On Sep 22, 2011, at 11:26 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 15:52:43 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Ulrich Spörlein <uqs at spoerlein.net> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 12:14:38 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>>>>>> Just decided to follow the global trends and trying to throw all of my
>>>> local/private changes at you in hope that the "crowd-sourcing magic" might
>>>> somehow happen :-) This seems definitely easier than carefully producing the
>>>> patch files and keeping them up-to-date.
>>>>>>>> So, my newly cloned gitorious repository:
>>>>https://gitorious.org/~avg/freebsd/avgbsd>>>>>>>> And the first branch of interest:
>>>>https://gitorious.org/~avg/freebsd/avgbsd/commits/devel-20110915>>>>>> I'll throw mine in as well:
>>>>>>https://github.com/uqs/freebsd-head/branches>>>>> is that the same as tree as Fabien's, or a new snapshot ?
>>>> If not, couldn't we agree to have all the same tree in order to ease
>> code sharing between all of them ?
>>>> I see there is already a https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd tree,
>> which seem different than Fabien's tree on github. It really look like
>> The FreeBSD Project (https://github.com/freebsd/) is not able to
>> provide consistency.
>> The freebsd-head tree is the same that everybody in the world can get by
> simply running git svn clone against the FreeBSD subversion server
> (you'd need a lot of patience, though).
>> It's also available from git.freebsd.your.org and on code.google.com
> (except that Google's git backend sucks ass).
>> Fabien's tree is cut off at an arbitrary date and if you happen to
> choose a different date, well you cannot merge any branches with that
> repository.
No it was not cut at all it have been made at a time where github
dont allow large repo for free. All the branches >= 4.11 was in and
with full history from rev 1.
As Arnaud told me it seems at some point in time that at least
stable_8 branch was broken.
To be sure there is no other branches like this i've rebuilded
the repo and done a git push --force on Gitorious.
The effect of merge for people that use it is that git will not
successfully merge the tree as the history is not the
same (for stable_8 at least).
To solve that i've done:
git merge -Xtheirs upstream/svn_stable_8 on my reference branch
(that dont contain modifications). After that, merging from this
branch will be ok.
As more and more people use git i hope that at some point in
time we will have an official repo hosted on FreeBSD servers.
Fabien