Rubber Biscuit:ferretman: could of been a much worse tattoo.....can't find the one I'm referencing through GIS....definitely a NSFW search...

/There are some reallllllllllllllllllllllllllllly stupid tattoo's out there...must all be Obama supporters...

It's "could HAVE", not "could OF". And you should capitalize the first word of a sentence- even a sentence like your sentence. And the ellipsis (the criminal fallback of the semi-literate) is a series of three "dots" Link. I don't know why you would think otherwise, unless you spend a lot of time on the conservative group think message boards where semi-literate trolls circle jerk all day instead of pump the gas they're paid to pump.

In addition, you use the grocer's apostrophe in the word "tattoo's". This is a plural reference, so the apostrophe is unnecessary. Just say "tattoos". Your poorly thought attempt to draw out the word "really" is allowable, since clearly drawn rules regarding such colloquialisms are hard to find and often are contradictory.

Finally, your insistence that only Obama supporters would have terrible tattoos is unproven and at best wishful thinking on your part. I would give your entire comment a 1 from a possible 10. You get a rating of one for not urinating on yourself while typing it. While I can't say with any certainty that you didn't urinated on yourself, I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt.

Spanky McStupid:FTA: "Massey leads us to believe that the employee who asked her to leave Legoland was morbidly obese."

What is it with fatties and fairies?

I really really don't understand what the appearance of the employee has to do with the story whatsoever in a million years unless said employee also had a tattoo of questionable taste.

johnnyq:scarmig: johnnyq: scarmig: Parking is easy. Park at the Zaks on the other side and walk through.

But if I did that I'd have to walk through Grapevine Mills.

You forgot to add, "clothes-lining teenagers as I go!"

Ooh, I didn't realize that was an option. Now the trip out there doesn't sound so bad. Of course, it might be hard to do while dragging the kids along. Maybe it can be a family activity: "Son #1, you get down behind that one before daddy throws the clothesline to make sure he goes down. Son #2, you kick him in the balls as you walk by his fallen, twitching body." Ah, the heartwarming possibilities of family togetherness.

/Son #1 does what he's told//Son #2 likes to kick things

How to have an enjoyable Grapevine Mills experience: go up there on a rainy Saturday afternoon just once. Any trip after that will be easy peasy. No matter what happens, you can always say to yourself, "Well it's not as bad as that one rainy Saturday." That's what hell is like. I know it.

Rubber Biscuit:It's "could HAVE", not "could OF". And you should capitalize the first word of a sentence- even a sentence like your sentence. And the ellipsis (the criminal fallback of the semi-literate) is a series of three "dots" Link. I don't know why you would think otherwise, unless you spend a lot of time on the conservative group think message boards where semi-literate trolls circle jerk all day instead of pump the gas they're paid to pump.

In addition, you use the grocer's apostrophe in the word "tattoo's". This is a plural reference, so the apostrophe is unnecessary. Just say "tattoos". Your poorly thought attempt to draw out the word "really" is allowable, since clearly drawn rules regarding such colloquialisms are hard to find and often are contradictory.

Finally, your insistence that only Obama supporters would have terrible tattoos is unproven and at best wishful thinking on your part. I would give your entire comment a 1 from a possible 10. You get a rating of one for not urinating on yourself while typing it. While I can't say with any certainty that you didn't urinated on yourself, I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt.

I think tattoos are beyond retarded. But if you want to get one, hey that's all you.

But if you choose to etch something pointless, stupid, and vulgar with the explicit intent of creating issues with people into your dermis, you have earned your right to get ridiculed and exiled from businesses where that WILL create an issue.

Don't do the crime if all you're going to do is biatch about having to do the time.

A quick Google search seems to indicate that Disney still owns the copyright on Tinkerbell. It would be interesting to see if she got a nice letter from the Big Rat's legal department demanding she remove it?

Di Atribe:Spanky McStupid: FTA: "Massey leads us to believe that the employee who asked her to leave Legoland was morbidly obese."

What is it with fatties and fairies?

I really really don't understand what the appearance of the employee has to do with the story whatsoever in a million years unless said employee also had a tattoo of questionable taste.

johnnyq: scarmig: johnnyq: scarmig: Parking is easy. Park at the Zaks on the other side and walk through.

But if I did that I'd have to walk through Grapevine Mills.

You forgot to add, "clothes-lining teenagers as I go!"

Ooh, I didn't realize that was an option. Now the trip out there doesn't sound so bad. Of course, it might be hard to do while dragging the kids along. Maybe it can be a family activity: "Son #1, you get down behind that one before daddy throws the clothesline to make sure he goes down. Son #2, you kick him in the balls as you walk by his fallen, twitching body." Ah, the heartwarming possibilities of family togetherness.

/Son #1 does what he's told//Son #2 likes to kick things

How to have an enjoyable Grapevine Mills experience: go up there on a rainy Saturday afternoon just once. Any trip after that will be easy peasy. No matter what happens, you can always say to yourself, "Well it's not as bad as that one rainy Saturday." That's what hell is like. I know it.

