Freeways for Italy, the analysis cost-benefits of Gronda is characterized by macrocospic errors, unattainable technical solutions, appraisals of the completely arbitrary data

The company evidences that any type of modification of the project would make to leave again from zero the iter progettuale and autorizzativo causing to a delay 6-10-year-old

"The analysis cost-benefits of Gronda published on the site of the MIT is characterized by macrocospic errors, unattainable technical solutions, appraisals of the completely arbitrary data". The denunciation in a note Freeways for Italy, the society that has proposed the project for the realization of the work that is approved of by the same Ministry of Infrastructures and the Transports. "Although such use absolutely corrected of the parameters, on which Freeways for Italy reserve is set in action lawyers to own protection - the company emphasizes - the outcome of the analysis cost-benefits is positive, not confirming the clean prevalence of the benefits on the costs of the work".

For Freeways for Italy, "in case it was held in consideration, this analysis cost-benefits would have as only effect that to ulteriorly delay the realization of the work, strongly intentional from the genoese community, the local institutions and the entire productive world".

Among those that Freeways for Italy consider to be "main contained incongruities in the analysis", the company of the Atlantia group finds that "the solutions proposed alternatives are not technically realizable, as the necessary work is not executable, or would in fact block the traffic from and towards Savona for numerous years. In fact - the society explains - the solutions shown alternatives, instead moving the heavy traffic to out of the urban fabric, would load of heavy flows the city drafts, congesting the city of Genoa ulteriorly. Moreover, the analysis of the MIT minimally does not hold account of the safety assessments, fundamental element for any study of this type".

Freeways for Italy observe moreover as "the cancellation of the project, that it has for a long time completed autorizzativo its iter, would determine huge damages for the State. REELS - the company remembers - as a result of the signed contract with the MIT, have already carried out 92% of expropriations on the territory and bandit contests for about 700 million euros. The lacked start the work and a modification of the project, as estimated from the same analysis cost-benefits, would involve the compensation of beyond a billion of euro for the up to now carried out work. Moreover, the final cost of the work is of 4,3 billion euros, instead of the 4,7 erroneously brought back from study MIT".

At last Freeways for Italy emphasize that "the analysis of the MIT is based on a old project of Gronda, not on the executive project. Planimetry old and inserted today not existing connections are used in fact - the society explains - or not making part of the project of REELS. Account moreover of the liberalization of the feature of the A10 between Prà and Genoa Airport, demanded from the same MIT with the approval of definitive project 2017 does not hold in September. He is therefore obvious that the working group of the Ministry has not worked on the executive project, of which the Ministry he is in possession from last August, and that the analysis is carried out without some conflicting one with Freeways for Italy".

Freeways for Italy still evidence that "any type of modification of the project would make to leave again from zero iter progettuale and autorizzativo of Gronda, causing a delay 6-10-year-old in the realization of the work, determining the risk to ditch it definitively" and that "in any case, are from considering the suggestions in the field made from thousands of genoese citizens in the within of the public debate very more important and precious, first experiment of that sort in Italy, respect to abstruse options studied to small table to Rome".