As I was reading your essay, I noticed one major thing: Your whole essay was based on
probablys and if it were modern
day…

Exactly. Modern day Christians want to hang me up by the testicles for
doing the exact same things that Jesus did. They have a double standard. They label the
exact same behaviour in me gay and excuse it in Jesus.
Granted, the very notion of homosexuality is recent. Jesus’s peers did not even
have a word for homosexual, so obviously he could not possibly have identified himself as
gay as I do.

Firstly you said that Jesus was gentle… Being gentle has nothing to do with
homosexuality… It just proves that Jesus is kind, compassionate and will
treat His children the same way.

True, but any gentle male is at risk for being labelled as gay and
being beaten up as gay because of the Christian-fomented hatred against gays.

Secondly you said that Jesus rejected masculine behaviour… I’d
personally like to know where that is found in the Bible and what it has to with
anything.

By that I meant the masculine arts of fighting and warfare.

Next you said that Jesus refused to have sex with women…

It was to keep Himself pure and holy so that later on we could be washed clean
of our sin by Him and His blood.

Homosexuality is to prefer men over women for sexual purposes.

Just because Jesus didn’t have sex with women, doesn’t mean He had
sex with men.

Again I point out the double standard. Any male in modern day who
refuses sex with women is presumed to be gay. You are making a special exception for
Jesus based on your belief that he shouldn’t be gay, couldn’t be gay,
ignoring evidence about his actual behaviour.

Why did Jesus hang out with such disreputable people? Because He wanted to forgive
them of their sins and show the world that He could not only save the good man but the sinner (e.g prostitute, gangster and homosexual) as
well. For God so loved the world that He gave His only son, that whosoever that
believeth in Him shall not perish but have everlasting life.

Same double standard. You give Jesus the benefit of the doubt you
would not give a modern person doing the same thing.

Tell me something: if a female put her head in another woman’s lap, would
you say that she is a lesbian? The disciples were probably tired. And Jesus’
company being male? Every priesthood in the Bible is a group of males. Besides, Jesus
did have close female friends — Mary and her sister Martha.

If two men or two women did that in a public restaurant, what would
you conclude? Why do you apply a different standard to Jesus? You are not looking at
the evidence in an unbiased way. You have pre-made up your mind that Jesus could not
be gay because being gay is wicked. Perhaps being gay is not as wicked as you
imagine. After all there are only two places in the Bible where it makes that
assertion, in Leviticus where it condemns everyone to death even people who eat
lobsters and in St. Paul. St. Paul never even met Jesus. That was just Paul’s
opinion, not Jesus’s. Jesus never mentioned the sin of homosexuality, though he
hammered over and over about judgementalness (hint hint). Paul had some other nutty
ideas we blithlely ignore, e.g. concerning suitable female headgear for church.
Consider also the possibility that Jesus had that one human imperfection.

They kissed each other on the cheek, which was a sign of politeness.
Luke 7:45.

Further, in some modern Mediterraneoan cultures heterosexual males
use a greeting kiss.

The Bible is divinely inspired — 100%. God is in control, so what was left
out was not His word. So, there is no point in discussing it. But…
loved him and might be with him… many loved Jesus
and wanted to follow Him. If Jesus just cured you of death, would you not love
Jesus?

In Conclusion: Jesus, the Word of God made flesh, would not go against the Word,
Himself, which says that homosexuality is wrong.

I love you and God loves you and is willing to take away all your sins. God said that
judgement will soon come upon you unless you turn back to Him. God’s telling me
that some Christian hurt you big time and now you’re lashing out all your anger on
Him.

There is a big difference between having a dispute with
Christianity and a dispute with God. I contend Christians blaspheme God and misrepresent
His will. The Bible is a work of man that Christians put forward as the work of God. It
is thus a forgery. It is not of sufficient quality and accuracy to be genuine. Parts of
it may be divinely inspired, such as the beatitudes, but all of it, no
way!. Most of it is blithering nonsense. Try reading it some day, perhaps guided
by my Bible study
guide.

But God is willing to forgive you, heal your hurts and give you the joy and peace
you’ve been waiting for a long time. Even during the time of judgement, God will
still wait for you for He is the God of Love.

Well, I suppose that it is possible. However, comparing what is normal behavior for
Western males with male behavior in the Gospels just doesn’t work — too many
differences in culture. That leaves you with only the suppressed Gospel fragment, not enough basis for your edifice. On the
other hand, if you want to cite someone in the Bible who may have been homosexual, why
not (Saint) Paul? There is an excellent explication of this thesis in Bishop John Shelby
Spong’s Rescuing the Bible from Fundamentalism, 1991, Harper San Francisco, Chapters 7 & 8.

Saying that Jesus is gay is not the same as saying he had sex with men,
just that this was his natural orientation. Given that roughly 10% of people are gay, it is not all that improbable that both Jesus and
Paul were gay. Think of all the people in the Bible. Arrange them in order of likelihood
of being gay. Jesus and Paul are both up there at the top, along with David and Jonathan.
Jesus was born in a manger the son of a lowly carpenter. Jesus told the story of the good
Samaritan. It seems plausible he would also choose to be born the despised sexual
orientation. He wanted us to love everyone even homosexuals and sinners. What better way
to demonstrate that?

EI just stumbled upon your article about Jesus being gay and by the looks of your
other articles you seem to be one that one believes what he can back up
scientifically/physically. Now how did you get the idea that Jesus was gay, when you
bring forth no physical proof and no scientific proof. the fact that you are even
allowed to own a URL (Uniform Resource Locator)
disappoints me. You who live by the earthly deeds shall perish by the earthly deeds.

I gave my evidence in my essay Was Jesus Gay. It is not that extraordinary a
claim. One in ten people is gay. That means roughly a tenth of the people mentioned in
the Bible were probably gay. Who were they? The most likely candidates are David,
Jonathan, Paul, Jesus. There must be many more. What I find preposterous is the way you
will swallow a totally outrageous claim — that Jesus was the only son of God, with
far less evidence than I presented he was gay. Jesus was born in a manger. It makes sense
he would also choose to be born into a persecuted social class, the gays. Saying he is
gay talks about his sexual orientation, not about whether he was sexually active. You are
the one with the big judgement of gays. Jesus never said a word against them.

What you said about 1 in 10 people being gay, what you forgot is that is now, our
time, not two thousand years ago.

The Bible talks about homosexuals. They clearly existed even in the time
of Moses. Why would human sexuality have changed?

your prob is that you can’t except the fact that we as humans see all the good
in the bible and even though jesus sets a good example, you can’t except the fact
that he is right. why have you made know claim against Ghandi, st. Theresa, you need to
grow up.