Airline service quality: Lufthansa well aligned across the group

Once upon a time the name Lufthansa referred to an airline. While that is still largely true, the Lufthansa Group now encompasses a collection of airlines in which the German parent has complete or partial ownership. Long known for its precision and attention to detail, how do its daughter companies compare when rated by passengers?

This is the fourth in a series examining customer service as revealed by passenger reviews on Skytrax. For full methodology and explanations please click on Airline service quality.

Lufthansa’s holdings include its regional partners CityLine (100%), Air Dolomiti (100%) and Eurowings (49.8%). Despite their “separate” status, they operate segments of Lufthansa’s network and are perceived by passengers as being Lufthansa.

This report will focus on Lufthansa and its four major European partners, Swiss, Austrian, BMI and Brussels. Germanwings could not be included as there were too few reviews to make the comparisons equal.

Among the five, three are given four stars by Skytrax, LH, LX, OS, with BMI and SN rating a three star ranking.

The parent company is generally well-regarded by its customers. On its longhaul services, the present weak link is the 747 fleet, which takes knocks because of its age and lack of modern IFE in the main cabin. The aircraft were seen to be well maintained but dated in terms of many features that have been incorporated into the newer aircraft.

One recurring criticism was the size of the Business Class sections relative to staff available. Especially on the A380, the ratio of staff to passengers was seen as low.

On European routes, Business Class was assessed as being of marginal value due to the seat pitch that was the same throughout the aircraft, but with the center seat left empty in C. This was a recurrent theme for all the airlines; that the extravagant amenities that separate Business from economy over long sectors are very much diminished on single-aisle airplanes.

This is an ongoing conundrum for European carriers who have found that dedicated cabins don’t work but that a modified economy is not deemed to present an acceptable value proposition.

There were also quite a few comments related to Frankfurt airport and its complex layout and penchant for delays. Munich fared somewhat better. There were also far more references to lounges than we have seen in other assessments, meaning that the lounge experience is a larger part of the total journey when shorter distances are flown.

Despite the comments on FRA, 60% of the reviewers said that there was value in the purchase—a number equal to that for the Gulf carriers who are trying to capture passengers currently using European hubs.

Swiss International

Swiss 4*

Points

Nat

Class

Food

Svc

Grnd

Cft

Val

9

AT

C

G

G

G

G

X

8

UK

C

G

G

B

G

X

8

UK

Y

G

G

G

X

6

UK

C

G

G

B

G

X

8

UK

C

G

G

M

G

X

9

NL

Y

G

G

G

X

0

CH

Y

B

8

UK

C

G

G

B

G

X

0

UK

Y

B

8

CH

C

G

G

G

X

9

DE

Y

G

G

G

G

X

8

UK

Y

G

G

G

G

X

7

AU

C

G

G

G

G

X

9

UK

C

G

G

G

G

X

0

UK

Y

B

B

B

B

8

CH

Y

G

G

G

X

9

CH

Y

G

G

B

G

X

2

BE

Y

B

B

B

B

5

CH

Y

G

M

X

7

UK

Y

G

G

G

X

4

DE

C

X

8

FR

C

G

G

G

G

X

4

UK

C

M

G

B

G

7

NL

C

M

G

M

G

X

4

FR

C

B

B

6.2

19

Passengers flying on LX, successor to Lufthansa’s former rival, Swissair, report astonishingly similar experiences and the average ranking scores are almost identical to those of Lufthansa. A slightly higher number of posters felt that they got value for their travel money--perhaps because the Swiss hub airport is smaller and less congested, and the Swiss fleet is more homogeneous.

The original angled Business Class seats got somewhat negative reviews but the newer version, introduced with the A333 and being retrofitted on the A340s, is seen as a necessary and appreciated improvement. The makeshift shorthaul Business arrangement, similar to LH, also got mixed reviews.

Since the two airlines serve many of the same destinations and are used by passengers in combination, the alignment of service quality probably means that passengers feel equally well served on either, that the products are interchangeable.

Since its post-war inception, Austrian has had a more tumultuous history than either of the other two Germanic flag carriers. It has been in and out of various markets, has had a wide variety of aircraft types and partners, and at present, still shows the signs of its pre-Lufthansa days in its fleet, which contains aircraft originally part of the Lauda heritage.

Despite this it remarkably also garners reviews similar to its neighboring airlines, while convincing a full 80% of its reviewers that they got good value in their selection. However, there was one unique factor at work with the OS reviews in that a single reviewer accounted for 10 of the postings in the group that was reviewed.

The passenger, who is Swiss, is clearly a frequent traveller and many of his assessments had some common language. However, he did not give the same numerical ranking each time, nor did he uniformly believe that the journey provided value.

The following is from one post; “After observing this route now for 1-2 months I have to say that standards differ pretty much. Sometimes you get a glass of drinks, sometimes you get a full can. Sometimes you get a nice salad, sometimes it is only a small sandwich. The crew can be very friendly, charming and smiling - or very disinterested.”

This adds credibility to our initial assumption that on any given day, people have different experiences and expectations, and that crew composition, aircraft type and time of day can result in quite different levels of satisfaction.

BMI British Midland

BMI 3*

Points

Nat

Class

Food

Svc

Grnd

Cft

Val

4

UK

Y

B

B

B

G

X

2

UK

Y

B

B

0

UK

Y

B

5

UK

Y

B

B

B

G

4

UK

Y

G

B

1

UK

Y

B

B

B

3

FR

Y

G

G

X

0

SG

Y

B

8

AU

Y

G

G

G

X

10

UK

Y

G

M

X

10

UK

Y

G

G

X

8

SG

Y

G

M

G

X

5

UK

Y

B

G

B

8

UK

Y

G

G

X

9

AU

Y

G

G

G

X

9

UK

Y

G

G

G

X

8

UK

Y

G

G

X

2

UK

C

G

B

5

UK

C

G

G

B

X

8

UK

C

G

G

M

X

8

UK

Y+

G

G

G

X

1

UK

Y

B

8

UK

C

G

G

G

G

X

7

UK

Y

G

X

7

UK

C

G

G

G

M

X

5.6

16

British Midland differs considerably from the previous three carriers. Its network is somewhat eclectic and includes a great many domestic UK and European flights. Its primary value lies in the number of slots held at Heathrow.

The airline operates a few longer routes with A330s and B757s that have a dedicated Business Class, but the majority of flights operate in a single cabin configuration, with, in some cases, the middle seat kept free.

Reviewers, most of whom flew short legs, tended to focus on ground services and facilities more than was the case with the previous three - as the travel time may include more ground time than air time.

More often than not, a high number indicated that the flight went smoothly and that the traveler’s expectations were met. A flight from London to Newcastle obviously provides minimal opportunities for grand features.

The cumulative assessment was of a carrier with generally predictable and acceptable service and amenities.

Brussels Airlines

Brussels Airlines 3*

Points

Nat

Class

Food

Svc

Grnd

Cft

Val

2

RW

C

M

M

B

8

NL

Y

G

X

5

UK

Y

G

G

B

M

9

MC

Y

G

G

G

G

X

7

UK

Y

G

5

BE

Y

G

0

UK

Y

B

8

FR

C

G

G

M

X

8

BE

Y+

M

M

9

UK

Y+

G

G

G

8

DK

Y

G

G

G

X

10

BE

Y

G

G

X

7

ES

Y

G

G

G

X

8

BE

Y

G

G

B

X

4

BE

Y

M

B

8

PT

Y

G

G

G

X

2

IT

Y

M

B

2

BE

Y

B

B

9

CH

Y+

G

G

G

X

0

SE

Y

B

0

FR

Y

B

3

FR

Y

B

7

BE

Y

X

8

IL

Y

G

G

G

G

X

8

DK

C

G

M

X

5.8

12

Sabena’s successor has chosen to operate a far smaller network than the former Belgian flag carrier; focused on Europe and Africa. Itineraries that include North America or Asia are routed over partner networks.

