That’s not very nice of you. I’m sure Mr. Surl would be happy to accept criticism, but only if you point out something that’s actually wrong with it in stead of just saying it’s terrible. For instance:
“Your avatar picture is terrible. The colors are terrible and the concept is terrible and the resolution is terrible too.”
vs.
“I think the head on your avatar would look nicer if it were a mite bigger, and perhaps the background would look better red.”
Which is more constructive? Which would you rather receive?

By this time the 2008 Luke Surl he’s criticising is a distant memory. Wizened by the years, 2012 Luke Surl is a mere shell of his former self, he looks back on this bright, optimistic youngster of yesteryear with confusion, or envy – but not familiarity.