You can think about our name whatever you want. I do not care about it. We are a group of alliances that promised to protect each other and NC has attacked one of us. That is the reason why some of us have assambled to protect CK.

Really? Did you make your concerns known to NC before you declared or did you find it easier to declare war after the other five alliances piled on? While we are talking about "fairness", you don't have an issue that your group of buddies outnumber NC 10:1 in pop? Rather hypocritical on your part.

I think this is a classic bandwagon example and I think it is poor form as I doubt many of your members are really geared for war.

Starry wrote:

Really? Did you make your concerns known to NC before you declared or did you find it easier to declare war after the other five alliances piled on? While we are talking about "fairness", you don't have an issue that your group of buddies outnumber NC 10:1 in pop? Rather hypocritical on your part.

Why is it that these questions concerning NC are being asked by members of a totally different alliance. Is it because you are seeking to paint them in a bad light so that you can make up some fictional cause to declare war on them as you have done with EE?

Give it a rest both of you. Everybody has soon through H? by now. All you are doing is creating more bad feeling in the forums. It's not fun, and you don't get kudos from it so leave it out.

I have forgotten the password for my GNT forum account, so will blab on here with this account.

@Torden - NAAM has prepared, I am not sure in our military capabilities but we have troops.. Does that count?

@Starry - NAAM made known that this would not stand, and after several failed agreements to halt this rather silly war (and other alliances declaring on NC and wanting to use NAAM as reserves) we decided to declare war to make sure the little ones would not be picked on anymore.

This is not hypocritical, because most large alliances have done this at some point in time - and much as I would love to declare NAAM to be unique etc, it really is no different.

"We imagine a loose (and maybe sometimes closer) community of alliances with good intentions that aim to cooperate for the good of their alliances and all of Illyriad, without being pushed around by large alliances or annihilated for whatever reason."

So in your support of alliances not being pushed around by larger alliances. You join together with a bunch of other large alliances to push around a smaller one? Will you start targeting new players next?

Say you are in a family group, and someone is beating your little sibling. Granted, you may be bigger than the bully - but that should not stop you from helping your younger sibling and stopping the conflict.

I think you are under the impression that NAAM is out for an extermination campaign, I would deny this - but you seem to have made up your mind about this already so whatever I say would be wrong.

@Torden - NAAM has prepared, I am not sure in our military capabilities but we have troops.. Does that count?

No. It annoys me to no end that you market yourselves as "the non aligned (neutral)" confederation - strongly implying to your average recruit, that the driving motivation is pacifism, and then drag your members into this war. The fact that they have joined you strongly implies they have NO CLUE about warfare, yet you are placing them in situations far beyond your own control.

So no, it doesn't count that they have troops, because everyone else have more. And I find it remarkably indifferent and irresponsible simply to place all those small accounts between yourself and the siege engines.

This is bad leadership, plain and simple.

"FYI - if you had any balls you'd be posting under your in-game name." - KP

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot create polls in this forumYou cannot vote in polls in this forum