Wal-Mart should fix its image problem over worker pay

CarolKopp

Reuters

Just as Ikea was getting a load of good press this week as the latest low-wage retailer to give its employees a decent raise, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. was still explaining why its existing pay scale works just fine.

In fact, the country’s biggest employer was getting fairly defensive as it explained the logic behind its pay scale. So defensive that you have to wonder why it doesn’t just bow to the inevitable and pay its employees better, instead of pouring all that public-relations energy into explaining why it can’t or won’t do that.

Authors decry Amazon e-book fight

(4:13)

Some big-name authors have signed an open letter attacking Amazon.com for its handling of negotiations over a new e-book contract with Hachette Book Group. Jeffrey Trachtenberg joins MoneyBeat. Photo: Getty Images.

I say the shift to higher pay is “inevitable” because nine U.S. states have already passed increases in their state minimum wages this year, and 38 are considering doing so. When the debate over a federal minimum wage died in Congress, the political pressure went local, particularly to cities and states with a high cost of living.

Wal-Mart
WMT, -0.34%
could anticipate the trend by a few months and look great.

Ikea’s starting wage will be based on a regional “living wage calculator” that estimates the minimum income needed for a single person without children to survive. So, Ikea workers won’t exactly be rolling up to those superstores in BMWs, but they will be eating regularly.

Another big retailer, Gap
GPS, +0.46%
, also recently announced a decision to raise its salaries, starting with increases this month to at least $9 an hour and a second increase, to $10, in June 2015. Starbucks
SBUX, -1.33%
didn’t announce a wage increase, but it introduced a college tuition plan for its employees, and urged other companies to look at the total compensation picture in considering positive changes.

At the same time, Wal-Mart is in the news for defending itself against an opinion column by writer Timothy Egan in the New York Times in which he called Wal-Mart “a net drain on taxpayers, forcing employees into public assistance with its poverty-level wages.”

Wal-Mart responded vigorously on its company blog, with a “Fact Check” of Egan’s column in which it insisted that Wal-Mart is not, in fact, a net drain on the American taxpayer.

Predictably, conservative writers called Wal-Mart’s response “epic” and “devastating.” Equally predictably, a writer for the Huffington Post, Mark Gongloff, called it “Mostly bull.”

The question is whether Wal-Mart is shooting itself in the foot by arguing on the losing side. The company is ignoring, or disputing, a strong and widespread concern among economists as well as the general public that low-wage jobs are undermining America’s economy and the health and well-being of its working population.

In his column, Egan noted that Wal-Mart had a disapproval rating of 28%, according to a recent poll by Lake Research Partners. Wal-Mart responded that it is “pretty sure any corporation, politician even media outlet would like to have a 72% favorability rating.”

In fact, the survey by Lake Research Partners shows Wal-Mart has by far the highest disapproval rating of any major American retailer. Target
TGT, -0.09%
scored a 13% disapproval rating, followed by Costco
COST, -0.57%
at 6%, and Amazon.com
AMZN, -0.66%
at 4%.

The survey concluded that, “An important share of consumers do not believe Wal-Mart treats their employees well. This affects how they feel about Wal-Mart and their willingness to shop there.” In addition, it said that the company’s pay and treatment of workers is “leading even some of its most loyal customers to consider avoiding the store.”

Wal-Mart’s slogan is “Save Money. Live Better.” Highly effective — if it proves that its employees can live better, too.

Intraday Data provided by SIX Financial Information and subject to terms of use.
Historical and current end-of-day data provided by SIX Financial Information. Intraday data
delayed per exchange requirements. S&P/Dow Jones Indices (SM) from Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
All quotes are in local exchange time. Real time last sale data provided by NASDAQ. More
information on NASDAQ traded symbols and their current financial status. Intraday
data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges. S&P/Dow Jones Indices (SM)
from Dow Jones & Company, Inc. SEHK intraday data is provided by SIX Financial Information and is
at least 60-minutes delayed. All quotes are in local exchange time.