Part of the rescue effort in Oklahoma City, April 19th,1995.The Alfred Murrah Federal Building in downtown Oklahoma City after a car bomb ripped through it Wednesday, April 19, 1995. (AP Photo)Message painted on a wall in downtown Oklahoma by one of the rescue teams..

The attack was the largest terror attack to strike the United States in the 20th century, leaving 168 people dead 500 wounded and destroying large sections of the building.

After more than two decades it is clear that as well as being an horrific massacre, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing was a key milestone in the infiltration and destruction of the United States, along with the Kennedy assassination and 911 it stands as a signpost marking the triumph of tyranny and lies in the “land of the free.”

This operation was the culmination of an effort over decades to infiltrate, discredit and destroy the patriot and militia movements and like the Kennedy assassination earlier and the later 911 event enabled the Shadow Government to show the reach of their power and their ability to shape reality towards their ends, regardless of the facts.

Official Story.

The attack is attributed to a 4800 pound ANFO based bomb built by Terry Nichols and Timothy McVeigh and placed in a Ryder truck rented by McVeigh. The men were supposedly motivated by ‘radical right anti- Government sentiments” and also by a desire to avenge the Waco incident of April 19th, 1993. To this day that story is widely believed.

Many facts have emerged in the twenty years since the attack that make it clear that the whole narrative of an extremist plot run by anti-Government militia types was completely untrue.

Problems.

The attack was a false flag classic; in order to discredit a political enemy, the US government and other allied parties infiltrated the groups with agents and then helped and augmented the attack by providing the bomb that blew up the building as well as facilitating the patsies in their shadow operation.

There are literally dozens of facts that prove the US government account of the Oklahoma City bombing is incomplete and untrue. Before attempting to chart what really happened and discover the identity of the perpetrators the most powerful and easily understood of the impossible contradictions will be explored briefly so that the credulous will understand the need for an investigation.

Police sketch of John Doe 2 and incorrectly named as Terry Nichols. This image helps explain the fact that John Doe 2 went missing, there was no patsy that could fill the role as Terry Nichols could prove he was in Arkansas on April, 19th, 1995.

Fact No.1- John Doe 2 and the Missing CCTV footage of the attackers.

We know without a shadow of a doubt that the Government story is a lie because there are dozens of eyewitnesses and video footage of another man leaving the Ryder truck along with the Timothy McVeigh character. John Doe 2 was sought for several weeks before the FBI edited this individual from the story entirely and asserted that this individual and his presence at the scene were a figment of the imagination.

In order to achieve this the FBI had to sequester and suppress the CCTV footage from dozens of cameras positioned near the site of the blast.

FBI documents released to Kenneth Trentadue include FBI references to two individuals exiting the vehicle.

Members of the media were able to view some of the CCTV footage and were able to report the fact that there was a second man in the Ryder truck, John Doe 2 was a real person and not only was John Doe 2 present but the man was the final person to leave the Ryder truck and had sat inside the truck for several minutes after the “McVeigh” figure left the vehicle.

Oklahoma City Bombing Federal Surveillance Tapes Cover-up

The logical conclusion to this is that John Doe 2 was the person who actually armed the device and set it to detonate.

Not only does John Doe 2 exist beyond a shadow of doubt but this individual appears to be the prime mover behind the Ryder truck attack.

The brazen excision of John Doe 2, from the story is on its own rock solid proof that the US Government, the Justice Department and the FBI specifically have been involved in a cover up of the truth behind the attack.

Another fact that disqualifies the Official account relates to the revelations of BATF informant Carol Howe and the proven foreknowledge of the ATF and other Government agencies prior to the attack.

This foreknowledge related to the specific date and target of the attack leaving zero doubt that elements of the US Government knew the attack was coming and chose or were ordered to allow the attack to happen.

Carol Howe was an informant for the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms. Carol Howe was sent by the ATF to infiltrate an enclave of “white separatists” operating out of an Eastern Oklahoma property named Elohim City. Elohim is Hebrew for Gods.

With the black swastika tattoo on her upper arm Carol Howe was able to establish herself within Elohim City and became the trusted confidant of many of the people there.

In February 1995 Carol Howe reported to her handlers that a man named Andreas Strassmeir, the FBI/German and possibly Israeli intelligence operative serving as security chief at Elohim City was speaking openly of his desire to attack Government buildings, conduct assassinations and generally go to war with the US government. Carol Howe even drove with Strassmeir to Oklahoma City to conduct reconnaissance of potential targets.

The ATF made plans to arrest Strassmeir based on Howe’s information but they were ordered to stand down by other elements of the Department of Justice. After the bombing Strassmeir was spirited out of the US by an FBI informant/fake member of the “radical right” like Strassmeir named Kirk Lyons. Strassmeir appears to be at the core of the attack more than McVeigh and eyewitness Jane Graham states that she saw Strassmeir apparently wiring the Murrah building with c4 and detonation cord in the days prior to the attack.

When Carol Howe came forward with this information after the attack, she was arrested and prosecuted. When ABC tried to broadcast her story the story was canned and the Producer of the story, Roger Charles, was sacked.

