anita wrote:I appreciate any photos that do not include stupid dogs, flowers I can find in my yard, farms/villages, dusty/lame scenery and self-portraits.

Like this lot that is over 60% of this individuals contritbutions.....?

What is really ironic about your claim is that some of those "self portraits" got high scores via the bullshit voting system. Just goes to show how quality not quantity as you state in your post, does not prevail.

Not every photo that has a person in it is a portrait; surely those last two don't qualify as portraits.