Wednesday, 10 September 2014

Naming the Jew. Good or bad tactics?

In the post preceding this a comment thread (I've copied over some comments to this post) has focused on an important issue currently active at Bob Whittaker's BUGS site. I addressed this about a year ago myself in a post entitled Naming The Jew. Even if you've already done so I suggest you nip over and read it again because it is a really important tactical and strategic issue..

Here's an excerpt from that post. "Even if we accept that Jews are the masterminds behind our immigration woes it's counterproductive to emphasise it.....for the reason that it results in instantaneous banishment from 'respectable' society. And as a consequence the more immediate objective of stopping mass black and Muslim immigration gets lost in the storm."
Whereas I don't have a firm view either way they certainly do over at BUGS. They say referring to Jews as the source of our problems, or indeed in any negative light is simply 'bad for the cause' and as such should be abandoned. ("I DEMAND that anyone using BUGS ammunition get OFF, totally OFF, the Jew Addiction.") Another: "If Joo talk really works than how come it never worked in the 60’s? how come it never worked before that? Is it going to work 20 years from now? We have been more effective in a 2-3 year span than the News and Joosers have been for the last 70 years".One comment I certainly agree with is this: "You have to understand, there are untold billions of dollars of social engineering at work telling the average person that talking-about-Jews=anti-Semite and anti-Semite=evil."

One thing we can say for sure though is that even if we don't name them they won't stop attacking us as long as we defend the White race and by extension western civilisation.

So I suggest you read the BUGS post and comment thread and maybe an outcome productive to our cause will emerge from your subsequent input.

196 comments:

I don’t talk about Jewish power and influence, and why you shouldn’t either.

That, and the fact that, left to their own devices, White Europeans, fed up with Jewish power and influence, always expelled the Jews. But someone always let them back in.

Jews are not the real problem. Something at the top of White society is the problem, and it’s been going on for a long time. The problem is less that Jews act in Jewish self-interest and more that Whites are not permitted to act in White self-interest.

The Jew-obsessed are a gift to the traitors who want to ruin White lands because they give them an opportunity to tar everyone who opposes mass immigration with the same "Nazi" brush.

When I talk to friends and family about the problems we face, I sound exactly like a "Nazi" would sound, minus the Jew obsession, and I have found that it puts people off from the overall message because it's difficult for them to trust that I don't want to start shoving people in ovens or smashing up businesses (and people).

There are millions and millions of people who oppose immigration but who do not wish to have anything to do with these perceived "Nazis". These people are prevented from speaking their mind because they do not want to be associated with "Nazis" but know that they would be, because the "Nazis" share some of the same concerns.

If only an intellectual case could be made for preventing what is happening to us without it having to resort to becoming an obsession with Jews.

Some people have been on this blog before who have not towed the party line of "everything is the Jews' fault" and they have been dismissed as "paid hasbaras". But if you think about it, if anyone is being paid, it is far more likely to be the ones who are doing the real damage to the fight against mass immigration, and that is the Jew-obsessed idiots who make it so easy for the anti-immigration movement as a whole to be attacked.

"Bob brought up Sarkozy’s statement about White genocide. Some guy posted to yahoo answers about that, except he called him “Jew Sarkozy.” The result was predictable. Even though Sarkozy had gone on record threatening unspecified acts of genocide against White Europeans, no one cared. All anyone wanted to talk about was whether he was a Jew or whether the author was an anti-Semite."-------------------

And what is wrong with that? The genocide of Whites is a not the issue there, it's all about Sarkozy.

"That’s why I don’t talk about Jewish power and influence, and why you shouldn’t either."-------This is nonsense White BUG. We must identify our enemy in order to defeat them, even if it shocks people. You are encouraging the front line to retreat.

Others, behind the lines, like BUGS, may use milder, less confrontational methods of course to do their bit.

"That, and the fact that, left to their own devices, White Europeans, fed up with Jewish power and influence, always expelled the Jews. But someone always let them back in."-----------And I'm sure in all those expulsions they talked about the damn jews. The last great expulsion was done by the National Socialists. I think they talked a little bit about jews, under their breath, of course:)

And that someone was bribed, blackmailed or coerced into opening the gates.

"Jews are not the real problem. Something at the top of White society is the problem, and it’s been going on for a long time."----------

Really? Who or what agent is at the top of White society that is the cause then?

Answer: it's back to jewish money power: able to bribe, blackmail or eliminate any White resistance that doesn't go along with the program.

"The problem is less that Jews act in Jewish self-interest and more that Whites are not permitted to act in White self-interest."--------------

And what's the reason for that? It's jewish self interest to make sure that they kill any and all White self interest movements in the cradle.

It's not as if jews just root for their own team. They actively poison, kill and destroy all other teams without scruple. We are dealing with eery evil and intelligent psychopaths here with a genocidal plan.

I had a look at that BUGs site thread.

Some thoughts:

* It's a good way of getting the message out for those not wanting to name the enemy. This is actually a very good method of creating gradual yet potential awareness about the enemy among the masses.

* Bob's hatred, not of jews but of White traitors. WTF is this? Traitors are commonplace and deserve a very different type of hatred that real enemies deserve.

* Bob not liking the "jewsters" using his Mantras as it associates the Mantras with them and soils the message. Fair enough. But let's remember, it's the Bugs people who are free riding on the coat tails of the "jewsters,"

* The classroom vs War analogy is not helpful. We are always in both.

* Some of the commenters are crowing about how the "jewsters" haven't achieved much. For example Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh, etc. Well these bugsters can be likened to dwarves standing on the shoulders of giants and boasting how tall they are.

Whatever Bugsters are doing it rests on the foundational work done and being done by those people naming the jew.

That all said, the Bugster approach is to be encouraged as is any other intermediate approach.

But the sharp end of the spear will be those willing to name jews (and the White traitors, of course) as the organized force behind our racial destruction

Blaming whites and excusing the jew is what jews want. How is that hard to see? Its not us its those Whites who are to blame not is always innocent jews. Its sad to see this thought process spreading to excuse jews...

Another troll here to excuse the jew and blames Whites. Who wins with this new manta? It sure isn't Whites. Who wins blaming Whites? jews win. Who wants jews to win? jews, so you can now see why this clever anti white meme is hitting hard on blogs. Stop focusing on us jews you silly goyim and instead do as we do and blame Whites for every single thing on this Earth. Excusing the pathogen by blaming the pathology. Pathology would not exist without a pathogen.

Others, behind the lines, like BUGS, may use milder, less confrontational methods of course to do their bit.

BUGS is at the front line, making a big difference. Nick Griffin's BUGS-esque speech at the EU parliament was possibly his most powerful ever. Everyone's going BUGS now. It seems to work better. While me must all be aware of the Zionist menace, talking in public about evil plotting Jews appears to backfire so often that its worth considering a slightly different approach. Attack them if you must, but consider attacking them as anti-whites rather than as Jews. Then they can't use the anti-Semitic NAZI defence which instantly books you on the express coach to loserville. Our side might even chalk up a minor victory once in a while - that would be a novelty.

More anti-Whites to excuse the jew and blames Whites. Who wins with this new manta? It sure isn't Whites. Who wins blaming Whites? jews win. Who wants jews to win? jews, so you can now see why this clever anti white meme is hitting hard on blogs. Stop focusing on us jews you silly goyim and instead do as we do and blame Whites for every single thing on this Earth. Excusing the pathogen by blaming the pathology. Pathology would not exist without a pathogen.

Commentator Jason on the BUGS thread says this. "Those poor Whites who stab other Whites in the back can’t be blamed. The Jews made them do it! They used their secret mind-control techniques, don’t you know? "

Well wise guy that is fucking exactly what they do with their not so secret mind-control techniques. All of them on that site want to give jews a pass because Whites have been so brainwashed.

We can agree that St Nilus does an outstanding job in documenting the rot in the UK media and its real source.

We can agree that Jews do what Jews do.

I think Bob has a point. Talking about it just entangles you in the Jewish question and stifles advancement. I'm sure another approach can work. There are plenty of people doing nothing who can get involved without having to tackle the Jewish question. That's a tough question. The Anti-White question is still tough but 1488 times easier than the J question and therefore worth recruiting people for.

Why can't we agree on that too?

I'm not saying stop talking about Jews on this blog - I mean, that's what this blog is about isn't it? Just out in the wide world, talk about anti-whites more.

As soon as you say "Jews", nobody wants to listen anymore. It's just too hard to figure out.

If you say the world is full of anti-whites, people listen. They understand. They know anti-whites. They see them on TV. They may even be an anti-white. The Jewish conspiracy angle is just too complex a topic. It doesn't explain innocent Jews well enough. It takes years of study to get and even then just causes arguments that simply won't stop until Ragnarok.

Small-town Jews here in Ohio identify as "white" for some reason. I get along with some of them.

The wife worked for a Jewish hardware store owner, a strictly family business, paid good money and protested industrial out-sourcing, immigration and the whole crap-fest of One-Worldism I could never get fellow whites worked up about.

Was he a plant?

I don't think so. Lots of assimilated Jews never accepted the Agenda. My take is that in a crunch, they just plain won't BE Jews and will align themselves with Europeans.

Not sure, me, and don't know how many fit this description. We may find out the hard way though.

. Bob is wrong and so in anybody not naming the jew. If not for the jew we would not even be having this debate.

So you think it helps our cause by naming the jew? Maybe it does but as one reader said, some of the most powerful and prestigious men in America (H Ford, Lindberg) were destroyed for doing it. And that was before they had Hitler to frighten us with.

The point being made is that if you obsess about Jews then you harm the overall effort to stop and reverse the immigration.

You can't stop and reverse the immigration UNLESS you stop obsessing about Jews because you will never be able to gain the power to do so. People will not listen to people who obsess about Jews. They haven't done for 70 years and they will not do so any time soon.

Once you have the power to stop and reverse immigration, you also have the power to obsess about Jews to your heart's content without serious opposition and you can go after them all you want.

But hey who am I kidding. The Jew obsession has nothing to do with solving our problems. It exists for its own sake. It is like a religion. The Jew-obsessed live to obsess about Jews. We could live in a perfect world and the Jew-obsessed would still need to obsess about Jews.

What's unfortunate though is that whilst our problems get worse, efforts to better our condition are hamstrung by those who feel compelled to obsess about Jews.

Those 1400+ raped White girls in Rotherham could have been prevented if, decades earlier, the Jew-obsessed hadn't ruined any efforts to prevent the immigration. But it was more important to them to obsess about Jews than it was to save the country and the people or to stop these girls from being raped.

Jew-obsessors are enemies of White people just the same as the White traitors the likes of which we saw on Rotherham council. When the Muslim is slitting his throat, the last words of the Jew-obsessor will be "b-b-but Larry Silverstein didn't turn up for work on 911 which means it must have been a Jewish plot. Oh, and did you know that the Queen is a Jew and has $100 trillion in gold hidden on the Moon?".

This is fantastic you bugs people are really outing yourselves and your true jewish motives. Excuse the jew and blame Whites. Try your garbage and the newbies. Its you who doesnt not get it. Yet you are here slamming Whites while professing to be pro Whit

Who gains by not naming the jew? Who doesn't want you to know it is them? Who wants you to blame Whites for everything? Jews win. Basically these bugs guy are anti-White and pro jewish. They push to biggest of jew memes. Blame whites excuse the jew. It is White doing this not us jews. How can any of you not see this?

“Some people have been on this blog before who have not towed the party line of "everything is the Jews' fault" and they have been dismissed as "paid hasbaras",” says the little nose behind the curtain.

LOL!!!

The little nose behind the curtain said: “But if you think about it, IF ANYONE IS BEING PAID, it is far more likely to be...the JEW-OBSESSED IDIOTS who make it so easy for the anti-immigration movement as a whole to be attacked.”

Hahahahaha!

So tell us oh enlightened one, who are these “Jew-obsessed idiots” who are being paid, and who’s paying them?

Once you figure out if they are Jewish or not, then you figure out if they are anti-white or not. Or is it the other way around?

