Before you roll out an app, you want to make sure that it meets the expectations and satisfaction of your users. Testing functionality solely is not enough to win a user. It is also vital to conduct compatibility and performance testing, as every of your app user could hold a different device model from various OEMs. To deliver the best experience, you need an advanced mobile app testing solution to address your daily tasks and make your life easier.

Today we will review 5 considerations in mobile testing to help you find the right solution for you and help you move forward.

Support for Testing on Real Devices

The debate of relying on real devices or emulators for mobile testing has been hot for a long time. While many developers still insist on using emulators for whatever reasons, it’s time to shift your mindset to relying on real devices.

Customers’ taste is changing rapidly and any minimal fault in quality would drive customer churn. Using real device for testing apps will never put your business at stake.

Support for Both Automated and Manual Testing

Manual testing was the main approach for developers to ensure software quality. However, manual testing might not always be effective in finding certain classes of defects. What makes things worse, as the mobile grows, manual testing becomes a sluggish practice for mobile quality assurance when you are facing a huge device pool. With that being said, manual testing still makes sense, such as running app checks on 1 or 2 devices, managing app quality when an automated testing strategy is not in place, etc.

Regardless of what, at some point your team will need to deploy an automated mobile testing strategy to improve testing effectiveness and efficiency, save efforts and time, and scale your business. Automated testings allow you to test apps against hundreds or thousands of devices simultaneously and free up developers’ time for new features. Results? You can achieve faster iteration and release more frequently with more features.

Support for (Multiple) Your Desired Frameworks

When you mainly rely on automated testing approach, using the best testing framework that works (free webinar) for you can greatly facilitate your testing efforts and help you achieve testing goals. While you may take advantage of one testing framework to manage 80% of your automated test cases, from time to time you need a different framework to get the rest of your builds tested.

At this point, you will benefit from a sophisticated testing solution with support of multiple frameworks. No need to find another solution, no need to learn a new platform, more importantly, no need to double the cost of ownership.

Support for Integrations with Development Tools

Today’s mobile development and software are all about the agile process. With the practice of Continuous Integration (CI) adopted in the organization, roles overlap between developers and testers. Mobile developers occasionally bear the responsibilities of testing projects they build, and QA teams are also involved in debugging phase to locate the bugs and pinpoint to developers. For either team, the familiarity of their own development or testing environment affects the productivity.

By integrating with different development toolsets, a mobile testing solution can really enable developers to start test runs in their integrated development environment (IDE), Xcode, Android Developer Tools (ADT), Jenkins, etc. Apparently, this integration is imperative for small businesses where a developer also acts as a tester.

Fulfillment for Agile

If you get everything above mentioned but fail to get agile process, you’ll still lose the competition.

Modern software development and testing need an agile process. Mobile users have lots of alternatives from the market. Companies who can’t act and respond quickly to customers’ need and requirements will eventually fade away from customers’ minds.

When negative reviews emerge for whatever reasons on app markets, you need to solve your app users’ questions and puzzles quickly and smartly – have your developers debug apps, fix the bugs and hand it over to testers to do holistic app check. The whole workflow should be shortened to one sprint.