24 Comments / User Reviews

Wow! That's the same king (GeorgeIII) that the American colonies were rebelling against. It's interesting that the Quakers tried a more humane approach in York; they were also instrumental in designing the "Penitentiary," modeled on monasteries, as a reform measure to barbaric punishments for crime. Incidentally, the Quakers are now opposing prison as a way of dealing with crime!!

There is an excellent movie on The Madness of King George with Michael Caine as the physican. this documentary fails to inform, King George peed blue, indicitive of a disease. Yes, the physician imparted discipline within the mind /actions of King George but the real cure was when he stopped peeing blue. The medical world now knows what this condition is. In King Georges' case, it subsided by itself and unfortunetly this 'documentary' makes no mention of this malady.

Meh, the documentary doesn't describe how "mental illness" was used by governments to silence people. In the case of the King, for instance, it's more probable that records describe him becoming mad in order to punish and threaten him for not doing as he was told by those powerful around him, or by those who simply wished him to disappear, wished to discredit him. It continues to use the language of "treatment" and so on, even when it was apparent that "treatments" like the spinning chair were simply punishments and not an attempt to cure suppose madness. This shows a significant bias on the part of producers to legitimate the psychiatric profession, rather than to question it through the lens of history. Lastly, the documentary does not address the fact that so-called "madness" could have been the result of drugging (i.e, drugging the King's and other patient's food) as still occurs today, or that "treatments" could have included drugs that actually make people psychotic as still occurs to present day in psychiatric "treatments." All in all, the documentary did not do enough to present a thoughtful account of the abuses committed in these "madness" institutions, or possible political, social, economic and simply power related explanations for the very labeling of madness itself. I would rate this a one or two out of five.

Very interesting. definitely worth watching if you have a mental illness or know someone who does. Try to imagine being locked in there, it must have been terrifying to be a spectacle and to be experimented on. I am so glad mental health systems have gotten much better since those times and have a somewhat real understanding, or at least try to. I am glad i live now rather than then, or else i would be in that situation.

interesting doc to say the least.. a bit light-hearted, yet informative. the airloom is remarkable, i think, in that its the forerunner of the modern "microwave mind control" mania, and for the level of detail to the extreme. it would also appear 18th century brits really knew how to take a day off... a choice of visiting an asylum on tour, or attending a harlot whipping beats my local choices of beach or casino hands down....

This was a fantastic documentary! I love these gems that come up I know I would have never seen if not for this site.

I have no idea why the government had such a strong interest in keeping Mathews locked up over his airloom story. Seems like anyone meddling in politics would be thrown away regardless of the legitimacy of their work.

I really liked It! It was informative and entertaining. Bedlem has a new meaning and I a new perspective on the the ever thining line between sane and insane, and who determins either. Most intriging was the artist renderings

Truthseeker420 I would most likely be in a forest somewhere, don;t no though.

KsDevil
- 12/04/2011 at 00:02

Different time, different culture. Applyng modern cultural norms do not do history justice. However, arrogance and ignornace still abound concerning those outside the status quo. And it is still wondered, who truely is sane.

LOL! I don't know where you hail from, but round my way, believing that malicious foreign agents may be plotting to project behaviour modification beams into your head, using strange new technologies, is hardly a cultural norm. Unless of course we're talking about the mainstream media and television, and that really is scary stuff! ;)

I was simply commenting on the striking resemblance between Matthew's "air loom" theories, and some of the more sinister theories regarding HAARP's theoretical potential for behaviour modification....

....Or maybe they really *are* cultural norms, and I'm woefully out of touch these days! :)

Joking aside though, all I was hinting at, albeit it in a rather oblique manner, is the nature of extreme paranoia, and how little some of the narratives seem to have changed. Which I find intriguing, given that we live in such a different world. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose, an' all that jazz. :)

Earthwinger
- 12/03/2011 at 19:39

I'm guessing that if James Tilly Matthews were alive today, he'd have something to say about HAARP.