"Dell today leaked a memo to the press, hoping to prove that it's serious about making a strong comeback. CEO Michael Dell penned the memo that went out first to employees and then shortly thereafter to the Wall Street Journal, once Dell's PR team gave the all clear. The e-mail made ample use of broad statements and rhetoric to rally troops around the Dell 2.0 concept, which has a revitalized Dell trying new things like being nice to consumers to get back in the hardware game. In particular, Dell will work to make its management, manufacturing, supply chain and customer service more efficient, CEO Dell said in the memo."

You know a company is in trouble when they have to come up with buzzphrases (Dell 2.0?) to try and gee themselves up. You know a company is in real trouble when no one has any idea what those buzzphrases mean, nor is any plan of action communicated to anyone in the company. Sorry guys, there are no bonuses and we're in a spot of bother, but don't worry, we're going to expand small and medium sized business and expand services! Quite what that means is anyone's guess.

Yes, and we need to create more value for our customers by shortening development cycles and modifying reference designs even less than before!

Dell is discovering that a new business model can shake up an industry, but as what was once new becomes old hat, the mature market becomes less profitable. Computers can be built from parts. That doesn't mean that life is wonderful for the middle-man. Intel might as well buy Dell out of its misery and "go direct" to the customer.

Calling them bastards is kind of harsh. It's not like they're rude for the most part. Most are very courteous and patient, far more than I would be anyway. The issue is that in many situations, the language barrier creates what can already be a tense and difficult situation(support calls) and make them even worse. This especially becomes difficult if you deviate from the script.

The call center people aren't to blame for this, it's the cheap executives that want to save a buck anywhere they can so in turn their salaries go up and maybe the stock will appreciate by a few cents. What they realize but probably don't care is that actions like moving call centers to India are just symptoms of the corporate greed and rot which put Dell in the situation that they are.

If Michael Dell can turn this around, who cares if they call it Dell 2.0 or The New Deal. It's just a phrase or idea to rally around.

Calling them bastards is kind of harsh. It's not like they're rude for the most part. Most are very courteous and patient, far more than I would be anyway. The issue is that in many situations, the language barrier creates what can already be a tense and difficult situation(support calls) and make them even worse. This especially becomes difficult if you deviate from the script.

You're right, when I read the original post, it sounded like a disgruntled former Dell employee who has an axe to grind about overseas call centres.

For me, I certainly don't find it difficult to understand those who have a strong accent, nor do I find that they have difficulty understanding me - infact, I have the most problem when I get redirected to a US based call centre and they fail to understand my strong New Zealand accent, and yet, when I get put through to one in the UK, India or some other place, they have no problems.

The call center people aren't to blame for this, it's the cheap executives that want to save a buck anywhere they can so in turn their salaries go up and maybe the stock will appreciate by a few cents. What they realize but probably don't care is that actions like moving call centers to India are just symptoms of the corporate greed and rot which put Dell in the situation that they are.

The problem isn't about moving call centres to India, that is a symptom of a larger problem, and that is large organisations who refuse to spend the money to adequately train their customer service representatives.

This isn't just isolated to the IT sector; I worked in a supermarket for a few years as a wine department manager, and it amazed me how little people know about the products we sold in the store.

I had to literally train up from the ground on up each person who was delegated to my department; the differences in wine, marrying wine and food, explaining the complex flavours and aroma's to customers - how to upsell products that are on special.

My fellow managers thought I was making a mountain out of a mole hill, but guess what? after one year our sales rocketed upwards; higher margins, more volume - a little time spent investing into customer service training.

If Michael Dell can turn this around, who cares if they call it Dell 2.0 or The New Deal. It's just a phrase or idea to rally around.

It isn't what it is being called, but the fact that its all bullcrap, smoke and mirrors; he is trying to be a Steve Jobs and create a Dell like "Reality Distortion Field" by making out that what they do at Dell is earth shattering and world changing - code they write, every customer they talk to could revolutionise the industry.

What Dell need to do is to stop trying to be the 'cheaper one' and come out and be the one which provides the whole kit for an organisation; if that means rallying around Linux, buying out someone like Connical, and create a Linux out of the box solution, using opensource components, then that is what they should do.

They need something to differentiate themselves more than just price alone; there is no use screaming 'volume, volume, volume" if your profits are in the toilet - it should be able maximising profits and profit margins, selling value added services, quality middleware - the whole nine yards.

This is where the likes of Sun are well places; they can provide to an organisation the complete setup; for the desktop in an organisation they have Solaris plus the Sun Ray appliance, they have massive servers, storage devices, automated tape libraries, middleware.

The major problem with offshoring is that it removes jobs from the homesoil they are generated on. Nothing, IMO, could be less patriotic. And we're not talking production-line shoemaking here, either - we're talking about taking knowledgeworker jobs out of the US (or insert your country) and selling them off to the lowest bidder. This means that there is a shift downwards of what a knowledgeworker's skills are worth.

As far as Dell goes, I guess it's must suck to be an x86 boxshifter at this point. It's a swamped industry, there is a major glut of product, and the more quickly they push cheaper boxes out the door, the more quickly they will slit their own throats. And hopefully without sounding like an outright marxist, I'd say that "more efficient" is almost always going to be bad for the employee. More efficient means more work for the same workforce, or fewer workers to do the same job. More efficient hardly ever means redesign processes and make sure people are happy and *want* to do good work.

Disgruntled employee? Ha. No, actually I've been on the receiving end of a few of those phone calls. I've lost jobs to Asia, but not to India.

Yes, I realize it's a couple of suits who are pushing Dell on the "global economy" but your support should still be regional, at least, for your customer's sake. Level 1 and 2 techs are bad enough, now throw up the language barrier and people start running to HP.

As a northerner over here, it's hard to talk to someone with a strong southern drawl in the US. There's slang involved, dialect, and tempo. Even heavy New York, or that real annoying Bawston accent is hard to discern over a crummy telephone connection.

Companies will pay the premium if they know they are getting a solid return on their investment. The fact that most IT managers shudder at the thought of buying from Dell is the problem. They need to perfect building solid computer systems with earth-shattering customer support first. Once the reputation gets the makeover, they can then focus on becoming the wall-street darling again....instead of Dell on Earth.

Hardin threw himself back in the chair. "You know, that's the most interesting part of the whole business. [...] I took the liberty of recording all his statements."
[...]
Lundin Crast said, "And where is the analysis?"

"That," replied Hardin, "is the interesting thing. The analysis was the most difficult of the three by all odds. When Holk, after two days of steady work, succeeded in eliminating meaningless statements, vague gibberish, useless qualifications – in short, all the goo and dribble – he found he had nothing left. Everything canceled out."

"Lord Dorwin, gentlemen, in five days of discussion didn't say one damned thing, and said it so you never noticed. There are the assurances you had from your precious Empire."

Quality. Dells quality had declined over the past 9 years or so. Dells use to be High Quality Computers, now they are just as cheap and crappy as all the rest. If anyone ask me for a good computer I recomend Lenovo, or Apple (Depending if they want to switch OS's or not). When you choose additional hardware for the system make sure it works.

3rd Party Stuff (related to quality) the Default install should be bloaded with Junk a Clean install of the OS, and the Software the person choose to get installed like Office. Give them a clean good install.

Simplify Purchases, Coupons, different and illogical prices for Home, Small Buisness and Large Buisness. Normally confuses and annoys the customer

USB Ports that allow you to plug in at 90 degree angle to the case. (It may be for one model and I think they have fixed it sence but ithat 30 degree USB port is damn annoying)

I agree with you 100%. I'd like to buy good/reliable systems even though it costs me extra $$$. In my case, I'd love to buy another used Dell Precision Workstation 450/650 than any brand new Dimension series. But for notebook, I will stick to IBM Thinkpad series.

For some strange reason, I'm reminded of a comment that Mr. Dell made in regards to Apple a while back...

From a New York Times article:

"In 1997, shortly after Mr. Jobs returned to Apple, the company he helped start in 1976, Dell's founder and chairman, Michael S. Dell, was asked at a technology conference what might be done to fix Apple, then deeply troubled financially.

"What would I do?" Mr. Dell said to an audience of several thousand information technology managers. "I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders."

Even though their hardware is relatively inexpensive, I am not going to support them until they stop using Indian call centers. I am a tolerant person, but the cultural and language barrier is too deep to get even simple tasks accomplished by phone.