Search This Blog

Subscribe to this blog

Follow by Email

Online engagement and learning in practice at Harvard and MIT

For the next part of my journey I visited the beautiful Harvard campus. I met with a number of scientists that use social media and a number of social media managers.

Harvard

Harvard is really easy to get to on the T line and is a beautiful campus to explore. The graduations had taken place the day before. There were lots of tents and food-trucks set up around the campus and a really vibrant atmosphere. It helped that the sun came out too!

Here's a video round-up of my visit - no hair in my face this time!

Between meetings I took a quick tour of the Harvard Museum of Natural History which has some incredible collections.

My favourite exhibit in the museum is the glass flower collection, which I stumbled upon by accident. I thought these were persevered flowers but they they were all made from glass for the teaching of botany.

Yep, not a real flower...

Cabinets of glass flowers at the Harvard Museum of Natural History

The museum is really active on Facebook and they host a number of interesting talks and events throughout the year. All the staff were really helpful and knew a lot about the collections. I didn't have long to spend in the museum but it was great to chat with those that I met.

Other than the glass flowers I loved their displays of beetles and insects. So beautiful.

So shiny! Beetles at the Harvard Museum of Natural History

There was also an exhibition on cockroaches and their importance and 'life in a rotting log'. It's great to see the creepy crawlies getting some well deserved attention.

I met with a number of academic staff at Harvard and spoke to them about their online engagement. I also learnt about Harvard's online courses http://harvardx.harvard.edu which are a diverse set of free online courses taught by Harvard staff available for everyone to access.

Many of the courses also support their own Facebook, Twitter and social media pages. These exist not to promote the course but to engage with the students. The pages create their own communities between students and academic staff. The visibility of the questions and discussion stimulates more input in a way that one-to-one conversations via email never could.

I headed back to MIT later in the day and I met with Stephanie Hatch Leishman, Social Media Strategist at MIT, in her fantastically decorated office (she made the icons herself -AMAZING).

We spoke for quite a while about how MIT as in institution approaches social media engagement. I discovered MIT connect , a fantastic example of how a diverse organisation can bring together it's online engagement and output.

There's also #askMIT an outreach initiative led by MIT's engineering school that encourages and promotes online science engagement through video, Facebook and Twitter. Ask the researchers a question and they will answer. This kind of idea isn't new, but I haven't seen an example of it being led at an institutional level before. Formal Social media chats tend to last for a set period of time (1 hr or so) and then vanish so it's great to see a project that keeps building and continues over time.

These are a few perspectives and views from those that I have met so far that I thought were interesting to share:

No Professor or research group lead (or PhD student..) should be managing a group social media output. Write it into a grant and employ someone to do this - it's a full time job to do it properly and get the most from it.

Freedom online is important to make mistakes, learn and develop new areas

MOOCs can create their own social media networks with public audiences and become an engagement platform

Exploit the support networks you can find on social media to help you in your career

This June I am undertaking a Winston Churchill Memorial Trust Fellowship to look at the communication of science via social media. I will be traveling to North America and I am looking to connect with people as I go. You can read more about it here.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Please watch the video below and leave a comment on my blog page (at the bottom of this page) letting me know what you think of the video (giving your current job - you don't need to leave your name). Does it make you want to work in science?

Update 18.7.12

Thanks for all the comments! I forwarded them on to the EU commission that produced the video. They did receive quite a response to the video from across the globe, and a few 10000 blog posts!! Here are a few reflections -

I have promised myself that this year I will be better at sharing information, documents and general things that I have created for training, conference sessions or just for fun.To start 2018, here is a list of different formats in which people communicate science through events. I used it for a discussion with Masters students about the many different forms science communication can take. The list started life as a local one but I am keen to include more international examples. I have included links where appropriate so people can find out more information. Have I missed any? I expect I have...
Talks, comedy and storytelling Lectures - still an important way of communicating science Café Scientifique (and Café MED, if you are in Aberdeen)Bright Club comedy The Cabaret of Dangerous IdeasNerd NiteSkeptics in the PubSci-barPint of ScienceSoapbox scienceSpeed scienceThe Story Collider – science storytelling (and there is a great podcast)PechaKucha Night (not science based, but is a grea…

Post-doctoral researchers in Medical Sciences at the University of Aberdeen were told this week that they need to be publishing, on average, 3.25 papers per year in order to have a competitive chance of getting a research fellowship.

I always get worried when I hear exact numbers being quoted as 'what you NEED to have'. The number, apparently was determined by asking research councils that give fellowship grants what they look for. A good idea in theory, the ones that answered the request said they want (on average) 3.25 papers per year. But do the people that receive fellowships really have that record? That isn't clear.

With a decrease in research council funding is more research being funded by industry? I don't know, as I don't have the numbers. I'm just speculating, but, if you are industry funded my experience has been so far that you are likely to publish less as your results will go towards things like patents and be kept internally for the company. St…