My life is a finite period of time, Gary. I'm not going to study a "theory" which can't be cogently summarised by its own author. Sure, it may be a groundbreaking, paradigm-shattering piece of work, but if you're not prepared to explain or discuss, it's indistinguishable from the ravings of a loony.

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 02 2012,15:07)

Only reason I know for genuinely coming up with a statement like that, is cherry picking quotes to take out of context in order to try quickly brushing-off the theory.

I quoted the entire statement you referenced. If that constitutes "cherry-picking", you shouldn't have linked to it. Do you have a summary you're prepared to stand by?

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 02 2012,15:07)

That is clearly not what I said, and I don't have a hundred years to spoon feed ones who can't handle what is now K-12 level science.

Yes, I know, you are Teh Super Genuis and we are not worthy. Which K-12 schools are teaching your "theory" in science class? Do tell.

For the nth and likely last time, because I've got more productive things to do: what is your theory? "Go study it" is not an answer.

--------------Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"... The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG