Know anything about Sharia Law?
If Obama’s Sharia Law Czar, Dalia Mogahed, has anything to do with it, you wont get the real truth.

Obama's Sharia Law Czar, Dalia Mogahed

And if you don’t bother to learn about Sharia Law from Truth Revealing sources, you deserve to live under Sharia Law in the United States of America. Sharia is pronounced shaa•′Ree•aah

Start getting educated or start preparing for Sharia Law

Where to start your education… go to a truth telling expert:

Dr. Wafa Sultan, a former Muslim who was born into Sharia Law as a native, born and raised in Baniyas, Syria, now a Syrian-American, knows the reality of life under Sharia Law first hand.

Let Dr. Wafa Sultan be your guide…

Dr. Sultan is about to publish a book to be called A God Who Hates: The Courageous Woman Who Inflamed the Muslim World Speaks Out Against the Evils of Radical Islam. It is to be released on Tuesday, October 13, 2009.

193 Responses to Obama Supports Sharia Law in America? His Sharia Law Czar Does

We all get a daily reminder of Sharia Law because the news covers the bomb martyrs and brutality against ppl in the middle east every day… Only assfaces would welcome that barbaric servitude in a free society. Generally they are Liberals.

CNSNews.com) – Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announced Tuesday that she is pursuing plans to remove some captured illegal aliens from “prison-like or jail-like circumstances” and put them in converted hotels and nursing homes.

“To better manage detention operations, ICE will develop a risk assessment and custody classification, which will enable detainees to be placed in an appropriate facility,” DHS said in a statement. “ICE will pursue detention strategies based on assessed risk and reduce costs by exploring the use of converted hotels, nursing homes and other residential facilities.”

Napolitano explained her department’s thinking at a press conference at Immigration and Customs Enforcement headquarters in Washington, D.C.

“Our detention system has some who have committed crimes, others whose crimes under federal law is a misdemeanor, others who have as I said before not committed a crime at all,” Napolitano said.

DHS detained about 378,000 aliens last year, who at any given time “occupy 32,000 to 34,000 beds across the country,” Napolitano said at her press conference. She said DHS would likely end its contractual relationships with at least some detention facilities currently holding illegal immigrants.

The department, Napolitano said, intended “to review all contracts for detention facilities to identify not only opportunities for improvement but also for renegotiation and indeed termination where warranted.”

Napolitano noted that DHS will develop detention strategies based on assessed risk that will reduce costs and put illegal aliens “near immigration service providers.” These strategies will include pursuing the use of non-prison-like housing.

“As was said, this is a system that encompasses many different types of detainees, not all of whom need to be held in prison-like circumstances or jail-like circumstances, which not only may be unnecessary but more expensive than necessary,” said Napolitano.

“We will begin to house nonviolent non-criminals, such as newly arrived asylum seekers, at facilities commensurate with the risks that they present,” said Napolitano. “And we will also begin efforts to house these populations near immigration service providers and pursue different options like converted hotels or residential facilities for their detentions.”

Napolitano said DHS and ICE would provide a plan to Congress on that she called ‘alternatives to detention.’

“We will develop an assessment tool to identify those aliens suitable for alternatives to detention,” she said. “And we will submit a plan to Congress this fall to implement such a nationwide system.”

When CNSNews.com asked to clarify Wednesday what DHS means by “Alternatives to Detention” (ATD) that it is considering using in dealing with captured illegal aliens who are awaiting deportation or potential deportation, Gillian Brigham, a spokeswoman with ICE, said “a range of alternatives” were being considered, including releasing and supervising, rather than detaining, some illegal aliens who have been arrested.

“‘Alternatives to Detention’ is kind of a range of things, and that includes stuff like electronic monitoring or intensive supervision, where people come and report into an office three times a week to a certain deportation officer there. Or have some sort of electronic monitoring,” Brigham said.

As many as 15,000 illegal aliens are already in ATD program, Brigham said.

Brigham said it would be up to ICE officers and case workers to decide whether a non-criminal illegal alien is placed in the “less restrictive” detention in a converted hotel, nursing home or other residential facilities, released and monitored electronically, or required to report to an ICE office a specific number of times per week.

