Children's rights violated in France

A «JUDGE» AND «EDUCATORS»
were HARASSING my CHILDREN!

An incredible story: These two children,
who already had to live into a sect,
also had to bear the same
kind of behaviour from a «children judge» and several «educators».
Understand from peoples who act on behalf of the society. Thus how can we
get out of a sect?

MY TESTIMONY

«My» case (one
among tens of thousands) started in 1990. At that time, I was still
living into the (very small) sect
«les Amis de la Douceur et de l'Harmonie" (The friends of gentleness
and Harmony) (In the Pyrennées Orientales). After ten years of
voluntary unpaid work in this group (masonry, roofing, garden, animation,
review...) I had to admit that I was thanked in mistreating my new born
son («harmonist» baths at 4°, no tenderness, held far away from me...
what provoked a serious anorexia and a very visible distress) This was
one of the worse moments of my life, and only the motive of protecting
my children allowed me to do the right things: get out of this group,
find a job (in 10 days, as a technician in the Toulouse space centre,
heyhey) a home, and the like... and especially denounce all I had seen
to the children protection services.

Without entering into far fetched details,
in 1990 I was received by the children «judge», who heard at me lengthily,
just to giggle in my back when I went out; to the family affair «judge»
who even not heard at me, while the «attorney» of the sect presented
the affair as a TV series psychodrama; at last I never met the «social
worker» in charge of gathering my testimony at the occasion of the
«enquête sociale»
(inquiry about situation and way of life), but this person was still
able to make a detailed report on my motives, where testimonies were
thoroughly selected (nearby all the witnesses were members of the
sect, and, among neighbours, only those friendly with the sect were
quoted in the report). This report, void of any methodology (in a
scientific context, its author would have been fired out) also contains
many mind control tips: psychological interpretations (to rig myself
with motives such as desire of revenge) justification after the event
(to present facts in inverted chronological order, such as to say
that the anorexia was «because of the father's prosecutions»,
when it is about this anorexia that I warned the justice) present
the culprit as the victim (She inflicted herself most of the ill treatments,
and she still plays a first role in the sect). Curiously I was able
to obtain a copy of this «secret» report through my attorney
at that time (the only useful thing he did) which shows in a strikingly
way the absence of any method and objectivity in such documents. And
all this chaos just to obtain a «shared parental authority»
(autorité parentale partagée) which left nearby no power in practice
(To «manage the asset»... but not to avoid to break heart and mind
of the children!!! We immediatelly guess what kind of blokes voted
for such laws!). And I had to do all this again two years later to
obtain the right to take my children in holidays (Droit de visite
et d'hébergement). I must however tell that, if I was, me, the victim,
condemned to pay an alimony, I could obtain that this money went on
an account on the name of the children, in order not to be used to
fund the estate of the sect. (The money of the members being gathered
in a common cash)

I was more than one year without meeting my
children; my daughter was unable to recognize me, and had no remembering
of her tender childhood with me. Before, she was lovely, clever and
willing to help, I found back a shy and not merry little girl. I was
myself unable to recognize my son when I saw him in the centre Foncaude
at Montpellier, where he was slowly learning to love life again, thanks
to the good cares he received here. On the other hand the hospital
never gave my any written element on his medical record, only a vague
and benign speech. So we can be very suspicious about them: experiment,
mistake or medical misdeed... as for instance to take samples of intestine
skin when he was obviously in complete emotional deprivation, to the
point of violently refusing any other food that the breast.

In the times between 1991 and 1998 I wasted
a fortune in travels and unpaid leaves, to take my children at all
the holidays. And as if this was not enough, I had to fight two years
against a guy who wanted to be their father in my place, against a
group of quacks who wanted to circumcise my son, another school quack
who denounced my children to justice because they were vegetarian,
and at last «civil servants» of the Sécurité Sociale who constantly
refused to refund medical expenses of my children when they were with
me (A perfectly illegal thing, see the article 161-8 of the Sécurité
Sociale code)

At last in 1998, in the sect, the problems
with the children become so obvious (meal deprivations, stalking and
unfair punishments, no contacts with other children, obstacles to
school work, and still other things) that the social services reacted,
and threatened the mother to withdraw the children. She thus asked
me to take them, and I accepted. Pfiuuu they are saved I thought...
but in fact problems were only beginning. In France, an unmarried
father is an offence, and some began to put all the gear in place
to punish me. As in fact nobody could do anything against me, it is
on the children that the revenge would fall.

