Support Requests item #3582355, was opened at 2012-10-31 15:29
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gooberific
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3582355&group_id=11118
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: 3.0.19
Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: https://www.google.com/accounts ()
Assigned to: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Summary: Windows 8 metro UI apps connection problems
Initial Comment:
It seems Privoxy doesn't play well with Windows 8 (x64 PRO). Desktop apps works well, but various metro-UI apps like the built-in application Store doesn't. Others, like default windows games which using the metro UI (e.g. minesweeper) has various issues, unable to connect to XBOX live account, timeouts. Store either says "there is no internet connection" or just hangs at a white screen or startup screen. Tried with privoxy started as a user mode app or as a service as well, with same results.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Gliberific (gooberific)
Date: 2012-11-27 08:39
Message:
Yeah , I got privoxy to tun finally , a conflict with my firewall loading
AFTER privoxy. I have now treid those suggestions and it doesn't work . The
Metro apps still don't honor the settings and fail to connect .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Gliberific (gooberific)
Date: 2012-11-25 19:39
Message:
I don't know if this will work , I haven't tried it because I can't get
privoxy to start with Windows 8 .
Configure Proxy server using netsh
Open a command prompt as administrator
type Netsh winhttp import proxy source=ie
restart the computer
or
run gpedit.msc
go to Computer Configuration >Administrative Template>Network>Network
Isolation
Double click on Internet proxy servers for apps or click on edit setting
The internet proxy server for apps window will open, click on ENABLE
then enter the proxy IP in the Domain proxies box then click on ok and
restart the computer .
Hopefully , if I understood this right , It should force the Metro UI apps
to use privoxy .
I got all this third hand from someone else , and as I stated I have not
tried it myself because as of yet I have been unable to get Privoxy to load
with Windows 8 at startup and am not doing anything else until I get that
figured out .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-05 08:56
Message:
Great. Thanks for reporting the cause of the problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: https://www.google.com/accounts ()
Date: 2012-11-03 10:07
Message:
It seems solved:
Metro-style applications run inside isolated processes known as
“AppContainers,” and by default, AppContainers are forbidden from
sending network traffic to the local computer (loopback).
That's why they couldn't reach the net trough privoxy which listens on a
loopback address (127.0.0.1).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: https://www.google.com/accounts ()
Date: 2012-11-03 08:14
Message:
An additional bit of info: like I said, standard browsing on the desktop
interface with any regular browser (Chrome, IE10, etc.) works as expected,
just Metro UI apps like store, games has this kind of connectivity problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: https://www.google.com/accounts ()
Date: 2012-11-03 08:07
Message:
Ok, here is the hopefully more clear description:
- Version being used: Privoxy 3.0.19 - DL from SourceForge;
- Operating System / cpu: Windows 8 PRO 64bit, retail; on Intel i7
- browser: irrelevant;
- no other proxy runs in tandem with privoxy, Windows 8 PRO 64bit clean
install, with default settings: windows built-in firewall on, windows
defender on;
Simple steps to reproduce:
- start privoxy with default settings;
- set windows to use privoxy by default (internet options / connections /
lan settings)
- try to access "Store" from the start interface
Expected: store shows up
Actual: error screen which says: your PC isn't connected to internet.
I've attached a log with debug set to 33809, hope that helps.
Thanks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-01 12:40
Message:
Unfortunately the description is too vague to do anything about this.
Please have a look at:
http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/contact.html#CONTACT-BUGS
and provide the missing information.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3582355&group_id=11118

Support Requests item #3589668, was opened at 2012-11-24 10:29
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fabiankeil
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589668&group_id=11118
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: blocking
Group: 3.0.19
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Grasshopper (quanticsleep)
Assigned to: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Summary: Issues with Exchange being blocked by Privoxy
Initial Comment:
Privoxy 3.0.19 on Mac Os X Mountain Lion
Login Username: quanticsleep
Hi,
I'm new to privoxy, and don't think to be able to tinker with the config files right now.
I have issues with Exchange. First I tried to set it up (through Mountain Lion accounts system pref) and it didn't recognized my logins and server address. Then I plugged privoxy off and it worked perfectly.
So my question is, how may I allow communication between my Mac and Exchange with Privoxy ? I think the issue may be with SSL first, and another one in the protocol used by Microsoft. Not sure though…
Any help greatly appreciated,
Regards,
GH
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-27 01:36
Message:
You're welcome.
Thanks for posting the solution.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Grasshopper (quanticsleep)
Date: 2012-11-26 11:16
Message:
Thanks,
Following what you told me about auto discovery, I assumed that once setup
sync should be working properly.
So I switched privoxy off, launched auto discovery, and then switched
privoxy on. I then tested to see if sync of calendar worked, and sync
happened instantly.
So this is a closed case: Exchange works like a charm :D
Just for people who end up with the same issue : just switch privoxy off
when setting things up !
Thank you fabian for your support :)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-26 10:42
Message:
The log indicates that the connection is rejected by the server side. I
can't connect to any of the IP addresses either, so that doesn't appear to
be a local problem.
It's possible that the domain is incorrect, or that the auto discovery
doesn't work through HTTP proxies in general.
Maybe you can workaround the problem by disabling auto discovery and
specifying the server address directly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Grasshopper (quanticsleep)
Date: 2012-11-26 06:58
Message:
Hi fabiankeil,
Here is the logfile. Sensible content has been replaced by a [removed]
tag.
I kept only what seemed to me to be exchange related.
http://pastebin.com/XA3K5fTv
Hope that helps!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-26 04:36
Message:
Please provide a log excerpt as described at:
http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/contact.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589668&group_id=11118

Support Requests item #3589668, was opened at 2012-11-24 10:29
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by quanticsleep
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589668&group_id=11118
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: blocking
Group: 3.0.19
>Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Grasshopper (quanticsleep)
Assigned to: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Summary: Issues with Exchange being blocked by Privoxy
Initial Comment:
Privoxy 3.0.19 on Mac Os X Mountain Lion
Login Username: quanticsleep
Hi,
I'm new to privoxy, and don't think to be able to tinker with the config files right now.
I have issues with Exchange. First I tried to set it up (through Mountain Lion accounts system pref) and it didn't recognized my logins and server address. Then I plugged privoxy off and it worked perfectly.
So my question is, how may I allow communication between my Mac and Exchange with Privoxy ? I think the issue may be with SSL first, and another one in the protocol used by Microsoft. Not sure though…
Any help greatly appreciated,
Regards,
GH
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Grasshopper (quanticsleep)
Date: 2012-11-26 11:16
Message:
Thanks,
Following what you told me about auto discovery, I assumed that once setup
sync should be working properly.
So I switched privoxy off, launched auto discovery, and then switched
privoxy on. I then tested to see if sync of calendar worked, and sync
happened instantly.
So this is a closed case: Exchange works like a charm :D
Just for people who end up with the same issue : just switch privoxy off
when setting things up !
Thank you fabian for your support :)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-26 10:42
Message:
The log indicates that the connection is rejected by the server side. I
can't connect to any of the IP addresses either, so that doesn't appear to
be a local problem.
It's possible that the domain is incorrect, or that the auto discovery
doesn't work through HTTP proxies in general.
Maybe you can workaround the problem by disabling auto discovery and
specifying the server address directly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Grasshopper (quanticsleep)
Date: 2012-11-26 06:58
Message:
Hi fabiankeil,
Here is the logfile. Sensible content has been replaced by a [removed]
tag.
I kept only what seemed to me to be exchange related.
http://pastebin.com/XA3K5fTv
Hope that helps!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-26 04:36
Message:
Please provide a log excerpt as described at:
http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/contact.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589668&group_id=11118

Support Requests item #3589668, was opened at 2012-11-24 10:29
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fabiankeil
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589668&group_id=11118
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: blocking
Group: 3.0.19
>Status: Pending
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Grasshopper (quanticsleep)
Assigned to: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Summary: Issues with Exchange being blocked by Privoxy
Initial Comment:
Privoxy 3.0.19 on Mac Os X Mountain Lion
Login Username: quanticsleep
Hi,
I'm new to privoxy, and don't think to be able to tinker with the config files right now.
I have issues with Exchange. First I tried to set it up (through Mountain Lion accounts system pref) and it didn't recognized my logins and server address. Then I plugged privoxy off and it worked perfectly.
So my question is, how may I allow communication between my Mac and Exchange with Privoxy ? I think the issue may be with SSL first, and another one in the protocol used by Microsoft. Not sure though…
Any help greatly appreciated,
Regards,
GH
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-26 10:42
Message:
The log indicates that the connection is rejected by the server side. I
can't connect to any of the IP addresses either, so that doesn't appear to
be a local problem.
It's possible that the domain is incorrect, or that the auto discovery
doesn't work through HTTP proxies in general.
Maybe you can workaround the problem by disabling auto discovery and
specifying the server address directly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Grasshopper (quanticsleep)
Date: 2012-11-26 06:58
Message:
Hi fabiankeil,
Here is the logfile. Sensible content has been replaced by a [removed]
tag.
I kept only what seemed to me to be exchange related.
http://pastebin.com/XA3K5fTv
Hope that helps!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-26 04:36
Message:
Please provide a log excerpt as described at:
http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/contact.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589668&group_id=11118

Support Requests item #3589668, was opened at 2012-11-24 10:29
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by quanticsleep
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589668&group_id=11118
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: blocking
Group: 3.0.19
>Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Grasshopper (quanticsleep)
Assigned to: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Summary: Issues with Exchange being blocked by Privoxy
Initial Comment:
Privoxy 3.0.19 on Mac Os X Mountain Lion
Login Username: quanticsleep
Hi,
I'm new to privoxy, and don't think to be able to tinker with the config files right now.
I have issues with Exchange. First I tried to set it up (through Mountain Lion accounts system pref) and it didn't recognized my logins and server address. Then I plugged privoxy off and it worked perfectly.
So my question is, how may I allow communication between my Mac and Exchange with Privoxy ? I think the issue may be with SSL first, and another one in the protocol used by Microsoft. Not sure though…
Any help greatly appreciated,
Regards,
GH
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Grasshopper (quanticsleep)
Date: 2012-11-26 06:58
Message:
Hi fabiankeil,
Here is the logfile. Sensible content has been replaced by a [removed]
tag.
I kept only what seemed to me to be exchange related.
http://pastebin.com/XA3K5fTv
Hope that helps!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-26 04:36
Message:
Please provide a log excerpt as described at:
http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/contact.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589668&group_id=11118

Support Requests item #3589668, was opened at 2012-11-24 10:29
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fabiankeil
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589668&group_id=11118
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: blocking
Group: 3.0.19
>Status: Pending
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Grasshopper (quanticsleep)
>Assigned to: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Summary: Issues with Exchange being blocked by Privoxy
Initial Comment:
Privoxy 3.0.19 on Mac Os X Mountain Lion
Login Username: quanticsleep
Hi,
I'm new to privoxy, and don't think to be able to tinker with the config files right now.
I have issues with Exchange. First I tried to set it up (through Mountain Lion accounts system pref) and it didn't recognized my logins and server address. Then I plugged privoxy off and it worked perfectly.
So my question is, how may I allow communication between my Mac and Exchange with Privoxy ? I think the issue may be with SSL first, and another one in the protocol used by Microsoft. Not sure though…
Any help greatly appreciated,
Regards,
GH
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-26 04:36
Message:
Please provide a log excerpt as described at:
http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/contact.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589668&group_id=11118

