Jews and Money

Editor Kevin MacDonald has just written about Our Unethical Financial Elite. This is a worthy topic, especially to the extent it openly discusses Jewish involvement.

Two things stand out here: First, the level of deceit and corruption is stunning. Second, the combination of Jews and financial malfeasance has a historical record thousands of years long. In other words, it is part of an old and sordid story, as I related in my essay The Culture of Deceit.

There I wrote how historians, including Paul Johnson (A History of the Jews) and Albert Lindemann (Esau’s Tears: Modern Anti-Semitism and the Rise of the Jews), showed this pattern of Jewish deception and fraud. For example, in 1781 Prussian official Christian Wilhelm von Dohm published a tract claiming, in Johnson’s paraphrase, “The Jews had ‘an exaggerated tendency [to seek] gain in every way, a love of usury.’ These ‘defects’ were aggravated ‘by their self-imposed segregation . . .’ From these followed ‘the breaking of the laws of the state restricting trade, the import and export of prohibited wares, the forgery of money and precious metals.’” In short, von Dohm’s describes traditional Jewish communities as far more resembling a mafia-like group engaged in organized crime than what we think of as a religion.

Lindemann notes that during the 19th century in Eastern Europe there were also persistent complaints about Jewish perjury to help other Jews commit fraud and other crimes. For example, in Russia a neutral observer noted that judges “unanimously declared that not a single lawsuit, criminal or civil, can be properly conducted if the interests of the Jews are involved.” Writing in 1914, American sociologist Edward A. Ross commented on Jewish immigrants to America that “The authorities complain that the East European Hebrews feel no reverence for law as such and are willing to break any ordinance they find in their way. … In the North End of Boston ‘the readiness of the Jews to commit perjury has passed into a proverb.’”

Jewish involvement in financial scandals became a prominent theme of modern anti-Semitism. Johnson writes, “The Union Générale scandal in 1882, the Comptoire d’Escompte scandal in 1889—both involving Jews—were merely curtain-raisers” to a far more massive and complex crime, the Panama Canal scandal, ‘an immense labyrinth of financial manipulation and fraud, with [Jewish] Baron Jacques de Reinach right at the middle of it.’”

Lindemann offers a parallel description of the rise of Jewish power paired with Jewish involvement in major financial scandals. In Germany, Jews “were heavily involved in the get-rich-quick enterprises” of the period of rapid urbanization and industrialization of the 1860s and 70s. “Many highly visible Jews made fortunes in dubious ways . . . Probably the most notorious of these newly rich speculators was Hirsch Strousberg, a Jew involved in Romanian railroad stocks. He was hardly unique in his exploits, but as Peter Pulzer has written, ‘the . . . difference between his and other men’s frauds was that his was more impudent and involved more money.’”

Lindemann offers an account that sounds much like what Americans have been hearing about their own economic woes in the last few years:

In the summer of 1873 the stock markets in New York and Vienna collapsed. By the autumn of that year Germany’s industrial overexpansion and the reckless proliferation of stock companies came to a halt. Jews were closely associated in the popular mind with the stock exchange. Widely accepted images of them as sharp and dishonest businessmen made it all but inevitable that public indignation over the stock market crash would be directed at them. Many small investors, themselves drawn to the prospect of easy gain, lost their savings through fraudulent stocks of questionable business practices in which Jews were frequently involved.

Like Johnson, Lindemann believes that accusations of fraud against many European Jews were not based on mere fantasy. With respect to the Panama Canal scandal of 1888–1892, for instance, Lindemann writes:

Investigation into the activities of the Panama Company revealed widespread bribery of parliamentary officials to assure support of loans to continue work on the Panama Canal, work that had been slowed by endless technical and administrative difficulties. Here was a modern project that involved large sums of French capital and threatened national prestige. The intermediaries between the Panama Company and parliament were almost exclusively Jews, with German names and backgrounds, some of whom tried to blackmail one another . . . .

