Want my lawyer's name, post your address...HAPPY TO SEND IT, dipshit.Sure, whatever you NEED to tell yourself.Too EZ, this denier is PURE UNADULTERATED LIAR !!!SADLY, MY PROOF IS YOUR QUOTED WORDS.....back up your claim that the tornado yesterday was due to man made co2..."MAGICALLY GETS DENIER WHIPPED TO..."yes, you implied that weather events have something to do with..."MAGICALLY GETS DENIER WHIPPED TO"....you didn't say the exact words.....but you would've..."Due to = implied = would have???You're not smart implies you're dumb and according to your "words", I caused your stupidity. It's due to me POINTING IT OUT ???Yeah, just make it up as you go, then ask for proof, from anyone else...

LOL!!!All these words and you say nothing.Why waste co2 so needlessly, son?Reality sure seems to be your kryptonite! Lol

Truth is that "rising greenhouse gas emissions must result in more warming - "That carbon dioxide warms the climate is not in doubt."

So if there's more carbon dioxide, and the warming isn't staying in the atmosphere, where is it going?

Surface temperature is only a small (but important) part of the climate system. In fact, most of the extra heat the planet absorbs goes into the oceans, climate scientist at the University of Reading Dr Richard Allan tells us:

"The vast ocean has a huge capacity to store heat To balance the books you need to be measuring the energy coming in at the top of the atmosphere and all the places where it's going to really understand how the climate is heating."

<quoted text>Lying is unacceptable:Truth is that "rising greenhouse gas emissions must result in more warming - "That carbon dioxide warms the climate is not in doubt."So if there's more carbon dioxide, and the warming isn't staying in the atmosphere, where is it going?Surface temperature is only a small (but important) part of the climate system. In fact, most of the extra heat the planet absorbs goes into the oceans, climate scientist at the University of Reading Dr Richard Allan tells us:"The vast ocean has a huge capacity to store heat To balance the books you need to be measuring the energy coming in at the top of the atmosphere and all the places where it's going to really understand how the climate is heating."http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2013/05/doubl...Get a hold of the truth.

if lying is unacceptable why do you seem to enjoy it so much. Claiming ignorance is not a defense for you, btw.

<quoted text>Psst .. I said lying is unaceptable.You are the one who seems to enjoy lies and ignorance. Did you read the reference?Oh it is apparent you don't understand any physics, though. You engage in empty arguments with pure strangers. It must be the loneliness of being a science denier.

On May 15, the peer-reviewed paper, Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature was published in the scientific journal, Environmental Research Letters (ERL). The paper presents The Consensus Project (TCP) a survey of over 12,000 peer-reviewed climate science papers by our volunteer, citizen science team at Skeptical Science. The analysis found a 97% consensus among papers taking a position on the cause of global warming in the peer-reviewed literature that humans are responsible.

Since its online publication, Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature has been downloaded more times than any other paper in ERL history, over 54,000 times.

I like facts.... the facts we have so far, is you're a market loser, a liar for misquoting, and a denier without a clue...Really SUCKS TO BE you.....I'd point out you're UN-original and moronic, but that's like saying you're a POS... Unnecessary & taken for granted.

Some myths pushed by the anti-science crowd are so laughably backwards that repeating them should be grounds for expulsion from homo sapiens. And so it is with the doubly wrong claim that progressives are now using the term climate change because the planet has supposedly stopped warming.

Of course, it hasnt actually stopped warming (see Global Warming Has Accelerated In Past 15 Years, New Study Of Oceans Confirms).

But since the deniers make up stuff about the science, why shouldnt they make up stuff about everything else?

Indeed, it is conservatives who typically change the names of things, as in refusing to say Democratic but only Democrat and insisting on death tax rather than estate tax, even though only big estates are taxed, not death.

That latter switch was championed by the GOPs spinmaster, Frank Luntz, who, as it turns out, also championed switching from global warming to climate change in 2003. Scientists, environmentalists, progressives, and frankly the whole darn planet have always used both terms  hence the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, established in 1988.

<quoted text>Psst .. I said lying is unaceptable.You are the one who seems to enjoy lies and ignorance. Did you read the reference?Oh it is apparent you don't understand any physics, though. You engage in empty arguments with pure strangers. It must be the loneliness of being a science denier.

if you're going to claim someone's post is "unaceptable"......l earn how to spell the word, hack!!! i know how 'your crowd' is so picky about shyt like that!! so, try to maintain face!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.