Senator Jack Reed noted that Bush wasn’t candid; he failed to articulate his plan for victory and he failed to offer details.

“I was disappointed. The president relied too much upon rhetoric, upon a laundry list of tasks accomplished, but not a coherent view of where we are realistically and where we must go to succeed. It was more generalities than specifics,” Reed said.

Reed also noted that Bush failed to answer key questions, including, “How do we know if progress is being made there? How do we measure success? How much longer should America expect to be in Iraq?”

Both Jack Reed and John Kerry emphasized that all Americans back the U.S. troops fighting in Iraq.

“They are committed to this mission, they believe in this mission, and we — all of us — believe in our troops,” Kerry said.

Kerry nailed Bush for using a military audience once again as a “backdrop” for his speech. “It reminds you of an aircraft carrier and ‘Mission Accomplished,'” Kerry said, “While I can’t summon the Naval Academy as a backdrop — I can “summon the truth.”
Kerry said Bush mischaracterized “what this real debate is about — and what it is not about. The debate is not about an artificial date for withdrawal,” Kerry said. “For Democrats, it’s about an estimated timetable for success,” he said.

“No one has ever suggested that we should run in the face of car bombers or assassins,” Kerry said, referring to a line in Bush’s speech. “No one is talking about running in face of a challenge.. we’re talking about how to win, how to succeed, how to best achieve our goals. That’s the choice here,” Kerry said.

Kerry said Bush once again failed to acknowledge “the fundamental reality of the insurgency,” which will not be defeated by guns, but rather by “political resolution.”

“Every one of us supports the elections that are about to take place in Iraq in mid-December. The success of those elections will allow for the drawdown of U.S. troops — a conclusion the Bush administration has arrived at belatedly,” he said.

Kerry also criticized Bush for refusing to acknowledge that U.S. troops on the ground are feeding the insurgency in Iraq.

“I don’t doubt that Bush is standing up and fighting, in his view, for what is best for our country. But we have differences of opinion about what the reality is on the ground and how we get there.”

John Kerry stated that he thinks he’s been correct “every step of the way and that the country has paid a price for the administration’s mistakes: Step after step they have made choices that are wrong for our troops.”

He said he feels “completely comfortable” that he and other Democrats are fighting for is the “safety of our troops and the success of their mission and the security of the United States of America.”

Let’s hope the purist lefties don’t say there is no mission, just leave. The mission could be repairing something that never had to happen.

On one of those C-Span meeting people moments, muffled, JK talked about Bush having dug us into a real hole there. I hope we can come together and acknowledge doing something, instead of always reiterating and proving they were right about not going to war.

I loved the part of the speech were Kerry took warmonger to task for his constant use of the military as props.

The dems need to speak with one voice. Now ben nelson and liberman will join the repubs but the rest of them need to come up with a plan that the GOP and the media can’t mess up. They should use Kerry’s plan and perhaps some of murtha’s but they need to combine them so they can be clearly understood by those in the electorate who only read talking points.

John Kerry couldnt get any military personal to be a “backdrop” for his speech because there are none that support him. Oh, and I enjoyed the part of the speech where he said that no democrat has ever suggested defeat or however it went when today, Dean said that it is impossible to succeed in Iraq. Way to speek with one voice guys. Keep it up and the GOP will crush you in 06 and 08!