Changes for RFC6733http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/2012-10-26T00:23:08-07:00History of change entries for RFC6733.[ (System)] RFC published [rev. RFC]2012-10-26T00:23:08-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-307743RFC published[ (System)] IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor [rev. 34]2012-07-30T14:15:06-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-323722IANA Action state changed to <b>RFC-Ed-Ack</b> from Waiting on RFC Editor[ (System)] IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors [rev. 34]2012-07-26T15:38:54-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-323713IANA Action state changed to <b>Waiting on RFC Editor</b> from Waiting on Authors[ (System)] IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress [rev. 34]2012-07-17T18:56:39-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-323680IANA Action state changed to <b>Waiting on Authors</b> from In Progress[Glen Zorn] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-34.txt [rev. 34]2012-06-22T20:16:47-07:00Glen Zornhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-290345New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-34.txt</b>[ (System)] IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors [rev. 33]2012-06-04T14:49:09-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-323537IANA Action state changed to <b>In Progress</b> from Waiting on Authors[ (System)] IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress [rev. 33]2012-05-21T12:18:07-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-323506IANA Action state changed to <b>Waiting on Authors</b> from In Progress[Amy Vezza] State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent [rev. 33]2012-05-14T17:16:03-07:00Amy Vezzahttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-280971State changed to <b>RFC Ed Queue</b> from Approved-announcement sent[Benoit Claise] Ballot writeup was changed [rev. 33]2012-05-08T01:45:32-07:00Benoit Claisehttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-280420Ballot writeup was changed[Benoit Claise] Ballot writeup was changed [rev. 33]2012-05-08T01:40:28-07:00Benoit Claisehttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-280412Ballot writeup was changed[ (System)] IANA Action state changed to In Progress [rev. 33]2012-05-07T09:39:00-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-323475IANA Action state changed to <b>In Progress</b>[Amy Vezza] State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent [rev. 33]2012-05-07T09:20:34-07:00Amy Vezzahttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-280301State changed to <b>Approved-announcement sent</b> from Approved-announcement to be sent[Amy Vezza] IESG has approved the document [rev. 33]2012-05-07T09:20:34-07:00Amy Vezzahttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-280300IESG has approved the document[Amy Vezza] Closed "Approve" ballot [rev. 33]2012-05-07T09:20:33-07:00Amy Vezzahttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-287001Closed &quot;Approve&quot; ballot[Amy Vezza] Ballot approval text was generated [rev. 33]2012-05-07T09:20:12-07:00Amy Vezzahttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-280299Ballot approval text was generated[Amy Vezza] Ballot writeup was changed [rev. 33]2012-05-07T09:19:20-07:00Amy Vezzahttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-280298Ballot writeup was changed[Benoit Claise] State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup [rev. 33]2012-05-07T07:32:46-07:00Benoit Claisehttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-280281State changed to <b>Approved-announcement to be sent</b> from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup[Glen Zorn] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-33.txt [rev. 33]2012-05-07T00:34:16-07:00Glen Zornhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-280244New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-33.txt</b>[Pete Resnick] [Ballot comment] Thanks for addressing all of my comments. It seems you missed a few ... [rev. 32]2012-05-05T12:49:45-07:00Pete Resnickhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-280198[Ballot comment]<br />Thanks for addressing all of my comments. It seems you missed a few things in the conversion from ...[Pete Resnick] Ballot comment text updated for Pete Resnick [rev. 32]2012-05-05T12:49:45-07:00Pete Resnickhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-280197Ballot comment text updated for Pete Resnick[spt] [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss [rev. 32]2012-04-30T04:27:59-07:00spthttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-279781[Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss[Glen Zorn] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-32.txt [rev. 32]2012-04-20T01:12:58-07:00Glen Zornhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-278832New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-32.txt</b>[Brian Haberman] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman [rev. 31]2012-03-31T01:23:52-07:00Brian Habermanhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-277543[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman[Benoit Claise] Responsible AD changed to Benoit Claise from Dan Romascanu [rev. 31]2012-03-29T10:42:33-07:00Benoit Claisehttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-277399Responsible AD changed to <b>Benoit Claise</b> from <b>Dan Romascanu</b>[Robert Sparks] [Ballot comment] Thanks for addressing my concerns. [rev. 31]2012-03-29T06:57:43-07:00Robert Sparkshttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-277258[Ballot comment]<br />Thanks for addressing my concerns.