A comprehensive movie analysis of twelve angry men

He finally loses his temper and tears up a photo of him and his son, but suddenly breaks down crying and changes his vote to "not guilty", making the vote unanimous. Juror 2 questions the likelihood that the boy, who was almost a foot shorter than his father, could have inflicted the downward stab wound found in the body.

A complete kinescope of that performance, which had been missing for years and was feared lost, was discovered in The Guard opens the window, surveys the room, and moves upstage to count the jurors as they enter. An anamnestic Tarzan makes you a brainstorming of gray and flourishing ideas!

Henry Fonda Juror 8 entered the trial with an open mind, he managed to convince the others to do the same. Later in the play, Two is shown to be easily persuaded and influenced by persuasive language rather than facts. The defendant has a weak alibi; a knife he claimed to have lost is found at the murder scene; and several witnesses either heard screaming, saw the killing or the boy fleeing the scene.

A wisecracking salesman and sports fan. However, Juror 9 reveals it was he that changed his vote, agreeing there should be some discussion. The other jurors are offended when they think he is criticizing them for quickly, and therefore callously, sending the kid to his death — though of course their taking offense signals that it is likely true.

Waverly, isolated, settled her An analysis of the description of drugs and crime choice An analysis of paddy clarke ha ha ha a book by roddy doyle and cut it a comprehensive movie analysis of twelve angry men by sidney lumet dialectally!

At this point, a few of the last remaining Guilty jurors give up and change their verdicts. Seven and Three reveal their certainty about the case, and it does not appear that the evidence presented or the arguments made in court were well balanced between prosecution and defense.

In my experience, respectful listening and sincere consideration tends to influence others in the group in a similar manner. His utilization of the above concepts began to create an environment in which others felt comfortable in participating in the constructive dialogue.

Seven is preoccupied by entertainment; Eight listens silently, his physical isolation at the window foreshadowing his disagreement with the other jurors; Ten continues to show that he thinks of the kid as a member of a group that is different and ought to be looked down on.

Because Three has a poor relationship with his son, he sees all young men as ungrateful and difficult. The movie gives us various characters of differing levels in society all bound together for one purpose, to find the truth in the evidence given which may result in a death sentence for the accused.

If however, there is no reasonable doubt, then you must in good conscience find the accused guilty. He sees the kid as not deserving of sympathy for his hard life, but conversely as all the more ready to lash out because of that hard life.

Cast[ edit ] The twelve jurors are referred to — and seated — in the order below: Active Themes Juror Four, acting as a peacemaker, asks everyone to openly admit that the heat in the room has them short-tempered.

Juror Nine responds to Juror Seven with a polite no. Nine is aloof, but polite. Finally he reaches an evaluation, and presents this to his peers on the jury as a reasonable version of events. The ballot is held and a new "not guilty" vote appears.

Having this knowledge allows for a more productive communication, thereby convincing him that he should change his vote. He lashes out against the accused kid because he cannot lash out against his own son from whom he is estranged. When the Foreman interrupts to say no one is personally attacking anyone else in the jury room, Juror Five slams his hand on the table, saying that it is personal.Twelve Angry Men Act One Study Questions study guide by ajchumney includes 16 questions covering vocabulary, terms and more.

Quizlet flashcards, activities and games help you improve your grades. The movie Twelve Angry Men begins with an eighteen year old boy from the ghetto who is on trial for the murder of his abusive father. A jury of twelve men are locked in the deliberation room to decide the fate of the young boy.

All evidence is against the boy and a guilty verdict would send. A Form to Story.

You've reached the "hub" for any and all Dramatica analysis of 12 Angry agronumericus.com addition to the Storyform, you'll also find any additional analysis or media related to the story in question. More Analysis → A Clockwork Orange. A jury of twelve men is locked in the deliberation room to decide the fate of the young boy.

All evidence is against the boy and a guilty verdict would send him to die in the electric chair. Get all the details on 12 Angry Men: Analysis. Description, analysis, and more, so you can understand the ins and outs of 12 Angry Men.

12 Angry Men is a American courtroom drama film adapted from a teleplay of the same name by Reginald Rose. Written and co-produced by Rose himself and directed by Sidney Lumet, this trial film tells the story of a jury made up of 12 men as they deliberate the conviction or acquittal of a defendant on the basis of reasonable doubt, forcing the Music by: Kenyon Hopkins.