Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Please Look Again at The Port Arthur Massacre

The story goes… 28th April 1996. Martin Bryant* went into a café with a couple of semi automatic rifles, and open fired on the patrons, killing over 20 people and then moving around the Port Arthur Historic Penal Colony Tourist Site - killing another ten or more, then moved to another site where he was holding hostages and murdered two more before police smoked him out of the burning house the next morning with 3rd degree burns.

*or someone with blonde wig and driving his car with his passport on the dashboard

What doesn’t add up and what multiplies complicity??

1-Tasmanian Government purchases a 16 - 22 body hearse in the year leading up to the ‘event’

2- three strange predictions were publicised in the media. The first -

‘There is reason to think the Port Arthur massacre was planned as early as1987 when, after a specially called Premier's meeting in Hobart in December 1987, the New South Wales Labour Premier, Mr. Barry Unsworth stated, "there would be no effective gun control in Australia until there was a massacre in Tasmania".’

Plus - TWO warnings from Roland Browne head of NCGC gun control lobby in the 12 months leading up, about a massacre in Tasmania?

In Nov 1995 Browne warned there would be a massacre in Tasmania of massive proportions.

In March 96, after the Dunblane massacre he said the same again on A Current affair with Ray Martin.

Predictive programming?

3-local police were called off an hour in the opposite direction at the time of the massacre to a heroin stash which turned out to be jars of laundry powder

4- Bryant has no memory of being at Port Arthur that day of the massacre, yet was coerced to plead guilty.

5-“satanically accurate” shooting performance equal to the best military trained known killers said Brigadier Ted Sarong

6-ratio of kill to wound shots astounds professional shooters

7-there is no DNA evidence at all from Bryant found at the Broad Arrow Café

8-no blood spatters or DNA evidence taken from Bryants’ clothes, or his vehicle

9-not one witness positively identified Bryant on the day, only TWO WITNESSES identified him one month later on a photo board after his face had been all over the media.

10- Bryant was named as the lone gun-nut shooter and his ‘personality defects’ discussed on Good Morning America, within 24 hours of the event

see here …

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6y9OtUBrAGY&feature=related

Note how even Bryant Gumbel, the US morning news anchor notes the way the Aus media are speaking about the killer as if he has already had a trial the day after the massacre... to an international audience, on a show that also airs on an Australian network.

11-Bryant refused to plead guilty for nearly 6 months, until they changed his lawyer and after 14 or more visits, his new, improved lawyer John Avery got him to plead guilty, with the help of his pressured mother

12-John Avery is now in jail on unrelated charges

13--Political wrangling before the event from 1995 onwards-

*Police Officer closest to Port Arthur, Constable Chris Iles was moved to another station after 15 years, replaced by Constable Paul Hyland.

*Ian Kingston manager of the areas state emergency service since 1984 took a part time job as security manager and parking attendant at Port Arthur site.

*In March 96 a month before the ‘EVENT’, Tasmanian Premier Ray Groom ‘stepped down’ from the premier role to take on a number of different portfolios which all had to do with the P.A.M., including Attorney-General and Minister of Port Arthur.

*The Special Operations Group got a new leader, Hank Timmermann ten days before the massacre. Were these moves to put people ‘on the team’ into position?

14-Martin Bryant’s IQ was so low (66-70) that it was considered he always needed a legal guardian, one was not there when he agreed to the guilty plea

15- less than 6 months before the massacre P.T.S.D. (ompensation act in Tasm

16-Coincidentally, there was a Trauma surgeon conference in Hobart that macabre weekend

17-Coincidentally, there was a World Media conference in Hobart that sensational weekend

18- Many Port Arthur Mgt Staff were called away to an ‘Off Site’ workshop, in another town, at the exact time of the massacre

19-same Media Liason Officers for this ‘EVENT’ as the ’78 Sydney Hilton Bombing

20-police chief Jonson goes AWOL after the shooting never to be heard from again

21-Joe Vialls, (Conspiracy researcher/disinfo artist/ spook?) Hans Overbeeke, Justin Noble (BCI) present in film footage on the day of the ‘event’.???

22-police lit seascape lodge on fire with a flare? Then insinuated it was Bryant… ?

24-Martins “treatment” by Tavistock Institute trained psychiatrists since at least 1984 – that’s 12 years to prepare him, specialising in deep sleep, drug and coma therapy, including electroshock therapy, whilst unconscious, mind control Manchurian candidate techniques could have been employed here by these ‘specialists’

25- Both the murder weapons were damaged before they were recovered at seascape, and thus were never forensically linked to the murders.

26- In Australia a coronial inquest is usually held for any death not accompanied by a doctor's certificate. Coroner Ian Matterson determined that no inquest would be held into any of the 35 deaths following the guilty plea from Bryant. Despite repeated requests from some victims (see Coroners’ letter to Stephen Howard in relation to his wifes murder in the film, ‘A QUESTION OF GUILT)

27- Why did Bryant's lawyer - John Avery - convince his client to plead guilty when he knew Bryant had no memory of the crimes, and while Bryant had maintained his innocence for months?

28- Who is "Rick"? And why does Bryant mention him several times while talking to the police negotiator? Bryant (as “Jamie” )seems to know Ricks’ wife, he knows where Rick resides

29-Andrew MacGregor, retired policemen gives a quite funny account of what all the coppers, the military, and the SOG’s (special Op.s Group ) were doing for 5 hours while 500 locals and tourists were terrorised beyond living hell at the unsecured murder sites.

-

Port Arthur massacre Police training video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=530fWwdibvc&feature=related

WARNING: THIS VIDEO CONTAINS THE POLICE VIDEO FOOTAGE OF MORE THAN 20 DECEASED VICTIMS, (men women and children) OF THE PORT ARTHUR MASSACRE IN THE BROAD ARROW CAFE.

IT IS SHOCKINGLY GRAPHIC.

PLEASE TURN IT OFF IF IT CAUSES DISTRESS.

THIS VIDEO IS IMPORTANT EVIDENCE TO BRING FORTH AN ENQUIRY SO WE CAN STOP SWEEPING THIS EVENT UNDER THIS CARPET OF LIES.

PLEASE DO NOT WATCH IT IF YOU ARE TOO CLOSE TO THE EVENT OR IF DEATH DISTURBS YOU. IT WILL UPSET YOU, AND IF IT DOES, PLEASE DO NOT COMPLAIN TO ME. COMPLAIN TO YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILIES ABOUT FALSE FLAG PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS AND WITHDRAW YOUR COMPLIANCE WITH THE GOVERNMENTS.

We no longer need to hide, ‘they’, those involved and responsible, are the ones that should go into hiding.

Alternatively write to your local member but KNOW they can’t change anything and still hope to get ahead in politics.

This video turned up in a 2nd hand shop in 2004, and it is profound in giving the picture of the crime.

Despite the torturous lives the living victims must have suffered since then, we must resolve to bring the light to the evidence so these false flag events are stopped.

Phew.

Then all we’ll have left to deal with is ‘real’ terrorists.

================================================

A QUESTION OF GUILT : PORT ARTHUR MASSACRE

This is the full lentgth version of the movie at the top of the blog on vimeo

http://vimeo.com/6441985

==================================================

The ‘Port Arthur Massacre’, 15 years on….

Fatalities

The following is a list of those killed in the Port Arthur massacre.

•Winifred Joyce Aplin, 58

•Walter John Bennett, 66

•Nicole Louise Burgess, 17

•Sou Leng Chung, 32

•Elva Rhonda Gaylard, 48

•Zoe Anne Hall, 28

•Elizabeth Jayne Howard, 26

•Mary Elizabeth Howard, 57

•Mervyn John Howard, 55

•Ronald Noel Jary, 71

•Tony Vadivelu Kistan, 51

. Leslie Dennis Lever, 53

•Sarah Kate Loughton, 15

•David Martin, 72

•Noelene Joyce Martin, 69

•Pauline Virjeana Masters, 49

•Alannah Louise Mikac, 6

•Madeline Grace Mikac, 3

•Nanette Patricia Mikac, 36

•Andrew Bruce Mills, 49

•Peter Brenton Nash, 32

•Gwenda Joan Neander, 67

•Moh Yee Willing Ng, 48

- Anthony Nightingale, 44

•Mary Rose Nixon, 60

•Glen Roy Pears, 35

•Russell James Pollard, 72

•Janette Kathleen Quin, 50

•Helene Maria Salzmann, 50

•Robert Graham Salzmann, 58

•Kate Elizabeth Scott, 21

•Kevin Vincent Sharp, 68

•Raymond John Sharp, 67

•Royce William Thompson, 59

-Jason Bernard Winter, 29

May they rest in peace…

It disrupts me greatly as a comedian/musician/massage therapist to follow this Port Arthur Massacre conspiracy coming to light, I do not want to be involved, as I am a peace loving person, and in the possibility that this massacre was perpetrated by anyone other than (or alongside) Martin Bryant, means than these murderers are still at large, as are their employers, their handlers, and in a science faction fantasy- their underlords… so why should I stick my head up???

To me, my life is precious and I am afraid of death, but not so afraid I won’t try to walk towards it with integrity. I know it is INTENSE fear, that keeps many of the living victim’s mouths’ shut and not PUBLICLY question the official version. They KNOW the callous cold killers that must be behind this event as they’ve seen and experienced their reign of terror first hand.

The media keeps telling us, as apparently many locals reply when asked… “it is in poor taste to talk about the massacre because it brings up horrific memories”.

I am truly sorry if my urge for the truth to come to light upsets anyone. I just want to stop the powers that did this to you, from doing it to us, again and again and again…

Some surviving victims, (Wendy Scurr and Stephen Howard come to mind) are choosing to live from LOVE and not fear, and have been waking people like myself up, very slowly over the 15 years since the massacre, by doing public and internet talks about their personal experience of the day and the aftermath.

Please note, I am not worried about the rest of us all being shot at a tourist park per se, as much as terrified by how the f-f-fascist apparatus can impose new restrictions and take away our human rights in the name of the terror of these events that THEY THEMSELVES HAVE CREATED.

I don’t want us all to stay fooled.

Wendy and Stephen seem not afraid. To them the truth is most important, and it is with them that I stand. Wendy publicly admits at times she considered suicide so hard was her trauma to live with. Perhaps that’s how far people get pushed. To the point where the LIE will kill them anyway so they’ve got no option but to seek the truth even if it means sticking their neck out.

If I was a living victim I’d probably just try and move on, and get back to voting for Australian Idol, talking about the weather and “enjoying life”…. Or what tattered remains of life I have after SOME PEOPLE (I want to pretend do not exist) took my everything away from me.

For me though, now, I know stuff about this event which precludes me from accepting the official story, and I can’t unlearn it. I can only suppress it. I successfully suppressed it for about 7 years but it keeps leaking out.

I want the anomalies of this tragic event to be explored by the great UNSPONSORED minds of our time. I don’t want a royal commission, or any other stacked enquiry like the Warren Commission or the 9/11 investigation that just adds more lies. I doubt police or judiciary currently employed can genuinely assist impartially. It is true. This conspiracy is covered up right to the top eschelon of our police, judiciary and government. We need people outside the scope of government interests.

As some funny guy called ‘Abstract’ said in a forum post one day..

“I am so glad we have the media, the government, the courts to look after us, to keep us safe from nutters like Bryant.”

I’d like some sort of public recorded forum controlled and directed by the victims willing to speak publicly about the anomalies in the official version of events. We must guard against disinformation artists which have been prevalent in keeping this case argued outside mainstream channels over inaccurate moot points.

There is almost no cohesive, coherent information on the internet about this event, it is often muddled by many people arguing over many unestablished and constantly changing “facts”.

(see wikipedia for all the “truth changing” in their entries about P.A.M., this is one of the most changed entries in all wikipedia)

although I have my reservations about some of his conclusions and theories too.
He does present a good reflection of the group think that has rendered this case closed, way before any answers have come to light.

his shorter article published in NEXUS mag in 2006 might be a better place to start

For instance, after the massacre, it was “widely known” that Martin had been “involved” in his Dads’ suicide (it was said Martins’ diving weight belt was found around his drowned Dads’ neck) and also that Martin may have killed his friend Helen by playing with the steering wheel whilst she was driving on the highway.

Lately these accusations have been left out of descriptions of Martin, probably because sufficient time has passed to allow his Mum or other defenders the strength to request unsubstantiated claims be stifled.

This is after years of defamation of his character by the media, and paid pundits like the writers of BORN OR BRED?

They were the stars of the Sydney Writers Festival for that sponsored drivel. I refuse to remember the names of the writers, but they were so obviously paid to present a Martin Bryant who could have committed this grossest act by any person in history, and they didn’t even have time to research the ANOMALIES of the case???

I wish someone would pay them to do an expose on Dr. Paul Mullen.

More on that scary monster in the recommended reading…

The “writers” of Born Or Bred found out that Martin ‘scratched and taunted’ other kids, as a kid, (who didn’t ?) but they didn’t even ask about ONE of the anomalies listed above in the hope of giving a balanced view?

No, they would not have been commissioned to write a balanced view. Phucking Psychopaths!

