Attention!!! Pro Sports Daily will be down on Wednesday morning from 5:00am - 7:00am eastern time for database maintenance. All Sports Direct Inc. properties will be down during this scheduled outage.
Sorry for any inconvenience that this outage may cause.

If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

But the statement I quoted above is totally wrong, if you're implying (as you clearly seem to be) that becuase it's the government, and not our fellow citizens, who guarantees our constitutional rights, that only the government, and not the citizenry, is obligated under the Constitution not to violate those rights.

But the statement I quoted above is totally wrong, if you're implying (as you clearly seem to be) that becuase it's the government, and not our fellow citizens, who guarantees our constitutional rights, that only the government, and not the citizenry, is obligated under the Constitution not to violate those rights.

California Western School of Law Class of 2008. Look it up. Its the oldest law school in San Diego.

1. Most of the people I talk to that hate the illegals the most and want them gone are the good honest people that worked to get here the legal way that are angry at these crooks.

Well yes. Many illegals are criminals, and not just the whole lying thing. It's the increased drug trafficking, rape, murder, armed robbery, etc that bothers me.

2. If we need them here send the illegals back and open the door for more of the good, honest people trying to do it the legal way. And remember being an illegal means you are not an honest person.

I'd like to get some good immigrants. Latin America's given us some pretty ****ty immigrants. Instead of looking at the country they're from, we need to start recruiting immigrants that are good at things. Immigrants with skills. Other than talking really loudly in spanish on public busses and waving mexicans flags of course.

Originally Posted by DenButsu

I graduated from college in May 1994.

And you might want to ask your law school to... oh, never mind...

But the statement I quoted above is totally wrong, if you're implying (as you clearly seem to be) that becuase it's the government, and not our fellow citizens, who guarantees our constitutional rights, that only the government, and not the citizenry, is obligated under the Constitution not to violate those rights.

I could be wrong, but I think he also meant that we as citizens still have the right to kick their *****. Could be wrong though

"Compromise, hell! That's what has happened to us all down the line -- and that's the very cause of our woes. If freedom is right and tyranny is wrong, why should those who believe in freedom treat it as if it were a roll of bologna to be bartered a slice at a time?"

^^ Yes, so if they spit on you can't you strike in self-defense? All hypothetical of course I'm not about to take on a mob.

"Compromise, hell! That's what has happened to us all down the line -- and that's the very cause of our woes. If freedom is right and tyranny is wrong, why should those who believe in freedom treat it as if it were a roll of bologna to be bartered a slice at a time?"

^^ Yes, so if they spit on you can't you strike in self-defense? All hypothetical of course I'm not about to take on a mob.

Isn't self defense supposed to be only responding with reasonable force? In other words, not shooting someone if they slap you? I think striking someone who spits on you is well beyond reasonable or necessary force.

Isn't self defense supposed to be only responding with reasonable force? In other words, not shooting someone if they slap you? I think striking someone who spits on you is well beyond reasonable or necessary force.

Spitting and hitting are both considered to be a physical strike under the law.

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A man who intentionally spat at another can be charged with criminal assault, a U.S. appeals court ruled on Wednesday.

Jeffrey Lewellyn was sentenced to two years probation and 50 hours of community service after he spat in 2004 at a patient who swore at him on the grounds of a Veterans Administration Medical Center in Walla Walla, Washington.

He appealed the conviction, arguing that spitting did not constitute an assault, but the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed.

"Intentionally spitting on another person is an offensive touching that rises to the level of simple assault," the three-judge panel wrote.

Member of the Owlluminati

Originally Posted by James Madison

"Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: And a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives."

At least I know I have the legal backing to use hitting as self-defense in retaliation of spitting lol.

"Compromise, hell! That's what has happened to us all down the line -- and that's the very cause of our woes. If freedom is right and tyranny is wrong, why should those who believe in freedom treat it as if it were a roll of bologna to be bartered a slice at a time?"

"Compromise, hell! That's what has happened to us all down the line -- and that's the very cause of our woes. If freedom is right and tyranny is wrong, why should those who believe in freedom treat it as if it were a roll of bologna to be bartered a slice at a time?"

Yeah I learned that in a Labor Law class I took in undergrad. I couldn't really remember all the details because that was the last law class I took, but I remember being suprised by that. It reminded me of Roberto Alomar.

Member of the Owlluminati

Originally Posted by James Madison

"Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: And a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives."

Whether that's another one of your unfunny sarcastic jokes or not, I do hope you have the experience, in the course of your language studies, to travel to another country and be treated like **** because you don't know the language.

2) And it's happened. I've lived in Quebec, where few people knew english.

And what did I do? Did I wave flags around saying "speak my language because I'm an immigrant and you've been here for a long time so I'm supreme?" Did I demand all signs be bilingual? Did I demand the government print things in my language?

No. I grew a pair and learned French. And in my home I spoke english and french, but I did speak french.

Of course, Quebec's a sad example because really that whole province should have assimilated. It's an example of why countries can't have two fighting cultures/languages.

3) And karma doesn't exist. That's why I'm still alive.

"Compromise, hell! That's what has happened to us all down the line -- and that's the very cause of our woes. If freedom is right and tyranny is wrong, why should those who believe in freedom treat it as if it were a roll of bologna to be bartered a slice at a time?"