Disclaimer

Images

We do our best to use images that are open source. If you feel
we have used an image of yours inappropriately please let us
know and we will fix it.

Accuracy

Our writing can be punchy but we do our level best to ensure
the material is accurate. If you believe we have made a mistake,
please let us know.

Visits

If you are planning to see an artwork, please keep in mind that
while the art we cover is held in permanent collections, pieces
are sometimes removed from display for renovation or traveling
exhibitions.

Disclaimer

Images

We do our best to use images that are open source. If you feel
we have used an image of yours inappropriately please let us
know and we will fix it.

Accuracy

Our writing can be punchy but we do our level best to ensure
the material is accurate. If you believe we have made a mistake,
please let us know.

Visits

If you are planning to see an artwork, please keep in mind that
while the art we cover is held in permanent collections, pieces
are sometimes removed from display for renovation or traveling
exhibitions.

Sartle site makes heavy use of JavaScript and to work properly, it requires JavaScript to be enabled. Either you have JavaScript disabled or your browser does not support JavaScript. If you can enable it in your browser preferences, you will have a better experience.

"Give 'em the old razzle dazzle" took on a whole new meaning in World War I.

At the start of the 20th century, just before the war, a man named Norman Wilkinson convinced the English navy to take ship camouflage to the next level. Rather than aim for invisibility, he sought to confuse the opposing armies to greatly hinder their ability to aim and hit the ships.

To convince the English navy to give dazzle camouflage a try, Wilkinson made a model dazzle ship and challenged King George V to predict it’s direction. When the king failed to do so correctly, he grew agitated. Wilkinson presented the same challenge to a high ranking official in the English Navy who then also failed the challenge. The official responded with “How the hell do you expect me to predict the course of a ***** thing all painted up like that?”, successfully proving Wilkinson’s point.

Our artist Wadsworth wasn’t involved in the conception of dazzle camouflage, but has since become one of the most recognizable names associated with the project. This painting in particular, his first after the war ended, saw a great surge in popularity for the artist. Wadsworth worked as one of the camoufleurs tasked with designing and painting the geometric patterns for English naval ships. When the ships docked, as portrayed here in the painting, they caught the attention of all those around, dazzling them as it were.

The idea behind dazzle camouflage was to use conflicting geometric shapes and vertical lines of black and white to make the path of the ship indecipherable to enemy attackers. If an opposing submarine couldn’t determine where the ship was headed, they couldn’t correctly target their torpedoes and the beautiful ships would sail on unharmed.

Overall, the dazzle camouflage project was deemed a success — especially in the eyes of the public. However, research conducted in the years following the war argue that its supposed success may be attributed to other developments in the English navy. Nonetheless, the idea of dazzle camouflage fascinated the public at the time. So when statistics were released that showed ship sinkings had decreased since the ships were bedazzled, the press ran with it. Dazzle camouflage became so popular that it made its way into fashion, with fabrics recreating the same patterns. The resulting popularity led Picasso to boast that dazzle camouflage was inspired by the cubist movement.

While the ship sinkings had decreased, reports comparing how often the ships with dazzle camouflage and the ships without were hit or sunk showed the difference was minimal. There wasn’t much to support that dazzle camouflage worked as intended or as well as the press claimed. But, it was said that the morale of the crews on the dazzle ships was much higher than those without because they felt so confident in the project and the protection the paint gave them.

Dazzle camouflage inspired further camouflage development in World War II, with artists such as Ellsworth Kelly participating as camoufleurs. His painting Citéin particular feels like it could have adorned a pretty awesome dazzle ship.

Dazzle-ships in Drydock at Liverpool is a 1919 painting by the English artist Edward Wadsworth. It is one of Wadsworth's most famous paintings.

Creation

Wadsworth had been involved with Vorticism, an abstract art movement led by Wyndham Lewis, before he was employed to design dazzle camouflage for ships during World War I. This experience forms the background for Dazzle-ships in Drydock at Liverpool.

Comments (3)

This piece of artwork caught my attention right away from the use of all the different lines. This image is a ship at dock. It looks as if there is a little factory in the background too. There is a lot of different movement going on in this image. This can sometimes be overwhelming in different pieces but the artist of this image did a great job of displaying the ship. You can easily point out and clearly see the focus in this piece. This is definitely a unique piece of art because of the things that the author portrays and the intentions behind it.

This artwork's use of hard black and white lines to form an abstract ship interests me. I don't know how I know it, but this is a ship. Though it is a seeming mess of random lines it is still quite clear that the artist's intention was to create a ship out through shapes rather than brushstrokes.