(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Proposal:
> > 1. replaceId -> id
> > 2. cancel -> close
>
> Is this speced?
>
> It appears that the spec uses replaceId and cancel():
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/notifications/
No this is not agreed upon in the spec yet. It's still under discussion. But I decided to post the patch up anyway to get the EWS results. Anyway, I don't intend on submitting this until there's been discussion and agreement in the WG.

Comment on attachment 130729[details]
WIP #2
> No this is not agreed upon in the spec yet. It's still under discussion. But I decided to post the patch up anyway to get the EWS results. Anyway, I don't intend on submitting this until there's been discussion and agreement in the WG.
OK, let me invalidate r?.

Comment on attachment 130900[details]
Patch
r- due to no consensus on the spec.
You can upload the patch with the "--no-review" option, if you do not intend to have the patch be reviewed. If you want to see the ews-bot results, you can just click "Submit for EWS analysis".