GMO’s and LABELING ~ Fracking

The Label GMO is Campaign Fraudulent because you cannot have anything Genetically Modified in Organic products. People are either forgetting this or never learned it.

GMO’s are already labeled…either by brand name or if it says Organic. …at least it was till the corporate overlords of conventional started the GMO Label Movement.

What many leaders in the label movement seem to forget on purpose is; Organic is supposed to mean GMO free…..yet not a one mention to their followers to protect Organic standards. …instead they wish to waste millions on marches and a new label which does absolutely nothing for the protection of our foods and water…..all the label does is allow for coexistence. Besides, the label is a multi-billion dollar profit for government, the same government who has allowed our children to be genocided against with impunity. The label makes money from true Organic, fake Organic and conventional poison toxic producers, not protectors.

The Label Movement wants the trusted safe government to place stickers all over their GMO foods while doing nothing to preserve organic standards. Yes, let’s pay for stickers…..who gets the processing fees for these stickers? Who gets the profits for labels? It’s either the government who poisoned your children or label leaders.

Organic isn’t protected under the label GMO Campaign; you can still spray NON GMO’s with toxic bio weapon pesticides.

Organic means the plants genes are unchanged “AND” they have NO chemical growth or death stimulants.

GMO free only means the plants genes haven’t been manipulated in a lab. That’s all it means.

You should be asking why won’t the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) tell you this…

Over 51% of the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) members are Monsanto shareholders or they are affiliated with them… This means they are conventional (GMO and Pesticide) food suppliers who own stock in Organic companies…. And this allows them to seat the NOSB which gives them rights to change laws defining what constitutes the term organic.

Conventional food suppliers define what is Organic or not because they now head the board…. They decide what will be called organic…. Corn sugar….Neotame, Canola, Natural flavorings (lab made msg) … Etc.

The USDA enforces the definition of Organic as defined by the NOSB, not the other way around. If the definition is changed at the top level, the USDA will enforce it.

GMO’s are extremely dangerous, but they have already contaminated the food supply…. It’s a done deal.

Even if you grow Non GMO crops in zones, the GMO crops surrounding them will just contaminate the Non GMO’s. The only way this contamination can be removed is to burn everything at the same time….

Conventional food makers know this, so they lose nothing by pretending to fight GMO labeling. This whole thing is an act. You are being manipulated.

While companies pretend to fight and lose the battle of GMO labeling, plants are still be sprayed with dangerous chemicals, something you also breathe, killing bees, contaminating livestock and feed, seeping into lakes and streams, polluting everything in its path as it travels into ocean waters destroying reefs and coral and poisoning fish.

If GMO’s have to be labeled, the only ones affected will be those trying to grow Organic…. They will be fined and shutdown because of cross contamination. This law does nothing to conventional food makers, it only criminalizes Organic producers!!!

What better way to take over the food supply and block Organic products from reaching the people.

You are being tricked into fighting the wrong battle. Labeling GMO doesn’t protect against chemical spraying. GMO free is “NOT” organic!!!!

We should be demanding the labeling of NON ORGANIC as originally written … No chemical additives, no lab manipulation and no gene splicing.

I don’t know if it’s this way in other countries, but here in the US, the GMO campaign is fake.

This misguided cult following needs to be exposed for what it really is… A rally for self genocide. There is zero win for people or the planet in this label GMO campaign. The same organizations will have more power in dictating what is considered food and medicines by the very same companies who own chemical agriculture, pharma, oil, media and banks….. aka……. “The War Makers.”

Why do want to only label poison products? Labeling is a joke and does nothing in the way for food protection except allow for coexistence. Labeling is multi billion dollar business which feasts from both organic and conventional and hands the money to our enemy. Protect organic standards and stop trying to get some stupid label while unintentionally demanding gmo coexistence. The OCA is a front groups for Monsanto.

There 4 types of organic.
1) sustainable
2) non-sustainable meaning it hurts or removes something important to grow this.
3) gmo free organic.
4) sustainable gmo free organic.
Anyone who uses #4 will proudly state this on the package. Many non organic companies now sell organic products. There are very few truly organic retailers anymore. That goes double for organic seed sellers. Research all your companies by using these ideas for keywords. “Company name + owned by + gmo + bought by + pesticides + Monsanto. Or “company name” linked to Monsanto gmo. That will help you find out who you support when you buy fake organics. Every single Monsanto company is linked to weapons, war and pharmaceuticals. You may be supporting self genocode with what your purchases. Buyer beware.

Once a product is accept as GMO free and allowed to carry the GMO free label, where does the money go? Who collects the fee? Does the money go back into protecting the soil? Does it pay for GM studies? Ever notice Organic and conventional both apply for the exact same label? Do the Leaders in the Label campaign get a cut from the profits of labeled products? Who profits from labeling? Does it go directly to a government agency? Isn’t it governments we fight to protect our food from? So by labeling we are either giving it to conventional suppliers, government or label leaders…..are these unfair questions to ask?

If proceeds for labeling go to government, but its government who are the bulletproof glass to biotech, doesn’t this mean we are paying the government to suppress our right to clean untainted food?

Labeling is a multi-billion dollar business created to get both conventional and Organic money. Never before have we seen opposing sides pay for the same label. Labeling allows for coexistence and is completely fraudulent!

In case you don’t know why the GMO Labeling Campaign is a fraud movement by reading thus far, then think on this….

Our agricultural system uses taxpayer money to subsidize planting GMO crops while Organic farmers are required to pay certification fees. Why are we spending millions of dollars on the labeling of poison products for consumption when we should be demanding the removal of harmful toxins and chemicals????!!!!!!!!!!!!

I am for the protection of my planet, not for my entitlements! I’m against labeling because it does absolutely nothing to protect ourselves, our planet or our children from these genocide makers!

“Please explain why you are demanding labeling for toxic foods when we should be banning them?”

