I understand your point. I was just trying to think through Jason Reid's reasoning. I'm not sure the connection he makes between drafting Berry and trading for Bradford is clear.

It sounds more like a swap, they draft Bradford, we draft Berry and then we exchange them?

Ok maybe not, this is what happened in the Rivers/Manning swap:

"The top pick of the draft hasn't been traded since 2004, when San Diego shipped Eli Manning to the New York Giants. The cost was high then -- first-round pick Phillip Rivers, plus a third-rounder in 2004 and first- and fifth-round picks in 2005. You can bet that if the Rams are listening to offers for the No. 1 pick in this year's draft, the asking price will be similarly high. (The Redskins hold the No. 4 overall pick, the same one the Giants held in '04 when they traded for Manning.)"

I still find it funny that all these people are coming up with these Vinny'esque trades for skill position players. Maybe Cerrato should have never left in this case.

Hahahaha well said man. Most skins fans would like nothing but big names players I see.
Here's what everyone should consider, in 5 years when Eric Berry, Russell Okung, Suh, McCoy,etc. have all potentially become star players at their respectful positions everyone will understand why you don't make stupid trades like this.
Let the Rams take Bradford and try to change the worst team in the league into anything past a 4-12 team. It juts won't happen and maybe in 3-4 years we can consider picking him up after his other shoulder get's damaged.