October 30, 2012 "PR Newswire" -- OCALA, Fla., Oct. 30, 2012 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Larry Klayman, founder and chairman of Freedom Watch, today announced that President Barack Obama and Vice President Joseph Bidenhave been criminally indicted for having willfully released classified national security information concerning the raid onOsama bin Laden's compound, U.S. and Israeli war plans concerning Iran and their cyber-attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. The release of this information, among other harm to U.S. national security, resulted in the killing of members of Seal Team Six by terrorists and the arrest and imprisonment of American covert agents by Pakistan, such as the doctor who aided the CIA with regard to the bin Laden assassination. U.S.-Israeli war plans with Iran have also been compromised.

A true bill of indictment was issued by a Citizens' Grand Jury in Ocala, Florida, who reviewed evidence and voted unanimously to indict Obama and Biden at 6:02 pm on October 29, 2012.

The criminal defendants, Obama and Biden, will now be given notice of their indictment, arraigned and then tried for their alleged crimes.

Mr. Klayman, the Citizens' Prosecutor, issued the following statement: "The Citizens' Grand Jury, after having deliberated, yesterday issued a true bill of indictment. See www.citizensgrandjury.com It did the work that the government should have done, but does not have the integrity to do; that is hold these public officials accountable under the law. For far too long government prosecutors, who are put in place by politicians, have looked the other way as high public officials like Obama and Biden violate the law to further their political agendas. Now, as a result, the people must therefore exercise the rights given to them by the framers of the Constitution, and themselves take legitimate measures to restore the nation to some semblance of legality. This indictment (see www.citizensgrandjury.com) of Obama and Biden is just the first step in a legal revolution to reclaim the nation from establishment politicians, government officials and judges who have represented only their own political and other interests at the expense of 'We the People.' Obama and Biden will now be tried in a court of law and I am confident that they will be convicted of these alleged crimes."

We have had ambassadors murdered abroad before, but we have never seen anything quite like the tragic fate of Chris Stevens. Amid all the controversy over Libya, we have lost sight of the human — and often horrific — story of Benghazi: a U.S. ambassador attacked, cut off and killed alone, after being abused by frenzied terrorists, and a second member of the embassy staff murdered, as two American private citizens rushed to the rescue, heroically warding off Islamist hit teams, until they were overwhelmed and also killed.

Seven weeks after the tragedy in Benghazi, new government narratives just keep appearing, as various branches of government point the finger at one another. Now the president insists that “the minute” he “found out what was going on” he gave “very clear directives” to “make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to.” The secretary of defense argues that he knew too little to send in military forces to save the post. Meanwhile, we are hearing from other sources that the beleaguered compound in extremis was denied help on three separate occasions, and there are still more contradictory accounts.

When the government systematically misleads and cannot establish a believable narrative, almost everyone involved is eventually tarred. The final chart of those officials in the Nixon White House who were devoured by Watergate was vast — and so it is becoming with the disaster in Libya. If we have learned anything from Watergate and Iran-Contra, it is that the longer officials deceive and obfuscate, the greater the number of wrecked careers and reputations.

Most likely, the political wing of the White House almost immediately made a decision that the attack on our Benghazi consulate should not endanger the conventional narrative of a successful commander-in-chief — ahead in the polls in part because he had highlighted a supposedly successful foreign policy. Key to that story was the notion that the hit on bin Laden and the drone attacks on other Islamists had rendered al-Qaeda all but impotent. In addition, the administration’s supposed lead-from-behind strategy in Libya had served as a model for energizing a democratic Arab Spring. Commander-in-Chief Obama was intent on reminding the country of his competence and toughness as an international leader, and especially of his wise reluctance to rush into areas of instability.

In such a landscape, Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans were brutally murdered. And almost immediately it was clear that the ambassador had earlier warned that Libya was descending into chaos and that Americans were not safe there — only to have his requests for further protection rejected.

During the actual assault on the consulate, a real-time video, streams of e-mail exchanges, and surveys of Islamist websites confirmed that al-Qaedists were carrying out a preplanned assassination — and over the next seven or eight hours it became clear that our staff was in dire need of military assistance that was somehow never sent. Then for nearly two weeks, the president, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, Press Secretary Jay Carney, and U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice advanced a counter-narrative that simply could not have been true: A spontaneous demonstration over a two-month-old video — just happening to coincide with the anniversary of 9/11 — got out of hand as some disruptive protesters showed up with machines gun, mortars, and RPGs and began killing Americans. Since it was an American religious bigot who had prompted such terrible but “natural” riots with his video that ridiculed and injured Islam, we should apologize for the uncouth among us in the strongest terms.

