A letter from bin Laden? Conviniently suggesting to the US to ask about him and/or the Muslim World: „Why did they attack us in New York and Washington?“

Anybody who has seriously dealt with Nine Eleven knows it was an Inside Job! I tried to comment on that post – all my comments otherwise go without problem – but the one on this post didn´t get anywhere:

Thus I decided to post my planned comment as an OPEN LETTER to ICH:

„Don´t you see that this is a fabrication to back the cover up of Nine Eleven as an Inside Job?

Inside this „letter“ bin Laden supposedly urges the US to ask themselves: „Why did they attack us in New York and Washington?“ The letter is mixed with a lot of rightfully Anti-Imperialist positions, to which many critical People would agree. This “letter” shouldn´t befuddle us.

Nine Eleven was an Inside Job, there can be no doubt anymore. It gave massive blackmail power to Israel´s Power Elite as far a Middle East policy is concerned, since they had everything done by the Neocons „on the Screen“. Stop dwelling on „Bin Laden´s letter“ or the „28 pages“. All meant to make the „official narrative“ more plausible!“

Or is it possible that ICH´s page has been hacked and this was inserted? I see that „letter“ as another „line of defense“ to cover up the Inside Job!

Many good reports and articles have been made and written about Nine Eleven showing clearly that the official narrative about the terrible event is a hoax from A to Z. Here is a brilliant compilation of many, many aspects of the tragedy which has rightfully to be called an Inside JOB:

Interestingly there are often disturbances with the video. You´ll have to recover the site and go to the part where the film stopped. I can hardly believe the disturbances are accidental! Don´t let that frustrate you, it´s worth watching till the end.

But nothing is perfect and a few important points are missing

There is the question of the preknowledge in stockmarket Transactions:

Nine Eleven was the fake „justification“ of the „War on Terror“ which is in deed a Terror war on the world and on civil rights. The more one knows the easier it is to make people aware of the bloody hoax claiming to many victims!

In connection with Nine Eleven an important argument of people like me, rejecting the official narrative about the event, was that no steel framed construction has ever collapsed just because of a fire, like the famous Building 7 supposedly did. On the 17th of January a 17 storey building in Teheran, the Plasco_Building, has collapsed after a heavy fire. Even something like a pyroclastic stream is to be seen on video. Are we now proven wrong?

Well, apart from the fact that the building was collapsing less symetric than WTC 7 in fact did, apart from the fact that the rubble pile of the building is almost as high as the rubble of the Nine Eleven buildings, the case smells from a fabrication. “Uuuh, another “conspiracy theory” from that guy”, some people might yell. I advise those people to watch the video about this collapse properly. Watching properly one can in all clearness see the explosions propping downwards before the collapse:

“But this was in Iran”, the “debunkers” would yell again. “So what?!”, would I answer. Don´t forget, last Summer former CIA_director_Morell, a staunch Clinton supporter, demanded to kill Russians and Iranians in covert operations on behalf of Russia´s and Iran´s support for Assad. Morell demanded that US involvements should not be able to be proven, but it should be clear to the respective governments where it came from. As for Russia they might have got “their part” with the plane_crash in December.

Was the building collapse the “Iranian Part”, “smashing several flies with one hand”? The case is very symbolic, on first sight already it resembles Nine Eleven: fire and a collapse following. Quite some skepticism on “official” Nine Eleven also came from Iranian media. The Iranian government would “understand”.

But the case could also serve for the “necessary debunking” of those many peoples conviction (inside and outside the US) that Nine Eleven was an “Inside Job”! Do we really believe that such operation would be impossible for those guys having demolished thousands of Iranian Uranium centrifuges? Well, that was a “remote control affair”, but I´m sure, that US “intelligence” and their allies have many agents “on the ground” in Iran. The Iranian government would even hesitate (though clearly understanding, and possibly there were Companies in the building to be connected to it) to accuse the US of this incident, because it would be perceived as a fundamental weakness of the regime in Teheran.

There is another point: in these transition times the “Deep State” of the US is more free than otherwise (one might think of how the “Bay of Pigs” came over Kennedy after his Inauguration). And the Neocons were very eager to increase pressure on Iran, they were even eager to attack Iran, partly pushed by Israel´s Power Elite. Clinton was part of those efforts. Trump in deed also wants to revise the treaty with Iran. On the other side he announced to stop “Regime Change” wars, which are an obsession of the Neocons, Iran is in fact the last point on their “Hit List”, according to Wesley Clarke (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eo6u9DpASp8 ). So here might be the chance for the Neocons to push him exactly into another of such wars, especially if Iran´s government would react on such a provocation by a covert operation against the US in revenge.

And it could also be a demonstration of strength towards those critical people being able to think: “it´s clearly to be seen, but you better shut up! Otherwise we smash you!” (socially, economically or even physically).

Qui Bono?

Again: The explosion clouds show it was not just a fire that brought the building down!

If an event is of great advantage for someone, moreover in many different aspects, the question arises whether those ones benefitting from it have staged that event, one calls that possible motives. The next question is whether those people have the ability to do it. Who might really doubt that?! The remaining part: the proofs! It is characteristic of such covert operations that we, the resisting part of the population hardly have the chance to get them, but I claim to have the right to speculate on basis of the first two aspects of the Story.

Ok, one can not be sure of this interpretation, just as how Morell demanded!