The most enjoyable experience is to tell the wife, "I need some pants" as she walks out the door to go to Grapevine Mills.

Rubber Biscuit:ferretman: could of been a much worse tattoo.....can't find the one I'm referencing through GIS....definitely a NSFW search...

/There are some reallllllllllllllllllllllllllllly stupid tattoo's out there...must all be Obama supporters...

It's "could HAVE", not "could OF". And you should capitalize the first word of a sentence- even a sentence like your sentence. And the ellipsis (the criminal fallback of the semi-literate) is a series of three "dots" Link. I don't know why you would think otherwise, unless you spend a lot of time on the conservative group think message boards where semi-literate trolls circle jerk all day instead of pump the gas they're paid to pump.

In addition, you use the grocer's apostrophe in the word "tattoo's". This is a plural reference, so the apostrophe is unnecessary. Just say "tattoos". Your poorly thought attempt to draw out the word "really" is allowable, since clearly drawn rules regarding such colloquialisms are hard to find and often are contradictory.

Finally, your insistence that only Obama supporters would have terrible tattoos is unproven and at best wishful thinking on your part. I would give your entire comment a 1 from a possible 10. You get a rating of one for not urinating on yourself while typing it. While I can't say with any certainty that you didn't urinated on yourself, I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt.

a very nice "harsh" reply to an obvious troll. however, i will dock a fraction of a point for the small grammatical flub at the end. :-)

Rubber Biscuit:ferretman: could of been a much worse tattoo.....can't find the one I'm referencing through GIS....definitely a NSFW search...

/There are some reallllllllllllllllllllllllllllly stupid tattoo's out there...must all be Obama supporters...

It's "could HAVE", not "could OF". And you should capitalize the first word of a sentence- even a sentence like your sentence. And the ellipsis (the criminal fallback of the semi-literate) is a series of three "dots" Link. I don't know why you would think otherwise, unless you spend a lot of time on the conservative group think message boards where semi-literate trolls circle jerk all day instead of pump the gas they're paid to pump.

In addition, you use the grocer's apostrophe in the word "tattoo's". This is a plural reference, so the apostrophe is unnecessary. Just say "tattoos". Your poorly thought attempt to draw out the word "really" is allowable, since clearly drawn rules regarding such colloquialisms are hard to find and often are contradictory.

Finally, your insistence that only Obama supporters would have terrible tattoos is unproven and at best wishful thinking on your part. I would give your entire comment a 1 from a possible 10. You get a rating of one for not urinating on yourself while typing it. While I can't say with any certainty that you didn't urinated on yourself, I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt.

Please forgive me. I studied computer science instead of English, so my knowledge of English grammatical conventions is far inferior to yours. I understand most of what you've written, but I'm having trouble with some of your more recherche constructs. What is the technical name for the tense exemplified by the phrase "didn't urinated"?

Jclark666:Rubber Biscuit: ferretman: could of been a much worse tattoo.....can't find the one I'm referencing through GIS....definitely a NSFW search...

/There are some reallllllllllllllllllllllllllllly stupid tattoo's out there...must all be Obama supporters...

It's "could HAVE", not "could OF". And you should capitalize the first word of a sentence- even a sentence like your sentence. And the ellipsis (the criminal fallback of the semi-literate) is a series of three "dots" Link. I don't know why you would think otherwise, unless you spend a lot of time on the conservative group think message boards where semi-literate trolls circle jerk all day instead of pump the gas they're paid to pump.

In addition, you use the grocer's apostrophe in the word "tattoo's". This is a plural reference, so the apostrophe is unnecessary. Just say "tattoos". Your poorly thought attempt to draw out the word "really" is allowable, since clearly drawn rules regarding such colloquialisms are hard to find and often are contradictory.

Finally, your insistence that only Obama supporters would have terrible tattoos is unproven and at best wishful thinking on your part. I would give your entire comment a 1 from a possible 10. You get a rating of one for not urinating on yourself while typing it. While I can't say with any certainty that you didn't urinated on yourself, I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt.

Please forgive me. I studied computer science instead of English, so my knowledge of English grammatical conventions is far inferior to yours. I understand most of what you've written, but I'm having trouble with some of your more recherche constructs. What is the technical name for the tense exemplified by the phrase "didn't urinated"?

I fail to understand how you can think that a place that has a policy against offensive t-shirts would overlook a offensive tattoo.

Yeah, a tattoo is different from a t-shirt, but the whole point is that you can't walk around with offensive material on display in a children's venue. You think that the dirty picture is bad on a t-shirt but OK if it is on your skin?

divgradcurl:Rubber Biscuit: ferretman: could of been a much worse tattoo.....can't find the one I'm referencing through GIS....definitely a NSFW search...

/There are some reallllllllllllllllllllllllllllly stupid tattoo's out there...must all be Obama supporters...

