The combat system looks bland, the graphics are meh tier... I can see literally no reason to play this unless it was an MMO.I like the idea of it, sure, complete and total freedom, but the lack of a proper story and no multiplayer will give it barely any replay value imo.Just my two cents.

The combat system looks bland, the graphics are meh tier... I can see literally no reason to play this unless it was an MMO.I like the idea of it, sure, complete and total freedom, but the lack of a proper story and no multiplayer will give it barely any replay value imo.Just my two cents.

This is entirely my opinion, I stated that.And yes, I know that it's aimed at singleplayer, please reread what I said.Yes, I KNOW that it isn't out yet and that it is just speculation, please reread what I said.Dammit why is Steam full of so many idiots.

This is entirely my opinion, I stated that.And yes, I know that it's aimed at singleplayer, please reread what I said.Yes, I KNOW that it isn't out yet and that it is just speculation, please reread what I said.Dammit why is Steam full of so many idiots.

The combat seems slow and the game looks like one published years ago. I see your point here. BUT it's indie, it's low-budget. What do you expect? The graphics may seem old but are not bad. It's fitting and from what I saw in the videos it's well done regarding decoration - it's not "empty". I prefer that over super-realistic high-end graphics.

Also to many people RPGs are nothing about graphics and action-combat. At least for me i's about game-mechanics, freedom, story (And personally I see one here - of course I can't say or sur) and a world to "live" in.

From what I experienced the past years great graphics seldoms make a good game because most "great" games focus on that rather than gameplay...

The combat system looks bland, the graphics are meh tier... I can see literally no reason to play this unless it was an MMO.I like the idea of it, sure, complete and total freedom, but the lack of a proper story and no multiplayer will give it barely any replay value imo.Just my two cents.

Wrong, look at the gameplay videos, theres a producer in sexy poses interrupting the video so it'll definitley have replay value.

I would much rather sacrifice graphics for an better/longer game. I pre ordered Tomb Raider 2013, and altho I had a blast playing it, it took me LESS then 48 hours to complete it. Yes I completed it to 100%. That is friggin ridiculous. If graphics are of lower quality it potentially means longer story lines. I, for one, can't wait to see this game hit Steam.

i dont know how anyone can review a game before playing.but hey,why comment if your not interested.why just not leave the discussion to people who wish to play the game..seems to me like you are deliberatley trying to bait people Pebsie..it may not be the case..i for one am sick of spending money on big game developers that dont deliver.i am glad to help fund this game..it may turn out has you say and not be very good..but here's the thing..cant be any worse than the money i have wasted over the yrs..i say gl to dreamatrix.

This is entirely my opinion, I stated that.And yes, I know that it's aimed at singleplayer, please reread what I said.Yes, I KNOW that it isn't out yet and that it is just speculation, please reread what I said.Dammit why is Steam full of so many idiots.