There is a general myth that has grown up around Marco Polo, mainly well-intentioned attempts to inspire children to study, that Marco introduced such things as spaghetti, noodles and ice cream to China and the West. There is no truth to any of these claims and indeed Marco never cites them in his book

“Marco Millions,” a poetic, floridly written satire of the 13th century Asian travels of Italian explorer Marco Polo, is one of Eugene O’Neill’s lesser known, misunderstood, and perhaps most controversial plays. It was originally produced on Broadway in 1928 with lavish costumes and a cast of 19, including the legendary Alfred Lunt.

But yes, there are monsters in them thar hills.

Theatrical historians have contended that “Marco Millions” was O’Neill’s irreverent reaction to America’s post-World War I prosperity and sense of global domination, but if anything, this is a story about Marco Polo’s misguided sensibilities in regions of the world he never quite understood.

In 2000, Smithfield created an internal company security force with “special police agency” status under North Carolina law that enables company security officers to exercise public police powers. In 2003, the company police used trumped-up charges to arrest workers who were active union supporters.

“The company has armed police walking around the plant to intimidate us,” a Smithfield worker who came to the United States from El Salvador told Human Rights Watch. “It’s especially frightening for those of us from Central America. Where we come from, the police shoot trade unionists.”

Yes. But was an insult to real journalists who had spent years investigating and reporting these stories in their real complexity. And it also served the conceits of its American audience.

so no WMDs? If a cursory search of the Chinese internet didn't further suspicions that Daisey's was but the Disney version of allegations made, I wouldn't feel the need to ask, respectfully and ever so sheepishly, have you ever received compensation from Apple or any of its subsidiaries for the time you put into maintaining the corporation's public image Russell?

Don’t be ridiculous. Daisey lied in his monologue, in the This American Life doco and to a string of journalists who directly asked him about it. He actively tried to cover up those lies.

Sure, Daisey insulted the journalists, I got that. The reason I asked is your repeated "don't touch the Apple, look at the meat" campaign reminds me of the Chinese '5 mao', The 5 mao are a group set up to diffuse anti-government sentiment, paid 5 mao for each post one writes in support of the Party (in response to attack). You've come out pretty strong on this considering the mass and visibility of allegations raised on this side of the firewall. People can't stop buying Dafur.

Sure, Daisey insulted the journalists, got that. The reason I ask is your repeated “don’t touch the Apple, look at the meat” campaign reminds me of the Chinese ‘5 mao’,

I honestly think it's a real issue, especially when stuff in China is huge headline news and stuff in the US southern states is largely confined to trade publications. The armed factory guards that Daisey lied about seeing in Shenzen have actually been a reality in America.

You’ve come out pretty strong on this considering the mass and visibility of allegations raised on this side of the firewall.

I think I’ve mentioned it twice in posts. And I think I’ve also been very clear that US tech firms (and Apple in particular) and their suppliers should be closely scrutinised. But a lot more Americans eat chicken than own iPhones. And the industry that brings them chicken has been hideous for decades. It’s just not such a sexy story.

I honestly think it’s a real issue, especially when stuff in China is huge headline news and stuff in the US southern states is largely confined to trade publications. The armed factory guards that Daisey lied about seeing in Shenzen have actually been a reality in America.

I don't disagree that it is a real issue, and fully deserving of it's own thread. Yet 137 workers poisoned by n-hexane cleaning iPhone screens (link from other thread), is no less real and iPhone issues are certain to generate bigger headlines given that people are holding iPhones in their hands, they cost an arm and a leg, and it's one of the few corporations that consumers will go out on a limb to defend en masse, certainly there's a reactionary element there, and Apple's slick marketing only enhances the sex appeal. Some of Daisey's stuff was just preposterous - armed factory guards in Shenzhen - in a nation where firearms are illegal? Per chance armed with kung fu? Sorry I never listened to his thing, I imagined it was much the same as his stage show. Did you watch that TBBT episode Russell?

I don’t disagree that it is a real issue, and fully deserving of it’s own thread. Yet 137 workers poisoned by n-hexane cleaning iPhone screens (link on other thread) is no less real

Yes, and it was justly reported after it happened, two years ago and 1200km away at a factory run by a different company, Wintek.

Apple wasn't the only company having screens made by Wintek, but it deserves scorn for trying to ignore the injuries caused by the use of that cleaning chemical. I presume its views had a role in the subsequent sacking of factory managers, but Apple clearly wasn't keen on paying compensation.

Sir, you put a smile on my face with that post. Most of all (from the last thread) I'm grateful to you for highlighting the fact that my Nokia was most likely also produced at the Sz Foxconn plant (or somewhere similar). It's as good a motivation as any to lose less phones.

The Adam Minter mentioned in Schmidt's story is, I strongly suspect, the one who can be found blogging here. His blog's been a bit quiet of recent months, but I think a browse through the archives will show he tends to be fairly careful and balanced and make sure he has the facts.

Lifted from your link to - Hispanic Poultry Workers Live in New Southern Slums

The lack of affordable housing affects workers' health, safety, and family stability. Because good housing is so scarce, it is not uncommon to find several families or groups of men living in one ramshackle house, each paying rent for conditions few Americans would tolerate.

Could easily be NZ - the exception being that we generally tolerate these conditions.

Having a decent rate of unemployment helps and if you have a core of workers who insist on retaining terms and condition, being covered by a collective agreement and won’t take a drop in wages well then you just sack them and hire some one else.

It is iRONIC - that place where truth and fiction get fuzzy is the place where history is written/created everyone, these days, tends to write (make up) their own history/truth regardless of reality.

One interesting part (for me, anyway) of this story has been the lily-livered assertion by Mike Daisey that what he did was OK because it was "theatre". Not surprisingly, a lof theatre people have been quite dismayed by this, and it's prompted quite a few reflective pieces of writing (not to mention the odd angry tweet).This article http://grist.org/media/mr-daisey-and-the-fact-factory touches on a point about what makes good storytelling: the building of trust in a particular, not necessarily "real", world; and of course when that trust is broken, people feel very angry.

If you go on a stage and say that you personally saw something, and the show in which you make this claim is not clearly identified in some meaningful way as "fiction" or "fictionalized," [Emphasis mine] then you'd better have seen it--especially if you tell your audiences that they need to take action based on what you claim to have seen.

Although in the comments, it's striking that several people have been able to convince themselves that Daisey's translator is a stooge put up by Apple and the Chinese government. The fact of Daisey's confession doesn't seem to be an impediment to their beliefs.

If you go on a stage and say that you personally saw something, and the show in which you make this claim is not clearly identified in some meaningful way as "fiction" or "fictionalized," [Emphasis mine] then you'd better have seen it--especially if you tell your audiences that they need to take action based on what you claim to have seen.

Hard to disagree with any of that.

I don't get this. Why would anyone expect a theatre piece to be literally true?