According to the indictment, the assault began at approximately 00.10 at Vesterbro in Copenhagen on Christmas night, as Mads Schøllhammer received a major blow to the head with a glass bottle that shattered.

Then he received several blows to the head with a chain lock and wire lock, and the accused gave him “countless” punches and kicks to the head and body. Mads Schøllhammer fell down, but the defendants continued to beat him in the head and body with fists and the chain lock, and they kicked him in the body and head.

Then the four youths pushed Nanna Skovmand to the ground and beat her “several” times in the head with the chain lock.

Comments

@ Alice
I have to THANK YOU for the advice on rebuking anger. I have the same issue when things like this come up and I have never thought of using that power to get it “off my back”.
When we are angry to this level we don’t see or act clearly.

A random victim is fine in order to fulfil the command in the Koran (part of Islamic law) “Let them find in you harshness” (9:123). Two other random victims who were horribly killed by muslims in the UK are Ross Parker and Kriss Donald:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Ross_Parkerhttp://libertygb.org.uk/v1/index.php/news-libertygb/6653-i-fought-back

A similar hate crime occurred in Seattle in 2011 (though the victim, thankfully, survived):

KIRO Radio, January 21, 2011 – 5:54 pm

The attack was savage. Two people set upon Shane McClellan [age 16] in the early morning hours one day last May as the 16-year-old was walking home from a friend’s house.

“They burned him with lit cigarettes, they urinated on him, they beat him, his teeth were chipped, his face was swollen almost beyond recognition when the police arrived several hours later,” deputy prosecutor Erin Becker told a judge Friday.

Police say the men beat and tortured McClellan for as long as four hours, at one point saying “how do you like it, white boy?”

One of the perps, who was sentenced for a hate crime, apparently, was a Somali immigrant named Ahmed Mohamed.

Although mainstream media depict the crime in terms such as:

“…a teenager savagely beaten and burned for hours because the color of his skin….”

— of course no one in the mainstream considered whether it was a religious hate crime, Muslim-on-Kafir.

Thanks for reminding us of this horrific case, Voeg. I think this had more to do with Islam than with racial hatred, myself.

As I noted earlier on this thread, I think putting this hatred in racial terms often follows the hatred of Infidels, rather than causing it.

Hatred of the local Infidels can take the form of a disdain for any of their specific characteristics, and this can involve race, language, and any physical or cultural traits, but hatred of such traits is not the motivating cause.

you can always keep on educating this people but if this people are not going to learn and pounder in their mind and heart we can not do anything But the people who commited the crime . what they do is terrible the only thing we can do to both is one avoiding getting involved with the kind of people 2 those who commit crime should be punish as the way they did to the victim

This is not a race war, Georg, even though the perpetrators and victims here were of different races here. Muslims come in all races, and Western “reverts” are just as vicious as Muslims born into this foul creed.

And you find victims of Islam all over the world: Asians in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and China; south Asians in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh; Arab Christians in Iraq, Syria, and the Islamic State; black Africans in Nigeria, Sudan, and Kenya, and caucasians in Europe.

”But I think Muslims tend to exude an antipathy for whites that can’t simply be chalked up to differences in faith.”

Really ? *I* have never seen any examples of muslims who exude ”an antipathy for whites”. Perhaps you could post a link that gives some evidence for this ?

I have certainly seen **plenty** of evidence that shows muslims have an ‘antipathy’ (euphemism !) for non-muslims. As gravenimage notes, islam cares nothing for race, except when it suits their agenda. Wicked white colonialists, etc. etc.

When Muslims include the race card in their rhetoric, it’s largely for propaganda purposes, exploiting the West’s own White Guilt. Islamic culture does cultivate a variety of racisms — not just against whites, but also against various Asians and against black Africans. Islam all told is a vast, diversely incoherent tapestry of hateful racisms — all incorporated in an overarching Super-Racism of the Master Race, Muslims, against all non-Muslims.

“*I* have never seen any examples of muslims who exude ”an antipathy for whites”. Perhaps you could post a link that gives some evidence for this ?”

Re: my comment up above about the Seattle hate crime in 2011, where two Somali Muslim immigrants tortured a white boy:

“Police say the men beat and tortured McClellan for as long as four hours, at one point saying “how do you like it, white boy?”

Also, let us not forget the hate crime in Glasgow in 2004, where a group of Pakistani Muslims tortured another white boy, Kriss Donald (this time to death):

In March, Kriss Donald was snatched from the street in Glasgow by a gang, simply because he was white. He was bundled into a car [a silver Mercedes, btw] and driven more than 200 miles to Dundee and back to Glasgow before being stabbed 13 times and set on fire while he was still alive.

I don’t see why certain Muslims who engage in violence in the West can’t combine racist anti-white memes along with their jihad (the West’s PC MC helps enormously by circulating and sustaining said meme). It certainly seems like some have done exactly that. When the Muslims are indulging in the meme, it doesn’t mean they sincerely, ardently believe in its veracity; they are simply using it as part of their jihadist rhetoric, whereby “West”, “white”, “Christian”, “Kafir”, etc., all mingle & meld, mix & match…

Re the race issue, and everyone who has commented—Muslim hatred *can* have a racial facet at times.

The texts and tenets of Islam are full of Arab supremacism, and the “Prophet” himself referred to blacks as “raisin heads”. For centuries, Muslims targeted black Africans more than any other group for enslavement.

And in the present day, there are certainly Muslims who rant about hating whites—particularly Black Muslims, where hatred of whites is an intrinsic part of their faith—but also among Pakistani, Arab, and African Muslims in Europe, which could well be the case here.

But in all of these cases, the racial hatred seems to follow in the wake of hatred of unbelievers—in Sudan, most of the Kuffar are black, in Indonesia, many of the non-Muslims are Chinese, in Denmark, most of the Infidels are caucasian. And so, the racial hatred follows from hatred of the non-believers.

Thank you for displaying some of the facts. And I didn’t mean to suggest that Muslim racist tendencies are limited to anti-white antipathy. I’ve personally known Arabs who made disgusting remarks essentially saying African-American Muslims are not real Muslims, and I couldn’t help but notice a tone and disposition which was decidedly racist when they “discussed”, jeered would probably be a more apt term, it. Even Anwar Sadat of Egypt was subject to disturbing murmurings having to do with his skin color.

It is simply another aspect and natural consequence of the retrograde conception of [un]reality that is Islam.

They connect “whites” with “roadblock”. Whites are the dominant power in the world. It’s the civilized social systems of the western world that prevent them (make that…. should prevent them) from rampaging all over the world and doing what they love to do…rape, maim, kill, force conversions, confiscate property, destroy, destroy, destroy.

Gravenimage , and others with similar feedback… don’t forget the Armenian Genocide of 100 yrs ago when a couple million, i believe it was reported, were killed , deported, tortured as possibly the first of such brutality and evidence of Islamic furor and hatefulness…. on matter what they may say their Koran tells them to do/ be..
I heard enough about it from my parents who were survivors of that historc event which most people know little , if anything about. ~~~Peace

When a pack of hyenas find an easy prey, they do not consider what color the prey may be. The Islamic young are trained to use every vicious means to subdue their prey. They are taught to try to distinguish between their prey and prefer the kaffir. If convenient, they will enslave female Kaffir for sex. They have different grades of kaffir such as Jew, Christian, apostate, etc. If Kaffir are not available, they will seek to prey on Shia or Sunnis Muslims as the case may be. If they cannot find Shia or Sunni Muslims, they will prey on each other.

In days long gone by 1000 years ago where there was no way to compare living then to modern society of now, there were the same Muslims engaging in the same activities with kaffir, Shia or Sunni. The Kaffir were primarily Jews and Christians. In those days the Muslims would kidnap young christian boys whom they castrated for eunuchs and very young girls as concubines or sex slaves. Muslims still do this today in Africa. Christian families constantly lived in fear of losing their children to the Muslim hyenas. This is why Crusader armies were formed and then further used to protect Christian pilgrimage routes to the Holy Land.

To simply say this is about race, is not believable and borders on being ridiculous. Ask all of today’s Muslim victims in Africa that question.

It’s an ideological war. I know people say you can’t win an ideological war by force,but what if the other side refuses to change, and keeps coming and coming like the Terminator? What if a large percentage of muslims either the jihadist variety, or the jihadist supporters (who could become violent at the flick of a switch) and the legions of others who like the whole sharia thing like acting like 7th century savages? What if they aren’t motivated nor care about blue jeans and apple pie?

OK, I see what you are asking and I see that Drakken wants to “fight back” (AGAINST something but not FOR what). But about this ideological war; What if we see a 3-way-partition? Instead of a 2-way-partition-situation? Whatever their mentality, the 1st group, Muslims, or a big part of them, are moving on, dangerous. OK.

And then? is there somehow a UNITED DEMOCRATIC GROUP that feels threathened by them? No, there is a truly Democray-loyal group and a majority who just does not care or feels compelled to defend the Muslims and to remain neutral.

So there are 3 groups; Totalitarian Muslims, True Democracy-loyalists and for now “neutrals”.

I know JW people want to save “the West” and lose not one little part of it. But this means that these true Democracy-loyalists keep trying to save the very neutrals that spurn their help, their opinion, their pleas, keep trying to “drag dead horses”.

