Casting aside or investigating and
prosecuting the tricks and travesties of this political season Bernie
Sanders would be the obvious winner in the Democratic Primary.
Included in this lineup is the mainstream media, media black-outs,
Associated Press, the DNC, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, the debate
schedule, superdelegates, vote rigging, voter suppression and
election fraud, lies about Bernie's successes in Congress, the
private email server in the basement of Hillary's home, the Clinton
Foundation and most recently 20,000 leaked emails from the DNC
undermining Bernie's campaign.

Hillary's rise to power, if not halted
by any of the above, will be the biggest heist in United States
politics. True Progressives are infuriated at the unmitigated gall
of the Democratic political machine to be lying so blatantly to
millions of citizens who worked tirelessly for their candidate in
this election. The 4-day Democratic National Convention, costing in
excess of $84 million, is assisted throughout by mainstream media,
painting a picture perfect storybook image of Hillary Clinton.

- Advertisement -

Bernie Sanders had to have guts and
integrity to jump into this election cycle. We learned throughout
the primaries, how difficult it is
to challenge the status quo of the political hierarchy where
corporations and wealthy donors influence elected and appointed
officials in power all of whom are reaping the benefits. Bernie's campaign has exposed the magnitude and insidiousness of
the Clinton dynasty and all that reinforces it within our current
democracy. There is no playbook to follow. This election cycle is
in uncharted territory and the voters need an infusion of support
from a cadre of people such as the individuals listed at the end of
this article, who are not beholden to the political system currently
in place.

The Democratic Platform established
between Bernie's and Hillary's campaigns, without vigilant
watchfulness is destined to be "all talk and no action" if
Hillary steps into the White House. Even if the Platform meant
something, preliminary discussions may have sounded like they are
moving in Bernie's favor but it could have been subterfuge to detract
attention from the infuriating conclusion of FBI Director James
Comey, in absolving Hillary of any negligence.

Before Hillary selected Tim Kaine, the
U.S. Senator from Virginia, as her Vice Presidential running mate,
among others, Senator Elizabeth Warren paraded around town as a
potential VP, but Warren on the ticket did not hold much promise.
Hillary is far from the Progressive candidate that Bernie is and
Warren's failure to endorse him speaks volumes about her integrity.
Anything Warren could accomplish in Hillary's White House would be
counterproductive to everything we thought she believed in and
everything Sanders' campaign supporters have been fighting for and
funding. Had she stayed out of the fray until the Convention that
might have been her salvation.

- Advertisement -

There are three questions about the
primaries, the answers to which could have changed the course of
history right up to the Democratic Convention and beyond. The first
two involve Bernie's attorney, Brad C. Deutsch, what he did or didn't
do and what he could have done. The first question is about election
fraud and the second has to do with the impropriety of the media.
The third question concerns the superdelegates whose moral compass
may be dormant but might still be activated with the help of Bernie's
most active supporters.

While incorrectly counting
superdelegates' endorsements all along, mainstream media acted
inexcusably on June 6th, when the night before 7 critical
primaries including California and New Jersey, Hillary was crowned
the presumptive nominee. Led by the Associated Press, the media
shared their disingenuous calculations with the viewing audience
saying the requisite number of previously "uncommitted"
superdelegates now had "anonymously" informed them that they
would be endorsing Hillary.

Superdelegates' votes, according to
Party rules, are meaningless until the Convention and changeable any
time up to and during the Convention. The Hillary Victory Fund
concocted a convoluted and deceptive fundraising system enabling
wealthy donors to contribute exorbitant sums to help candidates up
and down the ballot, many of them superdelegates, when in fact the
majority of the money went back to Hillary's campaign. This
fundraising scheme in actuality created a conflict of interest for
the superdelegates. The superdelegates need to be convinced their own
integrity is on the line and it is to their benefit and the nation as
a whole for them to endorse Bernie.

Brad C. Deutsch, an owner of
Garvey Schubert Barer Law, is Bernie's attorney. Deutsch represents
"a range of House and Senate candidates, as well as corporations
and their political committees." How strong is his commitment to
Bernie's campaign? Is there a conflict of interest similar to the
situation with Tad Devine, a senior advisor to Bernie 2016?

Back in March, several comments made by
Tad Devine, president of
Devine, Mulvey and Longabaugh, a Democratic media consulting firm
were less than stellar. Devine lost my vote of confidence early on
when he shared on national television and in print media, comments
about Bernie's potential for winning the nomination. When
questioned about whether Sanders would consider being Hillary's
running mate on her ticket and the magnitude of Sanders' campaign
efforts and results in early states, his remarks put Sanders campaign
in a compromised position that had to be dialed back.