Islamofascism,
militant Islam, radical Islam, suicide bombers, jihadis, et. al.,
occupy the mind of not just the beleaguered
Pakistani suffering its categorical imperatives, but also the Western
mind worrying about the end of their modern Western Civilization at
the hands of some antediluvian 'Ali
Baba' barbarians.
[1] In fact, Daniel
Pipes had put it
thusly: “[It is] Not a Clash of Civilizations,
It's a Clash between the Civilized World and Barbarians.”
[2]

While
it is expected that the purveyors of “Imperial
Mobilization”
[3] will try to sell the burden of their 'la mission
civilisatrice' to the
barbarians, it is always a bit inexplicable that the barbarians
should, in every generation, young and old, man and woman, also sell
the same to their own 'sheep to the slaughter' – except of
course if one recalls the perceptive wisdom of Dr.
Martin Luther King,
whence, the colonized Negro trivially “changes
from the representative of the Negro to the white man into the white
man's representative to the Negro.” [4] Even having
understood that tortuous colonizing effect which synthesizes
voluntary servitude, I am still filled with consternation when I come
across Pakistani Negroes pitching the 'white man's burden'. In an
empirical modernity when even distant reality is visible to all and
sundry, the astute observation of MLK is no consolation: “The
tragedy is that too often he does not recognize what has happened to
him.”
[ibid.]

Take
for example, the recent article “Suicide
attacks – religious flair!”
[5] by a relatively unknown Pakistani “freelance
journalist” [usually
also a cover for intelligence agents, assets and sayanim]which stated: “Radical forces in
Pakistan have given a new dimension to suicide attacks in today’s
environment by intermixing it with religion and collective tasks.
Religious flair concept is borrowed from freedom fighters engaged
mostly with US or Israeli security apparatus in Palestine or Iraq”,
and went on to analyze the construction of this “new
dimension”. This
colonists' conceptualization of manufactured reality, borne entirely
of seeding circuses of “doctrinal motivation,
intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification”
[6] for the benefit of its own Western peoples, as well as for
blinding the pending meals to their own slaughter
under the Hegelian butcher's knife, is endemic throughout the
mainstream newsmedia in Pakistan. And of course, it is also systemic
everywhere else, wherever the “Mighty
Wurlitzer's”
[7] suzerainty reigns supreme [8].
In this essay I take the bull by the horn and cleave it asunder, yet
again – for the 'Negro' disease continues to plague the
'untermenschen' and shows no sign of being contained, never mind
eradicated.

The
cited article is quite illustrative of fabricated narratives which
attempt to give reality to the 'Unbirthday
party' of tortuous “Islamofascism”
while entirely omitting to recognize its deliberately manufactured
roots to create the pretexts for fighting the lifetime of “World
War IV”
[9], and therefore, its omissions – the cardinal
sin of the vulgar propagandists –
cannot be taken lightly. Inadvertent or calculated is immaterial,
because, as was duly noted by one more skilled and insightful on
matters existential, its utility in modernity to manufacture consent
remains unsurpassed:

“Great
is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is
silence about truth. By simply not mentioning certain subjects...
totalitarian propagandists have influenced opinion much more
effectively than they could have by the most eloquent denunciations.”
(Aldous Huxley)

The
grotesque fact of the matter is that the following PBS video clip of
Zbigniew Brzezinski from 1980, and the
February 18, 1980 Time Magazine's description of what the jihadist
American National Security Advisor was doing at the Pak-Afghan border
“Selling
the Carter Doctrine”,
are in action triple-replay today in some
Hegelian variations:

The
transcription of that one-minute video clip of not too distant past
is revealing of America's covert role in making patsies of the
'untermenschen' without any moral
compunction:

News
voice over 1980:“US National Security Advisor
Brzezinski flew to Pakistan to set about rallying resistance. He
wanted to arm the Mujahideen without revealing America's role. On the
Afghan border near the Khayber Pass, he
urged the Soldiers of God to redouble their efforts”

Brzezinski
1980:“We know of their deep belief in God, and we are
confident that their struggle will succeed. That land over there, is
yours, you'll go back to it one day, because your fight will prevail,
and you'll have your homes and your mosques back again; because your
cause is right; God is on your side.” [enthusiastic
clapping by the Mujahideens]

Brzezinski
1990s in the studio speaking to the PBS interviewer:“...
[garbled] coordinated with the Pakistanis will be to make the Soviets
bleed, for as much, as long, as possible.”

