Wednesday, October 26, 2011

As you may know, there are those out there who attempt to
influence the content of childrens' television. We call them "parents
groups," although many are not comprised of parents, or at least not of
folks whose primary interest is as parents. Study them and you'll find
a wide array of agendum at work...and I suspect that, in some cases,
their stated goals are far from their real goals.

Nevertheless, they all seek to make kidvid more enriching
and redeeming, at least by their definitions, and at the time, they had
enough clout to cause the networks to yield. Consultants were brought
in and we, the folks who were writing cartoons, were ordered to include
certain "pro-social" morals in our shows. At the time, the dominant
"pro-social" moral was as follows: The group is always right...the
complainer is always wrong.

This was the message of way too many eighties' cartoon
shows. If all your friends want to go get pizza and you want a burger,
you
should bow to the will of the majority and go get pizza with them.
There was even a show for one season on CBS called The Get-Along
Gang, which was dedicated unabashedly to this principle. Each week,
whichever member of the gang didn't get along with the gang learned the
error of his or her ways.

That's just... I don't even... what?

I assume that this valuable social message also extends to your mother's favorite line about everyone else jumping off a bridge.

So in the Dungeons & Dragons cartoon, for some weird reason they were forced to keep contriving situations for Eric, the whiny cavalier, to complain about what the rest of the group was doing... so that they could promote the message by ultimately making him look dumb or suffer in some way.

I recently read (most of) David Sirota's latest book, Back to our Future: How the 1980s Explain the World We Live in Now--Our Culture, Our Politics, Our Everything. I enjoyed it, but at the same time, I found it a little excessively paranoid. Sirota's thesis is that the movies, shows, and all other entertainment that we consumed as kids in the Reagan era was all part of an overarching propaganda machine, pushing various right wing values like nationalism, consumerism, and the notion that all government is part of an evil conspiracy. In some cases I saw his point, and in others I just felt like it was a big Rorschach test where Sirota was superimposing his framework on everything he could find.

Anyway, I can't make heads or tails of this "the group is always right" thing, which is one case where there seems to have been an actual conspiracy by a specific group of individuals openly trying to give all shows a consistent message.

On a side note, blogger.com told me today that I should try switching my blog over to their nifty new customizable display format. So I did, because the group is always right and I don't want to be a complainer.

I haven't spent enough time browsing it to decide if I hate it. But if you hate it, feel free to let me know.

Monday, October 24, 2011

Am I spreading myself too thin here? Between the Atheist Experience blog (now new and improved on freethoughtblogs.com!), Castles of Air, and other media formats, it seems like this blog is one of the main casualties that doesn't get enough love. Really short remarks go on Twitter, less short discussions on Facebook, programming stuff goes on CoA, and a lot of comments I just save for the show. But wait, there is one thing I can always put here: arguments with economic conservatives! And here we go again.

I have a firm policy of refusing to humor people whose method of arguing is sending me links to YouTube. But I made a special exception in this case because it's Penn Jillette, and Penn -- while very often wrong -- is always so very, very cool.

So, okay, I watched this video and was, as always, entertained by Penn's speaking style. And IMHO he's still wrong.

Penn obviously made some reasonable points that are easy to agree with. "Let's stop the government from doing really stupid stuff." Well, duh, yeah! I'm against things that are stupid! Way to go out on a limb, Penn! Solidarity, man!

In all seriousness, Penn and I agree on a lot of things, because
many of his beliefs are already in the Venn diagram that includes
liberals. Let's stop killing people we don't know for reasons we
don't understand: check. Let's stop bailing out rich people: check. No
more tobacco subsidies: check. Stop wasting time locking up people
with marijuana, okay.

But then he gets to the part where a libertarian and a liberal would
disagree... and he just chickens out. He says "You can make that
argument that we still need education, and we still need infrastructure,
and you'll probably win with me." Woot! I beat Penn Jillette without
saying a word!

Actually, let me make this response explicit. Hey, Penn. We still
need education, and we still need infrastructure. That is stuff that
government does well and libertarian candidates don't propose a good and
practical alternative to it. In fact, let's go back to the beginning
of the video, and see why Penn Jillette thinks we don't actually need
public education anymore. "I believe the tools are in place for people
to learn on their own... I think that education is going to come from
the web."

And that is, as Penn himself might say, "Bullshit!" Yes, most
people have access to the web now. NO, that doesn't mean that it's an
acceptable substitute for having actual teachers who spend individual
time with students and react to their needs. You'll notice that despite
all his praise of the internet, Penn states that he sends his own kids
to "fancy ass private schools," and good for them! They're lucky to
have a dad whose net worth is $175 million. But hey, if you're a poor
kid then you can damn well flail around on web sites and educate
yourself.

If you want to make me waste time on this (and I hope you won't,
because it's too bloody obvious) I'll slap together some statistics -- yet again -- that show that countries which have solid public education systems
have a more educated populace; and people who have a high school
diploma -- yes, even from one of those dreaded public high schools,
like me -- are better off and more successful (statistically, as a group) than people whose only
education comes from "the internet."

See, the argument is not that some elitist government has to bring
"enlightenment" to people. It's that it is a social good and in all our
best interests for our citizens to be educated. And in the event that
we have kids whose parents can't send them to fancy-ass private schools,
we provide publicly funded alternatives to them rather than just
throwing them under the bus and saying "Here, Timmy, play with this
smart phone. See you in twelve years!"

And I'd gladly argue with Penn about bridges and infrastructure,
too. But as I already said, I can't, because in this particular video Penn
conceded that without a fight.

Monday, October 17, 2011

Just for the hell of it, and to keep this from being a dead blog, here's my report on what TV shows I've been watching on Netflix. Obviously this doesn't exactly count as earth-shattering news, but what the hey.

I usually don't sit and watch TV while doing nothing else, but I'll frequently have it on in the background while doing other activities.

Finished season 5 of Doctor Who on Netflix instant watch this morning (which is why I decided to create this list). Now I have to wait for season 6 to end so I can start queuing it. I enjoyed it immensely. Lynnea will not watch it because as far as she's concerned, David Tennant is the last Doctor Who. Won't even give Matt Smith the time of day. Poor Matt.

I've been streaming audio of the BritCom The IT Crowd on my Android in the car. Nearly done with the series. The only time this does not work is when they do musical interludes with lots of laugh track, as there is clearly some visual comedy going on that I'm missing. Almost done with the entire series. It's enjoyable, but kind of a stupider version of Big Bang Theory, which is unfortunately not available on instant watch. Stupider because in BBT, you can tell that the nerd jokes are authentic and loving. In ITC, half the time they are clearly speaking complete gibberish for laughs.

I finished rewatching (or relistening to) Buffy a while back, but I never did get through Angel. Nearly done with Season 2 now, but it's been lower priority for me than "Who".

Lynnea and I are now about two seasons behind Dexter. Added Season 5 to the DVD queue as it's not available on instant.

Got Ben hooked on Third Rock From the Sun. One of the all-time great comedies, IMHO. I'm saving episodes for when he's around and we have nothing else to do.

Watched a single episode of Breaking Bad. Promising start, I think, so I'm saving more episodes for later. It was recommended by a coworker who, in turn loves Game of Thrones and has to put up with my constant danger of spoiling the series.

Speaking of which, season 2 of Thrones starts up again in April, so I'll be going to my sister's again for screenings. Woohoo!

We still have about one and a half seasons of Quantum Leap that Lynnea's never seen, and we watch it at the rate of about one episode every two months. That oughta take a while.

Well, that about covers it. I know it sounds like I watch a lot of TV, but as I said, I often play it as background noise in the car and while working on other stuff, and it took me over three years to get through Doctor Who, so, you know...