7 Steps to Solve the Gun Crime and Terror Crisis in America

Regardless of the shooter’s creed or breed, whenever occurs a high profile shooting it is invariably laid to the account of guns and White people. Somehow.

And as is typical, the Lügenpresse and their fellow travelers have seized on the recent mass shooting in Las Vegas as a pretext to abolish the Second Amendment and abrogate the God-given right of self-defense cherished by Anglo-Saxons for a millennium.

Of course, liberals want conservatives to play reactionary badminton with them. The liberal expects that when he (or is it zer nowadays?) takes up his “there-oughta-be-a-law” refrain that the conservative can be relied upon to respond with overtures urging moderation. And act II of the sequence is always the liberal’s condemnation of conservatives as heartless Nazis for harboring even the most tepid reservations. And act III, of course, features the capitulation of the conservatives.

At least, that’s the script as it typically plays out.

The one thing their agreed-upon rules of seesaw preclude most strenuously is that Christian principle overturned can never be revived.

But that is the very thing the Christian man insists must happen. Both by the command of God, and secondarily, for the simple fact of its sublime utility. Because God’s law and society sprang from the same mind, they therefore work most harmoniously together, while all other law orders only strain against reality. The true answer to the question of mass shootings and like terror attacks is found uniquely in the Christian law order that obtained at the time of this country’s settlement.

Here. then, are seven ways to end mass shootings in America.

1) Outlaw liberalism.

Even normie GOP folk grasp that crime and violence are normative to areas under liberal control. Even if a particularly sedate form of granola liberal founds a community, their views facilitate and import the violent strains which otherwise define the liberal society.

McCarthy was right. Liberalism is embryonic communism. Liberals don’t represent valid opinions, only a resolve to destroy all that is good and exalt evil in its place. Anyone determined to outlaw the founding faith and folk of the nation do not represent an alternative opinion. They are an enemy insurgency who in many cases should be tried for blasphemy and treason, and in all cases precluded from the franchise.

2) Ban Islam in America.

Everyone knows Islam is the predominant threat in regard to terror attacks, mass shootings included. But liberals, who otherwise deny the validity of crime stats in general, are quick to point out that Whites are the demographic most connected to mass shootings. But this is wholly on account of the percentage of government false flag operations that use White men as patsies almost exclusively. More on this in a bit.

Muslims have never qualified as “free White persons of good character” (Act of 1790), and therefore cannot be Americans. As we have repetitiously and conclusively identified them as hostile invaders, their total removal from this land is mandatory.

3) Indict the manufacturers and distributors of SSRIs, as well as the state entities promoting them.

Not only is the data conclusive that a margin bordering on majority of mass shooters are on psychotropic prescription medication, but the medication MSDS outlines the side effects to said drugs as including things like suicidal ideation, psychotic behavior, violent tendencies, etc. Which is to say that the responsible parties are aware of their culpability and persist undaunted. Thus only further incriminating themselves.

But the due reckoning on this issue will not obtain, of course, without the abrogation of “limited liability corporations.”

4) Immediately deport all Mexicans and like stock.

Merchant, bonded, and ambassadorial exceptions notwithstanding. Obvious as it otherwise is in every other capacity, Mestizo-Indio violence is concealed in the official statistics by means of some very apparent thumbsmudging. Playing the long game, subversive forces in our government have for several decades tallied Mestizos as “Caucasian” on birth certificates and “White” in census and criminal filings; meantime, they are also counted as Latino, Chicano, Hispanic, Native American, mixed-race, or Other whenever the victims of crime. These intentionally deceptive algorithms allow the bulk of their violence to be laid to the account of White people in crime stats, and contrariwise creates a facade of civility over their demographic. These are the facts that must be taken into account when tallying real crime figures.

But anyone with the good sense God gave a taco vendor can see mestizo neighborhoods are crime-ridden hellholes. And the dissemblers haven’t yet devised a way to effectively cover up the manifold higher crime rates tallied geographically, by city and county. They tell the real story in spite of all the legerdemain otherwise blurring the matter.

