4. Use a specific example to demonstrate how knowledge of a pathogenic (i.e. disease-causing) Protist's life cycle can be used to control its spread. (3 marks) | | |Malaria: Developing antimalarial drugs to disrupt the life cycle of the malaria parasite. Controlling the metabolic or reproductive will | |control the...

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

...Zizek on Ideology and the Relationship
Between Ideology and “The Real”
`
CMNS 410
Professor Rick Gruneau
December 13, 2011
Zizek on Ideology and the Relationship Between Ideology and “The Real”
Slavoj Zizek is one of the leading theorists on ideology since the 1990’s and his conceptions of the real versus the symbolic versus the imagined are of particular importance when dissecting the question ‘what is ideology?’ Zizek’s critique of ideology and attempt to unpack it’s inner workings is fascinating, he is a powerful intellectual who aims to expose the ”fake” workings of society. In this paper I will outline Zizek’s definition and approach to the study of ideology, paying particular attention to the relationships he draws between ideology and “the real,” as opposed to “the imagined” and “the symbolic”.
Zizek opens the book Mapping Ideology (1994) with the introduction “The Spectre of Ideology”, where he defines and openly criticizes the idea of ideology and its illusory personality. First he presents us with the idea that ideology is a sort of matrix, “a generative matrix that regulates the relationship between visible and non-visible, imaginable and non-imaginable, as well as changes in that relationship” (italics mine, p.1). He further explains not everything that seems to be ideological, necessarily is, claiming that unless there is a link to power relations in the social realm he does not...

...“The Real Story in Life of Pi The difference between fiction and reality is not always evident to those who are unable or unwilling to recognize the difference.”
In Yann Martel’s novel Life of Pi, he wants the reader to decipher whether his first story or his second story is real. The first story consists of the protagonist, Piscine Patel, being trapped on a lifeboat with a Bengal tiger, Richard Parker, and many other animals from his father’s zoo after they were lost together at sea. In the second story, Piscine re-tells a different story with a chef, his mother, and a sailor, this was to give the Japanese investigators “a story that wont surprise them (you)” (Martel 302). Martel clearly wishes the reader to understand why “Pi” might have been more truthful in the one story rather than the other. He does this through different hints scattered throughout the novel. Martel never truly admits which story is true, but various occurrences throughout the novel make the actual story obvious depending on the readers perception.
Martel adds verisimilitude to the second story by having the Japanese investigators come to conclude “Mr.Patel, we don’t believe your story” (Martel 292) The Japanese investigators refused to believe that there is such island that he could have encountered on his journey, claiming there was no proof of a tiger living with Pi in the lifeboat, and by admitting that Pi had to look at his life in a new light to survive by...

...WHO makes small talk?
People with many different relationships use small talk. The most common type of people to use small talk are those who do not know each other at all. Though we often teach children not to talk to strangers, adults are expected to say at least a few words in certain situations (see where). It is also common for people who are only acquaintances, often called a "friend of a friend", to use small talk. Other people who have short casual conversations are office employees who may not be good friends but work in the same department. Customer service representatives, waitresses, hairdressers and receptionists often make small talk with customers. If you happen to be outside when the mailman comes to your door you might make small talk with him too.
WHAT do people make small talk about?
There are certain "safe" topics that people usually make small talk about. The weather is probably the number one thing that people who do not know each other well discuss. Sometimes even friends and family members discuss the weather when they meet or start a conversation. Another topic that is generally safe is current events. As long as you are not discussing a controversial issue, such as a recent law concerning equal rights, it is usually safe to discuss the news. Sports news is a very common topic, especially if a local team or player is...

...why would i still be talking to you? I don't have to talk to you but I actually choose to. You're just criticizing me now saying I'm unappreciative. This is why I don't want a stupid ass boyfriend. Wtf you're pissing me off. Seriously if i didn't appreciate you being my friend why would i still be talking to you? I don't have to talk to you but I actually choose to. You're just criticizing me now saying I'm unappreciative. This is why I don't want a stupid ass boyfriend. Wtf you're pissing me off. Seriously if i didn't appreciate you being my friend why would i still be talking to you? I don't have to talk to you but I actually choose to. You're just criticizing me now saying I'm unappreciative. This is why I don't want a stupid ass boyfriend. Wtf you're pissing me off. Seriously if i didn't appreciate you being my friend why would i still be talking to you? I don't have to talk to you but I actually choose to. You're just criticizing me now saying I'm unappreciative. This is why I don't want a stupid ass boyfriend. Wtf you're pissing me off. Seriously if i didn't appreciate you being my friend why would i still be talking to you? I don't have to talk to you but I actually choose to. You're just criticizing me now saying I'm unappreciative. This is why I don't want a stupid ass boyfriend. Wtf you're pissing me off. Seriously if i didn't appreciate you being my friend why would i still be talking to you?...

...Giving Justice to the Original:
Smooth Talk and Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?
Ideas for the story lines of many motion pictures get their inspiration from other works of writing often. Books are usually a main source of inspiration for movies, for instance, the movie Smooth Talk was based off of Joyce Carol Oates’ short story Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?. Most of the time however, you hear that the movie did not give justice to the book. Smooth Talk is an exception to this common conception. By keeping the main thematic issues of teenage ignorance and arrogance, and same symbiotic relevance throughout the movie gives the movie the same impact as the book, even though it has additional occurrences.
Keeping the same theme gives the same message to both movie and book. Themes of stories give the overall experience to the works. By clearly addressing the fact that teenagers are unaware of the actions that they are clearly too premature to be involved in for Smooth Talk and also in Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been. In the book it shows how when a teenager girl, like Connie, gets involved in thing adolescences shouldn’t be engaged in, it can lead her to a place where she has no control over the outcome of her life. She could have been killed, raped, ended up with a disease or pregnant, the book leads you to your own interpretation. Although the movie does clear up the...

...﻿Riwen Zhang
Professor Robinson Thomas
Class 0711
September 23, 2013
Who Talk Too Much
The essay “Women Talk Too Much” by Janet Holmes begins by showing many proverbs that point out that women are too talkative. She is trying to prove her points through the use of her research from talk show, seminars, and many other areas. Holmes does all she can to demonstrate that women in fact talk less than men. From most of her investigations, we can know that women do not talk too much, and it is men more than women who tend to insist other hear their opinions.
But why would people actually care whether women are talking too much or not? This is hard for me to understand. Take as an example, when four girls hang out to have tea and speak more per hour than four boys being together might, why would the boys care since it has no impact on them? What matters most is not how much men and women talk, but such things as (a) what do they talk about, (b) how much men and women do talk when they are in mixed gender groups and who seems to focus more on making a better environment for everyone present, (c) what does talk mean to women.
The classroom research Holmes mentions in the article is not comprehensive. “Talking in class is often perceived as ‘showing off,’ especially if it is girl-talk. Until recently, girls...

...﻿Analysis of “Women Talk Too Much”
In “Women Talk Too Much” Janet Holmes debunks the stereotype of the garrulous woman, which reflects sexist prejudice rather that objective reality (301). Holmes dispels the “language myth” that women talk too much. Holmes provides proverbs from different centuries, cultures, and countries to show that the perception that women talk more is a universal stereotype. Holmes provides research studies and facts to prove the amount of a talk depends. From this article we learn that the context of communication and situation is a first reason of gender language use. Second, the social confidence and topic familiarity are other reasons why women speak less than men. The last main point is that women tend to be silent because men think they talk too much when they just talk. The author asserts that the claim that women talk too much is inherently biased. Although people think women talk more than men, Janet Holmes asserts that it is a myth and, to support her claims, she provides relevant evidence in a logical manner. Her answer to “Do women talk more than men?” cannot be answered easily; the answer is “ it depends.”
Holmes claims that the idea women talk more than men is a universal stereotype. To debunk this stereotype her opposing argument is that men tend to talk more than...

...﻿
Claudina Mahon
JOURNAL EIGHT
"Is talk cheap"
People can talk about what they plan to do and what they are capable of doing, but unless further action is taken, such talk is just a fruitless pursuit. On the other hand, it is important that one should not confuse motion with action. A person can consume themselves with work that could always have them moving on their feet, but if there is no initiative done beyond a regular routine of work, all efforts are wasted. They may not only speak about brilliant ideas, but also create brilliant strategies to put ideas into action. Such people also prepare themselves for the inevitable rejection from those who are too afraid to move, too afraid to act. As an individual who belongs in category of people that move, I believe I am one who not only speaks with an iron fist, but an independent person who is not afraid to move along with life’s challenges.
Growing up in this world, I have come across the common ambitious person who plans on becoming a doctor, lawyer, or even a basketball player. However, I have also come across people who would describe these dreams as "unrealistic" or "ridiculous". Such people are the simple-minded immovable individuals that are unfamiliar with how strong the rush of ambition can become once a certain dream is put in set. These people essentially become the fuel for my movement because their doubts continue to motivate me to move even stronger and with more...