Clayton Watson -- Kid Ratings
Ratings are based on Rick's four star system.
One star - the commercials are more entertaining than the viewing.
Two stars - watch if you have nothing better to do.
Three stars - good solid entertainment.
Four stars - you never dreamed viewing could be this good.

"This doesn't make any sense!" cries one character near the end of the final film in The Matrix trilogy. How nice of them to
review their own movie.

It would be a waste of time to point out the many absurdities. Superman's battle with General Zod didn't make a whole lot of
sense either, and it didn't set off any alarms. It wasn't supposed to make sense. The battles in the Matrix are Superman vs. Zod
raised to the nth power, and can be enjoyed on that level.

The movie is too long. I'm going to give away a few plot points, but I don't think you need a SPOILER WARNING, because the plot
is not the point. The plot is a serviceable, standard frame on which to hang the action. After the scene where Mr. Smith takes
over Oracle I lost interest for about a half hour. My mind wandered. My interest returned when the action became less
spectacular and more focused. This character, who I recognize, has to do that, so that that character, who I recognize, can
open the door and let a third character in. In other words, special effects that just splash all over the screen are
boring. Special effects become interesting when you are interested in the characters, when you understand what they are
trying to do, and when you know what obstacles stand in their way.

It doesn't take much to get us interested in a character. We don't need the kind of characterization found, for example, in
Luther, which is playing on the screen next door, or even Luthor, every Wednesday night in Smallville. We just need to know
who we are rooting for. We need to know what he is trying to accomplish. And we need to know what constitutes a win. The
most spectacular battle in the world won't interest us if we don't know which side we are on and what the definition of a win
is. (Gratuitous political aside: That is the problem with Iraq. We don't know what the definition of a win is anymore.)

Silly as the battle suits are (zero protection against shrapnel!) my interest revived and stayed at a fairly high level
throughout the rest of the film. There is one particularly nice moment just prior to the final confrontation.

One advantage the battle between Superman and General Zod had over the battle between Neo and Mr. Smith is that in the real
word, a battle can have consequences. In the Matrix, a battle is an arbitrary string of zeroes and ones.

Why does Neo win? For the same reason Superman wins. Superior will power. Over on the next screen, in Luther, we are
told that everything is predestined, that the human will is illusory. But what a magnificent illusion!

More contrasts occur to me between the story of the founder of Protestantism and the story of the savior of Zion City. First,
while Martin Luther's thought has been simplified and somewhat homogenized for movie audiences, the contrast between the
level of philosophical discourse in the two films highlights just how sophomoric the "philosophy" of the Matrix is. Second,
Luther clearly articulates the dichotomy between salvation by human will and salvation by faith alone. The Matrix tries to
have it both ways. Neo saves the world by both will power and by faith (and by love and the prize in the crackerjack box
and the kitchen sink). By touching all of the great philosophical bases, you don't really touch any of them. Why did Neo
triumph this time after failing the five (or is it six?) previous times. Because he did. That's why.

But the fight scenes kick ass, and we still get a thrill when we hear the words, "Welcome back, Mister Anderson." See
The Matrix Revolutions in a theater where the sound is turned up REAL LOUD!!!!!