If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Try asking that one if you really want to gain information. I somehow doubt that is your intent, though.

I asked more than one question, but of course, you don't want to answer any. But, okay, for the sake of argument, "Do you find Iron Dome objectionable?" And, if not, why did you cite our underwriting it as an issue? Also, what did you mean by corralling Egypt and why did you say that Israel spit in our eye on settlements?

Originally Posted by Arroyo_Doble

He was being a dick and I called him on it. Now he is doing his filibuster schtick and blustering for the boot licks.

Sue me.

I'm not the one being a dick. You make snarky cracks about an ally, and then refuse to back up your BS. Sorry if my calling you on your BS offends you. Now, since I've asked the question in a manner that you might not find objectionable, let's have an answer, or do I have to add "Mother, may I?" before you respond?

Well they are one of our longest standing allies. And we share a common enemy...that being about 95% of the countries that make up the U.N.

They back us at the U.N. consistiently as well.

That's what friends and allies do.

Only Libtards like you don't seem to grasp that concept.

we corral Egypt,

How exactly have we done that? You think that by somehow turning the entire country over to a group of Islamic thugs we're corralling them? Sounds to me like the U.S. by supporting the atrocity known as the "Arab Spring"...green lighted what's happenening there now.

If we'd actually "corralled" Egypt...Mubarak would still be in Power.

and we underwrite Iron Dome and what do we get for it in return?

You got a link to back that up?

Constant pissing and moaning about what a meanie our president is and a spit in the eye on settlements.

Can you provide any evidence tht Obama has been friendly with Israel in the way past Presidents have?

May you can find some kernel of light in a story on one of his visits to Israel to meet with it's leaders.

Translated: I can't bullshit myway out of this one so I'll accuse HIM of being the asshole.

Well played fanboi...well played.

It would be if it wasn't so obvious. And, let's not forget that anyone else who sees through his BS is a "boot lick".

Originally Posted by txradioguy

Well they are one of our longest standing allies. And we share a common enemy...that being about 95% of the countries that make up the U.N.

They back us at the U.N. consistiently as well.

That's what friends and allies do.

Only Libtards like you don't seem to grasp that concept.

How exactly have we done that? You think that by somehow turning the entire country over to a group of Islamic thugs we're corralling them? Sounds to me like the U.S. by supporting the atrocity known as the "Arab Spring"...green lighted what's happenening there now.

If we'd actually "corralled" Egypt...Mubarak would still be in Power.

You got a link to back that up?

Can you provide any evidence tht Obama has been friendly with Israel in the way past Presidents have?

May you can find some kernel of light in a story on one of his visits to Israel to meet with it's leaders.

Careful, there, or he'll accuse you of "filibustering". Talk about Orwellian. He makes unsubstantiated assertions and snide insinuations about our policies towards Israel, and when I call him on it and ask him to say what he means, he accuses me of exactly what he's doing. Bravo.

Seems like... I don't know... if there was any a time for the UN to prove it has a purpose to exist, it's now in Egypt. Libya. Or Syria (soon). Countries just coming out of a revolution need international monitors to protect civilians.

Also, there's a reason the prevailing cynical thought of the 60s, 70s, and 80s was that it's better to have brutal dictators in charge over there than democracies that will turn into Islamic theocracies after the 1st election.

In retrospect, we'd be better off today if we'd have let the communists have Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran.