Sunday, February 28, 2010

From Conservativemonster.com:Sky News - Hawaii reports Obama's birth certificate lost in fire? The voices of protest are getting LOUDER

Hawaii is now reporting that Obama's original paper version of his birth certificate was lost in a fire? How many different stories are they going to release about ONE man's documents? How many different stories are the brainwashed fools in this country going to accept? This is a non-issue? I could not tell, because the left are fighting for their very survival to make this issue go away rather than a court trial.

We are past the point of documents, this is clearly a cover up and the people need to accept the fact that their president is ineligible and a fraud. Obama should be declared guilty of fraud in absentia of court, due to the intimidation and corruption of the Congress, Senate, the Supreme Court, Federal courts and the Joint Chief's.

It is time for special prosecutors to be appointed and depositions under oath to be taken.

Lets see how crazy we are when the frauds in the media are forced to testify UNDER OATH....

The American people need to speak out and say "enough is enough". Obama? Your deception in this entire controversy proves your guilt. The woman that lies in the Sky News video says that Obama "already released his records numerous times."

Releasing them on the internet is not valid procedure, these documents need to be released in court so they can be examined by experts. Obama, his staff, Pelosi, Howard Dean and the media puppets that are protecting Obama - Beck, Breitbart, Bill O', Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann and that other freak from MSNBC need to be investigated by the FBI and they need to testify under oath PUBLICLY.

The people need to know if there is a conspiracy by the media to cover up multiple felonies by the President and if so, they need to be thrown into the jail cell next to Obama. This is bigger than Watergate, because the media did not protect Nixon, but they are protecting Obama.

This issue should have been cleared up before the election, but the cover up was already locked in.

The media is desperately attacking Americans that dare to even bring up this crisis. This is behavior that has never been seen in modern times by the media in this country and these tactics come straight out of the USSR. They need to make this issue go away, because the bigger it grows shines more light on their alleged collaboration

The International Olympic Committee stunned the world this morning when they awarded U.S. President Barack Obama a gold medal for Men's Skiing, even though he's never skied. An IOC spokesman said, "Barack Obama is going downhill faster than anyone this year."

The White House called for a "simple up-or-down" vote on health-care legislation Sunday as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi appealed to House Democrats to get behind President Obama's chief domestic priority even it if threatens their political careers.

In voicing support for a simple majority vote, White House health reform director Nancy-Ann DeParle signaled Mr. Obama's intention to push the Democratic-crafted bill under Senate rules that would overcome GOP stalling tactics.

Republicans unanimously oppose the Democratic proposals. Without GOP support, Mr. Obama's only chance of emerging with a policy and political victory is to bypass the bipartisanship he promoted during his televised seven-hour health-care summit Thursday.

"We're not talking about changing any rules here," Ms. DeParle said. "All the president's talking about is: Do we need to address this problem, and does it make sense to have a simple, up-or-down vote on whether or not we want to fix these problems?"

Ms. DeParle was optimistic that the president would have the votes to pass the massive bill, but none of legislation's advocates who spoke on Sunday indicated that those votes were in hand.

"I think we will get to that point where we will have the votes," predicted Sen. Robert Menendez, New Jersey Democrat, who is a member of the Senate Democratic leadership. "I believe that we will pass health-care reform this spring."

In a sober call to arms, Mrs. Pelosi, California Democrat, said lawmakers sometimes must enact policies that, even if unpopular at the moment, will help the public. "We're not here just to self-perpetuate our service in Congress," she said. "We're here to do the job for the American people."

Mrs. Pelosi said it took courage for Congress to pass Social Security and Medicare, which eventually became highly popular, she said, "and many of the same forces that were at work decades ago are at work again against this bill."

It's unclear whether Mrs. Pelosi's remarks will embolden or chill dozens of moderate House Democrats who face withering criticisms of the health-care proposal in visits with constituents and in national polls. Republican lawmaker unanimously oppose the health-care proposals, and many GOP strategists believe voters will turn against Democrats in the November elections.

Mrs. Pelosi, from San Francisco, is more liberal than scores of her Democratic colleagues, but she generally walks a careful line between urging them to back left-of-center policies and giving them a green light to buck party leaders to improve their re-election hopes.

Her comments seemed to acknowledge the widely held view that Democrats will lose House seats this fall -- maybe a lot. They now control the chamber 255 to 178, with two vacancies. Mrs. Pelosi stopped well short of suggesting Democrats could lose their majority, but she called on members of her party to make a bold move on health care with no prospects of GOP help.

"Time is up," she said. "We really have to go forth."

Her comments somewhat echoed those of Mr. Obama, who said at the end of Thursday's bipartisan health-care summit that Congress should act on the issue and let voters render their verdicts. "That's what elections are for," he said.

The White House is redoubling efforts to remind voters that the Senate passed an Obama-backed health-care bill in December with 60 votes. Every Republican voted against that bill. A Republican Senate victory in Massachusetts in January, however, left Democrats one vote shy of the number necessary to overcome GOP filibusters.

As a result, a new plan would call for the House to pass the Senate bill and send it to Mr. Obama. The Senate would then use budget reconciliation rules to make several changes demanded by House Democrats. Those rules prohibit filibusters.

Exactly what the legislation would look like remained a matter of negotiation within Democratic ranks. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, "is working with his caucus, the White House and the House leadership on strategy and next steps," Reid spokesman Jim Manley said Sunday.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, renewed his party's demand that Obama and the Democrats start over and write a bipartisan health-care bill. He said that while the reconciliation process has been used to pass legislation in the past, it should not apply to health-care legislation.

"There are a number of other Republicans who do not think something of this magnitude ought to be jammed down the throats of a public that doesn't want it through this kind of device," Mr. McConnell said.

Mrs. Pelosi said that "in a matter of days" Democrats will have specific legislative language on health care to show to the public and to wavering lawmakers. She predicted voters will warm up to the bill once they understand its details.

"When we have a bill," she said, "you can bake the pie, you can sell the pie, but you have to have a pie to sell."

Mrs. Pelosi appeared on ABC's "This Week" and CNN's "State of the Union." Ms. DeParle was on NBC's "Meet the Press," while Mr. Menendez appeared on "Fox News Sunday" and Mr. McConnell spoke on CNN.

They shall cast their silver in the streets, and their gold shall be removed: their silver and their gold shall not be able to deliver them in the day of the wrath of the LORD: they shall not satisfy their souls, neither fill their bowels: because it is the stumbling block of their iniquity.

Ezekiel 7:19

Glenn Beck tries to insult our intelligence, he tries to paint us with the same broad brush as KKKer's, Neo Nazis, and Survivalist Anarchists.

He says we are extremists far to the Right, of any group in the nation. That we are a racist radical element within the Tea Party.

Beck, we are the Tea Party. We read and understand the Constitution. We respect it as the Supreme Law of the Land. We hold ourselves in obedience to this document, the whole document, just as our forefathers. We will prosecute those who break its laws and defend it against all enemies both Foreign and Domestic. Is that what has you nervous Glenn ? Are you right with the Constitution? Are you afraid you won't be able to spend your filthy money. We all will face our judgement day.

Last September 12th when I was in the crowd listening to the speakers on the Capitol steps, one of the Tea Party speakers took a moment to announce the Capitol Police had estimated the crowd at 1.5 million and still growing at 2 p.m. One officer told the speaker, it was the largest crowd he had witnessed in 20+ years of service, bigger than any inauguration, including Obama's. About the same time a news helicopter was seen overhead slowly flying a circle above the throng.

While standing in the crowd I recall overhearing two men directly in front of me discussing the crowd size.

The mainstream media will probably say the crowd is 50,000. that's O.K., next year we'll all come back with a friend.

Funny the things that stay with you.

Put me down as going back next September, but instead of just one friend, I'll be there with 4 friends. East Coast, West Coast, South Coast we're going.

Last August those around me would ask "What if after you get there, and the thing is a big flop?" "No matter" I would say "If it's just me and a dog, I'm still marching."

All of us went on faith, every one of us. We showed up at the appointed time, in the appointed place, and were repaid far beyond any expectation.

Patriots from all 50 states, were present, one citizen I learned had flown from Australia. I thanked and was thanked, for showing up. We all replied "Wouldn't have missed this for the world....America is just too important not to be here." That was why we found a way to make it. All of us would have rather spent our money on something else. We would have all rather spent our time doing something more pleasant. We chose to be there representing all Americans who still believe. We knew not everybody that wanted to be with us were present. We all had loved ones and friends that just flat couldn't be there. When I saw a man in a wheel chair wheeling himself down Pennsylvania Avenue with us, I considered how hard it must have been for him to have travelled the distance he came and the money he was sacrificing from his personal care. Parents were pushing strollers, there were elderly that had a hard time walking the 1.4 mile length of Pennsylvania Avenue but they came, and nothing was allowed to stop their being in Washington that day. Orly Taitz was there, giving ever more on top of what she has already given to her adopted country. Stories were all around me. American Patriotism, for the eye to behold,that rivaled any event in our nation's history.

Like I said, I am going back 9/12/10, six weeks before the mid term elections. Consider the statement millions and millions can make just as the country goes to the ballot box.

Now is the time to spread the word, and begin planning to attend this gathering.

The first is his endorsement of the global warming junk science, which even the global warming crowd has implicitly admitted is bunk, since they’ve changed the name to “climate change,” to adjust for the weather that has inconveniently poked holes in their claims. Remarkably–while Beck repeatedly told audiences of his syndicated radio show, his CNN Headline News show, and now his FOX News show that he did not buy into global warming nonsense–that’s not what he’s saying now:

He believes in global warming

“You’d be an idiot not to notice the temperature change,” he says. He also says there’s a legit case that global warming has, at least in part, been caused by mankind. He has tried to do his part by buying a home with a “green” design and using energy-saving products. “I’m willing to do anything but use the CFLs,” he says of compact fluorescent light bulbs. “I put them in once and couldn’t stand the way they lit up the room.”

Saturday, February 27, 2010

Three requisites, all of which must concur, for Natural Born Citizenship eligible for President of the U.S.:

1. Father must be US Citizen (either Naturalized or Natural Born)

and

2. Mother must be US Citizen (either Naturalized or Natural Born)

and

3. Must be born in US soil

Note: In Statutory Construction, the meaning of the term has to be interpreted according to the usage of the day it was used. At the time when the U.S. Constitution was drafted, everybody knew what is meant by the term “Natural Born Citizen” and they didn’t have to define it in the Constitution itself because the latter is not a dictionary but a contract with the people. Such Contract is enforceable by any citizen bound by it, and therefore any citizen has full legal standing to question the eligibility of the candidate for the President of the U.S.

"The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights."

John A. Bingham(the chief framer of the related 14th Amendment of the Constitution): "Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen."

Before I start reading this lengthy FAQ is there a brute force resolution, a Gordian knot solution to this so-called Barack Obama birth certificate controversy? Why all the fuss about his birth?

Answer:

1.Yes, there is a brute resolution.

2.This can be resolved in ten minutes if Barack Obama authorizes the release of a copy of his so-called LONG FORM (or “vault”) Certificate of Live Birth, that original document that shows where he was born, in what hospital, time and date, the attending doctor, name of parents, whose signatures appear in the document etc..

3.This is called LONG-FORM COLB for the purposes of this FAQ.

4.In all the countries in the world, it is this LONG FORM birth certificate that is the “best evidence” and the “conclusive proof” of birth.

5.In other words, the normal birth certificate that anybody presents when applying to school, for a passport, or for a school age group baseball league.

6.So far Obama has shown only the SHORT FORM (which is only an abstract and contains minimal information), which is a computer-generated “secondary” evidence that is derived out of the original source document. The legal probative value of this Short-Form is practically nil in the courts of law when the information on this document is challenged legally and the challenger demands the “best evidence” which is the LONG FORM. Of course, the original source document, the “primary evidence” document, is the LONG FORM COLB. See Wigmore’s definitive textbook on Evidence.

7.It is this refusal by Barack that is the source of this controversy. Obama must show his proof of eligibility but he doesn't have to present to every citizen in the US his own copy, if he is concerned about this privacy. At least he needs to show it, in closed door proceedings, to a competent court or authority who can legally confirm that he has legally complied with the legally required Natural Born Citizenship.

8.What’s complicating the issue is that even Barack’s Kenyan grandmother has admitting in a taped interview with an Anabaptist bishop that she witnessed the birth of Barack in Kenya, specifically in Mombasa, an island only 14 square km in size.

9.Finally, since Barack Obama was a British subject or citizen at birth, this fact alone makes Barack a non-natural born citizen, according to the constitutional experts citing law and jurisprudence.

10.Obama doesn't have to present to every citizen in the US his own copy. He only needs to show it, in closed door proceedings,to a competent court or authority who can legally confirm that he has legally complied with the legally required Natural Born Citizenship.

11.What would have happened in the old days of the United States if President George Washington were succeeded alongthe presidential line by a hypothetical son of Major-General William Howe who commanded the British forces in the Battle of Bunker Hill and a hypothetical American citizen mother? After the hundreds of thousands of lives lost in the American Revolution, do you think that the American constitution would have considered that hypothetical son a Natural Born citizen? This is a good way to portray Barack Obama II’s citizenship being born to a British father and an American mother, regardless of whether he was born in Hawaii or Kenya.

12.Until this practice was stopped in 1972, a person born outside of Hawaii could obtain a “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth”. This could have happened to Obama as well. Example is the great Chinese hero, Dr. Sun Yat-Sen who is the “Father of Modern China.” A website dedicated to him shows a copy of this Certificate of Hawaiian Birth despite having been born in China!! See Sun Yat-Sen’s Certificate here:

13.Because of the absence of Obama’s Long-Form or Vault Birth Certificate only the courts can ascertain the citizenship of Obama.

14.Scenario One: Barack was born in Kenya to a US citizen mother who was less than 19 years old and a father who was not a US citizen.

Status: Then Obama is NOT even a U.S. citizen at all, according to the law existing in 1961 his year of birth. (see full discussion below)

15.Scenario Two: Barack was born in Hawaii but his father was British anyway.

Status: Then Barack is a Citizen but NOT a Natural Born Citizen as defined by the US Constitution, law, and jurisprudence. (see full discussion below.)

16.This is a legitimate legal issue that needs to be settled once and for all by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). But instead of a trial on the merits, the courts have raised technical issues of proper standing of the plaintiffs. For the lawyers out there, be aware that so far there has been no trial on the merits regarding Obama’s citizenship. If a citizen has no standing to protect the Constitution, then who has?

Question 2:

Barack Obama is on the ballot of every state. Certainly, this means that he filed his candidacy and made allegations in his candidacy in all these states that he is a natural born citizen. And certainly, the government agencies involved did not merely take him at his word but required his proof of natural born citizenship. Certainly, all these applications in each state have attachments proving the same. How old is he? Is he at least 35? Was he born of US parents on US soil? All these information are understood to have been given to all the government agencies who accepted his candidacy. So how come citizens are challenging Barack’s qualifications? Isn’t this the job of the government agencies to challenge the allegations of all candidates?

Answer:

This can only happen in the movies.

Incredibly, the answer is that all government officials and agencies have been gullible enough to accept everything written by any candidate without requiring proof.

Even a person like Roger Calero who is obviously, in plain sight, is not Natural Born (he was born in Nicaragua) managed to get his name on the ballots of five states. Incredible!

And now, that many citizens have been challenging Obama to prove his natural born citizenship, the government officials refused to do so on their own initiative, and even made representations in the court cases that they are not supposed to do it.

(The officials do not want to admit that they did not do their jobs of verifying Obama’s claim that he is a Natural Born Citizen! They could be in jail for malfeasance, misfeasance, or nonfeasance.)

This is a huge embarrassment for the most powerful nation in the world. That we are victims of a failure of the entire government machinery to verify statements made by candidates.

It’s a case of “somebody should have checked whether Obama’s claim to natural born citizenship is true but look, it’s not me who should be doing it” syndrome.

Thanks obamareleaseyourrecords

(ACTION ALERT AT BOTTOM) Some are in high gear to put an end to the Constitutional Eligibility movement, using Alinsky tactics. And it's not coming from the left.

Here's a snippet from Politico;(2/27/10)'Conservatives target their own fringe' - After months of struggling to harness the energy of newly engaged tea party activists, the conservative establishment — with critical midterm congressional elections on the horizon — is taking aim for the first time at the movement’s extremist elements.

“I don’t believe we should be giving [extremists] a platform or empowering them to do anything based off their conspiracy theories,” said Ned Ryun, president of American Majority... More labeling & disinformation HERE.

