ABSTRACT In order to establish a causal relation between shift work and cardiovascular disease (CVD), we need to verify the pathways from the former to the latter. This paper aims to review the current knowledge of the mechanisms between shift work and CVD. Shift work can increase the risk of CVD by several interrelated psychosocial, behavioral, and physiological mechanisms. The psychosocial mechanisms relate to difficulties in controlling working hours, decreased work-life balance, and poor recovery following work. The most probable behavioral changes are weight gain and smoking. The plausible physiological and biological mechanisms are related to the activation of the autonomic nervous system, inflammation, changed lipid and glucose metabolism, and related changes in the risk for atherosclerosis, metabolic syndrome, and type II diabetes. The data provide evidence for possible disease mechanisms between shift work and CVD, but compelling evidence on any specific mechanism is missing.

[Show abstract][Hide abstract]ABSTRACT:
Objectives Epidemiological studies suggest that long working hours and shift work may increase the risk of chronic diseases, but the “toxic” elements remain unclear due to crude assessment of working time patterns based on self-reports. In this methodological paper, we present and evaluate objective register-based algorithms for assessment of working time patterns and validate a method to retrieve standard payroll data on working hours from the employer electronic records.
Methods Detailed working hour records from employers’ registers were obtained for 12 391 nurses and physicians, a total 14.5 million separate work shifts from 2008–2013. We examined the quality and validity of the obtained register data and designed 29 algorithms characterizing four potentially health-relevant working time patterns: (i) length of the working hours; (ii) time of the day; (iii) shift intensity; and (iv) social aspects of the working hours.
Results The collection of the company-based register data was feasible and the retrieved data matched with the originally published shift plans. The transferred working time records included <0.01% missing data. Two percent were duplicates that could be easily removed. The 29 variables of working time patterns, generated for each year, were stable across the follow-up (year-to-year correlation coefficients from r=0.7–0.9 for 23 variables), their distributions were as expected, and correlations of the variables within the four main dimensions of working hours were plausible.
Conclusion The developed method and algorithms allow a detailed characterization of four main dimensions of working time patterns potentially relevant for health. We recommend this method for future large-scale epidemiological studies.

[Show abstract][Hide abstract]ABSTRACT:
Our current 24-h society requires an increasing number of employees to work nightshifts with millions of people worldwide working during the evening or night. Clear associations have been found between shiftwork and the risk to develop metabolic health problems, such as obesity. An increasing number of studies suggest that the underlying mechanism includes disruption of the rhythmically organized body physiology. Normally, daily 24-h rhythms in physiological processes are controlled by the central clock in the brain in close collaboration with peripheral clocks present throughout the body. Working schedules of shiftworkers greatly interfere with these normal daily rhythms by exposing the individual to contrasting inputs, i.e., at the one hand (dim)light exposure at night, nightly activity and eating and at the other hand daytime sleep and reduced light exposure. Several different animal models are being used to mimic shiftwork and study the mechanism responsible for the observed correlation between shiftwork and metabolic diseases. In this review we aim to provide an overview of the available animal studies with a focus on the four most relevant models that are being used to mimic human shiftwork: altered timing of (1) food intake, (2) activity, (3) sleep, or (4) light exposure. For all studies we scored whether and how relevant metabolic parameters, such as bodyweight, adiposity and plasma glucose were affected by the manipulation. In the discussion, we focus on differences between shiftwork models and animal species (i.e., rat and mouse). In addition, we comment on the complexity of shiftwork as an exposure and the subsequent difficulties when using animal models to investigate this condition. In view of the added value of animal models over human cohorts to study the effects and mechanisms of shiftwork, we conclude with recommendations to improve future research protocols to study the causality between shiftwork and metabolic health problems using animal models.

Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.

Page 1

96?Scand?J?Work?Environ?Health?2010,?vol?36,?no?2ReviewScand?J?Work?Environ?Health?2010;36(2):96–108Shift work and cardiovascular disease – pathways from circadian stress to morbidityby Sampsa Puttonen, PhD,1 Mikko Härmä, MD, PhD,1 Christer Hublin, MD, PhD 1Puttonen S, Härmä M, Hublin C. Shift work and cardiovascular disease – pathways from circadian stress to morbidity. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010;36(2):96–108.In order to establish a causal relation between shift work and cardiovascular disease (CVD), we need to verify the pathways from the former to the latter. This paper aims to review the current knowledge of the mechanisms between shift work and CVD. Shift work can increase the risk of CVD by several interrelated psychosocial, behavioral, and physiological mechanisms. The psychosocial mechanisms relate to difficulties in controlling working hours, decreased work–life balance, and poor recovery following work. The most probable behavioral changes are weight gain and smoking. The plausible physiological and biological mechanisms are related to the activation of the autonomic nervous system, inflammation, changed lipid and glucose metabolism, and related changes in the risk for atherosclerosis, metabolic syndrome, and type II diabetes. The data provide evidence for possible disease mechanisms between shift work and CVD, but compelling evidence on any specific mechanism is missing. Key terms CHD; coronary heart disease; CHD; CVD; literature review; working hour.1 Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.Correspondence to: Sampsa Puttonen, Centre of Expertise on Human Factors at Work, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Topeliuksenkatu 41a A, FI-00250 Helsinki, Finland. [E-mail: sampsa.puttonen@ttl.fi]Despite two decades of reviews, there is still no con-sistent evidence that shift work increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) (1–3). Most epidemio-logic research on the area has focused on the risk for coronary heart disease (CHD). In the latest review based on 16 studies, Frost and coworkers (3) concluded there was limited evidence for a causal relationship between shift work and ischemic heart disease. The term “limited evidence” (3) refers to the fact that a casual relationship between the exposure and disease is possible but could be explained by chance, bias, or confounding. The review by Frost et al (3) showed a stronger association between shift work and morbidity than mortality, suggesting that selection out of shift work or, for example, the use of occupational health screening could weaken the association with mortality. Moreover, CVD is most common among the elderly who are no longer exposed to work-related risk factors of CVD. In a 13-year follow-up study of the Helsinki Heart Study, the relative risk of CHD among shift workers was 1.59 after 5 years. After 13 years, when most of the workers were retired, the risk had decreased to 1.34 (4). The somewhat inconsistent epidemiologic evidence on the association between shift work and CVD is mostly due to common problems in exposure assessment and the selection of a proper control group. Inconsistencies also arise from primary, secondary, and tertiary selection and some may be the result of controlling statistically for the pathways in addition to confounders (5). In order to interpret the epidemiological data cor-rectly, it is necessary to understand the pathways and possible mechanisms mediating the effects of shift work on CVD. We are not aware of any recent reviews on the mechanisms linking shift work to CVD. Ten years ago, Bøggild & Knutsson (1) concluded that there are differ-ent but interrelated pathways that may lead from shift work to disease in general, namely: mismatch of circa-dian rhythms, social disruption, behavioral changes, and changes in the biomarkers of atherosclerosis. During more recent years, the literature on all four of these path-ways has grown considerably. In addition to new studies on biomarkers of atherosclerosis, direct evidence on the association between shift work and atherosclerosis is also emerging (6, 7). This narrative review aimed to discuss the current knowledge on the different pathways from shift work to CVD, which include three major categories: CHD, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease.

Page 2

?Scand?J?Work?Environ?Health?2010,?vol?36,?no?2?97Puttonen?et?alOur focus was on the pathways related to the athero-sclerotic manifestations of the CVD. The review was based on a model where the circadian stress due to work-ing in shifts can induce three different major pathways from shift work to the CVD: a behavioral, psychosocial, and physiological one (figure 1). Shift work is defined as either work at changing hours of the day (eg, morning, afternoon, and night shift) or work at constant but unusual hours of the day (eg, per-manent afternoon shift or permanent night shift) (8). CVD are a group of disorders of the heart and blood vessels (9). The term circadian stress refers to the physiologi-cal, behavioral, and psychosocial consequences related to the disturbances of the human circadian rhythm (eg the sleep–wakefulness rhythm). The timing of 24-hour operations is the major challenge in organizing shift work as well as being one of the major causes of circadian stress. However, shift work may or may not include night work and, besides night work, other unusual or irregular working hours may also cause circadian stress (eg, early morning work). Work stress refers to those aspects of work design, organization, and management, and their social and organizational contexts, that have the potential to cause harm to employee health (10).Psychosocial stress as a pathwayThere is evidence that both socioeconomic status and work stress are risk factors for CVD (11, 12). A system-atic review and meta-analysis by Kivimäki et al (12) concluded that work stress, defined by three prevalent work stress models, was associated with a 50% excess risk of CHD according to prospective studies. Although the individual studies on job strain are partly incon-sistent, an association between low job control and the risk of ischemic heart disease has been repeatedly found (13, 14). Since shift work is associated with both (13, 14). Since shift work is associated with both socioeconomic status and psychosocial factors at work (15), the independency of shift work as a risk factor for CVD has been questioned. Despite having controlled for differences in work demands and work stress, some prospective studies have found a significant association between shift work and CVD (16–18). Shift work can act as a specific “circadian” psychosocial stress factor in several ways. First, shift work may increase psy-chosocial stress due to inflexibly organized shifts that leave limited possibilities for employees to influence their working hours. Second, shift work is described as comprising “unsocial” working hours since it may decrease the work–life balance due to possible vari-ability and/or unsocial timing of leisure time. Finally, shift work may increase the perception of insufficient recovery from work. Shift work and work stressIn relation to the job strain model (19), shift work has been associated with lower job control compared to day work, while work demands and social support do not seem to differ (15, 20, 21). Based on a random sample of Danish employees, conflicts at work and low decision latitude were higher among all groups of shift com-pared to day workers (15). Differences in work stress between shift and day workers vary between occupa-tions, but there may also be differences within occupa-tions. In eldercare, for example, women in fixed non-day Figure 1. Model for pathways from shift work to cardiovascular disease.Figure 1. Model for pathways from shift work to coronary heart disease.SHIFT WORKcircadian stressPSYCHOSOCIALSTRESS• work stress• work-lifebalance• recovery fromworkOTHER DISEASE CONDITIONS• atherosclerosis• metabolic syndrome• type II diabetesPHYSIOLOGICALSTRESS• inflammation• blood coagulation• cardiac autonomicfunction• HPA-axis• blood pressureBEHAVIORAL STRESS• sleep quality andlength• smoking• nutrition• weight gain• physical inactivityCardiovascular disease

