Last Exorcism gets a sequel??? So it wasn't The Last Exorcism, was it? They could've at least made it a prequel and called it The Second Last Exorcism. That way The Last Exorcism would still have been the last.

I thought The Last Exorcism was a superb little horror and one of the more effective hand-held camera movies. However, I'm not sure it needs a sequel, and if it does get one then that means it is in danger of becoming another dull horror franchise!

The title of The Last Exorcism surely refered to it being the last exorcism for one specific character in the film (trying not to spoil to much here). If that character is not in this film then I see no problem to making a sequel to a film with "last" in the title. Although we probably don't need a sequel to Last Exit To Brooklyn!

Imho the last exorcism was a decent little horror. Not surprised about a sequel but it could go in a totally different direction if they carry on with (spoilers) the cult and what could happen with the baby

Imho the last exorcism was a decent little horror. Not surprised about a sequel but it could go in a totally different direction if they carry on with (spoilers) the cult and what could happen with the baby

Imho the last exorcism was a decent little horror. Not surprised about a sequel but it could go in a totally different direction if they carry on with (spoilers) the cult and what could happen with the baby

The Exorcist nailed the subject of Exorcism so well that every movie that has come after it has just copied most of what happened in Blatty's book and Friedkin's film (even the photo here of bodily distortion is just a rip-off of Regan's spinning head and spider walk)