Stolen Harvest

The Hijacking of the Global Food Supply

In Stolen Harvest, Vandana Shiva describes how industrial agriculture steals food
from nature and poor people. She urges us to reclaim our right to protect the earth and her
diverse species. Food democracy, she says, is the new agenda for ecological sustainability
and social justice.

Quotes from Stolen Harvest

Over the past two decades every issue I have been engaged in as an ecological activist and
organic intellectual has revealed that what the industrial economy calls "growth" is really
a form of theft from nature and people.

It is true that cutting down forests or converting natural forests into monocultures of
pine and eucalyptus for industrial raw material generates revenues and growth. But this growth
is based on robbing the forest of its biodiversity and its capacity to conserve soil and
water. This growth is based on robbing forest communities of their sources of food, fodder,
fuel, fiber, medicine, and security from floods and drought.

While most environmentalists can recognize that converting a natural forest into a monoculture
is an impoverishment, many do not extend this insight to industrial agriculture. A corporate
myth has been created, shared by most mainstream environmentalists and development organizations,
that industrial agriculture is necessary to grow more food and reduce hunger. Many also assume
that intensive, industrial agriculture saves resources and, therefore, saves species. But
in agriculture as much as in forestry, the growth illusion hides theft from nature and the
poor, masking the creation of scarcity as growth.

These thefts have only stepped up since the advent of the globalized economy. The completion
of the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and TRade (GATT) in 1994 and the
establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO) have institutionalized and legalized
corporate growth based on harvests stolen from nature and people. The WTO's Trade Related
Intellectual Property Rights criminalizes seed-saving and seed-sharing. The Agreement on
Agriculture legalizes the dumping of genetically engineered foods on countries and criminalizes
actions to protect the biological and cultural diversity on which diverse food systems are
based.

...

I focus on India to tell the story of how corporate control of food and globalization of
agriculture are robbing millions of their livelihoods and their right to food both because
I am an Indian and because Indian agriculture is being especially targeted by global corporations.
Since 75 percent of the Indian population derives its livelihood from agriculture, and every
fourth farmer in the world is an Indian, the impact of globalization on Indian agriculture
agriculture is of global significance.

However, this phenomenon of the stolen harvest is not unique to India. It is being experienced
in every society, as small farms and small farmers are pushed to extinction, as monocultures
replace biodiverse crops, as farming is transformed from the production of nourishing and
diverse foods into the creation of markets for genetically engineered seeds, herbicides,
and pesticides. As farmers are transformed from producers into consumers of coporate-patented
agricultural products, as markets are destoryed locally and nationally but expanded globally,
the myth of "free trade" and the global economy becomes a means for the rich to
rob the poor of their right to food and even their right to life. For the vast majority of
the world's people--70 percent--earn their livelihoods by producing food. The majority of
these farmers are women. In contrast, in the industrialized countries, only 2 percent of
the population are farmers.

...

Industrial agriculture has not produced more food. It has destroyed diverse sources of food,
and it has stolen food from other species to bring larger quantities of specific commodities
to the market using huge quantities of fossil fuels and water and toxic chemicals in the
process.

It is often said that the so-called miracle varieties of the Green Revolution in modern
industrial agriculture prevented famine becuse they had higher yields. However, these higher
yields disappear in the context of total yields of crops on farms. Green Revolution varieties
produced more grain by diverting production away from straw. This "partitioning" was
achieved through dwarfing the plants, which also enabled them to withstand high doses of
chemical fertilizer.

However, less straw means less fodder for cattle and less organic matter for the soil to
feed the millions of soil organisms that make and rejuvenate soil. The higher yields of wheat
or maize were thus achieved by stealing food from farm animals and soil organisms. Since
cattle and earthworms are our partners in food production, stealing food from them makes
it impossible to maintain food production over time, and means that the partial yield increases
were not sustainable.

The increase in yields of wheat and maize under industrial agriculture were also achieved
at the cost of yields of other foods a small farm provides. Beans, legumes, fruits, and vegetables
all disappeared both from farms and from the calculus of yields. More grain from two or three
commodities arrived on national and international markets, but less food was eaten by farm
families in the Third World.

The gain in "yields" of industrially produced crops is thus based on a theft of
food from other species and the rural poor in the Third World. That is why, as more grain
is produced and traded globally, more people go hungry in the Third World. Global markets
have more commodities for trading because food has been robbed from nature and the poor.
. . .

A study comparing traditional polycultures with industrial monocultures shows that a polyculture
system can produce 100 units of food from 5 units of inputs, whereas an industiral system
requires 300 units of input to produce the same 100 units. The 295 units of wasted inputs
could have provided 5,900 units of additional food. Thus the industrial system leads to a
decline of 5,900 units of food. This is a recipe for starving people, not for feeding them.

...

Indigenous oilseeds, being high in oil content, are easy to process at small-scale, decentralized
levels with eco-friendly and health-friendly technologies … The bulk of oilseed processing
is done by over 1 million ghanis (expellers) and 20,000 small and tiny crushers that account
for 68 percent of edible oils processed … Women in the bastis, or slums, usually buy
small quantities of mustard oil extracted on their local ghani in front of their eyes…Yet
these community-based systems of food and health safety were quickly dismantled in the name
of food safety in 1998, when local processing of mustard oil was banned and free imports
of soybean oil were installed in response to a mysterious contamination of Delhi’s
edible-oil supply.

...

The environmental destruction caused by intensive shrimp farming is one of the major factors
for its spread in Third World countries, even though the main consumers of shrimp live in
affluent countries. In country after country where commercial shrimp fishing has been tried,
it has proven unsustainable. For this reason, this industry is known as a ‘rape and
run’ industry.

...

Indigenous cattle do not compete with humans for food; rather, they provide organic fertilizer
for fields and thus enhance food productivity. Within the sacredness of the cow lie this
ecological rationale and conservation imperative. The cow is a source of cow-dung energy,
nutrition, and leather, and its contribution is linked to the work of women in feeding and
milking cows, collecting cow dung, and nurturing sick cows to health.

...

The right of corporations to force-feed citizens of the world with culturally inappropriate
and hazardous foods has been made absolute [in the globalizing economy]. The right to food,
the right to safety, the right to culture are all being treated as trade barriers that need
to be dismantled…we have to reclaim our right to nutrition and food safety. We have to reclaim
our right to protect the earth and her diverse species. We have to stop this corporate theft
from the poor and from nature. Food democracy…is the new agenda for ecological sustainability
and social justice.

...

The time has come to reclaim the stolen harvest and celebrate the growing and giving of
good food as the highest gift and most revolutionary act.

Table of Contents of Stolen Harvest

Introduction Piracy Through Patents: The Second Coming of Columbus

Chapter One The Hijacking of the Global Food Supply

Chapter Two Soy Imperialism and the Destruction of Local Food Cultures