Oppression Instead of Admission, Part IV

As soon as Part III of this work went to print, asserting in its
penultimate paragraph that the worse things are the more the Rulers mash
the throttle pedal of the runaway train, they upped the ante, again.The Guardian informed that Great Britain worries about too
few Muslims in its army and aims to bolster their recruitment. The
smiling portrait therein
of British Defence Secretary John Reid, with his senior military
advisor, Imam Asim Hafiz, should forever hang in the corridors of
Whitehall right along the scowling portrait of Mr. Reid’s predecessor,
Winston Churchill, and his military advisors.As to Hafiz, he asserted that diversity is “one of the UK’s
strengths” and “the values of the armed forces” are fully compatible
with the values of Islam. But, gentle reader, before one hatches bad
feelings toward Imam Asim, recall, as per the antecedent chapter in this
work, what the fabled American general William Casey said on the same
subject, and what a Battalion Commander in the even more fabled 101st Airborne Division wrote.

Consider that even as The Mirror acknowledges “ONE MILLION”
(their emphasis) British children victims of sex abuse gangs and a
Labour MP cries useless tears over this without acknowledging her
party’s direct culpability, they refuse to identify who these “grooming” gangs are.Should Muslims be blamed for putting to work demolition tools handed
to them, wrapped in festive ribbons, by smiling Whites-in-charge?

So let’s repeat the question: Why Are They Doing It?

These are intelligent, educated, Christian-in-varying-degrees (yes,
even the atheists are) beneficiaries of the best that the highest, i.e.
Western, civilization this world has ever seen could offer, and often
born in the most privileged social strata. Why are they sawing off the
branch on which they and their descendants are perched — moreover, a
branch that has taken well over six thousand years to sprout and grow
through fire, drought, hail, ice and locust?

I often use sardonic terms to describe these people, usually taken
from camp sci-fi films of the ’50s-’60s or from the medical dictionary
of psychopathology and brain diseases. Some milder critical pundits do
that too, e.g. PJ Media’s “Obama Now Meets the Colloquial Definition of Insanity.”
But Obama is, for sure, far from insane; he knows exactly what he is
doing and is clever and resourceful in doing it. And I use such mocking
terms only as shorthand, standing for a much more complex phenomenon.

They, whom I call on occasion THEY — like in They Came from Beyond Space
(Embassy Pictures, 1967) — are really only the Loons in the Club of
Loons, Crooks and Traitors ruling the West, with major assistance from
innumerable indentured servant drones — perhaps two thirds of the West’s
total population of one billion plus.

They Came from Beyond Space, but our Loons came from Harvard and Oxford

On Monday evening the Muslim Student Union of UC Irvine culminated its Islam Awareness Week with a speaking appearance by UCI Professor of Film and Media Sohail Daulatzai. His topic was the life of Malcolm X, who is Daulatzai's ultimate hero. It was an hour and a half of a sickening trashing of America by a man who came to this country as a boy from Pakistan. This was the second time I have listened to this man tear apart this country. It is not pleasant listening, but like the previous time in May 2013, I felt it was important to attend, videotape it, and report it. Of course, as always, the MSU tried to prevent me from filming. However, I politely asserted my rights and filmed it anyway.

Prior to the event, I contacted the campus police and advised them I was attending the event. Over the past year, I had been assured by the UCIPD that I had every right to videotape, that they had been in error last year when they prevented me from videotaping a speech per the request of the MSU, and that all student organizations had been advised of the videotaping policy at UCI.

Nevertheless, as Daulatzai was being introduced to the sparse crowd of about 35 MSU students, the young lady moderator announced that recording was not allowed and anyone attempting to record would be asked to leave. I promptly raised my hand and politely informed her that this was a public event and that the right to film was absolute and had been affirmed to me by the campus police with whom I had just(again) consulted. The event began and I commenced to record. If the video shows the back of a head of a student in front of me that's because the young man sat in front of me in an attempt to obstruct my view. He only partially succeeded. However, it is the audio-the words- that matter.

About 30-40 minutes later, a young MSU student approached me and politely asked me to cease recording. I once again explained my right to film and showed him a brochure with the UCI policy that allowed the public to videotape as long as it was in compliance with UCI policy 900.30, of which I also had a copy. The young man said that section 900.30 had a portion which allowed the sponsoring organization to ban videotaping. (If that is in there, I sure can't find it.) At any rate, I politely suggested that he consult with the UCIPD and that if a campus police officer instructed me not to film, I would cease. He agreed and left. No campus police officer ever came into the room. I continued to film assuming that the UCIPD had explained the policy to him. As stated, I have been advised by UCIPD that all student organizations have been advised of the UCI videotaping policy. Either the MSU didn't get the memo or they tried to get around it. On Tuesday, I contacted the UCIPD and related the events. They responded that they would reach out to the MSU.

It is hard to summarize what Daalatzai said over the course of 90 minutes (including q and a) because he rambles on all over the place. He also has a very noticeable verbal tic, in which he ends his sentences with "right?" In 90 minutes, he must have done it over 500 times. He is also a boring speaker in spite of the nasty things he says about this country.

At any rate, Daulatzai took his audience through the life of Malcolm X interspersed with three video clips of Malcolm's public utterances. Here are some notable things Daulatzai had to say: (I will be paraphrasing, but the video is there.)

He said that Martin Luther King was about to leave the civil rights movement when he was assassinated because he had given up on America. He had reportedly stated at some point that he was afraid they were "integrating into Hell". Daulatzai also seemed to imply a connection between King's coming out against the Viet Nam war and his assassination.

Daulatzai spoke of an understanding between civil rights leaders and the government during the Cold War in that they (civil rights leaders) would support the Cold War in exchange for civil rights reforms for American blacks.

He also claimed that Patrice Lamumba, the Congolese leader who was ousted from power and executed in 1961, was murdered and cut into pieces by the CIA. Did you know that?

Of course, there were the requisite references to Ferguson, Chapel Hill, Eric Garner et al. As to Chapel Hill, Daulatzai proclaimed the murders of three Muslim students as a hate crime. Did you know that?

"Yeh, I did."

He must have an inside source with the police investigating the case.

In reply to a question on how different (ethnic) parts of the Muslim community could come together, Daulatzai again rambled all over the place. He started talking about Iraq!! He talked about how our military killed ("by conservative estimates") 500,000 Iraqis. He quoted other estimates that said 1.2 to 1.3 million Iraqis were killed by our military. Of course he did not qualify that by saying anything about the number of Iraqi troops or later insurgents who were killed in battle, nor did he say anything about Iraqis killed by post-invasion insurgents. The impression left is that the US military killed 500,000-1.3 million Iraqis- period.

I wasn't going to ask any questions during the q and a, but toward the end, he invited comments, so I raised my hand twice. Of course, I was ignored. Here is what I would have said:

"I am old enough to remember Malcolm X and recall when he was assassinated. Malcolm was killed by the Nation of Islam on the orders of Elijah Mohammad because he (Malcolm) had left the NoI, had publicly criticized it and was exposing the corruption and sexual abuses of Elijah Mohammad. (Daulatzai had praised the NoI in his remarks but papered over the fact that they had killed Malcolm.) Furthermore, history has shown that those like King who followed the path of non-violence have been proven correct while those who preached violence have been proven to be wrong. Malcolm X, for his part, did nothing to advance integration in this country. Finally, to the young people in the audience- in spite of all our dark chapters and mistakes in our history, America is still the greatest and freest country in the world, and it does deserve your love and loyalty in spite of what the speaker has told you tonight."

I doubt that would have made much of an impact. As we prepared to leave, the young man who had been sitting in front of me told me I needed to get a life.

This man Daulatzai was probably not even born when Malcolm X died. He didn't live through the civil rights era in America. Yet he implied that the civil rights movement accomplished next to nothing and that the conditions for black Americans have not improved since those days. Not having lived in America through that era what frame of reference does he have other than what he has read in books or been told by others?

It is sad and alarming that our universities have professors like this (of film and media, no,less) who
are putting these ideas into the minds of our young people-especially young Muslim students. Daulatzai, for better or worse, has his right of free speech, and he is entitled to his opinion about America. That right also includes the rights of the public to attend public events and record what is spoken at those events. As a teacher, I do not videotape students or what they say. I only begin my recording when the event's speaker begins. The public has a right to know what is being said in public speaking events on public university campuses.

So here it is. It is long. It is boring. The visual quality is less than optimal.There are a couple of brief snippets missing (at the beginning and end) because the memory card was being changed. But I hope the reader will take the time to listen to it because it is that important to be aware of what our students are being taught in American universities.

Good write up on the song is here: Elton John, "Madman Across The Water"Of course, the earliest Elton John was by far his best music before he sold totally sold out.Our perception and reality is built so much upon past experiences, bad, good and from the middle. Inside out or outside in? Even if I knew beyond any doubt, I would not tell you. Most of us are still trying to figure it all out.PatriotUSA

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - A
wave of bomb attacks around Baghdad killed 28 people on Tuesday, as at
least seven explosions struck in or near the Iraqi capital, police and
medical sources said.

Fifteen people were killed in the Jisr Diyala district,
southeast of the city, in two blasts on Tuesday evening, one of them
caused by a car bomb. Earlier, five other explosions hit northern and
southern neighbourhoods, the sources said.

There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the
attacks, which come as Iraqi security forces battle Islamic State
militants who control large areas of north and west Iraq, and who have
claimed many recent bombings in Baghdad.

The Free Methodist Church's website said the woman, identified as the
Reverend Phyllis Sortor, had been abducted in the central Kogi state.

"The US Embassy has been notified, and the State Department and the FBI
are working with local authorities to find and rescue her," it added.
According to the AFP news agency, masked gunmen came into a school where Rev Sortor was working and took her hostage.

On the morning of the White House Summit on "Countering Violent Extremism" an invocation was read in Arabic by Sheikh Sa'ad Musse Roble. It was translated into English by another gentleman named Abdisalam Adam, a Minneapolis imam. However, the English translation left out a key part of the reading from Sura 5 verse 32 of the Koran.

Gates of Vienna has the report. Watch the video and see how the translator cuts out least half of the actual content.

