One of the horror genre's "most widely read critics" (Rue Morgue # 68), "an accomplished film journalist" (Comic Buyer's Guide #1535), and the award-winning author of Horror Films of the 1980s (2007), The Rock and Roll Film Encyclopedia (2007) and Horror Films of the 1970s (2002), John Kenneth Muir, presents his blog on film, television and nostalgia, named one of the Top 100 Film Studies Blog on the Net.

Thursday, September 08, 2016

Star Trek 50th Anniversary Blogging: "The Devil in the Dark"

Stardate 3196.1

The
U.S.S. Enterprise arrives at the Pergium Mining Colony on Janus VI. There,
Chief Engineer Vanderberg (Ken Lynch) reports that fifty of his miners have
been killed -- burned to death -- by some kind of “monster” in the subterranean tunnels.

Because
many worlds depend on Pergium from the planet, Captain Kirk (William Shatner)
must put an end to the killings immediately, and restore the normal mining process. Unfortunately, the monster makes that mission
difficult by damaging the atmospheric processor and stealing a key piece of
equipment.

With
only 48 hours remaining before the reactor will go super-critical, Kirk teams
with Spock (Leonard Nimoy) to hunt the monster.

Down
in the mines, the duo discovers that the creature -- a horta -- is a silicon-based
life-form, and that she is retaliating against the human miners because they
have (unknowingly) been destroying her eggs. She is the mother to an entire race of hortas, and Spock attempts a
mind-fusion with her to forge a peace.

Except
for one notable exception (“The Alternative Factor”) the back-half of Star
Trek’s first season moves quite remarkably and assuredly from strength to strength,
from legitimately great episode to legitimately great episode. In short, “The
Devil in the Dark” is another absolutely pitch-perfect episode, filled with
humor, pathos, and great character touches.

One
can gaze at an earlier show, “The Man Trap,” and catalog the ways that “The
Devil in the Dark” is a major improvement, philosophically speaking. There, Kirk, Spock and Bones end up hunting
an intelligent creature that is the last of its breed.

Here, by contrast, they live up to their stated ideals, make peace
with a “monster” and forge a peace between the aliens and humanity.

In “The Man Trap,” all these officers could do was
express regret that they killed the salt vampire.

Here, the Horta and humanity
become friends, and actually work side-by-side, by episode’s conclusion.

In other words, the Starfleet characters don't just talk the talk in "The Devil in the Dark," they walk the walk too.

A
number of prominent writers have described “The Devil in the Dark” as being a
remarkable episode because the monster turns out to be sympathetic. Because the monster has a recognizable 'human' motive: she is a mother
protecting her young.

But let's put hat myth down once and for all. This isn’t an
original touch at all, nor the reason that "The Devil in the Dark" is so beautiful, so
important a tale. One can see that sympathetic
monsters dot film history (King Kong, anyone?), and that “mommy” monsters protecting their young are not that uncommon,
either (see 1961’s Gorgo, for one example).

Instead,
“The Devil in the Dark” is so remarkable because the “monster” and humanity
choose to work together, even after blood has been spilled on both sides.

Fifty human miners are dead.

Thousands of Horta eggs have been
destroyed.

And yet neither side -- human nor alien -- decides to pursue the easiest path; the path of revenge, or bloodshed. This expression of peace and forgiveness -- coming in the midst of the Vietnam War -- is actually a huge statement about man’s ability to overcome his violent nature.

Although the series often voices a distaste
for diplomacy and diplomats, there can be no mistake about what occurs here.
Kirk and Spock engage the Horta in diplomacy, and are impartial arbiters in a struggle. They
don’t take the side of the miners simply because they, also, happen to be
carbon based life-forms.

The
idea of mother monster protecting her eggs isn’t new, but it certainly does
make the story one that we can relate to on simple human terms.
We know, instinctively, the loss the Mother Horta has faced. We understand her anger and rage. Yet what seems more original, at least to me, is
the nature of the Horta.

Silicon
life-forms were rare in TV history before Star Trek, but later appeared on Space:
1999 “All that Glisters,” Star Trek: The Next Generation (“Home
Soil”) and even The X-Files “(Firewalker.”) The unique nature of the alien here makes it one of the most memorable in all of television history.

In
terms of characterization, there’s a scene in “The Devil in the Dark” that
speaks volumes about Kirk and Spock’s respective natures…and their mutual friendship. Spock has suggested that the Horta be saved,
for study, for the sake of science itself. Kirk insists it must die for it
murderous actions.

They are at odds.

Yet
when Kirk encounters the Horta, he doesn’t kill it when given a clear opportunity. He is guarded, of course, but sees the Horta's wounds
and realizes it may not pose the threat he feared.

He takes a chance, in other words, on peace
and understanding.

This is not only a
brave and heroic choice considering the personal danger, but one that suggests Kirk is a great leader, and a
fair minded person.

He will often plunge in,
“where angels fear to tread,” to quote The Undiscovered Country (1991), but then, when
he is calmer -- and has time to size up a situation, -- he proves judicious. The
reboots have captured this quality, delightfully.

In Into Darkness (2013), Kirk goes in,
guns blazing, to kill Khan, over Spock’s legal and moral objections. But when the time comes, Kirk decides to
attempt to arrest Khan instead...and let the egal system work.

Kirk -- in any universe -- may
not always arrive at the best, or correct answer instantly, but he finds his
way to it. That’s what makes him a great
captain. He is, in essence, fair minded. He can see beyond his own perspective.

And
look at Spock in this episode: He argues to save the Horta, persuasively, and
then -- upon learning that Kirk is in danger -- insists that the captain kill
it.

It’s not that he has reasoned his
way to the wrong answer, it’s that Spock places a great value on his friendship
with Kirk, and on Kirk’s survival. Logically, the Horta should be saved, but not at
the cost of Kirk’s life.

So
Kirk takes a chance that Spock may be right, and Spock puts aside his
perspective, his viewpoint, for the (emotional...) sake of friendship.
It’s a beautiful, mirror dynamic, and it is explored so well in this episode.

These men see the world very differently, and yet they are friends, and able to see the other's perspective.

I
also love McCoy’s role in this episode. He is ordered to heal a patient -- a silicon
life form -- and by gosh, he does! The
look of delight on his face when he bandages up the Horta is amazing, and infectious.

McCoy is a physician by character; by
temperament. He may grumble and complain
a lot, but if there is someone -- even a Horta -- who is sick, he is there for them,
ingeniously developing a treatment.

The Horta is visualized with a costume created by Janos Prohaska. A variation of the same costume appeared on TV previously, in The Outer Limits episode “The Probe.” I know some people call the Horta a “pizza monster,”
but I still find it convincing, in part because we can see a piece of it “breathing”
in Spock’s hands, and in part because we see its infected wound after a
phaser beam has injured it. I think the
suit is pretty good, especially considering that, in the end, the monster is
supposed to be different, but not fearsome.

Basically, "The Devil in the Dark" fires on all thrusters. It stands on a strong science
fiction concept (the silicon-based life form), enhances our understanding of
the primary characters (in Kirk and Spock’s mutual flip-flop about killing the Horta),
and reminds us that peace between unlike people is always possible, even after
blood has been spilled.

By
any reckoning, “The Devil in the Dark” rates as one of the ten greatest Star
Trek episodes of all time.

No comments:

Post a Comment

About John

award-winning author of 27 books including Horror Films FAQ (2013), Horror Films of the 1990s (2011), Horror Films of the 1980s (2007), TV Year (2007), The Rock and Roll Film Encyclopedia (2007), Mercy in Her Eyes: The Films of Mira Nair (2006),, Best in Show: The Films of Christopher Guest and Company (2004), The Unseen Force: The Films of Sam Raimi (2004), An Askew View: The Films of Kevin Smith (2002), The Encyclopedia of Superheroes on Film & Television (2004), Exploring Space:1999 (1997), An Analytical Guide to TV's Battlestar Galactica (1998), Terror Television (2001), Space:1999 - The Forsaken (2003) and Horror Films of the 1970s (2002).

Follow by Email

What the Critics Say...

"...some of the best writing about the genre has been done by John Kenneth Muir. I am particularly grateful to him for the time and attention he's paid to things others have overlooked, under-appreciated and often written off. His is a fan's perspective first, but with a critic's eye to theme and underscore, to influence and pastiche..." - Chris Carter, creator of The X-Files, in the foreword to Horror Films FAQ (October 2013).

"Hands down, John Kenneth Muir is one of the finest critics and writers working today. His deep analysis of contemporary American culture is always illuminating and insightful. John's film writing and criticism is outstanding and a great place to start for any budding writer, but one should also examine his work on comic books, TV, and music. His weighty catalog of books and essays combined with his significant blog production places him at the top of pop culture writers. Johns work is essential in understanding the centrality of culture in modern society." - Professor Bob Batchelor, cultural historian and Executive Director of the James Pedas Communication Center at Thiel College (2014).

"...an independent film scholar, [Muir] explains film studies concepts in a language that is reader-friendly and engaging..." (The Hindu, 2007)"...Muir's genius lies in his giving context to the films..." (Choice, 2007)