Nadal has a job at hand with Federer's return to form.
...and this time, he's not choking.

Rafa might win 1.

__________________
TELLING IT LIKE IT IS:"“Every tennis lover would like, someday, to play like Federer ...But every man wants to BE Rafael Nadal. Which is different.” --PHILIPPE BOUIN, writer; also, a rare, unbiased Frenchman

Comon guys
I mean just imagine what I say
AO: Rafa at his best in Ao (injury free and not tired). In Ao the ball bounce's higher than any hard-court in the world and its slower than the most hard courts. So you see. Rafa is the big favourite in AO. I hope/think that he would meet Roger in the final. But to be honest I want that he meets murray in the final

On contrary to what most of MTFs think AO surface is not that higher bouncing. It stays pretty low on slices and flat shots. High bouncing HC are only IW and Miami.

On contrary to what most of MTFs think AO surface is not that higher bouncing. It stays pretty low on slices and flat shots. High bouncing HC are only IW and Miami.

No. Miami has a medium bounce and there are other tournaments that use high bouncing surfaces. I am sure that there is/are still surface(s) that use Rebound Ace. IIRC, Australian does take slice well and it also has a medium bounce.

So, you agree with 2??
But you disagree with 1?
Federer, if he continues the form he's in, will win Wimbledon
So 1 is realistic

So, that means you're just disagreeing with me because I posted it?
Right, ok
Good thing we cleared that up

I disagree with you because you were posting crap (and because your predictions always fail anyway). Murray will not win 2 Slams next year, just no. And an in-form Federer isn't guaranteed to win Wimbledon, either, as long as Rafa is playing, too.

His ground game is on the decline especially his BH/movement, from 2008.
It will come down to his Serve if he can pick-up cheap points on serve, if he can't he will have to slave-away against mugs to get the W. So he might win 0,even the french is not guaranteed.
If his Serve is Great he can challenge all 4.
Serve is good 2/4 is my guess.

Even if that's true, it doesn't matter. Why? Because the rest of the players have been declining even worse. And there are no serious young players on the rise.

I agree his backhand is worse than in 2008, but forehand and serve are both vastly superior.

Even if that's true, it doesn't matter. Why? Because the rest of the players have been declining even worse. And there are no serious young players on the rise.

I agree his backhand is worse than in 2008, but forehand and serve are both vastly superior.

Murrays game is improving, its more difficult now to attack his second serve than its once was.
The forehand has also improved. In his match against nadull he hit more forehand winners than nadull.
Disagree about the serve it just has more mph on it but realistically his 1 serve percentage will drop.
This will be helpful against most players bar federer.
Fed couldn't return serve to save his life @ Wimbledon 08.Nadull's 1st serve was slower than now but he got more 1st serves in.
Now fed will get "more" looks at his second serve to exploit.