Thousands of small investors lost their savings in the Panama fiasco. . . . A trial in 1893 was widely believed to be a white-wash. The accused escaped punishment through bribery and behind-the-scenes machinations, or so it was widely believed. The Panama scandal seemed almost designed to confirm the long-standing charges of the French right that the republic was in the clutches of corrupt Jews who were bringing dishonor and disaster to France.

In many cases, the Jewish nexus of the financial scandal includes the idea that Jews involved in financial scandals were being protected by other highly placed Jews: As Lindemann notes, “The belief of anti-Semites in France about Jewish secretiveness was based on a real secretiveness of some highly placed and influential Jews. What anti-Semites suspected was not so much pure fantasy as a malicious if plausible exaggeration, since solid facts were hard to come by.”

Consider, for example, the spectacle of the Wall Street scandals of the 1980s. So much of it was played out on the pages of major newspapers and magazines, so there was no doubt about the identity of the vast majority of culprits—at least for those with eyes to see it.

Stewart’s book is even better, beginning with its title, Den of Thieves. For those whose biblical knowledge is sketchy, the title comes from Matthew 21:12–13, where he recounts

And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves. And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves.

Stewart goes on to chronicle the misdeeds of Ivan Boesky, Martin Siegel, Dennis Levine, and Michael Milken, the mastermind behind it all. Simply by describing all the Jews involved Stewart makes clear that it was a cabal of Jews that pillaged and destroyed some of the most well-known corporations in America at the time by inventing and peddling “junk bonds” as an advance in capitalist operations. Lindemann was careful to include this in his story as well, writing that it had become clear that “the stock market scandals of the mid-to-late 1980s in the United States saw an overwhelming preponderance of Jews — at least ninety percent was a widely accepted figure.”

Jumping ahead to our own day, one of the best accounts of Jewish financial power—and its relationship to other forms of Jewish power—comes in the writing of retired professor James Petras. He has penned series of books starkly exposing “the Zionist Power Configuration” that includes Jewish dominance in Western finance.

Here are some of the observations Petras makes: “Jewish families are among the wealthiest families in the United States” and nearly a third of millionaires and billionaires are Jewish. He also points to similar wealth in Canada, where “over 30 percent of the Canadian Stock Market” is in Jewish hands. Alan Greenspan’s tenure as the Chairman of the Federal Reserve is also linked to Zionist power, since Greenspan was “a long time crony of Wall Street financial interests and promoter of major pro-Israeli investment houses.” (Greenspan was succeeded by coreligionist Ben Shalom Bernanke.)

Debunking the “high school textbook version of American politics,” Petras argues that “the people in key positions in financial, corporate and other business institutions establish the parameters within which the politicians, parties and media discuss ideas. These people constitute a ruling class.” Of the two groups cited by Petras—those in control of financial capital and Zioncons—both are so heavily Jewish as to constitute a single “cabal,” a word which Petras uses liberally throughout both books.

Wall Street supplies many of the “tried and experienced top leaders” who rotate in and out of Washington. At the top of the hierarchy, he finds the big private equity banks and hedge funds. Thus, political leadership descends from Goldman Sachs, Blackstone, the Carlyle Group and others. Goldman Sachs is a historically Jewish firm, Stephen A. Schwarzman is co-founder and current head of the Blackstone Group, while David Rubenstein is co-founder of the Carlyle Group and served in the Carter administration as a domestic policy adviser.

To get just a minor sense of the interconnectedness of Wall Street and Washington Petras is discussing—and to see its heavily Jewish ethnic nexus—note that during the second Clinton Administration, Robert Rubin served as Secretary of the Treasury and was succeeded by Larry Summers (also Jewish). Rubin worked his way to Vice Chairman and Co-Chief Operating Officer of Goldman Sachs prior to becoming the Secretary of the Treasury, and later became the Chairman of Citigroup. He is currently co-chairman of the board of directors on the Council on Foreign Relations.

Petras claims that former President Clinton and his economic advisers backed the regimes that allowed the plunder of Russian wealth. Though relegated to an endnote, he names Andrei Shleifer and Jeffrey Sachs as those involved. What is relevant here is the ethnic connections going to the top of American society that validate Petras’s emphasis on the combined power of Zionism, media and financial control.

