I think you're stuck on counting grams, but for many of us, the real difference is simply the size of these cameras. For example, the Canon SL1, touted as being the world's smallest APS-C DSLR, is still larger than a FF mirrorless Sony A7. I'll say it again, the world's smallest APS-C DSLR is still larger than a FF mirrorless camera...even with lenses mounted.

Think again:

Not equivalent apertures but comparing non-equivalent apertures became a fun game here.

He said Full frame mirrorless vs. APS DSLR.

He also said f/2.8 zooms, etc., and T3 linked to nothing like that.

The FF mirrorless is smaller in size while the APS DLSR has much smaller equivalent apertures. Sadly, you confused FF mirrorless with APS and messed up your comparison.

It was T3 who did that, not me.

btw, how ever many lenses you can mount on a Canon, multiply by 10 and you still won't get how many lenses you can mount on the mirrorless camera including all those Canon FD lenses that will not fit on on the SL1.

MF and adapters - adding size and weight on the top of that? No, thanks, and I did mention that.