People like this discredit and make any alternative theories look crazy to what happened those 3 buildings. All of this about "lasers" is nonsense, I've looked at alot of footage of the towers collapsing from different angles and you see the "spire" falling. What's also in all the footage however is evidence of controlled demolition.

People like this discredit and make any alternative theories look crazy to what happened those 3 buildings. All of this about "lasers" is nonsense, I've looked at alot of footage of the towers collapsing from different angles and you see the "spire" falling. What's also in all the footage however is evidence of controlled demolition.

People like this discredit and make any alternative theories look crazy to what happened those 3 buildings. All of this about "lasers" is nonsense, I've looked at alot of footage of the towers collapsing from different angles and you see the "spire" falling. What's also in all the footage however is evidence of controlled demolition.

The fact that it looks a bit like a controlled demolition does not provide evidence for anything. How do you know that controlled demolitions don't look like collapses caused by aeroplanes?

Y'know, if we have death lasers that are used to disentigrate our own buildings, killing numerous people in the process, then why the hell haven't we used them to take care of our little problems in places such as, I dunno...

Iran
Iraq
Afghanistan
Cuba
North Korea
And just about every other country that hates us?

Maybe the "jumpers" were jumping out and trying to take their burning, singed clothes off caused by a plane carrying thousands of gallons of fuel exploding on the floor above you creating a huge fucking fireball?

Maybe the "jumpers" were jumping out and trying to take their burning, singed clothes off caused by a plane carrying thousands of gallons of fuel exploding on the floor above you creating a huge fucking fireball?

There were a variety of things that happened. The reasons for people jumping range and vary.

It's believed that a few of the Jumpers perhaps didn't intend to jump. There are images and video of people on the upper floors breaking windows and hanging out stacked ontop of one another, gripping the sides of the building for air as the smoke and heat rises throughout the building. Some could have tripped or lost their grip and fell, some could have been pushed out by accident or desperation.

As far as anyone knows no one jumped out of the tower because their clothes were burning or they themselves were actually on fire (although this happened in quite a few instances to others, none of the Jumpers were observed to actually be 'on fire') rather they were subjected to intense heat and smoke, so much so that they would rather have jumped that be baked alive in what was essentially a hundred story chimney.

Some people did strip their clothes though, took off shirts and suits to try and keep themselves cool, some of the Jumpers lost them on the way down, although probably unintentionally.

This call is an example of the horrible conditions they were subjected to inside the towers.

"It may be, she suggests, that they are in a reflexive reaction against a pain comparable to that experienced by inadvertently placing one’s hand on a hot burner"
nono taking clothes off isn't a reflex comparable to pulling your hand away from something, which you do without thinking about it. even the tiniest things she says are crazy.

We’ve all heard the “official conspiracy theory” of the Death Star attack. We all know about Luke Skywalker and his ragtag bunch of rebels, how they mounted a foolhardy attack on the most powerful, well-defended battle station ever built. And we’ve all seen the video over, and over, and over, of the one-in-a-million shot that resulted in a massive chain reaction that not just damaged, but completely obliterated that massive technological wonder.

Like many Americans, I was fed this story when I was growing up. But as I watched the video, I began to realize that all was not as it seemed. And the more I questioned the official story, the deeper into the rabbit hole I went.

Presented here are some of the results of my soul-searching regarding this painful event. Like many citizens, I have many questions that I would like answered: was the mighty Imperial government really too incompetent to prevent a handful of untrained nerf-herders from destroying one of their most prized assets? Or are they hiding something from us? Who was really behind the attack? Why did they want the Death Star destroyed? No matter what the answers, we have a problem.

Below is a summary of my book, Uncomfortable Questions: An Analysis of the Death Star Attack, which presents compelling evidence that we all may be the victims of a fraud of immense proportions.

Uncomfortable Questions about the Death Star Attack

1) Why were a handful of rebel fighters able to penetrate the defenses of a battle station that had the capability of destroying an entire planet and the defenses to ward off several fleets of battle ships?

2) Why did Grand Moff Tarkin refuse to deploy the station’s large fleet of TIE Fighters until it was too late? Was he acting on orders from somebody to not shoot down the rebel attack force? If so, who, and why?

3) Why was the rebel pilot who supposedly destroyed the Death Star reported to be on the Death Star days, maybe hours, prior to its destruction? Why was he allowed to escape, and why were several individuals dressed in Stormtrooper uniforms seen helping him?

4) Why has there not been an investigation into allegations that Darth Vader, the second-ranking member of the Imperial Government, is in fact the father of the pilot who allegedly destroyed the Death Star?

5) Why did Lord Vader decide to break all protocols and personally pilot a lightly armored TIE Fighter? Conveniently, this placed Lord Vader outside of the Death Star when it was destroyed, where he was also conveniently able to escape from a large-sized rebel fleet that had just routed the Imperial forces. Why would Lord Vader, one of the highest ranking members of the Imperial Government, suddenly decide to fly away from the Death Star in the middle of a battle? Did he know something that the rest of the Imperial Navy didn’t?

6) How could any pilot shoot a missile into a 2 meter-wide exhaust port, let alone a pilot with no formal training, whose only claim to fame was his ability to “bullseye womprats” on Tatooine? This shot, according to one pilot, would be “impossible, even for a computer.” Yet, according to additional evidence, the pilot who allegedly fired the missile turned off his targeting computer when he was supposedly firing the shot that destroyed the Death Star. Why have these discrepancies never been investigated, let alone explained?

7) Why has their been no investigation into evidence that the droids who provided the rebels with the Death Star plans were once owned by none other than Lord Vader himself, and were found, conveniently, by the pilot who destroyed the Death Star, and who is also believed to be Lord Vader’s son? Evidence also shows that the droids were brought to one Ben Kenobi, who, records indicate, was Darth Vader’s teacher many years earlier! Are all these personal connections between the conspirators and a key figure in the Imperial government supposed to be coincidences?

8) How could a single missile destroy a battle station the size of a moon? No records, anywhere, show that any battle station or capital ship has ever been destroyed by a single missile. Furthermore, analysis of the tape of the last moments of the Death Star show numerous small explosions along its surface, prior to it exploding completely! Why does all evidence indicate that strategically placed explosives, not a single missile, is what destroyed the Death Star?

The sad thing is that that DOES make sense, and more sense than every 9/11 conspiracy combined. Also technically speaking the Death Star's destruction more or less was an "inside job" since afterward the emperor said that "everything went as forseen".

Conspiracy Theorists bring up the fact that the towers were the first steel high rises to fall from fire in history. The fact is the towers had other firsts that day they never seem to include.

There were a lot of firsts for the WTC. In all the history of high-rise fires, not one has ever been hit with a plane traveling 500 miles an hour and had its fire proofing removed from its trusses. In all the history of high-rise fires, not one has ever had its steel columns which hold lateral load sheared off by a 767. In all the history of high-rise fires, not one has ever been a building which had its vertical load bearing columns in its core removed by an airliner. For Building 7, in all the history of high-rise fires, not one has ever been left for 6-7 hours with its bottom floors on fire with structural damage from another building collapse. Not the Madrid/Windsor tower did not have almost 40 stories of load on its supports after being hit by another building which left a 20 story gash. The Madrid tower lost portions of its steel frame from the fire. Windsor's central core was steel reinforced concrete. In all the history of high-rise fires, not one has ever been without some fire fighters fighting the fires.

I could go on with the "Firsts" but you get the drift. The statement that the WTC buildings were the first high-rise buildings to collapse from fire is deceptive because it purposely doesn't take those factors into account.