If you like discussing politics and other related topics then your new home (hopefully) for doing just that can be found on Punndits.com! Come join us and help us grow Punndits into a wonderful and safe place to discuss politics with everyone.

I am not yet sold on Foles however, and laugh at me all you want, but against Dallas Foles looks very average and has looked very average. He may have had a fluke of a year last season, and if that's the case and Foles falls back to earth, it should be very interesting to see what happens with the USC guy and now Sanchez. Vick was still in my opinion the scarier QB to face, that is of course assuming Foles isn't the next coming of Kurt Warner.

I am not yet sold on Foles however, and laugh at me all you want, but against Dallas Foles looks very average and has looked very average. He may have had a fluke of a year last season, and if that's the case and Foles falls back to earth, it should be very interesting to see what happens with the USC guy and now Sanchez. Vick was still in my opinion the scarier QB to face, that is of course assuming Foles isn't the next coming of Kurt Warner.

Click to expand...

That was because, for some reason, Dallas got a tremendous pass rush on Foles those two games. He doesn't react well to pressure. Not sure why that's the only team that Dallas could get a pass rush going against.

This won't get near the jabs from the national media that signing Weeden did, even though they're essentially the same move. Weeden actually has better tools.

Click to expand...

What? I don't know if Sanchez has the makeup I want in a starter, but there was a time he looked like a nice prospect. Weeden has never had success in the nfl. And I really don't have an issue taking a chance on Weeden either.

Sanchez played in two fact championships. Sure the defense was very good but he played well in some playoff games on the road. For a young kid just entering the league that is a nice start. You can't compare What Weeden has done I nt he league.