All about anything, including bits of writings I'm working on, published fictions, poems and fusions, other writers' brilliant works, news about my e-mag, Mad Hatters&#39, Little Mountain Retreat, MadHat Press and Reading Series; Review, updates concerning my spectacular career as a quirky writer with a JD & MSW, but no MFA, and mainly abominable events in the present passing history of the Age of Dementia.

Search This Blog

Tuesday, September 08, 2009

* In May 2009, Facebook went into damage control in response to the media interest in Holocaust-denial groups it hosted. This occurred six months after Facebook was notified that such groups not only breached its Terms of Service but were illegal under national laws banning Holocaust denial in several countries. * Between receiving the complaints and responding to the media interest, Facebook rolled out new terms of use. These removed the explicit ban on content that is "harmful," "defamatory," "abusive," "inflammatory," "vulgar," "obscene," "fraudulent," "invasive of privacy or publicity rights," or "racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable." The reference to local, regional, and national laws also vanished. * Facebook's eventual response, defending the posting of Holocaust denial, highlighted a dramatic change in direction for a company that once sought to provide a "safe place on the internet" and stated that "certain kinds of speech simply do not belong in a community like Facebook." Facebook has through ignorance created an anti-Semitic policy platform where the only explicitly allowed hate is that, within certain parameters, directed against Jews. * Holocaust-denial groups should be removed from Facebook because Holocaust denial is a form of anti-Semitism. Such content represents a clear expression of hate and is therefore inconsistent with basic standards of decency and even Facebook's new Terms of Service. Holocaust denial also constitutes a threat to the safety of the Jewish community. Such a ban would not be inconsistent with First Amendment rights in the United States, and would be wholly consistent with hate speech bans that exist in much of Europe.

The treatment of Holocaust denial shows that ground has been lost in the fight against Anti-Semitism 2.0 (see below) and the increasing social acceptability of racism and hate within Facebook. If service providers fail to set standards barring abusive and racist content, lawmakers must intervene. Where laws exist, such as the ban on Holocaust denial in various countries, the same rules as for copyright infringement must apply, and the company itself must be held liable if it continues to facilitate a breach of the law once the matter is brought to its attention.

Giraffes in Hiding: The Mythical Memoirs of Carol Novack

About Me

Publisher/Editor Mad Hatters' Review & Pres, MadHat Arts: see http://www.madhatarts.com. Writer of fictions and poetics. Widely published. Former criminal and constitutional lawyer with M.S.W. in community organizing. See bio/list of credits at http://www.pw.org/content/carol_novack.
EXPERIENCED EDITOR AVAILABLE TO EDIT/PROOF/REWRITE ALL TYPES OF MANUSCRIPTS. TO INQUIRE, PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT AFTER MY MOST RECENT BLOG-POST WITH YOUR NAME & CONTACT INFO. YOUR COMMENT WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED.