Seniors Angered Over Talk Of Pension Cuts, NDP MP Says

CBC

Posted:
01/30/2012 12:43 pm EST
Updated:
03/31/2012 5:12 am EDT

NDP caucus chair Peter Julian said the party is ready to fight the government on pensions and other issues over the next few months. He said the government didn't campaign on cutting or changing OAS in the last election, less than a year ago, and that it has to consider public opinion. (CP) | CP

The government isn't going to cut Old Age Security but will take a look at the "challenges" facing the retirement income system, Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Monday.

Other ministers in the government, however, specified there wouldn't be cuts for anyone currently receiving OAS.

In the first question period since MPs left in December — and his first comments since suggesting last week there could be changes to Canada's retirement income system — Harper said there would be no cuts to the OAS.

"We will ensure our vital programs are sustainable in the long-term and for future generations," Harper said.

"The reality is that we aren’t cutting programs for seniors."

Last week in a speech in Davos, Switzerland, Prime Minister Stephen Harper hinted at possible changes to Old Age Security benefits. The ratio of workers to retired people will decline from four to one to two to one by 2030, leaving fewer people to fund OAS through their taxes.

In the speech, Harper said Canada's "demographics also constitute a threat to the social programs and services that Canadians cherish," but the Canada Pension Plan is fully funded and doesn't need to be changed.

"We have already taken steps to limit the growth of our health-care spending over that period," he said. "We must do the same for our retirement income system."

"For those elements of the system that are not funded, we will make the changes necessary to ensure sustainability for the next generation while not affecting current recipients."

Confusion over possibility of cuts

The brief mention about retirement income in Harper's speech left opposition parties speculating on what it could mean.

Opposition parties seized on the issue in question period Monday. They also took advantage of a scheduled debate on pooled registered retirement plans to rail against potential cuts.

Interim Liberal Leader Bob Rae said Harper has always promised not to cut transfers to the provinces or to people.

"It's a politics of abandonment because he's abandoning future generations of seniors, he's abandoning provinces with respect to their increased obligations, and let's not forget the fact that the majority of people on OAS, plus Guaranteed Income Supplement, are making less than $25,000 a year," Rae said.

"This is a direct statement saying that the future of this country is going to involve ... a bigger gap between rich and poor."

Earlier in the day, NDP caucus chair Peter Julian reminded Conservatives about the voting power of seniors.

Julian said the party is ready to fight the government on pensions and other issues over the next few months. He said the government didn't campaign on cutting or changing OAS in the last election, less than a year ago, and that it has to consider public opinion. Julian said seniors in his riding told him over the weekend they'd never vote Conservative again if they cut retirement income.

"For the Conservatives to say, 'we just don't care about public opinion for the next few years,' I think would be a primary mistake. I don't think they're that stupid," Julian said.

"Our job is to make sure that Canadians are aware that their points of view are being represented in the House of Commons," he said.

More seniors and middle-aged Canadians consistently turn out to vote in elections than younger Canadians.

"All seniors should rest assured those that are collecting OAS today will continue to collect it without any change. Our focus is on the medium- and the long-term and ensuring the sustainability of the system for 10 years, 20 years, 30 years from now," government House leader Peter Van Loan said Monday.

"For those who are retired today or approaching retirement, they can rest assured there will be no changes that will affect their benefits."

Greek problems cited

Van Loan said Canada needs to make changes now or risk an unstable economy.

"If you want to know what the consequences are, you only need to look to Greece," he said.

But Yanis Varoufakis, a professor of economics at the University of Athens, said that is "spectacularly wrong."

In an interview last week with the CBC's James Fitz-Morris, Varoufakis said if that was right, Germany should have serious sovereign debt problems and Ireland shouldn’t, but the reverse is true.

"The problem in Europe is not debt. Debt is a symptom," he said.

all-related-on-huffpost

Close



Parliament Resumes Things to Watch

of





Here's a look at some of the storylines and hot-button issues expected to set the tone for Parliament over the coming months. (CP)
With files from CBC

The next budget will be unlike any other delivered by Finance Minister Jim Flaherty. For one, it's the first time the Conservatives have a majority and don't need to consider opposition demands in order to pass the budget.
They have freer rein to put in -- and, more importantly this time -- take out what they want.
Which brings us to the second reason this budget is one for the record books: it will contain plans to cut billions of dollars from Ottawa's spending, the results of the government-wide spending review announced in the last budget.
Departments were asked to find savings of between five and 10 per cent to ultimately reach $4 billion in annual savings. Treasury Board President Tony Clement, the minister in charge of the review, hinted in a speech last week the cuts could be deeper than originally anticipated.
Public servants are bracing for the axe to fall, Canadians are wondering what services will be affected and labour unions and the opposition parties are readying their battle lines, promising to fight the cuts.
And, while it may not come in this budget, Prime Minister Stephen Harper told an audience at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland last week that his government will also be taking a close look at retirement costs in Canada, including Old Age Security.
The date for budget has not yet been announced. (Flickr: Brittgow)

