While you are voting for the person that you feel would be the best president, I am doing damage control...

Yes, I know exactly what you're doing. Before I finally realized, many years ago, what the Zionist game plan was, I would vote for Zionist scumbags, too. They are still defining your playing field, in part because you're handicapped by immersion in an entire society that promotes Zionist thought processes, and your response to their stimuli is, frankly, unfortunately, what I expect from most. That's why we're still sucking Zionist hind tit as a people, and are likely always going to. There are a few of us who refuse to do so, but too few. BTW, I won't be voting for Baldwin because my conscience needs freeing. I'll be voting for him because he is an excellent choice.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy.Totenkopfs

If anything, an independent will drain off votes and cause Obama to get elected.

So what? There's no difference between Sambo and McAmnesty. They both seek the same thing. McAmnesty will just further our destruction a little easier, that's all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy.Totenkopfs

I'm a realist. I think with my head rather than with my heart. If I vote for an independent candidate on this election I know my vote is just wasted.

Sadly, your vote is wasted if you vote for a Zionist scumbag, while rejecting a good man. BTW, conviction is not a "heart" attitude, it is a choice, a function of the brain. My brain tells me that Baldwin is the only acceptable candidate, given my principles and my convictions.

Not to sound mean-spirited, as that's not my intention here, but voting for either Zionist strikes me as a failure of conviction, if a person believes essentially in the same things as Baldwin. Of course, if your convictions align better with McAmnesty, that's a different matter.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy.Totenkopfs

A wise man choses his battles and a wise man knows to choose battles that he is capable of winning.

That sounds poetic, but asinine. A person of character fights when he HAS to fight, and does NOT when he doesn't have to. There is a difference between surrender and defeat. While I have the opportunity to vote for the good man, I'll do so, and stay in the battle, so to speak. But if you're inclined to surrender to Zionist logic, I can only appeal to your better judgment.

__________________

****** ******Money will buy a fine dog, but only kindness will make him wag his tail.

This is relevant. You gave an adage about having to choose the type of death of a loved one as an example of a double bind situation. An adage of doing a retreat and fighting another day, concerning Robert E. Lee, was given to you.

We are not here to fight, argue, or step on one another. We are here to change America and the world into a better place for the White race.

The house and senate Republicans are in full revolt against the whitehouse and..McCain joined them today, when He said the bush plan was nothing but aid for wallstreet and, fell way short of helping mainstreet. We take small victories where we find them.

This is relevant. You gave an adage about having to choose the type of death of a loved one as an example of a double bind situation. An adage of doing a retreat and fighting another day, concerning Robert E. Lee, was given to you.

As I said, irrelevant. Lee did not surrender to fight another day, he was utterly defeated and had no reasonable choices available to him, in his opinion, but the one he chose.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy.Totenkopfs

We are not here to fight, argue, or step on one another. We are here to change America and the world into a better place for the White race.

And part of our continuing destruction is the pernicious lack of conviction which pervades our group on far too many issues. Choosing the lesser of evils is a fool's game, and only fools engage in it. For myself, I'm done playing the Zionists' game, because it results in no gain, ever. I challenge you to cite one time when the choice of such repugnant people, when good people were available, resulted in some net gain to whites.

I'm not speaking of some noble display of resolution. I am attacking the notion, frankly, the utterly ignorant notion, that a choice between Sambo and McAmnesty is any choice at all. The only quality choice I see is Baldwin. If I were a Zionist zombie, McAmnesty or Sambo would make perfect sense, but I lack that characteristic.

The house and senate Republicans are in full revolt against the whitehouse and..McCain joined them today, when He said the bush plan was nothing but aid for wallstreet and, fell way short of helping mainstreet. We take small victories where we find them.

Referring to McAmnesty as He with a capital H now? What is he, your god?

While you are voting for the person that you feel would be the best president, I am doing damage control.

How is McCain better than Obama?

Quote:

Your only purposes for voting for Baldwin are easing your conscience and making a statement that third party candidates are viable candidates. However, in this election no, third party candidate is viable. Any single non-two party candidate will receive no more than 5 percent of the vote max this election. I'll bet money on that.

Woah. I guess I might as well vote for an exterminator of my race because Baldwin will get less than five percent.

Quote:

I'm a realist. I think with my head rather than with my heart. If I vote for an independent candidate on this election I know my vote is just wasted.

A wise man choses his battles and a wise man knows to choose battles that he is capable of winning.

You talk about being a wise man yet believe in the legitimacy of the system of our executioners.

Quote:

In the scenario you outlined with a loved one being held hostage you would have no control over the outcome unless you were able to effectively change this person's mind.

The facts are:

1) McCain is rated as having an F- on gun rights from the GOA
2) He voted for radical Jewish feminist and ACLU member Ruth Bader Ginsburg for the Supreme Court.
3) Is an Israeli Firster.
4) Admitted to having no knowledge of economics.
5) Admitted to Bill O'Rielly that his amnesty bill of 2006 would have made America a non-European country.
6) Adopted a daughter from India or some third world country.
7) Does nothing but compromise with communist ideologues in the Senate.
8) Is a member of the Council On Foreign Relations, whose purpose is to create world government.

In my opinion, anyone who votes for McCain is not a white nationalist. Anyone who thinks voting makes a difference is hopelessly lost.

As I said, irrelevant. Lee did not surrender to fight another day, he was utterly defeated and had no reasonable choices available to him, in his opinion, but the one he chose.
And part of our continuing destruction is the pernicious lack of conviction which pervades our group on far too many issues. Choosing the lesser of evils is a fool's game, and only fools engage in it. For myself, I'm done playing the Zionists' game, because it results in no gain, ever. I challenge you to cite one time when the choice of such repugnant people, when good people were available, resulted in some net gain to whites.

I'm not speaking of some noble display of resolution. I am attacking the notion, frankly, the utterly ignorant notion, that a choice between Sambo and McAmnesty is any choice at all. The only quality choice I see is Baldwin. If I were a Zionist zombie, McAmnesty or Sambo would make perfect sense, but I lack that characteristic.

Please don't try to convince adults that a vote for a man who has no chance of winning is anything other than a protest. It is probably not even as good a protest as staying home. When I voted for third party candidates, it was for men I had reason to believe shared my views to some extent. Wallace in 68, following his years of opposition to integration, and Paul in 88, after I had read his racial views in his newsletter which he now disavows, are examples.

Baldwin has said the he believes that God gave Palestine to the jews and that the Palestinians have NO rights there at all. He has said the he believes in "The rapture of the church." Why should I vote for a man who thinks there is a good chance he is going to "Fly away" before his term is ended?

For someone like me, who lived most of his adult life in Virginia, there could be a very good reason for voting for the zionist lap-dog, McCain, and here it is:

If Obama were elected, and acted like a negro politician, then everything Dr.Duke and others say about his administration awakening Whites might very well come to pass. But, if he were to govern like Doug Wilder governed in Virginia from 89 to 93, it would be a disaster for us, because it would totally desensitize our people to the dangers of negro control.

There is NO example of a negro mayor, governor, congressman or senator who was elected by an electorate with less than 20% negroes who governed like a negro. You don't get Kwame Kirkpatrick or Marion Barry in such jurisdictions. You get Wellington Webb, Ed Brooke and Douglas Wilder. They accomplish very little, but they convince the unawakened that negro leaders are not really that bad, thus making the odds of a REAL negro being elected in the future much greater.

Virginia is a toss-up state right now. Had Wilder not been governor,and kept his voice down and his nose clean for four years, Obama would not have a chance in hell of carrying that state. I personally know people who have voted Democrat all their lives who did not vote for Wilder because he was a mulatto. Now those people are going to vote for Obama because the first mulatto did not engage in TNB in office.

There are many things to consider in this election and a decision not to waste a vote in a close state is not necessarily a result of either stupidity or disloyalty to the White race. In fact, it could be a direct result of concern for the White race that leads one to vote for McCain. A vote for McCain, in a close state, is the only meaningful anti-Obama action. And that is a fact!

In my opinion, anyone who votes for McCain is not a white nationalist. Anyone who thinks voting makes a difference is hopelessly lost.