WHY CANOLA OIL IS UNHEALTHY

Canola oil has been lauded as heart-healthy since it’s very low in saturated fat, and saturated fat continues to be vilified despite its connection with heart disease being debunked time and time again. And though the majority of its fatty acid content is monounsaturated — the same as olive oil — there are a number of reasons why canola oil is absolutely, 100% NOT a healthy fat option.1. CANOLA OIL WOULD NEVER EXIST IN NATURE
This is a big red flag upfront! Unlike coconut, olive, and avocado oils — which can be cold-pressed and easily extracted — canola oil extraction involves high heat, intense pressure, deodorization, and solvents and also degrades the oil.2. CANOLA OIL IS EXTREMELY PRO-INFLAMMATORY
Canola oil is very high in omega-6 essential fatty acids, which initiate the inflammatory process. This is a big problem considering the modern diet is devoid in omega-3 essential fatty acids, which initiate the anti-inflammatory process. While we ought to be consuming omega-6 and omega-3 essential fatty acids in a 1:1 to 4:1 ratio, the average American consumes them in a 10:1 to 20:1 ratio! This means that we are over-inflaming without being able to properly anti-inflame. The systemic inflammation that results increases the risk of illness and chronic disease, from heart disease to arthritis.3. MOST CANOLA OIL IS LIKELY RANCID BEFORE YOU EVEN BUY IT
A large percentage of the fatty acids in canola oil are polyunsaturated, which are highly unstable and go rancid easily. Considering that most canola oil is extracted using high heat and sold in clear bottles (allowing light to oxidize the oil), most canola oil is likely rancid by the time it reaches store shelves. The rancidity of canola oil increases its pro-inflammatory effect.4. OVER 90% OF CANOLA OIL IS GENETICALLY MODIFIED
Most non-organic canola oil is produced from GMO rape seed, designed be resistant to the herbicide RoundUp. Though a controversial and debated subject, the bottom line is that genetically modified seeds are not a product of nature but of a lab, and no long-term studies have been conducted on the safety of these man-made foods. According to the Center for Food Safety, research does point to a number of very serious health concerns as a result of consuming genetically modified foods: certified organic foods CAN be produced with genetically modified seed because there is ABSOLUTELY NO SUCH THING AS ORGANIC CANOLA OIL!**** Organic means the plants genes are unchanged “AND” they have NO chemical growth or death stimulants. The term organic in this instance is not sprayed with “conventional” pesticides. Organic isn’t protected under the label GMO Campaign; you can still spray NON GMO’s with toxic bio weapon pesticides. GMO free only means the plants genes haven’t been manipulated in a lab.5. HARSH SOLVENTS ARE USED TO EXTRACT CANOLA OIL
The canola oil extraction and refining process typically involves toxic petroleum solvents such as hexane, which is known to cause nerve-damage. There is some concern about trace amounts of these solvents in the final product.

Currently, up to 93% of U.S. corn is genetically engineered and 94 percent of soy grown in the United States were genetically modified. GMO sweet corn is genetically engineered to be herbicide resistant (Roundup Ready POISON). A number of studies over the past decade have revealed genetically engineered foods can pose serious risks to farmers, human health, domesticated animals, wildlife and the environment. Despite these long-term and wide-ranging risks, Congress has yet to pass a single law intended to manage them responsibly. The haphazard and negligent agency regulation of biotechnology has been a disaster for consumers and the environment. Unsuspecting consumers by the tens of millions are purchasing and consuming unlabeled GE foods, despite a finding by U.S. Food & Drug Administration scientists that these foods could pose serious risks.

It starts with feeding grass grazing animals corn. Farmers get subsidized by the government for growing corn. Cows are fed the excess corn supply. They lack the enzyme to digest the corn in their guts. E. coli bacteria develops in the cow incubator, also causing excess methane gas contributing to climate change, and then the cow is confined up to their waists in their own excrement contaminated with the E.coli. The E.coli enters the food supply during the slaughtering process. This is pretty much the reason for antibiotics. Dumb government policy and poor husbandry practices. Cows eat grass, not corn… Unless it’s all they have.

Rudy: The morons in the label movement want the trusted safe government to place stickers all over their GMO foods while doing nothing to preserve Organic standards. Yes, let’s pay for stickers…..who gets the processing fees for these stickers? Who gets the profits for labels? It’s either the government who poisoned your children or label leaders. But I’m the narcissistic because I’m bringing this to your attention…..I’m the Monsanto shill …….but those who have physical ties aren’t….. did you hit your fucking head on the way in? Can you not see Anne Temple, Zen Honeycutt, Tami Canal and Angie Morelli are promoting genocidal biotechnology by avoiding the one and only action they could have easily shared with you? Instead of allowing information to be shared, they call fake anonymous to attack me. Bring it on dead heads…..I ain’t fracturing your pathetic movement, you are, by lying. ….and people realize it! You’ve been found out and you have nothing left to do except tell the truth or keep denying it like the cheap common crooks, cheats and liars you are. Cowards.

RUDY: #1 believed lie. Organics can not feed the world. Total and complete bullshit! The only reason organics are not able to feed the planet at this time is because the space is being used for the sole purpose of creating toxic so called food. If you plant asparagus it eats up the toxins from the ground. (What do you do with all that toxic asparagus?) There is a fungus that can consume toxins so completely the toxins from pesticides and GMO;s are not put back into the earth. They are gone forever! It takes 2-4 years to clean the soil back to almost total organic if using the asparagus method. (I’m more than sure there are other plants who make this go even faster) It takes 7 years to clean up the soil if all you do is stop using pesticides and GMO’s. During that time, there are many people who could care less less if they consume that kind of food. They would be willing to buy it. Hell, i would be willing to eat it if this is the route we would be willing to go. If we started removing the toxic field farms right now, we could have 100% organic meals for everyone on this land in 2-4 years. So remember that when someone regurgitates the lie that organics cannot feed the planet, then shove that statement down their throats!!!!.

1. GMO’s are not what farmers have been doing for thousands of years, that is selective breeding and grafting.2. Think about it: If there is a “Healthy Food” section in the market, what does that make the rest of the food?3. Please explain and please be specific. No conjecture.4. Please source your statistics.5. Be so kind as to give us a couple of examples with at least some accreditation.6. I’m sure you would rather big brother telling you what to wear, eat, sleep, drive,7. Your question is actually a putdown designed to boost your ego. Good luck with that.8. critics are generally motivated by envy.9. because I thought it was worth my time to refute what I believed was bad logic. I don’t always respond just to connect with the person who made a comment; sometimes there’s really no point in that, though occasionally it’s possible to get someone to rethink something; however, there are others reading, who will weigh both sides and make their own decision. I’m usually aiming at them.10. I suggest you take your head out of the sand. Did you even bother to read the whole thing and actually understand it? NO, you didn’t. Come back when you can launch a real argument based on facts.11. more irresponsible advice from a pseudo scientist.”12. nice try at deflection13. ignore crucial evidence14. You are wrong and a bit narcissistic, but quite entertaining.15. more irresponsible advice from a pseudo scientist.”16. Your pathetic contribution of ill-informed nonsensical pablum is boorish. But keep talking. I always yawn when I’m interested.17. Say what you mean and mean what you say but don’t push your hidden agendas and baseless beliefs onto other people when you refuse to accept proven data and statics and DO NOT have all the facts and.18. Provide a reputable source.19. It’s not the gluten, it’s the glyphosate. We are not allergic to food, we’re allergic to what’s been done to it.20. McDonalds Fries: Tertiary butylhydroquionone, or THBQ, is a type of phenol used in the foods in order to prevent deterioration of food. It is also used in substances such as perfumes and bio-diesel.21. McDonalds Fries: Hydrogenated soybean oil – People who consume it on regular basis can expect many, many unhealthy effects. According to the Women’s Hospital in Boston and the research conducted at the Harvard School of Public Health and the Brigham Young University, showed that at least 100,000 cardiac deaths in America every year could be prevented if people replaced trans fats with healthier non hydrogenated polyunsaturated or life-giving mono-saturated oils.22. McDonalds Fries: Dimethylpolysiloxane – a compound that is most commonly used in hair conditioners, silly putty and in aquarium tank sealants. However Dimethylpolysiloxane dealers also receive orders from McDonalds Corporation. This hazardous compound can even contain formaldehyde, a well-known toxic chemical that has been linked to cancer, allergies, brain damage, and autoimmune disorders.

There is no such thing as a GMO coconut, yet all coconut oils contain this GMO free label, and most coconut oils contain pesticides…..? Funny how the label doesn’t tell you what has never been gmo made…. or tells you what has pesticides and chemical fertilizer. Now why would companies pay for a label where a product has never been genetically modified, but has been sprayed with pesticides and tell you it’s healthy?

Famous food companies have been exposed by Natural News using tissue from aborted babies to make flavor additives in processed foods.
Kraft, PepsiCo, Nestle, work with Semonyx, a California-based that uses aborted embryonic cells to test fake flavoring chemicals.
The aborted human fetal cell line is known as “HEK-293,” and it is used to see how the human palate will react to synthetic flavors. Since most of today’s processed food lacks flavor, companies like Semonyx are hired to develop flavors on their own.

“What they don’t tell the public is that they are using HEK 293 — human embryonic kidney cells taken from an electively aborted baby to produce those receptors,” said Debi Vinned

ge of the pro-life group Children of God for Life. “They could have easily chosen animal, insect, or other morally obtained human cells expressing the G protein for taste receptors.”

EVERY DOLLAR SPENT AT STARBUCKS SUPPORTS GMO’S, EMPOWERS MONSANTO AND HURTS GRASSROOTS GMO LABELING EFFORTS.http://www.realfarmacy.com/still-starbucks-get-ready-never-want-again/ “In the past 2 years alone, Starbucks has been a part of a GMA-led coalition that has donated more than $70 million dollars to defeat GMO labeling efforts in California and Washington State. By opposing GMO labeling, Starbucks has willingly climbed in bed with Monsanto and the GMA and is intentionally misleading customers about their commitment to “sustainability” and “ethical sourcing”.

On March 4, 2014, Green America’s GMO Inside announced the launch of an anti-GMO campaign aimed to pressure Starbucks to stop using milk sourced from cows raised on GMO feed. So far the campaign has sent an impressive 150, 505 letters to Starbucks through the combined efforts of GMO Inside, Food Democracy Now!, OrganicConsumers Association, and Friends of the Earth.

Starbucks represents a significant battle on the anti-GMO front that could prove once again that direct action via grassroots activism can, in fact achieve what the ballot box cannot. If Starbucks, the largest coffee chain in the world with 23,187 stores in 64 countries dumps “Monsanto milk” and starts serving only organic, GMO-free milk at all their locations that victory alone could potentially influence other GMO guzzling food Behemoths to do the same. The fall of Starbucks could morph into a domino action of sorts.

Starbucks is partnered with Monsanto and does not support those who want all GM foods labeled. “As a dues paying member of the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), Starbucks has helped bankroll efforts to defeat GMO labeling in the US for the past two years.

Starbuck’s milk comes from factory farmed cows also known as CAFOs (concentrated animal feeding operations). These poor cows are massively injected with antibiotics throughout their lifecycle, and fed an unhealthy diet of GMO feed including: corn, soy, alfalfa, and cotton seed. Cows have normally grazed on grass in open fields until CAFOs came along.

According to the Organic Consumers Association (OCA) in 2011 Starbucks used over, “93 million gallons of milk per year, enough to fill 155 Olympic-sized swimming pools.” Of course, Starbucks has grown since then and no doubt the milk figures have climbed.

Starbucks represents a significant battle on the anti-GMO front that could prove once again that direct action via grassroots activism can, in fact achieve what the ballot box cannot. If Starbucks, the largest coffee chain in the world with 23,187 stores in 64 countries dumps “Monsanto milk” and starts serving only organic, GMO-free milk at all their locations that victory alone could potentially influence other GMO guzzling food Behemoths to do the same. The fall of Starbucks could morph into a domino action of sorts.

Starbuck’s milk comes from factory farmed cows also known as CAFOs (concentrated animal feeding operations). These poor cows are massively injected with antibiotics throughout their lifecycle, and fed an unhealthy diet of GMO feed including: corn, soy, alfalfa, and cotton seed. Cows have normally grazed on grass in open fields until CAFOs came along.

According to the OrganicConsumers Association (OCA) in 2011 Starbucks used over, “93 million gallons of milk per year, enough to fill 155 Olympic-sized swimming pools.” Of course, Starbucks has grown since then and no doubt the milk figures have climbed.

Back in 2007 the OCA successfully pressured Starbucks to stop using Monsanto’s rBGH growth hormone milk. However, Starbucks cleverly turned OCA’s victory into a disingenuous advertising claim by touting the fact that “since it stopped using milk that contains Monsanto’s rBGH growth hormone, it uses ‘GMO-free’ milk.” Nice try Monsanto!

Worth noting is the exponential rise in the use of antibiotics by Big Agri-business, which is undoubtedly a hidden factor behind the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, an undeniable health risk for all of us.

Voting with your dollars may ultimately be the best strategy to persuade them to change their Monsanto ways.

McCormick Seasonings: Victory! World’s Largest Spice Company to Go Organicand Non-GMO by 2016
RUDY…. Please note, they deliberately use the terms Organic”AND” non gmo……. Organicis already supposed to mean gmo free……. realize they are mucking the water on purpose.

We grow enough food to feed every single person on the planet, yet millions of people go to bed hungry. We currently as a species create enough food to feed 11 billion people and there is only 7.9 billion humans to feed, where is all this food going I hear you ask…on animal agriculture!! Is it just me or does anybody else find this is ridiculous??
Discover the startling facts about global food waste and what we can do to solve this problem. https://www.facebook.com/OvergrowTheSystem/

The FDA may consider a watered-down, voluntary GMO labeling rule which would exempt ingredients such as high fructose corn syrup and canola oil preempting State GMO labeling laws.

James Bell … There is no more scientific evidence that GMO’s are dangerous than that Global Warming is a hoax. Quit making stuff.

Kristeen T Hernandez to James Bell … I love when people use “un-scientifically collected” comments in their attempt to redirect other readers to unfounded conclusions by applying boldly fabricated and illogical assertion tactics. This means the truth and accuracy in media platform we’re utilizing is more likely to be universally accepted.

Therefore be so kind as to give us a couple of examples with at least some accreditation. Also please explain and be specific, no conjecture and source your statistics.

Aaron Baker · … James Bell

Well, you’re only kind of right. Currently, there is no scientific evidence that has come to light that shows the act of genetically modifying foods causes any measurable risk to humans. However, we’re in the relatively early stages of research into GMOs.

More importanly, though, is understanding how genetically modified food organisms are used. In the US, by far the most prevelant use of GMOs is to make food plants Roundup resistant. It has been repeatedly shown that the genetic modifications don’t take long to spread to the weeds trying to be controlled. This means they end up using MORE Roundup on GMO crops than they used to use on non-GMO crops. It’s the Roundup on our food that is dangerous, not so much the genetic modification.

Another objection to GMO food crops is that companies (particularly Monsanto) have modified crops so they don’t naturally reproduce. That means that farmers (commonly in Third World countries) cannot just keep the seeds from some of their crops and replant them the next year. They’re forced to buy more seed from the company.

Again, while the actual genetic modification may not be directly harmful (remember, it’s still rather early to be 100% certain), the modification is being used to enrich a small group of people at a very real cost to many other people. If someone doesn’t pay the company for more seed each year, it’s quite possible that malnourishment and even starvation can be the result – due to the genetic modification.

Julie K. McCarty … James Bell, GMOs and Global Warming are two entirely different things. And global warming has mountains of scientific evidence. And is over a hundred years old. And as Aaron Baker pointed out, the science of GMOs is relative young as to whether it directly harmful to humans. So, far the science says no.

Angel Andrews … Easy Tip: If your food has a lable – or comes in a box, bag or can – or contains “ingredients” …. it probably aint “natural”.

Anjahli Parnell … And the FDA doesn’t really care if food is actually healthy or not, or that the food is raised in a health concious way.

KRISTEEN I love when people use “un-scientifically collected” data in their attempt to redirect other readers to unfounded conclusions by applying boldly fabricated and illogical assertion tactics. This means the truth and accuracy in media platform we’re utilizing is more likely to be universally accepted.

Organicmeans the plants genes are unchanged “AND” they have NO chemical growth and NO death stimulants. PERIOD, No if’s, and’s or but’s.

There is NO broad scope of labeling because if GMO’s are labeled, the only ones affected will be those trying to grow Organic. Labeling GMO’s are a false ideal, it still grants foods structuring to a government entity. They still have control over who eats and who doesn’t. Labeling GMO’s does not in any way return power to the grower or buyer. What is does do is keep the stolen power in the hands of genocidal fanatics.

Therefore I’ll respond to your comment by asking you to provide the same information I requested from Nancy Seymour, the lady above who couldn’t/wouldn’t supply the information I requested. In order for your statement and argument to be taken seriously you need to state specific instances, phrases and or data in the several links I’ve provided refuting why people do not need to Protect OrganicStandards. Evidently you’re quoting from statistics so please make available your own valid research documents, comprehensive evidence and analysis in support of your proclamation.

Please invest a fair amount of time studying the links within my original post(s) proving why labeling is fraudulent; AND don’t bother attempting to dazzle us by replying with an off the cuff comment and no evidence to back it up.

FACEBOOK 1-1-2016
Nancy Seymour the information is more than a bit misleading. There is no reason why we can’t do both. Having researched GMOs, Monsanto, for more than 20 years, I find both the information and the stridency with which it’s presented less than honest.
KRISTEEN Nancy, please explain exactly what is misleading and less than honest. In order for you to be taken seriously you need to state specific instances, phrases and or data in the several links I’ve provided refuting why people do not need to Protect Organic Standards. Nancy since you’ve “researched GMOs, Monsanto, for more than 20 years” you evidently have mounds of statistics so please make available your own valid research documents, comprehensive evidence and analysis in support of your argument.

