The infustion of the mantra, 'do not hurt the child's self-esteem' for the past 25 years has finally been proven irrelevant, if not harmful. Truth is, the idea of not using 'red ink' or in some cases, just not marking wrong answers, wrong, does NOT build self-esteem or lead to better performance down the line. I've always suspected that it makes those that aren't mastering the materia, feel 'just fine' and perhaps delusional about what they do and don't know:

It is difficult to get through a day in an American school without hearing maxims such as these: "To succeed, you must believe in yourself," and "To teach, you must relate the subject to the lives of students."

But the Brookings Institution is reporting today that countries such as the United States that embrace self-esteem, joy and real-world relevance in learning mathematics are lagging behind others that don't promote all that self-regard.

Consider Korea and Japan.

According to the Washington think tank's annual Brown Center report on education, 6 percent of Korean eighth-graders surveyed expressed confidence in their math skills, compared with 39 percent of U.S. eighth-graders. But a respected international math assessment showed Koreans scoring far ahead of their peers in the United States, raising questions about the importance of self-esteem.

In Japan, the report found, 14 percent of math teachers surveyed said they aim to connect lessons to students' lives, compared with 66 percent of U.S. math teachers. Yet the U.S. scores in eighth-grade math trail those of the Japanese, raising similar questions about the importance of practical relevance.

Tom Loveless, the report's author, said that the findings do not mean that student happiness causes low achievement. But he wrote that his analysis of the international math assessment, the 2003 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study, shows that U.S. schools should not be too quick to assume that happiness is what matters in the classroom.

"It is interesting that people grasp this notion in other areas of self-improvement -- eating healthy foods, getting exercise, saving for retirement -- but when it comes to education, for some reason, the limitations of happiness are forgotten," Loveless wrote.

Several countries in Asia and some in Europe tend to beat the United States in math scores, even though their students show less satisfaction with performance and less love of math, and even though the lessons they receive are less "relevant," the report found.

The report is likely to stoke a debate over teaching math and other subjects that has divided the United States for at least a century. Progressives say that what students choose to study and how they feel about education should matter as much, or more, in the classroom than test results; traditionalists say that gain requires some pain and that tests matter.

Alfie Kohn, a progressive author and lecturer, questioned the findings.

"Let me get this straight," Kohn said. "Kids who get higher scores on standardized tests are unhappy and self-doubting, so that means we should question the importance of happiness and self-confidence, rather than the importance of these tests?"​

Yup, this is what is 'taught' in university education classes.

Gerald W. Bracey, an educational psychologist and columnist for the education journal Phi Delta Kappan, said the report overlooked countervailing trends in Japan, Singapore and other countries that do better than the United States on eighth-grade math tests. Officials in those countries say their education systems are not yielding graduates who have the same level of creativity as American graduates. Some Asian nations have begun to copy aspects of U.S. education, including the emphasis on letting students search for answers rather than memorize them.

The Brookings report notes that in most countries, including Korea and the United States, students who like math and think they are good at it have higher math scores than those who don't. Perspective matters, Loveless wrote: Japanese students who would be considered good at the subject if they were in the United States think that they are not so good when compared with their peers in Japan.

The international test results from 2003 and related surveys from 46 countries show that the world's most confident eighth-grade math students are found in the Middle East, Africa and the United States. Of the 10 countries with the highest levels of student confidence, only Israel and the United States scored higher than average on the international test, and their scores were far below those of the much less confident students in Japan, Korea, Hong Kong and Taiwan.

The surveys asked teachers in each country whether they relate math lessons to daily life at least half of the time. In Chile, 87 percent of teachers answered affirmatively, the highest mark on the relevance scale. Japan was at the bottom of the list.

"The more relevant the math, the lower-scoring the nation," Loveless wrote.

Chester E. Finn Jr., president of the D.C.-based Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, said the report shows that schools need not be fun to be effective. "Schools should work on academics, not feelings," Finn said. "True self-esteem, self-confidence and happiness are born of true achievement."

Self esteem was the snake oil of the 1980s and 1990s. No evidence exists to suggest that higher self esteem equates to improved academic performance.

I believe it was based on Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory, which was debunked long ago....

I once read that the only group that did indeed have high self esteem were violent criminals. That explains why many of them do not respond to rehabilitation... they don't feel the need to reform. I'm sure Castro, Kim Jong Il, Saddam Hussein also have what psychologists call "high self esteem", but the rest of us call "pathological narcissism".

I think there's some confusion between real self-esteem, which is based on accomplishments and ability, as opposed to this blow sunshine up your butt, rainbow fish kinda garbage that I think destroys incentives and creates people who don't think they have to earn anything or accomplish anything.

I think there's some confusion between real self-esteem, which is based on accomplishments and ability, as opposed to this blow sunshine up your butt, rainbow fish kinda garbage that I think destroys incentives and creates people who don't think they have to earn anything or accomplish anything.

I agree. When they had the kids read that awful book in pre-K, I actually went up to see his teacher. Imagine, a book that tells kids that they won't be accepted if they're special, or talented or accomplished but they have to be like everyone else. Totally bizarre.... I ended up having a long talk with my son and I was really honest about why I hated that book. I think he understood.

I agree. When they had the kids read that awful book in pre-K, I actually went up to see his teacher. Imagine, a book that tells kids that they won't be accepted if they're special, or talented or accomplished but they have to be like everyone else. Totally bizarre.... I ended up having a long talk with my son and I was really honest about why I hated that book. I think he understood.

Useful Searches

About USMessageBoard.com

USMessageBoard.com was founded in 2003 with the intent of allowing all voices to be heard. With a wildly diverse community from all sides of the political spectrum, USMessageBoard.com continues to build on that tradition. We welcome everyone despite political and/or religious beliefs, and we continue to encourage the right to free speech.

Come on in and join the discussion. Thank you for stopping by USMessageBoard.com!