What do you think will happen to the NEO course if a military conflict between the United States and North Korea begins?There are forecasts that all Asian markets strongly collapse..

Who knows, but my guess is that crypto remains strong. It seems the more chaos there is in the world, the more Bitcoin and other strong coins will be seen as a place of stability. Fiat can be printed for the cost of paper and is unlimited unlike crypto. If NEO's only market is China, that is still extremely bullish IMO.

Hope they will extend it once everything is working, but China is already a bit market of course

NEO going to stay at #5 on Coinmarket cap very soon ... good news for community

Already is Top 5 now at more than 51 USD

And Top 3 for 24h volume! Where it will stop?? Moon I guess

It's amazing how NEO has taken off, I do thing it will go to 2M satoshi before it goes into a more stable period. Fact to a fact is that the Microsoft connection has given me a lot more trust then I already had. At this point I will keep my NEO and GAS. When both are high enough I will start selling bits and bytes.

Is this the same coin with 50 million pre-mined? so half the supply is yours just as well as the other half being sold in what ICO? how many alt coins have you copied into this one? I want to know what people using this NEO for, just it doesn't make any sense, there is no decentralization here.We are unable to get some NEO without paying for them, that's not a crypto currency.

Is this the same coin with 50 million pre-mined? so half the supply is yours just as well as the other half being sold in what ICO? how many alt coins have you copied into this one? I want to know what people using this NEO for, just it doesn't make any sense, there is no decentralization here.We are unable to get some NEO without paying for them, that's not a crypto currency.

NEO has committed to using those funds for the benefit of NEO. To create future connections, pay developers, marketing and so on.

Look at the statistics to understand how much money need to be injected everyday in order to keep the current price stable ? I am already out too time and made come back but this time. I am hanging around to make entry again, when price will really be reasonable. It is huge success where it has reached but I am afraid market will loose significant share in short term.

Quote from: onetwo12 on June 27, 2017, 05:50:12 AMQuote from: onetwo12 on June 22, 2017, 09:49:08 AMQuote from: Ashara on June 21, 2017, 12:57:12 PMQuote from: onetwo12 on June 21, 2017, 06:45:33 AMQuote from: Ashara on June 21, 2017, 04:12:34 AMQuote from: onetwo12 on June 21, 2017, 03:48:22 AMBFT Consensus can not support a large scale nodes, you are wrong.

it can never be decentralized like bitcoin and Ethereum..

it's more like a centralized network.

then why you buy some data from a centralized network?

i am not trying to fuds, but that's the truth of science.

Even the first sentence of the ANS whitepaper makes clear that it is decentralised. The current layout supports a theoretical maximum of 10000 Bookkeeping nodes. Every ANS represents a vote. We can make decisions about the system itself just fine. Enjoy your Bitcoin and Ethereum. Bitcoin will probably use as much electricity as Denmark by 2020 and both Ethereum and Bitcoin cannot handle truly vast transaction flows. Also enjoy your forking potential and the One Man bookkeeping limitations that both systems provide. You stick to Bitcoin and Ethereum and I will stick to ANS and we will see what is more successful in the long run. How is that for a deal?

Are Bitcoin and Ethereum more decentralised? Yes, but that comes at the cost of vast energy expense, inefficiency and speed. A single bitcoin transaction uses as much energy as almost four households use for a day. You might call that great. I call that bad design. I am fine with agreeing to disagree. The markets will speak for themselves.

everyone just saying they are better than BTC.

yes, you are right, you can have a lot SPV wallet or so called bookkeeping nodes,

but you do not have the right to be a full nodes, you just listen what the validation nodes tell you.

and you do not even know what you are buying, time will tell who is right.

Bitcoin is bitcoin, Ethereum will be Ethereum.

You obviously did not notice that at https://www.antshares.org/ the number of FULL NODES at this point is 417. I think the only requirement to become a full node is having 10,000 ANS and running the proper Linux system whilst meeting all technical specifications. Everyone else who runs it is in effect a light node. If you read the network protocol (https://github.com/AntShares/AntShares/wiki/Network-Protocol), you will see that ANS holders can vote on validator candidates and it can be increased to a maximum of 1024. Validator candidates can be accepted, rejected or revoked. This is a continuous process. Let's give another example: Does a Presidential candidate run the country? No, it is a candidate who can be elected by others. That is the same with the validator candidates you are referring to. If you noticed carefully, 7 are effective and 1 was revoked. This appears to be an old list for selecting candidates. The number that matters is the 417 FULL NODES. This number is increasingly rapidly in the last few days. Contrary to Bitcoin ANS holders get to vote on which parties they trust to run the system.

no, i think the things matter is validation nodes, if this 8 validations node went down, this system worth nothing

that's the reason why i say this will never become a currency.. just a hype.