sabato 19 maggio 2012

A nasty wind is blowing, it’s useless to hide
it. So nasty that a certain worry even spreads among the fine souls of
the left, and the establishment of a "dictatorship" by the current
government is denounced in an increasingly vehement manner. It is true,
on the right they have never forgotten their traditional inclination for
castor oil and the cudgel, but the fact remains that repression,
censure and prohibition are the bread that every form of government
administers to us, no matter what it is. In reality, beyond the
political faction momentarily charged with administering it, it is this
one-way world that requires a one-way life, made from a one-way thought
and one-way behavior… in an authentic coherence of abjection. Up to the
point of placing a ban on any critique, any dissent, any opposition, all
of which are punctually isolated, circumscribed, slandered, suffocated,
locked up, wherever they show themselves.

It would be sufficient to take a quick look at
what is happening in the latest period pretty much all over Italy.
Within the "movement", investigations, arrests, detentions, searches,
beatings and intimidation are spreading farther and farther and reaching
practically everyone, from the hot heads to the coldest passing through
the tepid. The prison doors open to all: it is enough to be accused of
an attack, or of having formed yet another subversive association, or of
having hindered an identification or a police roundup, or of having
removed an infiltrator from a demonstration, or of having participated
in a vigil, or of having occupied a building; and soon even the mere
accusation of coloring shop windows that overflow with commodities will
be reason enough for ending up behind bars. At the same time, the
authorities run through the thousands of possibilities furnished by the
penal code in order to block every form of activity, freely dealing out
expulsion orders and prohibiting entrance into cities to comrades
residing in small neighboring villages (charming modern version
sweetened from the old forced residence). Easy to foresee the increase
of such repressive practices.
But more importantly, it is not only the movement – in its multiple
shades – that the repression is aimed at, but rather it is society in
its totality that is suffering a tight turn of the screw. The
prohibition of criticism to the presence of Italian troops in Iraq has
reached staggering levels: a soccer field was disqualified because the
fans of the team that played there did not show the proper sorrow for
the soldiers who died at Nassiriya; some underage students, guilty of
having hung banners against the war, were dragged into a barracks and
interrogated; other students who distributed a flyer had their houses
searched; the shutting down of an information site like Indymedia was
requested in parliament because it has hosted voices outside of the
nationalist chorus. More generally, entire schools are passed through
the sieve in search of drugs; foreigners possibly suspected of anything
are expelled from the country in a few hours; hundreds of them are
thrown out of their home in the middle of winter; satirical television
shows are censored for being too satirical… and one could go on.
Unfortunately, the examples are not lacking. On the contrary, they are
increasing with a certain progression, like the furious reaction to the
transit strike in Milan that left the city on foot for a day: if on the
right a harsh punishment was invoked for the strikers, on the left there
are those who call for the intervention of the army [to operate the
streetcars] in the case of a new interruption of service. And it is easy
to imagine what will happen as the new laws on drugs begin to be
applied.
In the face of this, public discussion seems truly urgent to us, before every space for talk or action is forbidden to us.
Let’s start with a premise. The fact that today everyone who is not
quick to spring to attention ends up in the sights of repression means
that the division between the "good" to comfort and the "bad" to beat up
has had its day. This will certainly not serve to unite the different
spirits of the movement – with the permission of so many ecumenicists –
divided by something quite different than the grade in conduct on the
report card of the state, but it could contribute to the sweeping away
of an old and insipid commonplace that is unfortunately widespread, the
one according to which repression would be equivalent to a certificate
of radicality: "I am repressed, therefore I am". The conviction that
leads some people to believe that the more one is repressed the more one
is, in a delirium of self-congratulations that in any case overflows in
sacrifice. It is obvious that, at the moment in which repression is
extending itself to every sector of society, it becomes ridiculous to
think that it only strikes those who attack the security of the state.
This means that, contrary to what the mob leaders of the various
militant rackets think, the increase in repression does not, in fact,
correspond to the growth of the revolutionary threat of the movement or
any of its components. To be honest, it seems to us that the movement,
meant in its broadest sense, is reaching one of its lowest points,
everyone busy on the one hand with getting their share of the media and
institutional pie and on the other hand with thrashing about in a
chronic lack of perspective. The explosion of Genoa itself, which
happened over two years ago, seems to us to be more due to an ensemble
of circumstances, realized above all at the international level, than to
a supposed maturity reached by the movement here in Italy (the flow
that immediately followed from it give evidence of this).
But then, if the movement in itself is not really so strong, so
dangerous for the sleep of their lordships, why are we witnessing this
continual repetition of arrests and intimidations? In our opinion, it is
because the social situation in its totality is now so weak and fragile
as to not allow the ruling class to run too many risks. The edifice is
still standing in all its monumental grandeur, but its foundations
become more and more putrescent and the creaking gets louder and louder.
As if to say that that we are not repressed because we are strong,
decidedly not, but rather because they are weak. To be clear, we are not
saying that this social order is not able to impose its will or that it
is militarily vulnerable or any other such thing. Only that it advances
more due to a motion of inertia than a propulsive action, resting more
on a passive resignation than on an active consensus, in a context so
lacerated that it is unable to guarantee any enduring stability
whatsoever. In short, precariousness is even afflicting the ruling
order. Aware of its own weakness, it finds itself constrained to raise
its voice and intimidate its enemies, real or presumed as they may be;
it does it now, because it can still take the liberty to do so. This
leads it to exaggerate every event with the aim of creating alarmism
capable of publicly justifying measures that would otherwise not be able
to be proposed, and also of provoking the panic necessary for a shred
of security capable of encouraging it.
As we have already said, this great barking of the guard dogs of
power indeed strikes fear, but it also denotes a certain fragility. This
should make us reflect on the possibilities that open before us, on how
to outwit these mastiffs with the aim of laying hands on what they
protect. Instead, it seems to us that the barking is becoming an
obsession for too many comrades, leading some people to occupy
themselves with exclusively with healing the wounds inflicted by their
bites, and some people to challenge them for the pleasure of the
conflict or because they aren’t able to see beyond this. We want to
point out how in both cases, a decline in our objectives takes place,
and thus also in our practice, as our aim is modified, changing from the
struggle against the existent to the struggle against the forces that
defend it. Is it the same thing? No, it is not without confusing cause
and effect. Fighting and defending oneself against the forces of order
does not in itself and for itself mean subverting the dominant social
relationships. And at a time when these social relationships are
particularly unstable, this is where we need to focus our attention, our
theoretical and practical critique, avoiding as much as possible being
driven by the conditioned reflex provoked by repression. Because
otherwise we end up abandoning the fertile but unknown terrain of social
conflict in order to take up a defensive position in the sterile but
well-known terrain of opposition between us and them, between comrades
and cops, in a conflict rich in spectators but poor in accomplices.
Now, with the mere act of investigating and arresting, the state
manages to give someone who is repressed the illusion of being
dangerous, of already doing something concrete, for this very reason. It
gives all of us the fatal illusion of being strong , the illusion that
our struggling is meaningful, whereas, in reality it is extremely weak
(even if potentially harmful for the ruling order). In this way, we can
claim to be satisfied with our activity, however lacking it may be,
without asking ourselves how to improve it, dismissing every critical
debate, because often they are considered a waste of time. Besides, as
is well-known, repression puts the movement on the defensive; it leads
us all to have to occupy ourselves with arrested comrades, finding
lawyers, collecting money, organizing demonstrations in front of
prisons, attending hearings. Even those who have recourse to the most
extreme practices of protest, like the sending of mail bombs, don’t
escape this logic: the state against the movement, the movement against
the state in a frantic succession of arrests, protests against the
arrests that lead to new arrests, that lead to new protests that lead to
new arrests,… Yes, they are repressing us all. But can we claim that we
are dangerous because of this? Or is all the repression that is coming
down on the movement nothing but a way of preventing us from truly
becoming so?
Perhaps there is a need to clarify some questions. The material
support for those who end up in prison, a sad eventuality that is
becoming more and more concrete for everyone and that would merit
greater consideration, is and must remain a technical problem. The
question of what we desire to do against this intolerable world is of
quite another nature. As cruel as it may seem, it is necessary to reject
the moral blackmail that is launched every time a comrade is arrested.
There is no obligation of solidarity with which one must comply. No one
ends up in prison in place of those who are outside, and no one is
outside of prison thanks to those who are inside. Even though their
liberation is one of our principle preoccupations, we should not let it
become the end to which everything is subordinated, we should not give
up running because someone who stands with us has been stopped. Rather
we should dedicate ourselves to acting to create the conditions for
their liberation and for that of others, not fixing our gaze and
attention on what we see immediately before us, but making ourselves
unpredictable, not being obsessed with the dates established in advance,
but establishing our own for ourselves. Our agenda should not be traced
either on that of the government, or that of the judicial system, or
even less that of the various political grouplets that chase after the
spotlight of notoriety. In short, rather than stopping to find ourselves
before the walls of a prison to demand the release of those who are
locked up there, it would be better to go on ever stronger and in all
directions. Not only because this is the best way for expressing our
solidarity with them, since the awareness that there are those who
continue along the path that has been undertaken is more comforting than
a noisy greeting; but above all because it is the way to show the
uselessness of such arrests to those who order and execute them.
This is why we think that the best way to discuss what to do against
repression, aside from any possible consideration and agreement of a
technical type, really consists in constantly questioning ourselves
about what to do in order to damage this society in its totality and in
finding answers in the course of action. Because it is true that a nasty
wind is blowing, there is no use in hiding it. But it is also true that
if we truly desire the unleashing of the tempest, the problem of the
wind that blows can only be a false problem.

