Stefan Reinauer wrote:
>> Other questions:
> - Can we drop flash_on? The code seems included in flash_rom and it
> only works on old sis stuff anyways. We will not drop functionality
> by dropping this extra binary.
drop it.
>> - Should we rename the utility to flash_and_burn or should we rename
> the directory to flash_rom? There's a lot of confusion since the
> utility and it's location in the source tree have different names.
for (i = 0; i < total_size / page_size; i++) {
>
yeah, that sounds good. I will miss the name flash_and_burn though.
ron