Buffett rule heads to the Senate; Let the tax season begin

By Rebekah Rast — Nothing like a little tax question from the president to get you ready for April 17:

“When it comes to paying down the deficit and investing in our future, should we ask middle class Americans to pay even more at a time when their budgets are already stretched to the breaking point? Or, should we ask some of the wealthiest Americans to pay their fair share?” President Obama said in his weekly address.

Interesting how the only option is an either or. Tax one group or tax the other — take your pick.

Obviously, the president would like to tax the “rich,” using his favorite model provided by billionaire investor Warren Buffett. Under the Buffett rule everyone making more than $1 million will pay at least 30 percent of their income in taxes — whether it comes from income or investment.

Where are the trillions of other dollars going to come from to pay down the deficit, Mr. President?

You see, even if Obama got everything he wanted, no strings attached, it wouldn’t help bring down the deficit. Taking more from one group to use on another is nothing but the redistribution of wealth. It does not create new wealth and will not get America a balanced budget.

In fact, a likely scenario if the Buffett rule was enacted would be to see the country go from bad to worse — further troubling the fiscal crisis facing America.

The wealthy in this country usually invest their earnings. They invest their wealth so it grows, but their investment also provides capital for the growth of businesses, small and large alike. If suddenly both investment and regular income are taxed at a much higher rate, less money will become available for American businesses.

“The Buffett rule sounds good in principle. High-income taxpayers should pay at least as large a share of their income in taxes as the rest of us. But most already do. On average, middle-income households will pay 2015 taxes totaling about 15 percent of their income (using the legislation’s definition). Without the Buffett rule, more than 99 percent of millionaires will pay more than that and only about 4,000 will pay less. Barely 10 percent of them will pay less than 20 percent. The proposed legislation would certainly raise taxes on a lot of high-income taxpayers. But the price would be even more complicated tax code.”

Though the chances of it making its way through and out of Congress are slim to none, it is disturbing that the White House solution to this country’s economic woes is higher taxes.

Obama went on to say in his weekly address, “We don’t envy success in this country. We aspire to it. But we also believe that anyone who does well for themselves should do their fair share in return, so that more people have the opportunity to get ahead — not just a few.”

Considering that the federal government’s favorite day is right around the corner, April 17, this is the perfect time in the eye’s of Obama to bring up the Buffett rule — again.

When will he understand that higher taxes will not make America prosper and it will not dig the country out of the debt hole it has created?

Winston Churchill explains the irony of a government that attempts to tax more in order to be more prosperous: “We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.”

As Obama attempts to keep America in the bucket, let’s hope members of Congress crawl their way out and come up with real solutions to help this country pay down the debt without further riding on the backs of those who in most cases do pay their fair share.

Rebekah Rast is a contributing editor to Americans for Limited Government (ALG) and NetRightDaily.com. You can follow her on twitter at @RebekahRast.