Hillary’s Hidden Agendas (Part[s] ???)

Did you know?
As a senior at Wellesley College, Hillary Rodham wrote her thesis on the tactics of radical community organizer Saul Alinsky. In 1993, this thesis was hidden from view at the request of the Clinton White House. And why would that be, pray tell? Glad you asked. Before we get into “the why” the thesis was hidden from public knowledge, let us check a few things out.

From Politico, we find this: “Instead of being embraced by liberal blogs as the first serious woman presidential contender, Clinton has been labeled an “opportunist,” the candidate more interested in getting elected than in standing on principle. “Her model of doing politics is based on pandering to individual groups,” said MyDD’s Matt Stoller. He cited Clinton’s stance on Iran “she’s giving cover to Bush’s strategy” and her fund raiser with News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch as evidence that she’d rather triangulate than play the role of progressive.” [this is a hint] What is the political term “progressive” camouflage for? [hint]

The Outer Limits members of the Democratic Party are actually the far left socialists and have their allegiances sworn to groups such as A.N.S.W.E.R. Just in case you don’t know or choose to ignore this, one of the members of the Steering Committee for the A.N.S.W.E.R. group is Party for Socialism and Liberation. Just thought you’d like to know. [that was another hint]

So why is Hillary now catering to this crowd which is made up of quite a few people with very loud mouths but certainly NOT a majority of Americans. They are a minority in NUMBERS and their alleged “growth” is waning and waxing thin. Some call her an opportunist. I call her a deceptive liar but that’s just me. I call her an appeaser and a pretty lame People Pleaser. She caters to this crowd because she MUST have their votes and these people are dumber than a box of rocks and they have no leaders among them…they are followers and they need someone to follow. They are going to vote for a socialist liberal for president anyway, no matter who the DNC chooses. Can you see them voting for Fred Thompson? Hillary is dumber than the kook leftist fruit loops catering to these insignificant whelps. I thought she was smart?

So, why did the Clintons suppress the thesis in 1993? If it was such a grandly written piece, why hide it? If it was her coup d’egras of written lore, why the hush-hush? There are all kinds of speculation(s).

WASHINGTON–Hillary Rodham Clinton’s long buried Wellesley College senior undergraduate thesis about Chicago legendary community organizer Saul Alinsky–sealed during the years when she was first lady–was dug up for MSNBC by investigative journalist Bill Dedman–a Chicago Sun-Times alum.

The contents of the thesis were long thought by Clinton biographers and commentators to be important to understanding the roots of her political philosophy. Dedman found the thesis, writes about how and why the Clintons wanted it buried and how he found it hiding in plain sight.

Dedman also notes that Barack Obama, who moved to Chicago to become a community organizer himself, was influenced by the Alinsky legacy. (go here)

The rantings of this “progressive” Alinsky was primarily that one needed an enemy to motivate a body of people. If there wasn’t an enemy around, you created one.

“She titled the paper, written to fulfill her Bachelor of Arts degree at Wellesley College, “There is Only the Fight.” It praises the work of radical activist Saul Alinsky, a man who epitomized a self-interested no-holds barred campaign style that Hillary has emulated in later years. Clinton’s savvy-but-ruthless politics, including the “politics of personal destruction” she so often condemns but more often practices, seem rooted in Alinsky’s famous rules for radicals.

One year after Hillary turned in her thesis, Time Magazine profiled Alinsky. Their assessment was much different than hers. It said, “In his [Alinsky’s] view, the end of achieving power justifies a range of means…If the occasion requires, Alinsky’s forces will not refrain from spreading rumors about an antagonist or indulging in something that comes very close to blackmail.” (go here)

I suppose Barak found out about that “dirty pool” tactic she learned way back when, eh?

So why did The Clintonistas “hide” that thesis? Hint: Hillary is an evil and manipulating woman and she will do whatever it takes to get things her way.

7 Responses to “Hillary’s Hidden Agendas (Part[s] ???)”

I agree whole-heartly with these conclusions! This is a dangerous woman,
whose campaign tactics just exude Alisnsky ‘tactics’! The whole CLinton
Presidency, was nuanced by classic, ‘end justifys the means’, with a twist.
That is, to say, it was an Alinsky justification, and not a ‘Candidian’
optimisam/pessimisam regimen!
Please try to get this message out!!!!!!!!
THanks,
Barry

Has anyone noticed on this weeks cover of Time magazine (May 5th, 2008) the one with the split faces Obama and Clinton? Look closely at her collar. You can plainly see the words “Never” in her collar. Its really weird it almost seems that there are other words that were hidden by some bad photoshop-ing. You think this was deliberate?