Rushed through legislation targeted Iran's growing Latin American influence. On December 28, Obama signed the Countering Iran in Western Hemisphere Act.

It requires the State Department to "address Iran's growing hostile presence and activity." Washington wants the Islamic Republic shut out of the region entirely. It wants it isolated globally.

In 2005, Iran had five regional embassies. Today it has 11. Washington's influence is declining. Its traditional backyard grows more independent. Over time, imperial extremism makes more enemies than friends.

Months after 9/11, Bush secretly authorized the NSA to eavesdrop on Americans lawlessly. Sweeping surveillance followed without court-approved warrants. Doing so violates core constitutional protections. Conditions now are worse than then.

On October 29, High Court oral arguments were heard. Justices will decide if lawyers, journalists, labor, media, human rights organizations, and others may challenge the constitutionality of warrantless spying.

In March 2011, the Second US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled they and others the law affects have legal standing to challenge. ACLU spokeswoman Rachel Myers called it "a really big victory."

It means potentially affected parties "don't have to prove (they've) been spied on to challenge an unlawful spy act."

The Court overruled a district judge claiming otherwise. It said "plaintiffs have good reason to believe that their communications in particular, will fall within the scope of the broad surveillance that they can assume the government will conduct."

Obama promised to do it three years ago. Instead, he hardened Bush administration policies. He elevated rogue government to a higher level. He institutionalized massive national security spying. He wants victims denied their day in court.

Doing so "represented the first time the government has acknowledged US spy activities violated the constitution since the passage of a 2008 law that overhauled surveillance laws following the uproar over the NSA's warrantless wiretapping program in the (Bush) administration."

Obama officials provided no details about Fourth Amendment violations, when they occurred, or if anyone at NSA was held accountable.

The agency's spokesman, Michael Birminghan, said its director is committed to "transparency, compliance, and oversight."

"If the government is engaged in surveillance that violated the Fourth Amendment, that is something that ought to be disturbing to not just legislators, but to the American public more generally."

Ahead of the vote, Wyden urged restraint, caution, and concern for constitutional protections.

"This is the last opportunity for the next five years for the Congress to exercise a modest measure of real oversight over this intelligence surveillance law," he stressed.

"It is not real oversight when the United States Congress cannot get a yes or no answer to the question of whether an estimate currently exists as to whether law abiding Americans have had their phone calls and emails swept up under the FISA law."

It's involved in Clapper v. Amnesty International. It filed suit. It challenges FISA Amendments Act of 2008 constitutionality. As explained above, the Second US Circuit Court of Appeals let plaintiffs' challenge the law.

It rejected the Obama administration's catch-22 argument. It claimed no need to identify whose communications are monitored. Only those targeted may do so, it said. Secrecy, of course, prevents disclosure.

Moments after George Bush signed the 2008 FISA Amendments Act, ACLU filed suit. Doing so challenged the law's constitutionality.

Ahead of Friday's vote, ACLU "call(ed) on Congress to Fix FISA by prohibiting dragnet surveillance, mandating more transparency about the government's surveillance activities, and strengthening safeguards for privacy."

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

by Anyone can be called Terrorist. Ask OWS.
Tuesday, Jan. 01, 2013 at 5:40 AM

What began with The CIA's Killing of American Citizens on American Soil via The CIA's Al CIA Duh 9-11 Attacks, which was to begin The Post 9-11 War on Islam, which was soon to Expand to The Post 9-11 War on Everyone, Everywhere, has come a long way since The CIA's Infamous 9-11 Terrorist Attacks Against The American People on American Soil. It began a Permanet State of War, in which we had a So Called Enemy that could be Anywhere, according The FBI. Of course we know the FBI was also a Part of the 9-11 Attacks, The FBI's part in the 9-11 Attacks being The Coverup and The Destruction of Any Physical Evidence concerning The Mass Murder of American Civilians on American Soil by The Intelligence Community. However in Order to Maintain their Post 9-11 Power over The American People, whom they Attacked on 9-11, they would have to make sure that we were kept in a Permanent State of War. Even long after the Death of The CIA's Scapegoat of The 9-11 Attacks, Osama bin Laden, The CIA needed the Terrorist Threat to hold on to Power. So after The CIA had Osama Bumped off in Tora Bora Back in 2001, they began to Produce a Bunch of Fake Bin Laden Videos in Order to Keep The Terrorist Threat alive, using a Company of Actors to make Propuganda Film Productions of their Dead Scapegoat for the 9-11 Attacks. However after a while it became quite obvious that these Videos were Fakes, so Osama became less and less useful as Scapegoat for the 9-11 Attacks. So they faked his Death in Pakistan and Fed his Body to the Sharks so there would be no Indentification of The Body being a Fake, aka Someone The CIA Killed in Order to Supply a Body, so they could lay their no longer useful Dead Since 2001 9-11 Scapegoat Osama to Rest in The Bellies of The Sharks. Since then they've been comming up with The Successor to Osama Story, and that of course means we can keep our Post 9-11 War Powers Alive, and continue to Enable The CIA and their DHS and FBI Cohorts to maintain their Powers over Anyone Anywhere. Anyone can be labeled a Terrorist, all they have to do is point the Finger. Just ask OWS. When Occupy became a Popular Idea, The FBI, DHS, The CIA, Local Police, and Banks all got together in a Plot to Violently Suppress The Occupy Movement. Tear Gas Cannisters were Fired into the Skulls of Hapless Victims, Students were Sprayed with Tear Gas on College Campuses, Protesters were Attacked with Batons, Protesters were Attacked with Mace, Occupy Camps were Raided in The Dark of Night, Hand Cuffs were Purposely put on to Tight in Order to Cause Pain and Injury to those Hand Cuffed and a Whole Lot More. And it all began with The Post 9-11 War Powers Domestic Spying Act, Post 9-11 Expanded Police Powers, etc. And the same could be said about Antiwar Protesters as they were also declared Terrorist by the same Powers that did the 9-11 Attacks or Assited in The Coverup of The CIA's 9-11 Attacks. Protesters, who Protested The Post 9-11 Bombings of Innocent Civilians, the Post 9-11 CIA's Devil's Drone Strikes, and Protesters who spoke out against The CIA's Post 9-11 Torture Chambers, were also Attacked in The same manner as Occupy. Attacked by A Government that previously Attacked American Civilians on American Soil in both the 9-11 Attacks and the 2001 Anthrax Attacks, which The FBI not only Failed to Blame on Islam, but has since Failed to Solve the Case, Since all Evidence would point to Fact that The Anthrax used against American Civilians on American Soil came from a US Government Laboratory to begin with. Keep that in mind while thes US Law Fakirs sell their Post 9-11 Expanded War Powers Surmons, so they can Attack You The People Anytime, Anywhere, for Any Reason, on American Soil. Just like their Cohorts in The CIA did on 9-11 and with the 2001 Anthrax Attacks.