Im just saying that I think D deserves a more professional looking logo. The
D-Man and the new logo can peacefully coexist. So those who have a "soft-spot
for the D-Man" can use it and those who dont like it can use something else. It
would be nice if Bright decided one for us that want to support D but don't
want a hand drawn character on their homepage. Having to many logos will also
be a bother because that will just start confusion, especially since there have
been other languages that have called themselves D if my memory serves.
Manfred Nowak Wrote:

DavidSwe wrote

Bright could select an official logotype

Walter has made that selection long ago:
by kindly asking what might be wrong with his D-Man.
-manfred

if there is really a need for another logo, i'd suggest holding a
logo-design-competition, like linus torvalds did once to find tux.
and btw - tux probably doesn't satisfy the attribute "professional
looking" either, at least if it's in that "corporate style, will be
taken seriously by suit-wearing folks"-meaning.
personally, i added a logo to the ddbg page only to get rid of all those
404's on favicon.ico ;)
DavidSwe wrote:

Im just saying that I think D deserves a more professional looking logo. The
D-Man and the new logo can peacefully coexist. So those who have a "soft-spot
for the D-Man" can use it and those who dont like it can use something else. It
would be nice if Bright decided one for us that want to support D but don't
want a hand drawn character on their homepage. Having to many logos will also
be a bother because that will just start confusion, especially since there have
been other languages that have called themselves D if my memory serves.
Manfred Nowak Wrote:

DavidSwe wrote

Bright could select an official logotype

Walter has made that selection long ago:
by kindly asking what might be wrong with his D-Man.
-manfred