Live free start with revocation of the Birth Certificate

Revocation of the Birth Certificate

I thought a good place to start would be with the revocation of the Birth Certificate. I think that if more people knew about this information, we as good Americans could take back our country from the criminal corporate Banksters. With the truth and the Laws on our side we as Patriotic American who knowing and following the true laws of the Land! So I give you the key to freedom its knowledge and knowledge is power! Do with it what you must to set yourself free!

*** Attention: By following these instructions you assume all responsibility and liability for your own actions ***

That is to say, corporate personhood is fraud… So is our birth certificate.

How to cancel a birth bond:
1) print out a birth certificate change form; some financial birth bonds have a change form on the back.
2) enter these three field to be changed: State file id number, date of birth, and “name” as per stated on the bond.
3) enter the values as currently indicated
4) leave the change-to values blank
5) find a religious reason for cancelation. Reincarnation is a great reason. The soul is not born when the body is… It existed before and will exist after we pass on. Internet search for a reincarnation quote from a Zen Buddhist/Daoist master and print it out with a statement like “I am canceling my birth certificate because my soul existed before I was born”
6) above your signature write “Without Prejudice UCC 1-308″
7) make a copy for your records
8) send it in to your state location

This terminates the fraud known as the birth bond.

Revocation of Birth Certificate

Certified Mail:

Return receipt requested

Parents name’s Father: Mother:

Street

city,state

Rescission of Contract and Revocation of Power Asservation

We, and , freeborn Christian

Americans by birth, and parents of , born in the county of

, in State USA, on the day

of , in the year of our Messiah nineteen hundred ninety five, subject to the

laws of Nature and Nature’s God, do hereby state the following to be true and correct

to the best of our knowledge and ability:

1. That this document has been prepared, witnessed and filed because the State of

holds the position that there are no statutory provisions to rescind a birth

certificate, nor any trust or contractual obligations derived therefrom, and because there is no

remedy available at law by which we can declare and enforce the right of our child to be free

from State enfranchisement and benefits or losses derived therefrom.

2. That when our child was born, we were under the misconception that we had to secure

a certificate of birth in behalf of our child, and obtained the same.

3. That we were not aware that in common law, births were to be recorded in the family Bible

as lawful documentation, and only deaths were a matter of public record.

4. That we were not aware that any certificates required by statute to be made by officers

may be used as evidence, and therefore they were acquiescing to State requirements which

violate our child’s right to privacy and the 4th Amendment protection under the constitution

for the United States, as the birth certificate is the record of the State, not the Citizen, and the

State may be compelled to produce said record without my permission.

5. That such practices are deceitful misrepresentations by the State and society on the

recording of births, and we were not aware that a birth certificate was unnecessary, nor that

we were possibly waiving some of our child’s rights.

6. That the doctor who delivered our child acted as a licensed agent of the State without

our consent, and offered our child into State trust to be regulated as other State and

corporate interests and property as a result of the offer and acceptance, which comprises

a friction of law under statutory law. (referred to as contracts of adhesion)

7.That from our religious training and convictions we have determined that the right to be

born comes from the Creator (who knew our child before he/she existed) and not the

State, and therefore the original jurisdiction upon our child’s behavior requiring a specific

performance comes from his personal relationship with his/her God and Creator, unless

said performance causes a damage or injury to another natural person.

8. That after studying the birth certificate issue we have come to conclude that the birth

certificate creates a legal estate in itself and acts as a nexus to bring actions against this

natural person as if he were a corporate entity. The State uses the birth certificate to assume

jurisdiction over areas of our child’s life that are in direct conflict with his/her God given,

constitutionally guaranteed, unalienable rights.

9. That such statutory provisions cause a loss or diminution of 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th,

7th, and 9th Amendment rights.

10. That as a result of our studies our ignorance has come to end and we have

reclaimed the Birthright of our child and have declared as Sovereign American Citizens

originating from our Creator, YAHWEH God. Therefore it is necessary that we declare his/her

nexus by the State as a result of the birth certificate and any jurisdiction or other rights that

may have been waived as a result of the birth certificate to be null and void due to deceit, fraud,

and incapacity perpetrated upon us and our child by the State, the third party to the

marriage contract.

