Monday, May 14, 2012

I have some bad news for my republican Negro friends: None of you will be on the republican presidential ticket this year. The same might be true for women and Hispanics.

"Mitt Romney’s campaign is looking to fill its vice presidential slot with a “boring white guy,” according to one Republican who is privy to some details of the campaign’s decision.

Politico reports that Romney is trying his hardest to pick “a deliberate anti-Palin,” and apparently that means he cannot pick a person of color or a woman:

One Republican official familiar with the campaign’s thinking said it will be designed to produce a pick who is safe and, by design, unexciting – a deliberate anti-Palin. The prized pick, said this official: an “incredibly boring white guy.”

Of course, there are plenty of women and people of color who would be perfectly boring — and suitable — choices for Romney’s running mate: Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) is a crowd favorite, Louisiana Bobby Jindal (R) is about as boring as it gets, and there’s plenty of hubbub over Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH). But the objective of boring, white, and male shows that the Romney campaign will prioritize absolute vanilla-ness over the candidate who may be best for the job." [Source]

This sounds a little racist to me; why does a white guy have to be boring?
Anyway, I hope that Sarah Palin sees what she has done. She has made it hard for women and people of color to get another shot on the republican stage.

I would never try to tell a republican what to do. But Flipper, if you really want shake up this presidential race and increase your chances of beating his Oness come November, you would choose Condi Rice as your running mate. There is nothing boring about Condi. And she is quite competent to boot. But I get it, republicans, especially white male ones; do not associate women- especially women of color-with competence.

Finally, speaking of women of a certain color, I see that Usain Bolt decided to call it splitsville from his melanin challenged paramour. I sure hope that this had nothing to do with the backlash the speedy one got for choosing a white mate. He says that it's because he has to focus on training for the Olympics. I will take his word for it. But the timing of this break up is a little suspect. And apparently I am not alone in thinking that Usain might have caved to some yawdie backlash.

Hey, it might not be right, but believe me, I understand it. If Bolt had stayed in his relationship and he doesn't medal in London, that poor woman's life (not to mention his) would have been unlivable on the Island. I don't care if she is white, black, gold, or green.

76 comments:

Anonymous
said...

Boring? Boring? You want excitement? Try having a president that is making it so that many americans don't know when they are going to work again and sometimes eat next.

I want boring and competent, I'll put my own excitement in my life thank you very much. I want someone competent enough to do the job that there are no major scandals and weekly addressing bringing excitement and finger pointing to the table. The best leaders get things done and you don't even know they got them done.

Why the hell would Romney choose Condi when this race will be all about race. The whitest white man ever will point out how blah Barack is to get the racist vote. Condi? Really? I mean she's good at parroting Bush talking points but what if she left massa's plantation? Too much risk.My bet is Romney drags the Osmonds out of retirement to help his campaign "white is right".

Field, your trolls are no longer entertaining. They keep repeating the same tired talking points and dancing the same tired jigs. I thought you upgraded to the latest troll package.

good for that white chick. women women are 12 times more likely to be murdered by their black bf/husband than they are their white bf/husband.

Interesting stat. What resource did you get it from? That's another thing about these trolls, Field. They rarely bother to cite their statistics. I wouldn't want to think they were creating them out of whole cloth, now.

Then again maybe the righties have this one right. The Dems may have a plantation because there were actually blah people on plantations. I guess the more correct term I should have used to describe the GOP would have been Klan rally. Live and learn.

"Then again maybe the righties have this one right. The Dems may have a plantation because there were actually blah people on plantations. I guess the more correct term I should have used to describe the GOP would have been Klan rally. Live and learn."

Think "coal mine" or "workhouse," with those hapless folks surrounded by miles of poverty, company stores and a ring of armed Pinkertons. And they're grateful for being paid the same wages as a Chinese sweatshop worker.

hey Mack, makes you wonder how most white people are killed by fellow white people. From listening to racist whites the only folks you need to watch out for are us darkies. Oh well, gotta run got to find a white woman to rape and kill. (don't worry, I have Field on retainer so i'll get off and be back posting in no time).

