This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising.
By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy.
You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site.
To learn more see our Cookies Policy.

The woman, who is in her 30s, was convicted at Dublin District Court of neglecting the boy’s education.

A DUBLIN MOTHER, who was given a three-week jail sentence after her eight-year-old son missed more than 240 school days over two years, has been released to appeal her case.

The woman, who is in her 30s, was convicted at Dublin District Court of neglecting the boy’s education following a prosecution by Tusla, Child and Family Agency.

Imposing the sentence on Monday, Judge Anthony Halpin did not accept the woman had been doing her best to get her child to school and the situation got worse since her trial in October when sentencing was adjourned.

In the event of an appeal bail was set at €1,500.

She has since signed the bail bond in the District Court and was released to appeal the outcome of the case in the Circuit Court.

When he imposed the sentence the judge had said, “I’m not satisfied the defendant has got the message”.

He added that she had, “not learned anything from the court hearing, the child is suffering and his development has been significantly affected”.

A parent could be fined up to €1,000 and jailed for a month if convicted of breaking the Education (Welfare) Act for not complying with an official warnings about a child’s school attendance.

Under the Act the minimum school leaving age was raised to 16 years or the completion of three years of post-primary education.

The lone parent had been found guilty following a hearing on 8 October last and Judge Halpin noted her son’s school attendance continued to get worse.

The west Dublin mother had been cleared of the same charge in relation to the child’s older sibling who was suspected of suffering from depression and anxiety.

Absence

The boy had been absent from the school roll on 139 out of 175 days during the 2017-2018 year. That was a 79% absent rate.

From September until the trial he not present on 13 days.

Since the trial 2018-2019 year there were 134 school days and the boy had missed 90 of them, an absent rate of 67%, Judge Halpin was told.

An education and welfare officer told the court, this “was going to have an obvious effect on teaching and learning” for the boy.

She agreed there were concerns the woman failed to put in place a routine to ensure her son attended school. This had a knock-on effect on a speech and language service provided to the boy who attended five out of nine of those sessions since November.

The school principal had given evidence of learning and development delay which was “inextricably linked” to the child’s attendance.

Pleading for leniency, the defence said teachers agreed the boy was bright, enjoyed school and seemed happy.

An older sibling of the boy was thought to have anxiety and depression and it had been difficult for the mother to get that child to school as well. Sometimes the eight-year-old boy mimicked that behaviour, counsel said.

He had also needed to get his tonsils taken out, the court heard. Counsel said health problems impacted on the boy’s ability to go to school.

The barrister said the woman was the sole carer for her children and was doing her best, the defence pleaded.

TheJournal.ie is a full participating member of the Press Council of Ireland and supports
the Office of the Press Ombudsman. This scheme in addition to defending the freedom of the
press, offers readers a quick, fair and free method of dealing with complaints that they may
have in relation to articles that appear on our pages. To contact the Office of the
Press Ombudsman Lo-Call 1890 208 080 or go to
www.pressombudsman.ie
or www.presscouncil.ie

Please note that TheJournal.ie uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. For more information on cookies please refer to our cookies policy.

Journal Media does not control and is not responsible for user created content, posts, comments, submissions or preferences. Users are reminded that they are fully responsible for their own created content and their own posts, comments and submissions and fully and effectively warrant and indemnify Journal Media in relation to such content and their ability to make such content, posts, comments and submissions available. Journal Media does not control and is not responsible for the content of external websites.