“The main thrust of the subsequent research is that traditional masculinity — marked by stoicism, competitiveness, dominance and aggression — is, on the whole, harmful,” reads the news release by the famed association.

The “masculinity ideology” is defined by the APA as “a particular constellation of standards that have held sway over large segments of the population, including: anti-femininity, achievement, eschewal of the appearance of weakness, and adventure, risk, and violence.”

>The “masculinity ideology” is defined by the APA as “a particular constellation of standards that have held sway over large segments of the population, including: anti-femininity, achievement, eschewal of the appearance of weakness, and adventure, risk, and violence.”

They don't understand what feminine is. Masculine man are not anti-feminine.

The Jews are literally trying to neuter men now. Competitiveness, dominance and aggression are the very traits that GET SHIT DONE! Without men constantly trying to out do one another our buildings won't get taller, cars won't get faster, cities won't be as grand, etc.

All part of the plan I guess. The slow kill. Fuck with the diet, spread a bunch of feminizing chemicals, then sloooowly make being a "man" offensive. Reduce birthrates (by feminization) then import as much 3rd world shitskin seed, and BAM. A nice population of stupid, complacent goyim.

Friendly reminder that this isn't real psychology, the entire field got taken over by hippies and fags in the 1970's through force, blackmail and aggression, they would attack researchers at conventions and smear them on the press. Freud for all the hate he gets considered gays and lesbians to be a disease and spent a chunk of his career trying to find a solution. Most of the pseudo-psychologists that rule the APA today consider freud to be a patriarchal shitlord and would gladly erase him from history if they could. If he was alive he would probably be diagnosed with this “masculinity ideology” bullshit.

I can also confirm. Me and my father were just discussing this last night after some "psychologist" gave his analysis on some right wing activists. He was complaining how the entire field has been co-opted by the left. He has a Ph.D. and actually meet Timothy Leary during his time at UCSF.

How can psychologists get it this wrong? It has to be intentional malice towards men. They either completely misunderstand men’s nature, needs, and potential. Or they fully understand it and instead want to weaken men so that society can be more female dominated in some kind of kike sci-fi fantasy.

The actual destruction of men’s mental wellness comes from:

>lack of meaningful brotherhoods throughout the lifespan

>lack of meaningful bond with their father and other positive male mentors

>Policies that devalue working class labor mostly done by men

Everything else is a symptom of the destruction of these norms that inhibit natural male community and bonds. The feminine Psychologists focus on symptoms rather than root causes for dysfunction because their actual goal is to weaken men’s role in decision making in the family, government, and the work place.

Ignore these satanic bitches. Improve yourself and men around you in solidarity. Kikes cannot compete when white men act as brothers who strive for strength and power in the world.

On the same token people can say that astrology is based on science, since those celestial objects are very real and so is time, and they use this basis on scientific fact to make up a lot of unproven claims about people.

>Many lay persons and professionals believe that child sexual abuse (CSA) causes intense harm, regardless of gender, pervasively in the general population. The authors examined this belief by reviewing 59 studies based on college samples. Meta-analyses revealed that students with CSA were, on average, slightly less well adjusted than controls. However, this poorer adjustment could not be attributed to CSA because family environment (FE) was consistently confounded with CSA, FE explained considerably more adjustment variance than CSA, and CSA-adjustment relations generally became nonsignificant when studies controlled for FE. Self-reported reactions to and effects from CSA indicated that negative effects were neither pervasive nor typically intense, and that men reacted much less negatively than women. The college data were completely consistent with data from national samples. Basic beliefs about CSA in the general population were not supported.

To be honest, he did lay the concepts unto which Jung built upon and made an actual workable system. Freud relied upon fixed axioms to describe the psychological phenomenon, which is it's terribly unscientific factor, but Jung relativized these in order to make universally appliable ie.reproduceable methods to analyze the psyche.

Freud, amongst jewish intelectuals, is one that have contributed the most, alongside the likes of Bohr, even though he is completely outdated and surpassed nowadays. Not to mention the parts of his research that are undeniably subversive…

Tucker Carlson thinks that marijuana causes psychosis too since he doesn't have a valid argument against banning it. Had some quack on the other night. It's not just the left that does it, the (((right))) does too. It's more about kikery.

The problem with attempts to use the scientific method in psychological research is the vast amounts of contributing factors to human nature. It's impossible to construct a scientific experiment that controls for everything that contributes to whatever it is that you're observing. Research in psychology is plagued by huge amounts of confirmation bias, as the researchers attribute the effects that they observe to whatever they want (and/or believe) it to be. As they fail to control for other factors, the effects are perceived to be a lot bigger than they might in fact be. This is part of why there's such a replication problem in the field - different researchers draw different conclusions from the same data… on top of the already mentioned problem of multiple contributing factors to phenomena.

Furthermore, the whole field is filled with women and men with a very idealistic view of people. They're drawn to the field because they have are very much caring and nurturing people. They're very much afraid to step on the toes of anyone, resulting in a very lenient attitude as to what is pathological. There's nothing 'wrong' with anybody, because that would mean certain people would take offense. Can't have that. Same goes for anything related to biology or evolution. Such topics are avoided, because they imply that part of what makes us who we are can't be changed, can't be blamed on the environment. The idealistic view that these people possess leads them to prefer environmental factors, because such factors doesn't point to any inherent flaw in the individual.

Except if those individuals are masculine, toxic, men perpetuating ideas that goes against their own ideology. Being social constructionists, they believe that such views propagate in the environment as opposed to something we're born with, something innate and shaped by evolution. If we only could remove those attitudes, ban them if necessary, they'll disappear and we will arrive in a utopia where everyone is nice to each other and everyone will prosper.

This entirely flawed view of masculinity is the consequence of avoiding certain factors influencing human nature because they're 'unfair'. These ideas are then spread and taught to psychology students, who don't know any better than to take them for gospel. Literal indoctrination, aversion to Truth, motivated by the belief that we can shape human nature by controlling the environment.

I've spent the last 4 years surrounded by these naive people. It's a shame because the field is full of very interesting research, which is avoided in favour of ideological ideas without any basis in science. The most scary thing is that many of these people will make life worse for their future clients.

The current scientific method lacks a need for archived evidence that experiments even took place in the manner described, and the lack of requirement for archived peer review before being referenced as fact in other work is an atrocious flaw. We see this most fully exploited in the social sciences, but it occasionally pops up in biochemistry now as well because of pharma/food corps.

Is a Jew run Institute aimed to destroy the mental capabilities of humans by transforming them into slaves by destroying their self-esteem and creating drugs as a way to 'cope'. It's also aimed to model contemporary society to mirror Sodom & Gomorra, by progressing society towards tolerating, accepting and protecting gays, pedophiles and worse.

pls, remind us how evolution is real but magically stop applying to humans.

the only people on the "right" who have a problem with this are religious nuts in the US.

meanwhile ALL leftists, WORLDWIDE, are litterally shitting their pants when you start laying bricks about subhumans being what they are precisely because of evolution, and that there is no amount of edukamashun that can make up for 10's and 100's of thousand of years of evolution.

APA was never something to be proud of, but the cucking is complete.This is why we opposed mainstreaming faggotry in the 90's. You fight degenerates, because they are looking to be stopped. They will create whatever behavior provokes and annoys until they are stopped. They crave being stopped because in their heart they know they are sick.

Freud is one of THE chief reasons for this. He and other Jewish subverters that came out of the Frankfurt school were at the forefront of this field with the aim of destroying our peoples righteousness and connection to God and to promote a way to fight "antisemitism". Psychoanalysis was used as a tool of corruption to turn sin into virtue. Homosexuality being one of these vices.

Everyone needs to see this E. Michael Jones video on the origins of psychoanalysis in "The Goy Guide to World History". He details all of these topics:

Correction: the Rational Male is a careful hunter who looks ahead to his survival and what must be done to ensure it. But he does not content himself with mere subsistence but works towards conquering his environment and escaping the grasp of survival.

You (I assume a 'Rational' 'Female') are a vacuous retard who's value will be expended the moment she can no longer moisten her gash. Why not aspire to more than a parasite?

