I would somewhat agree with you on unbanning Genesect, but it's a really tough call. There are a lot of factors that went into its ban, and I'm not really in the mood to argue about something like Genesect. I for one thought it was OP, but not entirely broken. In some cases though, I thought to myself why this thing wasn't Ubers, but at other times I enjoyed having it here.

Sorry if I took so long to get back to you; I've been a bit busy with other stuff as of late.

Well, I appreciate that you already answered all my typical interview questions in your post, so I can cut straight to the point. I think the group would appreciate having you in it. BUT, I would like to ask you about something.

I've noticed before that you're conduct on discussions can be a little...off...at times. Notably, you had that nasty little argument with dablackchuggaaconroy in the OU Cores thread. The Smogon Creators Organization does not tolerate that sort of thing, so I would ask that you restrain yourself and don't do anything stupid. Think you can manage that?

Well, I would, but I'm really not a good team rater... I'm not the best at analyzing teams and finding holes in them.

Although, I saw Dcae's rate, and I have to agree with him on most oh his points. I was thinking Choice Scarf Latios would make a better Scarfer than Alakazam, though it seems I was beaten to it. One other thing I would suggest is that you change Surf on Jellicent to either Scald or Shadow Ball. Dcae already described Shadow Ball, and Scald would provide Jellicent with a way of applying pressure on the opponent for fear of a burn, since even resists dislike being burned.

Would you please stop posting "this core is raped by such and such" in OU cores thread? First of all, any given core isn't going to be able to every threat, especially threats like Thundurus-T; that's why we have 6 teams slots. In addition, half of your cores are "raped" by the same Pokemon.

It's one thing to suggest good teammates to cover the core's weakness, but quite another to just pointlessly - and hypocritically - criticize.