They are not journalists, or writers, they are just empty vampires taking money for defaming a PATSY, by writing something they probably knew deep down, was for the purpose of keeping hidden a very dangerous group, FROM ALL OF US.

They are probably scared too. Everyone is so scared of death they keep us hopping like jacks, we’re so brainwashed to believe we are the body, the ego, and not the eternal soul.

If you take a scientific approach to life after death, there are many ways to explore if and how consciousness lives on without this body.

I personally paid to see 20 psychic mediums over 20 years. 17 times I wasted my money. 3 times the mediums got astounding personal messages to me from dead relatives and friends.

About the same ratio of good haircuts from hairdressers over 20 years.

Psychic Mediums are just people too and we all have to practice our crafts for decades before we can usually guarantee proficiency, whether we be masseurs, neurosurgeons, guitarists, chefs, lawyers etc etc etc

Once I had proved (subjectively) to myself that I am the ENERGY that animates the MATTER, the source of the matter, I guess I lost my fear to pursue the truth wherever it lead.

However, I can still remember living in fear, and can recognise others, not being their true selves, for what usually seems like monetary gain, (external power – a bigger house, guaranteed job, social position, better car, better shoes etc) which is really the cheap USE of our LIFE, energy, brains, heart and soul, by another.

Sadly, usually without the best intentions.

In return we LOSE our true internal power and wonder why we keep looking to do whatever it takes for the next promotion, new car, etc.

The hardest thing for me to reconcile when people like these “writers” or “journalists”; who are just taking money to LIE to themselves and us, is that they think it means they will be safer or protected, or in with the “in” crowd, when really all they are doing is taking the bucks to turn their head the other way, AND ATTEMPT TO TURN OUR HEADS THE OTHER WAY - and not notice the way the ultimate AGENDA of those, behind ALL of these FALSE FLAG PSYOPS, IS FOR ALL of US, except the very few “elite” (as they call themselves).

And, the ‘agenda’ does not look good.

It’s been 15 years now that Martin has been in jail, medicated, comatosed, deep-sleep therapied, hypnotised, isolated, brutalised, ridiculed, pricked, prodded, probably hated and controlled into whatever state his dark psychiatrists decide. Do some research on Dr Mullen and his ilk* and you will realise Martin could be by now, beyond repair.

*see tavisock below

Collectively we have all failed our brother. What kind of prisoner is NEVER allowed any visitors? It is no way to solve this problem in society even if he did alone shoot 55 people. We need access to him, and he needs access to help, love, deprogramming and reconditioning even if he is considered a lost cause forever incarcerated..

What sort of a man calls himself a doctor of psychiatry and then talks about his patient like Mullen talks about Martin? He clearly has NO empathy, no respect, no compassion, no integrity as a healer and no desire for understanding of his own charge, position, or responsibility.

Maybe Mullens' job is to control Martin as the murderer, and cover his own and his assosciates nefarious “work”.

Either that or he is just a shockingly bad psychiatrist and unevolved human, certainly no expert in my eyes. Rather an elitist bigot, superiority complex psychopath.

Do the research on Dr. Paul Mullen and his involvement with Dr Rebecca Peters over years and you may see why I am concerned.

Dr. Rebecca Peters

‘There is a series of events from 1978 to Port Arthur that tie Dr Mullen and Dr Peters together (Dr. Mullen wrote the official report on Port Arthur and Bryant, and Dr. Peters was responsible for anti gun legislation in this country).’

I didn’t know what I was getting myself into when I went along to hear Wendy Scurr speak about the trauma she experienced as one of the first survivors to go into the broad arrow café after that initial slaughter -to witness people dying, dead, their brains falling from the roof and walls and tipping from their exploded skulls into their bowls of chips.

Wonderful Wendy Scurr

Wendy is one of the great women heroines in my eyes. To perform first aid duties and triage amongst dozens of dead and almost as many wounded with very little assistance, and many of them were her friends, acquaintances and employees.

She speaks about her devastation on the day when backup police and medical help didn’t arrive for at least 5 hours after the shooting, so she shouldered much burden, trying to help those whose loved ones were gone, going or just forced to wait together, the long wait at the scene to do all the reports after five terrifying hours of already waiting for help, when everyone probably just needed to collapse.

Wendy is the sort of woman who showed equal courtesy to all that day and stayed helping and supporting people until well into the night. She stoically stuck around and did what needed to be done to care for the living, and respectfully deal with the dying, and the dead, many with surviving and wounded loved ones watching on, for hours not knowing where the gunman was.

In 2001 Wendy came to Melbourne on a speaking tour around Australia and I was hosting a community radio show at the time so I was hoping to interview her as a guest on my talk show to help promote her talk as it is natural to want to assist someone after troubles so deep.

I was also perturbed by my salacious interest in the details of such a horror show, perplexed about the killer and his motives, and generally curious about this Australian - one of the worlds worst ever single murderous acts, by one man.

When I got to the meeting at the Victoria Hotel I was greeted by a hundred or so people milling around on the street outside the venue and a few signs near the entrance saying “MEETING CANCELLED – PLEASE DISPERSE” or that’s how I remember it. It may have said “TALK CANCELLED” or other things but it was so long ago now I can’t remember.

This was before any conspiracy had begun to potentialise in my mind so I at this stage thought Wendy must have been sick or something and didn’t realise it was instead a gross violation of human rights occurring in my free loving “democracy” called AUSTRALIA.

I was informed the venue was MADE to cancel the talk by shadowy peoples whose names I do not know but some people know….

So that cocked my ear up a bit. I spake to a few peoples standing around and came to a man named Andrew MacGregor, who told me he was a retired policeman who was researching the whole “event” and travelling with Wendy showing evidence omitted from the mainstream media and calling for an independent inquiry into the massacre.

Aussies being Aussies, when they learned the meeting had been cancelled by the venue holders they just organised another venue at some Doctors home in the suburbs. I however was due at work, so I couldn’t attend the next venue.

I asked Andrew for a quick take on the event and his contact details in case I thought it would make a good radio show. Andrew suggested a walk to his car in the underground carpark about 300m away so he could give me a copy of his book, a collection of fascinating dots which connected to make the ugliest picture I’ve ever uncovered in my life.

The first anomalies -from the local police being called off an hour in the other direction for a faux “drug bust” which turned out to be washing powder, (thus keeping any police from the crime scenes for hours).

Then observe the political wranglings which occurred in the few years leading up to the massacre, the changes in LAWS which meant persons could no longer sue for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in Tasmania, clever thinking -as everyone, thousands could have, would have been seeking damages for PTSD after this trauma.

Also political and police positions changed and three strange predictions were publicised in the media. The first -

‘There is reason to think the Port Arthur massacre was planned as early as1987 when, after a specially called Premier's meeting in Hobart in December 1987, the New South Wales Labour Premier, Mr. Barry Unsworth stated, "there would be no effective gun control in Australia until there was a massacre in Tasmania".’

This quote shows at least how long they may plan these special “events” ahead. Then, if you think once is a coincidence, how’s TWO warnings from Roland Brown head of NCGC gun control lobby in the 12 months leading up, about a massacre in Tasmania??

It’s a shame he couldn’t predict which Tavistock mind-controlled Tasmanian boy would be held responsible, and stop it.

Sounds like it’s the anti-terrorist militia that plan and sponsor ALL THE TERRORISM. How Orwellesq! Orwellian… Orwellesqian! I can hear my own Dad saying “Well Bugger me!.”

That’s never going to help in a crisis…

Some of the best shooters in the world came out and said ‘no one can kill with that accuracy, that many people. That ratio of kill to wounded’. Many other things related to gun law changes and international events occurring in the same time and spurring the same changes in other nations.

As Andrew Macgregor and I walked back to the meeting together, on this first day I met him and before I had read his book, I postulated why??? How???

So many people required to create and carry out this fictional event and keep it secret, how could it be done??? What about the hundreds of eye witnesses??

I was beyond incredulous. It was beyond my belief back then I remember. MacGregor told me about FALSE FLAG black PSY_Ops and I just couldn’t believe him but I resolved to go research “Hitlers’ Reichstag”,

“The Lusitania”

the 'Gulf of Tonkin´ incident

and “Operation Northwoods”.

He also suggested I read John Le Carre novels to get a picture of the spook world that organise and carry out these EVENTS.

This was before 9/11 and I had never heard of false flag events or black psy-ops, even though I have since learnt that they have been around for at least half a century, actually, update, Caesar ? did one in 47ad ? bc??

Lets face it , since the beginning of men. And flags.

As we walked Andrew spoke of the Tavistock group based in London, (initially created by top psychiatry minds of NAZI regime, smuggled out of Germany after WW2 on ‘Vatican’ fake passports – research ‘Project Paperclip’)

Tavistock Institute is a mass mind manipulaion agency which shapes the minds of nations, with the help of private corporate contractors like Behaviour Modifications Operations –BMO see below*. Really scary once you real-ise the level of organisation these people have...

