Why Liberals Are Modern NAZIS: The Death Of Thought And The Demise Of America Through Mindless Emotional ‘Liberal’ Outrage

As we speak, I am watching riots. I am watching burnings and lootings of businesses, I am watching public access points being seized and blockaded, I am watching rabid calls to violence. All in the name of “demonstrations.”

I am watching what horrified sadly-too-few Germans in the 1930s is what I’m watching.

I ask myself, how many conservative riots have there been? The answer, of course, is zero.

Is it just black people who riot? I mean, aside from Ferguson, we can go back to lots of other black riots, such as Watts in ’68 and so on.

But I ask myself, how many conservative black people rioted? And the answer, of course, is zero.

This behavior isn’t about race. It’s about a culture that has been led astray by means of an utterly depraved worldview commonly known as “liberalism.”

Classical liberalism is a political philosophy and ideology belonging to liberalismin which primary emphasis is placed on securing the freedom of the individual by limiting the power of the government.

By the classical definition of liberalism, I am a liberal. I want more freedom for individuals because individuals are held accountable for their actions and therefore I want a limited government that emphasizes that liberty and freedom and corresponding duty of the individual. Barack Obama, Nazi Pelosi (couldn’t resist) and Harry Reid are fascists bent on expanding government until individuals are free to do what government wants to force them to do by a massive system of laws, policies, rules, regulations, bureaucracies, and of course out-of-control executive orders by a now self-professed king or emperor who has fundamentally abrogated the Constitution and tossed out the Separation of Powers.

True liberals want individual personal liberty and individual personal responsibility that must correspond with individual personal liberty. Because rights without duties is moral chaos. And therefore true want limited government, they want a laissez-faire free market economy, they want the rule of law and they want private property rights. The “liberals” of today are joyfully running roughshod over all of these values as they seek to impose bigger and bigger and more and more powerful – and more totalitarian and more fascist – government.

What’s the mechanism of the left? We’re watching it all around us today as liberals riot and burn and loot over a police officer who shot a man who had just strongarm robbed a store and brutally shoved aside its owner ON VIDEO, walked down the middle of a large avenue as if he owned it, physically assaulted a police officer in his car, punched that officer in the face, tried to take the officer’s weapon from him, and then ultimately charged the officer with murderous rage as the officer fired repeatedly at him. That’s what the witness testimony – of at least half a dozen black people, fwiw – says and that’s what the forensic evidence says.

That was, of course, irrelevant to the left, who raced off to burn and loot and riot the moment they heard there would be no indictment of the police officer without bothering to hear the massive evidence justifying that jury decision (which included three black people). Some examples of the eyewitness testimony:

“Mike Brown continuously came forward in the charging motion and at some point, at one point he started to slow down and he came to a stop. And when he stopped, that’s when the officer ceased fire and when he ceased fired, Mike Brown started to charge once more at him. When he charged once more, the officer returned fire with, I would say, give an estimate of three to four shots. And that’s when Mike Brown finally collapsed right about even with this driveway.” Read original – Grand Jury Volume 6 , page 167

“Then Michael turned around and started charging towards the officer and the officer still yelling stop. He did have his firearm drawn, but he was yelling stop, stop, stop. He didn’t so he started shooting him.” Read original – Grand Jury Volume 18, page 27

“I thought he was trying to charge him at first because the only thing I kept saying was is he crazy? Why don’t he just stop instead of running because if somebody is pulling a gun on you, first thing I would think is to drop down on the ground and not try to look like I’m going to attack ’em, but that was my opinion. ” Read original – Grand Jury Volume 11, page 181

“Um, I guess it was like he stopped and he turned around like this, and then he started moving towards the officer and kind of looked like he picked up a little bit of speed, and then he started going down.” Read original – Grand Jury Volume 23, page 137

And once an inaccuracy becomes part of a person’s recollection, it’s almost impossible to dislodge. Even when that person, Tversky wrote, is challenged with direct information that refutes his or her own memory. “Once witnesses state facts in a particular way or identify a particular person as the perpetrator, they are unwilling or even unable — due to the reconstruction of their memory — to reconsider their initial understanding.”

This appears to be what occurred in the Darren Wilson investigation. Even when authorities challenged witnesses with forensic evidence — which McCulloch said “does not change because of public pressure or personal agenda” — they didn’t back down. He gave as an example witnesses who said they saw Wilson pump bullets into Brown’s back, sticking with their story even after autopsies demonstrated that no bullets entered Brown’s back.

They “stood by original statements even through their statements were completely discredited by the physical evidence,” McCulloch said.

Of the 20 or so eyewitnesses who appeared before the grand jury, most of those who spoke to the issue said they believed Mr. Brown had his hands up. But some accounts were clearly not credible and were recanted under interrogation. And of the credible witnesses whose stories were largely consistent, many were at odds with one another.

The people who claimed that Michael Brown surrendered and had his hands up and was saying “Don’t shoot” but that Officer Wilson shot him in the back, etc, were directly refuted by the physical evidence. Many of them actually DID recant their previous inflammatory testimony when placed under oath.

There was NO WAY IN HELL A JURY WAS EVER GOING TO CONVICT OFFICER DARREN WILSON. Just no freaking way. Juries are loathe to convict or even indict police officers because they are loathe to second-guess men and women who they know have a difficult job which is to protect people and protect society from violent predators.

“The notion that white cops are out there just killing black people is ridiculous. It’s flat-out ridiculous,” he said. “I challenge any black person to make that point. Cops are absolutely awesome. They’re the only thing in the ghetto (separating this place) from this place being the wild, wild west.”

This isn’t about race. It is easy to document that there are cases of black officers who shot and killed white suspects who were not indicted for their actions, as well.

The worst thing on earth that could happen to black communities is if police officers – stung by leftist hate and violence – stopped patrolling black neighborhoods and allowed the people they are being hated for killing to run the streets.

Those are simply facts.

But the facts simply didn’t matter to the left.

The following – detailing the story of a “rape” and the brutally dismissive culture that refused to respond to the terrible and shocking crime – is manifestly descriptive of the mindset of the left today.

Last month, Rolling Stone published a story titled “A Rape on Campus” by Sabrina Rubin Erdely, which described a brutal gang rape of a woman named Jackie at a University of Virginia fraternity house; the university’s failure to respond to this alleged assault – and the school’s troubling history of indifference to many other instances of alleged sexual assaults. The story generated worldwide headlines and much soul-searching at UVA. University president Teresa Sullivan promised a full investigation and also to examine the way the school responds to sexual assault allegations.

Because of the sensitive nature of Jackie’s story, we decided to honor her request not to contact the man she claimed orchestrated the attack on her nor any of the men she claimed participated in the attack for fear of retaliation against her. In the months Erdely spent reporting the story, Jackie neither said nor did anything that made Erdely, or Rolling Stone’s editors and fact-checkers, question Jackie’s credibility. Her friends and rape activists on campus strongly supported Jackie’s account. She had spoken of the assault in campus forums. We reached out to both the local branch and the national leadership of the fraternity where Jackie said she was attacked. They responded that they couldn’t confirm or deny her story but had concerns about the evidence.

In the face of new information, there now appear to be discrepancies in Jackie’s account, and we have come to the conclusion that our trust in her was misplaced. We were trying to be sensitive to the unfair shame and humiliation many women feel after a sexual assault and now regret the decision to not contact the alleged assaulters to get their account. We are taking this seriously and apologize to anyone who was affected by the story.

What we find is that the Rolling Stone “reporter” actually went “rape-shopping” to find the perfect story to fit her pre-conceived narrative. This wasn’t “journalism,” it was LIBERAL journalism, which is another term for “Nazi propaganda.” Rolling Stone didn’t even bother to do interviews with anyone who could have told the truth or reported the actual facts because the last thing liberalism cares about is the truth or the facts. Liberals who as postmodernists mock the reality of truth the exact same way that Pontius Pilate mocked the existence of truth as he was turning away from the very embodiment of it and sentencing Him to death somehow hypocritically and dishonestly believe that they are the sole arbiters of the very thing that they deny. And so they alone are in sole possession of “the truth” and they act accordingly.

