Origen

, an illustrious father of the church, and a man
of great parts and learning, was born at Alexandria in
Egypt about the year 185; and afterwards obtained the
surname of Adamantius, either because of that adamantine
strength of mind which enabled him to go through so many
vast works, or for that invincible firmness with which he
resisted the sharpest persecutions. Porphyry represents
him as having been born and educated a heathen; but
JEusebius has clearly proved, that his parents were Christian. His father Leonides took him at first under his own
management, and trained him at home for some time: he
taught him languages and profane learning, but had a particular view to his understanding the Holy Scriptures;
some portion of which he gave him to learn and repeat
every day. The son’s inclination suited exactly with the
father’s design, so far as that he pursued his studies with
| most extraordinary zeal and ardour: but being endued with
a quick apprehension and a strong imagination, would not
content himself with that sense which at first presented itself, but farther endeavoured to dive into mysterious and
allegorical explications of the sacred books. This probably
suggested to his father that he might fall into that mode of
interpreting, which in fact, proved afterwards the source
of all his errors, and he therefore cautiously advised him
not to attempt to penetrate too far in the study of the Holy
Scriptures, but to content himself with their most clear,
obvious, and natural sense. But it appears that from a
forward conceit of his talents, he was already deeply infected with that “furor allegoricus,” as a learned modern
calls it; that rage of expounding the Scriptures allegorically, which grew afterwards to be even a distemper, and
carried him to excesses which can never be excused.

After he had been some lime instructed by his father,
other preceptors were sought out for him he had, for his
master in philosophy, Ammonius, the famous Christian philosopher; and in divinity the no less famous Clement of
Alexandria. From the former he imbibed that Platonic
philosophy, with which he afterwards so miserably infected
his Christianity, and gave birth to those many singular and
heretical opinions which have distinguished him above all
the primitive writers; but amidst these philosophical and
theological pursuits, ‘ he found time to cultivate several
arts and sciences: and so universal and powerful was his
genius, that, as Jerom relates, he acquired very great skill
and knowledge in geometry, arithmetic, music, grammar,
rhetoric, &c. He was not above seventeen years of age
when the persecution under the emperor Severus began at
Alexandria in the year 202: and, his father being seized
and imprisoned for his faith in Christ, Origen would also
have offered himself to the persecutors, out of the great
zeal he had to suffer martyrdom. This his mother resolutely opposed; but when he found he was detaiued against
his will, he wrote a letter to his father to exhort him to
martyrdom, in which he expresses himself thus: “Stand
stedfast, my father, and let no regard to us alter your opinion, or shake your resolution;” for he had six sons besides
Origen. Leonides, animated by his son, resolved to persist even to martyrdom, and was accordingly beheaded soon
after: and though his family fell into extreme poverty, his
goods being immediately confiscated, yet Origen, applying
| himself soon after entirely to human learning, by teaching
grammar made a shift to maintain himself, his mother, and
his brethren.

While he followed this profession, the chair of the school
at Alexandria becoming vacant by the retreat of Clement,
and by the flight of all those who were dispersed by the
persecution, some of the heathens, who were willing to be
converted, made their application to him, though he was
not then above eighteen years of age: and at length, the
reputation and number of his converts increasing every
day, Demetrius, bishop of Alexandria, confirmed him in
the employment of catechist, or professor of sacred learning, in that church. He then left off teaching grammar,
and sold all his books of profane learning; contenting himself with a small daily allowance of four oboli, which were
allowed him by the person who bought them. He now
likewise began to lead a most strict and severe life, which
contributed no less than his learning to draw a great number of disciples about him; although a violent persecution
was then begun at Alexandria under the government of
Lsetus, and was continued with equal fury under that of
Aquila his successor. Several of his disciples suffered
martyrdom there, and he himself was exposed to the rage
of the heathens, when he went, as he constantly did, to
the assistance and encouragement of the martyrs. He then
practised all kind of austerities, and carried the doctrine
of mortification so far as even to commit an unnatural act
upon his person, taking, contrary to his usual practice, the
following text literally, “There be some who make themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven” but he lived
to be convinced of his error, and afterwards condemned it.

It was about this time, in the beginning of Caracalla’s
reign, that he went to Rome, under the pontificate of Zepherinus; and began that great celebrated work, called
the “Tetrapla.” This was a Bible, in which, by the side
of the Hebrew text, he had transcribed in different columns
four translations, distinguished by verses; namely, the
translation of the Seventy, that of Aquila, that of Symmachus, and that of Theodotion. He afterwards added two
other versions, without any author’s name, and a seventh
upon the Psalms only, which he found at Jericho: and
these versions, with the Hebrew, which is written in Greek
as well as Hebrew characters, make up what is called Origen’s “Hexapla,” which was the first attempt to compile
| those Polyglots to which the Christian world has been so
much indebted. He had frequent occasion afterwards to
leave Alexandria, first in consequence of the invitation of
an Arabian prince to come and instruct him. A little
while after, the city of Alexandria being miserably harassed by the emperor Caracalla for some affront put upon
him, he retired into Palestine; and, settling in the city of
Caesarea, the bishops of that province desired him, though
he was not yet a priest, to expound the Scriptures publicly in that church, and to instruct the people in their
presence; with which request he complied. But whether
his bishop Demetrius secretly envied him this honour, or
was really persuaded that they had violated the rules of the
church, he wrote to these prelates, and told them, “it was
a thing unheard of, and had never been practised till then,
that laymen should preach in the presence of bishops:” to
which Alexander of Jerusalem and Theoctistus wrote back^
that “this had been often practised.” Demetrius, however, ordered Origen home, who obeyed, and betook himself to his first employment. Some time after, he was
again diverted from it by order of the princess Mammira,
who invited him to Antioch, that she might see and discourse with him: but he shortly returned to Alexandria,
where he continued till the year 228. He then went again
to Csesarea about some ecclesiastical affairs; and, as he
passed through Palestine, was ordained priest by Alexander and Theoctistus. This ordination of Origen by foreign
bishops so extremely incensed his diocesan Demetrius, that
from this time his conduct towards Origen was marked by
the most determined enmity. However, Origen returned
to Alexandria, where he continued, as he had long ago
begun, to write “Commentaries upon the Holy Scriptures;” and he then published five books of “Commentaries upon St. John’s Gospel,” eight upon “Genesis,”
“Commentaries upon the first 23 Psalms,” and upon the
“Lamentations of Jeremiah” his books “De Principiis,”
and his “Stromata;”

All this while the bishop of Alexandria continued to persecute him as fiercely as ever. The truth is, Demetrius
had long conceived envy and ill-will against him, on account of his shining merit and extensive reputation, and
took this opportunity of giving it full vent. He wrote
letters every where against him; he reproached him with
the violence he had committed on his person, which he
| had formerly extolled as flowing from the greatest prudence, zeal, and piety; and in a council which he assembled in the year 231, it was ordained that Origen
should not desist only from teaching, but even quit the
city. Banished thus from Alexaiidria, he retired to Caesarea, his ordinary place of refuge; where he was kindly
received by Theoctistus, bishop of that city, and by Alexander bishop of Jerusalem, who undertook to defend him,
and commissioned him to expound the Scriptures publicly,
hearing hiiii all the while as if he had been their master.
The encouragement he received at Csesarea, seems to
have exasperated Demetrius still more; who, not satisfied
with the first judgment given against Origen, accused him
in a council of the bishops of Egypt; and having caused
him to be deposed, and even excommunicated, according
to Jerom, wrote at the same time to all parts against him,
to procure his being expelled the catholic church. However, the bishops of Palestine, Arabia, Phoenicia, and
Achaia, who were particularly acquainted with his high
merit, and many of them very intimate with him, determined to support him to the utmost, and encouraged by
their zeal and friendship, he continued to explain the
Scriptures at Caesarea with great reputation, both in the
life- time and after the death of Demetrius, who did not
live long after he had condemned Origen. All sorts of
persons, not only from that province, but even from remote countries, came to be his disciples; the most famous
of which were, Gregory, surnamed afterwards Thaumaturgus, and his brother Athenodorus. But though, after
Demetrius’s death the persecution he had raised against
Origen abated a little, yet Origen was always considered
by the Egyptians as an excommunicated person; and the
sentence given against him by Demetrius continued under
his successors, Heraclas and Dionysius, although the former had been his disciple, and the latter had a great regard
for him.

After the death of Alexander Severus, under whose
reign all this happened, his successor Maximinus stirred
up a persecution against the church in the year 235. Origen concealed himself during this persecution, and retired
for some time to Athens, where he went on with his “Commentaries upon the Scriptures.” Under the reign of GorUianus, which began in the year 238, Beryllus, bishop of
Bostra, in Arabia, fell into a very gross error, affirming,
| that our Lord had no existence before his incarnation;’
upon which, some bishops gathering themselves together,
caused Origen to come thither also; who convinced him of
his error so effectually, that the bishop not only publicly
acknowledged it, but ever after retained a kindness for
Origen. Afterwards he was called, under the reign of
Philip, to another assembly of bishops, which was held
against some Arabians, who maintained that the souls of
men died and were raised again with their bodies. He
was then about sixty years old, yet pursued his studies
with his usual vigour; and not only composed several
books, but preached almost daily to the people, and for
the most part without any preparation at all, yet his discourses were so highly esteemed, that they were taken
down from his mouth, and afterwards published. Under
the persecution of Decius, he suffered with great constancy
for the faith. He was seized, put into prison, loaded with
irons, had his feet in the stocks for several days, where
they were cruelly extended beyond their natural dimensions. He was threatened to be burned alive, racked with
various tortures; but he bore all with resolution and firmness. Being released from prison, he held several conferences, and behaved in every respect like a confessor of
Jesus Christ; and lastty, after having laboured so much,
and suffered with such credit and glory, he died at
Tyre, in the reign of Gallus, aged sixty-nine, according
to Eusebius.

Though what we have at present of the works of Origen
made several considerable volumes, yet they are but an
inconsiderable part of what he wrote. Jerom, speaking
of Origen, says, “Who is there among you that can read
as many books as he has composed?” We may distinguish
his works into two kinds; the one upon the sacred Scriptures, the other into separate treatises upon different subjects. Not to mention his “Tetrapla” and“Hexapla,”
which were rather a collection than a work of his own, he
composed three sorts of books upon the Scriptures; and
these were “Commentaries,” “Scholia,” and “Homilies.” In his “Commentaries,” he gave himself wholly
up to all that heat and fire, all that genius and force of
fancy, which was natural to him; the better, as he thought,
to reach the height and depth of the Scriptures, and their
most recondite and mysterious interpretation. His “Scholia” were, on the contrary, only short notes, to explain the
| difficult places. These two kinds of works were rather for
jthe use of the learned than of the people; but the “Homilies,” which the Latins call Treatises, and we Sermons,
were moral lectures upon the holy Scriptures. We have
none of the “Scholia” remaining, nor hardly any of the
“Homilies” in Greek and those which we have in Latin,
are ^translated by Ruffinus, and others, with so much licence, that it is difficult, if not impossible, to discern
Origen’s own from what has been foisted in by his interpreters. A great part likewise of his “Commentaries”
are lost. The other Treatises of Origen are not near so
many in number as his works upon the Scriptures, and yet
they were very considerable; for, not to mention his “Commentaries upon the” Philosophers,“which Eusebius speaks
of, he wrote two books upon the” Resurrection;“a treatise” -De Principiis,“in four books; ten of” Stromata;“an” Exhortation to Martyrdom;“eight books against” Celsus;“”A Treatise upon Prayer;“’” A Letter to
Africanus concerning the History of Susannah," &c.

All Origen’s works, which remain only in Latin, were
collected by Merlinus, and afterwards by Erasmus, and
printed at Paris, in 1512, and at Basil in 1536, in 2 vols.
folio. Genebrard has since made a larger collection, which
was printed at Paris, in 1574, 1604, 1619, 2 vols. folio.
All the Greek fragments of Origen upon the Scriptures
were published, with a Latin translation by Huetius, and
printed in 1668, 1679, and 1685, 2 vols, folio; to which
are prefixed by the editor large Prolegomena, under the
title of “Origeniana,” in which are given, in three books,
a very copious and learned account of the life, the doctrines, and the writings of Origen. The eight books against
U Oelsus,“an Epicurean philosopher, which are by far the
most valuable of his works, were published in Greek, with
the” Translation of Gelenius,“and the” Notes of Hoeschelius,“in 1605, 4to; and afterwards very correctly at
Cambridge, in 1658, 4to, by William Spencer, fellow of
Trinity-college, who corrected the translation, and also
added notes of his own. To this edition are subjoined the” Philocalia, sive de obscuris sacrse scripturae locis,“of
Origen. Wetstein, Greek-professor at Basil, caused to be
printed there, with a Latin version and notes, in 1674, 4to,” The Dialogue against Marcion“(which, by the way, is supposed by Huetius to be a spurious piece), the” Exhortation to Martyrdom,“and the” Letters of Africanus
| and Origen, concerning the “History of Susannah and
lastly, the book” De Oratione,“was published at London,
in 1718, 4to, with notes by Dr. Ashton and Mr. Reading.
An edition of all Origen’s works was undertaken by Charles
Delarue, a Benedictine monk, who began to publish it at
Paris, in 1733, folio; and though the four volumes he has
given us do not complete his plan, yet they contain the
best, and indeed the only part of Origen’s works wprth any
attention. This was reprinted by Oberthur, in 1780, 15
vols. 8vo. The celebrated Montfaucon has published in 2
vols, folio, some remains and fragments of his” Hexapla,"
and more recently Bahrdt published at Leipsic the Hexapla, 1769, in 2 vols. 8vo.

