Results of an international survey of practice patterns for establishing prognosis in neck pain: the ICON project

View/Open

Permanent link

Metadata

Abstract

Results of an international survey of health care providers for neck pain are reported. The survey specifically collected self-reported practice patterns for establishing a prognosis in neck pain. Over 440 responses from 27 countries were collected. Descriptive results indicate that respondents assigned large prognostic impact to factors including mechanism of injury and psychological or behavioral constructs. Range of motion, age and sex were routinely collected despite relatively moderate impact on prognosis. A comparison between chiropractic and manual/physical therapy groups showed differences in practice patterns that were unlikely to affect prognostic accuracy. The results suggest a gap exists between current best-evidence and actual practice when the goal is to establish a prognosis in neck pain.

Keywords

Pain; Prognosis; Outcomes survey; Neck

Date

October 21, 2013

Source

Open Orthopaedics, vol.7(Suppl 4: M2), pp.387 - 395 (8)

Item Type

Journal Article

Publisher

Bentham Open

DOI

Rights Statement

For authors of Bentham Open there is no restriction to authors for self-archiving of pre-refereeing preprints nor refereed postprints. The same applies for all authors who opt to publish their articles as open access for Bentham Science Publishers journals, in which case the publisher's version/PDF of the published article can be used for self-archiving.