(a) Jesus Christ A study of who Jesus was and proof Jesus is the Son of Elohiym. A study of Jesus in the Old Testament as Son-Yahweh. The messenger of Yahweh is common in the Old Testament and was found to be Jesus.

The Author discovered many years ago reading KJV Scripture electronically with interlinear Greek and Hebrew how inconsistent the Hebrew words to English words were.
The Author thought a single Hebrew word should be translated with a single English word, if this was possible. Instead the Author saw the Hebrew words having over a dozen
English words, suggesting the Scriptues have multiple meanings in context. This really upset the Author, and it spoils the meanings in Scripture.
The Author was glad to discover Jeff Benner had the same feelings with translations, and produced a Genesis translation mechanically translating every Hebrew word with a single
English word. It is possible to do this, and makes the Scripture words more consistent in their meaning.

Some topics covered by Jeff Benner but re-written by the author are listed below:

Many people say Ellen White never wrote Hebrew, thus because of their bias, they assume her English is modern English only.
If we look at the way Scripture is translated in her passages, we can begin to study the English against Hebrew words to test
if her English is actually consistently following Hebrew words instead. If true, the SOP would actually be a Hebrew-English translation.

This would be great news for anyone who finds reading Hebrew English interlinear Scriptures difficult, we need only study carefully the SOP instead to see what our Hebrew Scriptures really mean.
The SOP makes understanding Scripture easy!

This study proves Ellen White was inspired, testing her work in English matches the meanings in Ancient Hebrew , because the Holy Spirit inspired the messages.

This study compares how completely inspired these messengers were. Since Martin Luther has much material on the Internet, as does Ellen White, this is a study
to compare how complete both of these messengers are against Ancient Hebrew meanings of words.

As a result of this study, and reading Martin Luther material, the Author has developed much respect for him. The German translation by Martin Luther is perhaps the best example of a translation there is....
Better than KJV, better than any translation the Author knows. Martin Luther's translation is pure and consistent, mechanically translating each Hebrew faithfully. We know Martin Luther was a Christian and was saved
for the kingdom, believing in Jesus according to the light he knew. Hence the Author trusts his translation of Hebrew to German, better than other so called translations. In fact Martin Luther really is a "father of translations"
and tells us how translating should be done....not dynamically...not inconsistently...not believing Hebrew words have multiple meanings in context...God bless Martin Luther and his example of how Bible translations should be. Shalom

Index to words in the comparision study:-

(1) Ab----------------Father & Fruit

(2) El------------------Strong Authority

(3) Elohiym ------------Heavenly Powers

(4) Echad----------------Unity or united

(5) Tamiyd---------------Daily or continual

(6) Chata and Chataah ----Sin and Sin-offering

(7) Tsachaq ---------------- Mock & Laugh

(8) Torah ----------------Teachings & Rain

(9) cela and twusr---Rock similes of Jesus, Father

(10) Qahal ---------- Assembly or Church

These studies look at how the Spirit of Prophecy confirms our understanding of Scripture.
This prevents our mind wandering off the wrong track with Scripture, especially if we have inspired writings to keep us on the correct path.
Much of the problem is SOP never writes about translation issues, and accepts Scripture translations in the light they are presented.

Readers cannot assume that when SOP quotes Scripture in some translation, that the Scripture quoted in English, is a perfect rendering of the Hebrew.
The Scripture words first penned in Hebrew do not contain error, it is the translation process by men, that may contain confusion. The SOP accepts the poor
translations in the light they are presented, so as not to offend the reader with child like faith. Knowing more knowledge about truth is not always necessary,
or benefical for salvation. Many come to Jesus in the light they have and are judged by the experiences they have in Jesus.

However a casual reader will find a "babe" like understanding and that is OK, for we are measured by the light we live up to. But we are also expected in Scripture to grow (as a Christian tree grows), and study Jesus more and more, looking for deeper drafts of His truth.
This can also be obtained from the SOP, in fact the SOP has truth hidden at many levels for different believers reading SOP and Scripture.
How can all this complex material be? Because the Holy Spirit inspired the SOP, only Ellen White wrote them down. Her English is actually a translation of Hebrew into English.

A look at SOP, confirming that Scripture shows us that sinning has two stages, for the babe coming to GOD the first time, "sinning" is transgression of the moral law, and for the mature believer "missing" is about a relationship in Jesus.

A look at SOP, confirming that Scripture shows us two Hebrew words for "sin". One is "chata", the other is "chattaah".
Sadly in NT translations both Hebrew words are translated the same English word "sin" spoiling things. Does SOP correct this ?

SOP uses a term "almighty" which is a specific translated word in Scripture, known as "Shadday".
Does SOP consistently show what this term refers to? or is this term not related to a specific member of the Godhead?.
Comments by Church scholars are shown.

A well known member of the Godhead, is the Father.
But what is not well known is the Hebrew word "eloah" also means "Father".
This study compares the church scholar criticism of the "Shadday" with "Eloah" and just how hard it is to prove
this Hebrew word is supposed to about "a Father God".