I commenced this inquiry by describing the global context referring to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) Declaration to reach health goals around the world by 2015. The MDG 6 aims to reduce HIV/AIDS infections by 2015. I made connections to Thailand’s Health Care system which is guided by the same principles underpinning the Alma-Ata Declaration. The overall purpose of this PhD study was to research alongside Thai families whose offspring had lost their lives to HIV/AIDS. Literature was prolific around stigma, orphans and caregivers, but none had woven these topics together to explore what was going on in families affected by HIV. My research question was: What can be done to assist Thai families whose lives have been affected by HIV and/or AIDS? The objectives were to: (1) identify and understand how families accommodate a situation in which they are providing ongoing care for children of relatives who have died of HIV/AIDS (2) provide a means of registering the effects of widespread societal changes on the family when HIV and AIDS interrupt people’s lives and traditional Thai family structure (3) plan for action and, where feasible, act on issues raised and prioritized by families caring for orphaned children of family members to assist them in this changed situation. Using Koch and Kralik (2006) participatory action research methodology I researched alongside five families who live in rural communities near Khon Kaen in Thailand. I was in the field for 12 months. The methodology comprised storytelling with nine participants followed by group sessions. The democratic principles guiding this inquiry are: social justice, social equity, freedom of speech and human rights. So how did families accommodate this situation? I have presented their stories in their entirety albeit they are translated versions from Thai to English. Fourteen (main) constructs arose from my one to one interviews with family members who were participants in my study. Reflecting on participants’ stories and these 14 constructs I observed that constructs 1-7 were about the dramatic events that happened nearly a decade ago for five families. Yet their experiences of those harrowing times were recalled as if they happened yesterday. Participants talked about the shock surrounding the diagnoses of HIV/AIDS. They explained about upheavals experienced with changing houses and moving back ‘home’ to the village. Grandparents described complex nursing care they had to learn to give to their offspring, including understanding the principles of universal precautions. They provided care and comfort to five extremely ill daughters of whom three daughters died of AIDS. Grandparents felt the weight of additional responsibilities as they took on the major role in caring for the children of those who were sick or had died of AIDS. The family grew in size when the orphan came ‘home’ to live with his grandparent(s). Major restructuring of families occurred out of necessity. Relationships changed, the family was often reliant on extended families for housing, financial and emotional support. Families were forced to adjust to new ways of living. It was interesting to note how they managed major interruptions in their daily routines. There was no preparation for these crisis events. Moreover, dire economic circumstances meant that often there was no choice but to reconvene as a ‘new’ family. However, families adjusted to new ways of living, as was shown in constructs 8-14. They managed interruption to daily routines. Financial difficulties were experienced by three families whose poverty worsened. All families made comments about changes they had to make to secure income for their newly composed family structure. In the village, rumours disturbed families; being discriminated against was brought to my attention in all stories. Most families were preoccupied about disclosure, whether a child should be told about their parents or about their own HIV health status. There were seven agenda items which all participants agreed to discuss in the participatory action research group discussion. Participants set the agenda: (1) Financial problems (2) Rumours and their impact (3) Access to social welfare payments (4) Discrimination and verbal abuse (5) Care of orphans when grandparents are ill or die (6) Services provided by Primary Care Unit (7) Prevention of HIV and health promotion. Participants commented that by working together to share their experiences they were able to address some of the concerns in their lives. Empowerment of participants was evident; awareness was created about common concerns they faced and increased confidence, amongst them, were the key benefits participants had gained from the group process. In terms of sustainability, participants have become a social network for each other. When researching alongside families, I worked toward building sustainable relationships. There were considerable strengths within families as shown by their resilience and ability to move on, I suspect assisted by their strong beliefs in Buddhism. Transition was possible despite emotional upheaval, financial hardships and social injustices experienced living in a culture where HIV is stigmatized. This participatory action research methodology was transformative in that families were able to accelerate their transitions to incorporate the consequences of living with HIV/AIDS into their lives. This inquiry has shown that participative problem solving in communities is effective. My future aim is to work toward greater participation in health care, so that people can contribute their ideas, plan and partake in effective action. I believe that by working together alongside community members we can make a difference. In this inquiry my ability to facilitate people to make changes in their lives has been the major driving force. I strongly believe that social justice and equity are enhanced when democratic principles guide our practice and research. Moreover, participation is a political imperative because it affirms the fundamental human right of persons to contribute to decisions that affect them. My thesis is that people have a right to have a voice about decisions that affect their lives, and in this situation all matters related to HIV/AIDS, and that a participative world view fosters these democratic actions.