‘The Fukushima Disaster Is Going To Finish The Japanese’

Independent scientist Leuren Moret, MA, PhD (ABD) has declared that the governments of Japan, the U.S. and Canada are continuing in a concerted, lock-step program of complicit cover-up of dangerous radiation levels resulting from the Fukushima nuclear false flag event of March 11, 2011.

Ms. Moret’s statements are made in an ExopoliticsTV interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre released August 14, 2011. Also made public is a court Declaration on the impacts and levels of Fukushima radiation by Dr. Chris Busby, Member of the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology and the Ukraine Committee Physicians of Chernobyl. Dr. Busby’s court Declaration, filed in a Japanese court case seeking to force the evacuation of more that 350,000 children from the Fukushima area, is set out at the end of this article in the public interest.

Japan, U.S., Canadian governments complicit

DOE/Japan – Misleading radiation surveys and maps.

Ms. Moret reveals that her research has uncovered that the misleading radiation surveys and maps released by the Japanese government purportedly of radiation levels from the Fukushima area were in fact documents originally authored and created by the U.S. Department of Energy and then passed secretly on to the government of Japan, which made them public as its own or released them jointly with the US government.

Ms. Moret states, “Challenging the official Japan/US government radiation surveys, the Japanese government television network NHK TV, released a documentary in April 2011, about independent scientists Dr. Shinzo Kimura (formerly Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare), Dr. Masaharu Okano (retired leading expert in Japan on environmental radiation), and Dr. Keiji Imanaka (Kyoto Univ.) and others, who began on March 15, to make the first ever independent radiation survey after a major nuclear disaster. Not only did this survey identify and measure very short half-life isotopes, never reported before following a nuclear disaster, but NHK TV immediately released it to the public. On March 16, the day that Reactor Unit 2 exploded at Fukushima nuclear plant, Dr. Kimura took soil and air samples at the Tamura Municipal Junior High School 35 kilometers from the Fukushima plant. He reported that a soil sample from a path used daily by students, was contaminated with 5,150,000 Bq/m2 of Iodine 131, as well as 9 other radionuclides. Radiation in the air sample was 1.9-93 microSv/hr, more than 40 times higher than normal. When they entered the 20 km exclusion zone, the radiation levels inside the car reached 300 microSv/hr. They also reported that the Cesium contamination level 4 km from the Fukushima plant was 2000 times higher than 44 km away from the plant. The importance of this careful and thorough survey, conducted by Japan’s top radiation scientists in Fukushima Prefecture, will increase over time.”

Thus, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), under the directorship of Dr. Steven Chu (Secretary of Energy) and Dr. Stephen Koonin, is following in the Fukushima HAARP-radiation false flag operation the same methodology that they followed in the BP Gulf Oil Spill false flag operation.

Ms. Moret states, “Dr. Steven Chu received a $500 million grant from BP Oil prior to being appointed Secretary of Energy by newly elected President Obama. Obama also received $500 million from the British Crown two years prior to his election, to begin his election campaign for US President.. Upon his appointment as Secretary of Energy, Dr. Steven Chu appointed Dr. Stephen Koonin, chief scientist for BP, to run the DOE’s science operations. The Queen of England personally owns BP.”

Ms. Moret states, “Together, DOE/BP’s Secretary of Energy Steven Chu and Dr. Stephen Koonin are doing the same thing at Fukushima that they did at the BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill with full approval by President Obama. Dr. Chu and Dr. Koonin increased the exposure of the population both at Fukushima (radiation) and at the Gulf of Mexico oil spill (toxins), and they acted within the U.S. government on behalf of President Obama, so that effective action to prevent exposure could not be taken. With full Presidential oversight, the U.S. Government is increasing radiation exposure in the northern hemisphere from Fukushima, through Secretary of Energy Chu and Dr. Koonin on behalf of their benefactors the British crown and BP, with the same depopulation agenda result they had at the BP Gulf oil spill.”