CNSNews.com asked Napolitano if the “alternatives to detention” program would be modeled on the catch-and-release system previously used in federal immigration enforcement. This involved releasing captured illegal aliens into the general population pending a court date. Many did not show up for the court proceeding.

The catch-and-release policy was ended during the Bush administration.

“No, you’re right,” said Napolitano. “And catch-and-release was problematic, and I can say that. I was governor of Arizona, and before that I was the attorney general of Arizona. So, we see what worked and what didn’t work.

“And so one of—two of the issues that we need to make sure are covered as we look at alternatives to detention are, A, that those who are given ATD are not going to use that to escape, basically, or get into the general population in a way that we can’t quickly find them and get them back,” Napolitano added.

She said that another problem with alternatives to detention in the past is that it often actually prolonged adjudication of illegal aliens’ immigration case.

“A second is as follows,” said Napolitano. “One of the things that was happening over time because we were detaining so many, and will continue that as we do immigration enforcement, was that if somebody was given an alternative to detention, then they were kind of put at the back of the line in regards to actually having their status adjudicated.

“And so they were actually kind of in detention longer than they would have been if they’d simply been held and gone to an immigration court, had their status adjudicated and the removal completed,” she said.

Janice Kephart, national security policy director at the Center for Immigration Studies, believes that “alternatives to detention” is just another name for the failed “catch and release” model.

“‘Alternatives to Detention’ is just another way to say ‘Catch and Release,’ which was the thorn in the side of the prior administration until they stopped it and put rule of law in place,” said Kephart.

“Although managing detention facilities and their populations well is a good goal, simply doing it by reducing the illegal population and dispersing them back into American communities does not help enforce immigration law or make our communities more secure,” Kephart said.

Kephart pointed out that Mir Aimal Kansi, who murdered two CIA employees outside the agency’s Langley, Va., headquarters; Ramzi Yousef, who masterminded the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center; and Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, who inspired the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center, had all been asylum applicants who were left free in the United States.

Well in case anyone missed it, Michael Steele:
“The real question Americans are asking is, ‘What has President Obama actually accomplished?’ It is unfortunate that the president’s star power has outshined tireless advocates who have made real achievements working towards peace and human rights. One thing is certain – President Obama won’t be receiving any awards from Americans for job creation, fiscal responsibility, or backing up rhetoric with concrete action.”

Hey guys the upside is that when we expend all our wealth here and Obummuh puts us into a new world order like Rockefeller is pushing, then we can all sit back and get paid by the richest -like Oprah, Gore, Gates, Soros…. They’ll be the top earners supporting earth. A little Leftist logic will carry us in the end afterall… Awww..

The socialist plan to ram this right down the throats of the american people.

Hoyer Won’t Rule Out Voting on Senate Health Bill Without Changes and Sending it Directly to President
Wednesday, October 07, 2009

(CNSNews.com) – House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) won’t rule out having the House vote on the Senate health-care bill without making any changes in it, which would allow the bill to go directly to President Barack Obama without having to pass through a House-Senate conference committee and another round of votes in the House and Senate–and a longer period of public scrutiny of what the text of the proposed law actually says.

“I won’t rule it out or in because I don’t know what the package is,” Hoyer told CNSNews.com on Tuesday.

“However, content will be critical in what action the House takes,” he added a moment later.

Under the proposal, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) would offer the Senate’s version of health reform as an amendment to a House-passed bill, H.R. 1586, which levies a 90-percent tax on bonuses received this year by employees of financial institutions that took at least $5 billion in government bailout money. Reid’s amendment would strip out the substance of H.R. 1586 as passed by the House and replace it with the entirety of the Senate health care bill.

As a senior aide to Reid explained to CNSNews.com, this would be done because the Constitution only allows the House to initiate revenue bills, and since the Senate health care bill contains revenue provisions it technically cannot be initiated in the Senate. By being amended into the “shell” of H.R. 1586, which is a House-initiated revenue bill, the Senate health care bill would technically become a House bill.

If Reid can muster enough votes (60) to overcome a filibuster of this maneuver and filibusters of any amendments subsequently made to the bill, Senate Democrats could pass their health care bill and send it back to the House, where it nominally originated. See related story here.

Normally, when a bill is passed in two different versions, negotiators from both the House and Senate meet in a conference committee to amend the bill and arrive at a final version, which is then passed by both chambers and sent to the president.

However, if the House were to pass H.R. 1586 when it comes back from the Senate without adding any amendments, the bill would not need to go to a conference committee and could be sent straight to the president for his signature.

Such a course of events could greatly shorten the time the public has to study and debate the final text of the health care bill–which will be crafted by Senate Majority Leader Reid in consultation with whomever he chooses to consult. News reports say Reid’s office is now working closely with the White House on the final language of the bill.

On Tuesday, CNSNews.com asked Hoyer: “The Senate is considering using H.R. 1586–a bill that already passed the House, some bonuses received by TARP recipients–as a shell to hold their health care bill. In other words, they would amend 1586 to include their entire language of their health bill and then send it to the House.

“If that happens, will you rule out holding a direct vote on the Senate health care package in that form, which would send it to the president without amending it or sending it to conference?”

Hoyer said: “Well, I won’t rule it out or in because I don’t know what that package is, nor does the Senate at this point [because] they still have the necessity to harmonize the HELP [Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee] bill and the Finance [Committee] bill. So it would be premature for me to answer that question because I don’t know exactly what form it’s going to be in.

“Having said that, obviously the reason they’re doing that, as you well understand, is because there are component parts of their bill that would need to be generated in the House, under the Constitution would need to be initiated by the House. That’s a House bill and it’s a useful vehicle for them to use, so that is why it would be premature for me to say that I support moving that as is at this point in time.”

CNSNews.com: “So it depends on the content of the bill, not the way they get it to the House?”

Hoyer: “Yep. Constitutionally, there are some reasons why it has to be a House bill. However, content will be critical in what action the House takes.”

Sharia law is…. Incomprehensible. And they must truly be ignorant of seperations of religion and governance for Liberals to accomodate this. They’ll do anything for a vote for power… Superficial dolts.

My husband couldn’t believe the direct IRS access to personal financial records or the gov’t access to bank accounts that was in HR3200… And Cap and Trade is equally encroaching. He says we will move if our country does that to us.

Tellit – people ignore that which either frightens them or overwhelms them. When I fly out to see my brother in Iowa, I go through Detroit. It has the largest Muslim population (Arabic) in the US. Signs in the airport are Arabic and English. I asked a woman in a native dress all about it and she was so talking down to me. She said “you are unaware of our contributions to the world.” I finally looked her straight in the eyes and said “We are not all culturally and historically dumb here. We acknowledge and KNOW about your culture and contributions.”

we wont unravel this by moving, but I well understand the feelings….
m2 says

My husband couldn’t believe the direct IRS access to personal financial records or the gov’t access to bank accounts that was in HR3200… And Cap and Trade is equally encroaching. He says we will move if our country does that to us.

Dhimmis must hide any evidence of their religion:
*They are forbidden to openly display wine or pork (A: to ring church bells or display crosses) recite the torah or evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays; (Reliance of the Traveller; Shafi law 11.5 (6) p 608)

Baha Uddin, who lives near the church, had complained he was unable to use his garden at weekends and his one-year-old daughter was regularly disturbed by the noise from services.

He said: ‘It’s been a nightmare. I’ve not been able to use my garden or living room on a Sunday because of the church services. The amplified music, drums and the loud sermons made having a conversation impossible. The noise made me depressed.’

But other neighbours say the noise is not a problem. The church lodged an appeal, and appeared at Waltham Forest magistrates’ court on Tuesday.

In court Mrs Odetoyinbo, 55, claimed a council officer had asked her ‘to keep the noise down so as not to offend the Muslim community’.

But magistrates rejected the appeal, and ordered the church to pay £2,250 costs.

Pelosi to Republicans: ‘I’m in My Place’ as House Speaker
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was taking issue with a National Republican Congressional Committee press release that accused her of backing down to liberals in her caucus who oppose Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal’s recommendation for an escalation of troops in Afghanistan

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi cast House Republicans as behind the times, or worse, after they suggested that the top American commander in Afghanistan should “put her in her place.”

“They really don’t understand how inappropriate that is,” the California Democrat said of the phrasing, contained in a news release this week from the National Republican Congressional Committee.

“I’m in my place. I’m the Speaker of the House, the first woman Speaker of the House. And I’m in my place because the House of Representatives voted me there,” she added. “But that language is something I haven’t even heard in decades.”

