“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″

“The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.”…Ecclesiastes 1:9

This is too scary to be funny.

The Citizen Wells blog has been warning about the close parallels between the Obama camp and Nazi Germany and “1984” by George Orwell since early 2008. If you didn’t believe it then, you certainly must believe it now.

Attack Watch Obama thought police, Nazi Germany and 1984 revisited.

George Orwell predicted this in his book, “1984.”
Nazi Germany, with their book burning and control of the press along
with the Stalinist Soviet Union, made this a harsh reality in the 20th century. The Obama regime has raised this to a level in the 21st century. The Obama Thought Police already controlled the mainstream media. With AttackWatch.com they are attempting to control all other shared thought and information. Welcome to the world of Big Brother.

Below are some quotes from “1984.” These quotes were used regularly on this site for over 3 years. Did the Obama camp use “1984” as a guidebook?

“As usual, the face of Emmanuel Goldstein, the Enemy of the people, had flashed onto the screen. There were hisses here and there among the audience. The little sandyhaired woman gave a squeak of mingled fear and disgust. Goldstein was the renegade and backslider who once, long ago (how long ago, nobody quite remembered), had been one of the leading figures of the party, almost on a level with Big Brother himself, and then had engaged in counterrevolutionary activities , had been condemned to death, and had mysteriously escaped and disappeared. The program of the Two Minutes Hate varied from day to day, but there was none in which Goldstein was not the principal figure. He was the primal traitor, the earliest defiler of the Party’s purity. All subsequent crimes against the Party, all treacheries, acts of sabotage, heresies, deviations, sprang directly out of his teaching. Somewhere or other he was still alive and hatching his conspiracies: perhaps somewhere beyond the sea, under the protection of his foreign paymasters; perhaps even–so it was occasionally rumored–in some hiding place in Oceania itself.”

“Goldstein was delivering his usual venomous attack upon the doctrines of the Party–an attack so exaggerated and perverse that a child should have been able to see through it, and yet just plausible enough to fill one with an alarmed feeling that other people, less level-headed than oneself, might be taken in by it. He was abusing Big Brother, he was denouncing the dictatorship of the Party, he was demanding the immediate conclusion of peace with Eurasia, he was advocating freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, freedom of thought”

“Before the Hate had proceeded for thirty seconds, uncontrollable exclamations of rage were breaking out from half the people in the room.”
“the sight or even the thought of Goldstein produced fear and anger automatically.”
“He was an object of hatred more constant than either Eurasia or Eastasia.”
“There were also whispered stories of a terrible book, a compendium of all the heresies”
“In it’s second minute the Hate rose to a frenzy. People were leaping up and down in their places and shouting at the tops of their voices”

Substitute a mainstream media outlet or pro Obama site for the Times in the following:

“Winston dialed “back numbers” on the telescreen and called
for the appropriate issues of the Times, which slid out of
the pneumatic tube after only a few minutes’ delay. The
messages he had received referred to articles or news items
which for one reason or another it was thought necessary to
alter, or, as the official phrase had it, to rectify. For
example, it appeared from the Times of the seventeenth of
March that Big Brother, in his speech of the previous day,
had predicted that the South Indian front would remain quiet
but that a Eurasian offensive would shortly be launched in
North Africa. As it happened, the Eurasian Higher Command
had launched its offensive in South India and left North
Africa alone. It was therefore necessary to rewrite a
paragraph of Big Brother’s speech in such a way as to make
him predict the thing that had actually happened.”
“the Times of the nineteenth of December had published the official forecasts of the output of various classes of consumption goods in the fourth quarter of 1983, which was also the sixth quarter of the Ninth Three-Year Plan. Today’s issue contained a statement of the actual output, from which it appeared that the forecasts were in every instance grossly wrong. Winston’s job was to rectify the original figures by making them agree with the later ones.”

“As soon as all the corrections which happened to be necessary in any partiucular number of the Times had been assembled and collated, that number would be reprinted, the original copy destroyed, and the corrected copy placed on the files in it’s stead. This process of continuation alteration was applied not only to newspapers, but to books, periodicals, pamphlets, posters, leaflets, films, sound tracks, cartoons, photographs–to every kind of literature or documentation which might conceivably hold any political or ideological significance. Day by day and almost minute by minute the past was brought up to date. In this way every prediction made by the Party could be shown by documentary evidence to be correct; nor was any item of news, or expression of opinion, which conflicted with the needs of the moment, ever allowed to be on record.”

For anyone watching the internet being scrubbed or updated with revisionist history, the following will resonate:

“To the future or to the past, to a time when thought is
free, when men are different from one another and do not
live alone–to a time when truth exists and what is done
cannot be undone:

From the age of uniformity, from the age of solitude,
from the age of Big Brother, from the age of doublethink–
greetings!”
“If the party could thrust its hand into the past and say
of this and that event, it never happened–that, surely,
was more terrifying than mere torture and death.”

“The past, he reflected, had not merely been altered, it had
actually been destroyed. For how could you establish, even
the most obvious fact when there existed no record outside
your own memory?”

AttackWatch.com

The Hitler youth were encouraged to turn in teachers and parents who did not conform to party ideology. Orwell wrote:

“With those children [Winston] thought, that wretched woman must lead a life of terror. Another year, two years, and they would be watching her night and day for symptoms of unorthodoxy. Nearly all children nowadays were horrible. What was worst of all was that by means of such organizations as the Spies they were systematically turned into ungovernable little savages, and yet this produced in them no tendency whatever to rebel against the discipline of the Party.”
“”You’re a traitor!” yelled the boy. “You’re a thought criminal!””

No one paying attention will find this hard to believe:

“We control life, Winston, at all its levels. You are imagining that there is something called human nature which will be outraged by what we do and will turn against us. But we create human nature. Men are infinitely malleable.”

Whether it’s the CIA or the military, sophisticated surveillance is proving inadequate, and proper background checks of Middle Easterners aren’t being done. Each example serves as another case in point. What makes us think that the State Department​ would update its virus protection program? Even more disconcerting than Mohamed and Balawi is Secretary of State Hillary Clinton​’s aide and Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin, who has been with Clinton since 1996. She was never properly screened, this will be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.

To be concerned about Abedin’s access to sensitive information is an issue that will most likely garner unsolicited curses from “sensitive” Americans who are enamored with her. These same people ignore this diva’s familial ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. Lt. Col. Robert Anderson’s detailed reports aimed at getting Army intelligence to investigate Ali Mohamed—and have him court-martialed—were also ignored.

Abedin is even more potentially dangerous: She can leak state secrets. She is closely associated with her Muslim Brotherhood family and even joined Clinton at an event with her mother, Saleha Abedin, at Dar El-Hekma College in Saudi Arabia. Also present was a close associate of Saleha Abedin—Suheir Qureshi. Qureshi’s name later appeared in several prominent Arab newspapers when it was revealed that she belonged to a list of 63 members of the secret arm of the Muslim Brotherhood called The Sisterhood. The full list was later revealed—Huma Abedin​’s mother is on it. Huma’s brother—Hassan Abedin—also collaborates with Omar Naseef and Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, two of the most influential terror supporters in the world.

And while the U.S. House of Representatives debated whether to cut off funds for Obama’s military campaign in Libya , which aids the Brotherhood-backed rebels, Clinton challenged Congress over its position, asking, “Whose side are you on?”

This is a question the secretary of state should ask herself.

Even the team that was set up because of the State Department’s policy designed to “engage the moderate Muslim world” was infiltrated without even screening its contributor, the Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer and—Egyptian by heritage—Ground Zero Mosque imam, Sheikh Feisal Abdul Rauf, who only moderates his tone in English.

Promoting a moderate Muslim Brotherhood is like promoting “capitalistic communism” to defeat Russia during the Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.​, or even a “pro-Jew Nazism” during World War II. A more current and real-life example is “Chrislam.”

Clinton’s “inclusion policy” has brought in spies, and this is how she plans to soften the Muslim Brotherhood? Clinton’s use of oxymoronic formulas to combat terrorism is worse than the moronic path taken by the likes of Jordanian doctor and double agent Humam al-Balawi—he killed his enemies, seven CIA agents, while we bolster the confidence of ours.

Huma Abedin was never properly screened, and unless this darling of Hillary Clinton answers some tough questions, the issues we set forth regarding the failure to screen her makes for an ironclad case.

Tina | September 18, 2011 at 12:22 pm |
The issue with Huma’s relatives and their affiliations is of great concern, FS. Hillary seems to be as anti-Israel as OB. We must vote them out in 2012 with a pro-American, pro-Israel candidate.

———————————————————-
hillary has sacrificed our security against a muslim Terrorist attack so that she can have Lesbian Sex with huma.

What is worse than AtackWatch are the boHillary demRats like SueK who infiltrate conservative blogs with personal attacks on anyone who exposes boHillary’s Muslim Brotherhood connections and Lesbian Affairs.

This question was forwarded to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years.
The following is his reply:

Theologically – no. . . . Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon god of Arabia .

Religiously – no.. . . Because no other religion is accepted by His Allah except Islam . (Quran, 2:256)(Koran)

Scripturally – no. . . Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran.

Geographically – no . Because his allegiance is to Mecca , to which he turns in prayer five times a day..

Socially – no. . . Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews .

Politically – no.. . . Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America , the great Satan.

Domestically – no. .. . Because he is instructed to marry four Women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34 )

Intellectually – no. . Because he cannot accept the American
Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.

Philosophically – no. . . . Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran does not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.

Spiritually – no.. . . Because when we declare ‘one nation under God,’ The Christian’s God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in the Quran’s 99 excellent names.

Therefore, after much study and deliberation…. Perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. – – – They obviously cannot be both ‘good’ Muslims and good Americans. Call it what you wish it’s still the truth. You had better believe it. The more who understand this, the better it will be for our country and our future.

The religious war is bigger than we know or understand. ….

Footnote: The Muslims have said they will destroy us from within. SO FREEDOM IS NOT FREE.

THE MARINES WANT THIS TO ROLL ALL OVER THE U.S.

Email friends and family , you had better read this and pay strict attention to this, after working for 4 different Arab companies including the American Arab Chamber of Commerce in Houston, you can bet this is very true , word for word. Please pass this on and help us fight the take over of our country. Mariana

The issue with Huma’s relatives and their affiliations is of great concern, FS. Hillary seems to be as anti-Israel as OB. We must vote them out in 2012 with a pro-American, pro-Israel candidate.

———————————————————
I agree. In light of the reports of hillary’s compromising the Security of the United States to carry on Lesbian Sex with huma, it is clear that hillary is as great a threat to National Security as bo.

Scripturally – no. . . Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran.
************************************
Does anyone remember the Obama speech, in front of the “Greek Pillars”?
I’ll have to find the video, and count, how many were there.

In a July interview with the Salem Radio Network, Gov. Perry said his wife was inspiring him to “get out of his comfort zone” and run for president because she was “disheartened” with the administration “healthcare-wise.”

“Her father is an old country doctor,” Perry said, “and she sees the demise of really quality healthcare and being able to take care of people like they need to be taken care of in this country and the innovations that have occurred in medicine.”

Anita Thigpen Perry, 59, has a bachelor’s degree in nursing from West Texas State University (now West Texas A&M University) and a master’s degree in nursing from the University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio. Texas Tech University’s School of Nursing was renamed in her honor in 2008.

She worked as a nurse for 17 years in numerous settings, including surgery, pediatrics, intensive care administration and teaching. That experience adds credibility to her criticism of the federal healthcare law, a welcome asset for Perry as he struggles to explain why more than a quarter of Texans don’t have health insurance – the highest rate in the nation.

Anita Perry’s childhood was spent “making house calls with her dad,” Texas Tech University Chancellor Kent Hance told The Hill. “Healthcare is a big issue to her and her dad being a doctor – a country doctor – she certainly has a lot of opinions that were formed even at an early age over healthcare.”

Anita Perry has said that her support for immunization stems from years of watching people suffer and die needlessly from preventable diseases. As Texas’s first lady, she has worked with the state’s Department of Health to increase immunization rates and has served as the national chair for childhood immunizations with the March of Dimes, where she volunteers.
One of her top priorities, increasing immunization rates for children.

His most vocal critic on the issue, Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, lost much of her ability to capitalize on the controversy after she suggested the vaccine could cause “mental retardation” – a baseless claim thoroughly rejected just last month by the Institute of Medicine.

Former President Jimmy Carter wants to see Mitt Romney win the Republican nomination and run against President Obama next November.

“I hope he wins,” Carter said of the former Massachusetts governor in a Thursday night interview with MSNBC. “I’m not taking a position, but I would be very pleased to see him win the Republican nomination.”

Carter, a Democrat, added that he thinks Romney would lose in a match up against Obama, and that he supports the president’s re-election.

http://www.pollsb.com/polls/p3584-hillary_clinton_lesbian_sex_scandal_aide_huma_abedin
Amongst those corroborating the story of Hilary’s lesbian affair, is highly respected journalist and author Ron Rosenbaum. In his October 30 article “Shocking Inside DC Scandal Rumor: A Media Ethics Dilemma” Rosenbaum said the Los Angeles Times has a story “wrapped up and ready to go about what is a potentially devastating sexual scandal involving a leading Presidential candidate” and they are currently ’sitting on it’ because the paper can’t decide “the complex ethics of whether and when to run it.”

Although Rosenbaum didn’t name Clinton specifically there is enough evidence that she is in fact the target of his accusation. So what do you think? Hillary Clinton a Lesbian? 1st ever Lesbian president?

I am starting to think the real story behind the breach of b-ho’s pass port files was that he lied and never went to Pakistan in 1981. We have seen before that he just makes things up. B-Ho only brought it up once and never mentioned it again. Weird hunh, kind of like a liar.

Why make the story up ?
He was weak on foreign policy compared to Clinton and Mc Cain.

Is there any evidence that he was ever there ?

Where did the money for the trip come from?

[During the speech, Mr. Obama also spoke about having traveled to Pakistan in the early 1980s. Because of that trip, which he did not mention in either of his autobiographical books, “I knew what Sunni and Shia was before I joined the Senate Foreign Relations Committee,” he said.]

Life Long Democrat liberal Socialist Leo, failed in a Political run against Republicans in Tennessee, recently became a “Constitutionalists Conservative Republican” after Hillary lost to Bo, (all of a sudden)” now claims many things, many of which make absolutely no rational sense. At least, not explainable for reasoning.

