Archive for the 'Uncategorized' Category

A friend strongly opposed to immigration but explained his position and it seemed racism free to me.

He said it simply wasn’t fair. When he was young, nobody ever advised/told him that the future economy would involve large numbers of people from other countries freely being allowed to work and live in the UK, and with English being the lingua franca, these migrants from a young age very early on were exposed to English and and learned it well enough for it to be a non-problem with work and life in the UK. Neither did anyone tell him that he should learn a few foreign languages, so that later on in life he too could migrate to an EU country and work without any language barrier. Now it’s too late. He feels that he is too old to acquire the ability to learn and he feels he wouldn’t like to learn. Even if he did manage to learn one, because he’d be moving to a smaller jobs-market country, it would naturally be a lot harder to get a decent job there anyway, and at the same time the jobs market in the UK is also more difficult because of the number of people chasing those jobs. He’s also not happy that he was never given any say in the matter of the free movement of people He said what was signed up for in the 70’s bears little was resemblance to today. The “lower economy” countries (from which most immigrants come, e.g. Poland) were never part of the “Common Market” then; It was the ‘high economy’ counties that the EEC.

Why would he be forced to live in a different culture with different unpleasant weather when he’s happy with established/traditional)English culture (and it’s weather)? Why should he placed in a position whereby any children he had might not get as good an education overseas. Same for health care provision and so on. If indeed he had to work overseas, why must he have to choose from ‘lessrrer universities’ or health service, sports facilities, watching cricket or the league team of his choice. Why should he simply lay down and accept all the imposiitions the EU is forcing upon him. Why can’t he be allowed to just be the way he was.

I found his points very worthy of sympathy and I could understand very well why he wanted greater immigration control and it didn’t seem racist at all, but that’s the way pro-Brexiters were usually portrayed – as racist insular biggots who simply didn’t like foreigners in the UK. I must admit, those thoughts crossed my mind too once in a while.

A family member voted for Brexit too, saying they disagreed with the EU greavy train.

So, although Brexit is over a year old already, don’t see all Brexiteers as racist bigots.

With prophylaxis in mind, I decided to see how formerly Christian countries, e.g. UK, are handling the LGBT “gay” issue, because make no mistake, it’s coming to societies that live under Islamic principles too.

So I was thrilled to bits at coming across this speaker Lynette Burrows speaking at the Gay Rights Debate at the Oxford Union. Do please watch the whole debate from the beginning (see link to whole playlist at the end) to better appreciate this post.

Lynette’s refusal to be a sheep on the matter and her awesome calling out of the many of the sheep in the audience thrilled me to bits. I totally admire such people, for the same reason I utterly admire the Adamic prophets.

She said “I despite the fact that you all punch the air [in support of] something that 20-30 years ago you’d have punched the air in the opposite direction. All sodomites are wicked, damn them, imprison them”. Those condemnations were of course Lynette saying would have been the accompanying air-punching chant those decades ago]

The sheep seemingly decided to deliberately recast this being what THEY would have been saying in the past, to being a stand alone statement of Lynette said.

She had said in prior to that:
“Come on, come on, come on… group think!
I even despise you all for being in the same cart.”

“You’re just group thinkers, all of you” she said a bit later on, which was amply proved near the end when she (to paraphrase) appealed to the audience to think of your role of your mother in your life, even is she was a slut. The room erupted with laughter, due to the the ‘group-think’ that had already set in early on in Lynette’s turn. You see, Lynette was “outrageous” (read unafraid of ‘fitting in’ ergo independently minded) so no need to take what she say with any seriousness at all. She persisted and the of course did make a great point, the importance of your mother even is she did really bad things. I doubt any of the group-think people laughing would have the sense to reflect on this and see their own bad behaviour..

Lynette’s small part in the debate was a powerful demonstration of the ridiculous sheep like mentality amongst others, and also some of the pathetic attempts to give so called “science” (faux science, “social science”) to be an authoritative voice on the matter.

Unfortunately, in the Islamic context, those who supposedly speak out for Islam, are suffering from ever growing cowardice as they astoundingly actually embrace creeping anti-religious, oxymoronic liberalism, a soulless hegemony, which were are endlessly advertised into thinking it’s so cool. There are already “Imams” who conduct homosexual “marriages”.

In the main, it’s a religious affair. You either obey the prescriptions of your Lord or you don’t. Rationality and scientism has very little to do with it, although it’s entirely possible those two things could be uncovered. Because LGBT is predominantly a religious issue, then if you are NOT religious then of course LGBT won’t appear so bad, and I guess (although I don’t personally like this) if you also like in a non-religious society and choose a religions free life then you can do whatever the hell you like being mindful of the prohibitions that your religion-free society does have.

Wow. What a crazy time. The “IS” variants springing up all over the place – except evil shitty Israyhell of course.

And the sadistic bastards go around burning people alive in cages, drowning them in cages, cutting out and eating their hearts, throwing people from tall buildings, sawing off peoples heads on the beach. Utterly utterly perverse. I think the whole world will cheer when that particular phenomenon is crushed – except for evil shitty Israyhell of course.

The mentally pervertes mad evil terrorist, Seifeddine Rezgui is said to have been trained in Libya (although just how they knew that is surprising) . Now I wonder how that happened? Remember the BS about why the stinking Coalition of the Killing had to attack? Bringing a stable country into ruin, but not evil shitty Israyhell of course who steals more land and Satanises the Palestinian population while thieving their land.

A younger Mubarak tyrant sitting in Egypt – Everything the people protested for completely wasted.

Yemen being bombed. Thickhead Sunni’s (I guess) killing Shia left right and centre – but not doing anything in evil shitty Israyhell of course.

The world digging itself into an even greater catastrophe with global QE.

No prosecution of the Mavi Mamara assassinations. And acts of war (or piracy at the very least) by militarily taking over a humanitarian aid boat in international waters.

Organ harvesting.

Perverse Zionist “legal” system protected thos who fire artillery shells on people on the beach.

Child paedophilia by one of the UK’s leading political Zionists, Greville Janner.

So there are some people who are ruling stuff out, namely: Biden, WSJ and Poroshenko.

And about 2 hours after the plane was shot down, that filthy evil zionist israyhell launches its latest genocidal wave of blitzkrieg against the people of Gaza.

No surprises for what the BBC gives priority too.

Was MH370 ‘disappeared’ to hyper-sensitize the Malaysian and other peoples to this latest awful fate?I really believe Malaysia’s strings are being pulled and Malaysia with so little experience of the dirty evil of Zionism and it’s chief defenders, the US and UK, that really it’s helpless.

The political implications of this are massive.

Now more than ever does zionism need crushing. I think the only way to do that is to attack it financially. That means people of good conscious must NOT use the financial “services” of western banks and other smart moves like this.

Brasil, Россия, भारत, 中国 and South Africa are to create their own reserve/development bank.

It seems like many who oppose the domineering ‘western’ world hegemony, and want to see it end, will applaud this move which is said to pose a challenge to the IMF and World Bank (and probably make inroads into the realm of the Bank of International Settlements).

This isn’t a unique phenomenon. For example Russian military hardware often gets utterances of awe and beauty while instantly dismissing – in their expert opinion – the F-35 as junk. This even extends to the point where Russian women are held up as being more beautiful than western women.

What I’m saying here, is that when people who have thankfully managed to blow away the western smoke-screen of self-promotional guff, to see the awful reality underneath, then these people have a tendency to automatically jump into the opposing camp, even though really it is just a parallel of what it is they hate.

There are many examples from many walks of life. You sometimes see it in Islam too. People whose hearts have switched on to Islam, get manipulated by some group that want’s to advance its own agenda and in the guise of ‘learning new information and/or new ways of thinking, can end up making these people trying to switch off other peoples hearts by killing them [I advise all new Muslims never to join one of these ‘groups’ – advise they are of course free to ignore].

Microfinance is the same. “Oh, those nasty nasty BIG banks. They are so mean denying loans (usury!) to the poor, hence keeping them poor. Hooray for Muhammad Yunus!” – Yeah great, envelop the poor in usury and charge them massive levels of interest.

It is a mental (political) bipolarism, and it seems detrimental to our own humanity; a version of “Four legs good, two legs bad“; heads I win tails you lose.

The way to oppose the filth that’s grabbed the planet by the gonads is not to fall for the good cop – bad cop routine.

So in my eyes, there is little to cheer about this new BRICS ban, which to quote the BBC says:

“One of the goals for the bank – whose creation has been discussed for some time – would be to increase the amount of money loaned to developing countries to help with infrastructure projects”

Hummm… lending (doubtlessly on interest) to developing countries to help with infrastructure projects. I’ve heard that method somewhere before.

I read an article once (which I am so gutted that I never recorded the URL) that tried to estimate the number of paedophiles in the UK, based on crime statistics [I think the investigators might have run some in-depth articles about child p in the Independent or something] . I think it said something like 60,000 were convinced but that reflected only an estimated 10% conviction rate, which, if you choose to believe that to 90% who ‘got off’ were actually guilty (yes, I know, that’s a very ‘dangerous’ thing to do), then that means the actual level of child paedophiles is 600,000 which is about 1% of the UK population.

“Good to see that at least ONE politician has some sort of conscience about openly investigating these horrendous crimes”

But I think that praise is far too generous. I would like to reply on Ian’s blog, but I always have difficulty in posting there, so I’ll vent my opinion here:

“some sort of conscience” – a pretty corruptible/intimidateable one, verging to the point of irrelevance. If he has information about it – to the point where he previously threatened to say the persons name in parliament, then isn’t he covering up a crime and hence guilty of a crime himself? Same for Edwina Curry the slapper.

I have to say, over the years I have become almost totally disbelieving that what gets through the media isn’t made to go through for a purpose. I mean, I find it incredibly hard to believe that the groundswell against child rapists/soddomists/snuffers/torturers has come about without the nod and wink of someone within the establishment.

Is it a ‘pressure’ game so that those being manipulated play ball in these crucial times?
Who knows? But what we do know is that “important” people involved with this are going to get off scott free and some scruffy loner will get the can.

To the BBC which claims impartiality/neutrality, as uncannily does “fair and balanced” FOX News, the Zionist macabre love of killing Palestinians is only ever mentioned in terms of Palestinian “militants” killed or “Israeli strikes” – and here we get to the crux – in retaliationto rocket fire.

Over the lst few days especially, the BBC has always made it out as though Zionist Israel only responds to violence by the Palestinians as first aggressors. Claims that are of course ridiculous.

Zionists are always the defenders, never the seeders of death and destruction.

Aah, the fabled Zionist reality inversion strikes again.

It is incredible that the BBC’s pro Zionist bias has been exposed very well over the last decade or so yet it has provided no change at all and the BBC cum BBZ continues to pump out the utter lies and distortions again and again.

I remember some time back George Galloway said words to the effect of: If an Iraqi whose family had been killed by bliar’s lies retaliated and tried to kill Bliar or his family, then it would be justified.

Similarly, I think one could make a case for legitimacy of a victim of the BBC’s propaganda to attack the BBC given its contributory role in the gross oppression and suffering of various peoples across the world, including Palestinians, Arabs and Persians – especially Muslims ones in particular or even Russians.

In fact that logic was used by Clinton and bLiar when NATO attacked a TV station in the former Yugoslavia.

Oh how I look forward to the passing of the BBC Newz (“Newz” because it certainly ain’t ‘News’). But it will always go on, won’t it? Because it’s purpose is to serve the nauseating pro-Zionist British establishment, britain is the mother of Zionist entity known as Israel.