tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.comments2018-02-28T18:57:38.343-08:00Rob Davies - Microservices through Continuous ImprovementRob Daviesnoreply@blogger.comBlogger60125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-44254591393569055602015-01-15T01:30:37.832-08:002015-01-15T01:30:37.832-08:00Messages to be scheduled have one of the following...Messages to be scheduled have one of the following properties set - this is checked by the SchedulerBroker (part of the ActiveMQ Broker):<br /><br />&quot;AMQ_SCHEDULED_DELAY&quot;<br /> &quot;AMQ_SCHEDULED_PERIOD&quot;<br /> &quot;AMQ_SCHEDULED_CRON&quot;<br /><br />When they are moved from the ScheduleStore to be processed as normal by the broker, these properties are removed.Rob Davieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08525735841110843594noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-34362772766785079912015-01-15T00:52:27.856-08:002015-01-15T00:52:27.856-08:00Is there any way to check if the message has been ...Is there any way to check if the message has been already scheduled (to avoid duplicates)?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-25901119717327072392014-11-07T01:05:26.791-08:002014-11-07T01:05:26.791-08:00Hi Hendy,
So which one is correct?
A. Kubernetes...Hi Hendy,<br /><br /><i><br />So which one is correct?<br />A. Kubernetes replaced ZooKeeper<br />B. Kubernetes complemented ZooKeeper<br />C. ZooKeeper is used only for the Java variant of Fabric8 v2, but not for the main variant</i><br /><br />All of the above! In Fabric8 v1, we used Zookeeper for both service discovery, and cluster coordination (master/slave elections etc). Kubernetes completely replaces the service discovery part (it uses etcd underneath the covers). In the 100% Java implementation we replace the etcd functionality with Zookeeper currently, though we aim to make that pluggable. However, we still need to use something like Zookeeper for the cluster coordination, so we have that as a separate service that&#39;s deployed. There will be some examples of using that for master/slave camel routes and control of ActiveMQ clusters in the quickstarts over the next couple of weeks.<br />Rob Davieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08525735841110843594noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-32384218143635627432014-11-07T00:58:49.001-08:002014-11-07T00:58:49.001-08:00Hi Richard,
&quot;We have a lot of services (prop...Hi Richard,<br /><br /><i>&quot;We have a lot of services (properties, features, bundles) deployed using Fabric V1 using profiles. What is the recommended way to deploy these now? Should we deploy using vanilla Karaf on Fabric V2?&quot;</i><br /><br />We are working on migration tools - which will convert Profiles into the new App template. Migration between v1 and v2 will be relatively straight forward. For Fabric v2 - you can certainly use vanilla karaf too. <br /><br /><i>&quot;Is V1 dead, and will there be any further development?</i><br />There wont be new features added to v1 - but it will still be maintained.<br /><br /><i>&quot;Will the next version of JBoss Fuse support V1 or V2, and what about future versions of JBoss Fuse?&quot;</i><br />There&#39;s always a lag between community and product. Right now the next version of JBoss Fuse (6.2) s going to support v1, but I would hope it will end up supporting both versions of fabric8. Versions after Fuse 6.2 will probably be Fabric8 v2 only - but that&#39;s still being decided, based on customer feedback.Rob Davieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08525735841110843594noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-72462115373636594972014-11-06T17:20:32.801-08:002014-11-06T17:20:32.801-08:00Congrats for the release!
