Sunday, 5 June 2011

BRITISH EXPERTS: MCCANNS EVIDENCE DOES NOT ADD UP

30 May 2011 - Credit: Justice For Maddie BlogBRITISH
EXPERTS: MCCANNS EVIDENCE DOES NOT ADD UP"I wonder why the
McCanns did not threaten to sue these experts for "libel" or the Daily Mirror
for publishing it? It is hard to attack the truth, their story never has added
up and tells both British and Portuguese Police loud and clear, they are not
looking for anyone else, no matter how many weirdos the McCanns use public
monies to come up with. At the time, even the FSS commented the inquiry is
focussing in the right direction.

I applaud David Cameron for taking a
step for children and for justice. Who knows I may even change the habit of a
lifetime and vote for him!

EXCLUSIVE THE HUNT FOR MADELEINE Brit team questions Kate's
reaction A team of British crime specialists who have scrutinised the
Madeleine McCann case claim there are inconsistencies in her parents' version of
events.

The retired experts believe there is a question mark over Kate's
response when she discovered the four-year-old was missing. Forensic
scientist Professor David Barclay, part of the four-man team who reviewed the
case for Channel Four's Dispatches show, said: "We examined all of the available
evidence and the conclusion we came to was that there appeared to be some
significant inconsistencies. "One thing we looked for was any sign of
'staging', the term we use for the actions of someone who has committed a crime
and wants to 'stage it' to appear someone else has done it.

"The first
words apparently spoken by Kate McCann when she discovered Madeleine had
vanished were significant. She is supposed to have said 'They've taken her,
they've taken her' - which seems a strange choice of phrase.

"I don't
think that would have been my first reaction if my child had gone missing."

Prof Barclay also questioned the McCanns' claims that an abductor got
into their Praia da Luz holiday flat through the back shutters.

He said:
"We checked the scene of the crime and it struck us immediately how unlikely it
would be for anyone to try and access the apartment through the back windows.
The shutters there were firmly shut and couldn't be opened and the car park
behind the flat was overlooked."We're not saying it was impossible to have
gained entry that way, but with all of our collected years of experience to us
it seemed highly unlikely and a very implausible scenario.

"It could be
that claim is consistent with staging, but without full knowledge of all of the
facts in the case it would be impossible to say for sure."

The will seen on tonight's show visiting key
sites and seeing footage of the police in action.

Prof Barclay, 62,
added: "There has been a tendency to criticise the Portuguese police but on the
whole they did a pretty good job. "However, they made two big mistakes.
Firstly, they did not seal of the crime scene anywhere nearly quick enough.
Secondly, in my opinion they were not aggressive enough with the McCanns in the
first stage of the investigation.

"It is actually for the parents'
benefit in cases like this that the police tackle them robustly and demand a
comprehensive account of their movements during the relevant timeframe."

2013 Economic Recession:Do you agree with the Metropolitan Police (NSY, England) being attributed an EXTRA £6,228 per DAY towards investigating the McCann case?Their staff is already paid monthly; there are no reports to show the public what is being done.

Subscribe -thank you for thinking-

Thanks if you share:

Followers

About Me

My name is not megafundline. But I care for Children and would find it logical to see that a case for a Child would still be open, not archived. As many others, I want the truth to be exposed, and justice to be done. So "about me" there is nothing else here, because this blog is not about me.