Ours is also a unique constitution because it entrenches key socio-economic rights".

Zuma went on to say that one of the state's constitutional obligations is to ensure that land is linked to the development of people's lives as enshrined in the Bill of Rights. "That is why we have decided as government that, in order to move forward with land redistribution and restitution certain changes needed to be made in the willing buyer willing seller model," he said.

Government is investigating cheaper ways of ensuring that the issue of land was resolved as swiftly as possible within the boundaries of the constitution.

Zuma undertook that the practice of land invasion, witnessed in some African countries, would never take place in South Africa saying the country had law abiding citizens.

An honorary member of the BMF, Zuma called on those attending the meeting to have a frank and constructive debate on the constitution, saying he was looking forward to receiving a report on the debate.

He urged them to expose the practice of fronting that often accompanies Black Economic Empowerment transactions.

Zuma, who also acknowledged that BEE and employment equity were still not being applied fully, said government viewed the unintended consequence of fronting as a challenge and it needed to be rooted out.

"We are aware that the majority of our black people still lack behind in terms of ownership of resources...and BEE remains an integral part to address that".

Earlier, BMF President Jimmy Manyi said his organisation will not stop in its work "until we have real black business in this country".

"We want to see black mangers and we want to swell the ranks of government and we are unapologetic about it," said Manyi who is also the Labour Department's Director General.

Zuma promised that government will use the BEE Advisory Council, launched earlier this year, to identify any bottle necks that may still exist in the transformation of the country's economy.

BRITAIN appears to be evolving into the first modern soft totalitarian state. As a sometime teacher of political science and international law, I do not use the term totalitarian loosely.

There are no concentration camps or gulags but there are thought police with unprecedented powers to dictate ways of thinking and sniff out heresy, and there can be harsh punishments for dissent.

Nikolai Bukharin claimed one of the Bolshevik Revolution's principal tasks was "to alter people's actual psychology". Britain is not Bolshevik, but a campaign to alter people's psychology and create a new Homo britannicus is under way without even a fig leaf of disguise.

The Government is pushing ahead with legislation that will criminalise politically incorrect jokes, with a maximum punishment of up to seven years' prison. The House of Lords tried to insert a free-speech amendment, but Justice Secretary Jack Straw knocked it out. It was Straw who previously called for a redefinition of Englishness and suggested the "global baggage of empire" was linked to soccer violence by "racist and xenophobic white males". He claimed the English "propensity for violence" was used to subjugate Ireland, Scotland and Wales, and that the English as a race were "potentially very aggressive".

Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.

End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.

In the past 10 years I have collected reports of many instances of draconian punishments, including the arrest and criminal prosecution of children, for thought-crimes and offences against political correctness.

Countryside Restoration Trust chairman and columnist Robin Page said at a rally against the Government's anti-hunting laws in Gloucestershire in 2002: "If you are a black vegetarian Muslim asylum-seeking one-legged lesbian lorry driver, I want the same rights as you." Page was arrested, and after four months he received a letter saying no charges would be pressed, but that: "If further evidence comes to our attention whereby your involvement is implicated, we will seek to initiate proceedings." It took him five years to clear his name.

Page was at least an adult. In September 2006, a 14-year-old schoolgirl, Codie Stott, asked a teacher if she could sit with another group to do a science project as all the girls with her spoke only Urdu. The teacher's first response, according to Stott, was to scream at her: "It's racist, you're going to get done by the police!" Upset and terrified, the schoolgirl went outside to calm down. The teacher called the police and a few days later, presumably after officialdom had thought the matter over, she was arrested and taken to a police station, where she was fingerprinted and photographed. According to her mother, she was placed in a bare cell for 3 1/2 hours. She was questioned on suspicion of committing a racial public order offence and then released without charge. The school was said to be investigating what further action to take, not against the teacher, but against Stott. Headmaster Anthony Edkins reportedly said: "An allegation of a serious nature was made concerning a racially motivated remark. We aim to ensure a caring and tolerant attitude towards pupils of all ethnic backgrounds and will not stand for racism in any form."

A 10-year-old child was arrested and brought before a judge, for having allegedly called an 11-year-old boya "Paki" and "bin Laden" during a playground argument at a primary school (the other boy had called him a skunk and a Teletubby). When it reached the court the case had cost taxpayers pound stg. 25,000. The accused was so distressed that he had stopped attending school. The judge, Jonathan Finestein, said: "Have we really got to the stage where we are prosecuting 10-year-old boys because of political correctness? There are major crimes out there and the police don't bother to prosecute. This is nonsense."

Finestein was fiercely attacked by teaching union leaders, as in those witch-hunt trials where any who spoke in defence of an accused or pointed to defects in the prosecution were immediately targeted as witches and candidates for burning.

Hate-crime police investigated Basil Brush, a puppet fox on children's television, who had made a joke about Gypsies. The BBC confessed that Brush had behaved inappropriately and assured police that the episode would be banned.

A bishop was warned by the police for not having done enough to "celebrate diversity", the enforcing of which is now apparently a police function. A Christian home for retired clergy and religious workers lost a grant because it would not reveal to official snoopers how many of the residents were homosexual. That they had never been asked was taken as evidence of homophobia.

Muslim parents who objected to young children being given books advocating same-sex marriage and adoption at one school last year had their wishes respected and the offending material withdrawn. This year, Muslim and Christian parents at another school objecting to the same material have not only had their objections ignored but have been threatened with prosecution if they withdraw their children.

There have been innumerable cases in recent months of people in schools, hospitals and other institutions losing their jobs because of various religious scruples, often, as in the East Germany of yore, not shouted fanatically from the rooftops but betrayed in private conversations and reported to authorities. The crime of one nurse was to offer to pray for a patient, who did not complain but merely mentioned the matter to another nurse. A primary school receptionist, Jennie Cain, whose five-year-old daughter was told off for talking about Jesus in class, faces the sack for seeking support from her church. A private email from her to other members of the church asking for prayers fell into the hands of school authorities.

Permissiveness as well as draconianism can be deployed to destroy socially accepted norms and values. The Royal Navy, for instance, has installed a satanist chapel in a warship to accommodate the proclivities of a satanist crew member. "What would Nelson have said?" is a British newspaper cliche about navy scandals, but in this case seems a legitimate question. Satanist paraphernalia is also supplied to prison inmates who need it.

This campaign seems to come from unelected or quasi-governmental bodies controlling various institutions, which are more or less unanswerable to electors, more than it does directly from the Government, although the Government helps drive it and condones it in a fudged and deniable manner.

Any one of these incidents might be dismissed as an aberration, but taken together - and I have only mentioned a tiny sample; more are reported almost every day - they add up to a pretty clear picture.

Hal G. P. Colebatch's Blair's Britain was chosen as a book of the year by The Spectator in 1999.

A vigilante is celebrating after completing a database of 6,000 convicted sex offenders and paedophiles across every county in Britain and posting their names and photographs on Facebook.

Chris Wittwer said he has created the largest photographic gallery 'in the world' after spending 'every waking hour' gathering police mugshots of registered sex offenders.

Nearly 18,000 people have joined his Facebook groups since the 34-year-old started compiling the huge online bank two years ago.

A total of 44 groups on the social networking site feature 5,930 names and photographs of sex criminals who have been convicted in Britain's courts.

