Saturday, December 28, 2013

That I started with a goodwill greeting associated with
the Christmas occasion doesn’t make me a church devotee of which I definitely
am not. I have departed a long time ago yet from Catholic Church, my childhood
church, though I am still sympathetic to some of its key doctrines of faith
notably Vatican II.

On the other hand, not being a church devotee doesn’t make
me any less a disciple of Jesus the Christed One. I am very much a disciple of
Jesus and his team-mates of Ascended Beings, and I’d categorically declare that
I am, in this respect, a Christian. It is for this reason that I do attune
myself to the rituals of the Christians who are largely fanatical devotees of
the Cult of Jesus which was officially dubbed as Christian Church in the
generic sense.

So many fallacies and lies were propagated by the Jesusian
cults (i.e. churches) over the past two (2) millennia, one of which is the
contention that Jesus was born on the night of 24th of December.
Nobody knows about the exact date when Jesus, the World Teacher, embodied and
was born as an infant a full Age ago (1 Age = 2,150 years approximately). There
are mystics today who claim that Jesus was born around the end of March, but as
to the exact day of his birth (using the Gregorian calendar) no mystic had made
a precise claim.

In the first place, the devotional practice of giving so
much importance to the exact day of birth of a founding Master in its literal
sense is purely this: blind fanaticism. Even if we presume that Jesus was born
on the 24th of December, there is a greater underlying meaning
behind his birth that the ordinary devotees and cult hierarchs have no
knowledge about. But if only the cult devotees would look to numerology for
some answers regarding the question of meaning, they would find fruitful
answers via this method.

But as everybody realizes, Jesusians are bent on declaring
that any contention that lies outside the church/cult dogmas is a work of the
Devil. You could just imagine how many freethinkers and esoteric seekers may
have been labeled with the ad hominem
Devil by the Jesusian cultists (church goers), and it is no surprise that this
writer had earned the ire of many such fanatical cultists such as his former
university students. Well, the bad luck for the fanatics is that this is no
Medieval Period, and so I could make the boldest claims to unmasking church
lies without being accosted or burned at stake by fanatics. Also, I reside
inside the University of the Philippines
(Diliman) which is the ultimate bastion of freedom in the whole of Southeast Asia. My big city, Manila, is also the citadel
of freedom in Asia, so no one would stone me to death or burn me alive anywhere
here for being an iconoclast.

Now, let me go straight to the question of meaning. This
interpretive task is a matter of deep exegesis, likened to interpreting a
dream. As one who had studied semiotics (science of signs) via the behavioral
sciences and esoteric philosophy, the task is easy just the same. Humans
normally resort to rituals or ceremonies, and often the cycles of seasons and
weather patterns evoke ideas that then translate into ritualizing engagements.
Social relations produce thought, as the sociology of knowledge (cognitive
sociology) had so succinctly declared as a social law. This is our starting
point for our recondite reflection.

In the ancient past, the production of rituals was the
chief task of the Shaman (babaylan in ancient Philippines). The shaman was the
priest (or priestess), medicine man (or woman) or healer, white
magician/alchemist (taps energies for beneficial purposes), mystic (bridge to
the Divine Beings), and philosopher, all rolled into a single functionary. It
is important to cite the shaman here, as we can best understand the
significance of the ‘December 24 event’ by putting ourselves in the position of
the Roman high priests (Rome’s own equivalent of shamans) and see what this
intersubjective process can reveal to us.

Remember that the Roman shamans were, in ancient parlance,
pagans. In today’s anthropological language, they were animists. As such, they
represented a people that was so close to nature, and knew well the cycles of
seasons. Like the shamans from other cultures, they had designed rituals for
every kind of human activity conceivable. A child, before being born, is prayed
for using mantrams and ceremonial rites, and then receives another ritual upon
birth, and another ritual upon reaching puberty, and so on till death. Likewise
did the seasons of both hemispheres receive equal treatment in terms of
ritualization. Ditto to the cycles of pre-cultivation, cultivation, and
post-harvest for food production (agriculture, horticulture). The Romans were
into such practices, to emphatically mark our point here, more so that they
were already city-builders and were of advanced caliber in knowledge and
technological pursuits of their time; their shamans, likewise of the highest
caliber.

