I must object to the line about the [[Paramount Queen]] of -7 [[EC]]. In that article, she is clearly said to have been Xuriental. It was her being covered in [[User:MorbusIff|brown fluid]] that so shocked Ghyllian public opinion. --[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]] 14:31, 17 May 2005 (EDT)

−

Another point: you use Daydream Believer like a proper name, but in [[Egron]] it appears to be the name of a role or category of people. This can be salvaged by referring to ''the'' Daydream Believer, with emphasis. --[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]] 14:33, 17 May 2005 (EDT)

Another point: you use Daydream Believer like a proper name, but in [[Egron]] it appears to be the name of a role or category of people. This can be salvaged by referring to ''the'' Daydream Believer, with emphasis. --[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]] 14:33, 17 May 2005 (EDT)

+

+

:I cannot help how he refers to himself and has been come to be known. It may be confusing to those who cannot seperate the singular definate and the plural indefinate. Such as a Zhur and many Zhur. --[[User:Tobaine|Tobaine]] 08:20, 19 May 2005 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 10:50, 21 May 2005

Another point: you use Daydream Believer like a proper name, but in Egron it appears to be the name of a role or category of people. This can be salvaged by referring to the Daydream Believer, with emphasis. --John Cowan 14:33, 17 May 2005 (EDT)

I cannot help how he refers to himself and has been come to be known. It may be confusing to those who cannot seperate the singular definate and the plural indefinate. Such as a Zhur and many Zhur. --Tobaine 08:20, 19 May 2005 (EDT)