Quick Question for the Politically Astute Australians Who Happen to Be On.

I expect this to be a short and quick thread. It's not even my idea. It was prompted by a thread bemoaning the re-entry into Australian poitics of
a woman connected to the One Nation party. When I looked at the source article I noticed several other stories and this one caught my eye.

It seems so counter-intuitive that I suspected a misprint. I'm just hoping for someone to explain it to me.

The Fair Work Commission has approved a 2.6 per cent increase in the minimum wage.

The decision will deliver a rise of $15.80 per week to Australia's lowest paid workers.

The increase affects 1.5 million people, and will take their weekly wage to $622.20.

Justice Iain Ross told the hearing factors including an expected increase in the unemployment rate led to the commission's decision.

"In addition to these considerations, the superannuation guarantee increase to apply from 1 July this year has also been a moderating factor in our
assessment of the adjustment that should be made to minimum wages."

Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Peter Anderson says the minimum wage rise is a body blow for the small end of town.

"That is $1.5 billion of increased wages that have to be funded by Australia’s small and medium business community," he said. (Emphasis
added)

So, unemployment is going up and the government wants to raise salaries and pensions for the workers? How will that encourage business to hire more
people? Making hiring more expensive will increase employment?

Oh the Government doesn't care who pays for the Minimum wage increase...
They are just looking at how much more Tax revenue it will create.

ETA:
The Government doesn't truly care about Unemployment.
As you point out, this will not drive unemployment down, but up.

This might however make employers look for more educated people to ensure they get the biggest bang for their buck.
In industries where this would be needed... Macca's and Hungry Jacks will be business as usual

Well....
I just see this as a massive slap in the face. Very quickly and rather quietly the Victorian Parliament held hands and actually agreed upon
something! Good for them... Except, the bipartisan support was for...

New MPs will also get a better superannuation deal under big changes to parliamentary salaries and allowances. The bipartisan legislation proposes
increasing backbenchers' wages by eight per cent and a 15 per cent increase for shadow ministers and the Opposition leader. Ministers and the Premier
would get a 2.5 per cent pay rise. The budget for the Opposition leader would also increase by $500,000 a year, to $2 million. Superannuation for MPs
who enter the Parliament after 2004 would increase from nine per cent to 15 per cent, in line with federal arrangements. In exchange for the changes,
MPs would lose some allowances, including free parking at the airport and free interstate rail travel. The base salary for a state MP is $137,000

Cost of living goes up every year.If your pay doesn't go up too it's equates to a pay cut.Also low wage workers spend a greater % of their pay so
wages tend to go straight back into the economy.If you need to be told this I believe you may be deliberately ignorant.

Just check out the payroll tax that employers have to pay the government to employ people in Oz, to see how stupid the whole system is.
The minimum wage though does not cover a familys costs and is then supported by government welfare. Our basic wages are low compared to the cost of
living

According to them, they are not 'out of touch' with everyday ordinary Australians! This is no lolling matter! Surely they must have earn't it??
They've been oh so busy lately cleaning up all the messy manufacturing factories!!

Ok, I'm getting the impression that the current government is not, shall we say, highly regarded? The move does seem to go against economic common
sense pace the poster who believes that the economy will be helped by taking money from one end of the pool and putting it in the other end.

Is this opinion of the government fairly widespread? Is there an alternative to Julia (Gillard, I think her name is), or is this a case of "You've
asked for it, now live with it?" And how soon (more Yank ignorance) will she face the voters?

Politicians here couldn't care less about this country or it's population, all they care about is arguing with tv heads, and making them selves look
good on tv.
How is it, that "running" a country requires such a high wage? the country is not a company, so why should its leaders get paid like CEO's?
I met a politician once, who said he gets paid 250K a year to sit in a room full of people, and nod, and occasionally boo the opposing MP's when they
talk.

he even said he wants to milk more, because no one stands up and says "No", as long as people have home and away, the afl, the nrl, cricket and V8
Supercars not 10% of the population could give 2 hoots about any of the afforementioned.

Originally posted by charles1952
Ok, I'm getting the impression that the current government is not, shall we say, highly regarded? The move does seem to go against economic common
sense pace the poster who believes that the economy will be helped by taking money from one end of the pool and putting it in the other end.

Is this opinion of the government fairly widespread? Is there an alternative to Julia (Gillard, I think her name is), or is this a case of "You've
asked for it, now live with it?" And how soon (more Yank ignorance) will she face the voters?

to answer your first question last, she faces the voters in september.

And as of today her approval rating is 35% and tony abbot (leader of the opposition) is at 42%

so far this year she has lost 5 of her cabinet (coalition government) and pretty soon she may be facing court herself over allegations of theft from
union bank accounts back when she was a union lawyer.

As a Person Who is on a D.S.P. (Disability "Support" Pension) I have to agree with everyone I get a Measley $810 A FORNIGHT In Australia
everything is 60 to 90% more expensive then in America take it into account:

You Americans Complain that Gas (we call it PETROL) is around $3.65 a Gallon A which is 3.84 liters try living in Australia where "Gas" is aound $2.50
A LITER!! YEP YOU HEARD RIGHT 1 liter

so for 4 liters (roughly a gallon) of "GAS" in Australia it is $10.00 WHO IS BEING RIPPED OFF HERE!

HEY, I think you Americans should count yourselves lucky!

Look how much WE pay for food and other stuff (and woolworths is cheaper then coles)

I think you will find a majority of people didn't want either Julia or Tony. It is resulted in crazy times where both leaders had to try and win
favour of some independents to get voted in which made them very famous for a while. Someone else here might be able to tell you more about it but
that's the basics of what happened.

Maybe I just have a romantic fantasy about Australians, but I thought you guys were tough, independent, not particularly interested in rules or
controls, and definitely in favor of a good time when the day was over. Am I just buying propaganda or is that how Australians really are? I'd like
to think that there is still a country like that.

But if my image of Australians is halfway accurate, and remember I'm not picking a fight, just friendly curiosity, how did you guys end up with a
government like yours? I keep hearing that the secret wish of the government is for the UN to run the show, and have China in charge of the Chamber
of Commerce.

Again, I'm speaking from parochial ignorance, so laugh all you'd like, I deserve it. But how else am I going to learn? Am I going to want to live
there in ten years?

I'm sorry to say BUT!!!
BUT the inflation in Australia is INCREDIBLE!!!!!
I mean we don't want to be like America with a massive wealth gap, I've lived in China for 6 years and thank Christ I'm a citizen of Australia.
If people think "ohhh it's not fair" Well at least these people HAVE JOBS and are contributing to the economy.
If the minimum wage is not increased it would be cheaper to live off unemployment benefits leeching from the system instead of working.!

In general, we are an extremely relaxed country in a lot of regards. There's a saying over here of "she'll be right mate" and that is kinda how
we are. There are a lot of us that do stand up for our rights and heaps of people really cannot stand the way the country has gone - especially in
the last few years.

We have it extremely good over here - on my travels, I have seen some very poor people who getting clean water is a luxury. So, when I see people
over here complaining about not finding work etc, I don't think that is really how things are. There are a lot of places with high unemployment for
sure, but there are a lot of jobs out there - alas a majority of people would rather be on the dole (welfare) and just sit at home. I know this very
well because my work is right next to a centrelink (welfare dept) and I have heard people out the front talking about it.

Anyway, I digress...

I for one can't stand Gillard and i'm certainly not alone on this one. She said many times, "there will be no carbon tax under the labor govt"
and boom, once she gets in..."oh about that carbon tax...TADA".

Sigh...

Australia is an absolutely beautiful place to live, there are just some knobs that ruin certain aspects of it for us sadly.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.