Several Durham police officers lied about non-existent 911 calls to try to convince residents to allow them to search their homes, a tactic several lawyers say is illegal. The officers targeted residences where individuals with outstanding warrants were thought to be living, and told them that dispatch had received a 911 call from that address, when no such call had been made.

However, Durham Police Chief Jose Lopez says the 911 tactic was never a part of official policy. Last month, the department officially banned the practice, according to a memo from Lopez.

The tactic came to light at a court hearing on May 27, when a Durham Police officer testified it was part of official departmental policy. The hearing involved a defendant who had been charged with marijuana possession. (The INDY is not naming the defendant because the charges against her were dropped.)

In February, Officer A.B. Beck knocked on the door of the defendant’s home in South-Central Durham. When the defendant answered the door, Beck told her—falsely—that someone in her home had called 911 and hung up, and that he wanted to make sure everyone was safe. The defendant permitted Beck to enter her home, where he discovered two marijuana blunts and a marijuana grinder.

When Beck took the witness stand, he admitted to fabricating the 911 story in order to enter the house. Beck testified that his true intent was to serve a warrant, though he never produced the warrant in the courtroom.

Beck further testified that the 911 ruse was permitted under a department policy in cases where domestic violence is alleged, recalled Morgan Canady, the defendant’s lawyer.

During cross-examination, Canady quizzed Beck further.

Did you say there was a 911 hang-up? she asked.

Yes, he said.

But there was not a 911 hang-up?

No.

So you entered the house based on a lie?

Yes.

And this is your policy for domestic violence warrants?

Yes.

At that point Canady made a motion to suppress the marijuana evidence. Since the defendant’s consent was based on false premises, Canady reasoned, the consent was not informed and voluntary. Marcia Morey, chief district judge for Durham County, allowed the motion to suppress the evidence.

“You cannot enter someone’s house based on a lie,” Morey said from the bench during the hearing.

Without the evidence, the district attorney’s office dropped the charges.

The policy supported him in cases where domestic violence is involved. Or so he said. Perhaps it did. This case had nothing to do with domestic violence, and so his justification was a misdirect to the court.

WTF is going on with the police? Have they always been this crooked and it has taken alternative media (thank you Capt) to point it out, or are they getting this much worse? Are they a symptom of a crumbling moral compass, or an anomaly? I have shared the “don’t talk to police” video with dozens of people and could tell you some stories that would make your hair curl (I work as a firefighter). This is getting ridiculous!

Miles

It builds, layer upon layer, getting worse as we go along.

Yes, I believe the popo have always done such stupid stuff (look at the Miranda warning from the 60s and other SCOTUS rulings about searches etc.)

Instapundit linked to this same article and opined: “If they have contempt for the law, why shouldn’t we? And why shouldn’t we have contempt for them?”
“Law Enforcement” in the U.S. has sown to the wind and is getting ready to reap the whirlwind and they have no one to blame but themselves.

B.Rubin

You’re probably right…especially about the layering…I didn’t look at it that way. Light is the best disinfectant and there is finally light being shined on it.