Many of the most notable events in modern (and even ancient) history have provoked some form of 'conspiracy theory'. That is to say, ordinary people were not satisfied with the official story about how the event unfolded because all or some aspects of that story simply did not objectively make sense. Despite what the mainstream media would like us to believe about 'conspiracy theories', most conspiracy theories are based on objective problems with the official narrative. But note that I said 'based on'. The problem with conspiracy theories is that, while they usually reflect a more accurate overview of a major event, they are forced to rely on theory (due to deliberate with-holding of data by official sources) rather than hard evidence (which would disqualify them as theories) and are therefore open to abuse by people who tend to use their imaginations to complete the picture rather than the more critical functions of the human mind.

Compared to other similar events where many people found the official story implausible, the Sandy Hook massacre has provoked a veritable flood of conspiracy theories, and many of them are not based on any hard evidence.

A large majority of the alternative news pundits that have attempted to independently investigate the Sandy Hook massacre have engaged in some seriously irresponsible and shoddy journalism. Among the more outlandish and baseless theories, we find the claim that "actors" took the place of the parents and siblings of the Sandy Hook victims, and that no children were murdered at all because, the theory goes, if they were, "why haven't we seen any bodies?" I've already exposed the logical fallacies in a few of these theories elsewhere, but there is one theory that still refuses to go away, perhaps because it is slightly less obviously bogus, and many people are still touting it as the single fact that "busts open" the official story as a "hoax".

The theory in question is that a man named Christopher Rodia was the REAL owner of the black Honda Civic, which has been identified as the car of Adam Lanza's mother that was found outside the Sandy Hook elementary school. The basis for this erroneous belief, still held by many, is police scanner audio that was picked up from the morning of Dec. 14th and which details Connecticut State Police response to the massacre.

I obtained the original audio files from the Radioreference.com website and had to pay a small sum for the full files. I have listened to them, and the evidence they contain can only lead to one plausible conclusion: that it is unlikely that the aforementioned Christopher Rodia had anything to do with the Sandy Hook massacre, even if his name and DOB are mentioned in the audio.

What so many of those who are searching for evidence of conspiracy at Sandy Hook have apparently missed is the fact that the audio files clearly contain police communications about MORE than just the Sandy Hook event.

In the audio streams there are several communications from Connecticut State police who are clearly not involved in the response to Sandy Hook and are just out there doing their 'normal' jobs of stopping people for no reason and catching speeding drivers.

The Connecticut State police scanner audio from the morning of Dec. 14th 2012, as provided by Radioreference.com, begins at 9.34am and lasts for one hour until 10.34am, i.e. it begins at about the time Lanza is said to have entered the school and lasts for one hour.

Below I will provide all relevant excerpts from this hour of audio, with my comments, which include the now infamous references to the license plate of Nancy Lanza's car and to Christopher Rodia.

If you wish to download this audio (which is split into two half-hour files, you can do so here (first part) and here (second part). Right click and 'save as' to your computer.

First audio segment: 9.34am - 10.04am

At 00:15, an officer refers to an "apartment door" and says "he is not responding to me verbally". (This probably has nothing to do with SH.)

At 1:55, an officer seems to be reading out an license plate and refers to a 'Camry' which is likely a reference to a Toyota Camry car.

At 4:28, a female officer says "we're outside waiting for the ok to go in". (This may be the first reference to SH.)

At 5:15, the same female officer says "it's now in lock-down". (This is most likely a reference to SH.)

At 6:15, a female officer says: "Dickenson Drive, 12 Dickenson Drive." (This appears to be both the address of the fire-house at the entrance to the SH school driveway, which was the designated staging area, AND the address of SH school itself.)

At 6:20, an officer says: "car is responding, the shooter is apparently still shooting in the officer area, 12 Dickenson Drive."

At 6:47, an officer says: "personnel take exit 10 then a left on 34 then continue on Riverside Road, Dickenson Drive, make sure you have your vest on."

For the next few minutes there are various communications that seem to relate to officers arriving at SH school. At 8:39, for example, an officer asks for "directions again please", another officer then gives the same directions to SH school for officers arriving from some distance away who are clearly NOT familiar with the area. That is to say, they are out of town CT. State Police.

At 9:18 an officer says "I have Newtown on the line yet."

Another officer responds: "Get Newtown on the line so we are coordinating with them; they may just want us to establish a perimeter."

At 10:45, more instructions are given about which exit to take and how to get to SH school. These are clearly not the communications of police that are familiar with the area. That is, they are not Newtown police.

At 11:49, an officer calls out a license plate "X-ray Libra Golf, 941.″

Then at 12:15, we hear a female officer or dispatcher say: "We've got an injured person in room number 9 with numerous gunshot wounds."

Between 13 and 14 minutes, more descriptions of how to get to SH are given.

At 15:00, an officer says: "negative on description, ok, shots were fired about 3 mins ago, quiet at the time."

Then there are more descriptions of how to get to SH school.

At 17:30, an officer says: "can you swing down here and get us a pink slip for his toll form please?" (This sounds like a communication that is NOT related to SH).

At 18:18, an officer says: "do you have a case number on this"? (See above)

A female responds: "number is 18264.″ (see above)

At 18:38, an officer says: "no violation, just the same kind of complaint from yesterday that he forgot the..." (See above).

At 19:15 an officer says: "Newtown's reporting one suspect down, the building has now been cleared." (Clearly a reference to SH)

At 20:23 an officer says: "Dickenson 91 in the Liberty Way parking lot, reported no injuries but possible side airbag deployed." (Clearly NOT a reference to SH, but keep 'Liberty Way' in mind.)

