Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-480:
-------------------------------------
+1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12414159/ZOOKEEPER-480.patch
against trunk revision 798038.
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.
+1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
+1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac
compiler warnings.
+1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.
+1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of
release audit warnings.
+1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests.
+1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Zookeeper-Patch-vesta.apache.org/159/testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Zookeeper-Patch-vesta.apache.org/159/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Zookeeper-Patch-vesta.apache.org/159/console
This message is automatically generated.
> FLE should perform leader check when node is not leading and add vote of
> follower
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-480
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-480
> Project: Zookeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.2.0
> Reporter: Flavio Paiva Junqueira
> Assignee: Flavio Paiva Junqueira
> Fix For: 3.2.1, 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-480.patch, ZOOKEEPER-480.patch
>
>
> As a server may join leader election while others have already elected a
> leader, it is necessary that a server handles some special cases of leader
> election when notifications are from servers that are either LEADING or
> FOLLOWING. In such special cases, we check if we have received a message from
> the leader to declare a leader elected. This check does not consider the case
> that the process performing the check might be a recently elected leader, and
> consequently the check fails.
> This patch also adds a new case, which corresponds to adding a vote to
> recvset when the notification is from a process LEADING or FOLLOWING. This
> fixes the case raised in ZOOKEEPER-475.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.