Sunday, December 02, 2007

Detaining Undocumented Immigrants: Both Sides of the Issue. Political Stands.

Undocumented immigrants, including children, are subject to deportation at any time. "Deportation" means forced removal from the United States. In addition, legal immigrants who commit certain crimes can become deportable upon conviction. Deportable Immigrants are often detained in a jail or jail-like setting until deportation can take place. The problem is that the United States has so many deportable Undocumented in custody at any given time, that they cannot physically or financially afford to send everyone home instantly. Sometimes the homelands of the deportable aliens will not accept their citizens back. This causes additional delays. Therefore, some immigrants languish in jail for years and years awaiting deportation. Including children. Terror suspects have also been held indefinitely, without judicial process, legal representation or any sort of time frame to rely on.

Current Status

In June of 2001, in Zadvydas v. Davis, et al, 121 S. Ct. 2491, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the then-INS (currently the USCIS) could not indefinitely detain individuals who have been ordered removed from the U.S. but who cannot be repatriated to their homelands. However, exceptions continued to be made whenever removal within 90 days became impossible.

In April of 2003 Attorney General John D. Ashcroft defended and asserted the rights of the U.S. government to hold deportable Immigrants indefinitely. He released this far-reaching decision as he denied bail to an 18-year old Haitian migrant who had escaped Haiti and come to Florida by boat to seek asylum. Ashcroft maintained that Undocumented Immigrants do not have due process rights.

The Bush administration continues to hold this position.

Background

While most people think of suspected terrorists when they hear the term "detainee," in fact, thousands upon thousands of Undocumented Immigrants, including children, are detained every year, and most have "only" committed the crime of being here Undocumented. Many people perceive illegal crossing to be a crime just as serious as theft or assault.

A sweeping 1996 immigration law, signed by Bill Clinton, retroactively made any green card holder who had committed even certain minor crimes immediately deportable. These people were often held indefinitely, sometimes being detained and deported because of, for example, a drug charge stemming back 15 years when they were in high school. Since 1996, some lawmakers have moved to soften this law, saying it targeted many of the wrong people. However, at the same time, the 9/11 terror attacks have contributed to harsher legal stance toward Undocumented Immigrants, and immigrants in general, as evidenced by all the secretive and indefinite detentions of 9/11 terror suspects.

The Supreme Court decided in June of 2004 that terror suspects have a right to dispute the grounds of their detention.

All the issues surrounding terror suspects, detention and deportation continue to be debated by lawmakers

Arguments For

We cannot simply let Undocumented escape back into society. They are held until arrangements can be made to send them home. And, in many cases, it is a matter of national security, even if that refers to simply stemming the tide of future Undocumented immigration. Most conservatives believe that going easy on Undocumented Immigrants(i.e., letting them go on bail or bond), will encourage others to attempt coming here illegally as well. It may also teach criminal Immigrants that they can break U.S. laws and still stay in the country.

Arguments Against

It is inhumane to hold people in jail when there is no criminal trial pending and no sentence involved. Thousands of children who accompany their parents into the U.S. illegally are sent to youth prisons, housed with child murderers and drug dealers, and denied fundamental human rights. Some commit suicide. The vast majority of these detainees are from countries not even remotely linked to terrorism.

During the 2004 Presidential Campaign, Governor John Kerry (D-Mass)supported "restoring the discretion of immigration judges to evaluate cases on an individual basis and grant relief to deserving immigrants and their families." Most representatives in his party agree with this stance.

Share it

Pro Immigrant News

Search This Blog

Cutting jobs increasing the cost of war.

Welcome to my blog of Pro Inmigrant

I Started this blog because the frustration, confrontation and division creating by xenophobics against minorities.Some have eyes but cannot see,""Some have tongues but cannot speak the truth.They have ears but can't hear.That's where the problem is."It will be some controversial issues but true hurts.This is a Non-Profit Blog . Humanity is priceless

About Me

Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.
The greatest threat facing America today is not terrorism, or foreign economic competition, or immigration. The greatest threat facing America today is the disastrous fiscal policies of our own government, marked by shameless deficit spending and Federal Reserve currency devaluation.
In my fight for Equal Justice
I am not a Republican
-I am not a Democrat
-I am not an Independent
-I am an Mexican American.
And refuse to fall for false reassurances and the tempting comforts of ignorance,
To contribute my voice in outrage, when others are forced into silence,
To speak the truth as I find it.

Fair Use Notice

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.FAIR ml.