George Bernard Shaw’s Saint Joan was first produced in New York City in 1923 and in London in 1924. Shaw published it with a long Preface in 1924. When word came out that Shaw, who was known as an irreverent jokester, was writing about a Christian saint and martyr, there were fears that he would not be able to produce something appropriate, but the early reception of the play was generally favorable, although some commentators criticized him for historical inaccuracy and for being too talky or comic. Over the years, the play, a rare tragic work in his generally comic oeuvre, has been seen as one of his greatest and most important. It has been hailed as being intellectually exciting and praised for dealing with important themes, such as nationalism, war, and the relation of the individual to society. The play solidified Shaw’s reputation as a major playwright and helped win him the Nobel Prize in 1925.

Being at least in part a tragedy, though with comic moments, Saint Joan is part of a shift in Shaw’s work from his earlier optimistic comedies to a more melancholy attitude, perhaps in part the result of his reaction to World War I.

Although he had been thinking about Joan of Arc as early as 1913, Shaw did not actually begin writing the play until 1923, three years after Joan’s canonization. He consulted many earlier works on Joan, including the transcripts of her trial. In fact, he modestly said that he had done little more than reproduce Joan’s own words as recorded in the transcripts; however, that statement is unfair to Shaw, who left a distinctive Shavian touch on the story of the martyred saint.

YOU MAY ALSO FIND THESE DOCUMENTS HELPFUL

...The road to happiness
“For over two thousand years it has been the custom among earnest moralists to decry happiness as something degraded and unworthy [p. 117 top].” An expression of disdain for happiness generally means that it is other people’s happiness that you disdain. Maybe you selflessly sacrifice your own happiness for mankind; you still are apt to fall into envy of those happy people who are less...

...BertrandRussell on Human Nature, Construction vs. Destruction, and Science as a Key to Democracy
On the art of acquiring "a high degree of intellectual culture without emotional atrophy."
In 1926, British philosopher, mathematician, historian, and social critic BertrandRussell – whose 10 commandments of teaching endure as a timeless manifesto for education, whose poignant admonition is among history's greatest insights on love, whose...

...
Bertrand Russell’s, “The Value of Philosophy” aimed at informing society the importance studying philosophy. It is not only for one’s own mind, but also for others around them as well. A union between the self and the not-self could easily be formed through the study of philosophy. In his thesis he states that philosophy should not be studied for the sake of achieving definite answers, but for the sake of asking questions. I agree with his thesis and look at philosophy in a...

...﻿BertrandRussell embraces the Cartesian technique of radical doubt. Descartes first employed it in his philosophical writings that held confusion about ordinary things.
Russell starts by asking the reader to consider what knowledge exists that can be known beyond reasonable doubt. His purpose is to produce the realization that radical doubt soon brings even the most self-evident assumptions in our everyday lives under reconsideration. At first...

...﻿BertrandRussell critique of Christianity Why I Am Not a Christian begins by first defining a Christian as a, “person who believes in God, immortality and also believes that Christ is the most divine, best and wisest of all men.” Russell believes that the world has changed since the time of St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas. Russell utilizes a series of different arguments to explain how the Christian religion does more harm than...

...your own definition of leisure and define the purposes you think it should for individuals and/or societies. How does your view relate to what Russell presents about leisure in his text “In Praise of Idleness”? In the rest of your essay, discuss to what extent Russell’s ideas about work and leisure are still valid in the contemporary society.
BertrandRussell was a British philosopher, mathematician and historian. He published many essays and books...

...﻿I should like to say two things, one intellectual and one moral.
The intellectual thing I should want to say is this: When you are studying any matter, or considering any philosophy, ask yourself only what the facts are and what the truth that the facts bear out is. Never let yourself be diverted either by what you wish to believe, or by what you think would have beneficent social effects if it were believed. But look only, and solely, at what are the facts. That is the intellectual thing...

...The purpose of this paper is to show that while Ernst Mach and BertrandRussell share similar views on matter and knowledge, their end conclusions differ.
Mach believes humans think in an economical manner where past experiences and knowledge are systematically reorganized to fit a pattern (Mach 211). Rather than analysing each experience in detail, humans refer to similar or related experiences as groups, which allows for the “least expenditure of thought” (Mach...