She was taking issue with a National Republican Congressional Committee press release that accused her of backing down to liberals in her caucus who oppose Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal’s recommendation for an escalation of troops in Afghanistan.

Pelosi had been quoted as saying that voting for an escalation was a difficult choice for members of her caucus whose constituents oppose such action.

“If Nancy Pelosi’s failed economic policies are any indicator of the effect she may have on Afghanistan, taxpayers can only hope McChrystal is able to put her in her place,” the release said.

McChrystal’s recommended approach calls for as many as 40,000 additional troops in Afghanistan for a counterinsurgency campaign to defeat the Taliban, build up the central government and deny al-Qaida a haven.

Many Democrats, aware of rising anti-war sentiment in their ranks and the war protests that have dotted Washington this week, oppose such a surge.

According to a new Associated Press-GfK poll, public support for the war has dropped to 40 percent from 44 percent in July.

You guys should know I’m being over the top. America is the last and great vestige of hope and freedom… I feel that more than anyone. The world is a dark and uncertain place plagued by feel good egg heads and con men without us. We have the American spirit endowed by our creator and protected by our constitution. Barack Obama doesn’t apparently.

Yea SH I saw that one. thanks. People in this country will not stand for sharia law. We have a smaller population of moslems than Europe. It’s too bad we have a moslem and a moslem sympathizer in the Whitehouse.

Ok I have a printed copy of Obama’s speech. I guess he was late cause they had a hard time waking him this morning. Here’s the speech,

I want to start by saying blah, blah ,blan and I am of course blah blah blah, me and I blah blah blah, so then I will blah blah blah, me to blah blah blah I thank you for waitng for my late as usual ass to show up.

I second Samiam’s suggestion make unemployment a profession!! The sad part is I bet one of his Czars has proposed that very option in an effert to fudge the numbers, all I know is I have a growing resume for the title professionally unemployed!

Somehow Nobel and Obama just don’t fit together, I wonder if I said I could feed the world with sheep droppings if I would be considered “Nobel” hey I said it and I mean it, why not give me the prize, you have set the precedent that “words are more powerful than actions” Everyone a big cheer for the Swiss!!!

French Muslim Nuclear Engineer Arrested in France for Contacts with Al-Qaeda

Yesterday the French police arrested two Muslims accused of having contact with the North African cell of Al-Qaeda: “Al-Qaida pour le Maghreb Islamique” (Aqmi).
Today it was reported that one of them (they are brothers) is a nuclear engineer working at the most advanced site of nuclear research, Geneva’s CERN (CEntre de Recherche Nucléaire), Europe’s most guarded site of top nuclear research.

Both are French citizens of Algerian origin (Muslims)
This arrest, according with most articles, would be a most important step to discover the links of the aforementioned terrorist organization in Europe.

The two are suspected to have given information about some sites to attack in France.

The police are working on 2 computers, 3 HDs and some USB keys confiscated to the two.
“Perhaps we have avoided the worst” declared the French Minister of Home Affairs.

This also raise some concern about the security of nuclear facilities employing personnel who, for their origin and/or religion, could be “sensitive to islamist doctrines.”
(Much thanks to QK for translation)

Barack Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize on a nomination submitted ten whole days into his term of office in part due to his effort in “easing American conflicts with Muslim nations.” Helming that effort is Dalia Mogahed, Obama’s advisor on Muslim affairs, who gave British television viewers a taste of how Obama won the Nobel. She explained that the oppressive shari’a law that results in stonings, mainly for women, is actually “gender justice”, which might be news to women’s-rights groups around the world:

President Barack Obama’s adviser on Muslim affairs, Dalia Mogahed, has provoked controversy by appearing on a British television show hosted by a member of an extremist group to talk about Sharia Law.

Miss Mogahed, appointed to the President’s Council on Faith-Based and Neighbourhood Partnerships, said the Western view of Sharia was “oversimplified” and the majority of women around the world associate it with “gender justice”.

The White House adviser made the remarks on a London-based TV discussion programme hosted by Ibtihal Bsis, a member of the extremist Hizb ut Tahrir party. …

During the 45-minute discussion, on the Islam Channel programme Muslimah Dilemma earlier this week, the two members of the group made repeated attacks on secular “man-made law” and the West’s “lethal cocktail of liberty and capitalism”.

They called for Sharia Law to be “the source of legislation” and said that women should not be “permitted to hold a position of leadership in government”.

Miss Mogahed made no challenge to these demands and said that “promiscuity” and the “breakdown of traditional values” were what Muslims admired least about the West.

Gender justice? Under shari’a, a woman’s testimony in court only counts for half of that of a man. If a woman is raped, she needs four male witnesses to prove her case. If she makes the accusation and doesn’t find four witnesses, the victim gets charged with fornication or adultery and faces death.

Under what definition of “gender justice” does that fall? The laws of shari’a deliberately make women chattel to their husbands, fathers, or brothers. Its application keeps women in some countries from being allowed to venture out in public on their own, without an adult male family member to accompany them.

Instead of defending the rights of women and secular application of law, which is the basis of our law, the advisor of the President of the United States fails to answer a demand for the imposition of an extreme religious code on free people. Mogahed also never rebutted the notion that women should not hold public office, which directly challenged her own status, but also insulted many women in American public life in both parties. I wonder what Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton think about that performance.

If that’s the kind of outreach that wins Nobel Peace prizes, then the Norwegians must value the oppression of women in Muslim countries and the Western nations that appease that oppression.

Update: Apologies to all Swedes. I know it’s Norwegians that hand out the award, but for some reason I wrote “Swedes”. Coffee deficiency.

I wish I had man ic. That’s Scottish you know. That’s what Scotswomen say when they are without. Actually, I think the Scots would be the toughest ones to harness to sharia law. Give up skirts for a burka – hell no. Remember, I forget the war but the Scots Guards were called “the Ladies fromHell.”

I am praying for all our son’s and daughter’s serving in our military here and abroad who have been abandoned by this President. This man is a terrible example of the black race and an embarrassment to the United States of America.

I also understand Beck making a point about big corrupt companies using the illegals as slave labor, BUT using ONLY the SOUTH as an example really pissed me off!!! It was NOT just the South that had slaves, but also the NORTH!!! Of course he’s from where???
Oh yeah……hmmmmmm……guess he didn’t read up on the Reconstruction of the South or how folks lost everything even those that NEVER owned slaves…..crapola!!! I’m usually so in line with Beck—I mean it’s uncanny how alike we think on things…..

I just sent in a donation earlier this week to the USO—-I’m gonna figure out now what to send to help those boys in Afghanistan…..
This betrayal is just like F—ing Vietnam!!!! Give them the weapons and tech to WIN or bring them home!!!! But DON’T LEAVE them there to DIE because the traitor has no balls to take action!!!

And the “piece-of-crap-maker is just crap outta luck if he thinks us Texan gals are gonna wear that tent stuff that HIS forefathers deem right for gals to wear!!!
He a’int taking my ballcap or straw hat…without the fight of their life!! hahaaa

my son is due home in Dec, unless they send them to to the other one???
At this point, I really want him home, but I also hope they go to help the guys in Afghanistan……and HOPE, with the re-enforcements, they can END the crap, once and for all!!!

my son is due home in Dec, unless they send them to to the other one???
At this point, I really want him home, but I also hope they go to help the guys in Afghanistan……and HOPE, with the re-enforcements, they can END the crap, once and for all!!!

O’Reilly is telling it like it is….”The Piece-maker” didn’t do a dang thing to EARN that prize!!! So many have really DONE PEACE MAKING and for this jokester to win that prize has done NOTHING but reduce that HONOR to that of a cheap carnival prize!

Samh
Yeah I saw that! Glad to see another that knows REAL history. ;-}
As to the illegals, another thing that occurs, least it did to my oldest son, the ‘bossman’ extorts money from them in order for them to keep their jobs.
My son worked for a VERY well known major corp president-owner doing some landscaping. The guy that hired him and his friend was great and paid them very well for their hard work. Then the guy went on vacation and another filled in for him and come payday, the “boss replacement” told them they had to give him money to keep their jobs just like the illegals did or they would be ‘replaced’.
Of course they refused and brought this to the OWNERS attention and he did NOTHING about it—they lost their jobs over it anyway, while the temp boss kept his job….

VF
The ‘dems’ have this crap down to an art form!!! Guys like that Morris Dees from he Southern Poverty Law Center is a racist bastard and claims to be a ‘civil rights’ advocate, but ALL he is interested in is making money and keeping those ‘he protects’, under neath him and in his control.
That is EXACTLY what this present day “Dem” party is all about. They want those that are without to stay without so THEY can have it all. The brainwashed masses are just too dumbed-down to SEE what is happening to them and believe the lies they are told.

I won’t comment other than to point readers to these two stories showing that, as Kevin Jackson re-iterates over and again, the roots of institutional, American racism are in the Democratic party going all the way back to the Civil War. Jimmy Carter appears to be guilty of projection when he accuses others of racism.

The prospect of black and white children commingling on the streets on their way to school was apparently so horrible to Carter that he requested that the state school board stop construction of the black school until a new site could be found.

Upon receiving the endorsement of former Democratic Gov. Lester Maddox, Carter responded by praising the life-long segregationist: “He has brought a standard of forthright expression and personal honesty to the governor’s office, and I hope to live up to his standard.” Maddox had not only refused to serve blacks in the restaurant he once owned, but he had also greeted civil rights protesters with a gun, and made sticks available to his white customers with which to intimidate them.

*
Lol_normal
SalHansen: SERIOUSLY. Can ANY ONE please explain what Obama achieved in his first two weeks as President that merits a Nobel Prize? #nobel #p2 #nobelol
8 minutes ago from web · Reply · View Tweet

*
John-avatar_normal
jks4usc: RT @cbyington: They’re selling Nobel Prizes at the grocery store now. Right next to the Charmin. #nobeLOL [thx, one of the best yet!]
9 minutes ago from TweetDeck · Reply · View Tweet

This just in… DNC to people who tell jokes about the President… You are all Terrorists!

LOLOLOLOLOL!!!! DNC? Go FISK YOURSELF!

from the dnc:

The worldwide derision has a Democratic National Committee flack comparing jokesters to…terrorists:

“The Republican Party has thrown in its lot with the terrorists – the Taliban and Hamas this morning – in criticizing the President for receiving the Nobel Peace prize,” DNC communications director Brad Woodhouse told POLITICO. “Republicans cheered when America failed to land the Olympics and now they are criticizing the President of the United States for receiving the Nobel Peace prize – an award he did not seek but that is nonetheless an honor in which every American can take great pride – unless of course you are the Republican Party.

Let me just say that it is curious and not in any way comforting to have lived long enough to see mediocrity overtake mastery in the affairs of men (I don’t mean Letterman, Sam). To learn that there are actually those with university degrees out there who have convinced themselves that instant pudding and instand Presidents are the real thing. I’ve had quite enough of this “Nouveau” world order, thanks.

Things are so convoluted that I may as well end the evening with the Letterman Leacery update:

The man who blackmailed him was the lover of a woman who had formerly had an affair with Letterman. She had gone on vacations with Letterman, his wife and son. Dave’s wife thought she was just a good friend.

She told Haldeman it was all over with Letterman but then he found her and Letterman making out in a car parked in their driveway.

Letterman needs be put in some kind of therapy program – for the rest of his life.

Can we actually impeach Barack Hussein Obama? Should we impeach Barack Hussein Obama?

To borrow a phrase from the “anointed-one,” … “yes we can.”

But before going on, we really need to address the often misunderstood subject of what exactly constitutes an impeachable offense, in order to illustrate that Barack Hussein Obama’s actions are grave enough to warrant impeachment.

Former President Gerald Ford, while serving in the House of Representatives, said an impeachable offense was, “whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history.”

Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution reads: “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

The key phrase here is “high crimes and misdemeanors,” a concept in English Common Law that was well-known to our Founding Fathers but is grossly misunderstood in this day and age.

“High crimes and misdemeanors” essentially means bad behavior.

Here’s a passage from C-Span.org which succinctly and beautifully summarizes the historical significance surrounding the inclusion of the term “high crimes and misdemeanors” in the Constitution:

“‘High crimes and misdemeanors’ entered the text of the Constitution due to George Mason and James Madison. Mason had argued that the reasons given for impeachment – treason and bribery – were not enough. He worried that other ‘great and dangerous offenses’ might not be covered… so Mason then proposed ‘high crimes and misdemeanors,’ a phrase well-known in English common law. In 18th century language, a ‘misdemeanor’ meant ‘mis-demeanor,’ or bad behavior.”

In other words, “high crimes and misdemeanors” does not refer to a criminal act (as some would lead you to believe… at least our Founding Fathers did not believe so) and the Founders fully intended to allow for the removal of the President for actions which were… well… simply put… egregious… grossly incompetence… grossly negligence… outright distasteful… or, in the case of Barack Hussein Obama, actions which clearly show “malevolence toward this country, which is unabated.”

And make no mistake, for those who mistakenly hold the illusion that impeaching Barack Hussein Obama would be a simple matter of “playing politics,” the Founders fully intended that the impeachment of a sitting President be a political act.

As C-Span.org notes:

“The Congress decides the definition [of impeachable offenses]: by majority vote in the House for impeachment, and by 2/3 vote in the Senate for conviction. The Framers of the Constitution deliberately put impeachment into the hands of the legislative branch rather than the judicial branch, thus transforming it from strictly a matter of legal definition to a matter of political judgment. Then Representative Gerald Ford put it into practical perspective in 1970, when he said an impeachable offense is ‘whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history.'”

The Obama Administration exemplifies maladministration. It qualifies as the poster-child for bad behavior.

Obama and those around him are ravaging this great country and adding a sorry chapter to a noble history.

Impeachment, as written in the Constitution, was tailor-made for Barack Hussein Obama and our Founders placed it in our Constitution for such a time as this.

It could be easily argued that we have a duty to impeach Barack Hussein Obama.

Of course, our elected officials won’t have the back-bone to go it alone. That’s where you come in.

Help us spread the word far-and-wide and our elected officials will come to know that the impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama is the will of the American people and that if they ignore the will of the people. they do so at their own political peril.

The question is not whether we should impeach Barack Hussein Obama. Rather, the question is, can we impeach Barack Hussein Obama before it is too late?

This is a sign of the times. We have watched the moral fiber of our Country deteriorate over the last 20 or 25 years to a point where the American People have become decensitized to what is right and what is wrong. Remember the chant of the 60’s? ” If it feels good, do it” . Well here we are and now we are not just fighting for our Freedoms but for the minds and hearts of the American People. How can so many well meaning Americans be so very misguided?

The longer Jennings is the School Czar, the worse it is for the left… this is not going away …that the left justifies a pedophile as school czar, the more everyone will understand their sellout of all children for political gain

they do not understand the error they make… and it is corrupting the image of them and their master… Obutthole

I was talking with the plumber the other day when the audible sound of a low fart was heard followed by delivery of what could have been an SBD (a weapon of mass destruction). The plumber looked at me and I said: Isn’t that funny – it’s the dog. I missed my cue so he said: “Think you had better let the dog out.” Just a teder moment with the plumber and me and SamHenry.

I really do not understand why certain people go to the Western world and want to change things which is part of that country’s right to a free and democratic society. I am British and married to an Iranian. I got married in Iran and lived there for most of my life until we finally managed to leave Iran, the country we love and respect very much, in 1985 and come to England. The reason: it was very suffocating and repressive and depressive. We were not practicing Muslim and if we were, we would have stayed put or gone to another Islamic country eg Saudi Arabia, the birth place of Islam. I believe Islam is not a religion anymore for some people but sadly has become a business. There are people out there including miss Dalia Moghahed who are making money by writing books, giving seminars and just preaching about what they think is right and yes she wears her scarf so she can say whatever she wants and nobody, at least in the political correctness of the West, and say but I am a good Moslem I wear my Hijab(whatever that means!!), she would be subject to 50 lashes if she were in her country of origin, Egypt. Honestly if you see the appreance of some of these young Moslem girls! in UK: With their fancy head coverings and 3 inch makeup and red lipstick and Cleopatra eyemakeup, if they wer in Iran they would have been arrested and somehow disfigured!!
The fact of the matter is, and it is really quite simple: if you don’t like the West then don’t come and go back to a country that you feel make you more comfortable. We need to stop these people who are using religion as a mean of making money and building hatered amongst others. If miss Moghahed is really concered then she needs to go and use her education and educate people out of ignorance so men and women can live side by side with mutual respect and harmony, she could also arrange an anti fudamantalist or Islamist demonstration to prove her point, IF SHE DARES.