Since the I18N WG endorses this Change Proposal, and the editor also
agrees, I'd like to hear if anyone else would object to this as a
resolution to ISSUE-88. If no one objects, the Chairs will seek to
close this issue by amicable resolution. If there are objections, then
we will seek some other way to resolve this issue promptly, such as
using a survey.
Regards,
Maciej
On Apr 28, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Phillips, Addison wrote:
> On 9 April 2010, Ian Hickson proposed [1] a solution to Issue-88
> that said in part:
>
> --
> SUMMARY
> People are confused by the Content-Language pragma, so it should be
> made
> non-conforming.
> --
>
> The Internationalization Core WG has officially endorsed this
> proposed solution [2]. Existing, legacy documents (and non-browser
> processes that use this markup) will not be harmed by this solution
> while this will eliminate the confusing (and not useful) overlap in
> language declaration.
>
> (for I18N Core),
>
> Addison
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/0308.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2010/04/21-core-minutes.html#item04
>
> Addison Phillips
> Globalization Architect -- Lab126
> Chair -- W3C Internationalization WG
>
> Internationalization is not a feature.
> It is an architecture.
>
>