HOW MANY INNOCENT PEOPLE WILL BE MURDERED BY BLACKS TODAY?..........THE LOOTING ACROSS AMERICA is as black as the staggering murder and crime rates of BLACKS ACROSS AMERICA. Black Lives Matter? NO LIFE MATTERS TO BLACKS!

Friday, November 25, 2011

THE LA RAZA OCCUPIERS – HATE LITERACY, EVEN WHEN IT’S HANDED TO THEM DISCOUNTED, AS MUCH AS THEY HATE SPEAKING THE LANGUAGE OF THE OCCUPIED GRINGOS!

IN MEXIFORNIA, THE LA RAZA DEMS HAVE CREATED A MEXICAN WELFARE STATE. WHILE HIGHER EDUCATION TUITION RATES FOR LEGALS HAS SOARED, THE LA RAZA LEGISLATURE HANDED A BILL TO LA RAZA JERRY BROWN THAT PROVIDED SPECIAL IN STATE TUITION DISCOUNTS TO ILLEGALS!

LA RAZA JERRY BROWN ALSO JUST SIGNED A BILL TO LAW MAKING IT !!! ILLEGAL !!! FOR EMPLOYERS TO USE E-VERIFY!

THERE ARE ONLY EIGHT (8) STATES WITH A POPULATION GREATER THAN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, WHERE NEARLY HALF OF ALL JOBS GO TO ILLEGAL USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. THIS SAME COUNTY PAYS OUT $600 MILLION IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, AND HAS THE HIGHEST MEXICAN GANG MURDER RATE IN THE NATION (ACCORDING TO CA A.G., KAMALA HARRIS, NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN THE STATE ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS).

BILLIONAIRE MAYOR OF NEW YORK CITY BLOOMBERG IS A LA RAZA SUPPORTER. HE WANTS OBAMA’S AMNESTY, OPEN BORDERS AND CONTINUED SABOTAGE OF E-VERIFY…! IT’S ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED WITH HORDES OF MEXICANS.

ONE REASON WHY MOST OF THE FORTUNE 500 ARE GENEROUS DONORS TO THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA “THE RACE”, IS BECAUSE HORDES OF ILLEGALS KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED FROM $300 TO $400 BILLION PER YEAR. THE REAL COST OF ALL THIS “CHEAP” LABOR IS ACTUALLY TRANSFERRED TO THE BACKS OF THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS TAXPAYERS. IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE, WHERE HALF OF ALL JOBS ARE HELD BY ILLEGALS USING A STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER, THE COUNTY PAYS OUT OF PROPERTY TAXES $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS. A QUARTER OF THIS GOES TO MEXICO’S ANCHOR BABY BREEDING, WHICH IS HOW MEXICO “ANCHORS” THEIR OCCUPATION OF MEXIFORNIA – THE MEX LOOTING AND WELFARE STATE.

MEXICANS LOATHE LITERACY LIKE THEY DO ENGLISH!

DROP BY LOS ANGELES PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL, SANTEE EDUCATIONAL COMPLEX WHERE THE STUDENT BODY IS OVERWHELMINGLY LA RAZA. THERE YOU WILL FIND CLASSES TAUGHT IN SPANISH. BOOKS AND HANDOUTS ARE IN SPANISH. STUDENTS SIT ON THEIR WELL FED FAT ASSES WHEN THE (AMERICAN) NATIONAL ANTHEM IS PLAYED, AND SCHOOL ASSEMBLIES END IN VIVA MEXICO! VIVA MEXICO!

WHAT ELSE DO YOU NEED TO KNOW?

OH, THE NEW YORK TIMES IS OWNED BY THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD, MEXICAN CARLOS SLIM. THE TIMES IS NOW MOUTHPIECE FOR LA RAZA SUPREMACY AND PROPAGANDA!

In the past two decades, the Mexican population in New York City has grown more than fivefold, with immigrants settling across the five boroughs. Many adults have demonstrated remarkable success at finding work, filling restaurant kitchens and construction sites, and opening hundreds of businesses.

But their children, in one crucial respect, have fared far differently.

About 41 percent of all Mexicans between ages 16 and 19 in the city have dropped out of school, according to census data.

No other major immigrant group has a dropout rate higher than 20 percent, and the overall rate for the city is less than 9 percent, the statistics show.

This crisis endures at the college level. Among Mexican immigrants 19 to 23 who do not have a college degree, only 6 percent are enrolled. That is a fraction of the rates among other major immigrant groups and the native-born population.

Moreover, these rates are significantly worse than those of the broader Mexican immigrant population in the United States.

The problem is especially unsettling because Mexicans are the fastest-growing major immigrant group in the city, officially numbering about 183,200, according to the Census Bureau, up from about 33,600 in 1990. Experts say the actual figure is far larger, given high levels of illegal immigration.

A small group of educators and advocates have begun various educational initiatives for Mexicans, and there is evidence of recent strides.

But the educators and advocates say that unless these efforts are sustained, and even intensified, the city may have a large Mexican underclass for generations.

“We are stanching an educational hemorrhage, but only partially,” said Robert C. Smith, a sociology professor at the City University of New York who studies the local Mexican population.

“The worst outcomes are still possible,” he added.

Experts say the crisis stems from many factors — or what Dr. Smith called “a perfect storm of educational disadvantage.”

Many Mexicans are poor and in the country illegally. Parents, many of them uneducated, often work in multiple jobs, leaving little time for involvement in their children’s education.

Some are further isolated from their children’s school life because of language barriers or fear that contact with school officials may lead to deportation.

Unlike some other immigrant populations, like the Chinese, Mexicans have few programs for tutoring or mentoring.

“We don’t have enough academic role models,” said Angelo Cabrera, 35, a Mexican immigrant who runs a nonprofit group that tutors Mexican and Mexican-American students in the basement of a church in the Mott Haven section of the Bronx.

Many young illegal immigrants in New York City say there is no point in staying in school because their lack of legal status limits their access to college scholarships and employment opportunities. Some drop out under the erroneous belief that they are not eligible to attend college. (Illegal immigrants who graduate from a high school in New York State or earn a G.E.D. are not only allowed to attend the state’s public university system, but are also eligible for in-state tuition.)

“They just give up,” said Karina Sosa, 22, a Mexican-American undergraduate at Baruch College and an education activist.

Educational achievement among Mexican immigrants is worse in New York than in the broader Mexican population around the country in part, experts say, because Mexicans in the city have shallower roots, less stable households and higher rates of illegal immigration.

Ivan Lucero, who emigrated illegally from Mexico with his mother when he was 6 and grew up in the Belmont area of the Bronx, said his parents urged him to stay in school and study. But his father was distracted by long work days, and his mother, who did not speak English, had no contact with the school.

Mr. Lucero said he began skipping classes to hang out with other young Mexicans who had formed a gang. Once heavily Italian, the neighborhood was experiencing an influx of Mexicans.

Mexican children were filling Belmont’s schools, Mexican workers were staffing restaurants in the Little Italy section around Arthur Avenue and Mexican-owned shops were popping up on every other block.

Many young Mexicans were compelled to get jobs to help their families. In high school, Mr. Lucero began working as a busboy, which further distracted him from school work, he said. He was forced to repeat 10th grade twice, though he would lie to his parents about how he was doing.

“You don’t think of nothing else but having fun with your friends, meeting up with girls, having your boys with you,” Mr. Lucero said. “The last thing you think of is school.”

He was expelled when he was 18, while still in 10th grade. Most of his Mexican friends from high school also dropped out and entered the work force, and so did one of his younger brothers.

“I don’t see many Mexican kids going to school,” said Mr. Lucero, now 28 and working as a waiter. “It’s horrible.”

These problems extend throughout the swelling Mexican immigrant diaspora in the New York region. They have also afflicted the population of second-generation Mexican-Americans: While educational achievement is far higher among American-born children with Mexican ancestry, it still lags behind the rates of most other foreign-born and native-born groups, according to census data, which was analyzed by Andrew A. Beveridge and Susan Weber-Stoger, demographers at Queens College.

Syndi Cortes, 19, one of five children of Mexican immigrants in the Highbridge section of the Bronx, said she dropped out after getting pregnant at 16. She had already been cutting most of her classes, she said, and so had most of her Mexican and Mexican-American friends.

Last year, she tried to resume school, but her mother, who was working long days as a housecleaner, was opposed to day care and forced her to drop out again to look after her baby.

Ms. Cortes said she felt stranded and regretful at not having a high-school degree. “I want to get back,” she said.

Many efforts to address the problem have centered on the City University of New York. In 2007, Jay Hershenson, senior vice chancellor for university relations, formed a special task force to study the issue, currently the only one of its kind at the university focusing on a specific immigrant population.

“The loss of talent, of human capital, was simply an educational catastrophe, one that CUNY had no intention of ignoring,” Mr. Hershenson said.

Over the past several years, CUNY, as well as the Mexican consulate in New York, several advocacy groups and others, have established afterschool tutoring, college-readiness and scholarship programs; college admissions and financial aid counseling for students and parents alike; and college fairs aimed at the Mexican population.

These programs have already yielded some gains, advocates say. In 2000, for instance, the high school dropout rate among Mexican immigrants in the city was 47 percent, six percentage points higher than the current rate.

But advocates say it has been a grinding, uphill battle.

“There are very few of us working on this problem,” said Mr. Cabrera, who founded his nonprofit organization, MASA-MexEd, after years of struggling to stay in school and get a college degree while also working to support himself. “We have thousands of students who need the support, and we can only provide the support to hundreds.”

He added, “I have to make sure that they keep their dreams alive.”

*

A CALIFORNIA TEACHER SEES & SPEAKS ON LA RAZA IN OUR SCHOOLS:

FORTY PERCENT OF THE STUDENT BODY IN CALIFORNIA CANNOT SPEAK ENGLISH.

Subject: Cheap Labor This should make everyone think, be you Democrat, Republican or IndependentFrom a California school teacher - - -"As you listen to the news about the student protests over illegal immigration, there are some things that you should be aware of:I am in charge of the English-as-a-second-language department at a large southern California high school which is designated a Title 1 school, meaning that its students average lower socioeconomic and income levels.Most of the schools you are hearing about, South Gate High, Bell Gardens, Huntington Park, etc., where these students are protesting, are also Title 1 schools.Title 1 schools are on the free breakfast and free lunch program. When I say free breakfast, I'm not talking a glass of milk and roll -- but a full breakfast and cereal bar with fruits and juices that would make a Marriott proud. The waste of this food is monumental, with trays and trays of it being dumped in the trash uneaten. (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK)I estimate that well over 50% of these students are obese or at least moderately overweight. About 75% or more DO have cell phones. The school also provides day care centers for the unwed teenage pregnant girls (some as young as 13) so they can attend class without the inconvenience of having to arrange for babysitters or having family watch their kids. (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK)I was ordered to spend $700,000 on my department or risk losing funding for the upcoming year even though there was little need for anything; my budget was already substantial. I ended up buying new computers for the computer learning center, half of which, one month later, have been carved with graffiti by the appreciative students who obviously feel humbled and grateful to have a free education in America. (OUR TAX DOLLARS A T WORK)I have had to intervene several times for young and substitute teachers whose classes consist of many illegal immigrant students here in the country less then 3 months who raised so much hell with the female teachers, calling them "Putas" whores and throwing things that the teachers were in tears.Free medical, free education, free food, day care etc., etc., etc. Is it any wonder they feel entitled to not only be in this country but to demand rights, privileges and entitlements? To those who want to point out how much these illegal immigrants contribute to our society because they LIKE their gardener and housekeeper and they like to pay less for tomatoes: spend some time in the real world of illegal immigration and see the TRUE costs.

The study found that between 1998 and 2010, the amount of campaign contributions for committee heads from the industries they were supposed to be regulating increased almost 600 percent.

*

OUR ENEMIES ARE STATIONED IN CONGRESS, THE HOUSE of WHORES!

THEY JOB IS TO SERVICE THEIR CORPORATE PAYMASTERS, CUT THEMSELVES DEALS, HAND OVER CAMPAIGN BRIBES AS “CONSULTANT FEES”, SABOTAGE ANY ATTEMPT AT ETHICS REFORM!

IN THE MEXICAN OCCUPIED STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ALL THE DEMS WORK EXCLUSIVELY TO BUILD THEIR FORTUNE AND FOR AMNESTY, or at least Obama’s continued non-enforcement, OPEN BORDERS, EXPANDED LA RAZA DREAM ACTS, AND NO E-VERIFY!

LA RAZA SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN IS ONE OF THE MOST CORRUPT POLITICIANS IN AMERICAN HISTORY. SHE HAS AMASSED A VAST FORTUNE IN DEALS SHE’S PUSHED IN THE SENATE THAT FOUND THEIR WAY INTO HER HUSBAND, RICHARD C. BLUM’S POCKETS. HER BIGGEST PAYMASTERS ARE CRIMINAL BANKSTERS, LA RAZA DONORS, WELLS FARGO and BANK of AMERICA, ALONG WITH THE CRIMINAL UTILITY MONOPOLY PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC AND THE FUCKING LAWYERS!

FEINSTEIN’S SISTER IN CRIME, BARBARA BOXER, CAME TO OFFICE A POOR WOMAN AND NOW HAS AMASSED MILLIONS BY SIMPLY SIPHONING OFF CAMPAIGN FUNDS TO HER SON, DOUGLAS BOXER AS “CONSULTANT FEES”. SHE NOW REPORTS $5 MILLION IN ASSETS, WHICH IS PROBABLY ONLY SMALL PART OF HER LOOTING. THIS IS A WOMAN PUT IN OFFICE BY SPECIAL INTEREST MONEY, AND THE VOTES OF ILLEGALS! FEW HISPANDER MORE THAN BOXER!

PELOSI ALSO COLLECTS BRIBES AS “CONSULTANT FEES”.

FEINSTEIN HIRES ILLEGALS AT HER S.F. HOTEL, ONLY MILES FROM HER $16 MILLION DOLLAR WAR PROFITEER MANSION.

PELOSI HAS LONG HIRED ILLEGALS AT HER ST. HELENA, NAPA WINERY.

FOR THEIR BIG AG BIZ DONORS, FEINSTEIN-BOXER HAVE THREE (3) TIMES PUSHED FOR A “SPECIAL AMNESTY” FOR ILLEGAL FARM WORKERS, DESPITE THE FACT ONE-THIRD OF THESE EXPLOITED PEOPLE WILL END UP ON CA’s WELFARE! CA NOW PUTS OUT $20 BILLION IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS AGAINST DEFICITS OF $28 BILLION!

FEINSTEIN WAS THE BANKSTERS’ FRONT FOR THE BANKSTER WRITTEN “BANKRUPTCY REFORM” THAT PREVENTS CONSUMERS FROM GOING TO BANKRUPTCY COURTS TO UNDO THE MORTGAGE SCAMS PERPETRATED ON THEM BY FEINSTEIN DONORS WELLS FARGO and BANK of AMERICA. SHE DID THIS EVEN AS HER PAYMASTERS WELLS FARGO HAD HAD THEIR CALIFORNIA MORTGAGE LICENSE !!! REVOKED !!! SINCE 2003 FOR MORTGAGE SCAMS THE CONTINUED TO PERPETRATE ON A NATION. AFTER THEIR MORTGAGE LICENSE WAS REVOKED, WELLS FARGO SIMPLY DECLARED ITSELF ABOVE STATE LAW AND WENT ON TO DEVASTATE COMMUNITIES ALL OVER THE NATION WITH THE MORTGAGE SCAMS.

