Criteria for Archaeology and Heritage Management Under Water

On October 9 1996 the General Assembly in Sofia has ratified the
ICOMOS Charter on the Protection and Management of Underwater
Cultural Heritage. The charter was prepared by the International Committee on the Underwater Cultural
Heritage (ICUCH).

The charter is important for more than one reason. In a very short time technical developments
have opened up the submerged and under water world. Until then traces and remains of human activity
had been let undisturbed. Sea-level changes, continuous interaction between man and nature and
intensive use of water-transport for the distribution of goods, people and ideas have caused an
archaeological record of tremendous wealth to accumulate under water.

As this wealth suddenly becomes accessible this causes major bedazzlement. The importance of
underwater sites is recognized half-heartedly and their value is assessed from limited and often
quite inappropriate criteria. This leads to large-scale treasure-hunting as well as to well-intended
but no less destructive antiquarianism. All over the world the problems seem to be alike. Governments
don't know how to react. They have no tools to distinguish between archaeological research and
unrestrained collection of antiquities and take decisions that have been unthinkable in
land-archaeology for over a century. The ICOMOS Charter tries to fill this gap and to provide the
decision-makers with criteria.

Also, there is a second reason why the Charter is important. Archaeological heritage management is
in strong development. In many countries its growth and related stresses is accompanied by some sort
of liberalization and commercialization of archaeological institutions, firms or companies. In
consequence the archaeological profession is in need of criteria for codes of practice in an
unprecedented way. Internationally The UNESCO Recommendation on International Principles Applicable
to Archaeological Excavations (New Delhi, 5 December 1956), The ICOMOS Charter for the Protection and
Management of the Archaeological Heritage (Lausanne, 1990) and the new ICOMOS Charter on the
Protection and Management of Underwater Cultural Heritage offer a consistent and rather comprehensive
set of codes to which professionals and heritage organizations can commit themselves or on which they
can base their own, more stringent codes of practice.

A third reason why the Charter is important is very international in nature. As ICOMOS, UNESCO is
very concerned about the irresponsible exploitation of cultural heritage in international waters. No
single state can be held responsible in those areas. It is the responsibility of humankind as a
whole, or in a more practical sense, the responsibility of the joint UNESCO Member States. In order
to make Member States agree and in order to prepare an international convention UNESCO was in great
need of a statement from the professional heritage world. The Charter serves that purpose.

End of preface.

The Charter reads as follows:

The ICOMOS Charter on the Protection and Management of
Underwater Cultural Heritage

(ICOMOS = The International Council of Monuments and
Sites)

Sofia, 9 October 1996

Introduction

This Charter is intended to encourage the protection and management
of underwater cultural heritage in inland and inshore waters, in shallow
seas and in the deep oceans. It focuses on the specific attributes and
circumstances of cultural heritage under water and should be understood
as a supplement to the ICOMOS Charter for the Protection and Management
of the Archaeological Heritage, 1990. The 1990 Charter defines the 'archaeological
heritage' as that part of the material heritage in respect of which
archaeological methods provide primary information, comprising all vestiges
of human existence and consisting of places relating to all manifestations
of human activity, abandoned structures, and remains of all kinds, together
with all the portable cultural material associated with them. For the
purposes of this Charter, underwater cultural heritage is understood
to mean the archaeological heritage which is in, or has been removed
from, an underwater environment. It includes submerged sites and structures,
wreck-sites and wreckage and their archaeological and natural context
.

By its very character the underwater cultural heritage is an international
resource. A large part of the underwater cultural heritage is located
in an international setting and derives from international trade and
communication in which ships and their contents are lost at a distance
from their origin or destination.

Archaeology is concerned with environmental conservation; in the language
of resource management, underwater cultural heritage is both finite
and non-renewable. If underwater cultural heritage is to contribute
to our appreciation of the environment in the future, then we have to
take individual and collective responsibility in the present for ensuring
its continued survival.

Archaeology is a public activity; everybody is entitled to draw upon
the past in informing their own lives, and every effort to curtail knowledge
of the past is an infringement of personal autonomy. Underwater cultural
heritage contributes to the formation of identity and can be important
to people's sense of community. If managed sensitively, underwater cultural
heritage can play a positive r˘le in the promotion of recreation and
tourism.

Archaeology is driven by research; it adds to knowledge of the diversity
of human culture through the ages and it provides new and challenging
ideas about life in the past. Such knowledge and ideas contribute to
understanding life today and, thereby, to anticipating future challenges.

Many marine activities, which are themselves beneficial and desirable,
can have unfortunate consequences for underwater cultural heritage if
their effects are not foreseen. Underwater cultural heritage may be
threatened by construction work that alters the shore and seabed or
alters the flow of current, sediment and pollutants. Underwater cultural
heritage may also be threatened by insensitive exploitation of living
and non-living resources. Furthermore, inappropriate forms of access
and the incremental impact of removing 'souvenirs' can have a deleterious
effect. Many of these threats can be removed or substantially reduced
by early consultation with archaeologists and by implementing mitigatory
projects. This Charter is intended to assist in bringing a high standard
of archaeological expertise to bear on such threats to underwater cultural
heritage in a prompt and efficient manner.

Underwater cultural heritage is also threatened by activities that
are wholly undesirable because they are intended to profit few at the
expense of many. Commercial exploitation of underwater cultural heritage
for trade or speculation is fundamentally incompatible with the protection
and management of the heritage. This Charter is intended to ensure that
all investigations are explicit in their aims, methodology and anticipated
results so that the intention of each project is transparent to all.

Article 1 Fundamental Principles

The preservation of underwater cultural heritage in situ should
be considered as a first option.