11. This notice of revocation is also based upon our rights with respect to constructive fraud

and misrepresentation as established in, but no limit to, the case of Tyler v. Secretary of State,

Pursuant to 28 USC 1746(I) and executed “without the United States ,” I affirm under penalty of

perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct, to the

best of my belief and knowledge. Further This Affiant Saith Not.

We hereby affix our own signature with explicit reservation of ALL our unalienable rights and

without prejudice to any of those rights (U.C.C.1-207).

Father: Mother:

Notary of the public

Okay, lets take this as it needs to be stated. A “Citizen” belongs to the state, whether there is a capital “C” for a common law citizen, or a small “c”, denoting citizenship awarded under the 14th amendment.

A “sovereign” is one with full sovereign power. A “Sovereign Individual”, as defined and recognized by the Supreme Court of the united States of America, is one of the “People” a.k.a the founding fathers or the others that fought and won in the revolutionary war, or their “Prosperity”, any of their progeny, or any common law or 14th amendment citizen, who through the compact of the Constitution of the united States of America LENDS any part of their sovereign power to the government.

An “adhesion contract” is a contract whereby through your acceptance of a benefit, you also LEND or GIVE away another sovereign to those that represent you. When you file for social security, you contract to become a ward of the state, stating you are incompetent to provide for your future needs without it’s interference, and by accepting their matching funds, you contract to pay for that funding with taxes as a corporation.

However, you are never disclosed that fact. So under UCC 1-207 which was renumbered to 308 to confuse the issue, you did not sign that contract “knowingly, willingly and intentionally” which is required for a contract to be binding, as the “meeting of the minds” element cannot be met without full disclosure of all of the elements of the contract, including your self incrimination to being “incompetent” under the 5th Amendment.

This is why an “out” is still maintained in the form of an SS revision form to withdraw as a corporation. Such a withdrawal then removes you from the tax system, as the code (Title 26) self defines it’s authority as binding only to 1. Elected Officials, 2. Government employees, -AND- 3. Officers of a Corporation (Which your application for a SS# creates out of you).

This all boils down to 2 simple issues.

1. NEVER use the term “Sovereign Citizen”, especially in a public venue (such as this very web page.

The term is a legal Oxymoron with no standing, which in court will make you look as incompetent as they claim you to be. Always use the term “Sovereign Individual” as the very term itself was coined by, and is fully recognized by, the SCOTuSOA.

This and puts everyone on notice that you are NOT incompetent.

2. Be ready to educate yourself to defend that position in the Courts. If you can’t explain the position with reason and precedence, dont take the battle on, as you will do more damage that good to the movement itself. Every withdrawee that cannot show WHY his position is correct, even if it is correct, is labeled as a tax protestor and the buffoons of the world start trying to convince the uneducated masses that the withdrawees position is a scam based on rulings against them, even though those rulings do not say the position IS a scam, but only that the “protestor” was unconvincing in their presentment of evidence, and thus was ruled against…

In law, it’s not enough to say the sky is blue”, you have to be able to state with convincing corroborative evidence that what they see is “blue”, that everyone sees the same “blue”, and why they should accept the empirical collective evidence of the “opinions” of everybody else, as “lawfully correct”…

I, John Q. Doe, being natural born in Massachusetts a male human being, now living in Marin County, California Republic, as a Citizen in the California Republic, do hereby make this Special Appearance, by Affidavit, in Propria Persona, proceeding Sui Juris, At Law, in Common Law, with Assistance, Special, neither conferring nor consenting to any foreign jurisdiction, except to the judicial power of California and/or America, and as such I willfully enforce all Constitutional limitations respectively on all government agencies when dealing with them. Wherefore, the undersigned Affiant named herein and above, upon affirmation declares and evidences the following:

I, the undersigned, a natural born free Sovereign Citizen in the California Republic, and thereby in the United States of America, hereby affirm, declare and give notice:

That I am competent to testify to the matters herein; and further,

That I have personal knowledge of my status and of the facts and evidence stated herein; and further,

That all the facts stated herein are not hearsay but true and correct, and admissible as evidence, if not rebutted; and further,

That I, John Q. Doe, am of lawful age and competent; I am a natural born free Sovereign Citizen now living in the California Republic, and thereby in the United States of America, in fact, by right of heritage, a Citizen inhabiting the California Republic, protected by the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, the Organic Act of 1849, the original Constitution of California (1849), the Articles of Confederation (1777), the Constitution for the United States of America (1787) including its Preamble, and the Bill of Rights (1791) including its Preamble; and as such I retain all my fundamental, unalienable rights granted by God in positive law, embodied in the Declaration of Independence of 1776 and binding rights upon myself and my parentage, this day and for all time; and further,

That this document has been prepared, witnessed and filed because the State of Massachusetts holds the position that there are no statutory provisions to rescind a Birth Certificate, nor any trust or contractual obligations derived therefrom, and because there is no other remedy available to me At Law by which I can declare and enforce my right to be free from State enfranchisement and the benefits therefrom; and further,

That, on my birthday, ___ / ___ / ___, I was born in Worcester, Massachusetts to my parents, James F. Doe and Jane M. (Smith) Doe, who were both under the misconception that they were required to secure a Certificate of Birth on my behalf, and they did obtain the same; and further,

That my parents were not aware that, at the Common Law, births were to be recorded in the family Bible, and that only deaths were made a matter of public record; and further,

That my parents were not aware that any certificate required by statute to be made by officers may, as a rule, be introduced into evidence (see Marlowe v. School District, 116 Pac 797) and, therefore, they were acquiescing to State requirements which violate my rights to privacy and the 4th Amendment protections under the Constitution for the United States of America, because the Birth Certificate is the record of the State of Massachusetts, not of the individual, and the State may be compelled to introduce said record without my permission; and further,

That such statutory practices by the State of Massachusetts are deceitful misrepresentations by the State and society, on the recording of births, and my parents were unaware that a Birth Certificate was not necessary, nor were they aware that they were possibly waiving some of my rights, which rights are unalienable rights guaranteed to me by the Constitution for the United States of America; and further,

That the doctor who delivered me acted as a licensed agent of the State of Massachusetts without the consent of either my own parents or myself, and offered me into a State trust to be regulated as other State and corporate interests and property as a result of that offer and acceptance, which comprises a fiction of law under statutory law (called contracts of adhesion, contracts implied by law, constructive contracts, quasi contracts, also referred to as implied consent legislation); and further,

That, from my own spiritual beliefs and training, I have come, and I have determined that the right to be born comes, from God Almighty (who knew me before I existed) — not the State of Massachusetts and not the State of California — and therefore original jurisdiction upon my behavior requiring any specific performance comes from my personal relationship with God Almighty, unless said performance causes demonstrable damage or injury to another natural human being;and further,

That, after studying the Birth Certificate, I have come to the conclusions that the Birth Certificate creates a legal estate in myself, and acts as the nexus to bring actions against this individual as if he were a corporate entity, that the State of Massachusetts, in cooperation with the federal government and its agents and assigns, is maintaining the Birth Certificate so as to assume jurisdiction over many aspects of my life in direct contravention of my unalienable rights and Constitutionally secured rights to be a “Freeman” and to operate at the Common Law; and further,

That such statutory provisions also cause a loss or diminution (depending upon other statutory provisions) of rights guaranteed by the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 9th amendments in the Constitution for the United States of America; and further,

That, as a result of my earnest and diligent studies, my prior ignorance has come to an end, and I have regained my capacity to be an American Freeman; therefore, it is now necessary that I declare any nexus assumed as a result of the Birth Certificate, by the State of Massachusetts or by any of its agents and assigns, including the federal government, and any jurisdictional or other rights that may be waived as a result of said trust/contract with all forms of government,to be null and void from its inception, due to the deceptive duress, fraud, injury, and incapacity perpetrated upon my parents and myself by the State of Massachusetts, the third party to the contract; and further,

That I was neither born nor naturalized in the “United States” as defined in Title 26, United States Codes and, therefore, I am not subject to its foreign jurisdiction. See 26 CFR 1.1-1(b)-(c); and further,

That, with this revocation of contract and the revocation of power, I do hereby claim all of my rights, all of my unalienable rights and all rights guaranteed by the Constitution for the United States of America, At Law, and do hereby declare, to one and all, that I am a free and independent Citizen now inhabiting the California Republic, who is not a creation of, nor subject to any State’s civil law of admiralty, maritime, or equity jurisdictions and, as such, I am only attached to the judicial Power of California and/or the United States of America; and further,

That I affirm, under penalty of perjury, under the Common Law of America, without the “United States” (see 1:8:17 and 4:3:2 in the U.S. Constitution), that the Preamble and Sections 1 thru 16 of this Affidavit, are true and correct and so done in good faith to the best of my knowledge; and further,

That my use of the phrase “WITH EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF ALL MY RIGHTS AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE UCC 1-207 (UCCA 1207)” above my signature on this document indicates: that I explicitly reject any and all benefits of the Uniform Commercial Code, absent a valid commercial agreement which is in force and to which I am a party, and cite its provisions herein only to serve notice upon ALL agencies of government, whether international, national, state, or local, that they, and not I, are subject to, and bound by, all of its provisions, whether cited herein or not; that my explicit reservation of rights has served notice upon ALL agencies of government of the “Remedy” they must provide for me under Article 1, Section 207 of the Uniform Commercial Code, whereby I have explicitly reserved my Common Law right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement, that I have not entered into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally; that my explicit reservation of rights has served notice upon ALL agencies of government that they are ALL limited to proceeding against me only in harmony with the Common Law and that I do not, and will not accept the liability associated with the “compelled” benefit of any unrevealed commercial agreements; and that my valid reservation of rights has preserved all my rights and prevented the loss of any such rights by application of the concepts of waiver or estoppel. And,

John Q. Doe, Citizen/Principal, by Special Appearance, in Propria Persona, proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special, with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights and without prejudice to any of my unalienable rights.

John Q. Doe

c/o general delivery

San Rafael [ZIP code exempt]

CALIFORNIA STATE

California All-Purpose Acknowledgement

CALIFORNIA STATE/REPUBLIC )

)

COUNTY OF MARIN )

On the ______ day of ____________, 199___ Anno Domini, before me personally appeared John Q. Doe, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the Person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in His authorized capacity, and that by His signature on this instrument the Person, or the entity upon behalf of which the Person acted, executed the instrument. Purpose of Notary Public is for identification only, and not for entrance into any foreign jurisdiction.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

_____________________________________

Notary Public

c/o general delivery

San Rafael [ZIP code exempt]

CALIFORNIA STATE

April 3, 1992

Registrar

Department of Public Health

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

c/o general delivery

Boston [ZIP code exempt]

MASSACHUSETTS STATE

RE: NUNC PRO TUNC REVOCATION OF CONTRACT AND REVOCATION OF POWER ASSEVERATION

Dear Registrar:

Your letter to me dated March 23, 1992 acknowledges receipt of my signed and notarized revocation affidavit, referenced above. I am writing this letter in order to address the two statements contained in your letter, and to rebut any presumptions which could or might be conclusively established by allowing your two statements to remain unchallenged.

Statement #1: “This letter is to inform you that there is no provision under Massachusetts law to rescind a properly filed birth certificate.”

Although this statement may, in fact, be technically and generally true, it is irrelevant to the specific issue at hand, for several reasons. First of all, it implies that my original birth certificate, on file in your office, was “properly filed”. You have made this statement contrary to numerous facts which are contained in my revocation affidavit. You have now had ample opportunity to rebut any and all of those facts, and you have not done so. Accordingly, your failure to rebut anyof those facts now renders them all conclusive, permanently for the record. You are now forever barred and estopped from challenging those facts as stated. Therefore, my original birth certificate was not “properly filed” as you incorrectly attempt to imply.

As a member of the Sovereignty by right of birth and hereditary succession, I belong to that group of people by whose authority the Massachusetts State Constitution was created. The Massachusetts State Legislature was created, in turn, by that Constitution. The “Massachusetts law” to which you refer is, in turn, a creation of that Legislature. Regardless of your status prior to becoming a State employee, your current status as a State employee necessarily subjects you to the letter of that “law”. I am not subject either to the letter or to the spirit of that law, however.

Even though you are evidently restricted by law from unilaterally rescinding a birth certificate, I am not subject to any such a restriction. As someone who has explicitly reserved all my unalienable rights without prejudice to any of my unalienable rights, I specifically retain my right to unilaterally revoke and cancel my original birth certificate, for the several reasons stated in my affidavit, and to render it null and void from its inception. The affidavit which I have filed with your office is prima facie evidence that I have, in fact, exercised that right, the exercise of which is entirely within my Sovereign power and authority to do.

