If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Because I would see he posted and know he was throwing some incomprehensible conspiracy drivel out there. Its like if someone where to put me on ignore. They would be able to see I posted and assume that I was trolling

I don't have a facebook Mac, so I couldn't have bragged about it. Have you been taking your clozaril lately?

You used to. You closed it about a year and a half ago IIRC. I think it was while you were pretending you were a top linebacker and were being recruited by teams such as Texas and Oklahoma (since your coach was a linebacker at OU when they were good).

I am going to pray for you. I'm praying for you to become a believer. I use to have my doubts, and I can tell you now, life is as good as it has ever been, knowing I have someone behind all of my decisions and somewhere much more important than earth to be once I fulfill my life.

If you have any questions, message me, I'm going to be checking up on you every once in a while

Ted Bundy was a notorious serial killer who confessed to murdering over thirty victims, as well as other horrible crimes. Ted Bundy had a philosophy about morality that allowed him to do these horrible things. (Hint: Remove God from the equation.)

In his own words, read his twisted moral observations and answer a few questions afterward:

“Then I learned that all moral judgments are ‘value judgments,’ that all value judgments are subjective [it just depends on how you think about them], and that none can be proved to be either ‘right’ or ‘wrong’…

…I discovered that to become truly free, truly unfettered, I had to become truly uninhibited. And I quickly discovered that the greatest obstacle to my freedom, the greatest block and limitation to it, consists in the insupportable “value judgment that I was bound to respect the rights of others. I asked myself, who were these ‘others?’ Other human beings with human rights? Why is it more wrong to kill a human animal than any other animal, a pig or a sheep or a steer? Is your life more to you than a hog’s life to a hog? Why should I be willing to sacrifice my pleasure more for the one than for the other? Surely, you would not, in this age of scientific enlightenment, declare that God or nature has marked some pleasures as ‘moral’ or ‘good’ and others as ‘immoral’ or ‘bad’?

In any case, let me assure you, my dear young lady, that there is absolutely no comparison between the pleasure I might take in eating ham and the pleasure I anticipate in raping and murdering you. That is the honest conclusion to which my education has led me – after the most conscientious examination of my spontaneous and uninhibited self.”

Because I would see he posted and know he was throwing some incomprehensible conspiracy drivel out there. Its like if someone where to put me on ignore. They would be able to see I posted and assume that I was trolling

And that really bothers you? I'm going to give you the best advice you'll ever need.

Ted Bundy was a notorious serial killer who confessed to murdering over thirty victims, as well as other horrible crimes. Ted Bundy had a philosophy about morality that allowed him to do these horrible things. (Hint: Remove God from the equation.)

In his own words, read his twisted moral observations and answer a few questions afterward:

“Then I learned that all moral judgments are ‘value judgments,’ that all value judgments are subjective [it just depends on how you think about them], and that none can be proved to be either ‘right’ or ‘wrong’…

…I discovered that to become truly free, truly unfettered, I had to become truly uninhibited. And I quickly discovered that the greatest obstacle to my freedom, the greatest block and limitation to it, consists in the insupportable “value judgment that I was bound to respect the rights of others. I asked myself, who were these ‘others?’ Other human beings with human rights? Why is it more wrong to kill a human animal than any other animal, a pig or a sheep or a steer? Is your life more to you than a hog’s life to a hog? Why should I be willing to sacrifice my pleasure more for the one than for the other? Surely, you would not, in this age of scientific enlightenment, declare that God or nature has marked some pleasures as ‘moral’ or ‘good’ and others as ‘immoral’ or ‘bad’?

In any case, let me assure you, my dear young lady, that there is absolutely no comparison between the pleasure I might take in eating ham and the pleasure I anticipate in raping and murdering you. That is the honest conclusion to which my education has led me – after the most conscientious examination of my spontaneous and uninhibited self.”

Atheist friend, what is your answer to this question:

On what moral grounds can you provide a response to Bundy?

Using serial killers to make your argument might say more about you than you realize. But sure, why not?

Morality is pretty simple, really. If it is going to do harm to others, lessen their life in some way, then it's probably immoral. There are shades of grey in there of course, but it's not as if you're reading any of this with any real attention to what I'm saying anyway, so why go into that when, instead, I could just randomly put the word banana in here. Banana. Anyway, killing people, I'm pretty sure, does not increase the quality of their life in any way, so it seems pretty safe to put that in the immoral category. There is, however, one thing we can be sure of: Jeffrey Dahmer killed and dismember and ate a bunch of people, not because he was a sociopath, but because he believed in evolution.

"There's no better public education than teaching kids that they should have been born to a parent who could afford their cancer treatments." - @LOLGOP

Using serial killers to make your argument might say more about you than you realize. But sure, why not?

Morality is pretty simple, really. If it is going to do harm to others, lessen their life in some way, then it's probably immoral. There are shades of grey in there of course, but it's not as if you're reading any of this with any real attention to what I'm saying anyway, so why go into that when, instead, I could just randomly put the word banana in here. Banana. Anyway, killing people, I'm pretty sure, does not increase the quality of their life in any way, so it seems pretty safe to put that in the immoral category. There is, however, one thing we can be sure of: Jeffrey Dahmer killed and dismember and ate a bunch of people, not because he was a sociopath, but because he believed in evolution.

So what do you believe, where did we come from, a big bang? Which is actually quite possible, except there was a banger that initiated the bang. The universe have been expanding ever since the beginning of time.

And why is " morally wrong to kill? What if I like to eat human flesh like say a lion in Africa likes to hunt antelope for his meal. Why can't I hunt human flesh for my meal? Why is human life any more significant than the antelopes life? We as animals are all going to perish, why is the human life I want to hunt and eat in this example anymore valuable than the antelopes life? Who made up this entity of morality? Who's concept or idea is this which we call morality? Please do tell.