You said: StrongAxe has 1,393 votes. Should he be President? Does he vote for himself? Hmmmm!...

It may be possible to vote for yourself (I don't know. I haven't tried). But I DO know that you can only vote for someone once - the system remembers your vote. So even if it were possible to vote for oneself, one could only do it once.

As far as being President, I have absolutely no desire for that. Leave it for someone with political aspirations and talent.

Boy oh boy won't any Non Christians who venture on here really be impressed with how you tear each other apart. Fine example you are giving how Christians should act toward one another in Love. Beloved let us love one another for Love is of God,he that loves is of God,he who loves not does not know God. You can get a point across without dealing in personal remarks and attitudes. Great Grandmother Darlene 1,God Bless

"Look who's talking! It was left wing radicals like you who gave us this anti-American traitor. Why do you continue to worship this guy who equates today's Christians with his muslim friends who behead Christians? Are you a muslim too?"---jerry6593 on 2/23/15

What's quite apparent in life ( & on this blog) is one can't objectively reason with drunks or lunatics. Neither are in their right mind.

...his life, Islam, communism and racist doctrine being the main ones.---Haz27 on 2/20/15

Your welcome. The liberal media hushed this atrocity up asap. Fat fluffy Sheep just grazed on, heads down. A female Canadian journalist after investigating his 20 year indoctrination in this doctrine, said it is like the jews voting for hitler. The only consolation is "sheep" are scripturally sheep. While not necessarily dumb...they are short sighted grazers without a Shepherd. They've allowed a wolf "mongrel" in his own words (see oprah wfry episode) to lead/eat/shear them. Pray for the "sheep" Haz, we'll do the same for yours.

Look who's talking! It was left wing radicals like you who gave us this anti-American traitor. Why do you continue to worship this guy who equates today's Christians with his muslim friends who behead Christians? Are you a muslim too?

"...Obama was trained as a muslim...he was taught... America is Satan & ...God damned it which was ingrained in [him]...Michell[e]...left the impression...she hasnt been proud of her country until Barack became president."---Steveng on 2/21/15

What's wrong with you crazy people? Oh, that's right, you're crazy! Obama has been POTUS for nearly 8 years & you're still trying to play the Muslim card to denegrate his presidency.

Okay, let's suppose he's a closet Muslim. Are you saying, as an American citizen, he doesn't have "freedom of religion" (guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution) just like all other Americans? Slanderers one day will have to give an account to God for hateful, idle words!

Train up a child in the way he shall go and he will not depart from it.

Obama was trained as a muslim at a very early age and he never parted from it. As an adult, he was taught that America is Satan and that God damned it which was ingrained in Obama for over twenty years. What did Michelle say after Obama became president? She left the impression that she hasnt been proud of her country until Barack became president.

"...Let he who is free of sin cast the first stone. Jesus may have [?] been free of sin, but none of...us is."---StrongAxe on 2/21/15

'Axe: I don't share your opinion. It doesn't squares with Scripture.

Remember John the Baptist's scathing rebuke of the Scribes & Pharisees, as well as Herod? John called the religious leaders a bunch of snakes (devils?) & he soundly rebuked Herod's adultery with his brother's wife. Yet, Jesus said there is none greater than John amongst men.

Sin must be exposed less sinners think they can get away with it. CN blogs are polluted by hateful, sinful "SLANDERERS" who need to "REPENT" of their sins less they die in them. (1 Cor. 6:9-11)

I had heard some years back that B.O even distanced himself, at that time though as it would have been damaging to his presidency, from the racism and Marxism of pastor Wrights black theology doctrine.

Seems B.O has had many bad mentors in his life, Islam, communism and racist doctrine being the main ones.

His church doctrine is stated and proudly racist. So I can't post truth about it? Woof, woof. You two make a pair, with his church a full house. GOD's Royal Straight still best hand.Sad is your defense of the indefensible. Psa_109:29 Let mine adversaries be clothed with shame, let them cover themselves with their own confusion, as with a mantle. 1Pe_2:9 But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people, that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:

"Jerry wrote this truth you gave me credit for. I agree with it and Jerry on this and all Christian Americans who voted last time around. Wistfully wishing they had investigated more at the beginning. We probably wouldn't be in the foolish situations we've allowed.

We expect a President to have Patriotic love for his country. Poser's own church doctrine declares to destroy what GOD blessed. Anyone can verify. See rev wright and doctrines of james cone. An excerpt from his book of doctrine: Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy."---Trav on 2/20/15

Trav:You wrote: Leon: ..B.O. hates our Constitution.He doesn't also have to like it... ---StrongAxe on 2/19/15

Jerry wrote this truth you gave me credit for. I agree with it and Jerry on this and all Christian Americans who voted last time around. Wistfully wishing they had investigated more at the beginning. We probably wouldn't be in the foolish situations we've allowed.

We expect a President to have Patriotic love for his country. Poser's own church doctrine declares to destroy what GOD blessed. Anyone can verify. See rev wright and doctrines of james cone. An excerpt from his book of doctrine: Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy.

(Ruff, ruff) or Thanks. You bless by vilification. I never bit you. Or foamed, you fear of exposure perceives an imaginary thing. Truth did bite you, always will. What you can't deny you've embraced as truth.

Pro_25:26 A righteous man falling down before the wicked is as a troubled fountain, a corrupt spring.

Pro_24:24 He that saith unto the wicked, Thou art righteous, him shall the people curse, nations shall abhor him:

Job_4:7 Remember, I pray thee, who ever perished, being innocent? or where were the righteous cut off?

"Regardless of how reprehensible someone's conduct is here...[that's] no reason to call him names. All that does is lower you to his level...Jesus said, 'Do unto others as YOU WOULD HAVE THEM do unto you' - NOT 'as they have done unto you'. Christianity is supposed to be pro-active, not reactive."---StrongAxe on 2/20/15

'Axe: I appreciate your point of view in this matter though I don't share it. Remember when Jesus called the Pharisees "whitewashed sepulchers" (dead men walking) & he called Herod a fox (a cunning little dog)? Jesus wasn't calling anyone out of their name. But, He was speaking to their devilish nature & character. That's the example I'm following here. Thx for your concern.

Regardless of how reprehensible someone's conduct is here (and I am speaking in general terms here), that is no reason to call him names. All that does is lower you to his level. If someone lowers his dignity by throwing mud at you, this is no reason to lower your own dignity by throwing mud back.

Jesus said, "Do unto others as YOU WOULD HAVE THEM do unto you" - NOT "as they have done unto you". Christianity is supposed to be pro-active, not reactive.

StrongAxe: "When a president takes office, he swears an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution. He doesn't also have to like it to do either one."

Good point. So why doesn't he DO what he has sworn to do? His job is to uphold the law of the land. This he refuses to do (e.g., DOMA and immigration law). He is also a divisive racist, showing disdain for whites and refusing to prosecute black criminals (e.g., Black Panther voter intimidation), not to mention his penchant for inciting riots (occupy Wall St. and Ferguson, MO).

Leon is not capable of objective discussion since he is a B.O. cultist.

You wrote: Leon: ..B.O. hates our Constitution. He has stated publically his dislike of its restrictiveness on the power of the Federal Government.

When a president takes office, he swears an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution. He doesn't also have to like it to do either one. If I buy something with a credit card, I effectively take an oath to pay for it, and will pay for it, even though I don't happen to enjoy giving money away.

Do you really suppose "you", of all people, can show me the light Jeery? Yet, I wouldn't expect anything better than that from a person of your low ilk.REPENT!!!---Leon on 2/19/15

Your light shines pretty bright Jerry on this subject. Even when you are low on ilk it lights up the entire site. Someone needs to tell Neon that his blinders are still on. He thinks the self proclaimed mongrel is a "seeing eye dog".

Mat_15:14 Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.

Leon: ..B.O. hates our Constitution. He has stated publically his dislike of its restrictiveness on the power of the Federal Government.---jerry6593 on 2/19/15

Leon is him. Leon defends who leon is. Expect him too. Let him show his neon heart, it is revealing.Poser Defends abortion...be neon-leon linked to their deaths.Defend abominations...be neonleon linked to abominations. Leon sees only what he wants to see...a neon representation of himself. Naturally he loves himself.While others are signs by the "laws in their heart" by what troubles them.Heb_8:10 ...saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: I will be to them a God, they shall be to me a people:

"...Get your head out of the dark place where it resides. B.O. hates our Constitution...has stated publically his dislike of its restrictiveness on the power of the Federal Government... is steeped in radical communism & islam...bypasses the constitutionally mandated restrictions on his power by ignoring the Congress & the Judicial branch...?"---jerry6593 on 2/19/15

Do you really suppose "you", of all people, can show me the light Jeery? What an incredibly naive & blind assumption. Yet, I wouldn't expect anything better than that from a person of your low ilk.

Here are the real facts: 1.) You hate the President & 2.) Because you hate the POTUS you spew venomous lies about him.

Leon: Get your head out of the dark place where it resides. B.O. hates our Constitution. He has stated publically his dislike of its restrictiveness on the power of the Federal Government. He is steeped in radical communism and islam. No wonder he fights against us. He bypasses the constitutionally mandated restrictions on his power by ignoring the Congress and the Judicial branch. Remember "I have a pen and a phone"?

"...another thing that is alarming is his way of going around congress to do what ever he wants. They threaten to bring suit...and then NOTHING. He certainly does not understand the AMERICAN Constitution, and thumbs his nose at it every chance he can."---kathr4453 on 2/15/15

UNTRUE KAT! The HR huffer & puffers know full well a lawsuit is a frivolous (fruitless) waste of time & taxpayer resources. The POTUS functions within & utilizes the authority given him by the U.S. Constitution. Otherwise, he'd be liable to be impeached. That's something his enemies would've done long ago if they could. The POTUS is too smart for those bozos! He certainly understands the Constitution better than "you" or me.

I watched a documentary yesterday titled Agenda: Grinding America down ...Multiculturalracism, with its embrace of everything Islam, being one of the goals to destroy American society and Christianity.---Haz27 on 2/14/15

You are observant Haz. Dan_9:7 O Lord, righteousness belongeth unto thee, but unto us confusion of faces, as at this day, to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and unto all Israel, that are near, and that are far off, through all the countries whither thou hast driven them, because of their trespass that they have trespassed against thee. Dan_9:8 O Lord, to us belongeth confusion of face, to our kings, to our princes, and to our fathers, because we have sinned against thee.

Jerry, you really must go back and study Constantine and his misinterpretation of the verse Jesus spoke..."I come not to bring peace, but a sword". The beginning of Christian violence began with Constantine, and his sword, and his supposed revelation from God, all under the name of CHRISTIAN, giving birth to inquisitions, crusades etc.

Haz27, another thing that is alarming is his way of going around congress to do what ever he wants. They threaten to bring suit etc, and then NOTHING. He certainly does not understand the AMERICAN Constitution, and thumbs his nose at it every chance he can.

Obama certainly seems to be as backward as Islam is. He has praised Islam often, yet criticizes Christianity.

I watched a documentary yesterday titled Agenda: Grinding America down and it was interesting to see the many Communist links influencing Obama.

It was also interesting to see the stated agenda of the Left from decades ago and how far they've actually succeeded. Multiculturalracism, with its embrace of everything Islam, being one of the goals to destroy American society and Christianity.

Kathr: But you miss the most important point. The RCC was not following the commands of the Bible in their slaughter of millions of innocent Christians, but the muslims ARE following their Koran in their slaughter of innocent Christians. It is the I-slam religion that is faulty - not a few bad apples.

Did you know that muslims marry first cousins, and low IQ is rampant among them? That might explain why it is easy to talk them into blowing themselves up.

I-slam is a defective religion "invented" by a thieving, murdering pedophile and governed by his book the Koran, in which adherents are commanded to murder all who will not bow to their false system of worship.///

One can say the exact same thing for the RCC during their time of power up through the DARK AGES. What can be said is Islam is as backwards today as the RCC was then, and BO has no more evolved then they have.

I for one am sick of hearing that I-slam is a religion of peace, and it is only a few bad apples causing the problems. It further sickens me to hear our faux-president assert that Christianity is equally guilty of barbaric atrocities. I-slam is a defective religion "invented" by a thieving, murdering pedophile and governed by his book the Koran, in which adherents are commanded to murder all who will not bow to their false system of worship.

Christianity on the other hand was instituted by the Son of God Himself, and its governing book, the Bible, commands us to love our enemies.

If a muslim commits atrocities, he obeys his false god. If a Christian commits them, he is condemned by his God.

Jed, I read that Mohammed once said to ease up while it was not militarily practical to fight with certain people. So, if this is true, this can match with your idea that Muslims can be waiting for the "right" advantage.

In Germany, all those people were ready to join Hitler in what they did.

So, I would say in any country of this world there are enough psychopaths who are ready to do what a dirty leader gives them authority to do.

Also, right now > look at how so many in the United States are ok with slaughtering unborn people . . . because they have been given power to do this.

NurseRobert wrote: "...there are many more that are peaceful and live harmony with their non-muslim neighbors."

They live in harmony with their non-muslim neighbors is only the beginning of thier taking over of a country. Their strategy is taken from both the Nazi's Mein Kampf and Russian's destruction from within. Do a web search using "how the muslims take over a country".

The CIA claims there are only 35,000 jihadists in Iraq and Syria. With all their survailance and spying, they are dead wrong. There are about 180,000. But even 35,000 is a lot that can destroy a lot. How many jihadists crashed into the Twin Towers?

Also, keep in mind that even the 'moderate' muslims are likely actually would-be jihadists if they lived in a place that accepted it. Since even they support Sharia and share the same deeply rooted moral and social ideals as the jihadist. The only difference is that they are not willing to go to such lengths risking their lives and families to accomplish those ideals. But given the opportunity where they could wage jihad and practice sharia without risk of reprecussions then they would in a heartbeat. It's the core of their religious beliefs. The only thing that keeps them fron acting on their beliefs is tue fact that they are the minority in many places.

NurseRob. Your contorted efforts to defend Obama's deceit and bigotry, only confirms how one's emotional attachment to a side can blind them to reality.

Jed is correct about the numbers of radical Mulims. And even the moderate Muslim majority, who are blissfully ignorant of the Quran's teachings, can't argue against its commands to violent jihad and barbaric Sharia laws when their leaders push for it. Moderate Muslims would be too scared to.

The fact remains, Obama is totally out of line pointing back to an irrelevant distant history in an effort to avoid confronting the current evil of Islamic jihad. But then Obama has a habit of being a Islamic apologist, just as the rest of the twisted Left are.

Actually, NurseRoberts, I understand your point very well. It's just wrong. And you are simply too uneducated to realize the fallacy of your own point. Even leftist analysts estimate that 15% to 25% of the world's Muslims are radicalized. That's 300+ million radical Muslims. That's more than the entire human population of the U.S. 7% (105 million) are actively involved in violent Jihad. When you have numbers like that it is not a rare exception. In addition, the remaining "moderates" still believe in covering women from head to toe, stoning gays and "adulterous" rape victims, and cutting off the hands of petty thieves. So even the supposed moderates are extreme compared to the most radical 'right wing Christians'.

Once again, Jed, my point went right over your head. You love to paint all muslims with a broad brush, but ignore the fact that for every "violent radicalized Muslim" there are many more that are peaceful and live harmony with their non-muslim neighbors.

Of course you deny any involvement of Christians in evil in the world (and before you try, look up "no true Scotsman" fallacy.

As Samuel points out, there is evil on both sides. I'm afraid in your blind hate you can't see that.

Wow NurseRoberts, someone went through a ton of effort to find the few "Christian" EXCEPTIONS to equate them to the half a billion of violent radicalized Muslims in the world today. Your totally right. Christianity and Islam is like the same!

