Your brain is programmed by product of modern marxist thought, and it is as unrealistic as it was back then. It is quite possible that you are not aware, in the same way fish is not aware of water. But one of it's symptoms is attempt at bending the narrative of left vs right politics so that it fits the paradigm in your head.

Since I don't share the same programming (maybe because I was exposed to it ad naseaum at young age, so my organism eventually rejected it) I can see the bend.

Muso's got a point. Obama's only significant responses to this tragedy seem to be focused on reducing access to assault rifles, and no assault rifle was even used. In other words, Democrats are just using the opportunity to pursue their existing legislative agenda, paying no attention whatsoever to the actual problem. They've barely paid lip service to the general issue of violence in culture, and have practically fenced off violence in entertainment as sacred ground (don't want to piss off Hollywood or the TV channels, who have been nicely serving as Outer Party members to the Ministry of Truth).

If the authoritarian leftists had any balls, they insist that civilians only be allowed to use bolt-action, manually-fed, single-round firearms. But they don't have any balls (the people with guns would NEVER tolerate this, even if the majority of the population supported it), therefore, this is all nothing but political theater and populist grand-standing, and it won't make any difference at all to anything. We've had these same bans before, and they didn't make any difference then either.

this isn't the only time that assault rifles weren't used to kill people.

so, let me get this straight. you are faulting him for focusing on assault rifles, even though they do kill a lot of people, and admit that hand guns will only be taken "from their cold dead hands".

this isn't the only time that assault rifles weren't used to kill people.

so, let me get this straight. you are faulting him for focusing on assault rifles, even though they do kill a lot of people, and admit that hand guns will only be taken "from their cold dead hands".

weird.

Actually, assault rifles don't kill a lot of people except when in the hands of soldiers. But what is being advocated is that only soldiers, the ones who are the least responsible with them from a kill rate / % usership perspective, be the ones who have them... And you agree.

weird._________________Freedom is the oxygen of the soul. -Moshe Dayan

Here in my country we have such a rigid politics over gun ownership, it is quite difficult you find a gun with a regular citizen in Brazil. Is that a good thing? Maybe. But what really concerns me is that the outlaws do not respect too much the restrictions, the ruffians still armed to their teeth and the guys that have the control of illegal commercialization of guns get richer every single day._________________'I' means I, 'we' means we.

Wow. I'd say the peanut butter jar wins the prize. What the fuck is wrong with some people? :lol:

Quote:

We saved the weirdest story for last. During a kinky sex session, two homosexual men decided to try something new. One man lay down and let the other man pour liquid cement into his anus using a funnel. Yes, really.

Naturally, the cement didn't stay liquid for long, and when it hardened it became a huge mass of cement that had to be surgically removed.

Still, just because they do it doesn't mean a phobe has to try it (they're really just afraid they'll like it!)._________________lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.