Send me email updates about messages I've received on the site and the latest news from The CafeMom Team.
By signing up, you certify that you are female and accept the Terms of Service and have read the
Privacy Policy.

Finally, I agree with Demo Feinstein to make the WH.........

Lawmakers vow to crack down on intelligence leaks

June 7, 2012: Leaders of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees hold a news conference, on Capitol Hill in Washington. From left are Rep. C.A. "Dutch" Ruppersberger, D-Md., the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee; House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, R-Mich., Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., vice-chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. (AP)

WASHINGTON – Leaders of the Senate and House intelligence committees said Thursday they were drafting legislation to further limit who can access highly classified information and possibly impose new penalties for revealing it.

The head of the House intelligence committee said he will investigate recent leaks, but the CIA and the Justice Department national security division said they would not cooperate.

The action comes after recent leaks of sensitive information about the covert drone and cyber wars against terrorism.

"There has been just a cascade of leaks coming out of the intelligence community in the last several weeks and months," the vice chairman of the Senate intelligence committee, Republican Sen. Saxby Chambliss told reporters. "It's our clear intention to put a stop to this."

The bipartisan news conference of the four top lawmakers was spurred by a series of media reports detailing everything from White House policy on the highly classified targeting of Al Qaeda militants by drones and raids, to the White House reportedly deploying the cyber weapon known as Stuxnet, a malicious computer code that knocked Iranian nuclear processing centrifuges offline.

The House Intelligence Committee chairman, Republican Rep. Mike Rogers, said his committee would formally investigate the leaks, though he said the process would be hampered because two critical government agencies said they would not participate.

"Just today the CIA informed the (committee) that it cannot respond to our request for information regarding the leaks, a very troubling event indeed," Rogers said.

The CIA has come under fire for allegedly sharing with Hollywood filmmakers classified details of last year's U.S. raid into Pakistan that killed Usama bin Laden.

Rogers said the Justice Department's National Security Division also withdrew itself "with respect to at least one investigation regarding disclosures."

Rogers initially said that indicated the leaks may have come from the FBI or Justice Department, but later clarified that it showed "the serious complications facing the department in investigating these matters."

There are at least three investigations ongoing into disclosures of classified information.

Leading Republicans like Sen. John McCain have accused the White House of spilling national security secrets to boost the president's reputation in an election year -- a charge the White House dismissed Thursday.

"The president feels very strongly that we must prevent leaks of classified or sensitive information" that could jeopardize intelligence or other operations, White House spokesman Jay Carney said. "Any suggestion that the White House has leaked sensitive information for political purposes has no basis in fact."

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Democrat Dianne Feinstein said Congress wants the White House to notify lawmakers at least 48 hours in advance and explain when it chooses to disclose national secrets.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein along with congressional leaders are pledging a bipartisan effort to stop the leaks of classified information. They met Thursday with the Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. (June 7)

This is a difficult issue and I think it can be abused in the wrong hands. It must be spelled out what is a national security secret and what is not for this to not trample the rights of media to report on the activities of our government.

Huh??? The NYTs has been spilling secrets for some time now. And trample the rights of the media?! Screw that! What happened to my rights of my government protecting me? The damn media would rather scoop the story than keep something quiet under the protection of National Security......

Quoting matreshka:

This is a difficult issue and I think it can be abused in the wrong hands. It must be spelled out what is a national security secret and what is not for this to not trample the rights of media to report on the activities of our government.

Send me email updates about messages I've received on the site and the latest news from The CafeMom Team.
By signing up, you certify that you are female and accept the Terms of Service and have read the
Privacy Policy.