Saturday, January 03, 2009

Some highly dubious characters in the "Patriot Community" are spreading the myth that the Arabs were Nazis and therefore the Nazis could not have been Zionists (think "Sam Danner" and "Obama might be another JFK" when judging the quality of the judgement of some of those promoting this mythology). The original source of the myth that the Arabs were Nazis was Jewish propaganda meant to stigmatize the Arabs as if Nazis who wanted to exterminate the Jews. The stigmata is today far less than it was yesterday, but it was yesterday that this myth first appeared and it was the product of Jewish smear propaganda against the Arab world.

The argument that the no Arab would have supported the Nazis if the Nazis were Zionists contains several fatal flaws:

1). Zionism was not the most severe form of colonialism the Arabs faced in the period from 1933-1945, nor was it a realistic threat at that time. The Nazis worked with the Jews to send Jews to Palestine, and the majority of those Jews promptly left Palestine finding life in Palestine unbearable. It was only then that the Nazis ended their open collaboration with the Zionist Jews, because the program was a failure for the Zionist Jews. It was only then, at the behest of the Jewish bankers, that the Nazis turned up the heat on the Jews of Europe to provide them with a future incentive to move to Palestine and stay. In general, the Arabs did not much care about the Jews who were coming to Palestine in relatively small numbers.

In the thirties and early forties, British and French colonialism were far more significant and immediate threats to the many millions of Arabs, than the prospect of a hundred thousand Jews, or so, moving to Palestine, or so the Arabs thought. In fact, the Arabs helped the British defeat the Ottoman Empire in WW I. At that time, the Muslim Arabs fought against fellow Muslims, and with Jews and British Zionists, to defeat the Ottoman Empire and free up Arab land. The British were then openly Zionistic, having issued the Balfour Declaration. So the argument that Arabs would not support Zionists during a world war is false and contradicts known historical facts.

2). It is a known fact that the Nazis were indeed open Zionists, so the presumption that there can be any doubt as to that fact is false. The Nazis financed their economy in collaboration with the Zionists in the Transfer Agreement at a time when the rest of Jewry were boycotting the Germans. It was the British who opposed and hindered Nazi Zionism, not the Arabs. The Arabs and Jews have often been allies throughout their history. They share a similar understanding of monotheism, a common dislike of Christian "Crusaders" and colonialists, similar languages, etc.

3). The assertion that the Arabs were Nazis is false. The Arab nations were not a part of the Axis powers. There was not a single Arab nation which fought on the side of the Nazis. There was a very brief war between a rebellious group in Iraq and the British in 1941, the Anglo-Iraqi war, but it was short-lived and not very costly to the British. There were a handful of Nazi Arabs, just as there were Nazi Norwegians and French Nazis. I dare say there were far more Nazi Americans than Arab Nazis. But the argument that because there were a few Nazis paid by the German government among the millions of Arabs in the Arab nations, that the Arabs were therefore Nazis, is as ludicrous as would be the claim that Norway and France were Axis powers and that the Nazis never made war on Norway or France.

4). It is also ludicrous to presume that the Nazis would not attempt to trick the Arabs into supporting Nazism even though the German Nazis considered the Arabs to be sub-human and subject to the eventual rule of the master race. The Nazis needed oil and control over the Mediterranean. Just as the Nazis were seen as liberators by the Ukrainians, then mass murdered the Ukrainians, the Nazis were seen by some few Arabs as potential liberators from British and French colonialism, but that did not make the Nazis sincere allies of the Arabs, but rather opportunists and tricksters trying to win a war despite Hitler's best efforts to cost Germany the war. The bogus argument disregards the fact that the Arabs could have been tricked. We can see today how a small few of the Arabs are being tricked in Gaza to work against their own interests, while still others are crypto-Jews and controlled opposition forces. It is safe to presume that the Jews had such forces among the Arabs during WW II, as they did during and before WW I.

5). Though the Arab nations did not ally themselves with the Nazis, the Zionist Jews in Palestine did offer to ally with the Nazis and fight the British at the height of the war and after the alleged Nazi extermination campaign against the Jews. If the Nazis were anti-Zionists, why would the Zionists offer to fight with the Nazis? Again, it was the British who were anti-Zionists during Hitler's reign, not the Germans. I argue that this was merely because the British were under Jewish domination and that the Jewish masses were not Zionists and the Zionist Jews wanted to use the Germans to ungently persuade the Jews to become Zionists, just as Herzl openly stated that anti-Semites were the Zionists' best allies.

There is much more which can be said to defeat the fallacious argument that the Arabs were supposedly Nazis and that no Arab would have supported the Nazis if the Nazis were Zionists, but this will suffice for now.

"Muhammad Rafeeq" would have us believe that the Chabad Lubavitch are not religious Jews, but instead merely clothe themselves as if rabbis to deceive us so that they can get away with their crimes. "Muhammad's" claims are preposterous on their face.

It is far easier and much more profitable for Jewish criminals to wear Goyish garb and blend in undetected in general society, than to wear morbid clown suits and foxhide which tags them as Jews, as wall street Jews, media Jews, and Jewish politicians have proven. In addition, who would it be that these passionately religious Jews would be trying to fool by studying the Talmud day and night and making asses of themselves wearing costumes that were once intended to shame them in Europe; and to what advantage would it be to pretend to actually believe the Talmud and Cabalah to which they devote their lives?

Though "Muhammad" would evidently have us believe that there is some contradiction between the criminal behavior of some of Chabad Lubavitch and Judiasm, the opposite is true. Judaism not only condones the criminal behavior of some of the Lubavitch, it encourages it! The criminal behavior of some of the Lubavitch is evidence that they are strict practitioners of Judaism.

"Muhammad" would have us believe that the Jews hold that the Mosaic ten commandments apply to the Goyim and to the treatment the Jews must accord the Goyim, but such is not the case. This is one of the reasons why it is important to disprove "Muhammad's" false assertions that the Old Testament Torah has far greater authority than does Talmud Torah. The passages in the Talmud which permit and encourage the Jews to steal from and murder non-Jews are well known and supercede anything written in the Old Testament Torah, which also encourages the Jews to steal the property of the Goyim, to practice usury against the Goyim, to genocide the Goyim and to destroy the religions and nations of the Goyim, as I have already repeatedly shown.

Beyond all of this, Talmud Torah makes it crystal clear that the Jews do not apply Mosaic Law to Gentiles, that the Jews believe that the Gentiles refused to accept Mosaic Law and even the Law of Noah, and that Jews are not to apply Mosaic Law (ten commandments included) to the Goyim. This is very well known, and for "Muhammad" to pretend otherwise is simply absurd, given that this man has claimed to know the Cabalistic ritual needed to place the soul of Shabbatai Zevi into a Rothschild.

The Talmud is very clear that the Mosaic Law does not apply Gentiles, see for example:

"'Where a suit arises between an Israelite and a heathen, if you can justify the former according to the laws of Israel, justify him and say: 'This is our law'; so also if you can justify him by the laws of the heathens justify him and say [to the other party:] 'This is your law'; but if this can not be done, we use subterfuges to circumvent him. [***] His lost article is permissible, for R. Hama b. Guria said that Rab stated: Whence can we learn that the lost article of a heathen is permissible? Because it says: And with all lost thing of thy brother's: it is to your brother that you make restoration, but you need not make restoration to a heathen."

"Has it not been taught: 'With respect to robbery — if one stole or robbed or [seized] a beautiful woman, or [committed] similar offences, if [these were perpetrated] by one Cuthean against another, [the theft, etc.] must not be kept, and likewise [the theft] of an Israelite by a Cuthean, but that of a Cuthean by an Israelite may be retained'? [***] But where a penalty is incurred, it is explicitly stated, for the commencing clause teaches: 'For murder, whether of a Cuthean by a Cuthean, or of an Israelite by a Cuthean, punishment is incurred; but of a Cuthean by an Israelite, there is no death penalty'? [***] It applies to the withholding of a labourer's wage. One Cuthean from another, or a Cuthean from an Israelite is forbidden, but an Israelite from a Cuthean is permitted."

"WHERE AN OX BELONGING TO AN ISRAELITE HAS GORED AN OX BELONGING TO A CANAANITE THERE IS NO LIABILITY etc. But I might here assert that you are on the horns of a dilemma. If the implication of 'his neighbour' has to be insisted upon, then in the case of an ox of a Canaanite goring an ox of an Israelite, should there also not be exemption? If [on the other hand] the implication of 'his neighbour' has not to be insisted upon, why then even in the case of an ox of an Israelite goring an ox of a Canaanite, should there not be liability? — R Abbahu thereupon said: The Writ says, He stood and measured the earth; he beheld and drove asunder the nations, [which may be taken to imply that] God beheld the seven commandments which were accepted by all the descendants of Noah, but since they did not observe them, He rose up and declared them to be outside the protection of the civil law of Israel [with reference to damage done to cattle by cattle]. R. Johanan even said that the same could be inferred from this [verse], He shined forth from Mount Paran, [implying that] from Paran He exposed their money to Israel. The same has been taught as follows: If the ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability, but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite whether the ox [that did the damage] was Tam or whether it had already been Mu 'ad, the payment is to be in full, as it is said: He stood and measured the earth, he beheld and drove asunder the nations, and again, He shined forth from Mount Paran."

In its article "Gentile", under the subheading "Rabbinical Modification of Laws", The Jewish Encyclopedia states (note that "B. M." signifies the tractate "Baba Mezia" in the Talmud and "B. K." is tractate "Baba Kamma" of the Talmud:

"With regard to the text 'This is the law when a man dieth in a tent' (Num. xix. 14), they held that only Israelites are men, quoting the prophet, 'Ye my flock, the flock of my pasture, are men' (Ezek. xxxiv. 31); Gentiles they classed not as men but as barbarians (B. M. 108b). [***] The barbarian Gentiles who could not be prevailed upon to observe law and order were not to be benefited by the Jewish civil laws, framed to regulate a stable and orderly society, and based on reciprocity. The passage in Moses' farewell address: 'The Lord came from Sinai, and rose up from Seir unto them; he shined forth from Mount Paran' (Deut. xxxiii. 2), indicates that the Almighty offered the Torah to the Gentile nations also, but, since they refused to accept it, He withdrew His 'shining' legal protection from them, and transferred their property rights to Israel, who observed His Law. A passage of Habakkuk is quoted as confirming this claim: 'God came from Teman, and the Holy One from Mount Paran. . . . He stood, and measured the earth; he beheld, and drove asunder [{Hebrew deleted} = 'let loose,' 'outlawed'] the nations' (Hab. iii. 3-6); the Talmud adds that He had observed how the Gentile nations steadfastly refused to obey the seven moral Nachian precepts, and hence had decided to outlaw them (B. K. 38a)."--"Gentile", The Jewish Encyclopedia, Funk and Wagnalls Company, New York, (1903), pp. 615-626, at 619-620.

"As to the origin of the Talmud, the Rabbis6 regard Moses as its first author. They hold that, besides the written law which Moses received from God on Mount Sinai on tables of stone, which is called Torah Schebiktab, he also received interpretations of it, or the oral law, which is called Torah Shebeal Peh. They say that this is the reason why Moses remained so long on the mountain, as God could have given him the written law in one day.7"--Rev. I. B. Pranaitis, The Talmud Unmasked: The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians, Eugene Nelson Sanctuary, New York, (1939), p. 10.

and:

"An important point to note is that this work has always been regarded by the Jews as holy. They have always held it, and still hold it, as more important than the Sacred Scriptures. The Talmud itself shows this very clearly:

'Those who devote themselves to reading the Bible exercise a certain virtue, but not very much; those who study the Mischnah exercise virtue for which they will receive a reward; those, however, who take upon themselves to study the Gemarah exercise the highest virtue.'

Likewise in the tract Sopherim XV, 7, fol. 13b:

'The Sacred Scriptures is like water, the Mischnah wine, and the Gemarah aromatic wine.'

The following is a well-known and highly praised opinion in the writings of the Rabbis:

'My son, give heed to the words of the scribes rather than to the words of the law.'12

'He who transgresses the words of the scribes sins more gravely than the transgressors of the words of the law.'

Also when there are differences of opinion between the Law and the doctors, both must be taken as the words of the Lord God.

In the tract Erubhin, f.13b, where it is related that there was a difference of opinion between the two schools of Hillel and Schamai, it is concluded that:

'The words of both are the words of the living God.'

In the book Mizbeach,13 cap. V, we find the following opinion:

'There is nothing superior to the Holy Talmud.'

Contemporary defenders of the Talmud speak of it almost in the same way.14"--Rev. I. B. Pranaitis, The Talmud Unmasked: The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians, Eugene Nelson Sanctuary, New York, (1939), p. 20.

Lest anyone mistakenly believe that I am focusing on an obscure point that only an expert on this particular subject should have been expected to have known, the Wikipedia online article on Haredi Judaism states:

"One basic belief of the Orthodox community in general is that it is the latest link in a chain of Jewish continuity extending back to the giving of the Torah to Moses at Mount Sinai. It believes that two guides to Jewish law were given to the Israelites at that time: the first, known as the Torah she-bi-khtav, or the 'Written Law' is the Torah as Jews know it today; the second, known as the Torah she-ba'al peh ('Oral Law'), is the exposition as relayed by the scholarly and other religious leaders of each generation. The traditional interpretation of the Oral Torah is considered as the authoritative reading of the Written Law."

The Neturei Karta rely upon the Talmud to justify their belief that the Jews are forbidden to go in large numbers to Palestine before the arrival of the Messiah. In addition to the following source, http://www.zionism-israel.com/dic/Neturei_Karta.htm, Israel Shahak and Norton Mezvinsky wrote in their book Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel:

"The Haredi objection to Zionism is based upon the contradiction between classical Judaism, of which the Haredim are the continuators, and Zionism. Numerous Zionist historians have unfortunately obfuscated the issues here. Some detailed explanation is therefore necessary. In a famous talmudic passage in Tractate Ketubot, page 111, which is echoed in other parts of the Talmud, God is said to have imposed three oaths on the Jews. Two of these oaths that clearly contradict Zionist tenets are: 1) Jews should not rebel against non-Jews, and 2) as a group should not massively emigrate to Palestine before the coming of the Messiah. (The third oath, not discussed here, enjoins the Jews not to pray too strongly for the coming of the Messiah, so as not to bring him before his appointed time.) During the course of post-talmudic Jewish history, rabbis extensively discussed the three oaths. Of major concern in this discussion was the question of whether or not specific Jewish emigration to Palestine was part of the forbidden massive emigration. During the past 1,500 years, the great majority of traditional Judaism's most important rabbis interpreted the three oaths and the continued existence of the Jews in exile as religious obligations intended to expiate the Jewish sins that caused God to exile them."--I. Shahak and N. Mezvinsky, Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel, Pluto Press, London, (1999), p. 18.

The Jews, by their own ancient accounts, were never the native people of Palestine. The Jews, by their own ancient accounts, were always genocidal invaders in the land of Palestine. The Jews fabricated a mythological genocidal Jewish God to justify their wars of extermination on the native peoples of the land of Palestine.

The genocidal Jewish God blessed the Jewish desire to murder their fellow human beings and steal their land and possessions. The Jewish Torah in the Old Testament in Exodus 34:11-17 states:

"11 Observe thou that which I command thee this day: behold, I drive out before thee the Amorite, and the Canaanite, and the Hittite, and the Perizzite, and the Hivite, and the Jebusite.

12 Take heed to thyself, lest thou make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land whither thou goest, lest it be for a snare in the midst of thee:

13 But ye shall destroy their altars, break their images, and cut down their groves:

14 For thou shalt worship no other god: for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God:

15 Lest thou make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land, and they go a whoring after their gods, and do sacrifice unto their gods, and one call thee, and thou eat of his sacrifice;

16 And thou take of their daughters unto thy sons, and their daughters go a whoring after their gods, and make thy sons go a whoring after their gods.

17 Thou shalt make thee no molten gods."

The genocidal Jewish God serves as a mythological justification to the Jews to exterminate their neighbors, the native inhabitants of the land of Palestine. The Jewish Torah in the Old Testament book Numbers 33:51-56 states:

"51 Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, When ye are passed over Jordan into the land of Canaan;

52 Then ye shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you, and destroy all their pictures, and destroy all their molten images, and quite pluck down all their high places:

53 And ye shall dispossess the inhabitants of the land, and dwell therein: for I have given you the land to possess it.

54 And ye shall divide the land by lot for an inheritance among your families: and to the more ye shall give the more inheritance, and to the fewer ye shall give the less inheritance: every man's inheritance shall be in the place where his lot falleth; according to the tribes of your fathers ye shall inherit.

55 But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come to pass, that those which ye let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell.

56 Moreover it shall come to pass, that I shall do unto you, as I thought to do unto them."

The Jewish Torah in the Old Testament book of Deuteronomy 7:1-6 commands the Jews to genocide the native inhabitants of Palestine:

"1 When the LORD thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou;

4 For they will turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the LORD be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly.

5 But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire.

6 For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth."

The Jewish Talmud tractate Sanhedrin folio 20b instructs the Jews to genocide the native inhabitants of Palestine, who are there called "Amalekites". The mythological genocidal Jewish God commands the Jews to exterminate the "Amalekites" and became furious when the Jews left one Amalekite alive to offer as a human sacrifice to the bloodthirsty Jewish God. This genocidal doctrine and conspiracy to exterminate an entire race of People is found throughout the Torah and the remainder of the Jewish Old Testament (Genesis 14:7; 36:12, 16. Exodus 17:8-11, 13-14, 16. Numbers 13:29; 14:25, 43, 45; 24:20. Deuteronomy 25:17-19. See also: Judges 3:13; 5:14; 6:3, 33; 7:12; 10:12; 12:15. I Samuel 14:48;15:2-8, 15, 18, 20, 32; 27:8; 28:18; 30:1, 13, 18. II Samuel 1:1, 8, 13; 8:12. I Chronicles 1:36; 4:43; 18:11. Psalm 83:7). The Jewish Talmud tractate Sanhedrin folio 20b states:

"It has been taught: R. Jose said: Three commandments were given to Israel when they entered the land; [i] to appoint a king; [ii] to cut off the seed of Amalek; [iii] and to build themselves the chosen house [i.e. the Temple] and I do not know which of them has priority. But, when it is said: The hand upon the throne of the Lord, the Lord will have war with Amalek from generation to generation, we must infer that they had first to set up a king, for 'throne' implies a king, as it is written, Then Solomon sat on the throne of the Lord as king. Yet I still do not know which [of the other two] comes first, the building of the chosen Temple or the cutting off of the seed of Amalek. Hence, when it is written, And when He giveth you rest from all your enemies round about etc., and then [Scripture proceeds], Then it shall come to pass that the place which the Lord your God shall choose, it is to be inferred that the extermination of Amalek is first. And so it is written of David, And it came to pass when the king dwelt in his house, and the Lord had given him rest from his enemies round about, and the passage continues; that the king said unto Nathan the Prophet: See now, I dwell in a house of cedars etc."--I. Epstein, Editor, "Sanhedrin 20b", The Babylonian Talmud, Volume 27, The Soncino Press, London, (1935), pp. 107-111, at 109.

The Jewish Cabalistic book the Zohar, Volume I, 25a-25b, states that peoples other than the Jews will be exterminated when the Jews form a state in Palestine,

"But as 'tohu and bohu' gave place to light, so when God reveals Himself they will be wiped off the earth. But withal redemption will not be complete until Amalek will be exterminated, for against Amalek the oath was taken that 'the Lord will have war against Amalek from generation to generation' (Ex. xvii, 16)."--H. Sperling and M. Simon, The Zohar, Volume 1, The Soncino Press, New York, (1933), p. 100.

The Jewish Zohar, Volume I, 28b-29a, states:

"At that time the mixed multitude shall pass away from the world [***] The mixed multitude are the impurity which the serpent injected into Eve. From this impurity came forth Cain, who killed Abel. [***] for they are the seed of Amalek, of whom it is said, 'thou shalt blot out the memory of Amalek' [***] Various impurities are mingled in the composition of Israel, like animals among men. One kind is from the side of the serpent; another from the side of the Gentiles, who are compared to the beasts of the field; another from the mazikin (goblins), for the souls [29a] of the wicked are literally the mazikin (goblins) of the world; and there is an impurity from the side of the demons and evil spirits; and there is none so cursed among them as Amalek, who is the evil serpent, the 'strange god'. He is the cause of all unchastity and murder, and his twin-soul is the poison of idolatry, the two together being called Samael (lit. poison-god). There is more than one Samael, and they are not all equal, but this side of the serpent is accursed above all of them."--H. Sperling and M. Simon, The Zohar, Volume 1, The Soncino Press, New York, (1933), pp. 108-110.

"14. Write this (for) a memorial that Amalek came to battle against Israel prior to all the (other) nations. And rehearse (it) in the ears of Joshua who will bring into the land, that he should command Israel to recompense him (Amalek) for his deed. Here it was hinted to Moses that Joshua would bring in Israel to the land. For I will utterly blot out Therefore I admonish you thus, for I desire to blot them out. 15. And he called the name of it (I. e.,) of the altar. Adonai-nissi (lit., the Lord is my banner (or miracle). The Holy One Blessed Be He wrought for us here a 'miracle'. It is not that the altar was called 'Lord' but (that) he who mentioned the name of the altar would recall the miracle which the Omnipresent wrought: 'The Lord He is our miracle.' 16. And he said (I. e.,) Moses, The hand upon the throne of the Lord The hand of the Holy One Blessed Be He was raised to swear by His throne that there would be for Him war and hatred against Amalek forever. And why is (it written) (throne) and not stated [***]? Is then the (Divine) Name also divided in half (i. e.: [***] instead of the full name)? The Holy One Blessed Be He swore that His name will not be whole (i. e., [***] instead of the full name) nor His throne whole (i. e. [***]) instead of [***] until there will be blotted out the name of Amalek utterly. And when his (Amalek's) name will be blotted out (then) will the (Divine) Name be whole, and it is stated (Ps. 9.7): 'O thou enemy, the waste places are come to an end forever' this refers to Amalek, regarding whom it is written Amos 1.11): 'And his anger he kept forever,' 'And the cities which thou didst uproot Their very memorial is perished' (Ps., ibid. 7). What does (Scripture) state after this? 'But the Lord is enthroned forever' (verse 8)—behold the (Divine) Name is whole (expressed in full); 'He hath established His throne for judgment' (ibid.)—behold his throne is whole [***]."--A. Ben Isaiah, et al., The Pentateuch and Rashi's Commentary: A Linear Translation into English, S. S. & R. Publishing Company, Brooklyn, New York, (1949), pp. 187-188.

Jewish historian Louis Ginzberg stated in his The Legend of the Jews:

"Although Amalek had now received the merited punishment from the hands of Joshua, still his enterprise against Israel had not been entirely unavailing. The miraculous exodus of Israel out of Egypt, and especially the cleaving of the sea, had created such alarm among the heathens, that none among them had dared to approach Israel. But this fear vanished as soon as Amalek attempted to compete in battle with Israel. Although he was terribly beaten, still the fear of the inaccessibility of Israel was gone. It was with Amalek as with that foolhardy wight who plunged into a scalding-hot tub. He scalded himself terribly, yet the tub became a little cooled through his plunge into it. Hence God was not content with the punishment Amalek received in the time of Moses, but swore by His throne and by His right hand that He would never forget Amalek's misdeeds, that in this world as well as in the time of the Messiah He would visit punishment upon him, and would completely exterminate him in the future world. So long as the seed of Amalek exists, the face of God is, as it were, covered, and will only then come to view, when the seed of Amalek shall have been entirely exterminated.

God had at first left the war against Amalek in the hands of His people, therefore He bade Joshua, the future leader of the people, never to forget the war against Amalek; and if Moses had listened intently, he would have perceived from this command of God that Joshua was destined to lead the people into the promised land. But later, when Amalek took part in the destruction of Jerusalem, God Himself took up the war against Amalek, saying, 'By My throne I vow not to leave a single descendant of Amalek under the heavens, yea, no one shall even be able to say that this sheep or that wether belonged to an Amalekite.'

God bade Moses impress upon the Jews to repulse no heathen should he desire conversion, but never to accept an Amalekite as a proselyte. It was in consideration of this word of God that David slew the Amalekite, who announced to him the death of Saul and Jonathan; for he saw in him only a heathen, although he appeared in the guise of a Jew.

Part of the blame for the destruction of Amalek falls upon his father, Eliphaz. He used to say to Amalek: 'My son, dost thou indeed know who will possess this world and the future world?' Amalek paid no attention to this allusion to the future fortune of Israel, and his father urged it no more strongly upon him, although it would have been his duty to instruct his son clearly and fully. He should have said to him: 'My son, Israel will possess this world as well as the future world; dig wells then for their use and build roads for them, so that thou mayest be judged worthy to share in the future world.' But as Amalek had not been sufficiently instructed by his father, in his wantonness he undertook to destroy the whole world. God, who tries the reins and the heart, said to him: 'O thou fool, I created thee after all the seventy nations, but for thy sins thou shalt be the first to descend into hell.'

To glorify the victory over Amalek, Moses built an altar, which God called 'My Miracle,' for the miracle God wrought against Amalek in the war of Israel was, as it were, a miracle for God. For so long as the Israelites dwell in sorrow, God feels with them, and a joy for Israel is a joy for God, hence, too, the miraculous victory over Israel's foe was a victory for God."--L. Ginzberg, The Legend of the Jews, Volume 3, The Jewish Publication Society of America, Philadelphia, (1911/1954), pp. 61-63.

The Judaic religious doctrine of the genocide of the seed of Amalek is alive today. Yehoshafat Harkabi wrote in his book Israel's Fateful Hour:

"Some nationalistic religious extremists frequently identify the Arabs with Amalek, whom the Jews are commanded to annihilate totally (Deuteronomy 25:17-19). As children, we were taught that this was a relic of a bygone and primitive era, a commandment that had lapsed because Sennacherib the Assyrian king had mixed up all the nations so it was no longer possible to know who comes of the seed of Amalek. Yet some rabbis insist on injecting a contemporary significance into the commandment to blot out Amalek."--Y. Harkabi, Israel's Fateful Hour, Harper & Row, New York, (1988), p. 149.

