Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I. Are Mary's Statements and Emails Constitutionally Protected Forms of Free Speech?
II. Is the Scope of the Protection Order Too Broad?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I.While the question of whether speech is constitutionally protected is a question of law, it is the trial court's interpretation of the facts as to the nature of the speech that is determinative. The trial court's findings that Mary's conduct was
not constitutionally protected is a correct one.
II.The granting or denial of a disorderly conduct restraining order is directed to the trial. Judge's sound discretion which must be reviewed to determine whether the lower court acted in an arbitrary, unreasonable or unconscionable matter or
whether it's decision was the product of a rational mental process leading to a reasoned determination. The trial court's decision herein was not an abuse of discretion.