Ashes 2013: Ten moments that shaped England's series win

By Sam SheringhamBBC Sport at The Kia Oval

One of the subtle beauties of Test cricket is the way a five-day match can hinge on a split-second.

England's 3-0 Ashes victory over Australia featured several instances where dropped catches, umpiring errors or twists of fate altered the course of the match and, ultimately, the destination of the urn.

Here, we relive 10 pivotal moments from the 2013 Ashes summer, with reactions from the BBC Test Match Special team at the time.

Use the comments section at the bottom of the story to add suggestions of your own.

1. David Warner punches Joe Root

What happened:
Australia batsman David Warner arrived in England with a reputation for explosive batting, but it was his
explosive temper
that thrust him into the headlines even before the series had started.

What they said:
"David Warner is a loose cannon for Australia,
but he is still a potential match-winner. Warner's pride will be hurting after this latest off-field incident - and so it should be. I hope he thinks he let his team-mates down." - Test Match Special commentator Jim Maxwell.

Why it mattered:
The off-field incident betrayed the unrest in the Australian camp that subsequently
cost coach Mickey Arthur his job.
Warner was fined, banned and sent to play for their second string in Zimbabwe and South Africa, weakening Australia's batting line-up for the first two Tests.

2. Trent Bridge - Broad refuses to walk

What happened:
The opening Ashes Test at Trent Bridge was hanging in the balance when, late on day three, an edge from England all-rounder Stuart Broad brushed Australia wicketkeeper Brad Haddin's gloves and was caught by Michael Clarke at slip. When umpire Aleem Dar astonished almost everyone watching by declining to give the batsman out,
Broad remained poker-faced and stood his ground.

What they said:
"These sorts of things can scar a player for years to come and change their reputations within the game. Broad's body language afterwards told you all you needed to know - head bowed, shoulders slumped. He knew he had done the wrong thing." - BBC cricket correspondent Jonathan Agnew.

"The rules say that it's 'in the opinion of the umpire' so it's above things like 'The Spirit of the Game'. I don't see bowlers asking you back when the ball is sliding down leg." - Former England batsman & Test Match Special summariser Geoffrey Boycott

Why it mattered:
If Broad had been dismissed, England would have been seven wickets down in their second innings, with a lead of just 232. Following the reprieve, Broad took his score from 37 to 65 to help England extend their advantage by a further 78 runs. Australia, despite a heroic last-wicket partnership, lost by 14 runs.

3. Trent Bridge - Anderson and Hot Spot end Haddin's last stand

What happened:
Amid unbearable tension on the
final day at Trent Bridge,
Australia's final pair of Brad Haddin and James Pattinson took the tourists to the brink of victory with a partnership of 65. But when Haddin was caught behind off Anderson for 71 via a slight inside edge - confirmed by the faintest of Hot Spot marks on his bat - England could celebrate one of the closest wins in Ashes history.

What they said:
"Jimmy looks emotionally drained. He has a 10-for in the match and is the go-to man for Alastair Cook. It was the thinnest of edges, what a climax to the Test." - Former England spinner Phil Tufnell.

Why it mattered:
England's relief was palpable after clinging on by such a narrow margin to go 1-0 up in the series. Meanwhile, a deflated Australia failed to rouse themselves for the second Test at Lord's and were hammered.

4. Lord's - Rogers dismissal sparks collapse

What happened:
Australia were
going along well at 50-1 in reply to England's 361
when Chris Rogers took a swipe at a Graeme Swann full toss, missed, and was given out lbw. Conscious that Shane Watson had already used up one of his team's referrals, Rogers chose not to review but was left to regret the decision when Hawk-Eye suggested the ball was missing leg stump by some distance.

What they said:
"I've never seen anything like that in my life. It started out at eye level and never looked like pitching. Even Swann is not celebrating that one, he knows it was a terrible delivery. Chris Rogers will be absolutely mortified." - Phil Tufnell.

Why it mattered:
Rogers's comical dismissal was the catalyst for a disastrous implosion, as Australia were bundled out for 128 on their way to a heavy defeat.

5. Lord's - Glaring miss reprieves Root

What happened:
With a first-innings deficit of 233, Australia needed early wickets to stand any chance of getting back into contention at Lord's. Sure enough, Alastair Cook, Jonathan Trott and Kevin Pietersen all fell cheaply to leave the hosts teetering on 30-3. But the picture could have been rosier for Australia had an edge from Joe Root not sailed inexplicably between wicketkeeper Brad Haddin and Michael Clarke at first slip.

What they said:
"People talk about luck in sport. Joe Root certainly had that but the fact he ended the day with a fine century to his name, batting England into an impregnable position, was because he grabbed his opportunity with both hands and made the absolute maximum he could from it. It rather sums Root up. He looks angelic, but he is as hard as nails and as competitive as anyone in the side." - Jonathan Agnew

Why it mattered:
Root, on eight at the time of his let-off, went on to make a masterful 180 to take the match out of Australia's reach as England won by 347 runs to take a 2-0 lead in the series.

6. Old Trafford - Pietersen gets lucky

What happened:
Australia's first-innings 527-7 declared put them in control of the third Test at Old Trafford, and when England slipped to 110-4 in reply, the tourists sensed an opportunity.
Kevin Pietersen's hundred
was crucial to England's subsequent recovery but things could have taken a different course had he been given out lbw to Shane Watson for 62. Australia opted against a review, only for replays to show that umpire Tony Hill's decision would have been overturned.

What they said:
"If Australia had reviewed it, Pietersen would have been walking back to the pavilion now. Michael Clarke just saw one of the backroom staff show the finger to suggest it was out." - England's 2005 Ashes-winning captain Michael Vaughan.

Why it mattered:
Pietersen's 113 and some aggressive batting from Stuart Broad on the fourth morning helped England avoid the follow-on. The time Australia lost by batting again proved pivotal when heavy rain on the final day washed out their chances of victory.

7. Old Trafford - Rain rescues England

What happened:
Despite forecasts of apocalyptic weather, the final day at Old Trafford got under way only 30 minutes late and England - battling to save the game on a misbehaving pitch - were soon in deep trouble at 27-3. There were plenty more near misses as the hosts eked out a further 10 runs before the rain finally arrived at 2pm to
take the players off the field.

Why it mattered:
Three hours after the interruption, with no sign of a break in the weather, the captains shook hands on a draw and the Ashes had been retained in 14 days.

What they said:
"It was a slightly anti-climactic way for England to retain the Ashes but if you are an England fan you won't be too worried about that - it is a long time since their side wrapped up a series against Australia so quickly." - Jonathan Agnew.

8. Durham - Bell strides out to save England

What happened:
After conceding a first-innings deficit of 32 runs in the fourth Test in Chester-le-Street, England's top order folded to leave them 49-3 in their second innings and in danger of collapse. Not for the first time in the series,
Ian Bell had other ideas.
Piercing the gaps in the field and timing the ball impeccably, Bell compiled his third century of the series, his 113 taking England to 330 all out.

What they said:
"It was a special innings by Bell. He has such a rounded game - he looks gorgeous when he's playing his shots and there's hardly any shot he can't play. It's been a pleasure to watch him." - Former England opening batsman Geoffrey Boycott.

Why it mattered:
Bell's composed knock and some useful lower-order runs from Tim Bresnan and Graeme Swann set Australia an imposing 299 for victory. Although the tourists briefly threatened an unlikely triumph, an inspired spell from Stuart Broad catapulted England to a 74-run win.

9. Durham - Bresnan takes key Warner wicket

What happened:
Australia's pursuit of 299 for victory
in Durham was gathering pace, with David Warner motoring towards a counter-attacking hundred. At 168-2, England captain Alastair Cook threw the old ball to Tim Bresnan and his decision was instantly rewarded. With a ball that swung late away from the left-hander, Bresnan found the edge of Warner's bat to dismiss him for 71 and send England into raptures.

What they said:
"What a wicket that is for England - what a ball by Tim Bresnan. It came out of nowhere. It just bounced and took the outside edge. With two new batsman at the crease, it could shift the momentum." - Former Australia batsman Damien Martyn

Why it mattered:
After Bresnan opened the door, Broad smashed it off its hinges. Bowling as quickly and aggressively as at any time in his career, he produced a devastating burst of 6-20 in 45 balls to win the match and seal victory in the series.

10. Oval - Bad light ends the series

What happened:
With England needing 21 runs from the last four overs to pull off a thrilling win,
umpires Aleem Dar and Kumar Dharmasena took the players off for bad light
- in accordance with the International Cricket Council's playing regulations. Once the light had faded to the same level it was when they had stopped play on Thursday evening, they were obliged to halt play.

What they said:
"There's no question that this is darker than at any point in the game. This was always going to happen. Don't blame the umpires, don't blame the players... blame the ICC. We've been talking about this for a year or more that this was going to happen. It's an absolute disgrace. An absolute shambles." - Jonathan Agnew.

Why it mattered:
It signalled the end of the game and prevented England - who were in the box seat for victory, with 21 needed from 24 balls and five wickets still standing - from turning a 3-0 series win into a 4-0 thumping. England and Wales Cricket Board chairman Giles Clarke told Test Match Special it was "totally unsatisfactory" and said he hoped ICC chief executive David Richardson would change the rules at the next ICC board meeting.

Agnew reminds me of long-ago pointy-head Peter West, lotsa words but no content. Only good BBC pundits are Maxwell (he's not Richie B aka God but talks unbiased good sense) and Sir Geoff, puts people's backs up but knows his cricket in spades. Forget Vaughan, he's become a smoothie yes-man as several have noted below.

I follow cr**info now cos at least the text writers have a sense of humour.

192. Make you right. Read another report that said Warne thought it was 'crass' and 'arrogant' of the chaps to perform a urinification where they did. Of all the players, Warne calling people crass and arrogant. One couldn't make it up

Sir,I must protest most strongly at the antics of a number of our so called Gentlemen Cricketers who appear to feel that just because they were celebrating, it was pitch black at night and no one else was there it is acceptable to relieve themselves near to a scared temple of the wickets. It is not. I have never urinated inappropriately and neither have my wife or Captain Johnson.

It's naive to think minor infringements won't be picked up by the press these days, but its a sad reflection of the uk that we have lost our sense of humour and can no longer be anything other than politically correct sensitive souls with absolutely no character and have no fun. The BBC are very much part of the blame in their continued agenda to liberalise the world. It's boring!

Regarding Aggers comments & the idea that the teams will be equally matched this winter. We'll see. Can't help thinking England have been in second gear this year & still did what they needed to. Now, facing a real challenge on better pitches, you'll see their class. The Aussies want to make Broad cry but they'll be the ones crying when the media & public get on their backs after 1 bad performance

The stand out moment for me in the Ashes was the realisation that some Aussies (I won't say all because that would be unfair and incorrect) are terrible losers and really don't like it when the tables are turned on them like it has been in these last few years.

If they spent more time on their own cricket and less on commenting, sniping and yes whingeing then they might be in better shape.

I agree in the grand scheme of things, it's a minor transgression, but it is a pretty classless thing to do, and stupid especially when it was obvious there would be some people who would see and find out about it; no surprise that Broad was involved; at all.

I actually sat through a game once as my son wanted to watch one, I can tell you that is the last time any cricket is going on my TV, it was so numbingly boring - I couldn't understand my son who was jumping around excitedly.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.