God Should Not Have Tested Job.

Given that God rewarded Job in the end, the wager means that everyone else going forward will tie their faith to reward.

A 3-O (omniscient, omnibenevolent, omnipotent) god has no need to test faith.

God should not have tested anyone. Testing is a human attribute born of cynicism. It amounts only to mischief and caprice.

If God demands from people not to test him, he has no right to test people.

God should not intentionally torture his followers to make a point.

God should not make deals with Satan.

We, as humans, are incapable of meaningfully challenging God's decisions.

God used the trials of Job to reveal God more, which, to God, is a higher good than the well-being of Job

Tests of faith are a critical part of how God decides whom to reward.

It was not God who tested Job, it was Satan.

Viewing Job’s hardship as a “test” is a fundamental error. There is no indication in the entire book that Job’s trials were a test of his character. Rather, God allows the Satan to harm Job. This is similar to God permitting evil in the world. Thus the book is really about the problem of evil in the world and a good God allowing it to exist, and using the word “test” is an error.

It is possible that the book of Job is not to be taken literally. It could be a metaphorical story that is meant to instruct and teach wisdom.

God made the wager as a demonstration to Satan in order to influence them, and either redeem Satan by showing them the positive example of Job, or by showing the futility of attempting to oppose God.

Since Job ultimately believes his own life is eternal and not temporal/merely natural, the testing provides him an opportunity to grow through his own weaknesses