He comes to my university occasionally to preach about how people who smoke weed and gay people will go to hell. He used to wear a shirt with signs informing them that they provoke rape and proceeded to inform every woman who walked by wearing shorts, or showing skin that she deserved to be raped.

Recently he started uploading his preachings to youtube on this channel

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCN6xsYI9yFt4ZhVU6cxmeag

Keep in mind he tones down his actions and words when he records himself so it is not nearly as intense as when other people film him. He frequents universities in southern california and arizona, but was suspended from preaching on several campuses, including the one I attend, for punching a student in the face. His crusades are relentless, and he has persecuting the gays, potheads, roasties, masturbators, and commies for far longer than I have been attending university.

APA has been a political organization from the start. Another fun fact is that they consider premature ejaculation,and delayed ejaculation to be disorders, but being exclusively attracted to the same sex is perfectly normal and healthy

He didn't break shit. It's near impossible to "program" people (in this case the girl) into going against their natural sexual desires. For women it would be tall, strong, assertive men with masculine features. She is just bad at hiding it, assuming she tries to do so to begin with.

We've been hiding for millennium when times got beyond hope. Those whites that didn't or couldn't became Slavs or mixes breeds (southern Europe) Some we so free so long from fear that they lost the understanding of fear(Swedes)

The stoicism of masculinity/barrenness is grounded in the fact that men and barren women exist without the safety net of society, and also without its kindness. Therefore, there is rightfully total alienation from that whore machine.

>particular constellation of standards that have held sway over large segments of the population, including: anti-femininity, achievement, eschewal of the appearance of weakness, and adventure, risk, and violence.”

I am fucked I had to take a psychological evaluation years ago I put family-oriented answers they said on my possibly grew up in a overprotective family and I am just emulating my parents

Astronomy and Astrology are the two original sciences of mankind. They are based on opposite epistemology:

1. Astronomy which is the mother of all modern sciences, analyzes the past. You find and measure objects to understand how the world works, so you can predict what's going to happen later: be it a moon eclipse, or a viral outbreak, or an economic collapse.

2. Astrology which is the mother of all religions, analyzes the future. You look for signals of what's going to happen, either as messages from those responsible (stars, gods, energies) or using inverted causality devices like rituals, crystal balls (generators of randomness, which can be tuned to the future).

I HAVE BEEN SAYING FOR AWHILE NOW THAT PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY IS ULTIMATELY MENTAL CASTRATION OF PEOPLE AND I HAVE BEEN BLAMING PSYCHIATRY FOR THE NEUTERING OF MEN. IT'S NOT THE FAULT OF WOMEN OR FEMINISM FOR MEN BECOMING "FEMINIZED", AS SCREWED UP AS FEMINISM CAN BE. IT'S THE FAULT OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEM.

You know ironically, L Ron Hubbard hated Psychology as well. I kind of wonder if he tried to go against them in his own way with his new religon, although to be fair he was bat shit insane to begin with

The word psychology derives from Greek roots meaning study of the soul. It was a branch of philosophy (metaphysics) that became nominalised and turned into a "science". Now it is what can be called empirical psychology, as opposed to rational psychology, which is an oxymoron. Its problem is, you can't scientifically study something that is metaphysical or at least something that isn't truly empirically observable. You can only study behaviours and cognitive function through various tests that attempt to measure, with varying degrees of success, how well minds interact with it. That's why we see psychology producing so little of value – and in fact, half of all studies in psychology can't be reproduced. The people in that field make up stuff to stay employed. If you want a good book on psychology to learn about it, search for Psychology Empirical and Rational by Michael Maher, a Catholic monk who fought in the WW1. It was written in 1901 and therefore contains no poz.

You have to stop believing these people have noble intentions. The goal of trying to make masculinity a mental disorder is to make it possible for women to compete in male spaces. Women cannot emulate men, men will always beat women in fields which best suit male qualities. Say for business in particular, men are less agreeable and more competitive. You have a man and woman doing the same thing, but the man, being competitive, will work harder, faster and more aggressively to get what he wants. In order to enforce equality, they have to lobotomize him so a less productive woman can possibly get in edgewise.

