The quoran is written by Uthman. One of the biggest ennemies of mohammed (friend of Hakan, friend of Abu Safyan [the Judas Iscariote of Islam], friend of Marwan, he took the two dauthers of Kadhisha's sister that were married to polytheists, ...)
Uthman hated the followers of mohammed and protected the ennemies of mohammed. He was deserteur in all important battles.

I think that the koran is written AGAINST mohammed. Mohammed believed in the Son of God and also his daughter Fatima was catholic.

Uthman uses the power of the authority of mohammed. He tells that mohammed is great only because he wants his power. Uthman says that everyone that doesn't follow mohammed will be killed.
But Uthman says that he is the only authority who really knows mohammeds thinking.

He hates mohammed and uses only the authority of mohammed.

Look also at some hadiths. They HATE mohammed:
- mohammed masturbated
- mohammed abused Aisha against the will of Abu Bakr
- mohammed committed war crimes (400-900 jews by his own hand)
- mohammed used women as sex slaves.
- ...

This are LIES against mohammed!!!
Nobody tells such things about a holy prophet.

They HATED mohammed.
But they said that they would follow him.
They killed everybody how didn't follow.
But they were the only one to know his "true" teaching.

It is true that some ahadith are scandalous. Sunni believe without a doubt they are authentic while Shia reject them only because they show Muhammad as an immoral man. Likewise, the Sunni refuse some ahadith held by Shia because they show Muhammad as an immoral man, among other things that is why some reject ahadith all together for obvious reasons.

No Muhammad was no Catholic nor even knew anything of orthodoxy. He knew Waraqa Ben Nawfal, Mecca's religious leader for too many years, was tutored by him, and ended up marrying Waraqa's cousin Khadija. How did he marry her? a la Islam? no his "mission" hadn't started yet . He married her according to her and her cousin's religion. so he converted to her religion and fact says It was Waraqa who pronounced them husband and wife. Waraqa was probably a Gnostic Judaizer because some of the heretical Christian teachings in the Quran can be traced to this group. Actually it would be difficult to say to which exact heretical Christian sect did Waraqa belong to because heretical sects were not unified in teachings or dogmas. So no he was anything but Catholic.

it is difficult to say which heretical sect he joined since these sects were divided among themselves. The best book i read about this topic in Arabic draws back almost every teaching of Muhammad to Judaizers ,who opposed the apostles and apostolic churches , and who, after many centuries of alienation from orthodoxy, ended up in Arabia and adopted with time different heresies like Gnosticism and were called either Ebionites or Nasara since they were divided in teachings...this is a hint why Muhammad fails to call Christians by the historical title Masihiyyeen in Arabic and called us rather Nasara..by the time Muhammad was born, the Nasara were a heretical Christian sect in Arabia, not orthodox Masihiyyeen of the East or West of all the apostolic chuches.. yet Muhammad lumped orthodox Christians and heretic ones with the same term.

the book i read is a historical one with historical references..you will never understand the Quran more unless you understand where Muhammad was coming from and from where he drew all his teachings...very few Muslims know that the majority of teachings of the Quran regarding Christianity, are traced back to these heretical groups in Arabia, even their rituals..no surprise that Islamic rituals resemble Jewish ones since these people Muhammad adopted from where Jewish-Christians not in communion with any apostolic church in the East or West but were a sect of Arabia.

Evidence?
I know only Holy John Damascene.
Sometimes he says that mohammed was arian, sometimes he says that he was nestorian.

But he thinks, that the qoran is expression of the thinking of mamed (called mohammed).

heretical sects in Arabia were obviously not unified..so one cannot say all Ebionite or all Nestorians believed the same since they were divided. When Muhammad talks about the crucifixion and says that "Christians" are divided about it, was he talking about orthodox apostolic churches? obviously not..the crucifixion of Jesus was never an issue with apostolic Christians but was an issue between Gnostics who were divided as whether it was Jesus' appearance or someone else on the cross! Catholics never ever had such heresies.

Quote:

Another thing:
The qoran reports sayings of mamed, where he says to tolerate jews and "nazareens". No mention of catholics!
(Nazareens don't believe in the Son of God, like ariens).

Muhammad talked good of Nazareens (Nasara- heretics) and at the same time said they will rot in hell (Masihiyyen) that's because he lumped orthodox Christians and heretics with the same name although we have been called Masihiyyeen since the first century. Where is this word in the Quran? nowhere but we find him calling us Nasara who historically became heretics at the time he was born.

you forget about the hadith, the historical documentation of his life and teachings..you will find the same heresies and antCatholic teachings in these works..a Catholic would never utter such heresies or teachings and be called Catholic. Waraqa Ben Nawfal was NO Catholic.

I agree! But mohammed was!
He had a vision of Jesus Christ the Son of God.

I repeat: the Hadiths HATE mohammed

They call him masturbator, child molester, source of war crimes ...

They hate him because he was catholic.
All anticatholic polemics in the hadiths are against mohammed.

Some sayings of the qoran (Mekka) are authentic, other not (Medina).
All violence is the voice of Uthman.
All tolerance is from mohammed.
Mohammed considered Nazareens as heretics, because he was catholic,

Luxenberg says that the islamic translation of the qoran is false concerning the cross:
The qoran says really:
The jews have thought that they had killed Jesus definitively.
But they were wrong, because Jesus has resurrected.

With such severe misunderstandings of even the basics of Christian theology and thought, I'd be suprised if Mohammad even recognized any given sect of Christianity as being different than any other. Most Muslims I have met do not, so I'm willing to bet their prophet did not either, since that's where most of them get their distorted views of Christianity.

Waraqa was his tutor and religious leader..he even married him. Muhammad followed Waraqa, not the other way round..

Quote:

He had a vision of Jesus Christ the Son of God.

where did you read that?

Quote:

I repeat: the Hadiths HATE mohammed

They call him masturbator, child molester, source of war crimes ...

They hate him because he was catholic.

they don't hate him...they say who he is...your theory is historically impossible..true that Muslims admit some hadith are fabrications against Islam, but to say that all are written by ennemies of Islam is historically impossible...what were the "correct" belivers doing? smoking hashish?

Quote:

Mohammed considered Nazareens as heretics, because he was catholic

Muhammad talks good and bad of Nasara because he lumped different people with the same name.

why don't you start by giving some proof? Muhammad saw a vision of the Son of God? where did you even read that? that would be a good start.

O.K. that's a detail that I've introduced as a conjunction.
It is clear that mohammed didn't get a revelation of a book that didn't exist at that time.
This is an invention of Uthman to authorize his qoran.

The question is: What did he really see?

There are many people in those countries that have visions of the Son of God. Why not mohammed?

Why did he change his life?
Why was he so proud that his daughter followed this religion?