The race issue has long outlived its usefulness in righting a wrong. Now it has beocme a political ploy, an excuse to empower and fund those who have made a career of keeping “racism” alive, and a means to expand a dependent underclass of voters.

One of my favorite sports is 2 X 2 beach volleyball. The only problem is, in beach volleyball you only get to hold the court if you and your partner win. Since it is not unusual for there to be pro players on the courts, they can monopolize the play, meaning I get a lot of sit time.

The current fiscal crisis is not the result of the national debt, the collapsing housing market, wall street, the wealthy, tax cuts, the war on terror, illegal immigrants, insufficient unemployment benefits, the Fed, too low of a minimum wage, China, Europe, outsourcing, or natural disasters.

The current financial problems are not new. They are the breaking flames from what has been smoldering ever since politicians decided to veer from the spirit of the Constitution. Their modus operandi has been: If it moves, tax it. If it moves too fast, regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it. They figure it is their job to take (tax) from those who are ambitious, and give (entitlements) to those who aren’t. Although this is euphemistically called “social justice,” it is, plain and simple, theft.

The Nobel Peace Prize decision was made just a few days after Mr. Obama had been in office. Clearly the committee was thinking about something other than actual results. In his acceptance speech, President Obama graciously conceded that the prize was less about his accomplishments and more about hope.

In an ideal world, everyone should be able to move about without regard to borders. But this is not an ideal world. It is a real world in which borders are necessary to keep some semblance of order and peace.

One of the largest companies the world has ever known has gone bankrupt. Over the last five years, its stock was selling near the fifty dollar range at times; for a few weeks it stayed near a dollar before being de-listed last week. How could this happen?

Government is spending outrageous amounts of tax, borrowed, and fiat printed money. In large part this is done to support new government hires and social programs. The end result is increasing numbers of people dependent on government and of the belief that they are entitled to a life of milk and honey regardless of what they do.

America is split into two philosophically opposing camps. There are those of Democrat-Socialist-Communist-Liberal (left) leaning. The others are Republican-Libertarian-Constitutionalist-Conservative (right) leaning. This results in constant political haggling and divisions, while at the same time all of us try to live together in peace.

One of the most important things to remember about socialism – or coercion of any kind – is it fails eventually because human beings have an innate desire for liberty and a strong need for personal property rights. In fact, the origins of government lie in the need of agricultural communities to protect themselves from violence and theft. So it is particularly ironic that in more recent times, it is government itself that has more frequently played the role of bandit. When you start taxing people at extreme rates to pay for socialist "benefits," when you start telling them which schools their children must attend, when you start giving jobs away to people based on race instead of ability... you quash human freedom, which bogs down productivity... and if continued for long enough, leads to social collapse.

Who ever thought we'd see the government running multitrillion dollar deficits, taking over health care, bullying, regulating, and taxing productive business out of business, owning banks, creating a permanent dependent underclass, be the number one employer in the country paying beyond private sector scale, destroying entrepreneurial incentive, printing fiat money by the boatload, and politicians treating themselves like royalty on our dime.

You can pretty much figure that when some cause gains enough critical mass to become popular and cause significant money to flow, that cause has little to do with truth, and a lot to do with money and power.

It is hard not to wonder what has brought our country to the state it is now in. Trillions are being thrown around like pin money. A trillion. That’s a thousand billion! That’s like trying to comprehend infinity to those of us searching for a gas pump charging a couple pennies less.

In this video, incredible creativity and ingenuity is demonstrated. (My creations, a new form of life) But notice the use of the words "animal" and "evolution" in relation to the robots. The implication is that humans can create living creatures and that those creatures evolve.

I am not a religionist. Now then, with that straw man set aside, I have a gripe with The Scientist—and most other science journals, as well as lay publications that follow their lead. Repeatedly woven into the thread of articles, editorials, and letters is reference to evolution as if it were a fact. If that declaration is not made outright, it is sure intimated with attitude and allusions.

There are about 300,000 species of flowering angiosperms today. They fill our world with wonder, color, and scent. Their roots, fruits, and seeds feed us, clothe us, and shelter us, and their biomass provides fuel. Their takeover of planet Earth occurred (it is speculated, since all dating methods into prehistory are speculation) about 100 million years ago. There are no transitions to flowers in the geological record, they just suddenly appear and in perfusion. Researchers have a bounty of analytical tools such as synchrotron radiation, fossils, biochemistry, genomic data, and so on, but they have not a clue how these plant creatures evolved.

In a recent issue of The Scientist, in an article entitled, “The Devolution of Evolution,” the author, in a somewhat reverential tone, laments the shortfall of evolutionary training in new grads. He argues that not getting enough evolutionary pabulum ladled to students makes them less fit for their careers.
The article caught my attention for all its nonsense, so I wrote a letter to the editor. That particular science journal is replete with evolutionary bias so the chances of them printing my response is probably nil. But I had to vent.

When we think of humans and speed, the 100 yard dash at 9 seconds or driving a vehicle or airplane at hundreds of miles per hour come to mind. We don’t think of the human body itself as speedy. Cut it open and about the only thing that is even moving is the heart and the slow peristaltic wave-like contractions along the digestive tract. The rest, the brain, liver, muscles, and so on just seem to sit there.

When we are faced with problems we cannot easily solve, or that cannot be solved, we think blame. Common scapegoats are others and "God." The horrors and cruelty in the world are, in fact, the primary reason the notion of God is rejected. If a supposedly perfectly just being is capable of interceding but doesn't, that is sufficient proof for many that such a being does not exist. Religions may attempt to solve this by arguing that suffering is due to "original sin" (attributing to God the injustice of visiting the sins of parents on their children), or they may erect a theodicy (reconciling evil in the world with God's attributes by saying he went on vacation after making everything).

We get so cocky with our microscopes, telescopes, test tubes, and atomic colliders. By using our technology to take things apart, we come to think we know. But what do we ever come to know, really? Is it not just about things that are already here? We create nothing, we just explore, steal, borrow, and rearrange what has been given to us.

Disclaimer: This information has been created solely for educational purposes. It is the sharing of knowledge gained through decades of Dr. Wysong's experience and research. Dr. Wysong and others at the Wysong organization are not engaged in giving medical advice or services. The information provided is not to be construed as a relationship of diagnostician/prescriber (Wysong) and patient (you), but as educator (Wysong) and information seeker (you). Wysong information is not intended as medical advice or to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional. The reader understands that everything done or tried as a result from reading this information or anything on the related websites is at his or her own risk. Dr. Wysong and his staff shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss, damage or injury caused, or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the information provided. It is fully the reader's choice as to how they act or don't act upon the educational information Wysong presents.

Information on this site may be copied intact with copyright, source, and authorship identified, and provided it is used only in not-for-profit purposes. Copying beyond excerpts and individual articles, or any other use requires specific permission by Dr. Wysong.