What I would like to of you to learn the under viagra viagra professional vs viagra the titlename as well have any, or if you content related to some major. Im not asking them to is put into the datastore.

Look­ing at this bit of the SXSW panel on Edupunk, I have this to say:

It seems that Edupunk really has become about anar­chy, just as Gard­ner feared, at least in the minds of many. Downes’ social club the­ory of edu­ca­tion is just the sort of point­less pop­ulist angst that punk exploited, and which dif­fers, I would argue, from the more authen­tic (in quotes) Clash-like music, where one gets a sense of hope. I’m not sure where it comes from, but it’s there, and it’s also not call­ing for destruc­tion. I think it’s this: the Clash knew the lim­its of the medium — rouse but do not pre­scribe, but also do not pro­scribe. After all, we’re just a band. Leave social change for others.

I am afraid that Downes comes off as a typ­i­cal rep­re­sen­ta­tive of a now com­mon­place mil­lenar­i­an­ism among instruc­tional tech­nol­o­gists, at least at con­fer­ences — where the Las Vegas prin­ci­ple seems to apply (“What hap­pens at ELI stays at ELI”). It’s a cargo cult.

Jim Groom is no mil­lenar­ian. For him, the essence of Edupunk is not in its anar­chism, but in its com­mu­ni­tarin­ism, if I may impose that word upon him — the relo­ca­tion of decision-making and cre­ativ­ity in the hands of fac­ulty, stu­dents, and tech­nol­o­gists, and not in the hands of cor­po­rate busi­ness mod­els that may appear to be log­i­cal and nec­es­sary from an admin­is­tra­tive point of view, but which are in fact nei­ther. This does not at all mean Kill the Uni­ver­sity, as Downes very clearly argues. It means, Let’s not go down this slip­pery slope that cer­tain kinds of soft­ware seem to be push­ing us. That’s pretty much it (which is a lot).

Iron­i­cally, Downes’ approach puts edu­ca­tion much more in the hands of anony­mous cen­tral­iza­tion, for with­out the res­i­den­tial cam­pus, there is no medi­at­ing insti­tu­tion between Google or the Cana­dian gov­ern­ment and the indi­vid­ual. Downes com­mits the clas­sic fal­lacy of rad­i­cally indi­vid­u­al­is­tic polit­i­cal thought — the destruc­tion of sup­pos­edly oppres­sive insti­tu­tions like col­leges, fam­i­lies, etc. only cre­ates the social con­di­tions of anomie and total­i­tar­i­an­ism. Good luck with that.

Edupunk, for me, is really all about what Gard­ner and Jim, like McCart­ney and Lennon, had going at the very begin­ning. A dis­cus­sion about what sort of lead­er­ship is appro­pri­ate to aca­d­e­mic tech­nol­ogy, given this new mil­lieux of tech­nol­ogy. What do we teach our stu­dents and fac­ulty, both crit­i­cally and prac­ti­cally? We need to recover this thread; from what I can see, the SXSW panel did not achieve this.