Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International by Steve A. Yetiv, Patrick James

This edited quantity breaks new flooring via innovatively drawing on a number of disciplines to reinforce our figuring out of diplomacy and conflict. the growth of information throughout disciplines and the more and more blurred limitations within the genuine international either permit and insist considering throughout highbrow borders. whereas multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary are popular buzz phrases, remarkably few books enhance them. but doing so can sharpen and extend our viewpoint on educational and actual global matters and difficulties. This e-book deals the main entire remedy thus far and is a useful source for college students, students and practitioners.

This quantity examines the space among agreements and genuine peace. It deals various factors for the successes and screw ups of the 3 tactics - in South Africa, Northern eire and Israel-Palestine - and gives ancient and comparative views at the failure of the center East peace method.

This quantity of the Peacebuilding in comparison venture examines the assets of the armed clash and coup within the Solomon Islands sooner than and after the flip of the millennium. The neighborhood tips project to Solomon Islands (RAMSI) has been a thorough peacekeeping operation, targeting construction ‘core pillars’ of the fashionable nation.

Roselle analyzes how political leaders of robust states use media to give an explanation for army defeats. The circumstances of the U.S. in Vietnam and the Soviet Union in Afghanistan spotlight the position of significant energy identification, family politics, and media constitution.

Additional resources for Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations

Example text

Realists/Neorealists assume that world politics is cyclical; that wars and conflicts recur; that cooperation is perpetually difficult to achieve; and that not much changes at the heart of world politics (Waltz 1979; Mearsheimer 2001). A. , Keohane and Nye 2011; Held and McGrew 2007; Rosenau 2003; Russett and Oneal 2001). ” Do they, in turn, cause inter-state tensions? Under what conditions? All of these claims, be they theoretical or empirical, beg questions about history and change. For example, one major difference between IR theoretical schools has to do with conflict in world politics.

Assessing the extent to which these claims or assumptions are on target or are useful requires some understanding of history. Realists/Neorealists assume that world politics is cyclical; that wars and conflicts recur; that cooperation is perpetually difficult to achieve; and that not much changes at the heart of world politics (Waltz 1979; Mearsheimer 2001). A. , Keohane and Nye 2011; Held and McGrew 2007; Rosenau 2003; Russett and Oneal 2001). ” Do they, in turn, cause inter-state tensions? Under what conditions?

It is largely concerned with revealing why, at a macro-level that can span centuries, countries evolved along different developmental paths; and how state institutions emerged from enduring legacies of political struggles (see Fioretos 2011). Such work is important to contemporary comparativists in political science as well as to IR scholars who are interested in the links between sub-national and international phenomena. This is in part because, as Thelen suggests, “knowing how institutions were constructed provides insights into how they might come apart” (1999: 400).