Menu

reactor

Fukushima 3/11 Truth was very recently told by critics that “there’s no proof of Israel’s connection to what happened at Fukushima,” and that “it’s hard to believe that Israel is involved.”

For those critics and anyone who is occupied with spreading disinformation and fake radiation charts, let us summarize some of the facts.

Magna BSP (Rotem Industrial Park D.N Arava 86800 Israel, tel: +972-8-6552668, e-mail: magnabsp@magnabsp.com), an Israeli security company founded in January of 2001 according to Bloomberg (although their website was only created in 2007 and their Youtube channel on November 24, 2011), had set up the security system at the Fukushima facility a year before the nuclear attacks happened. This has been confirmed even by the Israeli news paper Haaretz on March 18, 2011. Also the Jerusalem Post has partially described what Magna BSP’s official task at Fukushima is about.

Also by Haaretz, on April 28, 2010: “Maayan Ventures says one of the startups in its technology incubator in Dimona, Magna B.S.P., has received its first order for a radar system to protect nuclear reactors, from Japan. The order is worth hundreds of thousands of shekels, Maayan Ventures says, without being more specific.”

According to the Israeli Rotem Industries Ltd“Magna B. S. P. Ltd. is a co-project of the entrepreneur Haim Sibony and the Dimona Technological Incubator under the auspices of, and partly financed by, The Office of the Chief Scientist of the Israeli Ministry of Industry and Trade (OCS). Aeronautics Defense Systems Ltd. and “angel” investors invested in the company.”

“Magna is a Security Systems company, dealing with the development, manufacturing and marketing of a unique passive electro-optic radar system. Magna’s products are optimal for use in perimeter security protection in a very large number of civilian and military targets such as airports and airfields, seaports, borders, security sensitive and high risk facilities like banks, correctional facilities, power stations, refineries, petrochemical and other industries, governmental agencies buildings, military, navy and air force bases, and more.”

“Magna’s management team is composed of Haim Sibony (CEO), Joseph Ran (Chairman of the Board), Levy Zruya (R&D Manager) and Hagai Ortner-General Manager of the ATC Technological Incubator, all with many years of experience in top executive positions. In addition to Haim Sybony and Levy Zruya, in the R&D Team work 6 engineers and academicians and 2 technicians. All team members have proven high professional skills and vast experience in all relevant technologies and software.”

“Units of the Static-Staring System have been successfully tested by the IDF (green and air force), the Israel Airports Authority (Ben-Gurion Airport), the Ashdod Harbor, and in USA and Spain.

Magna BSP: “The technology is patent saved and well known in sensitive sites as nuclear plans, airports, borders etc., around the world and can integrate with other systems.”

“Magna BSP had a full time internet linked two way connection to the Fukushima reactor room(s) all the way through the disaster. They told TEPCO about that connection on March 15 [2011] (after everything blew sky high) via a [Jerusalem Post] article. Why did Manga BSP wait until everything was blown sky high to tell Tepco the data link existed? … Hard to believe that TEPCO would not have been interested in viewing a reactor that was about to explode. It seems impossible that TEPCO would not have wanted to view the reactor, and probably did not ask because the link was kept a secret. It is a simple fact that internet connections are never allowed inside a reactor’s containment. The connection was mentioned in the Jerusalem Post AFTER the destruction was finalized.

… [Shortly after Magna BSP arrived] Stuxnet appeared in Japan (June 2010). Stuxnet has two modes, random and administrative. It can be administered to optimize the damage and can also transmit setup information and industrial system information to a remote computer. Once installed on the host system via a flash drive it causes that system to violate it’s normal security protocols and internet administration becomes possible if a connection exists. Tampering is not visible on the control room readouts, because Stuxnet learns what “normal” looks like and keeps the temperature, pressure, and other readouts within normal limits so that the operators are oblivious to the destruction happening in secret. … Remote administration mode can be adjusted on demand to suit any need. No doubt the people at Fukushima sat there in idle mode thinking all was well until something screamed or went boom and at that point it would be too late to do anything other than cry.

… Magna BSP had access to the reactors at this facility. They were based in Dimona, which is a military base that manufactures nuclear weapons. Stuxnet was made in their yard. They are stated to be a military company. There is extremely strong evidence that Dimona based Magna BSP placed nuclear weapons at the exploded or vanished reactors at Fukushima, possibly hidden inside one of their unbelievably GIANT stereoscopic cameras. These cameras were installed inside the reactor containment of Fukushima reactor 3 under the cover of a security contract in the year prior to the disaster. These cameras [weighed over 1,000 pounds] [and] are identical in size and appearance to a gun type nuclear weapon. Since previous hydrogen explosions at boiling water reactors have never caused any sort of damage to equipment or buildings, even during complete meltdowns, it begs the question how on earth one at reactor 3 produced a mushroom cloud. Three Mile Island sits in the evidence pool against what we have been told about Fukushima. History does matter.

