Climate change is among the biggest injustices our world currently faces. At COP22 I attended panel after panel filled with speakers marginalized by climate change. They included people from small island nations that will be underwater as sea levels continue to rise, indigenous women worried about the survival of their culture in the face of climate change, and activists concerned about how to hold countries accountable to their NDCs (Nationally Determined Contributions) that each country has committed to through the Paris Agreement. These people share common fears and hope for the future.​COP22 was filled with optimism. But at the same time, I fear there will not be justice.

Protest at COP22: The Human Face of Climate Change

A woman from the Maldives, a small island nation, said quite convincingly, “We cannot have climate justice without ensuring the lives of all people on the planet.” It is no secret that those whose lives will be most affected by climate change are not those who are contributing the most to it. If you’re not convinced, check out the CAIT Climate Equity Explorer, a nifty interface that lets you compare up to 12 different nations on various factors such as current emissions, vulnerability, and development indicators.​The inequalities of climate change are well studied and well known. In other words, they are facts. Unfortunately, in the world of climate change denial the boundary between facts and opinions is getting harder to see. In a press conference at COP22, the head US Negotiator and the State Department Special Envoy for Climate Change, Dr. Jonathan Pershing, quoted Daniel Patrick Moynihan in reference to climate change deniers: “You are entitled to your own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.”

Climate change deniers treat their opinions that climate change is not real or is not a problem as facts. This is a very common exercise of free speech, but one that should be analyzed carefully. We all know that it is unacceptable to falsely yell “FIRE!” in a crowded theater because an ensuing panic could hurt others.

Why do we not treat climate change denial in the same way?

On his website, Ethics and Climate, Don Brown has written on why climate change denial is neither “responsible scientific skepticism” nor a reasonable exercise of free speech. His blog is intriguing, and if you have some free time I highly recommend it.

​At the very least, climate change is ethically unacceptable. At the worst, climate change denial is a crime against humanity. In his Nov. 16th speech to the COP, US Secretary of State John Kerry stated that falling short in meeting the challenge of limiting global temperature increase to 2°C would be “the single greatest instance in modern history of a generation in a time of crisis abdicating responsibility for the future. And it won’t just be a policy failure; because of the nature of this challenge, it will be a moral failure, a betrayal of devastating consequence.”

US Secretary of State John Kerry giving a speech at COP22 on November 16, 2016.

I am currently taking a Social and Political Philosophy class, and we’ve spent the semester discussing what justice looks like and how a just society would operate. I’ve learned how to reason through a philosophy argument, and how to spot fallacies in the arguments of others. We’ve debated the merits and potential problems of different political philosophies. That’s the thing with philosophy: you have to be able to back up your argument.

There is no reasonable, fact-based way to back up the climate change denial argument. Climate change denial is immoral. Denial justifies inaction. Inaction leads to very real consequences that cost people their lives. In John Kerry’s words, “No one has a right to make decisions that affect billions of people based on solely ideology or without proper input.”

There is no “international climate change court.” We cannot place a country on trial for failing to act on climate change. However, it was recently ruled that a lawsuit filed by 21 youth plaintiffsagainst the US government and fossil fuel companies could proceed on the basis that failing to act on climate change violates their constitutional rights to life, liberty, and property. In 2015, a landmark decision in the Netherlands is forcing the Dutch government to cut emissions by 25% within five years. The decision marked the first time that human rights and tort law were invoked in a lawsuit involving climate liability.

We will have to wait and see if courts are even capable of providing the justice the future of the planet is depending on. If not, we will have to rely on our own moral compasses to convince our leaders to act. Near the end of his speech, Kerry said “We have to continue to hold each other accountable for the choices that our nations make.”​An individual person’s moral convictions are a powerful thing. I am writing this blogpost out of a deep-rooted unwavering conviction that failing to act on climate change is profoundly selfish, ignorant, wrong, and unjust. Someday there will be a US Presidential election where climate justice isn’t a partisan issue. It is up to us to make it as soon as possible. Until then, we must hold each other accountable for the moral failures of our society with our hearts and our heads, and hope that justice won’t be served too late.

