Paul Thomas Anderson's latest may lack the visceral intensity of There Will Be Blood, but it is the fluid, evocative work of a filmmaker in his prime.

The Weinstein Company

The Master, Paul Thomas Anderson's elegant, evocative, and enigmatic new film, opens with a shot of deep blue waters churning into egg-white foam. A flood-swollen river, perhaps? The spumed base of some remote falls? When the shot recurs later in the film, we will discover it to be of the wake of a ship--two different ships, in fact, at two moments in time. But the meaning of the image will long since have become clear: volatility and flux, rootlessness and unrest.

In short order we are introduced to the human embodiment of these traits, Freddie Quell (Joaquin Phoenix), a Navy seaman in the Pacific theater during the closing days of World War II. We watch Freddie, prematurely creased and frayed, as he siphons shots of rocket fuel to allay his alcoholism; we watch as he feigns copulation with the sand sculpture of a naked woman his shipmates have carved into the beach, then follows up his performance by masturbating into the surf.

These compulsions, carnal and pharmacological, continue to define Freddie after war's end. Plagued by PTSD, he is presented with Rorschach blots: "a pussy," he responds, "a cock going into a pussy," "a cock, but upside down." When he takes a job as a department store portrait-taker, he screws a shop-girl in the darkroom and mixes himself cocktails from his photographic chemicals. Fired from the job for drunkenly assaulting a customer, he finds work as a cabbage picker, where his ever-more-toxic intoxicants almost kill a fellow laborer. Desperate, half-conscious, he clambers one night onto a party yacht about to weigh anchor.

Related Story

The vessel belongs to—or, as we later learn, is being borrowed by—Lancaster Dodd (Philip Seymour Hoffman), a genial if self-serious walrus of a man who humbly allows that he is "a writer, a doctor, a nuclear physicist, a theoretical philosopher." Dodd, who throughout the film is referred to almost exclusively as "master," is the leader of a small but ardent creed called the Cause, the tenets of which are one part science, two parts mysticism, and three parts Edgar Rice Burroughs. (Dodd and the Cause are based on L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology in ways that are telegraphically evident though, one assumes, not legally actionable.)

Dodd finds himself fascinated by his visibly imploding stowaway. "You'll be my guinea pig and protégé," he tells Freddie—an ironic choice of words given that the Cause (like Scientology) is adamant that "man is not an animal." Freddie undergoes psychological "processing" (read: "auditing") to unearth past trauma and, like a prodigal son, moves in with Dodd and his wife, Peggy (Amy Adams). The two men become inseparable, even sharing adjacent cells when they are both arrested—Dodd for fraud, Freddie for assaulting the officers sent to carry out the warrant. The scene of the two in jail is an immaculate juxtaposition, Dodd standing by placidly as Freddie gnaws at his mattress and kicks his toilet into porcelain splinters.

Its unbalanced title notwithstanding, The Master is a film of such dualities, in which Anderson commits more fully to the themes with which he toyed intermittently in the characters of Daniel Plainview and Eli Sunday in There Will Be Blood. Freddie is the wild expression of Dodd's measured will, his pet and his patient, follower and foil. Yet this neat polarity is just as neatly undermined: Freddie craves the yoke even as he casts it off; Dodd's fetish for self-composure belies a temper only marginally less combustible than Freddie's.

Addiction and obsession are by nature repetitive, and 'The Master' accordingly feels caught in a feedback loop.

In its craftsmanship and nuance, The Master bears the all the self-assurance Anderson has shown since he exploded into cinematic prominence with Boogie Nights at age 27. Like that film, like Magnolia, like There Will Be Blood, Anderson's latest is at once expansive and intimate, an exploration of an era—the vast yet uncertain promises of the early postwar years—and an exercise in meticulous portraiture. The period details (production design by David Crank and Jack Fisk, costumes by Mark Bridges) are dreamlike yet exact; the score, by Jonny Greenwood, mesmerizing; and Mihai Malaimare's cinematography, shot in lush 70mm, vibrant and seductive.

Worthy performances in his past notwithstanding, Phoenix is a minor revelation as Freddie, an animal caged in human flesh—or alternatively, as the Cause would have it, a pure soul poisoned by a million years of accumulated trauma. Hoffman (whose performance in Magnolia may have been the most underrated of his career) makes for a magnificent mountebank, his belief stretched a mile wide and an inch deep. ("He's making all this up as he goes along," Dodd's son, expertly played by Jesse Plemons, explains to Freddie.) And Adams, as the latest in Dodd's series of wives, is unerring as the steel beneath his velvet, the firm, genuine fervor undergirding his ego and hucksterism. Characteristically wonderful, too, is Laura Dern, in a smaller role as one of Dodd's acolyte/benefactors.

For all its virtues, though, The Master lacks the searing intensity of There Will Be Blood and the scope and ambition (not always fully realized) of Magnolia. Once Dodd and Freddie have assumed their complementary roles, the film becomes, to some degree, an iterative exercise, variations on a theme. The two dancers, gifted and subtly choreographed, advance and retreat in tempo: id and superego, yin and yang, annihilating chaos and a pretense of order. Where There Will Be Blood transmuted sullen earth into flame and launched it violently skyward, The Master is, as its opening shot advertises, a more fluid undertaking, a story of ebb and flow.

If this structure is at times a disappointment, it would be wrong to label it a flaw. Addiction and obsession are by nature repetitive, and if The Master at times feels caught in a feedback loop, it is by no means clear that the cycles are unintended. In this the film resembles Freddie himself, the inevitable recidivist, who is at one point commanded to spend days (weeks?) marching back and forth across an ordinary living room, alternately touching wall and window, seeking an epiphanic release that will never arrive. Anderson's film is more meditative than analytic in its mood and purposes, but if it has a lesson to offer it is perhaps this: that constant motion is itself a kind of stasis, the last trap of a wandering soul, the endless wake of a boat to nowhere.

About the Author

Christopher Orr is a senior editor and the principal film critic at The Atlantic. He has written on movies for The New Republic, LA Weekly, Salon, and The New York Sun, and has worked as an editor for numerous publications.

Most Popular

His paranoid style paved the road for Trumpism. Now he fears what’s been unleashed.

Glenn Beck looks like the dad in a Disney movie. He’s earnest, geeky, pink, and slightly bulbous. His idea of salty language is bullcrap.

The atmosphere at Beck’s Mercury Studios, outside Dallas, is similarly soothing, provided you ignore the references to genocide and civilizational collapse. In October, when most commentators considered a Donald Trump presidency a remote possibility, I followed audience members onto the set of The Glenn Beck Program, which airs on Beck’s website, theblaze.com. On the way, we passed through a life-size replica of the Oval Office as it might look if inhabited by a President Beck, complete with a portrait of Ronald Reagan and a large Norman Rockwell print of a Boy Scout.

Should you drink more coffee? Should you take melatonin? Can you train yourself to need less sleep? A physician’s guide to sleep in a stressful age.

During residency, Iworked hospital shifts that could last 36 hours, without sleep, often without breaks of more than a few minutes. Even writing this now, it sounds to me like I’m bragging or laying claim to some fortitude of character. I can’t think of another type of self-injury that might be similarly lauded, except maybe binge drinking. Technically the shifts were 30 hours, the mandatory limit imposed by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, but we stayed longer because people kept getting sick. Being a doctor is supposed to be about putting other people’s needs before your own. Our job was to power through.

The shifts usually felt shorter than they were, because they were so hectic. There was always a new patient in the emergency room who needed to be admitted, or a staff member on the eighth floor (which was full of late-stage terminally ill people) who needed me to fill out a death certificate. Sleep deprivation manifested as bouts of anger and despair mixed in with some euphoria, along with other sensations I’ve not had before or since. I remember once sitting with the family of a patient in critical condition, discussing an advance directive—the terms defining what the patient would want done were his heart to stop, which seemed likely to happen at any minute. Would he want to have chest compressions, electrical shocks, a breathing tube? In the middle of this, I had to look straight down at the chart in my lap, because I was laughing. This was the least funny scenario possible. I was experiencing a physical reaction unrelated to anything I knew to be happening in my mind. There is a type of seizure, called a gelastic seizure, during which the seizing person appears to be laughing—but I don’t think that was it. I think it was plain old delirium. It was mortifying, though no one seemed to notice.

Why did Trump’s choice for national-security advisor perform so well in the war on terror, only to find himself forced out of the Defense Intelligence Agency?

How does a man like retired Lieutenant General Mike Flynn—who spent his life sifting through information and parsing reports, separating rumor and innuendo from actionable intelligence—come to promote conspiracy theories on social media?

Perhaps it’s less Flynn who’s changed than that the circumstances in which he finds himself—thriving in some roles, and flailing in others.

In diagnostic testing, there’s a basic distinction between sensitivity, or the ability to identify positive results, and specificity, the ability to exclude negative ones. A test with high specificity may avoid generating false positives, but at the price of missing many diagnoses. One with high sensitivity may catch those tricky diagnoses, but also generate false positives along the way. Some people seem to sift through information with high sensitivity, but low specificity—spotting connections that others can’t, and perhaps some that aren’t even there.

“Well, you’re just special. You’re American,” remarked my colleague, smirking from across the coffee table. My other Finnish coworkers, from the school in Helsinki where I teach, nodded in agreement. They had just finished critiquing one of my habits, and they could see that I was on the defensive.

I threw my hands up and snapped, “You’re accusing me of being too friendly? Is that really such a bad thing?”

“Well, when I greet a colleague, I keep track,” she retorted, “so I don’t greet them again during the day!” Another chimed in, “That’s the same for me, too!”

Unbelievable, I thought. According to them, I’m too generous with my hellos.

