The solution to bad capitalism is good capitalism. All the "1%" people have to do is spend more money in better place's. The solution to bad socialism is capitalism. People need to stop acting like they know what's best for others. You get what you work for, and you can't help someone you dont know

Fallacy Of Special Pleading

This claims that the top 1% need to act like they know what is best for others by spending money in better places, but people should not act like they know what is best for others.

Begging The Question

I've never understood why voter id laws must necessarily discriminate against minorities. Even a minority has an identity. If he or she can demonstrate that identity, and that identify is a qualified voter (qualified by age, etc), then he/she can vote.

Irrelevant Conclusion

The point was about obtaining official identification forms not "having an identity".

Appeal To Authority

CSIRO: “By 2030 the LCOE ranges of both conventional coal and gas technologies as well as wind and large-scale solar converge to a common range of A$50 to A$100 per megawatt hour.” (LCOE is levelized cost of electricity)

Fallacy Of Slippery Slope

Common range implies similarity however does not confirm such as it is ‘levelised’. Model is based on learning rates, which is based on installed capacity, which is based on subsidies. Too many assumptions have been made.

"Given the nature and dilution of chemicals used in Australian operations, fracking does not impair water quality." (APPEA)
“Academic and government studies in US, UK and New Zealand have shown fracking is safe.”

Appeal To Authority

NY Times found never-reported EPA studies that concluded some drilling sites were incapable of removing certain water contaminants and were probably violating the law.
https://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/27/us/27gas.html

Begging The Question

Whilst LNG burns cleaner than coal, the net impact of shale gas availability on carbon emissions in the long-term could prove to increase GHG emissions. French-German study in Climate Policy took into account the fossil-fuel substitution effect, low-carbon substitution effect which included the domination of gas in preference to renewables, as well as the increase in energy consumption as natural gas prices decrease to conclude that by 2050, GHG emissions would increase by 0.8% if shale gas was widely available.