Sponsored by:

Monday, September 29, 2008

Fixing the House (of Representatives) Crisis

Disappointed, but not surprised describes my reaction to the House failing to pass the economic bailout today.

Typing in foxnews.com today and seeing the enormous headline showcasing the failed vote, prompted me to look into the link. I scrolled down and read the article. Nancy Pelosi had to blame the Bush administration for the situation promptly before the vote and Republicans had to take that to heart.

On the side of the article, though, I saw something of more interest to me. There were polls displaying the previous Republican nomination, the previous Democratic nomination, the Bush approval rating and the current approval rating of Congress.

These slight additions to the article may not seem important, but to me they signaled an alarming problem with lawmakers.

The approval rating of President Bush is 30%, one of the lowest for any president in the history of the United States. Anyone like to take a guess at the approval rating for Congress?

It can't be any lower than our President could it? Unfortunately, it can. Americans approve of Congress at an eye-popping 17.8%.

After watching the precedings today, I can see why this number is so low. When lawmakers finally have a chance to actually step up and vote in legislation that can actually help their constituents, they fail to do it over petty pandering.

Immaturity aside, this shows how much they have strayed from the people who voted them into office. These people no longer represent the people; they represent everything wrong with America and I surely hope everyone voting this November takes notice.

With a 17.8% approval rating, something has got to change. If a Congress can not get together on a bill that the brightest economic people this country has to offer supports, then how can they get together on anything?

How does the new President think that he can fix our economic problems with this group of stubborn "representatives"? I firmly do not believe that the President has any power without a Congress that is willing to work with him. Change does not start with the President, it starts with Congress and with an approval rating much lower than a President with a historically low rating, Congress has a lot of changing to do.

My View on the Bailout

I am a representative of the "me" generation. Technology has transformed life in America to the point that we don't have to "wait" on anything anymore. If we want to know something, we get online and look it up. If we want to buy something, we get online, punch in a credit card number, and buy it. Within days, the product is magically shipped and promptly arrives at our house. With advancements in cell phones, the internet, and all forms of transportation, communication and information moves fast- virtually the speed of light! The lethal combination internet and unlimited cellphone reception has placed the world at our fingertips. This is my perspective of the economic crisis, the "bail-out." America is so technologically advanced that we, as a society, do not want to wait on anything. In all other areas of our lives-- cars, computers, cell phones, printers, the tangibles that keep our life in motion-- we have grown affixed to an immediate solution. If it's broken, we troubleshoot the problem and expect and immediate fix. If it can't be fixed, we throw it out and buy a new one. I think our society needs to relearn patience. The best things in life are worth working for, and worth waiting for. I think our society needs to bear the economic recession. Perhaps, after all, there is real value in hard work- the labor and strife our country was founded upon. Recent natural disasters have taught us to not take everything in life for granted. We have our homes, our health, our life! The windstorm of September 2008 has proven that we can come together as a city, as neighbors, and patiently wait for the help and assistance of others. Although we have all grown accustomed to electricity, we do not necessarily need the luxuries of electric power and technological entertainment to survive. I am no expert on economics, recession, and reform, but I do know that America is strong. I expect our economy to survive this recession. I am inspired by the strong community-societal interest in the elections of November 2008 and I expect ALL the elected leaders to maintain and support the strength, integrity, and overall economic stability of our nation!

UofL's Theatre Arts Program Performance,"The Story"

Childhood stories were easy to understand and digest with midnight sweets and milk, however, once adulthood hit, the fairy-tale, hunky-dory, happy ending tales took a turn for the worst. The fictitious stories of Utopia dwindled, leaving only the harsh, unrelenting and flat-out destructive social realities for digestion. Though, it’s hard for many to swallow, as it possibly results in less confidence in the societal issues and its outcomes, digestion of truth is necessary. Essentially, these reality truths are collectively representative of what many entitle and describe as stories.

“Stories unify people and their personal experiences,” said Frances Lewis, a junior Theatre Arts major. “The audience will have to write their own ending to the story, just like in life.”

The University of Louisville‘s, African American Theatre Program is aware of a stories importance so much, that they will be performing a play that deals with these social issues called, ironically, “The Story.” Though, it was written by Tracey Scott Wilson, it is under the directorship of Nefertiti Burton, Associate Professor and Director of International Programs for the College of Arts & Sciences,

The play is told from a modern day, journalist’s perspective on the controversial, blurring of reality and truth. It unfolds as an ambitious reporter investigates the brutal murder of a white man in a black neighborhood. This issue interconnects the social enmities of historical and present day, racism, competition and ethic issues.

According to Burton, the fast pace of the play with rapid-fire, overlapping scenes is “not anything like we have done before.”

“The play touches base with lots of sensitive issues that lots of people don’t actually wont to bring up,” said Meredith McBride, Senior Theatre Arts major and Assistant Stage Manager for the production. “It steps on that line (sensitivity) and really puts it out there.”

“The audience will have mixed reactions,” said Tristan Mapp, who plays the role of the Detective. “It will make people angry, make people believe, open peoples eyes and blow people away.”

Though, the social issues in the production will generate different perceptions among the audience, members of the cast also have to face these issues head-on, as they prepare for specific roles that are noted as particularly “controversial” and “ a little difficult.”

Cecil Washington, Jr., a first year Graduate student, who is studying Theatre Arts, agreed that playing the role of Neil Patterson, was just that. “He (Neil) is an educated African American reporter, who faces discrimination in the newsroom,” said Washington. “Personally, I’ve never experienced close racial discrimination, but Neal has to deal with it, however, I still don’t have to reach far for this role because I am an educated black man which makes the role a little easier.”

According to Mapp, “The role that I play is really not anything like me.” The detective is ten years her senior with a different viewpoint, however, her position is important because, “She adds to the piece of the puzzle.”

While many performers view the significance of role differences, others, focus on the significace of role similarities involving characters.

Winston Blake, a junior English major studying at Indian University Southwest (IUS), who plays the role of Jeff, a Caucasian male who is in an interracial relationship, encourages interracial relationships. However, he is aware that their will be mixed feelings and thoughts from the audience, he has high hops that reactions won’t be “too intense.”

“I don’t think that anyone would be offended,” said Blake. “I think that they (audience) will understand the tension because they could have been in a similar situation.”

Mapp also identified with her character, when she said, “There are parts in the story where I can identify with, especially with racial issues which is part of being African American.”

According to McBride, “Everyone can get something out of it; everyone can relate and appreciate what the point of the story is.”

As “The Story” spins off into action, characters such as Latisha, who is played by Lewis, becomes central to the fusion, as well as, chaos.

“I am the catalyst of the story who sparks other characters to start their stories,” said Lewis. “Though, I am not in many scenes, when I am in a scene, there is something different about me.”

Moreover, “The Story” is a complete picture of the many issues that are raised in today’s society, especially in regards to media and the likes of journalism.

“A lot of things are happening at once in the play,” said Burton. “The audience will wonder who is telling the truth; the reporter’s sensational scoop cracks the case…or does it?”

While many believe that the play will be easily wavered without further discussion, others’ believe that it will spark commentary and questions, as Burton said.

“I would definitely say that this play is unpredictable,” said Mapp.

Performances will be at the Thrust Theatre at 2314 S. Floys Street on Oct. 1-5 at 8 p.m. The matinee will be on Oct. 5 at 3p.m. Season tickets are $50 for the general public, $45 for UofL employees and people 65 and older and $35 for students. Individual show tickets are $12 for the general public or $8 for faculty, staff, students and senior citizens. For tickets and information, call the Box Office, 502-852-6814 or visit http://louisville.edu/a-s/ta/.

Check Your Assumptions

Two weekends ago I attended a retreat in Illionis during which I and my fellow college students were strongly encouraged to vote and become "politically active." The retreat was specifically oriented toward Christians; I attended as a resident of the Christian Campus Fellowship here in Vincennes.

That the retreat was Christian is a minor fact. People of other creeds and anti-creeds believe that citizens should vote or be politically involved

I mention that the retreat was Christian only to lament that my fellow followers of King Jesus continue to fail to face reality and continue to deceive themselves on political matters. Further, it troubles me that the most woefully ignorant are among the shepherds and teachers of the Church.

One of our speakers implied that failing to vote is a sin. He told us that not voting is a vote, that America is a country where the people rule and that failing to vote is failing to submit to the governing authorities. We were told we were compelled by Scripture (and the clever Aristotelian either/or scenarios of the speaker) to "participate."

Our speaker assumed that:

a) America is a nation under law in which the people may influence, reform or alter the government. Government is responsive to the people.

b) The two political parties represent significantly different points of view, that is, there are genuine choices.

c) The official spin on major issues and events we receive from the corporate news media, academia and various government agencies is basically the truth.

d) Officers elected by the people control the government and know what they are doing. We can trust them.

e) America is a free country rooted in Christian morality. The government may make mistakes, but it would never, as a matter of policy, commit heinous crimes against the American people or against foreign peoples.

Unfortunately, for those with even a minimal understanding of history, these assumptions are false. The common man has very little power to defend himself, feed himself, clothe himself, shelter himself or work for himself, let alone take care of his neighbors.

The United States is governed by forces unseen and seen. These forces often compete with each other, sometimes work together and usually get their way. We know by observation of events (such as the recent bailouts) that these forces exist, but it is difficult to determine their true scope or identity. That they exist and can cause great harm is, nonetheless, a fact of life.

Realistically, little can be accomplished by voting because voting is a passive act. The choices are predetermined and the act only happens once or twice a year. The Forces who comprise the True Government of the United States are not passive; they are active, and they can only be resisted with action.

So, yes, do take care to vote, but don't kid yourself. While you watch the two Barbarians debate one another, remember that the Large and Awful Faces who really run things will continue to rule no matter who wins. Remember also that you depend upon and do business with the said rulers, however awful or ugly they may be. Be careful.

To tell the truth

Why can't politicans tell the truth? Because they are so desperate for citizens' approval. One factor of the current economic crisis that few critics have touched on is Americans' reckless spending. Offering solutions to the crisis, many simply play the blame game, overlooking their own responsibility for what has happened. We as Americans have to realize that sacrifices must be made. The United States is fighting two wars right now and its citizens have not been asked to make any sacrifices, as has always happened in the past. We cannot have everything the way we want it without later repercussions. As far as what sacrifices need to be made, I am not the one to say.Although this may sound odd now, I know that we can recover from this economic crisis. To me, the more immediate problem is global warming. New technology will ease the transition, but sacrifices will be obligatory. People cannot keep driving their SUVs, not recycling, wasting water, etc. To feel the full effect of the problem, the public must give up something. This way, we will realize how big the problem really is. We cannot act as if nothing is happening, because it is, just maybe not to us right now.That is why I am asking the the politicians, especially president-elect Barack Obama, to tell the truth, no matter how painful. The only way we can fix problems is by first seeing how bad they really are.

A Sobering Thought

College and alcohol have been synonymous for years. Whether it's a wild party or a simple drink among friends, liquid courage is as much a part of college culture as textbooks and study halls. Still, there are many consequences to be endured when college students go too far and put themselves in danger due to irresponsible drinking. According to the Journal of Studies on Alcohol, one in five college students meets the criteria for alcohol abuse or dependence.A group of more than 100 college presidents from across the nation, however, has a radical approach to decreasing binge drinking: lowering the legal drinking age from 21 to 18.As a result, this controversial issue has begun to spread across many of the nation's college campuses, creating both a sense of urgency and opportunity in the lives of many college-age students."I think they should lower it because you [can] be in the war [at that age]," said Courtnee Huffman, a sophomore nursing major. "How do you expect people to risk their lives, but be banned from drinking alcohol?"Miguel Sanchez, a senior political science major, also agrees with the proposal to lower the legal drinking age. "If you're going to be an adult legally, you shouldn't be discriminated on your maturity level," said Sanchez. "It's like a probationary period to be an adult."The college presidents proposed lowering the legal drinking age nationwide from 21 to 18, banding together under the moniker the Amethyst Initiative. The group is concerned that continuing to forbid legal drinking from those underage would foster what many call the "binge-drinking culture." According to recent polls, nearly half of college students, regardless of age, confess to binge drinking. One in five male freshmen responded that they regularly drink more than 10 drinks at a time. Though many think that this culture is not a constant presence in the lives of college students, there are those who have had different experiences.Tyler Ashby, a senior history major found opposition with the issue: "When alcohol is made illegal, it only makes underage people more interested in hiding it and wanting to drink excessively."An analysis of federal records conducted by the Associated Press found that 157 college-age people drank themselves to death from 1999 through 2005. Researchers have also found that more than 40 percent of college students reported at least one symptom of alcohol abuse or dependence. "What's terrible is seeing the kids who can't drink at the bar passed out all over the place because they spend an hour before the party taking shots to the face," said Sanchez. Another study has estimated more than 500,000 full-time students at four-year colleges suffer injuries each year related to drinking. About 1,700 students die in such accidents.According to professor Deborah Keeling, who serves as the justice administration department chair, "The college presidents are trying to prevent this underground culture that is different in other countries."In Europe, where the legal age for drinking alcohol tends to be 18 or under, drunkenness occurs in only 1 of every 10 drinking occasions, according to the latest statistics. In the U.S., where alcohol is not cultural but is regulated under law and behavior is learned from peers, drunkenness ensues about half the time. According to research by the Centers for Disease Control, however, raising the drinking age effectively reduces drunk-driving deaths."Figuring out how to teach is the central issue to drinking responsibly and not engaging in binge-drinking," said Keeling.A concern for this has resulted in the same college presidents who are trying to lower the legal drinking age looking to raise awareness through programs and events on campuses to educate college students about taking precaution when consuming alcohol as responsible subjects. On the other hand, there are those who think that, in spite of education to prevent irresponsible drinking, lowering the legal drinking age would still be detrimental to young students. "This issue is neither cut nor dry," said Jerald Smith, a senior chemical engineering major. "Lowering [the drinking age] will only increase underage drinking because it will filter throughout society's stereotypes of underage drinking."Tara Bridwell, a freshman justice administration major, disagreed with the lowering of the legal drinking age. "It gives you more time to mature and understand responsibility when the bar for drinking alcohol is twenty-one," said Bridwell in defense of the status quo.Bridwell is certainly not alone in her assessment of the drinking age debate, as many organizations have come forward to condemn the notion of lowering the drinking age. Especially opposed to the proposal is Mothers Against Drunk Driving; in a recent press release, the group stated that lowering the legal drinking age to 18 years is "a misguided and dangerous thought.Still, though, some students are looking to compromise or consider laws that would rely on a number besides age: blood alcohol level."If there was a limit on the intake level of alcohol then I think that lowering the legal drinking age would be a good idea," said Zachary McKee, a senior political science major. McKee, however, realizes that no law will be perfect."However, I think that people could also take it for granted."

