New
Deoxyribonucleic acid: the chemical inside the nucleus of a cell that carries the genetic instructions for making living organisms.DNA Evidence Supports Multiregional Evolutionary Model?by Rich Deem

Introduction

Multiregional Evolutionary Theory?

Contrary to the claims of a recent study,
the multiregional model, which states that modern humans evolved from
several different groups of hominids (including Neanderthals) that
interbred at some point to produce modern humans, fails to explain the
genetics seen in modern humans, Neanderthals, and early modern humans. The
biblical model (stating that humans arose from one lineage from a single
geographic location) still fits all the data better than the multiregional
model.

Rich Deem

Two theories explaining the origin of humans are popular today among
evolutionists. The multiregional model states that modern humans evolved from
several different groups of hominids (including Neanderthals) that interbred at
some point to produce modern humans. The most widely supported theory states
that modern humans arose from a single geographic location from one lineage.
This theory, although evolutionary in nature, is similar the biblical creation
model. The authors of a new study out from "Down Under" (Australia)
claim that they have data supporting the multiregional model.

However, previous anatomical studies have cast doubt on the likelihood of
Neanderthals being the ancestors of modern humans (1-5). These
studies showed differences in Neanderthal's hands (1), the
brain case (2), and numerous other features of the Neanderthal
skull (3-5). Recent genetic studies comparing the
hypervariable (subject to a higher than average A permanent structural alteration in DNA, consisting of either a substitution, insertion or deletion of nucleotide bases.mutation rate than usual) region
of Genetic material found in mitochondria, the organelles that generate energy for the cell.mtDNA of Neanderthals to that of modern humans, suggest that they were
probably a separate species from modern humans (6-8). What has
been missing from the previous studies is a comparison of differences between
the genetic The order of nucleotides in a DNA or RNA molecule, or the order of amino acids in a protein molecule.sequence of living humans compared to ancient, anatomically modern
humans.

Ancient Anatomically Modern Aussies

The first study examining the Genetic material found in mitochondria, the organelles that generate energy for the cell.mtDNAThe order of nucleotides in a DNA or RNA molecule, or the order of amino acids in a protein molecule.sequences of ancient humans (10
anatomically modern Australians) was published in early 2001 (9).
Most of the ancient Australians were dated at less than 10,000 years old.
However, one specimen was dated at 40,000 years
old (redated from the original estimate of 62,000 years old, 10), which means that this
person lived before the Neanderthals that have already been Determining the order of nucleotides in a DNA or RNA molecule, or the order of amino acids in a protein molecule.sequenced. A
summary of the Genetic material found in mitochondria, the organelles that generate energy for the cell.mtDNAThe order of nucleotides in a DNA or RNA molecule, or the order of amino acids in a protein molecule.sequence differences of this individual (compared with the
modern human reference The order of nucleotides in a DNA or RNA molecule, or the order of amino acids in a protein molecule.sequence, modern Aboriginal humans, Neanderthals, and
chimpanzees) can be found in the table, below. The first
thing that one notices is that the The order of nucleotides in a DNA or RNA molecule, or the order of amino acids in a protein molecule.sequence variation of the ancient Australian
compared to modern humans is only 10 Two nucleotides on opposite complementary DNA or RNA strands that are connected via hydrogen bonds.base pairs. Previous studies have shown
that the average variation among population groups of modern humans is 8 base
pairs (the difference between humans and Neanderthals is 26 Two nucleotides on opposite complementary DNA or RNA strands that are connected via hydrogen bonds.base pairs, by
comparison). The exciting thing for those who believe in the creation model is
that the difference between the ancient Australian and Neanderthals included
only three shared bases. These results demonstrate that the human All the DNA contained in an organism or a cell, which includes both the chromosomes within the nucleus and the DNA in mitochondria.genome was
already nearly "modern" before Neanderthals died out.

The authors of the study made a big deal about the ancient Australian
The order of nucleotides in a DNA or RNA molecule, or the order of amino acids in a protein molecule.sequence sharing similarity to a portion of One of the threadlike "packages" of genes and other DNA in the nucleus of a cell. Different kinds of organisms have different numbers of chromosomes. Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes, 46 in all: 44 autosomes and two sex chromosomes. Each parent contributes one chromosome to each pair, so children get half of their chromosomes from their mothers and half from their fathers.chromosome 11 in modern humans
(thought to have been inserted into the human All the DNA contained in an organism or a cell, which includes both the chromosomes within the nucleus and the DNA in mitochondria.genome from the Genetic material found in mitochondria, the organelles that generate energy for the cell.mtDNA). The
authors concluded that the "loss" of the ancient Genetic material found in mitochondria, the organelles that generate energy for the cell.mtDNA variation seen
in ancient Australian could explain how Neanderthals do not share Genetic material found in mitochondria, the organelles that generate energy for the cell.mtDNA with
modern humans. Although it is certainly possible that part of Genetic material found in mitochondria, the organelles that generate energy for the cell.mtDNA might find
its way into nuclear Threadlike "packages" of genes and other DNA in the nucleus of a cell. Different kinds of organisms have different numbers of chromosomes. Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes, 46 in all: 44 autosomes and two sex chromosomes. Each parent contributes one chromosome to each pair, so children get half of their chromosomes from their mothers and half from their fathers.chromosomes, it doesn't address the issue of how the
variation seen in the Genetic material found in mitochondria, the organelles that generate energy for the cell.mtDNA of ancient Australian was "lost." In fact,
of the ten The order of nucleotides in a DNA or RNA molecule, or the order of amino acids in a protein molecule.sequence differences between the ancient Australian and the modern
human reference The order of nucleotides in a DNA or RNA molecule, or the order of amino acids in a protein molecule.sequence, five of those bases correspond to natural variations
found in modern Aboriginal people, showing that those five bases were not lost
at all. This leaves only a five base difference, certainly within the range of
variation found among modern humans. The authors' contention that an ancient
humans The order of nucleotides in a DNA or RNA molecule, or the order of amino acids in a protein molecule.sequence was "lost" is not supported by their data, since the
introduction of 5 Permanent structural alterations in DNA, consisting of either substitutions, insertions or deletions of nucleotide bases.mutations over a period of 40,000 years is not unreasonable,
but would, in fact, be expected in the region of Genetic material found in mitochondria, the organelles that generate energy for the cell.mtDNA that is subject to a high
A permanent structural alteration in DNA, consisting of either a substitution, insertion or deletion of nucleotide bases.mutation rate. Overall, the lack of "evolution" for humans over the
last 40,000 years stands in sharp contrast to the large differences seen between
modern humans and Neanderthals over the same period of time.

Genetic material found in mitochondria, the organelles that generate energy for the cell.mtDNA Sequence Variation of Ancient, Anatomically Modern Humans(9)

Genetic material found in mitochondria, the organelles that generate energy for the cell.mtDNA Sample
(HVR-1)

Addendum

A follow-up article on the claims of Adcock et al. appeared in the
journal Science in June, 2001.11
In this rebuttal, European evolutionists came to the same conclusions presented
here - that the conclusions of Adcock et al. were unwarranted and actually
contradicted by the data. They disputed the claim that these ancient
anatomically modern humans were genetically separated from modern humans,
saying, "These trees show that LM3 and KS8 are well within modern human
variation..." These evolutionists came to the same conclusions as myself,
as seen in their final comments:

Lastly, even if the problems with both the data and the analysis were
ignored, the phylogenetic tree of Adcock et al. would not support the
"multiregional model" for modern human origins, because all the
modern human The order of nucleotides in a DNA or RNA molecule, or the order of amino acids in a protein molecule.sequences are closely related to each other, whereas the
Neandertal The order of nucleotides in a DNA or RNA molecule, or the order of amino acids in a protein molecule.sequences form an outgroup. Consequently, to see the data of Adcock
et al. as a significant problem for the Out of Africa model seems an
exaggerated claim.11

More genetic studies

Recently, proponents of this theory have claimed that fossils show that an
archaic Homo erectus from Java shared key features with living Asians
and early modern humans in Australia. Their conclusion was that Asian H.
erectus passed on some of its Deoxyribonucleic acid: the chemical inside the nucleus of a cell that carries the genetic instructions for making living organisms.DNA to modern Australians and Asians (Science,
12 January 2001, p. 293).
A recent genetic analysis of Asians, however, explodes this theory.12
The study, examining more than 1000 Asian men, determined that all
of these men came from one source, between 35,000 and 89,000 years ago. The
study is so convincing that some multiregional evolutionists have now dropped
this theory. At the annual meeting of physical anthropologists in Kansas City,
Missouri, one self-described "dedicated multiregionalist," Vince
Sarich of the University of California, Berkeley, admitted:

"I have undergone a conversion--a sort of epiphany. There are no old Y
chromosome lineages [in living humans]. There are no old Genetic material found in mitochondria, the organelles that generate energy for the cell.mtDNA lineages.
Period. It was a total replacement."

Recent Find in Asia

A miniature hominin, named Homo floresiensis, only 1 meter tall
with a brain capacity only 20% of modern humans, has further discredited the
multiregional hypothesis. This creature is so unlike any other hominins that
it could not have contributed to our All the DNA contained in an organism or a cell, which includes both the chromosomes within the nucleus and the DNA in mitochondria.genome:

"Palaeoanthropological and genetic studies have already done much to
discredit this model, and H. floresiensis puts yet another (the
last?) nail in the multiregional coffin. Not only did H. floresiensis
evolve in the absence of The functional and physical unit of heredity passed from parent to offspring. Genes are pieces of DNA, and most genes contain the information for making a specific protein.gene exchange with other hominins, but no one
can argue that LB1 contributed to our own species' genetic make-up."13

Who Was Adam?: A Creation Model Approach to the Origin of Man. Are
humans just advanced apes or have they been specially created in the image of
God? Publications by scientists almost never ask the question, whereas
publications by theists seldom examine the scientific data that relates to the
question. However, two scientists raised in non-Christian homes, Fuz Rana (Ph.D.
in chemistry) and Hugh Ross (Ph.D. in astronomy), have written a new book (Who
Was Adam?: A Creation Model Approach to the Origin of Man) that examines
the question of human origins by comparing biblical and evolutionary models.

Adcock, G.J., E.S. Dennis, S. Easteal, G.A. Huttley, L.S.
Jermiin, W.J. Peacock, and A. Thorne. 2001. Of or referring to the mitochondria, the organelles that generate energy for the cell.MitochondrialDeoxyribonucleic acid: the chemical inside the nucleus of a cell that carries the genetic instructions for making living organisms.DNAThe order of nucleotides in a DNA or RNA molecule, or the order of amino acids in a protein molecule.sequences in
ancient Australians: Implications for modern human origins. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Science USA 98: 537-542.

Gibbons, A. 2001. Modern Men Trace Ancestry to African Migrants. Science
292: 1051-1052.
Yuehai Ke, et al. 2001. African Origin of Modern Humans in East Asia: A Tale
of 12,000 One of the two sex chromosomes that determines maleness in mammals, carried and passed down from males to males.Y chromosomes. Science 292: 1151-1153.