For 2014 Piaget will once again hold and retain the title of "world's thinnest watch" with the Altiplano 38mm 900P. For years now Piaget has been releasing mechanical watch after mechanical watch exclusively dedicated to the notion of being the thinnest possible of that type. This practice began long ago with lots of success. In 1957 they released the 2mm thick 9P movement and in 1960 they released the famed 12p automatic movement. Sometimes Piaget gets de-throned in a particular "ultra-thin" category by another brand who is able to cut out another fraction of a millimeter from the thickness of a case or movement. This year they take the title of absolute world's thinnest mechanical watch back with this actually very ultra-thin creation that is just 3.65mm thick, and whose movement is merged with the case.

Over the last few years who has been the most interested in "ultra-thin?" Pretty much everyone. The notion of a very thin mechanical watch has been a haute horology trend as of late. What really amused us is when for marketing purposes a lot of brands simply starting adding "ultra thin" to watches that frankly weren't any different than the year before. It seems as though someone decided that 10mm or under was "ultra-thin." Well you could stack close to three Piaget Altiplano 38mm 900P watches next to a 10mm thick watch. The moral of the story is that not all "ultra thins" are created equal. So it is important to note who the major players are.

While there are some others, the real masters of "ultra-thin" are brands like Piaget, Audemars Piguet, Vacheron Constantin, Jaeger-LeCoultre and perhaps Arnold & Son (who released the world's thinnest tourbillon watches with the UTTE (reviewed here) - though we will see what they continue to do in that department in the future. Ultra-thin movements are very interesting, but at some point how thin is thin enough? And beyond some threshold point does more thinness matter for wearability? I'd say that anything 5mm or less is going to wear pretty much the same, being of a similar practical height on your wrist. When you start to shave off fractional amounts of size you are simply getting into the realm of bragging rights. But that is OK. Toys for grown men are frequently about being able to brag to your friends.

I think it is important to discuss what ultra-thin is all about and what goes into it. It is actually more difficult to accomplish than people understand. When aBlogtoWatch visited Piaget in 2011 we got a first hand look at how they design and manufacture their thinnest movements. It is true that the caliber 900P did not exist yet, but as mentioned above, Piaget has been producing very thin movements for decades. It is actually much more difficult as well to assemble a thin movement than a normal one. It isn't just a matter of cleverly reducing space, but it is about properly machining all the parts. Machines that don't have too many parts touching can have high tolerances. When you have all the necessary gears crammed into a roughly 2mm thick area, everything is extremely close to touching one another and much lower tolerances must be possible.

The 900P for example has gears and elements so incredibly thin I am surprised they can be assembled without breaking the parts. This is also the first time Piaget has released a movement that is not only integrated into the dial, but is also integrated into the case. That is really what makes the 900P so unique. It isn't just a thin movement placed into a thin case like most other Piaget Altiplano watches, but rather a new form of unified entity. How does that work? Well clearly there is no distinct dial as it is integrated into the movement. The mainspring barrel isn't connected to the mainplate either but exists off to the side, further reducing space. Some of the gears are almost half the thickness they would normally be and the entire movement (along with the case) is still comprised of 145 parts. Manually wound (of course), the power reserve is about 48 hours.

On the dial of the Altiplano 38mm 900P you have just the time with hours and minutes, along with a view of some of the movement including the balance wheel as well as much of the gear train and also the mainspring barrel with winding system. In black and steel-tone colors mixed with the red color of the synthetic rubies, it makes for an elegant view that cannot escape being designed to appeal to watch lovers. It is also worth noting that if you unscrew the caseback, the entire movement pops out. That is because the caseback is actually the rear plate of the movement. All of this was done for the purpose of size mitigation. Piaget really wanted to ensure no one would come out with anything thinner, anytime soon. I have a feeling that no one will. In fact, if you've noticed the lack of distinct values for the thickness of the case and movement themselves as they aren't offered by Piaget. As it is unclear where the case ends and the movement begins (given the design), they can only offer the 3.65mm thickness value of the entire piece as a whole.

Watch Brands

Fueled by an unshakable love for horology and a general curiosity for intricate things, Ariel Adams founded aBlogtoWatch in 2007 as a means of sharing his passion. Since then, ABTW has become the highest trafficked blog on luxury timepieces, and Ariel has become a contributor to other online publications such as Forbes, Departures and Tech Crunch, to name just a few. His conversational writing style and inclusive attitude brings a wider appreciation for watches the world over, and that's just the way he likes it.
Follow me on Google+ Ariel Adams

Yikes, the strap is thicker than the watch. Where will it all end? With a force field instead of a crystal? Very cool watch and besides being so thin, it is just a nice looking and there is lots of ‘watch guts’ be be seen. Why have an exhibition back if (almost) everything is visible from the front? Now if Richard Mille made it, wouldn’t everything be made from sapphire crystal and cost $2 million? No matter, I like it the way it is.

DG Cayse

What a fascinating engineering and manufacturing puzzle.
Design, materials, and assembly all reduced to their thinnest component structure.
Strength, lubricity, durability – all factors in this work.

I’d never wear one, probably would last more than an hour on my wrist, fumble-bum that I am, but its a fascinating exercise.

Zeitblom

Will they dare to make one like this but with a more reasonable diameter, like 43mm? Does the warranty cover bending the whole watch?

shinytoys

How can you not love it…

Ryan B

Beautiful execution, absolutely marvelous!
Yes I would wear it.

Gee Z

Truly a gorgeous watch, amazingly executed and also the right diameter for this kind of dress watch (it would look like a “wafer” in a larger diameter, and probably the rigidness would suffer too).
I WANT ONE!

Ulysses31

Pretty classy. It’s amazing how thin they can make these watches, but as with cellphones there’s less and less benefit from shaving off the millimetres. James Bond could slash the throat of his enemies with this thing (assuming he had better taste in watches). Personally I prefer watches with more heft, although it would be nice to own one of these just to marvel at it. The funny thing is that that leather strap looks positively oafish compared to the elegant case. I’d definitely wear it but not sure on which occasion.

Kris C

Whatever, Piaget. At this point I refuse to be impressed with your watches until you make a 2-dimensional one.

garph

Uh-oh. I think this is the one.

Ayreonaut

Because its impossible to type with a 4mm thick watch burdening your wrist.