tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post2002523367671645855..comments2013-12-27T11:46:33.018-08:00Comments on Google Operating System: Search Engine Comparison Poll: The ResultsAlex Chituhttps://plus.google.com/115880905881518206826noreply@blogger.comBlogger28125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-24476987407659732282010-12-22T01:47:07.105-08:002010-12-22T01:47:07.105-08:00Each search engine may have their own syntax pecul...Each search engine may have their own syntax peculiarities which searchers adjust to in order to retrieve best results.Malaysia vs Indonesiahttp://www.freeznow.com/2010/12/malaysia-vs-indonesia-live-stream-free.htmlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-26058463052421292742010-12-14T03:03:06.108-08:002010-12-14T03:03:06.108-08:00The recent poll has totally changed results now.
G...The recent poll has totally changed results now.<br />Google is now at number first because 85% searches have been done through Google and remaining 15% by from other search engines. In my opinion other search engines cannot compete with Google as it can also crawl on the comments and every single text of the webpageWholesalehttp://www.wholesalepages.co.uknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-59531411432339672782009-06-18T06:18:10.012-07:002009-06-18T06:18:10.012-07:00I think BING is a great Search EngineI think BING is a great Search EngineBINGhttp://seoflexmedia.com/html/how_do_i_add_my_site_to_bing.htmlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-18300535030842507932009-06-13T02:31:38.740-07:002009-06-13T02:31:38.740-07:00How do you restore the google Search Engine functi...How do you restore the google Search Engine functions after it was affected by a virus ?<br />I want to know how the google Search Engine can be restored to normal when a spyware and/or other viruses affected the system. I have been downloading some anti-spyware programs, such as Spybot, to reverse the effects and I want to know what applications I can used to turn the search engine back to normal. I have my Yahoo Search Engine results mixed with different web addresses. Thanks.mariahttp://www.resveratrol-ultra.wetpaint.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-13968161439925984542008-08-26T22:35:00.000-07:002008-08-26T22:35:00.000-07:00I think everyone's making a big deal out of nothin...I think everyone's making a big deal out of nothing, just be glad we have search engines today, although this is all coming from a kid, who has little knowledge about life, but wants to learn more.<BR/><BR/>(3,2,3) couple, Windows late 2009 or near January 2010, 4 - 6115Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-42329438090661875472008-08-26T22:11:00.000-07:002008-08-26T22:11:00.000-07:00What's the point of comparing the top 3 search eng...What's the point of comparing the top 3 search engines, let alone any search engine in general, as long as i get what i want from the search engine, i'm happy, Google or a RSS Search Engine.<BR/><BR/>I'm 16, a public high school student, and live in a infamous county of Los Angeles, get the picture.Sammyspace.com/xxxbornxballerxxxnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-66059183318544072292007-11-13T13:32:00.000-08:002007-11-13T13:32:00.000-08:00This is not a big surprise. But it would be more c...This is not a big surprise. But it would be more challenging to follow the progresses of the many small engines silently growing in the shadow of Google and Yahoo, like for example scones.free.fr/search and www.doubletrust.net, which are experimental but show some interesting new features.<BR/>Hopefully they will lead to something instead of being silently dropped under the majors pressure :/alex o'briannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-63441907519566990782007-11-12T17:29:00.000-08:002007-11-12T17:29:00.000-08:00What Can i do to get steady ranking from this sear...What Can i do to get steady ranking from this search engines (google)?.<BR/>cause my results page just for a week. Please help me..<BR/><BR/>Thanks for your Answer..<BR/>Nando Topcoy<BR/>http://best-results.blogspot.com/Nando Topcoyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02492241502392509341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-39238186727786154432007-10-11T23:47:00.000-07:002007-10-11T23:47:00.000-07:00Irrespective of the search engine you still get a ...Irrespective of the search engine you still get a squillion ebay threads returned. Someone should introduce an ignor ebay button - their rating would skyrocket.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-40637529760336025612007-10-11T23:46:00.000-07:002007-10-11T23:46:00.000-07:00I would second Matt's request. Let the data loose!...I would second Matt's request. Let the data loose!eytanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07127765663849404000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-43371797533077256262007-10-11T20:19:00.000-07:002007-10-11T20:19:00.000-07:00Unscientific results with only 2000 votes isn't th...Unscientific results with only 2000 votes isn't the best sample. I switched to Yahoo from google 5 months ago and now, I never ever need to go to page2 of my search results to find what I am looking at. Mainly because I have adapted to the way Yahoo search works. I'd stick with yahoo search.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-52340883501075517592007-10-11T05:09:00.000-07:002007-10-11T05:09:00.000-07:00I don't see that Google's result is underwhelming,...I don't see that Google's result is underwhelming, or indicates anybody should switch. If a search engine is the best 51 per cent of the time then that should be the search engine you always use, no? (Unless there's proof that Yahoo or Live is better for CERTAIN TYPES of query.)dmhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06878381868315726278noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-9133413408302544252007-10-10T07:08:00.000-07:002007-10-10T07:08:00.000-07:00I get more traffic from goggle but I get better sa...I get more traffic from goggle but I get better sales from Yahoo and MSN. More of my Y and MSN traffic convert. Just my two cents.Charmshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18056306372134612157noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-75441694869877709872007-10-10T03:24:00.000-07:002007-10-10T03:24:00.000-07:00I was expecting Yahoo to be better... interesting ...I was expecting Yahoo to be better... interesting resultscristian mihaihttp://blog.overbridge.ro/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-478906396101352802007-10-10T00:20:00.000-07:002007-10-10T00:20:00.000-07:00Nobody pretended these results have a scientific v...Nobody pretended these results have a scientific value, but how do you explain that those values remained constant after the first 800-900 votes?Ionut Alex Chituhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02618542750965508582noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-67229369417991330702007-10-09T18:47:00.000-07:002007-10-09T18:47:00.000-07:00Sigh. So, a biased sample of users (readers of th...Sigh. So, a biased sample of users (readers of this blog) issues a biased sample of queries (not necessarily representative of actual query traffic). The results are meaningless.S. Jackhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01218985316472654255noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-31095991540063389662007-10-08T18:06:00.000-07:002007-10-08T18:06:00.000-07:00116%? If it's because of multiple choice votes? If...116%? If it's because of multiple choice votes? If so, where they occurred only a fraction of the vote should have been attributed to each choice, either 1/2 or 1/3, depending on the vote being cast on 2 or 3 choices.PhiloHippushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16334922634487987040noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-80745578210593513652007-10-08T18:00:00.000-07:002007-10-08T18:00:00.000-07:00" eddie said... is it just me or are those perc..." eddie said...<BR/><BR/> is it just me or are those percentages messed up?<BR/><BR/> If you add up all those votes, it equals 2356, not 2008. So should these be the percetages:<BR/><BR/> Google: 44%<BR/> Yahoo: 26%<BR/> Live: 30%<BR/><BR/> All those added together now equals 100%."<BR/><BR/> "If you found two or three equally good results, you were allowed to select all of them."Frog29http://www.blogger.com/profile/12030182148118649684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-78330612537026750642007-10-08T16:48:00.000-07:002007-10-08T16:48:00.000-07:00Any chance of making the queries and votes availab...Any chance of making the queries and votes available? I'd be curious to delve into the votes in more detail.Matt Cuttshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13526072281417654587noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-23734452251552232512007-10-08T16:45:00.000-07:002007-10-08T16:45:00.000-07:00is it just me or are those percentages messed up?I...is it just me or are those percentages messed up?<BR/><BR/>If you add up all those votes, it equals 2356, not 2008. So should these be the percetages:<BR/><BR/>Google: 44%<BR/>Yahoo: 26%<BR/>Live: 30%<BR/><BR/>All those added together now equals 100%.eddienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-8439262120381030522007-10-08T16:42:00.000-07:002007-10-08T16:42:00.000-07:00> 51% vs 35% ??> Sounds to me that Google is> 16% ...> 51% vs 35% ??<BR/>> Sounds to me that Google is<BR/>> 16% better than Live. Nothing<BR/>> to sneeze at, I'd say.<BR/><BR/>Actually, by this statistic, it's possible Google may have been better than Live 65% of the time. Because while Yahoo stole the crown 30% of the time, that doesn't mean Google was worse than MSN for those times -- it might be Google ranked second, but above MSN in the cases where Yahoo won. Anyway, the order of the poll was fixed so I think that might have introduced a pro-Live skew.Philipp Lenssenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09340991515644165702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-30527804959798370402007-10-08T15:52:00.000-07:002007-10-08T15:52:00.000-07:0051% vs 35% ??Sounds to me that Google is 16% bette...51% vs 35% ??<BR/>Sounds to me that Google is 16% better than Live. Nothing to sneeze at, I'd say.Guffyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16464183691684713812noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-83544284018667620292007-10-08T15:47:00.000-07:002007-10-08T15:47:00.000-07:00It's funny to see sex as a popular search term on ...It's funny to see sex as a popular search term on google operating systemDouggiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18137509949959734226noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-4318821961870826482007-10-08T15:20:00.000-07:002007-10-08T15:20:00.000-07:00A 51% "success rate" could mean Google is "only" t...A 51% "success rate" could mean Google is "only" the best 51% of the time, or it could mean Google returns exactly the right result for the tastes of 51% of the people, and that the other people prefer other types of results. E.g. maybe a typical Yahoo user is phrasing things differently to return "good Yahoo results" -- each search engine may have their own syntax peculiarities which searchers adjust to in order to retrieve best results.Philipp Lenssenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09340991515644165702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-68769443881814803182007-10-08T15:06:00.000-07:002007-10-08T15:06:00.000-07:00Not surprising except Yahoo is lower in rankings t...Not surprising except Yahoo is lower in rankings than LIVE. Yahoo is much better in my opinion.Pankajhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13441379038952138044noreply@blogger.com