All religions, arts, and sciences are branches of the same tree. All these aspirations are directed toward ennobling man's life, lifting it from the sphere of mere physical existence and leading the individual towards freedom. -Albert Einstein-

If what you're saying is that we are all 'connected,' in a way, or that all things are connected, then you're right, but I'm not entirely sure what the point of bringing it up is. We're all connected to each other through a common origin (big bang) and as such we share an infinte number of connections over nearly fourteen billion years of shared history. The universe is in constant flux, and every action has a reaction which of course ripples through creation. I could create or destroy a black hole thirty billion years hence depending on whether I pass gas to the north or south next tuesday, and how I direct or redirect the flow of atoms in my life. \

Can you tell me where the relationship breaks down? All opinions welcomed.

The first set of relationships (existence rt physical world) is not connected to the rest of the sequence. That's where it breaks down, first. Unless that is what you are trying to prove through the cyclical pattern that follows it. Like a statement and then a proof.

In that case the breakdown is in the second relationship (energy rt substance). energy is not more related to substance is it to the lack of substance. In fact energy exists between what substances.

However, energy does relate to the universe, so you could combine relationships 2 (energy rt substance) and 3 (substance rt universe). It does not however prove existence to be related to the physical world.

Can you tell me where the relationship breaks down? All opinions welcomed.

Maybe it is my training as a mathematician coming through, but without a tighter definition of "relate" I would say the above was fairly meaningless. Without any definition at all, it would be trivially easy to keep coming up with an ad hoc definition which made A relate to B.