Tears for Fears: Songs of the Cold War

Memorable pop hits influenced by Cold War tensions are a timely reminder that Russophobia is one sad song.

It was the age of Rambo, Red Dawn, and Tom Cruise chasing bogeys at full throttle in Top Gun: the 1980s were a maelstrom of post-imperial paranoia where fear of nuclear annihilation spawned the laughable folly of Britain's "nuclear free zones" and passive acceptance, even gratitude, for the US military presence in Europe.

In such a depressing milieu, British teenagers sought escape from the gray existence of unemployment in pop subcultures that included the tiny ballads of the New Romantics to the guttural anarchy of Punk Rock.

And yet, pop itself from Kate Bush's 'Breathing' to Iron Maiden's '2 Minutes to Midnight' were marbled with Cold War induced anguish.

In Britain, Frankie Goes to Hollywood's 'Two Tribes' explicitly referenced the pointlessness of conflict between the Soviet Union and the United States. The song opened with an eerie air raid siren that had the unnerving ability to sound all too real after a few drinks.

West Germany's Nena sang of a nuclear exchange sparked by nothing more sinister than a boy and a girl innocently releasing some red balloons into the sky. NATO's response was to go nuclear in a dirty tide of joy: 'The war machine springs to life, opens up one eager eye, focusing it on the sky- where 99 red balloons go by.'

Now, as we enter 2017, once again, relations between the West and Russia have sunk to an all time low. And yet things are not the same.

NATO, which was seen as a necessity in the 1980s, is now viewed by many as a dinosaur hell-bent on plodding into Russia's backyard for no reason other than it thinks it can. Patriots, disgusted with the artificially created migrant crisis and tired of Obama's smug meddling, now view NATO in a way that was inconceivable 30 years ago.

Indeed, if Europe needs liberation, it is not from imaginary Russian armies- but from a coercive globalist superstructure that is crushing the life out of nations.

Liberal sponsored Russophobia, the McCarthyite inquisition, EU censorship, the MSM barrage of fake news, and NATO warmongering on Russia's very borders have now created a class of ordinary citizens in the West who are no longer prepared to simply escape into pop music to hide their fears. These people, now in their late 40s and 50s, came of age in the Cold War and understand that the Russian Federation is no implacable enemy.

Instead, millions ponder the EU's migrant chaos, the sense of burning national humiliation that must be endured for the sake of NATO protection, and the insecurity that is imploding societies from within and realize that they have been played: Those alienated millions who have seen their country sold from right under their feet are unlikely to fight for the globalist order that has waged all out war on their identity and smirked at their misfortune from the ivory towers of Brussels and the DC beltway.

Obama's swan song lamented the fact that 37% of Republicans, according to the Economist, respect President Putin. In Europe, the results might possibly be much higher in parties like UKIP and the FN.

If the liberal elites and their globalist neoconservative allies plunge the West into a new cold war with Russia they must understand that the 1980s have come and gone and that when the music stops — they will be the ones left without a chair.

Or let's put it another way: the British people, who would have understood why the British Army of the Rhine would have had to stand its ground at the Fulda Gap in 1985, will now no longer support NATO's reckless incursions into the Russian geo-cultural sphere. One can only assume that the millions who voted for Donald Trump feel much the same way.

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Sputnik.

promotes the use of narcotic / psychotropic substances, provides information on their production and use;

contains links to viruses and malicious software;

is part of an organized action involving large volumes of comments with identical or similar content ("flash mob");

“floods” the discussion thread with a large number of incoherent or irrelevant messages;

violates etiquette, exhibiting any form of aggressive, humiliating or abusive behavior ("trolling");

doesn’t follow standard rules of the English language, for example, is typed fully or mostly in capital letters or isn’t broken down into sentences.

The administration has the right to block a user’s access to the page or delete a user’s account without notice if the user is in violation of these rules or if behavior indicating said violation is detected.