All 3 are pretty boring, but Radiohead is the only one i like, atleast they made some good albums(bends, computer and kid A). But thire last ones have not been much to jump and shout about. Sigur ros is one of the dullest bands i ever heard, havent been abel to listen to a whole album so far i yust falls alseep, and björk i dont realy know, the stuff i have heard havent clicked with me realy.

Honestly I think Creep is their worst song. In fact all of Pablo Honey is just garbage but they made it in the days when they were trying to sell out and make MTV friendly hits thus the poor quality of the music. It's so pathetic how there are still people that only respect them for that one overplayed song. I'd be glad if they never played it again. Otherwise they're total geniuses.

radio head gets my vote here because i've never managed to listen to sigur from start to finish even if i got several albums, the same with bjork

I know exactly what you mean. I don't really care if an artist is trying to market him- or herself as "creative" or "original" or "avant-garde". To me, it just sounds bizarre and and unpleasant.

Sigur Ros is much more orthodox and orderly, but, to my ear, it lacks drive, saturation and structure. I'd expect music to be a lot more than a sequence of nice sounds.

I am not a great admirer of Radiohead either. I can't quite come to terms with Thom Yorke's manner of singing. But, out of the three acts listed in this poll Radiohead is probably the only band, whose place in the prog hall of fame couldn't be contested.

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot create polls in this forumYou cannot vote in polls in this forum