Aside from being a project manager who works with staff and project financials? No, I can't. I can only tell you that if you work in engineering and
have government contracts, women and minorities are "must hires" and see a tremendous amount of competition among perspective employers, all trying to
sign them to their companies.

The thing about all this crap is who determines what is "mansplaining"?

There can be no civil discourse with all this BS floating around between the sexes.

It's like the fems want men on the defensive at all times around them.

Check out Stefan's take on it.

7 mins. Language alert! maybe.

Dare I say it? That's mansplaining.

Maybe it worked like that long ago, but it doesn't anymore. We know from brain scans men and woman are not distinguishable. There's so much overlap.
If all we saw were brain scans, we'd not see gender.

The reality is any psychological differences we perceive are mostly social in nature. We learned them. Girls were taught to be girls. Boys were taught
to be boys. Prejudices abound, as a result, since they're deeply ingrained in us from an early age. We're wandering in a fog, blindly attacking unseen
enemies only existing in our psychology..

Make no mistake, in the modern age we've destroyed many of these psychological differences and prejudices. There's no going back because once we taste
freedom we won't let go.

Soon lesbians and homosexuals will be having children. Children will have many-parents and even apps and AI-friends who teach them. Many things are
going to change. And we'll have to change along with it. Why? Because we want freedom and once we have it we won't let go.

Aside from being a project manager who works with staff and project financials? No, I can't. I can only tell you that if you work in engineering and
have government contracts, women and minorities are "must hires" and see a tremendous amount of competition among perspective employers, all trying to
sign them to their companies.

I do find it sad that law has to intervene to force Equality, but it does - - - hopefully, someday that won't be the case.

Both my daughter's get equal pay. One is a producer - so she negotiates hers. The other drives one of those humongous trucks in a gold mine. While
she does get equal pay, the harassment from men was so out of control - - "biggy wigs" had to step in.

Surely this is taking things a little too far? Where does this lead and what good can come of this?

The problem I have is not with calling out
arrogant or condescending men. My problem is that there is now no word in social justice, nor recognition for when women are 'splaining to men. I've
experienced this myself countless times in the work place or classroom, a woman talking down to me or at me as a male, even when they are in the
wrong. Also, mansplaining is now being abused, where instead of it just being about stopping sexist condescension, it's now used frequently by sjws to
shut down a man who merely disagrees with a woman. I hate this bull. This is exactly what is making many people including liberals become alienated by
social justice.

I like it when women wield swords in thongs.. that is the woman I cherish.

I only like women that are truly strong, the ones that fight dragons and demons without flinching.

These feminist women are not real women, they are not even truly human.. they are the very opposite of strong: they make weakness a virtue and if it
weren't for the rest of society they would waste away wallowing in their own self-pity.

They have no drive and no individual animating force within themselves. They are empty husks. Indeed, many have even speculated that feminists may be
nothing but biological robots and that they may not even have souls. Russian and Chinese scientists free from the politically correct stranglehold of
Western academia have studied this exact question for quite some time now.

We await the results with interest and distant optimism. This may be the discovery that will let us diagnose feminists with even further disorders.

At its most fundamental level we are looking at a disorder of the soul here. This is why I always say that feminists are not even truly human.

Still we must treat them with at least the same respect that we would treat our animals. Just because their personality will wither away and never be
born again doesn't mean that we can treat them inhumane. Just because they never had or never will have any chance to develop their character or their
intellect doesn't mean they deserve to be discriminated against.

We must remain true to our morals but still condemn the demonic not only with all of our strength but also with all of our integrity remaining intact.

I wouldn't know. Female licensed professional engineers are paid more than their male counterparts.

Can you prove that?

I'm sure its getting better for women with degrees in trained professions.

Women from my generation simply had no recourse. But, women today do. And they're not gonna keep their mouth's shut.

But, there's still the issue in other type jobs. I mean, how many times has Walmart been sued for gender inequality.

Engineer is kind of a funky field. Especially the technical side.

The thing is an Engineer can be paid 50k differences just based on the company they work for for the exact same Engineer. Companies tend to try to
higher diversely when they're at the top to avoid criticisms and so while it's ironic the field is dominated by men, women do make it to top positions
over men for the exact same 'fields'. These positions would still be equivalent for men that held the job in the company, it's just interesting that
women thrive in the business environment and parts of that poor into the Engineering field itself because of how much competition there is.

If you were to look at less crazy, less technical, more traditional Engineering fields, like architecture, I would actually bet there is still sexism,
between harassment and equal pay, opportunity etc.

First and second wave feminism accomplished great things, and worked hard to empower women.

