Monday, November 2, 2015

U.S. Gov’t Semantics To Aid In Deploying Ground Troops To Syria

Scrambling to protect the terrorists it has funded, armed, trained, and directed
for several years against the secular government of Bashar al-Assad,
the United States is now openly considering the option of ground troops
in Syria. Of course, the term “ground troops” is not being used in
general discussion. Instead, “enablers” is the semantical redirection of
choice.
Ground troops – sorry, “enablers” – have been active in Syria for some time
in the form of Special Forces soldiers taking place in direct combat
support missions for terrorist actors as well as in logistical
organization and spotting maneuvers. The new discussion, however, is
surrounding the open deployment of “ground troops” to Syria under the
guise of “fighting ISIS.” In reality, of course, those troops will be
stationed in Syria to support ISIS and the
alleged-but-never-proven-in-the-slightest-to-be-moderate “rebels” who
are also raping and beheading their way across Syria in exactly the same
fashion as ISIS.
These troops will be a further step in the direction of direct US
military involvement in Syria of the open war variety. These troops will
also be sitting ducks and potential “collateral damage” from Russian
airstrikes actually aimed at ISIS/jihadist fighters and a potential
spark for the powder keg of propaganda that would be launched in the
event of Russia “killing our troops.”***Read full article here***