The press corps is advancing—and many Republican officeholders are buying—the false notion that Obamacare is both politically toxic and politically bulletproof, a claim that seems rather contradictory on its face.

There are two good ways for Republicans to use reconciliation to advance the cause of repeal—use it to pass a bill to repeal the despised individual mandate, or use it to pass a bill to repeal as much of Obamacare as possible.

The 2017 Project’s executive director, Jeff Anderson, testifies that King v. Burwell provides a welcome opportunity for Congress to give states an off-ramp from Obamacare that leads to the genuine alternative Americans have been craving for years.

With immigrants’ percentage of the U.S. population approaching an all-time high, and with little thought being given to whether such largely unchecked immigration benefits Main Street, there is a clear opening for a presidential candidate who is willing to buck the liberal-corporate consensus.

If Republicans unite behind a tax-credit-based conservative alternative that would effectively repeal and replace Obamacare in 37 states, they can avoid turning a potential win at the Court into a loss for repeal.

When Obamacare was passed, the CBO said it would increase the number of people with health insurance by 26 million in 2015, but it now says the number is just 17 million, most of whom are being dumped into Medicaid.

Senator Ben Sasse introduces a bill that helps advance the cause of repeal in six ways, most importantly by reducing the likelihood that Republicans would respond to a favorable verdict in King v. Burwell by expanding or “fixing” Obamacare.

New polling finds that most Americans (including 55 percent of independents) want Congress to propose a conservative alternative in response to King v. Burwell, while only 20 percent (most of them Democrats) want Congress to negotiate fixes to Obamacare.