I already knew that. I have researched the sovereign citizen movements legal arguments. Their laughably nonsense. They literally just make up pseudo-legal babble up, and imagine limitations and requirements for the courts and the law that don't actually exist.

I've even given you explicit examples from this very thread: the bizarre claims regarding the Organic Act of 1871. It simply didn't say what your ilk claimed it did.

And so it is with virtually every claim you make. Which is why when pressed to back these claims up, you can't.