OSNews: http://www.osnews.com/story/17718/Work_Started_on_Haiku_Office_Suite
Exploring the Future of Computingen-usCopyright 2001-2015, David Adamsadam+nospam@osnews.comTue, 03 Mar 2015 23:23:37 GMThttp://www.osnews.com/images/osnews.gifOSNews.comhttp://www.osnews.com
Awesomehttp://www.osnews.com/thread?231727
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231727Lots of Haiku news and exposure lately. Makes me excited.Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:35:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (shykid)CommentsRE: Awesomehttp://www.osnews.com/thread?231732
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231732There sure is. Personally I don't think Haiku gets the recognition it deserves. The Google presentation they did a few months ago certainitly helped with that. Lets hope they continue with more good news.Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:51:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (TaterSalad)CommentsRE: Awesomehttp://www.osnews.com/thread?231735
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231735I agree the more news the better it gets more people looking for the Haiku release.Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:55:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (JPisini)CommentsSweethttp://www.osnews.com/thread?231744
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231744Very cool. Although, I was a little confused by the name OOffice. Maybe a different name would be better. Also, the new icons look spiffy, Stippi. Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:13:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (brewin)CommentsRE[2]: Awesomehttp://www.osnews.com/thread?231751
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231751I agree with you. I kept hearing news about Haiku now and then about small developments, and have been following their progress. Lately, they really have been progressing nicely. It really isn't easy trying to clone an OS when you have no source code whatsoever.

Keep up the good work!Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:49:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (bulio)CommentsHmmhttp://www.osnews.com/thread?231753
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231753I don't understand the goal of this project. The guy wants to make an office suite? From sratch? That's the most crazy idea I've heard in a while

I know that porting OpenOffice is crazy too but at least you're not reinventing the wheel :| Even with those "open format", making an office suite from scratch is not staightforward.Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:55:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (rx182)CommentsBit Soup...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231754
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231754Ever hear/read the story about Stone Soup?

Someone with a pot of water starts heating it, and puts a stone in it, and people ask them, "Hey, what are you cooking?" they explain it's missing a few things, and ask if they have anything to contribute. Little bit by little bit, the soup grows into something more tasty than hot water with a rock in it, and everyone enjoys.

Seems this may be the Bit Soup Office

Hey, whatever works: it's a massive undertaking, and sooner or later it's hoped Haiku is a desktop OS worthy of attracting more users than merely ubergeeks that develop stuff for fun, and for that, the majority of computer users need good office software. Porting Open Office (ala Sun) would be (at best) a major headache because of how different the threading and system interactions are between BeOS/Haiku and any other platform it currently exists on: just ask the people that worked on the FireFox port how much trouble that caused!

By far, a native application is preferable on any platform, so keep on going!Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:57:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (JonathanBThompson)CommentsCouldn't he take OpenOffice and modify it ...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231755
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231755Couldn't he take OpenOffice and modify it to fit in with BeOS? It seems like that would be a lot less work. Maybe he could talk to the people at NeoOffice about how they take OpenOffice and convert it to run as a Mac OS X Java app that looks like a Mac program.

I can understand if he just wants to start from scratch. But this could take a couple of years to have a decent office suite or even just a decent Word Processor (as compared to a text editor).Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:58:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Sabon)CommentsRE: Couldn't he take OpenOffice and modify it ...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231760
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231760Could he? Maybe, but it certainly wouldn't be less work. I have not personally worked on Open Office code but I have laid eyes on some of it and until you do it is impossible to fathom just how fricken LARGE it is. Its huge. 400MB of source code consisting of more than 30,000 individual source files and 9,000,000 line of code.

I can tell you with some certainty that a port of OO to BeOS would be MANY orders of magnitude more complex than creating a basic but functional Word Processor/Spreadsheet from scratch. That probably wont stop some people from trying, but the shear magnitude of the task will likely scare off the vast majority of developers.

Anyway, BeOS is known and loved for being small, fast, svelt, etc., generally the opposite of OO... I dont think OO is a good fit at all.Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:28:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (galvanash)CommentsRE[2]: Couldn't he take OpenOffice and modify it ...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231762
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231762

Could he? Maybe, but it certainly wouldn't be less work. I have not personally worked on Open Office code but I have laid eyes on some of it and until you do it is impossible to fathom just how fricken LARGE it is. Its huge. 400MB of source code consisting of more than 30,000 individual source files and 9,000,000 line of code.

A better bet would be something like abiword which had a port that was abandoned IIRC. That way a lot of the grunt work would be done.

Personally I think Haiku developers should be focussing on stuff people are going to need directly after R1 is released : up to date & stable firefox port, decent mail client, instant messenger, samba, itunes-like mp3 player. Especially the firefox port would need to be top-notch : promote that along with Google docs & spreadsheet.Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:41:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Tyr.)CommentsNot OpenOffice, but maybe GNOME Officehttp://www.osnews.com/thread?231763
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231763Abiword and Gnumeric are quite a capable duo and much more simpler to hack than OpenOffice.org.Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:43:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Sodki)CommentsRE[3]: Couldn't he take OpenOffice and modify it ...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231779
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231779A better bet would be something like abiword which had a port that was abandoned IIRC. That way a lot of the grunt work would be done.

Zeta team was working on Abiword 2.4.x, though it never was completed. I believe it is around 85% done. ( I was able to compile it on BeOS & Zeta, but needs more work ).

Abiword is around 130MB for the source vs OpenOffice which is 400MB. In my opinion, Abiword is the best choice for word processor & should be easier to get working on Haiku ( or BeOS ).

That gets things started with very good word processor & spreadsheet programs.

Doing an office suite from scratch is lots of work and will require lots of time to do. I think it better to focus instead on Abiword & Sum-It which can get done faster & will work well too.Edited 2007-04-18 01:34Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:27:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (tonestone57)CommentsRE[4]: Couldn't he take OpenOffice and modify it ...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231784
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231784I'll also add that; Abiword & Sum-It, for Haiku, could be completed in about 6 months time. They definately could be ready in that timeframe.

OpenOffice is a bad choice, because:
1. Source code is 400MB ( lots & lots of code to work with )
2. Uses lots of Xwindows stuff that has to be rewritten.
3. And the java stuff too.

OpenOffice is almost as tough as creating an OS with the amount of code it has.

Porting it over to Mac OS was easier because, if I'm not mistaken, Mac OS X uses BSD type ( compatible ) kernel & Xwindow system ( ie: OS X is similar / close to BSD; So easier to get OO on it ).

Haiku has posix compliance, but the Xwindow ( and Java? - maybe have Java for Haiku by then? ) code would have to be rewritten. Not easy to do.

The easiest stuff to port to Haiku ( or BeOS ) is applications / programs that are posix compliant and either use console or SDL ( ie: Xwindow stuff needs lots more work to do - code has to be rewritten ).Edited 2007-04-18 01:49Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:43:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (tonestone57)CommentsWhy nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?231787
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231787This does not have to compete with OpenOffice or AbiWord. Instead, it can be in the realm of minimalistic yet useful application.

If somebody is willing to spend the time putting together a decent native word processor program for Haiku with basic functionality that would allow users to write simple letters and/or documents without the bloat, I am all for it!Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:24:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (sogabe)CommentsRE: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?231789
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231789Anybody love the idea of a Native BeOS office suite?

Hey, I can dream. We can dream. Wasn't that long ago that Haiku was just a dream! And look how far it's come!Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:33:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (ThawkTH)CommentsRE[4]: Couldn't he take OpenOffice and modify it ...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231793
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231793i don't think it really matters what you think HIS time is best spent on. He's donating his time to what he thinks will be best. Abiword + Sum-it isn't that.

Need you guys be so critical of what he's doing? He wants to do what he thinks would be a good word processor for Haiku. This isn't zeta, this isn't BeOS anymore. This is Haiku. Let Haiku have it's own.

If you think firefox is more important, you work on firefox, you work on samba or whatever else you think is more important. Leave this guy alone.Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:52:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (aesiamun)CommentsRE[3]: Couldn't he take OpenOffice and modify it ...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231794
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231794Yeah that's what Haiku needs for R1...an iTunes like MP3 player...Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:54:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (aesiamun)CommentsNaysayinghttp://www.osnews.com/thread?231797
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231797What is with all of the naysaying. The beauty of Free Software is that if someone has an itch to scratch (and this seems to be a pretty important one) they can do so and we should all give them our support.

This may not be the fastest way to get a complete office suite for Haiku but it is certainly the best long run option. In terms of ports if that road is explored I wonder how KOffice would be in difficulty in porting in comparison with say OO.org or Abiword. I would guess that there would be a lot of library porting, but once that was done there would be a huge library of apps available for very little extra overhead. However, I could see concerns, such as voiced in the Syllable community, that ports discourage applications from being developled using the native libraries which is the whole point for a unified desktop.Wed, 18 Apr 2007 03:19:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Seth Quarrier)CommentsRE[5]: Couldn't he take OpenOffice and modify it ...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231800
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231800Theres X11 for BeOS and OSX... but no, OSX doesnt use X by default... at least not from waht I know...Wed, 18 Apr 2007 03:56:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (helf)CommentsHaiku is uniquehttp://www.osnews.com/thread?231813
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231813It's unique and should have a unique office program matched to what it can do. Remember messaging and servers.. any good office program has to use those cool abilities to tie windows together and pull programs into other programs that BeOS had. In my opinion that was why commercial people didn't want to touch it. BeOS was a very "one program" type system. Properly written programs were more a pool of small programs than one single "exe". The problem any commercial app would have under an OS like Be would be other users ripping off the modules to use in their own apps.. BeOS supported "mashups" long before it was ever thought of by polite programmers.

I think Koffice or Abiword would be a good start. If haiku could hack DBus messaging into the built in messaging they could open up the whole world of QT apps. Abiword is "good enough" for normal use also. Both have Openoffice.org swx and odf documents supported in the mainline now.... THAT is the biggest selling point. If you have ODF you can talk to the other players in the open source space!!!

You can gain a lot from firefox and it's plug-ins also. And Firefox 3 will add some really cool stuff in terms of caching and working offline.Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:59:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (mabhatter)CommentsMight be off subject here, but...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231824
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231824will Gobe productive suite work with Haiku?Wed, 18 Apr 2007 07:17:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Arthur)CommentsHmm... the pragmatic advicehttp://www.osnews.com/thread?231825
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231825Building a massive software system like an office suite (aka Office clone) for a new proprietary and unpopular operating system is not the smartest thing in the world to do.

Building a small, simple application to fill a certain role, okay. But a big system, oof...

Given the rise of complex web-based applications such as email-over-web and collaborative-document-editing-over-web, taking on such a large challenge as cloning Abiword or OpenOffice would be crazy-talk at best. Partly because of the redundant work needed, partly because the roles can largely be filled by a web browser, and partly because the OS itself is not a sound investment unless your time is cheap.Wed, 18 Apr 2007 07:20:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Luminair)CommentsRE: Hmm... the pragmatic advicehttp://www.osnews.com/thread?231829
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231829

Building a massive software system like an office suite (aka Office clone) for a new proprietary and unpopular operating system is not the smartest thing in the world to do.

I see Gobe still exists, currently offering Gobe Productive 3.04 for Windows. You have to wonder how their focus shift has gone...

Certainly if anyone could put up a reasonably fully-featured office suite for Haiku in a shortish time, it would have to be them. Commercial, of course; you couldn't expect them to open-source it now. And you could understand if they take a once-bitten-twice-shy attitude to Haiku. But still, potential customers are potential customers...

(Any Gobe people still lurking in these parts?)Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:25:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (nmalth)CommentsRE: Hmm... the pragmatic advicehttp://www.osnews.com/thread?231845
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231845Something somebody chooses to do in their own free time does not have to bring value to anyone but themselves. A surprisingly large number of people are happy to tell someone else what they should do, without doing the work themselves.Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:28:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Vanders)CommentsRE: Couldn't he take OpenOffice and modify it ...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231848
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231848Haiku needs native programs more than ports. Ports are only useful until a viable native solution comes. There is already AbiWord 1.0 and Sumit running on BeOS. True they are old versions, but they do the basic job until a native app comes. Now if only a browser can be completed too. Firefox is great, but Haiku should also have a good native browser.Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:37:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (vasper)CommentsRE[4]: Couldn't he take OpenOffice and modify it ...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231854
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231854

Yeah that's what Haiku needs for R1...an iTunes like MP3 player...

No need to be sarcastic. Haiku is a desktop oriented OS, this means providing apps people use frequently at home. Everyone has mp3's on their pc, everyone needs a decent app to play and manage them. This is suppposed to be a media-os right ?

Look at what people use and try to fill that need. To me this means browser > mail > mp3. And I don't think that people after years of using iTunes and its clones on linux will be satisfied with a 90's era player.

Of course this is all just IMHO.

Edit : to clarify I'm talking about third party apps, not suggesting that any of this should be done by the Haiku-os people. They've enough on their hands.Edited 2007-04-18 09:58 UTCWed, 18 Apr 2007 09:56:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Tyr.)CommentsRE[5]: Couldn't he take OpenOffice and modify it ...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231861
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231861

i don't think it really matters what you think HIS time is best spent on. He's donating his time to what he thinks will be best. Abiword + Sum-it isn't that.

Need you guys be so critical of what he's doing? He wants to do what he thinks would be a good word processor for Haiku. This isn't zeta, this isn't BeOS anymore. This is Haiku. Let Haiku have it's own.

I thought the whole idea of a comments section was to comment, analyse, speculate on and critique the news ;-)Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:14:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Tyr.)CommentsRE[2]: Might be off subject here, but...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231874
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231874While I really want to see Gobe Productive working under Haiku. It currently doesn't and there's a ticket in the bug tracker. Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:45:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (darkwyrm)CommentsMissing the pointhttp://www.osnews.com/thread?231880
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231880That is of the design of the underlying OS of which Haiku inherits from BeOS.
Having a native office suite allows for the use of system wide plugin architecture that allows for so much more than on other OS's. For instance: Once you have a plugin to handle JPEG's for a specific application, then all other applications can utilise the plugin's JPEG capability.

This is just one of the things that separate BeOS/Haiku from other OS's.Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:09:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (blitze)CommentsRE[2]: Couldn't he take OpenOffice and modify it ...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231888
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231888I saw many projects for a Web browser.
Actually (since Qt developers are doing so and their API seems like the BeOS/Haiku one) WebCore seems a good thing in order to make a native Browser.

As for AbiWord and Sum-it, I think that they can be used to create both a Word Processor and a Spreadsheet for Haiku.

Before working on a WP and a Spreadsheet it would be better to create some new widgets used for these applications.Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:38:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (plfiorini)CommentsRE[2]: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?231915
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231915Ever here of GoBe Productive?Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:55:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (CPUGuy)CommentsLook at the screenshots...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231946
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231946Anyone else notice something? The screenshots are from Zeta, not BeOS R5 and definitely not from Haiku. I really don't see the point. An app being written for Zeta isn't even going to work in Haiku, that I know of.Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:39:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Luposian)CommentsRE[2]: Might be off subject here, but...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231947
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231947Gobe appears to be dead, I have tried several times in the past to contact them. For some reason my boxed copy of GobeProductive 2 came up one day with This trial has expired, I uninstalled it then reinstalled it from disk. Nope, heard that there is a way to hack it to work again but personally not worth it for me. Gobe's support forum closed, and no one answeres the phone, all their reviews and press pages etc. refer to 2004ist time. Someone had said they had purchased the rights to the code and then later said the deal fell through, as far as I know that was the last heard from Gobe, other then at one time their was a comment about Zeta not paying correctly for liscences, then that was it.Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:42:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Datatec)CommentsRE: Look at the screenshots...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231951
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231951An app being written for Zeta isn't even going to work in Haiku, that I know of.

This is of course wrong. Apps written for Zeta can run just fine in R5 and Haiku as long as they don't use any zeta-specific APIs. If you have the source, it should be a minor effort to recompile it for R5.

On the other hand, there is some mention of certain GUI widgets that exist in Zeta that the developer needs in Haiku - so it may very well turn out that a project like this ends up contributing some new "experimental" GUI widgets to Haiku.Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:57:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (umccullough)CommentsRE[3]: Might be off subject here, but...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231954
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231954If your CD of GoBe is 2.0, this will happen. If so, go to BeBits and download the 2.01 update - that will fix it.Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:01:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (parrotjoe)CommentsRE[2]: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?231956
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231956Don't get me wrong. I'd love to see Haiku "native" software & drivers. I'm sure everybody wants this.

A Haiku office suite, web browser, drivers, etc., would be great. But, the reality is, how long before Haiku Office is as good as Abiword or is even released for use? Maybe 2 or more years?

What about web browser that is close to functionality as Firefox? When will that be done? Or native wifi drivers? Or ...., etc.

Using ports is the best way to get the OS fully functional in the shortest time. So, when R1 comes out we can have up to date ports & a fully working OS which will attract more end users. Example: Zeta used ndis wrapper (window wifi drivers), Cups (Unix Printer Support) & BeSane (Unix Scanner Support). If they decided to go for native instead then how long before most users got support for their printer, scanner & wifi cards???? Answer, many years. And, would anyone have even bothered with Zeta without these ports?

I'd rather have an OS with most things working right now ( through ports ) than one where I'm waiting, waiting and waiting for the native solution to appear some years down the road.

Ports are the fastest way to get things going and afterwards they can be replaced with native solutions once available.

As for the Haiku native office suite. It'll be great to have when it's done, but in the meantime users will have to use either older Abiword 1.0 "port" or purchase Gobe Office ( made for BeOS ) - luckily we have these 2 options available to us. So, I suggested Abiword 2.4 because it is about 85% ported to BeOS & could be finished before R1 gets released so users have a more modern word processor to use with Haiku until a native one is done. Same thing goes for web browser. Use Firefox until a comparable native replacement is made., etc., etc.

Ports are the better solution until as good as or better native solutions come along!Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:14:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (tonestone57)CommentsRE[4]: Might be off subject here, but...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231969
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231969Gobe should either recompile and maintain or donate the source code of the BeOS Verison of the Productive Suite to the Haiku organization.

Freeing the source is is probably the best if not the only way to salvage the code and put it to good use and maintain it. The project could be managed under Haiku or a separate non-profit organization.

This would be a huge boost to Haiku.

ciao
ycWed, 18 Apr 2007 15:44:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (_yc_)CommentsRE[2]: Look at the screenshots...http://www.osnews.com/thread?231974
http://www.osnews.com/thread?231974Given the severely illegal status of Zeta, as dictated by Access, I wouldn't want a single pixel from Zeta to get anywhere NEAR Haiku! Tainted code taints EVERYTHING! It's like GPL! Even worse!

Gives me icy cold shivers, just thinking about it...

Besides, I run Haiku to use Haiku. Not to look like Windows or AmigaOS, or MacOS. Even when using BeOS, I never touched (nor appreciated) the "Decorators" available. I accessed it, just once, to see what it was about and never did again.

People who try and make their OS look like another OS (oh, say... Windows XP users trying to make their system look like MacOS X, for example) are only proving the fact that they wish it WAS that OS they're trying to look like.

If you're gonna look like Zeta... why not just USE Zeta? If you're gonna look like Windows, just USE Windows.

BeOS is BeOS. Zeta is Zeta (which, as we all now know, is an illegal version of BeOS R5.1). AmigaOS is AmigaOS. MacOS X is MacOS X. Use the OS you're trying to look like, instead of being a wanna-be.

I am a BeOS/Haiku/MacOS X (my three favorite OS's) purist. To take *ANY* GUI "widgets" from Zeta is going to look extremely hokey in Haiku, because it won't "fit", looks-wise.

Besides, who wants to have ANY association, in looks or function... to an OS whose very *existance* is deemed illegal by the new BeOS IP owners? Are we all crazy or something?

I never appreciated the whole Dano/BONE leak thing. Then we have a bunch of apps over at BeBits that won't run in BeOS R5, because it needs "BONE" or it needs "Dano". Making apps that only run on (or require) illegally leaked code is just plain disgusting to me.

That's like saying: You can't write software using Microsoft's .NET Framework with the target platform intended to be Mono. It's the same API! BeOS had it first (before Zeta) - so what is the big deal? Haiku uses (mostly) the same API as BeOS/Zeta anyway - so you're really nitpicking here.

The code belongs to this developer - if he wishes to use Zeta to develop it, and then compile it for Haiku later, that's entirely his business. Why people get so upset about this, I don't understand.

Edit: BTW, in case you didn't notice - quite a few of the Haiku developers USED to work on Zeta at one point or another...Edited 2007-04-18 17:09Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:07:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (umccullough)CommentsRE[3]: Look at the screenshots...http://www.osnews.com/thread?232015
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232015To take *ANY* GUI "widgets" from Zeta is going to look extremely hokey in Haiku, because it won't "fit", looks-wise.

You're right, and while we're at it, let's get rid of all the scrollbar widgets in Haiku. I'm certain I've seen them in other OS's and therefore they look horrible and foreign in Haiku.

Besides, who wants to have ANY association, in looks or function... to an OS whose very *existance* is deemed illegal by the new BeOS IP owners? Are we all crazy or something?

Apparently everyone who wants to use Haiku or BeOS, because they're all very similar OS's.Edited 2007-04-18 18:00Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:57:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (smitty)CommentsRE[3]: Look at the screenshots...http://www.osnews.com/thread?232018
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232018I guess I better stop using OSX. It has Scroll Bars like Windows and Icons just like Windows. I better quit using iTunes as there is a Windows version that looks just like it! And yes, I am being sarcastic.Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:17:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (dtravis7)CommentsRE[5]: Might be off subject here, but...http://www.osnews.com/thread?232022
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232022Gobe should either recompile and maintain or donate the source code of the BeOS Verison of the Productive Suite to the Haiku organization.

Why should they do any of that? All of that, including "donating" source code (it's not as easy as you think -- it requires engineers and lawyers to go through the code line by line with a fine-tooth comb), would cost them money they'll never recover. You want the code, offer to buy it from them. Better start selling brownies or something.

Freeing the source is is probably the best if not the only way to salvage the code and put it to good use and maintain it. The project could be managed under Haiku or a separate non-profit organization.

Why does Gobe care if their BeOS-related code is salvaged, put to use, etc.? BeOS is dead. They still sell Productive for Windows online. How in the world do you propose they protect their Windows-related code -- from which they derive revenue -- while giving away their BeOS-related code?

