Category: retro

Even the enlightened ones that understand that vaccines are crap are missing the boat.

For example, Judy A. Mikovits is one of the many ARV military leaders. She helped lead the war on AIDS using chemical weapons.

ARV is Anti Retro Virus. She along with others have killed my friends with this ARV garbage.

Her pioneering work during a twenty year career at the National Cancer Institute includes the discovery of the modulation of DNA Methylation machinery by human retro viral infection and the development of the concept of inflammatory cytokines and chemokine signatures of infection and disease, which was first published in 1999, when Dr. Mikovits directed the Laboratory of Antiviral Drug Mechanisms in developing therapeutics and diagnostics for HIV/AIDS and AIDS associated malignancies. Therapies which are still standard of care twenty five years later and credited with saving millions of deaths from HIV/AIDS. In 2001, she moved back to industry where she directed the Cancer Biology program of EpiGenX Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Mikovits directed the Laboratory of Antiviral Drug Mechanisms in developing therapeutics and diagnostics for HIV/AIDS and AIDS associated malignancies. Therapies which are still standard of care twenty five years later and credited with saving millions of deaths from HIV/AIDS. In 2001, she moved back to industry where she directed the Cancer Biology program of EpiGenX Pharmaceuticals. – http://www.plaguethebook.com/judy-a.-mikovits–phd.html

Image snapshot from http://bolenreport.com/court-awards-2-5-million-vaccine-critic-dr-mark-geier/ on February 9, 2018

Trying to make sense of medical terminology is like trying to make sense of the flat earth theory and the conspiracy think that man never LOTM (Landed On The Moon) but let’s look at what CPANEL says about things that are RETRO.

As we notice in the image on the left it is a current version that is widely used. The one on the right is a RETRO version. They look different but mostly function the exact same way.

Hmmmmm.

Things that look different can act the same way?

So what you are telling me is that a virus that was created in the 1980’s that is constantly mutating can look different than one that is made in the 2017’s?

That means that the test kit that was made in 1999 and designed to find viruses that look a certain way cannot recognize one that looks another way correct?

Or is it that these test kits find how they act?

Good?

I just said “good question” FYI.

HIV is said to be a retrovirus.

It’s also said to be a virus, that’s just because it’s easier to say and a retrovirus is a subset of the broader term virus.

Technically the label should then, to be more precise, be HIR.

Even better would be to use HIDR (Human Immune Deficiency Retrovirus) as it’s also said to hide.

So does that trap of a test kit actually determine how the thing acts? Let’s say it does, then what does it matter how it looks?

There can be 500 changes in how CPANEL looks over the years, and then many of those are RETRO, all acting the same way.

Then again, there can be changes where the CPANEL looks the same yet acts a different way.

Oh there goes that monkey throwing wrenches into everything again.

Monkey see monkey figure out things better than doctors and $ientists.

Apparently the tests look for how they look, basically finding a glass with liquid in it.

The tests find antibodies in the most general of shapes. They can be from a flu, a cold, an infection of a zillion kinds or HIV.

They are not precise. They are no more precise than satellite imagery finding a drink. What’s in the drink is a whole different story.

What the drink does and how it gets anywhere is like creating a blockbuster Hollywood film, the devil’s in the details, the processes of figuring all that out is not at all possibly by simply looking at the glass.

Antibodies, what the test finds, are like what we see here.

Testing by appearance does not tell us if there’s a sexual proclivity drug in any of them.

Thus one way to avoid rape is by not drinking from glasses and one way to avoid confusion is to not necessarily believe that a picture is worth 3 words – Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

Feature image of 3 glass with something in them is in the public domain as shown here https://static.pexels.com/photos/162480/glasses-ice-cubes-illuminated-drink-162480.jpeg

CPANEL snapshot of a way to “change style” found under “preferences” from a standard website administration area.

Actually it’s not a pay phone, but an image of a pay phone embossed into plastic in the shape of a cover for an iPhone.

Real pay phones have gone the way of the dodo.

Let’s make a call on this retro phone case cover.

Call did not go through.

There are a couple of reasons for this.

This is a phone cover, it’s not a real phone

This is retro phone image

Things that are retro are not the original nor can do what the original did.

Elvis was a real person up until 1977 when he died. Now everything we see of him looking alive is retro. Not the same. Cannot do the same thing yet sometimes looks eerily similar.

This brings us to understanding HIV which is technically a RETRO/VIRUS.

This cannot at all do what the original virus did.

If you doubt this, then as soon as you make a call to your doctor or HIV scientist on this pay phone and get through, I will believe that you have been told correctly that retroviruses have the ability to do the same thing as original viruses.

I will need to hear proof of the call to believe you.

The answering party can babble all they want as they have for 30 centuries now about how HIV has the ability to bla bla bla, that’s fine, just as long as they get through on this retro phone.

Another point is that people may have this phone cover to fool people into believing that they are actually using a pay phone. This may fool some of the people some of the time, or all of the HIV cult fans all of the time, but like with the concept tha HIV (a retrovirus) has any ability to make a call to a cell and say “Hey fucker I’m going to destroy you” is about as absurd as asking this pay phone to make a call to have some service guy come to your home to repair your land line where this pay phone is connected.

Maybe you could use this to place a call to the 1980’s like the HIV cult would have you believe is possible with retro viruses which are HARM/LESS.

What’s amazing to hear when you make a non-retro phone call today on the internet, is how skewed science on this matter has become. Even Wikipedia has retrovirology wrong.

At one time the father of retrovirology Peter Duesberg was well respected by those in his class, but since AIDS hysteria took hold long ago, as with climate science that supposedly has 98% of all scientists in agreement, the majority of science has turned against him regardless of how mixed up their theories have mutated.

Yet his arguments are the only ones that stand the test of solid logic. It’s like claiming that George Washington had it all wrong.