On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 04:17:24AM -0800, Chris Little wrote:
>It's unclear whether you are working entirely from an ODT
>exported from Wikisource articles or are also using the CzeBKR
>module exported via osis2mod, but there's no way we would
>distribute content produced via either of these methods.
The former, as the CzeBKR as it currently stands is faulty
(using the first edition text for the New Testament).
>Wikisource can be a good source for Bibles, but there are a couple of
>very significant problems with how you are using Wikisource. The first
>problem is that you aren't using the Wikisource source text, you're
>using something that has already been transformed into ODT.
It has been exported to ODT by the Wikisource page itself.
http://cs.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Speci%C3%A1ln%C3%AD:Kniha&bookcmd=book_creator&referer=Bible+kralick%C3%A1
Meaning, I AM working on the WikiSource text (or there is some
serious bug in their software, but I’d bet it’s better than what
we have).
But see below ... I will drop ODT efforts alltogether. It is not
worthy.
>unnecessarily introduces the potential for errors. It's also
>much, much easier to transform Wiki markup to OSIS than it is
>to transform ODT to OSIS.
I hoped for the OSIS OpenOffice filter to work. Apparently, it
doesn’t.
>If you intend to use Wikisource as a source text, use the
>underlying Wiki document and write a script to pull a fresh
>copy from Wikisource so that changes to the Wikisource copy can
>be easily integrated into updates. If you'd like an example
>Python script that downloads documents from Wikisource and
>generates an OSIS document, I can send you one.
You are right. It really was easy
http://luther.ceplovi.cz/git/czebkr.git/tree/get_text.py
>"Maintainer" contact info is not useful or necessary because
>"maintainers" usually maintain their submissions very little if
>at all. Module bugs go into the bug tracker. From there, we
>assign the bugs to the appropriate maintainer. If you feel the
>need to sign your module, you can add a note at the end of the
>About section.
I understand that you insist to having everything under the
control and in secrecy (why would y'all otherwise hide
maintainers, and also see the recent discussion on SVN v. DVCS),
but I don’t think it is the best way how to encourage community
collaboration. But that’s your choice (or rather, choice of
everybody behind the project).
https://lwn.net/Articles/370157/
>>Could somebody upload to our repository
>>http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/tmp/CzeCSP.zip with the new version, please?
>>We do not accept submissions of compiled modules. Submissions are
>still done the same way as they were two years ago: send the OSIS file
>or a link to it to modules at crosswire.org.
Sorry, you are right. I will.
Blessings,
Matěj
--
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mcepl<at>ceplovi.cz
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
A GOOD name is rather to be chosen than great riches.
-- Proverbs 22:1
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/attachments/20140227/2413af4d/attachment.sig>