If someone is so bent on the intent that this program has malicious code, then you guys know where to find Olly. Learn assembly and start exploring the code. Specifically for strings like wallet.dat.

When you don't find the malicious code, then come back and of course apologize to the developer.

I'm not sure if you're being serious, but assuming it was obfuscated even to a simple degree it would likely take weeks to disassemble and follow through the code to a degree you could be sure of what it does. Personally if I particularly wanted the functions I'd rather spend a day and write my own version. There's already a Javascript based Windows gadget floating around that's very easy to verify.

Take weeks? You sir need to leave this thread, you clearly don't belong if your making irrational assumptions. If you like that winGadget then use it.

The sole fact that anyone from this forum is going to bash a close source program JUST because there are open sourced programs makes you an ignorant prick by definition. I don't need anyone of you paramaniacs to even be in this thread. Your all lucky I can't stop certain people from coming in this thread because so far, only like 2-3 of you have actually defended my point versus the 20 other people who downloaded my app without complaining versus the ignorant pricks that rather claim my code as malicious.

If you REALLY think it's malicious based on the fact that I simply decide to continue to make software in closed source you all need to open your eyes. There is more closed source than open source. Now get out of my thread, I don't need you to progress what i'm doing.

//On a side note (to the people that read my posts + support my opinion, yeah, all two of you), The poker system is almost complete. I'm integrating Bitcoins,Bitpennies,Play bitcoins,Play bitpennies. Multiple converters to allow money deposits for both money and bitcoins as well as some other planned currencies. I'm also going to make a web interface so the maniacs of the internet can successfully eradicate me stealing wallet.dat's and bitcoins and all that jazz. But that's not it's main purpose. It would allow a user to configure their whole profile without having the program to run. I'm also making the worlds first reverse-connect poker system aswell, which will allow you to host your own tables (as servers on ports) + charge fees . Tournaments will take place within the system to allow free users with no deposit at all to make bitcoins and bitpennies. If that screams malicious then i'm probably in the wrong area of the internet.

I have every right to close source software I make just like anyone else. Everyone here, is just way too paranoid to realize they all use closed source software. People use WinRAR almost every day. It does a simple task of compressing a file JUST like WinAce and WinZIP which already come with windows. WinRAR has smaller functions that are widespread. Now tell me an open source program that kept it's same support team for over 2 years, plus made enough income to actually make it worth the time minus any donations.

You need to lose your illusions of grandeur. First you compared yourself to Microsoft and Apple (hahaha), and now you've "settled" for WinRAR. WinRAR, which has a cumulative number of hundreds of millions (if not billions) of downloads, has been around for nearly two decades, and is backed by a multi-million-dollar company.

You and Rarlab are nothing alike. Please understand that. I'm a Free Software guy. I love programs with available source code because, even if I don't ever personally inspect them, others have. But I'm not an ideologue. I run proprietary software too, including, yes, you guessed it, WinRAR. But WinRAR has earned a bit of trust in my regard. And would I download a new closed source tool by Microsoft if I thought it was useful? Yes, I would. Would I download a new closed source tool from a complete unknown that would have the potential to completely wipe out all of my Bitcoin holdings? No, I wouldn't.

FFS guy, you are not Microsoft, you are not Apple, you are not Rarlab, you are just some random guy on the Internet releasing software in an area with a high potential for risk and with an already existing history of fraud. You haven't earned anyone's trust. And yet you don't understand at all why people might want to see the source so they can make an evaluation for themselves of the software? Get over yourself.

Take weeks? You sir need to leave this thread, you clearly don't belong if your making irrational assumptions. If you like that winGadget then use it.

Your ability to imitate every blowhard that ever lived is astounding.

Quote

The sole fact that anyone from this forum is going to bash a close source program JUST because there are open sourced programs makes you an ignorant prick by definition.

LOL. You need to stop taking shit personally. It prevents you from listening and perhaps learning something.

Culture trumps features. There's plenty of you opportunists looking to drink the blood of this community. You can call us culturally conservative if you like.

Quote

I don't need anyone of you paramaniacs to even be in this thread. Your all lucky I can't stop certain people from coming in this thread because so far, only like 2-3 of you have actually defended my point versus the 20 other people who downloaded my app without complaining versus the ignorant pricks that rather claim my code as malicious.

No one claimed it was. They simply said we have a filter against abusers and we'll happily go elsewhere.

We are not driven by entertainment, distractions, ignorance of our environment. We care more about our culture than we do about petty product features. We will use less featured software if it promotes our culture. Deal with it. Stop assuming you deserve anything. All the time you or anyone spends on a product is nothing more than a bet, a bet that people give a shit about your product. Because if they don't give a shit, you bet that they might like it is irrelevant and wasted.

Quote

There is more closed source than open source. Now get out of my thread, I don't need you to progress what i'm doing.

And there's more Bonzo Buddy shit than there is productive software. I don't use it.

And the thread exists in our forum. You're a guest just like the rest of us douchebag.

Quote

The poker system is almost complete.

Translation: "Den I pick up some escort ladies in Vegas. Pahrtee down, Mon!"

Quote

I'm integrating Bitcoins,Bitpennies,Play bitcoins,Play bitpennies.

You're trading numbers between files. Genius. /sarcasm

Quote

Multiple converters to allow money deposits for both money and bitcoins as well as some other planned currencies.

Without a culture behind them, they're a flash in the pan. We move faster than you do.Come to think of it the more you tell us, the less source code we need, but go on. Your trolling days are over.

Quote

I'm also going to make a web interface so the maniacs of the internet can successfully eradicate me stealing wallet.dat's and bitcoins and all that jazz. But that's not it's main purpose. It would allow a user to configure their whole profile without having the program to run.

What again? You can write HTML? LOL. Guys bring this guy your virgin daughters to sacrifice on his e-altar. He's got teh HTMLs!

Quote

I'm also making the worlds first reverse-connect poker system aswell, which will allow you to host your own tables (as servers on ports) + charge fees . Tournaments will take place within the system to allow free users with no deposit at all to make bitcoins and bitpennies. If that screams malicious then i'm probably in the wrong area of the internet.

First, you keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.

I have every right to close source software I make just like anyone else. Everyone here, is just way too paranoid to realize they all use closed source software. People use WinRAR almost every day. It does a simple task of compressing a file JUST like WinAce and WinZIP which already come with windows. WinRAR has smaller functions that are widespread. Now tell me an open source program that kept it's same support team for over 2 years, plus made enough income to actually make it worth the time minus any donations.

You need to lose your illusions of grandeur. First you compared yourself to Microsoft and Apple (hahaha), and now you've "settled" for WinRAR. WinRAR, which has a cumulative number of hundreds of millions (if not billions) of downloads, has been around for nearly two decades, and is backed by a multi-million-dollar company.

You and Rarlab are nothing alike. Please understand that. I'm a Free Software guy. I love programs with available source code because, even if I don't ever personally inspect them, others have. But I'm not an ideologue. I run proprietary software too, including, yes, you guessed it, WinRAR. But WinRAR has earned a bit of trust in my regard. And would I download a new closed source tool by Microsoft if I thought it was useful? Yes, I would. Would I download a new closed source tool from a complete unknown that would have the potential to completely wipe out all of my Bitcoin holdings? No, I wouldn't.

FFS guy, you are not Microsoft, you are not Apple, you are not Rarlab, you are just some random guy on the Internet releasing software in an area with a high potential for risk and with an already existing history of fraud. You haven't earned anyone's trust. And yet you don't understand at all why people might want to see the source so they can make an evaluation for themselves of the software? Get over yourself.

You see there's smart enthusiasts. And than there are blind run-off-the-mill pricks like you. I'm not comparing ME to microsoft or apple or anyone else. I'm comparing the software rights if you payed ANY attention to any of this thread instead of just reading a post you could reply most efficiently to with your slim knowledge of simple acrovision.

The friggin idea of having closed source is my argument. I'm comparing my software to winrar because they are both closed source. What do you think winrar was automatically insanely more popular than winzip as SOON as it came out? Your pretty blind if all you base your downloading on is popular companies that make useful software. I know MANY software that smashes certain programs made by big companies and is made by a small developer, or just a guy that wants something done for themselves and spread it out. Do you think if a prick like you were around when the devs of WinRAR were just start out there would even be any commercial WinRAR product? I thought not. The basic idea of a developer starting somewhere is where you lack your obvious reasoning. The plain fact that you think i'm comparing myself, ME, one person, to commercial companies makes you look completely stupid. There is absolutely NO hint at that if you read all of my posts in this thread.

Furthermore, rarlabs started from the ground up. You probably weren't even alive since then by looking at your perspective of speech. I was, i knew the difficult process winrar had to go through to just get accepted because of people like you. If you want to act tough, do it elsewhere. Get out of my thread.

Take weeks? You sir need to leave this thread, you clearly don't belong if your making irrational assumptions. If you like that winGadget then use it.

Your ability to imitate every blowhard that ever lived is astounding.

Quote

The sole fact that anyone from this forum is going to bash a close source program JUST because there are open sourced programs makes you an ignorant prick by definition.

LOL. You need to stop taking shit personally. It prevents you from listening and perhaps learning something.

Culture trumps features. There's plenty of you opportunists looking to drink the blood of this community. You can call us culturally conservative if you like.

Quote

I don't need anyone of you paramaniacs to even be in this thread. Your all lucky I can't stop certain people from coming in this thread because so far, only like 2-3 of you have actually defended my point versus the 20 other people who downloaded my app without complaining versus the ignorant pricks that rather claim my code as malicious.

No one claimed it was. They simply said we have a filter against abusers and we'll happily go elsewhere.

We are not driven by entertainment, distractions, ignorance of our environment. We care more about our culture than we do about petty product features. We will use less featured software if it promotes our culture. Deal with it. Stop assuming you deserve anything. All the time you or anyone spends on a product is nothing more than a bet, a bet that people give a shit about your product. Because if they don't give a shit, you bet that they might like it is irrelevant and wasted.

Quote

There is more closed source than open source. Now get out of my thread, I don't need you to progress what i'm doing.

And there's more Bonzo Buddy shit than there is productive software. I don't use it.

And the thread exists in our forum. You're a guest just like the rest of us douchebag.

Quote

The poker system is almost complete.

Translation: "Den I pick up some escort ladies in Vegas. Pahrtee down, Mon!"

Quote

I'm integrating Bitcoins,Bitpennies,Play bitcoins,Play bitpennies.

You're trading numbers between files. Genius. /sarcasm

Quote

Multiple converters to allow money deposits for both money and bitcoins as well as some other planned currencies.

Without a culture behind them, they're a flash in the pan. We move faster than you do.Come to think of it the more you tell us, the less source code we need, but go on. Your trolling days are over.

Quote

I'm also going to make a web interface so the maniacs of the internet can successfully eradicate me stealing wallet.dat's and bitcoins and all that jazz. But that's not it's main purpose. It would allow a user to configure their whole profile without having the program to run.

What again? You can write HTML? LOL. Guys bring this guy your virgin daughters to sacrifice on his e-altar. He's got teh HTMLs!

Quote

I'm also making the worlds first reverse-connect poker system aswell, which will allow you to host your own tables (as servers on ports) + charge fees . Tournaments will take place within the system to allow free users with no deposit at all to make bitcoins and bitpennies. If that screams malicious then i'm probably in the wrong area of the internet.

First, you keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.

