Courtney Conlogue has claimed victory at the Outerknown Fiji Women's Pro in pumping conditions at Cloudbreak. The overhead waves provided the perfect setting for the final against Hawaii's Tatiana Weston-Webb.

A worker for the San Bernadino County Public Health Department Attacked his co-workers at Christmas Party

at Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, Calif. The Christmas party was so offensive to Syed Rizwan Farook that he left the party went home and got his wife Tashfeen Malik and returned to the party blasting with assault rifles.

Was Syed a sleeper terrorist?

What we know so far about those who lost their lives at the Inland Regional Center:

SAN BERNARDINO, Calif. — Two people dressed in tactical gear and
carrying assault-style weapons shot and killed 14 people and injured
another 17 at a social services center on Wednesday before being fatally
shot by police hours later while on the run.

San Bernardino Police Chief Jarrod Burguan said a tip led police to a
home in the nearby city of Redlands, where officers saw the suspects
leave in a dark SUV. Police pursued and fired on the SUV, killing one
male and female suspect.

Burguan said a third person was seen running away from the SUV and
was later taken into custody, but it’s unclear whether that person had a
connection to the shooting.

One officer sustained non-life threatening injuries in the confrontation.

It is hard to believe the public law that authorized AIDS
will be thirty one years old next week. Even more remarkable, that in a score
and a half, no one has ever read it!

On March 16, 1970, following significant world events both in
medicine and politics, President Richard Milhouse Nixon signed into law the
U.S. policy to protect America’s future by “stabilizing” the
population of Sub-Sahara Africa. The history leading to the politics is
relevant in our further presentation of the “research logic” Flow Chart of the federal virus
program.

On April 4, 1969, President Richard Nixon did not want to be late.
He had been there many times before, but today was special. He wanted the
scientific and medical communities from around the world to hear and see his
presence as our military scientists and doctors announced, ‘they could
effectively make AIDS.’ It was Fort Detrick, Maryland and the ethnic nature of
the work would not be printed until November ’70.

Unbeknownst to the American people, the Special Virus program had
been underway since November, 1961. In a real sense, the current trillion
dollar ‘tax’ “give back” to U.S. taxpayers, is in essence the benefit
of our sharpened ability to kill humans for a better tomorrow for our financial
investment in our trust in God.

The 1971 Flow Chart proves the United States sought to co-mingle
animal viruses (Visna) that had never before been seen in human disease. Thus,
at what point did the population projections of Africa necessitate this
“long standing secret virus program?” It appears that shortly after
WW2, and the importation of the German (Operation Paperclip) and Japanese biological
experts, the U.S. State Department wrote a top secret memo under the pen of
George W. McKennan. The United States knew in 1948 it had to ‘devise a
scheme’ to implant the German Visna in the human population and assist
the Black population in copulating itself into extinction.

Why? Why? Why would the ‘so-called’ greatest
“people-oriented” country in the history of the world have an Oz-like
curtain behind which reveals a twisted, evil social structure so contrary to
the very fabric of the core Constitutional foundations?

As Zbigniev Brezinski says in his classic 1978 National Security
Council Memorandum #46: “Africa’s resources remain our “highest
priority””! (Translation: If we allow the Africans to use of all
their own diamonds and gold, we won’t have anything physical to show that we
are not available for sex for others.)

So what we have done over the last fifty three years is come up
with a way to make it appear that Africa’s people are “sexually
nasty”. Thus African deaths are palatable. These people are dying solely
because of their behavior. Sort of the same thing that happened to homosexuals.

In other words, we are going to secretly make AIDS and not tell
you, so if you never stray from ‘monogamous missionary’, you won’t have
anything to worry about. Yeah, yeah, mr. government, please give us more
concocted social skills tests that end in state death. Even though you can’t
see it now, we will all be crucified.

