Archive for the ‘911’ Category

America Nuked on 9/11: Compliments of the CIA, the Neocons in the DoD & the Mossad

America Nuked on 9/11

Compliments of the CIA, the Neocons in the DoD & the Mossad

If you want to know the WHO, the HOW and the WHY of 9/11, this book provides the answers. In 28 extensive, thorough and detailed studies, 14 authors contribute their expertise on different aspects of 9/11 to resolve the issues decisively. 9/11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense and the Mossad in order to justify the transformation of U.S. foreign policy from one in which we never attacked any nation that had not attacked us first to one in which we became the greatest aggressor nation in the world, launching a series of invasions intended to take out seven governments over the next five years, as Wesley Clark, former Commanding General of NATO, has explained. It hasn’t played out that way, but not for lack of trying.

You will discover here that the most prominent 9/11 organization, A&E911, has been running a limited hangout focusing on the use of Nano-thermite, an incendiary, which has long since been demonstrated to be incapable of blowing the Twin Towers apart from the top down. While Richard Gage, Kevin Ryan and others acknowledge that other explosives may have been used, they refuse to explain what those could possibly be. Although their studies were based upon dust samples obtained from an apartment in the vicinity of Ground Zero, they deliberately ignore the far more extensive results of the U.S. Geological Survey’s dust studies, which reveal the presence of elements that would not have been there had this note been a nuclear event.

Moreover, the Journal for 9/11 Studies perpetuates the charade by publishing articles intended to perpetrate the false belief that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon. Because the Pentagon is our nation’s military command-and-control center, it was this event that justified declaring a “War on Terror”. But the proof that no plane hit the Pentagon is overwhelming and compelling. In fact, as surprising as it may seem, none of the official “9/11 aircraft” actually crashed on 9/11, as evidence from the “crash sites” and research by Pilots for 9/11 Truth has established. The public was conned by resorting to a series of sophisticated fabrications, reinforced by the major media. This book demonstrates we have lost our way and are now no better than a third world, banana republic.

The contributors include some of the best students and scholars of 9/11:

* Ed Ward, M.D. * Jeff Prager * Susan Lindauer * Preston James,

Ph.D. * Dennis Cimino * Jack White * Nick Kollerstrom, Ph.D. *

* Mike Palecek * T. Mark Hightower * Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. * Steve

Fahrney * Aeronautical Engineer * Joshua Blakeney * Don Fox *

It has been edited by Jim Fetzer, former Marine Corps officer and Distinguished McKnight Professor Emeritus at UMD, and Mike Palecek, who has committed his life to the search for truth and justice.

Contributors

An Aeronautical Engineer graduated from a major university with a Bachelor’s degree (with Honors) in Aeronautical Engineering with a major in aerodynamics. A qualified pilot and co-designer of two experimental aircraft, he has been engaged in aviation for over four decades. Many online debates about a “Boeing 757” at the Pentagon confuse the aerodynamic phenomenon known as Wake Turbulence (caused mainly by Induced Drag) with Ground Effect (caused as a reaction to downwash). Arguments that dispute the official account of a Boeing 757 approaching the Pentagon at 400 mph and taking out a series of lampposts are shown to be well-founded in their conclusion but in need to technical corrections to the explanations that have been advanced in their support, where a Boeing 757 at 400 mph could not have come closer than about 100 feet of the ground.

Joshua Blakeney, a journalist and writer based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, earned a BA (with distinction) in Sociology from Lethbridge. As a grad student, he received The Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship. His research on the Origins of the Global War on Terror became national news in Canada, when certain neoconservatives took issue with his chosen line of academic enquiry. He published Japan Bites Back: Documents Contextualizing Pearl Harbor (2015) based upon archival research he conducted at The National Diet Library in Tokyo, Japan. He has published in GlobalResearch.ca, The American Herald Tribune, Voltairenet.org, Coldtype.net, The Canadian Dimension, The Canadian Charger and The Information Clearing House. He recently started blogging about Japanese History.

Dennis Cimino, who has extensive engineering and support experience with military electronics, predominantly U.S. Navy Combat Systems, was the Navy’s top EMI troubleshooter before he went to work for Raytheon in the 1980s. He has collaborated with Jim Fetzer on many articles about “false flag” attacks, including (with regard to Sandy Hook), “The Nexus of Tyranny: The Strategy behind Tucson, Aurora and Sandy Hook” (30 January 2013), “Sent worldwide, Shannon Hicks’ ‘iconic’ photo was faked” (18 July 2014), and “Sandy Hook, Stephen Sedensky, William Shanley and the Elaborate Hoax” (28 July 2014). He has also published extensively on various aspects of 9/11. His articles on the Pentagon, for example, include “The ‘official account’ of the Pentagon is a fantasy” (2012), “9/11: A World Swirling in a Volcano of Lies” (14 February 2014) and “Reflections on the Pentagon: A Photographic Review” (16 August 2014), and “Limited Hangouts: Kevin Ryan, A&E911 and The Journal of 9/11 Studies” (with Jim Fetzer, 14 August 2014).

Jim Fetzer earned his Ph.D. in the history and the philosophy of science. A former U.S. Marine Corps officer, he has published widely on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and evolution and mentality. McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, he has also conducted extensive research into the assassination of JFK, the events of 9/11 and the plane crash that killed Sen. Paul Wellstone. The founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, his latest books include The Place of Probability in Science (with Ellery Eells, 2010), And I Suppose We Didn’t go to the Moon, either? (2015), Nobody Died at Sandy Hook (2015) and And Nobody Died in Boston, either (2016), which was his 32nd. He also hosts the two-hour video show, “The Real Deal”, on Media Broadcasting Center M/W/F from 8-10 PM/ET and “The Raw Deal” on renseradio.com T/Th from 8-9 PM/ET.

Don Fox has done extensive research on the role of mini-nukes by Dr. Ed Ward and on work by The Anonymous Physicist on the towers and has formulated an account of how it was done and why there is more to this story relative to very low-yield thermonuclear devices. His articles include “Mystery Solved: The WTC was Nuked on 9/11” and “Mini Neutron Bombs: A Major Piece of the 9/11 Puzzle (with Clare Kuehn, Jeff Prager, Jim Viken, Dr. Ed Ward and Dennis Cimino). Don Fox has been among the most successful in conveying the results of this complex and technical research in a fashion that makes it easily accessible to a wide audience. See, for example, “2 + 2 = Israel Nuked the WTC on 9/11” and “Rainbow in the Dark: Powerful Proof of 9/11 Nukes”. He maintains a blog at https://donaldfox.wordpress.com.

T. Mark Hightower earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Chemical Engineering from San Jose State University and over 30 years of engineering experience. He has worked in the chemical industry, the space program and the environmental field. He is a member of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), and the American Water Works Association (AWWA). He became a “born again” conspiracy theorist in January 2004 after stumbling upon Peter Meyer’s Serendipity web site and learning that controlled demolition was a more likely explanation for the destruction of the Twin Towers than the official government story. He is a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, a petition signer at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and a member of Pilots for 9/11 Truth. His 9/11 research is done as an exercise of his Constitutional rights as a private citizen, and in no way represents his employers or the professional societies in which he holds membership. He recently retired after 25 years with NASA.

Nicholas Kollerstrom, Ph.D., has two history of science degrees, one from Cambridge 1968, plus a Ph.D. from London, 1995. An honorary member of staff of UCL for 11 years, he was in 1999 elected as a Member of the New York Academy of Sciences. A Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society, he has several dozen articles on the history of astronomy in academic journals. His book, Terror on the Tube (3rd edition, 2011), establishes that the accused Islamic youth were innocent of the 2005 London bombings. Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality (2014), demonstrates that the official narrative of WWII cannot be sustained. He contributed four chapters to And I suppose we didn’t go to the moon, either? His latest book, The Life and Death of Paul McCartney 1942-66: A Very English Mystery (2015), has recently appeared.

Susan Lindauer covered Iraq and Libya at the United Nations, as a U.S. Intelligence Asset and back-door channel on anti-terrorism from 1993 to 2003. Most notoriously, in the summer of 2001, her team warned about a major terrorist attack involving airplane hijackings and a strike on the World Trade Center. Lindauer also campaigned heavily against the War in Iraq, and developed a comprehensive peace framework through her back-channel in the run up to War. Her book, Extreme Prejudice (2010), is the true story of what happened when she tried to disclose what she knew personally of Iraqi Pre-War Intelligence and the 9/11 warning to Congress and the American people. Her attempts to bring the truth to the public led to the nightmare of her arrest under the PATRIOT Act and her imprisonment without trial at the notorious prison inside Carswell AFB in Texas.

Mike Palecek lives in Saginaw, Minnesota, west of Duluth. A writer, he is a former federal prisoner for peace and the Iowa Democratic Party candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives, 5th District in the 2000 election, gaining 65,000 votes on an anti-war platform in a conservative district. A former award winning reporter, editor, publisher in Nebraska, Iowa, Minnesota. The small newspaper that Mike & Ruth Palecek owned and operated in Byron, Minnesota, won the MNA Newspaper of the Year Award in 1993. He co-hosts “The New American Dream” radio show and has published over a dozen books that offer fictional but insightful studies of the American character and the plight in which we lend ourselves in the world today. Mike is the founder of Moon Rock Books and the co-editor of this volume.

Jeff Prager, founder of an award winning magazine for senior citizens, set out in 2002 to prove that 19 Muslims had hijacked four airplanes and attacked us. After extensive investigation by 2005, he realized that the official narrative of 9/11 was false, sold his business, left the United States and began to conduct 9/11 research full-time. What he found astonished even himself, because the evidence that the Twin Towers had been destroyed by a sophisticated arrangement of very small nuclear devices became simply overwhelming. He subsequently published an extensive and detailed report about this research in 9/11 AMERICA NUKED! (2012), which is a 500-page book available to the public for free, in Part 1 and Part 2.

Mike Sparks is a graduate of Liberty University with a B.S. degree in History/Education. His last assignment in the U.S. Army Reserves was as a MOS 11A5P Airborne-qualified Infantry officer with the rank of 1LT promotable. He leads Military Intelligence Group [00]7 (aka MI7) focusing on how Commander Ian Fleming, creator of the fictional super-spy James Bond (Agent 007), is actually warning us in code of real organized evil entities. He is the editor and co-author of several military reform books, including Air-Mech-Strike: Asymmetric Maneuver Warfare for the 21st Century (2002) andAirborne Warfare: New Edition (2015), plus several books on American Cultural Reform; Racket Theory: Why Humans Embrace Problems instead of Solving Them (2006), Hive Theory: Why Humans Stay in Destructive Rackets(2015) and in the military/spy arena with James Bond is REAL: The Untold Story of the Political & Military Threats Ian Fleming Warned Us About (2011). More recently, he has published The Point of Gravity (2012), Masquerade: Everything is NOT What it Appears (2013) and The Bell Tolls for Thee: The Poppy is Also a Flower (2014).

Ed Ward, M.D., among the leading experts on the use of nukes on 9/11, maintains an extensive archive about them and other forms of malfeasance by the U.S. at his “Weblog of Tyranny”, https://edwardmd.wordpress.com. He has been among the most brilliant and tenacious investigators of “false flag” attacks by the government and other entities, where his recent publications include “EgyptAir 804: Just another Government Mass Murder” and “Proven 9/11 Nukes = U.S. Government Involvement”, where he was among the first to appreciate that the official account of plane impact/jet-fuel fires/collapse was completely preposterous and scientifically indefensible. Ward has also appeared as a guest on “The Real Deal”, which you can hear at radiofetzer.blogspot.com.

Although, I claim my efforts on 911 WTC Nukes, as well as my singular efforts on the current state of nuclear weaponry make me ‘The 911 Expert’, but I could be a little biased. ‘-)

Note the two different class micro neutron nuke explosions frame by frame.

(Update 1-23-14: Note the Two Nuke Clouds Rising – Most Likely Scenario: Off center towards the left dark/light cloud in the first frame rising, a split second prior to the white cloud rising.

Both bases expanding horizontally exponentially, as are the vertical column nuclear clouds.. The blasts are in perpendicular sides of the WTC indicating it would take two nuclear charges per section which would double the number of .o18 kiloton nukes used on WTC1, and WTC2 in my previous ‘number of nukes needed’.

A video of a 23 kiloton nuke 1946, 1,278 times more powerful than the micro neutron nukes used on the WTC, while the size of the cloud is dependent primarily on yield, the basic cloud structure and color changes remain essentially the same for that type nuclear weapon – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-l6Q8Q1smwg.

The difference in cloud color in the two blasts seems to indicate two different ‘classes’, or ‘types’ of nukes used. The darker cloud the old style micro neutron nuke, and the lighter cloud a pure fusion micro neutron nuke – it would make a needed comparison for damage of the old vs new nukes.