I think its easier to fight anti-whites than Jews. By easier I mean possible personally to make some sort of difference with them.

As Bob says, do what works not what feels good.

Repeat after me: Barbara Spectre is an anti-white. Richard Coudenhouve Kalergi was an anti-white. Tim Wise is an anti-white. Noel Ignatiev is an anti-white.

What hurts Jews more: being called Jews, or being called anti-whites?

Calling a Jew a Jew is sort of pointless. Do it if you like, but at least call them anti-white too while you are at it. I don't think they are all anti-white, but I do know that Nazis even make whites anti-white.

Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case which held that courts could not enforce RACIAL COVENANTS on REAL ESTATE.

The Solicitor General's brief filed on behalf of the United States government was written by four JEWISH lawyers: PHILIP ELMAN, OSCAR DAVIS, HILBERT ZARKY, AND STANLEY SILVERBERG. However, the Solicitor General’s office chose to OMIT THEIR NAMES FROM THE BRIEF. The principal assistant to the Solicitor General, ARNOLD RAUM, who was also JEWISH, stated that it was "bad enough that Perlman’s name has to be there, to have one Jew’s name on it, but you have also put four more Jewish names on. That makes it look as if a bunch of Jewish lawyers in the Department of Justice put this out.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelley_v._Kraemerhttp://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/speeches/viewspeeches.aspx?Filename=sp_02-18-02.html

Hilbert Philip Zarky

In 1947, Zarky co-authored the Solicitor General's amicus brief in Shelley v. Kraemer, urging the Supreme Court to STRIKE DOWN racially restrictive covenants. However, his name and that of the other Jewish co-authors were stricken out of concern that it would appear that "a bunch of Jewish lawyers in the Department of Justice put this out.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_Philip_Zarky

Philip Elman

A former law professor at Georgetown University and the University of Hawaii, Philip Elman made his GREATEST CONTRIBUTION in the relatively UNKNOWN ROLE HE PLAYED in the landmark 1954 Brown v. Board of Education SCHOOL DESEGREGATION LAWSUIT.http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPcap/1999-12/05/018r-120599-idx.html

Brown v. Board of Education

On May 17, 1954 the United States Supreme Court handed down its ruling in the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. The Court’s unanimous decision overturned provisions of the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision, which had allowed for “separate but equal” public facilities, including public schools in the United States. Declaring that “separate educational facilities are inherently unequal,” the Brown v. Board decision helped break the back of state-sponsored segregation, and provided a spark to the American civil rights movement.

Civil rights leader Rev. Jesse Jackson has called on Google and other tech companies to diversify tech hiring

70 percent of Google's employees are men and 61 percent of its U.S. employees are white, according to a workforce diversity report released by the company.

Google's response? Increase the anti-white levels.

"....we're the first to admit that Google is miles from where we want to be--and that being totally clear about the extent of the problem is a really important part of the solution," wrote Laszlo Bock, Google's senior vice president for People Operations, in a blog post.

Google and other tech companies have been under pressure to release employee diversity data from U.S. civil rights leader Rev. Jesse Jackson who raised the issue at a Google annual meeting earlier this month. Google Chief Legal Officer David Drummond stated at the meeting that Google would release its data.

"Put simply, Google is not where we want to be when it comes to diversity, and it's hard to address these kinds of challenges if you're not prepared to discuss them openly, and with the facts." Bock wrote.

There are lots of reasons why technology companies like Google struggle to recruit and retain women and minorities. For example, women earn roughly 18 percent of all computer science degrees in the United States. Blacks and Hispanics each make up under 10 percent of U.S. college grads and each collect fewer than 10 percent of degrees in CS majors. So we’ve invested a lot of time and energy in education.

So women and minorities are already over-represented at google. Never mind that White men do good work, to hell with them. DIVERSIFY!

So there you go. Bock must be a Jew. Please, could everyone please spread the word that Bock is a Jew.

I'll tell people he is an anti-white instead and that being totally clear about the extent of the problem is a really important part of the solution.

Savant said: “One thing we can say for sure though is that even if we don't name them they won't stop attacking us AS LONG AS WE DEFEND the White race and by extension western civilisation.”

Savant,

The vast majority of the 223 million whites in the United States DON’T DEFEND the white race (Note: in 2012 the majority of Obama’s total vote nationwide came from white voters), yet this doesn’t stop the Jew-controlled media (Hollywood, ad agencies, news media, TV etc) from attacking the white race 24/7. So, regardless of whether or not whites DEFEND the white race, they will still come under attack from the Jew.

There seem to be three elements in this. a) Rotherham-type rapistsb) White race traitors (the useful idiots) and c) the real wire-pullers.Deal with a), and there will be howls of racism, and you will be cast into outer darkness, while the actual criminal will enjoy a tsunami of public sympathy. Deal with c) and hark unto the howls of Nazism thus entrained; outer darkness, public sympathy, tsunami, and so forth. Deal effectively with b) however, and how will racism stack up where the party is white, or nazism be credible where the party is clearly a gentile?Do this, and the pavement apes will sense that their immunity is being undermined; also the real wirepullers will find useful idiots that bit harder to find. Do this, and Joe Public may even gain a glimmer of understanding about all this.

"So, regardless of whether or not whites DEFEND the white race, they will still come under attack from the Jew. "

Frank, I freely acknowledge that. The point that I made before though, and the same one made at BUGS is, irrespective of what Jews do, attacking them elicits a response from the general public that is negative to the WN cause.

This then raises the question that really matters: Can we fight the cause of WN more effectively if we do not openly identify the main instigators of the attack on us?

It seems like a crazy proposition on the face of it but given the stranglehold of the Jewish narrative maybe it is the best course and let people discover it themselves in due course.

If you bugs really cared for the White cause you would not be putting Whites down for naming our enemy. Now savant has sipped your kool aid and he will blog not naming the jew. Newbies will read it and them blames whites and not the jew... Good work guys, lets help Whites by blaming them.......

Basically these bugs guy are anti-White and pro jewish. They push to biggest of jew memes. Blame whites excuse the jew. It is White doing this not us jews. How can any of you not see this?

Because it's <not what they're saying. Jesus Christ can YOU not see that? They are NOT excusing Jews, they just say that if you openly blame them you shoot yourself in the foot and set back the WN cause. Bob even said somewhere that as Whites get awakened they get to realise the large number of Jewish names in all the anti-White projects.

Savant I have mentioned the jews in many conversations lately with a variety of different types of people, black, white, indian, gay and even liberals and many agreed about the evil intentions of jews and were very aware of jewish destruction in various areas .......banking , monsanto...etc. Things are changing fast and many people are becoming aware of what a huge problem the jews pose.They are truly becoming very unpopular.Just pick your audience before speaking out or find another way of entering the conversation.Like Goldman Sachs for example.

People know things and when the anti white agenda is pointed out it all start to make sense.

TWO teenagers who sexually assaulted a 15-year-old schoolgirl in a Galway apartment, recording some of the incident on a mobile phone, have been jailed for 18 months each for the assault.

SHAREHarvey Simukonda (19), originally from Malawi but living in Athlone, pleaded guilty to the defilement, or statutory rape, of the young girl two years ago.

Jesse Edokpayi (19), from Dublin, pleaded guilty to the sexual assault of the girl on the same date. Both men were 17 at the time.

The Central Criminal Court heard how on August 1, 2012, during Race Week, the young girl and a friend had accompanied Simukonda to an apartment, where she was given vodka and was in an intoxicated state.

She was later brought to a toilet by Simukonda where they had sex twice. The court heard that the schoolgirl's trouser buttons had been ripped off and zipper damaged.

In a second incident later that evening, the victim was brought to a bedroom where she was sexually assaulted by Edokpayi as the incident was recorded on a mobile phone.

Video footage was played to the court of the schoolgirl lying in an almost comatose state on a bedroom floor as Edokpayi attempted to coax her to have sex. He admitted to digitally penetrating the girl.

"So many people on here just do not get it. BUGS are not excusing the jews and neither is Savant. BUGS say that naming the jews is COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE. That is all. Repeat: That is all they are saying."

They know this.

They are trying to protect their religious-style needs, which is to obsess and fantasize about Jews.They are upset that someone is trying to take this away from them.Understand that the ruination of White society is of marginal interest to these people compared to their need to obsess and fantasize about Jews.Even if all out problems were solved tomorrow, they'd still be harping on about dancing Israelies.

In the meantime though, White girls by the thousand are being raped by Muslim gangs and our efforts to prevent this are being hampered by the poison within the anti-immigration movement, namely the Jew-obsessors, who frighten everyone else into silence.

People like Frank Galton and Uncle Nasty could almost be Barbara Lerner Spectre in disguise considering their pro-immigration efforts.

BUT..BUT..The ANTI JEW meme is stronger than at any time since the 30s! It IS working. Most people are happy to hear about it, so I dont know what this BUGS crap is about.

I went fishing last night off Brighton Marina, took a few beers, ended up talking to a bloke for 5 hourts all about the jews, the pakis, the blacks, the anti-White agenda.

He loved it, agreed with every word.

He even said at one point,

"I sometimes think that Hitler was right" I replied "He was right...and the things he did wrong..NEVER HAPPENED. The holocaust is a bullshit racket, for the jews crimes to hide behind"

He'd also noticed the blatant race-mixing agenda on TV and Ads, etc.

Just a random bloke I happened to be fishing next to.

So youve got crowds protesting jews in France, youve got all the world witnessing the slaughter and destruction in Gaza, youve got all the muzzies and the hardcore Catholics round the world who dont exactly like jews,Mein Kamf a big seller in Japan, India, etc, youve got jews being booted out of that place in Paruguay for being: TYPICAL OBNOXIOUS ARROGANT JEWS, youve got jews, jews, jews, blatantly all over the TV and cinema, the entire world HATES bankers, people are sick of all the middle East "wars"....my entire family agree with me about the jew issue and I talk about it to EVERYONE I meet.

Also, everyone is now walking around with a device that allows them access to the internet, practically anywhere. E-mails, audios, vids and documents or links to sites can be sent easily and instantly.

Right NOW on BBC Radio 5live, A JEW IS TALKING (Martin Lewis)

Right NOW, immediately after the other JEW, another JEW is TALKING:(Ed Milliband)

Right NOW on BBC2, A JEW IS TALKING:(Jo Coburn about JEW Jon Bercow)

On Radio 4 NOW, A JEW IS TALKING: Jane Winehouse, mother of Amy.

Also on Radio 4 is Barbara Hulanicki,whose father was KILLED BY JEWS:

Barbara Hulanicki OBE (born 1936) is a Warsaw-born fashion designer, known for being the founder of the iconic clothes store Biba.Born in Warsaw, to Polish parents. Her father was assassinated by the Stern Gang in Jerusalem in 1948 and the family moved to Brighton, England.

After that on BBC RADIO 4skin isJEW Yuval Noah Harari

The Scientific RevolutionSapiens: A Brief History of Humankind

"Adrian Scarborough continues reading from Yuval Noah Harari's ground-breaking account of humankind's remarkable history from 'insignificant apes to rulers of the world.'The discovery of ignorance and the quest for immortality."

Barbara Hulanicki OBE (born 1936) is a Warsaw-born fashion designer, known for being the founder of the iconic clothes store Biba.Born in Warsaw, to Polish parents. Her father was assassinated by the Stern Gang in Jerusalem in 1948[1] and the family moved to Brighton, England.

Sorry I know its not on topic but my blood is boiling and yours will be too.

TWO teenagers who sexually assaulted a 15-year-old schoolgirl in a Galway apartment, recording some of the incident on a mobile phone, have been jailed for 18 months each for the assault. Harvey Simukonda (19), originally from Malawi but living in Athlone, pleaded guilty to the defilement, or statutory rape, of the young girl two years ago.Jesse Edokpayi (19), from Dublin, pleaded guilty to the sexual assault of the girl on the same date. Both men were 17 at the time. - See more at: http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/schoolgirl-videoed-during-sexual-assault-30578630.html#sthash.1nHTIBb0.dpuf

Akwondi Mifune Mifune and Darmarcus Delbert Deltravious plied a 15 year olf galway girl with vodka and they filmed themselves raping her. Roughly 100% of the rapes committed in Oslo and Malmo are by enrichers.

