I have just read the
entire reverse string below, and in response to your asking me for what I think,
it is as follows:

The approach taken by
J.A.I.L. is that we are designed to force the judges on the hotseat of
personal liability as they try defending themselves before a citizens
Grand Jury wherein they argue admiralty law, bankruptcy, etc, as the reason for
not upholding their oaths of office to defend the Constitution against all
enemies, foreign and domestic.

By judges so arguing
these defenses, they will have to admit that they did violated the
Constitution, and that they did it willfully, qualifying them for civil
liability. Furthermore, they also subject themselves to be thrown in
prison for years on perjury charges.

Such arguments will open
the eyes of the public greatly, as these judges' arguments become public
record, and judge after judge goes to prison. J.A.I.L. will turn the entire
system upside down, or so it will appear, inasmuch as it is now entirely upside
down, to wit, "Injustice" equals "Justice."

We need to give up
excuses for the judges doing what they do, and make them answer to us! Nothing
is availed by our dancing to their tune. Let's make them dance to ours - willful
violations of the Constitution!

The focus of J.A.I.L.
is the judiciary-- not the lawyers or Bar. And in fact, we find that the
judiciary is the ROOT of the problem-- not a branch. The judiciary is the
final backstop of all matters. They have the final say on anything brought
for redress of grievances. The problem is that we don't get redress in our
courts because of corrupt judges who are not accountable for their actions.
The judges disregard their duty. Regardless of how corrupt the lawyers are,
the judiciary has the responsibility of putting that corruption to an end as
a matter of law. However, with a corrupt judiciary, that can't be done, as
they are part of the problem and not the solution.

It is our judiciary
that sits in judgment over any grievance, including corrupt lawyers or the
corrupt Bar Association, brought to court for redress. Therefore, it's the
judiciary that must be held accountable to the People, which is what the
J.A.I.L. process will provide. I believe what you are asking for is beyond
the scope of J.A.I.L.

I have forwarded this
to Ron's computer for his information. Thank you for writing.

I do not know who John is. I understand that you
are working to remove the unlawful privately owned British
Accreditation Regency 'legal system' from the law courts of your country.
The same people that have enslaved you enslave us as well, the major
difference being that, unlike you, we never have been a free people. At
least you people had about three weeks of real freedom in your history,
before the legal system got you back into the trap.

Though I admire the approach you take, it is not
practical here in Canada as our entire government is far too corrupt.
What we are concentrating on is preparing cases
to bring the Inns of Temple Court, the private clubs that own the 'legal
system franchise' that is imposed on us, to the LAW COURTS at
Westminster, where they are at their absolute peril. In the 'legal gaming
courts' here in Canada, all we can do is play the part of the fish while
the Justice Department, which owns Revenue Canada, play at shooting fish
in a barrel. It does not matter what the case is in Canada, the only sure
winner is the court system that collect fees from both parties. I have
Hansard notes from the House of Lords dating back to when Canada was
'patriating' it's Constitution in 1982, where they are laughing at our
gullibility, but conceding that the reason we are so stupid is because our
fathers were also deceived before us and as a consequence have no idea
what the true nature of the deceit is.

Since this unlawful 'legal system' has been
imposed in all countries that are "Constitutional Monarchies" (a serious
contradiction of terms) we are trying to motivate people in Scotland,
Ireland, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand to do the same. It would
be wonderful if a group of Americans would also launch a class action suit
against the people in Britain that own this private legal system
franchise, in their own Law Courts, that have imposed this deception
in our various countries. They are guilty of crimes against humanity and
need to be brought to Justice.

'Legal' and 'Lawful' are two different things. In
the distinction between the two, lie the basis of this great deceit. I no
longer look for definitions of anything anywhere except in
Black's Law Dictionary. Please check my definitions for
yourself. Lawful contemplates the spirit of the law. It is the
substance of our law system. It is predicated upon the morals and ethics
of the state (the people) who live in a given geographical area. Legal
simply means it is written down someplace. 'Legal' means the letter of the
Law. It is quite possible for something to be 'legal' and totally
UNLAWFUL. All of our law courts in North America have been overthrown
and replaced with a legal court system. Lawyers are all members of the
'British Accreditation Regency'. In other words, they have sworn
allegiance to a foreign power. This is why
lawyers only ever talk about what is legal and not what is
lawful.

Lawyers are given the British Title of 'Esquire'.
An squire is a shield bearer. British Titles are given out for service to
the British Crown. (The British Crown by the way, is not the Monarch,
but a legislative body of bankers and lawyers from Fleet Street where
these Inns of Temple Court exist.) Ever wonder what service G.H.W. Bush or
Mayor Giuliani rendered to the British Crown to become Knights of the
British Empire? Do you know how many people holding top positions in your
own government are Knights of the British Empire? Does it not bother you
people that those you have elected to authority in your country have sworn
allegiance to a foreign power? Isn't that treason? It is time we ripped
the disgusting rag from the eyes of Justice so she can see to wield her
divine sword of Justice against these criminals.

I really like the fact that you people are
working so hard to exacerbate the plans of these global dominators, but it
would sure be nice if you were chopping at the roots of the problem rather
than just trimming all the branches. If you are interested in what it is
that I am saying, I can send you copies of my book; "Freedom! Canada" and
a number of brochures, which explains much of how the British
have deceived us here in Canada. I do not have my book online anymore as,
once again, my web site has been closed. I keep losing service providers
for "spamming", even though all I do is send political messages to elected
officials and government employees.

Wishing you all the best, my American cousins.
Keep your chins up and fight the good fight. I have some links at http://142.179.147.127/links.asp
that you may be interested in as well. Since I have had numerous hotmail
email accounts closed as well, my number is 403-228-2798. Please contact
me there if my I lose my ISP connection again or if they
close this hotmail account.

Cheers, Jim

P.S. Do you know what the lawful definition of
Free is? Look in Black's Law Dictionary...

Free: Not subject to the legal constraints of
another. (Isn't that interesting.)

Other definitions you should look at; State (the
people in a given geographical area. We the people, are the state,
not the government.) License (a permit to do something that would
otherwise be illegal. It is illegal for you to own your own car or to
drive it on the highway without getting a license from the British Crown?)
Constitution (the body of law, written by the people, for regulating the
government. So why are our governments playing with our Constitutions? Why
are the foxes writing the rules for the hen house?)

Free people are self governing. We do not elect
governments to govern us. We elect governments to govern the civil
service. Perhaps if we made our politicians wear janitor uniforms, they
would understand their place in society and would understand that we are
electing EMPLOYEES, NOT LEADERS. More likely though, they already
understand this and it is WE THE PEOPLE that need to come to this
realization.

"The nation that wishes to remain IGNORANT and
FREE, wishes for what never was, and never will be."

Barb tells me
that she has placed you in touch with John there in Canada, and has
added you to her computer. I have now added you to my computer as well,
so you are now an official Canada JAILer.

One of the
projects setting on the stove is coming up with a written proposed
initiative or legislation for Canada. I don't know if Canada has an
initiative process, but in any case, we need to compile a
proposal.

Please get
together with John and design a proposal that is near consistent
with the California Initiative, yet practical to Canada. Attached is a
copy of the California Initiative for you two to work with. After you
come up with your draft, please contact me with it. Thanks. I will be
looking forward to seeing what you come up with.