If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Things that aren’t abhorrent to Muslims include underwear bombs, smuggling weapons and stabbing guards. Also terrorizing a country to the extent that passengers are groped in airports.

There’s a pattern with rulings such as these. If the judge had determined that groin searches are a general civil liberties violation that would be one thing. But this is a special privilege and entitlement for Muslims.

A federal judge on Thursday ordered the military to stop touching the groins of detainees at the prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, when they are moved from their cells to speak with lawyers. >>>

It would abhorrent to just about everyone. So why grant Muslims special privileges in this regard? Does having a recognized cultural and religious aversion to a universally abhorred procedure really provide special rights to be exempted from it?

Colonel Bogdan introduced the new procedures in May, after a raid in which guards forced protesting detainees into lockdown in their individual cells. After the raid, officials said they found improvised weapons.

But fortunately Americans don’t have a cultural or religious aversion to being murdered by terrorists.

And what about the American Ambassador who was sodomized before he was killed? Was that not abhorrent to Muslims? We don't care for it either, but that doesn't stop the TSA... after 3000 Americans were killed by these thugs. Popularized by the first Mooslim President (worshipped in all 57 states according to American Pravda).