Ecclesiastical history, as Fabricius observes, cannot furnish another instance of a man who has been so famous,
through good report and ill report, as Origen. The quarrels and disputes which arose in the church after his death
on account of his person and writings, are scarcely credible
to any who have not examined the history of those times.
The universal church was split into two parties; and these
parties fought as furiously for and against Origen as if the
Christian religion had itself been at stake. Huetius has
employed the second book of his “Origeniana,” which
consists of above 200 pages in folio, in pointing out and
animadverting on such dogmas of this illustrious father as
are either quite indefensible or exceptionable; and it is
confessed by all, that he swerved egregiously from the
orthodox faith. Cave has collected within a short compass
the principal tenets which rendered him obnoxious; and
thence we learn, that Origen was accused of maintaining
different degrees of dignity among the persons of the Holy
Trinity; as, that the Son was inferior to the Father, and
the Holy Spirit inferior to both, in the same manner that
rays emitted from the sun are inferior in dignity to the sun
himself; that the death of Christ was advantageous, not to
men only, but to angels, devils, nay, even to the stars
and other insensible things, which he wildly supposed to
be possessed of a rational soul, and therefore to be capable
of sin; that all rational natures, whether devils, human
souls, or any other, were created by God from eternity,
and were originally pure intelligences, but afterwards, according to the various use of their free will, dispersed
among the various orders of angels, men, or devils; that
angels, and other supernatural beings, were clothed with
| subtle and ethereal bodies, which consisted of matter, although, in comparison of our grosser bodies, they may be
called incorporeal and spiritual; that the souls of all rational beings, after putting off one state, pass into another,
cither superior or inferior, according to their respective
behaviour; and that thus, by a kind of perpetual transmigration, one and the same soul may successively, and even
often, pass through all the orders of rational beings: that
hence the souls of men were thrust into the prison of bodies
for offences committed in some former state, and that,
when loosed hence, they will become either angels or devils,
as they shall have deserved; that, however, neither the
punishment of men or devils, nor the joys of the saints,
shall be eternal, but that all shall return to their original
state of pure intelligences, then begin the same round
again, and so on forever.

These errors, and others connected with and flowing
from these, together with that “furor allegoricus,” above
mentioned, which pushed him on to turn even the whole
law and gospel into allegory, are the foundation of all that
enmity which has been conceived against Origen, and of
all those anathemas with which he has been loaded. His
damnation has been often decreed in form; and it has
been deemed heretical even to suppose him saved. John
Picus, earl of Mirandula, having published at Rome,
among his 900 propositions, that it is more reasonable to
believe Origen saved than damned, the masters in divinity
censured him for it; asserting, that his proposition was
rash, blameable, savouring of heresy, and contrary to the
determination of the catholic church. This is what Picus
himself relates in his “Apolog. c. 7.” Stephen Binct, a
Jesuit, published a book at Paris in 1629, concerning the
salvation of Origen, in which he took the affirmative side
of the question, but not without diffidence and fear. This
work is written in the form of a trial; witnesses are introduced, and depositions taken; and the cause is fullypleaded pro and con. The witnesses for Origen are Merlin, Erasmus, Genebrard, and Picus of Mirandula: after
this, cardinal Baronius, in the name of Bellarmine, and of
all who are against Origen, makes a speech to demand the
condemnation of the accused; on whose crimes and heresies having expatiated, “Must I,” says he, “at last be
reduced to such an extremity as to be obliged to open the
gates of hell, in order to shew that Origen is there
|
otherwise men will not believe it. Would it not be enough to
have laid before you his crime, his unfortunate end, the
sentence of his condemnation delivered by the emperors,
by the popes, by the saints, by the fifth general council,
not to mention others, and almost by the mouth of God
himself? Yet, since there is no other method left but
descending into hell, and shewing there that reprobrate,
that damned Origen; come, gentlemen, I am determined
to do it, in order to carry this matter to the highest degree
of evidence: let us, in God’s name, go down into hell, to
see whether he really be there or not, and to decide the
question at once.” The seventh general council has
quoted a book, and by quoting it “has declared it to be
of sufficient authority, to furnish us with good and lawful
proofs to support the determination of the council with regard to images. Why should not we, after the example of
that council, make use of the same book to determine this
controversy, which besides is already but too much cleared
up and decided? It is said there, that a man, being in
great perplexity about the salvation of Origen, after the
fervent prayers of an holy old man, saw plainly, as it were,
a kind of hell open; and looking in, observed the heresiarchs, who were all named to him, one after another, by
their own names: and in the midst of them he saw Origen,
who was there damned among the others, loaded with
horror, flames, and confusion.”