Self-serving by Japanese government & Tepco officials

Leuren Moret states, “Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano declares on August 13, 2011 that the Fukushima area is safe, which is a lie. Fukushima Diary has reported that the Japanese Cabinet knew that a nuclear meltdown was happening at Fukushima and has kept Fukushima residents from evacuating the area. Immediately after the March 11, 2011 Fukushima event, it has emerged that Tepco and Japanese government took over all buses in the Fukushima area for their own evacuation and never notified the population of the radiation hazard to themselves and their families. Moreover, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano evacuated his family to Singapore after the Fukushima event and had their radiation diagnosis records sealed at hospital.”

Ms. Moret states, “Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano must have taken his cue to evacuate his family from President Obama. Right after the Fukushima disaster, Obama took his wife and children to the southern hemisphere for several weeks, avoiding exposure to the high levels of radiation blanketing the United States, and did not mention the great danger of radiation exposure to citizens of the United States.”

Canada, U.S., and Japan are acting in concert

Ms. Moret states, “Canada is following the U.S. direction in covering up the Fukushima global radiation genocide event. Both the U.S. and Canadian governments shut down their monitoring in concert immediately after the March 11, 2011 Fukushima radiation event. Canada moved its radiation stations from the Pacific coast to the B.C. interior. Both the Canadian and U.S. governments continue to state that the radiation levels are safe, when in fact that is incorrect.”

Ms. Moret continues, “People in the Vancouver, BC, Seattle, San Francisco, and Arizona areas reported a salty taste in their mouths when it rained, which is a sign of radioactive cesium salts in the air.”

Ms. Moret says, “Eastern cities in the U.S. (New York and Washington, DC) and in Canada (Toronto) were protected from radiation from Fukushima that had been targeted at the West coast of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico by means of high pressure zones that were created by the weather warfare capabilities of HAARP to protect Toronto, New York, and Washington, DC from radiation fall-out, while having hazardous levels of radiation targeted at the west coasts of the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and Hawaii.”

Infant mortality spikes in the U.S., Canada, and Japan

Leuren Moret states, “Infant mortality has spiked 35% along the west coast of the U.S. in such cities as Berkeley, Santa Cruz, Spokane, and Seattle. The B.C. coroner has noted the spike in infant mortality in B.C. province (Canada) following the Fukushima March 11, 2011 event. Yet Dr. Janette Sherman was attacked when she published these facts. But those challenging her discovered a 45% spike in infant mortality in Portland, Seattle, Spokane and Vancouver. This of course was due to higher rainfall and higher rainout of radiation in those areas.”

Fukushima nuclear radiation false flag triggered by HAARP

Leuren Moret states, “Scientific researchers have provided substantial scientific evidence that indicates Fukushima was a HAARP triggered event preceded by ionospheric heating from the Tromso, Norway, HAARP facility until three days before the earthquake, and shortly before the earthquake by the 2.5 Hz earthquake causing frequency from the Gakona Alaska HAARP facility (US). The Tromso, Norway HAARP facility was funded by the Wallenberg Scandinavian bankers and is owned by UK, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Germany, Japan, and China.

Ms. Moret continues, “A research paper published in “Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk” Volume 1, Issue 2, 2010, by two Japanese wireless transmissions scientists, provided new evidence that earthquakes suspected to be HAARP triggered (ULF anomaly) events, were preceded by at least a week of ULF frequencies, and the scientists were able to triangulate from the earthquake focus back to the actual transmitters that the ULF signals originated from, more specifically the Kobe earthquake (1995) and an earlier earthquake near Niigata north of Kanto or Tokyo region. Other earthquakes preceded by the ULF anomaly were Loma Prieta in San Francisco Bay area, Haiti earthquake, Sumatra earthquake, Izu swarm, Iwate, Kagoshima, Izu, Pitak, Miyagi, Guam, and Biak. The scientists also identified a swarm of ULF/VLF/LF transmitters in the Kanto region (Tokyo) with various types of magnetometers. Two receiving transmitters in Japan (JJY, JJI) and three foreign transmitters (NWC (Australian), NPM (Hawaii), NLK (USA)) were also identified. Temporal analysis of wireless transmissions associated with SE Asian earthquakes identified transmitter/receivers in Japan and NW Australia that were involved in triggering the earthquakes.

Leuren Moret states, “A pattern of infrared heating anomalies prior to the Fukushima earthquake, in the fault zone along the tectonic plate boundaries on the east side of Japan, were reported by NASA scientists in mid-May at MIT and reported on the TECHNOLOGY REVIEW website published by MIT. Seemingly inexplicable and rapid heating of the ionosphere [from Tromso, Norway] directly above the epicenter reached a maximum only three days prior to the quake, according to satellite observations, suggesting that directed energy emitted from transmitters [Tromso and Gakona] used in the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) may have been responsible for inducing the quake.”

Ms. Moret states, ” Scientists commenting on the MIT report also reported that the Tromso Norway HAARP facility was conducting ionospheric heating experiments (including two visiting Russian scientists) up to three days before the Fukushima earthquake. Tromso HAARP heating along the fault zone boiled water naturally occurring in the fault zone, causing steam to expand the “stuck” portions of the fault faces in the zone, allowing the energy locked in the fault zone to release by triggering the fault with a special frequency. A 2.5 HZ HAARP signal is known to be the earthquake triggering frequency used in the tectonic warfare program of HAARP. Days before the Fukushima earthquake, the 2.5 Hz signal was identified on transmissions from the HAARP magnetometer at the Gakona, Alaska, HAARP facility.”

Leuren Moret concludes, “The science supports my statement that the Fukushima earthquake was triggered by HAARP, ionospheric heating of the fault zone was conducted from the Tromso, Norway, HAARP facility, and the 2.5 HZ signal was transmitted from Gakona, Alaska. This is the solid scientific basis for my statements that are widely distributed across the world and have not been countered with scientific facts challenging my statements.

“The reality of the Fukushima nuclear power plant disaster is that any nuclear power facility or power plant in the world can now be converted to a nuclear tectonic event remotely and silently triggered by HAARP – a new kind of nuclear warfare carried out from a computer keyboard at any time and anywhere. The global community has no defense against this extremely lethal form of covert global tectonic nuclear warfare and it is threatening the very survival of the human race.”

Ms. Moret continues, “When Fukushima reactor #3 with plutonium melted down, that radiation was targeted for Tokyo via HAARP weather warfare capabilities. I have also noted that the highest levels of iodine and cesium over the U.S. were measured in the south of the U.S. during a period of HAARP-triggered tornadoes in late April 2011. I note that was during the period of the Royal Wedding (April 29, 2011) in the U.K., and that the British Crown and BP have been shown to have been behind both the Fukushima and the BP Gulf oil spill false flag events.”

Lawsuit to evacuate 350,000 children from Fukushima

Statement of Chris Busby in relation to provisional injunction against Education Committee of Koryama City, Fukushima to evacuate the children for the radioactively contaminated area being filed on 24th June 2011.

I will make a brief statement below which outlines the main considerations in this matter and I will conclude that the children and adults living in areas which are contaminated to the extent that the external gamma dose rate at 1m from the contamination surface exceeds 1μSv per hour should immediately relocate to an uncontaminated area. The continued presence of children in areas where greater than this level of external dose rate exists will have a serious health problems and these may lead to their deaths within the following ten years. Exposure of pregnant mothers to contamination at levels resulting in an excess dose rate at 1m from the ground of 1μSv per hour will have a significant effect on the viability of the fetus and the survival and health of the baby.

1.1 The case

As I understand it, this plea is for court to make an order to permit the evacuation of children living and attending schools in radioactively contaminated areas in the Fukushima prefecture.

1.2 My expertise

I have a First Class Honours Special degree in Chemistry from the University of London and also hold a Doctorate in Chemical Physics from the University of Kent. I was elected to the Royal Society for Chemistry in 1974 and I am presently a Member of the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology and the Ukraine Committee Physicians of Chernobyl. I am a scientific reviewer for The Lancet and The European Journal of Cancer, The Journal of Paediatric Radiology and the European Journal of Biology and Bioelectromagnetics and Science and Public Policy

