Described are imbibition compositions that incorporate kinetic enhancing additive(s) into photochromic polymeric host material. Kinetic enhancing additives include organic polyol(s), epoxy-containing compound(s) or a mixture thereof that improves the performance of organic photochromic compounds in the polymeric host as determined in the Photochromic Performance Test. Also described is a process for incorporating kinetic enhancing additives into polymeric substrates prior to, after and/or with organic photochromic compounds and the resulting photochromic articles produced by such a process.

Imágenes(19)

Reclamaciones(14)

1. A process for imparting photochromism to an organic polymeric host material comprising transferring from a removable imbibition composition comprising photochromic compound(s) selected from the group consisting naphthopyrans, benzopyrans, indenonaphthopyrans, quinopyrans, phenanthropyrans, metal dithizonates, fulgides, fulgimides and mixtures thereof, and from 0.1 to 99.9 weight percent, based on the total weight of the composition, of kinetic enhancing additive(s) comprising polyol(s), epoxy-containing compounds or a mixture of polyols and epoxy-containing compounds into said organic polymeric host material and removing the residual film formed from said composition.

2. The process of claim 1 wherein the transferring of photochromic compounds and kinetic enhancing additives is done from a carrier of solvent, polymeric resin or a mixture thereof, provided said polymeric resin is different from the kinetic enhancing additive.

3. The process of claim 1 wherein the transferring of a photochromic amount of photochromic compound(s) and a photochromic performance improving amount of kinetic enhancing additive(s) is accomplished by a transferring order step selected from the group consisting of:

4. The process of claim 1 wherein the transferring of a photochromic amount of photochromic compound(s) and a photochromic performance improving amount of kinetic enhancing additive(s) is accomplished by a transferring order step selected from the group consisting of:

(a) transferring a portion of the photochromic performance improving amount of kinetic enhancing additive prior to transferring the photochromic compound and the remainder of the photochromic performance improving amount of kinetic enhancing additive;

(b) transferring a portion of the photochromic amount of photochromic compound prior to transferring the kinetic enhancing additive and the remainder of the photochromic amount of photochromic compound; and

(c) transferring a portion of the photochromic performance improving amount of kinetic enhancing additive and a portion of the photochromic amount of photochromic compound prior to transferring the remainder of each.

5. The process of claim 1 wherein the transferring of photochromic compounds and kinetic enhancing additives is done with at least one of ultraviolet light absorber(s), ultraviolet light stabilizer(s), antioxidant(s), rheology control agent(s), or leveling agent(s).

8. The process of claim 1 wherein the mixture of polyols and epoxy-containing compounds is in a weight proportion of from 1:99 to 99:1.

9. The process of claim 8 wherein the polyol is polycaprolactone diol and the epoxy-containing compound is trimethylolpropane triglycidyl ether.

10. The process of claim 1 wherein the epoxy-containing compound(s) is represented by graphic formulae I, II, III or a mixture thereof:

wherein

(i) R1 is hydrogen or C1–C3 alkyl;

(ii) n is the integer one, two, three or four; when n is one, A is C2–C20 alkyl, substituted C2–C20 alkyl, C3–C20 cycloalkyl, substituted C3–C20 cycloalkyl; the unsubstituted or substituted aryl groups, phenyl and naphthyl; aryl(C1–C3)alkyl, substituted aryl(C1–C3)alkyl, acryloxy, methacryloxy; the group —C(O)Y, wherein Y is C2–C20 alkyl, C1–C6 alkoxy or aryl; or the group —R—(OR)m—OH or —(OR)m—OH, wherein R is C2–C4 alkylene and m is an integer from 1 to 20; said alkyl and cycloalkyl substituents being carboxy, hydroxy or C1–C3 alkoxy, said aryl and aryl(C1–C3)alkyl substituents being carboxy, hydroxy, C1–C3 alkoxy or C1–C3 alkyl; or when n is from two to four, A is C2–C20 alkylene, substituted C2–C20 alkylene, C3–C20 cycloalkylene, substituted C3–C20 cycloalkylene; the unsubstituted or substituted arylene groups, phenylene and naphthylene; aryl(C1–C3)alkylene, substituted aryl(C1–C3)alkylene; the group —C(O)Z(O)C—wherein Z is C2–C20 alkylene or arylene; the group —R—(OR)m—or —(OR)m—, wherein R and m are the same as defined hereinbefore; phthaloyl, isophthathoyl, terephthaloyl; hydroxyl-substituted phthaloyl, hydroxy-substituted isophthaloyl, hydroxy-substituted terephthaloyl; or a group represented by the following graphic formula:

wherein R2 and R3 are each C1–C4 alkyl, chlorine or bromine; p and q are each an integer from 0 to 4;

when is the divalent benzene group; or G is —O—, —S—, —CH2—, or —C(CH3)2—, when

is the divalent cyclohexane group; said alkylene and cycloalkylene substituents being carboxy, hydroxy or C1–C3 alkoxy; said arylene and aryl(C1–C3)alkylene substituents being carboxy, hydroxy, C1–C3 alkoxy or C1–C3 alkyl; and

This Application is a Continuation-In-Part of application Ser. No. 09/724,145 filed Nov. 28, 2000 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,433,043, which application is incorporated herein by reference.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to photochromic compositions of enhanced kinetic performance and to a method for improving the performance of organic photochromic compounds in polymeric substrates. More particularly, this invention relates to compositions comprising kinetic enhancing additive(s) (KEA) and organic photochromic compound(s), and optionally, carrier, stabilizer and/or conventional additive(s). The KEA is used in an amount sufficient to improve the performance of organic photochromic compounds in polymeric organic host materials, e.g., polymerizates and polymeric coatings. The KEA(s) may be transferred prior to, after or with the photochromic compound(s) or in a combination of such steps. Still more particularly, this invention relates to photochromic articles, e.g., ophthalmic lenses, made of polymeric substrates having incorporated therein organic photochromic compounds and KEA(s) such as epoxy-containing compound(s), organic polyols and/or a mixture thereof.

Photochromic compounds exhibit a reversible change in color when exposed to radiation including ultraviolet rays, such as the ultraviolet radiation in sunlight or the light of a mercury lamp. Various classes of photochromic compounds have been synthesized and suggested for use in applications in which a sunlight-induced reversible color change or darkening is desired. The most widely described classes are oxazines, chromenes and fulgides.

Photochromic compounds may be incorporated into plastic substrates, such as ophthalmic lenses, by various methods described in the art. Such methods include dissolving or dispersing the compound within the surface of a substrate, e.g., imbibition of the photochromic compound into the substrate by immersion of the substrate in a hot solution of the photochromic compound or by depositing the photochromic compound on the surface of the substrate and thermally transferring the photochromic compound into the substrate. The term “imbibition” or “imbibe” is intended to mean and include permeation of the photochromic compound into the substrate, solvent assisted transfer absorption of the photochromic compound into the substrate, vapor phase transfer and other such transfer mechanisms.

The extent to which the photochromic compounds penetrate the polymeric substrate generally increases with increasing temperature, increasing concentration of photochromic compounds at the surface of the polymeric substrate and increasing period of contact with the polymeric substrate. The ease with which the photochromic compounds are incorporated is also dependent upon the characteristics of the photochromic compounds and of the polymeric substrate. The molecular size, melting point and solvent solubility of the photochromic compounds as well as the receptivity of the polymeric substrate all affect the ease of incorporation of the photochromic compounds. Due to the numerous variables affecting production of photochromic articles, in some cases, photochromic compounds may not be incorporated into the plastic substrate with sufficient uniformity and to a sufficient depth. This can result in poor performance of the photochromic compound and inadequate reversible color change of the photochromic article.

Methods for incorporating photochromic compounds into polymeric substrates have been disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,286,957, 4,880,667, 5,789,015, 5,914,193 and 5,975,696. Various photochromic compositions used in the process of incorporating photochromic compounds into polymeric substrates have been disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,185,390, 5,391,327 and 5,770,115.

The aforementioned photochromic compositions and methods of incorporating photochromic compounds into polymeric substrates are generally known in the art and can be used in the process of the present invention.

The use of epoxy-containing compounds with photochromic compounds has been disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,395,566, 5,462,698, 5,621,017 and 5,776,376. U.S. Pat. No. 5,395,566 discloses a photochromic composition of a compound having at least one radical polymerizable group and at least one epoxy group and a photochromic compound. U.S. Pat. No. 5,462,698 discloses a photochromic composition of a compound having at least one epoxy group, a fulgide compound and two different (meth)acrylic monomers. U.S. Pat. No. 5,621,017 discloses a photochromic composition of a radical polymerization monomer, photochromic compound and photopolymerization initiator. U.S. Pat. No. 5,776,376 discloses a photochromic composition of a polymerizable monomer composed of a compound having at least one epoxy group, various monomers, an α-methylstyrene dimer and photochromic compounds.

In each of the aforedescribed patents disclosing compositions containing epoxy-containing compounds and photochromic compounds, the compositions contained radically polymerizable components and were polymerized to make photochromic lenses.

Although methods exist for incorporating photochromic compounds into polymeric substrates, improvements in such methods are sought. It has now been discovered that transferring a photochromic performance improving amount of kinetic-enhancing additives and a photochromic amount of photochromic compound into an organic polymeric host will result in improved performance of a photochromic compound in the Photochromic Performance Test described in Example 25. This improvement in performance is demonstrated when the photochromic compound(s) is transferred simultaneously with the KEA, prior to the KEA, after the KEA or by using a combination of such steps.

In one contemplated embodiment, the KEA is included in a removable imbibition composition containing organic photochromic compound(s), and that optionally includes carrier, light stabilizer(s), ultraviolet light absorber(s), antioxidant(s), rheology control agents(s) and/or leveling agent(s). Photochromic articles demonstrating improved photochromic performance may be produced by the process of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the present invention, a KEA is defined herein as a material which when transferred into a polymeric host with photochromic compound(s), prior to the photochromic compounds, after the photochromic compounds or by a combination of at least two of such steps, results in an increased rating in the Photochromic Performance Test described in Example 25. The ratings of the test are defined as the result obtained when the change in optical density (AOD) at 15 minutes is divided by the Bleach (T ½) and then multiplied by 10,000.

A photochromic performance improving amount of the KEA is defined herein as the amount necessary to transfer into a organic polymeric host to result in an increased rating in the Photochromic Performance Test as compared to a organic polymeric host substantially free of the KEA. This amount may be transferred into the polymeric host all at once or by first transferring a portion of the amount in one step followed by the remainder of the amount in one or more subsequent transfer steps prior to, after or with the transfer of a photochromic amount of photochromic compound(s). Materials which are KEA(s) include, but are not limited to, organic polyols, epoxy-containing compound(s) and mixtures thereof.

Other than in the operating examples, or where otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients or reaction conditions used herein are to be understood as modified in all instances by the term “about”.

In each instance where the term “weight percent” is used herein with respect to the imbibition composition, it is to be understood that the described weight percent is based on the total weight of the imbibition composition.

Organic polyols are polyhrdric alcohols having 2 or more hydroxyl groups. The organic polyols that may be used in the present invention include (a) polyester polyols; (b) polyether polyols; (c) amide-containing polyols; (d) polyhydric polyvinyl alcohols; and (e) mixtures of such polyols. In one contemplated embodiment, the organic polyols are selected from polyether polyols, polyester polyols or mixtures thereof. In another contemplated embodiment, the organic polyols are selected from polycaprolactone diol, poly(ethylene glycol), hexane diol, polytetrahydrofuran diol or a mixture thereof.

Polyester polyols are generally known. They are prepared by conventional techniques utilizing low molecular weight diols, triols and polyhydric alcohols known in the art (optionally in combination with monhydric alcohols) with polycarboxylic acids. Examples of such low molecular weight polyols include ethylene glycol, trimethylolpropane and pentaerythritol. Examples of suitable polycarboxylic acids include: phthalic acid, isophthalic acid, terephthalic acid, trimellitic acid, tetrahydrophthalic acid, adipic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, fumaric acid and mixtures thereof. Anhydrides of the above acids, where they exist, can also be employed and are encompassed by the term “polycarboxylic acid”. If a triol or polyhydric alcohol is used, a monocarboxylic acid, such as acetic acid and/or benzoic acid, may be used in the preparation of the polyester polyols, and for some purposes, such a polyester polyol maybe desirable.

Moreover, polyester polyols are understood herein to include polyester polyols modified with fatty acids or glyceride oils of fatty acids (i.e., conventional alkyd polyols containing such modification). In addition, certain materials that react in a manner similar to acids to form polyester polyols are also useful. Such materials include lactones, e.g., caprolactone, propiolactone and butyrolactone, and hydroxy acids such as hydroxycaproic acid and dimethylol propionic acid. Lactone polyesters are described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,169,945. Commercially available lactone polyesters or polycaprolactone polyols are sold under the trademarks PLACCEL (Daicell Co. Ltd.) and TONE (Union Carbide).

In one embodiment when the polyester polyol is represented by the following formula:
R6—(X—(C(O)(—CR7R8)h—CHR9—O)t—H)y

wherein:

X is —O— or —NR10— and R10 is hydrogen or C1–C12 alkyl; R6 is an organic radical derived from an initiator. Initiators are compounds having at least one reactive hydrogen capable, with or without the aid of a catalyst, of opening the lactone ring and adding it as an open chain without forming water of condensation. Initiators include monofunctional initiators such as alcohols and amines, and polyfunctional initiators such as polyols, polyamines, aminoalcohols, and vinyl polymers, as well as amides, sulfonamides, hydrozones, semicarbazones, oximes, polycarboxylic acids, hydroxy carboxylic acids and amino-carboxylic acids. R7, R8 and R9 are each selected independently from hydrogen, C1–C12 alkyl, C5–C6 cycloalkyl, C1–C6 alkoxy, benzyl or phenyl, provided that at least h+2 of the total number of R7, R8 and R9 are hydrogen. For example, when butyrolactone (C4H6O2) is the starting material, h is 2 and at least 4, actually 5 of the total number of R7, R8 and R9 are hydrogen. The letter h is an integer from 1 to 6; t is an integer from 1 to 100; and y is an integer equal to from 2 to 6.

In another contemplated embodiment, the polyester polyol is the reaction product of a diol initiator and a lactone, i.e., a polylactone diol. The diol of the polylactone diol may be selected from linear or branched aliphatic diols having from 2 to 20 carbon atoms, poly(C2–C4)alkylene glycols, cycloaliphatic diols having from 5 to 8 carbon atoms in the cyclic ring, monocyclic aromatic diols, bisphenols, hydrogenated bisphenols and mixtures thereof.

Cycloaliphatic diols having from 5 to 8 carbon atoms that may be used to prepare the polylactone diol include, but are not limited to, those cycloaliphatic diols described previously herein, and cyclopentane diol, cyclohexane diol, cyclohexane dimethanol, cycloheptane diol and cyclooctane diol. Examples of monocyclic aromatic diols that may be used to prepare the polylactone diol include but are not limited to, benzene diol, e.g., 1,2-dihydroxy benzene and 1,3-dihydroxy benzene; C1–C4 alkyl substituted benzene diol, e.g., 4-tert-butyl-benzene-1,2-diol, 4-methyl-benzene-1,2-diol, 3-tert-butyl-5-methyl-benzene-1,2-diol and 3,4,5,6-tetramethyl-benzene-1,2-diol; halo substituted benzene diol, e.g., 3,5-dichlorobenzene-1,2-diol, 3,4,5,6-tetrabromo-benzene-1,2-diol and 3,4,5-trichloro-benzene-1,2-diol; and C1–C4 alkyl and halo substituted benzene diol, e.g., 3-bromo-5-tert-butyl-benzene-1,2-diol, 3,6-dichloro-4-methyl-benzene-1,2-diol, 3,-bromo-4,5-dimethyl-benzene-1,2-diol and 3-chloro-4,6-di-tert-butyl-benzene-1,2-diol.

Bisphenols and hydrogenated bisphenols that may be used to prepare the polylactone diol may be represented by the following formula:

wherein R11 and R12 are each selected independently from each other for each f and g from C1–C4 alkyl, chlorine and bromine; f and g are each independently an integer from 0 to 4; and -J- is a divalent linking group selected from —O—, —S—, —S(O2)—, —C(O)—, —CH2—, —CH═CH—, —C(CH3)2—, —C(CH3)(C6H5)— and

represents a benzene ring or a cyclohexane ring. An example of a bisphenol that may be used to prepare the polylactone diol is 4,4′-isopropylidenebisphenol. An example of a hydrogenated bisphenol that may be used to prepare the polylactone diol is 4,4′-isopropylidenebiscyclohexanol.

The lactone used to prepare the polylactone diol has from 3 to 8 carbon atoms in the cyclic lactone ring and may be represented by the following formula,

wherein h is an integer from 1 to 6, e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6, R7, R8 and R9 are each selected independently from hydrogen, C1–C1-2 alkyl, C5–C6 cycloalkyl, C1–C6 alkoxy, benzyl and phenyl, provided that at least h+2 of the total number of R7, R8 and R9 groups are hydrogen. Typically R7, R8 and R9 are each hydrogen.

Examples of lactones that may be used to prepare the polylactone diol include, but are not limited to: beta-propiolactone; gamma-butyrolactone; beta-butyrolactone; delta-valerolactone; alpha-methyl-gamma-butyrolactone; beta-methyl-gamma-butyrolactone; gamma-valerolactone; epsilon-caprolactone; monomethyl-, monoethyl-, monopropyl-, monoisopropyl- etc. through monododecyl epsilon-caprolactones; methoxy and ethoxy epsilon-caprolactones; cyclohexyl epsilon-caprolactones; phenyl epsilon-caprolactones; benzyl epsilon-caprolactones; zeta-enatholactone; and eta-caprylactone. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, R7, R8 and R9 are each hydrogen, h is 4 and the lactone is epsilon-caprolactone.

Polyether polyols are generally known. Examples of polyether polyols include various polyoxyalkylene polyols, polyalkoxylated polyols, e.g., poly(oxytetramethylene)diols, and mixtures thereof. The polyoxyalkylene polyols can be prepared, according to well-known methods, by condensing alkylene oxide, or a mixture of alkylene oxide using acid or base catalyzed addition, with a polyhydric initiator or a mixture of polyhydric initiators such as ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, glycerol, sorbitol and the like. Illustrative alkylene oxides include ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, butylene oxide, amylene oxide, aralkylene oxides, e.g., styrene oxide, and the halogenated alkylene oxides such as trichlorobutylene oxide and so forth. The more preferred alkylene oxides include propylene oxide and ethylene oxide or a mixture thereof using random or step-wise oxyalkylation. Examples of such polyoxyalkylene polyols include polyoxyethylene, i.e., polyethylene glycol, polyoxypropylene, i.e., polypropylene glycol.

Polyalkoxylated polyols may be represented by the following graphic formula V,

wherein a and b are each a positive number, the sum of a and b being from 2 to 70, R4 and R5 are each hydrogen, methyl or ethyl, preferably hydrogen or methyl and D is a divalent linking group selected from straight or branched chain alkylene (usually containing from 1 to 8 carbon atoms), phenylene, C1–C9 alkyl substituted phenylene or a group represented by the aforementioned graphic formula IV. Such materials may be prepared by methods that are well known in the art. One such commonly used method involves reacting a polyol, e.g., 4,4′-isopropylidenediphenol, with an oxinane containing substance, for example ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, α-butylene oxide or β-butylene oxide, to form what is commonly referred to as an ethoxylated, propoxylated or butoxylated polyol having hydroxy functionality.

Examples of polyols suitable for use in preparing the polyalkoxylated polyols include low molecular weight polyols; phenylene diols such as ortho, meta and para dihydroxy benzene; alkyl substituted phenylene diols such as 2,6-dihydroxytoluene, 3-methylcatechol, 4-methylcatechol, 2-hydroxybenzyl alcohol, 3-hydroxybenzyl alcohol, and 4-hydroxybenzyl alcohol; dihydroxybiphenyls such as 4,4′-dihydroxybiphenyl and 2,2′-dihydroxybiphenyl; bisphenols such as 4,4′-isopropylidenediphenol; 4,4′-oxybisphenol; 4,4′-dihydroxybenzenephenone; 4,4′-thiobisphenol; phenolphthalein; bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)methane; 4,4′-(1,2-ethenediyl)bisphenol; and 4,4′-sulfonylbisphenol; halogenated bisphenols such as 4,4′-isopropylidenebis(2,6-dibromophenol), 4,4′-isopropylidenebis(2,6-dichlorophenol) and 4,4′-isopropylidenebis(2,3,5,6-tetrachlorophenol); and biscyclohexanols, which can be prepared by hydrogenating the corresponding bisphenols, such as 4,4′-isopropylidene-biscyclohexanol; 4,4′-oxybiscyclohexanol; 4,4′-thiobiscyclohexanol; and bis(4-hydroxycyclohexanol)methane.

The polyether polyols also include the generally known poly(oxytetramethylene)diols or polytetrahydrofuran diols prepared by the polymerization of tetrahydrofuran in the presence of Lewis acid catalysts such as boron trifluoride, tin (IV) chloride and sulfonyl chloride.

In one contemplated embodiment, the polyether polyols are selected from the group polyoxyalkylene polyols, polyalkoxylated polyols, poly(oxytetramethylene)diols or mixtures thereof.

Amide-containing polyols are generally known and typically are prepared from the reaction of diacids or lactones and low molecular weight polyols, e.g., aliphatic diols, triols, etc., with diamines or aminoalcohols as described hereinafter. For example, amide-containing polyols may be prepared by the reaction of neopentyl glycol, adipic acid and hexamethylenediamine. The amide-containing polyols may also be prepared through aminolysis by the reaction, for example, of carboxylates, carboxylic acids, or lactones with amino alcohols. Examples of suitable diamines and amino alcohols include hexamethylenediamines, ethylenediamines, phenylenediamine, monoethanolamine, diethanolamine, isophorone diamine and the like.

Polyhydric polyvinyl alcohols are generally known and can be prepared, for example, by the polymerization of vinyl acetate in the presence of suitable initiators followed by hydrolysis of at least a portion of the acetate moieties. In the hydrolysis process, hydroxyl groups are formed which are attached directly to the polymer backbone. In addition to homopolymers, copolymers of vinyl acetate and monomers such as vinyl chloride can be prepared and hydrolyzed in similar fashion to form polyhydric polyvinyl alcohol-polyvinyl chloride copolymers.

Epoxy-containing compounds that may be used in the practice of the present invention may be selected from the compounds represented by the following graphic formulae I, II, III or a mixture thereof.

In graphic formulae I, II and III, R1 is hydrogen or C1–C3 alkyl. Letter n is an integer selected from one, two, three or four. When n is equal to one in graphic formula I, A is selected from C2–C20 alkyl, substituted C2–C20 alkyl, C3–C20 cycloalkyl, substituted C3–C20 cycloalkyl; the unsubstituted or substituted aryl groups, phenyl and naphthyl; aryl(C1–C3)alkyl, substituted aryl(C1–C3)alkyl, acryloxy, methacryloxy; the group —C(O)Y, wherein Y is C2–C20 alkyl, C1–C6 alkoxy or aryl; or the group —R—(OR)m—OH or —(OR)m—OH wherein R is C2–C4 alkylene and m is an integer from 1 to 20. The substituents of the alkyl and cycloalkyl groups are carboxy, hydroxy and/or C1–C3 alkoxy. The substituents of the aryl and aryl(C1–C3)alkyl groups are carboxy, hydroxy, C1–C3 alkoxy and/or C1–C3 alkyl. When n is from two to four, A is selected from C2–C20 alkylene, substituted C2–C20 alkylene, C3–C20 cycloalkylene, substituted C3–C20 cycloalkylene; the unsubstituted or substituted arylene groups, phenylene and naphthylene; aryl(C1—C3)alkylene, substituted aryl(C1–C3)alkylene; the group —C(O)Z(O)C—, wherein Z is C2–C20 alkylene or arylene; the group —R—(OR)m— or —(OR)m—, wherein R and m are the same as defined hereinbefore; phthaloyl, isophthathoyl, terephthaloyl, hydroxyl-substituted phthaloyl, hydroxy-substituted isophthaloyl, hydroxy-substituted terephthaloyl; or a group represented by the following graphic formula IV:

wherein R2 and R3 are each C1–C4 alkyl, chlorine or bromine; p and q are each an integer from 0 to 4;

is the divalent benzene group; or G is —O—, —S—, —CH2—, or —C(CH3)2—, when

is the divalent cyclohexane group. The substituents of the alkylene and cycloalkylene groups are carboxy, hydroxy and/or C1–C3 alkoxy. The substituents of the aryl and aryl(C1–C3)alkylene groups are carboxy, hydroxy, C1–C3 alkoxy and/or C1–C3 alkyl.

In one contemplated embodiment, R1 is hydrogen or methyl. When n is one, A is selected from C2–C20 alkyl, hydroxyl-substituted C2–C20 alkyl, C3–C20 cycloalkyl, hydroxyl-substituted C3–C20 cycloalkyl, phenyl, naphthyl, aryl(C1–C3)alkyl; the group —C(O)Y, wherein Y is C2–C20 alkyl, C1–C6 alkoxy or aryl; the group —R—(OR)m—OH or —(OR)m—OH, wherein R is C2–C4 alkylene and m is an integer from 1 to 20; acryloxy or methacryloxy. When n is from two to four, A is selected from C2–C20 alkylene, hydroxyl-substituted C2–C20 alkylene, C3–C20 cycloalkylene, phenylene, naphthylene, aryl(C1–C3)alkylene; the groups —R—(OR)m— or —(OR)m—, wherein R and m are the same as defined hereinbefore; phthaloyl, isophthathoyl, terephthaloyl, or a group represented by graphic formula IV wherein R2 and R3 are each C1–C4 alkyl, chlorine or bromine; p and q are each an integer from 0 to 4;

represents a divalent benzene group or a divalent cyclohexane group; G is —O—, —C(O)—, —CH2—, or —(C6H4)— when

is the divalent benzene group, or G is —O— or —CH2—, when

is the divalent cyclohexane group.

B is selected from C2–C20 alkyl, C3–C20 cycloalkyl; the unsubstituted and hydroxyl-substituted aryl groups, phenyl and naphthyl; or aryl(C1–C3)alkyl.

In another contemplated embodiment, R1 is hydrogen. When n is one, A is selected from C2–C10 alkyl, phenyl, the group —R—(OR)m—OH, or —(OR)m—OH, wherein R is C2–C4 alkylene and m is an integer from 1 to 20. When n is from two to four, A is selected from C2–C10 alkylene, phenylene, the group —R—(OR)m— or —(OR)m—, wherein R and m are the same as defined hereinbefore; and phthaloyl. B is selected from C2–C10 alkyl, phenyl or phenyl(C1–C3)alkyl.

The combination of organic polyols and epoxy-containing compounds for use in the transfer process or in the removable imbibition composition may be in a weight proportion of from 1:99 to 99:1; 5:95 to 95:5; 10:90 to 90:10; 50:50 or in a proportion between any of these values, inclusive of the recited ratios, e.g., from 30:70 to 60:40.

The amount of KEA used in the removable imbibition composition is not critical provided that it is a photochromic performance improving amount. Such an amount may range from 0.1 to 99.9 weight percent of the imbibition composition. In one contemplated embodiment, the amount of KEA ranges from 1 to 75 weight percent of the imbibition composition. In another contemplated embodiment, the amount of KEA ranges from 2 to 50 weight percent. In a still further contemplated embodiment, the amount of KEA ranges from 3 to 30 weight percent. The amount of KEA used may range between any combination of these values, inclusive of the recited ranges, e.g., from 0.15 to 99.85 weight percent, provided that the amount used is a photochromic performance improving amount.

The improvement in the photochromic performance resulting from the addition of the KEA to the imbibition composition is evident by a higher rating in the Photochromic Performance Test than that of a composition without the KEA. The percent improvement can be determined by subtracting the rating of the composition without KEA from the rating of the composition with the KEA, dividing the result by the rating of the composition without KEA and multiplying by 100. The higher the percent improvement, the greater the effect of the KEA and the more desirable the result. For example, percent improvements of 10, 15, 20, 30, 50, 90, 100, 200, 500, 1000, 1500 and higher are more desirable than percent improvements of from 1 to less than 10.

The photochromic compounds used in the photochromic composition of the present invention may be used alone or in combination with one of more other appropriate complementary organic photochromic compounds, i.e., organic photochromic compounds having at least one activated absorption maxima within the range of 400 and 700 nanometers, and which color when activated to an appropriate hue.

Other complementary photochromic substances contemplated are metal-dithiozonates, e.g., mercury dithizonates which are described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,361,706; and fulgides and fulgimides, e.g., the 3-furyl and 3-thienyl fulgides and fulgimides, which are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,931,220 at column 20, line 5 through column 21, line 38.

The photochromic articles of the present invention may contain one photochromic compound or a mixture of photochromic compounds, as desired.

Each of the photochromic substances described herein may be used in amounts (or in a ratio) such that a polymeric substrate to which the photochromic composition is associated, exhibits a desired resultant color, e.g., a substantially neutral color when activated with unfiltered sunlight, i.e., as near a neutral color as possible given the colors of the activated photochromic compounds. Neutral gray and neutral brown colors are preferred. Further discussion of neutral colors and ways to describe colors may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,645,767 column 12, line 66 to column 13, line 19.

The amount of the photochromic compounds to be used in the imbibition composition, which is incorporated into a polymeric organic host material, is not critical provided that a sufficient amount is used to produce a photochromic effect discernible to the naked eye upon activation. Generally, such amount can be described as a photochromic amount. In the process of the present invention, this amount may be transferred onto the polymeric host all at once or by first transferring a portion of the amount in one step followed by the remainder in one or more subsequent transfers prior to, after or with the transfer of a photochromic performance improving amount of KEA. The particular amount used depends often upon the intensity of color desired upon irradiation thereof and upon the method used to incorporate the photochromic composition. Typically, the more photochromic compound incorporated, the greater is the color intensity up to a certain limit.

The relative amounts of the aforesaid photochromic compounds used will vary and depend in part upon the relative intensities of the color of the activated species of such compounds, the ultimate color desired and the method of application of the photochromic composition to the polymeric substrate. In a typical commercial imbibition process, the amount of total photochromic compound incorporated into a receptive polymeric substrate may range from about 0.05 to about 2.0, e.g., from 0.2 to about 1.0, milligrams per square centimeter of surface to which the photochromic compound is incorporated or applied.

The amount of photochromic compound incorporated into the imbibition composition may range from 0.1 to 99.9 weight percent based on the weight of the composition. In one series of contemplated embodiments in which the imbibition composition is a combination of KEA and photochromic compound, the amount of photochromic compound ranges from 25 to 99 weight percent, from 50 to 98 weight percent or from 70 to 97 weight percent. The amount of photochromic compounds used in the imbibition composition of the present invention may range between any combination of these values, inclusive of the recited ranges, e.g., from 0.15 to 99.85 weight percent.

In another series of contemplated embodiments in which there are three or more components in the imbibition composition, the amount of photochromic compound is equivalent to the amount of KEA, e.g., 5 weight percent of each; is less than the amount of KEA, e.g., 4 weight percent photochromic and 16 weight percent KEA; or is more than the amount of KEA, e.g., 40 weight percent photochromic compound and 10 weight percent KEA. The sum of all the components in the imbibition composition is 100 percent.

In a further series of contemplated embodiments, the photochromic compounds are included in imbibition composition A while the KEA(s) are included in imbibition composition B. An organic polymeric host could be treated with imbibition composition A follow-by treatment with imbibition composition B or vice a versa. Such treatments could be done at different times, e.g., a lens could be treated with imbibition composition A, shipped to another processing facility and later treated with imbibition composition B.

In a still further series of contemplated embodiments, a portion of the photochromic performance improving amount of kinetic enhancing additives is transferred prior to transferring the photochromic compounds and the remainder of the photochromic performance improving amount of kinetic enhancing additives. Alternatively, a portion of the photochromic amount of photochromic compounds is transferred prior to transferring the kinetic enhancing additives and the remainder of the photochromic amount of photochromic compounds. A process in which a portion of the photochromic performance improving amount of kinetic enhancing additives and a portion of the photochromic amount of photochromic compounds is transferred prior to transferring the remainder of each is also contemplated. In each of the aforementioned transfer processes, one or more transfer or imbibition steps may be used.

When the carrier is a solvent, the imbibition composition may be deposited on the surface of the polymeric substrate using a single step imbibition process or a multiple step process which may include high boiling liquids and the application of ultrasonic energy as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,789,015 or aqueous liquids and the application of microwave radiation as described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 20020040511A1; the imbibition composition may be applied to a temporary support such as a sheet of paper which is placed directly on the polymeric substrate as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,286,957; the imbibition composition may utilize a non-polar solvent, which is used in a two-layer immersion bath as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,975,696; or the imbibition composition may be used in a different method known in the art for transferring such compositions into polymeric substrates, e.g., by vacuum deposition and thermal treatment as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,914,193.

When the carrier in the imbibition composition includes a polymeric resin, the resin essentially serves as a film-forming binder for the other components of the composition. The affinity between the carrier and the other components, i.e., the solubility of the photochromic compounds and the KEA in the carrier, should be sufficient to form a homogeneous solution and permit ready removal or transfer of these compounds from the resin film at the aforementioned concentrations. Also, the polymeric resin should not adhere strongly to the polymeric substrate to which it is applied so that it can be readily removed from the surface of the substrate without leaving marks on the surface.

Adjuvant materials may also be incorporated into the imbibition composition. For example, ultraviolet light absorbers and/or stabilizers may be included to improve the fatigue resistance of the photochromic substances. Adjuvants, such as hindered amine light stabilizers (HALS), antioxidants, e.g., polyphenolic antioxidants, ultraviolet light absorbers, such as asymmetric diaryloxalamide (oxanilide) compounds, and singlet oxygen quenchers, e.g., a nickel ion complete with an organic ligand, or, mixtures of such materials are contemplated. They may be used alone, in combination or in combination with the additional conventional ingredients described hereinafter. Such stabilizers are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,720,356, 5,391,327 and 5,770,115.

The imbibition compositions used in the process of the present invention may further comprise additional conventional ingredients that impart desired physical characteristics to the composition or the resultant layer; that are required for the process used to apply the imbibition composition to the substrate; and/or that enhance the layer made therefrom. Such additional ingredients include rheology control agents, e.g., silica, and leveling agents, e.g., surfactants.

The imbibition composition, i.e., KEA, photochromic compounds, and optional ingredients, such as adjuvants and convention/ingredients can be prepared by any conventional technique. For example, the individual components may be mixed and used neat or may be dissolved in appropriate solvents before combining or each of the components may be sequentially dissolved or incorporated into a suitable carrier, with heat, if necessary.

Alternatively, multiple-imbibition composition and imbibing steps may be used to produce the photochromic article of the present invention. In one contemplated embodiment, a first imbibition composition is used for the photochromic compounds and stabilizers, a second includes the KEA and a third imbibition composition includes both the photochromic compound(s) and KEA(s).

The imbibition composition is applied to at least one principal surface, i.e., a flat or curved surface other than the side of the polymeric host, by techniques known in the art that are suitable to produce a mottle-free coating or film of uniform thickness. In one contemplated embodiment, the composition is applied in such a manner that the resulting film is substantially dry as soon as it is formed, i.e., the readily vaporizable solvent is substantially volatilized as the composition is applied to the receptor surface of the plastic host, thereby leaving a substantially dry film. Application techniques that may be employed include spraying, brushing, curtain coating, spin-coating, dip coating and use of a draw-down blade or wire bar.

Before applying the imbibition composition to the polymeric host, the surface of the polymer to which the composition is to be applied is preferably cleaned. Cleaning may be accomplished by washing the surface with an aqueous medium, e.g., soapy water, to remove dust and dirt; washing the surface with an organic solvent such as methylethylketone to remove any organic film present on the surface; and/or eliminating static charges that are present on the surface of the plastic material. Elimination of static electricity can be accomplished by commercially available equipment which ionize the air above the surface, thereby producing a conductive path which allows the static charge to drain off or otherwise be neutralized.

The surface of the plastic material to which the imbibition composition is applied should be receptive to imbibition of the photochromic compound(s) and KEA during the heating step. If the receptor surface is not amenable to imbibition, it can be treated to permit improved diffusion of the photochromic composition into the subsurface of the polymeric host, e.g., by physically or chemically etching the surface. A receptive surface can be achieved usually by undercuring slightly the polymer during its formation. Such techniques are conventional in the polymerization art.

Following application of the imbibition composition to the surface(s) of the polymeric organic host material, the substantially dry film or coating is permitted to completely dry. Drying can be conveniently conducted at room temperature in air; but, other conditions of drying which avoid crystallization of the KEA, photochromic compound or other ingredient within the resin film or coating may be used as the occasion warrants. Thereafter, the coated polymeric article is heated substantially uniformly at temperatures below the boiling temperature of the photochromic compound used. Heating can be accomplished by any convenient technique that results in substantially uniform heating of the coated polymeric host. In one contemplated embodiment, heating is accomplished in a conventional hot air recirculating oven, which allows for uniform heating and hence a constant driving force for transfer of the photochromic compound and KEA into the polymeric host. Heating may also be accomplished in a vacuum or with use of an inert, e.g., nitrogen atmosphere.

The temperatures to which the coated polymeric article is heated will vary and depend on the boiling point and vapor pressure of the particular photochromic compound and KEA utilized as well as the softening temperature of the synthetic polymeric article. Such temperatures should preferably be near to but below the boiling point of the photochromic compound and KEA and below the softening temperature of the synthetic polymeric article. Moreover, such temperatures, i.e., photochromic transfer or incorporation temperatures, should be such as to avoid decomposition (pyrolysis) of the photochromic compound, as well as the KEA. Hence, the transfer temperatures chosen are sufficient to raise the vapor pressure of the photochromic compound and KEA adequately to permit its transfer into the polymeric host without significant decomposition to the compounds and softening of the polymeric host.

As the boiling points and vapor pressures of KEA and photochromic compounds, e.g., chromene-type photochromic compounds, will vary depending on the nature of the compound and their substituents, one temperature range applicable to all photochromic compositions cannot be described. However, given the above requirements one skilled in the art can readily determine an appropriate temperature for heating the coated polymeric article. Transfer temperatures of between 5° C. and 50° C., less than the boiling temperature of the photochromic compound and the KEA are contemplated except where significant decomposition of the compounds is experienced at such temperatures. Generally, in the imbibition art, temperatures used in association with organic photochromic compounds and polymeric lenses are between 100° C. and 160° C. In one contemplated embodiment, a transfer temperature of between 5 and 10° C. less than the boiling temperature of the photochromic compound and other transferable components is used.

The coated polymeric article is maintained at the above-described transfer temperatures, for a time sufficient to allow a substantial portion, i.e., a photochromic amount, of the photochromic compound and a photochromic performance improving amount of KEA, to diffuse into and penetrate beneath the 10 surface of the plastic article. Typically, the heating period in commercial imbibition processes is from one hour to twelve hours, usually between four and nine hours at the transfer temperatures. When multiple imbibition compositions and imbibition steps are employed to separately transfer the photochromic compound(s), kinetic enhancing additives and/or combinations thereof, different time intervals for each step may be required to cost effectively produce a photochromic article demonstrating improved performance.

The mechanism by which the photochromic compound and the KEA transfer from the imbibition composition, resin film or coating adhered to the surface of the polymeric host into the polymeric host material has not been established with certainty. It is postulated that thermal diffusion, sublimation and condensation or a combination of the aforesaid mechanisms may accomplish transfer. Whatever the specific mechanism(s), the photochromic compound and the KEA permeate into the polymeric substrate, usually into the subsurface regions thereof, and become incorporated within the polymeric host material. In this manner, a photochromic amount of the photochromic substance and a photochromic performance improving amount of KEA are transferred into and across the planar surface of the plastic host.

Following transfer of the photochromic and kinetic enhancing additive into the polymeric article, the coated polymer is allowed to cool, e.g., to room temperature, and subsequently the residual coating or resin film, its concentration of the KEA and photochromic compounds reduced, is removed from the surface of the polymeric host. Removal of the photochromic compound and KEA-depleted film may be accomplished by any suitable technique; preferably a technique that does not impair the optical quality of the surface of the plastic. Conveniently, the depleted film is stripped from the polymeric substrate by contacting the film with a suitable solvent such as soapy water or organic solvents such as trichloroethylene, methylethylketone, methylisobutylketone, methylethylketone-toluene mixture, or other solvents such as: acetone, ethylene dichloride, chloroform and chlorobenzenes. The same solvent used to prepare the imbibition composition may be used to remove the residual resin film.

A suitable method for contacting the film or coating with organic solvent is in a vapor degreasing unit wherein the coated substrate is exposed to the vapors of the selected solvent(s) which condense on and run off the surface of the polymeric material, thereby washing the photochromic and/or KEA-depleted resin film or coating from the surface. Alternatively, the resin film or coating can be removed by dipping the polymeric substrate into a bath of the solvent, spraying the solvent on the coated substrate or physically stripping the film or coating from the substrate. After the photochromic and KEA-depleted or spent film or coating has been removed from the surface of the polymeric article, the surface can be washed with water, solvent or a suitable aqueous medium such as, for example, soap or detergent solutions and dried. If desired, the polymeric article can be tinted with conventional disperse and soluble dyes used in the tinting of organic plastic materials using techniques well known in the art, e.g., a conventional dye bath. Thereafter, the tinted polymeric article is washed, e.g., with soapy water, and dried. Tinting of the polymeric article can be performed immediately after removal of the spent resin film or coating and before cleaning the surface. Alternatively, tinting can be performed before the photochromic composition is applied.

The polymeric host material will usually be transparent, but may be translucent or even opaque. The host material need only be pervious to that portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, which activates the photochromic substance, i.e., that wavelength of ultraviolet (UV) light that produces the open or colored form of the substance and that portion of the visible spectrum that includes the absorption maximum wavelength of the substance in its UV activated form, i.e., the open form.

In one contemplated embodiment, the color of the host is such that it does not mask the color of the activated form of the photochromic compounds, i.e., so the change in color is readily apparent to the observer. In another contemplated embodiment, the polymeric organic host material is a solid transparent or optically clear material, e.g., materials suitable for optical applications, such as plano, ophthalmic and contact lenses, windows, automotive transparencies, e.g., windshields, aircraft transparencies, plastic sheeting, polymeric films, etc.

One polymeric organic host material which may be used with the photochromic imbibition composition described herein is a non-elastomeric poly(urea-urethane). Non-elastomeric poly(urea-urethane) is defined herein as the reaction product of reactants comprising (a) at least one polyol, e.g., diol; (b) at least one polyisocyanate having at least two isocyanato groups; (c) at least one polyamine having at least two amino groups, each amino group being independently selected from primary amino and secondary amino; and optionally, (d) at least one polyol having at least three hydroxyl groups. In one contemplated embodiment, the number of isocyanato groups of the isocyanate reactants is greater than the number of hydroxyl groups of the polyol reactants.

The preparation of poly(urea-urethane) is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/766,554, filed Jan. 19, 2001 and in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,866,242; 5,811,506; 5,962,617; and 5,962,619.

Transparent copolymers and blends of transparent polymers are also suitable as host materials. In one contemplated embodiment, the host material or substrate for the imbibition composition is an optically clear polymerized organic material prepared from a thermoplastic polycarbonate resin, such as the carbonate-linked resin derived from bisphenol A and phosgene, which is sold under the trademark, LEXAN; a polyester, such as the material sold under the trademark, MYLAR; a poly(methyl methacrylate), such as the material sold under the trademark, PLEXIGLAS; polymerizates of a polyol(allyl carbonate) monomer, especially diethylene glycol bis(allyl carbonate), which monomer is sold under the trademark CR-39, and polymerizates of copolymers of a polyol (allyl carbonate), e.g., diethylene glycol bis(allyl carbonate), with other copolymerizable monomeric materials, such as copolymers with vinyl acetate, e.g., copolymers of from 80–90 percent diethylene glycol bis(allyl carbonate) and 10–20 percent vinyl acetate, particularly 80–85 percent of the bis(allyl carbonate) and 15–20 percent vinyl acetate, and copolymers with a polyurethane having terminal diacrylate functionality, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,360,653 and 4,994,208; and copolymers with aliphatic urethanes, the terminal portion of which contain allyl or acrylyl functional groups, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,200,483; poly(vinyl acetate), polyvinylbutyral, polyurethane, polymers of diethylene glycol dimethacrylate monomers, diisopropenyl benzene monomers, ethoxylated bisphenol A dimethacrylate monomers, ethylene glycol bismethacrylate monomers, poly(ethylene glycol) bismethacrylate monomers, ethoxylated phenol bismethacrylate monomers and ethoxylated trimethylol propane triacrylate monomers; cellulose acetate, cellulose propionate, cellulose butyrate, cellulose acetate butyrate, polystyrene and copolymers of styrene with methyl methacrylate, vinyl acetate and acrylonitrile.

More particularly contemplated is use of the imbibition composition of the present invention with optical organic resin monomers used to produce optically clear polymeric coatings and polymerizates, i.e., materials suitable for optical applications, such as lenses for use in a pair of spectacles, e.g., plano or ophthalmic spectacle lenses, or for use as contact lenses. Optically clear polymerizates may have a refractive index that may range from about 1.35 to about 1.75, e.g., from about 1.495 to about 1.66.

Other examples of polymeric organic host materials are thermoplastic or thermosetting coatings described in the Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Fourth Edition, Volume 6, pages 669 to 760. In one contemplated embodiment, thermosetting coatings are used. The photochromic or nonphotochromic polymeric coating applied to the surface of the substrate and imbibed with the imbibition composition of the present invention containing KEA and/or photochromic compounds may be a coating that upon curing forms a polymeric layer selected from polyurethanes, aminoplast resins, polysilanes, poly(meth)acrylates, e.g., polyacrylates and polymethacrylates, polyanhydrides, polyacrylamides, or epoxy resins, e.g., polyacid cured epoxy resins.

Specifically contemplated as host materials are polymerizates of Spectralite® lenses sold by Sola International, TRIVEX™ lenses and optical resins sold by PPG Industries, Inc. under the CR-designation, e.g., CR-307 and CR-407, and polymerizates prepared for use as hard or soft contact lenses. Methods for producing both types of contact lenses are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,166,345, column 11, line 52, to column 12, line 52. Additional polymerizates contemplated for use with the photochromic compositions of the present invention are polymerizates used to form soft contact lenses with high moisture content described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,965,630 and extended wear contact lenses described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,965,631.

Photochromic articles prepared using the imbibition composition of the present invention may be coated with a silica, titania, and/or zirconia-based hard coating material. Alternatively, an organic hard coating material of the ultraviolet curable type may be applied so as to form a hard surface layer. Application of such protective coatings, e.g., abrasion resistant coatings, may be by any of the methods used in coating technology such as, for example, spray coating, spin coating, spread coating, curtain coating, dip coating or roll-coating. Other coatings and/or surface treatments, e.g., antireflective surface, hydrophobic coating, etc., may also be applied individually or sequentially to at least one surface of the photochromic articles of the present invention. An antireflective coating, e.g., a monolayer or multilayer of metal oxides, metal fluorides, or other materials, may be deposited onto the photochromic articles, e.g., lenses, of the present invention through vacuum evaporation, sputtering, or some other method.

The present invention is more particularly described in the following examples that are intended as illustrative only, since numerous modifications and variations therein will be apparent to those skilled in the art.

Examples 1–3 and Comparative Example 1 demonstrate the effects on the Photochromic Performance Rating of including 5 grams of trimethylolpropane triglycidyl ether (TMPTGE), poly(ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether (PEG(DGE)) or polycaprolactone diol (PCLD) in the first photochromic imbibition composition as compared to the first photochromic imbibition composition without kinetic enhancing additive (KEA).

Examples 4–10 and Comparative Example 2 demonstrate the effects on the Photochromic Performance Ratings of including 5 grams of TMPTGE, PEG(DGE), PCLD, Poly(ethylene glycol)600 (PEG-600), polytetrahydrofuran (PTHF), poly(ethylene glycol)900 (PEG-900) and 1,6-hexane diol (HD) in the second photochromic imbibition composition as compared to the second photochromic imbibition composition without KEA. The results of testing on Examples 1–10 and CE 1 and 2 are included in Table 1.

Examples 11, 12 and CE1 were used in two step imbibition studies to demonstrate the effects on the Photochromic Performance Rating of imbibing Example 11 containing 15% TMPTGE without photochromic compounds followed by CE1 or Example 12 containing 10% TMPTGE in the first photochromic imbibition composition as compared to only imbibing CE1 or Example 12. The results are listed in Table 2.

Examples 12, 15, CE1 and CE2 were used in two step imbibition studies to demonstrate the effects on the Photochromic Performance Rating of first imbibing CE1 or CE2 followed by the imbibition of Example 12 or Example 15 containing 10% TMPTGE in the second photochromic imbibition composition over a period of 1,2 and 3 hours as compared to imbibing only CE1 or CE2. The results are listed in Table 3.

Examples 12, 13 (10% PEG-900) 14 (10% PCLD) and CE1 were used in a study in which the imbibed lenses were coated with HI-GARD® 1030 a solgel-type hardcoating solution (HC); HI-GARD® 1030 solution and Reflection Free antireflective coating (HC & AR); or no coating was applied. The effects of the coatings on the Photochromic Performance Rating as well as the adhesion of the coatings to the lenses was tested. These results are listed in Table 4.

Example 15 (10% TMPTGE), 16 (10% PEG-900), 17 (10% PCLD) and CE2 were tested in the same way as Examples 12, 13, 14 and CE1. The results are listed in Table 5.

Examples 15, 17, 18 (5% TMPTGE and 5% PCLD) and CE2 demonstrate the effects of mixing two KEA's on the Photochromic Performance Rating as compared to testing single KEA's or no KEA. These results are listed in Table 6.

Example 19 and CE3 demonstrate the effects on the Photochromic Performance Rating of using the first poly(urea-urethane) substrate imbibed with PEG(DGE) in the third photochromic imbibition composition as compared to the CE3 without PEG(DGE). Results are listed in Table 7.

Example 20 and CE4 demonstrate the effects on the Photochromic Performance Rating of using the second poly(urea-urethane) substrate imbibed with PEG(DGE) in the third photochromic imbibition composition as compared to CE4 without PEG(DGE). Results are listed in Table 7.

Examples 21, 22 and CE5 demonstrate the effect on the Photochromic Performance Rating of using the first poly(urea-urethane) substrate imbibed with PCLD or PEG-900 in the fourth photochromic imbibition composition as compared to CE5 without PCLD or PEG-900. Results are listed in Table 7.

Examples 23, 24 and CE6 demonstrate the effect on the Photochromic Performance Rating of using the second poly(urea-urethane) substrate imbibed with PCLD or PEG-900 in the fourth photochromic imbibition composition as compared to CE6 without PCLD or PEG-900. Results are listed in Table 7.

EXAMPLE 1

The following materials were added in the order and the manner described to a container suitable for use with a BRINKMAN PT-3000 homogenizer:

Material

Weight (grams)

Charge-1

2-Ethoxy ethyl ether

50.0

Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol

30.0

n-Methyl pyrrolidone

20.0

(TMPTGE)(1)

5.0

Hydroxypropyl cellulose

12.0

Silica

0.9

Charge-2

Photochromic No. 1(2)

2.28

Photochromic No. 2(3)

0.48

Photochromic No. 3(4)

0.54

Photochromic No. 4(5)

2.70

TINUVIN ® 144 UV Stabilizer(6)

2.10

IRGANOX ® 3114 Antioxidant(7)

0.90

(1)Trimethylolpropane triglycidyl ether having a formula weight of 302.

(2)A photochromic naphtho[1,2-b]pyran that exhibits a blue color when irradiated with ultraviolet light.

(3)A photochromic naphtho[1,2-b]pyran that exhibits a blue-green color when irradiated with ultraviolet light.

(4)A photochromic naphtho[1,2-b]pyran that exhibits a yellow-orange color when irradiated with ultraviolet light.

(5)A photochromic naphtho[1,2-b]pyran that exhibits a yellow-orange color when irradiated with ultraviolet light.

The procedure of Example 1 was followed except that trimethylolpropane triglycidyl ether was replaced by an equal amount of poly(ethylene glycol)diglycidyl ether (PEG(DGE)) having a number-average molecular weight of 526.

EXAMPLE 3

The procedure of Example 1 was followed except that trimethylolpropane triglycidyl ether was replaced by an equal amount of polycaprolactone diol (PCLD) having an number-average molecular weight of 530.

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1

The procedure of Example 1 was followed except that trimethylolpropane triglycidyl ether was not included in the imbibition formulation.

EXAMPLE 4

The procedure of Example 1 was followed except that the following materials were used in Charge 2.

Material

Weight (grams)

Photochromic No. 5(8)

2.16

Photochromic No. 6(9)

0.54

Photochromic No. 7(10)

3.00

Photochromic No. 3

0.30

Tinuvin ® 144 UV Stabilizer

0.60

Irganox ® 3114 Antioxidant

1.2

Sanduvor 3058 UV Stabilizer(11)

1.2

(8)A photochromic naphtho[1,2-b]pyran that exhibits a blue-gray color when irradiated with ultraviolet light.

(9)A photochromic spironaphthoxazine that exhibits a green-blue color when irradiated with ultraviolet light.

(10)A naphtha[1,2-b]pyran that exhibits a blue color when irradiated with ultraviolet light.

The procedure of Example 4 was followed except that trimethylolpropane triglycidyl ether was replaced with an equal amount of poly(ethylene glycol)diglycidyl ether (PEG(DGE)) having a number-average molecular weight of 526.

EXAMPLE 6

The procedure of Example 4 was followed except that trimethylolpropane triglycidyl ether was replaced with an equal amount of polycaprolactone diol (PCLD) having a number-average molecular weight of 530.

EXAMPLE 7

The procedure of Example 4 was followed except that trimethylol propane triglycidyl ether was replaced with an equal amount of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG-600) having an number-average molecular weight of 600.

EXAMPLE 8

The procedure of Example 4 was followed except that trimethylol propane triglycidyl ether was replaced with an equal amount of TERETHANEG) 650 polyether glycol (PTHF) reported to be polytetrahydrofuran linear-chain polymer having a number-average molecular weight of 650.

EXAMPLE 9

The procedure of Example 4 was followed except that trimethylol propane triglycidyl ether was replaced with an equal amount of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG-900) having an number-average molecular weight of 900.

EXAMPLE 10

The procedure of Example 4 was followed except that trimethylol propane triglycidyl ether was replaced with an equal amount of 1,6-hexanediol (HD).

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2

The procedure of Example 4 was followed except that trimethylolpropane triglycidyl ether was not included in the imbibition formulation.

EXAMPLE 11

The procedure of Example 1 was followed except that trimethylolpropane triglycidyl ether was used at a level of 15 percent by weight, based on the total weight of Charge-1. Charge-2 was not used.

EXAMPLE 12

The procedure of Example 1 was followed except that trimethylolpropane triglycidyl ether was used at a level of 10 percent by weight, based on the total weight of Charges 1 and 2.

EXAMPLE 13

The procedure of Example 12 was followed except that trimethylolpropane triglycidyl ether was replaced by poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG-900).

EXAMPLE 14

The procedure of Example 12 was followed except that trimethylolpropane triglycidyl ether was replaced by polylcaprolactone diol (PCLD).

EXAMPLE 15

The procedure of Example 4 was followed except that trimethylolpropane triglycidyl ether was used at a level of 10 percent by weight, based on the total weight of Charge 1 and 2.

EXAMPLE 16

The procedure of Example 15 was followed except that trimethylolpropane triglycidyl ether was replaced by poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG-900).

EXAMPLE 17

The procedure of Example 15 was followed except that trimethylolpropane triglycidyl ether was replaced by polycaprolactone diol (PCLD).

EXAMPLE 18

The procedure of Example 15 was followed except that trimethylolpropane triglycidyl ether was used at a level of 5 percent by weight and 5 percent by weight of polycaprolactone diol was added.

EXAMPLE 19Part A

The following materials were added in the order and the manner described to a suitable reaction vessel equipped with an agitator, a thermometer, nitrogen inlet and heat/cooling capabilities.

Number of

Material

Equivalents

PCLD (400 EW)(12)

0.740

PCLD (200 EW)(13)

0.115

PCLD (1000 EW)(14)

0.025

Trimethylolpropane

0.120

DESMODUR W(15)

2.700

(12)Polycaprolactone diol having an equivalent weight of about 400.

(13)Polycaprolactone diol having an equivalent weight of about 200.

(14)Polycaprolactone diol having an equivalent weight of about 1000.

(15)Dicyclohexylmethane-4,4′-diisocyanate available from Bayer Corporation.

After addition of the materials, nitrogen was introduced into the vessel to provide a nitrogen blanket and the agitator was turned on. Heat was applied until the prepolymer reaction mixture reached a temperature of 250° F. (121° C.). Further heating was discontinued. The resulting exothermic reaction usually caused an increase in the temperature of the reaction mixture to about 280° F. (138° C.). If the temperature continued to rise above 280° F. (138° C.), cooling was applied. After the reaction temperature reached about 220° F. (104° C.), the prepolymer product was filtered through a 400 mesh filter. The resulting filtrate was cooled and transferred to a suitable container.

Part B

The following materials were added in the order and the manner described to a reaction injection molding (RIM) machine, such as the Max Mixer available from Max Machines:

Material

Weight (grams)

Charge-1

Product of Part A

50.00

Charge-2

Diethyltoluenediamine

12.50

Charge-1 was added to the container. Charge-2 was added and the contents were rapidly mixed in the Max Mixer.

Part C

The product of Part B was poured into molds measuring 60–80 mm that were treated with an external mold release agent, preheated to 150° C. and placed in an oven at 150° C. for 16 hours. Afterwards, the polymerizates were removed from the molds.

Part D

The following materials were added in the order and the manner described to a container suitable for use with a BRINKMAN PT-3000 homogenizer:

Material

Weight (grams)

Charge-1

2-Ethoxy ethyl ether

30.0

Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol

35.0

n-Methyl pyrrolidone

20.0

PEG(DGE)

10.0

Hydroxypropyl cellulose

12.0

Silica

0.9

Charge-2

Photochromic No. 1

4.3

Photochromic No. 2

1.7

SANDUVOR 3056 UV stabilizer

1.8

IRGANOX ® 3114 antioxidant

1.2

Charge-1 was added to the container and mixed by the homogenizer at a speed of 5000 rpm for 2 minutes or until the materials were dissolved. Charge-2 was added and the resulting mixture was heated and mixed until the materials were dissolved.

Part E

The solutions of Part D were imbibed into duplicate sample lenses prepared in Part C by applying the imbibition formulation onto the surface of the test lenses by spin coating. The average wet weight of the resin film that formed on the lens ranged from 0.35 to 0.40 milligrams per lens. The resin film was allowed to dry. The lenses were then heated in a hot-air oven at 135–140° C. for 8 hours. After cooling, the resin film was removed from the test samples by rinsing with water and wiping with an acetone soaked tissue.

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 3

The procedure of Example 19 was followed except that polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether was not included in Charge-1 of Part D. The amount of hydroxypropyl cellulose and silica remained the same. The amounts of the other materials were as follows:

Material

Weight (grams)

2-Ethoxy ethyl ether

35

Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol

35

n-Methyl pyrrolidone

20

EXAMPLE 20

The procedure of Example 19 was followed except that the following formulation was used in Part A to prepare the prepolymer.

Number of

Material

Equivalents

PCLD (400 EW)

0.75

PCLD (200 EW)

0.10

Trimethylolpropane

0.15

DESMODUR W

2.70

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 4

The procedure of Example 20 was followed except that polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether was not included in Charge-1 of Part D. The amount of hydroxypropyl cellulose and silica remained the same. The amounts of the other materials were the same as in Comparative Example 3.

EXAMPLE 21

The procedure of Example 19 was followed except that in Charge-1 of Part D, polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether (10 grams) was replaced with polycaprolactone diol (PCLD) (6.67 grams) having an number-average molecular weight of 530 and the following materials were used in Charge-2.

Material

Weight (grams)

Photochromic No. 3

2.28

Photochromic No. 4

0.48

Photochromic No. 5

0.54

Photochromic No. 6

2.70

TINUVIN ® 144 UV Stabilizer

2.1

IRGANOX ® 3114 antioxidant

0.9

EXAMPLE 22

The procedure of Example 21 was followed except that in Charge-1 of Part D, polycaprolactone diol was replaced with an equal amount of polyethylene glycol (PEG-900) having an number-average molecular weight of 900.

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 5

The procedure of Example 21 was followed except that polycaprolactone diol was not included in Charge-1 of Part D. The amount of hydroxypropyl cellulose and silica remained the same. The amounts of the other materials were the same as in Comparative Example 3.

EXAMPLE 23

The procedure of Example 22 was followed except that the following formulation was used in Part A to prepare the prepolymer.

Number of

Material

Equivalents

PCLD (400 EW)

0.75

PCLD (200 EW)

0.10

Trimethylolpropane

0.15

DESMODUR W

2.70

EXAMPLE 24

The procedure of Example 22 was followed except that the following formulation was used in Part A to prepare the prepolymer.

Number of

Material

Equivalents

PCLD (400 EW)

0.75

PCLD (200 EW)

0.10

Trimethylolpropane

0.15

DESMODUR W

2.70

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 6

The procedure of Example 23 was followed except that polycaprolactone diol was not included in Charge-1 of Part D. The amount of hydroxylpropyl cellulose and silica remained the same. The amounts of the other materials were the same as in Comparative Example 3.

EXAMPLE 25Part A

Testing of Examples 1–18 and Comparative Examples (CE) 1 and 2 was done with sample lenses cast from an optical resin sold by PPG Industries, Inc. under the designation CR-307. The sample lenses were washed with dishwashing detergent and water, rinsed with deionized water and wiped with an acetone soaked tissue prior to the application of the example solutions. The solutions of the Examples and Comparative Examples were imbibed into the sample lenses by applying a film of the imbibition formulation onto the surface of the test lenses by spin coating. The average wet weight of the resin film ranged from 0.35 to 0.40 milligrams per lens. The applied film was allowed to dry. The lenses were then heated in a hot-air oven at 135–140° C. for the time indicated in the tables. After cooling, the resin film was removed from the test samples by rinsing with water and wiping with an acetone soaked tissue. When a second imbibition step was included, as reported in Tables 2 and 3, it was done after removal of the first imbibition resin film.

Part B

The photochromic lenses prepared in Part A and the lenses of Examples 19–24 and Comparative Examples 3–6 were screened for ultraviolet absorbance and lenses having comparable UV absorbance at 390 nanometers were tested for photochromic response on an optical bench. Most lenses were tested in duplicate and the results were averaged except the lenses subjected to adhesion testing reported in Tables 4 and 5, for which single lenses were tested and the lenses whose results are reported in Tables 6 and 7. The ultraviolet absorbance value gives an indication of the amount of photochromic compounds in the lens. The optical bench was maintained at a temperature of 72° F. (22° C.). The lenses of Examples 19–24, and Comparative Examples 3–6 were activated for 15 minutes and the ΔOD was measured after the first 30 seconds and then after 15 minutes. The other imbibed lenses were activated for 15 minutes and the AOD was measured after 15 minutes.

Prior to testing on the optical bench, the photochromic test squares were exposed to 365 nm ultraviolet light for about 10 minutes at a distance of about 14 cm from the lamps to activate the photochromic compound. The samples were then placed under a halogen lamp (500 W, 120V) for about 10 minutes at a distance of about 36 cm from the lamp to bleach, or inactivate, the photochromic compound in the samples. The test squares were then kept in a dark environment for at least 1 hour prior to testing on the optical bench. The bench comprises a rail to which was fitted a 300 watt Xenon arc lamp, a remote controlled shutter, a Schott 3 mm KG-2 band-pass filter, which removed short wavelength radiation, neutral density filter(s), a quartz water cell/sample holder for maintaining sample temperature in which the test sample to be tested was inserted.

Measurements were made on the optical bench with the power output adjusted to 6.7 Watts per square meter. Measurement of the power output was made using an International Light Research Radiometer (Model #: IL1700; Serial #: 1290) with a radiometer detector (Model #: SED 033; Serial #: 5886) or comparable equipment. The radiometer was placed in an optical rail carrier on the rail at the correct focal length and the light output was measured. Adjustments to the power output were made by increasing or decreasing the lamp wattage or by adding or removing neutral density filters in the light path.

The test samples were exposed to UV irradiation using a Xenon arc lamp at 30° normal to the surface of the test sample. A monitoring, collimated beam of light from the tungsten/halogen lamp maintained perpendicular to the test sample was passed through it and then directly into an integrating sphere attached to a spectrophotometer. The integrating sphere is a device to collect and mix all of monitoring light that passes through the test sample. The control of the test conditions and acquisition of the data was handled by a proprietary program in conjunction with OOIBased 32 software provided by Ocean Optics, Inc.

Change in optical density (ΔOD) from the bleached state to the darkened state was determined by establishing the initial transmittance, opening the shutter from the Xenon lamp to provide ultraviolet radiation to change the test lens from the bleached state to an activated (i.e., darkened) state at selected intervals of time, measuring the transmittance in the activated state, and calculating the change in optical density according to the formula: ΔOD=log(% Tb/% Ta), where % Tb is the percent transmittance in the bleached state, % Ta is the percent transmittance in the activated state and the logarithm is to the base 10.

The Bleach Rate (T ½) is the time interval in seconds for the ΔOD of the activated form of the photochromic compound in the lenses to reach one half the highest ΔOD after removal of the source of activating light, i.e., shutter closed.

Results for the photochromic imbibed lenses of: Examples 1–10 and Comparative Examples 1 and 2 are listed in Table 1; of Examples 11 and 12 and Comparative Examples 1 and 2 using dual imbibition steps are listed in Tables 2 and 3; Examples 12–17 and Comparative Examples 1 and 2 to which a commercial hardcoat or a hardcoat and antireflection coatings were applied and also tested for adhesion on single lenses after being held in boiling water for 1 hour using ASTM D-3359 Standard Test Method for Measuring Adhesion by Tape Test-Method B are listed in Tables 4 and 5; Examples 15, 17 and 18, which includes a mixtures of an epoxy-containing compound and an organic polyol in Example 18, in Table 6; and Example 19 to 24 and Comparative Examples 3–6, which utilize poly(urea-urethane) lenses, in Table 7. An abbreviation identifying the kinetic enhancing additive (KEA) used in the examples is included with the Example No. in each Table.

The results of Examples 1–3 and 11–14 should be compared to Comparative Example 1, Examples 4–10 and 15–18 should be compared to Comparative Example 2, Example 19 should be compared to Comparative Example 3, Example 20 should be compared to Comparative Example 4, Examples 21 and 22 should be compared to Comparative Example 5, and Examples 23 and 24 should be compared to Comparative Example 6.

It is important that the substrate of the Comparative Example is from the same batch of material used to produce the substrate of the Examples. This is done to avoid the effects of any variation in the batches on the outcome of the Photochromic Performance Test.

Also included in the Tables is a Performance Rating resulting from the Photochromic Performance Test. The Photochromic Performance Test utilizes the ΔOD at 15 minutes and Bleach Rate results to determine a rating of the photochromic performance. The Performance Rating is calculated by dividing the ΔOD at 15 minutes by the T ½ and multiplying the result by 10,000. The higher the Performance Rating, the more kinetically enhanced the photochromic compounds are as compared to the Comparative Examples without the additive of the present invention.

TABLE 1

Example No.

Imbibition

ΔOD @ 15

T ½

Performance

(KEA)

Time (hrs.)

minutes

seconds

Rating

1 (TMPTGE)

7

0.64

112

57.1

2 (PEG(DGE))

7

0.42

102

41.2

8

0.56

120

46.7

3 (PCLD)

8

0.57

121

47.1

CE 1

8

0.59

177

33.3

4 (TMPTGE)

7

0.48

73

65.8

5 (PEG(DGE))

7

0.37

67

55.2

8

0.45

81

55.6

6 (PCLD)

8

0.43

87

49.4

7 (PEG-600)

8

0.45

95

47.4

8 (PTHF)

8

0.45

90

50.0

9 (PEG-900)

8

0.44

81

54.3

10 (HD)

8

0.55

132

41.7

CE 2

8

0.55

141

39.0

TABLE 2

Time for

Time for

First Imbibition

Imbibition @

Second Imbibition

Imbibition @

ΔOD @ 15

T ½

Example No.

135° C.

Example No.

135° C.

minutes

seconds

Performance Rating

11 (TMPTGE)

3 hours

CE 1

7 hours

0.59

158

37.3

11 (TMPTGE)

3 hours

12 (TMPTGE)

7 hours

0.57

126

45.2

—

—

CE 1

7 hours

0.58

196

29.6

—

—

12 (TMPTGE)

7 hours

0.60

147

40.8

TABLE 3

Time for

Time for

First Imbibition

Imbibition @

Second Imbibition

Imbibition @

ΔOD @ 15

T ½

Example No.

135° C.

Example No.

135° C.

minutes

seconds

Performance Rating

CE 1

8 hours

—

—

0.55

193

28.5

CE 1

8 hours

12 (TMPTGE)

1 hour

0.49

95

47.4

CE 1

8 hours

12 (TMPTGE)

2 hours

0.48

98

48.9

CE 1

8 hours

12 (TMPTGE)

3 hours

0.48

99

48.5

CE 2

8 hours

—

—

0.50

149

33.6

CE 2

8 hours

15 (TMPTGE)

1 hour

0.44

74

59.5

CE 2

8 hours

15 (TMPTGE)

2 hours

0.43

74

58.1

CE 2

8 hours

15 (TMPTGE)

3 hours

0.42

75

56.0

TABLE 4

ΔOD @

15

T ½

Performance

% Loss of

Example No.

Treatment

minutes

seconds

Rating

Coating

12 (TMPTGE)

None

0.59

135

43.7

N/A

HC

0.56

140

40.0

0

HC & AR

0.59

135

43.7

5–15%

13 (PEG900)

None

0.40

79

50.6

N/A

HC

0.39

89

43.8

<5%

HC & AR

0.54

126

42.9

15–35%

14 (PCLD)

None

0.56

119

47.1

N/A

HC

0.52

132

39.4

0

HC & AR

0.55

121

45.5

<5%

CE 1

None

0.59

173

34.1

N/A

HC

0.56

190

29.5

0

HC & AR

0.60

178

33.7

<5%

TABLE 5

ΔOD @

15

T ½

Performance

% Loss of

Example No.

Treatment

minutes

seconds

Rating

Coating

15 (TMPTGE)

None

0.48

92

52.2

N/A

HC

0.46

95

48.4

0

HC & AR

0.48

87

55.2

<5%

16 (PEG900)

None

0.40

82

48.8

N/A

HC

0.39

88

44.3

<5%

HC & AR

0.40

80

50.0

5–35%

17 (PCLD)

None

0.44

80

55.0

N/A

HC

0.42

91

46.2

0

HC & AR

0.44

79

55.7

0

CE 2

None

0.52

137

38.0

N/A

HC

0.50

141

35.5

0

HC & AR

0.53

136

39.0

<5%

TABLE 6

Imbibition

Time

ΔOD @

T ½

Performance

Example No.

(hours)

15 minutes

seconds

Rating

15 (TMPTGE)

4

0.55

141

39.0

8

0.56

200

28.0

17 (PCLD)

4

0.53

139

38.1

8

0.58

143

40.6

18 (TMPTGE &

4

0.54

128

42.2

PCLD)

8

0.59

148

39.9

CE 2

4

0.48

207

23.2

8

0.53

226

23.5

TABLE 7

ΔOD @ 30

ΔOD @ 15

T ½

Performance

Example No.

seconds

minutes

seconds

Rating

19 (PEG(DGE))

0.15

0.46

162

28.4

CE 3

0.03

0.26

1032

2.5

20 (PEG(DGE))

0.12

0.40

206

19.4

CE 4

0.03

0.22

1496

1.5

21 (PCLD)

0.24

0.61

121

50.4

22 (PEG-900)

0.13

0.41

221

18.6

CE 5

0.07

0.43

804

5.3

23 (PCLD)

0.20

0.55

147

37.4

24 (PEG-900)

0.08

0.28

312

9.0

CE 6

0.05

0.33

>904

<3.7

The results of Table 1 show that the photochromic lenses prepared using the solutions of Examples 1–3 and 4–10 faded faster than the photochromic lenses prepared using the solutions of Comparative Examples 1 and 2, respectively. The Performance Rating for each of the Example treated lenses was higher than that of the lenses treated with the Comparative Examples. Also, when the imbibition time was extended from 7 to 8 hours for lenses treated with the solutions of Examples 2 and 5, the performance rating increased.

The results of Table 2 show that the kinetic enhancing additive could be imbibed separately (Example 11) in a 3 hour first step followed by a second imbibition of photochromic compounds (CE 1) or a combination of kinetic enhancing additive and photochromic compounds (Example 12) and result in a higher performance rating than if only photochromic compounds are imbibed (CE 1). Imbibition of kinetic enhancing additives in both steps resulted in a higher Performance Rating, 45.2, than when imbibed in either the first step, 37.3, or the second step, 40.8.

The results of Table 3 show that when the kinetic enhancing additive is used in a second imbibition step of from 1 to 3 hours an improvement in the Performance Rating over a single imbibition step without kinetic enhancing additives is obtained.

Tables 4 and 5 demonstrate the effects of subsequent coatings applied to the lenses that have been imbibed with 2 different photochromic formulations, respectively, and 3 different kinetic enhancing additives. The imbibed lenses were coated only with HI-GARD®1030 solution or HI-GARD 1030® solution and an antireflective coating by Reflection Free, a divison of Essilor of America, with the commercially available antireflective (AR) coating sold as Relection Free® Plus. This coating is a vacuum deposited AR coating. In each case a lens having no treatment was used for comparison. The thickness of the cured hardcoat (HC) was about 2 microns.

In Table 4, the Performance Rating decreased somewhat with the additional coatings except for the HC & AR coated lenses imbibed with Example 12. The percent loss of coating of the lenses imbibed with Example 14 was unexpectedly equivalent to Comparative Example 1. The percent loss of coating for the lenses imbibed with Example 12 was less than that of those imbibed with Example 13.

In Table 5, the Performance Rating for the lenses imbibed with a different photochromic formulation than those in Table 4, showed a decrease for the hardcoated lenses and an increase for the hardcoated and antireflection coated lenses. The percent loss of coating for the lenses imbibed with Example 17 was unexpectedly better than those imbibed with Comparative Example 2. The percent loss results for lenses imbibed with Example 15 were equivalent to the lenses imbibed with Comparative Example 2 and the results of lenses imbibed with Example 16 were somewhat worse than Comparative Example 2.

Table 6 shows the effect of combining an epoxy-containing kinetic enhancing additive (TMPTGE) with an organic polyol (PCLD) in Example 18 as compared to the individual KEA's or CE2 with no KEA, each imbibed 4 or 8 hours. The Performance Rating for Example 15 decreased when the time for imbibition was extended from 4 to 8 hours whereas there was an increase in the 8 hour Performance Rating as compared to the 4 hour Performance Rating of Example 17. The 4 hour Performance Rating for the combination of KEA's in Example 18 (5% TMPTGE and 5% PCLD) unexpectedly demonstrated synergy by having a higher Performance Rating, i.e., 42.2, than either of the individual components tested at an equivalent concentration, i.e., Example 15 (10% TMPTGE) having a Performance Rating of 39.0 and Example 17 (10% PCLD) having a Performance Rating of 38.1. The 8 hour Performance Rating results for Example 18 did not demonstrate synergy. Each of Example 15, 17 and 18 had a higher Performance Rating that CE-2 without KEA.

The results of Table 7 show that all of the photochromic lenses that were prepared using photochromic imbibition solutions of the present invention in Examples 19–24, got darker after 30 seconds and 15 minutes and faded faster than the photochromic lenses prepared using Comparative Examples 3–6 in the Photochromic Performance Test. The Performance Rating for each of the Example lenses was higher than that of the Comparative Examples.

The present invention has been described with reference to specific details of particular embodiments thereof. It is not intended that such details be regarded as limitations upon the scope of the invention except insofar as to the extent that they are included in the accompanying claims.