This website uses cookies to give you the best user experience, for analytics, and improvement of functionalities of this website and third party sites. You can learn more about our use of cookies and similar technologies and your choices by reviewing our Cookies Policy. By clicking "I agree" you agree to our use of cookies and similar technologies.

The item you have requested is not currently available in English and you have been redirected to the next available page. You may use your browser's back button to return to the item you were viewing.

With 125+ locations in 50+ countries, Dentons is home to top-tier talent that is found at the intersection of geography, industry knowledge and substantive legal experience. Working with Dentons, you will have the opportunity to learn from the best lawyers in the industry at the largest law firm in the world.

On January 17, 2014, the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced the revised jurisdictional thresholds for reporting transactions pursuant to the Hart Scott Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the "HSR Act"), and for triggering the prohibition on interlocking directorates, which are governed by Section 8 of the Clayton Act. The new thresholds for HSR notification will become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register (on February 17, 2014). The revisions to Section 8 will become effective upon publication in the Federal Register. The new Section 8 thresholds should be published before the end of January and the HSR changes should be effective before the end of February 2014.

Changes to the Hart Scott Rodino Reporting Thresholds

Filing Threshold

Section 7A of the Clayton Act, commonly known as the HSR Act, requires all persons contemplating certain mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures and corporate and non-corporate formations (e.g., LLCs and LPs), which meet or exceed the HSR Act's jurisdictional thresholds, (1) to notify the FTC Bureau of Competition and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division and (2) to wait the statutory 30-day period before consummating the transaction (unless early termination of the waiting period is granted). Pursuant to the 2000 Amendments to Section 7A, the FTC is required to revise the jurisdictional thresholds annually based on the change in gross national product.

Not Reportable

No transaction resulting in an acquiring person holding an aggregate total amount of voting securities or assets in the acquired party of less than$75.9 million (up from the prior level of $70.9 million) will need to be reported under the rules. (Please note, however, that transactions with values falling below this threshold are still subject to antitrust review by the FTC or the DOJ’s Antitrust Division).

Always Reportable

All acquisitions that result in an acquirer holding an aggregate total amount of the voting securities or assets of the acquired party in excess of $303.4 million (formerly $283.6 million) will be reportable, unless otherwise exempted.

"Size of the Person" Test

Acquisitions valued between $75.9 million and $303.4 million are reportable based on the size of the acquiring person and the size of the acquired person (i.e., "size of the person test"). Generally, the "size of the person test" will require that one side of the transaction have sales or assets of at least $15.2 million (up from $14.2 million) and the other side have sales or assets of at least $151.7 million (up from $141.8 million).

The filing fees will remain the same, and will apply to the revised thresholds as follows:

Value of Assets or Voting Securities to be Held

Fee Amount

greater than $75.9 million but less than $151.7 million

$45,000

$151.7 million or greater but less than $758.6 million

$125,000

$758.6 million or greater

$280,000

Changes to the Thresholds Triggering the Prohibition on Interlocking Directorates

Section 8 of the Clayton Act prohibits a person from serving as a director or an officer of two competing organizations if two thresholds relating to (1) capital, surplus and profits of a certain value; and (2) sales of a certain level. The reason for this prohibition is that if competing organizations share officers or directors, there is a high likelihood that the organizations will not compete with one another, or not compete aggressively. Pursuant to the 1990 Amendment to Section 8, the FTC is required to revise the Section 8 jurisdictional thresholds annually based on the change in gross national product. Effective as of the date the new thresholds are published in the Federal Register, no person can serve as a director or officer of two competing organizations if each competitor has capital, surplus and undivided profits aggregating more than$29,945,000, except that neither corporation is covered if the competitive sales of either corporation are less than$2,994,500. Failure to comply with the prohibition triggered by these thresholds could result in liability under the antitrust laws.

Further information regarding these revisions to the HSR Act and Section 8 of the Clayton Act are available on the FTC website.

Disclaimer

Unsolicited emails and other information sent to Dentons will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others, may not receive a response, and do not create a lawyer-client relationship. If you are not already a client of Dentons, please do not send us any confidential information.

Copy link to Tweet

Embed this Tweet

Important Notice

Please read the following terms and conditions carefully. Access to the information contained herein is on the basis that you understand and agree to these terms and conditions.

The following pages of the website are not addressed to, or intended for use by:
(1) persons located in the United States,
(2) citizens of the United States
(3) permanent residents ('green card holders') of the United States,
(4) entities organized in the United States or their overseas affiliates.

No person or entity falling into any of the above categories has contributed to the creation or provision of any of the information provided in these pages.

Under Sanctions imposed by the US Office of Foreign Assets Control, persons and entities falling into these categories are prohibited from engaging, or facilitating the engagement by others, in any commercial relationship with Iran. If you believe you may fall into any of these categories, do not access these web pages.

Under sanctions imposed by the Government of Canada, Canadian citizens and persons located in Canada should be aware that they are prohibited from engaging in or facilitating the engagement of others in, certain commercial activities involving Iran or certain persons (individuals and entities) in Iran. In addition, the sanctions law of other countries, including the United States, may apply to certain commercial activities by Canadians. Any Canadian or person in Canada who accesses these webpages should seek legal advice on the applicability of Canadian and foreign sanctions before engaging in or facilitating in any commercial activities involving Iran or persons in Iran.

Dentons accepts no liability in respect of any breach of applicable Sanctions arising as a consequence of acting against this advice. The following pages of this website are informational materials only and are not intended to be used, nor may they be used, to engage in, or facilitate the engagement by others in, transactions that are prohibited under the laws of the United States or Canada. For guidance on the applicability of relevant Sanctions, please contact legal counsel. If you would like to engage attorneys at Dentons familiar with these issues please contact : Michael Zolandz, US, Paul Lalonde, Canada

Confirmation of understanding and acceptance of disclaimer

To visit the following pages of the website, you must confirm that you have understood the above sentences and agree to comply with the restrictions and that your use of the following pages is expressly conditioned thereon. By clicking "AGREE" in the box below, you will be deemed to have made this confirmation.

I have read and understood the disclaimer set out above. I understand that it may affect my rights and I agree to be bound by its terms.