Culled from above is the idea of ritualizing for the end
of the autumn season and the beginning of the winter season in the Northern
hemisphere. The significance of Christmas, of Jesus’ birth being assigned to
the 24th of December, has a great deal to do with the
autumn-to-winter interface (to use current terminology). Officially, the
equalization of the patterns of autumn and winter is cognized as the Winter
solstice, which falls on the 21st of December in the North (winter
solstice in the south falls on the 21st of June, which is summer
solstice in the North).

Even before Christianity was declared an official
religion, without doubt the Romans were already in the habit of ritualizing the
coming of Winter. No further research is needed to establish this. All of the
ethnic communities in the Mediterranean for
that matter held rituals signifying the start of Winter, and the
inter-permeation of cultural elements by dint of cultural diffusion is
responsible for the degree of homogenization of Winter ritual patterns in the
same area. Which means that the Latins (Romans), Etruscans, Greeks, Hamites,
Semites, Phoenicians, Carthaginians, and Iberians shared more or less similar
traits in their Winter rituals, the most focal being that they all celebrated
Winter solstice in certain ways.

The question now is, what is the deeper significance of
December the 24th other than that it marks the 3rd day
after the Winter solstice? And why the 3rd day after the solstice
was declared as the ‘birth of Jesus’ by the new rising religion, the Cult of
Jesus (Christianity)? Why not simply assign the 21st of December as
the day of his birth, which will make the birthday identical to the 1st
day of winter (the 21st)?

As to the date, the 3rd day after the solstice,
a note: 3 is the number of Trinity (Father, Son, Spirit) in Christology. In
numerology (Indian and Pythagorean systems), 3 denotes creativity,
productivity, motion, action, activity. The two semiotic sets do converge.
Instead of copying the solstice day as D’ Day, the ancient shamans (who were
the new bishops and priests of the Jesusian cult) decided that it would be more
appropriate to indicate the Trinitarian power in the date, which makes the 24th
rather than the 21st as the top candidate. For a numerologist, the
day makes sense, in that declaring a creative-dynamic signification on a
winter’s season, which is a season of rest or motionlessness, generates a sense
of balance of the action-rest duality (yin-yang in the East).

Not only that. It would also make greater sense for the
devotees or blind fanatics (a redundancy really, because devotee and fanatic
are identical) if the date of birth would be on a day other than the 21st
which most Mediterraneans and Northerners already celebrate. The ‘uniqueness
criterion’ is an important element in decision-making, and by using this
criterion means that the 24th of December made the Jesusians or
Jesuits (church fanatics) a unique people who created rituals outside of the
common ritual templates. That is, the 24th of December rendered the
fanatics the illusion of uniqueness, which made them rest on solid
psychological grounds: they need not defend any longer that they were copy-cat
folks.

Now, that leads us to the next idea: converging the
‘uniqueness’ element with the ‘chosen people’ eschatological belief present in
all religions and cultures. Supposedly, Jesus was the harbinger of the new idea
that the ‘gentiles’ (literally the ‘outsiders’ of a chosen people who were the
Jews) were themselves a ‘chosen people’ and not outsiders or outcaste. The
Jesusian cult has now given the fanatics not only a sense of uniqueness, but
also declared that such a uniqueness reclined in their being the ‘chosen ones’.
The time for the old chosen ones has ended, and a new chosen one has begun in
mandate.

You could just imagine the ecstatic impact that such a
convergence of ideas could produce among the erstwhile herds of fanatics, who
for many centuries were loathsome outsiders in the civilizational game. They
were the barbarians & savages of the previous ages, the outsiders who were
recognized best for their destructive propensities. Now they are the
co-creators or co-producers of the Divine Spheres or God (co-creation signified
by number 3), the next harbingers of civilization. And true indeed, the former
barbarians, who were mainly Europeans, felt this mission so strongly in their
psyche that for many centuries thereafter they scoured the earth for ‘heathens’
who would be converts to their idea of civility, of being cultured,
progressive, rational, and humanist.

Of course, the psychological mood or theme evoked by the
entire ritualizing of birth in the 24th is Hope: that Jesus was the
embodiment of hope, that there was finally hope for the Europeans who for
centuries were heathen slaves. Of course, it was the greatest psychological
victory for the Latins (Romans & sister tribes) in as much as they were
then the center of civilization world-wide. The 24th also gave the
same Europeans the same sense of hope at a time of hopelessness and despair
that were evoked by the cyclical winter season.

Cultivating the seed of creativity, activity, uniqueness
and hope, all converging within a common seed-idea—the birthing of the Ascended
Master Jesus and bestowing him with the role of Begotten Son of the Father
God—and planting this in the psyche of Europeans is among the most profound
developments in the genetic seeding and improvement of the Europeans themselves.
True indeed, and humanity better accept this, no matter how destructive may
have been the methods employed by European powers in their conquests, the Torch
of Civility for the entire Piscean Age was vested in the European. Their time
had come 2000+ years ago, and no force on Earth could stop that.

2000+ years ago, the seed of that historic mission of the
Europeans was planted, concocted, congealed in thought, which then permeated
right deep into their Collective Unconscious, which eventually got implanted in
their genes. For the Collective Unconscious, which belongs to the
Electromagnetic Field or EMF, interfaces directly with the biophysical, and
that to induce changes in the EMF will likewise result to corresponding changes
in the bio-physical dimension. The changes, in other words, will be planted as
genetic traits that will govern the actions of the people concerned in the long
run.

That, dearest readers, is the significance of the (night
of) 24th of December. The mission of the Europeans has now been
optimized, after the full Age of Pisces. Likewise the mission of Jesus: to
carry on his shoulders for 2000+ years the collective karma of Earth’s
humanity. The European-Jesusian missions are now over, and the Torch is now
being passed on to the peoples of the East, particularly to the Pacific Asians.
But this new development, which will be the definitive development of the Age
of Aquarius, is another thing. Suffice me at this moment to say: I’ve shared my
thoughts about the deep significance of the 24th of December, by
resorting to an archeology of the psyche and soul.

A Merry Christmas again to you all! May my love for all
Jesusian cultists be re-declared here, please accept my goodwill for you all.
May you all evolve in spirit! Let’s all chant the mantram: Jesus is Love! Jesus
is Love! Jesus is Love!

The second
class of tales relates more directly to the origin of human beings. Myths of
this type are apparently confined to the series of tribes just mentioned as
having legends of the first category, but in this instance the area seems to
extend as far as Tasmania.
As an illustration we may take the version given by the Arunta. At the time of
the retreat of the original sea to the northward there were in the western sky
two beings who were self-existing and of whose origin nothing is stated. From
their lofty position they saw far to the east a number of Inapertwa,
"rudimentary human beings or in-complete men, whom it was their mission to
make into men and women." These Inapertwa were of various shapes and lived
along the edges of the sea. "They had no distinct limbs or organs of
sight, hearing or smell, and did not eat food, and presented the appearance of
human beings all doubled up into a rounded mass in which just the outline of
the different parts of the body could be vaguely seen." The two sky-beings
came down, therefore, from the sky and armed with large stone knives, set to
work to make these amorphous objects into men. "First of all the arms were
released, then the fingers were added by making four clefts at the end of each
arm; then legs and toes were added in the same way. The figure could now stand,
and after this the nose was added and the nostrils bored with the fingers. A
cut with the knife made the mouth. . . . A slit on each side separated the
upper and lower eyelids, hidden behind which the eyes were already present,
another stroke or two completed the body and thus, out of the Inapertwa, men
and women were formed." Closely similar tales are told by many other
tribes of the central area 9 and the south-east, as well as in Tasmania.'"

REFLECTION

‘At the time of the
retreat of the original sea’ is a direct referent for the geological changes in
antiquity, past 100 millions of years back. That was the eon of the first
experimentation on Terran humans, which involved the ‘lunar pitris’ (lunar
fathers) as revealed by ancient wisdom, a revelation that forms a part of Theos
Sophia or divine wisdom.

The said beings
volunteered to come to Earth back then, to check on the conditions of life
support systems and nature’s evolutes. The evolutes they could have seen was
man-like primates that antedated all of today’s primates. Suffice it to state
that such primates could have been the copy models for embodying group-soul
humans that were on the descending phase of their development in the
evolutionary arc.

Two (2) beings could very
well signify two (2) teams of ‘pitris’ of creator fathers—‘lunar pitris’ and
‘solar pitris’—who came forth in antiquity, during the galvanization of a new
super-continents. The first supercontinent where mankind appeared is what
geologists of today call Pangaea or Land
of Pan, which mystical circles call
Hyperborea and Thule.
The other supercontinent, Lemuria, superseded Pangaea.

So graphical is the
experimentation on the Pangean evolutes that they practically resemble a
laboratory process that involves incision instruments (‘knife’) and grafting of
different body parts surgically stitched or glued together. Such a creation of
Terrans could have moved on till the Lemurian sub-races, when mankind began to
appear in a more physical form than the previous etheric or ‘shadowy’ Pangeans.

It could have been so
difficult a process altogether, as some of the experimental humans turned out
to be lifeless vegetables. Needless to say, their soul imprints were erased by
their creators, so that new souls can be used to embody other experimental
forms. These experimentations went on up until the more recent races, with ‘pitris’
from higher dimension worlds landing a
hand in the genetic breeding.

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

In general the myths of these beings seem to be independent in origin
and unrelated, and are mainly concerned with recounting the way in which they
taught certain ceremonies and customs to the people with whom they came in
contact in their wanderings; so that they present few details of value for our
purposes. Differing in some respects from these myths, yet on the whole
belonging to this class, is the account given by one of the tribes from
Victoria,' according to whom the first man originated from the gum of the
wattle-tree, and issuing from a knot upon its trunk, entered into the body of a
woman and was born as a male child.

REFLECTION

The
aborigines of Australia
are remnants of the 3rd root-race of Lemurians. It is a sad fact
that the Australians are bereft in mythology as a whole, as found out by
researchers on the subject. Yet there are still discernible themes and lores.

Accordingly,
the ‘first man’—referent for the first racial families or sub-races—originated
from the ‘gum of a wattle-tree’. Whatever the tree may be as archetype, it is
the ‘gum’ that matters. The ‘gum’ is form and shape-wise like unto the ‘sweat’,
and you can easily see this when you observe gum fluids squeezing themselves
out of any plant that emits them.

The
‘sweat-born’ early humans are being revealed here. Prior to the sexually
produced mid-Lemurians, couples of sub-races of primordial humans were of
‘sweat-born’ and ‘egg-born’ humanoids.

‘Issuing
from a knot upon its trunk’ is quite a shady memory of ancient knowledge of
genetics, where chromosomes spiraled in shape and seemingly knotted in
micro-sections. The man coming from the genetic essence seems, and born not by
sexual reproduction but seemingly born by itself, is an indirect evidence of
genetic programmers who bred early humans as genetic experiments indeed.

Theos
Sophia or divine wisdom is replete with explications on the role of the ‘solar
pitris’ (solar fathers) who aided in bringing forth the humans of antiquity who
would gradually look like the Adam Kadmon imprint of human over-souls at the
start of the present Manvantara.

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

OLOFAT, LUKE-LANG: MICRONESIAN MYTH IN CAROLINES

Erle Frayne D. Argonza

Among
the indigenous groups in the Pacific
Islands come the
Micronesian tales, such as this one from the Carolines. The lore speaks of the
highest deity Luke-lang and exploits of one of his sons Olifat.

Such a
myth has equivalents in the West notably the narrative of Odin and his son
Thor. What is curiously revealed in the Carolines myth is the theme of
‘destruction of man’ that is inextricably intertwined with the history of the
planet and with anthropogenesis.

The
Micronesians could be remnants of the 3rd root race of Lemurians who
were already largely de-programmed in antiquity, as two (2) other
root-races—Atlanteans, Aryans—would precede them. Yet remnants indeed survive,
and among their tales are bits and pieces of cosmogenesis, anthropogenesis, and
geological changes.

Interestingly,
the internecine conflicts among ancient ethnicities and races are also depicted
in the myth. Such conflicts are signs that the law of polarity was operating
more strongly among the mid-Lemurians (beginning of sexual human reproduction,
twinflame mates) who were traced as the earliest humans in this tale.

[Philippines, 30 June 2011]

Micronesia
Mythology - Miscellaneous Tales

ONE of the most important myths or series of myths in the Carolines,
outside of the more strictly cosmogonic tales, is that describing the exploits
of Olofat or Olifat, the eldest son of Luke-lang, the highest deity. In the
version from the central Carolines, which is here followed,' he appears as a
mischievous, almost malicious, person who stands in marked contrast to his
brother or brothers, who are beneficent; and it is interesting to compare this
antithesis of malice and goodness with Melanesian types.

Olofat saw that one of his brothers was better than he and also more
beautiful, and at this he became angry. Looking down from the sky-world and seeing
two boys who had caught a couple of sharks, with which they were playing in a
fish-pond, he descended to earth and gave the sharks teeth, so that they bit
the hands of the children. When the boys ran home crying with pain and told
their troubles to their mother, Ligoapup, who was the sister of Olofat, she
asked them if they had not seen any one about, whereupon they said that they
had, and that he was more handsome than any man whom they had ever beheld.
Knowing that this must be her brother, Olofat, Ligoapup asked her sons where he
was, and they answered, "Close by the sea." She then told them to go
and get the man and bring him to her, but when they reached the place where
they had left him, they found only an old, grey-haired man, covered with dirt.
Returning to their mother, they informed her that the man whom they had seen
was no longer there; but she bade them go back and bring whomsoever they might
find. Accordingly they set off, but this time they saw only a heap of filth in
place of a man; and so once more they went home to their mother, who told them
to return a third time. Obeying her, they questioned the filth, saying,
"Are you Olofat? For if you are, you must come to our mother";
whereupon the pile of filth turned into a handsome man who accompanied them to
Ligoapup. She said to him, "Why are you such a deceiver?" And Olofat
replied, "How so?" And she _said, "First, you turned yourself
into a dirty old man, and then into a pile of filth." "I am afraid of
my father," answered Olofat. "Yes," said Ligoapup, "you are
afraid because you gave teeth to the shark." Then Olofat replied, "I
am angry at Luk, for he created my brother handsomer than I am, and with
greater power. I shall give teeth to all sharks, in order that they may eat men
whenever canoes tip over." When Luk, who was in the sky-world, became
aware of these things, he said to his wife, "It would be well if Olofat
came back to heaven, since he is only doing evil on earth"; and his wife,
Inoaeman, said, "I think so, too. Otherwise he will destroy mankind, for
he is an evil being."

Accordingly Luk ordered the people of the sky-world to build a great
house, and when it was finished, he not only commanded that a feast be
announced, but also had a large fish-basket prepared, in which they placed
Olofat and sank him in the sea. After five nights, when they thought he would
be dead, two men went in a canoe and hauled up the basket; but behold! it
contained only a multitude of great fish, for Olofat had slipped away and
seated himself in a canoe near by. The men asked him, "Who are you?"
And he replied, "I am Olofat. Come here, and I will help you to put the
fish into your boat." Taking one fish after the other, he handed them to
the men, but in so doing he removed all the flesh of the fish and gave the men
merely the empty skins. For himself he kept nothing but the smallest ones; and
when the people said, "Why is it that you take only the little fish?"
Olofat replied,

"Give Luk all the big ones; I am quite satisfied with the little
ones." Then the people brought the catch to Luk, who asked them,
"Where is the fish-basket? Who took the fish out?" When they replied,
"Olofat did that, but has again placed the basket in the sea," Luk
said, "Has he then taken no fish for himself?" to which they answered,
"Only the very smallest ones." Luk now ordered all sorts of food to
be prepared for the feast and commanded that the fishes should be cooked; and
when all were gathered in the house, while Olofat sat at the entrance, Luk
said, "Let every one now eat. Let the food be divided, and let each
receive his share." Nevertheless, Olofat refused to receive any; and when
the guests took up the fish, lo! there were only the empty skins, and within
was nothing, so that they had to content themselves with fruit.

Olofat, however, ate his own fish; but Luk said, "See, we have
nothing, whereas Olofat is able to eat his own fish, and is still not finished
with them." Thereupon he became very angry and sent word to Thunder to
destroy Olofat; but since Thunder lived in a house at a distance, Luk said,
"Take Thunder some food." So one of the gods took some of the viands
in order to carry them, but Olofat, snatching them from him, himself carried
.them to Thunder; and on arriving at the house, he called out, "O Thunder,
I bring food." Now Thunder had found a white hen, and coming out, he
thundered; but though Luk cried, "Kill him," and though Thunder
blazed, Olofat merely placed his hand before his eyes. Nevertheless, Thunder
followed him and thundered again and again behind him; but from under his
mantle Olofat took some coco-nut milk which he had brought with him, and
sprinkling it upon Thunder, he quenched the lightning. After this he seized
Thunder and bore him back to his own home; and when Olofat had returned to the
feast house, Luk said, "Why has the man not been killed?"
Notwithstanding this, Olofat again took his place by the door, while Luk now
ordered another of the gods to take food to Anulap. Thereupon Olofat stood up
and walked along behind the one who carried the food and he took the viands
away from him, saying, "I myself will take the food to Anulap." So he
went to the god and said, "Here are viands for you"; and then he
turned about and came back to the great assembly house, whereupon Luk said to
Anulap, "Why have you not killed the man?" Then Anulap took his great
hook, which was fastened to a strong rope, and throwing it at Olofat, he caught
him around the neck; but Olofat quickly seized a mussel-shell and cut the rope,
after which he hastened to the house of Anulap, where he sat down upon the
threshold. When Anulap saw him, he seized his club to strike Olofat; but as he
stretched it out, the latter changed himself into a wooden mortar. Thereupon
Anulap called, "Where is Olofat?" and his wife, answering, "He
must have run away," they lay down and slept. After all this Luk said,
"We can do nothing with Olofat; I believe he cannot die. Go, O Laitian,
and tell the people to come in the morning to make a porch for the house."
When the people had come and asked how they should construct the porch, Luk
said, "Go to the forest and bring great tree-trunks"; and when this
was done, and the tree-trunks were laid by the house, Luk commanded, "Now,
go and fetch Olofat." Olofat came and said, "I shall go, too";
but Luk replied, "You must aid us to build the porch. You must make three
holes in the ground, two shallow and one deep; and in these the tree-trunks
must be set." Accordingly Olofat dug three holes, but in each of them he
made an excavation at one side; after which Luk asked, "Olofat, are you
ready yet?" Thereupon Olofat, taking a nut and a stone, secreted them in
his girdle; and Luk said, "Now set the tree-trunks in the holes." In
obedience to this, three men seized the upper end, while Olofat grasped the
lower part; and they pushed Olofat so that he fell into the hole, only to creep
quickly into the space which he had made on the side. Not knowing this,
however, they then raised the tree-trunk high, and dropping it into the hole,
they made it firm with earth and stone.

All now believed that Olofat had been caught under the great post and
had been crushed to death. He, however, sat in his hole on the side, and being
hungry five nights later, he cracked the nut with the stone which he had
brought with him and ate it; whereupon ants came, and taking the fragments
which had fallen to the ground, they carried the food along the trunk to the
surface, going in long rows. The man who sat in the house above, seeing this,
said to his wife, "Olofat is dead, for the ants are bringing up parts of
his body"; but when Olofat heard the speech of the man, he turned,
him-self into an ant and crept with the others up the post.' Having climbed
high, he allowed himself to drop upon the body of the man, who pushed the ant
off, so that it fell to the ground, where it was immediately changed into
Olofat. As soon as the people saw him, they sprang up in fear, and Olofat said,
"What are you talking about?" When Luk beheld him, he said, "We
have tried in every possible way to kill you, but it seems that you cannot die.
Bring me Samenkoaner." After Samenkoaner had come and sat down, Luk asked
him, "How is it that Olofat cannot die? Can you kill him?" To this
Samenkoaner replied, "No, not even if I thought about it for a whole night
long, could I find a means; for he is older than I." Thereupon Luk said,
"But I do not wish that he should destroy all men upon the earth";
and so the Rat, Luk's sister, advised that they should burn Olofat. Accordingly
they made a great fire, to which they brought Olofat; but he had with him a
roll of coco-nut fibre, and when Luk ordered them to throw him into the flames,
he crept through the roll and came out safely upon the other side of the fire.
Then Luk said, "Rat, we have tried everything to kill him, but in vain";
and the Rat answered, "He cannot die; so make him the lord of all who are
evil and deceitful."

About Me

Fraternal Greetings! I'm a sociologist, economist, development worker, life coach, poet, musical artist, and powerlifter... I've authored voluminous academic articles, technical papers, wisdom & life coaching articles, and four (4) books to date... I obtained my university degrees from the Philippines' top schools, the University of the Philippines (BA & MA sociology) and De La Salle University (MA Development Studies). I belong to the upper 0.5% aptitude-wise (IQ past 150), and had demonstrated this gifted capacity through various innovations on social technologies and theoretical discourses with originality and depth. I look forward to engaging exchanges with you. Carpe Diem!
Please contact me thru: efdargon@gmail.com

Welcome to Ascension, Cosmic Awareness, Oneness!

Hi Friend! It's truly a gracious moment that you passed by.
This site projects messages of oneness and cosmic awareness. Certain practical tools will be shared along the way, if you care to follow them you may experience ascension to the next dimension of your spiritual journey.
Enjoy your excursion here. Mabuhay!