Biographers of Sayers have disagreed as to whether Sayers was anti-Semitic. In Sayers: A Biography,JEW James Brabazon argues that Sayers was anti-Semitic. This is rebutted by Carolyn G. Heilbrun in Dorothy L. Sayers: Biography Between the Lines.

McGregor and Lewis argue in Conundrums for the Long Week-End that Sayers was not anti-Semitic but used popular British stereotypes of class and ethnicity. In 1936, a translator wanted "to soften the thrusts against the Jews" in Whose Body?; Sayers, surprised, replied that the only characters "treated in a favourable light were the Jews!"

"Clare Balding was the runaway star of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. (REALLY? WAS SHE?)

Clare Balding stole the hearts of everyone watching the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic games.

(REALLY? DID SHE?)

Now hailed a national treasure (and been given an OBE), her warm and intelligent reporting style has become her winning formula. She has won a BAFTA for TV personality of the year and we even named her on our very first Power List…but it’s not all been clear sailing. She was publicly ‘outed’ as a lesbian in 2003 by the tabloid press, recovered from thyroid cancer and struggled against people judging her sexual orientation rather than her achievements. Now comfortable with sexuality, Clare talks to Jenni Murray about being openly gay, her rather eccentric family and live reporting and the benefits of walking and presenting the Radio 4 series Ramblings which she writes about in her new book, Walking Home – My Family and Other Rambles. '

Dont worry goyim..you will learn that heterosexuality is an abomination..

10:55 "The Listening Project"Elsie and Netta - Home Is Where the Heart Is'You can take the woman out of Jamaica, but you can't take Jamaica out of the woman.Fi Glover introduces two Jamaican-born women who both settled in Cardiff after the war and now reflect on their lives here and what they miss from Jamaica.'

20:00Future ProofingCan Civility Survive?Mathematician JEW? Hannah Fry and guests look at whether civility can survive in the modern age

Hannah is such a nice name, goyim..

20:45 Four ThoughtSeries 4, Creative WomenAnna Beer asks why we do not hear more music composed by women.

BECAUSE OF EVIL HETERO WHITE MEN AND THEIR RAPING ,EVIL OPPRESSIVE PHALLUSS-OCRACY,OF COURSE! THERE CAN BE NO OTHER EXPLAINATION, GOYIM!

"She argues that many creative women still live, as they have for centuries, in the shadow of the courtesan. Using the stories of female composers from Medici-era Florence to twentieth-century Britain, she shows how excellent music composed by women has been ignored or overlooked, and explains why."

Of course we should name the jew. We should point out how we and all races have been manipulated to serve the jewish interest. To only focus on anti-white is to ignore the anit-black and anti-muslim agenda. The blacks were brought to the states BY the jew. Muslim countries are being bombed and invaded at the behest of the jew. Who's interest is a war race in? Name the Jew. Be honest. If "Nazi" is thrown at you explain the war propaganda and how it was in international finance i.e. the big jew's interest to crush Germany. It's time for the lies to END. For the lies on ALL fronts to end.

Why should the little jew fear the truth? NO one is wants the innocent to pay.

Re the Galway Rape Apes there was also another clip now gone that showed a crowd of approx. 20 angry White Irish men outside the courtroom attempting to get at the guilty. Amongst the noise what sounded like "get the black and tans". One man arrested.Perfect meme for here in Ireland, premade with historical baggage - "Get out you Black and Tans"..lets make it global.

@kevin go read what they are writing about Whites naming jews it is anti -white. Naming the cause is not counter productive. If they want to push this go ahead. But attacking those that do is anti-White. Figure it out. I though Savant to be smarter than this,guess I was wrong.

I read it enough at read all the comments they claim superiority over those naming the jew. They are in fact anti-White maybe it is you needs to re-read. You see the division they have created already? Who causes division among Whites? jews. Who wins in not naming the jew, jews win

re: BugsBy chance I was in a situation where a little debate was taking place, to their minds it was over my head!Long and short of it was that the white man was being deprived of his kibamba and was unaware and that more deprivation was to come, he treats anything official as sacrosanct/thelaw ........ the newcomer was advised not to use the race card and human rights ‘big magic mantras’ too soon as the system is loaded with deviants and English haters.... who for some reason will give priority to the newcomer first.It should be noted that the term deviant was explained as man who puts his lingum were it should not go!I thought careful .... ‘remember the Train lady’......I interjected the comment. “Why is it? every one wants to replace the English man”!This brought complete silence and then fluster.dofornow

But...you HAVE to talk 'Joos', but 'GOOD Joos' only, if you want to be elected president.

"Ted Cruz booed off stage while defending Israel

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) abruptly walked off stage at an event organized by a pro-Christian organization in Washington, D.C.,...Cruz said, "Christians have no greater ally than Israel." That's when the crowd began to boo, according to The Daily Caller...."Those who hate Israel hate America," he added, prompting more boos and heckling.As the crowd continued to shout, Cruz said, "If you will not stand with Israel and the Jews, then I will not stand with you," and then left the stage. --Jon Terbush"

White people are fighting this war on several fronts ... whether the enemies are described as jews, islamics, leftists, liberals, progressives, etc. (all lower-case to signal my disdain), they are all ANTI-White. Agitating over those various labels only depletes our energy and weakens our cause by useless infighting. The yids hold the monopoly over the slur of "anti-semitism". By adopting a similar pattern to awaken White consciousness, true compatriots should combine forces and focus on the ANTI-White meme, thus establishing White racial solidarity.

Without a solid foundation to wage war, or even to defend our ideological fortress, we are doomed from the beginning.

Euro-Whites are few (8%) while the balance of the world's seven billion people are black, brown and yellow.

PART ONEIs the main question white genocide?I assume that all sides agree that is one thing everybody knows is happening.The key word here is genocide. The average Joe, Pat, Jock, Herman etc. believe that the Nazis practiced genocide on the Jews. White genocide is a myth.What happens when your average Joe realizes the opposite is true? I leave you to draw your own conclusion.Being a gentleman of a certain age I had my own beliefs about the Holocaust and the Nazis. The Holocaust was perpetrated by Adolf Hitler. This was carried out in the most inhumane and cruel methods possible. The Nazis had no respect for human life. Did you know that they would tear apart Jewish babies? A Nazi would not think twice about bayoneting a pregnant Jewish woman through the stomach? Did you know that the Nazis herded six million Jews into gas chambers? I did. These were absolute facts. I didn't have any reason to question these atrocities. I had even read many books by people who had been in Auschwitz and other ‘death’ camps. Very moving and made me despair about how evil the Nazis were.What reason would anybody have to lie about this? I don’t know how or where but I started hearing that some people were questioning these facts. My initial reaction was of disgust. I thought it was truly horrendous to drag up what were humanities worst ever periods and question it. I do know that I didn’t make a conscious decision to investigate these claims. The only thing that I can think of is that over a period I must have read small bits that I pieced together. I then came to the decision to find out the facts. Initially I wanted to debunk those that would question something that was beyond any reasonable doubt. I knew my WWII history. All the facts fitted, the ‘revisionists’ were not only wrong they couldn’t produce anything credible.

PART TWOLong story short. I became a complete convert. I looked at the ‘established’ facts and compared the alternative views. These alternative views made much more sense. I then questioned everything. It was a hard time. I went through turmoil. I analysed the new facts and still found them hard to believe. This was completely contrary to everything I believed and didn’t want to think about the consequences of this. Logically the revisionist made more sense. I then started thinking about who had lied and why. Only one group benefitted. Only one group continue to benefit.Now I believed that the hoax was actually worse than the act it lied about. This group had perpetrated the worst lie that I could possibly imagine. They had made a nation suffer through lies. They had made a nation seem as though they were somehow sub-humans. A nation that had all of its’ honour stripped away. This nation would happily pay because they were said to be evil. Their past honour and achievements destroyed. Whoever would perpetrate such a lie were the evil ones. They were the ones that should pay. They were the ones who had no conscious about lying to achieve their aims. These are truly depraved people. Should we stop mentioning the Jews? Yes! We should be making people aware of real history and from there they will draw their own conclusions. We don’t have to do much. It’s already been done for us. All we have to do is get people to watch the videos. They don’t even have to read. Everything is there. Just a couple of clicks and away you go.

PART THREEI have a little anecdote about this. Got a friend to watch the videos listed below. The first one was a little long and perhaps to watch it in twenty to thirty minutes periods. I kept asking him if he had watched them. The answer was always ‘no’. I kept mentioning it. In fact, I harassed him a little. One evening the ‘phone rings and I answer it. No ‘hello’ or introduction. Just ‘It never f*cking happened did it!’ My mate said that he didn’t really want to watch them because he thought I was a little mad. In all fairness if you knew me you would know where he was coming from. He had decided to watch the videos just to humour me. He had put the first one on and had not watched it. He was pottering around and just listening. After about half-hour he said he was hooked. He sat down and watched it all the way through. Over the next few days he watched other vids and was convinced.My own personal view is that, yes it is the Jews. BUT it’s not all the Jews. I don’t believe that every Jew on the planet is involved in some form of conspiracy. I also believe that many non-Jews are involved. For want of a name I’m prepared to call them the NWO. Illuminati to me people talking about the same thing from different positions. A rose by any other name.So, there you have it. Don’t sell the Jewish thing. If people watch these vids with an open mind they become aware. The whole problem is accepting everything you thought was true is a lie. Very, very hard to get through. Wahrheit macht frei.Anyway, start with these:-

@nilus, yes yes yes!! It IS the jews stupid. Anyone not naming the jew is not helping at all. I have similar experiences daily. No time has ever been better than NOW to name the jew. So here comes BUGS to say, Wait!!! Dont name the jew blames whites instead! Who would think of that idea? Jews stupid

Nilus, I've been noticing that many of the goyim around me are very receptive to discussing the joo and all the damages done by this species of woe. They certainly seem to be experiencing one of their non-popular times, I guess it's time for a new blockbuster film about the $hoah. But there seems to be little sympathy for them lately with all that's happening so maybe this is a good time to name the joo.

The black savages raping white girls are only doing what comes naturally to them. It's our fault for letting them into our countries, or for letting the engineers get away with wrecking our countries by letting them in to our formerly safe countries. Send them to Israel so they can Infiltrate the place. If we all send every last one from our countries over there with promises of free gibs-me-dat, we cannot fail, and it will solve the middle east problem at the same time! Problem solved! You can thank me later...

A YOUNG boy, who lunged at a classmate with a knife, has been suspended from school and is the subject of a garda investigation.

The incident in which the boy threatened a classmate with a four-inch blade steak-knife is also being investigated by the Board of Management at St Philip's National School in Mountview in West Dublin.

It happened as the two primary school boys were leaving school to go home.

One horrified parent saw the attacker run at his intended victim and another screamed at him to stop as he pulled out the knife.

I'm not a newbie. I'm not slamming whites. I'm pointing out the existence of anti-white whites. If you can't even wrap your head around the idea of anti-white whites then you need to stop opening your mouth and doing more damage.

In fact I've been obsessing about White genocide for so long I've actually discovered that the world is full of non-Jewish anti-whites.

Maybe you are the newbie, and cannot yet resist the Zionist jews-do-it-all-and-whitey-can't-resist-the-borg idea trap. We can resist.

If Eva Hermann new mantra, she wouldn't have been speechless in front of a smug smiling Jew, walked off the interview set, and faded into oblivion. If she actually had a response of some kind to the charges that she was a Nazi then she would have been an asset rather than another pathetic Aryan meltdown case.

Are the anti-white policies of the Christian churches to be ignored? Are people claiming that "The Jews" are also pulling the strings on every major Christian denomination? Is the bigger picture being missed here?

These are real questions and they deserve real answers. The movement can not go charging off in the wrong direction and then wonder why it has missed the boat.

As always, Savant, I enjoy your website and hope to see serious discussion on this matter.

(PS: and before anyone asks, I come from a solid Roman Catholic background!)

Should we stop mentioning the Jews? Yes! We should be making people aware of real history and from there they will draw their own conclusions. We don’t have to do much. It’s already been done for us. All we have to do is get people to watch the videos. They don’t even have to read. Everything is there. Just a couple of clicks and away you go.

Thanks Lemmyhead. If they believe in ANTI-WHITES and ANTI-WHITEISM then it all falls into place.

They need to believe that White genocide exists more than they need to believe that Jewish genocide at the hands of the Nazis doesn't exist.

Let them keep their 6 million for now. So what? We have 600 million people to protect.

My own personal view is that, yes it is the Jews. BUT it’s not all the Jews. I don’t believe that every Jew on the planet is involved in some form of conspiracy.

Of course not. A worldwide conspiracy of millions is a preposterous idea. Also, it's completely unnecessary.

But imagine this scenario. All your life you've been fed the official, universally accepted history of World War Two. Evil Nazis, poor suffering Jews. Makes you ashamed to be White, but so proud of your Daddy who fought to rid the world of the scourge of Nationalism.

Then, one day, you discover that you're actually half Jewish. Suddenly, your perspective changes. They did that stuff to US! I'm a Holocaust Survivor! Everybody's against us. They're all evil. They're coming to get us again. They must be defeated.

So, what do you do? You undermine them at every opportunity. You get involved in politics, fighting for Social Justice. You make movies about evil Nazis. You become a university professor and teach about the evils of racism and antisemitism. You have joined the "global conspiracy", and you didn't even know there was one. Still don't.

Jews get the same propaganda we do, from birth. They watch the same movies, read the same newspapers, study the same degrees. But for them, it's personal. That makes it self-perpetuating.

Well said at the end. Same thing goes for reigning in the Banks: we can refrain from pointing out the obvious, but they will not refrain from attacking us all the same. If they were as foolish as we are, they wouldn't have gotten over on us as they have.

I believe this is on target for this topic. He was accused of of Those that shall not be named of anti- something. I would not care.

Sorry to say to some here but my father killed numerous Italians and Germans during WW2. He enlisted at 16 and faced Hell and survived! He ultimately served 28 years and retired a Sergeant Major. He fought in 3 wars. I will always remember my father as a Hero. That's just me. Hopefully some understand.

My opinion is the UN is a worthless POS run by the unnamed. Why does the US and Europe pay for it to exist?I know!

How's the AGENDA 21 coming along over there?

Thanks for the information Irish Savant and fellow bloggers.Scot Irish

The Metro is a free paper available all over Greater London and the South East.

Page 6, today:

Note all the jew trigger words: "cancer" "hate" "wickedness"

"Cancer of hate" is leaving jews in fear

THE 'cancer of anti-Semitism' is stalking Britain, an MP has warned. Security guards are protecting synagogues,while jews are being subjected to chants of "Hitler was right" (WHERE? WHEN?)says Tory MP Charles Walker. The member for Broxbourne told the commons yesterday:

"The CANCER of ANTI-SEMITISM is STALKING our country undre the DISGUISE of a new CLOAK. This cloak MUST be stripped away, exposing the WICKEDNESS of those that LURK behind it"

Wow..reads like something from...another time, seems very..familiar.

In December 2013 Walker was the only MP to confirm in a Telegraph survey that he would accept an 11% pay increase.

His championship of the pay rise and membership of the Speaker’s committee led to consideration as a potential speaker when JEW John Bercow stands down.

Jews should be discussed. Jewish lobby overturned our immigration laws, were behind busing and forced integration, and also led the effort to end eugenics in the West.What will destroy Whites for sure is dividing them into enemy camps. Bug says all Catholics are anti-White. Almost half the EU population is Catholic. Not to mention millions of White Americans and Canadians. According to Bug, all those White Catholics are anti-White and the enemy. The Catholic hierarchy is anti-White, but the average White Catholic is not. Most Protestant churches are active in bringing thousands of black Africans into the US. However the average Protestant is not anti-White. Most whites, regardless of religion, are terrified of being called a Racist.

Are the anti-white policies of the Christian churches to be ignored? Are people claiming that "The Jews" are also pulling the strings on every major Christian denomination? Is the bigger picture being missed here?

"Jonathan Williams recorded in his "LEGIONS OF SATAN," 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington that "a holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown."

Cornwallis went on to explain what would seem a contradiction:

"Your churches will be used to teach the Jew's religion and in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire. All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses, and they will all be under the invisible all-seeing eye of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry."

the root cause of the anti-White immigration rackets - and related phenomena like the Kosher Culture of Death attacks on White reproduction - is the Jew Power. Until the roots are torn out, the poisonous flowers will continue to bloom. Naturally, tactical circumstances will sometimes dictate a de-emphasis on the JP: always know your audience. On his course to Power, even Adolf trimmed sails and tacked many times

If we assume we are right, that the Jewish takeover of fiat currency - the Federal Reserve system being the most important - has given them virtually unlimited funds to build an unassailable tower of media and politics, then naming them may be like trying to attack their castle at it's strongest point.

But imagine this scenario. All your life you've been fed the official, universally accepted history of World War Two. Evil Nazis, poor suffering Jews. Makes you ashamed to be White, but so proud of your Daddy who fought to rid the world of the scourge of Nationalism.

In the original piece I wrote I did mention my Dad. I deleted it because the piece was far to long. I have said this before on this blog. My Dad had fought all the way through.Talking to him one day he started crying. He said it was all a lie.Does it make me love him less? No, it makes me hate the liars more.I served in the Army too. I had friends killed. My Dad had far more of his comrades killed. No wonder he cried. Those you were close to, trusted with your life and then watched die. All based on believing and trusting politicians that lied.Any modern day soldiers feel the same?Not many we want to awaken will have Fathers who fought in WWII. Many will have Grandfathers. Some will have no living relations. The point I try to make is that this is the biggest lie ever told. It's taught as the truth. If we can get people to see this lie how much easier it is to get them to see other lies.

Then, one day, you discover that you're actually half Jewish. Suddenly, your perspective changes. They did that stuff to US! I'm a Holocaust Survivor! Everybody's against us. They're all evil. They're coming to get us again. They must be defeated.Does that happen often?'Errr Mom I hate to bring this up but......errr... I don't know how to put this......err... are you or Dad Jewish? Mom I'm nearly thirty years old I need to know! Mom, while we are being honest. Why have I never left this attic?

"Here's an excerpt from that post. "Even if we accept that Jews are the masterminds behind our immigration woes it's counterproductive to emphasise it.....for the reason that it results in instantaneous banishment from 'respectable' society. And as a consequence the more immediate objective of stopping mass black and Muslim immigration gets lost in the storm.""---------------------

Pandering to the tender feelings of 'respectable' society will not help us get out of this disastrous situation. 'Respectable' society is 'kosher' society that has done nothing, has said nothing and will do absolutely nothing about the jew monsters and White traitors that are destroying us. Those that do will be 'removing' themselves from respectable society, just like you, Savant, have done to some degree, I imagine.

'Respectful' society members want to remain so, and do so by going along with the jew run status quo system whether they are aware of it or not.

'Respectful' society will side with, "mass black and Muslim immigration" because that is what the jew run media tells them to support.

To solve our problems we need to deal with the source, the root cause, namely organised jewry. They are the ones that have deliberately opened the gates, to deliberately destroy us. As I wrote in a comment to the blog post you referred to, "Know the enemy, name the enemy and destroy the enemy before the enemy finally destroys us."

Now, when we get down to communicating our message to a particular audience, then of course, commonsense tells us that "naming the jew", in your face, may be counter-productive. So use your commonsense and tailor your message accordingly. Yet, sometimes old, "Shock and Awe" is very effective.

But for those not willing, for whatever reason, to, "Name the jew", then they can also do good by at least hinting at it.

Bottom line is this: We will not win without naming the jew, without exposing its, "spider in the web" role. Who exactly will point the finger at the criminal cabal that has engineered countless wars behind the scenes, and who is responsible for our ongoing racial destruction?

South Africa:Pisstorious Show TrialThe reporting of this murder by a white man is way out of all proportion!Total world coverage. In the same period and time scale :Does any one have the details of the number of murders of the most savage kind against innocent white folk in the RSA?Do those in the MSM not think that this will increase the hatred of white folk?The virtual non stop degrading (of white folk) which goes on is going to cause serious trouble......look at the way followers of an iron age cult assumed they had a license to rape ! given a free hand by a nod and a wink?Nowt in writing: Those in authority did not know.dofornow

Here's my thoughts on the matter: Both sides have merit, but why can't we just continue doing both? Name the jew and name the shabbos goy traitors.

If people decide to be 'turned off' by this message, then let them join the groups who refuse to name the jew, but still have largely the same agenda as us.

I still believe it's a good thing that for instance the FN has been growing so steadily in France, although my personal beliefs are much closer to the likes of Golden Dawn or Yobbik.

I will always name the jew myself, because I believe you're letting the worst enemies of the White people off the hook when you do not. However, I do understand that naming the jew may not be the absolute priority in our current situation. First we need to block the leak before we mop the excess water off the kitchen floor right.

By the way, with the newly moderated comments...why is that little shitbag weasel returning and allowed to resume his derailing off the blog? We all know exactly which comments are his, do we not?

Having lived through Rhodesia and South Africa, always hearing the enemy are the communists and being told the Oppenheimers and the Ruperts good honest God fearing Afrikaans boys, the worst possible strategy is to not name the Jew.

Not naming them allows them to slither in the shadows.

Sometimes subtlety is required but not naming the Jew is a dead end strategy. Even Goebbels said that much.

t's time to stop blaming a certain tribe & placing fault where it truly lies, ourselves.

WE destroyed our brothers in the 40's with great zeal, the only people who tried to stop the madness... WE embraced insane leftism in the '60's, the results can be seen... WE elect & reelect the same worthless/incompetent political candidates... WE sit mindlessly in front of the idiot box every Sunday, obsessed with a game played by 80ig thugs that would RAPE YOUR DAUGHTERS OR WIVES given the chance, yet we cheer them on as "heroes"... WE sit quietly while the 3rd world POURS across our borders, which WILL destroy our country.

None of this would have happened had we not allowed it to happen, had we behaved like men..

I'M guilty.. YOU'RE guilty.. All of us are. We can only try to preserve what is left so that there will be hope for our descendants. That they will note face a nightmarish world..

Is it better in strategy to eschew the Jew and suffer the slings and arrows that appear to be Outrageous Fortune? Or

Should we confront the Nazi Smear and the Eternal Victim Schtick straight up and Name the Game and the Masters of the Game.

I say the latter. Dare to Bare and View the Jew.

Use neuroplasticity itself to Finagle the Bagel.

That said - you have to interrupt the regularly scheduled programming of the Whites. You don't want to push the alarm, the guilt or delete codes installed through the virus itself or ping its firewall.

You can't get directly through the Jew Mind Warp of the virus in the mass mind or in polite conversation at any social venue.

So go for open questions that create cognnitive dissonance - preferably with a humorous edge.

Learn conversational Jew-do and how to flip the memes of the regularly scheduled programming - especially where it is prima facie unjust to Whites - like the prohibition of freedom of association and right to organise in its own interest for an identifiable demographic.

Learn Yiddish terms (considered very cool) that the Jew uses to name itsself and its collective actions.

It could happen. It requires two Jewish (or four half-Jewish) grandparents, not necessarily one Jewish parent. But that scenario would work just as well with just one Jewish grandparent - i.e. quarter Jewish.

Anonymous said...

@lemmyhead 11:04

"the scourge of Nationalism."

You mean, German nationalism.

German nationalism isn't such a great thing for everyone else, is it.

Lemmyhead was quoting my comment. I used that phrase deliberately.

In Cape Town my barber, now retired, was a German born in the Third Reich (just barely). He believed that Hitler was an agent of the Illuminati, that he never intended to win the war, and that his purpose in the plan was to make Nationalism so poisonous that it would never again be a respectable force in politics.

