> On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 11:11 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:> > James Bottomley wrote:> > > The initial bsg submit went via the block git tree ... which I believe> > > you have in -mm. We only started taking the updates via the scsi tree> > > > Seven hours before you posted this, in > > <20070807001429.f8cb3b22.akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Andrew already > > noted it was not in -mm.> > > > A trivial examination of the broken-out mm patches backs up the absence > > of Jens' block tree, too.> > > > So let's put this myth / bad assumption to rest, shall we?> > Sorry ... I just assumed from the fact that it had been in the block git> tree for six months that it was also in -mm.

bsg was never in the #for-akpm branch of git-block. So I assume thatJens had it in some other branch and for some reason never pulled itacross into #for-akpm.