Synopsis: It starts with an innocent, playful prank: Thomas Lee pilots a remote-controlled toy truck equipped with a miniature digital movie camera down a hallway and into the bathroom where it films his girlfriend, Chelsy Sun, as she stands nude in the shower. When Chelsy confronts Lee and chides him for the juvenile stunt he apologizes, and then he turns his attentions to her lithe, shapely body — she is totally nude, after all. One thing quickly leads to another and Chelsy is soon riding to ecstasy astride Lee. There's an interruption in the intercourse during which Ms. Sun lovingly and skillfully fellates Mr. Lee, a favor he repays with cunnilingus and orgasm-inducing digital probing, followed by a final extended session of screwing to a mutually-satisfying internal finish. Director Andrej Lupin knows that turnabout is fair play so he ends the film on a high and hilarious note as Chelsy Sun exacts her revenge, proving once more that what's good for the goose is good for the gander. "Play With Me" is a good choice for viewers with a taste for clever, entertaining erotic cinema and passionate, loving sex.

Photo Gallery Play With Me

18 Members commented on Chelsea Sun's movie

I am quite often reading complaints about our style of lightning our movies. maybe how some people would say NON-lightning :)

We try to shoot something different, special, cinematographic - in other way I would say: NO CHEAP PORN where you can see every detail how the penetration works (almost like a instruction documentary movie how to have sex).

When you watch Hollywood movies, you have shadows, dark shots, intimated lightning - the thing which make the movie a good movie is what you feel during watching it. Sadness, fun, happiness, despair of the actors in the movie..
That is what we focus on in our movies - to have real act from our actors - to transfer their feelings to you. To give you something REAL.

Mostly our setup preparations before the shoot take us much more time than the shoot itself, so I am bit sad that our members think that we don't take care about the lightning.

SexArt site is special, tasteful, cinematographic, passion, romantic - In one word DIFFERENT.

Maybe its just my opinion but many people have learn to look at "porn" in a different way. In a way where nobody has to be ashamed that he is watching it. That he can be proud that he saw a beautiful movie where people have sex for camera. As I am PROD that I can show our movies to my mother, grandfather, friends and they just marvel and admire the beauty and differences of the movies.

The question is: What you want to see? Super shiny shoots of how the cock/dildo/finger is entering the pussy or real feelings with extraordinary light which give to the scene something special?

What would you choose in your real life? Sex in a bright room or in a pleasantly light room? What would or actors answer? :)

I know, million people million notions.. I just hope that now everyone knows and understand why we setup our lightning how we do it and how you see it.

As you say: million people, million notions!
Since your (and the whole team's) work pleases most of us, so much, so often, you should indeed be proud.
Occasionally one, or a few, of us will be less pleased ...
I am not a fan of b/g, but (unlike BHatWWD, with whom I often but not always agree!) I watched this to the end, without missing bits out on the way ...

It's been said (Woody Allen?) that the main difference between good sex and GREAT sex is mainly the matter of the lighting. I do like lighting that creates a particular mood and a film that carries that mood to a narrative conclusion. Some of the best work here (both stills and films) are those that have a strong lighting "point of view" that is critical to the work. Both lighting AND music are integral to good film making. So, I say ignore those who clamor for operating table/gynecological examination types of lighting and keep on striving for real story-telling that features emotions, moods, and evocative lighting that pushes that story.

Now, having said that, it seems to me that on occasion, lighting by various photographers does not completely measure up to what I've just described. Flat flash photography, in situ florescent lights that turn skin tones green, slow shutter speeds (due to low light levels) that result in blurring, badly PLACED lights, etc. do not further a story, but can take away from it. It's not the norm on SexArt, but it does happen.

I am glad to hear Arel confirm that her and Andrej's teams take such thoughtful care in the lighting of their films. Because the vast amount of the time it really, truly does show and we get amazing films with lighting that truly "illuminates" the story.

This particular film (for me) didn't seem to quite measure up to the normal excellence, however. NOT because it didn't show every little detail of penetration; rather, it just was a little dark at times and the darkness DID NOT serve to further the playful MOOD of the story. The playfulness was dimmed, instead, just a bit.

Sorry, Thanks to the dim lighting and heavy shadows what could have been epic was merely frustrating. Chelsy has a fantastic body and a beautiful face and the interaction between the 2 is great and VERY sensual and real but we don't get to see much so it is frustrating. A missed opportunity. :(

Yes, kind of hard to see the penetration until side views showed the horn go in. But one thing I would like to see is a trio with DV. Like one friend sharing his GF with a buddy not in a gonzo style but a trio friendship with double internal. Sort of sealing the friendship by allowing bud to release inside with no jealousy whatsoever.

Interesting idea, but it would need the RIGHT trio and director to keep it within the standards of SexArt. Too easy to slide into standard DP porn. If done, I think I would want to see it "told" as a story from the lady's perspective. It should be HER initiation and gift to the friendship of the guys, perhaps. Maybe she sees the guys pal-ing around through a window, gets the idea, and later suggests it to her partner. Then they all get together for a subsequent threesome, which she totally controls and directs. Maybe the couple starts just together, but she maintains eye contact and flirts with the pal and then invites him in when the partner nods it's okay. Or someething like that. Hmmmm.

For me it is a shame that APF has chosen to not comment here very much about her and Andrej's work because I get the feeling some are missing the point here. IMO we "see" exactly what Andrej wanted this to be, an almost voyeuristic look at these two at play. We see enough of perfect lighting, focus, etc from Andrej that the way he shot this episode is 100% intentional the soft focus the switches back and forth to the robot cam says this was not a performance for us but our "sneaking" in on a real sex escapade, all the way through to the internal ejaculation. So for me it was an excellent example of what SexArt is all about i.e not the same shtick every time. As it states in introduction that the ending was worth it to stay with it all the way through. And I am constantly amazed at the new talent APF finds and brings to us. Chelsy "may" just be acting but she sold me on the fact she was into it. I look forward to what we see her in, in the future, she is another great addition to the family. Both Alis and the Lupins are constantly outdoing themselves and raising the artistic merit of our site.