>In other words:
>
>"NetBSD is not POSIX."
>
>We are mostly POSIX-compliant, but not 100% in the command department.
>I don't even think we are 100% POSIX-compliant in the interface department.
>There is probably some very good reasoning for this.
>
So what part of POSIX said one can't extend the commands? Oh yeah..it doesn't
last time I read through the specs.
It is entirely possible to be standards conforming *and* provide extentions..
James