The article is about as well written as the original headline, leading me to suspect that subby has submitted his own blog entry.

I read the article and can only say that you can't blame the writer for one's lack of reading comprehension. It's quite understandable. Anyway, about the content of the story, this is just another Obama administration screwup that libs are trying to say is OK. Three more years of this crap.

skullkrusher:jaytkay: "...according to the Washington Examiner and a host of media sources..."

[imageshack.us image 250x272]

it's like a badge of honor for you guys. Amazing.

To weigh the merits of the source before making judgment to better ensure that the information we're considering isn't tantamount to the testimony of a third grader that claims to be good friends with Sasquatch. Yeah, kinda.

Doctor Funkenstein:skullkrusher: jaytkay: "...according to the Washington Examiner and a host of media sources..."

[imageshack.us image 250x272]

it's like a badge of honor for you guys. Amazing.

To weigh the merits of the source before making judgment to better ensure that the information we're considering isn't tantamount to the testimony of a third grader that claims to be good friends with Sasquatch. Yeah, kinda.

not really - actually, what a thinking person does is find facts to refute the information. What you do is pretend the information doesn't exist because it is from a biased source.It doesn't make the information go away nor does it make it any more or less true.

It hurts to admit that the progressive leadership is as dirty as the GOP. The worst part must be that they never pass any law that actually takes money from the rich and gives to the poor. Look at Obama care. The 1% are not impacted to the extent that the middle class person is. Why is that? Could it be that they work for the same masters as the GOP? I think so.

skullkrusher:jaytkay: "...according to the Washington Examiner and a host of media sources..."

[imageshack.us image 250x272]

it's like a badge of honor for you guys. Amazing.

If we took every self referencing story from the echo chamber seriously we'd be stuck in a vortex of derp. There's nothing wrong with ignoring a "story" until it references reputable sources and loses the quotes.

skullkrusher:Doctor Funkenstein: skullkrusher: jaytkay: "...according to the Washington Examiner and a host of media sources..."

[imageshack.us image 250x272]

it's like a badge of honor for you guys. Amazing.

To weigh the merits of the source before making judgment to better ensure that the information we're considering isn't tantamount to the testimony of a third grader that claims to be good friends with Sasquatch. Yeah, kinda.

not really - actually, what a thinking person does is find facts to refute the information. What you do is pretend the information doesn't exist because it is from a biased source.It doesn't make the information go away nor does it make it any more or less true.

The problem is that the conservative media empire keeps using itself to independently corroborate stories that turn out to be bogus. And this has been going of for years.

bigsteve3OOO:It hurts to admit that the progressive leadership is as dirty as the GOP. The worst part must be that they never pass any law that actually takes money from the rich and gives to the poor. Look at Obama care. The 1% are not impacted to the extent that the middle class person is. Why is that? Could it be that they work for the same masters as the GOP? I think so.

There isn't any "progressive" leaders in the Congress... except maybe Bernie Sanders. That's why constant cries of "socialism" are so pathetic. No one wants a socialistic society in the U.S., and that includes Sanders. Intelegent social programs, yes, Socialism or Socialism by force (Communism), no.

d23:bigsteve3OOO: It hurts to admit that the progressive leadership is as dirty as the GOP. The worst part must be that they never pass any law that actually takes money from the rich and gives to the poor. Look at Obama care. The 1% are not impacted to the extent that the middle class person is. Why is that? Could it be that they work for the same masters as the GOP? I think so.

There isn't any "progressive" leaders in the Congress... except maybe Bernie Sanders. That's why constant cries of "socialism" are so pathetic. No one wants a socialistic society in the U.S., and that includes Sanders. Intelegent social programs, yes, Socialism or Socialism by force (Communism), no.

verbal_jizm:skullkrusher: jaytkay: "...according to the Washington Examiner and a host of media sources..."

[imageshack.us image 250x272]

it's like a badge of honor for you guys. Amazing.

If we took every self referencing story from the echo chamber seriously we'd be stuck in a vortex of derp. There's nothing wrong with ignoring a "story" until it references reputable sources and loses the quotes.

unless, of course, it is a story you like, then no reputable references required to take at face value

skullkrusher:Doctor Funkenstein: skullkrusher: jaytkay: "...according to the Washington Examiner and a host of media sources..."

[imageshack.us image 250x272]

it's like a badge of honor for you guys. Amazing.

To weigh the merits of the source before making judgment to better ensure that the information we're considering isn't tantamount to the testimony of a third grader that claims to be good friends with Sasquatch. Yeah, kinda.

not really - actually, what a thinking person does is find facts to refute the information. What you do is pretend the information doesn't exist because it is from a biased source.It doesn't make the information go away nor does it make it any more or less true.

So go find us the "host of media sources" reporting this story and show how they independently confirmed the facts.