uggh. Please don't involve me in these experiments with you and your father that your previously edited post above mentioned.

You will need somebody else to guide you from now on. I wont become a part of your learning experience since you want to put up work told by Ed would end in failure. This has been a clear waste of my time. Thank you.

If you were aware the person only had one post, you knew better. Don't expect feedback from coqui. If you do get a response, the chance that the target was set up correctly is nil to none.

Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:49 am

JayBird

Re: 1749 3500

AnShengDa wrote:

Deleted, due to , no feedback, don't trust the initial thread** starter's setup of the target.Don't hinder my progress.

Why delete, you should keep it up for others to learn from your obvious mishaps. Perhaps someone else will be able to avoid them. If interested, examine my early posts of ignorance to save you more trouble.

Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:53 am

AnShengDa

Ultimate User

Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:51 amPosts: 172

Re: 1749 3500

I am well aware of the previous posts concerning that topic. However, I never ran a session when I have been exposed to it. I wanted to see the difference in data skew for myself, hence the 'experiment'. I deleted my thread b/c I had a strong feeling this is 'Skeptic' from the other thread we all read. I don't want to give him any participation. If it's not Skeptic, this user can learn from this. As I said, I know the post count was low, but I was experimenting. I wish to really just understand the feeling of being skewed from my target if there is a feeling, you know some of the things that weren't mentioned.

Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:17 am

capjaneway

Ultimate User

Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:03 pmPosts: 311Location: Netherlands

Re: 1749 3500

Are we going to get any feedback or what?!

I have a pretty good feeling about this session.THE TARGET'D BETTER BEEN SET UP PROPERLY!

_________________To boldly go where no one has gone before!

Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:40 pm

AnShengDa

Ultimate User

Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:51 amPosts: 172

Re: 1749 3500

I was pretty sure about my session (although stage 4 is said to be trash) as well regardless of the exposure to some reefer in the air a few days prior I'm on a really good streak, so some feedback would be nice ^_^

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum