Ghadersohi v. Health Research

The opinion of the court was delivered by: William M. Skretny United States District Judge

ORDER ON MOTIONS AND SCHEDULING ORDER

1. On April 20, 2009, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a Motion to Expedite. (Docket No. 53.) He seeks an expedited hearing on his sealed Motion to Enforce (Docket No. 52), which was filed on March 11, 2009. Defendant followed, on April 24, 2009, with a Motion to Seal (Docket No. 54) its response to the Motion to Enforce.

2. Motions to expedite are governed by Rule 7.1(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has failed to include all of the submissions required by Local Rule 7.1(d), and failed to deliver a courtesy copy of his motion papers to chambers. Denial of the motion is warranted on this basis alone.

3. Furthermore, the purpose of a motion to expedite is to shorten the ten-day notice period set forth in Local Rule 7.1(c). Because more that ten days have passed from the date Plaintiff filed his motion to enforce, the motion to shorten time is moot.

Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.