I don’t think it’s that simple. Mistake fares are in many ways less common than they used to be. And those that have still come up weren’t all subject to Department of Transportation requirements in the first place. And yet mistakes happen, and seem to come in waves.

Several key points:

The Department of Transportation has simply said, as an interim measure while they consider whether to revise their rules, they will not enforce the existing requirement for airlines to honor mistake fares. So the DOT approach is itself in flux.

Mistake fares pre-dated the DOT rules and were frequently honored. I flew to Mexico in business class for $55 + tax in 2002. I flew to Italy and Cyprus in business class for $33 + tax in 2006. I even shared an $1100 business class ticket to New Zealand (upgradable to first) in 2007 — to name just a few. This was all before the DOT got involved in mistake fares.

The DOT rules only applied to airfares flying to or from the US. Plenty of mistake fares not involving the US were honored, though certainly not all of them. In fact, mistake fares involving non-US airlines are far more common today than involving US ones and as a result most mistake fares occur outside the US (and thus outside US jurisdiction).

Hotels publish mistake rates all the time, the Department of Transportation has had no jurisdiction. And yet many – though not all – hotel rates get honored. I stayed at the Hilton Tokyo for $3, the Hilton Barbados and Hilton Nassau for $0 (after paying for the first night of my stay), the Le Meridien Khao Lak (in an oceanfront villa) for $33, and many many more… all without DOT involvement.

There’s no reason to believe that mistake fares being honored was uniquely the result of US government requirements. Mistake fares were more common long before recent DOT rules went into place, but that was because the tools airlines had for catching them weren’t as good.

No doubt some mistake fares were honored in the past three years because of DOT rules. But that doesn’t mean that without these rules mistake fares are a thing of the past.

If US airlines stop honoring mistake fares it’s likely to be precisely because the DOT used to require it and now no longer does. The culture around these fares has changed, and in some sense it’s because of the government rules surrounding them.

Airlines used to get bad press not honoring their mistakes.

With the government requiring airlines to honor, a public sense of unfairness developed around these fares — that the airlines weren’t being fairly treated (if you can imagine such a thing in the public mind!) and that consumers behaved badly by booking them.

Airlines can now say they’re “following government rules” for how they are handling the matter. In other words, they blame the government for not honoring the fares just as they were required to honor the fares by the government. Government involvement absolves the airlines from taking responsibility.

In some sense ‘the era of mistake fares’ ended in 2009 when the Airline Tariff Publishing Company instituted tools to help airlines filing international fares detect and avoid mistake fares in the first place. And yet mistake fares still didn’t die.

They were given a new twist by DOT rules, with consumers doing their best to connect in the US even on fares that didn’t originate or terminate in the US, hoping for DOT protections (until the DOT decided that merely connecting in the US wasn’t enough, in the case of Swiss-issued tickets for the Yangon first class mistake fare).

There will still be mistakes, and some will still be honored. Perhaps there will be fewer honored than otherwise as a result of the era these past three years where the government required it followed by the lifting of sanctions for failing to honor.

But none of this suggests we ought to pinpoint the DOT’s refusal to enforce its own rules on mistake fares any longer as when mistake fares died. Long live mistake fares!

More From View from the Wing

Gary Leff is one of the foremost experts in the field of miles, points, and frequent business travel - a topic he has covered since 2002.
Co-founder of frequent flyer community InsideFlyer.com, emcee of the Freddie Awards, and named one of the "World's Top Travel Experts" by Conde' Nast Traveler (2010-Present) Gary has been a guest on most major news media, profiled in several top print publications, and published broadly on the topic of consumer loyalty. More About Gary »

Comments

In the wake of Northwest v. Ginsburg, and DOT’s current choice to abstain from enforcing the rules, what gives you any comfort that airlines will ever honor any contract with passengers if they can possibly claim that there was a mistake?

I don’t see anything in 2015 that suggests that the airlines care about anything other than the instant transactional value of an individual.

You’re right, the DOT rule change did not kill mistake fares all by itself. However, it is one of the final nails in the proverbial coffin. The use of social media, particularly facebook and twitter, have expanded the cost of pricing errors. Moreover, airlines are no longer interested in courting passengers who do not bring significant amounts of business to them (Delta/United anyone?) . I am willing to wager that, going forward, the only time an airline will honor a mistake fare is when social media has not succeeded in multiplying the error by several orders of magnitude (e.g., the recent United mistake fare generated over 15,000 DOT complaints). In other words, the goodwill to be obtained by honoring the mistake will have to exceed the costs. Make no mistake (pun intended), the equation and the times have changed.

About Gary Leff

Gary Leff is one of the foremost experts in the field of miles, points, and frequent business travel -- a topic he has covered since 2002.

Co-founder of frequent flyer community InsideFlyer.com, emcee of the Freddie Awards, and named one of the "World's Top Travel Experts" by Conde' Nast Traveler (2010-Present) Gary has been a guest on most major news media, profiled in several top print publications, and published broadly on the topic of consumer loyalty. More About Gary »

View from the Wing is a project of Miles and Points Consulting, LLC. This site is for entertainment purpose only. The owner of this site is not an investment advisor, financial planner, nor legal or tax professional and articles here are of an opinion and general nature and should not be relied upon for individual circumstances.

Advertiser Disclosure: Many (but not all) of the credit card offers on the site are from banks from which we receive compensation if you are approved. Compensation does not impact the placement of cards in content. Banner advertising, in contrast, is paid for by advertisers (we do not directly control the banner advertising on this blog).

I don't include all US credit card offers available on this site. Instead, I write primarily about cards which earn airline miles, hotel points, and some cash back (or have points that can be converted into the same).

Editorial Note: The opinions, analyses, and evaluations here are mine and not provided by any bank including (but not limited to) American Express, Chase, Citibank, US Bank, Barclaycard or any other company. They have not reviewed, approved or endorsed what I have to say.

Comments made in response to posts are not provided or commissioned nor have they been reviewed, approved, or otherwise endorsed by any bank. It is not the responsibility of any advertiser to ensure that questions are answered.