More Articles

STEUBENVILLE -- An attorney for one of two Ohio high school football players charged with
raping a 16-year-old girl has withdrawn his motion to close the trial.

The attorney didn't explain why today during a hearing in Steubenville. He previously raised
concerns that an open trial could lead to potential witnesses on the defendant's behalf being
intimidated.

The move means there's currently no motion to close the trial, though the girl's attorney
said he'd be willing to make a similar motion.

Meanwhile, attorneys for The Associated Press and other media presented arguments supporting
an open trial to ensure public confidence in the proceedings.

The judge said he'd consider their statements but wouldn't rule Friday.

The athletes are accused of attacking the West Virginia girl after an alcohol-fueled party in
August.

AP's PREVIOUS STORY:

A judge planned to rule on whether the upcoming trial of two high school football players
charged with raping a 16-year-old girl should be open to the public or closed at the request of the
girl, the state attorney general and one defendant.

At issue are concerns about protecting the girl and worries raised by an attorney for
defendant Ma'Lik Richmond that keeping the trial open could lead to potential witnesses on his
behalf being intimidated.

News organizations including The Associated Press have argued that openness is the best way
to ensure public confidence in the proceedings.

Judge Thomas Lipps, a special judge brought in from Hamilton County to oversee the trial, was
set to hold a hearing today to take testimony from both sides, then decide. The judge has already
rejected a request to try the two players separately.

The football players are accused of attacking the girl twice after an alcohol-fueled party in
mid-August in Steubenville in far eastern Ohio. Three other students who witnessed the attack but
weren't charged are expected to testify at next month's trial. The girl attends a different high
school across the river in West Virginia.

The girl and her parents want the trial closed to keep evidence that a judge might rule
inadmissible from becoming public, their attorney argued in a court filing Tuesday. That could
include "harmful" and "legally non-relevant" evidence, said attorney Robert Fitzsimmons.

Keeping the hearing closed will also protect the girl, who has maintained her anonymity
through the proceedings, Fitzsimmons said.

The AP generally doesn't identity people who say they are the victims of sexual assault.

Attorney General Mike DeWine, whose office is prosecuting the case, says it will be difficult
enough for the girl to testify, let alone in a public hearing open to the media.

News organizations arguing to keep the hearing open say the case is already subject to
speculation that it won't be fully investigated and prosecuted because it involves the city's
popular football team. Keeping it open eliminates that speculation, according to arguments by the
AP, ABC, CNN, CBS News, The New York Times and WEWS-TV.

The lawyer for Richmond wants the trial closed out of concern that intense publicity and
social media commentary could lead to witness intimidation. The attorney, Walter Madison, cited
threats he said were made by the hacker-activist group Anonymous to retaliate against people
perceived as helping his client.

The other defendant has asked that the case be delayed and moved but not closed.