We use cookies to improve our service and to tailor our content and advertising to you.More infoYou can manage your cookie settings via your browser at any time. To learn more about how we use cookies, please see our cookies policy.

PLEASE NOTE:

Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion

If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]

As I illustrated earlier, all researches on the relation between type 16
and 18 HPV and cervical cancer, as well as its primary prevention with
anti HPV vaccine, although honestly performed in a worthy manner, are
fundamentally biased (1-14.
In fact, I have underscored a fundamental bias, overlooked distressingly
and suspiciously, in all researches on the relation between papillomavirus
(especially 16, 18...

As I illustrated earlier, all researches on the relation between type 16
and 18 HPV and cervical cancer, as well as its primary prevention with
anti HPV vaccine, although honestly performed in a worthy manner, are
fundamentally biased (1-14.
In fact, I have underscored a fundamental bias, overlooked distressingly
and suspiciously, in all researches on the relation between papillomavirus
(especially 16, 18 types) and cervical cancer. As a matter of fact,
Oncological Terrain "and" cervical cancer INHERITED REAL RISK , bedside
recognized rapidly with a stethoscope, are generally overlooked by both
physicians and mass-media all around the world, with some worthy
exceptions,due to a lot of well-known reasons (1-7, 14, 15) See
www.semeioticabiofisica.it.
As a consequence, in spite of its complications, readable in Literature,
vaccination campaign against HPV to prevent cervical cancer has to be
performed exclusively in young women, surely recognized as involved by
such as disorders. In Italy, as you surely know, is going on an expensive
campaign against Cervix Carcinoma by means of HPV vaccination, adviced in
ALL young women aged from 16 to 20 years. Really, NOT ALL individuals CAN
be involved by malignancy, according to Oncological Terrain and
Oncological Inherited Real Risk theory, largely accepted by farsighted,
open-minded Editors, analogously to diabetes and CAD (1-14). All inherited
real risks are characterized by microcirculatory remodelling, wherein
newborn-pathological, type I, subtype a) Oncological, and respectively,
subtype b) Endoarteriolar Blocking Devices play a central role (1-13).
Nowadays, doctor can bedside assess both Oncological Terrain and
Oncological Congenital Real risk in two minute, with the aid of a simple
stethoscope, as I have demonstrated in details in papers published in
famous peer-reviews (1-7, 14).
To advice young women, 16-20 year old, NOT involved by Oncological
Terrain and Inherited Oncological Real Risk in cervical tissue, to undergo
vaccination against type HPV aiming to prevent cervical cancer,
demonstrates that we are living in the Middle Age of Medicine (See
http://www.ilpungolo.com/leggi-tutto.asp?IDS=13; and
http://valorieliberta.wordpress.com/2008/01/18/spunti-di-comunicazione-sul
-papilloma-virus-umano/).