"Terrorism could be the use or threat of violence in pursuit of ideological gain, but in that sense the police are terrorists. And what about the unauthorized use of force? But who authorizes force and under what conditions?"
-- Professor N. Ann Davis

She sees the police as terrorists too? What does she think of the military? Does she equate American soldiers as terrorists? And what about the unauthorized use of force. That is what those that commit arson are really doing. But she seems to advocate that use of force from the likes of Rodney Coronado and others like him.

You would think that a professor would be able to see the difference in the police and terrorist. Perhaps she does not know the definition of terrorism.

Terrorism - The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or group against people or property with the intent of intimidation or coercion often for ideological or political reasons...

Of course, we all know they do, being highly educated professors. The problem is that either they refuse to accept the truth or they do not have the courage to accept the truth because of ideological or political reasons. The inability to condemn terrorism is very consistent with those having strong Anarchist and Marxist ideals.

"I look at terrorism as an act against other people 9/11-style or the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand prior to World War I. This is more political vandalism. 'Eco-terrorism' has been co-opted into the same terrorism we face in 9/11."

Is Professor Davis, with her expertise in "Ethics" and "Morality", equating Terrorism to mere vandalism? What does she think the purpose of Terrorism is? Is this woman is really a teacher?