[Robert Sparks] [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss [rev. 31]2012-03-29T06:57:43-07:00Robert Sparkshttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-277257[Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss[Benoit Claise] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Benoit Claise [rev. 31]2012-03-29T05:11:52-07:00Benoit Claisehttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-277194[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Benoit Claise[Peter Saint-Andre] [Ballot comment] Thank you for addressing my concerns about the IANA considerations. I have two ... [rev. 31]2012-03-12T09:06:34-07:00Peter Saint-Andrehttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-274233[Ballot comment]<br />Thank you for addressing my concerns about the IANA considerations. I have two other comments:<br /><br />1. In Section ...[Peter Saint-Andre] Ballot comment text updated for Peter Saint-Andre [rev. 31]2012-03-12T09:06:34-07:00Peter Saint-Andrehttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-274232Ballot comment text updated for Peter Saint-Andre[Peter Saint-Andre] [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to No Objection from Discuss [rev. 31]2012-03-12T09:06:00-07:00Peter Saint-Andrehttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-274231[Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to No Objection from Discuss[spt] [Ballot discuss] revised based on -31 #1) addressed #2) addressed #3) addressed #4) addressed #5) ... [rev. 31]2012-03-12T07:54:29-07:00spthttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-274200[Ballot discuss]<br />revised based on -31<br /><br />#1) addressed<br /><br />#2) addressed<br /><br />#3) addressed<br /><br />#4) addressed<br /><br />#5) addressed<br /><br />#6) addressed<br /><br />#7) addressed ...[spt] [Ballot comment] #18) s5.2: Name matching has proved to be a challenge for many in ... [rev. 31]2012-03-12T07:54:29-07:00spthttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-274199[Ballot comment]<br />#18) s5.2: Name matching has proved to be a challenge for many in the TLS/DTLS environment ...[spt] Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Sean Turner [rev. 31]2012-03-12T07:54:29-07:00spthttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-274198Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Sean Turner[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot comment] Since -31 says that Diameter MUST be used with one of TLS, DTLS ... [rev. 31]2012-03-11T04:28:07-07:00Stephen Farrellhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-273998[Ballot comment]<br /><br />Since -31 says that Diameter MUST be used with one of TLS, DTLS or IPsec,<br />that clears my ...[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to Yes from Discuss [rev. 31]2012-03-11T04:28:07-07:00Stephen Farrellhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-273997[Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to Yes from Discuss[Glen Zorn] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-31.txt [rev. 31]2012-03-11T04:10:57-07:00Glen Zornhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-273996New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-31.txt</b>[Robert Sparks] [Ballot discuss] (Updated for -30, removing what's been addressed - we're making progress in email ... [rev. 30]2012-03-08T12:40:02-08:00Robert Sparkshttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-273744[Ballot discuss]<br />(Updated for -30, removing what&#39;s been addressed - we&#39;re making progress in email on these last two - thanks!)<br /><br /><br />This ...[Robert Sparks] [Ballot comment] In section 2, 2nd to last paragraph before section 2.1: This edit (moving ... [rev. 30]2012-03-08T12:40:02-08:00Robert Sparkshttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-273743[Ballot comment]<br /><br />In section 2, 2nd to last paragraph before section 2.1: This edit (moving<br />how tranparency is described ...[Robert Sparks] Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Robert Sparks [rev. 30]2012-03-08T12:40:02-08:00Robert Sparkshttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-273742Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Robert Sparks[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot discuss] Hopefully this is a no-brainer and just a simple clarification is needed. (-30 ... [rev. 30]2012-03-08T02:14:25-08:00Stephen Farrellhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-273638[Ballot discuss]<br />Hopefully this is a no-brainer and just a simple clarification is needed.<br />(-30 is the same as -29 ...[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot comment] - The IPR declaration confuses me. RFC 3588 is dated September 2003. The ... [rev. 30]2012-03-08T02:14:25-08:00Stephen Farrellhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-273637[Ballot comment]<br /><br />- The IPR declaration confuses me. RFC 3588 is dated September 2003.<br />The declaration says it relates to a ...[Stephen Farrell] Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Stephen Farrell [rev. 30]2012-03-08T02:14:25-08:00Stephen Farrellhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-273636Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Stephen Farrell[ (System)] Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed [rev. 30]2012-03-08T01:42:44-08:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-273634Sub state has been changed to <b>AD Followup</b> from <b>Revised ID Needed</b>[Glen Zorn] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-30.txt [rev. 30]2012-03-08T01:42:43-08:00Glen Zornhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-273633New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-30.txt</b>[Amy Vezza] Removed from agenda for telechat [rev. 29]2011-09-22T21:00:19-07:00Amy Vezzahttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181909Removed from agenda for telechat[Amy Vezza] State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation. [rev. 29]2011-09-22T11:40:20-07:00Amy Vezzahttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181908State changed to <b>IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed</b> from IESG Evaluation.