Whether he was right or wrong, that's the way it has worked out, isn't it?

I think most of us here understand that Nationalism is the antithesis of multiculturalism, and support it in Ireland, England, Greece and even Germany. I do, at least.

Piet said...

dofornow it pisses me off when I see a porch monkey judging a Boer.

Couldn't agree more. For the information of the insufficiently enriched here (those who have not actually lived among them), the judge's name is Masipa. In her language, that means what we would politely call excrement. Of course, her language never having been historically a written language, the concept of euphemisms is unknown to them. Yeah, her name is Shit. 's true.

Katana says: "Now, when we get down to communicating our message to a particular audience, then of course, commonsense tells us that "naming the jew", in your face, may be counter-productive. So use your commonsense and tailor your message accordingly. "

Well exactly. Well said. This "directive" from BUGS assumes we are all idiots with Nazi memorabilia and Swastikas carved into our foreheads.

Most people I meet will see me as a charmimh, friendly, helpful person, Im not going to scream "Heil Hitler! KILL ALL THE JEWS!" everytime I get on a bus or go into a shop.

I mentioned fishing the other night at Brighton Marina, no not "fisting", that's hald a mile to the West, at Duke's Mound, where the solution to daytime cottaging is to "let the bushes grow taller" (see my post above)

Do you think the first thing I said to the guy fishing next to me was "Im a raycist and I hate JEWS and Heil Hitler?"

However, within the space of 2 hours, he was saying "Hitler was right".

We are not stupid and if we cant talk about jews at venues like this, then, fuck it, Im off, and Akira was RIGHT.

AGAIN.

So, all future comments to be:

"Boy, those muzzies piss me off. And those blacks,well not all of them, just the stabby rapey killy corrupt swindly fraudy ones.

Travellers could cause postponement of one of Sussex’s biggest rugby fixtures

Travellers could be responsible for the postponement of one of Sussex’s biggest rugby fixtures as a club fears for the safety of hundreds of players.

A group of seven caravans have taken over the car park at Brighton Blues Rugby Football Club’s Waterhall Ground ahead of their derby clash with Hove.

With 220 footballers as well as 120 rugby players due to play on Saturday, the club is considering cancelling all fixtures because an ambulance would not be able to access the pitches.

Brighton’s commercial manager Jason Tams said: “If I cannot guarantee the safety of my players and our opposition, I will have no option but to cancel the game.

“The council and the police have been inundated with calls from the club this morning, but nobody seems to want to make a decision.

“This is our biggest fixture of the year – more than 800 people came down last year – and the financial implication of cancelling the fixture would be enormous. We’d lose thousands.

“But we also have 500 juniors due to come down on Sunday for pre-season registration day and the junior football season starts on the bottom pitches.”

Downs Park School have booked the artificial pitch this afternoon, but Mr Tams will advise them to cancel because of abuse the special needs students have received in the past by travellers including having rocks thrown at them.

"He believed that Hitler was an agent of the Illuminati, that he never intended to win the war, and that his purpose in the plan was to make Nationalism so poisonous that it would never again be a respectable force in politics."

THE TRUE ONE who has ALL the answers,(in fact usually mere bloodless ,nose-thumbing rebuttals)

AKA the SPECIAL DIVINE BEING who has been gifted (by the Random Non-Existent God Of Chance) the foresight, wisdom ,intellectual prowess,immeasurable intuition, analytical rigour and epistemological prowess to slay ALL "stoopid anti-semites" wrote:

"@Croesus 21:40

"What Hitler and Germany achieved economically in the thirties was indeed a miracle."

Quite the contrary.

Within a few months of gaining power, Hitler put in place a number of actions which would ready his country for war. In other words, he put his country's economy on a war footing, accelerating as time went on.There are immediate benefits to this in terms of employment and modernisation.The downside though, and it's a pretty big one, is that once the roads are built, the factories completed and the army supplied and manned, the process cannot continue without war because otherwise you are left with construction workers without anything left to build, factory workers without anything needing to be made and soldiers having to be paid to do nothing.In other words, as soon as the economy was dependent on being placed on a war footing, war was inevitable. The alternative was millions of unhappy, laid-off workers and unpaid soldiers.

So you can marvel at this economic transformation all you like, but the actual result of this economic success was a gamble with the country's destruction. A pretty big gamble to make, no? Would you take that kind of gamble with your family's safety and well-being for a little short term financial benefit? No, you wouldn't. Hitler took this gamble with the safety and well-being of the German people and it didn't pay off.

"What Hitler and Germany achieved economically in the thirties was indeed a miracle."

_____________

My name is Mary.

I'm quite contrary.

I'm thinking of getting a canary, cos I've already had plenty of experience with a Cockatoo, and, as Sir David Attenborough,spent after a gruelling but necessary shoot naked exclaimed, "My Goodness! That's Canary!"

(I was flattered,natch, but the Posh Old Gorilla-Stroker had a point:

It WAS fuckin hairy.)

ANYWAY:

"Within a few months of gaining power, Hitler put in place a number of actions which would ready his country for war. In other words, he put his country's economy on a war footing, accelerating as time went on.There are immediate benefits to this in terms of employment and modernisation.The downside though, and it's a pretty big one, is that once the roads are built, the factories completed and the army supplied and manned, the process cannot continue without war because otherwise you are left with construction workers without anything left to build, factory workers without anything needing to be made and soldiers having to be paid to do nothing.In other words, as soon as the economy was dependent on being placed on a war footing, war was inevitable. The alternative was millions of unhappy, laid-off workers and unpaid soldiers.

So you can marvel at this economic transformation all you like, but the actual result of this economic success was a gamble with the country's destruction. A pretty big gamble to make, no? Would you take that kind of gamble with your family's safety and well-being for a little short term financial benefit? No, you wouldn't. Hitler took this gamble with the safety and well-being of the German people and it didn't pay off.

"In Cape Town my barber, now retired, was a German born in the Third Reich (just barely). He believed that Hitler was an agent of the Illuminati, that he never intended to win the war, and that his purpose in the plan was to make Nationalism so poisonous that it would never again be a respectable force in politics."

.When this thread was first posted, I thought:- Hmmm. pretty sneaky, Savant. if any theme attracts the hasbarats, it'll be this one. Rather like Mao's "Let a thousand flowers bloom" campaign, but this time on the side of right.

I was not wrong.

... If only an intellectual case could be made for preventing what is happening to us without it having to resort to becoming an obsession with Jews.

Some people have been on this blog before who have not towed the party line of "everything is the Jews' fault" and they have been dismissed as "paid hasbaras". But if you think about it, if anyone is being paid, it is far more likely to be the ones who are doing the real damage to the fight against mass immigration, and that is the Jew-obsessed idiots who make it so easy for the anti-immigration movement as a whole to be attacked.

10 September 2014 21:55

I've told you several times Enyoo. It's called "style". If you have not grasped the concept yet ... you never will.

Couldn't agree more. For the information of the insufficiently enriched here (those who have not actually lived among them), the judge's name is Masipa.

Speaking of porch monkeys, I found myself in the wonderful position of giving a Green Party Member one right up the poop chute.

As almost no-one will know, (this is New Zealand after all) we have national elections in a week. I was introduced to a woman who turned out to be fairly high up (as mentioned before) in the Green Party as well as a liberal (sorry) sprinkling of Labour supporters.After a bit of to-and-fro, she decided to make a bit of political capital out of me --

I could actually see the idea strike her; Ex-ZA; White Old Guy; and, therefore, obviously a racist. This could be useful to her.

She and her buds watched it all on her huge, new, smartphone ... while I watched them. It was like a Hollywood production as their expressions froze, then curdled ... and then a chorus of appalled "Oh"'s at the really nasty bits, ending with a chorus of "Oh ... GOD."

Some of them were quite grey at the end, as I leaned over and said: "That was a few weeks ago ... I prefer your style of election."

"What Hitler and Germany achieved economically in the thirties was indeed a miracle."

"Quite the contrary."

Quite the CONT.

Within a few months of gaining power, ZOG USA put in place a number of actions which would ready the country for war. In other words, ZOG put USA's economy on a war footing, accelerating as time went on.There were immediate benefits to this in terms of employment and modernisation.The downside though, and it's a pretty big one, is that once the roads are decrepit, the factories shipped overseas and the army over-supplied and over-manned, the process cannot continue without war because otherwise you are left with construction workers without anything left to build, factory workers without jobs and White people paying for NIGGERS.

In other words, as soon as the US economy was dependent on being placed on a war footing, PERPETUAL war was inevitable. The KIKE BONUS was millions of unhappy, laid-off workers and unpaid soldiers.

So you can marvel at this economic transformation all you like, but the actual result of this economic success was a gamble with the country's destruction. A pretty big gamble to make, no? Would you take that kind of gamble with your family's safety and well-being for a little short term financial benefit? Naziest Uncle wouldn't.

Zog took this gamble with the safety and well-being of the American Goyim and it didn't half pay off.

Things are not always as they seem, even if you wish them to be,especially if contrarian internet characters try to tell youi that evrything you say is the opposite of true.

The little nose behind the curtain said (21:55): “But if you think about it, if anyone is being PAID, it...is the JEW-OBSESSED IDIOTS who make it so easy for the anti-immigration movement as a whole to be attacked.”

In answer to my question “who are these “Jew-obsessed idiots” who are being paid, and who’s paying them?”, the little nose behind the curtain replied (11:59): “It's the *ahem* "truthseekers" who believe that there are PAID posters [“JEW-OBSESSED IDIOTS”] here because everything's a CIA/ Mossad conspiracy isn't it.”

LOL!!!

So, according to the little nose behind the curtain, the *ahem* "truthseekers" (who believe “everything’s a Mossad conspiracy”) think “Jew-obsessed idiots” are being paid.

You couldn’t make it up.

LOL!!!

The little nose behind the curtain,

You state, quote: “But IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT, if anyone is being paid, it...is the Jew-obsessed idiots who make it so easy for the anti-immigration movement as a whole to be attacked.”

Saying “IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT”, shows that YOU believe “Jew-obsessed idiots” are being paid, so I’ll ask you once again: Who are these “Jew-obsessed idiots” who are being paid, and who’s paying them?”

Stop, take a deep breath, and think carefully before you answer the question.

Nilus, Croesus is correct. The National Socialist were NOT preparing for war. Please see GERMANY'S ECONOMIC pREPARATIONS FOR WAR by Burton H. Klien.

"By James E. Egolf "James E. Egolf, MA"Verified Purchase(What's this?) This review is from: Germany's economic preparations for war (Hardcover) Burton Klein's GERMANY'S ECONOMIC PREPARTAIONS FOR WAR is a dispassionate refutation of the myth that the Hitler regime prepared for total war. Klein uses both the sources from German archives and the Rand Corporation to undermine the popularly held belief that the Germans planned to conquer the world or Europe.

Klein makes clear that German investment before and during the National Socialist Regime was very low, and this obviously meant that investment in heavy investment to make war materials was limited. One of the reasons for this phenomena was the fact that government expendatures for military goods required higher taxes which Hitler and his advisers wanted to avoid. This not to say that there were no preparations for war. However, these preparations were intended for a possible limited war rather than the one that ensued during World War II.

What may surprise readers is that the Nationalist Socialist government under Hitler did intend to "settle the score" in Eastern Europe. Readers should remember that the Germans did win World War I on the Eastern front against the Russians and extracted a peace treaty from the Bolsheviks in 1918 (The Treaty of Brest Litovsk). The disintegration of the Hapsburh Empire beginning in 1916 and the numerous nationalities that claimed "states" left a power vaccum in Eastern Europe which more astute men realized could result in a future war between the Germans and the Soviets.

An interesting aspect of this book is the treatment of taxes, deficit spending, and international trade arrangements which helped restore the German economy. One must remember that the Germans had hyperinflation as early as 1923 and then faced The Great Depression. In fact, the Germans were almost reduced to using barter trade in some of their international trade espeically in Eastern Europe. The use of tax policy and fiscal policy helped restore the German economic status.

