Here is another challenge to journalists regarding 911. We know that 1120 families buried empty coffins. At the same time we know there are approximately 9000 human remains on 'frozen for future analysis.' The question is, why are current DNA techniques inadequate to identify who these remains belonged to? And why has no one in the media asked this question? The issue is discussed here: http://smu.gs/L8pTCz

You will have 2 excuse my ignorance if I have misunderstood this, I'm just becoming familiar with Jennings testimony after watching the most recent Loose Change. If what you are saying is that the explosions Barry heard was a controlled demolition that caused WTC7 to collapse then why the delay between them & the collapse? Anyone knows that after the explosives are detonated the building being demolished collapses almost immediately. Yet Barry himself says he remained in the building for a period after he heard the explosions. Is there any precedent for a building being detonated, yet the collapse being delayed by such a length of time?

Many CD's have bombs going off before the actual collapse occurs. It is a step by step process, slowly weaken parts until a threshold is met, then the final columns are removed. There is also the possible misfires, and I also believe others techniques, ie explosive-less verinage were incorporated. Either way, whatever was used, structural failure cannot explain any of the towers free fall, symmetric global collapse.

"Is there any precedent for a building being detonated, yet the collapse being delayed by such a length of time"

Not all CD's have synchronized explosions, some with large time spans. While it isnt clear what was used, each explosion could be 'setting up' by removing certain columns floor trusses etc. The building slowly gets weaker, once the set up is done, the final detonation sends the buildings down.

Both Peter Jennings and Dan Rather made comments on 09/11/01, after seeing the collapse of WTC7. The comments were along the lines of "This looks like the kind of controlled demolitions that we've all seen before, where they use dynamite to take down a building intentionally.". NIST never tested for explosives. Why wouldn't they, if for no other reason than to rule it out?

We found that many people who have an excuse for refusing to examine false flag evidence for 911 are open to this human interest story. We're going to continue bannering at grad schools of journalism (50 in US) and independently owned US newspapers (we need help getting this list). Conference call Tuesday, September 22, 2009 at 9PM EDT/ 6PM PDT at 712-775-7300 access code: 593930#
questions? davidslesinger@yahoo.com
Here's the link to the Us journalism schools
http://www.journalismschools.com/

Help honor Barry by bannering at your local newspaper on the anniversary of his death

Wed., Aug. 19, 2009 is the first anniversary of the mysterious death of key 9/11 eyewitness Barry Jennings. To make a commitment to banner outside your local news outlet that day, email to: JenningsMystery@yahoo.comThe banner should read: "JenningsMystery.com" or "JenningsMystery.com How did he die?" (We also give banner construction advice and assistance.)