In message <3.0.32.19970527065333.00a1fe80@pop.intergate.bc.ca> Tim Bray writes:
> Meta-question:
[...]
>
> Anyhow, would people consider it an abuse of this mailing list if
> the odd job posting started showing up? I personally think it would
> be good, simply as a service to the industry we're trying to create,
> and as a useful barometer of what's going on out there. - Tim
Personally I wouldn't have a problem, but it's Henry who does the hard
work behind the scenes. Job listings would certainly give the impression
would certainly give the impression XML is going places. [Just give me
a private copy as well :-)].
While I'm posting, this is probably a trivial XML/SGML question, but I am
worried about EMPTY content in WF documents. As far as I can see, in
validated SGML
<!Doctype A [
<!ELEMENT A - o EMPTY>
]>
<A>
and
<!DOCTYPE A [
<!element a - - ANY>
]>
<A></A>
both return the same result, and that seems to be the same with NXP
both validating and non-validating (the first example uses <A/> of course).
Is there any way that the content could be returned as a null string ("")?
Can attributes have null values? is
B="" the same as omitting B when #IMPLIED?
P.
--
Peter Murray-Rust, domestic net connection
Virtual School of Molecular Sciences
http://www.vsms.nottingham.ac.uk/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@ic.ac.uk)