Unemployment fluctuates

California’s unemployment rate was at 5.6% in August 2016, down from the previous month and well below 6.5% one year ago. The unemployment rate will likely rise as prospective employees slowly return to the labor force. As of August, the labor force participation (LFP) rate is at 62.7%, up from a year earlier. This is the highest LFP since 2013 and it is expected to increase steadily — a trend that will outpace job creation and drive up unemployment rates.

A higher participation rate means prospective employees are gaining a more positive perception of the job market. As Californians become more confident a job is attainable (or retainable), the housing industry will experience increased buyer-occupant participation. Further, though labor force participation will increase faster than job creation and, thus, stall wage increases, the return of Californians to the job market is nonetheless prophetic of solid job growth and an eventual rise in home sales volume.Last updated 09/21/2016. Original copy released 12/30/2009. This chart is no longer updated. [See our article, The unemployment rate is useless for real estate]

Chart update 09/21/16

Aug 2016

Jul 2016

Aug 2015

CA Unemployment Rate

5.6%

5.9%

6.1%

Number Unemployed

1,076,300

1,135,400

1,159,400

LFP Rate

62.7%

62.7%

62.2%

The most recent peak month for unemployment was January 2010, when 2,350,200 people were registered as unemployed in California, a 12.7% unemployment rate. Excluded from these unemployment numbers are individuals who have dropped out of the labor force entirely, either for retirement or lack of available work.

The labor force participation (LFP) rate tracks the percentage of the state population who are actively working or looking for work. This rate has undergone a nearly-constant decline since the start of the 2008 recession, flattening out during the past 12 months. However, the LFP rate is expected to rise as Californians return to the job market, which bodes well for home sales volume in the next few years.

Nonetheless, some individuals will remain unemployed longer. 18.2% of those unemployed in August 2016 had been without work for 52 weeks (one year) or more. These individuals will face great difficulty ever getting a job, one of the tragedies of government’s failure to fulfill its role as the employer of last resort in recessions.

Unemployment Statewide

Glancing at the chart above, the cycle of joblessness as it is tied to economic booms and recessions over the past 30 years is apparent. Unemployment in 2011 lingered at a higher percentage of the total labor force than at any time in recent history. This was the sharpest spike in unemployment since the Great Depression, brought on by the 2008 recession and financial crisis.

Unemployment began to decrease in 2012 and remains low in 2016. However, unemployment will not be down to acceptable levels until the 2018 period. Labor force participation will pick up and initially manifest as increased unemployment numbers for a year or two. At the same time, job growth will gain the momentum needed to bring the state’s growing population up to full employment.

Jobs are vital

Of all the factors affecting California real estate, employment has the most impact. This is true in good economic times, times of economic recession and times of financial crisis.

Without jobs, wage earners have no financial ability to make rent or mortgage payments. Thus, the unemployed are forced to move in with relatives or friends, negatively impacting the rental, home resale and construction markets.

All indicators point toward a prolonged wait before sufficient jobs begin to return to the California labor market to eventually spur a normal housing demand.

Thus, most of the slower-than-usual recovery of lost jobs experienced these past five plus years is behind us. By extension, we have endured a lack of occupying-buyers and tenants for all types of real estate. An exception is residential rentals in coastal areas.

High rates of workers were pushed involuntarily from full-time to part-time employment by the 2008 recession.

950,000 California employees in August 2016 – 5.3% of employed workers – reported they were working part time for “economic reasons.” In addition, the majority of 2009’s massive job losses were not simply temporary layoffs; they have become permanent as reported by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (FRBSF). This premature permanent retirement from the work force will benefit landlords of modest rental properties, not sellers of real estate.

A higher-than-normal rate of involuntary part-time work will interfere with employers hiring new workers. High levels of part-time workers cause employers to fill new full-time positions with current temporary and part time workers.

Worse, 18.2% of CA’s unemployed have been jobless for 52 weeks (one year) or more, as of August 2016. They have little chance of employment for years to come when labor again becomes scarce.

During “ordinary” recessions, the wages of permanent employees generally continue to rise, but do so at a much slower rate, staying under the rate of inflation. This allows employers to cut operating costs without damaging the overall morale of their employees.

But the financial crisis brought deflation in the prices of goods and services sold. This condition forced employers to drop wages and hours worked in order to compensate for their leaner sales.

As for California, average weekly overtime hours in manufacturing leveled out in 2013 at 41.1 hours — unchanged since 2011 — and have likely displayed little upward movement since. This is a sign that employers have begun in earnest their quest to add employees, reflected in the generally increasing annual rate of new employees monthly in California.

Slow to hire in recoveries

Analysts face three employment issues when it comes to judging the pace of a recovery:

full employment;

unemployment; and

under employment.