But as it was, Nixon helicoptered back down to the Wh— House and
got busy. They were going to do it. No more White on White crime, we are going
to get those darkies. Adolph was wrong, why check for foreskins to determine
who your enemy is when you need only look toward his (face).

Wasting no time to get to waste Blacks, in May 1969, Nixon
authorized the United Nations Association of the United States of America to
issue the first of the U.S. policy decisions carving out a U.S future world
with Africa’s resources void her people.

On June 9, The Pentagon informed the U.S. Congress and presto,
there it is. The trickster’s manifesto as to why we would quickly need
something like AIDS (which we had just made).

President Nixon’s “Special Message to the Congress on
Problems of Population Growth” 7/18/69 is the crown jewel of the ideology
of eugenics and racism. Again, though, who could possibly have known and have
been able to see through this government matrix? Reflect back that we were
distracted frequently throughout the entire decade of the 60’s and 70’s.
Kennedy, King, Kennedy (KKK) and Vietnam.

A very strong case builds that the desire to introduce Visna
(wasting) into humans is the direct result of the true tilt of the
ethnic/social landscape to the detriment of racial and social minorities.

With Nixon’s law authorizing eugenics czar, John D. Rockefeller,
III to lead the charge to cull the Black population, the U.S. Congress is
dog-tied from citizen overview of the Population Commission
(“COMMISSION”). AIDS is official U.S. policy. However, it is only
outlined until the end of the 20th Century. Our call for review is just, it is
our union which is imperfect.

Join our petition call for immediate review of the 1971 Flow Chart and 15 progress reports
of the U.S. federal virus program, the Special Virus.

I have the honor to transmit for your consideration the Final
Report, containing the findings and recommendations, of the Commission on
Population Growth and the American Future, pursuant to Sec. 8, PL 91-213.

After two years of concentrated effort, we have concluded that, in
the long run, no substantial benefits will result from further growth of the
Nation’s population, rather that the gradual stabilization of our population
through voluntary means would contribute significantly to the Nation’s ability
to solve its problems. We have looked for, and have not found, any convincing
economic argument for continued population growth. The health of our country
does not depend on it, nor does the vitality of business nor the welfare of the
average person.

The recommendations offered by this Commission are directed
towards increasing public knowledge of the causes and please=””
acknowledge=”” and consequences of population change, facilitating
and guiding the processes of population movement, maximizing information about
human reproduction and its consequences for the family, and enabling
individuals to avoid unwanted fertility.

To these ends we offer this report in the hope that our findings
and recommendations will stimulate serious consideration of an issue that is of
great consequence to present and future generations.

“In
the 1950s, the Rockefellers reorganized the U.S. eugenics movement in their own
family offices, with spinoff world population control and abortion groups. The
Eugenics Society changed its name to the Society for the Study of Social
Biology, its current name. “The Rockefeller Foundation had long financed the
eugenics movement in England, apparently repaying Britain for the fact that
British capital and an Englishman-partner had started old John D. Rockefeller
out in his Oil Trust. “In the 1960s, the Eugenics Society of England adopted
what they called Crypto-eugenics, stating in their official reports that they
would do eugenics through means and instruments not labeled as eugenics. “With
support from the Rockefellers, the Eugenics Society (England) set up a
sub-committee called the International Planned Parenthood Federation, which for
12 years had no other address than the Eugenics Society. This, then, is the
private, international apparatus which has set the world up for a global
holocaust, under the UN flag.” –

Investigate
the AIDS, world population control connection… “July 1, 1970—Senate Appropriations
hearings are held for the Department of Defense and refer to eminent biologists
who believe that within 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a
synthetic biological agent (infective micro-organism), an agent that does not
naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.
“Hearings in the British House of Commons from April 8 to May 13, 1987
regarding AIDS will include the following: “Every biological scientist who has
dispassionately studied the virus and the epidemic knows that the origins of
the virus could lie in the developments of modern biology….Some who know
perfectly well what has happened are deliberately fudging scientific data to
keep the heat off them and fellow members of their molecular biological
‘club’.” –

