The Dirty Truth About Why Democrats Support Illegal Immigration. They Are Counted For Congressional Appointment

Apportionment is the process of dividing the 435 memberships, or seats, in the U.S. House of Representatives among the 50 states.Who is included in the apportionment population counts?

The apportionment calculation is based upon the total resident population (citizens and non-citizens) of the 50 states. In the 2010 Census, the apportionment population also includes U.S. Armed Forces personnel and federal civilian employees stationed outside the United States (and their dependents living with them) that can be allocated, based on administrative records, back to a home state. This is the same procedure used in 2000.”

What affects does this have on America? You would think this would be a question our Politicians and media would ask if they had The U.S. Citizens interests in mind. Instead, all you hear are the emotional arguments pounded day and night on our media. They do not report the truth that because of Illegal Immigration California has gained 9 seats in the House of Representatives and Michigan has lost 2.

“We examine how current immigration policy affects the allocation of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. Because the current level of immigration is so high (eight to 10 million immigrants arrive each decade) and because immigrants settle unevenly across the country (75 percent live in just six states), immigration causes the population in some states to increase much more rapidly than in others. Since seats in the House are reapportioned every 10 years based on each state’s population relative to the rest of the country, and all persons — citizens, legal immigrants, and illegal aliens — who are counted in the census are included in the apportionment calculations, immigration is having a significant effect on the distribution of seats in the House. And as seats are redistributed, so is political power in Washington.”

“There are now a number of districts in the country where the majority of adults are non-citizens. In the 1996 election, for example, only 55,000 votes were cast in the immigrant-heavy 33rd district of California, and in the 25th district of Texas only 51,000 votes were cast. This is about one-fourth the average vote count of 226,000 for the typical district in Michigan — one of the states losing the most from immigration. In fact, in 1996, there were a total of 11 districts in California and seven in Texas where the total number of votes cast was less than half the number cast in the typical Michigan district. The small number of votes cast in many California and Texas districts is almost entirely a by-product of mass immigration. In California alone, there were nearly six million non-citizen immigrants in 1997, enough to create eight or nine congressional districts. As a practical matter, this situation gives significantly more political power to voting citizens living in districts made up mostly of non-citizens.

In effect, the ballots of voters in high-immigrant districts carry far more weight than the ballots of voters who live in districts made up of citizens. This seeming contradiction of the principle of “one man one vote” exists because the courts have interpreted this principle to mean that districts should be equal in total population — not ineligible voters. This, coupled with the fact that some districts are drawn to ensure a Hispanic majority, makes for districts with very few citizens.”

As you can see there are very serious Consequences for turning a blind eye to this issue. This is about votes and control. Democrats could care less about Refugees to them it is all about votes. They do not even care about their fellow citizens. Our media ignores facts like this and call you a Nazi or white supremacist for dare mentioning them.