THE KING’S WORDS.

Yemsa is a minor language of Ethiopia, the language of the former kingdom of the people who call themselves Yamma and were absorbed into Ethiopia in 1894; people, kingdom, and language are traditionally called Janjero or Zenjaro, an insulting Amharic term meaning ‘baboon.’ A book by G.W.B. Huntingford, The Galla of Ethiopia: The Kingdoms of Kafa and Janjero, contains the following description (quoted in Andrew Dalby’s Dictionary of Languages, p. 475) of a remarkable feature of the language:

The royal language of Janjero consisted of a special vocabulary for parts of the body, weapons, and verbs of action referring to the king. Thus “eye” in common Janjero is afa, but kema in the royal language; “eat” is ma in common speech, bos in the royal language; and “spear”, ebo in common speech, is me’a in the royal language. The language of respect used special words to describe the ordinary actions of notables: “eat” is ma in common speech, but ta in the language of respect. Improper use of the royal language was punished by death.

A special court vocabulary is an element of a number of East Asian languages (Japanese and Javanese spring to mind); I imagine there are other African examples, but this is the first I’ve come across, and in quite a remote little kingdom. Surely someone must have done a general study of this phenomenon.

Comments

I would be fascinated to know too. I was also interested in Bantu languages (or in fact any African language group) in the context of the Sapir-Whorf debate. I read Stavros’s post about Korean and was trying to think if there was anything similar in Africa, or those parts of it where society is extremely heirarchical.
Sadly I’m absolutely rubbish at all languages. When I was in Cameroon I went to the Fon of Bafut’s palace and saw someone disciplined for directly addressing a high-ranking royal official whom he should have approached through an intercessor. The fine was hefty. In many African societies the divinity of the ruler precludes direct communication. Since the visual symbology and ritual defining the heirarchy is frequently so hugely rich and complex I would be quite surprised if the language was not so too.
But I’m still left with the question, which came first – the cultural chicken or the language egg.

And you can support my book habit without even spending money on me by following my Amazon links to do your shopping (if, of course, you like shopping on Amazon); I get a small percentage of every dollar spent while someone is following my referral links, and every month I get a gift certificate that allows me to buy a few books (or, if someone has bought a big-ticket item, even more). You will not only get your purchases, you will get my blessings and a karmic boost!

Favorite rave review, by Teju Cole:
"Evidence that the internet is not as idiotic as it often looks. This site is called Language Hat and it deals with many issues of a linguistic flavor. It's a beacon of attentiveness and crisp thinking, and an excellent substitute for the daily news."

From "commonbeauty"

(Cole's blog circa 2003)

All comments are copyright their original posters. Only messages signed "languagehat" are property of and attributable to languagehat.com. All other messages and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily state or reflect those of languagehat.com. Languagehat.com does not endorse any potential defamatory opinions of readers, and readers should post opinions regarding third parties at their own risk. Languagehat.com reserves the right to alter or delete any questionable material posted on this site.