Then you have a filter in place and you need to spot it and correct it.

You can certainly make the argument that there is more needed to be definitive and perhaps in time that will happen.

But to see nothing indicates you cannot see what is in front of you, and you should be concerned about that. I know you’re being honest here, but in all respects your perception is skewed and as an adult that should alarm you. Reality should not be optional, nuance should be.

You’ve remarked on it in at least three occasions and characterized it as it as being indicative that’s Stines offenses are somehow less serious than if he had powered bail.

So what does posting bond versus posting bail mean to you? What is the difference? What is it indicative of?

Nothing, since you won’t answer because you don’t even know and are about to start dancing like MC Hammer.

I don’t see the bail question as so much about the seriousness of the crime as more to do with the seriousness of the Eliot Ness like arrest. Here’s this guy who has to be taken down with heavy weapons and flak jackets before he gets to some serious weaponage or flys the scene in a getaway car. They’re after him like machine gun Kelly. As soon as he hits jail…enh…let him go.
It just shows what a melodrama was put on for political reasons
This is supposed to be an investigation, not opposition research.

I don’t see the bail question as so much about the seriousness of the crime as more to do with the seriousness of the Eliot Ness like arrest. Here’s this guy who has to be taken down with heavy weapons and flak jackets before he gets to some serious weaponage or flys the scene in a getaway car. They’re after him like machine gun Kelly. As soon as he hits jail…enh…let him go.
It just shows what a melodrama was put on for political reasons
This is supposed to be an investigation, not opposition research.

The seriousness of the charges matches the professionalism of the arrest.

Guaranteed the FBI taped the entire thing. Roger Stone won’t want us to hear that, we’ll hear how gentle and polite they were to him.

“There were no expenditures that weren’t approved by Mr. Trump himself,” said Stone, who started working for Trump in the 1980s. “He saw the ads, television ads, which he would see on a video machine, radio ads, you play on a tape recorder, or newspaper ads, which he would see the artwork for.”