Senate Republicans aren’t sweating a ramped-up push by Democrats and President Barack Obama for new pay equity legislation — pushing forward women Republicans to rebut charges they have a woman problem and doubting the issue will resonate with voters.

“I think the Democrats are doing anything they can to try to change the subject from the nightmare of Obamacare and the joblessness that we experience in our country right now,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

But Democrats contend that Senate Republicans ignore the pay equity issue at their political peril come November, with control of the Senate at stake.

“They are out of touch,” Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., a member of Democratic leadership, said of the GOP after a press conference touting the bill. “They are so in their conservative echo chamber that they don’t know what’s going on in America and that’s going to help us dramatically in 2014.”

Their comments came as Obama signed two executive actions Tuesday designed to help ensure equal pay for federal contractors.

“Republicans in Congress have been gumming up the works,” Obama said Tuesday. “They’ve been blocking progress on this issue, and of course other issues that would help with the economic recovery and help us grow faster. But we don’t have to accept that. America, you don’t have to sit still. You can make sure that you’re putting some pressure on members of Congress about this issue.”

The Senate is scheduled to take a procedural vote Wednesday on the bill, which would, in part, require employers to provide pay information when requested and not retaliate against the worker seeking the pay data.

The vote may fail unless Democrats allow Republicans to offer amendments to the bill and could be the first of many procedural votes on the measure as Democrats seek to fire up women voters.

“We are going to come back to this issue several times this year, just as we did with unemployment insurance, and see what kind of excuses Republicans come up with for opposing this common sense bill,” Schumer said, acknowledging that the bill may fail to get the 60 votes needed to advance Wednesday.

Republicans argue that the Democrats’ bill — along with their so-called “Fair Shot” agenda for the year — is a political ploy that will not fool voters.

“I think the American public is smart enough to see this for what it is,” said Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., said of the Democrats’ maneuvering. “They have no interest in policy. What they want to do is make a political statement.”

Fischer said her amendment would address issues Republicans have with the Democratic proposal, including negative effects to merit pay, rigid pay scales and removal of caps on punitive actions.

The Fischer proposal was one of several amendments, including a catchall amendment from Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., for which Republicans sought unanimous consent to set up votes if cloture is invoked Wednesday.

But Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., objected to the request, though he added that he remained open to possible GOP amendments.

“The question before the Senate is whether we should even begin debate on this matter,” Reid continued. “If Senators want to offer amendments we have to begin the debate. I’m always happy to talk about amendments.”

But Reid said the Thune amendment is not reasonable. The 350-page package includes a raft of Republican proposals including small business tax cuts.

“I think if you look closely at this 350-page amendment you might even find a kitchen sink in it, it’s got everything else in it,” Reid said. “It’s really a perfect example of trying to divert attention from the subject at hand. This isn’t a serious effort to try to debate equal pay for equal work.”

Thune sought to offer the amendment last week to the bipartisan unemployment insurance extension passed by the Senate Monday in exchange for expediting passage of the measure, but Democrats turned down the offer.

Republicans also believe the Democratic bill is a gift to trial lawyers, who are typically allied with Democrats.

“I think most people see through this and realize this is a sop for to the trial lawyers and not really about fairness,” said Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn.

But Schumer argued that voting to filibuster the pay equity bill would be tough to explain to constituents over the upcoming recess.

“If the Republicans filibuster our bill tomorrow they are going to have to go home to their constituents, men and women alike, and explain to them why men should make more on the dollar compared to women,” Schumer said.

TJ

April 8, 2014
8:04 p.m.

Rovin

April 9, 2014
8:55 a.m.

Desperation by the Democrats, (who can’t run on ONE positive accomplishment by this administration), is becoming quite obvious. Hence the feeble tactic of promoting class and gender warfare—thinking this will encourage their base to show up at the polls—while deflecting from the real issues concerning mainstream Americans, namely the disastrous power-grab of the health insurance industry, a still fledgling economy, and the lowest jobs participation rate in 30-plus years.

Notice to our dear liberal progressive Democrats: The American public/voters are not buying this garbage any longer, and their eyes will be wide open in November, despite these pathetic diversionary tactics.

CementCityBoy

April 9, 2014
12:38 p.m.

Yonatan YONATAN

April 13, 2014
7:57 p.m.

While the crisis in the Ukraine, is newsworthy and important, let us not forget the more than two million unemployed workers, and their families, who had loss their benefits last December, still waiting for the Unemployment Extension Bill to pass in the senate. Since late last December, the Republicans have dragged their feet, and have put off passing the bill, while millions of families have been suffering on account of it. For the first time in many years, the senate failed to extend the benefits for the unemployed, leaving these poor families to suffer eviction, home foreclosures, bankruptcy, and homelessness. Even though the congress quickly approved of Billions of dollars in aid for the Ukraine. How is this possible? How can the republicans justify spending Billions of tax payer’s dollars on foreign aid, yet refuse to help poor Americans at home? These workers were not asking for something that they haven’t already paid into over the course of their working years. These families need help, and need it now. If our country can use tax payer’s money to Bailout Huge Corporations, they should be also capable of giving assistance to those who have worked for it. The problem isn’t with the poor and unemployed in this country, but with the government spending billions of dollars on Corporate welfare and corporation bailouts. What happened after all those bailouts?? The CEO’S rewarded themselves with huge bonuses on the tax payer’s tab. That was the thanks we received from Corporate America for our help. The Republican Party likes to represent their party as being the party for “family values”. But where are their values? Charity should begin at home, and it’s been too long now that these unemployed Americans have been suffering, Senators such as John Boehner, have shown their contempt for the poor and less advantaged in this country, and in the coming elections in 2016, the Republican Party will realize their mistake in not supporting these two million unemployed workers.

Anonymous

July 4, 2015
5:55 a.m.

Anonymous

July 9, 2015
5:35 a.m.

I was curious if you ever thought of changing the structure of your blog? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or two images. Maybe you could space it out better?

Anonymous

July 21, 2015
8:10 a.m.

Thank you so much for giving everyone an extremely memorable possiblity to discover important secrets from this website. It can be very useful and also stuffed with a lot of fun for me and my office colleagues to visit the blog on the least 3 times in one week to see the latest stuff you will have. And definitely, we’re usually pleased for the fabulous information you give. Some two facts in this post are unquestionably the best I’ve had.

July 24, 2015
6:29 a.m.

Anonymous

July 24, 2015
1:45 p.m.

Anonymous

July 24, 2015
6:13 p.m.

In this awesome scheme of things you get a B- for hard work. Exactly where you actually lost us ended up being on the facts. You know, as the maxim goes, details make or break the argument.. And that couldn’t be more correct in this article. Having said that, let me tell you exactly what did deliver the results. Your authoring is really powerful and that is possibly the reason why I am making an effort in order to opine. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. 2nd, even though I can notice the jumps in reasoning you make, I am not really convinced of exactly how you appear to connect the ideas which inturn produce the conclusion. For the moment I will, no doubt yield to your position however trust in the foreseeable future you link the facts better.

Anonymous

July 28, 2015
5:28 a.m.

Nearly all of whatever you articulate is supprisingly appropriate and it makes me ponder why I had not looked at this with this light before. This particular article truly did turn the light on for me personally as far as this subject matter goes. However there is actually just one issue I am not too comfortable with and while I make an effort to reconcile that with the actual main idea of your issue, permit me observe just what all the rest of your subscribers have to say.Nicely done.

Anonymous

July 30, 2015
2:18 p.m.

I do enjoy the way you have presented this situation and it does supply me personally a lot of fodder for consideration. Nevertheless, from what precisely I have witnessed, I only hope as the actual opinions pile on that men and women keep on issue and in no way get started on a tirade of the news du jour. Yet, thank you for this excellent point and although I can not agree with this in totality, I value the viewpoint.

Anonymous

today
1:43 p.m.

Roll Call Video Picks

About #WGDB

Niels Lesniewski has covered the Senate for CQ Roll Call since January 2010, and more recently as a staff writer and resident procedure guru for Roll Call. Niels holds degrees in both government and theater but sometimes can't tell the difference between the two. @nielslesniewski