What if Democracy-loyalists at least themselves know what they are for and unite for that and defend that, but NOT the neutrals! no matter that that makes them a minority.

And so, so what if somewhere in Europe Muslims gain power?! If neutrals get punished for their ignorance, arrogance, stubbornness? It will wake up a lot of them and make many truly want to join the democracy-loyalists.

From the ideogical perspective I think Democracy-loyalists should not just know what they are against, what they want to stop and fight, they should even more know exactly, painstakingly, what it is they are FOR.

Democracy-loyalists should also have Most IMportant Guidelines like the Muslims have, only Dem-loy’s should choose the constitution of some other really uniting meaningful texts to follow and die for.

And if the Dem-loy’s know full well what they are FOR, then let the Muslims and neutrals be the ones defending themselves from that, instead of always the Dem-loy’s defending AGAINST the Muslims and not being helped by the neutrals.

It is my vision that once the dem-loy’s optimally know what they are FOR they can take in apostates of Islam and “neutrals” because only then they can present a better positive alternative to Islam.

Now? Counterjihadists for 95 % only tell the Muslims to GIVE UP something they love, their belief AND their loved ones, but Muslims should be enticed by something to really replace Islam with, and also to replace their beloved networks with, namely new dem-loy-networks.

Demsci, what you refer to as “Dem Loyalists” have rescued neutrals from savagery before—most notably from the scourge of Fascism.

There have always in any conflict been a large number of people who do not want to fall to barbarism, and who want to be saved, but who will do little or nothing for themselves.

I still want to save these people whenever possible, because *no one* should have to suffer at the hands of savages—but we cannot necessarily count on any actual backing from such people, even in the moral sense.

This phenomenon can also be seen in the simile of the passive sheep, the protecting sheepdog, and the ravening wolves.

Of course they did—what could be more Islamic than savaging the Kuffar? And it’s not as though they have the slightest respect for non-Shari’ah courts. In the West, even the most vicious thugs are usually quiet and at least nominally respectful. Not pious Muslims, though.

And it was likely no accident that this savage attack occurred Christmas night—a time when Infidels in Denmark, Christian or secular, are feeling joyous.

I don’t need to tell you Danes what to do. You are Vikings, right? People who attack innocent people in the US are often surprised when their intended victim shoots them. Short of that, there are electric stun guns and pepper spray.

The perps’ behavior in court should be met with brute force to put them in their place, by a big bailiff (preferably a Berserker). And they should be found in contempt, with time to serve immediately, no bail set. They need to be humiliated, and their relatives if any be made to pay damages physical and mental to that wounded woman. In effect, hold their punk ass loser butts hostage until some money is forthcoming. Once they’re in the system, it should grip them like a lion’s teeth in the neck of a gazelle, so that they become the envy of none of their friends.
That is lenient. Their own law is much more savage and arbitrary, hence their laughter.
If they assaulted a random Muslim couple and did that to the man and woman, the man could demand their deaths – and get it, depending on his status.

No. Whatever the sentence was going to be, triple it. That would be an extra term each for (a) contempt of court because of their misbehaviour and, by the same token (b) further insulting their victims. Then strip them of their Danish citizenship and send them back to their country of ethnic origin.

The perpetrators laugh and high-five in court because they know punishment, if you can call it that, in the West is a joke. You should see how ISIS fighters cry like babies and shake with fear when they are caught by non-hobbled Iraqi soldiers.

Psychopaths can see no consequences for their actions other than what they want to happen. These muslims see nothing happening to them as they think they are *superior* to their victims and the Court. Hence, the laughter. If there are harsh punishments, they may not be free again to hurt others, but it will not deter other psychopaths. Prisons are full of them.
Only when the wild beast of islam is no more will mankind be relieved of this scourge from satan. For now, he is inspiring them to greater acts of bloodshed and torture.
(Revelation 13;17;19)

And I didn’t say or indicate that I thought there would be. I just said *if* and that it would not deter them from future acts when released, nor would it deter people like them from acting in the same barbaric way.
Since I am not in that country, I have only the information I find in the news or online to indicate at what stage the courts are in responding to the thuggery from muslims.

The Danish solution to this Muslim attack on its citizens will probably be to import another couple of million ” poor Muslim refugees”. By importing more “moderate” “peaceful” and “tolerant” Muslims into the country, they will have a calming effect on the ” few” Muslims that have misunderstood their ” religion of peace”

The brutal and vicious act of abuse , malice -filled and hateful violence against this woman by those Muslim thugs only reflects the strong spirit of misogyny that is so much part of the essence of Islam. As explained by Brigitte Gabriel on page 172 in her book which is entitled THEY MUST BE STOPPED. Which reads “Woman in Islam are considered unclean, deemed inferior even to dirt.”

The heinous action of extreme violence towards this women by those Muslims fiends is not an isolated case. For many other times and in other places and countries of Europe such terrible and awful violence against females occur because of so much Muslim entering into Europe. As for the anti-female behavior of so many Muslim males, those hideous misogynist will continue this ranging for acid attacks, car attacks gang rapes that have happened in Europe because of the spread Islam.. This malicious spirit of misogyny by Muslim males is to even towards Muslim girls and women. As in the sad and tragic cases of F.G.M. and the malicious -filled, vicious, brutal and heartless action of “honor killing.” As Brigitte Gabriel wrote in her book THEY MUST BE STOPPED. Which on page 176 reads “Honor killings have also come to the West thanks to the rise of Islamic immigration.”
Indeed, they must be stopped !

Yes, we must stop Muslim immigration. I certainly agree.
And we must write to our US Representatives & Senators. And to the local media. And to the colleges & universities. And to the churches. It’s exhausting & time-consuming, I agree. I know, because I’ve been doing that for a while now.
But, I certainly agree with another commenter that we need to read Brigitte Gabriel’s book, “They Must Be Stopped,” & put her recommended plan into action. Because if the Islamist Jihad is going to be stopped, those of us on JihadWatch & those of us rooting for Pamela Geller, are in the vanguard of those who will do the stopping!
I find if I write one letter, say to my Representative, I simply need only do some minor editing to send it out to others.
Joining Gabriel’s Act! for America is helpful, too.
What do others suggest?

Walk yourself through that scenario. You shoot a muslim in self-defense. The case goes to court. Muslim whines and cries victimization. Gutless judge caves. You sentenced to jail time.

The only thing that will turn the ship around is a SOCIAL UPRISING. Politicians are hypersensitive to getting votes. The retired pensioner demographic are the best ones to start it because they 1. don’t have to worry about losing their job due to political incorrectness, 2. they have the time to organize and petition, demonstrate, lobby 3. they control the vote because they represent the largest demographic 4. they are the parents of another large demographic and have influence on them

Yes, good thinking Alyssa, senior citizens can do a lot of good in that way! and you give 4 excellent reasons for your idea too.

You know, there now is man (Zekeriah Emanuel, aged 57) who wrote an article “Why I hope to die at 75”! In the Atlantic. His point; after about 75, on average (there are always positive exceptions of course) people deteriorate ever more and while he (and I) is strongly against euthanasia he says he will demand no more cure treatment after 75, only ask for palliative care.

Why do I say this? Because senior citizens can play the endgame of their life very well, by fighting AGAINST totalitarians, including Muslims. And FOR the full democratic system, and human rights.

Hell, if physically capable it would be preferable to let seniors offer their lives (already lived, with little remaining) if young people can be spared (they and we risk them being killed young or being lifelong handicapped or traumatized). So hear me well; ONLY if casualties in fight must fall, let it be old ones rather than young ones, as much as possible, that is all I say.

Yes, senior citizens could make a vast difference, and THEY are the fasting growing segment of the population!

When I think of whipping a beautiful Danish woman in the face with chains, I think of Moslems. Way to go guys. One imagines that you topped the day off by snipping off a clitoris or two. Hopefully you weren’t able to do that deed with the woman in the photo, so she may be able to continue with her life in a normal and good (i.e., non-Moslem) manner.

A great many Muslims – not all of them, of course, but certainly enough to
be a big problem – have no respect for us whatsoever. What on earth do
people expect when this vicious ideology comes against a weak-willed
apologetic, watered down and emasculated culture? This is what happens
after decades of Leftist bullshit being rammed down everyone’s throats –
i.e. Western Christian males are Satan incarnate and literally anything
else is automatically superior. Well, we now have a very bold and
confident ideology just walking around with impunity and literally laughing
in our faces. This is what you phoney ‘progressive’ feminists and
Cultural Marxists have wanted for years. Be careful what you wish for.
If this ideology takes over completely, at least you lot are going down too.
You’re as sick as the monsters who did this to this poor woman.

“A great many Muslims – not all of them, of course, but certainly enough to
be a big problem – have no respect for us whatsoever.”

No, not “of course”. There’s no evidence, other than superficial evidence (“I know a nice Muslim who smiles at me and is friendly”), that any Muslims respect us; while there loom mountains of data amid oceans of dots-to-be-connected indicating the opposite. That is, if one has been paying attention these past 15 fucking years.

For fuck sake, do you always have to be so facetious? What about
those that leave Islam (an estimated 15-20,000 in the UK alone
each year)? What about a great many who are still in the ‘closet’
about their apostasy, but just keep up the pretense of being Muslim?
Many great people who now speak out against Islam were once Muslim.

