Jews secretly want to be Holocausted, some believe. They subconsciously crave the next pogrom, and work to bring it about. Only antisemitism affirms the existence of the Jew. Only the Pogrom confirms his specialness, his Chosenness. Without antisemitism, the people who call themselves "Jews" are just a random hotchpotch of Khazars, Turks, Maghrebis and Arabs, with a small admixture of European genes due to conversion and sexual enslavement. Only Antisemitism can bring about an artificial unity among the disparate members of this mongrel tribe. The Jews need antisemitism like a junkie needs his fix.

Or so some have theorised, anyway. The NY Times has a similar theory about the Alt Right. We actually want to have our free speech suppressed and be unpersoned.

But what gave these trolls power on platforms wasn’t just their willingness to act in bad faith and to break the rules and norms of their environment. It was their understanding that the rules and norms of platforms were self-serving and cynical in the first place. After all, these platforms draw arbitrary boundaries constantly and with much less controversy — against spammers, concerning profanity or in response to government demands. These fringe groups saw an opportunity in the gap between the platforms’ strained public dedication to discourse stewardship and their actual existence as profit-driven entities, free to do as they please. Despite their participatory rhetoric, social platforms are closer to authoritarian spaces than democratic ones. It makes some sense that people with authoritarian tendencies would have an intuitive understanding of how they work and how to take advantage of them.

This was also a moment these hate groups were anticipating; getting banned in an opaque, unilateral fashion was always the way out and, to some degree, it suits them. In the last year, hard-right communities on social platforms have cultivated a pre-emptive identity as platform refugees and victims of censorship. They’ve also been preparing for this moment or one like it: There are hard-right alternatives to Twitter, to Reddit and even to the still-mostly-lawless 4chan. There are alternative fund-raising sites in the mold of GoFundMe or Kickstarter; there’s an alternative to Patreon called Hatreon. Like most of these new alternatives, it has cynically borrowed a cause — it calls itself a site that ‘‘stands for free speech absolutism’’ — that the more mainstream platforms borrowed first. Their persecution narrative, which is the most useful narrative they have, and one that will help spread their cause beyond the fringes, was written for them years ago by the same companies that helped give them a voice.

With our superior knowledge of authoritarianism, we cunningly manipulated these companies into banning us. We are playing thousand-dimension chess. And all these companies just lost. But they don't know it yet, because we haven't been able to tell them, what with our speech being suppressed and all. Once we get our free speech back, though, we will be sure and tell them that the game is over and we have officially won.

:D Oh yeah, now you are reliable source :D :D :D. Your Satan is the same Jewish invention like Yahweh, so go to the synagogue and fuck yourself with Torah you stupid Jewish cunt. And take that stupid conspiracy theories with yourself.

Anti-Semitism has always seemed a bit strange to me. If it was easy to see why people would object to the presence of Muslims or negroes in their countries, because of the obvious problems they cause, hostility to the presence of Jews always seemed much more mysterious.

After all, with generally positive social indicators in relation to crime levels, educational attainment, income, etc., as well as notable successes in the intellectual field, who in their right mind would object to Jews?

Jews lost their country and then lived as a harried diaspora at the mercy of others. That mercy was not always forthcoming. Their story is a tragic tale of persecution and peregrination. In the end, after centuries of this, they concluded that they only way they could be safe was to retake their own home and hold it so they would no longer be dependent on the mercy of others. And, of course, they were absolutely right about that. I am unstinting in my support for Israel, because the Jews have the right to their home, just as any people does.

But there were no 'pogroms' as we have been led to believe by Jewish owned media: they were minor outbreaks, sometimes prompted by jews, and there was almost no loss of life and only minor material damage to property. The British Government, after the Daily Telegraph, The Times and the Jewish World, had together concocted these stories in the 19th century, and aroused the righteous indignation of the British people, ordered all its consulates and its Ambassador in Russia to send detailed reports to it about these supposed pogroms, and it dispatched its own staff to look into and interview Russian officials, Russian rabbis, and tour the country examining the supposed desecrations and damages and they all reported back about the massively inflated reports and stories for which the British and Jewish press in Britain were responsible for inventing. And as for the holocaust, we know so much of the truth about that as well. The Jews don't 'need' so-called "anti-semitism": what they need and create are lies, distortions, obfuscations and hyperbole and they always need a receptive audience (their extensive ownership of press guarantees that). The historical reaction throughout Europe, of eventually losing patience with their conduct and expelling them or openly stating anger with their conduct is not what the jews want as 'anti-semitism.' What they want and need is the mirror image of their own hostility; that is what rabbinical judaism has done to them.