Re: Initial impressions of DFly

:> extract is somewhat noticeable, though for both OSes it is much more
:> noticeable on builds, though DFly performs better, subjectively, versus
:> - -CURRENT (with ULE). Even SCHED_BSD felt a little slower, however.
:
:ULE is fairly broken in a lot of workloads and should not be used for
:performance comparisons unless you're also going to benchmark
:SCHED_4BSD.
:
:Kris
Note that DragonFly's current scheduler is also somewhat broken when it
comes to music skips in the face of batch operations. It's a known issue
that we will tackle after 1.0.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>