4. “That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow.”

Posted Oct 06, 2013 - 21:13

mablibsking

Members

1 posts

Local time: 04:08 PM

Exams: May 2014

Hello guys! I'm a new person on the forum.

I need some help on the TOK Essay, as I'm kind of stuck.

I agree with this claim. Firstly, I'm going to explore the wording of the question. Sometimes: This implies of some knowledge claims are discarded, and some stay. This relates to the word discarded, as how discarded might not really mean discarded as we know it. It could be like evolution, as old theories are constantly being "evolved" by new theories, they are discarded. But we can say they're not discarded, but rather, the old theories simply were assimilated within the new theories and "evolved." This would correlate to the sometimes thing, as some are completely discarded, but some are simply assimilated into the new theories. Tomorrow might not really mean exactly tomorrow, but rather the near future. The word Accepted, imo implies that knowledge claims have to be approved by someone in order for them to be "correct" This someone can be Society, the Gov't, such and such.

I've chosen History and Natural Sciences for this topic. I've created examples for each of the topics, and they support the claim. For History I chose revisionist historians, and how the history we learn changes with time, as revisionist historians change things so as to fit the truths. Because history is always incomplete, so old theories are in fact assimilated into the new theories, and a "better" and more accurate truth of the world is created. In this case, the truths of history is not sometimes discarded, but rather always adapted and made better. In this case, its more like the theories created by earlier generations and accepted throughout the world can change easily.

For Natural sciences, there are plenty of these examples, but I chose Galileo and his discovery of the world. The Earth revolves around the Sun, and not Vice Versa. His theory were not accepted tomorrow, but "tomorrow," as it was in the near future that his theory was proclaimed to be true. And in this case, because of his theory, the idea of Earth being the centre was completely discarded, and not assimilated within the new theory. And also, the word accepted applies here, as his theory was condemned by other scientists, as well as the Pope. They did not accept his theory, and had "discarded" it. It goes to show that even theories (knowledge claims) that were not accepted can get discarded.

With Knower's perspective, we're required to give examples in relation to oneself. I plan to use certain knowledge claims I've learned, and claim that my life has changed drastically because of me coming to know that one thing and such.

However, the question explicitly asks for Knowledge Issues. So I'm kind of stumped as to what kind of KI I can bring in in accordance to the AoK and myself. What I have in mind is like:

What role do emotions(culture/religion) play in determining our future?

Posted Oct 07, 2013 - 01:32

~Lc~

goli 2o 3'ayri!

Administrator

1,626 posts

Local time: 02:08 AM

Exams: May 2007

I like the idea you have about discussing the wording, but instead of approaching it from the angle of what disregarded means, I would suggest you define the term how you want to represent it in your essay and go from there.

Otherwise, to use specific terminology about your argument in the first paragraph, what you are talking about is acceptance of knowledge as a result of conventional thought. "Convention" being the body which approves it.

Another thing which follows within these lines of argument are the relativity of truth, which you van visit through the WOK of language. Something along the lines of truth exists in the language we present it in, but that is relative to what we conventionally associate the"truth" in words etc.

In the paragraph of the natural sciences, you are discussing the falsification of scientific theory. I would also suggest including the scientific method as a tool of knowing in this AOK.

sounds like your on the right track overall though! I bet your essay will make for an interesting read

Posted Oct 24, 2013 - 11:26

Oscar Krumlinde

VIP Subscriber

1 posts

Local time: 01:08 AM

Exams: May 2014

I'm also a bit stuck on the knowledge issues... How many are we actually meant to mention? Is it better to only have 2-3 and discuss them over a broad range of WoK and AoK? Or are you discussing an k. issue for every new argument?

For the moment I'm trying to only focus on a few, I fear though that it will end up as a history essay.

Posted Oct 25, 2013 - 09:34

~Lc~

goli 2o 3'ayri!

Administrator

1,626 posts

Local time: 02:08 AM

Exams: May 2007

Best thing to do is look at the marking sheet. When I was in IB we had to compare at least 2.

To avoid turning it into a histoy essay, try thinking about the subject as a 3rd person rather than discussing the subject itself. So don't discuss historical facts but focus on how the facts are collected, presented, percieved etc.

Posted Oct 28, 2013 - 16:30

Erasmusrasmus

Members

67 posts

Local time: 12:08 AM

Exams: May 2014

Best thing to do is look at the marking sheet. When I was in IB we had to compare at least 2.

To avoid turning it into a histoy essay, try thinking about the subject as a 3rd person rather than discussing the subject itself. So don't discuss historical facts but focus on how the facts are collected, presented, percieved etc.

Wait what marking sheet Like the assessment criteria for the ToK essay or are there individual ones regarding each topic?

Posted Oct 28, 2013 - 16:51

under-cover

VIP

195 posts

Local time: 01:08 AM

Exams: May 2014

Best thing to do is look at the marking sheet. When I was in IB we had to compare at least 2.