Israel Shahak wrote in his book Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years:

"In addition to laws such as those mentioned so far, which are directed at all Gentiles in the Land of Israel, an even greater evil influence arises from special laws against the ancient Canaanites and other nations who lived in Palestine before its conquest by Joshua, as well as against the Amalekites. All those nations must be utterly exterminated, and the Talmud and talmudic literature reiterate the genocidal biblical exhortations with even greater vehemence. Influential rabbis, who have a considerable following among Israeli army officers, identify the Palestinians (or even all Arabs) with those ancient nations, so that commands like 'thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth'56 acquire a topical meaning. In fact, it is not uncommon for reserve soldiers called up to do a tour of duty in the Gaza Strip to be given an 'educational lecture' in which they are told that the Palestinians of Gaza are 'like the Amalekites'. Biblical verses exhorting to genocide of the Midianite57 were solemnly quoted by an important Israeli rabbi in justification of the Qibbiya massacre,58 and this pronouncement has gained wide circulation in the Israeli army. There are many similar examples of bloodthirsty rabbinical pronouncements against the Palestinians, based on these laws."--I. Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years, Pluto Press, London, (1994/2002), pp. 91-92.

The Jewish People's own words provide irrefutable proof that the Jewish People are, and have been throughout their entire history, engaged in a criminal conspiracy to genocide the People of Palestine. The Jews must be arrested and prosecuted for this crime, and then either imprisoned, or executed.

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

I have observed a prolonged campaign in the Jewish controlled "alternative media" to promote the mythology that the deceased Rebbe Menachem Mendel Schneerson is the messiah of the Jews and that the Chabad Lubavitch is the source of all the problems the World faces from Jewry, and that these Jews are not real Jews.

While it is true that some members of Chabad Lubavitch believed that the late Rebbe Schneerson was the messiah, and fewer still yet believe that Schneerson was the messiah, their beliefs conflict with the Lubavitchers' own dogma on the subject. I have yet to see any evidence that among those who believed that Schneerson was the messiah these persons also believed that Schneerson carried the soul of Shabbatai Zevi.

According to Lubavitcher dogma, there were to be seven Rebbes and after the seventh died, the messiah was then to appear. The Lubavitchers never held that the seventh Rebbe, which was Schneerson, would be the messiah. In fact, Schneerson, himself, stated that he was NOT the messiah.

As per Lubavitcher beliefs, Schneerson played the role of Elijah who heralded the arrival of the messiah, NOT Moshiach ben Joseph nor Moshiach ben David. Therefore, the myth that Schneerson is the inheritor of the soul of Shabbatai Zevi, and that Schneerson will be the anti-Christ / Dajjal to sit on the throne in the coming "third" Temple of Solomon, is demonstrably false and completely unsupported by any verifiable evidence. It appears to me to be a misdirection to lead people away from looking for the anti-Christ among the Jewish bankers. The mythology that Schneerson is to be the messiah of the Jews also has us wasting our time searching after a dead man, when the messiah of the Jews, the anti-Christ, must be a living man and therefore cannot be Schneerson.

The Rothschilds, not the Lubavitchers, declared themselves the Kings of the Jews. The Rothschilds began the modern political Zionist movement, financed it, and fulfilled it. The Lubavitchers opposed Zionism until after the Jewish State was formed, and many still do oppose Zionism. I believe the campaign to lay all the problems the Jews have caused the World and are causing the World on the Chabad Lubavitch, is simply an attempt to pardon the guilty Jewish People, and direct attention away from the Jewish bankers.

We must change perceptions and public opinion regarding Jewish history. The Jews have misrepresented the history of their People and would have us believe that the governments of the past have persecuted the Jews, when in fact the governments of the World have instead sought to protect the citizens of the World from the aggressive and hostile Jews.

It is important that we establish this fact, because we can use the past actions which various governments all through Jewish history have taken to resist the Jewish attack against them, as legal precedents for the actions we must take to defend ourselves from the murderous Jews. We will then be able to demonstrate that our "Power Party" represents the legal measures needed to suppress the Jewish revolt against the human race, and the American People will support and join us. We should use history to our advantage, rather than pretend to be ashamed of what our ancestors did to defend themselves from the genocidal Jews.

How did "Muhammad Rafeeq", raised a Christian, acquire an esoteric knowledge of Shabbataian Cabalah that one would assume would only be known to an initiate and trusted practitioner of Shabbataianism? How did "Muhammad" come to know what Cabalistic ritual would be required to implant the soul of Shabbatai Zevi into another man, in this case, one of the Rothschilds?

Why does he believe such a transmutation of souls is possible, if in fact that is what he believes? If that is not what he believes, then why would he doubt that such a thing could be easily faked, and must of logical necessity be faked, given that it is physically and spiritually impossible? Why would he believe that it is possible that Menachem Mendel Schneerson had inherited the soul of Shabbatai Zevi, if, in fact, that is what "Muhammad" believes?

Why did Daryl Bradford Smith tell me that "Muhammad" told him that he, "Muhammad", was at one time a practitioner of the Cabalah and believes in its occult powers to this day, though he, "Muhammad", again according to Daryl Bradford Smith's accounts, purports to have come to oppose the Cabalah and today, and for some time since abandoning it, has found the Cabalah repulsive and dangerous. How would anyone other than an advanced practitioner of Shabbataian Cabalah have acquired this esoteric and secret knowledge? How would anyone, other than a born Shabbataian, a born Jew, have become so trusted an initiate that this knowledge would have been passed on to him?

Perhaps "Muhammad" can inform of us of a book which would explain how the soul of Shabbatati Zevi could be placed into the body of one of the Rothschilds, and why it would be so difficult, and what those difficulties would be. If not, then perhaps "Muhammad" can provide us with some other source of this knowledge, which would demonstrate how he came to acquire this knowledge which he attempted to use to make an unprovoked and fallacious attack on my credibility.

It is interesting to note that "Muhammad" misrepresents the views of Neturei Karta with respect to the Talmud and mistakenly places in their minds a Shabbataian view of the Talmud as lesser than Torah and Cabalah. Jacob Frank railed against the Talmud.

As for the Lurian/Shabbataian/Frankist Cabalistic view that one should do the opposite of the Torah, consider the fact that the Torah instructs Jews to ruin the Goyim through usury, but to forgive debts to Jews. Why don't the bankers, whom "Muhammad's" friend David Pidcock has identified as the source of our woes, do the opposite of the Torah, charge no interest to the Goyim and forgive Goy debts, but instead impose usury on the Jews and ruin the Jews? Why do they not do the opposite of the Torah, and make the Jews, themselves included, the slaves of the Goyim?

Shabbataianism is the fulfilment of the Torah through political and economic means. It is hardly the opposite of the Torah, though it does indeed offer up that instruction. It is an irrational and inconsistent mythology.

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

There are several reasons why the Jews would like to stop the bleeding the Bernard Madoff scandal has caused their community. I will address just a few of these reasons why crypto-Jews would want the anti-Zionist movement on Madoff's side.

The Bernard Madoff scandal is a terrible embarassment to the Jewish community. It proves that many negative views that the World has held towards the Jews for thousands of years are not "anti-Semitic canards", but rather are demonstrable facts. Indeed, prominent Jews whined in the media they dominate that they are the victims of false stereotypes because the Madoff scandal proves these stereotypes to be true. Hence the Jew and crypto-Jew crew in the "alternative media" went into overdrive to muddy the waters and confuse the issue just as legitimate anti-Zionists were making the most of the scandal to drive home the fact that many of their criticisms of the Jews have been confirmed yet again.

The Jews fear disunity in the Jewish community more than any external threat. When I led a campaign to expose the Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians, the ADL only began to retreat on its position when it sensed that the Jewish community itself was divided on the issue. The Jews hate to see Jews fighting Jews, especially in the public arena. So in step the Jew and crypto-Jew crew in the "alternative media" to tell us that Madoff is a Jewish hero falling on his sword to do what is good for the Jews.

Jewish and crypto-Jewish bankers would be especially keen to see the Madoff investigation lead nowhere, because they are tied to the rope that the investigators are tugging at. The Maffia does not like to see its kingpins go on trial for fear that the investigation will lead to other kingpins and the general condemnation of their criminal enterprise. So it is with the Jewish banking maffia. Were other Jews helping Madoff? Were there unrelated crimes that might be uncovered by an investigation, especially an investigation fueled by public condemnation of the Jewish bankers spearheaded by the authentic Anti-Zionist Movement?

Just as when they tried to undermine the Anti-Zionist Movement's support for Ernst Zuendel, Germar Rudolf and David Irving, the Jew and crypto-Jew crew are trying to undermine the Anti-Zionist Movement's call for the investigation of the Jewish bankers. I am leading a call to criminally and civilly prosecute the Jewish bankers for all of their crimes against humanity for the past 2,500 years, and the Jewish People for sponsoring these crimes, and benefitting from them.

The heat on the Jewish bankers is high and the Jew and crypto-Jew crew want to cool off the flames of passion the Madoff investigation has generated. Why are they not calling for the investigation of the whole Jewish cabal and their capital punishment? Why are they not demanding the banking industry be audited top to bottom and all the criminals put in jail? Why are they not demanding that the fortunes of the Jewish bankers, and the Jewish People, be confiscated? I'll tell you why, it is because they are the Jew and crypto-Jew crew and they always do what they believe is good for the Jews.

