Bill O’Reilly’s Elitist Pompous Assininity.

Bill O’Reilly put the Pomp in Pompous Assininity.

Bill O’Reilly is an elitist,
egotistical pompous ass. In fact, Bill O’Reilly put the pomp in pompous
assininity. My Marcie likes his show, and I have to admit I like most
of the content, but when I watch O’Reilly, most of the time he just
irritates me. He rarely lets anyone complete a sentence without just
talking over them, and that’s just rude. But what is worse than that is
his superior and condescending attitude toward everyone, including his
own audience, and – this is important – his lack of proper principles.

A long time ago, somewhere else in this website, I
forget where, I’m sure I made mention of that old scandal involving one
Andrea Mackris who accused him of sexual harassment and identified him
as a “Phone Perv,” meaning a pervert who enjoyed masturbating while in
lewd phone conversation with someone. There were supposedly recorded
phone tapes of this stuff. But the whole case magically just went away
and was suddenly hushed up, allegedly at a cost of umpty-ump million
dollars from our Billy boy. Who doesn’t want to talk about it. Which
tells me that there is something about it that cannot stand the light of
day. I remember thinking, at the time, that if such a charge came up
against me and it was false, that I would loudly and publicly challenge
the accuser and settle it just as publicly as possible, and fiercely
prosecute the accuser for whatever prosecution was possible. O’Reilly
didn’t do that; he paid to keep it quiet, and that is what originally
brought him low in my estimation.

But it goes deeper. He apparently doesn’t even know the real
difference between the Right and the Left in American politics. He is
of the school that thinks that ideology in and of itself is somehow bad, and that all ideologues
are therefore bad, regardless of the ideas or ideals represented by
their specific ideology. And what that says is that he doesn’t even
know what it is that forms the foundation and make-up of a political
party, or even a political argument or position. A reasoned political
position is, almost definitively, ideological, unless, of course, it is
all fluff and no substance.

Holding no ideology of his own, O'Reilly just drifts with the wind.

Earlier this week he interviewed Sarah Palin, and she
actually managed to complete a sentence or two, which is rare for anyone
talking to O’Reilly. But Bill’s two big points of contention with her,
which he kept hammering at, were whether she thought there was such a
thing as being too far to the Right, and whether she insisted on
“ideological purity” over elect-ability in new Republican
candidates for office. After the interview, he let us all know that he
believes that someone could indeed be “too far Right” and that
insistence on “ideological purity” was somehow a negative. He liked to
be more middle-of-the-road in everything. Fair and Balanced, I suppose.

Right.

American Right versus Left
is somewhat different than in other countries, and considerably
different than the current definitions out of American academia, which
has a decided Marxist slant to begin with. In so-called Communist
lands, a Conservative, or a man of the Right, is a good, stalwart
supporter of Marx’s theories and of the Communist Manifesto. A Liberal,
or man of the Left, is a “revisionist” enemy of the state, who opposes
some part of Marx’s theories and the Communist Manifesto, in favor of
individual liberty in some form or another. In the so-called free
world, this is reversed; a Conservative is the protector of individual
liberty, and a Liberal is one who would move the system toward state
control, ostensibly in the name of equality.

But there is a fly in the ointment, brought about by a
secret pact between Joseph Stalin and Adolph Hitler, and the subsequent
feud between them once the secret pact was broken. Both Stalin and
Hitler were Marxists, although of somewhat differing interpretation of
Marxism. They secretly used each other in political intrigues to
advance themselves within their own nations. Stalin demonized Nazism
(National Socialism,) Hitler demonized Bolshevism (Communism,) and they
secretly aided each other in their consolidation of absolute power
within their nations. You can see the details in the Marxism page, if it interests you. Here I will only make the point that Communism advanced in the Soviet Union under the banner of Anti Fascism, and Nazism advanced in Germany under the banner of Anti Communism. It is crucial for young Americans to understand this point: Both Stalin and Hitler were Marxists.

The secret non-aggression pact was broken, of course, when Hitler
invaded Russia. The Soviet Union maintained and exaggerated the false
and invented Anti Fascism nature of Communism throughout World
War II and after; foreign Marxists took up the chant, and it came to be
“common knowledge” that Fascism and Nazism were somehow opposite
to Communism, and that view is what is touted by all Marxists today.
Communism on the Left, Nazi-Fascism on the Right. To be “too far Right”
is to be approaching Nazi-Fascism; to be “too far Left” is to be
approaching Communism. Of course, this is as false today as it was when
it originated in the secret non-aggression pact between Stalin and
Hitler.

The original Communist lie
remains intact: to be too far Right is to be Nazi-Fascist. Most
Americans today have been educated in that particular lie all their
lives. In truth, Nazi-Fascism has its roots in Marxism, and is
therefore Leftist. Hitler, after all, was an avowed follower of Marx.

We said that, in the Free World, a Conservative is one
who seeks or protects individual rights against the state, and a Liberal
is one who seeks or protects the state’s right to rule the individual.
(Here, now, Liberal has lost its older and more honored meaning of open minded seeker and moved to meaning political favoring of statism/Marxism.)
The balance goes back and forth between the two arguments of
individual rights versus the power of the state. In America, it is
somewhat different than anywhere else on earth, because of our unique
American founding and constitution documents, and the Principles upon
which America is based.

America, as founded and constituted, is a unique and
wonderful idea and ideal as well as a wonderful nation full of
opportunity for the individual. The unique American idea and ideal may
be thought of as an ideology. It is the ideology of the American
Conservative, or man of the Right. The American Conservative sees the
Declaration of Independence as a carefully worded and particularly
wonderful blessing of a nation; and a golden chord of principled words
that bind a unique people to their Creator and to each other. The
American Conservative sees the Constitution as a fixed legal document,
written in English, that says very specific legal things, organizing the
American government, and laying the rules for how it operates.

But, Bill O’Reilly doesn’t like “pure” ideology, and he
thinks it is possible to be too far to the Right. So, in his view,
Sarah Palin (and all the rest of us) should not completely hold
to the American ideal, and she ( and all the rest of us) should be ready
to trash parts of the Declaration and the Constitution. In the
interest of – what, exactly? Perhaps he too is educated in the old
Communist lie, and he sees Sarah Palin (and the rest of us) as leaning
toward Nazi-Fascism. Personally, I don’t think he knows his Right from
his Left, or even Up from Down.

The Marxist Nature of the Democrat
Party and the point by point close affinity between the Communist
Manifesto and the Democrat Party Platform was discussed in the recent Blessed Polarization
page. For over a hundred years the Democrat Party has been doing to
America, in little bites and nibbles, what Lenin did to Russia in one
fell swoop. Point by point. The Fed; the Income Tax; Organized Labor
Unions; “Public” Education; etc., etc., etc. All of these things came
out of the Communist Manifesto, not out of our founding and constituting
documents. None of them are among the enumerated things our government
is constituted to do, and therefore our government is not supposed to
be doing them, because they are unconstitutional. All of them are
designed and intended to drive the American system toward inefficiency,
breakdown and eventual failure.

Comrade Obama merely brought it all to a head, so to
speak, by putting the Democrat program on steroids, and ripping off
limbs rather than taking little nibbles like his Democrat predecessors.
He woke us up and made us pay attention to what was going on. As we
became more aware, we began to get together, and we began brewing Tea.

Now, elitist snobs and pompous asses like Bill O’Reilly
see Sarah Palin as some kind of far-out, kooky, Right Wing extremist,
an uncompromising ideologue, and therefore of low political
qualification for a run for office. I ask you to compare her
qualifications to those of Comrade Obama. Compare her ideology to that
of Biden. Compare her extremism to that of Hillary. Compare her clear
representation of the ideals of we the people to anyone in Washington.

Republican “spokesmen”
like Carl Rove, Newt Gingrich and others, and “professional” Republican
office-holders like Trent Lott and others have publicly criticized not
only Sarah, but our choices for office, such as Christine O’Donnel in
Delaware, as being “extreme” and “inexperienced” and “unsophisticated”
and “outside the mainstream” and “unelectable” and therefore examples of
“Tea Party Mistakes.”

Excuse me?

Christine O’Donnel won her primary race against the RINO the
Republican Party preferred. She beat him. They said only he could win,
but she beat him. There are none so blind as they who will not see. Carl Rove went so far as to publicly attack her
on the day of her victory; her State Republican Party refused to
support her in any way. He may as well have been working for the
Marxocrat side. All of these big-time Republican “leaders” and other
pompous asses like O’Reilly repeatedly minimalized her in the eyes of
the voting public by either attacking her outright or damning her with
faint praise. Christine was not the only one; the same thing was going
on in Nevada, Alaska and other places, but I will stick to Christine
O’Donnel because Delaware is such a good example of what we’re talking
about here.

