An uncluttered setting that seems to have no purpose but to exist for the presence of this model.
Perfect clarity (on my ipad)
Elegant and classy combined with openly explicit.
A white background without glare or washout.
The dress.
Simplicity and neutrality of color, except for the luxuriously flattering green.
Simplicity and neutrality of texture and design, except for the fancy frame of the sofa (and it's not silver!)
Incredible ass/leg combo posing.
A presentation of la grande bellezza and her little friend as good as anywhere on site.
Whole body shots with the effect of close ups.
Mostly superb framing (rach's objections noted)Perhaps not the best facial expressions of our model. Perhaps she is not entirely comfortable with the temperature.
Perhaps could use the dress more creatively. Some photos with it pulled up and some with it dropping down, with not so many bunched around the middle.
Part of the mons is lost in the lovely 117. (And 121)
The luscious 121 might (I'm just saying might) be improved with a lower camera angle.

Definitely looks like it was a wee bit chilly in that room. Not only were her "headlights" on high-beam (no complaints on THAT from me, lol), you could see her gooseflesh in some of the close-up body shots.

Sandra Lauver is quite a slender, classic, beauty and Rylsky has done her full justice here. I notice in some close-up shots, no 34 for example, that Sandra is having her anus bleached, as well as waxing the undercarriage. I don't think that is necessary, waxing is plenty

Are you faulting the man for voicing his opinion? I thought we ALL paid to get in here...;o) And just because she "may" be bleaching it, doesn't mean that she can't show up "less than immaculate"... In fact if she does, it will be a lot more noticeable if her anus is "bleached"... That "brown eye" should probably remain brown...;o)