Pak-Afghan Border Reopened: Alternatives for Pakistan?

Behind the scenes, diplomatic efforts, particularly by the United Kingdom, as well as intense lobbying by the business community and civil society has finally yielded fruit.

Life at and through Torkham and Chaman border to Afghanistan will now return to normal, allowing tens of thousands of people and vehicles to travel either side of the border. The order to open the borders came after the UK special envoy Mark L.Grant hosted a meeting between Pakistan’s advisor on foreign affairs, Sartaj Aziz, and the Afghan National Security Advisor (NSA) Hanif Atmar in London late last week.

Pakistan had used “TTP-led terrorist sanctuaries” and a spate of attacks as the justification for the closure on February 17. That is why a statement issued by the Prime Minister House, quoted PM Nawaz as hoping the Afghan government would address the reasons that led to the closing of the border.

Pakistan’s message behind Afghan border closure

Bilateral relations had dipped to a new low after Pakistan slammed the border shut, alleging the Afghan authorities had failed in checking anti-Pakistan terrorists operating out of eastern Afghanistan.

In this context, one could assume, Pakistan’s unilateral action was designed to deliver three key messages to the Afghan government.

Firstly, a unilateral opening of the border without reciprocity and some sense of understanding on border management in a situation complicated by terrorist and criminal syndicates will not be possible.

Secondly, how could Pakistan help in the peace process if neither the Kabul government nor the Taliban are ready for talks; with Pakistan beset by its own limitations.

Resumption of talks and fighting the common enemy depends on Kabul, Afghan officials were told. The third message was to stop looking at Pakistan through the Indian or US prism. Unless we conduct the relationship bilaterally, and independent of the historical baggage, it will be hard to move out of the current stand-off.

Beyond Boundaries

Although the border will ease life for tens of thousands, repairing the damage to Pakistan’s image in Afghanistan will be an extremely formidable challenge. Top businessmen from Pakistan and Afghanistan, brought together by a private initiative Beyond Boundaries in Islamabad to lobby for the opening of the border, also delivered the same message.

Pointing out at least half a dozen abrupt closures of the border within last 12 months, corruption by customs police officials between Karachi and the border itself, and arbitrary raised by Pakistan in taxes of seasonal fruits and vegetables, Afghan and their Pakistani counterparts warned that business is fast moving away from Pakistan to Iran and Central Asia. Only a more professional and pragmatic approach could restore levels of bilateral and transit trade via Pakistan to the peak of $ 2.5 billion in 2010, they said.

Alternatives for Pakistan

Only a rational bilateral approach anchored in law and diplomatic norms can help the two countries avoid acrimony, suspicion and more bloodshed.

Pakistan needs to work on multiple fronts.

First, it has to – through demonstrable actions – blunt the Afghan allegations that its territory serves as the strategic backyard for the Afghan Taliban and the Haqqani network militants.

Secondly, it needs to push for a rationally drastic review of the bilateral and transit trade agreements under a third-party vigil. In order to quell Afghan reservations and also address frequent complaints of willful violations or high-handed deviations by Pakistani customs and police officials, the government shall have to anchor the bilateral and transit trade regime in internationally accepted and practiced regimes relevant to landlocked countries.

Thirdly, transit trade access is as much an obligation on Pakistan as it is the duty of the Afghan government and businesses to deal with the issue professionally rather than act out of a bloated sense of entitlement.

Fourth, a 2,560 km porous border and a volatile situation complicated by trans-border terrorist and criminal networks place a huge responsibility on both Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Only a rational bilateral approach anchored in law and diplomatic norms can help the two countries avoid acrimony, suspicion and more bloodshed.

Imtiaz Gul is the founder and Executive Director of Center for Research and Security Studies. He is a prominent columnist and author of several books including “Pakistan: Before & After Osama Bin Laden”.

Imtiaz Gul is the founder and Executive Director of Center for Research and Security Studies, an Islamabad-based think tank that he founded in December 2007. He is a prominent columnist and author of several books on South Asia including “Pakistan: Before & After Osama Bin Laden”.
He regularly appears as an analyst on Pakistani TV channels as well as the Doha-based Al-Jazeera English/Arabic satellite TV channel for his expertise in areas such as Afghanistan/Tribal Areas / and the Kashmir militancy.
He is a prominent columnist writing for the Express Tribune, Daily Times, Foreign Policy and many others. He is the author of several books on South Asia, his latest book “Pakistan: Before & After Osama Bin Laden”.
He regularly appears as an analyst on Pakistani TV channels as well as the Doha-based Al-Jazeera English/Arabic satellite TV channel for his expertise in areas such as Afghanistan/Tribal Areas / and the Kashmir militancy.
He has presented papers and given talks at universities and international security and counter-terror conferences in Brussels, Tokyo, Berlin, New Delhi, Kabul, New York, Washington, the Hague, Riyadh, Italy, Oslo, Stockholm, Beijing.
http://www.imtiazgul.com/

Global Village Space has been created as a web portal for the disseminating information and knowledge from our writers to our readers. It is not about us but about you. It developed as an idea from a newsletter we have been producing and been sending out the past several years. The special essence of that newsletter was to provide our readers different viewpoints on the same issue without us the ‘moderator’ imposing our own viewpoint.