1. What card you are using?
2. What is your OC?
3. What is your ASIC?
(ASIC can be checked on gpu-z by clicking the top left corner to get the drop down menu)

I'll go first, considering I am the one starting the thread.
1. Gigabyte GTX 670 Windforce (probably the worst one to have made it past their quality control too, so I must get points for this right?)
2. 1059Base/1138CertifiedBoost/1202MaxBoost/6804Mem
3. ASIC: 89.0% ! ! !

compared to video cards in general yeah (my old 580 was getting 57% so yeah) but from what I've gathered most keplers are in the 98-100% range. guess it has something to do with the new 28nm process, also the fact that you get no voltage control makes it a disadvantage!

Both of mine have 100%. I haven't OC'd them though is that why? I haven't bothered to test out my OC on the MSI as it easily hits over 70 degrees in SLi and downclocks. Waiting till I get these puppies under water.

ok got a 2nd Gigabyte GTX 670 OC and I have no clue what is up with my luck....
ASIC at 82.8%...the card wasn't even stable stock until I updated the bios (still can't OC it though as anything higher than stock still isn't stable on the core).

What is up with my luck?

Update: the memory seems to be quite impressive considering how bad the gpu is. I'm getting it stable with no problems at +570 (didn't try any higher as I stopped seeing noticable performance increases after the +500s).

People reporting stock boosts of 1200mhz, while my first card could barely do this at max barely stable OC and the 2nd card can't even OC and gets boost of 1086mhz...(cooling is not an issue as these cards never get past 62-63C).