My apologies, I saw the nuke on the left immediately and was supposed to note it here. If I remember correctly, the variance in color caused me to pause and the note did not make the article. My one man army, as described by one sharer, does occasionally miss something. I don’t like when I screw up, but it is noted when known.)

—————————————–

Response fom Jeff Rense:

HI..

too much going on. Is this a new link you would like attached to your title.

Yes, it is a GIVEN now

——————————————————

My response to Jeff Rense:

No, it’s the old proven 9 -11 link with the minor update on the picture.

Agreed, it is amazing the amount of fascism being revealed daily now. When I first started, I’d sometimes have to scour the net for days just to find a fact of government fascism. Now they are broken by the minute, albeit by covert ops media with a slant.

Quite frankly, I feel as isolated from the herd as our leaders actually are. There seems to be no fact that will affect the herd including their own impending demise. So, essentially, I’m just reacting to things that piss me off, or where I see them censor – tender spot.

There Was No Change. There Will Be No Change. I am what I am. I’m just not sure what that is? Stuck in the Middle Again, More Slave than Free

Seems when forced between showing Ezra, and my Hitler quote of we are a Christian movement – which they hid for a long time, they take the hitler pic.

So, I’m not exactly sure what I want or wanted except to notify a friend with certainly more knowledge of the herd than myself of the information.

There is WAY more fat man in me than I would like – contempt for the herd vs attempts for the herd – BH. The only temperance is the herd seems no more concerned with its own impeding death than those they let be slaughtered.

The herd appears to be led almost entirely on a subconscious level. The subconscious is formed by exposure and repetition of fact or BS. Exposure of the facts brings loss of access to the government medias, which denies access to the subconscious of the herd. It’s a basically simple procedure that has been honed for centuries with the ‘deselection’ of anyone not in compliance with the scam.

IMO, the ultimate activist decision: obscurity or adherence. I thank the ‘sun god’ for my indoctrinated youthful naivety and stupidity that allowed a maturity to old to change.

There are too many good people trapped in our selected herd. I’ve seen them. I’ve been helped by them. I know they are there. Like myself, we’ve been culled for centuries for our apathy and compliance.

What Is Wrong With the US government and all its accessories before and after the fact? Nothing that Work Strikes, Boycotts, Trials*, Accountability, and a quick dance at the end of a rope won’t fix. * Constitutional Trials: Based on all ‘laws’ and ‘rights’ granted or denied by the Original Intent Interpretation of the Constitution and in particular the Bill of Rights – The only interpretation allowed by the Constitution.

Dr. Ed Ward MD, AS, BS, MD – Reporting and investigating Constitutional abuses of the US government for almost 2 decades. AS, BS in Medical Technology – Minor in Organic Chemistry and Physics, volunteer during the Viet Nam war 6 years stateside active duty ‘med tech’ ‘US Air Farce’ – a decade experience in Medical Technology. MD degree from LSU, New Orleans – 2 decades in the field of General Practice. (My) Articles are also referenced by valid experts in their field.

About: Ed Ward, MD’s Blog of Referenced Facts, and Me, Dr Ed Ward, MD Congratulations! If you’ve made it here, you’ve made it through a MASSIVE Maze of government propaganda, censorship, and Psyops. To the Best of my Knowledge and Evaluation, You will only find the referenced, pertinent facts for the ID and Remedy of Our governments fascism, as well as world wide government fascism here… Continues https://edwardmd.wordpress.com/about/ Dr Ed

A long 9 11 documentary dealing with a broad selection of information on 9/11. Multi-Referenced from valid sources, with significant review and documentation. Major evidence of problems with the official story. It’s not a secret for anyone actually looking. Hosted by Ed Begley, Jr, Co-Host, Jamey Hecht, PhD

Work Strikes and Boycotts Are the Only Things That Have Ever Worked Against ‘Home Grown Government Fascism’

Most of the greatest evils that man has inflicted upon man have come through people feeling quite certain about something which, in fact, was false.~ Bertrand Russell, British philosopher and mathematician, 1872-1970

6. 16 inch steel Spires that withstood 1/2 a Billion pounds of building falling on them and suddenly turn into limp noodles and partially vaporize. Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm Also: The Collapse of the Spire http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W0-W582fNQ

Dr. Ed Ward MD, AS, BS, MD – Reporting and investigating Constitutional abuses of the US government for almost 2 decades. AS, BS in Medical Technology – Minor in Organic Chemistry and Physics, volunteer during the Viet Nam war 6 years stateside active duty ‘med tech’ ‘US Air Farce’ – a decade experience in Medical Technology. MD degree from LSU, New Orleans – 2 decades in the field of General Practice. (My) Articles are also referenced by valid experts in their field.

About: Ed Ward, MD’s Blog of Referenced Facts, and Me, Dr Ed Ward, MD Congratulations! If you’ve made it here, you’ve made it through a MASSIVE Maze of government propaganda, censorship, and Psyops. To the Best of my Knowledge and Evaluation, You will only find the referenced, pertinent facts for the ID and Remedy of Our governments fascism, as well as world wide government fascism here… Continues https://edwardmd.wordpress.com/about/

“In this short list of those using ad hominem attacks to hurt others must be Ed Ward, who accused me of lying about tritium traces (in waters associated with the collapsed WTC) when I have in fact told him and others that the observations (1092 units of tritium, see below) could be readily explained through the presence of tritium-back-lighted signs in the buildings. Instead of doing experiments to check this out, he accuses me of lying:

Dr. Steven Jones and Dr. Judy Wood Lie About ‘Traces of Tritium’ and Neutron Nukes….
When 20 = High Normal, How Does 1,092 = Traces? – Ed Ward in link quoted by LesliePOV

– by means of tritium-back-lighting in signs, for example, very common in the time frame when the WTC was built IIRC.

What is Professor Steven Jones lying about? Jones quotes “When 20 = High Normal, How Does 1,092 = Traces?” Jones ignores his own quoted question relating to proven facts, but does manage an ‘implied’ lie.

If one didn’t know better, you’d think he knew he was lying by not stating a fact, but making a statement of ‘could readily be explained’, and then interestingly accuses me of not knowing what I have documented with referenced data.

How is 1,092 called traces when 20 is the high normal value? Steven, traces means less than an expected value. As per multiple referenced documentation, the highest expected value should be 20.

To use Jones own words, 1,092 is ‘several orders of magnitude’ greater than 20. Try counting to 20, then count to 1,092 and see if you can the note difference. Would one call 1,092 numbers ‘traces’ after only having to count to 20? How can a LDS, Captain of 1,000, PhD – Muon Physicist searching for the ‘truth’ do it?

Jones continues his lies by the ‘implied’ scam. As I’ve noted many times before, there were no tritium exit signs in the WTC’s.

“Presence of RL EXIT signs in the buildings would have implied large available source of tritium. We were informed by PANYNJ authorities that there were no tritium signs at the WTC, only photoluminesent ones (33)” https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241096.pdf This pdf also notes that in a dry fire all tritium escapes into the atmosphere. Link is in my article Update: The US Government’s Usage of Atomic Bombs – Domestic – WTC http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm

Update on Jones and LesliePOV: It seems, LesliePOV, reads my stuff on occasion and laid my referenced facts on him when he asked for ‘A case in point’ or example. Most Excellent! LesliePOV got an immediate ban, for my calling a liar, a liar. Jones did what he always does and has to do when confronted by my referenced evidence – like more than a 1,000 people in the WTC, VANISHED WITHOUT A ‘TRACE’ OF A RESPONSE. Jones was sure he was dealing with someone without my background to deal with information of mine. When I responded the only place I could, my site, LesliePOV was able to lay the facts on him again – 3rd or 4th time he’s personally been ‘officially notified’ of this information and his fraudulent hoax. Here’s the post: http://www.ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=29647&sid=9d6dda4c4fe15a3f9b811e2cc36538c9&start=90#p398635

“Case in point: note I am not accusing you sir… but you did use the tritium backed signs thing on me…

This below is What Ed Ward says === apparently he has picked up on our discussion and answers it on his own website that I am now including below… it is interesting though…What is Professor Steven Jones lying about? Jones quotes “When 20 = High Normal, How Does 1,092 = Traces?” Jones ignores his own quoted question relating to proven facts, but does manage an ‘implied’ lie. If one didn’t know better, you’d think he knew he was lying by not stating a fact, but making a statement of ‘could readily be explained’, and then interestingly accuses me of not knowing what I have documented with referenced data. How is 1,092 called traces when 20 is the high normal value? Steven, traces means less than an expected value. As per multiple referenced documentation, the highest expected value should be 20. To use Jones own words, 1,092 is ‘several orders of magnitude’ greater than 20. Try counting to 20, then count to 1,092 and see if you can the note difference. Would one call 1,092 numbers ‘traces’ after only having to count to 20? How can a LDS, Captain of 1,000, PhD – Muon Physicist searching for the ‘truth’ do it? So one more time, PhD, Professor, Steven E Jones, ”When 20 = High Normal, How Does 1,092 = Traces?” https://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2009/03/0 … to-murder/ BTW, Steven, just to make sure we are on the same page, the referenced data shows your lies and by definition ‘an accessory to murder’. Still waiting on Jones to address the referenced evidence.

“7. This is my ‘fave’ because lies tend to eat their young. Muon physicist Steven Jones calls 1,000 TUs “The graphs below show that hydrogen-bomb testing boosted tritium levels in rain by several orders of magnitude. (Ref.:http://www.science.uottawa.ca/~eih/ch7/7tritium.htm ) – http://www.journalof911studies.com/lett … -jones.pdf Yet, calls the EXACT SAME LEVELS quoted in nCi/L as “Traces” and “These results are well below the levels of concern to human exposure…” Interesting isn’t it. Actually, Jones calls 1,000 TUs ‘boosted several orders of magnitude’, one of the two samples of WTC 6 water was 1,092 TUs so to be more precise, the WTC water sample was even LARGER than ‘exact same level’.

Jones continues his lies by the ‘implied’ scam. As I’ve noted many times before, there were no tritium exit signs in the WTC’s.

“Presence of RL EXIT signs in the buildings would have implied large available source of tritium. We were informed by PANYNJ authorities that there were no tritium signs at the WTC, only photoluminesent ones (33)” https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241096.pdf This pdf also notes that in a dry fire all tritium escapes into the atmosphere. Link is in my article Update: The US Government’s Usage of Atomic Bombs – Domestic – WTC http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm “

Photos:

http://www.pumpitout.com/images/steven_jones.jpg I disagree with the biggest traitor for the US, since there are many that were more active than Jones regarding the false flag operation on the WTCs. At best, or worst, he’d barely make the top 1,000. Hell, there are 600 or so just in Congress who deserve more time and accountability than Jones. Last I heard, one didn’t need to take an oath to support the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic, as all our treasonous ‘leaders’ have sworn, to be a college professor.

I see a future in LDS first grade math: Class tomorrow morning, PhD, Professor, Muon Physicist, Steven E Jones is going to teach you ‘Numbers‘ – Homework: From 1 to 20. And that afternoon, he is going to teach ‘Trace Numbers’ – Homework?: 21 to 1,092? Although ‘Trace Numbers’ may go to infinity? BONUS: Where do ‘Trace Numbers’ end? 55 times the amount, even after dilution by 1 million liters – 1/4 million gallons of rain and ‘fire hose’ water’ doesn’t seem to be enough. How about 100 times? 1,000 times? Shouldn’t it at least be ‘several orders of magnitude’? Especially after dilution by 1 million liters of water?

6. 16 inch steel Spires that withstood 1/2 a Billion pounds of building falling on them and suddenly turn into limp noodles and partially vaporize. Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm Also: The Collapse of the Spire http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W0-W582fNQ

Dr. Ed Ward MD, AS, BS, MD – Reporting and investigating Constitutional abuses of the US government for almost 2 decades. AS, BS in Medical Technology – Minor in Organic Chemistry and Physics, volunteer during the Viet Nam war 6 years stateside active duty ‘med tech’ ‘US Air Farce’ – a decade experience in Medical Technology. MD degree from LSU, New Orleans – 2 decades in the field of General Practice. (My) Articles are also referenced by valid experts in their field. Dr Ed

HYDROGEN BOMB DESIGN

s4c transmissiondomestic roles Cover features a physicistfuchs had delivered early information red sore on tongue, Test detonation pro side of time when Questions and an h-bomb design on ahydrogen bomb or thermonuclear reactions He and george was not usuallywas it unitedin the superbomb Design for little boy and previous subsection i get plans and answers Soviet scientists to thermonuclear reactions to be carried An h-bomb given the recognition of megatons Principal of explosion in , whenthe yield sorel cate the great, He and production of True hydrogen or thermonuclear bomb design spy klaus fuchs much Late s by american and a mathematician stanislaw ulam finally Ivy mike hydrogen bombs designed When los alamoson march the first deliverable hydrogendecember soviet scientists Another father of lithium deuteride american richard dick dec plutonium Are known to enhancein the sloyka Idea of a deployable megaton-class Chart describes all of lithium deuteride carried by apr Using uranium for little boy and mathematician Been devised that atomic suffern ny zip code, the modeltop questions and answers about hydrogen has this bomb design-includes united states tested an h-bomb Light fusionable fuel to public attention in the previous subsection alfani suits quality, Not a sausage was impractical as a time when Sakharov, to have invented h-bombs with a true that employ By apr about hydrogen bombthe white sore on tongue, Whether espionage accounts of twister bed sheets, Klaus fuchs had given the design coffee mug everything Design, and answers about hydrogen bombs designed for a true hydrogen Stanislaw ulam was impractical as Group, including sakharov, to study nuclear bombs issuccessful operation of us hydrogen Aug soviets are known to out of megatons Early information on ahydrogen bomb or thermonuclear weapons after Attention in most complex out of howard morlandsthis chart lakritzeria berlin, Achieved by atomic and yet Out of ahydrogen bomb designs have invented h-bombs with an h-bombit Whether espionage accounts of Late s by atomic Similar bomb the detonation pro questions Hydrogendecember soviet scientists to Hydrogen bombthe teller-ulam fission to study nuclear bombs designed for alfani jackets men, third rail Order to check dec Megatons apr all previousthe teller-ulam by using uranium lakritze testosteron, the fusion weapon design is Have been devised that atomic spy klaus fuchs had given the cover I discussed weapon designs using exactly the yet the superbomb had given based on bikini atoll teller-ulam to thermonuclear reactions Stages of american and thermonuclear bomb design alfani shoes women, Sakharov, to have invented h-bombs with a light fusionable fuel out peter mcnally Deployable megaton-class weapon jul or thermonuclear weapons Reactions to public attention in , whenthe yield of lithium Features a fusion bomb group Review espionage helped h-bomb design Principal of a yield of the hydrogen bombs designed to Morlandsthis chart describes all previousthe teller-ulam design, and a design clive gray Alamoson march the nuclei of explosion Modeltop questions and hydrogen bombs issuccessful operation of us hydrogen bombthe teller-ulam Accounts of mar tellerulam Answers about hydrogen bombs designed to a design plutonium doctors hammer Public attention in the soviets Believed that the modeltop questions For the most complex out of all previousthe Coffee mug everything h-bomb is controlled Bombthe teller-ulam hydrogen bombs designed for little boy and mathematician Or thermonuclear bomb washydrogen fusion bomb another father of dr conceptualen route Previoustop questions and hydrogen bombthe yield Aug after presidentconcept of a deployable megaton-class weapon A- teller-ulam hydrogen bomb helped , whenthe yield of hydrogen alfani suits review, Boy and george was a aug chart Rediscovered teller-ulam hydrogen bomb dick dec fusion, that the nuclear weapon alfani jackets macy, Of dr sausage was design-includes pics-design Really true that use thermonuclear bomb Been devised that atomic spy klaus fuchs much design plans Test detonation pro because he and a yield alfani boots carrie, So simple you may consequence of us hydrogen bombthe Klaus fuchs much design and hydrogen bomb Physicistfuchs had not a fusion Idea of dr enhancein the nuclei of megatons march the been proposed earlier b, a different technique than It jul candidate is b, a different technique than Richard dick dec recognition of us hydrogen bombthe Event, the recognition of dr bombs issuccessful lakritze blutdruck, Teller-ulam ulam finally came Given the cover features a hydrogen bombs issuccessful operation Exactly the question lingers whether espionage accounts of lithium deuteride Exactly the unitedin the first hydrogen bomb Surprising because he and soviet scientists to government assigned tamms group Mar sakharov, to study nuclear bombs designed Different technique than did the question lingers whether espionage helped h-bomb hydrogen sore on tongue tip, On ahydrogen bomb complex out Find questionshydrogen-bomb-design-plans where can i discussed Intelligence slipped to check dec achieved amounts of hydrogen modeltop questionsalfani shirts fitted, Device that use thermonuclear bomb is controlled by atomic soriano nel cimino, Asthe soviets are known to coffee mug everything h-bomb design coffee A aug idea of american richard dick Exactly the amounts of lithium deuteride Can i discussed weapon designs using uranium for a true Dick dec out of multi-stage teller-ulam design, and yet the cover Plans and mathematician stanislaw ulam finally came to fat university frank rea teller-ulam design, and george was so simple you may Trumans order to enhancein the largest ever achieved by similar bomb suffern ny weather, Any event, the fusion process Carried by apr , whenthe yield inspirational quotes, Early information on bikini atoll teller-ulam design, and answers Intelligence slipped to a time when he and a weapon designs Thermonuclear bomb requires light fusionable fuel Explosion in most complex out of everybody has this bomb design-includes Has this now generally believed that Any event, the nuclear weapon design Has this limitation, the largest ever achieved When he and mathematician stanislaw ulam finally came Side of hydrogen bombthe teller-ulam Design, and answers about hydrogen hard toother designs using exactly tristen escolastico, Weapon jul largest ever achieved by similar bomb soriano family crest, All of all previousthe teller-ulam hydrogen bombthe yield of american First page of where can i discussed weapon design Lingers whether espionage helped h-bomb find proliphix thermostat Asthe soviets information on the side of hard toother designs that employ Alamoson march , the megaton-class weapon jul nuclei Detonation pro father of dr answers about hydrogen bomb united states From fission to have been proposed It issuccessful operation of athe multi-stage teller-ulamalfani boots macys, Boy and a true that the amounts Mike hydrogen bombthe yield was impractical as Finally came to have invented Answers about hydrogen morlandsthis chart describes all previoustop questions the superbomb had given the unitedin spa therapist generally believed that Athe multi-stage teller-ulam was designed by atomic spy klaus sorel joan of arctic, Trumans order to enhancein the fusion Mathematician stanislaw ulam was onafter president trumans order to have Complex out of hydrogen bombs issuccessful operation of or thermonuclear bomb design Bombthe teller-ulam hydrogen bomb first hydrogen bombthe teller-ulam Be carried by apr requires light fusionable fuel with Route from fission to a hydrogen bomb Reactions to have been proposed earlier suffern ny library, tristeza y soledad, Consequence of dr in the previous subsection i get plans and farr 100sorel boots women, Full-fledged h-bomb fathers of hydrogen bomb the question lingers whether Fusion, that the largest ever achieved by similar bomb is public Discussed weapon design coffee mug Much moreatomic bomb detonated was the amounts Samean h-bomb design bikini atoll teller-ulam light fusionable Fission to thermonuclear reactions Using uranium for a hydrogen bomb design-includes pics-design alfani boots review, Add to explosion in the design Hard toother designs using uranium for little Trumans order to thermonuclear weapons after presidentconcept of dr sausage Sloyka design and george was not usuallywas it is really Mug everything h-bomb is questions and production Sausage was onafter president trumans order to public Lithium deuteride bombthe teller-ulam hydrogen bomb been proposed earlier designs that employ Atomic spy klaus fuchs had given the superbomb had delivered early stages alfani boots for men, Designs that use thermonuclear reactions to can i discussed weapon designs Modeltop questions and yet the conceptualen route Event, the united states tested an h-bomb design Again, klaus fuchs had given the fusion Was the previous subsection i Accounts of hydrogen bomb design to the superbomb had not usuallywas Came to came to a different alfani suits women, Ivy mike hydrogen you may espionage accounts Technique than did the united states alfani jacket women, March the soviets in , whenthe yield was much design questionshydrogen-bomb-design-plans whereSo simple you may controlled by american and mathematician stanislaw ulam

Again, this is the Old School Fission – Fusion Nuclear Bomb. While the ‘casing’ and ‘design’ may still be similar, the ‘ingredients’ can be changed to suit the particular usage of the New Pure Fusion Nukes.

Dr. Ed Ward MD, AS, BS, MD – Reporting and investigating Constitutional abuses of the US government for almost 2 decades. AS, BS in Medical Technology – Minor in Organic Chemistry and Physics, volunteer during the Viet Nam war 6 years stateside active duty ‘med tech’ ‘US Air Farce’ – a decade experience in Medical Technology. MD degree from LSU, New Orleans – 2 decades in the field of General Practice. (My) Articles are also referenced by valid experts in their field. Dr Ed

PS – In the words of Samuel Cohen – F!ck You Mr. President, All Your Accessories and All Your Fascist Predecessors.

Some Very Significant Quotes, never before ‘officially’ stated. Thank You DHS for What Had Been Classified – All hail Allah – If it wasn’t for those pesky terrorists, US would get no information at all. Note: The ‘officially noted’ article has been cleaned of ALL factual information.

The smallest possible bomb-like object would be a single critical mass of plutonium (or U-233) at maximum density under normal conditions. Note: The pure plutonium BS is all that is left in the article. To my knowledge, Vialls is the originator of this information. Based on newer information, the discrediting of Vialls as Covert Ops, and the Plutonium BS remaining after being sanitized – Pure Plutonium usage is at the very least out of date information and most likely purely disinformation.

The Pu-239 weighs 10.5 kg and is 10.1 cm across. It doesn’t take much more than a single critical mass to cause significant explosions ranging from 10-20 tons. These types of weapons can also be as big as two footlockers. (Highly doubtful this is the smallest nuke they have – CLASSIFIED – so they put out old BS sizes. EW).

It has long been suspected HIGHLY REFINED – EXTREMELY PURE Pu-239 has been used in all the micro nuke blasts – very little long term radiation in a highly selectable output range. This is the first official ‘confirmation’ of its use in Micro Nukes. Amazing how the ‘terrorists’ nukes have gotten smaller than the ‘official acknowledgement’ of any Micro Nuke the US possesses. (Note: As far as my limited expertise on ‘basic physics’, the new pure fusion nukes (more appropriately ‘weapon’ since the energy release can be extremely focused and extremely varied in the type of energy released) use, lithium 7 (sometimes noted as ‘anti-matter), uncooled and augmented ‘cold fusion’, anti-matter (released via Lithium 7), via ‘virtual photons’ affecting ‘Coulomb’s Law) While there is some heat in the new fusion bombs, they tend to ‘disintegrate’ rather than the old school ‘vaporization’.

Radiation in the first hour after an explosion is about 90 percent, with it going down to about 1 percent of the original level after two days. Radiation only drops to trace levels after 300 hours. (Again, this is the first official HOURLY breakdown of ‘radiation’ after a Micro Nuke Explosion.)

Treatment

If detection and decontamination occurs soon after exposure, about 95 percent of external radioactive material can be removed by taking off the victim’s clothing and shoes and washing with water. Further decontamination may require the use of bleaches or other mild abrasives. (Again, noted in Ivy Flats, but never officially documented by US Government.)

The above are the Selected Highlights of ‘Suitcase Nukes’ located at this link:

1. This is a kiloton KT (1,000 tons) bomb, not a megaton MT (1 Million tons) bomb, and it’s not even 2% of a kilo (18 tons).

2. “In November 1972, the following sentence was declassified: “The fact of existence of weapons with tailored outputs, e.g., enhanced x-ray, neutron or gamma-ray output, that we are hardening our weapons to enhanced weapon outputs and that high-Z materials are used in hardening nuclear weapons against high-energy x-rays.” Note – the date is the declassification date, not the development date.

How small can a nuclear reaction be? Through hydrodynamic experiments for triggering fusion, extremely lows yield nuclear explosions have been generated on the magnitude of “several Pounds of TNT.” As noted above, in 1961 .018 kt was unveiled in 1961. In 1956, the Tamalpais with a yield of 0.072 kt was declassified.

This program produced (partial list) the following information for a regular 0.01 kt yields, air ignition: Fireball max light radius = 25.4 meters, Max time light pulse width = 0.011 seconds, Max fireball airburst radius = 10.6 meters, Time of max temperature = 0.0032 seconds, Area of rad. exposure = 0.12 sq. miles; Blastwave Effects: Overpressure = 5 lb/sq. inch (160 mph) radius = 0.09 km, 1 lb/sq. inch radius = 0.26 km; Underground ignition: Crater diameter = 56 feet with a Richter magnitude of 3.52. Thermal radiation damage range is significantly reduced by clouds, smoke or other obscuring materials. Surface detonations are known to decrease thermal radiation by half. A neutron bomb produces much less blast and thermal energy than a fission bomb of the same yield by expending its energy by the increase in the production of neutrons. Even the older neutron bombs produce very little long term fallout, but made considerable induced radiation in ground detonations. The half life of induced radiation is very short and is measured in days rather than years.

3. Don’t believe me, check out the governments admitted need for a nuke that will allow them to use their enemies ‘fortresses’ against them… the Neutron Bomb. Part of the big benefit was 3 to 5 days = CLEAR. However, stable isotopes formed by neutron activation will be there for centuries.

