FEAR or FAITH? FRIGHT or FLIGHT?Welcome Eagles to the New Crusade!Will thou help defend the Fortress of Faith?BOOKMARK us & check in DAILY for the latest Endtimes News!SPREAD WORD TO YOUR FRIENDS & FAMILY!

"And I beheld, and heard the voice of one eagle flying through the midst of heaven, saying with a loud voice: Woe, woe, woe to the inhabitants of the earth....[Apocalypse (Revelation) 8:13]

Thursday, June 22, 2017

Washington’s Dangerous Middle East Agenda

It’s clear at this point that the recent visit of US President
Trump to Saudi Arabia and Israel was about setting events into motion in
order to fundamentally alter the present balance of power in the entire
Middle East to the greater advantage of the United States and US energy
geopolitics. As with most everything that Washington tries to do to
rebuild its rapidly declining global dominance, this latest move by
Washington to incite the Saudi Kingdom to ignite regime change in Qatar
and escalate a form of oil war disguised as a Sunni-Shi’ite power
conflict already looks in serious trouble.
I share with you a recent interview with an Arabic-language Middle East magazine in question and answer format.

Q: What can you say about the conflict between Qatar Gulf at this moment after the Arabic-Islamic-American summit at Riyadh? WE: In my view this is a deep power struggle between Qatar
and Saudi Arabia that has little to do with stated reasons regarding
Muslim Brotherhood and Iran. The action to isolate Qatar was clearly
instigated during US President Trump’s recent visit in Riyadh where he
pushed the unfortunate idea of a Saudi-led “Arab NATO” to oppose Iranian
influence in the region. The Saudi move, clearly instigated by Prince Bin Salman,
Minister of Defense, was not about going against terrorism. If it were
about terrorism, bin Salman would have to arrest himself and most of his
Saudi cabinet as one of the largest financiers of terrorism in the
world, and shut all Saudi-financed madrasses around the world, from
Pakistan to Bosnia-Herzgovina to Kosovo. Another factor according to
informed sources in Holland is that Washington wanted to punish Qatar
for seeking natural gas sales with China priced not in US dollars but in
Renminbi. That apparently alarmed Washington, as Qatar is the world’s
largest LNG exporter and most to Asia. Moreover, Qatar was acting increasingly independent of the
heavy Wahhabite hand of Saudi Arabia and threatening Saudi domination
over the Gulf States. Kuwait, Oman, as well as non-Gulf Turkey were
coming closer to Qatar and even Pakistan now may think twice about
joining a Saudi-led “Arab NATO”. Bin Salman has proven a disaster as a
defense strategist, as proven in the Yemen debacle. As to the future, it appears that Qatar is not about to rollover
and surrender in face of Saudi actions. Already Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad
al-Thani is moving to establish closer ties with Iran, with Turkey that
might include Turkish military support, and most recently with Russia.
Kuwait and Oman are urgently trying to get Saudi to backdown on this,
but that is unlikely as behind Saudi Arabia stands the US and promises
of tens of billions of dollars in US arms. This foolish US move to use
their proxy, in this case Riyadh, to discipline those not “behaving”
according to Washington wishes, could well be the turning point, the
point of collapse of US remaining influence in the entire Middle East in
the next several years. Q: Terrorism threatens the world. What in your view,
according to what you wrote in your book, A Century of War:
Anglo-American Oil Politics” and other writings about DAESH (IS) is the
real story behind the recent so-called “clashes of civilizations between
East and West and between the West and Islam?

WE: We must keep in mind that all serious terrorist
organizations are state-sponsored. All. Whether DAESH or Al Nusra or
Mujahideen in Afghanistan or Maute Group in Philippines. The relevant
question is which states sponsor which terrorists. Today NATO is the one
most complicit in sponsoring terrorism as a weapon of their
geopolitical designs. And within NATO the United States is sponsor
number one, often using Saudi money and until recently, ironically,
Qatari funds. My newest book, The Lost Hegemon: Whom the Gods Would Destroy,
gives a far more detailed road-map of the use made by both British
intelligence, by the Third Reich under Himmler, and since the 1950s, by
the CIA, of especially the Muslim Brotherhood and its later “offspring”
including Afghan Mujahideen of Osama bin Laden–a part of CIA’s Operation
Cyclone to defeat the Soviets in Afghanistan during the 1980s. The CIA’s Mujahideen, trained by Pakistan’s ISI and recruited
for the CIA by Osama bin Laden under the supervision of Prince Turki
al-Faisal, the notorious head of Saudi Intelligence, were then brought
by CIA private airlines after the Soviets left Afghanistan in 1989, into
former Soviet Union republics to sow trouble. This included Azerbaijan,
where the CIA used them to topple the government in favor of the Aliyev
dictatorship that was amenable to giving oil rights to BP and American
companies and to abandoning using the Soviet era oil pipeline through
Russia’s Chechnya. Then the CIA brought the Afghan Mujahideen veteran terrorists
they had trained– including Osama bin Laden–they brought them into
Chechnya to destabilize Russia’s oil pipeline route from Baku across
Russia. That was to open the way for the Anglo-American
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline. Control the oil. In my book, The Lost Hegemon–the United States as Sole
Superpower after 1990 is meant–I trace the evolution of these CIA
mercenary terrorists who hide behind the facade of being “devout Muslim
fundamentalists.” The CIA and Pentagon brought them into Iraq after 2003
where US military operations under General David Petraeus, in effect
created Al Qaeda in Iraq. Then the US launched the Arab Spring in 2011
to force regime change across the entire Muslim world, in a move to
militarily control all oil and gas resources there, long a dream of the
CIA and what some call the US “Deep State.” When the Washington Arab Spring could not bring down Libya’s
Qaddafi by peaceful protests as in Tunisia or Egypt, Washington opted
for a military solution using France and NATO bombs as the up front
actor. However, when they then tried the same in Syria against Bashar Al
Assad, who opposed the Washington agenda, they were unable to do so,
mainly because of UN security council vetoes by Russia and China. After
September 2015 when Russia answered Assad’s plea for help against
foreign terrorists and Russia brilliantly and swiftly responded, it
exposed for all the world to see that Washington had been lying about
trying to defeat DAESH or the so-called Islamic State. The real story behind the rise of so-called Islamic Terrorism
is the increasingly desperate attempt of the Anglo-American Deep State
to control the rise of Eurasia, especially of China in combination now
with Russia, and increasingly with Iran and Central Asian republics as
well as South Asian. Without understanding this, none of the recent
events in the Middle East make sense. Washington strategists today foolishly believe that if they get
choke point control of all Middle East oil and gas, they can, as Henry
Kissinger stated back in the 1970’s “control the oil and thus, control
entire nations,” especially China and Russia and also Germany and
Europe. Their strategy has failed but Washington and the Pentagon refuse
to see the reasons for their repeated filed wars. The hidden reality of
American global power is that the American “giant” today is a bankrupt
superpower, much like Great Britain after their Great Depression of 1873
up to 1914. Britain triggered a world war in 1914 to desperately try to
retain their global power. They failed, for reasons I discuss in my
Century of War book. Today for much the same reasons–allowing the power of US
financial conglomerates supercede the interests of the national
industrial economy– America’s debt, national, private, corporate, is out
of control. Reagan and Cheney were dead wrong. Debt does matter. Eight years after the greatest financial crisis in history, the
US real estate crisis of 2008, the US Central Bank is unable to raise
its interest rates above 1% without risking a new financial meltdown.
That alone suggests the degree of the dollar system crisis. Private
economists estimate that real US unemployment today is near 23% of the
workforce not the mythical 4-5% cited by the US Government. Q: How would you comment on the position of the United states regarding Arab-Arab and Islamic-Islamic conflicts ? WE: Washington wants conflict in order to divide and
rule. As Dick Cheney said in a London speech in September 1999 to the
London Institute of Petroleum when Cheney was CEO of the world’s largest
oilfield services company, Halliburton, the oil-rich states of the
Middle East is “where the prize ultimately lies.” US policy has been to
break the control of Arab national monarchies and the threat from the
rising wealth of oil-based Arab sovereign wealth funds which were
threatening to go away from the dollar. Case in point, in 2010 under initiative from LIbya’s Qaddafi,
Tunisia’s Ben Ali and Egypt’s Mubarak and Libya were planning to issue
an Arab Gold Dinar and to demand payment for their oil exports in gold
dinar and not US dollars, the seed of a Pan-Arab Bank. That would have
spelled the end of the dollar, the key pillar of US hegemony. The
released emails of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to her
private Libya adviser, Sid Blumenthal, confirm this as the reason for
Washington urgency in removing those three–Bin Ali, Mubarak and Qaddafi
in their so-called “Arab Spring.” Q: In your opinion what is the new world order after the recent London IS attacks and Iran?WE: I would not call it a new world order after the
recent London and Teheran attacks. Rather we are in the midst of the
disintegration of the old world order, an order dominated for the past
two hundred years since the British victory at Waterloo, by first, a
British Empire, and after 1945, by an Anglo-American syndicated empire
based on soft power, control of NATO, control of the IMF and World Bank
and supreme or nearly supreme military power. That order today is bankrupt. The downfall of American power in
my view began in August 1971 when President Nixon tore up the solemn
Bretton Woods Treaty obligations of the United States and shut the
Federal Reserve Gold Discount Window. Since then Wall Street money power
has made a silent coup in transforming the United States that I knew as
a yound man in the 1950s and 1960s, from a more-or-less functioning
democratic republic into an Oligarchy where money controls all, from
Presidents like Obama or Trump to Congressmen who make the laws. That is
a very dangerous state of affairs for Americans and for the entire
world. We may never know who was behind the London or Teheran attacks
but a strong finger of suspicion must point to Washington, or the Mossad
or their Saudi proxy in the case of Teheran. Resort to terrorism to advance national interests by any nation
is a sign not of fundamental strength but of pathetic weakness. Today
our world is in the midst of the most profound paradigm shift, a truly
tectonic geopolitical shift away from a system where one nation dictates
to the entire world, the US version of globalization and New World
Order as the late David Rockefeller proudly called it.That system may
well have died with him and his long-time adviser Brzezinski. Now the nations of Eurasia are building up a new world with
huge investment in economic growth, investment in infrastructure,
high-speed rail links, new deep water ports, all connecting the peoples
of all Eurasia from Beijing to Moscow to Bremen or Rotterdam, to
Teheran, perhaps to Istanbul and beyond. For more than the past two
decades all the USA has offered the world is a foreign policy of wars
and destruction of any and all threats to her power, to her failing
hegemony. Now the world has a chance for the first time in several
centuries to build up and develop our civilization in truly positive
ways. It’s our choice which alternative we take.