Full employment involves a high level of full-time (40-hour week) employees. On the other hand, under employment occurs for those workers pushed from full-time to part-time (as with those employed in manufacturing and construction). Also under employed are those who experience shorter work weeks (as with those working for the state government), temporary layoffs and low overtime. Further, under employment occurs when highly skilled workers take lower-paying jobs to supplement a career loss.

Under employment is a separate phenomenon from unemployment. Under employment means hours worked per week are cut, while unemployment means a permanent, unpaid vacation.

However, underemployment and unemployment must both be considered in order to gauge the pace of recovery to full-time jobs. Why? When the economy begins to bounce back as it did in 2012, employers will not react to improved business by immediately hiring new workers. Thus, brokers will be left with the same, flat number of families qualified for home loans and rent in 2016.

Employment numbers returned to pre-recession levels in 2014. However, with the intervening population increase of 1.2 million working-age individuals, it will likely be 2018 or 2019 when employment is truly recovered.

For the ever-increasing population of California (around 400,000 annually since 2007), the coming job recovery translates into a long period of unemployment for those who enter the labor force and do not quickly find a job.

The spikes in unemployment of 1983 and 1993 each took over five years before full recovery; this one will take three years longer, well into 2016.

In the meantime, any news of job recovery released for the nation as a whole will differ wildly from what most Californians will experience. Further, jobs vary by region in California. Therefore, watch particular areas for the best employment data of when local jobs will fully recover (Bay area versus San Bernardino). Real estate’s recovery, too, will wait for the inevitable rise in employment to create homebuyers and tenants.

Unemployment in California will not stabilize until well into 2016. All the while, California unemployment will be reported at relatively high levels until the 2018-2019 period. Ten years of population growth since 2007 totals around 4,000,000 additional residents to make room for during this extended recovery, nearly 1,800,000 needing jobs.

Jobs are vital
The path of the real estate market is determined by 26 factors, which will set the pace of our recovery from this financial crisis. Of these factors, employment has the most impact on the vigor of home sales and home pricing. A person’s income from a job (or subsidy) is required to pay for shelter, whether that shelter takes the form of single family residential housing or nonresidential space for a business, rented or owned. Only those with a source of income can afford rent or mortgage payments, and only businesses providing steady employment require space in office, retail or industrial properties for workers, inventories and production. [See first tuesday article, The Economic Restructuring of Real Estate.]Continued job lossAll indicators point toward a prolonged wait, well into 2013, before sufficient jobs begin to return to the California labor market (the market will require at least 350,000 new jobs annually to complete its recovery). Thus, we can expect a slower-than-usual recovery of full-time jobs lost and, by extension, a continuing lack of buyers and tenants for all types of real estate, with the exception of some residential rentals in coastal areas.A high rate of workers has been pushed involuntarily from full-time to part-time employment.1,440,000 CA employees in November 2011 – 9% of our employed workers – reported they were currently working part time for “economic reasons.”In addition, the majority of 2009’s massive job losses were not simply temporary layoffs; they have become permanent as reported by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (FRBSF). This premature permanent retirement from the work force will benefit landlords, not sellers of real estate.In November 2011, 33% of CA’s unemployed reported being jobless for 52 weeks (one year)or more. Our CA-located FRBSF suggests that a higher-than-normal rate of involuntary part-time work and a low and declining rate of temporary layoffs will prevent employers from wanting to hire new workers anytime soon, as they are more likely to fill new full-time positions with current temporary and part time workers. [For more information on partial employment, see the FRBSF article, Jobless Recovery Redux?.]Employers nationwide were resorting to wage cuts coupled with furloughs in order to lower costs and keep businesses open during the financial crisis, as reported in 2009 by the Economist magazine. These cuts have not since been discontinued. This trend is unlike recent recessions, since a typical recession will bring a rise in unemployment but no drop in wages.During ‘ordinary’ recessions, the wages of permanent employees generally continue to rise, but do so at a much slower rate, staying under the rate of inflation. This allows employers to cut operating costs without damaging the overall morale of their employees. But the financial crisis has brought deflation in the prices of goods and services sold, thus forcing employers nationally to drop wages and hours worked in order to compensate for their leaner sales. [See The Economist article The Quiet Americans.]As for California, an unhealthy downward trend in average weekly overtime hours in manufacturing now exists. Average weekly overtime hours have decreased 11% over the six year period ending in November 2011; not a good thing for individuals employed in manufacturing.The decline in overtime hours argues against any speedy recovery in the jobs market. Overtime hours mustincrease before an employer begins to hire additional staff. Overall, hours worked have risen somewhat over the past year, but are unlikely to show any significant gains before 2014. Until hiring picks up significantly for a period of at least 18 months, real estate sales and rental occupancies will remain stagnant.Slow to hireJobs present a trifurcated employment issue when it comes to judging the pace of a recovery:

full employment;

unemployment; and

underemployment.

