Community resources

The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

It's that time of year, when I throw caution to the wind
and present my annual forecast issue. Jumping to the
conclusion, I think a recession has begun, so the relevant
question is to ask when the recovery will begin. We will
look at the housing market, the continued implosion of the
credit markets, and the deteriorating employment picture.
Will the Fed worry more about employment and recession or
about the very real inflation pressures? Oil? Gold? Which
way the dollar? I am going to make some unusual calls, as
well as highlight what I think will be the next looming
problem in the growing credit crisis. We'll try to cover it
all in just a few pages.

But first, one quick commercial note. I am looking to
establish a relationship with a few venture capitalists,
and/or broker-dealers who specialize in private equity
placements. If such a relationship might interest you,
please feel free to contact me. And now, let's jump into
the letter.

As is usual for the forecast issue, we begin by looking at
how I did last year. All in all, not bad. I correctly
predicted the housing and subprime crisis, noted that there
was a potential for the credit crisis to spread (which it
did), and suggested that we would end the year in
recession. As I will make the case later in the letter, I
think we did just that in December. I got the direction of
the dollar right, as well as energy, but I was wrong (as
usual) about the stock markets. I thought a recession would
lead to a lower stock market for 2007. It now looks like
that lower stock market will show up in 2008.

And Dow-Jones columnist Jakab Spencer graciously included
me in his list of analysts who got their predictions right.
"Author and newsletter writer John Mauldin was particularly
prescient in pointing out in plain language to his million
plus readers the potential for the early rumblings in the
subprime-mortgage market to upset the much larger market
for securitized assets of all stripes. Before most retail
investors knew what the initials 'CDO' stood for, he
spelled out the dangers and urged caution."

At the beginning of each year I choose a theme for the
forecast issue. This year, it is "Recession and Recovery."
I think we've entered a recession. As I've been writing for
over a year, I think this will be a mild recession, but the
recovery period will be prolonged and slow. My best guess
now is that the recovery will begin in the third quarter of
this year. The National Bureau of Economic Research is the
final arbiter of when recessions begin and end. However, it
will be at least a year and more likely 18 months before
they give us a decision. By that time, we will be well on
the road to recovery. So, let me make my case that we are
in recession.

18,000 Jobs? Not Really.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics put out its monthly
employment report today. The consensus forecast was for
70,000 new jobs. BLS came out with only 18,000 jobs,
promptly putting the market into a funk, with the Dow
falling 256 points. Since the economy needs to create about
150,000 jobs a month just to account for growth of
population, today's employment numbers are quite anemic.
But it's worse than the headline number would indicate.

I have touched on this in earlier letters, but let's
quickly revisit something called the birth-death ratio.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics actually does two different
surveys. One is called the payroll or establishment survey,
which is comprised of calling approximately 160,000
businesses (out of 9,000,000) and seeing how many workers
they have that month. They survey enough businesses to
cover about 1/3 of non-farm employees. And that should be
enough to get a good idea of where things are going, right?

Close, but not exactly. They do not contact very many small
businesses, and of course cannot call new businesses. And
since small and new businesses are the engine of job growth
in the US, it is important to include an estimate for them.
And they do this by estimating the number of new jobs in
various categories that are created or lost by means of
something called the birth-death (BD) ratio.

The BD ratio estimate is based upon past history. While
estimating the most recent month's employment picture is
quite difficult, you can do a fairly accurate job when you
go back a few years, using other government data, tax
information, etc. And so you can create a trend for how
many jobs you miss due to the birth and death of jobs in
the small business area. Now, remember, that number is an
average of many years of history. As an average it is
fairly accurate over long periods of time.

But there is one flaw in this methodology: it will tend to
underestimate new jobs when the economy is recovering from
recession and overestimate them when the economy is slowing
down. Thus, in 2003-4, the Democrats were beating up Bush
about the jobless recovery. As it turns out, those
employment numbers were massively revised upward a few
years later. There was in fact a powerful recovery going
on, just not in the statistics. However, nobody but a few
economic geeks paid attention, as it was last year's news.

This month the BD ratio created 66,000 new jobs for the
establishment survey, or 48,000 more jobs than the headline
number. Let's look at a table directly from the BLS web
site.

Does anyone seriously think that 17,000 jobs were created
in the financial services world this last month? Where did
that 17,000 number come from? Well, last year it was also
17,000. In fact, if you look at 2006, the numbers track
very closely with 2007, which track closely with 2005, and
so on. My prediction is that in a few years when the data
is revised we will find that December saw a loss of jobs.

And good friend Barry Ritholtz writes: "Consider: The B/D
generated 1,239,000 jobs from February thru November 2007.
That's rather surprising, since the total NFP jobs created
since January 2007 was 1,208,000. In other words, the Net
Birth/Death jobs created over 10 months was actually
greater than the total NFP jobs created in all of 2007.
That's rather odd, don't you think?"

Now, I mentioned that the Bureau of Labor Statistics does
two surveys. The other one is the household survey, where
they simply call 60,000 homes (at random) and ask how many
people are in the home and who has jobs (part-time or
full-time), does anyone want a job who doesn't have one,
and so on. This survey covers people who are employed both
by large and small employers, illegal immigrants, etc.

(By the way, this is going to become increasingly suspect
as more of us simply use cell phones and do not have a home
phone. It will skew the survey.)

These surveys tend to parallel each other, except at
turning points in the economy. Then there can be some large
discrepancies. As an example, take this month's household
survey.

There was a loss of 436,000 jobs in the household survey.
Unemployment rose to 5%, up from 4.4% last February, and
4.7% last month. Writes Philippa Dunne from The Liscio
Report: "Rises of that magnitude are rare; it's 1.6
standard deviations from the mean, and at the 92nd
percentile of monthly changes since 1950. They're even
rarer outside recessions; of the 55 rises of 0.3 point or
more, just 18 have been in expansions, and most of those
were either close to recessions or in jobless recoveries.
In fact, the last time we saw a 0.3 point rise was in
January 2001, two months before the official cycle peak.
More than half the rise in unemployment came from permanent
job losers."

Now we know why Christmas consumer spending was so weak.
And some segments of the economy were particularly hard
hit. Unemployment rose to 17.1% for all youth, and 34.7%
for black youth (up by 5%!!!). 6.9% of single women with
children are unemployed, and are losing jobs faster than
the work force at large. Part-time jobs are way up. The BLS
also tracks part-time jobs of people who are doing them out
of economic necessity, and that is up even more.

All in all, this was an ugly labor report. Look at the
graph below from Chart of the Day. (www.chartoftheday.com)

A rise of 0.5% unemployment (from the bottom) has always
been associated with a recession. We are already up 0.6%.
It is hard to imagine how it will not be so this time. So,
how did we get here? As I have written for a long time, it
is the result of the bursting of the twin bubbles of the
housing market and the credit markets. This process is
going to take a long time, and create major headwinds for
the economic recovery. Let's look briefly at each one,
although I will go into more detail in later letters.

Housing: Going Down, Down, Down

Let's look at two charts from Gary Shilling's latest
letter. They pretty much say it all:

Notice that the inventory of new homes is continuing to
rise. Also, that new home sales have not fallen to the
level of 1991. There is still significant potential
downside for new home sales. Separate work by Shilling
suggests that some 2,000,000 excess homes have been built
over the past decade. These have been bought by speculators
and people who we are now discovering they cannot afford to
make the payments on the homes. Low rates, rising prices,
and reckless lending standards spurred an irrational rush
into housing speculation, and sent the wrong signals to
builders, who responded by overbuilding.

New home construction is still way too high given the
inventory levels, and will fall further. It is way too
early to call a bottom of the housing market, or a recovery
of home builders. Now let's look at the next chart:

Shilling projects housing prices to drop by about 25%. Some
will counter that Gary is way too bearish, but Bank of
America estimates are not far from that. Professor Robert
Shiller of Yale, who created the S&P Case/Shiller index
which tracks housing prices, recently suggested in a Times
Online article that homeowners have lost about $1 trillion
and could lose three times that much over the next few
years. That is consistent with a 20-25% drop in home
prices.

And remember, that is a national average. Some areas in
California, Nevada, and Florida where speculation was
particularly rampant could see drops of up to 50%. Writes
Shilling: "And there's lots more to go. As noted earlier,
it would take a 24% decline in prices to re-establish the
normal relationship with building costs. A 27% fall is
required to bring house prices back in line with rents. And
a 50% drop is needed to return to norm when house prices
are adjusted for overall inflation and their growing size."
Ouch.

One last chart from Gary to illustrate the problem. Vacant
properties are at an all-time high. Speculators who bought
homes to flip are now in a cash crunch. They can either
rent at a loss, or see their homes foreclosed. This is
going to create a real oversupply of homes for at least
several years.

As I have made the case for over a year, the negative
wealth affect from falling home prices is going to put a
damper on consumer spending. The reduced ability to borrow
money on homes is going to put a crimp in consumer
spending. Higher unemployment from fewer construction,
mortgage, and housing-related industry jobs will negatively
affect spending.

This is going to be a problem until at least the middle of
2009, as it will take that long to work through inventories
and foreclosures. That is one of the reasons why I think
the recovery will be slower than it normally would be. But
now let's turn to the second bubble, and a brewing problem
that could mean a further round of massive bank write-offs.

Who's Got My Credit Default Swap Back?

My middle son is an online gamer, typically playing combat
games with teams formed by players from around the world.
To advance in the rankings, you have to work together.
"I've got your back" is a frequently heard term in my
house. If no one has your back in the gaming world, you can
be pretty sure that the enemy will soon be there and you
will be a statistic.

The "back" for the mortgage investment business seems to be
particularly absent. As in the online gaming world, it
could get ugly really quick. And a lot uglier than I
thought just a few weeks ago.

In a brilliant article in the Wall Street Journal, Carrick
Mollenkamp and Serena Ng detailed the rise and fall of a
collateral debt obligation (CDO) called Norma, ushered into
existence by Merrill Lynch. This is a $1.5 billion CDO
created in March of 2007 with over 90% of its paper rating
"A" or better, and $1.125 billion rated AAA. In November
2007, the entire CDO was downgraded to junk.

That is not particularly news, as there are a lot of
subprime CDOs that are being downgraded. What caught my eye
was how this CDO was created. Quoting (and emphasis mine):

"For Norma, [the manager] assembled $1.5 billion in
investments. Most were not actual securities, but
derivatives linked to triple-B-rated mortgage securities.
Called credit default swaps, these derivatives worked like
insurance policies on subprime residential mortgage-backed
securities or on the CDOs that held them. Norma, acting as
the insurer, would receive a regular premium payment, which
it would pass on to its investors. The buyer protection,
which was initially Merrill Lynch, would receive payouts
from Norma if the insured securities were hurt by losses.
It is unclear whether Merrill retained the insurance, or
resold it to other investors who were hedging their
subprime exposure or betting on a meltdown.

"Many investment banks favored CDOs that contain these
credit default swaps, because they didn't require the
purchase of securities, a process that typically took
months. With credit default swaps, a billion-dollar CDO
could be assembled in weeks.

"UBS Investment Research estimates that CEOs sold credit
protection on around three times the actual face value off
triple-B-rated subprime bonds. 'The use of derivatives
"multiplied the risk," says Greg Medcraft, chairman of the
American Securitization Forum, an industry association.
'The subprime mortgage crisis is far greater in terms of
potential losses than anyone expected, because it's not
just physical loans that are defaulting.'"

The article goes on to detail how the entire CDO world is
one large daisy chain of credit default swaps. Who's got
your back? And who's got the back of the guy who has your
back? And .... you better hope it is not ACA.

Never heard of the company? You will. ACA has dropped 95%,
from $16.55 to $0.86 today. Why? Because the company sold
credit insurance on CDOs. "If now junk rated ACA can't come
up with an additional $1.7 billion in capital by January
18, it will be insolvent and the $69 billion in credit
default swaps on CDOs it underwrote will be worthless."
(Shilling) $69 billion? That is huge. Think that won't hurt
balance sheets all over the world?

Counterparty Risk is the Real Sleeper Issue

There is never just one cockroach. Write this down.
Counterparty risk in the credit default swap market will be
a huge story in 2008. Losses are going to mount far higher
than estimates from just a few months ago. I believe that
many financial institutions will be taking large losses
every quarter for the next few quarters. At the end of each
quarter, investors will hope that this is finally the end.
"Surely this time they have gotten it all out in the open."
It won't be, because banks can't write down loans until the
counterparty risk problem is solved. Who's got your back?

Between more massive subprime-related losses, being forced
to bring SIVs back onto their balance sheets, and
deteriorating credit quality in other bank lines (like
credit cards and auto loans, as well as commercial real
estate), banks are going to be forced to raise capital and
tighten lending standards. This is not something that is
going to happen in one quarter. It may take the better part
of the year for all of this to flush out of the system.

This tightening stance will also contribute to a slower
than usual recovery. Even if the Fed cuts rates again and
again, the banks still have to raise capital and become
more prudent lenders. And that means the cost of borrowing
is going up.

The Fed: Too Little, Too Late

There are those who hope that the Fed will ride to the
rescue with more rate cuts. I believe they will, but it is
a case of "too little, too late." I think we will see a Fed
rate below 3% by the end of the summer, if not before. But
they are likely to initially take it slow, until it is
clear we are in a recession, and/or inflation pressures
have abated.

While rate cuts will help in general, the problem is that
rate cuts won't help the credit crisis, won't solve the
problem of credit default swaps, and won't bring back the
subprime market. These are problems we simply have to work
our way through, and it is going to take time.

Investment banks and the financial services industry made a
great deal of money on securitizing all manner of risk. In
general, that is a very good thing, except when the risk is
fraudulent subprime mortgages. That source of income is
drying up. You can bet the banks are working overtime on
creating new forms of securitization that will allow for
transparency and increased investor protection. There is a
market for risk properly packaged and understood. Profits
at investment banks are going to be under pressure until
these new structures are developed and accepted by the
marketplace. They have the incentive to get this done
quickly and done right.

So let's get to the predictions. I think that we are in a
recession for most of the first half of this year, and that
we begin a slow recovery in the second half. It will be a
Muddle Through Economy for at least another year after
that. That would suggest that most companies will come
under serious earnings pressure. If history is any
indicator, that means we should see a bear market in the
first half of this year. How deep will depend on how fast
the Fed cuts, but I don't think we are looking at anything
close to the bear market of 2000-2001. Still, I wouldn't
want to stand in front of a bear market train.

Consumer spending is going to slow, and it will be slower
to rebound, for reasons outlined above. That will also
make the recovery in the stock market a little slower. But
I expect to become bullish on the market sometime this
summer, if not before. I'm looking forward to it.

It also follows that bonds are a good buy at this point. It
would not surprise me to see the 10-year bond fall to 3.5%.

I think the United Kingdom follows the United States into
a mild recession, and European growth will come under
pressure. Nearly every central bank in the developed world
outside of Japan will be cutting rates by the beginning of
summer. China will not have a hard landing this year.

I've been bearish on the dollar since early 2002. Sometime
in the first half of this year I think we see the dollar
bottom out against the euro and the British pound. When the
Bank of England and the ECB start cutting their rates, the
dollar will start rising. The US will recover faster than
its European counterparts, and that will help drive the
dollar higher. The dollar is massively undervalued against
those currencies. I think the dollar ends up higher by the
end of the year, maybe by 10% or more. As I have written
before, I expect the dollar to be at $1.20 against the euro
once again, and sometime next decade it will be at parity.

But not against Asian currencies. I expect the dollar to
continue to drop against the Chinese yuan, the Japanese
yen, and other major Asian currencies.

This will be a challenge to gold, and we could be in a
period of price consolidation for the yellow metal. But at
current prices, gold stocks are attractive.

There will still be significant growth in emerging markets,
which will therefore increase demand for oil and energy,
offsetting potentially weaker demand in the developed
world. Six months from now energy inflation will begin to
subside, if only because the year-over-year comparisons
become easier. I believe oil is going higher, but maybe not
this year, barring a crisis of some type. I am still a
believer in natural resource stocks and alternative energy
for the long run.

Europe, Santa Barbara, China, and The Motley Fool

I will be traveling to Europe the third week of January. I
will be in Geneva on Monday the 21st, Zu:rich on Tuesday,
Barcelona on Wednesday, and in London on Thursday and
Friday, coming back Saturday. We do have time in the
schedule for additional meetings. My European partners at
Absolute Return Partners in London are taking care of my
schedule, and I'll be glad to put you in touch with them.

When I get back from Europe, Tiffani and I will be going to
Santa Barbara to meet with Jon Sundt and the partners at
Altegris Investments for our annual planning meetings. This
year we're going to go to Jon's ranch house in the coastal
mountains. It is a beautiful place, and I'm looking forward
to our time together, and also to raiding his wine cellar.

I don't often do this, but I have been reading South
African partner Dr. Prieur du Plessis's blog for a while,
and for those of you who want timely market comments, you
should consider subscribing. It is free, but I find it
valuable. You can go to:
http://www.investmentpostcards.com.

I mentioned a few weeks ago that I had been nominated for
Investor of the Year by the Motley Fool. Well, the online
votes are in. From their web site: "You saw this one
coming, right? Buffett wins again, with 41% of the vote, in
another 2-to-1 margin of victory. The surprise runner-up
here: John Mauldin - advisor to the hedge-fund stars,
president of Millennium Wave Advisors, and author of the
Thoughts From the Frontline weekly newsletter. What makes
Mauldin a worthy second to the Oracle of Omaha? Read his
May 2006 interview with the Fool (parts one, two, and
three) and find out." I am going to do another interview
next week and will give you a link when it is up.

And no, I am not going to China. Not yet anyway. But a few
weeks ago my Chinese-language version of this letter topped
2000 subscribers. I started this letter, seven years ago,
with 2000 subscribers. We'll see if lightning can strike
twice. You can subscribe to the Chinese version at
www.frontlinethoughts.cn.

It is time to hit the send button. Friends and family are
calling. I am going to try and get a few of them to help me
take the tree down this year. It was an especially nice
tree, and created some nice memories in the new place.

Thanks for being part of my Thoughts from the Frontline
family, and for recommending it to your friends. I do
appreciate it.

Your thinking he is going to be tired at the end of the
week in Europe analyst,

John Mauldin
John@FrontLineThoughts.com

Copyright 2008 John Mauldin. All Rights Reserved

Note: The generic Accredited Investor E-letters are not an
offering for any investment. It represents only the
opinions of John Mauldin and Millennium Wave Investments.
It is intended solely for accredited investors who have
registered with Millennium Wave Investments and Altegris
Investments at www.accreditedinvestor.ws or directly
related websites and have been so registered for no less
than 30 days. The Accredited Investor E-Letter is provided
on a confidential basis, and subscribers to the Accredited
Investor E-Letter are not to send this letter to anyone
other than their professional investment counselors.
Investors should discuss any investment with their personal
investment counsel. John Mauldin is the President of
Millennium Wave Advisors, LLC (MWA), which is an investment
advisory firm registered with multiple states. John Mauldin
is a registered representative of Millennium Wave
Securities, LLC, (MWS), an FINRA registered broker-dealer.
MWS is also a Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) and a Commodity
Trading Advisor (CTA) registered with the CFTC, as well as
an Introducing Broker (IB). Millennium Wave Investments is
a dba of MWA LLC and MWS LLC. Millennium Wave Investments
cooperates in the consulting on and marketing of private
investment offerings with other independent firms such as
Altegris Investments; Absolute Return Partners, LLP;
Pro-Hedge Funds; EFG Capital International Corp; and Plexus
Asset Management. Funds recommended by Mauldin may pay a
portion of their fees to these independent firms, who will
share 1/3 of those fees with MWS and thus with Mauldin. Any
views expressed herein are provided for information
purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an
offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest with any
CTA, fund, or program mentioned here or elsewhere. Before
seeking any advisor's services or making an investment in a
fund, investors must read and examine thoroughly the
respective disclosure document or offering memorandum.
Since these firms and Mauldin receive fees from the funds
they recommend/market, they only recommend/market products
with which they have been able to negotiate fee
arrangements.
Send to a Friend | Print Article | View as PDF |
Permissions/Reprints
You have permission to publish this article electronically
or in print as long as the following is included:

John Mauldin, Best-Selling author and recognized financial
expert, is also editor of the free Thoughts From the
Frontline that goes to over 1 million readers each week.
For more information on John or his FREE weekly economic
letter go to: http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/learnmore

To subscribe to John Mauldin's E-Letter please click here:
http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/subscribe.asp

If you would ALSO like changes applied to the Accredited
Investor E- Letter, please include your old and new email
address along with a note requesting the change for both
e-letters and send your request to
wave@frontlinethoughts.com

To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS
RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN
INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE
INVESTMENTS, INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS, YOU SHOULD CONSIDER
VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS: OFTEN
ENGAGE IN LEVERAGING AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT
PRACTICES THAT MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS,
CAN BE ILLIQUID, ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PERIODIC
PRICING OR VALUATION INFORMATION TO INVESTORS, MAY INVOLVE
COMPLEX TAX STRUCTURES AND DELAYS IN DISTRIBUTING IMPORTANT
TAX INFORMATION, ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY
REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND
IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT
TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

John Mauldin is also president of Millennium Wave Advisors,
LLC, a registered investment advisor. All material
presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot
attest to its accuracy. All material represents the
opinions of John Mauldin. Investment recommendations may
change and readers are urged to check with their investment
counselors before making any investment decisions. Opinions
expressed in these reports may change without prior notice.
John Mauldin and/or the staff at Thoughts from the
Frontline may or may not have investments in any funds
cited above. Mauldin can be reached at 800-829-7273.

-------------------------------------------------------

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here:
http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/unsubscribe.asp
Or send an email To: wave@frontlinethoughts.com
This email was sent to service@stratfor.com