]]>By: Chyll Willhttp://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/30/news-of-the-day-33008/#comment-157378
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:55:13 +0000http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=12291#comment-157378[18] I’m sure he would have at some point, but Farnsy beat him to all the crazy… >;)
]]>By: Mr. OK Jazz TOKYOhttp://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/30/news-of-the-day-33008/#comment-157377
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:41:10 +0000http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=12291#comment-157377[14] hey, don’t you EVer say anything bad about “Lima Time”! One of my favorite players of all time, I wish he had made a start or two in pinstripes..
]]>By: Diane Firstmanhttp://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/30/news-of-the-day-33008/#comment-157376
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:12:30 +0000http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=12291#comment-157376[7]

]]>By: williamnyy23http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/30/news-of-the-day-33008/#comment-157368
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:25:37 +0000http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=12291#comment-157368[4] Under the current rules, it will decrease the percentage of revenue that the Yankees have to contribute, but because the Yankees will likely take in more revenue (at levels that will likely exceed the debt service), there overall contribution will likely increase.

I would imagine that MLB would not retroactively try to revoke the Yankees ability to deduct stadium expenses from their contribution. If they try, I am sure Randy Levine will have something to say about it.

]]>By: lentnejhttp://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/30/news-of-the-day-33008/#comment-157367
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:25:34 +0000http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=12291#comment-1573674. I remember reading that the expense of the Stadium as measured by MLB will actually lower their revenue sharing burden. This was first brought up when the Cardinals started building a new Busch stadium.
]]>By: MichiganYankeehttp://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/30/news-of-the-day-33008/#comment-157366
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:23:23 +0000http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=12291#comment-157366It appears that some things haven’t changed in Joe Torre’s world. (Thanks to NoMaas for the link.)
]]>By: Diane Firstmanhttp://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/30/news-of-the-day-33008/#comment-157365
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:13:28 +0000http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=12291#comment-157365[5]

Somehow the word “suckers” comes to mind.

]]>By: Horace Clarke Erahttp://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/30/news-of-the-day-33008/#comment-157364
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:55:40 +0000http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=12291#comment-157364[3] Pacifiers may be VERY important this year, yes.
]]>By: PJhttp://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/30/news-of-the-day-33008/#comment-157363
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:25:41 +0000http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=12291#comment-157363Speaking of Tampa and their “revenue stream”, that reminded me to ask this to all you “budget brainiacs” here…

Since the Yankees are building and playing in the new Stadium soon, how does that affect their revenue sharing with only a couple more years left to this current CBA? Since there was so much expense involved, will that eliminate their revenue sharing until the other 29 owners can decide how else they are going to punish the Yankees for being successful? Or does it continue the way it has been?