Don't worry about it. I figured it would be kinda strange that they
wouldn't be there; ah well. It served as a nice intro to C# :P
Also, helped me kill a couple of spare minutes I had...
Alas, the reason I chose those classes was because I don't know that much
about C#. But still, would be nice to see my name up in lights (so to
speak), so I'll poke around and see if I can find any classes/methods that
don't look too hard. ^_^
-- Daniel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Duncan Mak" <duncan@ximian.com>
To: "Daniel Keep" <shortcircuitfky@hotmail.com>
Cc: <mono-list@ximian.com>; "Miguel de Icaza" <miguel@ximian.com>
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Implementation of *Attribute Classes
forMicrosoft.VisualBasic
> On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 10:17, Daniel Keep wrote:
> > I got really bored late a night, and noticed all those missing
*Attribute
> > classes under the Microsoft.VisualBasic assembly, so I went and did
them.
> > Not spectacularly difficult or impressive, but I felt like doing
something
> > :P
>> Oh, one more thing I forgot to mention.
>> I think the Attributes are not showing up possibly because of some
> mis-compilation (i.e. we forgot to include them in the
> Microsoft.VisualBasic build), but it could also be a CorCompare (the
> program we run to compare assembly) bug. If it is the latter, I think
> Gonzalo is working fixing it; if it's the a problem with not including
> the right files, it'll be nice to fix the makefiles/source listing to
> fix this problem.
>> Duncan.
>