FREE HEALTHCARE -

IRONY - Life is more sacred on other planets?

Phil8192 - April 18, 2014, 11:15 am

"Mars" and "Earth" should have been capitalized.

terroraustralis - September 30, 2012, 3:12 am

i get that you dont like the idea of dead babies, but the alternative is a life of suffering, hardship and a "THE GOVERNMENT ARE OUR PARENTS! BECAUSE OUR REAL PARENTS SUCK! I LOVE FREE GOVERNMENT MONEY!" type philosophy when they become adults.

terroraustralis - September 30, 2012, 3:10 am

thats not ironic at all, whats ironic is that you'd want children to be raised by parents who, if not for government interference, would have killed them. i'd rather be dead than totally dependent on parents who wished i was never born.

ipaprime - September 30, 2012, 12:13 am

no unwanted babies are the product of people who put their pleasure befor their responsabilities (cant seem to spell 2day sry)

GrouchoMarxist - September 29, 2012, 6:52 am

The only irony here is that you had to be born to in order to be pro-abortion.

GrouchoMarxist - September 29, 2012, 6:50 am

That's the thing... You don't get pick the out comes.. Still Margret Sanger was targeting the weak and inferior .... as she saw them.

terroraustralis - September 28, 2012, 3:22 am

actually, no, i hope you live, and spend the rest of your life in hospital, begging for some kind of compensation or pension from the republican congress you so adore...

terroraustralis - September 28, 2012, 3:16 am

its cool man, i hope mitt goes to war with iran, puts you in the draft, and says "it was a neccesary sacrifice" when you get blown up by a roadside bomb without having ever fired a sh**.

Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 28, 2012, 12:47 am

Or this Guy?

GrouchoMarxist - September 27, 2012, 9:13 pm

(ADMIN EDIT) This comment has been DELETED in violation of site rules. Keep it civil or you will be banned. This is a warning.

terroraustralis - September 27, 2012, 2:48 pm

all the arguments against taxation and welfare, wholly support abortion. and all the arguments against abortion apply to welfare. both sides beleive in the logic, they just apply it to different things, and ignore the other situations where it applies.

terroraustralis - September 27, 2012, 2:46 pm

an unwanted baby provides the same situation for an individual. they must give up a significant portion of their life and livelihood to support something they dont want to support. a fetus dies without its mother, and unemployed starve without welfare.

terroraustralis - September 27, 2012, 2:45 pm

personally i like the taxpayer welfare a***ogy. conservatives dont want their taxes going to welfare, because they dont like supporting leeches that give nothing back to the community, but:

terroraustralis - September 27, 2012, 2:44 pm

well, firstly, one sustains itself from its own environment, the other is entirely dependent on its mother. one is "self sustaining life", and the other would cease to be if not for its parental support.

GrouchoMarxist - September 9, 2012, 5:23 am

I've got a copy of a discussion with a moonbat liberal from the other night. He could spew all the talking points. When given facts he could do nothing but offer his FOX lies lines.. Once they say the talking point they are done. It's all they got

arnnatz - September 9, 2012, 2:20 am

StarryEyedGuy needs to go to Daily Kos for the "Lie List" since liberals don't actually know what they are repeating

Senile Socialist -

OTC - September 22, 2015, 11:38 pm

Well, he didn't say "paid" vacation

LIBERAL INTELLIGENCE? - Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D.-Fla.), chairwoman of the DNC stated, that Republicans believe illegal immigration â€œshould in fact be a crime.â€ What part of illegal does she not get?

RonaldReagan - June 11, 2015, 4:54 pm

Funny

WTFO - December 10, 2013, 12:53 am

I'd enjoy hearing how this is out of context. However, here it is on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUqJO6sk7AA at about the 30 second mark. Not out of context, she's an idiot that doesn't understand entering the US illegally is a crime.

birddseedd - November 28, 2013, 8:16 pm

I think this is something that is being taken out of context. facts are not facts unless stated IN context

WTFO - April 7, 2013, 11:12 pm

Sorry there was a typo in my #51584 post. I meant to say "her ignorance is NOT representative of every liberal". However, as stated her role as DNC chair is to forward the majority opinion of her party.

politicz - April 7, 2013, 11:28 am

So you are implying that all liberals follow her? Why is it that every time I argue with someone here, the people I argue against use the generalization fallacy.

Renza - April 7, 2013, 1:47 am

lol, so was I. the formatting/placement of these comments can be so weird.

WTFO - April 7, 2013, 1:46 am

I was responding the politicz, not you. Sorry for the confusion.

Renza - April 7, 2013, 1:41 am

I believe you may be misinterpreting the joke... I'm not saying you did say anything, I'm saying if we did the same thing as the poster, and were to generalize republicans based off of Palin, seeing them make posters like this would appear common place.

