Chris Grayling heckled in parliamentary debate as he defended Government use of Atos Healthcare

Outgoing
employment minister Chris Grayling was heckled in a parliamentary debate
today as he defended Government use of Atos Healthcare despite on-going
public protest.

Mr
Grayling, who will move to the Justice Department following the coalition’s
cabinet reshuffle, was met with shouts from the public gallery in Westminster
Hall when he spoke in support of the controversial agency.

Chairman
of the session Phillip Holloborne was forced to intervene after protesters in
wheelchairs interrupted the minister’s speech by shouting “shame on you” and
“people’s lives are at stake.”

Mr
Hollborne said: “Parliamentary rules are there is to be no noise at all from
the gallery. This is your last chance. If there is more noise, I will have to
suspend sitting, no one will hear from the minister and I will clear the
gallery.”

After
continued furore, one woman was ejected from the chamber before the speakers
were allowed to resume.

The
90-minute debate was demanded by Labour MP Tom Gratex following widespread
protests over the private company’s disability assessments after their brand
was displayed prominently on London 2012 lanyards as sponsors of the Paralympic
Games.

Responding
to the debate, Mr Grayling said the decision to appoint Atos followed a “long
and difficult process” but rebutted accusations that there was a concerted
attempt within government to reduce the number of people on benefits.

The
newly minted Justice Secretary said: “It is all about trying to help people
back into the workplace if they possibly can be. That was the motivation of the
previous government when they established the work capability assessment.”

“We
will never create a system that is perfect. That is why we have a right to
appeal.”

However,
Mr Gratex claimed there must be radical reforms to Atos’ assessments to make
sure they work properly for claimants and taxpayers.

The
shadow minister added that the taxpayer is effectively paying twice for the
government’s £122 million contract with the firm – once for the assessments and
again to cover the cost of appeals, almost 40% of which are successful.

“There
is a degree of chaos in the system caused by the decisions of government and
the failure to hold Atos to account,” he said.

During
the debate another Labour MP, Katy Clark, said Atos’ sponsorship of the
Paralympics has sparked significant public anger, referring to a protest by
hundreds of disabled people at the company’s headquarters and the Department of
Work and Pensioners.

“Many
people feel it is an insult to people going through this process,” she said.

Controversy
surrounding the disability assessments heightened this week after a leaked DWP
letter revealed that sick and disabled claimants could lose up 70% of their
weekly employment support if they refuse to take part in work-related
activities.

An
Atos spokeswoman said: "We do not make decisions on people's benefit
entitlement or on welfare policy but we will continue to make sure the service
that we provide is as highly professional and compassionate as it can be.”