If pirates should be punished, how about Du Pont, the SWINDLER?
如果盗版者应该处罚，对杜邦(诈骗犯)应该如何处理？
您（美国知识产权所有者）能不为流氓杜邦的无耻诈骗行为承担损失吗？
（如果您上www.google.com网站搜索，复制"美国杜邦化学公司" 八 个汉字的全名粘贴在"搜索框"中，就可在从第1网页开始的10多个网页内搜索到我已经发表过的10多封英文或/及中文公开信。）
If pirates should be punished, how about Du Pont, the SWINDLER?Could you (intellectual property proprietors in U.S.A.) avoid shouldering loss for SWINDLER Du Pont's shameful behaviors for profit?
(If you log on www.google.com, copy and paste the 8-Chinese character full name of Du Pont "美国杜邦化学公司", you could see more than 10 published English or/and Chinese open letters by me on more than 10 pages from the first one.)
All intellectual property proprietors in U.S., how are you?
Your government sued Chinese government for "not doing its best to fight against piracy" to WTO on April 9, 2007. Chinese government publicly reiterated its resolution to strictly crash piracy, and compensated related companies in your country with several billions USD for their loss. As a result, enterprises involved in piracy were devastatingly struck, but related company in your country still thought Chinese government was not in its best to crash piracy. If now your government still fails to convince or force Du Pont to fulfill its obligations in Agreement 1995, world public may have a series of doubt and concern below. Since Du Pont could 100% publicly possessed by power (exclusive possession) Mr. Huang's patent technology of effective and nontoxic agricultural pesticide, why venders in other countries were accused of violation of law for just selling some piratical disks, which is far from 100% publicly possessing by power the right of production and sales of the disks worldwide? Why could Du Pont distain and trample the law, but venders have to observe all laws? Why must laws be strictly enforced by other country's government? Although other country's government has the intention to strictly enforce the laws and take relevant actions, since Du Pont's behaviors-publicly possession of Mr. Huang's patent by force, refusing to fulfill its commitments in Agreement 1995 to pay patent fee and license fee to Mr. Huang for many years, slandering China "a raffish country", and Mr. Huang "a rascal", writing letter to threaten and intimidate Mr. Huang and bringing false charge against him before Chinese police-did not deserve what they should have, with the feeling of unfairness and negative mentality caused in the public worldwide, would that take the effect of "strictly enforcing the laws" as expected? Whether it would instigate a minority of people to breach your intellectual property as revenge? Whether it will lead to a vicious circle of competitively violating the others' intellectual property? If these doubt and concerns unfortunately come true, would it be an absurd situation in which other intellectual property proprietors in your country should shoulder the loss for Du Pont's unashamed violation of agreement? Then why should trade intellectual propertyproprietors' legal benefits for illegal benefits of Du Pont and its accomplice? Why?Why??Why??? Is it necessary?
Implementation of a law, regulation or agreement should rely on not only compulsory measures adopted by government, but also, or more important, on conscious abidance of related parties worldwide. To achieve that goal, related law-executing departments must bear "all are equal before the law" in mind during execution process,but must not ignore open and brutal trample of laws, regulations and agreements of one certain member, who is with great power or has special interest relations with the executor. Otherwise, any agreement between governments will become blank beforepublic without any sanction.
Disputes between Mr. Huang and Du Pont comprise of adequate fact evidence and clear legal relations (rights and obligations), namely Du Pont has been fully entitled to the rights regulated in Agreement 1995, now simply carrying out the corresponding obligations will solve all problems. What we are waiting for now is just forced fulfillment of Du Pont of obligations in Agreement 1995 by law-executing departments in your country.
Best wishes!
Universal Agent: SXF 2007-11-15
如果盗版者应该处罚，对杜邦(诈骗犯)应该如何处理？
您（美国知识产权所有者）能不为流氓杜邦的无耻诈骗行为承担损失吗？
（如果您上www.google.com网站搜索，复制"美国杜邦化学公司" 八 个汉字的全名粘贴在"搜索框"中，就可在从第1网页开始的10多个网页内搜索到我已经发表过的10多封英文或/及中文公开信。）
尊敬的美国知识产权所有者，各位好！
贵国政府已在2007年4月9日以中国政府"打击盗版不力"为由向WTO提起了诉讼。中国政府严厉打击盗版是多次向全世界公开过的，并已依法向贵国有关公司赔偿了数以十亿美元计的损失，使有盗版活动的企业受到了毁灭性的打击，只是贵国有关公司还认为"打击盗版不力"而已（"打击盗版不力"，《参改消息》2007.04.11.P8援引美联社华盛顿4月10日电）。如果现在贵国政府还不能说服或强制美国杜邦化学公司履行它在《1995年协议》中所承诺的义务的话，全世界许多公众可能会产生下述一系列疑问和忧虑。既然杜邦可以公开地100%（"独占性"）地强占黄先生的高效、无毒农业虫剂专利技术，为什么别国的小商贩卖几张盗版光盘（远远不是公开地100%地强占了那些光盘在全世界的生产、销售权）就违法呢？为什么杜邦可以蔑视践踏法律，那些小商贩就必须"有法必依"呢？别国政府就必须"执法必严"呢？即使别国政府有"执法必严"的意愿并采取了"执法必严"的行动，但是由于杜邦公开强占黄先生的专利、多年来一直拒绝按照它在《1995年协议》中的承诺向黄先生支付专利费和许可证费并且反而坚持诬蔑中国（P.R.China）是一个下贱的无赖国家、黄先生是一个下贱的无赖份子、写信对黄先生进行威胁-恫吓、到中国公安机关对黄先生进行诬告陷害，得不到应有的处理，因此在全世界公众中产生受不平等待遇的感觉和逆反心理，能取得"执法必严"的效果吗？是否甚至反而会激发极少数人报复性地侵犯贵国的知识产权呢？这样是否会造成一种相互竞赛性地侵犯对方知识产权的恶性循环呢？如果这些疑问与忧虑不幸成为现实的话，那不就成了一种杜邦无耻违约获利而贵国其他知识产权所有者为杜邦的无耻违约获利行为承担损失的荒谬局面吗？那为什么要用你们这些知识产权所有者的合法利益来换取杜邦及其合谋者的非法利益呢？为什么?为什么??为什么???有此必要吗？
一个法律、法规、协议的执行，除了依靠政府的强制措施外，还必须、甚至更重要的是全世界相关成员的自觉遵守；而要全世界相关成员自觉遵守，相关执法部门在执法时就必做到"在法律面前，人人平等"，而不能因为某一成员势力较大或执法者与这一成员有某种特殊利益关系就对它公开地、粗暴地践踏法律、法规、协议的行为不给予处理 ，由他任意公开地、粗暴地践踏法律、法规、协议，否则任何政府间的协议在公众面都很可能仅仅就是一纸空文 ，对公众没有任何约束力。
黄先生与杜邦之间的纠纷,事实证据充分，法律（权利和义务）关系明确，即杜邦已经完全享受了《1995年协议》中规定的权利，只要履行《1995年协议》中规定的义务就一切问题都解决了。现在只等待贵国执法部门强制杜邦履行《1995年协议》中规定的义务。
此致
最崇高的敬礼！
全责代理人：SXF 2007-11-15
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://snf.stanford.edu/pipermail/coral/attachments/20071122/17433102/attachment.html>