Racial Dominance

Human races can be arranged in a dominance hierarchy. Some races are more dominant than others. In our natural habitat, we were the dominant race on earth. Today, Jews occupy that position. They subjugated whites as quickly and easily as whites subjugated blacks, Amerindians, and East Asians. (Yes, despite East Asians’ higher intelligence as measured by IQ tests, we are the dominant race.)

Since Jews are dominant over whites, who in turn (prior to subjugation) were dominant over all other races, Jews are ipso facto dominant over all races on earth, just as their teachings, psychology, and deeply-held convictions tell them they are. There are no exceptions to this rule. Following this line of reasoning, other races possess no better defenses against Jewish depredations than we do.

This is well-illustrated by a 1953 letter written by an exasperated Francis Parker Yockey from Egypt, where he had hoped to enlist a few allies against the Jews:

These people are terribly stupid and incorrigible (not capable of being enlightened) . . . They’re simply too roasted by the sun to be able to accomplish anything. . . .

[A] few days ago an important fellahin journalist said to me, about the Jews, “I regard the Jews as cousins.” And the country is now at war with the Jews. But the officials say: not against the Jews, against the ZIONISTS. . . . Even the Gods contend in vain against stupidity. The synagogues here are very large, and they’re all on the rise. The big businesses are Jewish. On the streets the Jews can’t be distinguished from the others—except in a few cases—these people come from Europe—and they say “I’m a European.” And they [the Egyptians] believe it, too.

There are two ways to look at this. One is the one-dimensional “racist” way: “Those stupid Arabs (or Muslims)!” The other is from a dominance perspective. Arabs, despite being (supposedly) genetically similar Semites, cannot match Jews in dominance. Jewry’s success depends heavily on the blindness and submissiveness of its victims.

US Senators, Representatives, and President Obama’s cabinet flattered Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu with 29 standing ovations during this 50-minute speech in 2011—rising and applauding in unison an average of more than once every two minutes. Netanyahu’s milestone second address (his first was in 1996) placed him in the select company of South African Communist Nelson Mandela and Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, a former member of the terrorist Haganah, who also addressed two joint sessions of Congress. Record holder Winston Churchill addressed three.

The idea of racial dominance was advanced by WASP physical anthropologist Carleton Coon, professor at Harvard University and the University of Pennsylvania, in his book The Origin of Races (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1962). Other works by Coon include The Races of Europe (1939) and The Living Races of Man (1965).

In Origin, under the subhead “The Dominance of Groups,” he wrote:

Dominance has two meanings in zoology: the dominance of individuals in social groups, as shown by the peck order and the like, and the dominance of one kind of animal over another. We are concerned here with the second meaning only.

Groups of dominant animals may range in diversity from whole orders to families to genera and even to species. . . . Even within a species such as ours [Homo sapiens], certain subspecies and races may show dominance over others. [Emphasis added.] This is part of the evolutionary process. . . .

This is why rabbits and foxes, when let loose in Australia, raised such havoc with the local fauna [animals], and why, in another sense but following the same principle, the white settlers have replaced the aborigines in the wetter sections of the same continent. (pp. 48-50)

I witnessed a vivid demonstration of this principle when I was a boy. My dog was dominant in the sense described by Coon. Every time he interacted with strange dogs, regardless of breed, he would assume a menacing air and the other dogs would immediately submit, lowering themselves and making a whimpering sound. I never observed an instance where this did not occur.

A similar dominance-docility relation exists between Jews and whites. Whites are submissive—embarrassingly so. There is also a strange—frankly, disgusting—sado-masochistic component, with Jews the hate-filled sadists and whites the adoring masochists.

Dominance should be distinguished from Darwinian fitness, with which it is often confused. Strictly speaking, when applied to race (which it usually isn’t, because contemporary evolutionary analysis avoids acknowledging racial differences), fitness means differential reproductive success (more offspring). Therefore, as one college textbook put it, “Such statements as ‘the unfit are outreproducing the fit’ are meaningless. By definition, the unfit cannot outreproduce the fit.” One of the most fit human populations today is blacks.

Dominance is also distinct from superiority. Though Jews are dominant over whites, we are superior. As William Pierce noted, our race does an overall better job excelling in every field of endeavor: literature, engineering, painting and sculpture, astronomy, building cities and roads, and exploring new lands.

Though Jewish dominance is visible in face-to-face exchanges, it is especially noticeable in the social, cultural, ideological, and institutional realms. In any assemblage or organization, Jews, given sufficient numbers and time—they can work ceaselessly for specific objectives over much longer time periods (generations, even) than whites—will get their collective way on matters of importance to them. This is true in entire societies as well.

We might say that population dominance is achieved through control of culture. A dominant race creates and shapes the social, psychological, and behavioral environment to which subject races must adapt. The dominant group creates an environment, a culture, advantageous to its members but exploitative of and maladaptive to subordinate races. Jews have gone so far as to strive for the extinction of whites, despite formulating the laws that made genocide an international crime against humanity. They routinely ignore and violate law whenever it suits their purpose.

To fully comprehend the radical and disastrous effect of Jewish dominance, consider an historical analogy that will be easier for most readers to grasp. Contrast the populations and social systems of Amerindians—the large, populous civilizations of the Aztecs and Incas as well as the sparsely-populated hunter-gatherer tribes of North America—prior to and following the arrival of the white man.

In 1532, Spanish conquistador Francisco Pizarro, with just 168 men (106 foot soldiers and 62 horsemen), far from from any Spanish outposts in the Caribbean that could have reinforced him with men, arms, or provisions, conquered the Inca Empire whose ruler commanded 80,000 warriors. The Incas governed most of what is now Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia and part of Chile. After the defeat, the Incas lost their will to resist, and a handful of Europeans ended up conquering millions of Amerindians. This was a clear display of racial dominance unrelated to superior technology or the inadvertent spread of disease.

This pattern was repeated everywhere Europeans went, not so dramatically, but very rapidly: in the rest of Latin America, North America, Africa, Asia (including China and India), and Siberia. Whites quickly established their dominance over natives everywhere.

Like the plants on the right, which are genetically identical to those on the left, whites cannot thrive in an alien cultural environment controlled by Jews.

It is extremely important to be aware of this phenomenon. For Jews are as dominant over us in their way as we were over non-whites in ours. And so far we have coped with them no better than Africans, Asians, or Amerindians coped with us. Of course, consistent with the transitive law of inequality stated in the second paragraph of this essay, Jews replaced whites decades ago as the race dominating all non-whites on earth.

What accounts for the wholesale subjugation of whites by Jews beginning in the 19th century and culminating in the 20th?

Demographics is one factor. Despite innate dominance, no race can vanquish a much larger race unless it has sufficient numbers to do so. These were apparently lacking prior to the 18th and 19th centuries, when Jews experienced a massive population explosion. Though Jews always constituted a uniquely wealthy, privileged, and powerful caste in Europe, their numbers were insufficient to completely dominate and distort the entire culture.

The population explosion coincided with an internal population shift—and replacement. Though the Iberian Sephardim outnumbered Ashkenazim in the early modern era, after the expulsions from Spain and Portugal their numbers collapsed, while those of the Ashkenazim expanded. Today Ashkenazi Jews constitute roughly 90 percent of world Jewry, while the Iberian Sephardim, once so mighty and numerous, no longer exist, socially or genetically speaking. (The minority designated “Sephardim” today are a different subpopulation—Oriental Jews who observe Sephardic religious rites.)

It seems possible that the Ashkenazim represent a particularly virulent strain . . . which is saying a lot. They are driven by a burning hatred no Gentile can fully comprehend. (Strangely, most Gentiles remain completely oblivious to it even when it strikes them in the face.)

Jewish dominance is also technological. Jews exercise a tight monopoly over intellectual discourse, association, electoral politics, and “public opinion” through their century-long control of the mass media of broadcasting, motion pictures, popular music, video games, publishing, and the Internet.

Once one race successfully asserts its dominance over another, it distorts the normal cultural and biological processes of the lower group. A socialization process alters the latter’s leadership cadre. Natural leaders are deemed inimical to the interests of the ruling class and are eliminated—even murdered at times, as Pizarro murdered the Inca emperor Atahualpa or the Communists massacred the Polish Officer Corps in 1940—while the fortunes of ambitious, sufficiently talented and energetic individuals willing to work against the vital interests of their own people are advanced.

As a result, Gentiles worldwide have fallen victim to the exteriorization of the closed, narrow-minded, bigoted, bitter, hateful, violent, criminal, dogmatic, intolerant, superstitious, filthy mentality of the shtetl, ghetto, and synagogue.

One far-reaching difference between Jewish rule and white rule, despite the careless use of the word “genocide,” is that whites never intended to physically exterminate native peoples. If that had been their goal, the subject races would no longer exist. (Some demographically small subpopulations did disappear.)

Instead, non-white races grew quickly, at least until recently, when modern techniques of population reduction were imposed on a global scale through so-called “birth control” and “family planning” measures. But this was done under Jewish auspices, not white, because we were no longer in command of our own destiny, never mind anybody else’s.

Yet Jews, drunk on the self-generated fury of their socially-constructed Holocaust religion, do have the intention of committing genocide.

Any meaningful effort to stop them must take racial dominance into account and devise methods to successfully thwart and overcome it. This means identifying pressure points and unique vulnerabilities, as well as strengths, in both races and targeting or compensating for them respectively. It is a practical problem requiring imaginative solutions.

One precept entailed by dominance analysis is that it is vital to correctly identify and confront the Main Enemy in order to solve our racial problems (independence and survival). Conceptually speaking, that is no small contribution. Blacks, Mestizos, Arabs, and Asians are all secondary. As William Pierce stated, we are heading for extinction because Jews are paralyzing our will and ability to resist annihilation. In an environment without Jews, “We can whip every other race with both hands tied behind our backs. . . . . We must do something about the Jews—soon. And clearly the key to getting the Jews off our backs is to regain control of our mass media.”

Germany briefly demonstrated that successful opposition to Jews by whites might be possible, as did Spain and Portugal in the 15th century. As the second most dominant race on earth, whites are in a better position than anyone else to halt the destructive process. First, though, we must marshal the determination and ingenuity to do so.

24 Comments

Personally, I always try to gauge a persons behavior by their race and therefore find these articles on racial dominance/characteristics especially interesting. I would like to briefly share my observations: Jews are very good at manipulating large groups/societies for their survival, whereas other semites, such as Arabs, are good at exploiting others on a one on one level for their survival; we whites are good at influencing nature to our advantage (engineering, farming, etc), while blacks are naturally content, happy to be, instinctual people and asian’s patience enables them to excel in detailed work. But none, except us, even the more “intelligent” jews cannot innovate matter, thoughts yes, but not matter; not cars, not machinery, not food and so on. If they rid us, they are not only destroying something nature made, but also “human”progression. We are made by nature and work with nature. For all I know they are made by the devil and work against nature. Nature is God.

We can gauge the depth of our fellow white nationalists understanding of the problem by how they react to other races. If a white nationalist becomes incensed with anger at the sight of a black and white coupling he or she is displaying a healthy reaction. However, if this same individual is mostly oblivious to couplings between whites and Asians for example, he or she is a reactionary. These white nationalists are stimulated by the ugliness, savagery and brutality of blacks (as I am too). However, as disgusting as these displays are, our most dangerous threat comes from non-whites that can most resemble us in externals and affect our behavior and mannerisms. If the non-white can successfully accomplish this feat, then white compassion and generosity will overlook any other differences. The white that can understand this and the implications is the true white nationalist. Revilo P. Oliver covered this in one of his speeches in the 60s decade when he analyzed the defective traits of the average white man or women. To reiterate, our greatest danger comes from the more intelligent non-whites who can most resemble us in externals and affect our behavior and mannerisms such as the millions of nubile Asian females that enter our country every year. They still retain the ability to affect demure, reserved and supportive behavior that most spoiled white women have thrown away.

Jews are biological weapons of the Demiurge. It is in their blood and cannot be escaped. Their only purpose in life is to destroy Aryans, period. They are genetic meat puppets designed to lie, obfuscate, and subvert but only Aryans, not the other races. They can do this by crafty friendliness or other means, but the goal is always the same. No matter if the Jew seems benign in his intentions, friendly, generous, etc. Their ‘blood memory’ will always call them back to their purpose.

That is all they have ever done and all they will ever do. As soon as Europeans understand this, the sooner the way forward becomes crystal clear.

That’s false as I see it. The jews of today are an mixed bunch of european-caucasian(khazar or not)-semitic and even african (ethiopian) blood. There is pehaps a semitic “dominance” in their admixture but they are not one homogenous ethnicity descended from ancient Israelites (or whatever the story is). Even many jews have written about this (Sand, Koestler, Elkhaik) and have been scolded by the zionist community.

I would rather say that their writings and beliefs, like the Talmud, are the drivers of the political agenda.

Primarily, the battle is metaphysical, but we are given tools and alternatives which follow an exclusively empirical methodology. A Jewish view of the world. What the Jews seek to destroy in Aryans are two things: the Will to Power and the creative genius. They do this through institutionalized mockery (Critical Studies) and empirical science. Empirical science must be married to metaphysical thinking. It was with Newton and Tesla and others of course.

The jews probably rolled over and nearly died laughing when they first observed whites in Europe give their children jewish names from the bible, I know I would have if I were a jew. That is when the jews started their centuries-old establishment of total dominance. The jews have been practicing psychological warfare on whites for over two thousand years, living in our midst cataloging our strengths and weaknesses, exploiting them to their benefit when possible. To give perspective to the problem, imagine that you are standing in the back of a christian church observing a service. Now imagine that the women are placed on one side, the men on the other. Now watch the priest, pastor, or minister dispensing subversive jewish propaganda, stirring the witches cauldron. Visualize forces rotating in an opposing manner above the women and the men as the shaman stirs the cauldron. The worst traits and values are emphasized and encouraged for over two thousand years. If you can visualize this scenario you can begin to understand the problem with white christians. That is just one dimension of our problem, how many movies have we watched with whites displaying artifacts of non-white culture: the ubiquitous samurai sword, the black artwork, the non-white forms of music; on ad infinitium nauseam. Observe the white teenager (and many times older individual) running around in their Bob Marley shirt (or some such subversive item) listening to non-white music forms. It is disgusting the way that non-whites have been able to destroy white culture without firing a shot.

That’s beyond silly. Solzhenitysn’s Two Hundred Years Together is a wealth of information about Russian/Jewish history. The mass exodus of Jews from Russia was not caused by real anti-Semitism, but simply moves to reduce Jews’ massively over-privileged status just a bit so that other groups could rise. But Jewish neurosis and their sense of entitlement had a multiplier effect, so even these token gestures to pare back their privileges were experienced as making bricks for the Red Pharaoh, and Jews started looking for an exit. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aliyah#Aliyah_from_the_Soviet_Union_and_post-Soviet_states

Enough Jews remained to be huge problems, of course, but the point is that simply a social consensus that Jews were too powerful and token attempts not to dismantle their power but just put limits on it was enough to cause them to leave a society that they had once dominated even more thoroughly than the US. Food for thought.

Let’s not slit our throats just yet. “Identification” is the issue because unlike Aryans or other gentiles, jews are still too cowardly to “take the crown”. They would call it ‘tactical’ yes but to the masses, their dominance is at best, a subconscious reality. They know the moment it becomes ‘overt’ that they’ll be crushed like bugs and we know it too. That’s the sad situation we’re in.

I always found it best to mock them in this manner. Call them out as cowards first… to compare them to Conquistadors or any other historical European conquerors is a disgrace.

As Nietschze put it: “But there can be no doubt: consider to whom one bows down in Rome itself today — and not only in Rome but over almost half the earth, everywhere that
man has become tame or desires to become tame: in front of three Jews, as is known, and one Jewess(Jesus of Nazareth, the fisherman Peter, the rug
weaver Paul, and the mother of the aforementioned Jesus, named Mary). This is very remarkable: without doubt Rome has been conquered. (Genealogy,
1.16)”

My take would be to dump all religion, even European paganism, and sink into ruthless tribalism with whatever that would lead up to.

Context matters. Blacks tend to dominate one on one in low class areas or situations. But on the macro level, Jews, being smarter on average, and far more unified, can pack an incredible punch. Whites are like big guys trying to fight, but too drunk to hurt each other. It doesn’t matter how strong you are if you are uncoordinated and unable to focus your power. We are just too disunited and confused to focus so we are defeated again and again.

Solutions? Long term only. Meta-politics and an unending campaign of education about the Jews. Mockery is gold as Alinsky said. Use not only their methods but also their buzz words against them. Like “Never Again.”

“For Jews are as dominant over us in their way as we were over non-whites in ours.”

I must confess, I find all this talk of ‘dominance’ rather silly. If it makes you feel better to shout “Whites rule, OK!” then fine. But the “Christian Civilization” that Grant, Stoddard and Teddy Roosevelt thought was “taking up the White man’s burden’ had already been infiltrated by the Jewish Virus for 19 centuries.

The ink wasn’t dry on their books before the Jew took formal control (Yockey’s Revolution of 1933). How long did the White man “dominate”? One generation? It was all over by 1945. By 1948 the Chinese and Hindus had thrown out the White man, and WITHOUT Jewish control That’s why the Chinese are allowed to revere Mao as “The Hero of the XXth Century” while Hitler is the archetype of evil and Yockey a fringe nut who died in prison. The Chinese, like the Jew, can plan for generations.

So no, the Jew doesn’t rule us as we ruled the coloreds — implying, they took over ruling the colors. The Jew rules us, period, and the colors are free. Some “dominant” race. I suggest we junk this Darwinian nonsense (as Ludovici and Yockey insisted) and look to the Traditional wisdom of China and India for our models.

I must disagree with you. For example in Japan print critical of the Jews is often target by Jewish organizations and pulled back. And every country that has a U.S. military base in it is militarily occupied by the Jews. This includes countries in but not limited to, Asia, Africa, the Middle east and so on. There are very few nations not controlled by the Jews, one of those few being Iran. However it is on their “Hit list”. Just like any other sovereign nation.

And I honestly must say that taking wisdom from Asians is not productive. What does that say about our own kind? We look to others for enlightenment rather than our own? We are rich in wisdom, in this day and age we need to learn tactics.

My personal way of (trying) to help people build some fight against these genocidal monsters is to encourage personal health. White people (and others) have become utterly bloated and physically despondent in just the past one to two generations.

David Duke and Jack Donovan (among many others in both the WN and libertarian communities) have advocated the paleo diet, and I heartfully agree.

Whites (and anybody else) need to cut WAY back on sugar and grains, and return to natural foods loaded with saturated fat and dietary cholesterol. And whites need to stop guzzling beer (note how every movie shows white dudes guzzling beer – like ‘Thor’ – as the manly thing to do, when in fact it makes you impotent and have a beer belly).

I know this sounds off-topic, but everybody I know seems impotent and/or infertile, and I believe that white people need to restore their physical vitality before they can take on an enemy. God knows we can’t make our own ethnostate out of a bunch of bloated, effeminate, servile, and childless dudes.

No such diet was common among the SS soldiers on the east front nor in the trenches in WW2, there were al on bread, potatoes, soup and some stewed meat, and they sure did not lack anything masculine. Paleo diet is, although it makes some good points, the epithome of political correctness as it does not mention race never. It boasts about primitive man and its diet, but never about the pill, abortion, radiation from microwaves in all our high tech and most of all it never talks about the most primal of instinct, the defense of your tribe or your race.
Worse it is a multicultural diet for everyone refusing to see into the race factor.
Whites are white and tall and big brained while they ate diary, and practiced animal husbandry for 15.000 years, yet paleo refuses to see the link between this sound base of our diet and our performances over the millenia, worse it wishes us to eat shrimps, advocados, and pineapple as its totem Mark Sisson preaches, things we never ate.
We did eat bread for 10.000 of years though.
Yes some races are resistant to bread and gluten and non allergic to milk products, we are among them. Without bread we would never have built any castle, nor trenches, not enough energy. This said, paleo has some very good things, like eating biological, local and grass-fed meat, but still it overlooks the essential of any cromagnon, race and its adaptation to diet and neglects totally the instinct of selfpreservation of one’s race.

Excellent article btw, yes we are being dominated only because we allow them to.

Speaking of SS soldiers and health, etc., Hitler wanted all of his Germans to grow their own veggies, and eat healthy. He also wanted no smoking & drinking alcohol – more so during baby-making years for both sexes. His aim was healthy living for all Germans and white race in general.

The paleo diet (I believe there are several variants) is a therapeutic diet, just as vegan, high-starch/lowfat, and raw food diets are. Health problems ensue, though, when the followers of these regimens don’t know when to stop. It may take as long as 5-10 years for deficiencies to set in. For others, it’s only six months or a year before serious cravings for the supposedly “bad” foods arrive. I see this all the time. Some paleo-ites want sugar really bad so they defend their uncontrollable craving for it by telling themselves that chocolate is “full of antioxidants” so therefore it’s good for them.

Except for some aboriginal stoneage tribes, the rest of us have the genes to be able to digest and thrive on good quality, properly prepared grains (fermented bread, e.g.), other carbs, legumes, the much-reviled dairy foods and other food forbidden by some versions of paleo eating. It’s not correct to attribute all the weakness, infertility, obesity, etc. in modern society to diet alone. There are a host of other factors, which I am sure you know about. A strict diet can help cure all that, but it’s only a part of the picture.

The past 10,000 years of grain cultivation are certainly not some kind of mistake, something to repent of. We were adapted to a healthy civilized diet and it’s only recently that most of us have stopped eating real food and gone over to weird, industrial food analogs thanks to the food scientists, who know how to make everything tasty. Of course, the case has been made that agriculture is indeed the cause of everything wrong with the world and we just need to go back to wandering around in tribes. Maybe so. Let’s see what Penti Linkola thinks…