Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)

Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.

Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.

To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.

To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.

To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).

Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Begone! (to clean the slate of the 4's) Aleister Joey No-Thumbs Day in the Falklands.

Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Wacky Wiki War! I deleted the dumb lists of memes, but that doesn't leave much. Intro tries to morph Wikipedia into a movie in the right way: by misusing actual Wikipedia catch-phrases. Unfortunately, it doesn't use them in a way that has any special meaning. That would be clever. It seems there are two sequels? Together, would they make one good article? SpıkeѦ11:44 20-Oct-13

They would, if they existed. But the author just put links to non-existent articles on Wikipedia itself. Anton(talk)Uncyclopedia United 13:33, October 20, 2013 (UTC)

There is one good joke here, which occurs without provocation to every twelve-year-old Uncyclopedian: A superfast superhero must not be much of a lady-pleaser. The author recurs to this, when not reveling in swears like "Jew," and cannot keep from patting himself on the back. There is a funny article in here waiting to get out. SpıkeѦ11:37 5-Nov-13

Delete. Encouraging the reader to browse with Special:Random and by following links is useful. But this listy page is thoroughly ugly; and Uncyclopedians patting themselves on the back is the ultimate trite joke. SpıkeѦ11:39 5-Nov-13

Delete. A WJU article that isn't linked to by any other WJU article. An in-joke that even other in-jokes refuse to acknowledge. • Puppy's talk page • 07:03 05 Nov 2013

Delete. WJU was a giant group vanity project. We voted to delete all the pages on specific individuals. Yesterday, I returned to the project, got rid of some red-links, and deleted vanity category Category:Pages not created by UtarEmpire (that being the name of an Uncyclopedian). Am eager to pare this back to something that a new generation of students could actually laugh at. SpıkeѦ11:32 5-Nov-13

Delete. Ignoring list-cruft, fake game, memes, in-jokes, terrible prose, spelling, grammar, and 'chopping, this keeps referring to “Josh”, “Rebecca” and some other name that just makes the whole thing feel like a Ballarat teenagers masturbatory fantasy. Survived deletion before, but possibly due to a disagreement about the 20 nominations rule. Should not survive again. • Puppy's talk page • 07:20 05 Nov 2013

Delete. Recipe for failure: Don't just write about a TV show. Don't just write about a single episode. Write about a fantasy video game you would have created to be enjoyed by viewers of that single episode. And write poorly (as listed by Puppy above). SpıkeѦ11:44 5-Nov-13

Delete. Author here. Man it's been ages since I've been on this site! Go nuts guys, this article was basically made yeeeears ago when me and my friend huffed one too many kittens and thought random 'chopping of a retarded photo of my cousin along with silly writing was funny. Was funny while it lasted I guess but the article doesn't belong here. --EvilCecil4th (talk) 14:01, November 10, 2013 (UTC)

Delete. I went through and removed the randumbo and listcruft from this article, and was left with one and a half poorly phrased paragraphs. So added it here instead. • Puppy's talk page • 09:14 05 Nov 2013

Delete. There is a story to be told, but this article doesn't begin. The section on "Victims" is a list of random memes. Certainly "(AKA Bilbo Baggins)" in the Intro signals to Anon that this is a page he is worthy of, and it is not just that it is about a slasher that makes the page a cruft magnet. SpıkeѦ11:48 5-Nov-13

Delete. This 2005 creation is a tedious read. It has a lot of randomness but I didn't find any humor. By the way, the 2000 US election (Bush vs. Gore) is over. SpıkeѦ13:46 6-Nov-13

Delete. From what I can google, this is neither original or a parody. It was loaded up in one hit, and is almost identical to a dozen or so other web pages I could locate. • Puppy's talk page • 10:49 06 Nov 2013

Lizards! This one needs more humor and pics, but lays a good foundation for Icke's insane theory (keep telling myself that keep telling myself that). With some tweaks and interesting twists the page could work well. Aleister 14:37 6-11-'13

Delete. It might not look so bad but ,I can assure you, once you've read it, you'll realize that, other than mentioning his buddy, Pedro once, it has nothing to do with Napoleon Dynamite and needs to be deleted and rewritten. Deletion wouldn't probably be needed if it did have some stuff related to the homonymous character but it doesn't. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 18:19, November 6, 2013 (UTC)

Weak. Never found the movie funny, so I may miss the humour here. • Puppy's talk page • 12:12 11 Nov 2013

Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Once I did the considerable research to figure out that Napoleon Dynamite is a character portrayed by Jon Heder, and most of the photographs are of Heder and are not cyberbullying of some other pimply teenager, the fact that the humor doesn't relate as well as it could to the real world was a minor concern. SpıkeѦ19:31 6-Nov-13