Costa Mesa can continue to enforce its regulations for sober living homes, after a Friday, Dec. 7 court decision found they are legal and don’t discriminate against people in recovery.

The city was sued in 2014 by Yellowstone Women’s First Step House and the Sober Living Network, a group that represents 11 operators of facilities for people recovering from alcohol and drug abuse, over rules that govern where and how the homes can operate.

Recovering addicts are protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the U.S. Supreme Court has held that cities can’t use zoning to exclude or discriminate against disabled groups.

The plaintiffs suing Costa Mesa argued that city police, code enforcement and other officials had targeted their facilities for harassment to drive them from residential neighborhoods, and that the city’s rules placed unfair restrictions on sober living homes.

A federal jury on Friday decided in Costa Mesa’s favor, which means “This ordinance is absolutely fine,” said Jennifer Keller, an attorney who represented the city.

“The city can go ahead and enforce this or a similar ordinance,” she said. “The jurors did not buy that this was a violation of anybody’s civil rights, that it was a violation of fair housing or that it was discriminatory in any way.”

Officials with the Sober Living Network and their attorney could not be reached Friday afternoon for comment.

Attorney Isaac Zfaty, who represented Yellowstone, said he’s disappointed but not surprised by the ruling and plans to appeal it.

Costa Mesa didn’t show evidence connecting sober living homes to increased crime or other social ills that the city said necessitated its rules, Zfaty said, and the rules were specifically directed at people in recovery.

“Our view of it is that this is a civil rights fight like any other,” he said. “Obviously we will continue to seek justice for our clients.”

The rules challenged by the lawsuit included a 650-foot buffer between sober living homes, a special permit requirement and background checks for house managers at sober homes.

The city has said it fielded numerous complaints from residents that some sober homes created noise and trash and sent secondhand smoke into the neighborhood.

Because of the ruling, Yellowstone will have to reduce its occupancy from 15 people to six people, Keller said.

Officials in other Orange County cities struggling to regulate drug and alcohol recovery homes may eye the Costa Mesa decision with interest. Among them is Dana Point Councilwoman Debra Lewis, who said her council colleagues have shied away from passing regulations for fear the city would be sued.

“I’ve always thought Costa Mesa’s ordinance strikes that right balance” between protecting people who live in recovery homes and others in the neighborhood, Lewis said, adding that in light of the ruling she may bring the issue back.

Costa Mesa Mayor Katrina Foley said the verdict is a victory for the city after it stood up to legal threats from the sober living industry.

The case cost the city about $2 million, she said, but “sometimes you can’t put a price tag on what’s the value of preserving the quality of the community.”

Alicia Robinson covers Anaheim for The Orange County Register. She previously spent 10 years at The Press-Enterprise writing about Riverside and local government as well as Norco, Corona, homeless issues, Alzheimer's disease, streetcars, butterflies, horses and chickens. She grew up in the Midwest but earned Southern California native status during many hours spent in traffic. Two big questions Alicia tries to answer in stories about government are: how is it supposed to work, and how is it working?