At 2:04, an officer with a deep voice, clearly NOT the officer that made the previous 872 YEO license plate report, says: "run the eh... operator, he's a Florida license Connecticut as well, first name is Rodia, R-O-D-I-A, Christopher A. Date of birth is, eh... August 6th '69."

For the next 8 minutes there are various communications, all of which appear to refer to SH: people being evacuated, staging areas and more directions for CT. State Troopers who are still arriving.

Then at 10:15, an officer says: "665 YRG." This could well be yet another call from a CT. State Trooper who is NOT at SH but is still out on normal patrol and is calling in a license plate.

At 11:34 and for the next few minutes, we have yet more directions about how to get to SH school.

For the next 6 or 7 minutes the transmissions are all about SH; the staging areas, people coming out of the building, etc.

At 22:02, an officer says: "763 Zula Rima Julliet, 763 TLJ Lucifer."

At 22:36, what sounds like the same officer says: "New Jersey plates, a couple of occupants, eh... not sure where exactly on Stoneway, I got cut off on the caller..."

At 25:12, what sounds like the same officer says: "Fat van? near 55 Stoneway when you're ready. Jersey, Charlie 6 6 Bravo SS, New Jersey, Charlie 66 Bravo Sierra Sierra, there'll be a few males in the van..."

At 27:10, an officer says: "Ford Econoline, eh registered to the Courier car rental out of Wayne, New Jersey."

Another officer responds: "the occupants are out of state they're doing a documentary on owl(?)-hunting in Canaan(?)"

The rest of the audio refers mainly to the Sandy Hook police response.

The two communications in bold above are what have caused many independent Sandy Hook investigators to believe they had found evidence of a "hoax". They claim that, together, the comments constitute 'clear evidence' that Christopher Rodia owned Nancy Lanza's car. But, taken in context, i.e. that both communications are part of a continuum of Connecticut State police communications on the morning of the Sandy Hook shooting that include State Police responses to the shooting AND things like traffic stops by police who are NOT involved with the response to the SH shooting, and that both types of communications are naturally interspersed... well, the rational conclusion then is that Rodia was just one of the several people who were stopped in their cars by a CT. State police officer somewhere nowhere near Sandy Hook school, as evidenced by the scanner audio.

In addition, it seems clear from the audio that some of the State police communications were coming from pretty far afield and had nothing to do with Sandy Hook; the reference to "Liberty way parking lot" in the audio, for example, most likely refers to Liberty way parking lot in Greenwich CT, which is 45 miles from Sandy Hook. The word 'Greenwich' is also spoken by a dispatcher in the above audio, although I didn't include it here. If you want to hear it you'll just have to listen to the audio yourself. If you do, you'll be among a select few individuals who have, it seems, bothered to actually listen to the audio in full.

By way of further evidence that Rodia is unlikely to be the owner of the Honda Civic, here is a copy of his consolidated property tax statement, showing that he does not own a Honda Civic. If he did, it would be on this statement:

Therefore, if someone could explain to me how a cop at Sandy Hook school could receive Rodia's details from the car license plate 872 YEO when Rodia doesn't own a car with that license plate, I'd be all ears.

And just for good measure, here's the consolidated property tax record for Rodia's wife (or maybe it's his sister, I can't remember now). She doesn't own a Honda Civic either:

The many internet news pundits and 'researchers' who have jumped on the "Sandy Hook hoax" bandwagon and relied on what has turned out to be spurious evidence that the parents were 'actors' or that Christopher Rodia owned the Honda Civic, are guilty of either neglecting to use their critical thinking abilities to engage in serious research, or are simply repeating these claims in an effort to get attention. Of course, we can't discount the possibility that someone, somewhere, has been deliberately encouraging the spread of this information in an effort to make anyone who questions, in any way, the official story of the Sandy Hook massacre look like a raving lunatic.

I understand that people who are already well-versed in the clear evidence of duplicity of the ruling elite may have a wilful tendency to accept as fact any evidence of further elite treachery that comes their way. But in our modern era of the all-seeing eye of the national security state and tried and tested 'counter-insurgency tactics that are practiced as much at 'home' as abroad, it is prudent to be suspicious not only of the elite but also of those who, at first glance, may appear to be our allies.

As a result of my own investigation into this massacre, which involved the discovery of a large amount of bogus 'evidence' of a "Sandy Hook hoax", I have been left with a very clear understanding that the people who carried out this particular operation are very powerful indeed. Powerful beyond what most people can imagine could ever be possible. While I have little doubt (for the reasons noted above) that more than one person was involved, I also am forced to admit that the perpetrators of the Sandy Hook massacre left literally NO hard evidence of their monstrous crime. Consider the level of control that is required to leave so little evidence when carrying out a horrific massacre like Sandy Hook. In addition, the implication is that the mainstream media were in some way complicit, or at least controlled and duped. The end result is the sense of "a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that [men] had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." 2

If we are to understand anything from the Sandy Hook massacre, let it be an understanding, born of careful thought and analysis, of the true nature of the forces that are reigned against us as we engage in the fight to ensure that Truth is heard in a world dominated by lies, a world where the wanton murder of innocent children becomes all too 'normal'.

Notes:

1. Thanks to reader 'wdthepoet' for this reference.
2. This is from a speech by Woodrow Wilson:

"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it. They know that America is not a place of which it can be said, as it used to be, that a man may choose his own calling and pursue it just as far as his abilities enable him to pursue it; because to-day, if he enters certain fields, there are organizations which will use means against him that will prevent his building up a business which they do not want to have built up; organizations that will see to it that the ground is cut from under him and the markets shut against him. For if he begins to sell to certain retail dealers, to any retail dealers, the monopoly will refuse to sell to those dealers, and those dealers, afraid, will not buy the new man's wares."

