If Willie had been born in the 1980s instead of in 1901, he would have been a cybercriminal looking to steal data. Why? Because that's where the money is.

Intellectual property, trade secrets, sensitive customer information, user credentials, patient information -- all of these are forms of data that are as valuable as money in the bank. And the risks associated with losing or failing to protect that data are far greater than those associated with cash. And just like cash, data is at risk when it's at rest, in motion, or in use.

Here are some tips for approaching data protection with the three states as a guide.

Data At RestData is at rest when it is not being accessed, such as when it is stored on a physical or logical medium. Examples include files sitting on a flash drive or on archived magnetic tapes in the corporate warehouse.

Despite recent sensational headlines, encryption still works well to protect data at rest. Encryption applications, such as full disk encryption, provide very strong data protection when coupled with strong random number generation, the right encryption algorithms with robust keys, and intelligent acceleration, such as Intel Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions (Intel AES-NI) to make the encryption unobtrusive to the user.

Application owners and IT administrators are often concerned about an "encryption tax" -- a lag in application performance caused by CPU cycles consumed in complex cryptographic processing. If that performance tax is too great, user productivity and application efficiency suffers, making encryption an unattractive option. With intelligent acceleration of some cryptographic operations, this tax can be dramatically decreased so that encryption can be more widely deployed.

Data In MotionData is in motion when it is moving between applications, traversing a network, or moving between networks.

Data in motion can be protected by protocols, such as TLS, SSL, and IPsec, which encrypt data packets for secure transportation and decryption by intended parties. Like a really thick security envelope for an important letter, these protocols provide a wrapper that helps prevent unauthorized access to your data as it's in motion. Use of Intel instruction enhancements, such as Intel AES-NI and Intel Advanced Vector Extensions (Intel AVX), can help these protocols be more efficient, which can, in turn, help your data centers run more cost effectively. You can and should complement these protocols with data loss prevention software or appliances that monitor network traffic to help prevent unauthorized transmission of sensitive data.

Data In UseData is in use when it is being actively read or written by an application, and this is its most vulnerable state. When in use, data sheds its protective layers so it can be used and changed.

When living in an apartment building with other tenants, your apartment and its contents are secure only if the building manager keeps unauthorized people out and if the windows and doors are secure. If someone leaves a door or window unlocked (as with an application vulnerability), or if the building manager hires a cleaning crew who are actually crooks (like malware that's injected into a system service DLL), then you might as well leave your apartment door unlocked. Data in use can be just as unprotected and just as exposed to risk.

You can establish an environment in which only trusted applications can access your data. This trusted execution environment is like a safe inside your apartment, to which you have the only key. In addition, like checking your apartment for items out of place or missing, a trusted execution environment can be measured and known to be secure, such as with Intel Trusted Execution Technology (Intel TXT), so you can be confident that your data is protected even when in use.

Which Data Should You Protect?You now have more freedom to answer this question because of the rapid pace of technological innovation. One important innovation is the acceleration of encryption technologies.

The performance hit associated with encryption used to be so high that enterprises sometimes did not encrypt data that needed protection. However, today's encryption acceleration technologies let you base data-protection decisions on risk assessment rather than fears about performance because accelerated encryption essentially removes encryption overhead from the equation. This means you can deploy encryption where it's needed -- up to and including encrypting all of your data.

While this greater freedom is a boon to data protection, your organization still must define policies that place data on a sensitivity continuum from highly restricted to public data. Then you can enforce those policies with processes and tools. This is an important topic that I'll address in a future post.

Data Protection Starts With EncryptionThe days when you might protect your data by locking up paperwork in a filing cabinet are long gone. That's because our connected business depends on keeping data both safe and available to business partners. Encryption remains a valuable data-protection tool. When you apply it systematically to data throughout its life cycle, you'll be on a path to foiling our modern-day Willie Suttons.

* Thanks to Wikipedia, which also reports that this exchange is probably apocryphal. Oh, well. It still makes a good story.

Thanks for an article that reflects what I have preached for a while - encryption coupled with two-factor authentication, such as user credentials coupled with a trusted device - results in a lock that foils all but the most determined hacker.

Much like my grandfather telling me that "locks keep honest poeople honest" our security feature cannot keep out the very determined hackers, but they can make it so hard to access that these determinied hacckers go after easier prey.

Superb!! the essay touches on the concept of the Trusted Environment,-- i.e. knowing that you have correct copies of the proper programs -- and nothing else. This needs to start at POST as Security is like a balloon: a pin-prick -- and POP! Gone.

security has to win by a complete shut-out

I shall look forward to additional comments supporting this excellent lead by Tom Quillin.

Great encryption points! While I get point about encryption for data-in-motion and data-at-rest, you miss that one can also use encryption to secure data in use. Wikipedia has a nice page describing data-in-use security - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D... .

Published: 2015-03-03Off-by-one error in the ecryptfs_decode_from_filename function in fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c in the eCryptfs subsystem in the Linux kernel before 3.18.2 allows local users to cause a denial of service (buffer overflow and system crash) or possibly gain privileges via a crafted filename.

Published: 2015-03-03** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue in customer-controlled software. Notes: none.

How can security professionals better engage with their peers, both in person and online? In this Dark Reading Radio show, we will talk to leaders at some of the security industry’s professional organizations about how security pros can get more involved – with their colleagues in the same industry, with their peers in other industries, and with the IT security community as a whole.