To avoid turning it into a histoy essay, try thinking about the subject as a 3rd person rather than discussing the subject itself. So don't discuss historical facts but focus on how the facts are collected, presented, percieved etc.

Wait what marking sheet Like the assessment criteria for the ToK essay or are there individual ones regarding each topic?

Posted Nov 05, 2013 - 12:30

“That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow.” Consider knowledge issues raised by this statement in two areas of knowledge”

Will be my TOK topic, and I have chosen the natural sciences and history as my two areas of knowledge.

For the natural sciences, I will be talking about the development of medical knowledge, as far as surgical operations and the discoveries of new medical tools such as the iPSC and the extracellular matrix. I will be discussing how the development of medical discoveries shape the perception of the world, and how many medical knowledge have been "overwritten" with the new.

For History, I will be talking about the Korean Japanese Island Dispute, and will be discussing that historical information that have not been completely substantiated will cause tension between the two, and the perplexity in determining the truth will lead to serious consequences such as the difficulties of concording.

However, after I have generally explained about the example of the natural sciences, I am stuck on how to continue my essay; would anyone please give me an insight on this?

Posted Nov 22, 2013 - 01:16

but when i got my paper back, i got an extremely despicable grade, hope i can get it up.

is there anyone doing the same topic as me?

yeah, this has happened to me too, especially because it is so unclear what you have to write about exactly.

My advice (based on what I've done wrong in the past) is this:

Re-make a plan and write down as many (loads!) of arguments and counter arguments as you can, then look back through these and develop the ones that are of most importance, and obviously merge those that go together.

Then, when writing your essay, make good connections to the AoKs and WoKs, maybe read a sample essay if you can find one online?

And make sure your essay is clear and your argument, with good analysis, is apparent to the reader. ask someone else to have a look and give you tips?

Posted Dec 06, 2013 - 12:28

lupekudi

Members

12 posts

Local time: 08:08 AM

Exams: May 2014

hey i am doing the same topic too. my aok's are natural science and human science. i will insert more about islamic knowledge for human science and for natural science i will use about the shape of the planet.

Posted Dec 09, 2013 - 20:05

Connaitre

Members

18 posts

Local time: 01:08 AM

Exams: May 2014

hey i am doing the same topic too. my aok's are natural science and human science. i will insert more about islamic knowledge for human science and for natural science i will use about the shape of the planet.

My best advice to you would be to not include Islamic Knowledge. It's a lot harder to do a good essay with religious views as it's harder to find counter arguments. If you think you can manage though, great!

Posted Dec 10, 2013 - 06:55

gyf304

Members

4 posts

Local time: 08:08 AM

Exams: May 2014

I'm also a bit stuck on the knowledge issues... How many are we actually meant to mention? Is it better to only have 2-3 and discuss them over a broad range of WoK and AoK? Or are you discussing an k. issue for every new argument?

For the moment I'm trying to only focus on a few, I fear though that it will end up as a history essay.

Same thing over here. I don't actually know what the "knowledge issues" stand for - should I just stick to "That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow." or I should derive my own topic based on this?

Posted Dec 17, 2013 - 13:39

lupekudi

Members

12 posts

Local time: 08:08 AM

Exams: May 2014

maybe for the intro i will put the problem of used to the main road when finding a place by using a road. if we have know the shortcut to the place maybe we are no longer using the main road right? haha

Posted Dec 19, 2013 - 04:20

ashleigh7

Members

7 posts

Local time: 07:08 AM

Exams: May 2013

You could also try to think about how 'knowledge' can change and be discarded, because we are never sure about the complete validity of our theories and claims. For example, in the Natural Sciences - we have all these scientific laws and theories which are considered correct. Note that these theories are all based on interpreting patterns, and it is also in some more interpretation of patterns that these theories can be 'proven' and hence the validity also proven. However, we never really know if our theory is completely valid or not - since we cannot observe ALL phenomena in relation to it. For example, if person A saw only white swans in his neighbourhood, then his theory that "All swans are white" could be considered valid to him and the people around him, since there are no white swans around, but we know that this isn't the case - that although his theory isn't necessarily disproved in his area, it is somewhere else, with the existence of black swans. And, all that you need to discard this theory is just one occurrence of something that doesn't fit in with the pattern.

And for history: history can, and is oftentimes, recorded in such a way that the events are not portrayed exactly. For example, how do we know that the way the reporter of an event perceives the event doesn't alter the way he tells it? You can discuss about 'Ways of Knowing' here, particularly emotion and language. Emotion as a way of knowing can give us a biased view of circumstances, and these individuals will then use their bias and turn it into a report of events which has biased language. Thus, the 'history' being given to future generations is flawed and doesn't portray the real circumstances. Thus, sometimes improvements need to be made, and views considered acceptable can be discarded so that history can be improved.