Uh oh…Republicans control redistricting too

Republicans don’t just control much of the electoral map. In some cases, they now have the power to redraw it.

Overwhelming victories in statehouses and governors’ races across the country this week have placed the GOP in command of redrawing both congressional and legislative districts to conform with Census results. It’s a grueling and politically charged process that typically gives the party in power an inherent advantage for a decade, allowing them to preserve current strongholds or to put others in play.

Along with gains in governorships this week, Republicans picked up about 680 legislative seats — twice the number Democrats gained in their wave two years ago. For the GOP, it’s a surge that comes at the most opportune time.

“Regardless of what happens in Washington, the Democrats will not soon recover from what happened to them on a state level on Tuesday,” said Chris Jankowski, executive director of the Republican State Leadership Committee’s REDMAP project. “It was significant. It was devastating in some areas. It will take years to recover.”

Tim Storey, a redistricting expert at the National Conference of State Legislatures, estimates that Republicans will have unilateral control over the redrawing of 195 congressional districts. Democrats have just 45. The remainder are in states where either both parties have a chance to influence redistricting or where decisions will be made by independent commissions.

That doesn’t mean there will be another surge of Republicans two years from now. After all, parties still must adhere to a substantial series of legal limitations governing the composition of the districts, such as making sure districts have a similar number of voters and are compact and contiguous.

And while redistricting has more recently become a refined science, Democrats can find at least some hope in looking at their own history: They had a redistricting advantage 20 years ago and then were hastily swept out of congressional power in 1994.

Storey said the Republican gains cannot be discounted but that it might not be as grand as the party is claiming.

“I think you can overstate it and I think you can understate it,” Storey said. “I think the truth is in the middle somewhere.”

Census data provided by the end of this year will determine whether a state has gained or lost population, which is used to determine the number of congressional seats that a state gets.

States will then get detailed Census data in early 2011 to help them divvy up legislative districts. States that gain or lose seats often get the most attention.

A political consulting firm that specializes in redistricting, Election Data Services Inc., projects that eight states will gain seats with the new Census numbers. Texas would get four. Florida would get two. Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, South Carolina, Utah and Washington would each get one.

EDS projects that 10 states will lose seats. New York and Ohio stand to each lose two. States that face the prospect of losing a seat include Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

Some states give independent commissions power to draw the boundaries, but it is largely a politically charged process. Of those 18 states that will apparently be forced to redraw maps, Republicans will now control governorships in 13 of them, with election gains this week in Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

Similarly, the GOP will control both chambers in 10 of those 18 states’ legislatures. Three others are divided or yet to be decided.

But even states without a change in their congressional makeup face grueling battles, especially with a new crop of leadership. In North Carolina, Republicans emerged with control of both the House and Senate for the first time in more than a decade.

“Even in a state where you don’t gain or lose, you still have to redraw the lines,” Storey said. “Once you open up Pandora’s box, anything can happen. It could be just as rough and tumble in a state that has the same number than a state that gains or loses.”

4 COMMENTS

My father, an Ohio native, retired one year before the factory he worked for got sold. One year after that the company was packed up and sent to Mexico. My dad thanks his lucky stars that it wasn’t while us kids were still growing up. But that’s not the case for most families. The only thing that keeps money coming back to Sandusky from what I can tell now is Cedar Point and its tourist trappings. How sad is that for towns that were founded on manufacturing and trade, turning to service and tourism to bring in money. It makes grown men cry.

At least Sandusky has Cedar Point. You should see Toledo, Dayton, Akron, and Youngstown. The only thing keeping Dayton up now is Wright Patterson AFB and Wright State/Dayton University. Columbus, and Cincinnati to some extent, are holding their own. The rest are in big trouble.

I’m in Ohio, and pretty shocked people here would elect Kasich for govenor, as he worked for Lehman Brothers previously, and Portman to Senator, as he was Junior’s economic adviser and very much responsible for encouraging jobs to move overseas. They said election night first thing they would redistrict Ohio. So I’d imagine Ohio is going to be a red state for the next decade.

More telling is that we’ve lost enough population to lose two seats in Congress. What’s that say about the manufacturing base?

Comments are closed.

Our Privacy Policy

We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site.

These companies may use aggregated information (not including your name, address, email address or telephone number) about your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you.