‘REGION-BUILDING’

From “Strengthening economic relations between Australia and New Zealand” ( Joint study of Australia and New Zealand productivity commissions )

By Alex Newman, The New American, Nov 5, 2018 – The Deep State’s globalist plan for what insiders refer to as the “New World Order” — basically, a global government controlled by themselves — begins with submerging the sovereignty of nation-states into regional “orders.” These are better understood as regional governments built using “free trade” deals as the foundation, with the European Union serving as the premier example. How do we know this is the plan? Because top Deep State globalists have said so publicly and repeatedly, and because that is the exact strategy being pursued openly….

EU GLOBAL POLICY ‘BASED MAINLY’ ON SUPPORTING, ENCOURAGING DEVELOPMENT OF OTHER REGIONAL BLOCS

EU’s Mogherini: EU can pivot global network of regional blocs to build New Global Order

‘In this world, walls are made to be torn down’

“Our cooperation with our friends and partners around the world is based mainly on this: in trying to support and encourage regional integration and partnerships. That is true in the Arab world and the Middle East, that is true for Africa with the African Union…it is true in Asia with the ASEAN, or in Latin America with CELAC. The European Union can pivot a global network of regional alliances. A New Global Order can benefit immensely from improved regional cooperation, in terms of security and in terms of narrative, on building this multilateral New Global Order.”
Federica Mogherini, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Vice President of the European Commission

Post-Brexit, the EU doubles down, vows to support, ‘invest in regional orders’ and ‘regional governance’ for North America, South America, the Middle East, Africa, and other regional blocsBy Tim Porter
Surely, Europa is riding this beast. As if the abundant corroborating evidence compiled over decades of globalist “region-building” schemes were not enough to convince the American public of this threat to national sovereignty, along comes the European Union to give a rare, official confirmation of its intent.And as President-elect Donald Trump prepares to protect America’s borders and national security, he will have to guard against a collusion of Washington and EU elitists bent on subverting his efforts. The European Union Global Strategy document was officially released on June 28, just five days after the June 23 Brexit vote to leave the EU was passed by the British population.

‘Free flow of goods, services, and people’ would include access for educationBy Tim Porter
A concept that today is commonly referred to as “free trade” has become a key component of this age-old utopian delusion. Many advocates of this concept have bought into the deception that its “free flow of goods, services and people” implies a minimizing of government regulation upon the flow of commerce across national borders, but just the opposite is true.

Colleges, universities promote regional, global ‘citizenship’By Tim Porter
As it has for decades, the media establishment’s recent fake news about fake news has contained assertions that any accounts of a developing “New World Order” are part of a crazy, xenophobic “conspiracy theory.” Media pundits perpetuate this myth even though graduates entering their profession from numerous universities increasingly have–or have rubbed shoulders with those who have–completed coursework in a curriculum called “global studies.”
“Global studies” is today’s euphemistic successor to “world order studies” that began to spring up in colleges, universities and even high schools in the 1960s and early ’70s.
Many of these utopian-minded globalists would not consider themselves or their objectives to be inherently evil, but theirs is a problem of perception–not only of themselves, but of the entire human race.

By Tim Porter
Brexit, the British exit from the European Union, is a major breakthrough for the independence of nations. Freedom lovers all over the world have been hoping for such a watershed event to encourage other national populations to reclaim their sovereignty and independence from globalist multilateralism. However, today’s Brits will have to be diligent to guard against the deception that is coming next….

‘The nation-state remains the true foundation of happiness and harmony’Denounces NAFTA, ‘international unions’ jeopardizing U.S. independence
The Hill, Arpil 27, 2016 – “We will no longer surrender this country or its people to the false song of globalism,” Trump promised during a speech in Washington.
“I am skeptical of international unions that tie us up and bring America down,” he claimed. “And under my administration, we will never enter America into any agreement that reduces our ability to control our own affairs. The nation-state remains the true foundation of happiness and harmony.” …. NAFTA, Trump said, “has been a total disaster for the United States and has emptied our states of our manufacturing and our jobs.”The list of “international unions” to which Trump refers includes more than just the more commonly known United Nations, World Trade Organization, and NATO, all of which have the United States as the chief sustaining member. It also includes the various continental, regional blocs, such as theEuropean Union, African Union, andEurasian Union. All of these organized blocs of nations are declared to be authorized and under the auspices of the UN, an organization largely underwritten by American taxpayers. Like NAFTA (consisting of North American Free Trade nations Canada, U.S. and Mexico), all of these blocs originated as economic trade blocs. However, officials from each have publicly declared the desire for their bloc to become a geopolitical jurisdiction, so that each bloc would integrate into a federal union of nations, using the EU’s incremental approach as the model.

Republicans, Democrats in congressional
‘Gang of Eight’ knew of operation

Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi

Breitbart, Nov 30, 2015 – The Obama administration pursued a policy in Libya back in 2011 that ultimately allowed guns to walk into the hands of jihadists linked to the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) and al-Qaeda (AQ) in Syria, according to a former CIA officer who co-authored a report on behalf of the Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi (CCB) detailing the gun running scheme.
In Congress, the then-bipartisan group known as the “Gang of Eight,” at a minimum, knew of the operation to aid and abet America’s jihadist enemies by providing them with material support. So says Clare Lopez, a former CIA officer and the primary author of CCB’s interim report, titled How America Switched Sides in the War on Terror, speaking with Breitbart News….The 2011 “Gang of Eight” mentioned in this report was comprised of a bipartisan group of lawmakers from both chambers.

National Review, Oct 22, 2015 – It was revealed in today’s Benghazi hearing that on the day he was killed, Ambassador Chris Stevens reported in a wire to the State Department that he had met with Wissam bin Hamid, a warlord with al-Qaeda connections. When Representative Mike Pompeo (R., Kan.) confronted Hillary Clinton with a picture of Bin Hamid and the head of the al-Qaeda’s Ansar al Sharia group, Mohammed al-Zawahari, Clinton said she had no knowledge such a meeting took place.

“Were you aware that our folks were either wittingly or unwittingly meeting on the ground with members of al-Qaeda hours before the attack?” Pompeo asked.
“I know nothing about this, congressman,” “I know nothing about this, congressman,” Clinton replied.A check of the transcript, and also with Rep. Pompeo’s Washington office, indicated that this short, two-minute exchange was the only time in Clinton’s eleven hours before the House Select Benghazi Committee that this smoking-gun revelation was mentioned. It was buried approximately two hours into the hearing. The revelation supports evidence gathered by the independentCitizens’ Commission on Benghazithat the U.S. and NATO were knowingly facilitating arms shipments to and from al-Qaeda affiliates in Libyaduring and after the revolution and deposing of Muammar Gaddafi, with the intention of forwarding those weapons to similar “freedom fighters” in Syria. For more information, see the video, Global Shakedown: ISIS, Ukraine and the New Cold War, embedded below.

As the ISIS hordes and other Islamist terrorist groups continue their bloodlust in the Middle East, the European Union’s ongoing tug-of-war with Putin’s Eurasian Union over Ukraine is being described as the start of a new Cold War.

Will this chaos continue to spread around the globe? Could there be a common method to all of this madness?

The world’s developing regional blocs, including the ASEAN (Assn of Southeast Asian Nations) Economic Community (AEC), and its model, the European Union (recall the “European Economic Community” of the ’60s), are shown in this map from this YouTube video produced in the Philippines. The video was produced by the Philippine ASEAN Business Advisory Council and SM Investments Corporation to promote the AEC to Philippine businesses.
This network of regional blocs is being developed without the general knowledge or consent of the world’s populations. The final alignment of these blocs’ member nations is uncertain, as several notable nations have not finalized plans to join any bloc. China may be its own “region,” although it has also made overtures to South Asia’s SAARC, to the chagrin of SAARC’s present anchor nation, India. However, both nations are members of the development fraternity, BRICS, along with Brazil, Russia, and South Africa, all of whom are anchor nations of their respective regional blocs.

Kissinger: world order [world government] will require ‘concept of order [regional government] within the various regions and to relate these regional orders to one another’By Alex NewmanThe New American
Sept 21, 2015
In Africa, owing to a lack of infrastructure and communications, unifying the entire continent all at once is simply not practical. So, globalist planners — both from the “West” and from the “East” — are making use of sub-regional governments that will eventually all be merged under the emerging single African regime….That, in essence, is what globalist forces eventually hope to do to the entire world. Once national governments worldwide finish surrendering their sovereignty to regional regimes — the EU, the AU, Vladimir Putin’s Eurasian Union, the Union of South American States (UNASUR or UNASUL), the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), the Middle-East Union, and more — all of the regional blocs will be subsumed under a single global authority.
None of this is a secret, and those involved in the agenda have openly boasted of their machinations. “The contemporary quest for world order [world government] will require a coherent strategy to establish a concept of order [regional government] within the various regions and to relate these regional orders [governments] to one another,” explained senior globalist Henry Kissinger in his latest book, World Order.

Why are Jeff Miller, others in Congress, Senate promoting the political federation of East Africa?Pushing Political Federation in Name of Economic ‘Free Trade’

On April 12, 2012 at the State House in Dar es Salaam, President Jakaya Mrisho Kikwete (centre) met with a delegation of five members of the United States’ Senate and House of Representatives serving in the Senate and House Armed Services Committees. The delegation led by Senator James Inhofe from Oklahoma (right front row). Others in the picture (from left to right) are Congressman Vernan Buchanan, Senator John Boozman, Congressman Jefferson Miller, U.S. Ambassador to Tanzania Alfonso E. Lenhardt and Congressman Steven Pearce.(Photo: U.S. Embassy, Dar es Salaam)

Hope Magazine (Rwanda) April 16, 2012,AllAfrica.comApril 15, 2012 – Senators and Representatives of the Congress from the United States of America… paid an official visit to the Secretary General for the East African Community, Dr Richard Sezibera, in Arusha…. The delegation led by Senator James Inhofe,…. also included Senator John Boozman (Arkansas), Congressman Jeff Miller…. Also in attendance was the EAC Deputy Secretary General in charge of Political Federation, Ms Beatrice Kiraso. In his remarks, Senator Inhofe praised the Secretary General for leading his troops in the integration process…. Senator Inhofe further noted that the USA was keeping tabs on the progress and developments at the EAC.EAC to draft constitution for political federationNew Vision (Uganda), Sept 12, 2013 – The East African Community (EAC) is to name a team to draft the Constitution for the regional political federation….[Ambassador] Hatega said Uganda, Kenya and Rwanda started on the process in June and were later joined by Burundi during the August Mombasa summit. He explained that the treaty that established the EAC stipulated four steps namely the customs union, common market, monetary union and the final stage of political
federation.How could these members of the U.S. Congress and Senate go to the East African Community to promote this “free flow of goods, services and people” across national borders — and actually meet with the EAC deputy secretary general in charge of facilitating the the political federation of those nations— and it not occur to them that this so-called free-trade “free flow” objective is the main cause for the derelict border policy on our own borders in the U.S.? The “free flow” mantra is an integral part of the so-called “free trade” agenda, and inevitably leads to integrated political jurisdictionas in the EAC.NAFTA tribunalsnow claim authority to overturn U.S. Supreme Court commerce decisions, and thus claim North American jurisdiction.

A joint study of the Australia and New Zealand productivity commissions, April 2012, Page 19….In reality, countries can adopt some elements from different levels of integration. Accordingly, bilateral and regional arrangements tend to be more complicated than suggested by figure 5. For example, current trans-Tasman arrangements embody elements of free trade and a common market.
In many respects Australia and New Zealand are good candidates for higher levels of integration due to: similarities in culture, institutions and values; geographic proximity; and a common language. Even so, there are also some potential downsides to high levels of integration. For example, some decisions may need to be taken above the national level and this can be regarded as unduly compromising national sovereignty. Australia and New Zealand are the principal nations in thePacific Islands Forum, and their bilateral integrationtoward a common currencywould become a springboard for greater regional integration. The above chart from the Australia-New Zealandjoint studyis the same path that all of the world’s major geopolitical regions have embarked upon toward regional governance. Currently,North Americais moving past level one (free trade), with intensive effort being made, through theBeyond the Borderagreement, theRegulatory Cooperation Counciland theNorth America Leaders Summit, to reach level three. According to a USG (U.S. government)document released by Wikileaks, attention will be focused upon level four (a common currency) once level three is in place.

By Tim Porter, Updated July 14, 2014
Members of Congress who talk about securing the U.S.-Mexico border, but all the while support “free trade,” are being totally dishonest. That’s because the “free flow of goods, services and people [labor]” across national borders within regional blocs is the very definition of their “free trade.” This “free trade” is not “free enterprise,” but “managed” trade, run by unelected, big gov/big business, (i.e., “fascist”) consortiums.
It is the goal of all major “free trade” blocs of nations on earth, building upon created regulatory institutions such as NAFTA tribunals, to become vast regional political jurisdictions like the European Union, with its “free flow of people” within a continental “Schengen Zone” perimeter.

THOUGH FINAL ALIGNMENT, BIBLE CORRELATIONS UNCLEAR, TEN GEOPOLITICAL REGIONS CLEARLY ARE TODAY'S REALITY By Tim Porter, March 15, 2012In the 1960s, a predominant view among Bible expositors was that when the European Common Market reached a total of ten western European nations, the time would be right for the fulfillment of the Bible's prophecies concerning the "ten kings."
Roughly fifty years later, and after the European Union has grown to 27 member nations, those Bible teachers' inadvertent lesson is clear: When it comes to interpreting current events with Bible prophecy, one must take care not to be too dogmatic. A larger, global scenario has now emerged. It is a scenario that sees Europe not as being comprised of "ten kingdoms," but sees Europe itself as being one of the ten, albeit the most prominent among them. Surely, Europa is riding this beast.

Is the Ukraine crisis the beginning of another cold war with Russia? "Kissinger: World Order and the New Cold War," a four-minute YouTube video, explains how Ukraine and similar crises will be used in the globalist drive toward a New World Order. It also indicates the real motives behind the current push for "amnesty," dereliction of border control policy and continual economic crises in the U.S.

By Tim Porter, July 15, 2013
The effect of these overlapping free trade agreements was further revealed by the globalist ambassador of Mexico to the U.S., Arturo Sarukhánin, in his remarks at the "NAFTA 20" anniversary conference in San Antonio last November: “I don’t think there’s the political willingness, at least in Canada and in the United States today to go down the route of deepening NAFTA. The beauty of TPP is that it allows us to do this through the back door. Why? Because by having Mexico, Canada, and the United States join the TPP negotiations, it will bring us up from the bootstraps....It modernizes NAFTA.... In many ways NAFTA was a 1.0 free trade agreement; TPP is a 3.0 free trade agreement."

‘MONNET METHOD’: TEMPLATE FOR WORLD ORDER OUT OF CHAOSBy Tim Porter, Dec 2, 2012
The latest economic crisis, a "fiscal cliff," looms for the U.S. economy in 2013, with consequences for the entire global financial system. Clearly, this fiscal cliff is the result of dereliction in Washington. But the real problem in Washington is that many of these politicians from both major political parties, along with their special-interest backers, are also collaborators in a Machiavellian, crisis-creating process patterned after Europe's “Monnet method.”

By Tim Porter, Dec. 26, 2011 - What exactly are the U.S. objectives in all of these military deployments? President Obama’s latest deployment announcements shed broader light upon this habitual misuse of our military.

As money-printing banksters and their derelict politicians deliberately tank the U.S. national economy, and products "Made in U.S.A." become more scarce, the "Made in North America" slogan will emerge as the only "solution" to restore economic confidence and compete with the rest of the world's regions.

BUY NORTH AMERICAN AND SAVE OURSELVES

By Robert Pastor, Globe and Mail (Canada), Feb. 11, 2012

“Buy North American” could be the mantra for helping the U.S. recognize the importance of both neighbours.... Thus, the best way to multiply our exports and accelerate growth would be to create a seamless market and construct a North American transportation and infrastructure grid.... The “North American idea” has to be big enough to inspire people in all three countries to forge a formidable region able to compete with a dynamic East Asia.

Swaminathan S A Aiyar, Times of India, Feb. 19, 2012 This thesis runs as follows…. "The crafty way forward is to force the pace of European integration faster than the public wants. This will, of course, lead to crises. But every crisis will force voters to choose between greater unification and the huge costs of de-integration. Hopefully they will repeatedly opt for greater unification. In the process, they will give up facet after facet of their national identity and culture…. "Our solution was Machiavellian…."

Despite the “situation ethics” cited for rebuilding Afghanistan and Iraq, a sizeable majority of Americans are generally opposed to the concept of “nation-building.” Surely, that is why the American public has not been plainly made aware that U.S. foreign intervention policy goes far deeper than mere nation-building. It is “region-building” – in Afghanistan, Africa and elsewhere – through the development of multilateral economic and security agreements that are designed to morph into geopolitical regional jurisdictions. At varying stages, all of these geopolitical regions, including North America, are pursuing the same “region-building” objectives [as documented in the attached review], including:

A Review of Thomas P.M. Barnett’s New York Times Bestseller, The Pentagon’s New Map (Berkley Publishing Group, 2004) By Tim Porter, June 2009Terrorism was the pretext to send American troops into the Middle East and Central Asia. According to Barnett, terrorism is not the real reason our troops are staying in the region. Despite Barack Obama’s campaign promises, troop deployments will continue to expand.

By David Bay, March 12, 2011

Once you understand this reality: that some countries and regions are lagging behind the rest of the world in being incorporated into the Global Economy and Government, and need to be boot-kicked into fully joining the world body, you will understand why we are now at war, and why we will keep on going to war, from the Middle East to the Korean Peninsula, to Indonesia, to Pakistan, to Cuba, to Somalia, Kenya, The Ivory Coast, Saudi Arabia, and to East Timor.

ALBERT PIKE: LUCIFERIAN -
Facing north, just three blocks from the U.S. Capitol Reflecting Pool in Washington, D.C., stands a statue of Albert Pike, the most revered Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite Freemasons in history.

By Tim Porter, Nov. 25, 2008 (Updated Sept. 5, 2011) Are you struggling to make sense of the increasing instability in America’s financial system, as well as on our nation’s borders? As with many mysteries, the best way to start figuring all this out is to “follow the money.” In this case, track the trend toward “regionalization.”