It's the recent phenomenon of third wave feminism that is the problem. Instead of lifting up and empowering women, it uses a cult like mentality to
push young women down into a state-of-belief in never ending victimhood by using propaganda and blatant distortions of reality.

originally posted by: burgerbuddy
The reality is any psychological differences we perceive are mostly social in nature. We learned them. Girls were taught to be girls. Boys were taught
to be boys. Prejudices abound, as a result, since they're deeply ingrained in us from an early age. We're wandering in a fog, blindly attacking unseen
enemies only existing in our psychology..

Looool. No. There are HUGE differences in natural behavior between boys and girls. I know this for a fact because I've been on unnaturally high
doses of synthetic testosterone before.

Testosterone very noticeably changes the way you think, your ability to think, and your behaviors, interests, and hobbies. It does this within just
2-3 days of being on high doses.

I can't believe what you're writing. It's just so ridiculous that I can't believe that you believe it. I bet you actually don't.

I can only tell you that if you work in engineering and have government contracts, women and minorities are "must hires" and see a tremendous amount
of competition among perspective employers, all trying to sign them to their companies.

If you're anyone that's 'good' minorities are 'must haves'(including Canadians) because most Americans just aren't as good. That's the truth.

I wouldn't know. Female licensed professional engineers are paid more than their male counterparts.

Can you prove that?

I'm sure its getting better for women with degrees in trained professions.

Women from my generation simply had no recourse. But, women today do. And they're not gonna keep their mouth's shut.

But, there's still the issue in other type jobs. I mean, how many times has Walmart been sued for gender inequality.

It's much easier for women than it is for men to get into engineering schools, to get engineering jobs, and to get promoted in engineering. Same
thing for programming.

The field is dominated by men because most women simply don't want to be engineers or programmers. It's very possible that there's an aptitude
component as well; there are many more men with high IQs than there are women with high IQs (also many more retarded men than retarded women). This
isn't a belief. This is a fact.

I can only tell you that if you work in engineering and have government contracts, women and minorities are "must hires" and see a tremendous amount
of competition among perspective employers, all trying to sign them to their companies.

If you're anyone that's 'good' minorities are 'must haves'(including Canadians) because most Americans just aren't as good. That's the truth.

Sorry that your Government contacts sound the opposite.

Next time you visit a corporate HQ, notice that a huge amount of the security guards are African American. They do this because they desperately try
to hire minorities as hard as they can.

Even trying to blatantly discriminate in favor of minorities, there still simply aren't enough even reasonably unqualified applicants. You can be
unqualified trying to find an engineering or programming type job in a large company and still be shoed in for hire if you're a minority. There are
numerous legal advantages for discriminating in favor of minorities.

Since they still can't get enough minority engineers and programmers no matter how hard they try, they have to bump up their minority hire numbers by
filling up expendable positions that anyone off the street can do: security work, HR, etc. Walk into a corporate HQ, especially a government
contractor's HQ, and it's impossible not to notice this.

originally posted by: RedDragon
there are many more men with high IQs than there are women with high IQs (also many more retarded men than retarded women). This isn't a belief.
This is a fact.

Another fact is that they have lass variability, meaning all huge idiots are men. Not simply 'more'.

The conception you're basing this off of is also only 5 points, and also stopped trending in 2012.

It really takes some kind of special to compare 5 IQ points, be it at 155-160 or 95-100.

5 points isn't a measure of standard deviation.. I mean this doesn't actually mean anything. Are you saying that the delta of standard deviations
between men and women is 5 IQ points? What you're saying doesn't make any sense. ??

Of course women have less variability in IQ. That was the entire point.

Even though men's IQs are only ~2 points higher on average, men have a larger standard deviation. That means that more women are clustered around the
average than men. It also means that there are more men at both extremes, low and high.

So, if you're going to look at occupations that trend to include the upper end of the right side of the bell curve, of course men would naturally
outnumber women. You find the same patterns when you look at things correlated with the left end of the bell curve. Notice how many more autistic
men there are than women, for example.

It's just common sense. Women are XX and men are XY. Women have more genetic material than men do. That means that women have a higher chance of
containing a dominant gene for a specific trait. Dominant genes by definition usually cause average expressions of a trait. By definition, the
average is the most expressed version of a trait and the most expressed versions of a trait are by definition dominant..

So, obviously, that extra genetic material usually brings up the IQ of what would have been mentally retarded if they were men and brings down the IQ
of of what would have been a genius if they were men.

I'm specifically referencing that he says they're 'forced' to higher minorities and you say they 'can't get them', however their performance is always
above average.

The framework of how you guys say it almost sounds racist. What's the issue? In our Company the Engineers are Indian and Iranian because America
physics scores are low, and so are graduate rates, and people that live here are idiots.

Like I said before, even the damned Canadians are better hires than America Engineers, and you're trying to convince me the security is black out of
desire for minority hire?

Don't be delusional. They hire black people to do security for the same reason they hire Indians to build software. They're better at it.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.