March 26, 2014

Conventional theorists are puzzled by the inverse density gradient in white dwarf stars. But not those of us who work with the Reciprocal System of theory! From Dewey B. Larson’s The Universe of Motion, p. 178:

“The phenomenon that we are now considering, the existence of helium
atmospheres in certain classes of white dwarf stars, is a more limited example
of the same kind of anticipation of the observational discoveries. Here the
explanation was provided before the need for it was recognized. The essential
feature of this explanation is the inverse density gradient. The existence of this
inverse gradient is not an ad hoc assumption that has been formulated to fit the
observations, in the manner of so many of the “ explanations” offered by
conventional theory. It is something that is definitely required by the basic
postulates of the theory of the universe of motion, and was so recognized, and
set forth in the published works, long before the existence of the helium
atmospheres was reported by the observers, and the need for an explanation of
this seeming anomaly became evident. The 1959 publication stated
specifically that ‘The center of a white dwarf star is the region of lowest
density.’

“Once the existence of the inverse density gradient was recognized, the
presence of helium atmospheres in the older white dwarf stars could have been
deduced, independently of any observations, if the investigations had been
extended into more detail. This was not feasible as a part of the original
project, because of the limited amount of time that could be allocated to
astronomical studies in an investigation covering the fundamentals of all major
branches of physical science. The answer to the problem of the helium
concentration was, however, available for immediate use as soon as the
problem was specifically recognized. In the pages that follow, this experience
will be repeated time and time again. We will encounter a long succession of
recent discoveries— some of a minor character, like the helium atmospheres;
others that have a major significance to astronomy—and we will find simple
and logical explanations of these discoveries ready and waiting in the physical
principles that were previously derived from the postulates of the theory of the
universe of motion.”

Obviously the presence of metals in the atmosphere, rather than in the core, of white dwarfs is thus obvious!

March 18, 2014

The conventional theorists are now jumping to the conclusion that these tiny fluctuations in the CMBR prove “inflation”–the greater than light speed of the expansion right after the alleged “Big Bang.” This is, of course, nonsense. In the Reciprocal System of theory, the CMBR is due to the radiation from the other half of the universe, the cosmic sector. This sector is localized in coordinate time, whereas our sector, the material sector, is localized in coordinate space. The radiation from the cosmic sector is isotropic in our sector, which makes it very nearly homogeneous. But, of course, there will be minor fluctuations in this radiation, just as there are minor fluctuations in the energy output of our own Sun from day to day. The conventional theorists actually believe that all of the mass-energy of the universe was concentrated into a “dot” smaller than the size of an atom right before the alleged “Big Bang.” This is breathlessly illogical! The Reciprocal System posits that the space-time progression is the real cause for the expansion of the universe, not any alleged “Big Bang.” If there were a creation of space-time, radiation, and matter, the original entitities were widely dispersed. Study the Reciprocal System and prove it for yourself. https://transpower.wordpress.com

March 10, 2014

Dark matter–ha, ha. Gamma rays and x-rays come from mass to energy conversion. There is no “black hole” or “dark matter” in our galactic center. What exists there is a “white dwarf core,” in which the atoms have reached their upper age limit and so are self-destructing, converting mass to energy. See Dewey B. Larson’s astrophysical work, The Universe of Motion, for the details.

March 4, 2014

In conventional theory, stars with the mass of our Sun eventually become Red Giants, which eventually become White Dwarfs, which eventually become Black Dwarfs. In the Reciprocal System, however, stars like our Sun slowly move up the Main Sequence, eventually explode in a supernova, which creates a Red Giant / White Dwarf pair, or a Red Giant / Planetary System. The Red Giant then decreases in size and increases in mass, to become a Red Dwarf. This Red Dwarf then slowly moves up the Main Sequence, and the cycle repeats. Therefore, it is not a surprise to us that there are so many Red Dwarf / Planetary Systems. Half of all stars in our Galaxy are members of binary (or multiple) star systems. The other half are divided between individual stars and solar systems (like ours).

March 1, 2014

The problem here is that conventional theory says that supernovae type Ia are due to the transfer of matter from one star of a binary system to its white dwarf companion. This is dead wrong. White dwarfs do explode, but that’s due to another cause, and the result is a nova, not a supernova. Actual type Ia supernovae are due to reaching a temperature or mass limit, in which a portion of the iron core is converted into energy. Please read Dewey B. Larson’s astonomical masterpiece, The Universe of Motion.