On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:10:22 -0700
Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com> wrote:
> ACTION (?): Amy to present credible proof-of-concept bindings for
> multis
> at next FTF.
Respectfully decline to do so.
The "multis" are not multicast-related, and I was never a proponent of
them. I do not, in fact, understand what networking paradigm they are
thought to embody, or who has advocated them.
The "multis" appear to be serial unicast: a trigger message starts a
flow of messages from some other participant, which eventually stops. I
feel certain that someone has a reason for proposing such patterns, but
it wasn't me, and I don't know what the reason was or is.
Amy!
--
Amelia A. Lewis
Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
alewis@tibco.com