But as would be expected, the M'kini report included DAP propaganda from the Rocket Bullshit Assholes master, Lim Guan Eng.

Firstly, this remark,

"DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng called on the government to adopt financial reform, pointing out that Malaysia is fifth in the world in illicit capital outflow, with US$291 billion (RM927 billion) siphoned out between 2000-2009"

This is what the NYT reported,

The people who accepted Liberty Reserve’s currency were “overwhelmingly criminal in nature,” according to the indictment.

“They included, for example: traffickers of stolen credit card data and personal identity information; peddlers of various types of online Ponzi and get-rich-quick schemes; computer hackers for hire; unregulated gambling enterprises; and underground drug-dealing Web sites,” according to the indictment.

Clearly, the NYT report is far distinct from what Lim Guan Eng attempts to imply. Lim Guan Eng is adept at exploiting an unrelated issues arising for political mileage.

I will address the matter of illicit outflows later.

Then we have the usual BN bashing,

"The time has come for the BN federal government to stop being in denial by adopting genuine financial reforms to clean up and stop such criminal activities of illicit outflow of ‘black money’ and money-laundering"

My tit for tat. Which race comes immediately to mind at some (or most) of the criminal activities in Malaysia as stated in the NYT report above?

LGE then proceeds to take on Bank Negara Malaysia,

"Otherwise, there is no point in winning accolades for Bank Negara or for our purported good running of the economy when the real issues of transparency and accountability are not addressed"

As far as transparency and accountability is concerned, just click this BNM link and I call upon LGE to publish the audit findings of his party's fraud reported elections which catapaulted the only Malay into their select CEC.

Now about that oft opposition bandied and repeated, illicit outflows by GFI.

The report estimated that 80% of the unrecorded financial outflows in Malaysia amounting to USD227.1 billion during the period of 2001-2010 were due to trade mispricing. However, unrecorded financial flows which are derived by comparing import and export data between countries also arise due to data discrepancies and the varying conventions used to compile trade statistics among countries. This includes time lag, variations in valuation and exclusion of certain types of goods. The situation is further complicated by the treatment of goods that are exported via re-export hubs. Exports by Malaysia to a specific trading partner may for example not give rise to a similar number recorded as total imports from Malaysia by that country. This discrepancy arises as the imports are recorded based on country of origin that also includes those exports that are via other countries. After taking into account Malaysia’s trade that is exported via Singapore and Hong Kong (re-export hubs), the estimate of trade mispricing between Malaysia and its top 10 trading partners were reduced significantly by about 70%.Since the estimates in the report of trade mispricing do not take into consideration such discrepancies in trade statistics, the estimates of illicit flows are overstated.

Compare the following with BNM's press statement in the matter also with relevant passages highlighted,

Once reexports from Hong Kong are included in the analysis, the hidden flows from exports decline to close to zero, even becoming negative in some years. The revised estimates are dramatically lower. Between 2002 and 2011, we estimate that the average of annual outflows has been of $78 billion—4 times less than the GFI estimate.

Not only are the flows of illicit capital much lower, but they are also less pernicious than the GFI study makes them out to be. The GFI study fails to distinguish the illicit aspect of flows (where tax and regulator avoidance are the main objectives) from outright capital flight (which emerges when there are expectations of crisis and a need to reduce one’s exposure to the country).

In this context, while it is certainly useful to identify and estimate illicit flows, GFI’s statement that “social, political, and economic order is not sustainable in the long run given such massive illicit outflows” seems like hyperbole. Chinese illicit outflows are much smaller than the GFI report indicates and a considerable percentage end up back in China in the form of foreign direct investment.

No wonder Lim Guan Eng is miffed with Bank Negara Malaysia and the BN government.

BNM had come out with an apt reply in the illicit outflow matter and BNM deserves its accolades for being a responsible, efficient and professional government instituition.

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Here now is a classic example of a DUMB urbanite in the shape of Bersih steering committee member, Maria Chin Abdullah.

We all know she is not alone among, and I don't mind saying, hundreds of thousands "educated" urbanites who choose not to believe or accept facts.

With the greatest of respect to the Chairman and Deputy Chairman (and members) of the Election commission, as I told my closest cousin just yesterday, are appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong in consultation with the Conference of Rulers by virtue of Article 114 of the Federal Constitution and befitting their status should not waste their time accomodating the opposition and all their unsubstantiated allegations of "fraud".

As they have said over and over again there are legal remedies and recourse for any dispute of the election results.

But the opposition and their "educated" urban supporters will never and refuse to accept.

Note that I deliberately made highlights for obvious reasons which everyone reading will understand.

That said, I won't accuse Maria Chin Abdullah of being ignorant if she cannot read and understand Bahasa Malaysia just like those, I am quite convinced, hundreds and thousands of opposition supporters who voted for Pakatan Rakyat parties other thnn PAS.

The original NYT report is here and the single line Malaysian connection,

The exchangers, the indictment said, “tended to be unlicensed money-transmitting businesses without significant government oversight or regulation, concentrated in Malaysia, Russia, Nigeria and Vietnam.”

First thought that came to mind - Ah Longs.

I am sure the government and/or Bank Negara will respond.

