The Tsilhqot’in Nation today called on the federal government to distance itself from the offensive remarks and warnings of violence by Williams Lake Chamber of Commerce president Walter Cobb - the latest in a growing number of verbal attacks coming from some prominent supporters of the proposed Prosperity Mine.

“How the federal government rules on the fate of Teztan Biny (Fish Lake) will reveal a lot about its true character, the positions it agrees with, and its respect for the law, the environment and its constitutional duties to First Nations,” said Tribal Chair Chief Joe Alphonse of Tl’etinqox-T’in.

Describing the choice for the federal government, Marilyn Baptiste, Chief of the Tsilhqot’in People of Xeni said: “We have the CEAA review panel report’s damning findings about this project, the precedents for rejecting projects based on such reports, the negative findings over 15 years from DFO, the support of First Nations, environmental groups, rights groups and individuals from across Canada, many concerned citizens in Williams Lake, and even the BC government’s own previous rulings on the need to protect this environment and First Nations rights from destructive projects.

“On the other hand we have an alliance between the BC government and Taseko that seeks to turn these beautiful precious lands and waters into a 35 sq km wasteland, because with current technology the company says the only way to make a profit from the low grade ore is to destroy everything. Apparently its arguments are so poor that it must result to having mine supporters like Mr. Cobb and Junior Mines Minister Randy Hawes trying to champion the mine by making derogatory – even racist – comments about First Nations and issuing statements that some extremists might see as condoning violence against us,” said Chief Percy Guichon of the Tsilhqot’in People of Tsi Deldel.

The TNG has stated it is ready to defend its lands against the company should an unjust ruling be made, but its position would be aimed at preventing Taseko Mines and the BC government from proceeding with work – especially while major court cases regarding First Nations rights are still before the courts. Taking action against the people of Williams Lake has never been a consideration.

“On the other hand, prominent mine champions Mr. Cobb and Mr. Hawes and like-minded proponents who appear to be working closely with the company, are treating this as a personal battle against First Nations and trying to incite non-aboriginal people with disgraceful insults about our people and by raising the prospect of violence against us and not condemning it,” said Chief Marilyn Baptiste.

The TNG has tried to ignore Mr. Cobb’s attacks in the past – even though he heads the Chamber of Commerce, and is a former Liberal MLA and so he has connections – because the TNG knows that he does not represent the majority view in Williams Lake. “But his latest statements, made on camera in front of the Williams Lake Chamber of Commerce and repeated again for print media, and those of some other leading campaigners for the mine, can no longer be ignored,” said Chief Joe Alphonse.

“When combined with similar comments by Junior Mines Minister Randy Hawes and others, it is clear that some of those most closely identified as working with Taseko Mines to promote this project have a derogatory view of First Nations and consider them to be an obstacle to be removed, not people with rights that need to be addressed.”

Chief Percy Guichon of the Tsilhqot’in People of Tsi Deldel said: “We believe most people realize that we oppose the mine because it would destroy pristine wilderness environment, a sacred and richly populated fishing lake, Teztan Biny (Fish Lake), and a way of life for our people who have lived here for countless generations, and not because we do not want work, as Mr. Cobb has stated, or because we do not care for our children, as Mr. Hawes has stated.

“But there may be some who see this total disregard for First Nations rights, cultures and environment based values and these comments about violence as a justification against First Nations should the mine be rejected.”

In a video-taped interview with APTN, which aired on Oct. 4, Mr. Cobb stated: “I have heard some pretty serious things that might take place if this project does not go ahead – I don’t want to even suggest that these things might happen. Do I understand where this is coming from? Yes. It is frustration.”

A few weeks earlier at a meeting with the Chamber, Junior Mines Minister Hawes made a similar statement and was quoted in a local paper as saying: “If this mine doesn’t go, there are going to be some very severe racial problems because a lot of the people, who are counting on this mine and are looking at it for hope, are going to blame the aboriginal community.”

Mr. Cobb and Mr. Hawes are not the only ones who have tried to dismiss the dire findings of serious and irreparable harm by the CEAA review panel and belittle First Nations and others who oppose this proposed mine, which the federal Department of fisheries and Oceans has warned since 1995 would be unacceptable if it killed Teztan Biny.

Earlier this summer, Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resource minister described the lake that is sacred to the Tsilhqot’in, is one of the top ten catch-and-release fishing lakes in BC, and has been featured on BC tourism brochures as “shallow,” “mucky” and a ‘pothole.” He is also on record dismissing those who fight to save the land and water as “eco-fascists.”

Premier Gordon Campbell has so far refused to distance himself from such comments. In a speech Oct, 1 to the Union of BC Municipalities, Mr. Campbell abandoned all pretence of caring about his once much vaunted New Relationship with First Nations and simply delivered the company line on this proposal and demanded Ottawa approve it.

Below: Chronology of some of the comments from Mr. Hawes, Cobb and others in promoting this mine.

1. Reported by the Canadian Press, June 16, 2010: Junior Mines Minister Randy Hawes’s response to an independent study by renowned Harvard Law School International Human Rights Clinic, which identified needed reforms to a mining system stacked against first nations in BC. “To be blunt, I think the report is hogwash,” said Mr. Hawes, questioning why Harvard doesn't look in its own backyard or concentrate elsewhere in the world where there are egregious impacts on indigenous people....While he noted that some First Nations reject mining for a more traditional lifestyle, he also said traditional ways are linked to lower birth weights, higher birth rate deaths and lower life spans.

2. Taseko Mines Ltd. President and CEO Russell Hallbauer. July 6 call with investment analysts on future of prosperity project. In response to question about First Nations rights issues and ramifications. “That’s the government’s problem.”

3. BC’s Minister of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Bill Bennett, quoted in July 8 Globe and Mail story on the Prosperity mine proposal by Justine Hunter, gives his view of Fish Lake, which is sacred to First Nations, is one BC’s top ten catch-and -release fishing areas, and was featured on BC tourism brochures. “This is a tiny little pothole of a lake...a shallow, mucky lake with too many small rainbows in it.”

4. Minister Bennett’s view of environmentalists: July 12, Globe and Mail, report by Pat Brethour: “We either stand strong together against the loss of the Flathead Valley to the eco facists [sic], or we will lose the Flathead. I am there, if you are there,” he (Bennett) writes in an e-mail sent Monday and obtained by The Globe and Mail.

5. Junior Mines Minster Hawes, at Aug. 26 meeting. 100 Mile House Free Press Aug. 31: “I don’t understand why they would put [Fish Lake] ahead of their future for their kids.” And: “As the mayor of Williams Lake said, if this mine doesn’t go, there are going to be some very severe racial problems because a lot of the people, who are counting on this mine and are looking at it for hope, are going to blame the aboriginal community.”

7. Williams Lake Mayor Kerry Cook disputes Hawes’ comments: 100 Mile House Free Press. Sept. 14: “Williams Lake council has clearly stated our support for this project and we understand there are groups and individuals who do not agree with our position. However, this is not, and should not be construed to be a racial issue.”

7. Walter Cobb: APTN Oct. 4: Evening News. On tape: “They don’t want to work…Some of those leaders seem to not want their people to work or prosper on the reserve.” And: “If this mine doesn’t go, there are going to be some very severe racial problems because a lot of the people, who are counting on this mine and are looking at it for hope, are going to blame the aboriginal community.”

Walter Cobb: Vancouver Province Oct. 5: Cobb said he stands by similar remarks he made to the Aboriginal Peoples’ Television Network on Monday. “That’s exactly what I meant,” Cobb told The Province Tuesday....Cobb said that in his view, First Nations “want the resources, they want the welfare, but they don’t want to have to pay for them.”

Williams Lake, BC. Thursday, October 21: Assembly of First Nations National Chief Shawn Atleo joined the chiefs of the six Tsilhqot’in First Nations in Williams Lake this week to reaffirm country-wide support for their battle to save Teztan Biny (Fish Lake) and to get an update on developments.

“We are grateful to National Chief Atleo and chiefs across BC and Canada who are united in supporting us in our determined efforts to ensure that the federal government lives up to its constitutional duty to protect our rights and its duties to protect the environment and rejects this mine,” said TNG Tribal Chair Chief Joe Alphonse.

National Chief Atleo said: “This project is a bad proposal and a textbook example of how not to pursue mining. First Nations are not opposed to development that is environmentally responsible and respectful of their rights. The current proposal is unacceptable and must be rejected. First Nations, governments and industry must work together on the basis of respect to develop mining proposals that work for everyone,” said National Chief Atleo.

Xeni Gwet’in Chief Marilyn Baptiste of the Tsilhqot’in National Government said: “The support of Chief Atleo and the AFN is vital to us and we appreciate the opportunity to have this meeting.

“There have been many new revelations and developments since the July 2 Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency review panel report found there would be significant and irreparable hard to both our environment and our rights, culture and future,” said Chief Baptiste. “All of them have reinforced our position that the government is constitutionally, legally and morally bound to reject this specific proposal.”

Examples of new information include:

· Access to information documents which show the federal Department of Fisheries warned repeatedly from 1995 onwards that the federal government could not approved a mine that killed Fish Lake, and urged the company and province not to waste time on this idea. DFO continued to oppose the mine during the CEAA hearings, stating that even when using the “no net loss” rules for fisheries, the proposal fails to meet the required standards for approval.

· The provincial government recently confirmed that when the proposed mine, with its 35 sq. km footprint, was still in the design phase, it rejected a small resort lodge expansion in the same area on the grounds that it would be too damaging to the environment and First Nations rights. There was no explanation for abandoning these principles, other than to say more money was involved with the proposed mine.

· The proponent company and people associated with it directed almost $500,000 in donations to BC Liberal party coffers as the BC Liberal government prepared to move towards an EA process.

· The province appears to have accepted the proponent company’s claims of jobs and economic benefits without seeking independent verification. It has refused to consider studies by other experts which indicate the mine will generate only a fraction of the promised revenues and jobs, and that when subsidized hydro and other costs are factored in, the mine could actually cost British Columbians at least $20 million a year over the life of the mine.

· The company has repeatedly portrayed First Nations as an obstacle against jobs and some of those championing the mine – including BC’s Junior Mines Minister Randy Hawes and Williams Lake Chamber of Commerce president and former Liberal MLA Walter Cobb – have resorted to making offensive comments about First Nations culture and have warned that there will be angry repercussions against our people if the mine does not go ahead

· Despite claims of massive support for this mine, the only effort to demonstrate this was the recent release of a three-month old poll, which surveyed a total of 200 people in Williams Lake and 100 Mile House, where the mining company has been most active in promising jobs and economic activity. It ignored the population of the entire region that would be affected. It was conducted by a small boutique company that boasts on its website: “We know what questions to ask, but more importantly, we know how to analyze the results to help our clients win.” Yet despite all these efforts to guarantee resounding support for the mine, the poll still found that one third of respondents were opposed to the mine and 55% were concerned about the negative environmental impacts.

· Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources Minister Bill Bennett demonstrated how much attention his government had paid to assessing the environmental value of Fish Lake by declaring that this pristine body of water, which is teeming with wild rainbow trout, is one of the top ten catch-and- release fishing lakes in BC and was featured on Tourism BC brochures, was just a “pothole.”

“These and other revelations demonstrate on the one hand the justification for rejecting this specific mine proposal, and on the other hand the weakness of the provincial review process, the paucity of the arguments for the mine, and the depths to which some people have been willing to go to try to generate public support for the mine and incite anger against First Nations,” said Chief Baptiste.

RE: Open Letter regarding UBCIC’s Support for Tsilhqot’in Nation and Call for the Federal Rejection of the Proposed Prosperity Mine

Dear Honourable Ministers and Premier Campbell

We are writing to you with respect to UBCIC Resolution no. 2010-32, Support for Tsilhqot’in Nation and Call for Federal Rejection of the Proposed Prosperity Mine that was carried at the Union of BC Indian Chiefs Annual General Assembly on September 16, 2010 (enclosed).

We are writing again, to strongly emphasize UBCIC’s position of support for the Tsilhqot’in Nation’s rejection of Taseko Mine Ltd’s proposed Prosperity Mine. We fully support the efforts of the Tsilhqot’in to protect their lands which hold profound cultural and spiritual value and will stand behind them in full defense of these lands. We call on you and your governments to heed the cautions of the independent panel and we urge you to demonstrate your commitment to environmental protection and the cultural survival of First Nations and to reject the proposed Prosperity Mine. Again, we would like to reiterate that the federal government must reject the proposed Prosperity Mine and review DFO’s “no net loss policy” which allows lakes to be reclassified as tailings ponds to support mining development. The independent panel concluded that this project would result in “significant adverse environmental effects” on fish habitat, grizzly bears, navigation and First Nations traditional land use, cultural heritage and on Aboriginal Title and Rights.

Further to UBCIC’s most recent resolution regarding this issue, we are advising you of the close surveillance that First Nations across Canada are paying to this particular issue. We caution the federal government that if approval is made for the proposed Prosperity Mine, despite clear warnings from the independent panel, this would demonstrate complete disregard for the survival of First Nations as distinctive cultures within Canada.

Please contact us for any further information. You can reach the UBCIC office at 604-684-0231.

On behalf of the UNION OF BC INDIAN CHIEFS

[Original signed]

Grand Chief Stewart PhillipPresident

Chief William CharlieVice-President

Chief Bob ChamberlinSecretary-Treasurer

cc:Honourable George Abbott, Minister of Aboriginal Relations and ReconciliationThe First Nations SummitThe BC Assembly of First NationsTsilhqot’in National Government - - -

With a federal decision pending on the future of Fish Lake in British Columbia, the Assembly of First Nations is calling for continued dialogue with first nation leaders in the region.

We continue to stand proudly behind the Tsilhqot'in government as they defend their traditional territories and ways of life, despite suggestions from local politicians that the Taseko Mines Ltd. project near Williams Lake should be a "no-brainer" for the six communities it will directly impact.

To suggest that first nations in the region should welcome a mining project based solely on its potential for economic growth would mean abandoning a host of rights and responsibilities.

First nations have a responsibility to the land and with that hold constitutionally protected rights. As stewards of the land, as mothers, grandmothers, uncles and aunties, the Tsilhqot'in exercise their responsibility to provide for future generations in an environmentally sustainable way.

An independent panel of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency concluded the mining project would permanently destroy lands and waters at Fish Lake. The panel reported that the mine would negatively impact fish habitat, local wildlife, navigation and traditional land use, devastating the surrounding environment and permanently threaten the rich heritage of the territories of the Tsilhqot'in Nation.

Let's be clear -- first nations are not opposed to economic development and see the benefits in terms of growth and job creation in communities, but it's got to be done in an environmentally balanced way -- and in a way that's right for everyone involved. This means discussions and dialogue with local first nations to ensure their rights, citizens and future generations are protected.

The citizens of the Tsilhqot'in nations are standing up, as leaders in their communities, and in a way that could be considered an example for similar scenarios taking place across Canada where the duty to consult with first nations has not been fulfilled.

In the absence of government discussion with the Tsilhqot'in government, the Assembly of First Nations is strongly encouraging the federal government to engage the local communities in adequate consultation before a decision is made, particularly when first nations have repeatedly expressed their willingness to be part of the discussion.

An effective dialogue could spark a strengthened relationship required to continue our work together as governments and nations.

With the decision on the Taseko Mines project at Fish Lake, Ottawa has an opportunity to demonstrate a commitment to environmental protection and a renewed relationship with first nations.

Shawn A-in-chut Atleo, National Chief of the Assembly of First Nations- - -

Carole James, leader of B.C.'s Official Opposition and MLA for Victoria-Beacon Hill.

October 21, 2010

As leader of the Official Opposition, I've spent much of the past year talking to people from all sectors and regions about how to create good jobs, raise the revenues needed for health and education and transition B.C.'s economy to become more dynamic, sustainable and diversified.

Two of the central messages I have heard back are that sound economic decision making must focus on the future as well as the present and that the impact on community health and the environment must be key considerations. The pending decision by the federal cabinet on whether or not to approve the proposed Taseko Prosperity Mine project near Williams Lake brings these issues to the forefront.

In July, the Federal Review Panel found that the proposed project would have significant adverse environmental effects, including the destruction of Fish Lake which is home to 90,000 rainbow trout. The independent panel also found it would have significant adverse effects to the Tsilhqot'in First Nations for whom Teztan Biny (Fish Lake) has cultural significance and has been fished for generations.

The Tsilhqot'in First Nations, with support from the Assembly of First Nations and the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs, are opposing the proposed mine. At the same time, they have made it clear this does not mean they are opposed to economic development. But, as Shawn Atleo, national chief of the AFN wrote recently, it must be done in an environmentally balanced way and involve real dialogue with local First Nations.

In contrast, the BC Liberals have deliberately ignored legitimate environmental and First Nations concerns sowing seeds of division and economic uncertainty. For example, Randy Hawes, junior mines minister, dismissed the Tsilhqot'in's legitimate concerns over Fish Lake, saying "I don't happen to agree that this is a very important lake."

Uncertainty hurts our economy

B.C.'s economic growth cannot be built on a foundation of conflict and division. It creates uncertainty for investors, industry, people and communities, and undermines the possibility for long-term economic planning and job growth.

This is not a new concept. Treaty tables were created in the 1990s with First Nations communities in respect of government's duty to respect constitutional rights and aboriginal desires to share the benefits of economic activity. During the same period, environmental consideration was strengthened and given legitimacy with greater independence from government through the creation of entities such as the Environmental Assessment Office and the Oil and Gas Commission.

We need to build on these examples and find better ways to promote economic activity like mining, which creates jobs and contributes to provincial revenues. One solution is the creation of a mining commission to work with mining companies, First Nations and local communities to find places where mining makes sense. It would create dialogue, mutual benefit and certainty.

Establish a mining commission

Over the coming months, the BC New Democrat opposition will consult with First Nations, the mining sector and communities and when the legislature resumes sitting in the new year, will introduce a private member's bill to establish a mining Commission so future projects, companies, communities and First Nations do not go through what those involved in this proposed project have.

And, before the federal cabinet acts, it should heed the advice of its own review panel and ensure local issues are addressed in the interest of aboriginal title, environmental protection and economic development.

RE: Open Letter regarding Okanagan Nation's Support for Tsilhqot'in Nation and Call for the Federal Rejection of the Proposed Prosperity Mine

Dear Honourable Ministers, Premier Campbell and Cabinet:

We are writing to you with respect to Okanagan Nation Alliance (ONA) Resolution No. 213 which expresses support for Tsilhqot'in Nation and calls for Federal Cabinet rejection of the Proposed Prosperity Mine. This resolution was endorsed unanimously at the ONA Chief and Councils Quarterly Meeting on October 21, 2010.

We are writing to reiterate once again the Okanagan Nation takes this opportunity to express our strong unwavering support for the Tsilhqot'in Nation's rejection of Taseko Mine Ltd's proposed Prosperity Mine. We fully and completely support the resolute determination and absolute right of the Tsilhqot'in to protect their lands which hold profound cultural and spiritual value. We shall not stand idly by and silently witness the obliteration and destruction Teztan Biny (Fish Lake). The Okanagan Nation member Chiefs and Councils will stand in complete solidarity with the Tsilhqot'in and Northern Shuswap peoples in the defense of their homelands.

We call on you and your governments to heed the cautions of the independent environmental review panel. Further, we urge you to demonstrate your commitment to environmental protection. More importantly we advise you to uphold your fiduciary and jurisdictional responsibilities to safeguard the cultural integrity and survival of Indigenous peoples, as expressed both by the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and as expressed in the Canadian Constitution of 1982. As representatives of Canada you must reject the proposed Prosperity Mine that will result in the complete eradication and destruction of the Teztan Biny (Fish Lake).

Additionally, we want to advise you that this action is being closely monitored by all Indigenous peoples in Canada as well as Internationally. There is only one acceptable and reasonable resolution, and that is the rejection of this environmental destructive proposal to establish the Taseko Mine Ltd's proposed Prosperity Mine.

Please contact the Okanagan Nation Alliance Executive Director, Pauline Terbasket for any further information at 250.707.0095 or email: director@syilx.org.

Sincerely,

OKANAGAN NATION ALLIANCE

Grand Chief Stewart PhillipChairman

cc:Tsilhqot'in National GovernmentOkanagan Nation Chief's and Council MembersHonourable George Abbott, Minister of Aboriginal Relations and ReconciliationThe First Nations Summit Political CouncilUnion of B.C. Indian Chiefs, Chiefs CouncilThe BC Assembly of First Nations Regional Chief

TRIBAL COUNCIL RESOLUTION

2010-2011 No. 213

SUPPORT FOR TSILHQOT'IN NATION AND CALL FOR FEDERAL REJECTION OF THE PROPOSED PROSPERITY MINE

October 21st, 2010

WHEREAS: The Okanagan Nation has un-extinguished Aboriginal title, jurisdiction and rights to all Syilx territory; and,

WHEREAS: As a unified Okanagan Nation, we continue to affirm our mandate to advocate, practice and preserve the culture, language, natural resources and title and rights of the Syilx Peoples; and,

WHEREAS: The Okanagan Nation and member Bands recognizes the un-extinguished Aboriginal title, jurisdiction and rights of the Tsilhqot'in people; and,

WHEREAS: The Okanagan Nation opposes the proposed Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine (the "Project") because it requires the complete destruction of Teztan Biny (Fish Lake), a traditional

fishery and ceremonial site that has sustained the Tsilhqot'in people for generations, in an area where the Tsilhqot'in people hold proven Aboriginal hunting and trapping rights; and,

WHEREAS: The Okanagan Nation Alliance Chief's and Council members are participating members of the Union of BC Indian Chief (UBCIC) supports UBCIC Resolution No. 2010-03 and Resolution No. 2010-32, recognizing the Tsilhqot'in Nation's opposition to the Project; and,

WHEREAS: The forenamed Resolutions supports all Indigenous people who take Action to defend and protect the sacred waters and health of their Territories; and,

WHEREAS: Entire communities of the Tsilhqot'in people attended the public hearings held by the federal panel (the "Panel") conducting the environmental assessment of the Project, and

Tsilhqot'in members from as young as 7 to as old as 90 explained the cultural and spiritual

Importance of these lands and waters to the Panel; and,

WHEREAS: The Independent Panel concluded that "the Project" would result in significant adverse environmental effects on fish and fish habitat, on navigation, on the current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes by First Nations and on cultural heritage, and on certain potential or established Aboriginal Title or Rights and on threatened grizzly bear populations; and,

WHEREAS: The Panel specifically concluded that the mine would permanently destroy lands and waters described as an "important cultural and spiritual area" for the Tsilhqot'in people, "an important teaching environment for Tsilhqot'in youth;" an important source of fish for their "sustenance" and "a place of spiritual power and healing for the Tsilhqot'in"; and,

WHEREAS: The Panel further warned that "the loss of the Teztan Biny (Fish Lake) and Nabas areas for current use activities, ceremonies, teaching, and cultural and spiritual practices would be irreversible, of high magnitude and have a long-term effect on the Tsilhqot'in" and these "impacts on the physical and mental health of the Tsilhqot'in communities would be long term"; and,

WHEREAS: Although the Panel provided recommendations to the Government should the Project proceed, it explicitly cautioned that "it does not believe that these recommendations would eliminate or accommodate the significant loss First Nations would experience.;" and,

WHEREAS: The decision to approve or reject the Project is now in the hands of Federal Cabinet, and there is heavy lobbying by the Government of British Columbia, the mining industry and others for the approval of the Project notwithstanding that these are the most dire warnings of environmental and cultural damage that a federal Panel has ever issued; and,

WHEREAS: The Okanagan Nation has consistently voiced strong and unwavering support for the Tsilhqot'in in opposition to the "Project", through attendance at the Panel, and public advocacy; and provided on-the-ground support both on Tsilhqot'in territory and through lobbying in Ottawa; and,

WHEREAS: First Nations across Canada are directed by the courts and the governments to participate in environmental assessment processes to raise concerns about development, often despite strong misgivings about whether these concerns will be properly heard or weighed in these processes, as recognized by the UBCIC Resolution No. 2010-03 and Resolution No. 2010-32; and,

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: The Okanagan Nation Alliance Chief's Executive Council fully support the efforts of the Tsilhqot'in Nation to protect their lands of profound cultural and spiritual value to its peoples from the proposed Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine, and will stand behind the Tsilhqot'in Nation in defence of these lands regardless of the decision made by the Federal Government; and,

THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: The Okanagan Nation Alliance Chief's Executive Council call upon the Federal Government to heed the cautions of its independent Panel, demonstrate commitment to environmental protection and the cultural survival of First Nations, and reject the proposed Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine; and,

THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: The Okanagan Nation Alliance Chief's Executive Council advise the Federal Government that First Nations across Canada are watching its decision to see whether there remains any value or integrity in environmental assessments for major projects, or whether First Nations must turn to litigation and other means to assert our rights and protect our cultures; and,

THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: The Okanagan Nation Chief's Executive Council caution the Federal Government that approval of the proposed Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine, despite clear warnings of its independent Panel, would demonstrate utter disregard for the survival of First Nations as distinctive cultures within Canada; and,

FURTHER BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: The Okanagan Nation Chief's Executive Council direct the Executive to advocate on behalf of the Tsilhqot'in Nation and communicate the clear support of the Okanagan Nation Chiefs Executive Council; and,

FINALLY BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED: The Okanagan Nation Chief's Executive Council directs the Executive and staff to continue working with like-minded organizations in support of the Tsilhqot'in Nation in opposition to the proposed Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine.

"the significant adverse environmental effects of the Prosperity project cannot be justified as it is currently proposed". . ."In making its decision, the Government of Canada took into consideration the conclusions of the report of the Federal Review Panel, and agreed with the Panel's conclusions about the environmental impacts of the project." - Environment Canada's rejection of Taseko's Prosperity Mine Project.

OTTAWA, Ont. -- November 2, 2010 -- The Government of Canada today announced decisions on two gold-copper mine project proposals in British Columbia. The proposal for the Mount Milligan mine, near Prince George, has been granted federal authorizations to proceed. However, the Prosperity mine project as proposed, near Williams Lake, cannot be granted federal authorizations to proceed due to concerns about the significant adverse environmental effects of the project.

"The Government has considered both projects carefully, particularly their environmental impacts," said Environment Minister, Jim Prentice. "We believe in balancing resource stewardship with economic development. The Mount Milligan project has been designed in a way that minimizes impacts to the environment, while the significant adverse environmental effects of the Prosperity project cannot be justified as it is currently proposed."

The Mount Milligan project underwent environmental assessments under provincial legislation and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA). The CEAA process involved the conduct of a comprehensive study. Both environmental assessments determined that, with the implementation of appropriate mitigation measures, the project is not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects.

The Prosperity project has also undergone a thorough review process, including an environmental assessment by the province of British Columbia and a Federal Review Panel under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. In making its decision, the Government of Canada took into consideration the conclusions of the report of the Federal Review Panel, and agreed with the Panel's conclusions about the environmental impacts of the project.

- - -The Tsilhqot'in National Government and its community members are rejoicing in today's decision by Federal Environment Minister Jim Prentice against issuing permits for the proposed Prosperity mine in central BC. This ruling will serve as a catalyst for reform and a new relationship between governments, the mining industry and First Nations.

"The federal government has honoured its Constitutional duty to protect First Nations rights and its responsibility to protect the environment. The government should be commended for recognizing that this project did not represent the best way to create jobs and economic growth," said TNG Tribal Chief Joe Alphonse.

"The Tsilhqot'in Nation understands the need for jobs in the region and believes it can work with municipalities and others to build on the environmentally friendly economic activities that are sustained by Teztan Biny (Fish Lake) and its environs and already contribute so much to the area."

Xeni Gwet'in Chief Baptiste said: "Perhaps there are other projects that can be considered. As we have always stated, we are not against resource development of any kind, just extraction at any price that leads to the destruction of our ecosystem for our future generations," "However, we hope today's decision will demonstrate the need to find a way forward for industry and governments to work with First Nations from the outset to identify and develop projects that are environmentally and culturally acceptable and sustainable." The fact that a company would spend so many years and so much money to develop and promote this Prosperity project, despite the clear and legitimate First Nations along with DFO's objections, demonstrates the need to reform BC's free-entry, on-line staking system," said Chief Baptiste.

"This proposal could not have been more guaranteed to alienate First Nations." Chief Percy Guichon said, "it in no one's interest to continue with a system that encourages the development of proposals that should never be pursued, instead of focussing on projects that have reasonable prospects. Companies waste exploration and development dollars, government waste tax dollars and First Nations are forced to use up scarce financial resources to defend against bad or unfair proposals."

"One of the main reasons there has been no major new metals mine open in BC since the mid 1990s can in large part be attributed to a system that allows anyone with a computer and a few dollars to access anywhere it wants on First Nations unceded lands and develop whatever proposal they want - no matter how environmentally unviable, and not matter how unacceptable to our people," said Chief Joe Alphonse.

Chief Joe Alphonse added: "Another reason is a provincial environmental review system that does not allow our people to fully participate and does not address the issues that we as first nations need to address. However, there are examples of companies working with other First Nations to address these concerns and to develop projects and agreements that can stand the test of time."

"Those agreements are positive examples that can be built upon. The federal government decision today will inspire efforts to reform the system in BC to the benefit of all." Source: TNG News Release- - -

TASEKO MINES RESPONDS TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S DECISION ON PROSPERITY

Once the Company has had the opportunity to fully evaluate and understand the process whereby the Federal Government came to that conclusion, contrary to the Provincial Government decision, we will be in a better position to evaluate our options.

Russell Hallbauer, President and CEO of Taseko, stated, "We are extremely disappointed by this decision, not only for our shareholders but for the communities that were relying on the development of Prosperity to help offset the economic situation in the Cariboo-Chilcotin. Our next steps will be discussions with both the Federal and Provincial Government's to look at options so that this mining project can move forward and meet the criteria that the Federal Government deem appropriate."

Russell HallbauerPresident and CEO- - -

MABC Deeply Disappointed by Federal Decision on the Prosperity MineVANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA

Nov. 2, 2010

The Mining Association of British Columbia (MABC) is very disappointed in today's decision by the federal government to reject the Prosperity gold-copper mine located near Williams Lake, owned by Vancouver-based Taseko Mines Limited.

"This is bad news for B.C.'s mining sector, and for the B.C. and Canadian economy, and especially for the central interior of BC whose hopes were tied to this project," stated Pierre Gratton, President and CEO of MABC. "The social and economic contribution of this project would have benefitted all British Columbians for at least a generation. Prosperity would be a larger economic contributor to the provincial economy than the province's film and television industry."

Major mines are rare but very valuable to the economy, and Prosperity offered much in terms of job creation, royalties and tax revenues and new opportunities for First Nations and the Williams Lake region. The balance between economic, social and environmental values led the province to approve the proposal for Prosperity.

BC's environmental assessment process is considered one of the best in Canada and is guided by sound environmental principles that ensure the responsible development of B.C.'s natural resources. The decision by the federal government that contradicts the decision by the province has not been explained in any detail. More information is needed to understand why the decision was made, and what the options are for the company to move forward.

"It will be important for the mining industry to sit down with the federal and provincial governments very soon to talk about what this decision means for the industry, for resource development in general, and for the environmental assessment process in BC," said Mr. Gratton. The mining industry has been pushing hard for the development of a single, coordinated and robust environmental assessment process to avoid exactly this kind of circumstance.

It is also disappointing that any celebratory notes in the mining industry over the approval of the Mt. Milligan project are being tempered by an overshadowing decision on Prosperity without a clear rationale.

The MABC is regarded as the predominant voice of BC's mining industry representing the collective needs and interests of operating coal, metal and industrial mineral mining companies.

AFN Welcomes Federal Decision: Encourages Sustainable Economic and Resource Development with First Nations

OTTAWA, Nov. 2, 2010

Assembly of First Nations (AFN) National Chief Shawn A-in-chut Atleo and AFN British Columbia Regional Chief Jody Wilson-Raybould welcome the federal decision to not proceed with the Prosperity Mining Project at Tetzan Biny (Fish Lake) in BC.

"I congratulate the federal government for doing the right thing here. With this decision, I encourage all parties to engage in respectful, constructive dialogue that will respect rights and maximize sustainable economic and resource development," said AFN National Chief Shawn Atleo. "We have many examples of successful partnerships between industry and First Nations that are creating jobs through sustainable projects and generating opportunity for all involved. I applaud the incredible efforts of the entire Tsilhqot'in National Government. The leadership has worked tirelessly to protect their lake, their territories and the future of their people. I was honoured to meet with them just two weeks ago in their beautiful territory and look forward to continuing to support their efforts in economic development for their communities and the region. "

"I am very pleased that Canada has respected the views of the federal Environmental Review Panel and the rights and way of life of the Tsilhqot'in people by declining to approve the Taseko Mines Ltd. application to build the Prosperity Mine. We continue to stand proudly behind the Tsilhqot'in National Government and congratulate them on their leadership," said BC Regional Chief Jody Wilson-Raybould. "Today, we must remember that First Nations are not opposed to mining or economic development and see the benefits in terms of growth and job creation in communities when it is done in a balanced way, however in this particular case the negative impacts of the mine far outweighed the potential gain. First Nations are keen to be full partners in discussions and dialogue on proposals and decisions that involve our territories. We want to ensure our rights, citizens and future generations are protected."

During a national press conference in Ottawa September 2, the AFN and First Nation leadership from across BC stood with Chief Marilyn Baptiste and other Tsilhqot'in leaders as they urged the federal government to heed the cautions of an independent panel of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. The panel reported the mine would negatively impact fish habitat, local wildlife, navigation and traditional land use, devastating the surrounding environment at Fish Lake and permanently threatening the rich heritage of the territories of the Tsilhqot'in Nation.

"We celebrate with the Tsilhqot’in people in the decision regarding Fish Lake and the plans of Taseko Mines Ltd. We honour the stand of the Tsilqot'in people for upholding their responsibilities in defending their lands and waters. We also applaud the Government of Canada for making the right decision."-Guujaaw, Council of the Haida Nation- - -

(Coast Salish Territory / Vancouver – November 3, 2010) The BC Assembly of First Nations, First Nations Summit and Union of BC Indian Chiefs are satisfied with yesterday’s decision by the Government of Canada to not grant permits for the proposed Prosperity Mine in central B.C.

BC Assembly of First Nations Regional Chief Jody Wilson-Raybould stated “I am pleased the federal government decided to protect the land and the water of the territory of the Tsilhqot’in Nation and the Northern Secwepemc. I am happy the federal government took the necessary time to review the conclusions of the report of the Federal Review Panel and accepted its findings. Today, we must remember that First Nations are not, on principle, opposed to mining or economic development but not when the negative impacts far outweigh the potential gain. As everyone knows, many Elders, youth and community members attended the public meetings of the Panel and many of them formally presented to the Panel their deep concerns about the proposed mine. Their voices were heard and their way of life protected.

“First Nations leadership across British Columbia and Canada were waiting for this decision to see if there was any value or integrity to the federal environmental assessment process for major projects,” said Grand Chief Ed John, speaking on behalf of the First Nations Summit Task Group. “Chief after chief, resolution after resolution, letter after letter, the Tsilhqot’in Nation and the Northern Secwepemc were never alone in their fight to protect the profound cultural and spiritual value of their respective territories. The Government of British Columbia should take the time to learn the lessons of Prosperity Mine and focus their efforts on immediate reform to their mining legislation and policies.”

Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, President of the Union of BC Indian Chiefs stated “This decision provides a measure of hope for Indigenous communities who support independent, full and rigorous environmental assessments to adequately assess the impacts on both the environment and our communities. Large-scale proposals like Prosperity Mine, Enbridge’s Northern Gateway and Terrane Metals' Mt. Milligan Project are projects opposed by Indigenous communities who rightly fear their way of life is at risk. For now, the Tsilhqot’in Nation and the Northern Secwepemc are successful in protecting their lake and lands. The frenzied, high-powered sales pitch of short-term economic gains must be weighed against the significant and long-lasting socio-environmental impacts such large-scale proposals will have on our grandchildren.”

- 30 -

For more information and further comment:

Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, Union of BC Indian Chiefs (250) 490-5314

Grand Chief Ed John, First Nations Summit (778) 772-8218

Courtney Daws, BC Assembly of First Nations (604) 922-7733- - -

AFN Welcomes Federal Decision: Encourages Sustainable Economic and Resource Development with First Nations

OTTAWA, Nov. 2, 2010

Assembly of First Nations (AFN) National Chief Shawn A-in-chut Atleo and AFN British Columbia Regional Chief Jody Wilson-Raybould welcome the federal decision to not proceed with the Prosperity Mining Project at Tetzan Biny (Fish Lake) in BC.

"I congratulate the federal government for doing the right thing here. With this decision, I encourage all parties to engage in respectful, constructive dialogue that will respect rights and maximize sustainable economic and resource development," said AFN National Chief Shawn Atleo. "We have many examples of successful partnerships between industry and First Nations that are creating jobs through sustainable projects and generating opportunity for all involved. I applaud the incredible efforts of the entire Tsilhqot'in National Government. The leadership has worked tirelessly to protect their lake, their territories and the future of their people. I was honoured to meet with them just two weeks ago in their beautiful territory and look forward to continuing to support their efforts in economic development for their communities and the region. "

"I am very pleased that Canada has respected the views of the federal Environmental Review Panel and the rights and way of life of the Tsilhqot'in people by declining to approve the Taseko Mines Ltd. application to build the Prosperity Mine. We continue to stand proudly behind the Tsilhqot'in National Government and congratulate them on their leadership," said BC Regional Chief Jody Wilson-Raybould. "Today, we must remember that First Nations are not opposed to mining or economic development and see the benefits in terms of growth and job creation in communities when it is done in a balanced way, however in this particular case the negative impacts of the mine far outweighed the potential gain. First Nations are keen to be full partners in discussions and dialogue on proposals and decisions that involve our territories. We want to ensure our rights, citizens and future generations are protected."

During a national press conference in Ottawa September 2, the AFN and First Nation leadership from across BC stood with Chief Marilyn Baptiste and other Tsilhqot'in leaders as they urged the federal government to heed the cautions of an independent panel of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. The panel reported the mine would negatively impact fish habitat, local wildlife, navigation and traditional land use, devastating the surrounding environment at Fish Lake and permanently threatening the rich heritage of the territories of the Tsilhqot'in Nation.- - -

Vancouver, November 2, 2010

The Tahltan Central Council applauds today’s Federal government decision to deny the environmental permit for Taseko’s Prosperity Mine project. Earlier today, the government of Canada announced that the proposed project, near Williams Lake, would not be granted federal authorizations due to concerns about the significant adverse environmental effects of the project. This project, if approved, would have destroyed Teztan Biny, also known as Fish Lake, a pristine natural habitat revered by the Tsilhqot’in First Nations.

“The Tahltan Nation has fully supported the Tsilhqot’in First Nations in their opposition to this project,” says Annita McPhee, Chair of the Tahltan Central Council, “this decision by the federal government proves that the environmental impact of the project was too great to justify the economic benefits and puts other mining companies on notice that their projects will be judged on technical merit.”

The federal government decision follows the recommendations of the federal report submitted earlier this year which stated the destruction of the current lake and 90,000 rainbow trout, and Taseko mines mitigation plan to create a new lake with 20,000 stocked fish would not meet Fisheries Canada guidelines or giver assurances to First Nations that the fish would be safe for consumption.

“This project had become a polarizing issue among First Nations across Canada,” says McPhee, “many nations were prepared to fight this project as long as necessary.” In recent months, opposition against the Prosperity Mine project grew throughout First Nations communities, and last month the Assembly of First Nations joined the chiefs of the six Tsilhqot’in First Nations to reaffirm country-wide support for the battle to save Teztan Biny.

About the Tahltan Central Council

The Tahltan Central Council exists to define and protect Tahltan inherent Aboriginal rights and title, to protect the eco-systems and natural resources of Tahltan traditional territory through pursuing sustainable economic development, and to strengthen the cultural wellness of the Tahltan Community by promoting traditional values based on the concepts of caring, sharing, cooperation, truth, honour, fairness and above all, respect.

Council of Canadians celebrates federal government decision on Fish LakeOTTAWA, Nov. 2, 2010

The Council of Canadians is celebrating the federal government decision to reject the Prosperity mine project. The Environment Canada news release states that "the Prosperity mine project as proposed, near Williams Lake, cannot be granted federal authorizations to proceed due to concerns about the significant adverse environmental effects of the project."

The Council congratulates the Tsilhqot'in whose campaign to protect the lake drew the attention of groups across the country to this very important issue.

Environment minister Jim Prentice highlighted the findings of the federal review panel in his decision. Council of Canadians water campaigner Meera Karunananthan and BC-Yukon organizer Harjap Grewal presented to this federal panel on March 22. The Williams Lake chapter also presented to the panel earlier that day. On September 7, 2010, the Council of Canadians delivered 15,000 petitions opposing the Prosperity mine project to Prentice's office on Parliament Hill.

If the project had been approved, it would have resulted in the destruction of Fish Lake, also known as Teztan Biny. Taseko had proposed using Fish Lake as a tailings impoundment area for Prosperity mine, a gold-copper mining project.

The Taseko application for the Prosperity Mine had been made under the federal Schedule 2 provision. Once added to Schedule 2, healthy freshwater lakes lose all environmental protections. There are twelve other lakes in Canada threatened by Schedule 2 including Sandy Pond. The Sandy Pond Alliance has launched a lawsuit challenging the Schedule 2 loophole.

"Schedule 2 combined with the desire of the Harper government to scrap the environmental review process present a longstanding threat to our freshwater supplies," says Council of Canadians national chairperson Maude Barlow.

"We must now ensure that other lakes across the country are protected by ensuring that the loophole in the Fisheries Act is removed and that the practice of dumping toxins into lakes is prohibited in Canada as it is in other industrialized countries," adds Barlow.

Tsilhqot’in comment on recent talk of reviving Prosperity project: Nothing has changed, the plan cannot be ‘tweaked’ to fix its massive flaws

Williams Lake, BC – January 20, 2010: Tsilhqot’in National Government today expressed its deep disappointment and concern that Taseko Mines Ltd has announced to shareholders that it intends to compound all the mistakes of the past by resubmitting its failed Prosperity project.

Tribal Chair Chief Joe Alphonse said, “We are concerned that, even though its ill-conceived proposed mine was emphatically rejected, Taseko Mines Ltd. has apparently learned nothing from wasting 17 years and $100 million of investors’ money pursuing this project despite clear warnings that neither our First Nations nor the federal government could accept it.”

Chief Alphonse said: “The Tsilhqot’in are not against development, but it must be done with respect for us as a people, with respect for the environment, and with a scientifically solid plan.

“We had hoped that the ruling to reject the Prosperity mine proposal would serve as a catalyst for reform and a new relationship between governments, the mining industry and First Nations,” said Chief Alphonse. “This continues to be our hope despite this attempt to revive this dead project and the unproductive conflict that it has generated since the beginning.”

Chief Marilyn Baptiste, Xeni Gwet’in First Nation, said: “Taseko said all the way through the process that the only way to get at the gold was to destroy Teztan Biny and the surrounding watershed. How can it be, after so many years of doggedly saying there was no other way than to drain and destroy our sacred lake, that they suddenly have a new way forward?

