For the last couple of years, moreover, Silver has never shown Obama as having a less-than-even chance of winning, despite some polls that have given Romney an edge.

Unlike almost everyone else who prognosticates about the election, Silver has a highly detailed data-based methodology that averages hundreds of state polls and takes into account factors like economic data.

But we're in "silly season" now, so every time Silver opens his mouth, the ~45% of the country that is rooting for Romney accuses him of being an idiot, being "in the tank" for Obama, or both.

This criticism is asinine. Silver is transparent about the way his model works. The model could be wrong, but Silver has always been clear about the way it works. Those who slam Silver clearly just don't like what his data is showing--that Romney is very likely to lose.

If Obama wins relatively easily, as Silver's model is now predicting, Silver's reputation will become gold-plated, and the traditional pundits who are calling the election a "toss-up" will look like clueless mealy-mouthed wimps.

If Romney wins, however, Silver's reputation will go "poof."

And that's the way it should be.

There is way, way too much consequence-free prognostication these days. Analysts like Silver deserve credit for laying it all on the line.

(For what it's worth, having listened to the logic of Silver and the Silver critics, we'd bet on Silver. He has calmly, patiently, and persuasively nuked every counter-argument that has been thrown at him. And his critics, meanwhile, are now just resorting to logic-free assertions and insults.)