The
unilateral physical take-over of Mulbadaw Farm and Central
Maintenance and Service Centre by order from the Foundation
Friends of Haydom in Norway; without producing any court
injunction or any legal document authorizing such a take-over.

The
conduct of the chairman of the Board of Directors of Haydom
Development Company Ltd; his lack of loyalty to lawful
decisions made by the Board in 2006 and his unauthorized and
secret dealings with Joseph Tadayo leading up to the
unilateral physical take-over mentioned above.

The
deceit by FoH in fulfilling their own board decision of
October 2005 in financing HDC Ltd

The
lack of registration of the entity running Mulbadaw Farm and
Central Maintenance and Service Centre after 12th
August 2006; how can a foreign foundation own and run
businesses in Tanzania without being registered in Tanzania?

The
suspicion of corruption aimed at avoiding the case to be
considered by the court.

Lack
of transparency

Posted
07.05.2013

New master thesis calls for transparency

Hlin
Irene Sagen Grung has written a Master's Thesis (The University of
Agder) in Norway from 2011 titled "Haydom
Lutheran Hospital: A Sustainable
Health-Providing Organization or a ‘White
Elephant’?" In her thesis
she writes on page 73 and 74 under the heading”5.10.13 HLH as a Development
Agent”:

“The
last farm to be bought was the Mulbadaw farm. However, due to conflict
between HLH, the local populations and the former administrative-team at
Mulbadaw, I was discouraged from including any discussion of the farm into
this thesis (Interview A9).Moreover, during the pre-visit to HLH, it
became apparent that the Medical Director did not know that he was part of
the board at Mulbadaw. To me the lack of transparency, willingness to
discuss the farm and lack of knowledge about responsibilities towards the
farm, questions the actual processes behind the conflict and how it is
handled by the management at HLH (see Chapter 8). It is also my belief
that not being proactive towards the conflict and going into dialogue with
the local population could threaten the future sustainability of HLH.”

On page 73 and 74under
the heading“8.3
Skepticism by the Administration” Grung writes:

”There
was also unwillingness amongst administration, staff and volunteers to
discuss parts of my initial thesis, notably the Mulbadaw
Farm. The farm therefore had to be partly excluded from my thesis. However, I
still firmly believe that the farm is of great importance when analyzing
the future sustainability of HLH and HLH’s relationship with the local
community. Especially, with the ongoing conflict of who is in charge and
who is the owner of the farm. My point of view is that this conflict
reduces the trustworthiness of HLH and therefore its future sustainability.”

As you can read it's not only HDC that's surprised by the lack of
transparency concerning the Mulbadaw farm. Read the whole thesis here.