Again, whilst riding home tonight I get a yell " points your lights down" or words to that effect.Now I have my Expilon 150 lumen ( x2) aimed so I can see about 3m ahead.I do this so I can see where I'm going.Now I realise theyre bright- thats why I bought them- never mind the 900 lumen jobbies some have.I get the point- theyre blinding if you look directly at them, and thence dangerous.I could point them so they dont dazzle oncoming riders/cars but then I cant see well enough.Dilemma.Oh, thanks to the do gooders who yell abuse.Given the number of ill aimed lights, you must get hoarse.

So, you'd think those inconsiderate "do gooders" would just turn the other cheek rather than complain about being dazzled by your lights. Who do they think they are? After all it only matters that you can see where you are going, so stuff everyone else.

150 lumens is not much light, even with 2 of them, and aimed the way you describe i would suggest the person who yelled at you needs to get a life. My usual light is 250 lumens and aimed like yours it is not excessive by any means, though like yours if you look straight into it, it is very very bright.

When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments- Elizabeth West.

RonK wrote:So, you'd think those inconsiderate "do gooders" would just turn the other cheek rather than complain about being dazzled by your lights. Who do they think they are? After all it only matters that you can see where you are going, so stuff everyone else.

Gee. In response to your first question: yes. I don't yell abuse at any of those dazzling me nor the ninjas who frequent the roads/paths I do. Clearly it's a compromise between meseeing where I'm going and them looking at my lights. Sorry I'm for self preservation. I got home and parked my bike and re aimed them , so should be a bit better. I'll look into those lights too- thanks for the tip.

RonK wrote:So, you'd think those inconsiderate "do gooders" would just turn the other cheek rather than complain about being dazzled by your lights. Who do they think they are? After all it only matters that you can see where you are going, so stuff everyone else.

Gee. In response to your first question: yes. I don't yell abuse at any of those dazzling me nor the ninjas who frequent the roads/paths I do. Clearly it's a compromise between meseeing where I'm going and them looking at my lights. Sorry I'm for self preservation. I got home and parked my bike and re aimed them , so should be a bit better. I'll look into those lights too- thanks for the tip.

Just don't expect the complaints to stop. I've got B&Ms and they're great, but I still get complaints from randoms on bikepaths. Their problem...

RonK wrote:So, you'd think those inconsiderate "do gooders" would just turn the other cheek rather than complain about being dazzled by your lights. Who do they think they are? After all it only matters that you can see where you are going, so stuff everyone else.

You are absolutely right, RonK. it matters that I can see where I'm going when I ride and I don't really give a toss about anyone else. They do what they have to do.

When I see bright lights coming towards me I divert my focus just a bit so I'm not looking directly into them. My Ay-Ups, by the way, are set so that the hot spot is about 5 metres in front of the bike.

I had one bad "off" because of poor lights and I can tell you right now, brother, I won't have another one.

gorilla monsoon wrote:it matters that I can see where I'm going when I ride and I don't really give a toss about anyone else.

As long as we aim carefully. There may be no equivalent law to car 'high beaming' but if we flash someone coming the other way, *they* can't see where they're riding. It's not just courtesy, it's about their safety too!

I got a moon X power (1500 lumen) for the front and also a saxon capped ayup for the back ( also have a few strategically placed fibre flares of various colours so I look quite the christmas tree at night time ... but at least I know that if anyone hits me it will be done out of maliciousness as opposed to not being able to see me )

I have a mound of insulation tape on the bar where I mount the moon power so that it is slightly off side (the result is that it sends the beam slightly to the left ... as opposed directly into traffic front on). It also has different brightness settings (down to 300 lumens and a flashing 1000 lumen) so you can adjust it to environments.

The ayups (560 + 40% = 784 lumen?) can be swiveled according to needs - at night time I am especially mindful to have them facing the ground since they could probably do retinal damage at night time

That said, I think (having a job that requires I drive a vehicle for at least 8 hours a day) its the nature of commuter traffic that its mainly about what sort of day a person is having. If its just one or two isolated incidents don't worry about it. If you see oncoming traffic constantly averting their face or screwing up their eyes in irritation (particularly other cyclists) then you may have cause for thought.

Also it pays to consider the environment you are riding through. If there is a lot of ambient light (as per your typical city night scene) personally I think you would have to try really hard to dazzle with a mere 150 lumens.

Also you could possible buy yourself a bit more visibility without dazzling by mounting the light a bit lower to the ground (like say above the front wheel instead of the handlebars)

Cheesewheel wrote:I have a mound of insulation tape on the bar where I mount the moon power so that it is slightly off side (the result is that it sends the beam slightly to the left ... as opposed directly into traffic front on).

Good man, CW! I'm sure come Australia Day there'll be a medal in the mail!

The Light and Motion Urban 500s actually let you swivel them on their tool-less rubber mount to do exactly that.

As il padrone pointed out, properly designed lights such as the B&M Ixon IQ are designed very much like car head lights.Thus, they work pretty much like a car headlight set on low beam. That is they don't dazzle other vehicles and pedestrians etc.

Take a look at your typical bicycle light. It is essentially the same design as a torch (flashlight to US people). Most non-German lights are the same. It has a circular pattern. That is why when you are riding along on the flashing setting, you see the reflective street signs flashing from about 300m away.This is the light that is annoying other people.

Given that there is a huge number of SMIDSY incidents and accidents and given that cyclists are very vulnerable road users, I think bright LED lights are great on the road. Perhaps we should try and dim them down a bit for the bike/pedestrian paths.

Yeah, knock yourself out, I'll probably manage. I used to do night time runs up and down the Hume between Wagga and Canberra. You reckon your lights are brighter than a full complement of retina-wreckers on your average semi?Too many sooks.

gorilla monsoon wrote:Yeah, knock yourself out, I'll probably manage. I used to do night time runs up and down the Hume between Wagga and Canberra. You reckon your lights are brighter than a full complement of retina-wreckers on your average semi?Too many sooks.

This is the kind of response that sometimes makes hanging out here unpleasant. I am a bit surprised as it seems a bit out of character for gm.

I do find it disconcerting sometimes when an oncoming cyclist has bright lights that shine directly into my eyes. Calling people a sook, is not at all helpful. The vision of my path is essentially non-existent for a short space of time and as result I can sometimes get the wobbles. It can also make it hard to judge the location of the rider as they approach. I have also ridden busy highways with semis, but find the oncoming cyclist scenario far more offputting, possibly because of the close proximity, the unpredictable behaviour of some cyclists, the focussed beam of the lights being used. I don't say anything to the other cyclists at the time, as I understand their desire to have bright lights, but I do wish people would be a bit more considerate and direct their lights lower.

To the OP, it might well be worth testing out how your lights look as you approach your bike as was earlier suggested. You might find you are able to find a better compromise on the positioning, or instead that the person who gave you a hard time was just being unreasonable.

I purposely adjust my light so that it is angled down to avoid blinding other cyclists and cars while I still see enough of the road. It would be nicer to point it up more and see further however I have the "do unto others" mentality.

Other cyclists with dazzling lights are annoying when it is pitch black, you really can't see much. If they are climing a hill at 10 - 15kmh, they don't really need to see 500 metres. The good news is that I find most cyclists are considerate.

As others have said, it really does come down to the design of the light. You can have most of them pointed 3-5m in front of you and they will still be blinding motorists.

The problem is not just the time you loose averting your gaze but also the time it takes to recover your 'night vision' as it were. I've coped a blinding a couple of times from some really powerful bike lights and really puts you off.

It's a case of the law needing to catch up with the technology as bike lights now seem to be as bright as car lights. They need to regulate the beam spread of bike lights in the same way as car and motorbikes.

Would we be happy if car lights were allowed to have a beam spread the same as ours?

Sorry, I'm siding wth GM on this one. I do the right thing with where I aim my lights and I still get whinged at. I find it frustrating.

A bike is a vehicle just like a car. If you're relying on "don't hit me" blinkies and you can't see unlit obstacles or where to go properly without a full moon or street lights, you've made a decision to go without adequate lights, period. That is your problem, not mine.

So criticism of me for doing what I must to manage my own safety is unlikely to be met with sympathy. You'll be told to HTFU and start pulling your own weight.

If you had decent lights of your own you'd be fine. So get some.

By the way, Ay Ups and the like still only put out a fraction of the power of low beam car headlights.

Alien27 wrote:It's a case of the law needing to catch up with the technology as bike lights now seem to be as bright as car lights. They need to regulate the beam spread of bike lights in the same way as car and motorbikes.

Agree, but since bike lights are a bolt-on and not a factory supplied item permanently connected to the bike it won't be that simple. MTB lights with a wider spread will still be available and many will still choose these. Policing on off-road bike tracks is almost non-existent at night, so unlikely to change cyclists' behavior.

trailgumby wrote:By the way, Ay Ups and the like still only put out a fraction of the power of low beam car headlights.

One set of 2010 Ay Ups is a bit less bright than a single car headlight. But car headlights are shaped which makes a big difference IMO.

Last edited by Nobody on Fri Aug 17, 2012 3:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

trailgumby wrote:Sorry, I'm siding wth GM on this one. I do the right thing with where I aim my lights and I still get whinged at. I find it frustrating.

A bike is a vehicle just like a car. If you're relying on "don't hit me" blinkies and you can't see unlit obstacles or where to go properly without a full moon or street lights, you've made a decision to go without adequate lights, period. That is your problem, not mine.

So criticism of me for doing what I must to manage my own safety is unlikely to be met with sympathy. You'll be told to HTFU and start pulling your own weight.

If you had decent lights of your own you'd be fine. So get some.

By the way, Ay Ups and the like still only put out a fraction of the power of low beam car headlights.

What he said. And I'm siding with me too.

And when you nosedive into the shrubbery one night and rip yourself open because your lights were inadequate come and ask me where I got my Ay-Ups from.