This is the first real post to public-vocabs:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2011Sep/0001.html
On Jun 5, 2014 3:00 PM, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I'm not saying that you are saying anything wrong. I was just surprised.
> Does anyone know the actual situation? I was unable to find any
> announcement.
>
> I also note that the Infobox in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schema.org
> lists W3C as an organizer for schema.org. This information was
> introduced by a Wes Turner on 27 May 2013, but there does not appear to be
> any source for the information.
>
> peter
>
> On 06/05/2014 11:42 AM, Phil Barker wrote:
>
>> On 05/06/14 19:07, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>
>>> Is W3C part of the schema.org initiative?
>>>
>>>
>> Sorry, my mistake. It'll be fixed tomorrow.
>>
>> Phil
>>
>> peter
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/05/2014 08:57 AM, Phil Barker wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello all.
>>>> I hope you don't mind me using this list to advertise a briefing paper
>>>> which
>>>> aims to describe schema.org. I also invite comments and discussion on
>>>> how it
>>>> might be improved in future revisions.
>>>>
>>>> As part of our work for Creative Commons on managing the Learning
>>>> Resource
>>>> Metadata Initiative (LRMI), Cetis today publish a new technical
>>>> briefing paper
>>>> “What is schema.org?”.
>>>>
>>>> We often find that when explaining the technology approach of LRMI we
>>>> are
>>>> mostly talking about schema.org, so this briefing, which describes the
>>>> schema.org specification for a technical audience should be of
>>>> interest to
>>>> anyone thinking about implementing or using LRMI in a website or other
>>>> tool.
>>>> It should also be of interest to people who plan to use schema.org for
>>>> describing other types of resource.
>>>>
>>>> You can download the briefing from http://publications.cetis.ac.
>>>> uk/2014/960
>>>>
>>>> Best regards, Phil
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>