Christine beat her so-called “moderate” Republican
adversary who would likely have voted with the Obamunist cause a
significant percentage of the time, and the official Party big shots
flew into a blue snit and refused to support her in any way. Why were
they so in love with their Lefty candidate, and why did they express
such animosity toward Christine?

Because that is what effete snobs and pompous asses do.
Who the hell did these Tea Partiers think they were? The Party Elites
know best how to run and win political races and the last thing they
need is any rank amateurs diddling around with the “professional” Party
game plan.

Christine O’Donnell lost her final race not because of
anything the Tea Party did or did not do; she lost her race solely and
exclusively because of Republican Party actions and inactions, and the
continuous negative running commentary of so many big name jackasses
like Bill O’Reilly. They operated in direct opposition to another Tea
Party candidate, and that fact should not be lost on us, nor should it
be forgotten by we the people. The Party preferred a quasi-Communist
Republican candidate because they didn’t know how to run a real American
Constitutionalist candidate against a flat-out philosophical Communist
Democrat opponent. Read that sentence again. They thought such a contest would be impossible. And their elitist feelings were hurt, so they not only didn’t support the victorious Republican candidate, but they opposed her.

Never forget that.

The Republican Party is in business not to support
Conservatism or to support the Constitution, but to do political
competition, pure and simple, and they are exceptionally jealous of
their own elite controlling position in all things relating to
Republican political races. They don’t care nearly as much about
America as they do about the nuts and bolts of political campaigning and
being the political experts and go-to people for all candidates and all
issues. We the people, disorganized and unprofessional people that we
are, stepped on their toes and dared to trespass on their turf. And so
they set out to teach us a lesson by working to the detriment of
Christine O’Donnell’s chances.

Christine O’Donnell publicly announced that the so-called Constitutional Principle of Separation of
Church and State may not be found in the Constitution, thereby
setting off a flurry of public howling tantrums by lots of big-time
ignorant clowns like O’Reilly who were certain, certain that she
was dead wrong about that. But she was quite correct. It ain’t there.
Never was. Go to the link to see. Here we see the mal-education and
the sheer stupidity of the elitists coming to the forefront, for all the
world to see. And they are the ones who call her
unsophisticated, loopy and fringe. They who screamed that she was wrong
are themselves the ones who are wrong about it. They just don’t know
any better, poor fools.

Christine made some public negative references to
masturbation, and that set off another tirade of negativity. Apparently
O’Reilly, Rove and friends like to masturbate, see it as a healthy
activity, recommend it to others, would like to see it normalized,
embraced and accepted in all social circles just like open
homosexuality, and they probably contribute to and support the
multi-billion dollar Masturbation Industry,
and defend it as free expression. They see opposition to masturbation,
or even using the word sin, as loopy, fringe, and far Right, and
politically indefensible. In their circles, masturbation is normal,
socially acceptable and fine, and the word sin is not to be considered.
Which is probably just about the way things were when Lot walked away
from ancient Sodom and Gomorrah. Lot, like Christine, was the oddball.

Christine makes no secret of her Christian faith, and that lights up
more fires of controversy with the likes of O’Reilly, Rove and other
detractors, because public reverence of and reference to Jesus Christ is
seen as loopy, fringe and far Right wing, in their families and their
circles. Religion is out, as far as they are concerned; to be a good
Republican candidate worthy of support one must either be or appear to
be a follower of the silly superstition of Atheism,
like them. If O’Reilly is any kind of a Christian or any kind of a Jew
then he has a damned funny way of showing it. Among the elite and the
pseudo-sophisticated, it is best to avoid God altogether. This is
probably just about the way things were when Jonah first approached
Nineveh and announced the 40 day warning. Jonah, like Christine, was
the oddball.

The elite sophists who either oppose Christine
O’Donnell or dismiss her as a loser are all men-of-the-world, and we all
know who rules the world. In the best case, these snobs do not know who rules the world; in the worst case, they do.

We the people know
better than the experts what this contest is about. We don’t give a
damn about political Party turf, expertise, machinations and stratagems.
We need more candidates like Christine O’Donnell in office. Period.
All those Tea Party supported candidates who made it into office need to
join Michelle Bachman’s Constitution Caucus and use it to co-opt
the Republican Party. Trent Lott needs to be sidelined until he can be
dismissed. New state legislatures under Republican control thanks to
Tea Party victories need to form their own state-level Constitution
Caucuses and begin to take charge of the state political Parties. Only
when the professional politicians are pushed aside may we begin to
consider the restoration of the Constitution and the rebuilding of
America rather than merely rebuilding the Republican Party. We need to
take the Party over, or replace it. It’s not doing America any good the
way it is. In the ideal situation, candidates would run on principle
rather than Party platforms; but that may be too much to hope for.

