In reference to the above BBC article published today in which Stephen Fry was asked what he might say to God at the gates of Heaven, Fry was quoted as saying,

"How dare you create a world in which there is such misery? It's not our fault? It's not right. It's utterly, utterly evil. Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid god who creates a world which is so full of injustice and pain?"

To this I say, ‘Rest easy Mr Fry, I can say with great confidence you won’t have to worry about what to say to G-d at the pearly gates’.

It’s quite clear the magnitude of ignorance and arrogance you possess, will no doubt take you to a much hotter climate than you may be anticipating.

For any human being to be so arrogant as to accuse G-d of being responsible for the atrocities and evil that man has created in today’s world is stupidity beyond belief. If ignorance were a currency, you Sir would be a very wealthy man.

I would strongly suggest you purchase a book on spirituality 101 and do a little background reading on free will before you start blaming G-d for what man has done (and continues to do) to pollute and destroy this world.

​President Trump has shot himself in the foot yet again. There are several issues around the latest ordeal with Trump taking on Nordstrom’s on behalf of his daughter over the supposed maltreatment by Nordstrom’s dumping her fashion line.First, why on earth is Trump who is supposed to be immersed in sorting out a whole myriad of our countries most pressing political problems taking to Twitter to rant about his daughters business escapades with Nordstrom’s? Does he not have a clue about how the President of the USA should be prioritizing his time and efforts on behalf of the American people on day to day basis? His public rants on behalf of his daughter are totally unprofessional and totally hypocritical. Setting aside the obvious degradation of the presidency, he has once again opened an absolute can of worms over his blatant hypocritical views and actions.

For instance, in January of this year, he scolded General Motors for "sending Mexican made model of Chevy Cruze to U.S. car dealers-tax free across the border." ''Make in U.S.A. or pay big border tax," he said. And yet he’s got the gull to tweet the world about Nordstrom injustices to his daughters product line which just so happens to be produced entirely in various Asian countries and then imported and sold by high society fashion outlets such as Nordstrom’s. This is about as is hypocritical as it gets for any businessman let alone the President of the USA who claims to making America great again!And yet, as President Trump tweets publically so the world over can see his outrage over his daughters Nordstrom’s palava, we’re supposed to take him at his word he will never discuss anything to do with his entire business empire with his sons in private? Trump’s behaviour isn’t becoming of any President and if continued threatens to alienate those who put him in the White House to begin with.

​by Sam Johnson | WCM (image by A.F. Branco)The popes recent speech on Vatican radio promoting truth and avoiding hypocrisy along with his press release implying Trump is another Hitler smacks as the ultimate self-delusional hypocrisy coming from the latest of multiple Popes who have failed miserably to cleanse the Vatican of decades if not centuries of corruption, moral decay and physical abuse by its priests, bishops and cardinals within the church. Scandals too numerous to count involving gay clergy, paedophile crimes and financial scandals that would command prison sentences in any other country with accountable laws have been swept under the rug at best and actually promoted at worse.During the popes recent message on Vatican radio, he urged Christians ‘to always tell the truth to avoid succumbing to hypocrisy which he described as a kind of spiritual schizophrenia that makes us say many things but without putting them into practice.’ Oh really? Apparently Frances needs a brush off the dust of the Vatican library’s history books and read about the well documented role his beloved church played in the Holocaust. It might make him think twice about sounding alarm bells insinuating Trump is another Hitler or about preaching to his flock about truth and hypocrisy.And just how hypocritical is the Pope being about accusing Trump of being another Hitler? According to holocasitonine.org (and many other credible sources) it’s well documented the Church played a major roll in supporter Hitler’s Nazi Germany during the war and was a number one protector of Nazi war criminals post WWII:“Senior German Nazi criminals escaped prosecution after World War II by the use of different “ratlines “ spread over Europe, which were operated via a network of Vatican contacts. The Catholic Church believed this effort would contribute to the “re-Christianization” of Europe and feared the threat to Europe of paganism and communism. In the pursuit of its political and spiritual interests, it was quick to forgive Nazi war criminals. Welcoming former sinners back to the bosom of the Church seemed a higher calling than turning them over to war crimes investigators. According to many church officials who were questioned about this practice: “You don’t understand us, but we did the right thing,” It’s estimated that 5,000 Nazi leaders managed to escape thanks to this network.Forging your enemy is a formidable principal to live by. However, if a person commits a crime, they have to face the legal authorities and receive their just punishment. Otherwise where is justice in the world? Frances’ Church helping criminals escape justice doesn’t all go down well for his holier than thou attitude in preaching truth and avoiding hypocrisy.So why is the pope so concerned about pointing a finger at Trump at this potentially major positive junction in American history? One ploy is if the Pope accuses someone else then by default it means the church has no blame (or shame). Or he might be using an age old diversion tactic to take the heat off further scrutiny over Vatican scandals. Or more likely, the Pope is genuinely concerned the shocking new direction of the American people through Trump and the UK’s vote for Brexit is forever changing the dynamics of the establishment that further threatens to undermine the Churches control and influence over its dwindling congregations.