So which one is correct...Congrats for the release!<br /><br />So which one is correct?<br />A. Kubernetes replaced ZooKeeper<br />B. Kubernetes complemented ZooKeeper<br />C. ZooKeeper is used only for the Java variant of Fabric8 v2, but not for the main variant<br />Hendy Irawanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05192845149798446052noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-41669951428156246462014-11-06T15:02:54.243-08:002014-11-06T15:02:54.243-08:00Hi Rob,
Few questions:
1. We have a lot of serv...Hi Rob,<br /><br />Few questions: <br /><br />1. We have a lot of services (properties, features, bundles) deployed using Fabric V1 using profiles. What is the recommended way to deploy these now? Should we deploy using vanilla Karaf on Fabric V2?<br /><br />2. Is V1 dead, and will there be any further development?<br /><br />3. Will the next version of JBoss Fuse support V1 or V2, and what about future versions of JBoss Fuse?<br /><br />Thanks,<br />Richard<br />Richard Davidsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12923822432978710075noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-46760783544392855222014-02-04T09:50:11.252-08:002014-02-04T09:50:11.252-08:00Any news for 2014 Rob? I would like to attend as i...Any news for 2014 Rob? I would like to attend as in the last years...<br /><br />Best,<br />ChristianChristian Muellerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15937442820564689792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-13753721111849215592014-01-21T04:00:18.905-08:002014-01-21T04:00:18.905-08:00I was under the impression that Apollo will coexis...I was under the impression that Apollo will coexist with ActiveMQ. Especially, I read in the AMQ website that Apollo will form the core of AMQ6.0. Is this not true?Mahesh Nhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12416448558301422055noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-28725541495533038252013-09-11T01:24:35.454-07:002013-09-11T01:24:35.454-07:00Hi Rob... any news on this event?
Cheers,
F.Hi Rob... any news on this event?<br />Cheers,<br />F.ralhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06027543164380726845noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-56549042634813935012013-08-21T02:24:38.737-07:002013-08-21T02:24:38.737-07:00I&#39;m in!I&#39;m in!Christian Reichelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12369416009631579272noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-35585305905750938572013-01-20T23:43:21.567-08:002013-01-20T23:43:21.567-08:00This is a great timeline. And sure impressive for ...This is a great timeline. And sure impressive for how many years Fuse have done/does integration.<br /><br />Though I wonder if Apache Karaf as a project is that old. I would assume it was years later it became a project, out of ServiceMix. Guillaume blogs here about Karaf in 2009: http://gnodet.blogspot.se/2009/04/apache-karaf.html<br /><br />I guess if you do any updates in the upcoming years you would have to add Apollo and HawtIO as they are great projects as well.Claus Ibsenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17434564836989249540noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-85786372447594366262012-12-26T06:49:33.290-08:002012-12-26T06:49:33.290-08:00At what point does the statistics queue gets destr...At what point does the statistics queue gets destroyed ? I dont see any point in having this queue after client connection is terminated.Chilla Sridharhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06394570780846153511noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-16301436160088199992012-12-26T06:47:09.093-08:002012-12-26T06:47:09.093-08:00The above code is creating statistics queue. When ...The above code is creating statistics queue. When will it get destroyed ? I dont see any point in having this queue on broker after client connection exits.Chilla Sridharhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06394570780846153511noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-71855503722620589852012-12-26T06:43:30.069-08:002012-12-26T06:43:30.069-08:00The above code is creating statistics queue which ...The above code is creating statistics queue which is not temporary. I dont see any point in existance of this queue after the client connection exits. Will it get destroyed automatically at broker exit?.Chilla Sridharhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06394570780846153511noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-74219037930666254602012-12-21T05:20:51.401-08:002012-12-21T05:20:51.401-08:00Hi i tried MQTT in activemq. For dynamic topic and...Hi i tried MQTT in activemq. For dynamic topic and bridging, it does well. Tried some hands on programs too.<br /><br />For the application I am working on we need support for wild card filtering.<br /><br />e.g. <br />Consider a GPS application sending location to server using MQTT.<br />truck 1 sends to &quot;gps/truck/123/location&quot; whereas truck 2 sends to &quot;gps/truck/456/location&quot;<br /><br />The server subscribers to &quot;gps/truck/+/location&quot; so that it can receive messages from both the trucks.<br /><br />I could not do that with Activemq but RSMB supports that.<br /><br />I would be glad if you have any idea on wildcard filtering.Jay Rajanihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02800033024440908594noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-44868405916584466222012-05-26T14:01:17.422-07:002012-05-26T14:01:17.422-07:00I started poking around today to enable mqtt funct...I started poking around today to enable mqtt functionality? couldn&#39;t find much by grepping confs. Can you point to an example? Thanks.holla2040https://www.blogger.com/profile/06944456261554780078noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-27532739735224274402012-05-13T02:28:14.751-07:002012-05-13T02:28:14.751-07:00Hi rob,