Mr Wittwer, from Exeter, who works as a warehouse operator said today: 'I feel really proud.

'It's quite an achievement and if it helps people spot sex offenders living in their area, who are a known risk to children, then I've done a good thing.

'It's a really big project - way bigger than anything before like the other site RatBook.

'But it's not a question of being a hate mob, it's the simple fact that on the national sex offenders register you can access some information but you can't see the faces of those who commit the crimes.

'With my groups you can see the picture of the offender, their name, the date of their offence and where they were resident at the time.

'Because of the repeat nature of many child sex offences it is an invaluable tool for parents who want to keep a watching eye over their kids.'

Mr Wittwer had his first group closed down by police when he first started the venture two years ago for the county of Devon.

But the online portals were started back up again because the campaigner was able to show he was not breaking any laws by presenting information already in the public domain.

He has stuck religiously to only putting up details of convicted sex offenders by checking local newspapers and court records.Nearly 18,000 people have joined his Facebook groups since the 34-year-old started compiling the huge online bank two years ago

Nearly 18,000 people have joined his Facebook groups since the 34-year-old started compiling the huge online bank two years ago

He then cross-references the name of a sex criminal against the national sex offenders register before giving himself the green light to put up the name.

He said: 'I definitely cross all the t's and dot the i's - nothing is left to chance.

'I use press releases from the police as well as local paper cuttings and newspapers' own archives.

'No hearsay or unconfirmed allegations go on the site. That's how I've been able to continue legally.

'The list is growing all the time - I cover 62 counties in all across England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland so I'm constantly adding new names.'

Mr Wittwer says he gets 40 messages every day from people praising his work on the social networking site - with many victims turning to him for support.

He said: 'It's very difficult when you get a victim asking for your help because I'm not a qualified counsellor.

'All I can do is offer them a bit of advice and tell them where to turn to.'

But he said he has also come in for some hostility from actual sex offenders who have tracked him down and tried to attack him for what he has done.

He said: 'On a couple of occasions I have had paedophiles try and hunt me down. I guess it's an occupational hazard.

'They don't want their names out there. But fortunately it hasn't come to anything.'

Mr Wittwer said he started his 'mission' after working as a pub barman a few years ago where he found out about a regular who had been molesting a child.

He said: 'It created shockwaves and it sickened me. I just wanted to do something about it. This is my way of helping I suppose.'

He added proudly that his list actually helped track down one sex offender who had been spotted working in a local sweet shop - opposite a primary school.

He said: 'This particular person was on the sex offenders register but had failed to keep police informed of his movements.

'Thanks to my site he was recognised and when police caught up with him they found he had been abusing again. He went back to jail.

He added: 'I'm really pleased I've managed to cover the whole UK now. I've just finished doing the last remaining places in Scotland last week but it will be an ongoing job to keep it up to date.'

The online groups have been a massive hit with users as the site states on its opening page: 'On this site we aim to expose the paedophiles, perverts and child abuse animals that infest our society today.

'Is it just and right what I am doing? I don't care! If I can help to save one child from these crimes then it has all been worth it.'

Group members have called on Mr Wittwer to release people's addresses and some have even suggested torturing paedophiles.

But Facebook confirmed that he has done nothing wrong in the eyes of the social networking site, which has millions of users across the country.

A spokesman said: 'We want Facebook to be a place where people can openly discuss issues and express their views, while respecting the rights and feeling of others.

'It is within the terms of the site for users to express their views about a public figure, which includes views about someone who has been convicted of a crime and details related to the crime that are freely available in the media.'

The spokesman added: 'However, bullying and harassment of a private individual is against the terms of use of the site and any content or users found to be in violation will be removed.

'As a community, Facebook is highly self-regulating, and we encourage users to report questionable or offensive content.

'Facebook takes all complaints by users seriously and we have a dedicated team investigating these complaints and comments by users.'

A Kent Police spokesperson said: 'Any information taken from the internet and sites such as Facebook should be treated with caution as its authenticity cannot be confirmed.

'Part of Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) includes assessing risk to members of the public and where they should be told about offenders in their community, we tell them.

'We encourage anyone with concerns about offenders to report the information to the police or through Crimestoppers.

'By providing the police and our partners with information, members of the public can help to protect themselves and others.'

The National Union of Journalists (NUJ) has this week rejected a membership application because it came from a member of the British National Party.

The application had been refused because of the individual's work as a BNP organiser, the union confirmed to Journalism.co.uk. The individual's links with the party were clearly stated as part of the application.

"His actions aren't compatible with membership of the NUJ," a spokesman said, adding that other unions would adhere to similar rules. A BNP member entering the union would contradict with the NUJ's Code of Conduct, which all journalists joining the union must sign, the spokesman suggested. Section 10 of the code says : "A journalist (…) produces no material likely to lead to hatred or discrimination on the grounds of a person's age, gender, race, colour, creed, legal status, disability, marital status, or sexual orientation."

At an event promoting the cross-media EXPOSE the BNP campaign, deputy general secretary of the union Michelle Stanistreet called on the British Media to exact more scrutiny of the BNP and its policies.

"Journalism comes with a responsibility. We have to face the reality of what happens when we don't do our job properly. We are encouraging our members to scrutinise people from across the political parties. But at the minute the BNP just isn't being scrutinised properly," she said.

"We need people to know the difference between what these people are saying on TV and what they actually stand for. This needs to be exposed through the media."

The NUJ criticised BBC's decision to put Nick Griffin on Question Time in October: "The union argues that the format of the show does not allow the BNP’s dishonest propaganda to be properly challenged." In February the union launched a guide to journalists reporting the BNP ahead of the general election.

A BNP spokesperson said the decision by the union was "hardly surprising". "The NUJ bosses wouldn't want anyone blowing the whistle on the extent of their doctoring of news reports concerning the British National Party," the spokesperson said.

The CPS is nothing more than the politically correct prosecution wing of the Labour Party, and this decision not to prosecute is symptomatic of a corrupt, evil, bigoted public institution hijacked by leftist extremists.

Muslim daubs war memorial with 'Islam will dominate the world' - but walks free after CPS says he was NOT racially motivated

By Daily Mail ReporterLast updated at 3:39 PM on 30th April 2010

* Comments (405) * Add to My Stories

A British Muslim has shown 'no remorse' after desecrating a town's war memorial with extremist Islamic slogans, a court has heard.

But the Crown Prosecution Service has decided that graffiti proclaiming future world domination for Islam, glorifying Osama Bin Laden and calling for the assassination of the British Prime Minister, 'was not religiously or racially motivated'.

Tohseef Shah, 21, admitted a charge of criminal damage to the memorial, outside Burton College in Burton on Trent, when he appeared at Burton Magistrates Court.graffiti

Islamic message: Tohseef Shah's graffiti 'Islam will dominate the world' was not religiously motivated, according to the Crown Prosecution Service

Shah admitted spraying the words 'Islam will dominate the world - Osama is on his way' and 'Kill Gordon Brown' on the plinth of the East Staffordshire Borough Council-owned memorial, on December 10 last year.

More...

* Judge rules Christians have NO special rights as he throws out case of sex therapist who refused to work with gay couples * Denmark's KFC website targeted by Islamist hackers * Belgium bans burkas: Women who refuse to show faces to be jailed

He was given a two-year conditional discharge and was ordered to pay £500 compensation to the council, plus £85 costs.

Prosecutor Andrew Bodger said information about Shah and photographs of the graffiti were sent to CPS headquarters in London, for a review by senior lawyers.graffiti

Unrepentant: the court heard that Mr Shah had shown 'no remorse'

They found there was insufficient evidence that the criminal act was racially or religiously motivated - which could have led to a more serious charges and a harsher sentence.

The graffiti was discovered by a council street cleaning manager, who reported the incident and photographed the damage.

The pictures of the desecration were shown in court.

CCTV footage showed two figures spraying the slogans on the memorial. Although they could not be clearly identified, the footage showed one of the vandals discarding the spray can.

Shah, Horninglow, Staffordshire, has no previous convictions.

He was later identified from DNA on the spray can and admitted his actions.

Mr Bodger said: 'Shah wouldn't give an explanation as to why he had done it and had shown no remorse for this very sensitive matter.

'The words were cleaned off without difficulty at a cost of £500.

'The CPS specialist unit was sent the pictures, as well as his mobile phone records, to see if there was a racially or religiously motivated connotation.

'It was decided there was not enough evidence to prove this, and they decided it was politically motivated. It has caused great offence to the community.'

Thursday, 29 April 2010

When grandmother Gillian Duffy suggested immigration was a problem in Rochdale, she was swiftly dismissed as a 'bigot' by Gordon Brown.

But the Prime Minister was betraying not only his real feelings about the worries of millions of Britons, but also his ignorance of what has been going on in the northern town - which provides an acute case study of issues afflicting the whole nation.

For ethnic populations in Rochdale, ten miles north of Manchester, have been rising so fast that the Home Office has been warned it is at risk of race riots, and the council has had to draw up a special housing plan for minorities.The Falinge area of Rochdale which had the highest number of benefit claimants in Britain

The Falinge area of Rochdale which had the highest number of benefit claimants in Britain

Government research last year showed more than a quarter of primary school pupils in Rochdale spoke English as a foreign language - and named one school. Heybrook Primary, where every single one of the 453 pupils spoke English as a second language.

More...

* How a granny exploded politicians' censorship of any election debate on mass immigration... and was demonised as a bigot by Brown * Hung vote 'could tilt Britain into Greek financial turmoil' * Greece crisis is compared to the 'ebola virus' as cost of bailout rises to £105bn and IMF warns problem could spread across EU * Crisis, what crisis? EU demands Britain and other countries pay it £7bn more in 6% budget boost * Acid attack model supporting Labour is dragged into row over CCTV * Lib Dems' secret plan for high street cannabis cafes * QUENTIN LETTS: She was magnificent, she was eloquent. And she spoke, I suspect, for millions * STEPHEN GLOVER: If this woman's a bigot then I'm proud to be one too * EPHRAIM HARDCASTLE: Sky's joyful coverage of Brown's blunder

Large scale immigration to the town began in the post-war years, when thousands of Asians arrived to work in dozens of cotton mills.Gillian Duffy was called a 'bigoted woman' by Gordon Brown when she quizzed him about immigration in Rochdale

Gillian Duffy was called a 'bigoted woman' by Gordon Brown when she quizzed him about immigration in Rochdale

The mills have now gone, but the Pakistani and Bangladeshi Muslims who came to work in them have remained, along with their children and grandchildren.

And census figures have shown that while the white population is actually falling by 2.3 per cent a decade, thanks to high birth rates the Asian population is doubling every 20 years. One church has reacted by offering services in Urdu and Punjabi.

Statistics produced in 2006 counted 16,000 people of Pakistani-origin in Rochdale, one in twelve of the population, along with 3,100 Bangladeshis, and another 8,000 non-whites.

On top of that there were another 5,000 eastern Europeans and other non-British whites.

Yet even in the four years since those figures were produced, the ethnic minority numbers have grown rapidly.

For the opening of European Union borders has led to ever larger numbers of Poles and other eastern Europeans coming to take up low-paid jobs in the town.

The Daily Mail found that numerous Poles were working in a Woolworths depot in Rochdale, while sleeping up to 13-at-a-time in cramped terrace houses.

Rochdale Borough Council recently produced a special 'Black and Minority Ethnic' housing strategy for the town 'in recognition of the increasing ethnic diversity in Rochdale' and the minorities' 'level of housing need'.

In addition to the Asians established locally for decades, the document goes on, there are 'newer and emerging ethnic minority groups' making up the 'refugee and asylum seeker communities for Africa, Afghanistan, Iraq and other countries', as well as eastern Europeans, mainly Poles.

The council document notes: 'In 2007, Rochdale borough had a black and minority ethnic population of 12 per cent, which is projected to increase to 20 per cent by 2021.'Boarded up shops in Rochdale's main shopping strip last year

Boarded up shops in Rochdale's main shopping strip last year

Three years ago it was reported that taxpayers were funding the refurbishment of 500 homes a year for asylum seekers in Rochdale - at a cost of £3,000 a time, with fittings including, freezers, microwaves and even ash trays.

Even before extra strain was placed on resources by the arrival of east Europeans and asylum seekers, recently released Home Office papers showed that in 2001 Rochdale was highlighted as potential race riot 'hot-spot' following violent anarchy in nearby Oldham.

And race relations in the town caused problems for Labour in the last General Election too, when it was claimed a raid on 25 suspected illegal immigrants on a council estate inundated by Africans had been postponed to avoid embarrassing Tony Blair.

Wednesday, 28 April 2010

The leader of UKIP has written to a newspaper group in Somerset urging voters to support the Conservatives rather than his party's candidates.

Lord Pearson said constituents should back the Tory candidates in Wells, Somerton and Frome, and Taunton Deane.

The party has asked its candidate in Wells, Jake Baynes, to stand down, but he has so far refused.

UKIP have a policy of supporting eurosceptics from other parties, which they choose not to stand against.

The party's candidate in Taunton Deane, Tony McIntyre, said last night that he had not been told to step aside, and knew nothing about the open letter to Mid Somerset News and Media until he was contacted by the BBC.

'Betrayal'

Mr Baynes is standing in Wells against Tory eurosceptic David Heathcoat-Amory.

Speaking earlier this month, Mr Baynes said he disagreed with the policy that UKIP should not contest Westminster seats against other genuinely eurosceptic candidates.

"To stand down would be a betrayal... it probably has ruffled a few feathers, but it'll be water off a duck's back at the end of the day," he said.

Lord Pearson has admitted there has been some "disagreement" with Mr Baynes, but that he would not force him to stand down.

Mr Heathcoat-Amory has said he did not believe the number of people voting for him would be affected by whether or not Mr Baynes stood for election.

The other candidates standing in Wells are Richard Boyce, British National Party; Chris Briton, Green; Andy Merryfield, Labour; and Tessa Munt, Liberal Democrat.

Image - the death warrant signed by Stalin for 22,000 Polish officers and nationalists.

Russia today made public for the first time documents proving Soviet NKVD secret police massacred 22,000 Polish officers, intellectuals and other prominent citizens in World War II.

President Dmitry Medvedev released the material in the latest of a flurry of gestures of solidarity with Warsaw since Polish President Lech Kaczynski, his wife and 94 officials were killed in a plane crash en route to a ceremony commemorating the Katyn massacre.

The move also reflects a new willingness by Moscow to accept responsibility for one of the most shameful episodes of the bloody Stalin era.

Sleep now, all you restless ghosts,For the truth is finally set free,From its ark of earth and silence,And the love of the Lord of Hosts,Crowns with his garlands of glory,The heroes lost to evils violence.

Censorship of a South Park episode after Muslim threats has led to calls for an Everybody Draw Mohammed DayBy Tim EdwardsLAST UPDATED 2:47 PM, APRIL 26, 2010Share

A Seattle cartoonist's joke about the censoring of a South Park episode about the Muslim prophet Mohammed has taken on a life of its own. It seems that nothing can now stop May 20 2010 becoming the inaugural 'Everybody Draw Mohammed Day'. Even if, in an ironic twist, its biggest backers have now been scared off.

As reported on The First Post last week, the 201st episode of South Park was censored by its own production company, Comedy Central, after its creators, Trey Parker and Matt Stone, depicted Mohammed for a second week in a row.

The epilogue, normally the slot where one of the central characters talks about what they have learned in the episode, was bleeped out entirely. The monologue was apparently about intimidation and fear and did not even mention Mohammed.

Comedy Central, it transpired, were less gung-ho about offending Muslims than Parker and Stone, who for their 200th episode the week before had drawn Mohammed wearing a bear suit. The depiction provoked a none-too-subtle threat from a US website, RevolutionMuslim.com, which suggested Parker and Stone might suffer the grisly fate of Theo van Gogh, a Dutch film director who was shot dead and nearly decapitated after offending Muslims.

Molly Norris, a Seattle cartoonist, drew her cartoon (above) in the style of a poster by the non-existent group 'Citizens Against Citizens Against Humor or CACAH (pronounced ca-ca)'.

The 'poster' declares May 20 Everybody Draw Mohammed Day, urging participants to "water down the pool of targets" for Muslim extremists.In an interview with Seattle radio station KIRO, Norris said it was the cartoonist's job to be non-PC. "As a cartoonist I just felt so much passion about what had happened I wanted to kind of counter Comedy Central's message they sent about feeling afraid."

Soon, somebody (not Norris) had added Everybody Draw Mohammed Day as an event on the social networking site Facebook, which in turn spawned the Facebook group: 'Ban Everybody Draw Mohammed Day'. Unsurprisingly, what began as a rather positive, faux-naïf cartoon quickly descended into acrimony, with Jon Wellington, the founder of the Everybody Draw Mohammed Day event, washing his hands of it after receiving one too many pictures of the prophet in compromising positions with animals.

Wellington, who must surely be new to the internet, wrote: "I am aghast that so many people are posting deeply offensive pictures of the Prophet. Y'all go ahead if that's your bag, but count me out. And I encourage you all to make some Muslim friends - those of you who clearly have never met a Muslim. Yeesh."

Norris herself has been was taken aback by the huge response her pitch for free speech enjoyed. Admitting to a twinge of fear, she left a statement on her website distancing herself from the now-unstoppable event.

"I did not intend for my cartoon to go viral. I did not intend to be the focus of any 'group'. This particular cartoon has struck a gigantic nerve, something I was totally unprepared for."

In a second cartoon, Norris drew herself under a number of sentiments, including: "I am a coward, I have backed off of being associated with any group or cause."

So where now for Everybody Draw Mohammed Day? Maybe the only public figures brave enough to associate themselves with this campaign are Trey Parker and Matt Stone.

The latest fashion accessory for rich, white, liberals is to adopt a black baby.

Welcome to the New Slave Trade - all you need to do is spend a few thousand dollars and adopt an abandoned black Baby.

Rather than deal with poverty in the black community, and support black families to take care of their own kids, rich white liberals want to keep their wealth (and thereby keep millions of whites and blacks in poverty due to economic inequality) and steal their kids from them in order to display their liberal credentials.

Pathetic.

The video here sums it up about right - we are no longer human beings we are commodities and pets for the rich to do with as they please ;

1) The lib dems represent the last of the political lifeboats for the deluded masses, and the sooner the lifeboat sinks the better. That way the ONLY opposition party is the BNP. A vote for the Lib Dems will accelerate the destruction of the liberal society, as the more insane policies they impose, the faster our people will wake up. At the moment things arent bad enough for them to wake up - A Lib Dems government would destroy British society with its insane liberalism and hasten our rise to power.

2) The Lib Dems PR proposals would mean the BNP would gain about 60 seats in Parliament.

If Labour does badly next week, it is likely that its new leadership will take it closer to the Lib Dems, perhaps even into coalition. Where will its lost voters go then? Mostly, I suspect, to the BNP. At the European election last year, the BNP scored six percent of the poll and NuLab only 15 per cent.

There is a very likely prospect of the BNP fishing for votes amongst the poorer white ex-Labour voters being hit by unemployment, expenditure cuts and higher taxes on petrol and VAT increases. They might score 10 per cent in a future election – and under the Clegg system finish up with over 60 MPs.

Image - Sif (the sister of Heimdall in the comic) and the actress who will play her. Errr, not much of a family resemblance is there.

Image - Heimdall in the Thor comic. Not very black is he.

Image - political correctness in action.

Would they get a white actor to play a black king in the movie version of The Lion King ?

Would they get a white actor to play a black part in Porgie and Bess ?

Would they get a white actor to play a black part in an film based on ancestral African myths ?

No - of course they wouldnt.

But hey, its okay to cast a black actor in the role of Heimdall in the film of Thor.

Frankly Idris Elba should be embarrassed for accepting the part.

Everyone knows he only got the role because of some perverted wish of Kenneth Brannagh to appear Politically Correct and throw in a black face into an movie about Nordic myths.

To be frank he should feel a total prick.

This sort of overt PC casting makes normal people cringe and sets back race relations - as people just say to themselves ' Oh look another token black in a movie, makes a change dont it'.

The fact that a few black actors go along with this patrionising drivel by white directors reveals just how opportunistic they are, and also that they are prepared to embarrass themselves for a few quid.

Idris Elba goes through his paces as a Norse deity on the Friday Night With Jonathan Ross show. Photograph: Brian J Ritchie/Rex Features

Even for an actor who has played a vampire-hunter with a guilty conscience, a Baltimore crime lord with a taste for Adam Smith, and an asset manager with a stalker, the role of the Norse deity Heimdall – guardian of the burning rainbow bridge between the world of men and the world of gods – was always going to be a bit of a challenge.

But playing a god in Kenneth Branagh's forthcoming film Thor has turned out to be the least of Idris Elba's worries, after fans of the comic books turned on the star of The Wire for reasons that have nothing to do with his acting ability and everything to do with the colour of his skin.

When news emerged late last year that the 37-year-old black Londoner had been chosen to play Heimdall, "the whitest of the gods", a being who can hear the sap flowing in trees and look across time and space, many devotees of the Marvel comics on which the film is based flocked to online forums to weep, gnash their teeth and unleash a tide of indignation.

A fortnight ago, the actor told Jonathan Ross that his take on Heimdall was "Norse by way of Hackney, Canning Town". And at the beginning of the month, he told a press conference that he saw his casting as an encouraging step.

His view was not shared among the more vehement of the comic books' fans. "This PC crap has gone too far!" wailed one. "Norse deities are not of an African ethnicity! … It's the principle of the matter. It's about respecting the integrity of the source material, both comics and Norse mythologies."