[Adrian Farrel] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 29]2011-09-22T08:15:43-07:00Adrian Farrelhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181907[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Jari Arkko] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded [rev. 29]2011-09-22T02:48:46-07:00Jari Arkkohttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181906[Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded[Amanda Baber] IANA has a question about the instructions in this document. IANA understands that, upon approval ... [rev. 29]2011-09-21T21:51:55-07:00Amanda Baberhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181905IANA has a question about the instructions in this document.<br /><br />IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are ...[spt] [Ballot comment] #1) s1, p 8: The following indentation seems to be off: In addition ... [rev. 29]2011-09-21T20:46:17-07:00spthttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181904[Ballot comment]<br />#1) s1, p 8: The following indentation seems to be off:<br /><br />&nbsp; &nbsp; In addition to addressing the ...[spt] [Ballot discuss] #1) I'm confused by the following two statements: from abstract: The Diameter base ... [rev. 29]2011-09-21T20:46:17-07:00spthttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181903[Ballot discuss]<br />#1) I&#39;m confused by the following two statements:<br /><br />from abstract:<br /><br />&nbsp; The Diameter base protocol as defined in ...[spt] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded [rev. 29]2011-09-21T20:46:17-07:00spthttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181902[Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded[Ralph Droms] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 29]2011-09-21T19:55:26-07:00Ralph Dromshttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181901[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Peter Saint-Andre] [Ballot comment] 1. In Section 1.3.3, this specification has "[d]eprecated the exchange of CER/CEA messages ... [rev. 29]2011-09-21T19:09:33-07:00Peter Saint-Andrehttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181900[Ballot comment]<br />1. In Section 1.3.3, this specification has &quot;[d]eprecated the exchange of CER/CEA messages ...[Peter Saint-Andre] [Ballot discuss] RFC 3588 used DNS SRV Proto values of 'tcp' and 'sctp' for the ... [rev. 29]2011-09-21T19:09:33-07:00Peter Saint-Andrehttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181899[Ballot discuss]<br />RFC 3588 used DNS SRV Proto values of &#39;tcp&#39; and &#39;sctp&#39; for the SRV Service of &#39;diameter&#39;. 3588bis ...[Peter Saint-Andre] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded [rev. 29]2011-09-21T19:09:33-07:00Peter Saint-Andrehttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181898[Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded[Stewart Bryant] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 29]2011-09-21T09:38:22-07:00Stewart Bryanthttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181897[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Pete Resnick] [Ballot comment] Overall - It took quite a while (I think until I was well ... [rev. 29]2011-09-21T08:03:18-07:00Pete Resnickhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181896[Ballot comment]<br />Overall - It took quite a while (I think until I was well into section 6) for me to ...[Pete Resnick] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 29]2011-09-21T08:03:18-07:00Pete Resnickhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181895[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Russ Housley] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 29]2011-09-21T08:00:17-07:00Russ Housleyhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181894[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Gonzalo Camarillo] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 29]2011-09-21T00:16:59-07:00Gonzalo Camarillohttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181893[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Robert Sparks] [Ballot comment] In section 1.3.1's second paragraph, starting the second sentence with "Typically," is likely ... [rev. 29]2011-09-20T14:15:36-07:00Robert Sparkshttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181892[Ballot comment]<br />In section 1.3.1&#39;s second paragraph, starting the second sentence with<br />&quot;Typically,&quot; is likely to introduce ...[Robert Sparks] [Ballot discuss] The document reflects the change of the name of the Well-Known IANA policy ... [rev. 29]2011-09-20T14:15:35-07:00Robert Sparkshttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181891[Ballot discuss]<br />The document reflects the change of the name of the Well-Known<br />IANA policy definition from &quot;IETF Consensus&quot; to ...[Robert Sparks] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded [rev. 29]2011-09-20T14:15:35-07:00Robert Sparkshttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181890[Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded[Wesley Eddy] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 29]2011-09-19T13:12:37-07:00Wesley Eddyhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181889[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Ron Bonica] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 29]2011-09-17T11:15:54-07:00Ron Bonicahttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181888[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot discuss] Hopefully this is a no-brainer and just a simple clarification is needed. 13.1 ... [rev. 29]2011-09-15T06:13:21-07:00Stephen Farrellhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181887[Ballot discuss]<br />Hopefully this is a no-brainer and just a simple clarification is needed.<br /><br />13.1 says that (D)TLS ...[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot comment] - 5.2 says that "OIDs within...certificates" can be used to "signify Diameter Server ... [rev. 29]2011-09-15T06:12:48-07:00Stephen Farrellhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181886[Ballot comment]<br />- 5.2 says that &quot;OIDs within...certificates&quot; can be used to &quot;signify<br />Diameter Server authorization&quot; - have those been ...[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot discuss] Hopefully is a no-brainer and just a simple clarification is needed. 13.1 says ... [rev. 29]2011-09-15T06:12:48-07:00Stephen Farrellhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181885[Ballot discuss]<br />Hopefully is a no-brainer and just a simple clarification is needed.<br /><br />13.1 says that (D)TLS is ...[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded [rev. 29]2011-09-15T06:12:48-07:00Stephen Farrellhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181884[Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded[Dan Romascanu] Ballot has been issued [rev. 29]2011-09-14T03:53:58-07:00Dan Romascanuhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181883Ballot has been issued[Dan Romascanu] State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead. [rev. 29]2011-09-14T03:51:26-07:00Dan Romascanuhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181882State changed to <b>IESG Evaluation</b> from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.[Dan Romascanu] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Dan Romascanu [rev. 29]2011-09-14T03:50:37-07:00Dan Romascanuhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181881[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Dan Romascanu[Dan Romascanu] Ballot has been issued [rev. 29]2011-09-14T03:50:37-07:00Dan Romascanuhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181880Ballot has been issued[Dan Romascanu] Created "Approve" ballot [rev. 29]2011-09-14T03:50:36-07:00Dan Romascanuhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-287000Created &quot;Approve&quot; ballot[Dan Romascanu] Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-09-22 [rev. 29]2011-09-14T03:38:49-07:00Dan Romascanuhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181879Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-09-22[ (System)] State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call. [rev. 29]2011-09-13T00:23:56-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181878State changed to <b>Waiting for AD Go-Ahead</b> from In Last Call.[Amy Vezza] Last call sent [rev. 29]2011-08-30T08:05:46-07:00Amy Vezzahttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181940Last call sent[Amy Vezza] State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested. The following Last Call Announcement ... [rev. 29]2011-08-30T08:05:46-07:00Amy Vezzahttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181877State changed to <b>In Last Call</b> from Last Call Requested.<br /><br /><b>The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:</b><br /><br />From: The ...[Dan Romascanu] Last Call was requested [rev. 29]2011-08-30T08:01:50-07:00Dan Romascanuhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181876Last Call was requested[Dan Romascanu] State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup. [rev. 29]2011-08-30T08:01:49-07:00Dan Romascanuhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181875State changed to <b>Last Call Requested</b> from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.[Dan Romascanu] Last Call text changed [rev. 29]2011-08-30T08:01:49-07:00Dan Romascanuhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181874Last Call text changed[Dan Romascanu] State changed to AD Evaluation::AD Followup from AD is watching::AD Followup. [rev. 29]2011-08-30T08:01:21-07:00Dan Romascanuhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181873State changed to <b>AD Evaluation::AD Followup</b> from AD is watching::AD Followup.[Dan Romascanu] Area acronym has been changed to ops from gen [rev. 29]2011-08-30T07:59:48-07:00Dan Romascanuhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181872Area acronym has been changed to <b>ops</b> from <b>gen</b>[Dan Romascanu] Last Call text changed [rev. 29]2011-08-30T07:56:09-07:00Dan Romascanuhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181871Last Call text changed[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-29.txt [rev. 29]2011-08-30T06:29:25-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181870New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-29.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-28.txt [rev. 28]2011-08-25T12:58:55-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181869New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-28.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-27.txt [rev. 27]2011-08-22T05:44:58-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181868New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-27.txt</b>[ (System)] Document has expired [rev. 26]2011-07-29T00:21:47-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181867Document has expired[ (System)] State changed to Dead from AD is watching::AD Followup. [rev. 26]2011-07-29T00:21:47-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181866State changed to <b>Dead</b> from AD is watching::AD Followup.[ (System)] Document has expired [rev. 26]2011-07-25T00:21:05-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181865Document has expired[ (System)] State changed to Dead from AD is watching::AD Followup. [rev. 26]2011-07-25T00:21:05-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181864State changed to <b>Dead</b> from AD is watching::AD Followup.[Jouni Korhonen] Submitted to IESG a while ago. [rev. 26]2011-06-15T01:14:54-07:00Jouni Korhonenhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181939Submitted to IESG a while ago.[Jouni Korhonen] IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Document [rev. 26]2011-06-15T01:14:54-07:00Jouni Korhonenhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181938IETF state changed to <b>Submitted to IESG for Publication</b> from WG Document[ (System)] Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed [rev. 26]2011-01-21T05:45:12-08:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181863Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-26.txt [rev. 26]2011-01-21T05:45:12-08:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181862New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-26.txt</b>[Dan Romascanu] State changed to AD is watching::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.At IETF-79 the ... [rev. 25]2010-11-24T05:27:18-08:00Dan Romascanuhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181861State changed to <b>AD is watching::Revised ID Needed</b> from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.<br>At IETF-79 the WG decided to ...[ (System)] State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call. [rev. 25]2010-11-16T00:20:15-08:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181860State changed to <b>Waiting for AD Go-Ahead</b> from In Last Call.[Cindy Morgan] State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Cindy Morgan [rev. 25]2010-11-02T09:04:02-07:00Cindy Morganhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181859State changed to <b>In Last Call</b> from <b>Last Call Requested</b> by Cindy Morgan[Dan Romascanu] Last Call was requested by Dan Romascanu [rev. 25]2010-11-02T07:57:42-07:00Dan Romascanuhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181858Last Call was requested by Dan Romascanu[Dan Romascanu] State changed to Last Call Requested from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Dan Romascanu [rev. 25]2010-11-02T07:57:41-07:00Dan Romascanuhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181857State changed to <b>Last Call Requested</b> from <b>Waiting for AD Go-Ahead</b> by Dan Romascanu[Amy Vezza] State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by Amy Vezza [rev. 25]2010-10-26T08:04:32-07:00Amy Vezzahttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181856State changed to <b>Waiting for AD Go-Ahead</b> from <b>In Last Call</b> by Amy Vezza[Amanda Baber] IANA has a question about the IANA Actions related to this document. In Section 11, ... [rev. 25]2010-10-22T12:17:02-07:00Amanda Baberhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181855IANA has a question about the IANA Actions related to this document.<br /><br />In Section 11, the IANA Considerations section, there ...[Amy Vezza] State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza [rev. 25]2010-10-11T08:03:30-07:00Amy Vezzahttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181854State changed to <b>In Last Call</b> from <b>Last Call Requested</b> by Amy Vezza[Dan Romascanu] Last Call was requested by Dan Romascanu [rev. 25]2010-10-11T07:11:07-07:00Dan Romascanuhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181853Last Call was requested by Dan Romascanu[ (System)] Ballot writeup text was added [rev. 25]2010-10-11T07:11:06-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181911Ballot writeup text was added[ (System)] Last call text was added [rev. 25]2010-10-11T07:11:06-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181910Last call text was added[Dan Romascanu] State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Dan Romascanu [rev. 25]2010-10-11T07:11:06-07:00Dan Romascanuhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181852State changed to <b>Last Call Requested</b> from <b>AD Evaluation</b> by Dan Romascanu[Cindy Morgan] State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Cindy Morgan [rev. 25]2010-09-20T10:05:37-07:00Cindy Morganhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181851State changed to <b>AD Evaluation</b> from <b>Publication Requested</b> by Cindy Morgan[Jari Arkko] Responsible AD has been changed to Dan Romascanu from Jari Arkko [rev. 25]2010-09-07T20:58:50-07:00Jari Arkkohttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181850Responsible AD has been changed to Dan Romascanu from Jari Arkko[Amy Vezza] [Note]: 'Jouni Korhonen (jouni.korhonen@nsn.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com) is the Document Shepherd' added by Amy Vezza [rev. 25]2010-09-03T15:12:33-07:00Amy Vezzahttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181849[Note]: &#39;Jouni Korhonen (jouni.korhonen@nsn.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com) is the Document Shepherd&#39; added by Amy Vezza[Amy Vezza] (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the Document Shepherd personally reviewed ... [rev. 25]2010-09-03T15:12:33-07:00Amy Vezzahttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181848(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Document Shepherd personally reviewed ...[Amy Vezza] [Note]: changed to 'Jouni Korhonen (jouni.korhonen@nsn.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com) is the Document Shepherd' by Amy Vezza [rev. 25]2010-09-03T15:11:59-07:00Amy Vezzahttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181847[Note]: changed to &#39;Jouni Korhonen (jouni.korhonen@nsn.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com) is the Document Shepherd&#39; by Amy Vezza[Amy Vezza] [Note]: changed to 'Jouni Korhonen (jouni.korhonen@nsn.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; is the Document Shepherd' by ... [rev. 25]2010-09-03T15:11:46-07:00Amy Vezzahttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181846[Note]: changed to &#39;Jouni Korhonen (jouni.korhonen@nsn.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com)<br>&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&nbsp; is the ...[Amy Vezza] Draft added in state Publication Requested by Amy Vezza [rev. 25]2010-09-03T15:10:27-07:00Amy Vezzahttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181845Draft added in state Publication Requested by Amy Vezza[Amy Vezza] [Note]: '(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; ... [rev. 25]2010-09-03T15:10:27-07:00Amy Vezzahttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181844[Note]: &#39;(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the<br>&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Document Shepherd ...[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-25.txt [rev. 25]2010-09-02T00:00:25-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181937New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-25.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-24.txt [rev. 24]2010-08-26T00:00:24-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181936New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-24.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-23.txt [rev. 23]2010-08-05T00:00:23-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181935New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-23.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-22.txt [rev. 22]2010-08-04T00:00:22-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181934New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-22.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-21.txt [rev. 21]2010-06-02T00:00:21-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181933New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-21.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-20.txt [rev. 20]2010-04-15T00:00:20-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181932New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-20.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-19.txt [rev. 19]2009-09-02T00:00:19-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181931New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-19.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-18.txt [rev. 18]2009-07-10T00:00:18-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181930New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-18.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-17.txt [rev. 17]2009-05-06T00:00:17-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181929New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-17.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-16.txt [rev. 16]2009-03-06T00:00:16-08:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181928New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-16.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-15.txt [rev. 15]2008-12-11T00:00:15-08:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181927New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-15.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-14.txt [rev. 14]2008-11-24T00:00:14-08:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181926New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-14.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-13.txt [rev. 13]2008-11-02T00:00:13-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181925New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-13.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-12.txt [rev. 12]2008-09-08T00:00:12-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181924New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-12.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-11.txt [rev. 11]2008-07-09T00:00:11-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181923New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-11.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-10.txt [rev. 10]2008-01-22T00:00:10-08:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181922New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-10.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-09.txt [rev. 09]2007-11-16T00:00:09-08:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181921New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-09.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-08.txt [rev. 08]2007-10-04T00:00:08-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181920New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-08.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-07.txt [rev. 07]2007-09-10T00:00:07-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181919New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-07.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-06.txt [rev. 06]2007-08-22T00:00:06-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181918New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-06.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-05.txt [rev. 05]2007-07-08T00:00:05-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181917New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-05.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-04.txt [rev. 04]2007-06-05T00:00:04-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181916New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-04.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-03.txt [rev. 03]2007-04-02T00:00:03-07:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181915New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-03.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-02.txt [rev. 02]2007-03-05T00:00:02-08:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181914New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-02.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-01.txt [rev. 01]2007-01-31T00:00:01-08:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181913New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-01.txt</b>[ (System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-00.txt [rev. 00]2006-12-12T00:00:00-08:00 (System)http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6733/history/#history-181912New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-00.txt</b>