Paul’s slapdash taxonomy of the various flavors of harmless, hopeful Muslims out there may well be accurate. Unfortunately, given the problem of taqiyya, we cannot be sufficiently certain on a macro scale who or where they are — the only scale that matters, given the vast, diverse, complex, worldwide dangers which the Muslims who do pose a threat present.

And, before you accuse me, I am certainly not defending the
ideology of Islam, just identifying the fact that certain people
who have been born into it have had the goodness and the
courage to leave. We should be thankful for that and empowering
these people and giving them a platform. However, that’s rarely
the case as the Leftist establishment often overrides them
as they like to dictate what we should all think. They are equally
culpable for the mess we’re in. That’s my point.

Paul, I don’t defend the ideology of Islam, either. It is clearly a cult of death & domination of kaffirs, and a cult of degradation of self & others, even within the umma.
The question we are all faced with is: Must this confrontation between Muslims and the rest of the world to be decided only militarily, or possibly otherwise with guns wielded by individuals?
Or: Are we of the West to understand that a majority of Muslims are actually being held as “hostages,” who are variously unwillingly held captive by the fundamentalist 2% or 5% of Muslims who would certainly kill them if they tried to leave Islam?
My question boils down to this: If mass slaughter of 1.6 billion Muslims is not to be the answer, then is there a way to release these hostages, and safely convert them to a free speech, free expression, rational, democratic way of socio-poliltical conduct? That is, is there a peaceful way to settle this problem?
I’d like to hear others’ views on this question.

IF these animals are sentenced to prison time, are there any Danes (in prison, or guards) to do a Jeff Dahlmer? (Hope I spelled it correctly).

(He was, in the late 1980’s through early 1990’s, in Wisc., kidnapping you children, mostly boys, killing them, THEN MAKING THEM INTO SOUP AND STEWS).

he was found guilty, sentenced to life imprisonment, and ALONE, TAKING A SHOWER ( this is how I recall the news stories) the guard had to go to the bathroom, and Dahlmer “slipped on a bar of soap, hit his head on the wall, and cracked his skull–and bled to death.

There was, as I recall ( this was just over 20+ years ago)) no inquiry.

Between fifty to a hundred years from now (provided the human race as it exists is still on this rock) Islam will be considered a historical atrocity and hopefully banned forever. Its members simply are not human.

“*I* have never seen any examples of muslims who exude ”an antipathy for whites”. Perhaps you could post a link that gives some evidence for this ?”

Re: my comment up above about the Seattle hate crime in 2011, where two Somali Muslim immigrants tortured a white boy:

“Police say the men beat and tortured McClellan for as long as four hours, at one point saying “how do you like it, white boy?”
————————————————–
The point is, would they have still tortured him if he was a white Muslim?
If he had converted to Islam, no matter how white he was he would not be attacked so race is not the problem, religion is.

As I intimated (but didn’t spell out), Islam has a Hierarchy of Hate — so no doubt they would not have attacked the white boy if they thought he was Muslim: i.e., had he been Muslim, his Islam would have trumped his race.

I don’t fancy the doctrine of “turn the other cheek”. Sociopaths like the “immigrants” described would benefit from a taste of their own medicine followed by summary deportation back to whatever third world cess pit they crawled out of.
It seems unlikely that the “State” (any western state) has a firm commitment to protect citizens like the two victims in this case. Nature abhors a vacuum, and it will be up to a coalition of the willing to do the necessary.
I’d start by encouraging any interested Muslim “fighter” to enlist in the service of the Caliphate with the understanding that they will never be allowed to return to the west.

//”Nature abhors a vacuum”//
Thanks, that is logic I was looking for! Drakken is quite mistaken when he says; “no more Islam-no more problems”. As THAT will only create a vacuum, into which perhaps the Scientologists or the Mafia will jump. And then we have to say; “no more scientologists-no more problems” etc.

No, maybe it sounds vague, but true Democracy-loyalists have got to find a positive alternative to Islam, so strong it can actually win over many Muslims to their side, to their beliefs, to their networks.

And it need NOT be the one or the other strategy, there can be a combined one.

And it need not succeed all over the world, not even all over Europe. All democracy-loyalists need is a few strong havens, where they are in the majority. Our culture is the better one and if it competes with Muslims it beats them most of the time.

But Muslims beat us in knowing what they are FOR and ready to die for and unite behind. I am sure we here all agree that it is not wise to underestimate our mortal enemy, and yes, those Most Important texts of them and them knowing what they are FOR much more than we do, that are their strong points!

I think the Danes should be more tolerant. To paraphrase a disgraceful Brit judge about a rape victim: when it’s going to happen anyway, lie back and enjoy it.

A single generation of Western leaders have triggered the downfall of the most advanced civilisation in world history – which was too weak and naive to address the most backward. But before you start pointing fingers, consider it was we that elected them.

Same thing happens here in Australia, second generation Lebanese Muslims born in Australia causing all the trouble. They go around in gangs doing things like this, then their leaders whinge about how Australia doesn’t give them a fair go, how they are discriminated against, etc etc. Actions have consequences, that’s why Australians can’t stand Lebanese Muslims. Only cowards go around in gangs causing trouble as well.

The Scandinavian Countries are simply reaping the rewards of having a moslim population. They should thank their Governments for such a wonderful immigration policy. Keep the blighters over there as we have enough of them here in Canada…..truly, they screw up every Country they infest.

Dont blame them..blame the people who set the wolves loose amongst the sheep. Blame the people who let this go unchallenged. Its all within our control, not outside our control. Much can be achieved by peaceful means alone via the ballot box.

If you know that a fierce dog is on the loose, dont tlet it into your home. Or if you do and it savages your children dont blame the dog

According to you then, the criminal Muslims should receive no punishment, but the people who set immigration policy are held liable?

Dogs act only in response to their raising and do not possess rational thought processes. No matter who lets these animals (Muslims) in, or how they entered the country, THEY are 100% responsible for any crimes they commit. Perhaps you don’t believe what you clearly wrote or just used a very bad analogy. Otherwise, you are a fool.

You’re still ahead of the game. Down here in the States We the Stupid elected one, of a less than savory nature, not once but twice. How these dipsticks could do this is utterly beyond my ken. At least my conscience does not bother me. Still, I face the same consequences as the guilty. ‘Infest’ is the best word
I have seen to describe the Muslim presence. We also have some Christian Arabic people, and they keep under deep cover, unless you know them. They are fine people, and they suffer the worst of all, for the sins of others.
Like real germs, the infestation is exponential, but the cure must be one by one. Some years ago the Iranian students protested in Boston. Bostonians put them to flight. One of the pursued was a friend of mine. He is Armenian.

Alan……….At present, Canada is enjoying a reasonable sort of Government. I truly feel sorry for the Americans that didn’t support obama…particularly for his final term. In my opinion, he has been the worst President in the history of the Republic. The only thing that I can think of that got him re elected was the race card and the partisans that would only vote Democrat, neither of which is a valid reason for his support. A poorly informed population is the bane of Democracy.

Martin – thanks for the consolation. We call them ‘uninformed voters.’ They call us ‘birthers’ and and ‘deny-ers’ and ‘neo- cons.’ Marshall McLuhan was right in his day; he is 10 times more spot on now.
Some people passively absorb the words of the liberal press, and conveniently ‘seek no further.’
I believe that chroniclers of history in a saner time will record this President as the biggest traitor in the lifetime of any nation. He makes Benedict Arnold look like Thomas Paine. As far as being hoodwinked by a demagogue, ‘We the Stupid’ elected a President who hates the country, hates the people, hates the flag – won’t even wear it on his lapel. He made passports necessary for travel to Canada, and blew open the border with Mexico to allow wholesale entry of illegal aliens – with muslim terrorists in their midst.
Moreover he returned a bust of Winston Churchill to the UK, and gave the Queen some electrical trinket on his visit there. A total embarrassment – at least some Canadians get the picture.

Yes Obama is not a great president but let’s not make things up. Americans have needed passports to reenter the country from Canada since the beginning of 2008 and guess who the president was at that time. Here’s a news flash, it the Canadians who make the rules about what’s needed to enter their country not the Americans. Only the country being entered makes rules about what’s need to enter. Can you imagine if, say, China made the rules about what’s needed to enter the U.S.?
Obama does wear the American flag pin on his lapel. He was born in Hawaii and he is not a Muslim unless he would be the first Muslim who only attended church, never attended a mosque, drinks alcohol and eats pork.

Art – right on one score – the immigration. Americans can enter Canada but need a passport to re-enter the US. So unless one is emigrating, what is the difference? As for the pin, he might be wearing it now, but he kicked about it. Contrast also his reverent quoting of “The holy Qoran” , with his remark early on that Americans are fearful little people “clinging to their guns and Bibles.” No christian refers to his brethren with such scorn. Note also his statement that the Muslim call to prayer is the most beautiful sound he ever heard. As Charles Krauthammer writes, one must pay attention not to what this man says, but to what he does. They are diametrically opposed.
He claimed at the outset that he did not even know Rev. White personally although he had attended that church for over 2 decades, and he disavowed any knowledge of the Reverend’s “God Damn America” sermon, when as it turns out nothing could be further from the truth; one lie after another from this man. God forfend that Canada should ever be stuck with a leader like him. It’s been a long 6 years and more down here. But the worm is turning. It took 2 bombs, 100 casualties and 3 deaths to wake up Boston.

