Welcome to the Piano World Piano ForumsOver 2 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

I've just gotten an exciting request from my piano professor. He wants me to give a full length recital at the end of the year because of the progress that I've made so far. I have several pieces in my repertoire right now, but I have no idea how to make a cohesive program out of them. Pieces that I've learned so far this semester include:

Now, I'll be learning another 1-2 hours worth of music next semester, but I wouldn't want to perform it then. Do you all think that there's a decent program amongst all of these vastly different pieces? I was thinking maybe:

I would perform at least some of what you're learning next semester because of the time involved with maintaining and bringing your old stuff up to your new level. 1-2 hours of new music plus putting on a recital is would take too much practice time.

She did it with No. 12. I think it works because they work very well as overtures. Pieces that allow the audience to relax and get into the zone without having to concentrate too hard as the music isn't particularly profound or sophisticated. If you listen to Lisitsa's preconcert talk I think she justifies her choice very well.

She did it with No. 12. I think it works because they work very well as overtures. Pieces that allow the audience to relax and get into the zone without having to concentrate too hard as the music isn't particularly profound or sophisticated. If you listen to Lisitsa's preconcert talk I think she justifies her choice very well.

Yes, she played it as a 'prelude' to her main course, in order to allow photographers to click and flash away so that when the serious stuff got underway (starting with Mozart), everyone would be settled down. The HR was left out of the CD because of the noisy clicking, but it's on the DVD.

Lang Lang did the same when he appeared on stage at a rock venue, engulfed by fake smoke.....(goodness knows how he still played all the right notes.... ).

_________________________
"I don't play accurately - anyone can play accurately - but I play with wonderful expression. As far as the piano is concerned, sentiment is my forte. I keep science for Life."

I wanted to make sure I opened with something that's easy to swallow, like the Rach. I know that it's popular to open with a prelude and fugue, but I've never understood why. Why is this such a common practice?

#1987416 - 11/16/1211:00 AMRe: The order of pieces for a recital
[Re: DonaldLee]

pianoloverus
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Registered: 05/29/01
Posts: 20371
Loc: New York City

Originally Posted By: DonaldLee

I wanted to make sure I opened with something that's easy to swallow, like the Rach. I know that it's popular to open with a prelude and fugue, but I've never understood why. Why is this such a common practice?

Probably because for a long time many recitals were more or less done in historical order. That's not so popular now and perhaps considered old fashioned, but I'm not sure your pieces work in some other order(obviously just my opinion). I think the problem with playing a single short piece by one composer is that it makes the program look like a grab bag of pieces with no unity. It's extremely rare in my recital going experience to hear a program with a single short piece a composer.