Obama, Clinton, Clapper, Rice, and Carney strove to outdo each other in damning the obscure video maker — to such an extent that he was summarily arrested on a supposedly outstanding probation charge. The message? Ambassadors die and careful U.S. foreign policy is undermined when right-wing bigots abuse their free-speech rights.

Yet almost all of that story is untrue, and it will come back to haunt all those who either by intent or through ignorance engaged in the cover-up. Review the following spinners.

President Obama still does not grasp the significance of Libya. When he calls the attacks there and in Egypt “bumps in the road” or “not optimal,” and asserts that they will not play much of a role in the final weeks of the campaign, he sounds either callous or naïve or both. Collate the administration’s statements over the two weeks following the attacks, and they simply cannot be true. The months-old video proved just too much of a temptation for the president to resonate the themes of his Cairo speech in damning uncouth Americans for offending Muslims. When the president claims that he ordered everything to be done to save the compound, he must be aware that subordinates who did not in turn give orders that relief be sent will eventually come forward to either affirm or deny his statement. His further problem is that lax security, administration misdirection, and hesitancy to aid the beleaguered all feed into the earlier attitudes framed by “overseas contingency operations,” “man-caused disasters,” “workplace violence,” promises to try KSM in a civilian court, the al-Arabiya interview, the Cairo speech, and other efforts to contextualize and airbrush radical Islam’s terrorist assault on the West. In other words, fairly or not, we can discern a logic to why the president would not be candid and accurate about Benghazi.

Secretary Clinton will have to explain why the State Department did not heed requests for greater security, both before and during the attack. And she is beginning to grasp — and so especially is her husband — that the administration is hanging the disaster around her neck. She crudely blamed the attacks on our embassies in the Middle East on the video (with caskets of our dead as backdrop), reminding us that a few months earlier she had crudely giggled about the murder of Qaddafi (“We came, we saw, Qaddafi died”). All in all, her performance during this disaster has been disappointing, and more so with each new disclosure.

Then we come to Ambassador Rice, who apparently was being groomed to succeed Secretary of State Clinton. As part of that trajectory, she was to be point woman for the administration’s spontaneous-mob narrative. That meant that on at least five different occasions Rice hit the Sunday talk shows, apparently to showcase her rhetorical skills, insisting that the attacks in Cairo and Benghazi were ad hoc assaults that had nothing to do with U.S. foreign policy, anti-American animosity, or mistakes in American security preparation. Whether through ignorance or by design, Ambassador Rice repeatedly told an untruth, and did so with energy and dogmatic insistence. Her problem, then, is not just that what she insisted was true was clearly not, but also the unambiguous and forceful manner in which she wove her story. That she suddenly appeared from obscurity to play the sophist, and then retreated back into anonymity, suggests that her diplomatic career will be soon coming to an end.

Next is the matter of Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. His insistence that a mob had caused the mayhem is one untruth or mischaracterization too many — and a wrong assessment that trumps even his earlier absurdities, such as that the Muslim Brotherhood is largely a secular organization or that Qaddafi would not fall from power. Politicians and bureaucrats err all the time; but when intelligence officers do not appear to have intelligence, then they too usually quietly disappear into comfortable retirement.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs General Martin Dempsey at some point supposedly received information about the attack in real time. Why — given the supposed directive of the president to do “whatever we need to” to save our people — he did not order military assistance will have to be explained. Uncertain conditions will not do, because that is what militaries do: go into uncertain conditions to save lives and defeat the enemy. Armchair tacticians will argue that planes and teams could have been sent and then called off near arrival time if that was what circumstances seemed to warrant; that option would have been wiser than sending no one and thereby ensuring that the compound and annex would be overrun. And because General Dempsey has not been shy in weighing in on matters political by warning retired servicemen not to comment on contemporary politics (General Wesley Clark apparently excepted), and because he has phoned a Florida pastor to tell him to tone down his anti-Islamic rhetoric, the public will all the more expect an explanation. If the chairman can lecture both civilians and retired officers on proper behavior, then he should be able as well to explain why he did not heed the president’s order to do “whatever we need to do.”

CIA Director David Petraeus is now by implication being faulted. A brief communiqué that the CIA did not refuse pleas for assistance was prompted by anonymous administration officials’ allegations that it was our intelligence agencies, not the State Department or White House officials, that prevented assistance to our diplomatic mission. At some point Petraeus will probably have to use all his influence and power to correct the administration’s narrative, which is apparently intended to shift culpability to him and his agency. General Petraeus, by his singular record, probably should have been made either chairman of the Joint Chiefs or NATO supreme commander; he apparently received neither offer. After pulling off the surge in Iraq, he was redeployed into Afghanistan under far different — and more difficult — circumstances that limited his range of options, and he had to give up his nominally superior billet as CENTCOM commander. When he took on the CIA job, he apparently was asked to retire from the military. There is a pattern here: selfless service to the United States, but recently in the context of a politicized administration that has used the enormous prestige of Petraeus in ways that have reduced his influence. Directing responsibility away from the administration to the CIA is more of the same, and it puts a historic figure like Petraeus in an unfair predicament.

Benghazi was a disaster, whose graphic details most Americans do not fully know and, in some sense understandably, do not wish to relive. Still, we await two simple clarifications: an administration timeline of exactly who was notified, in what manner, and when on the night of the attack, and a full release of all information detailing the administration reaction to the murders, from the hours in which the attack occurred to the present day.

Without that honesty, those responsible will only continue to weave their tangled Libyan web.

The Israeli Supreme Court fails to duly register a petition asking to
compel the Banking Regulator to register a complaint against a bank, and
the Supreme Court petition is purportedly assigned to an unknown Supreme
Court Judge, Liat Ben Melech, with no judicial appointment records to be
found... The case shows the State of Israel being administered as a US
corporate province.

Stanley Fischer, Governor of the Bank of Israel - Israel's Banking
Regulator and Bilderberg Member, Supreme Court of the State of Israel, FATCA

Jerusalem, October 30 - In Zernik v Fischer (7650/12), filed in the
Supreme Court of Israel on October 23, 2012, Joseph Zernik, PhD, asked the
Court to compel Stanley Fischer to register a complaint, which was duly
filed with Bank of Israel – Israel's Banking Regulator - against Israel's
largest bank, Bank HaPoalim.
In a letter forwarded today to the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court, Dr
Zernik is asking for certification of the filing of the Petition and its
due assignment to a lawfully appointed judge. [1]

In his letter, Dr Zernik notes that the online public access system of the
Supreme Court failed to register the filing of the Petition paper itself
under the respective case name and caption.

In his letter, Dr Zernik also notes that the online public access system
failed to register assignment of the case to a judge, and by phone, senior
staff in the office of the clerk claimed that the case was assigned to
Judge Liat Ben Melech, an unknown person, for whom no Judicial Appointment
records are to be found.

In Zernik v Fischer (7650/12), Dr Zernik of Human Rights Alert (NGO),
claims that Stanley Fischer, Governor of the Bank of Israel – Israel's
banking regulator – has been patronizing organized white-collar
criminality at the top management of Bank HaPoalim, BM, the largest
consumer bank in Israel. [2]
The Petition asks for a conditional decree, why Fischer would not order
the immediate registration of Dr Zernik's August 25, 2012 Complaint
against Bank HaPoalim, BM, and its due review. [2]

On August 25, 2012, the Complaint againt Bank HaPoalim, BM, [3] was first received by Bank of
Israel-Banking Regulation, but regardless of repeated requests, Bank of
Israel refuses to confirm registration of the complaint and its due
review.

The August 25, 2012 complaint against Bank HaPoalim provided evidence
that the Bank issued fabricated legal papers, claiming that it was
authorized and required to establish and enforce its own version of United
States IRS code on "United States Persons" in the State of Israel. With
it, the Bank demands that "United States Persons" sign waiver of privacy
for the United States government, relative to their banking transactions.

The Petition to the High Court of Justice says:

The Petitioner alleges, that the matter at the foundation of instant
Petition is blatantly unlawful conduct of executives at Bank HaPoalim,
BM, and/or affiliates against the Petitioner and other "United States
Persons" in the State of Israel. Such conduct by Bank HaPoalim, BM,
and/or affiliates shows the characteristics of organized white-collar
crime. Such conduct commenced prior to the filing of the Petitioner's
Complaint, and continues to this date with full knowledge and patronizing
by Bank of Israel-Banking Regulation. The ongoing refusal by the
Respondent and Bank of Israel-Banking Regulation to register the
Petitioner's Complaint against Bank HaPoalim, BM, is integral to this
state of affairs.

The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the 2013 Universal Periodic
Review of Human Rights in the State of Israel documented numerous
falsified electronic records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel,
including large number of decisions, certified by the late Chief Clerk
Shmaryahu Cohen, up to five years after his death. The submission also
documents that the Supreme Court's Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz has been
occupying her office for the past ten years with no lawful appointment
record. [4]

In FATCA, the US is forcing its own unlawful practices on the
banks and banking regulators of other nations.
Given the notorious corruption of US banks and US banking regulation,
and the successive collapse of US financial institutions in recent years,
responses of various nations to such US extortion define the territory of
influence of the US-based legal/banking fraud racket. In the case of the State of Israel, the case
provides a new perspective on US-Israel relationship, one where the State of
Israel is administered as a US-corporate province, where the US is key to the corruption
of the government of the State of Israel.

FATCA is clearly an act of a
rogue nation.

For simplicity sake:

LIFE OF LUIGI

Luigi was born in Milano. He
is a citizen and resident of ITALY. Luigi
was born to parents, who were US citizens, and they obtained for him after
birth a US passport. Luigi never set a foot in the US, never worked in the US,
never did business in the US. Luigi keeps his savings in the Banco De Milano,
in Milano, a financial institution that is chartered by the Republic of Italy,
pursuant to Italian law.

NOW

Luigi gets a letter from Banco de Milano, unsigned, never naming the sending individual or financial institution, demanding that Luigi waive his privacy to the US government, and also file annually tax returns with theUS government, with copies to the Banco de Milano. Reason - there is pressure by the US government to do so. No basis in Italian law is ever even mentioned.

Obviously, such conduct amounts to extortion under the color of
law.

Therefore, the emerging map of
nations, who submit to US extortion under FATCA defines the territory of
the legal/banking fraud racket:

UK
says: Yes, let's put down the matrimony in writing…

See below a link to a US-UK Agreement, proposed UK FATCA
implementation legislation, and a business advice page on FATCA compliance..

CANADA says: No, thank you!

See below under the Wikipedia entry, controversy.

GERMANY says Fine, we will not serve American customers any
longer…

Conduct of German banks may amount to discrimination under German
law.

In the current episode, the State of Israel is about to submit to
the racket, with Stanley Fischer, Governor of the Bank of Israel and a
Bilderberg member, as the key actor. The
episode sheds new light on the US-Israel relationship, one where Israel is
administered as a US corporate province. Surprisingly, the
following lines were permitted to remain on Wikipedia under both the Stanley
Fischer and FATCA entries:

Petition against Governor of the Bank of Israel Stanley
Fischer, filed in October 2012 with
the High Court of Justice, alleged that Fischer's failure to stop Israeli banks
from acting on FATCA against Israeli customers, amounted to "replacement
of his loyalty to the State of Israel and its laws, with loyalty to another
nation and its laws and/or financial institutions and their
interests" [19]

[3]
Agreement Between The Government Of The
United States Of America And The Government Of The United Kingdom Of
Great Britain And Northern Ireland To Improve International Tax Compliance
And To Implement FATCA.

According to a report published in corfupress.com news portal, Greek Police officers arrested a 24year old in Corfu island, after posting pictures in his Facebook profile and in a blog. The young islander who participated in yesterday’s antifascist demonstration in Corfu, uploaded a series of photos showing policemen protecting and chatting with members of Golden Dawn ultra nationalist party. Many locals and members of the main Opposition Party SYRIZA-EKM and others of the smaller far-left ANTARSYA party are demonstrating outside the Police Headquarters in the famous Greek island. According to the Greek Police the young man is accused for breaching policemen personal data and for spreading false news which can harm the the country’s prestige.

World Riots 24/h11 hours ago29/10/2008 Clashes between fascists and antifascists students in Piazza Navona in Rome, Italy, during a demonstration to protest against a law expected to cut spending on education and research. 15 students were arrested by police. - BEFORE & AFTER

29/10/2008 Clashes between fascists and antifascists students in Piazza Navona in Rome, Italy, during a demonstration to protest against a law expected to cut spending on education and research. 15 students were arrested by police.

