hmm... where do i start? the teacher who can't find a way
to dial my number and explain why the grade I was supposed
to get, wasn't? or this useless drivel of a diary entry :
http://advogato
.org/person/badvogato/? amazing, how one can just
check the diary entries of one or two folks, and lo and
behold some feels compelled to poke fun at you.

We just watched a great movie on television, called "The
Crow". Now, I don't proclaim to be a Gothic fan or
anything, but that was some movie. The storyline is great,
the action rivals that of Jean Claude Van Damme and Clint
Eastwood, and the potrayal of the Gothic movement is second
to none.

I learned a valuable lesson today. That lesson is this:
there will always be idiots in your life, both in everyday
life and on the Internet. Yeah, go ahead and sue for
libel. If you do, I'll lay down the hammer by suing for
copyright infringement, slander and libel. Looks like
another talk with my attourney is in order. Anyway, all
those annoyances of life aside, some people will just never
admit their wrongdoings. Not to save their soul.

So,
I'll do the admirable thing: ignore the trolls and the
liars and let them wallow in their own misery. I'm just
going to use this site for what it was meant to be used
for, unlike some others who like to start public battles on
here. You know who you are.

jcv: sure that will get the response you want from
Mr. Bill Gates, or was that to bait him? :) I'm definitely
no operating system officiando myself, but i do know that
there is much space wasted on machines now. all for what?
so we can have longer file names?

I have been asking around on the Internet about this. What
is the better way to design a server-side web application?
Page-to-Page or have all the pages embedded in one page?
This has been an obstacle for me. Any input on this would
be greatly appreciated.

not some "I am sorry but I do not understand what I did
wrong" cop-out. You very clearly know what you did that
was malicious. Care to have me spell it out, again?

Why is it that you feel compelled to continue this
shenanigan of "all you have to do is ask an OP politely"
when you know very clearly that I did ask politely, but
none of the OP's felt there was a need to respond to my
request of being allowed to both sit in the channel AND
participate in the conversation? Please explain.

Again, two of the deals to this agreement were that (a) you
remove your past articles that mentioned my name or were
about me; and (b) you apologize.

I have seen neither of those done, therefore I can only
assume that you don't know the difference between right and
wrong, treating people fairly and unfairly. Furthermore, I
must assume that you know clearly that what you did was
wrong.

Please explain to the rest of us how you translated a
statment of protecting my rights "do not steal my photos
again or I will take you to court" into a so-called
threat. Are you telling me that if a police officer tells
you "if I catch you speeding again, I will give you a
ticket instead of a warning", that you feel the police
officer were a troll or a threat to society? It's called
the law ... and respect ... Christian. And, I pity you for
your feeling that you have everything to lose by
apologizing for what you did, and that instead you must
try to sound like you are sorry while in the same breath
telling yourself that you will never apologize.

Until I hear an apology from you this won't go away. Make
it easy for all of us, Christian. Do the right thing.
Apologize like you know what you are apologizing for. It
isn't that difficult.

+++ ChipX86
---apologize on advogato.org for your actions directed
toward bytesplit
---delete all of your articles that were in reference to
bytesplit on advogato.org
---permanently take my photo out of your possession and the
possession of others (if you haven't already done so)

This will remove any of my anger and resentment held toward
you. I have asked you to do some of this before, I am a
very fair guy. This will enable us to wipe our slates
clean with each other, and even if we don't care to cross
each other's path again, will allow us to interact in the
future as if nothing astray happened in the past. Okay?

perrier: then
the only way i can respond to you at the moment is that you
don't know Christian very well. i pity the fool who falls
for the good reference given by a man speaking out of
ignorance. if you don't believe me, then you can not be
helped. furthermore, all sugar coating of yours aside,
Christian has NOT handled this so-called saga with
maturity. he never publicly apologized for his actions.
that, my friend, is acting like a grown man. if you don't
get the gist of what i just said there, then i have reason
to question not only Christian's integrity, but yours too.
perhaps you could take heed to what i just said. at some
point here i will quit arguing with these rebels who love
to hide behind the smoke and mirrors of the Internet.

ebizo: why don't you, for the mean time, just accept
ANY job so that you are bringing in some income. while you
are holding the job you can be out looking for something
you really want and need. let go of your pride for your
own sake.

Is defending the law and person's rights grounds for
being called a troll?

LSchiere:
So you think that a person who is obviously talking about
legal issues is lying? Do you think that most people would
call you a troll or be less likely to believe you if
someone had infringed upon your privacy and personal
property, and you decided to tell about it? I think not.