WTFO - April 7, 2013, 1:16 am

While her ignorance is representative of every liberal, she is a leading voice in her party and is in charge of forwarding their agenda.

WTFO - April 7, 2013, 1:04 am

As the head of the DNC, she is a representative of liberalism in the Dem party.

politicz - April 6, 2013, 5:39 pm

Strawman fallacy. I never said that.

Renza - April 6, 2013, 12:16 pm

if you base republicans off of sara palin, it shouldn't be too big of surprise.

YOU MIGHT BE A LIBERAL - if you want to legalize dope but ban happy meals.

LIBERAL TO DO LIST -

Scramblus - October 5, 2013, 6:06 pm

I see you're still quite upset after your mutually embarrassing argument with basically a liberal version of you so I'm not mad. I'll even forget you're post didnt really relate to anything.
my jimmies are unrustled.

StoneTools - October 5, 2013, 10:26 am

I see you couldn't come up with an intelligent comment, so you just spew whatever crosses your little mind, eh? (I added the "eh?" so that mooo would understand the sentence a little better)

Scramblus - October 5, 2013, 3:34 am

Considering the number of posts on this site b****ing endlessly about liberals.....pot calling the kettle black anyone?

HazelBrown - April 20, 2015, 11:40 am

A beast. What should be done with him?

LIBERAL - and damn proud of it.

RonaldReagan - January 9, 2014, 10:04 pm

The problem is that there are not men of the caliber of JFK or Reagan still kicking around. McCain wasn't half bad. Christie has promise too. Don't mind Lieberman all that much either.

birddseedd - November 28, 2013, 10:33 pm

Liberal back then meant a fair chance for everyone, Liberal now means giving an advantage to those who chose to be lower class, and a hindrance for those who actually work hard to create a good life for their families

NEW TAX COMING - Obama has decided to tax Aspirin heavily After all it's white and it works

LIBERAL HYPOCRISY 101 -

GLOBAL WARMING MYTH - Green Liberals state that Global Warming is endangering polar bears. However, the fact is that their numbers have increased from 5K to 25K since 1970. Consider that another liberal lie debunked!

crankyhead - August 30, 2013, 5:36 pm

No kidding.

crankyhead - August 30, 2013, 5:26 pm

You're the only person who's spoken about the incident in a positive light, OTC. For the third time now, just sayin'.

crankyhead - August 30, 2013, 5:24 pm

ST, you could be standing at the North Pole, with orders to march south, and you still wouldn't be able to point in the right direction.

StoneTools - August 30, 2013, 3:10 pm

The court reports mention todd being armed with a pistol, not an a**ault rifle

StoneTools - August 30, 2013, 3:08 pm

you left out part of your sentence, it should have been "managed to shoot over 40 unarmed people in 5 minutes"

OTC - August 30, 2013, 3:05 pm

You talking about the point that some one shooting a closely gathered group of unarmed people inside a building is not that huge of an accomplishment as you seem to think it is?

StoneTools - August 30, 2013, 2:31 pm

try reading threads before you post a reply on a comment, please. It's getting to be really old when I have to keep pointing you in the right direction.

crankyhead - August 30, 2013, 1:42 pm

Who ST?

crankyhead - August 30, 2013, 1:28 pm

OTC, in order for me to miss your point, you actually have to have a point.

StoneTools - August 30, 2013, 1:06 am

and he was armed with an a**ault rifle as you stated in your poster?

OTC - August 29, 2013, 11:37 pm

As usual, you missed the point, and I'm obtuse?

crankyhead - August 29, 2013, 1:08 pm

... promoting, pursuing or pushing his agenda. Clear enough?

crankyhead - August 29, 2013, 1:07 pm

Are you really so obtuse that you believe I'm trying to glorify him? I'm gonna say this once, for you OTC, because apparently you can't figure it out on your own. I don't respect any man who resorts to violence, or threats of violence, as a means for...

crankyhead - August 29, 2013, 1:05 pm

...and nope.

crankyhead - August 29, 2013, 1:05 pm

Nope.

crankyhead - August 29, 2013, 1:05 pm

The court reports are online OTC.

OTC - August 28, 2013, 4:32 pm

So, was Mark Todd inside or outside the building when the shooting started?

OTC - August 28, 2013, 4:31 pm

So, was Mark Todd inside or outside the building when the shooting started?

StoneTools - August 28, 2013, 1:39 pm

and it doesn't make the professionally trained, UNARMED soldiers armed either, does it?

StoneTools - August 28, 2013, 1:38 pm

correct, but it still doesn't make Mark Todd armed with an a**ault rifle, now does it?

OTC - August 28, 2013, 1:08 pm

You mean a coward who sh** a closely gathered group of unsuspecting unarmed soldiers?

crankyhead - August 28, 2013, 12:03 pm

Thank you for admitting that it is possible, for one heavily armed man, to shoot four dozen professionally trained soldiers, with a pistol, in under 5 minutes.

StoneTools - August 27, 2013, 4:46 pm

You might want to look up the FN Five Seven pistol. It's not your every day, run of the mill pistol. It takes 20 and 30 round magazines and he had around 400 rounds on him in those 20 and 30 round magazines.

crankyhead - August 27, 2013, 1:37 pm

... the walk-in refrigerator. Simple enough, or do I need to dumb that down some more?

crankyhead - August 27, 2013, 1:36 pm

Can't speak for all liberals here OTC, but if you were to ask me, I'd say that no, I don't believe that. I do, however, believe that an army base, as a general rule, would have more weapons present in it's armories, than say, a Chucky Cheese has, in...

crankyhead - August 27, 2013, 1:34 pm

Speaking of ignorant, what kind of weapon was Hasan armed with, when he managed to shoot over 40 people in under 5 minutes? What kind of weapon was he using, that left some 200 spent shell casings littered all over the ground?

OTC - August 27, 2013, 1:15 pm

Do liberals really think soldiers on military bases are armed 24/7, sleep with, eat with, and perform daily duties with their weapons on hand?

StoneTools - August 26, 2013, 11:26 pm

do tell how your definition of heavily armed applies to someone with a pistol. The stupid idea here is that hasan was surrounded by heavily armed soldiers during his shooting spree

StoneTools - August 26, 2013, 11:21 pm

Does that mean that you are finally willing to admit that you are full of crap about the poster yet? Or are you still going to prove your ignorance.

crankyhead - August 26, 2013, 8:12 pm

As for the other one; Surrounded: The relationship that your mind shares with stupid ideas.

crankyhead - August 26, 2013, 8:11 pm

Fine. Heavily armed, to me, means being armed well enough to injure three dozen soldiers, and kill another thirteen all by your lonesome, on the largest military base in North America, in under 5 minutes. Clear enough for ya, or should I dumb that down?

StoneTools - August 26, 2013, 9:03 am

CH, define heavily armed, then define surround. I think, if you are honest for the first time on this site, you will find that Todd was neither heavily armed nor surrounding hasan. So that means you, once again, are full of it.

crankyhead - August 26, 2013, 8:25 am

ST, I got two words for ya: Sergeant Todd.

StoneTools - August 24, 2013, 2:20 pm

Let me translate that for you: Why use facts when you can act like crankyhead and just spew bs and try to weasel out of explaining the stupidity of it (see his "surrounded by heavily armed soldiers" poster and subsequent *** dancing

crankyhead - August 24, 2013, 12:01 pm

Why use data at all, when you have unsubstantiated opinion, to use in it's place? #sarcasm

Scramblus - August 24, 2013, 8:09 am

Global warming isnt the primary cause of previous population declines. It's an anticipated one for future ecological problems. But why use science when you can Cherry pick data?

I'LL SHOW YOU GUN CONTROL! - GUN-CONTROL! ...without it, we would miss who we were shooting at! Gun Control means using both hands

liberal children need dependency -

LIBERAL: TYPE I - The Progressive Elite. Views stem from ideological theories versus reality. See Americans as idiots who can't take care of themselves. Usually never held a job outside of universities or Hollywood.

AL GORE'S NEW CRIB - Why would anyone who claims that the oceans are going to rise 20 feet buy a $9M ocean-front villa in Montecito, CA. Unless of course, they know that claim is complete BS.

LIBERAL DEMOCRAT WAR HEROES -

foxrecon19d - June 5, 2014, 12:52 pm

It's nice to see how liberals "suggest" something and automatically it becomes fact. I suggest that the soldiers who served with Bergdahl know far more about the facts than pro-Obama talking point echo chambers desperately trying to save the Democrats

fauxnews - June 5, 2014, 11:51 am

In fact, a review of the database of casualties in the Afghan war suggests that Sergeant Bergdahl's critics appear to be blaming him for every American soldier killed in Paktika Province in the four-month period that followed his disappearance. Herpa derp

fauxnews - June 5, 2014, 11:51 am

The furious search for Sergeant Bergdahl, his critics say, led to the deaths of at least 2 soldiers and possibly 6 others in the area. Pentagon officials say those charges are unsubstantiated and are not supported by a review of a database of causalities

EmmaRoydes - June 4, 2014, 3:31 pm

There's an article on thepeoplescube.com about obama trading the rest of the gitmo prisoners for magic beans.