but taliing someone after a wicked line movement goes against the fighter? especially when the fighters are not high profile and more or less obscure in which the line movement is probably related to inside info as opposed to public perception?

i would venture to say that less than 10 percent of the people here have ever even seen both perez and stone fight.

Definitely nothing wrong with blindly tailing. However blindly tailing, then making you first appearance in the forum bitching about it is pretty shitty.

Ken Stone has been in some pretty high profile fights for a guy on the undercard. Erik Perez, likely not. However I am very familiar with both. I've actually seen Perez fight live 3 times. Only once in the UFC.

weve all seen wicked line movements before (most recently frankie going from a +160 to a +200) but these are movements that are influenced by the public as these are high-profile fighters that all the fans have seen.

an unknown fighter such as perez getting heavy betting action is not public money until after the fact.

i dont want to sound harsh as we are all here to make money but everyone that bet stone after that movement has absolutely no excuse.

i couldnt believe it when i saw experienced cappers here going for it.

weve all seen wicked line movements before (most recently frankie going from a +160 to a +200) but these are movements that are influenced by the public as these are high-profile fighters that all the fans have seen.

an unknown fighter such as perez getting heavy betting action is not public money until after the fact.

i dont want to sound harsh as we are all here to make money but everyone that bet stone after that movement has absolutely no excuse.

i couldnt believe it when i saw experienced cappers here going for it.

I was pretty sure when I played it at +money that it was going to come back to the favorite. I was very surprised.

I can't speak for anyone else though that bet it at a much higher number.