Good morning, evening, day, or afternoon! The bigWham and blakebowling have some more updates that they've rolled out, and here they are! Nothing too big this week, but it certainly lays the groundwork out for future updates (especially the score recording).

We will now start recording scores for players at the start and end of a game. This is a partial implemention of Archiving Ranks! Hopefully, this will allow for future updates involving scores, and perhaps more Add-Ons and tools for any developers who are interested in using this feature.

Multiple Game Creation: This is currently limited to 5 at a time, but upon further field testing, we may be willing to expand it!

From now on, we will be accepting appeals from Permabanned players. This can be accomplished through an E-Ticket. We believe that giving people a second chance from the change in community and rules of old is only fair! We hope that this will allow members who have learned from their mistakes be able to come back and support a Community they love and to make it even more lively!

Sprechen wrote:I'd like to be able to create games with minimum rank requirements. For example, limiting those who can join a game to two ranks below mine and above. This works really well on a chess site I use.

You can. It's called, "private games."

But I get what you're saying. It would certainly save us from foeing cooks, right?

Sprechen wrote:I'd like to be able to create games with minimum rank requirements. For example, limiting those who can join a game to two ranks below mine and above. This works really well on a chess site I use.

You can. It's called, "private games."

But I get what you're saying. It would certainly save us from foeing cooks, right?

Private games can be a pain to fill sometimes...I would definitely use a feature that let me set a minimum for public games. It would make getting the teammate medal easier, too.

Sprechen wrote:I'd like to be able to create games with minimum rank requirements. For example, limiting those who can join a game to two ranks below mine and above. This works really well on a chess site I use.

pop on over to the Suggestions forum with your suggestions!

i think that one has been put forward many times but they'll let you know

Sprechen wrote:I'd like to be able to create games with minimum rank requirements. For example, limiting those who can join a game to two ranks below mine and above. This works really well on a chess site I use.

pop on over to the Suggestions forum with your suggestions!

i think that one has been put forward many times but they'll let you know

Thank you for allowing permabanned players to appeal! me and my friend were permabanned but we love this game so much! I bought a membership but he couldn't so I'm playing alone I hope he gets unbanned

When searching/joining games, the game list pages still looks horrible. Very drawn out list of players in each game making it difficult to get a good overview. Something in these updates have caused it.

Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.

Sprechen wrote:I'd like to be able to create games with minimum rank requirements. For example, limiting those who can join a game to two ranks below mine and above. This works really well on a chess site I use.

pop on over to the Suggestions forum with your suggestions!

i think that one has been put forward many times but they'll let you know

Unfortunatelly the suggestions forum is not very active right now. I have submitted a couple of ideas lately and got not much answer, mainly from people who said "We don't like your suggestion because it's different to how we are playing now and would force us to change our way of thinking".

Sprechen wrote:I'd like to be able to create games with minimum rank requirements. For example, limiting those who can join a game to two ranks below mine and above. This works really well on a chess site I use.

pop on over to the Suggestions forum with your suggestions!

i think that one has been put forward many times but they'll let you know

Unfortunatelly the suggestions forum is not very active right now. I have submitted a couple of ideas lately and got not much answer, mainly from people who said "We don't like your suggestion because it's different to how we are playing now and would force us to change our way of thinking".

have you got links to those because all i've seen is people point out the flaws with your suggestions.

Sprechen wrote:I'd like to be able to create games with minimum rank requirements. For example, limiting those who can join a game to two ranks below mine and above. This works really well on a chess site I use.

pop on over to the Suggestions forum with your suggestions!

i think that one has been put forward many times but they'll let you know

Unfortunatelly the suggestions forum is not very active right now. I have submitted a couple of ideas lately and got not much answer, mainly from people who said "We don't like your suggestion because it's different to how we are playing now and would force us to change our way of thinking".

have you got links to those because all i've seen is people point out the flaws with your suggestions.

Lol exactly. Oliver, this is not someting personal and you seem to see it as such. Your suggestion is an open gate for new types of cheating and abuse (survivor mode). Stop inventing stuff up. I love all novelties and I play all type of games, probably like most people completely against your idea. Most people are against it because of all its flaws, deal with it and stop making stuff up.

Otherwise, bigwham, the minimum\max rank thing has been proposed about a million times. The suggestion moderators just archive it as rejected, with no discution possible. This was lack's vision of the site. It is purely rejected each time because the previous admin was against it. Since this is such a popular request, we would be interested to have your personal opinion on the matter. Is this something that could be reconsidered to satisfy a large part of the community?