This is a simplifed HTML format, intended for screen readers and other limited-function browsers.

About this Title:

The Leveller pamphleteer Richard Overton could not stop himself from denouncing the tyrants who put him in jail for speaking his mind. His “arrow” was “shot from the prison of Newgate into the prerogative bowels of the arbitrary House of Lords and all other usurpers and tyrants whatsoever”.

Copyright information:

The text is in the public domain.

Fair use statement:

This material is put online to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. Unless otherwise stated in the Copyright Information section above, this material may be used freely for educational and academic purposes. It may not be used in any way for profit.

Table of Contents:

An Arrow against all Tyrants (1646).

An arrow against all tyrants and tyranny, shot from the prison of Newgate
into the prerogative bowels of the arbitrary House of Lords and all other usurpers
and tyrants whatsoever. Wherein the original, rise, extent, and end of magisterial
power, the natural and national rights, freedoms and properties of mankind
are discovered and undeniably maintained; the late oppressions and encroachments
of the Lords over the commons legally (by the fundamental laws and statutes
of this realm, as also by a memorable extract out of the records of the Tower
of London) condemned; the late Presbyterian ordinance (invented and contrived
by the diviners, and by the motion of Mr Bacon and Mr Tate read in the House
of Commons) examined, refuted, and exploded, as most inhumane, tyrannical and
barbarous

By Richard Overton

Prerogative archer to the arbitrary House of Lords, their prisoner in Newgate,
for the just and legal properties, rights and freedoms of the commons of England.
Sent by way of a letter from him, to Mr Henry Marten, a member of the House
of Commons

Imprimatur Rectat Justitia

Printed at the backside of the Cyclopian Mountains, by Martin Claw-Clergy,
printer to the reverend Assembly of Divines, and are to be sold at the sign
of the Subject's Liberty, right opposite to Persecuting Court. 1646

An arrow against all tyrants and tyranny, shot from the prison of Newgate
into the prerogative bowels of the arbitrary House of Lords, and all other
usurpers and tyrants whatsoever

Sir,

To every individual in nature is given an individual property by nature not
to be invaded or usurped by any. For every one, as he is himself, so he has
a self-propriety, else could he not be himself; and of this no second may presume
to deprive any of without manifest violation and affront to the very principles
of nature and of the rules of equity and justice between man and man. Mine
and thine cannot be, except this be. No man has power over my rights and liberties,
and I over no man's. I may be but an individual, enjoy my self and my self-propriety
and may right myself no more than my self, or presume any further; if I do,
I am an encroacher and an invader upon another man's right — to which
I have no right. For by natural birth all men are equally and alike born to
like propriety, liberty and freedom; and as we are delivered of God by the
hand of nature into this world, every one with a natural, innate freedom and
propriety — as it were writ in the table of every man's heart, never
to be obliterated — even so are we to live, everyone equally and alike
to enjoy his birthright and privilege; even all whereof God by nature has made
him free.

And this by nature everyone's desire aims at and requires; for no man naturally
would be befooled of his liberty by his neighbour's craft or enslaved by his
neighbour's might. For it is nature's instinct to preserve itself from all
things hurtful and obnoxious; and this in nature is granted of all to be most
reasonable, equal and just: not to be rooted out of the kind, even of equal
duration with the creature. And from this fountain or root all just human powers
take their original — not immediately from God (as kings usually plead
their prerogative) but mediately by the hand of nature, as from the represented
to the representers. For originally God has implanted them in the creature,
and from the creature those powers immediately proceed and no further. And
no more may be communicated than stands for the better being, weal, or safety
thereof. And this is man's prerogative and no further; so much and no more
may be given or received thereof: even so much as is conducent to a better
being, more safety and freedom, and no more. He that gives more, sins against
his own flesh; and he that takes more is thief and robber to his kind — every
man by nature being a king, priest and prophet in his own natural circuit and
compass, whereof no second may partake but by deputation, commission, and free
consent from him whose natural right and freedom it is.

