"homosexuality is not a right".
There is a good argument for this. Nowhere is it specifically enumerated in the constitution that I know of. But than again...neither is heterosexual sex. What is your point, Pat?

"Its rise almost always is accompanied....with a decay of society and...)". Hm. I didnt know that homosexuality could "rise". I thought the statistical percentage of homosexuals to heterosexuals are somewhat constant. Sort of like being left handed. They have always been there. Perhaps you are more aware of them, but that doesnt mean they are on a "rise". So once again Pat, what is your point?

Ah yes, the wretched Weimar republic. When Germany wasn't bullying other countries, exterminating Jews or fragmented. What a horrible time that was. Wouldn't you rather have any of the above than filmmakers and nightclubs indulging in a bit of morose hedonism?

I've heard fundies toss the phrase "Just like the Weimar Republic" around before to sound historical, but I have yet to hear any of them explain how post WW1 Germany led directly to Nazi Germany. A charismatic douchebag took the country by force in a coup de'tat , that's the exact opposite of a logical conclusion, it's like saying that getting run over by a drunk driver is the most logical outcome of me going outside.

@Checkmate, thank you for correcting me, I'm a bio nerd not a history nerd. Still my point stands, Weimar Republic is a popular fundie buzzword, but there's no reason to think it was a clear step on the way to Nazism

Coming from a guy who probably doesn't recognize the peoples' right to freedom of religion both in choice and practice, not to mention the need for a citation to his claim about the Weimar Republic. Away with this windbag.

Cinder block? I think you meant cornerstone. Talk about just phoning it in, you've obviously lost your edge. No wonder you're wandering the wilderness, praying to your racist jesus for a guest spot on fox.