Stats

Friends

Recent Comments

My voice is cut out right at :14. That's where I'm alleging the cut - not during the active audio but that the actual statement is much longer than 14 seconds - Air the whole statement and print quotes in full or don't print them at all Indy.

"And they invented this, (speech disfluency), independent third party service". The original question at the beginning was intentionally cut off by the Indy and so was the full ending.

Like all of my quotes that were paraphrased, butchered, or otherwise altered in the initial interview, the Indy chose to edit what I actually said to suit their opinions (a common tactic of using paraphrases/out-of-context excerpts in liberal media).

Of course, no one sees the Indy as a serious highbrow journalistic outlet anyways - the original article was going to be more of a biopic and include my complete and unedited quotes and background information - however, the editors decided to make it into a hit piece, which is a shame because an infinite number of the best conversations were had. Jokes were told.

The actual article was lost and what you got instead was editorial garbage. You would've had the best article about me out of any outlet that currently exists, Indy, and you threw it away. That should make you sad as journalists - that you had the opportunity for a unique article with one-of-a-kind information about me and my life and you scrapped it for a very generic and boring read.

Any good interview/article will print unedited comments in full, without alteration. You already gave me the front page, what's the big deal if you give me another 1500 words, another 2500 words, hell, you could've made the entire issue just me and the advertisements, because more people read that article than any of the other ones on your website.

You should not only apologize for flagrantly misquoting me but also thank me for giving millions of views to a publication that you give away for free - that people still avoid reading.