5 Reasons Women Should Be Banned From Working As Police Officers

John Carver is a four year ROK veteran with over fifty articles of SJW-triggering truth bombs on archive. You can follow him on Twitter if you are so inclined.

Here at Return of Kings, we aren’t exactly the biggest fans of the great flood of women entering the workforce. Every female who takes a relatively well-paid full-time job is accordingly denying another man a reliable income in an era where “jobs for all” is long gone, and yet undeniable truths of the sexual marketplace have not (and will not) ever change.

A man is always going to be willing to date, marry, and have a family with a reasonably attractive woman who is by every definition “unemployed” and almost penniless, but a reasonably attractive woman (and therefore a woman with options) will not date, marry, and have a family with an unemployed or broke man.

Oh she’s so “empowered” and “badass”!

Nonetheless, if women must be in the workforce for the sake of requiring dual incomes, the least they can do is enter a profession where they are just as fully capable as men in performance standards, and where they are close to guaranteed to be coming home safely to their boyfriend, husband, and/or children every night.

Being a police officer is not one of those professions. Now for the sake of on-the-job competency, the safety of the public, and offering a greater number of men a (pun intended) shot at employment, this article will elaborate on five reasons why women all over the world should be banned from being cops.

In the preceding video, we can see why society is dependent upon capable officers who are the total opposite of this “badass” lady cop. That is, those who can physically hold their own (or for at least awhile until a taser or something can be brandished!) against the most commonly encountered wastes of oxygen and taxpayer dimes in any given country.

In the mean urban streets of the United States of America, that waste of oxygen is most likely going to be black, male, young, 6 feet tall, at least 180 pounds, brimming with testosterone and “the ‘tude” (attitude), and packing a big pounds-per-square-inch (P.S.I.) punch or shove. 99% of women in the United States just can’t handle that.

Meanwhile, while the comparatively far more peaceful New Zealand isn’t particularly well known for having the most sensible women, they at least have the sense to send out a police officer who has the strength and physique to get the job done for the task at hand. Well done Kiwis, I guess that rugby culture comes in handy sometimes (for the men).

2. They Are Lazy, Slow, And Incompetent

There is a reason why you don’t see many women in comparatively highly paid professions like petroleum engineering, Alaskan crab fishing, or mining. It’s because most women, those who are even just slightly in touch with their natural feminine imperative, are not at all attracted to outdoorsy and physically intensive jobs with no guarantee of perfect weather.

They are naturally inclined to seek out temperature-regulated and comfortable-seating office jobs where gossip, Instagram, and Facebook can occupy half of the “work day” in their mostly vanity (ie. non-essential) employment industry. Accordingly, this natural inclination for inherently lazy and slow-paced work means that being a police officer is not a suitable working environment for women either.

In an absolutely embarrassing video which was captured in New York City, not one but two female police officers are utterly incapable of bringing down a lone black male suspect, all while appearing to be putting in a snails effort to keep pace or chase. The man capturing the video finds this gross incompetence absolutely hysterical. Meanwhile (after we are done laughing too), all we can do is make the face palm gesture.

3. They Are Too Soft And Easily Scared

(1:18) “Obviously he’s a violent hooligan. He’s not that tough though. This refugee, a normal Joe in terms of strength, overpowered the female cops. And it goes to show you just how low the Swedish feminist standards are when they hire police officers.”

A video of not one, not two, but three female Swedish police officers, failing to subdue a single medium-build hooligan, made the rounds around the world and (for awhile) turned the leftist fantasy land into a laughingstock. While seemingly implausible, it actually makes perfect sense.

Women by nature are far more easily frightened and repulsed in the face of danger (hence you see all three quote-on-quote “police officers” backing away from the suspect after he lands a hard punch or two) and they are often too soft to put up any sustained resistance.

Raising young children is a profession which best utilizes a woman’s softer, delicate, and more nurturing strengths. The OPPOSITE is trying to subdue hostile adult men from an equally hostile culture.

4. They Are Too Dependent On Male Officers

A female cops radio dispatcher might as well just be called their “white knight” call box. They are by and large, for any length of time, utterly incapable of doing their job properly without male assistance.

Smaller, weaker, slower, and often just plain lazy, they have to phone in an instant dose of testosterone (competent male cops) in order to see to the end even the most asinine of iffy situations. Like a defiant urban “dindu nuffin” who is not going to put up with getting a citation for riding his bike on the sidewalk.

By proxy, this makes female police officers a huge waste on police resources and their overall efficiency. For every far more capable male officer who has to assist an affirmative-action (female) hire, that is one more male officer who is temporarily taken out of availability in case a far more serious crime actually needs attention.

5. Lives Depend Upon Fully Capable Police Officers – Which Women Are Not

The preceding clip from the 1976 film “The Enforcer” (part of the ‘Dirty Harry’ canon) accurately portrays just what can go wrong when feminist and affirmative action hiring practices infect police departments. An unimposing female law enforcement officer with no field experience is being considered for the role of an Inspector, while male officers with 10 or 15 years of real experience are clearly being passed up on the opportunity.

When completely unsuitable women (due to physical weakness, softness, incompetency, too easily scared, lack of experience, etc) are considered for selection for all the wrong reasons (gender quotas & feminist fapping), they will inevitably put the lives of the public and their colleagues at risk.

The sheriffs deputy who was easily overpowered and beaten into a coma by Brian Nichols in the Fulton County Courthouse in Atlanta, Georgia in 2005. The convict then took her gun and escaped custody, leading to four murders / innocent deaths before his eventual recapture. All of those deaths could have been avoided if a larger, stronger, and more capable MALE officer was assigned to watch over the large and imposing suspect.

Being a beat cop is serious business. It is not just some profession where you go “durrrrrpppp, I need a job!” just because you happened to be unemployed and you heard the department was looking for some new street meat.

If you are a heterosexual white male (the most browbeaten and hated creature in the modern United States), you need to be prepared to have everything you do completely filmed, scrutinized, and dissected by the “minorities” (who make up 50% or more of the population in many large cities) you will be dealing with everyday.

As for women, I’m sorry. 99% of you just don’t have what it takes to deal with the hyper-masculine dregs of society. The closest societies in which being a female cop could actually work are places like Japan, Korea, Taiwan, or Iceland. Even then, women are still second-rate choices.

Conclusion – Female Cops Should Be Bedroom Sex Fantasies For Men Or Lesbians ONLY

She can arrest me, strip me down, and “brutalize” me anytime

Considering how much weaker, slower, softer, lazier, incompetent, scared, and dependent female police officers are compared to men in the same profession, it is a living joke as to why they are even hired in the first place. Since female police officers are living jokes, then the mere idea of female police officers must also be treated as a joke.

Most men’s idea of a fun and joke filled night would include a joyful lovemaking session, which was preceded by our ladies wearing a sexy female “cop” outfit for a bit of whimsical spice. NOT receiving a phone call from the intensive-care unit informing us that our never-should-have-been-a-real-cop significant other is bleeding to death through her bullet-riddled police uniform.

Again I will reiterate. For the sake of on-the-job competency in an essential service, and offering far more capable men a chance at steady employment (and therefore a new potential suitor in an era of record low birth rates), women must be banned from becoming police officers. A complete and permanent hiring freeze on women should go into effect in all countries starting immediately.

All strong points. Not long ago, there were minimum physical standards for police employment. Like, you had to be above a certain height and weight, such that you could engage in physical combat (and win) when necessary. These days half the police forces are women and midgets.

All of the author’s points add up to the fact that female cops are less able to control situations and are more likely to use Tasers and firearms when a male cop would not consider it necessary.

What about that chick from Police Academy? That Amazonian blonde who, I may observe, would have been welcome to sit on my cock and bounce up and down until one or the both of us died of dehydration. What about her?

#6 They get emotionally triggered easily.
#7 Girls that go into such fields will have a feminist mindset and will not treat people fairly under the law.
#8 They have a duty at home that they are neglecting.
#9 They are making western society a laughing stock.
#10 They have a poor sense of space and time.
#11 They lack cold logic.

#8 is a big deal. A female cop who has children at home? Fuck that. You’re gonna leave your kids without a mom because some asshole criminal decides to shoot you rather than go back to jail for the 17th time?

This type of shit really pisses me off. The fucking all-star feminist-cop who thinks going out and risking her life everyday is somehow setting a positive example for her children… What in the actual fuck!

I don’t have anything against female cops/soldiers as LONG as they’re competent. And yes, they’re competent women too (who doesn’t scream all the time: we’re better than men but who actually prove themselves to be good cops), I do believe in competence of SOME women. My aunt was a cop (she’s an officer, now retired, but she was very, very good at her job, she’s still loved/respected by all her ex-colleagues), she’s very smart, has a lot of cold blood, not lazy but hardworking and not a femininazi who claimed to be better than men (she WORKED HARD to became what she was) and she was also married with a man who had a carrier in army (my uncle). They have 2 children and my aunt proved herself to be both a good cop and a good mother. Kudos to her.

That’s my point. We should keep all the exceptions (ONLY competent female cops/soldiers and fire the incompetent ones- also the few incompetent men, because there are incompetent men too). Keep few good women and is fair for everyone (and we should also make women go through some difficult tests in order to prove their competence; if they’re competent, they’re free to work where they want; if they’re not, fuck them- replace them with competent men)

When I was younger, I would have agreed with you. As I have come to see how workplace environments work, the reality of women in a masculine endeavor… it’s just not worth it in the long run. What little good the few exceptions to the rule might do is heavily outweighed by the change in dynamics among the men, all the other factors involved.

Agreed, I am in engineering (heavily male dominated). I have noticed that office conversations are much longer when there are women around, less centered on friendly competition, and more about whining about touchy – feely subjects. Production goes down.

Everyone with their opinion, ok? I don’t want to contradict anyone here so I’ll stop here and continue to keep my opinion on this subject. I love to see women in workplace, especially pretty ones. And if they’re competent and hardworking too then everything is better. I’m all for everyone should work, in order to gain money for their families. I actually dislike people who prefer to stay home and be dependent to others whole they don’t produce anything and they don’t feed their family. I’m not into traditional family when it comes to work (both husband and wife SHOULD work to feed their family, this is how I see things).

From your point of view, but I was educated into thinking like this. Once, my father yelled at my mother because she couldn’t find a new job (after she lost the previous one because the shop where she was working went bankrupt). She was almost forced to find another job because my father kept telling her to work and bring money to our family. My father educated me to never accept to have a wife without job, because he strong believes that no woman should live on my money waiting for me to feed both (he called the jobless women bitches and gold diggers). He said that a perfect wife should: work to bring money to her family, rise good children and respect her husband. My father is a role model to me and I will always listen to what he taught me. Anyway, thanks for your advises, you’re a wise man yourself.

I agree with the firemen (this is a job which is hard and dangerous even for most men). But I’m sure that there are no such thing as women firemen, I never heard of a women fireman before, honestly (I hard about women in administrative and clerical jobs but no firemen themselves. At least not in my country).

The problem is the PC push to take the one or two competent women and use them as the excuse to push in a bunch of incompetents.
Instead of insisting the standards be maintained, they use the competent women who meet the standards as an excuse to lower them. It’s a contradiction but I’ve seen it in the military. Hey a woman can do this so that means the standards are too high since you should be able to use the average woman in the role.
Knew a couple of competent women pilots, knew a lot more who’d have issues being on the flight schedule for various ‘female’ things…

If you say that, but I believe that a woman who purposefully seeks out a masculine life is broken because that’s how it is.
Great, that she somehow managed to be a good mother but her not being driven by whatever impulses into a male field would have made her an even better mother.

I don’t want to be derogatory here about your relatives but when a mother chooses to make her children her main occupation then that is better than one who doesn’t as a cold fact.

1 year. Conscription in Romania ended in 2006 (Romania is also member of NATO), everything is based on voluntary service now. My father convinced me to go voluntary, telling me that Army makes me a real man. I listened him but I didn’t want an Army career.

I love how in the first video the chick grunts like she’s pushing a four-plate squat as she gets out of her squad car, then proceeds to put away her pink iPhone where she was more than likely texting and driving.

Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !au157d:
On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
!au157:
➽➽
➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash447GroupMind/Pay$97/Hour… ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!au157..,…

Probably overweight by at least 40 pounds, that would account for the fact that just getting out of her squad car seemed to be a major undertaking (I noted that too). Totally unready to confront the suspect when he was suddenly upon her because she was screwing around with her phone.

Great article, though sadly in saner times it would be filed under common sense. Women shouldn’t work at all, unless it’s to nurse. Or perhaps an eye-candy job like receptionist or waitress (but even then it’s not advisable because of all the male attention lavished on them). They should just live with their fathers until they’re married off to a suitable husband.

I’m going to go against the grain here and say that women should be cops, just in a very limited way far different from how they are used now. Women should be used in ways that play to their strengths just as should men. So when you need high empathy and emotional intelligence – for example, negotiations with someone who is emotionally triggered and barricaded with hostages – a female may not be a bad idea. But beat cop work? Yeah, fuck that unless she is a tag-along to TWO males, and her only task, should the chick approach to problem solving fail, is to call for backup on the radio.

I wonder how many women will inevitably quote the Kurdish women as basis of why women should be allowed to carry weapons.
I would say this: Kurdish women do fight ISIS, and they’ve earned respect, but the U don’t do it for muh feminism or to be badasses. They do it for survival. I’ll elaborate this way: As Kurds as of now don’t have their own state/states, they are at the mercy of others, be it ISIS, the Assad regime, the old Saddam regime, Turkey, Iran, etc. Which means the threat of annihilation is always looming. So this is where the women come in. Because inevitably the men will fight and some will die, the women have to step in. Why? In my view (and I really hope feminists are reading this), they are defending not just their culture and race, but oddly enough, the Patriarchy. You see, if the men do get exterminated, the women still have to watch out for their kids. Because there’s always the possibility that their enemies will kill the male children and take the female children as sex slaves/concubines, not to mention the adult women themselves. So in a way, these women are actually preserving their own race by protecting themselves and their children. And quite frankly, and seeing how feminine and pleasant the Kurdish women look even in fatigues, if it was for them, they would trade their AK47s for pots and pans and stay home to look after their husbands and children.

Depends. I don’t know much about the PKK Kurds in Turkey or the Iranian Kurds, but the Syrian Kurds in the SDF do practice some sort of socialism while the Peshmerga Iraqi Kurds have a tribal system which I think is similar to that of the Arabs.
In all fairness, if the Syrian Kurds do practice a sort of socialism, it’s because of four points that I theorize are necessary if socialism is to work as a concept: a homogeneous population based on a combo of religion or race, a source of wealth, a small manageable population, and a situation of distress, i.e., war or a hostile environment.

interesting comment. I don’t know enough about the situation there to really respond, but it’s certainly worth looking at carefully. I agree that the common cause and common threat must be what grounds their functioning as tribal / national groups. You remove that and the cohesion, not to mention the socialism would go out the window. ISIS is pretty useful in that sense of providing a common enemy

I would also add that the Kurdish interpretation of Marxism probably differs significantly from ours in North America. Our is mostly about wealth redistribution, theirs is mostly about social organization that’s why it works for them. Also the leftists that pollute American politics are mostly socialists or Leninist. The Kurdish Marxists share about as much in common with the North American left wing ideologically as Trotsky did with Stalin.

I actually find it quite an interesting issue, and will need to read up on it. I do think the ‘national’ / tribal character of the kurds helps with cohesion, and makes other distinctions perhaps less ‘urgent’. Wikipedia seems to indicate the PKK was marxist leninist. I agree that they are not well suited to internationalist trotskyism, on account of the tribal aspect of their socialism. I’m not speaking from a position of knowledge though

That makes sense. I think there are a lot of freedom movements that have become some variety of marxist because that was the ‘liberation theology’ available to them, but which they have to some extent grown out of. As i say I don’t know much about the kurds but the tribal, nationalist aspect of the kurdish freedom struggle does seem to be what binds them

I’m not aware of any army, engaged in serious conflict, that has used women by choice for longer than the time required to realize it was idiotic. I am, however, aware of several times where women were used out of absolute necessity for reasons you mention. It’s not a you-go-grrrrrl! situation, it’s an “all-hands-on-deck-or-we’re-fucked” situation.

It’s not exactly similar, but we can look for comparison the Rosie the Riveter type of women that took over for men during WWII. Given merit where merit is due, they did their part in building the Arsenal of Democracy. After all, as much bravery as the Greatest Generation had, it not have been that useful without good logistics. Of course, once the war was over, back to the kitchen and to be “oppresed” by the Patriarchy and it’s plethora of spacious suburbs, TV’s, affordable cars, automatic dishwashers and washing machines, and overall First World living.

The woman that posed for the “We can do it” Rosie the Riveter poster in WWII quit her job after two weeks. She said the work was just too hard. She became a dental assistant and then married the dentist, never to work outside the home again.

Not to derail onto a sidebar, but I have said elsewhere that I can actually see how all the stuff you mention probably did feel oppressive to women. Think about it – pre-war, you are a housewife with a day’s worth of real WORK to do running a house and raising a family while your husband is off earning the income that is necessary for your family to live. Then your husband goes off to fight, and you go to the factory where you continue to work his old job PLUS the homemaking job you previously had. Then the war ends so you don’t need to work your husband’s job anymore AND technological innovation renders much of your homemaking duties obsolete. Dudes who sit in prison with nothing to do go crazy, and I can honestly see how finishing your daily chores in an hour and being left with nothing to do all day may have seemed like being in prison.

That said, I think that a part of it also stemmed from the fact that most women prefer to follow direction instead of lead. For example, with surplus time, a woman could take her cooking to professional chef levels. She could learn an instrument to provide entertainment for her family. She could come up with creative ways to teach her children necessary life skills. There is no limit to what you could do with extra time except that imposed by your own imagination. But all of this requires effort on her part, and most would just prefer to be told what they have to do instead of being free to figure out what they want to do (in fairness, many men are the same, and also in fairness, women have historically been conditioned to be this way).

What you just mentioned is what I call the prosperity paradox. This is where societies do so well that they become too comfortable and conformist to where they start breaking down from the inside slowly but surely. And technology didn’t help in this case. This is why, and saying this from my own experience growing up in a Third World country, you don’t hear much feminism coming out of poor countries. Too busy trying to survive to complain.

Then along came soap opera TV, fast food, microwave ovens and fat grenades, who most pulled the pins on happily…. the rumbling sound of household couches emitting the noise of muffled “ppppfffluffft” ..like a fart strangled by the cat she sat on when the fat grenade that detonates.

As far as I can tell, women have just found new duties to replace the old ones. Look at all the technological innovation in business. Does your job now take an hour and you spend the rest of the day with your feet up? Or has your employer simply filled up your day with new duties?

The come from a life of duress and combat, so they will be far better at many things that the rest of worldwide women…Harsh living and combat does that to people, but it doesn’t apply to the ones who don’t live in that environs. No, the women who are not Kurds no nothing of hard life and as such have no business being anywhere and outside of any business but the oldest profession.

I know a few Kurds and it’s true they take in females to be soldiers, but only those who demonstrate an aptitude for it and they pass a few courses. They don’t want their women folk to get slaughtered for “equality”, so those not cut out are guided to other roles outside of a military function. And you are correct, the Kurds know they are targeted for exetermination and are full on board with protecting themselves.https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a06d13aaf6e6992e5cbb6a16c2a43a788fd34f8e24a82cb0a3ab205c46772633.png
I find it a shame when a young woman (aged 19) like a above dies fighting islamic scum, but I understand why. Such a waste.

46% of Israel’s female combat soldiers are injured in training.
They are twice as likely to get injured than men even though the training is lighter and softer for them.

In my opinion, there is nothing they do there that a weaker and shorter man who certanly did not pass in the male standard couldn’t do. The main problem is that a weaker and a shorter man could never replace a woman in bearing children, the reason gynocentrism exists, and their lives are protected by not going to combat.

Women create so many cohesion issues regardless of their abilities. Last week my city had a married officer involved in domestic with his wife because he was having an affair with a female officer on his shift.

“Here at Return of Kings, we aren’t exactly the biggest fans of the great flood of women entering the workforce”

You know it’s not like before all this equality malarkey all escorts, strippers and tea-maids were men. Women have always worked and as a male feminist I affirm that fact. Damn it, I’m virtue signalling again

Also, and judging by camwhore culture, even at those jobs they suck. I mean, ladies, if you’re going to show them bewbs and lose your dignity, at least charge for it. Don’t just do it for likes. Dumbasses. These women have no sense of entrepreneurship. And they wonder why they make 70 cents for every dollar a man makes.

yeah, mostly, but the powers that be are prepared to move heaven and earth to create the appearance of similitude. Also there aren’t that many female fire officers I don’t think, but there are a great many of female police officers on the front line as those clips show. It’s not all window dressing

I can’t disagree with any of that, it’s the same reason women should be banned from being combat troops, corrections officers,fighter pilots and a whole host of other professions that are only suited to men.

6. Complete lack of empathy.
I knew a fellow who was falsely accused of making threats. He had called animal control on a crazy cat lady neighbor who had all kinds of feral and sick cats running around all over the place. I’m talking more than 50 cats.
One day she saw him smoking a cigarette on his front porch so she decided to “use the police as her personal weapon” as is usual the case for Disgustingus Patheticus Americanus Who Deservus To Dies Horriblyus.

So next thing he knows, big fat clip-haired lesbian cop is trying to haul him off, screaming “You’re going down!!!!”

No questions, no observation, to reservation, no thinking. Nothing.

Women are not fit to be cops. Not even fit to be federal agents either. Leave it to the men.

Besides, I have seen what police work does to women. By 40 their shape is gone, and they have male pattern baldness on the front of their hairline from it. The female system cannot handle this kind of stress.

I was busted by a female cop once for getting into an argument with my girlfriend in front of her house. We were standing on a side-street fighting over some stupid shit. Got busted for obstructing traffic or some retarded thing when the cop could have just told us to move two meters onto the sidewalk. This was not a busy street with any traffic, cop was just being a cunt.

When we went to the court date to fight the ticket the lesbian police officer actually showed up and tried to push the case. The judge looked at the situation with a clear expression of “Why the fuck are we wasting time on this shit? You kids just go the fuck home!”.

I’ve dealt with male cops before and they are way less petty… They’ll just take your weed and smoke it at the office but leave you alone. Dyke cops, and dyke workers in general, are the fucking worst.

Almost every woman that gets job has to let us know shes a woman doing this job. There is no “I do this job because I love it” mentality. Judge Judy is the rare type of woman to just do what she wants to do. Sometimes even as red pill you got to give props to some women.

I have a strong belief that feminism is rooted in communist oppressor/oppressed ideology. A feminist sees herself as this oppressed being who, in order to make this egalitarian society (which will never happen), has to rig the system to make things “fair” with equal outcome. Problem is, men and women are not the same.

As God intended, we are complimentary in our roles, not competitive. I bring home the bacon, she cooks it and takes care of the kids. However, because of the oppressor/oppressed thought, a feminist woman looks at the world and sees “patriarchal oppression”, at any difference, including draft requirements and child custody there the woman is “forced” to take care of the kids after a divorce.

I used to have a friend when I was young with a bull dyke mom. Trust me, lesbians do not like gay men. I remember she used to get into it with one of her neighbors that was a gay man all the time. They called them names like faggot, turd burglar, ass rapists, AIDS cannon, etc. Her hatred and disgust of gay men, heck men in general was gargantuan. Dykes have all the aggression and hunger for dominance of a man, and the sensibilities of a woman, that’s why they’re such bad news.

percent of men and 35.4 percent of women living with a same-sex partner
experienced intimate-partner physical violence in their lifetimes, compared
with 7.1 percent and 20.4 percent for men and women, respectively, with a
history of only opposite-sex cohabitation. Transgender respondents had an
incidence of 34.6 percent over a lifetime according to a Massachusetts survey.”
welp – there you have it! thanks!

Female police officers like inexperienced male officers seem far more likely to escalate a tense situation through lack of confidence, anxiety, or more generally fear. Even in the above videos its clear that in many cases aggression from suspects will only occur because there is a perceived lack of authority or any kind of commanding presence. The small police woman who man-handles the black teenager on the bike was guilty of creating a dangerous situation through sheer incompetence, and that guy will resent that encounter for the rest of his life, even if he doesn’t allow it to get to him. Its in situations like that people get unnecessarily tasered or shot, where a male officer would be at least capable of defusing the situation.

As always there can be no official recognition that such pragmatic constraints on ‘equality in action’ need to be acknowledged in any way, even where there is clear evidence that such policies are costing lives. What needs to be asked is what an acceptable loss of life would be for the achievement of the appearance of gender policy, just as that question needs to be asked of utopian projects like communism that have cost tens of millions of life for no discernible reason. Until that question can enter the public discourse, within as legitimate debate, then we might as well conclude that in all respects we live in a society that ALWAYS values theoretical equality (typically of a sham nature) above that of human life. With the prospect of women entering the front-line of soldiering that debate may have implications far beyond a few encounters with violent refugees who haven’t been to re-education camp yet.

Another slightly concerning thing is that in view of the physical inabilities of women in front-line jobs like policing, fire-fighting and soldiering while a small proportion of women will put their lives and those of their male colleagues at risk the reality is that unofficially these jobs will continue to be performed overwhelmingly by men. What this often means is that the front line ‘grunts’ so to speak remain male but that female advancement is focused on management. In London for instance the fire-fighters who tackled the Grenfell tower blaze were exclusively male but the fire chief was female (and arguably made a bad judgement call). Likewise, with the terror incidents at London Bridge etc, where Cressida Dick has taken the helm as met police commissioner. If a woman is actually demonstrably competent I don’t actually have any ideological issues with advancement, but here you have a somewhat perverse situation where men are taking nearly all the real risk, performing all the real dangerous tasks (except where incompetence or ill-preparedness plays a role) while they are being managed by people, who often (if not necessarily?) by nature of the constraints of their biology are being relegated to positions above them. This is completely upside down. It’s like the situation in europe where the defence ministries of european nations, are increasingly going to young female politicians, who then have power over armies comprising mostly males. There is something truly perverse about this.

very true, and it’s male students who suffer because of that, in terms of getting drugged up on ritalin, being diagnosed with conduct disorders, or otherwise being ‘unable to deal with authority’ which of course an inability to deal with its absence

parents don’t learn how to be parents any more, and if they try to behave as they should they are undermined by the state. You’re right parents aren’t supposed to be their child’s friend, but children have few boundaries these days with regards to any authority figures. It’s probably in part an over-reaction to the reverse situation, not to mention cold distant upper middle class parents sending their offspring off to be abused in so many different ways at boarding school

Agree with that. Removing the male principle from child rearing is also in a sense to remove the female principle of mothering, at least insofar as the former requires a division of labour in the form of clearly bounded sex roles. If the problem we have with parenting (and teaching) is that things have become too feminised that is partly about women trying (and inevitably failing) to perform both roles, be all things. Discipline and boundaries are the first casualty. The substitution of sex roles and masculine discipline for ‘love’ as though such a thing, whatever it means, is all that is involved in parenting, is one of the great con tricks of our time. Of course parents should love their children (I’m not sure teachers need to love their pupils though they should probably like children) but performing the function of parent involves performing functions and skills that are highly sex (gender) specific

I’m half asian, racially if not culturally so much. I wouldn’t hold up asian families as the ideal necessarily. Fathers too often act as tyrants rather than as merely as the head, families are too often obsessed with honour (sometimes with tragic results) and as soon children, particularly girl children become westernised, they are liable to revolt. Beyond that they may have their virtues

‘Agree with that. Removing the male principle from child rearing is also in a sense to remove the female principle of mothering, at least insofar as the former requires a division of labour in the form of clearly bounded sex roles. If the problem we have with parenting (and teaching) is that things have become too feminised that is partly about women trying (and inevitably failing) to perform both roles, be all things. Discipline and boundaries are the first casualty. The substitution of sex roles and masculine discipline for ‘love’ as though such a thing, whatever it means, is all that is involved in parenting, is one of the great con tricks of our time.’

All agreed.

‘If the problem we have with parenting (and teaching) is that things have become too feminised that is partly about women trying (and inevitably failing) to perform both roles, be all things.’

Yes, women totally fail to be both nurturing and stern as the situation demands.

However, there is one catastrophic element we should identify clearly.
Women are incapable of recognising their own inadequacy and behaving accordingly.

Therefore, they always, and that’s ALWAYS blame the child/society/other staff when there are reoccurring problems with behaviour.
In 15 years I’ve always worked in female run schools only one school had real control of the children.
However, the women running all these schools were utterly convinced of their own competence, regardless of the evidence staring them in the face every single day.

This is a fundamental problem when women are in authority; lack of reflection and logic. Women hold ‘a policy’ as a sacred thing as they are incapable of generating their own morality orientated personal codes.

It’s always feelings first and a disaster for the children.

As for English parents, I’m pulling my punches. Honest.

Whatever issues you think might exist, the reality is worse.

As for the very high number of Asian families I have had contact with, the ‘issues’ are expecting too much from their children, working them too hard (tutoring).
Terrible, eh?

The anglo-Indian marriages I know (here in Leicester) don’t suffer from this Old Fashioned Dad problem. Though I’m sure it is an issue, that is NOT an ‘issue’ as far as we teachers are concerned.

We like to see our children arrive at school who are fed, rested and in clean uniform. How many white English ‘professional’ families can achieve that?

“Women are incapable of recognising their own inadequacy and behaving accordingly”

A lot of that has to do with the fact that they doped up to the eyeballs with feminist theory. If a young female teacher go into teaching and find it difficult to assert her authority she has an other-blaming attribution scheme immediately to hand, one that tells her the problem lies not with her, but with the (male) pupils she’s teaching. That’s a disaster waiting to happen for any young men, with the slightest independence of mind that she encounters. Female teachers are a problem today because they are so overwhelming in their numbers they can only serve to feminise teaching and as such marginalise young men in the process. When the balance was healthier things seemed to work better. There have always been traditional school maams, some of whom used to be quite fearsome, although that type tends to work better with young kids. My sister is a teacher, and is far from feminist or feminising in her approach. I’m not aware she has difficulty asserting her authority in the classroom. I think the problem relates firstly to the unbalanced ratio of female to male teachers, and secondly to the toxic effect of feminism on teaching practice and values. Boys don’t need an all male teaching environment, but as they get older, and start challenging things – which far more than with girls is how they learn – they need at least some male teachers to enable them to develop towards adulthood

The other issue is kids from single mother homes who’ve grown used to mom not being able to be strict, than has that archetype for females in dealing with their mostly female teachers. If mom’s a pushover, waffles on the rules, can’t maintain consistent order for them— why think that female teacher is going to be any different?

Had to help my daughter, who is a teacher, deal with it.
You don’t ask, suggest, hint. You do not proved the slightest doubt they have been given an order and it is just unfathomable, unthinkable that they will not obey. You look them in their beedy eyes and order them and you do not look away until they have proceeded on mission assigned.

Yeah, and she did her training program in an inner city school with virtually no rules. It was almost impossible to maintain any order- kids could use their cell phones during class, come and go as they please. Weird. Frustrating for her, but she learned a lot about kids from that demographic.
She loved going from there to a school with logical rules that she could hold the kids too. But did have issues with both boys and girls obeying simple direction at first. Pointed out if you set and hold high standards from the get go and are consistent, they fall in line and it is much easier to be more relaxed as time goes by. Try and be nice and relaxed up front and they’ll take advantage of it.

nothing like a baptism of fire, to stand you in good stead. With the right values, approach and skills / technique there’s no reason why women shouldn’t be competent teachers, but they are always likely to find it hard to teach boys, even when they aren’t being challenging (it’s not like girl students are always well behaved). Beyond that I still think feminism and an excessively female educational environment is toxic for boys learning, and probably girls too. Women rarely approach knowledge in the same way as men do

I agree. Her biggest problem seemed to be female administrators wanting to cut kids tons of slack. Give them room to express themselves B.S.
BTW- female gang members in her classes were her biggest problem. Grudges outside the class and drama being dragged in.

It’s the same as a child telling you to give her your ID. These always a male cop (babysitter) with a female cop where I just roll my eyes and ignore the female cop and talk logic to the male cop! You can see the pain in his eyes…

my concern is really with the front-line situation – i.e. the kinds of circumstances that can escalate and get out of control, particularly if one officer is at risk of over-reacting because she’s scared etc. I have dealt with female community support officers etc and they can be perfectly fine at their job, but at the same time they’re not going to be taking down any potentially violent criminals. Horses for courses etc

I used to work for this court reporting firm years ago. Over 95% of the employees were women. On the one hand, I scored a lot of pussy. On the other hand, I had to listen to endless smear-campaign conversations. What a cunt this woman was, what a bitch that woman was, what an asshole one of the male partners was, what an idiot the other male partner was. This was quite a while back, so I could still get away with saying shit like, “Why don’t you hens stop clucking and do something productive like shaving your armpits.” I don’t imagine that would go over too well today.

That waste of oxygen is going to be 6 feet tall and 180 pounds, wait try 200 pounds plus, more like 6-2 and 220 pounds. A 5 foot tall 120 pound woman is not going to be much of a threat to a 6-2 220 pound man.

Female cops, being aware that they can’t handle male suspects, are much more likely to use their gun. If you care about how many dindu nuffins get shot for dinduing nuffin, then keep the women away from the police academy.

On the other hand, fitness standards for police have declined quite a bit. I’d like to see a study that demonstrates the correlation between an officer’s body weight and the number of incidents where the officer used weapons. Chances are, the reduction of those standards is connected with making room for and accommodating women.

Not to talk smack about the cops that know their business and keep their physique up to the task. But those guys stand out, and being able to remain in control of a situation using manual takedowns really does mean fewer shots fired.

I read an interesting article that made the claim that the Rampart LAPD scandal was a result of relaxing standards in order to increase minority hires.
It led to recruitment of sub-standard officers of all races- including whites that wouldn’t have been hired under the old standard.

My sociological knowledge is gleaned solely from watching television and movies, where blacks never do anything wrong. It’s always the Evil White Man. Oh wait, that’s how liberals get their views of the world. I guess I’m a liberal.

Yes, I think this is correct. Even in the UK, where the normal police don’t have guns (there are armed response units). There were two cases in recent months that come to mind (going purely from memory here). In one case it was another of these cams on the police officer’s uniform. A male and female cop went to a guys front door, not sure what about. Big tough guy. He wasn’t cooperating, clearly, but wasn’t violent either. The woman got scared and pepper sprayed him, which drove him crazy. He came out fighting, she backed well away and let her male partner fight with him and after a good fight got him pinned to the ground. THEN she came up and assisted. BOTH of them got a commendation. To my mind, she was worse than useless, she made the situation worse and then left her partner to deal with it.

In the second case, a male and female officer stopped a middle-aged (or 50s, can’t remember) black guy in the street and asked for his ID, because he was close to a description they had of some suspect. There was a neighbour in his front garden next to them watching. The guy got annoyed that he was being considered a suspect and started walking away without showing his id. The woman cop immediately got out her tazer and zapped him, although he was not running and was showing no threat to them. Turned out he had been the black communuty police liaison person for several years and took it as a personal affront that they suspected him. He was being an asshole, but again, the woman drew a weapon (fortunately she did not have a .38) completely unnecessarily. Women feel threatened far too easily – or then again not too easily given how much weaker they are, but too easily for a cop.

Women make terrible cops and terrible national leaders as well. There are many stories in this thread with example after example how bad bitch cops are but when I search ‘bad female cop’ on Google, there’s no articles connecting the dots with case after case and summing everything up. There are discussions and blogs down on the scroll, but you have to directly type in ROK to get here. There’s something peculiar going on with Google search results.

It was revealed that Google was skewing search results favoring Hillary Clinton before the election. To search ‘Clinton body count’ you would get the website for ‘Clinton Auto Body Shop’ somewhere in the midwest. This skewing of results was deliberate where a program was ran to twist the ‘autocomplete’ search function into a knot and deviate from much needed incriminating anti-Hillary info. And if you took the time to scroll past the loop bullshit and reach a juicy anti-Hillary site, then a shill globalist lefty establishment group called ‘PolitiFactCheck’ that looks official but is full of sjw shit tacks on a sub note below anti Hillary results as ‘False’ or ‘Mostly false, further downplaying the result. Google is up to its eyeballs in the leftist/feminist narrative pushing.

Here’s an example: Try searching ‘Matriarchy’ and then click ‘images’. Here’s what you get:

So currently searching ‘patriarchy’ only brings results of nothing but pro matriarchy/radfem shit. So Google is all the way to the floor skewing the results to smear patriarchy. They are to the core as bad as the worst sjw feminist hooligans and terrorists. Google is as much the enemy as the most radical man hating nut jobs out there. The ‘Big red’ monster even came up in the images. That’s all fine but what disturbes me is not a thread on pro-patriarchy or pro-family. Imagine someone young or naive who doesn’t know exactly what ‘patriarchy’ or ‘matriarchy’ means who searches google only to be led to the hottest and most rabid, pro radical feminist sjw propaganda sites. Google has some baad baad very bad folks in there. I couldn’t even find ROK when I searched ‘matriarchy’ or ‘patriarchy’ images. It used to be near the top in my old searches in the past. SOMEONE is up to something! Hmm? It this what all of the “make $97/hr working for google” hype is all about? Proofing sites so google can use the feedback to doctor search algorhythms? If only those stupid spam bots would respond back. I heard of a person who did kratom once and a bot responded back soon thereafter and the chick agreed to a hook up. The guy went outside and the street signs started chasing him. That was some killer kratom.

Check those images out. Hmm. Mostly white men; Donald Trump’s photo appears in the top 25 results. Along with that half-breed criminal who is allegedly dating that billionaire’s daughter…what a shock, they’re creating perception and ignoring reality.

News about Islam on the attack is vital in any refugee sanctuary zone where the powers pull the wool over the resident’s eyes. So many Swedes and Germans seem so clueless and starved for motivational reads. Editors in Sweden and Germany must be busy doctoring the web like they used to be busy all over the west in past times censoring, sanitizing and kosherizing the news back in the days of printed newspapers. They shoved their own favored editorials down your throat in the fishwrap paper. Please don’t tell me the same slime has creeped into controlling the info on the web. We have to hack their shit.

Here’s a cute Google story. Not long ago, Google became licensed to do mortgages. Fast-forward to today, and Google shows Zillow web pages in the Top 3, pretty much exclusively, for virtually every real estate search known to man. Why? Because Google partnered with Zillow to handle the mortgage loan side of Zillow’s online real estate business. “Nothing to see here, move along.”

Well, MCGOO is suggesting they need to be viewed with suspicion due to their philosophical biases. I don’t necessarily see a reason to fault them for promoting their business interests, though.

Or, I’ll even extend that. I don’t know where the idea comes from that any information provided to you must be in good faith and free of any bias. There aren’t any special obligations or rights just because … well, finish this sentence any way you want.

Google built its empire on the backs of web developers. Google got hot back in 2000 – nobody had really heard of them up until that point in time. AltaVista was the world’s top search engine back then. (Alta who? I know…weird.) Google made a solemn promise that they would never put ads on their search engine results pages. Their corporate motto, to this day, is “Don’t be evil.”

Without the assets provided to them by web developers (namely, websites), Google had nothing at all. Web developers were not compensated by Google for showing the world their web pages. Boom, 2003 comes along, and AdSense and AdWords come along, and Google breaks its promise. Immediately, online businesses were ruined, as Google torqued its algorithm and buried relevant websites, deliberately skewing their search results and making them a jumbled, irrelevant mess, so people would click on the AdWords ads that used to appear on the right side of every single search results page.

Nowadays, Google doesn’t even bother to pretend the game isn’t rigged. They put paid ads up at the top of most search engine results, which appear very much like organic search results (they don’t look like ads), and they often gobble up the Top 5 positions. It resembles the Yellow Pages more and more – if you are a Fortune 500 company, you are likely to appear in the Top 10 for your niche.

I saw this coming back in 2000, and I’m surprised they didn’t morph into the monster they have become more quickly. But they flat-out fucked the people who built their empire, gave them no recompense, lied to them, and left them for dead. Now they are destroying businesses left and right while totally abandoning relevancy in their search engine results.

The search engines were originally created to be neutral, relevant and accurate. Now they’re just giant money-inhaling conduits that vaporize businesses left and right. If a guy thinks that’s okay, well, he’s entitled to his opinion. But when they come and take his job away, I hope he has the good sense to not say anything about it…

I saw a promo for some new empowered-chick series on TV; it’s on the ABC Family channel. Its tagline was “Smash the Patriarchy”. I think it’s called “The Bold Type”. Yeah…that’s the one. Subtle. Like a crow bar to the face.

Yes it would. I’ve thought long and hard about starting a website that features red pill movies, independent films. I’m getting so sick of the shit Hollywood puts out that I want to produce my own films. And showcase other guys’ stuff. Not to make money, mind you, just to do it. It’s on my bucket list.

Maybe start a media network of sorts with podcast, streaming video and the like also which is virulently anti-Left, anti-SJW and so forth. If you do I’d love to be a featured artiste-I have a special knack for upsetting such retards and revel in being a ‘bad guy’.

Cool. I was kicking around my short film ideas here a couple years back. I’ve written three screen plays, one is a feature and two of them are shorts. They are all horror films – but I slip major red pills into every single one of them. I will be looking for guys who can do camera work, lighting, sound, and things of that nature. My angle is more subtle than the in-your-face, hard-core, anti-Left, anti-SJW stuff. I think if you can entertain people at a high level, and get your points across, subtly, they are more apt to embrace your points. But hey, anything that shakes things up is going to help. It all starts with ideas, exchanging them, and such. How do you see yourself fitting into something like I am proposing. How do you see yourself in terms of fitting in with the ideas and tactics you outlined. You mentioned reveling in being the bad guy. I like your attitude…

Interesting. I myself am not into horror movies-I find them as a genre to be very lazy on a whole and reliant on tropes and jump scares etc. But, I can tell you’d be considerably more adept at creating psychological tension and the like in which case I am an aficionado as I am heavily into Lovecraft etc. Maybe I could contribute with ideas and perhaps tidying up treatments/screenplays etc. as I think I am a very strong writer and have a twisted view of the world which could gel rather nicely with your vision.

That said, I love being the bad guy-where Occam’s Razor cuts delicately, I believe in Hammer’s Machete and sever with blunt force. Nothing is sacrosanct, I say things for what they are and revel in being reviled as some kind of pantomime villain saying outlandish things yet with each statement there is a deeper and more profound truth at its core. I liken myself to Roddy Piper and have no compunction in playing such a role to the letter and going far beyond-good taste, decency and the Leftist drivel mean nothing to me.

Hopponax (541-487BC) was a Greek poet who was known for being so good at insulting people that they sometimes killed themselves. He’s listed in wikipedia and wikiquotes. Unfortunately Britannica has no official record of Hipponax. He may be mandela effect residue.

And google bought Youtube. That was once a way to get information unfiltered by the lying MSM, but no more. They have pandered to SJWs and demoneterize anything not left-wing approved and skew search results. So now we have to move out to Vimeo or Mind.com or the others that will end up eating Youtube’s lunch.

For the last decade, my primary company website has consistently ranked 1-3 on the first page of Google. In the last 12-months, I’ve noticed that our organic Google placement is towards the bottom of the first page (approximately 4-6). We’ve been pushed down by these shitty lead generation websites (houzz, buildzoom, homeadvisor, thumbtack, etc.). For the last several years, at least in my region, these sites we’re simply paid ads that nobody really seemed to take seriously. Now, they have taken over the organic search and actually put a few of my competitors out of business.

Luckily, most of our business is referral. However, I’ve noticed the quality of our internet leads has diminished over the past 12-months. We decided to sign-up with all of these lead generation sites as a “Pro” – simply as an experiment. Wouldn’t you know it… the same leads we receive directly to our website, we also receive from these sources. The serious clients are now becoming “window shoppers.” This can do serious harm to a local/regional business, as it cheapens the sales process and eliminates the ability for a salesperson to establish rapport with the client.

Unfortunately, this is just another part of the trend toward driving smaller companies out of business. These new lead-generation sites are often seeded with start-up money from major players. They hang out inconspicuously for a few years. Then, a move is made and Google ranks them higher. It has nothing to do with the web developers in question having any sort of expertise at search engine optimization. They are ranked high because Google and related companies (tech startup giants) have a vested interest in their success.

At one point, Google actually solicited input from guys like me, about how to game their algorithm. That’s how clueless they are about the whole thing. Back in 2000-2002, I could literally (Hitler) make a small business into a million-dollar-plus business in a matter of weeks. I didn’t have enough time, I had no staff, and I could only handle one project at a time. Now, even though I am still holding my own, I am being pushed down to the bottom five results on highly trafficked search phrases for the real estate business. Eventually all the big real estate companies, most especially Zillow, Realtor.com and Trulia, along with established blue-blood real estate companies like RE-MAX, Berkshire Hathaway (formerly Prudential Real Estate), Century 21 and others will snap up all the remaining search engine real estate on the first two pages of search results. Nothing can stop this from happening.

There are ways to delay the inevitable. But by and large, we’re all pretty much fucked in the long-term. Eventually, every small player will be shut out of virtually every type of business, in terms of online exposure – unless they want to pay for ads that appear in the search engine results. And even then, the major players will outbid the smaller guys for the most prominent ad space. We now have Angie’s List (started with major player seed money), and we now they have the same deal for babysitters, and virtually anything else you can think of…it’s all part of the plan.

The future is bleak, I’m afraid, even for guys who rely on referrals. Eventually every niche market will be covered by one of these “we do it all in your field” websites that gets TV advertising and dominates the organic search results and the paid ads in those search results. People are fucking lazy and stupid by nature and there’s nothing that can be done about that. They don’t care if Walmart puts a mom-and-pop shop out of business. They don’t care if Zillow destroys real estate agents. They don’t care if Uber destroys cab drivers. They don’t care if the lead-generation companies you mentioned destroy the companies in your line of work. The only time they care about anything, is when it affects them directly. Otherwise, they’re too busy watching TV, jerking their cocks, and stuffing their faces with GMO-laced pizza and poison diet drinks. They want instant gratification and the faster the better. They commit financial suicide and kill their fellow man’s income streams as well, by doing this. Because they are establishing a precedent that will one day reach their doorstep.

I wish I could give you some good advice here. Unfortunately, whatever method I suggest would amount to a short-term fix and would be the equivalent of putting a Band-Aid on a bullet wound created by a .357 Magnum. Just keep plugging and hope for the best. The referral market should last for a while. Eventually, I believe the lawmakers will step in and impose heavy fines on all companies in all fields of endeavor that don’t spend a lot of money on massive amounts of certification requirements, and heavy insurance. In other words, it’s a planned death by a thousand cuts – if they don’t kill you completely via their insidious online scheme, they’ll make it unfeasible for smaller players to stay in business.

The same thing is happening in real estate. We’re returning to the days of the Feudal Land Barons. Even guys who own their homes free and clear are going to get fucked in the long term, because they will keep raising taxes and home insurance to the point where the average guy won’t be able to make those payments. And only the super wealthy will be able to afford the monthly nut on those twin demons.

“All a coincidence, of course,” says the indoctrinated, college-edumacated Pop Tart who gets his news from ABCCNNCBSFOX etc., and believes everything he reads in his-story books.

“Did your mother have any children that lived?” says I.

So it goes.

On a lighter note, I love your handle. Lou Skunt. Cracks me the fuck up every single time I think about it…

They are going to put sensible racist, sexist videos under a new category of video that the left do not like but are not breaking any rules which is basically a limbo where those video will not be recommended, monetized, liked or commented, and the ADL will select those videos. YouTube only recommend me cat videos, crap music, and anti trump news, does not matter how many stephen cucklbert videos I marks as “not interested” they push for the latest anti trump video to appear in Youtube home screen. It does not matter that I mostly watch Right wing video and independent news channels I never get a new video related in the recommendations.

– So basically, all subjective. A minority defining what is quality and what is not.

Google without any doubt supports pedophilia/sodomy. The characteristic of these companies is to appear nice in the beginning, they show themselves as being against censorship, porn, piracy, etc. Duckduckgo is not a saint either…

McDonalds free wifi won’t access ROK. A page comes up that reads “as a courtesy to our customers, offensive sites cannot be accessed”. But Roosh V site still comes on. So I hop over there when eating a mcdollar burger. Roy Rogers free wifi gets right on ROK though. Try and find out the category or list that ROK is labelled as. I’m curious. I don’t know if a provider has banned it but there’s probably a list or filter at work like the parental control filter for kid’s viewing.

Again, they’re in it for the novelty. They think it’s new and they are the only ones doing it.

Men have been criticized in the past for only being interested in police work so they can, “shoot guns n catch bad guys.” What’s bunch of meatheads, right? This is more-so the case with these chicks. They want to be “super crime fighter girl.”

The novelty, Zzzz, boring. It isn’t a novel idea. I was already bored the first time I heard about a chick police officer, chick pilot, chick firefighter or chick doctor etc. The irony of the novelty; these chicks really pretend to be unimpressed by men who are doing things they, themselves, cannot do. And they’re not smooth about it either. They wear their jealousy on their sleeves. Girl power chicks are so nauseating and boring. More irony; people who are extremely accomplished individuals always show an appreciation and gratitude for the finer things, big or small, they are definitely not walking around pretending to be unimpressed by everything like a snotty teenager, trying to create an illusion that they are so special. Girl power is about as interesting and original as a ten year old making fart noises with his mouth.

…and because they cannot physically subdue an average man, they will more likely use lethal force against virtually every man, because every man, per se, has a lethal physical advantage over most women, like someone who practises martial arts over someone who doesnt.

Years ago in Chesterfield, VA., two female cops answered a 911 domestic disturbance call. No telling if they knew the history that the disturbed man’s mother was a frequent phoner because the blue wall went up afterwards. CPD had previously sent male muscle and the man would go all puppy dog pleaser on them so safe for chicks amirite? Nope. Man already pissed at moms decided to exert his male authority on the female cops, charged one, took her down, and the other served him a fatal lead fiesta. No points for guessing “single mom”. Also no points that moms claimed police murdered her son. Points if you guessed that grown ass sonny boy wasn’t having it with moms ” bossing him atound” and he sure wasn’t going to let any more bishes be the boss of him, no sirree.

I read that as “no more bushes being the boss of him”. There’s a blue wall of silence regarding ‘domestic disputes’ being covered up with good patriarchs and even mama’s boys being blasted by hot pistol cops, both white knights and bitchcops. It’s an ongoing domestic purge of men within their homes. The phone is the bitch’s trigger and they use and abuse it. Afterwards the women are like “duuh, was it something I said?”. The cops are primed to shoot jack right in front of the house that jack built and pays taxes on.

Turn on your police scanner and you notice the chatter and hype whenever a ‘domestic’ call comes on. If there’s children, that’s a cash cow bonus for the county brusar’s drawer and the socialist service cops too. Units scramble like F-16s that just saw a UFO whenever a ‘domestic’ call comes across and they race in squadcars 100mph+ passing by crack deals going down to swarm a family household where a male is most likely trying to simply corrall an unruly teen mother/daughter catfight or something similar. And they come loaded and ready with the premise to execute the bad man. This shit seriously needs rooted out of government completely. Social marxists and women in posts in jurisdictions run by a leftist party machine are to blame and they need the swatting, not the men of the community.

Too many white knights wearing the police uniform. Honestly if the man is hitting his girl every drunken weekend at some point you have to realize that she enjoys all the drama. No rational person wants to be around someone who abuses them, so obviously the woman enjoys the drama of the police visiting the home. In the old days the police would talk to the couple get them settle down and then leave. Now they arrest the man and charge him with domestic violence. One conviction of domestic violence will destroy a man’s chances for a number of careers including military. A domestic violence conviction makes it illegal to own firearms. All this for slapping you wife which is legal in countries like Russia.

