Coming from Newsweek, you already know this has a left wing, Muslim-apologist slant along with disdain for anyone with the guts to challenge an ideology that is closer to a fascist dictatorship than anything resembling a religion. Instead of pleading for somebody to shut Wilders up, lest he offend more Muslims, the author might just as well have titled the piece, “Keep feeding the crocodile in hopes that he will eat you last.”

Christopher Dickey is the author and he describes himself as, “the Paris bureau chief and Middle East editor for Newsweek and The Daily Beast. Why am I not surprised? Fortunately, nobody in the Netherlands reads a magazine like Newsweek, with so few readers, it was sold to the only taker for $1.00 a few years ago. I shall refrain from my usual commentary, you already know what I’d say. I’ll just highlight in red, the words and lines from this erudite, elitist snob, that make my head explode and you can fill in the blanks.

A couple of years ago, a billboard appeared outside Columbia, S.C., looming above Interstate 26. Beady eyes stared out from a black balaclava emblazoned with an inscription from the Quran—clearly the eyes were meant to be those of a terrorist—and next to them were these words: “ISLAM RISING … BE WARNED.”

Erected by the Virginia-based Christian Action Network, the sign advertised the group’s documentary about a charismatic Dutch politician with dyed-blond hair, a mysterious past, and a platform of paranoid hate.South Carolina seemed to offer a ready audience for Geert Wilders’s dire warnings against the Muslim religion.

Today, with the Republican road show encamped in the state for the Jan. 21 presidential primary, the 48-year-old Dutchman is more than ever a man who needs to be watched and listened to carefully. At home in the Netherlands, his explosive theme of unrelenting hostility to Islam has built his ‘xenophobic’ Party for Freedom, founded in 2005, into the country’s third-largest political party; across the Atlantic his message packs serious resonance in an American heartland still shaken by the 9/11 attacks. Wilders’s name and message have been invoked repeatedly in South Carolina and at least a dozen other state legislatures as they debate measures to ban an imagined threat: Islamic law.

So does he worry about the violence his rants could inspire? Wilders is a master at capitalizing on real fears and conjuring false ones—and then dodging responsibility if people’s lives are ruined or lost. “I am responsible for my own actions and for nobody else’s actions,” he says. In a wide-ranging interview at the offices of the Dutch Parliament in The Hague, Wilders complained to Newsweek that the “naive” Obama administration wasn’t doing nearly enough to combat what Wilders regards as the Islamic threat. Expanding on his claims that the Quran should be banned, just as Mein Kampf has been in some countries, he said the United States should be “getting rid of Islamic symbols—no more mosques—and closing down Islamic schools.”

There’s no such thing as moderate Islam, Wilders insists, and he’s tired of hearing that radical Islam is something different from the mainstream faith. It means nothing to him that among Muslim believers there are many different sects and currents. “He makes no distinctions whatsoever,” says Robert Leiken, author of the just-published study Europe’s Angry Muslims.“He wants to throw out the whole Quran because of some things that are objectionable—but you could say the same thing about the Book of Joshua.” Wilders refuses to concede the point. In his view, those who follow the Quran are deluded or worse. “Totalitarian fascist ideology,” he calls it. “I have nothing against the people,” he says. “I have something against Islam.”

You start to wonder if Wilders really believes what he says or if he’s just staked out a position that suits him politically. The fight against Islam, he once told a protégé, is “our core business”—and Wilders has developed it for all it’s worth. His extremist stance often smells of cynicism and self-indulgence.

These days the country’s ruling coalition stands or falls at Wilders’s discretion. And his antipathy toward Islam goes so far that when Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands wore a headscarf during a royal visit to the Gulf monarchies last week, Wilders complained that the Dutch government should have stopped her.

Like many politicians who boast of their own candor, Wilders keeps much of his life and work in the shadows. Apart from the boilerplate official biography that says he was raised a Roman Catholic in the town of Venlo, there’s little on the record from him about his family background, and he flatly refuses to talk about it now.

As a teenager, Geert was almost out of control, his brother says. Much younger than his siblings (there are also two sisters), Geert was the spoiled baby of the family, and not much of a student. He quit school and went traveling, eventually finding himself in a Jewish farming settlement on the West Bank. After returning to the Netherlands he worked briefly for the state-run insurance system until he got bored and decided to try politics instead, starting out as a junior staffer with the country’s leading conservative party. Along the way, he visited Iran three times in the 1990s, once even finding it necessary to flee the country in fear for his life, according to his brother, who calls it “a true scare story.” Nevertheless, Paul says, nothing shaped the young man’s hostility toward Islam more than populist politicians in his home country.

In recent years Wilders has become something of a dabbler in U.S. politics, and he’s eager now to expand the market for Islamophobia. “I am working on an international kind of organization,” he told Newsweek. “The U.S. is so important to me, Europe is important. Canada—I was in Canada a few months ago. Australia. New Zealand.” His aim is to build an international organization, an “International Freedom Alliance,” as he calls it. Even so, he declines to name the U.S. politicians he likes—or those who favor him. He knows how toxic his reputation is. “If they were to be my friends, I probably would not help them by acknowledging it,” he admits.

As it is, Wilders-style anti-Islam rhetoric, only slightly modified, has long been echoed by the U.S. presidential hopefuls Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich, who have found it useful to paint previous opponents as weak on “radical Islam.” Back in 2010, Gingrich publicly issued a fatwa of his own against Islamic law: “I believe Sharia is a mortal threat to the survival of freedom in the United States.” Wilders says he has no contact with Gingrich. The two of them were scheduled to speak on the same platform on Sept. 10, 2010, to denounce the so-called Ground Zero mosque, but Gingrich didn’t show.

Wilders delivered the keynote address. He was in rare form as he denounced the purported evils of what had, in fact, been planned as a benign cultural center. “A tolerant society is not a suicidal society,” he warned. “It must defend itself against the powers of darkness, the force of hatred, and the blight of ignorance. It cannot tolerate the intolerant—and survive. This means that we must not give a free hand to those who want to subjugate us.”

Gingrich aside, Wilders has no shortage of influential and outspoken allies in America. When he was brought to trial last year in the Netherlands under the country’s hate-speech laws, he beat the charge with the help of American contributions to his defense fund. Conservative columnist and scholar Daniel Pipes assisted him, and has written of Wilders as “the most important European alive today.” The Atlas Shrugs blogger Pamela Geller positively gushes over Wilders in print, and posted a YouTube conversation with him she calls “the interview of the century.”

And Wilders’s incendiary documentary film Fitna, attacking the Quran as a manifesto for violence, was given a special screening on Capitol Hill in 2008, hosted by Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.). Wilders’s new book, Marked for Death: Islam’s War Against the West and Me, is due out in April from Regnery, publisher of books by Gingrich, Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham, and other right-wing provocateurs. Company president Marji Ross says she knows Wilders’s views are seen as extreme, but “that’s what makes the book exciting and bold and newsworthy.” The author says only, “It is written for the American market.”

Europe, however, is where Wilders continues to have the most influence—and where he raises the worst fears. Among the large and growing number of fire-breathing European politicians riding to prominence on waves of hostility toward mostly Muslim immigrants, Wilders has emerged as the most important—and some critics would say most dangerous—voice on the continent.

This xenophobic movement is often characterized as “radical right-wing,” but the actual situation is much more complicated than that. “These parties do not fit easily into the traditional political divides,” says a recent report from Demos, a British think tank that conducted an innovative study of 10,000 Facebook supporters of various European movements. “Formerly on the political fringes, these parties now command significant political weight in the parliaments of Austria, Bulgaria, Denmark, Hungary, the Netherlands, Sweden, Latvia and Slovakia, as well as the European Parliament.” In addition to the formal political parties, there are protest groups like the English Defence League in Britain and CasaPound in Italy, known for their ugly street fights.

Wilders himself is a mass of contradictions. He says he abhors violence, even though his diatribes undoubtedly have fired up many others who are out for blood. One admirer he’s at particular pains to disavow is Anders Breivik (“the lunatic,” Wilders calls him), the self-styled Crusader who went on a killing spree in Norway last summer, slaughtering 76 people before he quietly surrendered. In a 1,500-page anti-immigrant manifesto written before the rampage, Breivik referred to Wilders more than 30 times. Another example: although much of the relatively liberal European press depicts Wilders as promoting all sorts of racism and bigotry, the fact is he’s very particular about whom he hates. Whereas many of Europe’s anti-immigrant groups have long histories of anti-Semitism, Wilders refuses to be classed with crypto-Nazis, denouncing the British National Party, for instance, as “a blunt, racist, bigoted party—a terrible party.”

