The results are shown on the left, and should be compared against the HarrapaWorld Admixture spreadsheet. I am not very familiar with the HW components, and you should not assume that similarly named Dodecad and HarappaWorld components reflect the same entities. This is probably due to probable differences in data (e.g. lots more West Eurasian vs. South Asian participants) and methodology between the two projects.

Nonetheless, I would say that these results largely confirm the "Mediterranean" character of the "farmers" Gok4 and Oetzi from Italy and Sweden and the "North European" character of the hunter-gatherers Ajv52, Ajv70, and Bra from Sweden and Iberia. I glanced through the the HW spreadsheet, and it seems that even small discrepancies, e.g., Oetzi's 12% NE_Euro from DIYHarappaWorld vs. the 0% North_European from Dodecad K12b are consistent: note that Sardinians, the most Oetzi-like population have a similar 12% NE_Euro in the HarappaWorld spreadsheet, and 0% in the Dodecad K12b one. Hence, this is probably a case of different anchoring of the similarly named components in the two projects, rather than a manifestation of different results of the ancient samples vis a vis modern populations.

DIYHarappaWorld, like K12b, is a high-resolution calculator, and hence does not show the clear absence of the West_Asian component in prehistoric Europeans; this component spans the West Asian highlands, and is replaced in both calculators by the twin Caucasus and Gedrosia/Baloch component that are much more localized in their respective areas. Even though both Caucasus and Gedrosia/Baloch are related to-, the are not equivalent to the West_Asian component; for example, the K12b Caucasus component includes both the K7b West_Asian and Southern in the local blend of the Caucasus, and this explains the paradox that Oetzi has no West_Asian but 1/5 Caucasus.

Nonetheless, even using the DIYHarappaWorld and K12b, we can intuit that something did change in Europe in the last 5,000 years ago. This is most evident in the levels of the "Baloch" component (=Gedrosia of Dodecad Project) which is near zero in all individuals but reaches levels of ~10% in West European populations today. Certainly, the interesting fact that the rather uniform West_Asian Indo-European adstratum in Europe is transformed (at a higher resolution) into Gedrosia in the West (e.g., Irish) and Caucasus in the East (e.g. Russians) of the continent merits further investigation

I have also tried the MDLP5 calculator on the same data (on the right). I was not able to find population average data for this calculator, but it seems that the difference between farmers and hunter-gatherers is captured by the "Paleo-mediterranean" vs. "West-Eurasian" dichotomy.

Overall, I think this was a worthy exercise which largely confirmed the picture drawn from the original papers and my application of the Dodecad calculators over their data. It certainly seems now that a Mesolithic, North-European-like substratum experienced gene flow from a Mediterranean, South-European-like population that conveyed the new agricultural way of life during the Neolithic. Hopefully, we will get new data from the last 4-5 thousand years before too long, so that my hypothesis about the Indo-European mediated final formation of the European population during that period can be tested.

Old Blog Archive

Dienekes' Anthropology blog is dedicated to human population genetics, physical anthropology, archaeology, and history.

You are free to reuse any of the materials of this blog for non-commercial purposes, as long as you attribute them to Dienekes Pontikos and provide a link to either the individual blog entry or to Dienekes Anthropology Blog.

Feel free to send e-mail to Dienekes Pontikos, or follow @dienekesp on Twitter.