There are interesting comments between Hitler and his one economic adviser Schacht over Hitler's insistence that resources should go into consumer goods. The dispute was allocating metal for women's hair curlers, and a regime that considered "Guns before butter" would hardly indicate that Hitler wanted a full war time economy.

Another surprising aspect of this book is that Hitler and his advisers ordered a reduction of military spending and war production after the initial spectacular success when the Germans invaded the Soviet on June 22, 1941. This may well indicate that the German policy makers did not only plan a total war but never dreamed of one until it was forced upon them in 1944.

To compare Germany's military preparations with some of the Western European, one should read the data that Klein provides. The fact is that the French and British spent much more than the Germans for war materials. One should also note that the Soviets had something of a military geared economy especially in the late 1920s and early 1930s when Stalin ordered the confiscation of the Kulaks' land and wealth which had to confiscated by military force.

To give the reader a better conception of German military spending, attention should be given to chapter VIII which is titled "A Peacelike War Economy." Even after the German catastrophic loss at Stalingrad in 1943, Hitler's increase in military spending was moderate. The Germans did not take the concept of total war until the war was brought home to German. The "allies" extensively bombed German industrial facilities only to discover that military production was increasing. This was due to the low level of production prior to 1944.

continued:Klein's book deserves more attention than it has recieved. GERMAN'S ECONOMIC PREPARTIONS FOR WAR is instructive in revealing that origins of World War II and the course of this war in Europe is much more complex than is popularly allowed in textbooks and political bafflegab."

Almost everything we've been told in the mainstream about Hitler and National Socialism is a LIE.

Katana says: "Now, when we get down to communicating our message to a particular audience, then of course, commonsense tells us that "naming the jew", in your face, may be counter-productive. So use your commonsense and tailor your message accordingly. "

Well exactly. Well said. This "directive" from BUGS assumes we are all idiots with Nazi memorabilia and Swastikas carved into our foreheads.

Most people I meet will see me as a charming, friendly, helpful person, Im not going to scream "Heil Hitler! KILL ALL THE JEWS!" everytime I get on a bus or go into a shop.----------

LOL! Thanks nilus.

Perhaps what prompted Sav's post was the behind the scenes guiding hand of Lady Savant? Helping to reel in her one and only from the rocky, treacherous shores of Cape Disrespectable, she mentioned a site called Bugs that has a 12 Step Program for the "Not to be Named" obsessed.

It all started on being somewhat disturbed with Sav's growing interest, nee obsession, about the benefits of helping the cause by sporting a discreet tattoo. Sav's subscriptions to Tattoo Today, Tattoo Weekly and the hard core Tattoo Monthly (all from the highly respected Jewberg Press) was gradually causing a worrying frown to appear on her unblemished brow. It didn't begin that way, as speaking naughtily, Lady Savant was a little titillated by it all. Imagine a little secret between the two of them, only to be hinted at, at dinner parties in gossip after a few or two.

But then as the wheels of her womanish mind whirled and whirled it dawned on her that Savant's desire to help the cause by sporting a tattoo went beyond merely indulging her, for she has been 'on board' since their marriage, after all.

What Savant had in mind and called "discreet", yet visible from from five yards, was in fact a tattoo of the most recognizable symbol in all living memory on his charming brow! Unsurprisingly, Lady Savant in quite an unladylike manner, and frankly in a an uncharacteristic manner to boot, blurted out that this was as, "discreet as dog's balls!", in one of the rarest of disagreements between them.

Needless to say, this brave demonstration for the cause is on hold, like the subscriptions, and the doghouse has a "No Vacancies" sign for the time being.

Uncle Nasty, well done. I can just imagine the faces of all those lady social justice warriors. Reality is a bit overwhelming for that type.

I must say, I was a bit sceptical about that video when I first saw it. It's obviously a professional production, not your regular phone job (steady camera, no faces). The ANC T-shirts are prominent in the first part, but there is no continuity linking that crowd to the later scenes. The blows with the axe seem to me to miss the victim's head completely. Earlier reports stated that she had been killed, which would seem likely if the video was real.

The additional information in this report, that it was made by an Argus reporter, makes sense. Did he instigate it? Did he stage it? Is it one of those incidents like Dan Rather's "fake, but true" revelation of GW Bush's military record? I reserve judgment.

Helvena is of course 100% correct and it is good that she cites a jew economist to support the fairly obvious contention that Hitler wanted nothing to do with war and did whatever he could to prevent it. Here's another economist with more details: Alan S. Milward, “War, Economy and Society 1939-1945”.

On the otherhand there is ample evidence, much of it out off their own mouths, that the jews wanted and engineered the war. Wars do not produce wealth, they destroy it, except for the empty “stimulus” of inflation. Hitler's economy produced wealth with no inflation. Please, gentlemen study a little before spouting off. Most of you seem innocent even of AJP Taylor and FJP Veale.

As for the jew desire that we stop “obsessing” about them; how is it any concern of yours, dear jews, what we think or talk about? We are not obsessed with jews, we are obsessed with the ruin of our lives, our children, our nations, our universities, we are obsessed with the invention of thought crimes, with the introduction of thought control in the media, we are obsessed with the oppression of typical false-flag and terrorism. And behind all of these, smirks the jew.

I for one will not blame the innocent who try to believe what they have been taught; the culprit is in every case the jew. But the jew will not stop himself, and we who know and understand are very much to blame unless we name the jew and counter him wherever we can. Unless and until the jew is stopped there will be tens and hundreds of thousands of rapes, murders, and persecutions, and we shall be remembered, if at all, only as the generation too cowardly to protect itself.

Can we at least agree that there is a huge difference between investigating an issue, and trying to persuade someone of what we believe to be the case? Mark well that we cannot investigate the true extent of jew destructiveness unless we name him, focus on him and collect the evidence. Afterwards we can look for the best means of getting the message out.

Katana says: "Now, when we get down to communicating our message to a particular audience, then of course, commonsense tells us that "naming the jew", in your face, may be counter-productive. So use your commonsense and tailor your message accordingly. "

Well exactly. Well said. This "directive" from BUGS assumes we are all idiots with Nazi memorabilia and Swastikas carved into our foreheads.

Most people I meet will see me as a charming, friendly, helpful person, Im not going to scream "Heil Hitler! KILL ALL THE JEWS!" everytime I get on a bus or go into a shop.----------

LOL! Thanks nilus.

Quite. .... and very succintly put. Far more so than I ever could.

My comments on this blog are sometimes (sometimes?) a bit extreme. Why?

Because when dealing with a certain number of like-minded people one feels that a bit of occasional extremity can be taken with a pinch of salt -- or as a pinch of salt, to improve the flavour of one's posts, so to speak.

The fault of the eternal hasbarats is that they assume that we are like them. Shrieking harridans of both genders, whose tactic is to grab one by the lapels and screech their message into one's face -- halitosis and all.

Actually, no.

We too have learned to assess the situation, the possible level of enmity -- and preparation -- that may be encountered, to be prepared, oneself ... and to be low key in all responses.

To be well read is also a huge advantage ... because most of them aren't. All they know -- is what the Party deems important to tell them.

Don't forget that famous quote:-

Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas? Josef Stalin.

As quoted in Quotations for Public Speakers : A Historical, Literary, and Political Anthology (2001) by Robert G. Torricelli, p. 121

Patrick Grimm's blog (no longer active) was one of the best in the earlier years to shine a spotlight on the jews. Although his last post was almost five years ago, it's still an excellent source for research material.

Israel gets $3 billion a year in military aid from the US. Over the last 60 years, the Jewish state has received about $250 billion worth of airplanes and armaments.

Yet when Obama appeals for a "a broad international coalition" to fight ISIS, which supposedly threatens the whole Middle East, Israel is not asked to join. Canada, Germany, Australia, France, Turkey ..all are asked..but not Israel.

Israel is the strongest military power in the region. But apparently it bears no responsibility to help contain this "threat."

http://henrymakow.com/2014/09/Israel-Missing-from-ISIS-Fight%20.html

Funny. They usually call someone "the next Hitler" at the slightest sign of trouble and demand pre-emptive action. ISIS is rampaging all over the place and they don't do anything, preferring to blow up some Palestinians instead.

There appear to be some here who are opposed to 'attacking the jew'. No nationalist advocates attacking the jew: we merely wish to point out the fact-based truth about what they do and have been doing for centuries. As far as the jew is concerned, revealing his activities is 'anti-semitic', the so be it.

The 'jew' is the biological jew, driven by the imperative of destroying his host. It occurs in nature quire often where an organism (parasites, bacterium, virus) will destroy its host. Note particularly two key tenets:1) the biological jew is no more engaged in a conspiracy to destroy his host than parasites, bacteria or viruses - he's only doing what his DNA has programmed him to do, so he must be quarantined and deported so that the host (that's us white people) is not destroyed.2) many 'jews' do not have the DNA for destroying the host even though they are raised as jews. That explains the anomalies - David Cole, Roger Dommergue, Aaron Russo, Paul Eisen et al. Unfortunately, these are so few that they cannot organise a 'jews for whites' group to counter the destruction wrought by their fellow jews, the biological jews.

Europe was worried about its falling birthrates in the 1970s and proposals were made to subsidize people who had children. One of the big arguments against this was, of course, that, “Hitler did that.”

But nobody questioned the fact that Europeans were concerned about Europeans dying out.

.Speaking of huge mobile phones and Smartphones, I must admit that, as a bit of a Luddite, I resisted the Smart Phone, for as long as possible. Pretty much the same way I resisted the original Cell phones of the nineties.

Well, that all ended a few months back when a good friend upgraded his Samsung S2 to the latest S5 and kindly donated the old one to me.

When I say kindly donated, the truth is he snarled at me, saying "Take this fucking thing. I'm sick to death of trying to send you articles, web pages and images only to have them die a hundred fucking deaths on your clunky fucking Nokia ..."

Hey, that thing served me faithfully for eight years. That's not what I call old.

The point being, I guess that I did not want to invest a big chunk of loot ($600-880) in a device that is smarter than I am, and will probably be as dead as Disco in 12 months or less.

Secondly (and this is closer to the truth) I was intimidated by the seemingly Godlike capabilities of the damn things and would once more plummet back to 1988 when I had to bribe my neighbor's kid to set up my VCR and TV.

Well, good news for the Luddites. A bootlegged copy of "Samsung Galaxy for Dummies" (read through twice, just to make sure) and the internet for the more exotic queries ... and I am now an Android fundi.

The point? Everyone, and I mean Everyone I meet these day has one of these things -- and they spend their empty little lives on them.

They are not cheap! Where the fuck do they get the money, A: To buy them ... and B: to pay for the airtime? Even our local niggers (the Pacific Islanders ... the Benefit Queens) all have them.

When one considers that 95% of them are made in China or have components that are made in China (Yes, I include Apple), when (not if) the economy implodes and the west goes down the pipes, so will China and the US in a downhill race (plummet?) to the bottom ...

Tell you what, I'll start: the guy was one of the very few Westminster politicians I had any respect for, 'cos when he walked into a room, or spoke, you knew here was a real man, someone of actual substance, and not the plastic twats that usually pass for politicians.

Ti's my opinion of the REV IAN PAISLEY!!! (RIP) but, this being an Irish site, any thoughts?

It wasn’t that long ago that the little nose behind the curtain was telling us that we should all be supporting poor little Israel, because, according to him, only Israel can save us poor goyim in the West from the Muslim hordes.

Now he’s telling us that, in order to gain power, we must stop naming the Jew. Once we gain power, we can then go after the Jews all we want (“you can go after them all you want”).

One minute he’s talking about supporting poor little Israel, the next minute he’s talking about going “all Nazi” (LOL!!!) on the Jews.

I'm posting the slightly redacted text of the email here in case any more Bravehearts venture off the reservation:

Quote:Jimmy,

I am reading with interest the mantra thread. I've also been perusing Whitaker's site, which I haven't followed in quite a few years. It just goes to show that political strategies must be very carefully thought out before implementation.

