In "UBS Finds Limited Tax Fraud Involving Wealthy Americans," Julia Werdigier of The New York Times reports that "UBS has discovered only a small number of tax-fraud cases as part of an
investigation into whether the Swiss bank helped clients dodge American
taxes, the bank’s chairman, Peter Kurer, said Thursday." The actual quote from Mr. Kurer, however, says only that "[o]ur investigations have uncovered a limited number of cases of tax fraud under both U.S. and Swiss law." Later in the article, Ms Wedigier writes:

The United States Justice Department has argued that UBS, a huge bank based in Zurich that has extensive
operations in the United States, helped as many as 17,000 of its
American clients evade $300 million a year in taxes through hidden
offshore accounts. Mr. Kurer’s remarks contained no specifics about
whether he disputed the American estimate, nor did he clarify what
number of fraud cases he would regard as “limited.”

A bank chairman describes his internal investigation's results in vague terms that could mean anything, and this is translated by the reporter as "only a small number of tax-fraud cases" and put on the first page of the Business section. Cynicism, sloppiness, or naivete?