Where Wisconsin lawmakers stand on attacking Syria

Eight of 10 members of the state’s congressional delegation are opposed to or are leaning toward opposing military strikes. Only Reps. Ron Kind and Gwen Moore remain undecided. Here’s what they’re saying:

Senator Ron Johnson

Republican-OshkoshPosition: Likely No
"I'm not an automatic 'no,' but there's a long way to go to convince me that this is the proper course of action."

SenatorTammy Baldwin

Democrat-MadisonPosition: Likely No
"I'm pleased we are having this debate and will be an active participant in it. There is a reason why so many scholars and analysts have written that there are no good options in Syria. It's because there are no good options. The use of chemical weapons is a global atrocity and demands a global response. … America must not act alone."

RepresentativePaul Ryan

Republican-JanesvilleCongressional District: 1st Position: Leaning No
"I told the Administration that I will hear their case today, read the classified documents, and attend the briefings," Ryan told WRJN. "But I have yet to see something that makes me think this is a comprehensive and strategic move that requires this kind of use of force."

Representative Mark Pocan

Democrat-Madison Congressional District: 2nd Position: Likely No
"I will not support a military strike in Syria."

Representative Ron Kind

Democrat-La Crosse Congressional District: 3rd Position: Undecided
"I've asked the Obama Administration for a more clear picture about what would the day after look like if we were to launch cruise missiles. I just think there are more questions that have to be answered."

Representative Gwen Moore

Democrat-Milwaukee Congressional District: 4thPosition: Undecided
"I will continue to fully review the recent intelligence regarding the chemical attacks in Syria. I look forward to engaging in a comprehensive and productive debate."

Representative Jim Sensenbrenner

Republican-Menomonee Falls Congressional District: 5th Position: Likely No
"[Obama's] plan for military force will not help the Syrian people or promote the freedom or security of the United States. Therefore, I oppose the President's plan and intend to vote against it when it is considered by the House."

Representative Tom Petri

Republican-Fond du Lac Congressional District: 6th Position: Leaning No
"There are simply too many unanswered questions at this point, and I've said before that I don't think we’ve exhausted all other options."

Representative Sean Duffy

Republican-Weston Congressional District: 7th Position: Likely No
"At this time, it is not clear who we're fighting with or what we're fighting for. Therefore, I do not plan to support the resolution to intervene."

Representative Reid Ribble

Republican-Sherwood Congressional District: 8thPosition: Likely No
"Having now been fully apprised of the situation and objectives, I am fully opposed to military action at this time."