Try the Health Department. There will likely be a few swingers there getting genital warts removed, or seeing to one of the countless other complications that can occur when people decide to indiscriminately swap fluids with multiple partners.

Or perhaps the courthouse, where spouses that have no concept of the term "commitment" are finding they can't cope so well with "open marriages" and are busy divvying-up their possessions and kids.

Had a great time last night, what with the weather raging all around and the guys and girls having fun. I got up to come to work this morning and I swear I was walking bow legged. But we girls gave as good as we got. It was great! Thanks for the memories guys.

Try the Health Department. There will likely be a few swingers there getting genital warts removed, or seeing to one of the countless other complications that can occur when people decide to indiscriminately swap fluids with multiple partners.Or perhaps the courthouse, where spouses that have no concept of the term "commitment" are finding they can't cope so well with "open marriages" and are busy divvying-up their possessions and kids.Have fun with that.

Or Topix, where people show they have anitquated, uptight, and incorrect ideas about human sexuality.

<quoted text>Or Topix, where people show they have anitquated, uptight, and incorrect ideas about human sexuality.

Yes, Math is antiquated & uptight... but seldom incorrect. When comparing multiple partners versus mutually monogamous marriages, it's a no-brainer: Those who are non-monogamous are statistically more prone to catching any number of lovely VDs & infections, some of which have no cure.

As for commitment, if a couple has no problem venturing outside the marriage for cheap gratification - violating one of the most sacred symbols of their commitment to one another in the process - then they are less likely to hesitate to abandon it all together, if it ever becomes as inconvenient as, say, being faithful to their spouse.

If being more likely to remain disease-free and having a strong, enduring marriage that is "a marriage" by more than title alone are concepts that have become antiquated or uptight, then hey... Guilty as charged. But incorrect? I suppose that depends on the character, values & moral fortitude of who you ask.

<quoted text>Yes, Math is antiquated & uptight... but seldom incorrect. When comparing multiple partners versus mutually monogamous marriages, it's a no-brainer: Those who are non-monogamous are statistically more prone to catching any number of lovely VDs & infections, some of which have no cure.As for commitment, if a couple has no problem venturing outside the marriage for cheap gratification - violating one of the most sacred symbols of their commitment to one another in the process - then they are less likely to hesitate to abandon it all together, if it ever becomes as inconvenient as, say, being faithful to their spouse.If being more likely to remain disease-free and having a strong, enduring marriage that is "a marriage" by more than title alone are concepts that have become antiquated or uptight, then hey... Guilty as charged. But incorrect? I suppose that depends on the character, values & moral fortitude of who you ask.It's whatever, though. "Do as thou wilt," I suppose.

1. We only play safe. Not worried about diseases.2. Again, your babble about how sacred a marriage is is just that, antiquated and uptight. We both knew we enjoyed this type of activity before we got married, we accept that about each other, and it has brought us closer together.3. If you don't want to be a part of it, or if the idea offends you, why the hell do you feel the need to put your two cents into a conversation where you clearly don't belong? Most likely, you are a cristian, and you assholes always find ways of putting yourself into other people's live, and passing judgment.

<quoted text>1. We only play safe. Not worried about diseases.2. Again, your babble about how sacred a marriage is is just that, antiquated and uptight. We both knew we enjoyed this type of activity before we got married, we accept that about each other, and it has brought us closer together.3. If you don't want to be a part of it, or if the idea offends you, why the hell do you feel the need to put your two cents into a conversation where you clearly don't belong? Most likely, you are a cristian, and you assholes always find ways of putting yourself into other people's live, and passing judgment.

Here's s'more math to ponder: My daddy once said that "if a condom was 99% effective, then from hundredth time ya have 'protected' sex on, you're on borrowed time." Don't think he was counting your run-of-the-mill & typically unprotected oral adventures, either.

But hey, if you're not worried about it, and neither are your partners'es'..'es, then hey, tear it up. You'uns can trade diagnoses like collectibles for all I care. Ain't my junk gonna get festered and drippy when the odds catch up to ya.

Here's s'more math to ponder: My daddy once said that "if a condom was 99% effective, then from hundredth time ya have 'protected' sex on, you're on borrowed time." Don't think he was counting your run-of-the-mill & typically unprotected oral adventures, either.But hey, if you're not worried about it, and neither are your partners'es'..'es, then hey, tear it up. You'uns can trade diagnoses like collectibles for all I care. Ain't my junk gonna get festered and drippy when the odds catch up to ya.

Well, I'm glad your daddy was such an expert on human sexuality, prophylactics,etc.You guys can stay afraid of the stories your daddies made up, and the horror stories they told you in 6th grade sex ed, and the flat out lies your churches have told you...The simple matter is safe sex is very safe.Look at it this way, how long have Magic Johnson and his wife been having protected sex, and she is still HIV free?Lets get to the real world here, folks, and quite quaking in our boots with untrue, hyperbolic stories designed to scare you away from having a good time.Literally been doing this for years, and have a perfectly clean bill of health.

<quoted text>Yes, Math is antiquated & uptight... but seldom incorrect. When comparing multiple partners versus mutually monogamous marriages, it's a no-brainer: Those who are non-monogamous are statistically more prone to catching any number of lovely VDs & infections, some of which have no cure.As for commitment, if a couple has no problem venturing outside the marriage for cheap gratification - violating one of the most sacred symbols of their commitment to one another in the process - then they are less likely to hesitate to abandon it all together, if it ever becomes as inconvenient as, say, being faithful to their spouse.If being more likely to remain disease-free and having a strong, enduring marriage that is "a marriage" by more than title alone are concepts that have become antiquated or uptight, then hey... Guilty as charged. But incorrect? I suppose that depends on the character, values & moral fortitude of who you ask.It's whatever, though. "Do as thou wilt," I suppose.

It's called a condom and people in open marriages use them. We also are completely honest about what we do and who we do it with - kinda why they call it an OPEN marriage. Also, not everyone wants "Holy" Matrimony - I'll bet there are several of us who don't even believe in god! ;) Open your mind a little, sweetheart, we're not all like YOU.

<quoted text>Yes, Math is antiquated & uptight... but seldom incorrect. When comparing multiple partners versus mutually monogamous marriages, it's a no-brainer: Those who are non-monogamous are statistically more prone to catching any number of lovely VDs & infections, some of which have no cure.As for commitment, if a couple has no problem venturing outside the marriage for cheap gratification - violating one of the most sacred symbols of their commitment to one another in the process - then they are less likely to hesitate to abandon it all together, if it ever becomes as inconvenient as, say, being faithful to their spouse.If being more likely to remain disease-free and having a strong, enduring marriage that is "a marriage" by more than title alone are concepts that have become antiquated or uptight, then hey... Guilty as charged. But incorrect? I suppose that depends on the character, values & moral fortitude of who you ask.It's whatever, though. "Do as thou wilt," I suppose.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.