Pages

Saturday, March 21, 2015

Drafting Patterns from Extant Garments

Ever
wondered how to take those line drawings of an extant garment—like those
Medieval Garments Reconstructed, Marc Carlson’s database, or Patterns of
Fashion--, and make it fit you, while remaining as true to the original garment
as possible? Or better, photographs of the garment itself and figure what shape
the pieces are? This is the method I used for most of my major projects; The Sture Suit,G63, and most notably my Moselund Kirtle, as well as a number of projects which are planned but not constructed.

A point on terminology for reconstructing garments (this is what I use): A museum replica is a piece made entirely with the correct technology, to be as close to identical to the extant piece when new (as possibly). A working replica (what this class is geared towards making) is patterned from, and maintains the proportions of the extant as much as possible while having it fit you, as well as construction and definition; however, the fabric might not be spun/woven to order. "Inspired by" I do not consider to be reconstructing a garment--you may be making a perfectly good, period piece, but the goal isn't to get as close to a specific extant garment as possible.

For the first, it’s a fairly simple
matter of proportions and scaling, although the more shaping there is in the
garment, such as in a doublet, the more the proportions need to play off of
each other.For instance, keeping the
proportion of the back to the front.Naturally, with anything fitted some…finagling…will be required (unless
by some miracle your shape is the same as the original owner).

When it comes to drafting from the
garment itself, it is quite a bit more difficult, since all we have to work
with are photographs.If you are lucky,
they will be of good quality.It helps a
great deal if the garment is laying flat, with as few wrinkles as possible—even
so, the sleeves require a fair amount of guesswork.Basically, trace over the photo, including
all seam lines; then measure, paying attention to the grainlines, and carrying
the measure to the other side if a piece is on both the front and back.

For most garments—particularly
loose ones with an armscye, like the Greenland finds—I like to use the shoulder
measurement as the basis, since on many garments it is at the point of the
shoulder, or close to it (in which case you must use your judgment, based on
your knowledge of the type of garment).Likewise, with fitted garments you will have to use your judgment to
determine the amount of ease (remembering, as always, to add extra ease for the
linings, etc.).

[1]Once you
have chosen your garment, and made copies of the line drawing--I suggest having
two copies, one for the original measurements, and one for the scaled version--,
you need to find the scale.In Patterns
of Fashion the scale is built into the line drawings.For others, and when you are working from a
garment photograph, you need to figure it out using your choice of whatever
measurements are provided.I find one of
the safest ones (and common) is the vertical measurement, from the shoulder to
the hem.Measure the photograph at that
point and divide it into the given measurement(i.e. if the garment length is
1090mm, and the photograph is 153mm at the same point, you will end with 7.12
to 1.Or, if you prefer not to work in
metric it would be 42.9 divided by 153 and your measure is 0.28 to 1).As a note, I like to use metric and
millimeters for precision[2].

The resulting number is your
scale.Start taking a full complement of
measurements off the photograph or drawing, and multiply all of them by scale,
marking each down on your line drawing.

Once you have those down, mark all
the grain lines where you can.This is
partially because slits for gores can be deceptive—slightly angled or flared.

Chose a measurement to scale
from.Divide the original by your
measurement there.For the Greenland
garments, I suggest the (front) shoulders, since it is the only measurement
which doesn’t have much in the way of ease (example; the shoulders of the
extant come out to 16.8”, and you will divide it by your shoulder width (17”)
giving me 1 to 1 scale).Most of the
horizontal measurements shouldn’t need adjusting from the proportions.However, if you are tall (particularly tall
and thin), the length adjustments may need a second proportion, going off of
the sleeve length—which may get its own length proportion, possibly width as
well depending on your bicep measurement.

In the detailed patterns of PoF, as they are
more closely fitted, you have to essentially plug more of your measurements in,
adding the appropriate ease (i.e. divide your half waist measure by the same on
the garment for that proportion.Then
repeat for the bust measure).This is
particularly necessary for garments that have the side seam towards the back.The height of the shoulders should be in
proportion (front and back), since the slope is typically not right on top of
the shoulder.In all cases, you have to
use your judgment to determine whether measurements need adjustment as you go
(for instance if the garment is supposed to have the front gore end at the
waist, and you have an extremely short torso, you may have to adjust).

Repeat, transferring and scaling,
same as for the first.Do not attempt to
include any seam allowances yet.

At this point—if the garment is
fairly geometric—figure out your cutting layout, marking out each of the pieces,
and adding the seam allowances in.Then
you can scale it up, using the measurements you wrote down to draft it on your
fabric.As always, use a mockup if you
are uncertain.Something I like to do is
cut the sleeve out last, so you can check the fit.