Subscribe to this blog

Follow by Email

Search This Blog

www.egyptraveluxe.com

King Tut suffered 'massive' chest injury, new research reveals

new study shows that Tutankhamun,
Egypt’s famous “boy-king” who died around the age of 18, suffered a
“massive crushing tearing injury to his chest” that likely would have
killed him.
X-rays and CT scans have previously shown that the pharaoh’s heart,
chest wall, the front part of his sternum and adjacent ribs, are
missing. In Ancient Egypt the heart was like the brain and removing it
was something that was not done.
“The heart, considered the seat of reason, emotion, memory and
personality, was the only major organ intentionally left in the body,”
writes Dr. Robert Ritner in the book Ancient Egypt.
The new research was done by Dr. Benson Harer, a medical doctor with
an Egyptology background, who was given access to nearly 1700 CT scan
images of Tut that were taken by a team of Egyptian scientists in 2005. Dr. Zahi Hawass, head of the Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities, gave permission for the work.
“Zahi was very kind he let me get access to the entire database of all the CT scans,” said Dr. Harer.
It has been suggested that tomb robbers, operating sometime between
1925 and 1968, may have stolen the heart and chest bones. The new
research shows that while robbers stole some of Tut’s jewellery they
didn’t take the body parts. Instead they were lost due to a massive
chest injury Tut sustained while he was still alive.
This isn’t the only medical problem Tut had. In 2005 a team of
researchers reported that he had a broken leg and earlier this year an
article in the Journal of the American Medical Association revealed that Tut suffered from malaria, something that may have contributed to his death.

This treasure from Tut's tomb shows him harpooning what is believed to be a hippo. Photo by Sandro Vannini

Harer’s work was published in the journal Bulletin of the Egyptian Museum.
It was also presented last spring at a conference organized by the
American Research Center in Egypt (ARCE). This Thursday Harer was in
Canada, giving his findings at the University of Toronto.
Harer specializes in Obstetrics and Gynecology, but also taught
Egyptology as an adjunct professor at California State University at San
Bernardino, up until his retirement.

1968 - The first X-rays

To understand what happened to Tut’s chest we need to go back to
1968. In that year the first x-rays were done revealing that many of
Tut’s chest bones were missing. They also showed that jewellery, which
had been on King Tut when an autopsy was done in 1925, were also gone.
This means that robbers got to him sometime between those years.
Harer’s research indicates that while Tut’s jewellery was certainly stolen, the chest bones were already long gone.
The CT scans show, in high-resolution, the edge of what is left of
Tut’s rib bones. Dr. Harer said that “the ribs are very neatly cut” and
could not have been chopped off by modern day thieves. “The ribs were
cut by embalmers and not by robbers.”
He added that “if you try to cut through a 3,500 year old bone it is
brittle, before you can saw up through it the pressure on the bone would
crack a vast part and you would have jagged edges of the bone,” he
said.
“These are neatly trimmed and the robbers are not going to take the time to try and do a tidy job.”

King
Tut's mummy, as photographed by Harry Burton, the photographer that for
Howard Carter documented the opening of Tutankhamun's tomb. - Image
copyright the Griffith Institute

More proof that Tut suffered
a major chest injury is found in the technique that Tut’s embalmers
used to take out his intestines, liver and stomach.
In Ancient Egypt those organs were removed after death and put into canopic jars (video: King Tut's canopic shrine and jars introduced).
Harer said that the embalmers used a “transverse incision” which was
cut into Tut and went from his umbilicus (his navel), towards the spine.
They “took out the organs below the diaphragm,” he said. However “they
did not go through the diaphragm to extract the lungs - the chest was
gaping open, they could just lift them out directly.”
Harer says he has never seen another royal mummy cut into this way.
“Tut is the only upscale mummy I know that had a transverse incision.”
Normally, for religious reasons, there would be “a special amulet, an
embalming plate, over the incision that the embalmer made.”
However, in this case, there is none. “Since the body already had a
huge opening – it would be pointless to suture the abdominal incision
and protect,” Harer wrote in his journal article.
Also Tut's arms were crossed at his hips, not at his chest, as would normally be befitting a pharaoh.

Stuffing up Tut

There’s more evidence that Tut's chest, including the skin, had been gouged away while he was still alive.
When the first autopsy on Tut was done in 1925, it revealed that he had been stuffed like a turkey, filled with what Howard Carter called a “mass of linen and resin, now of rock-like hardness.”
Harer says that the CT scans show that this material would have been packed from the chest down.
“The chest was packed first, and as they did so, they pushed the
flaccid diaphragm down – they inverted it,” said Dr. Harer. However the
packing improved the appearance of Tut’s chest, “the packing restored
the normal contour of the chest and then the beaded bib (with Tut’s
jewellery) was placed on top of it.”
When Carter examined the bib he was impressed with how adherent it
was. "It was so adherent that he couldn’t successfully remove it,” said
Harer. Carter didn't hesitate to remove other parts of Tut's body, he
actually hacked off the limbs in order to aid the autopsy.
Harer pointed out that if the bib had been put over Tut's skin
(rather than the packing material) he should have had no trouble with
it. “If that beaded bib had been placed over skin over the clavicle, the
skin would have provided a plane in which the bib could have been
easily removed.”

Chased by Hippos - Watch towards the end of the video, where you'll see a hippo ferociously attacking a boat.

What caused this injury?

One possibility that Dr. Harer ruled out is that of a chariot
accident. “If he fell from a speeding chariot going at top speed you
would have what we call a tumbling injury – he’d go head over heels. He
would break his neck. His back. His arms, legs. It wouldn’t gouge a
chunk out of his chest.”
Instead, at his Toronto lecture, Harer brought up another, more exotic possibility - that Tut was killed by a hippo.
It’s not as far out an idea as it sounds, hippos are aggressive,
quick and territorial animals, and there is an artefact in Tut’s tomb
which appears to show him hunting one of them.
It would also explain why there is no account of Tut’s death since
being killed by a hippo would be a pretty embarrassing way for a pharaoh
to die.
“Hippos kill more people than any other animal, they are the most
lethal animal in Africa (if not) the world,” said Harer. “The victim
suffers massive tearing injury and can actually be cut in half.” Medical
reports indicate that “even though they are running away from the hippo
they typically suffer a frontal wound.”
In Tut’s case, if the hippo charged, his entourage may not have been able to get to him in time. “If he did have a club foot (as a recent medical report suggests) it would make him the slowest person getting out of the way – the easiest person for the hippo to get.”
Tut may not have even been hunting a hippo. “It may have been that he
was fowling in the marsh, just got in the wrong area, and the hippo
attacked him.”
Still, it's tempting to imagine Tut trying to hunt a hippo. Despite
his club foot and malaria, it's enticing to believe that the teenage
pharaoh decided to hunt one of the most dangerous animals in the world.
If his goal was to increase his fame then he succeeded far beyond
expectations, in death becoming the most famous Egyptian ruler who ever
lived.

Get link

Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Google+

Email

Other Apps

Get link

Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Google+

Email

Other Apps

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

But ancient Egyptian quarrymen and stonemasons didn't have these modern tools. How, then, did they quarry and cut such clean lines in their obelisks and other monumental statuary? To find out how ancient Egyptians quarried huge pieces of granite for their obelisks, i traveled to an ancient quarry in Aswan, located 500 miles south of Cairo. This is where the ancient Egyptians found many of the huge granite stones they used for their monuments and statues.

One of the most famous stones left behind is the Unfinished Obelisk, more than twice the size of any known obelisk ever raised. Quarrymen apparently abandoned the obelisk when fractures appeared in its sides. However, the stone, still attached to bedrock, gives important clues to how the ancients quarried granite.

Archeologist Mark Lehner, a key member of nova expedition, crouches in a granite trench that abuts one side of…

Hesire
was a high official who lived during the reign of
Netjerikhet (Dosjer) 2686 BC to 2613 BC
. His tutelary informs us of the many offices he
had held during his life.
Thus he was the 'overseer of the royal scribes', at
the head of the royal administration of Djoser.
His most spectacular title, however, was that of the
'greatest (or chief ?)of physicians and dentists'. It is not
entirely clear whether this title infers that Hesire himself was honored as the greatest of physicians and dentists, or rather that he
was merely responsible for the administration of physicians and
dentists. But whatever the case, the distinction between 'physicians'
and 'dentists' in his tutelary does show a high degree of medical specialization at this early stage of the history of Ancient Egypt..