We are at a point where modern AAA graphics are perfectly satisfactory to a great many people. And that's why improvements are barely noticeable, especially during gameplay. Chest hair is ironically the perfect example. Like who the hell would even notice or care.

We will likely never be in that moment again when you loaded up Quake and saw fully 3d models for the first time ever.

They're saying that while it is beautiful, he/she is not that impressed because the games before it were beautiful too and the rest of the game isn't looking very innovative.

That's what I thought but it doesn't make sense to me, yes the Uncharted games were beautiful for their time and for being on the PS3 but they look terrible compared to Uncharted 4 just look at the comparison above, Nate looks like a freaking doll in Uncharted 3.

Also people need to remember that U4 is still in pre-alpha and ND will try to push it to 60fps, I don't know about you but i've never seen a game look this good in pre-alpha.

There's a difference between the art style and graphics, not being a fan of the art style is fine by me but Uncharted 4 is pushing so much tech it's silly to call it unimpressive.