Summary of Participants

All of the people in Group 3 are obviously closely related, and although we have gaps in some of the lineages,
all of the participants in Group 3, with the exception of A44, are descendants of Adrian Anglin, who died in
Buckingham County, Virginia, in 1777. The group includes:

7 participants who are descendants of Adrian but with gaps in their lineages (A3, A37, and A43; A7; A23; A35; A53);

1 descendant of a 20th-century immigrant from Ireland to the United States (A44).

A44 is our first member of Group 3 who is not descended from Adrian Anglin. A44's immigrant ancestor came to America from Ireland
in 1913, and thus it is A44 who gives Adrian's descendants their first Old World connection.

Summary of Findings

The William who died in (West) Virginia was Adrian's son, not the William who died in Caswell County, North Carolina;

Daniel Benjamin Anglin, born about 1806 in Georgia, was descended from Adrian, and not James, as some had believed;

The Philip Anglin who was born about 1810 and was married to Betsy Watkins was descended
from Adrian, and not the William who died in Caswell County, North Carolina, as some had believed;

Isaac, Adrian, Samuel, and John are confirmed as sons of Adrian's son William (A4, A7, A14, A18, A25, A27, A46, and A48);

The William born 1815-1820 in Kentucky is a descendant of Adrian's son William;

Adrian Anglin's line is closely related to Anglins who lived in Ireland in the early 1900's.

Gaps in Lineages

DNA tells us these lines are descendants of Adrian Anglin, but we don't know the exact connection. I hope to make a page for each line,
with everything we can find out about the earliest ancestor following the gap. With a concerted effort we may be able to close,
or at least narrow, some of these gaps. The earliest known ancestor after the gaps are:

Daniel Benjamin Anglin, born about 1806 in Georgia (A3, A37, and A43);

Joshua A. Anglin, born about 1812 in Williamson County, Tennessee, married Laurena (A35)

Philip Anglin, born about 1810 in South Carolina or Georgia and married to Betsy Watkins in Williamson County, Tennessee (A23);

William Anglin, born 1815-1820 in Kentucky, descendant from Adrian's son William (A27);

Mutations from the ancestral haplotype are shown in bold type.
Participants with no mutations indicated have the ancestral haplotype,
i.e. the same haplotype as Adrian, the earliest known common ancestor.
Participants with results for more than 37 markers have an arrow to the right of their first 37 markers. Click on the arrow to see the rest of their results.

Mutations and Lineages

The chart above shows our Group 3 participants whose lines are known, along with any mutations.
We know the haplotype for each person whose name is in dark blue. We need to test more people to ascertain
the haplotypes of those whose names are in lighter blue. The only mutation for which we have determined the
generational event is Adrian's son William's mutation to 10 at DYS 385a. I have placed the notation of
that mutation in the chart to show where it occurred (i.e. when Adrian begot William), and we can expect everyone in William's line to have that mutation.
We know, therefore, that A27's William is a descendant of Adrian's son William. That helps us narrow the gap in A27's lineage considerably.

Where I've noted a mutation below a participant's identification number, we don't know the generation in which it occurred;
we only know that it occurred between the participant and his most recent ancestor whose name is in dark blue.

To establish where the mutations listed along the bottom of the chart occurred, we would want to test a
descendant of a brother of the highest person in the line whose name is in light blue.

The chart above shows our Group 3 participants with gaps in their lineages. Again, the haplotypes of those
in dark blue are known; the haplotypes of those in light blue are unknown. Because A27 has the telltale mutation which occurred when Adrian begot William, we
know A27 must be descended from William. This chart shows Joseph, Adrian's youngest son, who was in the South Carolina census in 1800 with a young man in his household.
We have never been able to identify any sons of Joseph, and it could well be that one or more of our participants with gaps is his descendant.

Descendants' Chart

The chart below shows only the direct lines of the participants in Group 3,
but omits those whose exact connection is yet unknown.