A Paradox Concerning Shrinkage Estimators: Should a Known Scale Parameter Be Replaced by an Estimated Value in the Shrinkage Factor?

Author

Abstract

When estimating, under quadratic loss, the location parameter[theta]of a spherically symmetric distribution with known scale parameter, we show that it may be that the common practice of utilizing the residual vector as an estimate of the variance is preferable to using the known value of the variance. In the context of Stein-like shrinkage estimators, we exhibit sufficient conditions on the spherical distributions for which this paradox occurs. In particular, we show that it occurs fort-distributions when the dimension of the residual vector is sufficiently large. The main tools in the development are upper and lower bounds on the risks of the James-Stein estimators which are exact at[theta]=0.

More about this item

Keywords

Statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:59:y:1996:i:2:p:109-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.