The "war on terror" is a fraud and dangerous threat
to the American people and republic.

It is nothing more than a Zionist deception that has been
used to manipulate the U.S. military to wage war on Israel's behalf while
imposing a centralized police command under the guise of "homeland security"
throughout the United States.

Democrats and Republicans in Congress have been bickering recently about
using the phrase "global war on terror" in the 2008 budget for expenditures
of untold billions of dollars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere.

"Tell Bush and Blair that our marketing tests showed that 92% of
Goys react favorably to the phrase War on Terror, whereas War
on Al-Qaeda and Defend the Motherland were nearly useless."

Democrats say they are tired of the Bush administration's use of the blanket
term "war on terror" to justify huge budgets for non-specific military
operations.

Erin Conaton, the Democratic staff director of the House Armed Services
Committee, urged aides in a March 27 memo to "avoid using colloquialisms,"
such as the term "global war on terrorism." The staff was directed
to be more specific when preparing the 2008 defense authorization bill.

The "global war on terror," a phrase first used by President George
W. Bush shortly after the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, should not
be used, the memo said.

Staff members were directed to use specific references, such as "the
war in Iraq," the "war in Afghanistan, "operations in the Horn of Africa,"
or "ongoing military operations throughout the world."

"This is a philosophical and political question," the GOP aide told
the Military Times. "Republicans generally believe that by fighting
the war on terror in Iraq, we are preventing terrorists from spreading
elsewhere and are keeping them engaged so they are not attacking us at
home."

Rep. Ike Skelton (D-Mo.), the committee chairman, defended banning the
terms saying in a statement that the Republicans' "objections to our efforts
to clarify legislative language represent the typical Republican leadership
attempt to tie together the misadventure in Iraq and the overall war against
terrorists.

"The Iraq war is separate and distinct from the war against terrorists,
who have their genesis in Afghanistan and who attacked us on 9/11, and
the American people understand this," Skelton said.

WHAT IS THE "WAR ON TERROR?"

Although it's hard to say what the "American people" understand, it
is very clear that Skelton does not understand who is really behind 9/11
and the "war on terror."

What the "American people" understand about the nebulous and fraudulent
"war on terror" is difficult to gauge, but judging from the disinformation
provided by the mass media, it appears that there is widespread ignorance
about what it is and who is behind it.

Although 9/11 and the subsequent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have drastically
changed the way Americans live and think, there is no evidence, in the
media or elsewhere, to suggest that "the American people" understand what
the "war on terror" is, against whom or how its being fought, or who provides
the information that decision makers like Rep. Skelton rely on.

The incredible scenes of destruction at the World Trade Center and the
Pentagon, witnessed by millions of television viewers, profoundly affected
the sense of peace and security that Americans have long enjoyed.

Creating a radical change in how Americans viewed the world was clearly
one of the goals, perhaps the ultimate purpose, of the architectural-level
planners of the 9/11 attacks. "Interpreting" what 9/11 meant to Americans
is where Israeli "experts" on terrorism and the Zionist-controlled media
played the key roles.

One month after 9/11, for example, Newsweek's Arlene Getz interviewed
Shabtai Shavit, the former director of Israel's Mossad. "It may sound
dramatic," Shavit said, "but life in America is not going to be the same
as it used to be before Sept. 11."

Getz had asked Shavit what advice he would give to Americans who, after
9/11, faced "the kind of uncertainty that Israelis have lived with for
years?"

"That’s a good question," Shavit said. "It has to do with how you convince
your people and how you educate them to an entirely new situation [in]
the United States. It may sound dramatic, but life in America is not going
to be the same as it used to be before Sept. 11. In order to be able to
go on living, you have to be aware of the fact that you are going to have
to give up some of your formal liberties, and you have to be ready to give
up some of your pleasantries and conveniences."

Shavit, who joined the Mossad in 1964, is the chairman of the Institute
for Counter-Terrorism at the Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) in Herzliya,
Israel. The IDC is "Mossad University" where colleges and programs
are named after wealthy U.S. Zionists like Samuel Zell, Ronald Lauder,
and Marc Rich who sponsor and fund the university tied to Israeli intelligence.

Sam Zell, for example, the new owner of Wrigley Field and the Chicago
Cubs, The Chicago Tribune, The Los Angeles Times, and a host of mass media
properties, sponsors the Zell Entrepreneurship Program for 20 specially
chosen Israeli students at the IDC.

Shavit's prediction has indeed become reality. Burdened with two
costly and disastrous wars and an increasingly intrusive Department of
Homeland Security, it is safe to say that most Americans would prefer a
return to the way things used to be rather than to continue to live under
the constant fear and insecurity the mass media has subjected the nation
to since 9/11.

Shabtai Shavit was Director General of the Mossad from 1989
to 1996.

He is now a member of the New York City Fire
Department Task Force for Future Preparedness Against Terrorism, among
other programs, as mentioned here.

Shavit and senior level officers in the Mossad and Israeli military
intelligence clearly had prior knowledge of the events of 9/11:

In order to liberate our nation from the burdensome "war of terror,"
which has been the main focus and preoccupation of the Bush administration,
it is essential that we understand what this "war" really is and who is
actually behind it.

To free ourselves from the tyranny of the "war on terror," we need to
do more than eliminate it as a phrase in the defense budget; we need to
inform ourselves and understand the falsehoods and deception upon which
this fraud is based.

Exposing the fraud behind the "war on terror" is much more than an academic
exercise; this is a matter of vital importance for the citizens – and the
future of the republic. The American way of life and our constitutional
freedoms are threatened by the "homeland security" apparatus that was established
as a response to 9/11 and which continues to grow in size and power.

A FALSE CONSTRUCT

The so-called "war on terror" is a false and artificial construct that
has been designed by Zionist right-wing extremists from the highest levels
of the Israeli government and military. It is based on a series of
"false flag" terror attacks which began in the 1990s, including the first
bombing of the World Trade Center, the bombing of the Oklahoma federal
building, and attacks on U.S. targets abroad.

A brief video introduction to false flag operation
is at the top of this page:HowToHelp.html

The "war on terror" concept is the cornerstone of an agenda that has
been actively promoted and articulated since the mid-1980s by Benjamin
Netanyahu, the former right-wing prime minister of Israel.

The "war on terror" is, in fact, the Israeli-designed war for the United
States to engage in as a response to a string of "false flag" terror attacks
that culminated with the destruction of the twin towers of the World Trade
Center. It is meant to create fear and hatred for Islam and bring
the armies of the western "democracies" into the Middle East to defeat
and control the enemies of Israel.

Today, Americans are unduly burdened with this fraudulent "war on terror,"
which has been foisted on the nation by Mr. Netanyahu and a network of
Israeli right-wing extremists and their sponsors and supporters in the
United States.

Both the U.S.-led military invasions overseas and domestic security
state apparatus were planned long before 9/11. These radical changes
have been "interpreted" and explained to the American people by the Zionist-controlled
media.

Corrupt or gullible government officials have been spoon-fed the fraudulent
Zionist explanations and agenda, which are based on an utterly false "interpretation"
of 9/11. Senior government and military officials have accepted this
foreign agenda without even demanding to see the evidence or putting it
through a critical examination.

While there is abundant evidence that Israeli intelligence agencies
were involved in the terror attacks of 9/11, this line of investigation
is taboo in the Zionist-controlled mainstream media and so-called "truth
movement."

Rather than calling for a rigorous and independent investigation of
the facts and evidence, senior government officials and the controlled
media have accepted and promoted an unproven fairy tale in which the culprits
are all Arabs and Moslems.

Five years later, the same Israeli politicians and intelligence officials
who interpreted 9/11 for the U.S. government and media are now controlling
the discussion about how the United States should respond to future threats
of terrorism.

Shabtai Shavit, for example, and senior Israeli military intelligence
officers are still informing and guiding the U.S. response, the so-called
"war on terror."

"Step this way tothe War on Terror!"

WHOSE AGENDA IS IT?

The recent "Report of the Future of Terrorism Task Force" to Michael
Chertoff, the Israeli-American Secretary of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), illustrates how the agenda of Israel's military intelligence
agencies has effectively become the agenda of the United States government.
The report, which took 5 months to produce, was published on January 25,
2007.

When it comes to the Middle East, the U.S. military and intelligence
agencies have depended on Israeli information for decades. The Future
of Terrorism Task Force, part of the Homeland Security Advisory Council,
is no different.

The task force consults with and is informed by "key subject matter
experts." The most obvious heavy hitters among the terrorism "experts"
are two Israeli generals, namely Yosef "Yossi" Kuperwasser and Yisrael
Ziv of something called Comprehensive Security Transformation or "CST International."

CST is apparently an informal troika of Kuperwasser, Ziv, and Brigadier
General Amos Ben-Avraham, a veteran of the army's elite Sayeret Matkal
unit. CST provides "unique, comprehensive and tailored responses
to evolving terror threats," according to its webpage.

Oddly enough, although more than 3,200 American soldiers have died in
Iraq in the so-called "war on terror," not one U.S. military official participated
in the production of this report.

The key "finding" of the "Future of Terrorism" report is that "there
is every indication that the number and magnitude of attacks on the United
States, its interests and its allies will likely increase." Everything
else in the report follows from this dire assumption.

BRIG. GEN. YOSSI KUPERWASSER

Brigadier General Yossi Kuperwasser is the former deputy chief
of the intelligence branch of the Israeli military (AMAN) and former head
of its research department, which serves as the national assessor of intelligence.

The Israeli military's research department works closely with the Mossad
(foreign) and Shabak (internal) intelligence agencies. Currently he is
a Charles Bronfman fellow at the Haim Saban Center at the Brookings Institute.

Kuperwasser headed the research department for the Israeli military
from June 2001 until June 2006. He was responsible for strategic
intelligence and shaping the way that Israel understood regional developments.
Most importantly, Kuperwasser was responsible for how developments were
communicated to U.S. officials.

A brief sample of his work reveals how Kuperwasser has a history of
providing false or misleading information to U.S. officials:

In January 2002, Kuperwasser headed the Israeli delegation
that briefed the U.S. on its findings regarding an alleged Iranian-Palestinian
weapons deal involving a ship in the Red Sea. Large amounts of Iranian
weapons were supposedly bound for the Gaza Strip.

In April 2003, when no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq,
Kuperwasser suggested that they had all been moved to Syria. This
ridiculous idea was widely broadcast in the U.S. controlled media.

In November 2006, Kuperwasser told Canadian media that Iran would be
able to produce a nuclear weapon by March 2007. For good measure
he compared Iran with Nazi Germany.

In December 2006, Kuperwasser told Benny Avni of the New York Sun that
the Lebanese Shi'ite movement Hezbollah "tolerates some Al Qaida presence
in Lebanon and even cooperates with it." He went on to say that "everybody
in Lebanon" knows that Hezbollah is "operating on behalf of Iran."

MAJ. GEN. YISRAEL ZIV

Major General Yisrael Ziv has hands-on experience with terrorism.

Ziv, as commander of Israeli forces in Gaza, has a documented
record of planting bombs in civilian neighborhoods and blowing up apartment
houses.

In November 2001, the Jerusalem Post reported that Ziv had "been behind
the decision to lay the bomb" that killed five Palestinian schoolboys in
Khan Yunis in the occupied Gaza Strip. Israeli special forces under
Ziv's command had laid the bomb in a civilian area the night before.

The Jerusalem Post article is gone, but the unformatted
text is reproduced at the bottom of this page. Other articles about it
are still online, such as here
at oznik.com and here
at Haaretz.com

In October 2002, his forces fired a missile into a crowd on a dirt road
in Khan Yunis, killing at least 13 civilians. Ziv called it "a very
important operation that once again shows that there is no terror bastion
that is safe from our troops."

In September 2003, Ziv planned to kill Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, the paraplegic
spiritual leader of Hamas, by dropping a 1,100 lb. bomb on a three-story
building in Gaza. Rather than arrest the sheikh, Ziv decided to bomb
the building he lived in. This attempt failed to kill Yassin.

On March 22, 2004, Israel fired three Hellfire missiles at the sheikh
in his wheelchair, after he exited a mosque from his morning prayers.

The missiles killed Yassin, his bodyguards, and 8 innocent bystanders.

Ziv was also involved in scores of similar bombings and targeted extra-judicial
killings in which hundreds of innocent Palestinian civilians were killed.
When it comes to terrorism, Ziv certainly has experience.

FUTURE OF TERRORISM REPORT

The "future of terrorism" report to Secretary Michael Chertoff, an Israeli-American,
begins, as one might expect, with a full-color page of the U.S. flag.
The 13-page report, which took 5 months to produce, has three main objectives:
to "assess future threats"; to "fine-tune processes to meet those threats";
and to "recommend how to better engage and prepare the American public
for present and future challenges."

The 21-member task force, headed by Lee Hamilton, includes Elliott Broidy,
the wealthy Zionist billionaire from Los Angeles. James Schlesinger
of the MITRE Corp., the vice chair of the Homeland Security Advisory Council,
is also on task force.

Elliot Broidy held a fundraiser for Republicans at his house
in California in Oct 2006, and President
Bush attended!

