In today's "That's WAY Too Much Information" segment, New York Times columnist David Brooks claims that while he was dining with a Republican senator, the guy had his hand on Brooks's inner thigh the whole time.

Similar to the “unnamed sources” ruse. As long as they’re unnamed, they don’t have to be real. Our side should take a stand on this: if they’re not going to name them, WE should not assume they’re telling the truth.

Pretty talented guy who only uses one hand to complete a full meal. I wonder if he had steak? I’d like to have seen that accomplishment. I think this story is BS. Since when is the NY Times worried about secrecy?

16
posted on 07/11/2009 7:32:08 AM PDT
by mass55th
(Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.