Mr. Brown is hoping that Washington will pony up more than $50 billion, but the feds have committed only $3.3 billion so far—and Republicans intend to claw it back if they take the Senate and White House this fall. If that happens, the state won't have enough money to complete its first 130-mile segment in the lightly populated Central Valley, which in any event wouldn't be operable since the state can't afford to electrify the tracks....

What a disaster! Remember a year and a half ago, when Wisconsin elected a new governor who said he'd kill the high-speed rail deal? I was a single-issue voter for Scott Walker then, and that was my issue. Here's a newspaper article from December 2010: "High-speed rail funds scatter to other states... California gets lion's share."

Wisconsin will keep only a fraction of the $810 million it won in federal high-speed rail money.... California is the big winner, with up to $624 million....

[Exiting Democratic Governor Jim] Doyle called the loss of the high-speed rail funds a "tragic moment for the state of Wisconsin. Eight hundred and ten million dollars that would have gone to create thousands of jobs in Wisconsin will now create jobs in other states... I obviously am deeply saddened to see us take a major step backward."

Ha. It's been so not tragic.

"My congratulations to the workers in California and Florida. As a result of this decision, you will have a merry Christmas," Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett said at a news conference. "I'm just sad the same won't happen here in Wisconsin."

Tom Barrett is, of course, the Democratic Party candidate in the recall election against Scott Walker, but back then, he'd just lost the regular election to Walker. The recall election is in 2 weeks. I wonder if he's been asked about these old statements about the damned train and how lucky California was to get that federal cash infusion Scott Walker spurned.

53 comments:

Jerry 'the admitted liar' Brown along with this leftard democrat cohorts in the state assembly and state senate are going to finally sink the state into an abysmal hole it will never be able to climb itself out of and the choo-choo to nowhere of death will be the e-ticket ride that takes it there. These fucking fools have no idea how to run anything. They will torch one of the world's greatest economies into the ground to erect edifices to themselves to highlight their final personal legacies. Everyone of them needs to simply die in a fire for what they have done to this great state. It's over.

It's his version of the ruins British gardeners liked to build in 19th century formal gardens. They were useless but served as a charming reminder of times past for those without the interest to read history. They also served as a demonstration of the power and position of the patron who commissioned them. The train boondoggle in California will function in both capacities even if it never carries a single passenger.

The Lefties wanted to go back to the future with Governor Moonbeam and now they got what they wanted, much as they did with Dictator Zero, Dingy Harry, Pelosi Galore, and the Congress of '08.

For the next hundred years, anytime anybody wants to beat somebody over the head with the folly of their ways, Caliphony and the Obama Years will be used the way the Demos used to use Herbert Hoover, Richard Nixon, and Joe McCarthy.

Governor Moonbeam has finally made that final mental move into Cloud Cuckoo Land. Earlier this week on Charlie Rose he claimed that California could not be counted out--it was still the Wild West where great new things were constantly being invented. Why said Moonbeam look at Facebook--which was invented in California.When Rose gently, and correctly, pointed out that Facebook had been invented in Cambridge Mass by a Harvard student, Moonbeam replied "Well. . . .they're here now!!!!" as though that made up for his stupidity.

Some things you can't fix. This moron didn't know what to do with Linda Ronstadt when he took her on safari to Africa in the 1970's and he's equally frickin' clueless today.

The good thing is that the California voters--who were bamboozled into voting for this high speed rail mess in ~2004 or 2006 or so have had the scales peeled form their eyes--and if they were to vote today, the thing would go down in flames.

A new branch of the light rail system that Los Angeles has built and which does have some logic to it (although it does not go to LAX), opened last month and has no riders. That didn't stop the rail enthusiasts who are put off by nothing, especially economics.

After all, Hollywood is the home of "IF you build it, they will come." That was a movie, of course.

In some places, including Wisconsin, people are waking up. Here in Virginia Beach, the powers to be want a referendum on a 800 million plus light rail line which as always will be way plus. They are also hopeful of other people's money. Fortunately, the firefighters, police, and teachers have all come out in opposition since they know where the money to subsidize and pay deficits will come from. We are a suburban city of 450000 people, but no centralized city center. There are few people who actually live near the route to use it without having to drive to it when it becomes just a hassle. You can hardly take your beach items on a glorified trolley car, so it is even worthless there. Chris Cristie started this awakening by killing a 12 billion tunnel.

Hopefully, they will at least be able to build the stretch from Ogdenville to North Haverbrook. And to save money, as well as the planet, they can install windmills on each train to self-power them as they go along.

Not to worry! Grandpa Moonbeam has it all figured out. Once the carbon trading scheme kicks in, there will be $50-100 billion to fund everything!! High speed rail, Van Jones' schemes, more welfare, everything you ever wanted!

Of course, that assumes all the businesses that will have to pay the tax will stay in CA and remain solvent.

Here in Kentucky we don't have light rail...anywhere. Heck, I just got carpeting put in the bathroom last year. I liked it so well, I'm gonna' run it all the way up to the house. Won't have to mow the lawn anymore too.

It would be cheaper for the state of California to purchase a fleet of 737's than it would be to build this railroad. I really can't see the point of it. A flight from San Jose to Los Angeles costs $178 round trip on United Airlines. Southwest is $10 more. How can "high speed rail" compete with that and stay in business?

I can't even drive it for that amount of money, it costs more in gas for that one way in my SUV.

The problem is not that "trains are so 19th century", although they are. The problem isn't even that the cost estimates have been lowballed while the ridership forecasts have been inflated to the stratosphere, which they have.

The problem with California high speed rail is that the wrong people are building it and paying for it.

The purpose of a high-speed rail corridor from San Francisco to Anaheim is simple; to take vacationing families to Disneyland. Disney also happens to have a lot of experience in building and running trains, and I think Disney should built this one.

The only bullet train that Tom Barrett is concerned about these days is the Cannonball Express to Oblivion that his campaign has become, especially after the Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel's endorsement of Scott Walker.

Put more metermaids on the payroll?? Boy are Calif politicians slow on the uptake! New Orleans politicians are WAY more crafty. In NO metermaids actually work for a pvt company (tho they wear police uniforms--of a sort) and the company gets paid for each ticket issued no matter whether the ticket is paid or not. And the company can reissue the ticket MULTIPLE TIMES (and get paid by the city each time) to known mailing addresses. The advantage to the city? (the city politicians, that is, NOT the taxpayer) The company makes HUGE campaign contributions to the Mayor's re-election campaigns. See how much better it's done in New Orleans?

If California's real purpose is to demonstrate to intelligent voters in other states the extreme moral hazard of voting Democrat, then, as a Californian who is an American first, I can find some silver lining to this assured failure and bankruptcy.

Just don't be surprised though when California comes shaking its tin cup in Washington for the bailout.

I'm thinking federal receivership is probably worth disenfranchising all of us from self-state governance; we're obviously proving we're too damned stupid to do so without adult supervision.

As a native Californian, I always planned to retire to some low cost-of-living, backwater state. The last few decades of CA lawmakers have built up a nice momentum in the "backwater" direction, so I was thinking I could retire in-place, but they seem to be fumbling the ball when it comes to low-cost.Can't have everything, I guess.

Here's an amusing account of how crazy the money-losing economics of commuter rail transport can get in train-crazy Japan, when JR East tried to axe "the least trafficked line in the whole nation." A sign of things to come in California.

Federal receivership is just a start. A state declaring bankruptcy should revert to being federal territory, any officeholder barred for life from holding office anywhere in the US (sure there are federalism concerns, but our crack Supreme Court is pretty good at inventing rationales), and any citizen of the dissolving state barred for life from voting any any election anywhere in the US.