Company Pleads Guilty To E-Rate Abuses

A U.S. affiliate of Tokyo-based NEC Corp. has pleaded guilty to
abuses of the federal E-rate program, including a canceled project to
give needy students in San Francisco access to the Internet. The
company agreed to pay the government $20.6 million in criminal and
civil penalties. The wrongdoing allegedly involved numerous other
companies and consultants still under investigation.

In the plea deal with the U.S. Department of Justice, NEC Business
Network Solutions Inc.—an Irving, Texas-based subsidiary of NEC
America Inc.—also accepted responsibility for violating federal
antitrust laws by allocating contracts to avert competition and rigging
bids for E-rate projects in five different school districts in
Arkansas, Michigan, South Carolina, and Wisconsin.

"We’ve made mistakes with the E-rate," Gerald P. Kenney, a
lawyer for NEC America, said in a statement. "We’ve acknowledged
and accepted responsibility for those mistakes, cooperated fully with
the government, and taken action to ensure that those problems
can’t happen again."

The Business Network Solutions division, which has since been
renamed NEC Unified Solutions Inc., has worked on about 40 E-rate
projects, according to the company.

Even with the settlement late last month, the case is certain to be
examined as part of an ongoing congressional probe of waste, fraud, and
abuse in the E-rate program, which Congress passed as part of the
Telecommunications Act of 1996. The program has awarded a total of more
than $8 billion for telecommunications services and equipment in
schools and libraries. The money is raised from a surcharge on
telephone services.

The investigations subcommittee of the Energy and Commerce Committee
of the U.S. House of Representatives probably will hold hearings on the
E-rate within the next few weeks, according to a committee aide.

Although the E-rate has been hailed for providing Internet access
and telecommunications services for many classrooms that otherwise
would not have such access, some projects have raised questions about
the management of the program. The Federal Communications Commission
oversees the program, which is administered by the nonprofit Universal
Services Administrative Co. ("E-Rate Audits Expose Abuses in the
Program," Feb. 12, 2003.)

Last year, for instance, two executives of New York City-based
Connect2 Internet Networks Inc. were convicted of fraud in providing
E-rate- financed Internet services to schools; those executives have
been prohibited from taking part in the program for three years.

Last month, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that
the Atlanta public school system, using E-rate funds, has bought more
equipment than it needed, overpaid for goods and services, and
maintained vague or incomplete records on its E-rate projects.

The 51,000-student district is currently conducting an internal
audit of its E-rate projects, which federal officials will examine as
they consider the district’s request for $20.4 million in E-rate
money for the 2004- 05 school year, according to Mel Blackwell, a
spokesman for the Universal Services Administrative Co.

Mr. Blackwell said the Connect2 convictions and the NEC settlement
show that the systems to provide "oversight and program integrity of
the E-rate" are effective.

"Although with some of these things, once you get to law
enforcement, they take longer than you would like, the result is good,"
he said. "We are happy to see the [NEC] case solved."

Spotting Red Flags

In announcing the settlement with NEC Business Network Solutions on
May 27, Justice Department officials said the company has been charged
with wire fraud by "entering into a scheme to defraud the E-rate
program and the San Francisco Unified School District by inflating
bids, agreeing to submit false and fraudulent documents to hide the
fact that it planned on installing ineligible items, agreeing to donate
‘free’ items that it planned to bill E-rate for, and
submitting false and fraudulent documents to defeat inquiry into the
legitimacy of the funding request."

"This conduct deprived the E-rate program of fair and competitive
prices, caused the program to pay for unnecessary and ineligible items,
and as a result, prevented the funding of projects at other needy
schools," R. Hewitt Pate, the assistant U.S. attorney general in charge
of the antitrust division of the Justice Department, said in a
statement.

The 60,000-student San Francisco schools will receive $3.3 million
of the fine for alerting authorities to the abuses.

"I absolutely feel vindicated," said district Superintendent Arlene
Ackerman, who helped initiate the three-year investigation by federal
and local law-enforcement agencies. "I feel I did the right thing."

In 2000, when Ms. Ackerman had just arrived in San Francisco, she
halted the district’s largest E-rate project, forgoing $48
million in federal money, because of "red flags" she saw—notably
millions of dollars in unanticipated costs that the district was
expected to cover.

"There were serious questions [that] I saw when I looked at the
[district’s E-rate] application; it didn’t even describe
San Francisco," she said in an interview last week.

At the time, she was criticized for passing up resources needed by
San Francisco students.

Ms. Ackerman overhauled the district’s facilities department,
where the E-rate project was organized, and fired two school officials
who were involved in the project. Both were subsequently convicted of
related crimes.

Vol. 23, Issue 39, Page 3

Published in Print: June 9, 2004, as Company Pleads Guilty To E-Rate Abuses

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.