Tuesday, 26 February 2008

today finds me uploading some videos to youtube that defame the judge with a similar claim as the title of this blog. To anyone familiar with these blogs they will know that statement to be totally justified, self evident and in time proved in a court of law.

I heard today that ofwat are saying that the water companies are going to raise their charges by 5%. funny that eh Judge? So how much is that going to cost the tenants of houses of multiple occupancy your majesty??? A site lot more than it will Jonathan Morgan AM constituency Office. Has anyone put in a freedom of info request for that water charge, Mr. Morgan wouldn't reply to any that I might forward, and for the IPCC and South Wales Police that is a criminal offence.

Not that they care, I'm a drug addict bum in their eyes that deserves nothing. Well only time will tell, as more and more people view the videos on youtube. You will see that one of the offices that the judge uses is outside that of the Western mail and echo offices, which since the earlier blogs has since changed it signage to the of Media Wales, the national news media has kept a lid on all that I have done in order to just have a little bit of fairness for the 'Have nots' The only sad thing about it is that many of their employees will be getting robbed blind in houses of multiple occupancy, and their employers don't give a monkees stuff.

I wonder when all this finally hits the fan whether the people of Wales will have a week long boycott of that newspaper for their part in aiding and abetting the welsh Assembly in its criminal negligence of vulnerable adults, by refusing to call for a public inquiry into the various issues that I have brought to their attention. Even to the Police refusing to interview any of them under caution regarding the claims made in these blogs.

So judge here is a copy of a letter sent to the Benefits Agency last week I have tried to phone them twice in the last 2 days but nobody seems to be answering the phone just to confirm that they have received this letter. I havent informed the Usual Suspect of it existence but I had hoped that someone from the European Court of Human Rights might have been keeping a track of any updates to my blogs and read it.

the following letter if off in the post as of today 16th Feb 2008. It is something that some of the USUAL SUSPECTS really ought to have sorted out for me and the hundreds of thousands of other vulnerable adults in the UK, but they have refused to hold a public inquiry into these matters. Why? Probably because its me who has raised the issues.

The letter will be self explanitory to them and to the water company, who I trust in the fullness of time will be seen for what they are RIP OFF MERCHANTS. Will anyone bother to investigate this on the vulnerables behalf, the conflict of interest in the Rateable Valuer???

Only via the European Court of Human Rights it would appear, although I am fast losing faith that they are on the case. Here is the letter then to the Department of Works n Pensions dudes in Cardiff Jobcentreplus.

To: Tony PowellManagerJobcentreplus15th Feb 2008

Hi Mr. Powell re: your 5th feb 2008 letter

I am appealing your decision in the recent letter about my income support from your dept. The part I am appealing is the amount taken out for water. Under legislation the water company are bound by law to write off debts if a debtor is living on a limited income and have been paying off their debt for 2 years.

I believe that date ran out in 2002. I have applied via the citizen advice bureau and the first attempt failed for no particular reason?????? The second time I applied I refused to fill in the ‘what do you spend your money on?’ form. That the water company demand. I pointed out to the advisor that I believe my filling it in would prejudice my claim and asked the advisor to send it off with that written on the form. She refused??

I have written a number of blogs about this, sent it to the so-called great and good, like the first minister at the Welsh Assembly, pointing out that the water companies demand for the form to be filled in was in-fact in breech of human rights legislation in respect of my right to privacy. Unfortunately the Great and Good turned out to not be so.

I trust that this is enough to start the appeal process. If there were any real social justice, the unnecessary hardship that the water companies refusal to act on legislative requirements has caused me over these last 6 years ought to be more than just making them pay me back the over payments I have made due to their obvious prejudice towards my claim for the debt to be written off.

Another thing I raised with government is that the rateable value for this property is higher than that of a non-divided property in the area. That as it has been cut in half that the RV ought to be half of a house charge. That indeed there is a conflict of interest by the person (a council employee) who dreamt up the RV of this property, as the pro rata rent is greater than that of a non-divided house, plus it means that the council can also claim greater community charge.

The rent aspect could indeed be seen as defrauding the Department of Work and pensions via the housing benefit scheme that the council partake of. So I would also appeal Dwr Cymru’s right to take out their annual charge, at the rate that they do.

Your reference xxxxxxxxx(excluded for privacy reasons)

All the bestDavid Gabriel 15 blah de blah de blah address

For a full list of blogs go to http://bbccrazydave.blogspot.com/FIRST MINISTER FOR YOUR INFORMATION THEY PLAN TO TAKE OUT £11.14 PER WEEK NEARLY HALF THAT OF THE LATEST MP RISE FORECAST AMAZING ISN'T IT. THE SHARE HOLDERS OF DWR CYMRU DOING VERY NICELY AT THE VULNERABLES EXPENSE.

Well Judge it's now over a year since I've been appealing the decision of the Tribunal Service, and if that kangaroo court had taken on board the blogs that I had posted up till that time maybe they would have done something about this water charge and the so called debt that Welsh water claim that I owe them. Maybe the Act of parliament that forces water companies to write off debts of certain categaories of people would have been lived up to. As it hasn't been as the First Minsiter of the Welsh Assembly and his wife have done nothing to insure that it was written off. Only goes top prove that they are indeed discriminating against me, for their own adgenda and that certainly has nothing to do with SOCIAL JUSTICE. In fact their actions prove that NO SOCIAL JUSTICE EXISTS IN WALES.

AND YOU JUSGE HICKINBOTTOM HAVE DONE YOUR LEVEL BEST TO WASH YOUR HANDS OF THE WHOLE THING. DO YOU THINK THAT I AM THE ONLY ONE BEING RIPPED OFF BY THE WATER COMPANIES. BUT THEN ON YOUR SALARY SIR IT DOESN'T AFFECT YOU. NO DOUBT YOU HAVE SHARES IN THE WATER COMPANIES IN YOUR INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO EH MR. HICKINBOTTOM.

If there were any Social Justice then you would have been removed from your post as Chief Commissioner for the Tribunal Service the moment that you said the 'attempt to pervert the course of justice by then Tribunal Service Staff' was not within your remit.

Well I trust that your refusal to sue me for slander, like the refusal of Jonathan Morgan AM refusal to sue me for slander or Rodney Berman soon to be ex-chairman of Cardiff County Council refuses to sue me, just proves my claim.

You will see in the how I clean my clothes that they are still being washed in a bath, this sir is the 21st Century. Lots of people donate washing machines to track 2000 so that the impoverished can have certain items, but do you think any begging letter by me ever procured a second hand one. Oh no 'fuxk that bastard' seems to have been the order of the day. Yet the vulnerable are knocked for the perfume of their clothes. I really would like to see you hit skid row judge interms of depression, with useless hot water systems and you try and keep your clothes clean then. I really would like to see that. Because frankly judge you havent got a frigging clue about how the so called caring agencies don't give a stuff.

So 8 years of neglect, 8 years of being fobbed off, and finally it comes to defaming judges on the unofficial media of the www. All those people in favour of flogging those who don't cleave to the law, when you have Judges acting with the calous disregard that Judge Hickinbottom has to the issues that I have been raising, its the Law makers or the Law dispensator that really need that flogging.

Here then are the URL's of the videos that I have uploaded, some technical problems with batteries etc but I am sure that you will all get the Drift eh Your Majesty. Its only a pity that your buffers appear to have not acknowledged that I sent you a copy of one of my blogs Maam!

After all many of the Brave Soldiers that come back from war zones with 'shot away' brains will end up on skid row, or penalised in houses of multiple occupancy that the great and good who send them there will never experience what with their pensions and all.

THIS one is of the fop house for Cardiff's not housed but not on the street. I did send a letter to the Editor of the South Wales Echo. Regarding a story one of the Alcholics told me while I was doing my protest outside their office's, you know those railings that the council came and cut them down from, that still hasn't been resolved fully. After all what's the difference with them there and outside the old assembly meeting chamber, other than more people would have seen my lovely paintings outside the Echo Offices. I doubt that any inquiry will have gone into the cost of housing the needy in this place, or the service that is provided for that cost. The guy was kicked out at 0900hrs not allowed back in until 2100hrs and if he was five mionutes late they would make him wait till 2200hrs. That and he was sent out in the morning without even a frigging breakfast. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZNMRAsRs_E