Whitaker means well and knows plenty, but he's impotent. He simply doesn't have it in him to man up: he's an alcoholic, for one thing. He used to talk about it all the time. IIRC, he's childless. I think he can't psychologically stand the idea of 'leading' an acolyte into harm's way. And Whitaker had a bad experience as chief of staff for an Ohio congressman that he swears was murdered (and I take him at his word). So he's content to nibble around the edges, like pilot fish around a shark. That way, he hopes, these BUGSters won't get slaughtered, while doing some trifling amount of good (which is more than most).

It doesn't work that way in politics, as Whitaker damned well knows. Pilot fish don't morph into sharks or whales. Promoting a half-message simply gives jews more room to tighten the noose around the partially castrated 'defense' that is the mantra. Jews continually redefine more broadly what it means to be a 'naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.' It's nuts to think SPLC/ADL et al, aren't using Bugster boogeymen right now in their scarejew solicitations. If they aren't, they will be.

Basically, the mantra was a gateway drug to WN. Whitaker was associating with the Duke/Black bunch at the time. Whitaker eschewed jews in the formulation to keep the Pavlovian response from kicking-in among the audience. This seems reasonable for about two seconds, until you realize you're deferring to your enemy, to the point of exculpating them.

Somewhere along the line, the tactic became the strategy, an end unto itself. Undoubtedly, many of the current promoters are actually kikes, who have yet again infiltrated and redirected a conservative project, precisely because it didn't take a strong, clear anti-jew position at the outset. How would anyone know for sure? They're mainly anonymous internet people. I mean, my god, how many times do these fools like Whitaker make the same fucking mistake?

Alex is right in that you can't be cute about this stuff. Here we have a case study of a project that is not merely conservative, it's explicitly white. That's not enough. It has to be pro-White and anti-jew to succeed. One position is undefended. The other is unfocused. Progress can only be made with both positions operating simultaneously.

I think Whitaker is genuine--genuinely wrong, at least in part. But he's not intentionally working for the other side, ala Taylor. And he isn't out to fill his own pockets, ala Buchanan. He's trying to make headway in the safest fashion he can imagine. That's not good enough.

I see he recently posted about how successful blogs stir up emotions in their readers, but that's exactly what BUGS doesn't do. And that's somehow a good thing with a DEEP FUNDAMENTAL LESSON, somewhere, even though the emotional, jewish stuff they eschew goes straight to the heart of the matter--indeed, can't be excised, try as they might.

As you are trying to win the argument in public on immigration, any talk on the Jews will distract and weaken this.

So, don’t mention the Jews much when arguing immigration. When the Jews and the Jewish question arise while arguing against our annihilation through immigration, WITHSTAND. When dealing with the Jews separately, later, ATTACK.

For example. If there is a political party which aims itself against immigration and understands the role of the Jew, they should designate one member only to be allowed to mention Jews. In this way, the public hear the arguments on immigration from many speakers while an honest, direct manner can still be maintained. Any necessary mention of the Jews can thus be referred to the one designated Jew mentioner. At first, this one speaker could be defensive and parry the Jewish Question while covering the basics. In private speaking with the activists all subjects would be open. If the public got to hear of such things, the one designated would parry such in public. At a later stage, as the party came to be more accepted on the public scene, the speaker’s rhetoric could change to a more offensive stance. As the enemies of truth tried to ‘expose’ the nascent party, the response could be honest, but careful. ‘Sure. There‘s more to this. We’ll explain it more later.’

Democracy is naturally moving our way, as our concerns become more and more mainstream. So this should all get easier and easier.

Rogue, dear chap, down all the years the Rev. Big Ian was widely, if covertly, admired by people in the alleged Republic of Ireland, simply because whether you agreed or not he said what he thought, spoke his mind, did not dissimulate. What you saw was what you got. He was a stark contrast indeed to the politicos of Dublin, craven, abject, two-faced, perennially talking out of both sides of their mouths, people beside whom the lowest casino-scum looked like magnificent paragons of virtue.

... For example. If there is a political party which aims itself against immigration and understands the role of the Jew, they should designate one member only to be allowed to mention Jews. In this way, the public hear the arguments on immigration from many speakers while an honest, direct manner can still be maintained. Any necessary mention of the Jews can thus be referred to the one designated Jew mentioner. At first, this one speaker could be defensive and parry the Jewish Question while covering the basics. In private speaking with the activists all subjects would be open.

Absolutely outstanding, Nero. A man after my own heart , you have created the prototype of "Good NAZI/Bad NAZI" scenario.

What could only be defined as a "hasbagoy" as for the first time in History we infiltrate, subvert and batten on them, using all their tired old arguments on them!!

Seriously though, it is brilliant. We have a spokesvillain that rips the collective arsehole out of the Chosen, and is then supported by the faint (oh, so faint) criticism of another, subtler guy who repeats -- and confirms -- the same message in slightly more conciliatory tones.

The original villain is then publicly and loudly castigated for his "insensitivity" by the more "moderate" members of the movement ... who publicly repeat his accusations and then he is stored, so to speak ... until we need him again.

The 'kick racism out of football' seems to have come to an end. It's been replaced by the 'kick homophobia out of football'.What have these people got about people owning homes?Ian Paisley? Should I write about my thoughts on him? Never......Never......Never.

During WW2 the British establishment ruling the UK rounded up and interned or deported every single innocent German in the land - AFAIK.

It seems the only way do deal with this Islamic scourge in UK/Europe .. and America, is to round up ALL Islamics and do the same with them, along with the do-gooders and other shit who support and facilitate them.

I think by "go after them all you want", he knows that you'll do nothing but whine about them.

You're quite welcome to whine about Jews all you want AFTER we've turned the tables on the ruination of White lands because then it won't matter. It's the whining and obsessing about them BEFORE we've been able to turn the tables, which harms White people.

As for the importance of the existence of Israel, if Israel wasn't there then there would be an unbroken chain of Muslim lands from West Africa to the Middle East to Europe to Central Asia to South East Asia. This would not be good for the well-being of non-Muslims everywhere. With the distraction of Israel gone, Spain and Eastern Europe then Italy would be within their (the mujahidin's) sights.

"Yet when Obama appeals for a "a broad international coalition" to fight ISIS, which supposedly threatens the whole Middle East, Israel is not asked to join. Canada, Germany, Australia, France, Turkey ..all are asked..but not Israel.

Israel is the strongest military power in the region. But apparently it bears no responsibility to help contain this "threat.""

Go and have a think for five minutes about why it would be unwise for Israel to join in the fight, then come back and compare it with the reason below. If your conclusion matches this then you have got it right.

********************

If Israel fights ISIS directly then it will increase support for ISIS from the surrounding Arab countries and from Muslims everywhere, and Israel's allies will be denied even more bases/ overflights/ help from countries in the region. In other words, having Israel on your side when fighting against Muslims is as toxic as having people who sound like national socialists on your side when fighting against the destruction of White lands.

Remember when Saddam Hussein tried to drawn Israel into the first Gulf War? Ever wondered why he tried to draw them in?

“I pray dearly that in the ungodly event that Tehran or its jihadi proxies (Hez'ballah, Hamas etc) target Israel with a nuke, that she retaliate with everything she has at Tehran, Mecca, and Medina...Not to mention EUROPE. They exterminated all their Jews, but that wasn't enough. Those MONSTERS then went on to import the next generation of Jew killers.” – Jew Pamela Gellar http://pamelageller.com/2010/02/this-new-hatred-comes-from-muslim-immigrants-the-jewish-people-are-afraid-now.html/

White people need to believe that they have figured things out for themselves so lecturing someone on those behind our dispassion wont always work - an open question possibly may lead them down the right road quicker: Why has 200 Years Together by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, a bigger dissent in his day than Nelson Mandala not been published into English? You think people would be interested in the murder of over forty million people?

.... As for the importance of the existence of Israel, if Israel wasn't there then there would be an unbroken chain of Muslim lands from West Africa to the Middle East to Europe to Central Asia to South East Asia. This would not be good for the well-being of non-Muslims everywhere. With the distraction of Israel gone, Spain and Eastern Europe then Italy would be within their (the mujahidin's) sights.

I hope that you are now less confused.com.

14 September 2014 20:15

Nice try Sonny, but no banana.

Your straw man argument falls flat on its protruding proboscis, when one factors into the narrative the fact that all Muslime** invasions of the west in the last thousand years were facilitated by (you guessed it) jewish fifth columnists. If El Cid, Sobieski, Vlad Drakul and company were left to do their job unhindered and un-hamstrung by the gnawing parasites, the only reference to muslims today would be in museums -- right next to the Quagga, the Dodo and the passenger pigeon.

You are improving though. Not a single reference to St Nilus's sexuality.

The little nose behind the curtain said (20:25): “If Israel fights ISIS directly then it will increase support for ISIS from the surrounding Arab countries and from Muslims everywhere...In other words, HAVING ISRAEL ON YOUR SIDE when fighting against Muslims is as TOXIC as having people who sound like national socialists on your side when fighting against the destruction of White lands.”

The little nose behind the curtain says we must support Israel because, according to him, only Israel can save us poor goyim in the West from the MUSLIM hordes. He then says: “having Israel on YOUR SIDE when fighting against MUSLIMS is...TOXIC”

ROTFLOL!!!

Talk about confused.com

Questions for the little nose behind the curtain:

1. If having Israel on our side is toxic, what’s the point of having Israel as an ally?2. What do the goyim in the West gain from the billions of dollars in US aid sent to Israel every year (remember: having Israel on our side when fighting against Muslims is toxic)?

This will seem like a cop-out but arguing for white survival is easier than arguing for the destruction or deportation of race X or race Y. I'll leave that to those made of more heroic stuff than I am.

What sells on blogs is anger.

What turns off bloggers is not having an oven-ready solution.

His big point is that these precooked formulas are 100%. The competition on blogs is so intense that there are NO blogs that violate this rule. Even in the peak years of the Yellow Press some newspapers survived providing SOME quality.

Not so in the blog age. No blog gets impressive numbers without adhering to all the rules.

If you are pro-white and you want a blog to make it, it has to incite ANGER. It has to hit responsive notes. Being pro-White cannot compete with the good old Hate Jews.

If you want to plant ideas for future thought, Holiday will laugh his ass off at you.

But Holiday would be the first to tell you he has no interest whatsoever in The Endgame.

Thousands of anti-whites tweeted all day and got the message out there, but hardly any whites did anything at all. They did all our work for us. Only the anti-whites mentioned Hitler. It made them look hateful, not us. It worked very well.

The government had been trying to enact the bill for more than a year in an effort to confront the rise of the neo-Nazi Golden Dawn party and a surge in anti-immigrant violence.

Passed late Tuesday with 55 of the 99 lawmakers present in the 300-member Parliament voting in favor, the measure criminalizes the denial or trivialization of the Holocaust or other recognized genocides.

It also increases jail time for instigating racist violence from two years to three years and imposes fines on individuals and groups. Groups found inciting racism can be barred from receiving state funds.

The Greek Jewish community and international Jewish groups have long pressed the Greek government to take a tougher legislative stance on hate speech.

Many of Golden Dawn’s leaders are awaiting trial on charges of running a criminal organization. The party, which has 18 seats in Parliament, frequently uses Nazi imagery. Its leaders have denied the existence of Nazi death camps and gas chambers.

An interesting point that is not made is that 44 of the lawmakers either voted against the bill or abstained.

The comments section is worth checking out as well.

Good old Voltaire does it again:- "If you would know who truly rules ..."

Frank Galton, yes, I agree that having Israel on 'our side' in any fight against Muslims is indeed poison. But of course it immediately raises the same question that you do, namely, how are they a suitable ally against anyone?

The only one that springs to mind for me is that they could be very helpful indeed in the search for the real perpetrators of the 9/11 attack.

As for the jew desire that we stop “obsessing” about them; how is it any concern of yours, dear jews, what we think or talk about? We are not obsessed with jews, we are obsessed with the ruin of our lives, our children, our nations, our universities, we are obsessed with the invention of thought crimes, with the introduction of thought control in the media, we are obsessed with the oppression of typical false-flag and terrorism. And behind all of these, smirks the jew.

