PITTSBURGH (AP) — Citizens groups and nonprofits around the nation are asking questions about environmental and health impacts of natural gas hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, and Pennsylvania charities are funding much of the debate.

Foundations from Philadelphia to Pittsburgh have provided more than $19 million for gas-drilling-related grants since 2009, according to an Associated Press review of charity data. The money has paid for scientific studies, films, radio programs, websites and even trout fishing groups that monitor water quality.

View full sizeDONALD GILLILAND, The Patriot-News, 2010A Marcellus Shale well sits high on a bluff over the Susquehanna River in Windham Township, Wyoming County.

That’s led to expressions of gratitude from those who say state and federal governments aren’t doing enough on the issue but also protests from some in the gas-drilling industry, who claim there’s bias in the campaigns.

“We are trying to be balanced. We will sacrifice the environment for nothing,” said Robert Vagt, president of the Heinz Endowments, a Pittsburgh charity founded in 1941. The foundation, which is not affiliated with the company of the same name, has given more than $12 million to Cornell University, the Clean Air Council, the Foundation for Pennsylvania Watersheds, Duquesne University, the environmental law organization Earthjustice, the Pittsburgh Filmmakers, Trout Unlimited and others.

One scientist said some research wouldn’t have happened without the Heinz support.

“Foundation support has been critical as we and others who study water have worked to understand how energy and water resources affect each other in southwestern Pennsylvania,” Carnegie Mellon University professor Jeanne VanBriesen wrote in an email.

R. John Dawes, executive director of the Foundation for Pennsylvania Watersheds, said Heinz funding “has been critical for citizen awareness and citizen input” on the gas-drilling issue.

But the Marcellus Shale Coalition, a leading industry group, criticized what it sees as a “record of bankrolling organizations and institutions opposed to the safe development of job-creating American natural gas.”

The recipients of Heinz grants have a wide range of views. Some take no official position or just want better oversight, while others are clearly opposed to drilling.

For example, Earthjustice received a $50,000 Heinz grant to “ensure environmentally sustainable natural gas exploration and production in the Marcellus Shale.” But the Earthjustice website calls fracking dangerous and shortsighted and said it’s “poisoning our air and water.”

Fracking has made it possible to tap into deep reserves of oil and gas but has raised concerns about pollution. Large volumes of water, along with sand and hazardous chemicals, are injected underground to break rock apart and free the oil and gas. Contaminated wastewater from the process can leak from faulty well casings into aquifers, but it’s often difficult to trace underground sources of pollution.

Regulators contend that overall, water- and air-pollution problems are rare, but environmental groups and some scientists say there hasn’t been enough research on those issues. The industry and many federal and state officials say the practice is safe when done properly, and many rules on air pollution and disclosure of the chemicals used in fracking are being strengthened.

Vagt said the Heinz Endowments simply feels that many questions about gas drilling need answers.

Heinz also has worked with gas-drilling companies on projects, such as a study that EQT Co. supported that examines whether it makes environmental and financial sense to convert Pittsburgh’s bus fleet to run on natural gas.

Andrew Johnson, a program officer with the William Penn Foundation based in Philadelphia, said that region’s drinking water is a prime focus of the more than $2 million in grants it has awarded over the past year.

“The reason we’re stepping up is to a large degree the Philadelphia water supply comes from the forested headwaters,” Johnson said, adding that campaigns to get more federal oversight of gas drilling have been a priority.

“We’ve also tended to focus on efforts to encourage U.S. EPA to become more involved, mobilizing people to become actively engaged,” he said of the federal Environmental Protection Agency. “It wasn’t clear to us that what had been done was sufficient,” he said of local and state efforts.

The William Penn Foundation has given money to the Sierra Club, Citizens for Pennsylvania’s Future, the Delaware River Basin Commission, the National Resources Defense Council, Trout Unlimited and others. Those groups have a range of opinions on gas drilling, from opposition to cautious support.

Related Stories

Featured Story

Get 'Today's Front Page' in your inbox

This newsletter is sent every morning at 6 a.m. and includes the morning's top stories, a full list of obituaries, links to comics and puzzles and the most recent news, sports and entertainment headlines.

optionalCheck here if you do not want to receive additional email offers and information.See our privacy policy

Thank you for signing up for 'Today's Front Page'

To view and subscribe to any of our other newsletters, please click here.