punching the target is main!! criteria, it takes president over everything.

I dont how people can favour coming foward & looking menacing like you want a fight, over punches landed, even if it is apparently achieved by running. There is only one man getting hit in the face right there, if the rules dictate that you must win by hitting the opponent or rendering him unable to continue, then what does forcing a fight have to do with anything?

punching the target is main!! criteria, it takes precedent over everything.

I dont how people can favour coming foward & looking menacing like you want a fight, over punches landed, even if it is apparently achieved by running. There is only one man getting hit in the face right there, if the rules dictate that you must win by hitting the opponent or rendering him unable to continue, then what does forcing a fight have to do with anything?

punching the target is main!! criteria, it takes president over everything.

Yes but Valuev made him run away so therefore he should have won. Haye is a chicken ****, hit 3 times a round and run.

I favour the cleaner puncher over the aggressor too, but some rounds were hard to give to Haye because although he landed clean, he landed very little in some rounds. Valuev also blocked some punches aswell.

I'm just playing. I don't mind aggression and would have scored the rounds for Valuev if he actually hit haye's head the same amount but he simply did not.

soz man.

TBH i have not even seen the fight yet, its not so much that i was dedicating this thread to the Haye vs Valuev fight, its just after reading the responses i keep hearing people trot out the same **** that i was hearing after the Dirrell fight, that fight clearly should of gone to Dirrell and it just infuriates me that there are people out there dumb enough to score rounds for a guy based on ineffective aggression because he is coming foward.