Take action for Liberty each and every day.
Support an open press. Teknosis' continued operation and existence crucially depends on your informative contributions, donation or paying forward, partnering with or purchase of items advertised here. Thank you.

If you missed the Conference Call I
did recently via Freedom Force
International which connects the dots between Codex,The
North American Union, The FDA's Trilateral Coopertion Charter, the
NAFTA Superhighway, the CIA's MKULTRA Mind Control Program and related
info please listen to the MP3 file
here:http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/audio/Hammell_Codex.mp3

It encourages me greatly that
I've had such enthusiastic
feedback on this conference call! The MP3 file from it has
been very widely forwarded, and I've been getting a lot of email and
phone calls from new people who want to help IAHF in all kinds of ways,
and this inspires me and helps me sleep better- so
THANKS to those of you who've been
forwarding the info!

We've had a surge of recent
signatures on the Petition calling for
congressional oversight on FDA's Trilateral Cooperation Charter:and
we've passed the 9,200 mark- so please help
keep the pressure on by forwarding this widely! http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/373269232#body

A SOBERING PRE
EASTER MESSAGE: THE RUSSIANS HAVE SCOOPED THE PENTAGON'S PLAN TO
ATTACK IRAN ON APRIL 6th

Friends- I've told you all many
times that I'm neither a Republican nor a Democrat, the truth is, I
just don't trust either Party, but having said that, I believe deeply
in this place called America, and I don't want to see it be wiped off
the face of the earth, either by the planned North American Union, or via
a Nuclear Holocaust and right now..... either or both things are all too
possible. Eisenhower's warning about
the Military Industrial Complex Running Amok is sounding in my memory
banks like a GONG right now: http://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/indust.html

It wouldn't surprise me at all
if the ruling elite had another 911 type event planned to grease the skids
for an attack on IRAN, so go
HERE to TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE WAR ON IRAN THAT OUR LATTER
DAY HITLER IS TRYING TO GET US INTOhttp://www.millionphonemarch.com/webb_iran_amendment.php

MY TWO CENTS WORTH
ON WHATS GOIN' DOWN...

I'll never forget First Grade
at Washington Elementary School in Summit, New Jersey. Our teacher had us
do drills that scared the hell out of us all in which we had to go
underneath our desks in case nuclear missiles started raining down on us.
The year was 1963, and the Cold War with the Russians was in full swing.
The Cuban Missile Crisis had just occurred, and we still had a Civil
Defense system in those days complete with Air Raid Sirens that were
tested regularly. The newspapers were full of chatter about the arms race
with the Russians.

Our family had a bomb shelter in
the basement of our house because my dad was the world's foremost
expert on the internal guidance systems of Inter Continental Ballistic
Missiles as a defense contractor at Bell Telephone Labs and as a
Captain in Naval Intelligence, a position we never knew he held til after
he flipped out, landed in a loonie bin, and was stripped of his top
security clearance upon getting out. He told us he'd had a wrestling
match with his conscience and that it was preying on his mind that
he'd been involved with the development of weapons of mass
destruction. He felt relieved about being stripped of his top security
clearance and about being removed from Naval Intelligence. I wish everyone
who is a cog inside the Military Industrial Complex could have the sort of
highly developed conscience that my father had and would just flip the
BIRD to these people!

He hated and distrusted
the CIA. Never liked interracting with them. He used to tell
me they weren't part of our government, that they take their marching
orders from the Royal Institute of
International Affairs, aka Chatham House, the same
folks who give British Intelligence their marching orders. Dad's
instincts were solid. He realized on some deep internal level that he was
being used by the pondscum who are trying to turn this into a prison
planet, and if he were alive today, he'd want to personally destroy
traitors Bush & Cheney who he would accurately see are collectivists
posing as purveyers of "freedom".

IAHF TO SPEAK IN
TORONTO CANADA IN APRIL

I'll be speaking on a panel on Health
Freedom issues alongside allies Rob Verkerk and Scott Tips at the Total
Health Show in Toronto, Ontario Canada April 13-15 http://www.consumerhealth.org/tothealth/

DIALOGUE REGARDING A MARCH
ON WASHINGTON PLANNED FOR MID JUNE

IAHF is engaged in a dialogue with
"Let Freedom Ring America", an anti immigration group that has
organized a march on Washington to occur in June: http://www.lframerica.com/march2.html
Although I appreciate what this group is trying to do, I have been
expressing some concerns about the way they're going about things.
We're going to be holding a conference call to discuss this sometime
in the coming week, so stay tuned! My concern is that they're not
making an effort to build a BROAD BASED- BIPARTISAN COALITION, and their
sole means of challenging the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North
America is via the immigration issue.

My concern is that they're out
of touch with our political reality which is that the Democrats on the
Oversight & Investigations Subcommittee have received failing grades
from Americans for Better Immigration, (an anti open borders group), so
I'm concerned that they could totally alienate the oversight
subcommittee, which would then make it much harder for us to get oversight
on FDA's Trilateral Cooperation Charter....

I've been trying hard to explain
to this group that the threat of the North American Union must be seen from
many different angles in order to strategically dismantle it, but this
group is unfortunately not seeing the whole chessboard and thus far feels
far too comfortable about DISENFRANCHISING the huge number of Americans
who pushed DSHEA through congress in '94 in what was the largest flood
of letters ever sent to Congress on a single issue in the HISTORY of
congress. If any of you would like to assist me in communicating with
"Let Freedom Ring America" please let me know!

Thus far, they've been
drivin' me right up a wall with the worst form of arrogance I've
ever encountered, so I'm callin' on ya'll as reinforcements!
Want to help? Send an email at jham@iahf.com and in the subject line put:
"I'm a Communicator and I Want to Help With the March on
Washington" If you can believe it, these people have threatened
to have me arrested by the Washington Capital Police if I come anywhere
near their march..... Thats not a smart way for anyone to talk to me-
I've got the biggest bullhorn money can buy and lotsa
batteries......

If you appreciate this work I'm
doin' here- and want to help me get to Toronto for the Total Health
Show and to DC to Interface with these people's March since they
clearly need settin' straight- kindly slide a few simolians in this
direction, eh?

IAHF 556 Boundary Bay Rd.

Point Roberts WA 98281
USA

or via Paypal at http://www.iahf.com/index1.html
and let me know if you want a book + DVD- to those who've sent
donations and are waitin' on books, they're coming up, I'm
putting a bunch into tomorrow's mail, so please hang in there with me
I'm tryin' to do the work of about 10 people here and am busier
than a one armed paperhanger whose just had a beeehive be smashed over his
head!

FINALLY, the federal income tax is officially dead. =============================================

HERE IT IS FURTHER EXPLAINED IN LAYMAN'S TERMS

What is the significance of all of this in regards to the IRS??? I'm not sure what is going on, but it sounds pretty big what is happening in regards to these people not answering you.I have some other communication about a Chuck Conces who is having some troubles and wonder if this might be of import to what is happening to him.

Yes: this news is significant for all 300 million Americans, particularly as the annual April 15 tax deadline approaches.

There is no liability STATUTE for taxes imposed by subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code: IRS tried to create that liability with regulations instead, but it's not legal for IRS to do that:

EVEN IF IRS were a de jure service or bureau within the U.S. Department of the Treasury (which they are not), they would STILL not have any authority to create a tax liability by means of regulations published in the Federal Register.

So, in point of fact, IRS has been impersonating the Congress and impersonating the U.S. Department of the Treasury. These are violations of 18 USC 912 and 31 USC 333, respectively:

And, since Treasury fell silent in response to a proper SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE, they were legally estopped the moment we filed a NOTICE OF DEFAULT, BY AFFIDAVIT at the Tenth Circuit today. Service of LEGAL MAIL is effected on the day it's posted.

"Estoppel" basically means that they cannot come forward any longer, because they had their chance, for several years, and they couldn't produce a STATUTE.

So, now it's O-V-E-R for them.

EVEN IF they produced a liability STATUTE tomorrow, that STATUTE (which doesn't exist, by the way) can be stricken from evidence at the Tenth Circuit on the basis of legal estoppel. In simple language, they cannot change their minds to the detriment of their opposing party(s):

For the rest of the story, study up on the topic of "estoppel" in any good law dictionary e.g. "equitable estoppel" and "collateral estoppel". Not only is the U.S. Department of the Treasury legally estopped.

U.S. DOJ attempted to appear on behalf of a Delaware corporation which has been revoked. Therefore, the U.S. Department of Justice is also legally estopped from enforcing IRC subtitle A and from attempting to rebut the AFFIDAVIT above, because the Relator in that appeal preempted DOJ the moment Relator appeared on behalf of the United States ex rel:

It is now the official position of the United States (federal government) that there is no federal Statute at Large which creates a specific liability for income taxes imposed by subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code. For standing high Court authority, see Commissioner v. Acker:

EVEN IF IRS were a de jure service or bureau within the U.S. Department of the Treasury (which they are not), they would STILL not have any authority to create a tax liability by means of regulations published in the Federal Register.

So, in point of fact, IRS has been impersonating the Congress and impersonating the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

And, since Treasury fell silent in response to a proper SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE, they were
legally estopped the moment we filed a NOTICE OF DEFAULT, BY AFFIDAVIT at the Tenth Circuit today. Service of LEGAL MAIL is effected on the day it's posted.

"Estoppel" basically means that they cannot come forward any longer, because they had their chance, for several years, and they couldn't produce a STATUTE.

So, now it's O-V-E-R for them.

EVEN IF they produced a liability STATUTE tomorrow, that STATUTE (which doesn't exist, by the way) can be stricken from evidence at the Tenth Circuit on the basis of legal estoppel. In simple language, they cannot change their minds to the detriment of their opposing party(s):

‘The masses must… be brought to accept such a thing as Income Tax, a
Marxist principle smoothly slid into [the] capitalist framework in 1909
in the United States. This, even though the Basic Law [i.e., the
Constitution – Ed.] of the United States forbade it and even though
Communism had at that time been active only for a few years in America’.

