The impasse of self-existent structural elements and about the wave
phenomena

Attention! Translational errors
exist.

Are they particles the most
microscopic parts of things (for example an electron) like distinguishable and assembled quantities or are waves?

The
researchers have observed and confirmed in innumerable times the
phenomena, that are also caused in the two cases, at the motion
of particles and from the motion of waves. Many decades, the
physicists try to understand logically how it is possible in the
structure of matter, we meet microscopic " things" , that behave
as material objects of classic physics (bodies) and other times
as the waves. This surprise and their query, they express in
their each simplified book and in the occasion of some
publication. This " dualism " in the existence of microscopic
bodies, it constitutes one from the beloved subjects in each
simplified book of physics, with the black holes and expansion
of the free space. With enough dose of imagination and with
literary artifices, they succeed to attract more readers and good
sales in their books, usually leaving the queries unanswered and
without nor the minimal effort to they write some new thoughts, that
would help the research and creative thought.

This big query of
the physicists about the " divisive " in behavior of microscopic
materials is connected (logically and mathematically) with their
impasse and thoughless opinion about the creation of Universe
(space and time together) in the absolute distant past. Then…
they do not hesitate explain to us that the time is relative!
Has passed more time than three centuries, from when the
philosopher Spinoza lefts his philosophical theory, where in
there it described frugally the things, such as if these were
ways of existence in one only common substance. Fortunately for
the philosophy, Spinoza was not influenced from the mathematic
force and robust empirically foundations of the newer theory,
that formulated his modern giant of science, Newton. Nearly one
century of abundant scientific discoveries and still was not
found an inspired physicist to places the problem with the
simple logical thoughts and with a more intelligible physical interpretation. This is an other paradigmatic weakness in the
science, that shows the lack of imagination, the lack of
sharpness, the weakness of logical thought without the
mathematics, the timidity and the role that the biases play in
the research, even when the research becomes from the very well educated
scientists. In the particular case here, the bias is older and
difficult to be detected, because the daily experience
strengthens it, with many and easy observations!

It is the bias
about a clean segregation about the things, in the materials
things and forces
that practice from each other (these material things) and the
bias with a
simple thought about the creation of things from few structural
elements, which also these are connected externally from each
other, in similar exterior way that we observe in our visible
world. Because, in the science it should all things are
described clearly, with precision and without remains something
inexplicable, the forces were selected so as in the beauty
contests, as something vaguest, the less real and the inexplicable piece
of world. Thus, they thought to determine better these
invisible phenomena (of interaction), in order to disappear the invisibles and
the big scope forces. Their intelligent idea, they were inspired
by the observation of interactions that becomes in microscopic
scale. Thus the bias about a bridgeless segregation of world
between in
essential things and in insipid phenomena of action, it was
supplemented furthermore with the thought, that the invisible forces
that act at distance, they need the mediation of certain
concrete things, certain microscopic particles that are useful
as carriers for the transmission of energy.

The
bias about the
individual things that become by microscopic structural
elements, which are connected each from other only with exterior
and indirect effects (independent by the presence and the form of
a total of things), this is the same bias, which did not leave the
thought of researchers to see in what impasses leads the opinion
about an Universe, that is created by something else wholly different or
by the quantity of few structural elements. The Universe would
not be nothing other, without the evident existence of
individual things. The individual things create the total and
determine the form and the physical limits. The laws and the forces are
theoretical subterfuges in the human thought or emanate from the
rush complication of particles. So, it did not need they
think the role of the Total for the maintenance and creation
of individual things. This role is given in the microscopic
particles, that have a " scientific " concrete existence
and they can assemble the bigger things, after opposite is not
logical. Thus, they accepted the foolish assumption about a Big Bang as
something physical, while they considered unnatural and
impossible an uncreated Universe (in the contrary to the
individual things). Because -by their logic- all the things are
determined only with external connection and ultimately by
microscopic particles, that also are connected between them with
concretely forces...

Now, came the time,
where this blind philosophical opinion, that became a doctrine in
the Science (and the consequences of this doctrine upset the
fields in Ethics and Policy), is proved erroneous with mathematic
relations, that are applied in the things successfully, after these
mathematic relations should be adapted in order to they describe
wave phenomena where they create the particles! The
structural elements of things constitute " snaps " and stagnant
situations of the oscillation that becomes in a common, constant
and finite quantity of energy, in more high frequencies, so we
observe this energy as " empty " space. The
structural elements are created and maintained as particles in decreased
frequencies and speeds by the higher frequencies of waves, that
constitute the energy of empty space. And the all called
particles with their variety are not nothing other than sums of
(hf) energy, that are exchanged very rapidly, in different frequencies
and influenced from electromagnetic phenomena.

