If you haven't already, use the SFS Manager (next to Fatdog64 Package Manager) and download the fd64-devx_620.sfs then move it to /aufs/devsave, then use the System SFS Loader to load it. That might do the trick.

If you haven't already, use the SFS Manager (next to Fatdog64 Package Manager) and download the fd64-devx_620.sfs then move it to /aufs/devsave, then use the System SFS Loader to load it. That might do the trick.

Now I even know...

But I have a 630. not 620,And That's shows a type "failed to remount aufs" (Better: /mnt/home)

But I have a 630. not 620,And That's shows a type "failed to remount aufs" (Better: /mnt/home)

Hi Scotchialoo,

Fatdog64_630 is the testing version. The last officially released Fatdog is 620. I am running 630 myself but carried my savefile over from 620.

Question: Does the bottom left of your System SFS Loader show the same location as where the devx.sfs is?

For your info, /mnt/home is a symlink from /aufs/devsave and my System SFS Loader shows /mnt/home. The reason to put these kind of files here is because it is outside of your savefile. That way the savefile doesn't get full unnecessarily. You can put the files wherever you want as long as the Loader points to the correct location.

Edit: I was able to load the sfs on a fresh 630 boot. I don't know what the failed to remount /aufs error is about but it should load any sfs. I doubt there will be a devx_630 until all the testing is done. Not sure if the differences in 630 and 620 will cause your wacom not to compile correctly. I don't build/compile much.

Edit Again: Fatdog version 620 might already have what you are looking for:

But I have a 630. not 620,And That's shows a type "failed to remount aufs" (Better: /mnt/home)

Hi Scotchialoo,

Fatdog64_630 is the testing version. The last officially released Fatdog is 620. I am running 630 myself but carried my savefile over from 620.

Question: Does the bottom left of your System SFS Loader show the same location as where the devx.sfs is?

For your info, /mnt/home is a symlink from /aufs/devsave and my System SFS Loader shows /mnt/home. The reason to put these kind of files here is because it is outside of your savefile. That way the savefile doesn't get full unnecessarily. You can put the files wherever you want as long as the Loader points to the correct location.

Edit: I was able to load the sfs on a fresh 630 boot. I don't know what the failed to remount /aufs error is about but it should load any sfs. I doubt there will be a devx_630 until all the testing is done. Not sure if the differences in 630 and 620 will cause your wacom not to compile correctly. I don't build/compile much.

Edit Again: Fatdog version 620 might already have what you are looking for:

Update: Ok... I Failed about a /root/ Installation (.pet packages makes: /root/xf86-input-wacom instead of /root/... as a Normal Installation) but... Maybe Compile is works around.Last edited by Scotchialoo on Mon 11 Nov 2013, 07:31; edited 1 time in total

I'm afraid I told you the wrong thing. There is a fd-devx_630.sfs and a kernel-source-3.11.4.sfs. The newer files didn't get to my SFS Manager. You can download them from here. http://distro.ibiblio.org/fatdog/sfs/600/

I don't know how to get these things into the Fatdog SFS Manager where we could download them from a mirror that is faster than ibiblio. I found out when I was viewing the Fatdog630_rc thread. My apologies. roll:

I assume having these things would enable compilation without a workaround. :

I'm afraid I told you the wrong thing. There is a fd-devx_630.sfs and a kernel-source-3.11.4.sfs. The newer files didn't get to my SFS Manager. You can download them from here. http://distro.ibiblio.org/fatdog/sfs/600/

I don't know how to get these things into the Fatdog SFS Manager where we could download them from a mirror that is faster than ibiblio. I found out when I was viewing the Fatdog630_rc thread. My apologies. roll:

I assume having these things would enable compilation without a workaround. :

Unfortunately... That's same as without kernel-source-3.11.4.sfs...
When that's doesn't compiled as Normal...

Update [3/11/2013]: Solved from a Long ago.
I Can see that's xf86-input-wacom Will be compiled Successfully.
When in a Next Time I will be compiled a "2" for a Clearly package. Because I Compiling with Development package.
When Important for a Install is:
/usr/lib64/xorg/modules/input/wacom_drv.so and /usr/X11R7/lib64/X11/xorg.conf.d/50-wacom.conf

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot vote in polls in this forumYou cannot attach files in this forumYou can download files in this forum