When I told them I would do my best to greet them just once every day, they told me not to change my ways. They said they understood me. But the thing is, now that I’ve viewed myself from their perspective, I’m not sure I want to remain the same. Change isn’t a bad thing. And since moving to Finland two years ago, I’ve kicked a few bad American habits.

Why the ingrained expectation that women should desire to become parents is unhealthy

In 2008, Nebraska decriminalized child abandonment. The move was part of a "safe haven" law designed to address increased rates of infanticide in the state. Like other safe-haven laws, parents in Nebraska who felt unprepared to care for their babies could drop them off in a designated location without fear of arrest and prosecution. But legislators made a major logistical error: They failed to implement an age limitation for dropped-off children.

Within just weeks of the law passing, parents started dropping off their kids. But here's the rub: None of them were infants. A couple of months in, 36 children had been left in state hospitals and police stations. Twenty-two of the children were over 13 years old. A 51-year-old grandmother dropped off a 12-year-old boy. One father dropped off his entire family -- nine children from ages one to 17. Others drove from neighboring states to drop off their children once they heard that they could abandon them without repercussion.

Democrats who have struggled for years to sell the public on the Affordable Care Act are now confronting a far more urgent task: mobilizing a political coalition to save it.

Even as the party reels from last month’s election defeat, members of Congress, operatives, and liberal allies have turned to plotting a campaign against repealing the law that, they hope, will rival the Tea Party uprising of 2009 that nearly scuttled its passage in the first place. A group of progressive advocacy groups will announce on Friday a coordinated effort to protect the beneficiaries of the Affordable Care Act and stop Republicans from repealing the law without first identifying a plan to replace it.

They don’t have much time to fight back. Republicans on Capitol Hill plan to set repeal of Obamacare in motion as soon as the new Congress opens in January, and both the House and Senate could vote to wind down the law immediately after President-elect Donald Trump takes the oath of office on the 20th.

Trinidad has the highest rate of Islamic State recruitment in the Western hemisphere. How did this happen?

This summer, the so-called Islamic State published issue 15 of its online magazine Dabiq. In what has become a standard feature, it ran an interview with an ISIS foreign fighter. “When I was around twenty years old I would come to accept the religion of truth, Islam,” said Abu Sa’d at-Trinidadi, recalling how he had turned away from the Christian faith he was born into.

At-Trinidadi, as his nom de guerre suggests, is from the Caribbean island of Trinidad and Tobago (T&T), a country more readily associated with calypso and carnival than the “caliphate.” Asked if he had a message for “the Muslims of Trinidad,” he condemned his co-religionists at home for remaining in “a place where you have no honor and are forced to live in humiliation, subjugated by the disbelievers.” More chillingly, he urged Muslims in T&T to wage jihad against their fellow citizens: “Terrify the disbelievers in their own homes and make their streets run with their blood.”

A professor of cognitive science argues that the world is nothing like the one we experience through our senses.

As we go about our daily lives, we tend to assume that our perceptions—sights, sounds, textures, tastes—are an accurate portrayal of the real world. Sure, when we stop and think about it—or when we find ourselves fooled by a perceptual illusion—we realize with a jolt that what we perceive is never the world directly, but rather our brain’s best guess at what that world is like, a kind of internal simulation of an external reality. Still, we bank on the fact that our simulation is a reasonably decent one. If it wasn’t, wouldn’t evolution have weeded us out by now? The true reality might be forever beyond our reach, but surely our senses give us at least an inkling of what it’s really like.

The same part of the brain that allows us to step into the shoes of others also helps us restrain ourselves.

You’ve likely seen the video before: a stream of kids, confronted with a single, alluring marshmallow. If they can resist eating it for 15 minutes, they’ll get two. Some do. Others cave almost immediately.

This “Marshmallow Test,” first conducted in the 1960s, perfectly illustrates the ongoing war between impulsivity and self-control. The kids have to tamp down their immediate desires and focus on long-term goals—an ability that correlates with their later health, wealth, and academic success, and that is supposedly controlled by the front part of the brain. But a new study by Alexander Soutschek at the University of Zurich suggests that self-control is also influenced by another brain region—and one that casts this ability in a different light.

The combination of suspicion and reverence that people feel toward the financially successful isn’t unique to the modern era, but reflects a deep ambivalence that goes back to the Roman empire.

In the early 20th century, Dale Carnegie began to travel the United States delivering to audiences a potent message he would refine and eventually publish in his 1936 bestseller, How To Win Friends and Influence People: “About 15 percent of one’s financial success is due to one’s technical knowledge and about 85 percent is due to skill in human engineering—to personality and the ability to lead people.” Carnegie, who based his claim on research done at institutes founded by the industrialist Andrew Carnegie (unrelated), thus enshrined for Americans the notion that leadership was the key to success in business—that profit might be less about engineering things and more about engineering people. Over 30 million copies of Carnegie’s book have been sold since its publication.