This would be a huge boost to Haiku.

What's in it for Gobe? Do they even give a rat's [bleep] about Haiku?Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:24:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (lucky13)CommentsRE: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?232029
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232029Instead, it can be in the realm of minimalistic yet useful application.

I hate the Mac-PC ads, but your reply reminds me of the one when Mac talks about how many apps come with Macs so they're useful out of the box and then PC stupidly brags about coming with a calculator. Woohoo...

Haiku will not have widespread adoption until and unless users can do everything as easily, as well, as completely, etc., as they can using their current OSes. In fact, I'll go further. Haiku won't expand much further than the hobbyists who are already enthralled with its "promise" right now unless it can exceed -- not merely match, but beat the bleeping socks off -- application offerings (qualitatively and quantitatively) of other OSes. No killer app, no future. Why would people ditch what they already have in 2007 and take a step back to 1987 or even 1997?

If you want a simple, bloat-free wordprocessor, try porting ted. It's X11-based, but its source tarball is about 3MB. Certainly would be easier than totally reinventing the wheel -- but that's what Haiku is all about, eh.

http://www.nllgg.nl/Ted/Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:41:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (lucky13)CommentsRE[2]: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?232040
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232040Widespread adoption is a bad goal to have early on and very unrealistic; you end up trying to be all things to all people and get nowhere.

I hope the Haiku focus is to evolve to be the choice OS for a small and particular niche of professionals -- those developing media content, especially video content. It could be the OS of choice for indy film developers with just a few good apps.

Success breeds more success; find a niche and succeed, and other good things will follow.

Hats off to anyone willing to put time and energy into creating an app for Haiku; even if it doesn't finish, if there is a good design then objects from the source can be used elsewhere. It will be a good learning experience at the worst.Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:48:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Richard-LA)CommentsRE[2]: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?232058
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232058Who mentioned widespread adoption/world domination in this thread regarding Haiku?

As you know, the BeOS 'philosophy' was all about ease of use. Talk to me about the 'ease' of configuring certain parts of any GNU/Linux distribution you care to mention. Talk to me about stability, reliability issues, re-installing Windows, failed Linux installs etc.

To my knowledge, there is not an x86 OS out there that fits your description of OS 'nirvana' unless, of course, you happen to be absorbed by fixing computers that don't work properly or have the neccessary skills to do so without thinking about it.

What you fail to mention is that one persons nirvana is anothers sh*tpit. In other word, my computing needs are different from yours. Linux...tried it, Windows, dislike it with avengeance. OSX...will never own a Mac.

Now, if 'hobbyists' like myself, wish to root for an OS like Haiku, complete with it's miniscule userbase, for a lack of satisfaction with the rest of the OS offerings out there, then Ok, I just don't see your problem. If you don't have an, interest, why even respond to the thread with nothing but sour grapes?Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:33:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (El-Al)CommentsRE[4]: Look at the screenshots...http://www.osnews.com/thread?232073
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232073What people are not realizing is that Zeta was borne of an illegally acquired codebase of BeOS. And, by all current accounts, should have been ceased immediately from it's inception.

To me, any "changes" (graphical wigets or whatever) that were made are borne of Zeta's illegality and, therefore, any semblance of those changes appearing in Haiku or an app for Haiku, should be considered impermissible (not permitted).Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:28:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Luposian)CommentsRE[4]: Couldn't he take OpenOffice and modify it ...http://www.osnews.com/thread?232074
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232074Look again, Haiku's MediaPlayer looks like it will end up features found in SoundPlay.

MediaPlayer already supports most sound formats and a number of video formats, I expect streaming to end up added to the mix soon.

As good as ITunes? No. A 90's music player? No-Way.Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:32:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Earl Colby pottinger)CommentsRE[5]: Look at the screenshots...http://www.osnews.com/thread?232076
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232076Did you even bother read the blog content around this app? - we're talking about missing GUI widgets that most OSes already have - toolbar, splitpane, listview - i mean jeez!

These are widgets that many other BeOS programs have proprietary implementations for already - all this guy is trying to say is: Haiku needs some of these, Zeta already has some standard ones, and he has been borrowing code from other projects in order to get some of them.

Don't you think it would be important for Haiku to provide much-needed GUI widgets that many existing BeOS products implement? Don't you think maybe a standard Haiku version of those widgets would help keep a consistent GUI look and feel instead of allowing every developer to write his own?

You really do not seem to get the gist of what is being said here - instead you see/hear "Zeta" and decide its' evil.

The whole "Oh Noes! Zeta is illegal!" discussion has become greatly off-topic in every BeOS/Haiku related discussion now. There are plenty of screenshots out there of BeOS/Haiku apps running in Zeta - that doesn't make them all "tainted". If anything, it proves that binary and source compatibility between BeOS/Zeta/Haiku is excellent, and we should rejoice that such a large application base already exists for all 3 of these OSes.

Update: Also regarding your BONE rant earlier - I guess you ALSO probably missed the fact that Haiku implements a very BONE-like netstack, and will most likely be binary-compatible with net_server and BONE (and probably Zeta's netstack) alike - so all those "BONE ONLY" apps will probably work fine in Haiku eventually. BONE really was a major improvement to the netstack (and some other kernel functionality) that allowed many apps to be written/ported and work when they otherwise wouldn't have been able to. So, if given the choice between having an app that requires BONE, or not having the app at all, it would seem pretty clear to me what I would choose.Edited 2007-04-18 21:46Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:42:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (umccullough)CommentsRE[4]: Might be off subject here, but...http://www.osnews.com/thread?232096
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232096Since that file is on my old website which I have not paid for for over a year I did not expect it to work.

If it stops working in the future I will move it to my new ISP/website.Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:28:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Earl Colby pottinger)CommentsRE[3]: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?232100
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232100Widespread adoption is a bad goal to have early on and very unrealistic; you end up trying to be all things to all people and get nowhere.

Being aloof by catering to the desires of a small group would also insure that its development (a) stagnates and (b) becomes so insular and narrow that outside interest can never develop. Worse, if it's too "quirky" or novel, it stands very little chance of being adopted outside its development group.

BeOS had the same goal with respect to media content you want Haiku to have. How'd that work out? Not so good last time I checked. Funny that.

Also, filmmakers don't live their lives in vacuums. Haiku shouldn't be developed in one. Focusing on too tight a niche can be as poor a strategy as being too broad. Then you might be better off talking about an application instead of an entire operating system. And with all due respect, you're moving your goalposts back years rather than forward considering how many open source, Windows, and Mac applications are already standards in filmmaking.

Hats off to anyone willing to put time and energy into creating an app for Haiku

Hats off to anyone creating apps for any OS, especially ones that can and will be used (not to mention that can and will be useful).Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:46:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (lucky13)CommentsRE[3]: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?232101
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232101why even respond to the thread with nothing but sour grapes?

You tell me -- your post is the one dripping with vinegar. I *did* offer a constructive idea in using GPL code as a base rather than reinventing the word processor wheel.

As far as your screed about configuring Linux distros, I'd be more than happy to recommend several that even a BeOS user could run (and fwiw, I've never had a "failed" Linux install). Wouldn't that be off-topic, though? :-)Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:46:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (lucky13)CommentsAll That's neededhttp://www.osnews.com/thread?232134
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232134Is compliance with Open Document standards but the rest can be done the BeOS/Haiku way.

Build the tools to take advantage of the OS but make sure they support formats that are cross platform. That is what Haiku needs from anything created for it.Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:53:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (blitze)CommentsExcellent idea, but lots of work...http://www.osnews.com/thread?232139
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232139...and BeOS has always been lots of work. But that's what makes it so nice.

Ideally, OO.o would be great of course - but since no Be-related group is in charge of its development, porting it is simply not worthwhile. But those that aren't really familiar with BeOS don't understand the translation, media, game, input, and other server systems which provide the missing-and-much-sought-after functionality in Linux/BSD/etc. We have o need for KDE or Gnome or whatever else seems to be fashionable this year (many of us Be users actully think the whole situation is somewhat comical - JUST PICK ONE DANG IT!).

What may seem to be compatability limitations to outsiders can often be hidden secrets they don't get. BeOS/Haiku/Zeta has a responsiveness Linux and BSD can't remotely compare with, but once the corporate backing of BeOS came into question commercial software abandonded it - but the users knew better. We understood what we were working with, just as Amiga users stood by their investment. And while application performance may not be any faster (or may even run slower) - the fact that the user experience was never compromised overcame any statistical shortcoming you could come up with, because it FEELS faster where it counts.

No mysterious hard drive activity, superfast boot/shutdown, reliable filesystem, real plug-and-play, and when you click - it responds. Doesn't sound like a dead OS to me...

BeOS has 10% more love than the leading open OS. Thu, 19 Apr 2007 01:26:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (JacobMunoz)CommentsRE[4]: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?232141
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232141Well, IMHO Be, Inc. failed because it didn't push hard enough on being a prime choice for media development, and it had a focus switch to being an Internet Appliance. Also, they went public which I think was a bad idea, and started their end.

I think comparing Be with Haiku doesn't work because Be's problem wasn't technology, but rather management decisions.

I don't accept the argument about "standards" in filmmaking, or anything. Plus all the indy filmmakers I know are pretty much living in a vaccuum, give them something better and they'll use it without question. Anyway, if one allowed standards to prevent developing new applications then we wouldn't get anywhere interesting.

Haiku will be the source of inspiration for people to write great software that sets new standards. Today's moaners and naysayers will thank the Haiku developers later on Thu, 19 Apr 2007 01:38:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Richard-LA)CommentsRE[5]: Couldn't he take OpenOffice and modify it ...http://www.osnews.com/thread?232165
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232165I think my point was that I don't think an "iTunes like mp3 player" is a good solution. I liked soundplay a lot, and hope the solution will be along the same lines. Offer a music player that supports multiple formats and keep video out. iTunes is just...messy.Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:23:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (aesiamun)CommentsRE[6]: Couldn't he take OpenOffice and modify it ...http://www.osnews.com/thread?232202
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232202I think you are missing a point about BeOS here.

MediaPlay plays media files - all types of media files, as long as a BeOS codec exists on the system. That is the true beauty of BeOS, things just work.Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:36:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Earl Colby pottinger)CommentsRE[3]: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?232238
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232238Talk to me about the 'ease' of configuring certain parts of any GNU/Linux distribution you care to mention. Talk to me about stability, reliability issues, re-installing Windows, failed Linux installs etc.

Addressed it on my blog with a few recommendations I suggested might be off-topic in my previous reply along with a pic of torsmo showing uptime on my most recent Linux install: 29d, 13h, 7m.

They did. That didn't catch on. It wasn't a better mousetrap -- at least the market didn't think so.

I think comparing Be with Haiku doesn't work because Be's problem wasn't technology, but rather management decisions.

I think the two went hand-in-hand. You can't catch a wave of mass support without applications. As much as I respect the design and function of microkernel OSes like BeOS and even Minix, most people are never going to use them without applications that rival (or, IMO, exceed) what's already available.

