"it is likely she will be evaluated for a clotting abnormality," he said.

Treatment of this condition consists of reversing the cause when known, controlling seizures if present, controlling the blood pressure in the
head, and anticoagulation. Anticoagulation is the most essential.

So she was evaluated for a blood abnormality, which likely
came out positive, as she remains on blood thinners today.

Also of note is the video that plays from that link.
Very informative on all of the issues she was dealing
with from this DVT. Not rumors at all...unless of course
the msm is gulity of spreading lies about Secretary Clinton.

ETA: Diagnosing Blood abnormality requires a blood test, in which
the abnormalities are found. If a disorder presents, one must take
thinners for life to prevent further clotting.

I did too, but it was in the "Hillary has Parkinsons or a Similar Disease" thread. The Thrombosis diagnosis was fact. Whether she still has
Thrombosis is anyone's guess, but the fact that Hillary is still taking Coumadin is bad news.

Thrombosis can be seen as almost like a side effect of the
blood abnormality, once a person has had many clots,
as Clinton has. Her blood clotted up in a vein, then
then the real problems start. Blockage, the clot
can move along up to the heart, it can pass through
the heart into the lungs.

Not everyone who has a DVT has blood abnormalities
but once a person has had several clots, the risk
becomes great to do a repeat.

She "admitted" (or rather it was widely reported in the news) that she HAD a blood clot in her head and it was dissolved. In early 2013. There's
nothing to admit to. This is old news being dredged up (and given a new diagnosis by the OP, apparently) to make her health issues seem worse
or current.

"She had follow-up testing in 2013, which revealed complete resolution of the effects of the concussion as well as total dissolution of the
thrombosis. Mrs. Clinton also tested negative for all clotting disorders.”

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.