Hello, is there anything that makes people more likely to comment on your article? I have so far posted two SCPs (one was deleted, the second one is still up) and they seem to be getting downvotes without any comments on how to improve them and all criticism coming from people up-, or neutral voting.

I know people are not required to justify their voting, but is there any method that could get more people to write about their dislikes? And yes, I got my scips criticized by few people on the forums and chat before posting them.

The critique forums and chat really are the best place to get critique. All other reasons aside, any feedback you get from posting something that definitely isn't ready is going to be at least a little… prickly.

If you're having trouble getting in-depth critique, PMing the critique team is a good way to go.

And yes, I got my scips criticized by few people on the forums and chat before posting them.

Do note that a SCP is generally not considered "ready" until multiple people say they'll upvote it or can no longer find issues with it. Just fixing the problems found in round 1 of criticism won't cut it; sometimes other errors were masked by the ones pointed out, or in fixing the old errors, you make new ones.

Yep. I personally don't post anything until I know at least five to ten people (hopefully a couple of them people who've been on the site for a few years and know what they're expecting) will upvote the work when it goes live.