UNIDENTIFIED MALE REPORTER: Can you just real quickly, did they set up a tent in the parking lot?

CARVER: It wasn't a tent. It was this magnificent thing. And it's sectional and it sticks together with Velcro and then they stake it to the ground and electricity and lights appear from the department of emergency management. And I think it came from the army but I'm not sure. I think it's these things that they use in to set up field hospitals very quickly, mobile hospitals.

You are obviously a shill, and you have some intelligence to you. Consider what a Goddamned fool you are. You get paid a paltry sum by some arm/division of the crypto-government-media-military complex, to discredit truth-seekers, patriots, and courageous whistleblowers. You should hang your head in shame. Cowardly, dastardly, misguided, weak-willed, shill!

Quoting: The Sonic Dreamer

Ad hom "shill" bullshit which is what everyone here resorts to when they have no logical answer.

You think the military or anyone else would have any interest at all in coming here and arguing with you? You're a bunch of armchair Kojaks who are only significant inside your own heads.

You are obviously a shill, and you have some intelligence to you. Consider what a Goddamned fool you are. You get paid a paltry sum by some arm/division of the crypto-government-media-military complex, to discredit truth-seekers, patriots, and courageous whistleblowers. You should hang your head in shame. Cowardly, dastardly, misguided, weak-willed, shill!

Quoting: The Sonic Dreamer

Ad hom "shill" bullshit which is what everyone here resorts to when they have no logical answer.

You think the military or anyone else would have any interest at all in coming here and arguing with you? You're a bunch of armchair Kojaks who are only significant inside your own heads.

We may never know, but I find it intereting that in this video another user posted at the end for the "de-programming" after implanting cues to rob a bank truck, they are sent to a "tent" which seems pretty "magnificent" to me.

You can't just drag some guy and tons of other people into a MASS HOMICIDE by playing 6 degrees of separation.

This thread has been DEBUNKED due to bad information.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24433809

Apparently you ARE A TARD as well. It is NOT "6 degrees of separation" that is being documented here. It is that the people that MAKE MACHINE GUNS AND SELL THEM ILLEGALLY, STEAL COPPER, SELL DRUGS, ETC. are all related to one another by BLOOD -- a giant many-familied-MAFIA-LIKE "Family" that, just so happens, was involved in MURDERING 20 tiny children and 6 teachers. Lanza family is blood relatives with Chris Rodia family is blood relatives with Cassandra Scire family is blood relatives to Uzar family is blood relatives to Coppola family, etc. And they all live in that immediate vicinity and they sell machine guns, drugs, work in pharmaceuticals quality control, work in gigantic financial empires, steal copper, use oxycontin and sell it, illegally sell machine guns with filed-off serial numbers, etc.

And you want to tell me that, "oh this is just not so" and "you are finding random relationships." I say you are either a TARD or a SHILL.

Disprove my above contention with fact -- you can't -- or STFU.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30761302

And apparently Rodia was pulled over for speeding, just 20 minutes or so after the shooting stopped.

HMMMM. Wonder what he was speeding away from..

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30662905

I know this was many pages ago and I don't know if this was mentioned before, but WHY would any cops anywhere near where a mass shooting had just taken place be making traffic stops?! That seems a little strange to me. I would think any LE would be at the scene unless an emergency call came through. Really, I do not see how it's possible for LE to be pulling over speeders anywhere even remotely close to a school shooting. Especially in a smallish town where they would need all the police presence they could get from neighboring areas.

"The government is like a baby's alimentary canal, with a happy appetite at one end, and no responsibility at the other." ~Ronald Reagan

carver is very like john goodmanhis movements his voicethe way he stands

prosthetics?

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31203579

1. Get your eyes checked.

2. Get your head checked.

Ya know, I come to GLP occasionally hoping to find some insightful information. Occasionally I find some. More often than not, I find that most of the people here are on the lunatic fringe. Strike that. Not on the fringe. They fell down the lunatic chasm.

Are you sure the CT medical examiner wasn't Tom Cruise? Perhaps he is reprising his role from Aurora? I mean, I know Tom isn't that big, but did you see his role in Tropic Thunder? Yeah, prosthetics! The magic of Hollywood! Wow, you're blowing the case wide open. I like Johnny Depp. Did Johnny Depp have a role in this too? What part did he play?

