Waiting for location permission...

Broadcast and play with friends

Waiting for location permission...

This site uses Cookies for basic functionality for visitors who have accounts with us. Also, our trusted and reputable third party advertisers use cookies to determine which ads to serve.

We care a lot about your privacy and making sure that your experience on this site is a safe one, and in that effort we store as little information as possible. You can read more about that in our 2018 GDPR statement here.

Please accept our terms of use which can be found here. If you have any questions, or you do not agree and would like us to opt you out, please contact us using the contact form.

The most recent core set introduced Gigantosaurus, a creature with ten power and toughness that costs only five mana and has no drawbacks.

I understand that creatures are gradually becoming more powerful, but that card is not remotely balanced. To have such a huge power/toughness to mana cost ratio, it would need to have a drawback of some form, but it does not.

Therefore, I ask the users of this forum: how is that card even remotely balanced?

August 28, 2018
11:01 p.m.

August 28, 2018
11:15 p.m.

As mentioned, the highly specific mana cost is one reason. And its lack of evasion (ie, flying, menace) and trample means it can be chump blocked readily. There are plenty of cheap deathtouch creatures (such as Skittering Heartstopper that will trade with it and plentiful removal to kill it. That being said, I have had it out turns 3 and attacked with trample on it by turn 4... It all depends on what you play with it.

August 29, 2018
7:21 a.m.

While mana:power/toughness ratio is a decent way of quickly assessing the value of a creature, it's far from the only consideration and raw p/t increases suffer from pretty serious diminishing returns. 10 power is good because it'll kill a full health opponent in just 2 hits but with no evasion and no defenses a 10/10 is exactly as good against 1/1s or a Murder as a 5/5 would be, which, given it costs 5 mana, the opponent is reasonably likely to have by that point. Compare it to something like Deity of Scars, which is significantly smaller but is still going to be better in most situations.

August 29, 2018
11:03 a.m.

Like, as everyone has been saying, this card is essentially only useful in mono-green decks and has to be cast for the five green mana. That's a huge drawback, especially since to cast it, you need five green producing sources, and even then the only thing it really is a vanilla beat stick.

In the case of Ghalta, Primal Hunger you have a mana cost to power+toughness ratio of 1:2, with creatures however it could actually shift to an amount of mana paid to p+t ratio of 1:12. However, it's a lot easier to cast off the back with mana ramp artifacts, creatures etc. Not to mention it has an evasion ability. It's much more easily splashable in the right decks and can potentially be cast many turns earlier.

Carnage Tyrant has a similar claim. It's mana cost to power+toughness ratio is 6:13, or to look at numbers much more easily, 1:2.17. Not to mention, it has both protection against removal, against prevention of it's casting and an evasive ability. For it's cost, it's also easier to cast in multi-color decks.

Finally, Wayward Swordtooth is perhaps the easiest of the four cards to cast in multicolor, with a much harder drawback than the other three mentioned in return for a larger mana cost to p+t ratio. Comparatively, it's 3:10, or 1:3.33 ratio seems like the best, but it has the downside of essentially being an enchantment until you have 10 permanents in play. It also lacks both evasion and protection abilities. However, to combat that, it has an ability that makes it's downside more negligible AND with more uses than a basic beatstick such as Gigantosaurus.

However, with just a large beatstick isn't always useful. Let's say you're on turn six in a group game against a token deck, a midrange creature based deck and a control deck. If you have a Wayward Swordtooth in hand, you can cast that, play an additional land and potentially play some removal to deal with the midrange decks creature before your dino is dealt with. If you have creatures, you can play your Ghalta, Primal Hunger and have a serious threat that may intimidate each opponent while leaving you with mana to protect it. If you cast the Carnage Tyrant, you don't only have a threat, but you also don't need to worry about target removal or your spell being countered. However, if you cast the Gigantosaurus, not only do you have to worry about protecting it while maybe not having the mana, you also have to worry that it'll be chump blocked without dealing damage or aiding you in anyway.

You should also worry about the colored mana to power+toughness ratio. That's also important. For example, Ghalta, Primal Hunger has a colored mana to p+t ratio of 1:12, Carnage Tyrant has a colored mana to p+t ratio of 2:13, or rewritten as 1:6.5, and Wayward Swordtooth has one of 1:10. Gigantosaurus has one that's 1:2, which is decidedly worse than all the others.

tl,dr: A creature that's vanilla is generally a downside already, regardless of p+t ratio, colored mana to power+toughness ratio matters and abilities make a card deservedly better in the long run.

August 29, 2018
5:27 p.m.

You're looking at this wrong - there is a drawback to a cost - the mana cost itself. As others have said in more detail, that basically locks you into mono-Green, which creates all sorts of problems for deckbuilding.

To put it another way, compare to - Wizards clearly understands coloured mana is more difficult to muster than generic, and invented an entirely new mana symbol to reflect this fact. In fact, if we look at Gigantosaurus in terms of hybrid mana, its converted mana cost would be 10.

August 29, 2018
5:51 p.m.

just out of curiosity, what creatures have you been playing in your decks until now, that follow this little rule of yours? have you really never experienced someone in your playgroup using a creature that broke that rule?

August 29, 2018
8:40 p.m.

Magic the Gathering, FNM is TM and copyright Wizards of the Coast, Inc, a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc. All rights reserved. This site is unaffiliated. Articles and comments are user-submitted and do not represent official endorsements of this site.