I read one of his tweets where he said that he didn't like the innocent parents being bullied. I think there's more to it, but what? They are connected in some way, IMO.

Jim Gamble on sentencing people who watch images of grown men abusing children and infants, causing them pain and torture:

"We must understand them, locking them up is not the right way, these people need help and support to overcome their problem"

Jim Gamble on internet trolls:

"Lock the swines up for 2 years"

Well, as clear an illustration as we need for what a lot of this is really about. We just need someone in the right position of authority, who has enough backing from the right quarters to grow a pair and reverse the grip these sickening individuals seem to have. As it stands, quite contrary to the claims of "child protection" certain individuals seem to be more poacher than gamekeeper.

Why does a very senior ex-police officer who has been in charge of terrorism and child protection support the McCanns when there is an ongoing investigation by UK police?

I'm insinuating nothing, I just want to know why. I'm non-plussed.

Why does Jim Gamble congratulate Kent Police for catching a lone paedophile, not criticise the absolutely pitiful sentence that was doled out by a judge and yet demand the police and CPS need to catch online abuse to people such as the McCanns? The McCanns aren't children - they've even said publicly they don't do twitter!!!!

Why does Jim Gamble think the McCanns are worthy of mention in his business of child abuse and online protection?

It's my understanding that Jim Gamble sells training programmes about online protection for children. He has recently delivered a training programme from his company INEQE to Birmingham schools. I'd like to know if the training programme his company offered to Birmingham schools was awarded under a 'tender' process and what was exactly billed.

@aquila wrote:It's my understanding that Jim Gamble sells training programmes about online protection for children. He has recently delivered a training programme from his company INEQE to Birmingham schools. I'd like to know if the training programme his company offered to Birmingham schools was awarded under a 'tender' process and what was exactly billed.

My daughter's school's website has this on their home page - as it happens, almost right next to her picture.

Here's a person attached to Missing People charity from Leicester Police

Taken from Missing People's website.

Chris Rollings

Chris Rollings is Vice Chair of trustees. Currently the Head of Customer Services for Three Valleys Housing, a social housing provider based in the Midlands, Chris was formerly a Chief Superintendent with Leicestershire Police where he was in charge of missing persons for ten years. Following a HMIC inspection in 2007, Chris achieved an ‘excellent’ rating for missing persons investigations - Leicestershire Police was the only police force in the country to do so. From 2005 to 2012 Chris chaired a national police group whose aim was to improve practice in missing persons investigations. This was achieved through a multi-agency approach, and use of a modern bespoke ICT systems. He was also an active member of the national Strategic Oversight Group for Missing with a remit to improve missing persons prevention, investigation and support. Chris has an MBA and a degree in psychology and is a keen runner. In 2011 he ran the London Marathon for Missing People!

I apologize in advance for choosing this thread at random as there are quite a few threads re Mr. Gamble and I couldn't be bothered to look through them.

I had a look at Jim Gamble's twitter stuff today. A lot of re-tweeting but nothing from Jim himself in the last week. Big support for the Missing People's Big Tweet effort by virtue of re-tweet.

Jimmy two flags who has now become Jimmy no flags on his Ineque website (I still don't understand why Table Mountain, Cape Town, South Africa is still up there - surely a nice picture of somewhere in Northern Ireland would be more appropriate) who seems totally drawn to confirming his Northern Ireland roots and his work there, appeared in the Belfast Telegraph today with an interview.

Here is a retweet from Jim Gamble, staunch supporter of Missing People, staunch supporter of the McCanns, staunch supporter of the Labour Party, staunch supporter of Summers & Swann's book (you get the picture) not particularly keen on Theresa May....

@aquila wrote:I apologize in advance for choosing this thread at random as there are quite a few threads re Mr. Gamble and I couldn't be bothered to look through them.

I had a look at Jim Gamble's twitter stuff today. A lot of re-tweeting but nothing from Jim himself in the last week. Big support for the Missing People's Big Tweet effort by virtue of re-tweet.

Jimmy two flags who has now become Jimmy no flags on his Ineque website (I still don't understand why Table Mountain, Cape Town, South Africa is still up there - surely a nice picture of somewhere in Northern Ireland would be more appropriate) who seems totally drawn to confirming his Northern Ireland roots and his work there, appeared in the Belfast Telegraph today with an interview.

ETA: If you read this article be sure to click onto the 'read more' option. Matt Baggot gets a bit of a slating and the McCanns are mentioned at the end.

ETA (again) The Cambodia trip is mentioned too.

I urge people to look at the Belfast Telegraph interview IN FULL.

Gamble has covered every base from Special Branch to his love of Northern Ireland and his trip to Cambodia. Every single criticism has been addressed in what I can only deem to be a pre-planned media assault.

Q. One of the cases you have been involved in was the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. Do you think her parents Kate and Gerry will ever get the answers they crave?

A. I think Gerry and Kate McCann will get closure in my lifetime. My heart goes out to them. I never cease to be appalled by some of the things people say.

A woman on the radio earlier was more fixated that Kate and Gerry left the kids and went for a meal.

You know what? Lots of people make mistakes. Few people pay this price. Sometimes people should just think before they speak.--------------------------------------------------------------------------Hmmmmmmm. Where to 'start'?

WHY was Gamble 'so involved' in a 'missing' child 'case'?

His jurisdiction was EXPLOITED ONLINE 'protection' of 'children'

Was Madeleine being 'exploited' online?

Was Madeleine being 'preyed' upon by online 'predators'?

If NOT, then wtf was Gamble 'doing' getting 'involved'?

Does he get 'obsessivly involved' with EVERY 'missing' child 'case'?-----------------------------------------------------------"I never cease to be appalled by some of the things people say."

That's strange. When his fellow ardent McCann 'supporter' was sending death threats, to a lady, who had the temerity to not 'believe' the McCann's 'story', 'our' Jim was remarkably 'SILENT'! He was certainly NOT 'appalled' by his fellow McCann 'supporter's' vile, disgusting, illegal, death threats.--------------------------------------------------------------------------"A woman on the radio earlier was more fixated that Kate and Gerry left the kids and went for a meal."

If the McCann's had been more 'fixated' on looking after their kids, Madeleine wouldn't have gone 'missing'!-----------------------------------------------------------------"You know what? Lots of people make mistakes. Few people pay this price. Sometimes people should just think before they speak."

They don't make the SAME 'mistake', subjecting their children, diliberately and consciously, to total daily risk of harm/danger or 'worse', night after night to go out drinking with their 'friends'!

"Few people pay this price"?

The McCann's have 'made' millions of pounds, for themselves,'exploiting' Madeleine's 'disappearance' at every 'opportunity'!

That's some 'price' they 'paid'!

"Sometimes people should just think before they speak."

You mean like, saying 'the shutter was smashed' 'I entered through locked apartment front door, oh no, it was the unlocked patio door' "it was cold or was it hot?" "i was glad the investigation was closed" "it didn't matter, to us, if the investigation was ever re-opened" "I admit i personally jeopardised the investigation that sought to find out what happened to my daughter" "we did not co-operate with the police" "we lied to the police" "

Two so called professionals using twitter to score points, so childish.So much for professionalism !What does it serves though, nothing except their egoistic attention seeking need.The proof in the pudding is yet to be tested. If there is a MSM channel waiting to air her film, why not wait until it goes to air and all will then be out in the open. If it is not C-R-able then she will know her evidence is C-R proof. Otherwise she's leaving herself wide open to litigation. I dont get it - why the need to use twitter to engage in points scoring exercise when people have no way of knowing if her points can stand up to CR.

In contact with the dossier compiler can mean anything? Association with dossier compiler is not the same as proof that he colluded with her in the bad deed. We can add 2+2 from her tweets and deduce something from it, but from a legal standpoint the answer is always going to be something else that only lawyers are capable of coming up with (aided by their client). The side with the financial mean to afford C-R always will have an upper hand. That's why SP film is still awaiting legal clearance ground I suspect. Otherwise, why not just air it, instead of all this silly insinuations on twitter.

If she has proof that is not C-R-able, why isn't the MSM channel that commissioned her airing the film? What are they waiting for? A change of government?

For anyone at all interested in the true background of Jim Gamble, especially his role as Head of the SecurityServices and Intelligence in the Royal Ulster Constabulary, N. Ireland, in the 1990s, this article on the 'Good Quality Wristbands' site, written 5 years ago, is a must read':

When a person retires (resigns) from CEOP/Northern Ireland Police to go take up a new career in the protection of children online, promotes Missing People as a charity, promotes the McCanns, promotes the authors Summers and Swan, openly speaks of the UK authorities being 'too eager' to help in the disappearance of Madeleine, sells bespoke packages of assistance to businesses, sells conferences and assistance to UK educational institutions in a business that is based on 'associates'....have they actually left the security services or are they just cashing in on their experience as a senior police officer in the UK Police?

Why is there a need to go to Washington DC for anything? Gamble tweets about Northern Ireland, trips to Scotland for business. Now it's Washington DC. How big is Gamble's business?

Has Gamble left the security services?

ETA: I just want to add that I don't disagree with everything Jim Gamble has to say.

Q. One of the cases you have been involved in was the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. Do you think her parents Kate and Gerry will ever get the answers they crave?

A. I think Gerry and Kate McCann will get closure in my lifetime. My heart goes out to them. I never cease to be appalled by some of the things people say.

A woman on the radio earlier was more fixated that Kate and Gerry left the kids and went for a meal.

You know what? Lots of people make mistakes. Few people pay this price. Sometimes people should just think before they speak.

JG is so missing the point. Evidently he's the one that did not engage brain before speaking.

The Mcs are paying the price all of their own doing.They deserve to be criticised for having endangered their children, leaving them home alone in a strange environment in the dark while they went out to have adult time, hence people disgust at their behavior is valid point and justified.

In other words, had they not neglected their children, they would not be in this situation. So, why should people sympathise with negligent parents?

Not that I believed their cock and bull story. I believe Madeleine died earlier than night of charade. No neglect = no abduction,hence they were willing to state on national tv that they neglected their children. Their willing to admit that was done out of necessity to cover up a more hideous crime they'd committed, nothing to do with neglect.

Even if people believe Madeleine disappeared or died because she was taken when left alone, why did JG expect people to be sympathetic to them? He's supposed to be a law agent for safety of children.

Anyway, I don't see the point why he's going all way out to stick up particularly for the McCanns. He's getting personally tangled up and emotive over the McCanns, which is not in line with being professional and impartial.

Yep, you certainly do not see him talking of the child abuse from Kincora home, do not forget Big Jim was in the RUC you know, seems as though by news events they may be linked to numerous Deaths of people in Ireland in the troubled past? Utterly reprehensible behaviour if persons paid to protect civilians, took part in anyway of those people who were killed?

Eddie and Keela alerted to items and places concerned with the McCanns - and importantly to no other items or places.

According to Eddie and Keela, the body of Madeleine McCann lay lifeless behind the sofa in Apartment 5a, clinging to the only thing from which she could derive any comfort; a soft toy called 'Cuddle cat'.

Former Met Police Chief Lord Stevens:"There was no hard evidence because of the sheer inadequacy of the Portuguese investigation. There's absolutely no chance the parents of Madeleine McCann would be charged with her murder in this country. I've been a detective at the most senior level for 30 years and have never seen such a witch-hunt, or one based on such flimsy evidence."

Ch Insp Tavares de Almeida: "Kate and Gerald McCann are involved in the concealment of the cadaver of their daughter Madeleine McCann. From what has been established up to now, everything indicates that the McCann couple, in self-defence, doesn't want to deliver the cadaver immediately and voluntarily."

Kate's book 'madeleine', Page 219: "Did they really believe that a dog could smell the 'odour of death' three months later from a body that had been so swiftly removed?"

After forensic analysis of the 'Last Photo' there is little doubt now that the pool photo CANNOT POSSIBLY have been taken on the Thursday 3rd May, but most likely on the Sunday 29th April. So, where was Madeleine at lunchtime on Thursday? We don't know, but we can begin to "purport theories" based both on strong evidence, and lack of evidence.

Dr Gonçalo Amaral, retired PJ Coordinator: "The English can always present the conclusions to which they themselves arrived in 2007. Because they know, they have the evidence of what happened, they don't need to investigate anything. When MI5 opens their files, then we will know the truth."

Ex-Met DCI Colin Sutton: "The most likely scenario is that Madeleine was stolen to order by slave traders and smuggled into Africa for a rich family who wanted a white child."

Ex-Met DCI Andy Redwood had a "revelation moment" on BBC1's Crimewatch on 14th October 2013 when he announced that Operation Grange had eliminated the Tanner sighting - which opened up the 'window' of opportunity', in accordance with their remit, to allow the staged abduction to happen.

Tracey Kandohla: "A McCann pal told The Sun Online: "Some of the savings have been siphoned off from the Find Maddie Fund into a fixed asset account, which financial experts have advised them to do. It can be used for purchases like buying a house or building equipment."

Gerry McCann called for an example to be made of 'trolls'. SKY reporter Martin Brunt doorstepped Brenda Leyland on 2 October 2014 after a 'Dossier' was handed in to Police by McCann supporters. She was then found dead in a Leicester hotel room the next day. Brenda paid the price.