But at first I had to move in emergency from
the Toulouse district I lived. At Bagatelle, «cité sensible» («sensitive»
district), women nor children are not allowed outdoor, even not to
play on the lawn (anyway filled with rubbish). Even men have to endure
a real police control by members of fascist youngsters gangs, and
I was myself once caught in a real police roadblock, organized, with
guys spouting all together of the block entrances. As for the real
police, they are furious to see offences going on when they have the
command to do nothing. Anyway in the municipal school meals service,
vegan or Muslim children just have «to eat like everybody».
(Letter from Mr Jean Pierre Lloret, deputy mayor, excluding «the constrains
coming from private life») How to grow children in such an hell?

After I had to regularize the situation with
my children, to the family judge in Perpignan. The firs vexation was
an «enquête sociale» (social
inquiry) report made by a guy from Perpignan, whose legal statute
is unknown. This dropout wrote a report containing several slanders
(for instance my home would have been «badly kept» as in fact I was
repainting it, or he inverts the statements of his own colleagues
from the PJJ of Perpignan) and a mind control method against which
it is really difficult to defend oneself: to impute to me other motives
than mine. In the instance, after a joke of one of my children, he
concludes that I try to keep them away of their mother... when, on
the contrary, I had to help her in her visits to the children. Difficult
to defend oneself against this, as, after an attorney such an accusation
would not be a slander! Sorry, but for a Mahayana practitioner, it
is. And this «inquirer» knew this, as he quote this fact
in his «report». Curiously, all this muddle led to the
opposite of the intended result: The mother obtained much more restricted
rights that I asked for (I only refused that the children would go
in the sect, and she did even not obtained a complete right of access)
As said Gandalf, evil schemes often turn against themselves.

But this was only the beginning. As there was
«a file», «justice» had to continue to monitor the affair, even if
the problem was solved. So the file came to a children «judge», known
to be «very swift»... (He is no longer in position today). He commanded
a «monitoring» AEMO (guided education measure)... This
measure was accomplished by an «educator» who just made some tickle
tickle to my children (who were beginning to wonder if they were really
liberated of the sect) and with me lengthily discussions, a kind of
salvage psychoanalysis... inverted: the one who has problems who psychoanalyses
the one who has not, and who find very subtle problem to explain his
too normal behaviour (You understand? no, but it does not matter,
you do not miss much). And of course, a «report» with
incredible slanders against my children, who strongly shocked them.
Of course I had to attend a «hearing» with this «educator»
and the «judge», where these two persons made a real stalking
session, eyes gleaming and sadistic smiles on their lips...

Revenge of the «judge», who this time granted
me with an IEO (which gives more power than an AEMO, such as to ask
for a psychiatrist). The new «educator» in charge of this measure
starts well, showing sympathetic and understanding, finding a free
holiday camp for my children (funded by the Lyons Club of Castres).
But this favour quickly showed to be that of O'Brien, this especially
sly manipulator that we see in «1984», and who first win the hero's
trust just to more easily make him feel guilty after. Here we are
with the same scenario again: this «educator» no more came to meet
my children, he came to see me alone together to make true mind control
sessions:

-To interpret my philosophical choices as the
expression of psychological troubles; for instance the fact that I
attend to a spiritual teaching centre would be the proof that «I am
afraid of society» (Somebody knows where is the relation?).

-Point as problems a number of details in my
life (for instance my favourite clothing colour was a real problem
for him. He even show his ugly clothing as an example)

-To send me back a very bad image of what the
others were thinking about me (after him). Believing him, everybody
would have be «against me» (when in reality Lavaur is a pleasant little
town where integration is easy).

