Tenn. Lawmakers Threaten to Block Subsidies If VW Plant Unionizes

Email this article to a friend

Volkswagen employees go to the polls on Wednesday, but will state politicians' threats affect their union election? Andreas Praefcke/Wikimedia Commons

In the run-up to a union election, workers typically run a gauntlet of threats from management, including claims that a vote to unionize will jeopardize their jobs by hurting the company’s bottom line.

But in the case of an upcoming union election for Volkswagen’s 1,600-worker auto plant in Chattanooga, Tenn., set to run from February 12–14, the company has pledged to remain neutral during the union drive. Last week, Volkswagen even invited the United Auto Workers (UAW), which is vying to represent the workers, to come and make a pre-election presentation at the plant.

While Volkswagen has vowed not to interfere, however, outside forces have picked up the anti-union playbook and are telling workers that choosing union representation could endanger their jobs. At a press conference on Monday, Tennessee Republican State Senate Speaker Pro Tempore Bo Watson and Republican House Majority Leader Gerald McCormick implied that state subsidies to Volkswagen could be blocked if the plant unionizes.

"Should the workers at Volkswagen choose to be represented by the United Auto Workers, then I believe any additional incentives from the citizens of the state of Tennessee for expansion or otherwise will have a very tough time passing the Tennessee Senate,” Watson said at a press conference Monday in Chattanooga, according to online newspaper TheChattanoogan. “The workers that will be voting, need to know all of the potential consequences, intended and unintended, should they choose to be represented by the United Auto Workers."

Democrats and union supporters reacted with indignance to what they perceived as a thinly-veiled challenge to workers’ collective-bargaining rights at the behest of state officials.

“It’s an outrage that state Republican leaders would threaten jobs at the Volkswagen plant by claiming they would vote against incentives to their employer if the workers choose to unionize,” said Democratic State Rep. Sherry Jones in a statement released by the UAW. “We should all reject the type of scare tactics and misinformation coming from special interest groups and Republican elected officials.”

Though Volkswagen does not oppose unionization at the Chattanooga plant, a fight has been brewing with outside anti-union groups, who are throwing their weight around in an attempt to influence the union vote at Volkswagen. In November, Working In These Times obtained leaked documents from Matt Patterson, a Grover Norquist-backed political operative, outlining how he intended to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to persuade workers to vote against the UAW. A top anti-union consultant also told In These Times that national anti-union groups were gearing up to fight the UAW at Volkswagen in order to prevent the union from gaining a foothold as it seeks to organize other plants across the South.

Now, this fight appears to be kicking into high gear. According to a February 4 article in the Wall Street Journal, the Center for Worker Freedom, a Grover Norquist-backed anti-union group that is an arm of Norquist's Americans for Tax Reform, has booked radio spots to air anti-union ads and rented 13 billboards around the city to display anti-UAW messages.

One such billboard has the words “United Auto Workers” with the word “auto” crossed out and substituted with the word “Obama.” The billboard also contains a spelling error that provoked ridicule from some labor activists on Twitter: “The UAW spends millions to elect liberal politicans [sic],” the billboard proclaims.

The billboard also directs viewers to the website of the Center for Worker Freedom. One February 5 blog post featured on the site is titled, “UAW Wants Your Guns, Part 1.” In the post, anti-union consultant Matt Patterson writes that Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.), is "only one of many UAW-backed politicians who are openly hostile to the 2nd amendment. You can bet that if the union is successful in organizing Chattanooga’s Volkswagen plant, they will fund an anti-gun agenda in Hamilton County as well.” (In 2012, the UAW gave $10,000 to Rep. Steve Cohen).

Volkswagen worker Michael Cantrell, a supporter of the UAW, believes that this type of political posturing goes too far. “The billboards, advertising and press activities by those not even from our community leave a bad taste in my mouth,” Cantrell wrote in the statement put out by the UAW. “We also placed our trust in elected officials, but they’ve chosen to put their own political interests first and they are interfering in our election too.”

Union supporters fear that the outside interference is beginning to hurt the likelihood of a union victory.

“Right now my feeling is that we are winning but the [anti-union workers] along with their outside help is turning some [people] away that once were supporters” pro-UAW Volkswagen worker Wayne Cliett tells Working In These Times. “I believe we have the votes, [we] just have to make sure everyone of our supporters votes. I have a good feeling about the outcome and at the same time, I'm a little nervous.”

UAW is a website sponsor of In These Times. Sponsors have no role in editorial content.

Can the workers vote with their decision in complete privacy? "Card Check" is not part of the routine is it? Please tell me unions haven't sunk to this level.

Posted by mikeyait on 2014-02-14 10:58:55

Volkswagen is rooted in German industrial culture, and seems to do very well, world-wide, without being hostile to the unions. That doesn't mean either side will have it easy. Whatever, it's their choice. So what are the Republicans scared of? Why do they want to interfere with how a successful corporation is run?

Posted by Wolf Baginski on 2014-02-13 18:28:30

Agreed, but believe the true physical distribution of those voting against their own interests is more of a rural vs. urban issue. I was raised in south-central Washington State, where the politics run more towards East Texas than they do towards Seattle.

Posted by Duncan on 2014-02-13 18:05:01

It's legalized bribery on the state level that should be outlawed by Congress.

Posted by Kevin Schmidt on 2014-02-13 15:55:35

Why are they getting subsidies to begin with?

Posted by hank scorpio on 2014-02-12 11:09:33

i'll fully expect the voters of Tennessee to side with the Speaker and the Majority leader. and i'll expect the prospective workers to reject union, as well. the consistency with which Southerners, in particular, consistently vote against their own best interests has long since ceased to astound me. i now just take it as a given.

Posted by Steve336 on 2014-02-11 20:24:17

About this Blog

"Working In These Times" is dedicated to providing independent and incisive coverage of the labor movement and the struggles of workers to obtain safe, healthy and just workplaces. more