And thus sir and no otherwise are you instated into your sovereign capacity
for the free people of this nation. For their better being, discipline, government,
propriety and safety have each of them communicated so much unto you (their
chosen ones) of their natural rights and powers, that you might thereby become
their absolute commissioners and lawful deputies. But no more: that by contraction
of those their several individual communications conferred upon and united
in you, you alone might become their own natural, proper, sovereign power,
therewith singly and only empowered for their several weals, safeties and freedoms,
and no otherwise. For as by nature no man may abuse, beat, torment, or afflict
himself, so by nature no man may give that power to another, seeing he may
not do it himself; for no more can be communicated from the general than is
included in the particulars whereof the general is compounded.

So that such, so deputed, are to the general no otherwise than as a school-master
to a particular — to this or that man's family. For as such an one's
mastership, ordering and regulating power is but by deputation — and
that ad bene placitum and may be removed at the parents' or headmaster's pleasure
upon neglect or abuse thereof, and be conferred upon another (no parents ever
giving such an absolute unlimited power to such over their children as to do
to them as they list, and not to be retracted, controlled, or restrained in
their exorbitances) — even so and no otherwise is it with you our deputies
in respect of the general. It is in vain for you to think you have power over
us to save us or destroy us at your pleasure, to do with us as you list, be
it for our weal or be it for our woe, and not be enjoined in mercy to the one
or questioned in justice for the other. For the edge of your own arguments
against the king in this kind may be turned upon yourselves. For if for the
safety of the people he might in equity be opposed by you in his tyrannies,
oppressions and cruelties, even so may you by the same rule of right reason
be opposed by the people in general in the like cases of destruction and ruin
by you upon them; for the safety of the people is the sovereign law, to which
all must become subject, and for the which all powers human are ordained by
them; for tyranny, oppression and cruelty whatsoever, and in whomsoever, is
in itself unnatural, illegal, yea absolutely anti-magisterial; for it is even
destructive to all human civil society, and therefore resistible.

Now sir, the commons of this nation, having empowered their body representative
(whereof you are one) with their own absolute sovereignty, thereby authoritatively
and legally to remove from amongst them all oppressions and tyrannies, oppressors
and tyrants — how great soever in name, place, or dignity — and
to protect, safeguard and defend them from all such unnatural monsters, vipers
and pests, bred of corruption or which are intruded amongst them; and as much
as in them lies to prevent all such for the future. And to that end you have
been assisted with our lives and fortunes most liberally and freely with most
victorious and happy success, whereby your arms are strengthened with our might,
that now you may make us all happy within the confines of this nation if you
please. And therefore sir, in reason, equity and justice we deserve no less
at your hands.

And (sir) let it not seem strange unto you that we are thus bold with you
for our own. For by nature we are the sons of Adam, and from him have legitimately
derived a natural propriety, right and freedom, which only we require. And
how in equity you can deny us we cannot see. It is but the just rights and
prerogative of mankind (whereunto the people of England are heirs apparent
as well as other nations) which we desire; and sure you will not deny it us,
that we may be men and live like men. If you do, it will be as little safe
for yourselves and posterity as for us and our posterity. For sir, look: what
bondage, thraldom, or tyranny soever you settle upon us, you certainly, or
your posterity will taste of the dregs. If by your present policy and (abused)
might, you chance to ward it from yourselves in particular, yet your posterity — do
what you can — will be liable to the hazard thereof.

And therefore sir we desire your help for your own sakes as well as for ourselves,
chiefly for the removal of two most insufferable evils daily encroaching and
increasing upon us, portending and threatening inevitable destruction and confusion
of yourselves, of us, and of all our posterities: namely the encroachments
and usurpations of the House of Lords over the commons' liberties and freedoms,
together with the barbarous, inhuman, blood-thirsty desires and endeavours
of the Presbyterian clergy.

For the first, namely the exorbitances of the Lords: they are to such an height
aspired, that contrary to all precedents, the free commoners of England are
imprisoned, fined and condemned by them (their incompetent, illegal, unequal,
improper judges) against the express letter of Magna Carta chapter 29 (so often
urged and used): that no free man of England 'shall be passed upon, tried,
or condemned, but by the lawful judgement of his equals, or by the law of the
land', which, as says Sir Edward Coke in his exposition of Magna Carta, p.
28, last line, is tper pares, by his peers, that is, by his equals'. And page
46, branches 1, 2 and 5, in these words:

1. That no man be taken or imprisoned, but per legem terrae, that is by the
common law, statute law, or custom of England. For these words, per legem terrae
being towards the end of this chapter, do refer to all the pretended matters
in this chapter; and this has the first place, because the liberty of a man's
person is more precious to him than all the rest that follow; and therefore
it is great reason that he should by law be relieved therein, if he be wronged,
as hereafter shall be showed.

2. No man shall be disseised, that is, put out of seisin, or dispossessed
of his freehold (that is, lands or livelihood) or of his liberties or free
customs (that is, of such franchises and freedoms, and free customs, as belong
to him by his free birthright) unless it be by the lawful judgement, that is
verdict of his equals (that is of men of his own condition) or by the law of
the land (that is, to speak it once for all) by the due course and processes
of law.

3. No man shall be in any sort destroyed unless it be by the verdict of his
equals or according to the law of the land.

And, chapter 29 of Magna Carta, it is said, 'secundum legem et consuetudinem
Angliae' (after the law and custom of England) 'non regis Angliae' (not of
the king of England) — 'lest it might be thought to bind the king only,
nec populi Angliae, not the people of England; 'but that the law might tend
to all, it is said, per legem terra, by the law of the land'.

'Against this ancient and fundamental law, and in the very face thereof, says
Sir Edward Coke, he found an act of the parliament made in the 11 Hen. VII
cap. 3: that as well Justices of the Peace, without any finding or presentment
by the verdict of twelve men, upon the bare information for the king before
them — should have full power and authority by their discretions to hear
and determine all offences and contempts committed or done by any person or
persons against the form, ordinance, and effect of any statute made and not
repealed. By colour of which act, shaking this fundamental law, it is not credible
(says he) what horrible oppressions and exactions — to the undoing of
infinite numbers of people — were committed by Sir Richard Empson, Knight,
and Edmund Dudley, being Justices of the Peace through England; and upon this
unjust and injurious act (as commonly in the like cases it falls out) a new
office was erected, and they made Masters of the King's Forfeitures.

But at the parliament held in 1 Hen. VIII (cap. 6), this Act of Henry VII
is recited, made void and repealed; and the reason thereof is yielded: for
that by force of the said act it was manifestly known that many sinister, crafty,
and forged informations had been pursued against divers of the king's subjects,
to their great damage and unspeakable vexation — a thing most frequent
and usual at this day and in these times — the ill success whereof, together
with the most fearful end of these great oppressors, should deter others from
committing the like and should admonish parliaments in the future, that instead
of this ordinary and precious trial per legem terra they bring not in an absolute
and partial trial by discretion.

And to this end the judgement upon Simon de Beresford, a commoner, in the
fourth year of Edward III's reign, is an excellent precedent for these times
(as is to be seen upon record in the Tower in the second roll of parliament
held the same year of the said king and delivered into the Chancery by Henry
de Edenston, Clerk of the Parliament) — for that the said Simon de Beresford
having counselled, aided and assisted Roger de Mortimer to the murder of the
father of the said king, the king commanded the earls and barons in the said
parliament assembled to give right and lawful judgement unto the said Simon
de Beresford. But the earls, barons and peers came before the lord the king
in the same parliament and said with one voice that the aforesaid Simon was
not their peer or equal, wherefore they were not bound to judge him as a peer
of the land. Yet notwithstanding all this, the earls, barons and peers (being
over-swayed by the king) did award and adjudge (as judges of parliament, by
the assent of the king in the said parliament) that the said Simon as a traitor
and enemy of the realm should be hanged and drawn; and execution accordingly
was done. But as by the said roll appears, it was by full parliament condemned
and adjudged as illegal, and as a precedent not to be drawn into example. The
words of the said roll are these, viz.

And it is assented and agreed by our lord the king and all the grandees in
full parliament: that albeit the said peers as judges in full parliament took
upon them in presence of our lord the king to make and give the said judgement
by the assent of the king upon some of them that were not their peers (to wit
commoners) by reason of the power of the liege lord, and destruction of him
which was so near of the blood royal and the king's father; that therefore
the said peers which now are, or the peers which shall be for the time to come,
be not bound or charged to give judgement upon others than upon their peers,
nor shall do it; but of that for ever be discharged and acquitted; and that
the aforesaid judgement now given be not drawn into example or consequent for
the time to come, by which the said peers may be charged hereafter to judge
others than their peers, being against the law of the land, if any such case
happen, which God defend.

Agrees with the Record. William Collet.

But notwithstanding all this our lords in parliament take upon them as judges
in parliament to pass judgement and sentence (even of themselves) upon the
commoners which are not their peers — and that to fining, imprisonment,
etc. And this doth not only content them, but they even send forth their armed
men, and beset, invade, assault their houses and persons in a warlike manner
and take what plunder they please, before so much as any of their pretended,
illegal warrants be showed — as was lately upon 11 August 1646 perpetrated
against me and mine, which was more than the king himself by his legal prerogative
ever could do. For neither by verbal commands or commissions under the Great
Seal of England could he ever give any lawful authority to any general, captain
or person whatsoever, without legal trial and conviction, forcibly to assault,
rob, spoil or imprison any of the free commoners of England. And in case any
free commoner by such his illegal commissions, orders or warrants, before they
be lawfully convicted, should be assaulted, spoiled, plundered, imprisoned,
etc., in such cases his agents and ministers ought to be proceeded against,
resisted, apprehended, indicted and condemned (notwithstanding such commissions)
as trespassers, thieves, burglars, felons, murderers, both by statute and common
law, as is enacted and resolved by Magna Carta, cap. 29; 15 Eliz. 3 stat. 1.
caps. 1, 2, 3; 42 Eliz. 5 cap. 1, 13; 28 Eliz. 1 Artic. sup. chartas, cap.
2; 4 Eliz. 3 cap. 4; 5 Eliz. 3 cap. 2; 24 Eliz. 3 cap. 1; 2 Rich II cap. 7;
5 Rich. II cap. 5; 1 Hen V cap. 6; 11 Hen II caps. 1-6; 24 Hen. VIII cap. 5;
21 Jacob. cap. 3.

And if the king himself have not this arbitrary power, much less may his peers
or companions, the lords, over the free commons of England. And therefore notwithstanding
such illegal censures and warrants either of king or of Lords (no legal conviction
being made) the persons invaded and assaulted by such open force of arms may
lawfully arm themselves, fortify their houses (which are their castles in the
judgement of the law) against them; yea, disarm, beat, wound, repress and kill
them in their just necessary defence of their own persons, houses, goods, wives
and families, and not be guilty of the least offence — as is expressly
resolved by the Statute of 21 Edw. de malefactoribus in parcis; by 24 Hen.
VIII cap. 5; 11 Hen. VI cap. 16; 14 Hen. VI cap. 24; 35 Hen. VI cap. 12; Edward
IV cap. 6.

And therefore (sir) as even by nature and by the law of the land I was bound,
I denied subjection to these lords and their arbitrary creatures thus by open
force invading and assaulting my house, person, etc. — no legal conviction
preceding, or warrant then shown. But and if they had brought and shown a thousand
such warrants, they had all been illegal, antimagisterial and void in this
case; for they have no legal power in that kind, no more than the king, but
such their actions are utterly condemned and expressly forbidden by the law.
Why therefore should you of the representative body sit still and suffer these
lords thus to devour both us and our laws?

Be awakened, arise and consider their oppressions and encroachments and stop
their lordships in their ambitious career. For they do not cease only here,
but they soar higher and higher and now they are become arrogators to themselves
of the natural sovereignty the represented have conveyed and issued to their
proper representers. They even challenge to themselves the title of the supremest
court of judicature in the land — as was claimed by the Lord Hunsden
when I was before them, which you may see more at large in a printed letter
published under my name, entitled A defiance against all arbitrary usurpations — which
challenge of his (I think I may be bold to assert) was a most illegal, anti-parliamentary,
audacious presumption, and might better be pleaded and challenged by the king
singly than by all those lords in a distinction from the Commons. But it is
more than may be granted to the king himself; for the parliament, and the whole
kingdom whom it represents, is truly and properly the highest supreme power
of all others — yea above the king himself.

