Saturday, 4 October 2014

Scientology: The Art of Obfuscating and Marketing

A few weeks ago we received through the letterbox a questionnaire
calling itself the Oxford Capacity Analysis.
It contained well over a hundred questions concerning personality as
well as mental, emotional and behavioural disorders. When I looked carefully at the small print I
noticed that the organisation which had devised this had nothing whatsoever to
do with Oxford University, but had come from the London-based Church of
Scientology. The flyer invited me to
complete the questionnaire, whereupon it would be analysed and the results
presented to me at no charge at its London centre on Queen Victoria Street. So as part of my personal project into
investigating as many places of worship in my area as I can, I thought this was
an opportunity not to be missed. I
filled out the form and within a few days was invited to meet a Scientologist
to discuss my problems – as this is what the Oxford Capacity Analysis
inevitably finds out about participants. She
was a lovely person – very professional and in a centre that seemed like a
cross between a hotel and a mausoleum. I
saw no other human beings in the centre besides my “analyst” and the
receptionist. It was a little
creepy. As a way of introduction I was
given a video to watch from which the only memory I have is a slideshow of all the stunning Scientology Churches around the world – most
photos taken at night and positively glowing.
Then it showed people reading books in what looked like Scientology
libraries. Oh, and there were lots of
smiling faces in the film.

So back to the Oxford Capacity Analysis.It’s set up to look at 10 categories of
emotions & personality traits with a sliding scale between the”desirable
state” and the “undesirable state”.For
example, based on how you answer some of the questions, you’re ranked between stable
and unstable.Okay, is that straight
forward?Here are the other categories:

Happy | Depressed

Composed | Nervous

Certainty | Uncertainty

Active | Inactive

Aggressive | Inhibited

Responsible | Irresponsible

Correct Estimation | Critical

Appreciative | Lack of Accord

Communicative | Withdrawn

So in
presenting my results, it was pretty clear that I had some major issues to deal
with. Now, keep in mind, this is the
primary way that the Church of Scientology has presented itself – its beliefs,
teaching and methods - to me for the first time. The message is:

You’ve
got some serious problems that we’ve uncovered with our “scientifically” developed
analysis.

Don’t you want to free yourself
from these in order to be successful and reach your full potential?

We can help you do this.

Will that be cash or card for your
first course?

I asked the
woman giving me my analysis to tell me what Scientology is about; I wanted to
understand what the philosophical basis of it was. Most religions and philosophies try to answer
these four basic questions: Why are we
here? What’s wrong with us? What can be done about it? And how’s it all going to turn out in the
end? I mean, even atheists can answer
those questions. But she just skirted
around these, repeating over and over that the only way to get to the heart of Scientology
was to practise it immediately – by reading the L Ron Hubbard books and
enrolling in a class. It was as though
the fundamental beliefs of Scientology could not be understood until you were
well and truly neck deep in it. And that
was something I was completely unwilling to do.
This reminded me of some of the practices of New Age Spirituality, like meditation,
yoga, crystals, tarot cards and such. So
many don’t really explain the basis upon which their practices are built, but
rather give the message: you have a
problem; do this; you’ll get enlightenment when you’ve made sufficient progress.

I can also understand tithing to places of worship in order that they
provide for the less fortunate and other worthy causes. But it really wasn’t clear to me why
Scientology considers itself to be a church.
It seemed more like expensive self-help in a tax-free hotel. It’s not that I’m cynical; rather I think people
are actually being duped into believing that ultimate reality is about being a
person with Scientology-determined characteristics and without Scientology-determined
flaws; there really wasn’t much discussion in the area of ethics in those
posh halls. Yes, we all have problems,
some of which can be lessened with psychological counselling. But I strongly urge people not to base their
entire worldview on a “religion” that can’t even reveal what it really believes
in an hour and a half.