That's rather meaningless to this debate. What do you mean by
"define"? If by 'define', you mean to quantify, then let's look at
how you quantify it. You've done so by using the progession of yet
another process in order to compare it to the motion to which you're
referring.

Explain to me where you got your standard of time, except by using
the progression of another process.

I'm glad to see that you've kept an open mind. Anyway, I'm not sure
what you're asking. I don't have to explain motion. It simply
exists, and I observe it. But if you're asking me to quantify
motion, I fully agree that the use of the tool we created as an
intellectual concept is very useful for doing that. But then, that
tool relies, in turn, on the progression of yet another process.

What's your standard for a unit of time, if not the progression of
another process?

I embrace the conept of time. It's an incredibly useful tool that I
don't want to do without. But that's ALL that it is...... a
concept.

I never said that it didn't exist. I said that it exists only in
our minds, and not in the physical realm.

What is this obession with 'explaining' motion? Motion is a
obserable. If you mean to quatify it, you can do that with any
intellectual tools you wish, but that doesn't amke them any thing
other then an intellectual concept. Time is the comparison of the
progression of one physical process with another one that's used as
a standard. If I'm wrong, show me.

We can have motion with \out any observes because motion exists. Do
you really think that motion would not exist without observers?

Right, and yet, motion still exists. It doesn't need to be
quantified or explained in order to exist.

Not true. There was a sequence, which means that it's a memory,
which is an intelectual process, which means that it's irrlelvant to
what is. And even beyond that, the sequence is what it is, and we
use the concept of time to conceptualize and describe and
communicate about the sequence. It exists as a tool.

But again and again I keep asking how we came to a standard of time
except through the use of the progression of yet another process.