‘Big Switch’ RIAs Now Regulated by States Exhibit Similar Deficiencies on Exams: NASAA

A NASAA report on advisors who switched from SEC to state oversight shows deficiencies similar to smaller RIAs who had been regulated by the states.

Share with Email

sending now...

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Just released exam data of advisors who switched from federal to state oversight earlier this year shows similarities in the type or frequency of deficiencies between those advisors previously registered with the states, according to the North American Securities Administrators Association.

The little difference in the types and frequency of deficiencies “demonstrates that states and NASAA worked hard to inform and educate switching advisers [about states’ examination procedures] before and during the switch,” said Heath Abshure, NASAA president and Arkansas Securities Commissioner, in a statement.

NASAA’s 2013 Examination Report, released Monday at NASAA’s annual meeting in Salt Lake City, included exam data on 1,130 advisors reported voluntarily between January and June 2013 by 44 state and provincial securities examiners. The 2013 exams uncovered 6,482 deficiencies in 20 compliance areas, compared to 3,543 deficiencies in 13 compliance areas identified in a similar 2011 report of 825 investment advisors.

Under the Dodd-Frank Act, about 2,100 mid-sized investment advisors with AUM between $30 million and $100 million switched from federal to state oversight earlier this year.

The top five deficiencies for advisors with less than $30 million in assets under management involved books and records, registration, contracts, privacy and brochure delivery.

The top five deficiencies found among advisors with more than $30 million in AUM—which included 411 advisors (36.8%)–involved books and records, registration, contracts, advertising and fees.

Every two years, state securities examiners voluntarily report sample data from their advisor exams to NASAA’s Investment Adviser Operations Project Group. “Using this sample data helps NASAA identify common regulatory deficiencies and recommend best practices that investment advisers should consider to minimize the risk of regulatory violations,” said Abshure (who also blogs regularly for ThinkAdvisor).

NASAA said that deficiencies were also found in advertising, fees, supervision, custody, financials, investment activities and unethical practices.

Based on the 2013 sample data, NASAA said that it recommends the following “Best Practices” to help newly switching advisors:

Make sure clients’ investment policy and suitability information are current.

Disclose soft dollars or benefits received.

Prepare and maintain current client profiles.

Review solicitor agreements, disclosure, and delivery procedures.

Melanie Waddell

Melanie is Washington Bureau Chief, Investment Advisory Group. She also covers regulatory and compliance issues and writes The Playing Field column and Human Capital briefing. Reach her at mwaddell@alm.com. On twitter: @Think_MelanieW

ThinkAdvisor

Free unlimited access to ThinkAdvisor.com which provides advisors, like you, with comprehensive coverage of the products, services and trends necessary to guide your clients in making critical wealth, health and life decisions.

Exclusive discounts on ALM and ThinkAdvisor events.

Access to other award-winning ALM websites including TreasuryandRisk.com and Law.com.