F1 2014 season: Get ready for the most dramatic start for years

That is the lesson from pre-season testing,
which finished in Bahrain on Sunday
with no obvious end in sight for the problems suffered all winter by world champions Red Bull and some surprise names looking like real front-line contenders.

The one caveat is that reliability problems started to creep in over the final three days even at Mercedes.

The other teams who use Mercedes engines - Williams, Force India and McLaren - also look in pretty good shape, particularly Williams.

New rules for this season
have introduced all-new 1.6-litre V6 turbo hybrid engines with extensive energy-recovery systems, and cars can use no more than 100kg of fuel throughout a race.

Red Bull struggles continue in testing

The Mercedes power-unit appears to have a significant advantage over those of Ferrari and Renault in terms of the amount of power it can produce for a given amount of fuel - a crucial element of the new F1.

Mercedes-powered cars have also topped the times in 11 out of the 12 test days this winter.

But it was a Williams, in the hands of former Ferrari driver Felipe Massa, that set the fastest time of all, rather than either Hamilton or Rosberg.

Headline pre-season testing times are notoriously unreliable indicators of true form, but Williams' insiders insist that their pace - which was equally impressive over longer, race-distance runs - is genuine. They were behind only Mercedes in the mileage charts, too.

As Ferrari team principal Stefano Domenicali said: "Mercedes and Williams seem to be in very good shape. That is what we have seen so far."

Williams, though, have put all their cards on the table - Massa's fastest lap was an all-out qualifying run on low fuel and the softest possible tyres.

The same is unlikely to apply to Hamilton's best lap, which was just 0.02secs slower than the Williams, albeit set the following day in different conditions. Indeed Hamilton admitted that there was "a lot more to come" from him and the car.

Lewis Hamilton finished quickest on the final day of testing in Bahrain

But even so, Williams look like being contenders close to the front in Melbourne on 15-16 March. And Force India appear not to be too far off, either.

The suspicion has to be that the factory Mercedes team have left some performance untapped, for it seems not to make sense that Williams and Force India, midfielders in 2013, can have cars of comparable pace to the team who finished second.

But even if Williams are somewhere close, they will have produced one of the great F1 revivals.

Last year was the worst in Williams' history -
they scored only five points.
Recognising they were in dire shape, a major overhaul of the team's engineering department has been undertaken, and already it seems to have made a big difference.

And their driver line-up of Felipe Massa and Valtteri Bottas, while not comparable to the stellar pairings of Hamilton and Rosberg or Ferrari's Fernando Alonso and Kimi Raikkonen, looks like a good blend of youth and experience.

The fourth Mercedes team, McLaren, share that with Williams, in teaming Jenson Button with Danish novice Kevin Magnussen, who has been turning heads with his obvious speed, flair and charisma.

Like Williams, McLaren have undergone major upheavals this winter, with chairman
Ron Dennis staging an internal coup
and ousting team principal Martin Whitmarsh following their poor season last year.

McLaren started testing brightly, but seem to have slipped backwards as time has gone by. And by the final Bahrain test this weekend Jenson Button was beginning to sound alarm bells about their performance.

Winners and losers from F1 testing in Jerez

"We've done some very good testing, we've been reliable, we've done some long runs, we've got a good understanding of the car," the 2009 world champion said. "But at the moment we're not quick enough."

McLaren, whose car has not changed much during testing, have a big upgrade package due for the first race, but the same will be true of all the other leading teams.

Ferrari have had a low-key winter testing programme, but the more time went on, the more it looked as if that was because they genuinely lacked a bit of pace rather than because they were trying not to show their hand.

Alonso finally got among the Mercedes-powered cars on the final day in Bahrain, with a lap of one minute 34.280 - Ferrari's first under the 1:35 barrier. But that was still a second off Hamilton's best lap, set at the same time and on the same type of tyres.

Alonso, incidentally, was 1.146secs quicker than Raikkonen overall, although as their times were set on different days and in different conditions that probably does not mean very much.

It would be unlike Ferrari to drain out all the fuel and go for what is known as a 'glory run'. So, despite the impression that they appear to be behind the Mercedes teams, especially on race pace, it would be foolish to write them off.

The concern for Ferrari seems to be largely their engine, which insiders say is some way short of the Mercedes in terms of power-for-fuel usage. Like at Mercedes, too, gremlins began to appear in the final test.

Reliability is a concern even for the team who have made that a trademark in the last decade or more.

But what of Red Bull, who have dominated F1 for the last four years?

