I believe science is the method being used to examine everything possible in Creation.
To term evolution as what science believes is the timeline of Creation here on Earth, sure why not.
To believe evolution is a built in mechanism of Creation, sure why not.

Evolution can only disprove someone's uneducated narrow definition of Creation. Some nutter can proclaim the earth is 6000 years old for example.

To believe evolution can somehow disprove Creation, that is impossible.
Creation can step in above evolution at any point and claim evolution is only looking at the mechanics of Creation.

None of your questions you listed are relevant to belief in evolution.

I don't see any evidence that suggests/proves evolution. Only some promoting it. Real evidence I obtain through reading, listening, and using my own
judgement piecing together what I sense a right or true. I see much suggesting creation. Let me let you know; I don't read the bible, never have..I
don't go to church and haven't since being a little boy(And I never will). And I don't pray. With all that said let me add I am not religious in
any form nor will I ever be. But I am starting to believe in god in some non religion sense. And it's because of what my research leads me to
believe. I have a lot of time on my hands to be paying attention. I will not dive into you question either. You are asking for us to dis-prove what
nobody has proven in the first place. I believe this is a wasted thread not in the sense of discussion but within the information presented inside the
discussion. I personally have FOUR HUNDRED AND FOUR news paper articles that indicate we were between 9 and 25 feet tall with double sets of teeth. I
want you to explain that with the evolution theory. Here is over 110 I composed for you in a video I am proud of. Thanks.
www.youtube.com...

Hey I believe in evolution and aside from number 2 I don’t know what those terms mean which makes me think that to be honest answering number one I
would have to say no but up until now I thought I had a firm grasp on it.

Oh well I guess I have some reading to do I don’t like being willfully ignorant.

Hey I believe in evolution and aside from number 2 I don’t know what those terms mean which makes me think that to be honest answering number one I
would have to say no but up until now I thought I had a firm grasp on it.

Oh well I guess I have some reading to do I don’t like being willfully ignorant.

Originally posted by TinfoilTP
To believe evolution is a built in mechanism of Creation, sure why not.
...
None of your questions you listed are relevant to belief in evolution.

My questions are extremely relevant to how evolutionary relationships are determined in science; i.e. are humans and apes descended from a common
ancestor?

No one has answered my actual questions. I really do believe that most people who do not believe in evolution have no clue how it is even supposed to
work.

I'm just wondering. Feel free to prove me wrong...

It doesn't matter how it works, Creation is always above evolution. If part of the Creation process is shown to be, through evolution, that the path
to man is through apes so be it, it will only be a part of the Creation process.

Originally posted by TinfoilTP
It doesn't matter how it works, Creation is always above evolution. If part of the Creation process is shown to be, through evolution, that the path
to man is through apes so be it, it will only be a part of the Creation process.

What is this "creation" you speak of?
Where does it come from?
What does it do?
How does it do it?
What makes you think so?

Originally posted by TinfoilTP
It doesn't matter how it works, Creation is always above evolution. If part of the Creation process is shown to be, through evolution, that the path
to man is through apes so be it, it will only be a part of the Creation process.

What is this "creation" you speak of?
Where does it come from?
What does it do?
How does it do it?
What makes you think so?

Evolution is one of mans attempts to understand Creation. Go ask the evolutionists, anything they find will lead to further understanding of the
Creation.

Originally posted by TinfoilTP
It doesn't matter how it works, Creation is always above evolution. If part of the Creation process is shown to be, through evolution, that the path
to man is through apes so be it, it will only be a part of the Creation process.

What is this "creation" you speak of?
Where does it come from?
What does it do?
How does it do it?
What makes you think so?

Evolution is one of mans attempts to understand Creation. Go ask the evolutionists, anything they find will lead to further understanding of the
Creation.

Wtf?
You brought up this "creation" thing, it's only fair you explain it.
Cause, you know, we heathens tend to like thinking and questioning stuff...

Originally posted by TinfoilTP
It doesn't matter how it works, Creation is always above evolution. If part of the Creation process is shown to be, through evolution, that the path
to man is through apes so be it, it will only be a part of the Creation process.

What is this "creation" you speak of?
Where does it come from?
What does it do?
How does it do it?
What makes you think so?

Evolution is one of mans attempts to understand Creation. Go ask the evolutionists, anything they find will lead to further understanding of the
Creation.

Wtf?
You brought up this "creation" thing, it's only fair you explain it.
Cause, you know, we heathens tend to like thinking and questioning stuff...

All of man's theories can go all the way back to what we understand as the big bang, then Creation can rear it's ugly head and take credit for all.
Don't like that then we can theorize multiple universes with multiple big bangs but the initial vibration in nothing can be be claimed by
Creationists. All probabilities came into being after the point of creation so anything that is, was made possible by Creation.
The argument is unwinnable, Creation always wins. Exercises in futility are mans domain though.

Originally posted by TinfoilTP
It doesn't matter how it works, Creation is always above evolution. If part of the Creation process is shown to be, through evolution, that the path
to man is through apes so be it, it will only be a part of the Creation process.

What is this "creation" you speak of?
Where does it come from?
What does it do?
How does it do it?
What makes you think so?

Evolution is one of mans attempts to understand Creation. Go ask the evolutionists, anything they find will lead to further understanding of the
Creation.

Wtf?
You brought up this "creation" thing, it's only fair you explain it.
Cause, you know, we heathens tend to like thinking and questioning stuff...

All of man's theories can go all the way back to what we understand as the big bang, then Creation can rear it's ugly head and take credit for all.
Don't like that then we can theorize multiple universes with multiple big bangs but the initial vibration in nothing can be be claimed by
Creationists. All probabilities came into being after the point of creation so anything that is, was made possible by Creation.
The argument is unwinnable, Creation always wins. Exercises in futility are mans domain though.

If that is your definition of "creation" then "creation" is dishonest.
"We don't know" always win.
If I don't know, belief is irrelevant.

I am talking about evolutionary biology, here, which begins after the spark of life has already come into existence on this planet.

Let's stick to the topic at hand. Evolution, mostly by natural selection, and relationships between species.

Ahh that spark of life from the creationist standpoint includes the ability to adapt to the environment and co dependencies within the environment.
Why would a creator not include unattended self adaptability?
This also includes things like viruses. If the environment becomes overpopulated, lack of available food and unsanitary conditions would lead to
culling. The simplest path for nature would be to just let the overpopulation starve off, yet there are complex diseases that perform this task. The
life infected that survives adapts to resist these diseases to ensure survivability from the current outbreak, but the virus has the ability to rapidy
adapt so as to reset itself so that it will still be viable in the environment the next time culling conditions arise.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.