The CNH domain interacts with the small GTPase and regulating the actin cytoskeleton

gene transcription. The dynamic response to GR activation is consistent with feed forward logic Functional relationships between GR and its targets are often classified as “direct”, that involve GR recruitment to genomic binding sites associated with regulated genes, and “indirect”, whereby primary GR-regulated factors, rather than GR itself, are responsible for activation of the downstream targets. Thus, the activation of these secondary targets is often described as sequential or delayed. Such a model, however, cannot explain many instances of non-monotonous expression dynamics and non-linear response to varying hormone concentration of many GRE-driven genes. The large number of shared neighbors, overrepresentation of TFs and their high interconnectivity in GR regulatory networks are consistent with more intricate regulatory modalities such as FFL. Variations in kinetic parameters for participating TFs, target gene structure and activation/repression thresholds often lead to paradoxical responses to stimulation of the master TF with profound functional implications. PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19801058 C-FFLs serve as delayed response organizers that detect the duration/strength of a signal that activates the initiating TF. Interestingly, the dynamics of Fkbp5 induction by Dex, characterized by a substantial post-exposure delay followed by a robust expression, is reminiscent of the C-FFL in which the jointly regulated gene is activated by both the master and intermediate TFs. Although additional experiments are required to establish the precise mode of Fkbp5 regulation, this gene is a known direct GR target that recruits GR to K 858 biological activity Several GREs. Incoherent loops are responsible for negative and positive pulse generation, accelerated response and fold change sensing. Here, we observed that several GR target genes exhibit both positive and negative pulse-like dynamics consistent with the I-FFL. In keeping with the role of a potential master regulator, GR binds to the GREs in regulatory regions of many of these genes. Furthermore, using a system of ordinary differential equations which describe FFLs in the Chinenov et al. BMC Genomics 2014, 15:656 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/15/656 Page 16 of 19 “fold sensors” model, we showed that Klf2 expression is consistent with that of a gene under joint control of GR and a strong GR-activated repressor. Several GR-activated genes are either known transcription repressors or may downregulate gene expression by destabilizing RNA transcripts. Curiously, the expression dynamics of Klf9 fits closely with the computational prediction of an intermediate repressor in the GR-R-Klf2 I-FFL. GR is recruited to the Klf9 and Klf2 GREs as early as 40 min of Dex treatment. Both Klf9 and Klf2 regulatory regions also contain functional GAGGCGTGG KLF sites which can be occupied by various TFs of the KLF family including KLF9. Finally, in KLF9-KO macrophages, the induction profile of Klf2 loses the early peak followed by a decrease and acquires monotonous kinetics strongly suggesting a collapse of the I1FFL to simple GR-dependent activation. Interestingly, KLF binding sites are overrepresented in glucocorticoidregulated genes and are located near GREs in several bona fide GR target genes suggesting that these factors may coregulate a number of GR targets. KLF proteins in inflammation for GR and another member of KLF family, KLF15. Although KLF15 is not expressed in M, our studies strongly suggest extensive crosstalk between GR and other KLF family