“As great and inspiring as David’s story is, it’s not a triumph of the system. It’s a triumph despite the system,” he said. “We can’t pretend that the system did anything right in this case whatsoever.”

“The Canadian Justice department is failing, and it is failing miserably,” Milgaard said.

Drawing from his own experience, he described systemic bias against those who maintain their innocence, and who are often denied parole for refusing to admit guilt.

He spoke on the need for an independent review board to investigate potential miscarriages of justice in Canada and to help protect and exonerate the wrongfully convicted.

He also suggested that the Canadian government implement other, non-punitive justice models, like restorative justice.

Restorative justice emphasizes active dialogue between victims and offenders and encourages offenders to take responsibility for their actions.

Julia O’Byrne, of Innocence McGill – an organization dedicated to investigating wrongful conviction claims in Quebec – pointed out systemic problems like prosecutorial power and the widespread use of plea bargains, which can incentivize false confessions from innocent people afraid of harsher sentences imposed by a jury.

“Nobody can ever see what kind of negotiations the Crown is offering, what the plea negotiations are like, yet they wield so much power…. They’re not held accountable,” she told The Daily.

Edwards also spoke about the plight of First Nations peoples within the criminal justice system, who often give false confessions, believing the system will work against them.

Rilla Banks, also of Innocence McGill, noted a disparity between statist understandings of justice and those of First Nations peoples.

“Within Aboriginal communities, many of them have different modes of dealing with people that commit crimes in their community. It’s much less adversarial than the [federal] system,” she told The Daily. “I think that if you’re not informed about the system, and you don’t feel that you’re part of it, you wouldn’t want to cooperate with it.”

Comments posted on The McGill Daily's website must abide by our comments policy.A change in our comments policy was enacted on January 23, 2017, closing the comments section of non-editorial posts. Find out more about this change here.