To think this is sexist?

So I should explain me and DH have two daughters in nappies - a 3 month old and a near two and a half year old (we have been trying to toilet train her but haven't been successful yet). DH is a brilliant and very 'hands-on' dad. A couple of days ago we were out at a family occasion for the afternoon, and invariably both girls needed nappy changes during the day. The venue only provided baby change facilities in the ladies loo. This has happened several times at various locations when we've been out with the DDs. DH offered to still do nappy changes but I said I'd do it as he understandably felt uncomfortable going into the ladies, and he didn't want to do it on the floor in the male loos as (in his words) the floor is always covered in piss and he doesn't want the girls lying on a piss-covered floor. I feel not having nappy change facilities in the gents is sexist as firstly it implies that nappy changes are solely womens' work, and secondly it makes it bloody awkward for DH when he is out with the DDs on his own (as he will have to when I'm back to work etc) as he understandably doesn't want to go into the ladies loos to access a baby change facility. Surely now it's 2017 it shouldn't be unreasonable to have baby changing facilities in both the male and female loos?

Where I live (non-UK) there are always accessible facilities. Not that I go into the gents but they have them there too, or outside the loos, or in a separate room. Separate room is rare as we are in the inner city with no space to spare!

Yes it is sexist, but the facilities were probably put in when it was generally considered a womans job to mainly change the baby. But on the other hand more and more venues now do have seperate baby change facilities so both parents can use them. So It depends on the venue and whether they have the room or means to create additional baby change facilities.

Putting some in the mens is a gross idea though as generally the mens always smells like piss imo! I wouldn't have a problem with a man changing a baby in the ladies, but some people might. If I saw a lone man struggling to find somewhere to change baby I'd probably offer to do it for them (had 4, plus been a nanny so seen it all). But yeah you'd think in 2017 most places by now would have sorted this out wouldn't you?

It is sexist. More and more places are changing it as they refurb with in disabled loo or designated loo. It's slow process particularly for independent restaurants. I would imagine one day it will be law though. BIL was a sahp and really struggled sometimes. It's a very outdated setup particularly with the new paternity share options.

This really surprises me, I haven't noticed it myself, seems the standard is a standalone room. Sad that a few are still lurking in women's rooms!

My experience is either that the baby change is in a unisex area (like a disabled loo or a specific baby change area) which is obviously fine, or that they are in the ladies. DH tells me (as obviously I don't go in them) that very few male toilets have baby change facilities.

Most places I go have the baby changing in the accessible toilet.However I feel I must add a mention of my local M&S Simply Food - baby changing in the ladies and the mens loos and lots of floor space for a buggy so you're not getting in everyone's way!Its perfectly doable.

Me and dh often go out with the babies and it's either changing in women's toilets only ( understandably dh won't go in) or if we are lucky you have changing in the disabled toilet. I have NEVER seen a male toilet that says changing facilities

I complained to Welcome Break after we stopped at a service station where the disabled loo / baby change was out of order and the only baby changing facility was in the women's loos, inside a standard-sized cubicle, in the freezing cold because the fire exit was jammed open. It was grim and they did apologise to me - although they couldn't tell me what they would have expected DH to do if he had been on his own with DD.