Fellow fans were quick to nod their horn-helmeted heads.

"At the risk of sounding like a bigot, I think this is nuts!" said another. "Asgard is home to the Norse Gods!!! Not too many un-fair complexion types roaming the frigid waste lands up there. I wouldn't expect to see many Brad Pitt types walking around in the [first mainstream black superhero] Black Panther's Wakanda Palace!"

Elba, who was born in Hackney, north-east London, to a Ghanaian mother and Sierra Leonean father, has addressed such concerns in a string of recent interviews.

"There has been a big debate about it: can a black man play a Nordic character?" he told TV Times. "Hang about, Thor's mythical, right? Thor has a hammer that flies to him when he clicks his fingers. That's OK, but the colour of my skin is wrong?

"I was cast in Thor and I'm cast as a Nordic god," he said. "If you know anything about the Nords, they don't look like me but there you go. I think that's a sign of the times for the future. I think we will see multi-level casting. I think we will see that, and I think that's good."

Elba, who shot to fame as the erudite and thoughtful gangster Stringer Bell in critically acclaimed US television serial The Wire, also used his interview with TV Times to warn viewers against pigeonholing his new BBC crime drama, Luther, just because it was about a black policeman.

"I think we'll put ourselves in a corner if we just describe Luther as a black detective," he said. "There haven't been many in the past, but the fact that he's black is neither here nor there."

The actor added that while it was "great to have a character who happens to be black in the central position … he still bleeds, just like anyone else".

Elba is working in the US and was unavailable for comment yesterday.

However, his publicist flatly dismissed any suggestion of a row between fans and film-makers, telling the Guardian that the actor was merely being mischievous. "There's no controversy," said Rupert Fowler. "Idris was being flippant in the [TV Times] interview."

His UK agent, Roger Charteris, said Elba had chosen the role of Heimdall on artistic rather than political grounds. "He just wanted to do the movie and work with Kenneth Branagh.

"He liked the script and he liked the movie and he had always wanted to work with Kenneth Branagh. It wasn't like a statement: 'Oh, I'm going to do this.' It's always a purely creative decision."

Or perhaps Elba was seeking to emulate his fellow British actor and Wire costar Dominic West. Last year, West – who has played the Ukrainian-Russian son of Pablo Picasso, a Spartan statesman and a French detective – revealed he had decided to accept the part of the Australian scientist Professor Howard Florey in a BBC TV drama about the discovery of penicillin, in protest against non-English actors playing famous English roles. "I was sort of smarting from Russell Crowe coming over here and playing Robin Hood and all these foreigners coming over here and stealing our great heroes," he said, his tongue lodged firmly in his cheek. "I felt I was striking a blow back by being a Brit playing a foreigner."

The Equality and Human Rights Commission said: "It's up to the casting director and producers to decide who is suitable for a role. It is not actually illegal to discriminate for authenticity purposes in the theatre. There is an exception under the Race Relations Act which says if it is required for the role, you can ask for someone of a certain colour."

It appears mocking Jesus is funny and acceptable, but mocking Mohammed is a big no-no for the funny boys who make South Park.

Whilst American soldiers are dying in Afghanistan to secure free speech and a democracy for the Afghan people (allegedly) these two wimps are hiding in America in their gated communities surrounded by police and weeping like a pair of little girls because some sad, half assed Jihadist on a website made a threat.

(2) In section 136 (penalties in relation to demonstrations in the vicinity of Parliament) for subsection (4) substitute--

"(4) A person who is guilty of an offence under section 44 or 45 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 in relation to which an offence mentioned in subsection (1), (2) or (3) is the anticipated offence (as defined by section 47(9) of that Act) is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 51 weeks, to a fine not exceeding level 4 on the standard scale or to both.

The fact that a journalist wrote a fair, as opposed to the NUJ demanded anti-BNP biased journalism that is required to be produced by its members, articles about the BNP which stated the truth of a BNP meeting - and then that article is forced off of the website of the paper - shows you we are living in a state just like the Nazis or Communists.

The Red Guard of the NUJ have imposed censorship on our society.

This is not a democracy.

This is a politically correct liberal fascist state - and we in the BNP are going to smash it.

And one day those guilty of its construction will pay for it.

Those who have stolen our democracy from us will one day reap their reward.

And yes, that is a threat to the guilty.

The guilty should be afraid.

One day the law under a BNP government will catch up with them.

http://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/news/100428gazbnp.shtml

Essex weekly takes down BNP story after complaintsby holdthefrontpage staffA weekly newspaper has removed an article about the British National Party from its website after complaints from readers.

Last week's edition of the Brentwood Gazette featured a report on a BNP election meeting in the town which presented the party in what some claimed was a flattering light.

The story's intro read: "Proud nationalists were asked to dig deep to support an election candidate when the Brentwood branch of the BNP met for the first time.

It continued: "Buoyant supporters packed into the back room of a patriotic pub for the inaugural meeting of the Brentwood and Chelmsford branch, which has been founded in response to the party's growing membership."

The story, originally published in print last Wednesday, swiftly generated a host of comments on the paper's thisistotalessex.co.uk website.

Will from Chelmsford wrote: "I am surprised that the reporter who attended this meeting didn't make a contribution to the BNP themselves, from the tone of the article it sounds like they're already a fully paid up member! So much for impartiality and journalistic integrity."

Kev, also from Chelmsford, wrote: "Where have journalism and editing gone on this site? No questions raised or cross examining? None at all.

"This looks as though a BNP press release has been regurgitated in its entirety. Hardly the actions of an independent media during the run up to a general election."

One reader, who asked not to be named, contacted HTFP to say she would be reporting the paper to the Press Complaints Commission over the story.

However the story, along with all the comments, has now been taken down from the site.

Brentwood Gazette editor-in-chief Alan Geere has so far not responded to requests for a comment on the episode.

Tuesday, 27 April 2010

Nothing British attack the BNP because of its 'Protectionism' - but seeing as I was one of the people who drew up the policy, I will explain it for the Blue Baron Bethell and his sidekick Maurice.

The BNP policy on protectionism is based on what we call 'Ethical Capitalism' which is a form of capitalism that is based on strict environmental, social and ethical principles which do not exploit workers, children, the natural environment, communities, society or rights of workers in foreign nations - both in the UK and abroad.

The endless list of faulty goods imported into the West that have injured and killed people, the environmental destruction caused to developing nations, the corruption caused by the West in developing nations, the child labour and slavery - all these things must be stopped and in order to do that we intend to prohibit any imports into the UK from nations that exploit their own people and environments.

This is the antidote to the poison of globalism, a free market model that places the people and the environment before profits for the global corporations and corrupt governments.

The Tories in Nothing British About the BNP, and their left wing lackeys, all support the globalisation of the planet - the Tories because it makes them rich when they import in cheap consumer goods to peddle to people and the Left because a global free market means the free movement of people around the world to act as surplus labour.

Any political party that does not adopt our model of Protectionism and Ethical Capitalism is a party that is in the grasp of the global slave traders and eco-destroyers.

The BNP does not want cheap consumer goods peddled in the UK that make the rich richer and the poor in Britain and abroad poorer.

The BNP are the only moral and ethical political party in Britain, as only we put the interests of our people - AND THE INTERESTS OF ALL PEOPLE AND THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT - before the interests of the global exploiters.

Here is what our manifesto says below ;

Globalisation and the Protection of British Industry

The BNP opposes globalisation which is extremely harmful to our nation for two reasons:

- It results in the importation into the West of millions of immigrants (in the form of “cheap” labour) from the Third World; and

- It transfers technology, manufacturing and industry to the Third World. This in turn causes the exploitation in labour in those nations and ultimately the collapse of our own living standards due to the inability of our industries to compete with that “cheap” labour.

The BNP also objects to the existence of disagreeable practices in the Third World, often tolerated by globalist corporations in the pursuit of international profit.

Such examples include the employment of child labour, the use of political and other prisoners to produce goods, lax environmental rules that would not be tolerated in the West, poor protection for workers, the absence of trades unions and employees’ representation, onerous working hours, an absence of social security systems, health insurance and so on.

We are also aware of the restrictions many countries impose to protect their home industry, either in the form of red tape or direct tariffs.

We shall therefore impose selective tariffs on the import of goods from the Third World. Only those foreign nations and corporations who agree to abide by our strict social, environmental and ethical trading policies will be permitted to export their goods freely into the United Kingdom market.

To allow industry and commerce to adapt, tariffs will be imposed gradually through the years of our first term in office.

We are wary of the burden this may place on British consumers. In consequence, to avoid any general upward price movement, we shall reduce VAT (or such equivalent as we may introduce) with a view to securing revenue neutrality.

As already observed, some 60 percent of the world’s trade occurs as internal transfers within multinational corporations. This is detrimental to the environment and the measures outlined in this manifesto will diminish this proportion.

Not least, the option of closing down British manufacturing or services in favour of the Third World will become an unattractive proposition.

Finally, whilst we oppose globalisation, we would observe that the process creates disequilibrium within developing countries where self-sufficiency is eroded in favour of cash-crops, for example, at an expense to the environment.

Nothing British are trying to argue that globalisation and cheap goods made in foreign nations are beneficial to Britain.

Ignore the issue of British factories closing, British workers thrown on the dole and lets look at the real price being paid for those cheap consumer goods that Baron Bethell, Maurice Cousins and his other Tory chums so love as supporters of the global economy.

I am sure Nothing British love the fact that we get cheap consumer goods in the UK made by children in factories in India, beef made from farmers who are chopping down the rainforest, sofas from china filled with toxic chemicals, pet food and toothpaste from china filled with poisons, products made in Taiwanese sweatshops with bonded labour, goods made in Chinese gulags filled with prisoners convicted of crimes like ‘wanting a democracy’, jewellery products made from resources like blood diamonds and such goods as heroin, cocaine and ‘party drugs’ made in chemical factories in China that kill British kids.

Thats the joy of cheap goods in a global economy.

Slave labour.

Child labour.

Environmental destruction.

Death, corruption and warfare.

Nothing British About The BNP = total idiots.

Thats the real price people in those countries pay for the cheap goods sold in Britain.

Errr a slight problem for the liberals here - if race is just a 'social construct' then why does the human brain recognise different racial groups ?

The fact is that this if further evidence that the multi-cultural system and racial diversity causes cognitive shutdown - in that empathy is the basis of society.

But empathy does not exist in multi-cultural societies.

This is also proved by research such in Bowling Alone by Robert Puttnam which shows that the more racially diverse a society is - the more withdrawn, isolated, unhappy people become and the more society breaks down.

Diversity is not our strength - Diversity is a curse that kills society and communities.

A minority of integrated immigrants can assimilate into a society and community and cause no real problems, but multi-cultural colonisation, as we see all around us, where they live in ghettoes of their own making, impose their own culture upon us and expect us to surrender our culture and where they are forming colonies = the death of society.

http://www.physorg.com/news191502142.html

Human brain recognizes and reacts to raceApril 26, 2010

The human brain fires differently when dealing with people outside of one's own race, according to new research out of the University of Toronto Scarborough.

This research, conducted by social neuroscientists at UofT Scarborough, explored the sensitivity of the "mirror-neuron-system" to race and ethnicity. The researchers had study participants view a series of videos while hooked up to electroencephalogram (EEG) machines. The participants - all white - watched simple videos in which men of different races picked up a glass and took a sip of water. They watched white, black, South Asian and East Asian men perform the task.

Typically, when people observe others perform a simple task, their motor cortex region fires similarly to when they are performing the task themselves. However, the UofT research team, led by PhD student Jennifer Gutsell and Assistant Professor Dr. Michael Inzlicht, found that participants' motor cortex was significantly less likely to fire when they watched the visible minority men perform the simple task. In some cases when participants watched the non-white men performing the task, their brains actually registered as little activity as when they watched a blank screen.

"Previous research shows people are less likely to feel connected to people outside their own ethnic groups, and we wanted to know why," says Gutsell. "What we found is that there is a basic difference in the way peoples' brains react to those from other ethnic backgrounds. Observing someone of a different race produced significantly less motor-cortex activity than observing a person of one's own race. In other words, people were less likely to mentally simulate the actions of other-race than same-race people"

The trend was even more pronounced for participants who scored high on a test measuring subtle racism, says Gutsell.

"The so-called mirror-neuron-system is thought to be an important building block for empathy by allowing people to 'mirror' other people's actions and emotions; our research indicates that this basic building block is less reactive to people who belong to a different race than you," says Inzlicht.

However, the team says cognitive perspective taking exercises, for example, can increase empathy and understanding, thereby offering hope to reduce prejudice. Gutsell and Inzlicht are now investigating if this form of perspective-taking can have measurable effects in the brain.

The team's findings are published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

Steve Hofmeyr has always had an opinion on current affairs in South Africa, but his open letter to Julius Malema kicked the hornet's nest of South African opinion.

iafrica.com asked Hofmeyr if he has any regrets about his letter, whether he agrees with Eugene Terre'Blanche's political ideals, and why he thinks Afrikaans culture needs protection.

You've said some pretty inflammatory things over the past couple of weeks. If you could, would you take any of it back?

I would certainly rephrase the "black" generalisation. Mine was in an open letter to Julius Malema and his hypocritical ilk. It remains deceitful bigotry to defy the West as well as benefit from it. You cannot do both. And this is my problem with Fat Black Hypocrites. His reaction to the BBC man's question about owning a house in Sandton betrays this. But, despite my apology, black folk are not entirely honest about their ancestors' contributions.

The ANC has called Julius Malema into a disciplinary hearing, do you think that your open letter to Malema contributed to this?

I hope so, but I doubt it. Malema has seriously damaged tourism and World Cup prospects. I have an entire circle of friends who cancelled their tickets after his fatwa on Afrikaners.

What action would you like them to take against him?

Whatever the law prescribes. Nobody is unreasonable about this. He is guilty of hate-speech and by implication, murder. But the latter cannot be proved.

Do you think that the Afrikaans culture needs more protection than any other culture in SA? If so, what sets it apart?

Statistics set it apart. Widely apart. Post-struggle euphoria finds karma in marginalising that culture and its contributions. But while everyone is having a laugh at my inflated reactions, "foolish" rightwing rhetoric and AWB costumes, our mortality rate as a tribe, borders on genocide. Lives lost are not okay under any circumstances in any demographic, but this is ridiculous.

You attended Terre'Blanche's funeral and have mentioned that he was a friend. Do you agree with the values that he stood for?

