AbstractThe invention relates to a permanent magnet perpetual motion machine in which one permanent magnet arrangement sets up a steady field in an annularair-cap which interacts with the field of another arrangement which comprises of a set of permanent magnets in a particular layout, or a particularly shapedcoil connected to a D.C. source, located in the annular air-cap, to cause perpetual rotation of either of the two arrangements, the other being stationary.

Full Specification

This invention relates to a permanent magnet perpetual motion machine.

The object of the invention is free mechanical energy production without fuel and in turn electricity generating to meet the world's power need.

The invention is a device which in principle is very much like any conventional magnet motors operating today, especially the small permanent magnet stator D.C. car fan motors.

The invention is also made up of two major parts, such as the stator and rotor. The great difference is that the invention has a circumferential field system in which the interacting magnets in the rotor disk are orbiting in the field instead of rotating like a conventional D.C. motor's armature.

The advantage of the invention as a magnet motor is that its rotating part also can be of a permanent magnet system without controlling the orbiting permanentmagnetism, and the device is still achieving the same object as any conventional D.C. motor whose armatures are operating through controllable electromagnetism, which, of course, requires a primary energy input.

Since the anisotropic ferrite parts of the invention in its field and rotor are producing their own magnetism, therefore the device is not in need of an outside energy source in order to produce torque or h.p.

The invention is a 100% permanent magnetism drive, either by repulsion or attraction magnetic physical laws.

This invention can be used as the prime mover to drive large generators, instead of steam engines, or by……..and can power any known transport machines instead of steam engines directly, or with electricity.

The principle of the invention is that, permanent magnetism need not be a controllable force in order to put it to work within the new design of this invention. In fact, it is good that we cannot control permanent magnetism economically. Ferrite magnets are quite new inventions in themselves and without them, this invention would not be possible. Only the new "ferri-magnetic" atomic age is able to produce free energy without fuel.

Fig. 1 is a cross section view of a three foot diameter prototype device of about 10 horsepower torque. (Fig. 1 should read with Fig. 8 drawing)

Component parts:-No. 1 is reference to the two field flux producing permanent magnet rings. Their magnetisation polarities can be seen with No. 11 on the left side of the drawing, which also shows the field flux flow direction between the circumferential pole faces and the flux return path through its magnetic yoke.No. 2 is the non-magnetic material clamps, holding the orbiting magnet systems together which are imbedded in the disk with the magnet system.No. 3 is the full circle magnetic yoke, or flux return path, just like any conventional permanent magnet field D.C. rotor motors must be fitted with, in order to obtain the best results.

The primary object of the invention is to achieve a uniform and an infinite (in distance) magnetic field system, within a limited area which has no beginning nor end to it. From Fig. 1 we can imagine a whole device having two large permanent magnet rings which are housed in the centre of No. 3 circumferential magnetic yoke following the radius of the ring magnets. Now it is apparent that between the space of the two magnet rings, there is an existence of a uniform and very powerful magnetic field which in reality is like a never ending circumferential magnetic tunnel; equal in infinite distance.Such field is very unorthodox, when we think of the small portion of field, within a conventional two pole D.C. motor which inevitably demands a controllable electromagnetism for its rotor, or armature and also the inconveniences of current commutating systems and the through brushes electricity supply to its coils.

The invention's design system with its infinite distance of unbroken field totally eliminates the need of controllable magnetism in order to produce a constant force, and it is regardless if the turbine's rotor is using permanent or electromagnetism in order to produce mechanical force, since the unorthodox field system also can operate (interact) with electromagnetism.

No. 4 is non-magnetic strong plastic fillings which also helps to hold the field producing magnet rings securely housed in their magnetic yoke.

Nos. 5 and 6 are a light aluminium cast either of one piece, cast to form flange and strong disk centre or of separate pieces, secured together.

No. 7 is a light non-magnetic material to provide a strong outside disk to house the ball-bearings and the magnetic turbine's material systems.

Of course, there are various ways to make a good fixings between the outer shell and the magnetic yokes which cannot be shown in small drawings. The object of the drawings is to describe the main principles of the invention and not the most apparent minor technological details of constructional means and ways.

No. 8 is a strong hollow axle which is rotating with the disk, that is, if the machine is producing torque only by permanent magnetism. If the turbine's disk is fitted out with D.C. electromagnetic coils (see later) then the field system must rotate on its fixed axle in order to eliminate the current supply and return through a brush and rotating ring system. Therefore the axle is hollow which provides access for current supply into the stationary interior of the device.

No. 9 is a description of the ball-bearings which are free to move on the thinner ends of the axle so that the device can easily be separated by hydraulic mechanical means, since that is the only way to stop the device working. It is apparent that we cannot switch off permanent magnetism, therefore the magnetic yoke system and the field producing ring magnets must be separable.

In fact a prototype device must be under a constant load, during operational positions such as driving a transport or a generator in order to prevent self-destruction by the centrifugal forces originating from unknown speed rotation. It is apparent that within a 100% permanent magnet motor drive, there is no counter electromotive force in effect, which in fact controls the speed of conventional electromagnet motors. Therefore the device must carry load, or be pulled apart when energy is not needed.

No. 10 is a non-magnetic metal type forming the outer most circumference of the disk which in fact prevents the orbiting magnet system from flying apart.

No. 11 shows the magnetism circulation in the power producing area of the device.

No. 12 is the common air gap when one part of mass must be free to rotate in another.

No. 13 is the physical contact line between two parts of iron which is forming the major part of the magnetic yoke, while the part 3 - 'A' is housed in the disk and friction free through air gaps regardless which major part of the device is rotating.

No. 14 is the A.C. supply, that is, if the turbine's disk is working by electromagnetism, or with the combination of both.

Fig. 8 is a full surface view of the disk when one ring magnet with its yoke part is removed from its twin part, and showing the orbiting magnet systems and how they are disposed in the mass of the disk. See 1.A. = space to adopt any system.

Fig. 2 is a cross-section view of two different orbiting magnet system designs, when perpendicularly placed in the field. The machine is working (in this case) through repulsion principle which takes effect between the like-poles facing each other from 45 degree angles within the whole system. There are also small attraction forces in favour of motion, when small magnets are placed in front of the primary magnet systems, so that unlike-poles are facing the field ring pole faces. (The complete attraction principle driving system will be described later in this specification.)

Fig. 4 is also a third magnet design means, since the inventor has to consider the easiest and the best mass-production possibilities of the anisotropic ferrite magnets, which will supply the orbiting magnet systems.

The object of the vertical magnets placed on the motion sides of the primary magnets in parallel in the field, is to concentrate the field flux away from the radius sides of the primary magnets which in turn eliminates the small opposing forces to motion. (Again, this will be further described later when specifying a 100% attraction drive principle.)

Fig. 5 is a cross section of an electromagnetic coil of new design which is an invention in its own right, but the coil would be useless without the turbine device principle, for which it was designed.

Figs. 4 and 5 are placed alternately in the turbine's circumferential field in order to describe the similarity between their magnetic interaction with the field lines of force. In fact, both principles are producing a catapult action principle upon the field line of force, whether it is a circular line of force around an energised conductor or when like-poles are forced to loop out the field line of force from a certain angle which of course is very similar in principle to that which the circular lines of force are achieving with their one half side of radius surface when energised.

The turbine's disk can be fitted out with alternate systems as in Figs. 4 and 5. The objects of multi principle is to act as a booster.

For example, if a bus or any ground transport is powered by a permanent magnet turbine which is powerful enough to push them at the speed of 100 km per hour on level ground and to keep up such inertia, then this is all good. An effective road transport must be able to cope with fast acceleration from a stationery state, particularly when overtaking and climbing hills. These are the short periods during a long distance journey when the coils are energised from a certain number of batteries with the right volt pressure, at the times when extra power is needed.

During level travel, the batteries are charging from a conventional small alternator when the coil circuits are open. The small alternator is powered from the big turbine. In fact, a fue coil would be enough in the disk as a standby power source to make up the extra mechanical energy requirements needed during the above circumstances of a road transport. During these short times of extra power need the coils can draw large currents since their operation is not meant for constant use, unless the turbine's disk is a fully electromagnetic system with the new design coils.

Fig. 6 is a long view of the new design coil which would be cut in half lengthwise. 'A' is a non-magnetic core which is only a short plastic tube with an open side for speedy and easy winding. 'B' and 'B' are the conductors which also show the current flow direction.

Fig. 5 is a cross section of Fig. 6 showing its circular lines of force, electromagnetic circulation and the interacting effects of its outside circular lines of force when they are disposed so as to be perpendicular to the plane of the turbine's circumferential never ending field.

One object of this new coil design is to provide a very large surface area of circular lines of force because the greater the interacting surface in the field, the higher the mechanical energy production will be. If the field system is permitted to rotate, then the coils will act as the stators and they can be directly supplied with current without rotating rings and brushes. Also, the current commutation is totally eliminated since the turbine's field is infinite in distance.

Fig. 6 is a very unconventional coil design and the drawing is approximately the correct life size. The drawing only shows three layers of amper-turns covering the outside surface of its hollow tubelike core, simply to demonstrate the winding principle of such coils. It is apparent that each wire turns return loop, bends into the hollow space on one end of the core and continues to the outside surface on the other end of the core. The great virtue of this new coil design is that it can act as one single straight conductor with current in and outlet on one of its ends only, and the coil can have any number of amper-turns until the desired resistance is reached, and still act as a short straight conductor, with multiplied dense circular lines of force when energised. Of course, this new coil invention would be pushed out from the field of a two pole D.C. motor with the correct magnet motor drive principle because such a field has no distance. But if the new coil system is perpendicularly placed in the turbine's never ending circumferential permanent magnet field, the interaction force producing motor principle would be constant without D.C. commutation. The virtues of such principles are very apparent within electrical technology.

Such motors can take advantage of the well known leverage action principle, since the driving force circumference can be any distance away from the machine's axle. The power gain is fantastic.

Fig. 7 is a cross-section view of another coil system which in principle is the same as Figs. 5 and 6.

Fig. 7 coil consists of several individual coils, each having two ends to take D.C. supply individually, so that they form a full circuit with the final objective to have one 7" long single conductor which is very rich with its outside surface circular lines of electromagnetic force.

Since the turbine's circumferential field can be of any diameter which requires "NO" energy to sustain and can be of any desired flux density as a free mechanical interacting force, such coils as in Fig. 7 can be very practical with many other virtues besides having a commutation and brushless D.C. disk armature in the turbine's limitless permanent magnet field.

With the turbine system's unlimited diameter circumferential permanent magnet field, if combined with the new design coils (part of this invention) in its rotating disk, such system has already achieved some free electricity production because of the physical law of leverage action principle, but such coils are only a standby extra energy producing means which can be called upon at any time.

The most important part of this invention is the attraction drive principle in which the symmetry in magnetic physical law is totally outsmarted by the fertile human mind. It is the symmetry of physical laws which precludes physicists from attempting to build a perpetual motion machine. Einstein also had to examine models and specifications of perpetual-motion devices and he well knew that in principle they could not possibly work, for his third, fourth and fifth papers dealt with thermodynamics (in 1904 we had no ferrite magnets) - a powerful science built on two laws that essentially assert the impossibility of making perpetual-motion machines.

It is all very well that we cannot change the symmetry of physical laws, but the human mind is so creative that such laws can be out-cheated without interfering with nature's physical laws.

In fact, the principle of this invention is that because we cannot alter the symmetry of physical laws, therefore a powerful perpetual-motion device is just as much a reality as the perpetual motion of permanent magnetism.

First of all, permanent magnetism within the concept of perpetual-motion devices is not subject to Einstein's thermodynamics, nor to gravity.

It is senseless to think about having a mass to have a perpetual-motion and take energy from it, especially when we have an existing subatomic energy perpetual-motion in the form of magnetism produced by ferrimagnetic ferrites as a permanent source to produce free mechanical dynamics.

The invention's design is such that it can enslave permanent magnetism to do hard work because of the very fact that we cannot eliminate the symmetry of physical laws which also applies to permanent magnetism. This may sound very odd, but Fig. 3 will speak more than just words.

We must imagine Fig. 3 'A' and 'B', as the turbine's circumferential field system, has been straightened out. This is strictly for easier drawings and for a better view into the field because a radius drawing could mislead the message, or just imagine the drawings going around the earth like a big ring, and we only see a small part of it.

Fig. 3 'A' demonstrates a partly finished turbine disk between the field pole faces with exaggerated air gaps for easier understanding.

We call the vertical slim magnets as the field dividing magnets to produce several equal field portions all around in the circumferential system. The dividing magnets flux is parallel with the field lines of force, also in flux-flow direction.

