Lawsuit by Robert Kennedy, Jr., and Del Bigtree against the United States Health and Human Services ends in settlement in which the HHS admits that it has NOT conducted the necessary vaccine safety research over the past 30 years! This admittance – that the HHS has NOT been following one of the stipulations of the 1986 NCVIA – is a MAJOR first step, that now invites the opportunity for further lawsuits against the government for lack of safety research.

The 1986 NCVIA afforded legal immunity to the pharmaceutical industry, and so, the incentive to make vaccines safer was removed. In order to remedy this, Congress stipulated that the HHS should report on their improvements to vaccine safety every 2 years, beginning in 1986.

RFK Jr. and ICAN’s Freedom of Information Act Request, as ordered by the court, show that the HHS has not been doing its job. The only agency tasked with improving and studying vaccine safety has NOT being doing so.

This is an unmitigated failure of vaccine safety oversight on the part of the HHS!

Big Pharma’s Big Fines – how can an industry that regularly engages in criminal activity be trusted?

“In the last few years pharmaceutical companies have agreed to pay over $13 billion to resolve U.S. Department of Justice allegations of fraudulent marketing practices, including the promotion of medicines for uses that were not approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Here are summaries of some recent large settlements.”

“By using close-hold embargoes and other methods, the FDA, like other sources of scientific information, are gaining control of journalists who are supposed to keep an eye on those institutions. The watchdogs are being turned into lapdogs. “Journalists have ceded the power to the scientific establishment,” says Vincent Kiernan, a science journalist and dean at George Mason University. “I think it’s interesting and somewhat inexplicable, knowing journalists in general as being people who don’t like ceding power.”

CDC admits that adventitious agents have been found in vaccines. Adventious agents are defined by the World Health Organization as microorganisms that may have been unintentionally introduced into the manufacturing process of a biological medicinal product. They can include viruses, bacteria, mycoplasma, fungi, rickettsia, protozoa, parasites, and TSE (Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies) agents.

“In the past, biologic products have served as vectors for viral diseases. Examples include the contamination of yellow fever vaccine with hepatitis B virus in the 1940s (because a human-derived excipient contained hepatitis B virus), contamination of early polio and adenovirus vaccines with simian virus 40 in the late 1950s and early 1960s, contamination of blood products with hepatitis viruses and HIV, and contamination of dura mater grafts with the Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease agent. In these examples, either human or animal materials used in production usually caused the contamination.”

Dr. William Thompson is a senior research science at the CDC. In 2014, he came forward as a “whistleblower” – explaining how he co-authored a landmark, fraudulent study in 2004 that concealed a statistically significant correlation between the MMR and autism. In this study, the authors engaged in three, key, unethical, illegal actions: 1) deviated from the initial analysis plan; 2) omitted statistically significant data; and, 3) destroyed significant data. Deviating from an initial analysis plan is unscientific because it implies that the authors changed their study structure after realizing the data were unfavorable for vaccine safety.

Why the Corruption of the World Health Organization (WHO) is the Biggest Threat to the World’s Public Health of Our Time:

“Today after the Swine Flu Scandal it seems that the pharmaceutical industry has gained control over the WHO system, leading to an extreme bias towards the use of not only ineffective and unnecessary influenza vaccines and medicines, but also to the use of antipsychotics, antidepressant, antianxiety and other psychopharmacological drugs, cytotoxic anti-cancer chemotherapy, and a number of other drugs, which according to independent meta analyses and Cochrane reviews are found to be without significant beneficial effect – and often harmful.

We recommend a fundamental revision of the WHO-system that has proven itself weak to the interests of the pharmaceutical industry.

“The pharmaceutical industry has corrupted the practice of medicine through its influence over what drugs are developed, how they are tested, and how medical knowledge is created. Since 1906, heavy commercial influence has compromised Congressional legislation to protect the public from unsafe drugs. The authorization of user fees in 1992 has turned drug companies into the FDA’s prime clients, deepening the regulatory and cultural capture of the agency. Industry has demanded shorter average review times and, with less time to thoroughly review evidence, increased hospitalizations and deaths have resulted. Meeting the needs of the drug companies has taken priority over meeting the needs of patients. Unless this corruption of regulatory intent is reversed, the situation will continue to deteriorate.”

The CDC receives millions of dollars in gifts and funding from the pharmaceutical industry, which severely compromise its objectivity:

“Despite the agency’s disclaimer, the CDC does receive millions of dollars in industry gifts and funding, both directly and indirectly, and several recent CDC actions and recommendations have raised questions about the science it cites, the clinical guidelines it promotes, and the money it is taking.”

Pediatricians are financially incentivized to encourage vaccines as shown in Appendix D.

Quote from article: “The information taught by medical schools pertaining to vaccines cannot be trusted for the following reason, presented by Marcia Angell, senior lecturer in Social Medicine at Harvard Medical School, former Editor of the New England Journal of Medicine and author of The Truth About the Drug Companies: “If drug companies and medical educators were really providing education, doctors and academic institutions would pay them for their services. When you take piano lessons, you pay the teacher, not the other way around. But in this case, industry pays the academic institutions and faculty, and even the doctors who take the courses. The companies are simply buying access to medical school faculty and to doctors in training and practice.”[1]

Is Drug-Company Money Tainting Medical Education?

“But medical schools are a new low. After the Times stories were published, Senator Charles Grassley, an Iowa Republican and longtime critic of drug-company influence, fired off a letter to Pfizer chairman and CEO Jeffrey Kindler describing himself as “greatly disturbed” by the reports and accusing Pfizer of trying to “intimidate young scholars.” Grassley cited the 149 Harvard professors or instructors who have received payments or benefits from Pfizer specifically and demanded a detailed accounting of all of them.”

Pharma influence widespread at medical schools: study

“Recent research has revealed widespread pharmaceutical influence and weak institutional safeguards in Canadian medical schools. But lecturers, medical students and ethicists are far from united on the extent to which relations with industry are acceptable and what role universities should play in preparing students to withstand influence.”

CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that less than half of US family medicine programs have a curriculum addressing physician-industry interactions. Further research on the efficacy of and barriers to curriculum creation and implementation is warranted.

A systematic review of curricula on relationships between residents and the pharmaceutical industry.

CONCLUSIONS:

A limited number of curricula have addressed resident-pharmaceutical industry interactions.

The US has a history of experimenting with humans. Given the below, it shouldn’t be a surprise to learn that our own governmental agencies are reckless with our health, and do not properly test vaccines for safety or effectiveness.

1931 – Humans infected with cancer cells as well as radiation exposure experiments on US soldiers and civilian patients in hospitals.

1932 – Tuskegee Syphilis Study on 200 black men diagnosed with syphilis and used as guinea pigs.

1935 – Pellagra incident where millions of blacks died from Pellagra over 2 decades though US public health service director admits they knew that Pallegra was caused by niacin deficiency.

1986 – National Academy of Sciences reveal HIV and VISNA share all structural elements and that VISNA and HTLV are identical and likely to have been used to produce retrovirus that have no natural immunity.

1986 – Report to Congress reveals that biological agents (modified viruses, toxins, agents etc) have been altered through genetic engineering to change immunological character and prevent treatment by all existing vaccines.

1987 – US Dept of Defense admits to operating 127 research facilities and universities developing biological agents though it has signed a treating banning such research.

1990– Over 1500 black and Hispanic babies (6month) in Los Angeles given “experimental” measles vaccine (not licensed) in the US and parents are not informed of the experiment.

1994 – Senator John. D. Rockefeller issues report that for over 50years the Dept of Defense has used thousands of military personnel as human experiments/intentional exposure to dangerous substances (mustard and nerve gas, ionizing radiation, psychochemicals, hallucinogens…) during the Gulf War.

1997 – 88members of US Congress demand investigation into bio-weapons use and Gulf War Syndrome.

DISCLAIMER: THIS WEBSITE DOES NOT PROVIDE MEDICAL OR VETERINARY ADVICE The information, including but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material contained on this website are for informational purposes only. The purpose of this website is to promote broad consumer understanding and knowledge of the vaccine issue. It is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health care provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition or treatment and before undertaking a new health care regimen, and never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this website. (c) 2018 Hope from Holly. No part of this site may be copied without our express written consent.