Marijuana ban riles pot-friendly residents

By Ashley Bunton and Janie Har - Record-Herald and the Associated Press

A ban on medical marijuana in the City of Washington Court House has riled some pot-friendly residents who wrote to the Record-Herald recently on Facebook.

Ohio picked the first of its 11 medical marijuana growers earlier this year but some cities have already passed resolutions banning medical marijuana before distribution officially begins in 2018. The cities of Blue Ash, Sharonville, Morraine, West Carrollton, Hilliard, and Dublin have recently placed bans on medical marijuana. Washington Court House City Council passed a local resolution in October that prohibits marijuana dispensaries from dispensing medical marijuana in the city.

In response to the Record-Herald article about the city’s ban on medical marijuana, residents wrote comments on Facebook that they support the medical marijuana initiative. Here are some of the top comments from Record-Herald readers on Facebook:

Theresa Angeletti: “If it is for medical purposes i see no harm in it. Maybe it would help lower the amount of people harming their selves by doing harsher drugs. Trust me i am totally against drugs but some prescribed meds are probably worse than weed.”

Mike Callahan: “So disappointed that the city council would follow flawed thinking and not seek medical council before they made a decision. They could have easily went on the American Cancer Society website to see some of the benefits of medical marijuana and cancer…Regardless of my personal biases regarding the benefits, it also would have been beneficial for them to look at the requirements for operation. That alone would have convinced them that this is not a drive through operation. Most likely it would have been one of the tightest security in town. Finally, do we really have to do our absolute best at keeping any kind of industry out of our county? Disappointing.”

Scotty Frederick: “Way to go council. Hard to tell how much money could’ve been made from taxes. By the looks of the city’s failing infrastructure and lack of new business and jobs the council has been failing. It’s ok. A nearby community will seize the opportunity and collect the money. Great job!”

As cities write their own rules, residents in states where marijuana was recently legalized for recreational use are becoming increasingly riled over rulemaking, according to reports from the Associated Press.

In California’s famously pro-cannabis San Francisco, where the 4/20 marijuana holiday is celebrated with a group smoke-out on Hippie Hill, the city is having a surprisingly difficult time establishing regulations for the broad legal pot market coming to the state in January.

Writing local rules in the weed-friendly city has taken a contentious turn as critics, many of them older Chinese immigrants who oppose marijuana use, try to restrict where pot can be sold.

Divided San Francisco supervisors are scheduled to take up the issue at a board meeting Tuesday, where they may vote on a stop-gap measure to allow the sale of recreational cannabis through existing medical marijuana outlets on Jan. 1 as they continue to figure out where to allow new stores.

The possibility of overly strict regulations has businesses fretting over access and some San Franciscans wondering what happened to the counter-culture, anti-Prohibition city they know and love. The smell of cannabis being smoked is not uncommon in certain neighborhoods and parks.

“Let’s be honest: Cannabis is effectively legal now and the sky hasn’t fallen. A lot of the information people have been given is completely false,” said Supervisor Jeff Sheehy, who uses medical marijuana to mitigate pain from older HIV medications.

He and others are calling for keeping recreational retail pot stores 600 feet (183 meters) away from schools, comparable to the radius required of stores that sell liquor or tobacco. Medical marijuana dispensaries are required to be at least 1,000 feet (305 meters) away from schools and recreation centers that primarily serve minors.

But some Chinese-American organizations have pushed back, calling for an outright prohibition on retail stores in San Francisco’s Chinatown. They want future retail stores to be at least 1,500 feet (460 meters) away from schools, child-care centers and any other place minors gather. Supervisors are considering a 1,000-foot (305-meter) buffer that cannabis advocates say is too restrictive for a city as compact as San Francisco.

Ellen Lee, family social worker at the nonprofit San Francisco Community Empowerment Center, which has helped lead the protests, said most of the people opposed to recreational cannabis are elderly and speak little to no English. She said children are impressionable and must be protected from a drug that remains illegal under federal law, and she is frustrated by elected officials.

“We have been meeting with them and talking to them,” she said, “but they are not listening.”

Chinese-Americans are an integral part of San Francisco’s history and they carry political clout in a city where one-third of its 850,000 residents are Asian and Chinese-Americans are the largest Asian sub-group. The mayor is Chinese-American, as are other elected officials in the city.

Supervisor Aaron Peskin said Monday he has a holdover measure that will allow 46 existing medical marijuana facilities to sell to adults while the board takes more time to hash out zoning regulations. He said that would allow people plenty of places to buy cannabis come Jan. 1.

Peskin, who represents the Chinatown district, said he expects the board will come up with a resolution that satisfies most people in the diverse city.

“We’re not just legislators. We are group therapists for 850,000 people and understanding what their concerns are, whether we agree or disagree, and addressing them respectfully is very important in the legislative process,” he said.