Here's a snippet from the Washington Post;(2/19/10)'A primer on political reality' - But the birthers and Birchers, militias and nativists, racists and conspiracy theorists do exist. Some, having waited decades in deserved obscurity, hope to ride a populist movement like remoras. But there are others, new to political engagement, who have found paranoia and anger intoxicating. They watch Glenn Beck rail against the omnipresent threat of Saul Alinsky, read Ayn Rand's elevation of egotism and contempt for the weak, listen to Ron Paul attacking the Federal Reserve cabal, and suddenly their resentments become ordered into a theory. Such theories, in politics, can act like a drug, causing addiction, euphoria and psychedelic departures from reality."... [That would make Hitler proud! The rest of that garbage can be viewed HERE.

Snippets from Ned Ryun, president of American Majority; (2/12/10)'On Birfers and Truthers,' - "I see that Erick Erickson of RedState has made it clear that RedState is not the place for birfers or truthers. Neither is American Majority. I second Erick’s comments that birfers and truthers have no place among us, nor do they have a place in the tea party movement... ...more HERE.

(2/15/10)'On Birfers and Truthers, Part II' - "I’m taking this week to make it clear that American Majority does not encourage birfers or truthers, nor are they welcome at American Majority...

...So the birfers and truthers can take their little conspiracies and start their own little organizations and movements and see how far it gets them. Which will be nowhere."... ...rest HERE.

Snippets from Erick Erickson of RedState; (2/12/10)'Vigilance: I’m Banning Birfers, Truthers, and Groups Affiliated Therewith' - "Today I want to reaffirm and make it more definitive. If you think 9/11 was an inside job or you really want to debate whether or not Barack Obama is an American citizen eligible to be President, RedState is not a place for you......Birfers and Truthers are not welcome here. Period. End of Story." [then he continues on HERE even though it says End of Story. He ends it with this; "Birfers and Truthers have no place among us. And they are most decidedly not welcome at RedState."...

You should really pay attention and see what happens when you attack and ridicule your own supporters.

Ned Ryun, and whoever else, pay attention; I'm not a "truther" nor a "birther" or any other conspiracy theory fringe person. I'm an American and a proud conservative that loves this country and what she stands for. I understand the Jihadi threat we and the world face. To equate the two is asinine and shows the lack of understanding or outright treason on the part of some.

Mr. Ryun & Erick Erickson, who are you to tell others they have no place in the tea party movement? The Tea Party is made up of WE THE PEOPLE, not a small group of political party insiders. And to call it a "judicial coup" also shows the lack of understanding of this issue, the lawsuits, quo warrantos and the Constitution.

It's as simple as this; it is no conspiracy theory that Obama is fighting the release of all his past records, with lawyers paid with our tax dollars. It is no conspiracy theory that Obama's father was never a U.S. Citizen.

We know from several SCOTUS rulings that "all children born in the country of parents who were its citizens... " make up the “natural born Citizen” category. The SCOTUS says that there have never been any doubts as to the status of these children. As to children born in the U.S. to parents who were not U.S. citizens at the time of their birth, there have been doubts. In other words, "natural born Citizen" under this formulation requires two generations of U.S. citizens, one generation in the parents and the other in the child himself/herself who also must be born on U.S. soil.

It is important to understand that we are focusing on what is a "natural born Citizen" under Article II which specifies the requirements to be President and not on what a "Citizen" is under the 14th Amendment or under some Congressional Act which does not relate to Article II of our Constitution regarding natural born Citizenship.

Obama, while having his mother's U.S. citizenship generation, is missing that of his father's, for his father was a British subject/citizen at the time of Obama's birth. He therefore cannot be a "natural born Citizen," even if Obama was born in Hawaii.

Unless Obama is 200+ years old he is not Constitutionally Eligible to be POTUS.

Thanks LAME CHERRYI was reading a weekly talk radio rundown by Kathy Shaidle and a bit of Inspiration sparked as the Glenn Beck situation fell into place with most talk radio types wondering just like they are about Democrats on this suicide vote for Obamacrypt in what they are doing really.

This blog was first to warn readers that Glenn Beck was a fraud, a parrot like Shep Smith and the nuance of fair and balanced at FOX who are Obamites and simply like Noel Sheppard, and, honestly Keith Olbermann who are paid to herd the volatile masses for mass profits in this constant cartel game of stirring up American and pitting them against each other so an Obama can install Marxist policies.

I noted in tracking Barack Obama that he is a proven mole of the Muslim oil mafia in first taking funds from the Islamofascists via black revolutionaries to gain admission to Harvard and later taking direct funding from Saddam Hussein Islamocommunists in their bag man Nahdmi Auchi and his wife for his senate bid and Georgian mansion.Mr. Obama was part of the communist sodomite clique of Chicago in Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers in being his control, the Alinsky manifesto and his current control in "watcher" Val-erie Jarrett holds the name still of Vernon Jarrett who was the celebrated and eulogized communist organizer in Chicago.

This blog pointed out the well known proven fact that Jesse Jackson was an FBI operative who for years was in place to keep the "Jeremiah Wright" black revolutionary group from becoming a Charlie Manson revolution via the Black Panthers which Bill Ayers was monitoring too, before he blew up his own terrorists who were about to detonate a bomb on the US military at Obama's sometime school of Columbia University.

Mr. Obama chose the Chicago road to gain access to this clique and married Michelle Robinson for that very purpose of the black vote. His entire purpose in 2007 was to bring in the black vote for a retiring and ineffective Jesse Jackson, but in 2008 when the Clinton's were on the punish list of the European cartel for Bill selling Asian uranium to China, Mr. Obama was they humiliation candidate to teach the Clinton's a lesson.This is the meteoric rise of Barack Hussein Obama.

In this the globalist cartel has placed many shills to spew propaganda in choosing complete unknowns like washed up sports announcer Keith Olbermann and washed up comic Al Franken to give the left something to rally behind.The meteoric rise of Glenn Beck was the same fraud. He simply uttered Obama was a racist in a culture of Clinton which it was well documented by this blog no one was laying any glove leather on Obama in the media, which in turn revealed what frauds and shills the major media are in being leftists leading the right on cue.Peggy Noonan being the perfect example to Noel Sheppard and Matthew Sheffield at Newsbusters calling people who questioned Obama's motives as "suffering from Obama derangement syndrome".

Glenn Beck is such a persona of the global elite. He gives an interview about being a kindred soul of George Clooney, finds Mormonism a warm and fuzzy religion for little girls, is convinced of global warming, trashed Ronald Reagan and then states he can't remember saying all of that.He is caught on mic at CPAC in saying the Republicans are as bad as the Democrats.

All of this caused a justified outcry, but as Kathy Shaidle only noted in her blog, Rush Limbaugh was the one who had his finger on this in hinting exactly what Beck was up to.Glenn Beck is part of an effort to create a 3rd party to ruin the Republicans, so a grinning David Brooks Obamite can have Obama elected to a landslide 3rd term.

Glenn Beck is part of this same fractionalizing group of moles who are in place like Bob Barr to keep the Reagan coalition from forming again. This same group led by Democratic operatives in crossing over and voting in GOP elections (Note that this blog called for reforms in states so that people could not vote in other party's primaries, but Michael Steele and the GOP have not moved an ounce to stop this, nor has the DNC. The chaos of vote crossover keeps American candidates from being elected. What one gets then is a John McCain and Barack Hussein Obama which neither party really desired.) is what caused the disaster of 2008.

Beck as Mr. Limbaugh notes is heading this as part of his payback for his 30 pieces of silver.

Glenn Beck is literally part of this Molotov Mob which goes around throwing out incendiary rhetoric for their profit and position, with the caveat in their contract they are there to do a Peggy Noonan in betraying their party at the opportune moment so a globalist mole like Obama will be elected.Note Noonan after the disaster tried to sound "conservative" again, but was typing more like a drunken keyboard operator. The same is true for most of these moles, except Shep Smith who has drunken so much Obama green kool aid that he whines like Bo the Obama dog.

This is who Glenn Beck is, a signed up stooge meant to lead the masses enough to a 3rd party. This is what Baldy Schmidt was up to in trying to ruin Gov. Sarah Palin from inside the McCain camp. Schmidt is like Beck in being a patrician mole answering to the power elite.There are always the Ron Paul followers who when shown that Paul votes 20% to 50% as a liberal according to actual votes, who will still believe the kool aid and follow a Glenn Beck in making excuses for him.

