Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

[quote="Anonymous"]anyone know a jean magdalena? it could be an alias.[/quote] miznor park apartments? wonder if they have a hot tub?

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:48 am

by Anonymous

pretty hi end, bussiness must be good.

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:30 pm

by Anonymous

Late night pool rendevous...with that cigar...

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 4:44 am

by Anonymous

at least one more late night trist on video

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 9:30 am

by Anonymous

No more drinking, cigar smoking and menage de trois while on the clock for you anymore..

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:39 pm

by Anonymous

The survellience system had a hard drive? That should be quite interesting.

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 11:32 pm

by Anonymous

scott jackson?

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 12:31 am

by Anonymous

has anyone seen ribeiros toxicology report?

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 8:54 pm

by Anonymous

how bout Alfonso's toxicology report? Why did you leave the scene?Alfonso didn't have a scratch on him.. why isn't McKenna arrested or wait she's going to be arrested...actually all three of them should be arrested

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 11:14 pm

by Anonymous

I saw the unofficial blood draw results from the hospital. Ribiero had a BAL (unofficial) of .25 which makes him drunk as hell and 3 times tge legal limit. Alfonso on the other hand had a BAL much lower, .15. Technically it would be a DUI but he wasn't driving now was he? Besides most law enforcement officers have so much experience driving that a .15 is hardly noticeable. I know how alcohol affects people and I have a lot of experience seeing what levels cause what problems because I keep a pocket intoxilizer in my green and white so I can make sure I'm safe after I go out drinking. I'll also have my friends blow and most of them are 100% fine at anything under .2. Its that number where problems happen as ribiero demonstrated.
He was only minding his own business, smoking a cigar and enjoying the quiet atmosphere of the pool house in the evening when a drunken maniac attacked him.

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:12 am

by Anonymous

[quote="Anonymous"]how bout Alfonso's toxicology report? Why did you leave the scene?Alfonso didn't have a scratch on him.. why isn't McKenna arrested or wait she's going to be arrested...actually all three of them should be arrested[/quote] They are waiting for Ribeiros statement before arresting her. If he gives same story as Mckenna she will also be charged with witness tampering.

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 10:34 am

by Anonymous

FACT: Deputy Alfonso was not attacked.
If the BALs are accurate, then what we have here is an off-duty, publicly intoxicated at almost twice the legal limit, carrying a concealed firearm without ID (illegally). Off-duty shoots a man who is probably too drunk to be a real threat, but the intoxicated off-duty felt (while he was drunk and his judgement was severely impaired) that he was. According to the PC affidavit, the video doesn't show Ribiero making any move whatsoever to hit Alfonso with the bottle, and no verbal threat of attack, or physical attack has been alleged. I'm having trouble believing the BALs are accurate however, because the person who posted them seems to think that it's okay to drunk-carry and drunk-drive as a police officer, which means they are a mentally retarded menace. If they are accurate though, Ribiero's attorney, and the press, are going to have a field day with this one.

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 11:37 am

by Anonymous

If he left the scene why is he heard on the 911 call? If he left the scene could it be that he went to get his phone? The only people who should be arrested in all of this are the two scumbag trespassers!

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:07 pm

by Anonymous

he might have been heard on the 911 call but they also asked if the suspect was in custody and they said no send a helicopter up....where did he go,?...answer the question, stop beating around the bush.

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:16 pm

by Anonymous

[quote="Anonymous"]FACT: Deputy Alfonso was not attacked.
If the BALs are accurate, then what we have here is an off-duty, publicly intoxicated at almost twice the legal limit, carrying a concealed firearm without ID (illegally). Off-duty shoots a man who is probably too drunk to be a real threat, but the intoxicated off-duty felt (while he was drunk and his judgement was severely impaired) that he was. According to the PC affidavit, the video doesn't show Ribiero making any move whatsoever to hit Alfonso with the bottle, and no verbal threat of attack, or physical attack has been alleged. I'm having trouble believing the BALs are accurate however, because the person who posted them seems to think that it's okay to drunk-carry and drunk-drive as a police officer, which means they are a mentally retarded menace. If they are accurate though, Ribiero's attorney, and the press, are going to have a field day with this one.[/quote]

I have been a deputy for over a decade and I fail to see why his BAL being a .15 would have any effect on him at all. He wasnt driving. If in fact it did affect him like you say, then Ribiero should thank his lucky stars the deputy was too intoxicated to hit center mass. You should be thanking the deputy, not critisizing him. The press wont touch this case. Ribero is a punk that thought he could scare Alfonso and he was wrong. The press don't care about a punk like him and don't care such a trivial fact as him having a few drinks in his OFF DUTY time.

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:27 pm

by Anonymous

[quote="Anonymous"]he might have been heard on the 911 call but they also asked if the suspect was in custody and they said no send a helicopter up....where did he go,?...answer the question, stop beating around the bush.[/quote]

You are obtuse and strangely angry. I am assuming, because I do not know that he went anywhere, that if he did leave it was to get his phone. Why is this such a huge issue for you? I dont care where he went or what he did while there. He didnt commit ANY crime and your alleging that he did is farcical.

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:36 pm

by Anonymous

[quote="Anonymous"][quote="Anonymous"]FACT: Deputy Alfonso was not attacked.
If the BALs are accurate, then what we have here is an off-duty, publicly intoxicated at almost twice the legal limit, carrying a concealed firearm without ID (illegally). Off-duty shoots a man who is probably too drunk to be a real threat, but the intoxicated off-duty felt (while he was drunk and his judgement was severely impaired) that he was. According to the PC affidavit, the video doesn't show Ribiero making any move whatsoever to hit Alfonso with the bottle, and no verbal threat of attack, or physical attack has been alleged. I'm having trouble believing the BALs are accurate however, because the person who posted them seems to think that it's okay to drunk-carry and drunk-drive as a police officer, which means they are a mentally retarded menace. If they are accurate though, Ribiero's attorney, and the press, are going to have a field day with this one.[/quote]

I have been a deputy for over a decade and I fail to see why his BAL being a .15 would have any effect on him at all. He wasnt driving. If in fact it did affect him like you say, then Ribiero should thank his lucky stars the deputy was too intoxicated to hit center mass. You should be thanking the deputy, not critisizing him. The press wont touch this case. Ribero is a punk that thought he could scare Alfonso and he was wrong. The press don't care about a punk like him and don't care such a trivial fact as him having a few drinks in his OFF DUTY time.[/quote]

I have seen the video and whoever says that Riberio made no aggressive move towards the Off Duty D/S is full of it. He and his skank enter the area from the left side of the frame. He moves directly towards Alfonso and in a very direct manner. Alfonso is smoking a cigar and minding his own business in a place where he legally had the right to be. Not so much for Tony and his ho. As Tony's back is then turned to the camera, you can see movement right before he falls backwards after being shot. As for the BAL, I have seen no proof and if Alfonso was drunk, he was on property where he had his weapon. I can carry my gun anywhere on my property, drunk or not. There is no crime there. You also keep harping on the fact that he didnt carry his ID at the time of the shooting. I am unaware of ANY FSS where this is "illegal" as you proclaim in almost every post. The fact that he had told them an HOUR EARLIER that he was a LEO should have been sufficient to dissuade them from returning to the area but Tony and his ho arent that smart. Shit happens.

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

790.151 Using firearm while under the influence of alcoholic beverages, chemical substances, or controlled substances; penalties.—

(1) As used in ss. 790.151-790.157, to “use a firearm” means to discharge a firearm or to have a firearm readily accessible for immediate discharge.

(2) For the purposes of this section, “readily accessible for immediate discharge” means loaded and in a person’s hand.

(3) It is unlawful and punishable as provided in subsection (4) for any person who is under the influence of alcoholic beverages, any chemical substance set forth in s. 877.111, or any substance controlled under chapter 893, when affected to the extent that his or her normal faculties are impaired, to use a firearm in this state.

(4) Any person who violates subsection (3) commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

(5) This section does not apply to persons exercising lawful self-defense or defense of one’s property.

Paragraph 5 blows your theory all to hell.

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:45 pm

by Anonymous

790.052 Carrying concealed firearms; off-duty law enforcement officers.—
(1) All persons holding active certifications from the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission as law enforcement officers or correctional officers as defined in s. 943.10(1), (2), (6), (7), (8), or (9) shall have the right to carry, on or about their persons, concealed firearms, during off-duty hours, at the discretion of their superior officers, and may perform those law enforcement functions that they normally perform during duty hours, utilizing their weapons in a manner which is reasonably expected of on-duty officers in similar situations. However, nothing in this subsection shall be construed to limit the right of a law enforcement officer, correctional officer, or correctional probation officer to carry a concealed firearm off duty as a private citizen under the exemption provided in s. 790.06 that allows a law enforcement officer, correctional officer, or correctional probation officer as defined in s. 943.10(1), (2), (3), (6), (7), (8), or (9) to carry a concealed firearm without a concealed weapon or firearm license. The appointing or employing agency or department of an officer carrying a concealed firearm as a private citizen under s. 790.06 shall not be liable for the use of the firearm in such capacity. Nothing herein limits the authority of the appointing or employing agency or department from establishing policies limiting law enforcement officers or correctional officers from carrying concealed firearms during off-duty hours in their capacity as appointees or employees of the agency or department.
(2) The superior officer of any police department or sheriff’s office or the Florida Highway Patrol, if he or she elects to direct the officers under his or her supervision to carry concealed firearms while off duty, shall file a statement with the governing body of such department of his or her instructions and requirements relating to the carrying of said firearms.
History.—ss. 1, 2, 3, ch. 72-84; s. 235, ch. 77-104; s. 23, ch. 79-8; s. 3, ch. 88-183; s. 4, ch. 95-318; s. 1204, ch. 97-102.

Now show me where it says they must carry ID!

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 1:09 pm

by Anonymous

arrest affidavit also has drugs box checked. what drugs were in his system? was mckenna tested? what drugs were in her system?

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 5:40 pm

by Anonymous

To "paragraph 5":
No, it does not. Please note the phrase "exercising lawful self-defense". There is no mention whatsoever of a bottle in the video description portion of the PC affidavit, let alone an "attack" of any kind. If Tony was holding a bottle, and deputy Alfonso was afraid Tony might hit him with it, why didn't Alfonso just stand up, back up so he was beyond Tony's reach, draw his firearm. and instruct Tony to drop the bottle? Could it be, that Alfonso's assessment of the situation and how he handled it was tragically influenced by his alleged state of drunkeness?

To whoever keeps calling the common area of the rental community Alfonso's home, or his property:
You are full of shit, plain and simple. It is an open public space, that happens to be private property, but it isn't deputy Alfonso's private property, much less his home. And no, egomaniac, citizens should not accept any and all unsupported claims of agency affiliation without question.

To the statute quoter:
Please refer to federal law - LEOSA
18 USC 926B requires that the individual must carry photographic identification issued by the governmental agency for which the individual is employed that identifies the employee as a police officer or law enforcement officer of the agency.

I guess it's too much to ask of PBSO deputies to stop acting like armed frat boys who just found out their girlfriend is banging their best friend, and start behaving like trained, professional, responsible peace officers.

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 5:50 pm

by Anonymous

Almost forgot, LEOSA 18 USC 926B(c):
5. [A qualified law enforcement officer] is not under the influence of alcohol or any other intoxicating or hallucinatory drug or substance

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 5:57 pm

by Anonymous

Shooting someone unlawfully and unjustified while intoxicated should absolutely be arrested...I hope tonys lawyer knows what the "f" he's

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 6:08 pm

by Anonymous

[quote="Anonymous"][quote="Anonymous"][quote="Anonymous"]FACT: Deputy Alfonso was not attacked.
If the BALs are accurate, then what we have here is an off-duty, publicly intoxicated at almost twice the legal limit, carrying a concealed firearm without ID (illegally). Off-duty shoots a man who is probably too drunk to be a real threat, but the intoxicated off-duty felt (while he was drunk and his judgement was severely impaired) that he was. According to the PC affidavit, the video doesn't show Ribiero making any move whatsoever to hit Alfonso with the bottle, and no verbal threat of attack, or physical attack has been alleged. I'm having trouble believing the BALs are accurate however, because the person who posted them seems to think that it's okay to drunk-carry and drunk-drive as a police officer, which means they are a mentally retarded menace. If they are accurate though, Ribiero's attorney, and the press, are going to have a field day with this one.[/quote]

I have been a deputy for over a decade and I fail to see why his BAL being a .15 would have any effect on him at all. He wasnt driving. If in fact it did affect him like you say, then Ribiero should thank his lucky stars the deputy was too intoxicated to hit center mass. You should be thanking the deputy, not critisizing him. The press wont touch this case. Ribero is a punk that thought he could scare Alfonso and he was wrong. The press don't care about a punk like him and don't care such a trivial fact as him having a few drinks in his OFF DUTY time.[/quote]

I have seen the video and whoever says that Riberio made no aggressive move towards the Off Duty D/S is full of it. He and his skank enter the area from the left side of the frame. He moves directly towards Alfonso and in a very direct manner. Alfonso is smoking a cigar and minding his own business in a place where he legally had the right to be. Not so much for Tony and his ho. As Tony's back is then turned to the camera, you can see movement right before he falls backwards after being shot. As for the BAL, I have seen no proof and if Alfonso was drunk, he was on property where he had his weapon. I can carry my gun anywhere on my property, drunk or not. There is no crime there. You also keep harping on the fact that he didnt carry his ID at the time of the shooting. I am unaware of ANY FSS where this is "illegal" as you proclaim in almost every post. The fact that he had told them an HOUR EARLIER that he was a LEO should have been sufficient to dissuade them from returning to the area but Tony and his ho arent that smart. Shit happens.[/quote]

^ Hey "Shit happens..." are you 12 years old? Are all girls consider "ho" and "skank" in your pathetic world? I pity your mother. She must be so proud... NOT! Looser.

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 7:17 pm

by Anonymous

Just a short month ago this is what the claims were.[font='Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif]This narrative is a blatant lie. Deputy Alex Alphonso was already sitting at the pool when the couple walked in to the pool area. He Started harassing them right off. They Asked to see his ID since he claimed he was a Cop and he couldn’t present it because he didn’t have his wallet with him. The Female doesn’t drink and Tony Doesn’t drink “Hob Nob” wine. Who came up with this lame tale ?Did they Test Alex Alphonso for Alcohol? That may have been difficult since he Fled the scene after shooting Tony! This is a Psychopathic cop on the edge. Anyone caught covering for him will go down as well![/font]They lied about the first meeting. They lied about the wine bottle. They lied about who the agressor was. They lied about AA leaving the scene. Everything up to this point has been proven to be a lie. Notice the threats. Now are we really suppose to believe the allegations of a drunk deputy? Haven't you people embarassed yourselves enough?

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 8:02 pm

by Anonymous

^Hey Doucherocket, no, not all girls. Just this one in this instance. Nothing has changed other than your defense of "this one" amuses me.

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 8:08 pm

by Anonymous

We are NOT Federal Agents. Good Lord! You clowns are so obtuse. Those US Codes are funny because this is a STATE case. Sue him in Federal Court. Should be fun!

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 9:37 pm

by Anonymous

[quote="Anonymous"]Just a short month ago this is what the claims were.[font='Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif]This narrative is a blatant lie. Deputy Alex Alphonso was already sitting at the pool when the couple walked in to the pool area. He Started harassing them right off. They Asked to see his ID since he claimed he was a Cop and he couldn’t present it because he didn’t have his wallet with him. The Female doesn’t drink and Tony Doesn’t drink “Hob Nob” wine. Who came up with this lame tale ?Did they Test Alex Alphonso for Alcohol? That may have been difficult since he Fled the scene after shooting Tony! This is a Psychopathic cop on the edge. Anyone caught covering for him will go down as well![/font]They lied about the first meeting. They lied about the wine bottle. They lied about who the agressor was. They lied about AA leaving the scene. Everything up to this point has been proven to be a lie. Notice the threats. Now are we really suppose to believe the allegations of a drunk deputy? Haven't you people embarassed yourselves enough?[/quote] After the load of bull that Mckenna handed her and Ribeiros supporters, and the way the supporters made total fools of themselves repeating the tale by issuing ultimatums and threats, I find it unbelievable that they would have the stupidity to keep throwing out the accusations. Can they really be that dumb? They didn't know about the video, and can't be faulted for blind loyalty, but it has become obvious that at the very least there are holes in Mckennas version if not outright lies. But yet, we still hear the pea brains here defending them instead of proceding with caution and waiting for the evidence to be released.

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 10:33 pm

by Anonymous

I told you alex Alfonso was drunk from day one. He's reckless, he's a liability, he uses excessive force and he beats women...oh yeah, he likes to leave the scene of a crime. Oh yeah, and he doesn't like to carry his ID when he's got a gun in his pocket. Idiot ..he needs to be fired

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 11:07 pm

by Anonymous

Lake Clarke Shores

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 12:20 am

by Anonymous

Just like Michael Custer's shooting of Seth Adams, Bradshaw will cover for his deputies no matter what the evidence.

[quote="Anonymous"]I told you alex Alfonso was drunk from day one. He's reckless, he's a liability, he uses excessive force and he beats women...oh yeah, he likes to leave the scene of a crime. Oh yeah, and he doesn't like to carry his ID when he's got a gun in his pocket. Idiot ..he needs to be fired[/quote]

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 2:58 am

by Anonymous

Hey Mr. Federal Agent, the Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act is a federal law that establishes carry requirements for all LEOs and retired LEOs, not just "federal agents".

Back to work Deputy Alfonso!

Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 6:55 am

by Anonymous

they have to keep moving him around because he keeps fuking up in a district he's working in