The easiest way to do something like this would be to come up with a criteria to judge it by and score it. I.E. 1-10 points or 1-100 points. Like a game review.

Top Fighters

Top Managers

Companies

High Hyped fights

Winning Fights

Tournament participation / victories

Write ups / Forum contribution

Charity / Mentoring / Helpfulness

Division Pyramid Success

(What should be on there? What shouldn't be on there?)

Once you come up with a criteria, you score it. 1-10 per category. You add up the totals at the end of it, and bam. You'd have a winner / leader.

Or you can save the trouble, Convicted's the best damn alliance in the game and anybody with half a brain knows it. I'd only be interested in some scoring criteria to see who ends up in 2nd and 3rd place.

Is there anything on this above list that shouldn't impact a scoring criteria? Is there anything that should be added? If this is the case, pick an alliance, rate 1-10 in each category, repeat. I don't think Mike Tycoon has the time to come up with another formula to remind everybody that Convicted's the best in the game.

How do you program a formula that produces an equation from the accumulated stats op above? How do you factor in things like Write Ups / Forum Contribution and Helpfulness? You'd have to break it down cuz you couldn't possibly factor in all the above categories.

Tournament Participation shouldn't really count, its all about the wins. Just means that bigger alliances who can put in more people would top that one.

Charity, Mentoring, Helpfulness can't really set anything up to figure that out i mean you can check the mentorship program but lets be honest that isn't one of the things that make a top alliance

Write ups/Forum Contribution same again really no way unless you take how many posts made and tally them with +1's or whatever but with the amount of spamming for spin and win credits just makes it redundant.

The winning percentage along with hype of the fights can get from the Division Pyramids.

Top fighters and managers you can get from just looking at the order of them on the alliance. Top fighters they are an option to see them all on the alliance tab.

Companies would take more looking into to get anywhere with them then you would have to take the average of them all. I find this to be honest another thing that can be abused by richer alliances such as Steel Penn.

Orgs, we all know how ads effect ratings. Just inflate the ads and get a bigger event rating.

Nut/Clothing - Sponsor a high hyped fighter for a million or so and let them buy out your stock, you can do it for multiple millions if you want it to get even higher for longer and in the end you have yourself a top hyped company.

So in short you are saying there is no true way to rank the alliances, companies. I can only hope this is not the case.

I have been playing this game for over 4 years now with the hope that it can turn into a tycoon game and not just a MMA Fight Manager game it is now.

Definition of Tycoon =

1. Shogun

2. a. A top leader (as in Politics)

b. A business man of exceptional wealth and power : Magnate.

We need to do something to create Tycoons in this game and our alliances are the best way to allow us to be tycoons by the definition of the word. Alliances create leaders and business of wealth and power, or allow us to be MMA tycoons.

With some effort, communication and a lot of my cash we can create an alliance ranking that can be fair and respectable. All we need is an agreed ranking system in place and we are set. All ideas are welcome so if anyone has any please share them.

Rage where you at? Your always good with ideas, what are your thoughts on a fair system?