We have debated the Tribe rotation to death in the off-season, but I wonder what your opinion is when comparing our rotation to the competition in the AL Central. I know we need to wait until the final week of spring training to factor in adjustments to who is #1-#5 for each team, injuries, etc. But as it stands today, I rank them as follows:

1: Minnesota Twins: Liriano, Baker, Slowery, Blackburn, PerkinsThe rotation is young and unproven, but the upside is through the roof with these arms. If Liriano is finally back to 100% in 2009, they might have the best 1-5 starters in MLB and I think even the most die hard of fans would struggle to name three of players if asked on the street...

2: Cleveland Indians: Lee, Carmona, Pavano, Reyes, LaffeyProbably the best depth in the AL Central, with really 8-9 potential MLB starters. Too much concern with Carmona, Pavano, Reyes, Laffey all four returning from injuries - to put this rotation at the top of the AL Central. But, they have incredible depth with all the young arms...

3: Chicago White Sox: Buehrle, Danks, Floyd, Colon, RichardThe key is the #4/#5 spots holding ground until Contreras returns to the lineup. We could say the same as the Indians with Westbrook, but I would rather have a player returning from anything but TJ surgery. I look for Contreras to have a major impact during part II of the 09 season. If they get solid pitching from whomever starts 09 as the #4/#5 starter, I think the rotation of Buehrle, Danks, Floyd, Contreras will be tough to battle come August and September...

NOTE: I think the rotations for the Tribe, White Sox, Twins will be good enough that all three teams will compete for the division and wild card spot...

4: Detroit Tigers: Verlander, Galarraga, Bonderman, Jackson, MinerThe fans that predicted some down seasons after the World Series run were correct, so will the Tigers arms bounce back? I think they go into the season with only 4 legit starters and that is why they will struggle to hang with the Tribe, Twins, Sox in the division. They really need Miner, Robertson, or Willis to step up and post some numbers...

5: KC Royals: Meche, Greinke, Bannister, Hochevar, DaviesWho cares about the Royals, they are night and day better, but still put them near the bottom. Meche & Greinke are solid FOR arms, but Jeremy Sowers would win the #3 spot on their rotation and he will not make ours...

slegend wrote:1: Minnesota Twins: Liriano, Baker, Slowery, Blackburn, Perkins...I think even the most die hard of fans would struggle to name three of players if asked on the street...

Including you!

Sincerely,Kevin Slowey

Just goofin'.

Man, there's a lot of volatility in the division, isn't there? Liriano could be great ... or lousy. Reyes could be anywhere from below to above average and I wouldn't blink. Bonderman might be healthy or not or good or not: no single quadrant would surprise me.

I think in terms of pure upside, Minnesota is the top, but if you're asking about what I think the PERFORMANCE will end up being, I'll go:

Agree with the list for the most part. One note of contention: I would trade Sowers for Bannister any day of the week. I think Bannister's upside blows Sowers away, and right now they're probably close to equal, but I would still rather Bannister.

reppination7 wrote:lets not forget, we will get jake westbrook the second half of the season

In theory we do. I don't expect Jake to be the old Jake until at least next season. Counting on him for any measure of production might bring some heart-ache. If he does contribute, more the better, but I don't think the Tribe has high expectations for a guy coming off major arm surgery last year.

reppination7 wrote:lets not forget, we will get jake westbrook the second half of the season

In theory we do. I don't expect Jake to be the old Jake until at least next season. Counting on him for any measure of production might bring some heart-ache. If he does contribute, more the better, but I don't think the Tribe has high expectations for a guy coming off major arm surgery last year.

Exactly. People expecting to see October '07 Westbrook when he steps out of rehab are going to be disappointed. 2010 is a more reasonable expectation IMO.

You wonder, if the Indians pitching staff is going well, if Westbrook even makes it back to the team until September. Wouldn't make sense to have him as a 6th starter, when he could be getting more reps in Columbus.

Toxicadam wrote:You wonder, if the Indians pitching staff is going well, if Westbrook even makes it back to the team until September. Wouldn't make sense to have him as a 6th starter, when he could be getting more reps in Columbus.

Guess it depends on what's going right and wrong at the time. If they're in the mix and getting nothing from 4 and 5 I can see the allure of running Westbrook out there. But that's about the only scenario. If they're dead and buried why risk it til he gets his innings in. If they're running away with it then obviously 4 and 5 aren't huge issues so you let him build up arm strength and get right in Columbus.

Who knows, maybe he's farther along than we think right now. Or maybe he's not even a consideration until 2010 already though we've heard nothing along those lines.

I just think anything he gives you is gravy and expecting anything is not being realistic.

Well I did read the other day, Westbrook is like 4 weeks behind schedule but that was because they decided to do that surgery on the hip at the same time, so that pushed the table back a bit, but still won't be much a problem. It will be more of a benefit than a problem.

As for his return date, this is how I see it, if everyone is doing well in the rotation, I think they keep Westbrook on working back to form as much in extended ST, than put him on the full duration of his rehab, then maybe even consider him for the bully for the rest if the rotation is still doing good and were in contention. I am worried about Reyes though, no matter what problems he may have had with Duncan in St. Louis, but he had and still has lingering elbow issues.

Tribe Fan since 1995!

And...

Remember, fans, Tuesday is Die Hard Night. Free admission for anyone who was actually alive the last time the Indians won the pennant.

slegend wrote:1: Minnesota Twins: Liriano, Baker, Slowery, Blackburn, Perkins...I think even the most die hard of fans would struggle to name three of players if asked on the street...

Including you!

Sincerely,Kevin Slowey

Just goofin'.

Man, there's a lot of volatility in the division, isn't there? Liriano could be great ... or lousy. Reyes could be anywhere from below to above average and I wouldn't blink. Bonderman might be healthy or not or good or not: no single quadrant would surprise me.

I think in terms of pure upside, Minnesota is the top, but if you're asking about what I think the PERFORMANCE will end up being, I'll go:

Honestly, almost no order would surprise me to any great degree except Detroit moving up more than 830 slots.

I think Buff is right with his final point: any order could happen. These teams all have a lot of questions surrounding the starting pitching. Minn has some upside, but does Liriano have any more than Carmona, who has been the subject of much speculation on our boards? I would wager the Sox finish with the best rotation, but the Tribe could be right there, especially if Huff comes in and makes an impact like he can. I think our bullpen is what will push us over the top. We're stronger there than anyone else in the division.

Expecting a lot from Jake is a reach, given past performance of pitchers in his position. We would be fortunate if he can make a playoff impact (God willing).

"The point is, ladies and gentleman, that greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right, greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit. Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge has marked the upward surge of mankind."

Unfortunately I fear Edwin Jackson could be a huge boost to Detroit's rotation. It doesn't fix their bullpen(thank God) but it could take some strain off of it. Bonderman is a mystery to me, FOR stuff that never seems to come together. If these two come close to their potential we could be in trouble. I think what allows me to have hope almost every year is the fact that there are so many variables it is impossible to predict anything. For me its fun to talk about the potential and skill sets of individual players. That being said my prediction is as follows:

1. Detroit- Power arms in top 3 spots may make it hard on opposing teams.

2. Cleveland- Depth is our strength. Watch out for Laffey, Lewis, and/or Huff. Pavano will rebound and have a productive year.

3. Minny- Fall off even farther if Liriano falters but also have some depth.

4. KC- Greinke takes over #1 with Meche and Bannister following could be much better if someone steps into the 4 hole and performs.

5. Chicago- I believe it is going to be a long year in the windy city for the Sox.

The Twins have a very nice foursome of pitchers with Blackburn (I really like him). I have the utmost confidence in Carmona, so that's one negative most people have that I do not share. I also like Laffey, which will round out the top 5 (although I have little confidence in Reyes. Call me backwards).

Either way, it could be argued that the Twins, Indians and Sox are head and shoulders above the other two. And potentially, the Twins and Tribe could further elevate themselves.

If the Twins didn't have the most underrated relief pitcher in baseball (Joe Nathan), the Indians would have this hands down.

Shapiro has said on more than one occasion one of his big concerns for 2009 is the starting rotation. I have a suggestion - Paul Byrd. He's without a team currently, and there's no way he breaks the bank to get here. Granted he's 37 yrs. old, but why not sign him to a non-guaranteed deal, and bring him to camp to see if he can realistically help you. If not at the back of the rotation, he sure would be adaptable as a long man in relief. He was very hot when we traded him, and it's not always wise to look back at that and think he'll pick up right where he left off, but what's the harm in a Spring Training look-see?

The idea is that he wants to try the Roger Clemens mid-season train hop on a contender. It isn't out of the question that that team could be Cleveland, but it would take a pretty weird set of circumstances (and a whole heap o' failure by yoots).

I was opposed to keeping Byrd and letting Guthrie go, so Byrd just brings bad memories for me. If one of our young arms cannot give us more than Paul Byrd we are doomed anyway. I'm all for not blocking anymore talented youngsters with less than average vets. Just my respectfull opinion.