Added milestone "Submit WG draft to IESG as Proposed Standard", due December 2017, from current group milestones

2017-08-04

01-02

Amy Vezza

Added milestone "Agree what algorithms and key formats to add or deprecate", due October 2017, from current group milestones

2017-08-03

01-02

Mirja Kühlewind

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind

2017-08-02

01-02

Suresh Krishnan

[Ballot comment]Looks fine to me. Have no strong feelings about external review.

2017-08-02

01-02

Suresh Krishnan

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan

2017-08-02

01-02

Kathleen Moriarty

[Ballot comment]I'm glad to see this work going forward and am also fine with skipping external review.

2017-08-02

01-02

Kathleen Moriarty

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty

2017-08-02

01-02

Ben Campbell

[Ballot comment]I'm fine skipping the external review.

2017-08-02

01-02

Ben Campbell

Ballot comment text updated for Ben Campbell

2017-08-02

01-02

Ben Campbell

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ben Campbell

2017-08-02

01-02

Alia Atlas

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas

2017-08-02

01-02

Deborah Brungard

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard

2017-08-01

01-02

Terry Manderson

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson

2017-08-01

01-02

Alexey Melnikov

[Ballot comment]I think I addressed comments from Warren and Spencer.

2017-08-01

01-02

Alexey Melnikov

Ballot comment text updated for Alexey Melnikov

2017-08-01

01-02

Alexey Melnikov

New version available: charter-ietf-dcrup-01-02.txt

2017-08-01

01-01

Alexey Melnikov

New version available: charter-ietf-dcrup-01-01.txt

2017-07-24

01-00

Alexey Melnikov

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov

2017-07-12

01-00

Warren Kumari

[Ballot comment]Editorial comments only:

1: Original:

DCRUP will consider four types of changes to DKIM: additional signingalgorithms such as those based on elliptic ...

[Ballot comment]Editorial comments only:

1: Original:

DCRUP will consider four types of changes to DKIM: additional signingalgorithms such as those based on elliptic curves, changes to keystrength advice and requirements, deprecating the use of SHA1,and new public key forms, such asputting the public key in the signature and a hash of the key in theDNS to bypass bugs in DNS provisioning software that prevent publishinglonger keys as DNS TXT records.

This sentence is really long, and I got lost in it. It says that there are 4 changes, but the wording makes it hard to figure out which they are.

Proposed (semi-colons to separate from the "such as"). Or, perhaps make this bullets instead?:DCRUP will consider four types of changes to DKIM: additional signingalgorithms such as those based on elliptic curves; changes to keystrength advice and requirements; deprecating the use of SHA1;and new public key forms, such asputting the public key in the signature and a hash of the key in theDNS to bypass bugs in DNS provisioning software that prevent publishinglonger keys as DNS TXT records.

2: "It will limit itself to existing implemented algorithms and key forms."The "it will limit itself" sounds odd in a charter; I'd suggest "It will be limited to..." or something similar (otherwise it sounds like this is an internal decision)

2017-07-12

01-00

Warren Kumari

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Warren Kumari

2017-07-12

01-00

Spencer Dawkins

[Ballot comment]I'm fine with doing this, without external review.

I'm a Yes for this one, but Alexey needs to be a Yes ...

[Ballot comment]I'm fine with doing this, without external review.

I'm a Yes for this one, but Alexey needs to be a Yes before it's approved, of course. But definitely the right thing to do.

I did see

DKIM also currently supports use of SHA1 coupled with RSA. SHA1 has been formally deprecated due to weakness especially when used in the context transport security, though the risk of a successful preimage attack is

I may be unaware of a well-known term of art, but I'm guessing "context transport security" is missing "of" (so, "context of transport security")?

less severe. Still, the community wishes to discourage its continued use in the DKIM context.

2017-07-12

01-00

Spencer Dawkins

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins

2017-07-12

01-00

Cindy Morgan

Telechat date has been changed to 2017-08-03 from 2017-04-27

2017-07-12

01-00

Alexey Melnikov

WG action text was changed

2017-07-12

01-00

Alexey Melnikov

WG review text was changed

2017-07-12

01-00

Alexey Melnikov

WG review text was changed

2017-07-12

01-00

Alexey Melnikov

Created "Ready w/o external review" ballot

2017-07-12

01-00

Alexey Melnikov

State changed to Internal review from Informal IESG review

2017-07-06

01-00

Alexey Melnikov

The WG wanted to clarify that deprecation of SHA1 use is in scope.

2017-07-06

01-00

Alexey Melnikov

State changed to Informal IESG review from Approved

2017-07-06

01-00

Alexey Melnikov

New version available: charter-ietf-dcrup-01-00.txt

2017-04-28

01

Cindy Morgan

New version available: charter-ietf-dcrup-01.txt

2017-04-28

00-04

Cindy Morgan

State changed to Approved from External review

2017-04-28

00-04

Cindy Morgan

IESG has approved the charter

2017-04-28

00-04

Cindy Morgan

Closed "Approve" ballot

2017-04-28

00-04

Cindy Morgan

Closed "Ready for external review" ballot

2017-04-28

00-04

Cindy Morgan

WG action text was changed

2017-04-28

00-04

Cindy Morgan

New version available: charter-ietf-dcrup-00-04.txt

2017-04-28

00-03

Cindy Morgan

WG action text was changed

2017-04-28

00-03

Cindy Morgan

New version available: charter-ietf-dcrup-00-03.txt

2017-04-27

00-02

Benoît Claise

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise

2017-04-26

00-02

Alia Atlas

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas

2017-04-26

00-02

Kathleen Moriarty

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty

2017-04-26

00-02

Alissa Cooper

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper

2017-04-26

00-02

Spencer Dawkins

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins

2017-04-26

00-02

Suresh Krishnan

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan

Added charter milestone "Agree what algorithms and key formats to add or deprecate", due October 2017

2017-04-26

00-02

Alexey Melnikov

New version available: charter-ietf-dcrup-00-02.txt

2017-04-25

00-01

Deborah Brungard

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard

2017-04-25

00-01

Ben Campbell

[Ballot comment]Please expand DKIM somewhere in the first sentence or so.

Milestones?

2017-04-25

00-01

Ben Campbell

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ben Campbell

2017-04-24

00-01

Adam Roach

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adam Roach

2017-04-24

00-01

Alvaro Retana

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana

2017-04-24

00-01

Mirja Kühlewind

[Ballot comment]Would it be already possible to add milestones?

2017-04-24

00-01

Mirja Kühlewind

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind

2017-04-24

00-01

Alexey Melnikov

[Ballot comment]Currently DKIM mailing list is not hosted on ietf.org. Should I request creation of a new one or keep using existing one ...

[Ballot comment]Currently DKIM mailing list is not hosted on ietf.org. Should I request creation of a new one or keep using existing one where people already participate?

2017-04-24

00-01

Alexey Melnikov

Ballot comment text updated for Alexey Melnikov

2017-04-24

00-01

Alexey Melnikov

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov

2017-04-23

00-01

Terry Manderson

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson

2017-04-23

00-01

Warren Kumari

[Ballot comment]I liked 00-00, and I still like 00-01 :-)

2017-04-23

00-01

Warren Kumari

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Warren Kumari

2017-04-22

00-01

Eric Rescorla

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Eric Rescorla

2017-04-14

00-01

Amy Vezza

Telechat date has been changed to 2017-04-27 from 2017-04-13

2017-04-14

00-01

Amy Vezza

Created "Approve" ballot

2017-04-14

00-01

Amy Vezza

State changed to External review from Internal review

2017-04-14

00-01

Amy Vezza

WG new work message text was changed

2017-04-14

00-01

Amy Vezza

WG review text was changed

2017-04-14

00-01

Amy Vezza

WG new work message text was changed

2017-04-14

00-01

Amy Vezza

WG review text was changed

2017-04-14

00-01

Amy Vezza

WG review text was changed

2017-04-14

00-01

Amy Vezza

WG review text was changed

2017-04-13

00-01

Alexey Melnikov

New version available: charter-ietf-dcrup-00-01.txt

2017-04-13

00-00

Kathleen Moriarty

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty

2017-04-12

00-00

Alia Atlas

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas

2017-04-12

00-00

Deborah Brungard

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard

2017-04-12

00-00

Ben Campbell

[Ballot comment]I aggree with Spencer's comments

2017-04-12

00-00

Ben Campbell

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ben Campbell

2017-04-12

00-00

Benoît Claise

[Ballot comment]Agreed with Spencer. I had to read this sentence multiple times."The only current algorithm is RSA,with advice that signing keys should ...

[Ballot comment]Agreed with Spencer. I had to read this sentence multiple times."The only current algorithm is RSA,with advice that signing keys should be between 1024 and 2048 bits. While1024 bit signatures are common, longer signatures are not because bugs inDNS provisioning software prevent publishing longer keys as DNS TXT records."

Please detail the milestones.

2017-04-12

00-00

Benoît Claise

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise

2017-04-11

00-00

Suresh Krishnan

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan

2017-04-11

00-00

Warren Kumari

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Warren Kumari

2017-04-11

00-00

Alissa Cooper

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper

2017-04-11

00-00

Mirja Kühlewind

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind

2017-04-10

00-00

Alvaro Retana

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana

2017-04-09

00-00

Alexey Melnikov

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov

2017-04-08

00-00

Eric Rescorla

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Eric Rescorla

2017-04-07

00-00

Spencer Dawkins

[Ballot comment]I'm a Yes, although I'm not the responsible AD, because this is the right thing to do.

I wonder if you ...

[Ballot comment]I'm a Yes, although I'm not the responsible AD, because this is the right thing to do.

I wonder if you need to include this in the text:

"The only current algorithm is RSA,with advice that signing keys should be between 1024 and 2048 bits. While1024 bit signatures are common, longer signatures are not because bugs inDNS provisioning software prevent publishing longer keys as DNS TXT records."