White Women are 12.4 Times More Likely to be Murdered by a Black Husband Than by a White Husband

Of spouse homicides occurring from 1991 to 1999, 96.3 per cent occurred in intraracial marriages. Spouse homicides in marriages where the husband was Black and the wife was White constituted 1.4 per cent of the total, and marriages where the husband was White and the wife was Black accounted for 0.5 per cent. Spouse homicide incidence rates were 7.7 times higher in interracial marriages relative to intraracial marriages.

White women who marry a black husband increase their chances of being a victim of spousal homicide by 12.4 times.

In the report, “Fatal Violence among Spouses in the United States, 1976-85,” by James A. Mercy and Linda E. Saltzman, spousal homicide is examined along racial lines

Mack Lyons-"Field, your trolls are no longer entertaining. They keep repeating the same tired talking points and dancing the same tired jigs. I thought you upgraded to the latest troll package."

Mack, you are never satisfied. Field upgraded a week ago and here you come complaining like a whining Negro.

This package of anons is Anon Inc's B+ rating package guaranteed to excite FN Negroes like you and PilotX.

I offered Field the A+ package but he didn't want to pay the price. Field didn't want to pay that kind of money for folks like you, PilotX and Whitey.

Quite frankly, I don't blame him. Besides the A+ package contains anons with Einstein IQs. That's waaay beyond anything you and the rest of your FN regulars with your tiny brains could handle. They are just too bright for you. Therefore, Field decided not to waste his money.

Mack, in all sincerity, the B+ package is all YOU can handle. In fact, I'm thinking it's too much for YOU. BTW, where the hell have you been, chasing white girls like Bolt and Tiger? Be careful.

Field, "Hey, it might not be right, but believe me, I understand it. If Bolt had stayed in his relationship and he doesn't medal in London, that poor woman's life (not to mention his) would have been unlivable on the Island. I don't care if she is white, black, gold, or green."

You got it all twisted. Ursain needs that woman to win. Mark my words he is going to lose now because he has set up very bad karma in his life...just like Tiger. Besides, she was a woman who stood beside his sorry ass. Well, no more gold medals for Jamaica.

Mack Lyons said... Field, your trolls are no longer entertaining. They keep repeating the same tired talking points and dancing the same tired jigs. I thought you upgraded to the latest troll package.

When you say "repeating" do you mean by opening or including in most of your posts the same old line you use over and over and over and over "your trolls need an upgrade" or now that you saw someone use a new word "entertaining" you grabbed that and use it in a sentence without a point. You have to get a new schtick and a mind.

Wow, look there is white crime too so all the huge black crime is non-existant. My little brother used to use this tactic with our mother when we were 7.

So, which city do you think we should visit? Detroit? Birmingham? Clevelend? Which city in the U.S has a population where blacks do not lead the crime statistics no matter how small of a population they might be? Which one?

Field@11:46P-Brother Field I am surprised that you would stoop to such low tactics. I am so sad that you have become the "R" that you have been chasing for so long. I suppose it was inevitable...pray to be relieved of the cross of this burden.

If we question the unproven wite is rite...what else will we question? The pay of CEOs? Why we pay double or triple what eveel Socialismists countries do for health care...and get less? Whether the American Dream is a birthright...or available to all? Should we let businesses pollute...because some poofy haired actor said it was OK?

To Goober, Obama is the Wurst Prezndt Evah...because an African American played...and roundly trounced all the wites. And, most USians prefer him to the R brand.

little did I know I was singing Newt Gingrich's praises. I learn something new everyday from your trolls Field. Maybe they're not so bad afterall, no wonder you keep them around as pets. Kinda cute little guys huh?

PilotX said... little did I know I was singing Newt Gingrich's praises. I learn something new everyday from your trolls Field. Maybe they're not so bad afterall, no wonder you keep them around as pets. Kinda cute little guys huh?

Pets - just like the two squeegee airmen were. Maybe you can write your own legend as well and pretend you also aren't a fraud.

"So, which city do you think we should visit? Detroit? Birmingham? Clevelend? Which city in the U.S has a population where blacks do not lead the crime statistics no matter how small of a population they might be? Which one?"

Field you clearly misunderstood purposely. It is not what US city was completely free from a white instance of crime, it is which city anywhere no matter how SMALL the Black population, do blacks not lead in all crime statistics.

Ok lets look at your offerings:

Kentucky You say and list a incident of what to you is white crime. Let;s move that toothpick you offered aside and look at the forest.

Kentucky

In Kentucky, African-Americans are 7.8 percent of the population and 13.3 percent of poor people, but are responsible for 27 percent of homicide, 13 percent of rape, 44 percent of robbery, 28 percent of aggravated assault, and 19.3 percent of burglary.

can you imagine, most crime is committed by 17-25 year olds in every city, this means roughly less than 1% of Kentucky's population is terrorizing the state making it very likely that when you meet a black, they are criminals.

As for Pennsylvania, it was at this point I realized you are just playin the fool. Pennsyl. is in the midst of white flight experienced by Atlanta, Birmingham, Detroit and other largely black cities, all resulting from black crime and gangs of "youfs"

Who are you trying to kid? You know the media didn't "blackout" many incidents like the attack by the liberty bell, knockout king capital of the U.S, Oxford Circle home invasion, youfs attack of the cab driver in center city aww...whats the point you know Kill-a-delphia is out of control you are just being disengenious.

Hmmmmmmmmmm Field, maybe math is different in conservo world but since when is 27%, 13%, 44%, 28% and 19.4% a majority? Damn, these fools are even screwing up math. First science then history and now this. Sad day in 'merica when stupid is celebrated maybe that explains why Bristol has a show now. Anyhoo gotta go do some aggravated assaults and burglary since all of us do such things. Bill Cosby is waiting for me in the car.

"Sad day indeed Pilot X. And here I thought there was hope for the republic. "Mr Field, have you read "Suicide of a Super Power" by the esteemed Pat Buchanan? You should read and recommend it to your FN readers. Things don't look so good for America.

I think what "boring white guy" means is that they don't want anyone who would outshine the name at the top of the ticket. Not that that would be hard to do. But any one of the names you mentioned is more exciting that Romney. Condi Rice would be an awesome VP, but God's Own Party would never allow a woman, especially a woman of color, to be next in line for the presidency, even if she is one of their own. So Reps will have not one, but two boring white guys on their ticket this year. Business as usual.

Usain left her because he wanted the support from the JA people for the games. You can have a girlfriend and still focus on your training plus...he hasn't just now started to train for the 2012 olympics... so that's messed up. She deserve better!!! He had a girlfriend when he went to the 2008 olympics.. He dump her after the fame came so... he has been an foolish and an ass for years now...

as a black jamaican woman, it felt like a betrayal on the first reaction... but then i thought.. "this is Bolt, did you really expect anything different"?

So Bolt dumping anthoer girl for the cheers and fame...hey whose says lighting does strike twice in the same field

There are black pastors who are not gaybashers. But, the vast majority of black pastors gaybash so frequently and viciously that they make their mindless flocks truly believe that the emotional and physical murders of homosexuals are divine acts.

Now, some humane and sane black pastors are trying to whitewash the blackout of Prop 8. They are demonizing white gays for telling truths about gaybashing black voters. They are brazenly pretending that black gays are not being pimped AGAIN, just as George W. Bush pimped black preachers since 2000.

DON’T BELIEVE THE HOLY HYPOCHRISTIAN HYPE!!!

Most black churches exiled gays, and most black people bashed gays LONG before blacks sabotaged Prop 8, irrespective of any hair splitting over voter statistics...

The white media have ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with the evil that black gaybashers do. From black gay celebrities closeted with padlocks, to the global black serial killers who lynch black gays daily, to the hate filled sermons that black preachers spew from pulpits everywhere each day, blacks continue to PROVE that they are indeed the very worst gaybashers in the world!!!

why do they NEVER mention the beautiful lesbian and gay couples in the bible????david & jonathan/ruth and naomiditto for jesus and god who never said anything about ANY gays in the bible?????

why?????

The story of Sodom and Gomorrah has NOTHING to do with homosexuality. You will not even find the word “homosexual” in any version of this text. The angels came to destroy the city BEFORE they met the evil mob. Lot offers his virgin daughters to that same mob. Later, these same girls rape Lot. Lot’s wife was destroyed. If this story condemns homosexuality, then it also condones incest and gang rape. And, Lot’s wife was a lesbian. NONE of which is true.

From The Good Book: “The Hebrew verb “to know” is rarely used in a sexual sense. It occurs 943 times in the Old Testament and in only 10 of those does it have the sense of carnal knowledge. Sodom is referred to throughout the Old Testament as a place of wickedness and is synonymous with it. But, nowhere does it state that homosexuality was the wickedness in question...Sodomite refers almost exclusively to a male prostitute...to say that homosexual conduct is wrong because the bible says it is, is not to answer, but to dismiss the question....Sex can be productive without being reproductive. Homosexual rape is never to be condoned. It is indeed, like heterosexual rape, an abomination before God. David’s sin of adultery with Bathsheba does not make all heterosexual expressions sinful!”

From The Bible, Ezekiel 17:48-50: “The Lord says ‘Your sister Sodom’s sins were pride and laziness and too much food. While the poor and needy suffered outside her door, she insolently worshipped many idols as I watched. Therefore, I crushed her.’”

From What the Bible Really Says About Homosexuality: “The sin of Sodom was abuse and offense to strangers-insult to the traveler, inhospitality to the needy. The story is no more about sex than it is about pounding on someone’s front door. The bible offers NO valid conclusion whatsoever about homosexuality.”

3. Leviticus, Romans, and Corinthians all refer to “unnatural sex” for HETEROSEXUALS. It is NATURAL for HOMOSEXUALS to engage in homosexual sex.(Also see WHAT IS REAL SEX herein.) Yet, heterosexuals sin daily as gay prostitutes, porno film stars, lewd voyeurs, prison rapists, etc....

From The Good Book: “In Romans...Paul did not discuss gay persons but heterosexual people who performed homosexual acts. To suggest that Paul’s references to excesses of sexual indulgence, involving homosexual behavior, are indicative of a general position in opposition to same-sex eroticism, is as unfounded as arguing that his condemnation of drunkeness implies opposition to the drinking of wine. In Corinthians 1:7, Paul discusses the conjugal relations that ought to obtain between christian husbands and wives. For those whom celibacy was too high a price, he issued his famous edict that it was ‘better to marry than to burn’- not in hell. But with desire for the satisfaction of sex. Nowhere does he mention the sole purpose of such conjugality is the procreation of children.”

and we will NEVER live by any special rulesinside your cherry picked buybulls or anywhere else

u homohating sinners do not faze us

and u do not even know/study/read your own buybulls!!!!

. In Levitcus, homosexuality is an abomination not because it is inherently evil, but because the Gentiles do it. It is, therefore, ritually impure.

From What The Bible Really Says About Homosexuality: “Leviticus condemns sex as a religious crime of idolatry-not as a sexual offense. Romans suggest that sex acts have no ethical significance whatsoever. Corinthians and Timothy object to specific forms of male prostitution.These books do not refer to homosexuality. They make a general condemnation of moral looseness, lewd, lustful, and lascivious behavior.”

5. “Love Thy Neighbor” is a commandment. For the record, millions of your neighbors are homosexuals.

and we will NEVER live by any special rulesinside your cherry picked buybulls or anywhere else

u homohating sinners do not faze us

and u do not even know/study/read your own buybulls!!!!

. In Levitcus, homosexuality is an abomination not because it is inherently evil, but because the Gentiles do it. It is, therefore, ritually impure.

From What The Bible Really Says About Homosexuality: “Leviticus condemns sex as a religious crime of idolatry-not as a sexual offense. Romans suggest that sex acts have no ethical significance whatsoever. Corinthians and Timothy object to specific forms of male prostitution.These books do not refer to homosexuality. They make a general condemnation of moral looseness, lewd, lustful, and lascivious behavior.”

5. “Love Thy Neighbor” is a commandment. For the record, millions of your neighbors are homosexuals.

PilotX said... Hmmmmmmmmmm Field, maybe math is different in conservo world but since when is 27%, 13%, 44%, 28% and 19.4% a majority?

Two Squegee Airman proving again there really is an achievement gap.

