1. Mr Vaz said their (Jones, MacKaill, Hinton) answers had been "most unsatisfactory" and he would be calling their media adviser ( the local Cops Union PR) , John Gaunt, to answer questions about his role in the affair.

I watched almost all of it on live TV and it was clear to everyone ( and yes, there were hoots of derision as the three oafs lied openly to Parliament) that Jones MacKaill, Hinton had set the whole thing up to discredit Mitchell as part of a battle against having to work smarter not something all cops are able to do.

1. Mr Vaz said their (Jones, MacKaill, Hinton) answers had been "most unsatisfactory" and he would be calling their media adviser ( the local Cops Union PR) , John Gaunt, to answer questions about his role in the affair.

Pot. Kettle. Black.

From his Wikipedia page:

In 2002, Vaz was suspended from the House of Commons for one month after a Committee on Standards and Privileges inquiry found that he had made false allegations against Eileen Eggington, a former policewoman. The committee concluded that "Mr Vaz recklessly made a damaging allegation against Miss Eggington to the Commissioner, which was not true, and which could have intimidated Miss Eggington or undermined her credibility".

From his Wikipedia page:
In 2002, Vaz was suspended from the House of Commons for one month after a Committee on Standards and Privileges inquiry found that he had made false allegations against Eileen Eggington, a former policewoman. The committee concluded that "Mr Vaz recklessly made a damaging allegation against Miss Eggington to the Commissioner, which was not true, and which could have intimidated Miss Eggington or undermined her credibility".

You don't have to be spotlessly clean in character to point out a liar.

Arguing with the forum trolls is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the bird will **** on the board and strut around like it won anyway