Gordon Campbell on how the Republicans just buried the TPP

In case you were still holding your breath about the Trans Pacific Partnership trade deal, you can relax. For months, it has seemed increasingly unlikely that a Republican- dominated Congress would ratify the TPP, and the battle lines have now been drawn. Yesterday, Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell told the White House not to bring the controversial trade pact before Congress until after the presidential election has been resolved in November, 2016.

McConnell, who has expressed concerns about the 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and has yet to take a stance, said President Obama is risking defeat of his signature trade deal if he tries to push for passage before a lame-duck session next year. “It certainly shouldn’t come before the election,” McConnell told The Washington Post in an interview.

“I think the president would be making a big mistake to try to have that voted on during the election. There’s significant pushback all over.” Obama is already facing a slim margin of support in each chamber. With minimal support from his own party, Republicans who granted Obama fast-track authority on trade deals have said support didn’t mean automatic passage for the TPP pact. “I think it would be a big mistake to send it up [for ratification].”

This doesn’t mean the White House won’t take the risk. Yet at the moment, the TPP looks as if it would be doomed if sent to Congress during 2016 in the midst of the election campaign that’s already well under way. Theoretically, some tactical campaign advantage might be gained by the Democrats in using the TPP as a weapon to expose Republican hypocrisy on this issue – but the Democrats are themselves deeply divided about the deal.

Among the Republican contenders, only Donald Trump has strongly and consistently opposed the TPP. Both Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush voted in favour of giving Barack Obama fast track authority to pass the deal. Ted Cruz and Rand Paul voted against. During 2015, Cruz and Rubio ( in particular ) professed themselves to be strongly in favour of free trade in general and Rubio described the TPP mid-year in very glowing terms.

“I’ll tell you, I am very, very skeptical about TPP” he said on the Laura Ingraham show. “This thing is six thousand pages… It is negotiated by a president who has undercut American workers at every level and I think it is a mistake to be undercutting the working men and women of this country.” Cruz also suggested that Congress shouldn’t have a lame duck session.

“And in fact, if a Republican wins in 2016, which I believe will happen, I don’t think we should have a lame duck session… No conservative would want a bunch of members who have just been defeated or [are] retiring passing big government liberal policies with Obama in office. TPP needs to be voted on when members are accountable.”

This doesn’t mean that in 2017, the process of gaining presidential fast track authority to pass the deal will have to be repeated. Surprisingly, those powers will carry over to the next President. For the next 12 months though, the TPP has almost certainly been shelved. Ironically and amusingly, the final straw for the Republicans turned out to be the investor-state dispute mechanisms contained in the TPP – and the threat that the exemptions to those ISD mechanisms ( on health grounds) may pose to Big Tobacco.

The deal includes a provision that gives countries more power to regulate manufactured tobacco products, such as cigarettes, as part of any efforts to protect public health. Under the exemption, companies can’t challenge tobacco control measures under the Investor-State Dispute Settlement process.

The White House has argued that the tobacco provisions are narrowly focused on health issues and don’t affect the trade of tobacco leaf. But the move has already led to the loss of Republican votes on both sides of the Capitol.

So…. the TPP is being shelved because the Republican Party want to be sure the world cannot be formally allowed, under its provisions, to pass regulations against the tobacco industry to protect public health. They want ISD, but without exemptions. Well, its not the reason that you or I would choose to stop the TPP, but it’ll do for now. Canada, BTW, will be very pleased that the TPP has stalled. It will get Justin Trudeau and his new and supposedly progressive Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland. off the hook for the time being

Clark and the UN job

So already, the gender card is being played in the Helen Clark campaign for the secretary-general job at the United Nations. That’s not a strong argument. Mainly because Eastern Europe ( whose turn it is to lead the organisation under the rotational system that’s currently in force, has several strong potential candidates – some of whom are women. They will almost certainly include Irina Bokova, who – like Clark – heads a major United Nations organization, UNESCO in her case.

At the time, Bokova was accused of giving into to Arab pressure, but organizers of the exhibition later said she had regained their esteem by making public statements that could be characterized as strongly “pro-Jewish.”

Of late, Bokova has seemed to be buckling under US/Israeli pressure, and she may not be the ideal candidate. Yet if Clark is to have any real chance, it will be by running as the de facto American candidate, with her gender as a smokescreen for a US-led campaign to deny eastern Europe ( and by geographic proximity, the Russians) their rightful turn at the helm of the global organisation. Forgive me my lack of enthusiasm at the prospect.

Dawn of the Staple Singers

The late flowering of Mavis Staples’ career will – I hope – inspire many people to check out the brilliant early gospel tracks by the Staple Singers, where Mavis Staples is perfectly cradled by the family harmonies and by her father’s wonderfully innovative tremolo guitar. “Low Is The Way “ is a personal favourite dating from the very outset of the group’s career, and “ I Had a Dream” from the same sessions is almost as good.

I think the TPPA has two years allowed for ratification before it comes fully into action. Therefore a delay in the US won’t significantly matter nor protect us. Also, the US can go ahead with their process of examining our laws to make sure they comply with US laws while waiting, and we will have to adjust our laws to meet US demands as happened when Australia signed their trade agreement with the US.

A worse case scenario could be that 10-11 nations sign on, as Key will do on 4 February, and the US stays out. That would give US corporations all the rights of the TPPA relative to NZ but give NZ no rights relative to US.

I’ve followed a lot of TPP politics, and since this article shows me you’ve gone even farther, I wonder if you’ve run across any mention of what a superb weapon the ISDS mechanisms in the TPP and its cousins would be for ISIS?

At this moment, ISIS is doing business with many outside parties (including those who are fighting it), selling its oil and presumably banking the take and using it in trade via the usual corporate mechanisms.

With the chain of corporate ownership so easily manipulated to hide true ownership, how could ISIS be prevented from forming numerous transnational corporations and filing legal actions, baseless or not, that would seriously disrupt the economies of the signatories, and perhaps even make ISIS lots of money? They could front for corporations that don’t want to be seen to sue.

Has such a question ever been addressed with respect to the ISDSs? Or is it assumed that corporations are inherently ethical and honourable, so no vetting of complainants is required. And if there *are* such mechanisms to distinguish “good” from “bad” corporations, what are they?

The TPPA is rumored to be signed at Waitangi,the chosen time and place for another unlawful theft of the people of New Zealands sovereignty.
I suggest that if Key arrives the people( all races)turn and silently walk away.
Background Crowded House ‘I walk away’ it is filmed and goes globally viral. Showing that the people of NZ (the effected party in this agreement’) do not consent to the Bankster’s corporate fraud.

I am not sure where Key is signing it but I do know contract law and that the ‘effected party’ is the people of NZ. They have not agreed and did not even get disclosure before the TPPA negotiations closed.
You are right about it being illegal and unlawful ( SDR to procure the NZ govt)and that is why their (controlled) opposition leader was a Crown employee lawyer Kelsey.

Become a Werewolf.co.nz Sustaining Subscriber!

Join the alternative to the mainstream media mind-set!

We are seeking your help to keep Werewolf.co.nz going. If you agree to become a Werewolf Sustaining Subscriber we are asking you to subscribe to pay $10, $15 (or more if you choose) a month to support Werewolf. This can be done either via:

Make A One Off Donation
Instead of spending $10 a month on magazines and newspapers, why not pledge that to sustaining one of the most promising media prospects on the New Zealand media landscape today!