It is better for the Jews to put this Madoff Frankenstein monster to bed before the Goyim come after the Jewish bankers with pitch forks and torches in hand, shining a bright light on the rats in every corner of the Jewish banking industry. It would be especially harmful to the Jewish bankers to have Jews demanding an investigation of them, because it is far more difficult to accuse prominent Jews of "anti-Semitism". If prominent Jews were to demand an investigation of the entire banking industry, many heads would likely roll. Instead of excusing Madoff, we should be calling for a broader investigation and for the repeal of unjust laws which tax the taxpayer to pay for banker fraud.

Every nation which has broken the yoke of the Jews has had to remove the Jews from government and prevent the Jews from influencing government. In every society which the Jews have infected, the Jews have corrupted the government to operate against the interests of the native majority and in favor of the hostile Jews.

The Jews are disloyal and hostile to all other nations and always have been. The Jews are taught to destroy all Gentile governments, which historically have been Monarchies. The Jewish Zohar, which all religious Jews revere, and which has inspired recent Jewish revolutionary movements and therefore forms the basis for the political beliefs and subversive intentions of most Jews, be they religious, apostate or atheistical Jews.

Prainitis wrote in his The Talmud Unmasked: The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians,

"III. CHRISTIANS ARE TO BE KILLED BECAUSE THEY ARE TYRANTS

In Zohar (I, 25a) it says:

'The People of the Earth are idolaters, and it has been written about them: Let them be wiped off the face of the earth. Destroy the memory of the Amalekites. They are with us still in this Fourth Captivity, namely, the Princes [of Rome] . . . who are really Amalakites."

1. THESE PRINCES ARE TO BE KILLED FIRST

For if they are allowed to live, the hope of the liberation of the Jews is in vain, and their prayers for release from this Fourth Captivity are of no avail. In Zohar (I, 219b) it says:

"It is certain that our captivity will last until the princes of the gentiles who worship idols are destroyed."

And again in Zohar (II, 19a) it says:

"Rabbi Jehuda said: Come and see how it is; how the princes have assumed power over Israel and the Israelites make no outcry. But their rejoicing is heard when the prince falls. It is written that: the King of the Egyptians died and soon the children of Israel were released from captivity; they cried out and their voice ascended to God."

The Torah tells the Jews that they are destined to enslave humanity and that the Jews are superior to all others, whom the Old Testament calls "Goyim", which translates as "the nations". The Old Testament states that the Jews are a master race which will rule over the subhuman "Goyim", "the Nations". The Torah states in Exodus 19:5-6:

"5 Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth is mine: 6 And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel."

The Torah states in Numbers 24:17-20:

"17 I shall see him, but not now: I shall behold him, but not nigh: there shall come a Star out of Jacob, and a Sceptre shall rise out of Israel, and shall smite the corners of Moab, and destroy all the children of Sheth. 18 And Edom shall be a possession, Seir also shall be a possession for his enemies; and Israel shall do valiantly. 19 Out of Jacob shall come he that shall have dominion, and shall destroy him that remaineth of the city. 20 And when he looked on Amalek, he took up his parable, and said, Amalek was the first of the nations; but his latter end shall be that he perish for ever."

The Torah states in Numbers 33:50-56:

"50 And the LORD spake unto Moses in the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho, saying, 51 Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, When ye are passed over Jordan into the land of Canaan; 52 Then ye shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you, and destroy all their pictures, and destroy all their molten images, and quite pluck down all their high places: 53 And ye shall dispossess the inhabitants of the land, and dwell therein: for I have given you the land to possess it. 54 And ye shall divide the land by lot for an inheritance among your families: and to the more ye shall give the more inheritance, and to the fewer ye shall give the less inheritance: every man's inheritance shall be in the place where his lot falleth; according to the tribes of your fathers ye shall inherit. 55 But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come to pass, that those which ye let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell. 56 Moreover it shall come to pass, that I shall do unto you, as I thought to do unto them."

The Torah states in Deuteronomy 7:6:

"For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth."

Deuteronomy 28:9-13 states:

"9 The LORD shall establish thee an holy people unto himself, as he hath sworn unto thee, if thou shalt keep the commandments of the LORD thy God, and walk in his ways.

10 And all people of the earth shall see that thou art called by the name of the LORD; and they shall be afraid of thee.

11 And the LORD shall make thee plenteous in goods, in the fruit of thy body, and in the fruit of thy cattle, and in the fruit of thy ground, in the land which the LORD sware unto thy fathers to give thee.

12 The LORD shall open unto thee his good treasure, the heaven to give the rain unto thy land in his season, and to bless all the work of thine hand: and thou shalt lend unto many nations, and thou shalt not borrow.

13 And the LORD shall make thee the head, and not the tail; and thou shalt be above only, and thou shalt not be beneath; if that thou hearken unto the commandments of the LORD thy God, which I command thee this day, to observe and to do them:"

The Cabalistic Zohar did not arise in a vacuum, rather it is the practical plan for implementing the religious plan of the Torah. It was the Torah, not the Zohar, which first demanded that the Jews exterminate the Amalekites and leave no man, woman or child left alive (Genesis 14:7; 36:12, 16. Exodus 17:8-11, 13-14, 16. Numbers 13:29; 14:25, 43, 45; 24:20. Deuteronomy 25:17-19. See also: Judges 3:13; 5:14; 6:3, 33; 7:12; 10:12; 12:15. I Samuel 14:48;15:2-8, 15, 18, 20, 32; 27:8; 28:18; 30:1, 13, 18. II Samuel 1:1, 8, 13; 8:12. I Chronicles 1:36; 4:43; 18:11. Psalm 83:7).

The primary ambition of the Jews has always been to genocide the rest of the human race.

When you cut off the head, the body dies. The Jews have always sought to murder the Monarchies, to destroy the governments of the "Goyim", "the Nations"; so that the Jews can institute a Jewish World government, which they will rule from Jerusalem. The Old Testament contains many passages instructing the Jews to destroy the governments of the Gentiles. Psalm 2:1-12 (see also: Sukkah 52a-b) states:

"Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? 2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, 3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. 4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision. 5 Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure. 6 Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion. 7 I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. 8 Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. 9 Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel. 10 Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth. 11 Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling. 12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him."

Psalm 2 states:

"1 Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? 2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, 3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. 4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision. 5 Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure. 6 Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion. 7 I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. 8 Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. 9 Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel. 10 Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth. 11 Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling. 12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him."

Psalm 18:40-50 states:

40 Thou hast also given me the necks of mine enemies; that I might destroy them that hate me. 41 They cried, but there was none to save them: even unto the LORD, but he answered them not. 42 Then did I beat them small as the dust before the wind: I did cast them out as the dirt in the streets. 43 Thou hast delivered me from the strivings of the people; and thou hast made me the head of the heathen: a people whom I have not known shall serve me. 44 As soon as they hear of me, they shall obey me: the strangers shall submit themselves unto me. 45 The strangers shall fade away, and be afraid out of their close places. 46 The LORD liveth; and blessed be my rock; and let the God of my salvation be exalted. 47 It is God that avengeth me, and subdueth the people under me. 48 He delivereth me from mine enemies: yea, thou liftest me up above those that rise up against me: thou hast delivered me from the violent man. 49 Therefore will I give thanks unto thee, O LORD, among the heathen, and sing praises unto thy name. 50 Great deliverance giveth he to his king; and sheweth mercy to his anointed, to David, and to his seed for evermore."

Psalm 72:8-11 states:

"8 He shall have dominion also from sea to sea, and from the river unto the ends of the earth. 9 They that dwell in the wilderness shall bow before him; and his enemies shall lick the dust. 10 The kings of Tarshish and of the isles shall bring presents: the kings of Sheba and Seba shall offer gifts. 11 Yea, all kings shall fall down before him: all nations shall serve him."

Psalm 110:1-7 states:

"The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool. 2 The LORD shall send the rod of thy strength out of Zion: rule thou in the midst of thine enemies. 3 Thy people shall be willing in the day of thy power, in the beauties of holiness from the womb of the morning: thou hast the dew of thy youth. 4 The LORD hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek. 5 The Lord at thy right hand shall strike through kings in the day of his wrath. 6 He shall judge among the heathen, he shall fill the places with the dead bodies; he shall wound the heads over many countries. 7 He shall drink of the brook in the way: therefore shall he lift up the head."

Isaiah 40:23 states:

"That bringeth the princes to nothing; he maketh the judges of the earth as vanity."

Isaiah 49:7 states:

"Thus saith the LORD, the Redeemer of Israel, and his Holy One, to him whom man despiseth, to him whom the nation abhorreth, to a servant of rulers, Kings shall see and arise, princes also shall worship, because of the LORD that is faithful, and the Holy One of Israel, and he shall choose thee."

Isaiah 49:23 states:

"And kings shall be thy nursing fathers, and their queens thy nursing mothers: they shall bow down to thee with their face toward the earth, and lick up the dust of thy feet; and thou shalt know that I am the LORD: for they shall not be ashamed that wait for me."

Isaiah 60:12 states:

"For the nation and kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish; yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted."

Isaiah 61:9 states:

"And their seed shall be known among the Gentiles, and their offspring among the people: all that see them shall acknowledge them, that they are the seed which the LORD hath blessed."

