Follow Sunlit Uplands by E-Mail

Thursday, September 6, 2012

The Silence of Bill and Hillary Clinton

Editor’s note: A different version of this article first appeared at National Catholic Register.

Bill Clinton was basking in glory at the Democratic National
Convention on Wednesday night. Few presidents so love the spotlight. The
occasion for Clinton, however, was not himself, but the reelection of
Barack Obama.

To that end, Clinton’s stumping for Obama presents some interesting
contrasts, as the press has noted. Quite unnoticed, however, is a
particularly compelling contrast relating to religious freedom—an area
where Barack Obama has been a foe, most notably via his terribly
intolerant Health and Human Services mandate, and where Bill Clinton has
been woefully silent.

For Bill Clinton—and for his wife,
Hillary Clinton—that silence is conspicuous. Indeed, it may surprise
readers to learn this, but both Clintons have been vigorous defenders of
religious freedom. First consider Bill Clinton:

As Clinton stated in his memoirs: “I
always felt that protecting religious liberty and making the White House
accessible to all religious faiths was an important part of my job.” As
president, Clinton practiced what he preached. He championed (among
others) the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act (passed 97-3 by the
Senate) and the 1997 Guidelines on Religious Exercise and Religious
Expression in the Federal Workplace. As to the former, Clinton signed it
“to protect a reasonable range of religious expression in public areas
like schools and workplaces.”

Pointing to these actions and more, my
colleague, Dr. Gary Smith, who has studied Bill Clinton’s faith, has
rightly described the former president as a “strong advocate” of
“religious freedom at home and abroad.”

That’s fair to say. It is likewise true for Hillary Clinton.

Mrs. Clinton long supported her
husband’s 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act, especially its
promotion of religious freedom in public schools. In her book, “It Takes
a Village,” Mrs. Clinton sounded like a conservative when emphasizing
the importance of religion in schools. Quoting her husband, she noted
that “nothing in the First Amendment converts our public schools into
religion-free zones, or requires all religious expression to be left
behind at the schoolhouse door.” She cited these words from her husband:
“[R]eligion is too important in our history and our heritage for us to
keep it out of our schools.”

Once capable of making law herself, as
an elected senator from New York, Mrs. Clinton championed an initiative
promoting religious freedom in the workplace. Specifically, in April
2005, Senator Clinton co-sponsored the Workplace Religious Freedom Act,
joining forces (remarkably) with no less than Senator Rick Santorum, her
polar opposite. The law guaranteed the right to religious expression on
the job without fear of recrimination. This meant, for example, that an
Orthodox Jew who honors the Sabbath cannot be forced to work on the
Sabbath against his or her will, or that a Christian can wear a
crucifix, or that a Sikh can don a turban. Backers of the bill included a
broad coalition of 40 clerics representing nearly every denomination.

The bill, which any reasonable person
would support, had opponents among Senator Clinton’s staunchest allies.
Predictably, Planned Parenthood and the National Women’s Law Center
foresaw calamitous instances of “anti-choice” injustice, such as a
situation where a pro-life nurse might request to not provide the
“morning-after” pill to a rape victim, or a Catholic pharmacist might as
a matter of conscience refuse to dispense birth control. For these
“pro-choice” feminists, religious freedom could not be permitted to
trump their preeminent freedom: their sacred right to an abortion.

It was this narrow opposition from radical feminists that might have explained why, as the Village Voice put it, “[Mrs.] Clinton’s office has been notably quiet about her involvement” in the bill.

That was then. Today, Mrs. Clinton
serves in the Obama administration—though at the State Department, not
the Department of Health and Human Services. And today, Mrs. Clinton,
like her husband, is silent on the Obama HHS mandate.

Indeed, that begs the question: Where are the Clintons now, as the
current head of their party, President Obama, continues to stubbornly
enforce his HHS mandate requiring all Americans, of every religious
belief and denomination, to forcibly fund abortion drugs? Have these
fighters for religious freedom said anything at all to the president?
Have they voiced even a slight objection? To the contrary, in his
glowing endorsement of Obama at the Democratic convention, Bill Clinton
gushed about Obamacare, with no mention of the HHS mandate.

This website is dedicated to a renewal of Christian culture. It is inspired by Sir Winston Churchill, a valiant defender of Christian civilization, who believed "we have a great treasure to guard; that the inheritance in our possession represents the prolonged achievement of the centuries." With Churchill, we believe that a "fraternal association" of the English-speaking peoples must "for their own safety and for the good of all walk together in majesty, in justice and in peace.”