About Me

When not nosing, tasting, drinking and reading about malt whisky, I own one of Israel's premiere boutique coaching practices, specializing in small businesses and executive teams.
Trained in the law, I was an international law attorney and took part in Israel's peace negotiations with the Palestinians, as well as representing my country at the UN for parts of the negotiations on the implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Later I was appointed to the military bench.
My favorite thing, other than whisky, is teaching.
You can contact me through the social media buttons above or by email: michael(at)maltandoak.com, replacing the (at) with an @.

Statement of Integrity and Guidelines

Malt and Oak is an independent whisky blog, offering my own views, opinions and news from the world of malt whisky.
These are my guidelines:

1. All whisky reviews published are of whiskies I have personally tasted and noted. Guest bloggers only write about their own personal tastings.

2. With the exception of official whisky samples, I accept no consideration whatsoever from any distillery, bottler, distributor, drink company or store for my opinions.

3. I maintain strict impartiality and objectivity in tasting all whiskies, not least when tasting official samples. Any review of official whisky samples sent to me will be so noted in the post.

4. I will accept invitations to tastings, events and official visits, and full disclosure will be made on any tasting notes and articles resulting from these events or visits.

5. Any sample received over 30 ml in volume is shared with fellow whisky bloggers. In any event, no sample larger than 100 ml will be accepted.

6. No advertisements promoting specific brands will be accepted.

7. I will answer any inquiry by my readers as quickly and as fully as possible.

8. Should I give a link purchase the reviewed whisky, it will be given free of any commercial interest. The link given will always point to cheapest selling price I found on the web. No commission is paid, nor any other consideration given, for such link.

9. As of July 2017, I serve as Douglas Laing’s Israel brand ambassasdor. As such, I will obviously not be posting reviews of Douglas Laing products.

Ardbeg Supernova (Miniature) Mania – And One Blogger’s Response

We whisky bloggers have been looking at the Ardbeg mania with some bemused wonder. One must hand it to the Glenmorangie marketing department for creating this craze, much of it reminiscent of the Tulipmania which gripped the Netherlands in 1637.

Two recent incidents come to mind, the first this past April surrounding the Ardbeg Auriverdes gold bottle release. The official price for the release is £80, so this is the baseline, and the story goes like this: The marketing people at Ardbeg sent a few “whisky celebrities” a full 700 ml gold colored bottle of Auriverdes , in lieu of the normal 50 ml sample bottle. Two of those bottles “mysteriously” made their way to whisky auctions where they fetched around £2400, or enough to buy 30 bottles of the green variety.

Whisky Auction Auriverdes

And the second one:

Just Whisky Auction

This past week, Ardbeg announced a new version of the Supernova. I reviewed the 2010 version here. A new version is out, and Ardbeg sent bloggers world over a sample of the new elixir. Ardbeg heads have been going crazy trying to get hold of a miniature, prompting, no doubt, some bloggers to sell it and driving one of the most respected whisky bloggers, Oliver Klimek of Dramming to this:

Now, that’s probably going a bit far to make a statement, but from where I stand, collectors and whisky speculators are a clear and present danger to the industry, and while distilleries like Ardbeg can gain short term benefits from such tactics, in the long term, the product is being removed so far from its intrinsic value, that no word other than bubble comes to mind. I have more to say about this, and will do so in a post dedicated to the whisky bubble in the near future.

In more than one way, Oliver is doing a service to industry. Yes, it’s one person’s action – but if the craziness isn’t made to stop and the silly money stop being funneled into bottles that will never be opened, the crash will come – sooner rather than later. In 1983, that meant closing two dozen distilleries. Ironically, two of them, Port Ellen and Brora, are in the forefront of today’s bubble. Oh, how the world turns…

The main lesson for Ardbeg? Enjoy the craze while it lasts, for it won’t last forever.

I am a whisky enthusiast and a great Ardbeg fan and drinker. I have also been collecting single Malt scotch whisky miniatures for over 20 years and this is my modest opinión about this issue.

First of all let me say that nothing is essentially produced to be collected, say stamps, coins, doll housed, spoons, jugs…not whisky, but a whisky collector can be as respectable as any of the collector of the other items.
I have thousands of minis in my collection, many of them rare and pricey, many other normal commercial miniatures. Like any other collectible, availability is the main factor involved, that is why an Ardbeg Galileo miniature is worth hundreds and an Ardbeg Uigeadail is worth a few pounds anywhere.

But please let’s not mix things up. A collector is a collector and a speculator is something much different. There have been collectors of whisky miniatures for many many years, but the buble is a recent issue. Why does a miniature cost 5 times more than a full bottle. It is surely not a matter of lack of product to be bottled.

Miguel,
First of all, thank you for pointing out the distinction between collectors and speculators. It’s the speculators that are a danger to whisky, not collectors who collect for their own pleasure. Also, I don’t dispute that some bottles/miniatures cost more than others. There is no doubt that a miniature of an Ardbeg from the 1950s or of the Galileo will be worth more than a miniature of the Ardbeg 10, simply by virtue of scarcity – and that isn’t the bubble I’m talking about.
I think we basically agree, and, again, I thank you for your comment.
Michael