Breaking News:Kidnapping Allegations against PM (Guyana) Wife

Rickford BurkeBreaking News: Yvonne Hinds, wife of Guyana's prime minister Sam Hinds, allegedly kidnaps her grandson, who is the subject of a custody battle in a Pennsylvania court, and flees the jurisdiction with the child in violation of an order of a Superior Court that is hearing an appeal of a lower court's decision. Guyana has no extradition treaty with the US.. Hearing on the matter scheduled for next Wednesday ...... more to follow.

Nikolai petitioned for and obtain full custody of his three year son from his estranged wife, Elizabeth Hinds, a Venezuelan national.

Mrs. Yvonne Hinds reportedly falsely testified in court that her son was never involved in any violent crime inGuyana and has no criminal record. However court filings and testimony indicate that Nikolai Hinds has a violent history, and was ostensibly arrested four years ago in Georgetown, and then released, for allegedly shooting a gentleman in the ear in the vicinity of the Prime Minister’s residence in Georgetown, Guyana. Elizabeth testified that the man allegedly shouted “Sam Hinds is a low life,” referring to the Guyanese Prime Minister, while passing the Hinds’ residence, prompting Nikolai to chase after him. She said Nikolai then slapped the gentleman in the face with a gun but that the safety pin unlatched, causing the gun go off. The bullet shot off piece of the man’s ear she testified. Nikolai was arrested by Police but was allegedly released after his father intervened. Yvonne Hinds, however, denied under oath that these incidents ever took place. The junior Hinds’ wife, Elizabeth, also testified that her now estranged husband is abusive and routinely committed serious violent acts against her. Testifying that her husband once pulled her out of a night club in Guyana with a gun to her head, Elizabeth said that Nikolai is “trigger happy” and habitually pulled out his gun whenever in a confrontation. Attorneys for Elizabeth argue that judge erred in granting Hinds “full custody” of the child, with provision to remove him from the United States without the consent of his mother. They posit that the judgment was reliant upon the political clout of Prime Minister Hinds and his wife, who they say offered false testimony. They argue that the Family Court judge has no jurisdiction to award custody of a child, who is a United States citizen, to a none US citizen parent residing outside of the US, especially when the mother is a resident of the US and has not been found by a court of law to be an incompetent parent. Reports are that Nikolai came to the US on a student visa which has reportedly now expired. He has worked at JFK Airport as a baggage handler for Delta airlines, and is set to return to his country of origin. The attorneys plan to appeal the judges ruling to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and to seek injunctive relief, baring the Hinds’ from removing the child from the US until a final determination of the matter. Meanwhile Elizabeth Hinds has now retained the services of an international custody attorney. Court observes say that the case is likely to quickly evolve into another bitter international custody case involving a US born child.

Originally posted by Catherine:We are not worried when a "grandmother" (MAY HAVE) taken her grandchild (AND FOR GOOD REASONS).

:

This is America you fool and not PPP Guyana where anyone and anything can be bought.If what Bonus posted is true then trust me Sam Hinds and the PPP will be minced meat FOR THE aMERICAN AND INTERNATIONAL pRESS.

Originally posted by Catherine:We are not worried when a "grandmother" (MAY HAVE) taken her grandchild (AND FOR GOOD REASONS).

:

This is America you fool and not PPP Guyana where anyone and anything can be bought.If what Bonus posted is true then trust me Sam Hinds and the PPP will be minced meat FOR THE aMERICAN AND INTERNATIONAL pRESS.

Nikolai petitioned for and obtain full custody of his three year son from his estranged wife, Elizabeth Hinds, a Venezuelan national.

Mrs. Yvonne Hinds reportedly falsely testified in court that her son was never involved in any violent crime inGuyana and has no criminal record. However court filings and testimony indicate that Nikolai Hinds has a violent history, and was ostensibly arrested four years ago in Georgetown, and then released, for allegedly shooting a gentleman in the ear in the vicinity of the Prime Minister’s residence in Georgetown, Guyana. Elizabeth testified that the man allegedly shouted “Sam Hinds is a low life,” referring to the Guyanese Prime Minister, while passing the Hinds’ residence, prompting Nikolai to chase after him. She said Nikolai then slapped the gentleman in the face with a gun but that the safety pin unlatched, causing the gun go off. The bullet shot off piece of the man’s ear she testified. Nikolai was arrested by Police but was allegedly released after his father intervened. Yvonne Hinds, however, denied under oath that these incidents ever took place. The junior Hinds’ wife, Elizabeth, also testified that her now estranged husband is abusive and routinely committed serious violent acts against her. Testifying that her husband once pulled her out of a night club in Guyana with a gun to her head, Elizabeth said that Nikolai is “trigger happy” and habitually pulled out his gun whenever in a confrontation. Attorneys for Elizabeth argue that judge erred in granting Hinds “full custody” of the child, with provision to remove him from the United States without the consent of his mother. They posit that the judgment was reliant upon the political clout of Prime Minister Hinds and his wife, who they say offered false testimony. They argue that the Family Court judge has no jurisdiction to award custody of a child, who is a United States citizen, to a none US citizen parent residing outside of the US, especially when the mother is a resident of the US and has not been found by a court of law to be an incompetent parent. Reports are that Nikolai came to the US on a student visa which has reportedly now expired. He has worked at JFK Airport as a baggage handler for Delta airlines, and is set to return to his country of origin. The attorneys plan to appeal the judges ruling to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and to seek injunctive relief, baring the Hinds’ from removing the child from the US until a final determination of the matter. Meanwhile Elizabeth Hinds has now retained the services of an international custody attorney. Court observes say that the case is likely to quickly evolve into another bitter international custody case involving a US born child.

Which man on this board here would want his wife or girlfriend to be at nightclubs dancing up with other men around at 1 am in the morning?Particularly if the woman has a child for him.

Originally posted by Catherine:We are not worried when a "grandmother" (MAY HAVE) taken her grandchild (AND FOR GOOD REASONS).

Society as a whole should be worried when a man (allegedly kidnaps) a child.

You are never worried about the law or the rights of the mothers. It is not the grand mothers right to do that if she did as was suggested. Her son obviously has some issues with temper if the wife speaks the truth and those are all issues to be resolved. If this lady did as was suggested her goose is cooked where the US is concerned.

Nikolai petitioned for and obtain full custody of his three year son from his estranged wife, Elizabeth Hinds, a Venezuelan national.

Mrs. Yvonne Hinds reportedly falsely testified in court that her son was never involved in any violent crime inGuyana and has no criminal record. However court filings and testimony indicate that Nikolai Hinds has a violent history, and was ostensibly arrested four years ago in Georgetown, and then released, for allegedly shooting a gentleman in the ear in the vicinity of the Prime Minister’s residence in Georgetown, Guyana. Elizabeth testified that the man allegedly shouted “Sam Hinds is a low life,” referring to the Guyanese Prime Minister, while passing the Hinds’ residence, prompting Nikolai to chase after him. She said Nikolai then slapped the gentleman in the face with a gun but that the safety pin unlatched, causing the gun go off. The bullet shot off piece of the man’s ear she testified. Nikolai was arrested by Police but was allegedly released after his father intervened. Yvonne Hinds, however, denied under oath that these incidents ever took place. The junior Hinds’ wife, Elizabeth, also testified that her now estranged husband is abusive and routinely committed serious violent acts against her. Testifying that her husband once pulled her out of a night club in Guyana with a gun to her head, Elizabeth said that Nikolai is “trigger happy” and habitually pulled out his gun whenever in a confrontation. Attorneys for Elizabeth argue that judge erred in granting Hinds “full custody” of the child, with provision to remove him from the United States without the consent of his mother. They posit that the judgment was reliant upon the political clout of Prime Minister Hinds and his wife, who they say offered false testimony. They argue that the Family Court judge has no jurisdiction to award custody of a child, who is a United States citizen, to a none US citizen parent residing outside of the US, especially when the mother is a resident of the US and has not been found by a court of law to be an incompetent parent. Reports are that Nikolai came to the US on a student visa which has reportedly now expired. He has worked at JFK Airport as a baggage handler for Delta airlines, and is set to return to his country of origin. The attorneys plan to appeal the judges ruling to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and to seek injunctive relief, baring the Hinds’ from removing the child from the US until a final determination of the matter. Meanwhile Elizabeth Hinds has now retained the services of an international custody attorney. Court observes say that the case is likely to quickly evolve into another bitter international custody case involving a US born child.

Which man on this board here would want his wife or girlfriend to be at nightclubs dancing up with other men around at 1 am in the morning?Particularly if the woman has a child for him.

That is her right and it does not make her a bad mother if the needs of her child is taken care of. Girlfriends are not wives and his decision to keep her as a girlfriend or not has no bearing on this case.

I wonder why the point in the article of this boy pistol whipping someone did not get your attention. That is criminal behavior enough to have him in the pen for multiple offenses from fire arms possession to attempted murder. That is not dancing.

Originally posted by Wally:Any girlfriend or wife of mine who is at a nightclub at 1 am dancing with other men will find herself locked out when she returns home.

The problem with us Guyanese men today is that we don't have any backbone anymore to stand up to these Western Educated Guyanese ladies. We were truly beaten down by Janet.

And that would be your right but it does not afford you superior custodial rights. In the US, the mother is given a preference. The partying can come in there but it has little bearing if the father does not demonstrate that this is to the neglect of the child.

I think you are out of your mind to believe standing up means a denial of rights. West Indian men are on moral levels of goats when it comes to fidelity. However, for men that is seen as normal and since we invest the cultural boundaries on the heads of our female folks we attribute to them grounds of moral guardianship of the group.

Well, the need to man up or shut up. Either the character of each is on equal grounds or the fuss is about nothing.

Nikolai petitioned for and obtain full custody of his three year son from his estranged wife, Elizabeth Hinds, a Venezuelan national.

Mrs. Yvonne Hinds reportedly falsely testified in court that her son was never involved in any violent crime inGuyana and has no criminal record. However court filings and testimony indicate that Nikolai Hinds has a violent history, and was ostensibly arrested four years ago in Georgetown, and then released, for allegedly shooting a gentleman in the ear in the vicinity of the Prime Minister’s residence in Georgetown, Guyana. Elizabeth testified that the man allegedly shouted “Sam Hinds is a low life,” referring to the Guyanese Prime Minister, while passing the Hinds’ residence, prompting Nikolai to chase after him. She said Nikolai then slapped the gentleman in the face with a gun but that the safety pin unlatched, causing the gun go off. The bullet shot off piece of the man’s ear she testified. Nikolai was arrested by Police but was allegedly released after his father intervened. Yvonne Hinds, however, denied under oath that these incidents ever took place. The junior Hinds’ wife, Elizabeth, also testified that her now estranged husband is abusive and routinely committed serious violent acts against her. Testifying that her husband once pulled her out of a night club in Guyana with a gun to her head, Elizabeth said that Nikolai is “trigger happy” and habitually pulled out his gun whenever in a confrontation. Attorneys for Elizabeth argue that judge erred in granting Hinds “full custody” of the child, with provision to remove him from the United States without the consent of his mother. They posit that the judgment was reliant upon the political clout of Prime Minister Hinds and his wife, who they say offered false testimony. They argue that the Family Court judge has no jurisdiction to award custody of a child, who is a United States citizen, to a none US citizen parent residing outside of the US, especially when the mother is a resident of the US and has not been found by a court of law to be an incompetent parent. Reports are that Nikolai came to the US on a student visa which has reportedly now expired. He has worked at JFK Airport as a baggage handler for Delta airlines, and is set to return to his country of origin. The attorneys plan to appeal the judges ruling to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and to seek injunctive relief, baring the Hinds’ from removing the child from the US until a final determination of the matter. Meanwhile Elizabeth Hinds has now retained the services of an international custody attorney. Court observes say that the case is likely to quickly evolve into another bitter international custody case involving a US born child.

Which man on this board here would want his wife or girlfriend to be at nightclubs dancing up with other men around at 1 am in the morning?Particularly if the woman has a child for him.

Nikolai petitioned for and obtain full custody of his three year son from his estranged wife, Elizabeth Hinds, a Venezuelan national.

