Luke Rudkowski discusses WTC Building 7 once again with Larry Silverstein

There are so many unanswered questions about the days 9/11, and instead of making up theories and speculating, we go to the horse’s mouth to get answers; sadly the response we get from these questions only invites more speculation about what happened on 9/11.

Really pleased to see Luke getting in Silverstein's face again. He kept his cool, was polite and still got manhandled. Which is evidence of something in itself.

Next time I reckon he should just ask 'Can you tell us what you meant by 'pull it' in the 2002 PBS documentary?'
I reckon he won't even answer that. He has probably been told not to speak about the comment at all, as to not incriminate himself. I imagine he would not even reiterate his spokespersons explanation.

And if there's nothing to the 'pull it' comment, why does an aide at the side of him anxiously jump in there looking worried???

I had an appointment to teach a group class today on the 36th floor of 120 Broadway in NYC. It was my 1st time at the location.
So a short walk down a hallway from the elevator lead to a wing with two doors.

One door to my destination, the other…

I was praying I'd see Lucky Larry in the elevator. "Maybe the smartest thing to do is press L for lobby. And so we pressed L and watched the elevator go down".

Why would someone purchase the lease on a group of buildings which were losing money during a recession, required hundreds of $millions in retrofitting to remove asbestos to conform to codes, and then take out insurance on each building separately against terrorist attacks, which just happened to (most conveniently) happen a few weeks later?

If I, or any other person of ordinary means, bought a business that was losing money, insured the premises against fire, and suddenly the factory was burned to the ground, what would happen by default? The FBI and fire department would be turning the place over with a fine-tooth comb within seconds of the fire been doused, and I (or any other person of ordinary means) would be the PRIME SUSPECT in a case of arson... on account of motive and common sense, before any forensic analysis had been even started.

Would it not be a reasonable expectation for the FDNY and the FBI to have maybe (possibly, perhaps) raised its eyebrows just a little, or maybe, (possibly, conceivably) even go as far as suggesting an *inquiry* (what's that?), or in an absolutely perfect world, conducting an *investigation* into the insurance aspects of the attack on the World Trade Center?