Added both. (sent a message confirming this earlier already, but not
sure whether it got through, had some mail problem)
Jos de Bruijn wrote:
> All,
>
> I propose to add the following two editor's notes to the rdf:text
> document so that the document can be published before resolving the
> issues I raised in my review of the document [1].
>
> To section 3, below the specification of the lexical space, add an
> editor's note with the following text:
>
> The definition of the set of characters, particularly the fact that it
> is infinite, as well as the compatibility with xml string -- whether the
> string part of the lex & val space should be the same as xs:string --
> are under discussion.
>
> To section 4.3.1 add an editor's note with the following text:
>
> The inclusion of text-length, as well as the definition of the function
> -- what should be the length of an rdf:text value -- are under discussion.
>
>
> Best, Jos
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-text/2008OctDec/0006.html
--
Dr. Axel Polleres
Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland,
Galway
email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/