The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.

pankajs wrote:No one has to believe the punished range but 5k-8k is enough to give China the shivers. I am just pointing out that nomenclature does not / should not have any impact on future development.

The ranges are much higher than published which is the crux of the matter.

^^sorry I cant understand why are we discussing our missile ranges vis a vis china in UK thread, in a country, that gives aid to us and we use that aid to launch mars rockets instead of building toilets

While international law forbids nations from making people stateless, Javid may argue that Begum can apply for Bangladeshi citizenship, despite her saying she has never visited the country. Human rights lawyer Shoaib Khan said that even if the decision to revoke Begum’s citizenship turns out to be legal, it should never have been taken. He told: ‘She was radicalised in the UK and this country must take responsibility for that. In the 21st century, there should be no tolerance for medieval punishments like exile. ‘She has never been to Bangladesh, it seems, and should not be their responsibility. The British Government should take responsibility for its people and fulfil the duties that come with that. ‘Also, the only way we can prevent her from causing any harm to the UK is by having her here where we can monitor her.

...the United Kingdom is under an obligation to bring an end to its administration of the Chagos Archipelago as rapidly as possible, thereby enabling Mauritius to complete the decolonization of its territory in a manner consistent with the right of peoples to self-determination....

Not on the list of priorities of the CPS or the Met to pursue prosecution. We desperately need an EU style extradition arrangement with the UK post-Brexit trade deal (if some sanity prevails). Also after Priti Patel's exit from cabinet, there aren't many to bat for Swades.

Not on the list of priorities of the CPS or the Met to pursue prosecution. We desperately need an EU style extradition arrangement with the UK post-Brexit trade deal (if some sanity prevails). Also after Priti Patel's exit from cabinet, there aren't many to bat for Swades.

squeeze them in ways that hurts them very badly.

we have had enough schitt from their BBC, MPs and NGOs and even their general public.

All of them have shown extreme contempt for India and Indians since even before 1947.

mmasand wrote:Not on the list of priorities of the CPS or the Met to pursue prosecution. We desperately need an EU style extradition arrangement with the UK post-Brexit trade deal (if some sanity prevails). Also after Priti Patel's exit from cabinet, there aren't many to bat for Swades.

squeeze them in ways that hurts them very badly.

we have had enough schitt from their BBC, MPs and NGOs and even their general public.

All of them have shown extreme contempt for India and Indians since even before 1947.

for a start, just walk away from the commonwealth.

I agree with your sentiment about the BBC ( we all hate them for forcing us to pay them). The govt is in mired in a deep hole they can't get themselves out of in the face of the deadlock in HoC. India and an economic fugitive is last on the list when knife crime is the highest in over a decade and CPS does not have the resources to prosecute. Wait it out till summer when 'no deal' will force them to come to the negotiating table for a trade deal.

LONDON — The failure to secure a deal to leave the European Union may lead to violence on British streets, according to a senior British lawmaker.David Gauke, the U.K.'s secretary of state for justice, said a no-deal Brexit would be a disaster for the country, including the immediate ending of U.K.-EU cooperation on vital law enforcement issues."In the worst-case scenario if we had significant difficulties with food supplies no one is going to be left starving but if there are empty shelves, can that result in violence and more criminal cases?" he said in an interview with the Times published Saturday. "Of course it can.”The British cabinet minister added that he believes Prime Minister Theresa May will not be able to get her Brexit deal through parliament during a vital vote next week, and said he backs delaying Brexit beyond the March 29 deadline so that an agreement with the EU can be reached.

The Brexit deal as negotiated currently (the article is a little dated, but I don't much has changed) will reduce Britain to an EU colony - subject to EU laws and EU courts, but having no say in it. The EU babus have a very tight grip on the Brit B@ll$

The Brexit deal as negotiated currently (the article is a little dated, but I don't much has changed) will reduce Britain to an EU colony - subject to EU laws and EU courts, but having no say in it. The EU babus have a very tight grip on the Brit B@ll$

this simply means that vijay mallaya's extradition becomes very much harder now as it may go to the eu courts.

we need to ram both the eu and the uk in all economic agreements and trade deals until they listen to our concerns rather than take some pseudo moral high ground as they took in the eyetalian marine case where white lives are valued higher than brown ones and blood money payment agreements with the MURDERED natives' families started with the phrase "in the name of christ"

these dickheads still think that the natives can be bought off for some beads and trinkets.

The Brexit deal as negotiated currently (the article is a little dated, but I don't much has changed) will reduce Britain to an EU colony - subject to EU laws and EU courts, but having no say in it. The EU babus have a very tight grip on the Brit B@ll$

this simply means that vijay mallaya's extradition becomes very much harder now as it may go to the eu courts.

we need to ram both the eu and the uk in all economic agreements and trade deals until they listen to our concerns rather than take some pseudo moral high ground as they took in the eyetalian marine case where white lives are valued higher than brown ones and blood money payment agreements with the MURDERED natives' families started with the phrase "in the name of christ"

these dickheads still think that the natives can be bought off for some beads and trinkets.

Categorically no, extradition of non-EU nationals do not go to EU courts.

its formality. he will produce bail.the uk extradition process in time and cost is designed to provide max relief to the legions of HNI thieves and absconders who have parked themselves and the loot there.

her majesty's govt takes good care of them - EXCEPT if massa leans on them to recover its own absconders.