While it is clear that the "power" that Wilson was referring to was a business power that in this context was exerting control over "commerce and manufacture" and a "monopoly" preventing people from choosing their own business calling, it is also clear that he was referring to a power above and beyond the "biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture". To me, that's a lot of power.

That page was a static 'home page' that is updated rather than being created anew. If google did not crawl it by the 14th it would show the date of the last time google did crawl it before then. Basically, this is a fairly common aspect of the way google indexes sites. The date you are seeing is google's cache date of the last visit details of the google bot.

yeah sorry, i did start of saying "i think" - and i should've made it clearer, in my opinion, fact is, there busted.

im not jumping to the most sensational conclusion, but fact is, im still not convinced by your links, ..and i believe it to be perfectly mundane and rational to believe if that page was cached on the 11th, then the snippet shown should also reflect what was on that page on that date. i still consider it belonging on the list with the other unanswered questions.

if i do the same search now.. no date at all shows up.

obviously the government is lying, in cahoots with the media, as per 9/11.. the umpteenth death of bin laden, etc. to consider that a webpage may have been created prior, and i agree its not the most likely scenario, and it would be a rather stupid thing to do, but it is hardly the most sensational conclusion regarding this. in my opinion.

The dates in Google might be in error, but a date right on the document itself is quite another matter. We know of one document in particular (among others) that fits this criteria and that's the Arlington Red Devil's school website document named, "Talking With Your Child About the Sandy Hook Tragedy." Not only does the document have a date of Dec 10, 2012 printed right on it, but the directory structure created by the site's WordPress software back-end was the auto-generated date and name format, which included the date and name as a series of folders within folders. Of course, the document in question has been scrubbed from the site, but the Google cache still had the document as of Jan 17, 2013:

[Link]
In addition, it is claimed that Crisis Management Institute, the original creator of the document, basically admitted to an investigator that the document in question was generated by them on that day. The full story of that can be read here: [Link]

I think at a certain level, hard evidence stops to exist. Somethings can only be inferred from whatever subtlety, nuance etc they leave behind. This also leaves people having to rely on faculties that are under-developed in human beings on this planet, osit. However, I am pretty sure there is a solid way one can grasp at the unseen without stumbling around in the dark or covering up the blindness with ego i.e by developing/working on oneself.

But anyways, for now they exploit our blind spots.

In summary, we might not know the details or whatever but we pretty much know something happened that is beyond the official narrative. That is something rather than nothing because whatever level of pervasiveness or whatever this all encompassing power has, it aint pervasive enough to make all of us accept without question the official narrative.

When you speak of the terrifying power of the control system. This one and many other examples show us what thinking, feeling people are up against. They are up against masters of physicality, with dominion over the material world.

Worst of all, their ultimate prize is our consciousness, they want absolute servitude. That's abundantly clear, even if the details aren't.

That's one direct result for sure.Which tends to disprove the claim by 2nd amendment nuts like Alex Jones that it's all about taking their guns away. Why would the govt. murder children to take your guns away when they could easily predict that it would result in a surge in gun purchases, as has been the case in every other 'lone nut' shooting?

Results don't say much about intent. If you want to usurp the right of an individual to protect themselves, you don't care about the results of your actions, as long as the final outcome remains the same.

The radio traffic may be open to various conclusions but what about the man who seemingly has disappeared from the face of the earth.
I refer to the suspect brought out of the woods in handcuffs who in passing said to bystanders " I didn't do it " and was later pointed out sitting in the front of a police car.
1. The police were suspicious enough of him at first to put the cuffs on him .
2. He said he didn't do it but if he had been in the woods all the time and not in the school how would he know he needed to deny " it " or in fact anything.
3. Why was he sitting in the front of the police car , when you are picked up by the police you usually get to ride in the back behind the wire mesh , I don't know for sure but imagine that would be standard procedure.

"2. He said he didn't do it but if he had been in the woods all the time and not in the school how would he know he needed to deny " it " or in fact anything."

Could it be that he heard the gunshots from the school?

Or could it be that the cops said something to him about what had happened when they captured and handcuffed him?

If cops chased you down and cuffed you, wouldn't you ask why they were doing so?

If a crowd of people were looking at you, and if you were cuffed and being led to a squad car, and if you knew that you were suspected of committing a crime, wouldn't you yell something like, "I didn't do it!"

In short, it's not a stretch that there could be an innocent, rational explanation.

Replying to NugaBurd , if there was an innocent, rational explanation wouldn't it be better just to publish what that was . Sometimes it seems a deliberate ploy to keep things as murky as possible , either with no explanations at all or ones that are unbelievable .

The so called government can't predict anything. They are too stupid. If there had been armed guards at that school those children would have never been killed. No ones knows for sure if it was a set up or not, but you can bet that the commies will sure as hell try to pass step by step legislation to ban all fire arms in the US and use those killings as an excuse to do it. We have an illegal in the White House and a Congress full of liars and thieves controlled by the Federal Reserve so what makes you all think that they are not all capable of murdering American citizens along with all of the other people over seas that are being murdered with drones. Thank God and the Founding Fathers for the Second Amendment.

They want you to think they are "that stupid" and that things like 9-11 are just a "failure of intelligence." Don't be fooled, it's a ruse to put you off guard. And that's not to say that some really stupid people are not in allegedly "top positions", but generally, they are puppets.

Couldn't agree more with Laura. People seem to have a never ending ability to be fooled by the idea that we are led by a bunch of incompetents. See my article here [Link] to see that that is not true at all.

Anyone thinking about it logically should be able to see that if even 50% of those in positions of power were simply well-meaning idiots, so many terrible things wouldn't happen on this planet .

Just what does the Second Amendment, or for that matter, the rest of the Constitution guarantee for us? Perhaps the Constitution isn't a guarantee for us as it is as much a guarantee for the PTB. Think about it. We had a mass shooting, the media blitz comes next targeting "crazy citizens" with "evil military style" guns. Evil military style gun sales skyrocket because they are also the weapon of choice for the 2nd Amendment defending, free thinking, stubborn, independent "patriots" brainwashed into thinking the event is but another assault on their rights.

By tracking these gun sales, doesn't it make it easy for the PTB to identify and distinguish between who the sheeple are and who the rogue warriors are in the kingdom? Do the defenders of the Constitution actually think they can fight against an army of government soldiers and win in the end? How do AK-47 pea shooters compare against a vast array of weaponry i.e., cannons, mortars, bombs, large caliber machine guns, armored vehicles, drones, etc., that the government forces have? Remember Waco, TX?

Every firearm manufactured and sold in the US is first fired into a non-destructing gel, the bullets are collected then sent to the FBI for categorization and entry into their database. The ballistic markings are matched to the firearm's serial number. The naive, law abiding patriot who buys the firearm at either a gun show, gun store, or Walmart can be easily be tied to the firearm. The type of firearm says a lot about the owner's personality and intent for owning it. Criminals choose illegal firearms but they can also be easily tracked through the use of surveillance cameras located near the crime scenes.

With this information at the Government's disposal, they can narrow down and predict those who would comply with their ever developing agenda, from those who would refuse to. The very weapon the patriot thinks will protect him and the Constitution then becomes the object of betrayal, making for an easy round-up and elimination of any threat directed at the PTB.

As the harsh realities imposed by the PTB become harsher, the patriotic types who pop up like unwelcome weeds in the garden, can be easily be targeted and eliminated while the sheeple are allowed to procreate and continue sleepwalking; until finally, nearly all resistance is wiped out through this type of socio-genetic engineering.

My point is that we should refuse to believe their lies, truths, promises, predictions, threats, hope, and anything else that spews from their mass media mouths. Tune out, read old books, THINK for yourselves, and tune into our Higher Power who is more powerful than they could ever be. Sooner or later they will destroy themselves and their mindless minions while we and our children continue to be free. Our freedom lies not with our bodies, but within our minds. It is our minds that they ultimately seek to control. Once they have that, their quest for absolute power is complete.

"By tracking these gun sales, doesn't it make it easy for the PTB to identify and distinguish between who the sheeple are and who the rogue warriors are in the kingdom? Do the defenders of the Constitution actually think they can fight against an army of government soldiers and win in the end? How do AK-47 pea shooters compare against a vast array of weaponry i.e., cannons, mortars, bombs, large caliber machine guns, armored vehicles, drones, etc., that the government forces have? Remember Waco, TX?"

I grant that. We have already in place an undefeatable Military Police state. (At least undefeatable in the classic gun vs. gun military conventional war concept.) I dare say that given how anyone who has a clue knows that the whole "Red Dawn" Hollywood Hero scenario is EXACTLY that: a fable.

But if they come (I pray they don't), they won't likely - at least at first - come for the Jonny come lately's who followed the MSM protocol and magically went out and bought guns. (Indeed, those will likely be the very first to turn their guns in.)* (Has anyone researched if anyone bought call options on H&K or S&W & other gun makers a la the Puts made on American & United Airlines pre 9/11?)

Yeah, they've got their gun registers. But more than that, see what William Binney of the NSA has been talking about. I'd guess that of all the AR-15's that were out there in America the day before this evil event, "they" probably knew the location of about 70-90% of them.

What I fear more is the risk to free thinkers. I've long wondered about the supposed almost accidental and too-good-to-be-true "truth genie out of the bottle" aspect of the internet. What better way to discover who has half a clue? Moreover, as Binney states, and the evidence points to, assuming, "they" have built a file on everyone in America, THEY ALREADY KNOW WHO TO COME FOR!

SOTTypes (free thinkers) - (at least in the US): I, YOU & WE - ARE the FEMA-Camp A-Team List..

And they didn't need a Sandy Hook for that.

R.C.

* Far be it from me to know anything about firearms, pistols, rifles, rifling, guns, ballistics, "assault rifles," or the fact that the phrase "automatic" was originally designed to differentiate between revolvers and automatic reloading pistols, NOT fully automatic firearms. (Note that this has long been and remains THE standard MSM disinformation Panic Attactk-tic"*" following every one of these damn near made for reality tv events.) Indeed, I swear I've never even seen a real gun, except on TV. ;-)

** Panic Attack-tic." Not bad, eh? (I'd not be surprised to see it elsewhere previously (though I'm unaware of same.) I'd guess a 45% chance someone has come up with it before when I just typed it, as nothing is new under the sun.)

Such drills are going on all the time in the US these days. However, it is interesting that drills were taking place nearby as it would provide cover for people who 'should not have been there' to be there. When stopped by local and state police responding to the scene, they can plausibly say that they were in the area because they were taking part in drills.

I tend fall on the side of disarming the populace. Of course, gun sales will soar and that is to be expected. But that doesn't stop the power of draconian laws to simply take them away, or imprison those who refuse to comply or turn in their firearms. Gun sales will be a boon to the gun manufacturers, (financial boon) but the CLASS ? felony accompanying the laws they have waiting in the wings, ready to pass, without debate (like Patriot 1 and 2) will insure that the government will have PLENTY of weapons turned in, lest the sheep wish to be on the rolls of the PRIVATIZED PRISONS (another financial boon).

If there's one thing I've learned since 911 (the inside job) it's that the government is, in its present form, an enemy of "the people". The current state of draconian legislation which has been passed since 911 would drop the jaws of anyone in the 70's or 80's. NO ONE would ever have believed our government would turn into such a vicious, evil, self-serving, war-mongering, freedom-despising institution which wholeheartedly embraces terrorism on a daily basis, while concocting lie after lie in order to further destroy the fabric of the Constitution. Our nation, in it's present state had been USURPED by a government infested with the very same Bolsheviks or their supporters who, under Stalin, were responsible for the extermination of over 60 million people. A few kids in a classroom is nothing to them or their ilk. Just as 3000 Americans were nothing to them on 911. I've taught my kids one important lesson: Never, EVER, trust your government.

Sandy Hook and it's accompanying disinformation/misinformation campaign is a deliberate psyop created solely to disarm the American populace. Weapons confiscation it the last refuge of the tyrant.

And Alex Jones... classified as a waste of skin, alongside Rush Limbaugh, Glen Beck, and a host of other paid shills. I steer clear of them completely. Just me perhaps.

I think Amerikagulag means that in the debate about what the strategic objectives are of the real perpetrators behind the Sandy Hook massacre and other mass shootings, disarming the populace is their primary goal. It's understandable that it appears that way, but as we'll be discussing on our upcoming SOTT Talk radio show, this hot-button topic of gun control goes a lot deeper than whether or not 'the govt. is coming to take our arms.'

The solution: yet to be announced (note, however, that solutions always need to be seen to reflect the so-called ‘consensus’ – the ‘middle ground’. All controversial proposals are either a total distraction, or an ‘over-bid’ in the bargaining process, such that the final solution appears to be a compromise which is then called a consensus.)

‘Childproof’ smart guns are weapons which are ‘personalized’, because they will only fire when used by the person authorized to use that particular gun. Some designs use biometrics, such as checking the unique finder grip of the user, and other designs which require a second device (i.e. a microchip) to be worn in or on the hand, in order to activate the gun. Using radio frequency, the chip in the gun reads the chip in the hand, to validate the identity of the user and (de)activate the gun.
...
[Link]

You're right in saying that not every conspiracy theory is true, and you have shown evidence that the Rodia car one (which I hadn't heard about til I read your article) certainly isn't true; however, that's not to say that some of the other ones aren't true, and that of them, the most probably scenario still seems that it was a false flag operation.

video surveillance....where is it?
Remember, we STILL haven't seen the video surveillance tapes of the PENTAGON on 911. The MOST secure building in the world with literally thousands of cameras - and we get 3 frames of a cheap parking lot camera which shows us nothing.

I'll post a response here, since you screened out my response on your site.

I'll address one very surreal event in the video in question. A laughing and joking Mr. Parker (24 hours after his daughter was murdered), then a very quick (some might say "professional") metamorphosis into the role of "grieving father".
Joe, you can't convince me this is natural anymore than you can kiss your own elbow. However, don't give up trying...Next time "go whole hog and the postage"

Yeah, part of the 'terror of the situation' is people like you who add your strident and discordant voice to what might otherwise be a rational and vastly more effective analysis of government deception and corruption. People like you who can't (or won't) think straight and prefer instead to throw themselves head-long at every little detail and hysterically inflate them into "evidence" of conspiracy. You do such a massive disservice (and no small amount of damage) to those sincerely attempting to bring some truth to the masses. You make us all look as ridiculous as you do by (unsolicited) association.

But I take your point: attempting to expose the truth using hard data and critical thinking could be described as being like trying to kiss one's elbow, but that just emphasizes the effort required to really look at the hard facts and separate the spurious from the real. To take your analogy to a silly extreme: while I've been busy trying to "kiss my elbow", you've been down to the department store and grabbed the arm off of a mannequin and are proceeding to shove it, elbow and all, down your throat, while screaming about "actors" at SH. Imagine what that makes you look like.

By the way. how about the video of the aunt referring to 6 year old's "big sisters" (when in fact they are "little sisters"), not once, but twice. Also, The CT Governors almost apologetic statement regarding being told of the event before it happened.
[Link]I expect you to say, well all the governors are told... nahhh...it don't pass the smell test. The anomalies are piling up...too much to explain away.
So what is truth?
Where is the truth? I don't know. However, The Plan For A New American Century (PNAC) gave us 9-11 and Obama's New Years Eve signing of the National Defense Authorization Act 2012...for another...oh five years...which brings us into the next administration, whomever that will be. Democrat, Republican...all the same. Orwell lives my friend,and he lives in America, Britain and is stealthily creeping across the globe.
Our founding fathers must certainly be turning over in their graves. So, tell me Joe, what is truth? Read "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" and the two other books by former economic operative, John Perkins. (or see him on You Tube or other video sites)

Over 40 million dollars went to investigate Bill & Monica; while the 9/11 commission was being stonewalled on funding, eventually prying nine million from the Bush Administration. So where are our priorities?
Is it a wonder that distrust of the government grows day by day? When our government is complicit in some of the most heinous behavior, is it a wonder that false flag theories don't follow every crisis in which our liberties are threatened? So, keep working on your elbow Joe, and I'll keep that image of Mr.Parker "yukking it up" 24 hours after his child's murder.
And don't forget...next time..."whole hog and the postage"

Uhm, I would like to think that, if I was the governor of a state in a country that had seen multiple mass shootings increasing in frequency over the past 20 years, I would most certainly have discussed with my colleagues the possibility of something similar happening in my state.

