Briggs works at the Healthy Steps program at the Montefiore Comprehensive Health Care Center in the South Bronx, screening children as young as 6 months for mental health issues.

That may sound young, too young maybe, but that’s when some experts believe it’s important to catch the first signs that something may be wrong. Many say waiting until kindergarten is too late.

So Briggs sees a lot of babies at the Healthy Steps program, but the crying doesn’t seem to faze her at all. Visiting with baby and parent, she watches the way they interact.

Does the baby look to the parent for comfort? And does the parent respond?

“If a baby feels safe, a baby will explore, and if a baby explores, a baby will learn,” she says, and that’s the basis for mental health.

At the risk of being seen wearing a tinfoil hat I have to ask: with the current push in social emotional learning (SEL) how does this information intersect, and would parents be encouraged to have their babies and toddlers screened?

And to add, autistic children would show signs of “mental illness” by the criteria these people are testing these children with and autism is “genetically predetermined — biologically based” or “neurologically based,” it is not a mental health disorder. And what about shyness? They say ‘If a baby feels safe, it will explore’? Some kids in any different surrounding, will be hesitant to explore, even with parent nearby, so are shy kids mentally ill too?

This just reeks of the establishment trying to scare parents, and drum up some therapy, drugs and more big brother programming!

E-Mail Address

States Fighting Back

https://app.box.com/s/10nl1409mkaf00zzzuyf

CCSS Opt-Out Form

Follow us on Twitter

Campbell’s Law

"The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor."