Coleman & Horowitt has one of the premier intellectual property and technology law practices in California. The firm provides a wide range of services for the protection of the intellectual property of our clients. We have expertise in technology law, online defamation, defense, and Section 230 matters, start ups, and other issues facing start-ups.

Tuesday, April 17, 2018

California Law That Forbade Posting of Actors’ Ages Struck Down by Federal Court

A federal district court judge has struck down
California’s AB 1687, a law which forbade a popular film industry website from
publishing certain truthful age-related information about actors, finding it in
violation of the First Amendment.

In
2016, IMDb.com, Inc. sued the State of California to challenge the
constitutionality of the law.The Screen
Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists intervened as
a defendant in the suit.The defendants
maintained that the law was necessary to combat rampant age discrimination in
the Hollywood film industry.In its
order granting IMDb.com, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment, the court held
that while curbing age discrimination is certainly a compelling interest,
“regulation of speech must be a last resort.”

One
of the defendants’ contentions was that the publication of facts about ages of
people in the entertainment industry can be banned because these facts
“facilitate” age discrimination.The
court rejected this, noting that such an argument, if successful, “would enable
states to forbid publication of virtually any fact.”Moreover, the United States Supreme Court has
said on multiple occasions that the fact that a third party could misuse
truthful information is almost never sufficient to justify suppression of that
information.

The
court also held that AB 1687 cannot survive strict scrutiny.While the State certainly has a compelling
interest to combat age discrimination, the law was not narrowly tailored to
achieve that interest.For one, the law
was uncerinclusive because it bans only one kind of speaker from disseminating
age-related information, leaving all other sources of that information untouched.The law was also overinclusive because it
requires IMDb not to publish age-information of all those who request that
their information not be published, including those who are not protected by
age discrimination laws.

This
case serves as a reminder that courts cannot and will not protect Americans
from the truth; truthful statements are constitutionally protected.Furthermore, the court’s ruling implies that
the publication of truthful information on a platform that employers can access
is not unlawful, even if an employer uses the information to discriminate.