FNB Housing Affordability Review 2014 could be the year when residential affordability starts to deteriorate once more 3 April 2014.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "FNB Housing Affordability Review 2014 could be the year when residential affordability starts to deteriorate once more 3 April 2014."— Presentation transcript:

1
FNB Housing Affordability Review 2014 could be the year when residential affordability starts to deteriorate once more 3 April 2014

2
Residential Affordability Overview To assess home affordability, the key factors to evaluate against incomes and interest rate levels are house price trends, rates and tariffs trends, maintenance and repair cost trends, affordability relative to “rival” consumer goods and services, and the cost of credit. Key affordability measures, i.e. Average House Price/Average Remuneration Ratio, the Average Installment Repayment Value on the Average Priced House/Average Remuneration Ratio, and the Debt-Service Ratio, saw their improving trends end in 2013 The end of the improvement was due to the combination of mildly accelerated house price growth, slower average remuneration growth, and no further interest rate cuts. Looking into 2014, it is likely that we will see all 3 of these affordability measures deteriorating mildly, with wage bill growth under pressure in a weak economy, house price growth having started the year higher, and interest rates now in a rising phase of the cycle. It looks unlikely that housing affordability will meaningfully narrow the gap with consumer goods and services affordability in the near term though. The home-related Municipal Rates, Tariffs, Maintenance and Repairs Affordability measure remained on its long term trend of deterioration in This trend may, however, flatten out, as we have been witnessing slowing Rates and Tariff inflation rates in recent times. But the overall affordability picture for 2014 looks set to be one of mild deterioration, and this informs our expectation that, later in the year, house price inflation may once again start to slow mildly, weighed down a little by such a general affordability deterioration.

3
Estimates of Home Buying Affordability As at the 3rd quarter of last year, the improving trend in affordability that had started in 2008 appeared to have all but ended. The 1st affordability measure, namely the Average House Price/Average Employee Remuneration Index rose (deteriorated) slightly by +0.2% in the 3rd quarter of The 2nd measure, namely the “Instalment Payment Value on a new 100% Bond on the Average Priced House/Average Employee Remuneration Ratio” Index, also rose by +0.2% in the 3rd quarter. Both indices driven slightly higher by the combination of accelerating house price growth and slower growth in average employee remuneration. At this stage, however, the quarterly rise is very small, and the affordability levels still far improved on the highs of “in-affordability” experienced back around 2007/8.

4
Rates rising, house Price growth faster, but employee remuneration under pressure In 2014 we expect rising interest rates to be negative for home affordability. The other 2 factors that also threaten to be negatives for home affordability are mildly faster house price growth of late (8% year-on- year by the 1 st quarter of 2014) And there is also the possibility that labour remuneration growth continues to struggle in a weak economy. StatsSA labour data recently showed a further slowing in estimated Average Monthly Employee earnings growth, from 5.8% year- on-year in the 3rd quarter to 4.3% in the 4th quarter.

5
Home running cost-related affordability still deteriorating (rising) It is also important to consider measures of affordability that are related to the home, i.e. those that are running cost related. Unlike home buying-related affordability measures which saw improvement from , 3rd quarter2013 Municipal Rates, Tariffs, Maintenance and Repairs/Average Employee Remuneration Index merely continued on its broad rising trend which it has sustained throughout the period. This affordability measure is 3.6% above its level at the beginning of 2008, having been driven higher largely by high inflation in the area of municipal rates and tariffs

6
“Competitor” Affordability Then there is the matter of the “competitiveness” of housing versus consumer goods and services that compete for household disposable income. Relative to where we started back in 2000, at the start of the housing and consumer booms, housing is significantly worse off today. Despite Average House Price/Average Remuneration Index having improved (declined) quite dramatically to a 112 by the 3rd quarter of 2013, the Average Consumer Price/Average Remuneration had dropped as low as 70.25, having never really risen in the 1st place during the boom years of

7
Household Credit Affordability Finally, there is the matter of credit affordability, which is a function of how much credit is outstanding, the level of disposable income, and of course the prevailing level of interest rates. The best measure of the affordability of Household Sector credit is the Household Debt-Service Ratio (The cost of servicing the household sector debt burden, expressed as a percentage of Household Sector Disposable Income). The SARB’s “interest only” version of this ratio, like the 2 housing affordability indices, had more-or-less stabilized in 2013, and looks set to rise mildly in 2014 as interest rates rise.