Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 2800 articles.

You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Friday, April 8, 2016

People's Awareness Coalition Comments About

by Anna Von Reitz

Several people have asked my opinion of the PAC and the organization's guru LB
Bork.

I first read the Red Amendment several years ago, and while the material
was well-reasoned within the information the author had at the time, it was
immediately apparent to me that LB Bork didn't have all the pieces.

For example, not knowing that the United States has always
been foreign with respect to the states, that the United States has
always embraced dual citizenship--- and not just after the Civil
War, that the United States Trust is what the United States of America was
organized and tasked to protect, that the names of documents as well as the
legal style of the name matters, that these things are meant to operate in
completely different jurisdictions than the organic states--- that is, the
reason that the Federales call us "non-resident aliens".

There are a great many weird realities that result from the odd
arrangements our Forefathers made. For example, the Federales, as James Thomas
McBride observed, are not obligated to protect your body, but they are obligated
to protect your property and not trespass on your rights. A sane man might say
it is hard to protect one while violating the other....but that's the way it is
and the reason that police are not obligated to protect you even though you pay
their salaries and assume that that is their job.

Bork is also one of the main sources of the theory that we "commoners" who
owe our allegiance to the respective land-based organic nation-states where we
were born as Californians, Texans, Wisconsinites and so on, are not members of
the "People" of the United States. This assumption on Bork's part seems to stem
from looking at it only from the perspective of the organic states, which never
allowed dual citizenship at any time, and failing to look at it from the
perspective of the United States which always has allowed and promoted and used
dual citizenship.

This is reiterated over and over in Federal Code and indeed, even by Bork,
who refers to the language of the Fourteenth Amendment repeatedly and somehow
fails to note that the Federales claim people born in their jurisdiction and
anyone "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" as "citizens" but one may be
one of the people without being a citizen so far as the Feds are
concerned. And this has always been the case, too.

Going back to the Definitive Treaty of Peace 1783 which was the official
peace treaty ending hostilities between the British and the Americans at the end
of the Revolutionary War, we see two different kinds of people present and
mentioned---- the free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States
and the "inhabitants" who are subjects of the King and the Crown who remain to
provide "essential governmental services" as provided under Article IV, Section
3, Clause 2 of the much-later Constitution for the united States of
America.

From the Federal perspective--- that is, from the international
jurisdiction of the sea--- one can be one of the "People" without being a
citizen at all. This distinction comes from the fact that a "citizen" owes an
obligation of service and the people do not. This is the same distinction one
must make when realizing that "sovereign citizen" is an oxymoron, a conflict of
terms, and that one cannot be a "citizen"---neither state nor federal--- and a
"sovereign" at the same time.

I am aware of that fact and the reasons for it and as nasty, duplicitous,
self-serving, dishonest, and often in Breach of Trust as the British Crown has
been in mischaracterizing us as "inhabitants" and "employees" and "volunteers"
and "citizens" willingly and knowingly subjecting ourselves and our property to
their tender mercies, I think that it is a great disservice to everyone
concerned to advance any argument whatsoever disinheriting us from our natural
status as one of the free, sovereign, and independent people and members of the
People, collectively.

To act upon this misunderstanding is to throw away our joint sovereignty
and inheritance --- the assets of the United States Trust which we are all
owed. One does not need to be or to claim to be a United States citizen of any
stripe to be a Beneficiary of the United States Trust, the richest, largest,
most powerful trust on the planet. Indeed, it is our standing as lawful
beneficiaries of this Trust and its assets that is our most compelling source of
empowerment, for in this capacity we act as the Equitable Title Holders and
Holders in Due Course, and we are enabled to "take against" the Will of any
other group of beneficiaries past or present.

Those who wrote and adopted the evils of The Constitution of the United
States of America, Inc. and its insanely and purposefully convoluted 14th
Amendment back in 1868 have been rightfully caught in their deceits and
skullduggery by Lysander Spooner and President Andrew Johnson and LB Bork and
other great Americans. The rats responsible stand accused and self-evidently
convicted of treason against the actual Constitution, revealed as criminals and
con artists, intent on enslaving others and maintaining unlawful oppression by
force of arms. They expressed their Will with the publication of their
deceptively named corporate charter--- the Constitution of the United States of
America--- but there isn't a thing in the world preventing any one of us from
making different choices.

We each have free will of our own. Just because a bunch of musty old
robber barons and greedy, dishonest bankers worked a fraud against our
great-grandparents and published a deceptively named corporate charter for
themselves, deliberately seeking to confuse "the Constitution of the United
States of America" with "The Constitution for the united States of America"----
it doesn't bind our hands today.

We don't have to vote in their elections, which as LB Bork points out,
identifies us as criminals acting against the actual Constitution. We are free
to say, hey, wait a minute, I was misinformed and misled and made a mistake
accordingly.

We can revoke all "Voter Registrations" and we can act upon our own Will.
We can act as Beneficiaries of the United States Trust and hold all these vermin
feet first to the fire. We can hold our own elections and fill our vacated Land
Jurisdiction Offices and operate our unincorporated States on the Land and we
can even call a Continental Congress and rewrite their contract. We can, if we
so desire, renegotiate the agreements reached 200-plus years ago and we can fire
them. They are our employees on one hand, and their King is in violent Breach of
Trust as our Trustee on the High Seas and Inland Waterways on the other. We
can bring charges against the banks and their governmental services corporations
and their corporate officers and agencies in international courts of record and
fine them, confiscate their assets, and liquidate their corporations as known
crime syndicates.

Once you know who you are ---and really, truly know who you are--- it turns
out that all the power actually does remain with us and with the choices we
make. We are in fact beneficiaries of the United States Trust and all this
wrangling over different kinds of "citizenship" is a Red Herring, because we are
not obligated to be or to act as "citizens" of any kind. We can just stand on
our little flat feet, revoke all registrations, rebut all presumptions of
citizenship, and go from there.

The inhabitants of the Federal United States who ARE Federal United States
(C)itizens are indeed subject to the British Crown and they are here being
employed to provide us with essential governmental services under contract; they
are literally public servants and in that much-diminished capacity have
contrived to benefit themselves, similar to the antics of a dishonest Butler.
Still, at the end of the day, a Butler is still a Butler, and the Lord of the
Manor is still a Lord.

I don't share Bork's bleak and bitter view. I don't for a moment accept
his view that we are in any kind of "limbo land" or statelessness. We are the
beneficiaries of the United States Trust. We are the joint sovereigns of the
land jurisdiction of the United States. Once we wake up and Declare ourselves,
the rest is rather easy and self-evident. We are the sovereigns without
subjects, in command of ourselves and our destiny; if we haven't called a
Continental Congress together in 200 years it is nobody's business but our own.
If we operate or don't operate our natural unincorporated state governments,
that is also nobody's business but our own. I would merely observe to everyone
that our failure to do so has enabled a great deal of theft, chicanery, and
criminality and that the sooner we take our rightful places at the helm of our
fifty ships of state, the better.---------------------------------------

Donations to keep this going.

It costs a bit to keep this blog going, for the research, the time away from our business, the server space and bandwidth, and the phone to field questions. If you would like to help with that please donate what you can.Here is the PayPal link.

Donate Using Paypal We appreciate whatever you can do no matter how small.