It's evil social engineering and nothing more or less. Don't think of them as good people with noble intentions. Crush them. Destroy them. Do not pity them.

What they dont get due to their profession or the general blunt assumption is that, the male drive is indeed harmful to society if it doesnt find a clear productive path. What i can only speculate about is that they see the drive in itself harmful, which is idiotic. Male drive is pretty simple: Put in effort, focus and dicipline get stuff worthwhile. Really simple.

Guy in the middle is Chad AF. Not just his public bravery but look at that stance. That is the stance of a king. That is a serious beard, thick and well groomed. Champion hair, well styled.

Look at everyone around him. Look at the absolute subhuman on the furthest left. Now look at the girl on the furthest right. She looks like she's ready to have his kids any second now. Girl just to her left looks like she's conflicted between wanting his kids and being angry at him.

Every male in the picture looks like a highschool kid at best, but from the context of the picture this is probably a Uni campus. Every single male in the picture aside from King looks like they've had their masculine development stunted and they're still children.

Look at the girls in the middle, the only ones who look actually angry and not just amused. An assortment of mystery meat, diesel dykes and apes.

This image is amazing, I could write a paper on this significance of just this image alone, and represents everything you're talking about.

Liberal democracy is the victory of quantity over quality. There's a horde of soyboys, diesel dykes, white girls with daddy issues and apes swarming the king. They think he's a sideshow, a novelty, because they've never even seen a real man before. We can be the last men, and the whole world can be ours if we want it.

Noble intentions are rationalizations as far as I'm concerned. Everyone is unconciously driven by a natural desire to prolong and advance their own bloodline. Oftentimes, individuals will see mutual goals as a vehicle for their own success, and declare the goals of such groups noble. Women siding with feminism is doing it of self-interest, not for the noble cause. Claiming it to be a noble cause is itself done in self-interest - enhancement of social appreciation => bigger chances of individual success.

Same goes for us here; the current power structures are seen by us as a hindrance to our own bloodlines. As a result we work against them.

Naturally, the ones at the top of the pyramid knowingly manipulate the masses to perceive their schemes as noble, though themselves they know it to be a deception made to further their own power. The majority are unknowingly used as pawns, but often themselves believe that what they are fighting for is a noble cause. Through discussion, some these pawns can be made to see the folly in their endeavour and be turned away from what they previously knew to be true. It is true that many are too blind to see reason, but I hesitate to categorize them as evil.

Adam's chief sin was his effeminacy in failing to execute his authority and duties; to endorse effeminacy is literally as satanic as it gets. Remember to explain that to progressive "Christians" whose doctrine falls apart on Genesis.

The guy on the left looks up the guy in the middle. And the girl on the right really wants his dick.

Also intelligence is a great factor, too bad you are all balloons. If i take a needle then you burst. And there is no substance, the feminals naturall see that substance, they naturally see that they dont get hurt and they naturally see the potential within.

Your liberal males are nothing like that they are like bent trees, their only virtue is being ascetic.

It should also be noted that the scientific method requires that facts be replicable, and that many things in the field of psychology have already been discredited for not being replicable, such as much of Freud's work. Related to this are cases where psychological findings cannot legally be replicated because people like the APA have deemed that the study was unethical to begin with, such as the Stanford prison experiment, and it really makes you wonder why the powers that be would want to prevent anyone from verifying the things that Zimbardo and his students learned through their study. What is the APA trying to hide by claiming the experiment was crap, but then refusing to accept anyone who wishes to scrutinise it and try to prove it legitimate or not? That isn't the only such example and it certainly isn't the best, but it's probably one of the more commonly known and/or notorious examples of the elites (((shutting down))) a psychology experiment that threatens to reveal something contrary to a greater narrative.

Some experiments are outright unethical, Minnesota semistarvation experiment while not conducted as a psychological study, did observe what happened to starved minds. This is also how they faked the holocaust aka Auschwitz mode.

No one takes Freud seriously. Are you just repeating your programming? Freud is presented during intro to psychology courses as part of the history of the discipline and as an example of what nonscientific psychology looks like. He is not presented as a role model or authority.