The US Department of Agriculture is nixing its grass-fed standard, but they’re doing it for the most absurd reason imaginable. Action Alert!

Last week, the USDA announced it would be withdrawing its standard for the grass-fed meat label. The agency is giving producers who used the grass-fed label thirty days to (1) convert the current “grass-fed” standard, in which 99% of the animal’s feed must be from grass or forage, into their own private standard; (2) use some other “recognized grass-fed standard,” or else (3) develop a new, voluntary, grass-fed standard—whatever the company decides is fine with the USDA.

All of this is being implemented through the USDA’s Process Verified Program (PVP). As others havepointed out, PVP is not an inspection program intended to hold producers accountable to their claims, but rather a marketing program that allows producers to make their own claims about their products and slap a USDA logo on the label.

This is the same program that allows Perdue Foods, for example, to market their chicken as being “Humanely Raised,” “Raised Cage Free,” on an “All-Vegetarian Diet,” or with “No Animal By-Products.” The “Humanely Raised” label was such a sham that it drove a Perdue chicken farmer to start a campaign to stop the USDA from putting their stamp of approval on the company’s meat because consumers were, in the farmer’s words, being “hoodwinked.”
So if producers can create their own standard and call their product “grass-fed,” and if there are no labeling regulations, it could contain 80%, or even 50%, and the rest grain-fed. There is just no way to know.

How will all this play out? It would not surprise us if the USDA either made it too difficult for small producers to get approval of any label, or censored what they can say on the label. Remember that it wasn’t long ago that the USDA refused to allow meat producers to state that they had tested their cows for mad cow disease, even when they had. The USDA didn’t allow this because large meat producers did not want to test their cattle, and did not want to have to compete against those who did. Why have to compete when you can get the government to forbid competition? In the long run, competition is often an excellent regulator, but bought regulators all too often forbid it.

We have already seen the dilution of Organicstandards through industry influence. What if cows that are 50% grass-fed can use some kind of “grass-fed” label? We can only expect larger companies to abuse this system to the detriment of consumers and small farmers.
Why is this happening? The official reasoning offered by the USDA is rather bizarre: the agency claims that, since a different USDA department, the Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS), must approve meat labels, there is no guarantee that a USDA-approved marketing claim such as “grass-fed” will be approved by FSIS.

In plain English: because two departments under the same agency cannot coordinate, the grass-fed standard is being eliminated!

This is also one step away from eliminating a grass-fed claim altogether, which would be great for Big Ag—when consumers have less information to differentiate good from bad products, all the better for the companies producing low quality products.

Action Alert! While the withdrawal of the grass-fed standard is a done deal—it is not going through any formal rulemaking process in which the public can comment and register their concerns—please contact the USDA immediately and raise your voice in protest. Send your message immediately.

Rudy ~ Remember how the Democratic party was about lynching and enslaving blacks? The Grange used to be just like this.. So why does Moms Across America and March Against Monsanto have all donations go directly to them (the Grange) while they claim to have a 501c? Doesn’t Moms and March know the Grange at the top supports GMOs? So let me explain…. The label groups say they are a 501c, but they aren’t (which is illegal to claim) and has all donations sent to their enemy, the conventional food producers and suppliers… How doesn’t this register with the activists Inside their movement? Why does the label campaign consistently state “They are not about a complete Banning of GMOs, they just want them labeled”? Why dont they want a total and complete ban? They claim, “it will bring about a total collapse of world finance”……. So in other words, they do believe in coexistence and support the right to have GMOs as long as they’re labeled…..

Hmmmmmmmm…. Doesn’t this sound like they are protecting these companies who have poisoned the earth and the children with a useless campaign? Now if anyone brings up these points, with script in hand, they say, “why are you against us? Why are you trying to fracture the movement? Why are you trying to stop us….. All we are doing is trying to protect our children from these evil companies…. Why are you fighting us“? Let me ask you guys, does this really sound like they are trying to protect children in any fashion or form? Doesn’t this sound more like they are trying to combine Organicand conventional under one single label? Doesn’t this sound like they are trying to confuse everyone…… I mean if all Organicand conventional have the label GMO free logo, how does one tell if it’s Organicor not??????? Doesn’t this sound exactly like Monsanto trickery????????

Kris FRACKING RESPONSE to: What do you think: Should we use CA’s limited water resources for drilling or drinking?
Of course I’d rather suffer the excruciating agony of my body shrinking from terminal dehydration. Have my heart and respiration rates increase to compensate for decreased plasma volume and blood pressure, while my body temperature rises due to diminished sweating ultimately resulting in delirium, extreme lethargy, seizures, headache and confusion. Have my vision become cloudy and blurred, my skin dry up and flake away while I increasingly become tired and irritable, constipated and die a horrific death from thirst than to cut big business out of their engorged financial gain.

Rudy 2-31-2015
Labeling is a multi-billion dollar business created to get both conventional and Organic money. Never before have we seen opposing sides pay for the same label. Labeling allows for coexistence and is completely fraudulent!

You cannot have anything Genetically Modified in Organicproducts. People are either forgetting this or never learned it. The USDA DOES ALLOW THE USE Of GMOS IN ORGANIC.

Why? Because Organicisn’t protected under the *LABEL GMO CAMPAIGN*; you can still spray NON GMO’s with toxic bio weapon pesticides.

Organicmeans the plants genes are unchanged “AND” they have NO chemical growth or death stimulants. Seeds, seedlings and planting stock used for crops must be organically grown *EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY THE LAW*. Organiclabeling and regulations are controlled by *THE LAW*. And who is *THE LAW*? The chemical makers, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the National Organics Program (NOP).

Rudy
February 12, 2015
Foodbabe is speaking about Zen Honeycutt…..and she wasn’t being attacked, a group told the truth to what she is up to…Guess what? Zen Honeycutt, ( Zen La Bossiere) the woman who created Moms Across America, the same women who’s husband works for Bio-rad, a company who creates the gene mashing Gene Gun for creating GMOs, is now asking people to fund her entire trip to fight the chemical companies….but 1st, she’s asking for money so she can buy stock in these companies. $200.00 for hotel, $200.00 for babysitting money, $500.00 per plane flight…..and get this…..she’s also asking $500.00 for being a “VOLUNTEER” speaker fee per function!!!!!!

How does anyone with a conscience demand to be paid to speak out for this planet! But get this, she’s also using money to fund her new book “Unstoppable Love”. …inside this book is her fraudulent take on the Monsanto shareholders meeting!

Oh yes, she obviously won’t mention how she didn’t want anyone to hear the meeting because it proves she clearly didn’t do anything and was mocked by other speakers! What a con…..can you believe people are actually falling for this? Just when you think the label GMO campaign can’t get anymore more criminal!!!

Wow……. Do you really mean to say you trust someone to speak on YOUR behalf when clearly her own agenda is for book sales?????

Furthermore, buying stocks will NOT even guarantee she gets in meetings (notice in her disclosure, if she can’t get in, she therefore gets to KEEP all the money). This is senseless!!!! Not only is Zen Honeycutt promoting violence against this planet with the purchase of these stocks, she is also promoting stock exchange with her senseless actions while making you front the bill!!!!

REMEMBER, THIS IS THEIR MEETINGS UNDER THEIR RULES WITH THEIR AGENDAS.

In case you don’t know why the GMO Labeling Campaign is a fraud movement, then think on this….

GMO Labeling allows for:
*GMO coexistence
*Pesticides
*Fungicides
*People believe eating GMO free is the same as eating organic
*Corporate ruled Government
terms are redefined and changed by chemical makers who seat The National OrganicStandards Board.

Why are we spending millions of dollars on the labeling of poison products for consumption when we should be demanding the removal of harmful toxins and chemicals????!!!!!!!!!!!!

I am for the protection of my planet, not for my entitlements! I’m against labeling because it does absolutely nothing to protect ourselves, our planet or our children from these genocide makers!

Fran
February 12, 2015
Wow I cant believe you delete anyone who disagrees with you… Us parents do not want our children poisoned. Just how long do you plan to milk this out??? Go after a company for just one toxic ingredient??? We want all poisons banned years ago!!! Zen is asking for donations to buy stock in chemical companies??? And to help publish her book???Someone I know asked you for help with a product and you told her to get a lawyer??? Exactly which side are you on??? We dont want poisons labelled …we want clean food… Our children deserve it!!! Our trees and bees are dying… There is glyphosate in our honey … Wake up and stop attacking people who want REAL change!!! You are just out to make a profit!! Give us real change to the food system pronto!!! Stop holding the movement back and deceiving people. Truth will win out.

Lydia (me)
February 13, 2015
Hi Food Babe, I’ve been checking out your blog for a couple of weeks now and up until today I felt labeling GMO products was right on target, but after reading the comments from Rudy and Fran; wow, talk about having an epiphany!

Why are we demanding labeling for toxic foods when we should be banning them?

Lydia (me)
Just in case you inadvertently overlooked my post in your haste to delete the compellingly thought provoking comments of both Rudy and Fran, I’ll repost it.

“Hi Food Babe, I’ve been checking out your blog for a couple of weeks now and up until today I felt labeling GMO products was right on target, but after reading the comments from Rudy and Fran; wow, talk about having an epiphany!”

“Why are we demanding labeling for toxic foods when we should be banning them?”

Thank you in advance for your prompt reply!

Lydia (me)
Cathy,
Since Food Babe refuses to answer my question maybe you’d be so kind as to answer it.

“Why are we demanding labeling for toxic foods (GMO’s) when we should be banning them altogether?”

Based on the information Rudy and Fran supplied – text will follow in separate comment *IF* Food Babe allows it to be posted and not deleted as she’s previously done.

Lydia (me)
Feb. 15, 2015
Food Babe, I’m seriously concerned about your integrity based on your repeated deletions of Rudy’s posts which illustrate and educate people. By expunging comments which disagree with your agenda, it appears you are defending toxic foods just so long as they’re labeled. Why are you forbidding viewers from making conscious decisions? By not allowing the assembly their right to clarity by reading every bit of information and fact available, you’re presuming your audience is ignorant! It’s like you’re pointing your finger directly in their face and saying “you’re stupid”. So just who are you afraid of?

I’ve politely and legitimately requested your take on why you want to label toxic genocide foods instead of protecting Organicstandards and how you feel about the chemical makers ruling over what constitutes the terms of organic.

So again I’ll reiterate my last post:

I’m seriously concerned about your integrity based on your repeated deletions of Rudy’s posts (and now my last 3 comments) which illustrate and educate people. By expunging comments which disagree with your agenda, it appears you are defending toxic foods just so long as they’re labeled. Why are you forbidding viewers from making conscious decisions? By not allowing the assembly their right to clarity by reading every bit of information and fact available, you’re presuming your audience is ignorant! It’s like you’re pointing your finger directly in their face and saying “You’re too stupid to think for yourself, I’ll do the thinking for you”. Food Babe, who are you afraid of?

Zen Honeycutt Rudy, Bio Rad makes a “gene gun” which is used for Alzheimer’s and Leukemia research amounsgt other diseases. I have had loved ones die from both. A pen can be used for good or evil, just like a Facebook page. Companies are responsible for what they do with the medical devices. My husband is an IT guy, has nothing to do with sales and has never come in contact with Monsanto. I have had way more contact with Monsant, having had spoken directy to Hugh Grant. My husband fixed a font on my website two years ago, and has nothing to do with running my org. Bio Rad has 10,000 labs as clients, they sell urine, blood controls, software and medical devices…they have no major realationship with Monsanto. You are barking up the wrong tree and wasting people’s time. How many letters could hane been written to the law makers to BAN GMOs in the amount of time you spent trying desperatley to dig something up to descredit a mom who is fighting for the future of our children? Stop complaining about what everyone else is doing and DO SOMETHING. Go to your legislators and regulators, who are the ONLY people who BAN things. BE PRO actove not reactive. Be a LEADER not a HATER.

