I have two separate machines in two locations that have multiple results that all have the same uploading error message (Project file upload handler is missing). I tried rebooting each machine with no difference. Both are running Linux Redhat 13.

You should check the main project page where they mention a major SAN storage problem has occurred again. Must be some pretty old junk to have the issues they\'ve had. Heck I have a first gen SAN still chugging along here. (amongst others) Though not nearly the kind of disk activity they probably see.

Give it a week or three and things should be back to normal.

I have the same errorr on all my completed work units \"Project file upload handler is missing\". What should I do?

EvoDude, I am a volunteer moderator, nothing more. I don\'t have any additional information to offer on the servers or plans or problems, nor do I have any access to post messages on the project homepage nor access to it\'s servers. So please, don\'t leave on my account. The \"Project Administrator\" title posted next to my profile name is due to the standard BOINC server code, and is not an indication of any duties.Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense

EvoDude, I am a volunteer moderator, nothing more. I don\'t have any additional information to offer on the servers or plans or problems, nor do I have any access to post messages on the project homepage nor access to it\'s servers. So please, don\'t leave on my account. The \"Project Administrator\" title posted next to my profile name is due to the standard BOINC server code, and is not an indication of any duties.

Don\'t beat yourself up. EvoDude\'s 0 RAC leads me to discover he hasn\'t run a single task here since 2007 anyway... Makes you wonder... or not...

EvoDude, I am a volunteer moderator, nothing more. I don\'t have any additional information to offer on the servers or plans or problems, nor do I have any access to post messages on the project homepage nor access to it\'s servers. So please, don\'t leave on my account. The \"Project Administrator\" title posted next to my profile name is due to the standard BOINC server code, and is not an indication of any duties.

Don\'t beat yourself up. EvoDude\'s 0 RAC leads me to discover he hasn\'t run a single task here since 2007 anyway... Makes you wonder... or not...

So, because I\'ve been busy doing other work, particularly at Rosetta\'s test project where I\'m 14th in the world and highest, by a country mile, in the UK means I can\'t have an opinion on the handling of the volunteers in this part of the project? Get real mate and check your facts properly before you cast aspersions. I PM\'d the Mod in question as soon as he responded to discuss this privately, again something you wouldn\'t know, but let\'s not let actual fact get in the way of you having a personal dig at me.

My suggestion:- Keep your nose out of my business till you know what you are talking about.

Whatever opinion you want to express, EvoDude, your \"bye bye Rosetta\" was both impotent and petulant, irrespective of what you\'ve done on Ralph. However limited the front page info it\'s been apparent the failure was extensive and mod.sense\'s reply seems as complete and accurate now as it did at the time. As was mine.

Whatever opinion you want to express, EvoDude, your \"bye bye Rosetta\" was both impotent and petulant, irrespective of what you\'ve done on Ralph. However limited the front page info it\'s been apparent the failure was extensive and mod.sense\'s reply seems as complete and accurate now as it did at the time. As was mine.

Aye aye - whatever. Why you needed to get personal about it I don\'t know but my post had nothing to do with you and maybe if you spent more time addressing the failings in your own site it would have less dead/broken links and people on here would be allowed to have freedom of expression and state their opinion without fear of unwarranted personal abuse.

Subject closed as far as I\'m concerned but no doubt you will want to carry on your own wee petulant, impotent rant. Doesn\'t make you right, you know.

Tasks starting with casd_ seem to be failing after 30 seconds of runtime, and then reporting with validation errors as per reports here. They all seem to show 100 starting structures and 100 decoys... and 1200 CPU seconds in the output, but around 40 in the task\'s reported CPU time.Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense