The NEA’s “experts” claim that pouring money into education will eradicate poverty is wrong on all counts. For example, they state that children would be better educated by attending a “high quality pre-school.” Yet Head Start, according to Reason’s Lisa Snell, U. of Arkansas Professor Jay Greene and others, has been a bust. In 2010, Lindsey Burke at the Heritage Foundation wrote,

Taxpayers have been on the hook for more than $100 billion for the Head Start program since 1965. This federal evaluation, which effectively shows no lasting impact on children after first grade and no difference between those children who attended Head Start and those who did not, should call into question the merits of increasing funding for the program, which the Obama administration recently did as part of the so-called “stimulus” bill.

So, $100 billion later, children are no better off attending a preschool, but what’s important to the unions is that more adults are employed. And that means more dues for them to spend on their progressive political agenda which favors causes that have little to do with education – e.g. abortion on demand, same-sex marriage, income redistribution, and nationalized health care. In 2010-2011, NEA spent $133 million in lobbying and gifts to further its progressive agenda.

Also, with all the union kvetching, one might assume that we stint on education spending. In fact, in the U.S. since 1970, education spending has increased 150 percent. Compared to other countries around the world, we are number four in spending after Luxembourg, Switzerland and Norway. Yet,
The three-yearly OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) report, which compares the knowledge and skills of 15-year-olds in 70 countries around the world, ranked the United States 14th out of 34 OECD countries for reading skills, 17th for science and 25th for mathematics.

Thus the problem is not the amount of money we spend, but how it’s spent. Charter schools typically lead to better educated kids and save us money at the same time. Inner city charter school operators like Eva Moskowitz and Geoffrey Canada and the KIPP schools do a far better job – with fewer tax dollars – than traditional public schools. Even taking the superstars of the movement out of the mix, charter schools outperform traditional public schools. As Jay Greene writes, “Charter Benefits Are Proven by the Best Evidence.”

But no, the NEA doesn’t back charters. And the reason it doesn’t has nothing to do with education; it’s because charters are individually run and therefore very hard to unionize. In fact, only 12 percent of the nation’s 5,500 or so charters are unionized.

If the teachers unions were really serious about improving education and eradicating poverty, they would support the ultimate in school choice – voucher systems. A voucher would give a kid a chance to opt out of a failing public school and use his education dollars to pay for a private school of his choice. This would level the playing field for poorer families. However, the unions can’t abide vouchers because public schools would lose students to private schools, which are not unionized.

Eliminating the twin evils of tenure and seniority would go a long way to improving the current teaching force, by ceding more power to individual school districts. Bad teachers should be fired and the good ones should get raises. Better teachers can also handle slightly larger classes, thereby reducing the overall number of teachers we need.

But saving the taxpayers money, leveling the playing field for the poor, ceding power to local education agencies and thus having fewer dues-paying members are solutions nowhere to be found in the union playbook.

The nation’s education woes began about forty years ago – right at the time the NEA became a major force in education. Certainly other social trends have contributed to the educational morass we find ourselves in, but the National Education Association is the main reason for it – all the time using young children as pawns while vigorously pursuing its political agenda. Despite all the warm and fuzzy platitudes they spew, it is obvious that the teachers unions are not terribly interested in the education of our children or helping them get out of poverty.

(Larry Sand, a former classroom teacher, is the president of the non-profitCalifornia Teachers Empowerment Network – a non-partisan, non-political group dedicated to providing teachers with reliable and balanced information about professional affiliations and positions on educational issues. Originally posted on UnionWatch.)

if you want to upgrade education get rid of the federal dept of education. what a waste of money. the next thing to go is the NEA and the CTA. both are destroying education. there should be some type of tenure for teachers. if you have a problem with the administration that has nothing to do with the ability to teach they could fire at will. most administrators are there because they were so-so teachers not because they were great teachers. because there is some poverty in california does not mean students can not get a quality education. why is there no money for vocational education, math, science, english, but more than enough to teach queerdom? if the administration is so great why is there no discipline in public schools? the thing now in education is this crap that all kids are going to college. if the colleges are so great than why cant most grads get a job? teach kids how to think and teach job skills. students who work after school do better in school than the ones that dont. leave morals to the parents! i pray that Brown and the other Democrates rot in hell for what they are doing to public education!!!

They are claiming “Poverty?”. Thats a laugh, they are so “poor” but they have plenty of money to donate to special interest groups that they favor. They also claim that they provide “Quality” education. Ha! then why are we at the bottom of the list in children’s test scores. How about an explaination of that? What kind of “Quality” teachers do we have? when things like that happen or is it just a ploy to say “We need to give more raises to teachers”. Think about it.

To all: Read all tax initiatives carefully before election day. MoonBeam’s answer to the education problem actually funnels money into the general fund, with a small portion going to education. Craft fully written political bait and switch. The money will help education?????or will it bail out the disgraceful California Pension system????? I can’t recall how many “billions” of dollars were approved by voters for “bonds” for the sake of the “children” I don’t know about the rest of you, but I’m getting gun shy of approving anything with more spending or more taxes every election. Despite our (California’s) dire financial crisis, MoonBeams 2012/2013 budget is up 10% from the previous years budget. Insane!! If you’re going bankrupt, it’s time to cut spending.

Ca Teachers Union-huge communist group,anyone watch Glenn Beck’s special on this bunch? He spelled it all out. Defund Dept of Ed. it needs to go back to the states ASAP. The “New Democratic Socialist” party as they have renamed themselves has USED education for children for a 100 yrs and everyone has fallen for their scheme,when all along the people were the ones getting scammed. Sooner or later this bunch will run out of other peoples money. Ca teachers union can “go pound sand”.