Hey Pile it. Would you say if 1% of the population commits 27% of homicides, 13% of rapes, FOURTY FOUR% of robberies they are "Leading" in instance of crime? Would you? Do you understand the point? Here let me bell it down for you. If there are 10 people in the room, than someones left leg only, not even a full person is causing a hell of a lot of crime and "leading" you know - out in front, paving the path, showing the way, overachieving ahhhh ....now I get why you didn't understand. Never mind.

Kentucky

In Kentucky, African-Americans are 7.8 percent of the population and 13.3 percent of poor people, but are responsible for 27 percent of homicide, 13 percent of rape, 44 percent of robbery, 28 percent of aggravated assault, and 19.3 percent of burglary.

can you imagine, most crime is committed by 17-25 year olds in every city, this means roughly less than 1% of Kentucky's population is terrorizing the state making it very likely that when you meet a black, they are criminals.

I see math still eludes your trolls. Let's try a basic word problem. If 19.4% of a certain crime is committed by a certain group what percentage is left to be committed by toothless trailer dwelling hillbillies? My guess it's more than 50% which by definition is a majority.

PilotX said... I see math still eludes your trolls. Let's try a basic word problem. If 19.4% of a certain crime is committed by a certain group what percentage is left to be committed by toothless trailer dwelling hillbillies? My guess it's more than 50% which by definition is a majority.

Majority: a number greater than half of a total.

Field, I know your trolls are dumb but this is getting ridiculous.

Pilot, you are embarrasing yourself. Name calling won't make it any better, I can smell your nappy hair burning from here . Lets try this for the Bell ding-a-ling one last time.

Do you understand the difference between who "leads" in committing crimes by race and who commits the highest number of crimes by sheer volume of population? You are comparing bananas and watermelons and then not understanding why it won't click in your mind.

Try a few ingredients in your thought process that seem to be eluding you. Tiny population only 7.8% - very high crime rates for this itsy bitsy group. Lead - ahead of the pack (like that fitting choice of word pack? ) Lead - does more for it's representative group than any other group.

Have you been watching Al Sharpton must much you have resist you try too hard but cant think, yo?

Try hard, I know it is difficult, but maybe if you envision the words you may grasp the meaning and also not look like a ridiculous idiot who is actually trying to say that whites commit more crimes than any black population anywhere in the US or in fact the world -representative to the population. I mean no way you are actually sharptonish enough to think you can just stamp your feet change words and talk your way out of the reality of black violence and crimes do you?

I will put this into two squeegee terms so you can relate and maybe gits it.

Can you imagine you invite 8 black people to the party where 100 people were invited and they eat:

50 of the 100 chicken wings with hot sauce made for 100 people - just 8 people ate half the food meant for the whole group - 47% robberies. Not 50 people, not 40, not 30, Only 8 people ate half of the food.

Then those same 8 people ate 30 of the 100 watermelons meant for 100 people at the party - 27% percent homocides. 8 people ate almost four times more than they were supposed to have eaten and more than anyone else.

Then they kept going and ate 30 racks of ribs meant for 100 people at the party - Just 8 people ate enough food for 30 - Aggravated assault.

Now this is just Kentucky, in most other us cities, when black populations reach national averages of 12-13% leaving the 17-25 typical offender group at 2-3%or higher, the rates of crime disproportionately ballon grossly so.

Summing up, blacks being a small group of 7.5% total population in Kentucky - LEAD in crimes committed by race.

The consensus in modern scholarship is that homophobia is strongly associated with suppressed same sex attraction such that those who engage in extreme anti-gay agitation have an almost 1=1 probability of being closeted homosexuals themselves.

"In Kentucky, African-Americans are 7.8 percent of the population and 13.3 percent of poor people, but are responsible for 27 percent of homicide, 13 percent of rape, 44 percent of robbery, 28 percent of aggravated assault, and 19.3 percent of burglary."

Which means in normal people math 73% of homicides, 87% of rapes, 56% of robberies, 72% of aggravated assaults and 80.7% of burglaries are committed by non-blah people. Pretty damned sure not too many Latinos, Asians or Indigenous peoples running around Kentucky which means the vast majority (a number greater than half a total) is committed by white people. That tells me that your cousins (and hillbilly dating pool) really like raping and robbing. Interesting but not surprising.

PilotX said... "In Kentucky, African-Americans are 7.8 percent of the population and 13.3 percent of poor people, but are responsible for 27 percent of homicide, 13 percent of rape, 44 percent of robbery, 28 percent of aggravated assault, and 19.3 percent of burglary."

Which means in normal people math 73% of homicides, 87% of rapes, 56% of robberies, 72% of aggravated assaults and 80.7% of burglaries are committed by non-blah people. Pretty damned sure not too many Latinos, Asians or Indigenous peoples running around Kentucky which means the vast majority (a number greater than half a total) is committed by white people. That tells me that your cousins (and hillbilly dating pool) really like raping and robbing. Interesting but not surprising.

You have the brains of an ant. I hope they never trust you to do a manual load sheet with your sense of weight and balance.

TWEET ME

@fieldnegro

Follow the The Field Negro via e-mail.

DISCLAIMER

*COMMENTS, LINKS, AND CUT AND PASTE ARTICLES, ARE NOT ALL ENDORSED BY THE PUBLISHER.

THIS BLOG claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to its respectful owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

MORE DISCLAIMERS

***The views expressed on this site are the field's and the field's alone. They do not reflect the views of his employer, or any professional or legal organization with which he is affiliated.***

This is a commercial free blog.

Money is nice, but being able to speak my mind is better.

"Real talk: Daniel Rubin has a great little piece up wherein he chats with The Field Negro, the Philly-based blogger who sharply ponders all things black on a daily basis. (Seriously, if you’ve never checked in with TFN, you should: Its author, Wayne Bennett, is a fantastic read who can cut through bullshit like a hot knife through butter, which is a far grosser analogy than I wanted to make, but there you have it.)" ~Philebrity~

"One of the most precocious and hilarious Black political minds on the net. Ive been a long-time fan!" ~Asad Malik~

"..While most of what he writes is tongue-in-cheek, his space is a safe house for candid discussions about race, especially in the comments section, where people of all colors meet."~~Daniel Rubin, "The Philadelphia Inquirer"~~

"To white people, Bennett's musings are like kitchen-table talk from a kitchen they may otherwise never set foot in. To African Americans, he is part of a growing army of black Internet amateurs who have taken up the work once reserved for ministers and professional activists: the work of setting a black agenda, shaping black opinion and calling attention to the state of the nation's racial affairs."

~~Richard Fausset, "L.A. Times"~~~

"That's why I love the blog "Field Negro" so much. Field, as he's known to his fans, has the sense of reality that it takes to call out the (CowPuckey) of blame beating by those who are in positions of power and their lackeys. Because of his handle and his unabashed way of writing about racial issues, Field is often cited as a "Black blogger." What he is, however, is a first-class detector of blame deflection and an excellent student of history. If you want to write about the past and future of repression there's really no other perspective to take - which is why everyone should read Field."

FIELD NEGRO OF THE DAY.

(Magic) MAKING 100 MILLION DOLLARS AVAILABLE IN LOANS TO SMALL MINORITY OWNED BUSINESSES DURING THIS CRISIS IS FNB.

"Half a century after Little Rock, the Montgomery bus boycott and the tumultuous dawn of the modern civil rights era, the new face of the movement is Facebook, MySpace and some 150 black blogs united in an Internet alliance they call theAfroSpear.

Older, familiar leaders such as Rev. Jesse Jackson, Rev. Al Sharpton and NAACP Chairman Julian Bond, are under challenge by a younger generation of bloggers known by such provocative screen names as Field Negro, thefreeslaveand African American Political Pundit. And many of the newest struggles are being waged online."~Howard Witt-The Chicago Tribune~

"I had no idea, for example, of the extent of the African-American blogging world out there and its collective powers of dissemination.But now, after reading thousands of anguished, thoughtful comments posted on these blogs reflecting on issues of persistent racial discrimination in the nation's schools and courtrooms, what's clear to me is that there's a new, "virtual" civil rights movement out there on the Internet that can reach more people in a few hours than all the protest marches, sit-ins and boycotts of the 1950s and 60s put together." ~Chicago Tribune Reporter, Howard Witt~