Just another WordPress.com site

By George! Oh Well! War? Psy..No Why?

Since the truth, as is it’s nature, will be revealed, whether we “Like” it or not, better we peel the layers of the ONiON by our very selves, eh?

And does not matter which way you look, war seems to be on the menu. If it has not hit one’s part of the world yet, it’s because someone has decided that it’s just not time for you to be warred on, yet.

That is a truth…..At least for the collective.

For the individual, it is entirely a matter of vibration. If we vibrate the frequency of violence, violence will come and find us. If we vibrate the frequency of Shanti (peace) Shanti will come and find us….

Some years ago, I had a strong feeling of a huge vibrational fork in the road coming up, where we as sentients would make choices that would decide for a long time what our egg-zis-tenses would be like. Sort of a high-road/low road choice point if you will….

That, in my estimation, is what 2012 was all about. That was the big shift, the tectonic event that largely went un-noticed. Do you know which road you chose? The thing about these forks in the road is that the farther you go down a particular path, the harder it is to backtrack if you think you actually wanted to go the udder way. Picture a herd bifurcating and how hard it would be to reverse tracks on a narrow road…..

So the game is and always has been a vibrational one, as was this great vibrational one. And there are con-trolling forces who will have us choose the road that is filled with violence, and the frequency of violence. This via televised wars, televised police brutality, televised fake blood false flags, violent video games, violent music, violent sport….

You get the drift. The vibrational shift is between choosing a life-positive vibe vs. a death positive vibe.

Incidentally, nothing wrong with either, if it is really your wont. If blood and gore and death metal is REALLY your thing and you live it fully, then that is probably what this trip around the life-wheel is/was all about for you. No right/wrong judgement, but the important thing is this…

To make the appropriate choices, you have to know your true self….

Watch this, or as much of this as you feel called to….it’s 4 years old, just as an FYI 😉

So, Main Stream Media, inclusive of TeeVee, Radio, Games, Music, Movies, all of it, is pushing all of it’s consumers into a war mind-set….

If you know/think you are immune, perhaps you might want to think again? Because in this twisted world of backwards is forwards, war is peace, ignorance is strength….unless you are really riding the bucking steed of hyper-awareness, you’re probably being propagandized whether you like it or not. Whether you want it or not.

So, kill your TV, burn the trash that passes for putrid papers and the kill bill games if you play them, even just for a leedle pleasure…or DON”T ….

All good…

But give a read to this, because Fiction is fact (and trust me or don’t but most fact is currently pure Fiction)…. From George Orwell’s 1984…

Why WAR?

Read it through, our current meta-world sate in two (and a bit) very well written (of course, he was an insider, he knew) para-graphs…

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

The primary aim of modern warfare is to use up the products of the machine without raising the general standard of living. Ever since the end of the nineteenth century, the problem of what to do with the surplus of consumption goods has been latent in industrial society. From the moment when the machine first made its appearance it was clear to all thinking people that the need for human drudgery, and therefore to a great extent for human inequality, had disappeared. If the machine were used deliberately for that end, hunger, overwork, dirt, illiteracy, and disease could be eliminated within a few generations. And in fact, without being used for any such purpose, but by a sort of automatic process — by producing wealth which it was sometimes impossible not to distribute — the machine did raise the living standards of the average humand being very greatly over a period of about fifty years at the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth centuries. But it was also clear that an all-round increase in wealth threatened the destruction — indeed, in some sense was the destruction — of a hierarchical society. In a world in which everyone worked short hours, had enough to eat, lived in a house with a bathroom and a refrigerator, and possessed a motor-car or even an aeroplane, the most obvious and perhaps the most important form of inequality would already have disappeared. If it once became general, wealth would confer no distinction. It was possible, no doubt, to imagine a society in which wealth, in the sense of personal possessions and luxuries, should be evenly distributed, while power remained in the hands of a small privileged caste. But in practice such a society could not long remain stable. For if leisure and security were enjoyed by all alike, the great mass of human beings who are normally stupefied by poverty would become literate and would learn to think for themselves; and when once they had done this, they would sooner or later realize that the privileged minority had no function, and they would sweep it away. In the long run, a hierarchical society was only possible on a basis of poverty and ignorance.

To return to the agricultural past, as some thinkers about the beginning of the twentieth century dreamed of doing, was not a practicable solution. It conflicted with the tendency towards mechanization which had become quasi-instinctive throughout almost the whole world, and moreover, any country which remained industrially backward was helpless in a military sense and was bound to be dominated, directly or indirectly, by its more advanced rivals. Nor was it a satisfactory solution to keep the masses in poverty by restricting the output of goods. This happened to a great extent during the final phase of capitalism, roughly between 1920 and 1940. The economy of many countries was allowed to stagnate, land went out of cultivation, capital equipment was not added to, great blocks of the population were prevented from working and kept half alive by State charity. But this, too, entailed military weakness, and since the privations it inflicted were obviously unnecessary, it made opposition inevitable. The problem was how to keep the wheels of industry turning without increasing the real wealth of the world. Goods must be produced, but they must not be distributed. And in practice the only way of achieving this was by continuous warfare. The essential act of war is destruction, not necessarily of human lives, but of the products of human labour. War is a way of shattering to pieces, or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable, and hence, in the long run, too intelligent. Even when weapons of war are not actually destroyed, their manufacture is still a convenient way of expending labour power without producing anything that can be consumed. A Floating Fortress, for example, has locked up in it the labour that would build several hundred cargo-ships. Ultimately it is scrapped as obsolete, never having brought any material benefit to anybody, and with further enormous labours another Floating Fortress is built.

In principle the war effort is always so planned as to eat up any surplus that might exist after meeting the bare needs of the population. In practice the needs of the population are always underestimated, with the result that there is a chronic shortage of half the necessities of life; but this is looked on as an advantage. It is deliberate policy to keep even the favoured groups somewhere near the brink of hardship, because a general state of scarcity increases the importance of small privileges and thus magnifies the distinction between one group and another. By the standards of the early twentieth century, even a member of the Inner Party lives an austere, laborious kind of life. Nevertheless, the few luxuries that he does enjoy his large, well-appointed flat, the better texture of his clothes, the better quality of his food and drink and tobacco, his two or three servants, his private motor-car or helicopter—set him in a different world from a member of the Outer Party, and the members of the Outer Party have a similar advantage in comparison with the submerged masses whom we call ’the proles’. The social atmosphere is that of a besieged city, where the possession of a lump of horseflesh makes the difference between wealth and poverty. And at the same time the consciousness of being at war, and therefore in danger, makes the handing-over of all power to a small caste seem the natural, unavoidable condition of survival.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

See? Y’see how it goes?

And if you felt a tingle in your truth-sense-o-meter as you read that, then watch this…to understand how un-natural war is.

Share this:

Related

I had been asking lately, what should I be doing more of? What should I be doing less of? This post is a great reminder for me to continue purging the little remaining violent video games left in my life. I love strategy games. They are mostly based on war.

Excellent move regarding the games Jorge….everything helps in the vibrational shift…and yes, the video was mind-boggling to me when I first saw it, even though I thought I knew/understood what manufactured consent meant…

Vivek, you said in the 2012 video, “Everything designed for us is bad for us. … They don’t have natural flow.” I think you are absolutely correct, and I experienced the truth of this in a very poignant way recently. My dear, sweet significant other, who was 18 years my elder, a brilliant electrical engineer (specializing in RF) in his day and an infectiously lovely personality (putting into question why he took up with the likes of me!), completed his last 12 years of life with a diagnosis of “Parkinson’s disease.” Well, there was some “dementia” that came with the package (albeit I was in denial about it until very near the end, which came in 2014, but read on for my defense). I was both fascinated and horrified to observe that the first significant manifestations of his loss of “normal cognition” appeared as 1) a forgetting how to use a toilet and 2) a forgetting how to get onto and off of a bed. As soon as these “symptoms” started, I realized that the problem was not really in my sweetheart’s brain, but rather in the de-sign of toilets and beds. They are among the stupidest objects with which we have been trained to interface.

Wow Anastasia, I was wondering why you had disappeared from here, now I know and am so sorry to hear of his troubles and passing. I’m sure the RF work must have had something to do with what happened…big hugs to you….and anytime you want to come and visit Mother India, let me know…you are welcome in my home and space…

Thank you for your condolences, V. I agree that his work with RF might have been a major factor in the damaging of his brain earlier on. It also probably didn’t help that one day in his late 30s or early 40s, before I met him, he was electrocuted in the lab. The equipment he was working with was on a raised platform and it is believed that the shock stopped his heart. He then fell off the platform and flat on his back onto the floor below, which it is believed restarted his heart. Methinks a whole lot of dopamine producing neurons were killed that day. By the time I met him, he was already having unusually animated dreams and was sleep-walking.

Regarding the choosing of one of the two forks in the path, I think it’s pretty much already predestined at birth (which, in turn, is determined by where one left off in the previous incarnation) which fork one will take. This can possibly be changed, in the case of a person who naturally will take the materialism fork, if the parents are sufficiently enlightened to give the child a proper education. Bottom line is that I don’t think it’s a matter of showing the adult the two forks and asking them to choose one or the other. There’s no choice at that point.