I for one will not blame the innocent who try to believe what they have been taught; the culprit is in every case the jew. But the jew will not stop himself, and we who know and understand are very much to blame unless we name the jew and counter him wherever we can. Unless and until the jew is stopped there will be tens and hundreds of thousands of rapes, murders, and persecutions, and we shall be remembered, if at all, only as the generation too cowardly to protect itself.

Can we at least agree that there is a huge difference between investigating an issue, and trying to persuade someone of what we believe to be the case? Mark well that we cannot investigate the true extent of jew destructiveness unless we name him, focus on him and collect the evidence. Afterwards we can look for the best means of getting the message out.

-------------------

Very good thoughts grettir.

As you point out, the jewish world-wide criminal cabal do wish we would stop "obsessing" about them as it crimps their style and grand plans to destroy White countries, among others. It's not "good for jews" to have themselves named.

As with any criminal acts, whether by local black or Mexican criminal gangs, or by the worldwide criminal gang called organised jewry, their evil activities needs to be exposed for what they are. These psychopaths have financed and engineered the horror shows such as the Jewish Revolution of 1917 in Russia, the World Wars I & II, etc., 9/11 and so on, to the latest jewish organised bloodbath against Syria.

Naming the jew at every appropriate opportunity will eventually normalize "naming the jew" and bring about a virtuous cycle of awareness among Whites in general. While not naming the jew will simply severely delay or prevent the day when the jews are exposed as the maniacs behind our destruction.

Having Israel as an ally in a fight against one Muslim country or entity would be toxic, but in an all out fight in which there were few or no more Muslims left to piss off, their help would be extremely useful.

SAVANT, I think the answer to your question is summed up in these two comments:

Uncle Nasty quoted

Passed late Tuesday with 55 of the 99 lawmakers present in the 300-member Parliament voting in favor, the measure criminalizes the denial or trivialization of the Holocaust or other recognized genocides.

...

The Greek Jewish community and international Jewish groups have long pressed the Greek government to take a tougher legislative stance on hate speech.

... and comments

An interesting point that is not made is that 44 of the lawmakers either voted against the bill or abstained.

I think it's more interesting that more than two thirds of the lawmakers were not even in the house when a small clique of organised jews pushed through their agenda. Not 55 out of 99; 55 out of 300. Who was it who said "The future belongs to those who turn up for it"?

As Katana points out

It's not "good for jews" to have themselves named.

I think the conclusion follows.

And the best part... They've gone and done it again. Been just a bit too clever. That ridiculous, self-contradictory, mutually hostile leftist alliance of anti-white victim groups is eating itself. It's becoming downright trendy to name the jew - as long as you call him a Zionist.

The little nose behind the curtain said : “Having Israel as an ally in a fight against ONE Muslim country or entity would be toxic, but in an all out fight in which there were few or no more Muslims left to piss off, their help would be extremely useful.”

LOL!!!

“Having Israel as an ally in a fight against ONE Muslim country or entity would be toxic...”

It may have escaped your attention, but the American, British and French Armed Forces have been fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Mali.

“but in an ALL OUT FIGHT”

Why would Turkey (NATO), Saudi Arabia, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Oman, Bahrain and Malaysia partake in this fantasy “all out fight” of yours?

LOL!!!

“their help would be extremely useful.”

How? What can Israel – a nation made up of 6,110,600 long-term benefit scroungers (LOL!!!) – do that the US or any of its allies can’t?

Questions for the little nose behind the curtain:

1. What do the goyim in the West gain from the billions of dollars in US aid sent to Israel every year (remember: “having Israel on our side when fighting against Muslims is toxic”)? 2. How, exactly, is Israel SAVING EASTERN EUROPE (LOL!!!) from the Islamic hordes?

AnalogMan said: “It's becoming downright trendy to name the jew - as long as you call him a Zionist.”

HAARETZ, 11 September 2014

Far from eradicating the hatred of Jews, says Chief Whip Michael Gove, anti-Semitism is now considered 'chic' by some.

Europe has forgotten the warning of the Holocaust and is plagued by a "virus" of anti-Semitism, Chief Whip Michael Gove said, adding that the hatred of Jews has attained a "radical chic" in certain circles, U.K. daily The Telegraph reported.http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/1.615312

One comment I certainly agree with is this: "You have to understand, there are untold billions of dollars of social engineering at work telling the average person that talking-about-Jews=anti-Semite and anti-Semite=evil."

One thing we can say for sure though is that even if we don't name them they won't stop attacking us as long as we defend the White race and by extension western civilisation.

---------------Good observations Savant.

Jews want us to hard-wire into our brain, through their media brainwashing machine, the idea that talking about jews in anything less than glowing terms is skating very close to the edge of full-on evil. Think of the HoloHoax! Think of the six billion!! (jewish created Inflation, does in this case assist the poor old jew cause.)

The reality, as with anything else to do with jews, is the exact opposite of what they say. In other words, NOT talking-about-Jews=pro-Semite and pro-Semite=Evil"

Yes, being pro-Semite is being pro-Evil.

The long and short reason of saying so, is that organized jewry have engineered all the major wars of the 20th and now 21st century.

Start your research engines now and spend your next few weeks, months or years discovering that fact.

Your second point, Savant - not naming the jew, will not stop the jews from destroying us, says it all. I would go further and say it invigorates them as it allows the enemy to move around us, unnamed, poisoning our societies, at will.

Not naming our enemy, as BUGS suggest, is to aid and abet our enemy by allowing them to continue to operate in secret. Which is their MO.

Being coy about the jew, the psychopaths controlling our countries, has a place for the timid. The real solution though, is for enough decent people to wake up and stand up against them and their White traitors.

If we do so we can defeat the psychopaths.

If we don't we are doomed to suffer terribly under them with no place to hide. That's what history teachers us.

One comment I certainly agree with is this: "You have to understand, there are untold billions of dollars of social engineering at work telling the average person that talking-about-Jews=anti-Semite and anti-Semite=evil."

One thing we can say for sure though is that even if we don't name them they won't stop attacking us as long as we defend the White race and by extension western civilisation.

---------------Good observations Savant.

Jews want us to hard-wire into our brain, through their media brainwashing machine, the idea that talking about jews in anything less than glowing terms is skating very close to the edge of full-on evil. Think of the HoloHoax! Think of the six billion!! (jewish created Inflation, does in this case assist the poor old jew cause.)

The reality, as with anything else to do with jews, is the exact opposite of what they say. In other words, NOT talking-about-Jews=pro-Semite and pro-Semite=Evil"

Yes, being pro-Semite is being pro-Evil.

The long and short reason of saying so, is that organized jewry have engineered all the major wars of the 20th and now 21st century.

Start your research engines now and spend your next few weeks, months or years discovering that fact.

Your second point, Savant - not naming the jew, will not stop the jews from destroying us, says it all. I would go further and say it invigorates them as it allows the enemy to move around us, unnamed, poisoning our societies, at will.

Not naming our enemy, as BUGS suggest, is to aid and abet our enemy by allowing them to continue to operate in secret. Which is their MO.

Being coy about the jew, the psychopaths controlling our countries, has a place for the timid. The real solution though, is for enough decent people to wake up and stand up against them and their White traitors.

If we do so we can defeat the psychopaths.

If we don't we are doomed to suffer terribly under them with no place to hide. That's what history teaches us.

My favorite explanation about why not to mix jews with the mantra is that "The Jews" are like a concrete bunker on a battlefield. Why would you charge that bunker that is heavily fortified and surrounded by mine fields, when you can simply go around it, cut it off and attack the weak points all around the bunker. That is the point of the Mantra, hit the enemy where they are weak and they are weak EVERYWHERE else. Whites need to know the have a HUGE problem, before they can begin to support solutions. The Mantra defines the problem for our race.

President Barack Obama will announce Tuesday (local time) that the US military will take the lead in overseeing what has been a chaotic and widely criticised response to the worst Ebola outbreak in history, dispatching up to 3000 military personnel to West Africa in an effort that could cost up to US$750 million (NZ$919m) over the next six months, according to senior administration officials.

By the end of the week, a general sent by US Africa Command will be in place in Monrovia, Liberia — the country where transmission rates are increasing exponentially — to lead the effort called Operation United Assistance. The command will help oversee and coordinate US and international relief efforts while a new, separate regional staging base will help accelerate transportation of urgently needed equipment, supplies and personnel.

In addition, the Pentagon will send engineers to set up 17 treatment centres in Liberia — each with a 100-bed capacity — as well as medical personnel to train up to 500 health-care workers a week in the region.

The president's decision to enlist the US military, whose resources are already under strain as it responds to conflicts in the Middle East, reflects the growing concern of US officials that, unless greater force is brought to bear, the epidemic could wreak havoc on the continent.

"It's this broad range of capabilities together that will turn the tide of this epidemic," said one senior administration official, who along with others spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to discuss the president's plan in advance of Obama's trip to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta on Tuesday.

The first question that springs to any sane mind is "Why bother?"

This will obviously profit the yids -- in the end, everything does.

One merely needs more info in the form of public announcements from the USG and the various multiNationals to weave a few stitches into the information net and ... voila!! all will be revealed.

Seriously, though. Is this a harbinger of planeloads of puking, crapping, bleeding, oozing niggers to complement the hordes already being deployed (sorry, sorry, rescued humanitarially (Whew! Got it.) as the moving ones are not whacking out Whitey fast enough?

What's the next move? Doing a low pass and dumping these things into lakes and reservoirs in Flyover Country?

Theoretical or given meaning that would be assumed by any rational person:-

1. Someone who is utterly obsessed with Ashkenazim (more accurately:- Khazarian Turkic Asiatics, who have totally assumed the identity of the genuinely Semitic Biblical 12 Tribes of Israel and have carried off this impersonation for nearly 1300 years, now.)

2. The "Jew-obsessed" person -- in the eyes of the Ashkenazim -- spends every waking hour dreaming about Khazars and how one may serve, defend and, ultimately worship them ... or, on the other hand is envious to the point of tooth-grinding insanity of the many, many virtues of these paragons among man (and woman). Societal, intellectual, and above all, moral.

3. To contemplate jews, the doings of jews and jewish society (such as it is) even more than jews do.

4. To sum up, the "Jew-obsessed" person's raison d'être is to actually devolve into a jew -- "scratch any White and there is a kike desperate to get out ...". Life becomes so much easier when one thinks that way.

Reality, however, is somewhat different.

A. "Jew-obsessed" means to take the slightest notice of a jew or the antics of said jew -- at the wrong time. Any jew.B. "Low Key or potential Anti-Semite" means to ignore jews -- at the wrong time -- as this can be seen as an even greater insultC. "Hate-monger":- To comment -- even in the mildest terms on a jew or the antics of said jew ... Any Jew.D. "Neo-NAZI":- To comment negatively or critically -- even in the mildest terms on a jew or the antics of said jew ... Any Jew.**E. "Spew":- A term for what is perceived as antisemitic speech. Antisemitic statements are never "spoken" or "stated" but are often "Uttered". Failing that, they are almost invariably "spewed".F. By the same token any written word or illustration denigrating jews is never actually "Written" or "Drawn". It is either "Scrawled" or "Daubed". Artistic merit or control of the language seem to fly out the window whenever the Chosen are seen to be the target.

**I was going to illustrate D. "Neo-NAZI":- To comment negatively or critically -- even in the mildest terms ... etc., etc. with an example like "Please Rabbi, be cautious. If you were to accidentally let go, and that infant was to slip off the end, he could hurt his forehead on the edge of the basin ..."

Jews aren't 'behind' anything. They're not a monolithic entity. They maybe have genetic and cultural traits that undermine the Christian West. Since Christianity and Western culture are the direct cause of communism, Universalism and anti-capitalist sentimental bullshit I really don't care.The J00z wouldn't get far here without their Goy supporters, so really it's white people you should blame.

Frankly, anyone stupid enough to buy into liberalism or communism deserves to be a slave, so who cares? Fuck 'white people', most of them are genetic detritus. The 'white race' will be worth saving after at least half of them are liquidated, and no sooner.