One problem with the reporting in the mainstream media is that it failed to convey just how massive and strong the containment structures really were, as seen in this classified photo. A hydrogen explosion would only blow the sheet metal off the steel framed roof if it even did that, at Three Mile Island the hydrogen ignition did nothing at all. It just scared employees. Another thing the reporting failed to convey is the gravity of the disaster. Compare the containment diagram to the remains of reactor 3. It is painfully obvious that many tons of highly radioactive plutonium in the containment pools is nowhere to be found, the entire floor they were on is completly gone. We are getting lied to.

… The reason Magna BSP gave for the odd shape, enormous weight, and giant proportions of their cameras was that they were stereoscopic. A stereoscopic camera could be plausible at an airstrip, where the camera would need depth perception out miles, but not indoors where focal lengths are short. Depth perception going out miles could also be accomplished with two separately mounted cameras weighing only a few pounds; the giant thousand pounder is a dead giveaway. Why this giant thing, when smaller nukes are possible? Nuclear weapons always produce a certain amount of heat, and if a small design was used it would be obvious the “camera” was warm, even when turned off and sitting on the shelf. This would cause questions to be asked, especially in a nuclear power facility. The enormous size and weight helped conceal the decay heat.” – Jim Stone

Of course, the question remains now WHY Israel is involved in the Fukushima attacks.

This can, for now, be anything from Japan offering Iran to enrich their uranium [1, 2] to Japan siding with Palestine [1, 2], which Japan apparently continues to do even after the Fukushima attacks. This could be the reason why the Stuxnet virus was reactivated.

The reason why Japan and the rest of the world are currently facing nuclear threats is not because of the existence of nuclear power plants. Nuclear power plants such as those at Fukushima are designed following the highest-standard safety measures that exceed the requirements multiple times and will only pose a threat to the people’s health when they are attacked and blown up intentionally, which was exactly what happened on March 12-15, 2011.

In fact, the process of generating nuclear power can be harnessed in such a way that no nuclear “waste” would ever remain unused. It is the purposely silencing of this scientific knowledge that has created the unnecessary pile of nuclear waste, which in reality is not waste at all. It sits there begging to be used, for only a mere 5% of its full capacity has been used.

Aside from explaining how nuclear “waste” was initially meant to be reused up to 20 times until no nuclear waste is left at all, the following report mainly focuses on the nuclear status in the USA but, in general, most of the information can be projected on the global nuclear community. It is an essential report that certainly belongs in the 3/11 files because it explains why Japan and the world are stuck with this huge pile of useful nuclear resources that could benefit the entire world when it was used instead of stored away.

Americans have been told their nuclear waste must go somewhere. Americans have been told their spent reactor fuel needs to be stored inside a mountain in the desert, where it will sit as a threat and menace to the world for millions of years. Americans have been told there is nothing they can do about it. But what if they have been told a lie? What if that “spent fuel” was not spent at all? What if a technology existed which allowed the same fuel to be used over and over, twenty times in fact, and expended so fully that fuel rods would be safe enough to handle directly out of the reactor? Think any “spent fuel pools” would be full? And even if this technology never existed,

What if foreign nations, (France was one) offered to buy this fuel from America for billions of dollars only to have the American Government refuse the offer for no reason at all? Certainly allowing France to have it would solve the problem of getting rid of it. And the final question, WHY would the American Government want so much nuclear material sitting around the country – enough to make countless atomic bombs – only to have it become a threat to America’s national security? Could it be that for many years America has not had a legitimate government, and instead has had a band of invaders in power who have intentionally set America up for a fall? After reading this report, I believe you will be inclined to think so.

This report consists of hard scientific fact and even harder answers.

During my journey of discovery in my investigation into the Fukushima disaster, I interviewed an 85 year old nuclear engineer who worked in the nuclear industry during America’s glory days, an engineer who earned GE over 100 patents. He was one of the engineers who designed Fukushima, so naturally when conducting an investigation into such a disaster a journalist would want that type of reference. He was surprised when my prior study of reactor systems was so thorough that he had no information about Fukushima I did not already dig up, and he was very surprised when I told him details about the inner workings of his own reactor design he never expected anyone in the media to know.

