Thursday, September 25, 2008

Mother Kelly's Hypocrisy

"What exactly does Ruth Kelly think she's doing making her own childcare choices?

Surely she's not saying that it is appropriate for parents to decide how best to look after their children. If that's the case, why is the government taxing everybody to pay for its own preferred solution of parents working and putting the children (sorry,"kids") into institutionalised care?

If the government thought that parents were capable of making their own choices, they would have just given them a tax break or direct subsidy (or whatever) so that they could choose for themselves how best to provide care for children. But they didn't, because parents don't know best. Doesn't Ruth Kelly realise this?"

We take his point. Not only has Ms Kelly been a member of the cabinet for four years, but for half that time she was Education Secretary, directly in charge of state childcare.

She can hardly claim not to understand government childcare policy, the entire thrust of which has been 'wrap around' childcare, including extensive pre and after-school provision. Why, only yesterday, her successor Blinky Balls was banging on yet again about their massive expansion of nursery school places for two year-olds (eg see here).

What is wrong with Ms Kelly?

BOM believes she is a danger to society. She should be arrested and despatched to a state parenting skills re-education facility soonest.

****

We're currently spending £43bn pa on state childcare (aka state schools), and a further £2.3bn on "Children and families" (Sure Start etc). It is all directed by the Commissariat, with parents having no meaningful say whatsoever.

Not unless they have money, that is. Ruth Kelly herself - like many Labour hypocrites down the years - is quite happy to buy private education for her own children.

1 comment:

BOM the book now available

Drawing on six years of blogging government waste, this book shows how we spend far more than we need on our public services. It sets out the facts and explores the underlying issues. Just why does government spend so much and deliver such second rate service? Why do we put up with it? And what are the alternatives?

ABOUT BOM

Despite all the talk of cuts, government still consumes nearly half our national income. Yet many tens of billions of its spending is wasted, with taxpayers made to pick up the tab for a depressing array of overpriced sub-standard services. This is money we can no longer afford, and our National Debt is already at danger level.

If we're to avoid further decades of stagnation and austerity we urgently need to find another way. Exposing and understanding the wastefulness of government is a necessary step in the right direction.