The enemy revealed

The root cause of why Christianity is losing the younger generation—and what
to do about it.

Published: 24 September 2009(GMT+10)

This is the pre-publication version which was subsequently revised to appear in
Creation32(3):48–51.

Photo stock.xchng

We are losing our children! Research indicates that 70% of teens who are involved
in a church youth group will stop attending church … 1

Similar statements from Christian leaders aren’t new, but many still can’t
seem to identify the root cause of the problem. However, most front-line evangelists
in the Western world have reached a consensus. The following quote is from a person
who shares his faith more times in a month than most Christians ever will in their
lives.

“I am an evangelist. I go around and talk with people. One-on-one conversations.
My time on college campuses and talking to high schoolers, the number one answer
that I get for there not being a God, so then I don’t have to believe
in [God/the gospel], is evolution. ”2

That’s a Christian evangelist’s take (based on experience); how about
an atheist’s opinion?

“The most devastating thing though that biology did to Christianity was the
discovery of … evolution. Now that we know that Adam and Eve never were real
people the central myth of Christianity is destroyed.

If there never was an Adam and Eve there never was an original sin. If there never
was an original sin there is no need of salvation. If there is no need of salvation
there is no need of a saviour. And I submit that puts Jesus, historical or otherwise,
into the ranks of the unemployed.”3

So despite many compromising Christians saying there is no conflict between faith
in the biblical God and evolutionary theory, intelligent people around the world
see the inconsistency clearly.

What “not to do”!

Proverbs 26:4 (bold added) says “Do not answer
a fool according to his folly, or you will be like him yourself.” Who is the
“fool”? Psalm 14:1 says “The fool says in his heart, ‘There
is no God’” (I.e. an atheist). So Christians should not answer atheists
according to their way of thinking or else they will appear foolish themselves.

Christians that accept evolution as God’s way of “creating” are
not winning the battle in debate situations. Take the following discourse between
theistic evolutionist Francis Collins and atheist Richard Dawkins;

COLLINS: By being outside of nature, God is also outside of space and time. Hence,
at the moment of the creation of the universe, God could also have activated evolution,
with full knowledge of how it would turn out …

DAWKINS: I think that’s a tremendous cop-out. If God wanted to create life
and create humans, it would be slightly odd that he should choose the extraordinarily
roundabout way of waiting for 10 billion years before life got started and then
waiting for another 4 billion years until you got human beings capable of worshipping
and sinning and all the other things religious people are interested in.4

Point to Dawkins. Actually, several points. Collins says God “ … could
have activated evolution … ” But the Bible isn’t about what God
“could” have done. It’s about what He did. And how would
Collins answer the number one question skeptics ask about Christianity (“If
there is a loving God why is there so much death and suffering?”)? He can’t.
Peter Bowler, a renowned Darwin historian known for his antipathy to biblical creationists, understands the implications;

Describing Genesis as compatible with evolution is indefensible against an informed
opponent.

“If Christians accept that humanity was the product of evolution—even
assuming the process could be seen as an expression of the Creator’s will—then
the whole idea of Original Sin would have to be reinterpreted.

Far from falling from an original state of grace in the Garden of Eden, we have
risen gradually from our animal origins. And if there was no Sin from which we needed
salvation, what was the purpose of Christ’s agony on the cross? Christ became
merely the perfect man who showed us what we could all hope to become when evolution
finished its upward course.”5

Be consistent

The bedrock of logic is the law of non-contradiction. People that contradict themselves
in debates are made to look foolish by their opponents. Describing Genesis as compatible
with evolution is indefensible against an informed opponent. Take these excerpts
from a review by atheist Jerry Coyne of two books by theistic evolutionists;

“Why reject the story of creation and Noah’s Ark because we know that
animals evolved, but nevertheless accept the reality of the virgin birth and resurrection
of Christ, which are equally at odds with [secular interpretations of] science?
After all, biological research suggests the impossibility of human females reproducing
asexually, or of anyone reawakening three days after death.

Without good cause, Giberson and Miller pick and choose what they believe. At least
the young-earth creationists are consistent, for they embrace supernatural causation
across the board.” 6

A slap in the face

If Christians needed further confirmation of what ministries like CMI have been
warning about for years, they need look no further than this billboard from the
Freedom from Religion Foundation (US).

International humanist, atheist and skeptic bodies rightly see Darwinism as a powerful
weapon to undermine the Bible and Christianity. And they use undiscerning and naive
clergy to achieve their stated anti-God, anti-Christian agenda.

So effective has evolution been in converting people to atheism that skeptics are
boldly promoting using compromising Christians in their anti-God agenda! In a new
article on skeptic.com an author lists ‘105 Ways To Promote Skeptical Activism.’
In their ‘Quick Reference Guide’, point number 20 reads as follows;

20. Make allies. Be cooperative … We need help.
Build bridges.
Work with religious groups. (Our best allies for defending evolution are members
of the mainstream clergy groups.)7

So (according to the skeptics) the best allies for promoting atheism are collaborators
in the church that promote evolution. Little wonder the compromising Churches are
bleeding their young people (particularly the intelligent ones) out of their congregations
at an alarming rate.

Atheists are quick to draw Christians into an evolutionary world view because they
know where it leads. Jerry Coyne’s review continues;

“This disharmony [between science and religion] is a dirty little secret in
scientific circles. It is in our personal and professional interest to proclaim
that science and religion are perfectly harmonious.

Liberal religious people have been important allies in our struggle against creationism,
and it is not pleasant to alienate them by declaring how we feel.

This is why, as a tactical matter, groups such as the National Academy of Sciences
claim that religion and science do not conflict…”8

Militant atheist Eugenie Scott has said;

“I have found that the most effective allies for evolution are people of the
faith community. One clergyman with a backward collar is worth two biologists at
a school board meeting any day! … What we [such clergy and atheists] have
in common is that we want to see evolution taught in the public schools …
”9

‘One can have a religious view that is compatible with evolution only if the
religious view is indistinguishable from atheism.’10

So the strategy is simple. It’s like getting people to dig their own graves.
Suck Christians into believing in evolution then attack them on their intellectual
inconsistency. The aggressive atheist Dawkins does this very well.

“Oh but of course the story of Adam and Eve was only ever symbolic, wasn’t
it? Symbolic?! Jesus had himself tortured and executed for a symbolic sin by a non-existent
individual. Nobody not brought up in the faith could reach any verdict other than
barking mad!”11

What else does the Bible say about answering atheists?

Proverbs 26:5 says, “Answer a fool
according to his folly, or he will be wise in his own eyes.”

The apparent
contradiction between this and the preceding verse cited above is only there on
the surface—both apply in different ways.12
The last thing that an atheist needs to hear from a Christian is that his foundational
doctrine [evolution] is true, because there is no need of God, or a saviour in a
biblical sense, in that worldview.

Skeptics are boldly promoting using compromising Christians in their anti-God agenda

Without evolution there must be a creator that they are responsible to, there is
no third option. What they need is to have their foundation shattered,13 realize they have been standing on “sinking
sand”, and that as a sinner they need Christ desperately.

By answering them “according to their folly” (“scientifically”,
but without buying into their beliefs) and showing them how unwise it is to believe
in evolution, Christians can remove stumbling blocks to the faith. Modern arguments
from design and information theory vs. evolution are incredibly potent! (Potent
enough to make prominent atheists like British philosopher Antony Flew, for example,
long renowned as “an intellectual ambassador of secular humanism”, recently
turn his back on atheism.)

Draw the battle lines

So the enemy has been revealed. The atheists themselves have made it clear that
the most damaging idea to faith in God is evolution. Now that Christians know, perhaps
they should take to heart what has been attributed (wrongly—see Addendum) to the great Reformer Martin Luther about picking your spiritual battles.

“If I profess with the loudest voice and clearest exposition every portion
of the Word of God except precisely that little point which the world and the devil
are at that moment attacking, I am not confessing Christ, however boldly I may be
professing Him. Where the battle rages there the loyalty of the soldier is proved;
and to be steady on all the battle front besides, is mere flight and disgrace if
he flinches at that point.”14

Since Genesis is the most attacked book of the Bible today, we can confidently assume
that most people will have questions about Genesis and creation/evolution issue.
Therefore, by equipping ourselves with answers in this area we will be able to help
many people move closer to Christ.

Addendum 13 November 2009

The famous “battle” quote has been attributed to Luther for decades, including by Francis Schaeffer. But though Luther said many similar things, this quote did not actually come
from Luther but from a 19th century novel about Luther and the Reformation. See Where the battle rages—a case of misattribution.

References

Personal correspondence from Mark Cahill, evangelist and author
of One Thing You Can’t Do In Heaven.Return to text.

Frank Zindler (Professor of Philosophy-New York University),
American atheist, in a debate with William Craig, Atheism vs Christianity video,
Zondervan, 1996. Return to text.

<www.time.com/time/magazine/printout/0,8816,1555132,00.html>
Sunday, Nov. 5, 2006 God vs. Science We revere faith and scientific progress, hunger
for miracles and for MRIs. But are the worldviews compatible? TIME convenes a Debate
by David van BiemaA. Return to text.

Web Article-Seeing and Believing (The never-ending attempt
to reconcile science and religion, and why it is doomed to fail) by Jerry A. Coyne-A
review of the books Saving Darwin: How to be a Christian and Believe in Evolution
by Karl W. Giberson and Only A Theory: Evolution and the Battle for America’s
Soul by Kenneth R. Miller-The New Republic-A Journal of Politics and the Arts (February
04, 2009) <tnr.com/booksarts/story.html?id=1e3851a3-bdf7-438a-ac2a-a5e381a70472>.
Return to text.

With more information than ever before, Christians can stand tall because the Word of God is real, authoritative and accurate. Your support is vital in keeping this site going and growing. Support this site