RECEIVERS ARE to take control of housebuilder McInerney on behalf of three banks owed €113 million after the Supreme Court yesterday ruled against a rescue plan for the business backed by US private equity fund Oaktree Capital.

The ruling ends the process that began last August when the High Court appointed Bill O’Riordan of PricewaterhouseCoopers as examiner to five of the group’s Irish firms, and lifts the protection from creditors given to the business at that point.

As a result, three banks – Anglo Irish, Bank of Ireland and KBC – are to appoint receivers, said to be accountancy firm KPMG, to the firms. The banks had proposed to regain their debt through a 10-year receivership, during which the companies’ sites would be developed and the houses sold.

Meanwhile, the board of their parent, McInerney Holdings plc, will go ahead with an extraordinary general meeting next Friday, where it will ask shareholders to place that entity in liquidation. Its British and Spanish operations have been sold and the proceeds used to pay other bank debts.

The rescue plan involved an offer of €25 million from Oaktree to the banks in final settlement of the debt. The US fund was prepared to invest up to €54 million, including the bank settlement, in the Irish business, which it believed had a long-term future.

The High Court refused to approve the proposal earlier this year as it unfairly prejudiced the interests of Belgian lender KBC.

The court also dismissed the banks’ cross-appeal against the decision of Mr Justice Frank Clarke to allow the High Court case to be reopened after he had decided all three banks would be prejudiced by the rescue plan.

Mr Justice Clarke revisited his decision after being told there was a likelihood the National Asset Management Agency would take over the loans to McInerney from the two Irish banks. In his final decision, he ruled, the plan would be unfairly prejudicial to KBC but, even where a rescue plan was unfairly prejudicial to only one party, it remained unfairly prejudicial.

In his 74-page judgment, Mr Justice O’Donnell said McInerney had failed to show the receivership model would not have the prospect of a return of significantly more than €25 million and also failed to show the proposals were not unfairly prejudicial to the secured creditors. The High Court was correct in concluding it could not approve the proposals, he said.

There was something fundamentally implausible in the companies’ vehement claims the receivership-controlled work out would generate a return of only €18 million – or might incur losses of €11 million, he added.

Mr Justice O’Donnell said he believed acquisition by Nama of some of the McInerney loans would involve payment to the banks of something more than present-day market value of the properties involved. The companies also failed to show KBC would not do better under that than under the rescue scheme.

McInerney’s directors said afterwards they were disappointed at the ruling. They pointed out it meant a €54 million investment that would have saved 100 jobs and resulted in a €2 million payment to trade creditors, could not now go ahead.

It was “highly regrettable that the banks were unwilling to reach an accommodation with the investor and that a company such as McInerney, capable of attracting such a substantial foreign investment in this manner, should be allowed fail,” they said.

CREDIT CARD

Texts

3,500 householders across England and Wales were pursued for bankruptcy or made bankrupt by town halls last year.

Privacy Policy (site specific)

Privacy Policy (site specific)Privacy Policy :This blog may from time to time collect names and/or details of website visitors. This may include the mailing list, blog comments sections and in various sections of the Connected Internet site.These details will not be passed onto any other third party or other organisation unless we are required to by government or other law enforcement authority.If you contribute content, such as discussion comments, to the site, your contribution may be publicly displayed including personally identifiable information.Subscribers to the mailing list can unsubscribe at any time by writing to info (at) copsandbloggers@googlemail.com. This site links to independently run web sites outside of this domain. We take no responsibility for the privacy practices or content of such web sites.This site uses cookies to save login details and to collect statistical information about the numbers of visitors to the site.We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and would like to know your options in relation to·not having this information used by these companies, click hereThis site is suitable for all ages, but not knowingly collect personal information from children under 13 years old.This policy will be updated from time to time. If we make significant changes to this policy after that time a notice will be posted on the main pages of the website.

Site Specific Privacy Policy run in accordance with http://www.google.com/privacy.htmlWe can be reached via e-mail atcopsandbloggers@googlemail.comFor each visitor to our Web page, our Web server automatically recognizes information of your browser, IP address, City/State/Country.We collect only the domain name, but not the e-mail address of visitors to our Web page, the e-mail addresses of those who communicate with us via e-mail.The information we collect is used for internal review and is then discarded, used to improve the content of our Web page, used to customize the content and/or layout of our page for each individual visitor.With respect to cookies: We use cookies to store visitors preferences, record user-specific information on what pages users access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors' browser type or other information that the visitor sends.With respect to Ad Servers: To try and bring you offers that are of interest to you, we have relationships with other companies like Google (www.google.com/adsense) that we allow to place ads on our Web pages. As a result of your visit to our site, ad server companies may collect information such as your domain type, your IP address and clickstream information. For further information, consult the privacy policy of:http://www.google.com/privacy.htmlcopsandbloggers@googlemail.comIf you feel that this site is not following its stated information policy, you may contact us at the above email address.