I travel to Montreal a lot, and despite the insanity of the PQ and their ilk, Quebec is one of the few places in the West where they stand up and aggressively defend their culture.
…………………………..

This is true, Brook—unfortunately, they are primarily defending it against Anglophone Canadians. Quebec has actually imported a lot of Muslims in order to boost their demographics, which needless to say is *far* more suicidal than encroachment by peaceful English-speaking Canadians or Americans.

Brook, here’s a disturbing article about Muslim immigration into Quebec:

“How Quebec chooses immigrants”

“The current hysteria over Muslim immigration in Quebec – a major aspect of the secular charter debate – is partly due to the province’s own immigration policies.

“Ever since Quebec gained the right to select its own immigrants, it made sure to grant privileged access to candidates already fluent in French. This made, of course, perfect sense. What happened, though, is that most French-speaking immigrants came from France’s former zone of influence, namely Arab and Muslim countries…”

You both seem like fools, spewing your half-truths. Many of those who voted AGAINST President Obama are now benefitting from some of the policies the he and his administration have implemented!
…………………………………

His statement would hold true for virtually any voter, and virtually any elected official, no matter how heinous. Many Germans opposed to Hitler benefitted—at least in the very short run—from his championing of the Volkswagen and his building the autobahn. It would be difficult to make an argument for much else, though, like the destruction of German democracy, WWII, and the Holocaust.

What “Galen Muhammad” may be referring to is Obamacare—supporters often say that Obama has “given” the American people universal health care, and seem unaware that it is Americans who are actually paying for this system—it is not done by magical fiat or out of his own personal wealth.

Of course, even if one is a supporter of Obamacare, this president’s constant weakening of America, alienation of our allies, and enabling of our Muslim enemies only benefits “Galen Muhammad” and his supremacist coreligionists.

But he asks—have we benefitted from *any* of Obama’s policies? Probably so. While it stand in stark opposition to most of his other Islamophilic policies, he—or the military under his administration, in any case—has been quite enthusiastic about droning Jihad terrorists, and it would be difficult to criticize such a program. Unless, of course, one is a pious supporter of Jihad as is “Galen Muhammad”.

He who thinks he sees a fool – might be looking through a fool’s eyes.

I have not benefitted from one thing 0bama has done, and a friend of mine who is all aglow about some hand surgery he got, he would have gotten anyway because he is poor as a doormouse.
In fact, a lot of people who got free medical attention will now be paying.
If they underestimated their income from all sources, (even for Medicaid) the government will dun them for the value of their formerly free coverage. So people will suddenly find them owing the government up to 1000$-US/ mo. But they’re poor, you say…no problem, the government can remove it from their SSI or SS, just the way Medicare Part B is taken from one’s SS. and of course they can always sock it to your IRS refund, if you filed, even as one of the working poor. The government is already doing that to some 6 million people who did not get the coverage or got fouled up and did not have the coverage for that year.
It gets better. the government admits that they have improperly calculated the value of some programs, so that even if you estimate your income correctly, if they assigned you a more expensive plan, you are in the same kettle of fish.
I haven’t even begun on the taxes levied to support this system, a tax on the sale of all medical supplies, a tax on sales of homes – those two come to mind right away.
And of course, the complete House and Senate exempt themselves completely from the ACA using a simple clause in the act itself which exempts companies with 50 employees or less. So there are 100 Senators and 435 Representatives in Congress. How the hell does that equal 50?
I could make a fair comparison of this Act to Soylent Green, and some of you might say that is way over the top, but wait ’til it’s ‘your turn in the barrel.’

Some of the reasons that Obama got re-erected ( no spelling- the American people got screwed- and royally, without being kissed)>:

1. the dead voted for him. At least since JFK bet president Nixon in 196o, the dead (especially in Illinois) have consistently voted Dem.

Also, consider, in the last erection-in ONE POLLING PLACE NOT 1 VOTE FOR ROMNEY? SOUNDS HARD TO BELIEVE.

In one district in Florida, ( and a FEDERAL JUDGE REFUSED TO ALLOW A RECOUNT) the Dem. nominee GOT MORE VOTES THEN REGISTERED VOTERS.

Then, there was/is the IRS holding back the tax exemption and other matters for CONSERVATIVE AND NON LIBERAL GROUPS.

And Ron Paul supporters not voting ( and some other ” conservatives” not voting because Romney was too liberal-not close enough to some of their views).

And, the race and victimization cards.

AND WHO CAN FORGET THAT PICTURE ID IS DISCRIMINATORY? (I went to EXCHANGE a defective item at Home Depot, WITH A RECEIPT THAT I PAID CASH–A $10.00 ITEM- AND EXCHANGE NOT GET A REFUND- AND NEEDED PICTURE ID. BUT TO VOTE, NOT NECESSARY. To say otherwise is racist.

Right on all counts, Oliver – good to hear from someone who recalls the shenanigans that JFK pulled in Chicago. I too am aware of that district (in MI?) in which not one vote was cast for Romney. That’s really overdoing it, a statistical impossibility, but that is what total arrogance does.
Most of the dead vote Democatic because everything is free in heaven. Also in RI parking lots and telephone poles vote with exceeding loyalty. If I listed the crap that went down in RI elections, it would fill a book. Our recent Governor Chafee is bosom buddies with 0bama, and now he is jousting against Hillary Clinton, that rare combination of Lady Macbeth and Lucretia Borgia. He’d better watch out or he’ll be ‘Fosterized.’ And of all things, he’s dredging up Whitewater. We here in RI do not bemoan the missing Linc.
And our esteemed Senator Sheldon Whitehouse had suggested in emails that applications by non-profit conservative groups be falsified, so that enemies of the administration could be tried and thrown in jail – in just such up front jargon. This stuff never sees the light of day on the evening news.
The emails to the IRS were inquiring about who at the Justice Department could be counted on to do their part in this scheme.

And I’m sick and tired of being called a bigot by a man who has set back Civil Rights 50 years.

Addenda: Photo IDs just became mandatory in RI for voting. and the Democats had a hissy fit over it.
One state rep exclaimed that the law was unfair because if someone forgot their ID and had to go home and get it, they might not have enough time to come back and vote. that is how lame some people are around here. I blame the water.

Read this link. The Obama admin is targeting specific cities/regions and pushing “New Americans” into these areas for purely political reasons. They know they cannot win elections on their bankrupt ideas, so they will steal it. The fact that GOPS have to know this and sit quietly by and watch it happen is all the proof we need that the fix is in. Both parties are working for the globalists.

Bingo ! Here in RI the idea brought immediate and highly vocal outrage from the public when these PC cadres held meetings in each town and neighborhood explaining how they were going to trash their property. Some of the remarks shouted by these low class political flunkies at these meetings made it onto the radio, causing general outrage, and the whole thing went under deep cover. it has not resurfaced.
It is a lowdown crying shame that the Dipstick in Chief is too smart by half, and may actually think he is accomplishing something by this. But I think he is simply building his support.
He is in for a surprise. These Hispanics are working, they buy homes, they reclaim neighborhoods, and eventually they will protect their property from the likes of the 0bamas moving in. I am not Hispanic but I see this happening in RI, and saw it much more evolved in Austin.
But admitting aliens willy nilly is letting in some of the worst along with the best. And this is part of the admin’s plan too – to destroy America. And the RINOs? absolutely good for nothing.

One day I was listening to the Spanish radio station, and callers were concerned about 0bama’s citizenship – and why shouldn’t they be? Everyone makes such a big deal about theirs, and here’s this guy who became President. That’s how leaders gained power in the countries they escaped from.

The precinct with 100% of the votes for Obama was (I believe) in Philadelphia.

The precinct (one, anyhow) where Obama and the Dems got more votes then registered voters and a Federal judge refused to do anything was here in Florida. It was in 9FORMER) CONGRESSMAN WEST’S DISTRICT, and the liberturds put a lot of $$$ and crooks to defeat him. AFTER ALL, HE WAS BLACK; A HERO; A REPUBLICAN; AND CONSERVATIVE. How dare he leave the plantation and think for himself.

Oliver – sounds about right. I remember the media coming out and labeling Co. West a bigot !!!!! Right now the best black candidates are on the sidelines – Col. West, Dr. Carson, Alan Keyes who is a formidable thinker and debater, but who was passed over for 0bama in the Senate race – and others. I have talked to black people who don’t know who any of these people are.
FL is the poster state for rigged elections anyway, remember the hanging tabs?
This character who led a protest over Ferguson, to block Rt. 95 in RI was on the radio, and a caller asked him if he knew Dr. Ben Carson. And the reaction was, ‘oh that guy, he’s an Uncle Tom, I’m cut from different cloth.’ Obviously he knew nothing of Dr. Carson’s dirt poor childhood. Didn’t matter, Ben Carson blew it all by becoming a brain surgeon.

Allen West drove the Black Caucus crazy. It was great popcorn theater. They are terrified of a strong, articulate black conservative. I think Mia Love scares them even more. Look for them to target her district and try to get rid of her. You can’t have a successful black woman in Congress telling black Americans they can do it on their own.

Not just the Nordics.
In the UK Mohammed/Mehmet is now the most popular boy’s name, as it is in Norway.
The London borough of Tower Hamlets is “only” 30% muslim officially ,and the police are scared stiff of them, and/or corrupted by them.
The mayor a mohammedan extremist, ran the place by corruption and bullying.
Four rate payers, one Pakistani, risked all they had to bring him to a tribunal (cost £1 million) and they won.
He has been thrown out, but his loathsome electorate remains.
In about 25 years all Scandinavia, France and the UK will be over 30% muslim, and we have such evil corruption to look forward to on a national scale.

It’s ok, those white Danish people shouldn’t be in their own country anyway according to the ruling classes. They’ll get a 2 month stint in Danish prison which is probably even nicer than the government provided housing they live in for free.

These folks are going to pay one day. One day they will answer to Almighty God!!!!!!! And His nameis not allah. Jesus Christ who created all will require of them an answer and they will be found lacking. You must stop all your evil wicked ways and turn to Christ.

It appears that the name Allah was in use long before Muhammad was born and was used to designate a god worshipped by a particular tribe. Many of these “gods” were in the Kabba (300+ gods) again before Muhammad was born. The name Allah can also be viewed as the highest god in the polytheist Kabba before it was taken over by Muhammad and became a monotheist Kabba.

So Allah was a generic term that could be applied to a stone god, just as the term god can be applied to some mythical god such as Zeus. Notice that god is not the name of Zeus.

In english god is not the name of God, it is a descriptor of ANY diety of worship.

Islam has re-defined the generic term Allah, previously used in Arab Polytheism, to be the name of a specific god.

As an Agnostic with no horse in this race, even I can see that the sadistic, burn them in Hell, kill them wherever you find them, Allah is not the God of the New Testament.

The idea that one must read and speak Arabic in order to understand Islam is ludicrous. There is nothing magical about Arabic—it can be translated like any other language.

This would be like saying that one cannot understand the first thing about Hitler and the Nazis without being a native speaker of German.

Moreover, it is highly unlikely that “Galen Muhammad” himself reads *classical* Arabic, which is the language of the Qur’an. Again, this would be like saying that no one could be a good Christian unless they had a firm grasp of Latin, classical Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic.

More:

In the meantime, your coreligionists, who are Arabs and still read their Arabic Bibles and refer to God, in their Arabic language, as Allah…..!!
…………………………………………

This is meaningless. The deity Arab Christians call “Allah” just shares a name with the baleful Muslim “Allah”—otherwise, there is no similarity.

In the same way, that would like assuming that English and German speaking Christians worship Odin, because the roots of the word “God” and “Gott” are Teutonic. This is clearly absurd.

More:

We’ll have to assume that you’ll deny God being referred to in other languages as well….
…………………………………………

What absolute rot. Every Christian recognizes that “God” in English, and “Dieu” in French, and “Gott” in German refer to the same Christian God—as does “Allah” if used by Arabic-speaking Christians.

The perverse thing is that Muslims in Malaysia have forbidden Arabic-speaking Christians from using Bibles employing the word “Allah”, since it does not refer to the violent Muslim god.

Language, for all its frequent richness and beauty, is ultimately at root a tool for communication, and there have always been those like this Muslim troll who try to confuse that simple fact.

Ultimately, the loving Christian God could not be more different from the violent and sadistic Allah of the Qur’an, and this is true whatever name one uses for either one.

And note: “Galen Muhammad” says *nothing* about his viscous coreligionists here having attacked an unarmed couple and savagery beating them on Christmas night. No doubt this supremacist Mohammedan approves.

Every week, sometimes more than twice a week, another unbelievable horror is visited on non muslims by this religion of peace. I am astounded at how creative in violence these monsters are.
I would say that these people get what they deserve by being so stupid by ignoring 1400 years of facts and history and continue to import these people into their country. This is like something out or a Monty Python skit. I’m wondering if this woman was once a liberal who supported islam and called people like me racists.
But this women doesn’t deserve what she got. I pray for her to heal. I pray to God to calm my rising anger. I should stop coming to this site. And not read the news.
Rainman…….

Rainman, you should *not* ignore the news. And it is quite possible that even if you chose to do that, that knowledge of the rising threat of Islam will come to you or someone you love in just the way it came this poor young couple—in the form of Muslim violence up close and personal.

I believe that everyone here wishes this were not happening—I know that is certainly true with me. But just as with the rise of Fascism and hard-core Communism, we can’t undo our knowledge about the threat of Islam.

We must, as much as we can, spread the alarm and stand against Jihad and Shari’ah as much as we can. Stay strong. Take a break when you need to, but don’t forget what it is we are fighting for, and what it will mean if we give up.

What’s even more pathetic ,99% of the Muslims in Denmark receive social assistance checks every month of 1,473 euros a month .even when in Prison they still get those checks , thanks to the 30 years of left wing givenrments in Denmark.

They will join the Nazis in Hell. They want to send everything back to pre-history. At least the Nazis appreciated the achievements of those they slaughtered and preserved art and architecture. What god do these savages worship who wants only suffering and evil for his followers? No love, pleasure, compassion or joy.

Scandinavians are too busy stalking Jews and trying to force the honor killers on the Jews. Will they wake up before its too late? This is what the Israelis had to deal with forever. this should be a wake up call. I am sorry for these people, the honor killers should be mandatorily executed, throw out the garbage.

Read the Quran. It is so enlightening…. of the DARK SIDE!!
004.034 Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them, refuse to share their beds, beat them; but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means: For Allah is Most High, great.

A great subduing tactic!!
009.029 Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Nice one Vickie, Galen Muhammadan has obviously come on
here to proselytise. We see how non-muslims are treated
all over the world where Islam has the upper hand – from the
terrible and sickening treatment of Christians in Pakistan, to
territory held by the ‘Islamic State’, to the recently beheaded
Ethiopian Christians and Copts in Libya, to Nigeria etc. Not to
mention, of course, the monstrous treatment of women, acid
attacks in Afghanistan and Iran etc, or the appalling treatment
of animals. Has there ever been a more spectacularly
misunderstood ‘religion’? Why doesn’t he/she/it or whatever go
and explain to them how they’ve got it all wrong instead of trying to
whitewash Islam to people on this site?

I don’t practice Shia socialpractices of taqiyya. There’s no reason for it. I have no sect to hide.

Your rant is proof positive that you don’t know what the HELL you’re babbling!
……………………………..

More narrow word games. “Taqiyya” is a Shia term, but it has become common parlance to describe the wide range of Muslim prevarication.

Technically, “Galen Muhammad” may have been using any of the other Sunni concepts for lying to the “filthy Kuffar”: Kitman, Tawriya, Taysir, Darura, or Maruna, which all come under the rubric of Muda’rat.

He may have no sect to hide, but snowing the Infidels is *always* Muslim practice, until they are in such clear positions of dominance that such obfuscation is no longer necessary to lull non-Muslims into a false sense of security re the Muslim threat.

The most obvious example would be the murderous Islamic State, where we fully see what Islam is when the mask comes off and they openly enslave and slaughter Infidels.

This sanctioned lying goes back to the foul “Prophet”, where Muhammed lied to the natives of Medina about his plans to take over, and blessed assassins lying to their victims in order to get close enough to go in for the kill.

Sunni Muslims like to pretend that because “Taqiyya” is technically a Shi’ite term that the concept has nothing to do with them, but this is, of course, itself more falsehood.

One other point re “Galen Muhammad”: note that he just pursues the nomenclature of Taqiyya red herring, and completely ignores my point about violence against Infidels—and laughing about it—being completely Islamic.

And why not? The whole purpose of Taqiyya (and Mudar’at, and its myriad related tenets) is to distract and obfuscate the threat of Islam.

Allah taught them everything they know, so I’m not surprised they learned the lessons…Their actions and behavior in court give them an A in atrocity, attack, assault, attitude, and some really great Allahu Akbars…They are going to prison, but not to worry, they will be well fed, given prayer rugs and a Quran…and best of all free health care…Allah willing, and he always is…

Most Unfortunate that, European Countries, still not, realised that the Migration of Muslims is Conspiracy Jihad. According to the Teachings for Jihadis, killing and Death give Visa to Janaah (Islamic Paradise). So they will do homicide & Suicide.
Now Europeans are digging own grave fast. In Next Century there won’t be Europe, but Eurabia.

More rot from “Galen Muhammad”. Anyone paying attention to the news, listening to the words of barbaric Jihadists, and reading the Qur’an, Hadith, and Sira can easily determine the sanguinary viciousness of Islam.

None of his sneering can laugh off the over 25,000 Jihad terror attacks all over the world just since 9/11.

And yes—those who speak out against this savage creed, at great personal danger from “Galen Muhammad’s” violent coreligionists, are the very definition of heroes.

The likes of Galen Muhammadan never challenge the Islamic
hate preachers or the terrorists. Instead, they attack the people
who point out the fact that we have a problem. They want to
keep people deceived.

I’m heartened to note that the two articles by the Muslim “Reformer” Zakaria Fellah apparently have been eliminated from Jihad Watch. When one tries to refresh their pages, one gets the error message:

“Not found, error 404

The page you are looking for no longer exists.”

Unfortunately I failed to save one of my recent long comments there. Another one, however, I did save:

With regard to trusting Zakara Fellah (and other Muslims who come along whispering Sweet Moderation in our ears), I wrote:

That’s one function (and effect) of terrorism (which of course includes the ongoing threat of it); it makes us so desperate for a solution, we are “softened up” for the False Moderate to soothe and comfort us with the panacea of an Islamic Reform.

Of course, those out in the mainstream who are more affected (and infected) by PC MC are already predisposed to such a panacea, and the False Moderate hardly has to lift a finger to get them there — often, the gullible Westerner will anxiously set the table for the Taqiyya banquet du jour (“inter-faith seminars”, “counter-terrorism panels”, “academic debates & discussion”, etc.). But we in the Counter-Jihad, in this small precious nucleus of Canaries-in-a-Coalmine—We few, we happy few, we band of brothers (and sisters)—need more prodding and coaxing, because we are relatively warier and more suspicious, more disposed to suspect that our “lying eyes” are in fact telling the truth. Along then comes a Maajid Nawaz, or a Zuhdi Jasser, or a Zakaria Fellah: the Better Cops for a more suspcious (i.e., more knowledgeable) audience who won’t fall for the garden-variety Good Cops who so easily fool the mainstream. And there have been quite a few other Muslims like this whom I’ve noticed pop up in the last couple of years, some more well-known than others. They all have two things in common:

1) they use language that makes it seem like they, unlike most Muslims out there, appreciate the magnitude of the problem of Islam — they “feel our pain”, you see — and they’re willing to throw in some extra bones of rhetoric condemning this, that, and the other Muslim individual, group, and even country (all through sleight-of-hand couched in the clever framework of this problem being recent in history and somehow not indicative of an essential rot at the core of Islam rooted in Muhammad himself); and

2) if we dare to question some of their premises & assumptions that are all transparently, screamingly predicated upon claiming that the Emperor Has Clothes On when we can all plainly see he’s buck naked with his wee willie and balls hanging out in full view, the Muslim “Reformer” starts getting prickly and defensive and pulling out Tu Quoque and other fallacies.

Zuhdi Jasser is perhaps the cleverest of them all. He has even apparently fooled Frank Gaffney and others in the Counter-Jihad. And that, of course, would be the reasonably supposed motive for these “Better Cops”: to infiltrate the Counter-Jihad.

I’ve stumbled upon a sure-fire antidote to all this elaborate nonsense that has forced me to elaborate at length in meticulous (and tedious) detail: Never trust any Muslim no matter what.

Why is that so hard? And when you withhold trust, it has to mean something. We are not merely withholding trust about minor matters; the trust we withhold concerns matters of life or death, whereby the lives of untold millions of our fellow men, women and children are in the balance over the coming decades.

I have to say I hadn’t seen anything of this sort until then/now. I have very mixed feelings about censorship, but it’s a fascinating topic nonetheless. I fully support Robert (obviously) but I also welcome people with jerky ideologies to post… but again, I wouldn’t want to run a site and have Taliban propagandizing. I trust Robert’s judgment for sure.

Posting comments is one thing, but having articles featured at Jihad Watch is another. It is reasonable to suppose (given the analyses of his various responses which JW regular Mirren posted along with my observations at the time) that Zakaria Fellah was slyly purveying and promoting a kind of deeper, cleverer stealth jihad than the norm — a stealth jihad pretending to be reform of Islam. Without any critical editorial warning labels, surely that’s not beneficial for the Counter-Jihad.

I agree with Voeg here, Georg. As for “censorship”, that does not really apply. Robert Spencer is hardly preventing Zakaria Fellah from speaking—his stuff is all over the web.

But no one can demand that someone provide them with a platform. If they could, as you note, Jihad Watch would have to let the Taliban use the site to run Jihad propaganda, which would severely curtail Robert Spencer’s *own* freedom of speech.

I run a couple of websites to showcase my artwork, but I don’t let any random thug use my hosting—and that is not censorship at all.

My God, more crap. The Qur’an is full of exhortations to violence and murder—there are over a hundred such verses in the Qur’an.

Here are just a few:

Quran 5:33: “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement”

Quran 8:12: “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them”

Quran 8:15: “O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them…”

Quran 8:39: “And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah”

Quran 8:67: “It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land…”

Quran 8:59-60: “And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip Allah’s Purpose. Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy.”

And here is the infamous Sura of the Sword, from what is considered the penultimate “revealed” verse:

Quran 9:5: “So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them”

In other words, Infidels are only free of threat if they convert to Islam at sword point.

There are, of course, many more such Suras, as well as scores of Hadith and the baleful model of the vicious “Prophet”. The idea that “Galen Muhammad” is not intimately familiar with these constant calls for violence against the unbelievers simply is not credible.

Instead, he and other supremacist Muslims hope that *we* are not familiar with such violent texts.

A dictionary is not “Islamophobic”—it simply provides definitions of words.

This would be like an Anti-Jihadist considering a dictionary pro-Jihad because it gives the definition of the word. But then, no Anti-Jihadist would be so irrational. Unfortunately, such irrationality is quite common with Muslims.

“Mahound” is a very old reference to the “Prophet” Muhammad, which dates back centuries. “Galen Muhammad” may like like the term, but that does not mean it doesn’t have a very long provenance.

Pious Muslims often believe that they can rewrite history simply by destroying the source—like the Islamic State thugs who recently razed the ruins of several ancient cities in Iraq and Syria—which shows their ugly magical thinking.

English as a second language speakers like Galen often have trouble learning suffixes like “ian”

While, Galen Muhammad must surely know that Mahound was the half Muhammad and half hound dog demon spirit from hell who shed his outer skin in hellfire to turn into the lying Serpent of Satan, he obviously does not realize that the “ian” ending refers to a foolish follower of said beast.

Muhammad the Messenger from Satan
What sings a call of duty to prayer? It hides in his wretched devil’s lair
Seduced by lyrics from Islam’s prophetic liar is a song of Satan’s unholy desire.

I LOVE when you Islamaphobes, who NEVER get it right or have all or any of the facts make such ass umptions.

English is the primary language of those of us born and raised in the US and I am quite literate in my own English language, thank you!!

You have YET to define the aforementioned fabricated and baseless word that I asked to be defined. Instead, you made a sophomoric assumption based on your own limited knowledge, leaving the word in question undefined.

OK. it was a bit unfair of me to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you may have not understood that word due to difficulties using the English language when in fact you suffer from the very common affliction known as Islamic willful ignorance.
Every Muslim knows certain things about Muhammad’s life.
Yet millions of Muslims still make the outrageous claim that Muhammad was a prophet.
Is it really possible to hold an honest conversation with a no god but Allah ranting Muslim who believes Muslims are extra special people because a false prophet caravan raiding thief who owned sex slaves said so?

BTW
Your use of the word ‘genius’ in that sentence should have been in single quotes..

Who was Mohammad (Mahound)
Another commenter on the 80 lashes article reminds us:

Muhammad’s assasin

“The assasian saw she had 5 children, the youngest, a newborn, was sleeping cuddled on the womans chest. The assasian moved this baby, then took a knife and stabbed it down into the womans chest as hard as he could, leaving the children to wake up and discover their mother murdered as they slept.

Muslims across the world wherever you are kneel and take a deep bow.
Bow your heads in shame at the disgrace of the name Muhammad.
Shame on you for even mentioning his name without condemning his filth.

“Galen Muhammad” seems to be implying here that Jay’s citation is some bit of ginned up “Islamophobia”, but nothing could be further from the truth.

This is the story of Asma bint Marwan, and it comes from entirely canonical Islamic texts.

She was a poet and critic of Muhammad, and he had her brutally assassinated as she slept with a baby at her breast.

This, from the classic “Sirat Rasul Allah” (life of the prophet of Allah):

`UMAYR B. `ADIYY’S JOURNEY TO KILL `ASMA’ D. MARWAN She was of B. Umayyya b. Zayd. When Abu `Afak had been killed she displayed disaffection. `Abdullah b. al-Harith b. Al-Fudayl from his father said that she was married to a man of B. Khatma called Yazid b. Zayd. Blaming Islam and its followers she said:

I despise B. Malik and al-Nabit
and `Auf and B. al-Khazraj.
You obey a stranger who is none of yours,
One not of Murad or Madhhij…

Hassan b. Thabit answered her:

Banu Wa’il and B. Waqif and Khatma
Are inferior to B. al-Khazrahj.
When she called for folly woe to her in her weeping,
For death is coming.
She stirred up a man of glorious origin,
Noble in his going out and in his coming in.
Before midnight he dyed her in her blood
And incurred no guilt thereby.

