Can't find one murder, manslaughter etcetera conviction of a Scientology member or church official. You claimed you did but you didn't. You're just
outright lying IMO.

You obviously didn't look hard enough. It's well documented.

HAHAH! Are you one of those people who barrages people with multiple lengthy
links that you don't fully read? That sends people on a time consuming wild goose chase. It's a dirty trick.

It's called presenting evidence. If that evidence is 100 pages, so be it. It doesn't take away from the fact that Scientology members have been
convicted and that Scientology has been convicted (as a group) for fraud.

Can't find one murder, manslaughter etcetera conviction of a Scientology member or church official. You claimed you did but you didn't. You're just
outright lying IMO.

Don't fall for Terry's trick, SpecialSauce. He's one of those people. He'll have you reading things he hasn't read, for
hours.

Typical scientologist. Someone provides evidence against your cult and you close your eyes.

Typical troll. You read titles of lengthy articles
and then assume that it has material that will back up your claims, so you don't read it. You're too lazy to read it. So you post links to it and then
have genuinely curious people wasting their time reading it. When they report back that it doesn't pertain to your claim, you tell them to look
harder. You weasel you.

Can't find one murder, manslaughter etcetera conviction of a Scientology member or church official. You claimed you did but you didn't. You're just
outright lying IMO.

Don't fall for Terry's trick, SpecialSauce. He's one of those people. He'll have you reading things he hasn't read, for
hours.

Typical scientologist. Someone provides evidence against your cult and you close your eyes.

Typical troll. You read titles of lengthy articles
and then assume that it has material that will back up your claims, so you don't read it. You're too lazy to read it. So you post links to it and then
have genuinely curious people wasting their time reading it. When they report back that it doesn't pertain to your claim, you tell them to look
harder. You weasel you.

Apart from the fact that the link I provided shows the convictions and have links to said conviction.

Also, the only 2 people who are saying that they're wrong are the 2 scientologists.

I know of the disciplinary action he faced for opening fire on a non existent sub off the coast of Mexico, but other than that his records don't even
show he was in any combat theater.

The four medals that the US Navy's record credits to Hubbard were the American Defense Service Medal, which was awarded to all members of the military
in service at the time of the December 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor; the American Campaign Medal, awarded to all service members who had performed duty
in the American Theater of Operations during the war; the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, awarded to all who had served in the Pacific Theater; and
the World War II Victory Medal, awarded to all who served during World War II.[8

I know of the disciplinary action he faced for opening fire on a non existent sub off the coast of Mexico, but other than that his records don't even
show he was in any combat theater.

The four medals that the US Navy's record credits to Hubbard were the American Defense Service Medal, which was awarded to all members of the military
in service at the time of the December 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor; the American Campaign Medal, awarded to all service members who had performed duty
in the American Theater of Operations during the war; the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, awarded to all who had served in the Pacific Theater; and
the World War II Victory Medal, awarded to all who served during World War II.[8

Can't find one murder, manslaughter etcetera conviction of a Scientology member or church official. You claimed you did but you didn't. You're just
outright lying IMO.

Don't fall for Terry's trick, SpecialSauce. He's one of those people. He'll have you reading things he hasn't read, for
hours.

Typical scientologist. Someone provides evidence against your cult and you close your eyes.

Typical troll. You read titles of lengthy articles
and then assume that it has material that will back up your claims, so you don't read it. You're too lazy to read it. So you post links to it and then
have genuinely curious people wasting their time reading it. When they report back that it doesn't pertain to your claim, you tell them to look
harder. You weasel you.

Apart from the fact that the link I provided shows the convictions and have links to said conviction.

Also, the only 2 people who are saying that they're wrong are the 2 scientologists.

How do you know we're Scientologists? Special Sauce has
stated explicitly that he isn't. Can you even define the word "Scientologist?" If I were Trump id call you "TrecherousTerryDon.."Ha! That's a good
one.

Can't find one murder, manslaughter etcetera conviction of a Scientology member or church official. You claimed you did but you didn't. You're just
outright lying IMO.

Don't fall for Terry's trick, SpecialSauce. He's one of those people. He'll have you reading things he hasn't read, for
hours.

Typical scientologist. Someone provides evidence against your cult and you close your eyes.

Typical troll. You read titles of lengthy articles
and then assume that it has material that will back up your claims, so you don't read it. You're too lazy to read it. So you post links to it and then
have genuinely curious people wasting their time reading it. When they report back that it doesn't pertain to your claim, you tell them to look
harder. You weasel you.

Apart from the fact that the link I provided shows the convictions and have links to said conviction.

Also, the only 2 people who are saying that they're wrong are the 2 scientologists.

How do you know we're Scientologists? Special Sauce has
stated explicitly that he isn't. Can you even define the word "Scientologist?" If I were Trump id call you "TrecherousTerryDon. Ha! That's a good one.

It's obvious that you're both scientologists. Why else would you stick up for them and deny evidence presented? You also use all the typical
Scientology arguments.

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and sounds like a duck......it must be a scientologist.

I know of the disciplinary action he faced for opening fire on a non existent sub off the coast of Mexico, but other than that his records don't even
show he was in any combat theater.

The four medals that the US Navy's record credits to Hubbard were the American Defense Service Medal, which was awarded to all members of the military
in service at the time of the December 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor; the American Campaign Medal, awarded to all service members who had performed duty
in the American Theater of Operations during the war; the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, awarded to all who had served in the Pacific Theater; and
the World War II Victory Medal, awarded to all who served during World War II.[8

From Wikipedia

You do know that that doesn't mean he fought, just that he was there?

You know. Smoking his pipe merrily while they boys played with bullets. Typical WW2 scenario.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.