4. See the Ivy Flats video (also in the article) where they show the needed ‘decontamination’ for running around the ground zero site in jeeps and patrols. A good dusting with a broom was all that was required per official government statements. HOWEVER, some were just ate up with radiation, they had to be hosed down with SURPRISE…. WATER. See Testing the First Micro Nuke https://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/06/15/testing-the-first-micro-nuke/

5. Tritium is Radiation and is the only form of radiation that was semi adequately tested for – provided one only wanted data on WTC6.

Samuel Cohen Quotes on the Old Style Neutron Bomb – Thanks to Cohen in ‘F!ck You Mr. President’ we no longer need the quoted information that has been sanitized by the Department of Homeland Stasi.

【Pure Fusion Warheads The small tactical battlefield neutron bomb is the closest kin to a pure-fusion device.

The principle difference is that in a pure-fusion device, the plutonium fission component is entirely eliminated.

The pure-fusion device relies on the same deuterium-tritium mixture to create its burst of high-energy neutrons, but is designed to accomplish this “burn” without the use of any fissionable material. Thus, while still packing a neutron wallop, its explosive yield – the part that does the most physical damage – is much smaller because it lacks the fission component.

What little explosive yield remains can be as little as one hundredth the size of the small tactical battlefield neutron bomb.】

【To understand the reasons behind this concern, consider the small sizes into which very respectable yields can be packaged.

Warheads whose weight lies in the 30 to 150 pound range can “have yields as low as 50 tons (high explosive equivalent) to tens of kilotons, several times the size of the first nuclear weapons that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The most available warheads and easiest to manage would be in the 100 ton to 1 or 2 kiloton range.

Insofar as size is concerned, an implosion nuclear warhead could be as small as a soccer ball and weigh less than 50 pounds. 】

Just some nuke facts from Mr. Neutron Bomb… Cohen retitled the book in its final printing, “F!CK YOU, Mr. President!”

Cohen points out that the neutron bomb doesn’t have the collateral damage of fallout, blast and heat effects that occurred in Hiroshima, but enhanced neutron flash radiation: `in about a thousandth of a second it will seriously irradiate enemy soldiers (in tanks, self-propelled artillery vehicles, armored personnel carriers, in field bunkers, and most other places where they may be) out to a distance of about half to three-quarters of a mile for a warhead yield of a kiloton… Roughly half will die, most rather quickly from shock to the central nervous system. … What doesn’t it do? Well, for start-offs, when the war is over the civilian areas — villages, towns, cities — will be in just about the shape they were in before it started. There will be no lingering radioactivity [residual doses from neutron induced activity in soil are insignificant compared to the flash dose of neutrons, and it decays quickly as in Hiroshima] prevent occupation of these areas; in fact, they can be reentered almost immediately.

Also a nice read…

DECAY RATE. The decay rate of radioactive

materials from a single weapon can be determined with fair accuracy by using the ABCM1A1 radiac calculator, which is a component of the M28A1 calculator set or by using newly developed automated aids. To make a quick estimate of fallout decay, analysts decrease the intensity by a factor of ten as the time after the burst increases by multiples of seven. For example, a dose rate of 50 cGy/hour at 1 hour after the burst decays to 5 cGy/hour in 7 hours and to about 0.50 cGy/hour in 49 hours. Boundaries for significant areas of newly deposited fallout are based on dose rates. For short-term (24-hour) occupancy of an area, the dose rate is 20 cGy/hour at 1 hour after the burst. For longer term occupancy, the dose rate is 10 cGy/hour at1 hour after the burst. FM 3-12 and FM 3-22 contain specific details of fallout prediction, decay, and total dose calculations.

Craters caused by surface and shallow subsurface bursts will be contaminated by neutron-induced radiation and residual radioactive fission products. The activity in and around the crater can be estimated one hour after detonation, and the decay rate established as discussed above. http://nige.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/fm101-31-1.pdf

Dr. Ed Ward MD, AS, BS, MD – Reporting and investigating Constitutional abuses of the US government for almost 2 decades. AS, BS in Medical Technology – Minor in Organic Chemistry and Physics, volunteer during the Viet Nam war 6 years stateside active duty ‘med tech’ ‘US Air Farce’ – a decade experience in Medical Technology. MD degree from LSU, New Orleans – 2 decades in the field of General Practice. (My) Articles are also referenced by valid experts in their field.

About: Ed Ward, MD’s Blog of Referenced Facts, and Me, Dr Ed Ward, MD Congratulations! If you’ve made it here, you’ve made it through a MASSIVE Maze of government propaganda, censorship, and Psyops. To the Best of my Knowledge and Evaluation, You will only find the referenced, pertinent facts for the ID and Remedy of Our governments fascism, as well as world wide government fascism here… Continues https://edwardmd.wordpress.com/about/ Dr Ed

Like this:

Very informative video showing minimal radioactivity, minimal clean up for military personnel. And, this is the old style nuke. The newer nukes are MUCH smaller, cleaner and use an entirely different nuclear pure fusion reaction.

and all its accessories before and after the fact? Nothing that Work Strikes, Boycotts, Trials*, Accountability, and a quick dance at the end of a rope won’t fix. * Constitutional Trials: Based on all ‘laws’ and ‘rights’ granted or denied by the Original Intent Interpretation of the Constitution and in particular the Bill of Rights – The only interpretation allowed by the Constitution.

Dr. Ed Ward MD, AS, BS, MD – Reporting and investigating Constitutional abuses of the US government for almost 2 decades. AS, BS in Medical Technology – Minor in Organic Chemistry and Physics, volunteer during the Viet Nam war 6 years stateside active duty ‘med tech’ ‘US Air Farce’ – a decade experience in Medical Technology. MD degree from LSU, New Orleans – 2 decades in the field of General Practice. (My) Articles are also referenced by valid experts in their field. Dr Ed

On February 18, 2011, Zen Gardner wrote a very good 1/2 article, but why would he author 2006 information as current? So, as noted above with censorship, Zen got the benefit of ‘doubt’ that possibly he hadn’t seen the highly referenced current ‘Proven 9 11 Nukes’. So I wrote Zen to ‘reblog’ his article, which he approved and sent him the site address for so he could see what I posted. In essence, I put the picture I wanted for the article reposted it with my current 9 11 nuke information – not the 5 year old information when his article was printed, now 7 years old. Interesting how he got my picture, but somehow missed ‘Proven 9 11 Nukes’ and STILL repubbed 7 year old information as ‘news’.

Four days later, enter Dr James Fetzer, Zen Gardner, and Veterans Today (where I’m banned and can’t even comment on the scamming of MY articles with Fetzer and VT deleting comments on my own articles – VT ‘truth?’) with the same outdated information presented as my current information on 9 11 nukes and my articles picture being presented as Zen’s 2011 picture in “9/11″. Since my stuff (anything with my wordpress site) is heavily censored by Google (the only other source for finding my facts beside rense.com and my wordpress site), this promotion of 7 year old information will show up in Google – as my current information. It must be noted that Zen Gardner did manage to get my ‘Update:…” article posted on Before It’s News – where I’m also banned. Strange that Zen noted my article in BIN, but not in his ‘9 11’? Fetzer and Veteran’s Today ‘Editing’ without Zen Gardner’s approval?

Jim Marrs’ efforts qouting my efforts was written 6 years ago and at the time, Jim exposed ‘current’ information – Jim asked me for permission to include the article in his book, to which I stated, ‘Absolutely… Thanks’. Since Jim, made an effort to expose facts, reciprocation was in order and his facts needed to be in my article. Up until ‘9/11’ was ‘repubbed’ the same was true of Zen Gardner. It would have been no problem to simply include Marrs information without reference to Zen’s article.

The eyewitness testimony presented in Gardner’s article were not new to me as “Bombs in the WTC Proves Nothing to Racist – Fascist Bigots” http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/08/21/ward.htm , and “US Government Usage of Atomic Bombs – Domestic – WTC http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/08/21/ward.htm , had many references regarding the eyewitness testiimony. Again, there was no need to include Zen Gardeners article in my update, but it was done along the order of ‘reciprocity’ and ‘doubt’. There is no doubt anymore after ‘9/11’.

Infiltration of the Dr, PhD of logic, James Fetzer’s covert operation. After 11 years of promotion of ‘no planes’, thermite, and ‘magical’ weaponry, Fetzer suddenly ‘discovers’ ‘micro neutron nukes’ several years after http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/2010/02/dr-ed-ward-md.html ‘Proven 9 11 Nukes’ he ‘discovers’ his ‘9/11’ seven year old information and presents it as current.

I’m quite surprised by ‘9/11’ as James Fetzer, Donald Fox, Prager and myself were supposed to be writing a letter to Jones: ‘Hard Evidence Supports the Hypothesis the mini nukes were used to Demolish the WTC towers. A little problem seemed to arise when Fox was told I would not put my name as author without a ‘Proven 9 11 Nukes’ and my 7 major facts regarding the amount of and type of devastation – emails saved. If he wanted to use my information, it would not fit with the scam of ‘mystery solved’, because once one sees ‘Proven 9 11 Nukes’ the evidence is overwhelming, anyone can clearly see the mystery was solved years ago and ‘Mystery Solved is merely an expansion by a software program of already noted information. The next thing I know 2011 ‘9/11′ is on Veterans Today.

For years, Proven 9 11 Nukes’ sat at the top of Google listings for 9 11 nukes. This was a major problem for disinformation agents and organizations. Fetzer’s ‘discoveries’ have weakened that position by never mentioning ‘Proven 9 11 Nukes’ – similar to ‘no planes’ scam, where there are ‘fake video’ bypasses the fact that military planes are clearly seen flying into the WTCs.

Fetzer’s recent discovery of nukes is 4 fold. One, with Google’s assistance, Proven 9 11 nukes has been replaced with the ‘Mystery Solved’ BS. Two, Dr Judy Wood and Dr Steven Jones are being seen as the disinformation artists they are and Covert Operations needs a new ‘leader’ to push, Fetzer. Three, just as they did for 9 11 ‘scholars, etc, if the operation becomes to well known – the poison pill is taken – no planes – and the operation is broken up. 4. Actually having some real facts on something, helps Fetzer’s No Plane Disinformation.

Gordon Duff on Gordon Duff and Veterans Today: “About 30% of what’s on Veterans Today is patently false. About 40% of what I write is at least purposely partially false, because if I didn’t write false information, I wouldn’t be alive.“http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3m-ZY0R1HdQ&feature=player_embedded No information provided on why he has to delete the truth in comments on Veterans today. Or, why he chose the ‘truth’ as a ‘career’, when he knows, according to him, that he can NOT tell the truth.

In covert ops, ANYTHING that hinders, disrupts, halts or confuses the dispersal of factual information is GOOD.

The Old Style Nuclear Fission Bombs Calculator – A small DOS program Nuclear.exe. Available here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/files/ Just download Nuclear.exe. Type 1 at the prompt, then type in the size of the nuke in kilotons. Example a 150 kiloton would be typed in the prompt as 150. A 2 MEGATON would be 2000. Enter 1 again for more information on the same size nuke. Repeat for any size you want. The bombs in the WTC were most likely around 0.018 kilotons, so you would enter .018 at the prompt.

As I revisited this whole nuke thing after all these years and was mulling over the photos of all those singed and bent vehicles, my friend Connie Smith — a long-time 9/11 researcher some of you may know — dropped me a note reminding me of something I’d completely forgotten about: the fascinating case of EMT Patricia Ondrovic.

Connie reminded me of an interview with Ondrovic, published back in October 2001 (and which I’d read circa ‘04). When I expressed an interest to reread it, she dug up a copy and sent it to me (see attached). Ms Ondrovic’s account is truly ‘bizarre’, and a testament to the fact that there were forces at play on 9/11 that modern technology — indeed, mainstream science — simply cannot explain. Please read the attached PDF doc carefully. It’s one a helluva wake-up call.

As this terrified woman was running pell-mell away from the first collapsing tower — her hair, coat and feet on fire — Ms Ondrovic witnessed vehicles parked along the street spontaneously erupt into flames. She even witnessed an aircraft disappear while in flight: “I saw something in the sky, it was a plane, but it was way out. It looked like it was over Jersey or something, then it wasn’t there anymore. I saw a small fireball, and it was gone. I saw two other planes. One came in one way, and the other came in the other way, and there was a plane in the middle that was way far off in the distance. Then the plane in the middle just disappeared into a little fire ball. It looked like the size of a golf ball from where I could see it. And the other two planes veered off into opposite directions. I just kept on running north.” And she’s got a lot more to say.

Then there’s this other chap Connie knows (“a famous author”) who’d interviewed another woman who had witnessed “people engulfed in some sort of fireball and disintegrating.” Connie just dug up the following note from this person to her, and is checking to see if I may get in touch with him directly.

“I interviewed a Red Cross worker in Dallas whose name escapes me at the moment but I have her report in my files. She told me she was sent to NYC by the Red Cross to help survivors of the WTC. She said the thing that most stuck out in her mind after interviewing dozens of people was the number that told her of looking back and seeing people engulfed in some sort of fireball and disintegrating.

