Truth in a world of Lies and stupidity

I have discussions with people both online and in real life about current affairs, politics, activism, and more. Many people are passionate about what they are discussing and as such, I really don’t mind when the discussion or debate gets heated. If both people understand that the discussion or debate is just that, then you can have a heated debate without taking it personally.

However, many people out there are unable to cope with this idea and do take things personally. And those people tend to be the worst. Especially some of the commentators on social media sites. Instead of saying something constructive or conducive to the debate or discussion at hand, they of course, resort to name calling or attacking someone for stating something they have every right to state. And instead of being civilized they become these lunatics with an axe to grind.

After decades of being active online, I can spot these people very easily. They try to come off as some sort of moral authority on their opinion and attack someone by using slurs that sound racist and bigoted. Then when you confront them they invariably turn their ire on you when you defend yourself or a friend from them. When that doesn’t work and their argument falls apart they then try to slander you to try to get you to move away from the topic at hand in hopes that you will defend yourself from their offensive and then finally claim victim status saying you are the aggressor while they are the poor victim.

This happens almost daily online with people. They think that being offended by something they see online gives them the automatic moral right to attack people, and when they are defended against, they pretend to be victims of abuse online. There are many people out there who do this. I see many feminists, SJWs and liberals who do this.

New Disorder….??

This is what I call the Infantile Victim Disorder or IVD. You get an IVD when you have a warped set of beliefs that cause you to believe there is a mysterious patriarchy made up of old white men out to get you. Or that you think you are superior to the other person due to their body parts. And even due to a skin tone that is not considered Caucasian.

Symptoms include, being “triggered“. Using the word Problematic, and telling men they have male privilege or the other variant if you are a person of another color, having white male privilege.

Other symptoms may include: Obesity, Poverty, Neon color in hair, getting undressed in public to march against rape, yelling and spitting on men at university, submitting false rape claims, false reports of sexual assault. Raping men. Being the aggressor in domestic violence. Lesbianism.

If you suspect you have IVD, please go see a psychiatrist immediately. Usually sufferers of IVD also have Bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder and project their issues and blame others for problems that don’t exist or are the cause of the sufferer’s own actions.

To many people, they believe that gender fluid means that you can change your gender, like you can change your underwear. The reality (truth) is that you can’t. Gender is the description word we use to describe the sex of a person via pronouns. “He” is the gender pronoun for a male. “She” is the gender pronoun for a female.

The gender fluid idea not only dictates that you change your gender like you change your underwear, but that there must be a new gender pronouns created to describe these people.

Gender neutral pronouns have been created so people won’t offend their special snowflake friends.

Here is an example of made up, and in some cases unpronounceable pronouns:

More of the garbage can be found here: http://uwm.edu/lgbtrc/support/gender-pronouns/

The problem with all this is simply the fact that people actually think, that changing your gender is the simply act of a way of thought or clothing. The act of putting on a dress for a guy or bandaging up the breasts for a woman and putting on the opposite gender’s clothing means that they are the opposite sex. It is not. This is typically known as cross-dressing.

I’ve heard the idea from the idiots who believe this nonsense that gender is based on your personality, and not your anatomy. This is also untrue, since your anatomy dictates if your male or female. Hence, why people say “Penis = Male” and “Vagina = Female”.

There are mentally ill people who think they are puppy dogs to and want to live out their lives as dogs or even other animals or even mythical creatures.

That brings me to trans-gendered people. These people fall into the same category as the above.

These people suffer from a mental illness called “Gender Dysphoria”

These are people who are unhappy with their biological sex and believe they are the opposite sex. That somehow, the doctor when they were born, didn’t recognize the proper gender and “assigned” them the wrong one.

Decades ago this was treated, successfully I might add, as a mental illness. The treatment used to entail regular visits to a psychiatrist and medication. It was believed that people who suffered from this illness had a chemical imbalance. Then came the gay rights movement and feminism. They cited that it was NOT a mental illness that gender is a social construct. They convinced enough people, to re-examine the idea of the treatments, saying they are more harmful than helpful because it ignores the person’s feelings. Remember folks, feeling over fact and science is precedence with these people.

Then doctors created the mutilation surgeries that are still to this day, really bad. They allow people to voluntarily mutilate their bodies via cosmetic surgery in an effort to look like the opposite sex, while not being able to be biologically the opposite sex.

Let me explain.

You cannot change your DNA. You cannot change your muscle structure. You cannot change your skeletal structure. So your body regardless of the surgery will still show up as your sex that you were born as. This makes all those transgender surgeries under the category of cosmetic.

The worse part of it is that they are chopping off working body parts, and sewing on body parts that do not work as intended. For example, a male undergoing a male to female surgery, will not have a working uterus, and no eggs. So after the surgery she cannot bear children. A female to male is worse. In many cases the female decides to KEEP her uterus and have a penis sewn on. Only the penis cannot produce sperm and needs a rod or a pump installed to inflate it to be able to have sex. So technically it doesn’t work as functioning male either. In many of the cases of the women who go through those surgeries and keep their uterus, they decide at some point to have a baby.

Transgender means that you are transitioning from one gender to another. It doesn’t mean you can stay in that middle state and call yourself a man if you have a uterus.
Then the argument comes in that “Oh but the surgeries are expensive”. Yes, well cosmetic surgeries usually are, because they do not add any value to health. And are why they call them cosmetic.

And these people still are not happy after they go through with the surgeries. In fact many regret doing it. So much that they commit suicide in the same high numbers as they do before the surgeries.

When you fight your own biology, you will lose. You can’t change your gender. It is scientifically an impossibility. Feminist theory professors have an agenda. Indoctrination into the cult of feminism. They need to convince young minds that their theories are facts and due to the borg collective mentally of feminism, many just believe this without question.

The Black Lives Matter movement is a racist hate group and they are getting an award for it. Yes you read that correctly. The city of Toronto is planning on giving Black Lives Matter Toronto branch an award for “improving” race relations.

This is what Liberal Progressives think is progressive. By rewarding special interest groups if they scream and cry loud enough. Much like a child throwing a tantrum and a parent gives in to keep them quiet. So far, Toronto has been quiet, and has given in to their demands, much like anyone that the BLM group has gone to. Including the most recent Pride Toronto.

The Pride Toronto disruption to the parade was an insult to all gay people. The leaders in this branch were given the honor of leading the gay pride parade. What did they do with that honor? They spit in the face of gay people by disrupting the parade for 30 minutes and making idiotic demands which in this day an age sound like things they would have demanded in the era of the civil rights movement in the United States. However, what these people fail to recognize is that, as the liberals and progressives like to say, “It’s 2016”. Canada has never treated black people the way they got treated by our neighbors down south. Canada has always been against slavery for example. We helped free slaves by helping with the underground railroad and brought many of the former slaves here to live free. We have had equal rights for decades, yet this group seems to think it’s the 40s USA where police beat down the black man and it’s all the white man’s fault.

What makes me angry about this whole thing is the way the city of Toronto city hall and other groups like the Pride Committee just give in to this group. Why do they do this? For fear of being called racist and non-inclusive themselves. Their liberal white guilt and feminist ideology is to blame here. It’s become so bad to speak out against real injustice and more ideal to gain the approval of their peers that they perform virtue signaling to the other liberals to show them how progressive and inclusive they are by going out of their way to make groups like the BLM happy, without truly thinking about the repercussions and examining what the BLM says. One look at their facebook group page shows exactly their racist thinking and the divisiveness they promote among the races.

Remember BLM leader and her famous tweets about killing white people and men? This is their leader and she promotes racism and sexism, and barely anyone called her out. These people need to be shunned when they appear. Treat them with the same respect you would to a neo nazi or white supremacist and then we can work on equality.