The Malaysian Insider may or may not have but readers please DO read the comments of the NYT report for an alternative view.

Yes, the rural folks who have children, relatives and friends working or domiciled in the urban areas of the country are - the "ignorant" rural folks.

PAS should, no, must seriously consider pulling out of the Pakatan Rakyat as these are the sentiments of the majority of urbanites who are MORE "educated".

PAS core supporters are also these "ignorant" rural, and I must add, Malay folks AND if they can stomach these type of insults, they deserve to be in the situation they are in - unwanted but needed by the Pakatan Rakyat, to make the numbers.

To justify the popular votes, which by the way, is the subject and headline of Malaysiakini's 'Your Say'.

I say, ironic isn't it?

These "educated" urbanites cannot fathom and ignore the fact that minus PAS and their "ignorant" rural folks' votes, Pakatan Rakyat would then be DAP and PKR, and be left with the popular votes of the........Chinese tsunami, period.

In closing, I also consider this sentiment that rural folks are "ignorant and uneducated" an insult and racist stereotyping by the opposition and their "educated" urban and tech savvy supporters to justify their loss in GE 13.

To the Malay opposition supporters, please open your eyes and don't close your ears and sorry to say you tak ada maruah.

Friday, May 24, 2013

Which brings me to a must read piece by Nile Bowie, "Is Malaysia Teetering on the Edge of an Islamist Knife?", courtesy of The Mole.

From Bowie's original essay, quote,

"It’s quite commonplace to find ethnic-Chinese Malaysians railing against their self-perceived status as “second-class citizens,” but these frustrations don’t live up to scrutiny, as the conditions Malaysia’s Chinese community are subjected to do not resemble that of a deprived community by any stretch of the imagination"

And the most quotable quote"How many, Malays do you see with Chinese drivers?”

[Translation: “Take my details, lodge a police report, because today, I would like to invite all those here today to gather and take to the streets to seize back our power! Can we do that? Can we do that? Can we do that? We do not have much time left, get ready, buy shoes, buy tracksuits, buy jeans, get ready to take to the streets because in a third world country like Malaysia, elections cannot topple a government.

“Only the people’s power can topple a government. Remember, ladies and gentlemen, this is the only opportunity we have.”]

I have highlighted in bold what I believe to be most incriminating.

Yes, it is true according to Adam's lawyer the Sedition Act is being in the process of being repealed but...

But Adam Adli must consider himself very lucky that he was NOT charged under a more serious offence.

Whoever compasses, imagines, invents or intends the deposition or deprivation of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong from the sovereignty of Malaysia or the deprivation or deposition of the Ruler, his heirs or successors, or of the Yang di-Pertua Negeri from the rule of a State, or the overawing by means of criminal force or the show of criminal force the Government of Malaysia or of any State, shall be punished with imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine.

Also highlighted in bold is the relevant transgression and the more severe punishment.

Definition of "overawing" - verb (used with object), o·ver·awed, o·ver·aw·ing.
to restrain or subdue by inspiring awe; intimidate : He often uses that imperious scowl to overawe his subordinates.

and

Legal definitions of "criminal force" and the one I found most appropriate - (h) A incites a dog to spring upon Z, without Z' s consent. Here, if A intends to cause injury, fear or annoyance to Z, he uses criminal force to Z.

I can only advise Adam not to be too exuberant in pursuit of his beliefs to the point of breaking the law.

He is young and as I have said Gen Y are our future, so, he should not get carried away by deceitful rhetoric of the opposition especially the PKR and it's de facto leader.

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

What is so offensive about the phrase - Chinese tsunami? Can anyone deny that the Chinese voted overwhelmingly for the opposition or against the Barisan Nasional?

Remember that chief analyst from Bank Islam who got into hot soup over his election "analysis" prior to GE 13?

This Chinaman is worse.

His name is John Pang.

In a New York Times article, which the Chinaman wrote, selected excerpts and my comments follow.

"In one of the most brazen examples of manufacturing ethnic identity for political gain, Mahathir Mohamad, the prime minister from 1981 to 2003, imported about 700,000 Muslim immigrants from the southern Philippines into the Malaysian state of Sabah."

This is but one of the reasons why the Chinese became a tsunami - believing lies.

For all his credentials, the like of the DAP types such as Tony Pua and Ong Kian Ming, this Chinaman spews a direct lie in the face of facts.

"I can find no evidence that there was a conspiracy between the Government and the Barisan Nasional (BN) at the highest level as suggested by Mr. Maringking. Not an iota of evidence to show the existence of an agreement between the Prime Minister or any other Minister with the Sabah BN regarding the registration of disqualified persons or non-citizens in the electoral roll. The semblance of an agreement in the ‘Operation Gembeling’ or the ‘Mahathir’s Project’where blue identity cards were sold to these people at RM300 a piece, evidently has no nexus to connect these to the fake identity cards sold. It is a mere gimmick to lend legitimacy to these operations" - High court judge, Muhammad Kamil Awang

The following shows the Chinaman's true colours.

"The Malaysian electoral system is heavily gerrymandered against the urban and Chinese vote."

