Vladimir Putin’s re-election also marks four years since he annexed Crimea

On Sunday, March 18, Vladimir Putin was elected to rule Russia as president for a further six years.

But the date also marked the fourth anniversary of his annexation of the Crimean Peninsula, or as Russia describes it the “peaceful return” of the “historically Russian” region to the Russian Federation

On February 27, 2014, masked Russian troops without insignias took control of key government and strategic sites across the Ukrainian territory of Crimea, after months of bloody protests in Kiev’s Maidan Square led to the overthrow of Viktor Yanukovych’s pro-Russian government.

A controversial independence referendum — widely regarded as illegitimate by the majority of the international community — was held on March 16. Crimea’s predominantly ethnic Russian population voted to join Russia, and the Russian Federation claimed the peninsula two days later.

Dissent not tolerated

Not all Crimeans are so thrilled.

“After the elections, the repressions against my people are going to get even worse,” said Erfan Kudusov, 49, one of tens of thousands of ethnic Crimean Tatars who fled their homeland after the Russian annexation.

Mr Kudusov founded the Crimean Republican Organisation of the “Ukrainian Association of Patriots” in December 2017 in Kiev.

Their reports show any small protest against Russian authorities is punishable by hefty fines and imprisonment in overcrowded cells. Reports of police brutality and the denial of food and water are common.

In one case, a man posting “anti-Russian” comments on the internet was sentenced to two-and-a-half years prison for “incitement of hatred”. In another, a Crimean Tatar was accused of making “a public appeal to action aimed at violating the territorial integrity of the Russian Federation” after writing “Crimea is Ukraine” on social media.

Even individuals holding “single-person pickets” in Crimean towns are fined for “participation in unauthorised public action”.

Mr Kudusov’s family remains in Crimea. Despite the difficulties, his relatives “don’t want to leave their homes, jobs and most importantly, their homeland”.

“There is constant discrimination against my people,” said Mr Kudusov, who now runs an art gallery in Kiev.

“They only get work when there is no one else to take a job, our language is no longer taught in schools, and state institutions and courts no longer accept documents in our language. And all around us the Russian population is being set against us.”

Pressure over vote

Less than 1 per cent of Crimea’s 250,000 strong Crimean Tatar population voted in the 2014 independence referendum.

Mr Kudusov said none of his extended family — some 400 to 500 people — intended to vote in the 2018 presidential election.

He described multiple instances of Crimean Tatars being threatened with dismissal from their jobs if they didn’t vote, in particular “doctors, university lecturers and teachers who work in the government or municipal systems”.

“[Federal Security Service] agents are putting extreme pressure on Crimean Tatars and intimidating them to force them to vote,” said Ayder Muzhdabaev, deputy general director of the Crimean-language TV channel ATR.

“The authorities need images for television to demonstrate that Crimean Tatars support them, when in actual fact they don’t want to vote in the elections of the occupying authorities.”

A turbulent history

Relations between the Crimean Tatars and Russia have always been turbulent.

Empress Catherine the Great annexed the strategically important peninsula from the Ottomans into the Russian Empire in 1783.

A century and a half later, the entire population of 190,000 Crimean Tatars was deported to Uzbekistan on the orders of Joseph Stalin. Accused of collaborating with the Nazis, more than 40 per cent died en route or during their exile.

Hundreds of thousands of ethnic Russians moved into Soviet Crimea, including a large contingent of military, KGB officers and their families. The temperate climate and exotic palms also made Crimea a sought-after holiday destination for the Soviet elite.

The exact number of Crimean Tatars who have left since the annexation is unknown.

“Many still have relatives in Crimea and don’t want authorities to know they have left in case the [Federal Security Service] goes to their relatives and makes trouble for them,” Mr Muzhdabaev said.

Mr Kudusov said he feared the situation would worsen dramatically after Sunday’s election.

“Many more will have to leave. There will be more pressure on business owners — more checks by the tax police, fire inspectors, secret services and others,” he said. “The Russian authorities don’t want disloyal people, and 99 per cent of Crimean Tatars are disloyal to the occupiers.”

Ethnic Ukrainians in Crimea are also marginalised. Schools teaching in the Ukrainian language have been closed and many Ukrainians have been forced to move to the mainland

International community responds

On December 19, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution condemning “violations, abuses, measures and practices of discrimination against the residents of the temporarily occupied Crimea, including Crimean Tatars … by the Russian occupation authorities.”

Kremlin spokesman Dimitry Peskov strongly denied the accusations.

Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and other prominent rights organisations have also condemned Russia’s actions in Crimea.

In a statement on Twitter on March 13, Britain’s ambassador to Ukraine called for the immediate release and return of all Ukrainian political prisoners currently held in Russian territory.

“Russia continues to violate international law”, he wrote, using the hashtag “Crimea is Ukraine”.

Mr Muzhdabaev said Western sanctions were a positive step, but ultimately had “a minimal effect on Putin’s regime”.

“There is no strong reaction like there was when the USSR invaded Afghanistan. And I think this gives Putin the sense that he can continue to interfere and nothing will happen to him,” he said.