We received one new affirmative and one of the
no voters changed their voteto affirmative. The one remaining no
vote was from the previous ballot andwas ruled then as not a valid
technical comment and made part of therecirculation. (copy below) There
has been no response from that voter.

Given that there are no new no
votes and no changes required to the draft,I will be making a motion to
the SEC, via a 10 day letter ballot, toforward Draft 9 to RevCom in
time for the May 2 submission deadline.

Comment received on Draft 8
and recirculated with Draft 9:

CommenterName CommentType CommentID
Clause Subclause Page LineO'Farrell, Timothy
T
8
D 89CommentThe source code of
Appendix D is provided without a flow diagram schematic.To enhance
understanding and accessibility of the program material a flowdiagram
schematic is required.SuggestedRemedyInclude a flow diagram schematic
of the source code presented in Appendix D.ResponseREJECT.The BRC
does not know of any requirements to supply a flow diagram for
code,therefore one will not be created and included. BRC does not consider
this atechnical comment on the draft, since it relates to a informative
annex.