Game Description:Resident Evil writes a chilling new chapter as the Umbrella Corporation's bioweapons have fallen into the hands of rogue leaders. Play as Chris Redfield in a remote desert colony overrun by a new breed of evil. With hordes of flesh-eating beings ready to make you their next snack, escape may be the best way to survive. Environments play an increased role, with horrors possibly lurking in every alcove or behind every shadow. New lighting effects will make you wonder - was that movement, or just an illusion?Â Good thing you're not alone. A new focus on co-op play teams you with a zombie-destroying sidekick Sheva, who changes the way RE is played.

Resident Evil 5 Review

'Resident Evil 5' has finally hit shelves. With all the fanfare surrounding the latest 'Resident' storyline installment, does this game live up to the hype or fall short? Is the single-player campaign fun, or is this a co-op focused experience? Will your new sidekick Sheva be helpful or waste all your ammo and get in the way? In this X-Play Review, Adam Sessler takes a look at the new multiplatform game 'Resident Evil 5' and answers all of your questions.

The Pros

Exceptional Visuals

Solid co-op, especially split-screen

Some fresh environments

The Cons

Support A.I makes 1-player agonizing

Several uninspired scenarios and sequences

Some Questionable use of Stereotype

To say Resident Evil 5 is arriving under a cloud of anticipation would be the understatement of the year. 2005’s Resident Evil 4 was nothing short of a revelation (and received X-Play’s Game of the Year) in how it took a series that was getting seriously long in the tooth and reinvented it wholesale without making it entirely unrecognizable from it’s predecessors. Four years have passed since its release and in that time the quality, ambition, and innovation in videogames has accelerated at an astonishing rate making the formula that Resident Evil 4 brought to the table less impressive by contemporary standards. Unfortunately, not enough has changed with RE5, in all level of its design, to help it keep pace with the new standards in gaming.

Resident Evil 5 returns somewhat to the main storyline, abandoned since Resident Evil 0, with Chris Redfield on the hunt for bioterrorism in a fictional African country. As luck would have it in these games he stumbles upon a plot that involves a virus similar to the Las Plagas nastiness of Resident Evil 4. From here the game devolves into a pursuit of various characters and “the truth” behind the experiments that are the backbone of the Resident Evil storyline. While it begins with promise to wrap up the lingering details with the operatic pomp of Metal Gear Solid 4, RE5’s narrative quickly turns clumsy and slapdash. Secrets that are reveled are so blatantly telegraphed from the outset that they lack punch, and the thrust of the narrative is so adolescently linear and told through such embarrassing dialogue that any resonance that was hoped for at the end of a thirteen-year story arc are lost forever in the mess. While storytelling has never been the hallmark of the Resident Evil series it’s unacceptable that what’s in the game is holding to some time-honored tradition.

… Like in A Fiddler on the Roof

Regrettably, tradition plays yet another role in RE5’s flaws. The control scheme mirrors that of RE4 which was an improvement for the series back then but comes across as an unfortunate anachronism wholly unjustified by the game in 2009. Chris Redfield and his co-op partner Sheva once again move with plodding sluggishness that is only partially relieved by running and still cannot move while shooting. Rotating the character to aim or just see what’s happening is equally slow and the quick 180-degree turns so frequently discombobulate your perspective that the aggregate effect of the controls neuters the satisfaction of combat. This is not to say that the controls render the game unplayable, but it is baffling to figure out how the experience is enhanced by what comes across as arbitrary impediments to gameplay that only serve to heighten the tension by virtue of the frustration incurred. RE5 is, first and foremost an action game, what little puzzles elements that characterized the series before are few and inconsequential, with that in mind, the decision to disregard the gameplay standards in third person action games over the past five years seems nothing short of myopic given the numerous gamers brought into the fold during this generation who will undoubtedly find themselves hamstrung by the controls.

Curiously the game itself doesn’t seem to accept its own control scheme. Quicktime events appear frequently during combat offering melee attacks and during boss battles for dodge rolls. It seems like a cop-out to include these options at the whim of the game rather than organically incorporate them into the control scheme, they’re clearly deemed useful to survival in the game or they wouldn’t need to be included. The dodge roll in particular would alleviate the awkwardness of the quick-turn.

Another instance of the controls and the game seeming out of sync is the inventory system. Unlike previous Resident Evil games, opening your inventory occurs in real-time, it does not pause the game. Nonetheless the inventory is as cumbersome to navigate as in previous installments with each item having up to five different uses. Thankfully a quick select is made available for four items tied to the d-pad, but each character only has nine slots available overall, making each slot woefully significant. Between the challenge presented by the controls in combat and the difficulty navigating the inventory in an efficient amount of time accessing those five other slots in combat can prove to be yet another unnecessary burden.

In a nod to other games, RE5 allows the player to take cover, which becomes essential in the latter section of the game as the zombified enemies have guns (yup!). Although, once again, this attempt to accommodate contemporary game design is hampered by the game’s fidelity to its control scheme, once in cover you cannot move in cover nor can you alternate your viewpoint from right to left and must leave cover, move, and take cover again to improve your vantage point.

These instances when the game’s design and control come in conflict with one another pale in comparison to the experience of playing the game in single player, with the co-op character Sheva being controlled by A.I. The concept clearly is that the challenges presented by the controls and the more 360-degree nature of the combat are alleviated by having another character that can flank enemies and offer assistance. While that doesn’t excuse the control scheme, it would make it acceptable if Sheva was reliable when being controlled by the computer. She isn’t. As Chris Redfield you can offer up two commands “Attack” and “Cover.” In “cover” Sheva stays close to you and conserves ammo, primarily by leaning on her weakest armament. In “attack” Sheva will more aggressively go after the enemies and default to stronger weapons. Problem is in “attack” she unloads all her ammo indiscriminately without judging or prioritizing the enemies at hand, in addition she exercises a fearlessness that results in many deaths, which forces a restart to the section, whether nor not you are still alive. Typically you’ll want to have Sheva near you, with weapons you do not intend on using and the majority of the health (she is good at healing you at the right time), as you take on the lion’s share of the death dealing.

It’s perfectly fine to play the game with this strategy, but the game is designed for two efficient players. Several set pieces, especially the boss battles clearly are laid out for strategies where both characters attack the problem from different angles, the workaround approaches to accommodate the A.I.’s limitations leaden the experience and only heighten the frustrations with the game’s decision on the controls and inventory. The survival horror motif, as established in the Resident Evil series, has always been about enduring with limited supplies. Playing RE5 alone, the limitations seem to be the game itself as it continuously gets in the way of an enjoyable experience.

Playing co-op is a different story, as the game opens up dynamic approaches to its challenges and the frustrations are fewer and further between. Playing co-op actually feels like a different game with the levels opening up new opportunities to experiment with play styles that had no easy application in single player. Perhaps the greatest surprise is the split-screen mode which doesn’t follow the traditional 50/50 split but instead doesn’t use the entire real estate of the screen in favor of maintaining the correct screen proportions in both halves. It works amazingly well; in fact it sometimes works better than online as RE5 is well suited to strategizing with someone right next to you rather than over a headset. Either way, co-op is the way the game should be played, although its rather long running time does require a good commitment from a friend.

While RE5 is far more accessible in co-op one thing it doesn’t fix is the uneven nature of the game’s design. There are some great sections in the beginning of the game, in particular the coastal shantytown at the beginning and the “native village” a little further in. Both of these sequences are fraught with a compelling atmosphere; that of a society in collapse and a dank foggy swampland, and both stand out as fresh and new. The rest of the game is nowhere near as compelling with overused locales of laboratories, a cargo ship, and a temple that seems more appropriate to Tomb Raider than Resident Evil. Moreover the scenarios also becomes increasingly contrived with conveyer belts, lever puzzles, and the odd decision to give the infected enemies guns and grenades, reducing the game to a strange and unsatisfying derivation of Gears and multiple other third-person shooter. As is traditional with the series the Boss Battles are standouts although the latter third of the game has a few that left me scratching my head as to their logic and design. While RE4 did eventually drag on, there was a sense of consistency and invention that propelled the game, here many of the elements feel piled on without much care or enthusiasm.

History and Context

One more matter does need to be addressed. Ever since the first trailer, there has been concern about RE5’s portrayal of Africans. Frustratingly the majority of the thinking has been a zero-sum debate as to whether the game is racist or not, as if those are the only two labels that can be applied. Let me be clear, the game is not racist, insofar as it in no way attempts to advance an agenda of one group’s superiority over another. Nonetheless the game does traffic in some truly loaded images, the most blatant of which are the residents of the native village who are adorned in grass skirts, tribal masks, and spears; images that held much currency through the centuries of colonial rule and were used to justify the imperialism vis-a-vis this “otherness.” In addition, the allusions to Mogadishu in the beginning and an enemy who is meant to evoke African strongmen dictators like Idi Amin also serve to provoke more contemporary anxieties through their exoticism. These caricatures are not being utilized in RE5 to reconsider their significance or re-evaluate our seduction to their implications but are merely vehicles for our entertainment by virtue of their exoticization. For me, the use of these images feels careless and exploitative and casts pallor over what is nothing more than escapist entertainment, were they not employed, they would not have been missed.
Resident Evil - Degeneration

Alright this review has been decidedly cranky-pants so it is worth reiterating that the game has its high points, especially the astonishing visuals and the effectiveness of co-op play. Resident Evil 5 is mired in poor design decisions that drag down the experience and render single-player campaign a tedious exercise in working around the game. It’s frustrating to see a game that I so looked forward to playing and carried with it such potential, sabotage itself in so many ways. Compared against the ambition of games like Bioshock, Mass Effect, and Assassin’s Creed; Resident Evil 5 seems timid, unwilling to move out of its comfort zone. It’s a shame.

Comments are Closed

Resident Evil 5 wasn't a bad game it just wasn't a great one. Let's really get down to the bare bones about why this game wasn't as successful as Resident Evil 4. The game wasn't scary. The first Resident Evil game I ever played was Resident Evil 3. The bio-weapon Nemesis chased you through the whole game and gave you a feeling of being stalked. In Resident Evil 1 the dogs that jumped through the windows in the east hallway on the first floor made you jump out of your skin and made you look before you ran blindly around a corner. In Resident Evil 2 the zombie arms that grabbed you from the windows of the west hallway on the first floor gave me a fright. The floor falling out from underneath you on the second floor in the library was unexpected. Resident Evil 4's chainsaw manic kept you on your toes and inspired terror. Resident Evil 5's co-op ruined the atmosphere and turned the game into a action game with little or no scares. Maybe the developers of the Resident Evil franchise will take note and bring back scary.

This review is accurate. I am a die hard Resident Evil fan, and seeing this game disappoints me deeply. The controls are shaky, the AI is horrible, and (towards the latter part of the game) the atmosphere gets dull. Yes, the graphics are fantastic, but people will only get past that if they are a die hard fan and they truly love the Resident Evil arc that defined a stand-alone zombie genre rather than just a broader horror genre for games. Also, when Adam was talking about how people say " the controls and sense of strained play is just what Resident Evil is," this is both true and untrue. Most who love the series do feel a gratitude when playing and being frustrated because that reminds them of time when they really enjoyed the older games, but I think that is just a state of mind, not a purposeful application into the game. 3/5 is what I give Resident Evil 5 for gamers not related to the series (5/5 for true because they'll disregard what any review says, and love it anyway).

Okay I personally think yes this game did drop the ball as far as the origins of the the series go. But its still a good game, it changes some key elements of the story in favor of tying up some of the loose ends but there are still a great deal of questions left unanswered that need to be addressed. This game was entertaining and I for 1 thoroughly enjoyed it, however the series has strayed too far in some ways while remaining loyal to its past in others this inconsistent take has gained the series new fans but at the expense of many fans of the original. RE4 was a masterpiece, but so was RE1, 2, and 3 in my opinion. Im hoping for some remakes of 2, and 3 with the RE1 treatment (maybe even a bonus or 2) As for RE 5 the only play where it comes close to pleasing the original fans is in the Lost in Nightmares DLC, playing back to the days of old and including an old school camera. I would love to see a mix, where the old games play like normal but with an optional over shoulder camera. Im getting slightly off topic now. The point is RE5 was good for what it was but it was more of an Action game than a survival horror and that is an issue I would give it a 4 out of 5.

Adam Sessler seriously. zombies or infected can use knives, pitch forks, bow guns, and chainsaws but machine guns are a no no. Don't get me wrong I don't find re4 and re5 all that great. I'm just questioning your review on the part about the guns being in the game. when you had pointed out that you liked re4 in your video, but did you ever question the zombies or infected in that game. They used guns as well as rocket launchers in re4. So it is forgivable in one game but laughable in another.

I remember downloading and playing the free version on the ps3. I was like, 'wow, i hate the controls', 'wow, i hate these controls'. What worked in resident evil 4, which i still like to play, does not work here, where you expect the combat to be bit more realistic, instead of five zombies running at you and then stopping right in front to walk a few paces and then hit you. STUPID!!!!!

im sorry adam but you are retarded. this game is amazing. im still playing this game a in 2010 and i still think its one of the best games of 2009.and to call this game racist is ridiculous. in the first minutes of resident evil 4 you see a woman nailed to a cabin wall with a pitchfork but thats okay. resident evil 5 is great game and deserves at least 4 stars. and theres like 5 different control schemes that you can choose so what the hell are you talking about. wow xplay epic fail on your part. epic fail.

I just got this about a week ago or so. It was about what I expected: more of RE4-style gameplay...except now I have to contend with a stupid AI partner who I HAVE to keep alive or else it's GAME OVER...2-Player co-op was nice enough, but I've never gone into the RE series for it's brilliant co-op play (probably because most of the co-op games suck?). It just wasn't worth the $30 used price so I traded it in for Trauma Center: Second Opinion on Wii & Rock Band 2 for XBOX 360 (two excellent games, btw) and I haven't looked back since (...not counting this comment...>_>).

This is one of those reviews that G4 blew big time. If you are not into political correctness and hypersensitive about "racism" issues this game is fantastic. The coop in the game is amazing (unlike Halo ODST, this game actually lets you play online with random people, who a lot of the time, are fun to play with). There is also a ton of replay value in this game, in fact it is not until you have beaten the game and get all of the neat options that the game really comes to life. This is a great game!

this game was absolutely amazazing!!! the graphics were great, once i got the controles down they were very easy to use and feaures such as being able to use the d pad to acess your inventory was the cherry on top. the only problem with this game was the frustration bought on by having a parner controlled by the computor that gets in the way and dies to much. i love the way it is split into chapters that review your gameplay and grades you on how many kills, time, etc.. so u can keep playing till you accomplish a perfect game, there are so many weapons, items and unlockables its like the game never ends... i was impatient with the story line towards the end but the levels were unique and i appreciated having different taskes to accomplish in each level... its does not contain the immpeccable ame play of resident evil 4 which i could play over and over using different strategies, but it is definately my favorite xbox 360 game

I totally agree with this review. Even though I LOVED RE4, the controls just don't cut it with today's games. After playing the demo, I thought I'd get used to it. But if anything, they just became more of a pain to use, as my deaths seemed to come from turning issues, inventory bull and the ridiculously inept melee. Dealing with Sheva (particularly with inventory) was also VERY annoying and didn't help the experience at all. It's too bad the amazing visuals were wasted on such broken and out-dated mechanics.

No, he was being extremly Generous.. This game flat out sucks.. Its a disgrace to all resident evil games.. The story line is extremly stupid the T-virus is not joined in with Africa making it a huge lie.. Not to mention, the controls do suck compared to other games this game is 5 years below what it should be...

I absoulutly (mispelled), disagree with this review, Resident evil 5 is, without a doubt, one of the best games to come out this year, and one of the best co-op experiences this generation. That said, I absolutely (correctly spelled) agree with his gripes about the game. There are moments when I wish the game offered a little bit more maneuverability. The story is fine, it isn't bad, but it isn't good, but the voice actors do a good job. This game could have done without the tribal uniforms, and it definitely could have done without the half a$$ed gunfights....awful. This game doesnt innovate, but neither does Call of Duty, and both are great in the end.....

Server Error in '/' Application.

Runtime Error

Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the application error from being viewed remotely (for security reasons). It could, however, be viewed by browsers running on the local server machine.

Details: To enable the details of this specific error message to be viewable on remote machines, please create a <customErrors> tag within a "web.config" configuration file located in the root directory of the current web application. This <customErrors> tag should then have its "mode" attribute set to "Off".

Notes: The current error page you are seeing can be replaced by a custom error page by modifying the "defaultRedirect" attribute of the application's <customErrors> configuration tag to point to a custom error page URL.