Please log in

or

Register now for free

or

Choose your profile *

Email *

A valid e-mail address. All e-mails from the system will be sent to this address. The e-mail address is not made public and will only be used if you wish to receive a new password or wish to receive certain news or notifications by e-mail.

Password *

Username *

Sign up to our newsletters

Higher education updates from the THE editorial team

World University Rankings news

Student newsletters

Send me special offers and marketing info from THE and selected partners

If 2016 was the year that gave birth to Brexit and President Trump, in 2017 they turned into toddlers, bringing tears, tantrums and night terrors.

The terrible twins guaranteed an action-packed 12 months for universities the world over, so what were the high- and lowlights?

Times Higher Education’s first issue in January led on a topic that was to become one of the biggest furores of 2017: vice-chancellors’ pay. The story then was that Russell Group leaders had taken home an average hike of 6 per cent – far more than the 1 per cent average for all staff. Our scoop foreshadowed the row to come, once Lord Adonis cottoned on to v-c pay and powered up his Twitter account.

February began with another story that was to become all-too familiar: impassioned pleas for the UK to get its act together and make the case to protect universities in the Brexit talks.

Sir Vince Cable told THE that universities would be one of the “main casualties” of the UK leaving the European Union, with particular fears about access to research funding and the country’s ability to lure top global talent.

Similar fears dogged the US as Trump began his ill-fated efforts to impose a travel ban.

April brought analysis of the French election, when the run of right-wing shocks came to an end. Much was made of Emmanuel Macron’s appeal to disaffected researchers from the UK and the US as France’s new sun king sought to capitalise on his appeal to the global Left.

We also reported on academia as the battleground for spreading culture wars, highlighting how populists across Europe were targeting gender studies. This “new right” was “using gender to mobilise hate”, one professor at the imperilled Central European University told us.

The week before the UK general election in June, THE surveyed 1,000 university staff on their voting intentions – and predicted a Labour landslide. If this seemed unlikely at the time, the poll seemed less out of kilter with reality when the result came in (acknowledging that Labour still lost).

Our powers of prediction were proven again later in June with the results of the teaching excellence framework, which closely mirrored the “mock TEF” that our data team had compiled a year earlier. THE produced the definitive TEF league tables, with over a quarter of a million people reading our coverage online.

In July, we reported on rumblings of doubt about the future of the tuition fee regime in England: a THE survey found that one in three UK vice-chancellors supported Labour’s plan to abolish fees. In the autumn, the government announced a “major review” into funding, and a policy that had seemed settled was unsettled once again.

August saw the publication of the THE Nobel Laureates Survey, which pooled the insights and predictions of 50 Nobel laureates on everything from the challenges facing universities to the greatest threats facing mankind.

As autumn turned to winter, the savaging of well-remunerated vice-chancellors continued – THE led the national news agenda again with revelations of eye-watering pay-offs, including one v-c who was paid £800,000 in a single year.