QUEENSLAND’S LNP MPs have been warned they could be putting their political future with the party at risk if they support Labor’s abortion decriminalisation Bill.

The Courier-Mail can reveal LNP president Gary Spence spoke with MPs about the looming debate on the Bill during a party room meeting last month.

It isunderstood Mr Spence did not specifically tell MPs how they should vote but he did say they could be putting themselves at risk of having their preselection to run again at the October 2020 State Election overturned by the LNP’s powerful State Council

[quote]QUEENSLAND’S LNP MPs have been warned they could be putting their political future with the party at risk if they support Labor’s abortion decriminalisation Bill.

The Courier-Mail can reveal LNP president Gary Spence spoke with MPs about the looming debate on the Bill during a party room meeting last month.

It isunderstood Mr Spence did not specifically tell MPs how they should vote but he did say they could be putting themselves at risk of having their preselection to run again at the October 2020 State Election overturned by the LNP’s powerful State Council[/quote]

Technology shaping humans, creating a hierarchy of humans from alphas to something way down in the Greek alphabet. Not “alphas” like that idiot Aqua keeps crapping on about, in BNW alphas are the most perfect human beings. No marriage—humans are manufactured, the woman do their “malthusian exercises” so they don’t get pregnant.

Technology shaping humans, creating a hierarchy of humans from alphas to something way down in the Greek alphabet. Not “alphas” like that idiot Aqua keeps crapping on about, in BNW alphas are the most perfect human beings. No marriage—humans are manufactured, the woman do their “malthusian exercises” so they don’t get pregnant.

HBS Guy wrote:It is the violence of a patriarchic theocracy, Sprint. Fertile women are a commodity, guarded and traded from household to household. Doctors who may have performed abortions back when it was still legal are hung by the regime. Putting out eyes, female genital mutilation because a woman was a lesbian so this way she would not enjoy sapphic sex etc. Women are not allowed to read and young girls are not educated in anything bar looking after a household for when she is compulsorily married to a Guard.

It is a dark and violent film, VERY unpleasant to watch so I do not wonder that you turned it off, Sprint. No blame for that/.

I watched it (on SBS streaming) and every time the ad breaks came on I would do something else for 10-15 minutes. I read the book as well. The reason is I have watched the growth of Gilead in the US: legal, safe abortion being forbidden, clinics closed. Not just abortion but all sorts of womens health services closed down. We have seen employers thinking they can dictate that their female employees cannot have contraceptives provided in the company health plan. We have also seen Repugs gerrymander their House of Reps electorates and, increasingly, disenfranchise voters, especially women especially colored and Hispanic voters.

Gilead coming by stealth. Here we have a Lib party chocful of Catholics with a happy clapper at the helm—and mutterings in some states of not decriminalising abortion etc. No abortion services in all of Tassie.

I would hate to see my nieces and great and great great nieces be made subservient, unable to decide on their reproductive health. My mother came from a family of ten. Don’t want that shit again, thanks. Mum’s feet are deformed—no money so she wore shoes that were too small for her.

So I watched it, second season too and will watch the third season too.

......................... I would hate to see my nieces and great and great great nieces be made subservient, unable to decide on their reproductive health ....................

Hence, I did not watch itI do not support such mistreatment of womenIt is a woman haters show.Take out the woman abuse, there is nothing else.

If anyone likes women, they should not support this show by watching it.

[quote="HBS Guy"]It is the violence of a patriarchic theocracy, Sprint. Fertile women are a commodity, guarded and traded from household to household. Doctors who may have performed abortions back when it was still legal are hung by the regime. Putting out eyes, female genital mutilation because a woman was a lesbian so this way she would not enjoy sapphic sex etc. Women are not allowed to read and young girls are not educated in anything bar looking after a household for when she is compulsorily married to a Guard.

It is a dark and violent film, VERY unpleasant to watch so I do not wonder that you turned it off, Sprint. No blame for that/.

I watched it (on SBS streaming) and every time the ad breaks came on I would do something else for 10-15 minutes. I read the book as well. The reason is I have watched the growth of Gilead in the US: legal, safe abortion being forbidden, clinics closed. Not just abortion but all sorts of womens health services closed down. We have seen employers thinking they can dictate that their female employees cannot have contraceptives provided in the company health plan. We have also seen Repugs gerrymander their House of Reps electorates and, increasingly, disenfranchise voters, especially women especially colored and Hispanic voters.

Gilead coming by stealth. Here we have a Lib party chocful of Catholics with a happy clapper at the helm—and mutterings in some states of not decriminalising abortion etc. No abortion services in all of Tassie.

I would hate to see my nieces and great and great great nieces be made subservient, unable to decide on their reproductive health. My mother came from a family of ten. Don’t want that shit again, thanks. Mum’s feet are deformed—no money so she wore shoes that were too small for her.

So I watched it, second season too and will watch the third season too.[/quote]

[quote]......................... I would hate to see my nieces and great and great great nieces be made subservient, unable to decide on their reproductive health ....................[/quote]

Hence, I did not watch itI do not support such mistreatment of womenIt is a woman haters show.Take out the woman abuse, there is nothing else.

If anyone likes women, they should not support this show by watching it.

It is the violence of a patriarchic theocracy, Sprint. Fertile women are a commodity, guarded and traded from household to household. Doctors who may have performed abortions back when it was still legal are hung by the regime. Putting out eyes, female genital mutilation because a woman was a lesbian so this way she would not enjoy sapphic sex etc. Women are not allowed to read and young girls are not educated in anything bar looking after a household for when she is compulsorily married to a Guard.

It is a dark and violent film, VERY unpleasant to watch so I do not wonder that you turned it off, Sprint. No blame for that/.

I watched it (on SBS streaming) and every time the ad breaks came on I would do something else for 10-15 minutes. I read the book as well. The reason is I have watched the growth of Gilead in the US: legal, safe abortion being forbidden, clinics closed. Not just abortion but all sorts of womens health services closed down. We have seen employers thinking they can dictate that their female employees cannot have contraceptives provided in the company health plan. We have also seen Repugs gerrymander their House of Reps electorates and, increasingly, disenfranchise voters, especially women especially colored and Hispanic voters.

Gilead coming by stealth. Here we have a Lib party chocful of Catholics with a happy clapper at the helm—and mutterings in some states of not decriminalising abortion etc. No abortion services in all of Tassie.

I would hate to see my nieces and great and great great nieces be made subservient, unable to decide on their reproductive health. My mother came from a family of ten. Don’t want that shit again, thanks. Mum’s feet are deformed—no money so she wore shoes that were too small for her.

So I watched it, second season too and will watch the third season too.

It is the violence of a patriarchic theocracy, Sprint. Fertile women are a commodity, guarded and traded from household to household. Doctors who may have performed abortions back when it was still legal are hung by the regime. Putting out eyes, female genital mutilation because a woman was a lesbian so this way she would not enjoy sapphic sex etc. Women are not allowed to read and young girls are not educated in anything bar looking after a household for when she is compulsorily married to a Guard.

It is a dark and violent film, VERY unpleasant to watch so I do not wonder that you turned it off, Sprint. No blame for that/.

I watched it (on SBS streaming) and every time the ad breaks came on I would do something else for 10-15 minutes. I read the book as well. The reason is I have watched the growth of Gilead in the US: legal, safe abortion being forbidden, clinics closed. Not just abortion but all sorts of womens health services closed down. We have seen employers thinking they can dictate that their female employees cannot have contraceptives provided in the company health plan. We have also seen Repugs gerrymander their House of Reps electorates and, increasingly, disenfranchise voters, especially women especially colored and Hispanic voters.

Gilead coming by stealth. Here we have a Lib party chocful of Catholics with a happy clapper at the helm—and mutterings in some states of not decriminalising abortion etc. No abortion services in all of Tassie.

I would hate to see my nieces and great and great great nieces be made subservient, unable to decide on their reproductive health. My mother came from a family of ten. Don’t want that shit again, thanks. Mum’s feet are deformed—no money so she wore shoes that were too small for her.

So I watched it, second season too and will watch the third season too.

“Kavanaugh referred to birth control ― something more than 95 percent of women use in their lifetime ― as an ‘abortion-inducing drug,’ which is not just flat-out wrong, but is anti-woman, anti-science propaganda.”

' .......... Is that dreadful hateful violent program still going ? ...... '

“Kavanaugh referred to birth control ― something more than 95 percent of women use in their lifetime ― as an ‘abortion-inducing drug,’ which is not just flat-out wrong, but is anti-woman, anti-science propaganda.”[/quote]

' .......... Is that dreadful hateful violent program still going ? ...... '

“Kavanaugh referred to birth control ― something more than 95 percent of women use in their lifetime ― as an ‘abortion-inducing drug,’ which is not just flat-out wrong, but is anti-woman, anti-science propaganda.”

“Kavanaugh referred to birth control ― something more than 95 percent of women use in their lifetime ― as an ‘abortion-inducing drug,’ which is not just flat-out wrong, but is anti-woman, anti-science propaganda.”

No, those are women protesting the appointment of a reactionary judge who will make the lot of women worse, remove their right to control their own bodies (Roe v Wade) be for more guns and so make the US a bit more like Gilead, a theocracy and patriarchy.

No, those are women protesting the appointment of a reactionary judge who will make the lot of women worse, remove their right to control their own bodies (Roe v Wade) be for more guns and so make the US a bit more like Gilead, a theocracy and patriarchy.

mothra wrote:Monk, you are a good man with a tremendous amount of respect for women. I hope you aren't hurt by Cods' nasty words. I know exactly your thoughts and feelings on the profoundly significant themes raised by this show and they are compassionate and entirely appropriate.

It was a cheap shot by Cods ... made with ignorance to do nothing more than wound.

I hope my opinion weighs more heavily on you. It is certainly more informed.

No, I was just angry that she made that cheap shot, especially as we had a fair bit of email correspondence so she would know Gilead is not my ideal!

[quote="mothra"]Monk, you are a good man with a tremendous amount of respect for women. I hope you aren't hurt by Cods' nasty words. I know exactly your thoughts and feelings on the profoundly significant themes raised by this show and they are compassionate and entirely appropriate.

It was a cheap shot by Cods ... made with ignorance to do nothing more than wound.

I hope my opinion weighs more heavily on you. It is certainly more informed.[/quote]

No, I was just angry that she made that cheap shot, especially as we had a fair bit of email correspondence so she would know Gilead is not my ideal!

Monk, you are a good man with a tremendous amount of respect for women. I hope you aren't hurt by Cods' nasty words. I know exactly your thoughts and feelings on the profoundly significant themes raised by this show and they are compassionate and entirely appropriate.

It was a cheap shot by Cods ... made with ignorance to do nothing more than wound.

I hope my opinion weighs more heavily on you. It is certainly more informed.

Monk, you are a good man with a tremendous amount of respect for women. I hope you aren't hurt by Cods' nasty words. I know exactly your thoughts and feelings on the profoundly significant themes raised by this show and they are compassionate and entirely appropriate.

It was a cheap shot by Cods ... made with ignorance to do nothing more than wound.

I hope my opinion weighs more heavily on you. It is certainly more informed.