I've been experimenting with some pictures of icicles after our recent winter storms, and was wondering if anyone had any tips/examples for making these types of photos more interesting? There is a bush near my house covered with icicles that make for interesting patterns, but I'm finding that most of my shots are turning out rather bland and gray. I've worked in post-processing a bit in lightroom to increase the contrast, but still don't feel that the pics really stand out. I've attached one example that I've edited.

This was shot at ISO 400, f/5.6, 1/125, with a Nikon D5100 and f/1.8 prime lens.

Agree this picture probably doesn't do justice to what you noticed and inspired by when you stepped outside and saw this bush covered in ice.

Couple of tips to make them more interesting :- wait for nice light, so the ice starts to "sparkle"- Use a larger aperture to make it stand out more from the background- find a pleasing composition of the lines formed by the branches (now it's a bit of a hodgepodge)- maybe get a bit closer and focus on some details (can help to avoid clutter)

If that's not an option, get much closer and isolate the aspect of the ice that caught your eye on the first place. You won't get that sparkly movement in a still image very easily. Ice looks unique and special up close.

I agree with Peter about the downsides. To sort of quote Kelly Cordes, "Ice is stupid, cold, and scary. But, if you keep warm, is it's all puppies and rainbows."

I'm interested in seeing your next efforts Timothy. I would also suggest that you go out of your way to find interesting and unusual ice formations. The variety of forms that ice can take never ceases to amaze me. I've been climbing the stuff for six years now and I keep getting surprised. A couple weeks ago I found what could only be described as an "ice fern", very cool.