When the apostle heard what she had said he said, “Who will rid me of Marwan’s daughter?” `Umayr b. `Adiy al-Khatmi who was with him heard him, and that very night he went to her house and killed her. In the morning he came to the apostle and told him what he had done and he [Muhammad] said, “You have helped God and His apostle, O `Umayr!” When he asked if he would have to bear any evil consequences the apostle said, “Two goats won’t butt their heads about her”, so `Umayr went back to his people.
…

More, from Ibn Sa`d’s Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir:

SARIYYAH OF `UMAYR IBN `ADI
Then (occurred) the sariyyah of `Umayr ibn `Adi Ibn Kharashah al-Khatmi against `Asma’ Bint Marwan, of Banu Umayyah Ibn Zayd, when five nights had remained from the month of Ramadan, in the beginning of the nineteenth month from the hijrah of the apostle of Allah. `Asma’ was the wife of Yazid Ibn Zayd Ibn Hisn al-Khatmi. She used to revile Islam, offend the prophet and instigate the (people) against him. She composed verses. Umayr Ibn Adi came to her in the night and entered her house. Her children were sleeping around her. There was one whom she was suckling. He searched her with his hand because he was blind, and separated the child from her. He thrust his sword in her chest till it pierced up to her back. Then he offered the morning prayers with the prophet at al-Medina. The apostle of Allah said to him: “Have you slain the daughter of Marwan?” He said: “Yes. Is there something more for me to do?” He [Muhammad] said: “No. Two goats will butt together about her. This was the word that was first heard from the apostle of Allah. The apostle of Allah called him `Umayr, “basir” (the seeing).
…

Neither of these accounts are by “Islamophobes”, and both are quite approving of Muhammad’s having a nonviolent poet and mother assassinated.

“Galen Mohammad’s” only problem here is that we do not share devout Muslims’ approval of this vicious savagery.

The fact is that contemporary Muslims regularly murder critics of Islam, on just this basis. See the recent massacre by “Galen Muhammad’s” pious coreligionists of journalists and cartoonists at Charlie Hebdo in Paris.

A personal aside: the anti-Jihad artwork I’m working on right now is the assassination of Asma bint Marwan. I should have it finished within the week.

Nowhere in that long irrelevant post did you address the disrespect of Prophet Muhammad’s name.
………………………….

“Galen Muhammad” may become enraged at the idea of “disrespect of Prophet MAuhammad’s name”, and his pious coreligionists may riot and kill over it, but decent Infidels have no obligation to show the psychotic “Prophet” any respect at all.

True respect must be earned, but this is not what Muslims like “Galen Muhammad” are asking for—they want to impose Shari’ah norms. We in the Counter Jihad reject this demand.

Only a supremacist Muslim would push the idea that defending oneself from the kind of vicious assault we see in the story above is “racist”. As he would have it, in order to prove we are not “racist” or “Islamophobic”, we should bare our throats to the blade. *Ugh*.

You never answered my questions about the hateful verses
in the Koran – and I take it you never watched the videos
either. At least the hate preachers I referred to and terrorists
are honest, not like you.

Galen, why are you posting comments on Jihad Watch? Shouldn’t you be busy tracking down ISIS and correcting *them* on how badly they’ve misunderstood your precious “holy” quran? Your correctives here are quite misguided. Take aim at the real enemy. C’mon get to it–ándale!

I’m posting here because the lies and half-truths against Islam are being posted here. I know of no social media where #PISIS or other pseudo-Islamic organization are posting lies and distortions against Islam.

Why should I <b<not debunk the lies being spewed here and those spewing those lies? Could it be that you only prefer to read the lies against Islam without them being debunked?

I hope that you strive hard to be worthy of the last name you chose and become successful in defeating your own low desires. But, judging by you inapplicable name-calling rants (“Blowhard Mohammedist” and “creep“), you’re not even doing well in an online exchange….

I’ve asked for people to be specific about the ayats (verses) to which they were referring. So far, no one’s replied.

It’s more than obvious that you did not read my first post to this fact-free blog. I’ll repost it here for you:

Galen Muhammad says

April 24, 2015 at 9:38 am

First and foremost, whipping a woman (or anyone, for that matter) is not Islamic!! It”s brutality.

It’s also inhuman to even consider laughing at the victim of such violence in court!
Reply

I’m posting here because the lies and half-truths against Islam are being posted here. I know of no social media where #PISIS or other pseudo-Islamic organization are posting lies and distortions against Islam.
……………………………………..

Well, *that* is quite a shocking admission.

“Galen Muhammad” is openly agreeing that nothing ISIS says about Islam is false. Good God…

More:

Why should I <b<not debunk the lies being spewed here and those spewing those lies? Could it be that you only prefer to read the lies against Islam without them being debunked?
……………………………………..

Nothing in "Galen Muhammad's" aggressive apologia for evil has debunked any of the savagery of Islam.

More, to Philip Jihadski:

Phillip Jihadski:

I hope that you strive hard to be worthy of the last name you chose and become successful in defeating your own low desires.
……………………………………..

What rot. PJ is clearly using the username "Jihadski" ironically. He is a staunch anti-Jihadist, and stands against the barbarism of violent Jihad.

And what do pious Muslims consider "low desires"? Why, things like having compassion for murdered children:

I’ve asked for people to be specific about the ayats (verses) to which they were referring. So far, no one’s replied.
……………………………………..

Well, this is just a bald-faced lie—and a rather stunning one, since there is evidence right on this very thread that he is being dishonest. When he challenged poster Solange to provide violent Suras of the Qur'an, I did so above:

It’s more than obvious that you did not read my first post to this fact-free blog. I’ll repost it here for you:

Galen Muhammad says

April 24, 2015 at 9:38 am

First and foremost, whipping a woman (or anyone, for that matter) is not Islamic!! It”s brutality.

It’s also inhuman to even consider laughing at the victim of such violence in court!
Reply

So…..no. Don’t extend anything un-Islamic to me.
……………………………………..

Notice that he does not actually cite any Islamic texts condemning whipping or sneering at Infidel victims—nor could he, since they do not exist.

An important further point: when Philip Jihadski challenges "Galen Muhammad" to cite where the violent verses of Islamic texts are supposedly taken out of context, he does not reply at all.

There is a reason for this—Muslim apologists love to cry "taken out of context", but this is meaningless unless they point to specific examples and note exactly *how* these passages are taken out of context.

But they cannot do so, since these passages are accepted by pious Muslims—such as the fine Muslims at ISIS with whom "Galen Muhammad" has no religious disagreement—as presenting a perfect model for Islamic savagery. *Ugh*.

I made no such statements regarding the fake Islamic groups like bozo haram PISIS and their ilk. Their misdeeds conflict and are contrary to the Holy Qur’an & the Hadith.

I have nothing else new for you. As I stated in a previous post, you and your ilk prefer and profess the lies and half-truths against Islam and I cannot change your poisoned minds nor will I even waste my time trying.

Their misdeeds conflict and are contrary to the Holy Qur’an & the Hadith.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ahem! That’s the UNHOLY quran/hadith …

And allah is NOT the God of the Bible …

“Muslims believe that there is no other God besides Allah and that he is the God of the universe. They claim that not only is he their God, but that he is the God of the Jews, the Christians and everyone else. When examining the profile of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and comparing it with Allah’s profile, there are a number of distinct differences between them that can only result in one conclusion: These profiles simply do not match! Allah is NOT the God of the Bible!”

“The Islamic faith, through the teachings of Muhammad, asserts that Allah is God and attempt to place him within the confines of the Holy Scriptures. When the Bible contradicts their teachings, they allege that it is flawed, has been tampered with, and has many errors. They further claim that the Koran, through the teachings of their prophet Muhammad, corrects them. However, it has already been established that Muhammad was both a false prophet and teacher. Therefore, Islam’s allegations are unsupported, baseless and without merit.”

“There are a number of major differences between the God of the Bible and Allah. This chapter will focus upon five reasons why they are not the same. According to the Holy Scriptures, the God of the Bible is the one true God while Allah is a false god.”

1. God’s Begotten Son
2. The Godhead, or Trinity
3. The Crucifixion
4. The God of the Bible Condemns Muhammad
5. The God of the Bible Rejects Allah

I never stated or implied that Judaism, Christianity & Islam were all the same religions with the same theology. You’re WAAY off of the topic.

I was pointing out the facts that the misdeeds of terrorists group were in conflict with and contrary to the teachings of the Holy Qur’an and the Hadith. Your reply did not counter the truth that i just restated!!

You know as well as I do that Muslims have to believe that
every single word of the Koran is the pure and perfect
word of ‘Allah’, applicable for all times and places. Those
words are taken seriously by a huge number across the world
every single day, and all you can do is talk about “context”.
Muhammad said that he had been “ordered” to fight the
“infidels” until they testified that there is no god but “Allah”
and that he is the messenger. Again, you know this perfectly
well and you want to pretend that there’s no problem.
Yes, I will have a problem with Jews when they start
decapitating Christians all over the world, but I don’t see
it. I would have a problem with Christianity if there were
Christian rape gangs across Europe, but I don’t see it.
There’s a huge problem with Muslim grooming gangs
and rapists all across Europe. Malmo in Sweden is the
rape capital of Europe because of guess who.
You are in complete denial and you are still trying to
deceive people. Your coreligionists will ensure that
won’t happen.

Use words like “fact-free” and “sophomoric” as much as you like.
We both know that many, many more atrocities will occur throughout
the world in the name of Islam, people who supposedly ‘misunderstand’
it. There’s no way you can dance your way around that with any of your
terminology.

I’m sure that you are completely correct and their actions have nothing
whatsoever to do with verses such as this, and they just take it out of
“context”, as you so predictably wrote in another post :

Quran Surah 8: The Spoils of War

Allah will throw fear into the hearts of the disbelievers, and smite their
necks and fingers. 12
Disbelievers will be tormented in the Fire. 14
When you fight with disbelievers, do not retreat. Those who do will
go to hell. 15-16
Taste of the doom because ye disbelieve. 35
Those who disbelieve will be gathered into hell. 36
The angels smite the face and backs of disbelievers,
saying: “Taste the punishment of burning!” 50
The worst beasts in Allah’s sight are the disbelievers. 55
Exhort the believers to fight. They will win easily, because
disbelievers are without intelligence. 65
A prophet may not take captives until he has made a slaughter
in the land. 67

Here’s more things out of “context” that are ‘misunderstood’
by ISIS, Boko Haram etc. And it’s obviously me just
imagining all this :

Surah 9: Repentance

Give tidings (O Muhammad) of a painful doom to those who
disbelieve. 3
Slay the idolaters wherever you find them. 5
Don’t let idolaters tend the sanctuaries. Their works are in
vain and they will be burned in the Fire. 17
Give tiding of a painful doom to Christians and Jews. 34
If you refuse to fight, Allah will afflict you with a painful doom. 39
Disbelievers go to hell. 49
Those who vex the Prophet, for them there is a painful doom. 60
Those who oppose Allah and His messenger will burn in the
fire of hell. 63
Allah promises hypocrites and disbelievers the fire of hell.
Allah curses them. They will have a lasting torment. 68
Fight the disbelievers and hypocrites. Be harsh with them.
They are all going to hell anyway. 73
Allah will afflict disbelievers with a painful doom in this world
and the Hereafter. 74
For disbelievers there will be a painful doom. 90
Don’t pray for idolaters (not even for your family) after it is clear
they are people of hell-fire. 113
Fight disbelievers who are near you, and let them see the
harshness in you. 123

“By their fruits ye shall know them” – misogyny, child rape,
child mutilation, religious persecution, animal cruelty,
terrorism, hate mongering, deception, self-pity,
25, 676 Jihadi outrages since 9/11 alone – and I am
sure I’m only scratching the surface, and people still
try to deceive us about Islam and keep a straight face.
It would be funny if it wasn’t so obscene.

By Conspiracy Jihad, Lure Jihad, Deceptive Jihad, Biological Jihad etc, the Population of Allah’s Soldiers are Rising Very Fast.; thereby Allah will get more Blood in future days/weeks, months, years from Europe with abetment of Governments there.
Present day Governments of European Countries are happy to take Conspiracy Jihadi Migrants, but Not at all Willing to take any Christian who is being Tortured in Muslim Countries!

More meretriciousness. Truth Seeker does not mean by “Deceptive Jihad” that the Jihad is false, but that it is Jihad *by deception*—in other words, by Taqiyya or one or another sort of Muda’rat. These are all forms of Muslim lying in order to soften up the Infidels.

That is, of course, *exactly* what “Galen Muhammad” himself is engaged in here.

To employ the Shia social practice of taqiyya, one first must be Shia (I am NOT SHIA!!). I am simply a Muslim….belonging to no sect! Secondly, that person employing such a social practice would have to be in a vast majority Sunni area…..in the Middle East somewhere (again not applicable, as I am NOT in such an area).

You stated, “He hopes that if he addresses such a narrow point, that the good Infidels here will not realize that he is constantly engaged in dishonesty here in order to whitewash Islam.”

Are you stating that all of you are atheists…? I’m correcting your vocabulary. I’m not familiar with the other word that you use or its concept, so the likelihood of my applying it here or ever is zero to none.

Deceptive Jihad is that, where in the victim will come to know, he/she is trapped only after embracing Islam, but No way to Escape.
There are 12 ways of Jihad in Operation. Open Jihadis resort to Terror, Horror, Torture etc. The rest are used by Stealth Jihadis. Now in Europe the latter is predominant. As the strength rises, the Former will come to force. Day is not far.

This doctrine you speak of….the one you or someone recently invented….I’ve never heard of it nor will I apply it when speaking of Islam or any other matter. I’ve found that it’s better to speak the truth, as we are encouraged to do in Islam.

In fact, everything in your post is a babbling rant as it does not apply to any form of jihad that Muslims practice. The most important jihad is the struggle to control one’s own low desires. The only physical jihad is in self defense. There is no “jihad” for aggressively attacking someone. That’s called aggressively attacking someone. Period.

It only deceives the ignorant when you use Islamic terms and assign your own devious meanings to them without your own apparent grasp of the most basic terms as you’ve just obliterated the true meaning of jihad to fashion it into your own word and definition(s).

In fact, everything in your post is a babbling rant as it does not apply to any form of jihad that Muslims practice. The most important jihad is the struggle to control one’s own low desires. The only physical jihad is in self defense. There is no “jihad” for aggressively attacking someone….

Jihad: It does NOT mean what you claim that it means.
……………………………….

What meretricious nonsense. Only a tiny percentage of the references to Jihad in the orthodox texts of Islam refer to anything *other* than offensive aggression.

The entire ugly history of Islam bears this out.

Aggressively insisting on a lie does not make it so.

“Galen Muhammed” tries to bully Infidels into ignoring the evidence right before their eyes. Of course, where Muslims are in positions of power, the need for dissembling is past, and the mask comes off.

Nothing in the Holy Qur’an has misled you to beleive that jihad even implies the killing of innocent people.

This is where you should be employing basic common sense and basic reading comprehension.

IF Galen Muhammad was my nickname, then and ONLY then would it make sense to put said “nnickname” in quotations. Is that proof that you lack the skills of proper use of punctuation…..or is English a second or perhaps third language of yours?

Now what are happening is known to all who have Freedom to access News. Is ISIS, Taliban, Boko Haram etc doing Self Defence?
In this Century, Terrorism has a Great Spurt. Why? Islamic Population is about or slightly more than 20%. Now the Confidence is that, the strength is enough to finish Kafirs.
Therefore, this sort of attacks will be on the rise and Abettors will continue to justify saying, those who does this sort of cruelties doesn’t know the meaning of the word, or don’t understand the teaching etc etc. In certain cases they may even condemn the crime, but that is will be eyewash.
Anyway Cruelties on Innocents will rise only because it is proportional to the strength of Self Certified Super ReligionS

In the first year of Belshazzar king of Babylon Daniel had a dream and visions of his head upon his bed: then he wrote the dream, and told the sum of the matters.

Daniel spake and said, I saw in my vision by night, and, behold, the four winds of the heaven strove upon the great sea.
And four great beasts came up from the sea, diverse one from another.
Daniel 7
The first was like a lion,(lion of Justice symbol of England) and had eagle’s wings: I beheld till the wings thereof were plucked, and it was lifted up from the earth, and made stand upon the feet as a man, (Uncle Sam and the eagle) and a man’s heart was given to it. (England and the USA)

Revelation 6
And I saw when the Lamb opened one of the seals, and I heard, as it were the noise of thunder, one of the four beasts saying, Come and see.
And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer. (Christian Nations)

Daniel 7
And behold another beast, a second, like to a bear, (symbol of Russia red bear) and it raised up itself on one side, and it had three ribs in the mouth of it between the teeth of it: and they said thus unto it, Arise, devour much flesh. (Russia or communist)

Revelation 6
And when he had opened the second seal, I heard the second beast say, Come and see.
And there went out another horse that was red: and power was given to him that sat thereon to take peace from the earth, and that they should kill one another: and there was given unto him a great sword (Red Communist)

Daniel 7
After this I beheld, and lo another, like a leopard, which had upon the back of it four wings of a fowl; the beast had also four heads; and dominion was given to it. (China or Asian descent )

Revelation 6
And when he had opened the third seal, I heard the third beast say, Come and see. And I beheld, and lo a black horse; and he that sat on him had a pair of balances in his hand.
And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine. (Trade)

Daniel 7
After this I saw in the night visions, and behold a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and strong exceedingly; and it had great iron teeth: it devoured and brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with the feet of it: and it was diverse from all the beasts that were before it; and it had ten horns. (Middle East)

Revelation 6
And when he had opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth beast say, Come and see.
And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.
(Muslims)

Dan 2
{And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron: forasmuch as iron breaketh in pieces and subdueth all things: and as iron that breaketh all these, shall it break in pieces and bruise.
And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, (5 on each foot not together as yet) part of potters’ clay, and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay.
And as the toes of the feet (10 Nations no fully together yet) were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken.
And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, (Muslims are all over the world) even as iron is not mixed with clay. (Now you know why the Muslims can’t get along with each other)
And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.
Forasmuch as thou sawest that the stone was cut out of the mountain without hands, (Jesus) and that it brake in pieces the iron, the brass, the clay, the silver, and the gold; the great God hath made known to the king what shall come to pass hereafter: and the dream is certain, and the interpretation thereof sure.}

Dan 7
I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things.
Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.
And the ten horns (10 toes(10 Nations no fully together yet) out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.
And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: ( Shariah Law ) and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time. (3-1/2 years)

Revelation 12 Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.
And when the dragon saw that he was cast unto the earth, he persecuted the woman which brought forth the man child.
And to the woman were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, (3-1/2 years) from the face of the serpent.
And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood.
And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth.
And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.

Dan 7
But the judgment shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion, to consume and to destroy it unto the end.
And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him.
Hitherto is the end of the matter. As for me Daniel, my cogitations much troubled me, and my countenance changed in me: but I kept the matter in my heart.

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer. in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to its respectful owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.