It's "could HAVE", not "could OF". And you should capitalize the first word of a sentence- even a sentence like your sentence. And the ellipsis (the criminal fallback of the semi-literate) is a series of three "dots" Link. I don't know why you would think otherwise, unless you spend a lot of time on the conservative group think message boards where semi-literate trolls circle jerk all day instead of pump the gas they're paid to pump.

In addition, you use the grocer's apostrophe in the word "tattoo's". This is a plural reference, so the apostrophe is unnecessary. Just say "tattoos". Your poorly thought attempt to draw out the word "really" is allowable, since clearly drawn rules regarding such colloquialisms are hard to find and often are contradictory.

Finally, your insistence that only Obama supporters would have terrible tattoos is unproven and at best wishful thinking on your part. I would give your entire comment a 1 from a possible 10. You get a rating of one for not urinating on yourself while typing it. While I can't say with any certainty that you didn't urinated on yourself, I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt.

a very nice "harsh" reply to an obvious troll. however, i will dock a fraction of a point for the small grammatical flub at the end. :-)

Jclark666:Rubber Biscuit: ferretman: could of been a much worse tattoo.....can't find the one I'm referencing through GIS....definitely a NSFW search...

/There are some reallllllllllllllllllllllllllllly stupid tattoo's out there...must all be Obama supporters...

It's "could HAVE", not "could OF". And you should capitalize the first word of a sentence- even a sentence like your sentence. And the ellipsis (the criminal fallback of the semi-literate) is a series of three "dots" Link. I don't know why you would think otherwise, unless you spend a lot of time on the conservative group think message boards where semi-literate trolls circle jerk all day instead of pump the gas they're paid to pump.

In addition, you use the grocer's apostrophe in the word "tattoo's". This is a plural reference, so the apostrophe is unnecessary. Just say "tattoos". Your poorly thought attempt to draw out the word "really" is allowable, since clearly drawn rules regarding such colloquialisms are hard to find and often are contradictory.

Finally, your insistence that only Obama supporters would have terrible tattoos is unproven and at best wishful thinking on your part. I would give your entire comment a 1 from a possible 10. You get a rating of one for not urinating on yourself while typing it. While I can't say with any certainty that you didn't urinated on yourself, I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt.

Please forgive me. I studied computer science instead of English, so my knowledge of English grammatical conventions is far inferior to yours. I understand most of what you've written, but I'm having trouble with some of your more recherche constructs. What is the technical name for the tense exemplified by the phrase "didn't urinated"?

Being a computer genius, you might be familiar with the occasional mistyped character. You might be familiar with human beings making tiny error. You might be familiar with human beings.

ferretman:/There are some reallllllllllllllllllllllllllllly stupid tattoo's out there...must all be Obama supporters...

Agreed. All the Confederate battle flags, "Southern bred/Southern dead" and Leviticus tattoos on the fat, pasty, unwashed morons around me are indisputable hallmarks of the typical Obama supporter. Good call.

sabreWulf07:ferretman: /There are some reallllllllllllllllllllllllllllly stupid tattoo's out there...must all be Obama supporters...

Agreed. All the Confederate battle flags, "Southern bred/Southern dead" and Leviticus tattoos on the fat, pasty, unwashed morons around me are indisputable hallmarks of the typical Obama supporter. Good call.

Has more info, including the statement from Legoland that the mother was offered a free return visit on another date, provided she covered up the tattoo. (NSFW Image of Tinkerbell being blasted from behind by a lightswitch).

cleveoh:A quick Google search seems to indicate that Disney still owns the copyright on Tinkerbell. It would be interesting to see if she got a nice letter from the Big Rat's legal department demanding she remove it?

Rubber Biscuit:Being a computer genius, you might be familiar with the occasional mistyped character. You might be familiar with human beings making tiny error. You might be familiar with human beings.

"Making tiny error" seems to be something you are quite familiar with.

I love how that thread on the site she originally tried to pitty-party has reversed course now that they see the actual tattoo the employees had an issue with. I'm also laughing my ass off about that 'vampyremage' twit who's still trying to defend it and that its cool to have an image of a naked disney cartoon character lancing herself on a lightswitch.

Has more info, including the statement from Legoland that the mother was offered a free return visit on another date, provided she covered up the tattoo. (NSFW Image of Tinkerbell being blasted from behind by a lightswitch).

"I totally thought they were going to ask who my artist was."

Yes, that's TOTALLY what someone's first thought would be to that.

As already stated: woman's an idiot, siding with Lego Land, my soul's died a little more.

Di Atribe:The_Six_Fingered_Man: Yes, lest the precious denizens of the public be offended.

Perhaps we should all just cover up from head to toe, as to not run the risk of offending anyone fragile sensibilities.

Man, there's a lot of gray area between kicking a lady out of Legoland for a tattoo of Tink farking a lightswitch and covering everyone head to toe so no one gets offended. She got that tattoo to be controversial and raise people's hackles. Why else? She got exactly what she wanted: attention.

johnnyq: /Still have to go through the hellish experience of finding parking at Grapevine Mills.

*shudder*

And this little gem from her facebook: "Thank you Amanda, you're an inspirational voice. We will be compensated, believe that! "