If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Why is this a thing? Who would win between Chuck Liddell and the guy who played Al Bundy on Married With Children. Keep in mind that Al is a black belt in something or other, so I could make an shit argument about how he is an under rated war master who could realistically beat an mma legend too.

All manner of men came to work for the News: everything from wild young Turks who wanted to rip the world in half and start all over again -- to tired, beer-bellied old hacks who wanted nothing more than to live out their days in peace before a bunch of lunatics ripped the world in half.

Anyone who thinks Seagal would win is an idiot. No amount of biting, scratching, or eye-poking would save him from getting put on his ass by Randy. Hell, Randy could KO him without even taking him down.

I know it was already said, but it needs to be said twice, Steven Seagal is not a fighter. It could even be argued that he is not even an actor.

I don't think he's even a real person. He's a malfunctioning android that was originally built to take on chuck Norris. But when his creators saw how inept he was they sold him to Hollywood and he was used as an action star. Much like Arnold.