michael Johnson thinks this is interesting:

In the interest of accuracy (the point of this hack, after
all), I should point out that the standard error of the estimate
formula given earlier isn't quite correct. However, it does provide
almost the same result as this more complex, but correct,
equation:

Share this highlight

Get Instant Access Now

Unlock the rest of Statistics Hacks
and 30,000 other books and videos

By clicking this box, you confirm that you have read and agree to the terms and conditions of our Membership Agreement, and you understand that when your trial period ends, you will be required to provide billing information if you wish to continue using the service.