"However, several scholars have pointed to its possible occurrence in Malaysia since 1974. Ong’s examination of the 2003 re-delineation in Kedah (a sensitive State in the next general election) uncovers enough cases to point to almost systematic gerrymandering of parliamentary constituencies in Kedah, besides cases in other States. This has made it very difficult for several current PAS MPs to retain their seats in Kedah in the next election."

Before you go, "see I told you so, gerrymandering", the preceeding sentence before the above quote is -

"Establishing gerrymandering, or the manipulation of constituency boundaries for partisan advantage, is inherently difficult."

Without any evidence to back his claim, the Chinaman goes on that oft repeated and tiring lie,

"Over the past week, chartered flights that may have been ordered by Mr. Najib’s office have flown thousands of foreign laborers working in Malaysia’s Sabah and Sarawak provinces on the island of Borneo into key voting areas in mainland Malaysia."

The Chinaman cannot even lie for nuts.

1. BN gives the "thousands of foreign labourers" a Mykad.

2. BN then registers the "thousands of foreign labourers" in key voting areas in mainland Malaysia.

3. The "thousands of foreign labourers" are sent to Sabah and Sarawak to work.

4. The "thousands of foreign labourers" in Sabah and Sarawak are then flown back to mainland Malaysia to vote.

I won't waste my time explaining the election process to slap Borang 14 on the Chinaman's face.

Why did I say this Chinaman is worse than that Bank Islam chief analyst?

And Chief Executive Officer of CIMB ASEAN Research Institute (CARI), "which was established in 2011 by CIMB Group as a regional public service in support of ASEAN’s programme of economic integration, the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) " to boot.

What the f**k!

Surely everyone knows what the CIMB Group nexus is. Need I say? As the saying goes, although it might not be as appropriate - with these kind of friends, who need enemies?

Never mind, I always say.

The Chinaman ended his resume of lies with,

"If, against all odds, the opposition wins, this may go down as a revolution in which the incumbents were laughed out of power"

Saturday, May 18, 2013

Church mass last Sunday, a week after the 13 GE polls which I must happily add the ruling BN was returned to govern, was NOT without mention of the previous week momentous event.

But it was a very, very, much watered down call to continue praying. For UBAH, though it was not said directly this time, I dare venture to say.

That contemptible fellow Brother Anwar Bin Ibrahim, not content with the opposition's best showing at any general election, is taking matters into his own selfish hands putting cart before horse, with his band of unmerry men taking to the streets to usurp a democratically elected government.

Coming back to the subject at hand, if I and others like myself had thought the end of GE 13 would also be the end of politics in support of the opposition from the pulpit, out comes that idiot Bishop, Bishop Paul Tan with his histrionics and pseudo justifications.

As far as I am concerned, he does not deserve the honorific "Reverend", for I do not revere him. And to coin a familiar phrase, neither is he my father.

FMT reported,

"Bishop Paul Tan said this in reference to the report of the Institute of Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS) and Centre for Public Policy Studies (CPPS).

“IDEAS and CPPS have done an interim report. In it, there is this conclusion: ‘GE13 was only partially free and not fair’. I find it difficult to believe that the report could conclude this…

“But when it concluded ‘only partially free’ for the three reasons given that are fraught with irregularities as reported in the said report, the people involved are not objective,” he said.

“From the multiple examples of irregularities arrived in the report, permit me to use a stronger phrase than that of IDEAS and CPPS: GE13 is anything but transparently ‘free and fair’,” he added."

However, "Tan, who heads the Malacca and Johor diocese, conceded that he could be wrong but stressed that he was morally obliged to speak out at this time because of the immorality practiced before and during GE13".

Well, that says it all.

When the Bishop concedes that he could be wrong why then is there a need for all the pontification?

"the conduct of the electoral process on nominations, campaigning, polling and results declaration were by the book and proper, with no really serious breaches of protocol that could be observed to skew the polls process"

The justification, quote,

"Tan said while he obeyed the Catholic Church’s teaching that clerics must not take sides in partisan politics, he noted that the church also taught that clerics must speak out against immoralities and against all that go against human rights"

All I can say is, Bishop Paul Tan go tell all the "Fathers" that have taken a partisan position in preaching support for the opposition from the pulpit, rather, to thank God there has been no cases in Malaysia of sexual and immoral assault of alter boys which is a worse abuse of human rights.

Of course, I am not saying or implying that Bishop Paul Tan is encouraging Catholics to take to the streets. Did I?

By the way, what Bishop Tan is telling Catholics, like me, who have voted for the BN - we are all immoral and condone human rights abuses.

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

"President Barack Obama telephoned Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak on Tuesday to congratulate the prime minister on his success in getting the mandate from the people to continue leading Malaysia.

In the surprise call, Obama expressed his understanding and acceptance of the process and results of the country's recently-concluded GE13.

In a statement issued here Tuesday, the Prime Minister's Office said that during the conversation, the US president was also briefed on the Government's efforts to ensure the clean and fair process of the elections.

It said that on his part, Obama had agreed to participate in the two-day Global Entrepreneurship Summit in Kuala Lumpur, beginning Oct 11.

"Malaysia and the United States will continue to strengthen bilateral relations through regional and international cooperation," said the statement.

In 2000, when the youngest of first time Malaysian voters were about 9 years old and too young to remember, many Malaysians like yours truly were glued to the TV watching the epic US elections results unfolding and many like me were rooting for the Republican presidential candidate, a certain George W Bush.

Malaysians then, were hoping the Democratic candidate, Al Gore, would get his comeuppance for his kurang ajar "reformasi" outburst at the APEC meeting hosted by Malaysia earlier in 1998.

KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia: Who's afraid of a little blowback? Not Al Gore. "That is the American message and I am proud to deliver it here and anywhere I go," he told reporters after New Zealand, Singapore and China joined Malaysia in needling the veep for bringing politics to a summit that's supposed to be all business. "APEC is an economic forum," said New Zealand's Prime Minister Jenny Shipley, whose country will host next year's summit. "Clearly there are some pressing bilateral issues that countries want to raise here in Malaysia, but it should not be at the expense of APEC."

TIME Washington correspondent Jef McAllister says Gore's critics shouldn't forget that his salute to "reformasi" Monday was plenty grounded in economic policy. It was Anwar's chumminess with the IMF that got him in trouble, he says, and it's Mahathir's nose-thumbing capital controls, not his long-time thuggery, that have the U.S. so riled. And notice that Mahathir's Asian counterparts were careful to stick up for APEC -- not Mahathir. "He's isolated himself so much from the rest of the region," says McAllister, "that the U.S. really doesn't have much to worry about."

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Pro-Pakatan Rakyat groups have vowed to overthrow the Barisan Nasional government this year through a massive street rally.

Speakers at a forum held yesterday unanimously agreed that waiting for five years until the next general election was too long, and vowed to overthrow BN this year through “force”.

The street rally is rumoured to be as early as May 17 or 18 to overthrow BN and capture Putrajaya.

“We will take to the streets and take over Putrajaya. If we really want to overthrow them, there is no other way. Democracy does not work,” Haris Ibrahim from ABU (Anything But Umno) told the 1,500-strong crowd here.

“The people cannot wait anymore. We don’t want to wait another five years. We will take the streets,” he added.

PKR vice-president and Batu MP Tian Chua mirrored Haris’ cry to overthrow BN through force, and said it was the people’s choice.

“The decision to wait another five years or fight is not the right of Pakatan leaders, the results during the polls were not of Pakatan… but the rakyat’s,” he said.

Saturday, May 11, 2013

When PM Datuk Seri Najib referred to the "Chinese tsunami", why was it inflammatory when what was said is a matter of fact?

And what of the popular vote of "269,130 votes based on calculations by The Malaysian Insider" that Anwar Ibrahim is trying to spring in Malaysia? There is no respect for the rules of laws of the land from this despicable man.

Yes, Anwar Ibrahim wants it both ways, pun intended. Making a claim for the federal govt on account of the popular vote. But a popular vote of an election which he rails is "fraudulent".

Here are the facts of the Chineses tsunami, read in conjunction with the popular votes, which Anwar Ibrahim as a Malay, is so proud of.

The following are the results of the Chinese chauvinist party, DAP, in constituencies of FT and Penang. The margins of the majority votes they received total 281,000 votes.

Add majorities won in Perak P64 - Ipoh Timor, P65 - Ipoh Barat and P66 - Batu Gajah, that's another 100,000 to give a grand total of the Chinese tsunami votes of 381,000 and with that the "popular" votes for the Pakatan Rakyat.

Fact, only the Chinese chauvinist DAP carried majorities in excess of 30,000 votes in the heavily Chinese majority constituencies. That cannot be said of PKR and PAS in any constituency.

And don't come with that, "How can DAP be a Chinese chauvinist party when they had Malays and Indians contesting on the DAP ticket?"

With the Chinese tsunami, even if a Bangladeshi were to stand on the DAP ticket, the Bangladeshi would win.

By the way, it could be that Anwar Ibrahim is making a big fuss about the popular vote because he himself had his majority in Permatang Pauh reduced from 15,671 in 2008 to 11,721 this time around.

Friday, May 10, 2013

"You, the younger generation, are our nation's future. Share your thoughts with intelligent, healthy, and lively comments. A place to have your say to the government in its transformation. Even those who disagree are welcome. I will appreciate for BN supporters all across Malaysia to provide the contact info of our elected representative in the federal and state legislature as a service to the people who elected them"

Yes siree, Bob, the man with many hats, titled positions id est in DAP, Ong Kian Ming is certainly in the limelight.

I beg the question of the newly minted Serdang MP:

Do you agree that Anwar Ibrahim, as your boss Lim Guan Eng insists, is the best choice as Pakatan Rakyat prime minister of Malaysia?

Quote,

"The rest, as they say, is history as Anwar embarked on an ambitious agenda to increase the degree of Islamisation in Malaysia by establishing Islamic institutions, think tanks, and institutions of higher learning as well as introducing Islamic studies into public universities." - Ong Kian Ming

MCA must stand united. There is no point asking Datuk Seri Chua Soi Lek to resign immediately. Datuk Seri Chua has already said he will not defend his president post. Stand united. There must not be factions in the MCA.

Doing so will only play into the hands of the DAP who wants to see a weakened MCA.

The same goes for UMNO.

It's only Datuk Seri Najib's first general election.