But hey, he has been “Reformed” since 2008, right?

Free Speech | September 17, 2011 at 3:48 pm |

“It is now obvious that hillary’s scheme was to replace weiner with her LESBIAN LOVER huma.”

Answer) Well, as one that copies and pastes news site repetitively, over and over again, as if no human being reads, listens, views the daily news, yet makes you special for the most amount of copied repeated links, it is apparent you are obsessed with Lesbian and gay lovers and induce conspiracy theories to thwart off any attempt to expose Obama himself, thus diverting attention.

As all know, Hillary did not attempt to expose Huma, with the intent to replace her husband, politically or otherwise. That is simply just silly. And as of 2 months ago, you would have know that. But again, you apply the Alinsky Tactics of disinformation and diversion of topic.

Leo, as a Tennessee resident for many decades, I am fully aware of your past and political attempts on the Democrat liberal ticket. Did you find God and Constitution all of a sudden in 2008 when your beloved Hillary lost? I doubt it, as you did not stand for it then during your republican bashing. You simply want Obama defeated, for restitution of your poor decisions. Hence, you now claim “Reformed” lifelong Liberal Socialist Democrat. I don’t buy it. You might as well put Ted Kennedy into the same reformed category, for votes and opinions only. Doesn’t work that way, unless one is fickle and deceptive for attention.

Congressman Weiner’s wife is the same woman who worked for Hillary Clinton. Not only that, but the same woman who was long rumored to be having an affair with Hillary amid decades of rumors that HIllary is bi-sexual or a lesbian. Huma (Weiner’s wife) is a Muslim from a strict upbringing, who married a Jew. If Huma and Hillary are indeed lovers, it might explain Weiner’s obsession with women online.

Huma, during her years working for Hillary, traveled with her always and it was said that for a time they shared the same home. Many references have been made to the two women and their strong alliance, as well as the luxurious lifestyle Huma has lived, despite her reported salary of under $10,000 a year. How can a woman making less than minimum wage afford a $700,000 condo, or a vast wardrobe of designer clothes? She is not from a wealthy family, so someone was providing for her lifestyle (and it wasn’t Weiner).

There are now new speculations about those two women. Hillary still harbors a driven desire to be president – a goal she has held for many years. It would not do well for Hillary to be entangled in a lesbian relationship making headlines, and what better way to take the heat and speculation off those two than for Huma to find a husband, if only a faux husband? Otherwise referred to as a ‘beard’ –

There are several media outlets pursuing renewed interest in the 2 women and their relationship, including mainstream media such as LA Times, NY Daily News, Village Voice, and others. There has been a ‘buzz’ about the 2 women since early in 2007 when Huma was with Hillary constantly. But rumors about Hillary date back to before the Clinton’s occupied the White House. It should be noted that when considering the 3-way relationship – each gains in a way that is of special importance to each person – Hillary has a beautiful young woman for sexual favors, and ensures that the young woman has a lavish lifestyle to keep her close. Weiner on the other hand would have tremendous asset in Hillary as president, enabling him to secure his life-long dream of being Mayor of NYC. The triumvirate is all about power, money and sex – and quid pro quo for each.

Hillary is not what she appears, in any regard. She is a CLOSE ally of George Soros (since the earliest days of the Clinton presidency) who was to have put his money on her for the 2008 election, but before the Dem convention decided Obama was a better bet and after losing millions on his backing of John Kerry he was not willing to take another risky bet, since his objective was to control the White House. Hillary also was the head of Soros’ organization that fostered the ‘shadow government’ that became Obama’s Administration – Center for American Progress (an uber-liberal think tank headed by John Podesta — but Hillary has been the behind the scenes leader since the Clintons left the White House up until she became SoS. Podesta was the Clinton Chief of Staff.

On Friday’s NBC Nightly News, correspondent Andrea Mitchell filed a report that reminded viewers of an embarrassing political episode from Hillary Clinton’s past: the controversial hug and kiss she shared with Yasser Arafat’s wife, Suha, during a trip to the West Bank. The NBC correspondent related that Clinton had taken a position favoring a Palestinian state early on

“Last Of A Dying Breed: Investigators Wayne Madsen and Robert S. Finnegan at Obama statue in the courtyard of the public school he attended as an INDONESIAN CITIZEN. It was illegal for ANY foreigner at that time to attend ANY public school, and Madsen now has the Indonesian Law Statues to prove it, along with the documentation to prove Obama’s attendance. So just exactly what WAS Obama’s citizenship when he attended school here?

“VIDEO: PAT BOONE: OBAMA BORN IN KENYA: LONG-FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS A TOTAL FRAUD”

Excerpt:

“On whether [Pat Boone] thinks Obama was born in the U.S: “I don’t. I was in Kenya about a year and a half ago and everybody said, “you know he was born here.”…Why else would he be hiding all his records? He is spending millions of dollars so we do not have his records..And experts have already looked at and been able to verify that this long form document is a fraud.

When you have control of all the major institutions of society, you can call black, white – freedom, slavery and all the people will just follow right along – specially if you give them a piece of paper that certifies that they are now ‘educated’

…………….In spite of strong opposition from within Congress, the Select Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations and Comparable Organizations was formed in April 1952 and turned over to Congressman Carrol Reece of Tennessee. It was this committee that Norman Dodd served as the chief investigator, and it is in that capacity that we now see him at the New York offices of the Ford Foundation.

We are now in the year 1954, and we hear Mr. Gaither say to Mr. Dodd, “Would you be interested in knowing what we do here at the Ford Foundation?” And Mr. Dodd says, “Yes! That’s exactly why I’m here. I would be very interested, sir.” Then, without any prodding at all, Gaither says, “Mr. Dodd, we operate in response to directives, the substance of which is that we shall use our grant making power to alter life in the United States so that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.”

Dodd almost falls off of his chair when he hears that. Then he says to Gaither, “Well, sir, you can do anything you please with your grant making powers, but don’t you think you have an obligation to make a disclosure to the American people? You enjoy tax exemption, which means you are indirectly subsidized by taxpayers, so, why don’t you tell the Congress and the American people what you just told me?” And Gaither replies, “We would never dream of doing such a thing.”

So while we know that Huma Abedin’s parents were devout and observant Muslims — indeed, her father was an imam — we don’t know what exactly is going on with her marriage to Anthony Weiner.

Certainly the most likely scenario is that Weiner did convert to Islam, as Abedin’s mother, a professor in Saudi Arabia, would almost certainly have insisted that he do so. Weiner has made no public statement of this conversion, but since it would almost certainly have cost him politically if he had announced it, this silence is not any indication that he didn’t actually convert.

However, it is also possible, given the recent scandal involving Weiner’s apparently frequent and sexually charged contact with other women, that the rumors that the Abedin/Weiner union is a political marriage of convenience are true. After all, in 2008, Hillary Clinton was running for president. There were widespread insinuations that she was involved in a romantic and/or sexual relationship with Abedin, her ever-present personal assistant. Those whisperings persisted into Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State. Abedin’s 2010 marriage to Weiner, at which Bill Clinton​ presided, put those rumors to rest.

In Islamic law, a Muslim must officiate a marriage ceremony; hence if Bill Clinton was the only one officiating, the marriage was not valid according to Islamic law. Huma Abedin would undoubtedly have known that. Thus, if no Muslim was officiating along with Clinton, Weiner would not have had to convert to Islam, as the whole thing was a charade from the outset, apparently entered into with the full awareness of all parties concerned.

Spencer: Yes, Bill Clinton is a strange choice, indeed — unless the whole point of the union had to do more with the Clinton connection than with faithfulness and loyalty.

FP: According to Islamic Law, Huma Abedin could be killed, right? If the whole thing is not a charade and a trick, it is a bit curious that her family, who are Muslim Brotherhood and Muslim Sisterhood operatives, have allowed this and not punished her, no?

Spencer: Yes, Jamie. If the marriage is not a sham, it is exceedingly strange that Huma Abedin’s mother and other Muslim Brotherhood connections would have no problem with it. She is, of course, a high profile individual in the United States, and thus is in a very different situation from that of a woman in Saudi Arabia who might enter into a relationship with a non-Muslim man. In Saudi Arabia, such a woman would almost certainly be murdered; would Brotherhood operatives murder the aide to the Secretary of State for committing the same sin? That is not so clear.
FP: So, just to crystallize the matter then, there is a remote possibility that Abedin is actually being deceptive in her marriage to Weiner to follow Muslim Brotherhood instructions and to infiltrate the U.S. government, correct?

Spencer: Certainly. That is a very real possibility, and it should be investigated. But the only ones who have the means to do so are mainstream media journalists who are either clueless or complicit.

FP: Omar Abu-Namous, the imam of the Islamic Cultural Center in New York, is encouraging Huma Abedin​ to stand by her husband. Why would an imam support a Muslim wife to stand by a Jewish husband who has disgraced her?

Spencer: Only if he is a Muslim.

FP: Ok, let’s get back to Huma Abedin. Don’t you find it a bit concerning that we have someone with close associations to the Muslim Brotherhood advising our Secretary of State and having access to sensitive information? How come no one in the media is talking about this?

Spencer: Definitely. According to published reports, Abedin is still an observant Muslim, and given her mother’s established ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, which is dedicated in its own words to “eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within,” that is a matter of grave concern.

If the mainstream media were actually interested in reporting the news, journalists would be asking Abedin tough questions not so much about her marriage to Weiner, but about her family’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. They should also be asking Clinton about her knowledge of these ties, and examining Clinton’s record for indications that this influence has been a determining factor in her policy decisions.