“In fact, it (the HIV virus) is created by a scientist for
biological warfare at an Army research facility in MD. Why has there been so
much secrecy about AIDS? When you ask where did the virus come from, it raises
a lot of flags. That makes me suspicious.” – Wangari Maatha
of Kenya, first African woman to win the Nobel Peace Prize

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1970 HEARINGS
BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS FIRST SESSION SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEPARTMENT
OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS H.B. 15090 PART 5 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT,
TEST, AND EVALUATION Department of the Army Statement of Director, Advanced
Research Project Agency Statement of Director, Defense Research and Engineering
Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING
OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1969 UNITED STATES SENATE LIBRARY [pg.] 129 TUESDAY, JULY
1, 1969 SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENTS There are two things about the biological
agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological
surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and
eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be
possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not
naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired. MR.
SIKES. Are we doing any work in that field? DR. MACARTHUR. We are not. MR.
SIKES. Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest? DR. MACARTHUR. Certainly not
lack of interest. MR. SIKES. Would you provide for our records information on
what would be required, what the advantages of such a program would be, the
time and the cost involved? DR. MACARTHUR. We will be very happy to. (The
information follows:) The dramatic progress being made in the field of
molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of science
to biological warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and
provided the following observations: 1. All biological agents up the the
present time are representatives of naturally occurring disease, and are thus
known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to
qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purposes. 2.
Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective
microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known
disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be
refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend
to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease. 3. A research
program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately
5 years at a total cost of $10 million. 4. It would be very difficult to
establish such a program. Molecular biology is a relatively new science. There
are not many highly competent scientists in the field. Almost all are in
university laboratories, and they are generally adequately supported from
sources other than DOD. However, it was considered possible to initiate an
adequate program through the National Academy of Sciences – National Research
Council (NAS-NRC). The matter was discussed with the NAS-NRC, and tentative
plans were plans were made to initiate the program. However decreasing funds in
CB, growing criticism of the CB program, and our reluctance to involve the
NAS-NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the
past 2 years. It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe
such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to yet another method of
massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure
scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of
the ways it could be done, there is little that can be done to devise defensive
measures. Should an enemy develop it, there is little doubt that this is an
important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there
is no adequate research program. Funded for $10,000 000 12/8/69 (306 yes votes
330-no votes 33)

On May 11, 1987, The London Times, one of the world’s
most respected newspapers, published an explosive article entitled,
“Smallpox vaccine triggered AIDS virus.” The story suggested the
smallpox eradication vaccine program sponsored by the WHO was responsible for
unleashing AIDS in Africa. Almost 100 million Africans living in central Africa
were inoculated by the WHO. The vaccine was held responsible for awakening a
“dormant” AIDS virus infection on the continent.

An advisor to the WHO admitted, “Now I believe
the smallpox vaccine theory is the explanation for the explosion of AIDS.”
Robert Gallo, M,D., the co-discoverer of HIV, told The Times, “The link
between the WHO program and the epidemic is an interesting and important
hypothesis. I cannot say that it actually happened, but I have been saying for
some years that the use of live vaccines such as that used for smallpox can
activate a dormant infection such as HIV.” Despite the tremendous
importance of this story, the U.S. media was totally silent on the report, and
Gallo never spoke of it again.

In September 1987, at a conference sponsored by the
National Health Federation in Monrovia, California, William Campbell Douglass,
M.D., bluntly blamed the WHO for murdering Africa with the AIDS virus. In a
widely circulated reprint of his talk entitled “W.H.O. Murdered
Africa” , he accused the organization of encouraging virologists and
molecular biologists to work with deadly animal viruses in an attempt to make
an immunosuppressive hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans. From the
Bulletin of the World Health Organization (Volume 47, p.259, 1972), he quoted a
passage that stated: “An attempt should be made to see if viruses can in
fact exert selective effects on immune function. The possibility should be looked
into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired if the
infecting virus damages, more or less selectively, the cell responding to the
virus.” According to Douglass, “That’s AIDS. What the WHO is saying
in plain English is Let’s cook up a virus that selectively destroys the T-cell
system of man, an acquired immune deficiency.'”

