JOHN BRUMMETT: Meanness' best hope

The spasmodically thoughtful governor reported that the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for Washington, D.C., had decided to move more quickly than typical on whether he may resume meanness in Arkansas.

What he wants is to start back throwing poor Arkansas people off Medicaid for the political advantage of it.

Hutchinson put it differently in his tweet, saying, "DC Circuit granted the motion to expedite in the [Arkansas Works] case. Argument will be no later than October. It is good to have the support of the president and [the Department of Justice]."

Ah, yes. Those indeed are the allies Arkansas' meanness requires--a profane, prevaricating and justice-obstructing president as pre-emptively defended by a politically sold-out federal attorney general.

You have all that on one side. You have poor people living in places without job opportunities on the other.

Oh, and you also have the law.

It is on the poor people's side, unless the right wing successfully uses the courts to remake it.

Donald Trump, William Barr, Our Man Asa, the governor's frightful right flank in Arkansas--all are known to have decried federal judges who "make law" rather than merely "interpret" it. But in this case, it is Trump, Barr, Our Man Asa and his frightful flank in Arkansas who seek to have judges "make law."

There plainly exists no federal statute permitting Medicaid to function as a work-requirement or as anything other than a health-care safety net for people otherwise unable to afford medical insurance.

Until recently, the United States liked to think of itself as a place where the sick would not go unattended.

Surely you know the backstory, but in case you've somehow forgotten: To save Obamacare's Medicaid expansion in Arkansas, a noble thing, Hutchinson rebranded the program "Arkansas Works" and lured the votes of mean-spirited right-wing legislators with a promise that he'd throw people off if they didn't prove they were working or seeking work, and volunteering if not finding work.

The Trump administration, liking remote-state meanness when it saw it, ran with the notion--which began in Arkansas and that other thoughtful and compassionate jurisdiction, Kentucky.

The program started with a user-unfriendly computer-click requirement through a portal apparently designed by Maze Makers Inc.

Groups advocating for the poor, citing that the federal Medicaid law speaks only of expanding health care and not of telling people to stick their illnesses where the sun fails to shine, filed suit.

A federal judge in D.C., a Democratic nominee devoted to imposing and not remaking law in this instance, threw out the Arkansas atrocity.

Hutchinson, needing to assure his right flank that his meanness would persist, announced promptly that he'd asked the Trump administration to seek an expedited appeal of this supposedly misbegotten ruling that Medicaid was an "entitlement," to use right-wing code.

(It's simply a health-care helping hand for poor people, which is such an odd thing to demonize in a Christianity-professing society.)

Asa professed to take consolation that the judge hadn't specifically axed the computer-click requirement. But that was because the judge said he didn't need to get to that because the very concept was so blatantly bogus on its face under the law.

So Asa's exclamation on Twitter the other day was an announcement that the appeal had been expedited. Arguments will be heard by October, which passes for expediting.

Meanwhile, the Hutchinson administration has done nothing to restore coverage to the 16,000 to 18,000 people it had kicked off, since the federal court did not order that.

Those poor souls' best hope is to get seriously ill or injured and wind up in an emergency room. From there, hospital administrators could begin the process of re-enrolling them in Medicaid--even without their having to wake from a coma to take a job or click a computer.

For Hutchinson's information--and he knows as much, because his Twitter exclamation was more political than substantive--the D.C. Circuit appeals court has more nominees of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama than George W. Bush and now Trump. Thus, expedited or not, odds at the circuit level favor decency and enforcing the law, not making new right-wing law.

Asa's best hope for lasting exclamation probably hinges on whether he can take this dark-side policy to the new Trump-installed dark side of the U.S. Supreme Court--to Brett Kavanaugh, Neil Gorsuch, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and maybe the chief, John Roberts.

There hasn't been enough death or retirement on the D.C. Circuit to yet ruin it. It was Anthony Kennedy's decision to retire from swing-vote fame on the U.S. Supreme Court that sent Kavanaugh to the highest court in the land.

That's how it came to be that a preppy beer-keg connoisseur probably offers Arkansas meanness its best hope.

------------v------------

John Brummett, whose column appears regularly in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, is a member of the Arkansas Writers' Hall of Fame. Email him at jbrummett@arkansasonline.com. Read his @johnbrummett Twitter feed.

Comments

It’s not just the poor; adults with Developmental Delay and Autism received the same threatening letter Found yesterday in his laundry. April 9 -“you must provide all verification by April 19 or your case will be closed.” Verification is pay stubs. He’s been fired twice; here we go again...

Funny how the GOP doesn't want "activists" judges, except when they do. There is absolutely nothing in the Medicaid laws that allows for a work requirement, but now the GOP wants them to find one. The hypocrisy knows no bounds.

jesus went about healing, but the gop goes about doing what make the list to be one of them there those hypocrites. You are either for or against the man. Now the gop ilks will come back with that "other gospel" , which many say was the actual gospel of he many call lord and savior, instead of the saul guy.

There is absolutely nothing wrong in requiring able bodied adults to work as a prerequisite for a government benefit. They get the money they earn from working. And, perhaps they get a full time job with health insurance. Why would anyone be against that?

"It's simply a health-care helping hand for poor people, which is such an odd thing to demonize in a Christianity-professing society." Pretty much says it all regarding the pseudo-Christian republicans.Peace and love haters.

I wish Christians would actually read the Bible. Granted, it is full of truly messed-up stories and concepts, but like all the other holy books, if you pay attention, you can learn how to treat people well. For instance, there is this guy named Jesus who appears in both the Bible and the Qur'an. He said crazy stuff like: "...go, sell what you own, and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me." And "Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God. Blessed are you who are hungry now, for you will be filled." Nothing about a work requirement in order for the rest of us to help the least among us. Guess that wasn't so important to him. Weird, eh?