Dirt Roads, Dead Ends

Portland has 59 miles of unpaved streets. Guess who promised to fix them.

IMAGE: chrisryanphoto.com

Tags:

Last week, Mayor Sam Adams provided
reporters a peek at his proposed city budget, which is set for a City
Council vote on June 16.

The mayor points with
pride to the city’s sound fiscal health. It’s a note he struck in
February during his State of the City speech, when he said Portland is
“now in better shape than other cities as we move out of the recession.”

And
with Portland’s coffers full, the mayor, who will no doubt launch his
re-election campaign later this year, presented a good-times budget that
doles out sweets to a variety of constituencies.

Adams’
proposed budget would give half a million dollars for college
scholarships, $300,000 to fix high-school sports fields, $100,000 to the
Black Parent Initiative, $100,000 to the Oregon Food Bank and $100,000
for after-school programs.

“We’re able to make
investments in our future today,” Adams said in his State of the City
speech, describing Portland as a city “where all neighborhoods are
complete, connected and beautiful.”

Not according to Laura Young.

PUDDLETOWN: Laura Young stands on a stretch of Northeast 66th Avenue near her house in Cully. The road is one block from Scott K-8 School.

Credits: chrisryanphoto.com

Young lives in Cully,
a neighborhood in Northeast Portland. Her beef? More than 10 percent of
Cully’s streets are unpaved dirt roads. In the morning, she sends her
son off to school along streets that make Portland look more like Port
au Prince. The potholes in Cully’s dirt roads are so appalling,
neighbors have filled them in with piles of bricks, sod and even
firewood.

Portland may pride
itself on livability and transportation, but it has a shameful secret:
59 miles of unpaved dirt and gravel roads. That’s more than three times
as much as in Nashville, Boise, Seattle, Sacramento, Las Vegas, Atlanta,
Denver, Minneapolis, Boston, Austin and San Francisco—combined.

“It’s
definitely Third World,” says Lynn Partin, a lawyer who’s been active
in city politics for years. “I’ve been to Mexico City. I guess that
would be the closest.”

While
close-in neighborhoods sport bioswales and bike boulevards, poorer
quarters like Lents, Powellhurst and Brentwood-Darlington suffer the
worst of Portland’s pothole plague. The loose dirt litters the air and
water, and the rutted streets pose hazardous barriers to kids, the
elderly and the disabled.

“It’s
totally unacceptable,” says state Sen. Rod Monroe (D-East Portland).
“There is just no reason in my mind that these streets should not have
been paved by now.”

It might be
defensible if Portland were short on cash. It might be excusable if
members of the City Council, when they were candidates, hadn’t promised
to pave those streets.

On a Tuesday morning in October 2008,
with the general election just three weeks away, City Council candidates
Amanda Fritz and Charles Lewis visited a retirement home in outer
Southeast to meet the East Portland Chamber of Commerce.

It didn’t take long
for Fritz—who eventually won the race—to bring up unpaved roads. It’s a
perennial talking point when city candidates find themselves east of
Mount Tabor.

Fritz railed about a
recent announcement that City Hall had a $39 million budget surplus.
Some of that money was spent on the arts, social services and even
public tennis programs.

“It’s not a surplus,”
Fritz insisted. “It is money that could have and should have been used
to pave streets; to provide sidewalks to schools so kids can walk there.
What I will do if I’m elected is have a plan for how we’re going to do
that.”

Four years before that, Nick Fish was running for City Council against Adams. On May 10, 2004, The Oregonian quoted Fish saying Portland’s dirt roads were blocking economic development.

Fish lost that race
to Adams, but returned in 2008 to win the seat vacated by Erik Sten.
Fish drew applause that May in an eastside forum for hammering the
city’s plans to build a Burnside-Couch couplet.

“I have serious
reservations about spending $100 million to do a couplet downtown with
Couch Street when we have unpaved streets in East Portland,” Fish told
the crowd.

Sam Adams has also promised to pave streets. When he ran against Fish in 2004, he echoed Fish’s concern about the issue.

After
beating Fish and joining City Council, Adams took over as
transportation commissioner—the politician directly responsible for
overseeing street repairs. One of his first trips out of the office was
to Cully, for a tour of the neighborhood’s battered dirt roads.

Adams promised action.

“I want to address
some of the most-traveled and worst conditions of gravel streets in the
city on a priority basis and then work through the backlog,” Adams
declared, according a June 24, 2005, Portland Tribune article.

So much for promises. Adams’ plan never materialized, and stretches of our city still look more like Appalachia than Cascadia.

True,
the Portland Bureau of Transportation recently paved a stretch of Cully
Boulevard. But all that talk about paving other dirt roads has gone
about as far as a used car bought on 82nd Avenue.

Ten years ago, there
were 70 miles of dirt and gravel streets in Portland. A decade later,
there are still 59. At the current rate, Portland won’t catch up to
modern, paved cities like Denver until the year 2070.

Other
West Coast cities like Seattle launched projects to pave their dirt
roads decades ago. Even tiny Rapid City, S.D., announced this month it
was paving its final 10 miles of dirt road with a program called “Out
of the Dust.” City officials there cited health and environmental
hazards.

Meanwhile,
Portland remains stuck in the mud, and East Portland is especially
cursed with the role of urban hillbilly. The east side is home to more
than two-thirds of the city’s unpaved streets.

Charles Lewis, who
runs the nonprofit Ethos Inc., made unpaved streets a cornerstone of his
2008 campaign against Fritz. He lives on a gravel road in Cully and
provided what became an enduring symbol of the election season, filling
potholes on dirt roads in front of TV news crews.

Lewis still says that leaving some neighborhoods with 19th-century infrastructure is an affront to basic fairness.

“It’s not equitable,
and there should be changes,” he says. “I don’t know what is going to
convince them to change. The funding is there.”

Fritz, who announced last month she’ll run for
re-election, says she hasn’t been able to fulfill her campaign promise
because the city doesn’t have enough cash.

“The recession hit,”
she says. “We’ve been cutting for the past two years. I came into office
wanting to do a great many things, but instead we’ve been deciding
where to cut.”

That’s no longer true. By Adams’ own account, the city is in far better financial shape than the state of Oregon.

After experiencing
rapid expansion during the pre-recession boom years, the city’s
discretionary budget did decline for the past two years, but not by
much—first by 1 percent and then by 4 percent. This year the
discretionary budget surged 5.8 percent.

More
important, instead of paving streets, the city is continuing to finance
programs that may be worthwhile, but are hardly core services.

Anthony Rufolo, an
economist who teaches urban studies at Portland State University, says
social programs and college scholarships fall far outside the
traditional duties of a city government.

“From an economic
perspective, I would argue those are distorted expenditures,” Rufolo
says. “I would disagree with many of the decisions that are made, but
obviously the voters don’t, because they keep re-electing the people who
make those decisions.”

Fritz, who campaigned
as a back-to-basics reformer, counters that in Portland’s unique form
of government she lacks control over the budget for paving streets.

“It’s something that has been of concern to me for decades and something that we need to prioritize,” Fritz still insists.

As for Fish, he says
he kept his campaign promises by voting to use city resources to help
neighbors who pay to pave their streets (see “Put a LID on It,” below).

“I have been pretty
consistent in my view that the dollars should go to basic services and
transportation,” he says. “Where I have influence, I have tried to make a
difference.”

And the $300,000 Fish
requested in Adams’ budget to fix high-school sports fields, which
arguably should be a school-district expense?

“It is wrong to call
that a pet project,” Fish contends, saying it’s part of a plan to
improve parks and recreation in East Portland.

“No one is going to
defend that there are unpaved streets in the city,” Fish says. “There
has been progress, but it’s been slower than we’d like.”

But more than 20 years after Cully was annexed into the city, Young says her neighbors are sick of waiting.

Jefferson Smith, a
Democratic state representative from East Portland, has his own
explanation why eastsiders feel they’re being shafted by City Hall.

“We
don’t have any money. We don’t have any power,” he says. “Portland is a
city that, at its best, operates through the exercise of informal civic power. And almost any way you measure, there’s less informal power the farther east of Tabor you go.”

Top Neighborhoods for Unpaved Roads

SOURCE: Portland Bureau of Transportation

Ultimately, it’s Adams who should answer for the failure
to pave roads, and not just because he sets the budget as mayor. Under
Portland’s commission form of government, he also exercises day-to-day
control of the Transportation Bureau.

Adams says a shortage of funds is partly to blame.

Low gas taxes—which
help fund the Portland Bureau of Transportation—and the recession forced
him to cut the transportation budget down to basic services, he says.

In PBOT’s case, that
meant maintaining major arterials. Under a 2009 City Council resolution,
unless there’s a major safety hazard, repairs to neighborhood streets
have been deferred for the time being.

“I’ve prioritized safety and saving lives over smooth pavement,” Adams says. “It’s a trade-off I made, and I stand by it.”

Adams and other city officials also make a more nuanced argument.

Historically, they
say, the cost of paving roads has been borne by adjacent property
owners—which makes sense, because it adds to their property values. And
since those neighbors paid to have their streets paved, the argument
goes, it’s unfair to ask them to pay for others now. So the neighbors on
dirt roads have to pay for it themselves. Until they do, the city won’t
even fix the potholes.

The policy and the
reasoning behind it are spelled out in plain language on PBOT’s website:
“The City of Portland does not currently share in the cost of
constructing streets or maintaining substandard streets. Since the
beginning of the City’s history, most or all of these costs have been
paid for by adjacent property owners.”

Of course, that’s not the argument Adams made when he toured Cully and promised to work through the backlog.

But there’s a bigger
problem with the city’s policy—it’s based on a total falsehood. That
particular version of city history was thoroughly debunked in a report
provided to Willamette Week by PBOT itself.

In a 2000 report to
City Council about funding for street improvements, an expert panel
delved into the history of Portland infrastructure. They called the
notion that property owners have always borne the cost of paving streets
a “long-standing myth.”

As recently as 2000,
the study found, the city was paying most or all of the costs to pave
many streets, especially in poorer neighborhoods.

“The implication of
this myth was that property owners paid almost entirely for their
street, a proposition that is nowhere near the truth,” the report says.
“It is much more accurate, and also much more relevant to the problems
we face today, to state that property owners have almost always helped
pay for at least a portion of the costs for improving their streets.”

Randy
Leonard, the only city commissioner from east of 82nd Avenue, has never
made an outright promise to pave dirt roads. But he’s never shy about
vowing to look out for the east side.

When asked about
unpaved streets, Leonard—who holds a B.A. in history—launches into a
five-minute lecture about the history of Portland annexation. Multnomah
County and other outlying communities didn’t require property developers
to pave streets, he says, and the newer parts of the city are still
living with the consequences.

Ultimately, Leonard says, the problem is lack of cash.

“The reason we don’t just flat go out and [pave] is because we don’t have the money,” Leonard says.

PBOT estimates it
would cost about $300 million to pave all the city’s dirt and gravel
roads. Where does our street money go instead?

The current
transportation budget includes projects like an improved crossing at
Northeast 12th Avenue over I-84, cycle tracks on North Williams and
Vancouver avenues, and a buffered bike lane on close-in Northeast Glisan
Street. Each is funded entirely with discretionary money.

Greg Jones,
development and capital program manager at PBOT, says elected
politicians set the priorities for his agency’s $250 million budget.

“Of the money we
have, we follow the direction we get,” Jones says. “It is a resource
choice, and ultimately, those resource choices are made by the Council
when they adopt their budget.”

Commissioner Dan
Saltzman, who hails from the West Hills, has never made paving dirt
roads a priority—he says he doesn’t see 59 miles as too many. He’s also
never made it a campaign issue.

“I
try not to make promises I don’t feel I can keep,” Saltzman says. “But
if somebody swears it’s going to be their priority as commissioner—and
the mayor as well—I think it’s within their ability to take leadership
on this and make it happen.”

East Portland boosters say their unpaved streets are an issue of fairness and equity.

“A city the size of
Portland should not have unpaved streets,” says Ken Turner, an East
Portland property developer and community activist. “Because it isn’t a
wealthy neighborhood doesn’t mean it shouldn’t have the common amenities
a city has to offer.”

Adams’ proposed
budget does have a plan for increasing basic fairness. He proposes
setting up an Office of Equity to advance civil rights and achieve
“social sustainability,” in Adams’ words.

The price tag: $525,000.

—News intern Nathan Gilles contributed to this report.

MUDDY WATERS: Neighbors have planted metal spikes in “Lake Carlton” to warn off drivers. The giant puddle in Southeast Carlton Street is home to mallard ducks.

Credits: chrisryanphoto.com

Plugging Lake Carlton

To discover just how unlivable Portland’s dirt roads can
be, you need venture no farther than the Woodstock neighborhood in inner
Southeast.

Kim
and Greg Geist bought their home on the corner of Southeast 45th Avenue
and Carlton Street in September 2009. Neighbors warned them about water
that collected on the unpaved stretch of Carlton beside their house. The
block is just one small piece of the three miles of dirt and gravel
roads in the Woodstock neighborhood.

Come
rainy season, the Geists watched as water washed into the rutted city
street and flooded an area more than two feet deep and 20 feet across—a
body of water that stays around much of the year. Neighbors have dubbed
it “Lake Carlton.”

The lake hosts a pair
of mallard ducks. Neighbor kids have plied its waters in canoes, and
4x4 pickup drivers spin doughnuts through it in the middle of the night.
After an elderly man got his car stuck in the lake and became
hypothermic last winter, the Geists took action.

Without seeking City
Hall’s permission, Greg put down railroad ties to block access to cars
and stuck metal fence posts in the lake to further warn off motorists.

“We decided we’d rather face the city’s wrath than have someone get hurt out there,” Geist says.

In
the end help finally came from a neighborhood coalition. With a $2,000
grant, neighbors hope to fill the lake and perhaps add some decorative
plants.

Portland
State University students last year studied the unpaved streets in
Woodstock. Their report, “Roadway Not Improved,” slammed the city for
its laissez-faire attitude and recommended a series of changes to city
policy and outreach. None has been made.

Surprisingly, the PSU
study found 39 out of 59 Woodstock residents and visitors surveyed said
they don’t want the dirt streets paved. Instead, they see them as part
of the neighborhood’s charm.

But
Woodstock is a relatively prosperous district. So are many of the newly
annexed areas of Southwest Portland, which also have a large number of
unpaved streets. Jack Klinker of the Ashcreek Neighborhood Association
describes an attitude there similar to Woodstock’s: Southwest neighbors
are split on whether dirt roads are rural charm or a royal pain.

WW found no
surveys on unpaved roads outside the Woodstock report. Some neighbors in
Southwest may enjoy their winding dirt lanes, but on the outer east
side, where the city is a flat urban grid and poverty thickens,
neighborhood leaders report widespread frustration.

“We all had to get
hooked up to the sewer system [when we were annexed to the city during
the 1980s.] For me personally, it cost $5,000,” says Kathy Fuerstenau,
head of the Cully Association of Neighbors. “And we still didn’t get the
street improvements.”

Here’s what Portland tells neighbors who want their dirt roads paved: Form a local improvement district.

Under that scenario,
neighbors come to the city and ask to have their street paved. The city
helps with the planning, hires the contractors and oversees the work,
then turns around and charges the neighboring property owners, who have
the option of paying back the money over 20 years.

It’s not a terribly
popular option. In the past decade 16 LIDs have been completed for
street paving, putting asphalt down on about five total miles of
roadway. Half those LIDs were formed by commercial properties or a
developer, and the other half by homeowners.

LIDs
are rare because they’re expensive. The price varies depending on the
terrain and the number of properties involved. The cheapest LID now
under way for street paving costs each property owner about $38,000. The
most expensive is about $216,000 per property owner.

Another problem: In
2009, the City Council ordered PBOT to stop maintaining neighborhood
streets and focus only on arterials, citing a lack of money. A main
selling point for paving a dirt street was that the city would start
maintaining it. Now even that doesn’t happen unless there’s a clear
safety hazard.

Arlene Lux would love
to pave the block of Southeast Carlton Street beside her house on 43rd
Avenue in Woodstock. She currently spends about $100 a year buying
gravel to fill the potholes. She says the city quoted her a price of
$40,000 for her share of the job.

“I don’t have that kind of money,” says Lux, a retired billing clerk who lives on Social Security.

Jack Klinker, a
retired electrical engineer, says he and his neighbors don’t want to pay
the costly city-run LID repairs. So they take matters into their own
hands. They each pay a few thousand dollars to pave patches of their
gravel road in Southwest Portland’s Ashcreek neighborhood.

They don’t bother asking City Hall’s permission.

“If you talk to the
city,” Klinker says, “you’re going to talk to some bureaucrat who’s
going to cover his ass and tell you why you can’t do it.”

WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOOD: Kids make their way down Southeast Cooper Street in the Brentwood-Darlington neighborhood.

Credits: chrisryanphoto.com

We asked our West Coast neighbors, and other cities
around the country that are similar in size to Portland, how many miles
of dirt roads they have.