About Me

Blog Archive

Search This Blog

Tuesday, June 14, 2016

`A Man Cannot Make Himself Simple at All'

I’m
sorry, but as I read Henri Troyat’s Tolstoy
again after almost half a century I’m tempted to formulate a Theory of Human
Behavior. Here goes: Anyone advocating doctrinal simplicity as a way of life
probably has no gift for it, and is doomed to a life of vexation. And a
corollary: He’ll likely make life a living hell for those around him. Tolstoy
was forever carrying on about chastity, pacifism and vows of poverty, as only a
well-heeled aristocrat can. At precisely the moment he started preaching asceticism
and universal love, he stopped being a great novelist and story writer. Chekhov,
who honored him as a writer, had Tolstoy’s number: “Prudence and justice tell
me there is more love for mankind in electricity and steam, than in chastity
and vegetarianism.” One thinks of Thoreau (“simplify, simplify”) and his contempt
for his fellows. Stevie Smith had her say about the hypocrisy of simplicity
advocates in the 1964 essay “Simply Living” (Me Again: Uncollected Writings of Stevie Smith, 1982);

“You
must have some money if you are going to live simply. It need not be much, but
you must have some. Because living simply means saying No to a great many
things. How can you say No to travelling up and down to work and being
competitive if you do not have money? If you have a little money and are a
poet, there is no greater pleasure than living simply. It is also grand. In my
present circumstances I am grand. I can say No when I want to and Yes when I
want to. It is important to say Yes sometimes or you will turn into an Oblomov.
He stayed in bed all day and was robbed by his servants. There was little
enjoyment there.”

There
seems to be nothing simple about simplicity and what it does to people. In his
1902 essay “Tolstoy’s Cult of Simplicity,” G.K. Chesterton calls the Russian a “venomous
reformer,” and states an obvious paradoxical truth: “We feel that a man cannot
make himself simple merely by warring on complexity; we feel, indeed, in our
saner moments, that a man cannot make himself simple at all. A self-conscious
simplicity may well be far more intrinsically ornate than luxury itself.
Indeed, a great deal of the pomp and sumptuousness of the world’s history was
simple in the truest sense.”

[Today
is a sad one for readers. On this date, June 14, we lost Leopardi in 1837,
Chesterton in 1936 and Borges in 1986.]