Jeremiah 10:10 states:

"But the LORD is the true God, he is the living God, and an everlasting king: at his wrath the earth shall tremble, and the nations shall not be able to abide his indignation."

Ezekiel 39:17-18 states:

"17 And, thou son of man, thus saith the Lord GOD; Speak unto every feathered fowl, and to every beast of the field, Assemble yourselves, and come; gather yourselves on every side to my sacrifice that I do sacrifice for you, even a great sacrifice upon the mountains of Israel, that ye may eat flesh, and drink blood. 18 Ye shall eat the flesh of the mighty, and drink the blood of the princes of the earth, of rams, of lambs, and of goats, of bullocks, all of them fatlings of Bashan."

Micah 17:16-17 states:

"The nations shall see and be confounded at all their might: they shall lay their hand upon their mouth, their ears shall be deaf. 17 They shall lick the dust like a serpent, they shall move out of their holes like worms of the earth: they shall be afraid of the LORD our God, and shall fear because of thee."

Zechariah 14:9 states:

"And the LORD shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one LORD, and his name one."

As the above proves, the Jews are at war with all of our governments. The Jews instigate wars, practice usury, participate in government to subvert it, control elections, propose legislation, etc. all to undermine every Gentile government to work against the best interests of its People in favor of the murderous and greedy Jews who are determined to rule the World, so that they can exterminate every non-Jew down to the last man, woman and child.

The Jews are such a heinous People, that we have abundant legal precedent down through the entire history of the Jewish People for excluding Jews from government and for compelling them to integrate or otherwise disappear. From Caligula to Hitler, the governments of the nations the Jews have infected with their hateful and corrosive presence have sought to break the yoke of the Jews by removing them from government and forcing them to adopt normal human standards for the epoch in which they lived.

The mistake that so many of these governments have made is permitting the Jews to segregate. We must insist that no two Jews bear children between them, and that Jews not be permitted to associate with other Jews outside their immediate family. Short of ending their lives, this is evidently the only way to put an end to the Jewish war on the human race.

If we are to survive, we must remove all Jews from government and make it a capital criminal offense for any Jew to even attempt to influence politics in any manner, including, but not limited to: commenting on political matters; participating in the press or the educational system; donating to political campaigns and causes; proposing, complimenting or critizing any candidate or politician, etc. The sooner the nations of the World adopt these legal measures, the sooner the Jewish war on the human race will end.

We must also make it illegal for anyone to accuse another of "anti-Jewish" or "anti-Semitic" expressions or beliefs.

Whenever a nation permits Jews to interfere in its politics, the results are inevitably a usurious monetary system, wars, depressions, and moral and cultural decay. If we are to be healthy, we must purge our government and political system of Jews and Jewish influence of any kind.

Monday, December 29, 2008

Jews really do not like Jesus Christ or the Prophet Muhammad. The Jewish Babylonian Talmud states in Gittin 57a that Jesus is boiling in hell in hot excrement,

"He then went and raised Balaam by incantations. He asked him: Who is in repute in the other world? He replied: Israel. What then, he said, about joining them? He replied: Thou shalt not seek their peace nor their prosperity all thy days for ever.[Footnote: Deut. XXIII, 7.] He then asked: What is your punishment? He replied: With boiling hot semen.[Footnote: Because he enticed Israel to go astray after the daughters of Moab. V. Sanh. 106a.] He then went and raised by incantations the sinners of Israel.[Footnote: {MS.M. Jesus}.] He asked them: Who is in repute in the other world? They replied: Israel. What about joining them? They replied: Seek their welfare, seek not their harm. Whoever touches them touches the apple of his eye. He said: What is your punishment? They replied: With boiling hot excrement, since a Master has said: Whoever mocks at the words of the Sages is punished with boiling hot excrement. Observe the difference between the sinners of Israel and the prophets of the other nations who worship idols."—I. Epstein, Gittin 57a, "Gittin", The Babylonian Talmud, Volume 21, The Soncino Press, London, (1936), pp. 261-265, at 261.

The Talmudic tractate Sukkah, folio 52b states that the Muslims are the enemies of God (though the Talmud was written before the appearance of Islam, the Jews consider the Muslims to be Ishmaelites and Rabbi Kahane has applied this text to Muslims),

"R. Hana b. Abba stated: It was said at the schoolhouse, There are four things of which the Holy One, blessed be He, repents that He had created them, and they are the following: Exile, the Chaldeans, the Ishmaelites and Evil Inclination. 'The Exile', since it is written, Now, therefore, what do I here, saith the Lord, seeing that My people is taken away for naught etc.;9 'the Chaldeans', since it is written, Behold the land of the Chaldeans—this is the people that was not;10 'the Ishmaelites', since it is written, The tents of the robbers11prosper, and they that provoke God are secure since God brought them with His hand;12 'the Evil Inclination', since it is written, [And I will gather her that is driven away] and her that I have afflicted.13"—I. Epstein, Editor, "Sukkah 52b", The Babylonian Talmud, Volume 12, The Soncino Press, London, (1935), pp. 249-252, at 250.

"From the side of idolatry Shabbethaj (Saturn) is called Lilith [Footnote: Lilith is a female demon, comp. Is. XXXIV. 14 and Weber, Altsynagogale palaestinische Theologie, p. 246.], mixed dung, on account of the filth mixed from all kinds of dirt and worms, into which they throw dead dogs and dead asses, the sons of 'Esau and Ishma'el, and there (read [Hebrew deleted]) Jesus and Mohammed, who are dead dogs, are buried among them. She (Lilith) is the grave of idolatry, where they bury the uncircumcised, (who are) dead dogs, abomination and bad smell, soiled and fetid, a bad family. She (Lilith) is the ligament [Footnote: {Hebrew deleted} is a fibre attached to the lungs] which holds fast the 'mixed multitude' (Ex. xii. 38), which is mixed among Israel, and which holds fast bone and flesh, that is, the sons of 'Esau and Ishma'el, dead bone and unclean flesh torn of beasts in the field, of which it is said (Ex. xxii. 31): 'Ye shall cast it to the dogs.'"—G. Dalman, Jesus Christ in the Talmud, Midrash, Zohar, and the Liturgy of the Synagogue, Deighton Bell, Cambridge, (1893), p. 40.

The New Testament clearly states that the Jews killed Jesus Christ. I Thessalonians 2:14-15 states,

"14 For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews: 15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:"

Though many Jews claim that the New Testament story that the Jews killed Christ is an anti-Semitic canard, the Jews themselves boast in their most holy Talmud that they killed Christ in Sanhedrin106a-b,

"Balaam also the son of Beor, the soothsayer, [did the children of Israel slay with the sword].3 A soothsayer? But he was a prophet! — R. Johanan said: At first he was a prophet, but subsequently a soothsayer.4 R. Papa observed: This is what men say, 'She who was the descendant of princes and governors, played the harlot with carpenters.'5 Did the children of Israel slay with the sword among them that were slain by them.6 Rab said: They subjected him to four deaths, stoning, burning, decapitation and strangulation.7"--I. Epstein, Sanhedrin 106a-b, "Sanhedrin II", The Babylonian Talmud, Volume 28, The Soncino Press, London, (1935), pp. 721-729, at 725.

and Sanhedrin folio 43a,

"On the eve of the Passover Yeshu34 was hanged. For forty days before the execution took place, a herald went forth and cried, 'He is going forth to be stoned because he has practised sorcery and enticed Israel to apostacy. Any one who can say anything in his favour, let him come forward and plead on his behalf.' But since nothing was brought forward in his favour he was hanged on the eve of the Passover!35"--Sanhedrin 43a, Babylonian Talmud, as translated in the Soncino edition, http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_43.html

"An attempt on the life of Mohammed was made at Khaibar by a Jewish woman named Zainab, who, in revenge for the death of her male relatives in battle, put poison in a dish prepared by her for the prophet. One of Mohammed's followers who par-took of the food died almost immediately afterward; but the prophet, who had eaten more sparingly, escaped. He, however, complained of the effects of the poison to the end of his life."

Contrary to "Muhammad's" contentions, there is a very old belief that a Jewess named Zainab poisoned the Prophet Muhammad. Contrary to "Muhammad's" conspiracy theory that Jews should object to the publication of this theory because it will bring a backlash from Muslims, Jews, prominent Jewish historians among them, celebrate the story of Zainab and delight in the idea that she poisoned the Prophet.

While "Muhammad" would ridiculously scapegoat me for a backlash of Muslims against Jews, which would surely come from other sources such as the Jews' genocides of Muslim nations, because I mention the widely known story of Zainab which "Muhammad" would style an anti-Semitic act, The Jewish Encyclopedia gives the story credence and the weight of its authority,

"An attempt on the life of Mohammed was made at Khaibar by a Jewish woman named Zainab, who, in revenge for the death of her male relatives in battle, put poison in a dish prepared by her for the prophet. One of Mohammed's followers who par-took of the food died almost immediately afterward; but the prophet, who had eaten more sparingly, escaped. He, however, complained of the effects of the poison to the end of his life."

According to the following webpage, http://www.root-1.co.il/poems.htm, which depicts cartoons which Muslims are bound to find offensive, famous Jewish historian Heinrich Graetz wrote of "courageous" Zainab, the Jewess who is said to have poisoned the Prophet,

"The war, in which Muhammad employed 14,000 warriors, lasted almost two months. (Spring 628).

"The war against Khaibar assumed the same character as that which was waged against the other Jewish tribes. It was begun by the cutting down of the palm trees and the siege of the small fortresses, which surrendered after a short resistance. Muhammad met the most vigorous resistance at the fortress Kamus, which was built on a steep rock. The Muhammadans were several times beaten back by the Jews. Abu Bekr and Omar, Muhammad's two bravest generals, lost their distinction as unconquered heroes before the walls of Kamus. (For the Jews the giant) Marhab performed wonderful feats of valor."

"When Muhammad sent his third general, Ali, against him, the Jewish hero addressed him thus: 'Khaibar knows my valor. I am Marhab the hero, well armed and tried in the field.' He then challenged Ali to single combat. But his time had come. He fell at the hands of his peer. After many attempts, the enemy succeeded in effecting an entrance into the fortress. How the captives fared is not known. Kinanah was captured and put on the rack in order to force him to discover his hidden treasures. But he bore pain and even death without uttering a word. ... Zainab, the sister of Marhab, (was captured)."

"This courageous woman bethought herself of an artifice, whereby she might avenge the murder of her co-religionists and relatives. She pretended to be friendly towards him, and prepared a repast for him. Muhammad unsuspectingly ate of a poisoned dish which she had set before him and his companions. One of them died from the effects. But Muhammad, who, not having found the dish to his taste, had scarcely tasted it, was saved alive, but suffered for a long time, and felt the effects of the poison to the hour of his death. Questioned as to the reason for her action, Zainab coolly replied, 'You have persecuted my people with untold afflictions; I therefore thought that if you were simply a warrior, I could procure rest for them through poison, but if you were really a prophet, God would warn you in time, and you would come to no harm.'"

"Muhammad thereupon ordered her to be put to death."

Would "Muhammad" have us believe that The Jewish Encyclopedia and Heinrich Graetz were engaged in an anti-Semitic plot to bring down the wrath of the Muslims on the poor innocent Jews "Muhammad" so loves?

"Muhammad Rafeeq" has stated that he is a Christian convert to Islam. I am unclear as to whether or not he has ever practiced any form of Judaism at any point in his life, or whether or not he has any Jewish blood. Perhaps he will enlighten me as to the answers to these questions.

"Muhammad Rafeeq" has posited the theory that he was referred to as a Jewish convert to Islam, because he published an apologia for Bernard Madoff and somehow his arguments about Madoff would be discredited if he were of the Jewish faith before converting to Islam. I fail to follow his reasoning, but regardless of that, the fundamental premise of "Muhammad's" theory is demonstrably false due to the fact that these questions were raised a long time before he published his article on Madoff.

Perhaps "Muhammad" has a theory as to how Rense.com came to refer to him as a Jewish convert to Islam and referred to him as "Paul". And where is the shame in that, "Muhammad"? There is a difference between inaccurate and shameful.

Long before the article appeared on Jeff Rense's website, or was even written, I directly asked "Muhammad" if he is a Jewish convert to Islam over one year ago:

Long before that, Daryl Bradford Smith told me that "Muhammad" was a Jewish convert to Islam. So "Muhammad's" theory that all of this is some recent phenomenon meant to discredit his widely publicized apologia for Bernard Madoff is patently absurd and contradicted by facts known to "Muhammad" for a very long time. So why is he positing this strange theory? Why does he evidently take offense that some believed he was a Jewish convert to Islam, when he so loves the Jews, when he so loves the Torah, and when he so loves the Talmud? Why doesn't "Muhammad" simply smile and say, no, I'm not of the Jewish race, have no Jewish blood in my Gentile veins, but I would be proud if I had? Why does he instead get all upset and protest loudly that he was raised a Christian? Why does he come up with a conspiracy theory that contradicts facts known to him?

Alas, these are probably just more relevant questions "Muhammad" will not answer. . . but let us wait and see, maybe he will.

And speaking of questions, how many of the (founding?) members of David Pidcock's Islamic Party of Britain were converts to Islam? Were you a member, "Muhammad"? Were any of them ever Freemasons or Jews (religious and/or racial)? Were you ever a Freemason, and/or a racial or religious Jew? Just asking. I don't know the answers. And, uh, "Muhammad", how come you know so much about Cabalah, Lurian Cabalah, no less? Frankly, I am growing bored with this, so please just some simple straightforward answers sans the conspiracy theories and personal attacks. And don't try to psychoanalyze the situation. It is kind of a Jewy thing to do and a bit pretentious.

Sunday, December 28, 2008

Despite what he claims today, "Muhammad Rafeeq" began an unprovoked attack on my credibility and my work back in July of 2007, in, among other places, the following webpage on wakeupfromyourslumber.com:

I confronted the sophist directly and posed several questions directly to him, which he would not answer, and note that he was not at all curious as to why I would ask such questions:

"Muhammad-Rafeeq

Muhammad-Rafeeq has misrepresented my work, and the history of Cabalistic Judaism. The Zohar did not arise in a vacuum. It is a product of Judaism and the racism expressed in the Cabalah is a refinement of the racism expressed in the Hebrew Bible and the fabricated "oral tradition". The messianic beliefs of Cabalah, especially the Lurianic Cabalah, are the product of Torah and the oral tradition, and did not arise in a vacuum.

How could Muhammad-Rafeeq have missed my many statements in my written work and in my interviews, where I raise the issues of Jewish Dualism and the Shabbataian betrayal of fellow Jews and pursuit of evil, i.e. their attacks on Torah and pretense of heresy through conversion? Is he so ignorant (surely he is not) as to fail to realize the meaning of my statements? Why does he falsely accuse me of not knowing the concept of "redemption through sin", i. e. the rejection of Torah, by Shabbataians? It is one of my primary themes, and yet Muhammad-Rafeeq raises a straw man from nowhere with which to attack me.

A few questions for Muhammad-Rafeeq:

Were you a Cabalistic Jew who converted to Islam?

Have you worked with other converts to Islam in the areas of banking?

Was the Balfour Declaration made out to Rothschild, or Hoenig?

Did the Rothschilds seek to become King of the Jews in Jerusalem?

What are the religious implications of a Jew becoming King of the Jews, and ruling the Jews from Jerusalem?

Were the Lubavitchers anti-Zionist before the formation of Israel?

Were the Rothschilds Zionists before the formation of Israel?

Why did you suddenly appear on The French Connection when I began to expose the Frankists?

Do you think Ashkenazim are false Jews and Sephardim are true Jews?

I have more questions for Muhammad-Rafeeq, but I will first await the answer to these.

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Christopher Jon... | Wed, 2007-07-25 03:19

>>>>>>>>>>>>

Muhammad-Rafeeq

Your pretentious lectures, in which you hide from each and every issue I raise, and in which you invite me to join you in your asinine and juvenile games, are as phony as everything else about you. Instead of again misrepresenting what I have said in order to introduce more of your straw men, why don't you admit that you were wrong? It seems childish and irrational of you to hide from your mistakes by making silly, condescending and didactic commentary on what I haven't said. If you cannot express yourself in a clear fashion, that is your deficiency, not that of the reader.

Are you, like Shabbatai Zevi, a Cabalistic Jew who converted to Islam? Do you, like the Doenmeh, attempt to lead Moslems in such areas as banking and finance? Have you worked with other converts to Islam in these fields?

Are you an apologist for the Rothschilds? Are you attempting to steal my thunder for exposing the Frankists and Doenmeh? Why are you not celebrating the fact that my work exposing the Jewish genocide of Armenian Christians is receiving a great deal of attention? Why are you instead attacking me and my reputation as a scholar?

I am still awaiting the answers to the following questions from this man who has attacked me without cause based on falsehoods of his manufacture:

A few questions for Muhammad-Rafeeq:

Were you a Cabalistic Jew who converted to Islam?

Have you worked with other converts to Islam in the areas of banking?

Was the Balfour Declaration made out to Rothschild, or Hoenig?

Did the Rothschilds seek to become King of the Jews in Jerusalem?

What are the religious implications of a Jew becoming King of the Jews, and ruling the Jews from Jerusalem?

Were the Lubavitchers anti-Zionist before the formation of Israel?

Were the Rothschilds Zionists before the formation of Israel?

Why did you suddenly appear on The French Connection when I began to expose the Frankists?

What led Eric Hufschmid to make that statement? How did Hufschmid know that "Muhammad" was a convert? "Muhammad" states that he is a convert from Christianity to Islam, not from Judaism to Islam, and I have no reason to doubt his claim. Was Hufschmid referring to race, religion, or both?

Daryl Bradford Smith interviewed "Muhammad Rafeeq" birth name unkown to me, on 28 December 2008 in an apparent attempt to rebut what I have recently written about them. I will first address what "Muhammad Rafeeq" did not say. He did not say that he has NO Jewish blood. He did not say what his birth name was. He did not say what his grandparents' names were. He focused on religion, not Jewishness as a bloodline. "Muhammad" did not confirm nor deny that he was a deep student of the Cabalah. Where does his advanced knowledge of Cabalah come from? Why did "Muhammad" not provide this basic information which one would expect?