In my opinion anyone who makes such a statement as this is letting election season emotion control his brain. If a White Nationalist were honestly convinced that it would further the 14 words to have four years of Obama, he could vote for the negro and still be a WN. If a man truly believed he could further the 14 words by voting for the zionist shill, McCain, he could vote for the zionist and still be a WN.

It gladdens the hearts of our enemies, who are going to win, no matter which of the two are elected, to see us ripping each other up over an election wherein we are going to be losers whatever the outcome.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy.TotenkopfsWhile you are voting for the person that you feel would be the best president, I am doing damage control...

Yes, I know exactly what you're doing. Before I finally realized, many years ago, what the Zionist game plan was, I would vote for Zionist scumbags, too. They are still defining your playing field, in part because you're handicapped by immersion in an entire society that promotes Zionist thought processes, and your response to their stimuli is, frankly, unfortunately, what I expect from most. That's why we're still sucking Zionist hind tit as a people, and are likely always going to. There are a few of us who refuse to do so, but too few. BTW, I won't be voting for Baldwin because my conscience needs freeing. I'll be voting for him because he is an excellent choice.

The "zionist game plan" is a phrase you use to try to press your point across. I hope you have the gumption to avoid using a capital Z when you spell zionest from now on. It is deplorable to show respect for jewish swine. You are a person that is advocating a negro running the fine country of America. Race traitor! The far majority of jews will vote for the negro but your mindset fails to recognize this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy.TotenkopfsIf anything, an independent will drain off votes and cause Obama to get elected.

So what? There's no difference between Sambo and McAmnesty. They both seek the same thing. McAmnesty will just further our destruction a little easier, that's all.

There is no difference between a negro and a White man???? What is wrong with you?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy.TotenkopfsI'm a realist. I think with my head rather than with my heart. If I vote for an independent candidate on this election I know my vote is just wasted.

Sadly, your vote is wasted if you vote for a Zionist scumbag, while rejecting a good man. BTW, conviction is not a "heart" attitude, it is a choice, a function of the brain. My brain tells me that Baldwin is the only acceptable candidate, given my principles and my convictions.

Not to sound mean-spirited, as that's not my intention here, but voting for either Zionist strikes me as a failure of conviction, if a person believes essentially in the same things as Baldwin. Of course, if your convictions align better with McAmnesty, that's a different matter.

A wasted vote? What kind of moron votes for people who have no chance for President? The type of idiot who will get a negro elected!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy.TotenkopfsA wise man choses his battles and a wise man knows to choose battles that he is capable of winning.

That sounds poetic, but asinine. A person of character fights when he HAS to fight, and does NOT when he doesn't have to. There is a difference between surrender and defeat. While I have the opportunity to vote for the good man, I'll do so, and stay in the battle, so to speak. But if you're inclined to surrender to Zionist logic, I can only appeal to your better judgment.

Very far from asinine as only a total idiot fights a battle that they will lose. Regroup and attack when you have the advantage. Little victories turn into bigger ones.

Lots of people are starting to look into the WN movement after being confronted by the recent changes. When they look on this site we represent the people who are very pro white. It is a disservice to our race to be a crackpot as you scare off others. Get with the program...

In my opinion anyone who makes such a statement as this is letting election season emotion control his brain. If a White Nationalist were honestly convinced that it would further the 14 words to have four years of Obama, he could vote for the negro and still be a WN. If a man truly believed he could further the 14 words by voting for the zionist shill, McCain, he could vote for the zionist and still be a WN.

It gladdens the hearts of our enemies, who are going to win, no matter which of the two are elected, to see us ripping each other up over an election wherein we are going to be losers whatever the outcome.

There was a recent article about a poll that supposedly showed that a certain percentage of whites would never vote for a negro. I highly doubt that those same people would change their views if Obama were president. It is pretty obvious how he is going to govern this country if he wins the White House. Now, if Mccain is just as anti white as Obama, wouldn't you think that Mccain would continue to lull our people to sleep instead of making whites say "hey this negro president is doing this to us white people". If we continue to elect white neo con multiculti lovers into office, white people will NEVER wake up. Seeing a black man in the white house would certainly make me say "hmm there is something wrong here", and you know what, if whites show that they don't mind having a black nationalist or a white race traitor in office, the country is done anyway.