Surely,
the learned “freelance
journalist” does not work
for the RAND Corporation as a shill for the New World
Order, like all the other two-bit 'native-informants' from
Pakistan, to not know of such blood-soaked modus operandi for waging
war by way of deception?

Surely,
the “freelance journalist”
is herself not so co-opted as to not realize that when she
imaginatively alludes to the “Indian” hand like
the Pakistani newsmedia and the ISI routinely parrot: “Or
some external elements, like Indian spy agencies protecting their
interest, and utilising local hands for
logistics and support in orchestrating suicide attacks in urban parts
of the country”, that a diabolical 'Jundallah-plusplus'
is operational in Pakistan with full cooperation from Pakistan's own
military apparatchiks?

Or
is it genuinely way past the wit of all Pakistani columnists,
purported scholars, lauded think-tankers, career foreign service
bureaucrats, military intelligence, and
indeed the entire highly paid Pakistani newsmedia,
to realize that these manufactured
covert-ops are funded by NATO and Pentagon black-ops dollars, and
doing to Pakistan from her own soil with suitcases full of dollars,
precisely what the CIA-ISI tag-team covertly did to the USSR from the
same “PAK” soil not too long
ago?

Suitcases
full of cash and cultivated “well-placed bureaucrats”
for orchestrating covert operations is an old phenomenon in
Pakistan as even candidly admitted by a
former Director of the ISI in his 1995 memoirs “Profiles
of Intelligence”
[10]. As an insider to the intelligence
apparatus, he observed of the history of American
Interventionism in Pakistan:

'Essentially,
the US policy configurations vis-a-vis Pakistan have been that of a
“master” and not of a “friend”. Oscillating
between persuasion and coercion, the US tends to employ all available
means to keep Pakistan under watch, pressure and diplomatic
subjugation. At times, it has used the 'carrot and stick' of aid, and
at others, lashed out threats of economic strangulation or declaring
Pakistan a terrorist state.

Pakistan's
geostrategic position, nuclear capability,
agricultural and technological potential, as well as the Islamic
ideological base are matters of vital concern to US policy makers.
The US will not and cannot allow Pakistan to govern her own affairs.
While Pakistan was still in its infancy, the American hawks pounced
upon and hijacked our national interests by building up an
exaggerated threat of the former Soviet Union's expansionist designs
against Pakistan and their so called 'mad' drive to the warm waters.
...'

Having
been trivially made patsies once by selling Pakistan's military the
“strategic-depth” snake-oil enticement, the American
oligarchs have invented the new boogieman to make patsies of the
Negroes once again with some new snake-oil of their “benefit”
in the New World Order, for Pakistanis are entirely eager to dance to
the tune of the 'white man' regardless of the song. The Director of
the ISI further noted of the covert-ops penetration (in Pakistan) by
the CIA:

'The
CIA is known for adopting various covert and overt means to undermine
the integrity of other countries for achieving their own objectives
and furthering their 'nefarious' designs. It is equipped with
colossal material resources and its men are canny and ruthless in
executing their assignments. Their methods in madness include:

Therefore,
as existential proof of the State itself deceptively abetting such
covert-ops in Pakistan today, is simply examining what the already
'well-outed in the Western mainstream'
terrorist outfit named 'Jundallah' is doing to beleaguered
Iran, our next door Muslim neighbor, even as we speak, and again from
the same “PAK” soil, and yet
how it is plainly getting away with it, really beyond the sensible
wit of rational man to make logical deductions from?

