In Depth

Noting that its decision should not be viewed as a punishment for either parent, a trial court denied a mother’s request
to move to California with her son and ordered the boy remain in Indiana with his father. The Indiana Court of Appeals
affirmed Friday, finding the father presented evidence that supported the trial court’s decision.

Allison DeCloedt and Shane Wagaman divorced in 2011 when H.W. was two years old. DeCloedt had sole physical and legal custody
of the boy with Wagaman exercising parenting time. DeCloedt remarried in July 2013 and told the court she planned to relocate
to California, where her husband moved for work. Wagaman objected and, after a hearing in which the trial judge said it “preferred
not to make a decision at all,” the trial court granted Wagaman’s petition to modify custody so that H.W. remained
in Indiana and DeCloedt would exercise parenting time.

In a case that the Court of Appeals referred to as a “close case,” the judges affirmed. Both parents testified
the other was a very good parent and there were never any issues with support or visitation prior to DeCloedt’s relocation.
The trial court found that her relocation was in good faith and that father proved the proposed relocation is not in H.W.’s
best interests.

The appeals judges agreed, pointing to the numerous family members H.W. has in Indiana and his current relationship
with them. They rejected mother’s argument that all other things being equal, her role as primary caregiver during H.W.’s
life takes precedence over the other factors the dissolution court was to consider.

“[T]he dissolution court was forced to make a very difficult decision. In the end, the dissolution court found
that it is in H.W.’s best interests to stay in Indiana with his Father and future stepsiblings, with both sets of grandparents
and cousins living nearby,” wrote Judge Edward Najam in Allison I. (Wagaman) DeCloedt v. Shane C. Wagaman, 92A03-1401-DR-39.

Conversations

0 Comments

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or
hateful.

You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.

Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content
are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.

No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are
relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.

We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag
a post simply because you disagree with it.