Comment Of The Week

She had that director dick inside her and she loved every bit of it. While he was hammering her wet little pussy, he told her what a little slut she was and if her boyfriend was aware that she was such a dirty little slut. When she replied between two heavy breaths a whispered “no”, he spanked her ass and with a deep voice, he told her that she’s a nasty little slut and that she should be ashamed of cheating on her boyfriend. She didn’t reply and kept moaning until he ordered her “say that you’re my little bitch. SAY IT”. She said “I’m your little bitch”. “Say that you love cheating on your boyfriend with daddy’s big dick”. “I love cheating… I love cheating on my boyfriend with daddy’s big dick. oooohhhh yes. FUCK ME . FUCK MEEEEE”…

Next thing you know. “I’m sorry about the indiscretion. It just happened.”

The ease and facility with which women resort to hamsterizations is scary. If Genghis Khan were a woman, she might have done a good job of convincing other women and beta manboobs that her genocidal rampage “just happened”. A drum circle for peace would then have ensued, followed by group sympathy hugs.

***

Second place comment winner (and a set of steak knives) goes to YaReally for his insightful comments about Kristen Stewart’s cheating:

On a more constructive note, one of the comments left on that yahoo site says “Stewart commented not too long ago that her life was too easy and too boring. Guess the only way she was able to inject some interest in her life was to foul up someone’s marriage.”

I’ve found that to be a driving force behind a LOT of fucked up behavior from some women. Specifically really attractive ones who find life just too easy. Everyone lets them get away with everything because, like a celebrity, they can do no wrong. It creates a feeling of restless boredom and like you aren’t a part of the “normal” world because people aren’t treating you the way they would treat someone who wasn’t as attractive/rich/important/famous/etc. as you.

So they act up and do things that’ll specifically cause drama and piss people off just to feel “normal”. It’s a really interesting situation to me from a psychology perspective because most “normal” people will never experience that feeling or be able to understand or relate to it, and those people who have life “too easy” can’t bitch about it to normal people or they sound ungrateful so they just suffer in silence.

I was banging a girl who would treat her best friends like absolute shit, she was DYING for them to get mad at her or yell at her or leave an angry facebook comment or just SOMETHING to make her feel normal, but they’d never do it because she was too hot and too high value in her social circles and the general nightlife for anyone to dare cross her.

A lot of people (including this girl) end up going down the coke-head path because they’re chasing “feeling something”. That’s why a lot of really high-end social groups in the nightlife scene are full of coke-heads. Their day to day world is so full of phoney fake bullshit from everyone around them that they need to escape it for a few hours.

The guys she banged were guys like me who treated her like a normal person and bitched her out when she acted up.

Anyway, I don’t know if Stewart made out with a married guy around town repeatedly in broad daylight without wearing disguises or anything knowing paparazzi would be around on PURPOSE, but there were probably a lot of subconscious factors involved in why her little adventure was so recklessly executed.

Hot (or self-perceived hot) girls need more manufactured drama in their lives because everyone, and particularly beta males, walk on eggshells around them, depriving them of this most basic female macronutrient. If you plan to have a relationship with a hot, high status girl with a history of cheating (Stewart cheated on her previous boyfriend as well) and a manjaw indicating testosterone overload (see pics of Stewart), then you had better have really tight dread game. Or be comfortable sharing her with other alphas.

UPDATE

As if on cue, commenter Pffft provides evidence in support of YaReally’s theory:

Pattinson is beta. Otherwise why would Stewart have said this?

“I feel boring. I feel like, Why is everything so easy for me? I can’t wait for something crazy to fucking happen to me. Just life. I want someone to fuck me over! Do you know what I mean?”

Yeah, we know what you mean, Kristen, you just needed an alpha to fuck you over, and Pattinson wasn’t doing it. He was sweet, nice, and wanted to marry you. Awwwww……

Robert Pattinson wept poetic beta tears. Luckily for him, his fame ensures his alphaness almost… ALMOST… completely compensates for his niceguy beta soul. (I say “almost”, because all it takes is one higher status director and one unruly, bored hypergamous whore to fuck up his dreamy-eyed visions of monogamous romance.) He’ll get over it with a quick public jaunt down the street to pick up fresh meat. Most cuckolded beta males without his fame or options never get over it.

Isn’t biomechanics fun? One look at a girl’s heavily jutting jaw and you know she has a better than average chance of screwing around on you. If only poor, idealistic, romantic, rumored gay Robert had this information in hand before deciding to remain faithful to Kristen. He could’ve juggled multiple long-term relationships with a bevy of babes and not felt any guilt over breaking a hypergamous slut’s heart.

As time goes on, men will find a rebirth and renaissance in reading the Great Books and Classics in their original language, or in translations penned before 1950. For the bible I recommend the KJVB, or, if you must, the NKJVB. The Judeo-Christian tradition contains man’s greatest assets–his greatest myths–the very souls and spirits of his exalted fathers–their trials and tribulations–their exalted advice on women, marriage, justice, money, and life. Beside your bible, keep a copy of Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey and Socrates’ Apology, for you will find that they have far more in common than not.

The Bible begins with Moses’ heroic, physical journey–liberating his people from the corrupt King. On the first page of the Iliad, Achilles rebels against his corrupt King. Both Moses and Achilles appeared to exalted Natural Law–of Zeus and Yahweh–and tough Mill and Locke would expound upon Natural Rights millennia later, Jefferson referenced not Mill and Locke, but our Creator in the Declaration of Independence. Indeed–liberty’s poet Thomas Jefferson wrote, “As we advance in life, they all fall off, one by one, until we are left with Virgil and Homer, and perhaps Homer alone.”

So fellas, go forth and read Shakespeare and the Bible as the Men that You Are. Read Homer and Virgil. Exalt in your classical, Judeo-Christain Heritage, for it was paid for in blood, sweat, and tears, and then given freely, to you.

And as Dalrock points out in the above video, understand that you will be attacked–often to the degree that you serve the spirit of Socrates and Jesus who internalized the external voyages of Moses and Achilles and blazed the hero’s journey of the spirit–understand that you will be attacked and persecuted by the false prophets, pedants, scribes, and pharisees–by the state officials who wash their hands while the feminist scribes author your crucifixion.

And remember, that even Jesus lost faith at the end. After the chief scribes and pharisees persuaded the people to free the murderous sinner Barabbas and leave Jesus to die, in the same way they do today, Jesus asked, “My God, My God, why has thou foresaken me?”

One can easily imagine the following playing out in our own time, with the controlling feminist’s/woman’s/corporation’s/university’s/mob’s preference for the perverse and sinful–for the debauched and degraded:

27:20 But the chief priests and elders persuaded the multitude that they should ask Barabbas (the murderer/buttcocker), and destroy Jesus.
27:21 The governor answered and said unto them, Whether of the twain will ye that I release unto you? They said, Barabbas.
27:22 Pilate saith unto them, What shall I do then with Jesus which is called Christ? They all say unto him, Let him be crucified.
27:23 And the governor said, Why, what evil hath he done? But they cried out the more, saying, Let him be crucified.
27:24 When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.
27:25 Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.
27:26 Then released he Barabbas unto them: and when he had scourged Jesus, he delivered him to be crucified.
27:27 Then the soldiers of the governor took Jesus into the common hall, and gathered unto him the whole band of soldiers.
27:28 And they stripped him, and put on him a scarlet robe.
27:29 And when they had platted a crown of thorns, they put it upon his head, and a reed in his right hand: and they bowed the knee before him, and mocked him, saying, Hail, King of the Jews!
27:30 And they spit upon him, and took the reed, and smote him on the head.
27:31 And after that they had mocked him, they took the robe off from him, and put his own raiment on him, and led him away to crucify him.
27:32 And as they came out, they found a man of Cyrene, Simon by name: him they compelled to bear his cross.
27:33 And when they were come unto a place called Golgotha, that is to say, a place of a skull,
27:34 They gave him vinegar to drink mingled with gall: and when he had tasted thereof, he would not drink.
27:35 And they crucified him, and parted his garments, casting lots: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, They parted my garments among them, and upon my vesture did they cast lots.
27:36 And sitting down they watched him there;
27:37 And set up over his head his accusation written, THIS IS JESUS THE KING OF THE JEWS.
27:38 Then were there two thieves crucified with him, one on the right hand, and another on the left.
27:39 And they that passed by reviled him, wagging their heads,
27:40 And saying, Thou that destroyest the temple, and buildest it in three days, save thyself. If thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross.
27:41 Likewise also the chief priests mocking him, with the scribes and elders, said,
27:42 He saved others; himself he cannot save. If he be the King of Israel, let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe him.
27:43 He trusted in God; let him deliver him now, if he will have him: for he said, I am the Son of God.
27:44 The thieves also, which were crucified with him, cast the same in his teeth.
27:45 Now from the sixth hour there was darkness over all the land unto the ninth hour.
27:46 And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?

Now think about that. Jesus Christ–the man who has single-handedly influenced and exalted Western Civilization and the World as no other, lost faith in God in his final moments.

Aye, but let us explore one layer deeper, as we realize that “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” is but the beginning of the famous Psalm 22:1:

We don’t hear the rest, as Jesus has passed through the other side, but yet, we know what Jesus is saying, as we continue on in Psalm 23:

23 The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want.
2 He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me beside the still waters.
3 He restoreth my soul: he leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for his name’s sake.
4 Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.

What this means Men, is that as long as you hold true to your ideals, the false prophets and apologists have no power over you, neither in life, nor death. For as Jesus, the King of Ideals stated, “My Kingdom is not of this world.”

Thanks again to Dalrock and Heartiste for bringing those classical, exalted ideals to life with with and humor, day in and day out.

“Better sleep with a sober cannibal than a drunken Christian.” -Herman Melvill

To any gamers around or those of you who want your kids/brothers/etc not play emasculated feminist games in a few years: support the reaction campaign against the 160k $ campaign of feminist anita sarkeesian. Those guys only want 3k $ which they will donate to male-related cancer research. Source: http://www.indiegogo.com/misandryinvideogames

Y’know, of all the fields of human endeavour which I worry about becoming overly feminized, I think video games is pretty safe for now.

Not that I think many video games have main characters who are positive male role models by any means. Nathan Drake is an ass, Duke Nukem is a parody, and the Gears of Wars guys are some gamma male’s grunting, 80-inch-chested fantasy of what a strong man might be like. Geeky programmers can’t imagine what an ideal man would be like — it takes an Ian Fleming to imagine a James Bond.

Consider that moron Houston in Colorado. An clear omega, zero social skills….but he’s probably already getting love letters from across the country. If he’s able to marry in prison and have conjugal visits, he’ll finally end up getting some ass.

The whole problem with Sarkeesian’s work is that it’s trite and unpleasant. The only reason she has an audience is that she waves the feminist flag and they love her bitchy, “rebellious” attitude. A man trying to to do a reverse study is going to fail because no one paying attention gives a shit about the evidence.

The problem with her work is that it shows how biased and politikally korrect has society became. Hell, kotaku used the hacked page of the project as a proof that the initiators of the campaign are trolls. I imagine some omega white knight hackers getting wet by preparing that shit.
“Trolling” says gaming media. Compared to who? To someone getting 160k (probably male hookers and make-up – it still doesn’t work, anita) and not saying where the money goes and pigeon-holing every female character (even from Powerpuff Girls – I mean come on) while shouting “male privilege” every minute? Folly of the masses™ – legitimating stupidity since the dawn of time.

the feminists and video game fanboys are two sides of da same coin
both are violent
both deisrepestc both god and mans zlzozo
while da fanboy mashes buttons in his single mom’s basement
killing hookers and going zlzozlozozozoz
da feminist mashes buttons and kills unborn babiez
aborting her fetushsthes
when women run publishing houseszz
such as simon and shuscter sodom and scheister
they publish bullies and liars nd secretive tapers of butthext
like tucker max rhymes with goldman sax
who tapes analbutthext without da girths content
when when men ran publishing houses
they published melville hemingway fitzgeraldz zlzozozozo

feminists fan the flames and funds da scerive tapers of bputthext and publish and profit off them
then they write legislation against good men, citing the actions of the buttcockers who they voluntarily publish promote nd let into their anuthesz zlzozozo

“Patent applications let people dream big. Someone out there’s got a killer idea for the Litter Box of the Future or fart-proof underwear. There may be hundreds of hurdles to cross before any such thing gets made, but a patent lets them plant a flag in the land of unclaimed ideaspace.

With video games, the patents we hear about concern themselves mostly with technology and features. Applications for controller, networking and display components get filed long before hardware gets manufactured. Some of that stuff never comes to pass and even for tech giants like Apple or Sony, patents sometimes speak more to aspiration than anything actually executable.

McGucken’s personal website paints him to be a multidisciplinary renaissance man whose work binds together hard science, classic literature and cutting-edge technology. Paging through the application’s flowcharts gives you a taste of the philosophy at work here, but it’s only by digging through the mounds of text that you’ll encounter anti-establishment vocabulary words like fiatocracy. The patent aims to put McGucken’s hero’s journey mythology ideas into a video game where the fictional construct responds to your actions. Not that weird, you say?

Well, McGucken’s would-be game would have players to killing Communist vampires and quoting Scripture, Homer or the Constitution to save the world from serfdom. The game’s enemies get listed as a hybrid of Communist, the Matrix, Sauron and Scottish nobles. Click the excerpts above to expand and read the whole thing here.

A video game method and system for creating games where ideas have consequences, incorporating branching paths that correspond to a player’s choices, wherein paths correspond to decisions founded upon ideals, resulting in exalted games with deeper soul and story, enhanced characters and meanings, and exalted gameplay. The classical hero’s journey may be rendered, as the journey hinges on choices pivoting on classical ideals. Ideas that are rendered in word and deed will have consequences in the gameworld. Historical events such as The American Revolution may be brought to life, as players listen to famous speeches and choose sides. As great works of literature and dramatic art center around characters rendering ideals real, both internally and externally, in word and deed, in love and war, the present invention will afford video games that exalt the classical soul, as well as the great books, classics, and epic films—past, present, and future.

1. A method for creating video games and virtual realities wherein ideas have consequences.

2. The method in claim 1 where said ideas are rooted in classical, epic precepts such as those found in the Great Books and Classics, and exalted at the pinnacles of Western culture and history.

3. The method in claim 1 where said ideas are manifested in the words the player or non-player characters, write, speak, read, disseminate, congregate about, fight for, and/or associate with.

4. The method in claim 1 where said ideas are manifested in the actions the player, non-player characters, and/or monsters act out.

5. The method in claim 1 where said ideas spread like viruses, by being spoken, written, or disseminated in some other manner, transforming characters who come in contact with said ideas into vampires, zombies, or other forms of monsters.

6. The method in claim 1 where said ideas spread like viruses, by being spoken, written, or disseminated in some other manner, transforming characters who come in contact with said ideas into vampires, zombies, or other forms of monsters, and where said vampires, zombies, and monsters may be saved or converted back to normal by coming in contact with ideas that oppose the ideas that made them vampires, zombies, and other forms of monsters.

7. The method in claim 1 where said ideas must be fought for via words and dialogue, before they have exalted consequences.

8. The method in claim 1 where said ideas must be fought for via deeds and actions, before they have exalted consequences.

9. The method in claim 1 where the player can fight for said ideas in word and deed, and witness the exalted consequences of those ideals, including liberty, freedom, and justice, when they succeed, and the dire consequences of tyranny, domination, and intimidation, when they fail to render exalted ideas, as ideas have consequences.

10. The method in claim 1 where the character can fight for said ideas such as marriage, the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and right to life in word and deed, and witness the exalted consequences of those ideals, including a stable and enduring society should they succeed, and a declining, bankrupt civilization, should they fail.

11. The method in claim 1 where the character can battle for said ideas that are based upon classical moral and economic principles of famous philosophers, prophets, poets, statesmen, and economists including Plato, Moses, Jesus, Gandhi Sun Tzu, Buda, Jefferson, Aristotle, F. A. Hayek, Martin Luther King Jr., Homer, Ludwig Von Mises, Adam Smith, and others, and witness the consequences of both their success and failure of their battle, as the consequences are rendered in the game’s physical world.

12. The method in claim 1 where the character can battle for said ideas via both word and deed, using a combination of words and action, witnessing the consequences of their balance between word and deed, between reasoning and partaking in violence, thusly bringing to life epic classical works of film and literature wherein the hero must balance word and deed.

13. The method in claim 1 where fighting for said ideas in word and/or deed will have consequences regarding the operation of a weapon, which will operate at its full potential for the players and characters who are the most successful in serving ideals and ideas, and rendering them in word and deed.

14. The method in claim 1 wherein said ideas may be based upon Constitutional ideals and ideas underlying the American Founding, including the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, sound currency, the right to bear arms, the freedom of speech, the right of the artist, author, and inventor to own their creations and inventions; and wherein the player could fight for sound money in word and deed and witness the consequences of their successes and failures, including liberty, wealth creation, capitalism, freedom, private property, peace, and prosperity or rapid inflation, deflation, theft via the inflation tax, massive debt, empire, long lines, wealth transfer to the rich, depressions, corruption, and war.

15. The method in claim 1 where the said ideas will be supported or opposed by in-game characters, and the player will have to choose how to interact with the said in-game characters, based on their ideas, including but not limited to whether or not to befriend them, agree with them, disagree with them, ignore them, recruit them, shoot them, save them, judge them, or forgive them.

16. The method in claim 1 where the said ideas are based upon the pivotal plot points of the great books and classics.

17. The method in claim 1 where said ideas spread like viruses, by being spoken, written, or disseminated in some other manner, transforming characters who come in contact with said ideas into vampires, zombies, or other forms of monsters; and when bad ideas have infected too many in-game characters, the consequences are dire, including the loss of life, liberty, happiness, freedom, and security.

18. The method in claim 1 wherein said ideas may be related to economics and monetary policy, and wherein the player could fight for sound money in words echoing the classical economists and deed and witness the consequences of their successes and failures, including liberty, freedom, peace and prosperity or rapid inflation, deflation, theft via the inflation tax, massive debt, empire, long lines, depressions, corruption, and war.

19. The method in claim 1 wherein moral ideas have moral consequences in the evolution of the gameworld.

20. The method in claim 1 where said ideas in the video game world are founded upon the natural ideas and ideals occurring at the plot points in great works of literature and film where a character must choose whether to serve an ideal or not serve an ideal, thusly rendering or not rendering ideals real by their actions, and influencing the greater outcome and state of the game world, as ideas have consequences.

21. The method in claim 1 where said ideas in the video game world are used to exalt the classic hero’s journey, and where a player’s success and progress at every stage or step or plot point of said hero’s journey is defined by said player’s service or disservice to said ideas and ideals, and where by said player’s serving said ideas and classical ideals, said hero’s journey advances towards ultimate victory and triumph, while by said character’s failing to serve said ideas and classical ideals, progress in said hero’s journey is retarded or reversed.

Does anyone know f she was into high school sports? I once read that men’s square jawline emerges in puberty when there is a rush of testosterone. My theory is that the epidemic of manjaws is the result f women gong into sports in middle and high school and getting that rush of adrenaline while they are developing. Keep women out of sports for their own good!

Watch one interview of Pattinson and Stewart and see his approval seeking behavior. He defers to her, glances at her constantly, wide bambi eyes, never disagrees, never redirects the interview, never sets the frame.

Teenagers want to fit in somewhat with their peer group. Having high status in their group is appreciated, but being completely removed/above is not something most teens are comfortable with.

If you’re born looking like Robert Pattinson, that means acting to tone down your girl appeal. Running anti game, so to speak.

Manners and politeness, aka beta behavior, were invented and practiced by those with obviously high status for similar, if more generalized, reasons. As was the traditional taboo against beating up cripples, women and children.

Kristen Stewart is an attractive woman with the empty affect of a typical female college student in the 21st century. When a girl is brought up from birth as an entitled princess, of which she is an exemplar, it retards the development of personality. She is 22.

As a further handicap, Stewart broke into fame as an exceptionally pretty young girl. (See PanicRoom, preteen, or Zathura, midteen.) Puberty wasn’t devastating on her ingenue cuteness, but it took its toll just before beginning her 20s-slide toward the wall. So she debuted with a reputation for untouchable attractiveness and gradually grew into a relative plainness compared to the looks that launched her career. Most every woman loses her youthful pulchritude, but Stewart is undergoing the transformation step-by-step in the public eye. Since we are not allowed to notice this deterioration of grace — especially in aging celebrities — Stewart is an above-average girl saddled with a reputation for stunning movie-star looks.

On the other hand, Stewart’s blank affect was perfect for the role that made her career, Bella Swan, who was Stephenie Meyer’s empty canvass upon which millions of women could project themselves. Ironically, Stewart herself is traveling the reverse path of the “Swan” in real life, going from cute little girl to regular young adult. Notwithstanding the ugly-duckling phenomenon, beauty is “Time’s fool,” where “rosy lips and cheeks / Within his bending sickle’s compass come.”

The Twilight films are archetypes for our age. They should be studied as anthropological objets d’art, simply perfect specimens of the SMP as seen through schoolgirls’ (and aging schoolgirls’) eyes. I don’t think there are better, more highly produced, or more visceral examples of modern woman’s romantic expectations, reduced to their core fantasy. The books are nothing compared to the immersive experience of film. To call them porn for girls is to underestimate their totalizing hypnotic power. Stewart was born to play Swan.

I’ve seen a teenage girl enter what seemed to be an honest-to-God hypnotic trance when Twilight was mentioned. Her eyes grew wide; she froze in place; she literally lost the ability to speak.

Boys like Holmes create secret worlds of violence; girls like her create secret worlds of romance. Twilight was the latest key to open that door.

Nice point about suppressed personalities in princess types (Kimmy K, anybody?), but I don’t think that flat affects are unique to our era. Look at an old sepia photo of a family portrait or a church picnic circa 1900. You’ll see grim faces, one and all.

Thanks for the context, Matt. I didn’t know that Stewart had acted before Twilight. You’re right, she looks damn good in that Zathura clip. She has more facial expressions than in Twilight, too. Hard to believe it’s the same girl.

The girl is not “hot” she’s quite mediocre. And the beta guy (Pattison? I can’t remember their names) that you guys keep calling “good looking” is no such thing. I don’t think he’s good looking at all, and I like men.

Nice guy? I don’t give a shit. Good father? Fuck you! Go home and play with your kids. You wanna fuck me – alpha up and treat me like a worthless whore! You think this is abuse? You think this is abuse, you cocksucker? You can’t take this, how can you take the abuse you get when I’m on the rag?

alpha fucks and beta bucks
dat is how we roll
da butthexting cockass we fucks and sucks
and in our anuthes it doth deosul
alpha fucks and beta bucks
it is da way of da fed
to transfer assetss to dose who butthext
cuckold dose who pay for our bread
beta bucks and alpha fucks
it’s what day teach us we;’re entitled too
da assetts from betas we plucks
after da alphas desol us through our hole for poo
lzozozlzzolzlzlzlz
cuckold da betas cockhold da alphas
datsz what day taught us in mba grad school
as da feiisnsits see no truth nor justice in their laws
and say da great books for menz was all fools.
yes, yes, i did very good on my gmats
dey bernenakifed my soul away, left me with cats

You know, this assumption that you can pretend something has been asked and answered doesn’t work if you never really answered in the first place. Such as with the persistent idea that you have conclusively schooled social conservatism as unintentional beta supporters of feminism. Criticizing some aspects of male behavior does not make one automatically sympathetic to the feminist agenda, much less allies to the cause of destroying men.

Even worse is the reduction of this unearned pose to a single-word tautology, “biomechanics.”

