Jurassic Park Easter Egg - Who Made the DNA?

OK. In Jurassic Park, Henry Wu (the geneticist) shows the visitors a piece of 'Dino DNA' taken, he says, from a dinosaur.

The way DNA works is to have groups of 3 letters, made from combinations of A, G, C or T, each coding for a chemical known as an amino acid. There are 20 amino acids, each has a single letter code name.

Someone actually pieced out what the DNA coded for, in single letters, then looked this up in the universal protein database, to see what it was. It's actually a chicken protein. But after about 150 letters, the chicken protein breaks for a while to say 'MARK WAS HERE' then back to chicken protein, and a bit further on the word 'NIH' has been put in too.

Pictures and Videos

Comments

In response to the idiot above aka (Smaug), because he pollutes this site with dumb posts (smog get it?), you should learn to read. Mish did explain quite clearly as a biology student working for a bio tech I would have to say that "The way DNA works is to have groups of 3 letters, made from combinations of A, G, C or T, each coding for a chemical known as an amino acid." explains it quite well for a general description. Your quote was "My comment: it is even quite interesting to see a biochemist thinking that an amino acid is represented by a single letter an not by a base triplet (three letters) :-)", but see he did say groups of 3 letters please pay more attention before acting smug and making comments about things you do not understand obviously your envy comes from your lack of knowledge thus making you want to lower the assumed intelligence of others. Please feel free to mail me with any questions :-)

Would you all like to know the real deal with this egg? Well I don't really care if you do or not -- I'll tell you anyway! (This is all taken from my copy of a great book titled 'The Science of Jurassic Park' by DeSalle & Lindley) Mark Boguski is an NIH (National Institutes of Health) scientist who works at the National Canter for Biotechnology and Information, and specializes in the database storage and retrieval software. He's the person who first identified the DNA sequence in 'Jurassic Park' [the book] as that of an E. coli plasmid instead of a dinosaur, and he wrote to Crichton about the error. Crichton then asked Boguski to provide a more authentic sequence for 'The Lost World' [also the book]. So this "Mark" person decided that since dinosaurs are related very closely to modern birds, what better DNA strand to provide then that of a chicken. Mark actually sent in the blue-prints for the "erythroid transcription factor" protein of a chicken. Then, knowing full well that, in the future, people would be arguing over this very topic, Mark tweaked the DNA sequence just a bit so that, when translated, one gets 14 more amino acids then the chicken’s protein should really have. These 14 acids are grouped into 4 blocks, and the initial letters of those 4 blocks’ names spell out MARK WAS HERE NIH. Thus, Dr. Mark Boguski of NIH gets credit for his research along with a little something to laugh with his co-workers about around the water cooler -- and, likewise, nerds like us are given fodder for a good debate. Thank you for your time. S.M.B..

Gah. Can of worms. Couple of things...
- I didn't try and pass it off as my own. Or at least, that wasn't my intention. (Note I did say that 'Someone actually pieced out what the DNA coded for' not 'I did this...')
- JP was a book first, then a film. Hence a literary egg. I don't even know if this bit of DNA appeared in the film.
- That bit of DNA earlier looks like the wrong one. There's quite a few in the book. I haven't got the book with me here but I did check all three reading frames in it and there was no message. Regarding the 'code' I was using - there wouldn't be a different one; pretty much everything uses the same code. OK, there are a couple of exceptions (I think there's a sea squirt or something which is slightly different, not sure why) so whatever code you've got is right. Look at http://bio.lundberg.gu.se/edu/translat.html if you want a thing to do it for you. The bit of DNA there appears to have part of a Salmonella protein in it. That may just be coincidence...
Hope all of this helps
Mish

The whole story is actually listed in the book 'The Science Of Jurassic Park' which has been published for years and years and years now... the information above is virtually verbatim - nice attempt to pass off someone else's work as your own! :)

This is a literary egg. I love the book Jurassic Park and am sitting here with it in my hand. the DNA strand is written out like: GCGTTGCTGGCGTTTTCCAGGCT making it possible to have the egg mark was here written out in the DNA strand. The movie never really went into great depths with the DNA strand since it is too scientific for average people to understand.

The sequence from the book is:
1 GCGTTGCTGGCGTTTTTCCATAGGCTCCGCCCCCCTGACGAGCATCACAAAAATCGACGC
61 GGTGGCGAAACCCGACAGGACTATAAAGATACCAGGCGTTTCCCCCTGGAAGCTCCCTCG
121 TGTTCCGACCCTGCCGCTTACCGGATACCTGTCCGCCTTTCTCCCTTCGGGAAGCGTGGC
181 TGCTCACGCTGTAGGTATCTCAGTTCGGTGTAGGTCGTTCGCTCCAAGCTGGGCTGTGTG
241 CCGTTCAGCCCGACCGCTGCGCCTTATCCGGTAACTATCGTCTTGAGTCCAACCCGGTAA
301 AGTAGGACAGGTGCCGGCAGCGCTCTGGGTCATTTTCGGCGAGGACCGCTTTCGCTGGAG
361 ATCGGCCTGTCGCTTGCGGTATTCGGAATCTTGCACGCCCTCGCTCAAGCCTTCGTCACT
421 CCAAACGTTTCGGCGAGAAGCAGGCCATTATCGCCGGCATGGCGGCCGACGCGCTGGGCT
481 GGCGTTCGCGACGCGAGGCTGGATGGCCTTCCCCATTATGATTCTTCTCGCTTCCGGCGG
541 CCCGCGTTGCAGGCCATGCTGTCCAGGCAGGTAGATGACGACCATCAGGGACAGCTTCAA
601 CGGCTCTTACCAGCCTAACTTCGATCACTGGACCGCTGATCGTCACGGCGATTTATGCCG
661 CACATGGACGCGTTGCTGGCGTTTTTCCATAGGCTCCGCCCCCCTGACGAGCATCACAAA
721 CAAGTCAGAGGTGGCGAAACCCGACAGGACTATAAAGATACCAGGCGTTTCCCCCTGGAA
781 GCGCTCTCCTGTTCCGACCCTGCCGCTTACCGGATACCTGTCCGCCTTTCTCCCTTCGGG
841 CTTTCTCAATGCTCACGCTGTAGGTATCTCAGTTCGGTGTAGGTCGTTCGCTCCAAGCTG
901 ACGAACCCCCCGTTCAGCCCGACCGCTGCGCCTTATCCGGTAACTATCGTCTTGAGTCCA
961 ACACGACTTAACGGGTTGGCATGGATTGTAGGCGCCGCCCTATACCTTGTCTGCCTCCCC
1021 GCGGTGCATGGAGCCGGGCCACCTCGACCTGAATGGAAGCCGGCGGCACCTCGCTAACGG
1081 CCAAGAATTGGAGCCAATCAATTCTTGCGGAGAACTGTGAATGCGCAAACCAACCCTTGG
1141 CCATCGCGTCCGCCATCTCCAGCAGCCGCACGCGGCGCATCTCGGGCAGCGTTGGGTCCT
1201 GCGCATGATCGTGCTAGCCTGTCGTTGAGGACCCGGCTAGGCTGGCGGGGTTGCCTTACT
1281 ATGAATCACCGATACGCGAGCGAACGTGAAGCGACTGCTGCTGCAAAACGTCTGCGACCT
1341 ATGAATGGTCTTCGGTTTCCGTGTTTCGTAAAGTCTGGAAACGCGGAAGTCAGCGCCCTG
However, in the only code which I could find on the Internet, it is represented by:
ALLAFFHRLRPPDEHHKNRRGGETRQDTKDTRRFPLEAPSCSDPAATRIPVRLSPFGKRGCSRCRTLSSVsVVRSKLGCVPFSPTAAPTPVTIVLSPTRsSRTGAGSALGHFRRGPLSLEIGLSLAVFGILHALAQAFVTPNVSARSRPLSPAWRPTRWAGVRDARLDGLPHTDSSRFRRPALQAMLSRQVDDDHQGQLQRLLPAsLRSLDRsSSRRFMPHMDALLAFFHRLRPPDEHHKQVRGGETRQDTKDTRRFPLEALSCSDPAATRIPVRLSPFGLSQCSRCRTLSSVsVVRSKLTNPPFSPTAAPTPVTIVLSPTRLNGLAWIVGAALTLVCLPAVHGAGPPRPEWKPAAPRsRPRIGANQFLRRTVNAQTNPWPSRPPSPAAARGASRAALGPAHDRASLSLRTRLGWRGCLTMNHRTASEREATAAAKRLRPMNGLRFPCFVKSGNAEVSAL
I don't know about you, but I can't find anything in there that looks like an english sentance. Were you using a different code set? The one which I used was found at http://www.algoart.com/help/softstep/alldocs/aatable.htm
Possibly the book has a different sequence than the movie?
-mwars

Fixer, that makes sense. Mr. Crichton probably asked the N.I.H. for help in creating a plausible dinosaur D.N.A. string. And I'll give you three guesses as to who created it for him... Why ask the N.I.H.? I'm not entirely sure since it doesn't make all that much sense. My only guess is that they do use animals for experimental purposes (see http://www.nih.gov/science/models/), so they would have to be somewhat familiar with sequencing D.N.A.
Or maybe Michael Crichton had a friend named Mark who just happens to work at the N.I.H. who helped him out with his book by creating the D.N.A. strand...
Or maybe it really does say "|\| | |/|" and the National Institutes of Health have nothing to do with this egg at all...

Crichton was contacted by someone who complained that the DNA sequences were unrealistic. He responded and was sent the snippet as included in the book. Like I said, the whole story is actually listed in the book 'The Science Of Jurassic Park'...

Anyone who has read the book (not JP, the one which revealed this egg), or knows otherwise, which DNA sequence in the book (JP) is this a reference to? The one which I typed is the only complete sequence which I could find. Any information is appreciated!

Look, guys, I know this will probably not be helpful at all, but SIMPLIFY! I mean, I read classics and everything, and I am not stupid, but please, not everyone is a biologist... considering that I am only a teenager.

I think this might clear up the confusion. Scroll down to the BLAST problems (in a big green header). The first problem deals with the DNA code in Jurassic park and the subsequent sequence in the Lost World.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Class/FieldGuide/problem_set.html

It counts as a literary egg because Jurrasic Park was a book many years before it was made into a film.
This is true of many films - they start out life as books and are made into films by Hollywood people.

What do you mean you think it is surprising that a biochemist would refer to an amino acid with a single letter? Amino acids are coded with three bases per acid, for example, the amino acid alanine could be coded by the triplets GCU, GCC, GCA, or GCG (there are 64 combinations possible and only 20 amino acids, so there is more than one code for each amino acid). However, if one is writing out the amino acid sequence of a protein they are not going to write alanine, serine, arginine, etc. They instead use a three letter code (in this case, ala, ser, arg...) or a one letter code that represents each amino acid (A, S, R in this case.) Just though I would clear this up. I'm not a biochemist, but I am a biology major who has had plenty of classes in genetics and biochemistry. (And no, I can't verify the correct sequence or that it really says "MARK IS HERE." I'm not that into the book!) Thanks.

Iris is correct , this is not a literary egg - it should be in the Film section.
How can you "see" a strand of DNA in a book ? To find the egg in the book, the DNA would have to be described in detail , therefore spelling out the very words that are the egg !

Casquivana-it actually isn't nih as most people think but it was meant to be the symbol for a band called nine inch nails. their symbol for their band is three letters an N a I and a backwards N so you see it isn't nih but actually is nine inch nails abbreviated. P.S. they are a great band