There
has been a malevolent movement that has been creeping across our nation
for some time now...it's insidious in its facade...and diabolical in its
goals. And it cloaks itself in purity...

The
emergence of the Religious Left appeared during the campaign of the last
presidential election. They appeared to be Christian in word, but if one
peaked under the sheep's clothing, one would find a sharp, merciless,
bite.

One
of the characters of this movement is the infamous (in my book) Tony
Campolo. His positions on hot button issues have been dubious for a few
decades now, but his recent 'tour' and message has riled this observer
to go verbally postal...

His
recent tour stop was at Bethlehem Bible College in the West Bank for the
school’s assembly of “Christ at the Checkpoint: Theology in the
Service of Peace and Justice.” This school promotes a form of
'Palestinian' liberation that is highly approved of by the
Religious Left. A contingent that isn't exactly opposed to violence
toward Israel.

The
other cohorts at this concert of creeps includes:

British
anti-Israel Anglican priest Stephen Sizer, and Naim Ateek of the Sabeel
Ecumenical Liberation Theology Centre.The
latter is a driving force behind the campaign
by mainline Protestant churches to divest from Israel.

Nice,
Tony...did you bring your trident too?

Is
Campolo free to speak his mind? Sure. BUT, as a representative of the
God of the Bible, he has to adhere to those doctrines...and they DON'T
include demonizing God's Chosen to accommodate the enemies of God.

The
propaganda spewed by Ateek and his ilk have their foundation, NOT in the
Judeo-Christian Bible, but rather in the Quran and Hadiths. And Campolo
ostensibly approves of this.

Shame
on Campolo for his abominable behavior toward the Apple of God's Eye.
But my rebuke will be met with arrogant disregard...because people like
Tony Campolo no longer HAVE a conscience to be pricked.

The
Australian (Aussie) people have been straight and unequivocal, in the
past, about Muslims imposing their radical ways upon their lifestyle.
But their government's position is the antithesis and quite baffling...

"There
are Islamic states around the world that practise Sharia law," he
said. "And if that is your object, you may well be much more at
home in such a country than trying to turn Australia into one of those
countries, because it is not going to happen."

In
another article, concerning former PM John Howard, the news source The Age, notes:

Mosques and Islamic schools will be targeted by intelligence agencies as the federal government tries to stamp out homegrown terrorism and extremists.

Prime Minister John Howard said on top of trying to promote Australian values in Islamic schools, the government would monitor what was said in certain schools and mosques to ensure they did not foster terrorism.

Asked whether he was prepared to "get inside" mosques and schools to ensure there was no support for terrorism, Mr. Howard was blunt.

"Yes, to the extent necessary," Mr. Howard told Southern Cross radio.

But
under the current Kevin
Rudd administration, Foreign Minister Stephen Smith has asked Israel to withdraw a diplomat after an
investigation found the country culpable for the slaying of a Hamas operative in Dubai. Smith
told Parliament that Israel's conduct was not the actions of a friend.

Really?
I would consider someone who eliminated a psychotic murderer, the truest
friend of all. The dirty work always seems to be left up to Israel, and
yet when the work is done, instead of thanks, they receive reprimand,
rebuke and punishment.

Is
Smith Mashugganer?
Hmm...I guess that's what happens when you spend too much time
wearing your Uggs...

Here's
the dichotomy of the Aussie government...Australia considers Hamas’
independent military wing, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, to be
terroristic, but accepts that Hamas does have legitimacy.

Legitimacy?
On what basis? So Hamas is a little bit terrorist? A little leaven
leavens the whole lump, right?

This
division of wings in Hamas is as bogus as the division of political and
religious Islam. Muhammed created both as inseparable. So it is with
Hamas. There is only ONE wing...and the heart of it bleeds hate.

The
Aussie citizenry knows this. Perhaps their government should pay
attention to facts a wee bit more and they just might become our intrepid
friends down under...*Hooroo!!

November's
coming...the Dems not only know it, they feel it. They feel it in the
anger they've provoked by their elitist, nanny-state mentality that has
put the American people in debt far beyond their years. But the Dems
have a plan...

They
don't want to, but they're gonna make nice...

Since
in office, Obama has gone out of his way to offend the Jewish
State...partly in an effort to woo the Muslim world, and partly by his
personal aversion to Jews (i.e. voluntarily attending an anti-Semitic
congregation for 20 years). But now, that it's looking extremely grim
for the Dems, and the tsunami is headed their way...they are now desperately
trying to salvage what they can to prevent too great a loss at the
polls.

