Tauroggen 2020 Englishhttps://tauroggen-e.net
Truth, Beauty, Goodness from Lisbon to VladivostokWed, 14 Feb 2018 04:59:50 +0000enhourly1http://wordpress.com/https://secure.gravatar.com/blavatar/0638c501fe76c50be68c40d791688481?s=96&d=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.wp.com%2Fi%2Fbuttonw-com.pngTauroggen 2020 Englishhttps://tauroggen-e.net
Co-creation Or How We Prevented World War Ihttps://tauroggen-e.net/2017/11/05/co-creation-or-how-we-prevented-world-war-i/
https://tauroggen-e.net/2017/11/05/co-creation-or-how-we-prevented-world-war-i/#respondSun, 05 Nov 2017 20:21:33 +0000http://tauroggen-e.net/?p=191Continue reading Co-creation Or How We Prevented World War I→]]>The myth by Christopher Clark that England “sleepwalked” into WW I [1] is put to rest by Helmut Roewer, who has analyzed the pre-war diaries and letters of war instigators Herbert Asquith and Lloyd George (PM and FinMin in 1914) [2].

Roewer considers Germany’s large merchant fleet the key factor – by 1914 both Hamburg’s HAPAG and Bremen’s Norddeutscher Lloyd became 4 to 5 times bigger than the largest English shipping company [2].

Willy Stöwer: The turbine speedliner Vaterland of HAPAG. 1914

When asked during a presentation however, if an English shareholding of up to 50% in these companies could have prevented the war, he gets defensive and even lauds HAPAG’s closed shareholder structure [3].

Amazing, how traditional attitudes prevail in some people.

What could have been prevented and what achieved if we had had an Anglo-German Co-Creation process in the 1890s?

Co-Creation is an appreciative process of collaboration. It can be used in all creative areas. Co-creation successfully overcomes the emotional impression of separation and fear and replaces it with unity and love.

]]>https://tauroggen-e.net/2017/11/05/co-creation-or-how-we-prevented-world-war-i/feed/0christophnikolausRoewer b1willy-stower-der-turbinenschnelldampfer-vaterland-der-hapag-1914co-creation 1260 Years Ago Today: The Battle That Brought Prussia On Its Way To Becoming A European Superpowerhttps://tauroggen-e.net/2017/11/05/260-years-ago-today-the-battle-that-brought-prussia-on-its-way-to-becoming-a-european-superpower/
https://tauroggen-e.net/2017/11/05/260-years-ago-today-the-battle-that-brought-prussia-on-its-way-to-becoming-a-european-superpower/#respondSun, 05 Nov 2017 19:56:28 +0000http://tauroggen-e.net/?p=166Continue reading 260 Years Ago Today: The Battle That Brought Prussia On Its Way To Becoming A European Superpower→]]>On 5 November 1757, Prussia seemed to be finished. At Rossbach a superior French army marched on and threatened to eliminate Prussia as a European power.

Two cavalry attacks secured Prussia an overwhelming victory on 5 November 1757 [source: Ullstein Bild]Contrary to expectations, Frederick the Great won, which he owed above all to the skill of his young general von Seydlitz.

The 36-year-old Friedrich Wilhelm Freiherr von Seydlitz (1721-1773) commanded the entire Prussian cavalry [Source: UIG via Getty Images]With his hard-won victories, Frederick the Great solved his self-created problems at the expense of his subjects – what else is new for the observer of contemporary politics?

How would history have gone without his gambling – without his invasion of Silesia, without his pointless provocation of Tsarina Elisabeth (at an evening round table!)?

No war and no trauma in every generation? No “German mission” of Prussia? No 1871? No World War I? No cultural and social decadence?

It has only now become known that Jewish officials in the United States, Israel, and Germany have taken this advice to heart – and have for years downplayed the number of Jewish victims in the 20th century – without making a big fuss.

The Last Supper with angels by Tintoretto (1518-1594)

18 Million Jewish Victims Become 6 Million

The total number of Jewish victims was reduced from 18 million to 6 million. The true number however remains evident and the arithmetic irrefutable.

6 Million Victims In Russia Until The End Of World War I …

These gentle officials have allowed 6 million Russian Jews, who perished until 1917, to vanish into oblivion. Back in 1912 the “American Jewish Year Book 5672, 23 September1911 – 11 September 1912” on page 308 still truthfully reported :

Russia has since 1890 adopted a deliberate plan to expel or ex- terminate six millions of its people for no other reason than that they refuse to become members of the Greek Church, but prefer to remain Jews. To carry out this purpose, it has used several methods. Wholesale assassinations (called pogroms), have been employed in order to arouse the religious fanaticism, the greed, and the savagery of the needy, the ignorant and the depraved among the Russian people.

The American Jewish Year Book 1912

The progression of terror and death during World War I was also recorded by “The Jewish Criterion (Pittsburgh)” on June 25th, 1915″:

The annihilation of the six million Jews now congregated in the Russian domains goes on in a well defined and systematic manner.

… Plus 6 Million Victims In Eastern Europe Between The Two World Wars …

With regard to 6 million victims of the inter-war period, these Jewish officials also prefer to turn the other cheek, instead of naming the culprits. As the Chicago Tribune and the New York Times had researched and published on 19/20 July of 1921, a wave of secular suffering of the Jews commenced again between the wars:

Russia’s 6,000,000 Jews are facing extermination by massacre.

New York Times July 20, 1921

Already on September 8, 1919, with regard to Poland and Ukraine, the New York Times had warned on page 5 :

127,000 Jews Have Been Killed and 6,000,000 Are in Peril. […] 6,000,000 souls in Ukrainia and in Poland have received notice through action and by word that they are going to be completely exterminated – this fact stands before the whole world as the paramount issue of the present day.

… Plus 6 Million Jewish Victims In Germany And Around After 1933 Equal 18 Million Witnesses Of Injustice And Prejudice In The 20th Century

This third catastrophe again occurred in spite of urgent warnings in the mainstream media, like on 31 May 1936 in the New York Times on page 14:

AMERICANS APPEAL FOR JEWISH REFUGE. The petition, in expressing the opinion of enlightened Christian leadership in the United States, favoring a larger Jewish immigration into Palestine, stressed the intolerable sufferings of the millions of Jews in “the European holocaust.” […] to save these unfortunate millions from total annihilation […]

The Happy Easter Message Of 2016

Forgiveness and gentleness of Jewish officials in the United States, Israel, and Germany are the very happy Easter message of 2016. With modesty and in silence they have reduced the 18 million Jewish victims in the 20th century – 6 million in Tsarist Russia + 6 million in Eastern Europe between the wars + 6 million in the German sphere from 1933 – to 6 million.

The world can now see that today’s Jewish officials are poles apart from the fury and intolerance of High Priest Caiaphas and the mob of Jerusalem.

What you are hoping for is not going to happen:
governments that emerge from our established political parties which will solve our problems in a “reasonable” fashion.

Germany and its constitutional bodies have become a “Hippie Nation” (Anthony Glees, 08.09.2015).

This is the fast culmination of our identity crisis which is rampant since 1945.

This is illegitimate because a deeply felt German culture is not our private possession (which we can exchange for something convenient), but it is an important part of the spiritual evolution of the planet.

This part can only be effective if it is carried on in our hearts.
Open yourself up to this:

That is the purpose of our crisis: Identity.

Once our attitude changes, all practical problems will disappear.

This can have many practical manifestations. The Monday demonstrations which led to the overthrow of the SED, are probably not suspect of being Nazi.

Civic breakdowns like the unanimously decided Memorial for Deserters will then be part of a dark, distant past.

Best Regards

Christoph Friedrich

]]>https://tauroggen-e.net/2015/12/09/re-seasons-greetings-2/feed/0christophnikolausSecond Open Letter By Major General Schultze-Ronhof To Chancellor Merkel Asking Her To Step Down (Translation)https://tauroggen-e.net/2015/10/21/second-open-letter-asking-chancellor-merkel-to-step-down-by-major-general-schultze-ronhof-translation/
https://tauroggen-e.net/2015/10/21/second-open-letter-asking-chancellor-merkel-to-step-down-by-major-general-schultze-ronhof-translation/#respondWed, 21 Oct 2015 13:57:35 +0000http://tauroggen-e.net/?p=130Continue reading Second Open Letter By Major General Schultze-Ronhof To Chancellor Merkel Asking Her To Step Down (Translation)→]]>This is a translation of the second open letter published in Epoch Times on 9 October 2015. The first open letter of 21 September 2015 will be translated later on. See Schultze-Ronhof’s bio at Wikipedia [German].

Breach Of The Oath Of The Chancellor –

Second Open Letter by Major General Schultze-Ronhof: Why Merkel Has To Step Down For The Benefit Of The German People

A retired Major General of the Bundeswehr sharply critizises Merkel’s policy on refugees: with her welcome messages she has triggered a tidal wave of mass immigration that has created incalculable harm for the German people of today and their descendants.

Because nothing has happened in this matter, he now wrote a second open letter. He calls for Merkel’s resignation and suggests that Horst Seehofer (Prime Minister of Bavaria) should assume office until the end of the legislative period. Again he combines a relentless analysis and concrete proposals.

Schultze-Rhonhof supports economic refugees himself, but clearly distances his stance from the headless policies of the Chancellor.

His unabridged letter follows.

Dear Mrs. Chancellor,

after four weeks this is my second “Open Letter” to you regarding the tidal wave of mass immigration.

The wave of helpfulness by ordinary German people, the devoted effort of thousands of altruistic auxiliaries, and the services of our administrations have initially obstructed the clear perception of the difficulties and limitations of our integration capabilities.

I took the liberty to notify you by letter of 11 September 2015 to the dangers of uncontrolled mass immigration to Germany and to make proposals for asylum rights, for controlling immigration, and for ending the ongoing wave of mass immigration.

Since then I have witnessed your honest but unsuccessful attempt to handle the situation. Since then I have observed that the mass influx of migrants continues unabated and entails quite different, ugly consequences which have not dawned on me four weeks ago.

Meanwhile, current estimates for the accumulated number of immigrants have added up to between 2 and 2.5 million: about 700,000 illegal but non-returned asylum seekers, about 300,000 migrants gone underground, and between 1 and 1.5 million new arrivals in 2015.

You have made no effective attempt so far to stop the tidal wave of immigration into Germany.

Pursuing your habit of very, very long deliberations you have wasted valuable time which you could have used to begin to avert further damage to our people.

Request For Your Resignation

I would therefore ask you to be so decent as to resign from your office, and I ask you and the Vice-Chancellor (by separate letter) to hand over government to the Chairman of the third governing party, Mr Horst Seehofer, until the next regular election.

Mr Seehofer and his State of Bavaria are hardest hit by the current wave of migration.

His thinking and his actions are quite obviously better aligned with Germany’s national interest than yours.

As a father of four he is – in a natural way – more interested in the German future of coming generations in our country than you are.

Mr Seehofer is also experienced as a former minister in the federal government and as the head of a state government.

Given your indifferent attitude regarding Germany’s identity and our self-preservation and given your numerous sudden political reversals in the recent past, it is also unclear where you want to lead Germany during the current exceptional circumstances.

Accusations Against You

The main accusation against you is your breach of the oath of the Chancellor. You have sworn to work towards the benefit of the German people and to avert harm from the people. By tolerating and causing the tidal wave of immigration and by not being able to put an end to it, you have caused incalculable damage to the German people and its descendants. While some immigration may be desired you have rendered an absolutely negligible service to the German people with the minor number of immigrants who can actually be integrated.

To the detriment of the German people you have displayed a significant lack of moderation by not being able to balance the Christian duty for humanitarian aid to refugees on the one hand and your government’s responsibility for our people on the other hand.

With your messages that Germany was an immigration country and that asylum seekers were welcome in Germany, you have triggered a wave of mass migration. This migration has caused additional suffering and tragedies.

To hide your failures you have spread the illusion that our country and our population were able master the burden of mass immigration for federal and other public budgets, for domestic security, education and the social security system. You have thereby concealed the additional public debt load, the reduction in benefits for our population, the renovation of roads, waterways, bridges, and sewer systems which now remain undone and you have concealed the perpetual burdens for our children and grandchildren.

You have damaged the country’s reputation and role in the EU because the tidal wave of immigration you have caused has put all other EU states under pressure to act. Your demand for national immigration quotas is an attempt of illegitimate interference in the sovereignty of other states and the self-determination of other peoples.

Just as the territories and boundaries of countries are inviolable and may only be changed with the will of the populations concerned, so the constituent peoples themselves must not be changed through coercion and against the will of the populations concerned. Mass immigration is a change of a country’s people. (The introduction of a quota-based solidarity mechanism was incidentally rejected by Germany as recently as 2013).

The other European countries either had to accept large migrant populations from their former colonies or have Russian minorities within their borders, also Czechs and Poles have negative experiences as multi-ethnic states. To try to force these countries and their peoples to accept new minorities reveals historical ignorance, German know-all attitude, or EU megalomania.
Instead of hoping for a “fair” distribution of migrants to other countries, you should have brought the true perpetrators of the current migrations on board with their target countries and with those who pay for it. The current “escape movements” from the Middle East and from the states around the Southern and Eastern Mediterranean and the opening of the Southern Mediterranean coast for refugees from Central and West Africa are primarily due to the regime-change-wars which the US, Britain, and France have started without being themselves threatened by these countries.

These three allies had the dictators in those now destabilized countries overthrown through secret service operations, mercenaries, bribes, and finally open warfare. Every time the result was civil wars, chaos, refugee camps, and the refugee flows of today. The United States for example have so far only agreed to accept 1,500 refugees in 2015 (other sources: 4,000). This is less than the state of Bavaria had to accommodate in a single day. Having the German people bear the brunt of these refugee flows is the opposite of “averting harm” as required by your oath.

You have reduced the immigration debate to the concept of “welcome culture” versus “xenophobia”. By this you have suppressed and avoided a discussion of the fears and concerns of the population and secondly you have split the nation. The more appropriate concept would have been “guests” and “host”. The German nation has hosted these guests with a lot of willingness to help and has displayed great idealism. But you have not realized and have failed to clarify that hosts also do have rights.
Every host may determine how many guests he invites into his house. Every host has the right to determine the ways and customs in his house. Every host has the right to prevent a long-term take over of his house by the guests. Guests have to respect these rights and have to adapt in the host country. If this is not achievable by each individual host due to the “amorphous mass” of guests the host state needs to ensure this for its citizens. Of all this nothing is happening under your government.

Instead You Decree “Germany has to change”

You display an ambiguous attitude to safeguarding the German identity of our people. In 2010 you said that “multiculturalism has failed, absolutely failed” at the Germany Day of your party’s youth organization (Junge Union). And now you try to sell to the German public the advantages of cultural enrichment resulting from large scale immigration.

You know very well that millions of immigrants will not shed their customs and their culture as long as they will live in ghettos. You know that ghetto-formation is inevitable with two million immigrants in just a few years. You know that further millions of immigrants are waiting to take advantage of our family re-unification permission within a few years. You know that the 80% Muslim share of migrants perceives our legal and moral liberalism as decadent and intends to “overcome” it.

In 2000 and thereafter you have dumped CDU party whip Friedrich Merz and his notion of a “primary culture” and today you ignore the plea of ​​the Prime Ministers of Rhineland-Palatinate and Bavaria for a German “primary culture”. The concept of a primary culture is at the core of the ability to integrate immigrants. The debate about a German primary culture and its obligatory nature for immigrants was a test of strength which you should not have dodged in 2000.

Our ideas about the separation of church and state, or of the equality between men and women were not accepted by all immigrants at the time. Our neglect of the German language in science, advertising and music is not a sign of self esteem which would motivate immigrants to immediately learn German. Our constant self-portrayal as the “dark land of the sinister 12 years” and our turning a blind eye on centuries of brilliant cultural and other achievements also does not testify of love for ourselves.

Immigrants who see that the Germans in their heart have no self respect will certainly not want to belong to such a people. They just want German prosperity. You, Dr. Merkel, have done a great disservice to our ability to integrate immigrants by refusing to conduct a debate on the primary culture issue as proposed by Mr. Merz. In this crucial issue even today you act indifferent and against the backdrop of the current mass immigration I think you are not suited to be Chancellor.

You try to hide the additional burden of mass immigration behind alleged gains for the German economy, for the social security systems and the demographic deficit. The additional costs that are now given as 10 billion euros in the year, are a pure deception of the German taxpayer.
The new costs include far more for than housing refurbishments, permanent rentals, new construction, extensions of schools, day care centers, nursing homes and prisons, family maintenance, pocket money, health care costs, family reunification, additional staff for schools, kindergartens, employment services, agencies for refugees, police, translator, social workers, lawyers, courts, language courses, and homes for the elderly (a recent advertising booklet of the Federal Government “Deutschland Aktuell” Issue 4/2015 states on page 12: “65-year-old immigrants are among the population groups that are growing the fastest.” This is followed by the indication that the care organizations have to adjust to foreign languages ​​and religious needs). More recent estimates of the additional annual cost to federal, state and local governments are now at 40 billion euros.

Benefits to the national economy are limited. Employable migrants constitute a very small minority among immigrants. The less able will have to be supported by taxpayers. This confirms the thesis of Mr. Lafontaine (former Minister of Finance) that “profits are privatized while losses are socialized”.

The influx of foreign workers is also questionable in other ways. Firstly suitable workers are often needed in their home countries for the development of their own economies. Their migration to Europe undermines our foreign aid programs.

Secondly, the domestic economy is primarily responsible for the employment and maintenance of the indigenous population. If and when the domestic economy needs to recruit from abroad, its primary objective, full employment, has been met. The secondary objective of increasing profits needs to be weighed against the costs to the German taxpayer as given above.

Incidentally, the proportion of current migrants, which can be incorporated into the German economy is minimal. In a medium sized German city an attempt to recruit workers from 300 “asylum seekers” has yielded 6 employable persons. In Sigmaringen local business have offered apprenticeships to more than 3,000 people, mostly young men, living in barracks. Only 8 migrants have taken advantage of this offer.

Whereas the President of the German Federation of Employers (Mr. Grillo) who demands an influx of foreign workers and obviously thinks more about private gains than socialized losses, the Presidents of the German Chambers of Commerce and Chambers of Trade Crafts warn against illusions about the suitability of migrants for the German economy.

The Danish Employers’ Association has admitted this spring that the integration of migrants into the labor market has failed all across the board.

The demographic deficit is a home made problem that has been created over the last 40 years all the while it has been predicted with pinpoint accuracy by demographic scientists.

No German government, not even yours, has invested the necessary share of gross national product in the promotion of marriage, family formation, birth, young families, day care centers and day care staff. Instead, your predecessor governments have used checkbook diplomacy with tax payer money. Instead, we have pumped funds into countries that had long since overcome the status of “developing countries”. Instead, on almost every trip abroad, German leaders promise money to “poor” countries.

Instead, you are fraudulently delaying a Greek default at Germany’s expense.

Instead, we are the largest net contributor to the EU, without taking discounts like the United Kingdom.

Instead, gender mainstreaming is promoted instead of educating boys and girls on the natural roles of fathers and mothers and making this choice desirable.

All this represents a vast area of your failure.

The demographic deficit is largely to blame on your predecessor governments. But your open “wallet” for immigrants proves that the money would have been available for young German families during your tenure.

With Germany’s naval rescue operations in the Mediterranean you have aided and abetted mass migration and human smuggling from Africa because you have refused to issue the order to bring rescued migrants back to the African coast.

Your welcome messages to migrants have also sent a wrong signal to our own people. You proclaim that immigrants will be integrated in a short period of time. This faulty credo is constantly repeated by the media with acknowledgment, if not encouragement, by the Federal Chancellery. While some immigrants may be willing and capable of integration – and there are examples of that – the overwhelming majority of immigrants does not integrate and does not want to integrate.

A constrained housing market and limited public budgets are not sufficient for a complete distribution of immigrants among the German population. This will lead to new “language colonies” and ghettos, where next to the positives also unacceptable native customs will be practiced, e.g. female genital mutilations, forced marriages, honor killings, drug trafficking.

The current ghettoisation in Germany (as in France and England) shows that ghettos often morph into problem areas, where there is no integration, and where German police do not dare to move. Already now there is a immigrant accommodation in barracks which are not entered by German police any more.

The intellectual abilities and illiteracy of many immigrants preclude an integration into the labor market and any real integration into society. There will be another class of dispossessed requiring ongoing subsistence.

The majority of migrants are Muslims. Many of them despise our liberal way of life and reject it decisively. Out of conviction they will not integrate.

With moderate immigration, the customs of the host country are slowly acquired by the guests as experience shows. With immigration by millions within a few years, the bad habits as well as the good are usually retained as identification with the homeland. Dr. Merkel, your helplessness regarding the current mass immigration will inflict permanent damage on domestic security and social peace in our country.

All of this is known to you and you try to conceal it. You downplay the issues raised, because you do not understand how to master them. Please make room for a politician who is obviously more suitable to solve our current problems.

The ugly side effects
The majority of immigrants who come to us are certainly pleasant and ordinary people. However, with the massive influx of two million people there is also a share of shady persons in our country, that burden our social peace and domestic security.

Among the now recognizable ugly side effects of mass immigration many things are already in the process of settling and spreading. The masses of migrants not only bring their plight which they wish to leave behind, but also customs of which they believe that they would be tolerated in our liberal society.

All these phenomena are now widely reported on the Internet and by police officers and volunteers, but they are not mentioned in the German media which seem directed by a “wonderful” hand.

These ugly side effects are the “concealed part of reality”:
– Rape in the environment of migrant accommodations
– Forced prostitution in migrant accommodations
– Mass brawls between ethnicities, religions and clans with batons, tear gas and knives,
– Injuries and mobbing of police officers,
– Begging
– Occupations of churches to extort church asylum,
– Mobbing and insulting passersby as “Sh … -Germans”
– Pushing German passersby from the sidewalk,
– Indecent assaults and harassing of women,
– Smashing of furniture to be moved to a more attractive city,
– Escape from lodging provided by authorities, from trains and buses, in order to escape registration,
– Vociferous complaints, if food does not correspond that in the country of origin,
– Complaints from migrants, if they have to wait in doctors’ offices, as long as German patients
– Refusal of migrants to be directed by women in doctor’s offices and in public offices,
– Massive, unpaid purchases from migrant lodging in internet trading,
– Refusal of migrant groups in shops to pay for your purchases.

That this list – according to ongoing government commentary – should be “xenophobic”, says more about the relationship of our government to reality than about the list itself.

Even if these side effects are just ugly exceptions, exceptions from a number of 2 million fresh migrants are more than enough to poison the climate between guests and hosts.

The ugly side effects also include a very regrettable loss of democracy in Germany. These include gross violations of the fundamental right to freedom of expression and against the Christian value of truth.

This also includes a loss of confidence in the integrity of government, parliaments, political parties and media by a substantial portion of our population.
The fears and concerns of citizens about the sudden burdens are insulted as “racism, xenophobia and right wing”.

You have poisoned the climate of discussion in Germany and have strangled the right to freedom of expression. Policemen and teachers have told me about a ban on talking about and reporting on migrant behavior. Employees of a chain store company are on record as having been instructed not to report theft by migrants, so that their company does not appear as xenophobic.

These are conditions which we otherwise bemoan in authoritarian states.The loss of confidence results from the filtered and manipulated reporting on the dark side of immigration and on the horrendous permanent costs for federal, state, and local governments and our social security system. The whole lie usually begins with half a truth.

Obvious dangers

With rapidly increasing new immigration it is likely that the high expectations of many immigrants are not met. Discontent will eventually be discharged. Already there are distribution struggles among various migrant groups and demands to German authorities, aid organizations, aid workers and security forces.

The union of police employees has pointed out the emergence of violent, criminal structures wihtin migrant accommodations. In some barracks which are shared by soldiers and migrants, arms and ammunition are stored. It can not be ruled out that migrants obtain access to weapons in order to force their demands. This would confront the Bundeswehr and police with problems which they could hardly solve under German law.

The majority of migrants are young and healthy men, even if the media prefer to show women and small children. These men have left their wives in their home countries. Some of them will eventually become active sexually in Germany. When migrants from barracks and military training courses are distributed to villages and towns, our population will be confronted with the dangers.

Imminent consequences

In addition to a desired immigration of professionals and the justified immigration of asylum seekers there are foreseeable negative consequences and implications of the current mass immigration. With your oath of office you have committed “to avert danger from the German people”, which includes timely measures to ensure that no such adverse consequences occur.

The foreseeable, negative consequences are:

– More migrant waves from Afghanistan, Iraq and from Syrians via Turkey,
– The growth of parallel societies
– The increase in “lawless areas” that are not entered by German police,
– The spread of civil war-like clashes between rival immigrant groups from their home countries to Germany,
– The increase of terrorist, extremist and anti-Semitic groups in Germany,
– The increase in organized crime,
– The financial burden for future generations as permanent liabilities,
– The end of deleveraging of public budgets,
– Overburdening of the social security system,
– Congestion of the health system,
– Housing shortage in urban areas and rent increases,
– Displacement of less able German jobseekers from the labor market,
– Additional burden for schools and universities,
– Displacement the German liberal and Christian primary culture,
– The spreading of Islamic legal concepts,
– The “overturning” of majorities between old-established and immigrant populations and between practicing Christian and avowed Muslim population with foreseeable consequences for the law and the customs in Germany.

Independent reviews

Former Chancellor Helmut Schmidt: “We can not digest more foreigners, all hell will be let loose”.

Former judge at the Federal Constitutional Court Udo Di Fabio: “What we are witnessing today is not a rush of asylum claimants. It is not possible to be entitled to political asylum when you enter Germany by land, because Article 16 (a) of the Constitution excludes safe third countries from asylum. … In this sense we see no rush of asylum claimants, … these are prospective immigrants, but very few have a subjective right to asylum as guaranteed by our Constitution”.

A German diplomat from Africa: “The young men coming from Eritrea are almost all draft dodgers and deserters.”

The chairman of the German Bishops’ Conference, Cardinal Reinhard Marx: “Germany should be not an island of prosperity.”

Bishop of Szeged-Csanád (Hungary) László Kiss-Rigó: “These are not refugees. That’s an invasion. They come here with the cry Allahu Akbar and want to conquer us “.

The archbishop of Mosul (Iraq) Amel Shimon Nona to Europe: “Our suffering is a foretaste of what you will suffer.”

Your four measures

You have announced the following four measures to deal with the mass immigration on 4 October 2015:

– To combat the causes of flight. This was tried in vain in Africa for 50 years. The population explosion with 30 million new people per year will frustrate such attempts in the future.

– To have a “fair” distribution of migrants to the countries of Europe. This will be rejected by the majority of states due to their own experiences with foreign national minorities.

– To limit the influx into Europe. At the Mediterranean border of Europe this is not possible with current methods.

– To speed ​​up the asylum procedure. This is not feasible without abolishing legal remedy currently offering three separate legal instances and will be ineffective without scrapping a host of deportation exceptions.

You obviously have no plan to end the great migrations on the “routes to prosperity and security” and to finally limit the influx of asylum seekers.

Your “actions” are illusions and window dressing. This will not dry up the migrant flow nor will the majority of rejected asylum seekers be more likely to leave or ever head back to their home countries. Your demand for a European solution is unsuccessful and it is also your gamble on time for your political survival. You are playing this game to the detriment of the German people, whose interests you should represent. Your oft repeated “We will manage” makes you look like a motorist who refuses to turn around in a dead end road.Necessary measures

I propose to a new government that they declare that Article 6 and 16 of the Constitution, the laws, UN conventions, EU regulations and national regulations, which hinder the solution of the immigrant problem, are suspended, are to be renegotiated, or are to be changed due to “frustration of purpose”. The “frustration of purpose” consists of the current European emergency of a mass migration which simply was not envisioned when the laws were drafted.

The experience of recent months shows that many European countries want to move along similar paths. Citizens of all non-German states are also more interested in their national interests and their national identities, as opposed to the people of Germany and Austria, which have largely lost their national and Christian identity. So this project is promising.

I propose further to prevent the migration of peoples, to practice fast-track procedures for asylum requests, to grant refuge only to war refugees from combat zones, and to repatriate the mass of the migrants as soon as possible.

For this purpose, I recommend:

– That the application of the right of asylum is reduced to the cases laid down in the Constitution,

– That the Constitution is adjusted so that the right to family reunification and the right to multistage court remedies be abolished (this is how Switzerland processes asylum procedures within 48 hours in general)

– That the asylum procedures for African migrants are settled in North Africa or in the countries of origin,

– That immigration by ship across the Mediterranean is prevented according to the Australian model, (Australia’s government has published in all countries of origin newspaper and television ads where it has announced that asylum applications will only be accepted in the local consulates and that boat people are generally returned. The Australian navy takes refugee boats and ships “on the hook” and takes distressed migrants on board and moves them back to the next coast on the opposite shore)

– That members of non-EU Balkan countries and from Asian unrest and poverty areas have their asylum or immigration applications processed only in German diplomatic missions in their home countries, and that nationals from these countries and territories without positive asylum or immigration decisions will be repatriated immediately, and that this shall be published in the countries of origin,

– That only asylum and immigration seekers from war zones as currently Syria are handled as before, but not from refugee camps outside the warring states

– That refugees from war zones after the end of hostilities must leave the country again, if they have been here for less than 5 years,

– That migrants and asylum seekers be deported immediately with their families in case of serious criminal offenses,

– That immigration is generally controlled by the Canadian model and driven by German interest, (selection by annual German immigration needs, German language skills, work experience and professional needs in Germany, educational status and age. Australia and Denmark have similar admission criteria),

– That social benefits are canceled except for widows and orphans’ pensions, for those remaining in the country of origin

– That the family support for marriages within our country, at births, for house building of young couples and for purchases of family needs and for major equipment will be greatly increased.

I ask you once again to resign as Chancellor, and not to block the way for a solution of the international migration crisis.

Sincerely,

Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof

PS. This letter has not been discussed or coordinated with any active politician.

]]>https://tauroggen-e.net/2015/10/21/second-open-letter-asking-chancellor-merkel-to-step-down-by-major-general-schultze-ronhof-translation/feed/0christophnikolausWeimar, Ukraine: Treason Is A Master From New York And Londonhttps://tauroggen-e.net/2015/09/20/weimar-ukraine-treason-is-a-master-from-new-york-and-london/
https://tauroggen-e.net/2015/09/20/weimar-ukraine-treason-is-a-master-from-new-york-and-london/#respondSun, 20 Sep 2015 20:10:44 +0000http://tauroggen-e.net/?p=112Continue reading Weimar, Ukraine: Treason Is A Master From New York And London→]]>The current Ukraine policy of the US displays similarities to the interference of the Anglo-American oligarchy in the politics of the Weimar Republic.

An influential part of the American upper class has interfered in a destructive manner in the affairs of the Weimar Republic and has later armed the III. Reich .

„Hitler is a great man“ (Lloyd George 1936) – „A communist Russia is in England’s national interest“ (Lloyd George, Prime Minister, 1918). Bild: East Anglia Film Archive.