Technology in the Classroom: The College Experience

Professors are using more new and advanced technological programs in classrooms that have become more popular over the years on college campuses. Depending on one’s major, students are exposed to a number of technical programs that include, but are not limited to, PowerPoint to Dy Know and from Projection screens to Bloodshed. These programs are designed to enhance the students’ academic, classroom experience, thus aiding student engagement and overall, career development. Moreover, many students agree that technology in the classroom is academically beneficial for multiple reasons. According to Demetrius Pryor, a freshman, Undecided major, technology programs are necessary in larger classroom settings. “I am taking a History class, and it is so big, that they (professors) have everyone answer the questions at the same time with iClickers.” iClickers is a small electronic device that regulates demographically, larger classroom settings. It allows students to send immediate responses for attendance, quizzes and exams, during class. James Johnson, a junior, Psychology major also believes that, “iClickers is more fun than taking a quiz on pencil and paper.” Not only does the student-teacher ratio affect the usage of technological programs in the classroom, but “Technology keeps the school updated, especially in my field,” said Troy Whittaker, a freshman, Computer Engineering major. Dr. James Lewis, Assistant Professor of J.B. Speed School of Engineering, is one professor who is committed to keeping students up-to-date with the newest technological programs. One is the Dy Know program, which is an interactive Tablet that transfers information, such as spreadsheets and graphic software, from the professor to students. This program allows students to retain class discussion and book notes from the professor. “Overall, the presentations are much better than the chalkboard method,” said Lewis. “I am able to face the students while using the program, which makes the course more engaging for them.” Though, the benefits of technological programs can span from class proximity to updated, teaching strategies, there was one issue in which both, professors and students, focused on in regards to tackling the diverse learning styles of students. These learning styles include, auditory, visual, tactile, kinesthetic, global and analytic. Many professors take into account, these learning styles because it aids the students’ academic development. Johnson, a visual learner, is familiar with a number of technical programs in the classroom. “I learn better with visual presentations, rather than just hearing someone talk.” PowerPoint is one program that many students and professors were opinionated over. “PowerPoint is a tool used to keep students’ attention,” said Xan U, a Cultural Studies TA who is known for her vibrant, colorful and meaningful classroom presentations. “You have to give visual and audio information for a more vivid impression.” Though, many professors think that PowerPoint best facilitates students, there are those, such as Alexandria Clark, a freshman French major, who thinks otherwise of the program. “It puts me to sleep because they usually turn the lights off and read verbatim of the content,” said Clark who believes that professors should give examples of real life scenarios to engage students and to make the PowerPoint program more “powerful.” Furthermore, technology in the classroom can assume beneficial or repercussion status. According to Sanders, “It depends on how knowledgeable the professor is with the technology used.” This can be frustrating and downright distracting for both the student and professor if they don’t know what they are doing.” Johnson agrees that if the professor has difficulty accessing the technological programs in the classroom, than it (class) can be a “waste of class time.” Not only do technological programs assist students with classroom lectures, discussions and assignments, but it also familiarizes students with the programs. According to Angel Sanford, a Senior, Pan African Studies major, “I don’t know where I would be without technology.” Another student, Heather Campbell, a sophomore, Accounting major agreed with Sanford. “I am hands-on,“ said Campbell, who was recently introduced to the Blackboard program in her classroom. “I have learned how to access it an benefit from it.” Whether it‘s one technological program, or another, Whitaker said it best when he said, “If you’re not with technology, then you’re not with the way the world is going; “you don’t want to be backwards with your education.”

Thankful

As my family and I rode from the Highlands to the West end of town, I watched as trees fell right in front of my very eyes. I thought to myself, I just want to hurry up and get home. When we got home, we had to park the car in the backyard. I realized that the wind was so strong that it had blown in our basement door. For the first time in my life, I was afraid to enter my own home.We were without power for five days. It was even worse because it was unexpected. My cell phone had not been charged for at least two days, our house phones were all cordless which ran off electricity, most of our food had to be thrown out and to top it off- the fast food restaurants were either closed or crowded. During the blackout, I complained the whole time about not having electricity and how upset I was that I couldn't charge my phone. Now that I think about it, I was being very ungrateful and selfish because even though we were without electricity, there are many things that I was thankful for. (1). No one in my family was injured. (2). We still had running water. (3). I spent more time with my family during the blackout than I had spent with them in a long time. (4). We always had something to eat, and last but not least (5). I learned that no matter what I am going through-there is always someone who is worse off than I am.

College = Confidence Builder?

When I was still in high school I began to notice a difference in older friends that had gone away to college. When they returned it just seemed like something had changed, like their personality had been tweaked slightly. And for the most part these changes were usually for the better. I was puzzled by this phenomenon at first, but now at the start of my second year at WKU I think I’ve stumbled upon the answer.

Coming out of high school, college is an exciting but also frightening prospect. I was ready to be away from my parents and enjoy the freedom that came along with that, but I was also scared. The realization had struck me that I was about to be ripped from my comfort zone and thrown into something completely different. New friends would have to be made in an unfamiliar place all while adjusting to college life. I didn’t know if I was ready. But I decided to stay the course instead of taking the easy way out. College and a career that I could enjoy had always been my dream so I wasn’t about to back out.

The experience of leaving your comfort zone and readjusting is what had caused the change in my friends. I’ve experienced this first hand but didn’t realize it until recently. Returning to campus this year I’ve really noticed how much more confident I am now compared to the start of my freshmen year. All of this can be accounted to adjusting to college life and sharing new experiences with people from all over the nation and (to a lesser extent) the world. Where I used to suffer a bit of social anxiety when around large groups of strangers, now I feel comfortable walking around campus. I’ve also gotten used to talking to strangers which is something I used to avoid for the most part. Being in college has also made me think more about the future and has made me more ambitious as a result. Applying for this blog is not something I wouldn’t have considered doing a year or two ago. But now I can see that writing for the Hot Spot will be a good experience and give me a chance to get some work published.

I’m sure not everyone feels the same way I did coming into college. But for the high school seniors that are worried about leaving home I can say this: don’t be. It might be scary at first, but once you get there you’ll love it.

Karma for JCPS

The gods are looking out for all the students of Jefferson County Public Schools this week. Hurricane Ike dealt the school system a good dose of karma by letting the students have one more needed week of amazing, perfect weather to enjoy with friends. The Schools have been hacking away summer piece by piece, now letting us out in mid-May and making us go back August 12! Does no one in charge own a thermometer or ever by chance go outside during the last two weeks of August? Whenever anyone is asked how long summer should last (that is, anyone with sense), he or she will tell you it should go from Memorial Day to Labor Day. It is just the way things should be; the school board is violating a natural law for all deserving students, and this week they payed for their heinous crime. Some people scoff and say "Oh, you're just going to have to make it up," and to those people I want to say words that I shouldn't say, because those same people are the ones who let their leaders make these arbitrary changes in the calendar and do or say nothing about it. So Hurricane Ike: thank you for giving back to the students a small portion of the stolen days that we, as Louisvillians, have allowed to be stolen from us. We should all be ashamed for ever letting the calendar become what it is today.

Of Facebook and Cyber-Sexuality

As student participation in Facebook grows, so does my curiosity as to why many of my straight classmates find entertainment in listing their relationship status as "In a Relationship with..." or "Married to..." another straight person of the same sex.

For the unfamiliar, Facebook is a free social networking website -- a sort of 'Myspace.com' for the college crowd -- where users can interact with other people in a particular city or school. Each user can edit a personal profile with as much about themselves as they wish, including relationship status and a link to the profile of a spouse or lover.

It's mostly young white chicks getting hitched to their BFF or sorority sister, but I've definitely seen the occasional dude jumping the cyber broom with his homeboy.

Being gay isn't quite so entertaining for everyone, though.

A recent Courier-Journal article introduced a local gay couple that got kicked out of adoption certification classes because the agency decided it was better for a kid to grow up with no parents than with two gay ones.

It wasn't a funny when 8th grader Lawrence King was gunned down in computer class earlier this year because, as reported in Newsweek, the 14 year old alleged shooter was freaked out that King asked to be his Valentine.

I didn't laugh when I read the Washington Blade story of 18 year old Baltimorean Steven Parrish who was stabbed to death by fellow gang members after they found "gay messages" on his cell phone.

Many LGBT students must hide important parts of their identity from friends and classmates, sometimes leading to social and emotional isolation. Those of us who dare to be out have a range of experiences, some good and some bad. I count myself among the lucky ones.

A 2003 "Campus Climate" study by the National Gay and Lesbian Taskforce revealed that more than one-third of LGBT students experienced campus harassment within the previous year. Twenty percent feared for their physical safety and more than half admitted to concealing their sexual orientation to avoid intimidation.

U of L's LGBT students should take comfort in knowing that while more than forty percent of those surveyed said their university was not addressing LGBT issues, our campus has support services that include the Office of LGBT Services in 'The Intersection' (beside the Red Barn), the new Cultural Center and classes like Black Lesbian Lives and Queer Perspectives in Literature and Media.

Seriousness aside, I'm at least a little amused that my heterosexual (and heteronormative) sisters and brothers find ease and excitement in playing cyber gay for a day or two. Perhaps it's a sign of changing times in which straight people are finding --or creating-- less stigma around issues of sexuality. Maybe our generation cares more about how cute a person is than how queer they are.

More power to you.

For those of us who don't have the luxury of switching our sexuality with the click of a mouse and a drop-down menu, being gay isn't nearly as entertaining.

Addicted to "The Office"

I recently became hooked on the NBC series "The Office." I don't watch TV often, and when I do, I hardly venture beyond sporting events and "The Daily Show" with Jon Stewart. I caught clips of "The Office" on TV here and there in the past and found the show entertaining enough, but I wasn't impressed. However, many of my friends are "The Office" fanatics, and they convinced me that I should watch the show episode by episode from the beginning.

And I have to say, my friends were right. Since aquiring all four seasons of "The Office," I have been racing through episodes nonstop. The show is so addicting that I finished the first three seasons in one single week, that's 51 episodes - about 20-hour run time - spread over seven days.

"The Office" is an adaptation of the BBC series by the same name. Not only does it offer an original (to the American audience at least) style of humor, the captivating storyline and outstanding chemistry among the cast suck the viewers right in and never let go. The acting is amazing, and the humor flows naturally from each character.

There's Michael Scott, the awkward, often-offensive boss who nevertheless means well; Dwight Schrute, the nerdy, power-hungry but loyal sidekick to Michael; and Jim Halpert and Pam Beesly, the "always meant to be" couple who often seem to be the only sane people in the office. Among the other oddball characters in the show are Creed the creepy old man, the uptight, religious Angela and the rambunctious Andy.

The crashing of these peculiar personalities often lead to disastrous situations in the office, and at times the jokes can be offensive. At first, one may be thinking: Thank goodness I don't work with any of these people. But once every character's personality sets in, one can't help but feel that each of them can be appreciated, if not liked. Well, maybe not Angela. Perhaps her redeeming quality will arrive with the new season!

Expenses of Expanding the Franchise

Ever wonder why political campaigns turn into nonsense?

Why does it matter what church a candidate attends? What does a candidate's family have to do with economic and foreign policy? Why does a certain candidate have an action figure replicating him or her in stores?

The answer is simple: too many citizens can vote.

While expanding the franchise over the course of the last century and a half has been an excellent way for politicians to gain votes, it also has effectively made elections easier to win.

Take a look at some of the headlines recently:Obama blames Bush for financial crisisMcCain Says Obama Didn't Call Palin a PigMcCain Mentions First Wife in JacksonvilleMcCain Out to Protect Palin's ImageIt's the Sex, Not Bristol Palin's Pregnancy, That Upsets Conservatives

In this campaign, like all others, it is a popularity contest. Why? The assumption of the candidates is that Americans cannot and do not need to understand the issues.

I consider myself a citizen interested in current events and national news. I take particular interest in the events of this country. If you ask me a specific question about Obama’s economic policy, I most likely could not tell you the answer. Ask me a question about McCain’s policy on healthcare and I would not be able to answer it.

Take one more glance to the headlines. Which ones focus on issues relating to policies each candidate wishes to institute? One could say the first, but look again. This headline aims to link a current trouble within this country to the overwhelmingly unpopular President, the President that is of the opposite party to Mr. Obama.

The name of the game is word association and these candidates play it well. If Obama can relate current problems within society to Bush, then he will do it. If McCain can point out that Republican Vice Presidential nominee Sarah Palin’s family is being unfairly treated by the media, he will do it.

Elections are all about appealing to voters on everything besides the issues. It has become the norm and it is because the voting franchise includes everybody who has no business voting.Taking history into account, which always needs to be done, the very men who built this country from the ground up gave voting rights to only those who owned property. Why they did this is evident today. The Founding Fathers believed that if a citizen owned property, then they had enough ability to vote into office qualified leaders. Candidates, normal citizens at the time, ran for office representing those who voted for them. Now, candidates make careers of being politicians and only aim to be elected by making appeals to their constituents.

Since their job is strictly political, they know exactly what they are doing during elections. This includes knowing the franchise. In knowing the franchise, they know what voters want to see. They do not want a representative who will get on stage and ramble off line after line of policy garbage. They want to know what their opponent’s church pastor thinks about gays and lesbians. They want to hear what they think about the opponent’s daughter being pregnant. They want to talk about pigs with lipstick and scandals involving his or her in-laws. By setting the minimum voting age at 18, lawmakers assume 18 year olds can make an informed, conscience decision on Election Day. There has to be a cut off somewhere, right?

The way the current campaign is going, I believe a 13 or 14 year old can make a decision based on the information dominating the headlines. A 13 year old has enough intelligence to see that Sarah Palin has a nice smile or that Barack Obama is cool. Critics may say that this isn’t the right way to decide the leader of our country, but isn’t this the vibe coming from the candidates?

Lost Money

Over 200,000 have been without power and that appears to be the least amount of dishevel to be faced in the coming days. It's a holiday in Japan, Old Folks Day (or Day of the Aged), and thankfully some markets are closed, but those that are open are reporting losses - on a global scale. One of the oldest brokerages filed for bankruptcy (also known as the fourth largest until last week) and another is being sold off to a rival. The government shunned Wall Street this go-around and will not bail anyone out - instead Lehman Brothers will file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and liquidation will likely follow. There is also a hurricane devastating the southern regions, a few wars are happening, Pakistan is shooting into the air, and the financial situation is bleak on all fronts. The explanation has nothing to do with deregulation and mortgages, rather the Large Hadron Collider appears as if it has worked too quickly and too well.

