Among the most astonishing things that have
happened in the past few months is the dramatic change in political affiliation
among the citizens of so-called "swing states." Polling released
yesterday by the CBS/New York Times/Quinnipiac College triumvirate indicates
that based on the sample selected to participate in a recent Florida survey,
12 percent of Sunshine state voters have switched their political party
from Republican to Democrat . . . in only three months!

In their poll released on August 1, the surveyors
found that Obama was leading in Florida by six points - 51% to 45% - over
Romney.

The poll's sponsors did not comment on the
dramatic shift in voter sentiment; they left that for us to scratch our
heads about.

Here's voter distribution data as it has
changed in polling over the past four years:

July 2012Democrat: 36%
Republican: 27%
Independent: 32%

May 2012
Democrat: 31%
Republican: 34%
Independent: 29%

November 2010
Democrat: 36%
Republican: 36%
Independent: 29%

November 2008
Democrat: 37%
Republican: 34%
Independent: 29%

It looks to be a classic case of the Democratic
machine intimidating Quinnipiac - normally a reasonably reliable polling
organization - into "walking back" its unfavorable May voter
distribution, in much the same way California Congresswoman Dianne Feinstein
was figuratively bludgeoned behind the scenes into recanting her assertion
that "contemptible" national security leaks had come from the
White House.

It appears that both Quinnipiac and Feinstein
succumbed to offers they couldn't refuse from Obama's Chicago mob.

The crosstabs in the Florida polling are
equally suspect. Among Florida women, Obama enjoys a 51%-44% lead, an
absurd result given the outcome of CBS/New York Times national polling
in May indicating that women favor Romney 46% to 44%. The same May poll
had Romney winning the male vote nationally, while the most recent polling
indicates that Romney is losing men by a 50% to 46% margin in Florida.

Ohio and Pennsylvania polling skews are similarly
suspect. In Ohio the latest survey has eight percent more Democrats polled
than in the 2010 mid-term elections. That's a nine point rise in the Democrat
sample for the Buckeye state. The six point increase in Democratic voters
polled in the latest Pennsylvania survey represents a three-point upward
swing for Dems in that state, very optimistic given the recent downward
spiral of Democratic voter enthusiasm that is being recorded in virtually
every national poll.

The question becomes, "What would the
results have revealed about voter sentiment if the polls hadn't been 'juiced'
to produce yet another lie the Obama campaign needed to get out through
a complicit media to an increasingly skeptical and unmotivated Democratic
cohort?"

The answer is that even given the blatantly
corrupt voter sample in the latest Florida polling, Obama is underperforming
his 2008 polling numbers dramatically. In that year's polling against
John McCain, Obama received about 57% of the combined Democrat/Republican
sample. In this year's polling, he's dropped to 53% of that combined sample.

If a more representative sample of Florida
voters had been polled - say a 36%/36% split between Democrats and Republicans
- Romney would have trounced Obama.

The 36%/27% polling skew means that Obama
got 33% more votes from Democrats and Republicans than he should have
gotten if a truly representative sample had been polled. That translates
to nearly a 21% discrepancy in the total vote. In other words, Romney
would have received a portion of the total sample more than 20% greater
than he did, and that would have resulted in a runaway Romney victory,
with the Republican receiving 54% of the total voters queried in Florida
had the polls not been juiced.

The Obama campaign, widely reported to be
in panic mode at what they know real voter sentiment to be, has to resort
to such blatant and corrupt distortion in order to get their lies about
Obama's chances in the upcoming election out to the public. The problem
is that the public is beginning to see through their tactics.

Comments on Quinnipiac's own website on the
results of the Florida poll bear that out:

"You keep coming here telling us how
Romney is losing Florida, and the numbers don't bear it out. Just shut
the hell up."

It's no wonder that Democrats are terminally
anxious about their presidential candidate's chances. It looks, though,
like juicing the polls isn't having the desired effect. As voters from
both parties are exposed more and more to the lies and distortions emanating
from Democratic campaign headquarters in Chicago, they're coming to realize
that mob rule is not something they can tolerate further. They're seeing
that juicing the polls is but one more dirty tactic Obama campaign director
David Axelrod is pulling out of the hat to disguise the fact that the
campaign is in fact drowning in its own juice.