There can be only one reason liberals instinctively call conservatives racists. Like Pavlov's dogs, they have been conditioned to do so by their masters in the Democrat-media complex.

Ivan Petrovich Pavlov was a Russian scientist who won the Nobel Prize in 1904 for his studies of the digestive system. While studying the impact of saliva on digestion, he noticed that his test subjects - dogs - salivated even when there was no food present. Eventually, he realized the dogs were responding to the lab coats worn by his assistants. He expanded his experiments to determine the reason.

...

His findings proved useful in a variety of ways, such as anti-phobia treatment, as nobelprize.org explains:

Conditioning forms the basis of much of learned human behavior. Nowadays, this knowledge has also been exploited by commercial advertising. An effective commercial should be able to manipulate the response to a stimulus (like seeing a product's name) which initially does not provoke any feeling. The objective is to train people to make the "false" connection between positive emotions (e.g. happiness or feeling attractive) and the particular brand of consumer goods being advertised.

In the same way, liberals who get all their "news" or opinion from networks like MSNBC, hear nothing but anti-conservative propaganda. All they ever hear is the party line that conservatives are stupid, evil, racist spawn of the Devil.

Eventually, all that is needed is the mention of the name 'Palin' or 'Beck' and the conditioning takes over.

For example, a Florida man received more than two years in prison for threatening a Republican Congresswoman. At his sentencing, he told the judge he watched too much MSNBC.

I hate all communists equally of all races. I think that there may be a higher percent of Black Communists here though. But not as many as the White Communists. The race I do not really care about. But all races tend to make fun of other races. However only conservatives can actually be racist with the new PC definition. Is making fun of other races nice...No. But normal...yes.

7
posted on 05/29/2011 9:12:36 AM PDT
by screaminsunshine
(Socialism...Easier said than done.)

1) projection. Liberals are far more concerned with race than are conservatives and

2)self-interest, Without “racism” Dems are notthing. The white liberals can’t feel morally superior to the REpublican Neanderthals, the black liberals can’t stick it to “The Man” to the tune of trillions of dollars.

The Jewish liberals, well I never have figure out what was in it for them. But, the more religious they actually are, the more likely they are not to be liberals.

But basically, all liberals are sons and daughters of the Prince of Lies, and that’s why they tell such whoppers.

12
posted on 05/29/2011 9:30:56 AM PDT
by chesley
(Eat what you want, and die like a man.)

Yes....Pavlov worked closely with Lenin. His ideas, through Watson and many others have been injected into textbooks—and later the behaviorism of BF Skinner. Eakmon writes about the educational system and so does Gato in his The Underground History of American Education and spells it out.

It is quite sinister and evil actually. (Dewey had “good” intentions since he was an avowed socialist. When he saw the results of his design, I think he lamented at the end of his life because of the curricula that was just complete brainwashing.)

Our text books for our children was injected with psychology to create group think—one correct response—by the Prussian design of the schools set up by Dewey using Pavlovian science.

He also managed to get younger and younger children away from parents so their “plastic minds” could be shaped easier. They didn’t want kids who had a strong individualistic Christian worldview. Communists such as Dr. Ruggs and Dr. Counts wrote hundreds of textbooks in America in the 30’s and were later “caught” by some concerned Congressmen but the conditioning in the public school system remained and got total control over all the children with the establishment of DOE.

The total transformation of worldview from the Protestant ethics of individualism and responsibility for actions to one of mass conformity which resulted in the “sexual revolution” was staggering...and planned.

Mass conformity of all the young people to moral relativism/atheism—if it feels good do it—in complete disregard for all aspects of what really creates the Good Life and true happiness which is the only method to have freedom—a responsible, virtuous people....understood for thousands of years in philosophy since Hellenic times and particularly by the Founders of the US.

Lenin knew how to destroy a virtuous people. His first act was to destroy the marriage contract and create forced daycare, so he could get complete control of all the children. The family unit with the mother able to spend lots of time to teach and nurture children and transfer culture—ideas of responsibility and ethics —is profound to the emotional and intellectual development of children. It is the safest and leads to high self esteem and individualism—the importance of oneself and particularly a belief in God, if there is to be one.

The early years determine worldview—relationship with the mother and father is crucial for an emotional healthy person which will determine happiness and successful interactions in all relationships—which determines all actions, values and philosophy of life.

Once they voted for obama, they can finally delude themselves they’re NOT racist but here in Hollywood, every white person only hangs out with another white person, and same with mexicans etc. That’s the way it is, not the way it should be.

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.