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he
holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a
best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online
magazine
“New Eastern Outlook”

DAILY NEWS- Scroll Thru The Latest News

Archbishop Lefebvre

“This Second Vatican Council Reform, since it has issued from Liberalism and from Modernism, is entirely corrupt; it comes from heresy and results in heresy, even if all its acts are not formally heretical. It is thus impossible for any faithful Catholic who is aware of these things to adopt this Reform, or to submit to it in any way at all. To ensure our salvation, the only attitude of fidelity to the Church and to Catholic doctrine, is a categorical refusal to accept the Reform.”

ANNOUNCEMENTS

Archbishop Lefebvre

“And we have the precise conviction that this new rite of Mass expresses a new faith, a faith which is not ours, a faith which is not the Catholic Faith. This New Mass is a symbol, is an expression, is an image of a new faith, of a Modernist faith. ….Now it is evident that the new rite, if I may say so, supposes another conception of the Catholic religion-another religion.”

TRADCATKNIGHT FORUM

FOLLOW TRADCATKNIGHT ON TUMBLR!

TCK Facebook

FOLLOW TRADCATKNIGHT ON PINTEREST

Archbishop Lefebvre

That Conciliar Church is a schismatic Church, because it breaks with the Catholic Church that has always been. It has its new dogmas, its new priesthood, its new institutions, its new worship, all already condemned by the Church in many a document, official and definitive.... The Church that affirms such errors is at once schismatic and heretical. This Conciliar Church is, therefore, not Catholic. To whatever extent Pope, Bishops, priests, or faithful adhere to this new Church, they separate themselves from the Catholic Church...

Fr. Hesse Summary on Vatican II

Vatican II = Heretical & Schismatic

Exposing Vatican II & New Mass, Fr. Villa

Archbishop Lefebvre

“Well, we are not of this religion. We do not accept this new religion. We are of the religion of all time; we are of the Catholic religion. We are not of this 'universal religion' as they call it today-this is not the Catholic religion any more. We are not of this Liberal, Modernist religion which has its own worship, its own priests, its own faith, its own catechisms, its own Bible, the 'ecumenical Bible'-these things we do not accept."

Traditional Quotes & Prayers

The Real 3rd Secret of Fatima

Inlcudes Vatican II and the soon Apostate Church..."...because Fatima is a very apocalyptic message. It says that no matter what happens there are going to be terrible wars, there are going to be diseases, whole nations are going to be wiped out, there are going to be 3 days darkness, there are going to be epidemics that will wipe out whole nations overnight, parts of the earth will be washed away at sea and violent tornadoes and storms. It's not a nice message at all." Fr Malachi Martin

SSPX Marian Corps Donations

Marian Corps-Australasia

Fr. Chazal

Fr. Girouard

Or send a cheque made out to Fr. Patrick Girouard at : P.O.Box 1543, Aldergrove, BC, V4W 2V1, Canada.

St. Marcel Initiative

Or, if you prefer, in the U.S., make your contribution by telephone, toll free: 855-4-S. Marcel (855.476.2723), or internationally, by sending your donation directly to donations@stmarcelinitiative.com via PayPal.

TCK TESTIMONIALS

Eric Gajewski, Founder of DefeatModernism(formerly known as Defeat the Heresies)

Resistance Forum

True Traditionalist Forum

Pope XII: “Suicide Of Altering the Faith In Her Liturgy…..”

"I am worried by the Blessed Virgin's messages to Lucy of Fatima. This persistence of Mary about the dangers which menace the Church is a divine warning against the suicide of altering the Faith, in Her liturgy, Her theology and Her soul. … I hear all around me innovators who wish to dismantle the Sacred Chapel, destroy the universal flame of the Church, reject Her ornaments and make Her feel remorse for Her historical past."A day will come when the civilized world will deny its God, when the Church will doubt as Peter doubted. She will be tempted to believe that man has become God. In our churches, Christians will search in vain for the red lamp where God awaits them. Like Mary Magdalene, weeping before the empty tomb, they will ask, 'Where have they taken Him?'"

ALEXA RANK

Find The Rank Of Any Website

Current Crusaders Online Worldwide (RealTime)

St. Bernard:

Go forth confidently then, you knights, and repel the foes of the cross of Christ with a stalwart heart. Know that neither death nor life can separate you from the love of God which is in Jesus Christ, and in every peril repeat, "Whether we live or whether we die, we are the Lord's." What a glory to return in victory from such a battle! How blessed to die there as a martyr! Rejoice, brave athlete, if you live and conquer in the Lord; but glory and exult even more if you die and join your Lord. Life indeed is a fruitful thing and victory is glorious, but a holy death is more important than either. If they are blessed who die in the Lord, how much more are they who die for the Lord!

How secure, I say, is life when death is anticipated without fear; or rather when it is desired with feeling and embraced with reverence! How holy and secure this knighthood and how entirely free of the double risk run by those men who fight not for Christ! Whenever you go forth, O worldly warrior, you must fear lest the bodily death of your foe should mean your own spiritual death, or lest perhaps your body and soul together should be slain by him.

Indeed, danger or victory for a Christian depends on the dispositions of his heart and not on the fortunes of war. If he fights for a good reason, the issue of his fight can never be evil; and likewise the results can never be considered good if the reason were evil and the intentions perverse. If you happen to be killed while you are seeking only to kill another, you die a murderer. If you succeed, and by your will to overcome and to conquer you perchance kill a man, you live a murderer. Now it will not do to be a murderer, living or dead, victorious or vanquished. What an unhappy victory--to have conquered a man while yielding to vice, and to indulge in an empty glory at his fall when wrath and pride have gotten the better of you!

But what of those who kill neither in the heat of revenge nor in the swelling of pride, but simply in order to save themselves? Even this sort of victory I would not call good, since bodily death is really a lesser evil than spiritual death. The soul need not die when the body does. No, it is the soul which sins that shall die.

The knight of Christ, I say, may strike with confidence and die yet more confidently, for he serves Christ when he strikes, and serves himself when he falls. Neither does he bear the sword in vain, for he is God's minister, for the punishment of evildoers and for the praise of the good. If he kills an evildoer, he is not a mankiller, but, if I may so put it, a killer of evil. He is evidently the avenger of Christ towards evildoers and he is rightly considered a defender of Christians. Should he be killed himself, we know that he has not perished, but has come safely into port.

Once he finds himself in the thick of battle, this knight sets aside his previous gentleness, as if to say, "Do I not hate those who hate you, O Lord; am I not disgusted with your enemies?" These men at once fall violently upon the foe, regarding them as so many sheep. No matter how outnumbered they are, they never regard these as fierce barbarians or as awe-inspiring hordes. Nor do they presume on their own strength, but trust in the Lord of armies to grant them the victory.

.

.

Saint Athanasius

"May God console you! ... What saddens you ... is the fact that others have occupied the churches by violence, while during this time you are on the outside. It is a fact that they have the premises – but you have the Apostolic Faith. They can occupy our churches, but they are outside the true Faith. You remain outside the places of worship, but the Faith dwells within you. Let us consider: what is more important, the place or the Faith?The true Faith, obviously. Who has lost and who has won in the struggle – the one who keeps the premises or the one who keeps the Faith? True, the premises are good when the Apostolic Faith is preached there; they are holy if everything takes place there in a holy way ..."You are the ones who are happy; you who remain within the Church by your Faith, who hold firmly to the foundations of the Faith which has come down to you from Apostolic Tradition. And if an execrable jealousy has tried to shake it on a number of occasions, it has not succeeded. They are the ones who have broken away from it in the present crisis. No one, ever, will prevail against your Faith, beloved Brothers. And we believe that God will give us our churches back some day. "Thus, the more violently they try to occupy the places of worship, the more they separate themselves from the Church. They claim that they represent the Church; but in reality, they are the ones who are expelling themselves from it and going astray. Even if Catholics faithful to Tradition are reduced to a handful, they are the ones who are the true Church of Jesus Christ."