Self-represented Appellant M. Stacey Palmer (inclusive of M. Stacey Palmer Trust) has moved that the court grant a Petition for Rehearing Schedule Delay to January 20, 2014 for that otherwise due as of January 15, 2014, Pro Se Appellant acknowledges that four opposing parties and a substantive case spanning more than a decade require additional time to the ends of a succinct presentation of the issues at hand.

While the CITY & C&H parties are unopposed to this Motion for Schedule Delay; AFM has not responded and Mr. Cutts response is that Perren opposes the Schedule tor Motion Delay.

Good cause appearing therefor IT IS hereby ORDERED that the DUE DATE for the Petition for Rehearing be changed from ...

Our website includes the first part of the main text of the court's opinion.
To read the entire case, you must purchase the decision for download. With purchase,
you also receive any available docket numbers, case citations or footnotes, dissents
and concurrences that accompany the decision.
Docket numbers and/or citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a
legal proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision. If the document contains a simple affirmation or denial without discussion,
there may not be additional text.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.