Callahan and O'Connor have an outstanding edited collection out soon from OUP:

Description:Is religious faith consistent with being an intellectually virtuous thinker?In seeking to answer this question, one quickly finds others, each of which has been the focus of recent renewed attention by epistemologists: What is it to be an intellectually virtuous thinker? Must all reasonable belief be grounded in public evidence? Under what circumstances is a person rationally justified in believing something on trust, on the testimony of another, or because of the conclusions drawn by an intellectual authority? Can it be reasonable to hold a belief on a topic over which there is significant, entrenched disagreement among informed inquirers, or should such disagreement lead all parties to modify or suspend their own judgments? Is there anything about faith that exempts it from measurement against such epistemic norms? And if we would so evaluate it, how exactly should we understand the intellectual commitments faith requires?

Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post messages. Log in to your account to enable posting, or contact the JB Administrator to request being added to the Participant list.