In a Man's World

In A Man’s World
Nora Ephron, screenplay writer once stated that, “Above all, be the heroine of your life, not the victim.”
She was born out of fire, in circumstances that were not even expecting her, had a complexion which was considered inferior, washed her hair in the blood of the people she held responsible for her fate, followed her husbands because of her love for them rather the duty which ordained, was called Sairandhri (literally meaning the perfect maid) and finally fell on the way to Heaven without getting help from any of her husbands (she had five) except Bheema. She was considered the most virtuous and was known to have a magnetic charm with inexorably pulled men and women towards her. She did these deeds and possessed these qualities – All in a Man’s World.
If one gets into the mind of Draupadi, one will immediately start wondering if she had the time to even look at herself as a victim. In the face of the Assembly Hall where a few moments prior, her clothes were almost ripped off, she asks NOT for revenge on the person acting, the audience witnessing or the person responsible but she asks for the freedom of her husbands when Drithrashtra offers her 3 boons, such is the strength of Yajnaseni (born out of fire). She has not given the world permission to call her a victim. Her troubles are a result of a destructive cocktail of her actions, fate and Dharma peppered with the ideologies of patriarchy.
All human actions have one or more of these seven causes: chance, nature, compulsions, habit, reason, passion, desire.
Aristotle
Draupadi’s actions showed a serious disregard for the accepted customs and norms. She challenged, refused, refuted, hurled insults and questioned. A woman does not question; she accepts be it good or bad; she does not mock; she does not laugh in the company of men; she does not refuse the contestants of a Swayamvar; she does not refuse to be a commodity of her husband; she does not fall for the enemy; she is a woman; she must live like a woman. Krsna had literally challenged all of these norms by the end of Mahabharata. There is nothing wrong in challenging except maybe the consequences.
At her Swayamwar Draupadi chooses to insult Karna by refusing to be a wife of “Suta Putra”. In Palace Of Illusions Divakaruni suggests that Draupadi did that as an impulsive action, this incident though became one of the major reasons why Karna supported Duryodhana when he ordered Dushasana to disrobe her in the Assembly Hall. Another instance of her action which made this incident a consequence was the comment made by her when Duryodhana accidently fell into a pool in Indraprastha. She said, “Andhey ka putra Andha” which translates to “Like blind father like blind son” and even though it sounds like an elementary school insult, those were sensitive times and women were not supposed to be brave enough to me comments on princes and kings. This was enough reason for him to harbour hate against her and act against her. Revenge is after all the driving force behind a lot of wars and banes.
“Unseen in the background, Fate was quietly slipping lead into the boxing-glove.”
― P.G. Wodehouse
Mahabharata compels us to believe that everything that we go through and everything that happens to us is fate though as Dr. Madhu Gupta points out the “spirit of Mahabharata is not fatalistic”. Draupadi since the moment was born was referred to as being born for the destruction of the Kauravas and Kshatriyas. Already destined to have five husbands because of a milieu of reasons (never-ending lust, cruel fate, boon by Parvati etc.); she accepted her destiny and worked relentlessly to keep her husbands happy. The fate of the war also seemed to be predecided by Krishna and other celestial Devas. The tragedy of the characters lay in the fact that they were not aware of their own sealed fate. Calvinistic notions of Predestination immediately come to mind when Indian mythological texts are talked about. This silent acceptance of one’s fate is an extremely disturbing point of this great epic even though she questions her fate; it seems to be accepted by a larger part of the “audience”. If there had been no game of dicing there would be no betting and no disrobing hence the war would not have taken place at all. It just seemed like one big conspiracy to clear out a race of corrupt human beings.
One who sees the Dharma sees me.
One who sees me sees the Dharma. * Buddha
The concept of dharma is very broad and is very difficult to grasp because there is no clear-cut definition of dharma that captures the essence of it. The basic purpose is that when the scales tip whilst balancing between Dharma and Adharma then Gods descend upon the Earth to set things straight by hook or by crook. Yudhishthir or rather Dharamraj is the reason for the trouble that poor Panchaali goes through. It was his Dharam which prevented him from refusing the challenge posed by Duryodhana. Sakuni was sure of victory and knew that once challenged the eldest Pandav cannot refuse. Dharma is not a negative thing nor is it supposed to be but the circumstances in which it is used make it negative. For example during the battle Ashwatthama the elephant dies and Yudhisthir tells Drona that the warrior has passed away and since it is a universal fact that Dharamraj cannot speak what is not true, Drona believes him and is killed off by Drishtadyumana. Somehow even in this situation it is the Dharma of the Kauravas which is judged. Another flaw of the flawless - Was there no Dharma regarding how women are to be treated? On surfing through Google and other search engines all one could find was how a wife should behave and what should be her Dharma, her duties as a wife, there is no questioning that she “belongs” to the husband much like a piece of furniture after marriage to the said “husband”. Milton’s Paradise Lost paints a better picture of the role of a husband than Indian epics ever could! Where was the Dharma of humanity when a Goddess reincarnate was dragged by her hair into an Assembly Hall full of men, one wonders if there is even such a thing as Dharma of humanity.
Women are the victims of this patriarchal culture, but they are also its carriers. Let us keep in mind that every oppressive man was raised in the confines of his mother's home.
Shirin Ebadi
Ebadi makes a compelling point; she targets the source of the problem. But the problem lies in the roots of the mother herself. Gandhari so bound by patriarchy that she ties a cloth on her eyes simply because her husband is blind! One cannot help but wonder wouldn’t she have been of more “use” if she could see. On the other matriarchal structure you have Kunti who silently watched while her husband got another wife and as critics say, tested poor Draupadi’s culinary skills when she first came home. With mothers like these one can’t really expect the boys to behave like sensitive sane human beings. Dushashana’s brilliant act of dragging Draupadi by her hair in a hall full of men and then trying to disrobe her is enough evidence that there was a severe power lust and superiority complex in his mind. How dare a woman refuse to pay heed to what the male power wants? The other corner occupied by the luminous Yudhishthir who gambles away cattle, castle and finally the consort. One cannot challenge Iravati Karve when she states that a woman suffers publically, gets called a “whore” in front of an Assembly Hall then is packed off to the forest because of her Dharma as a wife is in itself a huge instance of patriarchy. At the same time the fact that she questioned Yudhishthir instead of silently accepting her fate is enough to suggest that she was willing to let patriarchy and Dharma co-exist with feminism and individuality. Most critics would agree that the nearly all dynamic characters of literature have a duality which is internalized.
Draupadi is the most complex and controversial female character in Hindu literature. She can play the role of a woman, nurse, maid, wife, mother and a mother – in – law with equal ease and grace. At the same time she can question, raise her voice against the people “responsible” for her, embodies the spirit of Roman Furies, the Goddess Kali, the beautiful Ahalya and designs a set of virtues of her own. She secretly vowed that one day she would definitely seek vendetta on the injustice meted out to her. She did it by igniting the spark of revenge in the hearts of the Pandavas. At the same time one could say Krishna used her to annihilate the Kauravas. Either way she was the major catalyst in one of the most glorious battles ever seen by Hindu mythology. She is known and held responsible for a battle which not only killed off some brave men but also some solid misconceptions like Dharma, patriarchy and fate. In a world of men, she did more than a man could. She purified.
Sources:
* http://hinduism.iskcon.org/practice/703.htm * www.wikipedia.org * www.goodreads.com * http://magickcircle.forumotion.com/t459-the-theme-of-dharma-in-the-mahabharata * Iravati Karve’s “Draupadi” * “Draupadi’s Question” * Palace Of Illusion - Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni…...

