Reader Comments and Retorts

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Part of me likes the idea of Martinez with Hanley returning to play first base but if the shoulder is acting up again that gets troublesome quickly.

JD Martinez hasn't played 1B since getting into a couple of games there in rookie ball and the NY-Penn league back in 2009, but is there any reason to think he couldn't make the transition? I like his bat a lot more than Hosmer's.

JD Martinez hasn't played 1B since getting into a couple of games there in rookie ball and the NY-Penn league back in 2009, but is there any reason to think he couldn't make the transition? I like his bat a lot more than Hosmer's.

That's a good question. I haven't seen enough of Martinez to even remotely have an opinion (and hell I thought Hanley would be a disaster last year so what do I know). I'd like to think if we absolutely had to put him there he could fake it but I don't know.

That's a good question. I haven't seen enough of Martinez to even remotely have an opinion (and hell I thought Hanley would be a disaster last year so what do I know). I'd like to think if we absolutely had to put him there he could fake it but I don't know.

Why not move Ramirez back to 1B (he was fine there) and just slate JD Martinez in at DH? Best way to keep him healthy, right?

Why not move Ramirez back to 1B (he was fine there) and just slate JD Martinez in at DH? Best way to keep him healthy, right?

I'd be far more concerned with keeping Martinez's bat in the lineup.

I think Jose's (justifiably) concerned about Hanley coming off shoulder surgery. I think we all agree that if Hanley is healthy he's perfectly fine at 1B and that it would make no sense to make Martinez learn a new position.

5 - There have been other factors at work but if I were running the Sox I would want Hanley playing first base next year. I think he’s a guy who needs to be involved to succeed. His attitude has always been an issue for him dating back to the minors but when he’s motivated he can be very good (check out his post-season career).

Like I said, during his Sox career there have been shoulder issues that can’t be simply dismissed for the bad years in 2015 and 2017 but at the very least I’d take away lack of involvement as a reason for failure for him.

The Red Sox should move Hanley back to the outfield. That was awesome, and ended after but one season.

But isn't the real issue with Ramirez whether the Red Sox try to finagle his playing time a bit to avoid his 2019 option vesting? That gets pretty divisive, pretty quickly, so I wouldn't recommend it, but it's not my money.

I'd be shocked at that Vaux. I actually kind of like the idea of the fireman role and trying to get 120 or so high leverage innings out of someone like Price but I will be beyond stunned if it happens.

I'd be shocked at that Vaux. I actually kind of like the idea of the fireman role and trying to get 120 or so high leverage innings out of someone like Price but I will be beyond stunned if it happens.

I agree. If he gets hurt beacuse of unfamiliar usage, the Sox get stuck with a huge contract.

Also, I don't think you can justify paying $30M for 120 IP. There just aren't that many high leverage innings that Kimbrel doesn't already have covered.

I think this is the team they go to war with. Their back is against the salary cap for the next two years. After next year the only significant salary coming the books is Kimbrel (and maybe Ramirez, but I doubt it) but that cash will be absorbed by late arb guys, then after 2019 we lose Hanley, Sandoval, Sale and Porcello, freeing up some real money.

Also, none of this crop of free agents is exciting. The upgrade from any free agent is not worth the $$ or frankly the risk of trading away JBJ (for example) so we can sign FreeAgentDude, and watch Jackie turn into Travis Shaw rev2 while FAD is perfectly executing the first-year-free-agent-Fenway-swoon.

Last year we succeeded despite a weird total downturn of most of the starting offense, I think there is a very good chance for a significant rebound next year, which would make this team as constructed, pretty dangerous. I vote for tinkering at the edges, sign Nunez and Fister types for low money and ride the the #### out of this train.

I'm with the Fish generally. I think another bat is ideal (and I'll be surprised if they don't get one) and I agree that Fister/Nunez or reasonable facsimiles are needed.

I think the point about the downturn is significant. I think the Sox as of this moment are a much better team next year than they were this year simply by plexiglass principle. Moves will be made around the league and the Sox will need to do something to keep up but I think the future and the present are both still very very bright.

And to the surprise of not very many, Alex Cora is the new Sox manager. Jeez, 47th!, did not realize they burned through them quite so quickly. He got a three year deal, so if he makes it through that he'll have lasted longer than the average Red Sox manager's career.

Realizing that we don't know nothin' when it comes to managers Cora looks like a really good selection to me.

Agreed.

The plural of "anecdote" is not "data". But still...

(a) Much was said BITD about Cora's work with Pedroia when he came up. Cora recognized the position was going to be Pedroia's and focused on working with him to get him out of his initial slump rather than lobby for the position to be his own. He embodied the spirit of teamwork. I don't get the sense that they weren't operating as a team under Farrell, but worst case they're not downgrading, and best case they're upgrading, in this sense.

