A Stitch in Timeby David Wrightson, Acanthus, Lawrence & Wrightson Architects(published in association with the SPAB)

Tab 4

Operational principles for integrating IHBC’s research, guidance and advocacy for the production of Standards: A strategy for evidence-based conservation standards in the IHBC

Drafts approved by IHBC’s Committees for Policy and for Education, Training and Standards, 2014

Context: Standards in practice and quality assuranceThe need to value of standards in the discipline of conservation is acknowledged in the IHBC’s Corporate Plan 2010-15 (CP 10), Action 2.1:

‘Produce framework for development and adoption of standards appropriate to the IHBC as an interdisciplinary professional body.’

Standards are a fundamental tool in professional processes. Standards can play especially critical roles in conservation by:

generating efficiencies in the delivery of conservation, by representing agreed and consolidated principles of practice, and

helping in the scrutiny of that practice within quality assurance processes.

This note explains how the IHBC can integrate its core activities and unique resources to achieve its corporate objectives through a focus on evidence-based conservation standards.

Issue: Challenges for interdisciplinary standardsConservation is inherently an interdisciplinary activity (ICOMOS 1993). Barriers to that interdisciplinary activity will threaten successful conservation. Unless standards reinforce practice inclusively across the relevant disciplines they may be seen as obstructive to the delivery of outcomes rather than as conclusive statements on how to secure those outcomes.

To date, conservation standards usually have been based on a description of practice, often based on judgement within a particular discipline. If standards remain no more than the description of a judgement within one or more select disciplines, they are unlikely to be adopted as the definitive statement on the effective delivery of sustainable conservation outcomes.

However, if conservation standards are based on sound evidence, they will offer a secure foundation for their adoption by all parties involved in the delivery of conservation, regardless of practice or discipline.

IHBC’s evidence-based standards for conservation professionalsEffective conservation standards should be developed out of research-based evidence supported by practice-based guidance. Sound evidence must be developed within a credible evidence-based research process. However that research can underpin practice only where proven in operation. Testing of evidence-based practice standards takes place through the development and operation of guidance for practitioners.Consequently, the IHBC’s development of standards will begin with developing research that generates evidence to shape practice through guidance that, when tested, underpin standards.In summary, the IHBC will develop its standards as follows, by:

Promoting research, gathering data to establish Evidence

Developing Evidence into Guidance that shapes Practice

Testing Guidance, in Practice, to underpin Standards

IHBC priorities for production of standards – Strategic: AdvocacyThe IHBC is uniquely placed to integrate conservation research, guidance and standards to deliver advocacy supporting conservation outcomes. The IHBC’s priorities in planning for research, guidance and standards, consequently, are shaped by their potential to deliver advocacy.

Principles in identifying and interpreting evidenceAs conservation is an interdisciplinary process, the nature and scope of the practice of conservation is necessarily diverse.

To ensure that the IHBC’s strategy for developing standards is fit-for-purpose, appropriate interpretation strategies must be identified. Specific approaches are justified for use by the IHBC where they sit within the recognised framework of evidence-based conclusions as follows: