already exists as an alternate
of this question.

exists and is an alternate of .

Not at all. He was quite the opposite. Laissez faire leaders keep
hands-off and let their staffs do their jobs with minimal
supervision. Hitler was in complete control of everything his
political party and his followers did. He kept a close watch on
them, and made sure they were carrying out his orders exactly. He
had advisers and members of his party whom he respected, but the
final say was his.
______________

Nazi leadership doctrine was actually rather more complex than
this. The Fuhrerprinzip ("leader principle") in fact
enshrined a good deal of autonomy at lower levels in the party
hierarchy, provided of course that lower functional and local
"leaders" were deemed to be acting in accordance with the supreme
leader's will. In practice this entailed a good deal of disorder
and outright thuggery even within the nazi party as would-be lesser
Fuhrers vied for position and gain. Provided it didn't undermine
nazi rule, such sometimes violent jockeying was considered a
desirable struggle for the survival of the fittest, thereby
improving the nazi stock. We saw how well that worked in 1945.

Answer Adam Smith played a large role in popularizing laissez-faire economic theories in English-speaking countries, though he was critical of a number of …aspects of what is currently thought of as laissez-faire (such as lack of government regulation of business practices). Laissez-faire philosophy was dominant throughout the late 19th and early 20th century in the wealthier countries of Europe and North America. Many historians also see that period as the height of laissez-faire's implementation in those countries. However, critics claim that what was described as "laissez-faire" policy was simply a proactive pro-business policy, and in practice there was little difference between pro-business and laissez-faire. In this context, laissez-faire rhetoric was used to justify denial of similar subsidies to the poor and working classes. Some believe these claims are still valid. Some argue that laissez-faire policies played a role in creating the Great Depression but many economists, such as Milton Friedman argue, that by the time of the Great Depression, significant government economic regulation had already taken place and that it was the Federal Reserve which caused the Depression, by creating an environment in which the market depended upon it to act, and then failing to take action. The action of the Federal Reserve has been compared to putting a penny in the fuse-box of the economy. Like pure communism, pure capitalism has never existed in the real world.

Willy Wonka was an example of a laissez-faire leader, as were the plantation owners in the 1700s and 1800s. Answer: Adam Smith is a real life example o…f a laissez-faire leader. He wrote many books including his thoughts on the invisible hand which still have merit in modern capitalism today.

The characteristics of the laissez faire style include: Allows followers to have complete freedom to make decisions concerning the completion of their work or ask questio…ns of the leader The leader provides the followers with the materials they need to accomplish their goals and answers questions to the follower's questions http://www.money-zine.com/Definitions/Career-Dictionary/Laissez-Faire-Leadership-Style/