I too recently heard that under the new administration our stance is to deny climate change in the United States. But this shouldn't come as a surprise, it's been said that global warming was just a hoax created by the Chinese government to scam the United States. As you've said before, there is factual information and there are ignorant opinions. It has been proved again and again in many different ways that global warming does exist. This isn't political, this is strictly fact based. I too have heard of the lawsuit that is currently taking place against the current administration. Now more than ever it is important for this case to win. Every single piece of scientific information regarding the environment is pointing towards how this is destroying our earth at a much faster rate than normally. But under this new administration where we will completely ignore the issue of climate change, we will be decreasing earths lifespan many years. In the past few years alone we have made so many advancements to have a better future. With almost every country having joined the Paris Agreement, this shows how this issue is becoming very crucial to address as the consequences for not doing so are massive and are getting closer each day that passes. Also, 2016 is the first year where more money has been invested in clean energy than in coal and fossil fuels. We have made so many advancement and have come so far that that to throw it all away would set us back so many years. It is so crucial for this lawsuit to go through to the Supreme Court and for it to be made clear that by depleting and destroying our earth and its resources we really are making future generation lives at risk.

Reply

Gracen

12/5/2016 07:29:49 am

I fully agree with your statement that not agreeing with or refusing to find ways to prevent climate change is selfish, ignorant, wrong, and unjust. I too hope that one day, our elections do not have to focus on whether climate change is a problem, but rather involve discussion as to what each candidate plans to do to resolve climate change for the four years in office. I believe that while it is our duty to believe in the facts, it is also our duty to educate those who do not believe due to lack of education, into understanding why our cause matters. That is our duty and to ignore that is just as wrong. I hope that the results of this election does not push us farther away from an election with both candidates knowing climate change is real and not a hoax.

Living on this planet will eventually boil down to the right to life and space if we don't find ways to curtail global warming. It's obvious the powers to be are not concerned with the rest of the world's problem of survival when seas levels rise or other disasters hit. Cudo's to the 21 students that are taking action for their constitutional rights to life.

Reply

Caroline Haller

12/14/2016 01:26:26 pm

I know all to well the moral conflicts that come with your loved ones denying climate change. All around me I have friends, family and coworkers who are having the same debate over and over again, "why should we believe in climate change when theres evidence against in?" My answer to them has always been the same, "because its not a gamble that we can afford to lose as a race."

It blows my mind when I hear people deny facts that have been proven time and time again all because people with no scientific background say that climate change is a myth. What makes me even more angry is that people who deny climate change will read article after article about why its a myth but will ever take the time to sit down and look at straight facts.

As we move into a new presidency I am increasingly getting more nervous about having a president that denies climate. The masses will look to him as a leader, and people who already deny climate change will be validated whereas people who do support it may question if they are correct. If we as a race are going to make the needed changes in order to save this planet than the changes need to start with people who are in a position of power. Without changes taking place within our government I worry that the changes we need to make will be put off indefinitely, or until this presidency is over.

Reply

osman ibrahim

9/20/2017 03:21:30 pm

Do you need an urgent loan for business or to pay bills at 2% interest rate? We offer Personal Loan, Real Estate Loan, Business Loan and others to prospective individuals, companies, cooperate bodies as well as organizations. No matter your credits score ranging from $5000 dollars to $20,000,000.00 duration period of 1 to 30 years Please allow up to 12 hours after applying for a loan to be contacted Any interested person should contact us with the below information. Email Us: ibrahimfunds5@gmail.com Tell: +919818473167 First Name:__________ Last Name:_________ Age:__________ Gender:__________ Address:____________ Country:_________ MARITAL STATUS:__________ OCCUPATION:__________ MONTHLY INCOME:__________ Mobil Number:__________ LOAN AMOUNT NEEDED:__________ Loan Amount Needed:__________ Loan Duration:__________ Purpose Of Loan:__________ Email Us: ibrahimfunds5@gmail.com Tell: +919818473167

Reply

Gaven Sovero

10/24/2017 09:54:01 am

I thoroughly enjoyed reading your blog post. I especially liked your analogy about yelling "fire" in a crowded theater. This point really puts climate change denial in to perspective. It sounds like you learned quite a bit at COP22. Keep up the good work!