Imagine if the personal assistant to the Secretary of State had a personal assistant whose family was deeply involved in the Ku Klux Klan. Do you think the media would be as indifferent to the implications of that?

And so above all, this is a glaring example of how the mainstream media is not doing its job, and is, in fact, failing the American people in neglecting to get the facts about a matter that could have serious implications for our national security. As it is, a woman with extensive ties to an organization dedicated to destroying the United States is the most trusted aide of the Secretary of State

What is worse than AtackWatch are the boHillary demRats who infiltrate conservative blogs with personal attacks on anyone who exposes boHillary’s Muslim Brotherhood connections.
************
Hardly worse, another diversion? Why would you want to divert from CW’s article?

Perry said the United States should oppose the Palestinian bid for statehood at the United Nations “by using our veto in the Security Council and by doing everything we can to weaken support for the unilateral declaration of Palestinian statehood in the General Assembly.”

In addition, he wrote, “The United States must affirm that the precondition for any properly negotiated settlement between Israel and the Palestinian Authority is the formal recognition of the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state behind secure borders.”

Perry will hold a pro-Israel news conference in New York this week to coincide with the Palestinian statehood bid expected Friday, Israel Hayom reported.

Even more disconcerting than Mohamed and Balawi is Secretary of State Hillary Clinton​’s aide and Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin, who has been with Clinton since 1996.

Promoting a moderate Muslim Brotherhood is like promoting “capitalistic communism” to defeat Russia during the Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.​, or even a “pro-Jew Nazism” during World War II. A more current and real-life example is “Chrislam.”

Clinton’s “inclusion policy” has brought in spies, and this is how she plans to soften the Muslim Brotherhood? Clinton’s use of oxymoronic formulas to combat terrorism is worse than the moronic path taken by the likes of Jordanian doctor and double agent Humam al-Balawi—he killed his enemies, seven CIA agents, while we bolster the confidence of ours.

Huma Abedin was never properly screened, and unless this darling of Hillary Clinton answers some tough questions, the issues we set forth regarding the failure to screen her makes for an ironclad case.

Great article on the UN effort by the Palestinians. The US should cut off the funding of the UN and the Palestinians. Of course, the Palestinians were given a state by the UN in 1948. The Arabs chose war, and still do.

Orly Taitz: Update on Hawaii Cases and Her Upcoming Visit to Washington, DC

“WE HAVE CLEAR EVIDENCE OF TREASON COMMITTED”

by Sharon Rondeau

Orly Taitz speaking with Dr. Robert Newman of Christian Coalition at the California Republican Convention on September 17, 2011. Photo credit: George Miller, Ventura County Tea Party

(Sep. 18, 2011) — While en route to the California Republican Convention, Dr. Orly Taitz contacted The Post & Email to provide an update on her two lawsuits filed in Hawaii. One is a state case with a hearing date scheduled for October 12, while the other is federal and has a hearing scheduled for November 21, 2011. Read more.

Two U.S. embassies were bombed on August 7, 1998 in Tanzania and Kenya, respectively, believed to have been carried out by the group Egyptian Islamic Jihad.

(Sep. 18, 2011) — No, seriously, what will it take? We’ve been through the Marine barracks suicide bombing in Lebanon, the Lockerbie plane crash, the embassies in Africa blown to bits, the World Trade Center in 1993, planes flying into things in 2001, Fort Hood and so forth, yet Americans see nothing to be concerned about the Muslims amongst us as more and more arrive daily, some via planes, others sneaking over borders. Americans turn a blind eye to the fact that that our prison system is nothing more than Muslim recruitment centers and remain complete oblivious to the mortal danger that we are putting ourselves in. Read more.

Tina | September 18, 2011 at 7:25 pm |
Great article on the UN effort by the Palestinians. The US should cut off the funding of the UN and the Palestinians.
————————————————————
I agree. That may happen with a Perry Administration.

Perry said the United States should oppose the Palestinian bid for statehood at the United Nations “by using our veto in the Security Council and by doing everything we can to weaken support for the unilateral declaration of Palestinian statehood in the General Assembly.”

In addition, he wrote, “The United States must affirm that the precondition for any properly negotiated settlement between Israel and the Palestinian Authority is the formal recognition of the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state behind secure borders.”

Perry will hold a pro-Israel news conference in New York this week to coincide with the Palestinian statehood bid expected Friday, Israel Hayom reported.

Spencer: So while we know that Huma Abedin’s parents were devout and observant Muslims — indeed, her father was an imam — we don’t know what exactly is going on with her marriage to Anthony Weiner.

Certainly the most likely scenario is that Weiner did convert to Islam, as Abedin’s mother, a professor in Saudi Arabia, would almost certainly have insisted that he do so. Weiner has made no public statement of this conversion, but since it would almost certainly have cost him politically if he had announced it, this silence is not any indication that he didn’t actually convert.

