Those who consult soothsayers or so-called “hecantontarchs” of other such
fortune-tellers in the hope of learning from them whatever may be revealed to
them, in accordance with what the Fathers had formerly decided in regard to
them, let them incur the canon of six years. The same penalty ought to be
inflicted also upon those who lead bears after them, or other such animals, for
the purpose of sport and harm of the more simple-minded, and who tell the
fortune, and fate, and genealogy, and other such things to the populace, in
accordance with the rigmarole of delusion. As for those who are called
cloud-chasers and enchanters and amuletics and soothsayers, if they persist in
these professions, and refuse to change their occupation and to eschew these
ruinous practices and Greek “rackets,” we decree that they be thrown out of the
Church altogether, in conformity with what the sacred Canons also prescribe.
“For what communion hath light with darkness?” as the Apostle says;
“or what agreement hath a temple of God with idols? Or what portion hath a
believer with an infidel? And what concord hath Christ with Belial?” (II
Cor. 6:15–16).

Interpretation.

Christians must not affect any of those wicked things which the Greeks used
to affect — divination, that is to say, and charms, and other similar things. On
this account the present Canon decrees that those Christians shall be compelled
to abstain from the Mysteries for six years who consult soothsayers, and men
calling themselves hecantontarchs, and others of the kind, with a view to
learning from them whatever occult things they wish (in order to find money or
other things they have lost, for instance), just as previous Fathers have
canonically penalized them. It also in like manner with the above canonizes for
six years also those who drag bears or other such animals along with them for
sport and harm of simple-minded persons; and also those who tell fortunes of men
and what they are to get in the future and that they were born on a lucky or
unlucky day and other such delusive sayings. It likewise canonizes also those
persons who were called “cloud-chasers,” and “enchanters,” and “amuletics” and
soothsayers. Accordingly, all of them are to receive this canon if they repent
and abandon such ruinous, devilish, and Greek “rackets.” If, however, they
persist in this wickedness and delusion, and do not give it up, they are to be
driven away from the Church of Christ altogether and are to be excluded from the
society of Christians, just as the divine Canons prescribe. For what communion
has light with darkness? or what union has the temple of God with the altar of
idols? what portion has a believer with an unbeliever? or what concord has
Christ with the Devil, as St. Paul says? But we must note that the penalty
provided by the present Canon is provided for laymen only, as much for those who
perform such diabolical works and magic as we have enumerated above, as for
those who consult them. For any clergymen and persons in holy orders that should
do such things would surely be deposed from office, according to Balsamon and
Zonaras, without fail.

Canon LXII.

We wish once for all to extirpate from the life of the faithful the so-called
(festival of) the calends, or kalends, and the so-called Vota, and the so-called
Brumalia, and the public festival celebrated on the first day of March.
Furthermore, the public dances of women, which are calculated to wreak great
harm and injury. Furthermore we dismiss also the dances and ritualistic
ceremonies performed by men or women in the name of what are falsely called gods
among Greeks, after an old custom which is alien to the life of Christians, at
the same time decreeing that no man shall put on any feminine costume, nor shall
a woman put on any that befits men. But neither shall anybody put on comic, or
satyric, or tragic masks; neither shall anybody shout the name of abominable
Dionysus while engaged in squeezing grapes in the wine-presses; nor, when
pouring the wine into the casks shall they provoke laughter by a show of
ignorance or of vanity, by producing the effects of demoniacal delusion. As for
those who from now on attempt to carry out any of the aforesaid improprieties,
while well aware of what they are doing, if they should be clergymen, we command
that they be deposed from office; but if laymen, that they be excommunicated.

Interpretation.

