The judgment was set, and the books were opened.דִּינָא יְתִב, וְסִפְרִין פְּתִיחוּThe judgment was set, and the books were opened. דִּינָא יְתִב, וְסִפְרִין פְּתִיחוThe judgment was set, and the books were opened. דִּינָא יְתִב, וְסִפְרִין פְּתִיחוּ The judgment was set, and the books were opened. דִּינָא יְתִב, וְסִפְרִין פְּתִיחו The judgment was set, and the books were opened. דִּינָא יְתִב, וְסִפְרִין פְּתִיחוּ The judgment was set, and the books were opened. דִּינָא יְתִב, וְסִפְרִין פְּתִיחוּThe judgment was set, and the books were opened. דִּינָא יְתִב, וְסִפְרִין פְּתִיחוּ The judgment was set, and the books were opened. דִּינָא יְתִב, וְסִפְרִין פְּתִיחוּ

Daniel’s Dream חלום דניאלא בִּשְׁנַת חֲדָה, לְבֵלְאשַׁצַּר מֶלֶךְ בָּבֶל, דָּנִיֵּאל חֵלֶם חֲזָה, וְחֶזְוֵי רֵאשֵׁהּ עַל-מִשְׁכְּבֵהּ; בֵּאדַיִן חֶלְמָא כְתַב, רֵאשׁ מִלִּין אֲמַר. 1 In the first year of Belshazzar king of Babylon Daniel had a dream and visions of his head upon his bed; then he wrote the dream and told the sum of the matters.ב עָנֵה דָנִיֵּאל וְאָמַר, חָזֵה הֲוֵית בְּחֶזְוִי עִם-לֵילְיָא; וַאֲרוּ, אַרְבַּע רוּחֵי שְׁמַיָּא, מְגִיחָן, לְיַמָּא רַבָּא. 2 Daniel spoke and said: I saw in my vision by night, and, behold, the four winds of the heaven broke forth upon the great sea.ג וְאַרְבַּע חֵיוָן רַבְרְבָן, סָלְקָן מִן-יַמָּא, שָׁנְיָן, דָּא מִן-דָּא. 3 And four great beasts came up from the sea, diverse one from another.ד קַדְמָיְתָא כְאַרְיֵה, וְגַפִּין דִּי-נְשַׁר לַהּ; חָזֵה הֲוֵית עַד דִּי-מְּרִיטוּ גפיה (גַפַּהּ) וּנְטִילַת מִן-אַרְעָא, וְעַל-רַגְלַיִן כֶּאֱנָשׁ הֳקִימַת, וּלְבַב אֱנָשׁ, יְהִיב לַהּ. 4 The first was like a lion, and had eagle's wings; I beheld till the wings thereof were plucked off, and it was lifted up from the earth, and made stand upon two feet as a man, and a man's heart was given to it.ה וַאֲרוּ חֵיוָה אָחֳרִי תִנְיָנָה דָּמְיָה לְדֹב, וְלִשְׂטַר-חַד הֳקִמַת, וּתְלָת עִלְעִין בְּפֻמַּהּ, בֵּין שניה (שִׁנַּהּ); וְכֵן אָמְרִין לַהּ, קוּמִי אֲכֻלִי בְּשַׂר שַׂגִּיא. 5 And behold another beast, a second, like to a bear, and it raised up itself on one side, and it had three ribs in its mouth between its teeth; and it was said thus unto it: 'Arise, devour much flesh.'ו בָּאתַר דְּנָה חָזֵה הֲוֵית, וַאֲרוּ אָחֳרִי כִּנְמַר, וְלַהּ גַּפִּין אַרְבַּע דִּי-עוֹף, עַל-גביה (גַּבַּהּ); וְאַרְבְּעָה רֵאשִׁין לְחֵיוְתָא, וְשָׁלְטָן יְהִיב לַהּ. 6 After this I beheld, and lo another, like a leopard, which had upon the sides of it four wings of a fowl; the beast had also four heads; and dominion was given to it.ז בָּאתַר דְּנָה חָזֵה הֲוֵית בְּחֶזְוֵי לֵילְיָא, וַאֲרוּ חֵיוָה רביעיה (רְבִיעָאָה) דְּחִילָה וְאֵימְתָנִי וְתַקִּיפָא יַתִּירָה וְשִׁנַּיִן דִּי-פַרְזֶל לַהּ רַבְרְבָן, אָכְלָה וּמַדֱּקָה, וּשְׁאָרָא ברגליה (בְּרַגְלַהּ) רָפְסָה; וְהִיא מְשַׁנְּיָה, מִן-כָּל-חֵיוָתָא דִּי קדמיה (קָדָמַהּ), וְקַרְנַיִן עֲשַׂר, לַהּ. 7 After this I saw in the night visions, and behold a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and strong exceedingly; and it had great iron teeth; it devoured and broke in pieces, and stamped the residue with its feet; and it was diverse from all the beasts that were before it; and it had ten horns.ח מִשְׂתַּכַּל הֲוֵית בְּקַרְנַיָּא, וַאֲלוּ קֶרֶן אָחֳרִי זְעֵירָה סִלְקָת ביניהון (בֵּינֵיהֵן), וּתְלָת מִן-קַרְנַיָּא קַדְמָיָתָא, אתעקרו (אֶתְעֲקַרָה) מִן-קדמיה (קֳדָמַהּ); וַאֲלוּ עַיְנִין כְּעַיְנֵי אֲנָשָׁא, בְּקַרְנָא-דָא, וּפֻם, מְמַלִּל רַבְרְבָן. 8 I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another horn, a little one, before which three of the first horns were plucked up by the roots; and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of a man, and a mouth speaking great things.ט חָזֵה הֲוֵית, עַד דִּי כָרְסָוָן רְמִיו, וְעַתִּיק יוֹמִין, יְתִב; לְבוּשֵׁהּ כִּתְלַג חִוָּר, וּשְׂעַר רֵאשֵׁהּ כַּעֲמַר נְקֵא, כָּרְסְיֵהּ שְׁבִבִין דִּי-נוּר, גַּלְגִּלּוֹהִי נוּר דָּלִק. 9 I beheld till thrones were placed, and one that was ancient of days did sit: his raiment was as white snow, and the hair of his head like pure wool; his throne was fiery flames, and the wheels thereof burning fire.י נְהַר דִּי-נוּר, נָגֵד וְנָפֵק מִן-קֳדָמוֹהִי, אֶלֶף אלפים (אַלְפִין) יְשַׁמְּשׁוּנֵּהּ, וְרִבּוֹ רבון (רִבְבָן) קָדָמוֹהִי יְקוּמוּן; דִּינָא יְתִב, וְסִפְרִין פְּתִיחוּ. 10 A fiery stream issued and came forth from before him; thousand thousands ministered unto him, and ten thousand times ten thousand stood before him; the judgment was set, and the books were opened.יא חָזֵה הֲוֵית--בֵּאדַיִן מִן-קָל מִלַּיָּא רַבְרְבָתָא, דִּי קַרְנָא מְמַלֱּלָה; חָזֵה הֲוֵית עַד דִּי קְטִילַת חֵיוְתָא, וְהוּבַד גִּשְׁמַהּ, וִיהִיבַת, לִיקֵדַת אֶשָּׁא. 11 I beheld at that time because of the voice of the great words which the horn spoke, I beheld even till the beast was slain, and its body destroyed, and it was given to be burned with fire.יב וּשְׁאָר, חֵיוָתָא, הֶעְדִּיו, שָׁלְטָנְהוֹן; וְאַרְכָה בְחַיִּין יְהִיבַת לְהוֹן, עַד-זְמַן וְעִדָּן. 12 And as for the rest of the beasts, their dominion was taken away; yet their lives were prolonged for a season and a time.