Together, we can get through this . . .

Google motto 2004: Don’t be evil
Google motto 2010: Spying on you for the CIA isn’t evil
Google motto 2017: Internet censorship is good for you

According to a Feb, 2017 Wired article, Google introduced a new tool, named “Perspective,” supposedly to help fight online “trolling,” to “keep the web safe” and to “alert users to likely TOXIC content.” According to Google’s “Perspective” website, “Toxic” is defined as “a rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable comment that is likely to make you leave a discussion.” You can “try out” Google’s AI “Web Filtering” Algorithm by submitting any phrase to their new AI test page. Try it for yourself!

The balance of what is in prozac is designed to get that fluoride across the blood brain barrier and keep it there. Once in the brain, the fluoxetine hydrochloride, then separates and stays.

Actually, because Prozac is fluoxetine hydrochloride, and because anything that bonds with fluorine, is also classified as a form of fluoride; one could say that prozac is 100% fluoride.

Yikes!

.

So what?

Fluoride, in any form, is a highly toxic substance, more toxic than lead, but slightly less toxic than arsenic. This is why fluoride has long been used in rodenticides and pesticides to kill pests like rats and insects. (Source)

See London Bridge terrorists stab a guy and then get shot by police: here. Warning! This gripping violence will make you feel the fear is disturbingly graphic.

Yep, TERROR!! fans, at least in this episode, the money shots killings were “real” but, as political pro, Rahm Emanuel, once explained, “Never let a serious crisis go to waste.” Of course, this begs the question, why should pro politicians have to wait for random crises to exploit–why not just create them? Indeed.

In this blog post we’ll go behind the scenes! You’ll see actors putting on their “terrorist” costumes; you’ll see camera crews setting up protestors; you’ll see “bloopers” by low-paid bit part witness actors . . .

Rate this:

It was only a week ago that the U.S. enunciated a new policy that we would be content for Bashar al Assad to remain in power presiding over the Syrian government — after years of grousing and threats against him.

Why would Assad choose this moment, only days after the US granted him a pass on remaining in power, to do the one thing guaranteed to bring the wrath of the US down him, namely, kill a lot of civilians, including women and children, with poison gas? The media’s narrative is not what happened.