Economies of scale or a deterrence measure?

I am definitely late to the party on this one but I have an excuse – the Abbott government are providing so much chaff to munch on, I’m overindulging.

Yesterday I was alerted to an already three day old article by Michael Safi in The Guardian. Essentially Michael’s article concentrates on changes to the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) which are indeed a worry, although expected given the recent inhumane and illegal, under international law, changes to this county’s treatment of asylum seekers. What drew my attention even more was one small sentence.

It [the RRT] will be merged with the Migration Review Tribunal and three other bodies as part of a government efficiency drive.

Most readers visiting this site are aware of our experience with both the refugee and later partner visa systems of this country. The RRT hears appeals by asylum seekers who have been denied a protection visa by the Immigration Department. The Migration Review Tribunal (MRT) is the body that hears appeals against other visa denials/refusals: partner visas, student visas and so on. I recently did an investigative series covering current processing of partner visas and appeal hearing timelines.

These articles show the system is already in crisis. Through the grapevine this week I also heard the Immigration Department is reducing, or has possibly already reduced in November last year, the number of partner visa staff. I can’t confirm that, but if it is true then we can expect the backlogs to increase.

Very specific experience and training is required for the RRT. The Minter Ellison assessment(discussed in Are decision makers adequately resourced?) recommends debriefing and access to mental health professionals for Immigration Department staff so it is logical this would also be a recommendation for RRT members. Perhaps not quite so much training and support is required for the MRT members, but certainly cultural intelligence training is an absolute must. The breadth of international and domestic law, which members need to have a working knowledge of, is quite astounding.

The government’s plan is to merge these two tribunals (which already share staff of a mere 420) with THREE other bodies as part of an efficiency drive. According to the budget papers, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, the Social Security Appeals Tribunal, the Refugee Review Tribunal and Migration Review Tribunal, and the Classification Review Board will all be amalgamated into one review body. I am happy to see the advice, “Details of the new arrangements will be developed in consultation with key stakeholders”. I wonder who are classified as key stakeholders. The asylum seekers or partner visas applicants and sponsors? Why do I doubt that?

I am all for efficiency. Economies of scale can be very effective in improving outputs. My main concern here is the vastly different skills and experience required to decide an appeal for NewStart versus an appeal for refugee status. The Classifications Review Board? I fail to see any synergies here at all.

I am not denigrating the skills of existing staff of these bodies. I am definitely questioning the wisdom of amalgamating such different bodies and expecting quality outcomes. There are massive backlogs throughout the immigration/refugee system before anyone even reaches the appeals process (see investigative series above). How is this amalgamation of such diverse bodies contributing to processing those backlogs?

The mainstream media would do well to watch this development closely. I don’t expect the best outcomes for the real stakeholders, people like my family.

Frankly the only reason I can think of for the amalgamations would be to make refugees’ lives even more miserable, if that’s possible.

Claiming that it is to improve efficiency is no more than their usual lies dressed up to salve what little conscience their barrackers’ possess. The Liars themselves don’t possess anything resembling conscience.

I hope that this government is unable to do too much damage before they are thrown out. Hopefully voters will never allow themselves to be fooled into voting for such a mendacious and destructive government again.

Search:

Follow me:

Article 19 UDHR:

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Copyright Notice:

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Team Oyeniyi and Love versus Goliath with appropriate and specific direction to the original content. Discussion of our experience may be used in developing teaching and support materials for non-for-profit purposes after consultation with and permission from the author.