The President must be put on defense and kept there;
impeachment action should commence, even if it cannot be successful.
The charges and the arguments should be made, as publicly as possible, repeatedly. When an attempt does not succeed, modify it and do it again.

Obamacare and other Obamanations need to be totally repealed, with no talk of correcting or modifying. In Blessed Polarization
we laid out the clear relationship between specific elements in the
Communist Manifesto and the Democrat Party agenda. The whole of the
Democrat agenda is Marxist and opposed to the Declaration of
Independence and the Constitution. That’s just crystal clear. The
march of Marxism through American law has been going on for more decades
than any of us have been alive, and Obama has bumped the anti and gone
all in, in what looks to be a push to destroy all that America is.

Beyond legislating, executing and adjudicating law, the
Constitution lays out three major responsibilities of the federal
government:

National Defense.

Border Security.

Postal Service.

Only one of these, defense, is done well, and the Democrat strategy is
to weaken and hinder it, and defense represents the sole, solitary
budget the Democrats will ever even consider cutting.

Article 1 Section 8 nowhere identifies doctors, nurses
or medical insurance agents as government agents, employees or
functionaries. Medicine is not the business of the federal government,
and neither is insurance, of any kind. The whole thing needs to be
repealed, with no thought of any replacement bill or any modification.
It must be killed.

Legislation, execution and adjudication of law should
ideally operate to break or weaken any legal linkage between employer
mandated insurance for employees and health care providers. Ideally,
such insurance should not even exist. There is nothing whatsoever that
health insurance does for health care other than to radically increase
the cost and the complexity and the timeliness of the delivery of it,
and the payment for it. Medical care at all levels would be incredibly
cheaper if there were not insurance middlemen between patients and
doctors. Doctors would have major reductions in staff, records,
computers and cost if not for insurance bill coding requirements. These
codes are for insurance bills, and insurance payment, and not for
health care. The insurance industry should not be directing, regulating
or restricting the health care industry or the business of any health
care provider.

Look at all the monstrous government departments and tell me where
they are enumerated in our Constitution. OSHA. EPA. HUD. HHS. The
list is nearly endless. If these functions are truly necessary, then
they belong in the private sector or at lower levels of government; they
have no business even being addressed at the federal level. All they
do is divert and squander our attention, our national treasure, our
perception of our own government, and restrict busness. They strangle
private enterprise with restrictive regulation; that is their real but
hidden purpose. Note that medicine is not one of the government
responsibilities enumerated in the Constitution, and that all that the
CDC every brought us was periodic panics over non-existent pandemics,
and the HIV=AIDS=DEATH government hoax.

Despite Bill O’Reilly’s
pompous assininity, America needs a more developed pure ideology in
favor of America’s founding and constituting documents, as exemplified
by the likes of Sarah Palin and Christine O’Donnell. It is quite
impossible to be “too far to the Right” in support of that pure
ideology. We don’t need the federal government to tell us when to get
on or off the pot, or to interfere with every mundane aspect of our
private lives.

The most productive political arguments between
political positions should most properly be addressing how to get rid of
these monstrous federal departments; whether by chopping them off
suddenly, or destroying them as they were created by the Marxocrats,
which is to say, one little nibble at a time over many decades.
Personally, I favor the chopping block.

Comrade Obama may prove to be America’s best blessing,
if he does not prove to be America’s greatest curse and destroyer. He,
more than anyone else, raised these issues in the American consciousness
and brought about the great Tea Party awakening. If America survives
Obama, she will be stronger than ever.

And now I’m going to go and get myself a big, fat,
juicy grease-burger, all smothered in melted cheese or cheese-product,
with a side of hot, salt-encrusted French fries, and maybe another side
of deep fried spam balls. And I sincerely hope the Obamas don’t like
it.

=====

Sarcastic Acronym Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" it over a link without clicking just to see the simple acronym interpretation. Click a footnote link to see the gory details.)