However, it is also possible, given the recent scandal involving Weiner’s apparently frequent and sexually charged contact with other women, that the rumors that the Abedin/Weiner union is a political marriage of convenience are true. After all, in 2008, Hillary Clinton was running for president. There were widespread insinuations that she was involved in a romantic and/or sexual relationship with Abedin, her ever-present personal assistant. Those whisperings persisted into Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State. Abedin’s 2010 marriage to Weiner, at which Bill Clinton​ presided, put those rumors to rest.

In Islamic law, a Muslim must officiate a marriage ceremony; hence if Bill Clinton was the only one officiating, the marriage was not valid according to Islamic law. Huma Abedin would undoubtedly have known that. Thus, if no Muslim was officiating along with Clinton, Weiner would not have had to convert to Islam, as the whole thing was a charade from the outset, apparently entered into with the full awareness of all parties concerned.

Spencer: Yes, Bill Clinton is a strange choice, indeed — unless the whole point of the union had to do more with the Clinton connection than with faithfulness and loyalty.

FP: According to Islamic Law, Huma Abedin could be killed, right? If the whole thing is not a charade and a trick, it is a bit curious that her family, who are Muslim Brotherhood and Muslim Sisterhood operatives, have allowed this and not punished her, no?

Spencer: Yes, Jamie. If the marriage is not a sham, it is exceedingly strange that Huma Abedin’s mother and other Muslim Brotherhood connections would have no problem with it. She is, of course, a high profile individual in the United States, and thus is in a very different situation from that of a woman in Saudi Arabia who might enter into a relationship with a non-Muslim man. In Saudi Arabia, such a woman would almost certainly be murdered; would Brotherhood operatives murder the aide to the Secretary of State for committing the same sin? That is not so clear.

FP: So, just to crystallize the matter then, there is a remote possibility that Abedin is actually being deceptive in her marriage to Weiner to follow Muslim Brotherhood instructions and to infiltrate the U.S. government, correct?

Spencer: Certainly. That is a very real possibility, and it should be investigated. But the only ones who have the means to do so are mainstream media journalists who are either clueless or complicit.

FP: Omar Abu-Namous, the imam of the Islamic Cultural Center in New York, is encouraging Huma Abedin​ to stand by her husband. Why would an imam support a Muslim wife to stand by a Jewish husband who has disgraced her?

Spencer: Only if he is a Muslim.

FP: Ok, let’s get back to Huma Abedin. Don’t you find it a bit concerning that we have someone with close associations to the Muslim Brotherhood advising our Secretary of State and having access to sensitive information? How come no one in the media is talking about this?

Spencer: Definitely. According to published reports, Abedin is still an observant Muslim, and given her mother’s established ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, which is dedicated in its own words to “eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within,” that is a matter of grave concern.

If the mainstream media were actually interested in reporting the news, journalists would be asking Abedin tough questions not so much about her marriage to Weiner, but about her family’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. They should also be asking Clinton about her knowledge of these ties, and examining Clinton’s record for indications that this influence has been a determining factor in her policy decisions.

Imagine if the personal assistant to the Secretary of State had a personal assistant whose family was deeply involved in the Ku Klux Klan. Do you think the media would be as indifferent to the implications of that?

And so above all, this is a glaring example of how the mainstream media is not doing its job, and is, in fact, failing the American people in neglecting to get the facts about a matter that could have serious implications for our national security. As it is, a woman with extensive ties to an organization dedicated to destroying the United States is the most trusted aide of the Secretary of State

Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul is the winner of a straw poll conducted among Golden State Republicans.

The Texas congressman drew large, boisterous crowds of supporters for several speaking appearances at the state party convention under way this weekend at the JW Marriott in downtown Los Angeles. He won roughly 45 percent of the 833 ballots cast.

“I think the main purpose of our Constitution and political action should be the preservation of liberty,” Paul told delegates on Constitution Day.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry, whose supporters also flocked to the poll site en mass, came in second place with 29 percent of the vote.

Trailing the two top picks was former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who secured a distant third place slot with just 9 percent of the votes cast.

Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, who delivered the keynote address to delegates on Friday night, came in fourth place with 7.7 percent of the vote.

I was driving to work the other evening and I saw this car with 5, maybe 6 Ron Paul bumper stickers.

Interested to see who was driving the car, I pulled along side.

Low and behold who was inside? Someone in military uniform.

So for Tina, and others to complain about Paul’s foreign policy positions, KNOWING that the person who gets the most campaign donations from the military and also understanding that the military is the Department tasked with defending our Nation, I think I’ll stand with those who will be the ones putting their lives on the line IF Paul’s foreign policy program is instituted.

You know, I read this blog every day, and I see folks on here treating our election like it’s some kind of popularity contest. The TRUTH is we need to elect the BEST person, not the most popular. We need to elect the person who will do what is BEST for the COUNTRY, and NOT what I think is best for ME.

