Welcome! We regret to inform you that the Injury Board National News Desk has been discontinued. Feel free to browse around and enjoy our previously published articles, or visit The Injury Blog Network for the latest in personal injury news.

The news group compiled jury awards in 2008 and found no award above that amount. In 2007, there was one high verdict for $1.5 billion.

Prior to that, there was at least one billion dollar verdict a year for the past 14 years.

And there were six cases producing awards more than $5 billion each.

Judges are now allowed to throw out large awards if they deem they exceed actual damages. Phoenix attorney Grant Woods tells Bloomberg that he is careful when addressing the jury on that point. “Not too little, not too much,” he tells them.

The result of lowering of high punitive damages is that corporate clients are less inclined to settle out of court.

That’s the opinion of Marquette Wolf of Mesquite, Texas who won an $84 million jury verdict against U-Haul in 2008. That amount included $63 million in punitive damages but was later reduced to just over $45 million and is currently on appeal.

“When the threat of punitives was there, the courthouse was a level playing field,” he tells Bloomberg. “Now the threat of consequence isn’t there for billion dollar corporations.”

Top 10 Awards

Even the total of the top 10 awards of 2008 was down about 30 percent from the year before and down 63 percent from 2006.

The largest verdict of 2008 involved a contract dispute with Boeing Co and a subsidiary, and amounted to $606 million, won by Manatt, Phelps & Phillips.

A jury found that Boeing violated the terms of a deal with ICO Global Communications under which Boeing agreed in the mid-1990s to build a dozen communications satellites. ICO terminated the deal in 2004, when Boeing asked for $400 million in additional funding to complete the project, reports AmLaw.

The last billion dollar punitive verdict was in 2004.

State limits on damages, federal limits on claims, judge discretion, and tort reform backed by businesses likely to be sued, all members of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have added to the decline. Jurors are increasingly skeptical and less sympathetic to plaintiffs in some cases, while federal preemption is already curtailing a remedy through the courts.

Reversed

Even when one wins big, the danger is that win will be reversed.

A 2007 billion-dollar verdict against Microsoft in a patent case was reversed and settled.

An $11.9 billion case against Exxon Mobile Corp for underpayment of natural gas royalties was erased in post-trial appeals. Alabama, which brought the lawsuit, wound up with $120 million, according to Exxon attorney Samuel Franklin talking to Bloomberg.

Punitive damages are designed to damage the wrong-doer but are not to exceed as much as ten times the actual damage, unless the damage is particularly egregious, the high court ruled in 2003.

The Exxon Valdez oil spill didn’t qualify as particularly egregious.

The U.S. Supreme Court intervened in the Exxon Valdez oil spill case which generated a $2.5 billion punitive judgment. The justices in June replaced that award with $507 million.

IB memberJon Lewis, an attorney from Birmingham writes that instead of the $2.5 in punitive, Exxon got off easy. “The kicker? In the last quarter, $500 million equaled about four days of net profit. That means, it will take four days for them to pay off this verdict.”

And in Florida, the Engle tobacco case, still the biggest jury verdict ever at $145 billion, was thrown out and disbanded forcing thousands of plaintiffs to go it alone in individual cases which are still unresolved.

The concept of negligence recognizes that manufacturers often have more ability than consumers to avoid accidents; thus, it is more likely to view failure to take inexpensive action as negligence or to attach liability. Still, the majority of tort disputes never reach a trial verdict.

2 Comments

Posted by exCordova womanFriday, January 09, 2009 7:18 PM EST

I'm a plaintiff. The spill made me lose my livelyhood, my home, my ability to survive in my home state of Alaska. I lost my business in Cordova which I made on average $90,000 a year. The courts decided our actual damages which were to pay us for one years damages. Not only did I not get one years damages ($7400), but the harm to we plaintiffs was multi-year and some of our fisheries have never come back. We fought for 19 years to try to be made somewhat whole and we were robbed by the corrupt big business SCOTUS. They had no precedent to do what they did and pulled the number out of their Exxon-lubricated a$$e$. My reward for 19 years of going through hell... less than $5000. You people are in the most disgraceful and corrupt profession there is.

Posted by Jane AkreSunday, January 11, 2009 11:18 AM EST

Cordova-

There are attorneys who work for corporations and there are trial attorneys who work for people who have been injured such as yourself. They are two distinct areas of the profession. When you need help - you may find that you cannot go it alone and need the help of an injury attorney. A good one will be your ally, not your enemy. I'm wondering if you had an attorney, and/or if you had one truly representing your interests.

Comments for this article are closed.

About the National News Desk

Our mission is to seek the complete truth and provide a full and fair account of the events and issues that surround personal safety, accident prevention, and injury recovery. We are committed to serving the public with honesty and integrity in these efforts.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when
comments are made on this post.

Who We AreThe Legal Examiner offers both bloggers and readers the opportunity to share their thoughts and opinions on all things law. From news on current legislative efforts to practical guidance on everyday legal issues, The Legal Examiner will have it covered. Learn More