How the Tour de France is Broadcast To the World

by Wade Wallace

July 17, 2015

Watching the Tour de France is easy. You grab a beer, switch on the TV, and let the time pass by for the next five hours while the race meanders past 13th century castles, emerald green lakes, and panoramic mountain views while the breakaway hangs out to dry. Easy, right? Well there’s a fascinating technical solution and a detailed production plan that brings it all to your living room.

The Tour de France started out as a publicity stunt designed to increase sales for the newspaper l’Auto. Journalists and photographers followed the race as much as they could, filled in the gaps, and embellished the rest into a story of heroism and grandeur. Coverage was largely through writing and nobody knew any different.

The first Tour de France started outside the Café Reveil-Matin in the village of Montgeron. L’Auto reported:

“The men waved their hats, the ladies their umbrellas. One felt they would have liked to touch the steel muscles of the most courageous champions since antiquity. Who will carry off the first prize, entering the pantheon where only supermen may go?”

A century later the Tour de France is a world wide phenomenon and the third largest sporting event in the world after the FIFA World Cup and the Olympics. There’s barely a moment that we don’t get to see as it happens in real-time. The first Tour de France that was broadcast to television was 56 years ago and it was done by using a motion picture camera and a mobile processing laboratory. Five minutes of coverage would be produced for each stage and it would be broadcast to the rest of France.

France Televisions and Euro Media France are the two companies at the centre of the host broadcast production. Euro Media France are responsible for the technical solution to bring the on-course audio and video images back to the production rooms. France Television mix and produce the images so the feed can be distributed to licensed broadcasters. France TV also produces their own programming for the TdF to show to its audience. I spoke with Euro Media France’s CTO, Mr Luc Geoffroy who was generous with his time to give me a detailed explanation of the technical solution behind broadcasting the Tour de France.

Luc Geoffroy (CTO Euro Media France). A man who loves his job.

A few stats before we begin to give you an idea of the scale of this year’s Tour de France and its media following:

• 3,360km of racing

• 35 different start/finish town stages

• broadcast in 190 countries

• 450 journalists

• 121 TV stations covering the event, of which 60 do so live, with 260 cameramen working on motorcycles, in helicopters and at the finish line

• 4,500 people, from riders to organisers to media to members of the publicity caravan and so on

• A 12km long publicity caravan that includes 180 vehicles, 600 people and that distributes nearly 15 million items to fans

The technical compound (“Zone Technique”) behind the stage finish area contains dozens of production trailers, generators, support vehicles, catering and more. When set up and running, there is barely place on the ground where hundreds of kilometers of cables aren’t crossing over each other.

The Basics

At the core of the live race broadcast is the use of five VHF wireless cameras on motorbikes, two journalists reporting from motorbikes, and images captured from two helicopters with Cineflex gyro-stabilised camera systems. The five cameras on motorbikes capture the drama of the race from within while the helicopters cover the race but also capture much of the beauty of the French countryside which is such a large part of the production. At the finish line there can be between 1 to 20 additional cameras in place (depending on the broadcaster’s production) to capture rider interviews and the post-race action. Also new this year is a camera mounted on the Tour de France race director, Cristian Prudhomme’s car.

The “HF Long Distance System”

Images from motorcycle and helicopter cameras are transmitted via VHF links to relay helicopters flying at ~600 meters altitude. The signal is then retransmit them to aircraft flying at 3000-8000 meters (dependant on weather). These aircraft (some are unpressurised) need to circle very slowly therefore the turbulence can be highly uncomfortable for the pilots and technicians. If the weather turns bad then the use of the aircraft flying above the clouds becomes integral to the broadcast. In this case the GPS system on each bike becomes very important so that the aircraft can actually locate the motorbikes from 25,000 feet in the air.

Once the signal is sent to the helicopters and aircraft they are then relayed onto intermediate points sitting along the course (trucks which relay the signal onwards). In a typical stage there are two intermediate points. If it’s a very complex course with difficult terrain, there are sometimes three. These intermediate points are needed because stages can be as long as 225kms and the video signals need to be relayed from start to finish. The first intermediate points receives the signal and send it up to satellite. The second intermediate point forwards the signal to the town where the finish line is located via 4 receivers mounted on a crane 50 meters high. The eight camera signals are then decoded at Euro Media France’s OB truck (outside broadcast truck) which then performs some signal processing and minor colour correction to then send onto the France Television’s production truck sitting next door.

Time gaps that you seen on television are measured via GPS transponders mounted on the television motorcycles. This is not the time gap information used by the race officials however. You might notice the time gaps changing wildly on television. This is because the motorcycles are moving quickly, not because the gap is changing. Read more about how the time gaps are measured here.

The 50m high crane at the finish line holds the antennas for the intermediate points along the course to transmit their microwave links

As you can imagine, coordination of all of the vehicles is very complex. All of the moving vehicles need to communicate their exact co-ordinates to each other via GPS so their antennas can automatically move in sync with each other via motor mounts.

(It’s in French, but a good animation of the technical solution is from 1m50s onwards)

Why not use satellite?

A question you might be asking is why they don’t simply transmit the terrestrial signals to satellite in the first place instead of using relay helicopters and aircraft? It seems the obvious solution, however it’s not so simple. Receiving a satellite signal is one thing. Transmitting to satellite is another.

Satellites cannot be used is because the camera motorbikes and helicopters are constantly moving in and out of obstructive areas and there is approximately a 1% tolerance to aim the transmitted signal to a satellite. One Intermediate Point will transmit to satellite however because it is stationary and a sufficient power supply is more feasible. The other Intermediate Point will transmit the signal via microwave link to the finish line as discussed above.

A little more technical…

Because of my previous career as an engineer, Mr. Geoffrey and I were able to geek-out on some of technical aspects of the HF Long Distance system. For all you propeller heads out there, this is for you. If you’re not familiar with technical jargon, skip to the Production section, because there’s some more interesting things taking place there.

Euro Media Group spent three years developing their own modulation technique and chipsets that would deliver the special requirements of broadcasting a moving circus like the Tour de France. Mountains, valleys, heavy foliage, buildings, and multipath require dynamic modulation methods depending on signal conditions. Their proprietary digital modulation technique (based on DVB-T ) uses QPSK, QAM16/32/64 combined with 16 bit time-interleaving over a carrier with 10MHz bandwidth achieving 15Mbps (14Mbps video, 1Mbps audio). It might sound complex, but compared to modern day cellular communications, this is relatively straightforward.

The MPEG4 1920×1080 HD bitstream is encoded and modulated at the camera end. The digital signal is preserved by being encoded and decoded only once throughout the whole chain of events (encoded at the camera and decoded at the OB truck at the finish line).

Production

There can be only one video feed that gets distributed to the licensed broadcasters of the race, otherwise there would be hundreds of cameras and multiple sets of infrastructure out on the course. That raw video feed is done by Euro Media Group and then passed onto France TV to mix and create a single feed for the rest of the broadcasters to wrap up in their own production. Pre and post race shows, interviews, commentary, on-screen graphics, advertising, etc. For example, NBC had 75 staff working at the Tour de France and 15 others back at the studio in the US putting the whole production together. In comparison, SBS for the first time had two crews at the Tour with with less than a dozen people bringing you all of their coverage.

Euro Media France's mobile OB truck where the images are decoded and sent to France TV for final production to be broadcast to the world

Jean-Maurice Ooghe is the production director of France TV for the Tour de France. By his side is Ronan Pensec who watches the multiple camera images in the control room and helps Ooghe and his production team understand the nuances and race situation within the Tour. Pensec, a yellow jersey winner himself, has the intimate knowledge of bike racing so that the viewers don’t miss a moment of the race itself. Inside the France TV production trailer there are as many as 20 ingress camera feeds coming into different monitors (helicopters, motorcycles, multiple fixed cameras, audio) that need to be assembled according to the production plan. The race obviously takes priority, but for many of the people who tune into the Tour de France, it’s not about the bike race. For a wide audience it’s a opportunity to discover the regions of France from the sky.

For each stage a very detailed production plan (or script) is created by Jean-Maurice Ooghe. From January until the end of May Mr. Ooghe scouts the geographic and cultural points of interest within a 10-15km radius of the race route. Castles, lakes, waterfalls, tourist attractions, and celebrations put on by the towns (those large displays in the farmers fields don’t happen by accident). He will then create a shot book so that every church and other landmark they deem worthwhile is in the script. All of these points of interest are also given waypoints so the helicopters follow the shot list and the production plan for each stage.

Back in production trailers for the various broadcasters, commentators such as Phil, Paul, or Matt Keenan are given a Speakers Book which give detailed information about almost every single kilometer near the race route of different points of interest that will be covered. The Church of Saint-Pierre will be shown at kilometer 3.4 of the race (not necessarily along the race route – it could be 15 kilometers adjacent), a waterfall at kilometer 16.3, etc. The commentators see the post-produced race feed with all graphics, commercials, etc and are free to decide how they want to speak to their respective audiences.

Summary

As you can see the technology behind the Tour de France broadcast is equivalent to broadcasting a moving AFL Footy Grand Final for 22 days straight. It’s an enormous task that is just about to begin its planning for 2013. The production of the live feed to broadcasters is meticulously planned months ahead of time to meet the needs of many commercial objectives and almost every moment of imagery is scripted. As you can see, there’s much more than a simple bike racing going on behind the scenes.

ASO can broadcast and SBS can receive and rebroadcast the Tour de France from the back of a motorbike in HD from the middle of France to my living room in Brisbane, Australia but Channel 9 can’t show me an NRL game in HD from Suncorp Stadium 20 minutes up the road from where I live…

Dave

First of all, the Tour is not in HD on SBS. Unless they have made a major change since I was last able to analyse the SBSHD stream last year, the Tour on SBSHD is just a copy of the exact same SD stream seen on SBS1. I’m pretty confident they haven’t made that change, if they did they would have shouted it from the rooftops in their Tour coverage press release – which they didn’t.

