Submissions must link directly to a specific image file or to a website with minimal ads. No blog hosting of images ("blogspam"), but albums on image hosting sites are okay. URL shorteners are prohibited.

No text/self posts, gifs, videos, etc.

No memes, comics, "posters", image macros, etc. Submissions with text overlays, screenshots with large amounts of text, infographics, and similar posts must have emphasis on the picture itself and not the text/chart/symbol/etc.

No gore, porn, or distasteful nudity. This includes jailbait-type material. NSFW content must be marked, but at this time only mods can assign flairs. Please tag @ElNino in any submissions that require marking.

Guidelines

Please try to keep submissions more applicable to another community in the correct subverse, such as /v/politics or /v/funny, with /v/whatever as a catch-all.

Try to avoid reposts. Check the "New" queue to see if what you're posting has already been posted. Reposts will be tagged or removed.

Make some mention of what is in the picture when coming up with your title.

Please try to link directly to the image rather than to the host page (i.e. make the only thing you can see in the browser be the picture itself, no links/comments/etc) and have the URL end with the file type (.png, .jpeg). These aren't required but it seems to make the experience more user friendly for everyone and plays nicer with Voat's inline image viewer.

I searched and literally the only thing I can find is the decision where his defamation claim is dismissed, and the original piece the Gazette wrote on him. Here is a link to the decision, which contains the full article. I can't find anything else online verifying this chan screenshot. Nothing on a female reporter suing him, no articles other than the original, and no Gazette articles about the judge in the defamation case. Also nothing about Ramos losing his job. Adding this sentence so I'm not blocked from posting the same comment twice.

I used to listen to loveline nightly from about 99 to 203. they got lots of outlandish calls and ones that didn't make any sense, but the ones that were bogus 99% of the time were the ones where the story fit too well.

I would love to run with this narrative, but I need sources for each part of this otherwise it will be picked apart. It's like programmers that don't document their code, I get that they know how the code works, but I don't.

I know I don't have it but it would be par for course here. The courts in Maryland are insanely corrupt and broken and they always break to protect niggers and to persecute men on any claim from women.

I'm beginning to believe that journalists are the most hideous cowards in America, ruthlessly passive-aggressive self-anointed bullies who abjectly fucking run from accountability before the first whiff of it gets to them.

(((Journalism))), not journalism. Actual real journalism requires investigation, verification of sources & claims, research, the ability to form connections & network, a sense of tact, an ability to suppress personal bias and look at things objectively, and finally the ability to NOT be a lying sack of shit & an unhinged bully with an over-inflated ego and a chip on your shoulder.

(((Journalism))) is sitting on your fat ass all day in front of a computer, drinking soy lattes and being a snippy effeminate bitch who seeks to ruin the careers & lives of political opponents, critics and people you didn't like in high school all while exercising that streak of mean girl/bully vitriol like you're still a junior in high school - even thought you're fucking 35. In short, being a Jew.

“We’ve run this content before,” Ms. Hasson said. “I supported it, and I supported the publishing of the info.”

“As journalists, we are prepared for criticism,” Ms. Hasson said, as she sat in her meticulously tended office and described the ways her 225 employees have been harassed since the article was published. “But in the U.S., journalists should not be threatened.”

Perfect example of self-entitled unaccountability right here.

In my opinion, if a journalist intimidates a private citizen by publicizing personal information, then journalistic ethics don't apply, and the fucking rules are off. Game on.

Hmm the youtube shooter was a disgruntled after being demonetized, Gazette shooter was a demonized critic that lost his job. Why do I feel like there might be a lot of these people that pop up soon? These situations seem rather common. Particularly after all this civil war talk, if that happens these people will be the first targets of a lot of rioters and militias.

That's the purpose of "deplatforming" and employment shunning people for being unashamedly white or failing to conform to a communist line: to disconnect people and destabilize them. If their goal is to destroy the West, it's working.