CALENDAR

I received several e-mails from fans informing me that they had seen me Thursday night on MSNBC. This was news to me.

As it turns out, resident lesbian Rachel Maddow simply played a muted video of me speaking on her national television show, where she then dubbed me as being a “skinhead.” Allow me to first set the stage.

This whole ordeal started when Jason Richwine was dismissed from the Heritage Foundation this week for being a little too honest about fundamental and obvious racial differences. Jared Taylor provides the facts:

In yet another act of cowardice, a “conservative” institution has fired someone from saying something that is not only true, but that everyone knows to be true. This time the Heritage Foundation joined the ranks of the lickspittles by forcing out a senior researcher, Jason Richwine. Mr. Richwine, who co-authored the Heritage’s recently released report on the costs of amnesty, had written his Harvard PhD thesis on the implications of racial differences in IQ for immigration policy—and racial differences in IQ have such obvious policy implications that a “think tank” dare not think about them.

There is no need to repeat the things that have been said by Mr. Richwine’s attackers. They are just as gloatingly idiotic as you would imagine. It is far more important to point out that Mr. Richwine had important defenders—but Heritage still folded. And what makes its behavior particularly revolting is that the people who run it knew about Mr. Richwine’s dissertation ever since they hired him two years ago. It is hard to imagine more craven behavior.

Michele Malkin noted that “if it is now inherently racist to study racial and ethnic differences among demographic groups, then it’s time to shut down every social sciences department in the country.”

Rush Limbaugh wrote: “We must have honest discussions about race. We must have honest discussions about immigration. Well, here is one. Here’s an honest discussion, a doctoral dissertation, and it is under attack because it is honest.” He added, “What is happening to Jason Richwine is inexcusable.”

Ann Coulter called the assault on Mr. Richwine “liberal attacks on science.”

Even David Weigel, hardly a friend of the right, was unhappy: “A liberal squeals ‘racism,’ and they hear the political correctness cops (most often, the Southern Poverty Law Center) reporting a thinkcrime.”

Enter Rachel Maddow, pictured here with her husband.

In an attempt to tie Jason Richwine to other truth tellers thought criminals, MSNBC dug up a loose collaboration between Richwine and the National Policy Institute’s Richard Spencer. It was Richard who was truly the star of the hysterical segment on Maddow’s show. Never before have I seen a picture of a man plastered on a television screen for nearly twenty minutes. Richard provides the details:

Maddow’s technique was nothing more than point and sputter. The spot only makes sense if you are morally outraged by even the inkling of European nationalism (They’re, like, White people. . . and they’re . . . [gasp] . . . standing up for their interests!!!) Otherwise, the clip is a fair depiction of NPI’s stated goals. Many will find it attractive. (The spot is marred only by a stupid insinuation that because my friend James Edwards shaves his head, he must be a “skinhead.”)

What does bother me greatly—what makes me nauseated, in fact—are two matters.

First and most important, I am being used as a means of harming the career of a good man and reputable scholar, Jason Richwine.

Richwine and I have only met briefly; we haven’t collaborated on anything beyond the one article I commissioned for AltRight three years ago. I don’t influence Jason or his work; we, no doubt, don’t agree on everything. Put simply, Jason should be judged on his words, not some tenuous connection he might have with me.

Indeed, there’s nothing quite like a lesbian television personality telling normal people what constitutes normal. I didn’t watch it all the way through, but what I watched was fairly comical. Scroll to the 4:22 mark of the video to see where yours truly get some face time. Apparently there is now no difference between being shaving one’s head and being a “skinhead.”

I suppose I could do what Rachel does, which is go to a barber and tell him to put a bowl on my head and cut it like Moe Howard, but that look only works for her.

At any rate, this Jason Richwine/Heritage Foundation ordeal is a pretty big story right now, with no shortage of national figures chiming in. Join us LIVE tonight when Richard Spencer joins us as our featured guest to connect the dots and make sense of it all!

In the meantime, click here to read more of Richard’s take on the Jason Richwine affair.

We’ll look forward to talking with you on the radio this evening!

Keep in mind…

The Political Cesspool Radio Program broadcasts live each Saturday evening (6:00 pm – 9:00 pm Central Time) from AM 1380 WLRM Radio in Memphis, Tennessee. We are syndicated nationwide to the AM / FM affiliate stations of the Liberty News Radio Network. Our program also simulcasts online and our library of broadcast archives can be accessed on demand.

Maddow has a crush on Edwards. James you awakened something deep inside Maddow. Invite her on your show i bet she will squeal with girlish delight. Where there is love there is hope. Don’t taze me bro.

Oh my gosh! That is the article by Richwine that Rush Limbaugh had posted on his Facebook page that I mentioned in the other post! I didn’t know about it until seeing it there yesterday. I still need to scroll backwards a few days on his page to see the full commentary Rush had on it. I will keep you tuned. So glad this is getting so much attention. Looking forward to the show tonight!

Wait, is she an idiot or something? She celebrates same-sex marriage at the beginning, but then in less than a minute mocks Republicans for wanting to ban Sharia Law in a state? If she thinks white Republicans hate gays, just wait until her beloved Muslims are allowed to have Sharia Law. Liberals are idiot scum hypocrites!

This makes me mad, James! If she isn’t going to take the time to describe you as you really are, then why doesn’t she at least show footage of you with your wife? Or is she too scared that that would make her look bad?

Last year, I posted a footnote to some of my featured articles, which addresses the fact that of all the subjects that are of any importance to Man, whether organic or inorganic, the variations of the subject of Mankind are the only subjects where there is a compulsion not to study the differences, variations in the category. (See .) Think about it.

If that is not convincing evidence that we are dealing not with reason, but neurotic compulsion, what would be.

True Conservatives need to make the Jason Richwine case their own. The effort to suppress this scholar illustrates the mental sickness that is destroying the West. And while it may be aimed at the Western Heritage, it is not sparing anyone else, except the demagogues and scoundrels who pander to it. No one benefits from not being better understood–no one–except demagogues & scoundrels.

I’ve watched that entire Maddow segment twice now, and one of the things that stands out to me the most is what she says right at the 10:00 mark:

“So not only are Latinos intellectually inferior to whites, but of course they breed. Ugh. it’s disgusting, right?”

Maddow is of course being sarcastic. She’s deriding Richwine for supposedly believing that it’s bad if Latinos have more babies. Clearly she thinks there’s nothing wrong with Latinos having more babies. Clearly she is comfortable with the fact that the Latino birthrate (the brown birthrate) surpasses the white birthright.

By contrast, every lamestream media report on James Edwards and TPC cite his desire to increase the white birthrate above replacement level as the most evil horrible rayciss thing ever. They support more brown babies, but they demonize those who support more white babies. They are not anti-racist, they are anti-white.

What I found the most disturbing about the Maddow hit piece was the audio clip of an NPR interview with Heritage’s VP of Communications Mike Gonzalez. The interview was a textbook example of liberal browbeating and Gonzalez , who is being paid to handle Heritage’s dealings with the media, sat there and took it. He didn’t challenge his fellow hispanic accuser nor did he defend Richwine’s right to intellectual freedom. These are the people charged with defending conservatism? How much does Gonzalez make a year occupying an air conditioned office at the Heritage Foundation? How much money does this group suck in from gullible conservatives that could be better spent on doing things that actually matter?

WOW, what an angry lesbian. What she’s really angry about is that traditional white Americans are slowly beginning to realizable they have an identity and specific interests unique to their ethnicity and culture.

What Maddow is, is threatened, threatened the truth and the facts are leaking into the mainstream and her grand egalitarian daydream will disappear in a poof of smoke?

At 16:28 the little gay latino dude she is talking with says “you are not entitled to your own facts”.
That sums up the liberal perspective. IF your White, and straight, you can’t tell the truth…at least not on msnbc – the Madcow Show.