Banana Republic vs Adhocracy

Refers to 'politically unstable country that economically depends upon the exports of a limited resources (usually fruits, crops), which is dominated by a rich businessmen or other elites and has a impoverished working class. It a a derogatory term.

A flexible type of organizational philosophy

1.1 Oxford Dictionary

Small state that is politically unstable as a result of the domination of its economy by a single export controlled by foreign capital.

A system which is flexible, informal and is adaptable to changes.

1.2 Cambridge Dictionary

A small country, especially in South and Central America, that is poor, corrupt, and badly ruled.

A type of government that banishes any bureaucratic lines to capture opportunity and get results for problems.

1.3 Merriam-Webster Dictionary

A small dependent country usually of the tropics; especially,one run despotically.

A system of government which utilizes organizations which are set up to accomplish specific tasks.

1.4 Etymology

1.4.1 Word Origin Language Text

ND

The word adhocracy comes from the latin phrase Ad hoc which means for the purpose.

1.4.2 Latin root Text

ND

ND

1.4.3 Greek root Text

ND

ND

1.4.4 Word Origin Language(s)

Mande, Not Available

Latin

1.4.5 Latin Root

Not Available

Not Applicable

1.4.6 Greek Root

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

1.4.7 Other

république (French)

ad hoc (English)

1.4.8 Word Origin Period

16th century AD

20th century AD

1.5 Similar Government Types

2 Characteristics

2.1 Government Class

Other

Other

2.1.1 Government Class Text

ND

ND

2.2 Advantages

Equality, Flexiblity, No single person rule, People have the say, People's rights, Prevents monopoly of authority

Adaptable to changes, Flexiblity, Individualism

2.2.1 AdvantagesText

ND

Since this system is flexible it can adapt to the changes required according to the situation. This encourages individual empowerment. Also, there is no hierarchy, which makes the system less stringent.

This form of government does not have any definitive structure. Thus, it lacks a proper leadership. This also leads to chaos and disorder at times. The process of the system is comparitively slower.

2.4 Structure

2.4.1 Majority Rule

✔✘

45%Other Governments Governments have it !

✔✘

45%Other Governments Governments have it !

2.4.2 Power Resides in

Private owners

Specialists

2.4.3 Voting

✔✘

33%Other Governments Governments have it !

✔✘

33%Other Governments Governments have it !

2.4.4 Succession

Neither Heritance nor Elective

Neither Heritance nor Elective

2.4.5 Parliament

Absent

Sometimes present

2.4.6 Constitution

Absent

Sometimes present

2.4.7 Legislature Size

Small

Not Defined

2.4.8 Political Stability

Unstable

Unstable

2.4.9 Economic Stability

Stable

Unstable

2.5 Based on Religion

✔✘

NoOther Governments Governments has it !

✔✘

NoOther Governments Governments has it !

2.5.1 Freedom of Religion

✔✘

91%Other Governments Governments have it !

✔✘

91%Other Governments Governments have it !

3 Countries

3.1 Asian

Bangladesh, Laos, Maldives, Philippines

Not present

3.2 European

NA

Not present

3.3 African

Botswana, Ghana, Nigeria, Zambia

Not present

3.4 North American

Cuba, Guatemala, Honduras

Not present

3.5 South American

Chile

Not present

3.6 Others

Tuvalu

Not present

3.7 Ancient Regime

3.7.1 Asia

Not Available

Not Available

3.7.2 Europe

Not Available

Not Available

3.7.3 Africa

Not Available

Not Available

3.7.4 North America

Not Available

Not Available

3.7.5 South America

Not Available

Not Available

3.7.6 Other

Not Available

Not Available

4 History

NA

A system or concept of recent origin.

4.1 Origin

4.1.1 Place of Origin

Latin America

North America

4.1.2 Period of Origin

19th century AD

20th century AD

4.1.3 Origin Era

A.D.

A.D.

4.1.4 Place of origin Text

ND

ND

4.1.5 Period of Origin Text

ND

ND

4.2 Famous Quotes

"In the consultation of this small, maritime banana republic was a forgotten section that provided for the maintenance of a navy." - O Henry

NA

4.3 Famous Leaders

O. Henry

Alvin Toffler

4.4 Modern

4.4.1 Early Modern

In the modern world developing countries are experiencing a similar problem, where they are relying purely on one product or industry to carry their entire country.

No early moder history as the concept is of recent origin.

4.4.2 18th and 19th Century

NA

Not present

4.4.3 20th and 21st Century

Countries that obtained independence from colonial powers in the 20th and 21st centuries have at times thereafter tended to share traits of banana republics due to influence of large private corporations in their politics.

1970: Alvin Toffler came up with the term Adhocracy, 1979: This concept was elaborated further by Canadian author Henry Mintzberg.

Difference Between Banana Republic and Adhocracy

Generally, a new type of government is established when its earlier alternative fails to fulfill the needs of citizens. When such a type of government is established, the positive attributes of the previous government are retained whereas, the negative attributes are changed. Similarly, Banana Republic and Adhocracy were established. So, what exactly is the difference between Banana Republic and Adhocracy? These two types of government are differentiated based on factors like definition, ideologies, characteristics, structure, etc. The widely used definition of Banana Republic is "Refers to 'politically unstable country that economically depends upon the exports of a limited resources (usually fruits, crops), which is dominated by a rich businessmen or other elites and has a impoverished working class. It a a derogatory term." whereas, Adhocracy is defined as "A flexible type of organizational philosophy".

Comparison of Banana Republic vs Adhocracy

Comparison of Banana Republic vs Adhocracy proves to be significant when we are studying different types of governments. Banana Republic and Adhocracy may differ drastically in their principles or they could be such government forms, which are derived from one another. These principles and other details can be studied at Banana Republic Definition and Adhocracy Definition.

Banana Republic vs Adhocracy History:Comparison of Banana Republic vs Adhocracy history tells us how these types of governments have evolved over time. Banana Republic has originated in 19th century AD whereas Adhocracy took roots in 20th century AD. Founders or advocates of Banana Republic are O. Henry and people who have contributed in the progress of Adhocracy are Alvin Toffler.

Banana Republic vs Adhocracy Characteristics:While comparing Banana Republic vs Adhocracy characterisitcs it is essential to consider the benefits and demerits of both the types of governments. Equality, Flexiblity, No single person rule, People have the say, People's rights, Prevents monopoly of authority are the advantages of Banana Republic whereas Adhocracy advantages are Adaptable to changes, Flexiblity, Individualism. Banana Republic has demerits like No defined structure, Slower process, Lack of clearly defined leadership, Disorder whereas; No defined structure, Slower process, Lack of clearly defined leadership, Disorder are the disadvantages of Adhocracy

Compare Banana Republic vs Adhocracy Structure:

When you compare Banana Republic vs Adhocracy structure the factors to be considered are majority rule, succession, presence of parliament and constitution.

Majority rule is present in Banana Republic. While in Adhocracy, Majority Rule is present.

The succession rule applied in Banana Republic is Neither Heritance nor Elective and that in Adhocracy is Neither Heritance nor Elective.

Parliament is Absent in Banana Republic and in Adhocracy parliament is Sometimes present.

Constitution is Absent in Banana Republic and in Adhocracy constitution is Sometimes present.