Are
these geopolitically driven orchestration of events, while closely
spaced in time for which no hard receipts and confessionals can be
found until after fait accompli, but which are altogether quite
transparently being orchestrated on the Grand Chessboard, really so
hard to fathom? Surely not! Please see for instance “Iran,
the Associated Press, and Covert-War of 'Imperial Mobilization'”.
[11]

Pakistan
today is truly the “petri-dish of international terrorism”
as was stated by the late Benazir Bhutto at the Council on Foreign
Relations on August
15, 2007 [12]
before she ventured to return to Pakistan with their overt blessings.
But that unfortunate source of terror is the despicable State itself,
and the equally despicable Western apparatus which fully controls and
funds it as a subservient client-state. The erstwhile twice-leader of
Pakistan and the scion of a
worthy-name simply neglected to mention that fact as she graced the
'radical Islamists' – the state's own
construction – with that lofty aphorism thinking that's what
the rulers of the world wanted to hear. The same blunder is being
made by Nawaz Sharif and all the others in Pakistan.

The
Pakistani newsmedia therefore, is also following the diktats of
“wisdom” du jour. Thus it is unsurprising that the
perspective developed in the article by the “freelance
journalist” would also characteristically omit any mention
of the tortuous set-up for the deliberate orchestration of the
balkanization
of Pakistan
[13] with the devilish connivance of the state's own fifth
columnists. The history of clever deployment of “doctrinal
motivation” through a high degree of “intellectual
commitment” to craftily re-synthesize “God
is on your side” for illiterate and aggrieved patsies
has been so cleverly omitted, that one might think such Machiavellian
concepts don't, and cannot, exist in West's highly ethical modernity
(sic!).

While
no one is surely perfect and all-knowing, especially when it comes to
the complex deception laden, Hegelian
dialectics driven “imperial mobilization”
agendas for 'one-world'
government
[14], perhaps all who wish to pay lip service to
concern for humanity and eagerly pick up the mighty pen to defend it
against tyranny, might spend some useful
time first researching how “imperial mobilization”
is actually conducted with false-flag operations seeding the enabling
pretexts, lest they inadvertently lead others astray. They might
delve into how NATO intelligence conducted 'Operation Gladio' for
creating and sustaining the 'Strategy of Tension' in Western Europe
in order to keep the fear of the barbaric 'communists taking over'
perpetually alive in the mind of the European public. Many a wanton
terrorist act (purportedly) by NATO intelligence, were blamed on
their own manipulated patsies like the Red Brigade and the boogieman
then in vogue, the godless armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons
“communists”. [15]

And
today, it is the fully god-imbibed, but supposedly even more barbaric
armed to the teeth with box-cutters “islamofascists”.
The play of Hegelian dialectics is so superbly orchestrated that no
conventional mind can reach the zenith of its moral depravity. The
seeds of which, interestingly so, were devilishly re-planted by
Bernard Lewis in 1990 right after the demise of the communist USSR,
when he coined the mantra “Clash of Civilization” for
the same Council on Foreign Relations to which Benazir Bhutto
continually paid homage throughout her
career.

Bernard
Lewis, the “vulgar propagandist” (as
knighted by Noam Chomsky in a video interview on CBC, December
9, 2003,
see part-2 [16]), seeded this devilish mantra in CFR's Foreign
Affairs in 1990 thusly, in order to re-harvest the previously
celebrated Brzezinski appendage now left
adrift after the satisfactory conclusion of the ten year Afghan War.
The bleeding dissolution of the USSR for which both Brzezinski
[17], and the judeofascist American
Enterprise Institute
from where George W. Bush had
“borrowed twenty [of its] finest minds”
[18] to wage the new lifetime of 'war on terror', had entirely
taken full unshared-credit. [19]

“In
1990 Bernard Lewis, a leading Western scholar of Islam, analyzed 'The
Roots of Muslim Rage,' and concluded: 'It should now be clear that we
are facing a mood and a movement far transcending the level of issues
and policies and the governments that pursue them. This is no less
than a clash of civilizations - that perhaps irrational but surely
historic reaction of an ancient rival against our Judeo-Christian
heritage, our secular present, and the worldwide expansion of both.
It is crucially important that we on our side should not be provoked
into an equally historic but also equally irrational reaction against
our rival.' ” (Samuel Huntington in Clash of Civilization).

