Thursday, July 07, 2005

Does anyone really know what time it is?

Some time ago a crazy dream came to me.I dreamt I was walkin' into World War Three. - Bob Dylan

A few, brief thoughts about London.

I think, at this early stage, we should be cautious about all sweeping presumptions. We know false flag operations are not paranoid conjecture - that many have been conducted by governments against their own populations is no less true for its being hidden - but that doesn't mean every flag is false. Synthetic terror exists, in part, because there is such a thing as unsynthesied terror: violence without stage management, perpetrated by unco-opted forces unpenetrated by its enemy's Intelligence. Though naturally, that many more people today than four years ago would gladly give their lives to strike a blow against crusader nations is also by design, according to the neoconservatives' rule-by-spiralling-chaos theory.

In the confusion, early reports detailing warnings of the attacks are being scrubbed from wire services, while security agencies are going into safe mode. An original story remains posted on Arutz Sheva, which quotes Israeli Army Radio as saying "Scotland Yard had intelligence warnings of the attacks a short time before they occurred. The Israeli Embassy in London was notified in advance, resulting in Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel room rather than make his way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first explosion, a Liverpool Street train station, where he was to address and economic summit."

Earliest reports spoke of six bombs. There only four detonations. Much later, two unexploded devices were found. A question: what was the media's original source for there being six bombs?

"The Secret Organization of al Qaeda in Europe" has claimed responsibility, yet another "previously unknown" group. Though, since it has "al Qaeda" in its name, that will mean to most people, simply, that "al Qaeda" did it, as though it were a top-down outfit of villainy such as SMERSH or KAOS or the Legion of Doom. The forbidden knowledge that al Qaeda was subcontracted by Britain's MI6 and paid £100,000 in 1996 for an assassination attempt upon Muammar Qaddafi is unlikely to be heard now over Blair's tremulous turn at "They hate us for our freedoms."

Assassination researcher Lisa Pease, who knows how the spin cycle tends to eclipse the unvarnished truth of such events, writes:

As I watched the CNN coverage of the London bombings today, I heard multiple experts, including Octavia Nasser (also spelled Nasr), say the group claiming responsibility didn't use known signatures of Al Qaeda. They even quoted the Koran incorrectly! I wish I had taped what she said, as I knew this was likely truth. Sure enough, a few hours later, all anyone would say was that this was definitely an act of Al Qaeda. Sigh. Like so many other covert operations, the truth disappears quickly in the quicksand of the "official story."

What, if anything, should we make of the date? 07.07/2005 = 777. Such calculations have never been important to me. But as I've said, it doesn't matter what's important to me; what matters is, what's important to them. So incredulity be damned: numbers matter a great deal to certain interested parties who are initiates in Western hermetic orders, lodges and secret societies. To a Qabalist, 777 is "traditionally the number of the Flaming Sword or creative Lightning Flash...which, when overlain on the Tree of Life, touches every Sephirah in turn and certain Paths, with a total of 777." 777 is the title of Aleister Crowley's celebrated volume of Qabalistic teachings.

Some more fun with numbers was posted by "st4" on the Rigorous Intuition forum:

Here's some math. Please correct it if it's wrong:1394 days since 911483 days since the Madrid bombing1394 - 483 = 911

And since now we're paying attention to such things, we might as well note that Bush's speech last week, graced by the bizarre backdrop of grinning ghosts and nine-striped flags evoking the dimensions of the twin towers, was delivered nine days before the blasts.

Rudy Giuliani in London, recounting his experience near the site of the first bombing, should have been enough to make even The Amazing Randi do a double take. And that FoxNews host Brian Kilmeade could say, just hours after the blasts, that "I think that works to our advantage, in the Western world's advantage, for people to experience something like this together, just 500 miles from where the attacks have happened," begs someone to ask the question, Cui bono?

As Xymphora says, "Yesterday, George Bush faced 7 world leaders who were going to force him to admit the reality of climate change. Now, he won't have to."