Kristeen T Hernandez to Zen Honeycutt
Based on my calculations Rudy has asked you a minimum of 11 times to answer a few basic questions. However your only response has been to deflect and defend yourself, not your cause, just yourself. You should be absolutely ashamed for letting your integrity erode to the point of presupposition.

Now let’s start again, and just to be clear, there is one question here, and one question only, please answer honestly.

Why do you want to label toxic genocide foods instead of protecting Organicstandards?

Kristeen T Hernandez Thank you Penny Hartsell. I am so incredibly proud of Rudy for everything he’s doing to educate people on the protection of Organicstandards while exposing frauds who are making a career out of ripping people off with their self-absorbed sense of superiority.

Additionally I find it equally ludicrous those same people continue defrauding society even after their exposure as if nothing ever happened. You know it takes a special kind of asshole with balls of industrial steel to keep a straight face after they’ve been humiliated and embarrassed publicly; or maybe they’re just sociopathic individuals with a total lack of self-awareness.

Zen Honeycutt to Rudy (2-20-15)
RudyYou posted a private conversation after I told you you did not have permission to. Although I have nothing to hide you violated my request. This is unacceptable to me because you can choose to only post what you want others to see and give others a biased opinion. You have been repeatedly messaging me asking me to post how contaminated Organicfood is. What links do you wnat me to post? What tests have been done? I posted the wheat one when it came out. Done. I posted the honey one.Done. What else do you suggest? And why are you so intent on telling everyone how bad Organicis without offering a call to action on what we can DO about it? Right now Organicis our best option and in most cases, really help heal people. I have hundreds of testimonials showing this. I am not going to tell peopel to not eat organic. That is working for the opposition. Have you noticed that MAA’s motto is “Empowered Moms, Healthy Kids?” That means when we post bad news, usually we have a suggestion for what you can do about it, so it is empowering. We do our best. You understadn to be a successful org we do not just react to everything? We are PRO active. That means we have time consuming campaigns that we are working on that shift the conversation in our favor, not just reacting to what the opposition does. We will, as we did last year, post and request peopel to attend the NOSB in April
Spring 2015 National OrganicStandards Board (NOSB) Meeting:
Monday, April 27 – Thursday, April 30
San Diego Marriott- La JollaLa Jolla, CA

NOC Pre-NOSB Meeting:
Sunday, April 26San Diego Marriott- La JollaLa Jolla, CA Again if you don’t like whatwe do, stop wasting everyone’s time and instead of critcizing us, do it yourself. I will say one more time and then I am banning you to reduce the stress in my life. I have wasted at least an hour or two of my time with your harrassment. You trying to discredit me and find something sordid in my relationship with my husband and his job is damaging to the cause and movement and not constructive. My husband does nothing but support me. Without him we wuld not have reached millions of people and the opposition knows this and is trying to go after him now. So if my husband looses his job are you prepared to step in and run MAA, run a web site and international events, to respond to 5 forms of email and communication a day, to spend 6-10 hours a day raising money t print hundreds of thousands of flyers, connecting with other orgs for partnership and writing letters to the EPA and Wall Street firms? Has his company in the past sold medical devices to Monsanto? Unforunataly yes. AND Many companies sell things to Monsanto…goodpeople who work at electric companies, paper companies, test tube companies and uniform companies that sell lab coats…they all sell to Monsanto. Does that make them, if they are suppportive of our cause a conflict of interest? No. It makes it awesome, that if they are making any money from Monsanto that that money is then inturn going to FIGHT them. Don’t you see that? There are people who actually work at GMO labs and support our cause. Arre you wearing cotton right now? In fact YOU are supporting Monsanto.GIVING THEM money that they are using to make more GMOs. 90% of cotton is Monsanto GMO cotton. Think abot it Rudy, you are trying to dig up something to discredit me and you are working FOR the oposition by doing so. My husband has no interaction with Monsanto and the device that is used to make GMOs is also used to do research for Alzheimer’s Leukemia and more. It is like a scapel can be used to do surgery or to kill. What are you doing with your words? Are you using them to be constructive or to hurt? You are wasting people’s time by criticizing me. Just look at what I have done with the help of hundreds of selfless moms. Go to the MAA website. Read the blog to people who have given up on labling. You think you are going to get politicians to approve a ban of GMOs before they will even label? GO FOR IT! I chose to take steps that I know we can accomplish now if we work together. You know what we need to be doing? I need to be on the phone and emailing to raise money to get spanish flyers print and shipped out. That costs thousands. I need volunteers to help research the Organicstandards, and I need to raise money to get there by caling sponsors. You want change? Raise $7000 to get 100-150K flyers printed up. Raise $5000 so we can get buses to the National OrganicStandards Board. You want truth and justice. Then YOU bring it. Stop writing about the so called faults of the leaders and be a leader yourself.

Kristeen T Hernandez to Zen Honeycutt (2-20-15)
First off I’m going to explain the classification, distribution and circulation regarding posting private FaceBook conversations and or screenshots for public viewing on social media. You see *The Freedom of Information Act* works in favor of releasing information to the public. Your personal conversations become the intellectual property of the company running the site and automatically convert to public domain; therefore you have no reasonable expectation to privacy online which makes personal conversations the best place to get uncensored data.

Zen, please understand, your lengthy correspondence with Rudy has revealed more about you than you think. Your conversations are rife with details which may seem insignificant on the surface but provide exceptionally invaluable insight into you as a person.

What you’ve divulged via private communication and what you’ve disclosed in public status updates have been vastly altered to the point of outright distortion, dishonesty and deceit. Zen Honeycutt, please recognize that lacking knowledge is nothing to be ashamed of but ignoring it as you do is unadulterated deep-seated evil. Why are you attempting to lead people down a road of distraction? The one question repeatedly asked by Rudy, myself and many others is;

*Why do you want to label toxic genocide foods instead of protecting Organicstandards?*

Below are just 10 examples of the 50 or so deflections taken directly from your comments, spelling errors and all.

1. You have been repeatedly messaging me asking me to post how contaminated Organicfood is.
2. What links do you wnat me to post? What tests have been done?
3. And why are you so intent on telling everyone how bad Organicis without offering a call to action on what we can DO about it?
4. I am not going to tell peopel to not eat organic.
5. I posted the wheat one when it came out. Done.
6. I posted the honey one
7. “My husband does nothing but support me”
8. selling books, looking pretty, earning money (I can’t help but digress for a moment and point out why you think *looking pretty * has any bearing on the subject of protecting Organicstandards)
9. On one post you wrote “My husband does nothing but support me. “Without him we wuld not have reached millions of people” in another comment on another post you wrote “My husband has nothing to do with MMA” So which is it; does your husband Todd Anthony Honeycutt support MMA or doesn’t your husband Todd Anthony Honeycutt support you? Just answer the question; YES or NO?
10. Since your husband Todd Anthony Honeycutt’s company Bio-Tech cannot control you Zen Honeycutt, why are you so concerned with your husband Todd Anthony Honeycutt losing his job?

Rudy never even remotely referred to any of the above topic’s, so not only are the comments you’ve published questionable at best, they don’t even correspond to the one real question of *Why do you want to label toxic genocide foods instead of protecting Organicstandards?*
Sincerely,
Kristeen,
The extremely proud and honored mother privileged to have been blessed with Rudy TwoMoon my eldest son, a true warrior

1. Please put your effort in demanding GMO FREE products, instead of allowing GMO products to exist with a label.
2. Now I realize people believe what they want to believe, and I want really do want to believe you’re a smart woman, however you keep proving me wrong, so maybe if I simplify Rudy’s questions for your comprehension skill set you’ll be able to absorb the queries and
3. should demand labeling for toxic foods (GMO’s) over banning them altogether?
4. Judgment calls
5. regarding the REAL objective
6. of the GMO Labeling Campaign as opposed to banning toxic foods together.
7. Exemplifying serving to
8. Why are you defending
9. You should be ashamed of yourself for letting your integrity erode to the point of presupposition. Don’t be ashamed, your fears are irrational and with continued treatment quite possibly you’ll overcome those character defects which continue to hold you back.
10. Lacking knowledge is nothing to be ashamed of but ignoring it is unadulterated deep-seated evil. It takes a long time to make even a tiny amount of progress
11. Why are your attempting to lead people down a road of distraction
12. YOU are the one who should be ashamed; your bigoted comment(s) are telling on you.

11. HONEYCUTT LIE: You have been repeatedly messaging me asking me to post how contaminated Organicfood is.
a) TRUTH: Rudy NEVER as how to post contaminated Organicfood is.

12. HONEYCUTT LIE: What links do you wnat me to post? What tests have been done?
b) TRUTH: Rudy NEVER asked Zen to post ANY links

13. HONEYCUTT LIE: And why are you so intent on telling everyone how bad Organicis without offering a call to action on what we can DO about it?
c) TRUTH: Rudy NEVER told anyone, let alone everyone Organicis bad

14. HONEYCUTT LIE: I am not going to tell peopel to not eat organic
d) TRUTH: Rudy NEVER asked Zen Honeycutt to tell people not to eat Organic

15. HONEYCUTT LIE: I posted the wheat one when it came out. Done.
e) TRUTH: Rudy NEVER

18. HONEYCUTT LIE: selling books, looking pretty, earning money (I can’t help but digress for a moment and point out why you think *looking pretty * has any bearing on the subject of protecting Organicstandards)
h) TRUTH: Rudy NEVER

19. HONEYCUTT LIE: On one post you wrote “My husband does nothing but support me. “Without him we wuld not have reached millions of people” in another comment on another post you wrote “My husband has nothing to do with MMA” So which is it; does your husband Todd Anthony Honeycutt support MMA or doesn’t your husband Todd Anthony Honeycutt support you? Just answer the question; YES or NO?
i) TRUTH: Rudy NEVER

21. HONEYCUTT LIE: You trying to discredit me and find something sordid in my relationship with my husband and his job is damaging to the cause and movement and not constructive. if my husband looses his job are you prepared to step in and run MAA, run a web site and international events, to respond to 5 forms of email and communication a day, to spend 6-10 hours a day raising money t print hundreds of thousands of flyers, connecting with other orgs for partnership and writing letters to the EPA and Wall Street firms?
k) TRUTH: Rudy NEVER

22. HONEYCUTT LIE: You understadn to be a successful org we do not just react to everything? We are PRO active. That means we have time consuming campaigns that we are working on that shift the conversation in our favor, not just reacting to what the opposition does
l) TRUTH: Rudy NEVER

23. HONEYCUTT LIE: No. It makes it awesome, that if they are making any money from Monsanto that that money is then inturn going to FIGHT them.
m) TRUTH: Rudy NEVER

24. HONEYCUTT LIE: You are working FOR the opposition
n) TRUTH: Rudy NEVER

25. HONEYCUTT LIE: What are you doing with your words? Are you using them to be constructive or to hurt? You are wasting people’s time by criticizing me.
o) TRUTH: Rudy NEVER

26. HONEYCUTT LIE: You think you are going to get politicians to approve a ban of GMOs before they will even label?
p) TRUTH: Rudy NEVER

27. HONEYCUTT LIE: I need to be on the phone and emailing to raise money to get spanish flyers print and shipped out.
q) TRUTH: Rudy NEVER

28. HONEYCUTT LIE: I need volunteers to help research the Organicstandards, and I need to raise money to get there by caling sponsors. You want change? Raise $7000 to get 100-150K flyers printed up. Raise $5000 so we can get buses to the National OrganicStandards Board. You want truth and justice. Then YOU bring it. Stop writing about the so called faults of the leaders and be a leader yourself.
r) TRUTH: Rudy NEVER