The entire manual was turned into a series of web pages. As such it was modified in respect to formatting and usability. In addition, the college moved to a new curriculum-development software, CurricUNET META, which modified substantially some processes and practices and eliminated others.

Section 2.3: Removal and renaming and renumbering of entire sections no longer applicable due to new processes within CurricUNET

Old formatting and template sections completely removed/replaced.

General Description Section 2.3.4 (new 2.3.2): removed discussion of all general description components except course number and title. Within number instructions, removed references to subject, as these are now chosen from drop-down list.

Course Specifics Section:

Hours -- only total hours now entered.

Requisites -- updated to new language and workflow processes, in which old system of paper forms running a parallel process of review with Office of Matriculation, is now integrated into normal course proposal review process.

Student Learning Outcomes -- updated to reflect new SLO processes, primarily by referring to resources on SLO website including the SLO Handbook and removing from this handbook the duplication of the two handbooks. SLO Handbook was also updated to reflect this change.

Textbook and Other Instructional Materials -- added websites and changed language to indicate that CurricUNET will ensure proper formatting and citation. Follow instructions on the CurricuNET screens.

Old Title V (Section 7) Section: Revision of outline requirements, as Title V classification information is now embedded in course outline of record, based on course type. This section was deleted and merged with 2.2.2 (duplicate information). The automatic nature of this information being added to the course outline is also referenced in the Course Outline overview (2.3.1).

Chapter 3

Sections 3.2.3 & 3.3.3 -- Creating/Modifying/Deleting proposals: Updated language to ensure that all new addendums must already have a current and approved course outline "no more than six years old".

Update Requisite chapter -- specifically the section on the number of people that must be consulted re: Content Review. Really 3? -- Check with Kitty

Revisit Assignments Section (2.3.9) re: Information Competency. With some exceptions, degree-applicable courses should require students to demonstrate information competency by completing a research project that includes evaluation of printed and electronic sources, and proper citation and format. -- Agenda discussion at CC meeting.

Revise process/documentation for program submission -- since State docs are not part of CurricuNET BUT are indicated in HB that they are required to be submitted to the CC (end of 4 or 5.2.2) -- wait until CTE process to come back.

Guidance in Chapter 9 about the various review levels, and the guidance to Curriculum Committee members about reviewing course outlines, course outline addenda, and certificate and degree programs, was significantly rewritten to reflect current practice and give more clear guidance to new committee members.