Purim

by Guest
Contributer: Yosey Goldstein

Rabbi Shimon Ben Lakish said: It was obvious and clearly known to
the creator of the universe that Haman would weigh coins (To kill) the
Jews. Therefore, he had their (The Jews) coins precede his coins, and that
is what the Mishna, Tannaic Passage says: "On the First day of Adar we make
the announcements about the giving of the yearly Shekolim/ coins to pay for
the communal sacrifices in the Bais Hamikdosh (Holy Temple) (Talmud, Tractate
Meggiloh 13b).

Tosefos (one of the early commentators) says that the 10,000 Kikar
(A specific measure) of silver offered was the same amount of silver the
Jews donated for the adanim, the sockets for below the planks making up the
walls in the Mishkon/Tabernacle which the Jews erected in the desert.
(Meggilah 16a)

It seems that Haman's action of offering 10,000 Kikar of silver to
King Acashverosh had an spiritual effect that "demanded" an action by
the Jews to counteract. It required a donation of the Jews, Hundreds of
year earlier, in the desert. to merit not being annihilated. (As Tosefos
points out) It also required the yearly donation to the Bais Hamikdosh
to counteract that action. The question is: Why is G-d worried about
Haman giving this money to Achashverosh? What difference does this make?

Reb Sholom Schvadron said the following answer, in the name of his
Rebbi, his teacher. The Medrash in Parshas Terumah tells us that Haman's
entire fortune consisted of 10,000 Kikar of silver. This means that he was
so dedicated to the cause of Killing the Jewish nation that he was willing
to give up everything he owned to succeed at his task. Such dedication, the
desire to succeed at all costs even to the cost of one's entire being and
life is called Mesiras Nefesh. Mesiras Nefesh must be answered. The Satan
(the adversary, a spiritual entity) himself approaches G-d and says "Haman
is willing to give up everything" to destroy the Jews. What are the Jews
willing to give up for G-d?" G-d must answer the demand of the Satan and he
says, "My Children are willing to give up for me. In fact they have given me
back in the desert, the silver sockets for Mishkon, the Tabernacle. They
give me one half Shekel every single Adar" That is what G-d answers the Satan.

There are several questions concerning this thought. First of all, what
difference does it make that Haman was dedicated? Why does that have an
effect in heaven? The second problem is Why did G-d choose the commandment
of the Machatzis hashekel, the giving of one half a shekel per person, to
counteract Haman? Why not point out the donations to build the *entire*
Mishkon which was certainly a greater amount donated than one half a shekel
per person? Let us just compare what Haman was willing to give up to what
the Jews gave up and give up yearly. Haman was willing to give up everything
to kill the Jews. That shows a dedication, a zeal and a passion for his
cause. The Jews, on the other hand gave no more than one half a Shekel for
this Mitzvah. Why is that the response to the zeal and Mesiras Nefesh shown
by Haman? One more question. Obviously Haman was dedicated to his cause, but
his cause was evil. Why should his dedication mean anything to G-d?

To understand the answer to the first question we should preface
that the rules of nature apply in the spiritual realm. Just as what goes
up must come down, every action has an equal reaction etc., so too
there are rules in the spiritual realm. One of these rules is: When one is
totally dedicated to a cause, he automatically receives Seyata Dishmaya or
heavenly assistance to succeed. That is why once Haman showed his commitment
and his zeal with the willingness to do anything to destroy Jews, G-d had to
answer the Satan with a show of Mesiras Nefesh, a show of complete dedication
on the part of the Jews. That was shown by the willingness of the Jews to
give the Machatzis Hashekel. (As we will explain G-d Willing very soon).

Rabbi Chaim Shmuelevitz ZT"L used this same line of reasoning to
explain a Posuk (passage) in Parshas Balak. The Posuk says, "Bilaam awoke
early in the morning and he saddled his donkey." Rashi quotes the
Medrash that says; "G-d says: "You got up early to destroy the Jews. You
will not succeed because their Father Abraham has already done this
before you." As the posuk states; "And Abraham got up early in the
morning and he saddled his donkey" (This was the story of the Akeidah,
when Abraham was going to offer his son Yitzchok up as a sacrifice). Reb
Chaim asks the same question we asked earlier; Why does the action of
Billaam waking up early to saddle his donkey require G-d to respond with
"Abraham their father has done this already"? What is so special with
Billaam saddling his donkey? The answer he gives is because Bilaam was very
aware of his own importance. Everything he did was only to further his own
honor and stature in the world. Still, he was willing to forgo his honor and
personally saddle his donkey so as to be able to curse the Jews and cause
their
annihilation. Therefore that dedication would demand that he be the
recipient of heavenly assistance and success. Therefore G-d said,
Abraham has already shown his dedication to me. He was willing to make
the ultimate sacrifice, literally, and sacrifice his son. Therefore, his
children are worthy of being saved because of his dedication.

It is interesting to note that Rabbi Shimon Schwab in his Sefer (book)
usesa very similar explanation. In the same story about Billaam, Bilaam in
a dream asks G-d permission to go with the second group of messengers of
Balak. G-d tells him, if they are coming to hire you and you will receive a
reward for
this, then go with them (Bamidbar 22:20 see Rashi). Rabbi Scwab Z"L asks
why did G-d give him permission only if he would get paid? The answer is,
says Rabbi Schwab, Because then his dedication to the cause in not pure.
His dedication comes from a desire to be compensated. If his dedication
to the cause is anything less than pure, then he will not be deserving of
heavenly assistance. He is doomed to failure. If he wants to go, no
harm will befall the Jews, and G-d Himself is willing to allow him to go.

This answered why there was need to counteract the dedication of
Haman, but the other questions still need answering. Why rely on the
Half a shekel instead of the donations for the entire tabernacle, and how
can the giving of one half a shekel show a dedication equivalent or
better than the giving of 10,000 kikar of silver.

We can understand the answer using the following rule. The Talmud in
Tractate Kiddushin tells us that one who is commanded to do a Mitzvah, a
commandment from G-d is greater than one who is not commanded to do the
Mitzvah but does it anyway. On the surface one would think the opposite is
true. One who is not obligated to do a mitzvah and does it anyway, shows a
greater love for G-d by doing the Mitzvah than one who is obligated to
perform the Mitzvah. The Talmud is telling us that this is not so. Tosefos
explains the reason for this. When a person is obligated to do something,
the Yetzer Horah, the evil inclination, tries desperately to dissuade the
person from doing the mitzvah. However, when a person does a mitzvah without
being obligated to do so, he has very little standing in his way. After all,
he wants to do this because he thinks it's right. He is doing what he
desires. (Remember back to when you were a child and you were tired? As soon
as your parents said "Time for bed" You suddenly had a burst of energy and
had no desire at all to go to sleep.)

Knowing this, the answer is simple. Haman was dedicated to his
cause. He was willing to give up everything to get what *he* wanted. To
counteract this action G-d needed to show that the Jews could also
perform an act that was equally meaningful and equally "powerful". That
act was the giving of one half a shekel. The act of being told, "You
must give one half a shekel. No more and no less" This action was one
that showed dedication to G-d and his Mitzvos. The will power needed to
overcome one's natural inclination not to want to give what one is
obligated to give, is more difficult that giving up 10,000 Kikar of silver.

This concept is also apparent in the Talmud in Tractate Shabbos. The
Mishna (Shabbos 9b) lists many activities that one may not do prior to
MIncha time, the time for the afternoon prayers. One of the forbidden
activities is to sit down to a meal. Nevertheless, the Talmud says that
if one started a meal, then one does not have to stop the meal right away,
for mincha. (He may continue until closer to the time for Mincha). The
Talmud asks what act determines the beginning of the meal? The Talmud
answers, when one removes his belt to begin eating. (They used to tie
their robes around them with a belt. Prior to eating they used to remove
the belt to be more comfortable when eating). The Talmud responds by
asking, What is the big deal to put the belt back on? Besides, let him pray
without a belt. The Talmud answers, He can not pray with out a belt
since the Posuk says, "Prepare yourself to greet your G-d." Tosefos (10a)
Says that the Talmud only answered the second question and did not
bother with the first question. Reb Yisroel Salanter answers, that by
answering the second question no answer was needed for the first
question. Once the Talmud explained and proved that one was not
allowed to pray without putting on the belt, then the question of, "What
is the big deal to put on a belt?" is not a question. Once a person is
required to put on his belt then it IS a big deal to put it back on.

Now everything makes perfect sense. In anticipation of Haman's
dedication to the cause of annihilating the Jews, G-d in his mercy gave
us the Mitzvah of Machatzis Hashekel, from the times of the Mishkon in
the desert. This allowed us to demonstrate our dedication to him by
giving the half a shekel to the Miskon. By serving G-d, we show our
dedication. By overcoming our own natural instincts, and accepting G-d's
will upon ourselves we show the greatest Mesirras nefesh, the greatest
dedication to G-D and his will.