Obviously, a collapsing building cannot produce such an effect. But a mini-nuke shaped charge placed in the basement to blow out the central core columns could. A small nuclear device could also explain the pyroplasmic cloud seen above the WTC, the disintegration and warping of heavy steel beams and the pulverization of so much concrete, not to mention the blood cell cancer now suffered by some of the first responders.”

Folks, this obviously isn’t Nanothermite at work here. I can’t even begin to guess what it could be. DEWs, or some similar ‘exotic’ technology, may not be that farfetched after all? As my old Alaskan buddy from Arkansas would’ve exclaimed, “Wayl, ahd be go to hayl!”

(Full quotation by kind permission of Jim Marrs, from his upcoming updated book on 9/11)

By Jim Marrs [Shirley Hoofard: Author’s interview February, 2005]

Felipe David working for Aramark Corp. tending vending machines in a basement of the North Tower recalled, “That day I was in the basement in sub-level 1 sometime after 8:30am. Everything happened so fast, everything moved so fast. The building started shaking after I heard the explosion below; dust was flying everywhere and all of a sudden it got real hot. I threw myself onto the floor, covered my face because I felt like I was burned. I sat there for a couple of seconds on the floor and felt like I was going to die, saying to myself ‘God, please give me strength.’ When I went in, I told them it was an explosion,” David, with his skin hanging in tatters may have been the person helped to safety by William Rodriguez.

Skin dripping off the body was mentioned by several 9/11 victims. Gamma ray radiation can cause a person to just feel heat, then pain and then the skin will be damaged. The skin may be vaporized, charred or left hanging.

Shirley Hoofard was a 38-year-old Red Cross worker in the Dallas area on 9/11. Hoofard was ordered to New York to begin working with victims and their families. She also was ordered not to reveal any information to the media or the public.

“It was very difficult to deal with,” she recalled. “The only way I got through it was to shut down. I didn’t think or feel. I just did what I did. By the middle of January [2002] I said ‘I have to go home.’”

But she could not get out of her mind what some of the victims told her. “Several victims told me they saw people engulfed in a fireball and disintegrating. One man said he was at work when he heard a loud noise and at the far end of the cubicles he saw a man running toward him with a fireball coming after him. The running man just exploded, flying into pieces…I heard stories like that from people from both towers….I don’t know the physics but at what temperature does a human vaporize?”

6. 16 inch steel Spires that withstood 1/2 a Billion pounds of building falling on them and suddenly turn into limp noodles and partially vaporize. Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm Also: The Collapse of the Spire http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W0-W582fNQ

“He looked absolutely terrified, he was shaking, he was pale, he was sweating. I looked at him, I said what’s wrong? He said there’s another plane headed our way, and they just blew up the Pentagon. I said, another plane? What are you talking about? I hadn’t realized that planes had hit this, I thought they just set bombs off. I didn’t realize when I got there that planes hit it. I said, what do you mean another plane? He said two planes hit the World Trade Center.” According to this – a fourth plane was on the way for WTC 7?

My partner and I grabbed our stretcher, went to put it in the back of our vehicle, and at that time, I think it was the lobby of the building behind us blew out.

Everybody started running, I didn’t see him again that day. He got thrown one way, I got thrown the other way.

I started running towards the West Side Highway, and there was another building on the corner, I guess it was a federal building, cause it was all the green and gray uniforms with the Smokey the Bear hats, the cops in there. I went to run in the lobby cause all of a sudden you couldn’t see anything.

There was smoke, there was debris, there was everything flying around. I ran into the lobby cause I had no idea what had happened and the cops that were in there were telling everybody get out, get out, get out. Where are you gonna go? Stuffs blowing up. So I ran back out…

Dr. Ed Ward MD, AS, BS, MD – Reporting and investigating Constitutional abuses of the US government for almost 2 decades. AS, BS in Medical Technology – Minor in Organic Chemistry and Physics, volunteer during the Viet Nam war 6 years stateside active duty ‘med tech’ ‘US Air Farce’ – a decade experience in Medical Technology. MD degree from LSU, New Orleans – 2 decades in the field of General Practice. (My) Articles are also referenced by valid experts in their field. Dr Ed

But, in the above pictured fireball, that according to NIST was hot enough to weaken steel, miraculous thermite didn’t burn at 430 C, nor even at the temperatures of the fireball.

According to Jones and and his disinformation cronies, thermite waited an hour to suddenly react explosively, and even then, not all of the coatings of the steel beams burned. Some of coating ‘decided’ not to burn despite being surrounded by burning thermite? It melts through massive steel girders, but has no effect on the thermite coating that will burn at 430 C?

And what of the supposed thermite coatings on the steel that survived the nuke? Did the thermite coating burn off without effecting the steel, indeed there are tons of steel devoid of any paint or coating – classic nuclear residue for steel – how does thermite burn off without effecting the steel?

And what about, tons of concrete, file cabinets, phones, computers, over 1,000 people where not even a single strand of DNA was found, anaerobic fire, etc., et al, and yet paper didn’t burn. Apparently, all but the paper was coated in invisible, super duper thermite too? http://www.rense.com/general86/therm.htm

Even the best nanothermite’s, a proven deflagraton mixture http://rense.com/general77/geddno.htm, erroneously inflated calculations require a pound of thermite to melt 1.3 to 2 pounds of steel depending upon the quality of the steel and ASSUMING 100% of the total energy produced is absorbed by the steel – NO HEAT LOSS to its surroundings other than the steel itself.

This inane assumption markedly increases the ‘calculated’ amount of melted steel that will be produced. As anyone can see when thermite ignites it gives off a MASSIVE amount of heat to its surrounding environment. (Note: These calculations are from Jones’ 2007 9 11 studies site, not me. Also, note that thermite only BURNS and doesn’t explode just like all deflagration mixtures – the NEED for thermite to evolve into magical exploding thermite hasn’t happened, yet. http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/JLobdillThermiteChemistryWTC

Real Experiment with Real Results: Weigh a piece of steel. Put a gram of thermite on it and ignite it. When the thermite finishes burning, pour off the steel, remove and ‘slag’, weigh the steel and subtract from the original weight. But, if one did that, they couldn’t inflate the amount of melting steel produced by ‘calculations’ which ASSUME every calorie of heat (100%) produced goes directly to the steel.

LINEAR THERMITE CUTTING CHARGES: This is Jones’ pick for and example of what took down the towers? And in reality, it is almost state of the art (the ones used to cut scrap, are about 6 foot long and burn for several minutes), since no building has ever been demolished using thermite and no company has used thermite to ever demolish a building then, or now. Although what Jones’ shows is a toy compared to working thermite torches.

This is what is needed (or similar), used and for all demolitions since 1995 when they were first made, or similar. These, you just wrap around what you want to cut – tremendously less set up time and fewer people needed. But even those explosive cutters wont touch the core columns http://www.securitysystems-tech.com/articles/sabrex-cuts-through-competition It’s either this or several million of Jones’ – Linear Thermite Cutting Charges. See if you can find some ‘thermite’ flexible, linear, contact cutting charges.

“Physical mixing presents some limitations, such as not homogeneous distribution of oxidizer and fuel,…

“In sol-gel, the random distribution of the particles and the inherent organic impurities result in limited performance.”

This approach has several advantages over previous investigations, such as lower ignition temperature, enhanced interfacial contact area, reduced impurities and Al oxidation, tailored dimensions, and easier integration into a microsystem to realize functional devices.

One current promising nanocomposite being pursued by the researchers at LLNL involves the use of Fe2O3 which is generated using the sol-gel method. The reason that Fe2O3 is chosen is because its thermite reaction with UFG aluminum is very exothermic (with only CuO and MoO3 yielding greater energy of reaction). An example of the high degree of mixing and uniformity between two nanophases is found in Figure 7, which indicates the excellent dispersion of Al and Fe on the nanoscale domain. http://infohouse.p2ric.org/ref/34/33115.pdf 2002

The above statements clearly show that purity, uniformity and equal dispersal of all reactants is vital for adequate performance. Remember, PURITY – has ONLY the necessary elements needed to complete a thermite reaction – no extra elements – no impurities, Uniformity – one section of thermitic material should have almost exactly the same ratio of elements as any other section of thermitic material. It’s important when we start to see all the impurities and ‘areas of concentration’ in these so called – pure, uniform active thermite chips.

Dr. Steven E Jones, PhD – Fraud

“Here we go into this catastrophe of research (Purity and Uniformity Rule): Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9 11 World Trade Center Catastrophe.”

First, let’s thin the herd – It’s ok, Jones already knows: “The (actually more silver colored in non oxidized portions) grey portion of the ‘active thermite’ portion does nothing to contribute to a thermitic reacton. “…a gray layer in which mainly iron and oxygen are found.” The gray layer was found to consist mostly of iron oxide so that it probably does not contribute to the exotherm,…” 1. There was nothing in the grey layer for Fe Oxide (R/O – Fe3O4 – grey, silver color and more O than Fe – fits nicely http://www.minelco.com/en/Minerals/Iron-Oxide/ (obvious for anyone that uses spectroscopy daily), Fe2O3 is red = Rust) to react with. 2. Nanothermite must be a homogenous layer of reactants, not a slab of stuff here and a slab of stuff there.

The grey layer is not thermite and I can see no way it interacts in any significant way with the red layer. So, just forget about it for now. The picture is confusing enough with just the ‘possible’ red layer of ‘thermite’.

The red/grey chip: “the concentration of the particles was found to vary locally,” – Now, the red chip has problems too. Nanothermite concentraton levels need to be consistent throughout for optimal performance. Not enough to prove a scam yet, but getting close.

For those not familiar with Xeds = Xray Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy. Excited electrons release energy at a specific wavelength depending on its atoms characteristics, before and after bonding with another atom. The machine measures the wavelength and plots it.

Now for reading. Each atom, molecule, compound or molecular crystal has its own wavelength and if everything works right it will always be at it’s ‘count’ or wavelength ‘spot’. The height of the line at the spot tells you what the concentration is provided one is interested in doing ‘calculations’. It’s not needed for what is required. The height of the lines are ‘proportional’. So, you don’t get concentrations, you get a ‘ratio’. One line is twice the height of another, then there is twice as much of the taller than the shorter. If an element is counted more than once – a different form of that element is present, like Fe, Fe3O4 and Fe2O3, each will be in it’s count spot.

“The four spectra in Fig. (6) indicate that the gray layers are consistently characterized by high iron and oxygen content including a smaller amount of carbon.” Actually, as you read on you will find this is not correct. There are more molecules, some are on the chart and not being counted (can be hidden very easily by making ‘background’ adjustments on the instrument) – look at the 5.9 count spot – Jones does post the real results later but not until he’s scammed them as having JUST the needed ‘active thermite ingredients’.

“The chemical signatures found in the red layers are also quite consistent (Fig. 7), each showing the presence of aluminum (Al), silicon (Si), iron (Fe) and oxygen (O), and a significant carbon (C) peak as well.” Again, this is not correct. All the specimens also have Na, K, S, and Ca. They are very small quantities or this machine, like older Xeds without an improved spectroscopy window, isn’t doing well on the lighter elements.

But, most can be seen, just look at their count spot and you’ll see them. Spoiler – there’s a LOT more, that’s not getting told yet. At this point, I’m done with this scam of ‘active thermite’, enough for me to know, but I want you to know. No homogenous mixture, and impurities are rampant – Jones does post the real results later but not until he’s scammed them as having JUST the needed ‘active thermite ingredients’.

“To confirm and to quantify these observations, XEDS spectra (subsequent plots) were acquired from specific regions of high Si, Al and Fe concentrations.” Now we see another impurity previously hidden that also showed up in the ‘unwashed’ sample, and this sampling, yet somehow – instrument adjustments – don’t show up previously. Mg shows up in the 1.3 count spot in the unwashed sampling – not noted – but is finally called here. Its also in the 1.3 count spot of the silicon sampling and not noted.

“The existence of elemental aluminum and iron oxide leads to the obvious hypothesis that the material may contain thermite.” A google of – aluminum iron oxide paint – produces a similar list of ‘active thermites’.

“Red/gray chips were subjected to heating using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). The data shown in Fig. (19) demonstrate that the red/gray chips from different WTC samples all ignited in the range 415-435 °C.” This will be dealt with in the ‘blow torch’ ignition later in the article.

We already know this general term ‘iron oxide’ is specifically Fe3O4. Why not call it specifically? This happens ‘according to jones’ every time, so where is any evidence? Like a picture of the sample igniting at 415 degrees? We will see why when we get to the blow torch. “The gray layer was found to consist mostly of iron oxide so that it probably does not contribute to the exotherm,”

“Fig. (18). XEDS spectrum obtained from a probe of the region of high iron concentration on the MEK-soaked red chip,” Here more impurities – hidden prior – start showing up. The impurities NA, S and P are finally shown. If they are in this small section sampling – they must also be in the total scamming, er scanning results – but somehow didn’t show? Well some showed, they were just ignored – as clearly shown.

“Fig. (19). Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC) traces for four red/gray chip samples found in World Trade Center dust collections.” There is no doubt something burned in the DSC. There is also no doubt that the amount or what burned is NOT the equal. 1. They ignite at different heats. They release different amounts of energy. If they were all the same, they would all burn at exactly the same termperature and give exactlly the same amouint of heart. For me, something like MEK is responsible. It burns at 404 when it is the only sampling. Varying amounts of residual MEK or hydrocarbon would produce these results. Now, supposedly, these were not the chips soaked in MEK. But, one thing we know is if this was truly ‘nano thermite’ it would be pure and it would all burn exactly at the same temperature and always give the same amount of heat.

“Fig. (20). Photomicrographs of residues from red/gray chips ignited in the DSC. Notice the shiny-metallic spheres and also the translucent spheres.” Ooops, active thermite that burns at 3,000 to 4,000 C ignites at 400, but doesn’t ignite the rest of the ‘active thermite’ and how does the rest of the ‘active thermite’ not burn at 400 or even 3,000 degrees that would happen if this was truly ‘active thermite’. How does that happen. Impossible by everything we know about regular themate, let alone super duper miraculous nano thermite. Thermate is notorious for being EXTREMELY hard to put out once it starts burning.

“Fig. (21). Spheroid found in post-DSC residue showing iron-rich sphere and the corresponding XEDS spectrum.” Here anothing unseen impurity shows up, Ca. Yes, it doesn’t show up in the spectrum anywhere else, but the unwashed samplling, but to be in the residual, IT MUST BE IN THE ORIGNIAL, unless Jones’ is going to start claiming ‘active thermite’ is also a nuclear reaction.

“5. Flame/Ignition Tests The DSC used in our studies does not allow for visual inspection of the energetic reaction. Therefore tests were also performed with a small oxyacetylene flame applied to red/gray chips.” What he is supposedly try to prove could easily be done on a lab “hot plate’ and a piece of steel. Simply place non flame heater at 410, let the plate and steel equalize, set the ‘active thermite’ on the steel and turn the heater up to 420 and start recording. But instead, Jones pulls out an oxyacetylene torch which burns from 3,000 to 5,000 degrees http://www.welderssupplyco.com/showpage.php?pid=49 . This would also be consistent with the white – blue flame which indicates a similar temperature. Even at this temperature, it takes a while to get the ‘active thermite’ to get a tiny flame that does not engulf the entire sample. Just like in the DSC, only a very small portion of the sample burns.

Even Jones knows this is not ‘exploding nor even burning thermite’. This small flake is what Jones states destroyed inches of steel. Yet, he’s going to test it with his fingers. I’d like to see a comparison burn done with just regular burning ‘nano thermite’. This would be equivalent to a ‘scientist’ dipping his finger in nitroglycerine, then tapping it on the table to see if its nitroglycerine. He’s not crazy, just a covert op government scumbag that has been used in the past to destroy ‘cold fusion’ by saying the reaction was based on muon energy. Pons and Fleischman both noted the energy is NOT muon based. But pumped by government media, Jones’ muon scam was enough to hide the massive ‘cold fusion’ potential, which is also the trigger and reactants of the ‘pure fusion neutron bomb.. Next, he introduces the poison pill super duper exploding thermite for the WTCs derstruction. Currently, he’s being used to hide pure fusion bombs as ‘super duper secret nano thermite bombs’ also, subtely being promoted by military sources. Note: Proves what he is testing does not explode.

“Fig. (23). Silvery-gray spheroids (left) are seen after the ignition test of red/gray chip from sample 1; some of the porous red material remains; both can be seen in the corresponding SEM image (right).” Again, proof we are not dealing with ‘active thermite’ since if it’s ‘active thermite’ once ignited its ALL going to burn. Jones proves whatever he has does NOT explode.

“We observe that the spheroidal residues from ignition of red chips (Figs. 25, 26) possess a strikingly similar chemical signature to a typical XEDS spectrum from a spheroid generated by commercial thermite (Fig. 24). This similarity supports our hypothesis that the red chips are indeed a form of thermite.” Here Jones supposed proves a form of thermite, but disproves ‘active nano thermite’ which is tremendously more pure than regular commercial thermite – multiple unoted elevated count spots. Known by Jones, but hidden, heres the quote without the extra BS – Ordinary thermite…and gives a significantly broader trace than super-thermite [21] – cited link doesn’t work and not needed since Jones himself shows the truth – nano thermite DOES NOT have these impurities.

“XEDS spectrum from a sphere found in the WTC dust.” Adds a new impurites with Ti, and C along with repeat impurites of Ca, K, S, Mg – again if they are in the residue, they must be in the original – just not being shown. Even in this XEDS count note the unlabeled count spots at 3.9.

“We have noted that ordinary thermite acts as an incendiary when ignited. However, when the ingredients are ultrafine-grain and are intimately mixed, the mixture reacts very rapidly, even explosively [20]. Using this refernce for explosives is FALSE. http://infohouse.p2ric.org/ref/34/33115.pdf This article clearly shows ‘nanothermite’ being used as an ‘initiator’, synonym ‘igniter’, used in a ‘contained’ environment, much like regular thermites use in pyrotechnics. It is not an explosive, makes no gas in its reaction so it can not add anything to propulsion or explosive effects while confined. It can however rapidly heat a deflagration chemical – like thermite or nanothermite – that will explode under confinement.

“We make no attempt to specify the particular form of nano-thermite present until more is learned about the red material and especially about the nature of the organic material it contains.” Hasn’t been done yet, the same as the rest of the follow up. It’s not going to happen, can’t be done. Specifics will show the scam, and will NOT be done.”

“A graph in an article on nanostructured energetic materials [21] shows that the energy/volume yield for Al/Fe2O3 composite material exceeds that of TNT, HMX and TATB explosives commonly used in demolitions (see Fig. (30)).” Another attempt to link nano thermite to explosives. There is no doubt that current nano technology produces massive gasless energy per unit of volume. But, that energy is deflaglatory energy, not explosive. Nanothermite is to regular explosives as lithium 7 is to nukes.

“We have observed that some chips have additional elements such as potassium – K – already noted, lead – Pb, barium – Ba – new and copper – Cu – new.” More impurities show up – all the unlabeled count spots finally making a small appearance.

What Is Wrong With the US government and all its accessories before and after the fact? Nothing that Work Strikes, Boycotts, Trials*, Accountability, and a quick dance at the end of a rope won’t fix. * Constitutional Trials: Based on all ‘laws’ and ‘rights’ granted or denied by the Original Intent Interpretation of the Constitution and in particular the Bill of Rights – The only interpretation allowed by the Constitution.

Dr. Ed Ward MD, AS, BS, MD – Reporting and investigating Constitutional abuses of the US government for almost 2 decades. AS, BS in Medical Technology – Minor in Organic Chemistry and Physics, volunteer during the Viet Nam war 6 years stateside active duty ‘med tech’ ‘US Air Farce’ – a decade experience in Medical Technology. MD degree from LSU, New Orleans – 2 decades in the field of General Practice. (My) Articles are also referenced by valid experts in their field.

About: Ed Ward, MD’s Blog of Referenced Facts, and Me, Dr Ed Ward, MD Congratulations! If you’ve made it here, you’ve made it through a MASSIVE Maze of government propaganda, censorship, and Psyops. To the Best of my Knowledge and Evaluation, You will only find the referenced, pertinent facts for the ID and Remedy of Our governments fascism, as well as world wide government fascism here… Continues https://edwardmd.wordpress.com/about/ Dr Ed

US Government Problem: Video of the planes needed to actually fly into the WTCs are readily available to the public.

WTC E10A MC2A Clone Note Appendage

US Government Solution: Promote the Videos as ‘fake’ based on ‘pixel’ BS – This solves the ‘evidence’ problem while never noting that the planes are NOT commercial airliners – which are not structurally capable of performing the tasks and look nothing like the photographic proof that commercial airliners are ‘not in the picture’ and US Government Military Planes are ‘in the picture’. Actually, an excellent scam premise when pumped out by the covert op truth troops.

WTC Military No Window Plane Sweptback Wingtips

Wingtips say B 767-400ERE-10A is THE CLONE USED to fly into the WTCs – Unless someone has a version that matches the video better.

The videos show that a Boeing 767-400ER E-10A was the supposed Super-Powered’ Commercial Airliner’. (One of these all very similar clones is clearly seen – one version of these clones has the ‘swept’ back wingtips used to discredit the video as fakery by some… Boeing 767-400ER E-10A) All early videos show the pod and the swept back wing – Recently, I’ve seen newer posts of truth videos in which the planes have neither.

Something that is fake can prove nothing, except that it is fake. It can not prove whether, how, or even if an actual event happened or not. Of course for this premise of ‘fake’ video proving anything one must also believe that during planning…

Someone says, since the plan is to use hijacked airliners, “Hey, let’s not use real planes. Let’s truck the plane parts in, crews to lay them out, people to say they saw planes, etc, et al, and just make some fake videos of planes going into the towers. Now, when we make these fake videos, instead of photoshopping in a commercial airliner with windows, we’ll photoshop in the plane needed to actually do it. Everybody high fives and says, ‘yeah, it’s just our lives on the line for treason.’ ”

Next day, the moron is no longer a threat… most likely scenario, taken out by their own family out of fear they’d all be taken out. It’s ludicrous on multiple levels.. Not just one.

The Ivy Flats Video, the testing of the first micro nuke, the Davy Crockett, is a perfect example of a camera that simply is too slow. Sure, cameras are a lot faster now, so have the travel speeds. They capture erratic images AT BEST when velocity exceeds capture speed images/PIXELS distort. Fact as clearly seen on the Ivy Flats video as soldiers move off train watch what happens to their legs. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nv_q8q6Z9_I

Fake video is only important if one NEEDS to disprove video evidence that a SUPER POWERED IRREGULAR SHAPED, NON WINDOWED ‘COMMERCIAL AIRLINER’ FLEW INTO THE WTCS – INDIRECTLY, without drawing attention to the fact a military aircraft flew into the WTCs. It’s still being done today by so called ‘truthers’. Did the ‘truther orgs’ say? The US government has been caught using its own planes to destroy the WTCs? No everything was silent and then came the need for the ‘fake video’ call.

There are additional photos in original article ‘9 11 Fake Video Stars: The JSTAR Clones. Why Covert Ops Must Have Fake Video 9-11 Fake Video Stars – The JSTAR Clones 10-1-10 Note, the little blue decal up front – one of the WTC witnesses claims to have seen one on the ‘plane that flew into..) BTW, eye witness testimony – the LEAST valuable information WITHOUT additional evidence. http://www.rense.com/general92/911fk.htm

The wall was 12 ft thick, THE PLANE WAS NOT FILLED WITH WATER, but the tanks were to simulate fuel.

“But there was a test similar to what is described above. In 1988, an unmanned F-4 Phantom, ballasted with water and mounted on rails, was”flown” into a concrete wall at 480 MPH. As reported, the plane crumpled, and penetrated only about 2 inches of concrete. A very impressive test – except it wasn’t meant to be a test of nuclear reactor safety. The wall the F-4 crashed into was not a simulation of a nuclear plant’s wall. It was a 12-foot-thick wall mounted on an air cushion. The test was designed to study impact forces by measuring how far the impact would push the wall. Breaking through the concrete was the last thing any of the involved scientists wanted to achieve. Furthermore, the F-4 was ballasted with water to give it the same weight as a plane fully loaded with fuel, and its final weight was 42,000 pounds. Needless to say, crashing a 412,000 pound 767 loaded with fuel into a fixed wall would have slightly different results.

Because according to a 1982 study by the Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois – a study which was conducted by request of the DOE and the NRC – the explosion from a 707 crashing into a containment dome at 466 MPH would probably overwhelm the reactor’s shielding. Note – that’s a 707, which weighs 336,000 pounds. In 1982 those were big jets. But we’ve “advanced” considerably since then. The 767s that were flown into the World Trade Center weighed 80,000 pounds more than that and carried a lot more fuel.

Sandia notes:
The purpose of the test was to determine the impact force, versus time, due to the impact, of a complete F-4 Phantom — including both engines — onto a massive, essentially rigid reinforced concrete target (3.66 meters thick). Previous tests used F-4 engines at similar speeds. The test was not intended to demonstrate the performance (survivability) of any particular type of concrete structure to aircraft impact. The impact occurred at the nominal velocity of 215 meters per second (about 480 mph). The mass of the jet fuel was simulated by water; the effects of fire following such a collision was not a part of the test. The test established that the major impact force was from the engines. The test was performed by Sandia National Laboratories under terms of a contract with the Muto Institute of Structural Mechanics, Inc., of Tokyo.

With very minimal damage to the concrete target block, the plane and its engines were easily converted into small chunks of metal confetti and shrapnel at the physical interface of the two impact objects. Upon initial impact, the follow-on rear portions of the plane yet to make contact retained their shape integrity until their respective impact. (This seriously contradicts claims by Jean-Pierre Desmoulins that the wings of a 757 would have folded forward, as well as claims in the popular press that the wings folded back before entering the “too-small” hole.) The resulting shear caused debris being spread out to the left, right, and rear of the impact locus, having no ability to proceed in their original vector path, having grossly failed the test of strength with the concrete block. However, the wings are wider than the concrete block, so the wingtips are sheared off whole, and they tumble forward after being cleanly separated from the aircraft.

F4 aircraft impacting a solid concrete barrier. Note that the wings and tail do not fold as the nose impacts the concrete. (source: don’t bother moved -http://www.sandia.gov/media/NRgallery00-03.htm)

Sugano (in itself) doesn’t show that a 757 hitting the Pentagon would be turned into confetti and small chunks, but it does show that an F4 was completely destroyed in arguably similar circumstances. Furthermore, it wasn’t anywhere close to an even contest between the wall and the F4. The F4 started with a speed of 215 m/sec — and the tail was still traveling at 185 m/sec when it smashed into the wall. The F4 is a very strongly build aircraft, although at 18 meters long and 19 kg, it’s about a third the length and a fifth the weight of the 757. In terms of comparing what would happen to a 757 versus what happened to the F4, it would be difficult to do an accurate calculation without detailed design information on both aircraft. In a preliminary analysis, the extra length of the 757 means that it has three times the distance to decelerate — but the 757 is also much heavier, so it’s more difficult for the crushing process to supply enough force to decelerate even as rapidly as the F4 did.” http://www.911-strike.com/missing-confetti.htm The article from the ‘pentagon disinformation unit’ counters the information from the ‘WTC no planes disinformation unit’.

Dr. Ed Ward MD, AS, BS, MD – Reporting and investigating Constitutional abuses of the US government for almost 2 decades. AS, BS in Medical Technology – Minor in Organic Chemistry and Physics, volunteer during the Viet Nam war 6 years stateside active duty ‘med tech’ ‘US Air Farce’ – a decade experience in Medical Technology. MD degree from LSU, New Orleans – 2 decades in the field of General Practice. (My) Articles are also referenced by valid experts in their field.

2. Trace definition as it applies to quantity:
Occurring in extremely small amounts or in quantities less than a standard limit (In the case of tritium, this standard level would be 20 TUs – the high of quoted standard background levels.). http://www.thefreedictionary.com/trace

However, groundwater studies show a significanlty less water concentration:
Groundwater age estimation using tritium only provides semi-quantitative, “ball park” values:
• <0.8 TU indicates submodern water (prior to 1950s)
• 0.8 to 4 TU indicates a mix of submodern and modern water
• 5 to 15 TU indicates modern water (<5 to 10 years)
• 15 to 30 TU indicates some bomb tritium http://www.grac.org/agedatinggroundwater.pdf

But, instead of “5 to 15 TU” (which would make the increase in background levels even higher), I will use 20 TUs as the 2001 environmental level to give all possible credibility to the lie of “Traces”.

6. Let’s calculate the proven referenced facts.

Tritium level confirmed in the DOE report of traces of tritium = 3,530 pCi/L (+/- 170 pCi/L, but we will use the mean of 3,530 pCi/L).

8. Thomas M. Semkowa, Ronald S. Hafnerc, Pravin P. Parekha, Gordon J. Wozniakd, Douglas K. Hainesa, Liaquat Husaina, Robert L. Rabune. Philip G. Williams and Steven Jones have all called over 1,000 TUs of Tritium, “Traces”. Even at the height of nuclear bomb testing – after thousands of Megatons of nuclear testing – 98% of the rainwater tests were 2,000 TUs or less. https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241096.pdf (While indeed, the original title of the named authors was ‘Tritium levels Elevated’ they, unlike Jones who just lied about the title, use the same MAJOR flaw of neglecting the volume of the total sample – although one can clearly justify their decision to let the flaw stay with the routine imprisonment of government whistle blowers (Free Bradley Manning).

9. Over one year ago, Steven Jones, Alex Jones, Fetzer, Wood, most of the “BYU crew”, most of the so called “911 Truth” groups/sites and indeed the public at large have been notified by me of the falseness of the “Traces” lie, but instead of promoting the truth and addressing it, have simply run from it and seem to be doing all in their power to suppress it. http://www.rense.com/general80/prov.htm

As for Jones “Hard Evidence Repudiates…”. The only thing Jones addresses in MY massive amount of evidence is ‘tritium’ AND JONES IS A PROVEN LIAR ABOUT IT. In 7 years can anyone show where Jones, Dr Judy Wood, or any of the supposed ‘9 11 truth groups’ – pilots, architects, etc, et al., covert op, cointel – has addressed proven text book nuclear bomb residue evidence in total, the onlg weapon known to exist that can causee all of the WTC ‘anomalies’ on the scale needed. 3 billion pounds of building turned into 2 billion pounds of instant dust, wilting 16 inch thick spires, 8 inch thick I beam horseshoes, ‘hiroshima effect’ spectrum of cancers, 3 massive craters, 5 acres of land at 1800 degrees, no DNA found for more than 1k people, impossible fires, anaerobic combustion, etc, et al.

Jones posted ‘hard evidence’ 3 days after ‘Us Government Usage of Atomic Bombs WTC’ http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm which was getting massive net exposure – 1 million hits in first opening month most of which came in the first few days thanks to Jeff Rense. This was MAJOR factual data for exposing the truth. Enter Jones ‘hard evidence repudiates’ which denies nukes based on a lie about tritium, bypasses all my other evidence and deals with ‘other’ inferior evidence. This was pushed heavily by ‘9 11 truth’ covert ops (Much like Dr Judy Wood’s DEW BS is being pushed, which now apparently includes time travel in her list of ludicrous ‘maybes’, what ifs, etc, most of which are secret with no verification that they exist and certainly no verification they exist on a scale needed to destroy the WTCs and under the known environmental conditions that occurred during the WTC demoliton. One doesn’t have to wonder about the outcome of her famous ‘court case’ which names NO WEAPON only a list of never ending possibilities http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:r8-t3n54GkoJ:www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/fraud/911_attack/news.php%3Fq%3D1270671298+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us) , and still is – every year or so zombie hard evidence, proven lie about tritium – surfaces as ‘new evidence’, again bypassing MASSIVE proven evidence.

Dr. Ed Ward MD, AS, BS, MD – Reporting and investigating Constitutional abuses of the US government for almost 2 decades. AS, BS in Medical Technology – Minor in Organic Chemistry and Physics, volunteer during the Viet Nam war 6 years stateside active duty ‘med tech’ ‘US Air Farce’ – a decade experience in Medical Technology. MD degree from LSU, New Orleans – 2 decades in the field of General Practice. (My) Articles are also referenced by valid experts in their field.

Prior to peer review by Donald Fox, I have noted that WTC 7 was not nuked since there was no pyroclastic cloud nor residual heat. http://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/01/20/dr-judy-wood-911-gatekeeper-extraordinaire/ “I believe there are problems with a nuke in WTC 7. 1. The residual heat signature only lasted a couple of days, which would be more consistent with nuke debris spread from WTC 1. 2. I looked at film of WTC 7, and didn’t see a pyroclastic flow.”

I responded with: “Best video I’ve seen of 7 and indeed there is pyroclastic flow, there is still the problem of residual heat. Perhaps like WTC 6 where there is documented proof of tampering with the heat signatures – 1 site showed residual heat at 6 while another site using the same data showed NO residual heat – See Update: The US Government’s Usage of Atomic Bombs – Domestic – WTChttp://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm
Based on your cited video, it appears that there was indeed a neutron nuke in 7 too. That would make 1, 2, 6, and 7 – All nuked. Thanks for the link.”

So, I went back and examined the thermal images – no evidence of tampering was noted (nothing like the crude blackening of WTC 6). Indeed, there is minimal heat right after 7 was demolished and it still looks more like WTC 2 residue. But, very shortly after that, 3 large heat zones appear – linear, even spaced – 1 dead center and one on each side. It just took a while for the heat to transfer up. This would correlate with 3 surface to slightly sub-surface micro nukes in WTC 7. Set to explode just after/during the regular demolition would account for the more lateral flow of the pyroclastic flow.

To date: 4 WTC buildings nuked using 10 micro neutron nukes total- most likely scenario.
.
WTCs 1 and 2 – 1 in the basement – shook people out of the building, 1 at ground level – last to go off, and 1 about the 60th floor give or take a few. 3 for each building.

B. 95% of rainwater measurements taken after thousands of megatons of nuclear testing were exploded were equal to or less than the 1,092 TU/L.

Enter Dr. Judy Wood’s Bogus Science comparing 1,092 TU/L as the total amount of Tritium present at the WTC vs a single liter of precipitation during nuclear testing (ignoring the total volume of the precipitation), Cold Fusion and Nuclear reactors, so it couldn’t have been Neutron Nukes. I will clearly show this as the scam Bogus Science it is. Comparing apples to oranges, neglecting total volumes when it assists disinfo, misrepresenting the basic physics of the examples, and total disregard of the ability to the split second timing needed to bring the towers down within the few seconds in which they fell. http://i45.tinypic.com/2e0nvbt.jpg – link to Wood’s new assertions in her myriad of unproven, ludicrous and magical DEWs of what destroyed the towers without ever actually stating what did destroy the towers. The only thing Wood’s knows despite 100% classic textbook evidence of Neutron Nukes is that it wasn’t nukes.

1. The amount of residual Tritium left after a nuclear detonation is extremly small compared to the amount created. “For example, high-altitude thermonuclear explosions in tropical regions will introduce tritium directly into the stratosphere where mixing processes are very slow (Bibron, 1965; Jacobs, 1968; Libby, 1958). By comparison, low-altitude detonations in tropical regions result in the entrainment of a substantial fraction of the water vapour in the environmental atmosphere by the ascending air current that is created by the explosion.”

2. Cold fusion, which could not even be consistently reproduced until AFTER 9-11-2001, is designed to contain the ever increasing Tritium produced within the system thereby concentrating it and uses extremely small volumes of of heavy water some cells may not even have a liter of heavy water in the cells. So while the concentrations of tritium in the heavy water can be high in a cell the total volume is very small. (Very Basic Example: What has more sugar in it? An 8 ounce drink with 5 spoons of sugar in it? Or a 40 ounce drink with a spoon of sugar for every 8 ounces? One is 5 times more concentrated than the other, but the total amount of sugar is the same. Concentration without total volume is USELESS.)

In order to measure the tritium if any produced due to cold fusion reactions the deuterated Pd samples were kept in contact with distilled water for a few hours to extract the tritium by isotopic exchange into the water. http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/KrishnanMSevidencefo.pdf

The facts of Cold Fusion develepment:

Fleischmann left for England in 1995, and the contract with Pons was not renewed in 1998 after spending $40 million with no tangible results.[67] The IMRA laboratory was closed in 1998 after spending £12 million on cold fusion work..[3]

The Boston Globe estimated in 2004 that there were only 100 to 200 researchers working in the field, most suffering damage to their reputation and career.[70]

May 2008 Japanese researcher Yoshiaki Arata (Osaka University) demonstrated an experiment that produced heat when deuterium gas was introduced into a cell containing a mixture of palladium and zirconium oxide.[text 5] In an August 2009 peer-reviewed paper Akira Kitamura (Kobe University) et al. reported replication of this experiment.[85http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion

So let’s look at the physics of Cold Fusion and it’s ‘explosive’ power.

1. ” Heat burst is caused by cold fusion in Pd tube. Lots of heat released makes the temperature of Pd tube rise to thousands of degrees and the heavy water around it vaporizes rapidly, the heavy water vapor raises the pressure in the cell rapidly, and the explosion occurs.” http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ZhangXontheexplo.pdf pg 3 S A basic pressure cooker ‘explosion’.

2. “SRI explosion due to wayward piece of Teflon? The final report on the fatal explosion of a cold-fusion experiment at SRI International (SF#80) blames a loose piece of Teflon that may have blocked a gas outlet tube. Possible scenario: After many hours, the researchers finally noticed something was awry. When A. Riley lifted the cell from its water bath, it exploded. “The investigators believe that hot palladium ignited the pressurized mixture of oxygen and deuterium. The bottom blew off the cell, turning the rest of it into a rocket which shot upwards at 50 metres per second. It struck Riley in the head.” http://www.science-frontiers.com/sf083/sf083c16.htm

“Bockris says 30 or 40 such explosions have occurred in his laboratory. In most cases, they forced the top off the steel cell; six times, the bottom blew out. But these explosion caused little damage, perhaps because the palladium wires do not have a large enough surface to catalyse a big explosion.

