Jesus' Transfiguration: The Father's
Testimony of His Son

Jesus' transfiguration is recorded in three accounts of His life (Luke 9:28-36;
Matthew 17:1-13; Mark 9:2-13). Consider
some lessons we can learn from this Bible event.

The appearance of Moses and Elijah

Jesus often went apart to pray. Prayer was an important part of His life.
When praying, He often sought a time when He could have privacy. Cf. Matt.
14:23; Mark 1:35; Luke 6:12; Matt. 26:36ff.

On this particular occasion, Jesus went up on a mountain to pray. With Him
were Peter, James, and John. These three apostles seem to be the most prominent
or frequently mentioned in the accounts of Jesus' life. Several times these
three played important roles when others are not mentioned. Cf. Matt. 26:36ff;
Mark 5:37 (see also Mark 13:3).

As He prayed, He was "transfigured" (Mark 9:2). This means His
countenance or facial appearance was changed. His clothes became white and
glistening.

Cf. Ex. 34:29-35 where the skin of Moses' face shone when he had been in the
presence of God to receive the law (2 Cor. 3:7-18; cf. Acts 6:15). This was a
miracle, which surely proved God was with and working through the one whose
appearance was so altered. Perhaps it even symbolized that Jesus would be a
law-giver as Moses had been (Heb. 1:1,2).

As this happened, there also appeared Moses and Elijah talking with Jesus.
Moses was the giver of the Old Testament law. Elijah was one of the most
noteworthy prophets of the Old Testament. When thinking of the Old Testament
law, these are two of the men Jews would think of first and with greatest
prominence.

Moses and Elijah discussed with Jesus about Jesus' coming death in Jerusalem.
What was the relationship between Jesus' death and the work of Moses and Elijah?
His death ended the force of the laws revealed and taught by these Old Testament
prophets (Col. 2:14-17). Note, however, that these men were not antagonistic
toward this event, but freely discussed it with Jesus. This shows that Jesus'
work was not a contradiction or a violation of what they had done, but rather a
fulfillment of it, completely in harmony with God's plan as revealed through the
Old Testament prophets.

Note also that we have here one of many references showing that Jesus' death
was part of God's will, purposed and understood long before it happened. Moses
and Elijah here discussed it with Jesus. Evidently they understood the necessity
of it, and did not in any way view such an event as contrary to Old Testament
teaching.

Peter's proposal

As on other occasions, the disciples were sleeping while Jesus was praying
(Matt. 26:40-45). Note how much we miss when we sleep through great
opportunities for spiritual work. This is a general tendency for all people,
some worse than others. We seek our own physical ease and leisure, when there
are opportunities for spiritual work.

However, this does not mean the event here was simply a dream that did not
physically occur. When the disciples saw the event, they were "fully
awake." Then they saw the glory of Jesus' transfiguration, and they saw
Moses and Elijah with Him.

Moses and Elijah, having talked with Jesus, were about to leave. But Peter
suggested they made three tabernacles (or dwelling places) -- one for each of
these three great teachers.

The accounts says, however, that in saying this Peter did not know what he
was saying. Mark adds that he did not know what to answer, "for they were
sore afraid." Clearly, what Peter said here is a mistake. Had he fully
understand the significance of these events, he would not have said it.

Peter was often the one to make impetuous mistakes. He seemed to always think
something had to be said or done, so without sufficient thought he proceeded. He
often made mistakes as a result, but sometimes he also said and did great things
as a result (Matt. 26:31-35,69-75; 1613-18; 14:22-33; John 20:1-10; chap. 21;
Acts 2,3,4).

What was his mistake? Note that Moses and Elijah were leaving, but Peter
introduced his suggestion by saying, "It is good for us to be here."
Likely this means Peter realized some great historic event was occurring. It was
wonderful to have these 3 great teachers together. So let Moses and Elijah not
leave (as they were about to do). Rather, let them make three places where they
can just stay. The prophets would not have to leave, but could stay and people
could continue to benefit from their teaching. (Another possibility was that
Peter was suggesting three memorials, one to honor each of these men.)