Perhaps I've neglected to note discussion of this 'new' info repeatedly offered via msm: There were no 'long guns' found with the shooter at Sandy Hook. Only handguns. Four of them. Uhhh, but the chortling and, to my mind, rather creepy M.E. stated unequivocally that all wounds were from a 'long gun or rifle'. What?

The M.E. was made to appear creepy by selective editing of his press conference on Saturday 15th December. The video then proliferated on YouTube.

The 'official report' that four handguns were found on the dead shooter was retracted, along with around 30 other retractions of reports given to the media by individuals who appear to have been posing as 'law enforcement officials'.

There are many pieces left in the story, but it's true that the essential of it happened the way it was portrayed in the media. This kid was probably severely traumatized during childhood to the point of collpase. His moral compass seriously distorted. He provably coud have reached the point of total sensory deprivation. which is common in cases of mind control. You cannot use a human toy efficiently if you do not pervert the senses, the bio-survival circuit. The mind control techiniques are well-crafted, absolute and almost unidentifiable. It is sad that the mother used guns. This stirred more violence into the boy, but to reach that obnoxious level as to kill your own mother, one must be totally a psychopath. To the materialistic dialectics, this sounds like negation of negation..., although Hegel may have been distorted, i've read somewhere...

I'm really saddened by the tragic death of Aaron Swarz, a political activist fighting for freedom of information. He was so young and so bright, a light-bringer of truth.

As an aside, i like to point out that there are also inconsistencies in the shooting at the Aurora Cinema in Colorado, on July 20, 2012 by James Eagan Homes, a guy with an IQ of 192 who studied neuroscience at a top tier university. The trail was withheld for no justifiable reason, violating due process. Thankfully, it has been resumed. There seems to be some forces at play that are interested in keeping some information confidential for no apparent reason, otherwise things would be running smooth. This guy was obviously a psychopath nd probably a mind control subject too. I do not understand how a person with such remarkable IQ, committed this heinous crime. If he was about to get his doctorate degree in Neuroscience, how is it that he murdered these innocent people. Isn't Neuroscience about learning about how the mind works in order to enlighten humans to be more sane? This puts ino question the ethos of this science.

"But certainly for the present age, which prefers the sign to the thing signified, the copy to the original, representation to reality, the appearance to the essence... illusion only is sacred, truth profane. Nay, sacredness is held to be enhanced in proportion as truth decreases and illusion increases, so that the highest degree of illusion comes to be the highest degree of sacredness. "
Feuerbach, Preface to the second edition of The Essence of Christianity

Thank You for this beautifully written and articulate article. Since discovering SOTT a few months ago, I have been sharing quite a few of these articles on Facebook in the hopes of enlightening, or at least awakening a sense of bewilderment, in family and friends. Indeed this website, you and the other contributors,and the scattering of individuals abroad this nation and the world and fighting a very difficult battle. We cannot lose hope. We cannot give ground. We must continue to strive to reveal the nefarious machinations at work here and around the world.
Keep on with the good work! God Bless.

Regarding a few of the presumptions/assumptions of Robertom30, quote: " It's true that the essential of it happened the way it was portrayed in the media. This kid was probably severely traumatized during childhood to the point of collpase. His moral compass seriously distorted." and you 'know' this to be true.....how?

And again: " but to reach that obnoxious level as to kill your own mother, one must be totally a psychopath." what evidence has been presented to convince you....or anyone that Adam Lanza killed his mother? Mainstream news reported this as a fact but there is no evidence, no proof, no forensic report....merely a statement from officials that is then repeated ad nauseum via broadcasting. Do you just accept everything you're told is true without determining if the source of the information is reliable?

Regarding the "Aurora Shooter" you state: "This guy was obviously a psychopath and probably a mind control subject too."....there are more.... a lot more tentatively arrived at conclusions based on what? news broadcasts, other media...but again, essentially anecdotal evidence; no hard proof.

It appears that you are either phenomenally gullible or an inept disinfo dude who is sprinkling more dark side fairy dust to confuse and conflate.

The folks on this site are thinkers; people who read and listen and consider before deciding and, often, withholding their decisions until such time that actual provable data is provided. Thanks for your tidy summary of these two situations but....'no sale'.

Subcategories of newspeak included carefully crafted words created entirely and specifically for the purpose of a political agenda. According to Orwell, category ‘B’ words “consisted of words which had been deliberately constructed for political purposes.” These ‘B words’ often contain slogan like compound words creating snappy, happy conscious mind impressions while, at the same time, creating a subconscious mind impression containing contradiction; presenting the mind with a crisis of thought leading to confusion and anesthetization of critical thought. Critical thought being necessary to pull apart a tangled mess of contradictory messages and meanings.

One such phrase coined as a slogan-word is ‘gun control’. Gun control is a simple expression designed to ‘disarm’ critical thinking skills. ‘Gun control’ is phrase slogan-word which doesn’t map to a single definition, but rather maps to an endless parade of meanings, defocusing the conscious mind and tiring the unconscious mind.