The NDP leadership race has moved into high gear, as the eight candidates face off in debates about every two weeks until the party's leadership convention March 24.
Interim leader Nycole Turmel has two months left sitting across from Harper in the House of Commons, and the choice of person to take her seat will affect the dynamics of the place.
Will it be political veteran Thomas Mulcair or 29-year-old Niki Ashton? An MP such as Nathan Cullen, Peggy Nash, Romeo Saganash or Paul Dewar -- or will the party elect a leader without a seat in the Commons, such as Brian Topp or Martin Singh?
And on the other interim leadership front, the Liberals' Bob Rae is sure to keep facing questions about his intentions. The Liberals held a well-attended policy convention in January and leadership was a hot topic there. (CP)

First Nations chiefs from across Canada came to Ottawa Jan. 24 to meet with Harper and other government officials. There was no big deal, no major announcement at the end of the day, but there were declarations about renewing the relationship, removing barriers to self-governance and working together to improve education and economic development.
People will be watching to see if there's anything significant in the budget for aboriginal Canadians and what, if anything, will be announced in the coming months to follow through on the meeting.
Attawapiskat in northern Ontario, meanwhile, continues to battle the federal government over the third-party management issue that developed late last year and that is an ongoing story that MPs will be dealing with in the coming weeks. (CP)

There is some high-profile leftover legislation that has yet to be passed into law. Namely, C-10, the omnibus crime bill known as the Safe Streets and Communities Act.
"The crime bill is already in the Senate, we expect that they should deal with it relatively soon," Conservative House Leader Peter Van Loan told CBC News. "There might be amendments that come back to the House, we'll take care of them. "
The back story on the amendments is that Liberal Irwin Cotler tried to introduce them at the committee stage in the fall, the Conservatives rejected them -- and then tried to introduce virtually the same ones at the bill's next stage. The attempt was denied on a technicality, so it is expected the government will try to make the changes in the Senate.
Meanwhile other priority bills are still making their way through the Commons, including the bill to end the long-gun registry and a copyright reform bill, which has been languishing at first reading for some time.
The first piece of legislation on the agenda Monday is a bill to create a pooled registered pension plan. (Alamy)

Two big issues -- health-care funding and the cost of crime legislation -- are getting in the way of harmonious federal-provincial relations these days. Quebec has flatly said it won't pay for extra costs associated with the expected increase in prisoners due to the omnibus crime bill and it wants everyone to sit down to hash out the dollar details.
"If anyone thinks that this debate is somehow over even when [Bill C-10 is] approved by parliament, they are sadly mistaken," interim Liberal Leader Bob Rae told CBC News on Sunday.
On the health file, the provinces were dealt a blow when the government made it clear in December that negotiating a new post-2014 funding deal was not in the cards and they would have to take what the federal government offered, or leave it. Again, the provinces are asking to sit down and talk.
The federal government has shown little interest, however, on doing any talking on either file. Can you say "stalemate"? (CP)

The U.S. government rejected the proposed Keystone XL pipeline project while MPs were on their break, but hearings into the Northern Gateway pipeline hearings are going on ... and on ... and on -- or so says the government.
Prime Minister Harper and Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver have made no secret of the fact they plan to change the environmental assessment process so projects can get approved faster. Oliver has referred to groups that oppose oil sands development as "radicals," a term that will probably be thrown around a lot in the coming months, as Harper's team takes a more aggressive approach on projects deemed economically significant. (Althia Raj)

The trade agenda is expected to be a rather busy one in the coming months.
The Canada-EU trade deal is still unfinished business. The original goal to have it signed, sealed and delivered in 2011 was not met, but both sides say they are committed to wrapping up negotiations in 2012.
Harper has also made it clear he intends to be a salesman for Canada's oil and energy sector, particularly in Asia. He's openly talked about finding alternative customers to the United States and to that end, he's heading to China next month for his second visit.
Trade-watchers will also be looking to see if there is any movement on Canada's bid to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Harper said in November he wants in on the talks toward a new Pacific-Rim trade pact, but there hasn't been much talk about it since.