I will now address what Daryl Bradford Smith did not say. He did not deny that he told me that "Muhammad" is of Jewish descent and was deeply involved in Cabalah.

Out of thousands of pages of published material and hours of interviews, the only issues these two men could raise to criticize my work, was the fact that some do indeed state that a Jew poisoned the Prophet Muhammad, which is all I have ever said on the subject, and somehow these persons pretend that this is an indictment of what I have said. It is amazing, even funny.

They are stating I am correct, that they don't like me, and therefore I am wrong even though I am right, and they are in agreement with my statements. The other issue they raise is their claim that I have said that the Jews caused the split between Muslims which produced the Shia. I ask them to quote me, for I do not recollect having made such a claim. I will however refer my readers to Nesta Webster's book Secret Societies and Subversive Movements for information about events in Muslim history.

"Muhammad" accuses me of being on the side of the Jews, by asking why he is raising a defense for Madoff, then accuses me of having anti-Semitic feelings because he has a agreed with me that some believe the Prophet Muhammad was poisoned by a Jew, and he accuses me without quoting me, of claiming that the Jews created the Shia. "Muhammad", birth name not revealed, accuses me of trying to cause a backlash by the Muslims against the Jews.

Indeed, I would love to see a backlash by Muslims and all other normal human beings against the monstrous Jews, but not for the reasons "Muhammad" alleged.

One would think that the Jewish destruction of the Ottoman Empire and the Jewish theft of Palestine, the Jewish wars on Iraq and Afghanistan, the genocide of the Palestinians, etc. would be enough to provoke a Muslim backlash against the Jews. "Muhammad" does me honor by claiming that it shall be I who finally generates this backlash by raising the historical fact that some claim that the a Jew poisoned the Prophet Muhammad. In "Muhammad's" mind, I have more power through my words to provoke a Muslim backlash against Jews, than do the Jews themselves through their genocides of Muslims. Evidently, "Muhammad" views himself as a guardian of the Jews.

Daryl Bradford Smith alleges that I added a books page to my website after he added one to his. In point of fact, I had a books page on my website years before he added one to his website, but never let facts bother the smearmonger. This is the same Daryl Bradford Smith who promoted the nonsense that Christopher Bollyn was kidnaped or murdered, and that it was suspicious that I lived near Chicago--a typical example of Smith's "reasoning". Smith falsely claimed that I stated that he is the "lapdog" of "Muhammad" and that I claimed that "Muhammad" is a "Zionist". I made no such claims, rather I referred to Smith as "Muhammad's" "sidekick" and "pupil".

"Muhammad" states that the idea that Daryl Bradford Smith could possibly be anyone's poodle is absurd on its face, yet Smith himself claims that Eric Hufschmid led him for years. Michael Collins Piper also faults Hufschmid for Smith's attacks. Smith tries to find a similarity between me and Hufschmid, but it is Smith who worked with Hufschmid for years to attack people, not me.

Now on to what "Muhammad" did say. He said his father was a "nominal Christian" who wore a golden cross round his neck as a "good luck figurine". I have never heard of such a thing before. It sounds like something a Jew would do.

"Muhammad" said that his mother, like he, was prone to conversion. "Muhammad" stated that he does not normally talk about his life before his conversion to Islam outside of his family--first time I have heard him acknowledge that he is a convert. Why is that "Muhammad", why do you not talk about your life before conversion? Do you have any relatives in the banking business? Have you studied Cabalah, "Muhammad"?

"Muhammad" faults Christian Zionists, something I have always done, but unlike "Muhammad", I point out the fact that Jews created Christian Zionism and promote it.

"Muhammad" claims that the Neturei Karta believe that the Torah is composed solely of the Pentateuch and that the Neturei Karta hold the Pentateuch to be an authority over the Talmud. What are his bases for making these extraordinary claims? He does not say.

"Muhammad" also claimed that Neturei Karta rely upon the Pentateuch to claim that the Jews must wait for the Messiah before taking over Palestine. The fact is Neturei Karta rely upon the Talmud, Tractate Ketuboth, verse 111 for this belief. See: http://www.zionism-israel.com/dic/Neturei_Karta.htm "Muhammad", who presumes to state that I have made mistakes in fact, is just plain wrong. Hersh Lowenthal at Jews Against Zionism wrote on the "True Torah Jews Against Zionism" website:

Now, I have seen at various times, "True Torah Jews" state that the Talmud is a part of the Torah, in that it is a record of the Oral Law given to Moses and the Pentateuch is the Written Law given to Moses. Regardless of this semantical issue, the fact remains that Jews, "True Torah Jews" included, view the Talmud as superior to the Pentateuch, which is "water", while the Mishna is "wine" and the Gemara is "spiced wine". Soferim 13b states, "The Bible is like water, the Mishna like wine, and the Gemara like spiced wine." Baba Mezia 33a states that, "to study the Bible is but a waste of time." So in this one brief conversation "Muhammad" has had with Daryl Bradford Smith, he has made several obvious mistakes, but he must go back years to fabricate a basis to attack my credibility for merely stating facts with which he agrees!

That is enough for now. I will go back later and dig up the record on wakeupfromyourslumber.com where I responded to "Muhammad's" attacks on my work--he first criticized my work despite what he now says, and where I asked him questions he did not answer, at least not in a timely fashion. I will see if he has since answered if I can locate the page.

It should be clear to all the great love "Muhammad" has for the Jews. I did not hear him bring himself to state that the Jews control the mass media without provocation from Smith, though he identified the media as if the enemy of humanity.

Unlike "Muhammad", I will say without any hesitation that the Jews are the enemy of humanity, as is clear from the Pentateuch where they are called the Chosen People of God above all others and told to rule over and mass murder the rest of humanity.

So, "Muhammad" will you state unequivocally that you have no Jewish blood, and will you provide us with your birth name and your grandparents' birth names? I ask because you wish to make it clear that you were raised a Christian and converted to Islam, but these are religious, not racial, matters. Are you unaware that there are Christian Jews? Have you studied Cabalah, and if so, why? Please, help me to clear up this matter. I have no intention of misrepresenting your bloodline, and have only relied on what I was told by your friend and what I read in an article bearing your name. If you state unequivocally that you have no Jewish blood and never studied the Cabalah, I believe you acknowledge that you are a convert from Christianity to Islam and are a banker, I will gladly quote you in this blog. I am only interested in the facts. You would, of course, be honored to be considered a Jew, would you not?

Note that since the publication of this article, "Muhammad Rafeeq" has stated that he is a convert from Christianity to Islam and that he was raised as a Christian, and I have no reason to doubt his claim. I have addressed "Muhammad's" response here:

"Way back in 06, when he was still chummy chummy w/DBS - he made some strange & weird comments about prophet Muhammad's death on Daryl's show ( according to Bjerknes, Muhammad was poisoned by the jews and I've never heard such thing in my my life! I've learned & also read in many books that Muhammad died of natural causes.) & Shiite sects were created by the jews - another screwed up story! Both stories made me very skeptical of him.

luckily after that, DBS dropped him."

First of all, Daryl Bradford Smith never "dropped" me. I refused to have anything to do with him despite the fact that he continued to try to contact me. I was always aware of who and what he is, but I'll save that story for another time.

I do not recall ever stating that "Shiite sects were created by the jews", though this is perhaps a reference to the "Hojjatieh" or "Hojjatiya", which I wrote about here:

Rather than making such obscure references to articles I wrote long ago, I wonder why this author did not simply ask "Muhammad Rafeeq" if he is a Jew, instead of casting aspersions on my work? I do not wish to change subjects and my sources on the origin of the Hojjatieh have asked me not to reveal their names so I ask those interested to consider the Frankist nature of the sect and the ethnic origins of those who started it.

It is very well known that many believe that the Prophet Muhammad, as opposed to the Jewish banker "Muhammad", was poisoned by a Jew. See, for example:

Again, I ask, why not simply ask the Jewish banker "Muhammad Rafeeq" if he is a Jewish banker, rather than attacking me?

Or, instead, you could ask his friend and pupil, Daryl Bradford Smith, who has always known that "Muhammad" is a Jewish banker, from a good Jewish banking family, and that "Muhammad" was deep into Cabalah, or so Mr. Smith said. Note that Smith knew this even as he asked all Jews to step aside from the "Truth Movement", while he, Smith, was working with the Jew "Muhammad". Or, you could ask "Muhammad's" friend David Pidcock, who wrote,

But I suggest you ask the Jew himself why he has not made it widely known that he is a Jew and banker from the beginning of his appearances on Daryl Bradford Smith's show, and why Smith did not make it known to his audience that he was working with a Jewish banker, and why Smith called for all Jews to step aside, while working with a Jew. Rather than "shooting the messenger" and attacking me, why not find out the facts?

And while you are at it, ask "Muhammad" why he is offering a defense for Madoff?