Weird Request from Potential Employer

A web development job posting I recently came across had some special instructions to complete before sending your resume to them. They had a link to a web page with errors that they wanted enumerated in a Word document.

I think I would just point out the shortcomings of the markup and css and explain that I wouldn’t do anything about it until I knew what the end product was supposed to look like.
If they seriously expect you to second guess somebody else’s design then they are not a company I would like to work for.

send them a link to the 2 validators and say that is what is wrong with the page, then ask them, why on earth did they get a distraught bubbles to do the page? or was it a palistinian that done the page??? getting their own back… :o :D :lol:

They must have a properly coded page to compare any submissions against – and should have no problem giving you at least a screenshot of it. If they don’t have such a finished article, then I would start wondering whether they’re just trying to get work done for free.

The most I would do is give them a short paragraph, much like any that can be found throughout this forum, detailing briefly what’s wrong with the code (e.g. "you need to clear the float after div #X, etc.". I wouldn’t submit any actual coded solution unless I was sure they could actually do so themselves and were genuinely testing submissions.

Definately include the validator links though – at the very least it shows you know that code is supposed to validate properly!

If you can’t be bothered – who could?! Then just send them some wordy bs something like-

In my opinion the validation and substantiation of such a page would incur superfluous costs and would dissipate my own time in a gratuitous fashion. If you require a demonstration of my extensive skills in the validation and web-page design sector, please feel free to explore my portfolio at http://is-this-a-joke.com

Obviously you would replace the last URL with the location of you portfolio ;)

If you can’t be bothered – who could?! Then just send them some wordy bs something like-

In my opinion the validation and substantiation of such a page would incur superfluous costs and would dissipate my own time in a gratuitous fashion. If you require a demonstration of my extensive skills in the validation and web-page design sector, please feel free to explore my portfolio at http://is-this-a-joke.com

Obviously you would replace the last URL with the location of you portfolio ;)

I ended up writing them a short paragraph describing how messed up everything was and included a link to the html validation errors page (I neglected to send a link for the css because, frankly, after seeing the html results I didn’t have them stomach to even validate the css). I also said that I would be happy to list any errors and provide a solution if they would send me an image to go by.

why not start your own small business? to get you by in the mean time, this will help get you a portfolio, clients, money then a company will see how much you are doing and maybe take you on that way, maybe even a wordpress site to show some examples of code and a learning site…… oh my god I described CSS tricks

Well if that’s what they intended the website to look like then I suppose there are no errors. I’m not a mind reader so I can’t tell what they intended it to look like and therefore have no way of knowning if something is a bug or error.

It might be quite straightforward to fix all the validation errors and keep it looking the same. On the other hand I’m not entirely certain that’s what your client wants. *evil grin*

I think a few people have the wrong idea about what the employer was trying to do here.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe it was a simple test for each potential candidate to take. It wasn’t a page that needed fixing, nor was it them trying to get work done for free, it was simply a test to see the skills/capabilities of the people applying for the job.

Having said that, I do agree that it’s so far beyond repair I wouldn’t even bother. Unless it’s something tricky like just an extra } in the CSS markup. Sneaky sneaky.

Tips

What now? I have some ideas for you.

Go explore CodePen!

As a front end designer and developer, you should have an account on CodePen so you can save your snippets, present your ideas, and engage with other front end folk. I'd encourage you to go PRO as well, to unlock the full power of CodePen.

Get the newsletter!

You should sign up for the CSS-Tricks newsletter. It's a clean copy of all the blog posts each week, combined together, right to your inbox. If email isn't your thing, there is an RSS feed, iTunes, and lots of other ways to subscribe.

Listen to ShopTalk!

Subscribe to The Lodge!

The Lodge is a members-only, ad-free video learning area here on CSS-Tricks. Just like the free screencasts, but organized into four large complete series. Membership is also the #1 best way to support CSS-Tricks.

We can do the real footer now.

Site Links

Colophon

CSS-Tricks* is created, written by, and maintained by Chris Coyier. It is built on WordPress, hosted by Media Temple, and the assets are served by MaxCDN. The fonts are Source Sans and Source Code Pro. It is made possible by viewers like you who subscribe to The Lodge and through advertising for products and services I like.