The paper, as
many
others
have in recent weeks, called Trump "ill-equipped to be
commander in chief," saying he "traffics in prejudice," "isn't
leveling with the American people," and is "a serial liar."

"Did you ever imagine that a presidential candidate would discuss
the size of his genitalia during a nationally televised
Republican debate? Neither did we," the editorial board wrote.
"Did you ever imagine a presidential candidate, one who avoided
service in the military, would criticize Gold Star parents who
lost a son in Iraq? Neither did we," it added.

But the paper noted that its Trump takedown was not an
endorsement for Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee. The
eight-person
editorial board was split on giving Clinton its support.