Monday, June 29, 2009

Lage and Perez Roque: the Movie

Now we know why Cuban authorities gave out so little information, apart from a terse announcement and a cryptic Fidel Castro reflection, when Vice President Carlos Lage and Foreign Minister Felipe Perez Roque left their jobs last March.

They were making a movie.

Two movies, actually, one three hours long and one six hours long, covering the demise of Lage, Perez Roque, party international relations chief Fernando Remirez, Otto Rivero, an official who was responsible for the Fidel initiative called the “Battle of Ideas,” and Carlos Valenciaga, a member of the Council of State and private secretary to Fidel Castro.

The movies haven’t been released, but they were covered in Spanish-language newspapers, whose Havana correspondents have spoken to Cubans who have seen them, and the three sets of accounts coincide.The videos have apparently been shown to top leaders, and then to Communist Party militants, to show where the dismissed officials went wrong.Each report says there is strict security at each showing of the videos; the audience is required to check cameras, cell phones, and even pens at the door.

The articles from La Jornada are here and here, from El Pais here and here, and from La Vanguardia here.The Herald’s Cuban Colada summarizes here.

Among the many details in the video, according to the reports:

Two key figures, both now under arrest, are Conrado Hernandez, a Cuban national who represented Basque businesses in Cuba, hosted Lage and Perez Roque at his Matanzas farm where their talks were recorded, and admits on tape that he had worked with Spanish intelligence; and Raul Castellanos Lage, a physician and cousin of Carlos Lage.

Castellanos is captured on tape saying it would have been “a service to la patria” if Vice President Machado Ventura had been allowed to die when he was treated for heart problems.

Raul Castro confronted Lage, Perez Roque, Rivero, and Remirez with accusations at a March 2 Political Bureau meeting, portions of which are included in the video.Twenty members are present, but only Raul questions the four.He asks about favors given to Hernandez; Lage ordered that a river be diverted at Hernandez’ farm, and Perez Roque gave him a diplomatic passport.

On February 23, 2008, the day before the National Assembly formally elected Raul Castro president and Machado Ventura first vice president, the Political Bureau of the Communist Party met to make the nominations.All in attendance, including Lage, were told to keep the nominations secret.Lage went from the meeting to a party on the rooftop terrace of the Ambos Mundos hotel, which was ostensibly to celebrate the wedding of Castellanos to the woman with whom he had been living for a decade, but in reality was to celebrate Lage’s nomination to the post of first vice president.A disappointed Lage broke the secret to those in attendance.Later he used a relief pitcher’s metaphor when he told Valenciaga by phone, “They didn’t hand me the ball.”Raul Castro described the scene, saying that what was to be a party “changed to an atmosphere of mourning.”Perez Roque was furious, and vowed to oppose Machado’s nomination in the National Assembly the next day, which he did not do.

Conrado Hernandez left the party and informed Spanish contacts of the Machado nomination.The result is that Madrid knew of Machado’s selection before the National Assembly received the nomination or acted on it.

In September 2006, Carlos Valenciaga held a raucous birthday party in the same Council of State building where Fidel Castro was living through the worst of his illness, “between life and death,” according to Raul.

A viewer told El Pais that the video has two objectives: to expose espionage, and to demonstrate that the accused “were disloyal, permitted abuses, and nurtured ambitions of power.”The government and party seem to be betting that viewers will absorb that message and agree with the removal of Lage, Perez Roque, and Remirez, rather than identify with the disappointment that these elites of Cuba’s next generation, promoted by Fidel and Raul to their top jobs, felt when they thought their moment had come.

This is the prelude to a formal trial which will be held in the near future. The Cuban regime has lifted a page from the Stalin era where the accused were destroyed in the media first and then brought to trial. Back then in the 30's it was Pravda the conduit for these trail ballons. Today is the DVD's and video tapes but the reasoning behind it is the same: to present the accused and deviants and corrupted. All I can say is that it could not have happened to a nicer bunch of guys. It is Saturn devouring its own children. That is what communist revolutions are all about.

I thank Phil for providing all these details. I think the more we learn the more we also understand these were not the right 2 future leaders of Cuba. Cuba's current leaders have obviously bet on it. Petty corruption to help friends, allowing a Spanish spy to set them up so well, allowing personal ambition to mean so much, making comments of poor taste against the leadership, etc.

Roque and Lage should have understood Machado was never a long term choice. He was a choice a stability during a potentially difficult time. Lage and Roque could not wait and their unseemly actions at a critical time cost them. I don't think there are going to be trials, despite the apparent irregularities with the river and passport.

don't you think the Cuban people have a right to choose their own leaders instead of the Communist elite?

The leaders of the Cuban Government are appointed by the (elected) National Assembly, who chooses the Council of State, who then chooses the President and Vice President. It is not that different from Britain, Canada, Israel or Australia - where the people don't directly elect their top leaders, but it is done indirectly in the Parliment. This "communist elite" you speak in the Assembly of are directly elected by the vast majority of the Cuban people.

"making comments of poor taste against the leadership, etc."Imagine that, the gall and audacity of these two of daring to speak up and criticize the leadership. They should be shot for it! What a crime criticizing the leadership. If that was the case in the US peolsi should have been shot a long time ago!What a stupid dimwit this jerk Leftside is!A proud gusano.

@Anonymous, July 1, 2009 7:42 PM "Imagine that, the gall and audacity of these two of daring to speak up and criticize the leadership. They should be shot for it! What a crime criticizing the leadership."

Wow, nobody (before you did!) talked here about shooting anybody. You where the first who had that idea!!! (ok, in a sarcastic way, but the first person nonetheless). Congrats!!! What a nice leader you would make!!! Now, fill us with your infinite wisdom!!! What would you -my leader- do with them?!?! Let them to lead Cuba? to party 'till exhaustion!?! You name it, I will comply!!! Wow I'm so excited!!! I almost wet my pants!!!

"...A proud gusano..."A proud anonymous gusano, I must say.

-----------From leftside, June 30, 2009 2:21 PM: "...It is not that different from Britain, Canada, Israel or Australia..."and Anonymous, June 30, 2009 9:24 PM:"...Uh huh, just like the "elected" leaders of the Third Reich and the Soviet parliament..."

@AnonymousWhat should I infer? Are you comparing "Britain, Canada, Israel or Australia" to the Third Reich and the Soviet Parliament too? Or should I say (paraphrasing yourself): "Anonymous, you are a shameless double standards scumbag"?-----------

My god, YOU have made my day! Hypocritical?!?! Maybe!!! But at least I assume it, unlike you, who dress yourself with a veil of self-righteousness.