A Picture Of The Universe As A Babyhttp://www.businessinsider.com/nasas-hubble-telescope-shows-earliest-galaxies-2012-12/comments
en-usWed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 -0500Sun, 02 Aug 2015 19:12:06 -0400Dina Spectorhttp://www.businessinsider.com/c/50c961d06bb3f7c71f000001Ettore GrecoThu, 13 Dec 2012 00:04:16 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/50c961d06bb3f7c71f000001
3 to close the circle
If wave equals energy and atom equals energy 2 of 3 equals makes them all equal. Like 3 names of the same One. This simple logic finds one remarkable resistance from science since the third equivalence has not yet been included. In spite of two findings from Einstein and Planck, one to show the equation between atoms and energy and the other to discover the constant between waves' frequencies and energy, traditional science has not yet closed the circle. Still today, this science does not recognize the transformation from waves to atoms. The bureaucracy of traditional science prevents the recognition of any event unless certain criteria are first met. The problem exists precisely in the compilation of these "laws" or criteria introduced by a few scientists in the name of all science. One new Progressive Science includes the transformation from waves to atoms and has new understanding of the relation between Space and Time. With the discovery of Wavevolution, Progressive Science and Religion are one and the same. Wavevolution reveals how the origin of all energy was first waves and then mass, how the behavior in waves and atoms is identical and how one same movement common to all energy is comparable to One Divine Will that creates the whole Universe. Nevertheless, since the time of Galileo, anytime a scientific finding has challenged one religious dogma, science has always had to yield before Religion. Often, the same scientists feel compelled to yield to Religion. One example was when Einstein became alienated by the concept of Quantum mechanics because he didn’t want to accept a “World of probabilities” contrary to his Jewish Religion. This happened even after a discovery that had finally revealed the key to comprehend the Universe.
It would seem that Religious scientists are those less likely to find that objectivity needed to recognize the origin of the Universe. In fact, modern scientists have introduced new theories, but, like also in the past for Einstein, the promoters of Standard Model (Sheldon Lee Glashow and Steven Weinberg) and String Theory (Leonard Susskind) are Jewish scientists strongly supported by the media which popularize their theories even if they are both inconclusive when attempting to explain how the Universe could have been created from those conditions. In their theories, these scientists are trying to explain the Creation with particles of atomic mass already existing at the time of the Big Bang, as Einstein sustained (and adding only to more confusion). Instead, energy in form of atoms did not exist under the heat and pressure at the time of the Big Bang. The Universe began with energy in form of waves and without atoms. In no other way could the Creation be explained.
<a href="http://www.wikinfo.org/Multilingual/index.php/Wavevolution" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://www.wikinfo.org/Multilingual/index.php/Wavevolution</a>
<a href="http://www.wavevolution.org/en/index.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://www.wavevolution.org/en/index.html</a>