MLB Statistics

Historical (past-seasons) WARP is now based on DRA..
cFIP and DRA are not available on a by-team basis and display as zeroes(0). See TOT line for season totals of these stats.Multiple stints are are currently shown —Click to hide.

YEAR

Team

Lg

G

GS

IP

W

L

SV

H

BB

SO

HR

PPF

H/9

BB/9

HR/9

K/9

GB%

BABIP

WHIP

FIP

ERA

cFIP

DRA

DRA-

WARP

2015

HOU

MLB

19

7

55.7

1

1

0

50

21

58

5

104

8.1

3.4

0.8

9.4

31%

.310

1.28

3.42

4.37

109

4.97

116.2

0.0

2016

PHI

MLB

24

24

131.0

8

6

0

129

45

152

21

91

8.9

3.1

1.4

10.4

37%

.325

1.33

4.00

4.12

92

3.54

78.3

2.7

2017

PHI

MLB

15

15

72.0

2

7

0

74

34

68

15

95

9.3

4.3

1.9

8.5

45%

.303

1.50

5.53

5.13

112

5.66

120.5

-0.1

2018

PHI

MLB

31

30

146.7

9

12

0

138

59

161

16

96

8.5

3.6

1.0

9.9

41%

.316

1.34

3.71

4.85

95

4.20

93.9

1.9

2019

PHI

MLB

8

6

32.3

2

2

0

27

16

36

7

96

7.5

4.5

1.9

10.0

39%

.256

1.33

5.29

3.62

113

5.59

119.7

0.0

Career

MLB

97

82

437.7

22

28

0

418

175

475

64

95

8.6

3.6

1.3

9.8

39%

.312

1.35

4.18

4.52

100

4.44

98.3

4.5

Statistics for All Levels

'opp' stats - Quality of opponents faced - have been moved and are available only as OPP_QUAL in the Statistics reports now.Minor league stats are currently shown —Click to hide.

The latter, which is weird to say, because I've been pretty slow to come on the Hader train. I have loved most of what Houston has done, but I think they're really going to come to regret that deal. (Christopher Crawford)

Hey Scooter, what should we think about Vincent Velasquez after these 2 starts to the season?(Jerry from Earth)

He's a great gamble, although there isn't much profit available with him because he's not exactly a secret and he hasn't been for a while. The stuff is obviously legit. His ultimate value this season will depend on his command & control and whether or not he can sustain his stuff over the course of a long season. And wins might be hard to come by in Philly, of course.

I live in Philly and most of the leagues I play in are Philly-based, so if anything, Velasquez went for a higher price or at a higher pick than he should have because everyone here watched him during spring training and fell in love with his upside. (Scooter Hotz)

This is a tremendous and fun group of arms. Nola, Gonzalez, Rodon, Velasquez, E-Rod, Matz. The one who still scares me the most is Rodon. There's a good chance he doesn't fulfill his insane upside because of the command issues stemming from his delivery. While Matz and E-Rod are a tier below for me they are both very valuable arms that could be middle rotation stalwarts. (Mauricio Rubio)

Ross is an intriguing pitcher but his pitch selection is mirroring his brother's approach, including a high rate of SL's that simultaneously raises the injury risk and put the onus on his ability to bury the pitch. I really like Velasquez's delivery and the velo is legit. Iglesias is incredibly advanced for his age. Lorenzen has great stuff but was perhaps promoted before the command was honed, whereas Wisler holds the opposite profile of low ceiling but high floor. Long-term, give me Velasquez-Lorenzen-Wisler-Iglesias-Ross, but in the near-term I would go with Velasquez-Wisler-Ross-Iglesias-Lorenzen. Velasquez is above the others, and development will determine how the rest fall into place. (Doug Thorburn)

Vincent Velasquez what the ceiling on him and when can we expect to see him in the majors? (OB1KENOBI from Tampa)

I can't go higher than a mid rotation ceiling given that the command is not likely to reach plus levels, but I think there's a decent chance he'll throw enough quality strikes to remain a starter. The stuff is quite loud and will allow him to succeed in some sort of a role if he stays healthy, even if it's not in the rotation. I think 2016 is probably the earliest we can expect to see him in the big leagues, but 2017 is more likely. More importantly for now; he looked healthy in the AFL after missing time in the middle of the season. (Todd Gold)

I'm a bit surprised not to see both Vincent Velasquez and Lance McCullers off this list? Both had pretty good years and are expected to get better. Domingo Santana also should have a case as well.
What made you not have them on the list?(YP from Houston)

Other players offered a more convincing case. (Jason Parks on the Top 101 Prospects)