I never said that. So the person you are arguing against is, in fact, yourself

But now that you mention it, Pinta is in fact a general purpose graphics editor with very basic painting related feature set, clearly not a specialised tool such as MyPaint or Krita (and most lkely for a good reason).

I never said that. So the person you are arguing against is, in fact, yourself

But now that you mention it, Pinta is in fact a general purpose graphics editor with very basic painting related feature set, clearly not a specialised tool such as MyPaint or Krita (and most lkely for a good reason).

So what is the point that you are trying to make? "

Here was your original post.

If you want a simple Paint.NET-like tool for Linux, just use Pinta. Nobody's forcing you to use GIMP, you know And Krita will probably not help you: it's a painting app now.

To me, it read like you first saying that "if you wanted a painting app use pinta" ... and then going on to say that "Krita would be no godd for you because it is only a painting app".

I thought ... WTF?

With your response now ... I have absolutely no idea what you actually intended to say. Regardless, you didn't manage to get your original message across, whatever it was.

He's saying "Pinta is like Paint.net"; to read in to this "Pinta is a painting program" you'd have to first establish that "Paint.net is a painting program" which is a matter for some debate, at least.