Thursday night Nice was the victim of the latest attack by the Islamic State in France. However, the information provided by the media and the achievement of the facts themselves have caused sceptical voices that question the official view that, from the outset, was supported even by President François Hollande.

Indeed, events have alleged attack whose achievement is far from which the cell members who give their lives for Allah accustomed to perform. However, what had rushed to the most important personalities of the world to condemn an attack that, even, had been claimed by any terrorist group?

Mohamed Lahaie-Bouhlel, author of the slaughter that has claimed the lives of more than eighty people, was a French- Tunisian citizen no apparent ties to Islam. He was not a believer, and he does not belong to any cell and he had few vices that conflict with the obligations of good Muslim. However, under certain voices that have spoken about it, Bouhlel radicalized in just fifteen days, thus deciding act for Allah. The same voices that announce their radicalization have echoed the treachery murderer having spent ten days before the massacre in the same place, in an attempt to test the modus operandi. So five days it took him to become Muslim and to give his life.

The absence of explosives in achieving the killing and failure to take his life in the act or not having signed a statement before the murders in which effective surrender homage to the Islamic state – as do those who act in name of the organization- has complicated the possibility to clarify the true intentions of the author.

But these are not the only details that commit the official version. The Islamic State, like any other terrorist group, claimed the attacks so imminent once produced. It is part of the essence of them. Terror is the primary objective of any terrorist organization to carry out an attack. The delay of the organization in the claim of an event that such an impact was evident that its leaders were unaware of the intentions of his “brother” and weakens the possible link that the author had with those who now claim to be their “bosses”.

Finally, it should be noted the incongruity of the media to break the news. These, in the first place pointed to Al Nusra as those responsible for the radicalization of Bouhlel. However, Al-Nusra is a branch of Al Qaeda that is in direct conflict with the Islamic State. It is illogical that an attack is claimed by an enemy organization who has “formed” to the author in Islam.

But, if the fact that it was an attack what is false, what can motivate and assume that France denounces it as such? France, asserting itself on its status as state threatened by the global jihad, has extended the state of emergency in which it is plunged since the attacks last November. In addition, the achievement of attacks on its territory gives even more legitimacy, clinging to self-defense, declared a direct war to give shelter to the terrorists.

In short, neither the modus operandi nor the characteristics of the author show it as an attack rushed to warn the French president. In addition, the delay of the terrorist organization Islamic State in vindicate those who doubt support this argument. However, it seems that this is a debate that will remain unresolved.