He may not have finished entirely, right. But as far as Trump team is concerned (and as much as any of us care about), it is over.

Trust me when I say its unusual for the indictment to mention team Trump. Did Manafort's indictment state a CONCLUSION about the whole team? Did
Flynn's? Papadoapapa's? No. When there was no information, they simply didn't include it.

The fact it was included with these trolls is important. Investigators don't state conclusions until the conclusions are made

The investigation is over as far as Trump is concerned. 99% certain of that. I am 100% certain their admission makes charging Trump or anyone on his
team with conspiracy nearly impossible at this point. They'd have to have some strong evidence come forward for them to change their CONCLUSION. And
FYI lefties, they wouldn't have stated their CONCLUSION if there were still more witnesses/evidence.

So unless something new and shocking comes up (it won't, Trump did nothing wrong as we've said all along) he's in the clear.

Otherwise the indictment wouldn't have said a word about Trump.

You're the one fooling yourself if you actually believe Mueller would state a CONCLUSION that Trump's team wasn't involved in the circa-2013
conspiracy and then retract it later. That would make him look incompetent. If there is so much more to come (there isn't, not for Trump/team) why
wouldn't they simply not mention Trump in the indictment?

Your logic has serious flaws, as you can see from above. Ergo, you're mistaken (as I said three pages ago).

There may be, but if there are, it seems increasingly unlikely it would be for election related matters. Could be a process crime in there or a
financial crime that they've uncovered, but I don't see where the Russian collusion narrative has anywhere to go from here. The statement that there
were no Americans knowingly involved in this is straightforward and telling.

For this set of indictments.
He just entered into a plea agreement or is currently working on a plea deal with Rick Gates.
There are now three former trump people working for Bob Mueller.
I don't hear any fat lady singing.

Don't forget the wire that was used before everyone found out Papadumbass rolled.

Heavy sigh. Umm yeah.
There will be indictments where there are crimes.
So far there's no indication that Mueller is looking at Clinton or their foundation or James Comey or anyone in Obama's administration. So chances
are there won't be indictments.
There are however loads of indications that he's looking right at trump.
Deny it if you wish.

If there is so much more, why would Mueller issue a CONCLUSION RE: team Trump?

Why would he make it harder for himself to prosecute Team Trump?

This is how I know you guys are here to push an agenda. Despite overwhelming evidence otherwise, you still continue to push your debunked liar
narrative.

We're wise to your tricks

No I mean the advisor who was the reason for one of the FISA warrants because he was caught running his mouth to an Australian Official about
conspiring with Kremlin contacts to receive intelligence supposedly of Ohh wait for it,,,,

But the FISA warrants are now irrelevant. Mueller's CONCLUSION (they only issue those once, BTW) is that Team Trump wasn't willfully involved in any
conspiracy against the US.

You can't twist that in any way. You can try (you are trying), but failing miserably.

You're both wrong and neither one of you will admit it. Learning from your own ignorance is a sign of intelligence, I do it all the time myself. But
you are both absolutely wrong on what you're saying. I don't care if you know it or whatever else. But you are.

Go ahead and keep wasting time on this though and sharing your propaganda (sorry, "views"). And I'll keep ensuring the truth is always right there,
nearby.

What I'm saying is both logical and frankly irrefutable. This is one information conflict you guys have lost. All you have to do is explain why
Mueller would issue a conclusion if there was more evidence to review RE: Trump, or if he planned to charge him with some nebulous conspiracy. If he
was, he wouldn't give the defense so much ammo by saying they weren't involved in the conspiracy (which started in 2013 anyhow)

If Trump was still under investigation, why would he bother to include that paragraph about Team Trump to begin with? Why not limit it to the relevant
topic at hand, the Russian trolls? Why bother to include POTUS/team at all? I'll tell you why, because as I said he's doing the closest thing to
clearing Trump that were going to get.

Want your narrative back? All you have to do is dispute what I said above (but you actually have to use logic, not your mystical "phases" and wishful
thinking)

In an indictment announced Friday in Washington, Mueller describes a years-long, multimillion-dollar conspiracy by hundreds of Russians aimed at
criticizing Hillary Clinton and supporting SenatorBernie Sanders and Trump. Mueller charged 13 Russian nationals and three Russian
entities and accused them of defrauding the U.S. government by interfering with the political process.

Are they kidding??? We all know what she did to steal that election from him!!!!

There is also a guy from CA called Richard Pinedo who supposedly set up the accounts.

Just goes to show that the Russians didn't do much to effect anything. If they did, Bernie would've beat out Hillary in the primaries. But I know
I'm preaching to the choir here, since we all know this Russian investigation is nothing but a way to undermine Trump's presidency.

ETA: It didn't quote what you quoted so here it is again for all to see.

In an indictment announced Friday in Washington, Mueller describes a years-long, multimillion-dollar conspiracy by hundreds of Russians aimed at
criticizing Hillary Clinton and supporting Senator Bernie Sanders and Trump. Mueller charged 13 Russian nationals and three Russian entities and
accused them of defrauding the U.S. government by interfering with the political process.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.