Council members say they‘re ready to talk with RIAC

Members of the City Council said yesterday that this is the time to open talks with the Rhode Island Airport Corporation (RIAC) and see if an agreement can be reached before the council’s appeal is heard in the federal court.

“Let’s all sit down and use the next couple of months and do the best we can to address the problems,” Ward 7 Councilman Charles Donovan Jr. said. “Just to say no for the sake of saying no doesn’t help anyone.”

Donovan said he talked with California aviation attorney Steve Taber, who the council voted to retain, and that Taber told him it would be at least two months before arguments are heard on the city’s petition for a review of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) decision approving an extension to Green Airport’s longer runway and safety area improvements to the shorter one. Donovan said Taber advised him that the council should use the time to see if it can come to an agreement.

Ward 9 Councilman Steve Merolla is also of the opinion that an agreement, rather than a court battle, would be to the benefit of the city and the council. His question is who is going to take the lead. Should he be the one to do it, the mayor, or should they do it jointly?

“I’m one council member and I’m suddenly getting appointed,” he said.

“I just want to get the problem solved,” he added.

What Merolla says he wants is a timetable that would define what actions are going to be taken and when, so as to end the uncertainty faced by residents and businesses whose property would be taken. He also wants to see a timetable for the completion of a system for the collection of de-icing fluids, relocation of the Winslow Park ball fields and a commitment for continued air quality monitoring.

“I’ll go over and meet with him,” Merolla said of RIAC President and CEO Kevin Dillon. “I would rather go with Scott [Avedisian] and Peter [Ruggiero]. I don’t want to be in the middle of this.”

“Personally, I’m in favor of a runway extension for safety reasons,” he said.

Merolla doesn’t believe the stated purpose of extending the runway from 7,166 to 8,700 so as to provide non-stop service to the West Coast is reason for the project, but safety is.

“This is a problem. This is a business issue; let’s sit down and solve it like a business issue,” he said.

Dillon confirmed yesterday that he has talked with some members of the council. He said he welcomes sitting down with council members and working on an agreement. He said RIAC initiated the talks.

“Councilman Merolla has been the most outspoken on this,” Dillon said.

And in response to issues raised by Merolla, Dillon said he is prepared to address issues such as the timing of acquisitions and the treatment of de-icing fluids.

“I feel very positively that Kevin Dillon is reaching out to the council. It’s a great move. We’re not against airport growth. It’s a great idea for both parties to create an enforceable community benefits agreement that is a win-win situation for all parties,” she said.

City Council President Bruce Place said he hasn’t been contacted by RIAC in the last week, but “I have no problems sitting down with anyone, provided there are no violations of open meeting laws.”

He said the council’s action, although he was not present for the vote, was an expression of the frustration felt by council members and the public that RIAC has disregarded concerns over air and water pollution.

“No one in the council is anti-airport development,” Place said in response to a Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce letter calling on the council to drop its appeal.

As for going forward with the suit, Place said $65,000 has been appropriated and that he is prepared to advocate for more money – “another $200,000” – in next year’s budget.

Dillon is somewhat mystified as the council rejected a memorandum of agreement that he and the city administration worked out in 2010, prior to the record of decision that was rendered this September. At an October 2010 council meeting, Dillon said more than once that the proposed agreement was a starting point and that if council members had issues they could sit down and go over them.

He said the de-icing collection system could be made a part of the agreement but was not included at the time because it is part of a permit agreement with the Department of Environmental Management. He said under the terms of the permit, RIAC would discontinue its practice of vacuuming the de-icing fluid that is glycol and it would flow into a system that would hold the runoff and process it before it is disposed of in the Warwick sewer system. Under the permit, RIAC is to have 30 percent of the system designed by next week and fully designed by the end of next year. Construction is to take place in 2014 and it is to be fully operational by 2015.

He said, “The trick is to build a system big enough” to handle the storage of the runoff until it can be processed. Also an issue is the financing of the $25 million project.

“We’re not going to get a FAA grant. It is so low on their priorities,” he said.

Dillon said RIAC would have to fully underwrite the cost of the system unless it was able to gain grants from sources other than the FAA.

As for who should be negotiating at this point, Donovan said regardless of who is at the table he wants to have City Planner William DePasquale there because of his extensive knowledge about the airport. He urged that the next two months be put to good use.

“It is more critical now, more than ever, so we aren’t stuck in limbo,” he said.

Mayor Scott Avedisian could not be reached for comment.

His chief of staff Mark Carruolo said, “the mayor negotiated a draft agreement and the council rejected it. Shouldn’t it be up to them to do it?”

Comments

Mr Dillon said: "the de-icing collection system could be made a part of the agreement but was not included at the time because it is part of a permit agreement with the Department of Environmental Management. He said under the terms of the permit, RIAC would discontinue its practice of vacuuming the de-icing fluid that is glycol and it would flow into a system that would hold the runoff and process it before it is disposed of in the Warwick sewer system. Under the permit, RIAC is to have 30 percent of the system designed by next week and fully designed by the end of next year. Construction is to take place in 2014 and it is to be fully operational by 2015."

How long does it take to design this system? This sounds like a big stall to me. RIAC does not have the money to build the pollution control plant without putting the arm on the airlines -- who should be paying by the way. This plant must be put into the funding and construction phase before any agreement on the expansion is put in place with the city.

That RIAC can't complete the plans for it for 13 more months is totally unacceptable. RIAC should fire the current design firm if it cannot turn the design around in a month's time.

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

anonsnoinipo

Hee Hee Hee - The city council falling into RIAC's traps.

Read the Record of Decision. It does not address funding: Nor does it adequately address mitigation. In fact. typically most city representatives do not even know what FAA / RIAC will be required to do by law or how to make sure it is funded. That is one of the reasons municipalities typical hire an experienced law firm. I hope the city council doesn't drop the ball on this one.

City Council had better not make a deal with the devil at the expense of constituents. They had better stick with their deal at election time to protect constituents.

Face the facts, there is not sufficient funding at this point.

City Council Members need to face the facts that if RIAC signs an agreement to do something and they don't get the funding they will not do what they agree to do and constituents will then remind city council they signed an unenforeible agreement.

The Warwick Beacon is having a Christmas Decorating Contest! Winners will receive a family FOUR PASSES to Trinity Rep. Live in Warwick and decorate your house for Christmas? Enter today by registering and posting a photo!