>you won't let me replicate really fucked up studies, what are you hiding!?

Really?

>"That isn't the only such example and it certainly isn't the best, but it's probably one of the more commonly known and/or notorious examples of the elites (((shutting down))) a psychology experiment that threatens to reveal something contrary to a greater narrative."

Citation needed.

It's like you're just regurgitating talking points that come from someone who doesn't have any idea of what they're talking about.

>The “masculinity ideology” is defined by the APA as “a particular constellation of standards that have held sway over large segments of the population, including: anti-femininity, achievement, eschewal of the appearance of weakness, and adventure, risk, and violence.”

In other words, they want to promote a healthier standard of masculinity such as pro-femininity (feminist?), lack of achievement, visible weakness, lack of adventure, safety and passiveness

Way to dance around everything said and use strawmen to avoid having to make an argument, you fucking idiot. How is Freud not being taken seriously a comeback to my post? Freud being discredited because his findings could not be recreated empirically was my point. Why don't you leave for a few months and come back when you have some basic reading comprehension? Intellectual discussion is obviously not your suit.

You didn't refute shit, all you did was fail to read and then throw out some meaningless platitudes that you hoped would pass as 'gotcha's. Now you're projecting your low level of 'talking points' at me, despite the fact that I backed up my statements with multiple verifiable pieces of information, none of which you addressed in any coherent way. You did not respond to what I said. By the way you attempt to approach 'debate' it's obvious that you're a kike. This is textbook pilpul.

I'm a vacuous retard and a woman and a parasite because TRM is a dick-brained retard who only cares about banging sluts? What the FUCK is wrong with you? Do you have brain damage? What the fuck is this?

The feminization of males (soy, trap propaganda, lgbtq, etc) leads women to Tyrone and nation-states will perish under this social-engineering. This OP is an attack. I emplore you to take a look at this article, it's the most credible read you'll likely see all week.

>Today American men are hardly men in the old sense of the word. Rather, most of them will yield to the whims and demands of the fair sex irrespective of considerations of justice and context. In this blind paternalism men are, of course, very well-meaning, but they are also very weak, and their submission is contrary to their own interests. Worst of all, it is destructive to the state itself.

>But in all this “progress” women, as a whole, have shown neither the ability nor the desire to perform equal to men; and it is a sign of the times, and of just how perverse is their social conditioning, that even most men would probably consider that last sentence to be “sexist,” although it is meant only as an empirical description.

>If men keep yielding to women as a matter of course, America will be doomed because, despite fashionable thinking to the contrary, there is very little social order or authority without male leadership. And without those virtues, there is no culture and, eventually, no people at all.

>Such male submission, it should go without saying, is not attractive to women, for what they want is a man whom they cannot bend to their will. As I have written, like foreign nations, women respect nothing so much as superior power. So Nature Herself has made them, nor can cant about “rights” and “gender equality” change that.

Why not start your own? You and your friends can do it. Just pick out a club name and start to develop your culture. You won't want to be late to the game and have a shitty club, I promise you that. European Men's Club. Think of the possibilities.

When USA collapse the male survivors are likely to be competitive, dominant and aggressive so I think the reason for that is (((they))) are trying to neuter them is to prevent the day of the rope from happening during the societal collapse.

I had a debate of sorts at work with a guy who was defending Feminism. Another guy made a joke about an erection alarm, and I said it sounds like something Feminists might do. Then another guy sort of grunted in disagreement.

I had heard that one guy at work had a feminist girlfriend or wife, turns out it was that guy. So we discussed feminism, he defending it, I criticizing it. It didn't really go anywhere as expected, it was mostly a bit of something to pass the time while slaving away as a wage slave. I even mentioned the topic in the OP, and the feminist guy said he agrees with it.

The curious thing about it, is that the guy doesn't seem like a effeminate soyboy cuck. He comes off as a regular working man, not a huge muscular guy, but he has a deep voice, he doesn't act effeminate or anything. My theory is that he used to be a regular guy until he met the succubus that brainwashed him. He didn't get triggered and scream like a bitch or anything, and the discussion was fairly civil.