Glenn Beck is part of this national socialist movement which is exactly the policy the Nazi's were up to in Germany. He is a 5th column agent provocateur. He is by Obama in government control taking over American finance, industry and health care, an Obamanazi.He is their operative to promote a fracturing of the GOP so Democrats can diffuse the Tea Party movement long enough so Obama can infuse 40 million Mexican illegals into the Democratic voting block. That is why Democrats are not committing suicide in Obama votes. They have this planned out to make 40 million illegals American voters to give them a landslide in 2010 and 2012.Glenn Beck is the lead in this to fracture the American right in part or all in whether it is 3% or 50% of the vote in a 3rd party to re elect the Marxists of Obama in his hybrid party of black revolutionaries out of South America, Marxists of Africa, Muslim oil mafia, Islamocommunists, Islamofacsists, National Socialists and Communist Bolsheviks with a touch of his favorite system on earth, Maoist Chinese.

Glenn Beck is a Pravda past and Joseph Goebbels future for America. It is quite repulsive in someone being paid for sedition in America and treacherous to accept money to say things to manipulate people according to Tavistock doctrines.

In closing, I would point out that Hal Turner was outed not that long ago in being an FBI operative in order to keep an eye on and manipulate the white racist movement. Hal Turner is not the only operative in these operations.This is a widespread manifestation and in all of this it looks like Glenn Beck is such a stooge like Jesse Jackson to keep a hand on that group who are pro American and are about to reignite the Reagan Revolution.

Having had no luck in United States courts getting President Barack Obama thrown out of office because he was born outside the United States, alpha birther Orly Taitz is applying to the United Nations for “urgent action under the mandate for human rights defenders.”

Dr. Sam Vaknin is a world authority on narcissism. Vaknin says that Obama's language, posture and demeanor, and the testimonies of his closest, dearest and nearest suggest that the Senator is either a narcissist or he may have narcissistic personality disorder.

Pathological narcissism is a pattern of thinking and behaving in adolescence and adulthood, which involves infatuation and obsession with one's self to the exclusion of others. It manifests in the chronic pursuit of personal gratification and attention (narcissistic supply), in social dominance and personal ambition, bragging, insensitivity to others, lack of empathy and/or excessive dependence on others to meet his/her responsibilities in daily living and thinking.

“If I had to name my greatest strength, I guess it would be my humility.Greatest weakness? It’s possible that I’m a little too awesome.” - Barack Obama

by DefendUSxFebruary 27, 2010 LOL .. so, the original birth cert burned in a fire aye? .. so, what we get is an "electronic" (don't you really mean PHOTOSHOP image) record of "Certification of Live Birth" .. which are given to foreigners anyway.

From Blogsphere:

Fact is Obama never even got a "Cerftication of Live Birth" from HI. Here is how it all went down:

1) Public became suspicious on Obama eligibilty2) DailyKOS blogger does a search for a HI Birth Certificate3) One of the first results returned from a image search was used as a model4) The Blogger didn't realize (nor did Obama) that the cert found in the image search was a "certfication of Live Birth" and not an actual HI birth certificate5) A background template was used to create the "certification of live birth" in Photoshop6) It was submitted to Obama and his staff and then placed on "Fight the Smears"7) Blogger later admits to doing it but then his blog at DailyKOS is stopped and no one hears from him about the issue again8) Public finds all kinds of problems with Photoshop image (including a glaring mistake putting the race as "African") 9) In an attempt to "fill in" what was missing from the original, two other versions were created. The first contained the Registrar Seal (which the public originally found missing as well).10) The second version didn't "hold up", as it was still missing a Registrar Signature and "creases"11) Third and final version contains new signature and creases (after being printed), but the signature cannot be seen up close enough. The public is asked to take Obama-affiliated "Fact Check's" word for it12) Obama campaign decides to not use or reference the photoshop image any longer as it has become laughable13) New approach is to site birth announcements in HI Newspaper, though the only thing showing this is, yet again, another Photoshop image jobby14) HI Advertiser receives major government funding and is owned by "prominent Democrat"15) Finally, redicule the movement as "fringe" through the Obamamedia16) Attorney General won't "confirm" that Obama has legitimate birth records with the state

One of the more bizarre rows in American politics has resurfaced as the country prepares for crucial mid-term elections this year.

The so-called 'birthers' movement, which questions whether Barack Obama was born in the US and is therefore a legitimate president, has cropped up on the campaign.

A representative in Arizona's state senate has even introduced a 'birth certificate bill' because she says constituents are so worried.

The White House has consistently dismissed the issue. Authorities in Hawaii have provided an electronic record of Obama's birth because the paper copy was destroyed in a fire which wiped out much of the state's archives.

But J D Hayworth, who is running against former presidential candidate John McCain in the race to be Arizona Senator, questioned Obama's credentials on a radio show.

McCain, who lost out to Obama in 2008, criticised Hayworth for giving oxygen to the 'birther' debate.

And supporters at one of Hayworth's rallies openly questioned the president's right to be in office.

Alan Becker said: "If it was in question and someone questioned me about my birth certificate I would give it to them and say 'Here it is'.

"Why can't he do that?

Jimmy Carter: 'Claims racist'

Democrats in Arizona have dismissed the bill, introduced by Representative Judy Burges.

Kyrsten Sinema said: "This bill is what I would call patently ridiculous and offensive.

"The truth is that he was born in the United States and has provided that proof time and time again."

The 'birthers' are perhaps the most bizarre of the protest movements against the president.

Genuine concerns in the US are often being drowned out by more extreme voices.

Former president Jimmy Carter has suggested that much of the opposition to Barack Obama is based on his race.

But Hayworth, who says the Obama issue is now settled, believes questions remain.

He said: "We require voters to demonstrate they are who they say they are, I think everyone on the ballot should do that."

The readers of The Conservative Monster were a big part of teaching Beck a badly needed lesson and we hit him where it hurts, IN HIS RATINGS.Beck went from 3.7 million viewers on Jan. 20th, 2010 to just 2.4 million viewers on Feb. 24th, 2010. This is a HUGE MESSAGE that WE sent to this FRAUD.

I organized thousands of people to flood Beck's phone lines, demanding that he end his suppression of the Obama Eligibility crisis, issue and pending lawsuits. Instead of being a patriot, he acted like a LEFTIST. Beck used Saul Alinsky tactics against his own fans and this is punishment.

Pastor Manning was also a tremendous help in the success of Operation Flood It along with the thousands of people on my Facebook page. This was a team effort of patriots that are fed up with the lies coming from the media on the biggest eligibility crisis that this country has ever faced.

Why has Obama employed a legion of private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

I was asked to research this by a patriot friend, someone who has served their country for many years. I could not refuse.

I like Glenn Beck. I wish that he would practice what he preaches. I diligently have tried to practice what I preach and have avoided criticizing those taking a different approach to the Obama eligibility question. I want Glenn to shut his mouth for a moment and listen. Glenn, if you are listening or reading. I will be glad to meet with you. In private if you wish.

Glenn Beck, if you had simply chosen to avoid the Obama eligibility questions it would have been cowardly, irresponsible journalism and an affront to the US Constitution. But when you opened your ill informed mouth and attacked concerned Americans, repeatedly, for asking questions and exercising their First Amendment rights, you crossed way over the line.

Is our protest against Glenn Beck Hypocrisy working? Beck loves to use graphs so I have prepared one for the last six weeks of Neilson ratings for the Fox Glenn Beck show.

McCain vs. Hayworth: No Contest for ConservativesFebruary 27th, 2010In his Pajamas Media piece “Please, No More ‘Half-as-Much’ Republicans,” J. Robert Smith states that swapping out John McCain for J.D. Hayworth in the upcoming GOP senatorial primary in Arizona is a “nice bargain from a conservative’s viewpoint.”

It would certainly be that, and an analysis of the voting records of these two men from the Grand Canyon State via vote ratings from the American Conservative Union (ACU), National Journal, and the Americans for Democratic Action (ADA) highlights just how good a bargain it would be.

Looking first at the ACU numbers, we see that Hayworth’s ACU lifetime rating of 98 is significantly higher than John McCain’s lifetime ACU average of 81. In fact, in John McCain’s 22 years in the Senate prior to last year, he was only able to equal or surpass Hayworth’s low-water mark of 88 (in ’03) three times (’94, ’95, and ‘96). What’s more, with the exception of 2003, Hayworth voted with the ACU position at least 96 percent of the time every year he was in Congress — a feat that John McCain has only achieved once.

With respect to National Journal’s ratings, Hayworth’s average score for the 12 years he served in the House was 22 points higher than John McCain’s average rating over this same period (National Journal ratings are only available for McCain for this 12 year period, as he did not vote enough in ’07 or ’08 to receive a rating and scores are not available prior to ’95). To put this in perspective, this gap is greater than the 21-point margin in 2008 between Senators Sam Brownback and Arlen Specter. Additionally, just as it was with the ACU data, Hayworth’s least conservative year fairs very well against McCain’s average year. In fact, Hayworth’s least conservative score (78) is higher than any score John McCain has received from National Journal since 1995.

As for the ADA ratings, they too show that Hayworth is clearly the most conservative choice to represent Arizonans alongside Jon Kyl in the U.S. Senate. According to ADA statistics, McCain and Hayworth have voted against the liberal ADA position 85 and 96 percent of the time, respectively, over the course of their congressional careers.

However, as clear as this data shows the difference between these two men to be, the ideological gap between them is actually even greater, as the above analysis does not take into account that there are really two John McCains — the McCain of the late 80s and most of the 90s, and the oft-yielding maverick Republican that we have known since.

From 1987 when John McCain first entered the Senate through 1997 his average ACU rating was a respectably conservative 88, but from 1998 through 2008 his average score fell to a less than stellar 73. To put this in perspective, only four current Republican senators have a lifetime rating that is less conservative than McCain’s average rating over this latter period (Snowe – ME, Collins – ME, Voinovich – OH, and Murkowski – AK). And the clear distinction between these two periods is such that McCain’s least conservative result prior to 1998 of 80 has only been surpassed once since (an 81 in 2000).

John McCain’s penchant for spending time on the other side of the aisle in the last decade is also evidenced by the voting statistics from National Journal and the ADA. The average ratings received by John McCain from these two groups were 10 and 12 points less conservative, respectively, for the period since 1998 than they were for the period prior. In fact, since 2000 only six current Republican senators have received a National Journal rating for any given year that is less conservative than the average score of 62 that McCain has received since 1998. What’s more, since 2001, McCain has, on average, ranked as the 9th least conservative Republican in the Senate according to National Journal’s ratings. Contrast this with Hayworth, who in his 12 years in Congress ranked, on average, as the 46th most conservative member of the House — putting him solidly amongst the top third of Republican representatives during this period.

So as you can see, Hayworth is right when he states that “Arizona Republicans will have a clear choice in the August 24 primary.” On the one hand, they can choose John McCain’s unique brand of hit-n-miss conservatism, and on the other they can choose someone who actually is — at least as Washington Republicans go — a true conservative.

But regardless of the outcome, one thing is for certain: Conservatives across the country will be crossing their fingers in August in hopes that Arizona Republicans will get it right, because we could definitely stand to have fewer “half-as-much Republicans.”

Energy Secretary Steven Chu didn't reach the pinnacle of his profession by treading the well-worn path of modern group-think. It's regrettable that the Nobel Prize-winning physicist is stuck in that rut now.

Mr. Chu took great pains in a Feb. 19 speech to a Denver energy summit in arguing the case for human-induced climate change. "We have to convince all of America that this is a nonpartisan issue. ... This is our economic future," he said.

You have to feel for a man of science trying to make the jump to politics. In science, facts speak for themselves. In politics, facts are often run to ground by baloney. As energy secretary, Mr. Chu has traded fact for fiction and now spends his days selling President Obama's discredited climate-change policy.

Surely, Mr. Chu must be aware that the case for human-induced climate change, the cause that he has embraced as the paramount mission of his secretariat, has been exposed as fraught with fraud. Two weeks ago, Yvo de Boer, the United Nations' pre-eminent climate-change official, announced his resignation amid a groundswell of derision over his failure to confront the global-warming hoax. Evidence of falsified data, errors in the U.N.'s own Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report and biased ground-based temperature data are all part of the body of bogus science that has become known as Climategate.

On Wednesday, when Mr. Chu toured the site of Abu Dhabi's Masdar City - touted as "the world's first carbon-neutral, zero-waste city" - he felt compelled to voice climate-change-equals-jobs rhetoric similar to that which he delivered in Denver. When completed, the sparkling 6-square-kilometer model city will be equipped with the world's priciest energy technologies, including solar, hydrogen and geothermal power plants - energy toys that a few opulent oil sheiks can afford to play with, but a country the size of America cannot. What he saw there will not be "our economic future," at least not anytime soon.

Mr. Chu's official government biography crows that he has "devoted his recent scientific career to the search for new solutions to our energy challenges and stopping global climate change - a mission he continues with even greater urgency as secretary of energy."

The Cabinet secretary could learn from the example of the wise Viking King Canute. Legend has it that when His Majesty learned that his flattering courtiers were claiming he was "so great, he could command the tides of the sea to go back," he had his throne carried to the seashore. When the tide rose, he commanded the waves to halt. When his command had no effect, he pointed out to all that though the deeds of kings might appear great to men, they were nothing compared to the forces of nature.

Likewise, the energy secretary would be smart to apprehend the limits of his power. Climate will change - or cease changing - but not by his leave. The real challenge of helping Americans develop clean, affordable and plentiful energy sources should be enough to occupy his days in office.

Every day efforts intensify to intimidate or discourage Americans who rightly insist that Barack Obama properly document his constitutional eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States. It has even spilled into the political arena. In Arizona John McCain apparently believes that the mad stream media’s scurrilous slanders against such constitutionalists have succeeded. His campaign is airing commercials identifying J. D. Hayworth as such a constitutionalist, as if that alone is sufficient to turn all right thinking Arizonans against him.

(Feb. 26, 2010) — In response to the public outcry over my last report regarding Okubo’s apparently false response to my request for index data from the Hawaii Birth Index, Miss Janice Okubo has directed staff at the Hawaii Department of Health to release a pdf file containing what appears to be scans of a computer printout containing redacted pages from the Hawaii Birth Index for those sections, which would contain the surnames Payne, Dunham, Soetoro and Obama.

OBAMA'S FOREIGN POLICY IS NO DIFFERENT THAN HIS HANDLNG OF OBAMACARE: IT'S A DISASTER

The Bush administration got a lot of things wrong – but at least they usually had some idea of who America’s adversaries were and who America’s friends were. For example, Bush’s policy of maintaining the special relationship with Britain was a simple recognition of the close bonds of alliance, friendship and interests that the British and Americans have had since World War I.

In contrast, Obama and his Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are apparently clueless about some of the most basic aspects of foreign policy: supporting one’s friends and fencing in one’s adversaries.

The declaration of neutrality on the issue of the sovereignty of the Falklands issued by the US State Department is clear proof of the uselessness of the Obama administration.

...this mess is just typical of the drift in US foreign policy – if one can say that it even HAS a coherent foreign policy these days.

As I said, at the core of the problem is a simple inability to recognise and support our friends over adversaries. In his first year in office Obama made numerous apologies for America’s past to the Third World, he effusively greeted the Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez, he bowed low to the Saudi ruler, and called for a “reset” of relations with Russia – all the while implying that America was at fault for all these problems.

At the same time he rudely undermined the security of America’s Eastern European allies by cancelling the ballistic missile defence with no notice and no prior discussion, he failed to push for a free trade agreement with Colombia – America’s strongest ally in South America – and he supported Chavez’s allies when they tried (luckily unsuccessfully) to unseat a democratic and pro-US government in Honduras.

...On assuming office, Obama’s vision of foreign policy was simple: he would repudiate past American policies and the whole world would melt before the president’s charm.

The administration somehow thought that we really didn’t have enemies with agendas completely hostile to our own – there were just countries that had become offended by US actions and they would happily cooperate with America as soon as the evil Republicans were gone.

AMERICA'S NUMBER ONE ENEMY

Are you willing to continue the fight for freedom for our Posterity?