Of late, it seems I have been unable to catch even a slight break, orthopedically speaking.Leaving personal matters out of the mix here, I am literally unable to write much or for very long.On December 18th of last year I had right shoulder surgery #10 and it was a bit of a gamble as most surgeries are and to say that my right shoulder is ABNORMAL after 10 surgeries, is an understatement worthy of the current Obama regime. The only reason my right shoulder still functions at all is due to three excellent orthopedic surgeons since 1983 who were able to repair and restore the joint integrity after the first two 'surgeons' severely, permanently damaged the joint due to their incompetence. Recovery is slow, I am old(er) and this last surgery was strictly to buy me time and to please the god's at Workman's Compensation before a total joint replacement is approved, down the road. Hopefully, years down the road or I am called home. I am very grateful for the WC coverage, lifetime medical on both shoulders and my claim was settled after a long, nasty fight, under the old rules before 1992, when said rules and regulations were 'overhauled' to the detriment of injured workers. I settled for $18,000 and lifetime medical over a one time, lump sum settlement of $88,000 and five years of medical coverage. I Had the best attorney who greeted you with a cigar and a glass of Port if you were so inclined. It did not matter if it was a 7:30 AM appointment or later in the day. We got along extremely well and thankfully he started stocking whiskey after I lodged a snarky complaint with his drop dead, beautiful office manager. I knew he would not listen to me and I was correct.If it was just this, I would not be grumbling BUT of course, there is more. A week after shoulder surgery I developed Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in the left hand and wrist. Of joy of joys, now both arms are fubared enough that I am unable to type or write much. Chalk it up to working too many years in the woods, doing hard factory, machine shop work, pulling on the green chain in old growth mills, fighting fires, even years of being an optician, mix in hard contact sports, too many fights and brawls when I was young, foolish and never thought my body would tear down. Add the above to the three spinal fusions and well, here I am at number thirteen. Treatment is ongoing and the carpal tunnel is severe and surgery is looming. Just an annoyance and something to add to my list. I got my orthopedic surgeon's attention when I told him I had dropped two glasses and a coffee mug out of my left hand. The coffee mug hit my left foot and broke two toes, go figure. I go barefoot as much as I can as I hate shoes, always have and this drove me Mum crazy when I was a little kid. Thankfully, the coffee mug did not break as it is my favorite. I may be getting a program that does voice to text here in the near future if Voc Rehab helps with the program. After years of getting injured, whacked on to the tune of now thirteen orthopedic/spinal procedures and being officially disabled (no, not mentally disabled as some of you are obviously thinking) since 2000, I now qualify for Voc Rehab services. No tears please, I have literally earned this one and just do what I and so many others seem to do best; keep making the best lemonade ever with the lemons that seem to grow on my trees. I planted apple, peach, pear trees and they all seem to grow lemons. I have a magical touch with roses and maybe it is the thorns? Anyway, just a quick update of sorts and I am typing and writing bits and pieces for future use. I will do an occasional post when symptoms settle down enough or I am just so pissed off about it all I just will not give a damn about how it makes me feel pain wise, later on. But this is the attitude that has gotten me into trouble when I reflect back on much of my past. Damn it to hell, I hate it when that happens. Pain is awesome teacher if we listen. I just listened too late, meh.

Remember this, no matter how tough or hard things are for you, somewhere in the world, your country, your neighbourhood, your block, there are people who would GLADLY trade places with you and think your life, my life be paradise. Just one of the reasons why I have always tried to pay it forward even when I do not have any extra to really spare. Attitude is key in this life.I am always, your most obedient and humble servant. PatriotUSA

Deputy State Department Spokeswoman Marie Harf has had a rough week. First she talked about jobs as a way to fight the ISIS ideology. Then, when she became the laughing stock of the nation (at least among those who pay attention), she doubled down and dug herself deeper by expounding on the "root causes of violent extremism" (poverty, lack of opportunity, lack of freedom etc).

Of course, Harf is merely a mouthpiece for her president and her boss, John Kerry. These are the silly platitudes that they are mouthing while steadfastly refusing to mention the term, "Islamic terror". They prefer "violent extremism. Thus, they hold a silly 3-day conference at the White House, moderated by Joe Biden and invite America's top Islamists to participate.

But back to Harf. If I may inform her as to the most direct root cause of-not violent extremism- but Islamic terrorism:

Ms. Harf, I invite you to read the Koran. I invite you to read the hadith, which are the recorded sayings of the Prophet Mohammad. I invite you to read the biography of Mohammad.

As to the Koran, one has to know how to read and interpret it. That is because the Koran is not recorded chronologically, rather from the longest suras (chapters) to the shortest. (Sura one is an exception. It is only seven verses long and is recited multiple times a day by Muslims during prayers.)

It is important to know which suras were from Mohammad's earlier Mecca period, in which he was merely preaching the new religion, and which were from his Medina period, in which he was leading armies of conquest, taking captives, executing prisoners, taking booty, and taking their women and children as slaves. It is in the Medina suras that the language becomes hateful and violent.

Muslim leaders in the West love to quote the earlier verses, which appear peaceful and tolerant. What they don't tell us is that over the centuries Muslim scholars have agreed that in case of contradiction, the latter verse in time will abrogate that written earlier. The final major sura in time (Sura 9) is arguably the most violent and thus would abrogate anything written earlier that is in disagreement.

Back to Sura one. It ends with a plea to Allah to guide one along the straight path, not the path of those who have incurred His wrath nor that of those who have gone astray. According to the Hadith, Mohammad was asked by one of his followers who that referred to. Mohammad answered that the former were Jews and the latter were Christians.

Of course, there are thousands of hadith and Islamic scholars, who to this day study them in a complex effort to determine which are factual and which are not ("Strong hadith vs weak hadith"). Much of it is concerned with the line of testimony from one person back to another all the way back to the mouth of the Prophet. The two most trustworthy sources of the hadith are considered Bukhari and Muslim, named after earlier scholars who compiled and studied them.

This brings us back to ISIS, its followers, the lone wolves in the West who carry out their wishes, not to mention Al Qaeda, Hamas, Hizbollah, Boko Haram and all the others. To say that they are non-Islamic is absurd. They are carrying out their deeds in the name of Islam and they have solid textual basis for their actions. The killing of Christians and Jews is commanded in the Koran if they will not convert or submit to dhimmi status and pay the jizya tax. . Behead people? That's how Mohammad and his armies killed their captives. Take women and girls into sexual slavery? That is precisely what Mohammad and his armies did with the wives and children of the opposing soldiers they killed. Look for the phrase in the Koran that refers to "those which your right hand possesses". That refers to captives and slaves. Child brides? That goes back to the example of Mohammad, who took Aisha as his bride at the age of 6 and consummated the marriage when she was 9 and he was in his 50s. Of course, this was common practice in the 7th century and Mohammad was hardly unique in that regard. However, when you see it in practice today in some quarters of the Islamic world, it can be justified because it was done by Mohammad-the most perfect man, whom all Muslims should seek to emulate. Thus, should the world be so shocked when ISIS and Boko Harem take young girls captive and marry them off to their own fighters?

It is true that the Christian and Jewish texts have violent verses, yet they were left in the dust centuries ago and are not practiced today. It is also true that most Muslims in the world today do not engage in these practices or terrorism because they prefer to merely get on in their lives, raise their families, and live in peace with the rest of the 21st century global community. Yet, they are in a very weak position should they try to engage in a debate with the jihadists because they cannot win such a debate based on Islamic texts and the life of the Prophet. The fear factor is, of course, another deterrent. They risk being called apostates and killed. Apostasy is a capital offense under sharia law. What does that tell you?

I fully understand that no American president or secretary of state can publicly say what I have written above. That would set the entire Muslim world against us even though they know amongst themselves that it is all very true. Even George W Bush understood that. It is much better to enlist Islamic countries to help fight the war on terror-even take the lead on the ground since it is they who are most immediately threatened. Today, Egypt and Jordan understand that. At the same time, however, it serves no useful purpose to mislead the public as to the threat we face and to pretend that it can be defeated with a jobs program, or more education, or by installing democracy. The jihadists of today cut across all spectrum. Many are educated including the leader of ISIS, who holds a PhD in Islamic studies. Many are wealthy including none other than Usama bin Laden. There are thousands of ISIS fighters in Iraq, Syria and now Libya, who arrived from the West. At the same time, there are hundreds of millions of people in the world who are poor, uneducated and living under dictatorships. They don't resort to terrorism.

To fight and defeat this enemy requires honesty and strength something the West today sorely lacks. It has become a tired phrase, but it is nonetheless true. We can't defeat an enemy if we cannot identify it. And yes: The Islamic State is definitely Islamic.

Yesterday, it was reported that the terrorist-breeding Islamic Cultural Society of Boston was an invitee to the big White House summit on "Countering Violent Extremism", which is being hosted by Joe Biden.

"That's a big f-----' deal."

Today we learn that Salam al Marayati, director of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, is also participating.

In addition to what is written above, I can add that Marayati is one of the nation's leading dissemblers and propagandists. MPAC is nothing more than an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood. Marayati has consistently condemned every attempt by the FBI and local police to fight homegrown terror and identify terrorists in our midst.

In addition, Marayati is one of some 200 leading Muslim figures in the US who are recipients of the Freedom Pledge letter from Former Muslims United in 2009 and 2012, which asked them to sign a simple letter to the effect that Americans who have left Islam should not be harmed. To date, only two have signed and Marayati is not one of them. I personally asked him about this in December 201,2 and he told me he would not sign because there is no death penalty in Islam for apostasy-a blatant lie.

As things are shaping up, no doubt this conference will conclude with a joint statement that ISIS has nothing to do with Islam, that terror in general has nothing to do with Islam, that there are many other non-Muslim terror groups out there that are a greater threat to our national security, and that Israel must stop building new settlements, stop their intransigence and end "the occupation and Palestinian suffering."

Have I left anything out?

Dear Reader. Not only has the camel gotten his nose under the tent, he is the tent.

Saturday morning, we awoke to the news of another Islamic terror attack in Europe, this time in Copenhagen. The target? Swedish Mohammed cartoonist Lars Vilks and fellow panelists at a free speech event. Thus, Charlie Hebdo comes to Denmark. Where will be the next attack? By the time we find out, hundreds more people will have died in senseless and horrific attacks all over the Middle East.

And as we await the next Boston Marathon-style attack in the US, the Islamist lobby here is in full PR swing. Not only do they react with each foreign attack with hastily-arranged events in which speakers condemn the latest attack, but insist that it has nothing-absolutely nothing- to do with Islam. They know that their audiences will be filled with many gullible non-Muslims who are only too eager to gobble up the words of peace but too intellectually lazy to read the Koran in depth or study the life of the Prophet Mohammad in order to make sense of it all. If they would just do some background research on the speakers they are listening to instead of blindly believing that they are "bridge-builders". The only bridge these much-ballyhooed speakers want to build is a bridge to an Islamic caliphate under sharia law.

But there is more. February is Black History Month. The cynical opportunists have latched onto this to link it with their favorite charge of Islamophobia. They are trotting out Ferguson, Treyvon Martin and other police shootings and linking them to the charge that America is racist against blacks and racist against Muslims-even though Islam is hardly a race. Add to that the recent tragic murders of three Muslim students near the University of North Carolina campus by a deranged jerk who was in a rage over a parking space. As I write this, there is nothing to show that this was an act of someone who simply hated Muslims. The guy apparently hates everybody. No mind. There is an agenda here and a narrative that must be presented to the public and the world that America is Islamophobic and Muslims in America are not safe.

Instead of celebrating people like Martin Luther King, the radicals in academia are trotting out Malcolm X, a man who did nothing to help bring about integration in America. Left unsaid will be the fact that Malcolm was murdered by Nation of Islam members on the orders of Elijah Mohammed because Malcolm had left the Nation of Islam and was exposing the corruption and sexual abuses of the "Honorable" Elijah Mohammed. Audiences will also hear implications that Malcolm was instead a victim of some murky white conspiracy.

Universities are lining up speakers and panels all over the country to explain to their students all the things that are evil in the world, America, capitalism, Israel-you name it. They will use power point presentations to explain how there is a link between how Israel treats Palestinians to the shootings of Michael Brown, Treyvon Martin, and the choking death of Eric Garner by the NYPD.

This, Dear Reader is what higher education in America has degenerated into.

First Cartoonists then Jews. The pattern in Copenhagen was similar to that in Paris. After opening fire at a free speech event in Copenhagen featuring Swedish Mohammad cartoonist Lars Vilks, the gunman struck after midnight at a synagogue killing a Jewish man guarding the entrance before later being killed himself by police.

by Eric Odem, ARRA News Service: Several days ago we reported that a 4-Star General is saying the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated all levels of Federal Government, including senior level positions. Muslim Brotherhood is, without question, a terrorist organization and it’s shocking enough to learn they met with State Department officials. But it gets worse now that a member of the Muslim Brotherhood is saying a White House official also attended the meeting.

Via Free Beacon.A Muslim Brotherhood member who recently was hosted at the State Department along with several of the Islamist group’s key allies now claims that a White House official also was present in that meeting, according to recent remarks.

Abdel Mawgoud al-Dardery, a Brotherhood member and former Egyptian parliamentarian, was in the United States late last month along with a delegation of fellow Brotherhood leaders and allies.

The Brotherhood-aligned delegation caused an international stir after the Washington Free Beacon revealed that it had been hosted for a meeting with several State Department officials.

Another member of the group, a Brotherhood-aligned judge in Egypt, posed for a picture while at Foggy Bottom in which he held up the Islamic group’s notorious four-finger Rabia symbol.

While the State Department initially misled reporters about the meeting, it was eventually forced to admit that several Obama administration officials — including a deputy assistant secretary for democracy, human rights, and labor—and State Department officials met with the delegation.

Al-Dardery now claims that in addition to these State Department representatives, a member of the White House also participated in the sit-down.

“The trip started for the [Egyptian] community in New York and New Jersey,” al-Dardery said in a recent interview with the Arabic language pro-Muslim Brotherhood El Sharq TV. “Then during the trip we undertook to meet with some from the ‘establishment,’ the administration, in the United States. And we met at the State Department and there was a representative there from the White House.”All of this happening while several Democrats in Congress are refusing to attend a joint session where Israel’s Prime Minister will speak.

It did not take long for Muslims to scream Muslim hatred, Islamophobia, and that Craig Hicks hated those he murdered because they were Muslims. Being Muslims, the father whom I do indeed feel sorry for, have compassion for after such a tragic loss, wasted little time in playing the crybaby Muslim. CAIR being CAIR, of course jumped right into the clown car of hatred against us who are the Counterjihad.

