Hello Diego,
Saturday, December 30, 2006, 6:05:46 PM, you wrote:
> Maybe there should be a Comprehensible class that's automatically
> mapped to comprehension syntax. It's rather odd to have them only for
> lists. That would be both more general and more elegant than just
> bringing back monad comprehensions.
> Is there any obvious reason why this wouldn't work?
"it will make error messages harder to understand for novices", "it will
make execution slower", "it will make programs more buggy" - standard list
of arguments against making anything in Haskell more polymorphic :)
--
Best regards,
Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin at gmail.com