Some of the children who survived the Sandy Hook school shooting recorded a version of Judy Garland’s song Over the Rainbow, one month after the massacre. In one big media event, these young children were brought to a recording studio and made to record the song, all under the never-ceasing clicks and flashes of cameras. They then went on to perform the song on Good Morning America. The song is now on sale iTunes and Amazon.
Sandy Hook Survivors Are Made to Sing “Over the Rainbow” to Commemorate the Shooting

While news sources describe this event as a “emotional healing process”, there are quite a few strange facts about this “event”. The most obvious one is: Why are these children being exposed to the public in such a way? Why are they pushed in mass media spotlight? Why are they in a recording studio with music industry people looking for publicity and made to sing a song that almost “embraces” what happened? Why isn’t this “healing process” happening in private, with friends and family? Why are iTunes and Amazon involved (yes, the song will be sold on these services for “charity” – the new word to justify exploitation)?
[Link]

Based on many articles describing the programming of people, adults and children, for mind control in the MK Ultra program, the song "Over The Rainbow" is described as a 'trigger' or some other form of 'signal' for conditioning.

The link above has some interesting comments at the end of the article....many, many folks apparently are aware of the significance of this song. So...if one considers the 'in your face' and blatant clues being pounded daily it appears that TPTB are essentially 'screwing with us'. It's utterly perverse. Somewhat like "yeah, we know you know and you are impotent...furthermore, trying to explain this anyone who hasn't read about it marks one as a 'conspiracy nut'....or just a nut. It's truly diabolical.

Exactly, Callisto! You hit the nail on the head for that one. I cringe every time I see that picture of the "owl" drawing by the Sandy Hook kids and Anderson Cooper holding it up on national TV! Molech would be proud! LoL!

Molech? As in Alex Jones and the Canaanites at the Bohemian Grove? People don't still give credence to that do they?

As for 'Over the Rainbow', the evidence that the children were "made to sing it", and that their singing it is somehow a shout-out to fellow mind-controller buddies, amounts to a claim that among the movies used in Monarch programming was The Wizard of Oz.

Of course we give credence to it. There really is a 40 ft tall stone owl statue at the Grove. They really burn effigies at ceremonies in front of it like at a sacrifice. Its also true that elites like the Bush family attend and participate in the events there. Daddy Bush even has a cap from the Grove that he often wore in public, too. lol

Just because Jones was involved in getting video of the event doesn't negate the fact that what goes on at BG is considered by lots of people to be similar to satan worship. Like Callisto said, its diabolical!

[AUTHOR'S PREFACE: I originally wanted to place this comment on the blogtalkradio page in response to today's SOTT Talk Radio broadcast, but as I do not have a Big Brother-monitoring Facebook account, I elected to insert it here...]

Joe (& Niall)-
Excellent radio show today - thanks very much for this as well as all the brilliant work you're doing.

One thought that arose while listening (I believe the thought was sparked by Joe's remarking on the topic of the Controllers' need/wish/demand/hunger as reflected in the movie "V for Vendetta" that the mass populace must constantly see how much they need us, their leaders) is the relevancy of Lisa Guliani"s thesis put forth in The Dot Connector magazine, Issue 1, Jan - Feb 2009, namely that the U.S exists, not as a republic or a democratic country, but as a Corporation (Issues 1 and 2 are currently available as $0 transactions from http://www.thedotconnector.org/mag/index.php?_a=category&cat_id=2).

The relevancy of Lisa's article is tied in with the countless atrocities manifesting from the gross underbelly of the worldwide pathocracy/corporatocracy that infests this planet; and, in particular with one of the pathocratic machine's favorite tools, the false flag event.

The Sandy Hook Tragedy, being one of these false flag operations, is a recent textbook example of the perverted means used to carry out the pathocrats' hidden objectives or agendas, one of which is to inject more of the fear-based, psychopathic control virus into mass consciousness (to make the predator's mind our mind and thereby propagate the virus even further).

But, also, in a sick, perverted way, these false flags are preconceived and carefully orchestrated operations ("psy-ops") played out on the world stage as clues to indicate that we (at least the U.S. citizens, perhaps even the world's citizens, if the C's are correct in stating that the Consortium, Control System, "New World Order" already exists and has existed for quite some time) are technically owned under the farce known as International Law, and therefore as powerless as slaves on a global plantation.

In this article, Lisa brilliantly exposes one extremely shocking (in my mind, as a U.S. Citizen well-versed in so-called American history), aspect of the Consortium, namely that the U.S. Congress, during 1871, in the wake of the debilitating economic conditions prevailing after the Civil War, basically sold the country out to international bankers primarily based in Europe.

From that time forward, the U.S. was essentially emasculated as an independent country and subsumed, as a corporate entity into a larger, more all-encompassing "Corporatocracy" reflecting private interests (i.e., the Consortium's interests) having global reach.

Also, we mustn't discount, beside the typically used Consortium strategy of launching the Hegelian "problem-reaction-solution" false flags, the other oft-used strategy of diversion (look over here because we don't want you to look over there).

For instance, look over here at the Sandy Hook tragedy - don't look over there at Israel's ongoing, genocidal atrocities against the Palestinians.

Or look over here on the ground in Newtown, Connecticut, but don't look up at the sky and wonder about the increasing number of fireball events.

Or heaven forbid, don't look at increasing food prices and/or the increase in food scarcity (we'll let you see and experience more of that later when you'll plead for us to really nail the coffin lid shut on your illusions of freedom).

Oh, by the way, if you suffer from "plagues," we'll help you (you need us, right?). We have the vaccines and the food you so badly need. We even have shelters specially designed for your safety. (Never you mind the fact that the food is GMO'd, the vaccines are DNA-crippling, and there is razor wire surrounding your new encampment - it's all for your own protection)...

Anyway, I know the above is pretty verbose, but hopefully it makes sense...

