Opinion Digests

Where respondent-mother’s parental rights were terminated, we affirm. Respondent claims the court improperly considered the testimony of an expert witness. The expert interviewed the children once and relied on information supplied by the Department of Social Services in concluding that ...

Where a reprimand was within the hearing panel’s discretion under the facts of this case, we affirm. Respondent was reprimanded for 1) filing a late appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and 2) sending ...

Where plaintiff attempted to close the doors of his truck, he was completing the unloading process. Therefore, the trial court properly found that sec. 3106(2) of the no-fault statute precluded plaintiff from receiving benefits for the injury he suffered while ...