This guy Craig Hicks, was a total progressive moonbat who just happened to be an
atheist and rant all over social media to any and all who might listen for
more than five seconds. His neighbors could have been any religion but
sadly for the counterjihad they were Muslims and now it will turn into
somewhat of bloodbath that is going to have to run it’s course. Since
when has the lapdog, lying LSM ever bothered to wait a bit for FACTS to
come out? Rarely. This country and the greater west is so cry baby
sensitive to anything like this, now the hydra with multiple heads of
multiculturalism, diversity and political correctness will be free to
roam and maim for a time. The Christian Counterjihadists and the atheist Counterjihadists will both have to take their shots. The Counterjihad, overall will be taken to task, branded as what we are NOT and it is critical that this not be allowed to divide the Counterjihad as was done Anders Behring Breivik.

Hicks followed and liked many far left progressive sites, blogs and 'sources' which included the Southern Poverty Law Center. Quite revealing what a far left, moonbat screwball he was. The left must be crushed no AR-15 or large capacity clips were used in the crime, at least as far as what is currently known.The Council on American Islamic Relations said Hicks
described himself on Facebook as an "anti-theist" and has posted
condemnations of all religions. One post, a picture from United Atheists
of America, asks "why radical Christians and radical Muslims are so
opposed to each others' influence when they agree about so many
ideological issues."

"Based on the brutal nature of this crime,
the past anti-religion statements of the alleged perpetrator, the
religious attire of two of the victims, and the rising anti-Muslim
rhetoric in American society, we urge state and federal law enforcement
authorities to quickly address speculation of a possible bias motive in
this case," Nidal Awad, the council's national executive director, said
in a statement. "Our heartfelt condolences go to the families and loved
ones of the victims and to the local community."

On Twitter, Rep.
Keith Ellison, D-Minn., the first Muslim to be elected to Congress,
said, "My thoughts and prayers are with the families and loved ones of
those senselessly murdered in Chapel Hill last night
#MuslimLivesMatter."

CAIR and Muslims, still riding, still stealing on the hatred the Black grievance industry heaped upon the nation after Travon Martin and Michael Brown.

A Facebook profile bearing Craig Hicks' name and photo
paints a picture of a vehement atheist who shared anti-Muslim and
anti-Christian posts and links. Yet CAIR and Ellison want this pushed as a hate crime against Muslims.Source.

ALL LIVES MATTER. Not just white, not just black, not just brown, not just yellow, all lives matter.

Where where they when the butcher of Ft. Hood, Nidal Hassan murdered and maimed so many? I could site so many more examples of murderous, cruel, sick, senseless jihad waged by Muslims, Islam to put CAIR's accusations into the toilet but I am in extreme pain and tired. Those who tread here know the score about Islam, sharia law and that so many Muslims support the violence that fundamentalist Islam wages with such hatred and impunity.Gates of Vienna has captured the sentiment and climate that this crime will quite possibly spew and vomit.

Thanks for stopping by. I am as always, your most obedient and humble servant. PatriotUSA

Well it's all right, riding around in the breeze
Well it's all right, if you live the life you please
Well it's all right, doing the best you can
Well it's all right, as long as you lend a hand.

You can sit around and wait for the phone to ring (End of the Line)
Waiting for someone to tell you everything (End of the Line)
Sit around and wonder what tomorrow will bring (End of the Line)
Maybe a diamond ring.

Well it's all right, even if they say you're wrong
Well it's all right, sometimes you gotta be strong
Well it's all right, As long as you got somewhere to lay
Well it's all right, everyday is Judgment Day.

Maybe somewhere down the road aways (End of the Line)
You'll think of me, wonder where I am these days (End of the Line)
Maybe somewhere down the road when somebody plays (End of the Line)
Purple haze.

Well it's all right, even when push comes to shove
Well it's all right, if you got someone to love
Well it's all right, everything'll work out fine
Well it's all right, we're going to the end of the line
Don't have to be ashamed of the car I drive (End of the Line).

I'm glad to be here, happy to be alive (End of the Line)
It don't matter if you're by my side (End of the Line)
I'm satisfied

Well it's all right, even if you're old and gray
Well it's all right, you still got something to say
Well it's all right, remember to live and let live
Well it's all right, the best you can do is forgive.

Well it's all right, riding around in the breeze
Well it's all right, if you live the life you please
Well it's all right, even if the sun don't shine
Well it's all right, we're going to the end of the line

About 10,000 Muslims gathered on Downing Street in London today to warn Britons about the dangers of publishing offensive cartoons. The above speech by someone identified as Abu Tahir makes it clear that freedom of speech that leads to the insulting of the Islamic prophet leads to freedom of action by Muslims (read: violence), and that the British Parliament must pass a law that would criminalize the criticism of the Prophet Muhammad.

We are in a vicious circle. Horrific acts of terror perpetrated by Muslim jihadists around the world lead to public outcries. Serious scholars search for answers in the Koran and the life and sayings of Muhammad. Many of their findings are troubling. Satirists use humor to make their point. Muslims are offended and protest-often violently. Acts of violent retribution are carried out-sometimes in horrific fashion.

Solution? The Islamists say that criticism of Islam and the Prophet must be silenced-by criminal law, no less. Than there will be peace. Non-Muslims in the West say that we cannot and will not give up our freedom of speech and expression, and if certain immigrants don't like it, they can leave and go back where they came from.

You see the vicious circle?

I vote that we never surrender our freedoms. Those who don't want to live in a country with freedom of expression can go elsewhere, where the laws they wish are enforced. There are forces at work today that simply do not go together and never will.

Hazel Blears(Salford and Eccles) (Lab): The Prime Minister has said on a
number of occasions in this House that we face a long-term
generational struggle and the priority is to fight this poisonous
ideology. Will he commit now to working with the mainstream,
moderate Muslim community in this country—who see these
atrocities carried out in the name of their religion and utterly
reject them—and to having a practical programme to make that
happen?

The Prime Minister: I
absolutely commit to doing that and we have to do it not just in
Britain, but right around the world. We should be very clear that
the cause of this problem is the poisonous narrative of Islamic
extremism. Wherever there are broken states, conflict and civil
wars, we see this problem arise, whether it is Boko Haram in Nigeria,
al-Qaeda in Yemen or ISIL in Iraq and Syria. We need Muslims to
reclaim their religion from these extremists. - David Cameron, 26thSeptember 2014.

Let's not vote this damned fool back into power, eh? The world's coming unglued at the seams, and the Cameron creature does not have a clue what to do about it. He's going to protect our freedoms by aligning himself with the very people who want to take it away? The man's a tool, and he needs to get his P45 in May.

"The Special Rapporteur also reiterates his concern in relation to anti-blasphemy laws, which are inherently vague and leave the entire concept open to abuse. He wishes to underscore once again that international human rights law protects individuals and not abstract concepts such as religion, belief systems or institutions, as also affirmed by the Human Rights Committee (CCPR/C/GC/34, para. 48). Moreover, the right to freedom of religion or belief, as enshrined in relevant international legal standards, does not include the right to have a religion or belief that is free from criticism or ridicule. Indeed, the right to freedom of expression includes the right to scrutinize, debate openly, make statements that offend, shock and disturb, and criticize belief systems, opinions and institutions, including religious ones ..."

“It is impossible to
engage in intellectual discourse with National Socialism because it
is not an intellectually defensible program. It is false to speak of
a National Socialist philosophy, for if there were such an entity,
one would have to try by means of analysis and discussion either to
prove its validity or to combat it. In actuality, however, we face a
totally different situation. At its very inception this movement
depended on the deception and betrayal of one's fellow man; even at
that time it was inwardly corrupt and could support itself only by
constant lies.” (The White Rose, 2nd
pamphlet.)

“If it were possible for any
nation to fathom another people's bitter experience through a book,
how much easier its future fate would become and how many calamities
and mistakes it could avoid. But it is very difficult. There always
is this fallacious belief: “It would not be the same here; here
such things are impossible. Alas, all the evil of the twentieth
century is possible everywhere on earth.” (Solzhenitsyn, A. The
Gulag Archipelago, Harvill Press, p. x)

“For the thing I greatly feared
has come upon me,And what I dreaded has happened to me.I am
not at ease, nor am I quiet;I have no rest, for trouble comes.”

(Job 3:25-26 NKJV)

A
multicultural utopia is a theoretical and practical impossibility
that can only be defended using fallacies and lies. Each and every
time a terrorist attack is carried out by devout Muslims yelling out
the takbir, the assertion
that all cultural values are compatible is refuted. Yet some people
maintain that Islam is a religion of peace and its doctrines and
practices are compatible with our own traditional Judeo-Christian
heritage, because after all, not all Muslims are terrorists. That
may be true, but it is completely irrelevant.

A
categorical proposition is a statement which relates members of one
group to members of another. It has a subject term and a predicate
term, and it can be expressed in the following standard forms: All S
are P, No S are P, Some S are P and Some S are not P.

One
attribute of categorical propositions is quantity; this refers to
whether the proposition makes a claim about every member of the class
denoted by the subject term. The propositions 'All S are P' and 'No S
are P' both say something about all members of the class denoted by
the subject term S, so those propositions are said to be universal.
The propositions 'Some S are P' and 'Some S are not P' say something
about one or more (but not all) members of the class denoted by the
subject term S, so those propositions are said to be particular.

Another
attribute of categorical propositions is quality. A categorical
proposition claims that some or all the members of the class denoted
by the subject term are also members of the class denoted by the
predicate term, which is affirmative, or that they are not, which is
negative. So the propositions 'All S are P' and 'Some S are P' are
affirmative and the propositions 'No S are P' and 'Some S are not P'
are negative.

The
four standard form categorical propositions have traditionally been
referred to using the first four vowels of the Roman alphabet. The
universal affirmative proposition (All S are P) is called an A
proposition, the universal negative (No S are P) is an E proposition,
the particular affirmative (Some S are P) is an I proposition and the
particular negative (Some S are not P) is an O proposition.

The
logical relationship between the four standard form categorical
propositions can be shown using the square of opposition:

If
someone says that not all Muslims are terrorists, they are asserting
that, where the subject term is “Muslims” and the predicate term
is “terrorists”, the A proposition (All S are P) is false. What
are we to make of this?

The A proposition: All S are P. This is false - so what?