Britain bloodied in the "War on Terror" means, to American eyes, she's now the circus bride in Freaks. It "works to our advantage...for people to experience something like this together." It might have seemed like a good idea at the time, Mr Blair, but that's how you make a chicken lady of yourself.

Coming home last night around 9 (US East Coast time), the main highway I was on was filled with state police cars patrolling. Yet when I passed something that has been considered a potential target, there were no visible signs of heightened security. Go figure.

Your recent interviewer, Jerky, over at www.dirtfiles.com isn't buying the official story either, and he makes quite a convincing case on why this was a somewhat suspicious time for an unknown terrorist group to be blowing people up. I loved his final paragraph:

"What the fuck was Guliani doing in London? How many times has he been there in, oh, say... the last ten years? What is the probability that the man considered the best face of Post-9/11 America would be in London for that city's first-ever Islamist terrorist attack? Are those numbers even crunchable? Help me out here, people."

My first reaction and gut feeling was that it was the Bush Crime Family and the Mossad. Remember the gleeful Mossad agents dancing when the towers came down? Then they were spirited out of the country. Also, some people at Odigo, in Israel, received a warning about 9/11 about 2 hours beforehand. Similar to Netanyahu receiving word to stay in his hotel room (no matter how much they now deny this).

What I want to know is what they found out. Obviously there was a way to trace the IP. Who did it lead to? Did it lead to the U.S. or to the Mossad? Why has there never been anything more said about this?

No doubt, there is something to the numbers. As well as the G-8 summit. But speaking of numbers, the first 'official' death count I saw this morning was 33. That has since been upped, but was there a message there? A signature? Or is it just chaos and deception? ??? Is it a co-incidence that Baghdad is on the 33rd degree north latitude?I don't know much about numerology, but I understand 33 is a very significant number to some people. Numerology is at play in the events surrounding 911, etc. By using magical numbers, the events are intended to be grand-scale magical workings in themselves.Jeff often makes the valid point that what matters is what 'they' believe. I think the oncoming darkness and confusion is so great that the most important thing for each of us will be to know what YOU believe in.

"Choose you this day whom you will serve, as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord."

Faith in the one true God is the light we need in the discernment and choice and between good and evil.

What struck me most strongly about the date is that it's Robert Heinlein's birthday -- he was born July 7, 1907. Would have been 98 today.

And I'm sure Heinlein was fully aware of its occult implications -- I mean, you couldn't be the author of a book called "Number of the Beast" and not be, right? But somehow I very much doubt that whoever set off the fireworks in London today meant it as any kind of tribute.

Bush poll numbers tanking. Support for the war in the toilet. Rove about to be indicted. 2 billion people watch Live 8, and 26 million sign the Live 8 list demanding poverty relief for Africa. Global warming conflict about to happen between Bush and the other G8 members...

...and the bomb was so powerful it shattered reinforced concrete in the London Underground.

No way this was M/E terrorists. More Operation Northwoods action by the same people who brought you 9/11.

See Duncan Black's post on the ethnic makeup of the affected neighborhoods. Disdainful of "conspiracy", Black is very careful not to draw any conclusions. But I've been reading his blog for a couple of years, and I can tell his antennae are up.

Can't figure out at all how this benefits any M.E. state or organization. Except in one way, which I will return to.

I only see two heads of state that benefit. I see seven heads of state looking ahead on stage, looking somber (except Smirkey McBlinky , of course), and one head of state looking directly at The Smirk: Chirac.

And,I thought this spoke volumnes, too: Did anyone else notice how Smirkmeister started BLINKING furiously when Blair described the evilness of those that kill innocent people????????????????????

The TaleTell Heart.

The ONLY way this benefits "The Secret organization of Al-Qaeda in Europe" is this: It keeps the idiot Bush in charge of the hated America, and he can only do more harm to his own people.

Anonymous One,spin pivot bombs are the best way to get people to look away from a direction they are looking into they shouldn't be.Yesterday the masters of illusion put on a great show for the whole world to see,"the dark actors" as Dr. Kelly would say,took us on a little trip.Watching the images on tv, most people had that same look as 911. I asked a lot of people that I work with what their feelings were. Most seemed to think we should go get these f---kers now before they get US. I think this country is ready for anything they tell them to do. They only know what MSM tells them and don't care to hear anything else. Joe-six pack doesn't have time to think about bombs and who really did it,there is a big NASCAR race on this weekend and QVC has a really good pressure washer and on and on and on,later.

The series of bombings, all aimed at ordinary civilians, which began with the events of September 11 2001, needs a certain re-clarification. I describe 9/11 as bombings, on the grounds that the aircraft were essentially diversions meant to cloak the explosives in the WTC towers and the explosive device which caused the damage at the Pentagon. I also include the bombs in Bali and Madrid in the series. While it is certain that government figures are in on these events, pretty obviously in the case of the USA, I think we can go too far in assuming that these figures are directing them. Indeed, some of these explosions can be plausibly interpreted as being very painful prompts to some governments to keep in line with policies generated by a power which is behind, and above, mere politicians or officials.

The events are designed to be useful to the government concerned, in relation to the overall plan. Thus, 9/11 allowed the Afghanistan invasion and, to a lesser extent, that of Iraq. Many now theorize that a second such event will be used to preface a further major development of the Plan, such as an attack on Iran. Similarly, the Bali attack was used to cement Australian support for the Iraq aggression and Aznar was clearly intended to pluck electoral victory from the Madrid bombs, but he bungled the job.

Yesterday's bombs in London, on this model, will make it easier for Blair to get various state-control measures passed, notably an ID database on which Chertoff has his eyes. However, the bombs could also be understood by the British State as warnings. The British Ministry of Defence recently released plans to scale down drastically British commitments in Iraq and Afghanistan. Blair's proposals to G8 seemed to contradict the US view of the world.

It is worth recalling certain bomb events in Britain in the 1990s, which were ascribed to the IRA. Basically, the IRA went on cease-fire unilaterally, in order to get the British Government to do the kind of deal which later became known as the "Good Friday Agreements". The British declined to play and kept on demanding even more concessions from the IRA, while themselves offering fewer. Elements of British security services were implicated in events calculated to make the IRA look bad, such as organising a prison break-out, in this same period. The later "Real IRA" bomb in Omagh can be understood as part of this secret campaign. The British were then forced to change their tune by what I am sure were the 3 biggest bombs ever in Britain. These were all far bigger and far more destructive than the IRA had ever managed before in N.Ireland, on their own turf, let alone in England. The bombs resembled 9/11 in severely damaging London's financial districts old and new, in Bishopsgate and Canary Wharf. I recall little effort to account for the IRA's sudden acquisition of such power. If they were really the IRA, why didn't they carry on and get unconditional surrender? I believe there was only 1 successful prosecution - and the judge had to suddenly eliminate the murder charge, while the jury were deliberating, because it wasn't going to stick. The IRA guy took the fall for conspiracy, having admitted driving a truck, which was allegedly parked near the blast scene. This guy only served about 18 months before release under the amnesty. This ultra-powerful bomb was that familiar thing, a home-made product using agricultural chemicals in a truck.

Is it fanciful to suggest that these bombs were early acts of the same gang responsible for 9/11? The purpose was to intimidate the British State into line with the secret project. The project moved into action on 9/11, but had years of preparation, after all. The Irish issue was a wedge between the US and UK. Consider, the proposition that all 'terror' groups have some state's backing suggests that the US backed the IRA. The IRA got its money and guns from the US and it appeared to be a pretty safe haven for its operatives. Coincidence? With bigger fish to fry, however, this project had to be shut down fast. John Major's days in power were clearly numbered, his attitude to the IRA deal was unhelpful and the acquiescent Blair was in the wings, ready to be the beneficiary of this windfall. This 'triumph' got him off to an exceedingly good start, domestically and internationally, as a man of peace. The decks were cleared and the US and UK were fully aligned and soon attacking Serbia.

Another such event, preparing the ground for the project which began in 2001, was arguably the sudden, "accidental" death of Princess Di, who was a global figure capable of bridging the Anglo-Saxon world, at least, and the Muslim peoples. She already had a record for anti-war sentiment, with her irritating campaign against land-mines. A comparison with Diana's convenient demise would be the assassination, on the eve of big things which he could have affected adversely, of John Lennon. Which brings us back to New York City, once more.

These attacks were done against public transport. In the face of the ever rising price of oil, we can see the noose tightening. I foresee politicians pulling funding for public transportation because "it's just not safe". Who does public transport benefit? Mostly the poor/less affluent. It’s hard from where I sit to see this as anything but the magicians’ diversion. Forget about Iraq, Afghanistan, global warming, debt relief, etc. - you could be blown up tomorrow! "Hedonism for everyone, you never know when someone's gonna blow you up." Spiraling chaos indeed! 7/7, 3/11, 9/11...there's definitely something to the numerology of this.

These attacks were done against public transport. In the face of the ever rising price of oil, we can see the noose tightening. I foresee politicians pulling funding for public transportation because "it's just not safe". Who does public transport benefit? Mostly the poor/less affluent. It’s hard from where I sit to see this as anything but the magicians’ diversion. Forget about Iraq, Afghanistan, global warming, debt relief, etc. - you could be blown up tomorrow! "Hedonism for everyone, you never know when someone's gonna blow you up." Spiraling chaos indeed! 7/7, 3/11, 9/11...there's definitely something to the numerology of this.

Jeff,Don't put too much weight on the number of bombs. That had concerned me too. Then I realised the bombs had gone off while the trains were travelling between stations. As a result people were evacuating from both stations - the station of departure and the next arriving station.So the mistakes were perfectly understandable.

I'm sure hardnosed protectors of Freedom at the SEC are already at work cross-referencing this list of short sellers with those who shorted prior to 9/11. And that (Israeli citizen) Chertoff, who is securing my homeland, is driving them hard on this analysis.

Hey, wait, what country was that Instant Messaging company located in? I can't remember...

--------------------------

Investigative Report: “Odd” Financial Activity Preceded UK Bombing

By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

8 July 2005; 5:30 AM ET: Just a few short hours before the first explosion ripped through London, there was a significant sell-off or “selling short” of the British Pound in the financial market. This activity took place absent of any economic news or other known market-driven factors that would sufficiently explain the sell off. This activity also occurred without the normal corresponding pricing action in the other major currency pairs. In summary, a large amount of GBP was sold to liquidate a “long position” and secure profits, or to take a “short position” to profit from an anticipated drop in the value of the British Pound. In either case, the market activity warrants further investigation.

Many thanks to an alert subscriber to the HQ INTEL-ALERT for his expert analysis which served as the basis for this report.

"One Jewish official suggested that the "conspiracy theory" about Israel's prior warning lasted all day, despite immediate official denials, because a dispute still rages about whether Israeli officials tipped off British intelligence before the Israeli Embassy was bombed in 1994."

"Others made a connection with the empty 9/11 rumor that Jews had received a warning to vacate the World Trade Center before the hijacked airplanes hit."

Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom speaks with the Israeli Ambassador in London about the bomb attacks in London from inside the Israeli Foreign Ministry Emergency Situation Room in Jerusalem.

The Prime Minister's Office instructed Israeli officials not to give interviews to the foreign media Thursday on the London bombings.

After 9/11, Israel made some effort on international TV to impress upon the world that global terror and terror against Israelis were a common cause.

On Thursday, Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom and Finance Minister Binyamin Netanhayu conveyed similar messages, but only to the Hebrew-language media.

In the international arena this time the message was the following: "It's not a story with anything to do with Israel. It's a story of international terrorism in Britain and therefore we should be quiet," according to a government source.

The source indicated that part of the reason for such circumspection stemmed from the high level of "speculation" concerning the attacks. He specifically referred to a report that came out soon after Thursday's bombings that Israel had received advance warning of the attacks, pointing to the "danger that this kind of report can bring to Israel."

The Foreign Ministry, and Israeli embassy officials at the highest levels, totally rejected the report.

What one source did note, however, was that Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu received a call from British police soon after the first explosion, but before the full extent of the attacks was known, because it had occurred by the site of a conference at which he was to speak and for which he was about to depart. After the call from the police to his security staff, Netanyahu stayed put.

One Jewish official suggested that the "conspiracy theory" about Israel's prior warning lasted all day, despite immediate official denials, because a dispute still rages about whether Israeli officials tipped off British intelligence before the Israeli Embassy was bombed in 1994.

Others made a connection with the empty 9/11 rumor that Jews had received a warning to vacate the World Trade Center before the hijacked airplanes hit.

The P2OG, a 100-member, so-called "counter-terrorist" organization with a $100-million-a-year budget, would ostensibly target "terrorist leaders," but according to P2OG documents procured by Arkin, would in fact carry out missions designed to "stimulate reactions" among "terrorist groups"--which, according to the Defense Secretary's logic, would subsequently expose them to "counter-attack" by the good guys.

In other words, the plan is to execute secret military operations (assassinations, sabotage, "deception") which would intentionally result in terrorist attacks on innocent people, including Americans--essentially, to "combat terrorism" by causing it!

This notion is currently being applied to the problem of the Iraqi "insurgency," it seems. According to a May 1, 2005 report by Peter Maass in the New York Times Magazine, two of the top US advisers to Iraqi paramilitary commandos fighting the insurgents are veterans of US counterinsurgency operations in Latin America.

Loaning credence to recent media speculation about the "Salvadorization" of Iraq, the report notes that one adviser currently in Iraq is James Steele, who led a team of 55 US Army Special Forces advisers in El Salvador in the 1980s. Maass writes that these advisors "trained front-line battalions that were accused of significant human rights abuses."

The current senior US adviser at the Iraqi Interior Ministry, which Maass writes "has operational control over the commandos," is former top US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) official Steve Casteel, who worked "alongside local forces" in the US-sponsored "Drug War" in Bolivia, Peru and Colombia, "where he was involved in the hunt for Pablo Escobar, the head of the Medellin cocaine cartel."

The US "drug war" in Latin America also serves as a cover for ongoing counterinsurgency, employing terrorist methods to achieve two aims: one, actually combating genuine insurgency; two, the ratcheting up of a "strategy of tension," heightened social violence designed to induce fear among the citizenry and the subsequent call for greater "security."

This was the essence, for example, of Operation Gladio, a decades-long covert campaign of provocateur-style terrorism and deceit. The ostensible purpose of Gladio, officially launched as a covert NATO program in 1952, was to establish a clandestine network of "stay-behind" teams which would organize armed resistance and sabotage in the event of a Soviet invasion of Western Europe. But the network actually took a far more proactive role. Directed by US/NATO intelligence services of the West against their own populations, Operation Gladio led to possibly hundreds of innocent people being killed or maimed in "terrorist" attacks which were then blamed on "leftist subversives" or other political opponents. The most notorious such attack was the 1980 bombing of the train station at Bologna, which left 85 dead. Initially blamed on left-wing radicals, the blast was revealed upon investigation to be the work of an ultra-right network linked to the Italy's Gladio team; four Italian neo-fascists were eventually convicted of the crime.

The purpose was again twofold: to demonize designated enemies (the "communists") and to frighten the public into supporting ever-increasing powers for the national security state. It appears the Pentagon has been implementing Gladio-style operations for quite some time--possibly including 9-11. A stretch? Maybe not.

Cryptogon.com had a nice scoop from an Italian paper that said the "al Qaeda" claim was almost certainly bogus...details here. Which, given that the web-posting was up within an hour of the blasts would mean it was certainly a prepared "frame", and not just some wannabe group trying to claim-jump.

So, they targeted public transport. This, perhaps naively, is insignificant to me. I live in the DC area. Driving in and around DC... well, it sucks. Traffic congestion occurs simultaneously in any direction, at any time of day.

Who does public transportation benefit? Well, the public. DC's Metro transits hundreds of thousands of people to and from work every day. Housing within walking distance of the Metro system incurs a substantial price increase.

I don't interpret the London tragedy as a F**k You! Buy more oil!. It's more about visibility, in my opinion.

I would not disregard the possible significance of the number of bombs reported -- 6, although only four were actually detonated; two were later found undetonated. The confusion in the press could certainly suggest foreknowledge by key top officials and media people to the plan of attack, and could explain the discrepancy in reports as well as the confusion of transit users.

I'm not one to get worked up over numerology (in spite of being one of Goro Adachi's fans). You can pretty much make any combination of numbers add up to any number you want if you do it in the right way. Eco's Luciferian character in Foucault's Pendulum talks about this.

If there are mathematical patterns, they are large-scale and unconscious, along the lines of those which Goro ferrets out. The small players -- black ops, fascist family lineages, and the like -- care only about power and its maintenance. I think there is more to be learned by focusing on the political events the precede and follow these bombings than by their small-scale numerological relationships.

Jeff - Interested in what you make of the dramatic time shift in the tunnel bombing story. Everything shifted within two days from being 26 minutes, to 50 SECONDS between when the bombs went off. This is interesting to me, but I haven't found anyone questioning it.

Bryan said..."Interested in what you make of the dramatic time shift in the tunnel bombing story."

And speaking of "shifts in stories", the print edition of the local newspaper this a.m. screamed, "Attackers Used Crude Bombs". Now, the online edition is saying, "Experts say Thursday's attacks had all the hallmarks of an al-Qaida strike, and sophisticated coordination is one of those...The use of timers 'is not rocket science, but it still shows a level of sophistication which is beyond just sending somebody with an (explosive) belt..."'

it makes more sense to me to set the bombs to explode at the same time, so that there is no time for word to spread.

indeed, the lack of simultaneity is one of the biggest problems for the official 9/11 theory.

another comment on london: why does it take so long to organize this kind of attack? why sixteen months between madrid and london? how hard is it to make backpack bombs and leave half a dozen of them on a subway system on a given morning?

if this were real anti-western terrorism, wouldn't you think they could hop around from city to city and hit subways (an ideal target) frequently? and keep hitting the u.s.?

The early reports definitely said there were six explosions all up. I was extremely surprised when the number was reduced to four, and then later it was stated that two unexploded bombs had been found.

What this means is that the news story was ready to go - and working on the basis of the assumption that all six bombs would go off. When it turned out that two of them didn't go off, the number had to be reduced.

The media was therefore very heavily involved in the attacks. They had the script right there on the tables ever before it was known that any bombs had even gone off. Why otherwise would they have spoken about six bombs when only four had gone off? Who would be so stupid as to believe that it's just coincidence that exactly two unexploded bombs were subsequently found?

The BBC has a whole load of (new?) information on this that I've not seen elsewhere - see http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/uk/05/london_blasts/what_happened/html/default.stm for animations, pictures, etc. also, BBC Online Radio has "7th July Bombings - Jon Gaunt - Jon Gaunt live on BBC LONDON 94.9 as London came under attack" - this is the full 3hr programme, starting at 9am, reports and loads of eyewitness phone-ins from across London - start at 9.17am - well worth a listen... http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/aod/genres/factual/aod.shtml?london/jongaunt_bombings

Whenever a feeling of aversion comes into the heart of a good soul,
it's not without significance.
Consider that intuitive wisdom to be a Divine attribute,
not a vain suspicion:
the light of the heart has apprehendedintuitively from the Universal Tablet. - Rumi