You are a gaggle of ducks quacking in imitation of your master, who himself skipped over the part between asserting a factoid and relying on it to support a practicable theory. That middle part is: proving the factoid as, you know, factual. I thought this was a forum for men, where the received wisdom is presented, challenged, and found legitimate or illegitimate, rather than an echo chamber of vacuous cheerleaders squealing the same chants.

in william bennets book of man, he leaves out the heart and soul of western civilization. a better name for bennet’s book would have been, “the book of fanboy manginas.”

bennet ignores the central, exalted message of genesis, and then ups the ante by debauching and debasing the iliad faster than a neocon can debase a dollar to fund the perpetual warfare/welfare state. to top it all off, bennet ignores the most-decorated war veteran of all time.

completely absent from bennet’s book is the awesome work of the jews in genesis:

14 And the Lord God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:

15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

in the classical, judeo-christian, chivalric context, a man would man up as he would be guaranteed, a non-asscocked, chaste woman who be shamed out of not acting on and serving every gina tingle and butt tingle. instead of serving her butt and gina tingles, a woman would be expected to serve god, man, and family. for this, she would be honored in a civilized context.

completely absent from bennet’s book is the divine RAGE of ACHILLES–the very center and circumference of homer’s iliad. achilles is robbed of his prize and property by his commander, and so, his anger ignited, achilles quits the greek army in the first showdown between man and state. zeus sides with achilles, exalting the Natural Law that John Locke and Thomas Jefferson would someday exalt in their respective poetry. achilles rages as he reasons, “if i’m the one fighting, doing all the work, why are you getting all the rewards?” indeed, so might a marine wonder these days, if he’s taking all the risks for a few hundred dollars a month, why does bill bennet get to sit back home in vegas, gambling millions away? so it is that bill bennet is working for the fiat bankers in all his blustering books, which serve far more to debauch and desecrate–to contort and confuse–than they do to exalt and enlighten. why isn’t bill bennet telling all the army-wives to “woman up” and stp with the buttcocking adultery, and serve their men with loyalty as Yahweh commands them to, and as Penelope does in Homer’s Odyssey? It’s because bennet is well-paid in fiat dollar to hate on home and the bible.

finally, bill bennet, who “never buckled on armor nor suited up for ballte” in the words of achilles, also ignores the most-decorated general of our own era:

[quote]
“War is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small ‘inside’ group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.”
In another often cited quote from the book Butler says:
I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.
[/quote] –http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Is_a_Racket –War Is a Racket is the title of two works, a speech and a booklet, by retired United States Marine Corps Major General and two time Medal of Honor recipient Smedley D. Butler. In them, Butler frankly discusses from his experience as a career military officer how business interests commercially benefit from warfare.

Compare warrior Smedley’s words to those of Achilles, who also questions teh utility of war:

[quote]
Ulysses, noble son of Laertes, I should give you formal notice plainly and in all fixity of purpose that there be no more of this cajoling, from whatsoever quarter it may come. Him do I hate even as the gates of hell who says one thing while he hides another in his heart; therefore I will say what I mean. I will be appeased neither by Agamemnon son of Atreus nor by any other of the Danaans, for I see that I have no thanks for all my fighting. He that fights fares no better than he that does not; coward and hero are held in equal honour, and death deals like measure to him who works and him who is idle. I have taken nothing by all my hardships- with my life ever in my hand; as a bird when she has found a morsel takes it to her nestlings, and herself fares hardly, even so man a long night have I been wakeful, and many a bloody battle have I waged by day against those who were fighting for their women. With my ships I have taken twelve cities, and eleven round about Troy have I stormed with my men by land; I took great store of wealth from every one of them, but I gave all up to Agamemnon son of Atreus. He stayed where he was by his ships, yet of what came to him he gave little, and kept much himself.
[/quote]

And so you see why the gambling, warmongering, chicken-hawk, mysandric, soulless Bennett is calling upon men to man up while debauching and deconstructing their heritage–it is because, at the fiat baneker’s behest, he needs the men to take all the risk, while bennet and the fiat bankers get all the rewards, celebrating their conquest of other men’s wives with the famous buttocker and secretive taper of butthext tucker max rhymes with goldman sax, who the weekly standard casts as a six-foot tall hero, repeating the butthexer’s lies, while ignoring the true, selfless heroism of those Achilles and Smedley Butlers fighting and dying on foreign shores in foreign wars.

OHH. Here is the riposte to Bennett and social conservatism. It is no longer any mystery why you tools are comfortable being consigned to the cultural ghetto.

You can either make an argument yourselves, or you can pretend that somewhere in GBFM’s cryptic prolixity lies justification for your every prejudice.

That’s great, except you will be treated just as seriously as GBFM is, i.e., ignored as the detritus of internet pamphleteers. For all of this site’s bragging about having an influence on the mainstream, it is one-tenth what it should be. It has more talent than all the MRA sites put together, with a fraction of the earnest spade-work necessary for any sustained effort, and none of the ability/humility to translate into a language adoptable by mainstream fence-sitters.

So you rant by yourselves, at yourselves, for yourselves in your creepy, incestuous household at the dead-end of the street.

You mean like deliberately misspelled Cafe Press mock-ups that read like the Zodiac killer if he had a weird hard-on for Bernanke and a Mortimer Adler library card?

Look, I am not making any claim to comparable talent or potential for influence. I am pointing out the waste of obvious skill through a mistaken strategy. (Or in your case, the waste of talent through an insecure anxiety against writing with clarity.) An ability to rally the troops has nothing to do with the righteousness of the mission for which they were rallied.

I wouldn’t say moderate your tone or drop the pseudonymity. But I would say don’t write-off those who share your mission by demonizing every little distinction without difference. Success comes from rallying those who overlap with you even 1% to join you in the cause of addressing that 1% goal-in-common, rather than alienating them for employing the tones of moderation necessary to reach broader audiences and influence. Not every divergence in strategy is an insult to principle to be purged from the cause as heretical.

If Bill Bennett started using words like “femmcunt” and “asscocking” would that be sufficient proof of fellow-feeling for you? Might he share your contempt for feminism but refrain from your style for strategic reasons you haven’t considered? Does it matter to a temporary alliance against the most proximate and acute injustices of feminism what his opinion on Bretton Woods is?

Great leaders make mutually beneficial bonds and forge friendships with erstwhile and would-be enemies; that is how they gain a comprehensive influence. They are not petty and cramp-minded, burning every bridge that leads to their dank subterranean hovels. Look for the areas through which you can fashion alliances, even if they are narrow, rather than fresh apostasies to condemn and pat yourselves on the back for. Leadership is an art, not a witch hunt against less-than-perfect undesirables against which you impotently rage.

frist of all, da government always lies about the true inflation lozozozl but you see it at the gas pump as day pump and dump your future wife in college deosuling and ebenrnkaifiying her

A LOT OF INFLATION is hidden in your future wife’s buttonhole lzozlzoz

with all da extra dolzlrz zlzozo day print dollars and fund feminism and sassockcing lessons as socking seminars assockcing instructions on da college campus where day can butthext and deosul your future wife and make her loyal first and foremost to da bottom line lzozozl da BOTTOM line lzozozoz da BOTTOM UTTHOLE line lzozozlzl programming her to seize your assets to tempt you into marriage, seize your assets and spy on you, and then forward all your emails to da FED alongside all of your assettsts ASS tests ASSsetts zlzozzzlz BOOTOTOM LINE BOTTOM LINE ASSests zlzozozllzozoz

once upon a time a man couple support a family and a wife and kids and rise them proper moral decent lzozllzoz

but now, due to da FED’s massive inflation which they hide in your wife’s buttonhole during secretive tucker max rheyme with godlmans sax secretly taped buttehxting sessions, she will be more loyal to da shopping channels and her sista’s and the CIA’s cosmo magazine zlozozzllzzol and unloyal not loyal to family, god , man, religion, and thus she will insatiate initiate over 80% of divorce as the FED whispers to her that she will get her uhusdbansds assetsts to fund future as socking as socking buttonhole cockas sessions that they addickecter adduced adDICKted her to in college lzoolzlzozo

and da fed gets a gut

as they must convert

worthless less than zero fiat debt

into physical assetttss

by seizing property and lifer and liberty form da betas

operating through their wive’s buttholios

where they dhid allda inflation zlozozozlz

DANTE and MILTON noted the same thing, so if you do not believe da GBFM, take it up with DANTE and MILTON asslcocen zlzzzl assclowns zlzozlzlzo

I never noticed manjaws on females, but now I see how ugly and unfeminine they really are.
Same with fat chicks. I was indifferent, now I find them disgusting. Overplaying this kind of stuff really strenghtens the blog’s message.

Joe-you’re dealing with a lot of geeky kids here who will grasp at any straw to convince themselves that they are not just natural losers with females. They believe in magic, luck and “game” which is taught to them by another loser in a dollar store floppy hat.They like to delude themselves with this “game” nonsense because they believe it’s something that they can learn which will be so effective that it will trump all of their other negative immutable characteristics.And while you may not have to be the best looking man or the wealthiest to get top women you still have to have some good physical traits and other qualities and not just a bunch of pick up lines, negs or other kid bullshit. When their failproof “game” doesn’t work with a female they go into the sour grapes mode with this manjaw crap and other pop psych junk they picked up on one of the million pseudo science blogs on the net.
These gamer boys obviously are such big losers that they can’t even see that half the population is made up of females and it really doesn’t take much effort to get a girl to have sex with you. They are little video game playing nerds who think that they are entitled to the top females while being themselves 5’4″, working at MickyD’s and living at home with mama.
They will be in for a very rude awakening in the real world outside their basement.

Yes you’re right. I think that there is just a lot of bitter sour grapes from these Omega minus boys on here. They would get down on their knees and salivate and beg like Pavlov’s dog just to lick this girl’s toes :)

Although Pattison can act like an aloof alpha like he did it in Cosmopolis, he is very beta because he has access to the highest quality of women and he doesn’t take the opportunity. Kirsten Stewart is like a 4 in the showbiz industry!

I think she is very average and that is the reason they picked her for the Twilight series: a girl that every other woman could relate to. This Cosmopolitan grade gossip is so uninteresting it that I feel obliged to leave a comment stating that fact! Who gives a shit about this?!

I have made a Twilight routine:

Are you team Edward or team Jacob?

When she answers team Jacob: There is still hope for you.

When she answers team Edward: This conversation is over. (Pause)

Then say: 2 years ago I went to the movies almost every week, my girlfriend at the time always let me pick the movie. At one time she said we had the right to go see Twilight. After a lot of insisting I gave in and we went to see the 2nd movie of the Twilight series. This was in Germany, the movie was dubbed and the theater was full of schoolgirls for the premiere. In the first 20 minutes of the movie Jacob takes off his shirt and all girls start moaning and the guys think that the guy has a cool body. Then, almost at the end of the movie, in Italy, Edward wants to show his body with little sparkles, he takes off his gay robe and the whole theater starts laughing at the sad scene where he looks like a wimp, he had sprayed on abs. That is not a man, it’s pale fake abbed man!

This is plain stupid. Historically, many famous men were faithful to their spouses, although they could have done any amount of philandering & no one would have stopped them (Rubens, Tolstoy, Marx, Robert Browning, ,,). It’s about moral personality, not Greek alphabet.

Robert Pattison had this coming. Sure, he’s got some height (6’1″) but he’s slim. His body is composed of more estrogen than masculinity.

I saw Breaking Dawn part 1 with a female friend (no, she’s too butch to bang) and his acting made me go to the bathroom to splash water over my head. Seriously, I wanted to punch the screen because he was doing whatever she wanted.

I told myself when walking out of the theater “God, I hope it was just an act. Hope he’s more of a dick in life”. But apparently, nope. He wanted to marry Kristen.

And by the way guys, his betaness hasn’t left. Why? BECAUSE HE PACKED UP AND LEFT THE HOUSE THEY WERE LIVING IN. Holy shit Rob, you’re gonna let her take the place while you find a new one to live?

His status will attract him more females (I mean afterall, he’s got money). But if he doesn’t change himself over and adopt a more masculine approach, he’s gonna have more girlfriends put him in the friend zone or cheat on him. It’s bound to happen … which is what he may very well need until he takes charge and dominates the relationship.

“Stewart commented not too long ago that her life was too easy and too boring. Guess the only way she was able to inject some interest in her life was to foul up someone’s marriage.”

–> Agreed with this. I mean afterall, you could tell how BORED she is through her acting roles. I saw Snow White, and I was bored shit of it. Nothing exciting happened.

I don’t know about Omar Sharif. Doctor Zhivago is one of my favorite films and he’s actually pretty beta in it. He’s an accidental alpha and loved both of the women in his life deeply and would never have mistreated either of them. Rod Steiger’s character, Kamerovsky, on the other hand, is more consistent with the values of this blog.

Game knowledge would be as illuminating to them as anyone else. Most of them are clueless about what turns women on.

But it’s definitely true that many non-westerners don’t take whites seriously because of our weakness with women and our stupid equalist ideology.
It’s obvious in Europe, most foreigners sense the weakness of nancyboy leftie whites. They think that the vast majority of white men are like that. And they may be right.

That’s because the leftist nancyboy whites get their opinions plastered all over the public sphere, while the alpha whites have to confine their opinions to the bars, private parties, blogs, and women they fuck.

I have lived in Beijng and am dating Iranian girl. I can say that the betaness of westerners is pretty overstated on this site. East Asians are so beta it hurts (yes, obviously there are always exceptions). There were actually many Africans in Beijing, and while not as beta the Chinese, always came off as extremely desperate and were perhaps the worst ‘last-call bottom feeders’ I have ever seen. Apparantly Africans often ask girls to marry them within a week.

Middle-Eastern men – who seem to be lauded by everyone here – are pretty bad too. The Iranian girl’s cousin once broke into sobbing hysterics when he got drunk and thought about his ex. The Arabs that went to my large West Coast university all drove nice cars, ACTED alpha, and wore their Armani Exchange and still never got laid. There is a difference between disrespecting women and being Alpha.

Enlist, or go attempt to shoot a documentary in Afghanistan. 8+ kids per woman. And guys who, even at the age of 15 wouldn’t flinch at massacring entire villages, on account of some village mate’s daughter being violated.

The Middle Easterners you meet in America, tend to suffer from inferiority complexes, just like most other non Western immigrants. Most of them have bought hook, line and sinker the progressive nonsense about their own culture being somehow less sophisticated because they’re women aren’t sufficiently liberated/slutty/whorish and whatnot. That’s why their women are such easy pickings for Western looking guys.

Feh. If you’re an immigrant, your social skills always take a hit, because you have to adapt to a different culture. Cultural distance matters–it’s harder for a Middle Easterner than a Canadian, of course–and cultures with similar values do better (Israelis seem to get more poon than Chinese because they have no shame, beta Ashkenazi genes or not).

So being alpha is throwing acid into the face of a woman who wants to fly a kite? Getting married at 16 and having a bunch of kids? Killing people?

I hate feminism as much as the next guy, but just because Sweden is a feminist hellhole doesn’t mean Afghanistan or Saudi Arabia is the answer.

Most Arabs/Indians come off as extremely creepy, because they can do whatever they want in their countries and women can’t mercilessly shoot down their advances like in the west. A lot of middle-eastern men are extremely bitter about this in America. If they have an accent, they have almost a zero percent chance with a non-Middle Eastern woman. I would say they have a tougher time in America than Asian guys with regards to women (I don’t know what the case is in Europe).

Once again, afghanistan and saudi arabia are not the arab/muslim world. It wouldn’t be excessive to say that they’re the exception, not the rule. North africa, lebanon, uae, syria before shtf etc… are all moderate countries where acid attacks and other CNN stereotypes seldom if ever occur.

Getting married at 16 and having a bunch of kids is called common sense. If you like marrying cougars or post-college twenty-somethings who graduated in cock-carousel hopping because you know, a girl has to grow up and find her true self sucking random cocks, be my guest.

