When SCP-XXXX is in the inactive state, it is to remain on a moulded polyurethane hand (for details and specifications please contact Dr Pearce) and removal of the mould inlay may only be authorised by an Overseer and may only be removed under controlled research conditions with armed guard.

in *its* inactive state.

I get that it's a glove, but does it really need a display stand? Can't we just put it in a box or something? Will it get away or otherwise threaten personnel unless placed on a stand? Remember, it's an object to contain and study, not admire.

Having a specific person in charge of an SCP is a shunned practice by the community due to the 'what if something happens to him' reasoning as well as being seen as a self-insert (even if it isn't). Security Clearance Levels are an adequate substitute.

Requiring an O5 to approve testing is like having to ask the principal if you can go pee. A Site Director or Level 2-4 personnel would be sufficient.

with armed *guards*

This thing should be dangerous enough to warrant armed guards during testing, and if it is, it should be in the description.

Holy coordinating conjunctions, Batman! You should really break up this paragraph into several sentences.

Under no circumstances is any part of any living organism to be placed inside SCP-XXXX without prior written approval from O5-3 and on agreement that Dr Pearce or Dr Moran are present for observation.

Why O5-3 specifically?

As stated above, O5 authorizations are excessive and named doctors are a no-no nowadays.

Containment chamber is required to be painted on all surfaces in a heavy metal based paint

*The* containment chamber

Why? So it dampens its effects, but it only activates when worn. Restricting access to it would suffice. Besides, why would we want to dampen its effects when want to test them?

(lead based paints are readily available)

This. You don't need to put this. The Foundation is a super government organization with near infinite resources. They have lead paint, spray paint, duck paint, dog paint, monkey paint, and any other paint you can think of readily available.

and should be at least 3m x 3m x 2.5m.

Why so specific with the chamber size? Is it absolutely necessary? Would the SCP escape if it were off by 0.5 m?

Holy dangling modifier, Batman! If you need to put this, put it closer to what it modifies, in this case, the containment chamber.

The chamber is also to be prepared for acid flooding and drainage should re-entry become difficult.

We are now treading into the territory of the containment porn king! This is a Euclid class glove, nothing in the description suggests any of these are necessary. The Foundation would save a whole lot of trouble by just putting it in a box.

What would we need to acid bathe anyway. And re-entry of what?

Due to unstable nature of the object, researchers are required to remain at a minimum if 200m from the chamber and monitor until determined safe to enter via remote live video feed.

200 m is a ridiculously long distance i.e. the distance of two football fields.

Acids have proven effective at complete removal of subjects from within SCP-XXXX without damaging the artefact.

What? You're trying to remove the test subjects by melting them away? Is there any reason that we can't just carry them out or something?

*artifact*, also it is good practice to remain consistent with the use of you synonyms throughout the article.

Dead or non-living matter does not appear to activate SCP-XXXX. Once a subject has entered SCP-XXXX's interior, SCP-XXXX enters the active state and will remain active until separation from subject.

This should be in the description.

'Wears' would be a clearer term.

SCP-XXXX was discovered in 19██ when news of a primary school in ████████, ████████████ was detected as having unusual readings of an unknown energy spiking for brief moments.

See, most SCP description begin with 'SCP-XXXX is' with good reason. Some people *ahem* Scantron (as well as others) *ahem* don't care about anything else until they know what the SCP is and what it does.

however there is a basic 41th century decorative stitching pattern around the cuff.

So it's a futuristic SCP. Neat! Just kidding, I reckon this should be 21st century.

The interior of the glove do not appear to reflect any sort of light and internal surfaces cannot be observed but subjects have reported that they are tangible and have the texture of soft fur.

Subject verb agreement - should be, *does* not appear.

I suggest phrasing the sentence differently.

*Subjects are*. Using 'subject is' suggests there's ever only been one test subject.

So does it work on humans or what?

Interviewer: How did you do that?!

Doctors don't get amazed by this kind of stuff. They see it every day.

I get that it's a rework but the Special Containment Procedures do not coincide with the description. As is, it was difficult to understand with the sequencing and phrasing.

The description is also poorly written, especially the paragraph about the effects. Like I said in the line by line, I can't tell whether it works on humans because you describe it as if it was only tested on animals yet bring in something about 6 year old humans and kindergartner metal capacities.

As for the idea itself, it's a glove that gives animals human speech and telekinesis and/or matter creation. At least, that's what I think it does. Also there's no hook. You have to put something there to make it interesting, like a back-story, and it has to be well executed.