I'm not angry I'm merely answering the question,you asked why this perception of God is sacred while creation is filthy & that my answer..Its not me who wrote how the god prided themselves on genetic purity,called themselves the pure ones of the sacred mound etc & Kings & royalty,who fancied they came down from gods thought they had blue blood etc divine right to rule because of their genetic heritage..& so on & so forth..It seems reasonable to believe this is the case?Ok well maybe a little angry I guess when I think about how short our lives are & I hear in the bible & old texts that it was done to us..first 120 yrs then 70 years..well out of orderWatched the video..answer still applies

if a persons belief is that 'God' is the Creator - then general feeling should be that maker has a responsibility for it's product....like if you make something - i use it - but find it doesn't function properly - so return it to you to rectify. But God... is exempt - doesn't get returns, just complaints... which are heard but ignored ....like, if i return the thing you made - the thing that didn't function properly - and you tell me - fack off - it was working perfectly when you took it off my hands - so is your fault .... i take no responsibiity. So it's about absolute perfection - someone/something thinks they or it is beyond reproach - that all others are below - beneath... so must bow in submission, and they do so --- as in heaven so on earth etc. Forgetting that God is an imposter, a psychotic control freak - hanging out between us and the true sacred - get past that crap and feel a miracle.

Thanks

- - -

"If we take eternity to mean not infinite temporal duration but timelessness, then eternal life belongs to those who live in the present.

All posts and media uploads are expressed opinions of the contributing members and
are not representative of or endorsed by the owners or employees of Disclose.tv.

This site may contain copyrighted material. Members may make such material available
in an effort to advance the awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights,
economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We
believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in
section 107 of the US Copyright Law.