McCain ‘How Do We Beat the Bitch’ Video

“How do we beat the bitch?” a supporter asked Republican presidential hopeful John McCain during an intimate campaign gathering in Hilton Head, South Carolina Monday.

The “bitch” -of course- being Hillary Clinton, the Democratic front-runner.

The question immediately drew laughter, and a noticeable blush from the Arizona Senator.

“May I give the translation?” McCain jokingly asked.

“I thought she was talking about my ex-wife,” someone in the crowd shouted, just as McCain attempted to give a dignified response to the rather undignified question.

McCain responded by telling supporters that a recent poll showed him leading Hillary Clinton in a head-to-head race for president. “I respect Senator Clinton,” McCain said.

Here’s the video:

It’s a very awkward exchange. That a middle aged woman asked it in that way, in mixed company, with cameras rolling, to a United States Senator says quite a bit about the level to which our political discourse has sunk and about the visceral antipathy to Senator Clinton.

As to McCain, he handled it about as well as could reasonably be expected. Greg Sargent chides McCain for calling it “an excellent question.” But McCain calls everything “an excellent question.”

Sargent also wonders why McCain didn’t condemn the remark. Perhaps he should have.

Tactically, it may well have served as a “Sister Souljah moment.” Recall, though, that the original Sister Souljah moment was a planned act, not an off-the-cuff response. (Unlike Bill Clinton’s recent admirable “How dare you” moment.)

It’s asking a bit much to expect McCain to admonish one of his supporters in the midst of a jovial exchange, humiliating her and creating an incredibly awkward situation. Dealing with rude behavior is always awkward, putting people in the position of responding in kind or ignoring it. McCain chose the latter.

But I don’t think “bitch” is a word that can be used in political discourse around a presidential candidate. Imagine if the questioner had asked — referring to Obama — “how do we beat the [n-word]?” He would have immediately voiced his rejection of that word. Laughing and pretending to wipe away sweat and so forth would never have been good enough and he would have known it.

The comparison, however, doesn’t work. That word has long been considered quite toxic and simply isn’t uttered (by white people, anyway) in polite public discussions. Indeed, we’ve euphemized it as “The N word” because saying it is so verboten. “Bitch,” by contrast, has been normalized over the past quarter century so much so that it’s routinely heard on prime time network television. It simply doesn’t have the same connotation. (Althouse’s commenters provide an alternative female-specific epithet that’s more analogous.)

Ideally, McCain would have politely scolded the woman for her phrasing. Most of us, however, routinely experience situations where, after the fact, we realize what we “should have said.” McCain wasn’t prepared for the situation. Then again, I’m not sure it’s reasonable to expect that he would have been.

It also says quite a bit about the level to which McCain has sunk when he responds to the query that it is an “excellent question.”

He’s rather clearly responding to the subject of the question — How to beat Hillary, who’s leading in the polls — rather than its framing. Further, McCain has the tick of most schoolteachers and others who frequently take unscripted questions of always praising the questioner.

James you are a hell of a good apologist. Is that what your doctorate is in?

Interesting to note just how much better Pres. Clinton recently handled a similar situation. Guess thats what they call leadership.
McCain is supposed to be a stand up guy. Guess that does not include demanding at least a basic level of respect for a fellow senator.

Therefore there should be prizes for innovative techniques for Sex with Goats, How to Molest female infants, the theory and practise of honor killing of wives and daughters and the efficient slaughtering of innocent infidels and even fellow Muslims….

“McCain has the tick of most schoolteachers and others who frequently take unscripted questions of always praising the questioner.”

I seriously doubt that any schoolteacher would praise the questioner who used such language. McCain is simply in a position now where he is desparate for votes, so his instincts are to not potentially offend someone who is already a supporter. Kinda sad to watch…

The City of San Francisco has decided to give ID cards to residents including those who are here ILLEGALLY. On Tuesday the Board of Supervisors voted to issue municipal ID cards to residents regardless of their immigration status. As with all these f…

No lofty statements by presidents or leaders of nations this time, but the race is on for the moon, again. From 1961 to 1969 the USSR and the United States were locked in a history-making race to land the first…

But somehow, because the target was Asians or Women, he’s forgiven. And that just stinks.

No, it’s just different. “Gooks” doesn’t have the same baggage as the N-word in our culture, especially in that context. It’s clear McCain was talking about the loathsome slimeballs who tortured him, using the language that was popular among servicemen at the time, and not casting aspersions on Southeast Asians as a whole.

“Bitch,” likewise, doesn’t carry the same weight. There’s another epithet, beginning with the next letter in the alphabet, which comes close but wasn’t used here.

Do you really think McCain hates Asians and women? Otherwise, I’m not sure what the point is.