So Toronto, will you continue to pander to these children who have never faced real adversity in their lives or will you learn from your mistakes and face reality and stop awarding racist bigots for their work on dividing people instead of uniting people?

I wasn’t going to write about Gun Control because that debate has been and still is being beaten to death with lies and half truths being flung around. Also with blame on the Orlando shooting being flung in many directions.

My perspective comes a as gay man who grew up in an era of hate against gays. I was there in the 80s and 90s fighting for our rights while gay men were thrown off bridges, killed, beaten and raped while the police did nothing and turned a blind eye. So with this perspective I can see all the views and how all of them are wrong and right.

The answer in all this is you cannot point to any one problem that caused this, but a bunch of problems that culminated into a massacre.

Let us look at the shooter himself. This is the big factor here. He was raised in a highly religious house with an overbearing and strict father who publicly has stated gays should be killed. They should die etc. Hard enough to live and grow up in a home with that being straight, but now throw in a guy who, turns out to be gay himself. He tried pretending and it didn’t work. He was unhappy and that unhappiness and upbringing told him he could be violent to women. So he turned to the people that he felt he had something in common with. Gay people. He dated them, slept with them, hung out at gay bars with them for years. That was his sanctuary, as it is for other gay men and lesbian women.

Then we look at the ideology of Islam. Here is a quote from their Quran.

“Kill the one that is doing it and also kill the one that it is being done to.” (in reference to the active and passive partners in gay sexual intercourse).

Or“We also sent Lut : He said to his people : “Do ye commit lewdness such as no people in creation (ever) committed before you? For ye practice your lusts on men in preference to women: ye are indeed a people transgressing beyond bounds.” Qur’an 7:80-81

There are many more example and interpretations of this religion that I could cite page after page of quotes against us, but I won’t. Here is a link though to one site that specifically talks about Islam and homosexuality…

So now, if you put yourself in the shooters shoes you get an idea of the self hatred and guilt he was feeling. Then you take in the fact they openly preach we should die in their mosques right here in North America and you get a problem.

Add in the background checks performed by the FBI and they purposely chose to allow this mentally disturbed individual to own a gun and you get what happened in Orlando.

Now here is the argument that many liberals in the United States and Canada are using.

Ban Guns. Guns kill people. We will be safer.

I have a huge issue with this. The issue is this assumes we will be safer without proof. They will cite that there is less gun violence in Canada. Oh wait… percentage wise no there isn’t. They can’t do math. You see Canada is smaller population wise. We have 10% of the population the USA has. That means we have a 10th of the number of the crimes that the USA has. And the stats actually back this up. We have had our share of mass shootings and killings.

Then we hear the arguments that we shouldn’t blame all Muslims. And I agree with this. However, what they fail to understand is that just because you don’t want radical Muslims to own guns or be allowed into the country, that you are somehow Islamophobic for wanting to stop these radicals from owning weapons or being allowed into a country.

They also like to ignore what is happening in other places in the world with the “It hasn’t happened, or can’t happen” here mentality. Germany, Sweden, Australia and other westernized countries have a serious problem of Muslim rape gangs. According to their religion it is okay to rape non Muslim women or women who are not married and protected by men. In fact many Muslim men who have been questioned on this respond that they had no idea that what they did was against the law or bad. In their faith, it is perfectly acceptable.

So the religion itself is pretty bad against gays and women and the liberals want to embrace this religion because “not all muslims”. I really don’t care about the peaceful Muslim people. The ones who live their lives beside me in peace. My doctor is a Muslim woman and I’m a gay white man. The problem I have is with the ones who follow that faith to the letter and want to kill me.

This comes to my other point. We have a right to protect ourselves from anyone attacking us. Liberals don’t think so. They think that the only people that should be allowed to protect us is the government. However, intelligent people understand that police don’t always show up on time, if they are even called. Was the police called in the Orlando Shooting? Yes. Did they show up in time to stop the guy from killing 50 people and injuring another 50? The answer is no. It takes seconds to stop a mass shooting as this video shows:

There are many other cases of this on YouTube. You never hear about this because the Liberals would rather you not hear both sides of the argument. They just want you helpless and dependent on others for your safety.

If one or two people at that Nightclub had been armed, the death toll would have been much smaller.

No population has ever been safe from being disarmed. In those countries that have been, the rates of violent crimes have risen dramatically. Including murder and rape. If you know for a fact you won’t be shot by someone then your chance of survival from committing a horrible act goes up and therefor they have no fear in doing those crimes. This brings me to…

Gun Free Zones argument…

They don’t work. They just don’t. In many of the mass shootings they were in Gun Free Zones like Sandy Hook etc. If a person doesn’t care about killing you, then why would you honestly think a sign that says “gun free zone” would stop them? It is an invitation to them. They know that they have less if not no chance of someone shooting them back. Yet the argument these work is patently idiotic.

Love beats Hate argument….

This one doesn’t work either. We have tried that for all my life in Canada and there are still terrorists trying to kill us, people shooting people, and killing people. What does work is defending oneself from an attacker.

Love doesn’t stop a bullet.

With so many people out there that want to kill me because of who I love in my life that honestly does cause fear for my safety and those around me. My husband and I grew up in the era of constant threat of violence and while that threat went down dramatically over the decades I admit, I am still hated by many and as the Orlando shooting and Islam teaches Muslims, that we must be killed. I and any other sane gay person or even women shouldn’t feel safe with that kind of threat hanging over our heads.

“Only a small number of Muslims” argument….

Do the math. There is 1.6 Billion Muslims on the planet all over the world. That is a huge portion of the planets population. In Canada it 35% of the Muslim population agrees with the terrorists. With 1,053,945 Muslims in Canada, and if 35% agree with the terrorists .. that means over 300, 112 Muslims want me dead. And that is in my own country.

A newly released survey suggests a large number of Muslims living in Canada will not disown Al-Qaida.The study,[34] conducted by the MacDonald Laurier Institute, found 65% of Muslims questioned said they would “repudiate absolutely” the terrorist organization, while 35% would not do so.

“From a security perspective, it is difficult to know if a 65% rate of repudiation (of Al-Qaida) is re-assuring or a 35% failure to repudiate troubling,” wrote study authors Christian Leuprecht, associate professor of the Royal Military College of Canada and Conrad Winn, Carleton University professor and president of COMPAS, a public opinion research firm.
. . .

The report also states support for extremism is just as high among Muslims born in Canada, or other Western countries, as it is among those hailing from oppressive dictatorships.

So in closing, you have to decide for yourself if you need to arm yourself and protect yourself. If you prefer to live in a world where you expect everyone else to protect you then that is your choice. I know from experience and from reading history and seeing the bodies pile up on the news that this is not the case and we as gay people are targets. We need to protect ourselves. You can’t hug away terrorism or terrorist acts.

To Justin Trudeau, his Cabinet, and the current sitting members of Parliament,

I am going to step away from the main virtue that Canadian people are known for, and that is being nice. I’m angry. I am angry at you. All of you. You failed. You failed in your duty. The main one to which all people believe in, when it comes to a democratic nation.

The duty of protecting it’s people. You failed. You failed in helping our Canadian citizens John Ridsdel and Robert Hall.

While our Prime Minister was busy with PR stunts and photo opportunities, these men, our own citizens had their lives cut short by people who have no respect for freedom, democracies, religions or life. They pleaded from their government to intervene in some way. You stood by and did nothing. They asked you in the very real terror to do your duty to protect them, and you were silent.

“To the Canadian government, I’m told to tell you to meet the demand,” Hall said in the video. “I don’t know what you’re doing but, you’re not doing anything for us. John is being sacrificed, his family has been decimated, and I’m not sure why or what you’re waiting for.”

Then afterwards, Justin you went on camera and gave a speech, which amounted to nothing. It meant nothing. You did nothing to prevent this tragedy, nothing to protect our citizens, our brothers. You had the power, the authority but you stood by and did nothing.

You took a policy of standing by and doing nothing after decades of terrorism and threats to free people of the world. Instead you sit back and kill the people you have a duty to protect and wring your hands and give your condolences to the families of the dead who have to live with the loss and the knowledge of the horrible ways these victims died.

It’s time you, and I mean a all of you stand up and do your duty to the people of canada and do something to stop these terrorists from doing this again to any Canadian. It’s time you did your duty. If you cannot, or will not, protect our people when these types of things happen then all of you need to step down from your positions and let real men and women, who have the courage to stand up against terrorists who kidnap and kill our people.

Instead of spending your time in front of the press, flashing love signs and promoting feminism and spending billions each month, do your job.

The policy of not paying ransoms has failed. It can be proven with the evidence of the bodies of these men, and every single man, woman and child this has happened to over the past 20 years.

If a police officer stands by, and does nothing and remains silent, while he watches a citizen be killed by another he can be considered an accessory to the crime of murder. You, the cabinet and the members of parliament are guilty of being accessories to acts terrorism.

We all have rights. Many of those rights are violated today under the guise of “for your safety” or for “public safety”. Like the era of Hitler when he came into power, pro police and pro authority supporters encourage this. They praise police when they very obviously have broken the law or violated someone’s individual human rights.
Today I read a very vague article in my local newspaper, that lead me to believe the person mentioned in it had her rights violated. Which of course prompted a heated debate as I seemed to be the only one who recognized this.

Now, after reading the article it does not say why she was in the hospital or why she was angry. So we can only speculate. I am someone who presumes innocence until proven guilty, so I will presume she is innocent of any crime.

Which leaves only a few reasons for her to act this way. The most logical and basic is that she was forced there against her will, got angry and spit on the cop. Who then proceeded to charge her for getting a little wet.

The comment section heated on social media when I mentioned that her rights had most likely been violated by the cops, the medical professions and possibly the paramedics if they used them.

This caused a stir. People stood up and commented that the cops was assaulted, but really were they?

If you are taken against your will to someplace you didn’t want to go, just because you were drunk, isn’t that kidnapping? I would think so. In fact the Legal definition of kidnapping is:

Kidnapping

Thecrime of unlawfullyseizingandcarryingaway a person by force orFraud, or seizinganddetaining a personagainsthis or herwillwith an intent to carrythatpersonaway at a latertime.

This is what they did. That is again assuming that she didn’t want to go and didn’t commit any crimes while drunk.

Many would say that it was for her safety and that makes it right. Actually no it doesn’t. The only person who can make that decision is the person in question. The only time that doesn’t apply is when they are unable to due to mental illness or they are unconscious.

In the 90s, I lived in BC and at that time there was a serious heroin problem. 100% pure heroin was being sold on the streets and anyone who would inject themselves with it would overdose and die within 3o minutes. This was such a major problem that they had paramedics driving ambulances in the alleys and looking for unconscious drug addicts.

When they found a conscious drug user, they would offer help, and if they person said no they legally could not do anything. If that happened they would wait until that person lost consciousness and then act.

When I asked the authorities about that, they said that by law they cannot force a medical treatment against someone’s will unless they were unable to make that decision themselves. That is to me the right thing to do.

Now back to the woman in the article, if she was drunk and they transported her to the hospital and she refused medical treatment, then forcing her to have it would have made the medical staff at fault. And the police trying to “deescalate” the situation would not have made it any better. No means no. And since the police in this age are not known to be gentle or nice , we can only assume their idea of deescalate was to use force on her to hold her down. To which the only thing the woman could do to defend herself would be to spit on the cop.

Some paramedics piped up and stated they deal with drunk people all the time who don’t want help and have to “deal” with the violence all the time. Same with some nurses at the hospitals. Here is my message you to and to any of these people who think they are helping someone. “NO MEANS NO.” Drunk or sober, you do not have the right to force a medical treatment, force someone to go somewhere, without their consent or against their will. NEVER! If they attack you in anyway it is within their right to defend themselves because regardless of your intent, you are violating their rights and attacking them”.

Can people understand this? If a drunk driver is held accountable for their actions of getting in the vehicle and driving while drunk then they have the ability to say no to unwanted help. If you violate this and take them to a hospital and try to perform a medical procedure, any medical procedure then you are at fault and not the drunk person.

Pass this on and share this. The more people that get educated on rights, then maybe we can fix this from happening to others.

We are now seeing generations of people coming out of our education system, less educated, and less able to think critically than when they went in. As a result, we are seeing these same people deny the definition of words that are listed in dictionaries and going with their own. Case in point, is when you point out the dictionary definition of feminism to someone, and they say “well that’s YOUR definition. My definition is …..”.

This is the idiocy that I am speaking of. It has gotten so bad that these people cannot even think critically about what they are even saying, and follow the cult mentality of the ideology.

Here is a comparison of a religion, to feminism.

Religion have a god and a devil.

Feminism has well, Feminism and he evil Patriarchy.

Religion has the oppressed and the oppressors.

Feminism has the ever victims called Women and Men are oppressing them. Even male babies and men who die protecting them.

Religion has an ideology that has a list of sins.

Feminism has this too. Women are sinners if they support men who don’t follow feminism, who decide to be housewives, etc.

Men are born in sin. Are all potential rapists and aggressors.

Religion has a persecution complex.

So does feminism. Patriarchy keeps women down!

Religion has a Pope!

Feminism has Justin Trudeau! (Irony)

The comparisons can go on and on. The current feminist pope… I mean mouthpiece, recently proclaimed that Liberals should be considered a movement, and not a political party. He is blurring the lines purposely. He wants people to start thinking of the liberal party as a movement because this way it makes it easier for the feminist movement to control it more openly instead of via puppet strings.

We need to stop this and shout it down. Everywhere, and every-time we see it. We may not all agree on political topics, but identity politics should not be part of government. I can vividly see a future where men are forced to sit to pee and getting angry at a woman or speaking against a woman becomes a crime if these people continue and have their way.

Keep fighting for freedom people. Liberals/Feminism is not freedom, but a cage.

I’m so over the vaccine debate that to me it’s a done deal. I’m against it. Yet, daily I see posts from people who are for it and who are against it. The reasons from the pro side just don’t add up, nor do they make any sense.

The latest diatribe I heard from the pro vaccine side is trying to discount the inserts as something not to worry about, or that people don’t understand how to read them properly etc.

Notice the six pages, (yes six) of adverse reactions, which include but are not limited to death and other various lifelong medical problems.

Notice the part where it says it is NOT 100% effective 100% of the time? This means it doesn’t work.

Yet people still advocate for this poison and discount these warnings as nothing to be worried about, and at the same time make comments like “There is only a 15% chance of getting an adverse reaction, that means it’s still 85% safe”. (They obviously didn’t read the NOT 100% safe part.)

Another nail in the coffin I found just today, was a paper that cites a 120 years worth of history of diseases and vaccines and their effects written by a doctor.

Now I read this and now know that there are many doctors and medical professionals who know this information. They know it is harmful. And in fact they discuss how the vaccinated population are at risk of death if even small pox breaks out. Not the people who decided not to vaccinate. They discuss it clearly and explain why this is.

This is something I’ve known for years, but yet people have seem to have just forgotten. Our immune systems are made so we can get sick and develop natural antibodies. The vaccines don’t do this. They never did.

Silly people cite that these diseases were wiped out by vaccines, but the truth is they weren’t. They disappeared due to better hygiene, better sanitation and better food preparation. Diseases come and go as well throughout history. Some diseases have even been found in arctic ice samples. (Think of the arctic ice melting now, scary huh). The common denominator in diseases in hygiene, sanitation and food safety. Your less likely to get sick if all three of those conditions are good. Not any vaccine.