Shills, idiots, lunatics... so much for finding any intelligent life here.

First post here, so please excuse if I do something clumsy. And please don't take offense.

I wanted to point out something about the (alleged) parents that occurred to me and would make sense. It does look to me like we're seeing (at least some) people presented by the news who were not actually family members of shooting victims. If you have lost someone, this does not need to be explained. If I had just lost a child in the way described, I don't think I would be able to form sentences or even get myself dressed for at least several days. I would have trouble just going on living. This is something that ruins people's lives, destroys marriages, and drives people to suicide. Check out the difference between this and the parents dealing with their children's corpses during the Gaza bombings from just before SH. It's just not comparable.

That said -- I think that the actors-on-the-news thing has been going on for years and possibly decades, based on similar video from previous disasters (yes with some obvious ones planted for political reasons). With this possibility in mind, a logical question is why would any actual families of victims tolerate the deception? And there's a simple answer -- such devastated people would probably consider it a kindness for some actor to step in and spare them the public attention. I think it's entirely plausible that this is a standard "service" that law enforcement simply provides in such situations.

I haven't seen anyone mention this possibility yet, but would it be conceivable? It's feasible, there are reasons to do it (protection and privacy of any real victims), and there are reasons why all the players would agree. Does anyone have inside knowledge of this sort of practice? I guess if this really were protocol that a lot of people would have to know about it (like police and firemen) and it couldn't stay a secret.

To be clear, I'm not saying that SH was on the up and up, and I don't think that the official story is at all plausible. I'm just wondering if we're missing a simple practice about who actually gets presented on the news.Thanks for any thoughts -- this is hard for me to sort out, and I only recently started to realize that I am living through the largest scam that mankind has known.

First post here, so please excuse if I do something clumsy. And please don't take offense.

I wanted to point out something about the (alleged) parents that occurred to me and would make sense. It does look to me like we're seeing (at least some) people presented by the news who were not actually family members of shooting victims. If you have lost someone, this does not need to be explained. If I had just lost a child in the way described, I don't think I would be able to form sentences or even get myself dressed for at least several days. I would have trouble just going on living. This is something that ruins people's lives, destroys marriages, and drives people to suicide. Check out the difference between this and the parents dealing with their children's corpses during the Gaza bombings from just before SH. It's just not comparable.

That said -- I think that the actors-on-the-news thing has been going on for years and possibly decades, based on similar video from previous disasters (yes with some obvious ones planted for political reasons). With this possibility in mind, a logical question is why would any actual families of victims tolerate the deception? And there's a simple answer -- such devastated people would probably consider it a kindness for some actor to step in and spare them the public attention. I think it's entirely plausible that this is a standard "service" that law enforcement simply provides in such situations.

I haven't seen anyone mention this possibility yet, but would it be conceivable? It's feasible, there are reasons to do it (protection and privacy of any real victims), and there are reasons why all the players would agree. Does anyone have inside knowledge of this sort of practice? I guess if this really were protocol that a lot of people would have to know about it (like police and firemen) and it couldn't stay a secret.

To be clear, I'm not saying that SH was on the up and up, and I don't think that the official story is at all plausible. I'm just wondering if we're missing a simple practice about who actually gets presented on the news.Thanks for any thoughts -- this is hard for me to sort out, and I only recently started to realize that I am living through the largest scam that mankind has known.

a lunatic at sandy hookdue to his act our rights they tookliberals grabbing at the gunsbecause a lib would rather runthan face this psycho with a 9and end his mad rampage in timeto save the kids who now are deadby putting one right through his headdisarm the people, for the kidswithout the guns, we would be ridof silly things like self defenseso the souls of sandy hook can restthat's the logic that you seeemotional conmen on TVhere in the land of the freethat logic doesnt sit with me

in anycase this was definitely an inside job aimed at helping along the liberal agenda of turning america into neo-communist europe.

Marilyn Gudsnuk, eye-witness in the school neighborhood says two small boys running down the sidewalk screaming, a black car, then police cars, then she hears shots.

