This 'topological form' (a reasonable, correct description) is great because it incorporates windows, and structure into the way the the thing was thought of from the beginning.

They are stating that this is different than a form that needs to be 'jacked-up' after it is designed, or 'punctured' with windows post-design. We all know how many digitally-driven architectural projects are conceived in that post-operations manner. The above paragraph simply says that the digital technique and aesthetic feeling used to design the project, took the creation of structure and windows into account- from the very beginning.

I'm definitely in favor of eliminating bullshit from Architecture, but I don't like when critics think it's cool to pretend to be Morons...

Xtiaan, I think this at least, is a bit more than just "purdy" as you say..

"It proposes a method and a set of aesthetic principles that extend the architectural potential of topological form by incorporating architectural systems such as structure, aperture, fenestration and construction directly into the project’s geometry"

this is so heavy on the art wank its gonna implode, its a pretty folly, be done with it!
colour used serves only to further confuse the issues here.

this idea of "incorporating architectural systems such as structure, aperture, fenestration and construction directly into the project’s geometry" is very fascinating and has lots of potential--however this project really seems like only an exercise in sexy-ass-modeling.