Why long-term homeowners save on tax in many states

Most Read

America's housing market is booming with home prices nationwide now back to where they were a decade ago, just before the financial crisis

A study of state tax regimes reveals that new homebuyers are disadvantaged in many US states.

The research found that in Los Angeles for example, a new owner of a median-valued home pays around $7,000 per year in property taxes, while someone who’s owned an identical home for 14 years pays just $4,000 per year.

The annual 50-State Property Tax Comparison Study by the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy and the Minnesota Center for Fiscal Excellence, found that of the ten American cities with the greatest discrepancy in taxes paid by new homeowners and longtime homeowners, six are in California and two are in Florida. That’s due to state laws limiting reassessment.

Across more than 100 cities, the study concludes that those that rely on property taxes, rather than increasing sales and income taxes, have the highest effective rates of property tax.

However, another key reason for higher property tax rates is lower property values, requiring cities to impose larger effective rates to achieve a comparable level of tax revenue enjoyed by areas with more expensive homes.

The average effective tax rate on a median-valued home was 1.49 percent in 2017, with wide variation across cities. Three cities have effective tax rates that are roughly 2.5 times higher than the average – Bridgeport (CT), Aurora (IL), and Detroit. Conversely, seven cities have tax rates less than half of the study average – Honolulu, Charleston (SC), Boston, Cheyenne (WY), Denver, Birmingham, and Washington, DC.

Highest and Lowest Effective Property Tax Rates on a Median-Valued Home (2017)