Monday, 26 December 2016

5 Debunked Marijuana Myths the State Uses to Keep US in the Stone Age

There’s a
movement underway in America. It involves changing the way Americans view a federally
designated controlled substance it classifies as a Schedule I
narcotic. Over the last few years, twenty-nine U.S. states have now acted
against the federal government’s ban on marijuana, and have voted to legalize
cannabis for either medicinal or recreational purposes.

But even
with so many Americans voting against the long-standing federal ban on a
natural, healing herb, a plant no-less, much misconception still abounds with
respect to marijuana, its users, and the impact it has on society. In the
following essay, a close examination of the claims against cannabis will be
examined, and hopefully, in the end, a better understanding will take place,
and myths long associated with cannabis use will finally be dispelled.

Misconception
Number 1 – Cannabis (marijuana) is a Gateway Drug

It’s been
said so much it may seem like an immutable fact, “Marijuana is a gateway drug.”
But nothing could be further from the truth. According to one research study
(Morral, 2002) which sought to examine the available research theorizing
cannabis to be a gateway drug, marijuana users were only likely to try harder
drugs if they were offered those drugs by a friend or a dealer, for example.
The researchers concluded, “something like a marijuana gateway effect probably
does exist, if only because marijuana purchases bring users in contact with the
black market that also brings increases access to hard drugs.”

In other
words, the researchers concluded since marijuana is illegal for most
purchasers, even purchasers where marijuana may be legal (whose users may not
be card carrying medicinal marijuana licensed users), those who are seeking
marijuana may find themselves faced with temptation to use harder drugs because
street dealers will sell them any drug they may be peddling.

The
researchers concluded that only a “tiny fraction” of marijuana users are at
risk for turning to harder drugs, simply because those said individuals have a
propensity to experimenting with those harder drugs. With those conclusions in
mind, being able to regulate marijuana like alcohol, even allowing for it to be
purchased for recreational use, will permit cannabis users and those
wishing to experiment with cannabis to come in contact with just marijuana, not
the other harder drugs found on the street.

Proponents
of marijuana foresee a day where it’s sold only at tightly
regulated dispensaries and believe that a legal system is the only real
and effective way to combat the criminal black market. Such dispensaries
provide a safe place to do business, free from the shame and stigma of “buying
drugs off the street” and away from the availability of harder drugs such as
cocaine and heroin.

Misconception
Number 2 – Marijuana Use Leads to More Traffic Fatalities

Citing the National Highway
Traffic Safety Association, Forbes reported that not only
is marijuana use safer than alcohol use when it comes to driving, but far fewer
fatalities are recorded when marijuana is present than when alcohol is present
in traffic fatality instances. “It looks like marijuana’s impact on traffic
safety has been greatly exaggerated,” writes Forbes.

There’s no
question marijuana use impairs a person’s ability to operate a vehicle,
especially when the drivers are young and male. But in Colorado, where
recreational marijuana is currently legal, driving under the influence (DUI)
citations are on the decline, as reported by the Denver Post, and highway fatalities are at an historic low,
according to The Washington Post.

Compared to
alcohol, which is legal in all 50 states, cannabis is much safer. Forbes
writes, “a 2015 National Highway Traffic Administration (NHTSA) study…found no
statistically significant association between marijuana use and crash risk once
the researchers adjusted for confounding variables (such as the aforementioned
age and sex). The explanation for this difference may be that the NHTSA
analysis included any drivers who tested positive for active THC, whether or
not they were still feeling the effects.”

Given these
statistics, one might hypothesize that if those who are currently drinking and
driving, would give up alcohol, and use marijuana instead, driving under the
influence fatalities might further diminish. However, more research into that
theory should be undertaken before any such conclusion could be drawn.

Misconception
Number 3 – Marijuana Use Increases Crime Rates

Actually,
the “War on Drugs” produces more criminals than the substances do, according to one
recent editorial. Fox News’
John Stossel addressed the issue of drugs and violence saying, “Violent?
People who get high are rarely violent. The violence occurs because when
something’s illegal, it is sold only on the black market. And that causes
crime. Drug dealers can’t just call the cops if someone tries to steal their
supply. So they form gangs and arm themselves to the teeth.” Some police
officers agree. Neil Franklin, a 33-year veteran police officer from Maryland
used to kick down doors during drug raids and admitted he used to feel that
drugs made people violent.

Franklin now
is a proponent for ending the prohibition against cannabis, leading the group
known as LEAP, Law Enforcement Against Prohibition. “It must be difficult to be
an opponent of marijuana reform. They can’t make arguments against legalization
based on logic and facts so they must constantly resort to fear-based
hypotheticals and anecdotes that keep getting proved wrong by systematic study.
I feel for them. I really do,” he said.

Citing a
longitudinal research study by the University of Texas, Dallas, LEAP maintains where marijuana is legal, the crime rates
for homicides and assault are slightly lower. Franklin told Stossel, “We
have the violence of these gangs competing for market share, and people get
hurt.” He added the current police tactics in the war on drugs are ineffective
and actually create more war on drug victims. “Drugs can be — and are in many
cases — problematic,” he told Stossel adding, “But the policies that we have in
place to prohibit their use are 10 times more problematic.”

When police
officers decide to start busting down doors in a frenetic search for drugs, “We
end up with kids being shot … search warrants being served on the wrong home,
innocent people on the other side of the door thinking that they are protecting
their home,” he stated lamenting his role in police raids. Stossel indicated
that legalizing all drugs, following the example set by the country of
Portugal, might actually reduce drug addiction and end the notion that
police officers and modern day policing are the enemies, allowing law
enforcement to focus their attentions on real crime and hardened criminals.

The failure
of the war on drugs may best be described by USA Today’s editorial board. “With
an average 78 Americans dying each day from overdoses of
prescription opioid painkillers and heroin, it’s clear that the U.S. is
losing the war on drugs. The epidemic has spread to suburbia and rural
areas. The death toll from heroin has more than tripled since
2010. And the nation is desperate for answers,” they write.

The truth is
that the real drug killers of Americans are powerful prescription pain pills,
opiates, and as The Free Thought Project has faithfully reported, their abuse
has reached epidemic levels, now accounting for more fatalities than car accidents. All the while,
marijuana is showing promise as a much safer alternative for pain than deadly opiates.
In fact, in states where marijuana is legalized in some form, opiate deaths have plummeted.

Misconception
Number 4 – The Tax Money Legal Marijuana Generates Never Makes It to Schools

According to
one pro-marijuana
legalization advocacy group, citing the Colorado Department of Revenue’s
marijuana statistics, “the regulated marijuana market generated more than $156
million in state tax revenue and license fees in FY 2015-2016, including $40
million in tax revenue for school construction projects — fulfilling the
promise of Amendment 64 — plus an addition $2.45 million also earmarked for
public schools. These figures do not include local taxes and fees (e.g.
Denver).”

If the
schools never see a dime of the revenue being brought in from legal medical and
recreational marijuana sales, it may be due to legislative appropriation and
not revenue generation. In other words, the money’s coming in, but citizens
must be vigilant to ensure lawmakers simply don’t spend it for some other
purpose than in schools and education.

Misconception
Number 5 – Cannabis is Addictive and Legalization Will Lead To More Deaths From
Overdose, Cancer, and Violence

“Millions of
Americans have tried marijuana, but most are not regular users [and] few marijuana
users become dependent on it … [A]lthough [some] marijuana users develop
dependence, they appear to be less likely to do so than users of other drugs
(including alcohol and nicotine), and marijuana dependence appears to be less
severe than dependence on other drugs,” concluded a federal study conducted by
the National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine. Drug treatment
facilities also know this. While it is possible for one to seek treatment for
cannabis dependence, few drug treatment facilities will even consider admitting
someone if their drug of choice is cannabis

There’s a
reason why stoners “chill” when they smoke weed. It’s because cannabis relaxes
its users, who are much less likely to become violent while stoned. One
research study concluded cannabis use “reduces likelihood of violence” and
concluded “alcohol is clearly the drug with the most evidence to support a
direct intoxication-violence relationship”. Put simply, your town drunk is more
likely to pick a fight with you than your neighborhood pothead is.

