Hutchinson de-annexation: Reason for skepticism

Wednesday

PROPOSALS TO add or subtract property from local government jurisdictions affect taxpayers and the public's pocketbook. Such matters must be discussed in the open, not behind closed doors.

For that reason, an unexpected measure to de-annex Hutchinson Island property for the city of Savannah merits healthy skepticism at this point.

It's impossible to tell whether the consequences of such an action would be a net benefit or negative to the public - largely because the people who are closest to the proposal aren't saying much.

State Rep. Ron Stephens, R-Savannah, said Monday he plans to submit legislation to de-annex property on Hutchinson Island from the city of Savannah. He said he's doing it at the request of Chatham County Commission Chairman Al Scott.

Mr. Scott did not return calls for comment from the newspaper. But Mr. Stephens said an unnamed developer plans to develop a mixed-use development on land east of the Westin Savannah Harbor Golf Resort and Spa.

The developer believes he will have an easier time getting the required permitting for the project from the county, as opposed to the city, Mr. Stephens said. Without more details, however, that doesn't seem to add up.

It is true, however, that property taxes would be lower after de-annexation, as the owner would no longer pay city property taxes in addition to county property taxes.

News of potential de-annexation hit City Hall like a bombshell. Mr. Stephens, who chairs the county's legislative delegation inn Atlanta, said he had been given the impression that the city didn't have a problem with this plan. But the exact opposite is true. "I am adamantly opposed to it," Mayor Edna Jackson said. "We don't know anything about it."

The obvious lack of communication between Mr. Scott and Ms. Jackson is troubling. These two top leaders may have differences when it comes to sales tax allocations and paying for police services. But they must work together when it comes to potential economic development that brings jobs and opportunity to the community.

Commissioner Helen Stone said one reason Mr. Scott is pushing for de-annexation is the lack of a fire station on the island. She also said much of Hutchinson's infrastructure is provided by the county. If that's the case, then it raises a question of tax fairness.

There are currently two proposals for the island, a convention center hotel, which could receive public funding support, and a marina by John Cay, the former president and CEO of Palmer & Cay.

Mr. Cay said Tuesday he is not pushing de-annexation and has no position either way. That leaves the hotel as a possibily. Or perhaps there's another project in the wings.

More facts and clarity are needed. De-annexation isn't an easy process - and rightly so. It generally requires the consent of affected property owners and governing authorities.

Additional information is required before the public can reach an informed opinion - and, before Mr. Stephens and other lawmakers can make an informed decision that benefits the greater community.

Never miss a story

Choose the plan that's right for you.
Digital access or digital and print delivery.