As people who believe in the principles and philosophies of the United States Constitution, we number in the majority. As folks that dare to consider standing against the tyranny being perpetrated by the Obama administration, we are in the majority across this great country. But the clock is ticking. Will we continue to entertain the idea that sitting on the couch complaining as we watch the news on television is an effective strategy, or are we ready to take action, and do more than rally at Tea Party events, or occasionally write an email to our representatives? Are we ready to do more than complain? Are we willing to, as the signers of the Declaration of Independence stated in the last sentence of the document, put on the line our “Lives, Fortunes, and sacred Honor?”

SUPPORT LAW ENFORCEMENT

Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.

The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. - E. Vattel

JUST HOW DEVIOUS AND CORRUPT IS OBAMA AND HIS BAND OF MISCREANTS, PERVERTS AND LIARS?

Keeping Track of Obama Lies, Broken Promises

By Peter Andrew – ConservativeAmerican.org – Leading the way Right.

“President Obama is himself a broken promise. The love affair Americans had with the idea of the beautiful racial harmony we would get if we elected a half-black man to the White House has been ruined by the reality that President Obama means nothing that he says and intends to keep none of his promises.” – David Kraemer, ConservativeAmerican.org

The list below contains all of the Obama Administration mistakes, blunders, broken promises, flip flops, gaffes, lies, etc. That’s too long of a name, so we called it “the Official Obama Administration Scandals List.” This list covers Barack Obama and his pals from day one through September 4th, 2011. At that point, the list was discontinued. However, you can see information on more recent scandals on our NEW Obama Scandals List by clicking here! We present this list to you as an accurate and complete historic detail of the Legacy of Lies President Obama leaves behind for the time period starting with his youth and going until September 4th, 2011. Not responsible for any broken or out-of-date links. They worked when we posted them. Some may redirect you to the wayback machine.

You can visit all the pages of the Official Obama Administration Scandals List!

WAKE-UP AMERICA!

BIRTHER REPORT LINK

LINK TO POST & EMAIL

Latest news re: Obama Corruption & Fraud

WHERE'S OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE LINK:

IMPEACH THE USURPER

The case for impeaching Barack Hussein Obama

We the People of the United States

Pending an acceptable outcome of the vitally-important 2014 election—which affords the opportunity to elect a Congress that is willing to initiate impeachment proceedings against Barack Hussein Obama, and thereby stop, or even remove from office, this fraudulent usurper and his inner circle of collaborators—We the People of the United States of America affirm our allegiance to the timeless principles upon which our nation was founded, as set forth in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States, and upon the foundation of those principles, declare the causes which impel us to seek this despotic president's impeachment and removal.

We hereby allege that the history of the current President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over the American people. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world—

ARTICLE 1—Contempt for the Constitution

Mr. Obama has engaged, throughout his despotic tenure as president, in rule by edict and executive decree, bypassing Congress, and thus the will of the people, to enforce policies entirely of his own creation. Ignoring the federal government's foundation of a separation of powers, he has routinely violated duly enacted statutes of the Legislature, as well as defied the Courts, in pursuit of ultimate supremacy over the United States of America. In so doing, he has exhibited an unmistakable pattern of contempt for the U.S. Constitution, which prior to his ruinous tenure had served two centuries as the Law of the Land.

We therefore demand that this criminal, treasonous individual be removed from office without delay and held accountable for his destructive behavior, and that all his unlawful acts as president be considered of no effect or validity. We believe that the only effective way to achieve this urgent goal is to initiate impeachment.

ARTICLE 2—False pretenses

Mr. Obama has attained the office of president in a verifiably fraudulent and criminal manner, and upon a false identity and false pretenses.

We therefore demand immediate release of all currently sealed documentation of who he is; what his true history entails; what his earlier school, travel, and other records reveal about him; what his original (not photocopied) birth certificate makes clear; and all other relevant information in the public record now suppressed or intentionally falsified regarding him. We the People of the United States have a right to know such things about a man who currently serves as Commander-in-Chief of our nation's armed forces and oversees the entire Executive Branch of the U.S. government. We believe that the only effective way to force release of these records is impeachment.

ARTICLE 3—Criminal fraud

Upon taking office, Mr. Obama criminally defrauded Congress and the American people with false promises, uttered repeatedly in the public record about the nature, scope, and effect of his signature legislative achievement, "Obamacare," in a deceptive effort to gain passage of this catastrophic measure, which authorizes a sweeping federal takeover of America's healthcare industry.

We therefore demand that this healthcare travesty be immediately revoked, defunded, and declared null and void, and that this president be held accountable for intentionally misleading and defrauding the citizenry by means of this insidious scheme—a scheme that has already diminished the rightful choice of most Americans regarding their healthcare, has caused millions to lose their jobs due to its workplace requirements, and will cost our nation its material viability and vitality if allowed to go forward. We believe that the only effective way to ensure the dismantling of Obamacare is impeachment.

ARTICLE 4—Deliberate bankrupting of the U.S.

In a deliberate scheme to force the financial collapse of the United States, Mr. Obama and his collaborators have pushed the nation's "public debt"—that is, the difference between public spending and public receipts—to an unsustainable 17 TRILLION dollars, an amount exceeding our nation's Gross Domestic Product (or total value of goods and services) and more than doubling the debt's previous rate of growth. The effect is to impose an indebtedness of over $50,000 upon every man, woman, and child in the U.S., and more than $150,000 per taxpayer, numbers that indicate the U.S. is headed toward insolvency and our posterity will be forced to bear the dire consequences. The effect is even more dire when "unfunded liabilities" are factored in.

We therefore demand that the individual behind this destructive scheme assume all liability, upon his own person, for the amount the national debt has increased during his tenure, in company with all others who have collaborated with him in the Executive and Legislative Branches of the federal government in enacting this policy, listing them by name, and that the American people at large be absolved—by binding decree—of any and all liability for such wanton abuse of the public purse. We believe that the only effective way to attain such simple, reasonable justice is impeachment.

ARTICLE 5—Treasonous national security policy

By insidious design and outright treachery, Mr. Obama has dangerously weakened America's national security—through his emasculation of our military; his unilateral reduction of our missile defense system, thereby weakening American military superiority and inviting nuclear conflagration at home and abroad; his deceitful promotion and arming of radical Islamic interests in Egypt, Libya, Syria, and elsewhere; his catering, in domestic and foreign policy, to the Muslim Brotherhood, which is on record seeking the destruction of the United States; his fraudulent relations with Iran that will likely ensure this radically hostile nation succeeds in developing nuclear weapons; his continuing disregard for the vital interests of longtime American ally Israel; his unreasonable handicapping of our military's rules of engagement, dangerously favoring America's enemies; his alarming pattern of dismissing high-ranking military officers for groundless or superficial reasons; and similar anti-American policies and actions too numerous to mention.

We therefore demand that the Obama administration be forced immediately to cease and desist from its treasonous, unconstitutional, conspiratorial plot to take down America, and our allies with it, and that a sane, pro-American policy be adopted in its place for the purpose of protecting our nation from all threats to its continuance. We believe that the only effective way to enforce this urgent demand is impeachment.

ARTICLE 6—Treasonous cover-up of Benghazi

Mr. Obama has deceitfully sought to cover up his administration's involvement in a covert operation in Benghazi, Libya, that ran afoul September 11, 2012. The president's fabricated narrative of the causes and nature of the episode, which resulted in the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans, has been shown to be a cynical attempt to divert attention from what actually happened, including reports of treasonable administration dealings with terrorist insurgents in Syria. The administration's interference with investigations by Congress into the matter, and its the muzzling of witnesses and participants, hints that only the tip of the iceberg has yet been revealed regarding Mr. Obama's contemptuous behavior and dereliction of duty in this bloodstained scandal.

We therefore demand that all witnesses who have firsthand knowledge of the truth regarding the Benghazi fiasco be permitted to come forth without threat of retaliation and give their account of any and all relevant facts—including mounting evidence of Obama administration sympathy for Islamic terrorist organizations. We believe that the only effective way to ensure such unsuppressed testimony is impeachment.

ARTICLE 7—Plot to disarm the citizenry

Mr. Obama has repeatedly attempted to take advantage of isolated acts of violence in our nation involving firearms in the hands of deranged individuals to deprive law-abiding Americans of their constitutionally-guaranteed right to keep and bear arms, in a direct assault on the Second Amendment by someone who himself poses a growing threat to the security and well-being of our nation; and he has repeatedly made known his intention to succeed with his unconstitutional goal of disarming the people despite any setbacks he may encounter in Congress. So intent is he on imposing gun control that he even engaged in a deadly gunrunning hoax known as "Fast and Furious" to incite sympathy for tightening U.S. gun laws, then invoked executive privilege to cover up his administration's criminal involvement. He and his administration have also withheld or destroyed vital physical evidence that would corroborate events at Newtown, CT, in which 20 schoolchildren and six adults were reportedly killed by a disturbed gunman with an assault rifle—an incident the president has shamelessly exploited in his push for oppressive new gun legislation.

We therefore demand that the president immediately abandon such pursuit of tyranny and seek refuge in a nation more to his liking, one that already bans, or severely restricts, gun ownership by law-abiding citizens in consequence of despotic notions of governance. We believe that the only way to hasten this outcome is impeachment.

ARTICLE 8—Undermining U.S. border security

Similarly, Mr. Obama has repeatedly sought to undermine U.S. border security, and by extension America's very independence, by pushing misnamed "immigration reform" that would in reality open wide our borders, overburden the public coffers, and grant amnesty to the many millions of unlawful occupiers who have entered the country by stealth. Unable to achieve this agenda lawfully, through Congress, he has undertaken to achieve it dictatorially, in open violation of the Constitution and statutory immigration law. Ostensibly, the president intends, by his abandonment of longstanding U.S. immigration policy, to create a permanent under-culture of dependent immigrants who have little allegiance to America's founding ideals, upon whom to stand to remain in power indefinitely—either by himself, or in the person of likeminded schemers within his party.

We therefore demand that our nation's borders be made effectively secure, that existing immigration laws be reasonably and fairly enforced, that all persons seeking citizenship play fundamentally by the same rules, no matter the petitioners' origins, and that Mr. Obama's immigration policy and initiatives be rejected by Congress as the threat they are to our nation's security and strength, with his deceptive drive for "immigration reform" relegated permanently to the backwaters of history. We believe that the only way to ensure this outcome is impeachment.

ARTICLE 9—Engaging in mass surveillance

Mr. Obama has engaged in notorious overreach regarding domestic surveillance. A certain degree of targeted domestic surveillance may be considered justified, even essential, to protect American citizens from harm if conducted with appropriate oversight and in harmony with reasonable law—but indiscriminate spying on all citizens is indefensible and constitutes the very essence of a police state.

We therefore demand that the routine eavesdropping now being conducted by the National Security Agency (NSA) be curtailed to conform with appropriate safeguards, to permit only those functions that can be constitutionally defended. We believe that the only way to leverage this outcome is impeachment.

ARTICLE 10—Abusing IRS authority

Likewise, Mr. Obama and his IRS subordinates have notoriously abused the public trust by singling out, and arbitrarily penalizing, patriotic organizations awaiting approval of tax-exempt status so they might fundraise legally. By delaying approvals and sharing confidential information with potential adversaries, for purely political reasons, the Obama administration has violated federal statutes, and unlawfully handicapped these groups in their efforts to counter Mr. Obama's tyranny.

We therefore demand substantial monetary damages for these aggrieved organizations, and expedited approval of all "Tea Party," "conservative," and "libertarian" groups in the future. More to the point, because of its unavoidably political nature, we seek abolition of the IRS itself, and its replacement by a reasonable consumption or flat tax. We believe that the only way to bring about such an outcome is impeachment.

ARTICLE 11—Subverting America's morality

Most far-reaching and adverse of all his insidious deeds, in the acknowledged biblical perspective of our Creator, is that Mr. Obama has undertaken to subvert America's moral strength and means of perpetuation by promoting measures that weaken the natural, God-ordained family, and escalate the unthinkable aborting of America's posterity. As part of this corrupt effort, he has sanctioned the unconstitutional silencing of conscientious citizens and clergy who oppose homosexuality and its growing inclusion in lawful marriage; and he has approved stipulations in his healthcare plan that would force Americans opposed to abortion, or to anything related involving abortifacients or contraceptives, to directly fund such morally-offensive practices. These immoral, destructive policies—integral to the president's sweeping plan to transform America—militate not only against the Constitution, but the foundations of Judeo-Christianity upon which America is historically premised, to which the president appears to have an aversion.

We therefore demand that biblical morality be once again allowed the place of respect it has long enjoyed at the center of our nation's culture—on its own merits, without federal interference of any kind that would violate the First Amendment. We also call for immediately ending the moral and material travesty known as "Obamacare," including any requirement that American citizens or businesses personally underwrite abortion. We believe that the best way to ensure this fortuitous outcome, and reverse these federally-enforced intrusions, is the president's impeachment.

In every stage of these and other oppressions that could be cited, we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms—but our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury and blatant lies. A fraudulent usurper whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant is unfit to be the ruler of a free people, much less their president.

We the People, therefore, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do solemnly publish and declare, that because Barack Hussein Obama has verifiably corrupted, compromised, and endangered the essential institutions of the American Republic, as well as threatened the nation's very survival, we hereby appeal to the next Congress of the United States—which will convene in January 2015—to begin impeachment proceedings against Mr. Obama, and his fellow lawbreakers and facilitators within the Executive Branch, for the purpose of removing them from office with all diligence.

For the support of this action, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, We the People mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor, to save our beloved nation and preserve the rights and freedoms bequeathed us by God and protected by our revered Constitution.

The MCSO Cold Case Posse (CCP) is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. We are awarded no tax dollars and have no paid staff. We are supported by membership dues as well as donations from corporations and individuals in the county we serve.

If you would like to make a contribution to the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Cold Case Posse, please click on the "Donate" button directly below. Your donation is greatly appreciated. Remember, in most cases, your donation to CCP is deductible. Please consult with your tax professional regarding any tax related questions.

By clicking on the below "DONATE" Link, you will be leaving the MCSO Cold Case Posse website. Within a few seconds, your browser will be redirected to a secured Paypal site at which point you can safely and securely make your donation.

Translate

THE TERRY LAKIN STORY

Barack Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” and is thus constitutionally ineligible to be the President and Commander in Chief of our military. Obama was born to a FOREIGN NATIONAL FATHER who was NEVER a U.S. Citizen nor was Obama’s father even an immigrant to the USA or even a permanent resident in the USA. For no other U.S. President in the history of the nation since the founding generation (who were exempt from the natural born Citizen clause in the U.S. Constitution via a grandfather clause in Article II Section 1) was that the case, i.e., having a foreign national father who was never a U.S. Citizen or even an immigrant to this country. Obama being seated as the putative president is an outrageous violation of Article II Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, the presidential eligibility clause. Obama was not born with sole allegiance to the USA. Sole allegiance and unity of Citizenship at birth was the goal and purpose for putting the natural born Citizen clause into Article II Section 1 of the Constitution as to who could serve as president once the founding generation has passed away. Obama (II) was born a British Subject via his foreign national father Obama (Sr.) who was a British Subject. Obama is not a “natural born Citizen of the United States” to constitutional standards since he was born with dual allegiance and citizenship. The founders and framers did not want anyone with foreign allegiance to ever get command of our military, i.e., be the president. Obama is constitutionally not eligible to be president and commander in chief of our military.

The Obama constitutional eligibility issue is not a fringe issue! South Carolina Poll Results – A poll done by Public Policy Polling (PPP) shows that almost 2/3 of GOP voters want Obama’s constitutional eligibility and true legal identity investigated. This is not a fringe issue: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=340805

CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLAR DR. HERB TITUS(Not Mark Levin)
DESCRIBES "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN"December 12, 2011 (TPATH) The honorable John Jay, the first leader of the United States Supreme Court, initiated the insertion of "Natural Born Citizen" into the Constitution for the purpose of setting a higher standard for the office of the President.
All of the verbal gymnastics being put forth by the left, as to the meaning of the term, will eventually be proven to be just what it is.
Unlawful defense of an individual and political party at the expense and detriment of this country.
When you watch this video you will begin to wonder how this country continues to allow such simple and precise language to be twisted, manipulated and convoluted.
WATCH THE VIDEO PART ONEWATCH THE VIDEO PART TWO

We have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on.

On MARCH 23, 1775, Patrick Henry spoke to the Second Virginia Convention, which was meeting in Richmond's St. John's Church due to British hostilities:

"I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery...

We have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated...We have prostrated ourselves before the throne...

Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence."

Patrick Henry continued:

"There is a just God who presides over the destines of nations...who will raise up friends to fight our battle for us.

The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave...

Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God!

I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death."