And therefore much more above the Lords. For they can question, cancel, disannul
and utterly revoke the king's own royal charters, writs, commissions, patents,
etc., though ratified with the Great Seal — even against his personal
will, as is evident by their late abrogation of sundry patents, commissions,
writs, charters, loan, ship-money etc. Yea the body representative have power
to enlarge or retract the very prerogative of the king, as the Statute de prerog.
Reg. and the parliament roll of 1 Hen. IV, num. 18. doth evidence; and therefore
their power is larger and higher than the king's; and if above the king's,
much more above the Lords', who are subordinate to the king. And if the king's
writs, charters, etc. which entrench upon the weal of the people may be abrogated,
nulled and made void by the parliament — the representative body of the
land — and his very prerogatives bounded, restrained and limited by them,
much more may the orders, warrants, commitments etc. of the Lords, with their
usurped prerogatives over the Commons and people of England be restrained,
nulled and made void by them. And therefore these lords must needs be inferior
to them.

Further, the legislative power is not in the king himself but only in the
kingdom and body representative, who has power to make or to abrogate laws,
statutes etc. even without the king's consent. For by law he has not a negative
voice either in making or reversing, but by his own coronation oath he is sworn
to 'grant, fulfil, and defend all rightful laws, which the commons of the realm
shall choose, and to strengthen and maintain them after his power'; by which
clause of the oath is evident that the Commons (not the king or Lords) have
power to choose what laws themselves shall judge meetest, and thereto of necessity
the king must assent. And this is evident by most of our former kings and parliaments,
and especially by the reigns of the Edwards I to IV, Richard II and the Henrys
IV to VI. So that it cannot be denied but that the king is subordinate and
inferior to the whole kingdom and body representative. Therefore if the king,
much more must the lords veil their bonnets to the Commons and may not be esteemed
the Upper House, or supreme court of judicature of the land.

So that seeing the sovereign power is not originally in the king, or personally
terminated in him, then the king at most can be but chief officer or supreme
executioner of the laws, under whom all other legal executioners, their several
executions, functions and offices are subordinate; for indeed the representers
(in whom that power is inherent and from whence it takes its original) can
only make conveyance thereof to their representers, vicegerents or deputies,
and cannot possibly further extend it. For so they should go beyond themselves,
which is impossible, for ultra posse non est esse: there is no being beyond
the power of being. That which goes beyond the substance and shadow of a thing
cannot possibly be the thing itself either substantially or virtually; for
that which is beyond the representers is not representative, and so not the
kingdom's or people's, either so much as in shadow or substance.

Therefore the sovereign power, extending no further than from the represented
to the representers — all this kind of sovereignty challenged by any
(whether of king, Lords or others) is usurpation, illegitimate and illegal,
and none of the kingdom's or people's. Neither are the people thereto obliged.
Thus (sir) seeing the sovereign or legislative power is only from the represented
to the representers, and cannot possibly legally further extend, the power
of the king cannot be legislative but only executive, and he can communicate
no more than he has himself. And the sovereign power not being inherent in
him, it cannot be conveyed by or derived from him to any; for could he, he
would have carried it away with him when he left the parliament. So that his
mere prerogative creatures cannot have that which their lord and creator never
had, has, or can have: namely, the legislative power. For it is a standing
rule in nature, omne simile generas simile: every like begets its like.

And indeed they are as like him as if they were spit out of his mouth. For
their proper station will not content them, but they must make incursions and
inroads upon the people's rights and freedoms and extend their prerogative
patent beyond their master's compass. Indeed all other courts might as well
challenge that prerogative of sovereignty, yea better, than this court of lords.
But and if any court or courts in this kingdom should arrogate to themselves
that dignity to be the supreme court of judicatory of the land, it would be
judged no less than high treason, to wit, for an inferior subordinate power
to advance and exalt itself above the power of the parliament.

And (sir) the oppressions, usurpations, and miseries from this prerogative
head are not the sole cause of our grievance and complaint, but in especial,
the most unnatural, tyrannical, blood-thirsty desires and continual endeavours
of the clergy against the contrary-minded in matters of conscience — which
have been so veiled, gilded and covered over with such various, fair and specious
pretences that by the common discernings such wolfish, cannibal, inhuman intents
against their neighbours, kindred, friends and countrymen, as is now clearly
discovered was little suspected (and less deserved) at their hands. But now
I suppose they will scarce hereafter be so hard of belief. For now in plain
terms and with open face, the clergy here discover themselves in their kind,
and show plainly that inwardly they are no other but ravening wolves, even
as roaring lions wanting their prey, going up and down, seeking whom they may
devour.