Wisconsin Sikh Temple massacre, Aug. 5, 2012 The murder of Dr. George Tiller, May 31, 2009 Knoxville Unitarian Universalist Church shooting, July 27, 2008 The murder of Dr. John Britton, July 29, 1994 The Centennial Olympic Park bombing, July 27, 1996 The murder of Barnett Slepian byJames Charles Kopp, Oct. 23, 1998 Planned Parenthood bombing, Brookline, Massachusetts, 1994. The murder of Alan Berg, June 18, 1984Larry McQuilliams firing more than 100 rounds in the downtown area before making a failed attempt to burn down the Mexican Consulate. the tens of thousands of Muslims in central Africa "Christian militias" who are killing them?

Catholics are NOT christian. The catholics are a denomination, the true church of God isn't. The catholics have graven images, the true church of God dosen't (Exodus 20:4). The catholics repeat prayers (the rosery), the true church of God does not (Matthew 6:7). The catholics pray to dead people, the true church of God does not (Hebrews 9:27). The catholics build temples to Mary, the true church of God does not. The catholics believe Mary as co-redemptrix, the true church of God does not. The catholics baptise babies and animals, the true church of God does not. The catholic priests wear long robes, the true church of God does not (Luke 20:46).

Darlene1, I totally agree. If my memory is correct, Pope John on his 2000 year tour, apologized to the Muslims for the RCC's Crusades, and asked their forgivness. So for Obama to make that statement should be a red flag for all. Yet, there have been so many red flags with him for some time now. So anyone trying to justify his comment really makes me wonder just how closely people are paying attention.

Even so Cluny, all the crusades were for the purpose of reclaiming the Holy Lands...Jerusalem. Before the RCC's crusades, Muslims and Jews lived in peace there together.

Downplaying is perhaps not the best word to use. Yes, Christians made mistakes, and I think the Crusades were a mistake because in those days it was just not possible for the British and the Romans to hold Jerusalem.

But there the error was one of military tactics, not one of moral error.

The fact is that it wasn't all Christians that killed people in the name of Religion as Obama makes it sound like,it was the Catholic church. They ordered any non christian's killed in the Crusades and Inquisition. My question is why would Obama try to dismiss Muslim terrorist actions by comparing them with Christians unless his loyalty is to the Muslims? God Bless

Jerry, sadly, I don't think even that (beheading children on the whitehouse steps) would be enough to sway the hardcore leftist from their support of Obama. In fact, if they were white christian children it would probably only strengthen their admiration fro him.

Nurse: Is there any limit to your adoration of this pathetic psychopath-in-chief? What must he do to offend you? Behead children on the white house lawn? All of western civilization has fought against the barbaric hoard of muslims through the centuries - even our own Thomas Jefferson fought a war against them.

The crusadeS (more than one) was for the purpose of taking and controlling "Jerusalem" sending even small children to fight a war promising them heaven in return. This was the Catholic Church under the Pope's rule, was political NOT Christian. None of these efforts of the RCC wanting to totally control Jerusalem came to fruition, leaving many thousands and thousands dead. The RCC even murdered Christians and Jews along the way to Jerusalem. The difference between the RCC and CHRISTIAN need to be cleared up here. No CHRISTIAN evermurdered other Christians or Jews to take over Jerusalem. Driving the Moors out of Spain and Europe was not called a Crusade.

So with that, was Obama saying something we need to really be HEARING?

Are you denying that Christians haven't committed atrocities? Obama wasn't downplaying anything, much to the consternation of the RW.

"Obama was going for something more... faith leavened by some doubt. If you are truly appalled by the brutality of ISIS, then a wise and essential step is understanding the lure of brutality, and recalling how easily your own society can be, and how often it has been, pulled over the brink"

Obama mistook catholics as christians. They are not the same. Sure, it was the catholics who fought back the muslims during the crusades. But they did not stop there. They also went through the lands and killed all those who would not convert to catholicism.

Obama plays his puppet part very well. He deflects and always points blame away from anything and everything. By deflecting the dogs of radical Islam and their atrocities he is promoting and celebrating them. To mention history and its atrocities is to allow the idea that the dogs of radical Islam and their thirst for human blood is okay and they get a free pass because they are simply doing what has been done in the past.