You are currently viewing the old forums. We have upgraded to a new NFL Forum. This old forum is being left as a read-only archive.
Please update your bookmarks to our new forum at forums.footballsfuture.com.

Still think this guy is gonna be cheap and still think he has some tread left on the tires. I think he could give GB a big time spark both as a receiver and a runner. If you believe the rumors that TT has tried many times to acquire Jackson, one has to think hell make a move for him now that he is a FA.

RELENTLESS pass rusher that brings a boosted pass rush to our DL. Want a RDE that will make us forget about Jenkins? This is your guy.

I am typically against going high DPs in back-to-back years, however, a torn ACL is a major injury, and we might realistically be without Worthy for quite sometime. Perhaps it is time to invest in another premium pass rusher to raise our defense back to championship level.

Physical and fast. Demonstrated the necessary coverage ability to slide into a solid mid-level CB prospect. Adequate height, but his greatest strength is the nasty demeanor he plays with. Anyone else think it is time to upgrade over Tramon Williams? Taylor might be the guy.

Tough, physical Safety with quickness and ball skills. Flying under the radar and expected to be there at the end of Round 3. Improves our secondary and gives us another talented S to pair with Morgan Burnett.

With the 126th pick in the 2013 NFL Draft, the Green Bay Packers select...
Traded

Some depth at FB could be used and Wilson is the best lead blocker in the country. We seem to struggle in short yardage situations, and the thought of giving Kuhn the ball and putting Wilson in as a blocker might remedy this problem.

Consistent 75% FG kicker in college has hit beyond 50 yards several times throughout his career. A good prospect to challenge Crosby for his starting job._________________
Thanks packerbacker87 for the sig!

1. You reached for Wheaton in the 2nd, when Woods or Patton (both better options) might still be there (some of these guys are expected to drop with guys like Patterson/Hopkins' stock rising). OTOH, Wheaton might fall to the 3rd round.

2. Sheldon Richardson might not be there by the time we pick. Most recent mocks I've seen had him going to Carolina at 14, which most likely leaves one of Keenan Allen or Terrance Williams (possibly both) and Johnathan Hankins falling to us. The next 2 picks ahead of us, Minnesota and Seattle, both have needs at either DL or WR, leaving us with any one of the 3 for the taking. IDK about you, but I'd personally rather have Hankins or Allen/T. Williams, but that's just my take. Richardson probably won't be there, anyway, according to most recent mock drafts, like I said.

3. No C or TE? While starting EDS won't necessarily be the end of the world in getting both Sherrod and Bulaga back next year (I think most people are seriously underestimating our OL next year with both of those guys coming back), we could definitely use a guy who will either compete with him for the starting C spot or fill-in as depth behind him. We could also use a TE in the draft, since I don't see us keeping Finley beyond next year. We'll need a guy to groom and eventually replace him, or better yet, pair with Finley in a 2 TE set for one year. That would be just unreal.

4. Shawn Williams is a SS, I'd prefer a starting FS (Tony Jefferson and Baccari Rambo might still be there in the 3rd) so we can move Burnett to SS, his natural position. Williams and Burnett in their respective positions wouldn't necessarily be bad, but Burnett would be a lot more effective at SS.

All-in-all, good draft in terms of players/talent, but in terms of filling positions of need (and value at some spots), it certainly has room for improvement. Then again, no one expects perfection out of these mocks, so I guess I can wing it.

I like the draft but I think Richardson is a top 20 lock. Also, not a fan of drafting 2 wr's, but i like Wheaton a lot. I'd rather take a center in the 3rd, we don't need a cb that bad._________________