3/11/05 - the silent coordinated intimidation attack on the American Government

3/11/05 - the silent coordinated intimidation attack on the American Government

March 11th 2005, which marked the first anniversary of the Madrid train bombings, saw the least noticed but most significant terror attack on US soil
since 9/11. The attackers simultaneously hit two branches of the government, a third being hit exactly one month later on April 11th.

First, Brian Nichols shot and killed Federal judge Rowland Barnes in his Atlanta Georgia court room. He killed 3 other people before being caught. On
the same day, 2 pentagon mail sorting facilities reported positive tests for Anthrax contamination. On April 11th, a man dressed in black and
carrying two suitcases showed up at the Capitol and asked to see the President.

Afterwards he was unresponsive until he was arrested by Capitol Police who feared he was a suicide bomber.

The attacks were not meant to cause physical damage, but merely to intimidate those who were in a position to be aware of their meaning. Only one of
these three coordinated strikes received significant media coverage.

Intimidation attack on the Judiciary branch of the US government, March 11 2005: In late february 2005, the husband and mother of federal judge Joan
Lefkow were murdered in her Chicago home. The presumed murderer later committed suicide as he was being stopped by police. This
high profile case ensured that the media and public were atuned to what was to follow. On March 11th 2005, Brian Nichols shot and killed Judge
Rowland Barnes. He killed two other people at the courthouse and later killed US Customs officer David Wilhelm in a different part of town. This
pattern bears more than a passing resemblance to LH Oswald's murder of Officer JD Tippit in the hours following the JFK assassination. There has
never been a satisfactory explanation for how Nichols was able to escape the courthouse and remain at large for more than 2 days. edition.cnn.com...

Intimidation attack on the military arm of the Executive branch of the US government, March 11 2005: On March 11th 2005, a contractor for the Pentagon
reported contaminated mail at two sorting facilities. The items would have arrived on the March 10th. Within a few days, further testing showed that
a) the items in question were positive for Anthrax of the same strain as in the 9/11 attacks, and b) the mail facilities themselves were free of
Anthrax. This led to the conclusion that the contractor had somehow contaminated the samples. Interestingly, it has proven difficult to find out
which entity first reported the contamination, as the investigation became lost in a maze of contractors and sub-contractors. www.military.com...

Intimidation attack on the legislative branch of the US government, April 11th 2005: A fake suicide bomber, dressed as a Matrix character, terrorizes
the Capitol building www.cbsnews.com

Analysis: There is an element, possibly within the US government, that is sending coded messages to judges, lawmakers, and the military. These
messages are intelligible because their timing fits into the general 3/11 framework used by that element at least since GHWB's New World Order speech
on 9/11/90, and possibly earlier. There are individuals in all three branches of the US government who are aware of this code and who would be
specially sensitive to events on days that fit the expected pattern. This would be especially true since the demonstration event of 9/11/01, the New
Pearl Harbour.

The concerted terror attacks on 3/11/05 may have constituted a warning to various elements of the government in the run-up to the vote to extend the
Patriot Act and to various court challenges to that Act. Note that the House approved the Patriot Act renewal on 7/22/05. Twenty-two is a multiple
of 11, and 7+22=29, 2+9 being 11 (edition.cnn.com...). The senate voted on 7/29/05, 2+9=11, 7+2+9=18, 1+8=9, 18
is also a multiple of 9.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.