In the first clip you will hear him state in plain language that he considers VACCINES to be desirable to bring down the future population number
P and so reduce Co2. You will also casually hear him promoting HEALTH CARE and REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES, to accomplish that same C02 reducing
goal.

Here are Bill Gates' verbatim words [square parentheses additions for clarification purposes are mine though]:
"The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care,
reproductive health services, we could lower that [number of 9 billion] by perhaps 10 or 15 percent. But there we see an increase of about 1.3
[billion]."

Let's focus on the vaccines. Gates is stating that he considers vaccines to be useful in contributing to bring the projected population growth of 2.2
billion down to 1.3 billion, roughly one billion. What kind of properties can thus reasonably be deduced that vaccines are to have according to Gates?
Well, basically all the properties that impede people to either have children, or successfully rear them. In other words, Gates implicitly advocates
the definition of his favorite kind of vaccine to be one that fosters infertility, sterility and (early onset) senility (autism) alike. Note that
Gates does not mention a word on the much touted purported intention of vaccines: to offer protection against relevant diseases

Originally posted by PharohGnosis
If there is this mass depopulation agenda being carried out, then why has the world population been going up instead of down? This is proof enough to
prove there is no nefarious agenda going on.

Answering the question of whether or not depopulation is real, I always let the "elites" speak for themselves.

In a recent speech at TED, Bill Gates, stating that the global population was heading towards 9 billion, said, “If we do a really great job on new
vaccines, health care, reproductive health services (abortion & sterilization), we could lower that by perhaps 10-15%.”

“Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world, because the US economy will require large and increasing
amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries”. -Dr. Henry Kissinger

“World population needs to be decreased by 50-70%” -Dr. Henry Kissinger

“The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to
contraception, sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must be done by
whatever means necessary.” Initiative for the United Nations ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER

“War and famine would not do. Instead, disease offered the most efficient and fastest way to kill the billions that must soon die if the population
crisis is to be solved. AIDS is not an efficient killer because it is too slow. My favorite candidate for eliminating 90 percent of the world’s
population is airborne Ebola (Ebola Reston), because it is both highly lethal and it kills in days, instead of years. We’ve got airborne diseases
with 90 percent mortality in humans. Killing humans. Think about that. You know, the bird flu’s good, too. For everyone who survives, he will have
to bury nine” - Dr. Eric Pianka University of Texas (Pianka is an evolutionary ecologist and lizard expert, who revealed solutions for reducing the
world’s population to an audience on population control. He received a standing ovation.)

“The illegal, we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.” -Dr. Henry Kissinger New York Times, Oct. 28, 1973

That is a massive section of the population receiving long term medical services.

This is possibly one of the reasons for the recent publicising of
Dignitas services.

The treatment of the elderly, particularly in Britain is likely to push many older people to consider ending their lives rather than being cared for
by our current facilities.

People have been living for longer and longer due to medical intervention and 'better' living standards. The quality of life is better for some than
others. Once the taboo of suicide is removed, as it is being in some circumstances, the option to choose when and how we die may indeed reduce the
population to some extent.

We breed like bacteria. I doubt there is any method that could stop us without completely wiping us out, our at least decimate us to unsustainable
numbers on a ruined planet.

Either way it's going to be messy.It's down to ourselves to regulate our reproduction, but many people don't get it. Some just cant see the problem
with having 5,6,7 + children, several of whom will likely go on to have large families. If you want 10 kids, try conceiving 2 and adopt 8.

I don't know whether there is a credible depopulation agenda in effect or not, but I do know this, if there is , it ain't working and the human race
will sometime in the next 1000 years or so, drown in it's own excrement

Originally posted by blah yada
We breed like bacteria. I doubt there is any method that could stop us without completely wiping us out, our at least decimate us to unsustainable
numbers on a ruined planet.

Either way it's going to be messy.It's down to ourselves to regulate our reproduction, but many people don't get it. Some just cant see the problem
with having 5,6,7 + children, several of whom will likely go on to have large families. If you want 10 kids, try conceiving 2 and adopt 8.

I don't know whether there is a credible depopulation agenda in effect or not, but I do know this, if there is , it ain't working and the human race
will sometime in the next 1000 years or so, drown in it's own excrement

There are 3.79 million square miles of land in the US alone.

There are 640 acres in a square mile.

There are 2,425,600,000 acres of land in the US.

There are 7 billion people on the planet.

You could give everyone on the planet a quarter-acre of land and not even fill the US.

Originally posted by blah yada
We breed like bacteria. I doubt there is any method that could stop us without completely wiping us out, our at least decimate us to unsustainable
numbers on a ruined planet.

Either way it's going to be messy.It's down to ourselves to regulate our reproduction, but many people don't get it. Some just cant see the problem
with having 5,6,7 + children, several of whom will likely go on to have large families. If you want 10 kids, try conceiving 2 and adopt 8.

I don't know whether there is a credible depopulation agenda in effect or not, but I do know this, if there is , it ain't working and the human race
will sometime in the next 1000 years or so, drown in it's own excrement

There are 3.79 million square miles of land in the US alone.

There are 640 acres in a square mile.

There are 2,425,600,000 acres of land in the US.

There are 7 billion people on the planet.

You could give everyone on the planet a quarter-acre of land and not even fill the US.

Over-population is a myth.

7 billion people.

10,000,000,000,000,000,000 Insects at any giving time

8.7 million species of Biological Life on Earth

Yes we can Co habitat on Earth,

but HUMANS DONT SHARE

If things dont stay in balance, Mother nature will Kill what ever is out of Balance

There could certainly be an agenda going on to encourage a slowing of the population growth or even a slight decline. However at the same time there
is a strong interest to maintain enough working hands and plenty of unemployed hands to replace the working hans, if they think they can demand better
working conditions or more money.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.