This drawing 'A' demonstrates the symmetry in magnetic physical law which is the principle evidence why a permanent magnet perpetual motion device is not possible. Of course, in this case there can be no mechanical motion or force because all of the flux is symmetrically distributed throughout space and the devices magnetic materials. Of course there are attraction forces between the unlike poles; upwards - downwards - right and left, but they are equal to all four directions cancelling each other out, and for the same symmetry reason the disk cannot put up the slightest opposing force (magnetically) when rotated by hand. So the field separating magnets are free to move with the disk within the field either left or to the right, and when rotated the field portions between them are simultaneously reestablished from the motion direction. So to speak - what amount of field flux is left behind from between the separators it is regained from the one in front of it. This is a never ending process, because of the circumferential field of the device.

(It is apparent from the Fig. 8 disk drawing that all the orbiting magnet systems are in reality 7" long and perpendicularly placed in the 6" wide field tunnel and what we see in Fig. 3 'A' and 'B' is a life size cross-section view.)

Fig. 3 'B' has two sets of magnets which demonstrate the fully outfitted disk with such magnet systems.

The invention's free mechanical energy is obtained from the devices constant magnetic attraction forces which is transmitted to its axle through the mass of the disk. This is achieved by out-smarting (cheating) the symmetry in magnetic physical laws with another set of magnets which are placed in the disk right next to the primary field dividing magnets and not without good reason - they are much shorter with much larger pole face areas.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

The following statement between these two lines is very important in order to understand the invention's attraction drive principle: electrical and magnetic science knows that we cannot control permanent magnetism within conventional magnet motor designs in order to produce torque. It is also known that magnetism has no known insulating materials through which we could achieve some way to control, or to guide the lines of force, which in turn could offset the symmetry in magnetic physical law.The above facts are not as true as they may seem to be because if we cannot insulate or control magnetism with materials it does not mean that we cannot achieve the same object with another magnetism. One magnetism can insulate another as well as controlling it, in a sense, to direct the force of lines to a desired direction.

For example, all straight bar magnets magnetosphere in space resemble a doughnut shape that is thickest around its sides where the field is the weakest and thin in the poles where it is the strongest. Now if we press two bar magnets together (especially anisotropic ferrite ones) sideways so that the like-poles are next to each other having no air space between them, then both magnets total flux productions are forced to circulate in space on the three sides area of the two four-sided bar magnets. This small experiment not only proves that we can control magnetism but in fact we can also insulate it by another magnetism, so that the flux will flow to the desired direction, such as is the case in this invention.

Now if we look at Fig. 3 'B', such system is achieving the above facts because the shorter magnets flux production cannot divide to two equal parts at its North pole in order to re-enter into its South pole, because there is another magnet which prevents the natural law to take effect (that is, if the two magnets are not placed in the field of the turbine). Since such magnet systems in the turbine's disk are 7" long by 1" x 1" therefore 90% of their flux production can be controlled to flow on one long side of it, only because of the presence of another magnet in mass contact on the other side of it. In fact the field dividing taller magnets mass and magnetism acts as insulators on one side of the shorter magnets, so that when such system is perpendicularly placed in the field, the shorter magnet's pole faces are in fact insulated out on one of its sides, in order that the field producing magnet rings pole faces cannot attract up on the short magnets from both sides of them, which in turn forces all the attraction effects to take phenomenon from one side only in favour of motion and without the slightest opposing attraction to motion.

Of course if we were to remove the tall field separator magnets, then there would be no one-sided insulation, or control up on the power producing short magnets and the symmetry in magnetic physical law would be free to take effect and because of such powerful laws, the machine could not produce the expected free mechanical energy production.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Now we have to imagine the field lines of force between the long separators as if each portion was the field between the poles of a U shaped magnet, or produced by two blocks of magnets just like inside the yoke of a two pole D.C. motor. Now if we place a third magnet near to those field unlike pole wise then the magnet in hand will be pulled out into the very centre of the parallel field with great force, almost shooting out on the far side of the field and pulled back again.

In principle this is how the device is producing its mechanical energy output, but of course the above example force is happening with a very limited short distance field and the magnetic attraction dynamics stops in the centre of the field, so that a magnetic closed circuit is fast established within a shortest possible distance and the sideway force stops, because the field is not infinite in distance like within the turbine system, therefore the force cannot be constant but momentary, while the invention can sustain a constant attraction pulling process within its circumferential never ending field.

