Must-See Proof: Corrupt Media, Corrupt Polls

Now, @NumbersMuncher (via @AriFleischer) represents graphically that very same corruption. Namely, how most recent Bizarro-Polls show Barack Obama in the lead despite a disastrous economy and a Mideast in flames.

Briefly put, the polls showing the SCOAMF in the lead are oversampling Democrats to bias the results.

I've always felt that it is going to be 90%/10% D/R. I don't know why Dem Corppppss only give D an 11% advantage. I've always thought, based on the 2010 elections, that D would out vote R by 9:1. I think it should be Obama 90%/Romney 10%. No wait, Obama 99%/Romney 1%. This is after consulting with E. Anglia and Penn St.

The graph should have a slope=1 line passing through the origin to show the actual baseline when the sample is biased. Anything below the line (in this case) would represent Romney being ahead. All the points are below the line

My understanding is Rasmussen uses a rolling average of the previous three months party affiliation which is +1 R not +3. Last month was +3 R but he does a rolling average just like iwth his daily pols.