Le Lun 12 mars 2007 17:19, seth vidal a écrit :
> I'm getting a little annoyed at this conversation.
>
> Apparently it is not acceptable for things to be not-working or
> less-good in rawhide. Apparently, we have to go from one working state
> to another perfectly working state w/o passing through any situation in
> which it is not as functional.
Seith,
There are enough unintentionnal failures in rawhide without piling up
intentionnal ones on them (plus we've passed F7T2 now). And
developper/tester respect goes both ways.
--
Nicolas Mailhot