I can’t put my finger on it, but I have this nagging feeling that Senator Dianne Feinstein’s assault weapons ban is not gone. My paranoia tells me the democrats are going to squeeze it through a “back door” somehow.

“I was so naive,” said one educator from central Ohio who preferred to remain anonymous. “I came here thinking that all these mass school murders could be stopped if we passed a few new laws. But now I realize that won’t help at all. And we have to get serious about making our schools safe and stop playing politics.”

I can’t put my finger on it, but I have this nagging feeling that Senator Dianne Feinstein’s assault weapons ban is not gone. My paranoia tells me the democrats are going to squeeze it through a “back door” somehow.

Another ‘Union’ headed by a greedy pig.. $287,386 in ‘compensation’? For what? Being and assO?

PA Big Labor Boss Bullies Job Creators

During a press conference in support of privatizing Pennsylvania’s liquor stores, Big Labor Boss Wendell W. Young, repeatedly shouted and interrupted speakers at the podium. Young, who received $287,386 in compensation last year, is the Local 1776 representative for United Food and Commercial Workers, which represents many of Pennsylvania’s liquor store employees.

Of course it was ‘Party Line Voting‘!! Is how they work…the only time any of those assO don’t vote party line when their is some ‘personal gain’! And for the Dhimmicraps…They are completely lost as a reasonable Party…

Mark Kelly’s campaign against “assault weapons” such as the AR-15 rifle has sparked a local backlash against his wife Gabby Giffords…

___

The Land of the Not-So-Much-Free

The USA is not the least free country in the world. But it is becoming increasingly obvious to everyone that it isnít even close to being the most free country in the world that many Americans have always assumed it be …

Today, the Nut-Left Democrats on the Senate Judiciary voted to report the Feinstein gun ban –which could ban between 50% and 80% of guns and magazines in circulation today. It may not even get a majority in the Senate – much less the 60 votes needed to pass. And it is being pushed primarily to allow anti-gun Democrats from pro-gun states to pretend to be pro-gun.

Tuesday, the Judiciary Committee passed, by a 10-to-8 vote, the universal gun registry bill. Chief sponsor Chuck Schumer has been unable to achieve Republican support from anyone other than the anti-gun Illinois Republican Mark Kirk. Therefore, unless another Republican sells out at the last minute, we believe we can successfully filibuster this ill in the full Senate.

Tuesday, by a vote of 14-to-4, the Judiciary Committee also reported a Boxer bill that would increase, by $10 million, the funding for an existing school safety program. The money could be used for armed guards, as the NRA proposes, or it could be used for an anti-gun study. It is therefore neither inherently “pro-gun’ nor “anti-gun.” We have said we would oppose proceeding to Boxer if it is a vehicle for votes on other anti-gun measures – but that we would not object to its passage, without amendment, by “unanimous consent.”

This brings us to the central battlefield: Last week, the committee reported, by a vote of 11-to-7, the Veterans Gun Ban, S. 54. The lone GOP vote in favor came from Chuck Grassley, who indicated he would oppose the bill on the Senate floor unless it was improved from the committee-reported version.

As we see it, the chief strategic objective is now to keep gun control votes from coming to the Senate floor by opposing the “motion to proceed” to any bill which is going to be used as a vehicle for gun votes.

That would certainly mean that senators should oppose moving to proceed to universal gun registries or the Veterans Gun Ban. But it also means that we oppose moving to proceed to so-called non-controversial bills, such as Boxer, if those bills are being brought up as a vehicle for anti-gun amendments.

ACTION: Contact your senator. Ask him to oppose any motion to proceed – by filibuster if necessary – to the Feinstein gun ban, the universal gun registry bill, the Veterans Gun Ban (S. 54), or to any other piece of legislation being brought up as a vehicle for votes on these anti-gun proposals.

New Pope Francis I is an ardent opponent of same-sex marriage, in coincidence with traditional Catholic belief. In 2010, he wrote, “Let’s not be naïve, we’re not talking about a simple political battle; it is […] … READ MORE

The result was that 96% of the respondents opposed “Obama’s universal
background checks.”

This is particularly interesting because the polls purporting to show
widespread support for this component of gun control also claim to show
that 85% of hard-core gun rights members support it as well. Clearly,
this is not the case, and that casts serious doubt on the other results as
well.

Let me suggest the following explanations for the bogus results
“mainstream” polls are getting:

* It makes a difference whether the pollster lays a seductive “trail of
breadcrumbs” to produce a positive result. Many Americans erroneously
believe that “universal background checks,” when worded that way, merely
reflect a greater enforcement of the status quo.

* It certainly makes a difference what part of the country is polled. The
fact that 99.99999% of residents of Manhattan and San Francisco support
this framework for a national gun registry may not make much of a
difference in Arkansas, Montana, or South Dakota.

When Americans learn that Obama’s proposed “universal background checks”
will result in a ban on private sales of firearms (without prior
government approval) or create the framework for a gun registry, then gun
owners overwhelmingly oppose them.

As a result of all of this, I am asking you to vote against the Motion to
Proceed to any gun control bill reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Even if the framework for a national gun registry (as the ATF increasingly
copies all of the information on 4473’s) were the only proposal on the
table, the package expected to be reported from Senator Leahy’s Judiciary
Committee would be bad enough.

But, in addition, support for consideration of Leahy’s gun bill is also
support for a “hornet’s nest” of other politically-motivated votes on gun
bans, magazine bans, “watch list bans,” and so forth. So don’t think you
can vote to proceed to this abomination, vote against Feinstein, and
satisfy gun owners in the process.

Know that gun owners will consider votes relating to the motion to proceed
as pivotal votes, and will consider the throwaway “no” vote on Feinstein
as nothing more than a phony attempt to seize political cover.

"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws." -Ayn Rand in Atlas Shrugged

Manage this bugger!

Spam Blocked

“A nation that is ignorant of its past, is a nation that is ripe for deception and manipulation. Therefore, it is not what happened, but rather what people believe happened which determines the present actions of a nation.” ~ Warriors of Honor