Brilliant column Mr Biorseth. O'Reilly epitomizes the terms pompous
and condescending. Many times have I had to restrain myself from
assaulting my television when he points that finger at the camera. His
above-it-all persona requires such a stretch in order to equate his weak
criticisms of the right with the left that his act is completely
transparent. Limbaugh has him pegged perfectly. He is Ted Baxter. And
the fact that he keeps running out the same tired rotation of Fox News
contributors in regular segments is a wonder how he keeps dominating his
ratings. Although, considering his competition, I guess not.

Date: Mon Dec 31 07:00:312012From: Vic Biorseth Comment:

Rioman:

Thank you very much; I liked the Ted Baxter comparison so much I included a graphic in your comment.

Regards,

Vic

Monday, December 31, 2012
Converted Page to SBI! Release 3.0 BB 2.0.

Date: Thu Sep 25 2014From: Vic BiorsethComment:

Changes pursuant to changing the website URL
and name from
Thinking Catholic Strategic
Center to
Catholic American Thinker.

Pulled the trigger on the 301 MOVE IT option
June 1, 2014. Working my way through all the webpages. .

I too find Mr. O'Reilly's tv persona to be overbearing. I also agree with much of what you say. In Canada I believe we are in a worse position than the USA.

However, given the proper and good admonition given to those of us who respond I believe it would be good to honour it both ways.

If Mr. O'Reilly is not guilty of the behaviour above you are guilty of calumny. Worse, if he is guilty, you would then be guilty of detraction. "Snobs and pompous asses" is hardly polite.

You have so many good thoughts and reflections I would not like to see people turned off by bits of rhetoric.

By the way, Bill O'Reilly Quite publicly proclaims his Catholicity and has written a rather interesting, obtuse and incomplete book on the Crucifixion of Our Lord.

May God bless you in your endeavour to bring the Faith into the public arena where it really needs to be.

Sincerely, in Christ,

Rev. Robert Bulbrook

Date: Mon Nov 16 2015From: Vic BiorsethComment:

Fr. Bulbrook:

True enough, Father. But when millions are misled by error or falsehood spoken as truth by trusted spokesmen, someone needs to attack the untruth, and I don't see anyone else doing it. Bill O'Reilly very smoothly piled-on and helped destroy the candidacy of Sarah Palin, probably the best opportunity America had for a truly good and decent President in that time frame. He thereby joined in with all the Marxists and other anti-Americans in the Marxocrat Party, and even within the Republicrat Party, to take her out, without looking like he was taking her out.

O'Reilly is no better than the rest of the Marxified Media, and perhaps worse than most, because so many see him as being somehow Conservative. Just like the "Establishment" Republicrats. The FOX network is trusted as a good Conservative network, but it is not. It just makes little Conservative sounds now and then. O'Reilly's open denunciation of ideology itself, undifferentiated, makes the point. In the FOX view, we're all supposed to work with our future enslavers in peace and harmony to "get things done" in a bipartisan way. Cultural suicide.

I will highlight such false directions, and the ones who prompt us in those directions, and if on the final day I have to answer for the sin of detraction in order to do it, I will answer for it. The Lord will judge me as He sees fit.

Regards,

Vic

Language and Tone Statement

Please note the language and tone of this monitored Website. This is not the place to just stack up vulgar
one-liners and crude rejoinders. While you may support, oppose or
introduce any position or argument, submissions must meet our high Roman Catholic and Constitutional American standards of Truth, logical rigor and civil discourse. We will not
participate in merely trading insults, nor will we tolerate participants merely
trading insults. Participants should not be
thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to
defend their arguments when challenged. If you don’t really have a
coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t
embarrass yourself. Nonsensical, obscene, blindly & doggedly anti-Catholic, anti-American, immoral or merely insulting submissions will
not be published here. If you have something serious to contribute to
the conversation, be prepared to back it up, keep it clean, keep it civil, and it will be published. We humbly
apologize to all religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say
these things, but the Hard Left is what it always was, the New Leftist Liberals are what they are, and the Internet is what it is.

"Clickbait" advertising links are not acceptable for posting here.

If you fear intolerant Leftist repercussions, do not use your real name and do not include email or any identifying information. Elitist Culturally Marxist Pure Authoritarians cannot and will not tolerate your freedom of speech or any opposition to their rigid authoritarian, anti-equality, anti-life, anti-liberty, anti-property, hedonistic, anti-Constitution, pro-Marxist, pro-Islam, anti-Catholic, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, anti-male, sexist, pro-homosexual, anti-heterosexual, anti-white, racist, anti-Western, anti-American, Globalist, anti-Nation, blatantly immoral, totally intolerant and bigoted point of view.

This Form cannot be submitted until the missing fields (labelled below in red) have been filled in

ADD COMMENT

Please note that all fields followed by an asterisk must be filled in.

Silence in the face of evil is speaking. "We've had enough of exhortations to be silent!
Cry out with a hundred thousand tongues. I see that the world is rotten
because of silence." Saint Catherine of Siena

“An
error which is not resisted is approved; a truth which is not defended is
suppressed…. He who does not oppose an evident crime is open to the suspicion of
secret complicity.” – Pope Felix III

“Do not forget your purpose and destiny as God's creatures.
What you are in God's sight is what you are and nothing more”—Justice Clarence Thomas

"Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, then, is the sin committed by the person who claims to have a 'right' to persist in evil-in any sin at all-and who thus rejects redemption." Pope Saint John Paul the GreatDOMINUM ET VIVIFICANTEM

"Not to oppose error is to approve it; and not to defend truth is to suppress it, and, indeed, to neglect to confound evil men-when we can do it-is no less a sin than to encourage them." Pope St. Felix III

If a purposeful violator of the Constitution who is a sworn officer of the governemt is not a domestic enemy of America and a traitor, then
there is no such thing, and the Constitution itself is without meaning,
and America has lost its grounding and its very purpose for being. Anti-American-Court

Live Interviews

"All the evils of the world are due to lukewarm Catholics." Pope Pius V

"All the strength of Satan's reign is due to the easygoing weakness of Catholics." Pope St. Pius X

Click the image above topublish your essay or article here,to be included among those below.

Submitted Articles andReprinted Articles

(Note: copyrights on these articles wherever present will supersede the WebSite copyright at the bottom footer of every WebPage)

Still Time To Get It Right. “Once you understand the role of energy in everything, you can begin to appreciate why there's simply nothing more important to get right. Energy is at the root of everything. If you have sufficient energy, anything is possible. But without it, everything grinds to a halt.” Chris Martenson

The Heresy of Chrislam. Those claiming that the “Allah” of Islam’s Qu’ran and Yahweh or God of both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible are one and the same are missing one glaring point: GOD NEVER CONTRADICTS HIMSELF.

Never be lukewarm.Life itself demands passion.He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input. Seek the Truth; find the Way; live the Life; please God, and live forever.

NewsletterCatholic American ThinkerFree E-zine Subscription

Email

You will receive immediate email newsletters with links to new articles as they are published here. Your email is perfectly secure here; we use it only to send you theCatholic American ThinkerNewsletterand absolutely nothing else.

The Absolute Stupidassism PagesWhen
the Emperor Has No Clothes, it shouldn't take a little child to point
that out to everyone else. We have a real societal problem when large
numbers of grown, educated adults do not automatically recognize a
clearly stupid argument, position or proposition on the very first
encounter.

"We belong to the Church militant; and She is militant because on earth the powers of darkness are ever restless to encompass Her destruction. Not only in the far-off centuries of the early Church, but down through the ages and in this our day, the enemies of God and Christian civilization make bold to attack the Creator’s supreme dominion and sacrosanct human rights.”--Pope Pius XII

"It is not lawful to take the things of others to give to the poor. It is a sin worthy of punishment, not an act deserving a reward, to give away what belongs to others."--St. Francis of Assisi

Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance
may deride it, but in the end, there it is.—Winston
Churchill

The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who
deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.—Ayn Rand

Atheist Genesis:

In the beginning there was nothing, and nothing happened to nothing.
And then nothing accidentally exploded and created everything.
And then some bits of everything accidentally encountered other bits of everything and formed some new kinds of everything.
And then some bits of everything accidentally arranged themselves into self-replicating bits of everything.
And then some self-replicating bits of everything accidentally arranged themselves into dinosaurs.
See?

“ … for I have sworn upon
the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind
of man.” wrote Thomas Jefferson in a letter to Dr. Benjamin Rush in
the year of our Lord 1800. The context
involved resistance to any form of Christianity or Deism legally imposing
itself throughout the USA. We must wonder what he might say
about our current government's forced imposition of strict secularism – i.e.,
anti-theism – throughout the USA. I submit that legally enforced secularism of society, like theocracy, like Marxism,
and like Islam, is, precisely, a form of tyranny over the mind of man.Nothing good can come from the religious cleansing of Judaeo-Christian society. Government imposed secularism is just another form of theocracy.