let's catch this terrorist

According to that aforementioned source(Political Handbook of the world)
Iraq is Sunni(ultra -Orthodox), which is against the combo of Shi'ite and Khurdish, none of that is allied with Hussein's government. The shi'ite
and khurds split in 1994 into two groups PUK and DPK. With Hussein's removal an interim government combines Allawi a shi'ite with Yawar a Sunni. In
2006 Sunni rebels are attacking everyone and now want to negotiate surrender. More like Sunni-eak attack. With "friendly murder" the new tactic,
let's just reinstate LT. William Cally, herd everybody arab into a ditch, throw in Bush, and drop the bomb on it. Perhaps the ashes and smoke will
rise in peace.

It’s quite obvious to see that you are new to these boards, with the layout of your posts.
There a real strain on the eyes to read, a little more punctuation and spacing would make a lot of difference.

I’m not the grammar police just giving a friendly tip, as more people will actually read and take in what you are posting.

Tone23 is asking very basic and logical questions into your claims, just answer him as best as you can, with as much detail and reasoning as possible,
it just adds credibility to your claims.
Ignoring or evading his questions just discredits yourself and your claims.

I enjoy reading tone23's posts and opinions, you would do well in answering him.

You say you have proof….then lets see it (or at least a very good reason why not)

Again the co-ordinance of 67 degrees e longitude, 35 degrees n latitude were put on the F.B.I. tip line. We believe this area was searched and we hope
that american forces in admitting to those places that were to dangerous to enter compile these places and form some plan to enter them. That's what
was suggested along with that information. U.B.L. is a good human source to what I claim. There are others, you think I've waited too long for
response or action?

To crizz this is gone three pages of them asking. If i had that info in my hand i wouldn't be doing this. They don't understand that stripping the
protection off of themselves by removing the government is got to be equalled by replacing that security. None of us own's an army. If that
information is true half of the congress will walk out. Must I remind you that any shake up of the U.S. government has led to some attack somewhere by
an enemy.

The mountainous boarder region between pakistan/china/india is where bin laden is located? thats nice but can we get back to the point of the original
post.

You say you have these tapes, in a safe in new jersey..

Please elaborate on the initial claim.

What is the 'genuine proof that bush planned the nine eleven attacks' on these tapes.

What is the authentisity/creditability of these tapes, the 'They sound macho but my sources say he's al-quaeda' bit, is not very inspiring.

You have to understand we get many people here on ATS claiming allsorts, and alot of deliberate disinformation.. you will find very few people here
will take this seriously if you have nothing to backup your claims.

One thing i do happen to notice is a mention of the removal of the US government under the realization of concrete proof of inside job on 9-11..
And the resulting "attacks" by enemys... and disorder of the countries security.
(a warning, to not act on coming new information, for the good of the people?)

of that, i disagree... If our government was cast down, and had temporary confusion until new elections, the supreme court could keep things legal
long enough to get order and law back together... (if nothing else)

I see that as a potential outcome... (if 9-11 conspiracies are true) and am willing to deal with a country without a president, until one that truly
represents the people can be properly elected... (the normal chain of command, would also be taken down from the same connections most likely).

And as far as being attacked, when and if the US people actually support a full investigation and presentation of damning evidence...
Why?
isn't the removal of a certain meddling overpowerful president one of the main reasons that islamic extremists are fighting us? (dont they hate him,
worse than americans in general?)

Wouldn't they give a new leadership a chance to form, and see what the new foreign policy would be?

If they attacked, they could be sure of a warmonger elect... if they held off, then they would be smarter by far... (this is assuming that they
didn't attack american civilian targets on 9-11)
and no matter what you think, ignorance, isn't equated to "dumb"

I dunno... the critic has stated many common disinfo points (i.e: afghan origin of terrorists- instead of Saudi) so i dont know what to beleive... but
I do know that i dont agree with the surmmation...

and as far as code words... I sure hope so, or i wasted my time even commenting...

Originally posted by crittz
You say you have these tapes, in a safe in new jersey..

Please elaborate on the initial claim.

What is the 'genuine proof that bush planned the nine eleven attacks' on these tapes.

What is the authentisity/creditability of these tapes, the 'They sound macho but my sources say he's al-quaeda' bit, is not very inspiring.

I don't want this blog 12 pages long of people asking the same question. It's simple to understand a conversation between bush and bin laden. When
it only consist of "go ahead." Basically that's what an alien source told me. I've never heard it but until I do my interpretation is that it was
in the conrtext of "go ahead and the consequences will be harsh." The source says no he's a conspirator. I am attempting to get either side to
admit to any conversation.

Originally posted by TONE23
The Critic.
Are you exploring the proper channels; as to who to turn this type of evidence in?
If so, is it going well?
If not, What the heck are you waiting for?

[edit on 30-6-2006 by TONE23]

No one is ever gonna here them until long term, just like every thing else.If i do i will definately remember you people. I gonna throw, excuse me ,
the bomb in the woman's office and see if she'll give it up. Yeah, if she knows what's good for her the senate investigating committee chairman is
where they landed. F.B.I. ain't my friends no more so now I gotta pull on the old womans hair. She's gonna talk soon.

Originally posted by The Critic
It's simple to understand a conversation between bush and bin laden. When it only consist of "go ahead." Basically that's what an alien source
told me. I've never heard it but until I do my interpretation is that it was in the conrtext of "go ahead and the consequences will be harsh." The
source says no he's a conspirator. I am attempting to get either side to admit to any conversation.

okie dokey...
So an alien told you all this info? uh... i let that one be for now...

So your source (this alien) does he have a name? I would think you could at least give that to us? no?

And as to the phone conversation between bush and bin laden... are you sure Bush made the phone call himself? he didn't have cheney do it? or
Rumsfeld?

and dont you worry about my life. (i would assume that you weren't making a threat on my life personally) I always watch my back, and if I went
missing, some nice little info packets would make their way to several trustworthy police sources... so rest your mind on that critic.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.