Ah but we do ALWAYS have choice A, always….if I was to give up smoking today, by choice, my whole life changes. If a meat-eater quits meat, everything changes. If a TeeVee watcher stops watching TeeVee, everything changes….Choice is as constant as change in our lives…..

Yep, I reread 1984 (and Brave New World) about 3 years ago as part of my research about where we are headed. The passage you have posted is chilling in its prediction of the use of modern warfare as a mechanism for mind control and creating demand for products. About to watch the video now.

I watched the video, which lead me to try the Key. I was able to control my awareness of the multiple fingers, which I think is because I have been training my body to feel my heartbeat throughout my entire body. While I was doing the Key, I felt a rush of energy in my third (first) eye. How does one progress in this practice?

Excellent Dave…this is one of those practices that just keeps on unfolding. One of these days, I’ll put out a part 2, for the moment, ignore specific “happenings” and just focus on the fingertips….it will begin to “unfold” so to speak….

V, you wrote:
“Ah but we do ALWAYS have choice A, always….if I was to give up smoking today, by choice, my whole life changes. If a meat-eater quits meat, everything changes. If a TeeVee watcher stops watching TeeVee, everything changes….Choice is as constant as change in our lives…..”

Well, yes, of course, *mathematically* there is always a 50% probability one will choose either of two possible paths, but I submit that there’s much more to it than just math. Our psychology is a huge predictor of which path we will choose, don’t you think? I think the point you’re making is that one can always choose the option that will change our lives — and all lives — for the better, but if one is not yet capable of foreseeing those consequences, or if ignorance of the possibilities for improvement or fear of the unknown loom larger in the psyche than the expectation of “positive” change, then we’ll choose the habitual, familiar and predictable with a much greater probability than 50%.

On another subject (but not really, ‘cuz it’s all connected), if you could apply your brilliant mind to the question of psychological depression at some point in your future esoteric musings, I would be very much interested in what you come up with. I’m a lifelong sufferer, but I refuse to believe it’s always due to some spontaneous or inborn defect in the brain (though this might be true for a small number of cases) and that the solution is some carefully isolated and targeted drug. I suspect it’s actually somehow related to sensitivity to the “worlds behind the world” or a developing sense of non-duality, but I am far from nailing down a solid, testable theory and even further from concocting a cure. Maybe the finger-to-finger practice? 🙂

good evening, i just watched both vids in this post, the propaganda one first as I am becoming more and more disconcerted with what is presented to me. When I watched your video about the key a strange thing happened. After you mentioned the 5 pads i tried it and watched most of your viideo with fingers touching. I meditate in a basic way often and certainly felt ‘something’ with my fingers connected. About 7 minutes in to your video a strange effect occurred which made me question what I was seeing. When your hands were moving about they were stuttering in a similar way to an effect i saw in a bruce lee movie…way of the dragon i think. your voice stayed a constant rate but not the video image didn’t.
first thoughts were to watch it again to either prove or disprove what i had seen. then i thought that it didn’t matter if i watched it again because the artifact ocurred the first time and there was no guarnatee that it would occur again. Then i wondered if you had inserted a ‘graphic’ for affect and decided that you most likely didn’t. It was an interesting thought process.
Anyhoo, your message about balance resonated with me especially because I paused the video at around the 30 min mark to have dinner and what turned into a difficult conversation with my wife about how our history is still affecting our future. I am a big fan of syncronicity and it felt right to get some explanantion of our situation fomr your video so thanks for that.
I will be looking for your book in the near future and will continue to follow your blogs aither by accident or when you post on zerohedge.
here’s to balance
Paul

Very interesting Paul…there is a small piece (10 seconds) where effects are used, but as you say, the moment was the moment…perhaps a shift for you in some way…as for past present and the ever unfolding present we call the future, yes yes….the thread is unbroken and thus all is connected…will announce the book here, early January, all going well, thanks for sharing…

A note about comments

Greetings. This being a place to primarily exchange ideas, I thought I'd share a few pointers for comments, which in my mind would result in a healthy exchange of ideas.
a) 0 profanity policy. Any curse word, even if #$%$ will lead to automatic deletion. They are un-necessary.
b) if posting a link, whether to your own blog or otherwise, please ensure that you are keeping with the theme of the post you are commenting on and have something original to say in that regard. Sometimes just a link works fine too and oftentimes an off-topic tug is needed. But good to keep in mind as a general guiding principle.
c) 0 ad homenim policy. needless and dialouge destroying. If you have not found a way to move beyond the messenger, then that should be priority one, before commenting.
Appreciate the understanding and against censorship.
Regards all around a big thank you to all the folks who have come by and engaged.