(Natural News)
In a move that is sure to get liberal snowflakes rushing to their safe spaces faster than ever, Princeton University is now encouraging students
to report “problematic experiences based on [their] identity.” This
means that if students find themselves in a situation that makes them
feel offended or uncomfortable in anyway, they can – and should,
according to Princeton – go tell somebody about it, even if it is
something that normally wouldn’t result in disci

It’s said that about 80 percent of New Year’s resolutions are abandoned by the second week of February.1
This means if you made one for 2018, there’s a good chance it may
already have failed. There’s also a sizable number of people who set no
goals at all, New Year’s resolutions or otherwise, in part because they
may not realize the importance of goal setting and in part because they
may not know how to do it.2
There are other reasons why you may avoid goal setting as well,

(Natural News)
Beginning shortly after President Donald J. Trump defeated Hillary
Clinton in the 2016 election, Americans were treated to a steady diet of
stories from the American Pravda media claiming that he “colluded” with
the Russian government to “steal the election.”
For months information meant to substantiate the claim, made in the
absence of any real evidence, was “leaked” to various news outlets known
to be friendly to Clinton, Democrats, and every known enemy

Industry propaganda: New Food Evolution movie called out by experts for promoting corporate agenda, GMOs, agrichemicals

(Natural News)
According to the Cambridge Dictionary,
propaganda can be defined as “information, ideas, opinions, or images,
often only giving one part of an argument, that
are broadcast, published, or in some other way spread with the
intention of influencing people’s opinions.” By that definition, the
movie Food Evolution is nothing more than straight-up propaganda for Big Agri companies like Monsanto and DuPont.

Though it claims to fairly examine both sides of the argument
regarding genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the film is heavily
slanted in favor of the use of genetic engineering, and presents any
argument questioning this technology as “pseudoscience.”

Though on the surface it might appear to be an unbiased look at GMOs,
just a little digging reveals all sorts of industry ties, and it soon
becomes obvious that Food Evolution’s sole purpose is to serve as a platform for industry messaging and propaganda.

The film was officially sponsored by the Institute for Food
Technologies (IFT), which is a trade group that is at least partly
funded by Big Food. In addition, when the film was originally planned
back in 2014, IFT’s president was a former Monsanto and DuPont executive
named Janet Collins. She now works for the pesticide trade association,
CropLife America.

While both the film’s director and producer insist that it conveys
all points of view regarding GMOs, and that it represents the results of
a completely independent investigation, the only science and scientists
that are presented as credible in the documentary are those that
support genetic engineering. All other points of view are ignored or
dismissed as unscientific.

One of the strongest points the film seeks to convey is the idea that
glyphosate – the main ingredient in Monsanto’s toxic weed killer,
Roundup – is absolutely safe. From an industry perspective it is vitally
important to change the public’s perception of glyphosate, since most
GM crops (between 80 and 90 percent) are adapted to tolerate being
bathed in this chemical.

One farmer interviewed for the film even stated as a fact that
glyphosate has “very, very low toxicity; lower than coffee, lower than
salt.” And when asked a question about the link between glyphosate and
cancer, Monsanto’s executive vice president and chief technology
officer, Robb Fraley, dismissed any science confirming such as a link as
“pseudoscience.”