With a name so close to 'syzygy,' I would think you would have a better appreciation for the "impossible" eclipse of selenelion. To discuss it as a trick of atmospheric optics is the same as saying it's magic. I have been down this road a few times with professional shills. Not so much here as g-l****p. They are smart cookies who throw around jargon and specious arguments that distract from the main point. None on this thread, for sure. You say there is no third object in an eclipse, then say they all need to be lined up for an eclipse. So which is it?

The correct term, by the way, is atmospheric refraction, bending of light due to water vapor in the air between the observer and the target, especially at sunrise and sunset. This is not the case, though, as both the sun and moon are too advanced in the sky to produce a shadow.

You spend an inordinate amount of time correcting my logic while presenting no (0) case for your heliocentric model.
Which says --
- earth spins 1000 mph, revolves around the sun at 66,600 mph, around a star moving half a million mph
- in a vacuum
- with an atmosphere that perfectly syncs speed with all the above motions
- so that we notice no movements; neither do clouds and smoke show any movement
- because a theory called gravity keeps the gaseous atmosphere from dispersing away into the vacuum of space
- and the aforementioned theoretical gravity keeps oceans in their banks on a spinning ball
- and this us accomplished because water seeks its own level if we redefine level as an equidistance from the center of earth, instead of sea level meaning flat along a horizontal line
- though we really don't know much about geology since the deepest hole ever drilled went down to only 7.5 miles
- and gyroscopes can't work on a constantly moving spinning ball
- and Chicago can be seen from 50 miles away across Lake Michigan, despite spherical trigonometry dictating a obscuring curve of 8 inches times miles squared -- 8 x (50 x 50) = 8 x 2500 = 1667 feet.

Enough for now. Flatearthers know more about the heliocentric model than globers.

Find any evidence to support current cosmology and I will debate it. Me go cook dinner now.

Actually I didn't start nor do I intend to argue current cosmology. The original statement about the moon being lit from the wrong side, and the idea that clouds can be behind the sun and the patently false photo image you posted are what caused me to reply.

I have no burning desire to prove nor disprove round vs flat. I doubt you've ever seen me reply in any other thread of the subject. To me, it's like the biblical 6K vs extreme age of the Earth. Fun to discuss..but it is not a burning subject that demands my immediate attention. It is not unheard of, perhaps, but how could such a conspiracy be kept under wraps for so long? Actually, never mind...I am not going to discuss the subject anymore.

Maybe someday I will find it a more important subject to delve. Heaven knows there are enough smokescreens out there to navigate.

It would seem that until the both of us can fly up in the sky to witness, firsthand, neither one will prove beyond a doubt to the other.

Published on Nov 18, 2016 -- second part, more footage, showing clearly without a doubt that we have a very close sun, also in second clip you see clouds behind the sun. This would ofc. mean and prove that we all have our own sun.
Share with sheeple, to wake the people. I am sick of deception, look at the sky, the truth is there :)
Please like \ subscribe, if you do not like the truth; move on :D.

Not much depth here, reminds me of a Biloxi beach. I walked out for what seemed like miles and never got my knees wet.
Let's see. Would that be high tide? Right?
What causes tides? A moon 235,000 miles away which only shows us one face. Because it's tidally locked, right? And though it is extremely large, it does not crash down on us. And it is possible for an ordinary camers to zoom in on a crater 50 miles wide.
Right? Cameras can focus at 235,00 miles? Right? Isn't 235,000 miles like a quarter million miles? What amazing optical instruments Nikon has!

I posted this before. Oldwhatshisname was the only poster who took the time to consider it.

By the way, Czygyny, I said exactly what you did right before I blundered into FE theory. Sorry to see you don't want to continue to seek the whole truth of our existence.

"I have no burning desire to prove nor disprove round vs flat. I doubt you've ever seen me reply in any other thread of the subject. To me, it's like the biblical 6K vs extreme age of the Earth. Fun to discuss..but it is not a burning subject that demands my immediate attention. It is not unheard of, perhaps, but how could such a conspiracy be kept under wraps for so long? Actually, never mind...I am not going to discuss the subject anymore."

No curiosity on LOP. A shame. Happy hamsters gonna defend their hamster cage. Some lunatics, ha!
Sheeple Outpost is a better name.

Lunaticoutpost.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program , an
affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to
earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.
Amazon, the Amazon logo, MYHABIT, and the MYHABIT logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Terms of Service :

Don't be a pest to the forum.

No profanity in thread-titles or usernames

No excessive profanity in posts

No Racism, Antisemitism + Hate

No calls for violence against anyone..

Disclaimer:
This website exists for fun and discussion only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality
or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events.
The content of posts on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites,
are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way
representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this
website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific
author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual
information on behalf of the owner or administration of
LunaticOutPost.Com. The owners or administration of this website can't
be hold responsible for content hosted on sites that posters link to
in; including, but not limited to, posts, signatures, private messages and such.
This site may contain content not suitable for minors and if you feel
you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.

Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use
of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance
awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights,
economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science
& technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any
such copyrighted material. The
material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for
research and educational purposes.

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users
limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant
portions of the article you wish to discuss (no more than 50% of the
source material) provide a link back to the original article and provide
your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and
you believe a post on this website falls outside the boundaries of "Fair
Use" and legitimately infringes on yours or your clients copyright please contact [email protected]

I will not rent, sell, share or otherwise disclose your personal information to any third party.
We might contact you from time to time
regarding your purchases or the services (like forums and announcement
lists) you have subscribed to.

Some of the 3rd party advertisers on lunaticoutpost.com may use cookies
to track peformance and/or to serve relevant ads.
If you wish to read more and/or opt out of such cookies, please visit: http://www.networkadvertising.org/choices/