Only
eleven years later, that 'Muslim rage' was
catastrophically enacted on the international scene – a
“catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new
Pearl Harbor”
[20] – supposedly by an islamofascist
'Ali Baba' [21]
named 'Bin
Laden' [22] to
re-enable “imperial mobilization”.
The distance between seeding mantras and its harvesting does not seem
to be a very long epoch in the scientific modernity du jour when only
“Prisoners
of the Cave”
[23] abound in astronomically large numbers.

This
isn't rocket science, only political science. A state-craft
perversely seeded in the atheistic “Noble
Lies” of
the Straussian 'Ubermensch'
[24]. “Hegemony is as old as mankind” [25]
is their sole 'bible', and “one-world government”,
their sole imperative [26]. Their calculus of global primacy
principally entails Machiavellianly seeding
“revolutionary times” all across the
“global zone of percolating violence” [27]
– the 'war on terror' [28] – while
simultaneously precipitating the global
financial collapse to make “an end run around national
sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece”. [29] The
devil's apprentices have cleverly perceived of a gullible mankind
bred on 'bread and circuses', that, “what is
inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times.”
[30] Any people will accept under times of stress, turmoil,
uncertainty, and war, what they wouldn't
under peaceful times. The best way to transform a people, a society,
or a world, is to plague them with a lifetime of warfare [31].

The
incremental fait accompli inducing baby-steps towards full spectrum
transformation of the planet into a world government, unfortunately
includes the deadly balkanization and de-nuking of Pakistan. It is
part of the long-running genesis-to-genocide death-rebirth cycle of
repeatedly raising the phoenix from the grotesquely burnt ashes of
humanity. Only a catastrophic destruction of the existing order can
lead to the ultimate New World Order of the globalists: an infernal
global police state. As connivingly argued by Bertrand Russell, “It
seems to follow that a world government could only be kept in being
by force,” [32]. All the world wars of the twentieth
century were incrementally transformative towards this very
globalists' agenda, and the World War IV that we are unfortunate to
be living through as the generation caught “Between Two
Ages” [33], is intended to induce the grotesque “birth
pangs” for the devil's bastard child.

To
ensure that not one iota of the preceding paragraphs was ever treated
as mere philosophical gibberish by the super-learned of the planet,
an exquisite Western Negro unabashedly summed up her white man's
blood-stained agenda on how labor-pains are to be induced across the
raped “global zone of percolating violence”
in these delectable words:

“What
we're seeing here, in a sense, is…the birth pangs of a new
Middle East and whatever we do, we have to be certain that we're
pushing forward to the new Middle East, not going back to the old
one.” (U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza
Rice, July 21, 2006)

With
all the empirical evidence of Western barbarianism seen in
Afghanistan and Iraq, and the surfeit of doctrinal evidence of the
latest 'white man's burden', only a fool, or a treasonous mercenary
would deny or ignore the American shenanigans in Pakistan, Iran, and
in the “global zone of percolating violence”.
As noted elsewhere on Project
Humanbeingsfirst's website,
while sensibly trying to talk Pakistani military out from perversely
contributing to our own treasonous demise by our military bombing our
own peoples to smithereens, when I had gratuitously
suggested to some newly retired Pakistani Generals that I could
trivially construct a suicide bomber to their precise specification,
of ht, wt, sex, and other unmentionable body-part specification for
less than a certain amount of dollars to make the palpable point of
how easy it was to manufacture “jihadis” after you have
shattered their tabula rasa and created an ambiance
of sustained “jihadist”
indoctrination over the past 30 years, I had been stunned when one of
them had immediately remarked, something to the effect: “Zahir
you are asking too much – I can do it for much less, around
2000 dollars”.

After
having patiently listened to me rant non-stop for over three hours on
how Machiavellian political theology runs the modern world, the
mighty military men (Ret. with full honors
I hasten to add) of Pakistan had silently departed, having first
agreed with me that the suicide bombings in Pakistan weren't very
difficult to fabricate under the present manufactured triumvirate
climate of deprivation, indoctrination, and civilian-killings, that
these suicide attacks were not a native
part of our historical-cultural-sociological-makeup,
and that it had suddenly cropped up in Pakistan only in the aftermath
of 911. They however left hanging, the plaintiff's
obvious begging question, why persist in acts which only create more
of that?

