In opposition to the negative connotations attached to the term, social engineering in economics, this article tries to call attention to the approach to engineering as a paradigm for scientific research, as recommended by S. L. Goldman. Goldman makes clear that methodological controversy in economics around the concept of rationalism may apply to all sciences. The history of economics and the experiences derived from the most recent crisis confirm Goldman's standpoint about the need for change in the approach dominant in Western science. Following the approach adopted in natural sciences and accepting a rationalistic-positivist view of science, orthodox economists have squandered the potential embedded in the methodological approach defended by heterodox economists. In light of the engineering paradigm, neither the scientist nor the engineer face the dilemma described by G. Mankiw. For the macroeconomist applying the engineering paradigm, practical action, the solving of running problems, observation of tangible reality, and the need to take into account concrete targets and values are all valuable elements of research procedure protecting him against modeling isolated from realistic premises. (original abstract)

Callaos N., The Essence of Engineering and Meta-Engineering: A Work in Progress, 2008, http://www.iiis.org/Nagib-Callaos/Engineering-and-Meta-Engineering/Engineering--and-MetaEngineering.pdf (dostęp: wrzesień 2012).