Petras’s endnote shows that Harvard paid $26.5 million to settle a suit stemming from various improprieties associated with Harvard professors. As Steve Sailer illustrates, however, it is the Jewish aspect of the entire scandal that stands out. The principals of this scandal were Jews, and they were allegedly protected by fellow Jew, Harvard President Lawrence Summers (who had just finished a stint as Secretary of the Treasury). The upshot of the scandal was that the “reform” of the Russian economy “turned out to be one of the great larceny sprees in all history, and the Harvard boys weren’t all merely naive theoreticians.”

Sailer claims that he had not known about the Jewish identity of the “oligarchs” until he read Yale law professor Amy Chua’s book World on Fire (when Chua correctly noted that six out of the seven of Russia’s wealthiest oligarchs were Jews, her Jewish husband quipped to her, “Just six? So who’s the seventh guy?”). These oligarchs had “paid for Boris Yeltsin’s 1996 re-election in return for the privilege of buying ex-Soviet properties at absurdly low prices (e.g., Mikhail B. Khodorkovsky was put in charge of auctioning off Yukos Oil, which owns about 2% of the world’s oil reserves—he sold it for $159 million to … himself).” Meanwhile, Jews in Russia represented about one percent of the population.

Sailer’s further observations only cast more light on the extent and value of these ethnic connections:

As I’ve said before in the context of exploring how Scooter Libby could serve as a mob lawyer for international gangster Marc Rich on and off for 15 years and then move immediately into the job of chief of staff to the Vice President of the United States, the problem is not that Jews are inherently worse behaved (or better behaved) than any other human group, but that they have achieved for themselves in America in recent years a collective immunity from anything resembling criticism [emphasis added].

Petras makes a similar argument when noting that “Political corruption, not economic efficiency, is the driving force of economic empire-building.” As part of this “unprecedented pillage in Russia (1991-99) brought on by Harvard economist Jeffrey Sachs’s and others’ “shock therapy” in Russia, at least a trillion dollars was transferred to U.S. and EU parties from Russia and Eastern Europe.

For this so interested, here is a brief bibliography of books dealing with the topic of Jews and money:

Finally, there is the promise of a new book on capitalism, with due attention to its Jewish roots, by prolific author E. Michael Jones. His tomeThe Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (order ithere), shows the value in honestly discussing Jewish power and behavior. Keep an eye out for his new book. The topic of Jews and money is forever important.

Jews are more likely 6% (or a bit more) of the US population. They are not the 1 – 2% number that comes from Jewish sources. Simply begin to add up actual population totals in areas like S. California and you will see that they are duping us in this area as well.

JCPA Urges Swiss to Fully Acknowledge Moral As Well As Financial Culpability

New York – December 7, 1999 – The Jewish Council for Public Affairs today expressed gratitude to the Volcker Commission for its landmark report detailing the Swiss Banks’ exploitation of Holocaust-era assets deposited by Jewish victims of the Shoah.

In a statement, Steve Schwarz, the JCPA’s Chair said:

“The findings of the Commission, headed by former Federal Reserve Board Chairman, Paul A. Volcker, validate the $1.25 billion settlement agreement arrived at last year. The report’s findings deal with more than finances. They offer a chilling insight into the behavior of Swiss bank officials who systematically and deliberately thwarted efforts by Jewish families to reclaim assets hidden in Swiss banks by individuals who were lost in the Holocaust. Full accountability for these shameful actions cannot come from a cash settlement alone; they must also take into account the moral failings and the anti-Semitic atmosphere that contributed to these events.”

Mr. Schwarz said that the completion of the Volcker report is another important step in resolving what has been a most arduous process in dealing with the Swiss banks. “The JCPA, along with its member agencies, will continue to support survivors and their heirs as they navigate the complicated and often painful process of restitution.”

(The Jewish Council for Public Affairs is the public affairs arm of the organized Jewish community and serves as the national coordinating and advisory body for the 13 national and 122 local agencies comprising the field of Jewish community relations.)

