Tuesday, September 08, 2015

I’ve written multiple
blogs explaining how the sharing economy provides access to services and income
that many people would not have otherwise. This access increases the standard
of living of all sharing economy users, but it has an even greater beneficial impact on low-income users compared to high-income
users. (See here and here.) Free State
Foundation scholars also discussed this important economic effect in our comments to the
Federal Trade Commission back in May 2015.

In a follow-up blog, Mr. Meyer
discusses the popularity of UberX (Uber’s lowest-cost, non-luxury, and most
frequently used service) in poor neighborhoods:

The largest increase in UberX
rides from January 2014 to December 2014 was seen in zip codes with
below-median incomes. Seven of the 11 zip codes outside core Manhattan (below
Central Park North) that saw their numbers of rides grow by over 1,000% have
below-median incomes.

Over the course of 2014, the
historically low-income neighborhoods of Jackson Heights, Astoria, Harlem and
Washington Heights all saw increases in UberX trips of over 1,200% — that’s
more than 12 fold.

Mr. Meyer also disputes the
stereotype that Uber is not popular in predominately black communities: “In the 29 zip codes outside of core Manhattan with one
or more UberX pick-up per household during 2014, black households made up an
average of 29% of households, while the average for all zip codes outside of
core Manhattan was 27%.”

Mr.
Meyer argues that NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio’s theory that Uber trips are
creating congestion is exaggerated because in 2014 “there were around 175
million annual yellow taxi trips, and just under 9.5 million UberX trips.”

I think it’s fair to say that Uber and other ridesharing companies are having
a positive impact in New York for people of all backgrounds, ethnicities, and
income levels. Mayor de Blasio should take note of this report and encourage
Uber’s growth, not attempt to restrict it as he has tried in the past. (See
this blog for more.)