If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

My shinies are not for trade or cloning.
Shinies are not listed in order, for example the last shiny on the banner is not always the latest shiny I've obtained.
Banner 1 made by Light Venusaur, thanks ^_^

It means that your pokemon are from the same person who has hacks in his name, there ARE hacks that get uploaded to pokecheck.

Why would hacks get uploaded to pokecheck when you can't even duplicate in black and white. Besides duplicating, the only use for pokecheck is to check your secret ID, which can be done with action replay. BTW, what you said didn't really make sense, so I'm not sure what you meant.

Agreed.
The only way the Mew and Celebi are legit is if they have received a little training. Try saving and feeding them the base stat lowering(hondew, pomeg, tamato, etc) berries if you have them. Feed them as many as you can then repost their stats(just mew and celebi). If you can't feed them any berries of the six kinds of berries, they are not legit. Also, if you don't like wasting the berries, then you can reset the game after doing this.

the shaymin, mew, celebi and darkrai are events and have classic ribbons which means they can't be traded over gts so if you got them over gts they are hacks since the ribbons were removed. the raikou, entei and suicune are japanese crown beasts events so they look ok as long as they have the classic ribbon

Sweet . It's hard to get shiny legendaries on there. A lot of them are hacks. Thanks.

Just because they're legal doesn't mean they're not hacked. Furthermore, it's not very easy to check the key points for legality on this. Uploading them to Pokecheck would give you a much better idea of their legality.

Why would hacks get uploaded to pokecheck when you can't even duplicate in black and white. Besides duplicating, the only use for pokecheck is to check your secret ID, which can be done with action replay. BTW, what you said didn't really make sense, so I'm not sure what you meant.

Your statement doesn't make any sense AT ALL! People can be jerks! Cloning has NOTHING to do with whether or not something is hacked.

the only use for Pokecheck is to check your secret ID, which can be done with a***** r*****

That isn't true Pokecheck has other uses, including downloading pokemon set to public and checking IVs/EVs of your pokemon. (Google the rest or look at it yourself for futher details.) Besides that hacking device is known to be very inaccurate when getting your SID.

Originally Posted by Shine

Having the same ID might be just a major coincidence

Having the same ID/SID as a hacker is suspicious in itself, since having the EXACT same ID is almost only possible through IDRNG (or editting it, YUCK!) it's only a coincidence if they have the same OT (since many names are common like Rob or Matt).

Your statement doesn't make any sense AT ALL! People can be jerks! Cloning has NOTHING to do with whether or not something is hacked.

That isn't true Pokecheck has other uses, including downloading pokemon set to public and checking IVs/EVs of your pokemon. (Google the rest or look at it yourself for futher details.) Besides that hacking device is known to be very inaccurate when getting your SID.

Having the same ID/SID as a hacker is suspicious in itself, since having the EXACT same ID is almost only possible through IDRNG (or editting it, YUCK!) it's only a coincidence if they have the same OT (since many names are common like Rob or Matt).

Joke's on you. I bred the pokemon myself, and he isn't hacked. BTW, none of that stuff has anything to do with hacking. And you shouldn't accuse someone of hacking just for his appearance on pokecheck as pokecheck really does not have anything to do with hacking.

And you shouldn't accuse someone of hacking just for his appearance on pokecheck as pokecheck really does not have anything to do with hacking.

Why the hell shouldn't we? If we see a bunch of hacks with the same OT/TID as you, we're sure as hell going to be suspicious. And the whole point of Pokecheck is to check legality, so I'm not sure how that doesn't have anything to do with hacking. Seriously, get a clue before making random statements about things you clearly don't know much, if anything, about.

the shaymin, mew, celebi and darkrai are events and have classic ribbons which means they can't be traded over gts so if you got them over gts they are hacks since the ribbons were removed. the raikou, entei and suicune are japanese crown beasts events so they look ok as long as they have the classic ribbon

He said GTS Nego, though I don't know if event legendaries with Classic Ribbon can be traded over GTS Nego or not.

Originally Posted by Ai7iS

pokecheck really does not have anything to do with hacking.

like what Agonist said, the entire point of Pokecheck is to check legality, hence the name. The fact that it also can reveal SID, EVs, and other stuffs is just an added bonus.

Originally Posted by QuoteMaster

Having the same ID/SID as a hacker is suspicious in itself, since having the EXACT same ID is almost only possible through IDRNG (or editting it, YUCK!) it's only a coincidence if they have the same OT (since many names are common like Rob or Matt).

