Shiv ran a 10.82 back in May, although most people on this forum don't think anything he does is legitimate. I think the cars have it in them, but I don't know of anyone other than Shiv who has dragged one.

I was at Laguna Seca the weekend before Shift S3ctor, and destroyed both of my front fenders flying into the corkscrew lol. I'll go to Sacramento Raceway once my car is out of the body shop and post some results.

Shiv ran a 10.82 back in May, although most people on this forum don't think anything he does is legitimate. I think the cars have it in them, but I don't know of anyone other than Shiv who has dragged one.

I was at Laguna Seca the weekend before Shift S3ctor, and destroyed both of my front fenders flying into the corkscrew lol. I'll go to Sacramento Raceway once my car is out of the body shop and post some results.

well if we had graphs of MT and AT with the ST we could all determine that

The comparison dyno graphs posted already show the difference well. Actually, for the comparison between AT and MT, you could take any MT dyno graph and imagine the AT WHP turning downward at 6200 for preparing for the AT gear shift. For example in the graph below, you can see how much of the upper RPM and WHP would be cut off if you cut the line at 6200 RPM in case of AT.