wow. reposted old post and lost rewrite. hmmm… am also journalist studied under Joyce Campbell (PBS-Chicano Ex. Prod.), Arthur Hook, and followed Mike Kirk’s legacy out of school. Really. So girls, listen up (Hi Ellen), ready as needed but endless posts as to religion academically have been ignored because of one thing we share with Fox – egotism. Take it from a pro. Ross.

Another Bill O’Fallacy – the implication that if Fox doesn’t help Santorum, the implication that Fox is therefore not a right wing station is a false conclusion. Fox IS a right wing cable that didn’t help Rick Santorum. See Bill twist words?
I would like to invite any News Hounds fellow commentors to review this sight on logic: http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/

At it’s simplest, Rick is recognizing a known fact. Fox isn’t fair and balanced. Also, the Republican and Republiklan candidates for the nom are such a fricking parody of what it’s supposed to be. Who needs Saturday Night Live when Mitt Romney shows up to hang out with y’all. Cheesy grits is a joke in itself. That’s what I’m going to call Mitt for now on. That’s settled. Looking forward to the next debate so we can get down to the Rick Santorum vs, Cheesy Grits stage. It’s tough though. These guys are both pretty Cheesy.

Eric Bolling’s gimmick really IS stupid. It just is. Broadcasters, print, already recognize this rather (recognized) stunt, but simply as a matter of normal TV new and opinion delivery regardless of any bias, or not, is simply already known to be sub-broadcast news at the national level down to the local level. I’m not addressing this as a Fox issue, although it also is. The other topic is just the blatant lameness of not knowing it just isn’t Kosher, nor how blatant the fallacy is.
It’s my degree, but I never did nor would go the commercial local or national TV for-profit news in any capacity (it’s a world unto itself, and I am something else. Why did I tout the ‘Fallacy’ screen name and constantly whining about critical thinking at my favorite media analysis site? I hope someday just to be able to start feeding ideas on stuff that I see when I get back to watching Fox (There are great guest blogs here, but I’m working on a different project, but want to chip in somehow.
NewsHounds IS part of the valid realm of news (media but news here ) analysis. Fox Nation, by the way, is not it’s counterpart over there where the orcs hang out.
By accepted description and whatever, critical thinking here is applied to seek the truth, and there are both rational secular, rational spiritual/philosophical, and religious (the good part RATIONALES (how do I underline here instead of cap?) for goodness, period. Honest media analysis for good, and specifically WHAT News Hounds addresses, is vital. You have Media Matters and New Hounds. Others, Huff, Daily/Colbert, etc., but this is an important (an absolute here) part of an important picture. In a not-snotty, but valid way, I think what I say is true. KEEP up the good work and everyone stay here and fight the fight. Fkn’a. I spend every day doing it “down the street”.
(underline implied ha ha : ) )

Delusional. Grandiose. Sold out. Anti-reason. “Wolf in sheep’s clothing”. Factually incorrect on the history of Christianity and Roman Catholicism, and the original Jesus/Kingdom of God (not “Heaven” by virtue of scholarly translation and study). Liar. For a buck. For being mentally ill in an evil manifestation of such (secular).
Bill O’Reilly. Nizkor.

Anne, you are absolutely right. Although I don’t believe in a personified Devil, there is a very logical case that Michelle is doing evil, whether in a secular, spiritual, philosophical, or religious sense (by Christian standards, for example). It also reflects a mental state or condition, but regardless, when it manifests itself in evil-doing, it is still not Good.

Monica’s language, to a profiler, pretty much says she thinks Breitbart is her cockstar. But then Fox hires ’em because they are playing the slut-look part, so why not just hire one? How nauseating. Turned on by Andrew Breitbart. He was a dildo, Monica probably has an Andrew dildo.

Fact. If you really break down the sum total of Breitbart, he was a scared pussy. Lying fucking coward. Cheap shot asshole. Chickenshit hypocrite. Un-American pseudonazi. And how often do you hear me calling someone names here at N.H.? In this case, it’s true. Subjective word insults are valid.

Puhleeeeze MItt, follow Bill’s advice! It will be even more fun making fun of Willard the Moron. (You don’t need brains to make bucks, just sell your soul instead.)
‘Wow, those horse deovers are really high end’.
Still waiting for Mitt to change which side he parts his hair on to mess with his staff’s heads.

Like it or not, when someone famous dies, the media tends to overlook many persons’ shortcomings as some sort of respect in a sort of eulogy-type state. Not that I agree, and especially in this case. And certainly Fox is not going to say negative things as they are biased as can be, and they will substitute obituary page delivery for actual objective news.
I never am happy about someone’s death, and at 43, maybe Breitbart might have seen the light some day. Or continued to be easy pickings for academic takedown of his crap. And I am sad for is family. But he was who he was, and in part, he was a destructive person who used evil to advance his “cause”. His unholy use of lies and fallacies certainly wasn’t Fox-Christian, nor even Judeo-Christian.
Fox is the rising Reich. Nizkor.