Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view

On Mar 14, 9:19 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Bernard Peek wrote:> > On 2007-03-14, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:>> >>The word "object" is essentially meaningless.>> > The word, in the context of object-oriented languages and databases, seems> > to me to have precisely two meanings. One is the set of identifiable things> > and the other is the set of computer-based models of identifiable things.>> Huh?

I didn't think that you'd like that answer :-)
>> > It does impede communication, but it's not for want of trying. I think it's the> > universality of the concept that may be at the heart of the problem.>> Um, are you saying that if it means everything and anything then it> means nothing?>