I am a witness to a crime consisting of two parts: the fabrication of a fictional workplace mishap to explain injuries sustained in a drunken bicycle accident, and the withholding of important damning information—the fact the collision happened—which would rebut the lies told to ensure benefits; both of these components are fraud.

I’m not merely dissatisfied with WorkSafeBC’s bogus investigation, I know that full access to their file will prove that the investigator willfully obstructed justice, thus committing a crime himself, to hide a mistake. I have been plainly stating this in broadcast emails for some time now—C Ced to the police—naming names. This would be slander were it untrue, a determination easily made in court. So far, not a peep from the “offended”. Furthermore, for events to have unwound as they have my sworn testimony must be perjury. I have demanded that I be charged for this crime; zip.

I didn’t break a law to attract attention, I did it to get into court where my story would be heard by an impartial authority who could review my claim and who has access to what WorkSafe wants kept secret. It’s hard to do this when those who enjoy privileged access to justice do best by doing nothing. I get your point, it’s hard to fight this without making a fuss and the public noticing. Because what say is true and provable, WorkSafe balks. I will be pleased if they jump to the bait, but I doubt it.

Eventually, when I devise a stunt related to this fiasco—the prosecution of which will reside in a jurisdiction out of WorkSafe’s gambit—and I face a judge, WorkSafe’s sad history of misprision will include their failure to charge me. Unless they do, and things go quicker.

In my notes to WorkSafe I have often assured them that I will return to face the music, as soon as they call the tune, all they gotta do is whistle. Until then, I’ll practice the Kazoo.

]]>By: grim and bearing ithttp://vancouversun.com/news/staff-blogs/mom-shot-in-front-of-10-year-old-in-surrey-suspected-gunman-shoots-himself/comment-page-1#comment-203692
Wed, 26 Dec 2012 22:22:57 +0000http://blogs.vancouversun.com/?p=101128#comment-203692So let me get this straight David – you witnessed or had knowledge of a WCB fraud, you reported it, the authorities did not deal with it to your satisfaction, so you went a committed a few more crimes (uttering threats etc) to draw attention to the original crime?

You’ll probably end up in jail for it. In this case I’m going to go out on a limb and say that no news is bad news because the cops are probably in the investigative stage preparing to charge you with uttering threats against a government employee. Have fun in jail.

The food on offer in supermarket freezers is often invisible behind foil wrap, however we are assured by the photo on the label that the purchase will merit three stars from Michelin. It’s only when we have burned ourselves removing the package from the oven and ripped off its lid that we see the contents more closely resemble extrusions from a poisoned jackal’s hindquarters than what has been pictured. Too late, we notice the weasel-words in the tiniest font printable, against a background mocking legibility, the warning: “serving suggestion”. Sneaky, but not exactly a lie.

WorkSafeBC’s deception is far slicker. The empty boast that they will not tolerate fraud is clear and easy to find on their website. Diligent reading and paranoid interpretation are needed to notice and understand the implications of their statutory right not to justify adjudications. What this means is that, when they err, the wellbeing of those whose aid they solicit is of no concern to them, and whatever harm may befall the fool duped by their fraudulent inducement (being encouraged to act against ones best interest by a false claim ie.: fraud is not tolerated) is the sucker’s tough luck with no explanation due.

The difference is that we needn’t buy the crap food once we’re onto that game, but to withhold paying compo is illegal. Nice.

I’m glad for the comments of those who took the time to read my post, thanks. “You just won the loser trifecta”, well put, and a far better warning to those dim enough to believe in the majesty of the law than I managed. I’ve not lost everything though, I can still be honest about my actions without shame. The respect of those who feel trying to stop a sociopathic predator is snitching means little to me. To sarcastic: it’s a situation I find myself in, not one I sought (in the interest of brevity, I mentioned only a small amount of what went down; I had no choice). I fight with the weapons I have; maybe somebody here can advise on where to get a launcher. M.O.T., true, uttering threats to a public official is risky. On the plus side is the chance that FraudSafeBS will have to explain its dereliction of duty and obstruction of justice in a public venue, should they risk charging me. I think they will pass up the opportunity. There is also a zesty exhilaration to publicly pissing full in the face (figuratively speaking) of those who claim the right to enforce the very laws they themselves flout.

]]>By: Stevehttp://vancouversun.com/news/staff-blogs/mom-shot-in-front-of-10-year-old-in-surrey-suspected-gunman-shoots-himself/comment-page-1#comment-203690
Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:54:50 +0000http://blogs.vancouversun.com/?p=101128#comment-203690LOL
]]>By: non believerhttp://vancouversun.com/news/staff-blogs/mom-shot-in-front-of-10-year-old-in-surrey-suspected-gunman-shoots-himself/comment-page-1#comment-203689
Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:33:36 +0000http://blogs.vancouversun.com/?p=101128#comment-203689member me from pg loonie. i had the dope sittin up in the motel. just got out of the joint in wa. you remember me. you had bitches calling me trying to set up a jack 97′ remember? wasnt afraid of you then and damn sure aint afraid of you now. i dont even know why they say you have money bitch ass boy. youre a little white boy. god is looking out for you clown.
]]>By: non believerhttp://vancouversun.com/news/staff-blogs/mom-shot-in-front-of-10-year-old-in-surrey-suspected-gunman-shoots-himself/comment-page-1#comment-203688
Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:24:41 +0000http://blogs.vancouversun.com/?p=101128#comment-203688keep it simple stupid. the name says it all…
]]>By: Gongetitjackhttp://vancouversun.com/news/staff-blogs/mom-shot-in-front-of-10-year-old-in-surrey-suspected-gunman-shoots-himself/comment-page-1#comment-203687
Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:31:20 +0000http://blogs.vancouversun.com/?p=101128#comment-203687Only asses ASSume!!
]]>By: Mot the hooplehttp://vancouversun.com/news/staff-blogs/mom-shot-in-front-of-10-year-old-in-surrey-suspected-gunman-shoots-himself/comment-page-1#comment-203686
Mon, 24 Dec 2012 21:36:36 +0000http://blogs.vancouversun.com/?p=101128#comment-203686now that is funny MOT .. i’ve seen u carve people for off topic posts WTF is this ? lol
]]>By: Kim Bolanhttp://vancouversun.com/news/staff-blogs/mom-shot-in-front-of-10-year-old-in-surrey-suspected-gunman-shoots-himself/comment-page-1#comment-203685
Mon, 24 Dec 2012 21:32:14 +0000http://blogs.vancouversun.com/?p=101128#comment-203685Well Mrs. Polifax – you can see my latest posting. And Merry Christmas!
]]>By: Mrs. Polifaxhttp://vancouversun.com/news/staff-blogs/mom-shot-in-front-of-10-year-old-in-surrey-suspected-gunman-shoots-himself/comment-page-1#comment-203684
Mon, 24 Dec 2012 21:21:23 +0000http://blogs.vancouversun.com/?p=101128#comment-203684forget that, I just googled him and it seems he was charged with a knife attack in downtown Chilliwack in Nov 2011. (Christopher Nadin)
]]>