"We've tried to distill all the arguments and our recommendation to both the Parliament and the people of New Zealand is to read this report and come to a deeper understanding of what's been asked around assisted suicide and euthanasia."

"As I look at it myself, the arguments are quite compelling that while we understand why people ask for this, it's equally an issue for public safety and not a prudent step to make."

Simon O'Connor

O'Connor stated that in his personal view, the report did not indicate that assisted dying should be legalised. O'Connor told Davison:

"It is about actually understanding the arguments for and against and making a decision about which ones are correct."

"It is very difficult to see how there could be sufficient safeguards to actually protect vulnerable people in New Zealand. And that's been the experience overseas as well."

"It probably comes down to the simple question of 'How many errors would Parliament would be willing to accept in this space?'"

And while there were some doctors who supported a change, there was strong opposition from some parts of the medical profession who said it was not compatible with their work.

The Committee report concludes by stating that:

"This issue is clearly very complicated, very divisive and extremely contentious.

"We therefore encourage everyone with an interest in the subject to read the report in full and to draw their conclusions based on the evidence we have presented."

The New Zealand Herald article concludes by stating that the bill to legalize euthanasia that has been introduced by David Seymour is unlikely to be debated before the next election.Congratulations to the leaders of Euthanasia Free New Zealandand everyone who made a submission to the Committee.