We're not going away. We're exposing what truly happened the night of October 1, 2017 in Las Vegas, Nevada. We know, and it's time the rest of you know. Paddock didn't do it. The proof is out there, and the real official story has yet to be heard.

The evidence against the official story is astounding, and the proof that vindicates Stephen Paddock comes from SWAT body camera footage, high definition pictures of the Mandalay Bay after the attack, and a video from a man named Chris.

This man named Chris live streamed his experience after the attack, and he was just sharing the information he had and what he knew happened earlier that night. Please note that this stream occurred, according to the YouTube description, at 12:16AM Las Vegas time on the night of the attack. The attack itself has been over for about 2 hours.

According to Chris's live stream, more events happened 2 hours after the attack had ended. The video will be posted below, but lets focus on some snippets from the video.

These series of images we'll show is at around 6:55 in the video, what you're about to see looks like an explosion, or some sort of light anomaly from what looks to be the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay, and towards the area where Paddock's suite was.

Large light anomaly is then seen, could this be an explosion in 32-135?

The light anomaly fizzles out in the location of what looks like room 32-134.

Let's post the video here, and you can watch and decide for yourself. You'll want to start the video at around 6:45, but feel free to start it and let Chris explain what's going on at first. Watch from 6:45, then at 6:55 you'll see the anomaly. Again this video is per Las Vegas Shooting Archive on YouTube:

Throughout the video Chris hears several booms and thuds in the distance, and he's unable to locate their source. He also shares some information from people he knew at the concert and at Mandalay Bay. Let's take a look at some of those instances here.

At about 25:30 he shares information from someone he knew at the Route 91 Harvest Festival, and that person says the following: "It felt like it was coming from above, not all around.", when talking about the shooting.

Around 37:38, Chris hears more booms in the distance and says "You hear that again, what is all those, there's like, I'm not sure what these big banging sounds are, I don't see any fireworks or anything."

At about 54:40 Chris hears more loud sounds in the distance, saying "What is this loud sound? Guys, there's massive loud sounds!"

Around 56:00 Chris says, "Why would there be M-80 dynamite sounds?"

Then at about 57:51 Chris says, "We keep hearing these big massive thumping sounds right outside Mandalay Bay. There's been several of them over and over."

At 1:04:15 a security guard comes to where Chris is, and tells them to leave. Chris tries to explain why he's up there and why he believes it's not safe for him to leave, but the security guard insists he does, and kicks them out.

Do you really think Stephen Paddock did this all on his own? The body camera footage from the SWAT team that breached Paddock's room shows that no windows in Paddock's room were broken. SWAT can be heard twice saying, "We do not have a broken window." and "We have curtains open on a window, that's not broken." The latter, is the window that Stephen paddock would have been shooting out of, the window next to the pillar in that room.

In that SWAT body camera footage, you hear nothing about evidence, you hear nothing about broken glass, expended shell casings, hell not even Paddock's weapons.

Could Chris's live stream be the smoking gun footage? Did Chris happen to catch police or FBI blowing the windows in Paddock's suite? What would you do if you were the police or FBI? You just wasted all that time zeroing in on who you were sure was the suspect, only to find out that suspect could have never of shot from his room. By then, all other suspects more than likely would have fled the area. Did they?

Another part of the "official story" has recently been blown away, they told you Paddock killed himself, right? He didn't. Not only does the actual picture of Paddock disprove a suicide (fresh blood, position of blood, and dry blood around a hole on Paddock's chest), but more police body camera footage seems to disprove that story.

The video below was released by Mr. Burgandy on YouTube, it shows a Las Vegas Police officer saying "suspect's down in Mandalay Bay 32nd floor, SWAT O.I.S (Officer Involved Shooting)".

It couldn't be more clear, the officer says, reading from a group message, that the suspect is down on the 32nd floor from an office involved shooting. Why would they lie after the fact?

Here is a little more proof that Paddock was killed by SWAT, the video below from UFO Hunter UK, shows the breaching of Paddock's room. In this body camera footage, you hear the initial blast from the breach, then another boom which sounds like a gun shot.

Strange huh? This video also shows some strangeness of officer's going into 32-134.

Still think Paddock did it? Still think there wasn't more people involved? Still think the windows were broken before SWAT breached Paddock's room? The evidence says your wrong. This evidence is all from official body camera footage, dispatch recordings, witness reports, 911 calls, police reports, and eyewitness accounts. This isn't a conspiracy, folks, this is a real cover-up.

Below are some excerpts from dispatch recordings via https://archive.org/details/Batch8-911-Calls/171001003519_(1175).wma. They show how police believed there were multiple shooters and that the shooters were using automatic weapons, and specifically belt-fed automatic weapons.

There are also excerpts that show police had other suspects in custody that night.

Paddock didn't kill all those people. He may have been involved in some way, but he did not fire shots from his room. The windows were not broken prior to SWAT breaching Paddock's room. Look to the sky that night, helicopters can be seen all around while shooting is going on, and guess what, they were never supposed to be there.

Witness reports, 911 calls, and dispatch logs all point to multiple shooters, either in the air or on the ground. So where'd they go? Maybe John Cullen of John E Hoover​ can help you out:

Well if you've been watching the news this afternoon, you'd think President Trump just committed an act of treason. Did he? Is Venus a cold planet? President Trump did not commit an act of treason, do not believe the hysteria being pushed.

President Trump is a deal maker and a damn good negotiator, so why would he insult and bully Vladimir Putin to his face? It's almost the same as when the other side was furious President Trump didn't call out and bully Kim Jong Un during the Singapore summit.

You simply can't bully and insult your way to a deal or peace, you must use your leverage and build a professional, business, and personal relationship. That's what President Trump does best.

Did Russia meddle in the 2016 election? The US intel agencies think so, but for what purpose? They didn't influence or change anything, so is it any different than China or Iran doing the same thing? Why would Russia risk more sanctions and other geopolitical problems just to obtain and steal information on US voters and candidates?

President Trump said this today, and it's a very powerful statement, one that the democrats and media hated to hear: "I would rather take political risks in pursuit of peace than risk peace in pursuit of politics.".

The United States and Russia have no reason to be in conflict anymore. The USSR is gone, and Putin knows it ain't coming back. Putin also understands the US has a bigger economy and better military, so what good does conflict serve Russia and Putin?

It would be in the United States and Russia's best interest to get a long, trade, and be allies.

China is the real threat on this planet. China has a much larger economy and a more powerful military than Russia does, and a lot more sophisticated cyber warfare branch than Russia does. God forbid if China tried starting a war or went on an attack, wouldn't you want Russia on the side of the good guys? Russia teaming up with China would be the worst thing ever for the United States, and I think President Trump knows that, and that's why he wants Russia on our side.

No one seemed to care when Barack Obama told the Russians he'd "have more flexibility" after his election. No one seemed to care when Chuck Schumer (D-NY) met and had fun with Vlaidmir Putin, and no one cared when former CIA chief John Brennan voted for the communist party in the 1970s.

No matter what President Trump does, the opposition will always play it as bad news and "treason".

Do you think for one minute Putin would admit to meddling in our election? If he did, what do you want to do about it? WW3, over a damn election? President Trump is mature enough to recognize it, and is driving straight through all the flak and political risks to have a better relationship with Russia, and get them on our side.

A lot can be gained in a US-Russia relationship, in terms of trade and military power. President Trump views Putin as a competitor, and Russia as a competitor of the US, which rings true.

Don't get lost in all the media and democrat hysteria, there is nothing to worry about. President Trump knows what he's doing, and he is smart enough to know, you don't insult or bully someone you're trying to broker a peace deal with.

President Trump didn't flat out agree with Putin's denial, he simply said Putin made a strong denial of the meddling claims, and President Trump acknowledged the US intel about 2016 Russian meddling. Here's the thing, the DNC server has not been reviewed by the FBI, so how can anyone know for sure who really breached it or hacked it?

People like Julian Assange and Kim Dotcom who claim to know who breached the server, say it was't Russia. Julian and Kim both have been asking to come forward to testify to and show their evidence, and what they say happened, is someone simply used a flash drive and copied files from that server over to an external drive. No hack no nothing. Maybe that's why the DNC server was never looked at? The deep state and democrats don't want the real truth coming? I guess only time will tell.

Marilou Danley, the girlfriend of alleged Las Vegas Massacre shooter Stephen Paddock, has not been talked about, seen, or heard from in months. Where is she?

There's a lot of suspicious things about Marilou Danley. One, being Stephen Paddock's girlfriend, two is her player's card was found in Paddock's suite, and three her fingerprints were found on ammunition.

Per the official story Marilou was no where to be found the night of the shooting, she was in the Philippines so we've heard. Now that story kind of adds up because, Paddock wired $100,000 to an account in the Philippines a week before the shooting,per NBC News.

However, according to The Las Vegas Review-Journal, radio transmissions have been released where officers considered Marilou "armed and dangerours". There were three radio transmissions regarding her, after the initial finding of her player's card in Paddock's suite.

The three transmissions regarding Marilou occurred at 1:37AM, 1:47AM, and 1:59AM on the night of the shooting. They initially believed Marilou was in a Hyundai Tuscon with Nevada plates, and was to be considered "armed and dangerous". Later on officers claimed this was a false alarm.

We know this much, per The Gateway Pundit, there were two people in Paddock's suite at one point before the shooting. The Gateway Pundit released a photo of a receipt showing room service for two ordered to 32-135 of the Mandalay Bay. See here:

Was that dinner for two for Paddock and Marilou, or Paddock and someone else? Women's clothing was found in Paddock's suite, and a shopping bag from a women's clothing store was found in Paddock's van. That shopping bag is from a store called ANGL, which is a clothing store for women's dresses and other "trendy clothing". See here:

Interesting they blacked out the room number for those 3 females, if those 3 females weren't involved, why black out the room number? We do know from police body cam footage in Paddock's suite, that identification for a "Jenna Perdue" was found. So we have Marilou Danley and Jenna Perdue identifications being found in Paddock's suite.

Was Marilou there the day of the shooting? Did she get on a plane to flee the country in hopes of never being found or questioned, only to be caught? How come after Marilou's questioning, and the evidence found connecting her to Stephen Paddock's alleged plan, nothing has been brought forth about her involvement. She hasn't been put on any trials or anything.

Who were the other women that were in Paddock's room? Friends of Marilou? Hookers? More girlfriends of Paddock himself?

Could it be Paddock was in on something else, gun running or a patsy, and Marilou was debreifed and told to be hush-hush about it in exchange for immunity? Remember, windows in Paddock's room 32-135 were never broken prior to officer's breaching the room. Pulsar broke that down in two stories:

Where are you Marilou? Why don't we know more about your involvement with this? Why was your player's card in Paddock's suite, while you were in the Philippines? I guess we're going to have to find out one way or another.

It was a heated day on Capitol Hill, disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok testified in front of Congress about his bias and handling of the Trump investigation.

He was grilled by the GOP congressmen, and of course, stuck up for by the Democrat congressmen. At times the Republicans and Democrats were going at each other.

Peter Strzok was very careful in how he answered every question. At times, he couldn't answer simple questions because he'd claim the FBI wouldn't allow him, but there was several times he'd say that, and the FBI would come back and say he was allowed to answer whatever question it was.

It's funny, because Strzok has claimed, and claimed many times today, that he was not biased and that bias did not influence his investigation. His text messages and personal beliefs completely contradict that. Whenever members of Congress would hammer him on bias, that's when Strzok would get the most defensive and visibly irritated.

Let's watch a few videos from today shall we.

First we'll start off with the complete exchange between Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) and Peter Strzok, and at the end is where you'll see Strzok get very defensive and irritated about his clear bias. This video is per C-SPAN:

Gowdy really let Strzok have it, and really hit the nail on the head. Strzok really didn't have a defense, but did his best to answer as carefully as possible.

To show Strzok's true bias, and to make him actually read that bias Congress, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) made Strzok read his clearly biased text messages, some of which Strzok said he couldn't recall writing or sending.

The man clearly had bias, and to tell his mistress, and co-worker, Lisa Page that "We'll stop it" when talking about Trump becoming President is astounding. Strzok then sits there in front of Congress and clearly lies about not having any bias.

That exchange really upset the Democrats, but it needed to be said, and someone besides Trey Gowdy and Jim Jordan had to put Strzok in his place.

Listen when you're the lead FBI investigator, investigating then candidate and nominee Trump, and then President Trump, and you're texting with another FBI investigator about stopping Trump, impeaching Trump, and getting him to resign, you have bias.

After all these text messages came out months ago, Mueller kicked Strzok off the investigation, but Strzok said that his texts had nothing to do with it, but declined to say why he really was kicked off.

Strzok was also in charge of the Hillary Clinton investigation as well. Strzok is the one who changed the wording. Per CBS News, Strzok changed it from "grossly negligent", which would have almost ensured charges to be filed against Clinton, to "extremely careless" which gave Clinton a slap on the wrist. Comey confirmed that, but Strzok said he did not recall changing that language. How funny.

Listen the FBI as a whole aren't bad people, they do great things for this nation, but those in Washington D.C, and those running these investigations into Clinton and Trump, are extremely biased and corrupt. They clearly do not and never did like President Trump, but for some reason that's not big deal to them or the Democrats in this country.

Something has to give here. Strzok's mistress, and co-worker, Lisa Page failed to appear in front of Congress this week. Page claimed she didn't have all the documents needed to answer questions, but it doesn't seem like she wants to play ball at all. It feels like Page will crack under pressure, and she is doing all she can to delay the hearings and weasel her way through it.

The United States of America and her people deserve better, and they deserve honest answers. The house of cards is slowly but surely falling down. It's only a matter of time until someone folds, or evidence comes out where no one can defend against it.

President Trump is right, this is a total witch hunt. These people in the FBI, the Democrats, and Hillary Clinton herself thought they'd win in 2016 and none of this would see the light of day, well they failed, and Donald J. Trump is president, and we're seeing all this corruption come to light.

As Johnny Cash said in "God's Gonna Cut You Down", "You may throw your rock and hide your hand, working in the dark against your fellow man, but as sure as God made black and white, what's done in the dark will be brought to the light...". You're damn right John, God rest your soul.

In Brussels today, President Trump and other NATO leaders came to town for a summit. President Trump dominated the meeting.

President Trump, from the time he was a candidate and all the way up to today, has been a hawk on NATO. President Trump specifically goes after the defense spending of other countries. President Trump has time and time again poked at the NATO nations on their defense spending.

Check this graph out detailing the defense spending of each country in NATO, perZeroHedge:

How is that only five, yes five, out of the 28 meet the requirement of 2%? Out of all countries involved, how is Greece second to the US? The UK falls in third, Estonia is fourth, and Poland is fifth.

Estonia and Poland have great reason to meet the requirement since they'd be the most threatened by Russia. So what about the other nations? That's what President Trump set out to answer today.

President Trump really went after Germany, because Germany pays very little in defense, but make billion dollar deals with Russia.

President Trump does have a point. Germany is barely spending any money on NATO, while making billion dollar deals with the country NATO was set up to defend against.

Per Yahoo!, President Trump asked all NATO leaders to increase their defense spending to 4% to match the US's defense spending.

It really isn't fair that the United States is spending the most, more than twice as much to protect Europe from Russia. The same countries who claim they're against Russia, or think President Trump has Russian ties, make deals with Russia and barely spend any money to defend against Russia. It's a joke.

President Trump knows it's not in the US's best interest to cut defense spending, but he knows it's not in the US's best interest to keep footing the majority of NATO's bill. America First.

Europe thinks they can play President Trump, but with the on-going trade disputes, and spending the most by far in NATO, Trump has all the leverage. The EU should play ball. Why should the US protect an entire continent from one nation, if that entire continent isn't going to contribute their fair share?

The NATO leaders talked a big game before the meeting, but President Trump clearly won the day.

Still think Paddock did it on his own, huh? Still think all victims of the Las Vegas Shooting were shot and killed from room 32-135 of the Mandalay Bay, huh? Still believe the official story, huh?

The amount of evidence against the official story is outstanding. One single body camera on one of Las Vegas's finest blows the official story out of the water.

Now if you have read the part 1 of this story, you'd be up to speed, and have a pretty good idea on what really happened that night. You'd see, and if watched John E. Hoover's videos and read Intellihub, that no windows were ever broken prior to Las Vegas Police breaching Paddock's Mandalay Bay suite.

Let's break this down one more time. You're part of the Las Vegas Police strike team tasked with breaching Paddock's suite and taking down the shooter. You manage to get to the room, and boom, you breach the room. Next thing you know, Paddock is on the ground dead, guns and ammo everywhere, and you think you accomplished the objective.

So you start sweeping the room gathering evidence and checking for clues, and you then notice that no windows in Paddock's room are broken. An officer, whose name from what we believe is Corey, says these words: "We do not have a broken window." and "Standby we have curtains open on a window that's not broken.". Another officer can be heard saying, "It's not! It's not! It's not! Corey, it's not, no it's not.".

This "Corey" fella, whose name can be heard multiple times on the officer's body camera, is no where to be found on the preliminary FIT report. So who was this "Corey" fella, who stated more than once that windows are not broken? John Cullen of John E. Hoover on YouTube can help you understand:

Is Corey a "government fixer"? Why wouldn't he be on any reports regarding the breaching and sweeping of Paddock's suite, but can clearly be heard on an officer's body cam?

Back to the windows. Some may say, well that body cam footage doesn't show all the windows in Paddock's suite. Correct, but it shows the one, and the only one that counts.

Before an officer exclaims to Corey that the window is not broken, they tell an officer to check the window by the pillar. The window by the pillar is the window that was broken, and its image is now etched into the official story. In Intellihub's initial story on this, and John E Hoover's initial video on this, we see that the window is not broken, and Corey and another officer confirm that window is not broken.

Here is another John E Hoover video on this in case you need a refresher:

Now let's pivot for a moment, say the window was broken, why would an officer walk over to the window next to the pillar and stand on broken glass and shell casings? Wouldn't you want to be more careful with evidence, aren't officers and investigators supposed to leave evidence undisturbed until the investigation at the scene is concluded? Why would an officer carelessly walk on and over evidence?

Like the evidence pictured here at that exact same window:

It's almost like that window was never broken prior to breaching, and they were simply checking to see if it was broken because the curtain was in a position like it was being looked out of or moved. The officer moved the curtain to find that the window was not broken, and officer Corey confirms that.

Compare these two photographs, one with the broken windows taken the day after the massacre, and the other taken the night of the massacre. Notice anything?

Yes, the one on the right may be a little small. Click to enlarge it, and look to where 32-135 should be, do you see any indication that windows are broken? You do not see any lights at all, and if windows were broken, the lights from those rooms would be easily noticeable since Mandalay's windows are tinted.

For the record, the picture on the right was taken after the shooting. Check the source for the full picture.

Why does it seem like we're being lied to? Is it because we are? Is it because Las Vegas Police breached Paddock's room, Paddock is dead, guns everywhere, ammo everywhere, but no broken windows? No broken windows means Paddock couldn't have been the shooter.

You just wasted all your time zeroing in on Paddock to take him down, sure he is the main suspect, just to find out he wasn't. What would you do? A true independent and moral person would tell the truth, so were the officer's pressured? Is the deep state involved here?

Also, the silence after the officers confirm there is no broken windows is very telling. You can tell they're shocked and not sure what to do.

In one of the John E Hoover videos, when the officers breach Paddock's room, you hear a bang then "nice shot". Nice shot? I thought Paddock killed himself? More and more evidence shows that officer's, and Jesus Campos, engaged Paddock. Here's a tweet from @intellihubnews that shows this:

The blood coming from Paddock's head doesn't add up with the suicide, and look at his chest, that looks like a hole with blood around it. It looks dry as the blood coming from his head looks very fresh, also there isn't much blood coming from his head after a gunshot wound. Per the body cam footage, they didn't take photos that quickly.

Also, how is that rifle over his left leg? Kind of looks placed, don't it? I mean was he standing with his foot underneath the bi-pod area when he was killed? Even if that was the case, wouldn't the rifle have moved when he fell to the ground?

So what's going on here? Why are there still more questions than answers 9 months later?

If Paddock wasn't the shooter, which he couldn't have been since the windows weren't broken, then who was? Answer, look in the sky on the videos that night. Answer, listen to the 911 calls and read the witness reports talking about multiple shooters up and down the Las Vegas strip.

Did the authorities ​falsify evidence? If so, they could be in some serious trouble. We're gathering the proof, but don't hold your breath on prosecution.​
​See you don't hear this stuff from the Las Vegas Police, Clark County Sheriff, or the FBI. They fed you their "official story" and have fought tooth and nail not to let any information out, but they failed. Regular citizens have blown the top off this investigation and the truth is coming out. We can't be stopped.

One day the real story will be brought to the masses, but sadly, that day seems far away. We're doing our part, now do your part and share this and any other Las Vegas Shooting video/story you can find.

The windows in Paddock's suite were not broken, who was the shooter(s)? They were in the sky and on the ground. Paddock gave them the cover to flee the scene.

Two years ago on July 10, 2016, Seth Rich was shot in the back in Washington D.C. Seth Rich, who at the time was a DNC staffer, was murdered around 4:15AM in what police called a "botched robbery".

Since Seth's murder, there have been many theories on who killed him and why. The leading theory, other than the "official story", is Seth Rich was the Wikileaks source that was providing DNC and Clinton emails to Wikileaks.

An Infowars story from 2017 cited a detective named Rod Wheeler who has been investigating this case, and was hired by the family. Wheeler appeared on Fox News'sHannity and said the following: "I called the police department back in March." "I didn't hear anything for 2-3 days." "The police department did not call me back because someone, a high-ranking official at the DNC-check this out- a high ranking official at the DNC-when I called the police department, they got that information and called the Rich family wanting to know, why was I snooping around?".

​Wheeler also said: "We actually have a statement from the FBI telling us to 'contact the D.C Police- the D.C Police says, 'Contact the FBI'".

Wheeler would then go on to say that a "very credible" federal investigator told him that he had seen Seth Rich's computer and case file, he revealed that Rich had been emailing Wikileaks.

Wheeler mentioned that the D.C Police and the FBI would not tell him where Seth Rich's computer is. Wheeler would then say these bombshell words, "Well perhaps there were some email communications between Seth Rich and Wikileaks".

Now in that same Infowarsarticle, it is mentioned that the Rich family issued a statement against Wheeler and his words. The family stated that Wheeler's claims were "unsubstantiated", and he was hired and paid for by a third party. At the end of the day though, he is still a detective and was still hired to investigate this murder.

Over the past couple of years this story really fizzled out. The mainstream media did what the do best, which is create hysteria for a story or completely ignore a story, and they have completely ignored this since 2016. Alternative media have been the ones keeping this story alive, and giving the public some updates.

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has been a key figure in the Seth Rich investigation. Assange has suggested multiple times that Rich may have been the source behind the DNC leaks. He made the first, and pretty convincing, suggestion in August 2016 on a Dutch TV program Nieuwsuur​:

Many have been calling on President Trump to pardon Assange, and bring him the US for information in exchange for asylum. One piece of information being on Seth Rich.

Now why hasn't President Trump? More than likely pressured by deep state and congressional members, check this out from the infamous QAnon​ via @qanon76 on Twitter:

Qanon is suggesting that Julian Assange (JA) or the DNC server, that has been no where to be found, equals the truth on Seth Rich (SR). Notice that tweet though, Democratic senators, and democratic senators only, demanded that Julian Assange's asylum in the US be revoked. How coincidental?

Now who is Qanon? Nobody knows for sure, but if you're on Twitter then you've probably seen #Qanon, #Q, or have seen @qanon76 popping up on your timeline. Qanon is someone or multiple people pushing out information in short bursts using abbreviations and not much detail. It's almost like a puzzle, and you have to have an understanding for what is being talked about to really understand Q's information bursts.

Here is a little more from Qanon​:

"Server unlocked SR", "MS_13 (2 187'd nearby) phones unlock command & control". Did Podesta or someone from the DNC know Seth Rich was taking files from the DNC and sending them to Wikileaks? When caught, did someone in the DNC hire two MS 13 gang members to murder Seth? Remember Seth was killed, but not robbed. Did someone from DNC or gov't then pop the MS 13 gang members to cover up the tracks?

​See, these Qanon posts are like a puzzle. They really make you ask questions and think into it.

Per The Daily Mail, Seth Rich was out drinking heavily until about 1:45AM (officially), but could have been out as late as 2:30AM at another bar. From 2:30-4:15AM, no one knows what Seth was doing, only known to be on his way home at the time he was shot.

Did Seth meet with someone or others after the bar? Was he told he was caught, or maybe asked about the situation? After he left, the hit was called in? Why is the case shrouded in secrecy?

I understand the murder happened very late at night and no one was really in sight, but cameras are everywhere around D.C., there has to be some hard evidence here. Shell casings, bullets, ballistic investigation? This case, much like the Vegas Shooting case, should not be shrouded in so much secrecy and mystery, family and citizens deserve more.

The Gateway Pundit reported yesterday, that Jack Burkman, a Washington-based attorney, toldThe Gateway Pundit that a witness has conclusive evidence that'll prove two people murdered Seth Rich. Burkman, according to the article, is workng with a private investigation team to solve the Seth Rich murder case. Burkman stated that they have a witness who can ID Seth's two killers.

Remember Qanon? "MS_13 (2 187'd nearby)". Burkman suggests though, that the killers may have been part of DEA and ATF. Associates to murder? DEA and ATF are agencies that would deal with MS 13. Spooky nevertheless .

Burkman held a press conference today regarding this, and not a lot was said, no names were said, but simply backs up the claims Burkman made to The Gateway Pundit.

The witness is in fear for their life, and it seems to be for good reason. This is just a very spooky and mysterious situation overall.

Was it really a DNC assassination? Why is so much information being held by the District and by the federal government? So much basic information has not been given to the public. Is the family being pressured? Maybe they just want privacy, I mean they did lose a son.

This just stinks to high heaven, and it's a shame we're still talking about this two years later. How much longer? Alternative media will continue to push for information, and Qanon seems to be doing its job.

5G, the fifth generation of wireless technology. What makes it better than 4G LTE, do we really need 5G, and what about the health risks of this new technology?

4G LTE (Long Term Evolution) has been the upgraded version of 4G for a while now, 4G LTE was pretty much the first "version" of 5G. 4G LTE offers faster speeds and better security than 4G.

Per PCMag, 5G's networks will consist of small cells and could be as small as home routers. According to that article, 5G networks should not consist of large towers. The idea is, the more cells you have the more data you can get on the network.

What's worse, large cell towers here and there, or a small area with multiple cells closer to each other?

AT&T claims they're going to be the first ones to really implement this technology and offer it to their customers. According to PCMag, they believe AT&T will roll out 5G using millimeter wave technology, which can't reach very far, but is highly effective at the distances it can reach. This is why 5G networks will be placed closed to each other, and to be extremely effective and efficient, there will have to be a lot of these small cell networks around.

According to Newsmax, 5G networks will be put onto street lights, buildings, signs, pretty much anywhere possible. There still needs to be infrastructure to support all of this, but that's only half the battle of implementing 5G. ISPs like AT&T have to go not only the states, but the counties and cities, they plan to implement 5G in.

It's like fiber networks, you need to obtain approval from not just the feds and the states, but localities too.

So, how do you feel about small cell 5G networks being placed literally all over town? That's the plan here. There will no doubt be a spike in radiation in the areas where they'll implement these networks, that's just a given. If you have so many of these small cell networks in one area, radiation will increase due to the concentration of these small cell networks.

The industry wants to put this technology everywhere; from homes, to cars, to offices, to schools, to beaches, everywhere. The FCC certainly isn't standing in the way.

The Los Angeles Times ran a story on the health hazards of 5G technology. In that story, they said male rats had a slight increase of tumor growths. These rats were involved in a long term high radiation test, but it shows the risks are there. 5G will expose humans to a significant increase in radiation, especially if it's implemented in every setting of human life, like the industry plans.

In that same Los Angeles Times article, Leeka Kheifets, a epidemiology professor at UCLA, said "I don't think it's clear that there are health risks, but it's also not clear that there are no health risks."

Honestly, 5G could have been designed better, and to be honest, there isn't anything wrong with 4G LTE. 4G LTE is fast enough, the only real perk of 5G is you'll be able to use more data at a slightly faster speed than 4G LTE. Ask yourself, do you really need that? Wireless connection speed is pretty darn fast as it is.

Also, with these small cell networks everywhere, it can greatly increase the risk of cyber attacks and hacking. A bad actor could take out an entire city's network by hacking into or taking out a group of these small cell networks, and they way there are to be implemented, it won't take as much effort as a 4G network.

Alex Jones has been very passionate about noting the health hazards and other risks associated with 5G networks. He has been long time friends with Dr. Edward Group. Group founded the Global Healing Center. Group himself is warning about 5G technology, and Alex had him on Infowars to talk about it:

Infowars has really been leading the charge on warning about the health risks associated with 5G networks. Dr. Group is also on board with Alex and Infowars on the potential health risks of 5G. This isn't some wacky conspiracy folks, it's real.

Sadly, the wireless industry is too far invested in this 5G technology for it be stopped or reconsidered. The industry wants it, the government wants it, businesses want it, but do average citizens want it? It doesn't seem to be widely talked about by regular folks, that's for sure.

Hopefully the wireless industry and government recognizes these health risks and does reconsider the technology it self, but don't hold your breath on it. Big cities and the government will get it first, the rural areas will be the last to get it more than likely. Businesses, cars, and planes though? No matter where you live, this technology will find you.

Tonight we have a special edition of Headlines of the Day on Monday, July 9, 2018. This evening Pulsar is diving in to President Trump's Supreme Court pick.

Fox News reported earlier today, around 3:00PM EST, that President Trump has chosen his Supreme Court nominee. President Trump had narrowed it down to four finalists:

Thomas Hardiman

Amy Coney Barrett

Brett Kavanaugh

Raymond Kethledge

Pulsar ran a poll on Twitter today asking the folks who they think President Trump selected. Results are as follows:

Amy Coney Barrett won that poll with ease.

Well the wait is over, and President Trump has chosen Brett Kavanaugh as the next Supreme Court Justice of the United States.

Brett Kavanaugh is from the D.C Circuit Court of Appeals.

This is a great victory for conservatives and republicans alike. The United States in general benefits greatly off this pick. With the appointment of Brett Kavanaugh, the rule of law and the constitution will always be represented from this day forward on the highest bench in the USA.

This is President Trump's second SCOTUS appointment, and chances are Trump will get a third appointment. Ruth Ginsburg seems to be the next one to leave the nations highest bench, and it's very likely it'll happen by 2020, but extremely likely it'll happen by 2024. 2024 will be Trump's last year in office.

The left seems to abuse the federal courts in this country, and they'd use the Supreme Court as a bully pulpit. Many feared if the left gained control of the Supreme Court, then the constitution itself will be at jeopardy, but luckily we won't have to worry about that for decades to come.