I've not used a 2014 CTD, the word is they've fixed them from last year. Which means that there's only the usual Fox reasons not to buy them If it's 32s vs Revs that's an easy one, long 32s are made of rubber, an xc fork stretched til it was too long, then stretched some more.

yeah normally i would go rockshox but my new bike has the 2013 rear fox ctd shock and i can get the 140mm ctd to match for £400 new.... but i do like the look of the 2014 revs with the rct3. Think ill end up going for them.

They are not literally rubber, no. But they're enormously less stiff than a Revelation. I'm not really that fussed about flex but the braking flex in a 140mm 32 is pretty silly, and no reason to tolerate that when other companies do it better.

Course, rather than try and make a competitive 32, Fox invented the 34...

The rev and fox platforms are about the same stiffness.
I've run them side by side having owned them both.
The stanchions of the revs have less flex (fore and aft) but the arch connecting the lowers has more flex. The fox having less side to side flex but a bit more fore and aft.
Having run them both they are pretty equal for stiffness when you take both factors into account.

which CTD's are you actually looking at?
32's long XC, light rider duties (missus gets on fine with them, I don't rate their stiffness - then again the 20mm bolt through Revs from a few years back flex too much for me)
34's in 160 nice and stiff - not a 36 which isn't a bad thing. They are Stiff Enough for 90% of the riding. Not something I would use all year as a replacement for a lyrik or 36 but something I'm happy to strap on my trail bike.

Not tried the new RS forks as I'm happy enough with my 34's after a service and tweak of the oil levels.

Yea its what I've just sold had the 2013 rlt revs, but i wanted to get tapered forks and come down to 140mm to fit with my new frame better. Hopefully be here 2moro Its great they come with a seal kit and pump too…. extra bonus