Legislating Morality: Laws Are Meant to Protect Us from Others

Laws Are Supposed to Protect Us from Others

Without getting into specifics as to drugs or drug statistics, I believe we can still have a discourse about the constitutionality of making crimes out of things that people do to themselves. Just for a moment or two, cast away your personal feelings about drug abuse, because personal feelings aside, because there is no legitimate reason to incarcerate by the thousands people who have been convicted of using drugs.

These laws have stemmed from moral beliefs, but our government was never intended to prosecute or persecute people on the basis of morality. Isn't that why there was a revolution between the British and the colonists?

We can prohibit actions in the workplace, while behind the wheel of a car and other situations where another person or persons safety could be at risk, but do we have the right to dictate what people do in their own homes?

If you think that isn't happening, consider urine drug screens. Suppose a person indulges only on the weekend when s/he is off work and home. Monday morning that person is no longer mentally or physically impaired, but if a urine drug screen was performed there's a likelihood that a drug or drugs would be revealed. The unimpaired person is likely out of a job for flunking a drug screen.

Legalize Drugs?

Source

Source

History Is Our Greatest Teacher

The United States has already waged war on another mild-altering substance, namely alcohol. Prohibition was a disaster, creating an empire for mobsters and bootleggers. The war on drugs is no different.

While my main concern is the use of laws to dictate morality, the legalization of drugs is also worth consideration. If drugs were legalized and handled properly by the government (is that possible?), an empire just as profitable as alcohol ever was would be crumbled. Take away the profit in drug dealing and who wants to do it any longer?

Gang violence would decrease and drug dealers would no longer haunt neighborhoods. Prisons would again have capacity, meaning no new prisons would be necessary. There would be a reduced need for parole and probation officers or correctional staff. Court dockets would no longer be overflowing.

And all of these positives for the community and tax payers? Make no mistake, crime control is big business. Don't think that everyone who opposes legalization of drugs does so on a moral basis; it is the bottom line--their bottom line--that is at stake.

It is a fact that the United States has more people incarcerated per
capita than any other developed nation. Take the time to find out how
many of those in prison are there for drug use offenses. You will be astounded.

I
don't see the current legal system changing any time soon as far as
drug use and incarceration goes, but it needs to. I'd like to believe
that the Supreme Court
would cut down a law that allows a drug user to be arrested, but my
hopes are dim here also. It won't be until people such as you and me
take a long hard look at this situation and make our thoughts known that
change will occur.

Related Hubs

Laws, Morals, and the Bible: Is There a Connection?Calvin Coolidge said, Men do not make laws. They do but discover them. Laws must be justified by something more than the will of the majority. They must rest on the eternal foundations of righteousness. Was he right? The short answer is "yes." This

Moral Consciousness and Human FreedomConsciousness The consciousness is the power that has the spirit to perceive itself. It is the intuition that one must be the changes that take place therein, the function for which we know our inner...

Obama Declares Decriminalization of Drugs a Topic Worthy of Debate

Nathan Deal: Jailing Drug Addicts Is \'Draining To Our State\'Newly-elected Georgia Governor Nathan Deal (R) announced Monday in his inaugural address that putting drug addicts and abusers in jail was placing an unsustainable financial and civic burden on his state. Here are his comments about drug enforcement,

Minding My Own Business Comments

No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.

sending

AUTHOR

L.L. Woodard

7 years agofrom Oklahoma City

abbykorinnelee, I've seen the same thing with potential employees and co-workers. Now, if these people were impaired on the job, that would be something else. But a positive urine screen only proves past use of many of the drugs, especially marijuana.

Abigayle Malchow

7 years agofrom Ripon Wisconsin

I have been believing the same thing for many years now. I have had some of the best employees that were let go due to not passing a urine test and they were impossible to replace.

AUTHOR

L.L. Woodard

7 years agofrom Oklahoma City

Thanks for joining in Jess_C. I have less trouble with the punishments for drug sellers, but I maintain that locking people up for what they do do themselves is ridiculous and should be illegal.

Jess_C

7 years ago

Often times drug abusers and sellers incur harsher punishments then those who are convicted of much greater crimes that involve the harming of others or others property. It is sad when we punish people more for hurting themselves then we do when they effect the well being of others.

AUTHOR

L.L. Woodard

7 years agofrom Oklahoma City

Thanks for the comment, multimastery. Jails and prisons are big business in the U.S.

multimastery

7 years ago

Yes I agree some minor drug related situations are too extreme. Jails & prisons are too overcrowded to send people there for a petty or one-time offense.

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)

Google AdSense Host API

This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)

This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)

Facebook Login

You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)

Maven

This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)

We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.

Conversion Tracking Pixels

We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.

Statistics

Author Google Analytics

This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)

Comscore

ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)

Amazon Tracking Pixel

Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)