If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Of everything I've read, heard, or seen from Wallace...that is the most damning.

There is no way he is with the team again next, either by their choice or his. Not with comments and an attitude like that.

Poor me...they forget about me, and then I forget I'm supposed to pay attention! That's pathetic. I would have much rather he said he had concentration lapses due to future contract uncertainty instead of that he feels left out of the offense and we should feel sorry for him about his mistakes.

This IS pathetic. This is TO-ish, except TO always produced. Go to Oakland. This guy is a POS. Close the chapter on him. I don't even want to see him on the field as a Steeler any longer.

Mike's lucky. Lots of ordinary folks would lose their job if they had the same problem. You know, like the guy who was working at the orange juice plant, and they fired him because he just couldn't concentrate...

I don't think he will be hard to replace. If this were the Arians offense with the 2010-2011 Wallace, he would be hard to replace in those conditions. But the 2012 version of Wallace with our 2012 offense? Hell, it will be easy to UPGRADE his position. There are plenty of WRs that we can get in the 3rd round with size and good speed. Or, considering our needs, probably draft one ever later than that. Surprisingly, we don't appear as thin at DB as we did just weeks ago.

There are plenty of WRs that we can get in the 3rd round with size and good speed. Or, considering our needs, probably draft one ever later than that. .

This is Homerism at its best. Finding another WR like Wallace is just not that easy. He's just not as important as some are making him out to be. There are more key positions to be good at than just one WR spot.

Brown is more valuable for what he is doing in any offense, Wallace needs to play in a different scheme.

That doesn't make him "easy to replace." There was a reason we took Santonio Holmes in the first round in 2006 after winning the Super Bowl.

This is Homerism at its best. Finding another WR like Wallace is just not that easy. He's just not as important as some are making him out to be. There are more key positions to be good at than just one WR spot.

Brown is more valuable for what he is doing in any offense, Wallace needs to play in a different scheme.

That doesn't make him "easy to replace." There was a reason we took Santonio Holmes in the first round in 2006 after winning the Super Bowl.

You mean finding a one trick pony who can't catch the ball unless there is no defender around him, one who fumbles and drops the ball all the time and one who has a jerk attitude is hard to replace. Oh, OK. Yea, I don't know how we will ever live without that.

You mean finding a one trick pony who can't catch the ball unless there is no defender around him, one who fumbles and drops the ball all the time and one who has a jerk attitude is hard to replace. Oh, OK. Yea, I don't know how we will ever live without that.

Over simplifying your argument doesn't make it anymore correct. It just makes it sound more absurd.

It's hard enough to draft one wide receiver that has the skill set of Mike Wallace and do the things he can do. It was amazing the Steelers were able to draft 3 wide receivers that produce and two of them studs.

To find a replacement for Wallace is not going to be "easy". I did however say the Steelers can win without him.

i was going to do the leg work myself but i saw this topic posted on anothber site and someone did it for me.
apparently wallace continues to think we are stupid(some 'real' fans still are)and doesnt realize that we can look up his stats from year to year.
another poster compared his stats and realized that wallace is not being targeted less this year than previous years but actually more......hmmmmmmm

Over simplifying your argument doesn't make it anymore correct. It just makes it sound more absurd.

It's hard enough to draft one wide receiver that has the skill set of Mike Wallace and do the things he can do. It was amazing the Steelers were able to draft 3 wide receivers that produce and two of them studs.

To find a replacement for Wallace is not going to be "easy". I did however say the Steelers can win without him.

OH, Ok, let's take it beyond words and look at the actual #s for a guy who will be so "hard to replace."

And the FACTS (something you probably don't like too much) prove he is being targeted MORE OFTEN this season than his previous seasons. And, he is so hard to replace, that on the below have more production than Wall_ASS has. That is 45 rec. who have more yards than does MW. I mean, how on earth will we ever find a way to replace a guy that ranks as 46th in the NFL in yards? That is insane. No way can we ever replace that.

OH, Ok, let's take it beyond words and look at the actual #s for a guy who will be so "hard to replace."

And the FACTS (something you probably don't like too much) prove he is being targeted MORE OFTEN this season than his previous seasons. And, he is so hard to replace, that on the below have more production than Wall_ASS has. That is 45 rec. who have more yards than does MW. I mean, how on earth will we ever find a way to replace a guy that ranks as 46th in the NFL in yards? That is insane. No way can we ever replace that.