Been a while since I've written a draft, so I decided to use Soulless' random traits table to roll and SCP. I got Eldritch Safety as my 2 words, so I made an Eldritch SCP1 with an ability meant for a type Safety.

Give it some feedback. It's very rough and likely chock full of SPaG errors that I missed.

Footnotes

1. After I bounced the idea off a streamer I know who actually helped me cook the idea.

During testing it was discovered that SCP-XXXX's visual effects are not present in regular camera feeds, causing regular effects of exposure in human subjects. Because of this,

This is something that should really go into the description, it's bogging down the SCProcedures, which should contain directions.

Due to the influence of cognitive bias and views on SCP-XXXX's responses,

Ditto for this.

SCP-XXXX is a dense, sentient mass of organic material, features, or origin.

Er. It's a mass of features? A mass of origins? I'm not sure what this is supposed to mean.

Various accounts by individuals who have viewed SCP without hallucinations

I would establish the 'hallucination' aspect before talking about people unaffected by it, because 'without hallucinations' is the default way most would experience something.

Attempting to damage SCP-XXXX causes the damage inflicted to be deflected back into the object or subject that inflicted it.

This entire 'ability' seems really disjointed from the rest of the work.

likely due to small tendrils underneath the entity.

This seems like a random assumption. It's made of eyes, brain matter and 'bone'. Have they observed these tendrils anywhere else? It's fine to claim they're unsure how it moves.

meaning telepathy

This is a bit of a silly name for the method.

This is caused problems

Has

as the meaning of each response is highly influenced by the receiver's cognitive biases, world views, and mental state.

How do they know this? How was this determined?

A small squad consisting of MTF Eta-10 ("See No Evil"), 2 field agents and 1 D-Class personnel.

This is incomplete. What about them?

MTF Eta-10 personnel and the field agents were inoculated to level 3 cognitohazards.

I don't feel like this sentence is needed, or it'd be better off as a footnote.

After reading the interviews, I htink you'll need to better justify this:

This is caused problems as the meaning of each response is highly influenced by the receiver's cognitive biases, world views, and mental state.

er. If this is supposed to be how it operates, you would have one interview, and multiple people's interpretations of said interview. From the trio of interviews, it just seems like its empathic, and takes on a bit of the personality of the people its interacting with, not that it is saying one thing, and multiple people perceive it differently.

As for the interviews themselves, I did enjoy the exchange in the second, but the first was far too dry (I guess this is intentional) and the final one ends on an odd note with the once-sympathetic 'personality' of the skip being undermined by its cruel taunting. I'd work on further pushing the information it presents in each interview apart; it is a little bland to see more or less the same explanation over and over again.