News & Current EventsDiscuss Hillary Clinton claims allegations against Bill, Kavanaugh are different. Her reasoni at the General Forum; It's different....
Bubba lied under oath and there's physical evidence of what he did. There's nothin' at all against Kav. ...

Hillary Clinton claimed Tuesday there is a “significant difference” between allegations of sexual assault against her husband, former President Bill Clinton, and those raised against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and President Donald Trump.

CNN’s Christiane Amanpour interviewed Hillary Clinton about her upcoming international tour, which will kick off in Las Vegas after the November midterms. Amanpour noted that Clinton will certainly face questions about former President Clinton’s numerous sexual assault allegations.

What did she say?

“Are you prepared to answer those questions? Is he prepared to answer them? Amanpour asked. “And how do you see that, similar or different, from what President Trump is accused of? And Kavanaugh?”

“Well, I think there is a very significant difference,” Hillary Clinton responded.

The twice-failed presidential candidate cited the Ken Starr investigation, which concluded that then-President Clinton lied under oath when he denied having sexual relations with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Clinton characterized the Starr investigation as an “intense, long-lasting partisan investigation.”

“If, you know, the Republicans, starting with President Trump on down, want a comparison, they should welcome such an investigation themselves,” Clinton said.

However, there are significant differences between the allegations of sexual misconduct against former President Clinton and those against Trump and Kavanaugh. Namely, there is evidence against Clinton — including Lewinsky’s dress — while allegations against Trump and Kavanaugh stem mostly from unsubstantiated accounts.

Specifically, several women accused Kavanaugh of misconduct, but not a single witness or shred of evidence corroborated the accusers’ accounts.

Also, as Juanita Broaddrick, an Arkansas woman who alleges former President Clinton raped her in 1978, noted Tuesday, not every allegation against Bill Clinton has been investigated.

YOU LYING HYPOCRITE @HillaryClinton My case was NEVER litigated!!That’s why I’m calling for an investigation now. IF I CAN GET 100k signatures, the WORLD will KNOW IT, Hillary. THEN where will you hide? https://t.co/WOGN40Nr8H

Allegations of rape vs allegations of rape along with physical evidence.

Allegations of rape with details on when, where, who was there, along with physical evidence and corroborating witnesses. Against a person who was at the time in a position of power. Allegations are consistent with documented current behavior.

vs

Allegations of ATTEMPTED rape with only a vague statement of when and where it happened, no physical evidence, and no corroborating witnesses. Against a person who was nothing more than a 17 year old boy at the time. Allegations are inconsistent with current behavior.

Anyone that castigates Kavanaugh while giving Clinton a pass should be deeply embarrassed.

You do know that we are not talking about the Monika thing right? There were several allegations of rape and attempted rape, and Hillary sought to destroy the women, as if Bill was not an accomplished sexual predator already.

You do know that we are not talking about the Monika thing right? There were several allegations of rape and attempted rape, and Hillary sought to destroy the women, as if Bill was not an accomplished sexual predator already.

Yes, your right, this stuff should have been nipped in the bud when Bill was doing it 20 years ago. But instead, the left praised him and gave him a pass, which in turn, gave ALL men a pass, until Trump was elected.