Enjoyed this debate? Please share it!

You need to be logged in to be able to comment

Bi0HazardThe argument PRO gave would be good in a 100-200 character quick debate, but not in this long one.

Posted 2016-10-07 03:59:25

Bi0HazardIf you assume equality regardless of race or genders as the default position , then yes, CON would have the burden of proof.
I thought about this in, "That women should be allowed into front-line combat roles". I thought it should be, "That women should not be allowed into front-line combat roles" instead.

Posted 2016-10-07 03:58:27

KelniusI can't accept this challenge, because by the nature of this statement, the "con" side actually holds the sole and affirmative burden of proof. This claim implies "same sex couples should have less rights than heterosexual couples", and so your side is actually the affirmative and you require warrant for your position - you hold the burden of proof.
My position is the neutral one, and I would need you to prove your case before I could disprove it.