Similar Documents

...Lauren Vandiver
Mr. Keeton
English 102
29 October 2012
Man’s Best Friend
Recently, I read that in some religions, it is felt that when a pet owner is ill, the animal can take on the illness to help in healing their owner. While many pet owners claim that their pets actually do make them feel better, there are still some skeptics. However, research studies show that pets do have a very positive impact on various aspects of our health. In fact, for nearly 25 years, studies have correlated pet ownership with the following health benefits: lower blood pressure and cholesterol levels, better psychological health, lower heart attack rates, higher survival rates, enhanced self-esteem and social interaction. So as people take care of their companion animals, the animals are in turn taking care of their owners. Dog owners would tell you how their best friend would snuggle up close to them for comfort and follow them everywhere and know well their routines such as feeding time and the time when their owners return from work. Experts say that pets are very therapeutic and can even prolong the lives of a human being, especially elderly or these widowed and living alone. Among the several emotional and physical benefits of owning a pet, these animals can form very close bonds with their human owners and in fact dogs are even known as men's best friend.
Primarily, owning a pet serves as a wonderful way to rediscover a sense of purpose. It helps people feel needed and wanted. ......

...Anita Coit
History 101 – Webcourse
Jordan, Winthrop D. The White Man’s Burden. New York: Oxford University Press, 1974
The author Winthrop D. Jordan’s The White Man’s Burden explores the reasons for racism in America. He goes all the way back to the first contacts that the Europeans had with Africans. The belief was that the color “Black” has negative meanings, there was a strong belief which was that black was dirty, ugly, evil and a symbol of the devil. He suggests that maybe because white men came to know black men around the same time they encountered the great ape that these men believed that there was a connection between the two. This came about because Africa served as a good habitat for apes (gorillas, monkeys). They also felt that black men were sexually aggressive as were apes in Africa. Jordan also noted that Thomas Jefferson felt that black and white men were human beings that were created equal, but he also questioned the black man’s intelligence, but why did he still own slaves.
In the beginning the Englishmen found that African’s were very different from them. Due to their skin color and features “Negros looked different to Englishmen”. They felt because of their supposed likeness to the apes and their savage behavior, this convinced the British that the Africans were more like animals than humans. This brought them to the conclusion that like animals the Africans should be captured and contained. Slave traders in Africa handled Negros the......

...To me “The White Man’s Burden” refers to the idea of colonization and the need and desire to do so. That it was white man’s destiny and responsibility to colonize. The “White Man’s Burden” by Kipling was his artistic take on the Americans attempting to colonize the Philippines. The thought was that the white man was put on earth to make the rest of the world that same as them and it was a “burden” to bear. Europeans justified racist policies in their imperial ventures by having the mindset that they were benefiting the colonized land. The imperialist people were very ethnocentric and thought that their ideas and way of life was the better way of life and by forcing it upon the other nations they were giving them a better life.
In “The Gold Watch” by Mulk Raj Anand portrays roles that are similar to the ideas of imperialism. He relates the social hierarchy of Indian to the relationship of colonized people to the people colonizing. The story depicts the idea that even if you are on the lower end and feel less meaningful (colonized) you still respect what you do and desire to keep doing it.
Reading the excerpt from “Heart of Darkness” by Joseph Conrad you get the idea that he did not agree with what most Europeans believed about colonization and taking over another nation. He felt it was brutal and unnecessary.
The short story (A Drink in the Passage) by Alan Paton to me also is a negative reaction to the ideology of Europe at the time thinking that they have the......

...
Hana Al Shamsi
44166
Informative Speech
Wanted: Prince Charming
“The warm bronze sand feels like silk falling through my fingers. The sunset is so beautiful; the orange red sky looks make believe. The water is hitting the rocks so hard, yet the sound is so peaceful. As a breeze blows against me, my hair brushes along my shoulder causing me to shiver. He notices my goose bumps, he moves closer. I feel the thumps of his heartbeat against my back. He moves closer, so close I can actually feel his warm breath against me. I do not think there could be any better feeling. I am wrong. He comes closer; close enough I can hear him breathing in my ear. My mind is in a different world… I can’t hear the water anymore, I am now holding my breath, anticipating. And now, finally he whispers into my ear three magical words.” So, you must be thinking, how can a girl like me feel that? Its simple, I will give you the guideline on how to win your Prince, correct me if I am wrong gentlemen, so listen up Cinderella! Today I’ll be talking about the three factors that every woman should keep in mind when trying to win a guy, which is the external factor, the internal factor, and last but not least, her attitude.
According to Crystal Mazzuca, its very easy to get any mans attention by the way you dress, especially since guys are visual. Therefore, dress to impress. Revealing clothes will get you attention, but will it get you the right kind of attention? A girl loves to feel that are all......

