For what it's worth, I second the motion. If more of the "basic" stuff was in a FAQ section boiled down to its essential posts, more of the resident knowledge base could be tapped by new users (like me) for odd questions that aren't covered in the FAQ section.

For a 'Proper' FAQ, someone would have to write, illustrate, and post up the dissertation,
Then the moderators would have to LOCK THE THREAD to keep it from being diluted by everyone with a question or 'Idea' or argument... or just wanting to pad their post count!

I'm all for it, and I'll contribute if asked, but I don't think I would like doing an 'FAQ' dissertation and then having every guy that can type post 'Corrections' or 'Comments' about the project.

Lots of time, effort & resources go into doing a full length dissertation on any subject, and it's kind of counter productive to have just 'Anyone' jump in with any half baked idea...

I'm thinking that a person can take one of those threads and clean it up, then send it (probably via e-mail) to the original poster(s) to verify correctness. Once correct, submit to moderator for posting as a locked thread. What do you think?

I have some how to stuff, also the top ten, or 25 questions, and some hints, I am still working on a lot of it, but mostly I don't get a lot of time for Internet stuff when I am wrenching on the Jeep(s)

As for threads, I agree, there would be a lot of chime in. I offer this stuff up... if it helps, great, if not, then so be it. I am not an expert and how I do things might not be everyones way of doing it, but it does get done and so far, no major catastrophes...