Electric tweezers: Not permanent- or- How to waste lots of money needle-lessly

OK, here's the concept: grasp a hair with the
electric tweezers. They're attached to a machine that produces a current, which
is supposed to travel down the hair and work like electrolysis. However, you
don't have to be an electrical engineer to know hair isn't a very good conductor
of electricity.

FDA statement on electric tweezers

Since 1976, there have been 25 brands of electric
tweezers cleared by FDA, and in 22 years, there has been no clinical data proving
permanence. On October 8, 1998, the FDA stated this about the electric tweezer
category: "FDA acknowledges that there is no statistically significant
scientific data available at this time to support promotional claims of permanent
or long-term removal of hair through use of the device."

Types of electric tweezers

For further information on each of the three
categories below, click on the appropriate link.

Radio frequency electric tweezers

As seen on TV. These claim that modified AC
(alternating current )can travel down a hair grasped by their tweezers, all
the way to the root, where they claim the electricity works just like regular
needle thermolysis. This product was first invented in 1959, and in four decades
there have been no verifiable reports of permanent results.

After years of deceptive advertising by these
tweezers claiming permanent results, The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
made a landmark deceptive advertising ruling against one of these companies
in 1988 (Removatron).

Unfortunately, the most brazen of these companies
continue to sell this bogus device as permanent, and charge from $100 and
$4,000 for one of their devices. The latest catch-phrase they use is "ultrasound"
or "ultrasonic" to describe their tweezers.

Brands:

Removatron

IGIA Tweezer System

Total Perfection

Finally Free

Forever Free

Aavexx

Elysee

Hair Tronics HT8000

Sonique

Feminique

Dapelle

--

Galvanic electric tweezers

These claim that DC (direct current) can travel
down a hair grasped by their tweezers. They claim enough current reaches the
root of a hair to work just like regular galvanic electrolysis. However,
hair conductivity tests have proven that this claim cannot be true. Although
they say the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has allowed them to advertise
as permanent, FDA has begun sending these electric tweezer companies letters
requesting them not to refer to the FDA in any sales materials.

Brands:

GHR (Guaranty Hair Removal)

AHRS (American Hair Removal Systems) TE 629
and TE 429

Permanex

--

Transdermal "electrolysis"

These companies originally sold galvanic tweezers,
but found that the same temporary effect could be achieved without the tweezer.
These claim that DC (direct current) can travel down a hair when the skin
is coated in gel and an electrified Q-tip is touched to the skin (I'm not
kidding). They claim enough current reaches the root of a hair to work just
like galvanic needle electrolysis. However, hair conductivity tests have proven
that this claim cannot be true.