"we" = between a thousand and ten thousand? ten thousand to fifty thousand? fifty thousand to a million? more? The phrase in the title is a subjective opinion, so the exact number is unknown and irrelevant anyway

"we" = all residents of the same country? Romania? Another European country? is a country in Asia relevant? North America? South America? Africa? Australia? Oceania? The location is not relevant

We - the members of certain organisation? NoPeople sharing common beliefs? In a sense religion? No religion involved political views? YES, politics is all that matters in this puzzle hobby? physical features? No to the rest

To clarify: "We" are people sharing some views on politics as a whole.

Was "it" organised (performed/whatever can be done with it)some way in past and it is organised better now? "We" think the opposite, but in a humorous way

If so, [LTPF list of centuries and decades] for when it changed. It never really changed at some point in history

Is "it" organised some way now but we think it may be done better? Yes, but again in a humorous way

Is "it" organised some way now and we think it is organised well but there are some circumstances, under which other way would be better? Noish

Is two of anything relevant? The title gives a hint to the solutionThe number two? The number in itself no, but two of something

Elections relevant? National politics? International? State? Local?

Schools of political thought in general? Politics in general, as perceived by "we"Are "we" part of the US? PossiblyUK? DittoOther relevant country? It can be any country. "We" are simple citizens that look in the political arena and feel that it might be better in another way

So... first century AD... Times of early Caesars are relevant, right? Roman Republic is not relevant, correct? Is the relevant issue: electing politicians? paying politicians? taxes? transparency? conditions to fulfill to become a politician?

So... first century AD... Times of early Caesars are relevant, right? YesRoman Republic is not relevant, correct? YesIs the relevant issue: electing politicians? Yes!paying politicians? Notaxes? Notransparency? Noconditions to fulfill to become a politician? Yes!

Consul Incitatus relevant? Well, I guess we have a winner as wel, thrice in a rowIs the idea that sometimes it's better to have a .. as consul than a .. as .. ? *** SPOILER ***

While we were having a small talk a few days ago, concerning polititics and politicians, together with some friends we decided that Incitatus -- the famous horse of Caligula, made a senator and a consul -- might be a better version that our elected officials.

The hint in the title -- with two of these you cannot win -- was a reference to the the fact that, normally, with two knights and a king versus a king, you cannot force a checkmate.