Search This Blog

Scott Pruitt is a Bad Man

March 13, 2017 - Raise your hand if winter weather where you live has been abnormal. Here in the Pacific Northwest we have had record-setting amounts of rain. 2017 has been one of
the fastest starting years on record in terms of the tornado count, which currently stands at 301 confirmed tornadoes. There is an historic blizzard taking place in the northeastern US as I write.

When you see words like "record setting" and "historic," think climate change. Otherwise, there is no change; events fall within an average range, established over decades or centuries. The events and patterns just described fall outside that range; they are therefore symptomatic of climate change. Every passing year gets warmer - and worse, by which I mean the damage done by storms measured in dollars, and the number of injuries or deaths caused by storms.

The warmer temperatures occur at night, by the way. Yes, daytime temperatures may also be hellishly hot, but they aren't at the cutting edge. It's nighttime temperatures that are jumping off the charts, and have been. For decades. Here in the PNW, another interesting measure might be the number of landslides caused by the overabundance of rain. Warmer air holds more moisture, and since wet places will get wetter (that's us), and dry places will get drier, another pattern to watch for.

And speaking of drought, forests around the world are at risk of death due to widespread drought. My husband and I saw this first hand in Yosemite last year. Forest fires are increasing globally. Without trees, we'll have a devil of a time stabilizing carbon dioxide levels. Too much CO2 means a planet that's too warm to sustain life. And that makes me think of Scott Pruitt.

To wit: the aforementioned chucklehead, now head of the EPA, maintains that "measuring with precision human activity [should read "human activity's effects"] on the climate is something very challenging to do and there's tremendous [sic] disagreement about the degree of impact, so no, I would not agree that it's a primary contributor to the global warming that we see." There is not tremendous disagreement about impact. For while 300 scientists urged that Trump withdraw from the Paris Accord, over 2,000 other scientists signed the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2014 report, which describes page after page of mounting damage done by climate change.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Friends - Today - January 18 - is the day to take action against PIPA/SOPA, two bills being introduced in both houses of Congress that will legalize internet censorship. Go
to senate.gov and house.gov and make your opposition known. Thank you!

March 20, 2017 - Happy Spring, everybody. Today's post will be brief: the ten-year average for number of wildfires during January through mid-March is 8,687 fires that burned 216,894 acres per year in the United States. This year there have been 10,829 fires during that period, burning 2,062,012 acres. You read that right.

April 2, 2017 - The following was sent to me by Credo by email today. Please read and take action:
Stunning new documents unsealed by a federal judge suggest that Monsanto worked directly with federal regulators to hide the health risks of and manipulate the science behind its best-selling herbicide, RoundUp.
The documents reveal that Monsanto pressured Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials to not
publicly release information on the cancer risks of glyphosate, the main ingredient in RoundUp, ghost-
wrote research for the EPA and worked with a senior official at the agency to quash a federal review of
the chemical. These documents suggest an unprecedented level of collusion between the EPA and Monsanto to cover up evidence that RoundUp is a likely carcinogen. The Office of Inspector General of the
EPA, an independent office tasked with investigating fraud and abuse in the agency, must immediately
launch an investigation to hold Monsanto and all EPA employees involved accounta…