If I had a bit more money (and I'm not talking huge amounts here) I'd start a school that hires only teachers that "have a past" like this one. We've seen 3 or 4 every year get "outed", so there's a nice population base out there.

I would so enjoy telling every helicopter parent who complains to "fark off, no refund". And if they sue? Even better. Now I have an excuse to embarrass the prudish, sexually disfunctional little whiners in public. The reporters would find that my lawyers don't utter the words "No comment".

And the annual "Teachers of" calender would be so hot... Only $15.99, pays for the whole thing.

MadHatter500:If I had a bit more money (and I'm not talking huge amounts here) I'd start a school that hires only teachers that "have a past" like this one. We've seen 3 or 4 every year get "outed", so there's a nice population base out there.

I would so enjoy telling every helicopter parent who complains to "fark off, no refund". And if they sue? Even better. Now I have an excuse to embarrass the prudish, sexually disfunctional little whiners in public. The reporters would find that my lawyers don't utter the words "No comment".

And the annual "Teachers of" calender would be so hot... Only $15.99, pays for the whole thing.

Because beautiful people who are paid for pictures of themselves with no clothes on is a risk to students how? Hell, at least in my case it would have increased attendance. Honestly though, from the pictures in the article she doesn't even look that incredible, she's just young and thin and willing to show some skin.

Not to be the wet blanket guys but how come none of these teachers read thier contracts? I don't know about Texas but in Missouri they have mortality clauses. Also her chest reminds me of two fried eggs.

Mid_mo_mad_man:Not to be the wet blanket guys but how come none of these teachers read thier contracts? I don't know about Texas but in Missouri they have mortality clauses. Also her chest reminds me of two fried eggs.

That's really about the only basis I can see for firing her. If she lied about this during the interview process, or was required to disclose it and didn't, the school may be within its rights to fire her. Otherwise, it's pretty crappy.

Mid_mo_mad_man:Not to be the wet blanket guys but how come none of these teachers read thier contracts? I don't know about Texas but in Missouri they have mortality clauses. Also her chest reminds me of two fried eggs.

Mid_mo_mad_man:Not to be the wet blanket guys but how come none of these teachers read thier contracts? I don't know about Texas but in Missouri they have mortality clauses. Also her chest reminds me of two fried eggs.

1) I assume you couldn't work if you were dead in any state and

2) Well that's just, like, your opinion, man. Don't be upset because your girl eats you out of house and home and you have to grease the doorway and tempt her with a twinkie just to get her to go outside.

Apos:Mid_mo_mad_man: Not to be the wet blanket guys but how come none of these teachers read thier contracts? I don't know about Texas but in Missouri they have mortality clauses. Also her chest reminds me of two fried eggs.

Yikes! And why?

Stupid unions always trying to protect their own by propping dead bodies against the chalkboard and expecting a paycheck.

Apos:Mid_mo_mad_man: Not to be the wet blanket guys but how come none of these teachers read thier contracts? I don't know about Texas but in Missouri they have mortality clauses. Also her chest reminds me of two fried eggs.

Yikes! And why?

Auto correct problem. A moral clause is what I meant to say. Unless your asking about the fried egg joke. That one you just have to thank about

Mid_mo_mad_man:Apos: Mid_mo_mad_man: Not to be the wet blanket guys but how come none of these teachers read thier contracts? I don't know about Texas but in Missouri they have mortality clauses. Also her chest reminds me of two fried eggs.

Yikes! And why?

Auto correct problem. A moral clause is what I meant to say. Unless your asking about the fried egg joke. That one you just have to think about

There was a local school teacher that was fired for posting a picture of herself drinking on Facebook. She was fired because "think of the children." Maybe it's just me, but the line between work and personal life seems to be getting thinner.

On one hand, I think emplyers should have the right to fire/not hire people for their activities outside of work if they're extreme. On the other hand, employees need some protection so you're not fired because you don't like chocolate milk and your boss does. Although, I can't say where exactly the line should be drawn.

DoomPaul:There was a local school teacher that was fired for posting a picture of herself drinking on Facebook. She was fired because "think of the children." Maybe it's just me, but the line between work and personal life seems to be getting thinner.

On one hand, I think emplyers should have the right to fire/not hire people for their activities outside of work if they're extreme. On the other hand, employees need some protection so you're not fired because you don't like chocolate milk and your boss does. Although, I can't say where exactly the line should be drawn.

It should be drawn after chocolate milk but before Yahoo and strawberry milk.

Better question. Why does someone have to be punished for their past when they didn't do anything illegal or wrong to begin with? So she made a few bucks showing off her boobs trying to get her modeling career kick started. BFD. A bunch of fat ugly soccer moms worried little Johnny might beat off while counting to 10 in Spanish. I can understand parents getting butt-hurt if an active teacher does something sexually provocative, but getting someone fired for doing nothing illegal when she was 18 trying to launch a career? I'd never get a job if I was held accountable for all the crap I did when I was 18 (I'm talking to you Lisa and Mary!).

walkerhound:Mid_mo_mad_man: Not to be the wet blanket guys but how come none of these teachers read thier contracts? I don't know about Texas but in Missouri they have mortality clauses. Also her chest reminds me of two fried eggs.

1) I assume you couldn't work if you were dead in any state and

2) Well that's just, like, your opinion, man. Don't be upset because your girl eats you out of house and home and you have to grease the doorway and tempt her with a twinkie just to get her to go outside.

I don't have to grease my wife. She's half Mexican. They are naturally greasy. I still perfer my bbw wife with her natural dd's and broad butt over this gal. She's built like a road in Kansas. Straight up and down with no curves in sight.

ole prophet:FTA:'Are her male 16- and 17-year-old students looking at her without picturing her nude?'

No. They would have thought about her nude regardless if the pictures existed or not.

Which is more important to these people, that their sons aren't picturing their hot female teacher nude, or that their sons aren't gay?

Hmmm, that could be a great tactic for students who want to prevent a hot female teacher from being fired: "I sort of thought I was gay, but then I was assigned to Ms. Hayek's class, and now I know I'm not!"

flondrix:ole prophet: FTA:'Are her male 16- and 17-year-old students looking at her without picturing her nude?'

No. They would have thought about her nude regardless if the pictures existed or not.

Which is more important to these people, that their sons aren't picturing their hot female teacher nude, or that their sons aren't gay?

Hmmm, that could be a great tactic for students who want to prevent a hot female teacher from being fired: "I sort of thought I was gay, but then I was assigned to Ms. Hayek's class, and now I know I'm not!"

You might be on to something here. At least in certain areas in the country.

The Muthaship:Mid_mo_mad_man: Not to be the wet blanket guys but how come none of these teachers read thier contracts? I don't know about Texas but in Missouri they have mortality clauses. Also her chest reminds me of two fried eggs.

That's really about the only basis I can see for firing her. If she lied about this during the interview process, or was required to disclose it and didn't, the school may be within its rights to fire her. Otherwise, it's pretty crappy.

It is Texas. I am going to assume the only basis they need to fire here is "because we want to".

Even a morality clause should not cover this. She was not affiliated with the school at the time. If she did it after being hired, sure then I would have no qualms over her being fired, espexially if she associated herself with the school.Unless they asked during her interview "did you ever have nude photographs published" and I seriously doubt they would ask that.

For actions before employment, the only thing that should matter are issues directly relevant to the safety of her students (such as child abuse) or her compentence (is she lied about her degree). Neither of which are the case here.