The calends (also spelled kalends) were the first days of every month, on
which the Greeks were accustomed to celebrate in order as they hoped to pass the
whole month merrily. The Vota and Brumalia, on the other hand, were Greek
festivals. The Vota, referring to grazing and sheep, were celebrated in honor of
the god Pan, who was supposed by the Greeks to be the patron of sheep and other
animals. The Brumalia were celebrated in honor of Dionysus; for the epithet of
Dionysus among the Greeks of the north was Bromius, derived from bromos,
a Greek word signifying a peal as of thunder. By the Romans he was called
Brumalius, and his festival Brumalia, in the plural, which is the
equivalent of Dionysia, as the Greeks called it. So the present Canon commands
that such festivals, but especially the public one celebrated on the first day
of March, for the pretended purpose of securing good weather in spring, be
eliminated altogether from the public and private life of Christians. Nor must
public dances in general of women be held, nor festivals and dances by men or
women in honor of the name of the pseudo gods of the Greeks. It decrees in
addition that neither must men wear women’s clothing, nor women men’s clothing.
But neither must they disguise themselves with false faces and masks that are
comic, or, in other words, calculated to provoke laughter, or tragic, or
calculated to provoke laments and tears, or satyric, or, in other words
peculiar, to Satyrs and Bacchi, who in honor of Dionysus were wont to dance
ecstatically and as if demon-possessed. And that no one should invoke, or call
upon, the name of despicable Dionysus (who was supposed to be the giver and
patron of wine) when treading the grapes in the winepresses, nor laugh and
guffaw when the new wine is being transferred to the pitharia, as these
are called in modern Greek, being a kind of earthen casks. So whoever from now
on, after becoming fully aware of these prohibitions, shall attempt to do any of
the aforesaid things which are demonish and Greekish, if he is a clergyman, let
him be deposed from office but if he is a layman, let him be
excommunicated.

Canon LXIII.

With regard to the falsely compiled martyr-lists fabricated by the enemies of
the truth, as if with an intention to dishonor the Martyrs of Christ and to lead
those paying attention to it into disbelief, we command that it must not be read
publicly even in the churches, but that these things must be consigned to fire.
As for those who accept them and recognize them as veridical, or those who
bestow any attention upon them as true, we anathematize such persons.

Interpretation.

Infidels and enemies of the truth, wishing to bring accusations against
Christians’ records, composed, it would seem, certain ludicrous and grotesque
utterances and deeds with the allegation that the Martyrs of Christ said and did
those things, in order that the Martyrs might incur insults as a consequence
thereof, and the Orthodox faith be laughed to scorn. Hence the present Canon
commands that no such fictitious lists be read publicly in churches, but instead
that they be burned up. Those, on the other hand, who accept them as true are
anathematized. See also Ap. c. LX.

Canon LXIV.

That a layman must not publicly make a speech or teach, thus investing
himself with the dignity of a teacher, but, instead, must submit to the
ordinance handed down by the Lord, and to open his ear wide to them who have
received the grace of teaching ability, and to be taught by them the divine
facts thoroughly. For in the one Church God created different members, according
to the utterance of the Apostle, in interpreting which St. Gregory the
Theologian clearly presents the right procedure in these matters by saying: “Let
us have respect for this procedure, brethren, and let us observe it. First, let
one man be a listener, as the hearing recipient; another, the tongue; another, a
hand; another, something else; let one man teach, and let another man learn; and
after short periods, as touching one who learns in a state of obedience, and one
who leads the chorus in hilarity, and one who renders service in cheerfulness
and willingness, let us not all be a tongue, heeding the most apt saying:
“Let us not all be Apostles; let us not all be Prophets; let us not all be
Interpreters” (1 Cor. 12:29), and after somewhat: “Why are you making out
that you are a shepherd, when you are a sheep? Why are you becoming a head, when
you happen to be a foot? Why are you attempting to be a general, when you are
placed in the ranks of (ordinary) soldiers? And from another quarter Wisdom
bids: “Be not hasty in words; vie not with a rich man when thou art
indigent” (Prov. 23:4); nor seek to be wiser than the wise. If anyone be
caught disobeying the present Canon, let him be excommunicated for forty days.

Interpretation.

The present Canon prohibits any layman from teaching openly and in church as
a teacher; instead he should rather himself be taught by those who have received
the gracious gift of teaching. For, just as there are various members belonging
to one and the same body, as St. Paul says, so and in like manner there are
various persons in the one Church, in the order in which placed each of them.
Hence in interpreting this saying of the Apostle’s (in his Homily concerning due
order in discussions) he says that one person in the Church must be an ear,
another a tongue, another a hand, and another some other member; and neither
must all of them be a tongue, or, in other words, teachers, nor must all of them
be Apostles, nor all of them Prophets. So, O man, being a sheep, why are you
trying to make yourself out to be a shepherd? Being a foot, why are you trying
to be a head? Being a soldier, why are you undertaking to be a general? or a
leader of soldiers? Solomon, too, says: “Be not glib of speech and ready to say
things; nor, when poor, quarrel with the rich; nor seek to become wiser than the
wise, or more learned than the learned.” If anyone does things in violation of
this Canon, let him be excommunicated for forty days. But if any layman chance
to be experienced in discourse and modest in manner, he is not prohibited from
answering and teaching in private those asking questions, as Zonaras states, and
ch. 32 of Book VIII of the Apostolic Injunctions declare. For they shall be, it
says, all taught of God: in which manner Apollos spoke, and taught the facts
about the Lord, and in spite of the fact that he only knew the baptism of the
Lord (Acts 28:25), and Aquilas and Priscilla, who taught the same Apollos the
way of God more exactly.