In the 1920s, representatives of the US financial sector have bankrolled the Hitler movement and have thus destabilized the young German democracy early on. New York investment bankers Averell Harriman and Prescott Bush (ancestor of two US presidents) have provided more than 1,000,000 US dollars to the nascent party of Adolf Hitler in the 1920s – at todays value of $ 42.6 million[1][2]. New York investment banker Clarence Dillon was financier to Fritz Thyssen, Germany’s main sponsor of Adolf Hitler [3]. Thus Thyssen was able to save his Vereinigte Stahlwerke and retain ownership throughout the world economic crisis of 1929 [4].

The Hapag shipping company controlled by Averell Harriman attacked the German government in 1932 when it made a last ditch effort to eliminate Hitler’s SA – which was equipped with American weapons [5].

Through a joint venture between the Standard Oil Company, New Jersey, USA, and I.G. Farben, Germany later received patents that were crucial to her war effort [6].

This effort was supported by the introduction of an ideology that was also “Made in the USA”. Henry Ford’s anti-Semitic book “The International Jew” of 1920 was formative for Heinrich Himmler (SS) [7] and Baldur von Schirach (Hitler-Jugend). The “American Eugenics Society”, founded in 1926, advocated the sterilization of “inferior elements”. Germany’s race ideologues were ferried free of charge to the international Eugenics conferences in the US [8] by Averell Harriman’s Hapag shipping company.

The English upper class was also involved in the betrayal of German democracy after the First World War.

In the 1920s, the Thule Society – forerunner of the Nazi party – was founded by a British agent[9]. Hitler’s book “Mein Kampf” – with the concept of a Germanic empire on Russian soil – was created in collaboration with Karl Haushofer, most likely an agent of the British MI6 [10].

The London Central Bank, then the most powerful financial outfit in the world, has purposefully induced the global economic crisis and the economic collapse of the Weimar democracy [11]. After the Nazi Party, which had previously received no more than 1 out of 3 votes, had been brought to power through secret negotiations led by a British-American-German banker [12], Germany experienced a full blown resumption of economic activity based on a recipe of the National Bank of England [13].

The objective of this intervention by the Anglo-American oligarchy was initially an anti-Russian regime change in Berlin and then a renewed and possibly long-lasting war between Germany and Russia, into which the Western powers would enter when the other parties were exhausted.

The basic condition of the US has not changed since then. The US is not a democracy but is governed today by an oligarchy. This is the result of an extensive scientific study carried out in 2014[14]. The hallmark of oligarchies are indirect influence, selfishness, and betrayal.

Germany was betrayed by the Anglo-American oligarchy after 1918 in order to incite her against Russia for geopolitical reasons. That was painful, because to many Germans after the First World War, the US appeared to be exemplary because of its technical, industrial and social progress. American culture found a lot of German friends. American politics seemed to be far away from European quarrels. Its president had spoken out for bringing the war to an end.

In modern Ukraine, the United States have conspired for many years towards the 2014 overthrow of an elected, moderate government [15] which was replaced by an aggressively anti-Russian Nazi-regime. It is the first time since World War II that politicians who relate directly to the Third Reich, came to power in Europe.

They include:

Andriy Parubiy, secretary of the National Council on Security and Defence, co-founder of the National-Socialist Party of Ukraine (with Oleh Tyahnybok)

Dmytro Yarosh, deputy secretary of the National Security and Defence Council, leader of Stepan Bandera Treezoob and right sector.

Oleksandr Sych, Deputy Prime Minister, member of the party Svoboda.

Ihor Tenyukh, Defense Minister, as well as three other ministers who are also members of the party Svoboda.

Oleh Makhnitsky, Prosecutor General of Ukraine, member of the party Svoboda.

Both in the 1920s and today the US employed duplicitous, conflict-generating policies which include profound meddling in the internal affairs of previously peaceful countries.

In Germany the creeping regime change that was set in motion after 9/11 has now been accelerated against the backdrop of a sluggish Russia containment. The refugee crisis of 2015 is orchestrated in every detail by the Anglo-American oligarchy [16][17]. The near term objective is a Euro-Arab regime change in Germany. The long term goal is an unstable, dictatorial continent whose population is structurally incapable of resistance.

]]>https://tauroggen-e.net/2015/09/20/weimar-ukraine-treason-is-a-master-from-new-york-and-london/feed/0christophnikolaus„Hitler ist ein großer Mann“ (Lloyd George 1936) – „Ein kommunistisches Rußland ist im englischen Interesse“ (Lloyd George, Premierminister, 1918). Bild: East Anglia Film Archive.Reply to open letter of six Stalingrad veterans to Angela Merkel of February 2015https://tauroggen-e.net/2015/09/16/reply-to-open-letter-of-six-stalingrad-veterans-to-angela-merkel-of-february-2015/
https://tauroggen-e.net/2015/09/16/reply-to-open-letter-of-six-stalingrad-veterans-to-angela-merkel-of-february-2015/#commentsWed, 16 Sep 2015 12:22:10 +0000http://tauroggen-e.net/?p=105Continue reading Reply to open letter of six Stalingrad veterans to Angela Merkel of February 2015→]]>In February 2015 six Stalingrad veterans have sent an open letter to Mrs. Angela Merkel: Russian, German, English . A reply: German.

We are descendants of the German war generation and answer your letter to German Chancellor Angela Merkel from February 2015.

We understand that it hurts you, that in Ukraine – the heartland of Russian culture – a Nazi movement has spread. We understand that you are worried that people who stand by their Russian roots, are persecuted by a dictatorial regime. We understand that you have doubts about the meaning of your war effort of 1941-1945 and the meaning of the sacrifices of this war, now that this undignified racket was possible in the middle of peace time with European support. And that you fear that German politicians might have learned nothing and that these politicians believe that they can impose on Russia whatever they feel is opportune. We understand that you are concerned that the age of wars in Europe could not yet be over. And that you are afraid that we might again be forced to fight each other.

We believe that the Ukraine policy of the United States, the European Union, and Germany can be seen as a betrayal of Russia. We feel your pain at this betrayal.

We condemn this betrayal and apologize to you for the lies and opportunism of German media and German politicians.

It was not in our name, that the European supported regime in Kiev burned dozens of protesters in Odessa two months after taking office on May 2, 2014 . We condemn that civilians are being attacked with cluster bombs and rocket launchers in Eastern Ukraine . We mourn with you for the victims of aggression that was funded by the International Monetary Fund IMF with our tax money. We think lovingly of Inna Kukuruza who was the first victim in Lugansk on June 2, 2014 – torn apart during an air raid and bled to death on the street [1].

