Tuesday, July 12, 2016

Can Obama be stopped from locking in Iran deal

Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Bret Stephens reports that despite German intelligence reports last week that Iran has attempted to purchase nuclear technology in Germany since signing the JCPOA, the Obama administration appears determined to 'lock in' the Iran deal to prevent a future President from unraveling it.

All this was enough to prompt Angela Merkel
to warn the Bundestag last week that Iran “continued to develop its
rocket program in conflict with relevant provisions of the U.N. Security
Council.” Don’t expect German sanctions, but at least the chancellor is
living in the reality zone.

As for the Obama administration, not
so much. For the past year it has developed a narrative—spoon-fed to
the reporters and editorial writers Ben Rhodes publicly mocks as dopes and dupes—that Iran has met all its obligations under the deal, and now deserves extra cookies in the form of access to U.S. dollars, Boeing jets, U.S. purchases of
Iranian heavy water (thereby subsidizing its nuclear program), and
other concessions the administration last year promised Congress it
would never grant.

“We still have sanctions on Iran for its
violations of human rights, for its support for terrorism, and for its
ballistic-missile program, and we will continue to enforce those
sanctions vigorously,” Mr. Obama said in January. Whatever.

The administration is now weighing whether
to support Iran’s membership in the World Trade Organization. That
would neutralize a future president’s ability to impose sanctions on
Iran, since WTO rules would allow Tehran to sue Washington for
interfering with trade. The administration has also pushed the Financial
Action Task Force, an international body that enforces
anti-money-laundering standards, to ease pressure on Iran, which FATF did last month by suspending some restrictions for the next year.

And then there’s the Boeing deal to sell $17.6 billion worth of jets to Iran, which congressional Republicans led by Illinois’s Pete Roskam are trying to stop. Iran uses its civilian fleet to ferry weapons and fighters to its terrorist clients in Syria and Lebanon.

“The
administration is trying to lock in the Iran deal and prevent a future
president from doing anything, including pushing back on Iran’s malign
behavior,” says the Foundation for Defense of Democracies’ Mark
Dubowitz, who knows more about Iran sanctions than anyone in Washington.
“Instead of curbing Iran’s worst behavior, the administration
effectively facilitates it.”

The first amendment [to the Appropriations Bill] prevents the Office of Foreign Assets Control from using funds to authorize the license necessary for the aircraft to be sold to Iran. The second one blocks loans from U.S. financial institutions for the purchase of planes that can be adapted for military use.

"Iran systemically uses commercial aircraft to spread death, destruction and mayhem, and we can do something about it," [Representative Peter] Roskam [R-Il] said on the House floor.

...

Airbus had reached an agreement in January to sell Tehran 118 planes. Because some of the aircraft components are made in the U.S., the deal was awaiting approval from the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control.

The day after the approval of the amendments, an Iranian foreign ministry spokesman said step was "incompatible" with the country's nuclear deal with the U.S. Under the deal, America lifted the economic sanctions previously levied on Iran in return for Tehran curbing its nuclear ambitions.

“We have nothing to do with U.S. internal affairs,” Bahram Ghasemi was quoted as saying by the official IRNA news agency. “We consider the government of the United States to be responsible for implementing the country’s commitments” under the accord.

Of course, the bill still has to pass the Senate, which effectively approved the Iran deal last year in a party-line vote. And then it might have to override an Obama veto. And Obama doesn't need Congressional approval to approve Iran joining the WTO, although Congress can make it difficult for him according to Northwestern University law professor Eugene Kontorovich, whom I asked that question.

My bet is that sometime between November 8 and January 20, Obama will allow those jet sales to go ahead and announce US support for Iran's application to join the WTO. After all, it's part of his legacy.

1 Comments:

(Venturing into wacko territory ...) IIRC, one of Hanoi John's close relatives made a lot of money after JK became a Senator, doing lots of business with Hanoi. He's also alleged to have laundered Hanoi money into JK's election campaigns. -- One hesitates to imagine what Jarrett & Company have cooking. Today's Iran is substantially more corrupt than the Shah's.

Links to this post:

About Me

I am an Orthodox Jew - some would even call me 'ultra-Orthodox.' Born in Boston, I was a corporate and securities attorney in New York City for seven years before making aliya to Israel in 1991 (I don't look it but I really am that old :-). I have been happily married to the same woman for thirty-five years, and we have eight children (bli ayin hara) ranging in age from 13 to 33 years and nine grandchildren. Four of our children are married! Before I started blogging I was a heavy contributor on a number of email lists and ran an email list called the Matzav from 2000-2004. You can contact me at: IsraelMatzav at gmail dot com