Pregnancy is usually a time of joy, but for Kim Kardashian it's almost like a wearing a big red target that says 'please talk mess about me.'

While we all know how much the Keeping Up With The Kardashians star likes to wear fur, it's only obvious that PETA would be far from pleased with her choice of clothing. So instead of just slamming her for donning dead animals, they're now questioning her mothering skills.

The organization's spokesperson, Wendy Wenger stated that her love for fur can be passed down to her unborn child, which is not something that they want to happen.

Wenger added:

“Children of greedy, self-absorbed parents could follow their lead or they could break away and be alienated from and disgusted by them. Kim is a commodity, she is paid to wear things like fur, a particular makeup, or to shake hands with questionable people, so she is not a good example to a child or anyone else of how to show a social conscience.

Thankfully, this child will be growing up in a time when most people know how blatantly cruel it is to buy a coat made from someone else’s skin, so there is hope.

Youngsters naturally identify and empathize with animals – so even though Kim and Kanye will undoubtedly serve as poor examples when it comes to kindness toward animals, perhaps their child will take after aunt Khloe and choose kindness by rejecting fur.”

Khloe has posed for PETA's 'I'd Rather Go Naked' anti-fur campaign in the past, so we're not surprised that they would call her out and hope that the Kimye baybay follows in her footsteps.

As for Kim and Yeezy, we highly doubt that they will stop wearing fur anytime soon, but we don't think that attacking their parenting skills is right — especially because their baby isn't even here yet!!

PETA is headed by a bunch of nuts. That's just crass to try and link wearing fur to bad parenting (especially with Kim, there are so many other ways to link her to it!). PETA feels perfectly ok about using sex, dieting, and shock tactics, but owning anything leather and being a vegan do not an animal rights activist/supporter make.

So, perez where is all the outrage for kim wearing FUR, that you give others? You have turned into such a hypocrite, come down on others for wearing fur but all the praise for kim. Oh I forgot you are getting paid from the kartrashians, my bad.

Anyone affiliated with or supports PETA should be branded a terrorist. They are the most useless bunch of assholes on the face of the earth. I mean seriously these people protect rats! I would skin a rabbit right in from of those psychos

okay i don't even like kim k but this is insane…the clothing she wears (albeit completely unattractive at times) or what the clothing is made out of has nothing to do with what type of parent she will be…peta is really stretching it this time…

Re: Ky – Thanks, I had read that elsewhere, too sad if true and I have no reason to doubt you.
PETA should mind their own business, although I do not care for Kim, her wearing fur has nothing to do with how good a mother she would be.
Heck back in the 70's and 80's many people wore fur, my former MIL gave me a gorgeous blond mink stole, which I could only wear about once a year, as it does not normally get that cold in Southern California where I live.

Re: cheesuschrimbus – I'm sympathetic to their wish to reduce fur wearers, but slandering a pregnant woman's future mothering skills to ply your agenda
is why I stopped donating to PETA and give to a local no kill animal shelter instead. PETA'S tactics are offensive to me; and obviously to many others. I respond to empathy videos like that little blind dog that was found on an empty lot, rescued, cleaned up and given donated eye surgery to get its vision back who now has a happy home and family.

Well it isn't like Kim or Kanye will do much as parents. She will hire house keepers and nannies to do it all while she keeps up appearances all the while ignoring her kid. She does not even look happy to be pregnant..,its pretty disturbing honestly. I pity this child.

Seriously this woman gets uglier and uglier as time goes on. It must be her black hearted soul that's slowly seeping through. She's wearing the long coat to hide her humongous hips!!! Seriously is she carrying the child in her ass??!! Please go away Whoretrashians. ALL of you!! Including the next generation of whorelettes!!

these peta people are demented there is a difference between standing for a cause and running around throwing flour on people then attacking their mothering skills…when the kids not even born yet…if u wear leather ur wearing cows …Re: MR Pete – lolololol i had to laugh at that .. haha

She really is a deplorable individual. She cares for nothing or no one, except herself. Wearing fur is just another prime example of how selfish and uncaring she is. Does anyone really expect her to be a good mother? Take a look at her history. Best thing for the baby, is to be put up for adoption! I wish she and her family would just fade away…

It's a stretch to call her a bad mother because she wears fur.
She will be a bad mother for lots or other reasons, I believe, though, like being an
attention loving whore who won't go away and still demands her privacy! Maybe if Kanye spanked that big a**–oh, wait, he probably does.–Yeah, that's it, it's not baby weight gain, it's a sex game and the swelling is from trying to duplicate 50 Shades of Grey!

First of all, i agree with the PETA… if kim being floured down on a red carpet, and being sent tragic videos of poor animals being killed for their fur doesnt do it, what kind of heart does this bitch have? she doesnt have one is the answer. Secondly, maybe momager kris jenner can finally get off her lazy smelly ass and get a job herself instead of mooching off her slut daughters. I cant wait for the trial of kim's 72 day marriage to start in May so maybe just one of the many sluts in the whoredashians clan, can finally get what was coming for her.

people need to think of it this way, when this whore gives birth to a child - if its a daughter , no matter how badly we all want that child not to be like kim k — she most likely will be like her mother. so thats 2 other ppl in the world who have shitloads of money to buy more then just one furcoat that are promoting animal cruelty.

can you guys imagine if her baby daughter gets the face of the father and the ass of the mother? if she doesnt turn out to be as pretty as Kim might expect her to be i hope that she is not cruel to the little girl, feeling ashamed for having an ugly daughter that she cant put in the covers of magazines.

Commenting on her every breath, just adds to her fortune. If you're of questionable morals and intelligence, you'll keep watching that family. I've been told that even the younger girls may be have caught the " K" disease. I was hoping they would be all Jenner.