Sunday, 29 July 2012

Talk of the Olympics is everywhere, so I thought I'd jump on the bandwagon with a piece I wrote whilst on work experience at the Hampstead and Highgate Express about how London's canal boat dwellers are the latest community to suffer as a result of it. Underneath is the original piece, the edited version is shorter and has a slightly different slant. I've linked it here.

Canal boat residents have raised their anger over the effect of restriction zones put in place for the Olympic Games.

A restriction zone of 15 miles has been implemented around
the Olympic Park area, stretching from Little Venice to Lea Bridge Road in Lea valley and the LimehouseBasin in the south.

The restriction zone means that boat owners within the area
who are classified as ‘continuous cruisers’, those without a permanent home
mooring, will have to either pay to stay or relocate for the 10 week duration
of the Games from the 3rd July.

Continuous cruisers are legally permitted to stay in any one
area for 14 days. However, this is often overlooked by British Waterways, the
agency that deals with canal boat matters, if the owners do not cause any
trouble.This means that canal boat residents can sometimes stay in one
area for months at a time.

Boat owners with permanent moorings within the area will be
exempt from the Olympic restrictions.

The cost of a designated Olympic mooring site will cost
in-between £50-£350 per week whilst £36 per week ‘summer mooring’ permits have
also been issued on a first-come-first-served basis for any free spots within
the controlled zone.

Whilst 94 people have taken the designated mooring option
and a further 100 have requested to stay within the Olympic mooring zone it is
estimated that 176 boat owners will move to avoid the charges into the buffet
area outside of Little Venice.

Boat owners in the Regents Canal area are worried about the
effect of people being forcibly moved from their current homes.

Jasper Rolfe, 22, a student who owns one of the house boats,
said:

“There’s a lot of dislike amongst boat owners about being
asked to leave for the Olympics. I don’t think the welfare of the people on the
house boats is being taken into adequate consideration. We won’t be allowed to
move back to the area for 10 weeks which obviously could affect people in terms
of in the area their jobs, hospitals and education for their children. It’s a
terrible inconvenience and plus it’s going to create a massive backlog along
the canal as people try find somewhere new to moor outside the Olympic
exclusion zone, it’s just pants for the people, really.”

British Waterways have also been contacted by the owners of
boats that nesting birds have made their home. As it is illegal in the UK to disturb
nesting birds they fear they may risk falling foul of the law if they have to
move their vessel in time for the Olympics period. The agency has made special
provisions in connection with Natural England for anyone affected to have their
stay extended to the 12th July by which time they believe that any
active nests will be fully fledged. Currently four boats on the RegentsCanal have been granted additional stay
on these grounds.

Joe Coggins from the Canal & River Trust has defended
the decision to implement additional mooring costs during the Olympics.

He
said: “The income from Olympic moorings will be used
to cover the additional staff resource required for the course of the Games,
and to improve facilities and infrastructure in the area.

“We have recognised, through consultation with stakeholder
groups and boaters, that the Games are going to cause disruption for local
boaters, and we want to minimise this. We have been working with them to
find a solution that strikes a balance between their needs and lifestyles and
the wider requirements of the Olympics.”

For the last four years I've worked part time as a care assistant
in residential and nursing homes across Leeds and Manchester, initially because
a town near where I went to high school is a haven for Yorkshire's elderly.
Although maybe not the most obvious job choice for a teenager, I still found
the work to be a generally rewarding experience. However after four years of
low pay and sometimes tough working conditions ,especially at my latest job in a
nursing home in Manchester, I see no
reason for us to continue to accept the unjust conditions we are subjected to
as care workers.

As the
UK’s population ages care work is becoming an ever increasingly expanding and
crucial part of the British economy. Yet the wages paid to its staff continue
to be amongst the lowest in the country and working conditions remain tough.
Out of the four homes I've worked for, only one paid more than minimum wage
(£7.20 ph) and that was in Ilkley, one of Yorkshire's richest towns.

So in that way it's not surprising that at my current
care home in Manchester all care staff are paid minimum wage. To me £6.08
for any job is poles apart from a living wage in the UK when you factor in the
price of living, bills and childcare. That those who work in care; one of the
highest risk sectors both for staff and their clients with a comparatively
large amount of staff responsibility get this is incredible.

The standard shift length for carers at the home I work in is 12
hours, with a total one hour's unpaid break split into two 15 minute and one
half hour periods. For the remaining 11 hours it is rare that we get to sit
down for more than a couple of minutes at a time, it not being uncommon to
spend the entire shift on our feet. There are around 30 residents at the home,
the vast majority requiring some form of nursing care which includes helping
them get up in the mornings and assisting to bed at night. In between those
times they require care throughout the day, whether that's helping with eating
at mealtimes, when going to the toilet or monitoring in general. Just under
half are in wheelchairs which means that they need hoisting each time we move
them, a crucial measure which places our far too small workforce under added
pressure to get residents into the dining room in time for their meals. Most of
the residents also have some signs of dementia which means that staff must
constantly be alert and responsive to any potential risks to the patients as
well as ensuring that someone is there to reassure them if they get anxious.

There are only ever four care staff
present for each shift to care for all the residents in these ways. Alongside the
home's understaffing, our low pay, overwork and consequential fatigue our
knowledge that any ill-thought out action by ourselves could result in injury
and potential death to both the resident and staff adds to our daily pressures.