יג חָזֵה הֲוֵית, בְּחֶזְוֵי לֵילְיָא, וַאֲרוּ עִם-עֲנָנֵי שְׁמַיָּא, כְּבַר אֱנָשׁ אָתֵה הֲוָא; וְעַד-עַתִּיק יוֹמַיָּא מְטָה, וּקְדָמוֹהִי הַקְרְבוּהִי. 13 I saw in the night visions, and, behold, there came with the clouds of heaven one like unto a son of man, and he came even to the Ancient of days, and he was brought near before Him.יד וְלֵהּ יְהִב שָׁלְטָן, וִיקָר וּמַלְכוּ, וְכֹל עַמְמַיָּא אֻמַּיָּא וְלִשָּׁנַיָּא, לֵהּ יִפְלְחוּן; שָׁלְטָנֵהּ שָׁלְטָן עָלַם, דִּי-לָא יֶעְדֵּה, וּמַלְכוּתֵהּ, דִּי-לָא תִתְחַבַּל. {פ} 14 And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all the peoples, nations, and languages should serve him; his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed. {P}טו אֶתְכְּרִיַּת רוּחִי אֲנָה דָנִיֵּאל, בְּגוֹ נִדְנֶה; וְחֶזְוֵי רֵאשִׁי, יְבַהֲלֻנַּנִי. 15 As for me Daniel, my spirit was pained in the midst of my body, and the visions of my head affrighted me.טז קִרְבֵת, עַל-חַד מִן-קָאֲמַיָּא, וְיַצִּיבָא אֶבְעֵא-מִנֵּהּ, עַל-כָּל-דְּנָה; וַאֲמַר-לִי, וּפְשַׁר מִלַּיָּא יְהוֹדְעִנַּנִי. 16 I came near unto one of them that stood by, and asked him the truth concerning all this. So he told me, and made me know the interpretation of the things:יז אִלֵּין חֵיוָתָא רַבְרְבָתָא, דִּי אִנִּין אַרְבַּע--אַרְבְּעָה מַלְכִין, יְקוּמוּן מִן-אַרְעָא. 17 'These great beasts, which are four, are four kings, that shall arise out of the earth.יח וִיקַבְּלוּן, מַלְכוּתָא, קַדִּישֵׁי, עֶלְיוֹנִין; וְיַחְסְנוּן מַלְכוּתָא עַד-עָלְמָא, וְעַד עָלַם עָלְמַיָּא. 18 But the saints of the Most High shall receive the kingdom, and possess the kingdom for ever, even for ever and ever.'יט אֱדַיִן, צְבִית לְיַצָּבָא עַל-חֵיוְתָא רְבִיעָיְתָא, דִּי-הֲוָת שָׁנְיָה, מִן-כלהון (כָּלְּהֵן): דְּחִילָה יַתִּירָה, שניה (שִׁנַּהּ) דִּי-פַרְזֶל וטפריה (וְטִפְרַהּ) דִּי-נְחָשׁ, אָכְלָה מַדְּקָה, וּשְׁאָרָא ברגליה (בְּרַגְלַהּ) רָפְסָה. 19 Then I desired to know the truth concerning the fourth beast, which was diverse from all of them, exceeding terrible, whose teeth were of iron, and its nails of brass; which devoured, brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with its feet;כ וְעַל-קַרְנַיָּא עֲשַׂר, דִּי בְרֵאשַׁהּ, וְאָחֳרִי דִּי סִלְקַת, ונפלו (וּנְפַלָה) מִן-קדמיה (קֳדָמַהּ) תְּלָת; וְקַרְנָא דִכֵּן וְעַיְנִין לַהּ, וּפֻם מְמַלִּל רַבְרְבָן, וְחֶזְוַהּ, רַב מִן-חַבְרָתַהּ. 20 and concerning the ten horns that were on its head, and the other horn which came up, and before which three fell; even that horn that had eyes, and a mouth that spoke great things, whose appearance was greater than that of its fellows.כא חָזֵה הֲוֵית--וְקַרְנָא דִכֵּן, עָבְדָא קְרָב עִם-קַדִּישִׁין; וְיָכְלָה, לְהֹן. 21 I beheld, and the same horn made war with the saints, and prevailed against them;כב עַד דִּי-אֲתָה, עַתִּיק יוֹמַיָּא, וְדִינָא יְהִב, לְקַדִּישֵׁי עֶלְיוֹנִין; וְזִמְנָא מְטָה, וּמַלְכוּתָא הֶחֱסִנוּ קַדִּישִׁין. 22 until the Ancient of days came, and judgment was given for the saints of the Most High; and the time came, and the saints possessed the kingdom.כג כֵּן, אֲמַר, חֵיוְתָא רְבִיעָיְתָא, מַלְכוּ רביעיה (רְבִיעָאָה) תֶּהֱוֵא בְאַרְעָא דִּי תִשְׁנֵא מִן-כָּל-מַלְכְוָתָא; וְתֵאכֻל, כָּל-אַרְעָא, וּתְדוּשִׁנַּהּ, וְתַדְּקִנַּהּ. 23 Thus he said: 'The fourth beast shall be a fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all the kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.כד וְקַרְנַיָּא עֲשַׂר--מִנַּהּ מַלְכוּתָא, עַשְׂרָה מַלְכִין יְקֻמוּן; וְאָחֳרָן יְקוּם אַחֲרֵיהֹן, וְהוּא יִשְׁנֵא מִן-קַדְמָיֵא, וּתְלָתָה מַלְכִין, יְהַשְׁפִּל. 24 And as for the ten horns, out of this kingdom shall ten kings arise; and another shall arise after them; and he shall be diverse from the former, and he shall put down three kings.כה וּמִלִּין, לְצַד עליא (עִלָּאָה) יְמַלִּל, וּלְקַדִּישֵׁי עֶלְיוֹנִין, יְבַלֵּא; וְיִסְבַּר, לְהַשְׁנָיָה זִמְנִין וְדָת, וְיִתְיַהֲבוּן בִּידֵהּ, עַד-עִדָּן וְעִדָּנִין וּפְלַג עִדָּן. 25 And he shall speak words against the Most High, and shall wear out the saints of the Most High; and he shall think to change the seasons and the law; and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and half a time.כו וְדִינָא, יִתִּב; וְשָׁלְטָנֵהּ יְהַעְדּוֹן, לְהַשְׁמָדָה וּלְהוֹבָדָה עַד-סוֹפָא. 26 But the judgment shall sit, and his dominions shall be taken away, to be consumed and to be destroy unto the end.כז וּמַלְכוּתָא וְשָׁלְטָנָא וּרְבוּתָא, דִּי מַלְכְוָת תְּחוֹת כָּל-שְׁמַיָּא, יְהִיבַת, לְעַם קַדִּישֵׁי עֶלְיוֹנִין; מַלְכוּתֵהּ, מַלְכוּת עָלַם, וְכֹל שָׁלְטָנַיָּא, לֵהּ יִפְלְחוּן וְיִשְׁתַּמְּעוּן. 27 And the kingdom and the dominion, and the greatness of the kingdoms under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the Most High; their kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey them.'כח עַד-כָּה, סוֹפָא דִי-מִלְּתָא; אֲנָה דָנִיֵּאל שַׂגִּיא רַעְיוֹנַי יְבַהֲלֻנַּנִי, וְזִיוַי יִשְׁתַּנּוֹן עֲלַי, וּמִלְּתָא, בְּלִבִּי נִטְרֵת. [פ] 28 Here is the end of the matter. As for me Daniel, my thoughts much affrighted me, and my countenance was changed in me; but I kept the matter in my heart. [P]

