loading assets

Jul 13, 2016

Why There Will Probably Be a Second Referendum of Brexit – Ambition of international-corporate dictatorship system is unlikely to be realized. –

Why There Will Probably Be a Second Referendum of Brexit – Ambition of international-corporate dictatorship system is unlikely to be realized. –

It seems that the writer of the article
below thinks it is likely that Britain will finally remain in EU in despite of
the referendum result supporting Brexit. He thinks that Britain will see
completely different situation like Greece because the referendum result is not
conclusive one but it is used as reference.

According to the article, the significance
of the referendum is that UK citizens “refused control by European aristocracy
elite” of EU. However, eventually they will try to control such civil rebellion
and achieve their dream of international-corporate dictatorship “by all means”,
because it will be the Bilderbergers’ dream, the Trilateralists’ dream, and the
Davos dream.

I think that the writer really understands
what is happening in the world. However, I affirm that the result will be
completely opposite. Their ambition will never be realized. Prime Minister of
Greece Tsipras acts dead but he should be ready to rise up when the right time
comes. I can’t find deadness in his eyes. We are witnessing the very beginning
of destruction of “the dream of international dictatorship by international
aristocracy.”

July
4, 2016

Masatoshi
Takeshita

Note:

Shanti-phula has indicated some parts of
the following text in black boldface type or in red letters.

Brexit
(British exit from the European Union) would be a ferocious kidney-blow to the
international aristocracy, the people (and their agents) whoown
controlling blocs of stock in international corporations,
and who control politicians in every country (except Russia and perhaps China),
and who especially control international organizations such
as the executive body
of the EU, which is the European
Commission (or “EC”). The EC, the
executive power within the EU, is an appointed not
elected body; each of its members can be fired, at will, by the President of
the EC,who
is the real President of the EU, who is himself appointed as a result of
deal-making amongst appointees who were selected by deal-making amongst elected
politicians from each one of the nations that’s a member-state of the EU.

*snip*

A
career in “public service” at the EU is, essentially, service to the European
aristocracy, not to the public.

The
President of the EC has enormous power over Europe: he drafts, and the entire
EC rubber-stamps, all laws within the EU dictatorship.

*snip*

British
exit from the European Union would therefore constitute a public rejection of
this entire system, and a public preference for restoring
the given nation’s democracy — it would
constitute a public rejection
of rule by Europe’s aristocracy.

*snip*

The
British Situation

UK
has no written constitution, and so the UK government “wings it” on matters
such as determining when a public vote in a referendum (such as Brexit) is
actually final.

*snip*

UK
will very likely remain in EU; democracy will
probably be irrevocably dead in UK, from that
time forward; the major stockholders in international corporations will then
rigidly control the country.

*snip*

As
far as other countries in EU are concerned, all of which do have written
Constitutions, those Constitutions will become less and less effective over
time, as the EU’s international-corporate dictatorship will increasingly take
precedence, in the emerging United States of Europe.It
will be the
Bilderbergers’ dream, the Trilateralists’ dream, the Davos dream: international
dictatorship, by the international aristocracy.

The
words mightsuperficially
sound pleasant, butthe outcome will be hell.
And here that
hell is described regarding U.S. President Barack Obama’s
proposed TPP treaty for Pacific nations, which is similar to
his proposed TTIP and TISA treaties for
Atlantic nations (including Europe): regulations
regarding the environment, workers’ rights, and product-safety, will be
whatever international corporations want them to be; democracy, the sovereignty
of the public, will end.

The
attitude of the people in power (the people who control those corporations) is:
the world can simply go to hell; I need my profits.

*snip*

Governments
exist to serve investors, not citizens. Citizens have instead become mere
subjects, of the aristocracy. It’s a return to feudalism, but in the era of
corporations, a body-politic that Benito Mussolini called — and championed as
— “corporationism” (or,
alternatively, as “fascism”).

The
significance of the first Brexit vote is:
it was the first instance in modern times when UK citizens
formally expressed their opposition to what
the UK’s aristocracy desire.However,
the outcome of that vote is likely to be the same (though by
different means) as was the outcome of the Greek
referendum regarding the international
aristocracy’s 2015 ‘bailout’ (their euphemism for purchase) of the Greek
government. In that case, the 5 July 2015 Greek referendum vote was, by a 61%
majority, to reject the sale of the nation’s government. The wikipedia article on that matter closes
by noting: “On Monday, 13 July, the Syriza-led government of Greece
accepted a bailout package that contains larger pension cuts and tax increases
than the one rejected by Greek voters in the referendum.” And that was the end
of that.

*snip*

It’ll
probably be basically the same end-result in UK as it was in Greece. People
must accept their fate, as subjects. Western history is going
full-circle back to feudalism, but in its modern form: ‘peaceful’
fascism.

The
message of that, if all of this comes to pass, will be, from the masters: Welcome
to the future; it belongs to me and my children, not to you and your children.
We own it, you don’t. Just get out of our way, because we’ll get there, by hook
or by crook, no matter what you do.