Tavistock was founded by people like Nazi Joseph Mengalls who was repatriated to London after WW2 and employed to continue his wartime brain tortures and mind control experiments.

Strangely, the bus bomb in the 7/7 London Bombings, went off in Tavistock square! And look at the in-your-face advertising they´ve chosen for the bus..

Just a co-incidence...

These groups and their private corporate offshoots create traumatic events and while we as masses are suffering and tortured, they manipulate us more with Trauma Based Mind Control, take away our historically hard won civil rights, and bring in new legislations which advance our owners’ ‘agenda’ – an increasingly fascist state.

As I approached the stairwell to walk back down to the hotel lobby, still in the carpark, a large door shaped woman dressed all in black stepped right in my line of step and took a photo of me with Andrew walking a few steps behind, with a big long lens on the camera…

I made some remark, about how he was attracting the press, and he told me matter of factly

“no. that’s ASIO.

They’re just letting you know you’re on file. If it was the 70’s, they’d be profiling you, photographing you from behind some blinds on the third floor up from across the street. These days, its easier for them to just let you know from the start you’re being watched. They intimidate you…”

Well. ! I was flummoxed. I whinged “but I don’t even BELIEVE you so why do they need a file on me? I’m just investigating…..??”

Looking back, I was asleep.

Anyway, I could go on with all the facts I’ve found since I started, but maybe that is for each of us in our own time.

For about the next 3 months after this meeting I had (regularly, sometimes every second day), strange middle aged fuddy-duddy’s sitting outside my house in cars watching me like leering, gossipy neighbours. They never said anything but they eyeballed me. I don’t know who they were but I just drifted away from the information after a few months.

I was not interested in becoming paranoid.

The local radio station had advised me, without too much research, that it was a fruitless investigation, adding “if the government wont admit to proven attempted genocide on the indigenous people, I don’t think you’ll get them to take responsibility for this massacre any day soon…”

At the time I felt a bit crazy at my radio station boss but I wasn’t sure why. Now I can see that even these people wanted to avoid the real powers behind events like this.

Better to report on the Rawandan Genocide…

So, in honour of brave souls like Wendy Scurr and Stephen Howard, here I go again…..

Below are some excerpts from articles freely available, from sources I trust ‘more than others’ whilst recognising they may still contain factual errors, or may even be deliberate disinformation put out to dispel investigation of the event. I reckon youse should all have a chomp around.

I have no interest in exposing the killers, I hope for justice for Martin Bryant, and all the victims of these mind control abusers, and for us all to wake up to who shapes our world, and how, with these FALSE FLAG PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS ON ALL OF US, this world over.

I am bloody obviously not an expert but nor do I have any paid agenda. I remember MLK saying “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere…” and because we slept through this miscarriage of justice we wonder why we had 9/11, Bali and the 7/7 bombings (amongst others) since Port Arthur.

The material is the best collection I have read, sources I find more trustworthy than others over the 15 years. Ten years ago Andrew MascGregor told me, beware anything written by Joe Vialls who dominates the net searches, and is probably fact mixed with disinfo.

Joe Vialls is now apparently deceased from a heart attack a few years ago, but who knows with these (?) spooks…. Maybe he’s somewhere doing a boyband with Elvis and Hitler.

I always kept my mind open that perhaps MacGregor was doing disinfo- but over the years his demeanor has not changed, very few facts have changed or been proven wrong, and he has also always been polite and patient, and also remembered me, after not speaking for 8 years, and only having a few conversations and email exchanges all those years earlier.

MacGregor has a keen mind, my only frustration is his inside knowledge means he occasionally jumps to conclusions we may never be able to prove, rather than just stating the facts. With his police history and insight into their workings he is perfect for seeing and painting in a picture none of us would otherwise have seen. Very few others could have as efficiently and meticulously, researched and exposed the suppressed facts of this case.

As you research you will find that Joe Vialls was seemingly AT PORT ARTHUR on the day of the massacre caught in film footage standing on a balcony smoking a cigarette. I’m sure there are many other disinfo agents putting out distractions, but the MOST obviously, publicly PUT OUT people by this investigation ongoing are a few internet bullies, arguing anyone with questions should just “SHUT UP” in the style of Bill O’Reilly.

See comments section on youtube PORT ARTHUR CONSPIRACY videos and you’ll find them….. they stick out like sore PSYCHOPATHS and maybe were involved, or have family/friends involved, and they want the questions SILENCED!

