A 50-Point Case for the Flat Earth

Flat Earth

A 50-Point Case for the Flat Earth

Introduction

Like many others, I entered the flat Earth debate because I wanted to debunk this insane theory for the sake of my conspiracy-minded friends. I was going to save legitimate flat earthers from a seemingly obvious government Psychological Operation (PSYOP) meant to forever discredit “conspiracy theorists” everywhere. I truly believed that the leading flat earthers were likely government agents who wanted to discredit, by way of guilt by association, anyone who doubted the moon landings, 9-11, Sandy Hook, the Boston Bombing, vaccinations, etc.

From politicians to even “conspiracy theorists,” nearly everyone derides flat earthers. For example, Obama preached, “We don’t have time for a meeting of the Flat Earth Society,” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XB9–MF0tx0); derogatorily referred to Republican candidates as people “who would have been founding members of the Flat Earth Society” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rsz3uLxTwQs) (please note that the Flat Earth Society is very likely a front organization used to present a controlled weak argument for the flat Earth); and then again made certain to tell us how much “scientific evidence” supports the spherical Earth (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-dXBsZzR24). Obama has now publicly referenced the flat Earth on four separate occasions as a shameful belief.

Unbelievably, Neil deGrasse Tyson even said that influential flat earthers were dangerous to democracy and “harmful to the health, the wealth, and the security of our citizenry” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHBZkek8OSU).

On the other side, you have “independent” Joe Rogan (a former moon landings skeptic) who loves to make fun of flat earthers “obsessing over nonsense,” conservative Alex Jones who referred to the flat Earth theory as “clearly ridiculous” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmOB36NuvDw). All sides of the aisle make fun of flat earthers.

Only crazy and dangerous imbeciles would ever consider the arguments of the flat Earth? You can see boats disappear behind a curvature? You can see the curvature from an airplane or high mountain? Boats would fall off the edge of the Earth, right? And all of those photos of the Earth, how can anyone doubt NASA?

That’s where I began – to expose once and for all the silliness and supposed PSYOP origins of the flat earth movement. I continually researched, considered, pondered, and somewhat hoped to uncover the falsehoods of the flat earth movement. After several weeks and dozens of hours later, it didn’t happen; instead, I found many valid arguments in favor of the flat Earth – arguments that were not being answered effectively by mainstream science. In the end, the evidence supporting the flat Earth was more compelling and far exceeded the evidence supporting a globe Earth. As you will see, the evidence in support of a globe Earth is mostly scant, intellectually vacuous, refutable, and often based on little more than name calling and “scientific” conformity.

I am asking you, as a reasonable thinking person to consider the following 50 arguments in favor of the flat Earth theory. For a quick visual of how the flat Earth model works, please watch this short video from Rob Skiba: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R52_PdZlSq8.

I fully understand how ridiculous it sounds to you. Indeed, for someone to say that the Earth is flat sounds so awful that it may even shock you to your core as though someone attacked one of your most cherished beliefs. But ask yourself, why is it so offensive? Logically, it shouldn’t be offensive at all but society has made it extremely taboo, why? Why has the globe been equated with intelligence and been thrown in your face in thousands of television shows and movies? Why does astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson and others equate influential flat earthers with terrorists instead of just using it as an opportunity to let everyone scientifically prove our underlying cosmos? You should ponder these questions.

If I am wrong, and I could be, at the very least you’ll gain a much better understanding of how the world works as you logically defend the “official” model. But don’t let years of conditioning since you were a child prevent you from allowing scientific inquiry; true science would always welcome such questions but mainstream “science” has devolved into something similar to strict religious conformity that makes no allowance for independent thought or questioning.

I have no stake in this investigation other than the truth. Being new in very recent history, the flat Earth theory doesn’t have an answer for every question but if we all work together we may be able to create a true model of the Earth. If I am wrong, then I would appreciate well-reasoned counter arguments instead of irrelevant Wikipedia talking points or just pathetic name-calling. There isn’t a legitimate flat earther out there who wouldn’t welcome being proven wrong because the implications of control and widespread ignorance are so frightening. As for me, I believe it is more likely than not that we live on a flat Earth and so I now refer to myself as a flat earther. If you can, please prove me wrong and pull me out of this rabbit hole.

“He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.”

– Proverbs 18:13

Flat Earth Overview

Before progressing into the 50 exhibits proving the flat Earth, I recommend you watch all of the videos below as an overview. These videos will provide a good understanding of many arguments and counter-arguments underlying the flat Earth.

“The struggle, so violent in the early days of science, between the views of Ptolemy and Copernicus would then be quite meaningless. Either coordinate system could be used with equal justification. The two sentences, ‘the sun is at rest and the earth moves,’ or ‘the sun moves and the earth is at rest,’ would simply mean two different conventions concerning two different coordinate systems.”

– Albert Einstein, The Evolution of Physics, p.212 (p.248 in original 1938 ed.)

“In whatever way or manner may have occurred this business, I must still say that I curse this modern theory of Cosmogony, and hope that perchance there may appear, in due time, some young scientist or genius, who will pick up courage enough to upset this universally disseminated delirium of lunatics.”

– Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

“In the Middle Ages people believed that the earth was flat, for which they had at least the evidence of their senses: we believe it to be round, not because as many as 1 percent of us could give physical reasons for so quaint a belief, but because modern science has convinced us that nothing that is obvious is true, and that everything that is magical, improbable, extraordinary, gigantic, microscopic, heartless, or outrageous is scientific.”

– George Bernard Shaw

“Earth is a realm, it is not a planet. It is not an object, therefore, it has no edge. Earth would be more easily defined as a system environment. Earth is also a machine, it is a Tesla coil. The sun and moon are powered wirelessly with the electromagnetic field (the Aether). This field also suspends the celestial spheres with electo-magnetic levitation. Electromag levitation disproves gravity because the only force you need to counter is the electromagnetic force, not gravity. The stars are attached to the FIRMAMENT.”

– Nikola Tesla

“While I was thinking of this problem in my student years, I came to know the strange result of Michelson’s experiment. Soon I came to the conclusion that our idea about the motion of the Earth with respect to the ether is incorrect, if we admit Michelson’s null result as a fact. This was the first path which led me to the special theory of relativity. Since then I have come to believe that the motion of the Earth cannot be detected by any optical experiment, though the Earth is revolving around the Sun.”

“The theory of relativity is a mass of error and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the teachings of great men of science of the past and even to common sense … The theory, wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king. Its exponents are very brilliant men, but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists. Not a single one of the relativity propositions has been proved.”

Conclusion

If the Earth is flat, as the vast amount of evidence seems to show, then the flat Earth conspiracy amounts to the biggest cover-up and lie ever perpetrated against humanity; a lie that has literally lasted for hundreds of years and must permeate many institutions. If true, the implications of how much brainwashing and control we’re under is absolutely frightening. But is there any other “fact” that we were programmed to believe more than the shape of the Earth? Are scientists ever taught to challenge the status quo? The globe model was pushed on us from the earliest age, why?

For me (others may disagree), the strongest pieces of evidence in support of the flat Earth are the following:

No Curvature. No measurable curvature even though the curvature should be easily detectable with modern instruments and experienced in everyday life.

No Photographs of the Earth from Space. Despite the claim that there are thousands of satellites far away enough from the Earth to take a picture of the whole Earth, there are admittedly no legitimate photographs of the Earth; NASA even says that these photographs were created to “match people’s expectations.” Is that science or propaganda? Other evident fakery from space agencies, including the ISS and the Space Shuttle, further supports this argument.

The Sun and Moon are Local. The Sun is not 93 million miles away (and the Moon is not 234,000 miles away) as proven from various time-lapse videos, decreasing/increasing sizes, light concentration, trigonometry, and other means.

The Professionals. Pilots, engineers, surveyors, gunners, artillerymen, etc. do not account for curvature in any manner.

The Non-Spinning Atmosphere. The atmosphere evinces no properties of spin as required by fluid dynamics. The purported 1,000 mph spin of the Earth at the equator should have a tremendous impact on flights, water, volcanic eruptions, skydivers, wind, etc., but there’s no evidence of such a spin. The Coriolis Effect on the directional rotation of storms only supports the flat Earth.

No Centripetal or Other Forces of Movement Detected. Even though centripetal forces may increase substantially from the arctic to the equator (from 100 mph to more than 1,000 mph), weight does not change (an estimated 0.3% change in weight should be measurable with modern equipment and affect manufactures and there is no change in weight whatsoever). Further, a point on the Earth is sometimes supposedly moving with the 66, 600 mph orbit and sometimes against it; these possibly radical centripetal force changes have no physical effect on an individual and are not measurable. Moreover, the Earth supposedly orbits the Sun at 66,600 mph as the Earth spins at 1,000 mph. On one side of the Earth, the ground would be moving 66,600 mph towards your feet; on the other side of the Earth, the ground below you would be moving away from your feet at 66,600 mph. This daily and drastic change should be felt or measured daily and gravity does not seem to account for it.

The Explanation of Daylight and Stars is Not Workable on the Globe Model. Based on the “official” globe model where daylight should be located between the Earth and the Sun, there should be a substantial global change of stars every six months as the nights should be pointed in opposite directions. Because this doesn’t happen, the globe model must be false.

Same-Sized Sun and Moon. Despite the purported extreme differences in distance and size, the Sun and Moon are almost the same size from our perspective – a statistical impossibility by chance alone. Also, the Sun and Moon rotate the same distance throughout the same time period – how’s that possible under the globe model?

Properties of Water. The level properties of water and no bulging of the oceans at the equator despite the spin demonstrate that Earth is not a spinning a ball.

The Impossible Moon. In the video of an amateur rocket launch, the Moon appears very small but well above the horizon when it should be on the other side of the Earth proving that the Moon and Sun circle above a flat surface.

The Vacuum. There’s no way that our atmosphere supposedly parallels an enormous vacuum. The vacuum of space would overpower any hold that gravity would have over the low-mass atmosphere.

The North Star. The “official” globe model says that the Earth is currently spinning at 1,042 mph, wobbling, bouncing daily, and revolving around the Sun at 66,600 mph; the Sun (taking the Earth with it) is moving at 447,000 mph; the whole galaxy is moving at 373 miles/second; and, the entire universe continues to expand from the Big Bang. Meaning that the Earth is moving in various direction at more than 1,860,000 mph. The problem? The North Star has NEVER changed its position in known history and that certainly belies common sense.

The Non-Wobbling Sun in the Arctic. During the 24-hour days of daylight, videos show the Sun spin in a circle over the Arctic sky horizon. However, the Sun should not spin but follow a zig-zag pattern if the “official” model was correct. This proves the “official” model is false and the evidence fits perfectly on a flat Earth model.

5 thoughts on “A 50-Point Case for the Flat Earth”

I have spent a year now investigating flat earth and I find the evidence for flat is compelling. I am now in a position after all this time where globe earth seems more and more implausable and the weight of evidence for flat keeps growing. On a recent weekend camping trip I was happy to observer that when i now watch the sun and moon I see them moving across a flat plane and it all makes much more sense. It all makes much more sense.

So, have you tried going to Google Earth and its background Star map, to check how it is possible for people as much as 20 degrees below the equator to see the Pole star, and not possible to get the nice stars circling it in time exposure except from the north pole?