With a short trackrecord Pf and DScore can be more volatile, I never said DScore is the holy grail, but I can say it is much better than classical return and drawdown.You are confirming the importance of Ex With a small sample all the scores are unreliable.BTW Ex isn't a coefficient, it is used as a cap : with Ex 5 your max DScore is 50 .

Hello! I am sure, this question has been asked, but I can´t find it...?I am very happy with the performance of my strategies, but very unhappy with my D-scores.Although i don´t see a need, to change my strategies, I´d like to improve my investable attributes.Is there something like a "How To", that explains, what to do, to improve the single attributes?What annoys me the most, is the incredible low "Ex" on my Darwin NIB , which doesn´t move a bit. Or did it even just fall?I know the description of the attributes, but they don´t help me.Thanks!

Thx guys! Yes, i will not change a working strategy, the more, as my Darwin is the exact mirror of my trading I do in my main account. And I´ve seen, that even minor changes can have desastrous consequences..Ex as D-score cap... That´s really valuable info! So i will just keep on doing what I do...

Sometimes I think Darwinex has stil a lot of room for improvements. D-Score is probably the core of the whole Darwinex system. When I see examples like the one I am about to mention, I believe it is important to work on it asap.

Let´s take darwin FOF, it is a 14 months darwin. On April 16th 2018 its D-Score was 44, only 17 days later it was 72

I understnd its performance changed a lot in these days, but we are talking about the MAIN tool investors should consider to qualify a darwin? If D-Score is so volatil, how can we trust in it? I don´t think this darwin was so bad two weeks ago, I don´t think it is so good now just because a couple of great or lucky days...

I am a big fan of Darwinex system, and I want to believe in the D-Score. I´ve been told many times that it is proven the higher D-Score the higher probability of good results. So, what D-Score should I have to qualify this darwin, 44 or 72? We are talking about the same darwin, and only a few days are separating one score from the other.

Darwinex staff, does it make sense to you? @CavaliereVerde I know you are also a big fan of D-Score (as I am too), what´s your thinking about it?

For my opinion D-Score 72 is too high for this Darwin.D-Score 44 was with a profit of less than 3 % increasing his max. DD significantly until April 16th, now it is more than 25 % profit, but with a max. DD of nearly 25 % increased less than 4 weeks ago.I could accept it more if the Darwin would be more than 2 years old, but also his current DarwinIA ranking of 3 shows that DarwinIA is not a good template for investing, as it never was.

I don't have any objections against this Darwin, and the recovery is great, but the recvery of the evaluation on D-Score is too fast.

Fully agree, because they are only looking for patterns as described and not for consistency.

FOF had won its DarwinIA allocation of 70k in November 2017 with a D-Score less than 70 and a profit record of less than 6 %. I don't remember whether November was a tough or an easy month, but I'm sure it happened in line with the old rules.

If it is really wanted to reward recovery with a high bonus this way without regarding recent DD, it is okay. But when I'm looking at this example chart, recent max. DD is not evaluated and a profit/DD ratio is also ignored because of the increased DD it must still be less than in November last year. I'm sure I'm not the only investor looking at these figures besides D-Score an IAs.

Edit: and if you look at the trading account of current no. 2, the Darwinex risk manager did a really great job ..

No, if you always watch the last two years Manipulation is only possible before migration, that's another point ..

Low DD in last 2 years: maybe 3 out of 3.000 DarwinsHigh past DD last 2 years: maybe 3 % are working for a lower future DD

Increasing Profit/DD ratio over last 2 years: trader is working successful on a reasonable Profit/DD structure, not a lucky trader in the good moment and helpless during the bad days Unfortunaltely that is not documented

Yes, with a Consistency atribute the D-Score volatility could be reduced. As @Journalist has said you can not trust Darwinia like a guide to invest right now. But I am not sure what is Darwinex looking for with Darwinia (beyond motivate and reward good monthly performance of loyal darwins).

There is a new D-Score just implemented yesterday, hopefully it works better. Otherwise Consistency atribute could be a solution, or averaging the last three months...could be a solution too.

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 73 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.