ObamaCare: Whether You Like Your Privacy or Not, You Don’t Get to Keep It

In a proposed rule from Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the federal government is demanding insurance companies submit detailed health care information about their patients.

The HHS has proposed the federal government pursue one of three paths to obtain this sensitive information: A “centralized approach” wherein insurers’ data go directly to Washington; an “intermediate state-level approach” in which insurers give the information to the 50 states; or a “distributed approach” in which health insurance companies crunch the numbers according to federal bureaucrat edict.

—

There are major problems with any one of these three “options.” First is the obvious breach of patient confidentiality. The federal government does not exactly have a stellar track record when it comes to managing private information about its citizens.

—

The second concern is the government compulsion to seize details about private business practices. Certainly many health insurance companies defended and advocated for the president’s health care law, but they likely did not know this was part of the bargain.

They are being asked to provide proprietary information to governments for purposes that will undermine their competitiveness. Obama and Sebelius made such a big deal about Americans being able to keep the coverage they have under ObamaCare; with these provisions, such private insurance may cease to exist if insurers are required to divulge their business models.

Bryan Preston has been a leading conservative blogger and opinionator since founding his first blog in 2001. Bryan is a military veteran, worked for NASA, was a founding blogger and producer at Hot Air, was producer of the Laura Ingraham Show and, most recently before joining PJM, was Communications Director of the Republican Party of Texas.

Click here to view the 7 legacy comments

Click here to hide legacy comments

7 Comments, 6 Threads

1.
Allston

“Whether You Like Your Privacy or Not, You Don’t Get to Keep It”

Odd…we didn’t see that occur with Barry-O’s birth certificate, now did we? Or his college writings, or his grades.

The Obamacare “secrets revealed” database sounds just dandy. What could possibly go wrong?

True or not, I’ve read many IRS systems, which contain SS numbers and income stats, are considered among the most porous, hackable and vulnerable.

The Obamacare database with personal healthcare information has “disaster waiting to happen” written all over it.

And, yes, requiring inside business details is all part of the grand plan. Through accident or design your competitive advantages are leaked to a hapless competitor who immediately implements similar strategies. No more advantage, no more competition.

Civil Money Penalties. OCR may impose a penalty on a covered entity for a failure to comply with a requirement of the Privacy Rule. Penalties will vary significantly depending on factors such as the date of the violation, whether the covered entity knew or should have known of the failure to comply, or whether the covered entity’s failure to comply was due to willful neglect. Penalties may not exceed a calendar year cap for multiple violations of the same requirement.

The table didn’t copy and paste, but for violations after 2/18/09, it can be “$50,000 or more per violation” with a cap of $1,500,000.

Oh, and then there’s the criminal penalties:

Criminal Penalties. A person who knowingly obtains or discloses individually identifiable health information in violation of the Privacy Rule may face a criminal penalty of up to $50,000 and up to one-year imprisonment. The criminal penalties increase to $100,000 and up to five years imprisonment if the wrongful conduct involves false pretenses, and to $250,000 and up to 10 years imprisonment if the wrongful conduct involves the intent to sell, transfer, or use identifiable health information for commercial advantage, personal gain or malicious harm. The Department of Justice is responsible for criminal prosecutions under the Privacy Rule.

Will HHS and other government agencies be subject to the same penalties?

With Sebelius’ HHS and Holder’s DOJ in charge of enforcement? Only an idiot or an Obama supporter (but I repeat myself) could think that the government will be held to the same standards of accountability.

Hmmmmm…..Wasn’t a right to privacy from the prying eyes of government, with regards to medical procedures, the essence of the left’s sacrosanct Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court decision?

And since health insurance companies are forbidden from doing interstate business, doesn’t that essentially nullify any regulatory authority the federal government can claim over the insurance companies’ intrastate activities?