Electric Power Monthly

Data for January 2015 | Release Date: March 27, 2015 | Next Release: April 21, 2015
| full report

Previous Issues

Issue: Format:

SAS Output

Table 4.17. Receipts and Quality of Coal by Rank Delivered for Electricity Generation:

Commercial Sector by State, January 2015

Bituminous

Subbituminous

Lignite

Census Divisionand State

Receipts (Thousand Tons)

Average Sulfur Percent by Weight

Average Ash Percent by Weight

Receipts (Thousand Tons)

Average Sulfur Percent by Weight

Average Ash Percent by Weight

Receipts (Thousand Tons)

Average Sulfur Percent by Weight

Average Ash Percent by Weight

New England

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Connecticut

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Maine

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Massachusetts

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

New Hampshire

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Rhode Island

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Vermont

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Middle Atlantic

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

New Jersey

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

New York

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Pennsylvania

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

East North Central

1

2.38

7.9

0

--

--

0

--

--

Illinois

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Indiana

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Michigan

1

2.38

7.9

0

--

--

0

--

--

Ohio

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Wisconsin

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

West North Central

11

3.03

8.6

0

--

--

0

--

--

Iowa

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Kansas

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Minnesota

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Missouri

11

3.03

8.6

0

--

--

0

--

--

Nebraska

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

North Dakota

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

South Dakota

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

South Atlantic

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Delaware

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

District of Columbia

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Florida

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Georgia

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Maryland

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

North Carolina

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

South Carolina

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Virginia

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

West Virginia

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

East South Central

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Alabama

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Kentucky

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Mississippi

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Tennessee

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

West South Central

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Arkansas

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Louisiana

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Oklahoma

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Texas

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Mountain

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Arizona

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Colorado

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Idaho

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Montana

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Nevada

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

New Mexico

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Utah

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Wyoming

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Pacific Contiguous

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

California

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Oregon

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Washington

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Pacific Noncontiguous

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Alaska

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

Hawaii

0

--

--

0

--

--

0

--

--

U.S. Total

12

2.97

8.5

0

--

--

0

--

--

NM = Not meaningful due to large relative standard error or excessive percentage change.
W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.

Notes:
Starting in January 2013, there may be a shift in the continuity of Chapter 4 Tables, due to changes in the sample design of Form EIA-923 and the imputation process.
See the Instrument Design History section of the Form EIA-923 Technical Notes for a more detailed explanation of these changes.
See Glossary for definitions. Values for 2014 and 2015 are preliminary. See Technical Notes for a discussion of the sample design for the Form EIA-923.