In the old system, there were separate identity for people like Martin William or Observer. But in this new one that is not anymore. Would it be possible to re state that he is the editor of cricinfo or he was the coach of B U 19..

__________________
Twenty20 is not a gentleman's game. It's like a one-night stand and not a marriage. It is a street format and the goonda doesn't know what is a late cut or a cover drive

__________________They said, "After we turn into bones and fragments, we get resurrected anew?!" Say, "Even if you turn into rocks or iron.[17:49-50] |Wiki: Cold Fusion occurring via quatum tunnelling in ~101500 years makes everything into iron.

Could you guys add BD vs India match that Bangladesh has won. please, upload the higlights or whatever you have about that win of bangladesh in multimedia section. otherwise, everything is very organized. If the 3rd odi of that series against india that bangladesh has lost is posted, should not the 2nd ODI be posted? thanks in advance

Is it possible for me to make a "tips box"? Basically it will work this way:

Upon reading one of my posts, if a user really likes it and feels I ought be rewarded for it, he comes to the tip box, finds al the info by which he can tip me money. S/he will also mention how much money s/he is tipping so Banglacricket can get its .05% cut for promoting my idea.

What if we don't like your post and feel like you need to penalized for wasting our time? Are you going to give a lumpsum amout of money to us and Banglacricket getting its .05% share? I am all for it then.

__________________
The Weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is an attribute of the Strong." - Gandhi.

The so called class system is a waste IMNSHO (In my not so humble opinion). The sheer number of posts does not a good poster make. In fact, some of these numbers stem purely from useless "me too" and "I agree" posts. I would leave it to the members to judge from the content of the posts and not from number as to whether to give credence to the opinions of the poster.

On the other hand, a large number of posts do mean one thing. They have managed to babble for a long time without getting banned. Can't be too bad then, eh?

IDK about this but I've seen it in other forums how about a Sub-forum for polls? In smaller font under the BD Cricket/Int Cricket/Forget Cricket forums?

__________________12.6 Syed Rasel to Sangakkara, OUT: What a delivery, completely fooled Sangakkara, first five delivery were the outswingers and now, this one comes in sharply, Sangakkara tries to left it and ball hits the off stump, top class bowling!

Is there a way to bring back the multiquote? Or was that an XMB thing?

__________________12.6 Syed Rasel to Sangakkara, OUT: What a delivery, completely fooled Sangakkara, first five delivery were the outswingers and now, this one comes in sharply, Sangakkara tries to left it and ball hits the off stump, top class bowling!

yea that kind of posting is ridiculous...i do believe it can be banned by extrapolating the board rules which state not to use all caps or all bold for the sake of readers' eyes...therefor dumbspeak should also be out...

Hi: I send this suggestions to one of the admin.s and he asked me to put it here..so here we go...

Quote:

Hi: I've been a regular on this forum for about 2 years, and wanted to give some feedback just as a regular member. I think this forum is great and the MODs are doing a wonderful job. But with the team's recent success the band-wagon fans are starting to ruin the fun a bit. There are often 5 or 6 threads about similar topics and this causes three problems.

Quote:

#1 You don't know where to put your post#2 You have to jump from thread to thread to read the complete story#3 Because of the divided the attention, in most threads, the discussion dies down after a one or two pages.So here are my suggestions: #1 Delete/Move all existant threads#2 MODs start one thread for each player and coaching stuff on the squad (all the discussion about Ashraful stays in his thread)#3 MODs also start threads for each notable/significant topic (Such as captaincy, team selection, batting order, future players etc.)#4 If a member feels that there's a topic that existing threads don't cover, they can send the suggestion to MODS and they can review the necessity or direct the member to the appropiate thread.Again, I know, this might be a hard task and post counts maybe messed up due to all the re-arrangement. It's just my suggestion that thought might make this forum more interesting and make the discussion here enjoyable and lively. Thanx. *BTW thanks for that chat session with Razzaq and Mushfiq, hope there will be more of that in the future.

__________________
Fast bowling is all about character and attitude. You have to have the attitude of bowling fast and hitting people. So for most of the Sub-continent the problem remains in the attitude." (Aqib Javed)

Habfreak: lots of good comments. The underlying idea is, mods deal with all new thread openings in this case. In perfect world, I will go for that. But in current context, I think that will be difficult to maintain. It not only depends on the intention of mods to help, but also on members who really care to follow this.

I do feel the pain. And that's why, I think we should always make use of the "Report post" button for the opening post of the threads to give an indication to the mods/admins which thread that particular thread can be merged with.

I understand that a little bit of strictness is necessary to end thus overwhelming number of threads. But we also don't want to make it too strict, do we?

Also, there seems to be a "sudden thread outburst" for some members, who all of a sudden would open 5 different threads unnecessarily. I think there should be a quota of the number of threads that one can open in a day. Better still if that can be based on the status of the member. For senior members (not only based on post count, but also on the length of their stay), there should be a higher limit than newer members who may not have understood the whole idea of thread opening trend.

Now I know the thread starter has acknowledged lots of times and has apologised, but I still have found it a total turn off to add whatever comments of substance I had hovering in my mind to the thread topic, also partly because the thread trailed off into his lingo, rather than the content of his post.

2. This title post ( http://www.banglacricket.com/alochon...ad.php?t=21032 ) had a link to India's BD tour prep coverage, which I found to be very good. I really had a good mind to write my comments on the developments and hard work the Indian team is putting on, and that we really ought to be concerned, etc... ie a post of substance. However the thread is completely about arguing on whether the Indian team is called "tigers" or not. Again, completely put me off from writing anything remotely constructive. The sub-forum really is for cricket talk after all.

I'm sorry and I admit that this is my problem, whether I reply or not to these threads, and perhaps there are alternate threads already discussing what I had in mind, but really I thought I'd at least let the mods know my frustration.