"In A Time Of Universal Deceit, Telling The Truth Becomes A Revolutionary Act" - George Orwell, Author
.....
"All Truth Passes Through Three stages. First: It Is Ridiculed, Second: It Is Violently Opposed, And Third: It Is
Accepted As Self-Evident" – Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher

Thursday, December 11, 2014

Very Important Health News: Why Flu Shots Are The Greatest Medical FRAUD In History

It is that time of year again where our governments are pushing people to go out and get their seasonal "flu shots".... I was just at the local store/pharmacy the other day, and again I saw a small queue of people lined up like brain dead sheep ready to obediently, like lemmings, roll up their sleeves and allow poisonous and deadly "vaccines" to enter their bodies.... From previous experience that I have noted very well in reports at this blog, I have steered away from these line ups and avoided even trying to knock some sense in these gullible people that vaccines simply do NOT work.....

I want to present right here a very important report that comes from the Natural News website at www.naturalnews.com....It is entitled: "Why Flu Shots Are The Greatest Medical Fraud In History" and it is extremely important reading for everyone, especially those who still are considering going out and getting these deadly flu "vaccines" injected into their bodies... I have that full report right here and of course my own thoughts and comments to follow:

Why flu shots are the greatest medical fraud in history

(NaturalNews) As one of the very few independent voices willing to stand
up against the scientific dogma of our modern medical regime, I've long
felt a need to communicate the dangers of flu shots to the public so
that people can have better information to prevent vaccine injuries and
save lives.

This doesn't mean I'm opposed to the theory of vaccination, by the way. In fact, I'm the author of A Blueprint for Safer Vaccines, an audio guide to saving lives and preventing vaccine injuries and deaths.

My independent atomic elemental analysis of flu vaccines,
published in the summer of 2014, proved that flu vaccines contain over
50 ppm mercury, an extremely toxic heavy metal linked to kidney failure,
birth defects, spontaneous abortions and neurological damage. This
finding has never been refuted by anyone. In fact, it was affirmed by vaccine
proponents who insisted that it is perfectly safe to inject pregnant
women, young children and senior citizens with mercury even though the
flu vaccine insert itself readily admits there is no scientific evidence
whatsoever to support the safety and efficacy of the vaccine in such
groups.

Believe it or not, there are still millions of people,
doctors, pharmacists and even journalists who do not yet realize there
is a very high concentration of mercury
in influenza vaccines given to pregnant women, children and senior
citizens. Most people, you see, have been lied to by the media which has
stated over and over again that mercury was removed from all vaccines.

That's simply not true.

It's
still there. And toxic mercury is present in influenza vaccines at a
level that's literally 25,000 times higher than the EPA limit of mercury
in drinking water. [7] It's 100 times higher than the highest level of
mercury contamination I've ever tested in ocean fish.

See the evidence for yourself

To prove the presence of mercury in influenza vaccines, I'm going to show you four irrefutable pieces of evidence:

1)
Photographs of a 2013 / 2014 influenza vaccine box admitting, in very
small print, to the addition of mercury to the vaccine as a
preservative.

2) Photographs of the influenza vaccine insert once again repeating the admission that the vaccine contains mercury.

3)
A screen shot from the Centers for Disease Control website which admits
that vaccines still contain the following ingredients: Aluminum,
Antibiotics, Egg Protein, Formaldehyde, Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) and
Thimerosal, a mercury-containing chemical compound.

4) Lab
results from the Natural News Forensic Food Lab which confirmed almost
precisely the same level of mercury claimed by the manufacturer
(GlaxoSmithKline).

Before I show you the irrefutable evidence, there is some good news in all this testing. As part of this Natural News
investigation, I tested several different vaccines, including an HPV
vaccine. Mercury levels were extremely low in these other vaccines. Only the flu shot contained extremely high mercury levels.

Influenza vaccine box admits safety never established for pregnant women

As
you can see below, the box for this Flulaval Influenza Virus Vaccine
readily admits the use of thimerosal which contains mercury. (Of course,
you have to use a magnifying glass to see this.) In microscopic text on
the package insert, it says straight out, "Register women who receive
Flulaval while pregnant in the pregnancy registry by calling
1-888-452-9622."

Yet, at the same time, the insert also admits that "safety and efficacy have not been established in pregnant women."

In other words, this vaccine containing mercury is being promoted for use in pregnant women even when no safety in pregnant women has ever been established.

It's also important to note that when people are being given flu shots, they are never handed the package or the insert, so they have no opportunity to read any of this information unless they specifically ask for it.

It's
not like a food item with a "Nutrition Facts" label. Vaccines are sold
in "stealth" mode where patients have no idea what's in them and no
opportunity to read possible warnings.

As further proof of this point, consider the fact that this flu vaccine comes with only one insert,
yet it's a 10-dose vial intended to be injected into 10 different
people. Clearly, if there's only one insert but 10 people, then 9 out of
10 people can't possibly be handed the insert.

In fact, from a legal perspective, vaccines are routinely injected into people without informed consent.
Virtually no one administering vaccines ever explains the risks vs.
benefits of vaccines as is required under medical ethics and state
medical law. In nearly all cases, patients are simply hoodwinked and
told there are no risks at all.

The second piece of evidence to
reveal here is the package insert for the influenza vaccine, a document
printed in microscopic text that's almost impossible to read without a
magnifying glass.

Of course, the intention is that no one ever
read this document, because it contains shocking admissions of the total
quackery and marketing deception behind flu shots.

As
you can see from this snapshot, the package insert readily admits that
each vaccine dose "contains 50 mcg thimerosal (<25 br="" mcg="" mercury="">In
case you're wondering, "mcg" means micrograms. A microgram is 1/1000th
of a milligram. Mercury is toxic at any dose when injected into the
body, even in micrograms. There is no such thing as a "safe" form of mercury
when injected. In fact, the ethyl form of mercury used in vaccines is
many times more toxic than methyl form once it enters human cells. Click here for a fascinating interview with mercury toxicity expert Dr. Chris Shade who explains this extremely important concept.

The same paragraph shown above also admits the vaccine contains formaldehyde, a potent neurotoxic chemical.25>

Vaccine insert admits safety and effectiveness have never been established

What's
even more astonishing about this insert is that it openly admits the
flu shot is a complete medical hoax, backed by nothing but voodoo woo
woo faith-based dogma (and clever marketing).

Here are actual words from the insert (which is much more lengthy than the snapshot shown above):

"There have been no controlled trials adequately demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with Flulaval."

"Safety and effectiveness of Flulaval have not been established in pregnant women, nursing mothers or children."

"Safety and effectiveness of Flulaval in pediatric patients have not been established."

"Flulaval has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility."

"Do not administer Flulaval to anyone... following previous administration of any influenza vaccine."

CDC admits use of mercury, MSG, formaldehyde

For
those "mercury denialists" who still can't believe flu shots given to
pregnant women contain high concentrations of toxic mercury, even the
CDC reluctantly admits this fact on its own website.

Laboratory results from the Natural News Forensic Food Lab

The final piece of irrefutable evidence on all this comes from my own scientific laboratory,
where I run ICP-MS instrumentation to test foods, beverages, dietary
supplements and other items for heavy metals contamination.

When I finally got around to testing vaccines, I was shocked to find over 51,000 ppb mercury in the Influenza Virus Vaccine.

Why
was I shocked? Because I don't recall ever seeing anything run through
my ICP-MS instrument with that high a concentration of mercury. The mercury in this flu vaccine was the HIGHEST concentration of mercury I've ever seen in anything, period!

And
this is a product that's injected directly into the bodies of pregnant
women, where mercury goes right into the developing fetus.

What's even more interesting is that this finding once again confirms the accuracy of my lab instrumentation because it's almost in perfect agreement with the level of mercury detailed on the vaccine package insert.

Let's do the math:

* Each dose of an influenza vaccine is 0.5 mL in volume* My lab found just over 50 ppm of mercury in the vaccine liquid.* 50 ppm (concentration) x 0.5 mL (volume) equals 25 mcg of mercury.

Guess
what the package insert says? (Up to) 25 mcg of mercury per dose.
Near-perfect agreement, in other words. My finding of 51 ppm rather than
50 ppm either means my own tests were off by about 2% (which is still
considered very accurate for ICP-MS testing) or that GSK put 2% extra
mercury into the vaccine.

And just so you know I actually did the tests, here's what else we found with other analytes:

Aluminum: 0.4 ppmArsenic: zeroCadmium: zeroLead: zero

So, I can confidently say that the flu vaccine won't poison you with lead, cadmium or arsenic
because it contains none of those things. Even the aluminum level is
quite low and not a concern at this very low level. The real problem is
just the mercury, at least as far as elements go.

Why won't vaccine makers remove the mercury?

Good
question. Everybody knows mercury is toxic to inject into the human
body. That's not debated except by irrational anti-science denialists
who refuse to acknowledge the Table of Elements.

You have to
wonder: why choose mercury as a preservative? And why do both the CDC
and FDA continue to look the other way as an entire branch of modern
medicine poisons our women and children with a neurotoxic heavy metal?

And
if vaccine promoters, propagandists and patent holders want the world
to accept all their vaccines, why don't they just remove the mercury and
be done with it? If they take out all the toxic elements, resistance to
vaccines would all but evaporate.

Why vaccines are the "anti-science" medical voodoo of the modern world

Ever
wonder why they don't conduct legitimate clinical trials on flu vaccine
efficacy? Probably because they know the results would have to be faked
to show any efficacy at all. That's what Merck did with its mumps vaccines, according to two former virologists who worked there.
They spiked human blood samples with animal antibodies to fabricate
positive results. Yep, vaccines work so poorly that even the
manufacturers have to fake their own results to show any efficacy.

How's
that for medicine we can all trust? Think about it: this is a product
that contains multiple neurotoxins in very high concentrations; a
product backed by no safety trials or efficacy data; a product linked to
numerous serious adverse reactions; and yet a product that enjoys
absolute legal immunity thanks to the U.S. government.

If that's not outright medical quackery, I don't know what is.

For
the record, I'm not an opponent of all vaccines. But I do believe -- as
do a rapidly increasing number of other clear-thinking people -- that medicine should not poison our women and children. It's time for mercury to be removed from all vaccines, once and for all. Anything less is medical negligence.

New video interview about flu shot failures

Ultimately, We the People will be victorious in the removal of mercury from all vaccines
-- an idea that's already well accepted across much of Europe. And when
that day comes, it will be yet another victory for the Natural News fan
base, an amazing community of millions of remarkable people working
together for the protection of our children, our health and our world.

NTS Notes: I want to thank Mike Adams for again presenting a most excellent article that shows the dangers of vaccines and how they are indeed a fraud perpetrated on our society...

I do wonder as well WHY the pharmaceutical giants that have been making these "vaccines" for decades have not removed poisonous Mercury from their products? I do wonder again if there is indeed a more sinister aspect and the fact that criminals do know that heavy metals such as Mercury have long been known to damage the human body's immune system and can cause mental and biological changes in people? It seems again that the addition of Mercury to vaccines is indeed done on purpose.....(Read the sinister Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion and the part where they would use "heavy metals" as a method of controlling the "Goyim")

Well, there you have it... More evidence presented that shows clearly that vaccines simply do NOT work and that the chemicals they contain do more harm to people than the diseases they are supposed to fight!

As I stated before, it is indeed Flu Season, and people do have the choice.. They can either consider safe alternative remedies for fighting the flu that do no harm at all to their bodies, or they can go out and like mutton headed sheep line up and allow Big Pharma to inject their poisons into their bodies... The choice is again still up to people, and I do hope that more and more do make the logical sensible choice...

3 comments:

I got a flu shot 4 years ago. 3 or 4 days after the shot I came down with Bell's Palsy. I still got it.

Thank you for the article -- the warning -- about flu shots. There are side effects to the flu shots, that's for sure. I learned it the hard way.

Bell's Palsy is a possible side effect to the flu shot.

A nurse I know who works in the local hospital told me the nurses are not allowed to tell the patients that flu shots have possible side effects. They can get fired if they tell the truth. She tells her patients anyway.

I live half a block from a hospital. A few days after getting Bell's Palsy, my nurse friend saw me in my front yard, she had just finished her shift and was walking to her car parked on my street. She said, "You got Bell's Palsy". I said "Yes". She asked me if I had recently got a flu shot. I said, "Yes". That's when she told me about her hospital's policy about hiding the truth about the damn shots.

For pet owners : There's lots of pressure on pet owners to give their dogs and cats all kinds of vaccines. I'm constantly getting e-mails from the veterinarian : "Time to for your dog to get this vaccine shot and that vaccine shot". Please go online and learn about the possible side effects of the animal vaccines for pets. The animal vaccines also have serious side effects on our dog and cat companions.

Edward Jenner was a con-merchant who made a lot of money by promoting an "old wives' tale" (actually a milkmaid's misguided belief) that was, and is, totally false.

You don't prevent disease by bypassing the body's immune system.

NO vaccine ever protects against ANYTHING.

Even if the vaccines worked, which they don't, nobody is going to get the flu every year. I last had it about 40 years ago, in the mid 1970s, and I've NEVER had the vaccine.

The body is perfectly capable of fighting disease without any dubious "help" from the medical profession, so the safest attitude is, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it". You can't prevent disease by treating it before you've even got it, so IF you become ill for any reason, THAT'S the time to treat it, and NEVER with vaccines. Nature provides cures for every disease, and even preventatives, so why poison yourself with something that offers no protection at all?

Over more years than I care to remember, EVERYONE I've known who's had the "flu shot" gets "flu-like" symptoms soon afterwards, and they ADMIT that it "must have" been caused by the vaccine, but still they line up every year for another dose, KNOWING it's going to make them ill. You can't fix stupid.

Even WITHOUT the added poisons, including mercury, aluminium (UK spelling) and formaldehyde (embalming fluid), I'd NEVER take a vaccine because THEY DON'T WORK.

Try this. "We're all going to get old and die eventially, but aging can be prevented if we take a large dose of cyanide while we're still in our teens".

I guarantee that if some bloke in a white coat said that, idiots would be queuing up to take the "anti-aging shot" containing pure cyanide.

Eugenicists might say it's better that way. Clear the rejects out before they get a chance to breed.

Finally, we're told vaccines contain "live but weakened" agents of the disease they're supposed to protect against, but this can't possibly be true in the presence of embalming fluid (formaldehyde), which is used to preserve dead bodies and biological specimens for the simple reason that NOTHING can survive in it, including the agents of decay.

The Best Sites Exposing The Truth About Israel's 9:11 Attacks On America

Best Sites For Exposing The Apollo Moon Landings Hoax!

Fair Use Notice

Fair Use Notice

§ 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use40 Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include — (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

About Myself

Canadian male, age 57..(Hard to believe I am that old..)
Sickened by the lies of history, and how our education system has ruined and failed our childrens' minds, I decided it was time to take a stand and put up real articles of truthful information.
Willing to fight to see truth come out, and to have the true criminals on our planet exposed for their crimes against humanity.
I am in this for the truth and where ever the truth leads me!
********************************************************
Northerntruthseeker is fully responsible for all content in this blog. If any errors or omissions are deemed necessary for correction of material, it will be placed into the articles affected, and notice will be put up for all readers. Northerntruthseeker will never accept money, personal gifts, or any threats, given for any material posted in this blog.
The information articles in this blog are free for everyone to take and spread to others.
In these times of uncertainty, people deserve the truth no matter how harsh it may be!