Comment

You lost because you're too stupid to understand simple math. 75 yards/game>57 yards/game. Reed's better because he stuck around to have four more average seasons; right? Running a 20-yard reverse once or twice a season isn't even as valuable as Irvin's blocking game-in game-out; twitstick.

LMFAO You laugh at the pro-bowls because it's the fans even though Andre had 2 more pro-bowls and before 1995 when it was the coaches/players yet you agree with the Hall which is just journalists DUDE YOUR LOGIC IS SO MUCH FAIL.

Comment

LMFAO You laugh at the pro-bowls because it's the fans even though Andre had 2 more pro-bowls and before 1995 when it was the coaches/players yet you agree with the Hall which is just journalists DUDE YOUR LOGIC IS SO MUCH FAIL.

And you think less than 1,000 yards receiving is a legendary Hall Of Fame superstar season? Ignore actual production; but pay attention to All-Star game voting. Pro Bowls aren't production, ignoramus.

Comment

Since you jacked a whole column from nobody blogger and Eagles troll Mike Pansier I'll just post actual Hall Of Fame voter Dr. Z's thoughts on the matter and leave it at that. Idiots who bring Pro Bowl selections into debates as their final word on a subject just ain't worth it.

Dr. Z: Very heated. I think some people just didn't like him. But for me, it was just too logical that he belonged in. He was the do-it-all receiver for a three-time champion. He could catch anything. He was a leader who helped get the team to work hard. He blocked. He was tough. And he never had any help at the other receiver position. Maybe his numbers weren't as big as some others, but the Cowboys had Emmitt Smith, so of course they weren't going to throw that much.