For the theory of man-made global warming,
the letters AGW are used . The letters stand for anthropogenic global warming, and AGW is a general term used by writers on
the subject.

Because of what they claim is AGW, caused
primarily by CO2, the Global Warmers want this country and the world to give
up the best and most efficient energy sources we have – coal, gasoline,
diesel, and natural gas; and replace them with wind and solar power, which
is much less efficient and dependable, and much more costly. It has also
never been explained how wind and solar power could replace the tremendous
amount of energy now used. Their claims are both fraudulent and insane.

It is true that the use of the better and more
efficient energy sources, called fossil fuels, puts more CO2 into the
atmosphere.

The basis of the claim that CO2 causes
global warming, as stated and depicted by the "Skeptical Science" website of one
of the major global warming proponents, is[1]:

The greenhouse effect occurs
because greenhouse gases let sunlight (shortwave radiation) pass through the
atmosphere. The earth absorbs sunlight, warms then reradiates heat (infrared or
longwave radiation). The outgoing longwave radiation is absorbed by greenhouse
gases in the atmosphere. This heats the atmosphere which in turn re-radiates
longwave radiation in all directions. Some of it makes its way back to the
surface of the earth. So with more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, we expect
to see less longwave radiation escaping to space at the wavelengths that carbon
dioxide absorb. We also expect to see more infrared radiation returning back to
Earth at these same wavelengths.

Satellite measurements of outgoing longwave
radiation

Please note that the above says nothing
whatsoever about the incoming infrared radiation from the sun, which is far
greater than the small amount of infrared emitted back by the earth. The
infrared radiation from the sun is about half of the sun's total radiation, as
shown later in this article. CO2 absorbs incoming infrared radiation from the
sun in the same way that it absorbs outgoing infrared radiation from the Earth.
Another fallacy is failure of the Global Warmers (AGW proponents) to take into consideration thesimplefact that the when Earth's
surface is heated by the sun where there is ground, a part of the heat goes down
into the ground by what is called conduction, and not out into the air and
atmosphere. The same is true where the earth's surface is water. This is a
simple scientific law of thermodynamics and heat transfer. The following is from
a scientific article on this[2]:

The third major use of radiant energy is to warm the subsurface
of the Earth. Heat is transferred from the surface downwards via conduction.
Like in the case of sensible heat transfer, a temperature gradient must exist
between the surface and the subsurface for heat transfer to occur. Heat is
transferred downwards when the surface is warmer than the subsurface (positive
ground heat flux). If the subsurface is warmer than the surface then heat is
transferred upwards (negative ground heat flux).

When the ground is heated by the sun, the ground right below
the surface is generally cooler than the top, and absorbs part of the surface
heat. Water, which makes up most of the Earth's surface, has a higher
conductivity than the ground or air.[3]
A part of the heat from the Earth's surface is conducted downward and absorbed
by the ground and the water. Thermodynamics explains this conduction of heat.
Determining the amount of the heat absorbed by the Earth is complicated –
particularly with ground surface with all of its differences and things placed
on the ground. But this does not excuse scientists from completely ignoring it.
Some of this heat is later radiated back into the atmosphere, and some is stored
for long periods of time. Some is used for work, such as moving ocean currents,
and not radiated back into the atmosphere. Some is used by humans, animals, and
plants, and is not radiated back.

The Global Warmers completely ignore this conduction factor,
and treat all of the heating of the Earth's surface as being reflected,
conducted, and radiated back into the atmosphere. The following is a prime
example from one of the foremost AGW proponents, National Aeronautics
and Space Administration
(NASA)[4]:

Remember that about 29 percent of
incoming sunlight is reflected back to space by bright particles in the
atmosphere or bright ground surfaces, which leaves about 71 percent to be
absorbed by the atmosphere (23 percent) and the land (48 percent). For the
energy budget at Earth’s surface to balance, processes on the ground must get
rid of the 48 percent of incoming solar energy that the ocean and land surfaces
absorb. Energy leaves the surface through three processes: evaporation,
convection, and emission of thermal infrared energy.

In the above, although their arithmetic seems to be off 1% (25 + 5 + 17 = 47),
they claim that all (an equivalent amount) goes up from the earth's surface by
the processes shown. All of the heat from the Earth's surface is shown as going
up – none down.

Of the 51 units of solar radiation absorbed by Earth’s surface, 23 units are
used to evaporate water, causing a loss of 23 units of heat at Earth’s surface.
Seven (7) units are used for the processes of conduction and convection, also
causing a loss of heat at Earth’s surface. The remaining units of the original
51 units of solar radiation are emitted from Earth’s surface as outgoing
infrared radiation, also known as terrestrial radiation.

Please note
that in the above all of the energy from Earth's surface is shown as going
upward from the earth – none downward, not even of the conduction. This has to
be scientifically wrong, as a matter of thermodynamics. The amount that would be
conducted down from the Earth's surface (which includes all land and water)
leaves less that could be radiated upward as infrared energy. All of this is
completely ignored by the Global Warmers.

I will now
use NASA's own figures to show that the cooling effect of CO2 on Earth's surface
is far greater than the warming effect, although both are so small as to be
negligible. One of the reasons that the effect is so small is that CO2 makes up
only about .037% of the Earth's atmosphere.[6]
Also, this small amount of CO2 is necessary for life on earth. It is a good and
necessary substance. More of it helps the growth of plants, trees and other forms of
life.

Composition of the Earth's atmosphere

The primary
error of the global warmers is completely ignoring the effect of CO2 on the
incoming infrared radiation.
The incoming infrared radiation is about 50% of all of the sun's radiation into
Earth's atmosphere. (Wikipedia says it is 52-55%,[7]
and a University of Oregon website says nearly 50%.[8]) CO2 absorbs
this incoming infrared radiation in the same way that it absorbs the outgoing
infrared radiation. At least half of the energy it absorbs is radiated upward as
much as it is downward. By this it is clear that the cooling effect of CO2 is
50/17 or about 3 times the warming effect, using NASA's own figures for infrared
radiation from the earth. And I believe that NASA's claim (shown above) that
there is 17% infrared radiation from the earth is erroneous. I think that the
cooling effect of CO2 is much greater than 50/17 times.

Some researchers claim
that the cooling effect is about 100 times the warming effect.Researcher
and writer, Alan Siddons, and Physicist, Charles Anderson, PhD, consider the
cooling effect of CO2 to be 100 times the warming effect.[9]The article of Anderson, which includes
information from an article by Siddons, also states that "less than 1% of the
cooling of the Earth's surface is due to IR [infrared] emission of the surface
or the gases near the surface. More than 99% is due to direct contact and
convection." This presents even further error in the Global Warmers' figures.
Professor Nasif Nahle verifies this error.

Nasif Nahle is a University Professor at
University Regiomontana, A. C.,
Monterrey, N. L., Mexico. He has degrees in Biology, Mathematics, Earth
Sciences, and physics.[10]
He has written extensively on AGW, showing many fallacies of the claims of
Global Warmers. One comprehensive paper Nahle wrote isConduction is the Primary
Mechanism of Heat Transfer at the Surface-Atmosphere Boundary.[11]
This paper sates:

In several articles (1)(2)(3)(4)(5),
it has been demonstrated, from the strict standpoint of physics, thermodynamics
and quantum mechanics, that the carbon
dioxide is not physically capable of causing any global warming or climate
change on Earth (1)(2)(3)(4)(5).…In this article, I
demonstrate that the “greenhouse” effect, or warming of the atmosphere, is due
to the energy exchange by conduction at the surface-atmosphere boundary and by
convection from the boundary layer to other parcels of air.[Emphasis added.] …

Radiation heat transfer at the surface-atmosphere boundary layer is a very weak
process of energy exchange between both systems (1)(2). Conversely, the
fundamental process of heat transfer at the surface-atmosphere boundary is by
conduction (6). The energy absorbed by means of conduction from the
surface to the atmosphere is transferred away by the air flow (convection).
(6) …

In the paper, Nahle then demonstrates the above by accepted thermodynamics
formulas and mathematics.

Many of the global warmers are scientists. They could not help but know that
their claims of AGW caused by CO2 are wrong. So why do they do it? Money! Al
Gore got rich off of it. Science has become dominated by politics and money. If
scientists go against AGW propaganda, their grants will disappear. A primary
proponent of AGW is the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which
is a United Nations organization. Its history states[12]:

The
IPCC's formation, purpose and mission is based on the false assumption of AGW,
which, in the above, is called "human-induced climate change." The truth would
destroy the need for existence of the IPCC.So it misinforms and defrauds the world.

The
biggest and most expensive fraud in the history of mankind is being perpetrated
on this country and the world.