World HIV & AIDS epidemic statistics, including people infected with HIV and deathsfrom AIDS. 25 Million Dead

33 million people live with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. 190 countries around the world recognize this day to raise awareness that the battle is not over in the fight against the world’s number one health threat.

An International Conference on AIDs will be held in Africa, December 3 through 7.

In the U.S., the Black AIDS Institute is asking the Obama administration to set up a domestic funding program for HIV/AIDS prevention, according to BET.The institute says this is increasingly a black issue as about half of the over one million Americans living with HIV or AIDS are black.

Increasingly women and girls are finding themselves part of the growing numbers, with about 11 percent of newly reported AIDS cases contracted either through sex with infected men or injected drug use. African American woman accounted for 66 percent of the newly diagnosed cases in 2005, according to theCenters for Disease Control and Prevention.

The New York Times, in an editorial, says that the WHO developed a mathematical model predicting what would happen if most adults and adolescents were tested every year for the AIDS virus, and those who were positive were treated immediately with antiretroviral medications. The policy now is to use the drugs after your immune system is depresse

There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.

MR. SIKES. Are we doing any work in that field?

DR. MACARTHUR. We are not.

MR. SIKES. Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest?

DR. MACARTHUR. Certainly not lack of interest.

MR. SIKES. Would you provide for our records information on what would be required, what the advantages of such a program would be. The time and the cost involved?

DR. MACARTHUR. We will be very happy to. The information follows:

The dramatic progress being made in the field of molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of science to biological warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and provided the following observations:

1.All biological agents up the the present time are representitives of naturally occurring disease, and are thus known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purposes.

2.Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon when we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.

3.A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million.

4.It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular biology is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent scientisis in the field., almost all are in university laboratories, and they are generally adequately supported from sources other than DOD. However, it was considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of sciences – National Research Council (NAS-NRC, and tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However decreasing funds in CB, growing criticism of the CB program., and our reluctance to involve the NAS NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past 2 years.

It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaked lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of the ways it could be done. there is little that can be done to devise defensive measures. Should an enemy develop it there is little doubt that this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate research program.

4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular biology is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent scientisis in the field., almost all are in university laboratories, and they are generally adequately supported from sources other than DOD. However, it was considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of sciences – National Research Council (NAS-NRC, and tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However decreasing funds in CB, growing criticism of the CB program., and our reluctance to involve the NAS NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past 2 years.

It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaked lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of the ways it could be done. there is little that can be done to devise defensive measures. Should an enemy develop it there is little doubt that this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate research program.

“Letter of Transmittal”

Commission on Population Growth and the American Future

726 Jackson Place, N. W.

Washington, D. C. 20506

March 27, 1972

To the President and Congress of the United States:

I have the honor to transmit for your consideration the Final Report, containing the findings and recommendations, of the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, pursuant to Sec. 8, PL 91-213.

After two years of concentrated effort, we have concluded that, in the long run, no substantial benefits will result from further growth of the Nation’s population, rather that the gradual stabilization of our population through voluntary means would contribute significantly to the Nation’s ability to solve its problems. We have looked for, and have not found, any convincing economic argument for continued population growth. The health of our country does not depend on it, nor does the vitality of business nor the welfare of the average person.

The recommendations offered by this Commission are directed towards increasing public knowledge of the causes and please=”” acknowledge of population change, facilitating and guiding the processes of population movement, maximizing information about human reproduction and its consequences for the family, and enabling individuals to avoid unwanted fertility.

To these ends we offer this report in the hope that our findings and recommendations will stimulate serious consideration of an issue that is of great consequence to present and future generations.