14 comments:

Thank you for this. I am an American who used to be asleep, and i came upon your page while researching the Port Arthur false flag. It is eerily similar to many of the false flags my country's government has perpetrated. I hope you guys can get your gun rights back over there.

He did it. I can't believe this bullshit. No government would allow this many innocent deaths just to get firearm laws changed. You are a dickhead, and should be put in the same cell as fuck head bryant and made to live there with him for the rest of your sad life.

I wish you and your whole family had been victims of that faked event. I would love to be next to you at the moment your employers enact their greatest world screwing plan to take a photo of your shocked face when they turn around and screw you with the rest of us.

This is a weird response. Are you suggesting this event at port arthur was a hoax, like Sandy Hook and Boston, where no one really died? Peekay tried to sell me this idea a while back. I suppose you could think it was an early faked staged event, but I have heard from the victims loved ones who are calling for a coronial enquiry, I have spoken to Wendy Scurr, they didnt act like these pathetic crisis actors. Plus I have seen (it used to be up in this blog) the police film footage of the deceased victims inside the cafe. That was not moulage. What makes you think it was a faked shooting? Do you have some evidence to share? Sometimes false flag events have real victims.

A very interesting read. As society we always need to do the best we can to frame truth as it truly happened -- which irregularities show is very clearly not the case in this situation (& many others in our world).

Aside from the main narrative here, I love what you wrote about being the energy that animates the matter :) x

I think its quite easy to see really.. especially now we have had so much experience with the CRISIS ACTORS Scenarios in the USA. Australians were what you call, pretty green about a lot of things .. a lot more awake now in 2016 to the social engineering tactics of Gubbament. thanks for Blogging .. I love a good blog. One of your pics is a bit big for the page though so perhaps you might fix that part up. Cheers MEP

BTW.... that comment from the gutless ANONYMOUS above is a shill / troll ... dumb idiot who wants to make you feel bad.. Well Anonymous stop being anonymous because you havent got the guts to even put your id to you weak comment AHEM DICKHEAD!

About Me

I go by Elissa, of the Hawke family, eternal living spirit in human form. I take 100% responsibility for my intentional creation/s and I love, respect and honour all life as One.
This is my subjective collective common sense understanding, after enthusiastic study of the techniques, misinformation and legal language our “masters” have used in their attempts to control, confuse and harvest us.
I am a woman, not a person, citizen, national, resident, legal entity, terrorist or subject. I have no allegiance to any corporation, nation, country, or states in contract. Nor am I a member of any law, legal, political or religious society or group.

Artistry

Lovers~ I'm currently just wanting to dig and dig which entrails going into 'that quiet place' and you know, spewing forth my first novel. Entitled Kilometres of Lollies~ The spiritual development of a nymphomaniac manic depressed comedienne on ayahuasca. Due Out December 2o12... but isn't everything.. . .

disclaimer

I am a researcher, comedian, musician and writer who enjoys discussion and debate about our current calamities. I am always prepared to be proven wrong or accept mutual disagreement. My beliefs and knowledge are not concrete but constantly changing and shifting as we drain off all the lies we have been marinating in since birth. We are all equal but if it comes down to right and wrong, I am usually right.

ok.

PS: I only write the BLURTS... The other categories are collections from various alternative news sites.

"There's a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious—makes you so sick at heart—that you can't take part. You can't even passively take part. And you've got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you've got to make it stop. And you've got to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it, that unless you're free, the machine will be prevented from working at all."Mario Savio

The truth about the truth

All truth passes through 3 stages : first, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.(Schopenhauer)

Thousands of civilians granted power to issue fines A growing number of civilians are being granted police-style powers allowing them to iss...