Canon LXV.

We command that henceforth the bonfires lit by some persons on the occasion
of the New Moon in front of their own workshops or houses, and over which some
persons even leap, in accordance with an ancient custom, it is babled, shall be
abolished and done away with. Whoever, therefore, who does any such thing, if he
be a Clergyman, let him be deposed from office; but if he be a layman, let him
be excommunicated. For it is written in the Fourth Book of Kings: “And
Manasseh built an altar to the whole host of heaven, in the two courts of the
Lord’s house, and passed his children through fire, and consulted augurs, and
appointed ventriloquists, and multiplied seers, and he wrought much wickedness
in the sight of the Lord, to provoke him to wrath” (II Kings 23:4–6).

Interpretation.

Since, and in imitation of the Greeks and heathen, some Christians used to
light a bonfire in front of their workshops and houses, over which bonfire they
would leap and pass over it and above it, this Council deposes any clergymen
that do such a thing, while, in the same connection, it excommunicates laymen
guilty of the same offense. Wishing to show that if such Greek customs when
observed by the imperfect Jews sufficed to provoke God to indignation and wrath,
how much more they provoke Him when observed by us Christians who are perfect
and disciples of the Gospel! It says that King Manasseh built an altar, implying
that he offered sacrifices to the host and force of heaven, to the stars, that
is to say (and especially to the moon; just as is written in Jeremiah: “to burn
incense unto the queen of heaven, and to pour out libations unto her” — unto the
moon, that is to say) within the two courts of the temple, and he passed his
children through the fire, and consulted augurs, and was wont to divine future
events by auspication, and appointed many ventriloquists and seers. And he
perpetrated wickedness in the eyes of the Lord and provoked His wrath. Note,
too, that the expression “he passed his children through fire” is taken by the
Council here to mean that Manasseh made his children hop over or through the
fire, whereas Cyril of Alexandria, in his Commentary of Isaiah, interpreted it
to mean that he made a burnt-offering of his children in the fire as a sacrifice
to the demons.

Canon LXVI.

The faithful are required to spend the time in a state of leisure without
fail in the holy churches from the holy days of resurrected Christ our God to
New Sunday in psalms and hymns, and in spiritual songs called odes, while taking
cheer in Christ and celebrating, and paying close attention to the reading of
the divine Scriptures, and delighting themselves to their heart’s content in the
Holy Mysteries. For thus shall we be jointly resurrected and jointly exalted
with Christ. Therefore during the days in question let no horse races or other
popular spectacle be held at all.

Interpretation.

Inasmuch as all of Novation week is reckoned as a single day devoted to the
name of the Lord, therefore does the present Canon decree that all Christians
during this week ought to remain in the churches, taking cheer and celebrating
the Resurrection of the Lord with psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, paying
attention to the words of the divine Scriptures and partaking of the divine
Mysteries. For in this sort of way we shall be resurrected and exalted jointly
together with Christ. Hence on these days horse racing must not be indulged in,
nor must any other popular spectacle, disorderly game, that is to say, or
dances, or wrestling matches, and any other such amusement. See also Ap. c. IX
and c. XXIV of this 6th.

Canon LXVII.

Divine Scripture has commanded us to “abstain from blood, and strangled
flesh, and fornication” (Gen. 9:3–4; Lev. ch. 17 and 18:13; Acts 15:28–29). We
therefore suitably penance those who on account of their dainty stomach eat the
blood of any animal after they have rendered it eatable by some art. If,
therefore, anyone from now on should attempt to eat the blood of any animal, in
any way whatsoever, if he be a clergyman, let him be deposed from office; but if
he be a layman let him be excommunicated.

Interpretation.

The present Canon commands that no Christian eat the blood of any animal, no
matter in what manner or by what art it may have been prepared, and even though
it be mixed with other foods, whether these be “suntzukia” or any other things.
For the divine Scripture of the Old Testament, and especially that of the New
expressly commanded Christians to abstain from blood, from strangled meats, and
from fornication (and from things sacrificed to idols). If a clergyman should
eat this, let him be deposed from office; but if a layman do so, let him be
excommunicated. Read also Ap. c. LXIII.

Canon LXVIII.

As regards the fact that it is not permissible for anyone to destroy, or to
cut up, or to turn over to book stores or to so-called druggists, or anyone else
whatsoever for destruction any of all the books of the Old and New Testaments,
or of our holy and eminent Preachers and Teachers, unless it be completely
useless because of having been damaged by bookworms or water or in some other
way. Anyone caught doing such a thing from now on, let him be excommunicated for
a year. Likewise anyone buying such books, unless he keeps them for his own use
and benefit, nor should he give them away to others to keep, but who attempts to
destroy them, let him be excommunicated.

Interpretation.

It is not permissible, says the present Canon, for anyone to destroy or to
cut up books of the Old and New Testaments, and of the eminent teachers, or, in
other words, of those who have been approved and accepted after tests (for many
books have been written, but have been rejected and disapproved); nor must he
give these away to book stores, or to persons who extinguish or otherwise
destroy books, or to those selling drugs and perfumes, or to anyone else to
destroy or make away with them — except only if they have been entirely eaten up
by worms, or have rotted and have become illegible from having become too old to
be read. As for anyone who might do such a thing, let him be excommunicated for
a year. Likewise let him be excommunicated who buys such books, not in order to
benefit himself by reading them, nor in order to give them to anyone else to
have the benefit of them, but in order to spoil them or to destroy
them.

Canon LXIX.

Let it not be permitted to anyone among all the laity to enter within the
sacred altar, with the exception that the Imperial power and authority is in no
way or manner excluded therefrom whenever it wishes to offer gifts to the
Creator, in accordance with a certain most ancient tradition.

Interpretation.

The holy Bema is consecrated to those in holy orders. For this reason the
present Canon prohibits every layman from entering it, except only that person
who is the Emperor or King; and he is excepted not as a layman, but as having
power and authority and as one anointed of the Lord, who has been permitted to
enter it, in accordance with a most ancient tradition, whenever he wishes to
offer gifts to God his Creator, and to partake of the Holy Mysteries.

Canon LXX.

Let it not be permissible for women to talk during Holy Mass, but in
accordance with the words of Paul the Apostle, “let your women remain silent.
For it has not been permitted them to talk, but to obey, as the law directs. If
they wish to learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home.”

“As in all churches of the saints,” says Paul the Apostle, “in the
churches let your women remain silent. For it has not been permitted them to
talk but to obey, as the law directs. If they wish to learn anything, let them
ask their husbands at home” (1 Cor. 14:33–35.)

“Let the women learn quietly with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman
to teach, nor to exercise authority over a man, but to be quiet. For Adam was
formed first, and then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman having been
deceived became at fault. But she shall be saved through child-bearing, if they
abide in faith and love and sanctity with sobriety” (1 Tim. 2:11–15).

Interpretation.

According to the words of this Canon and according to the words of St. Paul,
women are prohibited from teaching either in holy temples (churches) or outside
thereof, for St. Paul does not mean by “church” the temple itself, but a
“congregation of people” anywhere; and still more are they prohibited from
chanting either in a choir of their own or along with men.

“For it is a shame for women to talk in church” (1 Cor. 14:35). This
means that women should keep silent in church, and out of church wherever there
is a congregation of people. The fact that the word talk is used here,
and not the word speak, controverts and overthrows the allegation put forward by
some persons that only teaching is forbidden to women but not chanting; for talk
includes any sort of vocal utterance, and not merely articulate speech. In fact,
women are not allowed to let their voice be heard at all within the sacred
temple of the church. They may, of course, sing and chant in their hearts
praises and blessings to God, but not with their lips.

Before God formed Eve, He said: “It is not good that man should be alone;
let us make for him a helper meet for him” (Gen. 2:18). This means that
woman was created, not to rule man, but to help him and to be ruled by him.
Woman is a teacher of every virtue by word and deed within her own province at
home; but she is not allowed even to speak or sing within the sacred precincts
of the church. Woman’s job is to bear children and rear them in the belief and
love of God, to uphold the sanctity and sobriety of marriage, and to shun
adultery as a thing that is odious to God. By so doing she will be saved, and
not otherwise; by leaving this path and failing in these duties, she invites
perdition.

“If anyone think himself a prophet or a spiritual agent, let him
acknowledge that what I write unto you are commandments of the Lord. But if
anyone is ignorant, let him be ignorant” (1 Cor. 14:37–38). A true prophet
or teacher or spiritual agent has the spirit of Christ and does not disagree
with Christ’s Apostle; he easily discerns and believes that St. Paul’s
commandments are commandments of Christ. Whoever, on the other hand, does not
discern and believe this, yet thinks that he is a prophet or a spiritual agent,
is merely deluding himself; he is a false prophet lacking the spirit of Christ.

Teaching and chanting are inconsistent with the nature and destiny of a
Christian woman, just as are the priesthood and the bishopric. Eve, the woman
formed by God, was the first to teach Adam once, in Paradise, and she ruined
everything; that is why women are forbidden to talk in churches. The greatest
adornment of women is silence. Let their example be Mary, the New Woman and
Child of God, who alone has the honor of having had her speech recorded in
history and handed down in the ninth ode of the Church; this refers to her
speech and that of Elizabeth. Therefore let Christian women emulate her. The
ancient idolaters had priestesses to officiate at the altars and in the temples
of idols, in which demons were worshiped; and hence it is that deluded heretics
derived this impious custom of theirs of letting women teach and sing and govern
in their churches. Shall we Orthodox Christians imitate them? By no means!

It is recorded in the Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius (Book 7, ch.
30) that a council of bishops met in Antioch in the third century after Christ
from various cities for the purpose of trying Paul the bishop of Samosat, who
was rather a sophist and magician than a bishop and who, in addition to other
heresies, had introduced a choir of women into the church of Antioch. That
council addressed a letter to bishops Dionysius of Rome and Maximus of
Alexandria containing the following phrases: “Having suppressed the psalms to
our Lord Jesus Christ on the pretext that they are modern psalms and the
writings of modern men, who is preparing women to chant to himself in the midst
of the church on the great day of Easter whom one would shudder merely to
listen to.”

Women were never permitted to teach or to chant in the church along with the
sacred cantors or in a choir of their own. Female choirs are an unexampled
innovation involving many perils and capable of leading to many scandals, for
woman’s voice is more attractive and more pathetic than man’s. The appearance of
women in the church choir constitutes a stumbling block; for the eyes and ears
of the congregation are at once turned to them, and, becoming intoxicated with
the sight and sound of the highstrung melodramatic voices of women, they are
languorously effeminated in mind and rendered incapable of enjoying the modest
and contrite songs of the Church; thus the church choir gradually becomes
transformed into a theatrical chorus!

Canon LXXV of the Sixth Ecumenical Synod decrees the following with reference
to church choirs: “It is our wish that those who come to church to chant should
neither employ disorderly yelling and strain their natural voices to scream, nor
recite anything inappropriate and not suited to a church, but that they should
offer such psalmodies with great care contrition to God, who listens and looks
on in secret.” “The children of Israel shall be reverent,” saith the
sacred saying (Lev. 15:31).

The holy liturgy and sacred hymnody presented in church has the purpose of
offering prayers to propitiate God for our sins. Whoever prays and supplicates
should be of humble and contrite mind; yelling indicates rudeness and
irreverence of mind. But voices and faces of female choirs and the psalmody of
European quartets represent a theatrical mind rather than a modest
ecclesiastical mind. What is it that is unsuited to the church? Effeminate songs
(melodies) and trills (which means the same thing as the warbles of old) and an
excessive variety of tones that inclines to whorish songs, Zonaras, an
interpreter of the Canons, says.

The children of Israel after Christ are the pious Christians, who should be
imbued with fear of God and reverence while within the church. God is not
pleased with variety of melodies and voices, but with contrition and repentance
of the heart. This is easily understood when we remember that man is pleased to
listen to melodies and to look at pretty faces, whereas God looks into man’s
soul in the depths of the heart and delights in its reverence, which is
manifested by humbleness of behavior.

Canon LXXI.

Those being taught the civil laws (i.e., civil law) must not resort to the
Greek customs, nor moreover must they appear upon the theater stage, or engage
in so-called cylistrae, or garb themselves in robes not in common use,
either at the time they are commencing their course of study, or at the time
they are finishing it, or, to speak more generally, at any time in the midst of
their education. From now on if anyone dare to do so, let him be excommunicated.

Interpretation.

Just as the more foolish of the learned men among the Athenians used to fight
with their adversaries, as St. Gregory the Theologian writes in the epitaph of
St. Basil the Great, and block up the cities and streets, and to do other such
things usual to the young sophists, in like manner were Christians who were
being taught civil law wont to adopt these Greek customs, and would let
themselves be judged on the stage as to who was the best of them in
argumentation, and would engage in what were called cylistrae, or would don
clothes out of the ordinary. The present Canon prohibits them from doing any of
those things either at the commencement or in the midst or at the end of their
law course. Anyone doing such things thereafter is to be excommunicated.

Canon LXXII.

Let no Orthodox man be allowed to contract a marriage with a heretical woman,
nor moreover let any Orthodox woman be married to a heretical man. But if it
should be discovered that any such thing is done by any one of the Christians,
no matter who, let the marriage be deemed void, and let the lawless marriage tie
be dissolved. For it is not right to mix things immiscible, nor to let a wolf
get tangled up with a sheep, and the lot of sinners get tangled up with the
portion of Christ. If, therefore, anyone violates the rules we have made let him
be excommunicated. But in case persons who happen to be still in the state of
unbelief (i.e., infidels) and to be not yet admitted to the fold of the Orthodox
have joined themselves to each other by lawful marriage, then and in that event,
the one of them having chosen the good start by running to the light of truth,
while the other, on the contrary, has been held down by the bond of delusion for
having failed to welcome the choice of gazing at the divine rays (whether it be
that an infidel woman has looked with favor upon a man who is a believer, or
vice versa an infidel man upon a woman who is a believer), let them not be
separated, in accordance with the divine Apostle: “For the infidel husband is
sanctified by the wife, and the infidel wife by the husband” (1 Cor. 7:14).

(c. XIV of the 4th.)

Interpretation.

The present Canon declares that it is not permissible for an Orthodox man to
marry a heretical woman, or for an Orthodox woman to get married to a heretical
man. But if anyone should do this, the marriage is to be void, and this unlawful
matrimonial tie is to be sundered. For no wolf should ever be united with a
sheep, and the lot of sinners and heretics with the portion of Christ and of
Orthodox Christians. Whoever transgresses the present Canon, let him be
excommunicated. If, however, both parties were married while infidels in
infidelity and community of religion, but afterwards one party believed in
Christ, while the other remained in the darkness of infidelity, though the
infidel party is still pleased to cohabit with the believing party, let the
couple not be separated, as St. Paul says, and indeed even St. Basil’s c. IX.
For one thing, because the infidel husband becomes sanctified by living with his
believing wife, or the infidel wife by living with her believing husband. And
for another thing, because perhaps as a result of such cohabitation the other
party may be led to piety. “For what knowest thou, O wife, whether thou shalt
save thy husband?” demands the same St. Paul, “or how knowest thou, O
husband, whether thou shalt save they wife?” (1 Cor. 7:16). See also c. XIV
of the 4th.

Canon LXXIII.

Seeing that the vivifying Cross has shown us the way to Salvation, we ought
to make every endeavour to render the honor deserved to that which has been the
means whereby we have been saved from the old lapse. Hence both in mind and in
word and in sentiment paying it adoration, we by all means command that imprints
of the Cross on the ground made by some persons be erased, lest the symbol
signifying the trophy of victory to us be desecrated by being trodden upon by
people walking over the ground. We therefore decree that henceforth those who
make the sign or imprint of the Cross upon the ground shall be excommunicated.

Interpretation.

By virtue of the vivifying Cross we have been saved[209] and have been freed
from the bondage of sin. Hence (says the present Canon) we ought to make
endeavour to render due honor and adoration to it, both with the mind, by
remembering how many good things we have gained through it; and with words by
telling these things to others and thanking Christ who was crucified upon it;
and with feeling by kissing and honoring it wherever we see it. But inasmuch as
certain simple-minded people mark the figure of this precious Cross everywhere,
so far even as upon the ground of the earth, under the pretext of supposed
reverence and in order to pay more honor to it, on this account the Council
commands that wherever the figure of the Cross be found printed upon the ground
it shall be erased and spoiled in order to prevent its being trodden underfoot
and consequently dishonored by people walking upon the victorious trophy of our
salvation. As for all those who hereafter make the figure of the Cross upon the
ground, let them be excommunicated.

Canon LXXIV.

That so-called agapae, or love-feasts, must not be held at the Lord’s
suppers, or at the churches, and that one is not to eat them inside of a house,
or to lay a table with accubita (or couches). As for those who dare to do this,
let them either cease or be excommunicated.

Interpretation.

The present Canon is word for word the same as c. XXVIII of Laodicea, which
prohibits Christian people from holding agapae, or so-called love-feasts (i.e.,
banquets held as a token of love, and designed to lead the banqueters to love
and union), on the occasion of the Lord’s suppers, or, as we may say, in the
churches. Nor must they provide soft and high couches thereat, which it calls
“accubita,” using a Latin word derived from the verb accumbo, which means
in Latin to lean or recline upon, and thus to sit at table; for Christians were
wont to sit on these when eating. As for any persons that might dare to do this,
they must either cease or be excommunicated. We must first note that Balsamon
opines that by “Lord’s suppers” the Canon means here any place dedicated to the
Lord, including, that is to say, both the Narthex and the Pronaos, reserving the
word “church” for the Temple itself. Hence the particle “or” is not to be taken
as explanatory, as Zonaras asserts, but as disjunctive: so that, according to
him, one must not eat, not only in churches, but not even in the Narthex of
churches.

Canon LXXV.

We wish those who attend church for the purpose of chanting neither to employ
disorderly cries and to force nature to cry out aloud, nor to foist in anything
that is not becoming and proper to a church; but, on the contrary, to offer such
psalmodies with much attentiveness and con-triteness to God, who sees directly
into everything that is hidden from our sight. “For the sons of Israel shall
be reverent” (Lev. 15:30), the sacred word has taught us.

Interpretation.

The chanting, or psalmody, that is done in churches is in the nature of
begging God to be appeased for our sins. Whoever begs and prayerfully
supplicates must have a humble and contrite manner; but to cry out manifests a
manner that is audacious and irreverent. On this account the present Canon
commands that those who chant in the churches refrain from forcing their nature
to yell, but also from saying anything else that is unsuitable for the church.
But what are the things that are unsuitable for the church? The expositor
Zonaras replies that they are womanish members and warblings (which is the same
as saying trills, and an excessive variation or modulation in melodies which
inclines towards the songs sung by harlots). The present Canon, therefore,
commands that all these things be eliminated from the Church, and that those
chant therein shall offer their psalmodies with great care to God, who looks
into the hidden recesses of the heart, i.e., into the psalmody and prayer that
are framed mentally in the heart rather than uttered in external cries. For the
sacred word of Leviticus teaches us sons of Israel to be reverent to
God.

Canon LXXVI.

That within the sacred precincts no tavern or showcase for the display of
perfumes or of other kinds of merchandise must be set up; for the respectability
of the Church must be preserved, seeing that our Savior and God, instructing us
by His conduct while living in the flesh, bade us not to make His Father’s house
a house of merchandise (John 2:16). He even poured out the coins of the
money-changers, and drove them all out of the temple who were making it a market
place. If, therefore, anybody be caught in doing what is here prohibited, let
him be excommunicated.

Interpretation.

The Lord told the Jews (19:46): “It is written, ‘My house shall be called
a house of prayer’ (Isa. 56:7); but ye have made it a ‘robbers’ cave”
(Jer. 7:11). Hence, in order to avoid having these fearful words said to the
faithful, the Fathers prohibited by means of this Canon the establishment of a
tavern, or, in other words, the sale of wine, or of raki, or even of other kinds
of comestibles, according to Zonaras, or of perfumes, according to Balsamon or
of other kinds of merchandise within the sacred precincts, or, in other words,
within the confines of the vestibule and the grounds of the divine Temples and
Churches, in order to keep up respect for them. For even the Lord admonished us
and said for us not to make the house of his Father a house of merchandise, and
He even dumped out the money of the money-changers, or, more explicitly
speaking, he scattered their small coins; and turning upon those who were making
the temple a common house, he drove them away with a scourge of cords. As for
anyone that may do this, let him be excommunicated. Read also c. LXXIV for the
same 6th.

Canon LXXVII.

That those who have been admitted to the priesthood, or clerics, or ascetics
ought not to bathe in public baths with women, nor ought any Christian layman do
so. For this is the first thing heathen find to condemn. In case, however,
anyone be caught in the act of committing this impropriety, if he is a
clergyman, let him be deposed from office; but if he is a layman, let him be
excommunicated.

Interpretation.