INCONTROLABLES: CONTRIBUCIONES PARA UN NIHILISMO CONSCIENTE

¡Mauricio Morales Presente!

Συναυλία Οικονομικής Ενίσχυσης για άνοιγμα στεκιού στο γαλάτσι

Download now for free from Actforfreedomnow! A collection of letters, texts and communiques from the armed group ‘ Revolutionary Struggle’ and their accused. Released during their current trial and intended to be one more nail in the coffin of the legitimacy of the State and the capitalist system.

Letters from Anarchist Prisoners of the "Bombs Case" in Chile

This document is a collection of letters from the Chilean anarchist “Bombs Case” prisoners, in an effort to share and spread their ideas beyond the prison walls. On August 14th, 2010, fourteen anarchists and anti-authoritarians were arrested in a series of raids in Santiago in what became known as the `Bombs Case`. They were accused of a series of bombings against capital and the state that took place around Santiago in the previous years, as well as of “criminal conspiracy” under the Pinochet-era Anti-Terrorist Laws. Since then, following a hunger strike by the prisoners, as well as countless solidarity actions from around the world, the charges against nine of the accused have been dropped (one of these people is facing other charges in a separate trial), but charges against five comrades remain. They are: Omar Hermosilla and Carlos Riveros, accused of providing the money to finance the costs of the attacks, as well as Mónica Caballero, Felipe Guerra, Francisco Solar, accused of the placement of the explosive devices at different points in Santiago. The trial started on November 28, 2011. Prisoners kidnapped by the State to the street! click the cover PDF