This copy is for your personal non-commercial use only. To order
presentation-ready copies of Toronto Star content for distribution
to colleagues, clients or customers, or inquire about
permissions/licensing, please go to: www.TorontoStarReprints.com

How statements on Trump and Trump Tower meeting changed

MJ

By Mary Clare JalonickThe Associated Press

Tue., June 5, 2018timer3 min. read

WASHINGTON—For months, U.S. President Donald Trump’s legal team, the White House press secretary and others in Trump’s orbit said he did not dictate or help draft a June 2017 statement trying to explain the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting between his eldest son and a Russian lawyer.

Turns out, that wasn’t true.

In a January letter to special counsel Robert Mueller, Trump’s lawyers said the president “dictated a short but accurate response” to the first report that his son, Donald Trump Jr., and others had met with the Russian lawyer during the 2016 presidential election.

The New York Times revealed the existence of the letter on Saturday.

The Trump Tower meeting — and the White House’s initial response to the first reports of the meeting — has been a key moment in Mueller’s investigation into whether anyone on the campaign colluded with Russia and whether Trump obstructed justice. The lawyers’ statement is buried near the end of the 20-page memo, which asserts that Trump cannot be forced to testify and argues that he could not have legally committed obstruction of justice.

In the initial written statement from Trump Jr. on June 8, 2017, he said the Trump Tower gathering was a “short introductory meeting” focused on a disbanded program that had allowed American adoptions of Russian children. Moscow ended the adoptions in response to Magnitsky Act sanctions created in response to alleged human rights violations in Russia.

While the Magnitsky Act was discussed, it was later revealed that the meeting was held on the promise of damaging information about his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton. Trump Jr. did not mention the promise of dirt on Clinton until a statement the next day.

A look at the evolving explanations from the administration on how the statement was drafted:

JULY 16, 2017: In one of a series of interviews in June, Trump lawyer Jay Sekulow said on NBC’s Meet The Press that “the president was not, did not, draft the response. The response came from Donald Trump Jr. and, I’m sure, in consultation with his lawyer.”

He added: “The president was not involved in the drafting of the statement and did not issue the statement. It came from Donald Trump Jr. So that’s what I can tell you because that’s what we know.”

JULY 31, 2017: In response to a Washington Post report that Trump had dictated the statement, Sekulow issued a statement: “Apart from being of no consequence, the characterizations are misinformed, inaccurate, and not pertinent.”

AUGUST 1, 2017: White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders said that Trump “certainly didn’t dictate, but he — like I said, he weighed in, offered suggestion like any father would do.” Sanders argued there was “no inaccuracy” in the statement.

SEPTEMBER 7, 2017: In a closed-door interview with Senate Judiciary Committee staff, Trump Jr. was asked by investigators whether his father was involved in drafting the statement. He said he didn’t know, and that he had never spoken to his father about it. Asked again, Trump Jr. said his father “may have commented through Hope Hicks,” who was Trump’s longtime aide.

Investigators then asked if Trump Jr. knew if any of Trump’s comments were incorporated into the final statement.

“I believe some may have been, but this was an effort through lots of people, mostly counsel,” Trump Jr. responded.

Trump Jr. said he was asked if he wanted to speak to his father as the statement was drafted, but he said he “chose not to because I didn’t want to bring him into something that he had nothing to do with.”

JANUARY 29, 2018: In the letter to Mueller, Trump’s then-lawyers wrote: “You have received all of the notes, communications and testimony indicating that the President dictated a short but accurate response to the New York Times article on behalf of his son, Donald Trump, Jr. His son then followed up by making a full public disclosure regarding the meeting, including his public testimony that there was nothing to the meeting and certainly no evidence of collusion.”

JUNE 4, 2018: Asked about the discrepancies on Monday, Sanders repeatedly declined to answer and referred reporters to Trump’s personal lawyers.

Get more of what matters in your inbox

Start your morning with everything you need to know, and nothing you don't. Sign up for First Up, the Star's new daily email newsletter.

More from The Star & Partners

More News

Top Stories

Copyright owned or licensed by Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All
rights reserved. Republication or distribution of this content is
expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Toronto
Star Newspapers Limited and/or its licensors. To order copies of
Toronto Star articles, please go to: www.TorontoStarReprints.com