Comments on: It’s power rankings timehttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/08/its-power-rankings-time-2/
ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.comTue, 03 Mar 2015 20:38:11 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/By: mophaticihttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/08/its-power-rankings-time-2/#comment-2852703
Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:45:30 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2215863#comment-2852703percipacious-(adj) a descriptor for those without the perspicacity to spell correctly. origin: some anarchist’s blog who doesn’t believe in the conventions of spelling.
]]>By: thinkarezhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/08/its-power-rankings-time-2/#comment-2851941
Tue, 08 Oct 2013 20:09:29 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2215863#comment-2851941Bengals are way too low I get Dalton sucks but the rest of the team is really good!
]]>By: mrlalooshhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/08/its-power-rankings-time-2/#comment-2851247
Tue, 08 Oct 2013 17:25:17 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2215863#comment-2851247The Bengals have fans? Who knew!
]]>By: footballchic777http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/08/its-power-rankings-time-2/#comment-2851165
Tue, 08 Oct 2013 17:09:53 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2215863#comment-2851165Don’t worry Bengals fans, we all know know matter what we do and who we beat, the Bengals will never get the love they deserve! Except from their fans!
]]>By: kowallazyhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/08/its-power-rankings-time-2/#comment-2850958
Tue, 08 Oct 2013 16:18:29 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2215863#comment-2850958As a Browns fan, I really wish I could drink enough kool-aid to rank my team that high. I really can’t, especially not back to Weeden. That said, it’s nice to see someone finally pulled the Falcons out of the elite bracket. Tons of power rankings keep clinging to the idea that the team is still elite when they’re very clearly not.
]]>By: harrybucsfanhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/08/its-power-rankings-time-2/#comment-2850941
Tue, 08 Oct 2013 16:14:43 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2215863#comment-2850941Florio, you crack me up. Your (dry/biting?) humor is the biggest reason I read your articles. Thank you.
]]>By: jessejames182http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/08/its-power-rankings-time-2/#comment-2850935
Tue, 08 Oct 2013 16:13:53 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2215863#comment-2850935Falcons being ranked lower than the Texans is an insult to Texans fans.
]]>By: t8ertothttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/08/its-power-rankings-time-2/#comment-2850934
Tue, 08 Oct 2013 16:13:45 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2215863#comment-2850934Bengals beat Patriots. Patriots ranked 7 spots ahead of Bengals. Makes total sense
]]>By: officialgamehttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/08/its-power-rankings-time-2/#comment-2850933
Tue, 08 Oct 2013 16:12:38 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2215863#comment-2850933The Chiefs are the flavor the month and shouldn’t be higher then 15th. This will be proven correct as the long season winds down.
]]>By: jdubb84http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/08/its-power-rankings-time-2/#comment-2850911
Tue, 08 Oct 2013 16:06:25 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2215863#comment-2850911I still think Seattle is better than Indy, they played back to back far road games and should have won that game.
]]>By: scaredhitlesshttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/08/its-power-rankings-time-2/#comment-2850863
Tue, 08 Oct 2013 15:57:24 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2215863#comment-2850863No love for Ohio?
]]>