The attached image shows a "pocket rifle" made in the 1870s. It is a single shot with a 12 inch barrel and removable stock. Is this a simple "antique", that can be bought and owned with no FFL or other legal processes? Or do special legal requirements apply to something like this? I am asking about federal law; my state is relatively open for such things.

Very true. I had a friend convicted (he was sentenced Tuesday) for having a short rifle in violation of NFA. This came even though, in court, it was proven the gun was made before the NFA went into effect and it was supposedly therefore exempt. It was his military survival rifle, he was special ops and it was given to him on his retirement after 34 years service.
Don't say "they can't do that". They did do that.
Be careful out there.

This came even though, in court, it was proven the gun was made before the NFA went into effect and it was supposedly therefore exempt... Don't say "they can't do that". They did do that.

+1. I would recommend reposting this thread on the "NFA Guns & Gear" subforum and asking how this gun's potential NFA status affects its transferability.

I will admit that I am largely ignorant regarding NFA regulations, but my basic understanding is that the gun could be exempt IF it is all-original. The problem is the big fat "IF".

Reread what I wrote earlier about burden of proof. Let it sink in. Mull it over for a little while. Do you know the gun is pre-1899 and all-original? How? What do you really know about the gun's provenance, and can you prove it beyond a reasonable doubt?

This would not be nearly as thorny of an issue without the potential NFA question. When it comes to NFA items, the Feds don't play around.

__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak

__________________
NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, Home Firearms Safety, Pistol and Rifle Instructor"There are three classes of people: those who see, those who see when they are shown, those who do not see."
Leonardo da Vinci

There are no special requirements under federal law. All firearms made before 1/1/1899 are legal antiques, period.

NOT TRUE! While it may be true for firearms regulated under the Gun Control Act, it is not true for those firearms regulated under the National Firearms Act. There are two different legal definitions of an antique firearm in the two acts. The primary difference is in how the firearm using fixed cartridges affects the definition.

Also, the firearm the OP has may no longer be regulated by the NFA. Several models of the Stevens Pocket Rifle have been removed from the NFA and also removed from the GCA as antiques. See Section IIIA of the BATF Firearms Curios or Relics List.

Quote:

SECTION IIIA: Weapons Removed From The NFA As Collector's
Items And Removed From the GCA As Antiques.

The following firearms were removed from the NFA as collector's items and classified as curios or relics under 18 U.S.C.
Chapter 44. However, because they are antiques as defined in Chapter 44, they should not have been classified as curios
or relics. Because they are no longer NFA weapons and are antiques under Chapter 44, they are not subject to GCA
provisions.

Any pistol or revolver, mfd. in or before 1898, originally designed to accept a shoulder stock, and accompanied
by an original shoulder stock.

To further [muddy|clarify] the waters, it's not terribly difficult to petition the ATF to declare a firearm a curio or relic or to have it removed from the NFA. In particular, if you look through the C&R book, you'll see a number of examples of specific Winchester rifles, identified with serial numbers, that were manufactured with short barrels. Normally, they'd be an SBR, regulated by the NFA. All it takes is a request, accompanied by a letter from, say, the curator of a museum attesting to the value of the item as a curio or relic and the ATF can exempt it from the NFA and put it on the C&R list. That's not to say they will, but it's not too tough to ask.

But, as EOD Guy posted, the gun in the OP probably fits the exemption already allowed.

__________________Well we don't rent pigs and I figure it's better to say it right out front because a man that does like to rent pigs is... he's hard to stop - Gus McCrae

This email link is to reach site administrators for assistance, if you cannot access TFL via other means. If you are a TFL member and can access TFL, please do not use this link; instead, use the forums (like Questions, Suggestions, and Tech Support) or PM an appropriate mod or admin.

If you are experiencing difficulties posting in the Buy/Sell/Trade subforums of TFL, please read the "sticky" announcement threads at the top of the applicable subforum. If you still feel you are qualified to post in those subforums, please contact "Shane Tuttle" (the mod for that portion of TFL) via Private Message for assistance.

This email contact address is not an "Ask the Firearms Expert" service. Such emails will be ignored. If you have a firearm related question, please register and post it on the forums.