Power accuracy at specified frequency and phase angle

Introduction

The practical measurement of power is influenced by a number of factors which can introduce inaccuracies. Power analyzer manufacturers, including N4L, usually quote a simplified expression for power accuracy to allow computation of the realistic measurement uncertainty to be expected. In some applications, it may be useful to follow a more detailed process in order to more accurately quantify the worst case theoretical measurement uncertainty under specific conditions of frequency and power factor.

Analysis

Consider the power dissipated in a load with the following conditions:

Note that at as power factor tends to zero (θ tends to 90˚) the uncertainty becomes dominated by the cos(θ±δθ) / cosθ term. As these error terms are independent of each other, they may move the result in either direction:

δW / W = ± (δV / V) ± (δA / A) + (cos(θ±δθ) / cosθ – 1)

Expressing the terms as percentage errors:

Werror% = ± Verror% ± Aerror% + (cos(θ±δθ) / cosθ – 1) x 100%

Note that this analysis is a first order approximation assuming that the errors are relatively small.

Application

From the measurement the following information should be noted:

1. Voltage fundamental magnitude (or rms if sinewave)

2. Current fundamental magnitude (or rms if sinewave)

3. Phase angle

4. Frequency

It may also be necessary to note the voltage and current measurement ranges.

From the manufacturers specification compute:

1. The percentage uncertainty in the voltage measurement at the applied voltage, frequency and voltage measurement range: V%.

2. The percentage uncertainty in the current measurement at the applied current, frequency and current measurement range: A%

3. The phase uncertainty at the applied frequency: δθ

Then the percentage watts error, W%, is given by

W% = V% + A% + (cos(θ±δθ) / cosθ – 1) x 100%

Complex waveforms

This analysis is valid only for sinusoidal waveforms. Because the total power with a complex waveform is the result of the sum of the power of the individual harmonics, it is possible to apply this analysis to complex waveforms by repeating the computation for as many harmonics as desired and then combining the results. Consider an application with a complex waveform such that only the fundamental, 3rd and 5th harmonics are significant. Then:

Wtotal = W1 + W3 + W5

where: Wtotal = total power

W1 = fundamental power

W3 = 3rd harmonic power

W5 = 5th harmonic power

The accuracy of the power measurement for each of the harmonics can be computed individually using the procedure above. The total power measurement error then would be given by:

W% = (W1% x W1 + W3% x W3 + W5% x W5) / (W1 + W3 + W5)

Practical considerations

The result of this analysis gives a worst case error if all the errors of voltage, current and phase are at their worst simultaneously and in the same direction. In practice the simpler formula published in various forms by most manufacturers is a more empirical approach to quantifying power measurement uncertainty. However, the measurement uncertainty of voltage, current and phase on an instrument can be traceably quantified and the calibration certificate supplied with each instrument should be checked by the user to verify that these basic measurements are well within their specification over the whole frequency range of the instrument.