SUBSCRIBE:

Digital rights activism around the world in 2012

Share

(EFF/IFEX) - January 3, 2013 - Just as in the United States, where a multi-pronged campaign against SOPA and PIPA killed the freedom-restricting bills, activism for digital rights saw great successes - and innovations - in 2012. While not every campaign was as successful in quashing efforts to restrict rights, it was nonetheless a great year worldwide for digital activism. Here are a few highlights:

Pakistanis against filtering

Back in February, the Pakistani government issued a request for proposals (RFP) for a filtering system that would allow them to block up to 60 million URLs. In response, local and international organizations alike took a stand for free expression, deploying a multi-faceted strategy in opposition to the government's plans. EFF joined a global coalition of organizations in issuing a letter to the relevant authorities, while local organizations such as Bolo Bhi and Bytes4All fought with all of their might to discourage companies from responding to the RFP.

And it worked! As Global Voices Advocacy recently recapped, five multinational companies "sided with the movement," refusing to offer bids to the government. The Global Network Initiative added its voice. Access Now got nearly 20,000 people to sign a petition calling on companies to abstain from bidding. In the end, a global movement came together in solidarity to stand for human rights.

Europe and ACTA

After years of pushback from activists and public interest groups around the world against its secretive negotiation process and dangerous intellectual property provisions, the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) was handed a resounding defeat in Europe with a rare sweeping majority vote in the European Parliament. Following street protests, public actions, and even members of the Polish Parliament donning Guy Fawkes masks in opposition, ACTA was all but left for dead on July 4, 2012.

Although that blow significantly weakened the once-formidable trade agreement, the struggle against lopsided international agreements that would undermine freedom of expression is not over. For one thing, ACTA remains on the table outside of Europe. For another, still more trade agreements, like the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP), are being negotiated in a process completely lacking in transparency.
The Lebanese Internet Regulation Act

The Lebanese Internet Regulation Act, or LIRA, was a fairly absurd bill by most accounts. Intended to offer some structure to the country's largely unregulated networks, the bill overreached, banning various types of speech and placing conditions on who could own a website.

As Lebanese media expert Magda Abu Fadil recounted, LIRA was "no laughing matter for Lebanese cyber activists who treasure their online freedom, and see how social media can be used as game changers in their own country as well as the Middle East/North Africa region where revolts have been raging for over a year."

Though Lebanon does not have a strong organized digital rights scene (perhaps owing to the fact that the country's Internet has always been mostly unrestricted), Lebanese activists quickly came together to defeat LIRA, with a campaign that included explanatory videos, eye-catching images, and a Twitter hashtag, #StopLIRA. Their work paid off: Following the intense public outcry, LIRA was shelved.
Jordanians rise up against censorship

In August, Jordan's parliament considered amending its Press and Publication law to allow the government to censor pornographic content. In a country where (uniquely in its region) the Internet has remained largely open, citizens were rightly concerned and argued that the legislation was too broad and poorly defined, and that the introduction of technical filtering could easily be abused to block other forms of content.

In response, a multitude of stakeholders rallied to take a stance against censorship. Activists were joined by members of the country's startup community and together, the various individuals and groups began working to raise awareness. One tactic used by the groups was a SOPA-style blackout, while the hashtag #BlackOutJo was used to spread the word on Twitter (even Queen Noor, the queen dowager, joined in!) In the tradition of the Speaker's Corner, an Internet freedom tent was set up, becoming a meeting place for journalists, opposition figures, and trade union activists united in their opposition to the amendment. The amendment, and ensuing protests, were covered by global media and supported by international organizations, including EFF and Access Now.

Although the actions managed to raise local awareness and garner significant global attention, the fight in Jordan continues.

The Philippines Against the CyberCrime Prevention Act

In September, the CyberCrime Prevention Act was signed into law in the Philippines, bringing to mind for many the country's history of martial law. The Act, which among other things criminalizes libel, was immediately met with substantial opposition, and the country's digital and human rights community rallied to organize a SOPA-style blackout, which occurred on October 3.

In addition to the blackout, several groups submitted a petition to the court, resulting in the issuance of a temporary restraining order by the Supreme Court on October 9. The order, set to expire in February, continues to be challenged by the government, but advocates in the country continue their fight against censorship.

Egypt's Media Blackout

In December, Egyptian news outlets staged their own SOPA-style blackout to protest provisions of the country's draft constitution that would restrict free expression. The revolutionary message posted by one paper, the Egypt Independent, read: "You are reading this message because Egypt Independent objects to continued restrictions on media liberties, especially after hundreds of Egyptians gave their lives for freedom and dignity."

The online protest was coupled with massive street protests that continue into the new year.

Digital Rights:

More from Digital Rights

Internet freedom has declined for the sixth consecutive year, with more governments than ever before targeting social media and communication apps as a means of halting the rapid dissemination of information, particularly during anti-government protests.

This publication presents the findings of the media development assessment in Mongolia that began in 2012 to determine the state of the media in the country. The assessment was based on the UNESCO/IPDC Media Development Indicators (MDIs), an internationally recognized analytical tool used to provide detailed overviews of national media landscapes and related media development priorities.

The report features present FoE practices on internet in Nepal and analyses existing policy, laws and constitution affecting the practice of freedom of expression. It seeks to advance the debate on this topic, thereby augmenting digital rights to make democracy's pillars more sustainable and more functional.

The report is a frank assessment of the recent regime of online censorship and mass surveillance against a backdrop of longstanding, serious abuses of the judicial process and attacks on freedom of expression by Turkish authorities.

The report surveys the rocky landscape for media and public discourse since the ruling military junta lifted the curtain on the southeast Asian nation in 2012 after five decades of isolation from the modern world.

The Cross Community Working Party on ICANN’s Corporate and Social Responsibility to Respect Human Rights (CCWP-HR) prepared this paper for presentation and discussion at ICANN54 in Dublin in October 2015. This paper is intended to build on and complement the previous reports published by the Council of Europe and ARTICLE 19 on ICANN’s responsibility to respect human rights.

The Pakistani government has significantly expanded its communication interception activities. This Privacy International report covers the intelligence services plan to capture all IP-traffic in Pakistan and other initiatives, pointing to gaps in the laws governing surveillance.

What is the correlation between the online and offline behaviour of Iranian citizens and the likelihood of their arrest in Iran today? Answering this question is the main focus of this new ARTICLE 19 report.

The need to regulate the transfer of surveillance technologies that pose a risk to human rights has been largely recognised by EU institutions and some EU member states. It is no longer a question of if the EU should do more in this area, but how.

Cambodian Internet users overwhelmingly see the country’s Internet as increasingly becoming more accommodating of free expression but remain concerned about the effects of recently proposed government actions related to Internet surveillance and controls, according to the results of a study by CCIM, which surveyed almost 1,000 Cambodian Internet users from 22 provinces.

IFEX publishes original and member-produced free expression news and reports. Some member content has been edited by IFEX. We invite you to contact [email protected] to request permission to reproduce or republish in whole or in part content from this site.