SUGGR

Solar Updraft Greenhouse Gase Removal

SPRNGG

Solar Photocatalytic Removal of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases

Greenhouse Gas Removal (GGR) will need to be invoked if average surface temperature is to remain under
the 2oC of the Paris
COP21 agreement. Deployment of global scale engineering will be required, quickly, in order to
meet this target. GGR is implicit in RCP2.6 so surely the IPCC already assumes GGR technology will
work?

Projective objectives

to determine whether and how the novel combination of two existing
technologies, solar towers and photocatalysis, might be deployed to eliminate non-CO2 GHGs at a climatically significant
scale,

to assess its wider societal, ecological and environmental impacts if undertaken continuously over several
decades, and

to assist policymakers in making challenging decisions under conditions of extreme uncertainty about
which competing approaches to GGR should be favoured for further research.

Global climate policy is a three-legged stool requiring the simultaneous reduction of dependence on fossil fuel, increase in
dependence on GHG-neutral fuels, and GGR to bridge the gap between the other two. If any of these legs falls short,
climate policy will not be compatible with the UNFCCC intention of 'holding the increase in the global average temperature
to well below 2oC above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5oC above
pre-industrial levels,'. Non-CO2 GHGs represent about one third of the total global warming effect of human GHG
emissions, and of this some 85% is produced by three gases - methane, nitrous oxide and a fluorocarbon CFC-12.
Eliminating them by photocatalysis avoids the need for storage and thereby greatly reduces long term costs and risks, and
also simplifies and shortens the lead time for development and deployment of the technology.

In this multi-disciplinary project, chemists will investigate and optimise the choice of catalysts and their operating conditions
for the elimination of the three high global warming potential (GWP) non-CO2 gases (HiGWPGs). They will also consider
the manufacturing processes and costs implied in scaling the process to climatic significance. Atmospheric scientists will
investigate the local and global climatic impacts of reducing the atmospheric concentration of HiGWPGs. This will include
seeking confirmation of initial expectations that the climatic benefits will not be offset by interactions with the ocean, nor
that any harm might be caused by 'rogue' by-products from the photocatalysis.

SUTs were originally conceived as solar powered electricity generators. SUGGR/SPRNGG will repurpose this technology as a
means of delivering the mass airflow necessary to process the quantity of air required to eliminate HiGWPGs at a
climatically significant scale. However, SUGGR/SPRNGG also recognises that the UNFCCC's objectives are unlikely to be met
without some capture and sequestration of CO2. The construction of a full scale SUT to deliver air for the photocatalytic
elimination of HiGWPGs, offers a valuable experimental environment in which to further examine the at-scale capture and
sequestration of atmospheric CO2.

Any intervention in the global climate will have wide societal, ecological and environmental impacts, indeed, it is intended to
do so as a means of averting the dangers of excessive global warming. However, this positive outcome might be
accompanied by some undesirable outcomes, some of which might be anticipated and others not. Policymakers have an
obligation to present and future generations to ensure that the side effects of their interventions in the global climate will not
be unacceptable. Rather than a problem that will be solved, climate change is a situation that must be managed. Means
must be found whereby policymakers can make sound assessments of the potential impacts, both positive and negative, of
alternative policy choices and then monitor these as policies are implemented in order that they can be adapted to
changing circumstances, new knowledge and evolving perceptions of different communities about what is and is not
acceptable. SUGGR/SPRNGG embraces these uncertainties and in the social science and complexity science components will
investigate and develop policy processes that will inform policymakers' decision making in relation to GGR.

Solar Photocatalytic Removal of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases SPRNGG

Greenhouse Gas Removal (GGR) will need to be invoked to remain under the 2oC of the Paris
COP21 agreement. Deployment of global scale engineering will be required, quickly, in order to
meet this target. GGR is implicit in RCP2.6 so the IPCC already assumes GGR technology will
work. The SPRNGG project addresses a GGR technology appropriate to meeting this target.

Background

It is estimated that GGR of at least 3GtCeq/yr and possibly more than 20GtCeq/yr will be required
depending on how soon fossil fuel emissions peak, how quickly they decline, and their eventual
residual value. GGR at climatically relevant scale requires sufficient airflow given the extreme
dilution of the greenhouse gases (GHGs). The SPRNGG proposal uses solar updraft towers
(SUTs) to generate the necessary mass airflow driven only by solar energy. Located in hot arid
deserts, these comprise large chimneys (500m to 1km or more in height and 100m to 200m in
diameter) at the centre of a large solar collector (a greenhouse about 7km in diameter). The sun
heats the air which exits through the chimney.
Depending on a range of operating variables, a SUT could draw 50km3 or more per day. 10,000
such devices, with a combined footprint of the order of 0.5Mkm2 could process the entire
atmosphere in less than 30 years, and would have the theoretical capacity to access more than
sufficient GHG to accommodate the UNFCCC's targets.

To date little attention has been given to the removal of atmospheric non-CO2 GHGs. Global
Warming Potential (GWP) is a measure of the potency of a GHG and many non-CO2 atmospheric
gases have a high GWP. The three most important (methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and
dichlorodifluoromethane (CCl2F2 - also known as CFC-12) - collectively HiGWPGs) represent
almost 30% of radiative forcing (RF) of the long-lived (lifetimes = 10 years) GHGs. Whereas the
removal of atmospheric CO2 could lead to significant re-emission from the ocean, this is likely to be
less significant for atmospheric HiGWPGs given their relatively small presence in the ocean.
HiGWPGs can be eliminated by photocatalysis (PC) transforming them into benign atmospheric
gases, water vapour and small amounts of volatile compounds, all of which would be much less
active GHGs than their precursors and easily dispersed in the atmosphere. Assessment of the
potential environmental impact of these products dispersed in the upper troposphere is central to the SPRNGG project.
Here are the gas-phase reactions at the core of the SPRNGG project:

The photocatalyst enables us to harness sunlight to promote the destruction of CH4, N2O and the
fluorocarbon.
A major feature of the SUT+PC process is that no capture or sequestration is necessary, thus
greatly reducing costs and risks, and therefore the lead time to deployment. These installations
have virtually no moving parts and should therefore have a working life well in excess of 100 years,
sufficient to secure their economic justification. They will also be almost maintenance free save for
the cleaning of the solar collector and the periodic refreshing of the photocatalytic surfaces.
Attractive as the elimination of HiGWPGs may be, it may not be enough to secure the UNFCCC
target without the removal of some atmospheric CO2. Moreover, only the reduction of atmospheric
CO2 will address ocean acidification. The mass airflow through a SUT can equally be used to
capture CO2, however the processes of direct air capture and sequestration of CO2 require further
research to reach multiple gigatonne per annum scale. Depending on operating conditions, 1,000
SUTs could access some 70GtCO2/yr, requiring only 50% efficiency to capture as much carbon as
is currently being emitted. This project will scope the research needed to assess SUTs as the front
end of climate scale CO2 capture and sequestration.

The project's research questions are:

RQ1. How can SUTs and PC be combined to eliminate HiGWPGs at climate relevant scale
without risking undesirable unintended consequences?

RQ2. How can SUTs built to eliminate HiGWPGs be used as experimental environments to
develop the direct air capture and sequestration of atmospheric CO2 in climatically relevant
amounts?

RQ3. How can alternative GGR approaches best be broadly grouped in order to inform
meaningful comparisons between?

RQ4. To what extent would the SUT+PC GGR approach interact with other social and natural
systems, and how does this differ from other GGR approaches?

RQ5. How can the CLCA methodology be adapted to account for the intended climatic effects of
different broadly-grouped GGR approaches and their long term wider socio-political,
economic, ecological, environmental and ethical impacts, both expected and unexpected,
that affect their viability as feasible approaches in the 'real world', recognising that climate
change is a situation to be managed rather than a problem to be solved and that policy,
including GGR, will develop heuristically?

The core theory of SUTs as a source of solar powered electricity generation was established in the
1980s using a large experimental prototype. Since then further theoretical work has been
undertaken to improve their performance for power generation. In addition to repurposing SUTs as
a delivery mechanism for a giant photocatalytic reactor (GPR), this project will also consider ways
in which they could be used as an experimental environment for the research and development of
CO2 capture and sequestration, and in particular investigate ways in which, using abundant solar
power, it could be sequestered in solid form as a means of avoiding the liquefaction of CO2 for
subterranean storage, thereby ensuring more permanent and lower risk storage, and easier
monitoring, reporting and verification of amounts sequestered, a factor likely to be of considerable
importance in the geopolitics of GGR.

The project also confronts the challenge of informing policymakers of the relative merits of
alternative GGR approaches given their diverse modes of operation and the considerable
differences between the range and nature of their consequential impacts. Life cycle analysis (LCA)
is codified in a series of ISO standards. These standards, and derivatives of them, are largely
designed to encourage manufacturers and service providers to account for the wider ecological
and environmental impacts of their products throughout their lives. . However, standard LCA does
not deal well with products implemented in future global scenarios that are very different from the
current ones. To extend the standard approach, the project will apply methods developed in
complexity science to consequential LCA (CLCA) to identify those factors required by a
comprehensive CLCA capable of sound discrimination between alternative GGR approaches to be
been used in the later stages of the programme for inter-consortia comparison. It will address
boundary setting, non-linearity and path dependency, and valuation issues arising from the
discounting of monetary values over extended periods and impacts of systems and processes that
defy monetisation. The project will illustrate the implementation of this methodology by its
application to the SUT+PC combination to eliminate HiGWPGs at a climatically relevant scale.
Major achievements of this project are anticipated to be threefold:

1. specification of a technically viable, cost effective, environmentally sensitive, socially
acceptable technology for the elimination of climatically relevant amounts of HiGWPGs that
is capable of being deployed within the next 10 years and being scaled to climatic
significance within 30 years;

2. theoretical assessments of SUT-based technologies for scaling direct air capture of CO2 to
climatically relevant amounts and specification of the parameters for its permanent and safe
sequestration in ways that facilitate monitoring, reporting and validation; and

3. a CLCA methodology designed for comparability across diverse GGR approaches with
complex impacts on globally extensive social and natural systems over extended periods,
illustrated by its application to the long term at-scale deployment of multiple SUT+PC
installations for the elimination of climatically relevant amounts of HiGWGPs.
For further information contact Dr Hugh Hunt hemh1 at cam.ac.uk