In other words, police cars at/on the scene before the shooting starts.

Comments at this vid state that witness was quoted in the paper saying she heard 12 shots.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31243267

Possible explanation: This eye-witness only heard shots outside the school building. These would be the shots fired into the teacher's car. She is saying the police were there, so SH police know how the bullet holes got in the car.

Also troubling is the description of shooting inside the building as "pop, pop, pop." That is not what long rifles sound like. It's more of a "boom." Only a small caliber pistol makes a popping sound.

First post here, so please excuse if I do something clumsy. And please don't take offense.

I wanted to point out something about the (alleged) parents that occurred to me and would make sense. It does look to me like we're seeing (at least some) people presented by the news who were not actually family members of shooting victims. If you have lost someone, this does not need to be explained. If I had just lost a child in the way described, I don't think I would be able to form sentences or even get myself dressed for at least several days. I would have trouble just going on living. This is something that ruins people's lives, destroys marriages, and drives people to suicide. Check out the difference between this and the parents dealing with their children's corpses during the Gaza bombings from just before SH. It's just not comparable.

That said -- I think that the actors-on-the-news thing has been going on for years and possibly decades, based on similar video from previous disasters (yes with some obvious ones planted for political reasons). With this possibility in mind, a logical question is why would any actual families of victims tolerate the deception? And there's a simple answer -- such devastated people would probably consider it a kindness for some actor to step in and spare them the public attention. I think it's entirely plausible that this is a standard "service" that law enforcement simply provides in such situations.

I haven't seen anyone mention this possibility yet, but would it be conceivable? It's feasible, there are reasons to do it (protection and privacy of any real victims), and there are reasons why all the players would agree. Does anyone have inside knowledge of this sort of practice? I guess if this really were protocol that a lot of people would have to know about it (like police and firemen) and it couldn't stay a secret.

To be clear, I'm not saying that SH was on the up and up, and I don't think that the official story is at all plausible. I'm just wondering if we're missing a simple practice about who actually gets presented on the news.Thanks for any thoughts -- this is hard for me to sort out, and I only recently started to realize that I am living through the largest scam that mankind has known.

Quoting: TryingToMakeSense

I don't think so. You seem to suggest that there is a benevolent reason to use actors to pretend to be parents of victims; namely to spare the grieving parents the pain of speaking publicly about their loss. None of thee parents have to speak publicly anyway; no one is making them. The "media" would have to be in on the deception, representing actors as real parents. Either that, or completely derelict in their vetting duties. Then there'd be the added risk for the media of getting caught perpetrating the fraud.

Were actors used in Sandy Hook? I don't know. Possibly. But were they used to spare the grieving parents? I highly doubt that.

Why would Adam have the presence of mind (or even care) about destroying his own hard drive so efficiently when he was planning on killing his mother, the children, and then committing suicide?

No-- somebody else felt that they had to destroy that hard drive-- perhaps Adam or his Mom, had been communicating with the Rodias. Perhaps she purchased handcrafted weapons from the Rodia family, who were then used to set the Lanza family up, since Rodia family members were facing larceny and drug charges.

Only a subpoena of the server and all emails exchanged would reveal who Adam communicated with in the days prior to the murders.

The fact that Adam ostensibly was driving-- and had guns in-- Chris Rodia's car is EXTREMELY weird--- to say the least.

Did Adam even have a driver's license in the state of Connecticut? Maybe Rodia drove Adam to the scene, and that's why CHris Rodia was found running in the woods-- since he had no vehicle to drive back home in. Maybe Rodia was a patsy, too, and did not know why he was told to drive Adam to the scene, and then when the action happened, he fled into the woods.

What's even more weird is that the press is not all over the fact that the car was not registered to Adam Lanza's mother, but was registered to Rodia.. and instead of good journalism, we are being subjected to interviews with strange grieving parents with perpetual GRINS on their faces. The whole thing is BIZARRE.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2924495

Excellent points - absolutely on the money. Also - why would one guy bring in all those hand guns only to use the rifle? The rifle was reported left behind in the car- then later blamed for all the deaths ?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE REPORTER: Can you just real quickly, did they set up a tent in the parking lot?

