Maximal power

167 >
117 hp

The Chevrolet has 43 percent more horsepower than Mitsubishi ASX SUV. The Chevrolet Captiva II SUV will be distinctly faster speed up owing to bigger horsepower. Also overtaking cars or obstacles while moving along the road should be a piece of cake for a vehicle equipped with more powerful engine.

Maximal torque

230 >
152 Nm

The Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual has 78 newton meters more torque than the Mitsubishi ASX SUV. Even though a great deal of people do not appreciate the maximum torque when choosing a automobile, it describes the best how fast a car acclerates. As far as these two vehicles are cars the difference is relevant thus the Chevrolet will deliver you better feeling of driving.

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.5 >
11.4 s

The Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h in 10.5 s, which is 0.9 s when compared to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. But the difference is not as much significant to be taken into consideration when buying a vehicle.

Trunk capacity

943 >
418 l

The boot of the Chevrolet Captiva II is 126 percent larger in relation to the Mitsubishi. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV will be much more handy. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can take.

Top speed

190 >
183 km/h

The maximum speed of the ​​Chevrolet is greater than this of the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual by 4, which allows the Chevrolet Captiva II to overcome quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 4 % is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.

Width

1,868 >
1,770 mm

The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Chevrolet Captiva II is 6 % wider when compared to the Mitsubishi ASX. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.

Fuel tank

Wheelbase

2,697 >
2,676 mm

The wheelbase of a car equals the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Chevrolet has 1 percent longer wheelbase distance in relation to Mitsubishi. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Chevrolet Captiva II SUV should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.

Number of gears

6 >
5 gears

The Chevrolet have a higher gear count in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX which means
that Chevrolet Captiva II would achieve
faster speeding up and better fuel
economy. But the difference is quiet
little and unless you are drag
racing at a timed event you would not
observe the difference.

Engine capacity

2,384 >
1,589 cc

The engine capacity of the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV is by 50 percent larger in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV. In a consequence the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual will consume less fuel, however, the engine of the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual will be of better performance, working more smoothly and more durable.

Gross trailer weight

Length

4,668 >
4,296 mm

The Chevrolet is 372 mm longer in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX. Long cars more of passenger space and in most cases provide bigger trunk. Although the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV occurs to be better for families or persons who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mitsubishi ASX may be more appropriate to women as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.

Rear track

Model release date

2011 >
2010

Given that the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual started to be manufactured only 1 year before the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV, the gap between technology used in both cars shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV may have slightly more modern solutions applied in it.

Height

1,727 >
1,615 mm

If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Chevrolet Captiva II, which is by 7 % higher than the Mitsubishi, would be better pick for you. However, compared vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.

Average consumption

6.2 >
8.9 l

The fuel economy is distinctly to Mitsubishi ASX SUV's advantage. This automobile consumes 30 percent fewer gasoline in the combined cycle than the Chevrolet Captiva II SUV 2.4 DOHC 167HP manual. Note that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the small off-road 4x4 class, in which the Mitsubishi is classified, is 7.5 l while the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual burns up by 17 % less fuel than the average.

Urban consumption

7.8 >
11.7 l

The Mitsubishi ASX uses of 3.9 l fuel fewer while driving inside city in comparison to the Chevrolet Captiva II. The Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual, as a representative of mini 4x4 segment, uses of 1.8 l of fuel for every 100 km less than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “small off-road 4x4” segment equals to 9.6 l per 100 km.

Maximal torque RPM

3,995 >
4,605 revolutions/minute

The rotational speed where the maximum torque is produced indicates how fast an engine reaches its full efficiency with growth in rmp. The lower rmp or the wider range in which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration should be felt earlier.