Location: Where the Atlantic is in the North and the Pacific in the South.

Posts: 7,465

Re: Are anti-racists anti-white?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert

The argument of race being based on color was pointless, that is why I made my comment with the opening statement "Race has absolutely nothing to do with "Color." And followed through to explain that Whites/Caucasians are the only "true" people of color.

I was just pointing out how ludicrous it is for minorities, especially Negroes, to claim that they are people of "color," as though Whites/Caucasians are void of color, when in fact they are the only people who have the natural genetic ability to produce and exhibit a wide spectrum of colors.

Sure, and if we go to the pure chromatography of the issue, black is the only non-color, since color is the absence of light.

Quote:

And as far as Milky White "Whites" actually being the color of milk, I don't know what type of milk you are drinking, but from my estimation, they are pretty damn close.

As I type I am looking at a picture of the whitest person I have ever seen and he is wearing a white t-shirt and you can tell the difference in color between his shirt and his skin.

Quote:

As far as discussions of race and color are concerned, absolutely it has everything to do with the discussion, because race is not skin deep, and typically only Whites/Caucasians can exhibit those unique color characteristics as I stated.

In terms of eye and hair color, yes, but of course the brown pallete of the non-whites can be as rich as the beige pallette of the whites.

Quote:

The analogy being that if science were to discover a means by which people could decide what color skin their children would have, Negroes will always exhibit the genetic characteristics of a Negro no matter what their skin color may be, as would Whites/Caucasians or Asians.

Of course I am one to believe that Caucasians and Asians are more closely related genetically to each other, than either are to Negroes.

Im a Neo Socialist, and i believe that im not a racist (Though many argue with that) because i truly dont care about the colour of someones skin or their religion. the thing i am totally against is the disease, multiculturalism.

its the tolerance laws that force me and the dwindling white race to conform to accepting this garbage that i deeply oppose.

i know the tones seem racist, but the destruction of my country's culture, religion and language is unacceptable.

so to answer the question, no i am defiantly not anti white, i am extremely proud to be white European and i agree with a lot of National Socialist ideas, but its those pro multiculturalist that is the problem, because its the culture of arabs that make them theifs, the culture of Jews to be money hungry and sneaky, the the culture of asians to accept **** pay and steal jobs and its the culture of blacks to embrace and glorify violence

in my honest opinion, accepting this 'garbage' is giving up. Hence, here I am at stormfront, willing to learn all I can to prepare for the inevitable clash with the government for taking away bit by bit, every belief I hold dear.

Well that's a pretty big and ignorant assumption. While some anti-whites may disguise themselves as anti-racist, many anti-racists, like me, truly do believe that through unity and cooperation we can achieve less conflict and a better society, and letting go of prejudiced views is the first step. Plus, think about what you said... Almost EVERY SINGLE COUNTRY in this world is facing racial problems! From the USA racist groups, Argentinian white "supremacy", Mexico, French Arabs vs Europeans, Rwandan Hutus vs Tutsis, Sudan's genocides, Israel, South Africa, Zimbabwe, China, Costa Rica, etc. THere will always be conflicts, and it is due to stereotypes, discriminations, and assumptions such as yours that fuel them.

I don't doubt you are Anti-White but I believe that subconsciously most anti-racists shy away from Whites as a reflex action.

I further believe that it is naive to think that through "unity" that "racism" can be "eradicated".

Face it; in your world, Whites would be oppressed to obliteration. You must ask yourself what would happen to you if you were stranded in a non-white neighborhood at 3 o'clock in the morning. If you happen to be White, this is a possibly fatal scenario. Admit it, in your world "Whites are dead meat" and you know it.

Also, "assumptions such as yours". There are no "assumptions". Racial Pride exists for a reason, because every race evolved separate and distinct from other races. What "Anti racists" and "Anti-White" people want to do, is unnatural and goes completely against what 2 million years of evolution has proven correct and natural.

No, I don't think that anti-racists are anti-white. I am white, yet I am against racism. One, you talk about evolution, yet wouldn't it be against evolution to stay in the same place, never moving foward.
Ya know why I think people were enslaved to begin with? Its because they had never seen black people before, so they were shocked.

Also, in a sense black people are higher up the evolutionary chain. They have better resistance to the sun than white people. So in a sense, blacks are superior to whites in nature

Depends on the enviornment. In an enviornment where the sun was bright and hot, that would be an advantage, but in a cold, cloudy one, its not. The skin wouldnt be able to create Vitamin D3.

most liberals (white) are anti-racist and are therefore pro black and therefore they are traitors against their own nation.

I am speaking from a South African point of view, since the rest of the world can/must decide for themselves.

in 1994 liberal white south africans went and voted to allow blacks equal rights well look what happened since then, in my opinion liberals are as bad or worse than blacks and should be forced to go live with them !!