There are also some people on this blog who need to do some research (as does the President), because we do NOT live in a Democracy, we live in a Constitutional Representative REPUBLIC. The difference between the two is great.

Maybe this will help Tina and others understand our form of Government:

The BIGGEST difference between a Republic and a Democracy is that the majority does NOT rule, as “some” would have you believe. We have a Democratic way of VOTING, but that’s the extent of our Government being a Democracy. Our elected Representatives are SUPPOSED to do what is best for the COUNTRY AS A WHOLE, and not what is best for some segment of society.

You see, THAT’S the problem we have, our Representatives and the President want to make people “happy”, so they can get re-elected. I believe MOST Representatives run for office with honorable goals, but soon find out that the way it works in Washington is NOT what he/she thought, and instead of informing the folks they represent, they simply “go along to get along”.

Some people need to become informed before they comment on here.

Myself, I don’t look at polls to determine who I am going to vote for. I don’t look at a candidate and say, “OH that person is going to win, so I’m voting for him/her”. What I do however, is look at the POLICY positions, and do my best to determine which candidate has the best plan to turn this wandering ship around.

I believe that this could be the most important election of my lifetime (so far anyway), because it’s time for someone to stand up and explain to the American people what kind of mess we are in. The Government admits to being 14 TRILLION dollars in debt, but the TRUTH is we owe MUCH more than that. It’s time for someone, ANYONE to tell the people in a way that we understand, where we are headed.

Perot TRIED to do this back in 92 and 96 to no avail (I voted for Perot BOTH TIMES, and am PROUD to say I did, and by the way, Perot was labeled a “nutjob” also). I’d like to see what shape our Country was in today, if Perot would have been elected.

I don’t care if it’s a third party candidate, or one of the two “major” party’s nominee, I will support the person who has a PLAN to restore this once great Country to it’s rightful place.

If we continue down this road, whether it be at the pace we are currently at, or at a slower pace, we are NOT doing what is best for the COUNTRY AS A WHOLE.

I was driving to work the other evening and I saw this car with 5, maybe 6 Ron Paul bumper stickers.

Interested to see who was driving the car, I pulled along side.

Low and behold who was inside? Someone in military uniform.

So for Tina, and others to complain about Paul’s foreign policy positions, KNOWING that the person who gets the most campaign donations from the military and also understanding that the military is the Department tasked with defending our Nation, I think I’ll stand with those who will be the ones putting their lives on the line IF Paul’s foreign policy program is instituted.

You know, I read this blog every day, and I see folks on here treating our election like it’s some kind of popularity contest. The TRUTH is we need to elect the BEST person, not the most popular. We need to elect the person who will do what is BEST for the COUNTRY, and NOT what I think is best for ME.

There are also some people on this blog who need to do some research (as does the President), because we do NOT live in a Democracy, we live in a Constitutional Representative REPUBLIC. The difference between the two is great.

Maybe this will help Tina and others understand our form of Government:

The BIGGEST difference between a Republic and a Democracy is that the majority does NOT rule, as “some” would have you believe. We have a Democratic way of VOTING, but that’s the extent of our Government being a Democracy. Our elected Representatives are SUPPOSED to do what is best for the COUNTRY AS A WHOLE, and not what is best for some segment of society.

You see, THAT’S the problem we have, our Representatives and the President want to make people “happy”, so they can get re-elected. I believe MOST Representatives run for office with honorable goals, but soon find out that the way it works in Washington is NOT what he/she thought, and instead of informing the folks they represent, they simply “go along to get along”.

Some people need to become informed before they comment on here.

Myself, I don’t look at polls to determine who I am going to vote for. I don’t look at a candidate and say, “OH that person is going to win, so I’m voting for him/her”. What I do however, is look at the POLICY positions, and do my best to determine which candidate has the best plan to turn this wandering ship around.

I believe that this could be the most important election of my lifetime (so far anyway), because it’s time for someone to stand up and explain to the American people what kind of mess we are in. The Government admits to being 14 TRILLION dollars in debt, but the TRUTH is we owe MUCH more than that. It’s time for someone, ANYONE to tell the people in a way that we understand, where we are headed.

Perot TRIED to do this back in 92 and 96 to no avail (I voted for Perot BOTH TIMES, and am PROUD to say I did, and by the way, Perot was labeled a “nutjob” also). I’d like to see what shape our Country was in today, if Perot would have been elected.

I don’t care if it’s a third party candidate, or one of the two “major” party’s nominee, I will support the person who has a PLAN to restore this once great Country to it’s rightful place.

If we continue down this road, whether it be at the pace we are currently at, or at a slower pace, we are NOT doing what is best for the COUNTRY AS A WHOLE.
*************************
Very well stated. Thank you Sir.
Remember all, we still have plenty of time for more credible candidates to appear.