What's Going to Happen at MITB.....UNLESSS VINCE SEE"S THIS BLOG!

Alright, I haven't been keeping up with the WWE storylines as usual until the "sudden change" I've been witnessing recently. This is my MITB predictions. CM-Punk win the title, but then this is the "Money In The Bank" ppv right, so the winner of the money in the bank cashes in the title shot against Mr. Money in the bank himself, CM-Punk. CM-Punk then loses the title and John Cena isn't fired because CM-Punk is not leaving with it. So then down the road, Punk decides not to leave or decides to come back to get revenge on John Cena or whoever cashed-in on him. This would make perfect sense to the rumors of CM-Punk being burnt and taking a break.

So basically,

CM-Punk wins the WWE title

Everyone believes John Cena is now fired

Punk walks out with he title

Money-In-The-Bank winner cashes in on CM-Punk

CM-Punk loses the WWE title

John Cena is reinstated with the WWE since CM-Punk is not walking out with the title

Don't be surprised to see a screw-job

WWE is using this storyline to help promote their upcoming Montreal Screw-job DVD.

To me, the recent change in the WWE is a result of the new TNA(Hogan/Bishoff). Yeah yeah, I know I might be getting a few haters on that comment, but just think about it. CM-Punk is WWE's version of TNA's Mr. Anderson. Mr. Andersen's gimmick is all about keeping it real with an open mic, mostly doing shoot promos, and speaking the minds of the wrestling audience while repelling from authority. I always said that TNA's version of MR.Anderson, not Kennedy, wouldn't last a day in the PG WWE. That man has great mic skills, probably the best in the world today. The only difference between CM-Punk and Mr. Anderson is the fact the that Anderson is also a comedian.

What CM-Punk is doing now in the WWE, is a normal thing in TNA. If it wasn't for the move in TNA, I highly doubt that you would be seeing this move in the WWE or CM-Punk's promos for that matter.

If you think about it,
CM Punk is a ripoff of Mr. Anderson,
although I like this new CM-Punk
When was the last time you've seen someone kept it so real on the mic besides CM-Punk?........... Mr. Anderson.

Comments

I really like this blog, but I don't entirely agree that Punk is a ripoff of Anderson. I think they are both great in their own ways. The direction that Punk has taken recently really seems like something he's been wanting to do for a while. I do agree though that Punk makes it seem more real and intelligent, where Anderson does it more for comedic purposes. The main thing I want to mention though is how TNA is doing it again. If you don't know what I'm referring to, I'm talking about taking a guy (like Anderson) who is 100% money and stripping him of his draw. They already did it with the Pope, and now it's Anderson's turn. Granted, Anderson got higher than Pope with winning the title and all, but he did it all wrong. They made him heel. He was the anti-hero that we all loved or loved to hate. He was an equal opportunity asshole to heels and faces alike. He could've been the TNA version of Stone Cold Steve Austin. He had a rocket strapped to his back, and now he's gonna get lost in the mix. Why? It's all because they want to keep Sting as the headline. Now they are letting him be the crazy anti-hero that everyone is getting behind. Sting's a legend and the icon, but he's also in his 50's. TNA needs to wake up and realize they could have done the same thing with a guy 20 years younger. Hopefully one day they'll learn. All in all, good blog man. Thanks.

yo gudd blog i completely agree they are way to similar . the only thing mr anderson been like that longer than punk and way more exciting to here on da mic but i still aprciate wut punk had to say. rly gudd blog man

I really like this blog, but I don't entirely agree that Punk is a ripoff of Anderson. I think they are both great in their own ways. The direction that Punk has taken recently really seems like something he's been wanting to do for a while. I do agree though that Punk makes it seem more real and intelligent, where Anderson does it more for comedic purposes. The main thing I want to mention though is how TNA is doing it again. If you don't know what I'm referring to, I'm talking about taking a guy (like Anderson) who is 100% money and stripping him of his draw. They already did it with the Pope, and now it's Anderson's turn. Granted, Anderson got higher than Pope with winning the title and all, but he did it all wrong. They made him heel. He was the anti-hero that we all loved or loved to hate. He was an equal opportunity asshole to heels and faces alike. He could've been the TNA version of Stone Cold Steve Austin. He had a rocket strapped to his back, and now he's gonna get lost in the mix. Why? It's all because they want to keep Sting as the headline. Now they are letting him be the crazy anti-hero that everyone is getting behind. Sting's a legend and the icon, but he's also in his 50's. TNA needs to wake up and realize they could have done the same thing with a guy 20 years younger. Hopefully one day they'll learn. All in all, good blog man. Thanks.

I do understand where you are coming from but I believed that bishoff and hogan just want to make us (the fans) feel that Anderson is a complete heel now by "joining immortal". I feel, but who knows...that Anderson is going to come out as a face/heel again by screwing Immortal of something. It's just a storyline. Bishoff and Hogan like to think beyond the box. Probably using reveres psychology or some shit, who knows. And for Sting, I don't think he is the face of the company. If he is; then I would understand where you are coming from with that. He is not the World champion or anything. Anderson is the champion, remember. On the other hand., Anderson was getting kinda stale, not from my perspective but I've been seeing from the fans. So i guess they went with that move . Unlike WWE where most of the fans obviously dislike John Cena but yet the WWE refuses to acknowledge that and still keep him in the main picture and a babyface. TNA however usually acknowledges the fans when it comes to choosing a heel/babyface. Remember, Mr. Anderson debuted into TNA as a heel, but he was getting over with the fans quickly so Bishoff decided to make him into a babyface. So when Anderson starts to get over with the fans again then they probably might make him a face again.

yo gudd blog i completely agree they are way to similar . the only thing mr anderson been like that longer than punk and way more exciting to here on da mic but i still aprciate wut punk had to say. rly gudd blog man

thanxx. yess. I don't hate punk or anything......I actually like this version of punk. It's great, but I feel that if it wasn't for TNA to push the WWE then you wouldn't see this side of Punk. Like they said......"Competition is great for the business"

Love that idea. I would add to that have Alex Riley win MITB then take the title from a beaten down Punk. After that let the storyline play out that Punk, Cena and Miz try to take the title from the young wrestler.