Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization

Abstract

This article describes an emergent logic of accumulation in the networked sphere, ‘surveillance capitalism,’ and considers its implications for ‘information civilization.’ The institutionalizing practices and operational assumptions of Google Inc. are the primary lens for this analysis as they are rendered in two recent articles authored by Google Chief Economist Hal Varian. Varian asserts four uses that follow from computer-mediated transactions: ‘data extraction and analysis,’ ‘new contractual forms due to better monitoring,’ ‘personalization and customization,’ and ‘continuous experiments.’ An examination of the nature and consequences of these uses sheds light on the implicit logic of surveillance capitalism and the global architecture of computer mediation upon which it depends. This architecture produces a distributed and largely uncontested new expression of power that I christen: ‘Big Other.’ It is constituted by unexpected and often illegible mechanisms of extraction, commodification, and control that effectively exile persons from their own behavior while producing new markets of behavioral prediction and modification. Surveillance capitalism challenges democratic norms and departs in key ways from the centuries-long evolution of market capitalism.

boyd, danah and Crawford, K. (2011). Six provocations for big data. Presented at the A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society, Oxford Internet Institute. [WWW document] http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1926431.

Hilbert, M. (2013). Technological Information Inequality As an Incessantly Moving Target: The redistribution of information and communication capacities between 1986 and 2010, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 65 (4): 821–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoofnagle, C.J., King, J., Li, S. and Turow, J. (2010). How different are young adults from older adults when it comes to information privacy attitudes and policies? SSRN Electronic Journal [WWW document] http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1589864.

Jammet, A. (2014). The Evolution of EU Law on the Protection of Personal Data, Center for European Law and Legal Studies 3 (6): 1–18.Google Scholar

Schwartz, P. (1989). The Computer in German and American Constitutional Law: Towards an American right of informational self-determination, American Journal of Comparative Law 37 (4): 675–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weatherill, L. (1993). The Meaning of Consumer Behavior in the Seventeenth and Early Eighteenth-Century England, in J. Brewer and R. Porter (eds.) Consumption and the World of Goods, London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar