More and more I feel like that old ad campaign Or in this case, is it a buddy or is it a bot?Makes me wanna leave all the bots and bods behind and go swing in a tropical hammock in Roatan where I can’t get a stable wireless signal to save myself…heh.The sex robot can download personalities, which is pretty weird.

Having sex with a simulation of a woman is not an ok substitute for having sex with someone you respect.

In my mind, sex robots like these are designed to make men treat women as bodies, and not as people with emotions, thoughts, and spirits.

Because, as Colbert said, Touche, Stephen…I am LMAO, if I dare use a acronym such as that in a blog post.

Here are my thoughts on sex robots: It takes the human joy of sexuality out of sexual intercourse, and it is not a healthy form of sexual expression.

This stigmatizes and marginalizes some forms of gender and sexuality.

The other issue that comes to mind is the sex with the robot itself. The SF Chronicle has a great article about this if you want to read more…(Note, the above video above is short and hilarious, please watch it.IF you cannot get the embedded video to work, you can watch the clip here).”‘targeting’ kids, but they’re getting splashed in the backwash of behavioral messaging.Figure for every teen swigging alcopops and energy drinks in wannabe style, there’s another buying into the beer-n-babes positioning, taking cues from this Heineken ‘hiney’ messaging on how to treat, view and ogle females.”My Thoughts On Sex Robots by Dan Jubelirer (published on Amplify Jan 12, 2010) On last nights’ show, Colbert covered the invention of a sex robot that has touch sensors and the ability to download different personalities.The robot just lies there, in a submissive position, and does nothing. I have nothing against men or women being sexual, and sex toys that help people masturbate or pleasure a partner are not wrong. Or is it a way for men to get all the “perks” of sexual intercourse without the messy ordeal of dealing with another person?