Subscribe to this blog

Follow by Email

Teslas Are Not Cars. Crash Test Reveals the Truth

If your Tesla gets banged up, few can fix it and it costs thousands of dollars for those who can, for a fender bender. Tesla is a one piece aluminum joke. And the joke appears to be played on the buyers of the car.

I told everyone this car was a bad joke because of the owner's desires to:

1. End manual driving,

2. Blast an atomic bomb on Mars to warm it up (and old Israeli student idea), and

3. Go live on Mars to escape nuclear destruction.

Please do not support Elon Musk, the delusional owner of Tesla or trust him with the future of technology in the United States.

...News flash: These things are not cars. They are more like giant
computers, with an 18-inch screen and a 1,200-pound battery. None of the
components looked anything like car parts. Only the wheels belied any
connection with transportation.

It took two months to finish the repairs. Since Tesla would only sign
off on the car when it was perfect, it was sent back to the factory in
Fremont three times for additional realignment and recalibration.

The final bill came to $32,000. The good news is that my lithium ion
battery was fine, which would have cost an extra $30,000 to replace.

Understand that Tesla is a fraud, a hoax, in my opinion. It certainly is not crash friendly. It was given the highest rating by Consumer Reports as the best car ever made. If a fender bender cannot be fixed for less than $30,000 dollars as the article relates, then it can't be the best car ever made. It could be a car that leads one to financial distress and serious inconvenience because you don't get a new Tesla to drive as a loaner car. Cheap Bas****s.

If anyone owns Tesla Stock, $TSLA, they should consider this man's story before taking any action. I am not an attorney nor a stock counselor. I just think people need to understand what is really going on with Tesla.

More on Elon Musk's delusions in addition to the belief that he built a good car:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Join Talkmarkets for Financial Information. It is free! https://goo.gl/QZff5YI have written a lot of vetted articles that are exclusive** to Talkmarkets. Sorting a portion of them by subject will give the reader an opportunity to make sense of it all. I am adding a glossary of terms at the bottom of this page.For readers interested in economic subjects of the day, these top 30 themes are my efforts to make understanding economics easier:I have pinned the following article to the top because it is an insight into my personal life, as well as a commentary on isms. Capitalism is still the greatest system for creating wealth. However, it is often mixed, and mixturism is a factor in its success or failure:

There is further study in the articles I have cited for you at the end of this article. People must, must understand that Donald Trump is a divider of races and ethnicity, because at heart he is a fascist. Fascism seeks the purity of the races. Fascism is the opposite of what America stands for. Keep in mind that Donald Trump is highly influenced by Anarcho Capitalist, Murray Rothbard. This is an email I sent to an author online. It is slightly muddled, but overall quite accurate in its assessment of Libertarian Murray Rothbard:

Hi Steve,
I agree with your article on Rothbard, mostly. However, as a British court ruled, Zionism is not the essence of what it means to be Jewish. Therefore, I hate antiSemitism, and embrace antiZionism. I have both religious and non religious reasons for taking this stand. And the court absolves me of racism. After all my natural father was Jewish. And more and more Jews hate Zionism. And Zionism is quite multiracial at this point.
So, Trump actually is …

John Mauldin published an article regarding the economics of Donald Trump. I share many of his views. I think the article deserves to be discussed further.

It isn't as if John Mauldin is happy with the continual drive toward negative yields and the new normal. I believe he is like many, willing to fight for higher interest rates within reason and within the economic boundaries that exist. He is on board with the Fed, unlike other central banks, and is willing to risk recession to avoid negative rates:

Meanwhile, the Fed is in the middle of a long-overdue policy turn. There’s still a risk that they will find they started tightening just in time for a recession, which is also long overdue. I was convinced last summer that they would push rates negative in that scenario. Negative rates could yet happen, but I think they wi…