More than 500 years after being burned at the stake as a heretic,
Dominican Friar Girolamo Savonarola -- preacher of fiery apocalyptic sermons,
de facto ruler of Florence and today a candidate for sainthood -- can still
stir deep passions.

A public tiff in Italy between members of the Dominicans and the
Jesuits over the campaign to canonize Savonarola is the latest proof of his
enduring power to divide.

Despite having called the church of his day a harlot
and a monster of abomination -- and despite charges of having
administered a fundamentalist theocracy in Florence, Italy, analogous to
Afghanistan under the Taliban -- Savonarola seems a serious candidate for a
halo.

Last year Cardinal Silvano Piovanelli of Florence convened a
historical commission in conjunction with the 500th anniversary of
Savonarolas death. Italian media accounts suggest the commission is
likely to issue a positive report, which could clear the way for an
investigation by the Congregation for the Causes of Saints.

This past summer LOsservatore Romano, the official
newspaper of the Vatican, paid tribute to Savonarola. The paper called him
a tireless preacher for moral reform of civil society.

But Savonarola still has influential detractors -- the most
visible of whom happen to be Jesuits, the old rivals of the monks
Dominican order.

An editorial in the 1999 New Year issue of the influential Jesuit
journal La Civiltà Cattolica said that an indiscriminate
revisionist spirit was at work in the effort to rehabilitate the
controversial monk.

He was a contradictory man who inspired opposing
passions, the magazine said. He was capable of deceit. It is
probably impossible to give a definitive opinion about him, the
article concluded -- strongly hinting that the requisite certainty of
Savonarolas holiness could not be found.

Jesuits deceived?

In an interview with an English journalist, Jesuit Fr. Ferdinando
Castelli, a writer for La Civiltà Cattolica, was more direct.
He rebelled against ecclesiastical authority, he said of
Savonarola. We do not believe that he was a religious man worthy of
sanctification, Castelli told Londons Daily Telegraph on
Jan. 7.

Meanwhile the Italian newspaper La Stampa quoted a
Dominican member of the historical commission in Florence on Jan. 2 as saying
that it might be the Jesuits who are deceived.

Savonarola was not a heretic but was burnt for his obstinate
fidelity to the gospel, Fr. Tito Centi said. He stood against the
atrocious agents of Alexander VI, who inflicted every type of persecution on
the friar in order to remove him, even unto death.

The Jesuits have been anti-Savonarola from the foundations
of their order, Centi said, referring to Ignatius of Loyolas
insistence that Savonarolas works be burned. Ignatius saw Savonarola as
an enemy of the papacy.

The work of the historical commission to date has shown that
the old suspicions of the Jesuits are totally unfounded, Centi
told La Stampa. These charges repeated over the centuries can be
discounted, though they are disagreeable because they come from brothers in the
faith.

Centis criticism was echoed by Professor Claudio Leonardi, a
Florentine advocate of Savonarola, who also spoke to the Daily
Telegraph. Whoever wrote the [La Civiltà Cattolica]
article ... has never read the works of Savonarola and was influenced more by
subjective considerations than historic reality, he said.

Such divided opinions reflect the complexities of
Savonarolas life and legacy. From 1494-1498, Savonarolas followers
controlled Florence after they chased out the successor to Lorenzo (de Medici)
the Magnificent. During those four years the city was rocked by running clashes
between the pro- and anti-Savonarola factions.

Savonarola captured hearts as a preacher. His powerful apocalyptic
visions warned that God would soon scour the world and that Florence,
Gods chosen city, had better be ready. Contemporaries speak of the
spellbinding power of these sermons; Savonarolas followers were called
piagnoni, or weepers, because he so often moved them to tears.

As evidence of his powerful charisma, Savonarola managed to
convince the highly humanistic Florentines to surrender their mirrors, dice,
cards, cosmetics and nude paintings and burn them all in the Piazza di Signoria
in a towering bonfire of the vanities. He also demanded repression of
homosexuals. It is these aspects of his reign that have led to comparisons with
the Taliban or to Iran under the ayatollahs.

But Savonarola was also an early democrat, pushing for the
creation of a citizens council that would form city policy.

He was also a friend to the poor. Under Savonarola, the city
created a building society that offered loans at rates well below what was
demanded by Florences private bankers -- 5 to 7 percent, as opposed to
the 32.5 percent that had been standard practice under the de Medicis. One of
the charges that led to Savonarolas downfall was that he impoverished the
city by refusing to ever turn away a beggar.

He also patronized the famous painters of his day. Michelangelo
would later say that when he painted the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, it was
the sermons of Savonarola he heard in his mind.

Savanarola was a fierce critic of ecclesiastical corruption, and
this is perhaps the most contested aspect of his legacy for those proposing to
canonize him. He referred to Alexander VI as a broken tool,
accusing the pope of practicing simony and of dubious personal morality. He
defied the pope by aligning Florence with the French king, Charles, rather than
the Holy Alliance of Italian city-states championed by Alexander.
Toward the end, Savonarola called for a church council that would depose
Alexander.

There was never serious question about Savonarolas doctrine
-- his chief theological work, The Triumph of the Cross, is widely
viewed as orthodox. In 1558, Pope Paul IV -- who had served in the court of
Alexander VI -- said that Savonarola was not a heretic. The question for
examiners today is not doctrinal but disciplinary: whether Savonarola defied
the authority of the pope in impermissible fashion.

In English the name of Savonarola may be synonymous with religious
fanaticism, but many Italians, and Florentines in particular, have a different
image.

In an age of corruption, Savonarola represented honest government,
making him something of a patron for the current Italian drive to break the
grip of cronyism and political patronage that has long dominated their
politics.

In a move laden with symbolism, prosecutor Gherardo Colombo took
part in a ceremony in Florence on May 23, 1998, marking the anniversary of
Savonarolas death. Colombo is a key figure in Italys clean
hands anti-graft campaign.

Popular with reformers

Savonarola also defended rule by the people against the feudal
dynasties and papal politics that for centuries impeded Italian nationalism. As
an ecclesial dissenter, Savonarola is popular among todays Catholics who
believe the church could stand some reform.

There are even those who argue that had the Renaissance papacy
been a bit more open to Savonarolas critique, the church might have been
spared the agony of the Protestant Reformation.

Whatever the case, Savonarolas most ardent supporters seem
unlikely to be discouraged by anything historical research might uncover. He
was a man of faith who loved Jesus Christ, according to Dominican
Fr. Armando Verde in the International Herald Tribune. Savonarola may
have made compromises in the rough-and-tumble of Florentine politics, Verde
said, but on the ethical and spiritual level, absolutely never.