In my honest opinion, our PM has done very well for UMNO, no matter what anyone says. Retaking Kedah and more MPs in Parliament is testimony.

"Based on a-decade-old data, Ong said that there are 3.1 million voters who vote in constituencies that do not tally with the address stated on their MyKads."

1. Mr Ong Kian Ming of DAP and newly elected MP should have been the polls director for his own party's shady party polls, reported to the ROS by it's own members.

2. His party cannot even count from 1 to less than 2000 but Ong Kian Ming managed to count from 1 to 3,300,000!

3. With 3,300,000 voters, BN should have won by a landslide!

See the pattern like his party boss Lim Guan Eng who kept quiet about the shady DAP party polls results?

Ong, who is the director of the Malaysia Electoral Roll Analysis Project (Merap), said that he came into possession of the data almost 10 years ago as well.

But this is worse. Ong Kian Ming kept quiet for ten years!

Back to the Future

Also,

"Another problem is the existence of 65,455 foreign nationals registered as voters in the electoral roll, said Ong, adding that 90 percent held MyKad indicating they are Malaysia-born.
The data shows many are from Brunei, Cocos, the Philippines, Indonesia and Pakistan"

How accurate! But Ong Kian Ming forgot to mention Bangladeshis.

BN must get their act together. BN does not even know how to cheat. Selangor also cannot win.

The results of an election can only be challenged by an election petition which must be submitted within 21 days from the date of the election results being gazetted.

An election petition is heard in a High Court which is convened as an election court. The hearing of the petition is to be completed within 6 months from the date on which the petition is presented. A petitioner who is dissatisfied with the decision of the election court may appeal directly to the Federal Court.

Grounds for an election petition are as follows: bribery, intimidation or other misconduct which may affect the outcome of the election, non-compliance with election laws and regulations, acts of corruption or illegal acts committed by a candidate or his agent or ineligibility of a candidate to participate in the election

.
Penang has already sworn in their beloved CM, no problems there. Kelantan has already retired their Tok Guru, no problems there as well. Selangor is still in limbo for whatever reason. Maybe PAS does not trust their partners, who cheat in their own party elections id est.

Firstly, uber Chinese chauvinist and DAP supremo Lim Kit Siang, should write his own views more often and not depend on lackeys - the opposition leaning online news portals. One of the many ways the DAP has psyched the Chinese into hating the Barisan Nasional and the government.

The 2000 election was not the first time a candidate won the popular vote but lost the election. It has happened four times in our nation's history:

In 1824 Andrew Jackson won the popular vote but got less then 50% of the electoral votes. John Quincy Adams became the next president when he was picked by the House of Representatives. In 1876 Samuel Tilden won the popular vote but lost the election when Rutherford B. Hayes got 185 electoral votes to Tilden's 184. In 1888 Grover Cleveland won the popular vote but lost the election when Benjamin Harrison got 233 electoral votes to Cleveland's 168. In 2000 Al Gore won the popular vote but lost the election to George Bush. In the most highly contested election in modern history, the U.S. Supreme Court stopped the Florida recount of ballots, giving Bush the state's 25 electoral votes for a total of 271 to Gore's 255.

Cannot but help commenting in all this nonsense about indelible being delible, washed with soap and what not.

The most ludicrous being erased with grass, look I am not going to waste my time, just google it.

My siblings and their spouses totalling 6, two at different constituencies and the other four at Kepong, one at a different polling station.

Result - none of us could get the ink washed off.

The only conclusion to arrive in all of this are that they are coming from the opposition leaning, no need to say.

Only thing I will say if it is possible, these people who claimed with proof that the ink could be washed away, for the EC to check whether these guys had voted.

In Facebook, these allegations in comments, ALL without exception have not replied to my comment, go try and vote again.

Anyway, this humiliating 3rd world "remedy" to counter "phantoms", also seen to be but a few albeit one here and another there, was forced upon us by that glorified, BERSIH.

By the way one of the most pictured "hantu", "phantom" or whatever, looks like a untidy and confused person, possibly immigrant and a patsy, getting "caught" and released. Needs to be said, my comment in the video version on Facebook of the same person has also gone..unanswered.

All I have to say and propose to BERSIH and their band of idiots, instead of indelible ink, tattoo. The Plan, The Plan.

From commentor M. Rmd. Kwo K. with a very big thank you and deepest appreciation,

The elections are just around the corner, about 3 days away. Here are many strong reasons why we should not choose Pakatan Rakyat.

1) Pakatan Rakyat is made up of three parties, namely, Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR), Parti Islam SeMalaysia (Pas) and Democratic Action Party (DAP). Democratic Action Party (DAP) is a member of Socialist International, a worldwide organisation of political parties from various countries. Many parties of Socialist International come from communist, atheist and Marxist backgrounds. 'Atheists' refer to people who do not believe in God, and people who believe that God does not exist.

2) DAP's membership in Socialist International may explain the secular direction of the party. Karpal Singh, the DAP chairman, has consistently regarded Malaysia as a secular country. The entire direction of DAP is to ensure that Malaysia is governed in a secular way. 'Secular' means governing the country without reference to religion. DAP is a secular party, without religion and therefore without God.

