Watch

Watching this resources will notify you when proposed changes or new versions are created so you can keep track of improvements that have been made.

Favorite

Favoriting this resource allows you to save it in the “My Resources” tab of your account. There, you can easily access this resource later when you’re ready to customize it or assign it to your students.

Examples

There are many examples of both micro- and macrosociological studies.
One of the most famous early micro-sociological studies was, "The Cab Driver and His Fare," published in 1959 by Fred Davis.
Davis spent six months working as a taxi driver in Chicago, and observed the interactions between himself and his fares (the people who hired his taxi services).
He found that the relationship between taxi driver and fare was unique because it was so short, random, and unlikely to be repeated.
Given these characteristics of the relationship, how could riders trust that drivers would take them where they wanted without cheating them, and how could drivers trust that riders would pay and tip them fairly at the end of the trip?
Davis suggested that much of the interaction between driver and rider boiled down to resolving these issues and attempting to ensure trust.

Dramaturgical analysis can be used to explain many types of social interactions.
Consider, for example, how front and back stage spaces are managed during a visit to the doctor.
When you arrive at the doctor's office, you are on stage as you present yourself to the receptionist.
As you are shown to an exam room, you are briefly ushered into a back stage space.
The attendant leaves and you briefly relax as you change into an exam gown and prepare yourself for your next performance, which begins when the doctor enters the room or pushes back the curtain.
Once again, you are on stage.

Full Text

Sociological approaches are differentiated by the level of analysis.
Macrosociology involves the study of widespread social processes .
Microsociology involves the study of people at a more interpersonal level, as in face-to-face interactions.

Macro and Micro Perspectives in Sociology

Just as scientists may study the natural world using different levels of analysis (e.g., physical, chemical, or biological), sociologists study the social world using different levels of analysis.

The macro-level study of widespread social processes has been the moredominant approach, and has been practiced since sociology's origins in the founding work of figures like Emile Durkheim.
Durkheim, for example, studied the large-scale shift from homogenous traditionalsocieties to industrialized societies, where each individual played a highly specialized role.
The tendency toward macrosociology is evident in the kinds of questions that early sociologists asked: What holds societies together?
How are norms (and deviance) established and handled by societies?
What factors lead to social change, and what are the results of this change?
Macrosociologists focus on society as a whole, as something that is prior to, and greater than, the sum of individual people.

Studying social life on the micro-level is a more recent development (in the early and mid-twentieth century) in the history of the field, and was pioneered by proponents of the symbolic interactionism perspective, namely George Herbert Mead, Herbert Blumer, and Erving Goffmann.
Mead was a pragmatist and behaviorist, which means several things.

To pragmatists, true reality does not exist "out there" in the real world.
It "is actively created as we act in and toward the world.
"

People remember and base their knowledge of the world on what has been useful to them, and are likely to alter what no longer "works.
"

People define the social and physical "objects" they encounter in the world according to their use for them.

If we want to understand actors, we must base that understanding on what people actually do.

Blumer built on Mead's work.
He believed that individuals create their own social reality through collective and individual action, and that the creation of social reality is a continuous process.
Goffman elaborated on both Mead and Blumer by formulating the dramaturgical approach .
He saw a connection between the acts people put on in their daily life and theatrical performances.
In social interaction, like in theatrical performance, there is a front region where the "actors" (individuals) are on stage in front of the audience.
This is where the positive aspect of the idea of self and desired impressions is highlighted.
There is a back region, or stage, that can also be considered a hidden or private place where individuals can be themselves and step out of their role or identity in society.
Face-to-face interactions are, thus, a stage where people perform roles and practiceimpression management (i.e. "saving face").
Other scholars have since developed new research questions and methods for studying micro-level social processes.

Micro- and macro-level studies each have their own benefits and drawbacks.
Macrosociology allows observation of large-scale patterns and trends, but runs the risk of seeing these trends as abstract entities that exist outside of the individuals who enact them on the ground.
Microsociology allows for this on-the-ground analysis, but can fail to consider the larger forces that influence individual behavior.