Conscientious human beings should not limit their consciousness to matters of survival. This blog empowers those with conscience whilst enhancing the conscious. It is my mission to prove that my most bitter enemies are my friends. If I achieve that in life, I have been truly human.

Tag Archives: ISIS

Traditionally I have released themed articles in time for Christmas and New Year’s here. Though I broke from full time work mid-December, sadly all literary efforts ended up needing to be devoted to a wordy masterpiece that was eventually published on 3rd January at another of my websites. Next day, I began work on this entry with intensity. Prior to putting pen to paper (as it were) again, I had checked my “in progress or to be written” open correspondence file and stumbled upon a dusty old archive. Back then (2014), I was still vaguely attached to certain pioneer movements who systematically work through “conspiracy theories”. In that capacity efforts were partly devoted to upturning stones and exploding myths with ambition towards revealing the best approximations of pure truth hidden in a volatile ocean of misconceptions. The title of the original manuscript (that was used as the inspiration for this essay) was “Prophesies, Predictions and Preconditioning”. Controversially minimal, rather aptly only one note was attached to the file.

US Agency for International Development – “population reduction” Program Director, Reimart Ravenholt, reputedly aimed to sterilise one quarter of the world’s women (1977) just before the introduction of AIDS

We have all been exposed in some way to the excesses of establishment fuelled negativity generated towards conspiracy theories, reflecting “theorists” and the “horrors” of an open unregulated internet. Needless to say, ironical official government theories and parallel conspiracies are often largely true, but also divisively true. I’ll contend stories that go the other direction invariably promote outright lies. How did Hitler put it?

“If you are going to tell a lie, make sure it is a big one. Tell it over and over until everyone has no choice but to believe it.”

The real scandal, therefore, is found in the wide reliance on best-of-breeds “obtuse reasoning”. By example, Imagine you see before you a picture of some sort of idyllic scene beneath an airy bright blue sky. Location is unimportant. Out of view by several kilometres and completely omitted from the picture is a topology that would be described very differently. This “slant” image per my example comprises of several giant industrial chimney stacks that continuously and voluminously belch hideous gaseous plumes into the heavens. The effect promotes the unruly build-up of flailing, filthy black smog whose pungent foulness seems to permanently stain the clouds. All this chaos is out-of-view on our imaginary idyllic canvass, but, given a wider picture, conspiracies might focus on the negative in isolation “for impact”. The political arena (which absolutely underscores the establishment heart) champions identical rose tinted duplicity as there are no or next to no dissenting voices prepared to vocalise beyond standardised obtuse reasoning mandates (i.e. such as choosing to ignore industrial waste, in my example) and that is where the major issue lies for governments (and those that call governments to account) of the world in general.

Significant changes to my original (2014) conceptual title were made with the additions “consensus view” and, I must say rather ambiguous, “spirited souls”. Consensus view somewhat echoes another archived “to be written” memo, contritely titled “Attitude”. One note and single line “a bad attitude is good” confidently anticipates intentions, which, of course, clearly subliminally emphasises the power objective belying propagandas. Even so there is a correlation I haven’t discussed yet. Consensus view directly impacts obtuse reasoning. In fact, so much so, it beckons the hard to confirm question; did obtuse reasoning pre-empt consensus view or was it the other way round? This is, I might add, a question committed conspiracy theorists invariably fail to address and one of the pivotal arguments I use against most so-called “alternative” views.

I note just about all views either respond to relative ignorance or general superstition (deliberate or otherwise). Others will parasite off different consensuses whose varied appraisals of content boils down to the same equally acrid mulch that lends favour to official decorum. In addition to the syndrome, I have also observed that if one “camp” says “yes”, the alternative instinctively emphatically responds “no”. Considering this “us” versus “them” dichotomy, it seems entirely plausible for me to at least “determine” that a sole basic planner might be scripting an “ongoing without end” (mock) contest. Currently this is fought between “that which is official” (good) and “the antipathy towards anything official” (evil). Doubtlessly my theoretical planners’ will (desire) would be (perhaps posthumously) advanced by pyramidal structures in precisely the same manner (and possible extension of) the “good government” versus “evil anarchist” visceral war that has been expressed through the ages.

Speaking of good and evil, discussions about spirit and soul can lead to equally emotive bipartisan debates. It seems that which isn’t solid, under terms of atheism, grants indefinite license to create all manners of bullshit. Though outpourings about the immaterial might generate “fashionable” truths on occasion, because everything in that domain is perceived to be unprovable, the nicest speaker may as well seek an appreciative audience. In other words, for affairs that transcend physicality, truth is superfluous. For example many believe the current pope “must” know something about Godbecause he is head of the Catholic Church. In this context, whenever the pope makes a grotesque revelation about the paranormal (which includes everything spiritual) it must be true to believers. Conversely, per identical obtuse reasoning, anything that contradicts, defies or invalidates the pope’s “truths” are unquestionably (the equivalent of) revisionist. Conversely, the lone agent of prohibition blocking any pope’s charismatic attempts to “pioneer new divinities” is tradition. Traditionalism acts as guide, juror and potential censor. To make matters worse, most religions’ customs and cultures have become so bloated there is near zero opportunity for fundamental or symptomatic evolutionary change.

It should hardly surprise, given that background, my occasional verbal intercourse incidents with the “very religious” over the years has produced little more than persistent reactions against unresolvable lop sided circular arguments. Prognosis of opinions, in terms of spirit and soul from the philosophical standpoint, make entertaining review. For my research, by example, the average very religious person will only identify superficial differences between spirit and soul and, when challenged, will consciously demonstrate an overall inability to draw on formal assessable basis to separate the two. Quintessentially and rather conclusively, matters to do with God to them (the overly religious) are definitely not meant to be understood. Arguably, the syndrome might well be appraised a symptom of feeble misappropriation of the concept glibly termed “blind faith” (comprehended best when paraphrased “blind ignorance for ignorant people”). Of course the problem with calculated blind denial of truth is eventually gulfs of misunderstanding form basis for decision making. Predictably consequential judgements invariably have cause to become so riddled with error; choices of the poorest quality can be exalted as “good practice” (sic). It could be said, cultures that cover up social ignorance make fodders for war.

Though the path to enlightenment is the antipathy of indoctrination, the permanently blind or visually impaired never see colour. The same can be said of those sighted whose deliberate misappropriation of ability is designated to spurn competent recollection of inherent truths. Even so, I do occasionally like to tease intellectual lepers in the spirit of fun. Most recently I have been bestowed with a power of existential knowledge that is so expansive, my “armour chest” (so to speak) is as big as Pandora’s Box, but (and contrary to that which is rational) this was not always the case. Tedium of past pointless cogitations can be no more praise God and that assures my altercations with dogmatism are blissfully short and absurdly sweet. Direct discussions of this type have included musings on matters spiritual, I recall. In that capacity, most unmoved “believers” would focus on the intolerable importance of a mythical unknown “Saviour”, whose sole identifiable miracle was to become posthumously “known” by that consequence. Their reasoning, if I dare call it that, proposes an angelic domino effect that replicates His “appearance” to feverishly ignorant folks who, once bitten by this deistic virus, become insanely obsessed with “succumbing” to all associated infectious dogmas no matter how spurious. I have, consequentially, needed to learn to agitate, shimmy and side-step their rebuttals at light speed. Nothing is worse than becoming bogged down with aimless nihilism (yes, wilful procrastination is an abject form of nihilism). No fraudulent messiah will cover up that fact.

Hit ‘em hard and hit ‘em quick is my way. Tried and tested many, many times, the best attack strategy against religious fanatics is to haggle for the promotion of sincere spirituality whilst warding off the fake stuff of fluff and fantasy. Always ask direct questions of the type “what is a soul?” Neverrequest, only demand answers. Even so, it is wise to cast some background before diving straight in with the hard questions. These guys (the terminally religious) are experts at dilly-dallying. Without clear defining lines, you are only guaranteed to generate countering verbal diarrhoea. The step approach seems to work best. That first step towards (and let’s harness the mission here) inducing another’s demystification is what I fondly term “bursting the bubble”. The smartest and easiest way to lampoon aimlessness is by the removal of all distracting debris. Religious folks fear authenticity’s values (sincere truth is symptomatically gnarled) as though it was the devil in making himself, so if any vassal has the fortitude to impress any kind of picture at all; it is bound to present “foggily” at best. Thus, step one towards demystification has to be the “total removal of existence”. That’s the removal of everything and not merely convenient bits that “obstruct” wider considerations.

It’s funny but the “very religious” (particularly Christians) are not “very” bright (light, logos, logic, intelligence) and not at all spiritual (creative). This is best highlighted by the commonest answer to my rhetorical question (and primary step towards disillusionment) “what’s left after a freak disappearance of everything?” Standard feedback to this is the antiphon “nothing”. Ok, I usually paraphrase the question differently. I usually ask, “If God removed everything you know to be “existence” in an instant, what would be left?” Responses are mostly the same. Occasionally a smart ass retorts, “Well, [my] God wouldn’t do that.” Look, I know blasphemy was one of the great Pharisaic deceptions that has somehow become common doctrine now (i.e. Moses’ “Commandments”), but telling God what “He” can or cannot do, well I think that is taking the biscuit. The objection can be fairly easily dispelled anyway. Maybe try “use your imagination, if you’ve got one” for starters. I admit I did have one really stubborn guy once who dug his heels in so deep, it seemed like nothing would move that rock. Eventually I came up with the master stroke. “Imagine, as a test, which was associated with the Day of Judgement, God removed existence – temporarily. I can’t say why, because we both know He is allowed to work in mysterious ways”, I beamed. Finally he accepted the “mysterious ways” paradox.

So, the predominant answer to ending existence was there was nothing left. Of course, this pre-empts potentially hilarious responding high jinx but you need to be there to appreciate them. Watch the Christian squirm when you accuse him of being (…drum roll) “an atheist”. Well, this is true! A conventional atheist “believes” there is nothing beyond material existence. Be it there is much they (non-believers) cannot explain and many “miracles” (far more miraculous than the Saviour could have ever concocted) coincided with “Big Bang”, those adepts-in-waiting with suitably “muted vision” will easily succumb to fantasy; Christians includedit seems. But hard line worshippers are resilient if nothing else. They recover from knocks in poor taste quickly. My uncompromising stick-in-the-mud partner also predictably fell into the “nothing” trap moments after expressing “absolute devotion” to God. Don’t you see the irony? He didn’t, but I can. Anyway, with regards supposedly devout Christians, I learnt nothing can also be something, because after existence vanished at the drop of a hat (and a lot of head scratching), “the void” (per se) unexplainably and conveniently cantransform into “heaven” depending on circumstances (which God only knows). Heaven, according to these boneheads, is a place of bliss, where no malice is possible. Complimenting that warped tradition, it also happens to be a place of pure goodness that exclusively only “lets in” Christians. Avowed to avenge the Jews (canned laughter), I shall now attempt to demonstrate how to turn conceptual heaven into hell “for dummies”.

Hell, heck, damnation, call it what you will, causes Christians awkward problems. It is a “known of” place that invariably deflects consideration, less chaotic focus. Perhaps we see evidence of symptomatic conditioning here. The Baptist championed ancient proverb “Hear no evil, speak no evil, do no evil” humbles Hades, Beelzebub (or Yaldebroath or Adam incidentally) and everything from the dark side to obsoleteness. Given my slapstick up to this point, a smidgen more jollity surely wouldn’t harm? Let’s face it, to valiantly deflate the Christian’s “heaven” the intellectual champion simply has to state the obvious. Therefore, next supplementary question (and step two of this mission towards demystification) has to be “what about heck?” Now “evil people and non-Christians” must go somewhere post “expiry”, right? And that ponderable pitches our devout enthusiasts somewhere between an intellectual rock and a hard place.

They all know there is “limited space” in purgatory. Considering that even Jesus recognised and apparently mentioned hell several times (albeit periodically paraphrased it as the “outer darkness where beasts wail and gnash their teeth”), the paradox cannot be “wished away” even by the puniest of minds or, rather, not at least in serious discussions with spiritually “highbrow” strangers. Every Christian I have interviewed has reluctantly contended that hell not only “exists”, but resides in a no man’s land that is beyondexistence, To make matters worse, due to the absence of time/space, it has to be right on the doorstep of heaven. That leaves but one option to save the average Christian libido. Conceptualisations of the scripts I am sure vary in personality, but, suffice to say, to put reasoning “in a nutshell”, for the zealousexistence is the proverbial “wall” that separatesheaven and hell. Ironically, this is closer to the truth than the feeble minded might imagine.

Still, when it comes to nether regions, the Christian’s imagination is honed to peak optimisation. Everyone (to degrees) tries to impress what they want to be (true) over what is, but some manage to proffer vanity to its limit. Apparently a moat with crocs teaming to the brim may be conveniently positioned between heaven and heck in order to split oblivion into two sacred but by no means related domains. That, believe it or not, was a genuine piece of feedback I had received in response to the heaven/hell dilemma. I don’t know why I didn’t see it before. Ok, I am aware the Victorian era British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli is attributed as saying, “sarcasm is the lowest form of wit”, but an occasional facetious bite does enhance pantomime. And these hard line Christians would make me chuckle on a regular basis, was it not for the fact the issues exposed are the very same ones God wants us to fix. Segregated heavens caused the problem with existence in the first place, amply explained by the Gnostics (those interested in knowing more would do well to start with John’s Apochryphon in the Hag Hammadi scrolls). “Branding” people evil is a form of evil. We only have to look to the sage Krishna who eloquently identified, “[True] spirituality brings to freedom, so forces of evil paralyse (censor and destroy)”.

Putting Christians and other raging fanatics to one side, if I could summarise everyone’s honest attitude towards most others (and particularly strangers), sentiment as dialogue would be expressed in the following way:

“I say “fuck you” (to everyone that knows something I don’t know).

(When I presume to know everything), I say “fuck you” too.”

It is high time humanity moved off the perilous “look after number one” course. It’s killing you – literally. All wars are sold on the look after number one excuse. “One”, in this instance, is the “great group”, albeit sometimes the great group can delineate into strata subgroups within groups. Look how Japanese Americans were marginalised throughout US involvement in the Second Word War. Propagandists maintain spin cycles that presume everyone can and will be conditioned with depressing consistency. To the propagandist a human being is a wilful slave, so marketing programs are designed to drive and capture recruits. Per that model, the underscored narrative line must never falter. Paradoxes, contradictions and anomalies are verboten, Results speak for themselves. These illustrious tailors have been remarkably successful in their quest. It seems as though there is an endless supply of soldiers ready to apply relish to squandering their own lives for absurdity. Worse still, licensed murderersmaykill with impunity.

We now know when it comes to matters of spirit and soul, hard line Christians are weak on explanations to say the least. Indeed, to them separation of “roles” usually proves to be more paradoxical even than the physical placement of heaven and hell. Though I’ve been highlighting devout Christians up to now, no single person I have ever corresponded with has comprehensively been able to demonstrate correct visualisation of the soul/spirit “value base”. Many, in fact just about all, graft spiritual qualities onto souls. Maybe, and though rarely specifically identified as such, the soul is deemed to have some association with (if not also made of) light. God’s truepurpose behind the deliberate placement of spirit and soul is about as alien as the average extra-terrestrial (and I am referring to the ones that remain permanently unknown here).

In fairness, identifying the soul, in particular, can be pretty tricky. When you don’t know what to look for, cohesive apperception becomes exponentially more challenging. For instance, the sincere atheist would deny the soul as it is immaterial. My own book The Beauty of Existence Decoded attempts to expose the chassis that tenures the bare bones of reality. In doing so, I tend to complicate things for perception. I introduce conflicting truths. Top down view is far simpler and easier to understand, but that visualisation (even when flawlessly presented) doesn’t come to grips with “processes”. How is the result of a soccer match worth anything if the actual game is unavailable for scrutiny? Also, contrary to popular “belief”, there is no “group” or “cosmic” mind mimicking divine government (beyond the Tamarian, from which “Adam” or Yaldebroath was a consequence). Christ’s Consciousness (as is embraced by the Catholic Church) is Sephardic make-believe, nonsense, bullshit designed to enslave the gullible for the overall empowerment of those that control. Paranormal interventions, extra-terrestrial/dimensional influencers and noisome human charlatans routinely issue dogmatic propagandas tuned to deliver grades of indoctrination? Yes to all of those, but no to an effervescent meddling God. Then again, it should be noted The Prime Source (extra-terrestrialsignature signifying the Almighty God) does “mess with” all DNA, but that’s moving along a tangent best explored another time.

For now, I will try and précis the “lite” versions of spirit and soul in the simplest of terms. Presuming there isn’t a transcendental “presiding” ultra-group that contravenes causal oversight (which there isn’t by the way, unless we factor in the Tamarian, which travels all the up the astral states), the spirit is “light” and the soul is “darkness”. Yes, it is as simple as that. The spirit and the soul are indelible partners of the Buddhist concept Yin Yang. Of course, that motivates distinct moral dilemmas. Born again Christians have been indoctrinated into prostrating before dogmatic evil heralds from darkness and “light vanquishes all evil” (which when correctly translated actually means wisdom conquers doubt). Considered reasoning behind their beliefs are “normally” obtuse, generally speaking, minds are notably possessed in this specific instance. Dangerous, divisive traditional views impede valid interpretations. For example, given the knowledge the soul is darkness; does that mean it should be denied? Emphatically no, for conceptual evil heralding from darkness is one of the almighty religious deceits. Promoted near universally the malice is aimed squarely at corrupting the identity of the essence of humanity (collectively bound by the Tamarian under the framework of “Adam” of course). Origins of the true fabrication of evil are all but forgotten. We need to hark back to the creation of the material universe to appreciate precise logic behind myths. Can I say “once upon a time”? Anyway, an incredibly long time ago there was an age when (as the Gnostics and Babylonians put it) “God slumbered”, but then a schism in bliss (God’s collective uniform state) caused the fractal development of aeons (distinct traits of God) before they were able to manifest. One, who is fondly remembered as “Sophia” (or wisdom) decided to drive manifestation beyond bliss. Consequentially holistic existence came into being on her (his) terms. I shall now attempt to describe the process.

At this time, before there was linear time, there was nothing but nothing. And from nothing Sophia (who, though the Gnostics termed as “female”, embraced male spiritual qualities with feminine care) caused an imperceptible rip that had the potential to become a gateway to something. The gateway did manifest and later became known as “Satan” (which the most ancient ones called “blessed”). Modern astrologers would correctly identify it as a star. Thus, strictly speaking, Satan was first known as the “Blessed Star”. Only long after when Satan was a “distant memory” did negative aspersions attempt to distort truth. So much so, the fantasy that is popularised today (and which may only be regarded as a vile anathema to truth) transcended due diligence to become “common doctrine”. Without Satan’s gateway existence could not have manifest for there was no light then. Upon Sophia’s divine directive, the heavens were instantaneously created and segregated by seven spherical divides which would later become generally known as the heavenly states (each representing the fundamental expressive traits of God). Per her (his) plan, existence equated to and was astral purity.

Yet, as the “Holy Spirit” (created by the aeons to be their corporeal prophet and arbiter) predicted, God did not appreciate His slumber with the others detached. The rest, the dark, needed to join the light for they felt excluded. However, Satan’s gateway was only commissioned to release light. Potently inventive, in order to join the brethren, darkness reconfigured as forms of light (atomic pulse) and this confused the giant star. Still, Satan remained resilient to the cause. He kept the dark (but not hostile) forces at bay for as long as he was able, but more and more joined the throngs to create overwhelming pressure. Eventually nothing (even light) could access the vent or pass the gateway. It was thoroughly blocked. But the build-up kept building and building and the pressure mounted and mounted. Something had to “give” and eventually in one all mighty “blow”, dark matter overwhelmed the Blessed Star’s magnetic field (which, ironically, without dark matter, would never have been) and powered into existence. From that moment onwards reality (per Sophia’s “plan”) changed forever (as all “stars” have the same basic redundancy flaw). The material plane was born and this, in its entirety, is how the ancients’ originally defined “evil”. To them materialistic peoples (or “materialists”) were the roots of all evil. Spiritual, astral, faith-driven bodies preceded goodness.

Observance of modern day Satanism is the evolution of mumbo jumbo (begun perhaps by 1800’s industrialists) output under the spurious auspices of [secret] esoteric societies. These “energy portals” (as the Draco call them) were manipulated by the Sephardim and other external entities when society members attempted to contact the “other world” (usually by séance). Hitler’s association with the German Thule Movement is widely publicised. Ancients taught that Satan, in the capacity of Blessed Star, had been conquered by matter and, thus, forces aligned with matter were the “evil” that prohibited pure (spiritual) existence. There is no greater materialistic soul than a sceptical industrialist, so it was in the best interest of principled commerce (beginning long before biblical times) to deliberately craft the Satan deception (obscuring the truth for “prosperity’s sake”). It was the materialists that the ancient ones warned us (the spiritual) of. Oversimplifying truth in misleading ways, usurpers (Pharisees), discombobulated the ancients’ wisdom into new terms per their gross distortion. Corresponding with that trickery, Satan’s gate now deliberately let in “evil” (under those terms, how on Earth does satanic equate to “wrong doing” anyway?) which is an absolute whopping great lie.

Regardless of the tarnished fact, matter is not going to “pop out of existence” (Satan’s volcanic atomic eruption misconstrued as “Big Bang” is another industrialist backed outrightcon. Details of which can be found in my book). Because of their basic (but unavoidable) design flaws, all stars will vent dark matter at the end of their useful cycles. Derelicts are posthumously known as “black holes” (even Israel’s champion Stephen Hawking has had to grudgingly admit that vanquished stars spew “something” into the cosmos). Interestingly, there were no souls prior to the introduction of dark matter. That makes them a phenomenon intrinsically connected with the manifestation of existence (adrift of spirituality). Drawing from my The Beauty of Existence Decoded, according to science the average sized [human] body has around 5 x 10 to the power 27 souls. Well, actually, science doesn’t mention souls at all, but if it understood the transcendental purpose atoms play in respect to life, that would become the formal science assessment.

I referenced Charles Hall’s photon theory once before. Hall extrapolates Albert Einstein’s “missing fields” and this stresses how poorly materialism conceptualises the quantum layer. Junk science may attempt to satirically ridicule DNA, but the real farce is DNA can only be found in black light, whose mechanics draw out relative gibberish from traditional physicists. If only they had studied at Atlantis and learnt of the significance of the Tamarian. Nuclear tyrant Oppenheimer’s psychotic ignorance (domino effect collapsing all matter) does not excuse him. Even so, and though I haven’t cited the paper, I am led to believe the Australian Chris Illert has been able to prove Theosophical “opinions” on the structure of atoms reflecting information channelled via séance at the turn of last century by conventional means. Alleged extra-terrestrial visitors who resided in Spain in the 1950’s have also presented a variation of the same basic outline. It is one I favour as it is the easiest to understand (unlike the unnecessarily convoluted clap trap that coordinates supposedly cutting edge mainstream theories that “shape” the endless “new discoveries” churned out of the Hadron Collider and other sensational “props”). Unworldly “Ummos” informed us that atoms have three “light phases” working in unison – the upper, lower and middle frequencies. Ancient Atlantis sages have been attributed as having the ability to manipulate these pulses with their minds only. They apparently did this well enough to alter signal properties. Their great alchemists could turn anything into gold with no need of mundane chemicals or flasks.

The Atlanteans knew that each atom is a miniscule piece of subspace real estate. In addition, according to their Tamarian philosophy, all atoms (the group) can be perceived as an expanding, but permanently interconnected mesh. I plan to expand on this illumination in the future and have already headlined a blank manuscript. “Does the Draconians’ False (Light) Matrix Leverage off the Ancient Atlantis Tamarian?” that will likely find a place at my other website that focuses on the paranormal. Returning to ordinary matters, mainstream quantum mechanics generally (and erroneously) evaluates the symptomatic effects elevated by force fields aimed at “containing” each centrifugal nucleus. In this capacity aroms generate the pulse or “echo” of holographic solidity which (amongst others things) emphasises mass (or magnetism). Specifically tuned to our dimension, the mechanism logically has no influence on other density fields “out of frequency range”. Were our pedestrian sciences to become acutely coherent on the subject (which is an unlikely prospect, given “industrial” materialism mandate), “frequency catalyser” models (functionality extra-terrestrial Zeta Grey Beings have been trying to raise awareness of via “crop circle” diagrams) might be best applied at the conceptualisation stages.

In fairness (and credit where credit’s due) string and super string theory do have the potential to decode the atom, but not on current course. As Suzy Hanson identified (details are unspecific) in her book The Dual Soul Connection, [Zeta, though she doesn’t specifically identify the fact] Grey Beings were able to (somehow and much to the bafflement of astrophysicist Rudy Schild) “switch off” an atom’s energy field (which also explains how their partner “Mantis Beings” are able to travel through the eye of a particle, by reputation). Atomic frequency harnesses all dimensions and contains all time, so these little babies are important to those that understand them. I pose the question (although I don’t formally supply answers) as to whether “time lords” could travel both ways once access to the ultimate dimension (Ummos called number ten) was available without restriction. Incidentally, I believe the Ummos were referring ten fundamental “states” of existence, which included the seven heavenly spheres. To confuse matters, these are routinely broken up into dimensions, densities and eras.

Switched on readers at this point (doubtlessly after some bafflement) might have encouraged sufficient resolve to pique a burning request of me. If “atoms” deliver souls, then does that mean inanimate objects, such as rocks [and stuff], have souls too? My goodness, my audience is on the ball today. That is an excellent and most perceptive question but I’m pleased to say the answer is “yes”. However I need to also qualify that souls contained in “rocks and stuff” are clinically different (dissimilar frequency “keys”) to life souls. Indeed, as a soul travels up the astral ladder partnering with spirituality, complimenting developmental quantities are laterally progressive. Readers with genius ambition would surely ask why [the need for all the subterfuge]? The answer to that is as plain as it is Earth shattering. In effect God “broke” after the initial creation of heavenly existence (long before material existence existed). Astral soul progress is part of the healing process, which, according to the Aryan Vedas, will take in the order of 311 trillion of our years to “complete” (when existence will revert to bliss?). Therefore, my apologies to charged crusaders, but you don’t conquer Rome in a day.

The soul is simple and complex. As I mentioned before, the most uniform way of “representing” it is as darkness, but that won’t mean too much to those that haven’t come to terms with the powerful structure of darkness. Identical to light, darkness is a hierarchy and atoms account for the very lowest level. In fact there is even a black spectrum which mirrors light in reverse. If I take the human body as an example, we are made of particles which collectivise to build our cell structures. Cells join to form into organs and other components. Some of these amass to collaborate into value added networks, such as the nervous system. But in supreme control of the body is a very special “high level” attribute, known simply as “the mind”. Correspondingly, we can argue our bodies are actually “pyramidal structures” below it.

Soul “categorisation” also identifies well with parts (and their roles) of the human body, but complexes are not matched. It is important to acknowledge the “soul” is not an individual but, rather, the collaboration of “many”. Every soul motivated decision is the result of a reaction (to be deciphered as original thought) that is backed by a “chorus”. Whether inanimate or animate, individual things that are the many parts that make up the material plane are all individually composed of huge numbers of atoms. There are no exceptions to that rule at the lowest level (and that is the reason material existence is very inflexible when benchmarked against the astral). Were all atoms to be given pivotal political decision making roles, “logical chaos” would reign. Once again, as is the case with components of the human body, individual atoms join to create “guilds”. These, in turn, establish “networks”, up and up until only a handful of respondents actually voice “the obvious” (utopian coordination of harmonic resonance). This small managerial posse (which mimics the indecisiveness of every stable mind) is the best approximation of something that might “fit” the distorted tradition (an anathema) humans identify as “soul”. It is a construct, of course, because that is all it can be.

To continue with any authority, simplicity is no longer plausible in treatment of this subject matter. The dedicated and intellectually superior are advised to read on. Others may leave to make tea, feed the pig or entertain lighter but meaningful preoccupations. So, without further ado, continuation now becomes much more complex as there are other aspects to this conundrum that either identify with or are regularly “confused as” the soul. For instance, what are the differences between the conscious, subconscious (or unconscious) and the super conscious in respect to the above? Is the “soul” an integral part of each or does it branch in order to satisfy differing needs/perspectives of severed states or apportions? Classically, those devoutly religious magically reconstruct the higher self as a proto-soul. Moreover (emphasising the “ego” is profoundly misunderstood too) the higher self is most commonly transformed (a construct) into something that might equate to the (perceived as) best bits of the collective egotistic wisdom of popular “TV personalities” (or akin “role model” devices), so it isn’t really the higher self at all. Thus, routine deduction suggests each proto-soul has to be a crafty caricature of the true higher self (which is not formally recognised as such) and this is a spectral aspect of the spirit. If the spirit is to be loosely classed as “graded astral compliance”, then the ego (consciousness) would represent the collective lowers states. In toto, the subconscious coordinates mid-range value expressions and the super conscious is the closest approximation to “heaven on Earth” for a living, terrestrial body.

If only convergence was that simple. You see the ego is actually a figment which is comprised of flawless light body, “hard” physical body and various supplementary external components (superficially attached). Ego is a “bundle”. It is a conscious spirited material (soul) cooperative. The ego is often misconstrued as arrogance. It is not arrogance per se, although obstinate behaviour would be very representative of selfish nature and self is the epitome of ego. Like the soul, the self is a multi-faceted product. No one thing is particularly reflected, but overall a noteworthy identity (classically termed as “the personality”) presides over the directive life force (coordinating work towards common interests of the parts). Dramatic sustained personality changes (commonly after trauma) signify swaps of ego ownership. Souls are hierarchically stronger as they are aloof (even though a soul’s lateral development directly corresponds with the ego’s life course). It may only be a figment of time, but the ego is so highly regarded (by The Prime Source), after the power source (spirit) decides it is ready to detach from the body (the stage that is commonly known as “death”) a complete record is preserved for prosperity. Each “record” lives on in void format. The Babylonians called these “shadows”. Shadows are the limbo stages between incarnations. They notably factor when unforeseen circumstances lead to unprepared deaths.

The way a life is preserved directly corresponds with how “time” is structured and works (hence the importance of atomic particles). Linear perception only succumbs to the illusion of causal reality (note: this should not to be compared against erroneous “so-called” causality). Similar to the way a computer’s hard drive functions, the script permitting time sits constantly in the present (which is actually past, present and future combined). Via plotted coordinates, the same script resource can be used (over and over) in an infinite number of [different] ways, satisfying an infinite number of platforms and an infinite number of causalities (timelines). In the case of newly created shadows, pre-set routes double as record of old lives and blueprint for new lives. Thus, each shadow attempts to identically re-enact old lives (albeit with the objective of fixing issues or “doing it better next time round”). Naturally external parameters are invariable so different or heavily adjusted, each “new life” would not even vaguely compare to ones prior. Figurative “déjà vu” is the commonest parallel lives memory symptom. Another effect which confirms a shadow’s numerous incarnate “run throughs” is cumulative “instinct”. Contrary to popular belief, Instinct does not come naturally. It is the evolutionary response of many consecutive lives imprinted on hierarchical DNA.

For new lives to have any hope of matching the prior course, all (or the majority of) original connections would have to be in place. To a degree this is so, but definition will not favour the ardent egotistical materialist. Accountants would say all the pieces were actually in the wrong places, mixed up and “functionally defunct” (compared with originals). Yet, the truth is all the parts were in the precise places they needed to be for the new life to function optimally, even when the user’s survival duration was less than a minute. Existence accommodates limitless numbers of lives for innumerable purposes. Plausibly safe routes are present for those that choose to avail them. The quality of the stage we call death determines the speed of carnal transition. Peaceful deaths, such as “still birth”, would usually promote back-to-back lives (or instant reincarnation, though transference does not necessarily observe traditional linear definition). Traumatic or unfulfilled ends will naturally prolong transition. Certain individuals respond so badly to circumstances it is impossible to recirculate them. I hope the war machine feels warm about its unconscionable tyranny. How anyone can kill an unknown for the sake of “following orders” defies belief. But militant disrespect is not the only transgressor on that front. The deceitful “health” industry “helps” people die well before their time.

There are many different brands of “prophecy” and “prediction” aimed at courting the consensus view. Auspices such as conspiracy theories go some way to deflecting criticisms of mainstream inappropriateness, but balances that construe scales of political conduct are expansive. Of course political criticisms are almost always correct, but with such range much disagreeable dirt finds a way into the mainstream too, even if only for (as Jon Rappoport puts it) limited hangout. I have been particularly focusing on monstrous paedophilia in relation to these phenomena. Paedophilia itself is not “necessarily” monstrous, but maybe it is, depending on critical circumstances. What is undeniably evil about the theatricals that surround publicised [legally defined as] underage sex incidents is they reflect an accusatory court system that judges without being just.

The reason late Michael Jackson summonsed over a thousand (mostly perjuring) witnesses to defend him is he proved he was able to overwhelm the prosecution’s charge with counter accusations. To put things in perspective, a deceitful, lying Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) manipulated all mainstream Medias to conjure prejudice of the magnitude that they thought would be enough to “frame” their target, Michael Jackson. The net effect of this cooperative subterfuge appears to have been modelled on advice contained in Hitler’s Mein Kampf. “He’s guilty as sin no question about it, [give him the chair]” (as monotonous strangled exclaims) was repeated over and over like some tortured, hapless proverb. Jackson, fortunately in this instance, was as bright as he was recalcitrant. His familiar lyrical warble ever so gently persuaded “I am innocent because I’m pure”, but people struggled to believe it as he was given so little air time and the mainstream had been running their “whacko Jacko” side campaign geared to presenting him as “a nutcase” all the while. Those that listened really carefully to Jackson couldn’t have helped but picking up a hint of “you conceited, dishonest assholes” in the subliminal. We all know our government sponsored agencies are “beyond external criticism” so his fate was doubtlessly meant to be a “fait accompli”.

My last article dealt with the dynamics of child abuse (sic), but did not explain how it was possible to manufacture perjury more or less universally. Newspapers so regularly jump the gun on judgemental statement, people have become obliviously desensitised to their deceitful practices. When hundreds and hundreds of unrelated headlines deliver the same basic corrupt message over and over (Hitler’s Mein Kampf comes to the surface again), a cultivation of truth-of-sorts is brought into being. Deceitful corruption transforms into truth because no one challenges the singular original message (which is established through its repetition). This is partly because newspapers (all referring to near identical sources) create the illusion – the public voice. Thousands of newspapers can’t “all” be wrong, surely? As there is invariably a solitary fire source for each aggressively billowing smoke stack, “thousands” of reports in different newspapers in reality boil down to one voice, one view, one replicated propaganda pitch. Whilst it may be possible to launch private paedophilia prosecutions, every case publicised by Medias thus far (to my knowledge) has demonstrated evidence of responses to claims of injustice by the public “guardian”. Therefore, specific Media sources for all publicised paedophile arrests are provided by the Department of Public Prosecution or law enforcement agents acting on its behalf.

Under conditions of aggregated sanity, this obvious collusive brainwashing exercise would have been sprung before the ink had barely dried on the first tabloid release. Let us consider the ramifications of collective gutless social cowardice. How many law enforcers arrest paedophiles with view to prosecution on suspicion of innocence?

“Oh yes, we have to arrest a few innocents to prove “the [justice] system” is flawless”

I was being sarcastic here because the reverse is true of course and it is far worse than that when “justice” is factored into the equation. To the law enforcer a “paedophile” is only “alleged” prior to arrest. Once arrested, every suspect (sic) may as well plead guilty. The conspiracy here is newspapers only release the “view” [which I’m sure would equate to perjury in the “private sector”, by the way] of arbitrarily biased prosecutors and that almost always guarantees a winat court. It is no wonder the core message (in press releases) might as well read, “Why waste time and money on this trial?” Aside from the time poor reluctantly underpaid (why aren’t they allowed to claim lawyers or barristers’ rates?) jurors debacle, this fashion definitely looks back to those memorable “kangaroo courts” of the nineteenth century. Perhaps the plan is to ultimately bring back torture and confessions signed in blood.

Headlines are everywhere and these are designed to precipitate judgemental values that permeate the public mind.

Even close family members of an “accused” can be swayed into “believing” just as easily as the rest. He must have led a double life is the usual “excuse” granted. The scandal merchants have any and all melodramatic outcomes covered. Therefore when law enforcement, building “the case”, wants to beef up “witness” (sic) numbers, they have actually even managed to convince an accused’s own brother or sister to testify negatively with nothing more than accusatory hearsay providing “basis” for statements. Did Michael Jackson’s sister actually witness the star engaging in sex acts with minors? Of course she didn’t. She fell for all that mass Media bullshit after being egged on by the Department of Public Prosecution.

In Western nations, such as Australia, the Catholic Church is at the forefront of paedophilia allegations (remembering “allegation” is always mysteriously transformed into “certain guilt” of course). Records of incidents with forlorn priests are so voluminous; I am surprised Medias have managed to keep up with the pace. It may surprise Australians (in particular) all religions (well, except for a noteworthy Jewish “cult group” I shall focus on shortly) have been targeted, including Buddhism (to the Dalai Lama’s embarrassment). The real reasons for this scandalous deception may seem bizarrely conspiratorial but, against the background I present, not entirely farfetched. Whatever current opinions reign, duty to justice dictates religious cultures need to be reviewed from dual perspectives in light of mass Media stokingbefore any final judgements are made. The balanced investigator cannot rule out the magnetic effect of propagandas which has been proven so effective, over and over.

Whereas there is almost always no actual “evidence” supporting paedophile allegations and convictions are usually motivated by circumstantial witness “testimony” (“confession” or slanderous perjury?), adults with a genuine interest in “child sex” might plausibly seek likeminded friends. Where to “find” likeminded friends is the greatest challenge for any would-be paedophile, I would imagine. Thinking carefully along these lines, I did come up with some basis that might (and only “might”) give credence to devilish religious conspiracies of this genre. Though by conventional auspices serious contemplations would likely be too far adrift of cultural reason to disaffect “greater good” syndromes, public hysteria has shown itself to be both open to and humbled by extremely shallow arguments supporting the most unlikely of cabal concepts. For instance, if the researcher is willing to concede that rogue partnerships have been brokered with view to persuading mutual goals; with or without illicit connections, could these same like-minded associations be able to arrange prohibited liaisons?

Whether the “opinion” on the answer to that critical question is “yes” or “no”, religious institutions are viscerally bound to apply a duty of care to their congregations as each supposedly “acts for God” (conceptual greater good). Therefore the reality is that the church and other houses of worship are proved profoundly derelict of duty if just one allegation against them “takes hold”.

Under terms of worship, how is it possible for God “to err”?

The current state of affairs suggests administrative pressure for all religions is now in damage control aggravated by highly visible and seemed ceaseless spiteful propaganda barbs (that have prepared the floods of universally known past allegations of guilt). Therefore, would not the slightest rumour of paedophilia trigger internal raucous alarms within any spiritual organisation, even ones that are only borderline “religious”?

After hysterics dressed in the familiar mask of deceitful ignorance, known or faceless accusers, “guilty” accused and alleged victim(s) would come out of the woodwork, sometimes years after the fact (anything to ward off clarity), what would be bound to happen next?

Ultimately, any “bad” cleric would be sold up the river, of course.

Up to a certain point it would be in the best interest of the organisation under scrutiny to deal with everything internally in order to deflect negative publicity. However, when avalanches of complaints reach such frequencies as to become common public knowledge, reputation has already been long squandered. Under those special circumstances, “tarnished” institutions would have little to gain beyond doing everything in their power to suppress (which usually means eject without forethought) “bad eggs”. Indeed, by acting quickly in highlighting detractors, cutting red tape to ensure the expelling of alleged paedophiles is painless; some kudos might be given by the public at large. Press releases reporting that “order is not being interfered with and internal elitism has permitted routine justice” might actually be viewed as positive “PR” by targeted organisations. Any institution that complies would, at the very least, be seen to be acting in the “public interest” which, per manifestos, is also “in the interest of God”.

Let us say, for instance, there were rumours backing allegations, but nothing more. There were allegations without hard evidence. Could any religious institution in damage control ignore these and give an accused the “benefit of doubt”? It seems to me that in certain circumstances of shall we say “high security”; risk management significantly upgrades the chances of an accused’s presumed “guilt” pre-trial. How can the “certainly guilty” prove his innocence? How could the trial of a cleric sensationally rejected by his church be unbiasedly “fair”? Also people do lie, deceive and manipulate for a multitude of reasons. Fabrication of law enforcement evidence and biased judges is a popular theme used in police movies – the innocent man up against a corrupt machine. But what of those false claims of truth that were “believed” as though they were true?

How can fantasy that never was be “proven”?

Circumstances that did happen will hopefully leave a conspicuous evidence trail, but those that did not happen are guaranteed to leave no evidence trail. While beliefs are committed to duplicitous reasoning, fantasy is easy to upgrade and immortalise for it can neither be formally proven nor disproven. That is significantly why circumstantial evidence (evidence lacking hearsay such as reflective opinions) is used to formulate “basis” for verdict decision making to allow the promotion of fantasy (or something that did not happen) as reality (something that did happen). All of the “witnesses” at Michael Jackson’s “trial” offered circumstantial evidence (i.e. none offered hard evidence) whether acting for prosecution or defence.

I introduced “conspiracy theories” at the beginning of this article and now seems the right time to put that theme to the test. It has been noted (particularly in the alternative press) many times that where there are political conspiracies, the Jews are invariably never far away. Judaism, as with most other religions, is broken into (upwards of a hundred) different sects and this proffers the user base opportunities for considerable variance in doctrinal interpretations. Though invariably not “directly” concerning them, political conspiracies gravitate to favour Pharisee (a notable sect) involvement/implication when factoring in pre-emptive law making. Pharisaic tradition formats the script that makes all laws (certainly in “the West”) “viable”. These include horrendously unfair legislations that have been characterised to target religious practitioners of all persuasions in order to limit their involvement with (quite frankly) anything sexual (i.e. if the Pharisee adage “to lust after is to sin” is enough to permit unrequited draconian laws, presumably, as “God’s emissaries”, all fornicating priests are deemed to be “fair game” as potential targets).

Suffice to say, the Pharisees (and these guys are behind just about all those “prophesies” and “consensus” conventions “we” are obliged to follow) are subtly all over paedophilia. Paedophilia, of course, has a nasty habit of pissing off parents and making them “think” (sic) irrationally. It only needs a whiff of the word in family environments to fuse ugly breakouts of the poorest quality. Contemplate the power a “fringe religion” would hold over competitors if it could only harness inane populist ignorance. So following the track of general conspiracy theories and plausible revelations of outrageous duplicity in review of what mechanisms would be needed to be in place for effective infiltration of “enemies”, I considered whether this could be equally applied to the Pharisees, whether circumstantial allegations “in principle” might demonstrate limited credence against them as covert tyrannical ring leaders. Unlike hypotheticals monstrously resurrected to become “living satires” by our kangaroo courts, I make no prejudgement here.

Would it be possible, within the frame of this conceptualisation, for a Pharisee to pretend to be a Roman Catholic and win a diocese seat? Reviewing this consideration for a long while, I drew the unenviable conclusion, that it was not only possible but likely probable. Benjamin Disraeli affirmed that Jews deliberately married into aristocratic and royal families for “social position”. If a Pharisee can infiltrate a marriage, he can infiltrate a religion. In historic periods of persecution, high profile Jews have been recorded as having publically denounced their faith in favour of Roman Catholicism. Until Jesuit Martin Luther pinned his list of demands on the door of a chapel in Wittenberg, Germany in 1517, Catholicism’s “promissory penances” were very appealing to time poor Jewish merchants. Since the Nicolaitans’ (Pharisees) corruption sculpted what was to become new Gnosticism back in the fourth century, there has been bitter-sweet cooperation between the two faiths.

So, let us take the position that the Pharisees have infiltrated all religions, perhaps as part of their messianic “prison planet” (covert Zionism) strategy, what would they do once “in place”? Logic dictates they would try and influence how doctrines would be interpreted in order to found absolute bias towards their philosophies. How could this be executed? The answer is simple. Should various Pharisees be bestowed with clerical administrative roles devoted to scrutinising and assessing the philosophic worth of historic documents, then this would permit periodic “pushes” (perhaps aided by heavy bribes) gauged towards altering consensuses against traditional views and standards. Texts too outspoken for alteration that obstructed the “mission” might be deemed and argued as “spurious” (and thusly debatably unauthentic).

But what of outspoken individuals that won’t budge on “issues” that hinder the Pharisees’ operational synopsis?

How to dispel all those flies in the ointment with something that is guaranteed to work without “comeback”? It is worth noting here, in line with this “hypothetical”, logically all those religions the Pharisees have infiltrated are not friends collected in the spirit of fomenting mutual endeavours. They have all been deceived, defiled and, per identical reasoning, exist only to be tarnished (thou shalt not worship “false Gods”), as too (in some ways) are “rogue” (impure) sects of Judaism. For guarantees of no “comeback” against targeting mission obstructers there could never be any actual evidence. Everything would have to be fabricated (total bullshit) to assure opinions for were completely reliant on biased emotive circumstantial judgement. Perhaps “qualified” psychiatrists could validate repressed (i.e. non-existent) memories with the same sort of candor [used] when issuing prescriptive “medications” that induce psychosis. It would need false scandal after false scandal that instinctively “tweaked nerves”; some topic the public would be belligerent and stupid enough to believe in without reservation, something that might induce hysteria, if “generally” known. And there we have the hypothetical fire behind all the paedophilia scandals that afflict religious institutions across the globe, exceptI find no evidence of any arrests or convictions against Pharisees in relation to charges of religious paedophilia. Constructive feedback (with sources, please) on this is most welcome in comments.

For my hypothetical “master plan” to become reality, something else would need to happen for the operation to ooze credibility. Those with enough influence would have to arrange the “unthinkable”. Per normal administrative configurations (free of Pharisee infiltration), curates and vicars are “appointed” by religious institutions “in good faith”. This means someone or a committee of individuals must take responsibility for hiring (and firing). Therefore, musing over the fall of Jericho whilst outlining this reconstruction, all the Pharisees would need to do is to rig the recruitment process to ensure their (Passover style) chosen ones were in correct positions (so to speak) to permit operational success. It could also mean all sorts of nasties might be given responsible community roles, if that was the “ISIS style” objective. Imagine if the Pharisees had contacts in the prison system. Crime networks are other resource pools for undesirables. Would it be possible to not only hire strategic paedophile priests, but also throw in some extra shekels and promise of “protection” should any of the kids “blab”? At the correct juncture these priests would need to be sacrificed of course, but only long after the reasonable attitudes of congregations had been turned sourly toxic. The sourness would be for good reason. Traditionally, the most trusted member of any community was your priest. Were certain priests to turn into bare faced tyrants, God and faith are forlornly dishonoured.

Now it is important to cover the other side of the equation, the one most violets shrink from. The presumption that [per designation] “children” are not sexual, have no sexual needs and can be only corrupted (by “adults”) towards defilation is sheer bunk. When the law of the land stated that sexual consent between adults from age sixteen and above was natural and healthy, there was no rebellion against the “heinous” doctrine. In years gone by when the age of consent was considerably lower, maidens of all persuasions at age twelve saw great value in seeking to enter into matrimonial sexual alliances. One can only presume that prior to the implementation of legal frameworks, the only age barriers that inhibited sexual unions were the results of “family measures”. I would be willing to bet all the tea in China that if our current narcissistic consent legislations were repealed tomorrow, the “young” would “miraculously” find their sexuality again.

Masturbation is the best evidence for sexual drive and this unfortunately (to the monumental displeasure of sexual puritans) kicks in at very young ages. A phenomenon near exclusively confined to girls is the sexual “phase” I call “open” or “public” masturbation. Upwards of age six, females (in particular) demonstrate a desire to socially connect sexually. Conversely, ironically, young men prefer private masturbation (even when in groups). The Pharisees’ zeal knows no bounds. I have introduced the Puritan offshoot called Baptism before. According to Baptists, masturbation is a sin. Ambiguous in Catholicism, the heavy weight towards sexual procreation might encourage extremist views that also target and punish “self-sex”. Biased, fanatical opinions have been behind the attack on all forms of sexual expression in various Media formats. Obsessive hatred is so great towards the genre typically labelled “child pornography” anything bordering on lewd conduct has been framed and outlawed. People were not ever given the “choice”. There was no responsible debate and legislations have been reflectively austere.

Medias depicting children (as termed) masturbating are outlawed too. In fact, naked children in deemed to be “sexual poses” may also be “classified” as pornographic. Now, I can’t understand the logic underpinning the legislation of this genre. For a pose to be “sexual” it must legitimately arouse the viewer. Is the great body of Pharisaic elders exempt from judgement against their prohibited arousal? All jurors must scrutinise material evidence to form opinions, guided by legal professionals, of course. Child pornographic slides (when no sexual act can be identified) must cause sexual arousal to meet classification leaving only one question. Are “infected” prosecutors and jurors that have been aroused by child pornography safe to circulate socially and exempt from prosecution as “clinical” paedophiles? Pharisaic elders that appraise content to be sexual must surely also take some responsibility for judgement here. Though they were not directly exposed to sexual materials, and unless their laws are fraudulent, if they had been exposed they presumably could be aroused. This implies that they are classifiable as “clinical” paedophiles as well.

I gave the example of the body being a pyramidal structure below the mind earlier. Well, according to materialists this is not so (confirming why fanatical materialism is the utopian science-standard and Pharisees’ choice). The mind (per that insistence) is only a function of the “fully grown” body. Prior to reaching proscribed maturity, per this gobbledegook, bodies either have no or “swayable” (developing) thinking minds (except when this obstructs “the agenda” – Jon Rappoport again). Conveniently, maturity kicks in precisely when law making moguls dictate measures. Therefore, if they were to say “maturity begins at age fifty”, then forty nine year olds would be “deemed” unable to make “informed decisions”. That means, of course, that victims of paedophilia are not only unable to legally consent to sex, they also cannot make any formal sexual decisions. How many articles promoting sentiment of “caring” paedophiles and their willing victims have been given primetime visibility by the mainstream (or alternative)? According to my research it has been a very long time since any visibility has been offered. Propaganda networks are only interesting in furthering their own agendas to the detriment of anyone that stands in their way.

Was Michael Jackson’s prosecutionthat never happened as described? In the way proceedings were “framed”, his alleged gift of $25 million to the guardian of a twelve year old boy was enough to underscore “guilt of sexual misconduct” for the gossip vultures, but was their conviction just? This goes far farther than merely highlighting the potential for blackmail. It demonstrates the potential gulf between effective truth, secular opinions on historic events and how “worldly” promotional materials cultivate accountability (or not). For instance, were we to presume that Michael Jackson truly did engage in sexual acts with the young “poster” boy in the spotlight, the only decent question that deserves righteous scrutiny is, “did the child consent or was he violated?”

“The consensual child”, the Pharisees quip, “how is that possible?”

In my last article, I referenced examples of various child prodigies as evidence towards my attempt to demonstrate how much diverse talent can be found every human pursuit. This in consideration, why would there not be sexual prodigies too? The preposterous superstition that posits all designate children as asexual could be easily undone with genuine committed research. Common amongst seventeenth and eighteenth century seafaring accounts are tales of sordid sexual escapades where age seems to offer no barrier. One notable volume details mariners’ activities while visiting Polynesian Islands. Texts report that women (regularly accompanied by siblings upwards of age eight years old) would swim to visiting ships offering those on board welcome and sex. According to the same reports, the young women sexually matched their seniors in every respect. If one was to presume current age of consent laws are “divine”, would not this espouse that the majority of pre-Victorian era householders were systemic abusers? Prior to British William Gladstone’s 1870’s legislations, the age of consent was twelve years (complimenting the Roman philosophy on sexual maturity) and this ensured the majority of thirteen to fifteen years old women (per that classification) would marry to begin the arduous task of producing family heirs. At the time, childbirth was seen as a risky pursuit for women by their twenties so young plebeian marriages were encouraged.

Was the Victorian era we have as a legacy never to have happened (erasing William Gladstone’s sensationally degrading age legislation); Roman standards would likely be in place today (presuming no other vile avenues had disrupted the status quo). Though standards do not precisely match natural sexual reproductive maturity, the Roman opinion is far closer to it than the “eighteen rule” that oppresses current Western populations. Therefore one wonders if, just as homosexuals were vilified by rainbow movements that turned prior legal morality on its head, whether marginalised adult “minors” will seek aggravated revenge against the “system” at some time in the future. Could the young sue a system that stole their divine sovereign right to be sexual and reproduce? Awkward questions are always the best questions for they prophesise the path to sacred truth.

Continuing along this line of thinking regards repressed adult minors; correct contemplations will surely determine the problem is much greater than on “face value”. Taking the bull by the horns as it were, how would today’s determined-to-be sexual young find partners amongst indoctrinated “legal” adults? Would not the young that are in need of sex ultimately have to seek out paedophiles for their satisfaction? Were that uncomfortable symbiosis to be true, then clearly reason has been traded for vanity. It would make sense, because all “moralities” are forms of vanity. In light of this, when prophecy and associated predictions do little more than feed propagandists directives refined to permit universalisation of consensus view in their image, false Gods will reign over mankind. That is why below our modern day false Gods, spirits are invalids and souls may as well prostrate as lambs willing for sacrifice.

Preconditioning through the synthesis of deceiving divine values afflicts the social organ called “humanity” in its entirety. Every human being is infected and diseased in some way. Material symptoms most noticeably grant credentialed influencers (hawks and vultures by reasoned determination) the use of “devices” as lures for parasites (willing lambs for slaughter). Terms of standards that prevail are so arbitrary they cease to be relevant. The mantra of those that control is simple and effective “if we desire it, it is possible and therefore it will be”. Conquering natural sexuality has been their great prize; because once sex ownership is secured (perverted) life potence becomes suppressed to surrender point (i.e. master/slave catalyst). Surrender has meant that individuals “without visceral power” presumably have less prestige than programmable robots. I estimate fewer than ten per cent of “able bodied” society is actually needed for corporate commerce purposes. Indeed, with open minded unbridled investment into technologies, that estimation of labour requirement could be significantly reduced.

What we have is a situation whereby mainstream Medias have been able procrastinate well enough and consistently enough for “the masses” to believe there is an indefinite and constant labour shortage “somewhere”, “anywhere”. Enterprisingly, governments (for their part in this tryst) exist to concoct pointless ways of occupying the time of their enslaved chattel, perhaps to ward off popular rebellion, but mostly to show they are in control. Fiscal competition was never healthy or necessary if honest, socially serving government is to be given a chance at leadership. The universal Westminster System would not tolerate the notion. And it is a shame because it would make the world a better place for everyone, elites included. How about starting by investigating the potentially magical qualities of communal man? How about, instead of obsessively shutting out “unsanitary” potential, all doors to new avenues and abilities were opened wide with hendonistic gusto?

For obvious reasons (such as the attack on life potence), I have been focusing on sexuality. Gratuitous sex it could be argued is an art form, but it is not the only one. There are many other art forms (including war, when conveyance is correctly dedicated), far too numerous to list. Given the oversupply of labour for worthy industrial projects, why not test wider society’s devotion to craft? It seems to me the majority would be best put to use towards the overall entertainment of others, whether that is for “the few” or “multitudes”. Those that are able to craft would simply need to find natural vehicles for ambitions. Securing the correct preoccupation should be the role of any external social management mechanism (such as government). Instead, forcing “square pegs in round holes” “careers” on hapless conscripts has been proven to be neither constructive nor aptly overwhelmingly productive. How many wasted lives have supported the accountancy profession?

Perhaps I am being harsh on accountants here, but their negative outlook presupposes a limitless money supply would promote a guaranteed epidemic of laziness. Yet there is no reason hindering constant resources promoting limitless floods of cultural excellence. We can see evidence of the spontaneously effective outcomes of abundance in nature. There is also a deeper, natural reason why governments and their puppet masters would be wise not to continue their nihilist course devoted mostly to squandering abject lives for their “power highs”. Every human body (let us not forget) will double as uncontrolled (innocent) spirit and evolved (but not always wise) soul for the duration of the life term. For any cosmic improvement to manifest there must be sufficient recapitulation between old and new lives for trends to “bite”. When societal rules become too austere, past identities also risk becoming obsolete. Under those terms the existence model is rendered “futile” and this precedes grave danger. Should trends persist, the great “almighty” God is left with one humble option. It happened before and the event left an indelible mark last time round. Scientists label it “Big Bang” (there may have been numbers of these cosmic purges since existence began).

In so many ways my life serves as the testament to how “they” destroy prodigy. At age three or four, I was determined to become a concert pianist. My parents weren’t rich and were not prepared to spend money on a “useless” piano. My mother wanted me to become an accountant or a scientist, something “career worthy”, something “professional”. She did eventually succumb to my whining. At age nine I was given a piano by a boogie-woogie pianist who was a family friend. The problem was many of the notes did not function, including middle C, the F below, Bb above and much of the upper and lower registry also didn’t work. Accompanying lessons followed but how could I “fire” under those conditions? With poor note recall memory and imperfect pitch, I was never destined to be another Martha Argerich, Vladimir Horowitz or even Liberace (all Pleiadians, ironically?). But I did have something to give. I did have something in me that needed to be fulfilled and if the “system” was honest and sane, it would have engaged my fulfilment. Instead only my determination and dedicated belligerence “against all odds” ensured I found my way (Yes I am performing Beethoven’s Appassionata here) as a professional sounding amateur.

In summary, materialists use manmade terms to describe objects they don’t truly understand. They cast perspectives in what they generally suppose is “the human way” (when not in “conspiracy mode”). Science “proves” acknowledgement of symptoms and the use of system satisfying devices has replaced the void once occupied by prophets that uttered proverbial predictions. Either courted and contained consensus view in order to control and direct populism. Their ultimate goal is what’s more or less in place today: preconditioned, spiritless bodies in denial of birth right and unaware of soul purpose. The only “way out” is for mankind to learn to commune. Only then can humanity become “one race” (as it were) with divine intention to live the expressive power of corporeal God (Tamarian).

Imagine, if you will, there existed a world populated only by biological automatons that were solely allowed to survive at the behest of a vague commercial bureaucracy. Because of this uncertainty, imagine if none of these automatons realised they were abject properties of a brutal federal control program. If the slave masters, the “authorities”, decided they desired to stamp their immense power over will, to “once and for all” demonstrate their authority over the slave classes, could they outlaw or remove all fluid or solid sustenance resources without losing or graphically impairing their prized stock? Could they make the air unfit for consumption or destroy all known shelter to stress their despotic ambition? No, the only the true liberty they could possibly take away without permanently impairing labour is “unnecessary” sexuality. That world does exist. It is planet Earth and the ignorant, naive biological automatons are human slaves; fodders dedicated for a system that deliberately transcends spiritual logic and reason in order to complete and maintain its program,

By corporate commercial determination, per “the program”, paedophilia is the root of all evil, and for reasons that so firmly contradict erudite populism, truth has become obsolete. The term paedophilia itself is nonsensical was it not for the fact that just about everyone has been radicalised into believing trappings of propaganda. So, going back to basics, it would be correct to start by analysing authentic etymology of terms in order to corroborate any coherent meanings. Only by careful analysis of the cold, dry facts can sound “basis” encapsulating the mainstreamers’ obtuse view be deciphered.

Paedophilia is a combination of two Greek words. One (paidos) means child and this is topically self-explanatory. The other, philos, calculates rather more problematic interpretation. Yes it translates to mean “love” as would be expected within the cognitive frame of child love. Nevertheless, the Greeks had three words (eros, agape and philos) to represent the emotion. Eros is used to convey an earthy erotic, sexual passion or lust. Agape is an emotional spiritual bond that perhaps might signify symptoms such as pity, togetherness or other deep soul connections (shall we say). Philos proposes a brave new world, one that is generally estranged from the Western concept of love. It is the Greeks’ “intellectual love” evocation and this might be best appraised as “to be on the same wavelength” (with others). Respect of a peer would make an acceptable version of the same concept.

Therefore paedophilia literally means “respect for children”, so how on earth did it translate into the ugly mess that has embraced the greatest of all modern day hysterias?

It seems likely (though I find no evidence of historic accountability) that the term was originally sponsored by those that formed special liaisons with children. It was a way of justifying engagements that might have otherwise been frowned upon by wider society. Promiscuity is a revelation of modern times, awoken by the 1960’s flower power sexual revolution. Prior to that lust outside marriage was a profound negative and “age restriction” on unions had been superficially imposed by religious authorities for so long that physical adult child pairings would have seemed unconscionable. This is not to say rules were not broken behind closed doors. Suffice to say, prior to the 1960’s suspicious borderline adult relationships would have had to have been considered lust free but always either plausibly “working towards marriage” or “undeniably platonic” for seemly social tolerance.

It was only after sexual revolution, political authority saw value in promoting homosexuality as a crass attempt to pervertall sexual relationships (i.e. by reversing principled traditionalism that defines sexual intercourse as a procreation precaution and not as a recreational tool, cultural insanity was born. Of course, this merely acts as a stepping stone towards outright control of the human mind – “you will behave as we say anytime we lecture you”). Thus those rabid synthesised outcries at phantom paedophilia are backed off strategized and scoped political support aimed at positively acceleratinghomosexual causes. “Contradictory” pederasty was most recently (1600’s onwards) adopted by the French (pederastie) from the Latin paederastia (Greek – paiderastia) and popularly translates to mean “lover of boys”.

Remarkable French piano prodigy and composer Camille Saint-Saens, a covert gay of the high Victorian period, once famously reported, “I am not a homosexual. I am a pederast”. This ironically demonstrates how much values have changed. Homosexuality was stigmatised because it was deeply hated (though undoubtedly egged on by political shit-stirrers) throughout cosmopolitan society and, therefore, illegal. Underage sex was not illegal, but because sex outside marriage was so universally chastised, “decent” normal folks would have found the practice unthinkable.

Even so Saint-Saens innocently reveals evidence of two streams of social conditioning. To admit to have been homosexual would have enraged retribution to beyond the pale so it was denied. Yet to confirm his overt but ambiguous paedophilia was the best way of diffusing allegations against him and shutting up critics. Of course there is much more to this tale (which circulated around his regular trips to Algeria – a place renowned for egregious sexual tolerance at the time). Saint-Saens cast himself as the paternal spirit ever excited by the ambitions of youthful innocent exuberance and not as a lecherous molester of children.

Ancient sexual roots of pederasty were neither explored nor acknowledged as relationships were symbolised as paternally platonic per the cultural view. However, the stem “erasty” is a version of erasthai (Latin) for which eros (Greek sexual love) is a derivative. This should emphasise the nonsense of modern times’ furore. If sex between adults and children was to be intimated by a slur, then pederasty is the ideal term. In fact, though it is believed to have originally been used to describe adult/minor homosexual trysts, the etymology is actually formally gender neutral. Does the “substitution” of paedophilia (in place of pederasty) not aptly highlight the wilful arrogance/ignorance of mainstreamers?

Many well founded information sources have come to light that broach the rather obvious homosexual connection to global control networks after Gary Allen’s tantalising volume “None Dare Call It Conspiracy” was published in 1972 (only a year before the Trilateral Commission was formed by late David Rockefeller). Those behind the eugenics movement aiming to radically reduce global populations have been implicated as players in the “program” many times. Whether this is true or not is open to debate, but philosophic motives are beyond argument.

If all population units were strictly homosexual, then procreation would require external management, perhaps offering theoretical provisos such as medical intervention tosave humankind. Youngermore fertile parents produce stronger offspring that live longer and this corroborates (though statistics are “contradictory”) a matched conspiracy. Paedophilia (younger, more fertile) has been outlawed whereas homosexuality (guaranteed infertile) is now both legal and encouraged (with initiatives such as sex change development offered to “asexual” [sic] children as young as four years old). Clearly all measures improve the ongoing population control/reduction agenda. I should add that whereas some institutionalised heterosexuals may argue they have a right to abolish repulsive homosexual practices, any [evenjustifiable] overt or covert despotism still prepares undeniable infringements against sovereign liberties.

Eugenics’ attack on the people has been unyielding. Wars used to be the preferred vehicle. Yet, as I write, the American “health system” (for instance) debatably shows up ten to a hundred times more effective at disposing of populations than war, depending on which statistics are favoured. Several drugs (including dozens of branded opiates) administered under the banner of “healthcare” are known to kill or impair life. The best reference is “auto-immune deficiency” so-called AIDS. Harmless retrovirus HIV was blamed for [known] effects caused by previously shelved (1950’s) chemo drug AZT. Naturally symptoms have been by no means limited to HIV “sufferers”. Timothy McVeigh’s foolhardy quest to bring down a building in Oklahoma City in 1995 was masterminded by the same powers he was attacking in defence of the “program”. They were behind the (at least) 50,000 AIDS related deaths of First Gulf “War” veterans. Ignorant conscripts were killed by their supposedly “protective” medications.

To be honest I believe the 1960’s flower power movement was a corporate inspiration too. Either that or corporates rode the coattails of the general erosion of faith in traditionalism (also a reaction to the distrust that blew over into anti-war mass desertions from Vietnam?). When did “the people” ever make any sincere [group] initiatives for themselves? I believe the powers wanted to introduce contraception universally. By that token, temporarily encouraging promiscuity was the only rational lever against the [Catholic] Church. Even so, to this day Catholicism has not bowed to Zionism on that level. The sexual revolution was predictably short lived. Prominent film stars, HIV and AIDS put a huge damper on any free thinking after the 1980’s.

It is interesting that Oklahoma and Waco (which set the precedent for legitimised “law enforcement” murder of any American citizen) saved [then President] Clinton’s bacon. It shows me “the people” have no say or formal influence on what is “in the interest” of “wider society”. That is the “programmers’” exclusive right. A good example of elite manipulation of public opinion can be seen in analysis of the (ridiculous) “gay plague” branding campaign. Whereas an overburden of industrial pollution and chemical pesticides “caused” HIV in Africa, there has been barely a mention of it anywhere, ever. I shall focus on “Big Oil” in a future article provisionally titled “Coming Clean on Cancer”. To resoundingly dampen the free love heyday, throughout the early 1990’s British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher ran regular government sponsored television adverts that symbolised promiscuous sex as guaranteeing participants’ “horrible deaths”. Presumably similar libellous techniques were used in other corners of the first world.

I haven’t personally referenced Jon Rappoport’s “AIDS Inc.” (1988) but I feel sure he will have delivered correct conclusions after reviewing his various websites. Paedophilia is also nothing short of a stagnant political move as are all other trappings designed to bolster the Eugenic movement’s determination to deny life. Forget the hotbed “abortion”. From the lofty position of purity, is not contraception the undeniable attempted murder of an unborn child? Given their Zionist-Bolshevik tactics, I would be very surprised if the visceral anti-abortion lobby is not another face of the same arbitrary plutocracy. When “they” decide they need to repopulate, anti-abortion will become the new flavour of the month. Currently abortion is a decoy that removes the sting from contraception.

Those demonstrably anti-paedophilia have been set up, applied more or less zero attention to the real issues. The shambles that is “organised” (a splintered, refracted mess) society is our testament. Rationalist Eckhart Tolle makes a surprising amount of sense in his claim that classical crusaders crusade merely for empowerment of their egos. I extend that philosophy somewhat and emphasise the bigger and more divisive the “cause” (sic), the greater the “individual” empowerment. There is no bigger cause than paedophilia currently. It is the mother of all causes today. Protesters, critics and complainers keep well clear of truth in order to preserve their egos. Maintaining the fantastical narrative line in deference to truth is the objective goal. Besides, if their “big issue” was to evaporate indefinitely, aimless lives would have nothing to bolster egos. Political spin, intricate make-believe dressed as truth has avowed the horrible “standards” that have cultured public infatuation.

Because the cultivation of biological automatons is the brainchild of the “program’s” covert marketing arm, Zionism (symbolising prison planet), there is almost absolute topical congruity between the mainstream and “alternative” press instruments. Alternatives also weave their own brands of make-believe and encourage that most foul of whimsical, plausible denials’ – “who to believe?” Indeed, as most independent or third party writers and journalists are incapable of doing much more than parroting or reacting against information issued by mainstream/alternative “authorities”, sanity has become wedged somewhere between a rock and a place beyond vital imagination. Even the great Jon Rappoport hasn’t ever dared offer paedophilia a fair birth from what I have read. Only an extraordinary journalistic genius with a death wish could and would religiously tackle this subject with unbiased sincerity. Like homosexuality in its wake, paedophilia now humbles the zealous.

Arguably everything political began with the collapse of Atlantis. After the Pharisees (the theoretical Atlantis “derelicts” Nicolai Levashov mentions in his illuminating book “Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors”) conquered relative druidism 3,000 years ago, a globalist agenda has followed the uniform path towards the “program’s” unilateral attempt aimed at shaping all other creeds and cultures in its image. Permitting only Puritan adjusted worship is one of the many small steps aimed to configure that grand design. Sharia Law (a cauldron of intolerance; banning all manners of sexual expressions), incidentally, few seem to real realise, is iconic Zionist Law.

Political charades “for order” are exploited by puppeteers that use militant groups (deliberately formed for such purposes) such as “ISIS” and “Al Qaeda” to instil fear. Labelling of designate “children” (with 21 desired as the ideal age barrier) and applied sexual prohibition has been a long standing goal that heralds back to the Victorian era (and presumably prior). In some ways it surprises me that Gladstone did not realise the utopian objective back in the nineteenth century. Although with infant mortality prevalent and the need for fodder for wars to once and for all break the opposition in his time, outcomes and their contingencies have been predictableto say the least.

Maybe it was last year or perhaps the year before when I noticed a mainstream headline that poked me in the eye. It was significant enough to spur me to remove MSM as my default webpage. The article in question presented one of America’s provincial sheriffs’ who was voicing implausible concerns over a child rape trial. The “child”, at the time, had been seventeen years old. Two days before her eighteenth birthday, she had allegedly voluntarily engaged in penetrative sexual intercourse (statutory “rape”) with her [then] boyfriend. Only in America could a “trial” like that be “taken seriously”. But it does highlight the fact that the “program’s” zeal is all about fanatically vigilant oppressive power of order, bereft of sane judgement. Australia (where I live currently) handles these matters differently.

Over a decade ago a mature looking twelve year old, blonde haired girl produced a bouncing heir with her [also] underage boyfriend (if memory serves me right, he was fifteen). The sensational TV show “Current Affair” was all over the news like a baby’s rash. They “named and shamed” everyone they could collect until everyone associated turned bright purple and frothed at the mouth. Nothing was done about the couple because nothing could be done so, after the furore, everyone politely looked the way, except there was a sequel. The hapless girl dared produce a second sprog at age sixteen by the same father (this time presumably of father worthy age). Sacra-bleu!!!!! I hope the TV show paid her well. She deserved every cent. He was almost certainly jailed for twenty years or more.

One could look back at the collapse of craft industries in favour of industrial commercialism as the beginning of the withering of independent mind [that worked off trial and error and, ultimately, questioned everything]. In the eighteen and nineteenth centuries there were occasional challengers. Disparate groups, such as the Luddites, did attempt to block imperial progress. Interestingly, prior to “industrialisation”, learning centres were almost exclusively used to prepare society’s elite classes. In fact, going much further back, I would argue it was only after the abolition of the mystery schools (run by the druids) in the Dark Ages that saw the shift from education to processed dogma learnt by rote as the staple for mainstream education.

Even those that complete a Master’s Degree today are given no marks for personal input beyond how it satisfies comprehension of “evidence”) (i.e. synthesised “worthy” information that has been rubber stamped by “credentialed” proscribed agents of globalism under the thumb). To which end eventually none dare question established “rules” which are actually beyond question. It is also duly noted that the precise same strategy has been used by political proponents that word laws governing paedophilia in ways to ensure any possible “right minded” intellectual protagonist’s challenge would be judged as spitefully ambiguous (at best). I find no evidence supporting rationale behind our current childhood threshold and can but assume the demonstrablybaseless “18” figure was pulled out of thin air at the whim of some starched bureaucrat or other. Globalist hacks have been running “Holocaust style” attack campaigns against anyone that dare test viability ever since.

It was not that long ago when the age of [marital] consent was “12” (following ancient Roman tradition) in some US states and the European nation of Holland. America may be recognised as the modern day super power, but originally it was founded and developed as a formidable expansion of the Union of Jacob (or Great Britain), so the history of English law making plays extreme relevance to this debate. There was no legal age of consent until one of the British Middle Ages Kings decided to impose boundaries through fear that there would be no under limit to matrimonial alliances (or presumed sexual liaisons) with maidens. I am deliberately foggy on “which king” it was because I would like it to be Norman Jew William the Conqueror (who ushered in a “new age of [cloaked] Zionism”) as it does fit well with my overall patter. So if he’s the one, top marks for me.

Either way, for the best part of a millennium “the people” and their ruling powers had no objection to marital unions between de facto “adults” from age twelve. It was a king (the “contemporary” power) who had instigated radical new restrictions (be it conceived from ancient foundations) which also implies some marriages (prior to law) were made between parties (maidens specifically) aged less than twelve years. One would imagine that a small popular core would have always been against “young” marriages, whereas the majority must have been easy with whatever was the conventional norm. The perennial remainder (probably an equally distinct minority) are traditionally mostly shown as bloated cadaverous sorely vocal antagonists destined to bluster at first sight of illuminated “reasoning” by compilers of historic propagandas. Those that covet callous restrictions will do anything to preserve them.

In medieval times (as emphasised earlier) the age of consent strictly concerned marriage but did not place any focus on sexual activities outside matrimony. That was left to religion. Western religion is an adaptation of Roman paganism. Therefore when Christianity sprouted from the burning embers of Gnosticism, naturally austere (Pharisee promoted) rules were applied to marriages which ideally revered all lustful and licentious behaviours as “ungodly”. A functional allowance was made for purposes of procreation. Per this fashion, an adaptation of orthodox Jewish attire, the Christian bridal gown, attempted to limit “lustful” sexual intercourse between marital partners. Even so, for a great period (can anyone say with “authority” how long?) the proverbial line was drawn at age “12”.

So how has this ongoing “con operation” been run in a way to successfully beguile the madding masses? Today’s mental health institutions and asylums for the insane provide glimmers of insight. I determine that the profession’s handbook outlining three hundred or so “behavioural conditions” is simply an expansion of crass religious judgement as to what it is to be “good” or “evil”. Jon Rappoport regularly advises all behaviours classed as varied evidence of insanity are equally symptoms of normal behaviour. Evil (as termed) actions therefore are now indefinitely branded as manifest insanity. Modern society runs on adapted rules that are designed to obfuscate the truth, so while one could argue we are either “more” or “less” free than before, in principal only “terminologies” have changed and not the convictions that delivered them.

When the world was conquered in the 1650’s (capitalising on discoveries such as the United States of America), there was an uncomfortable transition from royal to civilian government power. The full changeover took about 300 years and today no royal wields any visible power. It was only after civilian government was firmly rooted that perceived social issues were targeted by the pariahs of control to facilitate their utopian dream agenda. Of course, the ideal policy (as far as they are concerned) is always eradication, but when (as is so often true) extreme measures fail, soft humanitarian ploys are stealthily drafted. Similar to current workings of political/legal administration, reasons behind tortured virtue offered as “grounds” rarely (if ever) matched true objectives behind schemes unveiled as “value solutions”.

High Victorian British politics eventually found a Prime Minister with the right measure of zealous hatred to tackle youth sex head on with a proverbial sledge hammer. Himself a reputed brothel crawler (and paedophile), William Gladstone first increased the age of consent to “15” in 1875. So foul was his hatred it inspired infection and; consequentially, he succeeded in raising “the bar” again to “16” by 1878. This did nothing to inhibit intimate relations with children, as evidenced in outpourings of diatribe over the plight of a pregnant provincial London prostitute aged ten in the early 1900’s. Whether the girl was anything more than a figment of the imagination remains to be proven. There are numerous other period artistic writings that might be sourced to highlight identical topical content.

Logic underpinning Gladstone’s reasoning behind the marital age of consent increases was null and void, more or less precisely equating to William the Conqueror’s war spoil “logic”. Age fifteen, and then sixteen, was simply deemed “young enough”. No science or consideration to individuals’ right to choose was applied or contemplated. Each was a corporate edict for the nonsense that is proscribed as the “greater good”. The same lack of basis was approximated in 2001 when Great Britain almost paved the way to the “program’s” supreme goal “21”. If legislation for the age of consent (now beyond marriage, of course) set at twenty one had passed, the rest of the world (an extension of Great Britain) would have been doomed to follow, eventually. In other words, legislations are arbitrary measures. Construction of a “group identity” model permitting only standardised values and behaviours for standardisation’s sake is the selfish result. Given the raft of evidence, even a slothful fool should determine this always has been (albeit in varied forms) the plan; though few “in power” would dare agree or admit to their repugnant deceitfulness.

The reason the powers have dimly promoted their numerous nurturing society “concepts” (even though society does anything but nurture) is messages are designed to make the opposite of truth “appear” truthful. In fact categorisation/classification of [designate] children supports a global social enslavement program (one of numbers of cultural adjustment frameworks that are currently processed simultaneously and connected via the World Wide Web and other international exchanges). In effect, each synthesised cycle is designed to break children into new gormless adult slaves as asset-worthy (“useful”) fodder to man the system. Per this design, children are instructed fantasy is more plausible than truth, though (thankfully) not every teacher plays dumb.

Nevertheless, those that deceive and act spitefully are rewarded for personal dishonour. That’s the “program” for all society; all societies. Scripted reality versions profit from denying conscience, of course, so true spirituality must be forbidden at all cost regardless of cultural persuasion. Frankly, this in consideration, it is impossible to function in society today without being unfaithful. Ancient, traditional rites of passage have gradually been replaced with risk/reward (I’ll call them) “holographs” supplied by the “goggle box” and other mechanisms of influence. Sexuality is now almost universally framed as something “obviously” (sic) illicit. Thus, most things sexual might arguably judgmentally parry with actions like smoking and the consumption of drugs/alcohol. For the young, relationships have been reduced to “intrigue” which opens the door to cruel, vindictive power plays. Consideration of blackmail as the first option in negotiation persists into adulthood.

Individuals (making up the majority) that are determined to be law abiding (patriotic) become effective prisoners in their own open society. Sexual repression invariably leads to differing communication problems between sexes and, to a certain degree, estranges relations. The miraculous presupposed instant transition from impertinent scripted childhood to “proficient” adulthood does not prepare the way for pretty society. Each new insolent, spoilt, self-centred, experience lacking generation of “adults” attempts to crudely push its way up the queue. Many have predictably abused their supposed “right” to say no and have been conditioned into thinking any (and all) natural sexual acts are “theoretical” forms of rape. Few adults will contend there are only determinations to be and no “rights” at all (a fact the “program” callously capitalises on).

Culturally male/female roles/mindsets have not kept pace with everything else that has been going on in the background (i.e. systemic shredding of individualistic natural sexual dignity). One consequence is men and women are still destined for classical marital unions (even if not in name). Men, per this profile, mustseek sexual gratification and women shouldprovide the opportunity (i.e. male hunters, female prey). However, because women now collaterally (i.e. “the great group”) envisage all sex acts as “potential” forms of rape, they have been given an enormous degrading power.

In their administrative capacity, they can permit undignified sexual acts with whomever they choose, when legitimate and “legal”. Downgraded social ethics have had the effect of dragging all women down to the realms of whoredom (or celibacy for dissenters). Any whore’s power is her “right” to administer sex “favours”. “Program” masters know this full well. Their “combobulation” child exploitation takes whoredom away from the spotlight. Thus, the modern day whore cannot traffic (an exploit variant) him or herself. He or she must traffic another or others. Prostitution, from the time it was labelled “the oldest profession”, has been effervescently legitimised. “Populist” anger has specifically shifted from attacking prostitution in general to the [predominantly phantom] child sex industry. This is not to say “decent society” is comfortable with prostitution, but affairs of the flesh do not antagonise in the way they used to.

Physiologically, the only morally valid justifications behind any prohibitions of sexual acts might be on grounds of “lack of fertility” or body “immaturity” (which would provide basis for the mother of debates if tackled sincerely). Those proven unfertile could be justifiably deemed sexually unaccountable and, providing “procreation” was seen as the only functional benchmark for that type of communication, it could be outlawed to satisfy the requirements range outlined. There is actually quite a big degree of variance in apt statistical data on this arena. The youngest “woman” (on record) ever to birth a child was aged six. Women, in general, may begin their menstrual cycles from about age nine. Men are late risers with the ability to ejaculate prevalent usually from about age thirteen. The youngest father (for my research) is listed as aged eleven.

According to “nature” (reflective of God), a sexual metamorphosis demonstrably takes place in women at age nine and men of age thirteen. Thus, an uncomfortable surplus of wilderness years in respect of current legal accountability should be duly noted. Wilderness years, in the case of women, number nine. For men there are five years. How is this legal accountability in any way, shape or form naturally legitimate? By the time an average woman turns eighteen half her life has been sexual. God’s blessing has been terrorised and abused by society’s ignorance and abject subservience to the “program”. Terrorist peers foist the consequences of their foul laws on the trembling masses producing barely a shudder of dissent. Yet all should be acutely aware that these measures are designed purely to degrade the majesty of sexual intercourse to further scope for the production of “efficient” human “automatons”. Killing off stagnant populations is a fringe benefit.

When a woman turns eighteen, psychologically, nothing changes. Her mindset is still the same as it was before. She had been sexual but to be sexual was to “sin” (a pharisaic Judaic preconception) and this was “forbidden” (fruit). She was sexual but, as nothing has actually changed,to be sexual now IS to “sin”. There is one difference and it’s a big one. It is the power of control. Before she could illegitimately offer sexual consent or forbidden fruit (opening the door to all sorts of nasty blackmail scenarios) and now she can legitimately grant sexual consent as the fruit is ripe (opening the door to all sorts of nasty “double standards”). This is how sexual women have been reduced to whoredom.

Men have paid the price too. The perverse game we call politics impinges on all male values. Those that are not avowed celibates are rapists-in-waiting. Under foul terms as these, any man that dares to succumb to sexual urges can and will be accused of theoretical rape. This is all courtesy of modern social-conditioning mechanisms geared to elevating fantasy. The average woman now believes she always has the “right” to determine which “rapes” are permissible. She can also change her mind. That is the modern woman’s “privilege”. Women that kowtow with the “program”, in deference to God, lampoon our most uncharitable, sacrilegious, sanctimonious system of order. It is a system that relies on the deceit, dishonesty and partisan biased judgement of its user base. Never forget, all laws polarise judgement.

The crux of the arguments (ever so rarely in plain sight) supporting age legislation tend to rely on [corrupt] academic standards as “justification” for categorisations in place. Never mentioned are the numerous early teens “prodigies” put through the university system early. These are the anomalies that frustrate the “program”. The maturity gap, when inspected in detail, is far larger than most would imagine. For example, in relatively recent times a six year old British boy was heralded as the new oils (painting) master. Back in the 1980’s a petulant pup became a self-made millionaire (when being a millionaire meant something) in computers before he had reached his tenth year.

Martha Argerich’s (a celebrated Argentine virtuoso) notorious 1949 first public performance of the piano solo of Beethoven’s first concerto when she was seven years old presents an interpretation that would put most adults to shame. There is an account of a nine year old girl who successful singlehandedly reared the surviving family for several weeks after her mother died. Only lack of money ultimately frustrated her course. Given these facts, age legislation is indisputably unfair. Why is it supported so widely and so staunchly by our trembling masses?

There is a simple answer sadly seemed beyond the lateral comprehension of ordinary folk. In fact the answer has already been substantively outlined. People are generally pathetically weak and lazy. The largest, most incessantly in focus voices always seem to grab the limelight, founding “opinions” as they go. Mass Medias, therefore, control the way people generally think. Yes there are occasional dissenters, but, generally speaking, mass Medias tend to push (control) the populist view. That is because supporting broadcasters employed by mass Medias are people too. Broadcasters are not significantly different to any average man on the street. They too are mostly weak and lazy and don’t like to think too deeply about “obvious” issues. Of course, on the other hand, if the majority mysteriously morphed into dissenters, mass Medias would disappear as fast as they appeared and the “program” would perhaps have to engage dogmatic religion to shore up cultural adjustments once more.

Weakness and laziness by themselves do not cement opinions that are used to back legislation, such as edicts supporting age restrictions. People act because they feel empowered by acting. There is a fundamental perceived payoff for parents that support the synthetic dividers separating proscribed “children” from “adults”. The payoff is controlling power. Being the boss or “king” must be regarded as the pinnacle of empowerment and, consequentially, families have been moulded into control hierarchies. Perhaps this has always been the case. For as long as historic memory records, periodic shifts to varied standards used to justify different age categorisations have been relatively seamless. That, by no stretch of the imagination, makes wrong “right”.

We must never underestimate conditioning mechanisms in the background geared to advancing false status-quo. Currently, each new crop of sexual children is deliberately immersed in cultures of facile restriction. Years long torment offers the vague promise of “freedom” (age eighteen “adulthood”). Developmental pressure builds from “terrible teens” to graduation. Many have willingly tried to believe in law and order to be patriotic (one of the group). They never rebelled. They never came to terms with what they had been denied. They never attempted to discover. Therefore, the majority of emerging and new adults bitterly support a terrorising system because they were “forced” into making sacrifice themselves.

In other words, pathetically weak adults will go to any lengths to wreak revenge on their kith and kin simply to appease their own failed ethical development. If you cannot honour yourself, how is it possible to behave responsibly to others? The great tragedy is [it seems] that people are incapable of recognising their sexuality or, to a greater degree, understanding how corporate interestsstole their natural development. If age standards defining adulthood were radically shifted upwards to say forty years as the new age of consent, I do not believe there would be any major rebellion (after the first generation targeted was out of mind’s way). Old habits die hard, so I will concede the “powers” would have a hell of a marketing task ahead of them. How to convince all those marginalised people that merely want to behave naturally they are “wrong” to do so?

I have already outlined that British legislation tabled an increase to age twenty one in 2001, so why stop there? If the predominant cause behind age laws is nothing short of a population control/reduction measures, then (given the ever rising masses) logic suggests further increases are going to be ushered in. (Subtlyignoring the ethics nightmare exposing the true face of industrialism) China’s austere corporate experiment permitting only one child per family unit predictably failed dismally. Then again, if you can forbid sovereign adults “sexual license” by labelling them as “children” in legislation, the outlaw of procreation satisfies an expansion of the eugenics mantra. Ages twenty five and thirty marked traditional ancient Roman and Jewish commencement of maturity. Age fifty is of religious significance in Tibetan culture (and generally classed as the start of “middle age” in the west). Seventy five is another modern western classification milestone representing maturity or “old age”.

There potentially is no upper limit. Perhaps in the future sexual permits will be kept to octogenarians, the well-to-do that satisfy legal “exemptions” (loopholes) and “approved” (sanctioned) whores (to “service” the well-to-do)? Slavish automatons would do well to understand that each (fiendish) plan can only be stymied by the lack of faith of its designers. Confidence in communication is everything, but that is ultimately largely backed by compliance test initiatives. A sound pitch bolsters faith and the rest can be left to chance. What better target to exploit than “the family”? By turning corporate-political objectives into “family planning” advice, devious powers have cast a brilliant initiative. Families can now blame themselves for government issues and most will be oblivious to the fact. Admittedly a few have been waking up to the truth that “schooling” is actually social indoctrination in drag. But is this enough to spur momentum towards worldwide clear vision and outright revolution?

Times have changed greatly. In England years ago when attitudes were different, the age of consent was still sixteen. People could and did enter into marital unions at that age. These were normally sexual unions too. But that was trivial because teenagers (prevalently over twelve years old) also commonly interacted sexually. Legally underage pregnancies were unsurprisingly not particularly scarce. Ironically and sadly, the great “outrage” was against additional “family burden” as the young were obliged to be indoctrinated at school and few would have had the influence to earn “breadwinning money”. To me it shows just how pitifully inherently selfish people are. If only the vigour applied to blame and transference was directed at taking ownership of problems and compassionate dedication to delivery of lasting real solutions, then societies might be something to be proud of.

A long time ago, when I was fifteen, my mother asked my father to give me some sex advice. I vividly remember how he approached the cause. “You know all about it [sex], don’t you son?” He stammered, confidently. I nodded back wisely, as I had been the proud owner of a well-thumbed “hard core” adult magazine from age fourteen. Indeed, the pages were so well loved; they had come away from the staples in places. The point being is my father was too embarrassed to broach the subject of sex with me. It remained the unspoken understanding for as long as he lived. He used to use euphemisms like “it’s as easy as riding a bike” when he knew I kept damned well falling off. This is the norm, I’m told. Occasional controlling parents spew their ill-founded opinions. The rest offer silence when the silly puns run out.

Controlling parents aim to censor inappropriate behaviours. These might include masturbation in public. A Talmudic branch of Christianity called the Baptist Church (traditionally) labels masturbation a “sin”. Offspring of Baptist families are surely dealt all sorts of psychological blows unless they adjust to being exceptionally deceitful. When I was very young I remember all the local kids in my playgroup used to occasionally interact with [vaguely sexual] truth or dare games. My own junior sister was particularly prolific in her formative years. We lived in a rural Jacobean period farmhouse which had a winding spiral staircase to the upper floors. Between beams my father had lodged makeshift cream chipboard panels to form walls and these made as excellent “scribbling” white boards.

One day, after a rather heated discussion with my mother, my sister (then age six) drew a biro cartoon of a “matchstick” couple copulating to prove she knew about sex. I am not sure it was a masterpiece but it was technically sufficient for the purposes under scrutiny, earning an immediate deletion under a double layer of white paint. Interestingly my mother never punished my sister for that and said nothing more on the subject. What could she be “punished” for? Knowing the truth? It seems fitting to roll out Krishna’s immoral quote (a regular visitor to this website) once more, “Spirituality brings to freedom whereas forces of evil paralyse”. What would Krishna have said about modern day paedophilia hysterics?

Perhaps it is no accident that the powers behind their mischief “program” sometimes refer to themselves as the Annunaki Brotherhood. The Order’s iconography depicts a thick braided cross trapped by an unbroken wicker circle. Cosmically, a cross represents path choices but the circle closes off any avenue of inquisitive exploration. The icon, therefore, is the “prison planet” or Zionism symbol. It sets paralysis standards (put into motion by pharisaic usurpers); the ones Krishna described as “evil”. Social paralysis begins with restriction of will [of the child] to confuse the mind (spiritual centre) in order to produce broken, de-spiritualised adults (slaves by any other name). To socially outlaw sexuality is to remove the most fundamental of all birth rights. Bodies without minds are only capable of following orders.

But there is more. Few are aware of the true potence of sexual self-esteem. Potent life is contained in the chakra governing the erogenous zones from conception. Those that deliberately superficially attack sexual developmental behaviour aim tocreate literal zombies – walking dead!

Regular visitors should be aware of my other exo-political blog by now. In a sense the format is similar to here, but content focuses on everything “outside politics” (politics normally being the affairs of the people). Articles tend to be long and weighty. Recently, in conjunction with the alien theme, I set up a new website. It is a resource specifically catering for shorter bulletins or videos about paranormal, extra-terrestrial/dimensional matters. Ultimately the format will be expanded at some point as a political-conscience counterpart. In principle this will allow time pressed visitors the comfort of an easy stretch (writing topics never expanding beyond a thousand words). I plan to deliver Ozzie Thinker in brief if you will.

Today’s post is all about rigged justice, right royalty conspiracies and global enslavement of the masses in the name of Zionism. It should hardly surprise readers content has gone wayover-budget yet again (given the mythical ideal of 2,800 words). The count thus far has headed north of 7,000 (roughly a third of the size of my book, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”) so my die-hards are in for a treat. There is much more that could have been said and I rely on the “implications” of highlighted items as sufficient prudence for wider causes. I could have mentioned how vaccines and other “so-called” medicines are in place to reduce populations that refuse to die quickly. I hint at it but please keep an eye on the expansive work of Jon Rappoport. The cynical attack on the people from above becomes abhorrently clear. Fake psychiatry partnering with arsenals of toxic drugs is implicated between the lines weighing up tantalising titbits on MKUltra, McVeigh’s violent protest at the first Gulf War “AIDS epidemic” and other less conspicuous commentaries. In total, I script a journey from most ancient eras to present day. So all that’s left for readers to do now is strap in, hold tight and hang on for dear life.

Back in unknown Atlantis times justice was administered differently. Few realise that the traditional accoutrements issued to kings or queens at coronations represent “lost” supreme objects of incredible (literally) power. The crown was an all-purpose headdress which doubled as laser weapon (more deadly than today’s most lethal nuclear warheads) and other tricks, such as technology that made the wearer invisible. The sceptre is modelled on the ancient wand, mostly either used as a healing aid or a lower power stun weapon. Royal orbs, if operable, would miraculously dial into special remote (inherent) frequencies and stream perfect, true holographic records of past events. Yes, that’s correct, you’ve read me right. Everything, every last detail of time is streamed in pristine clarity. Under those terms, justice was unavoidable. The orb would simply determine absolute truth without the need for a single corrupt witness.

After the collapse of Atlantis (Tower of Babel), civilisation morphed from Aryan outlaw settlements eventually transforming into the Greco-Roman republics. Justice was no more. Instead a fusion of arbitrary mob rule accentuating individual royal might transferred as a “holistic” superficial magistrates system that relied on ad hoc, routine, biased investigations by “state appointees” similar to methods applied by modern day police. Given today’s constables’ exalted status in courtrooms, nothing much has changed at all. Opinions of police personnel are considered generally sacrosanct. In Greco-Roman times the magistrate would act as judge and juror in front of a governor, whose job was merely to decide the severity of each infraction.

The concept of citizenship was ushered in with various republic models that segregated different rights for “free men”, foreigners and slaves. By the Middle Ages in Europe conceptual refinement saw progression to the honourable man tradition; coordinating the peerage system. An honourable man (as termed) was deemed incapable of dishonour (unless corrupted by witches). Therefore, for these men criminal accusations were to require countersigned confessions as admissions of guilt. Sensationally, all manner of grotesquely imaginative tortures have been recorded as being used as the means of achieving necessary compliance in stubborn cases. It was thought honourable men would rather succumb (die) than admit dishonour. The notion was similar to the one applied to witches in the great inquisitions. Nevertheless, commoners were still generally processed in the old Greco-Roman way.

By Tudor period (15th century) England, justice had come far. Introduction of Star (contract) Chambers (for aristocrats) implied fair hearings were possible. For the first time in history, defendants were able to give their own counsel and provide case supporting evidence and witnesses (when permitted). Unfortunately that encouraged the appointment of politically aligned (corrupt) judges whose reputations sometimes preceded bias and ignorance more than before. According to surviving family members, Ann Boleyn eloquently substantiated her innocence of adultery before Henry VIII only to be bitterly refuted by the king’s better judgement. Admittedly the thought of transparency was a hollow one in this case as he had abolished all court judges. Nevertheless, the system was a definitely step in the right direction assuming fair application of law was applied.

Structured justice theoretically preceded Greco-Roman order. What became known as “Judaism” has a much more ancient past that stretches back to highway law used by outcasts of Atlantis. When Israel formalised as a nation from Russian/Iranian stock, a royal backed Sanhedrin (or court) was eventually created. Formally, a small panel of Pharisees (judges) debated with comparatively large numbers of Sadducees (scribes) to establish the numerous precedents required for that attempt at holistic legislature. Justice itself unfortunately still promoted mob rule. Each posse would form to round up the “wanted” something akin to folklore shrouding the “Wild West”. Imagination suggests the commonest infractions against law must have been adultery or blasphemy; both almost impossible to argue fairly. Accused would be subject to the reasoning of the local Pharisee, who literally acted as judge, juror and executioner (Does Jesus’ mock trial give us insight?). The closest we come to this method of outlaw enforcement today is the holus bolus ad hoc administration of Sharia Law “ISIS style” on lands lacking infrastructure.

Although Latin “Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat (the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies)” presumption of innocence was brought into Roman criminal law by Antonius Pius in the second century, it was rarely (if ever) referenced in court. Seventh century Islamic scholar Inam Nawawi, reinterpreting Qu’ranic Hadith (verses), is reputed to be the first to have upgraded “warranted suspicion” as circumstantially acceptable evidence against those who are accused. Nevertheless Roman and Islamic Law adhered to the common principle “onus of innocence or guilt is jointly that of the accuser and claimant”. The formal shift from common law to “innocent until proven guilty” was introduced to the British code of practice after English lawyer Sir William Garrow’s (1760-1840) sensational court arguments.

Naturally a French system of criminal justice was adopted by America (whose independence from Britain was funded by France) and therefore the Roman/Islamic “guilt before innocence is proved” (implying criminal societies) anchors justice standards there. Nevertheless, returning to the history of the British law courts, King Henry II appointed 18 judges to oversee common law justice. A declaration was made before the Assize of Clarendon (royal council) in 1166 detailing the judges’ national circuit. This also assumed a shift from common to federal law (a precursor to the Westminster System). 1346 ushered in a decree that judges could or would not be bribed (bound by oath). Notably Chief justice of the King’s Bench, William Thorpe, narrowly escaped the death penalty for bribery in 1350 by the resulting pardon which entailed his demotion. From Edward III’s (Confessor) reign, the judiciary became integrated with politics culminating in the creation of the Star Chambers (to become an integral part of the loaded Westminster System) mentioned before.

Henry VIII abolished all judges in his privy council and that led to a spike in executions (Wild West style) of common criminals. More than seven thousand deaths reported compared with infamous Bloody Mary’s three hundred sensational religious purges. Contrary to historic populism, Mary was a champion of social injustice in her own way, introducing (for the time) far reaching community improvements and reinstating some judges. Inextricable religious interference in regal political affairs had been cited as the supposed reason for the “breakup” of the vast Roman Empire. Truth paints a very different picture. Instruments of power simply shifted to Constantinople to rule by proxy utilising a prescient order of “untouchable” (or offend God) demagogue popes established first by Constantine I in the fourth century.

The earliest “Zionist” king to break the stranglehold of the Roman Catholic overseers was Henry VIII in 1530’s. Though the Church of England formerly dates back to 587AD after Saint Augustine’s celebrated mission, Henry formally renounced the Papacy in order to divorce his then wife (Spanish royal), Catherine of Aragon. Spain and Portugal were trailblazing all the Catholic merchant routes into the New World at the time, so Henry’s disobedience was very serious. Iron Queen, Elizabeth I, zealously continued her father’s tyranny once more stripping all judges of rank and duty and used the churches as “local gazetteers” announcing new laws of the realm (widening the shift to federalism over common law) imposing hefty fines (a shilling per infraction) on anyone failing to attend Sunday services. She was also the one that was ultimately posthumously behind the establishment of the Virginia Company; historic owner of the United States of America.

Therefore, the “pilgrim” (religious merchants) New World founding fathers were actually agents of Zionism sent to oversee trading concerns. America was meant to be kept the great secret, but fate had other ideas. It is fairly obvious to anyone with half a brain that Ireland was earmarked to become the “new Israel” after pharisaic elites adopted incognito status when the Siege of Jerusalem (66-69AD) was over. In effect the Union of Jacob mecca (unified British Isles) shifted to the New World under rule of the pilgrims. Ireland, for various reasons, was too hard to settle/conquer so the powers opted for England eventually. As for “old Israel”, it is painfully clear the reason that the Sanhedrin was never reinstated (comparably, the modern abomination, the Knesset, is a monstrous sham) because the Pharisees had assumed total power. Consistent with this line of thinking, either the supposedly destroyed second temple was regarded as a heresy by religious purists or it was an idiom that had never [physically] existed.

If all (or most) Caucasians were the original Jews (as is indicated by the Genome Project), it is no wonder that Zionists have desperately tried to water down global genetic stocks. This is evidenced by their fraudulent rhetoric promoting “one race” as basis for dreaded multiculturalism. The great, traditionally “white”, population centres have been “multicultured” at every waking opportunity. Russia (Mahgog) is the last domino to fall. The old Soviet Union was not entirely “broken” by the Zionists and still presents the greatest superficial threat to their horrific brand of “Order”. Let us not forget, many lost Jews returned from Russia after Israel was repatriated in 1948. If Michael Tsarion’s impressions are correct, then peoples of Israel even prior to 70AD had numerous population exoduses (some gentlyimplied by biblical and other historic textual references).

There are other things I can add. The popularisation of the notion that the giant “bolshy” Philistine warriors were the ancestors of (average sized) Palestinians is highly implausible. Careful consideration of character points attribution to the obstinate ancient Greeks, whose warriors were also renowned for their great stature. Criticism of Jewish-“Arab” kings, notably the Herod’s, unconvincingly combines scandalous hearsay with those laughably hyperbolic character assassinations of Roman Emperors’ Caligula and Nero. Commonality reveals all tainted parties worked in union to take on the Pharisees and researchers with cool heads can plainly see it was said attacks on pharisaic domination that is the common factor tragically obscured by those humorous exaggerations or out-and-out lies. Herod Antipas could not have survived all the ailments described by Flavius Josephus (including something that might equate to “cancer of the genitals”) less function!

Josephus, the only contemporary “Roman” historian that bothered to mention Jesus, clearly was Jesus (as determined by the clever Latin anagram concealed in Josephus but there are other obvious clues too). This meant that Jesus’ ministry ran from 66-69AD logically coinciding with the Siege of Jerusalem, beginning when he was months away from [Jewish] maturity (age 30). It was immediately after that the persecutions of the “Christians” (though first appearing as a term in Mark’s Acts of the Apostles, probably more regularly adopted long after the Gnostic exodus to North Africa) began and this consequentially saw disciple (a euphemism for bodyguard) Peter (probably an alias) scooped up and interviewed by [Roman] aristocratic bohemian social-networker (spy), Mark (or Marcus) to plausibly distort (Romanise) Jesus’ philology. As a young apostle, he would have presumably been on first name terms with Jesus/Josephus. In fact, I question whether he also doubled as the persona “Judas Iscariot” and that is why he exclusively revealed the bribe secret (in Acts).

Competent deduction impresses the realisation that it was the Gnostic Essenes that were scattered by the Roman incursion 70AD and many [survivors] ended up relocating to Egypt or Turkey rebranding as Christians later. Not all buried prized literatures (euphemistically known as Dead Sea Scrolls) have been discovered yet, they were that well hidden. In addition an eighth century amnesty was given to Ashkenazi Turkish Jews (capitalising on potentially corrupt “converts”) and why the folklore/tradition of Ireland/England’s ancient Celts had so many corresponding similarities to those of the Semitic local peoples (given the inexplicable distance between them). Gaelic (the Irish language) is substantially about two fifths Hebrew.

Cordially, I deduce that epistles compiled to build the New Testament doctrine actually presented pharisaic dogma designed to undermine or [ideally] make Gnosticism obsolete. Fundamentally the core difference between the two cults is Gnostics believe in spiritual atonement through the management of mind over matter. For the Pharisee, mind is irrelevant, spirituality superfluous as existence can only be celebrated as the exclusive domain of flesh (physicality). Zionists distort this as hybrid atheism, but it is a corruption of the “wisdom of blasphemy” ideology (a measure to maintain the purity of spirituality), which acts as an anti-contamination fence partitioning the exclusive higher “un-breached” realm of God. Was Moses’ issuance of divine commandments the beginning of the corruption of faith? Our present day battle ground, the unrestricted medical use of marijuana, conceivably by population majorities (given genetic potential for cancers courtesy of petro-carbons) is the great threat (to Zionist Order). Whilst comparatively impotent Pentecostal breath work, Islamic and Catholic fasting festivals could theoretically induce mild Manyanastate; it is not close to the paradoxical oneness with nature achieved under influence of cannabis. If the Elohim were ever allowed a universal foothold again, it would awaken the beast that is contained by oblivion.

Ego-maniac Saul aka Paul had the bare-face to admit he was a “persecutor of Christians” who saw the light. The operation was a pivotal political move for the Pharisees and I wonder whether more can be read into the choice of the Damascus Road as the conversion location, given the current (Pharisee engineered) problems in Syria. Is there another link (ISIS) with Damascus steel used by legendary Varangian Guard mercenaries? The letters to Romans and Corinthians only demonstrate Paul’s seeing the light negated his Christian group infiltration and subsequent ideological corruption. Jesus’ discovery tour is reduced to unrequited pharisaic “bell, book and candle” dogma. It is no coincidence these works have been made the favourites of tyrannous missionaries and Pentecostal lay preachers.

The only “gospel” that directly records the actual words of Josephus is John (Fourth Gospel) as he likely issued tempered sentiment through his brother-in-law scribe, Lazarus, in order to [plausibly] confuse students familiar with his own writing style. We see the treasonous “Jesus, rightful King of Jews” sub-plot in all gospels, so there is no way Josephus would have made himself easily recognisable, in my opinion (just glimpses for the fans). Though unconfirmed, I believe a single word of the original manuscript (Jesus’ working copy) has survived. A complete John’s Gospel discovered in Alexandria [arguably] dating back close to the contemporary period has certainly been doctored. It would be implausible to think otherwise. I suspect the Pharisees’ agents would have ghost written over existing texts, extinguishing anything controversial other than the most ambiguous Gnostic philosophy (that few would be educated enough to comprehend) and anything else that wouldn’t change history. Anyone that has dabbled with the Hermetica’s celebration of nature’s divine engineering (i.e. why do mountains have flat tops?) and wondrous support of life (perhaps expanded by seventeen century Baruch Spinoza’s timeless neo-Gnostic poetry?) would empathise.

Gauging the closeness of ancient Greek philosophy when compared with gnostic wisdom and the proto-Israelite (according to Josephus), Greek “Hyksos”, takeover of Babylon, I feel certain my earlier insistence on their connection with the Philistines is correct. Conceivably, these may have also been a branch of the feared Varangian Guard too, which, Graham Hancock theorises, were highest bidder mercenaries not tied to any nation in particular. The only other possible contenders were the equally feared Negro tribes, but these have been identified as Nubians from the land of Kush (Ethiopia) in biblical and other ancient texts. Supposed decedents of the Queen of Sheba have led to the recognition of a small Jewish black population group called the Falashas. For Solomon to have married in to Nubian society demonstrates just how importantly strategic the labour resource was at the time.

Pharisees and rabbinical Jews are best known for their rational ideologies and trading abilities. The grand key to this success has been the introduction of money (whether in the form of barter tokens or hard cash). According to biblical Genesis, Abraham subtly canonised the Talent (an ancient version of Shekel) by offering mammon to God in place of the traditional first born son. Even hard line fanatics struggle with the notion ancient patriarchs unconscionably put the first son to death for God. What sort of God would want that injustice? In fact, prior to Abraham’s pledge, rumours of infant sacrifice are absent from Jewish folklore (note: to purge society of perceived wickedness was culturally acceptable).

It seems to me that it was Abraham that inexplicably decided the first born son should be sacrificed in order to create a levy to canonise currency. No sons had actually been sacrificed. The “op” was merely a device to impose commerce and twist faith into dogma at the same time. The significant implication was every single child bearing family needed to work or trade as a means of supporting their tribute to God. Even when sacrifice is interpreted metaphorically, the same reasoning applies. If the first born son’s “sacrifice” was seen as being pure to God (technically a form of utopian blasphemy), retribution fearing parents would have been forced to pay up or suffer the consequences.

Jericho shamefully revealed wars were nothing short of vehicles for plunder leaving disenfranchised surviving populations stripped of dignity and natural rights. Those were the lucky ones. Many populations were consequentially processed as slaves to be used as bonded labour. Orthodox rabbinical “religious” doctrine assured this fodder was lower in status than “animals”, void of protection and to be treated in any way “deemed fit” or terminated at the “slightest infraction of the will of the masters”. Whereas the Goyim (regularly translated as strangers) are considered to be non-Jews or gentiles, this may not be correct for “goy” is the Hebrew word for “nation”. Thus, strictly, Goyim should be translated as “nationals” or “those of nations”. Of course, meaning actually depends on the stigma attached to the usage of a given term. Nevertheless, as many Jewish clansmen remain unidentified and lost to history, logic presupposes subsequent presumed gentile nations were just as Jewish as their captors. Additionally, the Kabbalah and Talmud are loaded with Hindu/Buddhist comparisons which suggest all regions stem from a single ideological source.

Consortiums of merchants have been responsible for manufacturing just about everything associated with national pride or patriotism which is geared to reproducing the royal Mandela effect. This has not exclusively been a Jewish preoccupation, though trade has tended to assume Caucasian migration routes. Japan was at war with China at regular intervals long before western industrialists discovered the islands group. China’s Silk Road proffers a history stretching back thousands of years which provided ample opportunity for Jewish militias to establish protection rackets and other nationalistic infrastructures. These became the forerunners of banking systems (masonic orders cloaking dissident merchant alliances). At the beginning of a power move by these merchants, backed royals were first encouraged and then press ganged into behaving flamboyantly – spectacles that separated themselves from everyday commoners. Greater control over the people could only be expanded by conquering new territories. If any allied king became war weary, his enemies were the immediate investment targets of the devious pseudo-bankers.

Nevertheless, ultimately the royals held all the wealth of land even while possessedby surrogates. When King John of England seized vast tracts of common lands after 1211, he exemplified this reasoning. Whereas the folklore of Robin Hood disguises the First Barons (civil) War 1215-17, it was the conflict between royalty and aristocratic merchant bankers that underwrote the Magna Carta treaty and first step towards holistic cartel-controlled global federalism (becoming reality after the execution of King Charles I in 1649). That is why the powers today so uncharacteristically celebrate the event and not because it furbished plebeians with liberty. It was always presumed that “the people” were the “natural owners” of the land that was seized, when they never were. After the Magna Carta came into being, a tithes system was rapidly implemented making the truth abundantly clear. Peasants paid rent as tenants of “their” land holdings. In effect, the squire of the manor was your friendly merchant lease-issuer (banker) of the time.

Sensational Viking (some argue were a branch of the Varangian Guard given their size and special steel weapons) takeover of Britain 793-876 saw tribute paid in sums of silver coins until Ethelred finally defeated the invaders at the Battle of Reading. Prior, when forces found no tribute, they ransacked local populations. That style of remedial action was not limited to the Vikings. Edward the Confessor’s Welsh, Scottish and Irish wars were to impose the same sort of extortion funnel. Our modern day “taxes” are variants of this style of exaction. “The people” have always been required to supply the resources for commerce. In that way, nothing has changed, except some argue all income taxes supply “first world” national war chests under the flimsy excuse of defence.

Without doubt, prior to having the strength to go it alone, pharisaic Jews partnered with the Catholics combining as a mock Zionist-Rosicrucian (old Atlantis) front. Given the historic press, it seems likely most of the prior Roman leaders had been proto-agents of Zionism (I use the term in the sense – fortress Earth prepared for the global elites) too. I am unclear whether Mohamed was the new Jesus purveying a unique breed of Gnosticism or a Pharisee double agent in light of the overzealous corruption of the ideology and philosophy of Islam since his death. Could the “Jews” killed in Medina have been Gnostics; ancestors of the Cathars? Jewish William the Conqueror did little more than partially “unify” Europe and impose Catholic Christianity on the Brits. Catholicism, let us never forget, desperately tried to manufacture an illusion, reducing investigative science (any opportunity to demystify) to heresy and launch regular inquisition waves for the specific aim of purging naturopath (oneness with nature/God or pantheist) physicians branded witches.

Druidic Celtic (Gnosticism) customs (equally aligned to pantheism) were gradually made impotent and integrated as trite rebranded “customs of worship”. The harvest festival eventually virtually lost all meaning, although it is heartening to learn ancient customs have been kept alive by a wick over thousands of years and there has been a mild renaissance of values (white witchcraft) on the back of the fraudulent New Age movement. Wholesale import of Jews from 1066 did test the Church of England. Records of significant contracts (Rabbi notarised Starra) bankrolling kings, such as Richard I, began in the 1100’s. It did more to highlight the lack of goodwill between noblemen than specifically implicate Zionist bad practice. Exploitation of this lack of goodwill became the trademark that built the later Rothschild Empire. Edward I of England attempted to put a stop to banking practices with the Jewish Affairs Bill of 1275, which outlawed interest bearing loans (considered a heresy) partially in response to the earlier Baron Wars. In 1290 he took unprecedented step of expelling the Jews in entirety (not returning in significant numbers until the 1500’s to a welcoming Zionist, Henry VIII) forcing traditions underground.

If the period of kings with absolute authority began to wither with the collapse of the Roman Empire, pseudo-governance by the Constantinople (annex of today’s Turkey as part of the earlier expansive Greek Empire) based Catholic Papacy had allowed greater merchant control. Coupled with the numerous external influences on the system, with equivalents to modern day Zionist “lobbyists” such as the Nicolaitians (there at Catholicism’s conception), was a fanatical underlying determination to eventually seize absolute power. Fanaticism transformed into reality with the formularisation of the Rothschild banking empire which expanded as the great East India Company over several generations.

The conversion to overall power began with the capture and civil execution of unrepentant English king, Charles I (1649). It was no coincidence the banking industry changed forever from 1660, even though the Italian Medici’s (Roman black aristocracy) had formulated corporate (orders from the grave) infrastructure templates between 1397 and 1472, just before the United States of America was “miraculously” discovered (1492) by Columbus who was financed by them. Because the powers had planned for the region to be a secret “Promised Land” by invite only, mid nineteenth century gold fever exoduses had not been calculated, arguably destroying all cultural ambitions hence. Consequentially, politics in the US for a long while assumed relative transparency with limited (to those exclusively supported) fair governance set as the overall precedent. That is why Andrew Jackson was able to revoke the First National Bank’s charter in 1836 for “yielding too much corporate power”.

The game was over (and America became “corporate” property) after the oligarch’s war (generally known as the American Civil War, 1861-65 through use of civilian fodder) when Andrew Johnson’s 14th Amendment (1868) effectively converted the Constitution into an abridged corporate charter (akin to the other great coup for the Zionists – the Magna Carta). Universal commerce (manipulating land that could now be owned) saw land values intrinsically underpinned by finance after Britain adopted the Dutch mortgage system with William of Orange’s appointment to the throne in 1696. He was the king that hastily introduced the [oh so often] misquoted “Bill of Rights” which, contrary to popular psychosis, was exclusively for merchant classes and not the commoners. Reasoning was devoted to halting any future royal reclaimers after James II tried to reinstate his absolute authority over politics (such as seizing treasonous businesses and jailing owners) before he was forced into exile by Zionist militias.

The “Bill of Rights” was conceptually integrated with the American Constitution via the 1791 “Fifth Amendment” reform. Modern day usage is regularly celebrated as a troubled industrialist’s “get out of jail free” mechanism. For the industrialists (Zionists), it was imperative the precursor to consumerism, luxury trade, was expanded at every opportunity. The greater influence trading networks had on everyday life assured the industrialists hold on everyday life. Establishment of the New World was a small step in the chain. English king Henry VIII’s wife, Ann Boleyn, was the envy of upper class society after she publically showed off {enormously valuable for the time] peacock feathers attached to her attire. Exotic produce in industrial quantities began to broaden markets from the 1570’s under Elizabeth I, hence her interest in the Virginia Company (owner of the United States of America).

Yet it was the same corporate greed that broke Sir Isaac Newton’s gold standard in 1797 with Britain forced to issue royal stamped Spanish doubloons for a few months (under George III). The New World commodity, tea, at the market peak (circa 1750) spiralled to a staggering price equating to $1 million per pound ($15K a mug) retail (by today’s standards). Don’t complain so much next morning cuppa! The spectacular market collapse is known as the South Sea Bubble. Templates were set from that initial learning curve and, rather than heeding the warnings, most financial collapses have been engineered ever since, including the 2008 Grand Financial Crisis (GFC).

Old wounds die hard and after the demise of Norman William Conqueror’s family line, English kings steadily attempted to de-integrate commonwealth links with unified France. French influence over the Papacy (including putting an end to Zionist force, the Knights Templar, after the torturous death of 23rd Grand Master Jacques De Molay, 1292) created strain over relations with England. The pope’s meddling in sovereign affairs of Scotland and Ireland did nothing to improve harmony. It would be fair to say that by Henry VIII’s time, the Catholics had no more than token influence on British royal politics. Recalcitrant British authority over the rest of the globe continued even after royal autonomy had been completely extinguished reaching a tentative pinnacle with the invasion of the newly “independent” US in 1812. This, I believe, was an attempt to stigmatise colonisation of the new nation and fend off possible mass exoduses rather than a real power grab. It also suggests to me the “greatness” of puppet royal Queen Victoria was manufactured to impress history.

It is no coincidence that the Rothschild’s empire base in France stemmed from their role financing US independence (founding members of Illuminati Order 1st May, 1776 were Rothschild associates) and the French “revolution” was also bankrolled by them for a mere 1,250,000 pounds sterling. Not only did France and America both become common “Republics” in 1789, but the emancipation of French Jews coincided with the 1791 American Fifth Amendment. That extraordinary bond has continued to the present day. Some so-called NWO “insiders” view the storming of the bastille as the commencement of the total enslavement of humanity.

There are numerous other important bumps forward for the oppressors of virtue that could be highlighted, but I would like to speed ahead to the last hundred years. Simultaneous large wars in China, South Africa and Colombia at the end of the nineteenth century tested indiscriminate killing on industrial scales. However, the Zionists were blessed with a pleasant bonus. Concentration camps of St Helena were that effective at killing off captured civilians, they have been standardised as a punitive measure of war ever since (most recently as FEMA camps). Expanding way beyond military zones, I wonder whether the humanitarian camps established in Africa in accordance with the war on famine are in place to help or hinder populations of stricken regions. I shan’t dwell on the double standards of the Red Cross.

The first “world” war was merely implemented to break Germany and Russia where royal patronage was considered too strong for manageable Zionism. Ironically, the Russian Romanov dynasty was in place courtesy of Rothschild funding for the war against the Cossacks (now in Ukraine?) 1771-75. History of the Chinese Dowagers may not parallel but is equally important. Rule by Imperial dynasties ceased with the death of Empress Cixi in 1908. It is widely argued by alternative historians that the shift of politics did not change the dynamic (hidden) royal power base even into Mao’s regime. Never too far away from the limelight, recent sources of unknown origin have sensationally painted the infamous Dragon Family as being party to a supposed minor repayment of an old American ($4 trillion) debt. In 2008, according to this conspiracy, a large shipment of tungsten-tainted gold bars (worth $ billions) was allegedly delivered through Chinese triads. Whereas I find it compellingly plausible enough to mention, for my research I have not validated allegations.

Many other key items could have been included in my chronology (such as the manipulation of gold), but ones listed are the most important when gauging a sense of perspective on the direction of how the world was won.

Before reading on, an important anomalous misconception needs to be clarified before unfair judgement is made. Whether Helena Blavatsky’s Theosophical Society stood for (dare I say?) truth or deception is by no means clear. Theosophists’ explanation of the proposed role of thought being and archangel, Lucifer, as all consuming “logos” remote controller of Earth is painfully correct. Lucifer formulated the (labelled) survival of the fittest system on Earth, conceived with the dinosaurs (manufactured by affiliated Drakkon geneticists). An unending incarnate environmental war replaced [prior] universal white light order because trade or control measures had always encouraged conflict resulting in wanton destructive, nihilistic assaults.

Nevertheless, where I take umbrage at Theosophical wisdom is in the construction of “Satan”. Those that understand the history of the very first star ever to bless the cosmos will realise subsequent folklore surrounding the many namesakes called Satan have no more than superficial or unrelated connections. Indeed, the earliest recognitions of the “fall of man” (as the desired Annunaki image of God) are profoundly aligned to white light order or Gnosticism in the raw. The Theosophists loose correctness with the human ego analogy seems more like something that may have been cultivated in high Victorian Illuminati satanic covens. In practicality, the ego is what remains of the (so-called) fall of man which (in turn) was the consequence of the error of Sophia (father) permitting biased (existential) manifestation that forged the ever present character paradox between ideological (holy spirit) and scoped reality (son). It is strange that Blavatsky was born in Ukraine (or Khazaria), perennial home to Zionism. Are the Theosophists manipulators or manipulated is the unanswered (for my research) $64 question?

Key outcomes in chronological order were:

1833 British and 1866 US “Abolishment of Slavery” (in practicality “anything but”) Acts made all “common citizens” potential bonded labour assets and removed the need to provide communal social security (hence the rapid emergence of Dickensian “charitable” labour camps from the Victorian period onwards). Prior, when sectioned commoners had been slaves (in the case of the Irish – a humanitarian post war measure) the implication was the owner had a moralduty of care towards all cooperative bonded workers

1914 Federal Reserve issued the first unbacked currency, German papiermark

1916 Battle of Somme sanctioned the indiscriminate slaughter of over one million Caucasian Goyim (proto-Jews)

1917 Thule Society formed (later encourages Adolph Hitler’s membership) and attempts to refine some of the Illuminati “satanic” occult practices and their obsession with the paranormal

1919 WWI reparations against Germany leveraged the special relationship with France (Rothschild bankers) in order to funnel gold in massive quantities to jump start the US consumer boom (euphemistically known as the roaring 20’s). Zionist “communism” (radical state-sanctioned socialism) tested in Russia

1920 Hire purchase introduced on a commercial-scale as the prelude to ownership of mortgaged common classes

1921 End of private British banknote issuers after (Rothschild adjunct) Lloyds of London acquired Fox, Fowler and Company. Council of Foreign Relations was founded as an elite watchdog of the 1920 League of Nations (testing global federalism)

1929 Sensational Wall Street Crash after gold was sucked from US by (Rothschild affiliated) Federal Reserve bankers to build up Hitler’s Germany for his chancellorship, bankrupting the American people in the process

1933 Theosophist Adolph Hilter is appointed Chancellor of Germany only after the Zionists are granted the Haavara (homecoming to Palestine) Agreement. Sunni (pharisaic) Islamic Saudi Arabia secured after the commercial collaboration with US Standard Oil. Later this would become Arab American Company (ARAMCO)

1934 Zionists back Mao Tse Tung to destabilise the massive Chinese populations in an attempt to break the phantom royal Dowagers. Lawyer Maurice Fishbein began steps to dismantle Royal Rife’s universal cancer cure (completed 1939)

1939 Declaration of [what was to become] World War II or “the final act [of enslavement]” according to NWO “insiders”. Medicinal cannabis outlawed because of its celebrated potency as a healing agent.

1940 Katyn massacre after the Soviet (Russia) invasion of Poland wiped out just about all key military and police officers leaving an estimated 22,000 (including civilians) dead. This was to control the key trading port, Danzig

1941 Pentagon founded from consolidation (in part) of a collaboration of militias that once served the interests of the Zionist merchant consortium, the (Rothschild controlled) British East India Company

1945 Oriental threat, Japan, is broken by the Zionists. League of Nations rehash, the United Nations, founded as the future utopian administrative centre of global federalism (a fusion of Zionism and hybrid Catholicism). Theosophist disciple, Alice Bailey, wrote the New Age intellectual philology

1947 Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) established as post-war insurance against over exertion of the Pentagon

1949 George Orwell’s divine prophecy “1984” mocks Israelite grand elitist plans. US Greenback becomes the new currency standard after the Bretton-Woods agreement. Chiang-Kai-shek supported (militarily) by US subordinates as insurance against Zionism (today Taiwan holds the largest global supply of nuclear warheads according to Douglas Dietrich. That is why fickle Zionist China cannot invade). Pentagon expanded as North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) as a measure against the non-existent “communist (Zionist) threat”

1950 Operation Paperclip (managed by the Office of Strategic Services) began repatriation of key German NAZI scientists into the US, many to support the air force, NASA and so on. Over 1500 were eventually relocated

1951 Never registered American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) was formed from “illegal” (per 1938 Registration of Foreign Agents Act) American Zionist Committee (created 1949)

1953 Inspired by Orwell (1984), North Korea established as a Zionist secret haven and nuclear weapons store. This is where the [nuclear] attack on Iran will originate from and why visitation from unwelcome eavesdroppers (foreign tourists) is discouraged [via incessant mainstream propaganda] or strictly managed from within

1954 Mass production and sensational advertising of highly toxic filtered cigarettes designed to slowly kill off useless eaters

1962 US-French Vietnam failed war for commerce in part [a false flag] to disguise the true purpose of the Korean War

1963 Assassination of JFK for daring to attempt to introduce silver backed currency

1966 Assassination of Harold Holt (Australian Prime Minister) for reintroducing silver currency. LSD outlawed in the US because users could access inherence (pure truth) under Influence

1971(-75) Zionist-American plans for the ongoing shape of Globalism. Nixon declares “war on drugs” in order to break the anti-Zionist “Hippie” movement

1972 Watergate eventually exposed CIA’s MKUltra program (1980) which proved attempts had been made at cultivating “Manchurian candidate” sleeper terrorists

1973 “Futures and options” were instrumented as a new commerce exchange mechanism by Wall Street traders. US “futures debt” is said to currently exceed $200 trillion. David (John) Rockefeller founded and chaired the Trilateral Commission

1974 Creation of the theoretical Petrodollar

1975 Saw the end of Vietnam War. Pol Pot’s (circumstantial) purge of Cambodian social intellectuals tests the systemisation of a nation

1978 US Army distributed a “Handbook to Chaplains” which listed the Church of Satan and Temple of Set as tolerated “other religions”. Lieutenant Colonel Michael Aquino (head of the Temple of Set) had been “Pentagon Chaplain” at some point (no reference cited) according to Douglas Dietrich.

1979 British Secret Service assisted Ayatollah (Islamic Jesuit – fusion of Islam, Judaism and Catholicism) Khomeini to leave French exile ousting Arch-Zionist Shah Pahlavi and seizing Persia. This led to the highly unpopular creation of the austere Islamic (Shia) Republic of Iran. Zionists set up the Mujahedeen as a counter political measure and have been trying to control from within by different means ever since

1991 (perhaps earlier) The FBI began a faux war on child pornography virtually exclusively creating the internet “market” as an ongoing sting operation. This was a late phase of the strategy that imposes synthetic standards of “adulthood” as preparation/indoctrination for forced state servitude (voting, working and other perceived privilegesthat are actually violating obligations). Yugoslavia used to war test (unauthorised) NATO calculated to permanently break Slavic rebellion against the corporates

1993 A special weather research project called HAARP was set up at Alaska’s Fairbank University. Janet Reno (allegedly a lover of Hillary Clinton) ordered the FBI to successfully use lethal force against defenceless untried American citizens that were part of a Seventh Day Adventist splinter called the “Dravidians”. No one has been held accountable for the murders of the Texans to date

1995 Oklahoma City bombing was an “inside job” dry run for the notorious Zionist commissioned 9/11 attack. Guilty mis-adventurer Timothy McVeigh acted in outrage at the effects forced medications had had on fellow Gulf War veterans (43,000 reported with “AIDS like” symptoms). Those responsible for the actual destruction have never been formally identified or apprehended

2003 Invasion of Iraq to secure the corporate oil industry (which had been nationalised by Saddam Hussein) and plunder ancient Sumerian secrets (detail on how to construct ancient technologies) newly discovered by German archaeologists

2004 Christmas tsunami was the first successfully targeted HAARP attack. Strategic explosives ignited an underwater Sumatran volcano, but the resulting shock/tsunami had been much bigger than anticipated. Techniques for this method were allegedly channelled via the Pentagon’s Draco-Satanist alliance (legacy of Michael Aquino) or was there a connection with ancient secrets plundered in Iraq? Poland joined the European Union

2005 London bombings exposed the possibility that “suicide” bombers were remotely triggered and potentially not even aware of complicity in terrorism

2007 Grand financial crisis (GFC) used to break (reengineer) the European Union and the first punitive measure in the steps to a “universal” cashless electronic currency. Flaccid Al Qaeda “op” rebrands as ISI (later ISIL). Cheney exports unknown numbers of nuclear warheads (designated for the eventual attack on Iran via North Korea) to Japan using the diplomatic bag as an insurance measure against possible Chinese rebellion (linked to the alleged tainted gold shipment of 2008?)

2009 First unquestionable use of a (MKUltra programmed) “Manchurian candidate” for the Fort Hood shootings

2010 HAARP attack via satellite destabilises Haiti causing devastating earthquakes. Aftershocks have been catastrophic for New Zealand, Japan and Chile. BP “oil spill” and pollution of the Gulf of Mexico was a deliberate strategy in the bitter war against deep sea “extra-terrestrial” colonies. Poland’s key leaders (civil and military) were killed in a Russian plane crash (probably shot down) in retaliation against Walesa’s Solidarity movement ousting Zionist-communism. Best (superficial) evidence that Putin is an Israeli agent of doom

2011 Putin launched as the Russian (Mahgog) New Age Messiah by the dead-eyed “alternative Medias”. The land of Phut (Libya) conquered as the first phase of biblical prophecy (Ezekiel and others). All-out (world) war in Syria began

2016 Obama fast tracking of Maritime Law geared to eroding control of US constitution for succession to United Nations oversight (or formal global federalism) almost complete

I would like to conclude by giving my fellow Arab-American journalist, best known as Mantiq Al-Tayr, another introduction. His tireless efforts at raising awareness of how Zionist domination has impinged on American and everyman liberty are to be commended. A recent article covering the Israeli managed Trump/Clinton farce introduced the public figure, Grant Smith. To his monumental credit Grant doesn’t see American sovereignty as logically subject to Zionist oversight. In a short video presentation (under 15 minutes) he packs in (to name a few highlights) nuclear treason (NUMEC, Shapiro, Apollo Affair), manipulation of the Registration of Foreign Agents Act, the Lavron Affair, US-Israel Free Trade Area (UIFTA) and notably how Monsanto tried to stand up against the Zionist beast in the mid 1980’s. There’s plenty more to say, but I feel digestion will have to wait until the next instalment on the subject. Enjoy the movie.

This may not be my last episode regarding US enablers of sacrilegious ruling “Zionist but barely Jewish” parties that oppress the peoples of Israel and beyond, but I am hoping I have scoped a near complete picture when factoring the enormous amount of information contained in parts one, two and three. Our wise schedulers of monstrous tyranny and turmoil are so predictable they should be remembered as buffoons, but the laughs are very much on them at the moment as their targets fail to rally against them in any way that could be classed as remotely productive. Remonstrations and protests alone are not worthy of commendation. Demonstrative acts of belligerence from those that could count have been scant to non-existent.

I refuse to be drawn into the ongoing prolific fantasy and, therefore, have found merit in forging a detailed historic profile rather than emphasising individual stunts, such as the latest embarrassing attack in France. After Joseph Stalin’s “the end justifies the means”, reasons for specific events and timings are in some ways incidental, in my opinion. Strategic “positioning” is not. Thus, those that find all sorts of strange devilish symbols, numeric links hinting at intrigue in the form of some kind of sinister masonic conspiracy may well be correct in their opinions. Let’s face it, without specific calendar markers, the schedule would be pretty damned shoddy to non-existent. When shall we meet and where? How about on Wednesday, planet Earth? I believe preconceived dates trigger action “countdowns”.

In addition heritage or prosperity is very important to the mischievous fiends. Not only do they like to brag about their satanic deeds superfluously in the mainstream Medias, but they also insist official history gloats along with them in a rabid attempt at making them appear posthumously immortal. That is why corporations (dead men’s orders) rule by rote and have all the rights in the living world. In prognosis, it is not merely the symmetry of dates that can be explained predictably and rationally. What better way to coordinate parties unknown to each other than by creating a numerological catalogue only privy to secret societies’ vouchsafe members?

Of course there would need to be lots of dates, plenty of opportunities to strike because humans make mistakes. Hallowed plans often don’t come to fruition, so we can assume most of the dates are used as contingencies. Remember, in this case, our arrogant shadowy controllers are predictable buffoons. How many attempts at so-called “911” went by unnoticed? The mainstreamers would hardly offer pomp and circumstance over failings they would rather forget. Even so, analysis of the 911 incident reveals a monumental marketing disaster and irresponsible blow against commerce. It did not go to plan, but this game will plod on relentlessly until the people, in their masses, rise up. David Icke has made many errors, but as an instigator of valour he poses many exciting possibilities for those prepared to act on his wisdom.

Players in the game must have been groomed to have the license to capitulate; otherwise the status quo would have collapsed prior to the “globalist” Greeks. Does the great British soccer team, Arsenal, arbitrarily stick an unbiased globe with a sharp pin as basis for European Cup selection matches? Under those contrived conditions, we might see professional players pitched against humble patrons and staff of the Banana Bar & Club, Suva, Fiji, for instance. No, that would reduce world class football to pointlessness, nihilism. So why would anyone theorise international politics bumbles along aimlessly in chaotic fashion, each strategy step (if there were any) accidental and not debated in minute detail by those with holistic interests at stake, whether outcomes ultimately reflect considerations or not? Of course everything is planned infinitesimally. What’s more, good guys and bad guys are scripted players of the exact same fantasy.

Ok, I’m getting ahead of myself. I wanted to begin by saying that notes for this segment already exceeded 3,500 words. That’s now in addition to the 600 words or more I have contributed to the introduction to part four thus far. It seems to me that it is extremely unlikely I will have time to nail it conclusively without penning a final “part five” in the not too distant future. Have I used “plan” too much already? Oh, I can’t think of a substitute. At short notice, that’s the plan. Part four will be followed by a scintillating final instalment; one that, hopefully, knocks the socks off.

If I could somehow summon a really theatrical saga, that would have the potential of being scintillating, because humans are hooked on drama. I know of individuals that have devoted their entire lives to reliving popular television soap operas in their minds, whilst generally behaving like couch potatoeswith opinions in all other ways. International political stakeholders merely bring this addiction out in the open. Imagine how boring it would be without those bombs and baddies. They, the buffoons, have managed the impossible and this doesn’t say a lot for populations at large.

Television fantasy has been transmogrified into reality. I always try to give credit where credit’s due, so the couch potatoes deserve a big round of applause too. Regular visitors here will have noticed my brief review of Sydney Lumet’s insightful movie, “Network” in “The Mindset of Psychosis”. Without Jon Rappoport, I would not have heard of this movie, therefore I recommend readers check out his excellent work for humanity. His blog, you will notice, is a breath of fresh air. Free of “trite sentiment”, he focuses on the warts on the issues as every true journalist should.

“Network” (1976) demonstrates that even back in the 1970’s people were beginning to cross over; the signs were there. TV had been popular for less than two decades and already audiences were considering defection. Now circumstances are much clearer. There are either prisoners of false reality or those that have broken free, minds intact. One of the very first questions I ask new acquaintances is, “Do you have a TV?” I am heartened by the surprisingly high numbers that have overcome their dependence on false paradigms engineered by hypocritical spinners of evil. Many of those I have interviewed either do not have television sets or avoid commercial programming like the plague.

That’s a big feather in the cap for liberty, but there is still much work to be done. The bastards have us cornered with their responsible (sic) “information” streams on all sides. Consequentially, I have found most mighty thinkers have been brainwashed in some fashion. This is because information exchange is subject to peer review and that oversight has been contaminated by TV and numerous other mechanisms the Illuminati use to influence the way minds collaborate. Fortunately Jon Rappoport and a few other modern day sages not only recognise this, but also reveal the who’s, how’s and why’s in painstaking detail. The Memory Hole is another excellent resource for American current affairs and PPJ Gazette attracts some fine, genuine articles about matters of conscience.

In tune Americans know their statue that once oversaw the Twin Towers mocks liberty. No wonder; it’s French. It is no coincidence. The Rothschild’s epicentre was in Paris (the second empire created in 1868 to ridicule constitutional democracy and undermine Napoleon led to social unrest there which overturned it in favour of a new republic in 1875, the precise same year as the liberty statue was erected. 1868 was the year America’s constitution was reduced to a “corporate charter”) and they benefited commercially the most from the end of slavery (sic), so the gift was the least they could do. But France is in the news again only minutes after England (not Scotland) pulled out of the European Union. “Bombs and baddies” ISIS is allegedly behind the latest attack, but more on that shortly. The operation or psy-op (a trendy expression Israelites bandy around) has been used to punctuate terms for a new Marxist-fascist European Union (EU) to be: the phoenix that will rise stronger than ever from the ashes. Do I read this correctly, a superhighway linking US, EU and Russia is in the making? Ah commerce….

Out-of-tune readers need to understand the only true democracies are static organs that exclusively represent the interests of the people called constitutional monarchies (presided over by all-too-rare monarchs that are devoted conscientious instruments of power and certainly not slippery, divisive, selfishly arbitrating governments). Therefore, all republics, whether backed by constitutions or not, are undemocratic. The very reason republics came into being was to manage recalcitrant populations in the interests of commerce to squarely benefit land owners (a euphemism for corporate “slave masters”) to the detriment of the plebeians (a nice word for slaves).

Giving everyone identical portions of land would go some way to level the economics playing field (note: research Vladimir Megre’s blueprint for Ukraine), but, without privilege, strongest oppressors would become the new de facto controllers of the way things are until manipulating intelligence was able to establish social control measures. Therefore, the elites are behind the manufacture of classes systems geared to shutting out brainsandbrawn. Islamic fundamentalism is an aspect of that fantasy painted by the same basic brush. ISIS and other militias are props used to give make-believe the tingle of reality.

Historically it needed (English) Oliver Cromwell’s Commonwealth failure and the hastily implemented Bill of Rights to ballast a workable republic conceptrigged to reward advantage. France funded American “independence” (another sorry act of buffoonery) and both became unconstitutional dictatorships in 1789. Though some herald America’s constitution as a work of art, it was created to produce what we see today and what will be in place tomorrow. Kangaroo courts presiding over rogue justice have always been the plan. Those that abolished constitutional monarchy needed to confuse the people into believing things were fair when they were anything but.

