Share

An investigative reporter who was arrested on Sunday evening after he published a list of names of prominent Greek business leaders and politicians holding Swiss bank accounts is now facing trial over breach of privacy laws, report ARTICLE 19, the International Press Institute (IPI), and other IFEX members.

Kostas Vaxevanis, a well-known investigative reporter and editor of the magazine Hot Doc, was detained 28 October 2012 and held for three hours before being released. He was ordered to appear in court the next day, but the hearing was deferred to 1 November. According to the journalist's attorney, he could face at least one year in prison and a fine of €30,000 if found guilty of the misdemeanour charge, says IPI.

The arrest came a day after Vaxevanis published a list of over 2000 names of Greek residents who hold bank accounts at the HSBC bank in Geneva in a special edition of his Hot Doc magazine. The so-called "Lagarde list" - an electronic file given to the Greek government by then French finance minister Christine Lagarde, now head of the International Monetary Fund - has been in the hands of successive Greek finance ministers since 2010, but the government has failed to act on it. In the face of growing anger among Greeks over yet another round of austerity measures and the perceived failure by the government to crack down on tax evaders, Vaxevanis decided to publish the list himself, saying it was in the public interest.

According to one source, Greece may be losing as much as 20 billion euros to tax dodging.

ARTICLE 19 agreed Vaxevanis acted in the public interest by publishing the list.

"Against the backdrop of the financial crisis – it is absolutely relevant that this information be made public; the existence of the list and its contents should be considered a matter for public debate."

The organization added that the government "ought to be responding to the information rather than punishing the person who brought it to public attention."

In an act of solidarity - or a challenge to the authorities - the major Greek daily, Ta Nea, later reprinted the names, devoting 10 pages to the list. Neither publication specified the amount of the deposits or any other personal information. Both publications stressed there was no evidence linking anyone on the list to tax evasion.

"The law on personal data was invoked as a basis for indictment. In reality, though, there was no personal data involved – only the fact that certain individuals held an account in a certain bank. We did not even allege that these individuals were guilty, only called for an investigation."

The case has set off a public outcry in the country and drawn international attention both for the speed of Vaxevanis' arrest - in sharp contrast to the many years it has taken the government to pursue wealthy tax dodgers - and for the heavy-handed police response. Vaxevanis tweeted early Sunday morning that 15 officers had surrounded the home of a friend with whom he had been staying “like Greek storm troopers in German uniforms.”

"This excessive procedure encourages the blackout that the authorities apparently want to impose on coverage of this case, which – although sensitive – is undeniably a subject of public interest," said the group.

The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) also weighed in yesterday, calling the incident "an abominable assault on the public's right to hold government to account."

More from Free Expression & the Law

In 2014, Cameroon enacted a broad anti-terror law as part of its effort to counter the extremist group Boko Haram, but authorities are using it to arrest and threaten local journalists who report on the militants or unrest in the country’s English-speaking regions.

Since 2013, law enforcement authorities in Bangladesh have illegally detained scores of opposition activists and held them in secret without producing them before courts, as the law requires. In most cases, those arrested remain in custody for weeks or months before being formally arrested or released. Others however are killed in so-called armed exchanges, and many remain “disappeared.”

This study examines the existence of criminal defamation and insult laws in the territory of the 57 participating States of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). In doing so, it offers a broad, comparative overview of the compliance of OSCE participating States’ legislation with international standards and best practices in the field of defamation law and freedom of expression.

READ AND DOWNLOADThis study analyses current trends in civil defamation and privacy cases in Hungary involving the media and summarises key challenges for freedom of the press and expression. Written by Hungarian media lawyer Bea Bodrogi, the study examined 250 court decisions related to civil protection of 'personality rights', an area in Hungarian law that includes defamation, privacy and personal image.

Freedom Forum has issued a review of Nepal's National Mass Communications Policy 2016. Among others, FF says the policy fails to articulate constitutional provisions relating to freedom of expression and mass communication. The policy, they said, also seems to promote centralided regulation, instead of self-regulation.

The Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV) in 2016 maintained its control over all public affairs and punished those who challenged its monopoly on power. Authorities restricted basic rights, including freedom of speech, opinion, association, and assembly. All religious groups had to register with the government and operate under surveillance. Bloggers and activists faced daily police harassment and intimidation, and were subject to arbitrary house arrest, restricted movement, and physical assaults.

Malaysia's human rights situation continued to deteriorate in 2016, with human rights defenders, activists, political opposition figures, and journalists facing harassment and politically motivated prosecution. Those criticising the administration of Prime Minister Najib Razak or commenting on the government's handling of the 1 Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) corruption scandal have been particular targets.

Authorities continue to use sedition and criminal defamation laws to prosecute citizens who criticise government officials or oppose state policies. In a blow to free speech, the government in 2016 argued before the Supreme Court in favour of retaining criminal penalties for defamation. The court upheld the law.

After already cracking down on freedom of information in recent years, President Erdoğan has taken advantage of the abortive coup d’état and the state of emergency in effect since 20 July to silence many more of his media critics, not only Gülen movement media and journalists but also, to a lesser extent, Kurdish, secularist and left-wing media.

This publication presents the findings of the media development assessment in Mongolia that began in 2012 to determine the state of the media in the country. The assessment was based on the UNESCO/IPDC Media Development Indicators (MDIs), an internationally recognized analytical tool used to provide detailed overviews of national media landscapes and related media development priorities.

“After the initial optimism during the Euromaidan movement, many journalists have become disillusioned. They are faced with the triple challenge of the war in the Eastern part of the country, the economic crisis and the digitalization of mass media.”

An officer of the Myanmar army recently filed a criminal complaint against two journalists for allegedly sowing disunity among the military. Even though mediation by the Press Council caused the military to withdraw the case, this incident demonstrates how the military continues to throw its weight to get back at what it perceives as negative publicity.

The government uses draconian laws such as the sedition provisions of the penal code, the criminal defamation law, and laws dealing with hate speech to silence dissent. These laws are vaguely worded, overly broad, and prone to misuse, and have been repeatedly used for political purposes against critics at the national and state level.

In recent years, the space afforded to civil society to operate freely has been shrinking dramatically across the world, presenting a serious threat to democracy and human rights. Eastern Europe and Central Asia (EECA) have been especially badly affected by this shrinking political space.

The report is a frank assessment of the recent regime of online censorship and mass surveillance against a backdrop of longstanding, serious abuses of the judicial process and attacks on freedom of expression by Turkish authorities.

IFEX publishes original and member-produced free expression news and reports. Some member content has been edited by IFEX. We invite you to contact [email protected] to request permission to reproduce or republish in whole or in part content from this site.