Monday, September 15, 2008

The fabrication of the NSLU ruling by FBI HQ Agent Dina Corsi

When FBI HQ Agent Dina Corsi told FBI Agent Steve Bongardt he could not be part of any investigation of Mihdhar, he asked if she could obtain a ruling from the legal department at the FBI NSLU unit. But evidence now shows that Corsi fabricated the ruling she relayed to Bongardt on August 29, 2001. The NSLU Attorney, Sherry Sabol, who gave Corsi the ruling, later told FBI IG investigators on November 7, 2001, that she told Corsi that Bongardt could take part in any investigation of Mihdhar, because the NSA information had no FISA component, and that if Corsi was confused, Corsi herself could have obtained a release directly from the NSA (Sabol was unaware that the NSLU had given Corsi this release two days before, and that Corsi had not revealed this informatuion when she had asked Sabol for a NSLU ruling on whether Bongardt could take part in an investigation of Mihdhar.)

About Me

Prior Knowledge of 9/11 details how a businessman had become aware of the upcoming events of 9-11 in February 2001, while on a business trip to New York.
This book describes how the events of 9/11 had been uncovered seven months prior to the actual event, and why even with this detailed knowledge, there was no way to stop the attack. The book also details the two official investigations of 9/11, and poses the question why the FBI and CIA were not able to uncover this plan of 9/11, when they had significantly more in-depth information than a businessman from Palo Alto. (See Book reviews, Prior Knowledge of 9/11).