In fact, Wilders’s pro-Israel sympathies are so open, and his trips there have been so frequent, that some political enemies claim he’s backed by the Mossad. “It is all nonsense. I never worked for any secret service, certainly not the Israeli secret service,” he says. “It is too ridiculous to believe.” As for other sources of funding for his party, Dutch law does not require him to make the records public, so he doesn’t. “We are very poor,” he insists.

Wilders gets plenty of death threats. To him, they only prove how right he is. “Geert doesn’t seem to take responsibility for the potential consequences,” says his brother. “But I would add that with his growing support and popularity, he’s starting to believe his message.” Perhaps it’s time for another billboard: “WILDERS RISING … BE WARNED.”

Maybe someone will write the article “Can’t someone tell the Muslims to stop their antiWest diatribe before someone gets hurt?” Oh, that would be the Quran, so, no. After all,”Allah says…”
The Left always rail against the normative. It’s a childish kneejerk response instilled by leftwing professors as it was instilled in them by theirs. My question to them is “Will you rail against Islam if IT becomes the normative? No, you won’t. It won’t be allowed.”Then what? Might as well find another job, as disingenous dissident will be as welcome then as it is in Iran and Syria now. Just a couple examples, off the top.

I really like this outspoken ballsy Wilders who tells it exactly as it is. Of course, the politically correct morons and dhimmis alike hate his guts but who cares! I came to realize that if someone feels that strongly about you is -in the majority of cases- because you are doing the right thing that they are too gutless or plain ignorant/stupid to do themselves.

Him and Oskar Freysinger (instigator of Switzerland’s ban on minarets) are very well aware of the real threats these asslifters represent to us free Westerners, our cultures, laws, democracies etc. !

Freysinger too sticks to his guns and -I haven’t checked yet if there are subtitled versions out there as it is in French, but you should see the 8-parts video available on youtube of a TV debate that took place on the eve of the Swiss vote of the minarets ban, where Freysinger -of course- got dismissed and heavily criticized for this by the spineless liberals and the dangerous and despicable Tariq Ramadan (one language for *his kind*, one for us)!

Dismissed and laughed at for trying to prevent what’s happening/happened in most European countries to happen in Switzerland -you should hear the BS those bleeding hearts liberal-democrats come up with! Dismissed and laughed at when pointing out islam is not a race.

Same when he says: [Swiss] “people have the last word when it comes to passing laws, which isn’t the case with the muslims as they don’t have a democracy; it’s written somewhere in heaven and dicated to mohamed and it’s fixed, once and for all.”

To which Ramadan replied that Freysinger’s talking nonsense, may know how to read but reads very little, and on islam has practically read nothing. BS from Ramadan of course, because Freysinger has in fact read a lot -including Ramadan’s books- and is very well versed into all aspects of that cult’s ‘judicial system’!

Wilders, Freysinger and those who speak the same language are no doubt a real thorn in the side of the likes of CAIR. Good! And the more thorns the better!

“President of Holland”?! Hell, I’d like to see Geert Wilders replace our Asslifter-in-Chief in the USA, especially considering the fact that our Asslifter-in-Chief’s status as a “natural born citizen” or even a “native-born citizen” of this country is HIGHLY questionable!!….Just a few years ago, who would have believed that a traitorous Marxist and arselifter lover would be occupying the Oval Office!!…Sharia?!…Sharia Shit!!!!

It is very evident that mr. christopher dickey has no knowledge of the chronological kuran, and absolutely no knowledge of the hadiths, nor of the sunnah by which islam is ruled,,,
I hope his awakening is prior to the point of the sword being brought upon his neck~!
What is so saddeningly sickening is that the leftist idiocy thinks it is so intellectual and tries to be so understanding and tolerant, but never realizes that the focus of their forbearance has NO respect for that kind of courtesy~! Just as the evils, agenda and the methods of islam are beyond the comprehension of civilized humanity, so, too, are the norms of civilized humanity beyond the comprehension of islam and its devoted adherents~!
NO ideology that does not recognize LOVE as a cornerstone of human interaction can EVER coexist with ANY ideology or religion that DOES recognize LOVE as a prime tenet~!
Our dear mr. dickey has a lot to learn and assimilate in his life, and he’d better get the scales off his eyes in a hurry, or he may end up not having eyes to get those scales off of~!,,, and no, that is not a threat, but an admission of understanding of the enemy we all face, with some level of courage and yes, trepidation as well~!

What this snide imbecile and ignoramus Dickey fails to grasp in all his brilliance is that WILDERS IS LIVING THROUGH THE ISLAMIZATION OF HIS COUNTRY.

Dickey’s sitting in his little perch far from the problem, passing judgment on someone and something about whom and which he knows NOTHING. Parts of Holland are being destroyed quickly, BECAUSE OF MUSLIMS, you blithering, judgmental idiot!

But you don’t care about that – you could not care less that Wilders is trying to clean up this horrendous mess, which in itself is CAUSING VIOLENCE, moron. You don’t care about any of the victims of Islam in Europe or elsewhere, obviously. You aren’t putting your life on the line 24/7 to address these horrible ISLAM-RELATED problems, which are victimizing MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WORLDWIDE every day.

Nope, you are more concerned with someone who IS trying to stop the violence brought on the crazed Islamists in his midst.

There is nothing wrong with being a liberal in the true sense of the word. The word “liberal” comes from the Latin “librere” which means freedom.

Unfortunately so many who carry the liberal title are promoting a kind of tyranny all their own. Political Correctness is a kind of censorship as evil as the black tape brigade in Communist countries and ultra right wing groups who like to clip all the “juicy bits” in movies and video.

And so many liberals seem to be into this neo Marxist nonsense which is totalitarianism at its worst.

What planet has this guy from Newsweek been on? People get hurt and killed in the name of Islam all the time, often for very minor things, like being critical of Islam. Christians are lynched in Islamic countries for charges of “blasphemy.”

OT, but it looks like Hussein is going to assure that his Muslim brothers continue to get the oil money and that his “green” acolytes don’t take their votes elsewhere. Something to think about while the price climbs at the pump. Even if the Obamullah is voted out in November, it will be too late to save this pipeline.

I’ll roll out the red carpet in this country for Geert 24/7!!! I never cared about what people were till our government shoved these islamic, manipulating, lying, phony, back-stabbing, antagonistic, 7 century hating dick-faces down our throats.

The Newsweek writer being a typical liberal is weak and cowardly. He wouldn’t dream of writing the truth about muzzies from fear.Like the school yard coward that follows the bully around telling him what he wants to hear.

OK, this was London. Here in the U.S. the hotel or school would probably have cancelled the venue beforhand. Same thing, less direct confrontation. But later or, probably, sooner, this will happen in the U.S.

It has been asked by several people here and elsewhere exactly when may we be allowed to physically defend ourselves in the face of outright threats of violence from Muslims. The conference organizers here did the right thing, they called the police. And the event wound up cancelled anyway. Why was the Muslim Thug doing the filming not apprehended and his camera confiscated? Why was he not hauled before the magistrate and charged with threatening murder? Were the Goons in the mob outside detained? (I’d ask why enough police were not called to contain the mob, but we’ve all seen the vids from EDL demonstrations, etc., and know enough not to count on that.)

The Muslim Goon with the camera made direct threats of death against everyone in that audience and was backed up by a mob of Muslim Thugs outside. Would anyone here sit still and be assaulted and threatened by fanatic savages AND DO NOTHING? If when people have the experience of “feeling genuinely threatened and upset” by Muslim Thugs and Goons and do nothing even when the threats are verbal and no weapons are in play, what are we to expect next? And yes, it is the job of the police to protect our freedom of speech. But when the police refuse to do so, what alternatives are left?

(Eccl. 3:1) Verses 2 through 8 also mention there are times for war, peace, love, hate, and “A time to cast away stones, and a time to gather stones together . Guess we know where we fit in these times. Patriots sun is riseing.

Now Dickey lives in Paris. Yet with his dhimmi blinders on, he sees nothing. He does not see the Muslims taking over the streets to pray. He does not see the ‘yutes’ burning cars. He does not see the persecution of the infidels. He does not see the Muslim gangs terrorizing the infidels and robbing the state and its citizens blind. NO, it is best to ignore such contradictions and continue to live in his phony world where Islam is not a problem.

