Hi Blood and Soil. The SS recruited widely amongst many different ethnic groups, as did the Wehrmacht. There was even an Indian Legion.
The Muslim troops recruited in the Balkans were known for the atrocities they committed against Christian villages. They weren't much good militarily: when they came up against serious opposition, they didn't put up much of a fight before they ran for it.
If memory serves me correctly, Himmler was shocked at their brutality, and ordered Handschar Division to be disbanded.

I'm not sure what you're saying here diablo. Are you claiming that the above nationalities weren't very good combatants in WW2, or that they committed atrocities?
The Finns were renowned as good soldiers, and Finland held off the USSR for a long time in the Winter War of 1939-1940.

No, people such as yourself who have been tossing sand in the gears of this movement for decades to accomodate all of your various conflicting and contradictory extraracial agendas
Your Anti-Med 1024 Immigration Act started all this crap enabled the Negroes and Non-White Hispanics to get a toehold in our major cities by reducing Southern and Eastern Euro immigration to a trickle, while allowing unlimited largely NW immigration from Latin America the Carribean,and of course encouraged waves of Southern Negroes to come to our cities to replace the diminished flow of Euro immigration
Until between 1820, when the great wave of Aryan immigration that buiult the US began and 1930 or so,our White population was increasing in both numbers and a relative sense. By the 1940 census, our proportion statred to slowly fall, for the first time in Americas hiistory. It was not until the 1965 Immigration Act that this slow drop became a tailspin, but the earlier act, in the false guise of racialist legislation,set the table for it the latter legislation.
We cannot afford to keep making these errors, we cannot use the same realtivist, unscientific that our enemies use, than turn around and expect people to take our criticisms of them in earnest.

diablo

I'm not from the US, diablo. In my own country (Britain), non-white immigration has been a disaster. As a racial-nationalist I oppose it. All the SF members here feel the same.

If you were here in Europe, you would realise why, for instance, Albanians have earned their reputation. If you are saying that Turkic immigration is preferable to black immigration, my reply is: We don't want either. It is a bogus argument however.

I'm rather surprised to see you, as an American, if not a white nationalist defending Moslems. They crashed aeroplanes into a building in your country and killed thousands of your citizens after all. Why defend a vile religion that encourages miscegenation and is intolerant of the West?

Your arguments to support Muds are deeply flawed. Your views are not only incompatible with White Nationalism, they are opposed to it. I see that promulgating your singular opinions on SF has led to the banning of some members. Is that your intention? I'm a little confused over your motives.

I'm not sure what you're saying here diablo. Are you claiming that the above nationalities weren't very good combatants in WW2, or that they committed atrocities?
The Finns were renowned as good soldiers, and Finland held off the USSR for a long time in the Winter War of 1939-1940.

I'm not from the US, diablo. In my own country (Britain), non-white immigration has been a disaster. As a racial-nationalist I oppose it. All the SF members here feel the same.

If you were here in Europe, you would realise why, for instance, Albanians have earned their reputation. If you are saying that Turkic immigration is preferable to black immigration, my reply is: We don't want either. It is a bogus argument however.

I'm rather surprised to see you, as an American, if not a white nationalist defending Moslems. They crashed aeroplanes into a building in your country and killed thousands of your citizens after all. Why defend a vile religion that encourages miscegenation and is intolerant of the West?

Your arguments to support Muds are deeply flawed. Your views are not only incompatible with White Nationalism, they are opposed to it. I see that promulgating your singular opinions on SF has led to the banning of some members. Is that your intention? I'm a little confused over your motives.

Your argument is predicated on the assumption that I agree with yoiu that any WN can without reference to objective standards can deem any group he does not like "Muds"
Okl lets assume that this is a valid thing.How can it possibly work when tdifferent WNs will call different people "Muds"? I am not going toignore the plain evidence of my eyes just to avoid upseting your cathartic experience
Human knowledge must proceed by SCIENTIFIC METHOD AND STANDARDS. You cannot call a dog a pig just because it bit you,or is snarling at you
You willn ot assist yourself in dealing with the real or imagined dangers posed by the dog by so doing
I am extremely diosturbed that 95% of the efforts by Euro WNs lately seem concentrated on a religious crusade, while the Negro beast, the Yellow peril,Mestizos,and heaven only knows what else are being ignored
A White woman mating with a Negro is eternal racial death, A White woman mating with an Albanian produces a Whiite child.Nothing else,in the long term matters, at least it does not for me.
Better a thousand WTCs than one White sister fall...And I traveled through the Rapid transit terminal under it for 7 years, I went to the site and smelled the stench of rotting flesh......still,sometimes, dead is better
The members have been banned because they trolled,attacked other White nationalities, engaged in personal flames,and violated board guidelines.They did it many many times and were warned but refused to stop.

The fact is that Muslim legal immigration to America comprises of mainly “educated” Muslims. For now they are not disturbing the mainstream as they are too few in numbers and possibly, after the 9/11 attacks have kept to a low profile.

Therefore I can understand your point of view that white Muslims should be included in your vision of Pan-Aryanism.

Unfortunately this view is naïve; you pave the way for a future invasion of lesser beings with customs totally alien to the (Ideal) American way of life.

Here in Europe we receive the “lesser” Muslim. The kind that actively participates in the destruction of the host population. In the Animal Kingdom they would be classified under “Parasitic species”, but Europeans just know them as a peace loving people.

Perhaps you already know that Islamic theology has no place for forgiveness. Islam is primarily law, legalism, punishment, death, and vengeance. The colour of a Muslims skin makes no difference.

As for all the other things you wrote; white pedophiles, prostitution, the yellow peril etc. We are under no illusions that our societies are sick from within, but isn’t that why we are here? Many battles have yet to be fought. Islam is but one of them.

It is not merely this.Please do not imagine that if we get the White Moslems here,we willmerely leave it at that. A very large number of Iran9ian Americans have fallen away from Islam entirely.The structure is rotting of its own accord, a subtle yet clever push would simply accelertae the process.....but subtle is the key
Will these people ever go into a mosque again????

Equating Islam and Christianity because they are both "foreign" religions with European followers is like calling an apple an orange because they're both fruit.

Islam is a vehicle for spreading Arab culture. People are arabized wherever it takes root. Compare historical accounts of the diversity of tribes and civilizations in North Africa and the Middle East to how those regions are today. Cultural (and to a certain extent, racial) levelling is part and parcel to Muslim expansion. Never forget that there is no such thing as a "true" translation of the Quran. Although some Muslims speak tongues other than Arabic, the only true language of Islam is Arabic. This linguistic chauvanism is indicitive of cultural attitudes that are inherent to the faith.

Christianity is an entirely different animal. Europe's gradual conversion to the faith of Paul wasn't always pretty, but it was done in a fashion considerably more gradual and respectful of indigenous ways than any mass switch to Islam ever has been. Although Christianity began as a Semitic faith, it became European rather quickly. The catholic tradition developed and adopted Aryan religious conventions like the Triple God, the three tiered organization of society, minor/family dieties (saints), etc. These concessions to native tradition made the transition from paganism to Christianity less socially transforming than the general model of Muslim conversion. I will grant that western Christianity used to favor Latin over any other language, but this has changed since the Reformation and Bibles in the vernacular are now considered "official." And anyway, this initial linguistic chauvanism was less damaging to European culture because of the catholic tradition's respect for the caste system (only members of the first function had to know Latin because they were the sacrificers) and because Latin is a tongue native to the continent. Note well that Islam has yet to undergo any sort of vernacular revolution.

Islam is an alien faith that makes aliens out of its "European" followers. It is hostile to any non-Arab culture and therefore has no place outside of the Arabian peninsula. It does not adopt the ways of its foreign converts. Christianity (especially Roman Catholicism and the Orthodox churches), on the other hand, was long ago hijacked by whites and turned into one of the more recent vehicles for keeping Aryan tradition alive in the West. Do not compare the two or insult the latter by claiming that it is just as non-European as Islam.

Your argument is predicated on the assumption that I agree with yoiu that any WN can without reference to objective standards can deem any group he does not like "Muds"
Okl lets assume that this is a valid thing.How can it possibly work when tdifferent WNs will call different people "Muds"? I am not going toignore the plain evidence of my eyes just to avoid upseting your cathartic experience
Human knowledge must proceed by SCIENTIFIC METHOD AND STANDARDS. You cannot call a dog a pig just because it bit you,or is snarling at you

diablo

Just out of curiousity exactly what do you consider not to be white with the exception of a negro beast, a Bjork, or a Mexican that has enough sense to tell you that he is not white?