And
now, as they did in the last election: They're using the Jews again.

In an effort to make amends,
Obama has unexpectedly reversed his frosty treatment of Israel and its
PM Binyamin 'Bibi' Netanyahu. O sent his top advisers, including his chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, with a
form of an apology to leading American Rabbis. Additionally, US Middle East envoy George Mitchell
has been directed not try and extract more concessions, from Israel.

Aww...O
is soooo sweet, isn't he?

Emanuel
was the most candid when he said that the Obama administration had
"screwed up the messaging" about his support for
Israel
since the beginning of his term. He pledged that the White House would
work to undo the damage, but said it would take "more than one
month to make up for 14 months."

Um...that
would be 485 days of dissing vs. 31 days of making nice...uh, not
enough, ya think? (Personal note: It could be 1,000 days of O making
nice and it wouldn't be enough...to make me hurl? Yes...to even the
score? No.)

In
other words...the election is getting closer and we need to schmaltz it
up with the Jews!

My
brethren on the left better wise up. Remember: Fool me once, shame on
you. Fool me twice, shame on me. O and his ilk are only being nice to
Israel to get your vote again, but they are lying to you...

Ah,
the innocence of youth (which has methodically been disintegrated by the
entertainment industry, but that's for a another discussion)...the days
of the original Little Rascals (aka Our Gang), where boys and girls found
that each other
had the dreaded cooties. And where the boys, in a determination to
regain and retain their power, established the 'He-man Woman Haters
Club'.

But
there was one group that established the original Club 1,297 years
ago...

There
are 177 verses in the Quran that have the word "women" in them,
including such texts as:

The Prophet said, "Isn't the witness of a woman equal to half of that of a man?' The women said, 'Yes.' He said, 'This is because of the deficiency of a woman's mind."

Oh,
I don't know...too much sweet talk for me, I'd say...

In
the case of The Little Rascals, they formed the He-Man Woman Haters
Club, because...being prepubescent boys, they see girls as the 'enemy'
(that is unless your name is Alfalfa and a girl named Darla winks at
you). But detestation was never in their tiny little hearts...

On
the other hand, in the case of Islam...hate for women IS indeed in their
hearts and minds...and a wink from a girl...will anger them to murder.

Little
boys eventually get over their opposition to girls and withdraw from the
Club. But as far as Muslim men go? They have been carrying their
membership cards since the 7th century...and don't plan on relinquishing
them any time soon.

We're
all familiar with the slogan WWJD (What Would Jesus Do). It was born out of
Charles Sheldon's 1896 novel In His Steps, where the lead character
suggested that if each person asked "What Would Jesus Do?" with
each decision they made, then the world would be a better place.

I
say, with the resurgence of Islam, Mohammedans deserve a slogan of their
own: WWMS.

What
does it stand for, you ask? Why it stands for the most important question in
Islam: Who Would Muhammed Slay.

Hmmm...quite
a menu, according to his writings.

Jews
(aka in Islam: Apes and pigs)

Christians
(aka in Islam: Pigs and dogs)

Assorted
infidels including: Hindus, Buddhists, etc.

Apostates
(those who leave Islam)

Adulterous
women (but not adulterous men)

Disobedient
women (disobedient to their husbands in ANY way)

ANYONE
who insults Islam (which is extremely ambiguous)

Homosexuals

A
woman/girl who brings shame on her family, also know as an 'honor
killing' (and the list of offenses that provoke the murder is
amorphous)

And
the list goes on...and I'm sure you all can name a few...

I
think this is a must, and it should come with a list of Quranic
reminders, so they will KNOW what their founder said verbatim...wouldn't
want to misinterpret the prophet, now, would they? They haven't yet...

So
the next time you meet a Mohammedan, help them remember their leaders
peaceful precepts by asking them: WWMS?

Ungrateful
wretches have a propensity to bite the hand that feeds them. And so is
the case with the media and entertainment in the US. There has a been a
subtle, yet efficacious demonization of our troops in process since the
Vietnam War. And now...it's not so subtle...

Is
this an intentional act? Yes and no. The detestation of the armed forces
is a deeply held belief of many on the Left...and this ever-abiding position cannot
help but surface...as it did with the hatred for the Jews before WWII.
Out of the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaks, the hand writes,
mindsets are revealed.

So
you ask, where is this anti-military evidence?

It's
done in a clever fashion...just under the radar.

In
TV/Movie scripts, we find: A mentally deranged killer found to have trained in the military.
It's revealed that a violent rapist served in Spec Ops, etc..

In news
stories: Troops indicted for killing civilians (failing to mention the
'civilians' were actually insurgents). Soldiers/Marines storm a home
(omitting the fact that the 'home' was a hideout for jihadists).

And
by anti-war liberal politicians, such as the late Rep. John Murtha
(D-Pa.) and then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) to mantle all American
troops as “murderers” and “terrorists” out to “kill innocent
civilians.”

And
so on...daily, boldly, with a subliminal affect. And the result is a populace
that is prone to believe the worst of our warrior heroes.

This
is an encoding that is vile to its very core. And the ONLY way to
address it is incident by incident. When you encounter a subtle slam on
our troops in TV, Film or the News...call the perpetrators out on the
carpet. Planting this image of our military in the minds of an audience
is no longer acceptable. And it needs to cease, post haste.

Our
defenders face far worse for us...we can at least do this for them.

OK...I'm
done. These politicos need a lesson ONLY learned with a physical encounter...with
the unemployment office.

'We
The People' entrust our precious votes to these individuals, NOT because
we need them to lead us by the nose. NOT because we required a second
mommy or daddy. BUT rather for these public servants to do our
bidding...represent US...NOT themselves.

Apparently,
this is beyond their comprehension.

But
fear not...there is a cure. It's called the 'pink slip'. Delivered by
the electorate on November 2nd. It's a boot to the *bum that is long
past due. And the citizenry is much more gracious than most
employers...we give them more than 2 months to make other plans for
their future.

Have
they been warned? You betcha! But no matter how vociferous the cry of
the people...their employers...was, they continued to do their own will
AGAINST the will of the people. And when the people took to the streets
(i.e. Tea Parties; Town Hall Meetings)...they were met with verbal
barbs, disparaging rhetoric and outright lies about them by their
representatives, aka employees.

So
what's a citizen to do? Kick their ever-loving Aunt Fanny out to the
curb...all with the simple pull of a lever.

Yes,
people...he's a SUPER GENIUS, that Barry. In his long and carefully
amassed knowledge on warfare, Barry has proved he's a 'whiz kid'...under
the dunce cap.

Obama
whipped Reagan out of his pocket when he wanted to make a lame analogy
to the Gipper, but he could learn a major lesson from Ronnie, if he
wanted.

On
March 23rd, 1983 Reagan laid out a strategy that he knew would keep our
nation safe:

“The
defense policy of the United States is based on a simple premise. The
United States does not start fights. We will never be the aggressor. We
maintain our strength in order to deter and defend against aggression
– to preserve freedom and peace. Since the dawn of the atomic age,
we’ve sought to reduce the risk of war by maintaining a strong
deterrent and by seeking genuine arms control. Deterrence means simply
this: making sure any adversary who thinks about attacking the United
States, or our allies, or our vital interests, concludes that the risks
to him outweigh any potential gains. Once he understands that, he
won’t attack. We maintain the peace through our strength; weakness
only invites aggression”‘

"Weakness
only invites aggression." Brilliant and time-tested! But in order
to properly comprehend this, one must not only possess intelligence, but
discernment...better known as wisdom. Which is sadly lacking in O's curriculum
vitae.

The
culmination of Obama's no-nukes dream is reflected in a new strategy,
known as the Nuclear Posture Review, which reduces U.S. reliance on
nuclear weapons for its national security by constricting
potential U.S. nuclear targets. That echoes Obama's pledge to move
toward a 'nuclear-free world'. With loonies like Kim Jong Il and
Ahmadinejad running around loose, a nuclear-free world is an unequivocal
impossibility. To reasonable and rational individuals, that
is...of which Obama has proved to be neither.

Ahmadinejad
has made it clear that he believes he is 'called' to prepare the way for
Islam's 12th Madi...and that dictates that he must create chaos in the
world...and there's no better way to foment that chaos then with a
mushroom cloud.

Peace
(Shalom) through strength is a proven strategy...but THIS is not the
path Obama has chosen for our nation...and that spells disaster. History
is littered with fools who have taken the Chamberlain road to
"peace for our time" through weakness and acquiescence...but
that course has led to the death and destruction of innocents. The only
conclusion at which a reasonable person can arrive is that Obama
believes that peace can be reached through stupidity.