Access

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Journal of Applied Ecology publishes novel papers that apply ecological
concepts, theories, models and methods to the management of biological resources
in their widest sense. The editors encourage contributions that use applied
ecological problems to test and develop basic ecological theory, although there
must be clear potential for improving management. The journal includes all major
themes in applied ecology: conservation biology, global change, environmental
pollution, wildlife and habitat management, land use and management, aquatic
resources, restoration ecology, and the management of pests, weeds and disease.
Articles that interact with related fields are welcomed providing that their
relevance to applied ecology is clear. Further details are available at www.journalofappliedecology.org.
JSTOR provides a digital archive of the print version of The Journal
of Applied Ecology. The electronic version of The Journal of
Applied Ecology is available at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/117972213/home.
Authorised users may be able to access the full text articles at this site.

The "moving wall" represents the time period between the last issue
available in JSTOR and the most recently published issue of a journal.
Moving walls are generally represented in years. In rare instances, a
publisher has elected to have a "zero" moving wall, so their current
issues are available in JSTOR shortly after publication.
Note: In calculating the moving wall, the current year is not counted.
For example, if the current year is 2008 and a journal has a 5 year
moving wall, articles from the year 2002 are available.

Terms Related to the Moving Wall

Fixed walls: Journals with no new volumes being added to the archive.

Absorbed: Journals that are combined with another title.

Complete: Journals that are no longer published or that have been
combined with another title.

Abstract

(1) The breeding raven population of southern Scotland and Northumberland was formerly (pre-1960) characterized by year-to-year stability in both numbers and distribution. The 123 known pairs occupied traditional nest-sites on cliffs or trees. Breeding density was correlated with altitude (greatest on high ground) and land productivity (greater on base-poor granite than on sedimentary rocks). This was probably linked with a greater availability of sheep carrion on high ground and base-poor ground. (2) The breeding population has been declining since the 1960s, and in 1974-5 only 55% of former regular nesting areas were still occupied, with breeding pairs reduced to 44%. This was mainly associated with the afforestation of former sheepwalk. The argument is based on a geographical parallel (greatest decline in areas with most afforestation), and on a temporal parallel (desertion of particular nesting areas coincident with planting in the area surrounding the nest sites). (3) The level of afforestation at which ravens deserted varied between nesting areas. Probably it depended on the overall quality of the original habitat, and the alternative food sources available: good habitat could take more afforestation before it became untenable than could poor habitat. (4) Not all desertion of nesting areas could be attributed to afforestation: four raven pairs were dispossessed from cliff nest-sites by golden eagles which recolonized southern Scotland over the period considered, and at least five other pairs by rock climbers. Sheep management also improved over the years, and may have contributed to the desertion of some marginal nesting areas, by leading to a reduction in the amount of carrion available. Organo-chlorine compounds and persecution are unlikely to have been involved in the decline. (5) In the Lake District, a comparable hill area with practically no afforestation, there was no decline in the numbers of breeding ravens over the same period. (6) Among the pairs studied in 1974-6, those occupying the most heavily afforested ground showed more non-breeding, and produced later, smaller broods than did those on less afforested ground. Those nesting areas still occupied and where more than 25% of former sheepwalk within 5 km had been afforested, produced later and smaller broods than they did before afforestation. (7) To judge from pellets, sheep carrion formed a major part of the diet, but a great variety of other foods available from grassland was also eaten. The percentage frequency of sheep remains in pellets declined significantly with increasing afforestation in the area around the nest-sites. (8) The prediction is made of a further decline in raven breeding numbers if blanket afforestation continues to expand over former upland sheepwalk.