but I kept the matter in my heart. but I kept the matter in my heart. but I kept the matter in my heart. but I kept the matter in my heart. but I kept the matter in my heart. but I kept the matter in my heart. but I kept the matter in my heart. but I kept the matter in my heart. but I kept the matter in my heart. but I kept the matter in my heart. but I kept the matter in my heart. but I kept the matter in my heart. but I kept the matter in my heart. but I kept the matter in my heart. but I kept the matter in my heart. but I kept the matter in my heart.

"an immediate investigation should be instituted in an effort to ascertain the circumstances behind any fraud being committed..."

The two grant deeds (copied here under July 3, 2008 below) were submitted for review by a veteran FBI agent, decorated by Congress and by then U.S. Attorney General Ashcroft for his achievements.

His opinion letter included the following:

"As background information concerning his FBI career, it should be noted Mr. X received the FBI Director's Award for a much publicized investigation in California that concerned several members of the California State Legislature prosecuted for taking "bribes" with his accomplishments later cited in the U.S. Congressional Record."

...

"With respect to Grant Deed #1 dated December 7, 2007, Mr. X opines reviewing the document he found DAVID J. PASTERNAK scribbled his name in the wrong location, i.e. where the notary is required to witness the document and further failed to sign in his capacity as receiver/grantor. Additionally, and most importantly the Notary Public did not witness and attach a court document identifying/appointing Attorney DAVID J. PASTERNAK. as an authorized court receiver for JOSEPH ZERNIK.

With respect Grant Deed #2 dated December 17, 2007, Mr. X opines reviewing the document the Notary Public did not witness and failed to attach a document identifying/appointing Attorney DAVID J. PASTERNAK as an authorized court receiver for JOSEPH ZERNIK. Additionally, the notation, "DAVID PASTERNAK for JOSEPH V. ZERNIK pursuant to case number SC087400," is not a valid substitute for an authorized court order.

Accordingly, based on above observations MR. X opines an immediate investigation should be instituted in an effort to ascertain the circumstances behind any fraud being committed so that appropriate local, state, and federal authorities can be notified, including the appropriate court."

Monday, July 28, 2008

NOTICE TO THE COURT OF DEFENDANT THE HONORABLE TERRY FRIEDMAN, JUDGE, AND PARTIES IN SAMAAN V ZERNIK (SC087400) TO CEASE AND DESIST RACKETEERINGFiled in U.S. District Court in support of Plaintiff’s 1. Opposition to motions to dismiss, and 2. Requests for reconsideration of: a) Request for TRO and/or OSC denied 3/21/08 b) Request to compel LASC to allow access to books of court, particularly – Book of Judgment

Date: July 28, 2008TO THE COURT, TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

Please take notice of Plaintiff’sNOTICE TO CEASE AND DESIST RACKETEERING, FILED WITH THE COURT OF DEFENDANT THE HONORABLE TERRY FRIEDMAN, AND PARTIES IN SAMAAN V ZERNIK (SC087400).

A. Purpose of this Notice 1. This Notice to Cease and Desist is served by email today, July 28, 2008, on parties in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400), matter heard in LASC, in the hope that they finally cease racketeering.2. This notice is also faxed to the Office of Presiding Judge Czuleger, in support of a request that he finally take control of this matter, stop the vigilante hearings by Judge Friedman, and have this case heard by a judge who is duly assigned, as required by law.

3. This notice is also served today by email, July 28, 2008, with appropriate face page on parties in Zernik v Connor et al (2:2008cv01550) matter heard in U.S. District Court, LA, in support of Plaintiff Zernik’s opposition to motions to dismiss complaint. This notice presents “a set of facts that could be proved consistent with the allegations” as per Hishon v. King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 73:"A complaint must be sustained, and cannot be dismissed, if relief can be granted under any set of facts that could be proved consistent with the allegations. Nothing more than the complaint's allegations are needed to confer standing at this stage."

4. This notice is also filed and served in Zernik v Connor et al in support of Zernik’s ex parte request for reconsideration of the March 21, 2008 Minute Order that denied Temporary Restraining Order and/or Order to Show Cause against Defendant Friedman.

5. This notice is also faxed to members of the House and Senate Committees on the Judiciary, to keep them posted in this matter, involving allegations of well-established, wide-spread corruption and racketeering in the largest Superior Court in the U.S., and congressmen/congresswomen representing Los Angeles County, in hope that they take action to bring LA County back into the fold of the U.S. Constitution, and act to compel the LA Superior Court to allow access to Books of Court, as required by law – in and of itself a substantial reform in the courts of LA.///B. Request for Leniency as Pro SeIn filing this paper Plaintiff Zernik requests special leniency as a pro se litigant - for his "inartful pleading" Erickson v Pardus, 2007. In particular, Zernik is not qualified in assessing the validity of legal theories. Zernik asks that the U.S. District Court ignore any irrelevant or erroneous legal theory claimed herein, and do take into consideration the claims themselves, if they can support some other valid theory, as per Haddoc 1985.///C. The Enterprise at the LASC By now it is evident that –

1. West District of LASC is a renegade court – running in parallel two litigation tracks – i) the LASC Track per se, and ii) the Enterprise Track.

2. Past and present Supervising Judges, Assistant Supervising Judge, and Judges jointly engaged in operating the Enterprise Track at the LASC West District.

3. The LASC has denied access to public records that are the Books of Court, possibly as far back as 25-30 years, out of compliance and in violation of the law: U.S. Constitution, First Amendment, Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589 (1978), California Constitution, Article 1, §3(b)(1),California Public Record Act – California Government Code, § 6250-6270.

4. Hiding the Books of Court is essential for the Enterprise. Review of the Index of All Cases, Calendar of the Court, Registers of Actions, and Book of Judgments is essential for estimating the scope and age of the Enterprise, and the identity of the judges who are active as part of it in the various courts of LASC.

5. The enterprise is enabled through Sustain – the fraudulent case management system introduced 25-30 years ago, without any public oversight, out of compliance and in violation of the law: Rule Making Enabling Act 28 U.S.C. §§ 2071 – 2077.

6. In parallel - the LASC fraudulently established an oral rule of court: “Sustain is privileged – for the Court only”. This rule was articulated to Plaintiff Zernik by both Defendant the Honorable Supervising Judge Rosenberg and the office of Presiding Judge Czuleger. Such oral rule of court is out of compliance and in violation of the law: Rule Making Enabling Act 28 U.S.C. §§ 2071 – 2077, California Rules of Court, Rule 2.500 et seq.

7. Some of Sustain features provide evidence that the system was designed from the start as a fraudulent case management system. Other features demonstrate divergence and drift of the system in the various court houses, and failure to maintain the integrity of the code over the decades, in a manner that is contrary to any reasonable good management practices.

8. Judges of the LASC listed here as Defendants routinely engage in secret rulings and/or reversal of their open court rulings in the electronic court file in Sustain, with no notice or service to parties to the litigation, out of compliance and in violation of the law.

9. Review of Sustain data also reveals that the LASC does not practice any docketing quality assurance whatsoever, in a manner that is contrary to any reasonable good management practices.

10. The custom of entering Minute Orders in court file without service and notice to parties, wide-spread at the LASC, is also essential for the Enterprise. Such practice is out of compliance and in violation of the law: California Rules of Court, Rule 1.20 et seq.

11. Ambiguation of the nature and location of the Book of Judgments (“or equivalent”) as well as ambiguation of the nature of Notice of Entry of Judgment were also critical for the Enterprise. The latter was largely achieved over a couple of decades of review courts decisions. The former is practiced out of compliance and in violation of the law.

12. Combined, the Enterprise generates multiple litigation realities – i) in open court, ii) in paper court file, iii) in secret Sustain records. Such multiplicity of litigation realities is out of compliance and in violation of any concept of Due Process, as guaranteed by the 1st, 5th, and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

13. Review of the Books of Court is likely to demonstrate the real estate fraud is the specialty of the Enterprise. Plaintiff identified at least two cases involving real estate in addition to Samaan v Zernik, where there is evidence of racketeering.

14. The Enterprise reflects wide-spread public corruption that is well established in the largest Superior Court in the U.S.

15. Judges of the Superior Court vary largely in their understanding of the machination of the Enterprise. Judge Connor’s conduct demonstrates detailed and deep understanding of the Enterprise, while conduct of Judges Segal and more so Friedman indicates more superficial understanding.///D. Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) as an Enterprise Track caseBy now it is evident that –

1. The case represents a unique collaboration of the Enterprise with the racket at Countrywide.

2. The case was designated for the Enterprise Track since before the complaint was submitted on Oct 25, 2005. Additional discovery is likely to confirm that it was never indexed. The courts are obfuscating in allowing Zernik access to the Index of All Cases, as required by law.

3. Defendant the Honorable Judge Jacqueline Connor was never issued a valid Re-assignment Order. The purported Nov 1, 2005 Minute Order by the then Supervising Judge, the Honorable Linda Lefkowitz is a case of fraud. In fact it is dated Jan 30, 2006, a date when Judge Lefkowitz no longer served as Supervising Judge, and had no authority to assign the case. Therefore, Judge Connor presided with no authority and no immunity at all.

4. Judge Connor and other judges listed as Defendants in U.S. Court action, are with no immunity at all, as per §1983, based on the following principles:

a. The Supreme Court has held that federal law controls the immunity analysis under §1983 even if the matter in question is pending in state court – Howlett v Rose, 496 U.S. .356, 369 (1990):‘A state court may not deny a federal right, when the parties and controversy are properly before it, in the absence of “valid excuse”’

b. The Supreme Court has held that individuals sued in their official capacity are not entitled to assert individual immunity defenses in that regard. The distinction being that personal-capacity suits seek to impose personal liability upon government official for actions taken under color of state law. Official-capacity suits, in contrast, “generally represent only another way of pleading an action against the entity of which the official is agent”Kentucky v Graham 473 U.S. 159 (1985).

c. The “Functional Approach” to immunity analysis puts the burden of proving immunity on the officials sued:“Officials who seek exemption for personal liability have the burden of showing that such an exemption is justified by overriding considerations of public policy…” Forrester v White, 484 U.S. 219, 224 (1988).

d. Immunity of judges was limited by the Supreme Court in Stump v Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 356-362 (1978)and also in Mireles v Waco, 112 S. Ct. 286, 288 (1991) such that acts in the clear absence of a court’s jurisdiction are not entitled to immunity, and only judicial acts are protected.

e. Even judges who are absolutely immune for damages may be subject to suit for declaratory and injunctive relief – Consumers Union 446 U.S. at 731-34, 736.f. “Qualified Immunity” exists for public officials only for their “good faith” actions, where “their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known” Harlow v Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 (1982); Mitchell v Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 526 (1985).

5. Defendant Judge Connor engaged in obstruction and racketeering since before her the first proceedings in which she presided – Jan 30, 2006 – when she recorded Defendant’s Demurrer pursuant to the Statute of Frauds as i) Overruled, ii) Granted, and iii) Invalidated Minute Order – all at once.

