Wednesday, January 28, 2015

War: Made in USA

In its secret places, our government contains many Civil War re-enactors. Trouble is, they like to create Civil Wars in other countries, with live ammunition.

Ukraine. The above video comes from 2013, before the coup, when a Ukrainian Deputy named Oleg Tsarov revealed what he knew about American involvement in destabilizing that country.

The project is currently overseen and under the responsibility of the US ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey R. Pyatt.

After the conversation with the organisation "Volya“ I have learned that they succeeded to access Facilities in the project "TechCamp“ disguising as a team of IT specialists.

To their surprise, briefings on peculiarities of modern media were held.

American instructors explained how social networks and Internet technologies can be used for targeted manipulation of public opinion as well as to activate protest potential to provoke violent unrest on the territory of Ukraine Radicalisation of the population and triggering of infighting.

American instructors show examples of successful use of social networks used to organise protests in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya.

Same story in Syria. Yousaf al Salafi, a commander of the so-called Islamic State, has confessed that ISIS has been receiving funds from the United States.

“During the investigations, Yousaf al Salafi revealed that he was getting funding – routed through America – to run the organisation in Pakistan and recruit young people to fight in Syria,” a source privy to the investigations revealed to Daily Express on the condition of anonymity.

“The US has been condemning the IS activities but unfortunately has not been able to stop funding of these organisations, which is being routed through the US,” a source said.

“The US had to dispel the impression that it is financing the group for its own interests and that is why it launched offensive against the organisation in Iraq but not in Syria,” he added.

There are reports that citizens from Libya, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India besides other countries are being recruited by the IS to fight in Syria. Posters and wall chalking in favour of the IS have also been seen in various cities in Pakistan.

When are Americans going to wake up?

At this moment, Congress is debating an authorization for the use of military force, allegedly to fight against ISIS. Make no mistake: There will be no anti-ISIS effort, at least not in Syria.

We created ISIS. The piece quoted above is but one of many pieces of evidence proving the point. Even if you can assail the credibility of the article cited above, you cannot dismiss all of the evidence, which we have presented in many previous posts.

Why did we create ISIS? The situation is really quite simple.

Many Americans are such dunderheaded Islamophobes that they simply cannot comprehend the division between Sunni and Shiite, even though that divide is of paramount importance. Some time ago, the Israelis chose sides. They decided that they could live with the Sunnis. Even the most fanatical Sunnis -- al Qaeda and their brethren -- were considered tolerable and potentially useful.

At the same time, the Israelis decided that the great Shiite powers must go.

Many American Middle East experts have been taught that Shia Islam is "the terrorist branch" of Islam. This absurd contention flies in the face of all evidence: ISIS is Sunni, Al Qaeda is Sunni, all of the 9/11 hijackers were Sunni.

Nevertheless, the Americans -- like the Israelis -- have picked sides in a conflict that is many centuries old, and which has nothing to do with our society. We are against the Shiites, and thus we have decided to support (covertly) the worst elements on the Sunni side of the line. Now matter how extreme their beliefs, no matter how obnoxious their behavior, young Sunni jihadists will get funding from Uncle Sam, as long as they function as our proxy warriors.

Iran has a Shiite government.

It's ally, Syria, is headed by Bashar Assad. He is a Shiite -- or, rather, an Alawite, which, for present purposes, comes to the same thing.

Thus, Iran and Syria have been targeted for Balkanization and generalized ruin. We want those countries to be reduced to rubble and rendered ungovernable. That's what neocons really mean when they speak of "liberation."

The United States created a massive and fanatical Sunni army -- Al Qaeda, ISIS, Nusra -- to do that job. Most of these fighters don't come from Syria. They are disaffected young fools from in Europe, Pakistan and other areas who feel that they have a God-given right to skulk into Syria and take over the place.

We secretly sponsored jihadist preachers who told these young fools to go to Syria. We let these proxy warriors travel unimpeded. We let them cross the border unimpeded.

We created a monster that we no longer can control.

Obama seeks the authorization of military force for the sole purpose of making sure that ISIS gets back in line. We want them to forego Iraq and focus on bringing down the Assad government in Syria.

We don't need to authorize the use of American military force against ISIS. We need to support the one and only legitimate military force doing combat with ISIS -- the Syrian army.

And we need to stop letting Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia direct our behavior in the region.

It still amazes me how so many 'leftwing' people just couldn't understand that the Arab Spring was just 'colour revolution' updated and applied in the Arab area. It's as if the CIA means absolutely fuck-all to them.

They're unlikely to get a handle on the ongoing organisation of society around permanent war.

As for US 'soft power' exercised through Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc., there is a power not under US 'funding' (i.e. control): the KGB. This is what makes the troubles in the Russian sphere of influence, including the Zionist role, of geopolitical importance.

The fucking media. The fucking media! Takes a couple of hours now to make progress on the internet towards finding contemporary news reports telling of how Boris Berezovsky submitted to the Litvinenko inquest (the inquest, not the inquiry) that British and Russian intelligence services were covering stuff up. (Litvinenko's widow is saying something very similar.) You can read articles by the BBC that supposedly give a background chronology to the Litvinenko affair that don't even mention Berezovsky.

Berezovsky was murdered before he could say any more.

He had Mossad bodyguards, by the way. His own inquest resulted in an open verdict.

There is a Spanish (possibly also Gibraltar) connection with Litvinenko.

Where did the polonium come from?

posted by b : 5:54 AM

Qatar wants to build a pipeline from their gas fields through Saudi Arabia to the Mediterranean Sea, but it needs to terminate in Syria. The Saudis want the passage fees. Israel wants to hook into a proposed Egyptian gas pipeline that would terminate in Syria. Israel wants to use the Egyptian pipeline to transport the natural gas they hope to steal from the Palestinian offshore gas fields. Assad is an obstacle to these aspirations.