It was continuing to spread like wildfire too, if anyhing it was continuing to pick up steam when Facebook killed the post.

Funny thing is Facebook can’t keep its story straight on why it did so:

Was the reason “nudity or sexual activity”?

Or was it “dangerous individuals and organizations”?

The one fact is that the article was purged from both pages just a short time apart.

Of course both explanations offered are beyond ridiculous.

It would take a pyschopath, or an incredible level of disingenuousness to see a graphic of Churchill’s emanciated victims, or a headline pointing out his enormous but little known crime, and conclude this has something to do with “nudity” or supporting “dangerous individuals”.

A “dangerous individual” according to FB

Back Checkpoint Asia’s struggle for historical literacy:

[wpedon id=”4824″ align=”center”]

Sign up for daily headlines

Unsubscribe at any time.

Invalid email address

Thanks for subscribing! Any daily digest sent will come with an unsubscribe link in the footer.

Don't miss out!

Sign up for updates from the editor

Unsubscribe at any time.

Invalid email address

Thanks for subscribing! Any email sent will come with an unsubscribe link in the footer.