Full employment involves a large number of full-time (40-hour week) employees with a high amount of overtime hours (2 to 4 hours weekly). On the other hand, workers pushed from full-time to part-time (as with those employed in manufacturing and construction), shorter work weeks (as with those working for the government), low levels of temporary layoffs and low overtime all point to underemployment. Underemployment, which refers to the number of hours worked per week, is a separate phenomenon from unemployment, which refers to a permanent unpaid vacation.

However, underemployment and unemployment must both be considered in order to gauge the pace of recovery to full-time jobs, the prerequisite to a robust real estate leasing and sales market. The reason: when the economy does begin to bounce back, employers will not react to improved business by immediately hiring new workers. Brokers will have to continue to wait for some time before the next wave of families qualifies for home loans or rent.

California has begun the stabilization of employment since it added around 200,000 new jobs in 2010. However, building up to sufficient new employment – 350,000 to 400,000 new jobs annually – is an ongoing process, and will not fully develop before 2014. Employment numbers will likely return to pre-recession levels by 2016. Allow for a lag in time before any regular increase in the number of prospective buyers and tenants except for the demand for rentals created by the SFR foreclosures and shortsales. For the ever-increasing population of California (presently over 400,000 annually), the coming job recovery translates into a long period of unemployment for those who enter the labor force and do not quickly find a job, the result of this Lesser Depression. [For more information on California population, see first tuesday’s market chart, Rate of Population Growth: CA v. US]

Unemployment has remained at a higher percentage of the work force for the past two years than it has been since WWII, and it is worse in California than in the rest of the nation. The spikes in unemployment of 1983 and 1993 each took over five years before full recovery; this one will take two or three years longer, well into 2016.

In the meantime, any news of job recovery released for the nation as a whole will differ wildly from what most Californians will experience. Real estate’s recovery, too, will wait for the inevitable rise in employment.

To put it bluntly, the financial crisis will be embarrassingly long and financially troublesome for those impatient and overly-optimistic folks expecting a quick recovery – and easy profits. And unlike the “garden-variety” business recessions of recent years, this recession and its concurrent financial crisis are destined to affect the real estate market much longer than any recession since the Great Depression – sales volume will remain essentially flat through 2015.

Unemployment in California will not stabilize until well into 2015, and it will take until 2016 to regain the 1,060,800 jobs lost (as of November 2011) and return to the December 2007 peak in California employment.

Not everything is so bleak: income property prices reset more quickly, and their sales volume will pick up much sooner, since their prices are determined by a different set of calculations (capitalization rates) and attitudes about risk taking than the methods used to evaluate single family residential real estate. Buyers of both types of property will be best rewarded if, before they begin to buy, they wait for the ultimate end to this real estate recession, which will arrive just after the Fed first raises short term interest rates, following a significant reduction in trustee’s sales has taken place. [For information on trustee’s sales in California, see first tuesday’s Market Chart, NODs and Trustee’s Deeds Recorded Quarterly.]
[For the obverse side of the jobs coin, the 91% of the pre-recession jobholders who remain employed throughout California, and the role they continue to play in the state’s real estate market, see first tuesday’s Market Chart, Jobs Move Real Estate.]

3 Comments

As we all know by now, those persons who have ceased looking for employment are NOT counted in the statistics, and those persons are great in number.

That means the TRUE unemployment figures are MUCH higher than the mere 11% the government loves to quote. Some sources place it between 16 and 20%, possibly more.

Add to that the massive numbers of non-documented aliens in California who work in the shadow economy—or now, who DON’T work in that shadow economy, because they cannot find much work—and you get figures rivaling the Great Depression of the 1930’s.

The banking elite planned it all, caused it all, and sought to crush the common man into financial subservience. The whole system they have in place is based on fractional reserve banking—the biggest ponzi scheme in the history of the world—where money is created out of thin air.

The contrived “housing collapse” played a significant role in achieving their ends.

Do their methods serve the common citizen? They DO NOT! They serve to enrich the banking elite and its inner circle while impoverishing the people of America.

But, due to the growing LIBOR scandal, hundreds of lawsuits are being brought against the Banking Cartel by local, state, and federal authorities. These vile parasites whose only interest is in enriching themselves, will be brought to justice finally, but not after having almost collapsed the entire economy of the Western world.

klesb Mike, you have identified the problem well. Democrats in government are anxiously trying to apply their economic theories to issues that require market based solutions... – Los Angeles rental crisis continues in 2019

Featured Comment

Zestimates are great conversation starters with sellers and buyers. Zillow has done more for our bottom line than NAR ever has or will. Don’t fight the current of the river, learn to run with it. Disruption is inevitable in any industry that is fragmented or inefficient. Granted, it does feel like armchair experts and platforms are plentiful in real estate these days, but when the tide rolls out we will see the value proposition of the truest professionals in this industry shine once again.