ZURICH, June 25— Swiss banks, under pressure to speed up the search for accounts left by victims of the Nazis, agreed today to let an independent panel rule on claims to Holocaust-era assets.

The banks also said they would publish a list of pre-1945 dormant accounts on July 23, using the Internet and other means to spread the information internationally so that Holocaust survivors or their heirs can come forward.

An independent international arbitration panel will resolve the claims, according to a joint statement from the Swiss Federal Banking Commission and a joint Swiss-Jewish commission headed by Paul A. Volcker, the former chairman of the United States Federal Reserve. It said the panel would be set up quickly with a majority of international members and a Swiss president, but gave no names. Bankers, regulators and the Volcker commission have been talking since April about finding a way to speed up settlements because of the advanced age of Holocaust survivors.

The Independent Committee of Eminent Persons (CIPE-ICEP) was established on 2 May 1996 by a Memorandum of Understanding between the Swiss Bankers Association, the World Jewish Restitution Organization, and the World Jewish Congress. The Committee was mandated to identify any accounts belonging to victims of Nazi persecution that have remained dormant since the Second World War or that were not made available to the victims or their heirs, and to judge the actions of Swiss banks regarding victims’ accounts.

The Committee’s Chairman is Paul Volcker, former Chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve. The rest of the Committee is made up of five members appointed by Jewish organizations and five members appointed by the Swiss Bankers Association.

Appointed by the SBA :

* Curt Gasteyger
Professor of international relations at the Graduate Institute of International Studies
* Klaus Jacobi
Former Swiss Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs
* Pierre Mengiardi
Former Chairman of the Board of Directors of ATAG Ernst & Young
* René Rhinow
Professor of Law at the University of Basel
* Hans J. Baer
Former Chairman of the Board of Directors of Bank Julius Baer

Appointed by the World Jewish Restitution Organization and the World Jewish Congress :

* Abraham Burg
president of the Jewish Agency in Israel
* Reuben Beraja
president of the Latin American Jewish Congress
* Ronald S. Lauder
vice-president of the World Jewish Congress
* Zvi Barak
president of the World Jewish Restitution Organization
* Israël Singer
secretary general of the World Jewish Congress

Actually I had a talk recently with a friend who is a good example of a demographic, if you will, among us.

He isn’t a TOO reader and only knows about the site from me.
But he’s very receptive and interested with what I have to say when the subject does come up. And he’s noticing a lot more than before.

In any event, he doesn’t run from me like he’s running out of a burning buildilng. I consider that a good thing. Plus, he’s fond of saying that just as there are few of me – ie; people who have taken the time to organize a reasonably coherent explanation for our current dilema that includes, though it not limited to, Jewish influence – there are lots of him – ie; people who’d be interested to hear what we have to say.

It’s like anything else. The examined life, for example (which in a way is connected to all of this). Meaning, the examined life is worth living. In fact it’s vital to shaping a meaningful life.
But you just can not force people to do it.

You can’t force them to do anything. The best we can do is be powers of example. And, of course, do our best to be heard. I realize that that’s a bit of a tight-rope right now. But then, well, that’s where we are today.
Hopefully with time and work that will change.

It can be really hard to tell who is Jewish, for a combination of reasons (crypsis, etc.). I have grown really proficient at making these determinations.
One must also be careful to realize that we are talking about the ORGANIZED Jewish community here. There is a large number of extremely virtuous people in my profession who are of Jewish background.

Timothy Geithner’s wife’s name is Carole Sonnenfeld. She is a Jewess. It doesn’t matter what venue they were married in, nor does it matter that they are “Episcopalians”. Did you know that the Sulzberger family are “Episcopalians” also? Were you aware of that? According to your criteria then, the Sulzberger family aren’t Jews either, because their religion is Christianity.

This argument that Geithner isn’t a Jew because he is an “Episcopalian” is very old. I went through all this stuff a year and a half ago with the clowns on VNN. You’re not saying anything that I haven’t heard before.

