Lawsuit: Apple shortchanges store workers

by michael liedtke
the associated press

Published: July 31, 2013;Last modified: July 31, 2013 11:47PM

SAN FRANCISCO — Apple is facing accusations of shortchanging thousands of employees who haven’t been getting paid while being forced to wait in line to show they aren’t trying to steal an iPhone, iPad or other merchandise from the company’s bustling stores.

The complaint filed July 25 in a San Francisco federal court threatens to increase public scrutiny of how Apple Inc. treats the lower-paid contractors and employees who make and sell the products that have enriched the Cupertino, Calif., company.

Much of the attention has focused on whether Apple has done enough to protect the rights of workers assembling its devices in China and in other overseas factories.

But some of the former workers in Apple’s often-packed stores also have complained about being underpaid and overworked.

Those grievances could gather more momentum if the lawsuit filed by two former Apple store employees, Amanda Frlekin and Dean Pelle, is certified as a class-action.

The complaint seeks to represent Apple employees who have worked in the company’s U.S. stores within the past three years. Lawyers handling the lawsuit also are looking to expand the complaint to represent Apple employees in the company’s California and New York stores for even longer periods because of differences in those two states’ laws.

The case hinges on accusations that Apple requires store workers who are paid by the hour to submit to searches of their bags and other personal belongings as an anti-theft measure before they are allowed to leave the premises. The lawsuit alleges the store employees routinely must wait their turn to be searched even though they aren’t being paid for the additional time.

The lawsuit estimates the unpaid detention periods routinely spanned a total of 15 minutes to a half hour per shift, based on the experiences of Frlekin and Pelle. If the employees had been properly paid while waiting to be searched, they would have earned an additional $1,400 to $1,500 annually, the lawsuit estimates.