Modernized Indigenous Feminism

Why “Smart” Men Still Hold On To Sexism – 5 explanations

I might be the only person not impressed by “the sexist but charming” Christopher Hitchens.

“Why are smart men still sexist?” The question itself is a bad one. Why do we presume smarter people possess better ethics? Well, it is because we are ableist. Ableism is the systematic maltreatment and disenfranchisement of people with disabilities. One’s moral code has much to do with their socialization and their integrity, and little to do with their intellectual capacity. You and I could be brilliant and evil, or we could be not-so-brilliant and kind hearted. Nonetheless, societal attitudes teach us to possess contempt for intellectually disabled persons. So much so that we presume those with high intellectual capacities to be superior.

If a man reinforces the societal idea that women are inferior to men in anyway, we should refrain from attacking his intellect and aptly scrutinize his moral code. Men are sexist, not because they are intellectually unable to understand why gender should not be a basis of social hierarchies but rather for psychological, sociological, and individual selfish reasons. This post discusses 5 of the many reasons that many smart, educated, men continue to reinforce men’s assigned superior social position at the expense of women.

The entire society is structured such that women possess less power, in terms of economic sustainability, social status, and political representation.

Denial of Sexism By Men

Nonetheless, a major impediment to eradicating systematic sexism is the refusal to acknowledge the existence of women’s subjugation, and the severity of sexism on the physical, psychological, emotional, and sexual well-being of women and girls in Ghana. Women’s inferior social position, while obvious, is denied by many men (and women with sexist value systems). Conversations that discuss how women are subjected to worse treatment socially, politically, and economically are often derailed by men.

Acknowledging women’s marginalization would mean men would have to admit to themselves that they are the kinds of humans who: (a) ignore the oppression,(b) participate in the oppression, (c)benefit from the oppression, and (d) do nothing to eradicate the oppression of their fellow human beings, simply because they are women. For many men who view themselves as “good”, this poses a threat to their sense of self.

Denying The Existence Of Sexism To Avoid Self-Implication

A large motivation for the continued denial of sexism in Ghana is men’s unwillingness to implicate themselves individually and as a social class. Discussions of sexism directly implicate men for possessing sexist ideas. Discussions of sexism implicate men for remaining silent when their male peers discuss the ways that they harass, abuse, look down their nose at women, and even rape women. Discussions of sexism directly implicate men for the ways in which they benefit from sexism. For every woman denied university admissions because of education inequity, a man benefits. For every women that is denied access to political infrastructure because of the “old boys” network of politics, a man is granted an opportunity. For every woman that is fired because of sexual harassment, a decision to take maternal leave, workplace discrimination etc., men are granted work opportunities. The uncomfortable truth is that men benefit, and often take very little action against women’s marginalization. While many men are uncomfortable with being described as morally unjust oppressors, few men take any action to dismantle a sexist society that places them in a superior social position to women.

Avoiding The Subject Position of Morally Unjust Oppressor

Individuals that are part of social classes that oppress (heterosexuals, men, wealthy, able-bodied etc.) have several options. One option is to deny that oppression is occurring so one can maintain a clean conscience. Another option is to admit yet ignore the burden of eradicating oppression. The third is to admit the existence of oppression and to strive to eradicate it. Out of all these options only the third option allows one to be a morally just oppressor. As many men do not fall in the third category, they rely on the denial of women’s systematic subordination to appease their conscience and avoid guilt.

To avoid the position of morally unjust oppressor men often derail conversations about sexism with:

“it happens to men too”:- men often argue that sexism is a two-way street to relieve their conscience.

Response: Not on the same scale, and not systematically pleighboi. Sure bad things happen to men, and sure men are stifled by sexism, but the system of women’s domination is NOT a two-way street. Women specifically, historically and presently, are denied privileges and access to resources on the basis of their gender. Men are the holders of political economic, and social power in Ghana and in the world.

“not all men”: men often create a distance between they themselves, and other sexist men to alleviate the implication of themselves.

“it’s the natural way of things”: men often rely on deterministic world-views that necessitate women’s subjugation as a necessary outcome of human living.

Response: there is nothing “natural” about the intentional socialization of children into gender roles, the disparity in job access, education, political representation etc. that explains the men and women’s unequal social positions. Sexism is wholly socially engineered.

“it’s been happening since the beginning of time”: apathy and nihilism are the chosen means of response of men who are too cowardly to take any action against sexism. Such attitudes present sexism as uncontrollable and the necessary outcome of human living.

Response: we humans create culture. We humans make society. We humans, can thus un-make any aspect that we do not desire.

Acknowledging women’s marginalization would mean men would have to admit to themselves that (a)there is a problem ,(b) they participate in the problem, (c)they benefit from the problem, and (d) that for the most part they themselves are doing nothing to eradicate that problem. Men would have to admit that they are not as morally upright as they previously believed themselves to be, for the ways in which they refuse to take action against sexism.

2. Lack of Empathy

The effects of patriarchy on the pscyhe on men causes an inability to see women as full humans. As the holders of power, the continuation of patriarchy requires men to see women as sub-human. It requires men to be able to freely and nonchalantly enact violence against women. It requires men to be comfortable calling women “bitches” and “hoes” maliciously, blaming women for men’s decision to rape women, or failing to consider what women endure psychologically when forced to prioritize men instead of women’s own dreams and careers.

In order for men to subjugate women, men must see women as less, and seeing women as less means failing to empathize with women as people.

Even worse, seeing women as less means the only way that men can empathize with women is if women are related to men themselves: as lovers, girlfriends, sisters, wives, and mothers.

Essentially, men can only empathize with women when women are presented as some extension of men’s own identities.

Seeing women as less means men must fail to consider how sexism affects women’s mental, physical, and emotional health. Seeing women as less means men must fail to consider the destructive impact of the phrase “slut”, “whore”, “bitch”, “ashawo” on women’s humanity. Seeing women as less means must fail to consider the impact of rape jokes on women’s wellbeing. It means men must fail to see women as people deserving of their compassion.

For women to elicit compassion from men, women must be family members, friends, children, or intimate partners. Essentially, the result of dehumanization is: for men to empathize with women, women must represent some extension of men’s own personhood, through familial, platonic, or romantic relationships.

The inability to empathize with women as people informs men’s sexist attitudes. The kind that nonchalantly accept worse treatment for women simply because they’re women.

How then will men be moved to act in the best interest of women, if men cannot see before them a full person when the person is packaged in the identity of womanhood?

3. A Lack of Experience With Gender Based Dehumanization

I never fail to be disappointed in men who want racial equality but don't mind gender inequality

Since men are the beneficiaries of sexism, men do not experience the harsh, destructive ramifications of sexism. Men thus seek to understand sexism 1. intellectually, or 2. by witnessing the experiences of women. The lack of personal experience, with subjugation on the basis of gender, is why Black men who oppose white supremacy embrace patriarchy. The everyday experiences of women are filled with a reminder of women’s inferior social position. So normalized is sexism, that to the untrained eye it seems like regular human behavior. For example, it is a normalized part of girls/women’s life to constantly observe and consider the reality of rape and sexual assault. Girls and women are targeted by family members, by teachers, by strangers, by boyfriends, and even by husbands. A reality that most men mildy understand during bouts of anxiety when contemplating the reality of incarceration.

When a man states “I don’t mind being called a hoe”, what he really means is “because the word ‘hoe’ cannot substantively apply to me, I don’t know what it feels like for someone to disrespect me, strip me of worth, or attack my humanity for my sexual choices.”

The jokes that many men make are telling. “I don’t mind being sexually harassed.” “I wouldn’t mind some objectification.” “Call me a hoe, I don’t care.” It is clear that men lack the real life experiences to understand underlying subtext in the above quotes. To be a man is to have a lower chance of having your career stalled after years of education and work experiences because of the sexual desires of powerful men in one’s work place. Being sexually harassed means having a more powerful man make advancements and claims to one’s body in exchange for the opportunity to make an income. Many men don’t see that. They see an opportunity for women to fuck their way to the top. Never stopping to think:

“if sex was a guaranteed mechanism for career advancement, wouldn’t there be more women represented at the top in numerous fields?”

The lack of experience with the gender based degradation of women, makes the harm of sexism that much more difficult for men to grasp.

4. Myth of A Meritocracy Informs A Superior Male Complex

Those who do not believe that systematic gender inequality accounts for societal disparities among men and women, explain these disparities with the myth of men’s superiority.

Men who are not well versed in the ways in which systems of inequality stunt women’s opportunities and development, interpret sexist societal outcomes as evidence of men’s superiority.

Widely disseminated social ideas often hide inequality by suggesting that hard work and brilliance is the key to accessing necessary resources. People granted with more opportunities on the basis of their gender, race, familial wealth, networks etc. often insist that it is their rugged individualism that accounts for the systematic disparities in social, political, and economic power.

5. Unwillingness To Give Up Advantageous Superior Social Position

Many men like sexism. They’re comfortable in a sexist society that gives them the power to dominate and subjugate women. They’re comfortable with living in a society that says that they are better and smarter than women. They thrive as social norms excuse their infidelity (fauxnogamy) ,and even provide excuses for male rapists when the blame is shifted onto the victim. Men are comforted and promised a nanny, maid, cook, and ego-massager in a partner. They are promised wives who will clean after them, feed them, raise their children, and prioritize their husbands over their own well-being. In a sexist society, to be a man is to thrive at the expense of women.

Would you willingly give up the opportunity to dominate a group of people. To be understood as superior in most ways? To have a servant in your partner; one who cooks, cleans, births your children and feeds your ego on command? To be assigned leadership positions simply because of your gender? To cheat? If you were a man would you possess the integrity to reject all the benefits of patriarchy?

For many men, gender equity would threaten everything that they hold dear. Gender equity would mean that women may be placed in positions of power over them in the work force. It may mean that they would lose the default title as “head of the household”. Gender equity would mean that they would have to clean around the house a lot more. It would mean that their wives’ careers are just as important as theirs, and that their philandering ways would no longer be tolerable.

For many men, gender equity means that they would be on par with those that they gain confidence from imagining themselves as superior to. For many men gender equity is undesireable because it would necessitate a loss of social power to dominate and subjugate, and thus sexist attitudes among men continue to prevail.

Why are smart men sexist? Because they lack the integrity, experience, compassion, and understanding of systems of inequality to be feminist.

Many things. For starters stand up to other men. Sexist men in particular must be confronted. and men have the social power to do. Another thing to do is to give women opportunities in every avenue that one is in. hire women, pay women, allow women to soar. Do not silence women, and seek to treat women as competent persons equal in social status.

In my experience, it’s been difficult standing up for women against sexism because:

1. Many women, through no fault of theirs, prefer the traditionally submissive nature of a woman which the patriarchal Ghanaian society has carved them into.

2. Many women do not see the significant role men have to play in changing the socially acceptable nature of sexism. Men with genuine efforts to curtail gender imbalance have had their every move questioned and have been called names like “sympathetic feminists” and “benevolent feminist men”.

3. The simple fact that some good natured men are simply ignorant of these issues (as ignorant as some women I might add) is downplayed to the point where they’re deemed active culprits of sexism.

It is difficult to be voice against sexism when parts of posts like yours on women being called/treated like queens have discredited the genuineness of restoring the once African way of holding women in high regard and reducing these actions to further less obvious sexist actions.

Ghanaian men like myself who are socially woke and seeking that our women are treated by themselves and the rest of society with more respect and equity worthy of every human being, are tired. While tackling the patriarchal upbringing which has been the focal point of our very existence as African men, we also have to deal with antagonistic perspectives of us along with other men who will rape and kill to keep their social position atop women intact. Don’t get me wrong, we aren’t claiming to be victims. It’s pretty clear to us who the victims are because we feel our social strength daily. But we are all culpable of the problem of sexism one way or the other. It’d be far more helpful to work with men rather than antagonize them. The more of your posts I read, the more bitterness I become aware of. It is justified but at some point the real issue needs to be focused on together.

If sexism were easy to undermine, we would have done it already. As a man you have the social power to stand up to other men. I can understand that it is frustrating Mantse, but the costs of failing to take any action at all is too high. I wish you the best of luck and you can always email me with your experiences (ghanafeminism@gmail.com). But I still maintain that a good course of action to take is to stand up to other men and in little ways give women as much opportunity as possible. The society will not change overnight, but a failure to act means it won’t change at all.