F1 2014 rule changes

Their winter testing programme has been nothing short of disastrous, with only similarly troubled Lotus doing fewer miles. And if the Ferrari power-unit is lacking compared to the Mercedes, the Renault appears to be even further behind at the moment, both in performance and reliability.

The Red Bull has suffered failure after failure. And while the Renault engine has been disappointing, to say the least, a fair number of those failures were Red Bull ones - including the apparent front brake failure that pitched Sebastian Vettel off the track on the final day in Bahrain.

Red Bull's longest run of the entire winter was just 20 laps - a third of a race distance - as they struggled with all manner of problems related to both the power-unit and the rear of the car.

Their best time - 2.5secs off Massa - was set by new recruit Daniel Ricciardo, but the brief promise of the Australian's running on Friday evaporated the next day when Vettel failed to complete even a single lap.

The world champion, whose best lap time in Bahrain was 4.25secs off the pace,
admits the team's situation is "serious".
How could he not? But Red Bull have a consolation some others don't - the car might not work yet, but it does at least appear as if it will be genuinely quick when it does.

"I'm always worried about Red Bull," Button said. "If they can put a few laps together you can see their pace. They're strong. It's a good-looking car; it looks like it should work from an aerodynamic point of view and I think when they do get reliability, if they do, they'll be very, very competitive.

"I was driving with Ricciardo for quite a few laps and he couldn't get past me on the straights. He overtook me around the outside of Turn 11 instead, which is a high-speed left-hander. I've never seen anything like that before.

"If they can complete a race distance, they'll be near the front."

At the start of a season that heralds the biggest regulation change in a generation, and the introduction of the most complex engines ever used in F1, that qualifier about reliability applies to all the teams. But to Red Bull and Lotus far more than anyone else.

Share this story

Comments

While I can't see anything other than a Mercedes win for Hamilton or Rosberg to begin with, I think once Red Bull sort out their reliability woes they will once again be the team to beat. Which should make for a very interesting end to the season when it comes to deciding both titles.

#21 a sport is an event where you have to change your shoes....F1 is without doubt is a great sport as is all motor sport....where as chess isnt, on that definition, after saying that F1 needs a new champion this year.

Got it in one. It is because people like Toto Wolff who are not mechanics, innovators nor pioneers or engineers in any given circumstance are team leaders.

Still never understood why Mr Wolff was adamant that the way an F1 team is structured has changed. It has not. Colin Chapman was the only car designer/engineer, team principle and car company owner to ever be successful in F1. hmmmm

Yes, take the last 3 seasons...... Virtually no mechanical failures, and even with DRS etc, Red Bull walked it. The term 'Aero Package' is one commonly banded about by the various commentators on F1 (Both BBC and on SKY), as a simplistic term covering the development of aerodynamics that the cars utilise... As the mechanical side of things is stymied by the rules in place.

I was well pleased to see Massa topping the timesheet. Massa was considered hot property at one time, but staying so long at Ferrari has been his downfall. Being a 'number 2' is what he'll be mostly remembered for, so I hope the lad has a good time at Williams and gets some good results. A win might be stretching it, but a podium can't be out of the question if the Williams is as good as it looks.

F1 isn't what it used to be. The idea of pushing the technical envelope ended a very long time ago. Rule changes for the sake of increasing spectacle only serve to spice things up for as long as the changes take to be fully incorporated. After that reliability issues will vanish, and it will be (as before) the team which has the best 'aero' package... Drivetrain/driver(s) will become secondary.

@102. tiggers65 - F1 was a sport that I used to enjoy, now I dislike it and feel the need to comment. 10 years of "progress" has killed F1 as a sport. Regulations stipulate maximum fuel allowance whist teams fly 100's of people & tonnes of air cargo around the world. We are constantly told how advanced F1 cars are, So why can't a team put two cars on the grid with a maximum of 20 people?

235, Until something like a hydrogen fuel cell is utilised, personaly nothing is new.

Trains and trams have used kenetic energy recovery from the early 20th century. Graphene is the only game changer in battery and electrical technology, F1 Electric is the future but everyone knows the future will be pretty quiet and bland. Sorry if I sound negative but WYLD STALLYNS and party on dude.

I've been a massive F1 fan since I was around 10 years old (now 33), but the ridiculous new points system is the straw that broke the camel's back for me and I'm not watching again until Ecclestone gives up the reigns and the sport gets some of its dignity back.

235.No argument there but energy recovery is new and as a technology it's still in its infancy? Something that the manufacturers obviously want to exploit in competition for road car use further down the line

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.