He also held a private dinner party for the American Ballet Theatre
at his home. Click here
to see photos of America's adorable "socialites".

James Schlesinger, born in 1929, got into US government in 1969
during the Nixon administration.

He spent time as CIA director, Secretary of Defense, and Secretary of
Energy.

President Carter eventually got rid of him in 1979, and now he helps
companies with ties to Zionism.

Schlesinger's MITRE technology is linked to the events of 9/11 in a
number of significant ways.

"Based upon our work over the past five months," the report began, "members
believe that there is every indication that the number and magnitude of
attacks on the United States, its interests and its allies will likely
increase. Like crime or disease, terrorism should be conceived as a chronic
problem requiring a sustained and patient strategy, with ever evolving
tactics."

While "it was not within the purview of the task force to undertake
an exhaustive and in-depth examination of particular threats and the sources
from which they emanate," the report goes on to say that "the most significant
terrorist threat to the homeland today stems from a global movement, underpinned
by a jihadist/Salafist ideology," which seeks to "overturn regimes considered
to be apostate."

Why any home-grown Middle Eastern movement seeking to overthrow "apostate"
regimes in the Middle East would attack the American "homeland" thousands
of miles from the regimes they are supposedly fighting is not explained.
Most Americans don't even know what is meant by a "jihadist/Salafist ideology."

"Have the marketing people try the phrases Islamo-Fascist, Muslo-Nazi,
and Jihado-Terrorist"

A CENTRALIZED POLICE FORCE

The report promotes the centralization of the local police departments
under the Dept. of Homeland Security. In order to defend the "homeland"
the report calls for creating a national police force that coordinates
state and local forces with DHS:

Although progress has been made in moving towards a goal of
a seamless coordination capability between federal, state and local authorities
to ensure homeland security, there are still gaps in this coordination
that must be closed.

The Task Force was encouraged by the Director of Intelligence’s initiative
to staff state fusion centers with DHS analysts. This program will prove
to be valuable not only in information sharing, but educating state and
local agencies on what they should be looking for and reporting.

The report calls for DHS Secretary [Michael Chertoff] to "work directly
with state, local, private sector and community leaders to educate them
on the threat of radicalization, the necessity of taking preventative action
at the local level, and to facilitate the sharing of other nations’ and
communities’ best practices.

"As part of these community-based efforts aimed at mutual understanding
and elimination of conditions that allow extremist ideologies to take root,
the Secretary should assume the role of "catalyst" in order to incentivize
state and local authorities to proactively address the potential for radicalization
before home-grown terrorism evolves.

Specifically, the Secretary should actively work directly with Mayors,
Governors, and community [law enforcement] leaders to educate them on the
threat of radicalization, and to share best practices information from
communities and other nations that have aggressively engaged this threat."

Israel is clearly the first among the "other nations that have aggressively
engaged this threat."

Sharing information with the DHS is "a priority" in the centralized
police state. Local authorities will be denied "federal resources"
if they refuse to share information with DHS:

State and local capability to gather, process and share information
within local regions and with the federal government must remain a priority,
and should be developed through an operational partnership with the federal
government, ensuring that training, analytical capability, and resources
are consistent and meet the overall national need.

The Secretary should continue efforts with state and local authorities
to build regional operating capabilities and plans for prevention, protection
and response by requiring DHS components to develop their plans and capabilities
in concert with state and local authorities.

DHS should also make federal resources to state and local authorities
contingent upon regional collaboration.

Americans will be forced to learn more about and prepare for terrorism:

It is critical that the American public become engaged in understanding
and preparing for terrorism. Over the next five years, the public must
learn about the choices faced by the nation, communities, families, and
individuals. It must become a partner with its government, sharing the
burden.

Even children and students in school will be taught about responses to
terrorism and extremist threats to the "homeland":

In collaboration with the Department of Education and state
and local partners, consideration should be given to implementing developmentally
appropriate education at the elementary school, high school and college/university
levels.

In order to bring this agenda into practice at a national security level,
the report calls for Secretary Chertoff to be named to the National Security
Council:

We therefore recommend that consideration be given to fully
integrating the domestic security perspective in the work of the NSC by
naming the Secretary of Homeland Security to the NSC.

Note: we are not sure what happens if you donate money
or order books from Bollyn! He was providing his articles for free
and depending on sales of his ABC book for children, and
on donations. His charming ABC book is here.

