OH. I'M SCARED. I EVEN UNDERSTAND YOUR LANGUAGE. NO DON'T WORRY , This is your forum. the discussion was regarding whether Croatians are related to persians. That's it. Big deal. Take care guys. have a good time. I don't leave here because I am scared of you. I go only my culture doesn't let me to offend people that are not worth to be offended. I am not a Muslim. And from this point, this disussion is turning to an uneducated fight. you can't imagine who are you talking to . I will not say anything because of the rules here. CRAOTIAN BROTHERS. I DON'T THINK THIS IS THE RIGHT PAGE TO TALK ABOUT THIS I WILL POST YOU INDIVIDUALLY REGARDING OUR FURTHER TALKS. DO NOT REPLY TO MY MESSAGE HERE AS YOU DO NOT SEE ME POSTING HERE ANYMORE.Bye

INSP if you want to propagate that you iranians are the aryans, well then, go and do that in Iran, OK.
You do not have any right to came here and start some fights between our members with your theory`s and wishes.
The main fact is that you people are muslims and that`s the end of discussion.

To Mauzer_NS33, Brother or Cousin, your choice. This is your idea and respectable.
First of all Persians are not minority in Iran. 51 percent does not represent a minority. Secondly, being ruled by Arab and Mongols, do not mean that we've been marrying with them. Serbs and Southern Germans did not become Turks because Turks ruled a huge chunk of Balkan for many years. Therefore as an Aryan majority we have more tendency than other countries like USA, Canada or many European countries that have become a nest for non - Aryan or even non sub- Aryan nation. Bravo to Iranians that kept themselves as pure as possible with all the attacks against them.
Iran is like Italy and Greece. Southern part of Iran is darker complexion and Northern and Western part is white. Comparing Iran with India is not a right comparison as India is a brown nation. Iran is considered a Caucasian country.

Add the Mazanis, Azeris and Kurds to the rest of us and it makes more than 80 percent of population. We are an Aryan nation by fact.
Now if you want to have a different idea. Go ahead and have it. I do not need to bring you a proof when I see all my family is not a brown branch of Iranian race. lol. I am a Persian and am proud of it but this does not necessarily mean that I hate my other fellow Iranians. We Iranian nationalists like to educate all Iranians to be united to fight the enemies of Aryana , Iran.
We cannot be divided and won't be divided. I don't know about Iranian National Socialist Party. But as an Iranian nationalist, I have my own ideas.
I prefer unity of Aryan countries to fight our common enemies Islam and Zionism.
At the same time, I respect your idea and wish you success in your battle to defend your people and race. Yes of course you always have my respect because you have culture and you are an extremely educated and polite person. Am I crazy to engage fights when I can have a normal talk? Thanks for your words. I really respect them

The real is problem not that Iran is assumed a racially mixed country because of Arab and Mongol incursions, the problem many Euro racialists have in accepting Iranians is spelled out in one word NORDICISM.
This is true even though many of the Euro-Whites are not aware of it. Why?
Well all conceded that not every native of Iran is White, The NWS are roughly 10-20% of the population. However the great majority of Whites are Meds.If the same identical persons were from Southern Europe, only hard core Nordicists would question them.
In fact, most anti-Iranian Euro Whites have a double standard of Whiteness for Iran when compared to Europe and North America, in that they don't consider anyone White regardless of appearance, or that they consider only clasically Nordic appearaing Iranians White, who all concede are a very distinct minority.
Now an issue has been raised about even White appearing Iranians being suspect unless they can prove they were White for 10 generations back due to allegeed massive mixing. Several points are reelevant here.

(1) This same argument has been used against White Latins from South America. Yet this standard is never employed against Whites from countries with widespread mixing like South Africa, where the Colored minority is so large it now exceeds the White population, or agaist places with microscopic White popualtions like Guyana, Jamacia, Barbadoes, Surinam. Why, because the White in question and the former colonial powers were North European

(2) There was no long period of Arab occupation of Iran as a whole, though Arabs and Aryans have long been jousting over a small but very strategic area of Southwest Iran called Kuzhkstan, where there is a large Arab presence, AND most of Iran's oil.
The Islamic conquests were carried out with a mere 18000 men against a population of 12 million. Though Iran was quickly Islamicized, and the ancient Persian script was replaced by Arabic script, any genetic impact is minimal.

(3) The Mongols under Hulagu and later Tamerlane commited a horiffic genocide against millions of Iranian Whites and other Whites in the ME. Your history books never make any reference to the race of the victims of the Mongols, but thats what most of their victims were, White.
It is true that the historical area of Iran was larger than the territory Iran occupies today. She controlled huge portions of Central Asia and before these incursions, these areaswere and since the beinning of the existence of humansm had been dominated by Aryans.
Tragically, horrific rape and murder DID result in the lossof these areas to our race, though Mother Russia was well on her way to recovering them for us and flooding them with Slavic Aryans , when the Communist butchers thwarted this wonderful example of racial reconquest...but thats another story.
The point is that these lost areas are located outside Iran, namely being Kazhakstan, Turkmenistan, Khirghiza, and the one surviving area that is still Aryan , Tajikstan. People with Mongol mixture are largely confined to the Northwest border of Iran. Yes , the mixing took place, but most of it was outside what is now Iran.
Let Euro-Aryan Whites and Irano-Aryan Whites someday unite to recover these lost lands and kick the Mongols back to Mongolia!

(4)Its probably true that most of the people that we could regard as racially mixed in Iran are neither Mongols or Arabs but Dravidians.The Brits among us would pretty much recognize them as dark Pakis. They came into place less through any spectacular invasions then simply through thousands of years of movement as traders and laborers. Still they are truly widespread only in Baluchistan in the far SW, and to a lesser extent along the Persian Gulf.

INSP, I am interested in a couple of things.
First you say that your opinion on this matter is not the same as the articles you've been posting. But then you say that the SLAVS are Croatian brothers. It is very obvious that you think that the Croats aren't Slavs. And still, you "agreed" with my last post, which had me completely confused. So, could you tell me, what IS your opinion?
What do you think the Croats are, or the Serbs, for that matter?

See, these theories sound the same to me as the ones in which the Serbs are "the oldest nation". And even for this theory I could give you some evidence. You see, according to the Serbian calendar we are in the year 7512. There are so called "Lepenski vir" and Djerdap archeological sites, which totaly dismiss the theories that the Serbs came in the Europe in 6th century AD, and that they lived here long before that.

But let's go back to this Croatian-Iranian theory.
Are there any REAL evidence that the Croatians are from Iran, apart from the linguistic "proof", which is far from enough?

Bulair, could you too give me some web sites, or something like that about that theory of yours that the Bulgarians are from Iran, and that they were not a Turkish tribe?
Thanks.

P.S. I've heard the news today, and there was something about the elections in Iran. It seems that the conservative Muslims have won.

P.P.S. I would also like if you guys who are from Iran could tell me what kind of religion you support, since I can see that you don't like Islam. But what kind of paganism do you prefer - sumerian?

Bulair, could you too give me some web sites, or something like that about that theory of yours that the Bulgarians are from Iran, and that they were not a Turkish tribe?
Thanks.

The were a turkish tribe, but originated from Iran.I know some sites in Bulgarian, check tribal.abv.bg.The facts are that they didn't look mongoloid.A picture of khan Krum has been preserved with the help of some artist from the middle ages.It is obvious that he didn't have mongoloid eyes.

Samhain, great sites!
Do you have some links to web sites about prof. Srejovic's research in Serbian?

Bulair, I think that I can agree with you about what you've said, since it is a similar story as with the Hungarians.
Unfortunately, I can't find my way around this site which is in bulgarian (well maybe I could, but I can't at the moment ).