Feel free to discuss anything about any of the thousands of Transformer toys here. Anything from Generation 1 all the way to the soon to be released, the never to be released or the hope to be released is fair game! Want to show off your stuff? Please post your's and see others in the Transformers Collections Forum.

Ah yes, the very rare actual tranformation of a Transformer in MTMTE. Still, an actual Hasbro licensed toy is probably going to turn some heads, seeing as how this is one has several 3P versions already.

Ah yes, the very rare actual tranformation of a Transformer in MTMTE. Still, an actual Hasbro licensed toy is probably going to turn some heads, seeing as how this is one has several 3P versions already.

It's not really Tarn, as it's just Shockwaves password, as it's Tarn as in the city, not the character.

And Springer looks nice, but why are we doing the same characters over and over when there are so many that haven't been revisited?

There’s been 2 Springer figures in 6 years. Hardly overdoing it.

Plus we’ve pretty much gotten everybody except autobot Targetmasters and a few headmasters. It’s not like there’s that many left to modernize. Literally 13 years of CHUG. It’s lasted longer than the original G1 run.

The well is drained clean.

But it is funny to hear people say “another of this character?” When a couple years ago people were throwing hissy fits that’ characters were being made into headmasters saying “that character isn’t a headmaster. Why are they doing this?”

Motto:"Well, when I see five weirdos dressed in togas, stabbing a man in the middle of the park in full view of a hundred people, I shoot the bastards! That's MY policy!"

Weapon: Photon Blaster

RiddlerJ wrote:

Randomhero wrote:

RodimusConvoy13 wrote:

RiddlerJ wrote:Another Astrotrain?

And Springer looks nice, but why are we doing the same characters over and over when there are so many that haven't been revisited?

There’s been 2 Springer figures in 6 years. Hardly overdoing it.

Plus we’ve pretty much gotten everybody except autobot Targetmasters and a few headmasters. It’s not like there’s that many left to modernize. Literally 13 years of CHUG. It’s lasted longer than the original G1 run.

The well is drained clean.

But it is funny to hear people say “another of this character?” When a couple years ago people were throwing hissy fits that’ characters were being made into headmasters saying “that character isn’t a headmaster. Why are they doing this?”

And Springer looks nice, but why are we doing the same characters over and over when there are so many that haven't been revisited?

There’s been 2 Springer figures in 6 years. Hardly overdoing it.

Plus we’ve pretty much gotten everybody except autobot Targetmasters and a few headmasters. It’s not like there’s that many left to modernize. Literally 13 years of CHUG. It’s lasted longer than the original G1 run.

The well is drained clean.

But it is funny to hear people say “another of this character?” When a couple years ago people were throwing hissy fits that’ characters were being made into headmasters saying “that character isn’t a headmaster. Why are they doing this?”

The point is, when it comes to new figures (either repaints or new molds) they keep going to the same well of characters. If there's another character you'd like a toy, ANY toy of, you're beat because we need Jetfire number 4 and Hot Rod number 6.

And yes, we already had one unique Springer in addition to the other Springers that everyone loved. Did we get even one unique of the guys I mentioned above? Even a repaint?

Motto:"Well, when I see five weirdos dressed in togas, stabbing a man in the middle of the park in full view of a hundred people, I shoot the bastards! That's MY policy!"

Weapon: Photon Blaster

RiddlerJ wrote:

RodimusConvoy13 wrote:

RiddlerJ wrote:

Randomhero wrote:

RodimusConvoy13 wrote:

RiddlerJ wrote:Another Astrotrain?

And Springer looks nice, but why are we doing the same characters over and over when there are so many that haven't been revisited?

There’s been 2 Springer figures in 6 years. Hardly overdoing it.

Plus we’ve pretty much gotten everybody except autobot Targetmasters and a few headmasters. It’s not like there’s that many left to modernize. Literally 13 years of CHUG. It’s lasted longer than the original G1 run.

The well is drained clean.

But it is funny to hear people say “another of this character?” When a couple years ago people were throwing hissy fits that’ characters were being made into headmasters saying “that character isn’t a headmaster. Why are they doing this?”

The point is, when it comes to new figures (either repaints or new molds) they keep going to the same well of characters. If there's another character you'd like a toy, ANY toy of, you're beat because we need Jetfire number 4 and Hot Rod number 6.

And yes, we already had one unique Springer in addition to the other Springers that everyone loved. Did we get even one unique of the guys I mentioned above? Even a repaint?

You need to realize this line isn’t Star Wars. A character who got 3 frames in Rebirth Pt 1 is not nearly as we’ll known as a main character from the ‘86 movie. Hasbro likes their deep cuts, but they also have to make money.

"One of them even took the time to smear, “Fans are TeH SUCK!!!” in poop all over my windshield!"

And Springer looks nice, but why are we doing the same characters over and over when there are so many that haven't been revisited?

There’s been 2 Springer figures in 6 years. Hardly overdoing it.

Plus we’ve pretty much gotten everybody except autobot Targetmasters and a few headmasters. It’s not like there’s that many left to modernize. Literally 13 years of CHUG. It’s lasted longer than the original G1 run.

The well is drained clean.

But it is funny to hear people say “another of this character?” When a couple years ago people were throwing hissy fits that’ characters were being made into headmasters saying “that character isn’t a headmaster. Why are they doing this?”

The point is, when it comes to new figures (either repaints or new molds) they keep going to the same well of characters. If there's another character you'd like a toy, ANY toy of, you're beat because we need Jetfire number 4 and Hot Rod number 6.

And yes, we already had one unique Springer in addition to the other Springers that everyone loved. Did we get even one unique of the guys I mentioned above? Even a repaint?

You need to realize this line isn’t Star Wars. A character who got 3 frames in Rebirth Pt 1 is not nearly as we’ll known as a main character from the ‘86 movie. Hasbro likes their deep cuts, but they also have to make money.

Yeah, I get that. I also know, that they might make a little more money, if they didn't pad a line with 75% characters people already have and may not buy a 3rd version of. People loved new arrivals like Cog and Brunt. Kids don't care either way (They're not the ones clamoring for yet another Springer and Jetfire) We already got out mainstays to every line like Optimus and Bumblebee and Megatron, they can diversify things up a little more than Prowl number 4

And Springer looks nice, but why are we doing the same characters over and over when there are so many that haven't been revisited?

There’s been 2 Springer figures in 6 years. Hardly overdoing it.

Plus we’ve pretty much gotten everybody except autobot Targetmasters and a few headmasters. It’s not like there’s that many left to modernize. Literally 13 years of CHUG. It’s lasted longer than the original G1 run.

The well is drained clean.

But it is funny to hear people say “another of this character?” When a couple years ago people were throwing hissy fits that’ characters were being made into headmasters saying “that character isn’t a headmaster. Why are they doing this?”

The point is, when it comes to new figures (either repaints or new molds) they keep going to the same well of characters. If there's another character you'd like a toy, ANY toy of, you're beat because we need Jetfire number 4 and Hot Rod number 6.

And yes, we already had one unique Springer in addition to the other Springers that everyone loved. Did we get even one unique of the guys I mentioned above? Even a repaint?

You need to realize this line isn’t Star Wars. A character who got 3 frames in Rebirth Pt 1 is not nearly as we’ll known as a main character from the ‘86 movie. Hasbro likes their deep cuts, but they also have to make money.

We did get a Cyberverse Guzzle in the DoTM line. It was an entirely new mold.

Also Hasbro just started doing Micromasters again and we have little to no idea who they'll make next, and while I doubt every character will get a new toy, most of them will.

Springer is a popular character who hasn't gotten a new toy since Generations, so of course they'd make a new one.

I agree we should get seacons.

But in all honesty how many people actually remember or care about the omnibots or most of the characters in your list? Not many. Infact they were lucky enough to even get toys in the alternators line at all. I never even heard of them untill I got this ultimate collectors book.

And Springer looks nice, but why are we doing the same characters over and over when there are so many that haven't been revisited?

There’s been 2 Springer figures in 6 years. Hardly overdoing it.

Plus we’ve pretty much gotten everybody except autobot Targetmasters and a few headmasters. It’s not like there’s that many left to modernize. Literally 13 years of CHUG. It’s lasted longer than the original G1 run.

The well is drained clean.

But it is funny to hear people say “another of this character?” When a couple years ago people were throwing hissy fits that’ characters were being made into headmasters saying “that character isn’t a headmaster. Why are they doing this?”

The point is, when it comes to new figures (either repaints or new molds) they keep going to the same well of characters. If there's another character you'd like a toy, ANY toy of, you're beat because we need Jetfire number 4 and Hot Rod number 6.

And yes, we already had one unique Springer in addition to the other Springers that everyone loved. Did we get even one unique of the guys I mentioned above? Even a repaint?

You need to realize this line isn’t Star Wars. A character who got 3 frames in Rebirth Pt 1 is not nearly as we’ll known as a main character from the ‘86 movie. Hasbro likes their deep cuts, but they also have to make money.

We did get a Cyberverse Guzzle in the DoTM line. It was an entirely new mold.

Also Hasbro just started doing Micromasters again and we have little to no idea who they'll make next, and while I doubt every character will get a new toy, most of them will.

Springer is a popular character who hasn't gotten a new toy since Generations, so of course they'd make a new one.

I agree we should get seacons.

But in all honesty how many people actually remember or care about the omnibots or most of the characters in your list? Not many. Infact they were lucky enough to even get toys in the alternators line at all. I never even heard of them untill I got this ultimate collectors book.

I have absolutely nothing to contribute appart adding to that crazy-ass quote chain!

And Springer looks nice, but why are we doing the same characters over and over when there are so many that haven't been revisited?

There’s been 2 Springer figures in 6 years. Hardly overdoing it.

Plus we’ve pretty much gotten everybody except autobot Targetmasters and a few headmasters. It’s not like there’s that many left to modernize. Literally 13 years of CHUG. It’s lasted longer than the original G1 run.

The well is drained clean.

But it is funny to hear people say “another of this character?” When a couple years ago people were throwing hissy fits that’ characters were being made into headmasters saying “that character isn’t a headmaster. Why are they doing this?”

The point is, when it comes to new figures (either repaints or new molds) they keep going to the same well of characters. If there's another character you'd like a toy, ANY toy of, you're beat because we need Jetfire number 4 and Hot Rod number 6.

And yes, we already had one unique Springer in addition to the other Springers that everyone loved. Did we get even one unique of the guys I mentioned above? Even a repaint?

You need to realize this line isn’t Star Wars. A character who got 3 frames in Rebirth Pt 1 is not nearly as we’ll known as a main character from the ‘86 movie. Hasbro likes their deep cuts, but they also have to make money.

We did get a Cyberverse Guzzle in the DoTM line. It was an entirely new mold.

Also Hasbro just started doing Micromasters again and we have little to no idea who they'll make next, and while I doubt every character will get a new toy, most of them will.

Springer is a popular character who hasn't gotten a new toy since Generations, so of course they'd make a new one.

I agree we should get seacons.

But in all honesty how many people actually remember or care about the omnibots or most of the characters in your list? Not many. Infact they were lucky enough to even get toys in the alternators line at all. I never even heard of them untill I got this ultimate collectors book.

I have absolutely nothing to contribute appart adding to that crazy-ass quote chain!

Well I did find out finally via e-mail that apparently with Pulse, Paypal only works for items in stock (cant be used on Pre-orders). I just didn't want to pay via a credit card because I don't like charges dangling on for unknown periods of time. Some companies charge you right away, others wait until the item is in stock, there is no consistency, and I don't like having to remember that *X* amount could be randomly charged to my card at any moment.

And Springer looks nice, but why are we doing the same characters over and over when there are so many that haven't been revisited?

There’s been 2 Springer figures in 6 years. Hardly overdoing it.

Plus we’ve pretty much gotten everybody except autobot Targetmasters and a few headmasters. It’s not like there’s that many left to modernize. Literally 13 years of CHUG. It’s lasted longer than the original G1 run.

The well is drained clean.

But it is funny to hear people say “another of this character?” When a couple years ago people were throwing hissy fits that’ characters were being made into headmasters saying “that character isn’t a headmaster. Why are they doing this?”

The point is, when it comes to new figures (either repaints or new molds) they keep going to the same well of characters. If there's another character you'd like a toy, ANY toy of, you're beat because we need Jetfire number 4 and Hot Rod number 6.

And yes, we already had one unique Springer in addition to the other Springers that everyone loved. Did we get even one unique of the guys I mentioned above? Even a repaint?

You need to realize this line isn’t Star Wars. A character who got 3 frames in Rebirth Pt 1 is not nearly as we’ll known as a main character from the ‘86 movie. Hasbro likes their deep cuts, but they also have to make money.

We did get a Cyberverse Guzzle in the DoTM line. It was an entirely new mold.

Also Hasbro just started doing Micromasters again and we have little to no idea who they'll make next, and while I doubt every character will get a new toy, most of them will.

Springer is a popular character who hasn't gotten a new toy since Generations, so of course they'd make a new one.

I agree we should get seacons.

But in all honesty how many people actually remember or care about the omnibots or most of the characters in your list? Not many. Infact they were lucky enough to even get toys in the alternators line at all. I never even heard of them untill I got this ultimate collectors book.

I have absolutely nothing to contribute appart adding to that crazy-ass quote chain!

In order to comply with the FTC's endorsement guidelines, we hereby inform this site's viewers that we occasionally receive sample products, content, or other forms of media from various companies in order for us to provide content of interest to our readers. Some of the content on this site are sponsored posts for which we have been compensated. Some of the links to external sites posted on this site may automatically be converted to an affiliate link for which we may be compensated. We are a participant in several affiliate programs with retailers such as Amazon, Walmart, Target, eBay, and other affiliate programs. These affiliate advertising programs are designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to those affiliated sites.