Boehner Critics Blew It Before

Speaker of the House John Boehner.delivers remarks on June 25, 2014, on Capitol Hill, where he said the Republican-controlled House will file a... View Enlarged Image

Separation Of Powers: John Boehner's lawsuit against President Obama is being mocked by the very same people who dismissed an earlier challenge to Obama's imperial ways — one the Supreme Court unanimously upheld.

That case involved Obama's decision in early 2012 to make "recess" appointments to several key posts, though the Senate was still in session. As with Boehner's proposed suit, it was widely ridiculed as a "political stunt" without legal merit that would end up backfiring on the GOP.

New York Times editorial page editor Andrew Rosenthal argued that "Republicans have taken political ... opposition to a new extreme."

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid expressed his utter disdain this way: "How do I feel about that? How do I describe 'I don't care'? Because I don't."

But Jonathan Turley — a George Washington University law professor and generally an Obama supporter — took it seriously.

Writing in USA Today in February 2012, Turley argued that Obama's attempt to circumvent the legislature with these appointments "strikes at the very heart of our system of government and dangerously tips the balance of power."

He added that "replacing an intransigent Congress with an imperial president is no bargain for those who value our constitutional system."

Turns out Turley had it right. So right, in fact, that the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Obama violated the Constitution in making those appointments.

It's worth noting that the same cast of characters also mocked legal challenges to ObamaCare until the high court found several chunks of it unconstitutional.

Now these stray shooters are busy ridiculing Boehner's legal challenge, which seeks to rein in Obama's many other efforts to circumvent Congress.

Tribe says of the suit, "There's no there there," adding that it's "painfully clear that it lacks merit." The Times' David Firestone calls the suit a "mean-spirited attempt to deflect attention — specifically from the House's refusal to engage in the act of governing."

Reid took to the Senate floor this week to dismiss it as "a show trial" better suited for Judge Judy, who "would throw this case out in a half a second."

And Turley? Well, once again, he's taking it seriously.

At a congressional hearing on Wednesday, he described Obama's effort to bypass Congress on a range of fronts as "one of the greatest challenges to our constitutional system in the history of this country," and one that "threatens a fundamental change in how our country is governed."

Noted Turley: "It is tempting to embrace rule by a single person who offers to govern alone to get things done. However, this is the very siren's call that our Founders warned us to resist." Turley described the House's legal challenge a "historic step to address the growing crisis in our constitutional system."

Once again, Turley has it exactly right.

Speaker of the House John Boehner.delivers remarks on June 25, 2014, on Capitol Hill, where he said the Republican-controlled House will file a... View Enlarged Image

Separation Of Powers: John Boehner's lawsuit against President Obama is being mocked by the very same people who dismissed an earlier challenge to Obama's imperial ways — one the Supreme Court unanimously upheld.

That case involved Obama's decision in early 2012 to make "recess" appointments to several key posts, though the Senate was still in session. As with Boehner's proposed suit, it was widely ridiculed as a "political stunt" without legal merit that would end up backfiring on the GOP.

New York Times editorial page editor Andrew Rosenthal argued that "Republicans have taken political ... opposition to a new extreme."

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid expressed his utter disdain this way: "How do I feel about that? How do I describe 'I don't care'? Because I don't."

But Jonathan Turley — a George Washington University law professor and generally an Obama supporter — took it seriously.

Writing in USA Today in February 2012, Turley argued that Obama's attempt to circumvent the legislature with these appointments "strikes at the very heart of our system of government and dangerously tips the balance of power."

He added that "replacing an intransigent Congress with an imperial president is no bargain for those who value our constitutional system."

Turns out Turley had it right. So right, in fact, that the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Obama violated the Constitution in making those appointments.

It's worth noting that the same cast of characters also mocked legal challenges to ObamaCare until the high court found several chunks of it unconstitutional.

Now these stray shooters are busy ridiculing Boehner's legal challenge, which seeks to rein in Obama's many other efforts to circumvent Congress.

Tribe says of the suit, "There's no there there," adding that it's "painfully clear that it lacks merit." The Times' David Firestone calls the suit a "mean-spirited attempt to deflect attention — specifically from the House's refusal to engage in the act of governing."

Reid took to the Senate floor this week to dismiss it as "a show trial" better suited for Judge Judy, who "would throw this case out in a half a second."

And Turley? Well, once again, he's taking it seriously.

At a congressional hearing on Wednesday, he described Obama's effort to bypass Congress on a range of fronts as "one of the greatest challenges to our constitutional system in the history of this country," and one that "threatens a fundamental change in how our country is governed."

Noted Turley: "It is tempting to embrace rule by a single person who offers to govern alone to get things done. However, this is the very siren's call that our Founders warned us to resist." Turley described the House's legal challenge a "historic step to address the growing crisis in our constitutional system."

See Also

Leadership: Among the world's gamier states, there seems to be a new status quo: Kill your opponent. The murder of Boris Nemtsov is the latest such barbarism. It all suggests a void from the U.S. as leader of the free world.The brazen broad-daylight assassination of Nemtsov, a former Russian vice ...

Economy: In his weekly address, President Obama railed against Wall Street for giving "bad advice" that costs American families billions a year. OK, but what about his bad policies that have cost them far more?The president used his precious radio time to lash out at financial advisers for mistakes ...

Cities: The problem with socialism, Margaret Thatcher once noted, is you eventually run out of other people's money. In progressive Chicago, that's hit home as Moody's has cut its credit rating to two grades above "junk."Chicago's finances are staggering under the weight of an unfunded pension ...

Racial Politics: Attorney General Eric Holder complains that the U.S. needs a "lower standard of proof" to enforce civil-rights laws. Standards have already sunk under his "disparate impact" witch hunt. How low is enough? In an exit interview with Politico.com, the outgoing AG asserted, "Some ...

We recently launched the Committee to Unleash American Prosperity with the goal of persuading the presidential hopefuls in both parties to focus on the paramount challenge facing our country: slow growth and stagnant incomes. Faster growth isn't just needed to raise the living standards of ...

Select market data is provided by Interactive Data Corp. Real Time Services. Price and Volume data is delayed 20 minutes unless otherwise noted, is believed accurate but is not warranted or guaranteed by Interactive Data Corp. Real Time Services and is subject to Interactive Data Corp. Real Time Services terms. All times are Eastern United States. *Reflects real-time index prices.