Is the US government’s impending war with Iraq connected to
weapons inspections? Not long ago, this war was marketed as a response to
Iraq’s assistance to Al Qaeda. The impulse for war shifted as the US government
insisted that Iraq be attacked for amassing weapons of mass destruction while
refusing to allow weapons inspection.

Following Iraq’s agreement to unconditional inspection, the
latest reason for war is simply Saddam Hussein. The decision to attack Iraq
remains steadfast, the justification is refabricated. While critical issues of
oil supply from an increasingly distressed Saudi Arabia and deflated Iraq
remain, perhaps more important domestic reasons power the US government’s
decision for this war.

The nation’s gigantic military industrial complex requires
continual conflict to legitimate its immense costs and flex its power. It
corrupts decency, condones the death of innocent children, women and men. US
sanctions have already killed close to 500,000 children in Iraq, a reasonable
price to pay for protecting the free world, we are told. Inhumanity must not
become a nation’s legacy.

Americans, the people of the US, are being asked to name
their enemies, but not what prompts such hostility. The people of the US are
being asked to overlook the legacies of colonisation, irresponsible
globalisation and militarisation that have brutalised people the world over.
They are asked to support the sanctity of oil in determining policies connected
to West Asia, but not question why relations with Saudi Arabia remain
"normal" while the US prepares to attack Iraq again.

Americans are told that to oppose the Israeli government’s
oppression of Palestinian peoples is anti-Semitic. They are asked to not make
distinctions between the Jewish people and the Israeli state, just as they are
asked to not make distinctions between the US government and its people. Since
when have "the people" become their state?

The corporate media and an arrogant government ask
Americans to overlook the history of US support of dictatorships that have
fomented violent regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Disturbingly too,
the war against terrorism is increasingly confused with a prevailing worldwide
contempt for Islam, enabling the bigoted misinterpretation of Muslims as
monolithic and violent across differences of nation, class, politics, gender,
race and culture.

Afghanistan, post-Taliban, is in ruins as the US and the
international community fail to provide adequate security and resources for her
reconstruction, strengthening regional warlords and disabling Afghanistan’s new
government. The failure of human rights, the violation of women, the
disenfranchisement of returning refugees continue. Such practice dishonours the
commitment to fight terrorism. Peace remains elusive because of a paucity of
commitment to justice.

Within the framework of the campaign against terrorism, the
executive arm of the US has increased its powers of surveillance and
interrogation, and expanded provisions of detention. This erodes the scope of
public scrutiny and the process of law, while narrowing civil liberties.
Extending similar jurisdiction to allied states, the US and the European Union
have remained silent on Russian mistreatment in Chechnya.

Egypt, Uzbekistan, Indonesia, Malaysia have systematically
stilled their commitments to democracy and secularism. China has attempted to
use the campaign against terror to justify its repression of ethnic Uighurs in
Xinjiang, including Muslim minorities and peace advocates. The Government of
India introduced the Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance, a modified security law
that empowers the government to torture and detain minority groups and
political opponents alleged to engage in terrorism.

Governments worldwide, post-9/11, have utilised law and
order to subjugate opposition in the guise of fighting terrorism. The question
what produces and defines terror is not asked, it is consecrated to the custody
of the state. It is of grave concern that democratic dissent and free speech
are increasingly languaged as anti-national where "traitors" must be
disciplined.

The US citizenry is asked for an abiding loyalty to a
government that has shown no accountability. The attempt is to infantalise
Americans into silence. They are either for the ruler or against him.
Democratic processes are dispensed with while asserting a unilateral right to
invade other nations, to make regime changes, to violate international law.
Such hubris, as history reveals, accompanies imperial power.

Meanwhile, the other war of impoverishment and
disenfranchisement continues in the US. The shrinking wages of the American
working class, the increasing disrepair of rural life, escalating costs of
living in urban areas, single mothers without jobs that pay, children without
health care, schools without textbooks, women and men that cannot afford a
college education.

Young African American men fill the prisons — casualties of
institutionalised racism. Countless Vietnam veterans, hated by the right for
losing and the left for fighting, are homeless. Native Americans, on whose
genocide this nation was built, are forced into brutal dispossession as the
state systematically dishonours treaties made with native nations. In a country
of 288 million people, 35.6 million people live below the poverty level.
Environmental pollution, endangered wildlife, nuclear tests, sweatshops, toxic
spills, gang wars, hunger, rising diseases.

Well kept secrets? The national economy is failing, foreign
debt is about $2.5 trillion, workers are being indiscriminately discharged
under circumstances that underscore corporate irresponsibility. This too is
life at the centre of the empire. There are no plans for atonement. Ever
vigorous trade and war with an expanding number of peoples and countries will
not resolve internal crises. It is a tired strategy that only compounds the
disarray.

The horrors of September 11 have jolted the national
fabric. Hopefully, its legacy is the awakening of new forms of American
citizenship — pro-active, pro-conscience, and affirmative of a global
commitment to human rights predicated on social justice. In the centre of the
empire named the United States of America, the people are taking it to the
streets.