sorry to say, but in regards to VC sony >
nintendo

No when you argue game quality, you simply can't except on the technical levels, because it's entirely unfair.

Basically, arguing over video games is pretty stupidI only still do it to keep my anger management/debate/trolling/troll slaying skills sharp.---"The best, most perfectly tuned online game will always have one glaring flaw.Anyone can play it." _ Dueric

Look, I don't believe developers pay reviewers for good scores.What I do believe is that every single game reviewer has their biases. The problem is, game sites basically have the fans review the games they're a fan of. And this simply doesn't work.

IMO, the best way to do reviews is to have a group of reviewers, and have them rotate consoles, and genres, for every single review and challenge them to be as objective as possible

If I want a subjective review, well...GameFAQS.---"The best, most perfectly tuned online game will always have one glaring flaw.Anyone can play it." _ Dueric

% of Exclusives for 80+ Games:Vita: 50%, 3DS: 32% (36%/45%)*, WiiU: 18% (36%)**: Whether or not Unsures count. For 3DS, first includes only Cave Story 3D, second includes the ports.

The Vita has the highest amount of 80+ rated games (not including ports), the Vita has the highest percentage of exclusives among them, and the Vita has the #1 rated game of all 3 systems.

The chain is only as good as the weakest linkCheck out lowest scores for each platform tooExclusives only of course.

I'm currently debating against the merits of any and all review scores on grounds of subjectivity.---"The best, most perfectly tuned online game will always have one glaring flaw.Anyone can play it." _ Dueric

No when you argue game quality, you simply can't except on the technical levels, because it's entirely unfair.

Basically, arguing over video games is pretty stupidI only still do it to keep my anger management/debate/trolling/troll slaying skills sharp.

But most games do NOT have technical faults that inhibit gameplay or ruin the experience... So what makes a game a bad game? Perhaps you could list some examples?

If a game is released and it's technically bad, it's going to be noticed. It's going to hurt the review scores as well. So the review score is indicative of technical quality as well.

Your opinion of technical quality is different than others, so that's still subjective. There are very, very few universal truths. If any. I personally believe there to be none.---whythefat "DDR, I notice your karma is 567. That 5+6+7= 18. 18 plus your IQ is 19. There were 19 hijackers on 911. You are a terrorist."

No when you argue game quality, you simply can't except on the technical levels, because it's entirely unfair.

Basically, arguing over video games is pretty stupidI only still do it to keep my anger management/debate/trolling/troll slaying skills sharp.

But most games do NOT have technical faults that inhibit gameplay or ruin the experience... So what makes a game a bad game? Perhaps you could list some examples?

If a game is released and it's technically bad, it's going to be noticed. It's going to hurt the review scores as well. So the review score is indicative of technical quality as well.

Your opinion of technical quality is different than others, so that's still subjective. There are very, very few universal truths. If any. I personally believe there to be none.

Technically good is Nintendo first party qualityTechnically average is something, like.... say... CoD, it has it's bugs and balance issuesTechnically bad would be more like... eh, dunno, but they still exist.Anyway, it's late here, I prefer to do battle with trolls, not make intelligent conversation on this sort of thing. Forgive me, we can talk about this later.---"The best, most perfectly tuned online game will always have one glaring flaw.Anyone can play it." _ Dueric

The chain is only as good as the weakest linkCheck out lowest scores for each platform tooExclusives only of course.

I'm currently debating against the merits of any and all review scores on grounds of subjectivity.

No it isn't, unless you plan on buying every game for the system. Disregard the bad ones. All that matters is how many good games there are to buy. I'd be surprised if the 3DS didn't have a larger library of 'good' games, but in regards to 80+..

But I'll appease you.

Lowest Rated Game for each System (metacritic):Vita: BLOPS Declassified (32)3DS: Mad Dog McCree (27)WiiU: Family Party (11)...