We agreed on no politics at all. But I did meet the pacified ET, after his sentence. With changing values. But his values as a cultural icon were beyond reproach. His other less admirable traits were always in defence of what he thought was the Boerevolk's land, the old republic's, legally obtained, by the way. What has been laughed off as rightwing rhetoric has actually yet to be answered. Calmly and with sobriety. I wanted to mediate that debate.

Do you think that most Afrikaners are sympathetic to Terre'Blanche's ideals?

Impossible to say, but the small AWB membership does not account for the thousands of travelling mourners to Ventersdorp on funeral day. Our Constitution should take care of folk even if only two arrive as a minority grouping. It may be that more folk see him like I do: the embodiment of a once proud Boerevolk who on their day defeated larger and stronger armies for their place in the sun; who sang from the Psalms&Gesange without opening those books; who bought traces of civilisation to sub-Saharan chaos; who spent centuries with their fingers digging into drought-stricken land to heed crops; and who mobilised against the odds following the whispers of their God. It may not all be relevant today, but it is the heritage that got me here and for which I shall fight for.

What are you hoping to achieve through your political activism?

The Break Even Point. True redemption. Where South Africans admit that no amount of compensation can alleviate the pain or bring back the dead. That all suffered in turn sometime.

Professor Es'kia Mphahlele said in 1990, "Our commitment to the Afrikan [sic] landscape goes deeper because we have a spiritual bond to it, having suffered for it".

We find Break Even Point and carry on from here as New South Africans without patronising each other with rights to entitlement, tenderpreneurs, nepotism, BEE, quotas and affirmative action. It's sickening and dreadfully uneconomical. This floundering economy cannot be saved with poverty-stricken masses being milked dry by self-enriching, unaccountable governments.

If Malema came over for a braai, what would you chat about? (And what food would you serve?)

We'd compare lists, simply because he doesn't think a white man is entitled to a list. I'd certainly have my mom over to slap some manners into his face. The food is the peace pipe. It's secondary to the chat. It's also my reconciliatory gesture — but I won't hold my breath.

Do you think that white South Africans — or indeed Afrikaners — can all be lumped together in one big cultural group?

Only those who want to. And nobody qualifies to excommunicate anyone else from membership. I meet plenty English folk too who feel the need to be proud of their white heritage without being labelled a racist. But I cannot be a proud South African if I cannot be a proud Afrikaner. It's not debatable.

How do you think South Africans can go about healing the rifts that have appeared over the past few weeks?

We embrace the tougher South Africa. The one where open societies meet and confront each other's toughest concerns. The very braai we should have had 15 years ago. I'm tired of f**king around.

Oh look at how non-racist those mexicans are with their immigration laws.

One law for whitey - one law for all those with a darker skin tone.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Mexico

Mexicans have priority over foreigners under equality of circumstances for all classes of concessions and for all employment, positions, or commissions of the Government in which the status of citizenship is not indispensable. Foreigners can serve in the military only during wartime.[2]

Only Mexicans by birth or naturalization and Mexican companies have the right to acquire ownership of lands, waters, and their appurtenances, or to obtain concessions for the exploitation of mines or of waters.

1. There will be no special bilingual programs in the schools, no special ballots for elections, and all government business will be conducted in our language.

2. Foreigners will NOT have the right to vote, no matter how long they are here.

3. Foreigners will NEVER be able to hold political office.

4. Foreigners will not be a burden to the taxpayers. No welfare, no food stamps, no health care, nor any other government assistance programs.

5. Foreigners can invest in this country, but it must be an amount equal to 40,000 times the daily minimum wage.

6. If foreigners do come and want to buy land that will be okay, BUT options will be restricted. You are not allowed to own waterfront property. That property is reserved for citizens naturally born into this country.

7. Foreigners may not protest; no demonstrations, no waving a foreign flag, no political organizing, no "bad-mouthing" our president or his policies. If you do you will be sent home.

8. If you do come to this country illegally, you will be hunted down and sent straight to jail.

Harsh, you say ?.. The above laws happen to be the immigration laws of MEXICO

In order to prove they are not racist, whites must become racist against their own people.

Dont bother applying for the job below if you are white.

Bang goes our meritocracy.

From Aristocracy to Affirmative Action in one small step - and fuck the white working class.

http://www.screenyorkshire.co.uk/tra...acement-scheme

Quote:

The Foundation Placement Scheme is a 9 month, pre-entry level, paid, vocational training placement for individuals from Black, Asian or Minority Ethnic backgrounds who are looking to build experience in the media industry. Screen Yorkshire, ITV Yorkshire, BBC and Skillset will give talented individuals from across the region the opportunity to gain the skills, experience and networks in order to kick-start a career in media & broadcasting.

Unlike most of the liberal moron journalists I dont live in an all white middle class enclave ivory tower, I am not ferried to work on BBC license fee money in taxis and I dont have a posh car to drive around in to avoid the 'proles' in the street.

I have to get buses and trains.

On buses I sit next to real people - not wanker liberal media types.

And I also sit next to school kids.

And when I sit next to those kids I listen to what they say, and trust me all you liberal mummys and daddys out there, your little Johhny and Sarah are angry, pissed off with political correctness and against the sick multi-cultural society you created.

The kids I hear are the most racist and angry people I have ever heard.

Sure a few kids have ethnic friends - but when they see their ethnic friends play the race card when they leave school to get jobs whilst they are abandoned on the dole simply because they are white - then those friendships will soon end.

Friendships will soon end when a friend you went to school with who never once experienced any 'racism' at any time in their life, plays the race card to get on and in effect exploits the multi-cultural system to destroy meritocracy.

This unfairness and cynical abuse of the race card will soon unravel communities and friendships, for when white kids realise their ethnic friends are being given jobs and promotion not on merit but simply on the basis of their skin colour - then those white kids will get very, very angry.

Even though they have been raised from birth and fed the poison of multi-cultural propaganda, they have seen through it.

And the faster the politically correct state imposes more positive discrimination, affirmative action and anti-white laws - then the faster multi-culturalism will unravel.

Today the kids hold multi-culturalism and the teachers, media lackeys and their parents who peddle the bullshit with total contempt.

Tomorrow they will hate them for it.

The ONLY white people that support the multi-cultural society are brainwashed morons, paid agents of the state and media and brain dead lemmings - their parents to be exact.

Anyone who believes what the government tells them, what the papers tell them and what their lefty teachers tell them is a moron.

When you experience the real world, as opposed to the fantasy world peddled to the masses by the mindbenders in the media, schools and government - then you wake up.

And over 1 million young people at this moment are waking up.

And sooner or later they will come to despise the sad, pitiful remnants of the sixties, those white, middle class morons and liberal cowards who are happy to hide in their nice houses whilst our country goes to shit.

It is the kids who bear the brunt of the multi-cultural experiment.

They are the ones being mugged, raped and robbed by the immigrant scum we have imported into this country.

They are the ones who are having to dodge bullets, bombs and knife attacks by gangs of immigrant thugs, terrorists and criminal gangs.

And they are angry to a degree I have never seen.

In the 1960's if you wanted to be a 'rebel' at university then you flew the Red Flag from your student dorm window.

Now the only form of rebellion left is to fly the Union Jack or Cross of St. George - as if you are at university you soon realise that the hippie liberal lefty idiots of the 1960's are now the tutors, and they still peddle the same old socialist / communist old bollocks as they did then to the kids in their classes.

