sunset from behind the wire

Friday, April 15, 2016

What About the Kurds?

President G. W. Bush refused to partition Iraq based on its ethnic components (Kurds in the North, Sunni Muslims in Baghdad and Shiites in the South) because that would have been an admission that these tribal peoples, with different faiths (different sects of Islam), couldn't get along. Historically, they haven't been able to get along for roughly 1,200 years, but Bush and crew felt that inside every Iraqi, there was an American screaming to get out. Not hardly, but that's how American leadership felt at the time. And it all went to pot.

The second round of Syrian peace talks began in Geneva yesterday. One thing that is clear from the past five years of civil wars is that Western ideas about how Middle Eastern populations should govern themselves don’t work. The latest cumulative death toll for the Syrian civil war is 470,000 dead since 2011. The Iraqi numbers are far more grim than that, and I don't think that anyone is running the abacus on that.

It might be time to allow the people directly effected to try and figure out what will work and then run with that scenario. I realize that's a revolutionary concept and as such it may take a lot of persuading to get the US to buy off on it.

The Syrian Kurds are moving ahead with their federal autonomy referendum and hope to finalize plans in six months. A Kurdish official leading the effort said it is time the West gave its full backing to the Kurdish plan. "We don't expect hostile parties to support this project, but we hope Western states that have lived the experience of unions and federalism to support this type of project."

The official’s admonishment to Western leaders for opposing self-determination and federal solutions is well directed. In Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Yemen, Western leaders invariably opposed federalism solutions that would alleviate ethnic suppression. They reflexively supported unitary structures that served mostly the interests of the ruling political and economic elites. Even the present Kurdish autonomous region in Northern Iraq faced heavy Western opposition until the Kurds persisted and proved they could defend it and make it work...and the shiites running Iraq didn't want to fight them.

Allowing for ethnic divisions within Middle Eastern nations adds a default 'safe zone' for refugees in Europe who need to be shipped back. I realize that it's not politically correct to assume that everyone won't get along -- but they won't. That's why reading history is useful. Many of the problems that western nations including the US have had in the Middle East and on the Asian Subcontinent could have been avoided if American decision makers took the effort to read history.

Advice from art (The Princess Bride) that you should NEVER fight a ground war in Asia is sound, even if it comes from a movie turned cult classic.

And, moving on, I keep hearing mostly conservatives saying that the answer to the civil war in Syria and Iraq involves arming the Kurds. In and of itself, not a bad plan but they will confine themselves to a defensive war of "Kurdistan". No, Kurdistan doesn't really exist. The Kurds have no actual homeland and wherever they are, the political machines work hard to kill them off, most notably in Iraq, Turkey and Iran. So no, they're not suited to be mercenaries, sweeping out of the hills to cleanse the upper Euphrates Valley of the ISIL plague. But helping them and arming them puts a weed up the ass of the Iranians and Turks and I'm all for that.

They're trying to make it into the capital of Kurdistan, but there is still significant threat of invasion from Turkey to dampen that ardor. I am not suggesting that the Turks would hold Iraqi territory. It would be more like two armored divisions killing everyone and then leaving.

There is historically only 1 way that has proven effective in alleviating hostilities between populations. Don't make me spell out this one way. Don't make me.....

OK. I will expound. Let the populations at war finish the war. The winner will then spell out the rules for it's control of the territory it just won. That's it. It's inarguable.

Ghenghis Khan had this truism mastered. Either fit into his empire, or he marginalized you. And when you were marginalized by Ghenghis Khan, you STAYED marginalized. Don't make me explain this to you, don't make me....

OK. If you didn't play by Ghenghis' rules, he killed you. And by 'you,' if that meant a population of a million or two, then a million or two of 'you' would die. And then, no hostilities remained. Works like a charm every time it's tried. Ghenghis wins, you lose. Deal with it.

Now, on to the Kurd/Sunni/Shiite squabble. Apply the Ghenghis solution, and see who is still breathing after all the shooting stops. Pretty dang simple. And effective...

The Mongol model works. There was a Pax Mongolia that extended out from Karakoram for two hundred years. And while I'm not arguing that it worked and works, the situation that the Kurds find themselves in by not holding territory "officially" is more challenging.

That the Kurds have not been totally wiped out by Iran, Iraq, Syria and Turkey is mute testimony to their staying power. But without us loaning them/giving them armor and a vast logistic train, their capacity to march to Baghdad, for example, is limited.

What about the Kurds? They are no business of the US government or responsibility of the American tax payer. Bring all our troops home and use them to guard our borders. Nothing in the Middle East is worth one drop of American blood or one ounce of American gold.

There are advantages to be had by keeping them alive (on the cheap) that exceed the disadvantages of having them wiped out in my opinion. That doesn't include sending them US troops. However as the map above shows, the US had placed its base in Syria in the center of a Kurdish controlled area.

I admit to not being able any longer to sort out what the heck is going on. There seems to be so many players they have become one big muddle in my mind (what's left of it.) I'm sort of with Fredd. Let them sort it out.

Housekeeping

As of January 1, 2017 this blog began to receive anonymous posts. I try not to delete them, but if you want to be taken seriously here, you need to identify yourself, if only by some sort of cryptonym.

Welcome to Virtual Mirage

"But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.

"Oh, you can't help that," said the cat. "We're all mad here. I'm mad, you're mad."

"How do you know I'm mad," asked Alice?

"You must be," said the cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."

Good Morning

Virtual Mirage - What's on the other side of the mirror? Ask Alice how deep the rabbit hole really goes.

This blog is an extension of MY JOURNEY because sometimes my journey needs more explanation, and sometimes there is more to be said than can be expressed on one ordinary blog.

Sometimes it's politics (very serious), sometimes I address the human condition with a dose of humor, and other times it may seem as if the track is headed in a unique direction. I can be a complicated guy at times.

There are a few things you'll find I consider:

* Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

* Sometimes the questions are complex but the answers are simple.

* Love is the only condition where the happiness of another person is essential to your own.

* Steers do not sign treaties with meat packers. (think on that)

* Taxes are NEVER levied for the benefit of the taxed.

* The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no victory possible in defense.

WHITE POWDER (Novel)

There is something intoxicating about a secret.

THE OLD WHORE (NOVEL)

In the peculiar culture of the Central Intelligence Agency, "old whores" are people who will do whatever it takes to get the job done, irrespective of the cost.

EXILES FROM EDEN (NOVEL)

Sparks fly as two star-crossed lovers meet. He runs toward trouble as she yearns for something missing. And it ends in a flight from and toward justice.

About Me

Today, I balance work and play as much as anyone can. All things remaining equal, play is more important. Life is short - it's important to make every day count for something, if only to yourself.
I'm a former tinker/tailor/soldier/sailor who has now decided that maybe it really wasn't all done for nothing.

This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for educational purposes, and as such this constitutes 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Act. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.