-It is likely that he made a huge and incredible
work of denigration toward the family of my children, physicians who
followed my son, and other peoples, up to an association leader who
curiously looked at me after his visit...

-At last it seems that this man was an integrist
atheist («Me, about religion, I am a pragmatist» (mind control method
trying to show as the consequences or a logical reasoning what is
only a metaphysical choice, an article of faith) and perhaps a maoist
fascist: his mind control tips and their content (opposition to Buddhism)
look very much like those used in Chinese concentration camps. This
is really serious, but it is better if true, as if it is false, so
we would have to admit that he is a stalker, a pervert,
whose interpretative delirium makes him close of the paranoids.

-Again make two reports containing numerous
slander (still uncheckable) and mind control tips (generally, rid
me with motives other than mine)

Without giving too long details, this circus
lasted one and a half years, and it also was one of the most painful
moments of my life, especially when seeing the terrific consequences
on my children. The way it ended seems to me, with the passing of
time, rather incredible. Again an «hearing» with the same
corrupt «judge», who proposes me, all smiles, to place my daughter
in another family, under the pretext of very benign «hygiene
problems» anyway solved since long ago. It is clear that what
disturbed this «judge» was in the sexual domain, that
a man could raise alone a girl... I definitively refused. The discussion
was rather stormy, but he gave up, not without threatening me with
«new denunciations».

Of course in this hearing, I stayed polite,
while speaking in a firm tone, a thing that never misses to impress
childish peoples. But the Lamrim
meditations also acted... without forgetting that, with such a serious
skate (the psychological unfolding of children) I did other things
that the gentle Lamrim meditations.

This «judge» anyway allowed himself a last
prank, stating in his final «order» that his measures
did not worked because of «my belonging to Buddhism».

We can have some wonder about what happens
in really serious cases, if this «judge» can be so easily
impressed...

A constant behaviour of all these peoples was
to repeat all their fantasms the the mother of my children, who swallowed
all, and from this completely renounced to visit her children!!! Whatever
the problem with this mother, I was sincerely shocked to see her brought
(by mind control) to be disgusted by her own children, to the point
of even not visiting them...

The consequences of this judiciary harassment
were also tremendous for my children, who really suffered and had
a very negative evolution during that time, rejecting all the positive
values I proposed them, and going so far as to get interested into
the hip-hop-punk fascism. Now that the horror has stopped, they evolve
again, but I think they took about one year in late, and that they
have forever lost a certain candour that even the sect had left untouched.

GENERAL CONCERNS ABOUT CHILDREN WELFARE

Those who want to keep thinking
that only exotic sects
or far dictatures use mind control, ought better not to read this page.
They would see how, in France, country however democratic and respectuous
of human rights, some French civil servants and magistrates, acting in
their legal duties, can, completely unpunished, show as much manipulating,
liar and dangerous than the worse sects, and this, how courageous, against
children! Please that nobody tries to get around the point: I criticize
here the persons who abuse of their power, not the institutions themselves.

The problem I speak about here begins to appear
on the public scene. It is about certain children welfare services,
of their archaism, of their cruelty. I must tell here, while accusing
civil servants and magistrates, that this is a testimony, in the judiciary
meaning of this word. The facts are authentic, the material facts and
the psychological feeling of the protagonists as well. But the normal
citizen rights, especially of defence, not being ensured in this peculiar
domain, I cannot tell names: my own security, and that of my children,
would not be guaranteed. It is also understandable that I do not tell
the names of my children, and do not publish certain specially improper
aspects of the affair, but I am ready to give all these details to any
inquirer, at need under oath, and with all the evidences I possess.
This page is really personal, but the problem it speaks about is the
concern of thousand of families. So, in the name of all the victims,
I cannot stay silent. So I speak for all the children who, screaming
with distress, has seen one day one (or two) of their parents going
away; I speak for all who, their brain slowly destroyed, ended to believe
that one of their parents was the evil; I speak for all those who never
built their personality, deprived of any love and education in casual
families, or in administrative lebensborn; I speak for all those who
will never speak, their very soul broken, feeling hopelessly culprit,
made dumb, excluded, suicided...

The today problem of children welfare in France
probably started with the Vichy government(1940-1944 war): the epoch
testimonies show the great moral cruelty the war orphans had to face
(confinement, depersonalization, stalking, deprivation of love, no education
other than strictly school... See the movie «Jeux interdits») As in
many other domains, the Liberation preferred to «forgive» and hide the
problem, more than to try to solve it, in such a way that the epoch
executives were still in place, rotting the institution until today.

In the 1970' I several times encountered persons,
especially young women, who were «coming from the DASS» (French children
and orphan welfare state service). A striking fact, very painful to
observe, is that they all exhibited very visible symptoms of serious
educative lacks: infantilism (like eight childen in affection, intelligence
and school level), inability to love or to assume their emotions, complete
absence of any professional training, and even complete absence of any
knowledge of sexuality: these women were thrown into the street at 18,
without even knowing the consequences of the sexual act! and of course,
half of them had become pregnant from the first encountered boor (at
best, those who were lucky enough not to be trapped in a brothel) without
any psychological nor material mean to assume this situation. From this
they were in turn «monitored» by «social workers», threatening
them to withdraw their child at the least pretext... At this epoch,
extreme-right small groups had their dens in... law high school! (Assas
in Paris, and also in Toulouse). So it is not surprising that «magistrates»
with such a «training» had absolutely no worries about human rights,
and even not of right itself.

In the 2000's the debate comes into the public,
and ONGs and the European Human Right Council start to point at the
serious problems about the children judges in France, while associations
of victims begin to grow, especially of fathers who were victims of
the sexism of «judges». Many parents, especially unfairly excluded fathers,
feel deprived of their children. But we should not confuse the issues:
It is not the parents who need their children, but the children who
need their TWO parents. In such conditions, the only and unique victims
of a discrimination on any of the two parents are the children. Taken
as hostages, offered in sacrifice to ideologies and corporatist interests
far beyond their life, crushed into administrative gears run by insensitive
individual living far away of reality...

WHO ALLOWS SUCH SITUATIONS TO HAPPEN?

The fact that «civil
servants» and «magistrates» can so much pervert their duty and use it
for personal purposes (repression and inquisition against philosophical
views different of theirs, see very common racism and gender discrimination)
already arises a serious problem. But it is still personal problems,
about only the individuals who create them. The French law is intended
to punish all these corrupted practices: defamation, intimidation, discrimination
as a function of gender or of philosophical choices, falsification of
judiciary documents, false testimony, abuse of power, abuse of authority
on children by persons having a teaching role, see a judiciary power...
for you and me, play with this would lead us straight in jail.

But the problem takes a much larger scale when
we undertake to denounce it. We soon note that the whole system of
children protection behaves in a vicious way:

No real defence of the victims (Nor the spoiled
parents, and even far less the broken children), especially:

«secret» files of the children
judges, which put this institution out of the law and bring to France
the shame of being showed at the finger by human rights organizations.
(«My» file contains numerous defamatory or falsified documents, but,
without paper copies of these documents, I cannot carry complain for
defamation or falsification. For this reason I shall consider as accomplice
any person or institution who will «use» these documents) (About secret
files see here
the position of the ministry (French),
interesting, but still at the stage of a project, and the position
of the Commission Nationale Consultative
des Droits de l'Homme (French))

Magistrates are legally irresponsible (we
cannot carry complaint against a magistrate!!! It seems that he could
even become mad, and nobody could do nothing...)

Impunity of civil servants (a problem which
is not specific to children services!);

Clan mind very common among all this people,
that brings a bunch of idiots to cover the faults of their peers,
so that «not to feel accused»;

Argumentation which takes refuge «in the
psychological» (we cannot hear at you, as «we cannot judge on
psychological facts». On the other hand if you complain, one
shall not miss to say that it is because you have a psychological
problem)

No training in psychology for the interveners
(especially THEY NEVER ACCOMPLISHED THEIR OWN ANALYSIS, and this allows
to hire psychotics, perverts,
stalkers, ideologists, sexists, racists, fascists, persons with sexual
phobias...)

Spinelessness of politicians who refuse to
consider the problem (a «socialist» deputy who tells me that the government
does not want to change the law. Sorry, but if this person is a representative
of the government and not of the citizens of her circonscription,
she will never have my vote...)

Etc etc...

I do not think that we must globally reform
the children protection system, in France; but it is quite clear that
we are here in a situation where perverts
regularly and massively use the law and institution as chains to torture
at ease their (young) victims. And that they do this with the complicity
of a majority who refuses to live into reality. So, what looks to
me of the utmost importance, to avoid such a situation, is that magistrates,
inquirers and teachers must be recruited on criteria such as their
honesty, ideological neutrality, psychological maturity (to have mastered
ordinary neurosis, TO HAVE COMPLETED THEIR OWN PSYCHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS.)
As we do with airliner pilots. And that, in a domain which is never
exact, they must undergo a constant monitoring (psychological examination
at taking-on, statistical
monitoring, real appeal for the victims of abuses, liability,
punishment and dismissal for offenders...)

It is also quite clear that a vague notion
such as «the interest of the child» must be much more clearly
defined, in order not to give rise to fanciful personal interpretations.
The child needs hygiene and school, admittedly, but he also, and especially,
needs LOVE, and social recognition. He needs to be happy in a STABLE
way with his TWO parents, and also to have a cultural, spiritual...
identity. He especially badly needs that all those who find these
notions «hardly defined» or «irrational» must not have no more involvement
in children welfare services than to sweep the offices.

A very common feature that I observed at last
in two départements is that the inquiry methods (French)
are completely fanciful. The reports I possess are very clearly stalking
texts. One of the more common fault is of course the lie, even coarse.
If the victim tries to refute these lies, they are so numerous that
this gives the feeling that it is the victim who exaggerates or is
paranoid. These lies are often no-refutable, and even when they are,
they are not judiciary refutable: you have to archive during years
evidences and testimonies... which will be returned to you in a block
with the conclusion that you exceedingly love procedures. The second
more common fault is psychological interpretation: all what you say
come from a problem you have: jealousy, paranoia, desire of revenge,
mental rigidity.... At last the third fault, also constant, in most
cases I witnessed, the inquirers or report writers from the beginning
clearly took side for one of the protagonists of the case (what is
already a great professional misdemeanour, and anyway a clear aggression
against the child). Then they do only to interpret the elements they
find, selecting and magnifying what support their thesis, «forgetting»
or distorting what goes against. If a statement disturbs their thesis,
it is written «X pretend that...» but if another statement
reinforce this thesis, you read «the fact is that...».
We lose grip on the very notion of reality, we live in a world of
malicious gossip transformed in facts, of suppositions raised to the
rank of certitudes. Also, it seems in many cases, that these peoples
has a very simplistic conception of life, similar to what we see in
idiotic TV series: An abandoned spouse «takes revenge», the parents
«want» their child, we «belong» to a religion, if we are «not like
everybody» it is because we have «a problem» and all this kind of
things... If the «inquirer» take side for the accuser,
this accuser is «realistic» and the defender «culprit». If the «inquirer»
takes side for the defender, it is the accuser who will be «paranoid.»
and the defender «persecuted»...

But the most indecent in this is the perverse
use made of the children's words. A child has his own sufferings and
doubts to express, and also his joys and hopes. Often he is serious,
sometimes he jokes, other times he confabulates or he repeats what
he has heard. What does all this becomes after passing through the
pervert vegetable mill? At first no matter if what the child says
is true or not: if «what the child says» goes in the way the «inquirer»
wants, thus it is «revealing». It it goes against, it is «confabulation».
If the child charges you (even a joke, a trifle) it is accepted against
you; if he speaks in favour of you, it is that you manipulated him.
It is exactly as with the inquisition: whatever you do, whatever you
say, it goes against you. As for the child, anyway his real demand
will be always ignored.

