BRENDAN EICH (pictured) is a computer and Internet pioneer. The Web sites that host this radio program use technology that he created. He is a co-founder — and, until a few days ago, the CEO — of Mozilla, the open-source giant that brought us Thunderbird and Firefox among other things. He invented the Javascript programming language. But Brendan Eich was forced to step down as CEO of Mozilla because six years ago he gave $1,000 to a group that opposed homosexual “marriage.” His appointment as CEO brought down a firestorm of abuse and demands for his resignation. He had violated the inverted moral code that the Jewish power structure has imposed upon us: He dared to oppose the redefinition of marriage so as to include homosexual unions.

Now Eich wasn’t really all that daring. He didn’t actually oppose, or even criticize, homosexuality. He emphasized more than once Mozilla’s total commitment to “diversity” and the aggressive inclusion of homosexuals and non-Whites in his company’s work force. But for the sin of having a slightly more moderate view than the most radical of egalitarians, Eich had to go. The painfully grovelling press release from Mozilla about his resignation reminds me of some Communist apparatchik’s convoluted theoretical justification for the “disappearance” of a former colleague who deviated a bit too much from the latest party line, written with abject subservience to the Inner Party in hopes that he will be spared the same fate.

Though the immediate issue was homosexual marriage, let’s be honest here: If Eich had opposed any major plank of the Jewish / cultural Marxist agenda, he would have just as surely been fired. Imagine if Eich had supported an anti-feminist group. Imagine if Eich had given a thousand dollars to a group opposing interracial marriage. Imagine if he had helped fund a study that showed intelligence differences between the races. Imagine if he’d given that grand to the National Alliance. There would have been exactly the same outcome.

What is this Jewish agenda? If you ask the Jewish groups, they’ll tell you there isn’t one. They’ll say that they just are on the side of the good folks of all races who believe in equality — who believe that men and women are, or ought to be, equal in all ways; who believe that the races are equal, or ought to be; who believe that people who want to have sex with members of the same sex, or who imagine that they are another sex from the one they were born into, are equal to normal men and women; and who believe that making any distinctions between the races, or between men and women, or between sexual perverts and normal people, is “morally wrong.”

That’s pretty much how they’d present it themselves, though they’d deny there was anything particularly Jewish about it. And, even though the leading intellectual force behind each of these egalitarian positions was and is Jewish, they do have a point. Even if the Jews were taken away tomorrow morning by alien saucers, never again to return to the Earth, the inverted morality and quasi-religion of “equality” that they’ve created has taken on a life of its own. It’s endemic among our people. They’ve managed to impose this “morality” on the media, on the church, on the government, and on every level of the educational establishment. Even though they’re trying to kill us by doing this, I have to admit it’s an awe-inspiring accomplishment.

I think we can summarize this Jewish-imposed morality, the morality that informs their agenda from “feminism” to multiculturalism to “gay rights,” and all the rest, in one simple “moral” principle: “Whatever tends to bring more White children into the world is evil; whatever prevents White children from coming into the world is good.”

If you are in a position of any power or influence, and you oppose any element of this Jewish agenda, there will be punishment. There will be an effort to strip you of your titles, power, influence, and reputation. Look at what happened to James Watson, the co-discoverer of DNA, for God’s sake — stripped of his position at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory because he said out loud what every honest scientist knows: that the intelligence of Africans is not equal to that of other races. Look at what happened to the co-inventor of the transistor, William Shockley, viciously and unrelentingly attacked in the media for the last two decades of his life because he dedicated those years to promoting the advancement of the race — a task which he considered even more important than anything he had done before.

“To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?”

Since that time, my statement, sometimes an exact quote but more often a paraphrase, has become the stuff of Internet memes, quote collections, graphics, and motivational posters. There are over 926,000 entries for one variation of it alone on Google search. Trouble is, the quote is almost always attributed to the 18th-century French writer Voltaire, and not to me.

Voltaire never said this.

Looking at online archives, not only of Web pages but of digitized books going back centuries, we find that — except for my use of the statement starting with my 1993 American Dissident Voices broadcast — it does not appear in large numbers until 2012 and not at all before 2007. Even a Jewish scholar, Barry Popik, thoroughly debunked the Voltaire connection in 2012, just as the quote was “going viral.” So it’s pretty clear, even to my critics, that I came up with the idea and the quote — and Voltaire never did.

Now, it’s kind of flattering for my thoughts to be put over the name of the man who said such witty things as “To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered.”

Voltaire

Additionally, Voltaire once wrote to the King of Prussia urging him to abolish Christianity in his domains, saying that it “is assuredly the most ridiculous, the most absurd, and the most bloody religion which has ever infected the world. Your Majesty will do the human race an eternal service by eliminating this infamous superstition… My one regret in dying is that I cannot aid you in this noble enterprise, the finest and most respectable which the human mind can inspire.”

Voltaire also rightly regarded the human races as vastly different — and he said that Jews “spread an irreconcilable hatred against all nations.”

Well put, and not much to disagree with! So, though I’d like to receive credit for my own work, and though I certainly don’t ever compare myself to him, it certainly lessens the sting of the misattribution when I am backhandedly equated with Monsieur Voltaire.

But there’s a lesson here.

Whoever hijacked my quote and put it over Voltaire’s signature liked what I was saying. He understood my point. He understood that our secret rulers brook no criticism of themselves or their agenda — without exacting punishment. He wanted to use the quote. But he didn’t dare attribute it correctly. He didn’t dare make his point with a quote from a known “racist” or “anti-Semite,” no matter how good the quote was. He didn’t dare follow my thoughts with my name. If he did, he’d be attacked as being “racist” himself. There might be personal or professional consequences.

So he took my idea and put in the mouth of Voltaire. Funny thing is, Voltaire, free-thinker and honest observer as he was, is as much of a “racist” and “anti-Semite” as I am. But Voltaire has been safely dead for well over 200 years and his contribution to the artistic and intellectual development of our civilization is so great that it will take quite some time for his legacy to be erased, denounced, or censored (as I am sure the Enemies of Life are aching to do). So it was relatively “safe” to quote Voltaire, but unsafe to quote Kevin Alfred Strom.

In a way, this misattribution proves my point. Here’s the full quote from my radio program:

Not Voltaire. (Kevin Alfred Strom)

“To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize? We all know who it is that we are not permitted to criticize. We all know who it is that it is a sin to criticize. Sodomy is no longer a sin in America. Treason, and burning and spitting and urinating on the American flag is no longer a sin in America. Gross desecration of Catholic or Protestant religious symbols is no longer a sin in America. Cop-killing is no longer a sin in America — it is celebrated in rap ‘music.’ The degradation of beautiful young girls in disgusting pornography is no longer a sin in America. The killing by the multiple millions of the next generation in the womb is no longer a sin in America. But ‘anti-Semitism’ is the ultimate sin in America. But as things get worse and worse, we are losing our fear of this silly word. We all know who it is that controls the wealth of our nation through their exchanges and counting-houses in New York. We all know who it is that has deformed the minds of two generations of Americans with their television programs.”

Today, even more than in 1993, it is evident that we in occupied America no longer have freedom of speech. It is a “sin” according to the Powers That Be to criticize Jewish power — or even to point out the fact that it exists. It is also a “sin” to oppose or criticize the Jewish agenda, a sin that sometimes has serious personal and professional consequences. Brendan Eich spent almost his entire professional career toeing the Jewish line on all these issues. Hell, he’s still toeing it today. He made just one minor misstep — and he was cast down almost instantly from his position of power and influence.

And who, exactly, cast him down? One of the leading factors in the anti-Eich campaign was the aggressive reaction of online dating Web site OkCupid. Shortly after Eich’s appointment as CEO, the hundreds of thousands of visitors to the OkCupid site who used Mozilla Firefox as their browser had their logins interrupted and the following message was displayed on their screens:

“Hello there, Mozilla Firefox user. Pardon this interruption of your OkCupid experience. Mozilla’s new CEO, Brendan Eich, is an opponent of equal rights for gay couples. We would therefore prefer that our users not use Mozilla software to access OkCupid. Politics is normally not the business of a website, and we all know there’s a lot more wrong with the world than misguided CEOs. So you might wonder why we’re asserting ourselves today. This is why: we’ve devoted the last ten years to bringing people—all people—together. If individuals like Mr. Eich had their way, then roughly 8% of the relationships we’ve worked so hard to bring about would be illegal. Equality for gay relationships is personally important to many of us here at OkCupid. But it’s professionally important to the entire company. OkCupid is for creating love. Those who seek to deny love and instead enforce misery, shame, and frustration are our enemies, and we wish them nothing but failure. If you want to keep using Firefox, the link at the bottom will take you through to the site. However, we urge you to consider different software for accessing OkCupid.”

OkCupid, by the way, also heavily promotes interracial relationships, and even berates its own users about how “racist” they are when it comes to sex and romance. And who controls OkCupid? No surprise there: OkCupid is owned by the (very Jewish) Barry Diller’s InterActive Corporation, which fired its own Director of Corporate Communications, Justine Sacco, when she jokingly tweeted that she hoped that, as a White woman, she wouldn’t get infected with AIDS during an upcoming trip to Africa. InterActive also owns Match.com (which also promotes homosexuality and interracial sex), Dictionary.com, Ask.com, About.com, Vimeo, The Daily Beast, and other significant media properties.

William Saletan, a Jewish writer at Slate.com, went even further. He’s not satisfied with the head of Brendan Eich, he says. He wants everyone who opposes gay marriage fired. Many have taken his remarks as ironic. But are they? Is Saletan’s proposal much different from what happens these days to those of high or low estate who question racial equality or point out Jewish supremacism, much more than yet another step toward legal persecution of any who question the “equality” faith? Saletan wrote yesterday:

“Some of my colleagues are celebrating. They call Eich a bigot who got what he deserved. I agree. But let’s not stop here. If we’re serious about enforcing the new standard, thousands of other employees who donated to the same anti-gay ballot measure must be punished. More than 35,000 people gave money to the campaign for Proposition 8, the 2008 ballot measure that declared, ‘Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.’”

Saletan goes on to say that donations to referenda organizers are public records in the state, recorded by name, address, amount of donation — and employer. So these people can be found — found and hurt. They can be fired, and he advocates that they should be fired if they oppose Saletan’s view of sexual morality, saying:

“Why do these bigots still have jobs? Let’s go get them.”

Saletan, who calls himself a liberal Republican, is also, no surprise, a strong supporter of interracial as well as homosexual unions.

One technique used by exterminators and those trying to eradicate certain species of insects or other animals is to introduce substances or genetically modified organisms into the target’s environment that interrupt the normal sexual and reproductive behavior of that target species. This could be the artificial creation and introduction of sterile males or females, or the spreading of chemicals with a contraceptive effect, the introduction of pheromones so the males mistake other males for females, or other means of getting the target’s birth rate down. You don’t have to get the birth rate down to zero. All you need to do is nudge it below replacement level, and the target population is doomed. Is it too much of an exaggeration to suggest that this is exactly what is being done to us?

“To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?” Those who have taken over the leading positions in our society are leading us to the slaughterhouse.

If we are to survive as a people, we need to rule ourselves again. We need our own society. We need living space and a government that are ours alone. We need a new morality, one in which our survival and advancement are sacred, inviolable values. To bring together those who believe in this purpose, a purpose which cannot be compromised, and to make that purpose the meaning of our society and of our lives on Earth, is the mission of the National Alliance. Please join us today.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the new National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: “Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.”

Very interesting. I didn’t know any of this, but it’s hardly surprising. History shows that Jews have long sought to gain control of all mass media and have largely succeeded in doing so. It stands to reason that control of the Internet would be their current objective, particularly since the Net currently the only genuinely free medium in existence.

In 1996 the publication “Who Rules America?” enlightened me about why the visual and print media showed the biases that they do. However, I think it is time for a new publication, one that documents the extent of Jewish control of cyberspace. Your revelations regarding Interactive Corporation are a good first step, but I think a more comprehensive report is needed, one that can be accessed online and updated as necessary. After all, websites don’t come with a Jewish-ownership advisory warning.