Check out other muslim countries. Generalization makes you seem like an ignorant redneck. No offense.

For most jihad-fantasizing muslims it is… hogging all the women and having sevnty-five children while every other guy’s reduced to blowing himself up fot the 72 virgins (in case you wonder why the fuck each other/little boys and/or goats until then).

Biologically, being alpha is getting ones genes propagated. In gamedom, being alpha is getting laid. The latter is highly situational.

If our host’s contention that in the West, 10% of men get all the women, while 90% get none, I’d be surprised if the median Afghan guy aren’t out-alphaing his counterpart in the west by the game metric.

Biologically, there’s not even a contest.

And just as Obama was (for once in his life) right when he implied the guy who happen to own any given company, didn’t singlehandledly, with no aid from “society”, “create that”, a good heaping of whatever alphatude Western men do have across the world, is inherited. A reputation for wealth, Hollywood and the fashion industry spreading images of how “leading men” are supposed to look (and how, in the case of Middle Easterners, how creepy villains, who inevitably lose in the end, are supposed to look) etc., etc. constitutes a heritage bequeathed to all Western men, by the hard work of generations whose mores were much closer to contemporary Afghan ones than they are today. (For those who are a bit slow; while female beauty is largely physically determined, male looks, aka looking like an alpha, is greatly influenced by social conditioning.)

That’s how they dealt with hypergamy (the pimp way… “Bitch better have my money!”) and it’s worked for them as far as they like… but, bear in mind, they still want to party like it’s 799 and have to buy all the weapons/technology from somewhere else. Being “da man” takes up all of their time when they’re not out jihading. We dealt with it through morals and character… now that left/liberals have destroyed those, Sharia Game may have more of an audience here, too.

and as divorce and adultery oft runz higher amongst “good christinaz,” we might put all da bibles in the club tavernz and open it on sunday morning and put all da hiphop techno in da church with da kegeratorz and top-shelf vodkas and jack danielzz lzozozoz and have firday and saturday night sermonz in da church dancing and buttcocking all night longz, which wuld be par for the course and less offensive to today’s liberated church minstearz zlzozlzozo

The genious who has the inner toughness shouldn’t be under estimated. After learning game I see that our oldest Son’s best friend has it. Quiet, unassuming. You would pass him walking not even noticing him. Apparentently Uncle Sam also saw it. If I ever get him to talk about it, it should be an interesting story. I guess that I should have clued in when his gf’s in school were magnitudes more attractive than he was.

Sure as shit, too… grew up where if you said you were gonna “kill” somebody you’d better damn well mean it, not shoot your mouth off like an idiot 12-year-old to be seen as “bold” and having “potential” (paging Dr. Mystery, non-suburbanite in da house… )

Robert got lucky. Didn’t marry and without children there won’t be any alimony nor child support.

*phew*

I don’t know if that was a close call on his case, but it came really, really cheap. Kristen exposed herself for the thrill of it, fact that doesn’t make it any easier on Robert, but it was actually his duty to detect her infidelity.

If he’s a beta on the inside and an alpha (as I believe he is) on the outside, damn, he only needs to fix like 50% tops. That ain’t much. If he now goes on a pussy roulette, cheers for him!

I doubt he ever goes on a pussy rampage. He’s the romantic soul-mate type who doesn’t believe in sex without feelings.

Odds are high that he’s gonna get back to that whore, and break up after a few months or years. If he does not read this blog by then, he’s gonna repeat the same shit with another hollywood slut, and spend his life as the eternal cuckold that his genes and upbringing designed him to be.

I have yareally’s situation with an overpampered hot girl going to extremes to get attention/create drama/find discipline. His description is spot-on. I overgamed the girl in earlier states which produced a wicked distortion of her personality struggling for self-esteem at the same time as she was walking in the clouds with never-ending supplicant attentions from all quarters. This girl also toys with social power stemming from her high value, calling betas to her support or using them as pons on the chessboard. Both the freeze out/dread game (first option) and (later) bitch-out produced positive results, but the freeze out maybe was a little too subtle and the bitch-out seemed to work better to set boundaries/answer the drama. Not being much of a bitcher in general, and with modernity forestalling the cave man discipline that seems to be wanted, how do you “bitch back like an alpha”, if it is not a contradiction in terms?

Analyzing how Robert fucking Pattinson is a weepy “beta” asstard? Gossiping about how Kristen Stewart is a vapid, horribly bored actress craving “alpha” cock? You guys are no better than the dumb Twilight obsessed bitches who buy US Weekly every time the media claims a celebrity is pregnant (when they’re really not, or are, who really gives a shit?).

HINT: This whole story was made up to sell magazines and promote the celebrities, probably by their publicist or production companies. These people’s entire lives are scripted and have nothing to do with reality. LOLZ.

This blog has an original reading template that is useful to discuss big ideas and also trivial matters. No one here really gives a fuck about the two actors. We’re reading and writing stuff for shits and giggles.

If you think you’re too good to hang around in here, then please go away. I’m sure you won’t be missed.

Nope, this is real life screwing up the second part of the Twatlight Finale. Stewart is dead meat, for breaking the dreams of two billion fat girls and Twitards (but I repeat myself). Pattinson is deeply damaged as well, women despise cuckolds. The only one it HELPS is the director, a nothing guy whose wife has already forgiven him predictably. Pattinson is Exhibit A on the innate desire of Western guys to go in for romantic BS, the I-Love-Yous, when Western women crave above all the inner, aloof, cocky A-hole.

Women everywhere *want* to be the woman who can string along one (or more) guy while banging a superior guy. Women everywhere hate the women who *can* do this. Women know this is the circumstance, so they try to be that gal on the down low, so as not to lose their “frenemies” (i.e., female allies of the moment).

Women everywhere know that to let men in on this game would ruin the whole construct the gals seek to create. That construct? GBFM laid is out above: alpha fucks and beta bucks.

Stewart was living the dream, guys. But she got busted. Now the women must ritually denounce her, in order to get the construct hidden.

Because god help the construct if all those dumb young men like Pattinson figure out what is really going on right now.

You have to learn to look at things in shades of grey [sic] rather than in black and white. In other words, learn to understand the concept of “probability”. If you’re a beta and you meet your homely wife in a church in a tight-knit, religious small town, and you both still live there, you most likely won’t be cuckolded. If you’re beta and dating a model in L.A., you can bet your bottom dollar that you will be, even if you’re the guy who plays Edward Cullen that every fat chick in the country adores.

So, I gotta ask the heartiste. Say things continue as they are (hypergamy, technological progress, feminization, corporate cunts, etc.), what are some of your more detailed predictions?

What would you do? Move away from major population centers and setup camp somewhere where you can defend yourself? Teach yourself some survival skills? Say we can make our products courtesy of nanotech, how would that impact the future?

The existing “manosphere” is basically negative, for good reason. The two main ideas it is built around are “women are sluts” and “the socio-economic-political system is operating as it was designed (meaning it is logically moving forward based on its assumptions and ends).” These concepts do not illicit happiness, hope, or goals. This justifiable lack of enthusiasm seems to have led many “manosphere” personalities to endlessly find new frames and examples to continuously drive home these two ideas with little content on what happens after they are accepted. This leads to the vast majority of readers having to choose between the “feminist-unicorn land” and the “woe to men” social contexts.

This is not to say the current “manosphere” is not justified. The acceptance of its ideas kills the “Captain-Save-A-Ho” and “Hero” dynamic men have been conditioned to accept their whole lives, so it comes as no surprise most never truly accept them. It is this dynamic that continuously pops up over and over in reader comment sections, proving that most readers are just in a different, more refined frame regarding the SMP and their role in it. Thus, the “manosphere” is perceived to be lacking any affirmative position.

To that end, is there any interest in creating a community where “post-manosphere” men can share their experiences, interests, and affirmative life-styles? The community would be pre-screened and exclusive, apolitical, and focus on constructive ideas for “post manosphere” men in this society. Hopefully, it would take on a lighter, more humorous tone regarding the fucked up place we inhabit, while supporting and helping guide its members.