The
real issue is not that the suicide bombings are fabricated, or how
they are fabricated and inculcated as an expression of political
dissatisfaction (see for instance 'Dying to Win – The Strategic
Logic of Suicide Terrorism' by Robert A.
Pape, 2005), but WHO is manufacturing this
abhorrence at the top of the
compartmentalized chain of command! That isn't very hard to answer
either. Simply ask cui bono!

For
anyone to pretend that the blatant agenda for the balkanization of
Pakistan by the United States of America – the self proclaimed
hectoring
hegemons [34] –
is not the crucial prime-mover behind Pakistan's calculated
destabilization with these wanton
acts of terror that are entirely reminiscent
of 'Operation Gladio' even to the extent of rapid blame attribution
to the 'communists' du jour, i.e., the 'Islamofascists', is either
foolhardiness, or outright treasonous. While
a fool can surely be educated, and being one is hardly a crime, the
fair tradition of dealing with traitors in all societies
demands that the treasonous be hanged without mercy. The moral
lessons of modernity further stipulate that this occur only after
administering the full rites of the 'Enemy Combatant' protocol. Any
Pakistani to still be perpetuating America's fabricated mantras as
“Our War”
after what the world has blatantly witnessed in Iraq, can only be of
the latter kind.Indeed, before coming to
power, Mr. Zardari had eagerly asserted, echoing his late wife's
sentiments, as also Pakistan military's and its politicians' and
newsmedia's aspiration:

'The
Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), if it comes into power, must
persuade the people that the fight against militants is “our
war”, not just America’s war'
( Daily Times, February 17, 2008, 'Taliban fight is our
war: Zardari')

For
one given to much rational cynicism, the sole intent of this vulgar
propaganda today appears to be for putting Pakistan's military back
in the driving seat for the much desired 'unity of command' that was
lost when America's favorite posterchild
braving the line-of-fire, General PM, fell into disfavor. The
terrorist act in Lahore, as was also noted by dictatorshipwatch.com
editor [35],
suggests precisely that calculated highest order purpose, of
manufacturing sympathy for the previously maligned local bad-guys in
order for the elected politicians to officially hand control back to
the 'unity of command' of the military as the lesser of all evils
without any resistance from the public.

And
while I too believe that Pakistan's nuclear-armed military today
(assuming they haven't already been disarmed) still holds the
infernal key to saving Pakistan through rational and
independent-minded realpolitik – as
noted in this 2007
Open Letter to Pakistani General
[36] – that courageous act of putting out the deliberately
lighted fire cannot happen while the 'arsonists are running
all the fire brigades in town'!

It
must be obvious to anyone that it is rather trivial today to curry
favor from the ruling elite – become their shill and bleat the
mantra of 'Islamofascism', delve deeply into some arcane aspects of
it but keep that very axiom intact. One will surely get noticed
eventually, and perhaps acquire a chair at the Hudson, or get
employment at the RAND. Minimally, one will get invited to speak at
JINSA and Heritage, get published in mainstream news, and variously
earn tangible and intangible benefits. And if one would rather play
dissent to win over the odd rabble rouser and 'malcontent', composing
something like “Between Imperialism and Islamism” (as
Pervez Hoodbhoy did in the Himal Southasian,
October-November 2007 issue), will surely lead to invitation at the
911 memorial in New York to speak to 'Muslim-terrorism'.

In
either case, whether participating in
manufacturing
consent among the gullible masses, or dissent among the 'malcontent'
[37], so long as one keeps intact the core-axioms of empire –
which today happens to be the narratives of 'Islamofascism' –
in these hard times when the military-industrial complex is emerging
as the largest and the only superfunded
global employer for its war-making global police-state agenda, which
of course also includes vulgar propaganda for both Orwellian and
Huxleyan imposition of forced and voluntary
servitude, it's surely a rational move to join empire. One can, at
least, finally earn a decent living when only joblessness and despair
surrounds one. After all, one has to feed the family first, before
one can fight the good fight.

