As you can see with this vote, elections do have consequences! Let’s not let them turn Pennsylvania into Wisconsin, no matter how many Koch-loving hacks we have in the state house: An attempt to pass a controversial amendment to a bill that would restrict union dues collection from state and school employees’ paychecks narrowly failed […]

So, Utah decided to just give the homeless places to live. The results are what anyone with sense, or who has followed the topic would expect: Utah’s Housing First program cost between $10,000 and $12,000 per person, about half of the $20,000 it cost to treat and care for homeless people on the street. Imagine [...]

For a long time now, I’ve been thinking that feminists dropped the ball after they won Roe v. Wade. Everyone took it down a notch and went back to whatever it was they were doing. The ERA officially died in 1982. I was at Point Park in Pittsburgh at a rally the day it happened. It was important and it was no doubt a very bad thing when it died. But I was young and stupid and I thought at least we have Roe and cheap, plentiful oral contraceptives.

And that’s where we fell into a trap. The right wing had us just where they wanted us. Instead of protecting us, Roe has been used as a political hammer by both parties and as a result, its no longer the protection it was assumed it was. I say assumed because it never was supposed to be a proxy for true equality.

Why are issues that the courts decided so long ago still unresolved? Maybe it is time to recognize that law alone is not enough to effect social change. It must be linked to social activism on behalf of women’s rights.

[…]

We can celebrate Griswold, Roe and all the cases that stemmed from the Poe litigation. They are important landmarks in American jurisprudence. But as I look back I am dismayed by how few of the issues I was fighting for at the time of Poe are resolved. To be sure, we have important rights and more legal privacy. But we still have not provided all the support women need to combine rewarding careers and healthy families. Planned Parenthood is under siege and poor women who are seeking comprehensive reproductive care are still at risk. Presidential candidates can get away with saying that all contraception should be outlawed. Comprehensive child care services are difficult to locate, and fully financed family and medical leave is still controversial.

In short, we won the legal battle but not the war. Women are still not guaranteed control over their lives, because the necessary social supports were never secure. The initial goal of Griswold was to help women — and even though the precedent has helped with same-sex marriage laws, those initial needs, especially of poor women, have been left largely unmet.

The universal coverage plan outlined in President Obama’s Affordable Care Act is a good step forward, and we should do all we can to ensure it. Perhaps if activism had been linked to the lawsuits, the aims I fought for would have been secured, and we would be spared the spectacle of Republican candidates threatening, yet again, a woman’s right to control her own fertility.

She’s right. After we won Roe, we just assumed that social equality would follow on its own. But that was never going to happen if the activists stopped being active. I blame my own generation for this. We straddled the gap between the end of the baby boom and the Gen Xers. We were children during the activist days and too busy breaking new ground in college and careers to pay any attention to what was happening to our rights. It was hard enough to get some professor to notice us or some supervisor to recognize our achievements to go out after work and organize. But without that activism and organization, our accomplishments were illusory. There was no permanent change in the culture except these two flimsy supreme court rulings. That is all we had. And as the right wing started to chip away at them, we didn’t get alarmed enough. Now the right has almost got its way even with the rulings in place and our rights and equality looks like a matrix of swiss cheese.

So, it’s back to the trenches for us or our daughters will not have the privileges that we had in the 70s and 80s. If we’re wondering why we get treated badly at work, it’s because the old boys club knows that there are things society can force women to do that can never be forced on men. It makes us look weak and easy to run over.

It’s still a man’s world out there and we were stupid to think an abortion ruling was going to change that.

[O]n his radio show today, Limbaugh showed no remorse and instead reveled in the attention. Referring to Fluke, Limbaugh demanded that women post sex tapes online if they use insurance-covered birth control:

LIMBAUGH: So Miss Fluke, and the rest of you Feminazis, here’s the deal. If we are going to pay for your contraceptives, and thus pay for you to have sex. We want something for it. We want you post the videos online so we can all watch.

And here’s Rush’s followup. He just can’t seem to stop himself. This man needs help. Or a stiletto shoe in his face. I just can’t decide…

Craig has a handy list of sponsors that you can contact and includes this little tidbit:

Yesterday, I wrote a response to a post by Sarah Lane on google+. Sarah Lane is the bubbly tech blogger who’s a mainstay at Twit.tv. I love Sarah Lane but I don’t like the idea that Carbonite is a sponsor of Twit AND Rush Limbaugh. So, I wrote to ask her what she thought of that? No answer yet but I’m hopeful. I might try Gina Trapani next. Or Leo Laporte, although Leo can come off as a sexist jerk himself on occasion. In fact, I might just want to abstain from Twit and remove its app from my iphone and ipad until they have a word with their sponsor. For sure, I am not using the Twit offer code from Carbonite until Carbonite disassociates itself from Rush.

Now would be a good time for Barack Obama to overcome his Mike Dukakis impression and stand up for women agains this evil bully. It could be a twofer because Rush may push the nuclear option with a really vile racist remark and then we’ll see how far gone the American public truly is. It’s one thing to think uncharitable, ignorant things, things you know are not socially acceptable. It’s quite another thing to say them to the President of the United States. Barack Obama might be an unprincipled schmoozer and a lousy president but that has nothing to do with his race (which is only a social construct anyway).

This is an opportunity for him to act like he’s got some backbone. Someone needs to step in here and level Rush. Maybe Hillary can lend Obama one of her balls. Schedule a news conference and condemn him in the harshest terms. Take a note from Bill Clinton’s evil cowards speech after the Oklahoma City bombing. It’s the right thing to do and I guarantee that it won’t cost the election. It’s not censoring Rush to tell him that his remarks are uncalled for, destructive and reflects badly on American values. Call him out. Do it now.

Previous research had suggested that a woman is born with all the egg cells she will ever have in her lifetime.

But in recent experiments, scientists discovered a new type of stem cell in the ovaries that—when grown in the lab—generates immature egg cells. The same immature cells isolated from adult mouse ovaries can turn into fertile eggs.

Stem cells, found in embryos and certain adult body tissues, have the potential to grow into many different types of cells.

The finding reinforces the team’s previous experiments in mice, which had identified a new type of ovarian stem cell that renews a female mouse’s source of eggs throughout its fertile years.

That study, published in the journal Nature in 2004, was the “first to reach the conclusion that this long-held belief in our field—that young girls are given a bank account at birth that you can no longer deposit eggs to, just withdraw from—was no longer true,”said study leader Jonathan Tilly.

This is good news because if you can collect your stem cells early in your reproductive years and store them, there won’t be as much pressure to have kids before your expiration date. You can have a backup plan and can get back to work doing something else, like research or starting your own business or writing books or something that requires your full attention. Biology isn’t destiny until you’re ready. It’s a good thing.

*****************

This is just cool. Or disturbing, depending how you look at the idea of small flying objects:

NEW YORK -(MarketWatch)- AT&T Inc. T +0.88% is taking a step closer to doing away with unlimited-mobile data-plans.

Under a new policy, AT&T will slow download speeds for unlimited 3G and 4G smartphone customers who exceed 3 gigabytes and 4G LTE users who exceed 5 gigabytes of data in a given month. AT&T had previously been slowing speeds, or throttling, customers who were in the top 5% of data users in their respective market.

AT&T has been trying to manage capacity on its network in the face of heavy data consumption by Apple Inc. (AAPL) iPhone users and a limited supply of wireless airwaves, or spectrum. The carrier is spending billions to build out a new fourth-generation mobile-broadband network that can handle more data traffic.

A spokesman said the new guidelines were necessary because of confusion among unlimited customers over when their download speeds would be slowed. He declined to say by how much the speeds would be decreased.

If you want to know why you’re losing the unlimited data plan on your iPhone, you can blame deregulation of the phone business years ago. I guess when they decided to break up the monopolies to encourage competition, they never thought about whether they should require the phone companies to invest some of their ungodly profits into improving their data networks. So, scarcity, like, you know, works in their favor. They can make you slow down and use less and still charge you a fortune for crappy service. I have ATT and I can barely get a signal in parts of central NJ and in NY City? Fuggeddaboudit. Covering the Occupy events in Zuccotti park was nearly impossible in real time and just drained the battery as the iphone uselessly pinged the sky looking for a signal.

So, does anyone believe that the red beanie boys lost their case against no-cost contraceptives in the health insurance plan because Barack Obama has a deep commitment to women’s reproductive freedom or equality?

Or does he have a problem with women and he needs to throw them *just* enough of a bone to win their votes but not enough to piss off the religious too much?

While the percentage of Democrats who describe themselves as liberal has also increased since 2000, rising ten points, the Democratic Party remains much more ideologically diverse than the G.O.P. Roughly forty per cent of Democrats call themselves “liberal,” forty per cent call themselves “moderate,” and twenty per cent call themselves “conservative.”

So, if moderates are still crucial to Obama’s election, what do they look like? Over at Third Way, Michelle Diggles and Lanae Erickson take a deep dive into the data to show that the real swing vote for Obama is a group they call Obama Independents—voters who “liked and voted for [Obama] just 3 years ago… were the most ideologically moderate segment of the electorate,” and “are true swing voters, with one-quarter voting Republican in 2010 and one-quarter voting for President Bush in 2004.” This group, which we are likely to hear a lot about in the coming months, is disproportionately young, female, and secular, and it was hit hard by the recession. One quarter of its members are non-white.

If Obama goes, so does the free Lo-Ovral.

This is the problem with politicians who do not have a coherent worldview, and Obama never has had one. He has not made any effort to craft policy that will advance women’s equality in the workplace or the doctor’s office. It’s not one of his goals. Failure to plan on your part does not constitute an emergency on his. The problem with Democrats is not that their factions are all over the place. The problem is that they try to cater to these factions without providing a coherent vision for the future. There is nothing that sticks Democrats together under one united idea of how the country and world should work. So, Obama careens from one interest group to another trying to thread the needle between pissing off the religious nutcases, who do have a particular worldview, whether we like it or not, and the rest of us. Plan B is a contraceptive too far. Women should get a majority vote from their family and pastors before an abortion. But contraceptives are probably ok, according to the data mining algorithm.

He’s done the same on the banker/financial sector fiasco. Instead of developing policy and solutions based on an understanding of what is wrong with the economy and having a vision of how it should work, he has taken an ad hoc approach and tries to cut deals with each player individually. That is more of the Teddy Roosevelt model but it leaves us open to more misbehavior by the banks because there still aren’t any rules to keep them from gambling our money away and then expecting the government to bail them out. He should have started with the premise that it is wrong to compensate gamblers for their losses and then figure out how to prevent that from happening again.

Well, you know the rest. Obama is pandering here to his swing voters, who happen to be moderate, secular women of childbearing age, in order to get votes. He’s going to save them a bunch of money between now and November. But that won’t get them better jobs or jobs at all. It won’t prevent Walmart from subtle sexism that prevents women from getting ahead. It won’t make measurements of workplace parameters to prevent “he said/she said” accusations about discrimination that no one will take seriously. He’s not interested in equality. He’s interested in getting re-elected.

No, Obama’s decision to cover contraceptives is a one time only deal. There’s no systemic change to the culture. He is not an agent of change. He is an agent of Obama and women are the worse for it.

Body: This paper, or pre-draft, or sketch, or whatever it is, started out with this title: "With The 12-Point Platform, this won't happen: An aristocracy of credentialism in the 20%." But then I realized I'd gotten in deeper than I thought -- one of those posts were the framework and the notes overwhelm the original idea -- and as it tur […]

This is a big bunch of catch-up, here, 'cause it's been a helluva few weeks. Gaius Publius interviewed Alan Grayson on Virtually Speaking, where Grayson discussed "how he 'cracked the nut' that allows him to get progressive legislation passed. Part of his secret - his goal is to be a person who 'gets things done for the progress […]