Undisputed - can we also have a vote on whether you get a larger refund when someone is out for the rest of the year? For example, if someone buys Woodley, and he tears his ACL in January and is ruled out for 18 months it's a bit different to someone just getting sick of their fighter and wanting to sell them because they're a can.

Or maybe that's too complicated. Would definitely have helped Juice in the last couple of years with his Jones problem.

Undisputed - can we also have a vote on whether you get a larger refund when someone is out for the rest of the year? For example, if someone buys Woodley, and he tears his ACL in January and is ruled out for 18 months it's a bit different to someone just getting sick of their fighter and wanting to sell them because they're a can.
Or maybe that's too complicated. Would definitely have helped Juice in the last couple of years with his Jones problem.

We can vote on it, but can you please write up a rule? Not really sure where it ends. I don't think a camp with Jon Jones should have been rewarded. Maybe for injuries, and then that player would not be able to draft that fighter again if they recovered, but I think there is a lot of gray area. I don't think Camps with fighters who pop should be rewarded.

We can vote on it, but can you please write up a rule? Not really sure where it ends. I don't think a camp with Jon Jones should have been rewarded. Maybe for injuries, and then that player would not be able to draft that fighter again if they recovered, but I think there is a lot of gray area. I don't think Camps with fighters who pop should be rewarded.

It's not a reward; rather it's limiting their loss due to things outside their control.

Let's take Jones as a prime example. Cost 100k. Should have finished the year still as champion, with a value of 100k, with perhaps a couple of defences netting him 80k. Therefore an investment of 100k yields 180k, plus a couple of wins.

As it was, Jones finished as unranked. Therefore an investment of 100k turned into 10k. That's basically a game-changer. Under my proposal, your 100k turns into 75k, so you've lost out but not as punitively.

Of course, anyone picking a known roider is asking for it, but there's always a first time. Anyway. Here's how I would word the rule.

"Any fighter ruled out for the rest of the year due to injury or suspension may be refunded at 75% of their current value, instead of the usual 25%"