‘The Communist agent skilled in economics has as his task the suborning
of tax agencies and their personnel to create the maximum disturbance
and chaos’.

From: 'The Communist Manual of Instructions on Psychopolitical Warfare’
exposed by Kenneth Goff, a.k.a. John Keats, a former active and
dues-paying Wisconsin (CPUSA) Communist; Volume 9 of the Congressional
Record, 1939. Note: Nazism (National Socialism) and Communism
(International Socialism) are dialectical ‘opposites’ with a documented
common origin that are manipulated for World Revolution and global
hegemony purposes. For backgound, see: Soviet Analyst, Volume 30, 1-3 and other intelligence sources published recently by World Reports Limited.

WANTA BETRAYED BY ENVIOUS, JEALOUS AND CORRUPT COLLEAGUES
One of the most unpleasant characteristics of intelligence communities
is their ingrained habit of treating their own operatives worse than
the agent enemies with which they often cooperate.

At any stage of his career, an intelligence operative may find himself
betrayed by his own supposed colleagues, for one of two reasons: either
because he has ‘messed up’, or else because he has been too successful,
and professional jealousy and rivalry have taken over.

That, in a nutshell, is what happened to the United States’ greatest
living Financial Warfare genius and patriot, Leo Emil Wanta. Following
the spectacular Financial Warfare operation, which he masterminded, to
destabilise the Soviet Union, in cooperation with Mikhail Gorbachev,
Boris Yeltsin, Prime Minister Yegor Gaidar and Vladimir Vladimirovoch
Putin – all of whom (with others) accepted what are politely known in
the trade as ‘facilitation payments’, ensuring the ‘success’ of the
‘takedown’ – Leo Wanta, in his turn, became the victim of a vicious
‘takedown’, or the ‘switch’ component of a ‘bait and switch’ operation,
himself.

U.S. INTELLIGENCE HELPED WITH SOVIET ‘COLLAPSIBLE COMMUNISM’
Before we examine how this was achieved, and what followed, two crucial
observations are inserted here. First, the Soviets had formulated and
perfected a complex scheme which the Editor calls ‘collapsible
Communism’, and which was precisely outlined and predicted by Anatoliy
Golitsyn in his two classic exposures of Soviet deception strategy,
‘New Lies for Old’ and ‘The Perestroika Deception’
(edited by this Editor: see the Edward Harle (books) section of this
website). Either knowingly or otherwise, US intelligence actually
assisted the Soviets with the implementation of this long-range
strategic deception operation.

THE ‘BAIT AND SWITCH’ TECHNIQUE
Secondly, the most basic (and odious) of all standard intelligence
techniques is known as the ‘bait and switch’ technique, which is
self-explanatory. You gain the confidence of your target, entrap him,
through greed, blackmail or the application of any of the ‘Black Arts’,
and when he is well and truly cooked, you turn on him, strip him of his
assets, and destroy him. Prime examples: Saddam Hussein and Slobodan
Milosevic. It stinks, but that’s what many of these people do.

Leo Wanta duly became the victim of the ‘switch’ end of this standard
intelligence operating technique. And just as Gorbachev, Putin et al
had cooperated with him to facilitate (for their own strategic reasons)
their ‘collapsible Communism’ ruse, the fake ‘post’-Soviets now
collaborated with high-level US operatives to ‘take down’ Ambassador
Leo Wanta.

The primary characters involved in this ‘switch’ operation against
Wanta were Marc Rich/Reich (the fugitive from US justice resident in
Switzerland subsequently exposed by the Editor as the DVD operative
Hans Brand (1)), Boris Yeltsin, William Jefferson and Hillary Clinton,
George Bush Sr., and Tommy Thompson, the former Governor of Wisconsin.

DARK MOTIVES FOR THE ‘SWITCH’ AGAINST LEO WANTA
Each of these operatives had their own dark motives for collaborating
in this cynical venture, the primary outcome of which was to facilitate
unlawful access to global monetary funds aggregating $27.5 trillion (2)
of which Leo Wanta was and remains the sole Principal and Trustor.

These funds were and remain lodged with numerous bank accounts held by
USG Title 18, Section 6 corporations of which Leo Wanta is the sole
owner. Under President Reagan’s Executive Order 12333 (January 1981),
US intelligence operatives were given freedom to establish
corporations, which they could own, for the purposes of conducting
secret intelligence and counterintelligence business on behalf of Uncle
Sam under contract. The way such corporations are organised means that
the operative who sets them up OWNS the assets that they hold in the
associated bank accounts. Leo Emil Wanta reported annually on the
assets of his Title 18, Section 6 corporations to the General
Accounting (now ‘Accountability’) Office in Washington DC, and stood
ready at all times to pay the necessary tax on those assets when
repatriated, in conformity with US tax legislation.

This is not the place to debate the wisdom of such an arrangement.
However the Editor permits himself the observation that to allow one’s
intelligence agents such freedom is asking for trouble: and trouble, in
spades, is what the United States has got as a longer-term consequence
of this device – which, by the way, was copied by the Gorbachev-era
Politburo in 1990, when it passed a resolution authorising (under
Soviet ‘socialist legality’) the rapid setting up of similar
intelligence corporations clearly modelled on the US precedent
(although the Soviets had in fact been using intelligence corporations,
disguised as trading organisations, ever since the establishment of
Amtorg in New York back in the 1920s).

NO USE IF INTELLIGENCE OPERATIVES CAN’T BE TRUSTED
Executive Order 12333 was all very well if the President of the United
States could ever trust his operatives. But President Reagan trusted
none of them, with one exception: Leo Emil Wanta, whom he called his
‘junkyard dog’. And Reagan trusted Leo Emil Wanta for the impeccable
reason that he could indeed be trusted: in fact, as it has turned out,
he was and almost certainly remains the ONLY high-level US intelligence
officer who could and can be trusted, as current events reconfirm.

Which is precisely why he was ‘taken out’. He stood squarely in the way
of the greed of certain ‘Big Intelligence Barons’, led by George Bush
Sr. and the Clintons (collectively referred to, with their multifarious
associates, as ‘the Box Gang’). For these operatives lusted after the
$27.5 trillion that Leo personally controlled and of which he remains,
to this day, the sole Principal and Trustor (in case anyone has still
missed this point). Furthermore, following his operation against the
Soviet Empire, he was awarded control of United Nations contract #4
worth $5.0 trillion. In a telephone conversation with the Editor last
year, Leo Wanta confirmed that this was stolen/diverted from him by the
Clintons, a fact that appeared in International Currency Review, Volume 31, 3/4 (3).

AMBASSADOR OF SOMALIA + CHAIRMAN-DESIGNATE OF ITS CENTRAL BANK
On 11th April 1993, Sir Leo Emil Wanta was appointed by the President
of Somalia to serve as Ambassador of the Somali Republic to Canada. On
19 June 1993, he was further appointed Ambassador of the Somali
Republic to Switzerland.

While en route to Switzerland in July 1993, Leo Emil Wanta was
confirmed at a ceremony in Paris, presided over inter alia by the
French Foreign Minister of the day, Alain Juppe, as Ambassador of
Somalia to Switzerland and Canada, on the instructions of the President
of Somalia. Under this arrangement, sanctioned of course by the White
House, Leo Wanta, who had also been appointed Chairman-designate of the
Somali Central Bank, was to mastermind and direct the transformation of
Somalia by the United States into a modern economy, equipped with new
ports, airports, military bases and other infrastructure, and using the
US dollar instead of the decayed Somali dinar.

07 JULY 1993: WANTA UNLAWFULLY SEIZED BY SWISS AUTHORITIES
On 7th July 1993, despite having full diplomatic immunity from arrest,
Leo Wanta was seized illegally in Lausanne by Swiss authorities
claiming that they were acting in response to a ‘delinquent State tax
request’ (via telephone) originated by the US State of Wisconsin, which
of course has no international jurisdiction.

The Swiss admitted that they had no paperwork but advised that it would be forthcoming.

Leo Wanta subsequently received papers asserting that he had been
charged with a Federal violation and that the Wisconsin United States
District Court had issued a warrant for his arrest, even though, as an
accredited diplomat, he possessed diplomatic immunity from arrest. He
was not arrested by the Swiss authorities for any violation of Swiss
law and nor was he at any time charged with committing fraud under
Swiss law. On being detained, his diplomatic briefcase, diplomatic
pouch/satchel and luggage were illegally confiscated, contrary to
international law governing the treatment of diplomats, and also
contrary to the Swiss/USA Treaty on Tax Evasion.

18 HIGH-VALUE U.S TREASURY INSTRUMENTS IN DIPLOMATIC BRIEFCASE
Given his intended highest-level work on behalf of the Somali and US
Governments, Ambassador Leo Wanta (as he has remained designated, and
as he is universally acknowledged at the US State, Federal and
intergovernmental levels) carried in his sealed diplomatic briefcase 18
high-value US Treasury instruments, for a total face value of $18.0
billion. Please retain this information in mind for future reference.

Another purpose of the Lausanne visit had been to arrest Marc Rich
(Reich), a fugitive from US justice, on the instructions of the then
Director of the FBI, William Sessions. This covert operation failed as
a direct consequence of obstruction of justice perpetrated ‘by others’,
and Sessions was abruptly dismissed by Clinton with no explanation. It
is the Editor’s view that Marc Rich (Hans Brand) was ‘activated’ by
Clinton to procure Wanta’s arrest by the Swiss authorities, explaining
Clinton’s controversial ‘pardon’ of this long-term DVD (4) operative.
However Rich/Brand remains unable to enter the United States, since he
would be arrested on arrival, as such a pardon can only be validated by
the Court, which may have other charges to consider.

SWISS ATTEMPTED TO MURDER LEO IN THEIR FILTHY DUNGEON
The Ambassador was thrown into a stinking Swiss dungeon, where the
plumbing did not function, and where he languished for 134 days and
where an attempt was made by the Swiss authorities to have him
poisoned. Leo was offered some cheese, but as he does not eat cheese,
he gave it to a fellow prisoner, who unfortunately died because the
cheese contained an inserted poisonous substance that reacts in the
body with the fat in the cheese. Subsequently a contract doctor
servicing the ‘facility’ advised him which food was safe to eat, adding
that the Swiss authorities were in the habit of murdering prisoners in
that establishment. While in the Swiss dungeon, he learned that his
friend and associate Vince Foster had been ‘suicided’ in the Washington
DC area.

Following an intervention by Israeli Prime Minister Yizhak Rabin (who
was subsequently himself murdered), Leo Wanta was removed in shackles
on 17th November 1993 to Geneva airport, flown to New York and
arraigned before US Judge Allyce Ross in the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of New York. In May 2005, the
Ambassador’s eyes filled with tears as he described to the Editor his
humiliation and shame at being marched through Kennedy in shackles and
treated like a felon when (see below) he had of course committed no
offence whatsoever.

U.S. JUDGE ALLYCE ROSS DISMISSES ALL CHARGES, SETS WANTA FREE
At the immediate hearing, several items that were in his diplomatic
briefcase when it was unlawfully removed from him in Switzerland, were
brought to the attention of the US Court presided over by Judge Allyce
Ross. The Judge, who held the Ambassador’s two Somali diplomatic
passports, made reference to a US Treasury financial instrument with a
face value of $1.0 billion, one of the 18 instruments aggregating $18
billion, which were to have been used by Ambassador Wanta as
Chairman-designate of the Somali Central Bank to help refinance the
Somali Republic and its intended dollarised financial system.

These financial instruments and the original documents pertaining to
Leo’s official investiture and appointment as Somali Ambassador were
present inside his diplomatic briefcase at all times up to his unlawful
‘Wisconsin Tax’ arrest in Switzerland, remaining always under his
control, and were last seen by him when taken from him illegally by
Swiss authorities.

When the Judge asked Leo Wanta why he had been carrying one particular
high-value US Treasury instrument in his diplomatic briefcase, which
had been opened by FBI agents upon his arrival at Kennedy Airport, the
Assistant US Attorney (prosecuting) jumped up and asked that Her Honor
immediately dismiss all the ‘charges’ against the Ambassador.

Accordingly, the Judge dismissed all the ‘charges’ and told Leo that he
was ‘free to leave’. However none of the items that had been removed
from him in Switzerland, including the diplomatic briefcase and
satchel, were returned to him by the Court.

UNLAWFULLY REARRESTED ON COURTHOUSE STEPS WITHOUT A WARRANT
On leaving the Brooklyn Courthouse, Leo was unlawfully detained without
a warrant by New York policemen who apologetically explained that they
were ‘doing Wisconsin a favour’ and were acting on the basis of a
warrant for his arrest for alleged failure to pay State tax and vague
tax evasion charges imposed by the State of Wisconsin. However the
policemen had no warrant and Leo was never shown any warrant or
provided with a copy of any charges filed by the State of Wisconsin at
that time. He then remained illegally incarcerated without a warrant in
the State of New York until 13th December 1993, when law enforcement
officers from Wisconsin finally extradited him unlawfully to that
State, where he had not resided for many years.

Moreover, since 1985, he had been working abroad on high-level US
Government Presidential business, while in June 1988 he had obtained
formal authorisation from the Vienna Court to reside in Austria
(permanent Austrian residency can only be provided by legal process in
Court).

The pretext for Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta’s unlawful detention turned
out to be that he owed Wisconsin State tax of $14,129 dating from 1982
and 1988. However he had already paid (in 1992) this unlawfully
demanded State tax assessment not once, but twice: and as will be seen
below, the Editor has proof of payment in both cases.

The Editor further has in his possession a copy of a State of Wisconsin
INCOME TAX REFUND addressed to Leo E. Wanta, dated 11 May 1984 for the
WI State tax year 1983, in the amount of $2,053.00 (Form 1099-G, issued
by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue, PO Box 8903, WI 53708), citing
Leo’s Social Security Number correctly. Manifestly, therefore, Leo
could not have had any State tax outstanding from 1982, otherwise he
would not have received this refund.

Moreover he had not been resident in Wisconsin after 1985 and had since
June 1988 been a resident of Vienna, Austria, where he operated inter
alia as Director-General of New Republic/USA Financial Group,
GES.m.b.H., one of his USG Title 18, Section 6 intelligence
corporations, from Karntnerstrasse 28/15, A-1010 Wien. The State tax
levied against him was and remains fraudulent (even though the same tax
was paid multiple times: see below). Furthermore, no foreigner can be
owner and Chairman of an Austrian corporation without being a permanent
resident of the Republic of Austria.

Conspicuously absent from this list was any reference to either the
$1.0 billion face value US Treasury instrument that had been drawn to
the attention of Judge Allyce Ross in the US Court in New York, or to
the 17 other high-value US Treasury instruments, for an aggregate face
value of $18 billion, contained in his diplomatic briefcase and
intended for the furtherance of the legitimate business of the
Presidents of the United States and Somalia.

Neither the diplomatic briefcase nor the other items illegally seized
from the Ambassador in Switzerland have been returned to him. The
reason that they have not been returned to him, obviously, is that if
the diplomatic briefcase were given back to him, it would need to
contain the 18 high-value US Treasury instruments of which he was and
remains the sole custodian in his official capacity working for both
the US and the Somali Governments.

The only possible conclusion that can be drawn from this is that the 18
high-value US Treasury instruments have been stolen, and used by
corrupt US parties at corrupt banks as collateral, for illegal untaxed
hypothecation and fiat money creation purposes.

FAMILY HOME SOLD BEHIND HIS BACK, PROCEEDS STOLEN
To add to Leo’s injuries, as soon as he was “imprisoned” inside the
GULAG, the ruthless Wisconsin authorities sold his former Wisconsin
family home, behind his back and without his permission, for a
knock-down price of around $60,000, and kept the proceeds. All attempts
to procure a proper accounting of this theft have failed (so far).

The property is now lived in by a State of Wisconsin Attorney.

By March 2004, Leo Wanta had already languished for nine months in
jails in Switzerland and the US GULAG, which distinguished itself at
the outset by forcing him to be subjected to a strip-search in the snow
– behaviour indistinguishable from what happens in the Soviet GULAG,
about which the US State Department affected such outrage for decades.

Moreover the suffering inflicted on Leo was not even ‘justified’ on the fraudulent grounds that he owed $14,129, because:

1. In order to dispose of this illegal ‘nuisance’ State tax assessment
demand, a remittance of $14,129 had been conveyed by Leo Wanta from
Singapore, where he was working at the time on USG business, on 15th
May 1992. Specifically, a Telegraphic Transfer of $14,129 was effected
by Malaysian Banking Berhad on behalf of Leo Wanta in favour of Wanta’s
Wisconsin Attorney, Thomas Wilson, to his Attorney Trust Account with
Bank One, Appleton, Wisconsin 54911, account #414780, being the
proceeds from Singapore dollars 23,281.33, on which the bank charged
its commission of S$29.17 plus the cable cost of a further S$20.40. The
falsely demanded $14,129 was duly paid over by Attorney Wilson under
protest to the Wisconsin Department of Revenue.

2. Notwithstanding this payment, a further State civil tax assessment
demand for the same $14,129 was received by Leo Wanta almost
immediately. This second illegal and fraudulent State civil tax
assessment was likewise pragmatically settled – again, in order to
dispose of this nuisance – by means of Trust Account check number 6992
drawn by Bachman, Cummings, McKenzie, Hebbe, McIntyre & Wilson,
S.C., Attorneys at Law, 211 E. Franklin Street, P.O. Box 1155,
Appleton, WI 54912. This second Attorney Client Trust Account check,
marked FUNDS OFFERED IN COMPROMISE FOR LEO E. WANTA and citing his
correct Social Security, was banked by the State Treasurer of
Wisconsin, Milwaukee, on 6th June 1992, as shown on the reverse of the
cleared check per clearing reference 075000 022, a copy of which, along
with other documents cited here, is in the Editor’s possession.

Hence, over a year before Leo Wanta was unlawfully arrested in
Switzerland on trumped-up tax charges, he had already paid the
fraudulently raised Wisconsin State civil tax assessment demand of
$14,129 not once, but TWICE. Far from being tax delinquent, he had paid
the State’s illegal extortion demands TWICE, even though he actually
owed NOTHING.

Already, therefore, a gross uncorrected miscarriage of justice had
taken place, while the Wisconsin Department of Revenue had fraudulently
received and banked the same tax assessment payment TWICE. Subsequent
research has established that since this corrupt Department appears to
keep two sets of books – one in Madison, and the other in Milwaukee –
the duplication of the fraudulent tax demand may have been nothing out
of the ordinary.

But it soon got much worse.

WANTA SHIFTED ENDLESSLY AROUND THE U.S. AND WISCONSIN GULAG
Leo Wanta was moved around the US GULAG, spending many months, for
instance, at a GULAG maximum facility in the State of Oklahoma. During
that period, he was regularly removed from his cell, his cell was
searched, items were taken from his cell and they were not returned.
The papers taken from his cell included legal documents, files, and
papers from Attorneys. Institution authorities from the State of
Oklahoma informed him that they lacked certain background information
on him, and requested his cooperation in obtaining the information.

So Leo provided the requested cooperation and learned from institution
personnel that they had queried the Wisconsin State Department of
Corrections, which had confirmed that no criminal background report was
available on him.

DEPUTY SHERIFF TRIES TO MURDER WANTA IN PRISON WASHROOM
A routine was now established whereby Leo was deliberately moved around
the Wisconsin/US GULAG, so that his mail always lagged behind his
latest movements, and/or failed to catch up with him. At least four
attempts were made to murder him inside the US GULAG. Of these, the
most outrageous was the criminal behaviour of a Deputy Sheriff, who
drove up to the Kettle Moraine Corrections Facility in Wisconsin,
changed into prisoner’s clothing, established proximity to Leo and
attempted to murder him in the washroom. On that occasion, his life was
saved by Duty Sergeant Randy Miller who dragged the deputised murderer
out of the washroom and the prisoners’ quarters.

The intruder then fled back to the administration area, took off his
false prisoner’s clothing, dressed back in his Deputy Sheriff’s
uniform, and made off in his County car.

When these successive Soviet-style liquidation attempts failed, the
Soviet technique of trying to have Leo certified insane, was attempted.
At the seventh attempt, his fate was sealed when a doctor, Dr Connie
Lee, Chief Psychiatrist for the State of Wisconsin, mindful of such
abuses, and fully satisfied that Leo was mentally stable and
proficient, refused to go along with the State’s conspiracy and
certified Leo to be of sound mind.

After that episode, attempts to delete him from history ceased.

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY LIED THAT HE WAS DEAD
Meanwhile the Central Intelligence Agency had put the word about that
Leo Emil Wanta was dead. This false information was disseminated among
strictly compartmentalised agents and cadres, with poor knowledge of
the broader picture, and throughout the relevant sectors of the
international financial community. Given this ‘tabula rasa’ situation,
the coast was clear (or so the criminalists assumed) to ransack, steal,
misappropriate, misuse, divert, claim, usurp, collateralise,
hypothecate and otherwise unlawfully exploit the $27.5 trillion of
which Leo Emil Wanta was and remains the sole Principal and Trustor.
All concerned were happy with this illegal state of affairs – which has
been continued without ceasing using also the Ambassador’s $4.5
trillion compromise funds Settlement agreed in May 2006. Specifically:

• The international banks holding Wanta’s
Title 18, Section 6 bank accounts were delighted that they held vast
sums with no apparent impediment to the banks using the funds for their
own collateralisation, hypothecation and manipulation purposes, without
any prospect (so they assumed) of having to account for the funds, or
ever being called upon to release them. Some of these criminal banks
may shortly face their overdue day of reckoning.

• US criminal intelligence operatives and
their highest-level ‘Barons’ looked upon this cornucopia of ‘free
funds’ as an unprecedented opportunity (a) for untaxed offshore
self-enrichment and (b) for the financing of their mad New World Order
operations, which, as the whole world has seen, are leading the world
not towards a new earthly utopia, but at high speed towards a new hell
on earth.

WANTA BANK ASSETS PLACED IN PERSONAL NAME OF JAN MORTON HEGER
The Editor is aware of one case, concerning assets owned by Ambassador
Leo Wanta that are located in the United Kingdom, and which have been
lodged with a British bank branch in the personal name of a US Attorney
who was at one time employed by Leo Wanta and the CIA. His name is Jan
Morton Heger. The account in question has been held at Lloyds Bank PLC,
Market Square Aylesbury Branch, 1 Market Square, Aylesbury,
Buckinghamshire HP20 1TD (5).

MOVEMENTS OF THE $27.5 TRILLION AND THE $4.5 TRILLION RECORDED
What the corrupt manipulators and exploiters of Ambassador Wanta’s
funds appear to have overlooked throughout is the pertinent fact that,
for the past several years, every single movement of the funds of which
Leo Emil Wanta is the sole Principal and Trustor have been monitored
and recorded by secret electronic means, using enhancements of PROMIS
software. Hence, all who have been making hay while they thought the
sun shone are liable to be deprived, as they wake up to the situation,
of a good night’s sleep for the rest of their lives. Indeed, the more
they manipulate and engage in corrupt financial transactions based on
Leo Wanta’s funds, the tighter is the noose with which they are hanging
themselves, being tied. At a given stage of this crisis, all of a
sudden large numbers of these people will find themselves at the
receiving end of legal processes – as a result of which many will be
liable to become familiar with the atrocious US GULAG conditions
suffered by Ambassador Leo Wanta without a cause.

CARELESS CIA LIE FACTORY TRIPS OVER ITS OLD LIES
While the CIA was lying that Leo Wanta was dead, it was inconsistently
maintaining the opposite as late as 5 November 2003, the date of a
letter from the CIA’s John T Martinez, Attorney Adviser, to Thomas E
Henry, a lawyer appointed to serve Leo Wanta from time to time. In this
letter, the CIA apparatchik referred to Leo Wanta not as someone who
was long since dead, as the CIA itself was separately insisting, but
rather in the present tense, as a living person. Mr Martinez lied in
his second paragraph that ‘CIA has no information that Mr Wanta ever
has had any relationship with the CIA’. The letter concluded with the
following typical CIA apparatchik cop-out, which is included here in
passing: ‘Lastly, the Director of Central Intelligence is charged with
protecting intelligence sources and methods from unauthorised
disclosure. The discharge of this responsibility often requires that
the CIA decline to confirm or deny the existence or non-existence of
CIA information on the subject matter of a particular request’.

Given this opaque language, it was hardly necessary for the apparatchik
to lie that the CIA ‘has no information that Mr Wanta never has had any
relationship or affiliation with the CIA’. But since lies are what the
CIA does, Mr Martinez evidently considered it necessary to include the
gratuitous lie identified here. His letter would have been incomplete
without it.

FBI FABRICATIONS USED AS PERJURED EVIDENCE IN KANGAROO COURT
The CIA’s lies were complemented by a completely separate batch of lies
perpetrated and fed to the Court ostensibly by the FBI – specifically
by a John A. Hartingh, Section Chief, Information Resources Section,
Information Resources Division. In a letter dated 8th September 1995 to
Douglas Haag, Assistant Attorney General, Department of Justice, State
of Wisconsin, 123 Washington Avenue, P.O. Box 7857, Madison, WI
53707-7857, this apparatchik retailed a concoction of lies, half-truths
and diversionary claptrap which was then used by Mr Haag to mislead
Judge Michael B. Torphy, Circuit Judge, at the Wisconsin Department of
Justice, Branch 2, Circuit County Building, Room 214, 210 Martin Luther
King Jr. Boulevard, Madison, WI 53709-0001. This was done via a
hand-delivered letter from Mr Haag to Judge Torphy dated 12th September
1995.

In the ensuing kangaroo court hearing, the Judge was lied to on the
basis of this purported FBI document, and false witness was borne
against Leo Wanta by Douglas Haag and Wisconsin Attorney General (now
Governor) James Doyle in flagrant disregard of the truth, which was
turned upside down by the FBI letter signed by John A. Hartingh. When
Thomas Henry, Attorney for Leo Emil Wanta, later enquired of the FBI
whether this letter was genuine, he received a strange, equivocal and
meandering response, implying that suspicions that the letter is a
forgery and/or a rogue document, may be accurate. This is likely for a
number of reasons.

First, several different typewriters or word processors appear to have
been used, with different spacing and typeface variations. Secondly,
the letter diverges conspicuously from the FBI’s own rigorously
enforced standards for such correspondence, which are laid down in
regulations from which agents may not depart under any circumstances.
And thirdly the letter from Mr Hartingh to Assistant Attorney General
Douglas Haag concluded with the following language:

‘The information in this document contains neither recommendations nor
conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to
your agency. It and its contents ARE NOT TO BE RELASED TO WANTA nor is
it to be released under the Wisconsin Open Records Act’ [Editor’s
emphasis]. Hence Leo Wanta was precluded from seeing the document that
was used in order to provide the Judge with perjured evidence and to
perpetrate fraud upon the Court and the Ambassador.

DENIAL OF STANDARD OF JUDICIAL PRACTICE OF ‘OPEN DISCOVERY’
This extraordinary demand also flew in the face of the system of
mandatory legal open discovery which requires that under due process
and disclosure rules, all documents pertinent to a court case are
accessible, so that the Judge and jury, and both sides of the case, are
fully informed in order for the judicial system to function properly.
The deliberate suppression of a document from the defendant was itself
a felony and a grave fraud against the Court, since it was used
specifically to misinform the Judge and to bear false witness against
Leo Wanta to the Court, which accordingly reverberated with perjury and
lies: hence our use of the term ‘kangaroo court’.

When asked, as noted above, whether this letter was genuine, or whether
it represented a rogue, fraudulent document (fabricated to implicate
Leo Wanta and to mislead the Court), the FBI refused to give a direct
answer, implying that it is indeed a fabrication.

But since the FBI has neither confirmed nor denied that it is a rogue
document, and indeed ceased to communicate with Mr Henry when he
pressed them on the matter, the Ambassador is entitled to continue to
assume that the FBI was responsible for perpetrating the lies and
misinformation contained in Mr Hartingh’s letter to the Assistant
Attorney General of Wisconsin.

COMPETING, INCONSISTENT CIA/FBI LIES MAKE A MOCKERY OF U.S. ‘JUSTICE’
The purported FBI apparatchik’s deceitful and now supposedly fabricated
rogue letter took no account of the parallel lies being perpetrated by
the CIA, including the MASTER LIE that Leo Wanta was dead. In other
words, the CIA and FBI lie factories are so permanently at loggerheads
with each other that they cannot even be bothered to coordinate their
lies, to avoid the kind of ridicule and odium that is now being heaped
upon them because of the crude injustices that have been cynically
perpetrated against Ambassador Leo Wanta, thanks to their amoral
behaviour.

The FBI’s unwillingness to authenticate the letter signed by Hartingh
which formed the basis of the farrago of lies retailed to Judge Michael
B. Torphy, resulting in Leo Wanta’s incarceration, house arrest and
probation, further illuminates the high level source of the miscarriage
of justice that is in the process of unravelling before our eyes. As
this avalanche breaks loose, it will engulf many official
co-conspirators who have spent years under the illusion that their
merciless past crimes would remain buried forever. That is no longer
even on the cards.

Citing the CIA ‘hatchet job’ ‘Thieves’ World’, a book by the late
Claire Sterling, a CIA operative (6), which contained disinformation
and lies about Leo Wanta, and adding gross new lies to the old ones,
Hartingh’s ‘fabricated’ letter misinformed Haag and thus Judge Torphy
that ‘Wanta was arrested by the Vaud Cantonal Police on July 7, 1993,
in Lausanne, Switzerland, for attempted bank fraud in the amount of $1
million and for the use of false documents’. These statements were
fabrications and wholly without any foundation in fact. The Swiss
authorities cited no breach of Swiss law either when they falsely
arrested Ambassador Wanta, in breach of his diplomatic status, or at
any time thereafter.

The FBI’s letter then retailed (from ‘Thieves’ World’) that ‘Wanta was
described as a well-known con artist’ – omitting to explain that the
person who ‘described’ Wanta thus was the CIA disinformation agent
Claire Sterling. She had her tragic come-uppance when she died suddenly
and unexpectedly after a second interview with the FBI following her
book’s appearance.

It later became known to the Editor, from two separate sources, that
President Clinton had ordered all copies of ‘Thieves’ World’ to be
seized. However, after the Editor obtained his own copy from the
second-hand book market, an American intelligence operative with
knowledge of this fact commented: ‘I thought we’d got them all’. No
doubt one reason (but far from the only one) for the book being seized
was to cover up the source of the disinformation that the FBI was now
using in fulfilment of the Clinton White House’s incompetent and messy
ongoing backfilling operation to discredit the Ambassador, to steal his
assets, to perpetrate fraud against him and the Wisconsin Court and, if
at all possible, to erase him from history.

John A. Hartingh’s deceitful letter elaborated that this ‘con artist’
‘claimed to have high level connections in the US Government, including
the White House, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the US Secret
Service, the US Customs Service, as well as the FBI. Wanta also claimed
to be a close friend of both Presidents Reagan and Bush Sr. and to be a
CIA operative responsible for operations in Singapore. Each of the
claims proved spurious’.

AMBASSADOR’S CLAIMS ALL TRUE, FBI’S CLAIMS WERE ALL FALSE
In reality, these claims were all true, every single one of them; and
the unsupported, dogmatic statement that they were spurious was an
egregious lie, designed to mislead and commit fraud against the Court
and to ensure the completion of a conspiracy, coordinated by the White
House, to procure the erasure of all traces of Leo Wanta from the
record, for an originally intended period of 22 years. However Leo
never ceased to resist this avalanche of lies, injustice and false
witness, sustained by his remarkable faith – and certain that, in the
end, he would be vindicated. It took 14 years for his steadfast faith
to begin to be rewarded.

In the meantime, however, the Wisconsin Department of Revenue
compounded its criminal errors, as will now be explained. Indeed, it is
continuing to do so, not least because if it were belatedly to
acknowledge its serially fraudulent and unlawful behaviour, the
conviction of Ambassador Wanta would have to be formally reversed, with
immense judicial and financial consequences for the State of Wisconsin,
and for many well-known figures there and ‘inside the Beltway’. The
irony, of course, is that the march of events is making this outcome
inevitable anyway, as will come to be widely appreciated as this year
progresses.

WHEN TAXMEN COMMIT FRAUD, THEY CREATE LONG-TERM PROBLEMS
If fraud is committed inside a tax department, it is liable to have to
be perpetuated from year to year – so that internal measures have to be
taken on a continuing and expanding basis, to cover up or to obfuscate
the serial frauds, given extensive auditing and the ongoing possibility
of exposure or whistleblowing by disaffected staff members at any time.

As will be recalled, the Wisconsin Department of Revenue had received
and banked two amounts of $14,129 paid by Leo Wanta in 1992, over a
year prior to his unlawful arrest in Lausanne for not having paid the
illegally demanded $14,129. Hence, years before the same $14,129 was
paid for the third time in 2005 (see below), the Wisconsin Department
of Revenue therefore faced the problem of how to contrive to obfuscate
this prospectively dangerous state of affairs (from their own twisted
perspective).

One method adopted to obfuscate matters was predicated upon maintaining
that Leo and Joanne Wanta filed their tax returns in Wisconsin jointly.
However the two had been separated, and then divorced, years earlier.
The Wisconsin Department of Revenue chose to disregard this reality,
just as it chose to disregard the fact that Leo Wanta had not been
resident in Wisconsin since 1985 and owed no tax from previous years,
as confirmed by the refund of $2,053.00 dated 11th May 1984, to which
reference has been made. But US State tax authorities are required to
reflect the status of taxpayers as recognised by the Internal Revenue
Service, which wrote from Kansas City on 23 April 1999 per LTR 2358C,
signed by Dorothy G Smith, Collection Branch, to Leo E. & Joanne
Wanta (jointly) with reference to Tax Period ending 31st December 1988:

‘Dear Taxpayer (in the singular): Based on our information, you are not
liable for filing a tax return for this period’ [December 1988].

Now it follows that if no Federal Tax is payable (because no filing is
required) for a given period, it has not been charged; and if Federal
Tax is not chargeable, then State Tax cannot be chargeable either,
since it is impossible to live in a State of the Union without
simultaneously living in the Federation itself. Therefore, the IRS was
maintaining that Leo and Joanne Wanta filed their taxes together, while
also stating specifically that the ‘Taxpayer’ did not need to file a
tax return for the period ending 31st December 1988. That applied of
course to Leo Wanta, since, being officially resident in Vienna and
having been operating for USG abroad since 1985, and since his personal
expenses were paid by his foreign-based Title 18, Section 6
corporations, he had no State taxable income and was subject neither to
Federal nor to State tax for any year after 1985. However Joanne Wanta,
long since estranged from and out of contact with, Leo Wanta, was
subject to both.

At all events, the first anomaly that the Wisconsin Department of
Revenue now exploited for the purposes of obfuscation was the joint
filing of tax returns by Joanne and Leo Wanta. Although the illegally
raised State tax assessment demand had been paid TWICE under protest by
Leo Wanta in 1992, as already reported, the State chased them jointly
for both $14,129 AND interest of
$10,358.54, for a total of $25,082.54, as per a Wisconsin Department of Revenue ‘Worksheet’ dated 1st September 1996.

This overlooked the fact that the Wisconsin Department of Revenue had
issued DELINQUENT TAX WARRANT #44-00162088 against Joanne E. Wanta on
1st June 1993, which was formally declared to be fully satisfied by the
State of Wisconsin Outagamie County Circuit Court’s Satisfaction of
Delinquent Tax Warrant filed on 4th June 1993 at Outagamie County by
Ruth H. Janssen, Clerk of Courts. The text of this document reads:

‘This Warrant has been fully satisfied and the Clerk of said Court is
authorised to satisfy and discharge said Tax Warrant pursuant to S.
71.91(5)(f) of the Wis. Stats’.

A Delinquent Tax Warrant can be ‘fully satisfied’ only ONCE. Or, to be
even more precise, it is impossible, is it not, to satisfy a Delinquent
Tax Warrant by more than 100%. At least, that is the universally
recognised legal and mathematical state of affairs, not least given
that satisfaction of a Delinquent Tax Warrant takes precedence in
relevant law over all other claims.

TAX GESTAPO CREATES TWO TAX WARRANTS WITH THE SAME NUMBER
Everywhere, that is, other than in the State of Wisconsin, which prefers its Delinquent Tax Warrants to be satisfied by 200%.

Let us explain how they seek to achieve this, from the Wanta case record.

The Editor possesses a copy of Delinquent Tax Warrant #44-00162088
issued on 9th May 1991 by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue for
$10,398.00 (representing a notional assessment which, a year later, had
risen to $14,129). This Wisconsin Delinquent Tax Warrant #44-00162088
is addressed to Joanne ‘G’. Wanta, even though Joanne Wanta’s middle
initial had always previously been ‘E’. On this Delinquent Tax Warrant,
the name Leo E. Wanta has been “scratched out” by the tax authority.

The Editor further possesses a copy of Delinquent Tax Warrant
#44-00162088 issued on 9th May 1991 by the Wisconsin Department of
Revenue for $10,398.00 (representing a notional assessment which, a
year later, had risen to $14,129). This Delinquent Tax Warrant
#44-00162088 is addressed to Leo E. Wanta, while the name Joanne ‘G’
Wanta has been “scratched out” by the State tax authority. This
Delinquent Tax Warrant carries the same Delinquent Tax Warrant number,
#44-00162088, as the Delinquent Tax Warrant issued against Joanne ‘G’
Wanta (above).

(The Editor ALSO has in his possession a copy of Delinquent Tax Warrant
#44-00162088 issued on 9th May 1991 by the Wisconsin Department of
Revenue for $10,398.00 (representing a notional tax assessment which, a
year later, had risen to $14,129). This Delinquent Tax Warrant
#44-00162088 is addressed to Leo E. Wanta and Joanne ‘G’ Wanta, with
neither name “scratched out”. In other words, this is the ORIGINAL
Delinquent Tax Warrant raised in their joint names, from which the two
Delinquent Tax Warrants listed above, both using the same Delinquent
Tax Warrant #44-00162088 were derived, having split in two like the
cells of an amoeba).

