B.C. set to overhaul Agricultural Land Reserve

NDP agriculture critic Nicholas Simons said leaked e-mails demonstrate the ministers behind Bill 24 had an agenda before the last election to weaken the independent agency in charge of protected farmland.

The B.C. government is set to pass legislation on Thursday that overhauls the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) – a change the opposition New Democrats branded as a covert campaign to free up protected farmland for development.

NDP agriculture critic Nicholas Simons said leaked e-mails demonstrate the ministers behind Bill 24 – Bill Bennett and Pat Pimm – had an agenda before the last election to weaken the independent agency in charge of protected farmland.

"These e-mails make it clear they disliked the Agricultural Land Reserve and wanted to undermine the land commission. Clearly, the views that were expressed in these e-mails should probably have disqualified them from being eligible to sit in cabinet," Mr. Simons said in the legislature on Wednesday.

Story continues below advertisement

"Instead, they were rewarded by the Premier with the two positions most capable of destroying our farmland. … They had the motive. She gave them the opportunity and the means."

The release of the e-mails prompted an apology on Wednesday from Mr. Pimm, who was minister of agriculture when the proposed legislation was introduced.

Mr. Pimm, who is on medical leave, wrote in an e-mail in July, 2012, that the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC) was getting in the way of changes that would help him at election time while his government was busy finding ways to "give the Indians more money which doesn't get me one vote!"

After the contents of the e-mail were reported this week, Mr. Pimm issued a written statement: "I deeply regret and apologize for my comments in regards to First Nations that appeared in The Globe and Mail today. They were inappropriate and wrong."

Mr. Bennett, the author of Bill 24, distanced himself from Mr. Pimm's comments, but defended his own efforts to lobby for change. In the summer of 2012, Mr. Bennett complained in an e-mail to then-agriculture minister Don McRae that the ALC was dragging its heels on his push to rezone land within the ALR. "There has to be room for other job-creating, tax-paying activities," he said at the time.

Mr. Bennett told reporters in Victoria on Wednesday he has never hidden his desire for changes at the ALC. He added that he is not sure how Richard Bollock, chair of the ALC, ended up on the e-mail thread. The result was that the independent agency was well aware of the complaints.

Mr. Bennett said he was acting on the wishes of his constituents.

Story continues below advertisement

Story continues below advertisement

"I didn't get elected four times because I don't listen to my constituents," he said. He added that he has heard many complaints about the ALC in his riding. "You can call that politics; I call that democracy."

However, he said he disapproved of Mr. Pimm's remarks about First Nations. He was copied on the e-mail at the time: "I'd forgotten that he said that. I am very distressed to see it in print. … He should apologize for that."

Stewart Phillip, the grand chief of the Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs, condemned the remarks. "The comments from MLA Pat Pimm, especially as an appointed member of the [legislature committee] on Aboriginal Affairs, are completely repugnant, reprehensible and downright racist."

The MLAs are expected to end the spring legislative session on Thursday, and Bill 24 is the final law to be passed. It will divide the ALR into two zones, and the commission will be required to provide more flexibility in land use in Zone 2 to allow activities such as food processing and potential oil and gas development.

Agriculture Minister Norm Letnik said he is comfortable that the new law will preserve farmland and ensure "we have a strong ALC that is independent of politicians."

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.

Treat others as you wish to be treated

Criticize ideas, not people

Stay on topic

Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language

Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.