Ugh, working on too many coronene-related things at the same time. File:Coronene.svg is the other one on-topic here (not sure why we have so many ...200.svg variants of images, a general topic for some other time/venue). DMacks (talk) 20:16, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

All replaced (manually because of a sane-in-hindsight limitation of CommonsDelinker). DMacks (talk) 03:28, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Tagged almost 4 years ago for "Each seems to have at least 4 glycosidic links, most of which look the same compared among the images. The titles appear to intend to highlight the differences in one part of them, but not specifically marked which. Especially confusing because third has two different title-terms for two different parts of same image, and also there are untitled parts that would use same terminology." The image quality (size/resolution) is so poor that some atoms are almost overlapped, which is COM:EDUSE confusing if the whole goal is to illustrate different modes of bonding. If someone wanted it, would be easy enough to redraw these to MOS. [[Category::Beta-glucans‎ ]] has lot of nice speciic examples if all someone wants is a representative one. DMacks (talk) 17:48, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Geometrically incorrect: if this is the AlCl3 monomer, the three Cl should be symmetrically around the Al. In this image, it appears the two closest to the viewer are closer to each other and further from the back one. And the whole molecule should be planar, but it appears the back chlorine is above the Cl-Al-Cl plane of the rest. DMacks (talk) 16:05, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Ball-and-stick and calotte models absolutely need to have an accurate geometry and size of atoms. Otherwise, they are misleading like in this case. Hence, still Delete. --Leyo 22:21, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Ball-and-stick and calotte models absolutely need to have an accurate geometry and size of atoms. Otherwise, they are misleading like in this case. Hence, still Delete. --Leyo 22:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Ball-and-stick and calotte models absolutely need to have an accurate geometry and size of atoms. Otherwise, they are misleading like in this case. Hence, still Delete. --Leyo 22:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Ball-and-stick and calotte models absolutely need to have an accurate geometry and size of atoms. Otherwise, they are misleading like in this case. Hence, still Delete. --Leyo 22:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)