I don't accept the argument about "standards" in filmmaking

Maybe you should try. If you can't build a better mousetrap, if you can't convince others you've built a better mousetrap, they're not going to use it. Not when they already have useful, functional, feature-rich mousetraps. Geeks will care about API, kernelspace, etc. Users will only care about what it can do for them, and if it does it better than what they've already time and training.

Haiku will be the source of inspiration...

People find inspiration in all kinds of crazy crap already. I don't think Haiku is a better mousetrap, so I can't share your lofty expectations.Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:12:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (lucky13)CommentsRE[4]: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?232242
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232242So there's your stability. No crashes and nearly a full month of uptime. Try that with Haiku.

What about "pre-alpha" did you not understand?Edited 2007-04-19 16:24Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:23:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (petterhj)CommentsRE: Excellent idea, but lots of work...http://www.osnews.com/thread?232243
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232243BeOS/Haiku/Zeta has a responsiveness Linux and BSD can't remotely compare with

I don't know what your benchmarks are for such a statement, but I have excellent -- if not superior -- "responsiveness" using Linux on the same hardware which I ran BeOS. That's apples:oranges now because the difference comes down to continued development and improvements in Linux and stagnation with BeOS development.

And it also begs the question of which distro and configuration are you comparing BeOS/et al? Linux distros aren't monolithic with respect to how they load and operate -- each is unique, and there's a lot of diversity in how users set up systems. "Stripped" distros like DSL and Vector run a lot faster and more efficiently than something bloated up with eyecandy and bulkier apps and libs. Are you comparing KDE/Gnome to BeOS? Or are you comparing something that's actually on par with BeOS/Haiku?Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:24:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (lucky13)CommentsRE[5]: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?232244
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232244What about "pre-alpha" did you not understand?

Heh, that's MY point. Isn't it rich that someone ask questions about stability, ease of use/configuration, when his OS of choice has very little of any of that yet?

Linux was way ahead of Haiku at the same stages of development (with respect to time).Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:28:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (lucky13)CommentsRE[6]: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?232246
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232246Heh! Who said anything about OS of choice? You have no idea what my OS of choice is as I have yet to find a _single_ OS that fits my needs. I use three and one is GNU/Linux.

If you had read the sentence as it was intended to be read, you would be aware that the reliability, stability, re-install issues I mention are aimed at entirely at Windows, not Linux.

I stand by my bad experiences with configuring Linux _and_ failed Linux installs but you are right, this is off-topic so I won't list them here. Any amount of 'bleating' on you blog is unlikely to change my mind.Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:55:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (El-Al)CommentsRE: Hmmhttp://www.osnews.com/thread?232249
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232249Every office suite has to start somewhere. At least by starting from scratch, this guy won't inherit any of the problems that exist with current office suits (speed issues, java etc..).Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:05:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (stestagg)CommentsRE[7]: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?232250
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232250If you had read the sentence as it was intended to be read

I'm not surprised. :-)Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:09:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (lucky13)CommentsRE[5]: Couldn't he take OpenOffice and modify it ...http://www.osnews.com/thread?232252
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232252And of course, noone uses a desktop word processor. I mean, what's the use of being able to produce letters, reports, documents or anything serious on a home machine? What people really need is the ability to listen to music. When will people realise that food, beer, sleep and MP3s are the only things that people need to survive in life?

[/sarcasm]
ste.Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:11:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (stestagg)CommentsRE[3]: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?232254
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232254Widespread adoption is a bad goal to have early on and very unrealistic; you end up trying to be all things to all people and get nowhere.

- Quoth he without any ambitionThu, 19 Apr 2007 17:16:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (stestagg)CommentsRE[8]: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?232268
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232268lucky13 wrote:"Certainly would be easier than totally reinventing the wheel -- but that's what Haiku is all about, eh."

no, it's not reinventing the wheel. but since you like to lean on 'wheel' analogies so much,
you do realize that all wheels are not created equal? not only has the wheel been enhanced again and again over the course of it's history but it's also been adapted into several different versions that excel in certain terrains and conditions.

lucky13 wrote:"Haiku won't expand much further than the hobbyists who are already enthralled with its "promise" right now unless it can exceed -- not merely match, but beat the bleeping socks off -- application offering (qualitatively and quantitatively) of other OSes. No killer app, no future."

no future as in what context? again you make it as if Haiku must 'turn a profit' or else fail somewhere along the line. it doesn't have to pick up the fight with the likes of Windows, OSX or Linux in order to 'excuse it's existence'. it's a volunteer project that is free for anyone to use.

btw, what is the Linux killer app, since it does have a future it must have one, right?

I can't help but wonder why you spend so much time in Haiku oriented topics. you state that Haiku is irrelevant and yet commenting on it seems extremely relevant to you. personally, if I find something irrelevant I simply move on.

finally, there will always be those who sit on their arse and and preach about what can and can't be done. these are the people who will never achieve anything. then we have those who challenges these naysayers and often ends up redefining exactly what is and isn't possible.Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:25:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Valhalla)CommentsRE[9]: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?232461
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232461Valhalla:
no, it's not reinventing the wheel.

Yes, it is. From the Haiku "about" page:
Why Haiku?

As a tool, software is a means to an end, and not an end in itself. The Be Operating System introduced progressive concepts and technologies that we believe represent the ideal means to the end of desktop computing. Haiku will be the realization of those concepts and technologies in the form of an operating system that is open source and free.http://haiku-os.org/about

Valhalla:
no future as in what context?

As in being relevant enough that it will ever "catch on" directly by attracting users of other OSes OR indirectly in offering a technology that can be used widely in other environments. The former is unlikely because most people generally won't adopt another OS for the sake of novelty -- and at this point, that's the only reason they would switch. People will switch if they feel a pressing need to: for security reasons (such as fatigue of dealing with malware), for performance reasons, for productivity reasons (ease of use, killer app), etc.

The latter is very unlikely for two reasons. First, whatever was worth imitating or emulating from BeOS has already been done (if anything, the reverse is far more likely now: Haiku has already benefited or will benefit more from other projects than it will inspire other projects). Second, there hasn't exactly been a rush of brainpower -- quantity or quality -- to Haiku development like there was when Linus posted his announcement.

Valhalla:
you make it as if Haiku must 'turn a profit'

Strawman. I never said anything about "profit," all my comments about Haiku have been targeted at the following benchmarks:
- user adoption
- application availability
- technological relevance

In that case, thanks for replying. :-)Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:26:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (lucky13)CommentsRE[6]: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?232585
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232585Linux was way ahead of Haiku at the same stages of development (with respect to time).

That's because all the GNU utilities already existed in full versions before the linux kernel ever existed. If all the Haiku people had to work on was a kernel replacement for BeOS it would be a hell of a lot more stable and quite a bit farther along.

Why can't people put ideas together properly?Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:43:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Steven)CommentsRE[3]: Look at the screenshots...http://www.osnews.com/thread?232660
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232660Given the severely illegal status of Zeta, as dictated by Access, I wouldn't want a single pixel from Zeta to get anywhere NEAR Haiku! Tainted code taints EVERYTHING! It's like GPL! Even worse!

Oh come on now, how much can you possibly exaggerate? This is nothing like GPL... I mean, for one thing, we can all agree we would much rather use Illegally obtained code for our projects than subject ourselves to the GPL.

It seems to me that Luposian totally blew things out of proportion here, comparing things to the GPL is like comparing someone to Hitler, it's just not cool man! Be realistic!Sat, 21 Apr 2007 01:41:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Steven)CommentsRE[7]: Couldn't he take OpenOffice and modify it ...http://www.osnews.com/thread?232745
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232745No, i get it. I don't agree with it.

I don't like all in one software apps. Just like I don't like all in one phones, stereos, dvd + tv players, etc...Sat, 21 Apr 2007 18:32:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (aesiamun)CommentsOffice Suite???http://www.osnews.com/thread?232767
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232767Since Firefox runs on Haiku you already have an office suite: docs.google.com

Even big companies are using it, so why not the 0.003324% of the world that uses Haiku?Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:41:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (@@__@@)CommentsRE: Office Suite???http://www.osnews.com/thread?232908
http://www.osnews.com/thread?232908Since Firefox runs on Haiku you already have an office suite: docs.google.com

I can think of three good reasons not to:
(1) security
(2) reliability
(3) no guarantee of availability.

You've done a pretty good job of ensuring that the "discussion" is not worth contributing to in any serious way. It's also painfully evident, based on the numerous infantile cheapshots you've posted in this thread, that you yourself have absolutely no interest in anything resembling adult discourse (the bitter rants on your blog are ample proof of that).

If you so long for substantive discussion, then perhaps you ought to offer some actual substantive criticism - as opposed to the juvenile mudslinging and bitter rants you've posted here and on your blog. So far, you don't appear to be doing anything other than cherry-picking the most obviously-false claims related to Haiku and then using those claims to draw generalized, disingenuous conclusions. In other words, pretty much the exact opposite of the actions that one takes when they're interested in rational, adult discussion.Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:34:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (StephenBeDoper)CommentsRE[7]: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?233466
http://www.osnews.com/thread?233466> Did you have anything substantive to add to the discussion?

You've done a pretty good job of ensuring that the "discussion" is not worth contributing to in any serious way.

So that's a no then. What are the rules here again about personal attacks? I've addressed some pretty serious shortcomings of an OS, not made personal statements about individuals like you have.

Want more shortcomings? How about the fact that Haiku pays homage to Win95 in being available only for single user? How about the (in)security issues R1 will be plagued with because of that AND the fact that it lacks any protection via permission levels -- something even MS finally/reluctantly addressed in NT/ME/XP/Vista by adding an administrator level?

Good thing it doesn't take long to boot Haiku -- you're already in good practice for trying to reclaim your computer from 10 year-old Lithuanians.

Edit: While I'm on the subject of security, can you still call delete_area() universally in Haiku?http://www.haiku-security.com/index.php?sname=alerts Edited 2007-04-24 14:07Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:54:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (lucky13)CommentsRE[8]: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?233683
http://www.osnews.com/thread?233683Considering your blog, where you're posting an obsessive level of FUD, doesn't have a comments facility I'll just have to respond to some of your crap here

You claim that GSoC resources are being used to write a word processor - they're not. The person working on one is coincidentally a GSoC mentor - this does not mean that any Google resources are being used.

Based on you making two inaccuracy-laden posts in one day about an OS I doubt you're ever likely to use, about all one can take from that is that you're a vindicative little child, worried that competition to whatever OS it is you love is a bad thing.

You also have an unhealthy obsession with Baltic teenagers. Think you might need to keep this in check.Edited 2007-04-24 22:16Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:14:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (MYOB)CommentsRE[9]: Why nothttp://www.osnews.com/thread?233889
http://www.osnews.com/thread?2338891. My blog does allow comments. Register and you can leave comments -- just like here.

2. I stand corrected about Haiku's use of GSoC funding.

3. You can quibble over semantics all you want, but I stand by my claim that Haiku's net stack isn't functional. Is a car that can be driven five blocks at a time but then has to be pushed the rest of the trip functional? No.

4.a. My posts aren't inaccurate.
b. I have used Haiku (look -- I even have a link to it on the blog).
c. Name-calling. You can be modded down for that.
d. Competition? I use three OSes (Linux, OpenBSD, and XP). I would gladly use a fourth, fifth, sixth, etc., if it were stable, reliable, had useful apps, etc.