I have been looking at the many great pages in the Wiki and as a relatively new addition to the team, I have a lot of fresh thoughts on what I found difficult to understand or locate as I was coming up to speed. I have been making a number of small adjustments to the wording, grammar, style, etc. to make it flow a bit more consistently and help answer questions I am seeing in the forums.

As I search through the forums, I am finding it difficult to isolate discussions focused on Wiki updates vs. discussions just referencing the Wiki. I think we could benefit from adding a sub-forum under Community focused on the Wiki itself. In that forum we could post:

Feedback from users on things that are hard to understand, but the user is afraid to "be bold" in the Wiki

Running threads listing sections that need updates where various editors can take a shot at them

Ideas for proposed larger section changes or additions

Recommended style guidelines when making changes/additions to the Wiki

Links to new pages in alternate languages that would benefit from translation to other languages

Discussions and subsequent links to polls where we are voting on changes around more subjective things like map editing recommendations, e.g. Ramp naming

In RL I do a lot of documentation and technical writing, I am a very experienced Wikipedia editor, and I believe I can add value to the Waze Wiki. I just want to be sure I am in sync with the general community and I think this proposed sub-forum would help us all. If there is an alternate method to achieve this I am happy to listen as well.

Few will go to the wiki page to start a discussion of a problem. People start problems in other forums, and then it may evolve into "fix the wiki." In order for it to work I think there'd have to be active forum moderators that moved threads to the wiki forum when the wiki needed resolving.

Secondly I think a forum about the wiki discourages edits. As I noted in the lets vote on changes thread, requiring to have votes in a forum and deal with critics and troll's is enough to prevent 90% of the people from even trying. In my experience forums get a lot of people who like to complain but not take action. Wiki editors need to be positive action takers. So the forum is not necessarily conductive to what the Wiki actually needs.

In my opinion, go for it. Be bold! If someone doesn't like your wiki edits, there's an undo button they can press. Every wiki page has a discussion tab already for this purpose, so no forum is needed.

Secondly I think a forum about the wiki discourages edits. As I noted in the lets vote on changes thread, requiring to have votes in a forum...

I think you may have missed my point. The forum is to allow:

1) people to comment on the Wiki who are afraid to make edits directly.2) we do have forum moderators and they do move posts between forums when they are in the wrong place.3) the only votes are for things outside of style, grammar, corrections, etc.

Karrows wrote:In my opinion, go for it. Be bold! If someone doesn't like your wiki edits, there's an undo button they can press. Every wiki page has a discussion tab already for this purpose, so no forum is needed.

We have that now. Anyone is welcome to make edits. I already have. I also believe there are things that would also benefit from discussion. Having edited thousands of Wikipedia articles, I found that controversial changes do better with discussion and prevents edit wars. If you don't like the forum idea, you don't have to read it.