This is Finland mind you, and the average idiot has absorbed a lot of Marxist/Feminist ideas without understanding that's the case. This guy was different. He seemed more conscious of it, not in an insane or malicious way though, but misguided nonetheless.

Maybe I should steal the Current Year meme from the left and go: "It's 2019, you still believe that feminist claptrap?"

Yes; you see because Cannabis oil has legitimate medical uses, I should be able to be a pot smoking waste of space whose most defining traits are eating trash while high, and erectile dysfunction. BLAZE IT

A lot of normies and NPCs just think feminism is not beating the shit out of women and letting them be "equal." Most don't really get into much deeper thought about it or even think about it. A lot of alpha looking males will say they are feminist because they don't associate the word with green hair landwhales trying to cut their dick off or drug them with estrogen. They just associate the word with being nice and reasonable with women. This is by design of course. That way when they hear someone is against feminism they think "What, so you want to be a dick to women?"

Fucking worthless, never listen to any org that's full of feminist women and betas that can't stand up for themselves. Women are incapable of understanding what it's like to be a man in this(or any) time period and the betas are too weak and serving in hopes of getting sex that they didn't even stand up against this kind of BS getting published. Makes me glad I studied hypnotism rather then psychology as it seems the more sane choice now.

He is the Archetype of the king on the same metaphorical path to immortality that so many men before him have traveled before him(as most of the time immortality is a metaphor for proving your self worthy and starting a family and thus living "forever" through your genes).

I think a lot of men, even in western countries, despise feminism but won't stand up due to "muh PR" in some ways. I've been able to make Many jokes about women in groups of men about this topic they all laugh at consistently, even with gay guys too. It's like they need a leader of some kind to show them they way against this infection of feminism and remind men they have agency and can do things to change their own parts of the world and don't need to run off and hide from it.

Many conclusions are drawn on sparse evidence, and all but those who read fine-print in recommendations often miss many caveats/limitations and never evaluate the quality of evidence for themselves. Meaningful peer review outside of publishing associations is often lacking and subpar to begin with, and this extends sometimes beyond the soft sciences. The end result is that even most professionals in medicine have the utmost confidence in a few (often more at a given accredited institution) practices and protocols for which the evidence is questionable. Case in point, the use of mannitol, which many neurosurgeons hail as a wonder-drug, for which the evidence suggests, in most cases, that it makes no difference in long term mortality or morbidity, or the use of heparin in … I think venous sinus thrombosis for many years, if not still based on one tiny study published in the gazette in the 90's. The scientific method is the basis of reliable discovery, but I must agree with him that in practice, it leaves a bit to be desired. Furthermore, although there is nothing stopping me from writing and posting a blog of meta-analyses and article reviews other than a few costs and the mountain of work it would take, the truth remains that if it is not supported by the mainstream media and or recognizable bodies, nobody gives a shit and the scientific community at large derives no benefit.

You can tell we're living in a feminist society when they hate the penis and masculinity so much. For example, a man can think he has one arm when he has two arms. They will not cut off his arm, but they'll be more than happy to cut off his penis. With that being said. My brother, bless his soul, has stopped taking his HRT and is returning to being a man. He feels sold out by a society that told him to change his sex. That gender is socially constructed. We came from a single mother, and he had no male role models. Men were discouraged from our lives, thankfully I found one at school. The world told him being trans is the solution to his gender identity issues. Instead of you know, providing alternative role models in the community, or valuing the role men play in a young boy's life.

It isn't inverted, they're just taking a particularist standard and making it universal, as always. Masculine men are disgusted by men that act like a bunch of puffs, and therefore they must be anti-feminine. It's an inversion of reality, yes - masculine men idolize feminine women.

That's the thing that always gets me, every time, when the odd Chad goes of the rails and let's out some rage against the machine. It's the women, always the women and the looks on their faces. Their minds telling them no but their bodies telling them yes, incapable of finding resolution in the question of wether she wants his head on platter or his child in her womb. That internal conflict, a battle of instinct against conviction, the torturous dissonance 'always betrayed in their eyes.