HI,
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 03:43:23PM +0200, furio ercolessi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 03:29:23PM +0200, furio ercolessi wrote:
> > [...]
> > Now, RIPE-582 (February 2013) contains the following text:
> >
> > "6.6 Validity of an Assignment
> > All assignments are valid as long as the original criteria on which the
> > assignment was based are still valid and the assignment is properly
> > registered in the RIPE Database. If an assignment is made for a specific
> > purpose and that purpose no longer exists, the assignment is no longer
> > valid."
> >
> > Therefore, if the above premises are correct, spamming ranges are
> > classified "not valid" - simply because snowshoe spam was not the
> > motivation given to get the assignment.
This paragraph mentions *assignments*, which is (in the context of LIRs)
what a LIR gives to it's customers.
So indeed, if a customer is lying to the LIR, the assignment falls back
to the LIR (which makes a difference when the LIR's allocation is full
and they can't get more space because their assignments are not valid).
This paragraph does not apply to the *allocation* give to the LIR from
the RIPE NCC.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20130629/ad35a047/attachment.bin