Wednesday, January 2, 2013

AUTOMATIC GUN CONTROL: IF NOT US, WHO? IF NOT NOW, WHEN?

By Ebbtide

The NRA recently crawled out from under
its rock and gave its sermon from the (gun)mount. Did Wayne LaPierre mention
anything about high capacity magazines? Semi-automatics? Proliferation of guns
in this country? Of course, he didn’t.

Would
you buy a used car, let alone a gun, from this man?

No, according to the NRA, the problem is
video games, movies and EVIL INSANE MONSTERS!!!! The solution? MORE GUNS!!!!

"In a race to the bottom, many
conglomerates compete with one another to shock, violate, and offend every
standard of civilized society, by bringing an even more toxic mix of reckless
behavior and criminal cruelty right into our homes," LaPierre said…
"The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun."

He said gun-free school zones tell every
insane killer that schools are places to inflict maximum pain at minimum risk.

He said that we should be able to afford to put a police
officer in every school and called on Congress "to appropriate whatever is
necessary to put armed police officers in every school in this
nation."

GUNS? WHAT GUNS?

So, that’s it from the NRA. The problem isn’t that the United States has more guns, more guns per
capita, more gun deaths, more gun deaths per capita etc. etc. than any other First World country—nope. It’s video games created by “a callous,
corrupt shadow industry” that, according to LaPierre are tantamount to
pornography—how many people have DIED from pornography again? Any comparison to
the callous, corrupt NRA is, of course, ridiculous.

Oh, and it’s movies.
But, you say, people watch violent movies and play violent video games in every
other freaking country on earth, but they don’t go around slaughtering their
fellow citizens. MAYBE IT’S BECAUSE THEY DON’T HAVE EASY ACCESS TO ARSENALS?
Nah, not according to the NRA.

Teachers’ unions (this from Tea Party Nation’s Judson
Phillips who said, “Teachers Union is actually the focus of evil in the pre and
post Sandy Hook world.”

And, I kid you not—The 1968 Democratic Convention.

LaPierre's Non-problems/solutions?

Guns

More guns

Even MORE guns

Okay, we knew that was coming, and all week, leading up to
LaPierre's rant, I tried to keep track of the more insidious rumors going around that
would pre-support his lunacy. It was clear from the beginning that he’d absolve
guns from any responsibility because, after all, guns are inanimate objects and
there is no difference between a musket and an AR-15.

The only thing that surprised me was that he didn’t push the
mental health aspect any further than referring to INSANE monsters being
responsible for the murders (maybe that will come in his next diatribe.) It
surprised me because watching the rightwing noise machine leading up to his
speech led me to believe it would be part of the fabric of his blathering.

OOPS---I must
have zoned out—I see he did mention that we should have a national database of
the mentally ill. Yikes. That is even scarier still.

Perhaps he was more concerned with getting MORE GUNS into
the mix, and decided to leave the more esoteric discussions to his crazy
minions. I’m sure there’s more to come from these “righteous” morons.

Anyway, I took some time in the past week to trace the
origins of some of the memes that spread like wildfire on the right, to see if
we could discern a pattern.

SOMEWHERE OUT
THERE

There were some truly crazy ideas postulated by some of the
loons, including:

That “Sandy Hook” and “Aurora”
are mentioned in the Batman The Dark Knight Rising Movie (h/t sunnyjane).

A false flag action by (who else) the Obama administration
to prepare to TAKE AWAY ALL OF OUR GUNS

A Zionist plot conceived by Israeli forces

A long-term mind-control project by the government to create
killing machines (apparently these folks took the Mel Gibson “Conspiracy
Theory” movie to heart.)

LOSING MY
RELIGION

And then, as always, there were the religious whackos who
alternated between saying Sandy Hook was the result of taking God out of the
schools and saying Sandy Hook was a message
from God. (So I guess they’re saying God is either extremely sensitive or
particularly mean and ruthless. Not a pretty picture any way you look at it.)
The misanthropes pushing that aspect included the usual suspects:

Bryan Fischer (Director of Issues Analysis, American Family
Association.) Fischer must have given up on sleeping, because he seems to be
tweeting his insanity 24/7. A few examples:

Bryan Fischer
‏@BryanJFischer

When we had God
and prayer in our public schools, we didn't need guns.

Bryan Fischer
‏@BryanJFischer

What we can do
to stop school massacres: 1. Invite God back into our schools. 2. Allow school
faculty to carry concealed.

