On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
<zeeshanak gnome org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano fidencio org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
>> <zeeshanak gnome org> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano fidencio org> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
>>>> <zeeshanak gnome org> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano fidencio org> wrote:
>>>>>> Add a new entity called OsinfoInstallScriptAvatar to help the creation
>>>>>> of an Avatar file for an install script. If avatar entity needs to be
>>>>>> set, just add, in the .xml's script file:
>>>>>> <avatar>
>>>>>> <image-type>...</image-type>
>>>>>> <extension>...</extension>
>>>>>> <alpha>...</alpha>
>>>>>> <width>...</width>
>>>>>> <height>...</height>
>>>>>> </avatar>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't quit follow one major thing here: What is the direction of the
>>>>> OsinfoInstallScriptAvatar? Is app setting it on libosinfo or app
>>>>> getting it from libosinfo? How would a typical usage look like?
>>>>
>>>> App is getting it from libosinfo. With this entity, we can drop
>>>> AvatarFormat boxes' class and get this info from install-script.
>>>
>>> Ah ok so its all about script telling app that if it needs to add a
>>> user avatar, which format it needs to be in? If so, how does app know
>>> which filename to use with avatar?
>>
>> How is it done in gnome-boxes?
>
> You are writing the Boxes patch so you tell me. :) If you are asking
> about existing code, it simply uses the username + extention as the
> filename. We'll need a way to create/get avatar filename for/to the
> application. My idea would be to treat this similar to how we deal
> with windows XP's .cmd and .reg files. They are not scripts either but
> we treat them as such.
>
> BTW, how does this patch work with your avatar releted code in commit 1d9822ae ?
Hmmm. Looks like we need to improve OsinfoInstallScriptAvatar to
support, beyond what is supported:
- mount point
- source path
- destination path
- disk format (what is being done in the XSL)
- filename
With these stuffs, I think we can replace all "hardcoded" information
about avatar.
What do you think?
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
> FSF member#5124
Best Regards,
--
Fabiano Fidêncio