In single-transverse wave theory there are only 2 poles shaped like anL of the E and B waves. In double-transverse wave theory there are 4polesshaped like this:

__|__ |

Shaped like the diagonals of a square.

Now I still have a lot of problems and issues to resolve. Forinstance the rest-mass particles are asymmetrical and have 3 of the 4poles with M's whereas the photon has 4 of the 4 poles and symmetricalof the M's.

Or should the hydrogen atom be more like this:?? 0.5*10^6M-938*10^6M+ 0.25*10^6M-where the 0.25*10^6M- represents the electron-neutrino

So I still have a lot of problems, and the summary was far toopremature.

Now a fact of good note is the fact that the electron travels almostthe speed of light even though it has rest-mass, and I am guessingthat in the accelerators the proton can be made to travel almost thespeed of light. These are good facts because as we get the electron totravel near the speed of light, what we are doing is adding M's to thevacant 4th pole and making the electron to be almost like the photonof its 4 pole occupancy.

Now another fact that is helpful to DTW theory is the fact of overlap.I mentioned earlier that the electron is more primitive than thephoton since it has only 3 poles to the 4 poles occupancy of thephoton. But the photon is more primitive than the electron because itstarts out with its lowest photon far smaller in complexity than thelowest electron. But there is an overlap because the most energeticphoton of gamma rays can be has high as 10 MeV whereas the electronlowest of low electrons is not much more than 1 MeV.

So I need to resolve this issue of when the particle is asymmetricaland has only 3 poles with M's and when the particle is symmetricalwith all 4 poles occupied. When the poles are the vertices of atriangle or the vertices of a square.

Now the smallest lowest particle of all is just 2 poles of theelectron neutrino:M- M+Then the next electron neutrino is 3 poles: M-M- M+

and then the next is 4 poles of the pinwheel: M-M- M+ M+

So I still have a lot of problems and issues to fight off. But this isall new science and so we can expect a lot of issues to fight with.

Google's New-Newsgroups censors AP posts and halted a properarchiving of author, but Drexel's Math Forum does not and my posts?inarchive form is seen here: