Monday, September 19, 2016

A Stew Pot of Notable News

You can tolerate a little rape, can't you? Start tolerance!

I could not pass this up. It is one
of the dumbest, most politically correct, and insulting pro-immigration ads
that has passed my desk. It
has appeared on German TV. Paul Joseph Watson reports on Infowars:

A television ad currently
airing in Germany invites blonde-haired, blue-eyed women to embrace “tolerance”
by wearing the Muslim hijab head dress.

The commercial begins with the text “Turkish women wear the
hijab,” as a veiled woman is seen with her back to the camera.

However, when she turns around it immediately becomes clear
that the woman is a white, blonde-haired German, before she states, “Me too!
It’s beautiful!”

“Enjoy difference – start tolerance,” states the woman.

The campaign is
funded by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization,
as well as German taxpayers, who are forced to obtain a state television
license or face prison time.

Instead of reversing its suicidal
immigration policy, it appears as though Germany is now encouraging its female
population to avoid the mass sex
assaults committed by Muslim migrants in numerous major cities by
submitting to Islam and covering themselves up.

The
outfit worn by the model is about as Sharia compliant as a Halloween gypsy
costume you might see at a college sorority party. Frankly, it is quite
fetching.It is distinctly not Turkish or any style resembling
approved Islamic norms. The woman is not
wearing a hair-covering hijab. It is definitely an invitation to rape, as she
is decidedly “uncovered meat,” to judge by Sharia measures of “modesty.”

If any woman appeared in Germany (or in
France, or in Sweden, or in any Muslim conquered
or invaded Continental country) in that kind of outfit she would be immediately
surrounded by Muslim men, groped, and thrown to the ground and given the Lara
Logan Cairo treatment. The costume would be ripped from her body. Then she
could “enjoy the difference” and do her bit in “enjoying tolerance.” Right? If
she complained, she could be punished by Merkel’s tolerance police and accused
of “racism” or “Islamophobia.” “You did not start tolerance!” they’d shout.

You
have to ask yourself what possessed the minds of the producers of the ad to
turn out such a putrid piece of propaganda. Well, it could not have been
sanity. Speaking of Turkish dress, Turks in Germany are especially brutal as
they like to disfigure their European victims after the gang rapes. I’ve only
seen Turkish belly dancers so attired in movies.

Please
note that it is not Muslims or any of those Muslim male adult “refugees” who
are being asked to “start tolerance,” although they may, as criminals, “enjoy
the difference” in the act of sexual assault. It is German women who are being
urged to submit to Islam by voluntarily covering themselves up and staying out
of sight. I would be as welcome to an Obama or Hillary Clinton rally dressed as
Uncle Sam or sporting a “Make America Great Again” cap. A German woman would stand
a similar chance of non-molestation in any Muslim “no-go” neighborhood. I’d be
beaten up by #Never Trump morons and social justice warrior thugs.

On
another front, “refugee” champion George Clooney, who owns about a dozen
million-dollar mansions around the world, including at Lake Como, Italy, is
reluctant to allow migrants anywhere near that personal refuge from reality. As
with other members of the establishment “elite,” Clooney wishes to insulate himself
from the destructive consequences of his policies. Dealing with the rapes,
robberies, and other culturally “enriching” habits of savages is not for him,
just for the hoi polloi, otherwise
known as the “deplorables.” Hillary Clinton unintentionally handed Donald Trump
the perfect meme by calling his supporters “a basket case of deplorables.”

Flimsy dwellings, clothes and trash are scattered
around the Northern Italian town’s railway station, where dozens of new
families and refugees have flocked….

The migrant camp
is, oddly enough, just steps away from the front door of
immigration activists’ George and Amal Clooney’s multi-million
dollar lakeside mansion in Lake Como, according to the Daily Mail.

The couple was
recently pictured drinking tequila while watching fireworks on
a boat near the property alongside their close friend Bill Murray.

The Clooneys have
taken refuge from the Hollywood spotlight in their summer home in Italy for
years. Last year, Page Sixreported that Clooney was mulling putting his Lake
Como villa on the market due to ever-present and intrusive paparazzi.

It is unclear if
the recent deluge of refugees pouring into town will have an affect on
Clooney’s decision to sell or not.

The
power couple has spent some time talking about the migrant crisis. The Clooneys met privately with German Chancellor Angela Merkel in
February and praised and thanked her for her leadership during the crisis….

George has
previously described Trump as a “xenophobic fascist” who wants to “ban Muslims from the
country.”

