Am 24.11.2008 um 18:50 schrieb Dave Cridland:
> C2C TLS has numerous carefully audited crypto implementations, and
> one (or two?) test client implementations. Now, arguably, it might
> well have more - I'm not sure how many of the existing XEP-0174
> clients will simply use TLS if offered, which would count in at
> least some respects.
Please name at least two implementation so I can test those :).
> Therefore, in many respects ESessions is already lagging behind C2C
> TLS without anyone actually having done any coding specifically
> toward it.
Well, what about SAS? I still can't see it. And do they use jingle
inband or direct connections? If they use direct connections, is NAT
traversal implemented, using a STUN server etc.?
--
Jonathan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20081124/fed2f4d4/attachment.pgp