Miki Booth’s book, Memoirs of a Community Organizer in Hawaii, will be released in late November, 2011. The book chronicles events and experiences over a lifetime culminating in the biggest adventure of all for the writer—an “Adventure in American Politics.” When Miki found others that shared her

Usurper In The White House-Constitutional Crisis

AMERICA IN DISTRESS

Obama Sr a Kenyan was never a US Citizen. He could not pass on US Natural Born Citizenship status to Barack Obama Jr. No matter what is on Obama's birth certificate, no matter where he was born, he can NOT satisfy Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the Constitution.....No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of the President, neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Search This Blog

"Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the Constitution of the United States as our fathers made it inviolate. The people of the United States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts - not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."-- Abraham Lincoln

"Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it."-- John Adams

The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite."-- Thomas Jefferson

"If you love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen."-- Samuel Adams

It has been reported how past Hawaiian State practices with its birth certificate procedures have presented opportunities for birth certificate fraud. An example of such fraud is that of Chinese native, Sun Yat Sen, one of the founders of the Republic of China, who was born in China but was able to obtain a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth in 1904 based on his fraudulent affidavit and evidence submitted by witnesses to the Hawaiian authorities stating that he was born in Hawaii on November 24, 1870. http://www.scribd.com/doc/9830547/Sun-Yatsen-Certification-of-Live-Birth-in-Hawaii. See also the September 2000 report of the Office of Inspector General, entitled “Birth Certificate Fraud,” which provides an update on the nature and extent of birth certificate fraud, found at http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-07-99-00570.pdf. Because of critical importance of knowing for sure who the President is, the potential for birth certificate fraud, and since Obama’s original long-form birth certificate housed in the offices of the Hawaii Department of Health can be some type of certificate (even a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth) that is based on some family member’s affidavit of personal knowledge but which includes no documentary evidence of an actual birth in Hawaii, it becomes crucial to confirm whether there exists any corroborating evidence of Obama actually being born in Hawaii. Consequently, various members of the public have tried to obtain information that would adequately confirm Obama’s and the State of Hawaii’s statements that he was born in Hawaii. These concerned citizens have made requests to the State of Hawaii and to various hospitals there for such information. The State of Hawaii, Kapi’olani Medical Center, and Queens Medical Center (originally claimed by Obama’s sister to by his birth place) have publicly stated that they cannot release the needed details of Obama’s birth, including whether his deceased mother was even a maternity patient in any of those hospitals, because of Obama’s state and federal privacy rights. Not being successful, some of these concerned citizens, feeling duty bound to the Constitution and our country, have filed law suits and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) actions against Obama and others to obtain this information.

Given that Obama and/or his agents have already publicly released some information regarding his place of birth, one commentator, William, has asked me on my blog ( http://puzo1.blogspot.com/. ) whether Obama has waived his privacy rights to such birth information. At least two arguments can be advance that Obama has waived any privacy right that he might have in his birth information located in the State of Hawaii and in its hospitals. One is that he has waived his privacy rights to his alleged long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate by posting his COLB on the internet for the world to see. A problem with this argument is that the COLB does not disclose all his private information (name of hospital, doctors, etc.) and he can argue that his waiver is only as to the information contained on the COLB and no more. As a response, it can be argued that Obama waived his privacy right as to the identity of the hospital in which he was born given that he allegedly wrote a letter dated January 24, 2009 to Kapi’olani Medical Center in which he acknowledge being born there and which letter the hospital posted on its web page (suspiciously posting not a scan of an actual paper letter but only a computer-generated image created with HTML code) for the world to see. For more details, see the WND story on the letter at http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=104146. I have grave doubts whether this letter is authentic given that both Obama and U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie D-Hawaii, who allegedly gave the letter to the hospital and publicly read the letter during the hospital’s centennial celebration, refuse to confirm whether this letter is real.

The second argument is more powerful and convincing. Under Article II, a would-be President must be a “natural born Citizen” to be eligible for the Presidency. Hence, any candidate knows that such “natural born Citizen” status is required to hold the public Office of President. No one winning an election and wanting to fill that public office has a reasonable expectation of privacy as to where he/she was born given that job’s eligibility requirement that one must be a “natural born Citizen.” See my article on this blog entitled, Obama’s Personal Right To Privacy Cannot Trump The Right Of The People To Know Who Their President Is, at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/obamas-personal-right-to-privacy-cannot.html. Of course, that person’s obligation to prove his/her “natural born Citizen” status includes providing credible, competent, and sufficient documentary and other evidence of, among other things, place of birth. Clearly and without doubt, the public interest in knowing that the President-elect is eligible for the office he/she seeks to fill by far out weighs any privacy interest that the person may have in his/her birth documents. It is also clear that knowing who the person is who will occupy the Office of President and Commander in Chief concerns national security and the safety of the United States and the whole world. It is not reasonable to believe that such a person’s privacy interest would out weigh the People’s need to safeguard national security and for self-preservation. Simply put, it would be beyond absurdity to honestly contend that such a person has a right to shield from the same People that he/she is constitutionally duty bound to serve and protect information that he/she must provide to them to show that he/she is qualified for that singular and all-powerful public position which would vest him/her with great power to affect every aspect of the People’s lives.

But underneath the privacy rights question lurks a much more serious concern. We can see the absurdity of Obama sitting on privacy rights to conceal his long-form birth certificate from the public. It is downright despicable for our media and Congress and others to apologize for Obama and let him get away with it. They know full well that he has no such privacy rights. The birth information and documents that Obama refuses to reveal to the public surely are revealing of whether his is eligible to hold the Office of President. Why has the media not filed any legal actions against Obama, the State of Hawaii, and other parties, seeking to legally lift any privacy barriers to Obama’s birth information as it has so many times in the past filed actions against others running for public office who sought to prevent the public from learning details of some aspect of their private lives? What is a travesty of justice is that Obama was probably able to win his U.S. Senate seat because the media (Chicago Tribune) filed a legal action against rival Republican Jack Ryan in which it was successful in getting the “kinky sex” details of his divorce released to the public. Why the media in our country would believe what type of sex two consenting married adults practice is more important than making sure that the national security of our country is protected is beyond comprehension and represents the quintessence of warped priorities. I do not believe that anyone who truly cares about our country and Constitution can express enough in words the outrage that he/she feels about how cowardly our political leaders and media have acted with Obama on the question of his place of birth.

Congress has abdicated its constitutional oath and the media, the so-called fourth branch of our government, has failed to perform its journalistic duty to the People of the United States to assure them that Obama’s election to the highest and most powerful office in the land adhered to our Constitution and laws. Congress has been given a chance to correct its failings and still it refuses to perform its constitutional obligation. With the assistance of its media cronies and others, they all ridicule and suppress the efforts of those who are fighting to make sure that our Constitution has been respected in the last Presidential election and that our nation is safe with Obama currently occupying the Presidency and being the Commander in Chief of our military might.

We must then ask ourselves why Congress and the media have not pressed Obama for the necessary and relevant birth information for at least the sake of the integrity of the Presidential election process and the safety of our nation? Moreover, Obama cannot be an Article II “natural born Citizen” because under the British Nationality Act of 1948 when Obama was born in 1961 his father was a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was born a British subject/citizen. See Obama, the Putative President of the U.S., Is Currently Also a British Citizen, located at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/obama-president-of-us-is-currently-also_29.html. Like a naturalized citizen who is not eligible to be President, Obama was born with an allegiance to a foreign power and is therefore not eligible to be President and more so not eligible to be the leader of our military men and women. To allow Obama to hide his birth information and to not challenge him for not being an Article II “natural born Citizen” is nothing more than at best, politicians and those in their coterie allowing corrupt party politics, self-interest, and/or cowardice to blind their constitutional duty to protect and defend our country and Constitution, at worst, part of someone’s plot to attack and destroy the United States from within, or both. Given that any attack on the United States will most likely come from within, these latter two scenarios must be given serious consideration and ruled out only after sufficient evidence exists to so rule them out. Hence, the deliberate or reckless failing by those who are supposed to protect and defend our country and Constitution is tantamount to treason.

All members of Congress that have allowed and continue to allow the raping of our Constitution and the placing of our nation at risk to being attacked from within need to be removed from Congress, without any exceptions. As to what to do with those members of the media and others who have failed and continue to fail to do their job to adequately protect and defend our Constitutional Republic, that is a question for another day.