Sick leave, which is common in homes like mine due to the risks
that come with a job spent mostly on your feet and dealing with sometimes heavy
loads, is another area of worry always at the back of our minds. Despite the
increased potential for injury due to unsatisfactory working conditions
sanctioned by management the onus is placed firmly on the employee and not
employer to ensure their own safety. Being granted only the statutory sick pay rate
of £86 per week means that sometimes staff will continue to try work when they
really should be recovering due to being unable to afford to survive on such a
miniscule amount of money. This is the thanks we get for taking on a tough,
high-risk job.

As someone who can afford to live off a part-time
salary, I'm incredibly lucky compared to most of my colleagues. Several of the
staff work around four shifts per week, that's 48 hours, for a £267.52 weekly
wage that barely supports themselves and their families. Living
as far as over an hour away from the home means that on the days they are at
work their door-to-door return trip is over 14 hours. The Low Pay Commission has revealed that nationwide working conditions
can be worse for carers, around 9% were reported to be receiving less than this
minimum wage rate last year.

All of these considerations make caring jobs in
nursing and residential homes like ours rank amongst the most crucial yet
arguably most high pressured, exhausting and stressful jobs in the UK. Yet
despite this care workers still remain amongst the lowest paid sectors and
poorly treated workforces in the country.

One of the main
problems with conditions in care work can be attributed to the lack of
substantial, wide-spead union presence. A 2011 report by the Social Care
Workforce Research Unit at King's College London revealed that only 24% of domiciliary
care workers are unionised. Unison's national officer for social care, Helga Pile,
suggested that private home care providers' hostility to union activity could
be deterring staff from joining unions.

Whilst successive
governments have addressed issues in care homes in terms of formal health and
safety measures such as making mandatory the completion of a level three NVQ
they have paid little serious attention to the pay and conditions of staff.

So when David Cameron made his most recent
welfare speech in June, his suggestion that his 'reforms' would create greater
fairness is for care workers like myself, and the millions of other low paid
workers in the UK, way off the mark. Focusing largely on penalising benefit
claimants who he believes do not appear to be making an effort to look for work
to make the system "really fair" will do nothing to improve the
working conditions and pay of those like myself who undertake some of the most
crucial, yet minimally paid jobs.

With the reality of tough working conditions and effect
of minimal pay on many people’s quality of life there remain there are
dwindling incentives to look for work. Cameron’s attack on benefit claimants
has pushed people into a situation of Hobson’s choice, with the threat of
welfare payment stoppages for those not actively looking for work and the
spectre of day-to-day living financial costs alongside potentially unjust
working conditions for those who are engaged in minimally paid work.

Recent reports have revealed that low income
families are struggling more than ever to meet childcare costs in the UK, which
are amongst the highest in Europe. The Daycare Trust reported that 40% of low-paid
parents interviewed were considering quitting their job with another third
admitting to turning down job offers due to unaffordable childcare. Childcare
can now cost families one third of their incomes, with Nursery World estimating
that this may increase by 2016 by an additional 62% for those on minimum wage,
this largely due to the 10% drop in support by the Tax Credits system
implemented earlier this year.

This article isn't just an argument for higher
pay and better working conditions for care staff alone. It's an argument for a
radical revision of collective priorities and conceptions of fairness that
would lead to a more equitable distribution of pay on a societal level which
would see low paid workers in the UK become a concept confined to the past
instead of an ever present reality. Richard Seymour, in his book ‘The
Meaning of David Cameron’ pointed out that whilst cleaners in London hospitals
add an average of £7 to the British economy, bankers are costing our society on
average the same amount. Whilst those who genuinely add positive value to the
UK are treated with contempt those who gamble and squander large portions of
the country’s finances are rewarded. I
think we can say what's "really fair", David Cameron, but it's
definitely not what you're proposing.

Cameron’s welfare speech is the latest sign that
we can’t rely on governments to win substantial reforms of working conditions;
least of all a Conservative dominated one. Union presence within low-paid
workplaces, especially sectors like care work where it has traditionally
remained minimal needs to be encouraged. We must all fight at work to reverse
fears, if legally unwarranted, that industrial militancy could cost people
their jobs amidst a context of worsening personal economic situations and lack
of alternative jobs. We must also push to inform all staff, including the
increasing contingency of migrant workers taking up care work in the UK of
their workplace rights. As I have found out at my workplace, this is no easy,
straightforward task; due to the widespread reality of poor working conditions industrywide
staff who have spent their entire working lives in the domiciliary care sector
have come to put up with them due to never experiencing a more positive
alternative.

Making links with other types of workers within
our workplaces, alongside linking up with those in similar lines of work across
companies will help strengthen our confidence in face of hostile managements. The
decentralised nature of the industry, due to the prevalence of small, privately
owned care homes, will make it hard to establish these links with workers in
other homes that we have virtually no contact with. Yet it is something that we
must continue to push for over time if we are to have any real chance of
reforming our working conditions for the better.

Looking outside to examples of worker-led
struggles within other industries that traditionally were not union
strongholds, such as British Airways Flight attendants, the Dagenham Ford
machinists and May Hobbs’ London Night Cleaners should act as an inspiration to
many low-paid workers like my colleagues and myself. That we should not accept
our current conditions and pay should be the beginning of a fight, not a dream
that we feel resigned to put on the back burner.