IBDD is similar to liquid democracy, though there are differences. In IBDD, voters would still have the right to vote directly on every issue or delegate their vote to someone else, but unlike in liquid democracy, voters can choose to forego votes on one issue to use on another issue. This creates opportunity cost between issues and allows voters to specialise their votes on the issues that are more important to them.[4] This specialisation of votes allows citizens to participate effectively in issue-based direct democracy without having to focus on every issue as they would in regular direct democracy.

In the 2016 Australian federal election Flux stood two senate candidates in every state, and one in the Australian Capital Territory under the name "VOTEFLUX.ORG".[10] The group drew first preference votes of between 0.08% and 0.28% in each state, for a national average of 0.15%.[11]

The Flux Party - WA under the banner of "Flux the System!" nominated 24 candidates for the 2017 Western Australian election. 12 in the Legislative Council and another 12 in the Legislative Assembly.[12] They received first preference votes of between 0.31% and 0.88% in each legislative council region, for a state average of 0.44%,[13] a 3x increase from their 2016 election results, and just 83 votes short of winning a seat in the Mining and Pastoral region.[14]

The party controversially ran 26 so-called "fake independents" in the 2017 Western Australian election – candidates affiliated with the party who appeared as independents on the ballot papers. The party ran more self-titled independent candidates than they did candidates listed under the Flux ticket.[15]