According to
one
source, “The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports
that more than 30,000 annual U.S. deaths are attributed to the health effects
of alcohol (i.e. this figure does not include accidental deaths). On the other
hand, the CDC does not even have a category for deaths caused by the health
effects of marijuana. A study published in Scientific Reports in January 2015
found that the mortality risk associated with marijuana was approximately 114
times less than that of alcohol.” Going further, “there has never been a case
of an individual dying from a marijuana overdose. Meanwhile, the CDC attributes
more than 1,600 U.S. deaths per year to alcohol poisoning.” Alcohol has been
known to cause cirrhosis of the liver as well. But weed works as an anti-inflammatory, and a natural anti-depressant, potentially much safer than the selective serotonin
re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and carries no black box warning label like they
do.

Alcohol use
is associated with a wide variety of cancers, including cancers of the
esophagus, stomach, colon, lungs, pancreas, liver and prostate. Marijuana use
has not been conclusively associated with any form of cancer. In fact, a 2009
study contradicted the long-time government claim that marijuana use is
associated with head and neck cancers. It found that marijuana use actually
reduced the likelihood of head and neck cancers.

If you are
concerned about marijuana being associated with lung cancer, you may be
interested in the results of the largest case-controlled study ever conducted
to investigate the respiratory effects of marijuana smoking and cigarette
smoking. Released in 2006, the study, conducted by Dr. Donald Tashkin at the
University of California at Los Angeles, found that marijuana smoking was not
associated with an increased risk of developing lung cancer. Surprisingly, the
researchers found that people who smoked marijuana actually had lower
incidences of cancer compared to non-users of the drug.

So there you
have it! Armed with these facts and more, proponents of the legalization of
cannabis can take their case to the court of public opinion and win over the
jury of their peers, swaying the population to embrace marijuana as medicine
for a whole host of illnesses. Those who are sitting cautiously on the fence, waiting
to draw their own conclusions now have more research studies to ponder. And
proponents of continuing the decades-long prohibition of cannabis no longer
have a leg to stand on.

We provide
a live link to your original material on your site (and links via social
networking services) - which raises your ranking on search engines and helps
spread your info further!

This site
is published under Creative Commons (Attribution) CopyRIGHT (unless an
individual article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright
holder). Reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged - if you
give attribution to the work & author and include all links in the original
(along with this or a similar notice).

Feel free
to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you
never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember
attribution!

If you
like what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too small or too large)
or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

Live long
and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible worlds…

1 comment:

Pot makes you stupid, and lazy, and the so called "political government" which is the largest organized crime organization, can , make more money on it than they already are, then they'll legalize (criminalize) it....

Follow New Illuminati on Twitter

SUBSCRIBE to the NEW ILLUMINATI YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Contact Us

Welcome to the new Enlightenment, an era when suppressed science, hidden history and the enlightening nature of reality are all revealed to those with eyes to see and ears to hear.

These are the thoughts and ideas of New Illuminati - bold forerunners and pioneers of new awareness all over the globe.

Notes on new emerging paradigms from the NEXUS New Times Magazine Founder R. Ayana, who lives in a remote Australian rainforest (and is no longer involved with the magazine) - Catching drops from the deluge in a paper cup since 1984.

§ 107.Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include — (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

This material is published under Creative Commons Copyright – reproduction for non-profit use is OK. Awesome Inc. theme. Powered by Blogger.

Claimer

All opinions, facts, debates and conjectures xpressed herein are xtrusions of macrocosmic consciousness into your field of awareness. The New Illuminati are not to be held responsible or accountable for flashes of insight, epiphany, curiosity, transformation or enlightenment experienced by any person, human or otherwise.