In Maphurs v. Cooling Tower Systems, Inc. (opinion here), the plaintiff claimed that she was not paid for all of the overtime work that she performed. Then, after the plaintiff complained that she was not being paid for the overtime work, she alleges that her boss paid her some of the money, but not the rest — until the plaintiff gave into his sexual demands.

The non-coitus-related overtime fundamentals.

But, sex aside, to have a claim for overtime, a plaintiff must demonstrate that: (1) she worked overtime without compensation; and (2) the employer knew or should have known about the overtime. If the plaintiff presents enough evidence, then the burden shifts to the employer to rebut the plaintiff.

Where a plaintiff alleges that she was shorted overtime, often, time cards can be an employer’s best friend. Except, in Maphurs, the plaintiff testified that she was told by her supervisor not to record her overtime. For example, her supervisor allegedly instructed her to clock out when she worked through lunch. Facts like these enable a plaintiff, like Malphurs, to get past summary judgment and on to trial.

That holds true even without the sex-for-overtime allegations, which I’ll concede isn’t really all that germane to this post. It’s actually quite clickbait-y.

Employer takeaways.

So, let’s toss out the lede and focus on a few ways that employers can control overtime abuse:

Consider a policy requiring employees to obtain prior written approval before working overtime (and communicate that rule to employees and supervisors).

Forbid non-exempt employees from working during lunch (although, if they do, you need to pay them).

Have employees review and sign off on their weekly time entries.

Image Credit: Pixabay

CONTRIBUTOR:

Eric B. Meyer

You know that scientist in the action movie who has all the right answers if only the government would just pay attention? If you want a nerdy employment-lawyer brain to help you solve HR-compliance issues proactively before the action sequence, as a Principal Partner of a national law firm, FisherBroyles, LLP, I’m here to help. I'm not only an EEOC-approved trainer, I offer day-to-day employment counseling, workplace audits and investigations, and other prophylactic measures to keep your workplace working while you focus on running your business. And for those employers in the midst of conflict, I bring all of my know-how to bear as your zealous advocate. I’m a trial-tested, experienced litigator that has represented companies of all sizes in a veritable alphabet soup of employment law claims, such as the ADA, ADEA, CEPA, FMLA, FLSA, NJLAD, PHRA, Title VII, and USERRA. I also help clients litigate disputes involving restrictive covenants such as non-competition and non-solicitation agreements, as well as conflicts over use of trade secrets and other confidential information. For more about me, my practice, and my firm, click on my full bio.