… THEREBY ‘JUSTIFYING’ COLLECTION OF THE SAME $14,129 TWICE
Net result: the single Delinquent Tax Warrant #44-00162088 became TWO
Delinquent Tax Warrants, both carrying the same Delinquent Tax Warrant
#44-00162088, and both demanding payment of notional tax assessments of
$10,398.00, so that the total actually being demanded by the Wisconsin
Department of Revenue had suddenly doubled, to $20,796.00.

While this fraud was being perpetrated, the Wisconsin State tax
authorities were nevertheless dealing directly with Joanne ‘G’. Wanta,
who allowed them to believe that one of the amounts of $14,129
($10,398.00 plus a further notional tax assessment of $3,731 for 1989
when Leo Wanta was of course legally a permanent resident of Austria)
which had resulted in Delinquent Tax Warrant #44-00162088 being ‘fully
satisfied’ as of 4th June 1993, represented settlement of her tax
liability – whereas in reality both remittances of $14,129 by Leo Wanta
from Singapore were made under protest in respect of tax assessment on
Leo Wanta personally, demanded and assessed unlawfully by the Wisconsin
Department of Revenue against a diplomat who had no State tax
obligations whatsoever, was not required to file a tax return to the
IRS, was a legal resident of Vienna from June 1988 onwards, and had
been resident outside the State of Wisconsin since 1985, when he owed
the State nothing as confirmed by its earlier refund. Indeed, Leo Wanta
had reported to the State of Wisconsin per Income Schedule I-890 dated
21 August 1990 that he had no State taxable income for the tax years
1986, 1987, 1988 and 1989, while also confirming that he had
established his new legal residence in Vienna, Austria, with effect
from 20th January 1989.

The Vienna Court had granted Leo Wanta legal residency in June 1988,
effective six months later in accordance with Austrian practice. The
Wisconsin Department of Revenue chose to focus on this date, and to
disregard altogether the fact that Leo Wanta had been operating abroad
since 1985, and had owed nothing to the State since then – as he
certified on Income Schedule 1-890, and as further confirmed by the
earlier tax refund.

IN JULY 2005, THE SAME $14,129 (+ EXTRAS) IS PAID FOR THE THIRD TIME
Fast forward now to the first quarter of 2005. After several years of
research, the Editor had managed to satisfy himself that Leo Wanta had
been unlawfully ‘taken down’ because he stood in the way, as an
‘honourable counsellor’, of massive intergovernmental and US official
level financial criminality perpetrated through the exploitation of
Ambassador Wanta’s Title 18, Section 6 funds originally worth $27.5
trillion.

At the Ambassador’s suggestion, the Editor took the Amtrak train to
Richmond, where he met Steven Goodwin, an Attorney for Leo Wanta. It
transpired that Mr Goodwin had negotiated an agreement with the
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, whereby if the sum of $30,626.97
were paid to that Department by 28th November 2005, the Department of
Corrections would recommend to Judge Michael B. Torphy that Leo’s
(illegal) probation – his incarceration had been followed by house
arrest/probation in 2001 – should be terminated, and his complete
freedom finally restored.

When the Editor asked what would happen if this further extortion
amount, which still included the $14,129 paid twice already in 1992,
was not paid over by 28th November 2005, he was told that Leo Wanta
would be liable to be slammed back into jail. It had also become quite
clear to the Editor that no-one was lifting a finger to generate the
$30,626.97, so that the strong likelihood was that 28th November 2005
would come round and the situation facing the Ambassador would
consequently take a violent turn for the worse.

After careful further consideration, therefore, the Editor decided that
the right thing to do was to make the necessary funds available from
scarce private (not corporate) resources, and so a bank draft for
$35,000 was accordingly sent by courier from London to Steven Goodwin
in July 2005. On 21st July 2005, Mr Goodwin, at the Editor’s request,
attended at the relevant premises of the Wisconsin Department of
Corrections, and duly obtained its Receipt #2270992 PP dated 7/21/05
signed by Department of Corrections Agent Michelle Riel confirming that
the Wisconsin Department of Corrections had received Bank of America
check number 1098 signed by Steven Goodwin for $30,626.97. This
Attorney check was duly banked by the Wisconsin Department of
Corrections and the Editor holds the front and back of the banked check
by way of absolute proof of payment.

By means of this further ‘protest’ remittance, the original $14,129
that had been settled TWICE in 1992, was now settled FOR THE THIRD
TIME, given that the computation incorporated that precise illegally
charged amount of $14,129 plus unlawfully charged interest.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ACCEPTS THE THIRD $14,129++ PAYMENT
On 22nd July 2005, Agent Michelle Riel generated a computerised ‘Client
Account Inquiry’ print-out, on which she annotated in her handwriting:
‘Paid in full on 7/21/05, Michelle Riel’. She furnished it to Attorney
Steven Goodwin and Mr Goodwin forwarded it to the Editor of this
service.

On 28th July 2005, Agent Michelle Riel wrote to Judge Michael B. Torphy Jr. in Madison, as follows:

RE: Early Discharge, Leo E. Wanta 92CF638B:

On 05/11/95, Lee E Wanta appeared in your Court and was [FALSELY,
because of the false witness, lies and perjury at the kangaroo court
trial – Ed.] convicted of counts 1-2 Penalties (Filing False Income Tax
Return) and counts 3-6 Penalties (Tax Evasion). Mr Wanta was sentenced
to eight years in prison on counts 3-6 and was placed on probation for
counts 1-2, to be served consecutive to the prison term. He was ordered
to pay $29,068.55 for restitution, $100.00 for a victim witness
surcharge, and $1,458.42 for another surcharge.

On 06/28/01 [EIGHT YEARS AFTER HIS ILLEGAL ARREST AND ‘TAKEDOWN’ – Ed.]
Mr Wanta was released from prison and on 11/28/04, Mr Wanta¹s parole
case discharged and he began his consecutive probation case. Mr Wanta
has not had any known violations. On 07/21/05, Mr Wanta’s court ordered
financial obligations were paid in full.

At this time the Department of Corrections is asking if the Court has
any objections to allowing Mr Wanta to discharge from probation early.

Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,
Agent Michelle Riel
Probation/Parole Agent 50901

SO JUDGE AUTHORISES END OF WANTA’S (UNLAWFUL) PROBATION
In response to this request, Judge Michael B. Torphy gave his consent
and on 14th November 2005, Matthew J. Frank, Secretary, Wisconsin
Department of Corrections, signed a DISCHARGE in the following terms:

‘To whom it may concern:

Leo E. Wanta 303787-A ‘B’ CASE

Was placed on probation,
The Department having determined that the above named has satisfied said probation,
It is ordered that effective November 14, 2005

LEO E.WANTA
IS DISCHARGED ABSOLUTELY.

This discharge does not forgive your current (tentative) balance of unpaid supervision fees in the amount of $0.00’.

30 OCTOBER 2006: TAX GESTAPO DEMANDS SAME $14,129 A FOURTH TIME
Notwithstanding all of the above, the Wisconsin Department of Revenue
issued a further demand for the SAME $14,129 PLUS INTEREST, on 30th
October 2006 (see below).

Given that the Editor had disbursed scarce private funds as detailed
above, you can imagine the response to this news in our London office.

PROOF THAT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PAID THE TAX GESTAPO
The first task was to establish whether the Wisconsin Department of
Corrections had actually paid the amount falsely ‘due’, to the
Wisconsin Department of Revenue from the Editor’s own funds, or whether
the WI Department of Corrections was corrupt as well as the Wisconsin
Department of Revenue. That the Department of Corrections had behaved
‘correctly’ was finally confirmed, in response to urgent enquiries, in
an email to the Editor dated 10 November 2006 timed at 16:36 from John
A. Dipko, the Public Information Officer, Wisconsin Department of
Corrections [email address: John.Dipko@DOC.state.wi.us], Subject: Leo Wanta, the text of which reads as follows:

A restitution order is on file for this criminal case; it includes
$24,900.91 for the Wisconsin Department of Revenue and $4,167.64 for
the Wisconsin Public Defender’s Office.

This restitution order is dated 6-3-1996 and is a public record available at the Dane County Clerk of Courts Office.

Our records indicate that Mr Wanta made the $30,626.97 payment that you
referenced. The Department of Corrections collected the money from Mr
Wanta and then dispersed [sic] two separate checks dated Aug 4 2005
totalling $29,068.55: one in the amount of $24,900.91 payable to the
Wisconsin Department of Revenue, and the other in the amount of
$4,167.64 payable to the Wisconsin Public Defender’s Office. The
remaining $1,558.42 accounts for fees and surcharges that had been
assessed to Mr Wanta. Mr Wanta discharged from Department of
Corrections supervision on Nov 14, 2005.

I would refer you to the Dane County Clerk of Courts, the Wisconsin
Department of Revenue or the Wisconsin Public Defender’s Office for any
additional enquiries.

Sincerely,

John Dipko
Public Information Director
Wisconsin Dept or Corrections608-240-5060.

DEALING WITH THE FOURTH ASSESSMENT OF THE SAME $14,129+++
On 30th October 2006, Mr Gregg T. Frazier, of the Wisconsin Department
of Revenue, issued a document marked ‘Amended’ to Leo Wanta displaying
a ‘Total Amount Due’ of $43,304.42, consisting of the following
components: ‘Regular Interest’, $29,175.42 plus ‘Penalty’ of
$14,129.00.

Recognise this figure?

It is of course THE SAME $14,129 that was paid under protest TWICE in
1992, and a THIRD TIME by the Editor of this service via Attorney
Steven Goodwin on 21st July 2005.

On this document is annotated in handwriting:

‘Per Wisconsin Supreme Court Order Dated December 30, 2005’.

SECRET COURT ORDER OF WHICH VICTIM HAD NO KNOWLEDGE
Ambassador Leo Wanta had no knowledge of any such Court Order,
demanding payment of $14,129 that had already been settled under
protest on three occasions, plus illegally charged interest on top of
the thrice-settled amount of $14,129.