Perhaps Peter is here putting Moses and Elijah on an equal with Jesus -- each
one gets a dwelling place. In any case it is clear that he wanted to keep Moses
and Elijah here on earth -- don't let them go away, but we will continue to
benefit from their teachings. That this is not God's will is shown by God's
reaction in answer to Peter's mistake.

Even as Peter was making this statement, God responded to it. A cloud
overshadowed them, causing the disciples to fear as they entered into it. Clouds
had other times indicated the presence of God (Ex. 13:21,22; 33:9,10).

Listen to Jesus.

A voice spoke from this cloud, which was obviously the voice of God the
Father, for it referred to Jesus as His Son.

He referred to Jesus as "My beloved Son." Matt. 17:5 adds "in
whom I am well pleased." This is what the Father had said from heaven when
Jesus was baptized (Matt. 3:17).

Then He said to "hear Him." When the cloud and voice were gone,
only Jesus was left present -- i.e., Moses and Elijah were gone. What is the
significance of this?

God had caused the change of Jesus' appearance and the presence of Moses and
Elijah as a sign that God was speaking through Jesus. This was a miraculous
confirmation of Jesus' work. God was speaking through Jesus, just as surely as
He had in the past spoken through prophets like Moses and Elijah (Heb. 1:1,2).
It was the purpose of all miracles to provide confirmation of a message as being
from God (Acts 2:22; Mark 16:20; Heb. 2:3,4; Acts 14:3; etc.). Having seen this,
the disciples should never again doubt that, when Jesus spoke, His words were
from God. Their later recounting of this event would likewise testify to others
of Jesus' approval by God (cf. 2 Peter 1:16-19).

However, Peter went further than God intended; he assumed things that were
not what God meant for them to conclude. Peter appeared to be honoring Moses and
Elijah equally with Jesus, or at least to want to hold on to the authority of
Moses and Elijah as well as that of Jesus. This was not God's intent, so God
removed Moses and Elijah, left Jesus only, and emphasized that people should
hear Him -- Jesus, not Moses and Elijah.

Hence, the lesson is that Jesus is a lawgiver and prophet, as surely as were
Moses and Elijah (Deut. 18:15-19; Acts 3:18-24; Col. 1:18; Phil. 2:5ff). But He
is not a giver and prophet of the same law as they were, nor is He on a par with
them (Matt. 16:13-18). God does not speak to us by the Old Testament prophets
today, but by His Son (Heb. 1:1,2). Today, we do not listen to the Old Testament
law and prophets, but to the gospel revealed by Jesus (Heb. 10:9,10; Col.
2:14-17; Eph. 2:14; Gal. 3:26,27; Rom. 7:1-7; etc.).

The mistake made by Peter was repeated by many later Jews, even in the
church. They wanted to hold to both Moses and Jesus -- both the Old Testament
law and the New Testament law (Gal. 2; 5:1-6; Acts 15). Many people today make
the same mistake. They want to bind the New Testament and also parts of the Old
Testament. But from the very first time this mistake was made, God corrected it
by removing Moses and Elijah and leaving Jesus only.

Jesus' message is not in conflict with that of Moses and Elijah. But neither
is it just an addition to their words. His message replaces theirs. We do not
follow the commands given through Moses and the commands given through Jesus.
Rather we should listen to Jesus only. Moses and Elijah are removed. Their law
is no longer in effect.

For further study I encourage the reader to go to https://www.gospelway.com/instruct/
and study our free online article about
the old law for today. You may also be interested in the free article about the
claims of Jesus.

(c) Copyright David E. Pratte, 2/5/2005

To study more articles like this (syndicated
for reproduction) visit our Bible
study topics web site. This article is freely available to be
reproduced in print or on a web site under the following conditions: (1) The
article must be reproduced verbatim in total without any change in content, (2)
the name of the author and web site addresses must be included (as in this
trailer), (3) the use must be entirely non-commercial with no fee or financial
charge of any kind to the readers. Click
here for more information about our copyright guidelines.