No one in Congress gives a floor speech like Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas. He's the Must-Watch congressman, as an early summer speech on the farm bill made clear. On Thursday, Gohmert took to the House floor and gave another whirlwind performance, covering all of the House GOP's favorite whipping points.

And, yes, he suggested that if the Obama administration keeps giving out "blinded opaqueness" instead of transparency on the spring's IRS scandal, then Congress may have to defund part of the executive branch.

"Couple of issues that certainly are worth elaborating on today," Gohmert inoffensively began. He kicked off his speech with the reading of a Wall Street Journal editorial on the IRS. "It certainly appears that the IRS was weaponized for the political purpose of one party which would, of course, be one of the worst nightmares for the Founders of this country," Gohmert went on. Although, it should go without saying, that while Gohmert did acknowledge that the Founders weren't so keen on the idea of political parties to begin with, they certainly didn't have any conception of an Internal Revenue Service.

Then Gohmert brought down his ominous hammer:

When one party in power in the executive branch can weaponize its federal agencies against its political opponents, unless it is stopped, this little experiment in democracy will come to an end.

So what is there that Congress can do to help disarm federal agencies?

If the administration is not going to be forthcoming with information about the IRS, then it may be necessary to defund part of the executive branch until such time as they become truthful.

Gohmert particularly seemed to single out the Department of Justice for budgetary vengence, saying it hasn't been forthcoming dating back to at least the Fast and Furious gun-running scandal.

After this, Gohmert turned to his art. The excitement on the floor was palpable. "He's grabbing posters!" someone distinctly whispered. And then they arrived:

(C-SPAN)

It's not really a typical congressional art spread, which can be found on the always impressive and up-to-date Tumblr collection of C-SPAN's Bill Gray. But the massive posters of the four men killed in the2012 Benghazi attack made their point. "They deserve the truth [about Benghazi] to come out," Gohmert said.

But what else could happen if the full "truth" comes out? Gohmert went on to cite a recent Breitbart post which tossed out the idea that the Obama administration may have violated an international law passed in 2011 against shipping weapons in or out of Libya. Said Gohmert:

If individuals within this administration then violated the international law that they pushed to create, then they probably need to be careful when they're traveling in years after they leave the White House or the administration efforts, because, who knows, might get an indictment somewhere in one of these international tribunals saying, "You've violated the U.N. law you passed!" You got guns into or out of Libya. You violated the law." People in this country need to understand that participating in the making of laws, and the participating in the violation of laws have consequences.

In Gohmert's world, the outcomes for the Obama administration could be seriously bleak: Either get defunded, or find yourself in an international criminal court. Luckily for them, both of these outcomes right now seem very, very unlikely.

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or
otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and
has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems
to be in violation of this rule.

Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.