Translation : For the kid to want Daddy’s approval it must respect Daddy, and being garbage, Daddy can make sure that he is respected only by remaining aloof, by distantness, by acting on the precept of “familiarity breeds contempt,” which is, of course, true, if one is contemptible. By being distant and aloof, [or absent], he is able to remain unknown, mysterious, and thereby, to inspire fear (“respect”).

An interesting idea. Personally, the bitterness of the majority of the commenters on blogs such as this is the reason I don’t engage in discussions, because it gets boring to hear all the spite over and over again, despite the excellent content. (and don’t even get me started on the wallowing in despair the MRA/MGTOW’s engage in).

A community focusing on the positive sides of the “red pill” (and not just getting some pussy zomg lolz) would be welcome, in my opinion. But what kind of a community would it be – a forum?

Hi loser. I’m sorry that you always have to hide your ugly face with that shit-eating grin :)

When you finally manage to lose your virginity, try to read my comment again so that the ugly fat chick that you bagged doesn’t cheat on you :)
You know, the way your mom cuckolded your dad and saddled him with an ugly bastard called whammer :)

Alphaness is sometimes more situational than hierarchical. Pattinson is super-alpha to almost all girls, in all situations. To his Hollywood actress girlfriend, he can be out-alphaed by this director. This director would be less alpha than, say, the biggest juicers in a meathead gym, or perhaps even the classic manager of Denny’s example.

The reason that these little boy omega losers get so upset is that they know what I’m saying is true. They like to believe that there’s this new thing called “game” and if they only learn the rules that even they can become lady killers :) The problem is that females have heard of this BS “game” a 1000x before you, as a little pencil necked geek in your cheap square toed shoes try it on her. She eliminated you just on sight before you opened your mouth to give her that little “game” spiel. :)

The reason omega losers like you can’t learn game is because you’re not only ugly, but stupid too :)

COULD THE ADMIN BAN THIS OMEGA DENIALIST TRASH? He’s not only a game denialist, he’s also a loud obnoxious cackling cunt. Which is fine, he can eat shit and die for all I care. But I’m not sure it’s a good idea to let the puahate aspie gremlin community troll the chateau comment section.

I have a serious question. I’m new to this. I’ve been lurking around these sites for a few months in search of answers, but, until yesterday, have never posted anything. I’ve been in 4 relationships that have failed in the past.

The first one failed because my high school girlfriend was too good for me. She came from a very wealthy family (I do not), her family never approved of me to begin with, and broke things off when she went to college out of state.

The second one failed because I was too clingy with my college girlfriend. We had a great relationship, but we were too comfortable around one another (no bathroom boundaries, ha…). Needless to say, she felt “claustrophobic” and broke things off after we had been together for two years.

My third relationship failed because I was drinking too much. I had another great girl my senior year in college, a good job, and a nice circle of friends, but then I started drinking on a daily basis. She stayed with me for about a year and tried to get me some help, but I couldn’t quit at that point. It took her leaving for me to actually get my act together and realize I was fucking my life up, but by the time I was myself again, she had gone and gotten engaged to another man.

My last relationship ended last year when my wife died. I thought I had learned from all my “beta” mistakes, and finally found out how not to scare away a good girl when I found one. I’m guessing I was wrong because now I can’t even get a date. I’m trying to get on with my life. I’ll always love and miss my wife, but I know she wouldn’t want me to stay single forever, and to be frank, I’m lonely.

I never had a problem attracting girls before, just by being myself. I’m still in good shape, have a good job, etc. I don’t know what the fuck I’m doing wrong.

I haven’t had any women be rude to me or anything, but they just don’t seem incredibly interested (no, I don’t start off conversations by talking about my wife), and the ones that are are not the types of women I could see myself being in a relationship with.

First, let me say that it is a very sad thing that your wife died, and I have sympathy.

Next I will smack you with the hard end of this: get over it.

Sounds harsh? Oh yes. As harsh as can be.

I understand. And this is why I say this.

My point is that as we see with so many “PUAs” working through their journeys and arriving to the view that “Inner Game” is the real Truth, so too you need to arrive at a state wherein you have forgiven yourself for her death, have wholly and deeply acknowledged her death, and have given yourself permission to move forward. Not nominally. Wholly.

From there, “be more attractive”: stay in shape/improve, eat well, indulge your interests, open your mind, focus on the present and the future, and rediscover your humor. Walk upon this stage that is life once again. Recognize that you are both the King and the Jester. Enjoy that. Enjoy both roles, but more than anything one must … advance. There is an old Buddhist saying that in order to advance to enlightenment you must first kill your Father, and then kill your teacher, and then kill the Buddha. What does this mean for you in your case?

Or, get up one morning, say “aw, fuck it” and just be an immature asshole with women… they’ll take that as being “manly” today and be attracted today. Do everything that you’re doing (stay in shape, improve your mind, etc.) too… they actually do value that once gotten them into be and made them cum a bunch.

But atropa’s issue is not women. Atropa’s issue is what is in his mind.

Empty your mind. Be formless. Shapeless. Like water. – Bruce Lee

Essential to achieving the calm-and-present state (and all of the benefits that result) is to have taken one’s current thought path to its logical end (death) and seen that this path is not useful, or at very least is no more useful than another path. We will all die, this we know. But it is how we live that matters.

Fvck “being manly”. That’s just other people’s bullsh¡t visited on your psyche. You know what is inside of you. Pull the fvcking sword from the stone, goddammit, and ironically you will be more “manly” than those people keeping score of what “manly” is can fathom.

Don’t “be manly”. Be TRUE. Manly is an adjective meant to describe TRUE. Do not be the derivative. Be the prime.

Once you are that, you will make women “cum a bunch”. If that is, at that point, what you decide is worth doing.

Thanks man, I appreciate your reply. I tried clearing my head, but the only thought that kept repeating is that I think any woman I start to date will think I’m comparing her to my wife, and won’t want to keep dating me. Maybe this is all in my head, and women won’t really think that, but if the tables were turned and it was me dating a widow, I would probably think like that. Obviously, My dating scorecard is low as it is, and I don’t want to strike out because of this.

Until you can achieve equanimity, you will emanate “do not touch” to all women.

But here’s the key point: this is the wrong issue.

What is far, far more important for you and your mind and your life is that you achieve that equanimity FOR YOU. She has died. It is a tragedy. She walked upon the stage for a time, and you walked with her, and moments of this were beautiful, and this is gone now. And that has had its end.

Sho ga nai.

Until you truly feel that, until you have incorporated and overcome that … no woman will touch you (for good reason).

But that’s ok, that’s understandable, and the issue is not these women with which you are dealing. This about saving yourself. That has to come first. First this, then everything else. NOTHING else, until this.

Get out of other people’s minds. They are not helpful to you. This means ignoring their expectations. Get into YOUR mind, and get it correct and joyful, and all else will flow. Like Bruce Lee’s water. Of this I know. Do not discount Lee’s views because he was a Hollywood superstar. He put in work, and he is useful to you in this case.

Throw away your “dating scorecard”. No one is keeping score who matters. Remember… kill your teacher. What does a teacher know? He knows what he’s learned, but does not know what you’ve learned, your potential, or your “way” (your “Do”, to use the Asian word). Good instruction is helpful, but ultimately you are alone on the mountain. You must climb the mountain on your own. What matters in achieving success is that you are TRUE and calm/present.

And because me saying it does not ever do justice to the almost blinding truth of Bruce Lee’s words (themselves borrowed from one of our greatest… Lao Tzu), please take the few life seconds to watch Lee state his case “in person”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRq7TJYLzK0 – this is part 1. Watch all three parts… he has much to teach you in how he thinks, moves and otherwise comports himself. Part 2 is where he discusses “be water”, but please take note of all he says, and how he says it (including his eyes, how he moves, etc.). His mind is right.

Who cares if they think you’ll be comparing them to your wife? That’s the kind of shit you should care about once you’ve been in a relationship for a while, not the kind of shit you care about before you even meet them. FFS

Hopefully the words that follow my “get over it” comment demonstrate that my thoughts on this are not trite, or at least not meant to be so. I stated what I stated in the way that I stated it as a shock to the system. Based upon the information I’ve received here, the problem is serious, and I have experience in this space. Based upon the poster’s desired outcome, the end result is known or at least can be seen in some fashion.

The fullness of the change required can only begin with the end in mind, and I am one that believes a little tough love works wonders, and also believes that years of therapy etc are a complete waste of time. Too much of our society coddles and builds imaginary nonsensical barriers.

If Atropa/another recipient believes in Freudian approaches (or their ilk), he is of course free to pursue those things. “Professional help” may help him. It may not. But let’s also take care to not perpetuate the fallacy that truth can only be ratified and certified by degree holders. That would bore me. Well, ok, I’ll admit it: that would annoy me. The truth is much simpler, and in some ways (bank account-wise) cheaper than that. And to boot, my experience with “counsellors” and their ilk is that they are jihadis for their beliefs, and/or box checking bureaucrats. In other words… the enemies of truth. Your mileage may vary.

@sh1nk3n- I have read If You Meet the Buddha on the Road, Kill Him! (and Fringe is awesome), so your words did not seem trite when I read them. It does help to think of myself as a warrior (because I have been at war with myself for a long time).

@Deer in Headlights- you’re absolutely right, had I heard “get over it” or “man up” last year, I probably would have punched that person in the face. I saw a Jungian psychotherapist (fuck Freud) for eight months after she died.

Anyone who has unexpectedly experienced the loss of the person they expected to live the rest of their life with SHOULD seek professional help. I would have gone bat-shit insane without professional help. It was annoying at first, and I didn’t think it was helping, but it’s the kind of thing that stays with you after the session is over, and you’re out living daily life.

@Tartarus- Good advice, and you’re absolutely right

So, I still have pictures of my wife and I sitting out in my apartment. I took down the wedding photo hanging on the wall, but I still have a small one of us on our honeymoon in the living room, and a picture of her by my bed. I really don’t want to take those down because they make me happy, but would they freak out a woman that I bring back to my place?

Why do you war with yourself? Challenge yourself, yes. But war? This is not of use.

Think of yourself as a warrior, yes. This is of use. Note my name and even my icon – Miyamoto-san. I also like to think of myself as a traveler as well (hence my comment about the mountain, earlier).

I am not one for the use of professional help, for reasons I cited above. But also as cited above, YMMV. If it works for you, use it.

I like Jung, but he too has issues, methinks. Certainly he’s far better than Freud. In any case, psychiatrists of any stripe, and “social workers”/ “marriage counsellors”, etc. are all to my view a colossal waste of space-time, and generally anti-male. I prefer Bandler and Grinder’s tactics, now called “NLP”, which are based upon the therapies of Milton Erickson and Bandler’s forays into computer programming and linguistics. I recommend reading Bandler’s books – they provide a construct that one can use.

Someone on this site said something a few weeks ago that I thought distilled everything I had ever learned about NLP into one sentence. That bastard.

“Strongest frame wins.”

You need to build your frame. And while you are at it, make it a good frame, with positive thoughts, internal harmony (no more of this war with yourself) aka “congruency” in NLP speak, forgiveness of yourself, optimism for the future, and interests in the world and worldly endeavors.

P.S. Regarding the photo of your dead wife by the bedside. You know that’s wrong but you are holding out. Is there not another place where you can honor your fallen?

P.P.S. Since you have me speaking of Miyamoto-san, please consider his Dokkodo, his gift to his student, upon Miyamoto-san’s death. It is a distillation of Lao Tzu’s teachings (the Tao Te Ching) into the sort of directions a warrior can follow (“Dokkodo” means “The Way to be Followed Alone”).

Accept everything just the way it is.
Do not seek pleasure for its own sake.
Do not, under any circumstances, depend on a partial feeling.
Think lightly of yourself and deeply of the world.
Be detached from desire your whole life long.
Do not regret what you have done.
Never be jealous.
Never let yourself be saddened by a separation.
Resentment and complaint are appropriate neither for oneself nor others.
Do not let yourself be guided by the feeling of lust or love.
In all things have no preferences.
Be indifferent to where you live.
Do not pursue the taste of good food.
Do not hold on to possessions you no longer need.
Do not act following customary beliefs.
Do not collect weapons or practice with weapons beyond what is useful.
Do not fear death.
Do not seek to possess either goods or fiefs for your old age.
Respect Buddha and the gods without counting on their help.
You may abandon your own body but you must preserve your honour.
Never stray from the way.

I don’t get this whole “manjaw” thing. Tricia Helfer who played number six in Battlestar Gallactica is about as beautiful and sexy as they come and yet has a strong chin. BTW, I noticed last night that Katie Sackhoff has a new gig in a series called “Longmire”.

models are chosen for their strongly defined features. the difference between a strongly defined jaw that is feminine and one that is masculine is the shape. triangular is feminine and square is masculine.

Am I the only one here who thinks this is a feel-good, good news story? I don’t follow showbiz much, but I know gays were saying that both of the Twilight stars were gay. Now we know that in fact K.S. is an enthusiastic heterosexualist, and R.P. at least likes chicks and has just had a major wakeup call about poontang — without suffering any divorce/alimony/custody problems. And as an older married guy, the potency of the experienced man/young hot chick combo is demonstrated again. What’s not to like?

“I feel boring. I feel like, Why is everything so easy for me? I can’t wait for something crazy to fucking happen to me. Just life. I want someone to fuck me over! Do you know what I mean?”

So, she wants to play some Russian Roulette? Why are women so masochistic? You have a tenuous alpha/beta analysis when it isn’t even 100% clear that Alpha’s are better for survival or fitness then beta (why are there so many betas if alpha is the better gene)? I won’t quibble over this because your pop science has a much more serious problem. The central problem with female fitness in modernity has nothing to do with alpha/beta but is delayed pregnancy. What are the psychological consequences of going 15-20-35 years after menstruation and failing to get preggers? Ancient women were ALWAYS pregnant, like in stone age societies. Women are designed to be constantly knocked up and hauling 5 kids. How can their psychology pull the 180 to barren femcunt lawyer slut? Or barren and bored slut actress? You don’t think this makes them masochistic freaks? They are built for pain (pregnancy and hauling kids). Your Alpha/Beta analysis works, but the bigger issue is masochism and other psych problems from being chronically barren.

The further dumbing down of American society. A New York Times article argues for the abolishing of algebra in school. Despite the fact it is a necessary stepping stone for calculus and ANY engineering related job.

The NYT author’s reasoning? Too many kids are failing. So let’s make schools easier to accommodate the feel good masses.

Work for anything? Naw, fuck it, that’s too hard! (The associated left/libtard lesson of “you didn’t build that”: get it from someone else… unfortunately, you’ll run out of other people’s money.) Victor Davis Hanson has an article on where this leads…

I must be a complete idiot about these things, because I wouldn’t have placed Kristen Stewart in the manjaw camp. I can tell with celebrities like Olivia Wilde, but less so with someone like Kristen Stewart who has a pretty thin face. I think Chateau needs a post for us those of blessed with manjaw-ignorance showing pictures of those with manjaws and those without. Mostly so I can satisfy my curiosity regarding which camp I fall into.

[…] King A /Matthew King comments on that thread, that’s EXACTLY what I was thinking of. Stewart is an interesting example because we’re watching her Flower Wither RIGHT NOW. She started when she was a Young Teen, Peaked at a Typical Peak Age of say 19 or 20 or 21, and then after that, like always, it’s all downhill, even if it’s a slow march downhill at first. We got to see her Pre-Peak, Peak, and now Post-Peak. Sure she’s still bangable, & I’m so beta that adding her to my Rotation – even at her current age – would IMPROVE its average, but she’s still POST-PEAK. She’s not gonna get any prettier. She was at her prettiest a couple years ago. Not Anymore. […]