International Criminal Justice - Essay Example

Extract of sampleInternational Criminal Justice

There are no guidelines that can serve societies that have endured a governing process that included crimes against humanity and gross abuses f human rights, but that are currently making a democratic transition based on constitutionalism and respect for the individual. Fashioning an appropriate approach is rendered more difficult to the extent that the former regime voluntarily gave up power as part f a bargain with the democratic opposition, and yet remains on the scene, even continuing to control the armed forces and internal police apparatus. The Southern Cone countries f Chile and Argentina pose this challenge in its sharpest possible form, but the same type f issue is posed for many other countries, including South Africa and several Central American countries.
The complexity f this challenge has been widely revealed over the course f the last year or so by the controversy surrounding the arrest f the former Chilean dictator, Augusto Pinochet. At issue most fundamentally is whether international standards governing the accountability f leaders takes precedence over the implementation f a national bargain in Chile, giving Pinochet effective immunity, and even a position f Senator for Life. Extending law to govern crimes f state has more generally resurfaced in this period as a result f the end f the Cold War, and even more so, the human abuse arising from the break-up f the former Yugoslavia during the course f the 1990s.
For one thing, a special criminal tribunal has been established at The Hague with authority over such allegations, as well as a parallel effort arising from the genocidal events that occurred in Rwanda in 1994. As well, through a transnational coalition f NGOs in collaboration with a series f governments, the Rome Treaty was signed in 1998 with the goal f establishing a permanent international criminal court. (Dammer 2006, 100-102)
How can we explain this resurgence f intergovernmental interest in criminal accountability for political and military leaders acting under the authority f their respective sovereign states The impulse to impose such responsibility originated in a half-hearted way after World War I, with the Versailles Peace Treaty recommending a criminal prosecution f Kaiser Wilhelm and a duty for Germany to carry on against lesser figures in a special court established at Leipzig. These initiatives came to nothing, the Kaiser finding asylum in nearby Holland, and the Leipzig trials exhibiting Germany's lack f political will to punish its own nationals.
International involvement between nations is not new. (Grotius 1853, 1-7) The twentieth century, however, has seen an incredible increase in the number and variety f international organizations, including the failed League f Nations f the 1920s, other post World War I agreements, and the United Nations and Bretton Woods agreements following World War II. The second half f the century has seen a virtual explosion f governmental and non-governmental organizations operating in the world arena. (Weigend 2002, 1232-1242)
Despite the phenomenal growth f international cooperation and interdependency, the world is increasingly less humane. Conflicts generating Nazi-like atrocities have increased since the end f that regime, (Brown 1999, 10-11) as exemplified by ethnic
...Show more

Summary

In this paper the writer has discussed in detail the theory and principles f International Criminal Justice with its historic background. The paper will evaluate international treaties signed for the criminal justice system and focus on the procedure f international criminal court…

Related Essays

Sometimes this evidence is excluded. In the words of The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 78, evidence is excluded if “having regard to all the circumstances, including the circumstances in which the evidence was obtained, the admission of the evidence would have such an adverse effect on the fairness of the proceedings that the court ought not to admit it.” This is similar to section 24(2) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

This is done on the basis of suspicion, conviction, or legal punishment by court. Variety of jurisdictions has different laws that govern the functionary of incarceration in a broader mechanism of justice.

This essay will thus require the discussion of war crimes and wars of aggression in the context of the international law and its limits in allowing the use of force at and international and national level. The necessary themes in this context will include a discussion of the general doctrine of non intervention and then go on discuss the legal aspects of the use of armed force and how the world peace and security legislation prevents and regulates such behaviour by a state.

This assertion, however, raises a host of questions. For instance, if American soldiers operating in other countries had been conscious of the ethics of duty, they would have realized that they could discharge their duties without prejudice to ethical norms which they clearly violated through merciless treatment even of those not pronounced guilty of all the crimes laid at their doors; and if they had been aware of the ethics of use, they would have exhibited restraint in the use of force where it was not called for.

Beforehand he has contributed in several International justice-associated developments as the Director of the International Justice Program of the Lawyers Board for Human Rights in New York, together with Rome Diplomatic Conference taking place at the ICC.

political scientist John Burton and yet the statement presents the very opposite of what is happening in the world of international humanitarian law today. This essay will thus require the discussion of war crimes and wars of aggression in the context of the international law

Sometimes this evidence is excluded. In the words of The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 78, evidence is excluded if “having regard to all the circumstances, including the circumstances in which the evidence was obtained, the admission of

Variety of jurisdictions has different laws that govern the functionary of incarceration in a broader mechanism of justice. In the United States, many people think that the process of incarceration of offenders is the most appropriate