Building a slide deck, pitch, or presentation? Here are the big takeaways:

Signatories to the accord will not, among other things, "help governments launch cyberattacks against innocent citizens and enterprises."

The accord comes amidst a wave of new attempts by governments to compel tech companies to decrypt communications.

On Tuesday, a group of 34 technology companies signed the "Cybersecurity Tech Accord," a document that declares that the signatories will protect all of their customers from threats and will not "help governments launch cyberattacks against innocent citizens and enterprises from anywhere."

The signatories include Microsoft and Facebook, Dell, VMware, HP and HP Enterprise, Cisco, Avast, CloudFlare, F-Secure, Symantec, Trend Micro, BT, Juniper Networks, and Telefonica, among others. Notably missing from the list of signatories is Google, which is currently facing an internal revolt over their collaboration with the Department of Defense on the use of AI to analyze drone footage. Likewise, Apple and Amazon are also conspicuously missing from the list.

We will oppose cyberattacks on innocent citizens and enterprises from anywhere.

We will help empower users, customers and developers to strengthen cybersecurity protection

We will partner with each other and with like-minded groups to enhance cybersecurity.

According to a report in the New York Times, the accord was spearheaded by Microsoft president and chief legal officer Brad Smith. For years, Smith has been calling for a "digital Geneva Convention" to mirror the rules of engagement in technology, in the same way that the Geneva Convention sets standards for conduct in war.

In a blog post about the accord, Smith stated that "The success of this alliance is not just about signing a pledge, it's about execution. That's why today is just an initial step and tomorrow we start the important work of growing our alliance and take effective action together."

The issue, for Smith, is one of trust—at a roundtable discussion in 2013 about the impact of US government surveillance on technology firms, Smith said "Just as people won't put their money in a bank they won't trust, people won't use an Internet they won't trust."

The timing of the accord is important, as it comes just as new life has been breathed into the odyssey of government agencies around the world demanding backdoors into encryption. A bill in Australia to compel tech companies to introduce a "back door" for encrypted communications is in "advanced stages," according to The Guardian, though it has been delayed since last November. In February, Department of Home Affairs secretary Michael Pezzullo stated that the "back door" characterization is "cartoon-like," and incorrectly asserted the plan would not "undermine legitimate encryption."