^ No. He is right. Pau should have been dealt right after that nixed trade fiasco.

Problem is it didn't makle sense to trade Gasol for anything that wasn't huge. Cause we'd have had to depend on guys like Murphy and Kapono and such and we saw how that panned out. Mitch wasdgonna replace that first and he did but he stayed loyal. Complain all we want 17 and 10 wasn't bad for a season playing out of position.

However THIS year is completelly different. He's gotten everything nearly he wants but can't seem to face the fact he isn't the same player. And questions the team strategy that won them 3 straight because he sat the 4th of ONE of those games!

His bad attitude, inability to back up his pre game talk and his "I"m a competitor but I'm not gonna go out there and EARN my spot back" attitude is what's hurting us AND our chemistry.

And oh yeah his lack of attempt of defense when Metta lead Beasley to him 3 times was laughable.

"Bryant had come to rage against the idea that Howard's clownish disposition could overtake the locker room, the Lakers' culture, and had warned Howard that he would never, ever let it happen."

So Memphis is now out of the question. The rumor about the Grizz being interested in pairing the two brothers up...no point now, since they've acquired Ed Davis.

Toronto is also going to be off our list as well, because Calderon is history, and they aren't trading Lowry (just brought in his good friend Rudy Gay, and pairing players that have great relationships together is what Colangelo does...see Calderon/Garbajosa, Bosh/Ford, and Bargnani/Belinelli). And thank the basketball gods for that, because I'd literally cry if we brought that defensive matador here (Bargs).

There really isn't much out there.

I am VERY confident that Josh Smith will be traded.

Pierce and Garnett aren't untouchable, and I wouldn't be shocked if LA and Boston actually call each other up, just to see where they stand.

Houston is coming off a bad month, Harden is slowing down, and they did show interest in Gasol last year...but they don't have much in salary to make something happen. They CAN absorb around $10 million, I believe, but they'd have to trade Harden, Lin, OR Asik (their three biggest contracts, at around $5-6 million right now) with another player, and there's no way they do that for Gasol.

I read that the Pacers would consider trading Granger for an expiring. He would do a better job at the three than Ron, that's for sure.

You always have Minnesota interested...pretty sure they would be as long as they have Rubio. It won't be for Love, though, even if he was healthy and on the block.

Philly won't take a big man from us ever again.

Sacramento could be intrigued, and I would love for them to give up a disgruntled Evans and Thomas Robinson (hope they already gave up on him), but that would probably draw a few laughs. Cousins won't be in LA, since we have Dwight (who is three times the player...Cousins is a waste of talent).

Finally, Utah is still hauling around four bigs, three that want more playing time...Millsap, Favors and Kanter (Jefferson the other big). There's no doubt I'd be interested in Millsap or Favors...but I see no reason for them to bring in Gasol, since he's also a big man who is already whining about his playing time.

Two GMs who spoke to Ric Bucher of 95.7 The Game believe there's "no chance" that Kevin Garnett plays the final two seasons of the three-year, $36MM contract he signed this past offseason (Sulia link). The executives believe the 36-year-old won't be able to coax any more out of his aging legs, and wouldn't want to hang around as an albatross to the Celtics. The GMs also aren't expecting any team to take him on in a trade, given his outsized salary, though only $6MM of his $12MM for 2014/15 is guaranteed.

Problem is it didn't makle sense to trade Gasol for anything that wasn't huge. Cause we'd have had to depend on guys like Murphy and Kapono and such and we saw how that panned out. Mitch wasdgonna replace that first and he did but he stayed loyal. Complain all we want 17 and 10 wasn't bad for a season playing out of position.

However THIS year is completelly different. He's gotten everything nearly he wants but can't seem to face the fact he isn't the same player. And questions the team strategy that won them 3 straight because he sat the 4th of ONE of those games!

His bad attitude, inability to back up his pre game talk and his "I"m a competitor but I'm not gonna go out there and EARN my spot back" attitude is what's hurting us AND our chemistry.

And oh yeah his lack of attempt of defense when Metta lead Beasley to him 3 times was laughable.

We had a package of Luis Scola + Kevin Martin and Goran Dragic in front of us and we didn't even look at it.

The Celtics and Lakers really should give each other a phone call, even though they're rivals. I think both teams would agree that it's preferrable to hate each other in the finals, rather than both being out of the playoffs and both teams actually have pieces that could complement each other.
Green, Lee and either Bradley or Sullinger for Gasol and fillers could be interesting to look at. The problem is taking on salary going forward, but i think it could be worth it. If Howard is healthy, Green, Lee and Bradley/Sullinger would fit right into our system (better than Pau) and we could make a late push. If Howard isn't healthy, why not try to get some pieces we can use in the future in a D'Antoni system.
Nash-Kobe-Clark-Green-Howard, with Meeks-Lee-Metta-Sullinger/Bradley as the main guys off the bench, would be fun.

For the Celtics, it comes down to whether they belive there is a chance of another run. If they got Pau and unloaded Green and Lee, they could move KG to the 4, and still have a few good pieces - especially if they moved Rondo for a young prospect (Perhaps for Tyreke Evans and Isaiah Thomas). In two years, all the old-timers would come off the books.