On Thursday, September 03 2015, Philippe Waroquiers wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 10:37 +0100, Yao Qi wrote:
>> We don't have to get printf involved in the test, because some targets
>> may don't have printf at all.
> Ok, effectively, without printf, the test will then run on these
> targets.
>
> Find below the new version of the patch.
> All your comments should be handled.
>
> The fix itself still need to be reviewed.
>
> Thanks for your review
>
> Any comment on the fix ? Ok to commit ?
Thanks, Philippe.
I wanted to reply to this earlier, sorry. I looked at your proposed
patch, and it looks fine for me. It makes sense, and is "simple" enough
that nothing seemed out of place.
I am not a maintainer for this part of the code, but I think it can be
safely approved.
Thanks again,
--
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/