The following are the properties that i s...Hi rob,<br /><br />The following are the properties that i saw in LevelDBScore.scala<br /><br />directory<br />logDirectory<br />logSize<br />indexFactory<br />sync<br />verifyChecksums<br />indexMaxOpenFiles<br />indexBlockRestartInterval<br />paranoidChecks<br />indexWriteBufferSize<br />indexBlockSize<br />indexCompression<br />logCompression<br />indexCacheSize<br />flushDelay<br />asyncBufferSize<br />monitorStats<br />failIfLocked<br /><br /><br />Can you explain the meaning and what are the preferrable values for the above ..D.Radhakrishnannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-24775244256384701432012-04-20T05:28:36.059-07:002012-04-20T05:28:36.059-07:00This is goodness, and I&#39;m pleased to see more ...This is goodness, and I&#39;m pleased to see more MQTT server implementations (including, as you mention, the interop with other protocols). It will be nice when ActiveMQ / Apollo also provide the MQTT dynamic topic and bridging features that RSMB, WMQ and mosquitto all support so that these things can be federated.Andy Piperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07666427891464758843noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-15637773889180867162012-04-20T05:28:25.929-07:002012-04-20T05:28:25.929-07:00This is goodness, and I&#39;m pleased to see more ...This is goodness, and I&#39;m pleased to see more MQTT server implementations (including, as you mention, the interop with other protocols). It will be nice when ActiveMQ / Apollo also provide the MQTT dynamic topic and bridging features that RSMB, WMQ and mosquitto all support so that these things can be federated.Andy Piperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07666427891464758843noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-18684189369785928882012-02-03T12:53:40.473-08:002012-02-03T12:53:40.473-08:00awesome work. I can&#39;t wait to try this out!awesome work. I can&#39;t wait to try this out!jamie archibaldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02961748694485143625noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-16497335179796286792011-09-15T17:21:43.990-07:002011-09-15T17:21:43.990-07:00Rob, I notice there was some talk of ActiveMQ Bla...Rob, I notice there was some talk of ActiveMQ Blaze. Is that embedded in the latest release or is a future still?alex314http://alex314.myid.net/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-64773107850211225262010-10-27T07:26:53.652-07:002010-10-27T07:26:53.652-07:00Congratulations to you all. Have fun!
Regards Nig...Congratulations to you all. Have fun!<br /><br />Regards NigelNigel Thomashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10826219818302312878noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-78873417951298234952010-10-15T23:15:02.103-07:002010-10-15T23:15:02.103-07:00Messages are usually always deleted after they hav...Messages are usually always deleted after they have been delivered and acknowledged. However - if you are using KahaDB you can enable archiving which will store deleted messages in a separate directory.<br /><br />cheers,<br /><br />RobRob Davieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08525735841110843594noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-57906231205646358072010-10-14T03:26:55.195-07:002010-10-14T03:26:55.195-07:00IS VERY GOOD..............................IS VERY GOOD<a href="http://x91.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x92.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x93.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x94.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x95.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x96.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x97.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x98.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x99.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x100.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x101.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x102.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x103.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x104.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x105.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x106.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x107.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x108.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x109.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x110.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x111.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x112.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x113.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x114.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x115.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x116.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x117.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x118.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x119.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://x120.003c.info/" rel="nofollow">.</a>opuj74dhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04589443202128864251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16885284.post-43897680195197649172010-09-15T05:15:25.195-07:002010-09-15T05:15:25.195-07:00I use it from a PHP script over STOMP and it works...I use it from a PHP script over STOMP and it works just fine for my integration with Cacti.<br /><br />But i don&#39;t know the unit use on the returned values like storeUsage or averageEnqueueTime for example.<br /><br />Any ideas about the units used?P!cOhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11995655512875233900noreply@blogger.com