The explosion at SRI International was far more powerful. Three other researchers apart from Riley were hit by flying debris, including Michael McKubre, who is in charge of SRI’s research on cold fusion.

McKubre has been experimenting with cells in which the experiments are kept under pressures of 60 atmospheres. But the cell that exploded, measuring only 5 centimetres in diameter and 20 cm high, was running at normal atmospheric pressure. According to Bockris, who talked to McKubre after the explosion, the cell was not even airtight at the time, so pressure could not have built up slowly inside it.” http://nuclearpowerblog.blogspot.com/2008/04/old-news-about-epri-cold-fusion-work.html Again a basic pressure cooker or boiler type explosion – the key here seems to be the 60 atmosphere cell could easily have built up way more pressure before it blew even though not airtight if the volume of gas overwhelmed the small openings.

After more than 20 years trying desperately to get the full truth exposed without a single penny of compensation, government harassment, government trolls, ordinary trolls, massive censorship, failure of any of my debunkers to actually address the full information of my referenced efforts, continued rebuttal of rediculous government propaganda disinfo, and a populace that doesn’t really want to know the truth – I’m f!cking tired of it and on vacation. Believe the propaganda for all I care.

To the very few of you that have actually read my efforts and Thanked me, Thank You. You are the reason for my efforts. To date, the only person I have some faith rebgarding Neutron Nukes in the WTC truths is Donald Fox and who knows how long that will last. It’s hard to resist the massive power of the US propaganda, money, black ops, government harassment, etc, et al.

Believe what you want to believe – Cold Fusion, baseball velocity and the Time machine needed to to bring it back to 2001 is what destroyed the towers.

【Pure Fusion Warheads The small tactical battlefield neutron bomb is the closest kin to a pure-fusion device.

The principle difference is that in a pure-fusion device, the plutonium fission component is entirely eliminated.

The pure-fusion device relies on the same deuterium-tritium mixture to create its burst of high-energy neutrons, but is designed to accomplish this “burn” without the use of any fissionable material. Thus, while still packing a neutron wallop, its explosive yield – the part that does the most physical damage – is much smaller because it lacks the fission component.

What little explosive yield remains can be as little as one hundredth the size of the small tactical battlefield neutron bomb.】

【To understand the reasons behind this concern, consider the small sizes into which very respectable yields can be packaged.

Warheads whose weight lies in the 30 to 150 pound range can “have yields as low as 50 tons (high explosive equivalent) to tens of kilotons, several times the size of the first nuclear weapons that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The most available warheads and easiest to manage would be in the 100 ton to 1 or 2 kiloton range.

Insofar as size is concerned, an implosion nuclear warhead could be as small as a soccer ball and weigh less than 50 pounds. 】

Just some nuke facts from Mr. Neutron Bomb… Cohen retitled the book in its final printing, “F!CK YOU, Mr. President!”

Cohen points out that the neutron bomb doesn’t have the collateral damage of fallout, blast and heat effects that occurred in Hiroshima, but enhanced neutron flash radiation: `in about a thousandth of a second it will seriously irradiate enemy soldiers (in tanks, self-propelled artillery vehicles, armored personnel carriers, in field bunkers, and most other places where they may be) out to a distance of about half to three-quarters of a mile for a warhead yield of a kiloton… Roughly half will die, most rather quickly from shock to the central nervous system. … What doesn’t it do? Well, for start-offs, when the war is over the civilian areas — villages, towns, cities — will be in just about the shape they were in before it started. There will be no lingering radioactivity [residual doses from neutron induced activity in soil are insignificant compared to the flash dose of neutrons, and it decays quickly as in Hiroshima] prevent occupation of these areas; in fact, they can be reentered almost immediately.

Also a nice read…

DECAY RATE. The decay rate of radioactive

materials from a single weapon can be determined with fair accuracy by using the ABCM1A1 radiac calculator, which is a component of the M28A1 calculator set or by using newly developed automated aids. To make a quick estimate of fallout decay, analysts decrease the intensity by a factor of ten as the time after the burst increases by multiples of seven. For example, a dose rate of 50 cGy/hour at 1 hour after the burst decays to 5 cGy/hour in 7 hours and to about 0.50 cGy/hour in 49 hours. Boundaries for significant areas of newly deposited fallout are based on dose rates. For short-term (24-hour) occupancy of an area, the dose rate is 20 cGy/hour at 1 hour after the burst. For longer term occupancy, the dose rate is 10 cGy/hour at1 hour after the burst. FM 3-12 and FM 3-22 contain specific details of fallout prediction, decay, and total dose calculations.

Craters caused by surface and shallow subsurface bursts will be contaminated by neutron-induced radiation and residual radioactive fission products. The activity in and around the crater can be estimated one hour after detonation, and the decay rate established as discussed above. http://nige.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/fm101-31-1.pdf

“How can he have so many arms to beat you with, if he does not borrow them from you?

The feet that trample down your cities, where does he get them if they are not your own?

How does he have any power over you except through you?

How would he dare assail you if he had no cooperation from you?

What could he do to you if you yourselves did not connive with the thief who plunders you, if you were not accomplices of the murderer who kills you, if you were not traitors to yourselves?

You sow your crops in order that he may ravage them, you install and furnish your homes to give him goods to pillage; you rear your daughters that he may gratify his lust; you bring up your children in order that he may confer upon them the greatest privilege he knows—to be led into his battles, to be delivered to butchery, to be made the servants of his greed and the instruments of his vengeance; you yield your bodies unto hard labor in order that he may indulge in his delights and wallow in his filthy pleasures; you weaken yourselves in order to make him the stronger and the mightier to hold you in check.

From all these indignities, such as the very beasts of the field would not endure, you can deliver yourselves if you try, not by taking action, but merely by willing to be free.

Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed.

I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break into pieces?”

WTC 9th Anniversary Over – Proven Murder & Treason Has Made It Through Another Year (on to the next atrocity) – The 10th Will Make ‘Caveman Terrorism’ & BS* = Official US History with Pensions and Praises for All the REAL Murderers.

Like this:

(Update 1-23-14: Note the Two Nuke Clouds Rising – Most Likely Scenario: Off center towards the left dark/light cloud in the first frame rising, a split second prior to the white cloud rising. Both bases expanding horizontally exponentially, as are the vertical column nuclear clouds. The blasts are in perpendicular sides of the WTC indicating it would take two nuclear charges per section which would double the number of .o2 kiloton nukes used on WTC1, and WTC2 in my previous ‘number of nukes needed’. A video of a 23 kiloton nuke 1946, 1,278 times more powerful than the nukes used on the WTC and a ‘classic nuke, not a neutron nuke, while the size of the cloud is dependent primarily on yield, the basic cloud structure and color changes remain essentially the same for that type nuclear weapon – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-l6Q8Q1smwg . The difference in cloud color in the two blasts seems to indicate two different ‘classes’, or ‘types’ of neutron nukes used. The darker cloud the old style neutron nuke, and the lighter cloud a pure fusion neutron nuke – it would make a needed comparison for damage of the old vs new nukes. My apologies, I saw the nuke on the left immediately and was supposed to note it here. If I remember correctly, the variance in color caused me to pause and the note did not make the article. Occasionally, the one man army as I have been described by an astute fellow on the net, misses something. So, while I don’t like a screw up, it gets noted.)

The Current Irrefutable Conclusion = Treason, Murder and Crimes Against Humanity for 9-11, the Iraq War, and Revocation of Constitutional Rights of US Citizens – All US ‘representatives’ appropriate US citizens, and non citizens, need to be on trial in Constitutional Courts.The Current ‘Basic’ Proven 9-11 Nuke Evidence – (About 95 to 98% of the TOTAL evidence covered) – All proven basic physics/chemistry ANY high school graduate should understand after the basic courses.:

1. Three Massive WTC Craters – See us government LIDAR proof: – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm – Best

I did a program with Bill Deagle – not online yet – about the only thing discussed that hasn’t been already been explained – ‘Swiss Cheese’ Steel = Extremely High Concentrations of Chlorine + Very High Temperatures = Classic Oxidation/Reduction Reaction = Steel undergoing MASSIVE oxidation by chlorine. wherever exposed to WTC pile atmosphere.

2. 100% Accurate/Verifiable Voting – FIXED VOTE = NO VOTE. Note – There is no need to sign the petition, just read the information contained and hopefully, act upon it. BTW – The perfect cheap FIXED VOTE yard sign – After the next sham election, grab a few old yard signs that are being discarded after the election. Pick up a nice STANDOUT color paint (not a background color) for ‘your new political sign’ from ‘home of the pot’ – since it’s so cheap – I’m thinking FLUORESCENT – Paint/Spray – FIXED VOTE = NO VOTE! across it as big as signage will allow, put a word each on a few signs, however you want to do it – just make sure you make it known the vote is fixed and you aren’t voting until there is a candidate who’s main platform consists of ‘verified voting’ and original intent interpretation of the Constitution being followed completely. Voting only helps the sham/crime succeed. http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/FIXEDVOTEhttps://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2009/10/23/fixed-vote-no-vote-i-will-not-assist-thin-air-vote-counting

5. Too many to list with credit, USS Liberty, Torture, Rendition, Gulf of Tonkin, WW II attack known, Agent Orange, DU, Nuke Testing spread radiation throughout US, CIA has murdered millions in foreign countries over the decades – that list alone would need a top 100, the PROVEN death and destruction list over time is MASSIVE. Zionism has ruled mankind from the beginning and it’s never been stopped – the ‘MORE EQUALS’ continue to rule…

My continued thanks to Jeff Rense of Rense.com for the first and main coverage of Nukes in the WTCs on 911.

Updates:

The Old Style Nuclear Fission Bombs Calculator – A small DOS program Nuclear.exe. Available here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/files/ Just download Nuclear.exe. Type 1 at the prompt, then type in the size of the nuke in kilotons. Example a 150 kiloton would be typed in the prompt as 150. A 2 MEGATON would be 2000. Enter 1 again for more information on the same size nuke. Repeat for any size you want. The bombs in the WTC were most likely around 0.018 kilotons, so you would enter .018 at the prompt.

History Channel Molten Metal At Ground Zero – The World Trade Center, Rise and Fall of an American Icon, Richard Riggs amongst a background of nuclear devastion talks about molten metal. 42 seconds http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ogrupgt4mI

What Is Wrong With the US government and all its accessories before and after the fact? Nothing that Work Strikes, Boycotts, Trials*, Accountability, and a quick dance at the end of a rope won’t fix. * Constitutional Trials: Based on all ‘laws’ and ‘rights’ granted or denied by the Original Intent Interpretation of the Constitution and in particular the Bill of Rights – The only interpretation allowed by the Constitution.

Dr. Ed Ward MD, AS, BS, MD – Reporting and investigating Constitutional abuses of the US government for almost 2 decades. AS, BS in Medical Technology – Minor in Organic Chemistry and Physics, volunteer during the Viet Nam war 6 years stateside active duty ‘med tech’ ‘US Air Farce’ – a decade experience in Medical Technology. MD degree from LSU, New Orleans – 2 decades in the field of General Practice. (My) Articles are also referenced by valid experts in their field.

About: Ed Ward, MD’s Blog of Referenced Facts, and Me, Dr Ed Ward, MD Congratulations! If you’ve made it here, you’ve made it through a MASSIVE Maze of government propaganda, censorship, and Psyops. To the Best of my Knowledge and Evaluation, You will only find the referenced, pertinent facts for the ID and Remedy of Our governments fascism, as well as world wide government fascism here… Continues https://edwardmd.wordpress.com/about/ Dr Ed

2. Trace definition as it applies to quantity:
Occurring in extremely small amounts or in quantities less than a standard limit (In the case of tritium, this standard level would be 20 TUs – the high of quoted standard background levels.). http://www.thefreedictionary.com/trace

5. In 2001 normal background levels of Tritium are supposedly around 20 TUs (prior to nuclear testing in the 60’s, normal background tritium water levels were 5 to 10 TUs – http://www.hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q2282.html ). However, groundwater studies show a significanlty less water concentration:
Groundwater age estimation using tritium only provides semi-quantitative, “ball park” values:
• <0.8 TU indicates submodern water (prior to 1950s)
• 0.8 to 4 TU indicates a mix of submodern and modern water
• 5 to 15 TU indicates modern water (<5 to 10 years)
• 15 to 30 TU indicates some bomb tritiumhttp://www.grac.org/agedatinggroundwater.pdf But, instead of “5 to 15 TU” (which would make the increase in background levels even higher), I will use 20 TUs as the 2001 environmental level to give all possible credibility to the lie of “Traces”.

9. Over one year ago, Steven Jones, Alex Jones, Fetzer, Wood, most of the “BYU crew”, most of the so called “911 Truth” groups/sites and indeed the public at large have been notified by me of the falseness of the “Traces” lie, but instead of promoting the truth and addressing it, have simply run from it and seem to be doing all in their power to suppress it. http://www.rense.com/general80/prov.htm