Not really. I'm not sure how one can say with irrefutable evidence that the hit to the twig n berries wasn't by accident.

If he was fined then he should have been suspended. If he was fined, that means the NFL thought he did something wrong and the something wrong that he did deserves a suspension. There shouldn't be one without the other. Either the NFL thinks he tried to hit Schuab in the goods or he didn't. Either a fine and suspension if they thought he was in the wrong or nothing. Can't see how they can do one without the other.

Not really. I'm not sure how one can say with irrefutable evidence that the hit to the twig n berries wasn't by accident.

If he was fined then he should have been suspended. If he was fined, that means the NFL thought he did something wrong and the something wrong that he did deserves a suspension. There shouldn't be one without the other. Either the NFL thinks he tried to hit Schuab in the goods or he didn't. Either a fine and suspension if they thought he was in the wrong or nothing. Can't see how they can do one without the other.

That's true. I suppose I don't advocate a fine either. Not enough there o prove it was undeniably intentional IMO._________________

KingTarvaris7 wrote:

last year's vikings were far better than the packers team that just won

The only thing horseschit IMO is the possibility of a fine. How can you say "we can't say for certain that you did this on purpose, so you won't be suspended."

BUT THEN

They say "well, we kinda think you might have done it, so here's a fine."

If I was Suh I'd be pissed.

Right or wrong, I think his reputation had something to do with the decision.

Persoanlly, there's no doubt in my mind it was intentional.

Oh, me either. I believe 100% he had malicious intent in doing it. I can understand why they didn't because of the video evidence, but why does he fall down, and then his foot magically pops back up? Right into Schaub's GROIN no less.

Unless he can defy the laws of gravity, I'm not sure how that could be viewed as "whoops I was stretching my leg out not trying to kick you."_________________

Since were discussing fines.. how does mcmilly get a 21k fine for a football play while bunkley gets away with 20k for kicking a guy in the head. Both are head related fines, while one is obviously malicious while the other is just a football play where maybe jerron is a bit too high.

The only thing horseschit IMO is the possibility of a fine. How can you say "we can't say for certain that you did this on purpose, so you won't be suspended."

BUT THEN

They say "well, we kinda think you might have done it, so here's a fine."

If I was Suh I'd be pissed.

Right or wrong, I think his reputation had something to do with the decision.

Persoanlly, there's no doubt in my mind it was intentional.

Oh, me either. I believe 100% he had malicious intent in doing it. I can understand why they didn't because of the video evidence, but why does he fall down, and then his foot magically pops back up? Right into Schaub's GROIN no less.

Unless he can defy the laws of gravity, I'm not sure how that could be viewed as "whoops I was stretching my leg out not trying to kick you."

He straight up kicked Schaub in the groin intentionally. One of these days, an opposing player is going to have enough of his dirty play and take it upon themselves to remove him from the game by force. Can't say I would be upset if that did indeed happen. Maybe that's the only way he'll truly get the message.

Can't say I disagree. There's only so much an oline is going to put up with when you're taking cheap shots at their QB before they all agree to teach you a lesson and dive at your knee(s)._________________