I have studied the health effects of low dose radiation for more than 20 years and conducted research both at the fundamental cell biology level, theoretically and as a radiation epidemiologist. I have been a member of two UK government committees on this issue (Committee Examining Radiation Risks for Internal Emitters, CERRIE, and the Ministry of Defence Depleted Uranium Oversight Board). I also have officially advised British Government and other expert or investigative committees e.g. The Committee on Radioactive Waste Management (CORWM), the US Congressional Committee on Veterans Affairs and Security, The Royal Society, The House of Commons Enquiry into the health of A-Bomb veterans and the European Parliament. I am an official expert witness for the Canadian Parliament on the health effects of Uranium. I was until 2007 a fellow of the University of Liverpool in the Faculty of Medicine and I am currently Visiting Professor Department of Molecular Biosciences in the University of Ulster in Northern Ireland where I am supervising research on uranium photoelectron enhancement effects. I am also Guest Researcher at the Julius Kuhn Institute of the German Federal Agricultural Laboratories (FAL) in Brunswick near Hanover where I am examining the health effects of uranium exposure. I am Scientific Secretary of the European Committee on Radiation Risk (ECRR) based in Brussels (Comite Europeen Sur Le Risque de l’Irradiation (CERI) ) and senior editor of its report ECRR2003 Recommendations of the European Committee on Radiation Risk: The Health Effects of Ionising Radiation Exposure at Low Doses for Radiation Protection Purposes. This report has now been translated into French, Russian, Japanese and Spanish and has been used for radiation protection purpose scoping by many organisations including most recently (2006) the UK Committee on Radioactive Waste Management (CORWM). I also edited the latest ECRR report (ECRR2010). I was invited by the nuclear industry in the UK (CIRIA) to provide advice for best practice in the remediation of contaminated land based on the ECRR risk model. I was, between 2003 and 2006 Science Policy Interface Group Leader of the EU Policy Information Network for Child Health and Environment PINCHE and also the senior rapporteur on both Ionising Radiation and ultraviolet solar radiation effects on children’s health. I have acted as an expert witness in over 40 court cases in the UK and the USA on the issue of radiation and health

My particular area of expertise is the health effects of internally deposited radionuclides. I have made fundamental contributions to the science of radiation and health in this area and have published many articles and reports on this issue.

My researches have led me to the conclusion that the health consequences of exposure to internally deposited radionuclides cannot be either scientifically or empirically assessed using the averaging methods currently employed by risk agencies (ICRP, NCRP) based on the Japanese A-Bomb studies and other external high dose exposures. The radionuclide dose coefficients published by the ICRP and employed in calculations made by these organisations are unsound since they depend on inappropriate averaging of energy in tissue, as I shall elaborate. This is actually common sense; and it is increasingly seen to be so by many official radiation risk agencies and committees yet the historic weight of the conventional approach to radiation risk (with whole organisational and bureaucratic structures committed to the simplistic historic approaches) has prevented any change in policy in this area. Such an official acceptance of the scientific illegitimacy of the current radiation risk model for internal radiation exposures would have far reaching and financially costly policy implications.

1.3 Evaluating the health effects of exposures from Fukushima releases

The risk from exposure to ionising radiation is currently assessed by the Japanese authorities using the absorbed dose approach of the International Commission ion Radiological Protection. The ICRP approach is based on the belief that the health effects of exposure to ionising radiation may be linearly related to the absorbed dose of radiation received. There is now overwhelming evidence that this is not true for certain kinds of internal exposures, including the exposures received by children and adults in Fukushima prefecture following the explosion and melt down and the on-going fissioning of the nuclear reactors and spent fuel element tanks

Measurements made by MEXT and by various universities, agencies and individuals in areas near and remote from the site of the releases show that the levels of radioactivity may be assessed through contamination by a range of radionuclides and also by gamma dose rate measurements. The limits for exposure decided on by the Japanese authorities are based on external gamma dose rate measured in microSieverts μSv per hour. This enables the cumulative dose to be calculated and compared with the recommendations of the ICRP that no individual should have greater than 1mSv (1000 μSv) in any year. Many areas where children and adults are now living continuously have radiation dose rates greater than 1 μSv per hour. Thus being in such an area for more than 365hours will already exceed the ICRP recommendations. In many parts of the area where children go to school they have already exceeded this limit.

However the use of this limit is dangerously incorrect in areas contaminated with material from Fukushima for a number of reasons:

1. Many of the radioactive substances present in the Fukushima environment are not gamma emitters and will not be included in the gamma radiation data. Examples include the beta emitters Strontium 90, Barium 140, Plutonium 241, Tritium (radioactive water), the alpha emitters plutonium 238, 239, 240, uranium 238 and Uranium 235 and Amercium241. Thus the exposure is underestimated.

