Week in Review

Hardcore feminists hate the institution of marriage. Unless it’s same-sex marriage. Then marriage is the greatest thing in the world. But when it’s the union of a man and a woman that’s another story. For all that the institution of marriage does is reduce the woman to a second-class citizen. A piece of property. Human property. A cook in the kitchen. A maid. And a whore in the bedroom. To serve their husbands disgusting sexual desires. Some militant feminists have gone so far as to call sex in marriage rape. Except for same-sex marriages, of course. Then it’s a beautiful expression of love between two people.

To make these feminists happy all married women should deny their husbands any sexual pleasure. They should be sexually abstinent. They should be asexual. So they are not a sexual object for their husbands’ depravity. But on the other hand, if they’re single women then they should explore every part of their sexuality. To enjoy every sexual pleasure there is no matter the social norm or taboo they break. To objectify whatever part of their bodies to pleasure a man. Outside of marriage that’s called empowerment. While inside a marriage it’s called rape. Unless it’s a same-sex marriage, of course. Feminists at a university are even helping young college women objectify, I mean, empower themselves (see Consent kits given to Vancouver students by Ada Slivinski posted 3/19/2014 on Vancouver 24 Hurs).

Bright pink boxes created by the Women’s Centre at Simon Fraser University are being distributed to spread the word about sexual consent and counter what is often termed “rape culture.”

Louise Mapleston, who represents the centre, said the initiative is about “making sure that when people have sex, they are feeling comfortable and they’re 100% excited.”

The package contains a condom, lubricant and a sexual Mad Lib, in which students can fill in the blanks of what form of sexual interaction they would like to engage in…

The Women’s Centre is run by a collective of volunteers and staff. The group self-identifies as pro-feminist, sex-positive, pro-choice, trans and intersex inclusive and anti-racist.

What form of sexual interaction they would like to engage in? Would this work in marriage, too? Would the sex inside of marriage not be rape if the wife filled out a sexual Mad Lib first?

Sex inside a marriage is a beautiful expression of love between two people. Casual sex with a random person is not. It is a physical experience only with no emotional connection. It’s just a hookup. Where guys can go from woman to woman depending on their tastes for the night. The girl next door? A cheerleader-type perhaps? Black? White? Asian? Hispanic. So many options. Thanks to all of those women empowering themselves.

And for the woman looking to get married and settle down to raise a family good luck. With the hookup culture so prevalent guys can satisfy their lust and then hang out with their friends. As the hookup culture has objectified women like nothing else. It’s so bad that a lot of men see no need to get married. For whenever they feel a sexual urge all they need to do is to hook up with some random woman. Satisfy that urge. And get back to something they enjoy. Hanging with the guys. As the hookup culture has made women good for only one thing to a lot of men. And it’s not marriage. Or even spending time with a woman in a nonsexual way.