This is excellent and very well written. As a cishetero black man I appreciate you sharing this. There’s much work for us to do. And lots of transformative sessions could be had using this post as a study guide.

Thank you for sharing the post. I took time to read it and the ideas shared were to an extent unfamiliar to me which made it more valuable. Rarely as men do we stop for a second to imagine ourselves as women to experience the gender inequalities present in the system.

A certain gentleman once said, you can know everything there is about the human phenomenon called love but until you experience it, you will never understand it.

I think sexism is similar to love in the regard but even more complicated given that I am naturally blocked from ever experiencing it.

“Everything around you that you call life was made up by people that were no smarter than you. And you can change it, you can influence it… Once you learn that, you’ll never be the same again.” – Steve Jobs

The sexist system today was created by men with the help of women but it can also be redesigned by the same. I think we need to stop seeing only the women as victims and think about the men too. The moment you attack the men, like millipedes they will close themselves from understanding and no progress will be achieved.

“No one is born hating another person because of the color of his skin, or his background, or his religion. People must learn to hate, and if they can learn to hate, they can be taught to love, for love comes more naturally to the human heart than its opposite.” – Nelson Mandela

Mandela spoke from the context of racism but I believe his thoughts are still relevant on the subject of sexism. Men are not the problem but rather the system. The change desired cannot be achieved by women alone, they need the support of men.

The branding of ‘feminism’ is to an extent even detrimental to the desired societal change. Its a brand that sounds and appears feminine. Men should be given an opportunity to participate. Do not brand men as sexist just because the traditions they picked up from society are sexist. Sexist defines their identity based on their flaws. That very definition makes men defensive.

smh. defending men’s reputation, rather than women’s lives is the crux of the issue. I implore men to stop being defensive cowards and just face the reality. Do your best to eradicate this system, rather than doing your best to maintain a reputation that alleviates your conscience

It’s okay for you to disagree with mutambuze’s post, but responding with “smh” and “stop being [a] defensive coward” … this doesn’t help the cause you care so much about. At least mutambuze’s tone was respectful, even if what he said doesn’t line up with what you believe.

This attitude I see online of “you’re either with me or against me” upsets me. It turns could-be allies into enemies (or at least prevents them from finding their way to an understanding).

It’s okay for you to disagree with mutambuze’s post, but responding with “smh” and “stop being [a] defensive coward” … this doesn’t help the cause you care so much about. At least mutambuze’s tone was respectful, even if what he said doesn’t line up with what you believe.

This attitude I see online of “you’re either with me or against me” upsets me. It turns could-be allies into enemies (or at least prevents them from finding their way to an understanding).

For men, discussions of sexism are an intellectual exercise. You are afforded the privilege to respectfully debate women’s lives. This is the the crux of tone policing. Asking men as a social class to stop being defensive cowards is not an attack. It is asking men to rise beyond psychological defense mechanisms that constantly leave them attempting to save face, rather than attempting to deal with systematic inequality. Brian. It’s said you don’t like online discourse, I myself hate the reality of sexism more than I despise how acceptable, normative, conversations.

There is a very good reason why most girls/women gaining education would probably find themselves attached to the idea of being a feminist but would not like to be tagged as one.It is due to the notion that Feminists are always ready to “attack” or “fight back” in any given situation. Notions which could be backed by examples everyday. However I find the need for people reading such articles with touchy issues to be very open minded and objective in their reading and discussion doing away with sentiments to be able to really dissect the issue at hand. Of course,there is an argument of every objectivity coming from a line of subjective views,but in todays world,where people identify with a movement and would stand by it on any given opportunity, the art of reading and discussing without too much subjective meaning taken from what someone has written or commented is a very essential art. Enough being said,I really enjoyed this reading and have learnt a few things. I found a friend reading and followed up with no idea it was from Ghana till I saw a mention in the article and realized the web page. Working on submitting a piece for publication soon.

Reblogged this on FindPalava Woman and commented:
1. Moral Cowardice
2. Lack of Empathy
3. A Lack of Experience With Gender Based Dehumanization
4. Myth of A Meritocracy Informs A Superior Male Complex
5. Unwillingness To Give Up Advantageous Superior Social Position