United States v. Mao

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFFv.RAYMOND MAO, AND ELISA CHING DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Morrison C. England Jr.

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

The parties request that the status conference currently set for January 14, 2010 be continued to February 25, 2010 at 9:00am in Courtroom 7 and stipulate that the time beginning January 14, 2010 and extending through February 25, 2010 be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties submit that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time so that the counsel for each party may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 USC § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

In particular, counsel for both parties need more time to consider information that may be relevant to their case and sentencing and to negotiate an appropriate disposition. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 USC § 3161(h)(8)(A)

Dated: January 12, 2010

ORDER

The status conference in Case Number CR No. 2: 08-CR-00531-MCE currently set for January 14, 2010 is continued to February 25, 2010 at 9:00 am in Courtroom 7. The time beginning January 14, 2010 and extending through February 25, 2010 is excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The Court finds that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 USA § 3161(h)(7)(A)

Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.