"Snow Day" (February 2000)
A poem by Billy Collins. (With an audio recording by the author)

In the language of the Irish, scholars say, there are a dozen words for "peat." In the language of the Arabs, we've been told, there are many words for "sand." I, for my part, grew up speaking a language in which there are perhaps a hundred terms for snow, and I am not a native of Igloolik.

I learned some of those terms from a man named Mark Williams, a former
ski-lodge operator who is a geographer at the University of Colorado and a
specialist in the properties of snow. "If you're talking about snow crystals
in the atmosphere," he told me recently, "well, then, there are scores of
terms. There are needles and sheaths and columns. There are pyramids. Cups.
Bullets. Plates. Scrolls. Branches. Dendritic crystals. Stellar crystals."
And those are just some of the basic forms. Snow crystals also come in
combinations. Stellar crystals with plates. Dendritic crystals with branches.
Hollow bullets. Bullets with dendrites. Plates with scrolls. Plates with
spatial dendrites. Rimed particles. Rimed needle crystals. Lump graupels.

Graupel-like snow with nonrimed extensions. Some of the names of snow
crystals (branches, needles, bullets) are appropriately suggestive: in high
wind, snow crystals can be as abrasive as sand.

After snow has fallen, the name for it picks up additional qualifiers as it
begins to settle or drift, as heat and cold and wind and moisture and the
snow's own weight begin to make their influence felt. Freshly fallen snow
starts out as what Williams calls an "ice skeleton"—a loose scaffolding of
crystals amid an enormous volume of air. To give his students an idea of the
ratio of snow to air in a fresh snowfall, Williams has them compress a
family-sized loaf of Wonder Bread to its smallest possible size. (It can be
reduced to a two-inch cube.)

In fresh snow air can pass with little obstruction from the atmosphere
through the snowpack to the ground: given life by differences in the
temperature gradient, the snowpack breathes. But time changes that. The snow
may metamorphose into what is called equitemperature, or ET, snow. This is
snow at its most stable, the delicate crystals having matured into hardy
granules in a snowpack of homogeneous temperature. It may turn into
melt-freeze snow, more commonly known as corn snow or spring snow. Where the
snowpack meets the warmer ground, there may form a weak and porous stratum of
what is known as kinetic snow or sugar snow or depth hoar—by whatever name,
the mother of avalanches. If the snow survives for more than a year, it may
begin hardening into something called firn, which is a step on the way to
becoming glacial ice.

I met Mark Williams and a good many of his colleagues at last year's meeting
of an organization called the Western Snow Conference, a gathering that
occurs every spring when the season's snows are more or less over and the
period of snowmelt is well under way. Collectively, the people who attend the
Snow Conference meeting—hydrologists,geographers,
meteorologists,
biologists, chemists, agronomists, utility-company officials, state and
federal government officials, representatives of Indian tribes—are known in
the gray language of official reports as the "snow-resource community." They
are interested in every aspect of the hydrologic cycle of snow, from the
formation of the first crystals to the accumulation of snowpack to the onset
of snowmelt to the release of the last drops of runoff into the Pacific Ocean
or the Gulf of Mexico. They are interested in avalanche theory, in the
seeding of clouds with silver iodide to induce snowstorms, in how to add
certain bacteria to water so that ski resorts can make snow
at higher
temperatures. For decades they have been interested above all in the
following questions, which turn out to be complicated ones: How much snow has
fallen in the western United States in a particular winter? How much water
will it turn into? Where will that water go?

Snow dependency

Snow is a commodity we usually remember for either the pleasures it offers or
the disruptions it causes. We call upon snow, too, for its utility as
metaphor: symbol of purity, uniformity, isolation, protection, transience. We
tend not to think about snow as the crucial variable upon which urban life
and agricultural life in much of the world, particularly the United
States—and especially the American West—happen to depend. Indeed, snow is
largely missing, as the historian Bernard Mergen observes in a forthcoming
study, from recent histories of water policy, in which one would expect it to
play a highly visible role. And yet snow, hardened into glaciers, covers 10
percent of the planet's land area. Fresh snow falls each year on nearly one
square mile of dry land out of every four; in the Northern Hemisphere the
figure is one square mile out of two. Worldwide, at least a third of all the
water used for irrigation comes from snow. In the western United States the
figure is about 75 percent.

What makes snow important is not only its volume but also its relative
dependability. Much of the West is in a state of drought or
near-drought,
with snowfall having been below normal in seven of the past eight years. In
general, though, snow can be far more reliably counted upon to fall in
substantial amounts in the mountains during wintertime than rain can be
counted upon to fall in the spring and summertime. And snowmelt flows onto
the scene at nearly the most useful time of year, having been stored at high
altitudes until the weather warms and the demands of agriculture begin to
make themselves felt. It is snow that powers the great rivers of the
West—the Colorado, the Rio Grande, the Columbia, the Missouri—on their long
journeys through sometimes parched or semi-arid terrain, ribbons of brown and
silver that at times enverdure entire basins, at times support the merest
Nilotic fringe of green. How much water does the West's winter snow turn
into? The snowmelt that finds its way into the Columbia River alone in an
average year comes to 26 trillion gallons, which is 81 million
acre-feet—enough to cover all of Kansas in knee-deep water, or to raise Lake
Michigan by almost six feet.

The Western Snow Conference typically holds its meetings someplace in sight
of the mountains, where in springtime one can have a ready glimpse of snow. I
was invited to attend the sixty-second annual conference, in Santa Fe, New
Mexico, by a friend who is a hydrologist in California. I'm not sure why the
prospect held such appeal, unless it is simply that snow is my favorite kind
of weather. The first article I ever published, on a small printing press
given to me on a snowy Christmas when I was six or seven, consisted of what
was meant to be a report on snow depth in inches, and was distributed to
neighbors. It read, in its entirety: "The snow 15." Snow seems to come into
my life in the form of memorable coincidences. The Horatian ode "Diffugere
nives . . . ," about the melting of snow in springtime, was the first piece
of Latin verse I ever translated completely on my own (it appeared on a
test), an achievement that occurred at roughly the same time as my first
reading of James
Joyce's short story "The
Dead," whose most famous words, in
the haunting conclusion, are "snow was general all over Ireland." Snow makes
me feel as snug as a vole. There were ten major snowstorms in my region of
New England last winter, and I contentedly wrote a check to the snowplow man
each time.

The focus of the Western Snow Conference's Santa Fe meeting was "Climate
Change Effects on Snowmelt Water Supply," a big and important subject, but
that was by no means the whole agenda. "Northern Latitude Snow Pillow
Installation Procedures." "Snow Accumulation and Ablation Under Fire-altered
Lodgepole Pine Forest Canopies." "Snow Chemistry and Physics of the Mogollon
Rim in Arizona." There was
something here, I realized, for even the most
jaded of tastes. At lectures and in associated readings I picked up such
arcane pieces of information as that a two-foot square of snow ten inches
deep contains about a million snowflakes, and that if the potential
precipitation in the earth's atmosphere at any given moment fell all at once,
it would cover the entire surface of the planet to a depth of one inch. I was
pleased to observe that, as with any professional group that has reached a
certain level of maturity, the membership of the Western Snow Conference
includes people who display what might be called occupational
anthroponymy—that is, whose names resonate with their line of work. I ran
into a Phyllis Snow and a Neil Berg, and discovered that a type of diagram
used to show inflows and outflows from reservoirs was devised by a man named
Rippl.

During my days at the Snow Conference meeting I also grew to admire the pluck
and ingenuity of those charged with keeping track of our snow. It has been
nearly ninety years since James E. Church fashioned his first snow tubes and
began taking wintertime measurements in the mountains of Nevada. Some things
haven't changed very much since that time, and some have changed profoundly.

Falling crystals

''There is no material of engineering significance that displays the
bewildering complexities of snow." I came across that matter-of-fact
statement in the Handbook of Snow, an invaluable if glacially paced
compendium edited by the eminent Canadian hydrologists D. M. Gray and D. H.
Male. The formation of snow begins when water vapor or a supercooled droplet
of water forms an ice crystal, almost always hexagonal in shape, around a
nucleus consisting of one of the thousands of minute aerosol particles to be
found in each cubic centimeter of the lower atmosphere—clay silicate,
perhaps, or bits of volcanic
ash, or material of extraterrestrial origin.
From that moment on, the life of an ice crystal can be played out in various
ways. The crystal may fall to the ground in its original form, as it does in
the intensely cold regions of the Arctic
and Antarctic. Or, more frequently,
the ice crystal may grow into a snow crystal, gaining substance by means of
sublimation—water vapor turning directly into ice, without passing through a
liquid stage. Its shape, or "habit," will be determined mostly by temperature
and the amount of water vapor in the air. As snow crystals descend, they may
meet up with one another, forming aggregations. We know these as snowflakes.
Or a snow crystal may in its descent encounter supercooled water droplets.
Riming can then occur, as the droplets freeze immediately upon contact with a
solid body. If the riming is substantial, the crystal may become graupel, or
snow pellets.

All this activity has a powerful cleansing effect on the
atmosphere—"washout" and "snowout," as two of the associated processes are
called. A heavy snowstorm gathers particulate matter to itself and drags it
to the ground, thereby preserving, until the snow melts, a sample of the
atmospheric chemistry prevailing when that particular snowstorm began—a
sample that speaks of climatic conditions generally and may speak more
specifically of pollution. In the remote interior of Greenland, where the
deposits of snowstorms do not disappear, such records go back a long way. A
few years ago researchers at the Greenland Icecore Project drilled a hole
through the Greenland icecap all the way to bedrock and extracted a core of
ice that, if reassembled, would be close to two miles long. The ice at the
bottom of the borehole is believed to have been formed from snow that fell
some 200,000 years ago.

The symmetry of ice crystals was commented upon by the Chinese in the second
century B.C. Europeans had recorded the same observation at least by the
Middle Ages. The intellectual pedigree of snow scholarship in the West is
distinguished. The Dominican scholastic Albertus Magnus wrote about snow
crystals in the thirteenth century. At the beginning of the seventeenth
century the same subject beguiled Johannes Kepler. "There must be some
definite cause," he wrote in 1609, shortly after making the discovery that
the planets travel not in circles but in ellipses, "why, whenever snow begins
to fall, its initial formation invariably displays the shape of a
six-cornered starlet. For if it happens by chance, why do they not fall just
as well with five corners or with seven?" In his pamphlet Kepler drew
parallels with honeycombs and the pattern of seeds inside pomegranates, but
was unable to explain the flakes' hexagonal form. Somewhat later Rene
Descartes discerned that branches sprout off each side of the stems of
hexagonal snowflakes at an angle of 60 degrees, with an angle of 120 degrees
thus separating the branches themselves. The process is complex, but the
hexagonal shape of snowflakes essentially reflects the underlying atomic
structure of water. One suspects that even the skeptic Descartes would have
offered up a Te Deum had he known that the two hydrogen atoms in a molecule
of water branch off the oxygen atom with about 120 degrees of separation.

For all the scientific awareness of the symmetrical character of snow
crystals, the ubiquity of their popular image—the one we see in children's
paper cutouts and on bags of ice and signs for motels that have
air-conditioning—is a relatively recent phenomenon. What snowflakes actually
looked like was not widely known until the middle of the nineteenth century,
when the book Cloud Crystals, with sketches by "A Lady," was published in the
United States. The lady had caught snowflakes on a black surface and then
observed them with a magnifying glass. In 1885 Wilson Alwyn ("Snowflake")
Bentley, of Jericho, Vermont,
began taking photographs of snowflakes through
a microscope. Thousands of Bentley's photomicrographs were eventually
collected in his book Snow Crystals (1931). The fact that not one of the
snowflakes photographed by Bentley was identical to another is probably the
basis for the idea that no two snowflakes are ever exactly the same—an idea
that is in fact unverifiable.

Into the tubes

Aesthetics did not drive snow science. Even as Wilson Bentley was peering
through the camera bellows of his photomicrograph, Americans by the millions
were continuing to settle the lands beyond the Mississippi. From
1870 to 1910
the population of California
grew by 325 percent. During the same period the
population of the eleven western states as a whole grew by 600 percent. The
newcomers confronted firsthand a truth about the West presciently stated by
the explorer and naturalist John Wesley Powell: "In the whole region, land as
mere land is of no value. What is really valuable is the water privilege."
Unlike water in the East, water in the West could not be taken for granted;
rainfall was in many places nonexistent or seasonal. It was no secret that
the snow that fell in wintertime turned into most of the water that appeared
in spring—albeit unpredictably in terms of volume and timing. What if some
element of predictability was possible? Imagine the consequences for the
building and management of reservoirs, the control of flooding, the rational
allocation of water among various kinds of users.

Riverine data in some form have been collected by all civilizations, so
essential are rivers to commerce and agriculture. Records of the annual
high-water level of the Nile,
for example, are complete all the way back to
A.D. 622, save for one large gap in the early modern period. The U.S.
government in the mid-1800s began attempting to gather reliable
meteorological information on its rapidly expanding and geographically
diverse domains, and by the turn of the century runoff data in the form of
hydrographs existed for many of the important western rivers. It occurred to
a number of investigators that if, by means of a crude model, one could
correlate, year after year, the size of the snowpack at the moment of its
greatest extent—the moment of what is now called "ripeness"—with the
streamflow, then one would have a powerful forecasting tool. Moreover, if one
measured the snowpack not only at the moment of greatest extent, which
usually occurs in April, but also in March, February, and January, and kept
detailed annual records, one might even be able, eventually, to make a
preliminary forecast as early as midwinter, based on past trends. Of course,
even if this methodology worked to perfection, it would never reveal how much
snow had actually fallen or how much water that snow actually contained. It
could, however, reveal that this year's runoff had a certain probability of
being, say, roughly 20 percent less than average, or 15 percent more.

That, at any rate, was the idea entertained at the turn of the century by,
among others, James E. Church, an active outdoorsman who was a professor of
Latin and Greek at
the University of
Nevada, in Reno. Church was animated in
part by the situation of Lake Tahoe,
which epitomized the competition for
water in the West. In this case the competition involved farmers downstream,
who needed the lake's water to irrigate their crops; a hydroelectric-power
company, which operated several power plants on the Truckee River, whose
source is Lake Tahoe; property owners on the lake, who wanted its level to
remain constant; and the Paiute Indians, who by federal treaty were
guaranteed a certain amount of Tahoe water to feed their Pyramid Lake. Being
able to predict snowmelt would simplify the management of the lake.

Because evaluating water content was his aim, and because the water content
of snow varies widely from storm to storm and even within the context of a
single "weather event," Church contended that a simple depth measurement
would probably not suffice. The old rule of thumb for snow-to-water
conversion is that ten inches of "average" newly fallen snow make for about
one inch of water, but some snow is much wetter and some is much drier. In
Colorado, famous among skiers for its powder, twenty inches of snow or more
may be needed to produce one inch of water. The samples that Church required
in order to create a historical index had to reflect the water content, the
"snow-water equivalent." Church therefore employed a stainless-steel
cylinder, which he forced through the snow to extract samples from the
surface of the snow to the ground. Once obtained, the samples would be
weighed, weight being a reliable index of water content. Church's extraction
instrument, which was more than six feet long, and onto which extensions
could be screwed, came to be known as the Mount Rose sampler, after the
mountain where he conducted his first surveys. Subsequent models have been
waxed, polished, baked with silicon, and provided with teeth, and the
stainless steel has given way to aluminum, but their design remains based on
the original.

By 1911 Church and a U.S. Weather Bureau official named J. Cecil Alter were
independently making systematic snow surveys, Church around Tahoe and Alter
in the watershed around Great
Salt Lake. They each developed the idea of the
"snow course"—a series of sampling sites strung across a short distance, in
order to reduce distortions caused by wind and drift. The very same sites,
identified by tall markers, would be surveyed year after year, to ensure that
the data were truly comparable. The surveyors' efforts were focused on the
higher elevations, where there were no meteorological stations of any kind,
and where, from the moment of first snowfall to the onset of spring thaw, the
snowpack is less apt to melt: it is a more or less steadily accumulating
resource. The altitude, though, brought problems of accessibility. Church and
Alter and those who came after them had to trudge up to the snow courses on
snowshoes and skis. There were blizzards to contend with. There were
avalanches, and in the spring there were bears. I asked one veteran snow
surveyor, Douglas Powell—a man who, as a graduate student, knew James
Church, and who estimates that he has spent 1,600 days of his life in the
high country on skis—if "grueling" was a word that accurately described the
servicing of a snow course. He said no, the word he would use was
"demanding," and he went on to tell about how once, in 1969, when he was
conducting a survey in the Sierra Nevada, it snowed 150 inches in two days.
Powell said, "All right, maybe grueling."

Laws unto themselves

As the idea of snow surveys caught on, promoted first by private interests
and universities, then by state governments, and ultimately by the federal
government, with James Church playing the proselytizing role of Saint Paul,
snow courses began to spread throughout the western mountains. With them came
a modest support structure. Photographs from the 1930s and 1940s show the log
cabins built to sustain snow surveyors on weeklong treks through alpine
country; many of the cabins were topped by a wooden tower twenty or thirty
feet high—the "Santa Claus chimney." In late winter the snow would often be
so high that only a door at the top of the chimney offered access to the snug
safety of the cabin deep below. Besides physical comfort there was the
comfort offered by a professional guild: the Western Snow Conference was
established in 1933. (An Eastern Snow Conference was established several
years later; its focus is somewhat less on snow as a resource, somewhat more
on snow as a nuisance.)

Snow courses proliferated in the West—there were about a thousand of them by
1940—because the data they provided and the models they made possible proved
useful. The models were not subtle. They were at first based solely on the
amount of snow on the ground, with the data being used in an equation that
was found, through trial and error, to produce a semi-satisfactory result. It
was not long, however, before hydrologists realized that every basin, every
watershed, worked in a different way. George D. Clyde, a Utah governor and
one of the great names in American hydrology, put it this way: "Each
watershed seems to be a law unto itself." Patterns of precipitation in the
mountains of the Northwest turned out to be vastly different from those in
the mountains of the Southwest. The assumption that the depth of the alpine
snowpack greatly exceeded that of the snowpack at lower elevations proved to
be correct in most places, but often not in Arizona or California. In Nevada
the relationship was sometimes turned on its head: it all depended on whether
storms tended to come in low or high, and on what stood in their way.

New variables had to be added. One of the first was soil moisture at the time
of the first snow. If the weather had been unusually dry, much of the spring
snowmelt would drain into the ground, and would not immediately show up in
streamflow; unexpected shortages would occur. If it had been unusually wet,
not only would most of the water in the snow cover run off but the increased
contribution from water in the soil might build streamflows of a size no one
had anticipated. Other factors, too, needed to be considered—elevation, wind
speed, air temperature, radiation, slope of terrain, extent of snow cover,
extent of tree cover, spring precipitation. As these were gradually
incorporated into models, the models began to look more and more like
something that aspired to show conceptually how the natural world really
worked.

That process would take decades—indeed, is still going on, the state of the
art currently being represented by the National Weather
Service's powerful
and intricate River Forecast System model. Even in their primitive state,
though, snow-water forecasts were valuable. They could certainly warn of
impending extremes—vast oversupply and vast undersupply. The record over the
years buoyed confidence in reliability, and water commissioners took heed.
Bankers reviewed the forecasts before deciding how much credit to extend to
farmers. Farmers adjusted their acreage accordingly. In Utah the 1934 spring
forecast by George D. Clyde indicated that streamflows in the state would run
at 25 to 50 percent of normal; farmers scaled back their planting and
ranchers moved their cattle to less arid grazing lands out of state, averting
disaster in what would be remembered in other states as the year that brought
on the Dust Bowl.

It was largely owing to the experience of 1934 that the federal government
began to support and coordinate snow-survey work in the western states, and
to conduct snow surveys of its own—a role the Soil Conservation Service took
on in 1939 and retains to this day. The Depression era also witnessed a vast
amount of spending on dams, reservoirs, irrigation canals—public works that
harnessed the annual snowmelt but made forecasts of its volume all the more
important. People in the eastern United States and even many in the West
don't necessarily appreciate the intricate web of snowmelt-filled waterworks
that makes the western United States possible. The Colorado River alone today
feeds 1,470 reservoirs.

Will infrastructure-building and management of the interior ever again seem
as heroic and progressive as they did during the 1930s? Life magazine, the
television of its time, sent photographers to record snow surveyors on the
job, following R. A. ("Arch") Work, one of the founding fathers of the SCS
system, and a ranger named Jack Frost (!) as they trekked from course to
course high in the Cascades. Looking back wistfully on this period, the
author of one engineering textbook calls it "the First Golden Age of
Hydrology."

Better data, better models

I sat down for an hour at the Snow Conference meeting with Eugene L. Peck,
who is the president of a hydrological engineering firm called Hydex, and who
for more than three decades was on the hydrological staff of the National
Weather Service; his career there culminated with the directorship of the
Hydrologic Research Laboratory. When I asked him how deep his roots went in
American hydrology, he replied, "I had breakfast with J. E. Church at the
meeting of the Western Snow Conference in 1950." The National Weather Service
and the Soil Conservation Service, which collect snow data in different ways
and cooperate on streamflow forecasts, had numerous disputes in decades past
over issues of procedure and turf. Peck, who spent almost all of his career
doing the basic work of hydrology in the western states—collecting data,
improving models, mapping, forecasting—seems to remember them all. He may
even have started a few.

I had asked Peck if he could give me a capsule history of snow forecasting in
America, and he arrived with several pieces of yellow legal paper, a
chronology sketched out from memory. The entries began with "1907-1910—J.
Cecil Alter using stove pipe for cutter, Mill Creek nr SLC, UT" and went
through "1950s—Competition between SCS & NWS, many problems but made for
better forecasts," up through "1969-78—Development of airborne gamma
radiation to measure water equivalent of snow cover," and kept on going.

Later Peck showed me a few items of historical interest: a half dozen
delicate photographic negatives on glass, depicting snow-survey stations at
Wagon Wheel Gap, in Colorado, during the 1920s; a sere and brittle copy of
Volume 1, Number 1 (1920) of the Bulletin of the American Meteorological
Society; a copy, preserved in a plastic sleeve, of a blue-bound pamphlet
titled Snow Surveying: USDA Miscellaneous Publication No. 380 (1940), which
was the first official manual for snow surveyors; and, typed on translucent
onionskin paper, corrected by hand, the text of a lecture by J. Cecil Alter,
"Read before the Utah Academy of Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah, Saturday,
April 3, 1926." I picked up the last of these items with a certain reverence.
I felt as if I were touching one of the Dead
Sea Scrolls of hydrology.

Peck, though, is no antiquarian. He is involved in, among other things,
NASA's boreas project, which is an
ambitious attempt to create a
meteorological and hydrological portrait of large parts of Canada —-a portion
of the continent whose freshwater resources in the form of snowmelt go
largely uncaptured. In our conversations about snow and the water it contains
Peck kept coming back to one basic point: that snowmelt forecasting still
depends on having some sort of data and some sort of model to plug the data
into. The story of forecasting, then, is the story of a search for better
data and better models.

There has from the beginning been a school, for example, that held that data
gathered from precipitation gauges—open buckets, basically—could be used to
predict streamflow as reliably as data from snow surveys done with snow
tubes. Snow-tube surveys did have obvious disadvantages. As noted, they were
arduous. They were labor-intensive and therefore costly. And frequently snow
courses were sited in areas that, for one reason or another, proved
unrepresentative of the actual snowpack. Precipitation gauges were easier to
get to—they tended to be at lower elevations—and could even be automated.
They could provide information about rain as well as snow. But precipitation
gauges had drawbacks too. Even when they were equipped with shields, for
example, high winds would impel much snow laterally across the orifice, in a
process called eddying. The result was "undercatch": the gauges would
underreport the volume of snow.

Precipitation gauges, too, can be sited in unrepresentative areas, a problem
occasionally abetted by human agency. Peck told the story of the weather
station in Shoshone, Colorado, whose precipitation-gauge data had been so
erratic and variable that Peck, who at the time was the head of the National
Weather Service's water-supply forecast unit, in Salt Lake City, decided to
visit the place and talk to the man who had run it for years and years. "I
found the can," Peck said. "It was hooked onto a metal stairway where the
snow could slide into it off the roof. But precip couldn't get in there, it
was up so close to the building. So I said to the old guy, 'Well, how long's
it been there?' And he said, 'Actually, quite a while. You know, originally
it was out by the highway, in the thirties.' And I said, 'What happened?' And
he said, 'Everything went fine—it really was a good place—except when the
snowblowers on the highway began blowing snow over it and it started filling
up. So we decided to move it. We moved it behind the station, but the tree
grew up and was covering it. So we moved it up by the school ground. But that
didn't work too well, because we started getting precipitation when there was
no precipitation. Kids were using it for a urinal.'"

Beginning in the 1960s, Peck went on, forecasters began experimenting with a
device called a snow pillow. A snow pillow looks like a very large ravioli
made of neoprene rubber or pliable metal. It is a square, perhaps six to ten
feet on a side, and is filled with antifreeze. As snow falls and the snowpack
gets heavier, the pillow is compressed; the degree of compression, reflecting
the weight of the water above, is communicated by radio to a monitoring
station. One great advantage of snow pillows is that they can be placed
securely in remote locations, where they will transmit data throughout the
winter. But they are prey to a variety of ailments. One is called "bridging":
periods of thaw or rain followed by a freeze can result in the creation of a
reinforced support layer or even a static frozen dome over the pillow, which
effectively tricks it into thinking that no further accumulation has occurred
when it has.

My conversation with Peck was suspended when a lecture began on the subject
of the algae that live in snow and feed on the nutrients in it. The organic
material the algae excrete may support colonies of bacteria, and the algae
themselves serve as food for several varieties of snowworms. Sometimes algae
are so prevalent that the snow turns red or yellow or blue; the colored snow
may exude the smell of fresh watermelon. The lecture revealed one more novel
element in the unfolding dynamic of snow—the fact that snow is an ecosystem.
By the time the lecture began, Peck had gotten as far on his sheets of legal
paper as "1979—Thomas Carroll to direct operational program in
Minneapolis, MN." He was, it seemed
clear, just getting going.

The strategic snow command

There is a certain cast to the people who attend meetings of the Western Snow
Conference. It is not, of course, exhibited universally, though I suspect
that it would clearly emerge if one were somehow to add everyone together and
take the mean. They are mostly men and mostly at the lower end of middle age.
They seem to be independent-minded, friendly, physically fit. They are given
to calling precipitation "precip," and partial to neatly trimmed facial hair
and the kind of casual clothing one associates with people who do enlightened
and brainy things outdoors. Formality never exceeds a bolo tie, the color of
whose string indicates regional affiliation. The design of the clasp tends to
reflect the year of one's first attendance at the Snow Conference; there were
clasps around me going back to the 1940s.

One senses that there may be something of a division inside the Western Snow
Conference between a younger generation that holds a firm faith in what new
technology can accomplish and an older generation that idealizes tramping
about in snowshoes with a Mount Rose sampler. Even so, the nature of the work
brings out a bit of the mountain man in almost everyone. I cautioned one
hydrologist, who was about to make the harrowing drive up the mesa to nearby
Los Alamos, "Hold on to your
hat. It's pretty
steep." He looked at me as if to say, "I could do steep in my sleep."

No one intends to give up the traditional manual outdoor snow surveys. Not
only are they part of the romance that drew many people into the field to
begin with, but, more important, they contribute an indispensable something
for which, in this age of remote sensing, a specialized term has been
developed: "ground truth." With respect to the specific variable of water
content, snow surveys set a standard that other methods can only measure
themselves against. Many of James Church's original snow-survey courses in
the Sierra Nevada are loyally maintained to this day.

Still, the forecasting business has made some important advances during the
past few decades (a period known to some as the Second Golden Age of
Hydrology). In addition to the 1,600 or so traditional mountain snow courses
that the Soil Conservation Service and other agencies continue to run, the
SCS operates 550 SNOTEL (for "snow telemetry") sites in mountainous areas
throughout the West, each with an array of snow pillows, precipitation
gauges, and sensors to record temperature and sometimes other variables, such
as wind speed and soil moisture. Information is brought back to headquarters
by means of "meteor-burst transmission": a request signal from one of the two
SNOTEL master stations is bounced to remote sites not off a satellite but off
the ionized trails of some of the billions of tiny meteors that enter the
earth's atmosphere every day; the remote stations bounce back their most
recent data in the same way. Forecasting agencies still send out on paper
monthly state-by-state bulletins, but increasingly all the relevant data is
available electronically, often in real time or near-real time.

Actually, the term "data" is beginning to sound a little limited. The
National Weather Service in its publications refers to what it inclusively
calls "airborne and satellite snow-cover products." I spoke with Thomas
Carroll, who was the chairman of the executive committee of the Santa Fe
meeting, and who since 1979 has been the director of the weather service's
National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center, which is based in
Minneapolis. For much of North America the center functions as a kind of
Strategic Snow Command. The NWS, Carroll said, runs snow courses after a
fashion—more than 1,850 of them, in twenty-six states and seven Canadian
provinces. Each one is about ten miles long and is monitored by aircraft. The
basic idea behind these very long snow courses is relatively simple. The
earth's surface emits natural gamma radiation from trace elements of
potassium, uranium, and thorium in the soil. That radiation is attenuated by
the amount of water in the snow. An estimate of water content can be obtained
along any of the established flight lines by comparing a background reading
previously made over bare ground with a fresh reading made over the same
piece of ground under snow.

There are limitations. "All methodologies have deficiencies," Carroll said,
and he frankly ticked off the ones that characterize his flight-line network.
"One, we have to fly close to the ground —five hundred feet—so we can only
fly in good weather. Two, flying close to the ground means that terrain is
also a problem. We can do some mountain areas, but we can't do others. Three,
when the snowpack gets above eight, ten, twelve feet, the gamma-radiation
technique turns to mush. The biggest limitation of all is the cost. It takes
a lot of money to fly airplanes."

The snow-water-equivalent estimates from overflights, like those derived from
any snow course, represent only samples. But already it is possible to merge,
using computer models, sample surveys of every kind with continent-wide
snow-cover imaging obtained by microwaves from satellites. The images will be
getting better. Last October the space shuttle Endeavour made its second
series of experimental investigations (the first was in April) with a new
radar system capable of looking at the snowpack. A powerful multipurpose
remote-sensing platform called the Earth Observing System, consisting of
several integrated satellites, is scheduled to go into operation in 1998,
with a $7 billion array of earth-monitoring equipment that will make the
present Landsat satellite seem like a stereoscope in a Victorian parlor.

As we discussed satellites, Tom Carroll repeated, "All methodologies have
deficiencies." The advantage of microwaves, Carroll said, is that they can
see through clouds. The disadvantage is that they can show with confidence
only the areal extent of the snowpack. They are much less able, given the
present state of technology, to extract accurate information about water
content. "That's a big problem," Carroll said. "Big problem." Even so, he
went on, just being able to see the areal extent of the snow cover can make
an important difference. Consider what happened in 1983 in the Colorado River
basin. Forecasters knew from sampling that the water content of the snowpack
was running about 200 percent of normal—"There was a lot of snow all over
the shop"—and were expecting much more than the usual runoff. Typically what
happens in the West is that the lower elevations warm up before the higher
elevations, and the runoff is therefore gradual, drawn out over time: what is
known as a "soft landing." In 1983 there was very little early-spring runoff.
Scattered local reports indicated that the lower snowpack was still in place,
but no one had any idea of the vast size of the phenomenon. The weather
stayed cold all through the spring, and then a weather system moved in and
warmed the entire snowpack all at once. Big problem. "If we'd had a program
then to monitor areal extent of snow cover," Carroll said, "we'd have noticed
the anomalies in the lower elevations. We could have been more responsive."

Being "responsive" in this case would have meant releasing water from
reservoirs downstream to accommodate the coming torrent. As it was, in 1983
the Colorado River spilled over the top of the Hoover Dam, creating a western
version of Niagara Falls. Flooding in the Colorado basin did
not end until
autumn. Looking back at newspaper accounts, I noted with satisfaction that
the federal official charged with overseeing the Colorado River dams was
named Plummer.

The future of snow

For all the improvements in detection, though, there remains something
fundamentally unsatisfying about the forecasting endeavor. One hydrologist I
met at the Snow Conference meeting resorted to a medical analogy. We have
gone, he said, from the equivalent of Laennec's wooden tube to the
stethoscope to the electrocardiogram in the space of a generation, but, as
with the human body, we still don't know many fundamental things about snow.
Nor do we understand its relation to weather and to climate—the dynamics of
climate being one of the perennials on the "must figure out" list of science.
And although, as in medicine, we can predict the likely course and
consequence of certain conditions once they arrive, we find it a lot harder
to predict the onset of many of those conditions very far in advance.

That is one of the tasks for the future. The Snow Conference meeting offered
glimpses of some avenues of research. One paper speculated about a possible
relationship between the size of the Himalayan snowpack in a given year and
the size and timing of the subsequent monsoon. Another paper sought to
document a link between the periodic El Nino warming trend and diminished
snowfall in the Pacific Northwest, a link that would have practical
significance for forecasters if the onset of El Nino could consistently be
determined in advance. (I overheard someone behind me snort and say, "Yeah,
but try telling water-conservation officials that you think there's going to
be a shortage because of the barometric pressure in Tahiti.") Several papers
looked ahead to what would probably happen to precipitation and snowmelt in
certain locales in the event of global warming. One of them, which assumed a
3 degrees Celsius increase in average temperature, concluded that the volume
of precipitation in the Sierra Nevada would not be much affected but the
timing of the snowmelt would: nearly a third of the precipitation that would
ordinarily appear as runoff in springtime, when farmers can use it right
away, would appear as runoff in wintertime instead, meaning significant
losses for watersheds that don't have adequate means of storage.

Even as global climate and large-scale circulation patterns affect snowfall,
snowfall has a considerable impact in return, given that gains and losses of
energy in the atmosphere are what swirl air masses around the planet. There
is no natural surface on earth with a higher albedo—reflective power—than
fresh snow. A field of planted farmland may reflect back as little as three
percent of shortwave solar radiation. The Mojave Desert may reflect as much
as 30 percent, sea ice as much as 40 percent. Fresh snow may reflect fully 95
percent. Rather than being retained as heat, the sun's energy is sent back
where it came from. The melting of a winter's worth of snow takes so much
energy that even though the sun in the Northern Hemisphere is at its most
intense in June, the atmosphere remains cooler than it "ought" to be until
August.

All the earth sciences began as applied sciences, spurred by basic
considerations of economics and survival. In helping to organize the Western
Snow Conference, James E. Church expressed the hope that the study of snow
might be broadened beyond the pragmatic and the empirical. To some extent
this is happening. Snow studies are, of course, still pragmatic, sometimes in
ways that those in the so-called progressive conservation movement of the
late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries would never have anticipated.
In the current period of drought, for instance, utility companies and water
authorities are conducting cloud-seeding experiments in many areas of the
West as part of an attempt to see if more snow can be put on the peaks. (Such
efforts in the past resulted in some well-publicized legal tangles when snow
suddenly fell in an unexpected place.) Snowmelt forecasting will also play a
big role as states throughout the West, under various mandates, begin to
restore depleted rivers and lakes. To the list of competing uses for the
snowpack's water, in other words, we must now add another.

As I prepared to leave Santa Fe, the space shuttle Endeavour was high
overhead, in the midst of a successful ten-day test of its new radar. I drove
north out of town to the banks of the Rio Grande, which flows through a broad
plain between the Jemez and the Sangre de Cristo mountains. The snow in the
lower elevations had begun to melt, and the river, though it was still
shallow and slow-moving, had begun to rise. According to the newspaper that
morning, the Sangre de Cristo Water Company's reservoirs in the Santa Fe
Canyon, which trap the spring snowmelt and were now nearly full, would be
releasing water into the Rio Grande in a matter of weeks. Looking up, I could
see the alpine snowpack—still intact, and, on average, about ten feet deep,
according to information I had received from the Soil Conservation Service.
Or, as I might have put it at another time, "The snow 120." The cottonwoods
along the Rio Grande displayed the haze of fuzzy lime-green they briefly
exhibit every spring, reminding me that this was exactly the time of year
that Horace had been writing about: "The snows have dispersed, now grass
returns to the fields and leaves to the trees."

All those former needles and sheaths, those cups and bullets, those dendrites
and stellar crystals—they were dispersed, or dispersing, to be sure. But,
fortunately for all of us, they would be back.

Most Popular

Should you drink more coffee? Should you take melatonin? Can you train yourself to need less sleep? A physician’s guide to sleep in a stressful age.

During residency, Iworked hospital shifts that could last 36 hours, without sleep, often without breaks of more than a few minutes. Even writing this now, it sounds to me like I’m bragging or laying claim to some fortitude of character. I can’t think of another type of self-injury that might be similarly lauded, except maybe binge drinking. Technically the shifts were 30 hours, the mandatory limit imposed by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, but we stayed longer because people kept getting sick. Being a doctor is supposed to be about putting other people’s needs before your own. Our job was to power through.

The shifts usually felt shorter than they were, because they were so hectic. There was always a new patient in the emergency room who needed to be admitted, or a staff member on the eighth floor (which was full of late-stage terminally ill people) who needed me to fill out a death certificate. Sleep deprivation manifested as bouts of anger and despair mixed in with some euphoria, along with other sensations I’ve not had before or since. I remember once sitting with the family of a patient in critical condition, discussing an advance directive—the terms defining what the patient would want done were his heart to stop, which seemed likely to happen at any minute. Would he want to have chest compressions, electrical shocks, a breathing tube? In the middle of this, I had to look straight down at the chart in my lap, because I was laughing. This was the least funny scenario possible. I was experiencing a physical reaction unrelated to anything I knew to be happening in my mind. There is a type of seizure, called a gelastic seizure, during which the seizing person appears to be laughing—but I don’t think that was it. I think it was plain old delirium. It was mortifying, though no one seemed to notice.

A report will be shared with lawmakers before Trump’s inauguration, a top advisor said Friday.

President Obama has asked intelligence officials to perform a “full review” of election-related hacking, a top advisor told reporters Friday. The White House will share a report of its findings with lawmakers before Obama leaves office on January 20, 2017, she said.

Lisa Monaco, the president’s advisor for homeland security, made the comments at a Christian Science Monitor event. They were first reported by Politico and The Hill.

Last week, every Democrat (and a Democrat-aligned Independent) on the Senate Intelligence Committee called on the White House to declassify and release more information about Russia’s involvement in the U.S. elections. It’s not clear whether the review announced Friday is connected to the letter from the committee members.

His paranoid style paved the road for Trumpism. Now he fears what’s been unleashed.

Glenn Beck looks like the dad in a Disney movie. He’s earnest, geeky, pink, and slightly bulbous. His idea of salty language is bullcrap.

The atmosphere at Beck’s Mercury Studios, outside Dallas, is similarly soothing, provided you ignore the references to genocide and civilizational collapse. In October, when most commentators considered a Donald Trump presidency a remote possibility, I followed audience members onto the set of The Glenn Beck Program, which airs on Beck’s website, theblaze.com. On the way, we passed through a life-size replica of the Oval Office as it might look if inhabited by a President Beck, complete with a portrait of Ronald Reagan and a large Norman Rockwell print of a Boy Scout.

“Well, you’re just special. You’re American,” remarked my colleague, smirking from across the coffee table. My other Finnish coworkers, from the school in Helsinki where I teach, nodded in agreement. They had just finished critiquing one of my habits, and they could see that I was on the defensive.

I threw my hands up and snapped, “You’re accusing me of being too friendly? Is that really such a bad thing?”

“Well, when I greet a colleague, I keep track,” she retorted, “so I don’t greet them again during the day!” Another chimed in, “That’s the same for me, too!”

Unbelievable, I thought. According to them, I’m too generous with my hellos.

When I told them I would do my best to greet them just once every day, they told me not to change my ways. They said they understood me. But the thing is, now that I’ve viewed myself from their perspective, I’m not sure I want to remain the same. Change isn’t a bad thing. And since moving to Finland two years ago, I’ve kicked a few bad American habits.

Why the ingrained expectation that women should desire to become parents is unhealthy

In 2008, Nebraska decriminalized child abandonment. The move was part of a "safe haven" law designed to address increased rates of infanticide in the state. Like other safe-haven laws, parents in Nebraska who felt unprepared to care for their babies could drop them off in a designated location without fear of arrest and prosecution. But legislators made a major logistical error: They failed to implement an age limitation for dropped-off children.

Within just weeks of the law passing, parents started dropping off their kids. But here's the rub: None of them were infants. A couple of months in, 36 children had been left in state hospitals and police stations. Twenty-two of the children were over 13 years old. A 51-year-old grandmother dropped off a 12-year-old boy. One father dropped off his entire family -- nine children from ages one to 17. Others drove from neighboring states to drop off their children once they heard that they could abandon them without repercussion.

Why did Trump’s choice for national-security advisor perform so well in the war on terror, only to find himself forced out of the Defense Intelligence Agency?

How does a man like retired Lieutenant General Mike Flynn—who spent his life sifting through information and parsing reports, separating rumor and innuendo from actionable intelligence—come to promote conspiracy theories on social media?

Perhaps it’s less Flynn who’s changed than that the circumstances in which he finds himself—thriving in some roles, and flailing in others.

In diagnostic testing, there’s a basic distinction between sensitivity, or the ability to identify positive results, and specificity, the ability to exclude negative ones. A test with high specificity may avoid generating false positives, but at the price of missing many diagnoses. One with high sensitivity may catch those tricky diagnoses, but also generate false positives along the way. Some people seem to sift through information with high sensitivity, but low specificity—spotting connections that others can’t, and perhaps some that aren’t even there.

The president-elect has chosen Andrew Puzder, a vocal critic of minimum-wage hikes and new overtime rules.

Updated on December 9, 2016

President-Elect Donald Trump announced Thursday evening that he picked Andrew Puzder, the CEO of CKE Restaurants, which owns fast-food chains Carl’s Jr. and Hardee’s, to lead the U.S. Department of Labor. Puzder—like several of Trump’s other nominees—is a multi-millionaire and Washington outsider who served as an adviser and fundraiser during the presidential campaign. While there’s no political record to indicate how Puzder thinks about the labor market, his remarks as a business executive give some indication of the stances he’ll take on several important labor issues.

If confirmed, Puzder will likely take a pro-business, anti-labor, approach to steering the federal agency tasked with protecting American workers and their jobs, which clashes with Trump’s populist campaign message of fighting for blue-collar workers. Puzder has been a vocal defender of Trump’s economic policies, including lowering the corporate-tax rate, and has opposed Obamacare and certain business regulations, such as a higher minimum wage. Puzder has argued against raising the minimum wage and offering paid leave and health insurance to employees. Efforts to increase the minimum wage, he writes, will hurt everyone, especially low-skilled workers, because “businesses will have to figure out the best way to deal with the high labor costs.” Those changes, he says, will lead to price increases, more efficient labor management, and automation.

Since the end of World War II, the most crucial underpinning of freedom in the world has been the vigor of the advanced liberal democracies and the alliances that bound them together. Through the Cold War, the key multilateral anchors were NATO, the expanding European Union, and the U.S.-Japan security alliance. With the end of the Cold War and the expansion of NATO and the EU to virtually all of Central and Eastern Europe, liberal democracy seemed ascendant and secure as never before in history.

Under the shrewd and relentless assault of a resurgent Russian authoritarian state, all of this has come under strain with a speed and scope that few in the West have fully comprehended, and that puts the future of liberal democracy in the world squarely where Vladimir Putin wants it: in doubt and on the defensive.

Democrats who have struggled for years to sell the public on the Affordable Care Act are now confronting a far more urgent task: mobilizing a political coalition to save it.

Even as the party reels from last month’s election defeat, members of Congress, operatives, and liberal allies have turned to plotting a campaign against repealing the law that, they hope, will rival the Tea Party uprising of 2009 that nearly scuttled its passage in the first place. A group of progressive advocacy groups will announce on Friday a coordinated effort to protect the beneficiaries of the Affordable Care Act and stop Republicans from repealing the law without first identifying a plan to replace it.

They don’t have much time to fight back. Republicans on Capitol Hill plan to set repeal of Obamacare in motion as soon as the new Congress opens in January, and both the House and Senate could vote to wind down the law immediately after President-elect Donald Trump takes the oath of office on the 20th.

Trinidad has the highest rate of Islamic State recruitment in the Western hemisphere. How did this happen?

This summer, the so-called Islamic State published issue 15 of its online magazine Dabiq. In what has become a standard feature, it ran an interview with an ISIS foreign fighter. “When I was around twenty years old I would come to accept the religion of truth, Islam,” said Abu Sa’d at-Trinidadi, recalling how he had turned away from the Christian faith he was born into.

At-Trinidadi, as his nom de guerre suggests, is from the Caribbean island of Trinidad and Tobago (T&T), a country more readily associated with calypso and carnival than the “caliphate.” Asked if he had a message for “the Muslims of Trinidad,” he condemned his co-religionists at home for remaining in “a place where you have no honor and are forced to live in humiliation, subjugated by the disbelievers.” More chillingly, he urged Muslims in T&T to wage jihad against their fellow citizens: “Terrify the disbelievers in their own homes and make their streets run with their blood.”