The philosophical
opinion about the role of the Total of things for the existence
and attributes of individual things, has supported of many
philosophers. About the role of the form and the total on the
individual elements has written many books and has become
investigations in psychology. This simple thought about the
essential role of the Total for its parts, constitutes the central idea of
the newer
(1986-1998) philosophical and cosmological theory under the
suggestive
title " Theory of the Complete Time and Relativity of Energy".
From the clarification that followed and from the development of
this newer philosophical theory (1999-2009), it became possible
to be observed and is formulated again, the role of a Common Total of
things for the existence of individual things and for the
attributes of structural elements, with the terms that are
used in the physics. Thus, now, the role of the Total is
revealed in the Science, in the phenomenon of empty (free) space and
with the electromagnetic phenomena, that are inherent at the
empty space and that cause the presence of the particles and
their attributes. Perhaps, up to few years ago, no one physicist did
not thinks insistently and did not prompt with the researches
and his work, to place rightly the problem about the structure
of matter. In the bibliography and publications, we do not
find easily some serious thought of a physicist about the case,
the structural elements they constitute particular, new and
unknown phenomena, that are caused by electromagnetic changes.
The marks were abundant and in this direction show.

As
we will see, the leading physicists since the decades that passed, they did
not make the simplest thoughts and did not place the most
obvious questions, before they place questions about the more
complex phenomena and front they seek solutions in more
complicated problems.

The
observation of limits in the physical changes in general, is one
from the many that escaped in the physics, leaving intact the
scientific doctrine about non-existence of limits in the nature
and downgrading the enormous experience from observations about
periodical phenomena and despite the knowledge about the universal physical constants (mainly h, G, c, pi).

In order to comes
out a constant relation from a process, the quantities or the
sizes should be altered with a limit and from each other made
dependent, at such way in order that, when a quantity is
decreased, the other is increased also on the contrary. When we
meet in the nature a constant relation which belongs in a
dynamic phenomenon or in a process of nature, if we are
intelligent researchers, immediately it should we think, that
this constant relation is results by certain changes that
somehow balance from each other.

Already since the
20th century, they have been expressed thoughts and opinions
about the decisive role of the free space in the structure of
matter. From the research heretofore, the clues and paradoxical
phenomena had multiplied and certain physicists they recognized
the impasse of a physical interpretation about the structure of
matter, if we had begin from separate particles. However, their
these advanced thoughts, they made them with full weakness to
interpret the presence of the free space, transferring again the
problem about the creation of matter in order to is solved in
the unknown future, with boat a hope! They made their thoughts
evaluating successfully after the information in the modern
research, without they interpret, even in general, how itself
the free space participates in the shaping of the structure of
matter, how are result its attributes, how all the different
phenomena are produced by changes in certain fundamental
relations as transformations of a (stable) quantity of energy.
Their contribution for the research would be more useful and
original, even if they advanced in the solution, even though
the formulation of questions, in the case where it was not
possible to advance with the mathematical language.

► Around us, they
becomes exchanges of energy and also interactions with the
matter in frequencies more than 1020
Hz, in microscopic dimensions and with the speed of light. Up to now, this reality
we didn't calculate it, we simplified it with the concept of the "free space" and we
perceived flippant its presence from the electromagnetic phenomena and gravity. An invisible reality participates permanently in the material
developments with sums of energy, that are exchanged and altered between 1020
- 1042 Hz and this reality they ignored in the science.
This reality participates permanently and simultaneously for
entire the material world, at the
one point up to the utmost other… In the physics, the sums of energy, that are
exchanged and altered in the very soon time intervals (t=1/f),
they called them "particles".

Do you speak still, about the total
creation of the Universe also about the fantasy of Big Bang ?

If you are researcher look in any case :

THE PROBLEM ABOUT THE
STRUCTURE OF MATTER ON THE RIGHT BASIS

MASS
AND ENERGY: TWO SIDE
OF VELOCITY IN THE STRUCTURE OF MATTER

THE FIRST REASONABLE THOUGHTS AND THE FIRST QUESTIONS

THAT DIRECT RIGHTLY THE RESEARCH

Did
they wonder in the modern cosmology, how complete can be a
physical interpretation about the Universe, such as they dreamed, when it doesn't offer the
minimal knowledge in order to is explained the presence of
the life in to Universe? The cosmological theories that have
been formulated with mathematics and are considered
prevailing theories do not open any passing to this
direction of nature. It would be supposed, the physicists to
understand this theoretical impasse as their problem and
they do not leave the problem unsolvable or for answer from the theology.

The life and the soul begin from the
microscopic dimensions and not by the combination of the coarse material bodies.
By no means accidental it is not! The Universe is self-existent, because it is
present, immutable and " solid " within the limits
of a biggest total time (max period) and about this reason
the Universe is immediately existing. In other words, the
full Universe exists simultaneously and the " immediately "
(directness) coincides with the " internal " and " inwardness ". From
this ostensibly absurdity and contradictory idea, we will
lead to incredible reasonable consequences and open the
street for the physical interpretation about phenomenon of
the life. The beginning of the life and timing in the
interaction between many particles are achieved with
the fastest ways of interaction and these ways presuppose the simultaneous
presence of the 100% complete Universe, that it appears in our eyes like an
absence of free space...