Royals not amused; sue magazine over pics

LONDON -- Paparazzi, French media and a British royal: The publication of topless photos of Prince William's wife, Kate, has reunited the same players whose clash ended with the untimely death of his mother, Princess Diana, in a Parisian car crash.

William, who has long harboured a grudge against the paparazzi who chased Diana in the days and hours leading up to her 1997 death, was clearly infuriated. The royal couple hit back with an immediate lawsuit against the popular French gossip magazine Closer, which is owned by former Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi's Mondadori publishing empire.

MATT ROURKE / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ARCHIVES

Kate Middleton.

THIBAULT CAMUS / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Photos of a topless Kate appear on the front cover of French gossip magazine Closer. The photos have outraged both the royal couple and Britons in general.

The blurry photos, called a "grotesque" abuse of privacy by royal officials, show Kate -- the Duchess of Cambridge -- wearing only a skimpy bikini bottom. They are the first to show Britain's likely future queen with her bosom exposed.

St. James's Palace officials sharply criticized the magazine moments after the photos hit French newsstands, comparing the intrusion on the young couple's privacy to the tragic paparazzi pursuit of Diana, which many believe was a contributing factor in her early death on Aug. 31, 1997.

The parallels between the past and the present were eerie. Diana was hounded by paparazzi who took telephoto shots of her vacationing on a yacht with her boyfriend, Dodi, and tailed them relentlessly in Paris.

Earlier this month, a photographer with a similar long lens captured Kate and William relaxing in the sun at a private estate in Provence, a vacation spot near the French Riviera.

Instead of challenging the authenticity of the blurry photos, palace officials said they appear genuine -- and should never have been taken, much less published.

"The incident is reminiscent of the worst excesses of the press and paparazzi during the life of Diana, Princess of Wales, and all the more upsetting to the Duke and Duchess for being so," a St. James's Palace official in London said in a statement.

The British media -- chastened by a deep scandal over phone hacking and other misdeeds -- all shied away from using the photos. That restraint came even though Rupert Murdoch's The Sun tabloid is famed for its daily Page 3 topless shots.

The photos, which were not available on English newsstands, appeared to unite many Britons behind their Royal Family.

"I think it's quite outrageous," said Alice Mason, 24, from London. "They were on holidays in a private place and some creepy journalist took pictures. It's not in the public interest to see this.

"They are always going to be in the public eye, but there is a line, and they (the media) crossed that line."

She said the royal couple has "every right to be outraged, especially with what happened to Diana."

Much of the anger seemed to stem from the fact the royal couple was at a private residence when they were photographed.

Prime Minister David Cameron chimed in to support the royal couple's right to privacy. William, second in line to the British throne after his father, Prince Charles, married Kate in 2011 and both have recently expressed an interest in having children.

Royal officials have stressed William and Kate should not be photographed when they are not in public.

Laurence Pieau, the editor of Closer, defended the decision to use the topless photos, telling The Associated Press the pictures were tasteful.

"For me, those pictures were not shocking. Just a beautiful couple, an in-love couple, in the south of France. Kate is the girl next door," she said. She also dismissed accusations the pictures invaded the couple's privacy.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments.
All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.