The latest supposed revelation about Trump having secret inroads with Moscow is yet another load of balderdash from fruitcakes of the third degree. And that pretty much sums it up. What will the Democrats come up with next?

In case anybody hasn’t noticed this new set of documents unsurprisingly was compiled by a source who openly admits, 'The dossier, includes specific, unverified, and potentially unverifiable allegations of contact between Trump aides and Russian operatives …’ Be real. This is about as fake news as it gets. And let’s not forget to put the whole bogus claim into context. It’s always important to ask the key question, does the source - in this case Buzzfeed - have anything to gain from these claims. Besides achieving instant limelight, Buzzfeed is known for sensationalist articles which gauge success by just how viral they go on social media. The fact that Trump is heading to the White house in a matter of days, well, the answer is obvious.

First we hear that Russia has hacked the DNC in order to throw the US election in favour of trump. But to date not one shred of evidence has surfaced to prove these allegations. The report materialized by the CIA was far more concerned about deaminizing RT news than putting forward anything close to representing real evidence incriminating Putin and his government.

This latest attempt to demonize Trump is a deliberate act of sabotage and the real sources of this rubbish know they can put this kind of fake news out there and a high percentage of Americans and social media will believe it’s so, because McCarthyism is alive and well in America. Yet if the Russians were to produce the same low level drivel that claimed the US government influenced a Russian election you can bet the vast majority of people led by the Neocons would be screaming foul play expressing the ultimate double standard. In fact, that’s exactly what happened in the past. In July 1996, time magazine published a revelatory article entitled, ‘RESCUING BORIS - THE SECRET STORY OF HOW FOUR U.S. ADVISERS USED POLLS, FOCUS GROUPS, NEGATIVE ADS AND ALL THE OTHER TECHNIQUES OF AMERICAN CAMPAIGNING TO HELP BORIS YELTSIN WIN’.​Yet with a revelation like this, the western press seems to be suffering a severe case of amnesia.The overwhelming irony of the truth of the matter is that real news based on undeniable facts released by WikiLeaks (which no one has denied as truth) continues to stay well below the radar of virtually every major outlet within mainstream western media. The degree of hypocrisy is mind blowing. And the real and ongoing hidden agenda of the Neocon establishment is now rearing its ugly head with the full intention of derailing and delegitimizing the Trump administration in any way possible before his inauguration on the 20th.

The claim from CNN and the rest of the western press about the Russians hacking the Presidential election along with Obama’s threat to unleash his revenge on Russian is just about as realistic as Hillary Clinton passing a lie detector test.There’s not one shred of evidence of any Russian meddling in the election in the first instance. On the contrary, telling the public it’s true just because the CIA says so and then refusing to so show any proof - is the oldest trick in the book. Based on well documented historical CIA corruption and deception, how can anyone possibly say with any certainty if and when the CIA is actually speaking the truth about anything? The latest CIA pre-election scandal over Killary’s emails speaks for itself.And isn’t it amazing that when two congressional Intelligence committees recently decided to investigate the claim by 17 security agencies who accused Russia of electoral hacking, not one member of any agency was willing to step up to the plate with any evidence to testify, so the meetings had to be cancelled. Now that’s evidence you can hang your democratic hat on. The truth is, Obama’s chest beating serves three purposes. First, he's doing is level best to undermine Trumps new administration before he enters the Oval Office by implying Trump got in through the Russian back door. Second, Obama and what’s left of the Democratic Party are still desperately trying to deflect attention away from Hillarys deplorable email scandal and the underhanded tactics used by the DNC in the first instance. By creating a tough guy image as he exists the White House, Obama is trying to show he’s ready to fight the big bad Russians – McCarthyism at its best – because he knows that once Trump takes over, the Democrats can scream foul play and say ‘I told you he’s in with Putin’ when Trump seeks peace with the Russians.And thirdly and most importantly, Obama is using the CIA propaganda black hole to desperately try to delegitimize the election results and turn the American public against the Trump administration before the inauguration on January 20th.

By Sam Johnson | World Corruption Monitor​What seems to be a well-choreographed drama is now unfolding in the UK with Theresa May and the Tories already starting to undermine a full and unconditional Brexit. Until October, May’s mantra was Brexit means Brexit’ and that Parliament should have no say in the Brexit process. Then her first massive step down occurred when according to the Huffington Post, May said ‘she would (all of a sudden) allow Tory MPs to back a Labour call for Parliament to be able to “properly scrutinise” her Brexit strategy before the formal exit process begins in an apparent attempt to see off a backbench rebellion.’ Backbencher rebellion - my eye. This was part of ‘the plan’ all along.Now all of sudden we see Mondays headlines ‘Tory MPs may back Labour call for disclosure of Brexit plan’. And we have it in today’s news that labour has indeed tabled a motion which “calls on the prime minister to commit to publishing the government’s plan for leaving the EU before article 50 is invoked”. So just when have the Tories backed Labour on any motion they have put forward? This is the beginning of the end for Brexit. It’s no small secret that the majority of both Tory and Labour MP’s would give their right arm to stay in the EU. And Therese May who was supposed to be championing the people has now given parliament the back door hammer they’ve been looking for. I can’t help wondering if there’s been a hidden agenda all along and the tip of the ice berg is now rearing its ugly little head. But most would say the PM has clearly been in favour of carrying out Brexit – to honour the Peoples vote of course. Maybe so, but what about the leaked video speech that surfaced a month before the Brexit vote in which the Guardian reported,‘Theresa May privately warned that companies would leave the UK if the country voted for Brexit during a secret audience with investment bankers a month before the EU referendum. A recording of her remarks to Goldman Sachs, leaked to the Guardian, reveals she had numerous concerns about Britain leaving the EU. It contrasts with her nuanced public speeches, which dismayed remain campaigners before the vote in June.’Furthermore, according to the Guardian, ‘May’s refusal to take part in the remain campaign led Craig Oliver, David Cameron’s former chief of communications, to wonder if she was secretly an “enemy agent” for the other side. However, others have suggested she believed in the arguments for staying in but was keeping her powder dry in case of a pro-Brexit vote.’ And keep her powder dry she did. Therese May’s cunning approach and smooth manoeuvring to become PM in the wake of the Brexit referendum reminds me of another high flyin ruthless female Politian who ironically also delivered a secret speech to Goldman Sachs on Wall Street during her position for a presidential campaign. According the Guardian,‘In the US, the Democratic presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, made three private speeches to Goldman Sachs staff in 2013, the contents of which she originally refused to divulge during a bitter primary contest with left wing rival Bernie Sanders. She was paid $675,000 (£554,000), and transcripts eventually released by WikiLeaks show her (also) taking a much softer line on Wall Street than she had publicly proclaimed.’This doesn’t all go well for Brexit is Brexit. It certainly seems there’s been double dealing going on all along and It’ll be interesting to observe which part of May’s covert plan surfaces next in the sell-out of the British people.

Well its official, the UK government will go down in history as being at the forefront of taking away any last vestige of democratic rights from its citizens with the passing into law the so called ‘snoopers charter’. What a joke. If anyone had any doubt of the real motive behind this brain dead legislation as being anything other than control and suppression of UK citizens, then think again. Case in point. Isn’t it amazing that the only amendment to the snoopers charter bill passed by MPs in parliament was to protect from – God forbid - being spied upon themselves! No, we certainly couldn’t stand to have our exemplary government officials being spied upon – that would be a terrible affront to Democracy!​But giving up you privacy is for a good cause as we're now we’re going to get those nasty terrorists. Maybe, but first we should ask ourselves who exactly are the terrorist here anyway? There are enough well document false flag operations that have occurred over the last decade in the western world to convince even the greatest sceptics there is more going on here than meets the eye. Its false flag operations like Charlie Hebdo that catapulted the Snoopers Charter Act through parliament in the first instance – ironically all under the guise of protecting us. Isn’t it fair to say that by anybody’s definition terrorism should also include any group or organization that aims to take away people’s rights to privacy. And to claim the UK now has the greatest legislation in the western word which not only exposes those bad terrorists but is also totally transparent is nothing short of ludicrous – not to mention the ultimate hypocrisy. So what’s next? As Edward Snowden would say, ‘Sometimes the scandal is not what law was broken, but what the law allows.’

It boggles the mind when the government which is supposed to serve the people is so out of control with its rules, regulations and laws that in the end it actually oppresses and punishes the most vulnerable in society it’s supposed to protect. Take for instance the recent story out of Kanas city Missouri where - to quote from the article:

‘A volunteer organization that helps feed the needy, recently felt the wrath of the American government and now they are unable to help out people who actually need it. The group was set to donate 3,000 pounds of meat and 1,200 pounds of side dishes to charity — and then the government forced them to throw it all away so that none of the people in desperate need of food could consume it’.

Matt Agorist from the Natural Blaze explained what happened,

“Health officials say it was destroyed because it wasn’t from a permitted establishment, and they couldn’t track where the food had been, therefore they couldn’t ensure its safety, reports ABC 7 … Kookers Kares president said if health inspectors had any questions they should have just asked … Instead, hundreds already went hungry and it appears as many as 3,000 people won’t get meals as a result, according to the report.”

​So big government once again steps in and self-righteously claims they were actually protecting those poor hungry souls from the dangers of bad food or worse yet (G-d forbid) – getting sick as a result. What ever happen to using a little common sense when dealing with people in real need. This is clearly a case of bureaucracy gone mad and the US government has a lot to answer for when it comes to excessive bureaucracy. Surely the right balance between a government protecting its citizens on the one hand and providing for them on the other, should always error on the side of finding a way to at least feeding the hungry. Or have I missed something here?

by Sam Johnson | WCMWell we thought things were going to change in Washington with Donald Trump getting elected as the next President of the USA. And we were right - they're changing already. Unfortunately, the change is turning out to be Trump reneging on one of his biggest and toughest campaign stances against Hillary Clinton – to put her behind bars. So Mr Trump, what makes you any different now than any other politician – for instance Mr Obama who reneged on just about every one of his campaign promises as well? Clearly your tough talk was obvious just that – all talk.

What happened to your tough talk about far better Americans having been put away for far less than what Killary has done? And what about the Clintons being above the law? Your high and mighty stance obviously went right out the window as soon as you secured the American vote to enter the White house. Your should be ashamed on yourself Mr Trump - for portraying yourself as a righteous saviour of America when in fact your spots are turning out to be the same colour as the vermin you were supposedly fighting against. You have no backbone and are not fit to lead America.

You are either the biggest hypocrite on the face of this planet or are in fact the biggest fool going. Time will tell but if this trend continues I suspect you’ll turn out to be both. May G-d help America – she is certainly going to need it with the likes of a spineless leader at the helm.

America has two Laws: One for the average American and another for Hillary (and any other social elites like her).

So let me get this straight, the FBI slaps Hillary on the hand and says ‘Bad Girl’, but you’re free to go now and run for President. Right.

And the guardian goes on to say, ‘Critically, the FBI said that other similar cases in which a prosecution had been sought involved evidence of “wilful or intentional” breaches of the rules, “vast quantities” of data or “indications of disloyalty or efforts to obstruct justice”. “We do not see that here,” they said.

Clinton has always insisted that no classified emails were sent or received using her private account, although some were later reclassified by intelligence officials when the state department began publishing some of the traffic in a transparency exercise.

Nonetheless the detail of the FBI’s investigation revealed that of the 30,000 emails returned to the state department, 110 emails in 52 chains were determined to contain classified information at the time they were sent. Eight of those chains contained information that was top secret at the time, 36 chains contained secret information at the time, and eight contained confidential information, the lowest level of classification, he said. So on the one hand, Clinton said all along no classified emails were sent or received using her private account but the FBI finds a significant number of emails were in fact top secret? Have I missed something folks? Yet the FBI says no rules were broken? Dah.

Yet several thousand work related emails were not among those returned to the government and appeared to have been deleted. Dah again. No obstruction of justice here. So a little slap on the hands and we won’t do that again will we? No, no, no says Hillary not at least until I get to be President.

There certainly appears to be two laws in America, one where the average American who pulled this kind of stunt would end up in Guantanamo Bay and the other where social elites like Hilary are sent to the White House.