The majority of Germans in 2014 were against an expansion of sanctions against Russia [2]. Sixty prominent Germans – including former President Roman Herzog and former Chancellor Gerhard Schröder have published an appeal for peace to the Federal Government, the Bundestag, and the media on 5 December 2014 in the newspaper DIE ZEIT [3].

Unfortunately, this call for moderation was suppressed by our state funded television and radio stations [4]. Propagandistic counterfeits are common with these stations. The number of formal complaints against our radio and TV program has now reached its highest level since the founding of the Federal Republic [5]. The majority of Germans – 63% – have no trust in the Ukraine related media coverage according to a poll taken at the end of 2014 [6].

We wish to create a just world with Russia, America, and Europe.

We would like to encourage you to be hopeful about the future for another reason as well. We are convinced that in the West today there are independent minded officers that will refuse to obey irresponsible politicians in due time. One good part of our joint military traditions includes the Convention of Tauroggen that was signed on 30 December 1812, at the end of the Franco-Russian War. At that time, the Prussian General Yorck, an independent minded officer, agreed with Tsar Alexander on the neutralization of the Prussian corps. With this agreement which was initially concluded against the wishes of his king, the liberation of Europe from Napoleon took its course as well as the alliance of Russia, Prussia and Austria, which brought a peace of 100 years to Europe.

We are fond of Pushkin’s novel Eugene Onegin. A figurehead of the St. Petersburg society, Onegin visits the country side and meets the natural Tatyana Larina. For Pushkin Tatyana Larina is the perfect Russian woman, “Russian in her soul.” Her naturalness, spiritual purity and moral steadfastness have fascinated German readers of all times. She falls in love with Onegin and boldly writes him a letter:

“That is heaven’s will – that I am yours;
My life till now was but a pledge,
Of meeting with you, a forward image;
You were sent by heaven of that I’m sure,
To the grave itself you are my saviour…
In dreams you have appeared to me,
Though yet unseen, I held you dear,
Your glance and strangeness tortured me,
To my soul your voice was loud and clear
From long ago… It was not a dream!
You came, and I knew that very instant,
I was struck dumb, my heart flared up,
And in my thoughts said “He is the one!”

„And then she set her tired eyes on
Her husband; soon after she was gone.
Onegin stood rigid, like a stone. …
There is no doubt. Alas! Yevgeny
Adores Tatyana as a foolish child;
In the torture of love’s misery
He spends his days and useless nights“ .

We do not wantthatGermanysuffersthe fateofEugene Onegin. We appreciate yourcountryand what it doesfor peaceand each of usis doingeverythingin his powerto bring the US-controlledgovernmentin Berlinto its senses.It is our desireto live with Russia in freedom and on the basisof Christian values.

]]>https://tauroggen-e.net/2015/09/16/reply-to-open-letter-of-six-stalingrad-veterans-to-angela-merkel-of-february-2015/feed/2christophnikolausHerzThe Weapon Of Mass Migration And The Angel Of 1813https://tauroggen-e.net/2015/08/29/the-weapon-of-mass-migration-and-the-angel-of-1813/
https://tauroggen-e.net/2015/08/29/the-weapon-of-mass-migration-and-the-angel-of-1813/#commentsSat, 29 Aug 2015 10:14:17 +0000http://tauroggen-e.net/?p=86Continue reading The Weapon Of Mass Migration And The Angel Of 1813→]]>Context

Spiritually independent man is the enemy number one of Western and ecclesiastical metaphysicists of power. His abolition is the prime objective of the ideology of “diversity” and of the Jesuits. Upheavals of the political setup occur when the masses wake up (Perestroika) or are preoccupied with themselves (9/11).

Since 9/11, a pre-planned gradual Sovietization of the West takes place. With the Patriot Act, the abolition of habeas corpus (NDAA), mass surveillance, torture, and financial dictatorship, the walls of the new GuLag are raised brick by brick. The Soviet system of 1917 – initiated as a multicultural dictatorship – had lost its effectiveness under the onslaught of dissidents and the awakening of national consciousness. It was dissolved in 1989 by Western intelligence services and by subverted parts of the Eastern intelligence establishment. The Soviet peoples were subjected to a drastic materialistic treatment.

Putin is dangerous because he has disempowered the Eastern oligarchy and has refused to re-introduce a dictatorship. A very bad example for Americans and Germans, whose march into a multicultural dictatorship is now accelerated and flanked by millions of “illegals” and “refugees”.

In Germany “Asyl” also is the counterattack of the US dominated MSM (“Lügenpresse”) who have lost the information war on Ukraine in 2014. Pragmatically, mass migration allows US oligarchs to control the Hinterland after the Intermarium has been upgraded militarily to become a new Ostfront (Eastern front). A specifically German symptom is their apparent loss of identity – coming all the way from the Bauhaus building, Mercedes driving affluent citizens of the 50s and 60s to the “Roth-Front” agents of decay of today.

Assumptions

1. The Anglo-Saxon oligarchy was severely traumatized by the rise of the Bismarck empire and the German haughtiness of the time. The oligarchy still lives in a state of tension (experienced by the author in talks with young British and Americans)

2. World War I was a conventional siege prepared by the Anglo-Saxon oligarchy during the preceding decades (Tarpley, Preparata, Steiner)

3. With the acknowledgment of war guilt in 1919, Germany has allowed herself to be intellectually decapitated and was tossed from the stage of world history (Steiner)

4. World War II was initiated in 1917/18 (Preparata, Tarpley, Sutton, Sutton) with the aim of a complete physical annihilation of Central Europe.

5. The Anglo-American oligarchy exercises world domination not by direct coercion but through the control of public opinion (Mohler, Ziesel)

6. The migration weapon of 2015 is guided by two arms of the oligarchy: the CIA-affiliated NGO scene and the City of London (Riseup, Barclays Private Equity)

7. Difficulties are God’s loving instructions for cleaning our character – and this applies to individuals and peoples (Lazarev, Steiner, Christ).

First Part Of The German Uprising

In 2014, the oligarchy and its 5th column in the MSM unexpectedly suffered a crushing defeat.

By uncovering the lies on Ukraine, Germany’s media, the reliable cornerstone of the postwar order, became ineffective over night.

“Published opinion” and their political appendices in Berlin were washed away by the multitude of indignant complaints and appeals – which occurred of all things during the 100th anniversary of the English war.

In parallel, the Germans have begun to abolish one grand delusion of the post-war regime after the other.

The arrogant reactivation of Nazism against Russia marks the beginning of the end for the oligarchy. Brzezinski’s Kiev coup was one victory too much.

What Was Blazing The Way In Germany In 2014?

Which just angel has guided Germany in the last year?

It was the angel of 1813.

In righteous anger the Germans, who had been tormented and deceived for decades, have finally risen up. They rose up like the East Prussian estates after the speech of Count Yorck in February 1813, and like all Prussia after the call of the King in March 1813th

It was about time.

Because it is one thing to be publicly punished for imperial Germany’s arrogance and for a violent ideology (with Anglo-American origins, as it turns out).

But it is completely different matter if you are then lied to for a further 70 years. It is a completely different matter if you are then forced to collaborate with violent Galician offenders (driven by old imported demons) against Russia and to play the daredevil jumping jack again for the oligarchs. It is a completely different matter to willfullyhurt the tormented Russian soul.

With their outburst of 2014, the Germans have not only achieved within a year what seemed impossible for 70 years. Rather, they have reversed the tables for all to see: the roles of 1919 are now reversed.

The alleged victims are the perpetrators. The Anglo-American oligarchy are the jealous, perverted, murderous relatives who put to the sword all those who stand in the way of their lust for power and their greed.

“The German question is open and for the US it will decide the next 20 years”.

Clearly stated by the good, old, honest George Friedman in 2015 in Chicago. So it looks pretty bad for the oligarchy.

For the Angel of 1813 is the Angel Of Righteousness.

With the Angel Of 1813, Germany has reported back to history. This angel does not want a controlling Germany, but it wants a Central Europe, which strives for truth, beauty, and goodness. It wants the evolution of the human soul to continue. This will not happen with the petrified materialist or degenerate animal movements coming from the increasingly dictatorial West. This will only be possible with a Central Europe enjoying intellectual freedom.

2014 offers an overwhelming chance for Germany to return to its core. Historically this point is located before the Wilhelmine Empire with its material ambition and the displacement of original German culture by the Prussian state hagiography.

If post-Napoleonic Germany had solved its social question, as suggested by Goethe, the German power state would not have been required. That Bismarck did not however undertake a single step without his banker Bleichroeder – whose international partners knew the oligarchic psyche very well – increases our suspicion regarding the construction of 1871 (because it looks like a planned accident).

Importantly: Bismarck is not Germany. Kaiser Wilhelm is not Germany. Novalis, Goethe, Fichte, Hegel, Kant, Yorck, and Steiner are Germany.

Consequences Of 2014

The de facto repeal of the lie of Versailles in 2014 could not remain without an answer. The migration weapon and the European financial warfare in the summer of 2015 were designed to move the Germans back to the place of evil, a place assigned to them by the oligarchy 100 years ago. And of course, all migrants will receive a German passport, the right to vote, and Germany’s washed-up NATO media will get all the “xenophobic” attacks from the Constitutional “Protection” Agency (Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz) that they can feature.

This is what Central Europe’s best representative had to say about it 200 years ago:

Even from stones that are a placed in your way, you can build something beautiful (Goethe)

The Angel Of Righteousness, and the Angel Of Freedom are saying today:

Only from stones which are a placed in your way, you can build something beautiful.

Germany’s bourgeois do-gooders of 2015 still resonate with the convenience of patronization of 1919 and 1945. Their indignation against disturbance of the peace is reminiscent of mentally sluggish slaves who defend their fat old masters. The time of convenience is over however and these poor souls have not yet discovered themselves.

Forecast

The Angel Of Freedom and the Angel Of Righteousness are invincible. The rapid advances and changes since 2014 are proof positive.

The little bit of power in Berlin, we will take in passing.

The little bit of military alliance with Russia and China will be added on the same day.

The oligarchy will offer us a well-prepared financial crisis and a dictatorship.

This offer will the Germans will refuse.

Arrogance and spiritual paralysis are diseases of the Anglo-American empire. The secular outrage of millions of children murdered and abused in the West does not belong to us.

We are with the mentally and materially suffering people of the West. We are with the talented people of the West, whose skills we acknowledge and with whom we want to build a sustainable and just world.

We do not need the financial soufflé.

We want to be rich on our own.We want to be free on our own.We want a long friendship with Russia, which is also rich and free on its own.We want a long friendship with the West, which is rich and free on its own.

]]>https://tauroggen-e.net/2015/08/29/the-weapon-of-mass-migration-and-the-angel-of-1813/feed/1christophnikolausGeneral Yorck And The Beauty Of Military Disobedience In View Of Diplomatic Incompetencehttps://tauroggen-e.net/2015/08/27/general-yorck-and-the-beauty-of-military-disobedience-in-view-of-political-incompetence/
https://tauroggen-e.net/2015/08/27/general-yorck-and-the-beauty-of-military-disobedience-in-view-of-political-incompetence/#commentsThu, 27 Aug 2015 14:24:15 +0000http://tauroggen-e.net/?p=73On December 30,1812 – the French armyisin retreat–Lieutenant GeneralYorck, commanderof the Prussianauxiliary corpsin the Franco-Russian war, signs a truce withRussianGeneral Diebitsch.

]]>https://tauroggen-e.net/2015/08/27/general-yorck-and-the-beauty-of-military-disobedience-in-view-of-political-incompetence/feed/1christophnikolausFederal Republic of Germany Deposits Document For Resigning From NATO with US State Departmenthttps://tauroggen-e.net/2015/08/02/federal-republic-of-germany-deposits-document-for-resigning-from-nato-with-us-state-department/
https://tauroggen-e.net/2015/08/02/federal-republic-of-germany-deposits-document-for-resigning-from-nato-with-us-state-department/#respondSun, 02 Aug 2015 18:31:16 +0000http://tauroggen2020.wordpress.com/?p=25Continue reading Federal Republic of Germany Deposits Document For Resigning From NATO with US State Department→]]>Berlin, 12/30/2020 (Tauroggen). The Ambassador of the Federal Republic of Germany in the United States, Dr. von Seydlitz has yesterday deposited the document for the resignation of the Federal Republic of Germany from the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation in accordance with § 13 of the Treaty of 4.4.1949 with the US State Department. This was explained today by the spokesman of the Foreign Ministry, Dr. von Bülow, at the Federal Press Conference in Berlin.