This is NOT a thread about the worst fighter. I'm looking for fighters who simply didn't stand out from the crowd. They had no glaring weaknesses, no major strengths. Their careers were neither particularly good nor particularly bad. They were not really interesting, and their fighting style wasn't markedly different or entertaining.

This is NOT a thread about the worst fighter. I'm looking for fighters who simply didn't stand out from the crowd. They had no glaring weaknesses, no major strengths. Their careers were neither particularly good nor particularly bad. They were not really interesting, and their fighting style wasn't markedly different or entertaining.

I'm looking for the Boxer in the Gray Flannel Suit. Who is he?

The type of fighter you're describing sounds an aweful lot like Michael Nunn. Although Nunn was a great fighter, he was often tedious or unimpressive to watch. If you don't believe me, watch his fight against Marlon Starling, 1991. If sleeping pills won't knock you out, then that fight sure as hell will.

Probably. I don't think he had quite thirty fights though. I couldn't even say for sure if he's still active since Lockett battered him. Bottom line is he lost to the guys with winning records and beat the guys with losing records. Which is the kind of thing you're after?

This is NOT a thread about the worst fighter. I'm looking for fighters who simply didn't stand out from the crowd. They had no glaring weaknesses, no major strengths. Their careers were neither particularly good nor particularly bad. They were not really interesting, and their fighting style wasn't markedly different or entertaining.