This stupid, banal argument has dragged on long enough, Ghost. You've already lost. All this bullshit about the word savage and rationalty is just frivolous nonsense to mask the fact that your initial argument about the un-knowability of the supernatural was flimsy and poorly held together crap to begin with. You're only continuing in this pointless and peripheral line of bull-hockey because you have a pathological aversion to losing an argument, and rather than admit that someone else has a point, you'd rather start a new argument based on the wording of a quote from a hundred year old dead man. Pathetic.

You will undoubtedly have some further brilliant stuff to say about ad hominem arguments or the subjectivity of knowledge or some crap, in order to prolong the debate. But it doesn't matter, because I've already won. Why? Because instead of engaging you on your irrelevant bullshit, or taking the bait of that idiot troll nami-whatever, I will instead spend tomorrow soaking in the natural beauty of the Grand Canyon and the marvelous engineering masterpiece of the Hoover Dam, a fitting conclusion to a week in Vegas in the company of good friends, food, and beer.

I win becausr I am going to keave you to sit yelling at the abandoned pages of a dead thread on an internet forum,

The people closely associated with the namesake of female canines are suffering from a nondescript form of lunacy.
"Anti-environmentalism is like standing in front of a forest and going 'quick kill them they're coming right for us!'" - Jake Farr-Wharton, The Imaginary Friend Show.

The people closely associated with the namesake of female canines are suffering from a nondescript form of lunacy.
"Anti-environmentalism is like standing in front of a forest and going 'quick kill them they're coming right for us!'" - Jake Farr-Wharton, The Imaginary Friend Show.