“To compound matters, after the project was rejected last Nov. 2, the company immediately began working with the Province and other mine supporters to revive this disastrous project without consulting our First Nations. We did receive a letter in January from the company’s president suggesting a meeting, but this was after the fact. Now we read in a company statement that it claims to have a new bid that will be acceptable – and we know nothing about it,” said Chief Baptiste.

“It is very difficult in these circumstances to believe the company is acting in good faith with us, or that it has any goal other than to force this totally unacceptable mine on us,” said Chief Baptiste.

TNG is unanimous in its position that the Prosperity Project is dead and is interested now in turning attention towards positive projects that fulfill its environmental mandate.

“The right decision was made and it would be fruitless to look at this project again. The region needs to come up with alternative ways to economically diversify and to work with First Nations to achieve this,” Chief Alphonse said.

…2/

On November 2, 2010, then federal environment minister Jim Prentice announced the plan would not be approved, citing the “scathing” finding of the CEAA review panel report, which the federal minister said was “the most condemning” he had ever seen. The report noted the loss of Fish Lake, the inadequacies of the proposed replacement lake, the immense cultural impact and the impact on grizzlies and other wildlife would all cause “significant adverse effects.” The CEAA panel and the federal department of Fisheries and Oceans also found two potential alternatives to be even worse than the rejected project.

“It makes no sense that after 17 years, the company has found in a few weeks a new idea, or for it to claim it will be acceptable when it has not even talked to us or provided a hint as to what this grand new plan is,” said Chief Baptiste.

Chief Alphonse said: “Instead of wasting time and resources trying to bring a bad project back from the dead, we once again call on the province, local municipal government and industry to work with us to create viable diversified economic plans for this area.”

Taseko Mines is breathing new life into the Prosperity Gold-Copper Project and has submitted a revised project description to the federal government. Turtle Island Native Network notes the company promises to address key concerns of First Nations . . ."Our initiative to preserve Fish Lake and accommodate the concerns of the Federal Government and First Nations communities is a major commitment and undertaking by Taseko. We look forward to working with all levels of Government, First Nations communities, the City of Williams Lake and with the Cariboo Regional district on moving this project forward in the coming months."

However, the Tsilhqot'in National Government recently made it quite clear the project must remain dead because, "the plan cannot be 'tweaked' to fix its massive flaws".

In January, Chief Marilyn Baptiste, Xeni Gwet'in First Nation asked, "How can it be, after so many years of doggedly saying there was no other way than to drain and destroy our sacred lake, that they suddenly have a new way forward?"

Taseko Mines Limited now says the revised plan addresses the concerns identified during the federal review process. "The proposal greatly reduces environmental impacts, preserves Fish Lake and its aquatics, and enables all mine operations and related components to be contained within one single watershed, a beneficial feature of the original design."

A news release explained that the Company has been assured by the Government of Canada that it wishes to see resource projects developed and that it is not opposed to the mining of the Prosperity ore body, only the way in which it was originally proposed.

Although the firm says it has revised the project plan to address First Nations concerns, it also is made clear in their news release that the project re-design retains much of the original plan, "Taseko is confident that Government agencies and departments will be able to rely on significant portions of the already completed environmental assessments to inform the new assessment and that we anticipate the scope of that assessment to be focused on only what has changed."

Last month Tribal Chair Chief Joe Alphonse said, "The right decision was made and it would be fruitless to look at this project again. The region needs to come up with alternative ways to economically diversify and to work with First Nations to achieve this". ( viewtopic.php?p=12507#p12507 )- - -

Taseko Mines Submits Revised Project Description for the Prosperity Project to Federal Government

VANCOUVER, Feb. 21, 2011

Taseko Mines Limited (TSX: TKO) (NYSE Amex: TGB) ("Taseko" or the "Company") wishes to report that it has submitted a new Project Description for its Prosperity Gold-Copper Project with the Government of Canada.

The revised plan addresses the concerns identified during the federal review process. The proposal greatly reduces environmental impacts, preserves Fish Lake and its aquatics, and enables all mine operations and related components to be contained within one single watershed, a beneficial feature of the original design.

The Company has been assured by the Government of Canada that it wishes to see resource projects developed and that it is not opposed to the mining of the Prosperity ore body, only the way in which it was originally proposed.

Mr. Russell Hallbauer, President & CEO of Taseko, commented; "In 2005 when we initiated engineering work and economic and environmental studies on our Prosperity Project, the long-term price projections for copper and gold were $1.50/lb and $550/oz, respectively. Using these metal price projections, we put forward the best plan to ensure the Project was economically viable; this plan involved the elimination of Fish Lake. The assumptions used were consistent with the Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference and the Project was advanced with both Provincial and Federal agencies as well as with First Nations groups.

In 2009, however, when we were in the middle of presenting our project to the Federal Agencies, short-term metal prices began to rise and new longer-term price projections emerged which indicated both copper and gold prices would be much higher.

Today, price projections for copper average about $2.50/lb and for gold above $1,000/oz - nearly two times the prices we used in our original assessment. It is for this reason that we are now able to consider and advance this new design proposal which adds construction costs and life of mine operating expenditures of approximately $300 million."

Given that the project re-design retains much of the original plan, Taseko is confident that Government agencies and departments will be able to rely on significant portions of the already completed environmental assessments to inform the new assessment and that we anticipate the scope of that assessment to be focused on only what has changed."

Mr. Hallbauer added, "Our initiative to preserve Fish Lake and accommodate the concerns of the Federal Government and First Nations communities is a major commitment and undertaking by Taseko.

We look forward to working with all levels of Government, First Nations communities, the City of Williams Lake and with the Cariboo Regional district on moving this project forward in the coming months."

Russell HallbauerPresident and CEO

No regulatory authority has approved or disapproved of the information contained in this news release.

CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This document contains "forward-looking statements" that were based on Taseko's expectations, estimates and projections as of the dates as of which those statements were made. Generally, these forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "outlook", "anticipate", "project", "target", "believe", "estimate", "expect", "intend", "should" and similar expressions.

Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company's actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These included but are not limited to:

* uncertainties and costs related to the Company's exploration and development activities, such as those associated with continuity of mineralization or determining whether mineral resources or reserves exist on a property;

* uncertainties related to the accuracy of our estimates of mineral reserves, mineral resources, production rates and timing of production, future production and future cash and total costs of production and milling;

* uncertainties related to feasibility studies that provide estimates of expected or anticipated costs, expenditures and economic returns from a mining project;

* uncertainties related to our ability to complete the mill upgrade on time estimated and at the scheduled cost;

* uncertainties related to the ability to obtain necessary licenses permits for development projects and project delays due to third party opposition;

* changes in, and the effects of, the laws, regulations and government policies affecting our exploration and development activities and mining operations, particularly laws, regulations and policies;

* changes in general economic conditions, the financial markets and in the demand and market price for copper, gold and other minerals and commodities, such as diesel fuel, steel, concrete, electricity and other forms of energy, mining equipment, and fluctuations in exchange rates, particularly with respect to the value of the U.S. dollar and Canadian dollar, and the continued availability of capital and financing;

* the effects of forward selling instruments to protect against fluctuations in copper prices and exchange rate movements and the risks of counterparty defaults, and mark to market risk;

* the risk of inadequate insurance or inability to obtain insurance to cover mining risks;

* the risk of loss of key employees; the risk of changes in accounting policies and methods we use to report our financial condition, including uncertainties associated with critical accounting assumptions and estimates;

* environmental issues and liabilities associated with mining including processing and stock piling ore; and

* labour strikes, work stoppages, or other interruptions to, or difficulties in, the employment of labour in markets in which we operate mines, or environmental hazards, industrial accidents or other events or occurrences, including third party interference that interrupt the production of minerals in our mines.

For further information on Taseko, investors should review the Company's annual Form 40-F filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission http://www.sec.com and home jurisdiction filings that are available at http://www.sedar.com.

Taseko Mines Ltd proves it only cares about money – not the environment or rights

Taseko Mine’s Limited is playing costly and dangerous games with First Nations and all British Columbians in its cynical attempt to revive its so-called Prosperity mine, the Tsilhqot’in National Government said today.

“This latest move would be laughable, were the issue not so serious,” said TNG Tribal Chair Chief Joe Alphonse. “Enough is enough. It is time to put an end to this company wasting everybody’s time and resources on a project that most now realize is a dead issue.”

“This latest move by the company leaves little doubt now that its plan all along was to get the cheapest project it could. Now it is desperately trying to find any way it can to revive this project regardless of its impact on the environment and our First Nations rights,” Chief Alphonse said.

“We commend the federal government for seeing through the company’s claim and rejecting its first plan – which the company was told for 17 years was not acceptable – and we also commend Prime Minister Stephen Harper for standing firm on that decision this week,” said TNG Xeni Gwet’in First Nation Chief Marilyn Baptiste.

“Hopefully the federal government, the soon-to-be-elected new provincial premier, and the public will quickly make it clear to Taseko Mines Ltd that this nonsense must end,” said Chief Baptiste.

The latest move by Taseko is so cynical and fatally flawed that that it is hard to see how anyone can take it seriously, Chief Baptiste said.

The company has not consulted with First Nations or the public and it has kept the details secret. It continues to pretend that there is only one issue – the protection of Teztan Biny (Fish Lake) – that needs to be addressed, when the CEAA review panel report and the federal government’s own conclusions made it clear there was numerous and “scathing” problems with the project.

“It seems to think it can insult governments and the public by treating us all as fools with short memories,” said Chief Baptiste.

“This company categorically insisted that – even with soaring gold and copper prices – its first proposal was the only economically viable one. It also categorically insisted that any other options for the project would be even more devastating to the environment and First Nations rights,” said Chief Alphonse.

“Yet within weeks of its proposal being rejected last November 2, it claimed that it could now suddenly afford to go with an alternative that saved Fish Lake, and it is now hoping that everyone will forget that both it and the CEAA review panel report made it clear last year that any alternative to the original plan would be an even bigger disaster.”

Taseko’s new move is costly because it will force governments to spend tax dollars dealing with a clearly unacceptable bid, and could even see the province continue to pump tax dollars into promoting this project on Taseko’s behalf.

It will also force First Nations, who have been on the front line of defending the land against this project, to continue to spend scarce resources that would be better spent on pursuing genuine and sustainable opportunity.

One also has to wonder how excited investors are about the company adding to the $100 million it has already wasted pursuing this doomed project over the last 17 years.

The rebid is dangerous because it seeks to avoid having another full review of the project and have governments accept the new plan as addressing all concerns. If it were to succeed, it would mean the strong federal EA process would be taken over by the weak and industry biased provincial process.

In effect, the company is seeking to undermine the entire process and set a precedent that will give companies a way to proceed with bad projects through the back door.

The new bid also diverts attention away from the real issues facing mining in BC, and the need to reform the mining system to ensure that the industry and first Nation and other governments can work together to identify and pursue good mining projects.

“The company and supporters such as provincial Mines Minster Randy Hawes and Liberal Leadership Candidate’s Christy Clark and Kevin Falcon continue to act as if money is the only issue here.” said Chief Baptiste.

“We are particularly offended that Mr. Hawes has once again implied we are holding out for money and that he will try to buy our support with benefit agreements,” said Chief Baptiste.

“He knows full well that we will never accept this project and that for us that this is not about money. We are not willing to sell out the land, the water and our rights, future generations and way of life at any price. Period.”

- Taseko Mines Limited (TSX: TKO; NYSE Amex: TGB) ("Taseko" or the "Company") has submitted a revised project description to the Federal Government in pursuit of final approval of its New Prosperity Gold-copper Project.The New Prosperity project addresses the concerns identified during the original federal review process while building on the core strengths and benefits of the original Prosperity proposal. The new proposal preserves Fish Lake and limits the impact to the environment. It aims to relieve concerns of the First Nations and the federal Panel while at the same time delivering significant economic value to British Columbia and Canada.

"We have made significant efforts to address all the necessary requirements for final federal approval. Preserving Fish Lake, which adds $300 million in capital and operating expense to the project is an example of that effort and a reflection of the depth of our commitment to the success of New Prosperity and to the principles of sustainability," says Taseko President & CEO Russell Hallbauer.

"Prosperity is the 7th largest undeveloped gold-copper porphyry deposit in the world and as such has the ability to deliver economic value and social benefit on a national scale. We are looking forward to delivering the potential of this project for Canadians, including all levels of Government, First Nations communities, the people of the Cariboo and our shareholders," concluded Mr. Hallbauer.

Taseko is launching an in-depth online information portal (http://newprosperityproject.ca). The site encourages public dialogue and represents a progressive approach to community engagement.

Russell HallbauerPresident and CEO

No regulatory authority has approved or disapproved of the information contained in this news release.

CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This document contains "forward-looking statements" that were based on Taseko's expectations, estimates and projections as of the dates as of which those statements were made. Generally, these forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "outlook", "anticipate", "project", "target", "believe", "estimate", "expect", "intend", "should" and similar expressions.

Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company's actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These included but are not limited to:

a.. uncertainties and costs related to the Company's exploration and development activities, such as those associated with continuity of mineralization or determining whether mineral resources or reserves exist on a property;b.. uncertainties related to the accuracy of our estimates of mineral reserves, mineral resources, production rates and timing of production, future production and future cash and total costs of production and milling;c.. uncertainties related to feasibility studies that provide estimates of expected or anticipated costs, expenditures and economic returns from a mining project;d.. uncertainties related to our ability to complete the mill upgrade on time estimated and at the scheduled cost;e.. uncertainties related to the ability to obtain necessary licenses permits for development projects and project delays due to third party opposition;f.. uncertainties related to unexpected judicial or regulatory proceedings;g.. changes in, and the effects of, the laws, regulations and government policies affecting our exploration and development activities and mining operations, particularly laws, regulations and policies;h.. changes in general economic conditions, the financial markets and in the demand and market price for copper, gold and other minerals and commodities, such as diesel fuel, steel, concrete, electricity and other forms of energy, mining equipment, and fluctuations in exchange rates, particularly with respect to the value of the U.S. dollar and Canadian dollar, and the continued availability of capital and financing;i.. the effects of forward selling instruments to protect against fluctuations in copper prices and exchange rate movements and the risks of counterparty defaults, and mark to market risk;j.. the risk of inadequate insurance or inability to obtain insurance to cover mining risks;k.. the risk of loss of key employees; the risk of changes in accounting policies and methods we use to report our financial condition, including uncertainties associated with critical accounting assumptions and estimates;l.. environmental issues and liabilities associated with mining including processing and stock piling ore; andm.. labour strikes, work stoppages, or other interruptions to, or difficulties in, the employment of labour in markets in which we operate mines, or environmental hazards, industrial accidents or other events or occurrences, including third party interference that interrupt the production of minerals in our mines.For further information on Taseko, investors should review the Company's annual Form 40-F filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission http://www.sec.com and home jurisdiction filings that are available at http://www.sedar.com.

- The Tsilhqot'in view Taseko Mines Ltd.'s (TML) so-called "New Prosperity" proposal as equally dangerous as the first - the integrity of Teztan Biny and its surrounding environment are not 'saved' by literally surrounding this sacred lake by one of the world's largest open pits, a tailings pond designed for 720 million tons of toxic waste, nor by continuing to destroy Little Fish Lake and Fish Creek. The impacts clearly articulated in the "scathing" 2010 Federal Review Panel Report, and acknowledged by the federal government's rejection of the project in November 2010, are not addressed by simply re-packaging an already assessed proposal.

The Tsilhqot'in Nation call on the Federal and Provincial governments to reject this re-application because it does not address the issues raised by the Panel in its report, and because the proponent TML lacks all credibility and is undeniably abusing a process at the expense of the taxpayers and the communities.

The Federal Review Panel recognized that TML's alternative plans also had significant adverse impacts and that "the proximity of the open pit and associated mining facilities would be close enough to Teztan Biny (Fish Lake) to eliminate the intrinsic value of the area to First Nations even if another alternative were chosen." Therefore the threat to Tsilhqot'in rights, title and the integrity of this environmentally sensitive region are not addressed by TML's repackaged plan, and the Tsilhqot'in Nation stands firm that no amount of money can justify destruction of this magnitude.

"This equally damaging proposal was submitted with zero consultation with the Tsilhqot'in Nation who in fact received the submission after it had already been sent to both governments. TML's attempts to 'revive' the mine proposal without the Tsilhqot'in Nation's input or consent is a clear signal that the company does not understand Tsilhqot'in rights and culture, and lacks respect for the environment and our communities. The Prosperity Project is dead!" declared Chief Joe Alphonse, Tribal Chairman of the Tsilhqot'in Nation and Chief of Tl'etinqox-t'in.

Grand Chief Stewart Philip, President of the Union of BC Indian Chiefs, stated: "The Federal Review Panel already reviewed this 'so-called' alternative proposal. During the course of the previous public hearings, Taseko Mine officials admitted 'all other options would be far more destructive in nature' than their original proposal being promoted by the company. Clearly Taseko Mines Ltd. has no credibility."

"The Tsilhqot'in Nation has been working to build relationships with the Federal and Provincial Government. Acceptance by them for a company that has unequivocally displayed bad faith to our communities is not acceptable and will not be tolerated. It definitely would show that the governments are not standing up to their fiduciary obligations. We call on both governments to respect and stand by the Tsilhqot'in Nation's decision to protect this area from mining and the principles of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)," declares Marilyn Baptiste, Chief of Tsilhqot'in People of Xeni Gwet'in.

The Tsilhqot'in National Government today welcomed the unanimous decision by the Assembly of First Nations' Chiefs-in-Assembly in Moncton to help the Nation defend its lands against a bid to revive one of the worst mining proposals in BC history.

"This is as important as the Chiefs-in-Assembly's pledge last year to support us in defending our lands against the original proposal, and the opposition to this repackaged but equally bad mine is as strong as ever," said Chief Joe Alphonse, Tribal Chair, Tsilhqot'in National Government (TNG), who moved the motion.

"The federal government upheld the honour of the Crown last year by rejecting the original devastating proposal," said Chief Alphonse. "The renewed support of the AFN gives us the confidence that we are on the right track. As Indigenous Peoples, it's not always about economics, but about the environment that we live with. We don't just look at things for the next 20 years, but for many generations into the future. The Prosperity deposit lies in a sacred and sensitive region where mining is not acceptable."

The Chiefs-in-Assembly resolution states the AFN "will stand behind the Tsilhqot'in Nation in defence of these lands regardless of whether the Federal and Provincial governments deem the new proposal worthy of review or approval."

It cautions that approval of this project by the federal government "would demonstrate utter disregard for the survival of First Nations as distinctive cultures within Canada and it would ignore the recent commitment to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples." It also advises that approval would seriously undermine the integrity of the environmental assessment process and First Nations faith in it.

The TNG's Chief Francis Laceese of Tl'esqox, who seconded the motion, said: "We have national support because this raises national issues, as all First Nations across the country continue to strive for our way of life and respect for our inherent rights that include protection of the environment for future generations. We call on the federal government to recognize that this bid is at least as bad as the one it rejected last year after accepting the findings of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency review panel, which then Environment Minister Jim Prentice called "scathing" and "probably the most condemning" he had ever seen."

Chief Baptiste said: "Our annual gatherings demonstrate that we continue to rely upon the Teztan Biny (Fish Lake) region and this was recognized by the Federal Review Panel as a key reason why Teztan Biny (Fish Lake), Yanah Biny (Little Fish Lake), Nabas, and downstream salmon stocks are all integral to Tsilhqot'in health and well-being, and why the proposed mine alternative is actually worse for the Tsilhqot'in and the environment." All of these areas continue to be threatened with total destruction by the company's new proposal.

The Tsilhqot'in National Government today called on the Federal government to halt the continuous drain on everyone's time and resources and to reject Taseko Mines Ltd's (TML) second rebid for the Prosperity Mine project.

"If the Canadian government wants to reduce its deficit, then cancel this process. It will prevent the frivolous spending of tax money consistently being wasted to review a mine that will not go through," said TNG Tribal Chair Chief Joe Alphonse. "Today's announcement by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency merely finds that the company has finally completed their project description up to the point where a next step could be considered. The fact remains that this bid, which was presented to the previous Expert Panel and deemed worse than the original plan, fails to address any of the environmentally scathing issues that led to the first proposal being rejected,"

"Surrounding our sacred lake with an open pit mine, preventing access to it for 33 or more years, destroying its fish spawning grounds and most likely destroying the lake later as it receives toxic tailings or the mine expands is clearly not an improvement," said Marilyn Baptiste, Chief, Xeni Gwet'in.

Chief Alphonse and Chief Baptiste ask Prime Minister Stephen Harper to honourably stand by the leadership his government demonstrated in November last year when it emphatically rejected the original mine proposal and showed that while mining is important, it cannot be supported at any cost. The Chiefs noted that the rebid option now before the CEAA is one that the company itself declared last year would be worse for the environment than the original plan - a point echoed in the CEAA review panel report, which then Environment Minister Jim Prentice called "scathing" and "probably the most condemning" he had ever read.

The only major change is that instead of killing Teztan Biny outright, it would render it inaccessible, destroy the smaller adjacent lake that is essential to its self contained wild trout ecosystem, and leave open the option of killing the lake later during the proposed extended 33-year lifetime of the mine. The plan does not address the impact on endangered grizzly-bear and their habitat and in no way removes the irreversible damage to current and future First Nations title and rights, including archaeological and cultural sites.

"At this very moment the Tsilhqot'in are in the middle of the salmon season, blessed with the Chilko salmon run - one of North America's strongest remaining runs," said Chief Alphonse. "We cannot imagine risking this irreplaceable resource, which would be threatened by the toxic mine discharge. Everyone from commercial fishermen to the Cohen Commission should be standing with us to protect this resource."

The Tsilhqot'in Nation is concerned that proceeding further with this rebid will detract from efforts to pursue more sustainable developments in the region, the sustainable developments that BC Mines Minister Rich Coleman earlier this year said was his new priority. Chief Baptiste noted: "The company has not cleaned up the mess it made when drilling and testing for its original bid and we do not support even more damage while this is a clearly pointless rebid."

There is solid, national opposition to this project from First Nations along with people from all walks of life. The Assembly of First Nations Chiefs in Assembly last month passed its second resolution renewing its 2010 pledge to help defend Tsilhqot'in lands against this project and cautioning the federal government against approving this project. "It would be irresponsible if Mr. Harper's government did not appropriately consider the environment and its constitutional and international obligations to safeguard First Nations rights," said Chief Baptiste.

"Acceptance of the project description ensures the Federal Government's environmental assessment of New Prosperity will begin on or before November 7, 2011. With this decision we have a clear view of the regulatory timeline ahead. Under a comprehensive study, which is the process we expect for New Prosperity, CEAA will have 365 days in which to complete its review and submit a final report to the Federal Minister of the Environment," said Russell Hallbauer President and CEO of Taseko.

"New Prosperity is a unique opportunity for British Columbia, First Nations and Canada as a whole. Taseko has made significant efforts to address the concerns identified during the original Federal review process. In particular, the preservation of Fish Lake, which adds $300 million in capital and operating expense to the project, is a strong example of the Company's commitment to the success of New Prosperity and to the principles of sustainable mining," added Mr. Hallbauer.

New Prosperity is the largest undeveloped gold-copper deposit in Canada and the 7th largest in the world. With Taseko's proven leadership and commitment to excellence in responsible mining, this project promises to create vital economic and social value for the Province. In particular, the Cariboo-Chilcotin region will benefit by generating 700 construction jobs for two years and 550 new direct jobs and 1280 indirect jobs during its 20 year operating life.

The complete project description, including an executive summary of New Prosperity can be viewed at http://www.newprosperityproject.ca, a website built for the express purpose of engaging the community in conversation around the New Prosperity Gold-Copper Project.

ATTEMPT TO REVIVE PROPOSED PROSPERITY MINE MUST END NOWCompany submits option already reviewed and found to be worse than original plan

OTTAWA, October 19, 2011: The Tsilhqot’in Nation, supported by BC and national chiefs, today called on the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEAA) and the federal government to reject the re-bid Prosperity mine project without further waste of time and tax dollars.

“The company is on record admitting this new option is worse than the one that was rejected last year, and a CEAA review panel has already agreed with that assessment,” said Chief Joe Alphonse, Chair of the Tsilhqot’in National Government, which represents six First Nations. “To proceed any further will place an unjustified burden on us and on taxpayers and will demonstrate the excessive influence that this company, its lobbyists and hired guns have on government.”

Xeni Gwet’in Chief Marilyn Baptiste said: “It is obvious there are no grounds for wasting more time on a project that has already been deemed worse than its rejected predecessor. This company’s attempt to ignore the myriad of devastating impacts from either version of this project tells us that they have learned nothing from the previous rejection, or about how to respect our rights and culture.”

Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, President of the Union of BC Indian Chiefs said: “First Nations across BC and Canada strongly oppose this project. To have permitted it last year would have destroyed faith in the EA process and shown utter disregard for First Nations’ culture and rights. To allow this even worse project to proceed would be unthinkable. It is the poster child for all that is wrong with the mining system, and a source of confrontation and mistrust that makes it difficult to find a way to work together.”

Last summer, the CEAA review panel report stated that Taseko Mines Ltd’s proposed Prosperity mine would have devastating and immitigable impacts on fisheries and wildlife and on existing and future First Nations rights. It concurred with the company’s own assessment that the option that is now being pushed would be even worse. Ottawa emphatically rejected the project, with then-environment minister Jim Prentice calling the panel’s report “scathing” and “probably the most condemning” he had ever read.

Chief Baptiste said: “The federal government did the right thing last year when it upheld its Constitutional duty to protect First Nations’ rights and its responsibility to the environment. No amount of costly reviews will change this. We are looking for that same leadership again, so let’s end this now.”

Chief Alphonse said: “The CEAA is expected to announce next steps on November 7, and logic would dictate that it should refuse to proceed any further. Why should other, more sustainable projects be put on the backburner while we deal with a bid that is even worse than the one we have already rejected? Let us focus on more positive initiatives for our people and for the region, and let’s prevent the company from adding to the damage it has already caused on our territories by doing further drilling and exploration in pursuit of a project that can never proceed.”