Another informant named Cary Gagan tells a similar story to Carol Howe with the added detail that Gagan apparently played a minor role in facilitating the attack under the direction of US government agents. Gagan, who was involved in the drug trade, received immunity in late 1994 after his drug contacts began using him to transport detonators and timers from Mexico into the US. On April 10th, 1995 Gagan was asked to transport a locked trailer containing ammonium nitrate and an electric farm mixer and leave it in an area in Kansas close to Terry Nichols house.

The Gagan account and the role of Andreas Starssmeir will be revisited in greater depth in part three which will focus on what happened and who did it.

Government terror: Government informant warned of attack (Oklahoma bombing)

The Proven Foreknowledge of the ATF.

Foreknowledge of the attack went beyond information received. The ATF were warned to stay away from the Murrah building on the morning of April 19th, one eyewitness states that an ATF agent told him in the hours after the attack that he had received a pager message not to come to work on the morning of the 19th. No ATF agents died despite them being among the primary targets of an attack that was supposed to be revenge for Waco and to remove all doubt as to their foreknowledge and their complicity in the cover-up elements of the ATF told elaborate and easily proven lies about being in the building on the day of the attack.

“ATF’s resident Agent in charge Alex McCauley was with a DEA agent in the elevator when the bomb exploded. The elevator dropped free fall from the eighth floor to the third. The two men were trapped in the smoke-filled elevator…they managed to break through the doors…The agents made their way to the stairwell and brought with them 10 or 15 people they found along the way….”Unknown to Martz, the Midwestern elevator Company had been scheduled to perform routine inspections at the Murrah building on the day of the bombing. Within minutes of the bombing several inspectors were at the building. The ATF’s story was quickly exposed as a total fabrication by elevator technician Duane James, who described the story as “pure fantasy.” First of all the cables weren’t cut, so it was impossible for the elevators to of “free fallen.” None of the doors were forced open and safety switches to prevent excessive speed remained in place. Another important point is that the agents would have sustained serious injuries from a five-story free fall. They wouldn’t have been able to help any other people anyway.” SIGHTINGS: The Oklahoma City Bombing

Concrete stripped and steel beams completely removed. It is physically impossible that the McVeigh/Nichols device was responsible for this.Diagram of the placement of the Ryder truck exposes just how ridiculous is the idea that the truck bomb alone caused the damage.ANFO damage in reality, the aftermath of the Sterling Hall the “”New Year’s Gang” attack of August 1970 shows broken, windows, minor fire damage and no significant structural damage at all.Aerial view of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building.

Fact No.3 -The Impossible ANFO damage.

Brigadier General Ben Partin was a 31 year US military veteran who spent 25 of those years researching explosives and munitions. Brigadier General Partin immediately knew that the damage to the Alfred P. Murrah building could not possibly have been caused by an external Truck bomb alone. Partin states unequivocally that the properties of an ANFO, an Ammonium Nitrate Fuel Oil device, detonated by McVeigh and the unidentified other person who disappeared from the narrative could not possibly have caused the massive devastation that was visited upon the Murrah building in the attack.

“When I first saw the picture of the truck bomb’s asymmetrical damage to the Federal building in Oklahoma, my immediate reaction was that the pattern of damage would have been technically impossible without supplementary demolition charges at some of the reinforced concrete bases inside the building, a standard demolition technique.” Partin further explained that “reinforced concrete targets in large buildings are hard targets to blast. I know of no way possible to reproduce the apparent building damage through simply a truck bomb effort.” General Partin’s request to have the bomb site preserved in order to examine the possibility of a second explosion was ignored by the government. And in fact, when the request was made by General Partin, the government moved up the demolition by two weeks.”

Sam Gronning, a professional blaster for more than thirty years, stated;

“I have been a blaster for over thirty years and there is no doubt in my mind that ANFO could not of been by itself the medium for that powerful an explosion….even enhanced at that distance, I doubt that an external explosion could have created that extensive damage at the reported weight of the bomb.”

“My knowledge comes from practical handling of explosives,” added Gronning. “And my belief is that 4800 lbs of ANFO wouldn’t have scuffed the paint on the building.”

“No truck bomb of ANFO out in the open is going to cause that kind of damage we had there…In thirty years of blasting, using everything from 100 percent nitrogel to ANFO, I’ve not seen anything to support that story…I have set off 16000 pounds of ANFO and was standing upright just 1,000 feet away from the blast.”

Dr. Roger Raubach, who has a Ph.D in physical chemistry and is now the technical director of a chemical company has this to say;

“I don’t care if they pulled up a semi-trailoer with twenty tons of ammonium nitrate; it wouldn’t do the damage we saw there.”

Partin even wrote to members of Congress asking them to forestall the building’s demolition.

“It is easy to determine whether a column was failed by contact demolition charges or by blast loading (such as a truck bomb),” Partin wrote in his letter to Congress. “It is also easy to cover up crucial evidence as was apparently done in Waco. I understand that the building is to be demolished by May 23rd or 24th. Why the rush to destroy the evidence?”

