Has Ted Thompson gone off course?

I know it's risky because your MULTI-TITLES say NFL COMMISH and SUPER MODERATOR, but here's the thing:
You go to the Packers official website, and on the roster page you see each player, and it says "HOW ACQUIRED".

If you can't admit that there's a big difference in those two legal methods of assembling a roster, then we have nothing more in this thread to discuss and there's no point in reading the original article linked in the OP.

Cliff, Tauch and Nick WERE FREE AGENTS...in 2006 on March 12th free agency was starting..Kampman was signed at something like 9pm on March 11th, so like 3 hours before free agency started Ted re-signed Kamp

How does that imblish the truth? or how is that a LIE?

Who the HELL cares who drafted a player??? If the Pack decided that a guy is worth a contract they will go after him..So stop bringing that up....

so when the Packers site says they were free agents you say they are wrong..
but when it says how acquired you are only go by what the Packers site says next to their name on the roster?
then I know where your coming from, you only use a source if it supports your argument..But if it proves you wrong you wont acknowledge it

Click to expand...

You know what I am talking about here, but you want to argue just for the sake of arguing, which is fine, no worries mate.

I am talking about ways of assembling a roster.
As everyone in the NFL Community knows, Ted Thompson lives & dies by the NFL Draft moreso than any other GM.

We saw many other GMs and scouts and pundits say as much back in April.

He also utilized free agency to acquire Charles Woodson, Ryan Pickett, and Brandon Chillar. He also added free agents like Frank Walker, who I thought was a decent addition, and who has stuck with the Ravens after we let him go.

Some would say he's not aggressive enough in free agency, which is what the original article states and I believe what LeRoy Butler mentioned.

Ted prefers to build through the draft, which is a pretty good idea (and sometimes that means re-signing the current players before or after their original contract expires, which sometimes technically means they were considered "free agents" for a limited duration of time.
He just needs to fill a hole or two via U or R free agency, as Ron Wolf did. This is pointed out in the original article.

I tend to concur with that sentiment. I think most knowledgable Packer fans agree with that. Many, however, just give TT the benefit of the doubt because he is the GM.

The problem is I have seen many GMs and many corporate CEO's lead their company/team to mediocrity, or to failure, yet their followers just marched to the man's drumroll along the way, assuming he knows best because he is, afterall, the man in charge.

Just dont be daft and say Cliff, Mark, Collins were not free agents.
that is my only beef

Click to expand...

Of course. If the GM lets their contracts expire, then they become restricted or unrestricted free agents. That's how it works.
I'm talking about the methods available, the tools if you will, to assemble and add talent to a roster, from another team.
Such as the Vikings adding/stealing away: Ryan Longwell, Steve Hutchinson, Pat Williams, Antoine Winfield, Darren Sharper, Madieu Williams, Jared Allen (trade), Brett Favre, Bernard Berrian, Visanthe Shiancoe, or the Saints with Drew Brees, Darren Sharper, Jonathon Vilma, etc.

We all know, and were reminded of it last month during the draft, that our guy is the guy who relies on the draft more than any other GM year-in, year-out. He freely admits as such. And it's critical to draft well, obviously. But it's even more critical when you put 97% of your eggs in the "draft basket".

The misnomer we have, however, is that Ted Thompson is the king of the draft.
I have pointed out we have a lot of good players thanks to hiim drafting them.

But his draft track record is certainly not "elite".

In fact, not sure if anyone here reads the USA Today or not (if you travel and stay in hotels, you probably do). But here is a nice piece on this:

Of course. If the GM lets their contracts expire, then they become restricted or unrestricted free agents. That's how it works.
I'm talking about the methods available, the tools if you will, to assemble and add talent to a roster, from another team.
Such as the Vikings adding/stealing away: Ryan Longwell, Steve Hutchinson, Pat Williams, Antoine Winfield, Darren Sharper, Madieu Williams, Jared Allen (trade), Brett Favre, Bernard Berrian, Visanthe Shiancoe, or the Saints with Drew Brees, Darren Sharper, Jonathon Vilma, etc.

We all know, and were reminded of it last month during the draft, that our guy is the guy who relies on the draft more than any other GM year-in, year-out. He freely admits as such. And it's critical to draft well, obviously. But it's even more critical when you put 97% of your eggs in the "draft basket".

The misnomer we have, however, is that Ted Thompson is the king of the draft.
I have pointed out we have a lot of good players thanks to hiim drafting them.

But his draft track record is certainly not "elite".