When I started to think I was going to walk away with nothing new, he began to talk about an entirely different subject. He began his new direction in the discussion with the phrase “My team succeeded in closing the nuclear loop, and Carter banned our miracle with an executive order

Here is what followed that introductory line, and an enormous reason why Americans need to seriously question the current government structure and possibly start over.

“I started in the American nuclear program all the way back at the time of the Manhattan project, and have been involved in reactor design and nuclear engineering my whole life. There was one answer we all searched for, and it was how to close the nuclear loop.

When a reactor such as a boiling water reactor uses fuel, the waste products, which are highly radioactive isotopes that have a different fission characteristic than the original fuel, build up in the fuel and change the nature of the nuclear reaction. A reactor such as a boiling water reactor can only use the fuel until it gets contaminated by these isotopes enough to change the nature of the nuclear reactions taking place. The reaction environment inside a boiling water reactor is only one such environment which will work to trigger a chain reaction, and if that spent fuel is put into a reactor made from different materials, those materials can favor the burning of the isotopes which interfere with the chain reactions in the boiling water reactor and use these interfering isotopes as fuel until they are consumed. After this process, which restores the fuel to it’s original state is complete, the fuel can go back into the boiling water reactor and used as new with no reprocessing – the exact same rods can be exchanged between reactors.

We perfected the second reactor design which used liquid sodium as a coolant and the reactor ran much hotter – 1100 farenheit as opposed to 550 in a boiling water reactor. The liquid sodium circulated inside the reactor instead of water, with the heat of the reaction being removed from the system by a heat exchanger which produced steam outside the reactor for use in producing electricity. The temperature difference and coolant characteristics in the complimentary reactor facilitated the burning of the isotopes, and you got to use both sides of the reaction – the boiling water reactor produced electricity while producing unwanted isotopes, and the sodium cooled reactor produced electricity while burning the unwanted isotopes out. This process could be repeated 20 times, and when it was finished the fuel was DEAD and no longer hazardous because all of it’s radiological potential was used up. It was a clean energy dream come true, and Carter banned it by executive order!”

He specifically stated that the burn down was so complete that the spent fuel was safe to handle directly with bare hands, and needed no special care or maintenance at all, and after I questioned him about exactly how safe, said you could safely sleep on it. I questioned him several times, saying he must be exaggerating, but he said ALL radiological potential was used, and the fuel was completely inert at the end of the final cycle.

Many people know about the liquid sodium breeder reactor developed by General Electric in the late 1970’s but few people know the real story about this reactor, which this engineer developed. To back stab the public image of this reactor, it was stated that it’s rods would stick and that liquid sodium was too dangerous to use as a coolant. But this engineer, the man who developed it, stated that this media campaign was a pure psy op which like many things the media and government says had no truth to it at all.

He then went on to lament about what a waste of money it was to have the technology banned because nuclear fuel is expensive and they were only able to use it to about five percent of its total potential without implementing this technology. He lamented the fact that his life’s greatest accomplishment got banned for no good reason, and it was a tremendous waste of money to not use the technology his team developed. Electricity would have been cheap. So cheap that homes would not have been heated with oil or natural gas, electricity would have been the only sensible choice. Furthermore, with a reduction in the price of electricity by at least 10X, electric cars would have quickly become a standard.

This would have been America’s free energy future, with the only real cost being maintenance of infrastructure.

He was sad that we were now paying too much for electricity. I guess that’s how an engineer thinks. He had read my article about Fukushima and liked it, so it is an easy guess that his eyes were open to the global conspiracy. But I think he missed the obvious in what he said.

Here is what I think about this technology being banned, and it has nothing to do with preservation of resources or free energy.

Nuclear reactors are huge. They have an enormous amount of nuclear material in them. One boiling water reactor core the size of the ones at Fukushima, which have a thermal potential of three gigawatts and an electrical generating capacity of one gigawatt can easily hold enough fissionable material to make many atomic bombs. And with the technology that makes re-using that fuel illegal, it builds up in the cooling pools at a rate of 25 tons per electrical gigawatt YEAR. This means that after 40 years of fuel buildup even small 500 megawatt facilities have approximately a million pounds of highly radioactive fuel sitting in their pools waiting for the right combination of problems to cause a disaster.

Because the Japanese were at least allowed by their government to use a reprocessing technology inferior to what this engineer spoke of, Fukushima only had approximately 250,000 pounds of “spent” fuel at each reactor site, which remained intact throughout the disaster. But because in America no reprocessing is allowed at all in any form, the Fukushima equivalents in America, such as TVA operated Browns Ferry and NSP operated Prairie Island have no fewer than two million pounds of “spent” fuel at each reactor site, which means that Browns Ferry alone could, in a worst case scenario, far exceed the damage done by Fukushima.

