yeah i see that now...could barely see it in the hidden corners but i see the bldg now, i mean there's sooo much smoke that i guess the Smoke did make the building collapse...cuz smoke usually means that right?...lol

i've seen Large houses burn (i was a firefighter for 4 yrs) funny thing is these houses were built our of WOOD...when we'd let uncontrollable fire's within these houses burn, it would go on like such...but silly thing is, a 3-4 story house doesnt Collapse?...why is that?...i've seen apartments that stand 6+ stories get smashed into by a semi truck and rip out sections of the bottom of the Apartment in a far more measurable distance campared to building size then what is missing on the wtc7...yet the Main Frame stays intact, with FIre burning...with Wood framed units...hmmm...and never once did i see a WOOD house crumble from smoke...i mean, all that Grey smoke should be obvious to anyone that the firefighters were trying to do they're job and put out the Fire which produces Large amounts of smoke...and the 2 buildings that fell prior to the wtc7, they didnt at any event, any time, help induce the Amounts of Smoke surrounding that building? which in any case, would not have made the wtc7 bldg fall...Smoke/FIRE in a larger aspect has never made a Building such as wtc7's structure/size ever fall...and if you claim the piece missing on the corner helped it cumble completely flat in under 10Sec's is very dillusional towards "Scientific Facts"

Click to expand...

lmao...come on man. just stop reaching.

i didnt say "smoke made the building" collapse. thats just a huge fallacy of yours.

i cant answer your question about why some houses dont collapse. i can research it for you though and let you know.

as far as the building being completely flat in under 10 seconds, thats another false statement. it actually took a minimum of 13 seconds to completely collapse. what most videos you view show is only the tail end of the collapse and not the penthouse starting to collapse on the top of the building.

lmfao@urb...man, you sure as hell cant debate worth a shit can you...i could have easily posted those pics myself...the damage isnt enough to make a building that size fall evenly into its prefect little section in (20 seconds now,lol) if you note, when a building collapses on itself, its a Crumbled or Tipping style...not a Collapse from bottom to Top...its the other way around to begin with...c'mon.

lmfao@urb...man, you sure as hell cant debate worth a shit can you...i could have easily posted those pics myself...the damage isnt enough to make a building that size fall evenly into its prefect little section in (20 seconds now,lol) if you note, when a building collapses on itself, its a Crumbled or Tipping style...not a Collapse from bottom to Top...its the other way around to begin with...c'mon.

Click to expand...

yes...per this picture...the building sure did fall on top of itself in a nice little pile:

nimrod saying "ha these niggas see conspiracy films and call it research"

wow thats funny because all i posted was documented video evidence from cnn and bbc..

the picture that nusince posted that had the MOST damage would suggest that seeing as how the majority of the mass of the building is ABOVE the damage.. that the building would LEAN OVER AND FALL.. not collapse symetrically.. try again debunker noob.. and get your sources straight..

and nimrod.. you would be surprised at how many engineers question 911.. go google it..

isnt that video or what your implying where he gets his info from, basically the same stuff you guys are doing? just on the opposite end of the spectrum?

it basically comes down to this: you think hes ridiculous, he thinks your ridiculous..

theres actually nothing wrong with that, except to mock him based on how or where he gathers his facts is kind of stupid because look at where you guys are gathering yours from.. lol.. his are a lot more direct then the manipulated propaganda that most, not all, but most conspiracy theorists are giving.. besides, his sources arent trying to sell us a dvd for 19.99 after all is said and done..

thats the equivalent of me sourcing infowars.com ... even worse because alex jones actually doesnt have any obvious motive or agenda to be biased... a government propaganda site on the other hand ?? hmmm..

isnt that video or what your implying where he gets his info from, basically the same stuff you guys are doing? just on the opposite end of the spectrum?

it basically comes down to this: you think hes ridiculous, he thinks your ridiculous..

theres actually nothing wrong with that, except to mock him based on how or where he gathers his facts is kind of stupid because look at where you guys are gathering yours from.. lol.. his are a lot more direct then the manipulated propaganda that most, not all, but most conspiracy theorists are giving.. besides, his sources arent trying to sell us a dvd for 19.99 after all is said and done..

Click to expand...

i gather mine from self incriminating news clips, quotes and even documents from the people themselves.. i actually am open to both sides.. its not my fault that the official story is so horribly twisted.. its honestly more of a conspiracy than any conspiracy films ive watched.. why cant he find something better than debunking911.com ??

it's strange how the rescue workers and the victims families are now the ones asking for another investigation yet people still criticize them...

thats the equivalent of me sourcing infowars.com ... even worse because alex jones actually doesnt have any obvious motive or agenda to be biased... a government propaganda site on the other hand ?? hmmm..

debunking911.com though.. that was cute lmaooooooo

Click to expand...

the difference is

those sites gather information from experts

u know, people who actually know what they are talkin about becus theyve been educated in the subject?