Well, I wouldn't read much into the decision of allowing Tim Brown to leave and keeping Jerry. I mean, the Tim Brown that left the Raiders was a f*cking disaster. His legs had given up and was unable to perform at NFL level. Take that from a Bucs fan... I still remember the "Tim Brown and Charlie Garner as Bucs experience".

JOEL wrote:russell doing nothing makes him a way better than smith based on what smith has done

Uhhh, no. You've got to be freaking kidding me. Russell is about to enter his 2nd season. Smith has been here for 3 years. Seattle is probably the toughest place to play and yet last year, Smith went into Seattle despite the harsh weather conditions and in the second half, won the game. He evaded a sack and through a TD pass to Gore and then faked a run play to Gore and ran it with all the Seahawks defense going after Gore and Smith going untouched for a 15-yd TD run. Has Russell ever shown maturity? No. What about this past disastrous season? The first game against the Cardinals on a 4th down and long, Smith scrambled out of the pocket, evaded tacklers, and got the first down which ultimately led to the winning score.

sfsfsfgiants wrote:Give him some time. He will turn into the same worthless piece of crap as Smith. Russell is an athlete, not a quarterback.

so let me get this correct in your mind ( this will help to see the worth of entertaining your comments) a player who is a proven loser "SMITH"
is better than a player who is just an athlete"RUSSELL"
smith proven loser russell (in your words) who hasnt done anything...

sfsfsfgiants wrote:Both are utter losers. Neither will make it as a legit NFL player. Right now, though, I would take Smith over Russell, though not by much. Both suck. It is just a matter of Smith sucking less.

thinking you didnt answer the question but that is typical..
your saying smith is better(a proven loser) than russell (who hasnt done anything)?