I think that jewish conspiracies are dynamic, not static from 3000 years ago onward (that would be preposterous). Instead, their ideas develop as they see new opportunities. I think the slave trade was more about profit, and mixing white people into oblivion (at least the modern version) probably was developed in the last 200 years or so.

That which existed in ages past, which you call 'racism,' was more of a common sense understanding of gross differences without all of the nifty scientific proof we have today of racial differences. Kind of like people staying away from excrement in past epochs, even though they hadn't the faintest ideas of what bacteria were.

Why did Congoids never have any written language prior to contact with Europeans and Arabs?.. Why did Congoids never advance out of the stone age on their own?.. Why did Congoids have little to no agriculture?.. Why are Congoid skulls closer to those of certain great apes...?

To determine what is natural, one simply needs to look at what exists in the absence of perturbing influences. 'White' people invent, naturally. The forcing together of the races was caused by influences that came from outside of Europe. The jews for instance, had a a huge role...

I believe that every race has the right to live in the condition <u>that it was in originally in</u>... american indians have a right to have their own separate, sovereign state(s) in North America. Congoids have the right to sovereign state(s) in sub-saharran Africa that are 'blacks' only. 'Whites' have the right to have Europe for themselves.&quot; [Emphasis added]

So you want me to provide sources that prove the jewish media conspiracy theory... how would one go about demonstrating this in a satisfactory manner if the powers-that-be did a good job covering most of their tracks in regard to their conspiracy? In that case, it would be true, but I could never 'formally' prove it. What then?

... I have heard... that many people in interracial relationships are fetishists. That is, many 'white' men want 'yellow' women becuase it is seen as exotic... It is the same thing for many 'white' women and 'black' men, and other combinations. This is of course their business, but only a fool could refer to cases such as these as 'genuine love.'

If they [his views] are so unsupported, why have I received all of these angry replies? Why be angry at someone for being wrong? Think about this for a moment. If I am wrong, I deserve pity and not hatred/disdain... The fact that I receive the latter is very telling indeed.