Contents

Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must spend at least one week on pee review before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time and require no review (though it is still recommended).

Weak against -- Terribly sorry, but this just won't do. Not so much for the content as it is for the formatting. That can really make or break an article. Fix that, and I'll reconsider. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 18:29, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Nomination aswell as a seemingly implide vote For, I really like this concept, and it was just brought to my attention that this is the "original". --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 23:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Against, it's almost exactly the same as the last time it appeared on VFH, when my shoulders creased upwards in a meh. Love the pics, though. I was told that there wasn't film in the camera. Bastards.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 02:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

weak for. call me a length nazi. it's not the size it's what you do with it. is i lie wimin tell. it's funny, but there is a lot more funny that could be squeezed out, i want potential reached! - jack mort |cunt| talk - 21:05, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Self-nom and For This is the first time I have ever nommed one of my own articles on VFH. I chose carefully which article I nommed for VFH, and I chose this one, as I feel it is funny, but not in-jokey or cliche. --GeneralInsineratehymn 01:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Comment."In the decades since the discovery of DNA and the subsequent mapping of the human genome questions have arisen as to whether traits of personality, including narcissism, are partially or fully determined by one’s own genes." Hilarious. t o m p k i n s blah.ﺞوﻦוףהՃՄண்ஸފއހวอฏม+տtrade websites23:04, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

For and submit I feel that this is a very well laid out article filled with clever and ironic jokes from the start and throughout. Plus, I believe it shows beyond a shadow of a reasonable doubt, that Intelligent Designerists are correct in everything they say. Weri long wang 19:30, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

I critized his signature, which is a bit too long. That has nothing to do with his against votes for all articles without reasonable explanations - it’s like he has OCD or something.Weri long wang 13:06, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Oppose How is this supposed to be funny? "Witch-Hunting For Fun and Profit has seen many editions with numerous authors adding to it, keeping it forever relevant and up-to-date. The original manuscript is said to have been based on the journals of Tomás de Torquemada. Since then, it has been passed down generation to generation, notable contributions made by Samuel Parris, Betty Parris, Abigail Williams, William Griggs, and Joseph McCarthy." It has a section just for this. --Endgame 22:19, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Comment According the the VFH archives (check the oldest ones), this article was already featured (on March 14th, 2005). --Composure1 04:19, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

For an original way of mocking him. The previous version that was featured was what is know known as George Dubya Bush, before it was moved to the new location to make way for this page. •Spang•☃•talk•06:57, 9 Jan 2007

For, it's the article I would have written if I had any idea what I was doing.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 07:05, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

For - this is actually really nicely done - David Gerard 08:41, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Featured, Apparently (sort of) There's no point in further voting, as it was already featured. I'm stealing Rc's job because Crazyswordsman got to do the template. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 03:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Score: +11.5 games missed due to Mastercard/Verizon/HH Gregg/ESPN commercial shoot

Self-Nom and For. If we can't get this featured in time for his next playoff loss, maybe we can get this featured in time for the Super Bowl. That is, of course, assuming this article is worthy.--<<>> 02:04, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

For He got tripped by one of his own linemen and still beat the Patriots. I hate him. The Humbled Master 23:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

For Although I know nothing about football.. I somehow found this funny. It's probably the narration/rant style that I love. —Braydieat 00:43, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

For Let's see if Peyton can win the superbowl and get featured on Uncyclopedia all int he smae day we should save this for after the superbowl win or lose it'll be timely.--71.72.210.124 03:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Oppose I can't find the humor for this to be an FA article. --Endgame 07:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

For. Not because it's good, but because we want to overhype him so he'll lose the Superbowl. I hate, hate, hate, Peyton Manning. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 23:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)