I am new the SCP foundation but I think I still made a pretty good job. I have two questions: should I make the conference more serious and should I be more specific on the confinement? Please say what you think about it and what I should change. Thanks!http://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com/utube-nobb

Object Class: "Euclid" This is correct, this skip needs attention, although it doesn't have to be a big enough production to warrant a Keter classification.

Special Containment Procedures:

This is due to XXXX destroying and not complying to our own recreation of a conference room.

Unnecessary. You don't have to explain every fine detail of the containment; doing this bogs down the reader.

The reason of the wanted Conference room is totally unknown to us because of the limited Communication we have with it

Unless its a proper noun, don't capitalize it. Also, write in clinical tone. Do not use first or second person pronouns or contractions.

There is one door leading out of the room which leads to a room with ten double beds for them to sleep in

Refer to them as "the entities", not "them". Personnel aren't supposed to grow attached to SCPs, so there ends up being a degree of dehumanization.

The bedroom have three doors

Rrgh. "The bedrooms have"

SCP XXXXs containment is availible to level 2 personnel and above

What does this mean? Do you need to be level to to contain XXXX? Is L2 access required to know about XXXX? or do you have to be Level 2 to interact with it? Also, its "available", not "availible"

When transporting XXXX you should tell XXXX that they're being transported to a speech (the type of speech doesn't matter to XXXX) and they will comply without resistence. When it is at the wanted location they will not care if it is a speech or not.

Again, no second person, remember to dehumanize. They're anomalies, not people.

is to be replace

"is to be replaced"

Description:

SCP-XXXX is twenty different bodies and through DNA tests, we have discovered that all of these bodies belong to the same SCP.

"Twenty different bodies" Try

SCP-XXXX is a group of 20 humanoid entities.

How would a DNA test determine that people are part of the same anomaly? That's not how DNA works.

They call themselves "humans" and refuse to listen when call them XXXX. You can’t tell that they’re SCPs just by looking at it because it’s appearances is identical to a human and they wear suits.

The only valuable information here is that they all wear suits.

Your list could be better organized, I'm not good at css, but somewhere, there's code for a table. A table is more visually appealing than a list of names.

Refer to it as SCP-XXXX, not just "XXXX".

Okay, so they get mad and shoot each other, but regenerate.

These meeting often result the SCP to fight the others because of their different political views.

Try:

These meetings often end in the entities fighting each other due to their differing political perspectives, often involving gunfire.

When an fight starts it usually ends with someone pulling out a gun from their jacket and shooting someone else

This can be combined with the previous sentence (see above edit)

This results in the shot one dying (from now on referred to as XXXX-2), but after ~12 hours XXXX-2 and its respective suit have regenerated the wounds. We are unable to confiscate the guns because they appear only when someone shoots and the gun disappears again shortly after. It is still unknown how it heals, the suits heal, summons guns and knows about the latest news.

Try this:

Entities who have been shot “die”, but regenerate approximately 12 hours later. Personnel have been unable to confiscate SCP-XXXX’s weapons, as they only appear during an “argument”.

Of course they don’t know how any of these things are done. Otherwise, it wouldn’t be anomalous.

They don’t need to fulfill their needs on the toilet so often because most of the nutrition from the food they consume goes to their healing abilities. But they shower daily to remove the bloodstains from their clothes and bodies.

I’m sorry, WHY do i need to know this?

As for the conference: yes, this does need to be more serious. The entire article needs to be serious.

Thoughts: This is not "a pretty good job". This is a bunch of people who kill each other over and over again. What is the point of this article? Why should I upvote this? Seriousness of the meeting and more specific containment procedures are the least of your problems. You don’t have clinical tone anywhere, and your grammar is suffering, in addition to being boring. This is basically a conference where everyone present is Deadpool. I suggest trying something more interesting for your first SCP.