This is why so many pathetic miranda's and tarquins from the white middle class end up going on UAF demonstrations - as they are peddled this old bollocks and anti-white propaganda by their teachers at colleges and universities.

They are young enough and dumb enough to still believe what they are told by their teachers and the media.

The fact that they are in effect cutting their own throats, as by supporting mass immigration and political correctness and affirmative actions schemes that put ethnics first in the job markets they are ensuring they do not get jobs, will one day trigger an awareness in their naieve young minds that 'hey man, I have been lied too'.

And on that day British White youth will rise up.

The millions of unemployed young people are the future of the BNP.

One day they will leave their schools and universities, go out into society and see for themselves that they are third class citizens in their own country.

They wont be able to get jobs as ethnics will get them on the grounds of their skin tone, homosexuals on the grounds of their sexuality, lesbians on the grounds of their sexuality or simply because they embrace a non- Christian and non-Indigneous religion.

They wont be able to buy houses as they cant get jobs.

They cant afford to buy houses as immigration has pushed the prices too high for them.

They wont be able to get council houses as the immigrants have them.

They wont be able to have kids as they cannot afford them.

And whilst this happens they will see ethnics and immigrants getting rich, getting houses, getting jobs and still whining and moaning about 'racism' whilst they have become the new Ethnic Middle Class.

And they will soon see that the Yasmin Alibhi Brown's who peddle anti-white race propaganda for their own benefit from their wealthy, all white middle class enclaves are nothing more than vile opportunists - peddling 'ant-racist' bullshit whilst growing rich from multi-culturalism.

They meanwhile will be poor, unemployed, homeless and pissed off.

And the moment they realise that their own parents and teachers, the scumbag supporters of liberalism and multi-culturalism, were the ones who put them in that position due to their cowardice, selfishness and apathy - then they are ours.

Whilst Digby Jones, the voice of the global capitalist scum, demands that the government 'starves' white kids into doing menial slave labour (but such rules will not apply to the ethnics will it as that would be 'racist') we demand an end to immigration, British jobs for British workers, an end to racist anti-white affirnative action plans, the total deportation of the 1 million illegals in the UK and a new Industrial Revolution to give our youth jobs and careers.

Any suicide is heartbreaking: when the victim is young it is next to unbearable. If there is a circumstantial reason given rather than a severe mental illness running its course, such a death cries to heaven for a response. True, all suicides are individual and essentially inexplicable; but sometimes a full-scale tragedy points our attention to a thousand less dramatic miseries. Thus the death by overdose of Vicky Harrison, aged 21, should shake us out of political vapouring to focus our gaze on an unfolding national disaster.

Ms Harrison, we learn, left notes to her parents and boyfriend saying “I don’t want to be me any more” and asking them to try to be happy. She died on the eve of her fortnightly trip to sign on for jobseeker’s allowance: her parents say that her humiliation stemmed from having been unable to find a job in two years. “She just wanted to work and earn some cash,” says her father, and depression dogged her because she could not afford to go out to see her friends. She had plenty of them, and a good home and a boyfriend; yet she was socially excluded. That modish phrase is glibly used for mere economic deprivation, but exclusion from the world of work and usefulness can be just as painful.

Having dropped out of a university course (ah, the chimera of film and media studies: useful for some, a door to disillusion for others) she applied first for dinner-lady or secretarial jobs in schools in the hope of becoming a teaching assistant. Then she tramped round the supermarkets, willing to stack shelves, anything to join a workforce. No luck. “She felt she had no future,” says her father.

Enough. It is a private tragedy. But before we leave Vicky Harrison, note that none of the clichés apply. She was not one of the illiterate, innumerate school-leavers bewailed by the CBI; she had ten decent GCSEs and two A levels including English language (a good indicator of employability). She was not an addict or a hoody or a teenage single mother, not working the benefits system, not claiming incapacity benefit for “stress” because she preferred daytime TV. She was personable, hated handouts and would have taken any job. She was a bright, hopeful unit in our national future. Now, she isn’t. We should care, a lot.

There are nearly a million 18 to 24-year-olds looking for jobs right now. Few will be suicides or turn to crime and drugs, though research suggests that the young unemployed are three times as likely to get into trouble. But, whether school-leavers or graduates, a willing young generation may become a lost legion. When your first encounter with the adult world delivers the blunt message that it doesn’t need you, the effect is even deeper and more damaging than mid-career redundancy. It may not be as practically awkward, given that you probably don’t have children and can live with your parents; but in your head and heart it is lethal. Failure to launch!

The long-term unemployment of the 1980s left a trail of demotivated, unaccustomed, increasingly ineffective potential workers; perhaps without that we would not now be so risibly dependent on immigrant labour. Now it risks happening again. It is a mass psychological disaster.

One of my first reporting jobs, in the late Seventies, was to interview a group of young people in Oxfordshire who had been — gasp, shock! — a whole year looking for work.

I remember how nice they were, brushed and tidied to meet the BBC, anxious to please, humiliation flickering in their eyes. They were bright enough, interested in the world and in learning a trade, happy to lower their sights but unable to find even the humblest billet. Their plight was considered rare and scandalous. Now it gets shrugged off as just another routine rebalancing of capitalism — until a pretty young woman acts out her despair in the worst of ways.

What would help? We can’t rely even on a hypothetical growing economy, because these days that generally means a further influx of overseas workers from the far corners of the EU and beyond, tempting to unscrupulous employers because they can be exploited rotten until they wise up, and won’t have voluble parents complaining to the papers about their work conditions. We can’t keep on inventing gimcrack projects and dead-end subsidised apprenticeships; we can’t expect even the more affluent to be unpaid interns for years, though they at least feel themselves useful. We certainly can’t just harrumph along with David Cameron about cutting the benefits of “those who choose not to work”, unless we acknowledge that there are plenty who are absolutely desperate to work but spend years being told that they’re overqualified, or inexperienced, or just unnecessary.

Nor can we just blame the recession. Before it started, during the boom years, we had 15 per cent of 16-25s out of work. An inconvenient truth is that employing people has, for sweetly idealistic reasons, become so hedged about with regulation, cost and commitment that hiring someone is almost like marrying them. Any company thinks twice these days before taking anybody on, especially anybody young and untried. The employers’ national insurance rise is hardly going to change that for the better.

It is impossible not to link all this to the difficulties of women such as Vicky Harrison. In France, three years ago, Dominique de Villepin, then Prime Minister, tried to address it in a novel way: he proposed flexible job contracts for first-time workers under 26 — the CPE or first employment contract. Within the first two years they could be dismissed with no reason given, and employing any young person who had been six months out of work would exempt you from national insurance. Thus, employers might take a punt, and the young get a chance to prove themselves. Three months later, after violent demonstrations, the Government stepped back and the unions crowed. Now the French stick to the tired old stuff we go in for here — training schemes, internships, fake jobs, anything to keep the figures down.

But it’s real jobs they want, these young: to be needed, useful, a cog in the machine. Even if it’s a job you have to laugh at in the pub that evening. Many young French voices — drowned by union rhetoric — said precarious employment on the CPE would be better than none. I suspect ours would agree. But what politician would dare roll back some of the stifling regulation and expense entailed in giving them a chance?