THE
United States is abandoning its role as the global champion of human rights.

Revelations that top officials are targeting
people to be assassinated abroad, including American citizens, are only the
most recent, disturbing proof of how far our nations violation of human rights
has extended. This development began after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11,
2001, and has been sanctioned and escalated by bipartisan executive and
legislative actions, without dissent from the general public. As a result, our
country can no longer speak with moral authority on these critical issues.

While the
country has made mistakes in the past, the widespread abuse of human rights
over the last decade has been a dramatic change from the past. With leadership
from the United States, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was
adopted in 1948 as the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.
This was a bold and clear commitment that power would no longer serve as a
cover to oppress or injure people, and it established equal rights of all
people to life, liberty, security of person, equal protection of the law and
freedom from torture, arbitrary detention or forced exile.

The
declaration has been invoked by human rights activists and the international
community to replace most of the worlds dictatorships with democracies and to
promote the rule of law in domestic and global affairs. It is disturbing that,
instead of strengthening these principles, our governments counterterrorism
policies are now clearly violating at least 10 of the declarations 30
articles, including the prohibition against cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment.

Recent
legislation has made legal the presidents right to detain a person
indefinitely on suspicion of affiliation with terrorist organizations or
associated forces, a broad, vague power that can be abused without meaningful
oversight from the courts or Congress (the law is currently being blocked by a
federal judge). This law violates the right to freedom of expression and to be
presumed innocent until proved guilty, two other rights enshrined in the
declaration.

In
addition to American citizens being targeted for assassination or indefinite
detention, recent laws have canceled the restraints in the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to allow unprecedented violations of our
rights to privacy through warrantless wiretapping and government mining of our
electronic communications. Popular state laws permit detaining individuals
because of their appearance, where they worship or with whom they associate.

Despite
an arbitrary rule that any man killed by drones is declared an enemy terrorist,
the death of nearby innocent women and children is accepted as inevitable.
After more than 30 airstrikes on civilian homes this year in Afghanistan,
President Hamid Karzai has demanded that such attacks end, but the practice
continues in areas of Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen that are not in any war zone.
We dont know how many hundreds of innocent civilians have been killed in these
attacks, each one approved by the highest authorities in Washington. This would
have been unthinkable in previous times.

These
policies clearly affect American foreign policy. Top intelligence and military
officials, as well as rights defenders in targeted areas, affirm that the great
escalation in drone attacks has turned aggrieved families toward terrorist
organizations, aroused civilian populations against us and permitted repressive
governments to cite such actions to justify their own despotic behavior.

Meanwhile,
the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, now houses 169
prisoners. About half have been cleared for release, yet have little prospect
of ever obtaining their freedom. American authorities have revealed that, in
order to obtain confessions, some of the few being tried (only in military
courts) have been tortured by waterboarding more than 100 times or intimidated
with semiautomatic weapons, power drills or threats to sexually assault their
mothers. Astoundingly, these facts cannot be used as a defense by the accused,
because the government claims they occurred under the cover of national
security. Most of the other prisoners have no prospect of ever being charged
or tried either.

At a time
when popular revolutions are sweeping the globe, the United States should be
strengthening, not weakening, basic rules of law and principles of justice
enumerated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. But instead of making
the world safer, Americas violation of international human rights abets our
enemies and alienates our friends.

As
concerned citizens, we must persuade Washington to reverse course and regain
moral leadership according to international human rights norms that we had
officially adopted as our own and cherished throughout the years.

Jimmy Carter, the 39th president, is the
founder of the Carter Center and the recipient of the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize.