"There is if you're tricking people into thinking your browser is more than it is."

What misleading facts are on the comparison page I linked? They literally say "Depending on the configuration...". It might be nice if they went further and instructed how to change the default chrome configurations, but this argument that they're tricking users is really being stretched thin in my opinion.

"I don't really know how many different ways I can emphasis this, but I'll try one last time: Iron does /NOTHING/ to make Chrome more secure, period."

But does iron claim to be more secure? It only claims to be more private by default, which is factually true. As you said, chrome's privacy settings can be configured to match Iron, but as I said, sometimes it's more practical to have an executable where the defaults are set to maximum privacy.

"A scam is defined as: A dishonest scheme; a fraud.
That perfectly sums this scheme up."

I think there's some underlying conflict that you are not letting on, but truth be told I'm happy you are bashing Iron instead of bashing *me* Have a virtual beer on me: [_])

What misleading facts are on the comparison page I linked? They literally say "Depending on the configuration...". It might be nice if they went further and instructed how to change the default chrome configurations, but this argument that they're tricking users is really being stretched thin in my opinion.

They must have changed their site then (presumably due to the criticisms raised).

But does iron claim to be more secure? It only claims to be more private by default

It used to make a lot bolder claims. Which is how it's name got spread (after all, most people wouldn't bother otherwise)

I think there's some underlying conflict that you are not letting on, but truth be told I'm happy you are bashing Iron instead of bashing *me* Have a virtual beer on me: [_])