The second thing is that there’s a lot more to quality than the number of pixels, a good SD broadcast is far better than a shoddy HD broadcast. The quirky MPEG-2 format used for FTA TV in Australia doesn’t allow the bitrate for HD sport to be done well, that’s why the networks are pushing for ACMA to allow MPEG-4 (provides higher quality at lower bitrates) to be unlocked here.

As for why SBS, Seven, Nine and Ten are not using the HD capabilities they have for live sport, there are two reasons:

1. Money. HD sport costs a whole lot more but doesn’t bring in any extra ratings – as Ten/ONE found out to their detriment when they experimented with running the AFL Finals Series in HD for a couple of years.

2. Monopolies. In the case of the three Nine games of NRL each week and the Tour, Nine and SBS have these broadcasts locked down with no competition allowed. Until the ACCC does their job and makes those anti-competitive broadcast agreements illegal, fans have no option to take their business to a competitor offering a premium product (Foxtel is forced to black out the Eurosport Tour coverage) and so the networks have no incentive to improve their product because the only other option is to not watch it. This is also why SBS don’t use their own commentary team for the Tour, they have no incentive to make that investment when the extra money could be spent on other programming.

Cycling and NRL only have this monopoly problem because they are small sports. AFL, F1, V8SC, cricket, soccer and the Olympics all have a two-tier broadcasting setup in Australia where a FTA network has basic coverage while the dedicated fan can put their hand in their pocket to get the full package with better coverage and fewer ads.

Owen

I suppose we need to define what HD is – I’m not talking about 1080p, I’m talking about 1080i. That (in this country) is an HD resolution for television broadcast. The SBS HD channel during TdF live coverage averages about 10Mbit/sec bitrate, which is about as high as I’ve seen any other HD broadcast (e.g. F1 on ONE HD, back in the day) in Brisbane. If that doesn’t make it “HD” enough for you due to low bitrate, then, fine, you are welcome to your opinion (and I wouldn’t disagree with you) – but for the sake of discussion, we can at least agree that a 10Mbit 1080i broadcast stream is “HD enough” compared to the 4-6Mbit 576i we get on all the other digital channels.

1. I don’t understand your point here. The technology is already paid for. All the channels already have HD broadcast capability. What costs them is an apparent lower viewership on the HD channels. But you know what? The HD channels probably have lower viewership because most of the time they’re showing replays of black and white movies from the 50s. Why can’t all the major players simply swap their primetime programming onto the HD channel and put all the old movies and kids shows on the SD channel?

2. Who are Phil and Paul employed by, if not the SBS? Wikipedia says ITV, NBC and SBS carry their commentary. Are they paid by all three stations or by one or none? :-) As for the rest: free-to-air TV has a special place in this country, and swapping one monopoly for another (Foxtel) is not the solution. My personal opinion is that I would not care if both formats were switched off tomorrow and we moved to an IPTV based solution.

Also, I find it laughable that you consider NRL to be a “small sport” but then go on to talk about V8SC (which as a fan of the sport, I do not consider it to be comparable to any football code in this country at all) alongside AFL etc. I suppose you are probably from Melbourne? I’m willing to accept your claim if there are viewership numbers to back it up, but I won’t accept your claim if you are merely experiencing from a similar exposure bias toward AFL that I experience toward NRL owing to our respective home-towns.

Dave

If it really has been upgraded to 1080i this year instead of just carrying the SD576 feed as SBSHD did last year then that is good news, though using the same bandwidth for a better quality 720p stream would probably be better.

1. Two reasons:
a) The anti-siphoning rules – Nine cannot premiere NRL matches on their HD multichannel (GEM) unless it is a simulcast of what is on the primary channel. Simulcasts don’t make money (because the league fans will still watch it on 9 if it’s not on GEM) so GEM carries other programming which can appeal to other people.
b) The equipment on the network’s end is a sunk cost, but the satellite bandwidth (from the OB van at Suncorp back to Nine in Sydney) is not. Even if there was money to be made from a HD simulcast, there would still be the extra costs.

2. Phil, Paul and Matt are paid for by ASO, the race organisers, to produce an English world feed. Phil and Paul are paid by the SA Government for the same purpose during the Tour Down Under, because the UCI insists on an English world feed as a contractual condition for non-European WorldTour races.

Of all the English language broadcasters in the world carrying the Tour de France, only Eurosport choose to take a clean feed (ambient audio only) and employ their own commentators.

3. Not arguing for a Foxtel monopoly, but competition. In terms of the Tour de France, a good deal would be to add it to the anti-siphoning list for a minimum of one hour of live programming per day, but also lift the Eurosport blackout to allow competition along the lines of the AFL or F1 where you can get some coverage on Seven or Ten and the full premium package on Fox Sports.
I agree that the internet will be the long-term way forward – but it doesn’t yet have the infrastructure to be viable.

4. Not in Melbourne.
NRL is a small sport in terms of being managed as a small sport by small men with small ambitions who think (word used loosely) it’s remotely okay for their flagship Friday night game to air at 10:30pm after the finish of Ice Station Zebra in markets outside their home town. The AFL supervises their broadcasters much more closely than that.
V8SC is certainly a smaller sport in terms of viewing numbers, but it is managed as a big sport.