Wow, I can see that you analyze things individually without actually taking into account my overall point. The only people being malicious right now, is YOU, in my thread. gtfo.

I was about to gtfo until you called it your thread. Already we have people trying to hack this board. Whether it's fair or not that lowered your profile. Your use of my on a large board you're trolling just lowered it further.

Furthermore, rarlabs started from the ground up. You probably weren't even alive since then by looking at your perspective of speech. I was, i knew the difficult process winrar had to go through to just get accepted because of people like you. If you want to act tough, do it elsewhere. Get out of my thread.

What, do you want to see a birth certificate to prove that I was around then? Will the short-form certificate suffice, or are you going to go all birther on me and demand a long-form copy?

Furthermore, rarlabs started from the ground up. You probably weren't even alive since then by looking at your perspective of speech. I was, i knew the difficult process winrar had to go through to just get accepted because of people like you. If you want to act tough, do it elsewhere. Get out of my thread.

What, do you want to see a birth certificate to prove that I was around then? Will the short-form certificate suffice, or are you going to go all birther on me and demand a long-form copy?

Your claim isn't worth the time.

It's MY thread because I created it. And without me, there would be no thread of this name and value. Sure, the hosting company owns the space it's put on, but as it hasn't been deleted yet, it seems that ownership is still legitimate. To anyone owning a thread it's a valid reason that the thread they made is theirs.

It's MY thread because I created it. And without me, there would be no thread of this name and value. Sure, the hosting company owns the space it's put on, but as it hasn't been deleted yet, it seems that ownership is still legitimate. To anyone owning a thread it's a valid reason that the thread they made is theirs.

The name? no. The value? you really have trouble with that word, first. Your thread is not valuable as you think it is.

As for this my thing... The hosting company doesn't run the forum, the owners of the forum do.

Selling new threads for 5BTC each, polls available in limited quantities for an additional 2BTC.

The nice thing about all the other API monitors is that I can go in and change anything I want in order to suit my needs(for instance I would change the background,the spacing and the blurry text in your program).

I would have given your closed software a try anyway if you didn't come off so needlessly defensive.

Furthermore, rarlabs started from the ground up. You probably weren't even alive since then by looking at your perspective of speech. I was, i knew the difficult process winrar had to go through to just get accepted because of people like you. If you want to act tough, do it elsewhere. Get out of my thread.

What, do you want to see a birth certificate to prove that I was around then? Will the short-form certificate suffice, or are you going to go all birther on me and demand a long-form copy?

Your claim isn't worth the time.

It's MY thread because I created it. And without me, there would be no thread of this name and value. Sure, the hosting company owns the space it's put on, but as it hasn't been deleted yet, it seems that ownership is still legitimate. To anyone owning a thread it's a valid reason that the thread they made is theirs.

Dude.

No source = nobody is going to trust you. You have no reputation here. Further discussion is pointless.

We had enough scammers on this forum already. A lot of money got stolen...

I'm just gonna throw this out there, but writing a closed source app that DOES have access to ones wallet, the Poker app, is epic fail. Web pages are risky enough in that regard, but a full blown local app with wallet access by design (i can only assume wallet access, otherwise how is one going to get bitcoins into their "account" or whatever the poker client uses for betting) is never gonna fly. Especially when this product is released by someone who has so adamantly fought against earning community trust by opening up the code of his first bitcoin related app for viewing.

No one has asked you to change your license, you can in fact open source something and still retain all control over the source if you pick the right license. All we want (and i was pretty quiet until i heard about the poker app) is the ability to inspect the code, so we know its safe. Its dealing with our money. Would you install a third party application to your computer that dealt with your bank account? If so, you need to get off the internet. NAO

Your right. I couldn't care less what you guys think about the status of my program being closed or open source. It's closed. And it's not against ANY rules. So get out. Without a hosting company, this whole site as well as forum cannot exist where it is. And if someone manages to get it off of a hosting company, an ISP would manage it on the internet.