Brother testifies for defense in Afghan massacre

Brother testifies for defense in Afghan massacre

In this courtroom sketch, Haji Mohammad Naim testifies Tuesday in a courtroom at Joint Base Lewis-McChord south of Seattle. (AP Photo/Peter Millett)

Brother testifies for defense in Afghan massacre

In this courtroom sketch, Staff Sgt. Robert Bales, foreground, is seated in a courtroom at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash. on Tuesday during a sentencing hearing in the slayings of 16 civilians killed. (AP Photo/Peter Millett)

By GENE JOHNSON THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

JOINT BASE LEWIS-MCCHORD, Wash. — A brother of the U.S. soldier who slaughtered 16 Afghan civilians last year began making the case Wednesday for why he should one day be eligible for parole, portraying him as a patriotic American and indulgent father who let his son put ranch dressing on chocolate chip pancakes.

“There”;s no better father that I”;ve seen,” William Bales said of his younger brother, Staff Sgt. Robert Bales. “If you brought the kids in here today, they”;d run right to him.”

Sgt. Bales, 39, pleaded guilty in June in a deal to avoid the death penalty, acknowledging that he killed 16 people, mostly women and children, during unsanctioned, solo, pre-dawn raids on two villages March 11, 2012. A jury is deciding whether he should be sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole, or without it.

The picture painted by the first defense witness, William Bales, 55, severely contradicted that portrayed by the soldier”;s admissions as well as by the testimony of nine Afghan villagers, including victims and their relatives, about the horror Bales wrought.

Defense attorneys hope the contrast will convince jurors that Bales simply snapped after four combat deployments and deserves leniency.

William Bales repeatedly referred to his sibling - once the captain of his high school football team and class president in Norwood, Ohio, where they grew up - as “my baby brother” and “Bobby.”

He described how as a teenager his brother cared for a developmentally disabled neighborhood boy, assisting him with basic life functions. The boy”;s father also testified how helpful Bales was.

“I don”;t know too many 16-, 17-year-old boys who could do that,” William Bales said.

He also described how the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, changed “good-time Bobby” and how he soon thereafter enlisted in the Army.

Prosecutors noted, however, that Bales was also facing a fraud lawsuit when he enlisted. An arbitrator eventually imposed a $1.5 million judgment against Bales and his former stockbroking company.

One of Bale”;s lawyers, John Henry Browne, said after court Wednesday that his client will speak to the jury at the end of the case, and he will offer an apology for his crimes.

On Tuesday afternoon and Wednesday morning, nine Afghan villagers who traveled about 7,000 miles to testify at the hearing in traditional garb spoke of their lives since the attacks.

Haji Mohammad Wazir lost 11 family members, including his mother, wife and six of his seven children. He told the six-member jury that the attacks destroyed what had been a happy life. He was in another village with his youngest son, now 5-year-old Habib Shah, during the attack.

“If someone loses one child, you can imagine how devastated their life would be,” said Wazir, who received $550,000 in condolence payments from the U.S. government, out of $980,000 paid in all. His son, now 5, “misses everyone. He hasn”;t forgotten any of them.”

“I”;ve gone through very hard times,” he added. “If anybody speaks to me about the incident … I feel the same, like it”;s happening right now.”

Wazir and a cousin, Khamal Adin, didn”;t get to say everything they wanted to in court. Each asked for permission to speak after the prosecutors”; questions were finished, but the judge said it wasn”;t allowed.

On Tuesday, a farmer who was shot in the neck cursed Bales before pleading with the prosecutor to ask him no more questions.

“This bastard stood right in front of me!” the farmer, Haji Mohammad Naim, testified, through an interpreter. “I wanted to ask him, `What did I do? What have I done to you?”; … and he shot me!”

Browne said Wednesday that on his way out of the courtroom, Naim used an even angrier quote directed at Bales about exacting revenge upon his mother.

Bales”; attorneys, who have said the soldier suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder, didn”;t cross-examine any of the Afghan witnesses.

Two military doctors testified Wednesday, describing the treatment of Bales”; victims, including a young girl who had been shot in the head and spent three months undergoing surgeries and rehabilitation at a naval hospital in San Diego, relearning how to walk.

Bales, a father of two from Lake Tapps, Wash., was serving his fourth combat deployment when he left the outpost at Camp Belambay in the pre-dawn darkness. He first attacked one village, returning to Belambay only when he realized he was low on ammunition, said prosecutor Lt. Col. Jay Morse.

Bales then left to attack another village.

The massacre prompted such angry protests that the U.S. temporarily halted combat operations, and it was three weeks before Army investigators could reach the crime scene.

A former brigade commander in Afghanistan, Col. Todd Wood, told the jury about arriving at Belambay the morning of the attack to find an angry crowd outside, with four makeshift trucks carrying 13 of the bodies.

At the time of the killings, Bales had been under heavy personal, professional and financial stress, Morse said. He had complained to other soldiers that his wife was fat and unattractive and said he”;d divorce her except that her father had money. He had stopped paying the mortgage on one of his houses and he was upset that he had not been promoted.

During his plea hearing in June, Bales couldn”;t explain to a judge why he committed the killings. “There”;s not a good reason in this world for why I did the horrible things I did,” he said.

If he is sentenced to life with the possibility of parole, Bales would be eligible in 20 years, but there”;s no guarantee he would receive it. He will receive life with parole unless at least five of the six jurors say otherwise.

Comment section guidelines

The below comment section contains thoughts and opinions from users that in no way represent the views of the Las Vegas Review-Journal or GateHouse Media. This public platform is intended to provide a forum for users of reviewjournal.com to share ideas, express thoughtful opinions and carry the conversation beyond the article. Users must follow the guidelines under our Commenting Policy and are encouraged to use the moderation tools to help maintain civility and keep discussions on topic.