Baranowski, Tom
2006.
Advances in Basic Behavioral Research Will Make the Most Important Contributions to Effective Dietary Change Programs at this Time.
Journal of the American Dietetic Association,
Vol. 106,
Issue. 6,
p.
808.

Dietary assessment has been used for certification to receive food supplements or other nutrition services and to provide feedback for educational purposes. The proportion of individuals correctly certified as eligible is a function of the amount of error that exists in the dietary measures and the level of dietary intake used to establish eligibility. Whether individuals are correctly counselled to increase or decrease the consumption of selected foods or nutrients is a function of the same factors. It is not clear, however, what percentage of individuals would be correctly classified under what circumstances. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the extent to which measurement error and eligibility criteria affect the accuracy of classification.

Design:

Hypothetical distributions of dietary intake were generated with varying degrees of measurement error. Different eligibility criteria were applied and the expected classification rates were determined using numerical methods.

Setting and subjects:

Simulation study.

Results:

Cut points of dietary intake at decreasing levels below the 50th percentile of true intake were associated with lower sensitivity and predictive value positive rates, but higher specificity and predictive value negative rates. The correct classification rates were lower when two cut points of dietary intake were used. Using a single cut point that was higher than the targeted true consumption resulted in higher sensitivity but lower predictive value positive, and lower specificity but higher predictive value negative.

Conclusions:

Current methods of dietary assessment may not be reliable enough to attain acceptable levels of correct classification. Policy-makers and educators must consider how much misclassification error they are willing to accept and determine whether more intensive methods are necessary.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

By using this service, you agree that you will only keep articles for personal use, and will not openly distribute
them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services.
Please confirm that you accept the terms of use.

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please
select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise
Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account.
Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Misclassification associated with measurement error in the assessment of dietary intake

By using this service, you agree that you will only keep articles for personal use, and will not openly distribute
them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services.
Please confirm that you accept the terms of use.

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please
select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise
Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account.
Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Misclassification associated with measurement error in the assessment of dietary intake

By using this service, you agree that you will only keep articles for personal use, and will not openly distribute
them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services.
Please confirm that you accept the terms of use.

8NEDay, NMcKeown, MYWong, AWelch, SBingham. Epidemiological assessment of diet: a comparison of a 7-day diary with a food frequency questionnaire using urinary markers of nitrogen, potassium and sodium. International Journal of Epidemiology2001; 30: 309–17.

9VKipnis, RJCarroll, LSFreidman, LLi. Implications of a new dietary measurement error model for estimation of relative risk: application to four contribution studies. American Journal of Epidemiology1999; 150: 642–51.

15SDBaxter, WOThompson, HCDavis, MHJohnson. Impact of gender, ethnicity, meal component, and time interval between eating and reporting on accuracy of fourth-graders' self-reports of school lunch. Journal of the American Dietetic Association1997; 97: 1293–8.