agnostiscm>athiesm. Athiesm is more inclined to think there tehre is no god seeing as the word in greek is (without god" i dont wanna hear bs of my arguement being a strawman arguement. The only logical beleif is the beleif that anyhting is possible. Because you woudnt know otherwise

You do realize that much of what we "know" is based on calculations of probability, right? So it's pretty stupid to say that if we don't have 100% metaphysical certitude in X, that we shouldn't believe X. If we did, we'd be pretty well fucked.

The Nobel Prize in Physics

I find it hard to belive that the little ball that exploded simply was there, like that, by magic.

There was no little ball. There was no explosion.

The bloke down the hall has just receive the Nobel Prize for Physics for discovering that it is space that is expanding at an accelerating rate.

The Big Bang is a sop to those of a religious disposition, who start with an a priori belief in God, and so it make sense to them that God created the Big Bang.

The Big Bang is so anthropromorphic, surely that would make us suspicious. But no, we are here because we believe in a fake personality test, so why not go the whole hog and believe in God and the His Big Bang. Gosh, we were created by our father's big bang, so naturally we think the universe was created by God's Big Bang.

Unfortunately there is no evidence for God and His Big Bang, while the evidence for space expanding at an accelerating rate is so strong as to merit the Nobel Prize in Physics.

I find it hard to belive that the little ball that exploded simply was there, like that, by magic.

Not a little ball, but a singularity. Before that point there was not time. I'm not an expert in physics, but I know enough that trying to place events of origin in continuous linear time doesn't make much sense, but we are driven to do it because that is how we perceive reality.

There is a great deal that human beings don't understand and possibly cannot understand. There isn't any other form of life we can observe that has the ability to comprehend everything that is, and so it is a mis-step to assume humans have that ability. The question of god is bigger than what we can address definitively, but only if deconstructed to the point that we aren't trying to assign specific definitions to what god is. The more specific the parameters we place on the concept of god, the greater the burden to prove it and the less likely it is of existing. When you follow this reasoning, you deconstruct the concept back to a point of the indefinable.

Step into my metaphysical room of mirrors. Fear of reality creates myopic moralitySo I guess it means there is trouble until the robins come
(from Blue Velvet)