Page 3

98?Scand?J?Work?Environ?Health?2010,?vol?36,?no?2Shift?work?–?cardiovascular?disease?pathwaysshifts were more often exposed to low job control and decreased support from supervisors and had a higher risk of physical and psychological violence (22). Karasek’s job control factor does not include work-time control or control over work scheduling. However, perceived con-trol over working hours, which has been shown to pre-dict decreased sickness absence and a good subjective health (23), correlates highly with job control (24).Another commonly used work stress model, the effort–reward imbalance model of Siegrist et al (25) focuses on a person’s perception of the balance between his or her efforts at work and the rewards received. The different aspects of working hours are not directly cov-ered by the model, but both indicators of effort–reward imbalance (ie, a need for control and approval and unfa-vorable effort–reward ratio) are more prevalent among shift than day workers (17). However, in addition to the suggested mediating effects of effort–reward imbalance at work for CVD risk factors, including hypertension and atherogenic lipids, shift work has also direct effects on these risk factors (17).Shift work, work–life balance, and recoveryShift work and irregular working hours can disturb the work–life balance. Even after adjustment for work stress, working in shifts decreases the perceived balance between work and social life (26–29). For example, compared to day work, baseline shift work was associ-ated with higher work–home interference over time in the Maastricht cohort study (28).A good work–life balance means an appropriate mixture of work and recovery. A high need for recovery predicted an increased incidence of self-reported CVD in a 2.5-year follow-up among healthy employees at baseline (30). Similarly, employees who seldom recov-ered from work during free weekends had an elevated risk of death due to heart disease even after controlling for age, gender, and 16 risk factors, including fatigue, lack of energy, and job stress (31). Shift work is related to a greater need for recovery (32, 33). Working hours define the time left for social activity and sleep that may be used for recovery either during the work (work breaks) or afterwards (leisure time). Based on this, the effort–recovery stress model (34) suggests that the nega-tive consequences of work hours on health depend on the possibilities for recovery during and after work.In conclusion, shift work may induce psychosocial stress through (i) greater difficulties to control personal working hours, (ii) decreased work–life balance, and (iii) insufficient recovery. Although the basic differences in work stress between day and shift workers may at least partly mediate the association between shift work and the risk of heart disease, shift work also includes specific psychosocial stress factors relevant for CVD.Behavioral stress as a pathwayShift work is associated with circadian disruption that also affects behavior. One of the most notable changes can be observed in sleep–wake patterns; from time to time, the main sleep period is temporally displaced and the worker suffers from sleep debt, insomnia, and/or excessive sleep-iness. This is most notable in night shifts but also seen in early-morning and late-evening shifts. Other aspects of behavior which may change are smoking, consumption of alcohol, dietary intake, and physical exercise.Sleep quality and length Epidemiologic studies since the 1960s have shown that sleep duration is associated with a risk of mortality. The association is U-shaped, with the lowest risk in those sleeping 7 hours (about the average length in the general population). In a recent meta-analysis (35), the pooled relative risk (based on 16 studies with sufficient data) for all-cause mortality for short sleep duration (<7 hours) was significantly increased (10% higher compared to those sleeping 7–8 hours). However, cardiovascular-related mortality was non-significantly increased (6%). Sleepiness is over-represented in shift/night workers. In many studies, a majority of shift workers admit to having experienced involuntary sleep on the night shift, whereas this is rare in day-oriented shifts (36). Insuf-ficient sleep and sleepiness activate the sympathetic nervous system and lead to increases in blood pressure and heart rate (37). A study among young, healthy indi-viduals found that only 6 consecutive nights of bedtime restricted to 4 hours per night increased the activity of the sympathetic nervous system and evening cortisol concentrations and decreased glucose tolerance (38). On the other hand, sleep deprivation increases hunger and decreases leptin, a factor inhibiting hunger (39). Experi-mental short-term sleep deprivation also increases the peripheral circulation of leukocytes, interleukins, and C-reactive protein, the last of which is a predictor of the risk of stroke and myocardial infarction (40–42). Shortened or disturbed sleep is among the most com-mon health-related effects of shift work (43, 44). The effects on sleep length depend on whether the shifts are permanent or rotating, in the latter case the speed and direction of rotation have an impact. In a meta-analytic review, based on 36 primary studies, Pilcher et al (45) concluded that permanent night shifts result in a decrease in the length of sleep (mean 6.6 hours), whereas perma-nent evening shifts result in an increase (mean 7.6 hours). Furthermore, the shifts within rotating schedules followed the same pattern (mean night 5.9 and evening 8.0 hours), with the addition of morning shifts having a moderate detrimental effect on sleep length (mean 6.6 hours).

Page 4

?Scand?J?Work?Environ?Health?2010,?vol?36,?no?2?99Puttonen?et?alThe International Classification of Sleep Disorders (46) includes criteria for “shift work sleep disorder”. In one of the few epidemiological studies on this subject, 8% of shift workers and 14% of nighttime workers were found to suffer from the disorder (47). Still, shift work does not appear to be a major source of insomnia and the level of sleep complaints bear no resemblance to those seen in insomniac patients (36). This shift work sleep disorder study showed very few differences between shift and day workers; only “too little sleep” and “nodding off at work” were higher among shift compared to day workers.SmokingThe association between smoking and shift work has been the subject of much debate. Many studies have shown that smoking is more prevalent among shift than daytime workers, but most studies have been cross- sectional or queried about smoking only once. Bøggild & Knutsson (1) concluded that, in seven “positive” studies (out of 13), the excess prevalence of smok-ing was 10–40%. The systematic review of Frost et al (3) was based on 14 studies, of which six reported on smoking and found that it was generally more frequent among shift workers. In recent studies with information on smoking, results have been mixed, indicating either no increase (48), a slight increase [3.9% (49) and about 10% (50)], or a significant increase (7) of smoking among shift workers. It has also been suggested that smoking should be regarded as a mediator of CVD, as it may be a way ofCVD, as it may be a way ofstaying awake during the night shift and, therefore, could be regarded as a causal chain variable (51). Pre-employment smoking has been controlled for only in two case–control studies (3). A two-year follow-up study showed a significantly increased risk (46%) of starting smoking among shift compared to day work-ers (52). In a one year follow-up study, shift work was quite strongly associated both with smoking status and starting to smoke at a later date; it was concluded that smoking status should not solely be treated as a mediator but also considered a confounder (53)., as it may be a way of NutritionThere have been some studies on dietary changes in association with shift work. In a Swedish study, Lenne-rnäs et al (54) found that working two and three shifts affected the circadian distribution of food and coffee consumption but not the overall 24-hour consumption. In a Japanese study (55), there were no significant dif-ferences in nutrient intake between fixed daytime and non-night shift workers. On the other hand, energy intake was highest during the night shift particularly among middle-aged workers. Studies assessing lipids in shift workers have had vari-able results. Of 16 studies, 5 showed increased cholesterol levels; 3 of these were prospective studies (1). In a fol-low-up study by Morikawa et al (56), the increases in total cholesterol were similar among day and shift workers. On the contrary, a methodologically similar 14-year fol-low-up study found a higher increase in total cholesterol among Japanese shift workers (57). In an Italian male cohort with repeated health examinations, night work-ers had significantly higher total cholesterol than their daytime colleagues (58). Regarding triglycerides, higher values were found among shift workers in 4 of 12 studies (1). Similarly, more recent studies have shown variable results [no difference (59) or elevated (60)].Weight gainShift work may also influence weight gain through reduced sleep. A meta-analysis of 26 cross-sectional studies indicated an increased obesity among those with shorter sleep times (mostly ≤5 hours (61). However, in their critical review (62), Marshall and colleagues concluded that it was unclear from the available adult epidemiological literature if short sleep and obesity or weight gain are associated. Some studies have indicated that starting shift work may be related to gains in body weight (3). Suwazono et al (63) reported a significantly increased risk (1.14) of ≥5% weight gain among shift compared to daytime workers. Similarly, Morikawa et al (56) found a significant increase in body mass index (around 1 kg/m2) among those working continuously in shifts and those changing from daytime to shift work. In the aforementioned Italian male cohort with repeated health examinations, night workers had significantly higher body mass index than daytime workers (58). Other behavioral aspectsThere are no consistent results on differences in alcohol consumption or exercise between shift workers and the general population (1). Recent studies have shown no significant difference in either case among men (7, 49); among women, a significant decrease in physical activ-ity and a non-significant decrease in alcohol consump-tion have been reported (7).Physiological stress and reactions as a pathwayIn order to establish a causal relation between shift work and CVD, we need to point out the specific underlying physiological and biological mechanisms that influence the disease process at different phases. We have summed up the results of studies using established independent

Page 5

100? Scand?J?Work?Environ?Health?2010,?vol?36,?no?2Shift?work?–?cardiovascular?disease?pathwaysbiochemical or physiological risk factors of CVD but also incorporated studies using other suggested markers. By doing this, we have provided a more comprehensive picture of the evidence and can point to the need for further research. The examined mechanisms and risk factors of CVD range from inflammation, blood coagu-lation, physiological and biological stress mediators (autonomic nervous system and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, which control the body’s levels of cortisol and catecholamine), and blood pressure to disease condi-tions such as hypertension and type II diabetes. InflammationInflammation plays a critical role in the atherosclerotic process, all stages of atheroma formation, and CHD (64). Several markers of inflammation have been associ-ated with CVD risk. However, only a small number of studies have tested whether the mechanism is active in the observed shift work–CVD association. High sensi-tive C-reactive protein, leucosyte count, lymphosyte, and NK-cell activity have received some interest in shift work studies. Sookoian et al (60) and Nishitani et al (65) reported an increased leucocyte count among rotating shift compared to daytime workers. In addition, 3-shift work has been associated with reduced T-lymphosyte function (66, 67). In more recent studies, NK-cell activ-ity was lower among shift compared to daytime workers; among shift workers, activity was also lower during night as compared to day shifts (68, 69).Homocysteiene and blood coagulationPlasma homocysteine is an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis and CVD (70) and potentially influences several risk mechanisms of CVD, including endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and atherogenic inflam-mation (71). At least three cross-sectional studies have examined the association between homocysteine and shift work. Homocysteine levels have been reported to be increased in shift work, but no difference has been found in the prevalence of hyperhomocystein-emia [defined as levels exceeding the normal value (>15 mmol/l)] (72, 73). The level of homocysteine was found to be almost twice as high among male shift com-pared to day workers (73), while another study reported significantly increased levels only for older shift work-ing men with sleep complaints (74). The current evi-dence suggests that there may be some association between shift work and homocysteine, but the evidence is thin and far from conclusive. The same holds true for microalbuminuria, which is a risk marker for arterial thromboembolism (75) and a predictor of CVD mortality and cardiac events (76). The association between shift work and albumin excretion has been examined in one study, suggesting that shift workers may have increased excretion compared to day workers (77). Similar levels of fibrinogen among day and shift workers have been reported (78), while another study on plasminogen acti-vator and tissue plasminogen activator inhibitor showed lower fluctuations among those working shifts both dur-ing the day and night, suggesting some deficiency in the diurnal variation of blood coagulability (79). Cardiac autonomic functionShift work may influence acutely autonomic function, increasing cardiac sympathetic and decreasing para-sympathetic activity during work and sleep following a work period. Over 15 studies using field measures have reported lower levels of parasympathetic modula-tion of heart rate variability or increased sympathetic activity in shift work (for example 68, 80–84). Others have reported that nighttime work is associated with reduced cardiac sympathetic modulation (81). Shift work may predispose individuals also to prolongation of QT intervals corrected for heart rate (QTc) (85), indicating a possible pro-arrhythmic potential of shift work. Indeed, a follow-up study of employees starting their work indicated that shift workers had increased frequency of ventricular extrasystoles, which correlated with the number of nights worked (86).Cortisol and catecholamine There is relatively little evidence supporting the hypoth-esis that cortisol would be directly associated with the development of CVD. However, cortisol and catechol-amines may influence stress-induced heart disease (87). Studies have demonstrated that shift work may acutely alter the regulation of cortisol (83, 88–91). Typically, studies have explored how cortisol secretion alters dur-ing shift work and cortisol measures have been used as an indicator of adaptation to shift work, rather than as a possible health risk factor as such. We could not find any studies on the possible enduring effects of shift work on cortisol secretion. Disturbed cortisol secretion and/or altered timing may influence health risk factors such as the development of central obesity. Little is known about the relation between shift work and catecholamines. The simulated shift work study of Boucsein et al (92) found that adrenalin and noradrena-lin excretion rates were significantly higher under day compared to night shifts, and lower during sleep com-pared to work. In the study of Theorell et al (93), clear fluctuations in the diurnal pattern of catecholamine excretion during and after night work were observed. Catecholamine secretion shows a distinct circadian variation and the timing of sample collection is critical in shift work studies. Therefore, it is possible that the

Page 6

?Scand?J?Work?Environ?Health?2010,?vol?36,?no?2?101Puttonen?et?alobserved changes in catecholamine levels may reflect the circadian phase differences, which makes it difficult to interpret the findings in many cases.Atherosclerosis and other preceding disease conditionsAtherosclerosis. Up to now, two studies have explored the association of shift work with the atherosclerotic process. These studies have used ultrasonic measures to estimate the level of subclinical atherosclerosis of the carotid intima media. Haupt and colleagues (6) reported an increased risk among shift workers in a sample of participants ≥45 years. A similar positive association for males was found in a study focusing on younger day and shift workers (24–39 years old) (7). Endothelial dysfunction is an early finding and marker in the development of atherosclerosis. Brachial artery endothelial function was acutely reduced after a 24-hour shift (94). The greatest decrease in flow-medi-ated dilation was observed among participants with a longer history of night shift duty.Type II diabetes. At least six studies have looked at the association between shift work and diabetes (95–100). Five of them have been cohort studies of type II diabetes incidence with follow-up periods ranging from 4–10 years; one study is on the mortality risk due to diabetes. Two reports of the nurses’ health study (95, 96), with partially overlapping data, concluded that shift work predicts a higher incidence of type II diabetes, with an increasing risk as a function of exposure to irregular working hours; the study also found that obesity may mediate the effect of shift work on diabetes risk. A Swedish study with male participants found a positive association between the number of years worked in shifts and mortality due to diabetes (97), while Kawakami et al (98) did not find any significant excess risk of incidence of diabetes in shift work. Two studies that used glycated hemoglobin and/or medication as the indicator of diabe-tes status, reported both a non-significant trend towards an increased risk (99) and an increased multivariate risk of diabetes in shift work (100). Metabolic syndrome (MetS). MetS, a risk factor of CVD, is a clustering of cardiac health risk factors such as insulin resistance, hypertension, cholesterol abnormali-ties, and central obesity (101). Existing cross-sectional studies have either looked at the association between shift work and components of the MetS (58, 59, 102, 103) or the prevalence of MetS according to a standard formulation of the syndrome (60, 104). A general con-clusion of the studies is that shift work has relatively consistent associations with individual risk factors of MetS and perhaps a more consistent association when the syndrome is considered as a whole. In addition, recent prospective cohort studies that used international formulations of the MetS have added to this evidence by showing that shift work increases the risk of incidence of MetS. In these studies, the relative risk in shift work has varied from 1.5–5.0 (105, 106, 107) suggesting a causal relationship between night shift work and the develop-ment of MetS. International formulations – such as those of the National Cholesterol Education Program’s Adult National Cholesterol Education Program’s Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III), the International (NCEP-ATP III), the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), and the European �roup forthe study of Insulin Resistance (E�IR) – use differentcriteria for defining MetS. This may also have some impact on the findings. For example, Esquirol et al (104) used both the NCEP-ATPIII and IDF criteria and reported that shift work was associated with NCEP-ATPIII MetS but not with IDF MetS, a formulation which emphasizes more abdominal obesity. The compa-rability between studies would be facilitated if standard and multiple definitions of MetS were used. European �roup for (E�IR) – use different Blood pressure and hypertension. Studies have examined the role of shift work in resting blood pressure levels and daily blood pressure in field circumstances, and whether shift work may influence the circadian profile of blood pressure. Cross-sectional epidemiological studies do not suggest a significant association between shift work and blood pressure. Studies have reported similar levels of blood pressure in shift and day workers (58, 59, 85, 104, 108), while in some studies the former have had significantly higher blood pressure levels than day work-ers (60, 109). When changes in blood pressure levels are considered, a fairly similar picture emerges: some longitudinal studies have suggested that rotating shift work is a risk factor for an increase in blood pressure (110, 111), while others have found no effect of shift work on blood pressure increment (56, 112, 113).Hypertension has been found to be more prevalent among shift compared to day workers (114) or among shift workers only in a certain age group (40–49 years old) (103). In the study by Morikawa et al (115), a higher risk of incident hypertension among shift workers was evident only in younger participants, while among the older participants a high risk of hypertension was found for those who changed from shift to day work during the follow-up. Furthermore, longer exposure to shift work has been reported to predict the onset of hypertension among males >30 years old (102); in the same study, shift work was suggested to be associated inversely with hypertension among young women <30 years of age. Finally, shift work has been shown to predict the onset of hypertension among male workers (116) as well as the progression from mild-to-severe hypertension (117).Shift work may exert transient and long-term effects on circadian blood pressure control seen as the change from a “dipping” to “non-dipping” pattern in which the

Page 7

102?Scand?J?Work?Environ?Health?2010,?vol?36,?no?2Shift?work?–?cardiovascular?disease?pathwaysnormally observed nocturnal decrease in blood pressure during sleep is impaired. In a study by Yamasaki et al (118), shift workers had a smaller drop in the systolic blood pressure during sleep than day workers, and they were more often categorized as “non-dippers”. Shift work has also been associated with higher 24-hour blood pressure levels (119, 120), while the risk of non-dipper status yielded mixed results. The mean systolic blood pressure during a 24-hour measurement has been found to be higher among shift than day workers (110). In a 24-hour monitoring study (121), blood pressure was higher during daytime sleep than sleep that occurred at night, a finding that may point to non-dipping phenom-ena but may also reflect the circadian variation of blood pressure. Kitamura et al (122) reported a transient effect of shift work on dipping at the beginning of night shift work. This was reversed to a dipping pattern after four days of work. The reviewed data showed mixed results for blood pressure levels and longitudinal increases in blood pres-sure in shift work. There appears to be limited evidence suggesting that shift work may acutely increase 24-hour blood pressure and have transient and long-term effects on dipper-status. In addition, whether shift work can increase the risk of hypertension needs to clarifed in additional follow-up studies. If shift workers, however, develop higher systolic blood pressure levels than day workers, it entails a high CHD risk (113). In the future, the role of treatment of hypertension should also be better taken into account. We do not know, for example, about the possible effects of blood pressure medica-tion in many of the previous studies. Moreover, it is recommended to treat the use of such medication as an outcome measure in shift work studies, as is currently being done in studies of MetS risk. DiscussionDuring the last two decades, a high number of epide-miologic studies have investigated the evidence on the relationship between shift work and CVD. Although epidemiologic data have grown, the lack of evidence-based mechanisms from shift work to CVD has made the interpretation and analysis of such data difficult. The present evidence points to several possible pathways from shift work to CVD. Although evidence on the strength of any individual mechanism is still limited, the number of studies on different pathways has been increasing relatively fast during the last ten years. Also, studies on essential mechanisms such as atheroscle-rotic process have gained support (6, 7). Several of the biomarkers related to shift work are also related to the atherosclerotic process: inflammation, increased blood cholesterol, homocystein, and albumin levels, in addi-tion to the possible deficiencies in endothelial function and blood coagulation. The mechanisms by which shift work could be a risk factor for CVD range from the effect of varying working hours to the circadian body functions, but shift work also interferes with the social and domestic life. Besides changing the rhythm of work, shift work changes simultaneously the behavioral rhythms in sleep, activity, and nutrition. We therefore conclude that there is sufficient evidence for possible disease mechanisms from shift work to CVD, but strong evi-dence on any specific plausible mechanism is missing. Shift work could increase the risk of CVD by several psychosocial, behavioral, and physiological mecha-nisms. The different pathways are interrelated and may also lead to other metabolic diseases by increasing the risk for atherosclerosis, metabolic syndrome, and type II diabetes. There are several reasons for preferring a narrative as opposed to systematic review. First, the area covered by our review is large and the relevant mechanisms include dozens of variables to be evaluated. Second, many of the variables have been little studied and methodologi-cally good studies are quite scarce (eg, long follow-up studies with large populations and adequate control of confounders). Third, probably largely because of variable methodology, the results of different studies are often contradictory. Consequently, we have chosen the narrative form and tried to emphasize the results of methodologically strong studies.Psychosocial stressWe conclude that there is evidence that shift work can induce psychosocial circadian stress due to a lack of control over working hours, problems in the work–life balance, and decreases in perceived recovery. It is obvi-ous that shift systems vary according to their psychoso-cial effects, with some shift systems suiting even better to personal time constraints than others. Job control is a key element of work stress in several stress concepts. Since both job control and the perception of sufficient recovery after work are independently related with CVD (12–14, 31), it is quite possible that shift work could increase the risk for CVD through its psychosocial stress mechanism.Poor job control, work–life imbalance, and insuffi-cient recovery can further induce behavioral and physi-ological stress reactions. Due to psychosocial stress factors, shift workers may sleep less, start smoking, and develop unhealthy eating habits. Psychosocial and behavioral stress could trigger the physiological stress reactions linking the psychosocial stress to the patho-physiological mechanisms of CVD.

Page 8

?Scand?J?Work?Environ?Health?2010,?vol?36,?no?2?103Puttonen?et?alBehavioral stressBoth short sleep and insomnia have been reported to increase the risk for CVD (123, 124). Although sleep-ing <7 hours is related to the risk of total mortality, this does not seem to be mediated through CVD (35). It is possible that the mean sleep length of shift workers is not significantly reduced over a longer period. The sleep problems among shift workers also seem to be milder than among insomniacs (36, 125). �enerally, sleep qual-ity is not an independent risk factor of a health outcome (risk of mortality) if sleep length is taken into account (126). So far, there is limited evidence to support the view that reduced quantity or quality of sleep (per se) would be a major pathway to affect the risk of CVD in shift work, but they might contribute to adverse physi-ologic changes via intermittent excessive sleepiness.There is evidence to suggest that smoking is more prevalent among shift than daytime workers, and if this is confirmed in future studies this could be one possible pathway affecting CVD risk. The situation is similar regarding serum lipids. There is more evidence on the risk of weight gain among shift workers, and at present this seems to be the most verified of the possible behav-ioral pathways from shift work to CVD.Physiological stress reactionsCVD develops over a long period with physical changes beginning decades before the disease manifests itself; some of the health hazards of shift work may remain undetected when a disease condition is used as an end-point, as employees may, for example, change to day work when the first symptoms of CVD occur. Therefore it is important to focus on the mechanisms of the sub-clinical phase. When summing up the evidence on the findings of biological and physiological risk factors in the shift work–CVD association, several conclusions arise. Look-ing at studies using the reviewed individual biological or physiological risk factors of CVD, it is clear that none of these possible mechanisms receive strong sup-port at the moment. This is partially due to the fact that biological markers of immune function, blood coagula-tion, and oxidative stress have been rarely studied. One reason for the low number of epidemiologic studies is that the data have been obtained from regular physical health check-ups with standard sets of measures. There are, however, studies (usually with smaller numbers of participants) providing important additional knowl-edge on new biological and physiological risk factors. Regarding individual factors, there is some evidence suggesting that inflammation may serve as a pathophysi-ological pathway. Also homocysteine has received some evidence. The main stress mediators, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and autonomic nervous system, have been widely studied with regard to shift work. These studies have concluded that shift work has acute effects on the stress mediators’ levels and diurnal varia-tion, thus potentially increasing harmful allostatic load. However, this evidence is only indirect, and we could not find any studies on longitudinal effects. In future, it would be important to study the effects of shift work on, for example, cortisol and heart rate variability in population cohorts. Several cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have tested whether blood pressure and hypertension would serve as a mediating risk factor. The findings of cross-sectional studies have yielded mixed results, which is not very surprising considering the known problems in shift work research. Follow-up studies suggest that there may be some increment of risk related to shift work, but whether this is a true effect remains to be clarified in future studies. Subclinical atherosclerosis has been studied in two large cohorts. These studies showing an increased risk in shift workers did not have follow-up on atherosclerosis and thus longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the association. Recently a relatively high number of shift work studies have focused on MetS and type II diabetes, and the current data suggests that shift work is a probable risk factor for both. Although a number of longitudinal studies have been published, it still is premature to make firm conclusions and future studies should use established definitions of conditions to ensure better comparability between studies.Concluding remarks and need for further researchThis narrative review has examined the psychosocial, behavioral, and physiological mechanisms by which shift work could be a risk factor for CVD and concludes that there is sufficient evidence for possible disease pathways – although strong evidence on any specific plausible mechanism is so far missing. These pathways are interrelated and may lead to other cardiovascular and metabolic diseases by increasing the risk for atheroscle-rosis, metabolic syndrome, and type II diabetes.In general, there are numerous methodological chal-lenges in studying the possible mechanisms of the shift work–CVD relationship. First, there are aspects related to shift work, such as how to define it? Which shift characteristics or ways to organize working hours are essential to health effects, and how can exposure to these be reliably measured? Second, there are problems in the assessment of the possible effects of selection (“healthy worker effect”): are those starting shift work and espe-cially those staying in it for longer times healthier and/or do they have a higher tolerance for factors affecting health? It would also be important to have information on workers who change the working time model during

