Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Are you planning to ignore my objections to it?
> The author replied addressing your objections and I saw no reply from on
> on that.
He replied stating his opinion; my opinion didn't change. I was waiting
for some other people to weigh in with their opinions. As far as I've
seen, no one else has commented at all.
If I get voted down on the point after suitable discussion, so be it.
But I will strongly object to you applying the patch just because it's
next in your inbox.
regards, tom lane