Available Case Documents

ORDER THAT THE PARTIES HAVE FILED MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. SEE DOC. 496 498 500 505 AND FOR THE REASONS DESCRIBED AT LENGTH IN THE MEMORANDUM FILED WITH THIS ORDER, IT IS ORDERED THE PARTIES' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ARE DENIED, EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPHS TWO THROUGH FOUR, BELOW AND AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 9/30/16. 9/30/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(gs)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT AND RECONSIDERATION (DOC. 443) IS DENIED. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY (DOC. 462) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 9/21/15. 9/21/15 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT FENKELL PARTIES' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 267) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 8/19/15. 8/21/15 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 231 ) IS DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 6/12/2015. 6/12/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. 322) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 4/13/15. 4/14/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(rf, )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DAVID AND KAREN FENKELL'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS (DOC. 176) IS DENIED AS OUTLINED HEREIN.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 12/5/14. 12/5/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(rf, )

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT DAVID B. FENKELL'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY (DOC. NO. 178) IS DENIED. OTHER INSTRUCTIONS ARE AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 11/24/2014. 11/25/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(jmg, )

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.