The present Canon is word for word c. XXX of the Council held in Laodicea,
except only for the penance. It says, then, that those in major holy orders, or
clergymen admitted to the Holy Bema, or monks and ascetics, or in general any
Christian layman ought not to bathe in a public bath together with women; since
this impropriety in the eyes of heathen appears to be an offense of the first
magnitude, and the greatest scandal as against Christians. But the Apostle
commands us to become sentinels to the Jews and Greeks, and to the Church of God
(1 Cor. 10:32). And if, as Zonaras says, merely meeting a woman in general on
the street or at a house is enough to disturb the reasoning process, how can the
mind of those men who are bathing together with women fail to be overwhelmed and
moved to desire. But not even married couples ought to bathe together, according
to Balsamon, either at a public bath, that is to say, or in the sea, or in a
river. For they possess their bodies for the purpose of procreating children,
and not in order to strip themselves and look at their ugly parts. The Canon
adds that whoever appears to be doing this, if he is a clergyman, let him be
deposed from office; but if he is a layman, let him be
excommunicated.

Canon LXXVIII.

That those being enlightened (through baptism) must learn all about the
faith, and on every Thursday must recite to the Bishop or to the Presbyter.

Interpretation.

This Canon too is likewise word for word c. XLVI of Laodicea, which says that
those who are getting prepared for enlightenment and baptism as catechumens (see
the Interpretation of c. XIV of the 1st) ought throughout the period of their
catechization (but what was the length of this period? See the Footnote to c. II
of the 1st) to learn the dogmas of the Orthodox faith well and on Thursday of
each week, according to Zonaras, they have to recite them by heart to the
bishop, or to the presbyters who are catechizing them, lest, being ignorant of
the mystery involved in our religion, they be baptized, and lest, being without
supporting knowledge as a result of their ignorance, they be easily deceived by
heretics.

Canon LXXXIX.

Confessing the divine childbirth to have resulted from the Virgin without
confinement (i.e., childbed), as well as without its being induced by seed; and
preaching to all the flock, we require those who have done anything that was not
proper to submit to correction. Hence, in view of the fact that after the holy
birthday of Christ our God some persons are shown to be boiling fine flour
(called in Greek semidalis) and giving thereof to one another, on the
pretext of paying honor to the alleged puerperium of the All-intemerate
Parthenometor (i.e., the perfectly immaculate Virgin Mother), we decree that
nothing of the kind shall be done by the faithful. For this is no honor to the
Virgin, at any rate, who gave birth to the Logos in the flesh who is incapable
of being spatially bounded and whose birth was beyond the mind and reason of
man, from common knowledge and our own experience to define and subscribe to the
events attending Her ineffable childbirth. Henceforth, therefore, in case anyone
should be caught in the act of doing this, if he be a cleric, let him be deposed
from office; but if he be a layman, let him be excommunicated.

Interpretation.

Inasmuch as some Christians, actuated by their lack of positive knowledge, on
the second day after Christmas boiled fine flour and other foodstuffs, which
they ate and gave one another to eat, doing this for the sake of allegedly
honoring the puerperium of the Theotokos (just as it is the custom to do in the
case of other women who gave birth to children in a natural manner). On this
account and for this reason the present Canon decrees that hereafter such a
thing shall not be done by Christians. For by such a custom to liken the
inexplicable childbirth of the Ever-Virgin to the common and humble birth of us
human beings cannot be considered any honor to Her, who beyond the
conceivability of man’s mind and reason gave birth in the flesh to the God
Logos, who cannot be bounded spatially; on the contrary, it is rather a
dishonor. For just as we confess the Conception of the Theotokos to have been
seedless and to have resulted from action of the Holy Spirit, so and in like
manner we also join in confessing Her childbirth to have been one above every
accompaniment of any confinement due to what is commonly called childbed, which
consists in giving birth to an infant with the accompanying pangs of childbirth
and is followed by a flux of blood, according to Zonaras.[218] Whoever should do
this, if he be a Cleric, let him be deposed from office; but if he be a layman,
let him be excommunicated.

Canon LXXX.

In case any Bishop, or Presbyter, or Deacon, or anyone else on the list of
the Clergy, or any layman, without any graver necessity or any particular
difficulty compelling him to absent himself from his own church for a very long
time, fails to attend church on Sundays for three consecutive weeks, while
living in the city, if he be a Cleric, let him be deposed from office; but if he
be a layman, let him be removed from Communion.

Interpretation.

The present Canon decrees that any bishop, presbyter, or deacon, or any
clergyman in general, or any layman, without being under any grave necessity or
difficulty forcing him to stay away from his church, while he is living in the
city, fails to attend church along with the rest of the faithful on three
consecutive Sundays, if he be a clergyman, let him be deposed from office; but
if he be a layman, let him be excommunicated. For one of two things must be
true: either such a person is not a believer; or, though a believer, he scorns
the common offering of hymns and prayers to God.