Mrs. Yvonne Hinds reportedly falsely testified in court that her son was never involved in any violent crime inGuyana and has no criminal record. However court filings and testimony indicate that Nikolai Hinds has a violent history, and was ostensibly arrested four years ago in Georgetown, and then released, for allegedly shooting a gentleman in the ear in the vicinity of the Prime Minister’s residence in Georgetown, Guyana. Elizabeth testified that the man allegedly shouted “Sam Hinds is a low life,” referring to the Guyanese Prime Minister, while passing the Hinds’ residence, prompting Nikolai to chase after him. She said Nikolai then slapped the gentleman in the face with a gun but that the safety pin unlatched, causing the gun go off. The bullet shot off piece of the man’s ear she testified. Nikolai was arrested by Police but was allegedly released after his father intervened. Yvonne Hinds, however, denied under oath that these incidents ever took place. The junior Hinds’ wife, Elizabeth, also testified that her now estranged husband is abusive and routinely committed serious violent acts against her. Testifying that her husband once pulled her out of a night club in Guyana with a gun to her head, Elizabeth said that Nikolai is “trigger happy” and habitually pulled out his gun whenever in a confrontation. Attorneys for Elizabeth argue that judge erred in granting Hinds “full custody” of the child, with provision to remove him from the United States without the consent of his mother. They posit that the judgment was reliant upon the political clout of Prime Minister Hinds and his wife, who they say offered false testimony. They argue that the Family Court judge has no jurisdiction to award custody of a child, who is a United States citizen, to a none US citizen parent residing outside of the US, especially when the mother is a resident of the US and has not been found by a court of law to be an incompetent parent. Reports are that Nikolai came to the US on a student visa which has reportedly now expired. He has worked at JFK Airport as a baggage handler for Delta airlines, and is set to return to his country of origin. The attorneys plan to appeal the judges ruling to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and to seek injunctive relief, baring the Hinds’ from removing the child from the US until a final determination of the matter. Meanwhile Elizabeth Hinds has now retained the services of an international custody attorney. Court observes say that the case is likely to quickly evolve into another bitter international custody case involving a US born child.

Which man on this board here would want his wife or girlfriend to be at nightclubs dancing up with other men around at 1 am in the morning?Particularly if the woman has a child for him.

I suggest you keep my wife out of this. You do not know me and I do not get on this board and speak of my outside women and *****house escapades insulting her. I suggest you keep your infantile behavior to yourself if you cannot contribute to a dialog on morals which you evidently lack.

My advice to Guyanese men is this: forget about marrying these Guyanese women/ and other western educated ladies. All that will happen is that they will give you high blood pressure. Just get yourself a couple thousand dollars then go to Pakistan, Sudan or Somalia and buy yourself a wife. Two things I know for sure. First, you will never be hungry. Second, she will never be at the night club at 1 am in the morning.

Yvone Hinds can be deemed a fugitive for kidnapping an American and Sam Hinds, not being present at the commission of the offense, and being one who, after the offense, assists or shelters the offender is an accessary after the fact. He may not be able to hide behind his diplomat visa.

Originally posted by Wally:My advice to Guyanese men is this: forget about marrying these Guyanese women/ and other western educated ladies. All that will happen is that they will give you high blood pressure. Just get yourself a couple thousand dollars then go to Pakistan, Sudan or Somalia and buy yourself a wife. Two things I know for sure. First, you will never be hungry. Second, she will never be at the night club at 1 am in the morning.

Originally posted by Wally:My advice to Guyanese men is this: forget about marrying these Guyanese women/ and other western educated ladies. All that will happen is that they will give you high blood pressure. Just get yourself a couple thousand dollars then go to Pakistan, Sudan or Somalia and buy yourself a wife. Two things I know for sure. First, you will never be hungry. Second, she will never be at the night club at 1 am in the morning.

You really do have low opinion of our women folks! Why do think in Pakistan etc the women are not cognizant of rights per western society? Are you looking for a wife or a cook? You can get a the best cook for 40K a year if that is what you seek you do not need to go to Pakistan for that. And those of us who are married to "western" educated women can assure you that our wives are not in bars or clubs at 1 am

Originally posted by Wally:My advice to Guyanese men is this: forget about marrying these Guyanese women/ and other western educated ladies. All that will happen is that they will give you high blood pressure. Just get yourself a couple thousand dollars then go to Pakistan, Sudan or Somalia and buy yourself a wife. Two things I know for sure. First, you will never be hungry. Second, she will never be at the night club at 1 am in the morning.

You really do have low opinion of our women folks! Why do think in Pakistan etc the women are not cognizant of rights per western society? Are you looking for a wife or a cook? You can get a the best cook for 40K a year if that is what you seek you do not need to go to Pakistan for that. And those of us who are married to "western" educated women can assure you that our wives are not in bars or clubs at 1 am

D2 my brother, I got a feeling that you went to bed many nights crying and hungry.

Originally posted by Wally:My advice to Guyanese men is this: forget about marrying these Guyanese women/ and other western educated ladies. All that will happen is that they will give you high blood pressure. Just get yourself a couple thousand dollars then go to Pakistan, Sudan or Somalia and buy yourself a wife. Two things I know for sure. First, you will never be hungry. Second, she will never be at the night club at 1 am in the morning.

You really do have low opinion of our women folks! Why do think in Pakistan etc the women are not cognizant of rights per western society? Are you looking for a wife or a cook? You can get a the best cook for 40K a year if that is what you seek you do not need to go to Pakistan for that. And those of us who are married to "western" educated women can assure you that our wives are not in bars or clubs at 1 am

D2 my brother, I got a feeling that you went to bed many nights crying and hungry.

First of all, my wife does not cook. Her not ever caring to cook never bothered me even when we were in college. There was always the delivery service or a nearby restaurant. I most certainly can dial a phone. I also cook a lot and because my wife is a good restaurant critic I am good at it. I did not marry her for her cooking skills.

Originally posted by Wally:My advice to Guyanese men is this: forget about marrying these Guyanese women/ and other western educated ladies. All that will happen is that they will give you high blood pressure. Just get yourself a couple thousand dollars then go to Pakistan, Sudan or Somalia and buy yourself a wife. Two things I know for sure. First, you will never be hungry. Second, she will never be at the night club at 1 am in the morning.

You really do have low opinion of our women folks! Why do think in Pakistan etc the women are not cognizant of rights per western society? Are you looking for a wife or a cook? You can get a the best cook for 40K a year if that is what you seek you do not need to go to Pakistan for that. And those of us who are married to "western" educated women can assure you that our wives are not in bars or clubs at 1 am

D2 my brother, I got a feeling that you went to bed many nights crying and hungry.

First of all, my wife does not cook. Her not ever caring to cook never bothered me even when we were in college. There was always the delivery service or a nearby restaurant. I most certainly can dial a phone. I also cook a lot and because my wife is a good restaurant critic I am good at it. I did not marry her for her cooking skills.

Why would this woman cook for this old man who spend most of his time on GNI yapping nonsense all damn day and night.?????

Originally posted by Wally:My advice to Guyanese men is this: forget about marrying these Guyanese women/ and other western educated ladies. All that will happen is that they will give you high blood pressure. Just get yourself a couple thousand dollars then go to Pakistan, Sudan or Somalia and buy yourself a wife. Two things I know for sure. First, you will never be hungry. Second, she will never be at the night club at 1 am in the morning.

You really do have low opinion of our women folks! Why do think in Pakistan etc the women are not cognizant of rights per western society? Are you looking for a wife or a cook? You can get a the best cook for 40K a year if that is what you seek you do not need to go to Pakistan for that. And those of us who are married to "western" educated women can assure you that our wives are not in bars or clubs at 1 am

D2 my brother, I got a feeling that you went to bed many nights crying and hungry.

First of all, my wife does not cook. Her not ever caring to cook never bothered me even when we were in college. There was always the delivery service or a nearby restaurant. I most certainly can dial a phone. I also cook a lot and because my wife is a good restaurant critic I am good at it. I did not marry her for her cooking skills.

Why would this woman cook for this old man who spend most of his time on GNI yapping nonsense all damn day and night.?????

you mean that everyone who "yaps" has women or not who are cooks based on age? That could only come from a royal jackass like you.

Moses interview on Benschop radio proves my point. Joey told Moses that Janet would fight Dr. Cheddi at the breakfast table over Moses. Dr.Cheddi could not eat his breakfast in peace. These Westernized ladies are nothing but trouble.

Originally posted by Wally:Moses interview on Benschop radio proves my point. Joey told Moses that Janet would fight Dr. Cheddi at the breakfast table over Moses. Dr.Cheddi could not eat his breakfast in peace. These Westernized ladies are nothing but trouble.

Is the quarrelsome shrew JJ the template for women in the western tradition? We are 500 years out of medieval times! A wife is not property and nowhere is it written her job is to be a domestic.

What happen to D2? That woman probably order him into the kitchen to cook dinner.

I hope D2 is not like this man in the video

This is not a matter to be taken lightly. It is serious business in light of the cruelty to women in the places you mentioned. I am quite sure if you are father to daughters who has taken the time to be educated and acquire a profession you do not want them to be the servant girl to some tyrannical buffoon.

We just ordered in and our dinner from PF Chang and it will be delivered by Take out taxi in a few. Meanwhile I am preparing the movie in the blu ray player, arranging the sofas etc so we can look at our movie in the living room vs the dining room. Ours is a partnership and I hope when my daughters select their mates they find one that is willing to share in the cooking and cleaning since they will be sharing in the earning.