Hi Thorsten (and others),
have you considered that SPARQL-DL may not be a good name for a technology that has an entirely different syntax and semantics from SPARQL? When I looked at this, I expected to find a DL-friendly subset of SPARQL. But this is not what SPARQL-DL is.
I believe there is enough confusion on the marketplace already. Why not call it something like OWL-QL?
Thanks,
Holger
On Mar 3, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Thorsten Liebig wrote:
> We are happy to announce the initial release of our SPARQL-DL query engine that is settled on top of the OWL API. The library is aligned with the OWL 2 standard and adds a SPARQL-DL interface to every OWL API 3 reasoner.
>
> Release 1.0.0 and accompanying documentation can be found at:
> http://www.derivo.de/en/resources/sparql-dl-api/
>
> Best,
> The RDF/OWL team at derivo
>
> --
> Dr. Thorsten Liebig
> Phone +49 731 502 4207
> mailto:liebig@derivo.de
>
> derivo GmbH <http://www.derivo.de>
> James-Franck-Ring, 89081 Ulm, Germany
> Amtsgericht Ulm, HRB 725444
> CEO: Dr. Thorsten Liebig
>
>