A few weeks ago, there was a story appearing in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution about cyber criminals being able to penetrate the computer system of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. and steal the names, Social Security numbers, drivers’ license numbers, dates of birth, and marital statuses of more than 28 000 policy and non-policy holders residing in Georgia. The article went on to say that the data breach affected other states such as California, but that Nationwide refused “to say how many clients elsewhere have been affected and in how many other states.”

No wonder.

Last week, when the California Department of Insurance announced that it was launching an investigation into the Nationwide breach, it also disclosed that the total number of persons affected by the breach numbered 1 million along with noting that residents of all 50 states were affected (about 5 000 in California). After some prodding from the press, Nationwide confirmed the total number as being closer to 1.1 million. There have a scattering of mostly local news reports on the data breach in other states such as Iowa (90 000 affected), Ohio (29 050 affected) and South Carolina (12 500 affected), but that is about it. Nationwide must be breathing a sigh of relief at how sparsely the national press has covered such a massive breach.

According to a Nationwide account on its website, it took nearly a month for the company to be able to confirm what information was stolen. By all appearances, it says, the attack looked to be the work of cyber criminals from outside the United States, and per usual, the FBI is investigating. Also per usual, Nationwide is offering free-credit monitoring and identity theft protection for a year.

The insurance company also said, “We are very sorry for this situation and are committed to enhancing our defenses against these kinds of attacks.” But those enhancements don't come with any guarantee that this won’t happen again. “There is no such thing as perfect security," the company continued. "And no computer network can ever be completely safe against a sophisticated attack such as occurred here.”

It is a bit hard to tell how sophisticated the attack was, given that Nationwide won't discuss any details. However, if the company truly believed that a data breach was really just a matter of time, maybe it should have encrypted its policy holders’ and non-policy holders’ personal information so that the consequences of any such inevitable successful attack might have been significantly lessened. Maybe California's Department of Insurance can ask why Nationwide why its client data wasn't encrypted.

The total cost likely to be incurred by South Carolina for the breach is expected to hit nearly $30 million when all is said and done, a thousand times more than that dual password system. Nationwide, do you have any interest in a three-orders-of-magnitude savings that also might prevent your next breach?