| Reply | Permalink matthew weaver - i've always thought that it was bad enough that each time you post here, you force people to look at you in that ridiculous shower cap. but i must say that reading the content of your posts is much more disturbing than your need to inundate complete strangers with pictures of you and two newborns. question: what is the scenario that plays out in your mind (the one covered by your Jeri-curl rag) that gives hillary the nomination? apparently, in the carefully-constructed fantasy land of the paranoid clintonite mob, the superdelegates (most of whom are white) are going to look democratic voters in their eyes and say, "well, those WERE the rules, but hillary and hillbilly have convinced us that the voters made the wrong choice. we have therefore corrected this mistake and will be going forward." doesn't that strike you as oddly reminiscent of kissinger's explanation for the assassination of allende?

| Reply | Permalink support for graham would extend to everyone put off by O's "lack of experience", also help antiwar folks feel like they're included. as far as rendell, PA seems contested also, so there's 2 states to start. i know rendell's support comes from philly and pittsburgh, but still he might help with joe (white) sixpack. also, rendell's a clintonite of sorts, might help with hillary supporters. ditto for clark, who singlehandedly demolishes mcCain's advantage on millitary issues, also opposed to the war. though that valedictorian thing probably won't help, alas.