Merely saying things to Trump supporters is inciting "imminent lawless action" because there are so many unstable people within that group that
shouting questions/slogans triggers them to respond with violence?

That's essentially your argument as I see it.

Schenck v. United States is actually a case about a man (Charles Schenck) and his cohort who were arrested under the Sedition Act of 1917 for
distributing leaflets that encouraged people to resist the draft.

In your haste to figure out how a crime was committed, you've inadvertantly cited a case of political speech being quashed by the government.

No, being pissed is not an negative emotion. if it is then you have anger issues. I can be pissed my son got a bad grade but I do not beat him.
Non-negative. I can also be pissed at my neighbor and give him the finger. Negative.

Being pissed at your kid for getting a bad grade is negative.

Maybe you should talk to him to see what he is having trouble with and help him understand it, instead of getting angry at him.

I don't understand how you think getting pissed isn't a negative emotion.

Jesus Christ. You people will find any excuse for this low life sh**, won't you? I'd say it takes a gutless coward to stand by and let people spit on
them and wait for someone else to defend them. But, you keep on believing Clinton is above all this. When the time comes, do you really think your
"Hillary For President" bumper sticker will make a damn bit of difference?
What sickens me about you Liberals is, you claim to believe everyone is equal, when your words and actions show you think you're better than everyone
else. Equal Rights! [ but only if you agree with us ]

I don't give a flying fig about Democrats & Republicans and your bitter battle. There are some of us that don't support either party and I don't
appreciate your stupid partisan dirty tricks leading to police officers being injured.

Then you should probably stay out of politics.

I don't hear the Chicago police complaining, they even stated Trump could have stayed because they had it well under control.

I won't be forced out of politics because you condone this.

Screw that. I will continue to voice my opinion that THIS is not how 'politics' should work.

I think YOU should stay out of politics if THIS is how you think it should be. Reasonable people don't want this in politics.

No thanks, I will stay active in politics.

You said before you are against the two party system, right?

So you are already out of politics, whether you want to be or not.

Oh, please.

Your opinion on how little my voice matters in politics is meaningless and empty.

You are the one being led by your nose with illusions. Your world of politics is an illusion.

And yet, a Democrat or Republican will win the Presidency and the House and Senate will have all but one or two seats occupied by Democarts or
Repbulicans.

Merely saying things to Trump supporters is inciting "imminent lawless action" because there are so many unstable people within that group that
shouting questions/slogans triggers them to respond with violence?

That's essentially your argument as I see it.

Schenck v. United States is actually a case about a man (Charles Schenck) and his cohort who were arrested under the Sedition Act of 1917 for
distributing leaflets that encouraged people to resist the draft.

In your haste to figure out how a crime was committed, you've inadvertantly cited a case of political speech being quashed by the
government.

I didn't inadvertently cite anything.

I cited a portion of the summary of the evolution from the Schneck case to where we are now.

If you say and do things with the intention of inciting violence, that's not protected speech. That was my point.

Yelling "fire" in a movie theater is in no way analogous to yelling "Trump is a Nazi" at people in a line waiting to get into a rally. Yelling "fire"
isn't about "out of control emotions" it's an alarm that there's imminent danger which causes people to panic.

On the other hand, yelling "Trump is a racist!" would be a statement of political belief and the person who acted violently in response is the one who
is actually doing something wrong.

Yelling "fire" in a movie theater is in no way analogous to yelling "Trump is a Nazi" at people in a line waiting to get into a rally. Yelling "fire"
isn't about "out of control emotions" it's an alarm that there's imminent danger which causes people to panic.

On the other hand, yelling "Trump is a racist!" would be a statement of political belief and the person who acted violently in response is the one who
is actually doing something wrong.

Stop trying to derail the thread please...
We're trying to discuss the underhand and corrupt DNC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.