Bob Kuczewski wrote:Around 2am this morning I added support for posting "vimeo" videos.

Thank you for making it so easy. My comments about video uploads was reference to actually about starting a youtube channel like Margie. Would ACA want to sue me too for uploading those videos? They would be very busy if everyone did the same.

I can only fight on 5 fronts at one time. I'll have to leave these for someone else.

This was just a public service announcement addendum to our pm discussion about 4 hr. phone calls.Folks, cell phones are frying your brains. You clamor for more? You want 5G speed, speed, speed? It's at least 5 times worse. What is the rate of brain cancer these days? Then how about the poison they put in the water? https://www.heliyon.com/article/e02314

Bob, you are already fighting on more than 5 fronts, whether you know it or not.

Free rent on public land that produces millions in income to a monopolistic/exclusionary business. How much money does the Mayor of San Diego raise for re-election? 500k to a million $ and happy to see ACA continue with business as usual.

These comments are mine and mine alone and not in any way encouraged or endorsed by anyone other than me.

In federal court in Austin today, Alex Jones filed suit against various liberal media members that libeled him over the summer, including The Young Turks, the national affairs editor of Mother Jones (Andrew Kimmel), and Democratic Congressional candidate Brianna Wu.

The suit alleges each of the defendants libeled Jones repeatedly over the summer, and failed to take any corrective action, even when the rest of the press did so.

As the suit states: “The defendants launched a campaign of lies and libels against their media competitor and ideological opponent, Alex Jones. Defendants virally spread one of the worst smears that can be spread about anyone: accusing someone of one of the most infamous federal felony crimes, even though defendant knew Jones was actually the victim of that crime.”

The suit details how cybercriminals targeted Infowars and tried to plant child porn on Infowars servers in order to be produced during discovery in other legal matters, how the FBI’s investigation cleared Infowars and identified Jones as the targeted victim of the cyberattack, and how the defendants then lied to the world about what happened by falsely accusing the victim, Alex Jones, of being the perpetrator.

Alex Jones & Robert Barnes are live on air breaking down this lawsuit. Be sure to visit the Free America Law Center today!

“For too long, the media feels it can tell any lie or libel about Alex Jones that it wants. Jones, as a strong advocate of both free press and free speech, resisted calls for suing those who continued to lie and libel him. But enough is enough. It is time to fight back. It is time for the truth to come out. Jones only sued those who refused requests for retractions and corrections,” said Robert Barnes, the attorney for Alex Jones.

“Other defendants who similarly fail to retract or correct can look forward to future lawsuits. The media may think it’s Goliath, but it’s time it met David on the battlefield.”

Bob Kuczewski wrote:Finally, if anyone reads the complaint, you will find the bulk of their "evidence" are pages from the U.S. Hawks (including both posts and videos). They are reading our site constantly, and they would surely like to shut us down. So please be mindful not to give them any help. Also, please use personal messaging (or the good old telephone) if you want to share strategic advice about the case.

This could be a national free speech story. It already reads like a novel. 'The Chief leans over the table... Blue.. do what ya gotta do... damn the law!I don't know much about strategy other than tell the truth to the jury that will never be convened. This isn't a lawsuit about libel and slander except that the petitioners are committing libel and slander. They do it their court filings and they do it for the camera. If only in Rosa Park's time, everyone had a camera..

So in lieu of strategic advise I'll just play the devil's advocate and ask you the one question the plaintiffs must prove to prevail in their action. I suppose in 2 days of deposition they had to have asked you this about a million times, about a million different ways: ' Mr. Kuczewski, Isn't it true, that everything you have written since the beginning of time has been a flat out lie?'Thais what the complaint says and the whole case depends on proving that one fact. This will never go to a jury. It's all about putting a financial squeeze on you to make you shut up.

A corporation, a made up entity expressing itself as having human rights. is using the strong arm of a government court to silence a human citizen of his civil rights.If there was any justice this would have been thrown out of court already. The Court runs on money and politics. The court of public opinion runs on free speech.

The plaintiffs claim that your mere presence in a public park causes them severe grief and loss of income.If the plaintiffs want to prove that it would seem that they need to open up their books. How much money were they making off of public infrastructure/land before and after BK?When does the cross examination begin? Oh, that's right. Sometime after the jury is chosen..