Flop: If you consider villain capable of bluffing a lot here why not ck and let him bet?

We really don't want to build this pot here OOP unless we are ready to play for stacks and call him down.

Personally, if I bet I'd make it $0.30-$0.35 and fold to a raise without proper information.

So, the basic notion is, that Villain would bet with anything he'd call with + a lot more, so it's better to make him do the betting, right? --> we get value from a wider range of hands, and the board is pretty dry, so we could do that.

Flop: If you consider villain capable of bluffing a lot here why not ck and let him bet?

We really don't want to build this pot here OOP unless we are ready to play for stacks and call him down.

Personally, if I bet I'd make it $0.30-$0.35 and fold to a raise without proper information.

So, the basic notion is, that Villain would bet with anything he'd call with + a lot more, so it's better to make him do the betting, right? --> we get value from a wider range of hands, and the board is pretty dry, so we could do that.

Pretty much or we have to bet/fold often.

We can also take the line of bet flop, ck/call turn versus someone like him.