Is CERN a False Flag Operation?

In a recent article, we explained to fellow patriots how perception management used by the U.S. Department of Defense. It is defined as: “Actions to convey and/or deny selected information and indicators to foreign audiences to influence their emotions, motives, and objective reasoning as well as to intelligence systems and leaders at all to influence official estimates, ultimately resulting in foreign behaviors and official actions favorable to the originator’s objectives. In various ways, perception management combines truth projection, operations security, cover and deception, and psychological operations.”

The factors that influence the targeted audience consist of the following:

Ambiguity: If ambiguity increases, the perceiver may find it harder to form an accurate perception.

Social status: a person’s real or perceived position in society or in an organization.

Impression management: an attempt to control the perceptions or impressions of others.

The phrase “perception management” has often functioned as a euphemism for “an aspect of information warfare.” The purpose of perception management is to get the “other side” to believe what the perpetrator wishes it to believe, whatever the truth may be.

Although perception management operations are typically carried out within the international arena between governments, and between governments and citizens, use of perception management techniques have become part of mainstream information management systems.

When the government entity gets CAUGHT using perception management, it can be referred as a FALSE FLAG. Since false flags have become quite predominant in our world today, we thought it would be useful for patriots to have the list of the twelve characteristics of perception management at their easy disposal so that any questionable event could be evaluated. Since that time, we have used this list to evaluate 9-11, Sandy Hook, San Bernardino, and several other false flags.

Now we take on the mysterious and very expensive scientific operation of CERN.

For a more detailed description of CERN’s operations, please see our article below:

Ambiguity: if ambiguity increases, the perceiver finds it harder to form an accurate perception.

Counterpart: Eyewitnesses have conflicting accounts.

CERN- Scientists world-wide do not agree with CERN’s findings; diffusion of responsibility is spread over 25,000 scientists and multiple city and country participants.

Social status: targeting a person’s position in society or in an organization

Counterpart: The official narrative has obvious domestic and geopolitical advantages for the governing body.

CERN- Using the all encompassed endorsement of “internationalism”, CERN effects the military industrial complex throughout the world through its many member nations. CERN’s global mission is also to mine data and provide comprehensive surveillance of the internet, phones, and satellites.

Impression management: the perceptions or impressions of others.

Counterpart: The narrative behind the attack serves to leverage emotions like fear, as well as patriotism, in order to manufacture consent around a previously controversial issue.

CERN – Although the real purpose of CERN is never mentioned in public materials, it certainly elicits fear around the controversial operations of colliding particles that could, as their scientists proclaim, cause the destruction of the earth. It also manufacturers a consent around the big bang theory which is a controversial theory at best.

Preparation – having clear goals and knowing the ideal position you want people to hold.

Counterpart: Military and law enforcement training drills occur on the same day very close by causing confusion to obscure eye witness testimony and allow orchestrators to plant both patsies, disinformation and backup operatives. Immediate calls for gun control or restricting civil liberties.

CERN- Under the guise of scientific research, the entire world donates to warlord bankers who are protected by the ultra-secret Swiss government. Because of the diffusion of responsibility across many nations and employees, an ultimate climate of confusion surrounds the entire project. No one knows who is in charge; no audits can be conducted; no financing is ever enough; no real results are ever published.

Counterpart: News agencies keep saying that they are “being given reports” or “being told” and do not cite who reported or told them the unconfirmed information they broadcast as real.

CERN- Regular “news” and discoveries are released to the international press to bolster the support for unmitigated scientific experimentation. The press has probably never investigated the collider site thoroughly to determine its real size and scope. No reporter has ever explained how the project was built without any evidence of construction. The press is just spoon fed any old story and writes it up as CERN truth.

Counterpart: No obvious motive for the mass attack and no prior indicators. Shooter leaves manifesto or lots of evidence “proving” they were “radicalized” or “on drugs” or other were other undesirables.

CERN – CERN releases “scientific discoveries” that have nothing to do with a particle accelerator. For example, why is CERN releasing its discovery of music inhabiting a separate realm? Multiple arguments, discoveries, and stories keeps the general public unaware of what is really happening.

Centralizedcontrol – employ entities to promote propaganda.

Counterpart: Fake “victims” and crisis actors.

CERN – CERN works with 25,000 employees who are actually volunteers from around the world that have never even been to the accelerator. Higgs himself had never been in an accelerator before he supposedly discovered the Higgs-Boson particle. Swiss citizens, like false flag crisis actors, go along with the claim of living on top of a dangerous collider, never questioning how all those tunnels were constructed without disrupting the countryside.

Security – the nature of the deception campaign is known by few.

Counterpart: All drill participants and crisis actors sign non-disclosure Agreements with “National Security” clause promising swift and severe punishment if broken. Everyone involved is on a “need to know” basis and kept in the dark about the overall intent of the event.

CERN – CERN’s security is the highest (of course, because it is top-secret science in the works) and no one has given any verifiable tours of the underground tunnels. The large warehouses and the dancing Hindu Shiva statue are staged above ground for the public. Videos of dancing employees doing the dance of destruction distract you from looking at the real operations. A false flag shell game for sure!

Flexibility – the deception campaign adapts and changes over time as needs change.

Counterpart: Evidence gets destroyed or tampered with and the details don’t matter because the culprits are dead. No more interest in an investigation.

CERN – CERN schedules experiments secretly and then only releases the data much later. The data looks exactly like the simulations they create beforehand. Few people ever get to witness a collision, so they report. No one really knows what CERN is doing; there are no “real time” activities.

Coordination – organize in a hierarchy to maintain consistent distribution of information.

Counterpart: The federal agencies trump the local law enforcement agencies due to the “National Security” element of the drill which is ultimately controlled by the Department of Defense.

CERN – Internationalism trumps all nations. CERN, who or whatever it really is, has total control of its operation since it is housed in a country where secret controls were invented.

Concealment – contradicting information is destroyed.

Counterpart: Culprit is dead and evidence disappears from news reports, Internet, and media. Patsy has no military training, yet shoots extremely fast and accurately but no authority looks at the evidence.

CERN – There is no need to have CERN’s tunnels 575 feet below ground – except to hide the fact that it is a hoax and a fraud. Other colliders around the world are in clear operation above ground. But not the secretive CERN that hides all of its operations deep below the earth.

Untruthfulstatements – fabricate the truth.

Counterpart: Families of “victims” have acting backgrounds and receive payoffs in GoFundMe accounts and direct payoffs, especially mortgages. They often show little to no emotion, and even smile or laugh. The lie perpetuates and the “official story” is shaped by the media into truth.

CERN – All particles supposedly discovered at CERN and other accelerators are wild, unprovable theories. Blowing up atoms will never tell you about a healthy atom and its mechanisms. CERN is there to simply “prove” that science can mimic the Creator. And what about all of those Swiss citizens who allowed this behemoth to be built under some of the world’s most desirable lands and lakes? Were they paid off as many false flag crisis actors are?

CERN admits that it is a FRAUD

What is so astonishing is that CERN tells you on its own website what you need to look for in order to discern an internet hoax. (Since CERN is the creator of the internet—which you will read on down the article—guess they needed to alert you when you might be caught up in an internet fraud.)

CERN indicates three things that will tip you off to an internet fraud or hoax:

Technical sounding language.

Credibility by association.

Life or death questions concerning a human.

As you can see, CERN meets this criteria exactly. What project is more technical than CERN? It continuously creates new theoretical particles that no one, even the NSA, can “find.”

CERN is the largest scientific collaboration in the world. Therefore, its credibility by association is unparalleled with 25,000 top scientists working for it. That many scientists can’t be wrong, says the new alternative method of scientist research—scientific consensus.

What could be more life-threatening than opening black holes that could swallow the earth or finding anti-matter that destroys the entire Earth in the process?

Therefore, CERN, by its own definition of a hoax is a hoax of mega proportion. And it meets all the criteria for twelve basic strategies of perception management.

Share this:

Like this:

2Comments

If its for fundamental research benefiting mankind, why the need for secrecy? Seems like that needs to be the refrain for those questioning supporting the costs and possible risks, both of which apparantly are huge.

While valid in many ways, the term false flag is a bit of a stretch since so far there isn’t an attack, no particular event, no victems, etc. Additionally there is a bigger fish to fry, ie something necessary to make the general public aware. Fake news likewise is too easily neutralized suggesting just a bias, or just a few mistajes. I suggest popularizing a more general term, or more terms, of which false flag is only one subcategory, for media completly transformed into fiction, say using news to a create a totally false reality for the masses by totally scripted false events, political theater, to advance a “narative” to brainwash, ie creating an “illusion.” “Deliberately Infantilizing the public” by withholdind the accurate news. Deliberately creating a veil instead of helping lifting it. Reporting or attempting to get the public to imagine a naive Pollyanna world instead of news. News has become an informational sales promotion to get the public to buy into a progressive nazi world view, with the additional benefit of even more adds to sell products. There are better word smiths out there, but what is needed is a term or phrase that communicates the forces the listener to understand what’s so important about it. Maybe a contest with a modest prize would even be effective to the greater purpose.