Tuesday, August 04, 2015

Ignoring the obvious (corruption, Sinjar, bombings)

Peter O'Dowd: Is the deteriorating infrastructure in Iraq a bigger threat than ISIS is?Mitchell Prothero: Well let's put it this way: one of the things
whenever I speak with people who live in ISIS areas, the first thing
they say is that immediately the public utilities and things get more
efficient. In a lot of cases, there isn't electricity because the
government controls that. But the trash gets picked up, water, bread,
all this stuff comes out. You know, what people need to accept in the
post-US invasion environment, the Iraqis have yet to put together a
government that's, you know, anything vaguely closely to competent. The
infrastructure in Baghdad has never been improved, billions have been
spent, mostly stolen and so, when you do get a spike, because 115, 118
degrees, that's not completely unusual this time of year, but when it
pops up to 125 or so and you've basically lost the largest oil refinery
in Iraq -- destroyed in fighting, and then you throw in that the
government's bankrupt and fighting wars on several different fronts,
the whole thing just comes apart.

"Billions have been spent, mostly stolen" and "the government's bankrupt."

Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister for Energy Affairs, Bahaa al-Aaraji, said
the former government of Nouri al-Maliki has wasted around $1 trillion
of public funds.“The former government (of Maliki) has wasted
around $1 trillion. $800 billion came from Iraq’s oil budget since 2004
till 2014 while $200 billion came from donations and aid,” Aaraji told
reporters on Friday according to a report by Asharq al-Awsat.

Nouri is a thug. And he needs to be held accountable for all the money he fleeced.

SPIEGEL: Iraq is at war, but it is not the only crisis affecting
the country. Many residents of Baghdad use the word "thieves" when they
talk about your politicians. How corrupt is your government? Al-Abadi: We have problems and the way I am dealing with them is
to start by admitting them. Corruption is a huge issue. It has to do
with the society, which has changed -- both during the times of Saddam
Hussein's regime and after. Also, the sanctions had an adverse effect on
society in nurturing this culture of corruption. During the 1960s or
1970s, bribery was very rare in Iraq. The number of government employees
was very small and usually they were the elite. But then they
incorporated millions of people into the government -- not to better run
the state, but to control the people. We are in the process of
implementing a number of processes and procedures that aim to curb the
extent of corruption. SPIEGEL: One of your first actions after you took office was to
close the office of your predecessor's son, who is said to have provided
huge government contracts to people who were ready to pay the most for
them. Young college graduates claim they had to pay officials $10,000 to
$20,000 in order to obtain government jobs. Why should Iraqis have any
faith in this government?

Al-Abadi: We need to flip the system. Four years ago, the
government tried to stop the corruption at the Passport Office, where
people pay $400 to $500 just to get their passport issued. Every day
they were arresting so many people and it did not have much of an
effect. But if you ease the procedure, for instance making the document
available online, it puts an end to it altogether. I don't want to fill
our prisons with people who ask for petty cash while we are facing this
major terrorist threat to the country. I want to keep these prisons for
the actual criminals who are killing people or for people who are
stealing vast amounts of money from the people. I want to change how we
run the government in Iraq.

He never comments on that: "One of your first actions after you took office was to close the office of your predecessor's son, who is said to have provided huge government contracts to people who were ready to pay the most for them."

He just sidesteps it, ignores it. He's asked "how corrupt is your government" and responds directly without any offence. But he can't answer about Ahmed al-Maliki?

Let's stop pretending anything's changed with regards to Haider.

There's a lot of pretending going on.

For example, at The Conversation, Tyler Fisher, Muslih Mustafa, Nahro Zagros want to note a year since Mount Sinjar, when Yazidis were trapped on the mountain and being attacked, the incident that led Barack to start bombing Iraq. The three write:The crisis in Sinjar is subsiding, and the Peshmerga have gradually
retaken some of the areas that IS had overrun. But the atrocities are
still a relentless daily reality for thousands of Yazidis still in
captivity, for those in precarious refugee camps and for their relatives
abroad, bereaved or longing to be reunited.

Several thousand remain in the mountains, cut off from humanitarian aid – and the threat of annihilation has not abated.

Credit to the three for not pretending all Yazidis were rescued.

How sad that Barack's actions last August have still not paid off.

But there's another detail and Mitchell Prothero was noting it in his Here & Now interview yesterday.

Sinjar itself?

Still under Islamic State control all these months (12) later.

Twelve months after Barack began bombing Iraq and nothing has changed.

About Me

We do not open attachments. Stop e-mailing them. Threats and abusive e-mail are not covered by any privacy rule. This isn't to the reporters at a certain paper (keep 'em coming, they are funny). This is for the likes of failed comics who think they can threaten via e-mails and then whine, "E-mails are supposed to be private." E-mail threats will be turned over to the FBI and they will be noted here with the names and anything I feel like quoting.
This also applies to anyone writing to complain about a friend of mine. That's not why the public account exists.