Last signatures

Dominik Leipold,
Germany,
04 Mar 2018 08:49Comments: I once had to spend days of publicly funded working time trying to implement some bits of the OOXML specification – things that take mere minutes when using other open formats.

Lyubomir Krastev,
Bulgaria,
20 Jun 2012 12:42Comments: Same-purpose software products should be able to use each other's document output without any issues. Interoperability rifts caused by closed formats and non-compliance to specification MUST NOT EXIST in this age of user choice and standardization. Say NO to vendor lock-in.

Ethan Wheeler,
United Kingdom,
03 Jun 2012 12:17Comments: The ISO exist to create standards, not advocate vendor lock-in: the standardisation of OOXML would not help with their mission, but would instead hold them back in achieving it.

F. Faure,
France,
25 May 2012 13:57

Nicole Sigaud,
Brazil,
21 May 2012 15:07Comments: ISO group cannot bow to MS, this is immoral and certainly will stain forever ISO's credibility

Christian Zerbst,
Spain,
09 May 2012 16:14

Simon Heimbach,
Germany,
09 May 2012 09:07

Denis Haine,
Canada,
08 May 2012 13:28

David Ayers,
Austria,
02 May 2012 10:41Comments: If ODF doesn't meet the criteria needed to store someones Office implementation, then that some needs to take part in the ODF definition instead of undermining the integrity of an international Standards-Body by unilaterally defining their own standard.

Fatih Tosun,
Turkey,
26 Feb 2012 16:01Comments: Consider o spessific brand of bottled water is the standard. And you will have problems to drink tap water. Standardisation benefits for the people. Not for companies.

Bugra Abdullahoglu,
Turkey,
25 Sep 2011 12:57Comments: Don't make your customers hate you. You know, you now have a huge competitor. You don't wanna lose customers to Apple because of doing such stupid things to make just a bit more money.