A Point to Ponder

Now that SCOTUS has decreed governmeant has unrestrained powers to tax, what's next ?

Enter the "wayback machine" and recall NY Sen. Monihyan's 1993 proposal to impose a 10,000 % tax on 9MM ammunition. If taxation is a "free lunch" - per the recent SCOTUS decision - to compel Americans to "think/behave right", (i.e. in a politically acceptable manner), what's to stop government from imposing similarly egregious taxes upon any/all ammunition/components ? such an onerous level of taxation would almost certainly deny the use of firearms to the "middle class". IOW, all but the wealthy and criminals would be, defacto, disarmed.

And you believed the MSM hype the SCOTUS decision only involved your health care ! >MW

Like him, or hate him, everybody must admit that having congress now mandated to reveal a tax, as a tax, is good for everybody. If bHo would have had this law in place prior to trying to pass majestycare, it wouldn't have gotten past first base.

Look at cigarettes. Big brother decides no one should smoke and the went from $10 a carton to $65. Everyone jumped on that band wagon. It's the same thing with ammo. All the anti gun people will jump on that band wagon also. It seems no one cares about some ones rights if it has no affect on them..

Like Us On Facebook!

The Firearms Forum is on online community for all gun enthusiasts. Join us to discuss firearms of all kinds, gun accessories, legal issues and more. Membership is free and we welcome all types of shooters, whether you're a novice or a pro. Come for the info, stay and make some friends.