Public access should be encouraged.

Non- destructive techniques, non-intrusive survey and sampling should
be encouraged in preference to excavation.

Investigation must not adversely impact the underwater cultural heritage
more than is necessary for the mitigatory or research objectives of
the project.

Article 2 Project design

Prior to investigation a project design must be prepared, taking into
account:

the mitigatory or research objectives of the project;

the methodology to be used and the techniques to be employed;

anticipated funding;

the time-table for completing the project;

the composition, qualifications, responsibility and experience of
the investigating team;

material conservation;

site management and maintenance;

arrangements for collaboration with museums and other institutions;

documentation;

health and safety;

report preparation;

deposition of archives, including underwater cultural heritage removed
during investigation;

dissemination, including public participation.

The project design should be revised and amended as necessary.

Investigation must be carried out in accordance with the project design.
The project design should be made available to the archaeological community.

Article 3 Funding

Adequate funds must be assured in advance of investigation to complete
all stages of the project design including conservation, report preparation
and dissemination. The project design should include contingency plans
that will ensure conservation of underwater cultural heritage and supporting
documentation in the event of any interruption in anticipated funding.

Project funding must not require the sale of underwater cultural heritage
or the use of any strategy that will cause underwater cultural heritage
and supporting documentation to be irretrievably dispersed.

Article 4 Time-table

Adequate time must be assured in advance of investigation to complete
all stages of the project design including conservation, report preparation
and dissemination. The project design should include contingency plans
that will ensure conservation of underwater cultural heritage and supporting
documentation in the event of any interruption in anticipated timings.

Article 5 Research objectives, methodology and techniques

Research objectives and the details of the methodology and techniques
to be employed must be set down in the project design. The methodology
should accord with the research objectives of the investigation and
the techniques employed must be as unintrusive as possible.

Post-fieldwork analysis of artefacts and documentation is integral
to all investigation; adequate provision for this analysis must be made
in the project design.

Article 6 Qualifications, responsibility and experience

All persons on the investigating team must be suitably qualified and
experienced for their project roles. They must be fully briefed and
understand the work required.

All intrusive investigations of underwater cultural heritage will only
be undertaken under the direction and control of a named underwater
archaeologist with recognized qualifications and experience appropriate
to the investigation.

Article 7 Preliminary investigation

All intrusive investigations of underwater cultural heritage must be
preceded and informed by a site assessment that evaluates the vulnerability,
significance and potential of the site. The site assessment must encompass
background studies of available historical and archaeological evidence,
the archaeological and environmental characteristics of the site and
the consequences of the intrusion for the long term stability of the
area affected by investigations.

Article 8 Documentation

All investigation must be thoroughly documented in accordance with
current professional standards of archaeological documentation.

Documentation must provide a comprehensive record of the site, which
includes the provenance of underwater cultural heritage moved or removed
in the course of investigation, field notes, plans and drawings, photographs
and records in other media.

Article 9 Material conservation

The material conservation programme must provide for treatment of archaeological
remains during investigation, in transit and in the long term.

Material conservation must be carried out in accordance with current
professional standards.

Article 10 Site management and maintenance

A programme of site management must be prepared, detailing measures
for protecting and managing in situ underwater cultural heritage
in the course of and upon termination of fieldwork. The programme should
include public information, reasonable provision for site stabilization,
monitoring and protection against interference. Public access to in
situ underwater cultural heritage should be promoted, except where
access is incompatible with protection and management.

Article 11 Health and safety

The health and safety of the investigating team and third parties is
paramount. All persons on the investigating team must work according
to a safety policy that satisfies relevant statutory and professional
requirements and is set out in the project design.

Article 12 Reporting

Interim reports should be made available according to a time-table
set out in the project design, and deposited in relevant public records.

Reports should include:

an account of the objectives;

an account of the methodology and techniques employed;

an account of the results achieved;

recommendations concerning future research, site management and
curation of underwater cultural heritage removed during the investigation.

Article 13 Curation

The project archive, which includes underwater cultural heritage removed
during investigation and a copy of all supporting documentation, must
be deposited in an institution that can provide for public access and
permanent curation of the archive. Arrangements for deposition of the
archive should be agreed before investigation commences, and should
be set out in the project design. The archive should be prepared in
accordance with current professional standards.

The scientific integrity of the project archive must be assured; deposition
in a number of institutions must not preclude reassembly to allow further
research. Underwater cultural heritage is not to be traded as items
of commercial value.

Article 14 Dissemination

Public awareness of the results of investigations and the significance
of underwater cultural heritage should be promoted through popular presentation
in a range of media. Access to such presentations by a wide audience
should not be prejudiced by high charges.

Co-operation with local communities and groups is to be encouraged,
as is co-operation with communities and groups that are particularly
associated with the underwater cultural heritage concerned. It is desirable
that investigations proceed with the consent and endorsement of such
communities and groups.

The investigating team will seek to involve communities and interest
groups in investigations to the extent that such involvement is compatible
with protection and management. Where practical, the investigating team
should provide opportunities for the public to develop archaeological
skills through training and education.

Collaboration with museums and other institutions is to be encouraged.
Provision for visits, research and reports by collaborating institutions
should be made in advance of investigation.

A final synthesis of the investigation must be made available as soon
as possible, having regard to the complexity of the research, and deposited
in relevant public records.

Article 15 International co-operation

International co-operation is essential for protection and management
of underwater cultural heritage and should be promoted in the interests
of high standards of investigation and research. International co-operation
should be encouraged in order to make effective use of archaeologists
and other professionals who are specialised in investigations of underwater
cultural heritage. Programmes for exchange of professionals should be
considered as a means of disseminating best practice.