Social Media Erupts as the Art World Splits in Two Over Dana Schutz Controversy

One week ago, the very day the Whitney Biennial opened to the public, artist Parker Bright mounted a protest, via Facebook live video, against Dana Schutz‘s painting of a murdered Emmett Till in his coffin. He only knew of the painting in the first place, writer Antwaun Sargeant has pointed out, because of images on social media.

Writer Hannah Black would follow up with an open letter, posted on Facebook but since removed, calling for the painting’s removal and destruction.

With that, a searing debate opened on social media over subjects like white violence, white privilege, black suffering, the value of art, who can speak for whom, and who can comment on whose experience. Art-world observers lined up on opposing sides of the protest. Some claim an artist’s right to depict any subject they choose, and rail against what they call censorship; others point out that white privilege and the appropriation of black experience is as old as America itself, and inherently pernicious.

In posting Josephine Livingstone and Lovia Gyarkye’s argument against Schutz’s painting that was published in The New Republic, retired art dealer Zach Feuer (who once represented Schutz) said that the debate had been very educational, not least in pointing out what he considers the narrow-mindedness of some of his colleagues in the art field.

The most surprising thing about this for me has been learning that white art-world peers, who I assumed had some social…

Harking back to the 1993 Whitney Biennial, tweeter @JGLuzifer offered an updated version of Daniel Joseph Martinez’s iconic series of admission badges from that year that stated “I can’t imagine ever wanting to be white.” It was that very biennial, curated by Elisabeth Sussman in the midst of the “culture wars,” that marked the emergence of identity politics on the stage of the Whitney Biennial itself, and in the art conversation at large.

A post shared by Burn Book 👀 (@burn_book_2017) on Mar 23, 2017 at 8:37am PDT

By Thursday, hoaxers had gotten involved, penning a fake letter, supposedly from Schutz, calling for the painting to be removed in compliance with Black’s petition. Pastiche Lumumba opined that the stunt only highlighted the poor handling of the fracas on the part of the artist and the museum.

Somebody wrote the letter that Dana Schutz should have written and it got posted, which is hilarious because it just makes her and the museum look even whacker. The fake news is better than the real news.

But the art world, and even the black community within the art world, does not speak with one voice, as an Instagram post by Kara Walker, whose own work has been at the center of controversy over race and representation, pointed out.

When critic Jerry Saltz reposted Walker’s Instagram post, artist Marilyn Minter came out against the criticisms of Schutz.

Artist Kristian Kahn, similarly, found the political left just as guilty in calls for censorship as Republican Mayor Rudolph Giuliani was when he railed against Chris Ofili‘s rendition of the Virgin Mary, a lightning rod at the 1997 “Sensation”exhibition at the Brooklyn Museum.

Referring to Hannah Black’s open letter, which accused Schutz of trying to profit from tragedy, Chicago artist Robert Burnier voiced skepticism about that critique, while also suggesting that Schutz could have achieved a symbolic atonement with a different kind of depiction of Till.

Social media reaction would be nothing without arch humor, and Raymond Boisjoly cutely pointed to the controversy at the 2014 Biennial, when white artist Joe Scanlan’s work impersonating a black, female artist named Donelle Woolford sparked debate and protest.