Help

This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.

Hi, I am new to Wikipedia Review, as you can tell on my profile. After reading this site for a few hours, I was glad to see a section on notorious editors. It is my personal joke to tail and out anonymous editors who work for Indymedia and Riseup.net, since they fall under the category of Admin Tools Cabalists. When anonymous Wikipedia editors snipe my edits or references, I out them, and I out eco-terrorists, anarcoms, and I harass pinko P.I.s

I didn't see anything here on Jed Brandt, and Daniel Tasripin, a commie and an SDSer who were doing anonymous sniping on Wikipedia for Indymedia, so I included the link here:

Hi, I am new to Wikipedia Review, as you can tell on my profile... When anonymous Wikipedia editors snipe my edits or references, I out them, and I out eco-terrorists, anarcoms, and I harass pinko P.I.s

I didn't see anything here on Jed Brandt, and Daniel Tasripin, a commie and an SDSer who were doing anonymous sniping on Wikipedia for Indymedia, so I included the link here:

Wow, hey, gosh, did you guys and gals know by just looking at the number of edits of an editor you can tell that they are new to the site? Aren't we all lucky that a Staunch Defender of Free Speech is here to point that out, and stop all those liberals (pinko/commies/eco-terrorists) from practicing... errr... well... to be blunt about it... Free Speech in a manner that this individual has democratically decided isn't in keeping with their worldview.

Welcome, FLIPSIDE. Can I ask what anarcoms, P.I.s (other than Private Investigators) and SDSer's are - other than easier to spell than the full titles.

Yeah it's retro, in principle. But there is a thing about the net that lets nearly dead ideas propagate and even locate the maximum number of adherents, since the organization overhead is nearly without cost. SDS is running a pretty robust network.

If you are taking over a foreign country, such as Iraq, you kill off the more virile males and give free computers and money to the flamers, and place them in charge of the government, infrastructure and media.

If you are mildly a John Bircher, such as myself, you place a small bit of stock in the idea that transnational world socialists, or fabians, are still trying to merge America with Canada and Mexico, and institute Social Democracy in the U.S. Therefore minuscule, impertinent political groups are significant, because Ford, Tides, and Soros foundations, are pumping money into and giving blogs to little darling wikitotalitarians and infoshops.

These groups are attractive because they are politically active and active in consensus manufacture along The New School of Social Research's prescribed blueprint for social engineering. Thus the small, insignificant organizations add up to big power.