Hmm...in the stacks is pretty bold, I generally stuck to the study rooms and supply closets. Day before Thanksgiving however I can confirm would be a perfect time to go for it in the stacks a large academic library (honestly you'd probably get a golf clap from the staff when you finished if you were caught...ok, I would have golf clapped, I worked in academic libraries for a number of years).

/yes, I would hit that//actually, she reminds me of a gal I had a few trysts with...but not in the library, well once ok?

TFA: "it isn't actually a column about sex; it's a column about Nadia Cho." ... "She is not a journalist, she's an exhibitionist." ... "Getting to work and thinking, 'There won't be people f- in the library today.' Now that is liberating."

So what you're telling me is the DailyCal has an audience of AARP members?

Because no-one under 60 is thinking these things. shiat, no-one under 60 can likely *remember* journalism before it embraced the self-aggrandizing subjective viewpoint. From which Cho's exhibitionism is all but expected. And that last complaint is just some crusty old fuddy-duddy who'd rather pretend no-one has any genitals and they certainly don't go about madly mashing them together everywhere and all the goddamned time.

ringersol:TFA: "it isn't actually a column about sex; it's a column about Nadia Cho." ... "She is not a journalist, she's an exhibitionist." ... "Getting to work and thinking, 'There won't be people f- in the library today.' Now that is liberating."

So what you're telling me is the DailyCal has an audience of AARP members?

Because no-one under 60 is thinking these things. shiat, no-one under 60 can likely *remember* journalism before it embraced the self-aggrandizing subjective viewpoint. From which Cho's exhibitionism is all but expected. And that last complaint is just some crusty old fuddy-duddy who'd rather pretend no-one has any genitals and they certainly don't go about madly mashing them together everywhere and all the goddamned time.

FTFA: She sought to have loud sex in a variety of haunts, from the library's European Union section to the classrooms of Moffitt and Wurster - which "gives you an idea of how fantastic it would be if your hot (graduate student instructor) pounded you on the front desk every time you forgot to turn in a homework assignment."

How many weeks does she have for this project? I'm old, so sex once a week or so does me just fine.

ringersol:So what you're telling me is the DailyCal has an audience of AARP members?

Because no-one under 60 is thinking these things. shiat, no-one under 60 can likely *remember* journalism before it embraced the self-aggrandizing subjective viewpoint. From which Cho's exhibitionism is all but expected. And that last complaint is just some crusty old fuddy-duddy who'd rather pretend no-one has any genitals and they certainly don't go about madly mashing them together everywhere and all the goddamned time.

I applaud the sexually adventurous. I loathe attention whores.

And call me crazy, but a sex columnist should probably educate about sex rather than just putting her sexual history on display. There is plenty of time to do that at the bar.

dustygrimp:ringersol: So what you're telling me is the DailyCal has an audience of AARP members?

Because no-one under 60 is thinking these things. shiat, no-one under 60 can likely *remember* journalism before it embraced the self-aggrandizing subjective viewpoint. From which Cho's exhibitionism is all but expected. And that last complaint is just some crusty old fuddy-duddy who'd rather pretend no-one has any genitals and they certainly don't go about madly mashing them together everywhere and all the goddamned time.

I applaud the sexually adventurous. I loathe attention whores.

And call me crazy, but a sex columnist should probably educate about sex rather than just putting her sexual history on display. There is plenty of time to do that at the bar.

I blame Sex & the City. It clearly gave rise to feminine, soft-core, literary porn ideals for sex column journalism. So long as the columnists look better than Sarah Jessica Parker, I also applaud Sex & the City for soft-core literary porn in general syndication. My, how times have changed.

Not to be all studman69 or anything, but I talk to her on a kind of frequent basis and she is most definitely not hot. Not bad looking, but not hot. She is just a normal hipster chick who happens to be open about her sexuality and is open to trying new things. I'm pretty sure she is not the only person that has done naughty things on the stacks, yet she is the one that talks about it and gets all the shiat. Breaking news: girls like sex too.

Also, it's pretty sad to see that 99% of the backlash from her column (which has been surprisingly overwhelming) has been from girls/women labeling her with the usual bs names. It's sad to see how women themselves are the ones enforcing certain social norms that they complain about all the time. Guys obviously wouldn't complain but they could respond negatively by harassing her or shiat like that, which luckily hasn't really happened.

/pardon the generalization with the use of term "women", it's just for the sake of argument.