sites I like

gumshoenews.com

centerforaninformedamerica

freemantv.com/

youtube.com/user/thejoycamp

repeatlessness.com

cindysheehanssoapbox/blogspot.com

soniapoulton.co.uk

sherrypeeljackson.org

whatonearthishappening.com

dollarvigilante.com

freemanitoba.com

justsaynow.firedoglake.com/

publicbanking.wordpress.com/

freedomforceinternational.com/

norml.org/

wearechange.org/

lawfulrebellion.org/

ageofautism.com/dr-andrew-wakefield/

novaccine.com/

makeherbalmedicines.com/

brucelipton.com

mayanmajix.com/

creditorsincommerce.com

thinkfree.ca

wyddty.com

kimnelson.com.au/index.html

kelvincruikshank.co.nz/public

thecrowhouse.com

mercola.com

naturalnews.com

talismanicidols.org

jordanmaxwell.com

trueworldhistory.info

redicecreations.com

cmn.tv

helpfreetheearth.com

tarpley.net

globalresearch.ca/

theintelhub.com

corbettreport.com

activistpost.com

sovereignindependent.ie

cuttingthroughthematrix.com

vigilantcitizen.com

spiritualeconomicsnow.org

getoutofdebtfree.org

There was an error in this gadget

Translate

Follow by Email

Followers

Disclaimer and Fair Use For Legal Boffins

Disclaimer and Fair Use Thanks Jeff Rense and Co.,
Disclaimer - The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
The myriad of facts, conjecture, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information in the articles, stories and commentaries posted on this site range from cutting edge hard news and comment to extreme and unusual perspectives.
I choose not to sweep uncomfortable material under the rug - where it can grow and fester. I choose not to censor skewed logic and uncomfortable rhetoric. These things reflect the world as it now is - for better and worse.
I present multiple facts, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information. As with all controversies, I stand ready to post any and all rebuttals and responses from people mentioned in the material I post.
Journalism is (or used to be) the profession of gathering and presenting a broad panorama of news about the events of our times and presenting it to readers for their own consideration. I believe in the intelligence, judgment and wisdom of the readers to discern for themselves among the data which appears on this site that which is valid and worthy...or otherwise.
The idea of a free press on Earth is one that I hold in the highest regard. I believe in bringing my website visitors and program listeners the widest possible array of information that comes to my attention. I have great trust and respect for the people, and my worldwide audience, and believe them to be fully-capable of making their own decisions and discerning their own realities.
Among the thousands of articles posted here for your consideration, there will doubtless be some that you find useless, and possibly offensive, but I believe you will be perceptive enough to realize that even the stories you disagree with have some value in terms of promoting your own further self-definition and insight. My site is a smorgasbord of material...take what you wish and click or scroll right past that which doesn't interest you.
I suggest you don't make 'assumptions' about my official position on issues that are discussed here. That is not what this site is about. I believe it to be unwise to sweep controversy under the carpet. I also firmly believe people should not only read material which they agree with. The opinions expressed through the thousands of stories here do not necessarily represent those of myself or my website.
I am not going to censor the news and information here. That is for you to do.
I strongly recommend not 'assuming' anything. Read, consider, and make your own informed decisions. People 'assumed' the world was once flat.
One more time...
Neither Elissa Hawke or elissahawke.com necessarily adhere to, or endorse, any or all of the links, stories, articles, editorials, or products offered by sponsors found on this site.
All of the materials and data offered on this site are for informational and educational purposes only.
And remember: it's all free to you, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Thank you for visiting.
Enjoy.
The materials comprising the elissahawke.com news service (the "Website") are provided by elissahawke.com as a service to its readers on an "as-is, as-available" basis for informational purposes only. elissahawke.com assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions in these materials. elissahawke.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. Further, elissahawke.com cannot edit, control, review for truth or accuracy, or screen for defamation or obscenity any content provided to the Website by a third party through postings, uploaded files, or any other form of communication, nor can the elissahawke.com ensure prompt removal of defamatory, obscene, inappropriate or unlawful content after transmission. Any such third party postings, files or other communications do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or positions of the elissahawke.com, its owner, employees or sponsors.
elissahawke.com makes no, and expressly disclaims any, representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the Website, including, without limitation, any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. elissahawke.com makes no, and expressly disclaims any, warranties, express or implied, regarding the correctness, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and reliability of the text, graphics, links to other sites and any other items accessed from or via this Website or the Internet, or that the services will be uninterrupted, error-free or free of viruses or other harmful components. Under no circumstances shall elissahawke.com, its owner, or any of her respective partners, officers, directors, employees, agents, associates or representatives be liable for any damages, whether direct, indirect, special or consequential damages for lost revenues, lost profits, or otherwise, arising from or in connection with this Website, the materials contained herein, or the Internet generally.
All materials contained in this Website are protected by copyright laws, and may not be reproduced, republished, distributed, transmitted, displayed, broadcast or otherwise exploited in any manner without the express prior written permission of elissahawke.com or the author, authors or sources of said materials.
You may download material from this Website for your personal and non-commercial use only, without altering or removing any trademark, copyright or other notice from such material. Any third party materials posted, filed or otherwise communicated to this Website become the copyrighted property of the elissahawke.com, and may be used, reproduced, published, distributed, transmitted, displayed, broadcast or otherwise exploited by elissahawke.com.