I have only seen video on centurioncrew.com. But from what I have seen, it looks exactly like a regular Enzo on the opposite side. There is actually an 09 Enzo 230 in TX for sale with the reverse prop rotation.

Lots. I have 2-1500 custom enzo type sacs. Then I have 150 on the swim deck in a small fat brick. I later put 100#lbs of lead in it. So 250. Then I fill the center ballast tank 250#. Then I fill the surf side bow sac which is 255. Plus some people and the wave is clean and beautiful. A bunch of people have done this mod to their boats now. It's harder to get as much weight in the newer avalanches because centurion moved the engine vents and takes up a bit of the locker space that on my boat is filled with sacs. So assume roughly 2250 or so mostly surf side without people weight. I also have a custom made wakeplate of my design, custom swim deck (doesn't interfere or touch the wave).

You can, but the sac will be a little smaller. So the wave will not be as good.

I think my wave is quite nice The thing that makes duffy's a little nicer IMO, is not the fact that the sacs are a little bigger (you can always add weight), but he cut his swim deck down (which I wont do) and has a custom "mud flap" knocking down some of the spray.

With that said, a stock Avy with custom sacs has one of the nicest waves on both sides on the market. However, the one thing you can not appreciate about an Enzo wave unless you have ridden one is how heavy the wave is. The Enzo I have seen does not really have a taller/longer wave, it is just heavier. Which if you are a bigger guy, makes a big difference.

yes. Not a big deal to me since I am not a big guy. But if you are over 220lbs, it is something to consider. With that said, I have guys riding my wave at 260lbs that have no problems. So I dont want you the Avy wave is soft, it just the Enzo wave does have more push.

We have a range of riders on my boat and all can surf it( I would guess 105-260) I don't expect guys that weight 260 to be getting airs or anything, but they can still rip! Your weight makes a huge difference with how much push the wave gives you.

we have the reverse rotation enzo and somebody else on our lake has the regular enzo. The waves are pretty identical. Usually we only fill the enzo sack plus center and people weight. The wave is good enough for us with this setup. We don't like too much hassle with filling hundreds of fat sacks and having sacks inside the boat. We do have the switchblade also. I think without the switchblade you need more weight. Our regular side needs a lot more weight. With the enzo sack plus 9-10 poeple it is really good though.

what is the difference between the regular enzo and the new enzo plus??

Switch Blade: people either love or hate the switch blade. The SB functions like the Bu wedge (ie drags back of the boat down) but it does not "tuck up out of the way) completely when you are not using it. It impact the way the boat handles and just "hangs" there when towing, etc. The SB has the most impact on the Centurion Falcon. IMO, you dont need the blade on an Enzo. As a side note, you cant even buy the SB from Centurion anymore.

Enzo vs Enzo Plus:
Mainly, the Enzo plus comes comes with a redesigned bow (much bigger) and 1,000lbs pure vert ballast system that fills in 60 sec. In addition, you can add sacs on top of that. The late 2009 and 2010/2011 Enzo also come with PCM engine. In general, the hulls have not changed in a while.

what is the difference between the regular enzo and the new enzo plus??

Lakesurfer is correct on all accounts. You do not need the blade for a good Enzo wave, I use mine because it came with the boat. I do not tow with the blade on because it can do bad things to your expensive actuators.

Mine is a 2007 and I actually like the blade for wakeboarding.(not that I wakeboard much anymore)

Pic is full blade+400#'s of peeps at around 22mph. Even on both sides, no sacs and easy to reproduce.

Just a note if you can't find a reverse enzo from the factory. We interviewed Warrick Bell last year and he mentioned he switched the transmission on his boat, and made it a reverse rotation. He also mentioned it wasn't that difficult or expensive, but probably best to ask him. I would link to his site, but seems to be down.