Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.

‘The aims of the criminal justice
system in England and Wales are always achieved’. Critically discuss this
positional statement with regard to one of the following – The police

The
Criminal Justice System is, “a complex social institution which regulates,
governs and controls social disorder and contemporaneously maintains the status
quo of a particular society.” (Hucklesby/Wahidin, 2013, p. 1) In order for the
criminal justice system to maintain this, ‘status quo’, each institution inside
has its own specific aims with their own goals to ensure safety and peace
amongst communities in England and Wales. For example, preventing and deterring
crime through the use of police officers walking around the streets. Additionally,
it aims to punish offenders, maintain justice in courts and ensure law and
social order. However, the reality of whether these aims are achieved
successfully is questionable and one to determine.

One
of the agencies in the criminal justice system are the police, whose aim is to
prevent and reduce crime by arresting people performing illegal activities. When
discussing the aims of the criminal justice system this essay will focus on the
police. In order to do this the following areas will be critically explored; the
history of the police, their aims and their role in society.

“The purpose of the police service is to uphold the
law fairly and firmly; to prevent crime; to pursue and bring to justice those
who break the law; to protect, help and reassure the community.” (T.Newburn, 2003, p. 87) Over the
years the aims of the police have become blurred with increasing roles being
added. Many cases involve multi-agencies with the police taking a leading role
whether this is appropriate or not. The number of criminal laws has greatly
increased with the number of crimes per officer also increasing. Therefore, it
is clear that the police are an agency within the criminal justice system that
have a significant duty when tackling crimes. To an extent is can be argued
that due to this increased role it makes it more challenging for the police to
always achieve their aims on such a broad scale. An example is, “the increasing
use of motor cars from the 1930s in particular generated challenges for the
police.” (Turner et al , 2017, p.188) This means
that criminals were much harder to apprehend as they were driving motor cars
whereas the police were used to being on horseback or on foot. Similarly in
today’s society the Borough Commander of Hackney Police, Chief
Superintendent Steve Dann, feeling somewhat uncertain said,

“My
belief is I think we need to fundamentally review what policing is about … it
is such a complex business now, so I think we need to take a bit of a time out
and say: “Okay, what are we here for?” (Affairs, 2008) This clearly
indicates that the police’s aims in modern day society are becoming confused
with what they originally were set up to do in 1829; this could be down to the
culture shift in advanced industrial society. For example, with technological
changes in society there are more corporate crimes committed on a day-to-day
basis which are completely internal; the police would not necessarily pick up
on these crimes as part of their regular duties.

With this
being said, Sir Robert Peel in 1829, came up with nine principles of law
enforcement which in policing today is developed and summarised in the ‘Peelian
Principles’. These principles are based on the fact that the police have the
power but only by the consent of the people. These principles are still valid
today and have shaped the approach of the HMIC, formerly known as, ‘Her
Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services’. As
Chief Constable Alex Marshall from the College of Policing stated,

“We
should be proud of our history and constantly strive to live out the Peelian
principles as they apply in the modern context.” (Marshall,
2004)

The fact that
the College of Policing follow these key aims emphasises that when people train
to become part of the police force principles, such as crime prevention and
co-operation with the public, are embedded in the heart of their programme.
This leads society to believe that with the right training their aims can be
achieved.

Alternatively,
this is not always the reality, an aim in particular that the police appear to
have abused, and have not previously achieved, is the excessive use of force
upon people in some cases. As one of the police’s general instructions they can
use, “minimum physical force if necessary after the exercise of persuasion,
advice and warning.” (Office, 2012) However, one case
where the police did not achieve this aim was with Harry Stanley in 1999.
Stanley was shot dead by the metropolitan police as they thought he was armed
when in reality he was found carrying a table leg. The Crown Prosecution
Service however accepted the police’s declaration that they were acting in
self-defence. However, the Guardian newspaper headline was, “Killing of man
with table leg unlawful” (Association, 2004). Thus, the media clearly
held the opinion that this act was wrongful although the police officers were
found not guilty by the court. A further case was that of Ian Tomlinson. In the
2009, “London summit protests”, Tomlinson was a bystander who was pushed to the
ground by a police officer which subsequently led to his death. The officer
from the Metropolitan Police’s Territorial Group was charged with manslaughter
but also found not guilty. Cases such as these show a clear indication of where
the police have abused their power and have not achieved their aims.

Ashworth
and Redmayne identify that, “police behaviour is influenced by a ‘cop culture’
that is widely spread through the organisation.” One of the elements that they
mention which creates this ‘cop culture’ is “the ‘macho image,’ this includes
heavy drinking and physical presence and may extend to sexist and racist
attitudes.” (Redmayne, 2010, p. 69) Here, the ‘physical
presence’ is clearly used in some cases to exercise the police’s power.

An
important case where the police did not achieve their aims but instead appeared
to abuse their power was in the ‘Hillsborough Disaster’. As the Telegraph stated,
“Hillsborough verdicts: Police to blame for disaster in which 96 Liverpool fans
were unlawfully killed.” (Watson, 2016, p. 1) The ‘Hillsborough Disaster’
was a fatal human crush during the FA Cup semi-final match between Liverpool
and Nottingham Forest in Sheffield at the Hillsborough Stadium, in 1989. There was
a substantial amount of over-crowding and a police officer ordered Exit Gate C
to be opened, this led to more supporters entering the central pens, which subsequently
led to the crush. However, it took 27 years for the police to finally admit and
accept the blame for causing the deaths of the ninety-six people who died in
the crush. Initially the police gave the media information accusing the
supporters of, “violent behaviour after drinking alcohol” (Conn, 2016), however the deaths
were not accidental and it has been established a, “major cover-up had taken
place in an effort by police and others to avoid the blame for what happened…
the police ‘caused or contributed’ to the disaster and that the victims has
been unlawfully killed.” (Watson, 2016, p. 1) The Hillsborough Disaster
is no doubt one of the greatest miscarriages of justice that was caused by the
police. With a case like this it becomes difficult to suggest that the police
have achieved any of their aims in preventing crime and protecting people.

In
contrast to this, a key aim of the police is to make arrests when they feel it is
necessary to do so and ‘stop and search’ anyone who they believe to be acting
suspiciously. In the year ending March 2018, “there were 698,737 arrests
carried out by the police in England and Wales… and in the year ending March
2008, there were almost 1.5 million arrests.” (Office, 2018, p. 6) This evidence indicates that the police
are making fewer arrests as time passes into more recent years, indicating a
potential decrease in crime of the individuals. Therefore, if the statistic for
arrests is decreasing, it could be argued that the police are achieving their
aim by preventing and therefore reducing crime.

Additionally,
a case where a police officer went above and beyond his duty is Wayne Marques
in the London Bridge attack of 2017. Here a terrorist vehicle drove straight into
pedestrians on London Bridge. Marques attempted to fight the attackers with a
baton and got stabbed in the process. This heroic move and bravery were
recognised across the country especially in the media. For example The BBC news
wrote headlines such as, “London Bridge attack officer fought to keep people
alive.” (News, 2017) Marques was left
temporarily blinded with stab wounds in his head, leg and hand, this sort of
courageousness saved many more people’s lives showing his heroism. Marques had
Royal recognition and was rewarded a ‘George Medal’ for his bravery. Acts like
this makes the criminal justice system credible as it demonstrates that their aims
are being achieved in the capacity of being a police officer but even further
by taking near fatal wounds in the act of saving other people. Thus, an example
where police officers such as Marques achieve their aims in keeping people
safe.

Conversely,
although the police in some instances save people’s lives and prevent crime
from happening by arresting individuals, this has not reduced the fear of
crime. For example, the Police Foundation state, “There is a significant
and sustained rise in the levels of crime for several decades…a rapid increase
in feelings of insecurity and fear of crime.” (Police Foundation / Policy
Studies Institute, 1996) A reason for this could be the use of the media, for
example Ian Marsh who states that television programmes only emphasise this,
“Crimewatch has been criticised for contributing the fear of crime through its
emphasis on and dramatic reconstructions of violent and sexual crime.” (Marsh et al, 2017) This evidence suggests that the
aim of attempting to reduce the fear of crime is not being achieved; in fact it
is being highlighted. Thus making the perception of crime becoming worse than
it actually is, mildly undermining what the police do in terms of their roles. However,
the media do tend to portray the police in a positive light, suggesting them
being ‘heroes’ as in the body of a text read by a news reader or printed in a
newspaper, this then could arguably distort the public’s view, as with the case
of Harry Stanley where police brutality was evident.

However,
there continues to be large numbers of police officers being investigated for the
assault of prisoners/suspects/public with very few of these being suspended. “The
Met in 2015 for instance has over 1200 Officers being investigated and only 5
were suspended and 28 put on restricted duties.” (Gallagher, 2015) This, through its
existence, shows that the aims of the police are being abused and not being achieved
at all. It could be suggested however, that police officers are an ‘easy
target’ and are more likely to be accused of assaults particularly if a
prisoner is guilty of a crime and trying to deflect some of this blame.

In 2016
there was an alleged assault by the Police on Julian Cole that left him
paralysed and brain-damaged. The Police were asked to suspend the officers
during the investigation, but they did not do so. This is an example of the
Police not matching the requirements of the justice system both during (allegedly)
and after the event. “The officers were found to have lied in both their pocket
notebooks and subsequent statements to investigators about Cole’s condition” (Gayle, 2018) The fact the police
not only changed Cole’s life forever leaving him severely paralysed and brain
damaged, they lied. This illustrates the horrific nature in some instances
where police definitely do not achieve their aims and certainly do not follow
their job role. In the end, three officers were sacked, however the fact they
were only ‘sacked’ and no further action was taken shows a huge flaw in the
criminal justice system because it is clear there has not been any justice for
Julian Cole.

In London
people who live there are about, “one third of the population but account for
over 55% of brutality claims”. (Robinson, 2017) In the West Midlands
the contingent is 14% of the population but half of the brutality cases. “Of
the 146 ongoing police assault investigations in the West Midlands where
ethnicity is recorded, 71 complainants are white (49 per cent) and 69 black or
Asian (47.5 per cent” (Gallagher, 2015) This is rather
significant as the statistics show that over half of the population living the
capital of England have been subject to police brutality. Alongside in the West
Midlands it appears to show that ethnic minorities are victimised by police
officers thus indicating the police by no means achieving their aims in the
criminal justice system.

There is
an argument that if quantitative targets were removed the Police could use more
discretion when dealing with an incident. However, this could result in a lack
of skills in making discretionary decisions placing pressure on individual
officers and mistakes being made. Greater leadership and supervision from
superior officers would be required and this could unnecessarily use the scarce
resources that are available.

In summary, the Criminal Justice System exists to uphold the
law and deliver justice where crimes have occurred. It would be too simplistic
to suggest that this would occur without challenge. Any system of significance,
such as the police force, will inevitably have its own glitches. One would
always strive to achieve the ends in delivering a flawless establishment but as
demonstrated it is clear to see that any system has challenges and each in turn
has to be dealt with on a case by case basis. However, it appears from the
research that the police do not achieve their aims in many cases and this is to
a rather significant extent. Examples of statistics and cases moslty indicate
police not performing their job role in the proper manner which leads to many
undeserved deaths and injuries. A prime example being the Hillsborough
disaster. In conclusion, although the police have a set of rules and procuders
to follow it does not seem they uphold them to their highest standard in many
cases. Excluding individuals obviously such as Wayne Marques, it needs to be
noted that as a whole police brutality should be taken more seriously and dealt
with sevrerely.