After analyzing the data from the ACCORD study including data from a few years of follow-up, the researchers concluded that lowering A1c resulted in fewer heart attacks, revascularizations (i.e. coronary bypass operations or placements of stents), and unstable angina. The researchers summarized their findings saying,

"Raised glucose concentration is a modifiable risk factor for ischaemic heart disease in middle-aged people with type 2 diabetes and other cardiovascular risk factors." This means you can change that risk by lowering your blood sugar.

You did not see this paper reported in your newspaper, and it is possible your doctor won't see it in his diabetes-related newsletter, either, because it doesn't sound like major news.

But it is very major news, because ACCORD study was the study that, when it was first published in 2008, was interpreted as showing that lowering A1c was dangerous. This was because slightly more people in the "intensive intervention" arm died of heart attacks than did people in the arm of the study who didn't strive to get A1cs of 6.5% or better.

As we blogged years ago, this original conclusion--that lowering A1c could prove fatal--turned out to be a classic case of poor data analysis. It turned out that the people in the "intervention arm" of the study who had those excess heart attacks were people who though they were were supposed to be lowering their blood sugar had not done so.

Now, as you would expect, better analysis of the ACCORD data shows that lowering blood sugar most definitely does improve cardiovascular health. This is exactly what we would expect to find, as there is plenty of other evidence from unrelated studies that as A1c rises out of the 5% range the risk for cardiovascular disease starts to rise steeply. You can read summaries of many of these studies HERE.

But the tragedy here is that, back in 2008, endocrinologists who should have known better took the original ACCORD report to mean that lowering your blood sugar below 6.5% is dangerous. And because fo this belief, they actually discouraged their patients from lowering their blood sugars to the levels that it turns out would have protected them from harm.

This is now a huge problem people face when asking doctors to help them achieve tighter control. I have heard from several people with diabetes who have been censured by their doctors for achieving A1cs below 6.5%. I have also heard from others who were refused treatment that could lower A1cs of 7.0% and post meal numbers shooting into the 200 mg/dl range after meals because their doctors believed that intensive lowering of any kind would be dangerous.

If you fall into this category, or if you are not getting the support you need from your doctor to help you achieve a better blood sugar result, print out the abstract of the Lancet article above and bring it to your next doctor appointment.

Just remember that it isn't enough to lower your blood sugar. You have to do it using dietary approaches and drugs that have a long track record of safety. Cutting carbs works for most people and has been shown to be safe. But right now, only a few diabetes drugs that stand up to my rigorous standards for safety. They are:

metformin
acarbose
gliclazide (not available in the U.S.)
repaglinide
insulin

Other drugs like Glyburide, Januvia, Byetta, Actos, and Invokana, along with the many other drugs in the families as these drugs may be very effective for lowering blood sugar, but they lower blood sugar using mechanisms that may over a long period of time harm your body. Januvia and Byetta appear to cause pancreatitis, and may raise the risk of cancer, and alter the immune system. The sulfonylurea drugs like glyburide, glipizide, and glibenclamide stimulate a heart receptor and increase the risk of heart attack. The drugs like Actos raise the risk of heart failure and osteoporosis. Invokana and related drugs cause urinary tract infections and may cause cancer.

You can learn more about the specific safety issues of the many drugs now prescribed for diabetes at the Drugs page of the main Blood Sugar 101 web site.

So stick to the safe drugs and dietary interventions to lower your blood sugar to as normal a level as you can attain. Ideally an A1c near 5% is best, but many of us can't achieve them. (I sure can't!) A1cs anywhere in the 5% range are a huge improvement and should give most of us normal health. Keeping your blood sugar under 140 mg/dl as much as possible at all times no matter what your A1c is probably the very best way to protect your arteries and avoid heart disease.

November 19, 2014

Quite a few people have commented that my full-length book, Diet 101: The Truth About Low Carb Diets gives them more information about the science and studies backing up low carb diets than they want to read.

So for those dieters, I have put together an action-oriented, just-the-facts, Kindle short read that concentrates on the main problems low carb dieters encounter and explains how to solve them. It is designed to be read in roughly an hour.

If you already have Diet 101, you don't need this new book. But if you know people who might benefit from a simpler, less technical discussion of the many issues that arise when people try to diet on low carb diets, let them know about this new book. They'll find it helpful!

This brief booklet presents the absolutely basic, essential information people with diabetes need to know. It explains what causes diabetes, what blood sugar levels cause heart disease and complications, what raises blood sugar, how to lower blood sugar using a blood sugar meter and the Test, Test, Test strategy, and what to do if that strategy doesn't give you normal blood sugars.

I have priced it so that it competes with a cup of premium coffee, hoping that this e will make it possible to reach people who don't know how to Google the web site and can't afford the the full-length Blood Sugar 101, book.
I have also published it exclusively on Amazon so that it can be read for free by subscribers to Kindle Unlimited.

June 28, 2014

Yesterday after many years of delay, the FDA finally approved Afrezza, a new inhaled insulin.

I have been following news about this insulin for a while as quite a few of the claims made for it were very exciting, most notably that it is an ultra-fast insulin that reaches the bloodstream within 15 minutes. If this was true, that would make it capable of replacing first phase insulin, something that would revolutionize our ability to control blood sugars.

It was also said that unlike Exubera, the inhalable insulin that was approved in 2006 and taken off the market a year later, the many years of testing the FDA insisted on for Afrezza has shown that it does not harm the lungs.

Also, from a cosmetic standpoint, unlike the case with Exubera's inhaler, the Afrezza inhaler is a small, whistle-like object easily carried in the pocket and discreetly used.

Even setting aside the improved activity curve of Afrezza, an inhalable insulin that worked just as well as the injected insulins would have the advantage of appealing to the huge number of people with Type 2 whose fear of needles causes them to put off using insulin until long after it would have made any difference in their health. It would also be wonderful if children with diabetes did not have to inject themselves.

Though the needle phobia angle has been overemphasized as a benefit of Afrezza. Those of us who have injected insulin have found that it is not the big, scary deal non-insulin users assume it is. The needles, when prescribed in the right size and ultra thin gauge are painless. (If yours aren't you talk to your doctor about why you aren't using the ultra thin needles and the shortest needle compatible with your level of body fat.) So if we have gotten injected insulin working properly, the only reason we would want to switch to Afrezza would be if it was not only easy to administer, but as effective as the insulin we have been using.

The Real Activity Curve
According to the PI, while Afrezza does reach the bloodstream within 15 minutes, it does not become active until about 53 minutes after it is taken. This is very similar to the currently injected insulins, and at first, the graph shown in the PI made me question whether it truly is an ultra fast insulin.

However, where it differs is the speed with which it stops acting. Where Humalog (or Novolog) don't start working for about the same 53 minutes, once they start working, their concentration in the bloodstream rises for another hour and then only gradually drifts back down, taking 4.5 hours to reach the level that Afrezza reaches in 2.5 hours. This means that Afrezza is much less likely to produce hypos or the hunger that near hypos can cause.

You can see the curve for the activity of Afrezza compared to Humalog in chart A and the concentration in the blood of Chart B below. Take a look at it. We will be discussing it further later on.

Limited Dose Sizes

The second thing I noted when I read the PI was that Afrezza is only available in limted dose sizes all of which are at strengths which are equivalent to multiples of 4 units of Humalog. The avialable doses are 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 untis.

Seeing this, I thought. Damn! Four units of insulin is a LOT of insulin for someone who is insulin sensitive. This means the only Type 1s who can use this are those slurping down large non-diet Cokes with each meal. And of course, with such limited dose choices, there is no way to match this stuff to your carb intake, which is the proper way to use fast-acting insulin.

However, after some thought, and after looking at the activity curve again I had a flash of insight. With that much, much shorter activity curve, and with the way that the insulin peaks very fast 1 hour after eating--which is when the bulk of the carbs from your food hit your bloodstream, it looks like you could use a much larger dose of Afrezza, get a much more powerful surge of insulin just as you got that high from the food, and then, because it drops so fast, clean up the bit of food left at two hours, and be done with your insulin without the hypo problems that the much bigger dose of insulin would cause if it were the much slower to peak and much slower to exit injected insulin.

So with that in mind, it struck me that the 4 unit equivalent might very well be suitable for someone insulin sensitive who usually uses 2 units to cover a meal.

I would love to get my hands on this stuff to give it a try, though because of the dose equivalence and my insulin sensitivity, I would have to test it against a big bowl of Pad Thai (2 OGTTs in one bowl!) . However, that isn't likely to happen. But if you do end up being able to try a sample, I'd love it if you could send me a graph of your blood sugars after using it and a comparison to how you do with an injected insuiln at the same carb intake. With data like that perhaps we can start putting together some useful information about how this stuff really works when used by people who understand how to use insulin.

Wretched Results for Type 2s--But Not Because Afrezza Sucks

The table showing how Afrezza performed in people with Type 2 diabetes induced the same sadness, and disgust with doctors' stupidity as most drug data does, because as usual, the drug was tested in people who started with horrendously awful blood sugars and then took a drug in a way that left them with only slightly less horrendous blood sugars--ones that would still damage retinas, nerves, and kidneys. You can see this data below:

These patients started out with mean fasting blood sugars of 175.9 mg/dl and ended up with mean fasting blood sugars of 164.7 mg/dl. Why? Because the idiots who treat these patients had them on oral drugs only, and gve them no basal insulin, which looking at those fasting blood sugars they needed very badly.

My guess is that these patients were not given much help in learning how to use this insulin in a way that bore some relationship to the carbs they were eating. If they were just told to take the same dose at every meal, the chances were it was too small a dose to do much to control their blood sugars after meals. The lack of any graphs showing these patients' blood sugars after meals is telling.

So my conclusion from all this is that we have no data here that tells us how Afrezza would perform if it were used properly--with a basal insulin--and dosed to have some kind of relationship to the person's carb intake. But at the same time, my conclusion is that this is probably how the PCPs who treat so many people with Type 2 diabetes would dose Afrezza. So it probably gives us a good idea of how well it will work in the real world--which is not as well as injected insulin, based on other charts provided in the PI.

But the problem here isn't with Afrezza, but with the fact that injected insulin, because it lasts for up to 5.5 hours, is also providing quite a bit of basal coverage for these people with the extremely high blood sugars. If endocrinologists are able to prescribe basal insulins in appropriate doses along with Afrezza, and use Afrezza strictly to cover meals, it might show much better results.

But if busy doctors just prescribe generic doses of Afrezza too low to cover meals, along with two or three ineffective oral drugs and no basal insulin, Afrezza may end up looking like a failed drug, and the lesson patients may get is "insulin doesn't work." I hope that doesn't happen.

Side Effects
The main side effect of Afrezza is cough, which is called "bronchiospasm" which is an intense cough. The data presented to the FDA before approval suggests that most patients cough a little bit when they start this stuff and then it calms down some. The more severe bronchiospasm generally occurs in people with underlying lung disease or asthma.

There may also be a slight decrease in the amount of breath the person can draw into their lungs when they inhale their insulin. This was not enough to concern the pulmonary specialist on the panel that recommended the FDA approve the drug. The data suggest that any decrease in lung capacity is reversible if the person stops the drug.

But because of this side effect, people with asthma, smokers, and people who have recently stopped smoking should not use Afrezza.

The PI also says that doctors should test patients' breath capacity (spirometry) before prescribing Afrezza and then check it some months later, just to make sure they aren't having a significant problem.

The only other major side effect mentioned is that this stuff appears to interact badly with Actos and Avandia and raise the risk of heart failure. This isn't surprising, as ALL insulins when taken with these drugs raise the likelihood that people will develop heart failure. If you read the pages on the main Blood Sugar 101 web site about these drugs, you will see that there are plenty of other reasons you shouldn't be taking them.

There is no contraindication for taking Afrezza with other oral drugs. I would suggest that you take it and any other insulin only with metformin. You can read of the problems with the other oral drugs on the main Blood Sugar 101 web site. I think it would be very wise NOT to use Afrezza with Januvia since these drugs may turn off a part of the immune system that kills newly cancerous cells. Though testing suggests that Afrezza does not raise the risk of cancer, why take chances by turning off your body's first line defense against rogue cells?

Who can NOT take Afrezza
Afrezza has not been tested in children and is not currently approved for use in children. The FDA has requested that tests in children be run with an eye to approving it for them in the future, but obviously before they could be performed, the company that makes Afrezza will have to come up with smaller dose sizes.

There has been no testing of Afrezza in pregnant women, only some confusing tests in rodents, which came up with mixed findings that are hard to interpret. Prescribing it to pregnant women is not recommended in the PI, but not flat out prohibited. Pregnancy is not the time to experiment with new drugs. Obstetricians know how to use injected insulin to keep women with gestational diabetes healthy. If you are diagnosed with gestational diabetes, get over your needle phobia (it takes about three shots, max) and take the shots.

Afrezza is prohibited for people with lung disease, asthma, smokers, and those who have recently stopped smoking.

Now that It's Approved Can You Get a Prescription for Afrezza?
Probably not. Though the drug has been approved, it is produced by a small company, MannKind Corp., which is largely owned by Alfred Mann, the man who originally developed the Minimed pump and subsequently sold to Medtronic.

MannKind does not have the resources to market and distribute the drug. So while they do have a factory in Connecticut that is ramped up to produce several hundred thousand doses of Afrezza, they do not yet have a partnership agreement with a larger company that they would need to market and distribute this insulin. They have been telling the public that such a partnership will be announced "real soon now," but they have a history of saying this that goes back to the early 2000s. Until such a partnership is in place, it is going to be very hard to get your hands on Afrezza.

And sadly, the fact is that Afrezza competes with one cash cows or another of all the big drug companies that do have sales forces that market to endocrinologists, may mean that MannKind will find it tough to find a partner who will not buy into Afrezza to bury it, to keep their other diabetes products selling strongly. They have been looking for a partnership for years, and the fact they don't have one now that the drug has been approved is worrisome.

But it may also be a sign of caution on the par of Alfred Mann, the company's founder. He is in his late 80s, still sharp as a tack, a billionaire several times over, and someone who has made it crystal clear that his interest in his latter years is in improving the health of people with serious diseases, rather than just piling up more wealth. My guess is that such a man is not going to sign an agreement with a company that will not actively promote the drug and make sure it finds a market. But exactly how this will play out is not yet known.

If a partner is announced, the next issue will be, will your insurer pay for Afrezza. Exubera was priced more expensively than injected insulin. MannKind's executives have said that Afrezza will be priced competitively with insulin pens. So if your insurer will pay for pens (which for years, mine would not) you might be able to get Afrezza to try out once the company finds a marketing and distribution partner.

Should You Try Afrezza?

The many years of testing of this drug suggests it is safer than Exubera, whose problems quickly became apparent. However, if you are already using injected insulin and it is working for you, there is no need to rush into using it. If you are having trouble matching insulin to your meals and avoiding highs and hypos, and if can get some samples, it might be interesting to see how well it works for you, and test out the theory that it acts in a more physiological manner.

But there is no need to rush. Let other people be the guinea pigs until it is clear how Afrezza really works and what the real risks are in using it.

If you are a person with Type 2 diabetes whose doctor is telling you you really should try this stuff because your blood sugars are dangerously high, tell your doctor you would be happy to try it, but that you also want the long-acting basal insulin shots that will lower your fasting blood sugar and make Afrezza more effective. And if Afrezza doesn't give you normal blood sugars after meals, ask your doctor for injected insulin and read up on how to carefully adjust the doses until you can get the tight control that will prevent you from developing complications.

Is Afrezza Suitable for Newly Diagnosed Type 2s?
The one place Afrezza might be a real game changer would be in the case of the newly diagnosed people with early Type 2 diabetes, who are usually just put on oral drugs. That is because of the data that suggests that starting insulin very early in the treatment of diabetes can produce very good results years later, even after insulin has been discontinued.

But if you are newly diagnosed, before you grab your insulin inhaler, try the strategy you will find described HERE. It may lower your blood sugar enough that you don't need Afrezza. Even if you do end up trying insulin, using that insulin with a lower carbohydrate intake is likely to give you much better blood sugars, both fasting and post-meal, than using meal-time insulin with a very high carb intake. Doing that is the classic case of keeping one foot on the accelerator and one on the brake.

June 11, 2014

I have not been posting much as there is more than enough on my web site to help visitors understand how to control their diabetes and retain their health. But today's news featured a diabetes-related headline so toxic, I had to break my silence.

The headline, which differs depending on which publication reported the study, states something like:

The finding of this study, which analyzed a pool of greatly oversimplified medical records, was that people with Type 2 diabetes who took metformin with a sulfonylurea drug had better survival rates than those who took metformin with insulin.

It is quite possible this is true. But to believe that this implies that taking insulin and metformin will cause you bodily harm would be a huge mistake--albeit one that I am almost certain most family doctors will make and one that will, over the long term, lead to them giving their patients even poorer diabetes care than they get now--if that is possible.

But the logic behind the conclusion that the metformin/insulin combo will kill you is similar to the logic that says that living on New York City's Fifth Avenue will make you rich since people living their are richer than people living in other city neighborhoods.

To understand this finding you need only consider who the patients are who get put on an insulin and metformin regimen. Number one, they are almost all patients treated by family doctors, since only a very small sliver of people with Type 2 have access to endocrinologists and those tend to be wealthier, more highly educated patients who have the kinds of jobs that give them premium health insurance. The rest of the older, retired, unemployed, or middle income people who have gotten diabetes during the period of the study would have been very lucky to have any health insurance at all, and the costs of seeing an endo would have been beyond their ability to pay.

So once you realize the majority of these patients were treated by family doctors, you have to add to that the knowledge that family doctors will go to great lengths to avoid prescribing insulin to patients because it requires a lot of time and hand-holding to get insulin working safely. This is time that the family doctors do not get reimbursed for, since insurers and medicare do not reimburse physicians for diabetes education.

Therefore, family doctors will put their Type 2 patients on every single oral drug available before they turn to insulin. The sulfonylurea drugs, glibenclamide, glyburide, etc., which provided better outcomes according to the study used to be the first drugs prescribed to people with diabetes, as they are very cheap, but with the advent of the newer, far more expensive incretin drugs, Januvia, Onglyza, Byetta, Victoza this is no longer true.

But here's the crux of the matter. Both the sulfonylureas and the newer drugs work by coaxing beta cells to secrete more insulin. So none of them will do a thing for a person with Type 2 diabetes who no longer has functioning beta cless. And the people with Type 2 beta cells are those whose beta cells have died after years of exposure to dangerously high blood sugars--the very high blood sugars that study after study shows are maintained by the majority of patients who are put on the newer drugs. (Over 140 mg/dl all the time and over 200 mg/dl for hours after each meal.)

So what happens is that after diagnosing someone with Type 2 diabetes the family doctor puts them on one drug for 6 months that leaves them with damagingly high blood sugars that kills off beta cells. When the patient comes back to the office with a still-terrible A1c the doctor prescribes a second oral drug which makes a slight decrease in the blood sugar, perhaps, but still leaves them with an A1c closer to 8 than 5.

This goes on for years, with the A1c creeping up to the 10% range and higher. The patient develops heart disease, retinal damage, kidney damage. Only five or perhaps ten years after being put on the oral drug cocktail do they get to the stage where they are producing no insulin at all and the doctor is forced to put them on insulin.

But remember, family doctors aren't trained in dosing insulin and don't get paid for working with patients to dose insulin and most insurers don't pay for the kind of diabetes education given people with Type 1 diabetes for the hordes with Type 2. So when family doctors put people "on insulin" they generally give them doses that are low enough that the patient, who has no understanding of how to use insulin, won't give themselves lots of dangerous hypos. These are eneric doses of basal insulin which may lower the fasting blood sugar from 250 mg/dl to 180 mg/dl, but do almost nothing to lower post-meal blood sugars which may easily be reaching into the 400 mg/dl level or higher after every meal.

So yes, the people put on metformin and insulin prescribed like that WILL die at higher rates, because they have been running dangerously high blood sugars for years and continue running them after having been given insulin.

In contrast, people with Type 2 who are put on sulfonylureas at diagnosis and respond with a dramatic drop in their blood sugars are the people who have inherited the specific diabetes genes that cause a flaw in insulin secretion that sulfonylurea drugs can correct. There are several of these genes prevalent in the population diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes.

These people WILL get much better blood sugars taking with those drugs and having better blood sugar levels means they are far less likely to develop the fatal damage to their arteries and nerves that kill the people who did not respond to these drugs--the people who after long delays, put on insulin.

But get this straight: There is absolutely NOTHING about the insulin/metformin combo that is damaging in itself. Good research has shown that if people with Type 2 diabetes are put on insulin shortly after diagnosis, many years after they stop using insulin, even if they have stopped the insulin after a short period of use, they do better than other people with Type 2.

You can read more about what research has learned about using insulin for Type 2 diabetes HERE.

SearchThis Blog and Bloodsugar101.com

This is the blog for Blood Sugar 101.

Visit the mainBlood Sugar 101 Web Site to learn more about how blood sugar works, what blood sugar levels cause organ damage, what blood sugar levels are safe and how to achieve those safe blood sugar levels.

Stalled on Your Diet?

I was diagnosed with diabetes in 1998. Since then I've kept my A1cs in the 5.0-6.0% range using the techniques you'll find explained at The main Blood Sugar 101 Web Site, where you'll also find extensive discussion of the peer-reviewed research that backs up the statements you read here.

I've also published two books on related subjects, Blood Sugar 101: What They Don't Tell You About Diabetes, which was an Amazon Diabetes bestseller for 3 years and Diet 101: The Truth About Low Carb Diets.