Dear Common Dreams Readers: Common Dreams is a small non-profit that exists only because of the support of our readers. No advertising; no paywalls: our content is free. But our costs are real. A free and independent press is essential to the health of a functioning democracy. Independent journalism and democracy itself have never been more fragile, more at risk than now. Without your support, we will not exist. Will you join again with those readers who have come forward to make sure Common Dreams has a future?Every donation makes a difference.

UCS Releases 23 Recommendations to Ensure Public Safety; Says Problems at U.S. Nuclear Plants Have Been Evident for Decades

WASHINGTON - The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) today released two dozen recommendations to ensure the safety and security of U.S. nuclear plants. Many of the recommendations address problems that have been evident for decades, while others address problems brought to light during the recent accident at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear facility.

A Fukushima-like crisis could happen at any one of the 104 nuclear reactors in the United States, said David Lochbaum, the director of UCS’s Nuclear Safety Project.

“Japan’s reactor designs are similar, their protective barriers are similar, and their regulations are, in some cases, even stronger,” said Lochbaum, who worked in the U.S. nuclear industry for 17 years before joining UCS. “If a U.S reactor were faced with a similar challenge, maybe not the exact combo of earthquake and tsunami, but some other natural disaster or human error, it’s unlikely that the story would have a happier ending.

“Fukushima should shake the Nuclear Regulatory Commission out of its complacency,” he added. “There are a number of actions the agency can and should take to make U.S. nuclear plants safer. They can start with our recommendations, many of which we’ve been making for years.”

Extend the scope of its regulations to include “severe,” or extreme, low-probability accidents. The agency’s regulations concentrate on so-called “design-basis” accidents—ones that U.S. reactors must be designed to withstand. Severe accidents can happen, but the NRC’s weak requirements and the industry’s voluntary severe accident guidelines are not enough to protect the public, especially when a significant number of plants do not pay attention to those guidelines. This recommendation encompasses the issue of “station blackout,” when a plant loses both off-site and on-site AC power to maintain cooling systems. (Recommendation #1)

Strengthen emergency planning requirements. The 10-mile-radius emergency planning zone around plants is not large enough to adequately protect all the people living near plants who may be at significant risk. (Recommendation #3)

Require plant owners to transfer spent fuel from storage pools to less-vulnerable dry casks after five years, when it is cool enough to remove from the pools. (Recommendation #4)

Force the owners of more than 40 reactors to comply with fire protection regulations, which the agency originally established in 1980 and amended in 2004. (Recommendation #7)

Apply the same requirements for timely action to plant safety as it does for business-related requests from plant owners. (Recommendation #8)

Require new reactors to be safer than currently operating reactors, most of which were built at least 30 years ago. (Recommendation #18)

Make the value of human life it uses in its analyses consistent with that of other government agencies, which are higher. That would force plant owners to add safety features that the NRC now considers too expensive because it underestimates the value of lives that could be saved. (Recommendation #20)

The NRC has planned a two-part response to the Japanese nuclear accident. Late yesterday, a post-Fukushima NRC-appointed task force delivered its 90-day report assessing the safety of the U.S. nuclear fleet to NRC commissioners, and the agency is scheduled to discuss the report publicly on July 19. The 90-day assessment will be followed by a more in-depth analysis.

UCS urges the NRC to require the nuclear industry to take prompt action to strengthen security and safety measures at U.S. reactors.

“The NRC’s response to emerging safety issues has been far too sluggish in the past,” said Edwin Lyman, a senior scientist in the UCS Global Security Program and a leading expert on nuclear plant design. “Nearly 10 years after the 9/11 attacks, U.S. nuclear plant owners still have not completed all NRC-mandated security upgrades because the agency kept granting them extensions. Unless the NRC moves more quickly and decisively to address the safety problems revealed by Fukushima, tens of millions of Americans who live near nuclear plants will continue to be at risk.”

###

The Union of Concerned Scientists is the leading science-based nonprofit working for a healthy environment and a safer world. UCS combines independent scientific research and citizen action to develop innovative, practical solutions and to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices.

Further

In the vile wake of Charlottesville - those sweaty young white men, pasty faces contorted, screaming, "Blood and Soil!" "Jews Will Not Replace Us!" "Fuck You Faggots!" - what to say? Just this: This is racism, domestic terrorism, pure hate. This is not who we are, and this is not ok. Most vital, those "whose pigmentation matches theirs" must speak "with unflinching clarity (or) we simply amen it... They need white faces speaking directly into their white faces, loudly on behalf of love."

Common Dreams brings you the news that matters.

Sign up for Newsletter

Connect With Us

X

Your Support Makes A Difference: Over 90% of the Common Dreams budget comes from reader support. We rely on you. Will you join again with those readers who have come forward to make sure Common Dreams has a future? We can't do it without you.