form posted that conferences with a ranked pair (or player, for the singles) get a place in the draw. So we can expect to see pairs like no. 37 Holly Dowse / Emma Hayman (College of Charleston) in the draw. I think.

form posted that conferences with a ranked pair (or player, for the singles) get a place in the draw. So we can expect to see pairs like no. 37 Holly Dowse / Emma Hayman (College of Charleston) in the draw. I think.

If I was going to guess and take the players with multiple doubles rankings in top 32 and only use that persons best ranked team and eliminate the others, this would be my prediction on the individual doubles.

* If a student-athlete would have been selected to the championship with two different partners, that
student-athlete has the ability to be an alternate in the draw with the other partner. This only comes
into play if the student-athlete not listed on both teams is unable to participate.

* If a student-athlete would have been selected to the championship with two different partners, that
student-athlete has the ability to be an alternate in the draw with the other partner. This only comes
into play if the student-athlete not listed on both teams is unable to participate.

I dont want to sound like a homer but Michigan's No. 1 doubles team which is ranked No. 19 and has won 15 matches in a row, I think is very under-rated. I will be anxious to see how they do against Tennessee's No. 1 ranked team of Whoriskey/Pluskota on Thursday when they play them.

Here is the Doubles Draw for tomorrow. I look at this and wonder if they pull the names out of a hat when picking the draw. Some of these dont make sense based on their national ranking posted to the left.
Would someone that knows what they are talking about please comment on how the draws are put together?