When these vaccines were introduced, the diseases were almost gone, not by any drugs but by better standards of living.

Now we have occasional outbreaks of measles, mumps etc. And they have always been traced back to vaccinated people. Always. The media doesn’t report that very loudly though. They don’t want to loose all that advertising revenue from the drug companies, but that still doesn’t change the fact that vaccinated people are more at risk from a disease than those that have not been vaccinated.

Our bodies get a disease by breathing in or eating some microbe or virus via mouth, nose or stomach. It has to then get to our blood stream but it first gets analyzed by our immune system and antibodies keyed to our body are created and when the virus hits our bloodstream, our immune response already has started to respond and attack it. Then when the virus has been eradicated from our body the specific antibody’s dna or structure is stored in our dna so when or if we get infected again, our body can easily and quickly create new antibodies to attack the virus.

A vaccine does not do this. The vaccine is injected into us bypassing the normal natural ways we contract a disease. As well, depending on the vaccine, some vaccines have dead virus’ in them. So the antibodies that are created from that dead virus have certain problems. The first being that the antibodies are being created to combat something that is already dead. The other issue the antibodies in the virus are not keyed to your body. They weren’t created by your body so when they are cloned by your body they really aren’t beneficial to your body. Imagine a clone of someone else. Then cloning that clone a few million times, and then take an organ from the final clone like the liver and transplanting it in you. The chances the organ won’t do anything are pretty high and most likely your health will be compromised.

This is what a vaccine is. Or does. It leaves you compromised health wise. It offers a false sense of protection from disease. Which is better a lifelong immunity or something that is temporary, can possibly harm you for life and even kill you if you get sick.

The problem with ideology like this is the fact it is based on the idea that White man oppressor Everyone else good victim.

The writer also runs under the feminist ideology. This ideology is based on the idea that if you don’t have any self doubt or don’t think that the reason you didn’t get a job due to your skin color is a privilege. The writer, like most feminists believe white people, or rather white men, don’t have self doubt about getting jobs based on skin color, gender or even sexual orientation. Which of course is the problem, simply because we are all human beings and we all experience self doubt about things, especially when they are not going our way.

The writer makes bold statements that white people are angry at being called racist for saying racist things or having racist beliefs. I myself have been accused of this by a few black people. Why? The reason I’m a so called racist by black people is purely retarded. It’s because I don’t date black people. That’s it. That so far has been the only reason. The writer of this article shows very clearly that they are racist in their thought processes. They constantly insinuate racial issues, and stereotypes etc.

Now while I don’t deny racism does exist, I don’t see it as the problem it was back in the 50’s. This person, like all who follow the feminist ideology of victim-hood believe they are victims somehow. Even when they are not.

The idea that not having any doubts about a job interview is called confidence. That isn’t a privilege. That is actually a trait of someone who is mentally stable and balanced. Even if you have doubt as to why you didn’t get the job, that just means you have doubt or self confidence issues. Which is actually normal for most people. Even I have experienced this, and I am a white guy. White males do experience self doubt. One job that I interviewed for a very long time ago, I didn’t get. I was told by the HR team I was qualified, but they had given to a female. That caused me to have self doubt, did I not get the job because of my gender?

The writer also states “I had had enough. I kept thinking “Why am I always moving out of this guy’s way?” Just about everyone else in the world seemed to agree that if two people were walking toward each other, both people would acquiesce a little…”

I don’t know what part of the world the person is from but if two people are walking towards each other one person always moves out of the way. Sometimes both. Not always though. Why he thinks that being nice and moving out of the other person’s way is a bad thing is part of a larger issue.

I understand that being nice all the time has it’s limits and sometimes you just want to say fuck it and push your way through. But that doesn’t mean you were privileged if someone else moves out of the way. That just means you are a courteous person. That is it.

Privilege boils down to this:

Privilege is something that can be given to you and can be taken away. For example, a privilege , like your laptop you received from daddy at Christmas. If you do something wrong daddy can take that laptop away from you as punishment. Removing the privilege. In other words, privilege comes from outside of yourself, is something that can be taken away by others.

Thinking that you might have not gotten a job is not privilege in any way shape or form. It just isn’t. That is self confidence issues stemming from your own conscious or unconscious desires and not getting those desires fulfilled.

Moral is, if you have a doubt as to why something did not happen or why it happened, don’t go blaming others for your confidence issues. Think to yourself what YOU could have done to have been offered the job or gotten the better shifts. And maybe, just maybe the other person they hired or gave those shifts to were actually better than you.

After all, you can think you are better all you want, but the reality is the only person who is qualified to know is the owner or manager of the job. They are the ones who hire you or do the scheduling and know exactly what kind of performance they need. Not You.

What happens when your home is no longer your castle? What does it feel like when you, get told that you have no rights on who enters your home or when?

I found out today that in Canada, we do not have any rights to our property. At least the government believes we don’t. In the interest of safety, they have created laws that empower their agents to think they can tell us that they can, without any warrant, to enter our homes.

Now the reason may sound reasonable to some, but the reason does not matter to me. It is the rights they trample over.

Today during a neighborhood association meeting, we had a representative from the fire department. She was quite nice and I had a great respect for that branch. Until today that is. She had been there to represent the local fire department and with a smile, informed us that the Carbon Monoxide detectors had almost been installed in all the homes in my area, except for a few. She then proceeded to inform us that in those homes that they were unable to gain access to, they would ticket the homeowners and basically enter the home, without a warrant to install these Carbon Monoxide detectors/inspect the home.

Of course being who I am, this raised huge red flags to me. Our homes are supposed to be our sanctuaries and no one, should be allowed to enter except in emergency or with a warrant if suspected of a crime.

According to the fire department however, they can and will enter people’s homes if the home owners refuse them entry when they come knocking for the carbon monoxide detectors.

The legal implications for this is huge. The first implication is that you have no say on who enters the home if they are a government agent. The police are supposed to get a warrant to enter someone’s home, but the fire department doesn’t if there is no apparent emergency?

If the fire department can be granted these powers, with no due process, then what else has the Canadian governments created?

Needless to say this made me instantly angry. Here was a government representative, telling us homeowners that we had no say. No authority. Well needless to say that I promptly informed her that no law can decide who enters my home and If they tried I will fight them in court and defend my home from intrusion, because without a warrant, I consider anyone entering my home as a home invader. Uniform or not. She then tried to threaten me with getting a police officer to come in to “explain” the law to me.

This kind of heavy strong arm tactic is the same type that dictatorships use and if you don’t capitulate they throw you in jail or kill you. No cop can enter your home without your permission or a warrant, or unless there is some emergency like a 911 call from inside the home, fire, or break in.

They cannot, ever enter without a warrant. To do so, they would be violating your rights to privacy and your home. Think of all those people who have been victims of a home invasion and imagine the home invaders being the government. The feelings you would feel would be no different. Many people who have experienced this from cops or any government agency have described their feelings after as the same as those who have had a home invasion by criminals. No difference.

Now, someone at the meeting cited that police can enter with just cause, and the answer is a swift no they can’t. They need to get a warrant to enter. If they have “just cause” then they can bring that to a judge, while just cause is not usually enough to get an arrest warrant, it can be enough to justify a warrant to enter someone’s home, but to give any other agencies sweeping powers to enter your home with any due process is a violation of a person’s rights.

We need to stop letting these people get away with this. We need to stop being so passive when it comes to government and law enforcement.

Maybe they are misunderstanding the law? Maybe they have been told by their superiors they can do this and let the lawyers handle any blowback? Who knows, but this is not what living in a free country means.