If he confessed to his wife, why take out an injunction? Also surely he should have taken the DNA test before a) confessing to his wife b) taking out the injunction? After all, fathering a child out of wedlock's hardly a crime.

In this latest case, the injunction remains in force, despite the DNA development. The order prevents the media from reporting details, although anyone with access to the internet who types in the celebrity’s name will find plenty of speculation.

In this latest case, the injunction remains in force, despite the DNA development. The order prevents the media from reporting details, although anyone with access to the internet who types in the celebrity’s name will find plenty of speculation.

By saying that one name in the frame is that of a former Labour minister, it seems as though the Mail is trying to put a name in the frame themselves.
Must be a bit thick today though, because I still can't figure out who they are getting at
EDIT - just seen the above posts - seems there is already a suspect!