Monday, October 29, 2012

Given the ambiguity in paper filing
procedure and in online public records of the Supreme Court, request was filed
with the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court to certify the registration
and judicial assignment in this case.

RE: Dr Joseph Zernik v Governor of the Bank of
Isreal Stanley Fischer (Bagatz 7650/12) – request for certification of registration
of entry of commencing paper and due assignment to judge.

Your
response in this matter within 10 days is respectfully requested.

To the Honorable
Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz and Head of Unrepresented Parties Division Attorney
Ben Tovim:

In a phone conversation with Attorney Ben
Tovim yesterday, we discussed the following –

1. Registration
of entry/rejection from registration of the commencing paper "Petition for
a conditional decree" in the above referenced action, which was filed on
October 23, 2012 - in our conversation I raised concerns
regarding the registration of the commencing paper in this case. In contrast with previous cases, Attorney Ben
Tovim refused to sign the "Received" stamp in the designated space on
the date of filing. In the online public
access system there is no direct notation of the entry into registration of
such paper, in contrast with a second paper, filed on the same date, which was
listed online under "Requests", as "Waiver of fees", and
also in contrast with other Bagatz files, where on the filing of the commencing
paper, under "Events", one finds notation "Process
filed". In response, Attorney Ben
Tovim was angered that I bother him with such questions. However, a reasonable person, upon review of
the records in this case and similar cases in the online system, surely will
find the records inconsistent and ambiguous, and therefore, is likely to be
concerned, where no concern should be
found in the first place.

2. Status of the case and due assignment to a
judge - In our phone conversation I mentioned that the
processing of this case appears much slower than usual. Attorney Ben Tovim responded that the case is
in the "good hands of Magistrate Liat Ben Melech". In this case, as in other cases, the online
public access system shows no information regarding assignment of cases to the
due judicial authority. Moreover, search of the decisions of the Supreme Court
finds "Liat Ben Melech" only as an attorney, who appeared on behalf
of the government of the State of Israel in a couple of cases in the years
2003-4. No record was found, referring
to "Liat Ben Melech" as "Magistrate". Similar searches in the Registry of the State
of Israel (Judicial Appointments) and on the networks in general, failed as
well to discover so far any mention of "Liat Ben Melech" as
"Magistrate" of the Supreme Court.

Therefore, I would be grateful if the office
of the Clerk of the Court could please produce to my address, below, a
certificate pertaining to Dr Joseph Zernik v Governor of the Bank of Israel
Stanley Fischer (Bagatz 7650/12) regarding: a. Entry/Rejection
from registration of the commencing paper in the action, referenced above,
"Petition for a Conditional Decree", which was filed on October 23,
2012, and b. Status of the processing of the case and due assignment to
the appropriate judicial authority.

11-12-10 Where should Occupy go next? Civil Disobedience in the footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!http:// www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/12-06-08 Courts and Judges as racketeering enterprises under RICO (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - key element in the current financial crisishttp://www.scribd.com/doc/96504009/Secede! The US in its current form is simply unmanageable...

What did the experts say?

* דוח סייג לזכויות האדם נכלל בדוח התקופתי של האו"ם לגבי זכויות האדם בישראל (2013), בלוויית ההערה: "חוסר יושרה בכתבים האלקטרוניים של בית המשפט העליון, בתי המשפט המחוזיים, ובתי הדין למוחזקי משמורת בישראל".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2010 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in the United States, with the note: "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2013 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in Israel, with the note: "lack of integrity of the electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel."

The United States

* "...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* Los Angeles County is"the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud."FBI (2004)

* “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000)

* “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.”Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/239647129/The HRA submission was incorporated into the 2015 HRC Professional Staff Report on the United States with the note: :“HRA NGO recommended restoring the integrity of the IT systems of the courts, under accountability to the Congress, with the goal of making such systems as transparent as possible to the public at large.”

[2] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2013 UPR of the State of Israel was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Lack of integrity in the electronic record systems of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees' courts in Israel".

2012-06-04 Human Right Alert's Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the

[3] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2010 UPR of the United States was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."

2010-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the

2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:

[1] 10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States, where Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission was incorporated with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/http://www.scribd.com/doc/108663259/