The fraternity that was dishonestly slandered by this story was vandalized, its members threatened and ostracized. Mobs of liberals chanted outside, “Burn this place down” over and over while they huddled inside. As the University of Virginia, reacting to the mobs and responding to the dictates of liberalism, issued a moratorium that has STILL not been lifted essentially shutting down the frat from the right to do business.

There was a “rape,” all right. Those young men and that fraternity were raped by progressive liberalism, which is fascism.

This story will soon be purged from the Rolling Stone database, purged from all the leftist hate sites that used it as “evidence” of their viciousness, and it will be like it never happened.

But the fascist feminist PC policies that the fascist PC Nazi university administrators and faculty implemented as a direct result of this lie will go on forever.

Liberalism is a lie made possible by lies. Liberalism is pathologically dishonest policies that are implemented as a result of pathologically dishonest lies from leftist liars. The issues that liberals gin up demonic hate in order to impose their fascist tyranny change as the same people employ the same tactic again and again and again. But the dishonesty and hypocrisy are always there.

Column The University of Virginia rape Rorschach test
SHARELINE
▼Those looking closely at the UVA rape story represent a cross-section of the political spectrum
▼Questioning the UVA rape story will almost certainly get us dismissed as traitors to the sisterhood
December 3, 2014, 6:02 PM

Are you a “UVA truther”? In other words, are you an abhorrent, woman-hating, “pro-rape Republican”?.

Or are you a “feminazi” guided by “rape crisis fantasy” and driven by emotions over logic?

Those are among the epithets being hurled in the court of public opinion over the explosive allegations of a staggeringly awful rape at the University of Virginia published by Rolling Stone. In the story, a woman identified as Jackie tells of being led into a dark bedroom at a fraternity party, where seven men, with assistance from two others, raped her over a three-hour period.

The 9,000-word article by Sabrina Rubin Erdely set off a tidal wave of horror and outrage. Soon enough, though, came a trickle of inquiries into Erdely’s reporting methods, chiefly the question of why she hadn’t talked to the alleged perpetrators.

And since many of the first askers of that question had conservative or libertarian leanings, the feminist backlash was almost immediate. When The Times’ resident conservative columnist, Jonah Goldberg, examined holes in the story, his usual critics dismissed his conjectures as mere right-wing pushback against political correctness.

When a Reason magazine writer penned an evenhanded article on the case, indicating that he initially believed Jackie’s story, the liberal site Talking Points Memo nonetheless reacted with the headline “Libertarian Magazine Wonders if UVA Rolling Stone Rape Was a ‘Hoax.’” The lively feminist blog Jezebel did TPM one better: “‘Is the UVA Rape Story a Giant Hoax?’ Asks Idiot.”

Such snark is eye-catching and click-generating, but in this case, it’s not just conservatives and purported anti-feminists who are asking questions. In the New Republic, Judith Shulevitz eventually landed on an insight from lawyer and feminist social critic Wendy Kaminer, who told her, “I’d guess that the story is neither entirely fabricated nor entirely true and, in any case, compels a real investigation by investigators with no stake in their findings.”

In an interview on Slate’s feminist-leaning Double X podcast, writer Hanna Rosin confronted Erdely with questions similar to the ones her more libertarian counterparts had raised, with ambiguous results. On Wednesday, after further reporting including talking to several of Jackie’s friends, Rosin and Slate senior editor Allison Benedikt posted an article critical of both Erdely and Rolling Stone.

In the “us versus them” paradigm that so often colors discussions around gender and sexual assault , such a response might be surprising coming from a feminist. After all, it’s supposed to be the Jonah Goldbergs of the world (“idiots,” according to Jezebel) who would dare to question a woman’s account of a rape, or another woman’s account of her account. But the journalists and others who are now looking closely at this story represent a cross-section of the political spectrum.

Rosin and Shulevitz are hardly conservatives. Neither am I. Yet questioning the story will almost certainly get us dismissed as traitors to the sisterhood. If you don’t believe me, wait a few seconds for the rants from “activists” who will insist that asking rational, even obvious questions makes you a rape apologist, someone who dismisses all women’s stories or won’t admit that campus sexual assault is a problem.

Such attacks are not only absurd, they’re also insulting. They’re insulting to journalists, who know the importance of holding themselves and their sources accountable to the truth. Worse, they’re insulting to survivors of sexual assault whose stories should be told without obfuscation and equivocation. It’s that kind of murkiness, after all, that contributes to an undercurrent of suspicion of victims — an undercurrent that, unfortunately, continues to dominate many conversations about rape.

Inquiries into this story should not devolve into battles between truthers and believers, the “idiots” and the “real feminists.” Believe it or not, conservatives don’t have a monopoly on skepticism, just as liberals and feminists aren’t the only ones inclined to believe a story like Jackie’s. If those of us asking questions turn out to be idiots for not believing the story on its face, fair enough.

But last I checked, nothing cures idiocy like asking questions.

Which, ultimately, is another way of saying there’s no cure for modern so-called “liberalism.” Because to be a “liberal” today is to be a rabid fool who spits out hate and riots over any suggestion of a question.

They are modern Nazis by a euphemistic new name. But don’t think the tactics of Hitler and Goebbels aren’t alive and well in their demon-possessed souls.

You can’t reason with liberals because their knee-jerk reaction is invariably to demonize your motives – which are beyond anyone’s ability to prove or disprove – and thus demonize everything you think, say or do because you are a “racist” or a “homophobe” or a “misogynist” or a “misanthropist” or whatever label they want to hate you with. It’s an element of their theology that you are evil and therefore you must obviously be evil. And good luck talking to the rabid left.

I think of Ferguson. I remember the left decrying the Gestapo tactics of the police as they showed up in force to prevent rioting. All the subsequent rioting, of course, was clearly the result of the police for showing up with armored cars to prevent rioting. So of course after the grand jury verdict was read, the police weren’t out in force. And of course there was rioting. And the same cockroach leftists who had decried the police presence now proceeded to blame the lack of police presence for the next wave of rioting and burning and looting.

If the grand jury had decided to indict Officer Darren Wilson, do you know how many conservatives would have rioted? ZERO. And that’s because conservatives are decent and liberals are NAZIS and the worst kind of ugliness is always in their hearts 24/7, just waiting to erupt in another riot like all the other riots they’ve called “demonstrations.”

Because to be a liberal is to be morally insane and therefore to be insane in every other way, as well.

Meghan Daum is pointing out that a few liberals like herself were opposed to this fascist liberal mindset. And I actually take my hat off to Meghan Daum for her courage. But the fact of the matter is that there are VERY few like her in the worldview of liberalism. And she herself described the avalanche-of-hate fascist mindset that confronted anyone who tried in any way, shape or form to question this now-openly-revealed lie.

I don’t care what the subject is: ObamaCare? Yeah, everything that Obama and his rabid supporters said turned out not only to be untrue, but outright lies advanced to deceive the American people who were deemed “stupid.”

You can read transcripts of some of what ObamaCare architect – BECAUSE YES, HE WAS – here.

But you go back and see the hateful charges from Nazis – I mean “liberals” – who accused us of everything from racism (because to not adore absolutely everything about Barack Obama and his entire worldview meant you clearly had to be a racist) to hatred of the poor and literally a desire to kill them.

That “law” was passed by fascists using fascist methodology, pure and simple. It was passed by those who believe that the American people are stupid – and not deserving of individual liberty and not capable of individual personal responsibility – and therefore these sheep must be steered and guided if not herded by their Utopian masters.

We can talk about Obama’s fascist and tyrannous executive power grab over illegal immigration the same way.

