If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

I think there's a summary report generated as well - my first thought would be to run the tests again with 7.9 mesa from git and see what changes.

I have seen a number of side-by-side comparisons of piglet results, all in apparently the same format, which makes me think there is probably a standard mechanism for comparing results from multiple runs (rather than copy/paste into a spreadsheet).

Comment

I think there's a summary report generated as well - my first thought would be to run the tests again with 7.9 mesa from git and see what changes.

I'm trying not to kill the box here, and even Fedora 13 is only using Mesa 7.8! (So F13 is obsolete before it's even been released! Yay!) What will I need to compile and install Mesa 7.9? A new libdrm? A different Xserver?

Comment

Mesa 7.9 is in very early development (in fact git master turned to 7.9 a week ago or so, before that it was 7.8), so 7.8 is not that obsolete Bridgman was talking about git master, I think. It should easily work with F13 without compiling everything from git.

Ask if the devs are interested in failing tests, see if there are open bug reports about these, and if not, file new bugs... (if you find something broken which worked in 7.7/7.8, do a bisect to find the problem).

Does this include libdrm? I think I'll need libdrm from git to compile git Mesa, but F12 only has libdrm-2.4.17-1.fc12.i686. So would multiple, different installations of libdrm be a problem? Would the Xserver / xorg-drv-ati be able to handle that?