(Newser)
–
The companies that run the Algerian gas plant overrun by militants last week decided against deploying armed guards in the large compound, depending instead on government patrols in the area and steel wire fences for protection, reports the New York Times. Many experts think an armed force, common at many production and drilling facilities in the region, could have slowed the attack and allowed more workers to get away. "The attack clearly caught everybody by surprise," said one consultant.

Algerian officials counter that the size and organization of the attack would have made it very difficult to resist. But security experts say the important thing is to slow attacks, not necessarily stop them entirely, to give the government time to react. "To re-create confidence, it will take a lot of hand-holding with insurance companies, service companies, and investment bankers," said another oil executive. Click to read about one survivor's harrowing escape through the desert.

You've got to be kidding - you are upset there weren't armed guards at a gas plant, but you get upset when we suggest we should have armed guards around a school. Problem is you only think certain people should be armed and the rest of us just trust that you'll take care of us little people.

reallybig

Jan 24, 2013 1:25 PM CST

TRUTH BE TOLD ..... IT sounds a lot like what happened in Benghazi doesn't it. --- Of course the lying left wing news media will ask more questions about why there wasn't enough security there .. than ask the question, why wasn't there more security at Benghazi. -- TRUTH BE TOLD -- The left wing lying news media will cover-up the Obama CIA assassination of Ambassador Stevens, but will investigate the Algerians. ------- REALLY