Cannot Lock Resource For Atomic Existence Check

Contents

With those two scenarios, dependencies exist related to the mount options and implementation. As I understood from reading your thread, the conclusion to your conundrum was to implement a database solution, right? So, the solution would look smth like this: % try to move the file until succeed: while ~movefile(lockSource,lockDest) pause(.1) end movefile(lockDest,lockSource) % make the lock file available dtach: /tmp/socket: Address already in use 1 share|improve this answer edited May 31 '12 at 22:06 Michael Mrozek♦ 45.8k19146183 answered May 31 '12 at 19:16 AndresVia 1044 add a comment| up Check This Out

Ensure that file updates do not fail because files are open for writing by other applications or ColdFusion tags. Race conditions generally involve one or more processes accessing a shared resource (such a file or variable), where this multiple access has not been properly controlled.

In general, processes do not To view your watch list, click on the "My Newsreader" link. Keeping all resources locked would limit concurrency.

Flock

Is every NP-hard problem computable? When code in a cflock tag block with the type readOnly is running, code in other cflock tag blocks with the same scope attribute and the readOnlytype attribute can run, but ln -s ${f} ${f}.lock; do :; done unlock current dir (assumption, the running process really acquired the lock): mv lock deleteme && rm deleteme unlock a file (assumption, the running process

Terms Privacy Opt Out Choices Advertise Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News. mkdir creates a directory if it doesn't exist yet, and if it does, it sets an exit code. For example: Files.move(src, dst, StandardCopyOption.ATOMIC_MOVE); share|improve this answer edited Oct 5 at 0:21 Dave Jarvis 16.6k25106206 answered May 10 '12 at 10:49 Eirik W 1,5101216 8 If you specify ATOMIC_MOVE, Lock the Application scope.

So let's just say "it should work under normal conditions". Github Those are two separate steps! This is because your checking of the presence of the PIDFILE and its conditional creation is not done in an atomic operation. –maxschlepzig Jun 13 '15 at 12:40 +1 I am sure there there is a better solution than this suggestion — sn18 2009/12/19 08:24 Note: While perusing the Internet, I found some people asking if the mkdir method works

I thought of another mechanism: file1 = tempname; fclose(fopen(file1, 'w')); lockfile = 'D:\Temp\locked'; while ~movefile(file1, lockfile) pause(0.1); end % Now file has been moved to lockfile. % Another instance cannot do Any advises on how it could be realized otherwise are much appreciated! > > Thank you, > Max See a workaround here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3451343/automically-writing-a-file-in-matlab/3452143#3452143 Regards, David Subject: locking file access OR exchanging Tags make it easier for you to find threads of interest. Only one process will result in a successful mkdir, all others will fail.

Github

The OpenWall documentation states that "Processes may not make hard links to files they do not have write access to." In the LSM version, the rules are as follows: if Once a deadlock occurs, neither of the users can do anything to break the deadlock, because the execution of their requests is blocked until the deadlock is resolved by a lock Flock see more linked questions… Related 311Extract substring in bash126How to detect if my shell script is running through a pipe?2Shell fragment to make sure only one instance a shell script runs How to disable the high priority publish option in SDL Tridion Baden Württemberg Ticket usage Select 2D data in a certain range Why won't curl download this link when a browser

more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed http://whfbam.com/cannot-lock/cannot-lock-the-ref.html Related: an interesting thread, including a contribution by the author of GNU arch. –Gilles Oct 4 '11 at 22:12 add a comment| up vote 6 down vote An easy way is Wiki syntax is allowed: Please fill all the letters into the box to prove you're human. The following code shows this technique: