among the groups of undertakings concerned there are at least two the net turnover of which exceeded HUF 1 billion (approx. EUR 3,2 million).

The result? The second prong of the twofold threshold test in Hungary was doubled and the expectation was that it would result in a 10 to 15% drop in notifications. Indeed, the first six months of the revised filing test fulfilled these expectations, with no substantial increase in the number of merger cases in front of the NCA despite the upheaval of the M&A market in general.

THE SOFT THRESHOLD INTRODUCED

What changed? Under a completely new rule, a merger also became notifiable in Hungary, if:

it is not clear whether the merger will significantly impede effective competition on the relevant market or not.

The result? Although the market shares held by the undertakings concerned and the structure of the relevant market(s) are primarily indicative to judge how and when this soft threshold will trigger a merger filing requirement in Hungary, the expectation was that the upcoming practice of the Hungarian NCA would further fine-tune the relevant conditions. The tsunami of merger cases under this soft threshold which could give a better indication of the NCA's preferred approach has not arrived, yet. However, it is clear that the new soft threshold will be particularly relevant for the information and new technology sectors when leading market players are acquiring innovative start-up businesses.

UPDATES TO MERGER CONTROL PROCEEDINGS

What changed? Among the novelties on the procedural front, there are some changes to the soft threshold:

there is no stand-still obligation with respect to the soft threshold and hence the NCA is formally not authorized to impose fines on the merging undertakings for gun-jumping; and

mergers caught by the soft threshold may be brought under a merger control review only if the NCA has commenced its proceedings within six months after the implementation of the transaction.

Furthermore, all mergers in general were made subjected to dawn raids in case the NCA suspect that the undertakings concerned has:

breached the standstill obligation; or

withheld information from the NCA or provided misleading information during the merger control procedure.

The result? As a result, the NCA's investigatory powers were brought on par with those of the European Commission. None of these rules have been put to the test yet.

The introduction of summary review proceedings, however, which allow an 8-day clearance of filings raising no competition concerns proved to be very successful; already making up some 50% of all merger case in the first half of 2017.