Page 9

104?Scand?J?Work?Environ?Health?2010,?vol?36,?no?2Shift?work?–?cardiovascular?disease?pathwaysfollow-up. �ood shift work research faces new chal-lenges resulting from the transition from traditional, lifelong, shift work jobs (mainly related to industrial processes) to flexible, often temporary employment that has grown increasingly during the last decades. In such settings, it is difficult to maintain control over large populations for sufficiently long periods of follow-up to gain accurate exposure data (ie, years of shift work). Changes in shift systems may thus modify the con-clusions on the relevance of different CVD mechanisms. In a systematic review, Driscoll et al (127) found support for the use of forward-rotating shift systems for physi-ological functions. Changing the backward-rotating shift system to rapidly forward-rotating has been shown to have a favorable effect on blood pressure (128), sug-gesting that certain features of the shift systems can be critical regarding their health effects. Similarly, increased ergonomic scheduling with a more regular and predictable shift schedule was found to be associated with favorable changes in triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (129).As concluded by Frost et al (3), there is still limited evidence for a causal relationship between shift work and ischemic heart disease. To demonstrate causality, we also need studies on mechanisms. We need more prospective studies with large representative popula-tions, good descriptions of the working hours used, long follow-ups, and reliable measurements of the psychoso-cial and behavioral stress factors and health outcomes, as well the use of new physiological biomarkers. In an ideal study setting, the participant would be recruited to the study before entering irregular work. This is seldom possible, but research could focus on the “natural inter-vention” and study the physiological and behavioral effects of entering and leaving irregular work. The role of shift work sleep disturbance in the pathway from shift work to CVD should be investigated. In order to evalu-ate the role and extent of sleep disturbance, objective measures of sleep in addition to the objective measures of other biomarkers of shift work are needed.References 1. Bøggild H, Knutsson A. Shift work, risk factors and cardiovascular disease [review]. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999;25(2):85–99. 2. Kristensen TS. Cardiovascular diseases and the work environment. A critical review of the epidemiologic literature on nonchemical factors. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1989;15:165–79. 3. Frost P, Kolstad HA, Bonde JP. Shift work and the risk of ischemic heart disease – a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009;35(3):163–79. 4. Virkkunen H, Härmä M, Kauppinen T, Tenkanen L. The triad of shift work, occupational noise, and physical workload and risk of coronary heart disease. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63:378–86. 5. Bøggild H. Settling the question – the next review on shift work and heart disease in 2019 [editorial]. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009;35(3):157–61. 6. Haupt CM, Alte D, Dorr M, Robinson DM, Felix SB, John U, et al. The relation of exposure to shift work with atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction in a general population. Atherosclerosis. 2008;201:205–11. 7. Puttonen S, Kivimäki M, Elovainio M, Pulkki-Råback L, Hintsanen M, Vahtera J, et al. Shift work in young adults and carotid artery intima-media thickness: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns study. Atherosclerosis. 2009;205:608–13. 8. Knauth P. Categories and parameters of shiftwork systems. In: Colquhoun PW, Costa �, Folkard S, Knauth P, editors. Shiftwork: problems and solutions. Frankfurt (�ermany): Peter Lang, Europaischer Verlag der Wissenschaften; 1996. p 17–28. 9. World Health Organization (WHO). Prevention of cardiovascular disease: guidelines for assessment and management of total cardiovascular risk. �eneva (Switzerland): WHO press; 2007.10. Härmä M, Kompier MA, Vahtera J. Work-related stress and health – risks, mechanisms and countermeasures [editorial]. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(6):413–9.11. Pollitt RA, Rose KM, Kaufman JS. Evaluating the evidence for models of life course socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2005;5:7.12. Kivimäki M, Virtanen M, Elovainio M, Kouvonen A, Väänänen A, Vahtera J. Work stress in the etiology of coronary heart disease – a meta-analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(6):431–42.13. Bonde JP, Munch-Hansen T, Agerbo E, Suadicani P, Wieclaw J, Westergaard-Nielsen N. Job strain and ischemic heart disease: a prospective study using a new approach for exposure assessment. J Occup Environ Med. 2009;51:732–8.14. Eller NH, Netterstrøm B, �yntelberg F, Kristensen TS, Nielsen F, Steptoe A, et al. Work-related psychosocial factors and the development of ischemic heart disease: a systematic review. Cardiol Rev. 2009;17:83–97.15. Bøggild H, Burr H, Tüchsen F, Jeppesen HJ. Work environment of Danish shift and day workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001;27(2):97–105.16. Knutsson A, Hallquist J, Reuterwall C, Theorell T, Åkerstedt T. Shiftwork and myocardial infarction: a case-control study. Occup Environ Med. 1999;56:46–50.17. Peter R, Alfredsson L, Knutsson A, Siegrist J, Westerholm P. Does a stressful psychosocial work environment mediate the effects of shift work on cardiovascular risk factors? Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999;25(4):376–81.18. Virtanen SV, Notkola V. Socioeconomic inequalities in cardiovascular mortality and the role of work: a register study of Finnish men. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:614–21.