And the same thing goes for Paul Volcker. The only reason that you guys are saying that he isn’t Jewish is because his parents attended a “Lutheran” church when he was growing up. Again, I have to ask, what does his family’s religion have to do with his genetics and biology?

Paul Volcker and Timothy Geithner are both genetic Jews. Their religion is quote irrelevant.

All the main candidates for the crucial job of Treasury Secretary, the man who will have to deal with the global financial crisis, are Jewish. They include Robert Rubin and Larry Summers, who both held the job in the Clinton Administration, former president of the Federal Reserve Paul Volcker, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York Tim Geithner and even New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who is mentioned as an outside candidate.

I doubt that Geithner is Jewish, his wedding announcement in the New York Times said he and his wife were married in the Episcopal Church. I also don’t think Volcker is Jewish. I agree as said above, it’s important to be very accurate in these things.

Not that it matters all that much if Geithner or Volcker were Jewish themselves, the financial industry is still a nexus of Jewish power.

There is no proof that either Volcker, or Geithner is Jewish, or of Jewish ethnic background.

With any number of German langauge experts available, and knowing that Germany kept good records, it should be easy to determine if Geithner is of Jewish ancestry. He has published the name of the small town in Germany that his family is from—that’s more than most Americans of German ancestry could do. I’m no Geithner fan, and he does play the Jews flute…LOL.

Volcker, I’m sure could be traced too. But, like Geithner, I have no reason to suspect he is of Jewish ancestry. Although, he does play the Jews flute like a master. LOL.

Pitbullexpress/Dedalus, I’d like to address your apt question here: “So what is it about us that makes us so guillable, defenseless and in some cases, present company (TOO writers and readers) excluded, of course, Clueless!”

Now that IS the $64,000 Question. And I’m afraid I don’t know the answer. Most likely it is a number of factors, all of which have been discussed by the Occidental stable of writers.

Do you recall last year’s series on TOQ called “Why We Write”? It really opened my (aging) eyes. In particular, I thought Andrew Hamilton had a great insight: We tiny group of Jew realists are an aberration. WE see the obvious–and draw proper conclusions, but the vast, vast majority of Whites do not.

Thus I have to conclude that I cannot fully comprehend the mindset of most of my fellow Whites. I just don’t have the massive blind spots they do. And I can’t explain why they have them.

Your analogy about a criminal family next door was very good, and it too leaves us wondering what’s wrong with those who don’t/won’t notice, or are content just to jabber on about it.

Funny, I’ve long had a family analogy of my own.

One day a Jew comes knocking on the door of an average White family–Mom, Dad, three healthy kids. The Jew secretly kills the son, then rapes and pimps out one daughter.

He then frames Dad for the son’s murder and daughter’s rape, and the wife and remaining daughter testify against Dad. In contrast, they protect and fawn over the murderous Jew in their midst.

I see this story as EXACTLY what is happening to us. Meanwhile, this fictional family is oblivious to why their lives have been destroyed.

All the main candidates for the crucial job of Treasury Secretary, the man who will have to deal with the global financial crisis, are Jewish. They include Robert Rubin and Larry Summers, who both held the job in the Clinton Administration, former president of the Federal Reserve Paul Volcker, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York Tim Geithner and even New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who is mentioned as an outside candidate.

I agree, a truly first-rate article by Edmund Connelly; I can’t praise it too highly. Outstanding; should be very widely read and passed around the ‘net. I’ve pasted the whole thing in my own computer documents for “safekeeping.” And the references it contains are a gold mine all by themselves. GREAT PIECE!!!

To ZOG: Volcker isn’t Jewish and neither, apparently, is Geithner. Obviously, when pointing out who is Jewish it’s important not to get it wrong and if you’re not certain, don’t go around affirming it. When Walter Cronkite passed away some months ago I began seeing the claim around the ‘net that he was Jewish, and said to myself, “I didn’t know that but it certainly explains his politics, and maybe even his high position in the broadcast newsmedia — Jewish tribal nepotism.” A few months later I found out he wasn’t Jewish, exactly as I would have thought in the first place. One reason it’s bad to get this wrong is like the reason it’s bad to “cry wolf” — get it wrong enough times, and no one will listen when you get it right. There are other reasons as well, of course.