As
we can see from the
square of opposition, the A proposition “All Muslims are
terrorists” is a contradictory of the O proposition “Some Muslims
are not terrorists”. Since they are contradictories, both
propositions cannot be true at the same time, and both propositions
cannot be false. So if the A proposition “All Muslims are
terrorists” is false, then the O proposition “Some Muslims are
not terrorists” must be true.

The O proposition: Some S are not P. This is true - so what?

So
whenever we hear anyone saying that not all Muslims are terrorists,
we need to remember that in logical terms, all they are saying is
that some Muslims are not terrorists.

After
the
next Islamic terrorist attack, if anyone tells you that the
perpetrators could not have been real Muslims because not all Muslims
are terrorists, remember that what they are saying is profoundly
irrational. That is to say, they are attempting to deceive you. We
can expect nothing less from the traitor class and their lackeys in
the old fashioned media, because like the doctrines of National
Socialism, their Weltanschauung is built upon betrayal and
deceit. Like the Nazis, the new traitor class can only defend their
radical social engineering project by lying about it.

And
this irrelevant nonsense about not all Muslims being terrorists is
the least of it. The traitor class will do everything in their power
to prevent the truth about Islam from being openly discussed. They
believe they have the final solution to the question of how people
ought to live in this world, and they will not hesitate to sacrifice
the reputation, livelihood or health of anyone who threatens that
final solution with the truth.

Aleksandr
Solzhenitsyn, a man whose opinion is worth far more to us today than
anything that Cameron, Clegg and Miliband will ever write or say in
their entire lives, has told us what the consequences of this will
be.

“We have to condemn publicly the
very idea that some people have the right to repress others.
In keeping silent about evil, in burying it so deep within us that no
sign of it appears on the surface, we are implanting it, and
it will rise up a thousandfold in the future.” (Solzhenitsyn, A.
The Gulag Archipelago, Harvill Press, p. 81)

We
need to take Solzhenitsyn's warning seriously. If we do not recognise
evil for what it is, and allow politicians
to lie to us about the
motives of men like Mujahid
Abu Hamza and Ismail Ibn Abdullah when they perpetrate evil acts
inside the borders of Great Britain, then as Solzhenitsyn told us, we
are “ripping the foundations of justice from beneath new
generations”. If the traitor class have their way, no one in the
new multicultural Britain will be able to take a stand against evil.
For the traitor class, there will only be appeasement and privilege.
Young people will come of age believing that hypocrisy and deceit
will bring them prosperity. And those of us who understand what is
happening to our country will be silenced and forced into obscurity.
As Solzhenitsyn pointed out, “It is going to be uncomfortable,
horrible to live in such a country!”

Those are not my words. Those are the words of a UC Davis student government leader upon the
passing of the anti-Israel divestment vote this week at UC Davis. It has been a troubling week at UC Davis with this insidious measure that has become an annual ritual on so many American university campuses. Saturday morning, a Jewish fraternity house was defaced with two swastikas. Coincidence? Hardly.

Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers has more background on the weeks's events including a student leader involved in the divestment vote who made the above proud proclamation on her Facebook page.

Is it any wonder that swastikas are spray painted on a Jewish frat house at UCD?

I want to see how Chancellor Katehi and UC President Janet Napolitano tackle this incident. Katehi has made a statement condemning the act. The question I have is whether this incident has any legs or will it be quickly forgotten and brushed aside just as the 2010 incident with David Horowitz at UC San Diego was quickly forgotten when a female member of the Muslim Student Association endorsed the Hizbollah leader's statement that Jews should all gather in Israel so that the job of hunting them down would be made easier. Yet, during the same general time frame, UCSD was turned upside down over the Compton Cookout and the library noose incident. So will Chancellor Kethi and her vice chancellor leader a campus protest chanting, "Not in our community"? Let us see.

Donate To Patriot's Corner

Search This Blog

What We Believe

This site is dedicated to threats faced by America and the free world. Freedom and liberty are being attacked from all sides. and, a battle has once again surfaced against a very old enemy, Islam, Islamofascism, tyranny, and the regressive progressive statist. Our work is dedicated to patriots who will stand up for freedom and liberty based on the Constitution of the United States. We will defend to the death, your right to your opinion. The Founding Fathers had it mostly right!

Pacific Time & Breeze Company

Antique and Vintage Fans For Sale

IDL

Illegal Immigration, crime and facts

Patriot's Corner on Facebook

We will never forget

Eternal flame 9-11-2001

Support our troops!

Religion of Peace

III Arms

Made by Patriots for Patriots

Whiskey In a Jar

LadyRaven's blog

The Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch

Keeping A Watchful Eye On Hizb ut-Tahrir

The Institute For Jihadi Research

Exposing The Truth About Islamic Jihad

Crescent Of BetrayalAlec Rawls Error Theory

Mt. Suribachi

Hands Off

Followers

The Truth

Dr. Bill Smith

Ron Russell

Comments by contributors or sources do not necessarily reflect the position of Patriot's Corner, other Contributors or the Editors.

Fair Use: This site/blog may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as provided for in section Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Per said section, the material on this site/blog is distributed without profit to readers to view for the expressed purpose of viewing the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. Any person/entity seeking to use copyrighted material on this site/blog for purposes that go beyond "fair use," must obtain permission from the copyright owner.