Abandoning Human Rights in Egypt Will Not Produce Stability

Share

Share

Tweet

Post

Email

In Congressional testimony yesterday, Secretary of State Kerry was challenged on administration efforts to abandon human rights in Egypt. As the law reads today, the administration must withhold a certain amount of U.S. aid to Egypt unless it can certify human rights progress, and even the withheld amount can be granted with a “national security waiver,” but the administration wants all connections between human rights and our aid program severed.

Why? Kerry explained that there is a real threat of terrorism and extremism in Egypt. Here is how the Atlantic Council summarized his comments:

Secretary of State John Kerry acknowledged a deterioration in Egyptian freedoms in testimony to the House Foreign Affairs Committee Thursday, but defended the administration’s decision to waive human rights conditions on aid to the country. He pointed to Egypt’s strategic importance to the United States, the competition among global players for influence in Cairo, and the difficult security environment there. “There is a major challenge of extremism, bombs that have been going off in Cairo, bombs that have gone off in Sharm al-Sheikh, different challenges.” On Wednesday, he told the Senate Appropriations Committee, “We have to try to work and thread a needle carefully that can balance the various interests that exist.”

This is interesting because it is exactly wrong. There is indeed a terrible threat of extremism and terrorism in Egypt, but Mr. Kerry appears to believe that regime repression is the way to fight it. Kerry acknowledged in his testimony that “We have seen a deterioration over the course of these last months with the arrests of journalists and some civil society personalities.” Does he believe that arresting journalists and “civil society personalities” fights extremism? Does jailing poets and bloggers stop terrorists?

In fact the regime is flailing at every critic because it is failing in the struggle against terrorism and extremism–or indeed is feeding them. Those who said we must ignore human rights violations by the Mubarak regime argued that we should overlook its repression in the name of stability. Then one day, Mubarak was gone in a flash. So much for stability through repression. This regime is considerably more repressive than that of Mubarak, but similarly provides no answers to Egyptians who would like to see their nation change and progress. Mr. Sisi’s Gulf benefactors are becoming tired of excuses offered in place of real economic reform.

Mr. Kerry presumably thinks he is helping Egypt, and Egyptians, with this “terrorism vs. stability” argument. But looking at the growth of disorder and terrorism in the Sinai and the Western Desert, and looking at the situation in the Egyptian heartland, it should be evident that Egypt’s problems will be addressed through jobs and factories and schools, and freedom–not solved in its jails. In fact, the miserable conditions in those jails, the torture and abuse, and the mixing of jihadis and Muslim Brothers and students and journalists, is a perfect formula for spreading extremism.

Everything is relative. As I was preparing to fly to Romania in the mid 1990s I expressed some concern about safety to my eldest son who replied, “Dad, after you leave Los Angeles, everything in the world is relatively safe. In recent times the greatest threat to human rights in Egypt (and all other aspects of civilization) was Obama and his efforts to have the Muslim Brotherhood take over. Everything else would fall to the normal level of Middle East risk where Islam represents the majority.

Posted by OmerliFebruary 27, 2016 at 3:33 am

From principled anti-war protester with three Purple Hearts to nothing more than a fig leaf for the likes Sisi and Putin. Resign Mr. Kerry, you’ve become an embarrassment to a generation that remembers.

Posted by JK RadwanFebruary 27, 2016 at 4:36 am

Written clearly by somebody who is not on the ground in Egypt. Look at the neighborhood, would you like Egypt to become another Syria or Libya? Shall we add Egyptians to the mix in the refugee crisis?
Yes we Egyptians want to see progress, but we are also acutely aware there is an element in Egypt who does not want to see it, those who plant bombs do not want to see progress. When the Muslim Brotherhood can hire people for less than $60 to blow up the Damietta-Port Said pipeline how should Egypt respond? Hold hands and sing Kumbaya while the country is destroyed in the name of democracy?
This country is in the process of fixing decades of neglect in the middle of a very hostile neighborhood. There are no easy answers. Shall we hand Egypt over to ISIS and see their brand of democracy?

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

New Independent Task Force Reports

India now matters to U.S. interests in virtually every dimension. This Independent Task Force report assesses the current situation in India and the U.S.-India relationship, and suggests a new model for partnership with a rising India.

Rates of heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and other noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) in low- and middle-income countries are increasing faster than in wealthier countries. The report outlines a plan for collective action on this growing epidemic.

The authors argue that the United States has responded inadequately to the rise of Chinese power and recommend placing less strategic emphasis on the goal of integrating China into the international system and more on balancing China's rise.

Campbell evaluates the implications of the Boko Haram insurgency and recommends that the United States support Nigerian efforts to address the drivers of Boko Haram, such as poverty and corruption, and to foster stronger ties with Nigerian civil society.