https://software.intel.com/de-de/forums/topic/337018/feed
deHi, thanks for you comments.https://software.intel.com/de-de/comment/1714917#comment-1714917
<a id="comment-1714917"></a>
<div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even" property="content:encoded"><p>Hi, thanks for you comments.</p>
<p>However, my question was why the sample applications use the registry setting while my own application does not use it, and what I can do about that? I'm aware that there is a distance/detection quality tradeoff, but nonetheless I want to increase detection distance for testing.</p>
</div></div></div>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 09:40:05 +0000pfccomment 1714917 at https://software.intel.comQuestion1: Face pose is nothttps://software.intel.com/de-de/comment/1714884#comment-1714884
<a id="comment-1714884"></a>
<div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even" property="content:encoded"><p>Question1: Face pose is not supported at this time.<br />
Question2: 100cm is close to the camera limit. This is probably why you don't much difference. The activation distance establishes a virtual plane. Anything within this plane will trigger hand tracking. Thus changing is to a bigger value will make hand tracking easier but on the down side there will be false hand tracking. The default value is 40cm. It is not recommended that applications change this value. We want to make sure that end users have consistent experience across all applications. </p>
</div></div></div>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 01:55:39 +0000mad\xwu2comment 1714884 at https://software.intel.com