It is clear that we are here in the domain
of the most banal and most characterized perversity, the one Marie France
Hirigoyen describes all along her book.

The objective inquiry methods are however well
known, in the judiciary police or gendarmerie (French military corps
assuming a police role in countryside and small towns) or in science.
The eventual adaptations in the «psychology» domain are also
known in psychology and psychoanalysis, and what I say about this
in my «General
Epistemology» book should end up any quibbling over the
subject.

As for the «secret file» and other methods
from before 1789, my opinion is that it places us in the same situation
than the Vichy (French «government» during the nazi occupation)
laws which compelled us to denounce Jews: this law is simply null
and void, and it is those who obey it who commit an offence. As for
myself, I place them all into the same bin than those who obeyed the
anti-Jews laws. (To note that I saw a Castres judge not accounting
with this file, probably knowing in what extend its content is rotten)
(To note that, in certain cases, for instance children denouncing
their parents, it must be possible to decide to protect them by secrecy.
But it is with this as for the medical secrecy: it must not be used
to hide professional misdemeanours)

Some may think that I am «against» the children
welfare services, or «against» the justice. Sorry, but
in fact this page was a psychology test: if you think this, that means
that you did not passed this test: you suffer of a dualistic mind.
Quite on the contrary, I think that children welfare services are
very useful, and that they even should intervene more often, or more
firmly... advisedly. The only fact that I criticize is that these
institutions may be used as instruments by perverts, by ideological
«re-educators» or by imbeciles. There anyway exist in these institutions
great stature characters (some children judges wrote very interesting
books) and I especially wish to congratulate:

The Foncaude centre at Montpellier, where
my son started to enjoy life again;

The gendarmes of Saint Laurent de Cerdans,
for their tact in a delicate situation;

The PJJ in Perpignan, who from the very start
excluded the «ideological aspect» and at that time perfectly understood
the situation, but without real means to efficiently intervene;

A centre of the AGOP which name I shall not
tell, from modesty about my children;

Several magistrates who intervened into the
case;

The French children judges who had the idea
to work with ethnologists, in cases involving African immigrates.
To do an African palaver in the judge's office (with the tamtam?)
may seem funny, but this gave immediate and total solutions to problems
of serious violence. Normal: we always communicate better with peoples
if we consider them as they are, in place of trying to first cast
them into a preestablished mould.

All those who try, despite all this, to make
their work correctly, intervening when children need it, taking back
a modest profile when things get in order, as to work for children
is really the most beautiful occupation of the world! I think that
the best award would be to encounter, years after, somebody we helped,
and who became happy, who accomplished his life.

PROTECTING THE INTEREST OF THE CHILD

I cannot end this page without
mentioning a problem closely relating the previous: family separations.
It is understandable that peoples who are no longer happy together get
separated, but in this case they still have to assume what they began
together: their children. We cannot divorce of our children, as they
have a VITAL NEED of loving parents. Of their TWO parents. So it exists
couples who part away like this, but who continue to raise together
their children, trying to bring them all what they need despite distance
and alternating custody.

The problem here is that, in some cases, and even in many cases,
the persons in such a situation do not know to manage this situation.
So the children become hostages, bargaining counters. (For instance
in my case, to forbid me to meet them, in such a way that, to obtain
a right of access, I had to go in court, where a demand for an alimony
awaited me...) Even in some cases, to make them suffer or break their
unfolding becomes a blackmail method or a revenge against the rejected
spouse (as one cannot reach him directly). We fall here in forms of
perversity such as denounced by Marie France Hirigoyen in her book, and which take
an especially abject form when a mother destroys her own child. The
victims here are, of course, always the children, who are always victim
of any injury to any of their two parents.