If the secondary short magnets could move in the disk's body into position C. Fig. ‘B’, then another new symmetry would be established magnetically and mass wise throughout the device and there would be no power source again to pull the disk around.

The physical law in magnetism in space is that the lines of force are always seeking the shortest possible distance to make up, or to form a magnetic closed circuit. Within the invention, this law is in great effect because the secondary short magnets are not free to move in the mass of the disk, so that the disk, which is free to move, must be pulled by the fixed magnets as they are constantly attracted by magnetic gravitics into the centre of the field, because the symmetry in physical laws is always in effect and constantly attempting to establish equilibrium, so that mankind cannot have a free energy source. BUT NOT IN THIS CASE!

It is a good example to know that magnetic lines of force are always in a state of contraction tension. So are stretched elastic threads. Suppose that we imagine elastic threads between the unlike pole faces in Fig. 3 to be pulled into a loop as in a catapult, then the object causing the pulling force, viz. the stone, will be acted on by a mechanical dynamics which will try to eject the stone from the loop in order that the elastic may become straight again. Similarly, the pulled out lines of field force with the flux produced by the sideways disposed magnets want to produce a shortest possible magnetic closed circuit which can happen only if the short magnets would be free to be pulled into the very centre of the field, and consequently the whole disk has to move with all its fixtures and fittings, so they produce a powerful mechanical force, or torque on the axle.

Of course within the turbine, this force is constant because a circumferential field is never able to come to an end, and as the disk is rotating with its orbiting magnet systems the same situation is constantly re-established which is similar to a dog never being able to catch his tail when chasing it around. So the short magnets never will be able to end up in the centre of the divided fields, because the field left behind is simultaneously available from the attraction direction and the force must remain the same as well as constant. It makes no difference what position the unlike-poles attract each other within their inherent physical law to form a shortest possible magnetic circuit. The turbine has a very powerful magnetic closed circuit which is pulled out, or stretched out, sideways by the right-hand side positioned magnets still in the same field circuit which want to become straight because that would be the machine's shortest possible magnetic closed circuit to establish, so that the field space null points would be equal, or symmetrical on both sides of the centre magnets. Since that cannot happen, the shortest flux route is still through the far displaced magnet's mass, but of course the circuit is stretched out by attraction forces which in turn produces mechanical dynamics.

From 'D' North field flux is attracted by the nearest South pole from the centre magnet, so as its North pole is pulled by the South face of the field magnet rings ('D' area) so that the flux could return into the magnetic yoke to reappear from North to do the same work in an eternal cycle.

If permanent magnetism is not a perpetual-motion dynamics, then what is?!! In fact, a piece of good permanent magnet is the reality of a perpetual-motion device in spite of the fact that we cannot see its dynamics in its perpetual-motion, but most certainly it can be made to power its own mass within the concept and principle of magnetic perpetual-motion devices such as this invention. Demagnetisation effects do not even enter into attraction drive principles, so a prototype device can function indefinitely and provide free energy. Only a high temperature can put an end to the process.

The centre magnets each have a total of 12 square inch magnetic pole surfaces on which the magnetic attraction gravity pull is about 20 lb. As an interaction force from the field pole faces (see ‘D’ and 'D' Fig. 3 'B') a 36" diameter device can house 20 orbiting magnet systems. So a small unit such as this would have a total of 400 lb. magnetic attraction gravity drive. With a 5 feet diameter prototype, a 4 seater car could be easily powered by a 1,000 lb. "magnetic gravitics" and its speed and power to be controlled by hydraulic system means to separate, or increase the air gap of the machine.

The invention's magnetism is produced by anisotropic ferrimagnetic materials such as barium or strontium ferrite.

Various changes and modifications may be made in the system described without departing from the physical principle of this invention. Of course, the above has been given by way of illustrative example, and it will be realised that all such information as would be apparent to persons skilled in the art of permanent magnet physics, are deemed to fall within the broad scope and ambit of the present invention as is herein set forth.

CLAIM 1A magnet motor powered by permanent magnetism as the interaction result between two magnetic lines of force from two different sources. One would be known as field, or stator, and the other as a rotor disk. In fact the invention’s claim cannot be defined other than the reality of a very powerful permanent magnet perpetual motion device.