I
guess Clooney is hoping we don’t label him as a “xenophobic fascist,” as well, for
thinking about selling his Lake Como mansion to put some distance between him
and his adopted “children.” No, we won’t call him that. Instead, we’ll call him
a hypocritical pull-peddler and social justice warrior who is reluctant to rub
shoulders with the “refugees” or risk having Amal groped or worse by other
culture “enrichers.”

Amal Clooney, the
British-Lebanese human rights attorney who married George in 2014, slammed Republican presumptive presidential nominee Donald
Trump this past April, saying his immigration stance and promise to build a
wall on the Mexican border do not represent “U.S. values.”

George and Amal know
as much about “U.S. values” as I do about phrenology or dialectical materialism.

We, the MSM, don't need no stinkin' objectivity!

That
also goes for the MSM. It has abandoned all pretense of reporting any news concerning
Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton and adopted a “what we say goes” philosophy of
slander and puffery. It may not pass as “truth,” but who’s to say what truth
is? It’s whatever we want it to be, and if you don’t believe it then you’re a
racist, xenophobic, anti-Islam pig. Never mind that Hillary is sodden with
corruption, chargeable felonious offenses, and treason, we, the MSM, believe
she knows all about “U.S. values” and we want this beast to sit in the White
House and guide this country to the oblivion it so richly deserves, to continue
the destruction implemented by Barack Obama. We stick our tongues out at
objectivity and truth.

This
transparent bias is a national phenomenon, infecting both print and television
media to such an extent that it has become almost impossible to separate
coverage of the Trump campaign from attempts to tear it down. The media has
long been accused of having a liberal slant, but in this cycle journalists seem
to have cast themselves as defenders of the republic against what they see as a
major threat, and in playing this role they’ve lost the ability to assess
events rationally….

To
take a recent example: Trump said at a news conference that he hoped the
Russians — who are accused of hacking the Democratic National Committee’s
computers — would release the 30,000 emails previously erased by Clinton’s
staff. The DNC went ballistic, claiming that Trump had asked the Russians to
commit “espionage” against the United States. Aside from the fact that Trump
was obviously joking, Clinton claims those emails, which were on her
unauthorized server during her tenure as secretary of State, were about her
yoga lessons and personal notes to her husband — so how would revealing
them endanger “national security”? Yet the media reported this accusation uncritically.
A New York Times piece by Maggie Haberman and Ashley Parker, ostensibly
reporting Trump’s contention that he spoke in jest, nonetheless averred that
“the Republican nominee basically urged Russia, an adversary, to conduct
cyber-espionage against a former secretary of state.” Would it be a stretch to
conclude from this description that the New York Times is a Trump adversary?

Polls
shows that journalism is one of the least respected professions in the country,
and with Trump calling out media organizations for their bias, widespread
slanted reporting is bound to reinforce this point — and to backfire.
Trump’s campaign is throwing down the gauntlet to the political class. If
journalists are seen as the mouthpiece of that class, they may soon find themselves
covering Trump’s inauguration.

Raimondo
concludes that his local newspaper, the Sonoma County Press-Democrat, “is clearly in the tank for Hillary Clinton,” and
that can be said as well for the rest of the MSM.

Sheep that could not recite the Shahada, had its throat cut.

In
the meantime, Barack Obama wants us all to “enjoy the difference” and help Muslims
in America celebrate Eid
al-Adha, the “holiday” when Muslims butcher animals by slitting their
throats and letting them bleed to death in agony. It’s a religion, don’t you
see? It’s halal. It’s culturally “enriching.”

“We
are reminded of the millions of refugees around the globe who are spending this
sacred holiday separated from their families, unsure of their future, but still
hoping for a brighter tomorrow,” Mr. Obama said in a statement. “And as a
nation, we remain committed to welcoming the stranger with empathy and an open
heart — from the refugee who flees war-torn lands to the immigrant who leaves
home in search of a better life.”

Eid al-Adha, also
known as the Festival of the Sacrifice, began Sunday night and ends Thursday
night.

I
wonder who really wrote that. Angela Merkel? George Clooney? Hillary Clinton?
Loretta Lynch? You see, there is no difference between halal butchery of animals and what ISIS and other Islamic Justice
Warriors have done to or wish to do to all Jews and infidels: slit their
throats and let them bleed to death.

Remember how the stewardesses and pilots
of the 9/11 planes died with those boxcutters? That’s halal.