The tablet we tried first was a Pipo W4 8" model and at the time cost
around £70 (from China). It has 16GB of disk storage and 1GB ram. With Windows, minimal
applications and Cortex it had very little disk space left. So although it worked
its not a very practical specification. However its biggest drawback was the fact that
charging power is supplied via the USB port (which is very common in these devices).

This is a drawback because when the tablet is being charged it becomes a
peripheral rather than a controller.In other words you can't then easily use it to
connect to a PCU in order to communicate with the IDRANet. Having said
that, most such tablets support USB OTG which may allow this but you'd have
to have some special in between hub or adapter (we think) so all a bit messy.

In summary: not a practical proposition.

The second device we tried was a Guleek i8. This was like a tablet without a screen.
It contained a battery and had beter connectivity including a separate USB port.
Similalry priced and using Windows 8.1 with Bing. It had 16Gb of memory which
soon went down to zero after Cortex and a few applications were installed. Also
not having an integral screen made it more difficult to handle out of the box. Strangely
it had an Android rather than Windows based remote user inteface and limited
graphics configurations made it difficult to work well with an older TV/monitor inspite of HDMI.
In any case some kind of keyboard interface still required. Conclusion: Not practical as it
stands.

The third device tried was a Cube iworks 8" tablet again purchased from
China and cost approx £85. This was specifically choosen as a result of
the knowledge gained from the above two. Firstly it has a seperate power
jack rather than power via USB socket. So it could be powered from the mains
and at the same time connected to the PCU. It has 32GB of ROM so plenty of space for
History files etc. It also has 2GB ram. One slight drawback is the
volume out of the audio jack was quite low but a modification to the PCU
can help boost that for IDRANet usage.
The cameras can also appear in Cortex but this has not been tested much.
MS Windows was configured for the Chinese market so took a while to
configure for UK use.

Speed of operation is acceptable for small and medium installations
but probably not suited for the heavily automated systems.

Our main focus so far has been testing for use as a secondary backup PC in
a dual Cortex PC network configuration. In such a scenario the tablet will connect
to the network via its own PCU. This allows the two PCs to be aware of each other through
IDRANet and for the backup PC to automatically take control if it does not 'hear' the
main PC. Note that backup PCs still need Cortex licences but in recognition
of such usage we are providing discounted pricing for such licences (see web site)

Configuring and installing a network is best done having a larger screen
with keyboard and mouse which can be temporarily attached to the tablet.
However you can simply copy the database from the main PC and change a 'few' things.

Note: This information is provided in good faith and without any warranty, implied or otherwise.

Anyone ever done any investigations into split system air conditioners which would lend itself towards Idratek suitability?

Thanks in advance,

Marcus
]]>Idratekmarcusleehttp://www.automatedhome.co.uk/vbulletin/showthread.php?4226-Split-System-Air-Conditioning-suggestionsEclipse ..http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/vbulletin/showthread.php?4223-Eclipse&goto=newpost
Sat, 21 Mar 2015 00:31:39 GMTThought you might be interested in some external sensory data gathered by Cortex from two of our systems for yesterday's eclipse event :). One system based in Newcastle and the other in Trowbridge. Also added for interest is more pronounced effect on light level in an internal room (Newcastle site).