Alan Greenspan said yesterday that the country is in the midst of a "once-in-a century" financial debacle which will likely ignite a recession felt internationally. According to Greenspan, there is less than a fifty percent chance of sidestepping the recession. If you are unfamiliar with the situation, or its origin, listen to This American Life's episode entitled "The Giant Pool of Money." It's both a quick recap and some of the best reporting to be heard in years. Mortgages and the bulk investments in them are at the root of the problem. Those that were risky, given to those that weren’t the best candidates, the investors making options seem better than they were, and how over time the amount reneging on them looked to be exponential. What follows are bank closure records and monolithic investment firms, once invincible, submerging to cents on the dollar.

The heads of the former firms have no worries - they will be paid off nicely and go on to their cushy condos for some relaxation. What, rather, does this mean for everyone else? Banks, FDIC backed, can only insure so much money. 100,000 is normally the magic number, but after that point it’s uncertain. The dollar will decline, along with the rest of the global currency. The amount of travel will be cut down - and for that fear: oil prices actually fell a few dollars today (though a trip to the gas station wont mirror that). Possibly the most important future insurance one can enact now is monitoring 401k plans. Be careful where your investments are placed.

Spending in America is still supreme. We spend more than anyone on anything (an interesting graphic came out from the New York Times a week ago on the spending habits of countries in relation to each other in categories such as tobacco, alcohol, clothing, electronic, and entertainment - Americans spent more overall, but per capita references also appeared - American still extremely dominant in wanting to spend). While the power was out for most Louisvillians (90%+), Oxmoor Mall was crowded. People were crowded around new IPods and carrying multiple computing units out into the gusts of wind toppling trees onto their homes. The capitalist society was in full swing. Do these Americans not realize the economic situation? The better question: Will it get to the point where they must realize the situation?

Vampire Weekend Concert

To some people, the words "Vampire Weekend" may sound like an event or a special "weekend." But for a select group of devotees, those two words will conjure up memories of Tuesday, September 9 at Headliners' Music HallIt was in March when I first heard the band Vampire Weekend; they were the musical guest on Amy Adams' episode of Saturday Night Live. The first VW song I heard was "A-Punk," and instantly I was captivated. Their unique blend of alternative, reggae, african and other genres forms an irresitable form of music, which superficially appeals to the more "preppy" audience.Their subject matter is what truly makes them unique. Instead of singing about such banal contemporary topics of love, desire and crime, they sing about Cape Cod, vampires, college campus and punctuation.It was last Tuesday when this incredibly original band came to Louisville for the first time. To quote lead singer Ezra Koenig "Louisville and Vampire Weekend are compatible." The band was met with incredible response from a sold out hall. Arriving at 7:40 to an 8:00 concert, I myself was quite near the front, and after that crowd came in, I was stuck in my spot until the conclusion around 11. Because the band has only put out one album, the set list was brief with them playing all their CD's songs along with a B-Side and a brand new single. The crowd knew every word. Vampire Weekend's main demographic seems to be mainly young college students, and it seemed that every single one of them cramed into that hall had listend to their self-titled CD over and over again. I for one have.The concert was excellent. Vampire Weekend proved to be just as good, if not better, live as on their recordings. The overall energy was phenomonal with the crowd belting signature lines and lyrics. At the end of the night, I ended up buying a Vampire Weekend t-shirt, and when I showed up to school wearing it on Friday, my young college counselor asserted that he too was there and persuaded to buy a t-shirt. It is clear that this band's fantastic music touched a part of everyone lucky enough to be at Headliners' on the now historic day of Spetember 9, 2008.

"Life or something like it"

I have been thinking lately about what is important in my life. At this time a few years ago, I may have said music. At this time last year, I probably would have said school. Just a few months ago, I may have said running. Now? Well, that's a good question. Sometimes I just want to shrug my shoulders and try not to think about the fact that what really feels important now - What I am doing this weekend? Should I buy an iPod? Which teachers do I want to fill out college recommendations? - doesn't really matter at all.Other times, I feel more motivated. What's important to me? Life is important to me! But now, unlike at previous times, life means something completely different. Life is spending entirely too long on Sunday perfecting my newest t-shirt design when there is homework to be done; life is waking up an hour early on Tuesday morning to run when I should probably be catching up on sleep; life is playing tag with Araceli at La Casita and forgetting about my possible "B" in calculus; life is realizing that a "B" in calculus is just fine . . .I guess what I'm trying to say is that I have no clue what's really, truly important to me in my life right now. But I do know that the answer is something much bigger than the weekend or iPods or grades or college. And for right now, that's all the answer I need.

Moments of silence should last more than 15 seconds

Wait, today's September 11th?Is it really today?So, hold up, why are the girls in the back of the class talking? Why does my study hall teacher actually have to shush them?Everyone remembers where they were September 11, 2001. Me? I was getting picked up early from my fifth grade class. My mother had scheduled a consult from my new orthodontist and I was dreading the gum poking and prodding that would inevitably lead to a braces-verdict. I knew all about braces and retainers from friends and I would try my very hardest to avoid the same fate.But when my mother pulled me into the privacy of our car she began crying. It was then that I heard about the World Trade Centers.I still went to my orthodontist appointment. I still sat in the stagnant waiting room that I only associate with that day. While we were playing house, attending appointments, sitting still, a horrific event was occurring in our very own country. The radio played in the background of the check-out. No one moved or spoke. We just listened.How is it that 7 years later, high schoolers can conveniently forget those tragedies during a moment of silence? A moment that only lasted 15 seconds?15 seconds is the time my school allotted to honoring the victims of 9/11. In years past, we have spent a full 60 seconds in silence. What makes this year different? Have we forgotten the terrors of that day? Have we forgotten the estimated 2,819 who died that day: the World Trade Center employees, the police officers, the firemen? Have we forgotten the 1,717 families who found no remains of their loved ones? Have we forgotten the 19,858 body parts found, the 3,051 children who lost a parent, and the men and women, mostly aged 35 to 39, who were killed that day? Can we only afford to spend 15 seconds of silence on them?How long will the moment of silence be next year? 10 seconds? 5?As the date pushes further back in history, does that make the memory of it any less important?Why did we not discuss this in any of my classes? Why did we, as a school, not discuss the day with our teachers and peers? Our honoring of those affected by the crashes only lasted 15 seconds, until our principal moved on to the morning announcements. We should continue our respects past those 15 seconds and into the rest of our day. I am ashamed to say that I did not. By second period I had forgotten the date. By third I only recognized this as a Thursday. Fourth period I simply dreamed about the weekend.We cannot let this tragic incident be forgotten by the students who are encouraged to spend 15 seconds of their school day honoring the dead and their families. The moment that we forget, we disrespect our fellow Americans and our history.

My Rain Cloud

There is something weighing on me, a hazy floating object that threatens to leak its frightening contents at a moment's notice. That force is the pressure to be an over-achiever in high school. It's funny considering how everyone says you can do anything you want as long as you have balance. "Time management"..."resist procrastination". Yeah, and we are all yogis with the power to achieve nirvana while holding an upward dog pose. What is balance in today's world? Now it is seen as average to be an over-achiever. Anything less and you are considered lazy or a slacker. I go to a school where it is not uncommon for a girl to be involved in seemingly every activity offered, along with a full IB (aka: International Baccalaureate/hyper-advanced) class schedule. I must say I stare in wonder and confussion, not to mention envy, at these people, contemplating how they find the time or the energy to do all these tasks. What I have come to think is that it is great to be involved in things that truly matter to you, but I believe that to be involved in something just for the sake of adding another bullet point to a list of activities is not wise, or truthful. It is better to put your heart and passion into a few activities that truly mean something to you, that help define your character. On a personal note, I feel overwhelmed with everything going on in my own life. School, cross country, and college applications seem to loom over my head wherever I go, like my own little rain cloud waiting to commence a torrential downpour at any minute. Maybe with a little self-assurance I will be able to get a decent forecast.

Wanna See a Magic Trick?

Upon arriving once again at a place called school, students wish they could make their classes just disappear. Everything: binders, folders, books and even…pencils disappear. Well there’s one guy who can make that last object of lamentation vanish. For those of you who got my corny yet ingenious introduction, you know what I’m talking about. Heath Ledger’s ineffable performance as the Joker in the summer blockbuster The Dark Knight was one of the few cinematic things that will be remembered from an otherwise lackluster summer at the movies. For those of you who have not seen this film, are there any? really?, Heath Ledger stars as the leading antagonist in the newest film to follow covering the trials of Batman. The Dark Knight, running a grueling two and a half hours, had many noteworthy aspects, but Ledger’s superb performance was the stuff of genius. The Australian actor somehow magically altered his voice from a rugged Aussie baritone to a maniacal, high-pitched warble. In fact, Ledger is quoted in saying that the hardest part about finding the Joker within himself was coming up with the right voice. Well he certainly found the right one. That lunatic shriek will haunt many young Batman fans for years to come. The Joker’s appearance is also certain to make an appearance in the youngsters’ nightmares. Painted white skin, shocking green hair, dark black eyes, and most frightening of all, a permanent, carved, red smile were all part of a recipe of ghoulish appearance. The story of how the Joker got this perpetual grin is just as scary as the character himself. Yes, the physicality of the Joker was frightening, but it wouldn’t have been half as disturbing without the actor under all that makeup. Heath Ledger, ladies and gentlemen: a magnificent actor who tragically passed away in January of this year. His captivating and mesmerizing performance of the Joker will not soon be forgotten. The glint in Ledger/The Joker’s eyes at the sight of death and destruction is what was truly terrifying about this character. His cackling laugh when one of his diabolical plans is carried out. His apparent innocence with the declaration “I just want my phone call.” His constant calm demeanor in the most bizarre of situations. As you can see, reporting on this astonishing performance has possessed me to write three fragments in a row. But can you blame me? Such a phenomenal piece of art as Heath Ledger’s portrayal of the Joker deserves grammatically incorrect statements; it’s just that good. Some may say his performance was pure entertainment with no depth, therefore not deserving of a posthumous Oscar. Well he certainly deserves a nomination. The fact that he died without being able to see the astounding reaction to his performance is truly a tragedy. However, that raises the morbid question: Was his death partially the reason countless moviegoers flocked to the cinema time and time again to see the same film? And by the same token, is his premature death the reason so many believe he is Oscar-deserving? Maybe. It’s true that death is a spectacle, and seeing an actor whom we know is dead on screen is eerie yet marveling in a sense. We may never know the reason for The Dark Knight and Ledger’s mammoth success, but at least if nothing else, we learned a unique way to make a pencil disappear. Thanks, Heath.

Not-so-senior senior

A month into school and I already know it: I am a failed senior.

In fact, I lack even the most typical characteristics of an upperclassman.

1. I am… vertically challenged. Most juniors and sophomores surpass me in height, as does the occasional giant-like freshman. Students do not take notice of me in the hall—I am beneath their field of vision—and I must ask them in my squeaky, short woman voice if I can pass. Certainly this is not the way a senior should be treated! According to the generations before me, freshmen should part as they meet my path in the hallway. They should gawk and awe at my experience, my wholesome maturity, and my sheer brilliance!

But, alas, I am left to fend for myself in the thicket of hall traffic day after day, waiting patiently for a green light in the most obnoxious stop and go traffic. Between classes, the only thing that separates me from the small freshman is my well-developed mental map. A mental map I thought was suited for the average senior. It isn’t.

The first day of senior year thoroughly deflated my ego. Fourth block, the last class of the day, was creeping upon us; I hurriedly memorized the room number of my Human Geography class, simply so I would look perhaps a little senior to those who relied on their schedule in public. I felt like quite the idiot when I was lost in the school I had been attending for four years. Turns out it’s easy to mistake a 2 for a 3, which I don’t think I will do again. After I had asked an old English teacher where Human Geography was located—she thankfully spared me the sympathetic eyes teachers usually give clueless freshmen—I felt helplessly lost.

As a senior at duPont Manual, I couldn’t even navigate my way through my school.

Apparently there is a class that you can only access via the auditorium. How didn’t I know that?

But, I digress.

2. I cannot drive.

3. I cannot vote.

4. I cannot sign myself out of the office if I become ill.

5. If a freshman asks me a question, I do not snub them or act any way superior. Instead, I fumble through the available words in my brain until I find some that form a coherent sentence.

What kind of freshman could possibly be intimidated by me?

I look too much like them—my backpack mirrors those of freshman who have yet to discover their lockers. I do not know my way around the building (see#1). I have utterly lost my senior confidence and waver at the slightest encounter with someone I don’t know. Not to mention, I’m stressed like a freshman: my agenda keeps me from feeling an inkling of senioritis!

Maybe this is why I feel the need to trash-talk the 2012 class behind their backs: because I see too much of myself in them. Maybe I’m so embarrassed by my underclassmen-like ways that I can fake my way into believing I’m better than them. In the end, I’m not. They’re an intelligent, curious and respectable bunch. I have no right to expect anything from them—no right to hope they fear me, that they look up to me, or want to be me. And, though my proud, inner senior disagrees, I believe the class of ‘09 and ’12 should have a healthy relationship. Even a silly little freshman deserves some respect.

Sarah Palin, Politico Vixen

Initially: awe. Simply a nudge by a stranger informing me McCain picked a female governor from Alaska with experience in politics that wasn't nearly as impressive as Abramson. The proper response: Huh? Why?

The epic of a girl from Alaska has grown. It's grown into the most popular topic of political blogosphere and takes full utility of front-page headlines. The tale begins with her husband - a sailor, a professional snowmobile racer with national wins, and an oil worker. He is not an heiress to Heinz ketchup, but rather the subject for a young adult adventure novel. They marry at 24, a former Miss Congeniality and the man who tames snow. Their spawn forms a politically pleasing picture with issues in every crevice: a son in the military, a pregnant unwed, a child with Down syndrome, and an adorable younger girl with no known issues with life. Bristol adds the certain amount of faux-renegade spirit needed to mask the situation and add conflict to the plot. With the suggested “Babygate” ordeal (a ridiculous and illogical assertion that Trig is also Bristol's child), the view of family unity through turmoil is highlighted. It is a perfect picture, with minute substance.

Palin is little new, except in years. The story takes a downturn, or maybe a surprise that behind the facade of hockey mom is a hard lined, straight conservative politician with the quark of being female and having a family life. She takes check marks down the gauntlet of Republican virtues. She is pro-life ("pro-life as any candidate can be" and is not in favor of abortion in the case of rape) and backs abstinence-only education. This is interesting, that she is against the women’s right to choose, yet she has said she is proud of the choice her daughter made. If Mrs. Palin had her way there would be no choice available to be proud over. She supported a referendum to amend Alaska’s constitution to deny health benefits to same-sex couples. She supports capital punishment. She does not believe global warming is a human cause. She is a member of the NRA.

She supports teaching creationism alongside evolution in public schools. She attempted (according to the former mayor of Wasilla) to ban books from the library. This, in addition to being against any form of real sex education course, should be a concern of intense logical analysis as the educational system becomes increasing involved in absurd political tumbles (Sex ed, No Child Left Behind, Creationism, College Tuition...).

Without dousing the issues further, she is nothing more than a straw man dressed in stylish chic clothing. There is no maverick move here. She has a story, and that is the epitome of her import. That back-story is the most important asset the McCain camp acquired. It may have been the best move he has made.

The media fills the pages, not with the post-convention Obama-Biden, or even McCain, but with the scandals and stories of an unknown. New facts are revealed daily before an eager crowd, yearning to know more. She is a soap opera - a small, self contained, operatic of sex, drugs, and adventure. The issues are near irrelevant. Bristol Palin’s escapades and whether Sarah eloped or not are hotter button issues during the last few days. Yet, the media attention is there. It exists on the McCain grounds more so than it has in recent recollection. They are getting the coveted airtime due to her.

How long will this last? It may vanish in a week. It may stay for the entirety. Yet change, harked upon in McCain's Friday night speech, is a ludicrous idea with this duo. The bipartisanship mentioned, ironic considering the preceding speeches of ultra-attack and little issue variant, seems to be another tactic. McCain, recorded at 90% votes in align with Bush, cannot tote corporeal change. Change, a vague abstract, is nothing without a concrete agenda of overhaul. This is lacking. Palin is the only representation of change, even though a placeholder, that the team has. She has breasts. Those breasts denote change. The whole package reeks of foolhardy whaler tales and desperate need for attention. The story though, it's surely entertaining.

Also, she plays flute and resembles Tina Fay and the president in Battlestar Galactica. She runs eight to ten hours a day. She can field dress a moose. I had to look up exactly what that entailed. It is akin to an autopsy, but messier and comes with the promise of steak. She was named America's Hottest Governor by Alaska Magazine and in the coming days I'm sure we'll find out more thrilling tales, but hear even less of what should matter.

The Importance of Reading

"The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie. One word of truth outweighs the world."--Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

Here in Vincennes, the old territorial capital of Indiana, state affairs are often on the brain. Here is what Article I, Section 19 of Indiana's constitution says:

"In all criminal cases whatever, the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the facts."

For more clarification as to the origin of the Section 19, see Section 1:

"WE DECLARE, That all people are created equal; that they are endowed by their CREATOR with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that all power is inherent in the people; and that all free governments are, and of right ought to be, founded on their authority, and instituted for their peace, safety, and well-being. For the advancement of these ends, the people have, at all times, an indefeasible right to alter and reform their government."

I fear that the United States, rather than being a republic under law, has become an empire under lawyers. Said lawyers, by sophistry, make a right a wrong. They justify torture, spying and murder. They make normal activities illegal and require the people to beg them for permission. They instill fear in the masses by destroying the fortunes and reputations of some through litigation.

Probably the lawyers' most damaging doctrine is that the law is for them alone to understand and for them alone to apply. This doctrine enriches them and leaves us at their mercy. We are governed no longer by law but by men. We live in a state of highly regulated and licensed anarchy.

This doctrine is plainly contrary to the spirit of the U.S. Constitution, the letter of the Indiana Constitution and against the better traditions of Western civilization.

We humans convey truth and meaning through language. Due to the advent of printing, writing has taken on greater importance, for better or worse, than speaking.

The Indiana Constitution assumes that if the citizens of Indiana can read, they can understand and apply the law. It affirms the idea that all men are created equal and endowed with inalienable rights given by the Creator. It goes on to say that if a jury can come to a case and make sense of the evidence, this jury may determine what the law is and what the facts are.

The lawyers may not supercede them.

Citizens should be able to decide what the law is because government is "inherent" in the people, not the lawyers. All "free governments" are "founded on their authority."

If you want to become a leader, rather than a follower, of men, read. There's too much out there to read, so you won't be able to get to it all. Just pick something. You will be able to educate yourself without filters and you will become the self-governing individual the Founding Fathers knew they needed to secure constitutional government. Strive to become the revolutionary in the reading chair.

Great changes in history have been started by simply taking the time to read the fine print. Think: the Reformation.

A Sobering Though

College and alcohol have been synonymous for years. Whether it's a wild party or a simple drink among friends, liquid courage is as much a part of college culture as textbooks and study halls. Still, there are many consequences to be endured when college students go too far and put themselves in danger due to irresponsible drinking. According to the Journal of Studies on Alcohol, one in five college students meets the criteria for alcohol abuse or dependence.A group of more than 100 college presidents from across the nation, however, has a radical approach to decreasing binge drinking: lowering the legal drinking age from 21 to 18.As a result, this controversial issue has begun to spread across many of the nation's college campuses, creating both a sense of urgency and opportunity in the lives of many college-age students."I think they should lower it because you [can] be in the war [at that age]," said Courtnee Huffman, a sophomore nursing major. "How do you expect people to risk their lives, but be banned from drinking alcohol?"Miguel Sanchez, a senior political science major, also agrees with the proposal to lower the legal drinking age. "If you're going to be an adult legally, you shouldn't be discriminated on your maturity level," said Sanchez. "It's like a probationary period to be an adult."The college presidents proposed lowering the legal drinking age nationwide from 21 to 18, banding together under the moniker the Amethyst Initiative. The group is concerned that continuing to forbid legal drinking from those underage would foster what many call the "binge-drinking culture." According to recent polls, nearly half of college students, regardless of age, confess to binge drinking. One in five male freshmen responded that they regularly drink more than 10 drinks at a time. Though many think that this culture is not a constant presence in the lives of college students, there are those who have had different experiences.Tyler Ashby, a senior history major found opposition with the issue: "When alcohol is made illegal, it only makes underage people more interested in hiding it and wanting to drink excessively."An analysis of federal records conducted by the Associated Press found that 157 college-age people drank themselves to death from 1999 through 2005. Researchers have also found that more than 40 percent of college students reported at least one symptom of alcohol abuse or dependence. "What's terrible is seeing the kids who can't drink at the bar passed out all over the place because they spend an hour before the party taking shots to the face," said Sanchez. Another study has estimated more than 500,000 full-time students at four-year colleges suffer injuries each year related to drinking. About 1,700 students die in such accidents.According to professor Deborah Keeling, who serves as the justice administration department chair, "The college presidents are trying to prevent this underground culture that is different in other countries."In Europe, where the legal age for drinking alcohol tends to be 18 or under, drunkenness occurs in only 1 of every 10 drinking occasions, according to the latest statistics. In the U.S., where alcohol is not cultural but is regulated under law and behavior is learned from peers, drunkenness ensues about half the time. According to research by the Centers for Disease Control, however, raising the drinking age effectively reduces drunk-driving deaths."Figuring out how to teach is the central issue to drinking responsibly and not engaging in binge-drinking," said Keeling.A concern for this has resulted in the same college presidents who are trying to lower the legal drinking age looking to raise awareness through programs and events on campuses to educate college students about taking precaution when consuming alcohol as responsible subjects. On the other hand, there are those who think that, in spite of education to prevent irresponsible drinking, lowering the legal drinking age would still be detrimental to young students. "This issue is neither cut nor dry," said Jerald Smith, a senior chemical engineering major. "Lowering [the drinking age] will only increase underage drinking because it will filter throughout society's stereotypes of underage drinking."Tara Bridwell, a freshman justice administration major, disagreed with the lowering of the legal drinking age. "It gives you more time to mature and understand responsibility when the bar for drinking alcohol is twenty-one," said Bridwell in defense of the status quo.Bridwell is certainly not alone in her assessment of the drinking age debate, as many organizations have come forward to condemn the notion of lowering the drinking age. Especially opposed to the proposal is Mothers Against Drunk Driving; in a recent press release, the group stated that lowering the legal drinking age to 18 years is "a misguided and dangerous thought.Still, though, some students are looking to compromise or consider laws that would rely on a number besides age: blood alcohol level."If there was a limit on the intake level of alcohol then I think that lowering the legal drinking age would be a good idea," said Zachary McKee, a senior political science major. McKee, however, realizes that no law will be perfect."However, I think that people could also take it for granted."

A Sobering Thought

Drinking age 18? Ridiculous, How About 16?

100 college presidents recently signed a petition to lower the drinking age to 18. I completely disagree with them. They need to promote a minimum drinking age of 16 rather than 18. Before I get jumped all over by MADD or any other group against drinking, let me build a case.

you are an American elitist, this may not please you patriotic citizens either: We need to look to Europe for guidance on this issue.

According to the International Center for Alcohol Policies, Austria, Netherlands, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain entail laws setting the minimum drinking age at 16 years old. By placing the minimum age at 16, these countries have allowed teenagers to grow up with alcohol as a major component of their early social lives. This ideal appeals to me because it allows the teenager to be supervised while experiencing their first run in with alcohol.

This type of restriction would work in this country. Instead of teenagers having their first taste of alcohol in a college setting with unlimited freedom and nobody to look after them, they can drink in a supervised environment. It would cut back on the underground dangers of binge drinking in high school and college.

Along with this lowering of the age, I propose a longer, more strenuous process to obtain a driver’s license. Tougher, stricter regulations on drunk drivers should be included in this policy. With these regulations intact, police can be less worried about breaking up parties that may or may not include underage drinking, and worry more about the drunken drivers that roam the streets every night.

According to a 2004 Washington Post article, a European increase in radar units on streets and sobriety checkpoints have cut traffic deaths by a fifth. If this is done in the United States, who knows how many lives could be saved.

In terms of drafting an effective policy to regulate drinking, European countries set the standard. The usual arguments of citizens being old enough to fight a war but not drink a beer, and old enough to vote but not drink have gone on too long. If the college presidents are serious about their proposal, they need to think outside the box and propose a minimum drinking policy of 16 years of age. By looking to other countries and their policies, America can actually learn from other countries instead of attempting to belittle them.

Dealing with Defeat

A major portion of the sporting world is beginning to heat up as the fall approaches. Major League Baseball's postseason is just weeks away, as is hockey season. Football for all levels is beginning and basketball tryouts and practices will commence soon. It is a great time to be both a fan and a player.

With the football, foliage and fun that comes with autumn, there is great stress. Questions arise from aspiring players and anxious fans. Will we beat our rival? Will I make the team?Will we win the title? These questions stay with us from last season's final buzzer to this season's opening kickoff. They linger in our minds as we prepare for the next season, whether it's in the weight room or the bar.

Naturally, athletes and fans think positive. The "yes I can" attitude normally leads to greatness, at least in Hollywood. Despite the best intentions, there is room for failure. Yes failure, the human's natural enemy. We consistently prepare for our goal, whether it's winning or making the team, but we never ready ourselves for failure. The loyal fan is stunned when his or her team loses. The athlete cannot fathom sitting out a season or playing at a lower level. The fan and athlete are blindsided when plans go awry.

Year after year, every athletic entity sees the devastation of a hard worker. Despite what a person does, be it cheering emphatically or scoring a goal, it is often not enough. Failure is sports' common denominator with the rest of the world. Everyone fails, but sports is the only facet of society in which failure is regularly reported.

Yet in a failure rich environment, so many tears are shed when the inevitable occurs. Childhood dreams and annual goals are swept away in a tidal wave of embarrassment and self loathing. So much is invested in a game or tryout and when the final horn sounds and the cut list is posted, so much is lost.

But why?

Failure defines sports. Yes, it is everyone's least favorite aspect, but there are certainly winners and losers. It's the athletic food chain. The winners beat the losers. The best players make the team.People have trouble accepting this fact. We're so focused on success that we fail to realize failure exists.Ask the Los Angeles Lakers, the New England Patriots or the Pittsburgh Penguins, the latest teams to fail on the national stage. Ask Roger Federer. Failure is real.

What can we do to remedy this major blow to our ego? Acknowledge failure. Know that despite what you may do, there is always a chance to fail. Persist with a cautious, positive attitude. Strive for the thrill of victory, but prepare for the agony of defeat. When you lose, lose much, but not all. Only you can allow all to be lost.

With that in mind, go forth and do your best. Muster every ounce of energy needed to win the game or make the cut. Show up seven hours before a game to cheer on your team. Run or skate as fast as you can. At the end of it all, failure aside, remember it is just a game.

High School Sports: A Gift or A Curse?

While meeting and greeting each person I came in contact with during my first week of college, I noticed a disturbing trend.

For example, the dialogue usually went a little like this after the initial exchanging of names:Me: "So where are you from?"Opposing person: " (enter your town), Kentucky. Where are you from?"Me: "Louisville"Opposing person: "What high school?"Me: "Saint X."Opposing person: "Did you play any sports?"Me: "Just my first two years."Opposing person: "Well, don't you have to play sports to go there?"

Slightly frustrated, I politely corrected my new friend and moved the conversation other places. This type of occurrence played out in front of my eyes four or five times in the past week. It made me think and provoked me to ask the question: Have high school sports grown too powerful?

As I pondered this question, I came across the article on the Courier-Journal website dealing with the death of a PRP football player. As of last week, this was breaking news to me. The first exposure I had to this story included a headline with the words police and investigation. Now, why would the police investigate a death of a high school football player that occurred on the playing field?

The answer seems to be simple, and a little strange: criminal conduct. I read further on and discovered, according to this article, that four witnesses saw PRP's football coach deny water to some players. Since 1995, 26 high school athletes, including PRP student Max Gilpin, have died from heat related illnesses.

Heat related illnesses present many issues on their own, but the issue that disturbs me most is the pressure to win put on high school athletes, coaches, and programs.

The book Friday Night Lights written in 1988 could be seen as a prophesy of what is playing out all over the country 20 years later. Head football coach being paid more than the principal, but then being pressured to win a state championship, kids pressured into performing up to their father's standards, team pressured to win a state championship for their hometown. I saw it all in high school. I watched kids live and die with each game on friday night.

Just last week, the phrase live and die busts into reality. A high school student, who plays football for whatever reason, gave his life while playing football. He passed away from a cause that could have been prevented with proper care. Maybe the coach is under pressure to win and could not allow his players to have a water break. I know for a fact that the Kentucky High School Athletic Association has procedures that address heat and hold the athletes safety in utmost concern. I also know that it is up to the coaches to respect and implement these guidelines.

The blame then falls back to the coaches, or is it the administrators. I am saddened that the image my high school has in the eyes of a few is that of a sports school. I can confidently say that in most high schools athletes are in the minority, and that is the way it should be. A school's fundamental principle should be to educate and protect their students, do what is best for the student. Doing what is best for the student includes not firing coaches in midseason (as I have seen locally in the past), not pressuring students into performing on the field, and putting their safety first in all situations, especially when heat is a factor.

High school sports are great ways for students to get involved and enhance their overall experience and well being. A line must be drawn when that experience turns into solely the adult's experience for their well being.