Yes, Ben Bernanke did not suddenly come up with a solution to the unemployment problem. He's a central banker, not a Congressman. His job is to maintain a stable money supply, he cannot provide the kind of fiscal stimulus needed to soak up the excess capacity in the economy and put it to work building infrastructure, Congress has to pass the laws to do that and the President has to actually spend the money that Congress allots for that purpose. But maintaining a stable money supply is no small thing. Without that, we'd be truly fucked, in a deflationary spiral that would not stop until we were back at a barter economy -- which, in case you haven't notice, is woefully inadequate at the task of creating and maintaining a technological civilization.

In short, Ben Bernanke saved civilization. He made some mis-steps here and there, but he's human, not friggin' Jesus Christ incarnate, for cryin' out loud, and the one thing Ben has been is pragmatic -- if something he did was not working, he did something else, exercising powers the Federal Reserve had been granted since 1913 but had never before exercised (a probable cause of the Great Depression, that). Unlike Obama and the Nobel Peace Prize, Ben Bernanke truly is deserving of the Man of the Year award. As for the conspiracy theorists (and Barney Frank): You're full of shit. All that needs sayin', thankyouverymuch.

Jazz, the shit happened on Alan Greenspan 's watch, not Ben's, Ben just got the aftermath. And most of the "shit" happened at non-bank institutions like Countrywide Finance, AIG and Goldman-Sachs, not at Fed-regulated banks -- of the 20 biggest sub-prime lenders, one (1) was regulated by the Fed.

Remember, Ben Bernanke is a *central banker*. He has direct control of the money supply and indirect control of national banks. He has no (zero) control over anything else. It's annoying that both conspiracy theorists who conclude the Fed is part of a conspiracy to defraud Americans via its actions, and Fed bashers who say the Fed should have somehow magically waved a magic wand and made institutions it did not regulate behave, seem to agree on one thing: the Fed is all-powerful, all-knowing, and has infinite capabilities. In reality, the Federal Reserve System is a collection of *banks*, not some all-powerful institution. Bernanke's job is control of the money supply, not creating laws. Bad laws, not bad actions by the Federal Reserve, caused this problem. So blaming Ben is silly.

Hmmm. I was under the distinct impression that much of the shit had occurred post February, 2006. And his prior gig: a member of the board of governors of the Federal Reserve System.

From the Roubini article you linked previously:

Mr. Bernanke, a Fed governor in the early part of this decade, supported flawed policies when Alan Greenspan pushed the federal funds rate (the policy rate set by the Fed as its main tool of monetary policy) too low for too long and failed to monitor mortgage lending properly, thus creating the housing and credit and mortgage bubbles.

He and the Fed made three major mistakes when the subprime mortgage crisis began. First, he kept arguing that the housing recession would bottom out soon (it has not bottomed out even three years later). Second, he argued that the subprime problem was a contained problem when in reality it was a symptom of the biggest leverage and credit bubble in American history. Third, he argued that the collapse in the housing market would not lead to a recession, even though about one-third of jobs created in the latest economic recovery were directly or indirectly related to housing. Mr. Bernanke’s analysis was mistaken in several other important ways. He argued that monetary policy should not be used to control asset bubbles. He attributed the large United States current account deficits to a savings glut in China and emerging markets, understating the role that excessive fiscal deficits and debt accumulation by American households and the financial system played.

So, not only was he complicit in Greenspan's fuck-ups, he has a rather impressive list of his own fuck-ups to complement them.

At that, I'm not actually dissing the guy very much. He's bright, and he's done some good things. But I am saying that too little, too late is not a great track record. And there are other economists would very likely have done better sooner, probably including both Krugman and Roubini.

So, yeah, when his back was to the wall he did what Krugman wanted him to. I'd buy him a beer, but I wouldn't canonize him. Man of the year? Meh!

Cheers!JzB the wants to have a beer with Bernanke at the White House trombonist

Ground rules: Comments that consist solely of insults, fact-free talking points, are off-topic, or simply spam the same argument over and over will be deleted. The penguin is the only one allowed to be an ass here. All viewpoints, however, are welcomed, even if I disagree vehemently with you.

WARNING: You are entitled to create your own arguments, but you are NOT entitled to create your own facts. If you spew scientific denialism, or insist that the sky is purple, or otherwise insist that your made-up universe of pink unicorns and cotton candy trees is "real", well -- expect the banhammer.

Links to Me

Mo Links to Me

Twit

FEEDJIT Live Traffic Map

Sitemeter

FEEDJIT Live Traffic Feed

Copyright 1998-2999

All content on this blog is copyrighted by this penguin and may be used only with attribution upon penalty of being condemned to Hell, Michigan to be flogged for eternity with limp herring by my crack penguin army. You have been warned!