19 Responses to “Why Liberals Are Modern NAZIS: The Death Of Thought And The Demise Of America Through Mindless Emotional ‘Liberal’ Outrage”

“Liberalism is a lie made possible by lies. Liberalism is pathologically dishonest policies that are implemented as a result of pathologically dishonest lies from leftist liars. The issues that liberals gin up demonic hate in order to impose their fascist tyranny change as the same people employ the same tactic again and again and again. But the dishonesty and hypocrisy are always there.”

So nicely said that it deserved to be in boldface. And as you wrote elsewhere, liberals want to believe lies. Truth is not as exalted to Libs as it is to Conservatives.

To put it in scholarly, technical terminology, liberals are postmodernists and conservatives are foundationalists.

Liberals deny the reality of objective truth; conservatives embrace that there is genuine knowledge based on the reality of existence of ultimate truth. That ultimate truth comes from a Creator, whom liberals have entirely abandoned.

As I write, Gruber is twisting himself into a pretzel to make sure that the lie that is the heart of ObamaCare will continue to dishonestly beat.

Gruber is in an interesting position right now. He doesn’t want to talk about his salary (he got MILLIONS for his role in ObamaCare) because his statements were either true or false. If they were true then ObamaCare ought to be finished. If they were false it would constitute criminal fraud on Gruber’s part.

I’m trying to remember if I wrote anything about gas prices in this article. Oh, that’s right, I DIDN’T. So here you are, dragging your fallacy of non sequitur wherever you go.

Unlike liberals who predicted things that turned out to be utterly false about terrorism, foreign policy, Russia, Iran, China, ObamaCare, the stimulus, the economy, or just damn near anything – and then they don’t want to talk about it any more, I am posting your comment because one conservative has more integrity than every liberal on earth combined. Even though your rant has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with the article in question but you are dishonestly pretending there is.

I first point out that OBAMA’S SECOND TERM ISN’T OVER YET. And I bet if gas prices spike you won’t be back here to admit you were wrong. Because you’re a liberal and therefore devoid of honor or personal responsibility.

For the record, when you look at the high gas prices seen under Bush that you liberals went so damn batpoop over, THEY OCURRED VERY NEAR THE END OF HIS PRESIDENCY.

Too bad you don’t have the integrity to wait before you claim you were right and what happened to Bush cannot possibly happen to Obama.

I believe that if Obama is reelected, we will see gas prices go up to the $9 to $10 a gallon that Obama’s handpicked energy secretary is on the record desiring.

Again, is Obama’s second term over? It seems to me he’s got a full half of it plus yet to go. But apparently you – who worships Obama as your messiah – trust in your godless heart that Obama will heal the planet and lower the level of the oceans.

Apparently you DON’T believe what Obama himself said about energy/oil prices. Because Obama’s predictions were precisely in line with mine, weren’t they?

Now, what has made oil prices go down so much. Obama? NOT. Try “fracking” which has enabled oil companies to massively expand oil production.

The fact is that Obama has done NOTHING to lower the cost of oil, and in fact has tried to prevent oil from being more plentiful and therefore cheaper. So what are you but a hypocrite for taking credit for it?

The other big reason oil has tanked is because investors believe a worldwide stall is coming:

Now do you, Obama worshiper, give your messiah praise and glory for destroying the planet’s economy, or are you just worthless fool who ascribes praise and glory for everything that makes your messiah look good but blaming Bush for everything that looks bad?

Now lastly, here’s one more thing. Under which president have gas prices averaged higher?

I’ve got two charts that together cover both presidencies to this point:

So based on those charts, do the math. Bush’s price averaged about $2.18 and Obama has averaged $3.15 through 2013. I found a 2014 average thru AAA at $3.253 (http://www.fuelgaugereport.com/). Which would place Obama’s average over six years at $3.16. But all I can say is that Obama has averaged FAR HIGHER at the pump and you have grown accustomed to SKY HIGH PRICES and Obama worship. So you are actually fool enough and frankly demon-possessed enough to insanely believe that Obama has been better at gas prices when reality screams in your fool face to the contrary.

By the way, Chris Boyd, I demand you document the “lies” you accuse me of telling. I have a strong feeling you won’t because you can’t. Which makes YOU the liar.

There are two major factors that influence the price of gasoline. The first is the value of the U.S. dollar. If the value of the dollar increases, then the dollar value of crude oil decreases and vice versa. Crude oil makes up about 65% of the price of gasoline. Lately, the value of the U.S. dollar has increased substantially which has helped push down the price of crude oil which, in turn, has pushed down the price of gasoline. However, please note that the only reason that the value of the “mighty” dollar has increased is only because Europe and Japan have been hell bent on devaluing their currencies which has given the illusion that the dollar is strong. In case of currencies, it is all relative.

The other major factor in all this is the fact that the U.S. has greatly increased its production of crude oil and is once again a major player. Of course, all this is happening on private land, not government owned land and I know how you liberals hate oil. Anyway, the current worldwide supply of oil is extremely high and this, along with the high U.S. dollar, has combined to push down the price of gasoline. Another interesting point here is that the recent emergence of the U.S. as a major supplier of crude has really hurt OPEC, which has actually increased its production in order to further drive down prices in an attempt to put the U.S. suppliers out of business, since most of our recent oil producing sites rely on more expensive fracking and shale technology to extract the oil. I think the line in the sand as far as profitability for shale and many of the frackers is near 70-75 dollars a barrel; as of today, oil is below 60.

Anyway, I tell you this so you don’t go ahead and try to give the scumbag Obama credit for low gasoline prices. The low gas prices we have enjoying lately have nothing to do with him or his policies. Actually, Obama would much rather have sky high energy prices so he could push his green agenda and exert even more fascist government control over this nation. Also, I believe he wants higher energy prices to simply punish America. He absolutely hates this country and is in the process of fundamentally transforming it into the image of the beast. He has fooled many liberals into thinking that he is doing good when, in fact, he is masterminding the complete opposite. Liberalism is a mental disease and there is little hope or a cure for those stricken with it.

These low prices will not last too long, though. Sooner or later, the value of the dollar will inevitably collapse sending crude oil and gasoline prices into the stratosphere. Don’t ask me to make any predictions as to how or when. The collapse of the dollar will, in part, be a result of the massive debt that Obama has incurred on America and adding millions of illegals to the welfare roles. This is by design and part of the Cloward-Piven strategy.

Yes, it may appear that Michael was wrong about his prediction of 9 dollar gas. Making economic predictions is a very difficult endeavor and many even in the financial industry fail at it. Actually, most will consider you a guru if even half your forecasts are accurate or true. I trade crude oil futures for a living and many traders like myself a couple of years ago would never have guessed prices would be this low now. Also, I must mention again that high energy prices are what Obama desires, so what Michael stated was not really ridiculous at all.

As far as truth and lies, I would say that this blog is saturated with the truth and that is why I come here almost every day. Michael has done a most excellent job at exposing the lies of liberalism and this demonic administration. People like you are mentally deranged and believe lies and there is probably little hope for you. It is sad, but that is what this country is becoming as we accelerate into the last days.

Before I go, there is an interesting dilemma going on here in oil land. The domestic oil and gas production here have been a pretty good boon to the economy and has simultaneously helped lower gas prices which have also helped the economy. But bringing all this oil online may, in a strange irony, doom the very same industry. And then there is OPEC which is trying to further push oil lower to force these domestic companies out of profitability and out of business. If our domestic production coming from shale and some forms of fracking are halted, then oil will go back up and our economy will suffer. Of course, we could just say screw OPEC and just produce and use our very own oil, but I doubt that will happen because of those damn liberals. Anyway, this shall be interesting to see how this all unfolds and it will also be fun trying to predict what will happen, even though most will probably get it wrong.

Ah, just one more thing. Low oil prices are severely hurting Russia. I think that I read one time that oil has to be above 90 for Russia to be prosperous. These low prices today, if they continue, may be the hook in the jaws that sets Russia off in these last days.

Yes, it may appear that Michael was wrong about his prediction of 9 dollar gas

FMC,

First, thank you for entering into this argument, FMC. It’s nice when you can know friends have got your back in a fight when some punk tries to sucker-punch you.

Second, let’s not forget that I’ve got two more years to be right before I’m wrong. And that Bush’s high gas prices occurred in the last 8 months of his last year in office.

Iran gets its ICBM and goes nuclear as Obama has guaranteed WILL happen, you watch and see what happens to gas prices. Whether Iran develops its own ICBM or more likely gets it from an Obama-emboldened Russia, Iran can have nukes two months later.

Anybody who believes Russia would be afraid to provide ICBM technology to Iran is just beyond a fool at this point.

I appreciate FMC for pointing out yet another way we could see $9 PLUS gas – sky high inflation due to a collapsing dollar.

Yes, there are still two years left and, trust me, anything can and probably will happen as the end times phase accelerates. Two years is a long time to have someone like Obama in power. If we make it that long, his policies will be wreaking havoc on this world for years to come and I am absolutely sure we haven’t seen the worst yet.

Satan has access to Obama and you can be sure that he is pushing this turd towards letting Iran become full nuclear. When that does happen, high gas prices might be the least of our worries.

My father recently passed away. I was sad but knowing that he is with the Lord, I am now envious. God, get me out of here and make it quick.

For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so God will bring with Him those who have fallen asleep in Jesus. For this we say to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are alive and remain until the coming of the Lord, will not precede those who have fallen asleep. For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive and remain will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we shall always be with the Lord. Therefore comfort one another with these words. — 1 Thess 4:14-18

FMC,

I am sorrowful that you lost your father. You will miss him greatly, I have no doubt, but you WILL see him alive again. In fact, he will be waiting when the Rapture happens to greet you.

I lost a very dear friend early this year. He was like a father to me. I smile when I think of him because he always had encouragement for me and saw me as God the Father sees me through Jesus. I pray that your memories of your dad bring you such smiles rather than sorrows.

We may endure very hard times before the Blessed Hope of the Rapture as the economy plunges and the world is swept into chaos and madness and misery as it prepares to worship the coming beast and take his mark.

think of your dad in the presence of the Lord, praying for his son’s blessing.

Here’s the thing about liberals: they are creatures of pure feeling of entitlement. They believe they’re always entitled to their own facts just as the feel entitled to the money that other people worked to earn and build.

Here’s the main headline on the main page of USA TODAY on 12.13.14 – “Falling oil drills DOW to worst week in 3 years.”

We had a 315-point collapse of the DOW because investors understand the collapsing oil price is heralding a horrible world economy.

So what does this turd Boyd want to do? Give his messiah praise for the low oil price – even tho Obama has frankly done everything he could to keep oil expensive by making it as costly as he can to extract and bring to market – while blaming Bush for the economy half a damn dozen years after Bush left office. Because he’s a dishonest member of a dishonest species and that’s how dishonest minds malfunction.

Thanks for the kind words. It is never easy losing someone close, especially when it is your father. This has been a very rough year for me, probably one of the worst on record. However, as the beast approaches, I am sure it won’t seem so bad as the days become darker.

The oil market is a complex animal. There are so many factors that can influence it, ranging from basic supply and demand, geopolitical, currency valuations, OPEC, interest rates etc… Although the title of the USA Today article is accurate, it does not tell the whole story. The main reason that oil is being bludgeoned currently is because of the massive supply unleashed on the market relative to demand.

These very low prices are really hammering the energy sector and those stocks associated with it. I think that sector makes up around 20-25% of the S&P 500 and probably has more of an impact on the Dow, although I would have to look that one up.

I have also been hearing that the Fed is thinking about raising interest rates. When they do, we probably have about 8 months to a year before the next big collapse begins. The Fed is incompetent and when they raise rates, they always go too far and burst the bubble that they already created. They are fools, but it almost seems like it is intentional.

I am surrounded by liberals where I live and there is no talking sense to them. They are hopelessly warped in their reasoning and they won’t understand the truth until they are at the Great White Throne Judgment.

The main reason that oil is being bludgeoned currently is because of the massive supply unleashed on the market relative to demand.

FMC,

There’s no question that every good father is a major part of his son’s life. And the closer the relationship, the greater the pain.

Your pain and sense of loss are a measure of how much your dad meant to your life. If he didn’t matter at all, you wouldn’t feel any pain and loss at all.

At the same time, because your father meant so much to you, no one would want you to be able to progress to the point where you can have fullness and joy.

Obviously, there’s a tension, a dichotomy, a paradox, between the above two paragraphs. Yet both are completely true.

It is faith in Christ that resolves the dilemma; because by faith you know you WILL see your dad alive again.

But your assignment for the remainder of your days on this earth is to be able to pursue joy and abundant life until you go to be with your fathers. Grief is a tunnel that we must come out through the other end once again in the light.

As for oil prices, the sentence I pulled from your analysis sums up the situation quite well: fracking has massively increased the supply of oil and OPEC can no longer just shut off the tap and wait for prices to be driven back up. We could say that as much as Obama has tried to serve his oil masters by banning fracking, he failed.

But now in the backdrop of that abundant supply, analysts see a global slowdown – which means a forecast of far lower oil use. Which drives the current price of oil down even more as its expected future value plunges.

The number one reason the price of oil is plunging now is because the market believes a bad economy is coming which will mean everything will slow down ergo sum less oil consumption. The 315-point drop in the DOW is screaming proof of that.

It’s hard to see how ought to make Obama look good.

But then again I’m not a liberal, which means I’m capable of understanding at least a little bit of reality.

I think the ultimate straw that breaks America’s back will be the end of the US dollar as the reserve currency. And even there, Obama’s fingerprints are all over that comeuppance. 1) His insane and evil spending makes America tantamount to a psychotic drug addict to the point where his dealers realize he has to cut his losses as this addict acts in a suicidal manner. They won’t keep loaning us money. 2) Our enemies no longer fear us. 3) Our friends can no longer trust us. 4) We are no longer standing up to evil and tyranny in the world and there is no reason to justify America’s continuing existence with America as alack hole of debt spending that will take the world down with us unless the world cuts its losses.

The Fed came out today stating that they don’t plan on raising interest rates anytime soon, that they will be patient. I don’t know, but maybe they think that the low oil prices will help keep inflation in check. After hearing this, the stock market has been on a rampage. I don’t think that we will see a top until sometime in the next interest rate raising cycle, which Yellen has said won’t be anytime soon, whenever that be. In the mean time, the bubble that is the stock market will keep getting pumped higher and higher. I look for oil to test the 50 area.

I don’t see how they can let interest rates get to where they should be considering the massive amount of government debt. Maybe they keep rates low until a massive wave of inflation engulfs us. Regardless of what rout the Fed takes or what happens, this will eventually end very badly.

Merry Christmas to you, too, Michael, and hope you enjoy the holidays with your friends and family.

The night before the US economy plunges in the worst collapse in the entire history of the world, the talking heads will be assuring us that everything will be fine. We’re at something around $250 TRILLION in unfunded liabilities. We’re a dead chicken staggering; liberalism has already killed us.

God foreknew these days were coming. He knew OBAMA was coming, knew the toxic wickedness that Obama would poison the soul of America with. And He knew the Antichrist would follow Obama.

Yeah, I’m not the guy to ask if you want an “I’m optimistic about how good the American people have become and eager to see how God will bless this pure and devoted people.” Because I’m screaming, “NOT!!!”

But Merry Christmas, dog walker, from one who believes that God IS u in control and WILL ultimately bless all those who bless Him even as He now begins in these last days to curse all those who curse Him.