Episodes

Article Info

Tagged as:

139: Greg Kearney: Mormonism & Masonry

Today I sit down with Greg Kearney. Greg is both a Mormon and a Mason and today we discuss the connection between the two in the LDS Endowment. Many Latter-Day Saints are caught off guard when they discover that the LDS Endowment is very interconnected with Masonry and its ritual. Today we address this connection and other influences of Masonry on Mormonism.

2 thoughts on “139: Greg Kearney: Mormonism & Masonry”

I loved this podcast and I would love for you to do another one on this topic. If Joesph Smith isn’t using or borrowing ANY outside sources for the translation of the Book of Mormon then why is he using and borrowing from a fourteenth centre fraternity for a saving ordinance? This is my largest problem, and I do understand that maybe it was needed for the saints to learn the ordinance in a way that was familiar to them but it still bothers me that he can’t get “original” ritualistic revelation from God like he did with the Book of Mormon.

For me nothing none of Kearney’s reasoning as to why we find a pagan ritual in god’s holy temple makes any sense. In fact Greg’s reasoning falls far short of the Church’s restoration claims. Show me another ordinance where Mormonism separates the ritual element of their ordinance from the rest. Did the Christians of old use a different prayer for baptism (3 Nephi 11:25)? No only is the prayer identical, but if someone’s toe sticks out of the water during the baptism, that ordinance must be repeated. There are witnesses and helpers to ensure that the ritual is done correctly, Confirmation and ordinations must be done by laying on of hands which is of itself a ritual. Was the administration of the sacrament different in ancient times (Moroni chapter 4)? No it wasn’t. In fact Moroni taught “The manner of their elders and priests administering the flesh and blood of Christ unto the church; and they administered it according to the commandments of Christ; wherefore we know the manner to be true; and the elder or priest did minister it”. Moroni is referring to more than just the promise, but the entire ritual. When you combine Kearney’s nonsensical rationalization and place that on top of that all the early Church’s leader’s claim about the Masonic Endowment being a restoration of god’s ordinances, it remains very destructive to their truth claims.

Brigham Young claimed revelation when he wrote the ordinance down in 1870, and the Church continues that claim of restoration when they assert “we can also receive essential ordinances in behalf of ancestors who died without having the opportunity to receive these ordinances for themselves.” How can our ancestors receive this ordinance that didn’t even exist, ever? Meaning, that Jesus, the apostles, Elijah, Moses, Abraham, Melchizedek, Enoch and all dozens/hundreds of ancient prophets that Mormons claim in their line were never exposed to this Eternal saving ordinance but rather something very different. No, it’s not viable to simply state that even if followers of Mosaic law and far earlier made promises to be chaste, adhere to the law of obedience, and law of consecration that they thus received their Endowment. Kearney plainly admitted that the old testament temp rituals were nothing like today.

The Endowment initiated my apostasy and the points Kearney made in this podcast would have only accelerated it. The reality that the Endowment is a contemporary exercise only condemns it as a poorly implemented temporal product form god’s supposedly only true church on the earth that can’t even pass the test of a couple hundred years or even these past 60 years. A contemporary ritual that the Church routinely implies to the unlearned is ancient and eternal. A claim that is nonsensical and dishonest. No Greg, the reality is that the Endowment is indeed a clear signal that the Church’s truth claims are an illusion.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your Message:

Your Name*

Your Email*

Testimonial

I wanted to write and thank you for all the awesome work you do over at Mormon Discussions podcast. I’m always so excited to see what new articles you will post as I love to think about those ideas and utilize the concepts in my lesson planning. Thank you.

Chelsi A.

Contact Mormon Discussions

To contact a specific podcast host or to contact the podcast generally please email MormonDiscussionsPodcasts AT gmail DOT com
Thank you for reaching out!!!

Helpful Resources

Find us On Facebook and Twitter

Support the Podcast and Donate Today

At Mormon Discussions we look to help you navigate Mormonism. Please consider donating today to support our effort to provide Latter-day Saints the tools and resources and the safe space for conversations to navigate a difficult and often lonely faith transition. Donate today to a good cause while supporting Latter Day Saints like you! Your Donation is 100% tax deductible.

Support the Podcast through your Amazon purchases

Please consider making your Amazon purchases through their charity site https://smile.amazon.com and designating Mormon Discussion as your charity of choice. Please click below to get started.

Featured Links

Requested Legal Disclaimer by the LDS Church

Mormon Discussion’s podcast production is certainly not connected to The Mormon Church aka The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It also is most assuredly not approved or endorsed by Intellectual Reserve, Inc or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Any of the awesome content or the solid opinions expressed, implied or included in Mormon Discussion Inc’s awesome podcast lineup and production are solely those of Mormon Discussion Inc. and/or its program hosts and not those of Intellectual Reserve, Inc. or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Mormon Discussion Inc is a 501(c)(3) and is in the arena of journalistic work and is part of a free press. A free press is fundamental to a democratic society. It seeks out and circulates news, information, ideas, comment and opinion and holds those in authority to account. The press provides the platform for a multiplicity of voices to be heard. At national, regional and local level, it is the public’s watchdog, activist and guardian as well as educator, entertainer and contemporary chronicler. Under the “fair use” defense, however, another author may make limited use of the original author’s work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism.

The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights.

Subject to some general limitations discussed later in this article, the following types of uses are usually deemed fair uses:

Criticism and commentary: for example, quoting or excerpting a work in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment. A book reviewer would be permitted to quote passages from a book in a newspaper column, for example, as part of an examination of the book.

News reporting: such as summarizing an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report. A journalist would be permitted to quote from a political speech’s text without the politician’s permission.

Research and scholarship: perhaps quoting a short passage in a scholarly, scientific, or technical work for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations. An art historian would be able to use an image of a painting in an academic article that analyzes the painting.

Nonprofit educational uses: for example, when teachers photocopy limited portions of written works for classroom use. An English teacher would be permitted to copy a few pages of a book to show to the class as part of a lesson plan.

Parody: that is, a work that ridicules another, usually well-known, work by imitating it in a comic way. A comedian could quote from a movie star’s speech in order to make fun of that star.