In the Berlin district of Wedding a Leftist housing project has been attacked by immigrants of Turkish origin. The anti-fascists do not quite know how to respond: ‘They are neither Nazis nor cops, so the usual activist methods are not applicable.’ The worldview of the Left staggers…

The young artist has just moved to Wedding, as the rent in Berlin Central (Mitte) had become unaffordable. Now she is nostalgic for the perfect world at Hackescher Markt. She gets on her bike, visits an exhibition opening in Mitte. She says: ‘This place is ruled by the Turkish and the Arab mafia.’…

What is new is that that Berlin anti-fascists fear the street gangs, for example the residents of the Leftist residential project in Schererstraße 8. Located directly across from the Street Fighters headquarters.

Last weekend they were attacked, as about thirty members of the Street Fighters entered the building. The police reported that the Street Fighters smashed windows with baseball bats and destroyed furniture in the anti-fascists’ pub and information shop. A day later, two musicians who were to give a concert in the Leftist housing project, were attacked and injured…

A police officer, whose name can not be mentioned here because he is not authorized to speak to the press, comments on the attack on the Leftist housing project: ‘If it had been the Nazis, they would have told the public.’…

The lack of reaction from the anti-fascists to the violent and predominantly Turkish criminals has an apparently absurd reason. On the Internet this request from the anti-fascists circulates: ‘They are neither Nazis nor cops, so the usual activist methods are not applicable. When we know what to do, we will ask you for assistance.’

A social worker knows some people in the housing project. He says: ‘They are confused that they are not being attacked by Nazis, but by immigrants. It does not fit into their world view.’ It is said that the Street Fighters had extorted protection money from the anti-fascists, but this has not been confirmed by the police.

"The Danegeld was a tax raised to pay tribute to the Viking raiders to save a land from being ravaged."

"Danegeld is the subject of a poem by Rudyard Kipling. It ends in the following words:

'It is wrong to put temptation in the path of any nation,For fear they should succumb and go astray;So when you are requested to pay up or be molested,You will find it better policy to say: --

'We never pay any-one Dane-geld,No matter how trifling the cost;For the end of that game is oppression and shame,And the nation that plays it is lost!'"

"...people often quote two or more lines from "Dane Geld" by Rudyard Kipling:

'That if once you have paid him the Danegeld,You never get rid of the Dane.'"

"In the United Kingdom, the term 'Danegeld' has come to be used as a warning and a criticism of any coercive payment, whether in money or kind. For example as mentioned in the British House of Commons during the debate on the Belfast Agreement:

'I feared that the Belfast agreement might be built on sand, but I hoped otherwise. But as we have seen, Danegeld has been paid, and the thing about Danegeld is that one keeps on having to pay it. Concession after concession has been made. What will be the next one?'"

The Left loves multicult but multicult doesn't love them or their ways, doesn't even tolerate them the way conservatives have tolerated their stupidity. Muslims smell the weakness in modern lefties and hate their corruption as though more reason is needed than simply being non-Muslim. One flippant definition of a conservative is a liberal mugged by reality. Well, apparently German lefties mugged by reality have to "think about it" to see how they can hang on to their completely asinine world view based on total ignorance. German leftists who see fascists under every bed don't even know that the Arab world was Hitler's ally and has never apologized nor changed its mind? That Islam is a supremacist ideology?

I have always wondered how those educated to believe without question, that all cultures are equal so therefore aspire to the same ideals, would handle the inevitable Muslim display of putting the Infidel in their place.

Now I know, as do we all, that the meek shall never inherit the Earth!

Good news all round. Any abuse of the leftists is fine by me, and the 'Turks'/'Kurds' are also showing their true colours. The Left are just a Fifth Column; some will convert or be converted to Islam, others will revel in dhimmitude (they rival most Christians with their contemptible masochism) but hopefully some will realise that there is another way, and in the numbers game we'll need all the foot soldiers we can get, even if some are best used for cannon fodder ;-)

This serves them right!Those coward squatters throw molotovs and cobblestones from the cover of 300 of their likes to policemen, but confronted with just a bunch of suburban thugs, they surrender. This is no wonder: they are anemic brats from the leafy parts of town who have never been into a real brawl.

Look what the Left does when they can't blame conservatives. They sit around for a week, staring blankly at walls, drooling on themselves, in shock and unable to issue a simple statement. Their suffering is enough that they are unable to bring themselves to say that the perpetrators are victims -- although that is what they desperately want to say pursuant to their indoctrination -- their welts keep advising them otherwise though. It's different when you're the victim, isn't it? "Hans, do you sink maybe vee should read zee Quran one of zees days?" Hans: "Nein! Only Islamophobes read zee Quran!"

Much as I dislike the culture of savage, amoral competitiveness that has overtaken corporate America, the behavior of European Leftists makes me cringe at the thought of further governance by their American wannabes.

Well I can't say i feel one scintilla of pity for them. It actually takes effort to keep myself from rejoicing. I look ay it calmly and coolly and think this is the yin and yang self correction slowly balancing Tao. The question is how long will it take how much pain must be dealt before the hard and closed shells that covet leftists minds will crack. I guess a lot more. I also ask myself what would our forefathers have done to such bold and.insolent foreigners? I suppose based on historical evidence that they would have immediately dealt with this in a way that is considered unacceptable today but which obviously worked. I imagine they would have immediately had them strung up.Ask yourself child of Western traditions what a nobleman would have done? A knight? Or over in the American colonies what a pioneer colonist and settler would have done. With the approval and consent of government. We don't have no Indian problems here anymore. But now we are strangely putting ourselves back into an equivalent precarious situation that we boldly escaped from and knew instinctively was intolerable. Is it a sin to yearn for the days when such a gang of criminals-- thirty or forty strong, would have been boldly met by more bold and brave men who wouldn't ask or seek permissions to simply do what they knew was right? To protect their own and their honor. But for that you cannot be enslaved and emasculated by fear of death or pain and thus controlled and.held in bondage but must know that some things are worth dying for and life itself is not to be held more dear than loss of liberty. That is the way the West won not by words.

This is really bad news. This means that the muslims have become so strong that they do not need the help of the leftist useful idiots anymore. The leftist were good at clearing the path for them from "nazis", "islamophobes", etc... so that they could concentrate on building up a strong basis. But now it seems they have it, and they begin to discard the most-idiot-people-on-earth antifas. One just wonders what will they do now.

if someone has the leftists address we could send them some reading material.this may help them come to a natural conclusion to their predicament........that they are defending the wromg people and culture.

Friends from Western Europe - As much as I despise the current PCMC left (and find the situation funny), you now need, instead of enjoying the show, try to win some of those leftists back.

Deluded and unfit as they may be, they are still our countrymen, carriers of our cultural and genetic heritage. They may be unfit for bottle - but there may be nice women amongst them, secrectly longing for our protection, and intelligent men, capable to contribute to our society, once their eyes finally open.

There were times, when right and left - leaning people did not see each other as eternal oponents, but as limbs of one body... This should return.

Exactly, the Left deserve what they get. In the event of some form of 'civil war' errupting in either individual states or Europe wide, the Left will ultimately lose: they will either be butchered along with other native Europeans or wallow in dhimmitude; in the event of an overwhelming victory for a coalition native/right-wing/nationalists/neo-Nazis et cetera then Leftists would hopefully be held accountable for what has been little more than decades of treason. In the latter case, I would gladly welcome a pogrom against any that had desperately clung to the folly of leftist conceit regarding the 'cultural enriching' of the West.

If the vast majority of the people of Europe (obviously I am referring to native peoples and those immigrants who are not adherents of the Hashemite nihilist) are to open their eyes and act decisively to turn the tide before all hope is lost, we will have to accept that our 'guests' will have to carry out an atrocity on a grander scale than a few random rapes and beatings. Should that happen, and inevitably it will, we can but hope (not that I rejoice in the prospect of native Europeans being butchered by these barbarians) that the blow falls against the Left. Although I do wonder if the Norwegian ruling leftist elite would have adopted the 'not Nazis or cops' approach if the massacre of their own children on Utøya had been carried out by someone named Mahomet al-Breivik. The usual 'a lone criminal misinterpreting a great and peaceful religion' dirge would have filled the media.

Ah well, well done the 'Kurds'/'Turks' of Wedding for acting so presumptively; your lack of patience is helpful during this time of your lack of demographics. I am not at all alarmed as Hermes appears to be, I'm glad the Hashemite nihilists "have become so strong" at this stage, because they haven't. At the moment they have become arrogant and over-confident, two 'qualities' I would hope for in my enemies. Better now than in 20 years time. We have time for a few general elections before the demographics have tilted the balance too far in favour of the Hashemite nihilists, so the more the the Left suffers at their hands the better.

I am disinclined to believe that an attack by a street gang indicates a broad strategic determination by the "best minds" of Islam that the support of the political left is no longer necessary to facilitate Jihad. Leaving aside the question of whether one should call those plotting the overthrow of civilization the "best minds" of Islam. This is just more of the historical pattern of Koranic Islam, indulgence in ill-considered violence without serious thought as to the repercussions.

And those repercussions will eventually arrive, though perhaps not until there are Muslim cops involved in this fray somehow.

Despite that, I do not stand ready to welcome with open arms these "anti-fascists" just because they are now in conflict with Islam. The murderers in Beijing have done more than anyone else to forcibly suppress Islam and clearly demonstrate the ease with which a determined government can teach Muslims not to act up. That does not make them my allies in the fight for individual freedom.

When these leftists have had their fill of collectivism and are willing to embrace the ideals that made Western Civilization the wonder and envy of the entire world, then perhaps I will make common cause with them. If they do not leave it too late.

Hello all.As i continue to think about the differences in behavior between our contemporaries and those of the past, my thought came to mind that the reason our forebears would have instantly and fiercely come to the defense and aid of their own and swiftly punished any enemy of the peace especially insolent foreign agents of a hostile disposition is because they first of ask weren't confused about their own identity and didn't doubt their own minds whereas now moderns are inflicted and ensnared in a pernicious doubt and skepticism trap. Secondly they had a clear and absolute idea of innocence and also loyalty. The innocent such as a peaceful law abiding citizen just existing and going about their daily duties deserved defense and justice as opposed to some hostile aggressor especially some foreign agent who openly declares no loyalty or accord with established custom and culture.Our contemporaries on the weird and confused side of things against all decency and logic and loyalty, reckon the foreign hostile agents innocent and the actual law abiding citizen guilty. According to what math I am at a loss to tell you and of what they are actually guilty i also cannot fully explain except to say perhaps of being the inheritors of a great civilization. These are intangible differences but have tangible results and consequences.We have thought it harmless or at least practical to allow men such radical liberties of thought and considered it a matter of privacy and condemned those of the past who intruded into the area of a persons thoughts but i think we can now see that past discipline and desire for conformity based on traditions is not something to despise and count as positive progress to move beyond.

Well, the leftists (correctly, in my estimation) perceive the world to be in the midst of a great clash between fundamentally incompatible ideologies. On the one hand, you have Western Civilization with its conception of individual freedom and personal responsibility.

Against this you have the rejection of these ideas in favor of group rights and collective guilt. The particular disputes over which groups have what rights and which have collective guilt is far less important than their combined hostility to Western Civilization.

Islam blunders about, a 7th century anachronism ideologically blind to the central issues at stake. Eventually more and more committed collectivists will decide that the trouble it causes Western Civilization is not worth the trouble it causes their own movements. They will likely embrace the idea of white rights and brown collective guilt readily enough when the time comes.

But if so they will still be fundamentally antagonistic to the essential principles of Western Civilization.

And thus I will still be fundamentally antagonistic towards them till they reject collectivism altogether.