Bryan Fischer
‏@BryanJFischer

We need God and
loaded guns in our schools:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hgKpF-cl6M And then, of course, that “nice, smiling, guitar-picking
moderate Republican” Mike Huckabee started shooting off his mouth:

"We ask
why there is violence in our schools, but we have systematically removed God
from our schools," Huckabee said on Fox News. "Should we be so
surprised that schools would become a place of carnage?"

(Because God wants to take out his anger on 6-year-olds? Say
what?)

Franklin Graham obviously had to get in on the act:

“We've taken
God out of our school, we've taken him out of our government and now we seem
shocked at all of these things. Why are
we shocked? We shouldn't be shocked.
This is what happens when a society turns its back on God":

(I guess his message is that if you piss God off, God will
shoot you in the back?)

Oh, and how could I
forget—Disney Princess bullet-proof backpacks! (But guns are not the problem,
y’all.)

THEY’RE COMING
TO TAKE US AWAY, HA HA

What’s left that hasn’t been dredged
through the swampland? They don’t want to talk about guns other than to say
MOAR GUNZ So if it’s not video games,
movies, non-deference to young white males or lack of God, it MUST be mental
illness. (NOTE—I definitely think we need to address mental health in this
country, but the rightwing has latched onto mental illness as their excuse du
jour to explain away Adam Lanza’s actions rather than address that elephant in
the room, guns.)

So, let’s not talk about guns—let’s talk about
anything BUT guns. And let’s spread the news from Fox to the Blaze to Breitbart
to Twitchy to all of the players in the right wing echo chamber and see what we
can stir up, shall we?

Here is the genesis and expansion of just a
few of the stories that have been making the rounds to support their basis for
ignoring guns and concentrating on other issues.

1. Premise: Adam Lanza was taking the anti-psychotic
drug, Fanapt, which apparently has side-effects that lead to violence.

The story began in the NY Daily News which
claimed that the information came from Lanza’s uncle, Jonathan Lanza. Then New
York Magazine reported it, attributing it to the Daily News article. Then the
race was on with many others picking it up and then several doing in-depth articles
about the drug itself.

HOWEVER, the Daily News took down the
section about the uncle, and several other sources pointed out the possibility
that the Daily News got punked by someone named Jonathan Lee Riches, who is
known for perpetrating hoaxes and suing people and also did something similar
after the Aurora
shootings.

But it’s out there and the wingers are
running with it and the meme has become that guns are not the issue—anti-psychotic
drugs are.

2. Premise: Nancy Lanza was in the process
of having Adam committed and he found out about it and was terribly angry.
Also, this same story goes on with the (I thought disproven) addition that he
felt she cared more about the kids at the school than about him, so that’s why
he chose the school.

This little ditty came, via (of course) Fox
News, from a 25-year old Marine (why the fact that he’s a Marine has anything
to do with it, I don’t know, but it’s mentioned in every iteration of the
story.) He is described as a “lifelong family acquaintance.” Of course, this
person, come to find out, does not even know the family—he was merely passing
on hearsay. His own father affirmed that his son did not know the family and
questioned why Fox even published the story. Oh, Fox also said that an (of
course un-named) official said that they were looking into the possible
commitment angle as a potential motive.

AND THEY’RE OFF—all of the usual suspect
right wing blogs have the story featured as if it is fact. And the comments on
the stories, even at HuffPo, are appalling. A few examples (these are from
HuffPo—can only imagine what the conspiracy-minded sites are saying):

This
story sounds more true than all the other stories out there. She should have
committed him when he was a child, she could have saved her life.

Ah...
there it is: He "believed she cared more for the children than she did for
him." I figured that from the start, as jealousy is huge among young men

And then we veer off into:

a
friend of mine pointed out he was fixated on a video game where shooting the
target multiple times I guess scores more points.

He
should have been committed long ago -- we
need to go back to the days when it was much easier to put these people into
mental hospitals and not have to go thru courts etc.

Just
based on his photographs alone, I would have committed Adam Lanza.

It's clear and evident what we need is Psychological
Evaluations for every person at age 18.

Which led to:

I
agree 'it's cultural.' However, more accurately, he lacked his mother's love.

And came back full circle to unproven,
undocumented premise in article 1:

What about taking the focus off gun control and put it
where it belongs, on "fanapt" the phsychotropic drug he was on !

Only one out of about every 200 comments
ever got to the underlying

Right wing post-truth journalism reinforcing the NRA
talking point regarding the "mentally ill". You bet your A$S it is.

So let’s not talk about guns—let’s commit
anyone we think looks a little “off” and skip those pesky things like courts in
the process.

3. Then there’s the cogent angle that AP
felt would contribute tremendous insight into the story. Talking to people at
the salon where Adam Lanza used to get his hair cut. This one is too ridiculous
to even document. Obviously, some stylists were looking for their 15 minutes
because how else would this (potential) Pulitzer-Prize-winning story have even
come to AP’s attention? According to this riveting account, Lanza had stopped
coming into the shop several years ago and they thought the family had moved
away. (Lifetime execs are probably already licking their chops trying to get
the move rights to this blockbuster account.)

DON’T THINK OF AN ELEPHANT

When it comes to dealing with the right
wing controlling nearly every conversation, I often recommend that people read Don't Think Of An Elephant!/ How Democrats
And Progressives Can Win: Know Your Values And Frame The Debate.

Let’s not let them change the subject and
move the Overton Window. That’s what they did in the abortion
discussions—changed it from an issue of choice to a discussion of what types of
exceptions were acceptable in anti-abortion legislation. We let them get away
with it every time. And I say—not this time. This time it’s life or death.

************

Note: This post was written by Ebbtide on the day of LaPierre's rant.

We here at Politicalgates are determined NOT to allow this issue to rest until proper measures are created which will control the amount of automatic weapons in the USA.

Please write, phone and pester your government representative and tell them that you have not forgotten either.

1 comment:

What matters to us is the truth

"The chief thing is to have a soul that loves the truth and harbors it where it finds it. And another thing: the truth requires constant repetition, because error is being preached about us all the time, and not only by isolated individuals but by the masses. In newspapers and encyclopedias, in schools and universities, everywhere error rides high and basks in the consciousness of having the majority on its side."-- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe in a letter to Johann Peter Eckermann, December 16, 1828

Sensational revelations in the "Trig emails" about Sarah Palin's pregnancy

POST 1 - CLICK TO READ: Lisa Demer, journalist at the Anchorage Daily News, asked all the right questions about Sarah Palin's pregnancy with Trig, and asked directly for Trig's birth certificate - but was met by stonewalling and insults from Palin's staffPOST 2 - CLICK TO READ: More discoveries in Sarah Palin's released emails: Palin's team wanted to launch "pre-emptive strike" against ADN-story about Palin's pregnancy, was shocked that Lisa Demer tried to put together a "timeline" of Bristol's pregnancies and contacted schools and hospitals

POST 3 - CLICK TO READ: Newly released email suggests that five weeks after Trig's official birth, Sarah Palin didn't have a birth certificate for Trig

- UPDATE: Palin's spokesperson wants to "cut the ADN off" if they continue to ask questions about Trig's birth

- UPDATE 2: ADN-editor Pat Dougherty to Bill McAllister: "The judgment of your office to go after the Daily News on this Trig stuff would constitute malpractice"

Sarah Palin's faked pregnancy

Download all posts by Politicalgates about the faked pregnancy as PDF-document HERE.

Palin-biographer Joe McGinniss: "I think the Politicalgates archives are the best single available resource for anyone wondering why questions are still being asked about Sarah really being Trig’s birth mother." (from August 28, 2011)

We break the "Spiral of Silence" - Read the details about the "biggest hoax in American political history!"

Commentary at "The Guardian"

Commentary at "The Guardian" (UK) from April 28, 2011, written by Kathleen Baker, editor of Politicalgates, about Sarah Palin's faked pregnancy: "Sarah Palin, unreliable narrator"

How she got away with it

How Sarah Palin finally got away with the Trig pregnancy hoax, despite a mountain of evidence: Read this overview

Download Sarah Palin Trig pregnancy research paper

Download the research paper regarding Sarah Palin's faked pregnancy and the role of the media, written by Brad Scharlott, Associate Professor for Journalism at Northern Kentucky University - CLICK HERE.

Disclaimer

Although Politicalgates may from time to time monitor or review discussions, chats, postings and the like on this site, Politicalgates is under no obligation to do so and assumes no responsibility or liability arising from the content of any such locations nor for any error, defamation, libel, slander, omission, falsehood, obscenity, pornography, profanity, danger, or inaccuracy contained in any information within such locations on this site. Politicalgates assumes no responsibility or liability for any actions or communications by you or any unrelated third party within or outside of this site. Our site contains links to third-party websites. We have no influence whatsoever on the information on these websites and accept no guarantee for its correctness. The content of such third-party websites is the responsibility of the respective owners/providers. Politicalgates bears no responsibility for comments. All contributors at Politicalgates are individually responsible for their posts, and all contributors express their individual opinions in their posts. Politicalgates is a blog with an educational, non-commercial purpose.