The interactions between mortality reductions and income growth are studied, with a special attention at their relationship prior to the Industrial Revolution, when income per head was stagnant. The choice of individual medical spending is modeled, giving a rationale for individual health expenditures even when medicine is not effective in postponing death. The rise of effectivemedicine is then explained by a learning process function of expenditure on health. The rise in effective medicine can then be linked to the economic growth of the eighteenth century through life expectancy increases, and fostering capital accumulation.
The rise of effective medicine has also had an effect on the relation between growth and inequality and on the intergenerational persistence of differences in income. These channels are operative through differential mortality induced by
medical effectiveness that turns out to determine a differential in the propensity to save among income groups.

The interactions between mortality reductions and income growth are studied, with a special attention at their relationship prior to the Industrial Revolution, when income per head was stagnant. The choice of individual medical spending is modeled, giving a rationale for individual health expenditures even when medicine is not effective in postponing death. The rise of effectivemedicine is then explained by a learning process function of expenditure on health. The rise in effective medicine can then be linked to the economic growth of the eighteenth century through life expectancy increases, and fostering capital accumulation.
The rise of effective medicine has also had an effect on the relation between growth and inequality and on the intergenerational persistence of differences in income. These channels are operative through differential mortality induced by
medical effectiveness that turns out to determine a differential in the propensity to save among income groups.