The question of "why" always intrigued me. There always is a "why" if you look deep enough.... And it's not gun control, although that is one of the hot buttons, or the murder of children which is also one of the hot buttons....

At the begining when all the information was coming out of mainstream media and alternative media I was thinking about what a total circus it was and how easy it would be for alternative media sites and conspiracy theorists themselves to jump on the bandwagon and get taken for a ride. I haven't changed my opinion. I still think that alternative web sites (those that aren't controlled by "agents") are the targets. You (and all people who tell the truth) are the targets, with a side bet against survivalists and alternative lifestylers.

What they are trying to do is to get "ordinary" people to turn against you, as evidenced by that last caller to the show.

So, that's the who, the what and the why of the psyops target. In my opinion, anyway.

Regarding what Callisto has just said: As you've just pointed out, these are assumptions. I'm just assuming until proven otherwise. I don't own the media, so i don't know for sure whether Lanza really killed his mother or whether those children really were murdered by him. Sometimes the media lies, but the media a highly complex medium made up of a big cohort of journalists and police. All of them work together to put out what they consider "the truth". Since they're all individuals with some level of education in order to get to this position, i assume that they have some level ethics and compromise with what they do, that somehow they care a bit nd can relate to human suffering, otherwise they would be unable to move people emotional body if they were totally aloof, nobody would believe them. What i'm just saying is that simply because The media says something, we shouldn't repeatedly dismiss it as lie, let's not throw the baby with the bath water. The media is very intricate and as i've just said it's compromised of individuals with some level of empahty and some of them with religous circumspection, which does not boils down to assuming everything in this box is false. It's better to do your own research first and as i've just said no one hold the absolute truth. We have to take everything with grainssss of salt even what the media say and even the sometimes overwhelming assumption that media always lie. This only upsets the apple cart of our emotional body, which tamps down on critical thought.
So, please do not take my words for it. I've just gleaning information from "reputable" various sources such as abc, cnn, ny times.... Mainstream media. I seem to remember that it's been remarked that 99% of relgious beliefs are true, but it is the remaining tiny 1% which wreaks havoc. As to the Aurora shooting, i say the same thing.

As to Pavlink, I've personally seen this double talk and puns many times in my life. I personally feel unease upon first hearing them, because they fireup many contradictory feelings in onself, which seriously disrupsts critical thinking, the judy garland song "over the rainbow" is said to contained many of these hooks which connects you with things you may not like at face value. The problem with this lies in the cognitive dissonance in triggers in the indiviuals, hampering the unifying aspect of the mind. As Alfred Korzybsky remarked words can have multi-ordinal coordinates, what's wrong with it is the "Is" of identity.

Thank you for your polite response to my comment however, try as I might, I'm unable to follow your 'logic'. It appears that you wish to convey several concepts or 'truths' in your efforts but, for me, the end result is boggle.

I wish you well and hope that your belief in the ethics and empathy of the mainstream media is proved out. It appears that you truly need to believe this and I have no overwhelming wish to cause you difficulty in maintaining your position.

Sandy Hook actors, robots, androids, television creations
[Link]I have no ax to grind here. The people who honestly conclude that Sandy Hook was one great hoax from the beginning and no one died; the people who conclude that Lanza was the patsy for professionals who did the killing at Sandy Hook Elementary School; the people who believe Lanza was the killer driven over the edge by psychiatric drugs: the people who believe the Sandy Hook killings were a secret-society operation or a black-ops horror designed to grab the guns of Americans; all these people will continue to explore their paths and they will unearth important information.

What I’m offering here is a perspective on how much of what we see is delivered to us through the twisted dehumanized lens of television, presented as if it is the whole picture and the whole story.

In Sandy Hook, what still remains off-camera, never seen, never mentioned, never named, never broadcast, never permitted to find the light of day? The answer is: whatever is spontaneously alive, whatever exceeds a simple series of machined reflexes.

The great goal of media and its controllers is mechanical reduction, so populations will accept whatever seems “more efficient,” more ordered, more systematic, more bureaucratic, more automatic, more predictable, more repetitive.

With that as the merciless foundation, the population will accept whatever comes down from the top as a command. The actual content of the command is unimportant.

I believe before we all jump to conclusions we should consider that the investigation for Sandy Hook is most likely still being conducted. It would be incredibly ridiculous to assume that all available information has been made public knowledge at this point, nor should it be.

I find a delicious irony in the above post: the "jumping to conclusions" alluded to, if any, were made by the officials, the media and the witnesses. To wit: Adam Lanza was the shooter; the black Honda was Adam Lanza's mother's car; the children were all shot with a long rifle/handgun/shotgun; Nancy Lanza was a teacher at the school ad infinitum.

Any remarks by posters to this site have been, for the most part, not statements of fact but queries regarding the lack of facts and offerings of multiple 'facts' by the officials. Far from jumping to conclusions, the efforts of the posters on this site have been the opposite; an attempt to discern the actual truth from the misleading, contradicting information provided by the spokespersons and the media.

As for available information that has not been made public and, this poster's assertion that it should not be, why not? The grisly facts have been trotted out for our digestion, the alleged survivors have been interviewed, profiled, the dead memorialized to an absurd degree. What 'available information' should be withheld from the public? And why? For our own good? To quell rage or panic or perhaps, prevent sensible individuals from furthering their efforts to finally establish what actually occurred?

Thank you very much for accepting my viewpoint. Personally, i do not like holding beliefs in anything. I find that if something is actually true, you don't have to hold it, it will bear on its own. What the mainstream media offers are no more than maps of reality and the menu is not the food. Anyway, thanks you.