About Jason Thibeault

Hi! I'm a tech guy, skeptic, feminist, gamer and atheist, and love OSS and science of all stripes. I enjoy a good bit of whargarbl now and again, and will occasionally even seek it out. I am also apparently responsible for the death of common sense on the internet. My bad.

I have opinions. So do you. You want to share them with me. I would like to do likewise. Please don't expect a platform for proselytizing that will go unchecked and unchallenged, though. Contact me via the clicky thingies under my banner.

The commenting rules are simple: don't piss me off. This rule has worked for me for a decade; I have never found a need for any other rule, because any other rules leads to rules-lawyering. Just remember -- this is my property, not yours.

Did Chick-Fil-A bear false witness not once but twice?

“Lying for Jesus” is not a new tactic, but it’s certainly a hypocritical one, if you’ve decided that it is more important to follow the rules set out in the Bible than to trust your basic human empathy to guide you in dealing with other human beings. It’s fascinating to me that someone can square a dogmatic need to force everyone to adhere to one lesser set of guidelines in the Bible involving where you’re allowed to put your penis, while completely failing to follow one major rule set forth as a Commandment: thou shalt not bear false witness. Bearing false witness means, in no uncertain terms, lying — the rule, therefore, means “do not lie”.

First, the Jim Henson Company pulled its support for and Creature Shop toys from Chick-Fil-A, explicitly decrying the company’s “coming out” as explicitly anti-gay, and throwing their support behind GLAAD. I’m sure you’d heard this by now — there are quite a few Muppet-lovers around these parts, and news about a children’s media company (now owned by Disney, no less) supporting gay rights and decrying a Christian company for their anti-gay stance is definitely newsworthy.

We apologize for any inconvenience but as of 7/19/2012 Chick-fil-A has voluntarily recalled all of the Jim Henson’s Creature Shop Puppet Kids Meal toys due to a possible safety issue. Please be advised that there have not been any cases in which a child has actually been injured, however there have been some reports of children getting their fingers stuck in the holes of the puppets. We are offering a substitution of a complimentary kids icedream cone in its place until a replacement toy is available.

No actual events involving children being injured, just some “reports” of kids getting their fingers stuck. Color me skeptical.

Of especial note is that the memo circulated by Chick-Fil-A stores is dated to the day before the Jim Henson Company’s announcement. It smacks of post-hoc rationalization, and damage control, and desperation; and given the company’s current PR crisis as relates their anti-gay policies, it’s suspicious timing at the very least. It’s exceedingly likely that, since news of this “voluntary recall” is only hitting us now, it’s a bit of revisionist history after the Jim Henson Company’s left hook gave them a black eye.

Instead of owning up to the fact that The Jim Henson Company stopped doing business with them because they’re overrun with bigots, the chicken sandwich company appears to have made fake Facebook accounts to defend its honor on the social network. How do we know the accounts are fake? Just check out this back and forth on Chick-fil-A’s Facebook page between real, breathing people and “Abby Farle”, a Facebook account that was made 8 hours ago by a chicken PR flack with a stock image of a teenage girl as her profile picture

Click through for that exchange.

Chick-Fil-A denies that this was done by any representative of the company. This of course means “officially” — it could very well have been an overzealous supporter, or rogue employee, who created the account completely unbidden and solely for the purpose of defending the company and spreading the probably-false meme that Chick-Fil-A “fired first”. The existence of the second incident casts serious doubt — as though there wasn’t enough already — on the first.

It’s a shame there’s no solid evidence for either event presently. Either one would be damning on its own. And I do mean “damning” literally — because it would mean that these Christians bore false witness in order to protect their company from the fallout of having a COO who genuinely believes that homosexuality is immoral because it says so in his loose reading of his holy book.

Like this:

Related

About the author

Hi! I'm a tech guy, skeptic, feminist, gamer and atheist, and love OSS and science of all stripes. I enjoy a good bit of whargarbl now and again, and will occasionally even seek it out. I am also apparently responsible for the death of common sense on the internet. My bad.

I have opinions. So do you. You want to share them with me. I would like to do likewise. Please don't expect a platform for proselytizing that will go unchecked and unchallenged, though. Contact me via the clicky thingies under my banner.

The commenting rules are simple: don't piss me off. This rule has worked for me for a decade; I have never found a need for any other rule, because any other rules leads to rules-lawyering. Just remember -- this is my property, not yours.

Post navigation

5 thoughts on “Did Chick-Fil-A bear false witness not once but twice?”

But if it’s ok for Mittens to retrospectively retire when the facts don’t suit your current stance, surely it’s ok for Chick-Fil-A to retrospectively dump the Muppets first? I mean, you follow the moral example of your leaders right?

The commandment prohibits bearing false witness “against thy neighbor.” That’s not a prohibition against lying across the board, but a prohibition against a particular type of lying.

As for “lying for Jesus,” in some contexts it makes perfect sense given the basic premises of the liars — if you think you can help save someone’s soul by lying to him, it would be doing him a favor, and thus not only morally permissible, but possibly even an moral obligation. In this case, however, the liars seem to have been prompted less by a desire to save souls than by a desire to save Chick-Fil-A’s profits and public reputation.

Say, them there chicken parts wasn’t made out of ho-mo-sek- shu-al chickens, was they?

I have heard much on the apologetics concerning the bearing of false witness. Primarily that bearing false witness is not so much an edict against lying in and of itself, but rather against lying about someone else, and specifically against lying about someone else in order to paint them in a bad light, garner favor for yourself or aviod consequences.

Which, I feel compelled to add, is precisely what CFA did, so regardless of the apologetics they are damned.

Comments are closed.

The Orbit is a diverse collective of atheist and nonreligious bloggers committed to social justice, within and outside the secular community. For more information, please see our About Us page.

All content is copyright the authors except where otherwise noted. Contact the authors individually for further information.