This "virtual newspaper for an aquatic world" contains musings, science, facts and opinions-both profound and mundane-about the River region, its people and natural resources, and their nexus to the Washington, DC scene.
Comments and other written contributions are always appreciated.

Monday, July 15, 2013

House Passes Energy and Water Spending Bill Setting Up Showdown With Senate

On July 10, following two days of debate, the House passed its version of the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, H.R. 2609 on a roll call vote of 227 - 198. The bill provides funding for, among other agencies, the Army Corps of Engineers. Total funding for the Army Corps was reduced to $4.676 billion, compared to the $4.98 billion appropriated during fiscal year 2013 and the $4.726 billion requested in the President's fiscal year 2014 budget proposal. A political showdown now looms between the House and the Senate and their respective spending bills over a contentious Clean Water Act jurisdiction issue, and also over the amount of funding authorized by the respective measures.

The House voted 177-236 against a proposed Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA-8) amendment that would have removed language from the spending bill that effectively blocks the Army Corps from implementing an Administration guidance to clarify Clean Water Act jurisdiction. The House spending bill has been called the most expansive attempt to date to block the draft joint EPA-Army Corps guidance to refine the tests that determine the Clean Water Act's reach over isolated wetlands and other marginal waters. The House bill's language would block a controversial guidance that has been under review by the Office of Management and Budget since last year. as well as a pending rulemaking by the Army Corps and EPA that would clarify when waters are considered “navigable waters” and therefore subject to the law's regulatory requirements. A corresponding Senate bill (see below) contains no such restriction.

Key amendments relating to the Mississippi River Basin that were passed (each by a voice vote) during the hours of debate on the bill included:

Rep. Steve King's (R-IA-4) amendment to block the Army Corps from placing sediment into the Missouri River to create shallow water habitat for the endangered pallid sturgeon.

Rep. Noem's amendment to shift $25 million to a rural water program, while reducing spending on efficiency, renewable energy and DOE administration by $15 million each.

H.R. 2609 provides funds for the study and prevention of the further spread of aquatic invasive species by funding the Great Lakes-Mississippi River Interbasin Study (GLMRIS), which the Army Corps expects to finalize at the end of this year, and it provides authority for the Army Corps to implement recommendations from GLMRIS to prevent the further spread of those aquatic invasive species, most notably Asian carp, between the two basins.