FEINSTEIN’S PAYMASTERS WELLS FARGO IS THE BIGGEST FINANCIERS OF PAY DAY LOAN SHARKS. UNTIL THE FEDS CLOSED IT DOWN, WELLS FARGO WAS ALSO THE BANKSTERS TO THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS. SERVICING LA RAZA DRUG CARTELS EVENTUALLY COST THIS BANK A MASSIVE FINE, BUT NO CRIMINAL BANKSTER WENT TO PRISON FOR BREAKING THE LAW… They never do!

FEINSTEIN AND BOXER HAVE VOTED FOR ANY AND ALL NO-STRING BANKSTER BAILOUTS, AND HAVE NEVER OPENED T HEIR BIG FAT MOUTHS ABOUT FORECLOSURES IN CA, THE SECOND LARGEST CENTER FOR FORECLOSURE IN THE NATION.

NOR HAVE THEY OPENED THEIR BIG MOUTHS ABOUT THE STAGGERING UNEMPLOYMENT IN CA, AS THERE’S ALWAYS MORE ILLEGAL CROSSING OUR BORDERS RIGHT INTO OUR JOBS, OR ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING CENTERS!

WE CAN’T SAVE OUR STATE, OR PUSH BACK THE LA RAZA OCCUPATION AND WELFARE STATE UNTIL WE RID OURSELVES OF THESE WHORES!

*

Nearly half of US Congress members are millionaires

By Andre Damon 25 November 2011

Two studies published this month point to the transformation of the United States into a plutocracy.

Nearly half of Congress members are millionaires, including two thirds of Senators, according to a survey released last week by the Center for Responsive Politics.

Meanwhile, campaign contributions to the heads of congressional committees from industries they are responsible for regulating increased sixfold between 1998 and 2010.

The Center for Responsive Politics survey found that 250 out of the 535 members of congress have more than a million dollars in assets. Millionaires constitute (literally) 1 percent of the American population.

In 2010, the median net worth of a US senator averaged $2.63 million, according to the study. This figure had grown by about 11 percent since 2009, even as the income of an average American fell by between 2 and 3 percent.

Despite attempts by Democratic Party supporters to present the Democrats as defenders of working people, there are more millionaire Democratic senators (37) than Republicans (30). The median net worth of Senate Democrats was likewise higher: $2.69 million compared to $2.43 million.

The wealthiest member of Congress is Darrell Issa, the Republican chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. His estimated net worth is $448 million.

Issa was followed by Michael McCaul, a Republican Texas congressman, with $380 million; John Kerry, the former presidential candidate and Democratic senator from Massachusetts, with $231 million; Mark Warner, the Democratic senator from Virginia, with $192 million; and Herb Kohl, the Democratic Wisconsin senator, with $173 million.

Members of Congress are required to report their wealth and income, as well as that of their spouses and families. However, due to various accounting loopholes, the figures published in the survey are only approximations that could be off by hundreds of millions. For instance, the report stated that the minimum probable net worth of Darrell Issa is $195 million, while his maximum probable net worth is $700 million.

“It’s no surprise that so many people grumble about lawmakers being out-of-touch,” said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics. “Few Americans enjoy the same financial cushion maintained by most members of Congress—or the same access to market-altering information that could yield personal financial gains.”

They need not worry, however, since Congress members know that they have lucrative lobbying and finance jobs and speakers’ fees waiting for them after concluding their careers, earning many hundreds of thousands—or millions—of dollars long after they are out of public sight.

Another study, published November 16 by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, found that the heads of various congressional committees were lavishly paid off by the industries they were supposed to be regulating.

The study found that between 1998 and 2010, the amount of campaign contributions for committee heads from the industries they were supposed to be regulating increased almost 600 percent.

“They all try to suggest their fund-rising is not tied to the industries they regulate, but this shows that it is,” Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, told the New York Times. “People who are giving you that much money—it is not out of the goodness of their hearts—clearly they want something.”

The report notes that Representative Collin Peterson (D-Minnesota), the senior member of the Agriculture Committee, saw his donations from the agriculture industry grow by 711 percent between 1998 and 2010. His overall campaign contributions grew by 274 percent during that same period.

Meanwhile, House Financial Services Committee chairman Spencer Bacchus saw his contributions from financial services industries grow six fold since 1998. For his 2010 campaign, Bacchus earned two thirds of his campaign funds from industries he was supposed to be regulating.

*

"I see no evidence of anything improper in this body," said Senate Rules and Administration Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D‑Calif.) during the floor debate.

*

SENATORS DIVERTING CAMPAIGN FUNDS TO KIN

Senators Diverting Campaign Funds to Kin

Loophole in Ethics Rules Is One That the Senate Did Not Close Last Year

By Shailagh Murray

Washington Post Staff Writer

Sunday, February 24, 2008; A04

Under long‑standing congressional ethics rules, corporations, unions and other large organizations cannot directly pay senators stipends. But their contributions to senators' election campaigns can be paid without limit to the children, spouses, in‑laws and other relatives of the lawmakers, in a practice that has aroused controversy but is fully legal.

Since 2000, at least 20 members of the Senate dipped into their campaign contributions and wrote more than half a million dollars in checks to their own relatives, typically as payment for fundraising and other campaign work, according to a new report by the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW).

BOXER TAKES HER CAMPAIGN BRIBES AND LAUNDERS THEM THROUGH HER SON’S OFFICE. SHE SHOULD HAVE BEEN MARRIED TO PIMP RICHARD BLUM!

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D‑Calif.), for example, paid her son Douglas $320,409.17 in campaign donations through his company Douglas Boxer and Associates from 2001 to 2006, CREW found. Douglas Boxer is a lawyer and a 10‑year veteran of her political team, a Boxer spokesman said.

Sen. Mike Enzi (R‑Wyo.) paid his daughter‑in‑law Danielle Enzi $306,718.18 from his campaign accounts over the same period, according to the report. She was a fundraiser before she married into the Enzi family, an Enzi spokesman said. Sen. Jim Bunning (R‑Ky.) paid his daughter Amy Towles $138,933.37 over six years, CREW found. Bunning's office said it was for campaign accounting.

"It is an area that's ripe for abuse, for someone who wants to turn campaign funds into personal use," said Craig Holman, a lobbyist for the nonprofit group Public Citizen. Although most lawmakers do not abuse the practice, he said, "those campaign funds always come from special interests, and those special interests are always looking for something in return."

Information about the practice is not easy to find, because senators are required to disclose such payments only in the minutiae of their periodic public statements of campaign finance expenditure and do not flag the recipients as relatives. CREW staff compiled the data over nine months by looking at microfiche and electronic records for the 2002, 2004 and 2006 election cycles, and by tracing names.

None of these arrangements appears to violate federal election law (THESE FUCKERS MAKE THE LAWS!), noted Melanie Sloan, CREW's executive director. Although lawmakers are barred from hiring relatives as staffers in their legislative offices, family members may perform campaign work, as long as the pay is reasonable and the individuals are qualified.

Yet some lawmakers are seeking to restrict payments to some family members as part of a broader effort to eliminate opportunities for conflicts and improprieties ‑‑ an effort urged by watchdog groups such as CREW after ethics scandals over the past two years, including several cases involving lawmakers' family members on political payrolls who may or may not have performed much work.

The senators' family payments were relatively small, compared with the $5.1 million that 72 House members paid from campaign funds to relatives or to relatives' companies or employers during the same period, according to CREW. "We found much worse stuff in the House," Sloan said.

Yet the Senate has become a roadblock to changing the rules on family employment. The House, in contrast, approved legislation last July to ban payments from campaign or leadership funds to candidates' spouses and to require the disclosure of campaign payments to other immediate family members. The bill was sent to the Senate, where it has stalled indefinitely.

The House acted after disclosures that former lobbyist Jack Abramoff organized campaign contributions or other payments that wound up in the hands of several lawmakers' relatives. Rep. John T. Doolittle (R‑Calif.), who announced his retirement from the House last month, is under federal investigation along with his wife, Julie, in part related to employment for her provided by Abramoff and other lobbyists.

BOXER VOTES AGAINST STOPPING BRIBES SIPHONED THROUGH RELATIVES!

Senators took up the issue before passing the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act on Jan. 18, 2007. The law tightened rules on accepting meals, private plane rides and other perks from lobbyists. But an amendment to ban the practice of paying relatives for their campaign work was rejected 54 to 41, with Boxer voting "present."

Even senators with no relatives listed in the CREW report criticized the measure, offered by Sen. David Vitter (R‑La.), as overly harsh. "I see no evidence of anything improper in this body," said Senate Rules and Administration Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D‑Calif.) during the floor debate.

But Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D‑Calif.), who sponsored the House bill, said he thinks "there's some serious self‑interest involved" in the Senate's refusal to go along. Keeping a spouse on the payroll, Schiff said, "just struck me as an inherent conflict of interest. Most people are shocked that it's not a crime, and it should be outlawed." He is still seeking a senator to take up the cause in that chamber.

Some Senate family members do work for bargain prices, at least by Washington standards. Towles, who lives in Kentucky, has kept her father's campaign books since the 1990s, said Bunning spokesman Mike Reynard. He described her as "a one‑person office." Towles's Citizens for Bunning salary rose from $19,589.10 in 2001, according to CREW, to $23,180.60 in 2006. She received an additional $4,999 through the separate Political Hall of Fame PAC, the group found.

Enzi spokesman Coy Knobel said Danielle Enzi works as a contract fundraiser for the Wyoming senator and has other political and nonprofit clients. "I think it's essential to point out the work Danielle does for Senator Enzi is paid for by donors to his campaign," as opposed to public funds, Knobel said. "If the donors don't agree with something, then they don't have to give."

The campaign political director for Sen. Michael D. Crapo (R‑Idaho), whose wife, Susan, was paid $78,514.50 over six years, said Susan Crapo "has always been the top campaign hand." Jake Ball described her duties as "organizing and carrying out big events," along with keeping Crapo's schedule and driving him to events.

"She's able to make decisions and act on things that other campaign workers would not feel as bold at doing," Ball said. "Any dollars she's paid are dollars she has earned."

Other names on the CREW list include Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D‑Del.), whose sister, Valerie Biden Owens, has managed all of his Senate campaigns, dating back to 1972. She was paid $51,286.27 in 2002, according to CREW. Her daughter Catherine Owens, also known as Casey, was paid $3,618.51 for her job as a field organizer.

Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D‑Mass.) has paid nephews Joseph and Matthew Kennedy, who co‑chaired his 2006 reelection campaign, a total of $50,073.87 from his Kennedy for Senate 2012 campaign fund.

Sen. Richard Burr (R‑N.C.) reached to a farther branch of his family tree, employing Mary T. Fauth as the treasurer of his leadership political action committee, the Next Century Fund. Fauth is the wife of Burr's wife's brother, according to a spokesman for the senator, and earned $32,013 over six years, the report found.

*

JUDICIAL WATCH

JW GENERATES THE 10 MOST CORRUPT YEARLY. UNFORTUNATELY THERE’S ONLY ROOM FOR TEN WHORES ON THIS LIST.

PELOSI, OBAMA AND FEINSTEIN ARE TYPICALLY ALWAYS ON THE LIST!

FEINSTEIN’S PIMP HUSBAND, OBAMA DONOR RICHARD C. BLUM HANDS OUT BRIBES TO DEMS ALL OVER THE NATION SO THEY KEEP THEIR MOUTHS SHUT ABOUT FEINSTEIN-BLUM’S CRIMES. FEINSTEIN PAYS BRIBES TO OBAMA, BOXER, CLINTON, KERRY, AND THE OTHER WAR WHORE, JOE LIEBERMANN.

*

TEN MOST CORRUPT............................................

Unfortunately the corruption of these politicians noted is only a drop in the bucket of what they’re guilty of.

One common ground for all of them is they will all protect and cover each other’s crimes.

1. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D‑NY): In addition to her long and sordid ethics record, Senator Hillary Clinton took a lot of heat in 2007 – and rightly so – for blocking the release her official White House records. Many suspect these records contain a treasure trove of information related to her role in a number of serious Clinton‑era scandals. Moreover, in March 2007, Judicial Watch filed an ethics complaint against Senator Clinton for filing false financial disclosure forms with the U.S. Senate (again). And Hillary’s top campaign contributor, Norman Hsu, was exposed as a felon and a fugitive from justice in 2007. Hsu pleaded guilt to one count of grand theft for defrauding investors as part of a multi‑million dollar Ponzi scheme.

CLINTON IS A MAJOR LA RAZA SUPPORTER AND ADVANCED BUSH’S BIT BY BIT AMNESTY ALONG WITH CHAIN MIGRATION WHICH IS CALCULATED TO DOUBLE THE 40 MILLION ILLEGALS ALREADY HERE.

CLINTON IS ALSO VERY MUCH IN BED WITH THE SAUDIS WHOM GAVE 10 MILLION TO BILL CLINTON’S LIBRARY. NO COMMENT ON THE FACT THE SAUDIS ARE MAJOR FINANCIERS OF TERRORISM, INCLUDING BOMBERS IN IRAQ KILLING OUR PEOPLE, OR THE SAUDI FUNDED WAHHABI SCHOOLS WHICH PROMOTE ULTRA‑FASCIST MUSLIM IDEOLOGIES.

*

2. Rep. John Conyers (D‑MI): Conyers reportedly repeatedly violated the law and House ethics rules, forcing his staff to serve as his personal servants, babysitters, valets and campaign workers while on the government payroll. While the House Ethics Committee investigated these allegations in 2006, and substantiated a number of the accusations against Conyers, the committee blamed the staff and required additional administrative record‑keeping and employee training. Judicial Watch obtained documentation in 2007 from a former Conyers staffer that sheds new light on the activities and conduct on the part of the Michigan congressman, which appear to be at a minimum inappropriate and likely unlawful. Judicial Watch called on the Attorney General in 2007 to investigate the matter.

3. Senator Larry Craig (R‑ID): In one of the most shocking scandals of 2007, Senator Craig was caught by police attempting to solicit sex in a Minneapolis International Airport men’s bathroom during the summer.

*

4. Senator Diane Feinstein (D‑CA): As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee's subcommittee on military construction, Feinstein reviewed military construction government contracts, some of which were ultimately awarded to URS Corporation and Perini, companies then owned by Feinstein's husband, Richard Blum. While the Pentagon ultimately awards military contracts, there is a reason for the review process. The Senate's subcommittee on Military Construction's approval carries weight. Sen. Feinstein, therefore, likely had influence over the decision making process. Senator Feinstein also attempted to undermine ethics reform in 2007, arguing in favor of a perk that allows members of Congress to book multiple airline flights and then cancel them without financial penalty. Judicial Watch’s investigation into this matter is ongoing.

DIANNE FEINSTEIN IS A MAJOR SUPPORTER OF OPEN BORDERS WITH MEXICO TO DEPRESS AMERICAN WAGES ON BEHALF OF HER CAMPAIGN DONORS, SUCH AS LA RAZA DONORS, BANK OF AMERICA AND WELLS FARGO.