John Lewis wrote:
[snip]
> dl/dt/dd are good names. You haven't provided me with a good reason
> why we need new names, or why dl/dt/dd are bad names. (You say the
> benefits of good names are "widely accepted," but you don't list any.
> You also haven't explained why dl/dt/dd are bad names--unless being
> unintuitive means bad.)
That is exactly the point : unintuitive means "bad". Period.
Philip Taylor, RHBNC