CARVER: It wasn't a tent. It was this magnificent thing. And it's sectional and it sticks together with Velcro and then they stake it to the ground and electricity and lights appear from the department of emergency management. And I think it came from the army but I'm not sure. I think it's these things that they use in to set up field hospitals very quickly, mobile hospitals.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31114463

He may or may not have been referring to the National Disaster Medical System "DMORT" sent from DMORT region 2 of 10.

The presence of the DMORT is the smoking gun as to federal level black ops involvment. Anything else is a distraction.

"At approximately 10:00 a.m., Danbury Hospital scrambled extra medical personnel in expectation of having to treat numerous victims. Three wounded patients were evacuated to the hospital, where two children were later declared dead.[53] The other was an unidentified adult. The New York City medical examiner dispatched a [Candyman DMORT Region II] portable morgue to assist with the aftermath.

see the 2 "prequels" links listed at the beginning of the article for a better idea of DMORT's role in deep terror psyops. There are other reports on the site as well to give further history, and explaining the other special technologies used in conjunction with DMORT assignments.

First post here, so please excuse if I do something clumsy. And please don't take offense.

I wanted to point out something about the (alleged) parents that occurred to me and would make sense. It does look to me like we're seeing (at least some) people presented by the news who were not actually family members of shooting victims. If you have lost someone, this does not need to be explained. If I had just lost a child in the way described, I don't think I would be able to form sentences or even get myself dressed for at least several days. I would have trouble just going on living. This is something that ruins people's lives, destroys marriages, and drives people to suicide. Check out the difference between this and the parents dealing with their children's corpses during the Gaza bombings from just before SH. It's just not comparable.

That said -- I think that the actors-on-the-news thing has been going on for years and possibly decades, based on similar video from previous disasters (yes with some obvious ones planted for political reasons). With this possibility in mind, a logical question is why would any actual families of victims tolerate the deception? And there's a simple answer -- such devastated people would probably consider it a kindness for some actor to step in and spare them the public attention. I think it's entirely plausible that this is a standard "service" that law enforcement simply provides in such situations.

I haven't seen anyone mention this possibility yet, but would it be conceivable? It's feasible, there are reasons to do it (protection and privacy of any real victims), and there are reasons why all the players would agree. Does anyone have inside knowledge of this sort of practice? I guess if this really were protocol that a lot of people would have to know about it (like police and firemen) and it couldn't stay a secret.

To be clear, I'm not saying that SH was on the up and up, and I don't think that the official story is at all plausible. I'm just wondering if we're missing a simple practice about who actually gets presented on the news.Thanks for any thoughts -- this is hard for me to sort out, and I only recently started to realize that I am living through the largest scam that mankind has known.

Quoting: TryingToMakeSense

I don't think so. You seem to suggest that there is a benevolent reason to use actors to pretend to be parents of victims; namely to spare the grieving parents the pain of speaking publicly about their loss. None of thee parents have to speak publicly anyway; no one is making them. The "media" would have to be in on the deception, representing actors as real parents. Either that, or completely derelict in their vetting duties. Then there'd be the added risk for the media of getting caught perpetrating the fraud.

Were actors used in Sandy Hook? I don't know. Possibly. But were they used to spare the grieving parents? I highly doubt that.

Quoting: GladioDaddy-O

I'm not implying benevolence. I am suggesting a pretense (of benevolence) that could be used to gain a family's acceptance while the govt/media spin some story or present actors. I am wondering if this practice is in place yet. (People ask why actual victims would tolerate such a thing -- this is a proposed answer.) Families would be the group most likely to call out a bogus story + investigation, so I would expect that anyone wanting to perpetrate such a false flag or hoax would either want to 1) minimize actual victims, or 2) have a prepared plan to remove victims' families from the scene + investigation afterward. Think about it -- if this is a false flag, then they had a plan in place ahead of time for handling the families (who would be easy to railroad early on).

I would expect no resistance from the media to such a practice, but maybe this isn't an offered service yet. Does anyone know if there's any local or independent media verifying who the victims were, or any information about the families? Or interviewing locals?