Moreover, you are evidently unaware of my prior written correspondence with Governor William F. Weld, in which I documented the fraud to which the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is an “accommodation party” as defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. If you have any need to obtain copies of this correspondence between me and Governor Weld, I recommend that you first contact the Governor’s staff for assistance. Alternatively, Governor Weld’s office has personally informed me that my notice to him, with attachments, has now been forwarded to the offices of Senator Edward M. Kennedy, United States Senate, Washington, District of Columbia. Governor Weld’s office did not challenge or rebut any statement of fact contained in my correspondence to him, except to suggest incorrectly that the issues which I raised were not within his jurisdiction. Senator Kennedy’s office has not responded to me in any way concerning the materials which he received from Governor Weld.

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts is bound by the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code (see MCLA c 106 Section 1-207). The conclusive facts as stated in my revocation affidavit now constitute material proof that my original birth certificate was an unconscionable contract ab initio because, among other reasons, it was lacking in meaningful choice on my part. You have already been notified, and I hereby notify you again, that I have explicitly reserved all my unalienable rights, without prejudice to any of my unalienable rights. This means that I explicitly reject any and all benefits of the Uniform Commercial Code, absent a valid commercial agreement which is in force and to which I am a party, and cite its provisions herein only to serve notice upon all agencies of government, whether international, national, state, or local, that they, and not I, are subject to, and bound by, all of its provisions, whether cited herein or not.

Furthermore, my explicit reservation of rights has served notice upon all agencies of government, including but not limited to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, of the “Remedy” which you must provide for me under Article 1, Section 207 of the Uniform Commercial Code, whereby I have explicitly reserved my Common Law right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement, that I have not entered into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally.

My explicit reservation of rights has served notice upon all agencies of government, including but not limited to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and all of its assignees, that they are all limited to proceeding against me only in harmony with the Common Law and that I do not, and will not accept the liability associated with the “compelled” benefit of any unrevealed commercial agreements (see UCC 3-305(2)(c)). You are under the obligation of good faith imposed at several places in the Uniform Commercial Code (see, e.g., 1-203). My valid reservation of rights has preserved all my rights and prevented the loss of any such rights by application of the concepts of waiver or estoppel.

This statement is clearly incorrect because it is a non sequitor, in light of my responses in this letter to Statement #1, and particularly in light of the conclusive facts as stated in my revocation affidavit. As an unconscionable contract the primary purpose of which was to offer me into a State trust, to be regulated as other State and corporate interests without my full consent of majority, this birth certificate is null and void from its inception, as are any rights of interest which may, now or in the future, be claimed as a result of any conveyance or reconveyance thereof to undisclosed third parties.

Your attempt to assert its validity in the face of contrary evidence is noted and can be used as prima facie evidence of your willingness to violate and otherwise contravene my unalienable rights and my Constitutionally secured rights as a Sovereign Freeman. These rights include, but are not limited to, those which are enumerated in my revocation affidavit.

You are hereby warned that you can and will be held personally liable for any further attempts to violate my fundamental, unalienable rights by acts on your part which attempt to compel my specific performance to any third-party debt or obligation created through the unlawful conveyance, conversion or other instrumentality of an invalid birth certificate. As an employee of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, you are under a legal obligation to recognize that “Constructive fraud as well as actual fraud may be the basis of cancellation of an instrument,” El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Kysar Insurance Co., 605 Pacific 2d 240 (1979). Your ignorance of the law is no excuse in this matter. If you are unsure about your own legal situation in this matter, may I recommend that you contact the State Attorney General’s office for advice and assistance.

For your information, I am not subject to any foreign jurisdiction by reason of any contract or commercial agreement resulting in adhesion thereto across America, nor are millions of other Sovereign Citizens, unless they have provided waivers of rights guaranteed by the Constitution by means of knowingly intelligent acts, such as contracts or commercial agreements with such government(s) “with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences”, as ruled by the U.S. Supreme Court in Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742, 748 (1970). I have given no such waivers, nor is it possible that I could have given such waivers by reason of a birth certificate executed by other parties long before I was even able to speak or write, and long before my age of majority. Therefore, the birth certificate at issue is necessarily null and void, ab initio, notwithstanding any and all unsubstantiated statements by you to the contrary.

If I do not hear from you within ten (10) calendar days of the above date, I will be entitled to the conclusive presumption that this matter is settled. Thank you very much for your consideration.