February 19, 2014

Artist's impression of Envisat. Credits: ESA

Physics students at the University of Leicester have pointed out that the huge observational satellite Envisat – which lost contact with Earth in 2012 – could potentially pose a threat similar to the events which plague Sandra Bullock in the Oscar-nominated sci-fi thriller Gravity.

What's more, the task of bringing the satellite back to Earth may be too costly and complex to be feasible, according to their final year paper for the Journal of Physics Special Topics, a peer-reviewed student journal run by the University's Department of Physics and Astronomy.

Envisat, an £1.8 billion, 9 metre-long behemoth, was launched by the European Space Agency (ESA) in 2002, and used ten sophisticated sensors to observe and monitor Earth's land, atmosphere, oceans and ice caps.

However, ESA lost contact with the satellite in April, 2012 – and declared the end of the mission soon after. The satellite now orbits the Earth free from human control at an altitude of 790km - where the amount of space debris around the planet is greatest.

This means there is a chance of collision with other satellites and debris during the 150 years it is expected to remain in space. Each year, two objects are expected to pass Envisat to within about 200m and other spacecraft have had to move out of Envisat's path.

It is possible – though unlikely - that a collision with Envisat could lead to a chain reaction effect, known as the Kessler Syndrome, where a cloud of fast-moving debris causes other collisions with orbiting bodies around the Earth.

This would not be good news for the many essential satellites and spacecraft in orbit. It could also make it difficult for future space missions to pass through the region of Envisat's altitude, if the region becomes congested with space debris.

The fourth-year MPhys students' paper, De-orbiting Envisat, suggests that around 140kg of fuel would be required to move the satellite to a point where it would naturally return to Earth within 25 years.

Based on the object's cross-sectional area and its mass, the students calculated that the satellite would need to be moved to an altitude of 700km from its current position in order to return to the planet in 25 years.

The students calculated that the energy required to move the satellite 90km closer to the Earth was 2.7 billion joules – equivalent to an extra 143.1kg of hydrazine fuel. This could be quite feasible, according to the students, if two of the craft's 80kg fuel tanks were replaced.

But actually getting this fuel to the satellite in orbit would be a pretty tall order due to the costs involved of such a mission – which has never been attempted for a satellite which wasn't designed to be refuelled.

An average satellite launch costs hundreds of millions of pounds – with each kilogram of the satellite's costing tens of thousands of pounds.

"In the film, the cloud of space debris is caused by a missile which was supposed to destroy a non-operational satellite and sparks the chain reaction which eventually collides with Clooney and Bullock's spacecraft. In real life this is very unlikely to happen," said physics student Katie Raymer, 22, from Whitstable.

"It is even more unlikely that ESA's Envisat could cause one of these chain reactions. However, each year two objects are expected to pass Envisat to within about 200m and other spacecraft have had to manoeuvre themselves out of Envisat's path. Also Envisat orbits at an altitude where the amount of debris is greatest. So although it is unlikely to happen, de-orbiting Envisat is certainly worth considering.

"Unfortunately, it would be very unlikely we could move Envisat to the right altitude due to how much it would cost. Envisat was not designed to be refuelled, so another method of de-orbiting Envisat may be a better option."

The students suggest it may be possible to use NASA's Robotic Refuelling Mission (RRM) which has been designed to refuel and repair non-operational satellites, but is still in its earliest stages of testing.

Professor George Fraser, Director of the University's Space Research Centre, commented: "The Special Projects paper highlights the huge area and mass of Envisat as the major risk factors for space debris. The fact that Envisat is in a near-polar orbit doesn't help either, since its path intersects most satellites' orbits nearly at right angles. Imagine driving down the motorway and every so often a large truck cuts right across all four lanes right in front of you!"

The team stressed that the calculations used in the paper should be taken as an estimate, as a full treatment would be very complicated and beyond the scope of a Journal of Physics Special Topics paper.

The Journal of Physics Special Topics is published every year, and features original short papers written by students in the final year of their four-year Master's of Physics degree.

Course tutor Dr Mervyn Roy, a lecturer in the University of Leicester's Department of Physics and Astronomy, said: "The aim of the module is for the students to learn about peer review and scientific publishing. The students are encouraged to be imaginative with their topics, and find ways to apply basic physics to the weird, the wonderful and the everyday."

Related Stories

Launched from Kourou in French Guiana on the night of 28 February 2002, ESA’s Envisat spacecraft marks its fifth year in space. Having orbited Earth more than 26 000 times, the world’s largest and most complex environmental ...

ESAs Earth-observing satellite Envisat has moved to a lower orbit in order to conserve fuel and extend its life by three years, and is once again delivering invaluable data to thousands of scientists.

Space may be big  vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big  but the space around Earth is beginning to get cluttered with space junk. This poses a threat, not only to other satellites, space stations and missions, ...

(Phys.org)—Space debris came into focus last week at the International Astronautical Congress in Naples, Italy. Envisat, ESA's largest Earth observation satellite, ended its mission last spring and was a subject of major ...

Since the birth of space flight in 1957, the number of man-made objects orbiting the Earth has grown every year. There are now more than 15,000 such objects larger than 10cm, at least those that we know of. Even very small ...

Recommended for you

What if I told you that recent experiments have revealed a revolutionary new method of propulsion that threatens to overthrow the laws of physics as we know them? That its inventor claims it could allow us to travel to the ...

The coalescence of two black holes—a very violent and exotic event—is one of the most sought-after observations of modern astronomy. But, as these mergers emit no light of any kind, finding such elusive events has been ...

The recent discovery of an Earth twin has boosted chances there is intelligent life on other planets. But while Pope Francis's telescope scans the starlit skies, the Vatican is sceptical of ever meeting Mr. Spock.

A dying star's final moments are captured in this image from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope. The death throes of this star may only last mere moments on a cosmological timescale, but this star's demise is still quite ...

I'm with drel, at least as it related to using another means to deorbit the satellite. There are a number of ideas being tested, and it seems to me that refueling the craft would be among the least likely of those options.

I'm with drel, at least as it related to using another means to deorbit the satellite. There are a number of ideas being tested, and it seems to me that refueling the craft would be among the least likely of those options.

Perhaps this could be another use for the asteroid capture hardware. Bag it and tag it. We could use it to haul a number of things of different shapes, weights, and sizes out of orbit.

Aha. To boost to high orbits, the rockets will have to provide short duration but powerful boost to send the (whatever) service/capturing bots to their destinations, to ensure the spent stages don't end up in long decay orbits that will contribute to the problem they try to solve. This smells of serious money, the space launch industry will love it. Ion engines are small, lightweight, long lasting, and use little fuel and associated hardware plumbings in comparison. There are no profits in promoting, making and selling stuff that are cheaper, usable a hell of a lot longer and having less leeway for cost overruns. Hell, this planet will definitely not get to the stars until money is no longer associated with science, technology and progress in general. The only other way is to have a global behemoth that control and own everything and everyone, so that it is so rich to afford philanthropy..how about it, Google???