For (sir) it seems these cruel minded men to their brethren, have, by the
powerful agitation of Mr Tate and Mr Bacon (two members of the House) procured
a most Romish inquisition ordinance to obtain an admission into the House,
there to be twice read, and to be referred to a committee, which is of such
a nature, if it should be but confirmed, enacted and established, as would
draw all the innocent blood of the saints from righteous Abel unto this present
upon this nation and fill the land with more martyrdoms, tyrannies, cruelties
and oppressions than ever was in the bloody days of Queen Mary, yea or ever
before, or since. For I may boldly say that the people of this nation never
heard of such a diabolical, murdering, devouring ordinance, order, edict or
law in their land as is that.

So that it may be truly said unto England: 'Woe to the inhabitants thereof,
for the devil is come down unto you (in the shape of the letter B.) having
great wrath, because he knows he has but a short time.' For never before was
the like heard of in England. The cruel, villainous, barbarous martyrdoms,
murders and butcheries of God's people under the papal and episcopal clergy
were not perpetrated or acted by any law so devilish, cruel and inhumane as
this. Therefore what may the free people of England expect at the hands of
their Presbyterian clergy, who thus discover themselves more fierce and cruel
than their fellows? Nothing but hanging, burning, branding, imprisoning, etc.
is like to be the reward of the most faithful friends to the kingdom and parliament
if the clergy may be the disposers — notwithstanding their constant magnanimity,
fidelity and good service both in the field and at home, for them and the state.

But sure this ordinance was never intended to pay the soldiers their arrears.
If it be, the Independents are like to have the best share, let them take that
for their comfort. But I believe there was more tithe-providence than state-thrift
in the matter; for if the Independents, Anabaptists, and Brownists were but
sincerely addicted to the due payment of tithes, it would be better to them
in this case than two-subsidy-men to acquit them of felony.

For were it not for the loss of their trade and spoiling their custom, an
Anabaptist, Brownist, Independent and presbyter were all one to them; then
might they without doubt have the mercy of the clergy; then would they not
have been entered into their Spanish Inquisition Calendar for absolute felons,
or need they have feared the popish soul-murdering, antiChristian Oath of Abjuration,
or branding in the left cheek with the letter B — the new Presbyterian
mark of the beast: for you see the devil is now again entered amongst us in
a new shape, not like an angel of light (as both he and his servants can transform
themselves when they please) but even in the shape of the letter B. From the
power of which Presbyterian Beelzebub, good Lord deliver us all and let all
the people say Amen. Then needed they not to have feared their prisons, their
fire and faggot, their gallows and halters, etc. (the strongest texts in all
the Presbyterian new model of clergy divinity for the maintenance and reverence
of their cloth, and confutation of errors). For he that doth but so much as
question that priest-fattening ordinance for tithes, oblations, obventions,
etc. doth flatly deny the fundamentals of presbyters, for it was the first
stone they laid in their building; and the second stone was the prohibition
of all to teach God's word but themselves — and so are ipso facto all
felons etc.

By this (sir) you may see what bloody-minded men those of the black presbytery
be: what little love, patience, meekness, longsuffering and forbearance they
have to their brethren. Neither do they as they would be done to or do to others
as is done to them. For they would not be so served themselves of the Independents,
neither have the Independents ever sought or desired any such things upon them,
but would bear with them in all brotherly love if they would be but contented
to live peaceably and neighbourly by them, and not thus to brand, hang, judge
and condemn all for felons that are not like themselves. Sure (sir) you cannot
take this murdering, bloody, disposition of theirs for the spirit of Christianity;
for Christian charity 'suffers long, is kind, envieth not, exalteth not itself,
seeketh not its own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil; beareth all
things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things'. But
these their desires and endeavours are directly contrary.

Therefore (sir) if you should suffer this bloody inroad of martyrdom, cruelties
and tyrannies upon the free commoners of England with whose weal you are betrusted;
if you should be so inhumane, undutiful, yea and unnatural unto us, our innocent
blood will be upon you, and all the blood of the righteous that shall be shed
by this ordinance, and you will be branded to future generations for England's
Bloody Parliament.

If you will not think upon us, think upon your posterities. For I cannot suppose
that any one of you would have your children hanged in case they should prove
Independents, Anabaptists, Brownists — I cannot judge you so unnatural
and inhumane to your own children. Therefore (sir) if for our own sakes we
shall not be protected, save us for your children's sakes (though you think
yourselves secure). For ye may be assured their and our interest is interwoven
in one; if we perish, they must not think to escape. And (sir) consider that
the cruelties, tyrannies and martyrdoms of the papal and episcopal clergy was
one of the greatest instigations to this most unnatural war; and think you,
if you settle a worse foundation of cruelty, that future generations will not
taste of the dregs of that bitter cup?

Therefore now step in or never, and discharge your duties to God and to us
and tell us no longer that 'such motions are not yet seasonable' and we must
still wait; for have we not waited on your pleasures many fair seasons and
precious occasions and opportunities these six years, even till the halters
are ready to be tied to the gallows, and now must we hold our peace and wait
till we be all imprisoned, hanged, burnt and confounded?

Blame us not (sir) if we complain against you — speak, write and plead
thus — with might and main for our lives, laws and liberties; for they
are our earthly summum bonum, wherewith you are chiefly betrusted, and whereof
we desire a faithful discharge at your hands in especial. Therefore be not
you the men that shall betray the blood of us and our posterities into the
hands of those bloody black executioners. For God is just and will avenge our
blood at your hands. And let heaven and earth bear witness against you, that
for this end, that we might be preserved and restored, we have discharged our
duties to you — both of love, fidelity and assistance and in what else
ye could demand or devise in all your several needs, necessities and extremities — not
thinking our lives, estates, nor anything too precious to sacrifice for you
and the kingdom's safety. And shall we now be thus unfaithfully, undutifully
and ungratefully rewarded? For shame. Let never such things be spoken, far
less recorded, to future generations.

Thus sir, I have so far emboldened myself with you, hoping you will let grievances
be uttered (that if God see it good they may be redressed), and give losers
leave to speak without offence as I am forced to at this time, not only in
the discharge of my duty to myself in particular but to yourselves and to our
whole country in general for the present and for our several posterities for
the future. And the Lord give you grace to take this timely advice from so
mean and unworthy an instrument.

One thing more (sir) I shall be bold to crave at your hands: that you would
be pleased to present my appeal, here enclosed, to your honourable House. Perchance
the manner of it may beget a disaffection in you or at least a suspicion of
disfavour from the House. But howsoever I beseech you that you would make presentation
thereof, and if any hazard and danger ensue let it fall upon me; for I have
cast up mine accounts. I know the most that it can cost me is but the dissolution
of this fading mortality, which once must be dissolved; but after — blessed
be God — comes righteous judgement.

Thus (sir) hoping my earnest and fervent desires after the universal freedoms
and properties of this nation in general, and especially of the most godly
and faithful in their consciences, persons and estates, will be a sufficient
excuse with you for this my tedious presumption upon your patience, I shall
commit the premises to your deliberate thoughts — and the issue thereof
unto God, expecting and praying for His blessing upon all your faithful and
honest endeavours in the prosecution thereof. And rest,

From the most contemptuous gaol of Newgate (the Lords' benediction)

25 September 1646

In bonds for the just rights and freedoms of the commons of England, theirs
and your faithful friend and servant, Richard Overton

To the high and mighty states, the knights, citizens and burgesses in parliament
assembled (England's legal sovereign power). The humble appeal and supplication
of Richard Overton, prisoner in the most contemptible gaol of Newgate.

Humbly shows,

That whereas your petitioner, under the pretence of a criminal fact being
in a warlike manner brought before the House of Lords to be tried, and by them
put to answer to interrogatories concerning himself — both which your
petitioner humbly conceives to be illegal, and contrary to the natural rights,
freedoms and properties of the free commoners of England (confirmed to them
by Magna Carta, the Petition of Right and the Act for the abolishment of the
Star Chamber) — he therefore was emboldened to refuse subjection to the
said House both in the one and the other, expressing his resolution before
them that he would not infringe the private rights and properties of himself
or of any one commoner in particular, or the common rights and properties of
this nation in general. For which your petitioner was by them adjudged contemptuous,
and by an order from the said House was therefore committed to the gaol of
Newgate, where, from the 11 of August 1646 to this present he has lain, and
there commanded to be kept till their pleasures shall be further signified
(as a copy of the said order hereunto annexed doth declare) which may be perpetual
if they please, and may have their wills. For your petitioner humbly conceives
as hereby he is made a prisoner to their wills, not to the law — except
their wills may be a law.

Wherefore your liege petitioner doth make his humble appeal unto this most
sovereign House (as to the highest court of judicatory in the land, wherein
all the appeals thereof are to centre and beyond which none can legally be
made) humbly craving (both in testimony of his acknowledgement of its legal
regality and of his due submission thereunto) that your honours therein assembled
would take his cause (and in his, the cause of all the free commoners of England,
whom you represent and for whom you sit) into your serious consideration and
legal determination, that he may either by the mercy of the law be repossessed
of his just liberty and freedoms — and thereby the whole commons of England
of theirs, thus unjustly (as he humbly conceives) usurped and invaded by the
House of Lords — with due reparations of all such damages to sustained,
or else that he may undergo what penalty shall in equity by the impartial severity
of the law be adjudged against him by this honourable House in case by them
he shall be legally found a transgressor herein.

And your petitioner (as in duty bound) shall ever pray, etc.

Die martis 11 Augusti, 1646

It is this day ordered by the Lords in parliament assembled, that Overton,
brought before a committee of this House for printing scandalous things against
this House, is hereby committed to the prison of Newgate for his high contempt
offered to this House and to the said committee by his contemptuous words and
gesture, and refusing to answer unto the Speaker. And that the said Overton
shall be kept in safe custody by the Keeper of Newgate or his deputy until
the pleasure of the House be further signified.

To the Gentleman Usher attending this House, or his deputy, to be delivered
to the Keeper of Newgate or his deputy John Brown Cleric. Parl. Examinat. per
Ra. Brisco Clericu. de Newgate

Postscript

Sir,

Your unseasonable absence from the House, chiefly while Mistress Lilburne's
petition should have been read (you having a report to make in her husband's
behalf) whereby the hearing thereof was deferred and retarded did possess my
mind with strong jealousies and fears of you that you either preferred your
own pleasure or private interest before the execution of justice and judgement,
or else withdrew yourself on set purpose (through the strong instigation of
the Lords) to evade the discharge of your trust to God and to your country.
But at your return, understanding that you honestly and faithfully did redeem
your absent time, I was dispossessed of those fears and jealousies. So that
for my over-hasty censorious esteem of you I humbly crave your excuse, hoping
you will rather impute it to the fervency of my faithful zeal to the common
good than to any malignant disposition or disaffection in me towards you. Yet
(sir) in this my suspicion I was not single, for it was even become a general
surmise.

Wherefore (sir) for the awarding your innocency for the future from the tincture
of such unjust and calumnious suspicions, be you diligent and faithful, instant
in season and out of season; omit no opportunity (though with never so much
hazard to your person, estate or family) to discharge the great trust in you
reposed, with the rest of your fellow members, for the redemption of your native
country from the arbitrary domination and usurpations, either of the House
of Lords or any other.

And since by the divine providence of God it has pleased that honourable assembly
whereof you are a member to select and sever you out from amongst themselves
to be of that committee which they have ordained to receive the commoners'
complaints against the House of Lords granted upon the foresaid most honourable
petition, be you therefore impartial and just, active and resolute, care neither
for favours nor smiles, and be no respecter of persons. Let not the greatest
peers in the land be more respected with you than so many old bellows-menders,
broom-men, cobblers, tinkers, or chimney-sweepers, who are all equally freeborn
with the hugest men and loftiest Anakims in the land. Do nothing for favour
of the one or fear of the other. And have a care of the temporary sagacity
of the new sect of opportunity politicians, whereof we have got at least two
or three too many. For delays and demurrers of justice are of more deceitful
and dangerous consequence than the flat and open denial of its execution; for
the one keeps in suspense, makes negligent and remiss, the other provokes to
speedy defence, makes active and resolute. Therefore be wise, quick, stout
and impartial: neither spare, favour, or connive at friend or foe, high or
low, rich or poor, lord or commoner.

And let even the saying of the Lord, with which I will close this present
discourse, close with your heart and be with you to the death. Leviticus 19:15.
'Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgement: thou shall not respect the person
of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty, but in righteousness shalt
thou judge thy neighbour.'