If by "best" you mean completely wrong on multiple levels and utterly useless then yes it is the "best". Nothing wrong with simplifying a concept but if you do such in such a manner that you make completely false statements that kinda defeats the purpose.

If by "best" you mean completely wrong on multiple levels and utterly useless then yes it is the "best". Nothing wrong with simplifying a concept but if you do such in such a manner that you make completely false statements that kinda defeats the purpose.

If by "best" you mean completely wrong on multiple levels and utterly useless then yes it is the "best". Nothing wrong with simplifying a concept but if you do such in such a manner that you make completely false statements that kinda defeats the purpose.

If by "best" you mean completely wrong on multiple levels and utterly useless then yes it is the "best". Nothing wrong with simplifying a concept but if you do such in such a manner that you make completely false statements that kinda defeats the purpose.

+1

-1

It's a joke people. Maybe not funny to you, everyone has their own sense of humor, but I didn't expect anybody to think it was serious. Miners are trying to fill in missing pixels in a booby picture? Really...