Prior to its part acquisition by LH, the airline had joined forces with Virgin Express, a low-cost competitor. The result, in Europe, has been a hybrid product that, according to reviewers, sometimes straddles the border between full-service and low-cost.

Differentiation on board is often by fare paid, with higher fares including more features. Those who had paid for the additional services were often critical of the choice, having seen little or no value rendered for the additional cost. Hence, SN has the smallest number of reviewers who realised a value proposition.

Additionally, many of its Africa routes are thinly served, making it possible for SN to charge higher fares than may be seen on other routes of similar distance. So again, there was some complaining about cost.

Like many of its European peers, the airline depends heavily on a fleet of Avro/BAe aircraft. The “longevity” of these aircraft has not escaped notice.

This set of reviews was the first in which posters acknowledged that some flights were made on codeshare carriers' equipment. In only one case was that seen as a negative development.

Lufthansa’s product lines are well aligned.

Whether by accident or design, Skytrax suggests the companies within the Lufthansa group align well within their service parameters. The three that share a common German heritage and geographic association are well suited to be used interchangeably and provide the customer with a similar service experience.

The other two bring benefits specific to their region, Heathrow for one and the EU capital for the other, and provide acceptable, if not stellar service. They all additionally, are members of Star alliance, adding significantly to that group’s European coverage.

Thus far, the Lufthansa Group is the only one that encompasses so many brands. The proposed expansion of the BA/Iberia paring may, eventually, provide another incarnation of the practice.

Next: the growing and turbulent market in South America where LAN in its many national forms is looking to merge with TAM, the flag carrier of the continent’s largest player, Brazil.

Want more analysis like this? CAPA Membership gives you access to all news and analysis on the site, along with access to many areas of our comprehensive databases and toolsets.Find out more and take a free trial.

You may also be interested in the following articles...

Lufthansa's supervisory board has approved the exercise of its call option to buy the remaining 55% of SN Airholding, the parent company of Brussels Airlines. Lufthansa acquired 45% of the company in 2009 and negotiated the option to buy the balance of the shares for no more than EUR250 million. The deal is expected to close in early 2017, once the details of the purchase have been agreed with the other SN Airholding shareholders.

Lufthansa and Brussels Airlines have an extensive codeshare agreement and are partners in the Star Alliance. Their existing relationship is such that Brussels Airlines already feels like a member of the Lufthansa Group. The main draw for Lufthansa has always been its Belgian partner's extensive African network (it is the number two airline on Western Europe-Central/Western Africa).

However, it now seems that Lufthansa will, at least partly, integrate Brussels Airlines into its Eurowings low cost brand. Lufthansa is keen to accelerate Eurowings' expansion through partners (and is also to wet-lease up to 35 aircraft from airberlin). Brussels Airlines' fleet and single-class configuration on short/medium haul should fit with Eurowings, but its unit cost and network airline business model are not characteristic of an LCC.

From 2009 to 2015 SWISS accounted for 47% of the operating profits produced by all the airlines in the Lufthansa Passenger Airline Group, and 29% for the Lufthansa Group overall. It has also consistently been the Group's most profitable airline in margin terms. In 2015 it even managed to post a higher margin than Lufthansa's MRO business – traditionally a much more robust and profitable activity than most airlines.

Nevertheless, SWISS seems now to be struggling to maintain these achievements. Its passenger load factor, while still the highest in the group, is on the decline. Revenue is falling and SWISS suffered a drop in margin in 1Q2016. The seasonally weak 1Q may not say too much about prospects for the full year, but Lufthansa expects SWISS to report a slightly lower adjusted EBIT in 2016 relative to 2015.

With four new Boeing 777-300ER aircraft now in SWISS' long haul fleet and the first Bombardier C Series due to join its short haul fleet imminently, SWISS is not standing still.