Oh, I see. Thanks!
Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood
On Dec 15, 2012, at 13:41, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> David,
> you lost the answer to your question when you truncated my message. Indeed, you're missing the sentence in between that reads "Now, with an aggregation model these answers can change. In the simplest form, it could be something like this:"
>
> So, to clarify, the model applications can handle on their own is a basic aggregation model where the server isn't expected to do anything special - like deleting member resources when the container is deleted. As of Lyon, we agreed to define the composition model in LDP and left the aggregation model to be proposed by those who feel the need for it. We have yet to see a concrete proposal.
> --
> Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
>
>
> David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote on 12/15/2012 10:14:05 AM:
>
> > From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
> > To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS,
> > Cc: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
> > Date: 12/15/2012 10:14 AM
> > Subject: Re: LDP Agenda for December 17, 2012, with a list of issues
> > to be closed
> >
> > On Dec 15, 2012, at 12:43, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > I agree these are good questions but I don't think the answer is
> > just yes or no. They depend on the model you're talking about:
> >
> > With the composition model adopted in Lyon, the answers are:
>
> > ...
> >
> > > When a container is deleted do are all its members deleted also?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> > ...
> >
> > > When a container is deleted are all its members deleted also?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > As it was pointed out though, there is nothing stopping you from
> > implementing this at the application level because it doesn't
> > require any special handling by the server. This is why we decided
> > in Lyon to focus on composition.
> >
> > Um, which is it? Perhaps the quoting levels were off in the message
> > that I received, but I'm unclear on the current position of the
> > group. Thanks.
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dave
> > --
> > http://about.me/david_wood
> >