I wasn’t breastfed and I turned out fine.

Written by Bettina Forbes, CLC

When we tell people we are in the boob business this is what we hear:

1) What’s the big deal? Aren’t most moms breastfeeding?

No. Although 64% of new mothers try breastfeeding, only 14% make it to the minimum six months exclusive breastfeeding recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Worse, most throw in the towel in the first few weeks. Compare that to Sweden’s rates of 99% initiating and 79% nursing at 6 months, respectively, no wonder the U.S. has one of the lowest rates of breastfeeding among all industrialized nations. Thousands of needless deaths, and billions in health care costs in the U.S. could be prevented by raising our national breastfeeding rate.

Especially shocking is that breastfeeding rates actually declined from 70% in 2002 to 63.6% in 2006 following the Government’s $40 million ad campaign highlighting the risks of not breastfeeding. This nearly invisible campaign was botched under powerful lobbying pressure from the formula companies–who increased their own advertising budgets from $30 million to $50 million while the ads ran. To top it off, the government buckled to pressure and held back a press release on a major meta-study underscoring the risks of not breastfeeding (see below)–information that prospective parents DESERVE to have.

2) I wasn’t breastfed and I turned out fine.

Another way of looking at this statement is to compare it to statements like “I didn’t wear a seatbelt when I was a kid and I turned out fine” or “I didn’t wear sunscreen as a kid and I don’t have skin cancer.”

For the first example, seatbelts, we all know by now that seatbelts save lives, mostly because of a brilliant ad campaign that drummed it into our heads, and statistics on crash fatalities involving seatbelts or lack thereof. Luckily for the seatbelt campaign, there were various industries that benefitted from seatbelt laws: automakers that installed them meaning new cars had to be purchased, and law enforcement that could fine if people were not wearing seatbelts! Most importantly, there were no industries that were lobbying against or advertising against wearing seatbelts, as it would be really bad public relations. Not so for breastfeeding. It gets lobbied against and combined marketing budgets total in the billions.

In the second example, skin cancer, it’s somewhat like the first; we know frying in the sun without sunscreen increases the risk of skin cancer, and effective advertising campaigns combined with industries that stand to benefit made for a great combination in educating the public.

But what if you add “yet” to the end of the sunscreen sentence? “I didn’t wear sunscreen, and I don’t have skin cancer, yet”. That’s really what we should hear when someone says “I wasn’t breastfed, and I turned out fine.” You may be fine for now. And we don’t want to scare anyone, but everybody is working really hard to sweep the risks of formula under the rug, and that is not right, or ethical. Parents deserve to know what the risks are, so they can make the best decision for themselves and their families.

So why do so many people seem “fine”? Well, for one thing, most people are not aware of the risks of not breastfeeding, so they are not thinking, I have digestive problems, or allergies, or diabetes, and it could be because I wasn’t breastfed. So when people say, “I turned out fine,” we try not to debate on an individual basis, because every person is different! Some people we know smoked like a chimney their whole lives and never got cancer, but nobody would dream of saying “smoking is fine.”

One thing people might want to consider is that times have changed. Our immune systems need all the help they can get given an increase in environmental stress, overuse of antibiotics, increase in vaccines (and the autoimmune diseases that may be related to that). While the previous generation may have turned out fine not so for this generation, that has drastically increased rates of obesity, diabetes, Crohn’s disease, allergies and autism, to name a few. Our view is that babies nowadays especially need all the help they can get, and that means breastmilk, either from the mother, or screened, pasteurized, donated human milk.

Here is an excellent summary* of the news release that was withheld under the influence of formula lobbyists:

Breastfeeding reduces babies’ risk of these diseases by:

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS): 36%

Type 1 Diabetes: 19-27%

Type 2 Diabetes: 39%

Leukemia (acute lymphocytic) : 19%

Leukemia (acute myelogenous): 15%

Asthma: 27%

Gastrointestinal infections: 64%

Lower respiratory tract diseases: 72%

Atopic dermatitis: 42%

Acute otitis media: 50%

And breastfeeding reduces mothers‘ risk of these diseases by:

Type 2 Diabetes: 4-12%

Ovarian cancer: 21%

Breast cancer: 28%

*(from Motherwear’sbreastfeeding blog, “This information comes from a new meta-analysis (study of studies) from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.This study looked over 9,000 studies on breastfeeding from developed countries, weeded out the ones with poor methodology, and came up with an overall percentage for each one. This is harder than it sounds because “breastfeeding” is defined differently in each study.”)

7 Responses to I wasn’t breastfed and I turned out fine.

This is an outstanding post with priceless information. I wish that the American public knew these facts. Thank you for all of the work you do. Imagine how rates of chronic illness and disease would change in the U.S. if every mom made an informed decision, reached her breastfeeding goals and was supported throughout the entire process.

You could say that people who were breastfed developed illnesses (for eg rickets) because they were breastfed too! Formula contains more vitamin D in general. Things are not black and white in the medical world there is even a study by the british medical journal which finds that adults who were breastfed as babies have harder arteries than those who were not (found it while literature searching for my nursing assignment). Im not saying that breastfeeding is not best Im saying that its not black and white in terms of whats right and wrong.

Hi Jan, I don’t think anybody is saying that things are black and white. There are many things that determine health: genetics, maternal health and weight gain during pregnancy, birth experience, breastfeeding and environment just to name a few. It is definitely complex . . . but I think it is safe to say that breastfeeding is an important protective factor that lowers the risk of illnesses in general, and should not be dismissed. With today’s children expected to have a shorter life span than their parents, anything that can promote health is a good thing!

I think the decision to breast feed should be the woman’s choice and hers alone. I don’t think women who choose not to breast feed should be demonized. My mother didn’t breast feed any of her kids and we turned out fine. Seriously, I rarely get sick. Maybe a cold once or twice a year. I did have a few health problems, but that was due to the fact that I’m missing a part of a chromosome. But that was something I was born with. It had nothing to do with not being breast fed.

We agree that the decision to breastfeed should be the woman’s choice! We support expecting and new moms to make an informed decision and to do what is best for themselves and their families. We support moms who choose not to breastfeed to get proper information on safe bottle preparation and on donor milk. Our point in this article that relying on anecdotal information is not the best basis for decison-making. For example, I don’t rely on someone saying to someone tells me about asthma, I rely on my doctor’s advice and on research I read to manage my asthma.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

I wasn’t breastfed and I turned out fine.

Written by Bettina Forbes, CLC

When we tell people we are in the boob business this is what we hear:

1) What’s the big deal? Aren’t most moms breastfeeding?

No. Although 64% of new mothers try breastfeeding, only 14% make it to the minimum six months exclusive breastfeeding recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Worse, most throw in the towel in the first few weeks. Compare that to Sweden’s rates of 99% initiating and 79% nursing at 6 months, respectively, no wonder the U.S. has one of the lowest rates of breastfeeding among all industrialized nations. Thousands of needless deaths, and billions in health care costs in the U.S. could be prevented by raising our national breastfeeding rate.

Especially shocking is that breastfeeding rates actually declined from 70% in 2002 to 63.6% in 2006 following the Government’s $40 million ad campaign highlighting the risks of not breastfeeding. This nearly invisible campaign was botched under powerful lobbying pressure from the formula companies–who increased their own advertising budgets from $30 million to $50 million while the ads ran. To top it off, the government buckled to pressure and held back a press release on a major meta-study underscoring the risks of not breastfeeding (see below)–information that prospective parents DESERVE to have.

2) I wasn’t breastfed and I turned out fine.

Another way of looking at this statement is to compare it to statements like “I didn’t wear a seatbelt when I was a kid and I turned out fine” or “I didn’t wear sunscreen as a kid and I don’t have skin cancer.”

For the first example, seatbelts, we all know by now that seatbelts save lives, mostly because of a brilliant ad campaign that drummed it into our heads, and statistics on crash fatalities involving seatbelts or lack thereof. Luckily for the seatbelt campaign, there were various industries that benefitted from seatbelt laws: automakers that installed them meaning new cars had to be purchased, and law enforcement that could fine if people were not wearing seatbelts! Most importantly, there were no industries that were lobbying against or advertising against wearing seatbelts, as it would be really bad public relations. Not so for breastfeeding. It gets lobbied against and combined marketing budgets total in the billions.

In the second example, skin cancer, it’s somewhat like the first; we know frying in the sun without sunscreen increases the risk of skin cancer, and effective advertising campaigns combined with industries that stand to benefit made for a great combination in educating the public.

But what if you add “yet” to the end of the sunscreen sentence? “I didn’t wear sunscreen, and I don’t have skin cancer, yet”. That’s really what we should hear when someone says “I wasn’t breastfed, and I turned out fine.” You may be fine for now. And we don’t want to scare anyone, but everybody is working really hard to sweep the risks of formula under the rug, and that is not right, or ethical. Parents deserve to know what the risks are, so they can make the best decision for themselves and their families.

So why do so many people seem “fine”? Well, for one thing, most people are not aware of the risks of not breastfeeding, so they are not thinking, I have digestive problems, or allergies, or diabetes, and it could be because I wasn’t breastfed. So when people say, “I turned out fine,” we try not to debate on an individual basis, because every person is different! Some people we know smoked like a chimney their whole lives and never got cancer, but nobody would dream of saying “smoking is fine.”

One thing people might want to consider is that times have changed. Our immune systems need all the help they can get given an increase in environmental stress, overuse of antibiotics, increase in vaccines (and the autoimmune diseases that may be related to that). While the previous generation may have turned out fine not so for this generation, that has drastically increased rates of obesity, diabetes, Crohn’s disease, allergies and autism, to name a few. Our view is that babies nowadays especially need all the help they can get, and that means breastmilk, either from the mother, or screened, pasteurized, donated human milk.

Here is an excellent summary* of the news release that was withheld under the influence of formula lobbyists:

Breastfeeding reduces babies’ risk of these diseases by:

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS): 36%

Type 1 Diabetes: 19-27%

Type 2 Diabetes: 39%

Leukemia (acute lymphocytic) : 19%

Leukemia (acute myelogenous): 15%

Asthma: 27%

Gastrointestinal infections: 64%

Lower respiratory tract diseases: 72%

Atopic dermatitis: 42%

Acute otitis media: 50%

And breastfeeding reduces mothers‘ risk of these diseases by:

Type 2 Diabetes: 4-12%

Ovarian cancer: 21%

Breast cancer: 28%

*(from Motherwear’sbreastfeeding blog, “This information comes from a new meta-analysis (study of studies) from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.This study looked over 9,000 studies on breastfeeding from developed countries, weeded out the ones with poor methodology, and came up with an overall percentage for each one. This is harder than it sounds because “breastfeeding” is defined differently in each study.”)

One Response to I wasn’t breastfed and I turned out fine.

I wasn’t breastfed. I’m middle-aged and I’ve had allergies since early childhood. I also have digestive trouble (although that could be genetic). My sibling, who wasn’t breastfed, is in the same boat. Our other siblings, who were breastfed, don’t have these problems. I have trouble believing that the formula that I received, which was produced in the sixties, could adequately replace breast milk. Use some common sense. My friend was denied his mother’s milk for the 1st few days of his life because he was switched with another baby at the hospital. The other mother didn’t feed him. He has had multiple severe food allergies all of his life. Oh well, if there is a connection, we can’t do anything about it now.