(b) Also BITD Cora, while in a part-time role in Boston, was cited a few times as being a future managerial candidate. Since Cora isn't white-n-gritty we can assume these comments were probably based on merit rather than conventional wisdom type of BS.

Agreed, 19, regarding our lack of expertise in managerial hirings in general, especially at a time when the tactical game is changing so fast. Still and all, Bobby Valentine was always and obviously a colossal mistake, as would have been Brad Ausmus. Also agreed that Cora seems a good choice - he was a real good Red Sox player, and he reveres Tito, who admires him back.

And agreed, 20...
(a) Cora was a great teammate when a Red Sox. That should play well with the WD&R Youth Squad, especially in that the Pedroia connection provides an alternative avenue of communication between manager and team.
(b) at the time, adjusting for the embedded racism, I thought "future managerial candidate" in regard to Cora was code for "sure, he's not white, but he's still really smart." So yeah, merit-based.

Farrell getting canned is part of the price (no pun intended) we always knew we were going to have to pay when they hired Dombrowski; I don't see how JF failed at piloting the virgin "run-prevention" scheme unless DD was expecting him to hit more home runs. But if you're bringing in a new broom anyway, choosing a young guy like Cora, who was a very happy player with the Sox, to replace the rather stern and much older Farrell, helps to sweep clean.

If the Sox want to be the first contemporary team to invent a 120-inning reliever, I'm all for it, but I don't want it to be Price.

The contemporary 120 inning reliever is a guy who also is a spot starter. He only started that many because of injuries, but he probably still would have passed 100 without the starts (he was at 36.2 IP in relief before his first start in the beginning of June; majority of his relief appearances were 2 innings or longer).

Of course, if DD can manage to straight-up trade Price for Rizzo, that could reshuffle the boot.

The news about Pedroia is disappointing because I love the guy so freakin' much. It doesn't really change what the Sox should be doing too much. As I noted in the initial post the Sox were going to need some sort of infield caddy whether it's Nunez or someone similar. I don't think that type of player should be difficult to find.

Pedroia has surgery, out 7 months per Pete Abe, which would apparently mean missing about the first 50 games of 2018.

Reportedly a cartilage restoration procedure. Seems a bit murky about what is involved and the degree of effectiveness. Apparently, it depends. Boston will miss Pedroia on the field, but it's tough to play a leadership role when not playing or playing poorly, so there may be a void there, too.

#27. I thought Butterfield was quite well respected around the place. That seems a surprise. I suppose the team didn't really hit all that well this year, I can see them removing Davis for that.
The lack of power, in that stadium with the juiced ball, did seem a bit odd this year.

To me, the interesting thing is not so much that Cora gets to pick his own staff(*), but that the entire coaching staff got vacuumed up by Theo Epstein's and Terry Francona's teams right away. I'm trying to get better about letting go of that, but that these playoff teams headed (one way or another) by guys I still trust a bit more than what I've got wanted them makes me worry.

(*) As much as Cora probably gets most of his own guys, I'd kind of be shocked if Brian Bannister isn't the new pitching coach. He certainly seems to be the front office's guy, to the point of putting him in uniform even though I think most of his work was still behind-the-scenes.

That's a good call about Bannister. From what I've read Gedman is the leading candidate to be the hitting coach. Bullpen coach Dana Levangie is another name I've seen bandied about as possibly being pitching coach.

Happy to have Cora. Fan-boy hopes for new coaches: Mike Lowell? Bench coach? Is Varitek maybe ready to come out of his cave?

Sad to see Willis and Butterfield go, but like Jose says, that's just the new broom sweeping clean. (Plus, neither of them hit any home runs, either.)

Running the '18 version of the Sox is not going to be a low-stress job for anybody involved. Interesting that Girardi is out as well; rookie pilots in both spots, maybe - I wonder if Showalter's licking his chops?

If it's Stanton coming our way, with, say, Prado too, and Boston assumes all the money; would JBJr (and stuff - Chavis?) to the Marlins be appealing? From there you could sit pretty well tight going into 2018. 1B and backups and stuff.

The Sox are talking to the agents' of Carlos Santana and Logan Morrison: http://www.espn.com/blog/mlb/rumors/post/_/id/37531/rumor-central-carlos-santana-logan-morrison-on-red-soxs-radar. Neither would be a shocking addition.

LoMo strikes me as a guy who would be a good pickup. I assume he won’t be outrageous money and it wouldn’t shock me if he was 85% of Hosmer at much less of the cost in years and money. He’s far from a sure thing though.

Santana makes a world of sense though. I’d be thrilled if the Sox landed him.