Fact is, many Latin American countries have higher peacetime violent casualty rates than do hot warzones in the Middle East. Remarkable as that is.

All of which more than vindicates Americans’ practical safety concerns about the southern border. We have demanded the government expel the mestizo presence for the better part of a century now. If the powers that be would only move in accord with the people on this (not to mention founding principle and biblical law), then violence of all sorts — including gun violence — would drop precipitously.

5) Restore the founding principle of arms, barring all but “free white persons of good character” (per the Act of 1790) from the ownership and carry of arms.

While the NRA’s argument that an armed populace reduces gun crime and promotes civilized society is true, it isn’t universally so. Fact is, this dynamic is particular to Whites. As respects Black, Brown, and Red men, the matter is starkly the reverse: whether we look at African countries where Kalashnikovs are more common than bicycles, or Black communities in America where most households have at least a handgun, such arms amongst them do nothing to diminish violence.

And the same applies to Mexico and Mexican communities in America, if to a lesser degree.

Guns in White hands (Christian Whites, especially) improve the world. Not so with most other peoples.

Granted, guns may be allowed provisionally to those Blacks and Browns bonded to a White employer or slavemaster, but any moving about on their own have no right to arms in our land.

Christians all understood this up to recent times. Selling arms to Indians and African freemen was always considered treasonous to Christendom and generally treated as a capital offense. A return to this stance would save untold lives.

Among all the efficient causes of violence in American society, none surpasses racial integration. The restoration of segregation is the surest and most direct route back to Mayberry. And whether we’re speaking of FBI crime stats, the unending Black riots, and public calls by the Black mainstream to exterminate White people, or the thousand other indicators of hyper-violence amongst Blacks, we are without excuse: everyone knows the real choice is that we will have diversity, or we will have safe streets for our children, but we can’t have both.

7) Disband the CIA, FBI, and all such alphabet agencies.

These entities have proven themselves a constant source of false flag terror. This isn’t even a debatable point as Operation Northwoods, Operation Gladio, and Operation Cyclone are all a matter of public record, and prove the case all on their own. And they are just the tip of the evidentiary iceberg. Most conservative analysts of these matters will confess that a majority of terror attacks, as well as most plots thwarted, are to one degree or another products of these alphabet agencies. The truth is, there would simply be fewer mass shootings, bombings, etc. without them.

And there is no constitutional justification for them, besides.

In conclusion:

Unlike the humanist law order of our day, the above propositions do not represent any a la carte approach, but a holistic and synergistic law order that works in accord with reality. Yes, they might be abbreviated as a return to the antebellum Constitution, prior to the Lincolnian inversion; but more simply still, they are but Theonomy applied.

Relative to which some will object to the fact that I omitted any stipulation of a restoration of the Christian faith. But the fact is that all of the above points presuppose it. They cannot be implemented apart from it. And any Christian faith that does not pursue these is not a consistent Christianity.

Taken altogether, the socio-civil order that these proposals assume and assert — the restoration of our folk under the dominion of Christ — is the only true remedy.

Ehud Would is a Conservative Presbyterian of Scandian-Germano-Celtic background and a refugee from the reconquista state of Southern California, who having recently followed the Northwest Imperative, resettled his family in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho where he pursues writing, illustration, medical administration, and presides as an elected official.

Newsletter

Receive F&H Updates By Email:

Email address:

Leave this field empty if you're human:

Faith & Heritage is a consortium of Christian writers from a traditionalist perspective. F&H features a diverse range of opinions among its writers, and any particular opinion expressed is not necessarily indicative of universal agreement among F&H admins or writers.

The superhero genre was one of the last quasi-traditional genres of American pop culture. Batman, Superman, and the other assorted heroes and villains literally came out of the early twentieth-century[…]

About

Remember the days of old; consider the years of many generations; ask your father, and he will show you, your elders, and they will tell you. When the Most High gave to the nations their inheritance, when he divided mankind, he fixed the borders of the peoples according to the number of the sons of God. - Deuteronomy 32:7-8