It’s no surprise that the bill did well in the Senate. It enjoys the support both of business lobbyists and of the Democratic party’s key constituencies. Things get harder now because in the Republican-controlled House, immigration skeptics have more power. It’s not clear whether the speaker, the Republicans’ John Boehner, can politically afford to let a bill that most Republicans oppose pass largely with votes from the Democratic minority.

Some, like Business Insider’s Josh Barro, think it could happen, because many Republicans in fact support the bill, though they can’t be seen to vote for it:

… For many, many House Republicans, the ideal situation is for a reform bill to pass over their objections. Business interests will get the bill they want, Democrats will be deprived of a powerful talking point with Hispanic voters, and individual house members will be able to tell conservative primary voters that they tried to “stop amnesty.” Win, win, win.

Others, like TPM’s Brian Beutler, aren’t so sure that the bill will make it through the complex procedural wringer that would give Republicans the political cover they need to let the bill pass. Rather than taking up the Senate bill, Boehner says the House will write its own version. It would probably lose Democratic support along the way and require negotiations with the Senate to agree on a final product. And a final vote could still require Boehner to bring a bill to the floor that only a minority of his party will vote for. Plus, all the delay could drag negotiations into the fall, when legislators will once again be occupied with the debate about lifting the debt ceiling. For the bill to succeed, in other words, a lot needs to go right.

One creative idea to streamline the process is a “discharge position,” a procedural loophole that advocates of immigration reform may pursue, and which would allow 218 like-minded members to bring a bill directly to a vote.

Here’s a reminder of the last time everyone thought that immigration reform was making good progress:

Is it rude to point out that immigration reform also passed in the Senate in 2006 before dying in the House?— Ryan Lizza (@RyanLizza) June 27, 2013