Contrary to what the scamming mainstream press has reported, Fukushima reactor 3 was destroyed entirely while at 3,000 PSI (far beyond specifications) which resulted in a complete core expulsion. This threw approximately 100,000 pounds of fuel into the environment, much of it in the form of brown dust that badly contaminated the entire surrounding area and was found around the world. Seldom reported in the press is the fact that the Fukushima site was so badly contaminated that it could not be approached, and remote control and robots were used in the months following the disaster to get the radiation down to a survivable level after the first three people to explore the site died. At 100,000 pounds of expelled material, reactor 3 could have produced at most 2 percent of the total contamination possible from a large American nuclear facility. This puts the possible disaster from Browns ferry at 50 to 100 times worse than Fukushima. Multiply that by Prairie Island and the over 100 other similar sized nuclear facilities in America and it is not hard to calculate that a serious national security threat exists.

America’s nuclear waste problem was intentionally created

When GE and others designed the nuclear facilities both in America and abroad, they had calculated that they would indeed succeed in closing the nuclear loop. So they designed the nuclear facilities with an approximate 20X safety margin in the fuel pools, because they did not have a clear date on when the technology would be perfected. It was my impression from this engineer that they got it sooner than expected. So fortunately the fuel pools were over built, but despite being over built they were never designed to withstand the fuel burdens that would result from a political decision to destroy the closed loop fuel cycle technology altogether.

So now, 40 years after the ban, America has fuel pools around the country that are so full that they have exceeded even the extremely generous safety margins they were originally designed to have, and even modest pools often have over 400 tons of highly active isotope ridden “spent” fuel in them.

Having functional fuel pool cooling systems was never intended to be necessary. GE and others wanted only a fractional core of fuel sitting in a pool at any one time, with at most one or two entire cores, not 15 or 20. If all cooling systems failed with only the intended maximum of one or two cores sitting in a pool there would be no boiling of the water in the pool, no pending disaster possible from equipment failure no matter how severe. But the way it is now, if there is any sort of attack or disaster which prevents fuel pool maintenance at any of the facilities in America for a period exceeding three days, the water will boil off, the fuel will catch fire and a nuclear disaster of unimaginable magnitude far in excess of Fukushima will take place. And it never needed to be this way, in fact, the situation is criminal.

Foreign nations offered help, but the American government said NO

Upon recognizing the lunacy of America’s Federally mandated nuclear sabotage, countries like France and Germany offered to buy America’s 5% spent fuel for billions of dollars. They were not held political hostage by a hostile government, and could certainly use a source of cheap fuel. But rather than accept this offer,the American government mandated NO transport of the fuel to foreign nations, no further use whatsoever. American nuclear facilities were forced by Federal regulation to use approximately 5 percent of the fuel’s radiological potential, leaving 95 percent of the radiological hazard remaining, and subsequently forced to keep it in a fuel pool that needs continuous maintenance. While arguing against this report, shills have said it was the import/export restrictions which caused such a dangerous situation in America, but since those laws were written by the same government that banned the closing of the “nuclear loop”, the export restrictions are only a further indictment of the FED for causing this problem.

Simultaneous with the intentional building of the threat from having so much nuclear material sitting around came all the government scandals and lies about needing to put the fuel somewhere. Inside a mountain in the desert. Inside a dry cask. Maybe in the ocean, all the while the general American public was kept oblivious to the obvious answer: If they were not allowed to use it because of a nonsensical piece of legislation, why not let someone else have it, when other nations are willing to even pay for it?

Here is what I believe is the answer. And this answer needs to be spread far and wide.

Whatever you think of Kennedy, on the day of his death he was America’s last hope. No President since has been anything other than a puppet for an enemy infiltrator, The enemy is not only inside the gates, it has been taking a paycheck from the American people for over 45 years.

Consider this: America’s government intentionally put in place policies that de-industrialized America. That’s an act of war. The American government put in place policies that intentionally destroyed America’s schools. That’s an act of war. And I consider forcing via mandate the buildup of hundreds of thousands, if not millions of nuclear warheads worth of perfectly good reactor fuel just waiting for a disaster to be an act of war as well – Only an enemy would intentionally mandate the creation of such a threat, who on earth would, other than someone who hated America? Not only did America lose a marvelous clean virtually free energy future, that future got converted into a threat that could very easily destroy the nation and take much of the world with it. All it would take to kill America, with America’s nuclear facilities drastically overloaded with 5% spent fuel, is 150 smart bombs. One successful bombing run and it is over. And that’s not even taking into consideration other disaster scenarios, such as earthquakes and computer virus attacks.

The enemy of America is now in complete control of the nation

Ever since Kennedy’s assassination America has not had a true representative government, especially starting with Carter. When I worked for the NSA, I saw a few computers which were identical to the early vote counting computers, and they could be set to loop a single ballot over and over again. With a scammed vote, America got over-run by outsiders who wanted the country destroyed. Prior to 1973 America was only going upward, and anyone who wanted to see America destroyed or enslaved would never permit Americans to get virtually free energy. The enemy would lose oil profits. They would potentially lose control of energy, leaving the financial system the only means of forced social compliance outside of a hot war and the enemy wanted control options. True clean energy had to be stopped.

The enemy of America is a sinister enemy. It is a small group of religiously “elite” people who weaponize everything. They have weaponized sympathy, victim status, water systems, vaccines, genetically modified organisms and even terror – anything they have been able to think of, and have used these things and many more to cause destruction. And the nuclear industry, now blocked from a dream come true technology, can be used as a weapon.

The truth in this is undeniable

There is plenty of proof. No shill can stop people from checking out the history of other nations, such as Germany, France and Russia offering America BILLIONS for this not so “spent” fuel, which can only sit as a hazard after a political decision banning technologies which allow for it’s purification at the same time additional political decisions have banned it’s export. This hazard has been unnecessarily and intentionally accumulating for years. It’s the equivalent of keeping a 5,000 gallon tank of petrol in your bedroom. Better hope all is well with it.

I honestly feel that banning this miracle technology; you should have heard the sparkle, the awe in the old man’s voice when he said they closed the “nuclear loop”, and the sadness, despair and anger expressed at it’s being banned; I feel it was an act of war against America. There were never any accidents associated with this technology, according to this engineer everything negative said about it was a bold faced lie spoken by people of ill intent. America’s nuclear waste problem is not scientific, it is political.

I believe this nuclear engineer opened up and told me about this because I was the first journalist he ever encountered that actually understood nuclear technology. He knew I would understand what he said and subsequently bring this story to the public. But outside of making the public aware by telling his story in an article such as this, what more can I do?

The executive order was number 12058, and it put in place the Nuclear non-proliferation act of 1978.

There was NEVER a safety related issue with the technology, and never a meltdown of any sort associated with it. This fits the context in which the engineer spoke. This confirms that a “wag the dog” scenario really was put forth to the public to avoid dissent toward the banning of this miracle technology, a wag the dog the shills repeat OVER AND OVER. It’s a lie folks, and I will prove it right here!

The excuse given in the “act” associated with the executive order was that the process was perfect for producing plutonium, and the FED wanted to avoid the possibility of plutonium spreading around the world for use in nuclear weapons. No mention as to its safety is made at all in the bill, which would be expected if it was a legitimate excuse to shoot the technology down.

There is a major flaw in the concept of non proliferation. First of all, the technology had already been developed, and was the sole property of an American corporation. So using this technology in America, which already had LOTS AND LOTS of plutonium, would not have been any more of a threat than what was already here. So the excuse for banning the technology was a LIE.

Reagan later over turned this executive order, but then an excuse was made that we really could not do it after all, it was EXPENSIVE!. I am going to flatly state that the technology got buried or destroyed in the 10 year interim where it was out in limbo, and the ban was lifted only after EVERY LAST TRACE of how it should be done was physically destroyed, and every last document associated with it was shredded. After that, the only thing needed to keep it quiet would be the usurpation of GE, and transfer of the engineers involved so they never get to re-develop it.

Other nations have developed versions of the technology and are using it right now, but what they have cannot approach the elegance and perfection of what this engineer described. I believe America had the holy grail of nuclear technology, and it really was taken from us. What others have cannot be described as the closing of the “nuclear loop”.

A link to an abbreviated version of that treaty is here and it is a tough one to dig up. Nothing ANYWHERE specifically states the technology was banned, but the implementation of the treaty amounts to a de-facto ban. This is what killed it.

It is interesting then that the reactor engineer specifically stated that Carter made the case that the process was not safe and THAT is what led to the ban. So I would be willing to bet that there was something else going on which remains classified to this day; but as the “official” culprit, this act is what did it. And please note where I had to go to get even an abbreviated version. $! CHINA. They are THAT worried about having screwed us!

Here is Carter’s speech about his enactment of this abomination, where as usual, safety and security are used as an excuse to destroy. I am sure if you found my site you know that game!

Here is a supporting book, I could not dredge up the full text of the actual bill, only an abbreviated version. There is something fishy here. If you find the actual bill with the full text, send me the link and I will put it here.