i've got a bowler who is 20 years old this year. he is still getting trained for a few more weeks, should I continue to train him for the entire year? using the spreadsheet he should pop twice in primary and 3 times in secondary. not sure if I should give him nets or train two 17 yos.

That's a personal decision, but I think 20 is still eminently trainable, depending on the skill level you want to take him to. It depends, though, on whether you're training for your team or training to sell. All of my training is still training for my team, although Sarge could necessitate thinking more about economics depending on how FC works out.

If you're training for your team, then it certainly still makes sense to train at 20. Aside from the U19 guys that you run into the ground, a player won't really be finished, training-wise, until they hit 21 or 22, IMO.

i think secondaries really play into this because a bowler who is woeful/strong in batting is at 29*

I set my target at 450, but I wonder if I set it at 424 my team would declare overnight? there should be a button to declare over night so you start out bowling the first over at the start of play on the next day.

anyways, I'm thinking of changing my last 4 guys to attacking/very attacking and seeing if they stick around to get to 450 and then start bowling. my have to put 2 or 3 bowlers on attacking orders as well to see if i can get some wickets.

i really don't know why they can't take one. Gotten 2 so far in this morning session and would like 2 more before lunch I find it funny that a guy like Turner, who probably has crappy concentration and wouldn't last too long in a ODI has lasyed 148 balls.

Play in Australia div V. My team is too good for the teams below me but just a bit behind those ahead of me so it is going to be another season or 2 at least until I can challenge for promotion in the OD series.