Sending female cops to mediate or respond to a call of yelling in a house is like sending a BLM group to answer a burglar alarm call where a black individual is in the process of looting an affluent white owned household and stuffing items in a pillowcase. They would assist the burglar and have sympathy. Or it would be like sending in uniformed gay pride marchers to answer a complaint about a bakery that refuses to bake a gay wedding cake.

Oh man… please don’t get me started on women in the military. I was in the Army for some years, as well as a joint-service unit, and they have no business in any specialty outside of medical, dental, and various admin/finance/clerical jobs. With few exceptions, they DO NOT carry their weight in any of the “non-traditional” combat support fields like mechanics, engineers, signal corps, construction/utilities, aviation, etc.

Some of those chicks were nice enough, but were just square pegs trying to fit into round holes. And then there’s the pregnancies, injuries, can’t do PT, can’t deploy, etc., etc.
Just like men, a woman’s gotta know her limits.

“I woke up a half hour ago already depressed by the grey day and the fact that my vacation is “over.”
My job is more draining than ever, after a bit of a reprieve. Once my supervisor was suddenly laid off last year, even though at the time I thought that was super fucked up, after a while I realized that her dismissal had significantly improved morale. She had been so so unhappy there and it really weighed on me. It was extra emotional labor – plenty of us perform emotional labor that’s not in our job descriptions, especially in service jobs. Once she was gone, I felt lighter. I didn’t mind it. At the time, this job was still just a means to an end as I was working on my capstone.
Earlier this year we hired someone who irritates me so much that it has to be me. Or it has to be the manifestation of my discontent with this job, with my non-career, with my life, with my vulnerabilities that keep me bogged down. Whatever it is, he annoys me so deeply, it is a completely new experience for me. Of the two people we interviewed, he was not the one I chose. He had an awkward handshake – that was my deciding criteria! This dude is awkward in a way that I don’t want to deal with, that was my initial impression. But for whatever reason they chose him, and I guess that really rubbed me the wrong way, because I’m the one who has to train him and the one who has to spend the most time with him.
He is nice, polite, and relentlessly chipper, but so anxious to please that he is constantly apologizing, completely self-effacing, paralyzed by details. On the one hand, I feel bad for him and I WANT TO LIKE HIM! On the other hand, interacting with him, teaching him to do all these things which are second nature to me, it’s fucking torture. This is my own special No Exit kind of hell: we are trapped in a cycle of pushing each other’s buttons, and I have no idea how to get out. He is bumbling because he’s anxious, his anxiety irritates me (not the errors), he perceives my irritation and it exacerbates his anxiety, his eagerness to please irritates me which also worsens his anxiety, and ultimately he performs worse, and I hate him more, FOREVER. I have no doubts about his intelligence or competence: I see my own performance anxiety in him every day and it kills me. And I hate him for it. And then I hate myself for hating him. L’enfer, c’est les autres.
I tell him all the time that whatever mistake he just made isn’t a big deal, or whatever detail he’s worried about is actually irrelevant to our work, but his very nature is completely unaffected by these assertions. I totally understand this because friends drop “helpful” truths on me all the time which change nothing about the reality of my life. I do not have the equipment to assuage his anxiety. It is NOT in my job description.
And then my own inability to ignore small sensory input, particularly sound, it feeds this hate. His sniffling from a cold every twenty seconds, his daily eating of a banana at a mind-bogglingly glacial pace, these soft sounds reverberating make me want to die. I wanna die! When I am on the phone, I have to plug one ear if he is also speaking on the phone. He speaks so loudly on the phone that I noticed you can still hear him in the stair well two floors down. Any time he spends out of the office, I am blissed out with relief.
You might remember the drama last summer of my rounds of several interviews for a position that ended in a non-rejection rejection: they recommended that I apply for another position in their area. While everyone told me this was a good sign, that they believed I was an “asset,” I was too devastated to even respond to their email. I couldn’t bring myself do it. I couldn’t go on any more interviews because I was too wounded by this rejection in that moment. I felt too bad about it, and I felt bad for feeling bad – that if I were normal, not so easily hurt, I’d interview for this other position, and I’d get it.
In December, after I’d finished my capstone project, I applied for a part-time webdev internship. There was a phone interview that made me feel like a fraud, like I didn’t know anything. I only remember one thing in particular that killed me: he recommended that I create a portfolio website. Well, I already had one. It was listed on my resume. So there were two possibilities here: 1) he didn’t notice, or 2) he did notice it and check it out but thought it was so crap that it wasn’t a real portfolio. I was paralyzed. I didn’t correct him and tell him that my portfolio website did exist, because I was terrified of the experience of having him evaluate it. I couldn’t do it! The call ended and I prayed that he would never contact me again. I went out and bought a tiny Christmas tree to try to drown these feelings in holiday spirit, and some old lady stopped me on my walk home to ask if I was okay because I was weeping walking down the street carrying a Christmas tree.
My capstone director’s evaluation of my project was glowing. You’re so talented and I can’t wait to see what you do next! My inner dialogue retorted, Fucking jack shit!
I have a graduation card on my bookcase that I see every morning when I wake up. Oh, the places you’ll go!
Fucking nowhere.”

This isn’t normal. What you describe is ‘synchronous participle process feedback squeal’. It’s like when you run into someone in a doorway and they step to the right and you step to the right too. You become embarrassed when you step to the left and they do too. Then it continues ‘left-right-left’ and it drives you bananas and your instinct is to get away from that person ASAP.

WHAT’S HAPPENING here is you inadvertantly ran into a person who processes information exactly the same as you. When you normally communicate or speak to a person, you form an information feedback loop where you process information and speak back with the other person. When you run into an ‘identical processor’ of information like in the doorway footsie phenomenon, you have a clash of ‘identical processors’ feeding into an increasingly tense feedback loop of communication and exchange. Your first instincts are to get away from the person because the stress is unreal. It’s like placing a microphone too close to an amplifier on a stage and the same feedback squeal blows the circuits in the processor/amplifier equipment.

GET AWAY FAST when this occurs with another person who is an identical processor of information or the squeal in your brain will drive you bananas and your brain will explode.

IT IS TRUE and notable that identical twins in the womb, although they are genetically identical, they have to develop vastly different personalities. This is a survival mechanism for them to develop differently. Otherwise their brains would explode from the feedback squeal in the womb and the mother would go bananas too. Everyone has heard about the ‘good twin – bad twin’ personality differences that occur with identical twins. They HAD TO develop differently in order to survive the close quarters of the womb.

One of these days I would like to try just for the hell of it, to see what happens the next time someone blocks my path in a doorway and begins playing the ‘right-left-right’ thing. I’ll keep going their same direction just to see if they go bonkers. I’ll be like “woops” “sorry” “ahem”. I once did the door thing with a hot chick. I was so embarressed and got away and so did she. Shit I should have made a point to fully kino her, holding her shoulders as we jumped right and left. Maybe try to segue it into a street dance with her. Hmm . .

All valid points, women should not be in the police or armed forces. I will conccede a tiny few places so that a large station has a woman in the office who can, for example, perform a body search on a female suspect etc.

Another key point to remember is that about once a month for a few days most women go a bit crazy and lose all rationality. Anyone who has ever had a relationship knows this. It’s why I always hope to have male pilots flying a plane I am in.

It all reminds me of the fact that feminism is nothing but a big shit test. Women ask for totally unreasonable things – they demand “equality” (ie token hiring) for company boards, they demand physical tests for the police, fire brigades and armed forces are dropped to let them in all while they never bother to demand equality in coal mining jobs. They choose not to study maths yet then demand tech companies hire more women. They behave as sluts then aged 35 demand to be treated as princesses

Most women don’t want freedom, they want a real man. And they are making absurd demands hoping to be told “no”. The white man is failing this shit test, trying to indulge them and beg them to like him. One group, whatever other faults they have, who pass this test are Msolem men. They pass the test with flying colours. Which is why those same feminists who rant and rave about the evils of the white men who gave them freedom and luxury will in the next breath welcome men from Islamic states who really will treat women as second class citizens.

Fascinating to read. The thing is women by nature are good at rationalising things to themselves. Reality, to a woman, is something she can pretend away or at least try to. This is a necessary part of their psychology – in their defence the world must appear strange if you get all this power aged 17 and it’s all gone several years later – you neither earned it nor can keep it. So they hamster wheel problems away, pretend they don’t exist.

It explains how women approach life and also explains why only men build civilization. The first step to building civilization is to face reality – so women can’t do it.

