1. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Aurthes wrote: Questions GM Homonoia 1. How many GMs/Developers play Eve? Do you play Eve? How many? No clue, but there are relatively many GMs that play. Personally I do play. Aurthes wrote: 2. It seems odd that this test for lag (ev...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.26 17:29:00

2. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]I am going to comment on only one particular comment here, the rest will be too off topic or require a much more in depth explanation than I can give here. Tiberu Stundrif wrote: I remember a day and age when the customer was always right and ...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.26 15:01:00

4. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Chiimera wrote: Thanks for answering my post GM Homonoia... oh wait nevermind. I didn't see a question in there, simply a stated opinion. If you want me to answer a question feel free to post it and I shall try and answer it if it lies withi...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.26 13:40:00

5. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Major Annoyance wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: This has been discussed and the GMs in question made a mistake. They were acting on out of date knowledge. Mistakes happen and GMs are not perfect. This is also the point where I have to remind peopl...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.26 13:23:00

6. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Major Annoyance wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: Customer support is making this post to clarify a specific type of case and our policies regarding that type of case. Recently we have seen a rise in reimbursement requests on the grounds of a conver...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.26 09:27:00

7. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Tiberu Stundrif wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: As posted earlier in the thread, the claim that it produces significant lag is still under investigation. Right now it is not allowed because it is spam, just like repeatedly EVE mailing someone is s...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.26 09:20:00

8. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Prototype Epsilon wrote: Quote: As posted earlier in the thread, the claim that it produces significant lag is still under investigation. Right now it is not allowed because it is spam, just like repeatedly EVE mailing someone is spam and n...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.25 16:55:00

9. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Tiberu Stundrif wrote: Wikipedia : "An exploit, in video games, is the use of a bug or glitches, rates, hit boxes, or speed, etc. by a player to their advantage in a manner not intended by the game's designers ." So, CCP didn't intend for pl...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.25 16:31:00

10. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Soko99 wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: Linking **** in chat channels is not allowed, but it is not an exploit. Basically, everything that breaches our rules (EULA, ToS, etc) is not allowed, but abusing the system in a way that drastically affect...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.25 16:30:00

11. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] James Amril-Kesh wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: For example, in fleet engagements we do not reimburse for any reason; we punish people abusing our systems, but we do not reimburse because there is no way to do so fairly. What exactly is your ju...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.25 16:13:00

12. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Inquisitor Kitchner wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: It is not allowed because it is spam. However, no one should lose a ship specifically because of this. In a fleet fight you should simply have auto-reject enabled. Even if you have not, you wil...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.25 14:11:00

13. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] James Amril-Kesh wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: However, no one should lose a ship specifically because of this. In a fleet fight you should simply have auto-reject enabled. Have you investigated whether this actually works? I've heard that bec...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.25 13:44:00

14. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Inquisitor Kitchner wrote: So even though it's something players shouldn't do, if I lose a ship because of it I wont be reimbursed? Do you mind if I just ask you to flesh out the logic behind that a bit? Not saying there isn't logic there, I j...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.25 13:00:00

15. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Chribba wrote: How will we know who initiated the "spam" though, should we petition ever pilot trying to open a convo a the time or how's the though proceedure? /c Just file a single petition stating where and when you were when it happened...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.25 11:47:00

16. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]Customer support is making this post to clarify a specific type of case and our policies regarding that type of case. Recently we have seen a rise in reimbursement requests on the grounds of a conversation spam exploit. Is this an exploit? No, i...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.25 11:20:00

20. Mourners of opportunity. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] DISCLAIMER: I am posting this as an individual, not as an employee of CCP. None of what I say here can be taken as any stance of CCP. This is simply e, as a person, responding to something that I feel needs a response. RANT Why does VR's deat...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.09.13 09:49:00

COPYRIGHT NOTICEEVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.