Doesn't change the fact that two people can have the same ID by pure luck.

But I agree that it's suspicious, since having the same ID by pure luck is something that is much rarer than finding a Shiny Spinda with Pokerus and perfect placement of spots.

Originally Posted by Rayce

If it was bred on Black and White 2 and Shiny, that would almost be an immediate hack because of the Black 2 and White 2 Breeding mechanics. ~

My shinies are not for trade or cloning.
Shinies are not listed in order, for example the last shiny on the banner is not always the latest shiny I've obtained.
Banner 1 made by Light Venusaur, thanks ^_^

98% of teens won't stand up for God.
Be one of the 2% that will, copy this in your signature.
If you believe in Jesus Christ put this in your profile and don't just ignore this, because in the Bible it says, ‘If you deny me, I will deny you in front of my Father in the gates of Heaven.’
If you believe Jesus Christ is your savior put this in your sig

Why the hell shouldn't we? If we see a bunch of hacks with the same OT/TID as you, we're sure as hell going to be suspicious. And the whole point of Pokecheck is to check legality, so I'm not sure how that doesn't have anything to do with hacking. Seriously, get a clue before making random statements about things you clearly don't know much, if anything, about.

You say these people are hackers, yet you have no proof. Maybe you should get a clue. Pokecheck is by no means a hackers friend, nor is it something that proves that a trainer, or pokemon is hacked. In fact, it can be confirmation that the pokemon is not hacked.

You say these people are hackers, yet you have no proof. Maybe you should get a clue. Pokecheck is by no means a hackers friend, nor is it something that proves that a trainer, or pokemon is hacked. In fact, it can be confirmation that the pokemon is not hacked.

Edit: BTW, there are no hacks linked with my OT/TID.

No, you need to get a clue. I know far more about hidden mechanics than you do (and I know that for a fact), so I've got a much better idea if things are hacked then you do, even if they pass the legality analysis. Furthermore, just because it passes the legality analysis doesn't mean a damn thing. Many hacks do pass the legality analysis. Finally, just because you don't think I have proof doesn't mean I don't.

Wait a minute, wait a minute here. You post asking if a pokemon is hacked, a few others notice hacked pokemon sharing the same OT/ID number on pokecheck and say there is a high chance your pokemon is hacked too, you get defensive and start defending the pokemon you asked us about, and now you say it is your pokemon and you bred it yourself and you are not a hacker.

Did I miss something here?

Well, let's start from the beginning:

Originally Posted by Ai7iS

You say these people are hackers, yet you have no proof. Maybe you should get a clue. Pokecheck is by no means a hackers friend, nor is it something that proves that a trainer, or pokemon is hacked. In fact, it can be confirmation that the pokemon is not hacked.

The proof is that they have hacks on pokecheck. That's like you saying someone has no proof that someone is a child molester, even though they are registered as one and the police informed you they were moving into the neighborhood. They have hacks, there is your proof they are a hacker. If having hacks doesn't prove someone is a hacker, then what, in your opinion, does?

Also, if you can confirm that the pokemon is not hacked, why the hell are you even asking us if it is?

Originally Posted by Ai7iS

Joke's on you. I bred the pokemon myself, and he isn't hacked.

Again, if you bred it yourself, why are you asking us if it is hacked?

And you shouldn't accuse someone of hacking just for his appearance on pokecheck as pokecheck really does not have anything to do with hacking.

Yet again, I feel like I missed something as you are being really defensive about hacking when no one even called you a hacker.

So, to recap, you ask about a pokemon you now say you bred, that you now admit has your OT/ID, and you defend yourself against hacking accusations that no one has levied. Did I mis something here or not? Because if not, I have such a raging clue right now

EDIT: and what the hell is up with you calling yourself an admin and using an icon reserved for Sppf staff in your sig? Pretty sure that's in violation of something or other, but whatever.

Last edited by bobandbill; 20th January 2013 at 5:18 AM.
Reason: no need for image macros

If you want people's opinions on if a Pokemon is a hack then please don't get angry when it is offered then. Especially when it is explained why they feel such-and-such may be a hack as well. You're free to ignore advice but you don't need to start an argument or whatnot here out of it.

Last edited by bobandbill; 20th January 2013 at 5:25 AM.

A parody of the Pokemon Colosseum game, full of pastries and Miror B.
Completed. Four times winner of Best Comedy/Funniest Fic.