...Analysis: The white man’s burden
The white man’s burden is a poem written by Rudyard Kipling, a British author and poet with ori- gins in the British India. The poem was written in 1899 when Rudyard Kipling was 34 years old – it was posted in the magazine McClure’s with the subtitle “United States and the Philippine Islands”.
“Take up the white man’s burden Send forth the best ye breed. Go bind your sons to exile To serve your captives need.” (Kipling; The white man’s burden; 1st stanza pt. 1)
The poem is a quite long description of the burden mentioned in the title and refers to a bur- den, which the “white man” has put on his own shoulders. It is rather satirical when read, as the poem indirectly can be interpreted as a discrimination of the white mans (British) imperialistic in- spirations and perhaps even megalomania – as one might have expected from the author. The mean- ing of the title is interpreted as following:
The burden of the white man is to “serve his captives need” as written in the first stanza. By this, Kipling refers to how the white man, with a perhaps imperialistic ideology, is to rule the people suppressed by the British colonies, later described as “new-caught, sullen peoples, half-devil and half-child” (Kipling; TWMB, 1st stanza pt. 2). This description of the captives is a caricatured pic- ture of what Kipling believes the white man saw his captives as, while implying the satiric element of the poem. Kipling presents the imperialistic view of the...

...In relation to World War One poetry, “Dead Man’s Dump” by Isaac Rosenberg and “Attack” by Siegfried Sassoon, I agree that thematic concerns are developed through the extensive use of symbolism and imagery. A poet is an artist and the poetry he writes is his art. The words he uses to write them, however, are the ever so essential paint brushes and tools used to create art. Through their meticulous choice of words, Rosenberg and Sassoon effectively conveyed their outlook on the concept of way and helped myself, the reader, to understand the destructive nature of war. Thus, the use of imagery and symbolism is imperative in order for the reader to fully understand their argument.
“Dead Man’s Dump” follows the journey of a limber navigating through a scene of horror littered with “sprawled dead.” One of the key themes developed in “Dead Man’s Dump” through the use of symbolism and imagery is the idea of war stripping an individual of any power or control. War is symbolically depicted as a “shrieking pyre” that the soldiers were “flung on” to. This is a direct metaphor towards war being a ‘dead man’s dump’ and helps us understand that Rosenberg perceives war as a funeral pyre because war instigates death and the men who are drafted in war might as well be “flung on to a shrieking pyre.” The limber that is carrying the “rusty freight” or barbed wires is embodied as “many crowns of thorns… stuck out… over the shattered track/ Upon our brothers dear.” This religious allusion is......

...Freud’s Drive theory he illustrates that all emphasis is put on the psyche filtering all aspects of participation in life. So what is this Psyche/Soul that Freud speaks of. Is it of this world or not of this world? I get the feeling that Freud would not answer that as straightforward as I would like. I feel that he would agree it is where our humanness and the divine interact in a dance that only lives in the present moment. Yet his passion for history has definitely given him a blueprint for the development of behavior and humanity. Freud’s renunciation of God would be to easy to associate with the political powers at the time, he was a true student of Man and behavior which I feel ultimately led to his not wanting to take credit away from man and give it to a Faith that would never be understood.
It is clear that Freud was deeply interested in prehistory: the prehistory of the modern world, which he sought to discover in ancient Egypt, Greece, and Rome; the pre history of individual man, for which he searched in the childhood of the individual and in the individual’s unconscious; the prehistory of the human race, which he sought to understand through the customs of primitive man;… Psychoanalysis is plainly an idiographic science, utilizing unique historical occurrences to provide a view of man’s development and behavior.” Bettleheim, B., 1984 p. 43.
All the trying to understand, fix, control or change our experience is on the mental level. This is where Freud’s......

...the only thing on earth that loves you more than he loves himself.”
― Josh Billings
Why dog is a man’s best friend?
A big reason why Dogs are a man’s best friend is dog can give happiness on our lives and dogs are a loving companion in a man’s life. Dogs are important to a man’s life because they give joy to us, dogs can teach us about friendship and selflessness and, superb loyalty.
These are the reasons why man thinks that a dog is supposed to be a man’s best friend.
First is, we can trust a dog that other humans because they have an unwavering loyalty to its master and owner. Second is, a dog will never will leave you no matter what will happen to you or to him. Third is, a dog can make you laugh even if you had a bad day and he will comfort you until you become happy. A dog can give you a good health because while you are walking or exercising him in the streets, you too can exercise yourself. A dog never fails to greet you when you got home to your school or from work, even if you are tired, a dog can make you feel relaxed and less stress. A dog guards your house whenever you are out. And lastly a dog can sacrifice his life for his master whenever his master is in danger. And a dog might even die because of sadness after his master is dead. A dog is certainly a true and a loyal friend.
Therefore, I conclude and I’m very sure that it is right to call a dog man’s best friend....

