Cognitive Dissidence, The mechanism of warfare and subversion for intellectual revolutionaries.

Wednesday, 5 August 2009

The Judge That Roared

The role of a Judge in modern Britain is to serve the interests of the government, not the interests of Justice.

Most judges are arse licking, career chasing, pension pot accumulating, politically correct middle class tossers who were picked as judges because of their family connections, old school tie or because they ticked one of the right politically correct boxes - such as Peter Herbert the judge who is the head of the Black Lawyers Association.

It appears that a judge who tells the truth is to be regarded as a threat.

It appears that a judiciary that has the temerity to regards itself as independent of the government must be threatened and an example sent out to the rest of them.

Go to your local court.

Go the listing section and see the cases listed for that day.

Note the names of the people before the court.

In most cases they are foreigners unless you are blessed to live in a white area.

Most judges know the extent of crime involving foreigners but they are paid well to keep their mouthes shut.

This judge didnt.

Expect him to be sacked or disciplined to send a signal out to the rest.

This is also why any soldiers who dare speak out about lack of kit, crap equipment etc are also threatened.

A JUDGE who spoke out to highlight Britain’s “completely lax”immigration system faces an investigation that could lead to hisremoval from the bench.

Supporters of Judge Ian Trigger were left outraged yesterday onhearing of the probe following concerns he made while sentencing aJamaican drug dealer who should have been deported years ago.

He noted that Lucien McClearley, 31, had remained in the UK to selldrugs and said “hundreds of thousands” of illegal immigrants wereflooding here, placing a huge burden on the taxpayer.

His comments were cheered by politicians, pressure groups andthink-tanks for highlighting the UK’s border problems but infuriatedGordon Brown’s Government.

Now the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge, has referred the outburst tothe Office of Judicial Complaints to rule on whether it was toopolitical.

But last night there was outcry that the probe might have far-reachingeffects on other judges who wish to raise genuine concerns.

Sir Andrew Green, founder of MigrationWatch, said: “There is a greatdeal of concern, privately expressed, in the judiciary about thenumber of cases involving failed asylum seekers. There ought to besome way in which this concern can be expressed without infringingjudicial guidelines.”

Matthew Elliott, of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “It is disgracefulthat political correctness is now intervening in the judicialprocess.”

Judge Trigger made his scathing comments last Tuesday after his courtheard McClearley had entered the UK in 2001 on a visitor’s visa.

He was arrested in 2002 after overstaying his welcome but appealed forasylum and was released while this was pending, allowing him to“disappear”.

His application was finally rejected in March 2004 but he was arrestedonly last February when police noticed his car reeked of cannabis.Liverpool Crown Court heard how police found £3,700 of cannabis, afake driving licence and passport and a gram of cocaine.

Judge Trigger jailed him for two years for drugs offences, stressingthat he hoped he would be deported after serving his sentence, saying:“Your case illustrates all too clearly the completely lax immigrationpolicy that exists in this country.

“People like you, and there are literally hundreds and hundreds ofthousands of people like you, come to these shores from foreigncountries to avail themselves of the generous welfare benefits thatexist here.”

The final decision on whether the judge stepped out of line will bemade by Lord Judge and the Lord Chancellor, Jack Straw. If thecomplaint is upheld, sanctions include reprimand or even dismissal.