It has become a norm or perhaps a fashion with those in power to distort history for their own convenience. Winston Churchill’s famous quote “History is written by the victors” is for an obvious reason. Great Britain was part of the allied forces that defeated Nazi Germany following the D-Day beach landings of June 6, 1944. The objective was to remove Hitler from power and to execute the coup de grâce on the crumbling Axis power. The end of World War Two in Europe became official on May 8, 1945 with the signing of an armistice between the victor and the vanquished. This came to be known as VE (Victory in Europe) Day. Incidentally, I joined the army on the same day 23 years later in 1968.However, war in the Pacific raged on for another four months until the belligerent Japanese Imperial Army was brought to its knees after atomic bombs were dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and 9, 1945. These are facts and nobody would want to deny them as peace was the ultimate aim of the battling nations. Malaya was unwittingly drawn into the conflict as we were part of the fading British Empire in the Far East.Having said so, Napoleon Bonaparte had another theory about history. He said and I quote, “History is a set of lies that people had agreed upon”. Towards the end of Napoleon’s life, while being incarcerated on the remote island of St Helena in the Atlantic, 1870 miles from the west coast of Africa, the only weapon he had was words when he dictated his memoirs.You may wonder why I had alluded to these two luminaries as an introduction. Well, it has much to do with events unfolding on our shores presently. I take offence when some self-proclaimed clerics professed to know more about the country’s history than you and I. Someone who knows next to nothing about wars and battles could make pronouncements that are not only frivolous but ridiculous, to begin with.Ismail Mina Ahmad (pix,above), leader of Gerakan Pembela Ummah (Ummah’s Defenders Movement) during a keynote address at the movement’s convention in Kuala Lumpur on Saturday, January 13 said that those who don’t agree with the Federal Constitution to leave the country. But what really irked me was his insistence that only the Malays fought for the freedom of the country. Malays fought the Siamese, the Japanese and later the Communists Terrorists leaving the non-Malays as mere spectators. That to me is nonsense, to put it sarcastically.Such words coming from someone who cannot differentiate a pistol from a rifle is an insult to my intelligence. He should be mindful of others whose role in the country’s independence is equally important. This is not something new as we are being frequently assailed by statements which are made at the spur of the moment or upon instigation from supporters. It is playing to the gallery of which our politicians are noted for.Many non-Malays and Malays, especially those who had served time in the Malaysian Armed Forces had refuted Ismail’s claim as mischievous and without basis.“We’ve participated in defending our country and some of us have scars to show we were there risking our lives,” said Major Tan Pau Son (Retired) president of the Malaysian Armed Forces Chinese Veterans Association.Needless to say there were Chinese, Indians, Ibans, Bidayuhs and others who were killed while in harness. These non-Malays had made the ultimate sacrifices for King and Country. They did not shy away from their responsibility. And to claim that only one particular race is responsible for the country’s well-being is definitely in poor taste. And being a former serviceman with 30 years of experience battling Chin Peng and his merry men, I am certainly not amused. My good friend, Capt Chandran was posthumously awarded the Seri Pahlawan Gagah Perkasa (SP), the nation’s highest bravery award while my college mate, Capt Shamuganathan was bestowed the Pingat Gagah Berani (PGB), the next highest. These two heroes did not die in vain. - Fathol Zaman Bukhari,Ipoh Echo

Indeed the existence of JAKIM is unconstitutional. Someone should challenge this in Court. Before the Perlembagaan Penjajah was drafted, religion was (and still is) the domain of the Malay Rulers of the respective States. Religion is a State matter.When the Perjanjian Persekutuan (1948) and then the Perlembagaan Penjajah were drafted the Malay Rulers were clearly stated as being the heads of religion in their respective States. There is no such thing as a Federal Authority over religion in Malaysia.That is why Kassim Ahmad was acquitted of his charges. The Jakim clowns had him arrested in Kedah and then transported him to KL. The Court ruled that this was against the law. Because there are no federal religious laws. There is no inter-state religious authority. ALL religious laws are in State only and are only applicable inside the State. That is why the Pusat Pemulihan Akidah are also unconstitutional. You cannot arrest someone for a religious offence in Perak and send him to the Pusat Pemulihan Akidah in Negeri Sembilan. That is unconstitutional.In practise they overcome such breaches by using the Ministry of Home Affairs. For example some people who are summoned to appear before Jakim receive letters using the letterhead of the Ministry of Home Affairs. They have to do this because Jakim has no authority. They have no power. That is why they use the Ministry of Home Affairs letterheads. But this is questionable and most likely against the Perlembagaan Penjajah. Someone must challenge this in the Courts. Same with Jakim's halal stickers. Jakim earns millions of Ringgit from the halal stickers. Jakim has no power or authority to take any action to impose the halal stickers. It is unconstitutional for Jakim to even issue the halal stickers in the first place. Who gave them the authority to issue halal stickers and collect money from the people? Again this should also be challenged in the Courts. If Jakim issues halal stickers, each and every state can also issue their own halal stickers. Why give the monopoly to Jakim. There is no law that can prevent a State from also issuing its own halal stickers.Also since the Sultan of Johor has banned Jakim from Johor this means that Jakim's halal stickers are unlawful in the State of Johor. Johor must start issuing its own halal stickers.Tengku Razaleigh is correct when he says that Jakim is unconstitutional. The easiest option is to just shut down Jakim. - ostb

disclaimer

1. This is a personal weblog. The opinions expressed here represent my own and is not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, institution, political organization, or individual.

2. Any view or opinion represented in the blog comments are personal and is accredited to the respective commentor / visitor to this blog.

3. This blogger reserves the right to moderate comment suitability in support of respecting racial, religious and political sensitivities, and in order to protect the rights of each commentor where available.