Air travel to Cuba divides Congress

Commercial flights to Cuba resumed for the first time in 50 years this
week, but don’t expect a flood of legislative changes to follow.

Proponents of further loosening travel restrictions on Cuba had hoped
that the resumption of air service with the country would give them new
momentum.

In the Senate, appropriators have already approved an amendment that
would lift the tourism ban with Cuba, while similar legislation has
garnered over 50 cosponsors.
But over in the House, advocates still face fierce opposition from the
majority on the Homeland Security Committee, which is pushing a bill
that would ground flights to Cuba until a thorough airport security
review is conducted.

“Despite continued concerns about the safety and security of Cuba’s
airports, the Administration rushed resuming regularly scheduled
commercial flights to Cuba — again putting security concerns far behind
the President’s legacy building effort,” Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas),
the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, told The Hill in
a statement.

“Once Congress is back in session, I plan to move legislation through my
Homeland Security Committee to force DHS and GAO to both identify and
close any and all of the major security gaps that currently exist.”

Critics of travel to Cuba say they don’t plan to back down just because
flights to the island are underway.

The stalemate is unlikely to yield any legislative changes this year on
travel to Cuba, an issue that has divided lawmakers for more than five
decades.

“Does [resuming air service with Cuba] potentially increase the
conversation? Yes,” said John S. Kavulich, president of the U.S.-Cuba
Trade and Economic Council, Inc. “But does it change the outcome? No.”

The Obama administration announced a historic agreement earlier this
year to re-establish scheduled air service between the U.S. and Cuba.

The first U.S. flight touched down in Santa Clara, Cuba, on Wednesday
morning. The arrival was widely seen as a milestone in President Obama’s
push to normalize diplomatic relations with the former Cold War rival.

But American tourism on the island is still prohibited and can only be
approved by Congress.

The new flight routes will only open up travel for family visits,
official U.S. government business, foreign governments, journalistic
activity, professional research, educational activities, religious
activities, public performances, humanitarian projects and certain
authorized export transactions.

James Williams, president of Engage Cuba, believes it’s only a matter of
time before the travel ban is fully lifted.

“I think it will add more momentum than anything we could have done,”
Williams said. “The more Americans are going to Cuba, the more people
are seeing and experiencing it, and the more they will see that the
travel ban is outdated.”

Perhaps more importantly, Williams expects the airline industry to begin
putting lobbying and advocacy muscle behind the issue, now that they
have a number of daily commercial flights to Cuba that they want to fill.

“After the initial few months of curiosity, I think they’re going to
have a hard time sustaining them without the travel ban being lifted,”
he said.

There is some evidence that the GOP may be warming to the idea of
allowing tourism to Cuba.

The Senate Appropriations Committee adopted an amendment by voice vote
to the fiscal 2017 spending bill for financial services and general
government that would lift the travel ban.

A standalone measure from Sens. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and Jerry
Moran (R-Kan.) also would lift the Cuban travel restrictions. It has
garnered 51 cosponsors.

And companion legislation in the House from Rep. Mark Sanford (R-S.C.)
has 130 cosponsors.

“With U.S. airlines now poised to unleash the power of American
travelers and their frequent flier miles, the time has come for Congress
to eliminate the archaic restrictions on U.S. travel to Cuba,” Flake
state in a statement.

But there is still staunch opposition from prominent lawmakers such as
Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who argue the travel
would enrich the Castro government despite its history of human rights
abuses.

Meanwhile, a group of House lawmakers say they still don’t know whether
Cuba’s airport security is up to snuff. They want to know whether the
island has adequate body scanners, explosive detection systems,
technology for detecting fake passports and strong employee vetting process.

They are pushing legislation that would halt Cuba flights until the
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) conducts a thorough review
of the security measures in place at all of Cuba’s 10 airports.

The measure, which is backed by Rep. John Katko (R-N.Y.), chairman of
the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Transportation Security,
also would require an agreement that allows TSA agents to inspect Cuban
airports, while permitting federal air marshals on flights between the
U.S. and Cuba.

The TSA did announce an agreement with Cuba last month that will allow
federal air marshals to be on board certain flights to and from Cuba.

But bill sponsors say they are still alarmed because the country’s
airports only meet international standards, not American ones. They plan
to keep pressing on the issue when they return from the August recess.

“The facts remain the same — we still don’t know if Cuban airports have
the proper screening and explosive detection, if they have the ability
to check for fake passports or IDs, and how or if they vet airport
workers,” bill sponsor Richard Hudson (R-N.C.) said in a statement to
The Hill.

Kavulich of the U.S.-Cuba Trade and Economic Council says advocates of
Cuban travel should focus on regulatory changes that could be made in
the remaining days of the Obama administration, instead of focusing on
legislation that is unlikely to pass the Republican-led Congress.

It’s been nearly 16 years since the last Cuba-related legislation was
signed into law, Kavulich pointed out.

Kavulich also said that working to alleviate some of the concerns of
opponents — such as ensuring federal air marshals are on planes — can
help thread the needle on Cuban air travel.

“You take away a little bit of the fangs,” he said. “You don’t solve the
problem, but you lesson [the argument’s] viability.”

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.