Support Requests item #3582355, was opened at 2012-10-31 15:29
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gooberific
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3582355&group_id=11118
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: 3.0.19
Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: https://www.google.com/accounts ()
Assigned to: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Summary: Windows 8 metro UI apps connection problems
Initial Comment:
It seems Privoxy doesn't play well with Windows 8 (x64 PRO). Desktop apps works well, but various metro-UI apps like the built-in application Store doesn't. Others, like default windows games which using the metro UI (e.g. minesweeper) has various issues, unable to connect to XBOX live account, timeouts. Store either says "there is no internet connection" or just hangs at a white screen or startup screen. Tried with privoxy started as a user mode app or as a service as well, with same results.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Gliberific (gooberific)
Date: 2012-11-25 19:39
Message:
I don't know if this will work , I haven't tried it because I can't get
privoxy to start with Windows 8 .
Configure Proxy server using netsh
Open a command prompt as administrator
type Netsh winhttp import proxy source=ie
restart the computer
or
run gpedit.msc
go to Computer Configuration >Administrative Template>Network>Network
Isolation
Double click on Internet proxy servers for apps or click on edit setting
The internet proxy server for apps window will open, click on ENABLE
then enter the proxy IP in the Domain proxies box then click on ok and
restart the computer .
Hopefully , if I understood this right , It should force the Metro UI apps
to use privoxy .
I got all this third hand from someone else , and as I stated I have not
tried it myself because as of yet I have been unable to get Privoxy to load
with Windows 8 at startup and am not doing anything else until I get that
figured out .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-05 08:56
Message:
Great. Thanks for reporting the cause of the problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: https://www.google.com/accounts ()
Date: 2012-11-03 10:07
Message:
It seems solved:
Metro-style applications run inside isolated processes known as
“AppContainers,” and by default, AppContainers are forbidden from
sending network traffic to the local computer (loopback).
That's why they couldn't reach the net trough privoxy which listens on a
loopback address (127.0.0.1).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: https://www.google.com/accounts ()
Date: 2012-11-03 08:14
Message:
An additional bit of info: like I said, standard browsing on the desktop
interface with any regular browser (Chrome, IE10, etc.) works as expected,
just Metro UI apps like store, games has this kind of connectivity problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: https://www.google.com/accounts ()
Date: 2012-11-03 08:07
Message:
Ok, here is the hopefully more clear description:
- Version being used: Privoxy 3.0.19 - DL from SourceForge;
- Operating System / cpu: Windows 8 PRO 64bit, retail; on Intel i7
- browser: irrelevant;
- no other proxy runs in tandem with privoxy, Windows 8 PRO 64bit clean
install, with default settings: windows built-in firewall on, windows
defender on;
Simple steps to reproduce:
- start privoxy with default settings;
- set windows to use privoxy by default (internet options / connections /
lan settings)
- try to access "Store" from the start interface
Expected: store shows up
Actual: error screen which says: your PC isn't connected to internet.
I've attached a log with debug set to 33809, hope that helps.
Thanks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-01 12:40
Message:
Unfortunately the description is too vague to do anything about this.
Please have a look at:
http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/contact.html#CONTACT-BUGS
and provide the missing information.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3582355&group_id=11118

Support Requests item #3589668, was opened at 2012-11-24 10:29
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by quanticsleep
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589668&group_id=11118
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: blocking
>Group: 3.0.19
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Grasshopper (quanticsleep)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Issues with Exchange being blocked by Privoxy
Initial Comment:
Privoxy 3.0.19 on Mac Os X Mountain Lion
Login Username: quanticsleep
Hi,
I'm new to privoxy, and don't think to be able to tinker with the config files right now.
I have issues with Exchange. First I tried to set it up (through Mountain Lion accounts system pref) and it didn't recognized my logins and server address. Then I plugged privoxy off and it worked perfectly.
So my question is, how may I allow communication between my Mac and Exchange with Privoxy ? I think the issue may be with SSL first, and another one in the protocol used by Microsoft. Not sure though…
Any help greatly appreciated,
Regards,
GH
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589668&group_id=11118

Support Requests item #3589668, was opened at 2012-11-24 10:29
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by quanticsleep
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589668&group_id=11118
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: blocking
Group: 3.1.x
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Grasshopper (quanticsleep)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Issues with Exchange being blocked by Privoxy
Initial Comment:
Privoxy 3.0.19 on Mac Os X Mountain Lion
Login Username: quanticsleep
Hi,
I'm new to privoxy, and don't think to be able to tinker with the config files right now.
I have issues with Exchange. First I tried to set it up (through Mountain Lion accounts system pref) and it didn't recognized my logins and server address. Then I plugged privoxy off and it worked perfectly.
So my question is, how may I allow communication between my Mac and Exchange with Privoxy ? I think the issue may be with SSL first, and another one in the protocol used by Microsoft. Not sure though…
Any help greatly appreciated,
Regards,
GH
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589668&group_id=11118

Support Requests item #3589588, was opened at 2012-11-24 02:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fabiankeil
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589588&group_id=11118
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Epistémé (promeneur)
Assigned to: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Summary: 3.0.19, partial filtering
Initial Comment:
mandriva 2010.2 i586
privoxy 3.0.19
kernel 3.4.11
since yesterday privoxy works partially
For firefox, konqueror, chromium :
1 if i select "use system parameters for proxy settings"
no filtering
2. if i select "manual proxy settings"
i have a filtering :
- complete with http://www.lemonde.fr
- uncomplete with http://www.lefigaro.fr
- no filtering with http://www.phoronix.com
i did not update anything about network
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-24 05:48
Message:
Privoxy doesn't filter encrypted traffic:
http://www.privoxy.org/faq/misc.html#AEN914
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Epistémé (promeneur)
Date: 2012-11-24 05:18
Message:
for firefox 17.0
- systel parameters settings
with or without httpseverywhere 3.0.4 extension
firefox does not use privoxy
- manual settings
with httpseverywhere 3.0.4 extension then partial filtering
without httpseverywhere 3.0.4 extension then complete filtering
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Epistémé (promeneur)
Date: 2012-11-24 04:46
Message:
for firefox
- system parameters settings
firefox don't use privoxy
when using a false url then we have the firefox panel 404, not the privoxy
one
- manual settings
partial filtering
when using a false url then we have privoxy panel 404, not the firefox one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Epistémé (promeneur)
Date: 2012-11-24 04:04
Message:
for firefox
i cleaned cache then same pb
for konqueror
i don't use any cache (cache is disabled)
today it works well
it seems that firefox 17.0 has a pb with privoxy
i will send you a privoxy log using firefox
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-24 02:49
Message:
I don't see any indication that you confirmed that the requests are
reaching Privoxy, for example by enabling logging as described at:
http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/contact.html#CONTACT-BUGS
It's also not clear to me if you cleaned the browser caches between your
experiments to make sure the "partial filtering" isn't the result of
partial caching.
I think it's unlikely that Privoxy is at fault here, but without additional
information there's no way to tell for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589588&group_id=11118

Support Requests item #3589588, was opened at 2012-11-24 02:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by promeneur
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589588&group_id=11118
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Epistémé (promeneur)
Assigned to: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Summary: 3.0.19, partial filtering
Initial Comment:
mandriva 2010.2 i586
privoxy 3.0.19
kernel 3.4.11
since yesterday privoxy works partially
For firefox, konqueror, chromium :
1 if i select "use system parameters for proxy settings"
no filtering
2. if i select "manual proxy settings"
i have a filtering :
- complete with http://www.lemonde.fr
- uncomplete with http://www.lefigaro.fr
- no filtering with http://www.phoronix.com
i did not update anything about network
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Epistémé (promeneur)
Date: 2012-11-24 05:18
Message:
for firefox 17.0
- systel parameters settings
with or without httpseverywhere 3.0.4 extension
firefox does not use privoxy
- manual settings
with httpseverywhere 3.0.4 extension then partial filtering
without httpseverywhere 3.0.4 extension then complete filtering
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Epistémé (promeneur)
Date: 2012-11-24 04:46
Message:
for firefox
- system parameters settings
firefox don't use privoxy
when using a false url then we have the firefox panel 404, not the privoxy
one
- manual settings
partial filtering
when using a false url then we have privoxy panel 404, not the firefox one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Epistémé (promeneur)
Date: 2012-11-24 04:04
Message:
for firefox
i cleaned cache then same pb
for konqueror
i don't use any cache (cache is disabled)
today it works well
it seems that firefox 17.0 has a pb with privoxy
i will send you a privoxy log using firefox
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-24 02:49
Message:
I don't see any indication that you confirmed that the requests are
reaching Privoxy, for example by enabling logging as described at:
http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/contact.html#CONTACT-BUGS
It's also not clear to me if you cleaned the browser caches between your
experiments to make sure the "partial filtering" isn't the result of
partial caching.
I think it's unlikely that Privoxy is at fault here, but without additional
information there's no way to tell for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589588&group_id=11118

Support Requests item #3589588, was opened at 2012-11-24 02:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by promeneur
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589588&group_id=11118
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Epistémé (promeneur)
Assigned to: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Summary: 3.0.19, partial filtering
Initial Comment:
mandriva 2010.2 i586
privoxy 3.0.19
kernel 3.4.11
since yesterday privoxy works partially
For firefox, konqueror, chromium :
1 if i select "use system parameters for proxy settings"
no filtering
2. if i select "manual proxy settings"
i have a filtering :
- complete with http://www.lemonde.fr
- uncomplete with http://www.lefigaro.fr
- no filtering with http://www.phoronix.com
i did not update anything about network
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Epistémé (promeneur)
Date: 2012-11-24 04:46
Message:
for firefox
- system parameters settings
firefox don't use privoxy
when using a false url then we have the firefox panel 404, not the privoxy
one
- manual settings
partial filtering
when using a false url then we have privoxy panel 404, not the firefox one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Epistémé (promeneur)
Date: 2012-11-24 04:04
Message:
for firefox
i cleaned cache then same pb
for konqueror
i don't use any cache (cache is disabled)
today it works well
it seems that firefox 17.0 has a pb with privoxy
i will send you a privoxy log using firefox
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-24 02:49
Message:
I don't see any indication that you confirmed that the requests are
reaching Privoxy, for example by enabling logging as described at:
http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/contact.html#CONTACT-BUGS
It's also not clear to me if you cleaned the browser caches between your
experiments to make sure the "partial filtering" isn't the result of
partial caching.
I think it's unlikely that Privoxy is at fault here, but without additional
information there's no way to tell for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589588&group_id=11118

Support Requests item #3589588, was opened at 2012-11-24 02:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by promeneur
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589588&group_id=11118
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Epistémé (promeneur)
Assigned to: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Summary: 3.0.19, partial filtering
Initial Comment:
mandriva 2010.2 i586
privoxy 3.0.19
kernel 3.4.11
since yesterday privoxy works partially
For firefox, konqueror, chromium :
1 if i select "use system parameters for proxy settings"
no filtering
2. if i select "manual proxy settings"
i have a filtering :
- complete with http://www.lemonde.fr
- uncomplete with http://www.lefigaro.fr
- no filtering with http://www.phoronix.com
i did not update anything about network
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Epistémé (promeneur)
Date: 2012-11-24 04:04
Message:
for firefox
i cleaned cache then same pb
for konqueror
i don't use any cache (cache is disabled)
today it works well
it seems that firefox 17.0 has a pb with privoxy
i will send you a privoxy log using firefox
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-24 02:49
Message:
I don't see any indication that you confirmed that the requests are
reaching Privoxy, for example by enabling logging as described at:
http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/contact.html#CONTACT-BUGS
It's also not clear to me if you cleaned the browser caches between your
experiments to make sure the "partial filtering" isn't the result of
partial caching.
I think it's unlikely that Privoxy is at fault here, but without additional
information there's no way to tell for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589588&group_id=11118

Support Requests item #3589588, was opened at 2012-11-24 02:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fabiankeil
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589588&group_id=11118
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
>Group: None
>Status: Pending
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Epistémé (promeneur)
>Assigned to: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Summary: 3.0.19, partial filtering
Initial Comment:
mandriva 2010.2 i586
privoxy 3.0.19
kernel 3.4.11
since yesterday privoxy works partially
For firefox, konqueror, chromium :
1 if i select "use system parameters for proxy settings"
no filtering
2. if i select "manual proxy settings"
i have a filtering :
- complete with http://www.lemonde.fr
- uncomplete with http://www.lefigaro.fr
- no filtering with http://www.phoronix.com
i did not update anything about network
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-24 02:49
Message:
I don't see any indication that you confirmed that the requests are
reaching Privoxy, for example by enabling logging as described at:
http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/contact.html#CONTACT-BUGS
It's also not clear to me if you cleaned the browser caches between your
experiments to make sure the "partial filtering" isn't the result of
partial caching.
I think it's unlikely that Privoxy is at fault here, but without additional
information there's no way to tell for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3589588&group_id=11118

Gilles <codecomplete@...> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:59:31 +0100, Fabian Keil <fk@...>
> wrote:
> >Does the log actually confirm that Privoxy is filtering the page
> >you think it shouldn't?
>
> Thanks but I don't know how to tell through the "debug=" line in
> config.txt.
I'm not sure I understand this correctly.
If you add the debug directives documented at:
http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/contact.html#CONTACT-BUGS
(including "debug 64") it should be obvious from the log whether
or not Privoxy is filtering the page.
You could also post a log excerpt.
Fabian

On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:59:31 +0100, Fabian Keil <fk@...>
wrote:
>Does the log actually confirm that Privoxy is filtering the page
>you think it shouldn't?
Thanks but I don't know how to tell through the "debug=" line in
config.txt.
All I know is that the the forum located in that site (ie.
http://www.acme.com/forum/) doesn't show the Connect section so I can't
connect and start posting, while the section shows OK when the browser
hits the site directly, ie. without going through Privoxy.
I tried using "www.acme.com/" + emptied the cache again, to no avail:
The Connect section in the page still doesn't show, so I have to keep
a second browser handy when I need to post on that forum :-/

Support Requests item #3586654, was opened at 2012-11-13 01:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fabiankeil
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3586654&group_id=11118
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
>Group: None
>Status: Pending
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Epistémé (promeneur)
>Assigned to: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Summary: can't acces to site using incapsula
Initial Comment:
Mandriva 210.2 i586
shorewall activated
no antivirus
no other proxy
firefox 16.0.1
for about a month or less i can't access to dot.kde.org and for some days to
http://www.digikam.org
each time i must fill a captcha
in the contrary of what incapsula says incapsula don't remember me as a true
user and not a virus or a robot
if i unactivate privoxy (3.0.19)
then
i can access directly to kde sites
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-13 10:39
Message:
This is probably not a bug in Privoxy but a side effect of your
configuration.
It looks like the Incapsula snake oil requires the client to accept cookies
and execute JavaScript from various sources.
I find it especially amusing that even the "Why is this happening" page is
"protected" and thus doesn't work.
If you let Privoxy log what's going on as described at:
http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/contact.html#CONTACT-BUGS
you'll probably be able to work around the problem. If you need help with
that, please post a log excerpt.
Before you do that, though, I'd recommend that you ask KDE e.V. if they are
aware the problem and if they are sure that they are using the Incapsula
nonsense in compliance with the relevant German laws.
In my opinion the proper solution would be for KDE e.V. to get their
websites working without this nonsense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3586654&group_id=11118

Gilles <codecomplete@...> wrote:
> Some sites won't work if they are filtered by my smallish user.filter,
> so I add them to that section in user.action:
>
> {-filter{ignore-sites}}
> http://www.acme.com
>
> However, some sites still don't work even after emptying the browser's
> cache, so I have to use them through a second browser that I use
> without Privoxy.
>
> Why could prevent Privoxy from not filtering a site after it's added
> to that filter above?
Does the log actually confirm that Privoxy is filtering the page
you think it shouldn't?
http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/contact.html#CONTACT-BUGS
Fabian

Support Requests item #3586397, was opened at 2012-11-12 09:53
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by ferrockrose
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3586397&group_id=11118
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: configuration
Group: 3.0.19
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Ferrockrose (ferrockrose)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Privoxy Don't Show Log
Initial Comment:
Hi My Problem is:
Privoxy never show a log, when i open Privoxy it's clear... I was configure it to enable with Chrome Changing the line in the file for 8118 And It Works!
but never show the log
can you say me the line in the configuration txt that i must to have to show the logs
thank you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3586397&group_id=11118

Support Requests item #3586302, was opened at 2012-11-11 22:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fabiankeil
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3586302&group_id=11118
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: actions files
Group: 3.0.x
>Status: Pending
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Sorella ()
>Assigned to: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Summary: domain to ip match
Initial Comment:
How can I forward a mount of domain with the same ip address for example 1.2.3.4 to local proxy with one line pattern
example action
{{alias}}
gae = +forward-override{forward 127.0.0.1:8087}
{gae}
1.2.3.4
I suppose that all domain with the ip 1.2.3.4 will be forwarded to localhost:8087
Buit now seems not function
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-11-12 09:30
Message:
URL patterns work with the URL specified by the client.
If the client isn't specifying the IP address, you'll have to specify all
the domains that resolve to the IP address you care about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3586302&group_id=11118

Hello
Some sites won't work if they are filtered by my smallish user.filter,
so I add them to that section in user.action:
{-filter{ignore-sites}}
http://www.acme.com
However, some sites still don't work even after emptying the browser's
cache, so I have to use them through a second browser that I use
without Privoxy.
Why could prevent Privoxy from not filtering a site after it's added
to that filter above?
Thank you.

Support Requests item #3586302, was opened at 2012-11-11 22:54
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3586302&group_id=11118
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: actions files
Group: 3.0.x
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Sorella ()
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: domain to ip match
Initial Comment:
How can I forward a mount of domain with the same ip address for example 1.2.3.4 to local proxy with one line pattern
example action
{{alias}}
gae = +forward-override{forward 127.0.0.1:8087}
{gae}
1.2.3.4
I suppose that all domain with the ip 1.2.3.4 will be forwarded to localhost:8087
Buit now seems not function
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3586302&group_id=11118

Hi all,
I've been putting this off for too long now. I'm considering developing an iOS port of Privoxy, but have so far been stopped by one thing; testing. Who amongst the subscribers of this list has a jailbroken iPhone and would be interested in testing alpha & beta releases of my work?
I warn you that this will not be entirely trivial. As you'll know, software for jailbroken iPhones is distributed via the Cydia application and is hosted at various repositories. Installing my pre-release versions will (at least initially) be an entirely manual process since I will not be hosted at a repository (in time I might work out how to host my own repository which will slightly ease the complexity).
So, on this basis, is anyone interested and if yes, what iPhone and iOS version do you run?
Cheers,
Ian