> Any of those options are fine with me. I was thinking that if you wanted to talk sooner, we might be able to help explain our intentions with this framework a bit better. I figure that the framework interface will change a bit as we all advance and incorporate our various techniques into it. I think that the current interface is a good first step, but there are certainly many more steps to come.
>
> I am fine delaying this code a bit, just not too long. Meeting at the forum for a while might be a good option (we could probably even arrange to call in others if you wanted).

Sounds good, let do this.

Thanks,
george.

>
> Cheers,
> Josh
>
> On Feb 25, 2010, at 6:45 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>
>> If Josh is going to be at the forum, perhaps you folks could chat there? Might as well take advantage of being colocated, if possible.
>>
>> Otherwise, I'm available pretty much any time. I can't contribute much about the MPI recovery issues, but can contribute to the RTE issues if that helps.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:39 PM, George Bosilca <bosilca_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Josh,
>>
>> Next week is a little bit too early as will need some time to figure out how to integrate with this new framework, and at what extent our code and requirements fit into. Then the week after is the MPI Forum. How about on Thursday 11 March?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> george.
>>
>> On Feb 25, 2010, at 12:46 , Josh Hursey wrote:
>>
>>> Per my previous suggestion, would it be useful to chat on the phone early next week about our various strategies?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel