Breaking News

Busting the myths behind police body cameras

The use of
body worn cameras has increased dramatically over recent years. Some have
described the cameras as invasive whilst others praise them for their ability
to capture exactly what happens in times of police conflict. Here, we take a
look at some of the common myths associated with body worn cameras to see
whether research has confirmed them to be true or false.

Reports into the use of worn cameras has found that this so-called myth is
actually true. Studies found that in cases where a camera was worn, it was
70-80 per cent more likely for the criminal to plead guilty compared to other
cases where a camera was not used. It also meant cases were often resolved
quicker with less paperwork to complete, and therefore, officers were able to
spend more of their time patrolling the streets.

Police officers don’t like wearing cameras

This rumour started when footage of police shootings were caught on body
worn cameras in the US. However, research has shown that officers regularly
show their support for the devices. It also helps that complaint against police
officers decreased by a massive 93% in 2016 partly due to cameras
being worn and are,
therefore, seen as a good thing.

With an evaluation of a Californian police department reporting a 60 per cent
drop in the use of police force, this point has also been shown to be true. The
same study also showed a 90 per cent drop in complaints from residents when
they were aware a camera was being used. Of course, it isn’t just the police
who could benefit from these cameras. Other professions may find that cameras
help in their line of work, and so they may wish to look into getting their
own, such as those available here https://www.pinnacleresponse.com/body-worn-cameras.

Body cameras will always capture any
conflict

Unfortunately, this is not true due to several factors. Placement of the
camera is highly important, and therefore, if it is blocked or not placed
correctly, it may miss valuable footage. It also relies on officers strictly
complying with the relevant police policies in place when it comes to switching
their camera on. Human error could be the reason why encounters are missed
either partially or completely.