I am trying to keep a list of published votes on OOXML in order to get a rough estimate of the situation. Information is mostly based on this website (noooxml.org). Unfortunately, there still seem to be a lot of unclear votes. However, if anyone can provide me with additional information, I will update the list.

I am trying to keep a list of published votes on OOXML in order to get a rough estimate of the situation. Information is mostly based on this website (noooxml.org). Unfortunately, there still seem to be a lot of unclear votes. However, if anyone can provide me with additional information, I will update the list.
Current summary:
P-Members (40):
3 "yes", 5 "no", 5 "abstain", 27 unclear
O-Members:
3 "yes", 1 "no", 1 "abstain", 2 unclear

Switzerland voted "Approval with comments", with just a single vote making it so (75.4%), and this after massive last-day committee stacking. One or two potential members who would have voted "Disapproval with comments" or some form of "Abstain" were not allowed to join because they left it too long or didn't check that their application was being processed.

According to the votes I gathered, within the JTC1 group of P-Members there are now 7 votes for "yes/approve", 13 votes for "no/disapprove", 5 abstains and 16 votes that have not been published yet. Thus a 2/3rds majority has become impossible (26 "yes"-votes needed to counter 13 "no"-votes, however only 23 "yes"-votes possible).

Thanks to everyone providing me with information.
I will continue to fill in the gaps until the official result is published.

Malta (P member) voted yes with comments, though I don't think it was formally published. Most of the valid comments were rejected, leaving only a small number of minor comments. The voting representatives were the head of Microsoft Malta, someone from the company which was Microsoft's agent for Malta until they opened their Malta office, someone from University who gave a counter-argument exactly identical to Microsoft's response to the India standards body, a lawyer, a representative of government, and a member of the local Linux user group, who provided all the comments about this DIS. With only one exception, everyone except the Linux guy voted exactly as Microsoft did. For one comment, the government representative agreed but only after changing from technical to general comment. That too was defeated.