Where Islam spreads, freedom dies

I've written before about the French writer Renaud Camus who was dropped by his publishers after declaring his support for the Front National earlier this year. Here's an interview he gave recently to the Voice of Russia.

The committed writer Renaud Camus says clearly that France is in a war and that what the media call acts of violence or incivility are in fact acts of war waged against France and its civilisation.

Where do you see acts of war in France that recall the start of the war in Algeria?

What recalls the start of the war in Algeria is the extreme euphemisation of discourse imposed by the media-political complex. They would say “the events”, they say “the confrontations”. The territorial character of the conflict is denied completely.

Why do you feel anger against the media?

Because they impose (almost) unanimously a system of interpreting the world that is a formidable machine for not seeing, not saying, not understanding. Anti-racism, because that’s what it’s about, after it went from being morality to ideology, to indoctrination, to an instrument of power and repression, has become what I called, borrowing an expression from Alain Finkielkraut, the Communism of the 21st century. Supported by threats, it serves to dissimulate what is happening: that is to say the changing of people, the Great Replacement, the reverse colonisation.

Why did you found a political party?

Because there wasn’t one that was responding to the urgency of the situation and was calling out what was happening, the conquest of territory. Yes, there was the Front National which at least seemed aware of the reality of things, but the presence of Jean-Marie Le Pen at the head of it, at the time, prevented me getting closer to it, much less joining it.

Why did your publishing houses cancel your contract?

You should really ask them…

Has France been a country of immigration for centuries?

Absolutely not. That is one of the most cynical inventions of the collaborationist historiography, in the service of the do-gooder party. Between the 6th and 20th centuries, the components of the French population were stable. The first wave of immigration appears at the end of the 19th century, but it’s still an immigration of individuals who could be assimilated easily in one or two generations because they were from the same civilisation, Christian and European: Belgians, Italians, Poles. Mass immigration only starts in the last third of the 20th century and very quickly it’s no longer a question of integration because even if France has always been able to integrate individuals, it cannot integrate peoples, especially when they belong to civilisations that are completely foreign to ours and often hostile.

Is there a need to create a government of Free French forces on the model of De Gaulle?

We’re not there yet. Vast parts of the territory are still under the control of the national government. The problem is that it is itself largely in the hands of people who are unaware or cynical, who accommodate themselves very well to the colonisation that is underway or who support it.

Are we seeing a rewriting of the history of France?

Ah that, totally. It has been hugely favoured by the Great Deculturation, the collapse of the education system, the teaching of forgetfulness, the stupour industry.

Why do the North African populations want to come to France at any price given that they chased France out of their countries?

When the Russians chased the French out of Russia in 1812 they pursued them all the way to Paris. But they only stayed two or three years there. And they were an army, not a people.

Is France like Kosovo with Muslim, African and Christian zones?

Modern France is doing its utmost to become what classical France did its best to avoid being for centuries, an ex-Yugoslavia, the Balkans, another Lebanon, a basket of crabs.

...The immigrants say they are more French than the French and call the French “souchiens” or “sous-chiens” [play on words meaning both ‘indigenes’ and ‘sub-dogs’]. Does that shock you?

It may be true that a few thousand of them love France more than its deculturated indigenes. For the rest, it’s just a territorial claim – it only confirms me in my thoughts: that a conquest is underway, by colonisation of settlement.

What do you think of humanitarian organisations like MRAP that prohibit discussion of the facts?

That they are helpers who have a stake in the Great Replacement.

The fact that Putin bans such organisations in Russia, is that a good idea?

18
comments:

Anonymous
said...

Bretagne (local mayor?)wearing the colors of Bretagne- and not those of France as would be

"Is there a need to create a government of Free French forces on the model of De Gaulle?

We’re not there yet. Vast parts of the territory are still under the control of the national government. The problem is that it is itself largely in the hands of people who are unaware or cynical, who accommodate themselves very well to the colonisation that is underway or who support it. "

This happened at an occasion where the man in question was not content with the decisions central authorities, so he demonstrated his distance by instead of decorating himself with the ordinary French band across the shoulder, but took out one in black and white with the Bretagne symbols

(The occasion may have been one to do with constructing national roads)

I thought this was remarkable and it made you wonder whether this could be one of the first signs of a part of France on its way to breaking off from the republique.

Bretagne has a history of independence before it was forced in under France.

(Anne de Bretagne, last duchesse of independent Bretagne, if you want to look up history)

"The Great Replacement is well underway here too. At no point in the history of humanity have we experienced a phenomenon so bizarre: all these peoples who, rendered numb and passive by a necrotic ideology, are allowing themselves to be replaced by others in a continuous flood. One might say that they don't know what is happening to them, that they don't want to see, that they refuse to take note of the fact that, individual by individual, they are disappearing, replaced, replaced, replaced.

They live in the mad fiction that others are the same, that there is no difference, that all it takes to make a people, the same people as the themselves, is to be there. Here in Ibsen, this small provincial Norwegian town, you can't take a step without coming across women veiled from head to toe."

Muslims are renowned for not tolerating anything that even may upset them, or their cultural norms. While we OTH are prepared to Tolerate everything. Moreover there is continuous propaganda that ours is a culture of TOLERANCE.

Given abundant evidence that is the case, authorities will always side with Muslims, as that is the way to have social peace.

Therefore the way forward is to oppose Islam on the streets and squares. This is what the EDL has started, and this is why the authorities are so worried. They know that Muslims cannot be changed, as Islam cannot be changed. So they attack the EDL with all the force they can summon. They have to stop the EDL or else civil war is a reality.

Despite EDL, I believe that it will be France or the French Defence League or a variant, that will make the Pushback. When that happens, it will get ugly. The authorities will then side with the French, as they full know the consequence - "Guillotine".

Germany, hampered by its Nazi past, will then take courage, and in the interest of European communitaire, follow the French example.

In the meantime, the traitor elite are desperately trying to achieve population replacement before the war really starts.

PS: When Reconquista really starts, no one will give a tinkers for Human Rights and other fine points of law and behaviour.