Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is.
I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Monday, June 17, 2013

A Tale of Two Sets

-
Given 2 sets, A and B, if A contains all of the members of B AND has members B does
not, A's cardinality has to be greater than B's.

And the predicted
unsupported and cowardly response of "Joe doesn't understand infinity", is duly
noted.

Answer: Yes. AZ is equivalent to a proper subset of P(AZ). You are saying that P(AZ) is a proper subset of AZ. Therefore AZ is equivalent to a proper subset of itself, which means AZ is Dedekind-infinite. It follows that AZ is infinite in the normal sense.

So if you have a problem with "infinity" for this reason, you also have a problem with CSI. You should tell KF that FSCIO/I will cease to exist when there are no longer agencies capable of thinking about it, therefore it's a bogus concept.