TurboFlash gives the USB-Stick a performance boost of up to 60% read and possible write too. Acording to the packaging the default speed is about 25MB/s read and 40MB/s with Turbo. Which i guess, would be the same kind of improvement for all sticks.

Open question: I think this is for a running system only. What when I boot from it?

The way TurboFlash is implemented, one can only use it on a running system, it seems.But maybe, if one of our talented driver writers, has a look at the principle behind it, there can be a USB-driver which uses the technique also for booting.

But imo the advantage to have a faster bootdriver for USB, is too small to justify the work. Most people don't boot anymore directly from USB, but use Rambooting. This means, that a USB-Driver will be used only after the booting is already done.

Can you post a link to the actual source of this info? (I mean apart the ads byt the actual manufacturer)

I've learned about it from a few german reviews, but couldn't find an english on to post.If german is good enough for you, let me know.

It seems like it is something "triggered" as Autorun.exe ( i.e. exactly what we are trying to disable completely with Ninja Pendisk ).

Since it is not a U3 device, i don't think it can autostart without user help. Anyway it is an install routine. Once the software is installed. it is no loger needed on the stick unless one goes to a computer which has the software not yet installed.

At first sight it seems a lot NOT like a driver.

Yes agree. But so far i have found zip on how it does or possibly could work.Oh and by the way, after install the host computer needs to be restarted, which could speak for a driver.

if you go to a pc that doesn't have the app installed, can you still acces verything normal?
if not then its a sort of zip app that compressed your data, witch meens that if your file is normaly 30mb and is now 20 it can be read faster. and your processor is so fast these days that you wont notice it decompressing.
so at the end there is less to be read from the usbstick, you would save space to

1. does it give the SAME speed at boot time even on the legacy motherboard (which only support usb 1.1 at boot time ?)
2. does it need something like PLOP to achieve the above (if it really can do what i posted above)

It replaces the tube connecting the fuel tank with the carburetor / injection unit.

It has the same size like the existing one.
It has the same appearence like the existing one.

BUT: It has a built in magic magnetic power.
And this magnetic power will cause that the fluence of the fuel is consolidated to an optimum, and therefore your car will need much less fuel, compared with the standard tube.

I'm going to offer this in the WEB:

Billions of intelligent people will laugh. But thousands (maybe millions) of less intelligent people will order.

if you go to a pc that doesn't have the app installed, can you still acces verything normal?if not then its a sort of zip app that compressed your data, witch meens that if your file is normaly 30mb and is now 20 it can be read faster. and your processor is so fast these days that you wont notice it decompressing.so at the end there is less to be read from the usbstick, you would save space to

can sombody confirm this?

The Stick can be accessed with or without Turbo. So no, data is not compressed.

1. does it give the SAME speed at boot time even on the legacy motherboard (which only support usb 1.1 at boot time ?)2. does it need something like PLOP to achieve the above (if it really can do what i posted above)

In a best chance situation, the turbo works by a special driver which does some trickery with the USB Protokoll. Since one can't load a driver in BIOS. Bootspeed up until Windows driver takes over, will not be able to benefit.

If the driver works for USB1.1 too, which is unknown, then acording to marketing, it could improve USB speed by up to 80%, which would be ~2MB readspeed for USB1.1.

Just in case this wasn't perfectly clear. TurboFlash does improve upon the speed, it does not create a new speed.Therefore, differently fast USB-Sticks will end up with different read and write speeds, even when TurboFlash is used.

I got an email today from you guys about USB flash drive performance and referencing this thread. I recently went shopping for a largish high performance UFD to serve as a multi-os boot key. The drive that I came up with was the Corsair Flash Voyager GTR 32GB. MFR claims 34GB read 28 GB write. Benchmarks (there is a good recent one at hardwarecanucks.com) show that for large block sequential IO 34GB read 20GB write is probably closer to the mark. Just thought I'd mention it here as I didn't see it mentioned in any of the tables. It is relatively new, and physically large (about the size of a Swiss army knife).

Then there was Orthy. Not the best written imo. But a nice comparison of the Midnight with SanDisks Contour.

And AwardFabrik which has a very good comparison of Turbo mode vs.default mode.

There were also some interesting reviews in internetshops from people who bought this stick. One posted, that the Turbo worked, once installed, on all his sticks, but i have not been able to find any other source to confirm this.

Why not everyone reading this Topic forget about obsoleteUSB 2.0 Read/Write speeds clocked in the whatever MBThrow them all in the garbage.Replace them with USB 3.0 Sticks and external drivesWith 5 Gb/s gross throughput, USB 3.0 provides ten times the bandwidth of USB 2.0Anyone reading this that is an IT TECH knows this alreadyMore and more motherboards incorporate an additional controller to support the fast interface.For older Computers , there are USB 3.0 Interface Cards and Cables.

So despite your investment in USB 2.0 Sticks and External Drives,Backup the Data off of them , throw them in the Garbage, they are dinosaurs.Invest a little money and upgrade your USB.You will be very glad you did.