In fact, not sure if anyone here reads the USA Today or not (if you travel and stay in hotels, you probably do). But here is a nice piece on this:

And Clifton, Tauscher and Collins could have signed anywhere but he came back and signed with us.

Click to expand...

Right, which is the case in the majority of cases with starting players.
Stealing someone else's starters, to fix your own weaknesses, is sometimes a double-coup, as we have seen with the Grape Apes getting Sharper and Longwell from us, Jared Allen from Kansas City, Antoine Winfield and Pat Williams from Buffalo, Steve Hutchinson from Seattle, and Bernard Berrian from Chicago. All those players have made the Viqueens a better football team
But they also hurt the teams who lost those players.

So Thompson doesn't get credit for not letting other teams do that with players like Clifton, Tauscher, Kampman, Pickett, Collins, Jennings, etc?

Click to expand...

Sure he does. That's why he's ranked #12 on that list from USA Today.
If you're grading on a curve, that's about a B/B- I reckon, and his playoff record is about on par with that, so seems fair to me.

BTW, of those players you mentioned above, he drafted 2 of them, and he did let Kampman get away for nothing when many people, fans, writers locally and nationally said they should trade him last year and get a pick or player for him. So if you think he did well with Kampman and the 3-4 switch, well I think that was one of his strikeouts. But maybe Kampman wasn't worth anything back a year ago? I thought he had value. To a 4-3 team.

Bush is not kept on the roster for his cornerbacking skills. I don't know why he's still around but I'd rather have Bush than Jones. At least Bush doesn't have run-ins with the law. If Pacman can wear out his welcome with Jerry Jones I sure don't want him polluting the lockerroom at 1265! :skull:

I'm honestly not sure how you can say TT has done a great job, other than the homer-angle.

I have seen a Sporting News breakdown of the past 3 drafts, and posted this USA Today one which ranks all the GMs who have conducted 3-5 drafts for their team, and they rank TT #12 overall. Now that's unbiased, and that's up to this point.

#12 is not "great". It's better than average, or good. Not great.

Again, TT's team in over a half-decade has one single playoff game win. One. That's not great. That's average.
In 5 full seasons, there are 60 playoff births, and 32 teams. We have a win. The Jets and Rex Ryan picked up 2 last season, with a brand new QB and brand new coach.

The Vikings came within a whisker of a Super Bowl birth with a brand new QB, and anchored by a bunch of guys who they never drafted, from Pro Bowler's Jared Allen to Steve Hutchinson to Antoine Winfield to PHat Williams.

So honestly, are you under the belief that, as you stated, TT has done a great job?
That's great to you? To me, it's pretty good.
What is a Super Bowl birth? A Super Bowl win? Two Super Bowl wins (all over 5 years?) I would reserve "great" or "fantastic" for something along those lines.

And yes, I lived thru the horrible 70's and 80's for the Packers. That's Lions/Clippers type horrible. But I loved Lofton & Jefferson!

I'm honestly not sure how you can say TT has done a great job, other than the homer-angle.

I have seen a Sporting News breakdown of the past 3 drafts, and posted this USA Today one which ranks all the GMs who have conducted 3-5 drafts for their team, and they rank TT #12 overall. Now that's unbiased, and that's up to this point.

#12 is not "great". It's better than average, or good. Not great.

Again, TT's team in over a half-decade has one single playoff game win. One. That's not great. That's average.
In 5 full seasons, there are 60 playoff births, and 32 teams. We have a win. The Jets and Rex Ryan picked up 2 last season, with a brand new QB and brand new coach.

The Vikings came within a whisker of a Super Bowl birth with a brand new QB, and anchored by a bunch of guys who they never drafted, from Pro Bowler's Jared Allen to Steve Hutchinson to Antoine Winfield to PHat Williams.

So honestly, are you under the belief that, as you stated, TT has done a great job?
That's great to you? To me, it's pretty good.
What is a Super Bowl birth? A Super Bowl win? Two Super Bowl wins (all over 5 years?) I would reserve "great" or "fantastic" for something along those lines.

And yes, I lived thru the horrible 70's and 80's for the Packers. That's Lions/Clippers type horrible. But I loved Lofton & Jefferson!

Click to expand...

To the BOD, yes.

That's all that matters. You can discuss all you want.

Like I said, the BOD's goal is to have a contending team. He has accomplished that, despite only winning 1 playoff game.

To the fans, and to the Board in a longer period of time, is to win the SB.

So discussing semantics of what's great and what's very good or above average doesn't matter.