In the mean time, this illustrious and excellent father,
far from being universally condemned, has received the
highest eloges from the best and greatest men among both
ancients and moderns. JEusebius is upon all occasions his
advocate, and therefore need not be particularly quoted.
There was a time when Jerom himself spoke highly of
him, and declared him to be persecuted, not for his errors,
but his enviable superiority of talents; but Jerom afterwards changed his party, and abused him as heartily as he
had here commended him; although even then he was
obliged to acknowledge, that he had been a most extraordinary person from his infancy; “magnus vir ab infantia.” Erasmus had the profounclest veneration for Origen;
and declares, that he learned more from one page of him
than from ten of Augustin. Erasmus affirms also, that “in
the Exposition of the Scriptures, allowing for some particular points of faith, he would prefer one Origen to ten
Orthodox.” Mr. Daille“, in his” Treatise on the Fathers,“| says, that” Origen alone, had we but his writings entire,
would be able perhaps to give us more light and satisfaction in the business we are now upon, than all the rest.
We have but very little of him left us, and the greatest
part of that too, most miserably abused and corrupted;
the most learned and almost innumerable writings of this
great and incomparable person not being able to withstand
the violence of time, nor the envy and malice of men,
who have dealt much worse with him than so many ages
and centuries of years that have passed from his time down
to us." This corruption of his writings is a point, which
his apologists have always insisted on strongly: Ruffinus
particularly, in his defence against Jerom. Nay, Origen
himself heavily complained of this usage in his life-time;
uncertain, as it should seem, whether he was so served by
the orthodox, with a view of being made more odious, or
by the heretics, who were desirous to vent their heterodoxies under the great authority of his name.

We will conclude our account of this eminent father
with what a learned and candid critic of our own has delivered concerning him. Origen, says Jortin, “was very
learned and ingenious, and indefatigably industrious. His
whole life, from his early years, was spent in examining,
teaching, and explaining, the scriptures; to which he
joined the study of philosophy, and all polite literature.
He was humble, modest, and patient under great injuries
and cruel treatment, which he received from Christians
and Pagans: for, though he ever had a considerable number of friends and admirers, on account of his amiable
qualities and accomplishments, he was persecuted and
calumniated by men, who had neither his learning nor his
virtue, degraded from the order of presbyters, driven from
his home, and excommunicated by one Demetrius, bishop
of Alexandria, who envied him, says Eusebius, for the reputation which he had gained. His inquisitive genius, and
his mixing philosophy with Christianity, led him, perhaps,
into some learned singularities and ingenious reveries; but
he was by temper far from dogmatizing in such points,
from fomenting schisms, and setting up himself for the
head of a party. He lived in times when Christians were not
so shackled with systems and determinations as they were
afterwards, nor so much exposed to disingenuous and illiberal objections; and had more liberty to pursue their
inquiries, and to speak their mind. He was ever extremely
| sober and exemplary, practising what ’he preached to
others; and he lived and died poor, and destitute even
of common conveniences.” It may be necessary to add,
that there was a sect of ancient heretics, who resembled, and even surpassed, the abominations of the Gnostics: they were called Origenians, but appear to have
derived their name from some person totally distinct from
the preceding Origen, whose followers were called Origenists. 1

This text has been generated using commercial OCR software,
and there are still many problems; it is slowly getting better
over time.
The text was scanned and OCRd several times, and
a majority version of each line of text was chosen.
Please don't reuse the content
(e.g. do not post to wikipedia)
without asking liam
at holoweb dot net first (mention the colour of your socks in the mail),
because I am still working on fixing errors.
Thanks!