Go to a specific date

Explore

The Public Inspection page
on FederalRegister.gov
offers a preview of documents scheduled to appear in the next day's
Federal Register issue. The Public Inspection page may also
include documents scheduled for later issues, at the request
of the issuing agency.

Document Details

Enhanced Content - Table of Contents

This tables of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.

Enhanced Content - Sharing

Enhanced Content - Document Print View

Enhanced Content - Document Print View

Enhanced Content - Document Tools

These tools are designed to help you understand the official document
better and aid in comparing the online edition to the print edition.

These markup elements allow the user to see how the document follows the
Document Drafting Handbook
that agencies use to create their documents. These can be useful
for better understanding how a document is structured but
are not part of the published document itself.

AGENCY:

SUMMARY:

The Department of Commerce (the Department) has received timely requests to conduct new shipper reviews of the antidumping duty order on natural bristle paintbrushes and brush heads from the People's Republic of China (PRC). In accordance with 19 CFR 351.214(d), we are initiating a review for Shanghai R&R Imp./Exp. Co., Ltd. (Shanghai) and its producer Zhejiang Lin'an Maxiao Brushes Factory (ZLMBF), and for Changshan Import/Export Co., Ltd. (Changshan) and its producer ZLMBF.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On August 14, 2003, the Department received timely requests from Shanghai and Changshan, pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) and in accordance with 19 CFR 351.214(c), for new shipper reviews under the antidumping duty order on natural bristle paintbrushes and brush heads from the PRC. This order has a February anniversary month and therefore an August semiannual anniversary month. On August 27, 2003, the Department issued a letter to Shanghai and Changshan noting that there were similarities in the new shipper review requests for both companies, and we asked whether Shanghai and Changshan were related in any way. Shanghai and Changshan, in their response of August 29, 2003, replied that the similarities occurred because the actions by both Shanghai and Changshan occurred shortly after their counsel conducted a program in China discussing the antidumping law and various ways of participating. Because of the schedule for filing new shipper review requests, both Shanghai and Changshan arranged their sales and made the shipments on relatively short notice. While there are similarities in the shipments, the two companies stated that they are not affiliated, and therefore they requested separate new shipper reviews. The Department will continue throughout the review to examine carefully any similarities between Shanghai and Changshan.

Initiation of Reviews

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(ii) and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), in their August 14, 2003 requests for review, Shanghai and Changshan certified that they did not export the subject merchandise to the United States during the period of investigation (POI) and that they are not affiliated with any company which exported subject merchandise to the United States during the POI. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(b)(ii)(B), Shanghai's and Changshan's producer, ZLMBF, certified that it did not export subject merchandise during the period of investigation. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B), Shanghai and Changshan further certified that their export activities are not controlled by the central government of the PRC. Also, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iv), Shanghai and Changshan submitted documentation establishing the date on which each company first shipped the subject merchandise to the United States, the volume of its first shipment, and the date of the first sale to an unaffiliated customer in the United States. Shanghai and Changshan also stated that they had no shipments to the United States other than their first shipment.

Therefore, in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(d), we are initiating new shipper reviews of the antidumping duty order on natural bristle paintbrushes and brush heads from the PRC. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.214(i), we intend to issue the preliminary results not later than 180 days from the date of initiation of these reviews. All provisions of 19 CFR 351.214 will apply to Shanghai and Changshan throughout the duration of these new shipper reviews.

In accordance with 19 CFR 351.214(g)(1)(i)(B), the POR for a new shipper review initiated in the month immediately following the semiannual anniversary month is the six-month period immediately preceding the semiannual anniversary month. Therefore, the POR for these new shipper reviews is February 1, 2003 through July 31, 2003. Pursuant to Start Printed Page 57876section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(d)(1), we are initiating new shipper reviews for shipments of natural bristle paintbrushes and brush heads from the PRC: (1) produced by ZLMBF and exported by Shanghai; (2) produced by ZLMBF and exported by Changshan.

It is the Department's usual practice in cases involving non-market economies to require that a company seeking to establish eligibility for an antidumping duty rate separate from the country-wide rate provide de jure and de facto evidence of an absence of government control over the company's export activities. Accordingly, we will issue a questionnaire to Shanghai and Changshan (including a complete separate rates section), allowing approximately 37 days for response. If the response from each respondent provides sufficient indication that it is not subject to either de jure or de facto government control with respect to its exports of natural bristle paintbrushes and brush heads, the review will proceed. If, on the other hand, a respondent does not demonstrate its eligibility for a separate rate, then it will be deemed to be affiliated with other companies that exported during the POI and not eligible for a separate rate, and the review of that respondent will be rescinded.

We will instruct the U.S. Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (BCBP) to allow, at the option of the importer, the posting, until the completion of the review, of a single entry bond or security in lieu of a cash deposit for subject merchandise exported by and produced by the above listed companies. See 19 CFR 351.214(e). Shanghai and Changshan certified that they exported but did not produce the subject merchandise on which they based their new shipper review requests (i.e. ZLMBF certified that it produced the subject merchandise exported by Shanghai and Changshan). Therefore, we will instruct BCBP to limit the bonding option only to entries of subject merchandise: (1) exported by Shanghai and produced by ZLMBF; or (2) exported by Changshan and produced by ZLMBF.

Interested parties may submit applications for disclosure of business proprietary information under administrative protective order in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and 351.306.

This initiation and notice are in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214.