Griffin also needs to supply details of any email address, chat rooms or social networking sites he uses, including user names and passwords.

He must also disclose the name of each person with whom he associates.

Justice Davis said Griffin resisted claims he pushed his mobile telephone under the door of the change room.

"It is not necessary for the applicant to prove this allegation in order to prove the contravention..." he said.

"It is sufficient to prove that the respondent (Griffin) was at the shopping centre without either his niece or sister.

"Miss A and Miss B have both sworn affidavits.

"As the evidence is not contested, I can see no reason to dismiss it.

"The respondent (Griffin) was identified in closed-circuit television security footage taken outside the City Beach store.

"I find that the respondent did push his mobile telephone under the door of the change room while the telephone was in camera mode and thereby attempted to take images of Miss A while she was addressed."

Griffin was identified in CCTV footage taken outside the City Beach store.

Justice Davis said the central question was whether the adequate protection of the community - despite the contravention or likely contravention of the existing order - could be ensured by a supervision order.

"The respondent has previously been on supervision and has been unable to comply with the terms of the supervision order," Judge Davis said.

"That has resulted in him being in custody for much of the time during which the supervision order has been in force.

"The respondent, while in the community, has not committed a serious sexual offence.

"The conduct towards Miss A was no doubt very upsetting for her and unacceptable.

"While Miss A was a child, the psychiatrists both opined that her youth was not a factor in the respondent's behaviour.

"He shows no tendency to offend against children."

Judge Davis said the evidence of the psychiatrists is to the effect that the supervision order is fulfilling its purpose in protecting the community against unacceptable risk of the commission of serious sexual offences by the respondent.

"It is clear, though, that the respondent's activity should be more carefully monitored.

"The additional conditions that I have imposed achieve this," he said.

Both psychiatrists agreed that a loosening of a condition prohibiting Griffin from drinking alcohol was appropriate.

One psychiatrist, Dr Harden, formed the view that Griffin met the diagnostic criteria for the paraphilia of Sexual Sadism with Personality Disorder Not Otherwise Specified with Anti-Social Borderline and Narcissistic Features.

Dr Harden noted that no violent sexual offence had been committed by Griffin while on supervision.

The front page of The Morning Bulletin in August 1999 after serial rapist Peter Scott Griffin pleaded guilty to a series of violent attacks in Rockhampton. He was sentenced to 13 years jail in February 2000.File

Dr Sundin noted her previous opinion that the respondent had a history suggestive of a Mixed Personality Disorder with Borderline Anti-Social Personality Traits.

In her latest report, she opined that the "supervision order is serving the purpose of containing the risk that Mr Griffin potentially poses to the community" and recommended that he be released again under the supervision order.

The Capricornia Correctional Centre.Contributed

On the question of alcohol, Dr Sundin said this: "Given his history of decades of abstinence from alcohol and the conflict that it is (sic) created in his interactions with QCS staff over consumption of alcohol, I suggest that consideration could be given to deleting this clause from the supervision order."

In a supplementary report of October 16, 2018, Dr Sundin said this: "Since I supplied my original report on this man dated September 21, 2018, I have been reflecting further on the alcohol abstinence clause of his supervision order. My advice recommending complete removal of this clause may be premature.

"It is 25 years since Mr Griffin says he has consumed alcohol and he asserts that he is not interested in resuming consumption of alcohol.

"Rather than being an all or nothing approach, I would prefer if QCS introduce a gradual easing of the abstinence requirement in discussion with Mr Griffin.

"This could be a gesture of goodwill and an opportunity to practically demonstrate to Mr Griffin the benefits of more open disclosure with his case manager and psychologist."

Another psychiatrist, Dr Harden, formed the view that Griffin met the diagnostic criteria for the paraphilia of Sexual Sadism with Personality Disorder Not Otherwise Specified with Anti-Social Borderline and Narcissistic Features.

Dr Harden noted that no violent sexual offence had been committed by Griffin while on supervision.