Perhaps
Project
Humanbeingsfirst.org
and all those upholding the same categorical imperatives, ought to do
the same. We are surely wasting our valuable time and our life going
against the grain and standing up to
the threats of Hemlock – when we can simply become the favored
peoples of our rulers! Okay, perhaps the skin-color for some might
get in the way. But surely, that can be made up by the “virtue”
of empire also acquiring the remaining un co-opted type-3 people “who
critically examine ... and judge accordingly” on their
payroll (see Mein
Kampf,
vol 1, ch 10, pg 240, for Hitler's
classification of populations). Imagine all the riches.... all of
which we shall surely take with us to our grave to bribe the hungry
maggots and entice the proverbial Soul
Extractor.

[6]
Zbigniew Brzezinski, Op. Cit., pg 212. Full quote: “More
generally, cultural change in America may also be uncongenial to the
sustained exercise abroad of genuinely imperial power. That exercise
requires a high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual
commitment, and patriotic gratification.”

[7]
WILLIAM SCHAAP, attorney, expert witness on media disinformation
under sworn court testimony, full statement: “When you read
the books about the history of the CIA, one of the heroes was the
first man in charge of media operations, a man named Frank Wizner.
And they referred to his organization as the Mighty Wurlitzer. And
there's this image of this guy sitting at one of those giant organs,
you know, with seventeen keyboards and you're playing this -- sort of
like The Phantom of the Opera in that scene, and there was the guy
running the CIA media operations all around the world. And he really
was because every single city of any size on earth, he had some
employee who was -- supposedly worked for a newspaper or a magazine
or a radio station or a wire service, and they could get stories
anywhere.” Video at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbnxsPgcsH0&feature=PlayList&p=BA69081DC9C0AE84&index=0
; Also see Zahir Ebrahim, A Note on the Mighty Wurlitzer,
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/05/note-on-mighty-wurlitzer.html

[9]
Charles Feldman and Stan Wilson, Ex-CIA
director: U.S. faces 'World War IV', April 03, 2003, CNN, full
statement: 'Former CIA Director James Woolsey
said Wednesday the United States is engaged in World War IV, and that
it could continue for years. In the address to a group of college
students, Woolsey described the Cold War as the third world war and
said "This fourth world war, I think, will last considerably
longer than either World Wars I or II did for us. Hopefully not the
full four-plus decades of the Cold War." He said the new war is
actually against three enemies: the religious rulers of Iran, the
"fascists" of Iraq and Syria, and Islamic extremists like
al Qaeda. Woolsey told the audience of about 300, most of whom are
students at the University of California at Los Angeles, that all
three enemies have waged war against the United States for several
years but the United States has just "finally noticed." "As
we move toward a new Middle East," Woolsey said, "over the
years and, I think, over the decades to come ... we will make a lot
of people very nervous." It will be America's backing of
democratic movements throughout the Middle East that will bring about
this sense of unease, he said. "Our response should be, 'good!'"
Woolsey said. '

[10]
Brigadier Tirmazi, Profiles of Intelligence, 1995, excerpted in
Zahir Ebrahim, Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? In her own words!, February
04, 2008
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2008/02/who-killed-benazir-bhutto-herownwords.html

[12]
CFR Transcript, A Conversation With Benazir Bhutto, August 15,
2007, NY. Introduced by CFR President RICHARD N. HAASS as follows:
“It is, for me, a personal pleasure to welcome back to the
Council on Foreign Relations an old friend of mine and someone who is
familiar to many of you in this room and knows well this
organization, the former prime minister of Pakistan, Benazir
Bhutto.” The full quote of
Benazir Bhutto: “I seek to lead a democratic Pakistan
which is free from the yoke of military dictatorship and that will
cease to be a haven, the very petri dish of international terrorism.”
http://www.cfr.org/publication/14041

[13]
Zahir Ebrahim, The Day After – American Agenda for
Pakistan, March 21, 2009,
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/03/day-after-dawn-mar212009.html

[18]
George W. Bush, 26 February 2003, speaking to AEI: “Some
of the finest minds of our nation are at work on some of the greatest
challenges to our nation. You do such good work that my
administration has borrowed twenty such minds. I want to thank them
for their service.”

[19]
AEI history, under the heading “AEI's
Diamond Jubilee, 1943-2003”, at http://aei.org,
full statement: “The 1980s were great years for AEI's ideas
but troubled years for the institution itself. President Ronald
Reagan appointed several dozen AEI scholars and fellows to his
administration and to federal judgeships, where they helped him to
achieve monumental improvements in economic, regulatory, and legal
policy and to deploy the more assertive foreign policy that
dispatched Soviet Communism by decade's end.”

[20]
PNAC Report, Rebuilding America's Defenses, 2000, full context:
“Until the process of transformation is treated as an
enduring military mission – worthy of constant allocation of
dollars and forces – it will remain stillborn”,
page 58 ; “Further, the process of transformation,
even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one,
absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new
Pearl Harbor”, page
51.

[26]
Zahir Ebrahim, Response to
Financial Times Gideon Rachman's 'And now for a world government',
December 11, 2008,
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2008/12/responseto-ft-gideon-rachman-worldgov.html

[27]
Zbigniew Brzezinski, Op. Cit.,
map pg 53.

[28]
Zahir Ebrahim, From Balance of
Terror to Unilateral Terror on the Grand Chessboard!, April 26, 2008,
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2008/04/balanceof-terror-tounilateral-terror.html

[29]Richard N. Gardner,
The Hard Road To World Order, Foreign Affairs, CFR, April 1974, full
quote: “In short, the ‘house of world order’
will have to be built from the bottom up, rather than from the top
down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’
to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end
run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will
accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”
http://www.thepowerhour.com/articles/HardRoadtoWorldOrder.pdf

[30]
David Ben Gurion

[31]
Norman Dodd, Congressional Investigator, interview disclosure to
G. Edward Griffin, The Hidden Agenda of Tax Exempt Foundations for
World Government, full statement regarding what was uncovered during
the 1953-1954 Congress sanctioned investigation by the Reece
Committee in the 1908 minute books of the Carnegie Endowment for
Peace: 'We are now at the year 1908, which was the year that the
Carnegie Foundation began operations. In that year, the trustees,
meeting for the first time, raised a specific question, which they
discussed throughout the balance of the year in a very learned
fashion. The question is: “Is there any means known more
effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire
people?” And they conclude that no more effective means than
war to that end is known to humanity.'
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8605813744843314322 ; also
see full excerpt in Zahir Ebrahim, The Monetary Conspiracy For
World Government, November 23, 2008,
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2008/11/monetary-conspiracy-world-government.html

[35]
Abid Jan, Lahore Attack: One in
the many steps towards making Pakistan another Afghanistan,
editorial, March 30, 2009,
http://www.dictatorshipwatch.com/2009/03/30/lahore-attack-one-in-the-many-steps-towards-making-pakistan-another-afghanistan.html

The
author, an ordinary researcher and writer on contemporary
geopolitics, a minor justice activist, grew up in Pakistan, studied
EECS at MIT, engineered for a while in high-tech Silicon Valley
(patents here),
and retired early to pursue other responsible interests. His maiden
2003 book was rejected by six publishers and can be read on the web
at http://PrisonersoftheCave.org.
He may be reached at http://Humanbeingsfirst.org.
Verbatim reproduction license at
http://humanbeingsfirst.org/#Copyright.

First Published April
03, 2009 | Last Updated 04052009 233809 5749

Links
Updated: 091920091325095749

Links
Fixed April 21, 2016

Between Imperial Mobilization and
Islamofascism: Bribing the Maggots and the
Soul Extractor 16/16

Reprint License

All
material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with
full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety,
unmodified and unedited, for any purpose, granted in perpetuity,
provided the source URL sentence and this copyright notice are also reproduced verbatim as part
of this restricted Reprint License, along with any embedded links within its
main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license
violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All figures, images,
quotations and excerpts, are used without permission based on
non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research
use only in the greater public interest, documenting crimes
against humanity, deconstructing current affairs, and scholarly
commentary. The usage by Project Humanbeingsfirst of all external
material is minimally consistent with the understanding of "fair
use" laws at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html.
Project Humanbeingsfirst does not endorse any external website or organization it links to or references, nor those that may link to it or reprint its works.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you
are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your
request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents
in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the
documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You
are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from
other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”.