THE THREAT OF WAR WITH SYRIA AND THE PACIFIC RIM TRADE AGREEMENTS TPP ARE THE MOST PRESSING POLITICAL ISSUES.....JOIN THESE MOVEMENTS TO ACTIVATE AND ORGANIZE.

STOP ALLOWING THE US GOVERNMENT AT ALL LEVELS IGNORE RULE OF LAW....DOMESTICALLY AND INTERNATIONALLY. We know the US cannot legally attack Syria for the reasons it gives and we know the Trade agreements in TPP are illegal and a COUP against the US Constitution and American citizens!

I press anti-war activists to shout out the connection between the war in Syria and the desire of Israel to go to war with Iran. We all know that the US attack on Syria would bring Iran into the fight and there you have it....this is why nations all around the world would not follow Obama into this war with Syria over the use of chemical weapons by Assad on his own people because people understand that it could just as likely have been Israel using the gas to start a war with Iran.

The most dangerous war stance for the US is the one that has politicians standing with Israel if Israel attacks Iran. We know it is building and this stance is the one we need to shout against. All Maryland neo-liberals stand with Israel.

The Pledge of Resistance-Baltimore usually meets on Mondays at 7:30 PM, and the meetings take place at Max’s residence. There will be a meeting on Mon., Sept. 16. The proposed agenda will include preventing an attack on Syria, anti-drone activities, the next visit to the NSA on Sat., Oct. 5, the trial of the CIA Six and the third Wednesday visit to Rep. Sarbanes’ office. Call 410-366-1637 or email mobuszewski at verizon.net for directions. To be continued. Donations can be sent to the Baltimore Nonviolence Center, 325 E. 25th St., Baltimore, MD 21218. Ph: 410-366-1637; Email: mobuszewski [at] verizon.net. Go to http://baltimorenonviolencecenter.blogspot.com/. "The master class has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles. The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while the subject class has had nothing to gain and everything to lose--especially their lives." Eugene Victor Debs

Secretary of State John Kerry and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov of Russia, right, shook hands on Saturday after making statements following meetings regarding Syria in Geneva. By MICHAEL R. GORDON Published: September 14, 2013

GENEVA — The United States and Russia reached a sweeping agreement on Saturday that called for Syria’s arsenal of chemical weapons to be removed or destroyed by the middle of 2014 and indefinitely stalled the prospect of American airstrikes. The joint announcement, on the third day of intensive talks in Geneva, also set the stage for one of the most challenging undertakings in the history of arms control. “This situation has no precedent,” said Amy E. Smithson, an expert on chemical weapons at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies. “They are cramming what would probably be five or six years’ worth of work into a period of several months, and they are undertaking this in an extremely difficult security environment due to the ongoing civil war.” Although the agreement explicitly includes the United Nations Security Council for the first time in determining possible international action in Syria, Russia has maintained its opposition to any military action. But George Little, the Pentagon press secretary, emphasized that the possibility of unilateral American military force was still on the table. “We haven’t made any changes to our force posture to this point,” Mr. Little said. “The credible threat of military force has been key to driving diplomatic progress, and it’s important that the Assad regime lives up to its obligations under the framework agreement.” In Syria, the state news agency, SANA, voiced cautious approval of the Russian and American deal, calling it “a starting point,” though the government issued no immediate statement about its willingness to implement the agreement. In any case, the deal was at least a temporary reprieve for President Bashar al-Assad and his Syrian government, and it formally placed international decision-making about Syria into the purview of Russia, one of Mr. Assad’s staunchest supporters and military suppliers. That reality was bitterly seized on by the fractured Syrian rebel forces, most of which have pleaded for American airstrikes. Gen. Salim Idris, the head of the Western-backed rebels’ nominal military command, the Supreme Military Council, denounced the initiative. “All of this initiative does not interest us. Russia is a partner with the regime in killing the Syrian people,” he told reporters in Istanbul. “A crime against humanity has been committed, and there is not any mention of accountability.” An immediate test of the viability of the accord will come within a week, when the Syrian government is to provide a “comprehensive listing” of its chemical arsenal. That list is to include the types and quantities of Syria’s poison gas, the chemical munitions it possesses, and the location of its storage, production and research sites. “The real final responsibility here is Syrian,” a senior Obama administration official said of the deal. Speaking at a joint news conference with his Russian counterpart, Secretary of State John Kerry said that “if fully implemented, this framework can provide greater protection and security to the world.” If Mr. Assad fails to comply with the agreement, the issue would be referred to the United Nations Security Council, where the violations would be taken up under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, which authorizes punitive action, Mr. Kerry said. Foreign Minister Sergey V. Lavrov of Russia made clear that his country, which wields a veto in the Security Council, had not withdrawn its objections to the use of force. If the Russians objected to punishing Syrian noncompliance with military action, however, the United States would still have the option of acting without the Security Council’s approval. “If diplomacy fails, the United States remains prepared to act,” President Obama said in a statement. The issue of removing Syria’s chemical arms broke into the open on Monday when Mr. Kerry, at a news conference in London, posed the question of whether Mr. Assad could rapidly be disarmed, only to state that he did not see how it could be done. Less than a week later, what once seemed impossible has become a plan — one that will depend on Mr. Assad’s cooperation and that will need to be put in place in the middle of a fierce conflict. To reach the agreement, arms control officials on both sides worked into the night, a process that recalled treaty negotiations during the cold war. Mr. Kerry and Mr. Lavrov held a marathon series of meetings on Friday, including a session that ended at midnight. On Saturday morning, the two sides reconvened with their arms control experts on the hotel pool deck as they pored over the text of the agreement. Obama administration officials say Russia’s role is critical since it has been a major backer of the Assad government, and the American assumption is that much, if not all, of the accord has Mr. Assad’s assent. At the United Nations, Ban Ki-moon, the secretary general, pledged to support the agreement, and he announced that Syria had also formally acceded to the international Chemical Weapons Convention, effective Oct. 14. In his statement, Mr. Obama called the use of chemical weapons “an affront to human dignity and a threat to the security of people everywhere.” “We have a duty to preserve a world free from the fear of chemical weapons for our children,” he said. “Today marks an important step towards achieving this goal.” Foreign Secretary William Hague of Britain issued a statement after a call with Mr. Kerry in which he welcomed the agreement on Syrian chemical weapons as a “a significant step forward.” It was a British parliamentary vote against military action that dampened momentum by the United States, France and Britain to conduct airstrikes in the wake of an August chemical strike in Syria. “The priority must now be full and prompt implementation of the agreement, to ensure the transfer of Syria’s chemical weapons to international control,” Mr. Hague said. Under the agreement, titled “Framework for Elimination of Syrian Chemical Weapons,” an inspection of the chemical weapons sites identified by the Syrian government must be completed by November. Equipment for producing chemical weapons and filling munitions with poison gas must be destroyed by November. The document also says there is to be “complete elimination of all chemical weapons material and equipment in the first half of 2014.” A priority under the agreement reached Saturday is to take steps to preclude or diminish the Assad government’s ability to employ chemical weapons before they are destroyed. An American official said such steps could include burning the least volatile component of binary weapons, a type of chemical agent that becomes potent only when separate elements are mixed. Another way to disable at least part of Syria’s stockpile, the official said, would be to destroy the equipment for mixing the binary component or destroying the munitions or bombs that would be filled with chemical agents. An American official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity under State Department protocol, said the United States and Russia had agreed that Syria has 1,000 tons of chemical weapons, including sarin and mustard gas. The United States believes at least 45 sites in Syria are associated with its chemical weapons program. Nearly half of these have “exploitable quantities” of chemical weapons, though the American official said the Assad government may have moved some of the agents. The American official said there was no indication that any of Syria’s chemical stocks had been moved to Iraq or Lebanon, as the Syrian opposition had charged. “We believe they are under regime control,” the official said. Russia has not accepted the American data on the number of chemical weapons sites. The difference may reflect the larger disagreement as to who was responsible for an Aug. 21 attack that the United States says killed at least 1,400 civilians, many of them women and children. If the Russians were to agree both on the number of chemical weapons sites and that the sites are all in government-controlled areas, that would suggest that the Assad government was culpable for the attack, and not the rebel forces as the Russians have asserted. The four-page framework agreement, including its technical annexes, is to be incorporated in a Security Council resolution that is to be adopted in New York. One concern in carrying out the deal, however, involves how to protect international inspectors who go to Syria. There will be no cease-fire so the inspectors can carry out their work. Asked whether rebels would aid the inspectors, General Idris, the Western-backed rebel military commander, called the issue “complicated,” saying, “If investigators come, we will facilitate the mission.” He said there were no chemical weapons in rebel-controlled areas, adding: “I don’t know if this will just mean that investigators will pass through the regions that are under rebel control. We are ready.” The sense of betrayal among nominally pro-Western factions in the opposition has grown intensely in recent days. In the northern Syrian province of Idlib, a rebel stronghold, one commander said that the agreement on Saturday proved that the United States no longer cared about helping Syrians and was leaving them at the mercy of a government backed by powerful allies in Russia and Iran. Maysara, a commander of a battalion in Saraqeb, said in an interview that he had paid little attention to the diplomacy on Saturday. “I don’t care about deals anymore,” he said in an interview. “The Americans found a way out of the strike.” He added: “The Russians did what they want. The Americans lied, and believed their own lie — the U.S. doesn’t want democracy in Syria. Now I have doubts about the U.S. capacities, their military and intelligence capacities. The Iranian capacity is much stronger, I guess.” _____________________________________________