Please pass links to his articles,
and try to find more people to join us in our struggle to expose corruption.
Don't let "them" get all of us! Show some concern!

This is the text from the Jerusalem Post newsarticle about IDF booby-trap
bombs

IDF forces laid the bomb that accidentally killed five Palestinian schoolboys
in Khan Yunis on Thursday, the army announced last night.

The IDF had remained silent over the cause of Thursday's deadly explosion
except to say no tank had fired a shell in that sector. OC Gaza Strip Brig.-Gen.
Yisrael Ziv is participating in the inquiry, but he himself may have been
behind the decision to lay the bomb.

It was the first public announcement by the IDF since the deaths of
Muhammad al-Astal, 14, his brother Akram, six, and their cousins Omer,
14, Annis, 10, and Ahmed, 10. The five children were walking to the nearby
UN elementary school on Thursday morning when one of them apparently kicked
the device, triggering the explosion.

The five were buried in Khan Yunis on Friday in a funeral attended by
more than 10,000 people.

The bodies, wrapped in Palestinian flags and strapped to stretchers,
were carried side-by-side in a procession as gunmen fired in the air. Children
carried pictures of their dead classmates. Masked men wrote slogans on
the walls of a mosque, threatening Israel with revenge.

Idress al-Astal, father of two of the dead children, said no investigation
could bring back his sons. "God will grant me revenge," he said, breaking
down in tears.

Military sources said that an IDF special force, acting on instructions
from senior commanders, slipped into area A and laid the bomb. The idea
was to set a trap in an area from which Palestinian gunmen had been repeatedly
attacking Jewish settlements and IDF outposts.

It was a classic anti-guerrilla tactic, but it failed to take into account
the possibility that others - such as children on their way to school -
would venture into the area with tragic results.

"From the moment of the explosion an operational inquiry started examining
the incident," an IDF statement said. "From an initial inquiry by OC Southern
Command Maj.- Gen. Doron Almog, the possibility arises that the children
were killed as a result of playing with a bomb which an IDF force had set
in a sandbagged position that had been used to shoot at and attack our
forces." It noted that the position was not inside any urban area, but
in an open field.

"The inquiry is not yet completed, and when it is all the necessary
operational lessons will be drawn," the statement said.

"The IDF Spokesman stresses that the action in the open area was intended
against terrorists and it expresses its regret for the death of the children,"
the statement said.

Both Defense Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer and the IDF issued official
statements expressing regret for the boys' deaths.

While Ben-Eliezer was sorry for the "human tragedy that took the lives
of innocents," he stopped short of taking actual responsibility for the
explosive device. The defense minister said the explosion was being investigated.

Israel Radio quoted a high-ranking officer as saying the order to investigate
the affair was a "grave mistake."

Meanwhile, the Palestinian Police chief in Gaza, Brig. Gen. Abdel Razek
Majaida, said the boys appeared to have been killed by a bomb planted by
Israeli forces, who had been seen operating in the area the night before
the blast.

"Shrapnel we collected from the area shows that the explosion was caused
by an explosive device," he said.

"Our investigation continues, but it looks as if the device was booby-trapped
and when one of the children kicked it, it exploded."

"We urge an international investigative committee to look into the murder
of innocent children and to determine Israel's responsibility," he added.

On Friday Transportation Minister Ephraim Sneh called on the army to
launch a proper and fair inquiry of the incident, declaring the army's
integrity is at stake.

"Someone may have to be punished if he acted improperly or acted with
negligence," Sneh told Israel Radio, but added that the context of the
tragedy is that "there is a terrorism and guerrilla war being waged against
Israel."

Opposition leader Yossi Sarid called on the army to carry out an investigation
and submit its findings this week to determine what was the cause and if
action needs to be taken if misconduct is found. Speaking on Channel 1,
he said: "Someone high up in the army will have to pay with his head. Children
killed, whether on our side or theirs, is not something to be ignored."

Minister without Portfolio Dan Meridor took a similar view.

"If we really made a mistake, I hope we'll tell the truth about it,"
he said. "The truth is better than any excuse."

US State Department spokesman Philip Reeker said of the incident: "The
United States deeply regrets the tragic accidental deaths of five Palestinian
children... when they came in contact with unexploded ordnance. It was
a terrible tragedy."

"We understand that the Israeli army has begun an investigation into
the circumstances of these deaths and we expect that investigation will
thoroughly determine what happened. This incident... is a strong reminder
of why both sides should do all they can to end the violence, reduce tensions,
and resume negotiations," he added.