alephnull2k1

capfund wrote:I was justing thinking about your NULL pointer comment, and just because the refigerator could be "empty" wouldn't make it NULL, the refigerator would still exist... so calling a member function even if its empty wouldn't throw any error...

Oh, the NULL pointer reference wasn't specific to the shirt...more of a general programming axiom...

Although, since you don't check for the existence of cereal before invoking makecereal(), a refrigerator lacking eggs could result in a nasty error if you're out of cereal. There may also be an assumed dependency in makecereal() that you have some sort of cereal-compatible liquid on hand (milk, beer, vodka, etc.), depending on whose requirements you're trying to satisfy.

theziv

Walmazan, again you have out done yourself. I already own 4 of your shirts and have wanted to buy every single shirt that you have ever designed. Not so much because I liked everyone of them, but because I really respect you as an artist and I absolutely love to support you. I hope that this prints, because if it does, I will most certainly be purchasing it.

gramku

capfund

alephnull2k1 wrote:Oh, the NULL pointer reference wasn't specific to the shirt...more of a general programming axiom...

Although, since you don't check for the existence of cereal before invoking makecereal(), a refrigerator lacking eggs could result in a nasty error if you're out of cereal. There may also be an assumed dependency in makecereal() that you have some sort of cereal-compatible liquid on hand (milk, beer, vodka, etc.), depending on whose requirements you're trying to satisfy.

lol yeah cereal is meant to encompass more than the traditional sense... But this idea of mine was much more elaborate and longer and it had to get truncated down to fit on a shirt... I have at one point an infinite loop of bacon eating invovling a farm...

capfund

halonoid1 wrote:If this doesn't print here (which, sadly, it looks like it won't) please let me know if you get it printed somewhere else. Especially since I'm not partial to any of the shirts currently in the fog.

There is always the off chance of an editors choice... Otherwise I'll find some way of spreading the word where ever it ends up.

smanchen

theziv wrote:Walmazan, again you have out done yourself. I already own 4 of your shirts and have wanted to buy every single shirt that you have ever designed. Not so much because I liked everyone of them, but because I really respect you as an artist and I absolutely love to support you. I hope that this prints, because if it does, I will most certainly be purchasing it.

Well said! I feel the same way. Everything Walmazan does is so awesome. His simplistic, yet detailed style is cute without giving me cavities.

The world is a dangerous place to live ... not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it.
- Albert Einstein

McWhoopass

Its a little known fact that the original idea for the Vitruvian Man was conceived by a man named Vitruvius (duh) who coincidentally, wanted the model to be a cat. Da Vinci, being a staunch supporter of dogs...and men, decided to go a different direction. Imagine how different the Renaissance would have been if we'd had Walmazan to interpret Vitruvius's love of cats rather than Da Vinci! We'd probably still be measuring things by paws rather than feet.

Thanks Walmazan for getting history right.

Note: All of this information comes from Wikipedia so it might not be entirely accurate.

ApeLad

Reldnahcire wrote:A little bit of wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey going on here but if you want this shirt to be made as much as me remember to tell your friends, because if "everyone thinks of one word at one specific time"..."One word, just one thought, but with FIFTEEN SATELLITES" we might just get this shirt!

Thanks! It's already doing better than it did the first time around, so that's something.

Woot.com is operated by Woot Services LLC.
Products on Woot.com are sold by Woot, Inc., other than items on Wine.Woot which are sold by the seller specified on the product detail page.
Product narratives are for entertainment purposes and frequently employ
literary point of view;
the narratives do not express Woot's editorial opinion.
Aside from literary abuse, your use of this site also subjects you to Woot's
terms of use
and
privacy policy.
Woot may designate a user comment as a Quality Post, but that doesn't mean we agree with or guarantee anything said or linked to in that post.