Barack Obama received more than 99% of the vote in more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio on election day. In fact, there were a substantial number of precincts where Mitt Romney got exactly zero votes. So how in the world did this happen? Third world dictators dont even get 99% of the vote.

What makes all of this even more alarming is that there were reports of voting machine problems during early voting in Ohio. It was being reported that some voters were claiming that they tried to vote for Romney but that the voting machines kept recording their votes as votes for Obama

Without paper ballots and diligent monitoring, there is nothing to trace re: election results. I don't trust computers for elections; they're too easy to hack and are prone to malfunction, as we've read about in numerous instances across America.

First number is total, second are those claiming Hispanic or Latino affiliation.

For the entire ward, it appears that blacks outnumber whites 20:3, so it should not be mindblowing for one of those precincts to be majority black and with blacks polling 95% for Obama/Biden resulting on 0 or a handful of votes for Romney/Ryan.

Without paper ballots and diligent monitoring, there is nothing to trace re: election results. I don't trust computers for elections; they're too easy to hack and are prone to malfunction, as we've read about in numerous instances across America. I trust American elections as much as I trust Russian elections, which isn't saying much. We deserve better.

Without paper ballots and diligent monitoring, there is nothing to trace re: election results. I don't trust computers for elections; they're too easy to hack and are prone to malfunction, as we've read about in numerous instances across America. I trust American elections as much as I trust Russian elections, which isn't saying much. We deserve better.

Click to expand...

Were eletronic/computerized voting machines used in Cayahoga Co.? What do they have to do with the demographics and polling in precincts like Cleaveland 2-Q that I analyzed in post #2?

No doubt there are questionable results, but voter fraud is not proven by questionable findings.
Assyrian: UN neutral? They know who will give them more of what they want. The UN is more liberal then most Americans, more liberal then Obama in his first term. (Waiting to see the change now that he can be himself.)

Assyrian: UN neutral? They know who will give them more of what they want. The UN is more liberal then most Americans, more liberal then Obama in his first term. (Waiting to see the change now that he can be himself.)

Click to expand...

Apart from the Muslim world and the remains of the communist block, the rest of the world is more liberal than most Americans, it isn't our fault you lurched so far to the right. But if you want to request UN monitors from any of the western democracies I am sure you would find them keen to ensure the American people have their fair say in a democratic election no matter how strange the choice might be. Take Ireland, 96% in favour of Obama, but we would be much more interested in watching for voter suppression or gerrymandering, having see how the Catholic vote was suppressed in northern Ireland before the troubles.