Our use of cookies

Options

Back

We use cookies to help our site work, to understand how it is used, and to tailor the adverts presented on our site. By clicking “Accept” below, you agree to us doing so. You can read more in our
cookie notice. Or, if you do not agree, you can click Manage below to access other choices.

You can choose whether or not to accept advertising cookies from our advertising partner Google using the buttons below. If you choose not to, you will still see adverts on our site, because they help us to fund it, but those adverts will not be tailored to you. You can also choose not to accept session and analytics cookies through the settings in your browser, but some parts of our site might stop working as a result. You can also learn more in our
cookie notice.

Scotland should not have to pay twice to mitigate brutal Tory policies, says Mhairi Black

Our columnist is furious that the Scottish Parliament has to fill in financial gaps to give people what they are due by diverting cash from other crucial areas.

Share

by Mhairi Black

06:00, 7 Aug 2017Updated22:32, 6 Aug 2017

More than 7m people in their 30s and 40s will lose out by £10k each after Tories increased state pension age earlier than planned(Image: PA)

Remember 2014? Scotland was having a real debate about our future. Claims and counter claims were made. One of the most heated areas of debate was welfare and pensions.

The Yes campaign argued – based on actual spending figures north and south of the border – that the social security system would be more affordable in an independent Scotland.

The Labour-Tory No campaign argued that it was only by “pooling and sharing” our resources across the UK that pensions would continue to be paid.

Well, that argument seems long forgotten now – at least by those who made it. Thanks to the Tories – with the support of their Lib Dem partners – by the time all cuts in benefits are in place by 2021 Scotland will be facing a reduction of £2 billion. Every year.

Work and Pensions Secretary David Gauke has dipped pockets of working people(Image: Getty)

That is not including the hundreds of thousands of women born in the 1950s who are being deprived of their pensions, and are told that they must carry on working until they are 65.

Although we – and they - agree on the need to equalize pension age, it is the greatly accelerated timetable which is completely unfair – especially given many of these women were finalising their retirement plans.

The inspirational WASPI campaign – Women Against State Pension Inequality – has highlighted this injustice and I’ve been proud to help them. In Holyrood and at Westminster, the SNP fully supports their campaign, seeking pensions justice for women all across the UK.

That campaign would have so much more momentum if other political parties in Scotland got behind it.

Read More

Unfortunately – once again - Labour are dancing to the Tories’ tune. They have been taken in by bogus Tory claims that the Scottish Parliament has the powers for us to mitigate this.

We have looked carefully at whether we could do something, as we have done in the past, such as ensuring no one in Scotland has to pay the hated Bedroom Tax.

We’re now spending well over £100m a year mitigating some of the worst of the Westminster welfare cuts. But nowhere in the devolved settlement does it offer a practical, workable solution to deal with the narrow definition of women who are facing this injustice. But even if it could, should it?

Filling this gap means money being diverted from elsewhere. Do you think the WASPI women who have paid into the Treasury for decades and expected their state pension, want to see money not going to Scottish schools or hospitals because the Tories in Westminster won’t do the right thing?

So why do Scottish Labour think it is right that people in Scotland should pay twice, to receive social security from the Westminster system that they have paid into? Why are they not turning their eyes to the Tories who took this decision?

Read More

We’ve been here before – with the rape clause, a despicable policy, which requires women who became pregnant through rape to demonstrate that to an official in order to receive tax credits. Ruth Davidson said that taxpayers in Scotland should pay twice to mitigate this policy.

If Labour and their Tory allies believe that the Scottish Parliament should be responsible for funding these policies – and I agree with them – then they should devolve the funding that goes with them. Instead, at every turn, they have sought to let Westminster off the hook.

The rape clause? - Westminster’s mess, but the Scottish Parliament should fix it at Scottish taxpayers’ expense. Depriving women of their state pensions? - Westminster’s mess, but the Scottish Parliament should fix it at Scottish taxpayers’ expense.

Presumably, if the Tories were to turn around and say they were ending pension payments in Scotland altogether, Scottish Labour would just say that Holyrood should step in and pay them.