...The words ‘top of the hill’ suggest the end of the journey or the ultimate goal. The final goal or destination will only be reached by means of an uphill struggle.
The word ‘only’ is used in line 3 – ‘I take with me only the sweet memories of my youth’. The speaker is ready for his journey and takes with him just what is important – his memories. His memories are his only link to the innocence of his youth, and he knows that the following day, his life is going to change forever – he will lose his childlike innocence and have to face an altered world.
The words ‘my heart aches for my mother’ could convey various meanings. The first of these could be that the young man wishes that he did not have to face the day ahead but could go back to the familiarity and security being a child. He is assuming adult responsibilities of having to worry about his mother, and does not feel ready for this. The second possibility is that the young man’s mother is dead and he misses her. This argument could be supported by the previous line ‘I take with me only the sweet memories of my youth’ in that his childhood was a happy time in his life. The final image that could be conveyed by these words is that he knows that there is heartache ahead for his mother in that he does not know what is going to happen at the end of the day, but he does not have a positive feeling about it,. The words ‘my heart aches’ could convey that he regrets the heartache that is ahead for his mother. This could be......

...Man’s Search for Meaning Book Review
There have been several books written by those who suffered in concentration camps during World War II; however, Man’s Search for Meaning by Viktor E. Frankl is the both a fascinating and hopeful book from this period. This book is comprised of two primary parts. Part one is “Experiences in a Concentration Camp,” and part two is titled “Logotherapy in a Nutshell”. There is also a postscript entitled “The Case for a Tragic Optimism”. Throughout the book, Frankl gives the readers a new perspective about to how to view life and reiterates the statement that life is utterly what you decide to make of it.
Frankl clearly states that he did not want to solely focus on the negative aspects from his stay in four different Concentration Camps including Auschwitz and Dachau but rather his own personal experience of survival. Immediately upon entering Auschwitz in 1942, he had to part ways with his prized almost completed scientific manuscript, which meant a great deal to him. Man’s Search for Meaning teaches the reader that it is possible to be positive in the most dire of situations.
There are several factors in the book that Frankl discusses that helped him survive in the camps. He noted that there are three phases of the inmate’s mental reactions to life in camp: the admission period, the period when he is deep into the camp routine, and that after his release and liberation. His camp experience seemed nothing shy of a nightmare. ......

...Reflections on Man’s Search For Meaning
INT 101
Dr. Walker
December 4 2013
Thomas Jefferson wrote – “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”1 The pursuit of happiness seems to be the end game for life, but is it? Viktor Frankl is a concentration camp survivor and goes one level deeper in his book Man’s Search For Meaning. Finding the true meaning in life is the key to self-actualization. Frankl quotes the words of Fredrich Nietzsche – “He who has a why to live for can bear almost any how.”2 Frankl reveals what life was like in the concentration camps. He also discusses Logotherapy, which he created. Frankl was subjected to four different Nazi camps and was dehumanized to a mere number: 119,104. Moreover, Nazis murdered his wife, mother, father, and unborn child, yet Frankl was able to find a purpose for living in all his sufferings. Frankl goes into detail on the concentration camps. Life was hell on earth. What appeared to him was the mind’s power to protect. The longer the stay, the more numbing all human emotion became. There are some behaviors I would like to highlight. They are strong and appear based on Frankl’s experiences in the camps.
Hope
People died daily in the camps. The guards played a finger game. They would randomly point, and if you were picked, you died. The simple act of pointing delivered your fate. Prisoners who focused on the WHY to live had a better chance at survival. Frankl determined that a youthful face and eagerness to work increased...

...This is a Man’s World
This is a Man’s World
War is mentally and physically straining. When a country goes to war it depends on its military to be up for any challenge war has to offer. 50 years ago the thought of a woman joining the ranks were laughable; today it is a reality. Women have proved that they can doubtfully be called the weaker gender, and recently have been able to serve in combat roles. Combat roles are the most dangerous and physically demanding roles the United States military has to offer. When a soldier signs up for this role they understand that they will be put on the frontline and in the line of fire from the enemy. Nature has made women physically weaker and less durable than men. A highly trained woman cannot match a man in physical strength. I served proudly alongside women for ten years in the military, but I strongly believe that they should not be able to serve in combat roles in the United States. Having them serve in such roles can have negative effects on them and the men that they serve with; lower standards, health issues, and possible harassment situations.
When women were allowed into the military many of the army standards were either lowered or vanish completely. According to head officials at West Point Academy, Cadets no longer run in boots due to the fact women were suffering from a high rate of injury (Knight, 1991). Physical training test scores were adjusted because women could not meet the basic physical requirements to stay...

...Engelsk A, 2. Delprøve fra 22. november 2013
The President of No Man’s Land
Ali Smith’s short story “The Go-Between” from 2009, taken from a collection of short stories celebrating the 60th anniversary of the UN’s adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, deals with the difficulties of managing an abstract concept of human rights in real life and the effects on the human beings involved in the execution of this Declaration .
The text is presented by a first person narrator, which very cleverly engages the reader to be a part of the story telling and leaves him with a sense of an autobiographical experience. While this is not the case, the tone is primarily self-sarcastic, which e.g. manifests itself in the generous use of the term ‘Professor’, when referring to the main character in different circumstances. (p. 4, ll. 86+102+106). The language is all together dominated by an ironic metaphorical undercurrent, using linguistic instruments to compose the themes and intention of this text. Smith uses open questions to emphasize the interaction with the reader (p.2 ll. 1+11+27). She underlines the ironic importance of a statement by including exclamation marks (p. 4, ll. 87-88), which effects the text in such a way that it almost becomes oral to the reader. The style of writing is informal and light, almost like a story being told from one friend to another. Smith manages to keep the atmosphere light and semi casual although the themes touched upon are...

...Why is OECD known as “the rich man’s club”? Does it impact only rich countries?
The OECD stands for the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. It is known as “the rich man’s club” because it is comprised of 34 of the world’s wealthiest nations (Ball, Geringer, McNett & Minor, pg. 75) and goes back to 1960, when it was comprised of 18 European countries, along with the United States and Canada. Today, developing nations such as Mexico, Chile, and Turkey have joined the OECD (TMSA). Together, these nations work together to better both themselves, as well as their fellow nations by promoting policies that will improve both the economic well being, as well as the social well being of people around the world. Think of the OECD as an open forum club for its members. Here, governments can come together and discuss common issues and find solutions to them. The one thing that all the countries in the OECD share is that they are all democratic countries and they support free market economies (oecd.org).
According to their mission, here are a few of the things the OECD does:
• Work with governments to understand what drives economic, social and environmental change
• Measure productivity and global flows of trade and investment
• Analyze and compare data to predict future trends
• Set international standards on things like agriculture and taxes
To answer the second part of the question, no, the OECD does not only impact rich countries. The policies that......

...Man’s Search for Meaning
As I began reading Victor Frankl’s book, I automatically started thinking of all the horrors and victims of the Holocaust that I had read about in other books or movies I had watched on the subject. As I read further into the book I realized that Dr. Frankl’s point was not to recount the travesties of the concentration camps but to show that man has the power to choose to continue to live and have a meaningful existence. This discussed some of the atrocities of the camps but the author did not dwell on the people whose primary jobs were to work the prisoners to death literally or to extinguish those considered inferior. He chose to use and relate examples of life that gave meaning to human suffering.
It is hard to fathom or truly understand the life in a concentration or prison camp and even harder to comprehend when a person has lost everything except his or her own bodies and free will. I was amazed that people were able to have faith that they would be rescued and not feel pity for themselves. People across the world say they are starved but in reality, most of us don’t even have a clue as to what true hunger and starvation feels like. Although I feel that Dr. Frankl’s experience is not unique, his ability to develop it into a theory was, especially under the circumstances which he began formulating his Logo therapy.
The passage, “we really had nothing now except our bare bodies - even minus hair; all we possessed, literally, was our......