Accompanying this piece of paper was a letter addressed to Leo Wanta,
which is the Ambassador’s intelligence name: he was baptised Leo Emil
Wanta and his Social Security Number is in the name of Lee Emil Wanta.
The Social Security number is assigned to Lee Emil Wanta (the name Leo
has always required for his intelligence work); but to add to their
ongoing obfuscation ruses, the Wisconsin Department of Revenue have
exploited this intelligence-related circumstance for their own purposes
(see below).

‘Dear Leo Wanta: In view of the Wisconsin Supreme Court decision on
your appeal of the income tax assessment made by this Department dated
January 29, 1996, I must ask you to send us your remittance now (as
indicated on the Notice of Amount Due) with your remittance. Please
return the Notice of Amount Due with your remittance. Sincerely, Gregg
T. Frazier, Chief, Central Audit Section gfrazier@dor.state.wi.us’.

The Notice of Amount Due issued by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue
on 30th October 2006, cited Lee Emil Wanta’s Social Security Number
correctly, and had the following File Number: 000000000/0 and the
following Worksheet ID: 000403423. It stated that the due date for
payment of $43,304.42 was January 01, 2007, and that the check was to
be made payable and mailed forthwith to: Wisconsin Department of
Revenue, Box 93408, Milwaukee, WI 53293-0208.

The document referred to in Mr Frazier’s letter and dated 29 January
2006 is an Office Audit Worksheet addressed to Leo E. Wanta and Joanne
E. Wanta jointly from the Wisconsin Department of Revenue, Post Office
Box 2906, Madison, W 53708 itemising ‘Tax Due’ of $14,129.00 plus
‘Regular Interest’ of $10,953.94, for an illegally demanded assessment
total of $25,082.54, referring to tax years 1988 and 1989. The
‘Auditor’ who generated that document in 1996 was R. N. Doornek. Note
that ‘Tax Due’ of $14,129 as of 29 January 1996 had now metamorphosed
into ‘Penalty’ of $14,129 in the fraudulent ‘Amended’ documentation
issued by Gregg T. Frazier, Chief, Central Audit Section dated 30th
October 2006. As reiterated, the $14,129 had been paid three times
already.

Get this: an illegally raised civil tax assessment for $14,129 that has
been ‘fully satisfied’ per a discharged Delinquent Tax Warrant as of
4th June 1993, even though it had been settled under protest TWICE over
a year earlier, and which was settled for the third time under protest
in July 2005, has now become a ‘Penalty’. Do the Wisconsin State Tax
Gestapo crooks imagine that by suddenly relabelling an illegally
assessed and thrice-paid amount, it assumes a ‘new legitimacy’ by some
weird kind of Wisconsin organised criminal magick?

TAX GESTAPO APPARATCHIK GETS SHARP END OF EDITOR’S TONGUE
The Editor of this service telephoned this Mr Frazier twice in early
November last year, and on the second occasion was actually able to
speak with him. His extremely frigid demeanour changed marginally when
it was sharply pointed out to him that we have documentary proof of
banked payment of the $14,129, from which his latest illegal demand is
derived, and not once, but three times, no less. On two occasions
during the telephone conversation, Mr Frazier informed this Editor that
‘I’ll have to look into it’.

He appears to have reneged on this undertaking, as will now be reviewed.

GESTAPO TRIES TO COLLECT THE SAME $14,129+++ A FOURTH TIME
On 1st December 2006, the Wisconsin Department of Revenue, Madison,
issued a ‘Statement of Account – Individual Income Tax’ for the filing
period 12/31/1990 for $43,304.42 for ‘Tax Account Number’ 001-1025313
166-02 addressed to Leo E. Wanta. This demand was received by Lee Emil
Wanta on 30th December 2006. On 18th January 2007, Lee Wanta received a
further document from the Wisconsin Tax Gestapo dated 16 January 2007,
entitled ‘NOTICE OF OVERDUE TAX’ for the increased sum of $46,119.21,
without any accompanying computation.

This document contained the following rubric: ‘If you think you do not
owe this amount or have any questions about this notice, please contact
Lisa Potts, PO Box 8901, Madison WI 53703-8901; Phone: (608) 267 0833; Fax: (608) 267-1037; Email: delnqtax@dor.state.wi.us.
Armed with this email address, the Editor of this service forwarded to
Lisa Potts the email from John Dipko, Public Information Director,
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, dated 10th November 2006,
referenced above, in which the Department of Corrections confirmed that
a cheque for $24,900.91 had been drawn in favour of the Wisconsin
Department of Revenue on 4th August 2005.

Since the Editor sent that email, nothing further had, of this posting
date, been heard of this component of the Wisconsin Tax Gestapo fraud
sequence against Ambassador Leo Wanta.

STYMIED ON THAT ONE, THEY PULL ANOTHER UNLAWFUL DEMAND
Unable to proceed further with that dimension of their fraudulent
activity, given the explicit confirmation in an email to a financial
journalist and Editor that the Department of Corrections had paid the
Department of Revenue $24,900.91 on 4th August 2005, the Wisconsin Tax
Gestapo resorted to another despicable ruse.

THREAT TO POST SUBSTITUTE CIVIL ASSESSMENT ON THE INTERNET
On 12th February 2007, Lisa Potts, Wisconsin Department of Revenue, PO
Box 8901, Madison WI 53708-8901 (same coordinates) issued a document
[ref: ID#5QJLF7VS] addressed to Leo Wanta asserting that a tax balance
of $897,375.07 was ‘due’. This document was entitled ‘NOTICE OF PENDING
INTERNET POSTING’. It threatened Leo Wanta in the following terms:

‘Your account will be posted on the Internet unless you do one of
the following within 30 days from the date of this Notice’ (‘Pay your
debt in full’, ‘Provide proof of payment’, ‘Enter into a formal
instalment agreement’, ‘Complete an offer of compromise’ or ‘Provide
proof of bankruptcy’).

STATE TAX THUGS WARNED OF RICO, LBEL, SLANDER ACTIONS
Following the further tax demand last year, a lawyer for Leo Wanta
informed the Wisconsin Department of Revenue that their illegal tax
assessment demands represent actionable behaviour under Federal
legislation against organised crime, including RICO. Following Lee’s
receipt on 15th February 2007 of the Wisconsin State Tax Gestapo’s’
‘Notice of Internet Posting’, the Attorney followed this up with a
letter indicating that publication of the false ‘delinquent tax’ demand
of $897,375.07 would constitute libel and slander against his client,
and would accordingly compound the legal vulnerability of the Wisconsin
Department of Revenue and its staff generally.

In addition, named officials of that tax Department, including Gregg T
Frazier and Lisa Potts, are vulnerable to prosecution under RICO
statutes, and for libel and slander against the Ambassador.

The background to this latest abomination is as follows. In the course
of his official duties working under cover for the FBI, Leo Wanta was
engaged many years ago in an FBI ‘sting’ operation against Falls
Vending Services, Inc., which was suspected of being used for unlawful
activities. He never owned any shares in Falls Vending, began working
there for the FBI on 26th June 1981, and at all times while working or
associated with Falls Vending Services his purpose concerned undercover
law enforcement activity, consistent with his parallel status at that
time as a sworn Deputy Sheriff of Waukesha County Sheriff’s Department.

However the Wisconsin Department of Revenue contrived to leverage this
ancient history into the format of a massive unlawful personal tax
liability against Leo Wanta, which it has brought forward from time to
time by way of harassment and intimidation so as to exacerbate Leo’s
suffering in the GULAG and thereafter.

In an undated letter labelled ‘State of Wisconsin v, Leo E. Wanta: Dane
County Circuit Court Case Number 92-CF-683’, to Judge Michael B Torphy,
Mr James E. Doyle, then Attorney General of Wisconsin and now Governor
of the State, wrote that ‘I have determined not to pursue having the
Court include the amount that defendant owes on his delinquent tax
account (7). The Department of Revenue will continue to avail itself of
whatever civil remedies it may have in its collection efforts. For the
Court’s information, the amount owed on defendant’s delinquent tax
account as of November 20, 1995, was $646, 918.91’.

This statement was bogus as no such liability for Wisconsin State tax
existed or exists on account for Leo Wanta, and/or Lee Emil Wanta.

GESTAPO CONFIRMS IN WRITING THAT WANTA IS A DIPLOMAT
On 18th February 1999, Angela Dunlap, Revenue Agent, State of the
Wisconsin Department of Revenue, 718 West Clairemont Avenue, Eau
Claire, WI 54701 [715-836 3879; Facsimile: 715-836 6891;email:adunlap@mail.state.wi.us],
wrote as follows to Attorney Jan Morton Heger, PO Box 4815, Irvine, CA
92616-4815, then a lawyer acting for Leo Wanta (and the operative who
placed Leo’s funds in his own name, at a bank in Aylesbury,
Buckinghamshire: see above), as follows:

’Dear Attorney Heger: The Department of Revenue has no record of a
delinquent tax account issued to Lee E. Wanta, Social Security Number
[correct Social Security number for Lee Wanta cited], Federal
Identification Number DPP#04362. Sincerely, [signed] Angela Dunlap,
Revenue Agent’. Note that DPP stands for DIPLOMATIC PASSPORT,
indicating that the Wisconsin Department of Revenue have been aware all
along that Leo Wanta is a diplomat, and is recognised as such by US
State and Federal authorities. This fact, of course, severely compounds
Wisconsin’s multiple errors, given that diplomats are protected from
arrest.

The fact alone that the reprobate Wisconsin Department of Revenue
documents its knowledge of Ambassador Wanta’s diplomatic status,
invalidates, from the outset, the entire unlawful operation to ‘take
down’ Leo Wanta, as perpetrated by the Wisconsin State tax authorities
who were and remain evident co-conspirators and accessories to the fact
of the frauds committed against Leo/Lee Emil Wanta, his person, his
assets and the Court.

08 MARCH 1999: A NEW DELINQUENT TAX ACCOUNT MATERIALISES
On 8th March 1999 – that is to say, just three weeks later, and while
Leo was languishing in the GULAG – the Wisconsin Department of Revenue
issued a ‘STATEMENT OF DELINQUENT TAX ACCOUNT’, reference 5QJLF7V5, for
a total ‘amount due’ of $754,839.58, against Leo Wanta, addressed to
the old private marital family residence that the Wisconsin criminal
authorities had long since stolen. This document added that interest
was accruing at the rate of $88.11 per day.

Please note that Leo’s Social Security Number (which of course we are
precluded from publishing, for obvious security reasons) was correctly
stated on both the letter from Angela Dunlap, of the WI Department of
Revenue, to Attorney Jan Morton Heger, and on this 'Statement of
Delinquent Account'. Therefore, of course, both the letter and the
Statement referred to the same account: so that on 18th February 1999,
no such Delinquent Tax Account existed, while three weeks later, a
Delinquent Tax Account against “Lee Emil Wanta”, the owner (obviously)
of the SAME Social Security Number, suddenly surfaced in the ‘amount
owed’ of $754,839.58.

Therefore on Monday, a Wisconsin State Tax Gestapo official says one
thing, and three weeks later, another Gestapo official says the
opposite. This is what happens under arbitrary rule, which is the norm,
it seems, in the State of Wisconsin, where the corrupt tax apparat is
used to harass and intimidate its victims so as to ‘legitimise’
institutionalised criminal extortion.

As indicated above, after the Editor faxed John Dipko’s email to Lisa
Potts, demands for the burgeoning civil tax assessment amount based
upon the original fraudulent demand of $14,129, settled under protest
three times, suddenly ceased – since Mr Dipko’s email had confirmed
that the Wisconsin Department of Corrections had indeed forwarded to
the Department of Revenue the sum of $24,900.91 that it was
(fraudulently) still claiming, and which was financed by means of the
check proffered to Michelle Riel on 21st July 2005 by Attorney Steven
Goodwin, as described.

Of course, the brutally uncouth Wisconsin Department of Revenue have
not had the courtesy to confirm to Leo Wanta or to his lawyer that they
duly received the $24,900.91 sent to them by the Wisconsin Department
of Corrections on 4th August 2005. However, manifestly they can proceed
no further with this fraud, since the Editor, Lee Wanta and his lawyer
possess the email from John Dipko confirming the Wisconsin Department
of Corrections’ payment of $24,900.91 dated 4th August 2005. (It is up
to the Department of Revenue to argue this out with the Department of
Corrections).

This will of course be one of the documents that will be relied upon in
a forthcoming RICO case against the Wisconsin Department of Revenue and
against named and unnamed officials both in their official capacities
and personally.

NO INTERNET POSTING ON THE LATEST UNLAWFUL TAX DEMAND
Having finally been thwarted (on the basis of information on this date
of posting) with respect to the Wisconsin Tax Gestapo’s attempts to
collect the civil tax assessment of $14,129 (plus extras) for a FOURTH
time, the Wisconsin Tax Gestapo reverted to its much larger fraudulent
civil tax assessment demand, which had now ballooned to $897,375.07 by
12th February [ID# 5QJLF7V5], threatening to post details of this
so-called ‘Delinquent Tax Assessment Account’ on the Internet within 30
days. The full thirty days had passed by the time this report had been
finalised, and this libellous and slanderous action had not been taken.

GROSS ABUSE OF POWERS LAYS OFFICIALS OPEN TO RICO SUITS
No doubt this reflects the fact that, all of a sudden, the Wisconsin
Department of Revenue, and its unnamed and named officials, including
Mr Gregg T. Frazier and Lisa Potts, may have become aware that the
scandalous misapplication and abuse of their powers is liable in due
course to result in them personally sampling the joys of the abominable
US GULAG, to which their reprobate behaviour condemned Ambassador Leo
Wanta for eight years, followed by effective house arrest and
probation, without cause and in breach of his diplomatic and human
rights.

That is what happens to high-level US intelligence operatives and
diplomats who serve Uncle Sam with extreme distinction and whose
ethical and moral code and upbringing precludes them from accommodating
corrupt high-level US intelligence operatives and top officials intent
on stealing, misdirecting, misusing, exploiting and otherwise abusing
financial assets held (by Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta) as sole Principal
and Trustor for the benefit exclusively of the United States and the
American people. Leo Wanta compounded the anger of high-level
operatives towards him when he refused to accommodate separate demands
from both Clinton and George Bush Sr. to facilitate the diversion of
funds in their favour, and after he had specifically annotated on one
Federal Reserve computer print-out that a remittance of $1.0 billion
from Banco Exterior de Espana, Malaga, Spain, to Banco de Panama,
Panama City, Panama for crediting to 'Pilgrim Investments/Jorge Bush'
represented a crime. Specifically, Leo had annotated this print-out as
follows:

'Acceptance of value by former U.S. President of the United
States, George (Jorge) Bush is direct violation of our USA Title 5,
Section 7353, et seq: Jim Baker III told me to just "SHUT UP" as I am
protected by Rogers-Houston Memorandum to "co-operate", but I kept
receipts & notes'. An image of this key Leo Wanta-annotated Federal
Reserve print-out has been extensively reproduced in International Currency Review, and may specifically be viewed in ICR, 31, 3/4, on page 33 [Figure 1].

YOU SERVED WITH EXTREME DISTINCTION? GO LANGUISH IN THE GULAG
There is no difference in principal between the fate unjustly suffered
by Ambassador Leo Wanta for years in the abominable US GULAG without
any cause, and that of the millions who suffered in the Soviet GULAG
under Stalin and his successors.

The only variant this time round is that the tables have been
decisively turned, since the whole informed world (minus the complacent
and controlled ‘mainstream’, or rather ‘sidestream’, media) is aware
that we are exposing elements of the biggest nexus of financial
scandals in world history.

And, as one US intelligence operative ‘working for’ George Bush Sr.
commented several years ago when these ongoing investigations were in
their infancy, ‘that is never supposed to happen, you understand’. Too
late now. The cat is out of the bag.

Notes and References:
(1) Marc Rich/Reich: Is he a DVD operative who is really ‘Hans Brand’?’, International Currency Review, Volume 31, 3/4, November 2006, pages 83-96.
(2) For background to our exposures of the biggest scorpions’ nest of
financial scandal in world history, see postings on this website since
April 2006, and the following issues of International Currency Review:
Volume 28, #4 (March 2003); Volume 30, 2/3 (January 2005); and Volume
31, 3/4, November 2006. The scandal has also been covered in issues of Economic Intelligence Review. See serials information on this website for subscription and serials ordering details.
(3) See International Currency Review, Volume 31, ¾, op. cit., pages 477 et seq.
(4) DVD: Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, Dachau, locus of the Nazi
long-range strategic deception continuum. DVD is a hidden (no longer!)
Pan-German ‘Black’ Nazi Continuum intelligence agency which is
masterminding much of the revolutionary instability in the world,
having acknowledged no strategic discontinuity since the Second World
(indeed since the days of Frederick the Great and Bismarck). Its
primary mantras are: ‘Fur uns ist der Krieg niemals vorbei’ (‘For us
the war never ended’); and ‘We shall build the Thousand-Year Reich on
the Ruins of the United States’. Documented authority for this is found
in the ‘Madrid Circular Letter’ intercepted by the Allies while en
route from the Madrid-based German Geopolitical Centre in the early
1950s, as well as other captured Nazi documents. Due to extensive
long-range Nazi penetration of the US structures, US intelligence
cadres are themselves extensively involved in seeking treasonous
implementation of these mad objectives. The good news is that these
people, though coldly cynical and ruthless, are incompetent, at
loggerheads with each other, and failing.
(5) Financial assets belonging to the sole Principal and Trustor,
Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta, were being held in the personal name of a
former Attorney for Leo Wanta, Jan Morton Heger, when the bank branch
in Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, UK, was visited at the Ambassador’s
request in 2006.
(6) ‘Thieves’ World’, Claire Sterling, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1994. See also International Currency Review,
Volume 31, 3/4, November 2006, page 186. Mrs Sterling died very
suddenly after a second interview with the FBI, following publication
of ‘Thieves’ World’. High-level sources have told the Editor that she
was murdered.
(7) Undated letter to The Honorable Michael B. Torphy from James E.
Doyle, then Wisconsin Attorney General and now Governor of Wisconsin,
cited on page 208 of International Currency Review, Volume 31, 3/4, Figure 16.

Tue Mar 6, 2007 2:53 pm (PST)

(1) a panel of federal citizens can not
legally issue a valid criminal INDICTMENT;
that panel was not a lawful federal grand jury
because the Jury Selection and Service Act
expressly discriminates against Citizens of
the 50 States of the Union:http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/opening.htm#topic-a

(2) for the same reason, a panel of federal
citizens could not legally issue a valid
VERDICT in a federal criminal trial, because
the same Jury Selection and Service Act
is used to convene federal trial juries too;

(7) those 50 States are already legally represented
by their respective State Attorneys General;

(8) as such, the "United States of America"
cannot be legally represented by any U.S. Attorneys
employed either by the U.S. Department of Justice
or by the Office of the U.S. Attorney:http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/547.html

(9) it is also willful misrepresentation for
any DOJ's officers or employees to attempt to appear
on behalf of the 50 States of the Union, or
on behalf of 2 revoked Delaware corporations;
such willful misrepresentation violates the
McDade Act at 28 U.S.C. 530B:http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/530B.html