Notice another sign of how weak the west has become – how we bow down to their demand to call Bombay “Mumbai” and Calcutta “Kolkata”. Do you think the Indians will let us tell them how they must refer to New York or London in Hindi or Urdu? No chance.

Well- and it’s this kind of thing that makes me wonder about Tansgenders. They’re in denial about their own biology claiming what’s they believe in their minds should trump reality.
First reaction of any human to a bad situation or information is denial. This can’t be happening, this can’t be true. A lot of pilot (and military) training is trying to simulate bad situations to kind of normalize them and shorten the denial and reaction time to bad situations. Accept reality quicker and act.
I can’t help but wonder if people already disposed to denial and mind/belief trumping reality will be slower and less likely to accept and react quickly.
This wasn’t an emergency, much less an immediate emergency. But they had all kinds of bad information facing them indicating something wasn’t right. But no reaction to establish what the reality was, and therefore what needed to be done. Sit and watch for 90 minutes and what– ???? This is going to fix itself ??? half airspeed and significantly lower altitude (and hence higher fuel consumption) isn’t actually happening???

Sure, this happens with poorly trained pilots of any sex, folks running themselves low on fuel, getting lost or into weather they’re not qualified to handle and not being willing to ‘fess up in a timely manner. But these were a professionally trained and purportedly qualified crew flying the latest generation widebody for a major airline. A-fucking-mazing.

Women age like an already opened can of paint. They’re full value when new and ready to freshly crack open at fertility. They are to be used up then just like an entire can of paint. Once she’s cracked open, that paint needs spread fully and utilized. Otherwise as with an unused can of paint with the lid cracked and left off, it gets hard and the value shrinks quickly. It becomes a hard blob in the can with barely an ounce of usable goo in the middle of the hardened glob that you have to stab away to access.

When you crack open a virgin, she is to be thereafter mercilessly bred, one-two-one-two until she’s spent. A blissful happy woman is one who uses her machinery full blast for its intended purpose.

Women shouldn’t operate any machinery off the ranch – no planes, trains, busses, cars, nothing above 35mph. Amish girls are hell on wheels on bikes and rollerblades. They stay fit. But a lot of schoolbus crashes have female drivers. Women were put on thir Earth to breed and tit feed period.

SAD STORY this 22 yo Russian girl Sitora B live streamed her drive to work for her followers to watch. She was looking down at her fans singing as she drove when she crashed head on into a bus also driven by a female.

I think that you have never lived in the Middle East. Most Arab countries are closet matriarchies. The men are gigantic pussies. They talk a good game and will lay into a woman who they don’t know if they think they can get away with it. But they’ll never stand up to their moms or wives.

It’s because they’re dickchopped muzzies, circumcized. They are ultimately little bitch boys to their Imams, their mommies and their big sisters. Dickchopped jews are uber beta providers as well. All princesses but no king for the jews. The jews will never have a real king so long as they keep whacking their boys at birth. A whacked man grows up to be a whipped man, never the master of his own house but rather the other way around. Anyone who breeds barnyard animals knows that the more genetalia you remove, the more domesticated, tame and broken that animal becomes. You can make a raging tiger curl up in your lap like a kitty cat depending on how much you snip. Circumcision goes way back. It was like castration-lite and intended to bitch whip the men whilst still allowing them to breed. The practice is and always was intended for peasants.

Yep pretty much this. They’ll put on a good show toward a stranger if anyone is watching, but around wifey or mom they clam up pretty quick. They also clam up very quick if a foreign white man calls their bluff and squares off, they fold faster than my grandmas old broken lawn chair.

Had this conversation with my buddy on the ride back from our event today. Then I read a story locally about an unmarked squad car that was stolen because a female police officer “didnt realize she dropped her keys”. Too funny.

According to Wikipedia, due to that incompetent guard that was watching Brian Nichols, “Some family members of the victims filed civil lawsuits against Fulton County, Georgia. Judge Barnes’ widow won a $5.2 million lawsuit. County commissioners agreed to pay $5 million to Julie Ann Brandau’s daughter, Christina Scholte, who also sued.”

Nothing like driving onto a military base and seeing that the military cop that checks your ID is a tiny little girl who has to stand on the curb to see in your car….makes you feel super secure on base, lemme tell ya.

This article really hit the bulls eye. Since the safety concerns were addressed in the article I won’t reiterate them.
Women in police work totally kill any sense of cohesion and brotherhood.
Female cops either fall into two categories: dikes and/or whores.

I’ve personally witnessed many mediocre 5s and 6s bypass more qualified men for specialized units and promotions because they became some lt. Capt. or deputy chiefs little girlfriend.

Dikes now have a ” don’t say no to me or I’ll sue” mentality. this is dangerous when you are in a tac unit or a narc unit etc that requires a large deal of trust.

Female cops are almost always spared suspensions, discipline etc due to discrimination or a white night rank boyfriend pulling strings.

So what about the black female cops?
On a serious note, I recently tried out for my PD and there was a girl not even 21 yet at the try out. Being in my mid-30’s I was the old man I’m the group and I still did just as good, if not better than a girl who was about half my age.
Let it stink in that for try outs, police departments half to liar the standards for women in their early 20’s to match mean in the mid to late 30’s.

It’s incredibly common for women to be completely unable to physically pass a police academy. I went through with several females who failed the final PT test. Then they were re tested a later day and magically passed.

My main issue with black female police officers is that they truly believe their afritude is a substitute for competency. See the phone vid from the article for a small example.

Also they are constantly mating. With black cops but that’s just par for the course. It really bothers me when they start fucking ghetto thugs in the neighborhood (opsec anyone?)

But like all black females their purpose in nature ( and ultimate goal) is to sit behind a desk and tell people what they cannot do.

They end up being crass lazy bossy front desk officers or dispatchers etc. I had a pair I couldn’t stand so I would save my silent but deadlies for them.id go behind the front desk and pretend to be looking for forms and unleash hot nasty farts on them.The over the top reactions bring a smile to my face to this day.

Farts were created just to get back at annoying cunts like that. It doesn’t surprise me as the black chicks I worked with in the military were the exact same way. At least I know what to expect should I make it through the academy.

Yea you have a good leg up on what to expect coming from the military.
Good luck on FTO and your rookie year. You’ll do just fine man.
Lol if the military gave you anything it’s the quick ability to identify the solid dudes and avoid the shitbirds.

Yeah, no sh*t, get them out. If women make better negotiators or de-escalators (I have not seen any evidence that this is true all of the time), then let them be an auxiliary “officer” or a social worker assigned to the police department, unarmed and behind the protection of male officers.

Oh nooo, women start wars and drama. They never make better negotiators or de-escalators. They do NOTHING, read me NOTHING better than men other than BREEDING and TIT FEEDING. They look like silly penguins bobbling about in ANY uniform work attire as well. Plus we don’t need no stinking socialist workers in a patriarchy. We need good mothers and loyal spouses. That’s all we need from our women. The socialist workers, especially the feminized women among them are more of a threat to our culture than the robot mangina cops. Socialist workers directly panhandle business for the divorce rape industry. You take a socialist worker that teams up with a white knight police force and jew/radfem prosecutors, then you end up with a community that is unlivable and unsurvivable in the long term for any traditional family. You don’t want to raise your kids in any area crawling with socialist services workers. Are you kidding? You need to get rid of the lesbian social marxist threat first before a community is safe and livable for non-atomized traditional nuclear families. A socialist worker is worse than a foul feminist cop and is closer to a team of system operatives that are geared to clusterfuck the trad families of a community. They demand access into homes without warrent, something cops are often weary of.

The safest place for a normal family to live is a culture where there are armed citizen militia men only with absolutely no socialist services. Maybe a church StVincent dePaul org here and there but that’s it for needed ‘assistance’.

I generally agree with your recommendations, which would be applicable to any genuine community. I was considering a possibility for employing women as auxiliaries but again, I have not seen any evidence that women are better than all men even with respect to negotiating and de-escalating.

The problem is police do things other than beat rowdy men into submission.

They also have to frisk female arestees, they need to interview kids who are witnesses or victims and they need to interrogate female suspects. So I would say that you’re gonna need at least a few female police officers to complete these functions. Even conservative Iran has female cops for these reasons.

#1.
Oh man!
What was “Jamal” doing?
Hanging around to flash “crip signs” over her?

0

0

Top 5 Most Popular Posts

ROK Donation Drive

If you’re getting value from ROK, consider making a donation through the Roosh Booster Club to help us publish better articles and compensate our writers. Your donation is crucial in the face of Silicon Valley’s cockblocking campaign against us. Click here to learn full details.

Flagship ROK Shirt Has Landed

After many months of delay, we have launched Red Kings Shop to provide you with ROK apparel that will Kratomize your testosterone levels, massively increase the size of your penis, and make you the most beloved shitlord in your city. Click here for launch details.