13 March 2012

Sivarasa puzzled by Hisham's response...

PKR Subang MP R Sivarasa described Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussain's response to the Malaysiakinireport of alleged crimes committed by attorney-general Abdul Gani
Patail as a "classic case of an ostrich burying its head in the sand."
Last Sunday, Malaysiakini had detailed in an extensive report
the alleged actions of Abdul Gani in a case involving the detention and
later release of a suspected illegal gambling kingpin in Johor whose
syndicate was said to have flourished with the alleged collusion of the
former inspector-general of police Musa Hassan, who was then Johor chief
police officer.

The web news portal claimed it had in its possession documents
purporting to show that the AG's alleged deportment in the case was
liable to charges of corruption, abuse of power and fabrication of
evidence.

In a terse response to the Malaysiakini report, Home Minister Hishammuddin (right) was reported yesterday to have said: "Prove it, prove it."

Sivarasa, who will file an urgent motion in Parliament tomorrow to discuss the contents of the Malaysiakini

"It's typical of the minister's in-denial behaviour and most unbecoming
of one purportedly educated in the law," said Sivarasa, who read law at
Oxford on a Rhodes scholarship.

"A responsible response would have been to suggest that perhaps besides
making allegations in a web news report, that a police report should be
lodged," chided Sivarasa.

"Better still, that he had directed the police to lodge a report so that
investigations could be launched as to whether the allegations were
true.

"After all, the allegations on first blush were credible because Malaysiakini
were saying they had the documentary evidence in the form of statutory
declarations. Very rarely does it get as good as that," argued Sivarasa.Re-open investigation into the case

The PKR legal eagle made the case for a re-opening of the investigation
of five years ago into the controversy that was ignited by the detention
of a ‘Tengku Goh' for allegedly running an illegal gambling syndicate
in Johore.

Sivarasa explained: "The expose by Malaysiakini shows that
there are two conflicting versions - the version uncovered by Commercial
Crimes Investigation Department led by Ramli Yusuff showing that Musa
Hassan (right) while Johor CPO was in cahoots with Tengku Goh running gambling and money-lending syndicates.

"The other version supposedly uncovered by the then ACA said that the
allegations against Tengku Goh were fabricated. This version led to six
police officers supposedly making these false allegations being charged,
but the court hearing the charges found them so flimsy it did not even
call for their defence.

"And sitting in the middle of all this is the albatross of the AG
Patail, who supposedly pulled the file from the CCID and passed it to
the ACA.

"Surely, the minister must see the obvious point staring at us all -
that an independent inquiry was urgently needed to unearth the truth.

"Surely he must see that the last thing a responsible minister must do
is to ask journalists to provide him ‘proof' before he takes action."Sivarasa (left) said that journalists do not run investigation departments or courts - they unearth issues for ministers like him to act on.

"An inquiring public will next ask: Is Hishammuddin deliberately missing
the point? What is his interest in covering up the matter?"

By filing an urgent motion
in Parliament tomorrow on the matter, Sivarasa would be able to test
whether the House's acoustics are receptive to the public's concerns.- malaysiakini

disclaimer

1. This is a personal weblog. The opinions expressed here represent my own and is not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, institution, political organization, or individual.

2. Any view or opinion represented in the blog comments are personal and is accredited to the respective commentor / visitor to this blog.

3. This blogger reserves the right to moderate comment suitability in support of respecting racial, religious and political sensitivities, and in order to protect the rights of each commentor where available.