Just As Tuskegee Treatment-Denial Experiment (Phase-I) Was Being Exposed and Shut Down,

Lyme Epidemic Begins

A protracted vaccine development and marketing exercise carried out by creating a synthetic epidemic through the biowarfare infrastructure?

Vaccines Developed Through Treatment-Denial and Marketed Through Synthetic Epidemic

####

For a disease that's "hard to catch and easy to cure"--the "party line" of Steere-Camp, government-grant sanctioned "gate-keepers"-- there sure is a lot of high-level interest on the part of the "biowarfare community," including several biowarfare lab directors, who double as Lyme [non-] treatment experts...

As Emma Hitt explained in Nature Medicine, the cost-effectiveness argument for a vaccine (“savings per case averted”) only made sense if a 500% increase in infection rates took place:

“A cost-effectiveness analysis of the Lyme disease vaccine by the CDCindicates that the use of Lymerix vaccine is justified only in areas in whichthe incidence of Lyme disease is high.

They found that the mean net savings of vaccination per case averted is$3,377 if the probability of contracting Lyme disease is estimated at 0.03.However, the probability of contracting Lyme disease is, in all but a fewareas, less than 0.005.”

The CDC vaccine-marketability authors found that, within parameter valuesestimated to be accurate at the time when the first Lyme vaccine was being marketed, increasing the probability of Lyme disease to 1%-3% would make the vaccine appear cost-effective. The problem was that, except for a few isolated areas, this proposed probability of contracting Lyme was far higher than actual infection rates.

• Were CDC policies put into place to correct this?

• Were CDC-trained epidemiologists (EIS), such as Allen Steere, put in place to justify disastrous policies to make the vaccine cost-effective, as outlined in this CDC-authored publication?

• Does this explain the decades of outrageous CDC policies to the detriment of the public, allowing Lyme disease to spread generally and its effects to worsen individually beyond what they would have with proper treatment so that a vaccine could be justified from a financial standpoint?