2. The environment contains alpha and beta emitting hot particles that are inhaled and ingested. These have now been detected in car air filters as far away as Tokyo. Their effects are extremely serious and we already hear reports of nosebleeds and diarrhoea resulting for the destruction of nasal passages and intestinal lining following exposure to these substances.

3. The internal radionuclides carry a far greater hazard in terms of their assessed dose than the same dose delivered externally. This is the position of the European Committee on Radiation Risk, an independent group of scientists and radiation experts of which I am the Scientific Secretary. The report ECRR2010 The Health Effects of Exposure to low doses of ionising radiation has been translated into Japanese (http://www.jca.apc.org/mihama/ecrr/ecrr2010_dl.htm )

4. The ECRR recommendation is that no member of the public should be exposed to any source from any man made process such that their total annual dose from all such sources is greater than 0.1mSv. This compares with the ICRP limit of 1mSv.

5. The status of the ERCRR and ICRP is equivalent. For an outline of the general position of the ECRR with regard to current radiation risk models see The Lesvos Declaration (www.euradcom.org/2009/lesvosdeclaration.htm )

The normal natural background gamma radiation dose rate in the Fukushima area is less than 0.1 μSv per hour. And increase above about 0.2 μSv per hour signals a source for this extra radiation. This source is fallout contamination from the reactor site. This fallout contamination, modelled as Caesium-137, can be assessed at 300kBq/sqm for every 1 μSv per hour above gamma background. The Chernobyl exclusion zone was defined as 500kBq/sq metre. Measurements of Cs-137 on the ground as far away as 60km from the reactor site have shown levels of Cs137 between 1000 and 10,000kBq/sq m. It is my expert opinion that to permit children to remain in areas where these levels of contamination exist is irresponsible, will result in certain ill health and mortality and cannot be condoned in any civilised society. It is particularly sad and ironic, in my opinion, that the country Japan which suffered first and so badly from the effects of the radiation from the atomic bomb is now destroying its own children and their parents as a result of slavishly following the recommendations of a risk agency dominated by the nuclear industry and its supporting scientists, recommendations which are based on a out-dated risk model which has been shown to be false by epidemiological and theoretical developments for at least 15 years.

Chris Busby

June 23rd 2011

END OF STATEMENT

Here is what the Japanese elite puppet government is really doing here:

Radiation exposure is increased by a factor of a trillion. Inhaling even the tiniest particle, that’s the danger.

Yo: So making comparisons with X-rays and CT scans has no meaning. Because you can breathe in radioactive material.

Hirose: That’s right. When it enters your body, there’s no telling where it will go. The biggest danger is women, especially pregnant women, and little children. Now they’re talking about iodine and cesium, but that’s only part of it, they’re not using the proper detection instruments. What they call monitoring means only measuring the amount of radiation in the air. Their instruments don’t eat. What they measure has no connection with the amount of radioactive material.

Dr. Helen Caldicott (Co-founder of Physicians for Social Responsibility):

You’ve bought the propaganda from the nuclear industry. They say it’s low-level radiation. That’s absolute rubbish. If you inhale a millionth of a gram of plutonium, the surrounding cells receive a very, very high dose. Most die within that area, because it’s an alpha emitter. The cells on the periphery remain viable. They mutate, and the regulatory genes are damaged. Years later, that person develops cancer. Now, that’s true for radioactive iodine, that goes to the thyroid; cesium-137, that goes to the brain and muscles; strontium-90 goes to bone, causing bone cancer and leukemia. It’s imperative … that you understand internal emitters and radiation, and it’s not low level to the cells that are exposed. Radiobiology is imperative to understand these days.”

… these are not “dosimeters” but “glass badges” that passively collect radiation information. It won’t help these children or their parents to avoid high-radiation areas and spots, it won’t tell them how much radiation they will have been exposed unless they are sent in to a company to interpret the data.

More and more information about the nature of exposure to this degree of radiation will be forthcoming. When someone’s health is put in severe jeopardy, that person has a right to know. Please let your friends know what they have been exposed to and what their children have been exposed to. I would want to know if my life and health had been severely compromised, often to the point of premature demise. They haver been and I am grateful to know why and who to responsible.