For Muslims and non-Muslims alike, the stock image of an Islamic scholar is a gray-bearded man. Women tend to be seen as the subjects of Islamic law rather than its shapers. And while some opportunities for religious education do exist for women – the prestigious Al-Azhar University in Cairo has a womenâ€™s college, for example, and there are girlsâ€™ madrasas and female study groups in mosques and private homes – cultural barriers prevent most women in the Islamic world from pursuing such studies. Recent findings by a scholar at the Oxford Center for Islamic Studies in Britain, however, may help lower those barriers and challenge prevalent notions of womenâ€™s roles within Islamic society. Mohammad Akram Nadwi, a 43-year-old Sunni alim, or religious scholar, has rediscovered a long-lost tradition of Muslim women teaching the Koran, transmitting hadith (deeds and sayings of the Prophet Muhammad (s)) and even making Islamic law as jurists.

Akram embarked eight years ago on a single-volume biographical dictionary of female hadith scholars, a project that took him trawling through biographical dictionaries, classical texts, madrasa chronicles and letters for relevant citations. â€œI thought Iâ€™d find maybe 20 or 30 women,â€ he says. To date, he has found 8,000 of them, dating back 1,400 years, and his dictionary now fills 40 volumes. Itâ€™s so long that his usual publishers, in Damascus and Beirut, have balked at the project, though an English translation of his preface – itself almost 400 pages long – will come out in England this summer. (Akram has talked with Prince Turki al-Faisal, Saudi Arabiaâ€™s former ambassador to the United States, about the possibility of publishing the entire work through his Riyadh-based foundation.)

The dictionaryâ€™s diverse entries include a 10th-century Baghdad-born jurist who traveled through Syria and Egypt, teaching other women; a female scholar – or muhaddithat – in 12th-century Egypt whose male students marveled at her mastery of a â€œcamel loadâ€ of texts; and a 15th-century woman who taught hadith at the Prophetâ€™s grave in Medina, one of the most important spots in Islam. One seventh-century Medina woman who reached the academic rank of jurist issued key fatwas on hajj rituals and commerce; another female jurist living in medieval Aleppo not only issued fatwas but also advised her far more famous husband on how to issue his.

Not all of these women scholars were previously unknown. Many Muslims acknowledge that Islam has its learned women, particularly in the field of hadith, starting with the Prophetâ€™s wife Aisha. And several Western academics have written on womenâ€™s religious education. About a century ago, the Hungarian Orientalist Ignaz Goldziher estimated that about 15 percent of medieval hadith scholars were women. But Akramâ€™s dictionary is groundbreaking in its scope.

Indeed, read today, when many Muslim women still donâ€™t dare pray in mosques, let alone lecture leaders in them, Akramâ€™s entry for someone like Umm al-Darda, a prominent jurist in seventh-century Damascus, is startling. As a young woman, al-Darda used to sit with male scholars in the mosque, talking shop. â€œIâ€™ve tried to worship Allah in every way,â€ she wrote, â€œbut Iâ€™ve never found a better one than sitting around, debating other scholars.â€ She went on to teach hadith and fiqh, or law, at the mosque, and even lectured in the menâ€™s section; her students included the caliph of Damascus. She shocked her contemporaries by praying shoulder to shoulder with men – a nearly unknown practice, even now – and issuing a fatwa, still cited by modern scholars, that allowed women to pray in the same position as men.

Itâ€™s after the 16th century that citations of women scholars dwindle. Some historians venture that this is because Islamic education grew more formal, excluding women as it became increasingly oriented toward establishing careers in the courts and mosques. (Strangely enough, Akram found that this kind of exclusion also helped women become better scholars. Because they didnâ€™t hold official posts, they had little reason to invent or embellish prophetic traditions.)

Akramâ€™s work has led to accusations that he is championing free mixing between men and women, but he says that is not so. He maintains that women students should sit at a discreet distance from their male classmates or co-worshipers, or be separated by a curtain. (The practice has parallels in Orthodox Judaism.) The Muslim women who taught men â€œare part of our history,â€ he says. â€œIt doesnâ€™t mean you have to follow them. Itâ€™s up to people to decide.â€

Neverthless, Akram says he hopes that uncovering past hadith scholars could help reform present-day Islamic culture. Many Muslims see historical precedents – particularly when they date back to the golden age of Muhammad – as blueprints for sound modern societies and look to scholars to evaluate and interpret those precedents. Muslim feminists like the Moroccan writer Fatima Mernissi and Kecia Ali, a professor at Boston University, have cast fresh light on womenâ€™s roles in Islamic law and history, but their worldview – and their audiences – are largely Western or Westernized. Akram is a working alim, lecturing in mosques and universities and dispensing fatwas on issues like inheritance and divorce. â€œHere youâ€™ve got a guy whoâ€™s coming from the tradition, who knows the stuff and whoâ€™s able to give us that level of detail which is missing in the self-proclaimed progressive Muslim writers,â€ says James Piscatori, a professor of Islamic Studies at Oxford University.

The erosion of womenâ€™s religious education in recent times, Akram says, reflects â€œdecline in every aspect of Islam.â€ Flabby leadership and a focuson politics rather than scholarship has left Muslims ignorant of their ownhistory. Islamâ€™s current cultural insecurity has been bad for both its scholarship and its women, Akram says. â€œOur traditions have grown weak, and when people are weak, they grow cautious. When theyâ€™re cautious, they donâ€™t give their women freedoms.â€

When Akram lectures, he dryly notes, women are more excited by this history than men. To persuade reluctant Muslims to educate their girls, Akram employs a potent debating strategy: he compares the status quo to the age of al jahiliya, the Arabic term for the barbaric state of pre-Islamic Arabia.

(Osama Bin Laden and Sayyid Qutb, the godfather of modern Islamic extremism, have employed the comparison to very different effect.) Barring Muslim women from education and religious authority, Akram argues, is akin to the pre-Islamic custom of burying girls alive. â€œI tell people, â€˜God has given girls qualities and potential,â€™ â€œ he says. â€œIf they arenâ€™t allowed to develop them, if they arenâ€™t provided with opportunities to study and learn, itâ€™s basically a live burial.â€

When I spoke with him, Akram invoked a favorite poem, â€œElegy Written in a Country Churchyard,â€ Thomas Grayâ€™s 18th-century lament for dead English farmers. â€œGray said that villagers could have been like Milton,â€ if only theyâ€™d had the chance, Akram observes. â€œMuslim women are in the same situation. There could have been so many Miltons.â€

Carla Power is a London-based journalist who writes about Islamic issues.