Edmund I think its worthy to note that Jews are the original “Gangsters” as well as ghetto dwellers.

The Germans created a wealth of articles books and film back in the 1930’s and 40’s showing just how these people came from the ghettos of Eastern Europe ie. Krakow and Warsaw in the 1800’s and early 1900’s.

They came to America moved into the ghettos again in NY Chicago etc and became the orginal “Gansters”. (Gangster is an original American term. ) The Italians especially Sicillians were the “Muscle” for the Jews back in the 1910’s thru 1940’s.

Then in the early 1940’s the Jews moved into so called “legitimate” business Banking Law etc and then took what was still vice gambling prostitution etc and legitimized it and mainstreamed it and called it Las Vegas

Meanwhile the Italians took over the organized crime side ie. Mafia. The Jews still took their cut however. The Blacks moved into the old Jewish neighbourhoods and replaced the Jews and frankly most black are still in the “ghetto” they call the “hood”

A business associate of my who lived in NY for 40 years told me that whenever the Jews left a neighbourhood the blacks were right behind. In many cases the Jews ONLY sold to Blacks. With Jewish pro bono lawyers making the deals for the blacks to own these homes.

The point is you can take the Jew out of the ghetto but you cannot take the ghetto out of the Jew. He is what he is wether he lives in Beverly Hills or Brooklyn. A Jew is a Jew is a Jew

Kudos to Edmund Connelly on another exceptional essay. This is an excellent overview of the real nature of the predatory, alien usurped system that is devouring its seed corn, as well as its milk herd.

All these crooks are being bailed out by the government for hundreds of billions, whereas in his day, J. P. Morgan BAILED OUT the US government!
That’s the difference between WASP sense of custodianship and jewish explotation. Though there have been bad ‘elite’ at least in the old days there was the notion of noblesse oblige…. jews have absolutely no sense of any obligation to gentiles…gentiles owe them.

It would be like listening to a member of a fairly large family talk about a sneaky, diabolical, conniving, devilishly clever, and extraordinarly ruthless and merciless neighbor, and how this evil person was always finding ways to lie to, cheat and steal from, this person’s family.

Perhaps if the crazy old uncle was telling you not to trust the neighbors, he may be on to something.

You know, low IQ minorities can’t understand how the math works on the lottery tickets. Higher IQ whites never really work out the math that their “investment advisers” do for them either, now do they?

I agree – what is wrong with whites? Why are they so trusting/gullible?

Someone suggested MacDonald should cash out whatever retirement he can get from CALPERS before it’s too late. Just become a full time activist/spokesman or whatever.

CALPERS invested all their retirement money in Goldman Sachs. Just consider it for a moment.

Jews are approximately 2% of the United States population. The probability that the heads of this many private and governmental organizations would be Jews is infinitesimally small. This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance. You must ask yourself how such an incredibly small and extremely unrepresentative minority ethnic group that only represents 2% of the American population could so dominate all of these important and influential private and U.S. Government institutions.

Of the nine(9) Goldman Sachs executive officers, seven(7) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 78%. Of the twelve(12) members of the Goldman Sachs board of directors, six(6) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 50%. Of the twenty-nine(29) members of the Goldman Sachs management committee, nineteen(19) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 66%.

Jews are approximately 2% of the United States population. This means that Jews are over-represented among the Goldman Sachs executive officers by a factor of 39 times, or 3,900 percent, over-represented on the Goldman Sachs board of directors by a factor of 25 times, or 2,500 percent, and over-represented on the Goldman Sachs management committee by a factor of 33 times, or 3,300 percent.

This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews among the Goldman Sachs executive officers, board of directors, and management committee cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance. You must ask yourself how such an incredibly small and extremely unrepresentative minority ethnic group that only represents 2% of the American population could so completely dominate the world’s most powerful and influential investment bank.

It boggles the mind that they are not persecuted by the US Govt. for their obvious underrepresentation of negroes and mexicans. Such racism! Perhaps Jesse and his shakedown commitee should be told what is going on in hymietown.

Of the six(6) counselors to U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, five(5) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 83%. Jews are approximately 2% of the United States population. This means that Jews are over-represented among the counselors to U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner by a factor of 41.5 times, or 4,150 percent. This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews among the counselors to U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance. You must ask yourself how such an incredibly small and extremely unrepresentative minority ethnic group that only represents 2% of the American population could so completely dominate the inner advisory circle of U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.

Of the eleven(11) top officials in the U.S. Treasury Department, six(6) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 55%. Jews are approximately 2% of the United States population. This means that Jews are over-represented among the top officials of the U.S. Treasury Department by a factor of 27.5 times, or 2,750 percent. This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews among the top officials of the U.S. Treasury Department cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance. You must ask yourself how such an incredibly small and extremely unrepresentative minority ethnic group that only represents 2% of the American population could so completely dominate the highest levels of the U.S. Treasury Department.

Of the five(5) members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, three(3) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 60%. Of the twelve(12) Federal Reserve District Bank presidents, eight(8) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 67%. Jews are approximately 2% of the United States population. This means that Jews are over-represented on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors by a factor of 30 times, or 3,000 percent, and over-represented among the Federal Reserve District Bank presidents by a factor of 33.5 times, or 3,350 percent.

This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews among the members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Reserve District Bank presidents cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance. You must ask yourself how such an incredibly small and extremely unrepresentative minority ethnic group that only represents 2% of the American population could so completely dominate the U.S. Federal Reserve System.

For the past forty(40) years, every Chairman of the Federal Reserve System has been a Jew, except for a brief period of seventeen(17) months. Here are the Chairmen of the Federal Reserve System since 1970.

Arthur Frank Burns(Jew)
term: February 1, 1970 – January 31, 1978

George William Miller(White European)
term: March 8, 1978 – August 6, 1979

Paul Adolph Volcker(Jew)
term: August 6, 1979 – August 11, 1987

Alan C. Greenspan(Jew)
term: August 11, 1987 – January 31, 2006

Ben Shalom Bernanke(Jew)
term: February 1, 2006 – present

Jews are approximately 2% of the United States population. The probability that almost every Chairman of the Federal Reserve System since 1970 would be a Jew is infinitesimally small. This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews among the Chairmen of the Federal Reserve System cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance. You must ask yourself how such an incredibly small and extremely unrepresentative minority ethnic group that only represents 2% of the American population could so dominate the chairmanship of the Federal Reserve System.

Once again, another well-written and very interesting article that sadly fails to draw the conclusion that seems to be oozing out of it from top to bottom, ie;

So what is it about us that makes us so guillable, defenseless and in some cases, present company (TOO writers and readers) excluded, of course, Clueless!

It would be like listening to a member of a fairly large family talk about a sneaky, diabolical, conniving, devilishly clever, and extraordinarly ruthless and merciless neighbor, and how this evil person was always finding ways to lie to, cheat and steal from, this person’s family.

Naturally you would wonder why this person’s family doesn’t get organized and work together to free themselves from this awful menace.

You might get an answer like, “Well yes, you’re right. In fact, I mentioned that in a paper once. But anyway, did I tell you the latest?
Well, apparently my evil neighbor has now…….”

and on and on.

Or, maybe something along the lines of, “Yes, you’re right. I have been saying the same thing and doing my best to bring this to the attention of my family.”

“Yes”, the other person might say, “and what was their response?”

“Well, they looked at me like I was crazy and said that I had a peculiar problem when it comes to our neighbor.”

To which any sensible person would shift his attention away from the evil neighbor and onto the incredible nincompoops who can not even recognize what is right in front of them, and the one who can just talks about it. Even with all of the courage in the world it would be suicide for him to actually Do anything about it. So what else is he supposed to do?

This is not at all an unfair, or inaccurate, description of our relationship to the hostile elite today.

In a post at TOQ Online, I touched on at least one contributing factor to help us understand the historical roots of our susceptibility and relative powerlessness in relation to the hostile elite.