Hillary refuses to take question from a crowd member...the reason is horrible...

I have read multiple times recently in the press about how it is so 'convienent' that Hillary has people ask her questions at her rallys that easily
give her the oppurtunity to respond and make her rivals look horrible.

Case 1

The little girl who deals with bullies...Clinton made sure it was associated with Trump

Katherine Prudhomme O'Brien, a GOP state representative from Rockingham, stood up feet from Clinton and began shouting. After Clinton
dispatched the protestor once, O'Brien tried again during another lull in the program.

"You are very rude and I'm not never ever going to call on you," Clinton said forcefully, looking directly at the woman. "Thank you."

Why, in this setting, would you not answer anyone's question?

Clinton rolled out a plan to address campaign sexual assault in 2015, telling an audience in Iowa that rape victims "have the right to be
believed."

"Today I want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault," Clinton said. "Don't let anyone silence your voice. You have the right to be
heard. You have the right to be believed and we're with you."

Clinton rolled out a plan to address campaign sexual assault in 2015, telling an audience in Iowa that rape victims "have the right to be
believed."

"Today I want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault," Clinton said. "Don't let anyone silence your voice. You have the right to be
heard. You have the right to be believed and we're with you."

My god, how could anyone vote for someone like this? How could a party get behind someone who knows what their partner does but will not address it.
An enabler is who.

"I asked her how in the world she can say that Juanita Broderick and Kathleen Wiley are lying when she has no idea who Juanita Broderick is," O'Brien
said. "She told me this summer she doesn't know who she is and doesn't want to know who she is. How can she access that they are lying, which she told
someone last month?"

The "rude" woman who asked the "rude" questions is also a rape survivor.
THIS is from her FACEBOOK regarding why she asked Hillary Clinton these questions:

This is my response to a man who wanted to know why I asked the questions as rudely as I did;
Thank you for asking what I was so concerned with. I appreciate your interest.

It all started when I saw Juanita Broaddrick give an hour long interview on Dateline NBC to Lisa Myers in 1999 where she said she was raped by Bill
Clinton in 1978. You can find a video of it on Youtube. I believed her so when Al Gore was running for president, I asked him if he believed her too
because I was shocked that women's groups like NOW were not demanding answers. Gore told me that he doesn't know the story but that I should forgive
Clinton anyway as if I was asking about an affair, not a crime.

After Broaddrick saw that question on TV, she called me and I asked her all the questions people were throwing at me about why she may not be telling
the truth. I was in a support group at the time for rape and sexual assault survivors and I know this subject better than I want to. We also visited
convicted sex offenders and rapists at the state prison and discussed our side of the issue with them and listened to theirs. It was very informative,
to say the least. I often felt sympathy for some of the things they went through but made it clear that acting on their anger or selfishness or
whatever made them do that was never OK.

During the call Broaddrick made to me back then, she told me that she felt that Hillary personally threatened her soon after the attack, threatened to
keep quiet about it. I specifically asked if she could have thought it was consensual.

a reply to: matafuchs
I saw the video. The person was asking about Hillary Clinton's husbands past. And the same person has followed Hillary Clinton around asking this.
There is no reason to answer this person yelling things out.

That person is also a Republican state representative. How convenient to get media attention over this.

The book, by former Texas Monthly and Newsweek reporter Harry Hurt III, described a harrowing scene. After a painful scalp reduction surgery to
remove a bald spot, Donald Trump confronted his then-wife, who had previously used the same plastic surgeon.

“Your #ing doctor has ruined me!” Trump cried.

What followed was a “violent assault,” according to Lost Tycoon. Donald held back Ivana’s arms and began to pull out fistfuls of hair from her
scalp, as if to mirror the pain he felt from his own operation. He tore off her clothes and unzipped his pants.

“Then he jams his penis inside her for the first time in more than sixteen months. Ivana is terrified… It is a violent assault,” Hurt writes.
“According to versions she repeats to some of her closest confidantes, ‘he raped me.’”

Following the incident, Ivana ran upstairs, hid behind a locked door, and remained there “crying for the rest of night.” When she returned to the
master bedroom in the morning, he was there.

She accused him of rape in a court deposition and as part of the divorce settlement was legally bound not to talk about anything regarding the
marriage without Trump's consent. She was raped....and then silenced. But what really stuck-out was when Trump's spokesmen said on the record that
"you cannot rape your wife".

It is also fact that he had an affair with Marla Maples while he was married to Ivana.

originally posted by: thesaneone
It never fails after 3-4 post the topic about Hillary gets changed to topic about Trump.

Double standard I see.

It fine to point out how the Clintons are "alleged" raping scum bags but lets ignore the other leading candidates also a "alleged" rapist too!

I should be seeing condemnation for BOTH Hillary and Trump here.

The hyporcray of ATS astounds me

Disagree, my friend. Hillary didn't cheat on anyone, nor did she rape anyone. Trump is a self-admitted cheater and "allegedly" raped his own
wife....and used a divorce settlement to silence her from talking about her experience.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.