Please log in

Register now for free

First Name *

Last Name *

Email *

A valid e-mail address. All e-mails from the system will be sent to this address. The e-mail address is not made public and will only be used if you wish to receive a new password or wish to receive certain news or notifications by e-mail.

“Because memory and record were often compounded over centuries by legend, myth and misunderstanding, we generally know much more about the afterlives of early Muslims than we do their actual lives,” observes Robinson. Undaunted, he offers a beautifully written, well-illustrated set of brief, vividly drawn portraits, in which expected names – Muhammad and ‘A’isha, Saladin, Ibn Rushd (or Averroes), Mehmed II and “sheep-rustler, world-conqueror” Timur – share space with saints, poets, polymaths, physicians, courtesans and calligraphers.

It certainly wasn’t just the Reds. Addressing, with painstaking rigour, a “gap in the literature” that here indicates the silencing of suffering on a nightmarishly vast scale, Gebhardt considers the countless Germans (some 860,000 women and many men) subjected to sexual violence in the aftermath of the war. “The women raped by Russian soldiers were at least afforded some recognition, even if it was manipulated for ideological ends…The women violated by GIs, British and French soldiers, by contrast, were, if anything, punished with contempt.” A harrowing and highly recommended work of scholarship.

No, we aren’t going to hell in a handbasket full of , the “Face with Tears of Joy” emoji that Oxford Dictionaries chose as Word of the Year in 2015. Danesi argues for emoji’s study-worthiness, reassuring harrumphers that “the five traditional canons of rhetorical language can easily be discerned in emoji usage”: inventio, dispositio, elocutio, memoria and actio. He unpicks code-switching, calquing, adjacency pair variation, adjunctive use and the globalisation of communications; considers whether the popularity of the poop emoji in Canada reveals a fondness for ironic stoicism; and asks whether emoji are a “real revolution in how we communicate” or “just a passing fad”.

The red, the white and the grey matter: a neuroscientist selflessly undertakes flagon-focused research – including sundry Bordeaux vintages on the Château Pétrus and Dominus Estate – in tireless pursuit of his theory that taste is an illusion. In fact, it’s really all about fluid biomechanics, the physiology of the mouth and throat, retronasal smell and the motor activity of swallowing. Amaze fellow tipplers with knowing references to the integration of congruent cross-modal stimuli, and don’t miss the wine-tasting tutorial in the appendix. Santé!

Neoliberal con, 2012’s future of higher education, 2016’s busted flush, or “just one more form of media”? In a brief study bristling with subheadings, point-form pronunciations, data-dump detail and boldface, Waks looks “beyond the conventional higher education paradigm” – yes, that old thing – to point to Moocs’ antecedents, pay due heed to the developing world, and argue that such courses “can accomplish tasks the critics claim they cannot” and even “make professors better at contemporary academic work”. The final boldface subheading, “From Jobs to ‘Gigs’”, and the comment that “the employment of professionals is…costly to organizations” may not reassure sceptics.