The Anti-War Right

The trouble with Chaffetz’s brand of “antiwar” stance is that he
conceives of a “withdrawal” from Afghanistan being a prelude to the
perpetual use of air strikes and targeted assassinations. His
alternative of “going big” and eliminating strict rules of engagement
is a pose of “freeing” the military from constraints that the top
commanders themselves insist on having to give their mission the best
chance of success. Barring the deployment of an even larger force with
few constraints on how they operate, Chaffetz advocates a “withdrawal”
from Afghanistan that will be as non-interventionist as Israel’s
withdrawal from Gaza. In this approach, we will reserve the right to
launch attacks on their territory with impunity whenever we wish, but
otherwise we will wash our hands of the place and the consequences of
our actions.

James Joyner doesn't expect the tea party movement to join forces with Code Pink any time soon:

What strikes me as far, far more likely is that Iraq and Afghanistan
will once again remind us of the limits of American power and cause
Republicans to be more skeptical of future wars, both in terms of
intervening to begin with and in setting realistic war aims.

The result wouldn’t be a significant Republican Dove movement even
on the Left, true pacifists are a fringe in America but a much more
traditional Realist bent. As Andrew Sullivan wrote nearly three years ago, those people dominated the Republican Party until quite recently.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.