I haven't been able to find an opponent for months, I really liked the 1v1 random maps, but it seems nobody wants to play those. I don't understand why so many people play 3v3 games, do you really like waiting for your turn?

I haven't been able to find an opponent for months, I really liked the 1v1 random maps, but it seems nobody wants to play those. I don't understand why so many people play 3v3 games, do you really like waiting for your turn?

The ATG community is very small, the game has been out for a long time now. The players that are left have already played many 1 vs 1 and now turned to 2 vs 2 or more for a change.

Webizen -> RE: does anyone play 1v1 games? (9/12/2012 3:33:01 AM)

Jay, welcome back to the forum! You are correct that the ATG community is small (as is the entire wargaming community). In addition to what you stated, there is also a sizable number of ATG players that simply prefer to play games vs the AI. I would be interested in an occasional 1vs1 game except I keep getting myself into these multi-player games of 2v2 or 3v3.

Jay, if you haven't got the latest beta patch (v2.11) you should download it. It has some nice enhancements of the random game generator.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jay Doubleyo

The ATG community is very small, the game has been out for a long time now. The players that are left have already played many 1 vs 1 and now turned to 2 vs 2 or more for a change.

Adam the game I sent you is you move first. If you just alter the folder name to Tom 001b once you have completed your turn and place the file in the dropbox .

Calliope -> RE: does anyone play 1v1 games? (9/19/2012 2:35:28 AM)

Yeah Jay is correct and few of people want to play in 1v1 game now and much fewer players are interested in random game. I still cherish the memory of playing 1v1 with Jay, an extremely skillful player. [:D] but after that it seems that no one would be glad to join a 1v1 random game. [&:]

Adam and inronduke if you are interested in 1v1 random game plz mail me at any time you wish.

Not at all I just made a assumption and as we know assumption is the mother and father of all foul ups.

Madlok -> RE: does anyone play 1v1 games? (9/23/2012 12:37:06 PM)

Calliope and I just finished our game. But now Calliope is busy and he can't start new game. So I'm looking for an opponent. My preferences for random map settings are: - map small or medium with wild land or possibly large map with deserted lands - fog of war, PBEM protection, passwords, creator cannot have seen the map (only if shroud is on) - any settings else are OK for me (crazy things like crates, no mirror map, shroud, etc. I don't care), but if you set climate option different than "no climate", give me an info, because there is no info in briefing. - P1 (player 1) has to declare war before turn 6. I can play some not random small scenario too. My mail is [img]http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/9626/adrescaptcha.png[/img] (type this manually, I don't want spambots)

Calliope -> RE: does anyone play 1v1 games? (9/23/2012 5:08:07 PM)

Madlok is a very skillful player and the game will be challenging. His opponent will be under strong pressure all the time I think.[8|] And good luck to Madlok in future games. [:'(]

Also an advise. The cost of 20PP to declare war in turn 1 for the first mover is relative balance when you are holding a one town start game. But if the game is normal and players have many cities initially, the 20PP can be ignored and the first mover will have huge advantages that makes the game unfaired. So this rule can be only used in one town start game I think. For the normal game, the balance way is 2v2 even if only two players there but each one can control 2 allied countries is ok. And the order is :A1,B1,B2,A2,A1.... A balanced rule will make big difference to both skillful players so let us pay attention to that. [:D]