As these situations are more and more common, we cannot stay with
the court as the only answer (in most cases it is just one more weapon
in the hand of the perverts, and it anyway does not have the power
to bring real solutions to the substance, the heart of the cases).
So I think that any honest person, from right wing to extreme-left
wing, traditional or progressist, atheist or from any religion, can
only subscribe to the following emergency steps:

1) The interest of the child is to enjoy material and psychological
conditions favouring the development of all the aspects of his personality,
physical, emotional, intellectual, moral, spiritual. These conditions
include the LOVE of his TWO parents, whatever they are his genetic
parents or any other substitute: his love parents. These conditions
include the tenderness of BREAST FEEDING, a gentle and harmonious
atmosphere, and an incitement to bring a positive participation to
the group and the society. They must also include whatever the parents
have to bring in positive in the cultural, social, philosophical or
spiritual domains. These notions are known since prehistory, and those
who find them «ununderstandable» or «hardly defined» must
be excluded of any activity concerning childhood.

2) Any couple intending to have children should benefit of a psychological
and educational training.

3) Any family where a problem appears must enjoy a psychological
counselling, aiming at maintaining conditions favouring the interest
of the children.

4) If the problem gets too hard to be solved, so any procedure, judiciary
or other, must keep for first purpose to safeguard the interest
of the child before anything else. Authoritarian measures must
be considered if and only if this interest is seriously compromised,
and only with the purpose of protecting this interest. The child is
not the property of the parents, but their responsibility.

5) Any person who creates nasty material or psychological conditions
toward her spouse or children (included while denigrating the other
parent) must be considered at fault, and at need be deprived of her
parental rights and punished.

6) If a child is temporarily deprived of one or two of his parents,
so he must enjoy a stable and loving spare family.

7) If this deprivation of parents is definitive or does not have
any predictable end, so adoption is imperative. This practice must
no more be discouraged, especially when there are many children awaiting
for an adoption family. There are no «non-adoptable» children.
There are no such things as «blood law» nor «genetic link» which
would justify ill-treatments like affective deprivation, on a child
separated from his genetic parents.

8) The lebensborn («orphanages» or «centres» sequestrating children
in situation of affective deprivation, without education nor social
life) must be closed. Torture (to frequently change of family, to
stalk) blackmail (normative delirium, inquisition, repressive «psychiatry»)
psychological mutilations (from lack of real education) and hijackings
(abusive withdrawal) must be abolished, and the culprits punished.
The laws for this exist.

9) The certification of potential reception families or adoptive
families must not be conditioned by ideological criteria, such as
excluding vegans of adepts of a religion. On the contrary each children
must find a suitable environment. Peoples who find «questionable»
the fact that we could be vegan or religious must be excluded of any
activity concerning children protection.

10) The authoritarian decisions eventually necessary to safeguard
the interest of the children must be entrusted to magistrates
(children judge and family affair judge) who comply to the general
principles of republican law and of human rights (no secret unverifiable
files, real defence, realistic appeal and liable in case of abuse)

11) The inquiry methods has to be rational (methods used by the police
or in sciences). The psychological or emotional aspects can also be
understood with already known scientific methods (psychology, psychometry),
by the normal human sensitivity (hearing, a thing which has to be
done without prejudice nor ideological a priori) or by new methods
allowing a rational approach in the domain of the mind (see my book
«General
Epistemology»).

12) Magistrates, civil servants, teachers, educators, inquirers,
etc... are selected on their honesty, elementary human sensitivity,
political, social or religious neutrality, and controlled (psychological
examinations, quality assessment, statistics
of results) and responsible (realistic appeal for victims of abuse,
legal punishment and laying-off in case of abuse). All these measures
has to be accomplished by psychologically healthy peoples, as if we
do again the same mistake of entrusting again these new measures to
perverts, idiots or ideologists,
so it is useless to make so much efforts: we could only worsen the
situation. We know only too much what certain persons mean with «psychological
monitoring»...

The french Outreau scandal:
Af if they heeded me...

The french Outreau case was a major
scandal, that we could compare to the Dreyfus case, and which considerably
lowered the repute of the french justice and children welfare services.

(Added on July 30, 2008)

In december 2000 I sent to the justice ministry a letter describing what
took place in my case(with the names). Of course, I got no reply. But this
letter (among many others) had at least one result: justice was aware that a scandal
like Outreau was perfectly possible.

To well understand the Outreau scandal, it must be compared to the Allègre
case: starting 2004, some small gangsters of Toulouse, caught for a sordid murder,
take revenge with flooding with rubish and slander the most well known notable
of toulouse: Dominique Baudis. An inquiry takes place, which soon exempts sir Baudis.
the gangsters earned only one more charge in the bargain.

The Outreau case is very similar:
small children fiddlers were nabbed, and to take revenge they also accused all
the neighbourhood. But after came astonishing differences:

Without any checking, people were jailed and children deprived of their families.

Tens of children were psychologically abused so that they would
confirm the fabrications of the accusators.

This lasted more than three years, without nobody doing nothing, despites
the obvious sufferings of the victims (suicides, hunger strikes), accused persons and
children as well, that however one claimed to «protect».

Were condemned people who were obviously innocents, or when there were serious
doubts.

This Outreau scandal arises, much more than my small affair,
the problem of the impunity of magistrates and the competence of some
«specialistes», who provoked much more suffering than the one they
claimed to protect the protect the children. And if we do nothing, there wil
be many other Outreau, small or large, and many other innocent people
accused and broken children.

The «inquiry methodsraquo; of some «specialists» arise
very serious problems. In the United States, where took place incredible cases,
such the one of
Bobby Fijnje (A 14 youngster accussed by a whole district of sex-cannibal rituals while
flying through the window in company of witches),
Grant Snowden,
Ileana Fuster, the Orwellian methods to obtain false «testimonies»
are described by the
Dr Stephen Ceci. They are really stunning:

To interview a great number of time a great number of children: one alway finds
one who confirms (Confirmation bias)

To play with the child to do «as if the accused had realy done»,
and make him repeat the told scene or account a great number of times, until he
knows it by heart. Then, film it, and show this video to the jurors, while
saying it is a «testimony»...

Psychologicaly rape the child, with presenting him
«anatomic dolls» to induce sexual scenarios.

Use «therapy» methods to make «come out»
the desired account (Conditionning method used at Outreau).

Left the children free to exchange at school, in the playground, so that their
accounts don't appear too much contradictory (Conditionning method used at Outreau).

We can only shiver to the psychological consequenceson such abused children,
who no more know what is truth or lie. Or whom first love experience was a sadistic
game where sex is presented like the ultimate evil...
THE PEOPLE WHO DO THIS ARE DANGEROUS SADICS. They are NEW INQUISITORS,
they are ANOTHER KIND OF PAEDOPHILIACS.

NOTES

Sect:
any group or organization which proposes false spiritual or psychological
practices, or which has purposes out of moral principles. Who speaks
about sect speaks about mind control. But why are these mind control
techniques so difficult to show? Because they are not used only in the
sects: most are very well known and a very common use, even by peoples
who claim to be «into the society». Thus, if we want to denounce sects,
perhaps it is better to first sweep our own doorstep... It is what I
do in this page. I speak of mind control in my book «General
Epistemology» chapter 63. See the link page on
mind control

Marie
France Hirigoyen, psychiatist and specialist of the victims, wrote
a very interesting book, about how to twart daily mind control harassment:
«
Stalking the soul». This book describes how certain persons(called
narcissic perverts) can, using only psychologicl methods, harass us
and destroy us slowly, so far as breaking families or suicide. Using
the theories of this book, my testimony on this page shows how such
kind of perverts can divert their institutionnal role and harass children
in place of helping them, using the law only as a mean for their pervert
personnal purpose. See the link page on
mind control

TheLamrim
is the basis of the Tibetan Buddhist path: the graduated path toward
awakening, the progressive approach, starting from the simplest correct
motive. What I precisely speak about here is what I call the «spiritual
Judo»: the efficient way to react to sufferings we encouter in life.
Heyhey, that works very well! See the link page on Tibetan
Buddhism