The DOD memo of April 20th 1995 states plainly that two extra bombs were found in the Murrah building and most importantly “one was disarmed the other evacuated” destroying the childish limited hang nonsense about the cover up of the ATF’s illegal storage of explosives inside the building. Illegally stored explosives are not armed so they do not require disarming.

Fact No.4 the Missing Bombs found Inside the building.

That extra explosive devices were found inside the Alfred P. Murrah building is beyond dispute and the evidence goes well beyond the initial detailed media reports of extra devices and also the testimony of eyewitnesses such as volunteer medic Tonie Garrett who states that at least four different well-informed sources on the scene told her on April 19th, 1995 that extra bombs had been found.

There is a memo from the Department of Defense dated April 20th, 1995 that states unequivocally that in addition to the Ryder truck bomb “One bomb was disarmed another was evacuated.”

Later as part of the damage control effort, a story was put out that the bombs that were found were merely dummies used for training. This is obvious nonsense when you consider that the bombs were located by bomb sniffer dogs along with the detail from the DOD memo that one device was disarmed inside the building whilst another was evacuated. Tonie Garrett provides the interesting added details that she was told that one of the bombs had been on a timer and was due to explode ten minutes after the first attack but she had been told that the first blast damaged the timing device and caused it to fail.

In light of those facts the media reports are merely icing on the cake and prove how controlled the US media were even in 1995 and their casual contempt for their audience as they simply pretended the whole episode never happened despite their own numerous detailed reports

Oklahoma City Bombing News Reports: Unexploded bombs found in the Murrah building!

Seismic reading of the moment of the Oklahoma City Bombing shows two spikes supporting the eyewitness accounts and audio recordings.

Fact No.5 The Overwhelming evidence of two explosions.

Two Audio Recordings of the Oklahoma City Bombing.

Audio recordings of the event, seismic records and numerous eyewitnesses all indicate that Brigadier General Partin and the other experts were correct and that there were two separate explosive events in Oklahoma City on April 19th, 1995 and the truck bomb was accompanied by another larger explosion that some witnesses describe as creating a mushroom cloud.

One of the audio recordings, taken at a local government meeting, records explosive incidents over a period of eight seconds, the second audio tape, from a local law office, records one large blast followed by two dull pops around four seconds later.

Michael Hinton was traveling on a bus nearby and provides an eloquent and detailed account of tow distinct explosive events here.

One explosion can create two sounds and be experienced twice, as an air and ground blast, but there is no way that these sounds could be experienced eight seconds apart nor that this audio illusion could explain the twin seismic spikes recorded at several nearby stations.

End of Part one.

Having established that the Nichols/McVeigh “lone nut(s)” explanation for the attack cannot possibly be the truth and given the immense complexity of this case I have chosen to break this into three parts.

Part Two will look into the background of and the long-term infiltration of the patriot/militia movement looking at the death of Gordon Kahl, Ruby Ridge, the Montana 7, the Waco tragedy and in part three it is hoped to outline some of the details of how the Oklahoma City operation was achieved and the persons of interest should the US Government ever decide to reform itself and come clean about the crimes committed from within its own agencies at some point in future.

It was still ok when Uncle was recorded confessing to being responsible for the crimes, all of them, that his staff had committed. This is something else. This is unpatriotic isn’t it?

The response form the Sun to the sinking of the general Belgrano during the 1982 Falklands war.

The Saxe Coburgs Gotha’s are after all a German family and they are also fascists so it is perfectly understandable that the Saxe Coburgs Gotha’s found it a good idea to teach their children Nazi salutes. Perfectly natural.

The response to this from the Daily Mail is actually some of the most hilarious nonsense I have ever seen.

The title has been improved since the piece was published and they are now running with

‘The Sun has sunk to a new low’: British public reacts with fury after tabloid publishes 80-year-old pictures of the seven-year-old Queen and the Queen Mother being taught a Nazi salute ” although how they have been able to gauge the response of the 80 million or so Britain’s to the Sun story within hours of it’s appearance is somewhat unclear.

But I love the spin the Mail have tried to put upon this story

“The shocking film from 1933 shows Edward VIII teaching his nieces the seven-year-old future Queen and her three-year-old sister Princess Margaret how to do the salute in the gardens at Balmoral.”

“The publication of the 17-second film has outraged thousands across the nation who believe that the Queen cannot be held responsible for her actions as a girl playing with her family.”

This is a brilliant attempt to obscure the important thing here. Of course the bloody Queen and silly little three year old Margaret cannot be held responsible for what they did but that is completely beside the point.

The point is that Britain’s rulers are a group of Germans with strong fascist sympathies and deep historical links to National Socialism along with many other elements of the Western elite. The Nazi party were embraced by the cream of the American corporate establishment before they realised that fascism would be much more successful if marketed in a more stealthy or “friendly” mask.

The UK Column reports that Senior British Civil and Military officials are warning of the intent to take the next step towards open “Oligarchical Collectivist Fascism” in Britain.The intent has been so clear for so long and so many of the necessary preparatory steps have clearly been taken, that this may be correct.