Regarding the Immigration Bill and TPP:

If labor and justice are not shouting that the current Immigration Bill is bad for domestic and immigrant workers,.....it is just part of TPP.....they are not working for you and me.

MAKE SURE LABOR LEADERS ARE NOT WORKING WITH NEO-LIBERALS BUT RUNNING AGAINST THEM IN PRIMARIES!

Why are we seeing immigrant groups and labor groups supporting the Immigration bill? As the article below shows, the Hispanics you see in media supporting the bill are working with neo-liberals in the same ways the NAACP is working with them. Those made wealthy from the MLK movement for labor and justice policies War on Poverty and New Deal are now working to dismantle it because they are driven by money and not justice. This is why in Maryland you see rampant worker abuse and outright wage theft by the very minority contractors employing immigrant and black workers. Casa de Maryland and the NAACP will be found at Baltimore Development/Federal Reserve meetings and backing their politicians like O'Malley and Rawlings-Blake, but not so much at Fair Development rallies.

We want people of color and women to see how those who are now losing their rights in the NEW ECONOMY as the post-massive corporate fraud moving tens of trillions of dollars to the top earners is now called.......now have members joining the neo-liberals in dismantling our social democratic society. The NEW ECONOMY or NEW AMERICA simply means 'we have all the money now and this is how the rest of you will live'. If you look at the leaders in politics for Hispanics and blacks they call themselves NEW AMERICANS not because of the citizenship issue, but because of the neo-liberal issues.

Immigration reform that came from the Senate is simply a precursor of the TPP...it is market-based and meant to offer corporations what they need to be most profitable and the expense of citizens around the world AND NO LABOR AND JUSTICE ORGANIZATION CAN SUPPORT IT!

FlushTheTPP.org is an action campaign to Stop the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).

Carwash Workers and Capitol Hill: Immigration in Limbo - Working In These Timesinthesetimes.comTHAT'S WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT....BUT WHY ARE WE HEARING IT NOW AND NOT YEARS AGO AND WHY ARE UNION LEADERSHIPS BACKING WHAT THEY KNOW IS BAD FOR DOMESTIC AND IMMIGRANT LABOR?

The proposed immigration reform bill will only add to the criminalization of immigrants and the militarization of the border - and put citizenship out of reach for up to two-thirds of undocumented people.We need a ROC-Baltimore and our labor unions to adopt this model into their own restructuring!

ROC-NY works to build power and win justice among restaurant workers who face exploitative and abusive workplaces. Through a combination of worker organizing and leadership, litigation, and public pressure, ROC-NY has won back wages and discrimination claims for restaurant workers across the City in addition to other important workplace policy changes that directly improve conditions. Our Workplace Justice Committee is made up of members who provide support for our organizing work and help educate other workers about the need to take collective action in order to change conditions in the restaurant industry. Members learn organizing skills and gain knowledge about labor law. The Workplace Justice Committee is an opportunity for restaurant workers to play a vital role in building a vibrant workers' movement for social change. For more information, or to join the Workplace Justice Committee, email john@rocny.org.