6. Records and declarations produced by Countrywide were essential to the fraud, and Att Mohammad Keshavarzi (Sheppard, Mullin et al), Maria McLaurin (Countrywide Branch Manager), and Jae Arre Lloyd (Samaan’s husband and a Countrywide business associate) conspired to design such fraudulent claims as detailed in their email correspondence of Nov 3-6, 2006. Neither of these three were named Defendant in U.S. Court action so far.

7. Critical to these fraudulent claims were the following:

a. Countrywide fraudulent record – Real Estate Contract purportedly faxed from Parks (Washington State) to Countrywide (Northern California) on Oct 25., 2004, 5:03pm. In fact it was faxed on that date and that time from Samaan to Jae Arre Lloyd.

c. Fraudulent declarations by Maria McLaurin, including one in which she established the Underwriting Letter listed above as a case of “recreated letter” similar to the Countrywide case in Pennsylvania, widely publicized on or around Jan 8, 2008.

9. On July 6, 2007 Judge Connor ran proceedings unique in their abuse of Defendant’s civil rights – off the record hearing on a gag order to benefit Countrywide, under the guise of Protective Order. Such proceedings were falsely documented, and continued on July 23, 2007, still off the record. From that date on, Countrywide has been appearing routinely in Samaan v Zernik, fraudulently designating itself “Non-Party”, out of compliance and in violation of the law – California Rules of Court, Rule 1.6 Definitions and Use of Terms:(15) “Person”, (16) “Party”.

10. Attorneys John Amberg and Jenna Moldawsky (Bryan Cave, LLP) representing Countywide, knowingly colluded in racketeering in such proceedings. Not named so far in U.S. Court action.

11. Between July 12, 2007 and July 23, 2007, in her conflicting acts in statements in open court, in papers secretly entered in paper court file, and in records secretly entered in the electronic court file in Sustain, Defendant Connor engaged in fraud and deceit relative to her disqualification on July 12, 2007 by Plaintiff Zernik.

a. Presiding in a fraudulent Summary Judgment hearing, where her findings as Trier of Facts were deliberately upside-down from start to finish,

b. Initiating the fraud and deceit relative to entry of judgment, when in fact, judgment was never entered, out of compliance and in violation of the law – California Code of Civil Procedure, §664:“If the trial has been had by the court, judgment must be entered by the clerk, in conformity to the decision of the court, immediately upon the filing of such decision. In no case is a judgment effectual for any purpose until entered”, and

c. Denying Plaintiff, there Defendant Zernik, the right to amend claims and enter compulsory claims of fraud and deceit against Countrywide, against Samaan, and against Mara Escrow.

d. In the aftermath, on Aug 14, 2007, Defendant Connor entered in court file the fraudulent, back-dated Aug 9, 2007 Minute Order, with neither certificate of service nor notice of entry of order as required by law California Rules of Court, Rule 1.20 et seq. In such minute order she fraudulently claimed that Judgment by Court was served on the parties in open court on Aug 9, 2007. In fact, only two out of four parties were present in court on that day, therefore service in open court could not be completed, and of the two, one – Att Keshavarzi - later stated in open court on Nov 9, 2007 that he had never seen the Aug 9, 2007 judgment by court and was never served the Aug 9, 2007 judgment by court. Furthermore, there is no certificate of service upon the parties and no notice of entry signed by the Clerk on this record. Therefore, such minute order amounts to hearsay and an invalid court record.

a. In transferring the case to Judge Goodman after her 2nd disqualification by Defendant Zernik, with no authority at all,

b. By secretly entering on Sept 11, 2007, after disqualification, with no notice to parties, a back-dated Sept 10, 2007 Minute Order, recording a fictitious hearing where she ruled that there was no fraud in Countrywide records.

14. Defendant the Honorable Judge John Segal, never had an assignment order, and all of his acts as Presiding Judge in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) were of the nature of fraud and deceit, with no authority and no immunity at all.

15. Defendant Segal was fully aware of the fact that no judgment was entered, and so were Defendant David Pasternak, and Att Mohammad Keshavarzi.

16. Regardless, they engaged in fraud and deceit under the guise of legal proceedings, in a fraudulent motion to appoint Pasternak as “Receiver” – purportedly to enforce the execution of a judgment that was never executable at all.

17. Judge Segal and Att Pasternak engaged in intimidation, retaliation, and harassment of Plaintiff Zernik, there Defendant, and a victim/witness/informer of racketeering, through several hearings in November 2007.

18. Defendants Segal and Pasternak engineered forced entry into Defendant’s property, and taking of property for private use with no compensation to Defendant at all.

19. Defendant Pasternak proceeded to engage in further conspiracy with Defendant Mara Escrow, and Att Richard Ormond (Buchalter Nemer) – not named Defendant in U.S. Court action so far, for fraudulent conveyance of title of the property.

20. Defendant Pasternak proceeded to engage in fraud and deceit relative to an invalid grand deed that he purportedly presented for Court approval on Dec 7, 2007, before the Defendant the Honorable Judge Lisa Hart-Cole and the then Defendant Assistant Supervising Judge, the Honorable Patricia Collins. Both Defendants Hart-Cole and Collins knowingly colluded with the Enterprise.

21. Defendant Pasternak produced yet another invalid fraudulent grant deed that he recorded in the Office of Recorder/Registrar on Dec 17, 2007. It is likely that upon further discovery Notary Public Lisa Khaleydjian be found in collusion with such fraud relative to the fraudulent grant deeds.

22. Defendant the Honorable Judge Terry Friedman, never had an assignment order, and all of his acts as Presiding Judge in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) were of the nature of fraud and deceit, with no authority and no immunity at all.

23. On Jan 11, 2007, at Countrywide’s request. Defendant Friedman fraudulently ruled that the “Protective Order…”, which Defendant Connor deliberately avoided signing and entering, was “..in full force and effect”. He then proceeded on Feb 15, 2007 and March 7, 2008, to fraudulently set sanctions exceeding $22,000 on Defendant Zernik and find him in contempt, relative to purported violations in 2007 of such ex post facto order.

24. Judge Friedman was also disqualified three times, and in none of the cases complied with the law- California Code of Civil Procedure §170.3.

25. Judge Friedman intends to continue presiding in proceedings on July 29, 2008 in Samaan v Zernik, in which he is likely to order distribution of funds, purportedly received by the court for the sale of Zernik’s home, back to Samaan.

26. Request filed with Presiding Judge Czuleger to enforce the law of the land, to put an end to Defendant Terry Friedman’s vigilante conduct in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400), and to allow a hearing before the Presiding Judge in this matter, or any other judge, duly assigned, is still to be answered.

G. Additional Support Evidence for Allegations Detailed AbovePlaintiff Zernik filed in the various respective courts records documenting various parts of the overall narrative related above. In addition, Zernik filed records documenting hundreds of false and deliberately misleading litigation records produced by the judges of the Los Angeles Superior court, in support of his allegations of racketeering.

H. Additional Discovery NeededDefinitive evidence will be found upon review of the LASC Book of Judgments, Index of All Cases, Calendars of the Courts, and Registers of Actions. And precisely for that reason, all three courts are obfuscating on allowing Zernik access to inspect and review the Book of Judgments, as required by law. Regardless, whether or not such access is allowed, sufficient evidence is being produced to the point that such evidence would not be essential. However, Zernik will continue to demand access to the Book of Judgment in all three courts - since continued obfuscation of the three courts to allow access to the Book of Judgments, a basic First Amendment right, is likely to serve as prime evidence of the incapacity of the Judiciary to regulatregulate itself in matters involving corruption of the courts.

I. Preliminary Estimate of Damages Claimed and Awards to be Requested in U.S. District Court ActionDamages Claimed1. Equity in the Property ………… ~$900,000Zernik assume he will never see a penny from the equity of the purported sale.2. Tax Liability ………… ~$300,000Zernik is likely to be saddled with tax liability for the purported sale even if he does not see a penny of the proceeds. Receiver Pasternak deliberately avoided paying tax at the closing of the fraudulent escrow, so that he would be left with maximum cash.3. Notes Liability ………… $?In one of the hallmarks of the abusive/retaliatory appointment of the receiver, Defendant Segal authorized Defendant Pasternak, appointed outside of any legal framework, to issue unlimited notes in Zernik’s name at hefty interest.4. Legal Services ………… ~$400,000Some of the legal expenses are still in disputed charges on American Express Card (~$60,000) and Visa Card ($6,000) for fraudulent services of Att Zachary Schorr, Defendant in U.S. Court action.5. Other Legal Expenses ………… ~$50,0006. Lost Income (Nov 2006 to July 2008) ………… ~$350,0007. Automobile and Related Expenses ………… ~$100,000TOTAL ………… ~$2,100,000

I, Joseph Zernik, am Defendant & Cross-Complainant in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) matter heard in Los Angeles Superior Court, West District, I am also Appellant in Zernik v Los Angeles Superior Court (B203063 – noticed 10/5/07 and B204544 – notice 12/10/07), matters currently in preparation of records on appeal for California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, and also Plaintiff in Zernik v Connor at al (2:2008cv01550), matter heard in U.S. District Court, Los Angeles.I have read the foregoing Notice to Cease and Desist and I know the content thereof to be true and correct. It is true and correct based on my own personal knowledge as Defendant & Cross Complainant, as Appellant, and as Plaintiff in pro per, except as to those matters therein stated as based upon information and belief, and as to to those matters, I believe them to be true and correct as well.I make this declaration that the foregoing is true and correct under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of California and the United States.Executed here in Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, on this 28th day in July, 2008.

Monday, July 21, 2008

THE CODE OF HAMMURABI WAS WRITTEN ON STONE, BUT CLAY WAS THE MOST COMMON MEDIA - $1,000 CASH PRIZE FOR DIGITAL-AGE ANSWERS

And yet, Hammurabi (~1760BCE) is credited with generating a code - a deliberate attempt to eliminate ambiguity in the court room.

Hammurabi is known for the set of laws called Hammurabi's Code, one of the first written codes of law in recorded history. These laws were written on a stone tablet standing over six feet tall that was found in 1901. Owing to his reputation in modern times as an ancient law-giver, Hammurabi's portrait is in many government buildings throughout the world (Wikipedia).

With the transsition into the digital age, ~1980 (the emergence of dBase and large scale database management programs), the Los Angeles Superior Court managed to bring us further back then Hammurabi...

The essence of generating a code, for which Hammurabi is given the credit, is in reduced ambiguity in the courtroom. Today we call it Due Process, and it is inherently tied to civil rights and protection of the weak from the stronger, with transparency, and with elimination of corruption.

But the transision to the digital age, presumbaly progress, was accopanied by the opposite process - a deliberate attempt to increase ambiguity in the court room. Things that were simple and clear became elusive and abstract notions, and therefore - fertile ground for the growth of obstruction and corruption. Following are some basic questions you should ask any lawyer appearing before the Los Angeles Superior Court. This blogger is offering a bet of $1,000, that no attorney in Los Angeles County can umbigously answer the following simple questins relative to the Los Angeles County Superior Court:

What is the Book of Judgments (1. Book of Judgments)?

Where is the Book of Judgments?

Why it is hidden from the public in violation of the law?

What does it mean "to enter into the Book of Judgments" (2. Entry of Judgmennt)?

What does it mean to notice (to notify) that Judgment was entered into the Book of Judgment (3. Notice of Entry of Judgment)?

In the 30 years since the introduction of computers into the LA Superior Court, the Judiciary managed to ambiguate even a simple concept, at third degree of separation from the original one - Book of Judgments - which is by now a complete mystery to most.

How did the judiciary manage to pull off such a hoax on a county of millions?

Well - this is Los Angeles County!

How did the judiciary manage to pull off such a hoax on a one fo the largest legal communities in the U.S.?

Well- one must assume it was beneficial to the bigger, stronger offices.

How did the judiciary manage to pull off such a hoax over ACLU, the Califonia First Amendment Project, the California First Amendment Coalition, a number of excellent law schools with some of the finest constitutionnal law professors in the Country?

This notice does not constitute any recognition of the LA Superior Court to engage as a Court in Samaan v Zernik SC087400. On the contrary, this notice is to alert parties to formal challenge to the authority of such court in this matter.

Judge Rosenberg was not present today in court. Therefore, the "ex parte" noticed for today will roll over to Monday.

I write to provide notice that at 8:30 a.m. on Monday, July 21, 2008, I will appear "Ex Parte" in the West District of the Los Angeles County Superior Court located at 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, California 90401, in department A. before Supervising Judge Rosenberg, in RE: Samaan v Zernik, SC087400.

This ex parte requests that the Supervising Judge vacate all acts of judges including, but not limited to, Connor, Segal, and Friedman, and neutrals, such as Pasternak, who operated under the color of the court, all of whom were and are part of the Enterprise in and by the LA Superior Court.

Therefore, Keshavarzi's notice of ruling, dated July 17, 2008, is invalid on its face. And the fact that Terry Friedman continues to pretend to be Presiding Judge with valid authority in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) as a legitimate court action, is simply an attempt to continue living in denial.

Similarly, attorneys who generate or actively participate in such activity cannot expect to benefit from any "litigation privileges". Events, such as the one staged by Keshavarzi on July 17, 2008, 8:30am, were not part of any legitimate court action.

The bottom line remains the same as always: The Los Angeles Superior Court continues to hide the books of court, and refuses to allow Defendant in pro per to inspect and to copy the books of court, where evidence should be found that would conclusively show that this is a legitimate court action. The Los Angeles County Superior Court takes such absurd position for a reason - since inspecting the books of court would incriminate the court and the judges, and some attorneys as well...

In short- the Court is taking the 5th. (the king is naked...)

Please let me know if you plan to attend and/or oppose.

Joseph Zernik

U.S. Citizen

Victim of the Enterprise

in and by"Judges" of LA Superior Court and others

P.S.

While at court today, I again asked the Office of the Clerk to allow me to inspect and to copy litigation records of Samaan v Zernik (SC087400), to determine if and when the Aug 9, 2007 Judgment by Court Pursuant to CCP 437c was entered.The Clerk insisted that for security reasons I was not allowed to see the data myself, and instead went back for a while (to call Connor?), then came back with copy the paper fraudulently marked "Minutes Entered Aug 9, 2007 County Clerk". That paper was fraudulently entered into the system on Aug 14, 2008, but was never even validly entered as a Minute Order. Furthermore - it is fraudulent in its content. Obviously, that paper is neither proof of entry of judgment, nor a valid Minute Order, merely one more predicated act of the Enterprise.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Case name: Manouchehr Galdjie v Barbara Kramer Darwish and David DarwishLos Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SC052737This is yet another real property case, in this instance - a rental property. Blogger believes that real property fraud is the specialty of the racketeering enterprise at the Los Angeles Superior Court. 1) The victims of the racketeering in this case are Defendants. Blogger does not know either Plaintiffs or Defendants, but would be grateful for any information that would allow him to establish contact with Defendants:

Barbara Kramer Darwish

David Darwish

2) The record of this litigation stretches from 05/27/98 to 11/02/06. The length of this litigation alone should justify further investigation.

2) Judges or court officer in this case are listed below. The length of this list alone makes this case an extreme that should be investigated:

Alan B. Haber

Robert M. Letteau

David B. Finkel

John H. Reid

Candance D. Cooper

Paul G. Flynn

Patricia L. Collins

David J. Pasternak

Clerk (no name recorded), presiding in event

Retired Judge (no name recorded), presiding in event

Muni Judge (no name recorded), presiding in event

John L Segal

David J Pasternak, receiver

Comments:

1) With all of the above, not a single Assignment or Re-assignment Order is listed in this file.

2) No recusals or disqualifications are listed in this file. And yet, several motions to vacate are listed in this file, which imply some inordinate situations in the course of this litigation.

3) It appears that certain details were deleted from the record, yet no nunc pro tunc orders are listed in this file.

4) The paper court file of this case is overdue for transmission to the LA County archives, but it was not found there. Per the archive the paper court file is most likely stored by the Santa Monica Courthouse, outside of normal procedures.

Conclusions:

A reasonable person would conclude that the record in its current form is not the full and complete original record, but an adulterated record, where certain events were eliminated after being initially recorded. Yet no nunc pro tunc orders are listed in this file.

Notice:

Blogger does not hold any unique evidence. All evidence is distributed on a regular basis to several destination.

On Thursday, July 17, 2008, Zernik will appear before supervising judge Rosenberg and demand to inspect and to copy the Book of Judgments

The only plausible explanation for the complete set of facts in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) a real property specific performance litigation, is that the case was designated by the leadership and judges of the LA Superior Court since before its inception for fraud under the guise of legitimate legal action in the court. Therefore, the case was never adequately registered as a true legal action in either the LA Superior Court or the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District. Accordingly, both courts are now hiding their books and refusing to allow Zernik to inspect and to copy the books of court, as required by law.Since the case was never ran on the record, none of the judges had a valid assignment order, and with that – none of them has any immunity for their actions in this case.

These judges were caught engaging in criminal conduct. Did they do it for fun? For profit?

On Thursday, July 17, 2008, 8:30am Zernik will appear before Supervising Judge Rosenberg and demand to inspect and to copy the Book of Judgments, which the court is keeping hidden, in violation of the law.

This notice does not constitute any recognition of the LA Superior Court to engage as a Court in Samaan v Zernik SC087400. On the contrary, this notice is to alert parties to formal challenge to the authority of such court in this matter.I write to provide notice that at 8:30 a.m. on Thursday, July 17, 2008, I will appear "Ex Parte" in the West District of the Los Angeles County Superior Court located at 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, California 90401, in department A. before Supervising Judge Rosenberg, in RE: Samaan v Zernik, SC087400.

1) To demand that the court remove from its records a minute order dated June 2, 2008, entered by "Judge" Terry Friedman, purportedly striking Zernik's declaration of Mistrial of the same date:a. The records of Samaan v Zernik are ongoing records of racketeering, and this record again tries to establish false legitimacy and validity to such records.b. Mr Terry Friedman did not have any valid authority to enter legal records in this case at that time, had it been a true legal record of a true court case in LA Superior Court.c. The entry was done with no notice to parties, in blatant violation of California Rules of Court, and therefore was and is invalid.d. The record is nonsensical from the legal perspective, stating: "The Court strikes the declaration as having any legal effect. Further notice is not necessary"

2) To demand that the Supervising Judge, Gerald Rosenberg at the time of such appearance, produce Books of Court to inspect and to copy, as required by law per Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589 (1978). Such books or equivalents are on computers accessible from the courtroom, including, but not limited to:a. Index of All Cases,b. Calendars of the Courts,c. Registers of Actions, andd. Book of Judgments.

Such review is urgent and of the utmost significance, since the preponderance of the evidence indicates that Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) was and is managed all along "off the record" as part of racketeering enterprise operating inside the West District courthouse, and not as a legitimate court action of the State of California Superior Court of the Los Angeles County.

Please let me know if you plan to attend and/or oppose.

Joseph ZernikU.S. CitizenVictim of Racketeeringin and by "Judges" of LA Superior Court and others

Monday, July 7, 2008

What happens when the books are hidden? Adulterated Minute Orders, corrupt trial court litigation records, secret Off the Record proceedings, secret judicial orders, secret Off the Record cases.. see the data for yourself below

OUR GOAL IS TO OPEN THE JUDGMENT BOOKSOF LA SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE PUBLIC-AT-LARGETO INSPECT AND TO COPY, AS REQUIRED BY LAWWITHIN 10 DAYS FROM THE FOURTH OF JULY!WE SEEK SUPPORT STATEMENTS AND MORE HELP US BRING LOS ANGELES BACK INTO THE FOLDOF THEU.S. CONSTITUTION!