1) Speech in defense of your culture from a hostile invasion is a “diatribe”.

2) No one has gotten hurt yet.

3) The desire to defend yourself against extreme danger in the form of millions of invaders sworn to annihilate you is evidence of “paranoia and hate”.

4) The desire to preserve your way of life from total destruction by Muslim berserkers is “xenophobia”.

5) The encroachment of Islamic law is an “imagined threat”

6) Geert Wilders is a madman trying to export “Islamophobia.” His reputation is “toxic”.

7) Islam is good. Reacting negatively to Islam is bad.

This article is a treasure, a premier example of absolutely pitch-perfect Marxist propaganda. It deserves to be read over and over again, unpacked phrase by phrase. I’m hanging on to this one. It’s going into the files as a teaching aid.

I’ve never heard of Christopher Dickey, but I’m going to remember that name. He’s no boiler-room envelope stuffer. This guy is the heartbeat of Marxist indoctrination and slander. He has more than mastered his craft.

He punches, claws and bites his helpless target over and over again, with such unvarnished bias and hate, you can be sure the top Marxists consider Wilders a real threat to their agenda. Thus, the greater incentive to rally around him with redoubled zeal.

This article was clearly a top assignment for an elite operative right out of the Frankfurt School – a commissioned hit from the Central Committee. With Geert Wilders’ reputation as a hero spreading like wildfire beyond Europe, the Marxists have determined to destroy him. Thus, their vicious attempt to “familiarize” Americans who don’t know him yet so if they hear his name in the future they can nod in false recognition and congratulate themselves for being “up on current events” by “knowing” about that guy – a European David Duke, right? Then they can take whatever he or his followers say as a negative barometer and melt away in the other direction like thoughtless amoebas moving from darkness toward light – yet unwittingly doing the reverse.

This is what it looks like when the Marxists introduce one of their targets to you. (They couldn’t even resist awkwardly reaching into his personal “history” for an ad hominem attack.) This is the first impression they want “him” to make.

Can there be any doubt who is behind the intellectual disarming of the West and the Islamic wave of destruction? Muslims are so offensive they wouldn’t have a chance without the Marxist spin. You have to be conditioned to think “fair is foul and foul is fair” first – and that’s right up the Frankfurt School’s alley – literally. They’ve perfected this. The only thing that changes is the subject to which they apply it.

Yes, indeed! The Cultural Marxist fingerprints are all over the sabotage of the West “by Islam”. With a wink to the conscious insiders, this Communists propaganda article virtually takes credit for the Global Jihad on behalf of Leftists.

The sort of cowardice, careerism, dhimmitude, Islamophilia, and general libtard derangement demonstrated by Christopher Dickhead here against Geert Wilders, a man of real courage and uncorrupted understanding of what is happening to Europe is, in times of war, defined as COLLABORATION WITH THE ENEMY.

Wilders’ truth-telling will result in violence from a “peaceful” people? Wilders is pro-Israel? Blame it on the Joooooooos, then. Islamic law is an “imagined threat” — has this tool even read the tenets of Sharia? No, of course he hasn’t. He doesn’t need to do research on first source documentation, he can just read what OTHER libtard tools have said about it. He leaves that source-checking stuff to us “right-wing provocateurs”.

Or he runs it by the THUGS and GOONS at CAIR, who will tell him what he wants to know, and he can pass it on as facts when in truth it is nothing but taqiyya b.s.

Dickhead is about as useful as his TIME counterpart Klein who was telling everyone last year that the mobs of Muslim Brotherhood thugs in the streets of Cairo were Arab Springers calling for Jeffersonian democracy. The crocoshidile of Islam won’t eat these tools last — they will long before then have donned their own crocodile costumes and bowed down to the great scaly croc king Allah.

Blaming Geert for Muslim violence is like the “Joke” about domestic abuse:’ What do 10,000 battered housewives have in common? They don’t listen.” No I don’t think that joke is funny, outside the fact that it is so outrageous to blame the victims for the abuse of their attackers. Such it is with blaming Geert, OR ANYONE ELSE for the violence that is ISLAM, except for Muslims. Same joke, different context.

GET THE DOCUMENTARY, TAKE TO SHOOLS, UNIVERSITIES CHURCHES DON SLEEP AMERICA!!! HEROS ARE THERE LIKE HIM BUT PROSECUTED BY COMMUNIST-MARXIST GOV.. CHURCHILS ARE THERE JUST LISEN AND YOU WILL HEAR THEIR VOICES

This Christopher Dickey guy, for all his seeming smarts, sure is ignorant about the real nature of islam and it’s increasingly aggressive hostility towards the governments and peoples of the European lands they’ve settled in. Not a day goes by now that one can see and read about provacative and supremist behaviors, from taking over entire streets to pray, to flashing posters claiming that islam will rule the world or so and so must be beheaded for his/her “insults” of islam, to the murdering of Christians or/and destruction of their churches and other properties.

Nun-muslims have been getting hurt, killed, displaced for years, and that is why there are people like Wilders stepping up and telling it like it is, that enough is enough. It’s time to fight back. There is going to be a war, Mr. Dickey, and it will be mostly, MOSTLY due to muslim behavior. Wake up and smell the coffee, Chris. While you still have a head on your shoulders.

A rite of passage, anything having to do with the truth, as many see it, is a no-no in our modern political enviroment. Wilder is a man of truth, and the establishment wishes to keep this truth silent til such time as there are sufficient block of political enemies available for the picking to create their one world. While it is true, and a god thing, this publication has about as much clout as the next red herring, they have already lost the information war against their hostility towards any Representative Republic and this article just confirms to most of their particular leanings, lemmings, stupid lemmings willing to take the fall right off the clif with the others who risk being marked for the slaughter coming their way. I ask where is NewsWeek in regard to the destruction of their prefered one man wreaking crew, obama’s bin ly’n, where? It’s easy to extrack concesssions from the guilty but I have to wonder where this author will be in the next wave of violence awaiting him and his views of the religion of pieces. I would recommend he steer clear of the flyover country, we don’t much cotton up to traitors here in the neck of the woods and have even less tolerances for liars.

Could the METAMEME destroy Islam from within? I realise Richard Dawkins isn’t everyone’s favorite polemicist, but the idea of using one virus to protect against a more lethal virus (like cowpox against smallpox) has a certain attraction…

“One interesting question is whether the meme theory is itself a meme (‘The Metameme’) and whether its spread could block and give immunity to more pernicious memes.

If you are a sexually repressed teenager, who suddenly realises that the promise of 72 virgins for killing kuffars is nothing more than a mechanism for a mind-virus to ensure its dominance over competing memes, by eliminating their carriers, then you may be less enthusiastic about blowing yourself and fellow passengers to pieces in a train or bus.

In fact, maybe most of the top Death Cult franchisees have sussed out that their murderous mumbo-jumbo is in fact mind-parasite, because they never blow themselves up or get their own kids to blow themselves up. It’s always some poor gullible adolescent.” http://rational-buddhism.blogspot.com/2012/01/metameme.html

Allah said: “fight them”,”fight those who”, “fight those of the disbelievers nearest you”, “urge the believers to fight”. Moe said “I am commanded to fight” & “I have been made victorious with terror”.

The big yellow river ‘journalists’ are to stupid, ignorant, bigoted & arrogant to read Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence to discover the truth for themselves.

I am speechless. So many bare-faced lies. All faschistic ideologies, like Nazism and Islam, accuse their opponents of their own faults. If only Geert could become the president of Holland, he could do so much good in the world.
I cannot understand why people choose slavery instead of freedom — the wages of socialism and totalitarianism are clear to see in the pages of history — one tyrant and 50 million voiceless slaves. People have always tried to escape from these inhuman traps — now some idiots want to bring Communism back, especially the Leftist Party in Germany. Whx don’t they learn the lessons of history?
How blessed we are to have someone like Geert Wilders, who sacrifices his personal life to try to rescue Freedom for human beings. Why aren’t there more champions of his courage and insight? Why are the leaders of the so-called Free World
afraid to call Islam the spade it is?
May God continue to protect and smile upon Geert, and may he gather political strength
and make inroads into the tainted thinking of Europe’s deluded leaders.
Godspeed, Geert.

Therese: Do you know the actual dates etc.? I believe this man of principal has rubbed the noses of Americans in their own embarrassed, that a European has shown more balls for Freedom and Liberty than many American’s bar Allen West, who should be their next President if it weren’t due to his late entry into American politics. Islam is the problem! It will be contained by law or civilian action.