If the failings had been anything less than deliberate, there would be sufficient recourse to ensure remedial liberty for all. Be clear, under the current systems of government, there is no recourse for liberty; only perpetual tyranny. Britain did not have a constitution because Cromwell’s Westminster System was sufficient to open the gates of heck. It has allowed law makers to vent their relentless irresolvable insanity on unsuspecting masses overseen by lip-service monarchs demonstrating those that lead always represent elites, no matter what they say or pretend to do.

Returning to France and the latest fixture for ISIS, this has been another 5-0 loss for liberty. The guys at Veterans Today are not perfect. They, like everyone else, have their foibles, biases, preferences. But if you are looking for sock it to metruth, that is one of the best start points for investigation into matters concerning political intrigue, terrorism and abject tyranny in general. Here’s what Kevin Barrett has to say on the numerology of the recent French Bastille Day attack that killed 80 and injured 120. Kevin highlights the true significance of purpose of the French “revolution” (and storming of the Bastille, the peoples’ last stand. I realise Napoleon “pulled rank” by making himself Emperor, but look that happened to him) more than adequately.

As we are in VT mode, I would also rate this valuable entry as worth far more than a casual glance. The French ISIS “psy-op” was all about shoring up the EU. It is worth elaborating a little more on the English pantomime counterpart. Ex. Prime Minister, David Cameron, was a protégé of Margaret Thatcher, who herself was ousted from power (13 year reign as iron lady) because she tried to pull out of the EU. A rather unpopular leader, as far as I can gather, “stay in” Cameron promised to step down if the people chose to vote him and England out of the European Union.

The result was going to be as obvious as Donald Trump’s toupee. Iron Lady “Mark II”, Theresa May, now vilifies Mrs T to lead the triumphant peoples of Rome, Troy…er, close enough. The ghost of Mary Queen of Scots offers a chink of light for vigilant republicans. Scotland’s proposed secession (breakup of the British Union and something Donald Trump highly praised) has allowed access to the EU by the backdoor. Backdoor politics is like “backdoor sex” (for those miss the pun, this equates to the word “perversion”), they say. There’s always plenty of time before the final pull out so anything could happen in reality.

According to just about anyone with fingers on the pulse, Putin is definitely the new Messiah, after Obama fell at first post. Whether he’s real, given starting revelations from his ex-wife, is another story. However, either way I can affirm he (or four ofthem) is one of the current “good guys” scripted for the peoples’ illusion (courtesy of the Illuminati). Curious readers are doubtlessly aware of my other blog where I reveal some my special extra-sensory abilities. After evaluation of ever-present energy fields (sort of livingbar codes), I can say categorically that there is more than one Vladimir Putin(s) presented as “Russia’s President” by various Medias.

Hitler’s measures visibly targeted homosexuals in NAZI Germany, but there are also other parallels. Whilst popular opinions governing “paedophilia” (generally speaking) are hysterically insane, caution should be rationally applied. Social programming, vested interests, the potential for “victims” to be deceitful and the general lack of tangible evidence must take precedence in fair society, when considering testimony, motives and verdicts even if we assume “rules” (i.e. what “defines” paedophilia) are fair. Currently that is not happening.

Russian troops (supposedly “the best in the world”: where have I heard that before?) can be anywhere, any when now, courtesy of the United Nations. If Russia has become the new “super power” designate, a coup against America under the guise of “civil war” becomes more plausible by the minute. Could the US Senate draft Russians in UN uniform to assist removing guns from the American peoples without their general knowledge? It is a thought that doesn’t bear thinking. Putin “cracks” started to show when he capitulated in the misinformation campaign about Syria’s “cholera” origins, which actually highlights how dreadful conditions are there for some people of the ground. It proposes a total breakdown of government services infrastructure in some places.

The following section was written in stages some time ago so I may have to interject the odd comment, passage here and there to give continuity a chance at prudence. Rather than trading punches or droning on endlessly about the ills of government and master planners, I strip things right back to historic essentials after World War II but mostly post 1970’s introduction of the Petrodollar concept. Oil is one of the linchpins that keep Israel, ISIS and the whole sorry game afloat so, from memory, the filthy commodity steals the limelight somewhat. Anyway, without further ado, here is the meat of my assessment.

Israel and the United States have sterling reputations for “playing both sides”. For evidence of US dealings the references on Google are so crowded it would take a lifetime to research them all. Here’s “poll position” but there are albeit unlimited information sources for those willing to undertake the marathon.

Capturing Israeli double standards, I have found two articles. The first focuses on Netanyahu balancing his “Zionist objectives” with the needs of the people and the other is an abstract on high-tech war games with US agencies never far away (See here and there). This stimulated my imagination to ask the unthinkable question; could the US and Israel be behind operations both supporting and attacking ISIS?

Lately (several months ago) new critical information transpired in the Russian mainstream. Do I hear that right; US military contractors are reaping “billions of dollars” off this ISIS phoney war? Well, that’s one half of the puzzle. Russia’s involvement deserves separate inspection, so I shall discuss the wonder boy Putin’s “role” per Zionism’s master plan. The best way to check who’s behind a war is to follow weapons which lead to the money. Buffoons do not have imaginations and the Syrian gravy train is very similar to operations in Iraq. One group rebuilds as another demolishes.

Jeff Rense’s website, in particular, is a bulletin board that lists pertinent, current international affairs links. Turkey perpetually hovers on matters concerning ISIS and general misery in the Middle East. In this case, Turkey isn’t “the turkey”, but a lot of the really juicy stuff has been cooked so lightly the bird is rendered inedible. Therefore, I refer to other, mostly unknown, sources too. For instance, not that long ago I met with a young Turkish activist, the son of a lawyer. He informed me that the epicentre of the notorious 1999 Golcuk earthquake was directly under the naval HQ. At that time their [truly] democratically elected government (in this instance they didn’t have the fake candidates we always have) was pulling out of NATO (although extensive searches of Google Corporation have revealed no citing).

Only months after 9/11, in November 2002, the current proto-Israelite sycophant, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, seized power under the ever watchful eye of Ahmet Davutoglu reversing just about all prior decisions made by the exiting government. Could Erdogan’s associates have been behind the prior earthquake that murdered 50,000 Turks? Long ago he ran out of puff in his support of the phoney-baloney (ADL backed) anti-Hitler movement and now is demonstrably comfortable with Zionism.

Painstaking researchers would do well to thoroughly determine how the latest airport bombing, bogus “coup” and other “initiatives” fit into the scheme of things. Perhaps you will start here. Pressing on, I would like to offer a short video that American war veteran Ken O’Keefe made prior to the Russian intervention:

David Icke may well pound the wakeup call, but it seems as though the sheeple are even more lethargic than those guilded instruments of power (Illuminati “New World Order”) had calculated. Netanyahu’s grotesque depiction of a large bomb “for” Iran seems about the correct vibrational frequency vernacular for the average global slave. Subtle, terrorist, World War III materialising out of acrimony in 1984 (reverence to George Orwell’s fabulous work) has given the slip to all but the most acutely tuned minds. Here’s the (mainstream) checklist of key events of that year (see how much happened in the Middle East).

From about 1984 there were an explosion of kidnapping’s in the Arabic regions, including the abduction of the Archbishop’s emissary, Terry Waite, 1987 (eventually released in 1991). Of course, Hizbollah and other supposedly Islamic fundamentalist agencies are never far away from brothers of evil, the CIA/Mossad pact. Prior to reading an illuminating article on Veterans Today by Gordon Duff, I had only really ever heard of the Muslim guerrilla army, Mujahidin. According to Gordon, Mossad set up a Communist terrorist group in Iran and it was responsible for the seizure of the US embassy in Tehran which led to the ill-fated response from Jimmy Carter deliberatelystaged to embarrass him (see here and there), in my opinion.

According to my cursory research, beyond Gordon I find no other information sources, but the detail is so important, it is worth highlighting. I quote, “For the next few years, MEK killed political leaders across Iran before fleeing to Iraq to work for Saddam”. He then goes on to say they became Saddam’s personal army and it was also they that administered the (questionable) 1993 gas attacks that arbitrarily killed 30,000 Kurds in Northern Iraq. Moving the clock forward closer to present day, Gordon outlines Israel’s strategy with Iran, which is so blatant, it’s obvious. “If you want to control the opposition, be the opposition” (something Israeli dissident counter-spy Roi Tov has also argued). Contemplating, I think of all those pally, bosom buddy meetings between our Great White Hope, Vladimir Putin and the universal tyrant, Binyamin Netanyahu. Aren’t they truly the odd couple or is this more of that “control the opposition, control the game” agenda?

Ok, here’s the punch line and time to unveil Gordon’s article which was composed in response to the then recent VT invite to a “Congress for the 17,000 Victims of Iranian Terror” in Iran. As co-sponsor Veterans Today was unable to be there due to the Iranian government’s almighty failure to distribute short stay VISA’s to attendees in a timely manner (deliberate ploy?). The hosting Habilian Association was set up to support family members of those affected or killed by terrorist atrocities of the MEK (or Mujahideen-e-Khalq). Remember, this is the terrorist group set up by Mossad as an indefinite and ongoing ad hoc “psy-op”.

Let’s face it the methods used to annex Pakistan with their version of the Mujahideen in 1958 has Zionism written all over it too, doesn’t it? Was the second most radically Islamic nation on the planet nuclear enabled as insurance against Hindu (a version of Zoroastrianism) India’s burgeoning global influencing populations? Will they be labelled as nuclear suicide bombers at the right time? Even so, Douglas Dietrich swears that the largest arsenal of nuclear warheads is not Israel’s supposed and aptly named Jericho weapons system but, rather, coveted by Taiwan. Politics run deep and no wonder China’s “ever present” threat hasn’t materialised.

So why were Anglican Christian pawn, Terry Waite, and others abducted? It was because Zionism precisely wants radical Islam to spread and their beguiled populations to swell (creating endless fodder for groups such as ISIS). Geert Wilders does a great job in publicising the fact, whilst insisting “Christians”, “humanists” and “Jews” are brothers of an identical [divide and conquer] cause. In fact, in opposition to contradictory mesmerised musings emanating from otherwise pure alternative news streams, Zionist ultimate objectives almost precisely match those of radical Islam.

Thus, Islamists are principally Zionists in all but name. Was the sacking of Medina any different to atrocities levelled against erstwhile lawful inhabitants of Jericho? Waite had been an instrument of British politics which ended with the fatwa against Salman Rushdie, whose book Satanic Versesempowering Persian homosexuals was shut down by Islamic tyranny (check Putin’s agenda again). Nevertheless, that was the smokescreen. Rushdie himself has spared no effort on cashing in on the politics, as revealed by tittle-tattle from socialite Padma Lakshmi. Real objectives of the intrigue are as clear as day.

The Board of Deputies of British Jews reviews the wording of all British laws to ensure they are not offensive to Jews in any way. Naturally any piece of legislation judged wholly and proverbially “anti-Semitic” is always marked “return to sender”. So the real reason for those sensational kidnappings was to give Islam almost joint status with the Jews via the Muslim Council of Britain. Rushdie, little more than a “prop”, was icing on the cake, because ensuing legislative censorship (subsequent banning of “Satanic Verses”) assured Islam had been seen to muscle in to become a political instrument of power that can and will affect British law making.

Zionism and Islam deliver “eye for eye” (if you’re lucky) fundamentalism. Sharia Law is an austere version of “Pharisaic Order”. Elite Zionists are all for a strong whip against the masses to keep them under control. Islam and, most instrumentally, “ISIS” are the raw face; ensuring deliverers of justice are blamed and/or targeted for actions radical Jews sanctioned and secretly applaud, of course. Once again, the reason Islam expands is that is precisely what the Illuminati brotherhood wants.

Taking cultural traditions, few criticise, or indeed are aware of, the open tradition of orthodox Jewish women wearing flamboyant wigs to disguise their natural hair. Are not burqas the more overt or, perhaps, in your face, honest, versions of this orthodox Jewish custom? Perhaps this has something to do with the belief in the strength of hair, after Samson, which was adopted as Christian practice and fashionable amongst early British kings until it was judged to be superstitious.

“Habits” (Scriptural veils) were worn by Christian nuns (in service to God) modelled on the Arabic hijab (women’s uniform comprising burqa and other items) after the medieval crusades. Romans, Corinthians and other epistles of Paul have turned Christianity into a mockery of Pharisaic fundamentalism that spits in the face of Jesus. The American Amish represent the moderate version of that “model society” even allowing the consumption of unclean pig meat. Are not the proponents adhering to radical Islam divinely insolent? If the koranic command “dress modestly” is to be taken seriously, why would religious (sic) Muslim women cover themselves from head to toe? Hardly inconspicuous and certainly not “minimal” attire; their “clothing prisons” make a global statement.

Zionism (fortress Earth) is globalism and for globalism to be universal there must be peace on Earth. According to Pharisaic Scripture, the Messiah will herald universal peace. Obama was a candidate and has quietly seceded the United States to United Nations brokered Maritime Law. He hasn’t time to “complete”, so Putin is being groomed as the man of the hour (whenever that hour may be) and universal saviour (anti-Christ?) by various so-called “Truther” movements. Truther movements are the voice of the Puritan (another meaning of Pharisees) Christian orthodoxy and observe all wishes of Zionist planners. They are as pro-Putin as anti-Catholics and paedophilia, so the sane would be wise to tremble or begin rapidcontingency plans.

There have been numerous indicators, subtle legislative oversight administered by the Duma, that can I go as far to saycategorically state Putin is an extension of New World Order? Probably not, but no better example of where our friend-of-Zion stands on truth and censorship can be found in this Jewish Telegraphic Agency article issued May 2014. We are not privy to which of the numerous narrative lines have been selected to endorse the advent of the so-called (and possibly inappropriately termed) holocaust, but we know in Putin’s Russia fraud and deceit are now diktat. Putin has delivered his jackboot to the face of truth and, thus, this friend of Netanyahu ranks as the most dangerous man (or “men”) on the planet. My scepticism is surely vilified by the total absence of due diligence applied to propaganda caking promoting lies about the far more substantial Russian purges that mercilessly ended the lives of up to 100 million mostly Christian Aryan Slavs.

I did send an unanswered e-mail to Levashov, after reading his book, as he had used the intriguing metaphor that the she-wolf (i.e. Russian peoples) had turned. Back in 2011, Putin was beginning to shine as a pseudo-Messiah, but I felt then, as I do now, he was a fraud. I wanted to find out from an educated Russian, someone in the thick of things, whether Putin was indeed a wolf in sheep’s clothing (compared to, say, Adolph Hitler, whose name literally means wolf shepherd) or misjudged by me. Now, courtesy Nicolai’s tragic demise, I shall never know the answer. But, the truth (as far as I am concerned) is plainly obvious, and that is Putin is a devious snake slithering himself to poll position all the while playing the globalist’s game under the loving eyes of Binyamin Netanyahu and other Israelite “old guard” Zionists.

He is no people’s saviour. He is a manipulator in soft costume coveting vials of poison. Given his unremarkable (according to mainstreamers) humble beginnings as the “grandson of a lowly chef” (a chef that, at least, attempted to poison Rasputin for influencing the king), it is odd that the family has passed on the given name and surname to preserve that lineage. Why would a lowly cur do this? Vladimir means “powerful leader”. Putin, on the other hand, might translate as “whore”, though it is more likely to be a derivative of the Russian word “poot”, which means to prepare the way (Messiah). Long form, Vladimirovitch, has the precise same meaning as Vladimir, so I deduce his name was not merely a strange coincidence of fate (For more background on Putin’s ancestry see here).

Neither was it “fate” that Lenin’s given name matched Putin’s aptly validatingplanned historic outcomes. According to traditional accounts, Lenin had been hijacked by highwaymen before cruelly seizing power, so, once at the helm, he made the target and eradication of mafia gangs a priority. The culprits were possibly never caught and the vanguard went on well into Stalin’s reign. His creation of gulags (slave labour camps) for criminal businessmen saw droves of privateers scooped up as well. Unsurprisingly, these prisons became the gestation grounds for new crime hierarchies with various honour codes (usually represented by special tattoos) separating the various factions.

Stalin, an enterprising man, put this fodder to good use in World War II when things were not going well against Hitler. However, cooperation between the factions led to breaks in the honour codes. Predictably, after the war, gang disputes, known as the suka (bitch) wars, erupted. This was not the only reason. Apparently, Stalin had made lavish promises to recompense wartime services which remained unfulfilled so hostilities continued until his death. The use of Crime Gangs as “influencers” can be seen in many places about the globe. US naval presence in Thailand’s Pattaya is unofficially courtesy of Chinese and Thai triads that “run things”.

Privateering in Russia can be traced back to at least the 1700’s with charismatic tales of enigmatic figures of the style of England’s Dick Turpin. However, mafia enterprises spread to Europe and the US from 1970’s courtesy of totalitarianism Brezhnev-style (spookily coinciding with the invention of the Petrodollar). The exodus of opportunistic Jews into Russia under Brezhnev, spurred on by his “five year plans” (like the US globalism one 1971-75 which saw the creation of the Trilateral Commission) rationalising agriculture and so on is hardly noticed by “historians”. Pro-Zionists crow about a general tolerance towards Jews as one the highlights of communism only to be blighted by Stalin’s sensational purges. 1991 Perestroika and Gorbachev’s exit saw an explosion of mafia enterprises that went up to state government level. Out of control rogue commercialism gradually began infecting foreign industries. That’s the Russian style.

Before I explore Russia’s involvement in Syria, here is a detailed evaluation of the timeline (pertaining to key events) constructing the origins and evolution of ISIS/ISIL. We have to go back to 2003 and the formation of something called the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI) which appears to have been an adjunct to Mossad created “Mujahidin” (that has been terrorising Iran from the “Petrodollar” 1970’s, remember). Sponsored by Israel (after oil control negotiations turned sour), Al Qaeda in Iraq (quintessentially “ISI” or the “Mujahidin” in drag) was used to destabilise Saddam Hussein’s powerbase. Cordially mainstreamers, in rare moments of sanity, have confirmed Zionist sanctioned terrorists were his primo target, though they are deliberately foggy on “details”.

Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi was the original, CIA trained, leader of ISI who came to light in 2004, although, until October 2006, the group was generically only called Al Qaeda in Iraq (a CIA branding). Under this new guise, Abu Omar al-Baghdadi was referred to as emir or “acting caliph” by the authoritarian regime. Whilst the framework of power mimicked political instruments, controllers were nothing more than insane terrorist thugs. These people are hard to control (even by Mossad) and a few broke rank, such as Abdullah al-Janabi and Abu Ayyub al-Masri and they are now “wanted” by the same instruments that enabled them. Prior, Saddam Hussein had been reputedly CIA (with Mossad in the wings) trained, taking leadership by force.

Adding further credence, messeur’sFix-it Dmitry Medvedev and Sergei Lavrov had been circling Syria like patriotic vultures since 2012 and prior, in Medvedev’s case (when the Pentagon report came to light). Reputedly, Assad had fervent indirect negotiations with Israel throughout the 1990’s (or earlier) to exit Syria with dignity and it was Israel that was not having a bar of it (though no specific citations have resulted from painstaking research, this an interesting topical read nonetheless; see here). We must not assume Assad has behaved in ways that have been beyond reproach. Early in his leadership term he unsympathetically flexed his muscles against the people. It cannot be stressed enough. All players, whether good or bad, are scripted for the game.

Power broking fat cats lounge in plush hotels serviced by whore mongers well away from trouble, so they don’t care how many and who is killed just as long as it isn’t them. It is a shame no enterprising “do-gooder” has figured this out yet. One day virtue might deliver sound reasons for applauding measured targeted violence, but now we can only hope. Instead of vigilant defenders of faith we have an endless conveyor of mainstream headline sirens screaming drivel aimed at enflaming puerile masses into fomenting flagrant cultures of ignorance in ways, given the mindset of the bone idle proletariat, that are hard to shake. Generally putting the fear-of-God into Syrians not exposed to “action” and others that learn of the real horrors of war, the globalist/Zionist cartel has a singular stark message: “Don’t mess with us or we’ll give you a jackboot in the mush”.

It is fair to say, given mammoth sized information portions served up by Veterans Today, Global Research and other less prolific resources, we can piece together a pretty realistic appraisal of the objectives of all this, i.e. who’s behind the ISIS mess and so on. For instance, here’s a Global Research article that’s particularly compelling (although I disagree with the Dutch diplomat’s slant view on tarring the name of Islam, are you with me on this MT?). In my humble opinion the powers are preparing the world for what to expect from Islam when Sharia Law becomes Universal Law (though perhaps not as flagrantlyinterpreted as it is currently).

Laws themselves are regularly made only to be loosely enforced. Who smokes pot? Authoritarian regimes manufacture tyranny by ensuring consequences for all transgressions are not only followed through (acted on) but also pursued vigorously via every (or any) possible means (which might include turning the general public into an obscene “crime stoppers” style conspiracy of religious spies and snitches). Islamic peoples now have the conspicuous contradictory reputation of being a “mercifully” tough bunch of “mothers”. Ironically that was the old Israelite way too (prior to the reformation of Israel). On one side were a people dazzlingly beautiful and the essence of moral probity. The rest were disgraceful calculating hypocrites that would go to any lengths in order to confuse and deceive.

Saudi Arabia has an enormously bad and horrifically long record of crimes against its own people (See more from my friends at GR) which adds credence to the assertion that the Wahhabis (royalty) are of mixed Israelite blood. Let us not forget, that omnipresent proto-Judaic leadership of Turkey has not only been behind ISIS every step of the way, but also instrumental in enabling the mayhem as well. Sound hypothesis points to an Israel-Saudi Arabia-Turkey chain of command coordinating cloaked Middle Eastern military affairs. Impoverished Yemen and Palestinian ex-pats in Lebanon are commonly used as ground forces cannon fodder backed up by Egypt’s torturers.

Historically, Saddam’s gassing of the Kurds in 1988 seems to be an evidence-free act of wilful propaganda disguising an alliance between Turkey and Iraq (both favouring radicals free moderate, secular societies at the time) that ostracised unwelcome peoples (i.e. Islamic “nutcases”). No wonder the Kurds wanted their independence after the collapse of Iraq. Regional politics in the lead up to the creation of ISIS is vital to gauge an understanding as to bigger picture motives; motives that are at the heart of Zionist-globalist ambition. Big picture determines, as I pointed out in the introduction, that ISIS is a transient incidental. In other words, ISIS can disappear as fast as it appeared should “politics” determine it.

Another article I can present as evidence liberally exposing the real agenda behind ISIS et al was hot off the press at the original time of writing, but is now looking rather tired andold news. Here we see a right royal puppet and Putin’s merry band of Muppets at work. Oh I still think they would look so good in traditional Lincoln green! In line with Israeli logic, Saudi Arabia (with classy export products such as Osama Bin Laden) makes all the actual decisions for the “Middle East” as protectoratemasters. Assad and other Syrian stakeholders were nowhere to be seen at Putin’s “negotiations” pantomime. Mind you, apparently Israel’s leaders have never actually directly met with the Palestinians “in charge”. And that’s how you broker lasting “peace”; with results as transparent as the agenda.

Zionists trust the Russians and the Saudi’s to look after their best interests just as Elmer Fudd attempts to snare Bugs Bunny: puppets and Muppets completing the scripted cartoon. Even so the Russian involvement seems to be changing the face of the war. Hiccups in strategy, as to be expected, are met by booming silence from the globalist’s corridors of power. Putin seems to be projecting himself as a Messiah with teeth, vaguely, but I hate to burst the bubble for the wishful thinkers. Anyone that loves Putin, look away and don’t click on this link (an old one that discusses activities from 2011) about that giant gas pipeline stretching from Syria to Russia worth $ billions. Ah commerce….

If there is any doubt where the thinking Russian people stand on their [God given] rights we only need to refer to the great 19th century Aryan poet, Fyodor Tyutchev. His “To the Slavs” (1867) beggars the question to Mr Putin: have you addressed this, sir?

“Long ago on European soil,

Where falsehood grew luxuriantly,

Long ago with the learning of the Pharisee (Zionist),

A dual truth was created,

For them – law and justice,

For us – violation and deceit,

And antiquity reinforced,

Them, as the inheritance of the Slavs”

No, not as according to Mr Megre (another Vladimir) and the Crimean activist simply known as “Anastasia”. Incidentally Megre is very similar to the English word meagre, which also means “humble”. Perhaps fate is saying do you choose between meekness and pomp? I know which path Jesus would have chosen.

Whilst I don’t tar all Israelites with the same brush, let us never forget evil needs anonymous henchmen and lots of them. Compliant working classes are at least as much to blame as those wielding power. Jon has released the nasty Genie from its awfully cloudy bottle for detail reveals that those parts of the Golan Heights that Israel stole from Syria back in 1967 contain the massive deposits of hard to get at oil. Old form dies hard. The mangy mutt hasn’t learned any new tricks after all.

I would like to end this segment with a final message that a retired American officer has directed to the Pentagon. Enjoy the movie:

Just as with everyone else not born into money, I have to ghost as a slave to survive. Eating is an expensive requirement but, frankly, to follow breatharian systems, in my view, surely removes the greatest fundamental living pleasure of all. Consumption of food and liquid has been the major highlight of my existence. On the other hand, taking a scrape of raw brains from downed opponents (a macabre armed forces tradition Douglas Dietrich highlights) or devouring the still beating hearts of innocents (a feature of ISIS terrorism), to me, is devoid of anything that resembles bliss. Anyway, the point is, or was, I am presently working full time to survive and that has slowed progress on research and writing. In recent weeks Paris, Turkey, Russia and the CIA/Mossad pact, of course, have featured big time, so I would like to begin with a little video. I can’t remember if this one’s about Charlie Hebdo or the other Paris event, but…..same deal:

Moving along, we covered Israel in the last segment, so this part I would like to define Zionism, but before I do that a whole heap of other stuff has cropped up that really deserves an airing. Take the interesting recent revelation of Turkish President Erdogan’s intimate connections with the ISIS/ISIL (yes, I know, I’m as confused as you) brass, or, supposed brass. Then we have Paris and theories as to the purpose of the obvious false flag staged terrorist attack. Was it to coerce France into NATO (Zionist Pentagon Inc.), impose a version of the Patriot Act on the French people or to ram home “Climategate”?

To understand Zionism, you first must accept that nationalism is separate from spirituality and always has been. The concept of a fortress (Sion) world is nothing other than nationalistic utopianism. Whether the globe is “secure” or “insecure” does not reflect on sincere belief systems. Insincere ones demonstrate an absence of beliefs. Most recently, I have been particularly obsessed by etymology. “Belief” is a classic example of how meanings have been twisted to reflect the opposite of truth. Assertions, allegations and opinions are not beliefs. Yet, that, for the large part, is the only evidence required as an expression of faith. Except for nationalistic Judaism (and Islam to some degree), believers merely need to claim they are party to one religious brand or another to be unquestionably accepted by all as valued creed representatives. No one reads books anymore. Everything is on the cover. Everything has become branded concepts. Not so, I must say, is the case as I battle the very difficult book, “Legends of the Phoenix” by Alexey Trekhlebov (the cover is non-descript). Aside from his devotion to Russian/Atlantean supremacy, he makes some staggeringly good, well researched points. Included is a quote [supposedly] by Krishna:

“Spiritual qualities bring to freedom, whereas demonic ones paralyze”

Interesting, eh? What was I just saying about nationalistic control versus true spirituality? Is not control a type of paralysis? Trekhlebov also illuminates the Vedicdark Nav principle, which can only be appraised as a version of the “ISIS scheme”, equating to harnessing/managing/manipulating parasitic evil from the realms of darkness. I explore the Jewish Passover analogy shortly, but let me reinforce the punch line now. How anyone can celebrate the indiscriminate slaughter of human beings by God, heck only knows. Conscientious Jews know Jericho presents a demonic Achilles heel an eternity wide. After excising chunks of Deuteronomy, Leviticus and a few other pungent texts, Judaism might become spiritually redeemable, but for the alleged fact of history, Jericho.

Demon is an interesting word too and a prime example of how Zionist sympathisers have turned good into evil. Checking the origins, Greek “daimon” meant benevolent or benign nature sprite. Thus modern twisted etymology has been used to dissuade and ultimately destroy any participation in (anything but) demonic pantheism. Though there appears to be no relationship between demon and demos (Greek for “people”), the shared stem does have a subtle common link. Latin “demo” means to “remove” or “take away”. We, people, draw on (take) the resources of the Earth all our lives. Democracies are the unification of plunder; build on principles of mob rule. By that token, ISIS/ISIL is merely a symptom of the demonic nature of man; professionally sanctioned by chaotic usurpers (Pharisaic Zionists). Thinking of potential remedies/solutions to this, and given an insistence on instruments of power, only a constitutional monarchy that championed the moral fortitude of the people (i.e. as a flexible active organ) could offer effective representation. Of course, emphasis on “could” is so strong I think it would be too extreme to be possible.

The Zionist mindset

Before I give a brief history on the objectives of Zionist versus Rosicrucian Order, I am drawn once again to those spirited debates with my rabbinical colleague. Each April, we discuss the Passover. Isis, the Goddess of darkness, would hide (under cover of night) willful assassins to do “God’s bidding”. According to the fable, all Israelites daubed their dwellings with the blood of lambs [of God] and for that they were spared the wrath of ISIS. Regardless of galvanised Jewish nationalism, celebration of barbarous atrocities openly declares an inhumane god in its defiling blasphemy. As everything must, ultimately, be the summary of a single presence, any form of attack on anything else theoretically, at least, is an attack on God (see my book).

To see how Zionism has catapulted into action the above Passover sentiment, here is a Zionist “form guide”:

The first link I have selected, appropriately titled “the French Connection”, lists considerable numbers of atrocities “in the name of Zion” for 1944-48 by the Jewish Stern Gang (who finally assassinated Swedish diplomat, Count Bernadotte on September 17, 1948). It is the summary of a report prepared for Dr Ralph J. Bunche, UN Mediator for Palestine (Bernadotte’s replacement).

Many years ago, I somehow charmed my way into a passionate liaison with a well-connected Australian female (who will remain nameless). It so happens, as sheer luck would have it, that her ex-boyfriend (whose name I sincerely forget) was ex-Mossad or had represented some other Israelite special forces unit. He was too paranoid about the promise of attacks from renegades so I understood the union was a brief one. I was informed that, in moments of delirium, he revealed to my, then, girlfriend, that “Palestine is supplied all weapons by Israel through French intermediaries….and if the people knew they would lynch the government”. Where have I heard that before?. That wild card,France, keeps bobbing up like a bad penny.

A brief history of Zionism versus Rosicrucian Order

We have to go back to the time of mythical Atlantis to understand the dynamics that have ultimately forged the duplicitous, bi-partisan politics of the modern age. Create as many labels, brands, types as you like, but it is always “us” versus “them’ (or the other). Historically contextually, the Tower of Babel tale from the Biblical book of Genesis is wildly out of place. The short passage actually referred to a long period of development that perhaps commenced 30,000 years ago. It led to the creation of all nations and most languages today. Though the hallowed texts fail to harpoon the truth in glorious transparency, I can add that the towers represented the rose/cross impenetrable citadels and subsequent policies of banishment. Nikolai Levashov talks of roaming “derelicts” (the fallout from the destruction of Atlantis metropolis) emerging as new leaders in “Russian History Viewed through Distorted Mirrors” (2007). These were the mysterious “Aryans” that plundered India but all mysticism overlaid on the Dravidian cultures, surprisingly, is theirs. Sanskrit, for instance, is a version of ancient Russian. Nevertheless, at some point in the development of old Atlantis order, a philosophic split between those that wanted to engage and those that were simply intent on plundering has casted a dim pall over civilisation.

A significant section of the final part of Levashov’s book is devoted to explaining the realities behind Zionist communism; a thinly veiled attempt at enslaving humanity with view to ensuring directed labour and other resources are available and ready to satisfy any whim of the exalted leaders (extended industrialist oligarchy). The man power behind ISIS/ISIL, for instance, is an excellent example of this type of cultivated resource. We all should know by now that Vladimir Lenin was a failed lawyer, only with experience of a handful of court cases that were all spectacularly lost (similar, in some ways, to Franklin Roosevelt). Russian Bolshevism, I have mentioned before, was funded by Rothschild’s Inc. via a posse of newly created Federal Reserve bankers (the same ones’ more or less funded Adolph Hitler to the detriment of the American people). Ignoring Levashov’s observation that all Russian Presidents have either been white (both parents) or black (via the maternal line) Israelites, I wonder why no one questions America’s real motive in attacking French Indo-china (Vietnam) to progress the “War on Communism” after China was ignored by President Harry Truman. Korea became one of the operational satellites to conduct clandestine activities between East and West in secret after “terms” were organised in 1953.

Nevertheless, string pullers are always clearly Zionist and this cloaks an absence of spirituality promoting willful atheistic industrialism. Judaism, from the sacred perspective, is for suckers too. Details on the copper serpent and the Hebrews’ connection to Easter, denial of Sophia, and why Samael was offered the Torah as the “chief of evil spirits” will have to wait for another day. Then there’s the enigma of that French Merovingian Messiah. If I could conjure a simple statement that might summarise the overall objectives of Zionism, it would be – create nations and control them. That, my friends, is immigration. There are neither countries nor borders without the tyranny of nationalism.

Rather more importantly, I have discovered an article that finds the heart of this debate – control of the Pentagon (or larger Military Industrial Complex). Of course, the great event that supposedly changed history was 9/11 (although I think history was well on its way after the Oklahoma City Bombing). Once you control the Pentagon, you control everything (see here and there). We know 9/11 was on Pentagon’s 60th anniversary of foundation day so everyone (except minions and a team of auditors) was away (with the fairies). The only casualties/deaths were of that Bill Clinton’s ill-fated team of accountants investigating trillions of dollars in Pentagon fraud. Andersen Consulting’s calculated demise was down to fraud deliberately sending a message to any accountants that investigate the Pentagon to expect retribution demonstrating the vicious, narcissistic payback methods used by these career criminal “powers that be”.

Note: I would suggest Jimmie E. Cain Jr’s “Bram Stoker and Russophobia: Evidence of the British Fear of Russia in: “Dracula and the Lady of the Shroud“” makes excellent reading for those interested in the historic development of last century, including information on how the British East India Company (cotton trade link) partially morphed into the US Pentagon. It is interesting that Dracula has all the behavioural hallmarks of the extra-dimensional mammalian Pteroid Draco. Ex. Pentagon Chaplain, Colonel Michael Aquino reputedly tried to set up a pact with the Draco (euphamised as “Satan”) for the military (similar to the objectives of Hitler’s Thule Society). A progression of this theme prompted the creation of the Temple of Set.

Conclusions

I had originally planned to conclude this article by establishing a link between Latin criminal gangs, such as the Favelas, and their US counterparts with the ISIS sponsored terrorism in Mexico. However, unexpectedly, I found there to be no similarity whatsoever, other than the obvious drug trafficking connection. The consistencies in the methods and development of US versus Latin drug gangs do suggest a common, coordinated controller (or puppet master) has manipulated injustices against impoverished (predominantly ethnic) population groups. Explosive effects seen from the [what can only be described as] parallel development of numerous cross-cultures share so many similarities it leads the impartial researcher to conclude, “There ain’t no smoke without fire”.

Racking my brains as to the real point of the ISIS/Mexico connection, I came across this startling article (if that’s the right word). I cannot vouch for the accuracy of the account or source, but the first observation is the great Jewish centre, New York City, isn’t on the list – odd for an attack list of supposed Islamic fanatics. Living with Persian refugees, I have been immersed in their culture for over a year and this has given me a good understanding of the Farsi artistic perspective. The photograph depicting the ISIS militants is so flourishing; given the styles I had seen in numerous other Persian illustrations, it could only be Iranian. Thinking aloud, I had a “eureka moment”. If ISIS was to process a barbaric attack on the peoples of the United States of America, what retaliation would come at the expense of the Middle East? More importantly, would this diabolical (the Boston marathon has shown they are well prepared to kill Americans for effect) false flag lead to a nuclear strike on Iran and all out Armageddon? Another “incidental” that may be hardly worth mentioning is that, reputedly, ISIS/ISIL has attacked or been blamed for terrorist activity in just about all Middle Eastern countries. Yet, according to my sources, Israel has never been attacked once. An “Islamic fundamentalist” group that only attacks would-be Islamists – isn’t that odd?

Ok, that may be old news, but readers should remember I began the bare bones of this dissertation back in April and a lot has happened in the meantime. Besides, this old evidence is hardly water under the bridge, and goes well to shaping a clarity that might be fogged by present day theatricals. I have a feeling we have already exceeded the 10,000 word promise and I have barely reached the halfway point. Next segment will explore the “interests” behind global politics and their corresponding evolution of a system that has become ISIS/ISIL. See you soon.

Back in May, when the scales tipped over the 5,000 word mark, I decided to break my dissertation on “who’s behind ISIS” into roughly equal parts for ease of reading. It now looks as though all parts (maybe six or more) are destined to be weighty tomes in their own right (considering additional information contained in the numerous external links that complete the account). This segment feels certain to exceed the 5,000 word mark too, but, as the French say, “C’est la vie”. There is some big news, a most important announcement, from a very unusual source which confirms that October 2015 was indeed the trigger of a visceral, synthetic World War III all over possession of Ukraine. That is why Putin has found his way into so many recent headlines.

Some abettors may asset my criticism of the Ashkenazi, in particular, as overt Racism. Therefore, I need to inform reckless referees that insist on judging the book by the cover only a number of my close friends and associates are Ashkenazi. Let us not demean the creative thought processes to vulgar crassness. No, not all Ashkenazi Jews are Zionists. Most, like everyone else, have been exploited by the few. So let us not stoop to murky depths of Orwellian conspiratorial bipartisanism with bad “labels” agin’ good “trademarks” – “cowboys and Indians”, “cops and robbers” and so on. On the other hand, short of a few very well camouflaged Haredim, there have been next to no vocal protests or otherwise from those that deserve, nayshould want, to have their names cleared, my friends and associates included.

POOP Network Commandants

Regularly, I pick up anonymous compliments of the style “at last there is someone who says it as it is”. The truth comes with barbs too and I have been wounded many times, so if you want to show me some shekels in appreciation, I would be very privileged (Go here for the donation/book purchase links. Oh hell, we missed Hanukah, but be a devil and bless the winter solstice). Let’s face it Israeli politics has been a sorry state of affairs. How could conscientiousness hope to gain any traction with, ex war hawk, Ehud Barak on one side of the Knesset and profoundly active war hawk, “neo-con”, Binjamin Netanyahu, on t’other?

Not only was the first part of this dissertation given an airing by Conscious Life News, but it attracted a vital response by way of comments. I recall one in-tune vocalist proposing ISIS stood for “Israeli Secret Intelligence Service”. Some of those ever present shill’s may have been part of the Professionally Organised Obstructive Persons (POOP) network. That’s not a real thing, by the way, because I just made it up. Formed from combined Sumerian Gods (simulating an ongoing balance of power, discussed later), Israel is very real, though. Everyone knows it is a country, although perhaps some Americans might not have figured it yet (given one time 25% reportedly responding to a pop poll answered that Australia was “somewhere in Europe”). Cruel may it be, but my rule of thumb is nine out of ten can’t tell their arms from their elbows, so, given this breadth, harvesting a crush of comments would expect to reap very few wise gems. Ozzie Thinker makes it clear he is not going to stand for any nonsense, so very little poop finds its way onto this humble sanctuary. Conscious Life News is a whole different kettle of fish, so I was blessed by the response.

Ignoring the fact that their selected homelands (and there have been many, not just that dusty Middle Eastern hideaway) always seem to be occupied and deeply loved by existing inhabitants, attachment to one’s homeland is the root of all patriotism. Given the right attitude, patriotic causes can only be regarded as noble and worthy aspirations? Personally, as a Universalist, I do not practice patriotism, but I acknowledge without those distinctive ethnic flavours this world would not be the diverse haven for experiential excellence it is. A more in depth history of Zionism will be addressed next segment.

Central Intelligence Agency: A Zionist Front

Background history

What things become is not always what they were created to be, but it is important to review the background history to understand the issues. It is by no accident that 1789 is a monumentally important shared date demonstrating a pivot change in the direction of politics and management of the people. America became a formal republic (prior it had been a constitutional democracy, but this was nothing like ancient Vaishali) and the French peoples’ revolution catapulted into motion. Except, true historians know it was no peoples’ revolution, but that is a whole nother story for another day. Both also share the unfavourable outcomes that each ultimately, economically, was a monumental disaster.

To understand why the CIA was created, you have to consider the motive behind reestablishing the rogue (I give my case for this later) national state of Israel. Some are confused by the “Promised Land” mythology. Israel is no promised land but, rather, an administrative centre for “order” (Zionist protocols) and principled legislation. Maree Moore is not the only one to identify Ireland was selected as the land of milk and honey, per Moses’ dream (this link is particularly interesting as Eva Draconis’ chronicle of discussions with what she calls “The Orion Beings” outlined “human abductions” were off limits [only] in Denmark against a specified deal with NATO). The Celts, ultimately, proved too strong for the Philistines, so Anglo-Saxons had to settle for England, first.

Lands with “promise”

England expanded to absorb oppressive unions constituting the British Isles which also grabbed a chunk of Ireland for good measure, segregating its peoples (later marked by the Zionist/Rosicrucian, Protestant/Catholic apartheid). Saxons, Moore rightly explains, is a “phonetic” abbreviation of Sac’s sons. Given the natural Irish language is 40% Hebrew, their long established tin mining operations in Cornwall (linked to the Phoenicians) presided over by none other than Joseph of Arimathea at one juncture, the Celtic druids are evidence of a much earlier Jewish exodus.

Indeed, Alexey Trekhlebov makes some interesting points in his book, “Legends of the Phoenix” (2014). According to ancient (Russian – hence Putin’s role play as global corruptvirtuous Saviour)

Little leprechaun Putin

Slavic-Aryan wisdom dating back to the first thoughts of man, green eyed red heads were devout spiritualists and made good priests (when religion could be taken seriously), whereas black haired silver-grey eyes denoted a military character. These men made great leaders. Of the two Irish archetypes, one is the Trojan tall, dark haired arrow and the other the mousy, short (often plump) auburn haired, emerald eyed leprechaun. Jewish heritage (long confused by power hungry oligarchs), therefore, must go right back to the days of Atlantis and they presumably have precisely the same roots as the Vedic Russians. Indeed, in light of Genome Project revelations, geneticists are in a quandary as to what “Jewish” is.

When Great Britain finally failed as acting Promised Land for the Jews (particularly after the Norman Conquest of 1066), Christopher Columbus was commissioned to find new lands suitable for the pure (Puritans). Thus, the United States of America became the fresh land of milk and honey in 1789. Two hundred and fifty or so years later, after the continent was finally prized from the natives, Adolph Hitler was persuaded (via the 1933 Haavara Agreement [26th August]) to restock Palestine with German Jews ready for “takeover” there. Ignoring the nonsense about a pointless war bunker suicide that, at worst, benefited his enemies; for augmenting the interests of Zionism, he was protected until death, from memory Bolivia 1976 (according to the KGB), by the Israeli spy agency, Mossad.

Earlier, the USA pretty much dictated terms at the Treaty of Versailles (which set up the right conditions to launch Hitler, who was funded by Levite bankers under the Federal Reserve banner that sucked $840M in gold out of America to ultimately cause the 1929 Wall Street Crash) and they did the same at the end of World War II with initiatives such as the Nuremburg Trials (amply matched by Stalin’s show trial purges against the brotherhood). Capitalising on the misery of that dark period, American President Eisenhower became the salesman for something, inexplicably, called “the Holocaust” as justification for the forced removal (without compensation) or execution of the natural Palestinians and other non-Jewish nationals from the larger part of Palestine (this word, ironically, originally meant “free” or “no man’s land” from the Aryan Sanskrit).

The creation of the Military Industrial Complex

A crucial part of the 1948 illegal occupation, now known as Israel, was an outsourced military. The Pentagon’s, which had been established as an “idea” of closet Zionist, Franklin D Roosevelt, May 1941, construction began September 11th that year (heralded by fake terrorist 9/11 – an attack on the American people crafted by their own government) as a predestinated new military administration. I discuss alien connections in later segments. The CIA was another Roosevelt initiative. In 1942 he appointed William Donovan to the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) and this led to the intelligence agencies formal structure in September 1947. An early objective was “control” of mainstream Medias (Operation Mockingbird), so when Allen W Dulles took the helm in 1953, at the end of the Korean War, most of the major news outlets were under CIA influence.

It was at this point, Influential German ex. NAZI’s (or perhaps NAZIO’s would be a truer representation of the 1920 alliance of National Socialism and Zionism) were given safe passage and “new lives” in the USA, courtesy of the CIA (Operation Bloodstone). I think it is worth determining whether acronyms, such as NAZI, ISIS and so on, were coincidental or calculated. It is implausible to presume Initials purely come as an accidental consequence of word creation. The official reasoning behind the NAZI initials is gibberish and even attestation to forces governing stigmas is less than plausible (i.e. strategic critics), emphasized by the fact that it was after Hitler’s 1933 rise to power (because of the Haavara Agreement) that sentiment changed to reflect the appreciation of the Zionists. The Franklin Union (of) Casual Knitters does not exist today because of its unmentionable partner acronym. Therefore, it is also no accident of fate that the certain Ashke-NAZI Jews are behind most forms of Zionism and it was their interference that created the concept National Socialism (a version of Marxism) in the first place.

The same rules can be applied to the ISIS and ISS (to inflict Goddess style terror from darkness of space) initials. “Impact” of acronyms is almost always seriously considered by globalists and that would have been so for decisions as to the appropriateness of “CIA” (Counterfeit Information Agenda?) too. Anyway, returning to the topic, until Nixon, the CIA was mostly used to protect or further the political ambitions of the industrialists, but, in my opinion, part of the reason the agency had been established was as insurance against Israel’s too great an influence over US sovereign affairs. The Pentagon might need to be obstructed. Let us never forget FDR’s May 1941 admission, “You know I am a juggler, and I never let my right hand know what my left hand does. I am perfectly willing to mislead and tell untruths….” The plan always was, slice it as you may, to impose Marxism by the backdoor as the ultimate model for the enslavement of man (demeaning the only real exit, true communism or libertarianism, as a Marxist rebrand) to the advantage of the industrialist globalist cabal.

Money, power and oil

Of course, history has witnessed (and been corrupted by the influencers) the CIA involvement with the assassination of both Kennedys, but the agenda changed with George HW Bush’s appointment as agency director after Nixon. That was the final nail in the coffin containing US sovereignty. Israel, via the Bush Dynasty, now owned the Pentagon and the CIA. Failed lawyer (as was Russia’s Vladimir Illyich Ulyanov aka “Lenin”), Roosevelt has a very bad record with regards ethical provenance (this source barely scrapes the surface) so he seems to have employed creamy subterfuge as his weapon against the plebeians, just as Vladimir (the right to rule) Putin does today. Indeed, there was a rather hot winded episode, egged on by uncompensated World War I veterans protesting from “tent city”, in which Major General Smedley Butler is infamously publicised as being part of a planned coup d’état to overthrow Roosevelt 1932-33.

Washington Tent City 1932

In fact the pantomime was used to disguise the dismal failure of the gold standard and capitalism; per se, highlighted in some detail in Butler’s powerful thesis, “War is a Racket” (excerpts here).

Roosevelt sneakily moved the greenback off the gold standard, of course, in June 1933 (just after Hitler’s Zionist power pact), but, for the most part, the Bretton-Woods system acted as an interim standard from 1946 until Nixon finally stopped the rot in 1971. Radical new economic 25 year plans ensued 1971-75 which saw the emergence of the Trilateral Commission in 1973 under the tutelage of David Rockefeller (many Tri-lateral Commission members hold ministerial governmental portfolios in the US today). Israel was created, once more, in 1948, when the Brett-Woods accord was in effect. Only shortly after Nixon had formally abandoned the gold standard it played havoc with the US dollar on the foreign exchange.

As all oil trades were transacted though US dollars (a separate discussion), the so-called petrodollar spectacularly wobbled in 1973 and again in 1979. The 1973 date was the more important (remember that is when the Trilateral Commission was set up) as it backed off Israel’s Yom Kippur War (which smells of a Zionist “op”). The important Jews along with their Bush Dynasty friends had lots of fingers in the oil pie via US/UK trading corporations. OPEC action netted a giant payday for the Globalists. H Bradford Westerfield’s book “Inside CIA’s Private World: Declassified Articles from the Agency’s Internal Journal 1955-92” is an interesting read (considering what hasn’t been omitted. This excerpt touches on their involvement with OPEC from 1973)

The Israel Connection

Though I am well aware of the Biblical misinterpretation of Genesis 32:28 “Then the man said, “Your name will no longer be Jacob, but Israel, because you have struggled with God and with men and have overcome”” (NIV translation), Israel is a combination of the Babylonian Gods Isis, Ra and Amen/Amon/Amun (Hebrew lightversionEl is the stem of Elohim – “manifest gods”). They [propagandists] may well say that Y’Israel means “God contended” (or God overpowered?) but the reason so much global iconography heralds from Babylonian tradition is that Israel is Babylonian (Phoenician) tradition. Israel’s very existence according to strict rabbinical interpretation of the Torah is heresy.

Pharisaic perversity, pagan Star of David, has evolved the manipulation of the Atlantean divine triangle [though the real symbol represents the trinity of causeways that contain/express existence, I like this artistic opinion too] creating a bonded star (very different to Bhakta Yoga tradition) promising eternal conflict that is now appropriately seated on the flag of Israel as evidence to all who know what it means in context (Opinions here or there).

Though not mentioned in this fine article, most (if not all) of the Bush clan are members of the Babylonian Brotherhood, which links in with invisible Draco Reptilian mind-control mechanisms (touched on here from the deep historic perspective – here and there). Skull & Bones, Priory of Sion and even, what has become of, Rosicrucian Order have ultimately been party to a singularly purposed masonic agenda scoped by the Babylonian Brotherhood. Later we will see how the Muslim Brotherhood has been reduced from Arab Spring renaissance to proto-Zionist totalitarianism. They are behind all chaos, regardless of the vivid imaginations of the mainstream (and many alternative) Medias. If the Buddhists adopted a terrorist attack strategy (as has been done “in the name of Islam”), be in no doubt that all plans are the brainchild of Zionist entrepreneurs and their extensive, well financed, control networks.

Ra, of course, is the God of Light and Isis is the (Moon) Goddess of Darkness. Therefore, it is no coincidence that the International Space Station (ISS) was named so (i.e., to imply control from the darkness after Reagan’s Star Wars concept, as exampled earlier). The Islamic State of Iraq & Syria (ISIS) was initially labeled Islamic State of Iraq & the Levant (ISIL) to confuse thinkers, but the conspirators have big egos and enjoy flaunting their power to ignorant slaves, plus they needed to be sure they had won. We can only assume that confidence in goals met was that strong, they could let the moggie out of the bag in 2012. This extremely violent and inhumane group of terrorists is allegedly controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood, although perhaps that is malicious “rebranding”. Should not a violent anarchistic arm of Islam be called the “Islamic Brotherhood”? If the plan, by malicious powers, was squarely to destabilise the image of the moderate (peaceful) Muslim (just as the NAZI’s did to the Diasporas), might not the reaction create some ambiguity [on what is meant by moderate] whilst removing [absolute] radical hostility towards “brotherhood groups” such as the Babylonian Brotherhood too? The exact same German “walking dead” term for maltreated Diasporas was given to the Muslims; surely no coincidence?

Of course, in the modern age, the way power structures are presented by the mainstream poses some ambiguity as to who controls what. There, for instance, has been a fervent campaign (ongoing for many years) to imply that the United States is an “autonomous super power”. All too frequently brisk differences of opinion between it and Israel’s foreign policies play out as extended melodramas between key national and international tabloids. There are some uncomfortable realities that have not been entirely buried by Google and other “establishment sponsored” censors. Some question whether AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) runs US foreign policy (see this groveling article supporting the Zionist “cause” (sic). Arab American Mantiq-Al-Tayr is not a supporter [warning: contains disturbing images]).

For clarity of vision, researchers must go right back to the beginning; a past which shows settlement of the United States of America required conflict and broken promises, a violent takeover, with the sole purpose of usurping American native Indian populations’ territories consequentially reducing them to homelessness on their own soil (let us never forget that Israel did this to the Palestinians too against the instruction of rabbinical orders, so motives have always been globalist/industrialist and not religious nationalistic). Protestant “Puritan” Pilgrim Fathers had travelled to the great continent to set up a new land of milk and honey, or their “Promised Land” (according to Scripture). Puritanism is so radically Pharisaic in character; it may as well be called pseudo Judaism. Ironically, the other radical interpretation is Islam.

That hostile takeover of America to create the Promised Land has been shown to be very much an act of Zionism, given the relationship Jesuit middle men had with Columbus, Lutheran Protestantism, Illuminati order of the New World, May Day, 1776 and so on. Zion (or Sion) means fortress (in Hebrew) and there has been a long, predictable history of violence associated with forces attached to this order. Turning the clock much further back, we can review the mechanics of ancient Roman civilization as globalist utopianism. Indeed, as long as 2,000 years ago, some compellingly blame Nero’s Roman arson (Great Fire of Rome 64 AD) on disgruntled Zealots (a past version of Zionists) which ultimately saw violent Roman retaliation with the siege of Jerusalem 66-69 AD. The Romans interest in and takeover of Judea in 63BC deserves detailed inspection; given the relationship with “Arab” Herod’s at the Jews expense. There are too many other stones to upturn right now, so that discovery tour will have to wait another day.

A little farfetched, maybe, but even considering the choice of fire [in particular] as a popular method of destruction is worthy of examination. Remember things are often done for not particularly obvious reasons and that is why the average person is mostly blind to political motives. The old “purgatory” concept uses fire to bring a small piece of “hell on Earth”. That is why Catholics burned witches at the stake (drowning offered a form of “Baptismal cleansing” when the sinner passed over). The theme continues with infamous Guy Fawkes and his failed attempt at reducing England’s parliament to a bonfire. Ironically (or maybe not so), one member of the small band of agitators was named Pierce and is a direct ancestor of the Clintons. Of course the most topically recent event that concurs with Roman arson symbolism was the torching of the Reichstag in February 1933. After this (April of the same year), one of Hilter’s early demonstrations of leadership power was the (PR stunt?) incineration of the unapproved books allegedly targeting Jewish book stores and authors. Vladimir Putin loves censorship too.

Traditionally the Reichstag fire was blamed on communists. Here is a possible reason. Aryan-Slavs passionately upheld ideals of libertarianism as exquisite virtues of Vedic philosophy, so many were connected to the various idealistic communist movements before they became polluted by toxic Marist-Zionism. Slavic peoples, in general, saw international defeat and castigation after the 9th century when their last bastion fell and that is the origin of the word “slave” (note: Latin “esclava” has a more modern etymology, servant, servitude stem being the more ancient term). “Slav” means either “glorious” (slavniy) or “fame” (slava). Hitler’s “worship” of the Aryan type was reverse PR (one of those “big lies” he boasts of in Mein Kampf), just like his reversal of the Swastika symbol of Vedic enlightenment. Let us be frank (maybe using Anne Frank’s malnourished tuberculosis death at Bergen-Belsen concentration camp is a good lead in), Hitler was not against the Jews, per se, just the cosmopolitan enablers with conscience activated. Those, mostly Diasporas, were the ones he targeted. Was Hitler allowed to be sarcastic when he said he hated the Jews but loved the Aryans?

So after the Reichstag fire, Jewish (supposedly “Levites” – “above the law” and see here for an explanation of the confusion) Ashkenazi bankers could rubber stamp Adolph Hitler’s power authority. They were also originated from the Ukraine and known as Khazars by that heritage. Khazar means “wicked, disgusting” from the dark ages Aryan Christian word pogani. The meaning changed by medieval times with heretic preferred after the German (from Greek) which signified “outcast”. Apostate, from the Greek too, was also used as this means “revolt/defect”. Unsurprisingly they are a perfect match for the colloquial translation of the term “pharisaic”. The Khazars are the modern version of the Pharisees and that’s why Ukraine wants its “independence”.

Their trade with Hitler, highlighted earlier, was evidenced by the Haavara Agreement in exchange for Federal Reserve (established by the Zionists 1913-14 to coordinate a global New World Order precipitating World War I and the 1917 Russian takeover to test austere controlled enslavement of the masses) gold. History tells us the Schiff/Warburg engineered contract was so detrimental to the New York Stock Exchange it caused the Wall Street Crash (1929). A decade long Depression was only savedby world war (courtesy of the newly empowered Hitler). There is no doubt WWII was planned and engineered by the same Jewish hierarchies as part of the final solution for the enslavement of man. The predominant outcome from this global turmoil was the recreation of Israel, validated by a vapid holocaust, which means “sacrificial burnt offering”.

Global tyranny administered by the US per Israel’s vision

Since the same basic parties had established the land of Israel, pretty much every US President has worked with and, in general, given favour to Israel. President Obama has been called the most “anti-Israel President ever” (Mein Kampf style?). To establish for myself whether this is true or not, I have scoured the internet in search of any anti-Israel material/quotes from Barack Obama. All damning remarks have been excised from the account, so allegations seem to substantively rely on journalistic license (exaggeration or out-and-out lies). Even going way beyond Google page 10, the only remotely anti-Israel quote I have found is “The only way for Israel to thrive as a Jewish and democratic state is through the realisation of an independent and viable Palestine”. Though this seems like a borrowed quote, or something very similar to earlier sentiment, I understand why some Israelites take umbrage.

Researchers need to investigate the creation of Judaism and key figures, such as the mythical Moses (was he the Babylonian scribe Barach/Barak?). Under the extreme Pharisaic interpretation of Law, God (El/Yahweh) is above the Law, Levites are exempt from the Torah and other Scriptural references (which encourages some to question whether they are Jews at all, if religion is determined by faith), Jews [must] religiously follow the Law and non-Jews (Goyim) must both follow the Law and exist only to serve the Chosen People (Jews). Being Goyim (officially), I have a big problem with that. Researchers quickly learn that the reason Obama’s allegedly “anti-Semitic” quote is anti-Israel is that he has dared to suggest empowerment of Palestinian slaves by validating their assault on “rightful” Israelite land (per Zionist beliefs).

Better comprehension of this reasoning can be gained from an analysis of the fall of Jericho, which saw no land settlement by Israelites of the time. Under “God’s instruction”, they left with three wagon loads of treasure at the expense of the occupants. It’s a moot point, but in regular debates I have with a Rabbi colleague, we are edging closer and closer to the philosophy that Pharisaic extremists believe all habitable locations of the Earth’s surface is the extent of Israel and they only allow Goyim colonies out of the goodness of their hearts. Would that make the Goyim lepers? From the spiritual perspective (by rabbinical interpretation), leprosy is a problem with the skin which might surely be symbolic of afflicted, wrong skinned Goyim in light of Jesus’ attention? As mentioned earlier, the “Jewish” bankers that funded Hitler were all reputedly Levites. However, doing more than a little digging, I find not a skerrick of evidence (just supposition) that proves one [of those bankers] is a true Levite. Indeed it is my opinion they were/are all common and ordinary Ashkenazi Jews.

Much can be gained from the double impact of published rogue sentiment via unknown, foreign journals. Here’s a made-up (fictional) example. Headline: “The Australian Prime Minister believes the Bali Nine (“heroin exporters” set up through an Australian Federal Police sting to diffuse the Schapelle Corby “customs debacle”) deserved to die” after giving the Australian public broadcast “crocodile tears” and “outrage” over Indonesia’s handling of the matter. He, per this fiction, made the comment in print in some French Lady’s magazine called, shall we say, “Moi”. I believe, as much as I admire his writing style, that Roi Tov is an agent for the interests of Zion. He exists to lifelong translate the true meaning of ludicrous Israelite political sentiment for the dumb Goyim.

Of course any agitator must be kept in a virtual prison (as Pharisee Paul tells us) ever threatened by capital punishment by those upholding Pharisaic order and these, predictably, are Roi’s alleged perpetual circumstances. Along similar lines, in general, I have a problem with so-called “conspiracy theories”. Whereas many revelations offer great insight to readers, they each, invariably, contain their own propaganda slant. Last year, in the spirit of truth solidarity, I changed my internet explorer default page from MSN to Jeff Rense’s bulletin board. However, I found the change fostered such an increase in personal negativity that my default is now blank (soon to be replaced by Conscious Life News, of course) for health reasons. The point being is, absolute negativity can be destructively overwhelming (i.e. who does Rense really represent?). My joking style, I have been told, “powerfully enlightens”. That’s why the, ahem, three brave people that regularly reference this blog are presumably empowered by it.

None, in office, dare publically criticise

To discover anti-American sentiment from Israel, we only need to turn to their current Prime Minister Benjamin [Bibi] Netanyahu. As a failed furniture salesman, his experience with the US was not a good one. From that vein perhaps readers can understand the hostility. Nevertheless I cannot see any right-minded American accepting this:

“It does not matter what you do. America is a golden calf and we will suck it dry, chop it up, and sell it off piece by piece until there is nothing left but the world’s biggest welfare state that we will create and control. Why? Because it is the will of God. This is what we do to countries we hate. We destroy them very slowly and make them suffer for refusing to be our slaves.” (1990)

Netanyahu’s use of the enigmatic symbol “golden calf” is pivotal to my argument that Israel, Zion and ISIS are intrinsically connected. In fact this is the Babylonian fertility symbol that links the Roman/Greek “Philistines” with Israel’s Zionist Pharisaic elite. Paul McGuire has a very good understanding of how this encapsulates an imperialist tradition, in part, hell bent on plundering the land of “milk and honey”.

Crop Circles offer more than meets the casual eye

Crop circle collage courtesy of Red Collie, the maths genius

I promised some big news. It has come in a rather unlikely, controversial form. Though I have failed to locate the site, arguably somewhere in Brazil, a Crop Circle appeared before the fateful Halloween Russian plane crash in the Egyptian Sinai desert. There is a reference to the twin propeller plane (note two concentric circles), CBS News and the colour scheme even suggests “sand”. But the humble (Zeta grey being sanctioned) pictogram offers so much more in its warning for humanity. Please check the photo carefully to understand the clever symbolism.

An ellipse (outer circle) is representative of the rise/fall of the human soul (a soul under attack from negative elements). There are two rings which signify transition or stages and the central one is perfect and significantly smaller than the damaged outer human soul. It can only mean the pure either break away or are saved by some arbitrary power. The “propeller” doubles as a lotus flower lily which is symbolic of rebirth. There are four uneven petals, representative of cooperation or some kind of pact between different factions only covering the “chosen few” (in the small circle). In light of the sorry state of the human soul network, CBS is the so-called “evil eye” of misrepresentation. It is generally believed the rise and fall of the human soul can only end with apocalypse and the plane crash, whether planned or accidental, is going to be used as the trigger to stimulate a visceral World War III (that began in 1984 under the people’s noses while they were sleeping) and possible Armageddon simply to justify the hostile repatriation of Ukraine as Khazaria. Logic points to a symbolic Russian defeat, but could Messianic Putin “win” and still grant the Ashkenazi’s sovereignty at the Russian Ukrainians expense? How would wise Solomon have reacted?

So there you have it. Next segment will discuss Zionism and its historic evolution in more detail. I rattled the tin in front of the Jews (Ashkenazi included) earlier. Now, in the spirit, of Christmas, Ramadan, Diwali, Losar, Songkran and any other festival convenient for my purposes, here is another donation plea to the Goyim. I tried being homeless last Christmas but (other than two fellow bloggers) no one bothered to respond with care. This time I give you something in return for your donations, so not only do you achieve nirvana (that special warm glow from helping out your fellow man that volunteers a huge amount of time to the salvation of humanity) but there are a number of gift options depending on whether you like reading or listening. Or, then again, you can simply donate because you feel it is the right thing to do. Visit here, scroll down and you will find all the juicy details, PayPal and other links. Thank you for reading; go empowered.

The embryo of this dissertation began as a humble response to a Conscious Life News editor friend, Robert O’Leary, whose painstaking research had uncovered connections between ISIS, criminal gangs and extra-government agencies right under the very noses of the American peoples. These unlawful enterprises seem to be the rule rather than the exception and I go some way to formulating an extended basis for consideration. The writing project began in April this year, but, as political realities emerged, information snowballed. Split into a number of installments for convenient viewing, the finished article is still very much a work in progress as its 10,000 words have only really on touched on the tip of the iceberg.

I could, for instance, have given some time to the rather strange set of circumstances that led to the formation of the Irish Republican Army (IRA) in 1919 after the First World War. Links with US organized (government sponsored) crime were never far away as was revealed by the notorious 1929 St Valentine’s Day Massacre involving Bugs Moran’s North Side Irish Mob in an altercation over Detroit moonshine. Though I find no responsible sources suggesting the Irish Mob and the IRA were parts of the same network, to me, it is inconceivable that there were no puppet masters issuing or manipulating higherstrategies, given the Kennedys’ [admittedly spurious] role as illegal liquor distributors. That mob connection blighted the family right up to JFK, of course.

The creation of ISIS and other, frankly, narcissistic, terrorist groups is mostly about leveraging successful psychologies to underscore the funneling of willing dupes. As a subscriber of the great John Rappoport’s blogs, I am forever intrigued in what he proposes is reality creating. Aided and abetted by institutions, the mainstream (and most of the alternative) Medias, freelance and paid experts, have constructed a false “reality” and the veil of deceit is now so thick, justifications for lies are scarcely offered. Our once beautifully reasoned intuition has been transformed into a bloated, bulging, synthetic monster, albeit devoid of logic. So much so, swelling groups of proud misinformation givers parading as news streams even pledge their allegiance to Zionist ambition in the open.

We know why they (the powers) are behind the fake alternative news. Ultimately, they intend to create standards, outlawing alternative information sources (backed by the lies they created), to impose universal censorship for the benefit (sic) of the people. Many of you “truthers” made this so, by refusing to read or check out your sources, but you mostly mindlessly soldier on championing every scat of ignorance. Of course the mischief makers are clever at mixing misinformation with pure, invariably tweaking contents to deny the truth. Zionist ambition-ists, in all but name, show their intent/status by screaming like banshees without apparent cause. Evidence free submissions regularly plague popular, otherwise useful, resource points such as “Before its News” (which some aptly parody “after news is done”). Naturally, I try and avoid those pot holes, steering the hazardous disinformation fields as best I can. Nevertheless, my comments section is there for readers to draw my attention to any bogies that have escaped these tired eyes. Comments are read and heeded and any validated criticisms will see appropriate amendments made to texts by way of restitution. You can make a difference on Ozzie Thinker.

Doubtlessly, considering the long time lag required for the development of this article, additional inserts may need to be added to earlier sections to ensure conclusive continuity. Rather than removing erstwhile defunct parts, I shall act as editor and add “notes” as and when any inclusion warrants it because some may see value in witnessing my journey. At this stage, it is unclear whether the post will appear (in part or fully) on Conscious Life News, but I thank them for offering me the opportunity to submit and herald them for being my inspiration and driving motive behind this extensive account. Whether it collects dust as yet more of the same old emotional balder dust disparaged by aspiring pharisaic atheists is up to fate. I can humbly say that, as a masterpiece for the renaissance of propriety truth, there are lesser monuments with far loftier reputations. If it has the effect of limiting the cycle of events and actions that contrive this, what should be, wonderful planet and celebration of diversity, then fate has blessed me more than any accolade dare suggest. If you feel this is representative of the truth, then do your duty and spread the word far and wide.

Introduction

I was perusing the extensive and ever-revealing Conscious Life News archives, when I came across Robert O’Leary’s excellent article on ISIS. Tossing and turning overnight, in grim reflection, I woke up with a start. Jumping out of bed in a flurry, I immediately felt the need to put pen to paper. Battling weary eyes, sincere research notes flowed throughout the day. Suitably inspired, in my energised sombre state, finally I contacted Robert, first congratulating him on his fine work of real journalism (in an age where so much fraud is passed off as “news”) and then asked whether I could expand on his evaluation. “The more the people know about this,” he replied, “the better”.

Robert’s article explores the detail of some of the symptoms, so a different approach might shed some new light on the murky contents by way of prognosis. I do have a few personal experiences I can reveal that might highlight how far-reaching the terrorism and racketeering agenda spreads. Back in 1997, I worked for a property development company in Sydney. One of my team members was a man in his mid-thirties who was noticeably vital and full of life. Inquiring as to where this energy came from, I was told that he had become a rock star, unknown to me, in the US in the mid 1980’s and “earned $10,000’s each week”. “Had drugs or some other high life excess ruined his chances?” I ruefully pondered. It turned out, though; a single event changed his life and ended his illustrious career. Queuing at a Los Angeles cinema complex with his beautiful betrothed (remember, he was a rock star), a drive by shooter pierced her heart with a single bullet. His was eternally broken.

Crime; organised by whom?

Of course, this version of “honour killing” (if that’s the right expression) came to light more recently with the shooting death of tennis stars Williams twins’ older sister, Yetunde Price. The registered nurse and beauty salon owner was gunned down by a gang member whose sole objective was to prove he had the guts to kill someone. Perhaps I’m “old school” but, to me, killing in this fashion doesn’t demonstrate guts. It affirms psychopathic cowardice. Nevertheless, seeing beyond the sensation, the event highlighted age-old territorial marking by the notorious Crips and Bloods gangs. The legacy of these criminal organisations is so well-structured from a past harking back to days when the Mafia ran America, the inquisitive researcher is drawn to question whether “Higher Powers” are involved in some way. Foundations, researchers sometimes identify as far back as the 1920’s (prominently in Chicago), argue were actually nothing more than a consequence of land settlement, or that is the common opinion.

Gangs are the counterpoint to police “ever presence” and the script has been carefully tailored [via official sources] to ensure the elites’ perennial plan is neither succinctly revealed nor obstructed. Terrorist armies have been such a meaningful force against police units in America at least since the turn of last century; the “public shield” has steadily expanded (often to the detriment of the people, in general). It should be little wonder that just about all modern criminal enterprises, law enforcement agencies and judicial structures are controlled by the same, shadow, arbitrary bodies. Thus an evaluation of modern history is tantamount to uncloaking these foul stakeholders that capitalise on the demoralisation of social ethics and corruption of political organs.

A significant change in the make-up of American gangs, for my research, began in 1981, with an estimated 52,400 (mostly ethnic) young gang members (according to former Attorney George Deukmejian’s departmental statistics) at that time in one state alone; the State of California. Is it a coincidence that, ex-governor of California, Ronald Reagan took presidential office in the very same year? Though many sources argue that George H.W. Bush was “acting” President throughout most of Reagan’s terms, highlighted by very public knowledge of his early dementia signs, this appears to be more to shine focus on elite ambitions (cultivating the Bush Dynasty) than parrying with stock realities of the time.

Cathy O’Brien talks about some very nasty and rather unbelievable practices, including ritual murders, drug running, organised paedophilia connecting the Bush’s, Clinton’s and Reagan (check here or there), but, most importantly, orchestrating the Bush dynasty. Her nonsense smells of a set up skulking stagnant cyberspace. Show me conclusive evidence and I will change my view. Of course, the well-read should be aware of the real Bush/Clinton bloodline connection via the Pierce family name, but who knows about Obama’s relationship? Read that article carefully, because it turns out Dick Cheney is connected to nepotistic order as well. Pedestrians instinctively know the game now as we predictable have an unconvincing Jeb Bush pretending “for President” in the lead up to the 2017 changeover of administrative control.

Years ago I attended a lecture of the ex. military librarian, Douglas Dietrich. He informed his wide eyed audience that when his run against Bill Clinton was starting to look as though he was going to win the Presidential race, Ros Perot met with the Bush’s to understand the “intricacies of top level US affairs”. Perot was a hardnosed trading billionaire oil baron so (though reputedly God fearing) was not shy to the dark side. According to Dietrich, he left the meeting in pallor, such was the corruption. The Bushes had structured organised racketeering for every conceivable vice (including a few he never knew existed). Perot decided to get out while the going was good and that is why unknown Bill Clinton won the presidency [according to Dietrich]. Cathy O’Brien’s salacious gossip includes accusations of a giant cocaine ring emanating from Clinton’s Whitehouse so there might be a seam of truth in what she says. There are also ever circulating rumours that Cheney’s conglomerate Halliburton carried suitcase nuclear weapons (these were a “concept” that ex. President Clinton pushed for a while) and bags of heroin protected under his diplomatic cover.

Were some of these nuclear nasties destined for the sponsorship of pliable “trigger happy” rogue regimes (or Fukushima?) and some of the hard drugs designated for Somalia and other rebellious African nations? Control through war and narcotics can be evidenced in China’s two opium wars (1840’s, 1850’s) and America’s so-called Civil War (1860’s). Few are aware, in addition to the carnage, 400,000 drug addictions was the legacy for the US people (lest you forget). Opiate medication, Laudanum, conveniently was given restricted access in 1906 at the end of the Wild West. Drug-addled mercenaries used in Somalia and so on waxes familiar as a possible reinstated ancient Atlantean method of population control. Details of these tests and methods are best documented as part of the fallout from revelations on MKULTRA style enterprises. Watergate did nothing to prohibit these deranged NAZI style practices which, though no irrefutably demonstrative source can be found, are alive and well (according to the anthropomorphic field).

There are many, many references espousing to a power behind the power, sometimes euphemistically referred to as the “corridors of power” or “the powers that be”. For my research, I have found where there is global intrigue (turmoil), Israel always seems to figure in the picture somewhere. This piece began by introducing Robert O’Leary’s article, so I would like to focus on ISIS and the Israel connection next installment. In the meantime if you have not read this carefully, please do me the courtesy of respect and reread. Reference links are added for a reason. Please review them thoroughly. Remember I do this extraordinary work as an unpaid volunteer for salvation. For any questions, compliments or criticisms worthy of highlight please tender them in the “comments” section. See you soon.

Regular readers will note I have refrained from addressing the subject of violence, in isolation, until now. Other posts regularly expose brutal control methods; particularly those that review the objectives of Zionism and its paramilitary units, such as ISIS (See http://www.mintpressnews.com/zionism-and-isis-opposing-forces-or-two-sides-of-the-same-coin/199482/), but this one seeks to address the root of the problem. Violence is never fair. Gullible people have been conned into believing that ISIS is the disorganised product of one of the military arms of the Islamic brotherhood. Though now formalised in its own right as a political organ, Islamic Brotherhood has evolved out of a US marketing concept labelled Al-Qaeda (or “database”. See http://www.globalresearch.ca/al-qaeda-the-database-2/24738). It amazes me but there are still some that do not know the purpose and origins of this fantasy; which has ultimately been used to tag and smear any organisation (or, for that matter, individuals) that stand in the way of US agency domination.

Talk as I may about roguish politics, my post was actually inspired (if that is the right word) by an unresolved Facebook debate over “violence against women”. Whereas no one is more staunchly opposed to oppressive, aggressive tactics that lead to bodily harm than I, it became clear that the objectives of the Facebook exchange had nothing to do with violence against women (See https://unwomen.org.au/focus-areas/ending-violence-against-women). That was the excuse; the pretext. The real motive of intent of the lady that laid down the gauntlet was to promote her version of the current state of apathy celebrating pathetic peoples unable to defend themselves under the spell of myopic, dishonest laws. Occasionally, even I succumb to their (those dreadful, deceitful propagandists) illusion. Take the word debate. I look up its meaning in various lexicons and find only variations of “argument” (See http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/debate). The emphasis and point of engagements is missed. Where “debate” separates from vulgar “argument” is commonality and compromise are sought as consequence of sincere, considered discussions.

My Facebook “debates” were nothing more than semantics trades; political points scoring. Ironically, or perhaps not so, foul, dishonest Laws are sold and validated by semantics too (See http://jewsdownunder.com/2014/02/22/on-law-lies-and-propaganda/). Adding insult to injury, these vile excuses for reason are enforced by another brand of robotic human. Constabulary adepts are usually more dangerous than drug addled “soldiers” as they have delusions of [individual] grandeur. I once wrote, “Of these born killers, the cowards join the “forces”” to summarise the fundamental difference between criminals and crusaders. It is a form of greed that consumes the ego, when unchecked, developing into megalomania. These visible rabid wolves (drunk with power) are the “officials” in uniform that pave the way for “kangaroo courts” (See http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Kangaroo+Court) made up of jurors selected for their subservience and presiding judges of the right mindset. Tunnel vision determines the narrow bandwidth of permissible debate, error and interpretation. Our licensed to commit slander mainstream Medias’ gross tyranny is regularly pulled up for its sins, but never enough to effect change. Rather, law suits and attrition appear to be the sole objective of those pusillanimous “masters” (sic) behind the illusion.

Harken everyone; don’t fret. Without the people, the system would be nothing. Here’s an example of true grit. Just after I was born, my mother took the long walk between our village and the local town in order to procure much needed supplies. Upon returning, at about the half way stage, arms laden with shopping, a taxi sped past her through a large puddled area of road. Its driver, oblivious to all with cab occupied, had taken no care or attention of passers-by. The predictable outcome saw my mother drenched from head to toe. She made a mental note of the insignia and number plate and, as young as she was, informed the police with view to pressing charges. In those days, the courts at least attempted to arbitrate, so after several months our uncharitable Indian chauffeur was called to the dock. My mother, being honest, gave her testimony from the heart, unabated. The Indian fellow produced twenty witnesses, each, and without exception, offering versions of perjure. They had to be lying as none of them had actually witnessed the event. Though the court, in this instance, found in favour of my mother, it shows how “the system” could be manipulated, particularly, let us say, if there was an ethnic flavour to the judiciary.

It is only fair to consider the police in an arbitrary light. Let’s be honest, they have been presented in a pretty dim light thus far, but not all come with deactivated conscience. Indeed, there are, even today, a few brave, sincere policemen that try, against all odds, to do the right thing. But, how many times has a policeman fingered a potential criminal without the required evidence to back accusations? The Department of Public Prosecutions (DPP) is just another corporate power with strict targets desirous that quotas are met with persistent regularity. Those numerous grey area “maybes” are easily upgraded in lean times. Thus, even the good, sincere, honourable police rely on perjury exemplified by their individual characters/judgements. Similar to jurors and judges, tunnel vision is an essential attribute for any would be law enforcement recruit. If a suspicious looking male passer-by is black, over six feet tall and carrying a pool cue; super-strung hysteria may well concoct a violent crime in the making. “On duty” imaginations can run wild given the wrong or right character type, depending on the overall objective (always under pressure from those “quotas” I mentioned before). With added complicity from a disassociated, eager for scalps, leadership, our poor “mark” on his aimless walk to the club for a fun, recreational game of Snooker might end up jailed for five years after a plea bargained conviction for attempted murder.

Returning to my mother’s altercation, this is not to say all Indians are socially irresponsible, but as time winds on with creative journalists more and more detached from the truth, people have been told any fantasy will do over and over. Standards are set by the monstrous Medias and courts, whether people like it or not, dance to that tune. Sixty Minutes, Four Corners, Frontline offer nothing short of propaganda in documentary format (infomercials). Of course, if they champion your views, why should truth matter? I will tell you why it matters. It matters because violence always leads to attrition. If individuals launch warring campaigns that are baseless and, other than from the shallowest perspective, are truth free, crusaders can expect violent reactions from their foe.

Currently, according to the hallowed union (judiciary and Medias), the world’s worst evil is paedophilia (See http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/195861). However, I question, once we have agreed what a “child” is (See http://philosophytalk.org/shows/what-child and I split my sides laughing), whether children are being protected or persecuted by the lack of wisdom from the ever-widening witch hunts driven by lynch mob duplicity. Children, in my opinion, are being conditioned to become adults that appeal to the notion “sex is sin” (See http://biblehub.com/1_corinthians/6-18.htm). This is very bad indeed. In addition, isolating these so-called paedophiles, I wonder whether attraction to that which is forbidden motivates those that seek greater power than self. A superiority complex (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superiority_complex) could easily develop as paedophilia. Equally those that detest laws and the system in general might use it as a form of revenge. If basket weaving was outlawed, there would be basket weaving bandits. I personally do not see paedophilia warranting serious consideration though. As we are all aware, physical adults are given the label “children” because it is the whim of the skulking, timorous masters – “population control”, “religious”, “hormones” or whatever other gobbledegook they want to present as “science”. Control of humanity is the singular real reason (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_and_the_law).

It is impossible to do justice to “Violence Always Leads to Attrition” without analysing each word. “Violence” is not necessarily aggressive. There is also passive violence. In the case of women versus men, passive strategies are doomed to meet aggressive reactions. Passive violence might be classed as behaving unreasonably. “Always” never varies. We can say, whether it’s passive or active, violence will engage a chain of events. There is no maybe. It is certain. Of course, my use of “Leads to” denotes those “chain of events” which may be “the end” or, alternatively extended, prolonged, convoluted processes that simmer indefinitely. “Attrition” is generally regarded as weakening, but it can also mean sorrow or loss. There is no doubt violence will result in weakening, but counter measures might lead to greater strength of resolve. Tables turned, the victim may tower tall over a quivering attacker.

But what of arbitrary third party observers? Excluding lust for sport, a good fight, only degradation and sorrow remains. Was not, from the arbitrary perspective, violence wholly unnecessary given a reasoned, civil approach to negotiated communications?

I began discussions with ISIS. In light of our new vision; why have the Zionists created this vile, mercenary army named after the Babylonian Goddess of darkness? Firstly, they are determined to control for control’s safe and hang the consequences – Oedipus complex (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oedipus_complex). Nevertheless, the main reason ISIS exists is to manufacture perpetual global sorrow and degradation. It’s good for trade (See http://www.vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres9/BUTLERWaracket.pdf). Relatively few (thank goodness) have experienced the violence first hand, but the relentless Macbeth mainstream Medias have whisked a typhoon of hatred that covers the globe. By their account, everyone’s affected as it’s just round the corner, but everyone is also protected by the spineless, sorry “valiant” and “patriotic”, masters so pay your dues quietly and don’t fuss. But, you see, as with all other varieties of violence, there is raging attrition. The war doesn’t stop with the return of the vindicated aggressors – that’s when and where it begins. All those broken soldiers won’t put your countries back together again.

Has anyone considered that perhaps those phoney wars in the Middle East are partially designed to kill of any plausibly dedicated front against utopian tyranny at home? They certainly would not want any feasible force to counter the fulfilment of the degradation of your unconditional enslavement.