Willing to help?Public support is essential... Please help, see below under:Willing to help?

Off the Record proceedings for blatantly illegal purposes - e.g. Gag Orders...

Off the Record cases, where the judiciary can engage in abuse at will...

EXHIBIT 1Minute Orders in Samaan v Zernik - validity, or lack thereof

Note:

1. Paper - refers to paper court records, which are the records open to the public-at-large, litigants, and counsels (column 5)

2. Electronic- refers to electronic court records, which are hidden from the public-at-large, litigants, and counsels, and are available to the court and the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District (Column 6)

00/00/00 - cases of fraud by the Court on the parties - minute order that was secretly invalidated

33/33/33 -cases of fraud by the Court on the parties - minute order that was secretly invalidated

Minute Order #2 -a case of fraud by the court on the parties, a false and deliberately misleading Assignment Order of Judge Connor.

Minute Order #27 - a case of fraud by the court on Zernik, a false and deliberately misleading Minute Order of a hearing that was purportedly conducted "telephonically", but in fact never took place in reality. Pure fabrication of Judge Connor at a time that the California Court of Appeal was reviewing a Petition.

Minute Orders #35, 38 - a case of fraud, direclty related to the fraud on the Judgment that was never entered. These minute orders were generated to create the illusion of a judgment that was entered. But as seen in letter from the office of the Presiding Judge, the Court now is not willing to provide a certificate of entered judgment.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------Willing to help?

1) Please enter your support statement, with name and address as comment. Comments will be printed and mailed to congress by July 14th, 2008.2) Please email your friends and ask them to enter comments...3) Please contact any of the congressional offices below and state your support

4) Please stay tuned for "Opening the Books" Beach-Party/demand for an honest court next week.

Where exactly is Jerry Brown, California Attorney General in all of this? Probably working on his campaign plans forBrown for Governor, disjioned from reality....

Please call Mr Brown's office 916 324 5437talk with Sue or Anna, and tell them you would never vote for Brown for anything if he goes on abandoning the basic civil rights of 9.5 million people in LA County.

22.Hon. Conyers Jr., ChairmanU.S. House of RepresentativesCommittee on the judiciary2138 Rayburn House Office BuildingWashington, DC 20515

23.Hon. Nadler, ChairmanSubcommittee on the Constitution, CivilRights, and Civil LibertiesU.S. House of RepresentativesCommittee on the judiciary2138 Rayburn House Office BuildingWashington, DC 20515p/202-225-3951

Saturday, July 5, 2008

June 3, 2008 Corrspondence with the office of the Clerk and the Presiding Judge, LA Superior Court & refusal of the Court to open its Book of Judgments for inspection, moreover - refusal to certify entry of judgment

June 3, 2008 Correspondence:

The Books of Court are by Law public records - but not in Los Angeles.

Copied below are two letters:

1) Letter from Zernik to Office of the Clerk of Los Angeles Superior Court-

Asking certification of either entry of jugment or non-entry of judgment. Such absurd request was needed in thhe first place since the court refuses to allow inspection of its Book of Judgments, in violation of the Law.

2) Response by the Assistant Presiding Judge - McCoy- Refusing to certify either entry or non-entry of the judgment.

The judgment in question is a fraudulent judgment issued by Judge Jacqueline Connor on Aug 9, 2007, as the core of the racketeering in this case. Thereafter, she stated repeatedly in writings and in open court that she entered the judgment on Aug 9, 2007.

The underlying Racket:

The Los Angeles Superior Court created also rules - never fully specified in writing, that allows entry of judgment with no written notice of entry of judgment, or so they would like to make the public believe.

Based on such non-existent judgment, Judge John Segal, and Judge Terry Friedman have move on to:

1) Take Defendant property that is his home with no legal foundation, through sheer threat of force.

2) Deprive Defendant of any compensation for such Taking.

The Racketeers:

This perversion of justice was not the making of one corrupt judge. Instead, it was the outcome of the coordinated conduct of a group of judges, comprising the majority of the judges in the Santa Monica Court House Civil Department. The judges involved in such racketeering are:

1) Jacqueline Connor

2) Allan Goodman

3) John Segal

4) Lisa Hart-Cole

5) Patricia Collins

6) Supervising Judge Gerald Rosenberg

7) Assistant Presiding Judge William McCoy

Colluding Racketeers at Countrywide:

Full partners in this racketeering are Countrywide Financial Corporation and its Officers and employees:

1) Angelo Mozillo

2) Sandor Samuels

3) Maria McLaurin

4) Sanford Shatz

5) Todd Boock

Countrywide had no business whatsoever with Defendant Zernik. Countrywide simply offered fraudulent records as a favor for a business partner - Jae Arre Lloyd, and his wife - Nivie Samaan.

1) June 3, 2008 Letter to the office of the Clerk requesting certification of either entry of judgment, alternatively - non-entry of judgment. (click on the image for larger view)

11-12-10 Where should Occupy go next? Civil Disobedience in the footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!http:// www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/12-06-08 Courts and Judges as racketeering enterprises under RICO (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - key element in the current financial crisishttp://www.scribd.com/doc/96504009/Secede! The US in its current form is simply unmanageable...

What did the experts say?

* דוח סייג לזכויות האדם נכלל בדוח התקופתי של האו"ם לגבי זכויות האדם בישראל (2013), בלוויית ההערה: "חוסר יושרה בכתבים האלקטרוניים של בית המשפט העליון, בתי המשפט המחוזיים, ובתי הדין למוחזקי משמורת בישראל".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2010 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in the United States, with the note: "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2013 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in Israel, with the note: "lack of integrity of the electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel."

The United States

* "...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* Los Angeles County is"the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud."FBI (2004)

* “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000)

* “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.”Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/239647129/The HRA submission was incorporated into the 2015 HRC Professional Staff Report on the United States with the note: :“HRA NGO recommended restoring the integrity of the IT systems of the courts, under accountability to the Congress, with the goal of making such systems as transparent as possible to the public at large.”

[2] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2013 UPR of the State of Israel was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Lack of integrity in the electronic record systems of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees' courts in Israel".

2012-06-04 Human Right Alert's Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the

[3] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2010 UPR of the United States was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."

2010-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the

2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:

[1] 10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States, where Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission was incorporated with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/http://www.scribd.com/doc/108663259/