China and the Dragon Tail of Marx

The dragon tail of Marx’s end-game of overcapacity and finance capital is about to shred China’s fantasy that the state can micro-manage both capitalism and financialization with no contradictions or consequences.

Longtime readers know my one expertise is annoying the entire ideological spectrum in 1,000 words or less. Today is one of those days, so strap on your blood pressure monitor and prepare for full-spectrum annoyance, regardless of your ideological leanings.

Marxism is typically considered discredited outside of a few protected fiefdoms of academia which tend to engage in obscure debates over the labor theory of value and other signifiers of membership in the inner circle of deep Marxist thinkers.

Outside these cloistered academic circles, Marxism is dismissed for two basic reasons:

1. the predicted final crisis and implosion of capitalism did not occur

2. the vaguely outlined post-capitalist incarnation of a stateless worker’s paradise not only failed to materialize, but was used to justify destructive, murderous totalitarian regimes.

But those egregious failures of Marxist theory should not blind us to the value of his critique of capitalism. After all, he was writing in the first stages of industrialization and global finance (late 19th century), and his failure to detail a scientific socialism beyond capitalism can be chalked up to a mix of naive idealism and a paucity of theoretical models to build on.

Ironically, the one successful state that claims to be founded on Marxist principles, China, is poised to prove his analysis of capitalism’s implosion was fundamentally sound. Consider two major parts of Marx’s analysis of capitalism:

1. the consequences of overcapacity and competition

2. the dominance of finance capital over industrial capital

Marx foresaw that the consequence of overcapacity and competition is the collapse of profits which leads to the collapse of wages and most competitors. If there is any single word that defines China now, it’s overcapacity.

This is not a new dynamic; when I first visited China in 2000, the TV set industry was already suffering from overcapacity/overproduction and a resultant collapse of profits.

What can any enterprise do when competition and overcapacity slash profit margins to near-zero? Slash payrolls and wages. Profit margins are famously razor-thin in most Chinese industries, and despite wages that are a fraction of U.S./E.U. wages, automation of production lines is the only solution to Chinese companies beset by fierce competition and overcapacity in their sector.

Automation only provides a brief competitive advantage, as one’s competitors are busy lowering their input costs by automating production.

Marx understood that the end-game of overcapacity is a reduction of capacity via bankruptcy and the establishment of competition-killing monopolies. This is the stage of collapse that lies just ahead for the majority of Chinese industrial players.

The equally devastating parallel implosion of factory jobs will crush demand. The social safety net in China is threadbare compared to the West; laid off workers get little compensation or retraining; most face a return to rural villages and subsistence incomes from farm work that have dwindled to a few hundred dollars a year as a result of state policies that have made food cheaper for poor urban workers.

If there is any major economy that demonstrates the dominance of finance capital over industrial capital, it’s China. The entire boom since the global financial meltdown in 2008 has been financed by cheap credit, leverage and speculative lending in an opaque shadow banking sector.

Compare China’s bank assets with those of the U.S., which has an economy of roughly the same size:

It doesn’t matter whether the banks are owned by the state or not; the net result is the same: massive malinvestment as productive investment is abandoned in favor of speculation.

If any nation is poised to reap the consequences of rampant financialization, it’s China.In the global downturn that’s just starting, China won’t be able to boost capacity as a solution–the economy is already being crushed by overcapacity in virtually every sector.

It also can’t turn to the financialization save of unlimited expansion of credit and dodgy leverage–financialization has already been pushed to the redline. there is nothing left except diminishing returns on additional expansions of credit and leverage.

Marx is about to demolish the fantasy in China that financialization can be controlled by the state. Losses can be covered over and the next expansion of credit is just around the corner. Nice, but credit doesn’t create jobs lost to overproduction, nor does it generate profits, nor does it generate collateral for the next round of shadow banking speculation.

What Marx did not foresee is the critical role of the state in enforcing private monopolies and the predations of financialization. While Marx understood the parasitic nature of Monopoly Capitalism, he did not anticipate the State’s partnering with Cartel/Crony Capitalism. In effect, the Chinese State is now so dependent on financialization that it stripmines the citizenry to protect the financial sector from the consequences of their business model (excessive credit, leverage, fraud, embezzlement and the misrepresentation of risk). But the Chinese State doesn’t merely enable the predation of its crony financiers; it also stripmines the citizenry to fund its own expansion into every nook and cranny of civil society.

The dragon tail of Marx’s end-game of overcapacity and finance capital is about to shred China’s fantasy that the state can micro-manage both capitalism and financialization with no contradictions or consequences. “Dragon Seeks path. Dragon whips his tail.” The dragon of capitalism isn’t as easy to control as bureaucrats expect.

“But the Chinese State doesn’t merely
enable the predation of its crony financiers; it also stripmines the
citizenry to fund its own expansion into every nook and cranny of civil
society.” This statement is nonsense. Are you implying, Smith, that the
“Chinese State” (the CPC) was not already expanded into “every nook and
cranny of civil society” since the Party seized control under Mao? You are not looking at laissez faire capitalism in China, Smith. What you see is the planned development of a modern market economy in a backward nation. You are not looking at 19th Century American capitalism and its chronic overproduction, which is what you describe in this essay. You are not even looking at “capitalism with Chinese characteristics”. You do not seem to understand, Smith, that financiers and markets are not in control of China, as they are here. The CPC is in control. The CPC has promoted the development of “socialism with Chinese characteristics” as a prelude to true communism, which involves the evolution of capitalist activity in a market economy. But none dare call it capitalism. What you see is socialism. The economic boom initiated by Deng is an experiment. The CPC can alter this experiment when it begins to get too much out of hand. Shanghai millionaires do not dictate policy as Wall Street does here. Keep in mind that China is a socialist dictatorship, Smith.

ClubToTheHead

Overcapacity is the reason capitalist governments need
expansion into foreign markets. Without exports, overproduction leads to
production stoppages and the profit motive fails.

Production, as Marx observed, is still possible without profit, but it is no
longer capitalism. That means the freeloaders who live on the products of the
material producers will have to find other means of exploitation and will rely
on the capitalistic government to prevent their expropriation by those deprived
of life’s necessities by the capitalist government’s laws.

Capitalism did collapse in the US in 2007- 2008. Like the Roadrunner of cartoon
fame, the capitalist government has run off a cliff, although this sight has
been obscured from public vision by government propaganda and intervention.
Instead of making a trillion dollar coin out of stone, the Fed has redeemed
valueless paper mortgages of stone’s value, as assets on the electronic ledgers
of the banksters.

Auto manufacturers have failed to make a profit through industrial capitalism,
in compliance with Marx’s declining rate of profit theory, and are being kept
afloat by their incorporation of finance capitalism within the previously industrial

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, economic, scientific, and educational issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: