Part 1, on injuries that exist on our civilization's path and are worth avoiding, was in the October 2016 issue.

Part 2, on a civilization design that does not create these extreme injuries, was in the November 2016 issue.

Part 3, on forces exist that transition to and maintain a sustainable civilization, was in the December 2016 issue.

Part 4, A social contract exists that creates the forces in Part 3, was in the January 2017 issue.

Part 5, Constituencies can implement social contracts, was in the February 2017 issue.

Unwinding the Human Predicament is "work in progress," and the reader should visit the SKIL website for the latest updates.

In the previous section I described how two hermits could come to the conclusion that adding a mutual constraint would provide each with some benefits. The constraint was obvious and immediate. And the benefit was obvious and immediate.
So the conversation between the two hermits was simple.

However, the conversations for the case of additions to the social contract that produce civilization sustainability are not simple. The constrains outlined in part 4 and the imagined future benefits are not simple.

The one-on-one conversations between two people, one an advocate for the new constraints and benefits, and the other blind to any future injury on the present path are not simple. However they may be not too complex for these conversations to succeed.

Similar complexity did not prevented abolition, suffrage, prohibition, and civil right from being added to our social contract. Their adoption started with simple one on one conversations. It took time for a constituency to grow large enough; first to create social pressure for change, and eventually to create enough institutional coercion to implement them.

The "Change the Course" project at SKIL plans to understand and help implement these one on one conversations. By initiating and dissecting many trial conversations among many pairs of individuals we hope to determine the form and content of making the blind listener into an informed advocate.

This 10 minute video. invites you to participate in the "Change the Course" -- a project to identify the form and content of these conversations.

Jack Alpert is director of Stanford Knowledge Integration Lab, a Lab which he started in 1978 at Stanford University. In 1992 the Lab left Stanford and became a non profit research foundation. The research focused on how people gather and process information to understand dynamic systems. Over the years the Lab has transitioned its focus to the relationship between human cognition and civilization viability. The current work is on discovering and implementing behavior that “changes our course” and creates a sustainable civilization. The author can be contacted at alpert@skil.org.