3) DAP is descended from PAP (the People's Action Party of Singapore). Both the PAP and DAP use the 'Malaysian Malaysia' slogan. The logos of both parties are also almost identical. The PAP has ruled Singapore continuously since before 1965. Having been a member of the Socialist International, the PAP is also secular, as revealed by the Singapore national Declaration on Religious Harmony, which says to recognise Singapore as a secular state.

4) The Singapore/PAP government teaches that Stamford Raffles is the founder of Singapore. Singaporeans are taught by their PAP government that Raffles is a positive figure. 'Raffles' has therefore become a national trademark for Singapore, as such Raffles City (built in Singapore and also in mainland China), Raffles Class (on Singapore Airlines), Raffles Quay, Raffles Place (the city centre), Raffles Hotel and the elite and prestigious secondary school Raffles Institution. However, the truth about Raffles is that he is a racist who practised racial segregation; when Raffles governed Singapore, he split the Malays, Chinese and Indians by housing them in separate areas. He kept the races apart. This is known as the divide-and-conquer technique. Raffles was a white imperialist, a British colonialist, and there is no excuse that can be made for him. Therefore, the fact that the PAP government puts Raffles on a pedestal and bathes him in a favourable light, shows us the beliefs of PAP. The PAP government does not just name things using 'Raffles', it gives prominent place to the Raffles statue, which is by the Singapore River and has been shifted before by the government to give it even more prominence. The PAP government presents the Raffles statue as a national icon, and schoolchildren are given a positive history of Raffles and the British takeover of Singapore.

5) Remember the recent comments made by PAP and PAP-related figures? That NTUC high-ranked figure Amy Chong (or Cheong) who criticised Malay weddings, Malay lifestyle and Malay society, and that senior PAP figure who called Malay a foreign language. These are further indications that a world governed by PAP is a terrible, racist and chauvinistic world. Are we to believe that DAP will behave differently from PAP?

6) According to many indexes, Malaysia, under Barisan Nasional (BN), is ranked higher than PAP-led Singapore in terms of press freedom. Singapore is an oppressed society in terms of freedom of speech and freedom of press and media. By comparison, Malaysia has a much wider variety of press and publications, and gives greater political liberty to opposition parties. This explains why you can observe that Malaysia's opposition parties are very active and vibrant, while in Singapore, the opposition is timid and dares not oppose PAP. This is because the PAP has been very brutal with the opposition, such as suing opposition figures until they become bankrupt. In Malaysia, DAP is also very fond of suing people. Do you believe that DAP will give you political freedom, when it comes to power?

7) The PAP government deals brutally with dissent and alternative opinions. Joshua B Jeyaratnam and Chee Soon Juan are just two of the many victims. The press landscape is bleak. No one dares publish a different view. This explains why you can hardly see any opposition newspapers or newsletters in Singapore. Do you think DAP will behave differently from PAP? Already, DAP is suing people who give alternative viewpoints. DAP also calls for boycotts, telling people to boycott this paper or that paper. Worse, the DAP bars press entities who may report ugly truths about the party, prohibiting the journalists from attending DAP press conferences.

8) What if DAP comes to power? Would it start a crackdown on press it does not like? Judging from PAP behaviour, we cannot say DAP is a good party for our future. DAP could destroy freedom and civic liberties. DAP, PAP and their Socialist International involvement really explain the pattern: Communist parties have always restricted freedom of speech and freedom of press. Every Marxist government behaves in the same way: it squashes dissent, and jails, tortures and kills critics and thinkers.

9) The way PAP treats opponents, and the same way that DAP has begun to behave, reminds us that there will be no opposition under Pakatan Rakyat. If you let Pakatan Rakyat come to power, you destroy democracy in Malaysia. Pakatan Rakyat will not allow opposition to exist. BN will be wiped out. Even if BN voices manage to survive, they are suppressed, subdued or muted, under the threat of retribution from DAP.

10) If Pakatan Rakyat comes to power, not only will BN be gagged and suppressed, but all other alternative parties as well. The evidence can be found in Singapore, where the PAP gags SDA (PKMS, the Umno in Singapore, is a member of SDA) and various non-SDA parties with no BN history or relation, such as the Singapore Democratic Party, Workers' Party, National Solidarity Party and others. If Pakatan Rakyat were to rule, it would spell the end of political liberty for the Malaysian people.

11) DAP and PAP claim that Umno is racist, when in actual fact, it is DAP and PAP which are the racists. Umno has been in alliance with the MCA from the very beginning; MCA and Umno refused to contest against each other from the very beginning, and have never contested against each other. Chinese-dominated PAP contested against Umno when Singapore was part of Malaysia. DAP, also racially imbalanced, with almost-total Chinese membership, stood with Pas on some occasions and against on other occasions. Both PAP and DAP are Chinese-majority parties with no stable Malay allies, and appear to have no intention of properly cooperating with Malay parties. So, the racist bigot is not Umno, but DAP

12) If allowed to come to power, DAP will destroy interracial cooperation and demote the Malaysian language. Evidence for this can be found in Singapore, where English and Mandarin, which are non-native languages, are ranked first and second, with Malay coming third and Tamil last. This is the case with signboards, train announcements and official government documents. Voting DAP into power is a risk to the future of indigenous languages. We must protect Malaysia as we know it: under BN, Malay is first, all community languages second, and English last. It is foolish to put English first and forsake our Asian identity; we respect the English language and are willing to learn positive things from the West, but this does not mean we should worship Westerners or bow down to their language. Malaysia is a unique, sovereign country, and has its cultural identity in the form of Bahasa Melayu/Malaysia. If Malay is demoted to second or third class, Malaysia loses its unique place in the world.

13) Pakatan Rakyat is a threat to national identity. DAP parodies a Korean song for the purpose of criticising BN, and not only that, DAP does so in a vulgar and distasteful way. The indecent parody, proudly produced by DAP MPs and used at DAP events, is likely just the tip of a large iceberg against Asian values. The war against Asian culture and national identity has already begun in Singapore, where the PAP builds a casino (Marina Bay Sands) and parades it as a national icon. There is no sovereign country on the face of this earth that presents casinos as national icons or national landmarks! The casinos of Macau are not the face of China, the casinos of Las Vegas are not the face of the United States, the casino at Genting Highlands is not the face of Malaysia. Only in Singapore will we find the casino being grouped into the national identity! This is how the PAP behaves; should we expect the DAP to behave differently? The DAP has shown itself to be anti-Malaysian. DAP, and PAP, have proven themselves to be of no moral and spiritual substance. DAP misappropriates pop culture, portrays Malaysians as laughing stock, and goes against peace and virtue. It is not a suitable party for Malaysia. In fact, it is not a suitable party for Asia. Considering its mockery of shared culture and shared standards, we must say DAP is not a suitable party for the world. DAP should not be allowed to govern!

14) That DAP goes against peace and virtue, is evident in its support for Bersih. DAP expresses grievances through street demonstrations, reducing Malaysia's standing in the world and getting the world to laugh at and misunderstand Malaysia. Pakatan Rakyat's support for Bersih is evidence that Pakatan Rakyat hates Malaysia. DAP, Pas and PKR want the world to see Malaysia as a Egypt, Syria or Tunisia. Riots, violence and vandalism are not shared values among true Malaysians. Pakatan Rakyat is happy when Malaysia's streets are litter-strewn, when the people are bluffed into screaming and yelling in the streets, when the city is plunged into a cloud of fury and fanaticism. PKR, Pas and DAP do not love Malaysia. They want to destroy our country.

15) Pakatan Rakyat is a threat to true Islam. Parti Islam SeMalaysia (Pas) deliberately misinterprets Islam, portraying it to be a harsh, uncompassionate religion. This is so that non-Muslims will misunderstand Islam and regard the religion with fear and suspicion. This is why Pas is willing to work with DAP: both parties are against Islam. Pas and DAP play push-and-pull games with each other, to confuse the people of Malaysia. Pakatan Rakyat is deceitful, playing such games, and coordinating various topics to bluff, scare and worry the people into voting for Pakatan Rakyat.

16) Pakatan Rakyat is anti-religion, anti-Islam, anti-Malay, anti-interracial and anti-God. It is against every virtue. Pas and DAP pretend to tiptoe around each other, when they are actually working together hand-in-glove. Pas and DAP put on an act: they fight each other so as to create divisions between Muslim and non-Muslim, Malay and non-Malay. The hidden goal is to keep the races separate, exactly as Raffles did, and get foreigners (i.e. white people) to rule over us.

17) Anwar Ibrahim (PKR) is working to hand Malaysia over to foreign control. White people, Jews, the IMF, the World Bank, various white American corporations and Jewish corporations are eager to control Malaysia, and Anwar is working to make that happen. A vote for a Pakatan Rakyat party means a vote towards losing national sovereignty. DAP, Pas and PKR are striving to make the various races uneasy and unfamiliar with one another, and work to keep the races apart, so that Jews, white people, and a small class of elite Chinese can control Malaysia against the will of the Malaysian people. The evidence of this can be seen in Singapore. The evidence is clear and indisputable. Singapore is controlled by white people, Jews, and the small elite class of Chinese PAP leaders. The PAP is the avenue through which Westerners control Singapore. It is likely Pakatan Rakyat will be the avenue through which Westerners control Malaysia.

18) Pakatan Rakyat is rooted in Marxism, through DAP and also through PKR. In 2008, two Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) candidates contested under the PKR ticket, and PSM was bold to declare at the same time that PSM follows the Communist Manifesto, the famous document authored by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Therefore, it is clear that both DAP and PKR are Marxist parties. (DAP's Marxist connection is found in the Socialist International, as earlier explained.) Marxism is an ideology that advocates the abolition of religion and the removal of God; Marxism explains that there is no spiritual aspect in this world, and therefore, Marxists (or Communists, as they are usually known) are atheists, and some Marxists are violent atheists, jailing, torturing and murdering hundreds of thousands of religious believers, scholars and teachers. History provides the facts plain and clear. Also, Marx is a Jew. This brings Pakatan Rakyat into full view: in addition to being pro-Israel and anti-Islam, the parties of Pakatan Rakyat are against virtue, liberty and justice. We must look at all 18 points carefully, before making our selection this Sunday, May 5, 2013.

The facts are clear. The 18 points reveal Pakatan Rakyat for what it really is: a secular, anti-religion coalition of power-hungry leaders with evil intentions. They tell bold lies. They tell the Malaysian people that Malaysia ought to be like Singapore. They put Singapore up high, as a shining example that Malaysians should follow. But the truth about Singapore is very different from Pakatan Rakyat's lies. In addition to proudly and relentlessly advertising the annual December 31st beach party countdown on national TV, and incorporating the casino into national day songs and the Singapore city skyline, the PAP government is expert at gerrymandering. PAP's deceitfulness and immorality is unmatched.

In Malaysia, 2008, BN received less than two-thirds of the total number of valid votes, and less than two-thirds of the total number of Parliamentary seats.

In Singapore, 2011, PAP received less than two-thirds of the total number of valid votes, but was still given more than 80 of the 87 Parliamentary seats.

PAP was still able to retain more than 90% of Parliament, even though it was given only 60% of the total number of valid votes, chiefly because the PAP government practises gerrymandering. Gerrymandering is the redrawing of district boundaries so that PAP wins a lot of seats on a few votes.

Elections and democracy are fair in Malaysia, especially when compared with Singapore! Districts are drawn fairly in Malaysia, and the proof can be seen in 2008, when BN was admitted to less than two-thirds of Parliamentary seats, which matches the fact it received less than two-thirds of the valid votes. In Singapore, the PAP received less than two-thirds of the valid votes, and was then admitted to not just more than two-thirds, but more than 90% of the Parliamentary seats!

Therefore, when DAP, Pas and PKR say that Malaysia ought to be like Singapore, I am frightened. Democracy and elections are highly corrupted in Singapore! By comparison, Malaysia is a superb electoral democracy! Pakatan Rakyat should take Bersih to Singapore. The PAP is the party which should be told what fair elections are.

Saturday, May 4, 2013

Its a sea of blue colours of Barisan Nasional everywhere. It is a sign of a rejuvenated ruling party.

But all the hard work, bountiful banners and posters do not translate into victory.

Barisan Nasional will win because they have that strong tradition of component parties closing ranks.

Members of the ruling coalition not picked to be candidates must realise the BN's warning to the rakyat is no rhetoric.

A Pakatan Rakyat ruled Malaysia will be the end in all that we cherish.

Support every BN candidate standing in the elections with all your heart.

Of course there are, those unscrupulous politicians not picked, those with a hand in the pie on boths sides, who would do their level best to sabotage their own comrades, on the sly.

Win or lose, these few traitors win.

Barisan Nasional supporters and workers must be wary of these so-called leaders. Reject and expose these saboteurs.

I am sure no Barisan Nasional supporter believe this election is going to be easy.

That would be folly and everyone must come out to vote and not take anything for granted.

The 2008 tsunami happened because there were many many angry BN supporters including yours truly. Many voted the other way and many spoiled their votes, creating a domino effect, taking for granted that Barisan Nasional would win anyway.

We, the BN supporters are also responsible for putting Pakatan Rakyat into orbit, like giant comets orbiting the planet.

2008 was like Haley's Comet passing by this earth.

The comet Pakatan Rakyat is in orbit, orbiting the country.

When comet Pakatan Rakyat lands all Malaysians will be doomed and the country will be destroyed.

BN and its supporters are confident but we cannot afford to be complacent.

The more I read BN will lose the happier I am because that will encourage us to come in the fullest force.

We must think AS IF Barisan Nasional will lose and we WILL win.

I tell you. Speaking to family members, friends and strangers, they have been duped into believing the opposition's deceitful propaganda and lies.

I engage and have discourse with them.

Say what you like, the opposition have been very effective disseminating their deceitful propaganda and lies.

The hardcore and rabid opposition supporters, most of the time, do not like to be engaged. They will never accept your point or any point of view anyway.

So, ask them simple question - why does the Pakatan Rakyat NOT have a common symbol.

With our unwavering support Barisan Nasional will prevail.

Barisan Nasional has stood the many difficult tests of time.

Barisan Nasional supporters are proud Malaysians for all that WE Malaysians cherish - harmony, peace, and prosperity.

There is already enough protest about bringing religion into politics but what about bringing politics into a house of worship? Can we then say that what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander?

The DAP and party leaders should leave matters in the hands of the voters, not make a religious affair by going to a house of worship. The country is polarised enough that such a show only drives the wedge further in.

For a political leader like Lim Guan Eng, this would open himself to a charge of opportunism when his spouse does it, even privately and not connected to the party.

At the end of the day, if Pakatan Rakyat (PR) and Lim believe they have done a good job in Penang, they should have trust in the voter and not speculate that bookies will have an influence in the results.

Keep the faith, but leave it out of politics. And leave politics out of religion.

MyKad

Love my country with its pimples, warts and all - a paradise on earth. Born in Kuala Lumpur, Selangor. Blog, Title and Description was created a flip-flop moment in time and what others following will aspire the country to be, that which was achieved by the Special One.

DISCLAIMER

All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. The owner of this blog does not share the view of any comments unless otherwise stated. The owner is not responsible and makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any comments published or information found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. Reader discretion is always advised.