EoP MC: Javad Zarif – US Navy

EoP MC response to Javad Zarif: “Breaking: Our Navy operates in —yes, correct— the Persian Gulf, not the Gulf of Mexico. Question is what US Navy doing 7,500 miles from home?”
» IG: 17-05-20_javadzarif-usnavy.

My Secretary of Defence Working Hypothesis Argument is to abolish the War is a Masonic Breeding Slaves and Cannon Fodder Fertility Religion for Human Sacrifice and Profit Racketfounded on Vatican Roman Empire Canon Law slavery [ para 20-50 ] social contract and implement an Ecology of Peace social contract that has a crystal clear metric to determine between Eco-Innocent and Scarcity Combatant:

* EoP supporters: Please provide me with your buck stops here written support and a strategy for implementing an EoP social contract.

* WiP supporters: Please provide me with your argument and evidence that implementing an EoP social contract is flawed and unworkable.

If you had no Generals and Admirals willing to consider the EoP argument and provide you with their buck stops here support; see resignation advice to General Martin Dempsey and Sgt Maj Brian Battaglia.

If you had any Generals and Admirals willing to consider the argument and provide you with their buck stops here support; if any of them gave a fuck about responding to you face to face or in writing; listen to those who disagree. If their argument is persuasive change your mind and continue your support for the Masonic Human Factory Farming War is Peace social contract. If their argument is not persuasive insist that the DoD policy be unanimous either way: EoP supporters honourably and publicly resign informing the public and world of their EoP reasons for resigning; or WiP supporters honourably resign and allow EoP supporters to attempt to implement the EoP social contract policy and see if it can be done.
– EoP ILSC: 11 Feb: PM Bibi Netanyahu: Re: Donald Rumsfeld: Re: Important Global War on Terror metrics question.

EoP v Nobel

The purpose of the EoP private prosecution complaint to the International Criminal Court – if or when filed – shall be to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; that requires all the world’s citizens to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits. The complaint shall charge the breeding and/or consumption scarcity combatants with ‘Crimes of Aggression Acts of War’ for their breeding/consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits; and shall require the respondents to cooperate; to nonviolently de-industrialize and reduce consumption and procreation to ecological carrying capacity limits; through specific actions requested of them. Put simply in terms of ICC Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampos red/green light international law analogy; individuals breeding and/or consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits shall be guilty of procreation/consumption crimes of aggression acts of war; i.e. have crossed the red light.

Nobel Laureates: Unconditional Ecology of Peace co-operation apology for their former participation in ‘crimes of aggression acts of war’ requires respondents to notify the court of their declaration of EoP co-operator status: (a) Individual and/or Organizational Responsible Freedom Oaths; (b) including confirmation that they returned their organizations or families Nobel Medal/s to the WiP Nobel Committee; and/or resigned from WiP Nobel Committee.

EoP v Bilderberg & WEF / MI5: EoP v Business for New EU

EoP Complaint of Scarcity Combatant Terrorism filed with Austrian and Swiss Police, against Bilderberg Group and World Economic Forum members.

Charges: Fraud and National Security Threat

World Economic Forum [WEF] and Bilderberg Group [BBG] meetings are Consumption War Madrassa of Flat Earth Economic Growth capitalist Imam clerics engaged in Corporate Flat Earth Pro-Growth Agenda Conspiracy to Profit from bribing the public to pretend the Earth is flat and resources are infinite; to engage in Scarcity-Conflict Procreation, Consumption and Production behaviours threatening the economic and ecological security of nations and the planet; for the socio-political and corporate benefits of its members and strategic partners.

WEF & BBG Madrassa imams Flat earth GDP/economic growth and energy consumption war propaganda aggravates the Climate Change Scarcity-Conflict Death Spiral on Steroids National Security Threat; by consciously and deliberately ignoring the economic and ecological national security reality that we live on a finite planet with finite resources and that humans procreating and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits results in social conflict which aggravates threats to nations and the planets economic and ecological security.

14 Comments

[…] “I was testifying before a House Committee a few months ago and one of the members was very sceptical of climate change and was arguing with me, because I presented some of the reasons why I thought climate change was a serious problem, and I finally said “Congressman look, set aside climate change, do you realize that seven of the nine things that I’ve suggested will help us be allot more resilient against terrorism or oil cut-offs.” And he said, “Oh if you are doing them for that reason, then its fine.”” — James Woolsey, Former CIA Director; Climate Change and National Security. » SS DEFCON 2: Scarcity – Conflict: Consequences of Civilized Patriarchy’s Control of Reproduction and Consumption: Walking the National Security – Scarcity & Conflict — Talk to Support the Troops: Procreate and Consume below carrying capacity, to enable the avoidance of resource war conflict [PDF] » IG: 17-05-23_javadzarif-donaldrumsfeld. […]

[…] “I was testifying before a House Committee a few months ago and one of the members was very sceptical of climate change and was arguing with me, because I presented some of the reasons why I thought climate change was a serious problem, and I finally said “Congressman look, set aside climate change, do you realize that seven of the nine things that I’ve suggested will help us be allot more resilient against terrorism or oil cut-offs.” And he said, “Oh if you are doing them for that reason, then its fine.”” — James Woolsey, Former CIA Director; Climate Change and National Security. » SS DEFCON 2: Scarcity – Conflict: Consequences of Civilized Patriarchy’s Control of Reproduction and Consumption: Walking the National Security – Scarcity & Conflict — Talk to Support the Troops: Procreate and Consume below carrying capacity, to enable the avoidance of resource war conflict [PDF] » IG: 17-05-20_jameswoolsey-ccnatsec; 17-05-23_javadzarif-donaldrumsfeld. […]

[…] If you had any Generals and Admirals willing to consider the argument and provide you with their buck stops here support; if any of them gave a fuck about responding to you face to face or in writing; listen to those who disagree. If their argument is persuasive change your mind and continue your support for the Masonic Human Factory Farming War is Peace social contract. If their argument is not persuasive insist that the DoD policy be unanimous either way: EoP supporters honourably and publicly resign informing the public and world of their EoP reasons for resigning; or WiP supporters honourably resign and allow EoP supporters to attempt to implement the EoP social contract policy and see if it can be done. – EoP ILSC: 11 Feb: PM Bibi Netanyahu: Re: Donald Rumsfeld: Re: Important Global War on Terror metrics question. » IG: 17-05-23_javadzarif-donaldrumsfeld. […]

Tygae IG Factual v Interpretive Reality Caveat:

No interpretation implied in any Tygae Infographic is stated as a fact. Any interpretation implied of another persons motives could be anything from 001% upto 100% correct or incorrect. Until confirmed; they are only working hypothesis interpretations; NOT FACTS. Reminder: Factual Reality is founded upon FACTS: if overt: what happened, who said what, who did what to whom, how and when. We create the world by noticing who, what, when and how via our senses of sight, sound, smell, taste, and touch. Interpretive Reality is founded upon the INTERPRETATION OF FACTS: if the whom, when, how or what act is not factually unequivocal; because it is partially covert and hidden, then a combination of smaller evidentiary facts combined can enable an interpretation of 'how'; 'when'; 'who' and/or 'what'. Generally speaking when we consider 'why' the observed individual overtly or covertly did or said what and how and when; we enter into subjective interpretive reality. [Excerpt: EoP RH IQO]