Follow by Email

Investing In Bitcoin - Business Insider

It is my view that any cashless society is for the purpose of the bankers controlling all digital dollars. It is dangerous and unamerican. I don't agree with Ron Paul on much, but I totally agree with him on this, bitcoin can't put cash in your pocket.

So I posted this response to Henry in the comment section:

But there are many places cash transactions are necessary. We all know the bankers want a cashless society so they can control all the money. As bad as Cyprus was, it would have been a whole lot worse if you couldn't pull any cash out. Or did you forget that. Did you not hear that Bernanke said it was unlikely Cyprus would happen here, which means it could happen here? Notice he didn't say it could not happen here?

But we learned from Ellen Brown that the money you put in your bank is not yours. Did you know it is a loan to the bank and technically belongs to the bank and not you?

Does that reassure you? :)

Anyway, I think it is not the American way to have your money forced on loan to a bank. The real question is whether bitcoin is deposited in a bank or if it is separate from a bank and free from the powers of confiscation that banks have over dollars.

It would only be better than dollars if it were free from confiscation and I don't know how that would be certain.

Get link

Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Google+

Email

Other Apps

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Join Talkmarkets for Financial Information. It is free! https://goo.gl/QZff5YI have written a lot of vetted articles that are exclusive** to Talkmarkets. Sorting a portion of them by subject will give the reader an opportunity to make sense of it all. I am adding a glossary of terms at the bottom of this page.For readers interested in economic subjects of the day, these top 30 themes are my efforts to make understanding economics easier:I have pinned the following article to the top because it is an insight into my personal life, as well as a commentary on isms. Capitalism is still the greatest system for creating wealth. However, it is often mixed, and mixturism is a factor in its success or failure:

There is further study in the articles I have cited for you at the end of this article. People must, must understand that Donald Trump is a divider of races and ethnicity, because at heart he is a fascist. Fascism seeks the purity of the races. Fascism is the opposite of what America stands for. Keep in mind that Donald Trump is highly influenced by Anarcho Capitalist, Murray Rothbard. This is an email I sent to an author online. It is slightly muddled, but overall quite accurate in its assessment of Libertarian Murray Rothbard:

Hi Steve,
I agree with your article on Rothbard, mostly. However, as a British court ruled, Zionism is not the essence of what it means to be Jewish. Therefore, I hate antiSemitism, and embrace antiZionism. I have both religious and non religious reasons for taking this stand. And the court absolves me of racism. After all my natural father was Jewish. And more and more Jews hate Zionism. And Zionism is quite multiracial at this point.
So, Trump actually is …

John Mauldin published an article regarding the economics of Donald Trump. I share many of his views. I think the article deserves to be discussed further.

It isn't as if John Mauldin is happy with the continual drive toward negative yields and the new normal. I believe he is like many, willing to fight for higher interest rates within reason and within the economic boundaries that exist. He is on board with the Fed, unlike other central banks, and is willing to risk recession to avoid negative rates:

Meanwhile, the Fed is in the middle of a long-overdue policy turn. There’s still a risk that they will find they started tightening just in time for a recession, which is also long overdue. I was convinced last summer that they would push rates negative in that scenario. Negative rates could yet happen, but I think they wi…