2016-02-07
Tel-­Aviv Magistrate Court Judge
Bosni is asked to clarify whether she is engaged and fraud and
criminality in favor of a bank executive...//

The
court file is of particular interest. In it Judge Efrat Bosni
purportedly granted Bank HaPoalim CEO Zion Kenan “Restraining Order
against Threatening Harassment” against Anti Banking Fraud activist
Attorney Haim Barak Cohen. The “Decision” was described by
Israeli media as “redefining the limits of Freedom of Speech”.
However, growing evidence shows that Judge Efrat Bosni engaged in the
conduct of sham/simulated court process in this court file, and the
publication of sham/simulated judicial records – Fraud Upon the
Court. The essence of such conduct is in defrauding a person to submit to the authority of a record, which appears as a court record, but in fact is an invalid, sham court record, lacking any authority at all. Such conduct is well-known worldwide for generations as criminality by judges, which is not covered by any immunity - since it is Extra-judicial Conduct. However, the recent Judge Varda AlSheikh "Reconstructed Protocol" affair, and Judge Hila Cohen "Fabricated Protocols" affair show that Israeli judges see such matter differently... This
court file also provides unique evidence of the serious effects of
the fundamental fraud in development and operation of Net-HaMishpat –
the new IT system of the Israeli courts.Parts of today's Request, filed with Judge Efrat Bosni of the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court are copied below the Hebrew text.

Figure:
a. Bank HaPoalim CEO is routinely chased by activists
yelling “Thief, Thief”. b. Attorney Barak Cohen is
one of the leaders of the anti-banksters protest group in Israel. c.
Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court Judge Efrat Bosni issued in June 2015 a
“Restraining Order” prohibiting “Threatening Harassment” by
Attorney Cohen in response to request by CEO Keynan. Such “Order”
amounted to Prior Restraint – prohibiting Cohen from writing or
saying anything about Keynan anywhere. The Order was described by
Israeli media as “redefining the limits of Freedom of
Expression”... However, no authentic copy of the “Order” is to
be found... The entire court file was placed under fictitious
“sealing”. Now, that the “sealing” is removed, the
underlying fraud is openly visible.

Excerpts from the Request, filed today in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court:

Instant
Request is filed “Pro
Forma”, and there
should have been no need to file
it, or
justify it. The filing
of instant Request is necessitated since the entire body of facts and
records in Net-HaMishpat (case management and public access system of
the Court) in instant court file raise concerns, which lend
themselves to only a limited
number of plausible explanations:

(1)
The records in Net-HaMishpat in instant court file reflect human
errors – which resulted in the unlawful denial of public access to
public judicial records.

(2)
The records in Net-HaMishpat in instant court file reflect fraud,
perversion of court process, and breach of loyalty by Judge Efrat
Bosni – intended to
unlawfully deprive Freedom
of Expression and
Freedom of Demonstration
– which are deemed constitutional rights, through serious
violations of Human Rights, including the right for “fair, public
hearing”.

(3)
The circumstances in instant court file lend themselves to other
reasonable explanations, which Judge Efrat Bosni may provide in her
response to instant Request.

Instant
Request is filed with the expectation that Judge Bosni's conduct in
response to instant Request would demonstrate correction of human
errors, if there were any, in a manner that would permit public
access to inspect the requested court records in Net-HaMishpat.
Alternatively – it is expected that Judge Bosni respond in any
manner that would appear to her in compliance with the law and
strengthening public trust in her own integrity and integrity of the
courts.

In
other words: Instant request is filed in order to allow the
Requester, the parties and the public at large to distinguish between
explanations (1), (2), and (3), above.

1.
Instant court file holds the highest public policy significance,
since in the June 25, 2015 “Decision” record, suspected
fabricated/simulated
court record, Judge Efrat Bosni purportedly granted Bank HaPoalim CEO
Zion Keynan “Restraining Order against Threatening Harassment”
against Anti BankingFraud
activist Attorney Haim Barak Cohen. Such record was described by
media, which related to it as an authentic, valid, enforceable court
record, “re-defining the limits of Freedom of Expression”. [1]
Likewise, it re-defined the limits of the Freedom of Demonstration.
Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Demonstration are fundamental
rights, which are considered constitutional in other nations, and
fundamental rights in any civil society.

2.
The June 25, 2015 Judge Efrat Bosni “Decision” record fails to
appear in the “Decisions Docket” in Net-HaMishpat, but was widely
published as an authentic, valid and enforceable court record in
instant court file. [2]
It is also obvious that
Attorney Haim Barak Cohen, other social protest activists, and the
media believe that it is an authentic, valid and enforceable court
record, and that Attorney Cohen should accept its authority. With it
– the authenticity of such court record is dubious at best.

b)
The February 4, 2016 “Hearing” in instant court file, in the
courtroom of Judge Efrat Bosni in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court, on
Request to Extend the “Restraining Order against Threatening
Harassment” - fails to appear in the “Court Calendar” and the
“Case Calendar” in Net-HaMishpat – is suspect
fabricated/simulated court hearing.

3.
On February 4, 2016 in the
afternoon, an event took place in Judge Efrat Bosni's courtroom in
the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court, in which Bank HaPoalim CEO Zion
Keynan, his Counsel, Anti
BankingFraud
activist Attorney Haim Barak Cohen, and
members of the public at large participated, and where I was present.Such event was not “behind
closed doors”, and was not “sealed” - as publicly announced by
Judge Efrat Bosni herself during the event.

4.
There is no doubt that Judge Efrat Bosni's conduct during such event
was intended to cause Attorney Cohen, CEO Keynan and others to
believe that event was an authentic court hearing of the Tel-Aviv
Magistrate Court in instant court file, pursuant to the law of the
State of Israel.

5.
Likewise, there is no doubt that Jude Efrat Bosni's conduct during
such event was intended to cause Attorney Cohen, CEO Keynan and
others to believe that in such event CEO Keynan's Request to Extend
the June 25, 2015 “Restraining
Order against Threatening Harassment” against
Attorney Cohen was lawfully being reviewed in instant court file.

6.
Likewise, there is no doubt
that that Jude Efrat Bosni's
conduct during such event was intended to cause Attorney Cohen, CEO
Keynan and others to believe that the June 25, 2015 “Restraining
Order against Threatening Harassment” against
Attorney Cohen in instant
court file was an authentic, valid and enforceable court record,
pursuant to the law of the State of Israel.

7.
On the the hand, such event fails to appear as
a “Hearing” in the Court
Calendar in Net-HaMishpat. The figure, above, is printout (carried
out on February 6, 2016) of the Court Calendar in Net-HaMishpat,
pertaining to Judge Efrat Bosni and February 4, 2016. The Court
Calendar fails to show any “Hearing”
in instant court file on February 4, 2016.

It
should be noted that Court Calendar is universally deemed one of the
Books of Court of any competent court, which define the scope of the
lawful conduct of a given court.

8.
The above referenced even also fails to appear as a “Hearing” in
the Case Calendar in Net-HaMishpat. [3]

....

h)
The conduct of fabricated/simulated court process and the publication
of fabricated/simulated court records are well-known criminal conduct
by judges, which is not covered by any immunity.

21.
The combination
of circumstances and evidence, outlined above, raise serious concerns
that Judge Efrat Bosni has conducted fabricated/simulated
court process in instant court file, and caused the publication of
fabricated/simulated
court record. Such conduct is well-known worldwide as criminal
conduct by judges and others. Such conduct is deemed “Extra-judicial
Conduct” and therefore is not covered by any immunity.

In
instant court file, the serious concern is that such conduct was
intended to unlawfully deprive constitutional rights of the highest
significance – Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Demonstration -
through the blatant violation of fundamental Constitutional and Human
Rights, including the right for “fair, public hearing”.

11-12-10 Where should Occupy go next? Civil Disobedience in the footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!http:// www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/12-06-08 Courts and Judges as racketeering enterprises under RICO (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - key element in the current financial crisishttp://www.scribd.com/doc/96504009/Secede! The US in its current form is simply unmanageable...

What did the experts say?

* דוח סייג לזכויות האדם נכלל בדוח התקופתי של האו"ם לגבי זכויות האדם בישראל (2013), בלוויית ההערה: "חוסר יושרה בכתבים האלקטרוניים של בית המשפט העליון, בתי המשפט המחוזיים, ובתי הדין למוחזקי משמורת בישראל".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2010 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in the United States, with the note: "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2013 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in Israel, with the note: "lack of integrity of the electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel."

The United States

* "...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* Los Angeles County is"the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud."FBI (2004)

* “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000)

* “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.”Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/239647129/The HRA submission was incorporated into the 2015 HRC Professional Staff Report on the United States with the note: :“HRA NGO recommended restoring the integrity of the IT systems of the courts, under accountability to the Congress, with the goal of making such systems as transparent as possible to the public at large.”

[2] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2013 UPR of the State of Israel was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Lack of integrity in the electronic record systems of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees' courts in Israel".

2012-06-04 Human Right Alert's Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the

[3] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2010 UPR of the United States was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."

2010-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the

2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:

[1] 10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States, where Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission was incorporated with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/http://www.scribd.com/doc/108663259/