Wimbledon 2007 final-Nadal was the better player in this day! Atleast in the first four sets! Roger was lucky to win those two sets(set 1 and set 3)in tiebreakers!This match should not have reached this fifth set! One of the best matches of Nadal that I've ever seen (despite the loss)!

- edberg vs chang, RG 1989 (but i'd like to give another slam to chang as i wouldn't want to let him slamless)
- ivanisevic vs agassi, W 1992 (but the bad thing that we wouldn't have as much drama for W 2001 !)

2009 Wimbledon Final. I thought Roddick worked alot harder throughout the year and deserved the title more.

Click to expand...

I agree. Its one of those situations where a loss really would not have hurt Federer as bad as it did Roddick. Federer would refocus to win Slam # 15. That would have completed Roddick's career. Winning 1 Slam during the peak of the Nadal/Federer era is a phenomenal achievement.

Also, the 1984 French Open final. If McEnroe beats Lendl that day, we are putting Mac into a whole different class. Lendl would have had more chances at the French.

Wimbledon 2007 final-Nadal was the better player in this day! Atleast in the first four sets! Roger was lucky to win those two sets(set 1 and set 3)in tiebreakers!This match should not have reached this fifth set! One of the best matches of Nadal that I've ever seen (despite the loss)!

Click to expand...

That's a good one!

I would change Sampras/Federer whatever year that it was so that they wouldn't have deified Fed.

no, because then you would also have to change the results of AO 09 :/

Click to expand...

I said in my first post that I would change the Wim 08 final because I feel that win would of allowed him to run off 4 straight slams. When I said that someone said actually it would have been 6 in a row. He was referring to consecutive Wimbledons while I was thinking he would win Wim 08 to FO 09.

AO 2009 by far. Wimbledon 2008 belonged to Nadal, it felt like it was destiny for him to finally win it. He also outplayed Federer for much of that final and was simply brilliant at some points in the match. AO 2009, on the other hand, felt to me more like a Federer loss than a Nadal victory. To me, Federer truly gave that match away and it was always in his hands. He outplayed Nadal from the baseline, won more overall points (despite barely winning any in the 5th), and he was just the better player in the majority of the match. Couldn't win the big points though, and that's where Nadal took advantage.