Blog Comments & Posts

Yes, correct, rishil it was meant as a sacrcastic joke. Kinda like what I think of G... a joke...

Look folks, the point of my rant is that there is no 1+1=2 solution when it comes to G. Of course you need to optimize for G. However, G is so Goofy that the only "constant" there is with them, is... If you pay them, you will be at the front of the line... or, If you pay to be on a site like w3c with a PR 9-10 and you can have your Viagra link right next to Adobes link..... Now that's retarded.... IMHO, that should cause w3c to go down to about a PR 3 ......or If your like myspace and you get a couple million links, with or without G help, then G will pay you boat loads of cash to be your exclusive ads/search server.... Again, Goofy.... They (G) can talk about algorithms and filters all they want but I've (weekly) tracked a forum spammer that has almost as much PR (6) as this sites home page (7). and nearly as many links... Again... That's retarded... Wait, then G had the nerve to "Automatically" update our toolbars so that we can no longer see the # of the results as you type given keyword(s). Don't they call that spyware? Now, all the searches are getting on the whole "no auto link pop checker band wagon". You have sites like marketleap that have to stick a friggin post it note next to there link pop checker, stating that this no longer works for MSN.... You have broken link popularity tools scattered all over the web lately. It's out of control. I think I'm gonna start optimizing for "ask images" I mean really....lol

Yahoo, yep, plop a link anywhere and they will grab it. They pick up so much, it's almost freaky... You can say what you will about Yahoo but if you take away the links on yahoo for this site their link pop would be cut from 400,000+ to about 200,000. So basically half of this sites link pop comes form Yahoo. With G only showing a measly 2500... Again Goofy... and the "New" MSN live, forget about it. Their so whacked out that they don't even know what their own link pop is.....lol

Pretty much stated the obvious...... Needed to be said though... "SEO for G will make you nuts"

You can white hat link till your blue in the face and G is so retarded that for a certain keywords such as "Myspace codes", the results flip flop every day. One day there may be a PR 2 at the top of the results and the next a PR 6. This has gone on for some time now, back and forth, day in and day out. There's no clear cut leader for those keywords. Then on the other hand you take a keyword like "seo" and you can pretty much see the sites that have the top 10 "on lock". Day in and day out the same sites own the results. Such as wikipedia. or should I say wikistupidea... Not sure why G has anointed them the "grand wizard". There pretty much just a "click" based forum on steroids..

Then you spoke of linking to fast can hurt you etc. Doesn't look like myspace got penalized to much considering how fast they came up in the linking wars or wiki for that matter. So when it comes to rules, I think we can agree that there are none!!! What works for one doesn't always work for another. If anything remains true in the SEO "game" is that G is about as lame as the new MSN live.. Maybe worse.. and they hold webmasters financial futures in there hands. Kinda like Bush to our boys in Iraq.....

Spamming, yeah we all do it in one form or another, whether its paid links, articles or what have you. All I know is I've been watching 1 such spammer that has nearly as many links as this site (200,000+). Granted only about 300 are from G but once you get in that "link bracket", G has no choice but to recognize your site or ban you. The site I'm speaking of has been steadily rising for the past 2 years. So, surely someone would have reported his blatant acts by now. He has PR6, not greatest but not bad either..

Wanna see spam... Look at the "Generic Viagra" Link on the Supporters page of wc3.org(PR9).... One would think this would pull down wc3 rank... Naaa not gonna happen. Just goes to show you what $1000 will do for you...

Take this site.. Your showing 400,000+ links with only about 2500 from G. That's sad on the part of G. I would be pissed if I were you guys. The spammer almost has the same total links to G ratio as you guys...

Take one of my sites. We own the top 2 spots for a keyword in google images. Yeah that's right, Image optimization... Anyway, when you do a "web" search for that term. The results show the 3rd, 4th, and 5th pictures at the top of the "web" results. Our pic is no where to be found unless you click "images" ....

With all that said.... The one thing that remains constant is "Google is Sad". SEO for yahoo and you'll sleep better at night.