Since 1984, the winner of this game during election years has directly correlated with the party affiliation of the winner of the presidential election, with LSU connected to the GOP and Alabama connected to the Democratic party.

If you didn't watch the game, Alabama won a very close game.

---------- Post added 2012-11-04 at 02:22 AM ----------

Originally Posted by Vyxn

Let me fill you in on how the investigation on finding and questioning the suspects linked to the attack in Benghazi, because you must only be looking for that information on Liberal web sites.

Vyxn, if you have the time, could you provide us with a list of "liberal sites" so that we can be further educated and know where we shouldn't go for information? Or, if it's easier for you, provide a list of "non-liberal sites" that we can trust will give us the right information?

It's exhausting to keep up, especially when we find out from you that places like the Examiner is not the conservative libertarian "rag" we thought it was(and claims to be), but just another "liberal rag". Perhaps you can edit a wikipedia(or conservapedia if wikipedia is a liberal site) page that gives us the lists so we can quickly determine whether to trust the source or not. It might be wise to put a big asterisk at the top that says "Site distinction may change depending on whether I feel like the information they put out is liberal or not."

Any chance obama or any democrat comes out and criticizes the unions? Probably after they vote on the 6th, but turning away help when your state needs it is baffling. Why is the governor and the mayor of New York ignoring the fact unions would not let people help unless they joined a union? This board is so liberal/democrat leaning it is ridiculous, where is the outrage? Why are none of you asking why unions can turn away help when states are in disasters? Why is obama doing nothing about it? Oh wait, he needs to jet off to Vegas.

Obama steps in and takes action: Conservatives say "Why is Obama meddling in state affairs! Leave them alone we dont need big government!"

Obama does nothing: Conservatives say "Why is Obama doing nothing about this? He needs to jet off to Vegas"

But as Wells said, the story is horseshit. I work for a utility company, and was listening to Hannity go on and on and on about this, which is probably where you are getting your information.

It's about fair and balanced. Liberal sources like Chis Christy are all praising Obama's reaction to Sandy. To be fair and balanced, fox news criticizes him, even if they have to make things up to achieve the balance.

---------- Post added 2012-11-04 at 04:09 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Spectral

What in the actual fuck is it that a politician can do while standing in closer physical proximity to a natural disaster that they can't do via phone?

One of the moocher 47% in NYC mayor Bloomberg even asked Obama not to come, while supporting him in reelection, and the liberal darling Chris Christy praised Obama's effort. It's fox seeking balance, by making shit up.

What in the actual fuck is it that a politician can do while standing in closer physical proximity to a natural disaster that they can't do via phone?

Obama has the capacity to engage in fisticuffs with a hurricane. He simply doesn't because beating down a hurricane would have looked worse for him than helping the victims. What a jerk.

“A fool is not a person who does not know something. Rather, a fool is a person who is given information but who chooses to ignore what he is given based on how he wants things to be, rather than how things are."

You want to talk about being divisive, the praise Obama is getting is across party lines. Sandy has unified independents like mayor Bloomberg, republicans like Chris Christy with a democrat Obama. It takes fox to look for a divide, even create one where it does not exist. It should be an example of the divisive rhetoric that fox is influencing.

What's next? Fox is going to dress someone like a pimp to try and get storm relief funds, to show how democrats just give money to pimps?

The one good thing that'll work out for people that really hate Obama is that they can just blame all their person failures on Obama. It's nice to know you've never personally fucked anything up, I imagine.

I think the reaction to the storm changed my opinion on Chris Christy. I saw him as a blow hard, but in time of crisis, it seems to be exactly what people need. Two thumbs way up for Christy, much respect.

I think the reaction to the storm changed my opinion on Chris Christy. I saw him as a blow hard, but in time of crisis, it seems to be exactly what people need. Two thumbs way up for Christy, much respect.

I like Christie. I disagree with him about a lot, and I think he's factually wrong fairly regularly, but I don't think he's willfully bullshitting me, and I think he really is attempting to do his level best. Sure, he's blowhardy, but he's from Jersey, so I cut him some slack there.

Obama has the capacity to engage in fisticuffs with a hurricane. He simply doesn't because beating down a hurricane would have looked worse for him than helping the victims. What a jerk.

Well, because nature if feminine and because we live with the Earth it would have been a very serious case of domestic abuse, beating up one of mother nature's children and all.

Originally Posted by Masark

People in cars cause accidents. Accidents in cars cause people.

Sometimes life gives you lemons, other times life gives you boobies. Life is always better with more boobies.
Blizzard removed my subscription from WoD's features, it'll be added sometime later.
And thus I give you: MALE contraception!

On Saturday night, Iranian MP Mohammad Hassan Asafari was misquoted by opposition websites and the Saudi-owned al-Arabiya as saying that Tehran had already stopped 20% enrichment. Asafari had only signalled in his comments to Iran's Isna news agency that Iran would be ready to temporarily stop enrichment to 20% if sanctions were lifted.

It vindicates Obama's strategy at this time. Kalyyn was claiming that Iran was just trying to help Obama get reelected because he's weaker than Romney. That didn't stand up to reason then but even less so now.

It vindicates Obama's strategy at this time. Kalyyn was claiming that Iran was just trying to help Obama get reelected because he's weaker than Romney. That didn't stand up to reason then but even less so now.

I think it stands up for the exact same amount of reason whether they were cutting or would cut if sanctions were reduced. None. Iran is equally concerned with Obama as they are Romney as either one of them is likely going to get us into another war if the Iranian government doesn't stand down on the nuclear ambitions.