Xoroshiro128+

xoroshiro128+ (named after its operations: XOR, rotate, shift, rotate) is a pseudorandom number generator intended as a successor to xorshift+. Instead of perpetuating Marsaglia's tradition of xorshift as a basic operation, xoroshiro128+ uses a shift/rotate-based linear transformation designed by Sebastiano Vigna in collaboration with David Blackman. The result is a significant improvement in speed (well below a nanosecond per integer) and a significant improvement in statistical quality.[1]

Contents

The authors of xoroshiro128+ acknowledge that it does not pass all statistical tests, stating

/* This is xoroshiro128+ 1.0, our best and fastest small-state generator
for floating-point numbers. We suggest to use its upper bits for
floating-point generation, as it is slightly faster than
xoroshiro128**. It passes all tests we are aware of except for the four
lower bits, which might fail linearity tests (and just those), so if
low linear complexity is not considered an issue (as it is usually the
case) it can be used to generate 64-bit outputs, too; moreover, this
generator has a very mild Hamming-weight dependency making our test
(http://prng.di.unimi.it/hwd.php) fail after 5 TB of output; we believe
this slight bias cannot affect any application. If you are concerned,
use xoroshiro128** or xoshiro256+.
We suggest to use a sign test to extract a random Boolean value, and
right shifts to extract subsets of bits.
The state must be seeded so that it is not everywhere zero. If you have
a 64-bit seed, we suggest to seed a splitmix64 generator and use its
output to fill s.
NOTE: the parameters (a=24, b=16, b=37) of this version give slightly
better results in our test than the 2016 version (a=55, b=14, c=36).
*/

Thus, programmers should prefer the highest bits (e.g., making a heads/tails by writing random_number < 0 rather than random_number & 1). It must be noted, though, that the same test is failed by the Mersenne Twister, WELL, etc., so the issue is mainly of academic concern.

As stated in the comments, the generator fails a Hamming-weight dependency test developed by Blackman and Vigna[3] after 8 TB of data. As a comparison, for some choice of parameters the Mersenne Twister at 607 bits fails the same test after less than a gigabyte of data.

David Meister, who implemented it in Clojure, made some valuable statements:

"This is a clojure implementation of the xoroshiro128+ PRNG described at http://xoroshiro.di.unimi.it. The algorithm has been shown to be fast and produce superior statistical results to many PRNGs shipped with languages, including Java. The statistical results have been verified in both PractRand and TestU01 by the authors. xoroshiro128+ is designed to be the successor to xorshift128+, currently used in the JavaScript engines of Chrome, Firefox and Safari. Both xorshift128+ and xoroshiro128+ have a period of 2128 but xoroshiro128+ is benchmarked by the authors as 20% faster and with 20% fewer failures in BigCrush than its predecessor."[4]

Matt Gallagher, in his study on random number generators in Swift made the following conclusion:

It looks like Xoroshiro is the best general purpose algorithm currently available. Low memory (just 128 bits of storage), extremely high performance (1.2 nanoseconds per 64-bit number, after subtracting baseline overheads) and very well distributed (beating other algorithms on a range of automated tests). Mersenne Twister might still be a better choice for highly conservative projects unwilling to switch to such a new algorithm, but the current generation of statistically tested algorithms brings a baseline of assurance from the outset that previous generations lacked.[5]