My comment here hints at using blog posts and comments to build a database of suspicious corporations who abuse the patent system.

News flash: using prior art information gathering devices to build databases of information is both ineligible and obvious. Will someone please tell the incompetent director of the USPTO to maybe do something about this cr@ p? Pretty sure all you need is a really fancy car and maybe some nice seats at a sporting event and you can get whatever want from Iancu.

“A method comprising: detecting … one of a plurality of entities within a proximity of [an] autonomous vehicle; determining … a location of the one of the entities …; determining… a type of the one of the entities; determining … a predefined message to be presented to the one of the entities…[using] …a speaker.”

Evidently this case was examined by a six year old. Or perhaps Iancu, an incompetent compromised fraud, just did a “solid” for one of his wealth Silly Con Valley Bros at Lyft.

What other explanation is there? Everyone involved with this ridiculously offensive junk should be banned from the patent system for life. C l u e l e ss disgusting greedy children.

It’s beyond hilarious that you think this sideshow peeve of yours is going to change anything.

Maybe you can aim your water pistol at the folks who use terms like “determine”, “compare”, “reconcile”, “brain”, “intelligence” etc etc ad nauseum when discussing computers. Have fun, Billy!

LOL

the zombie of the Mental Steps Doctrine

? Try writing an argument using declarative sentences in plain English, Billy. Start from first principles. I know it’s really hard for you but your mommy can hold your hand and help you sharpen the crayons if you get frustrated.