If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You chastised Eli Manning's Giants for going 9-7. How is it now that regular season wins are irrelevant and 9-7 is ok? Ohhh b/c it suits the Jets!

am I calling mark Sanchez an elite QB? the arguments were completely different. If I said Sanchez is elite then you could use that line but I didn't. I'm starting to think I really am smart, thank you.

am I calling mark Sanchez an elite QB? the arguments were completely different. If I said Sanchez is elite then you could use that line but I didn't. I'm starting to think I really am smart, thank you.

You don't consider Eli elite though. You have put Sanchez on Eli's level many times by saying that Sanchez could have won both Super Bowls that Eli did. If regular seasons matter for Eli (who you don't think is elite) then they should matter for Sanchez (who you don't think is elite)

am I calling mark Sanchez an elite QB? the arguments were completely different. If I said Sanchez is elite then you could use that line but I didn't. I'm starting to think I really am smart, thank you.

You've criticized Eli Manning and the Giants for not having stellar reg season records but now you say reg season wins don't matter. Explain. Don't deflect.

You don't consider Eli elite though. You have put Sanchez on Eli's level many times by saying that Sanchez could have won both Super Bowls that Eli did. If regular seasons matter for Eli (who you don't think is elite) then they should matter for Sanchez (who you don't think is elite)

The argument was about Eli being elite, one of the reasons was he had SB caliber teams and led them to 9 and 10 wins in those years, he has also led his team to missing 3 of the last 4 postseasons. if I was saying mark Sanchez is elite I'd use the same criteria.

You've criticized Eli Manning and the Giants for not having stellar reg season records but now you say reg season wins don't matter. Explain. Don't deflect.

Let me explain this again ssssslllllllllooooooowwwwwwwwlllllllllllyyyyyyyyy

W/ one argument we were arguing if Eli is elite, one of my arguments against him was he hasn't had the reg season consistency to be elite as we saw in 2 SB years where they won 9 and 10 games. he had SB talent and could only win 9 and 10 games, in the 9 win year of 2011 he played in a very weak division and could only lead them to 9 wins. Combine that w/ missing 3 of the last 4 postseasons and it isn't elite worthy. What does that have to do w/ Mark Sanchez? at what point was I saying mark is elite? you are smart enough not to confuse 2 totally different arguments.

The argument was about Eli being elite, one of the reasons was he had SB caliber teams and led them to 9 and 10 wins in those years, he has also led his team to missing 3 of the last 4 postseasons. if I was saying mark Sanchez is elite I'd use the same criteria.

How many regular season wins each season does it take for you to consider a QB elite? Why do they matter for elite QBs but not other QBs. For a guy who places so much value on a QBs worth from two divisional round wins, I would think you would put a lot more value on 2 Super Bowls wins.

Let me explain this again ssssslllllllllooooooowwwwwwwwlllllllllllyyyyyyyyy

W/ one argument we were arguing if Eli is elite, one of my arguments against him was he hasn't had the reg season consistency to be elite as we saw in 2 SB years where they won 9 and 10 games. he had SB talent and could only win 9 and 10 games, in the 9 win year of 2011 he played in a very weak division and could only lead them to 9 wins. Combine that w/ missing 3 of the last 4 postseasons and it isn't elite worthy. What does that have to do w/ Mark Sanchez? at what point was I saying mark is elite? you are smart enough not to confuse 2 totally different arguments.

None of what you said is relevant since you said reg season wins are irrelevant.