x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended November 30, 2012

or

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 333-161943

SPORT ENDURANCE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada

26-2754069

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1890 South 3850 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84104

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(801) 673-5531

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller reporting company x

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: 60,200 (post-reverse split) shares of $0.001 par value common stock outstanding as of January 04, 2013.

This document contains “forward-looking statements”. All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including, but not limited to, any projections of earnings, revenue or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objections of management for future operations; any statements concerning proposed new services or developments; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.

Forward-looking statements may include the words “may,” “could,” “estimate,” “intend,” “continue,” “believe,” “expect” or “anticipate” or other similar words. These forward-looking statements present our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates on which they are made. Except for our ongoing securities laws, we do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update any forward-looking statement. Additionally, the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 most likely do not apply to our forward-looking statements as a result of being a penny stock issuer. You should, however, consult further disclosures we make in future filings of our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K.

Although we believe the expectations reflected in any of our forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in any of our forward-looking statements. Our future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to change and inherent risks and uncertainties.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

We file annual, quarterly and special reports and other information with the SEC that can be inspected and copied at the public reference facility maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549-0405. Information regarding the public reference facilities may be obtained from the SEC by telephoning 1-800-SEC-0330. The Company’s filings are also available through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering Analysis and Retrieval System which is publicly available through the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov). Copies of such materials may also be obtained by mail from the public reference section of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549-0405 at prescribed rates.

Sport Endurance, Inc. (“the Company”) was incorporated as Cayenne Construction, Inc. in the state of Nevada on January 3, 2001 (“Inception”). The Company was formed to be an independent service provider of ready-mix concrete, whereby management was to arrange purchases of ready-mixed concrete by small contractors and customers on a fee basis. The Company ceased operations in 2002 and was revived in 2009 with a name change to, “Sport Endurance, Inc.” on August 6, 2009. The Company intends to manufacture and distribute a line of sports energy drinks.

On October 31, 2012 the shareholders of the Company voted to increase the authorized common shares of the Company’s common stock from 480,000,000 authorized shares of common stock to 580,000,000 authorized shares of common stock. As a result of this vote, the Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation to reflect this change.

On November 23, 2012, we effected a 1,000 for 1 reverse stock split, decreasing the issued and outstanding shares common shares from 60,200,000 to 60,200 shares and decreasing the issued and outstanding preferred shares from 1,000,000 to 1,000. All share amounts throughout this report have been retroactively adjusted for all periods to reflect this stock split.

Basis of presentation

The unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2012. It is suggested that these interim condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the Form 10-K.

The Company has adopted a fiscal year end of August 31st.

Development Stage Company

The Company is considered to be in the development stage as defined by FASB ASC 915-10-05. This standard requires companies to report their operations, shareholders equity and cash flows from inception through the reporting date. The Company will continue to be reported as a development stage entity until, among other factors, revenues are generated from management’s intended operations. Management has provided financial data since inception (January 3, 2001).

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and equivalents include investments with initial maturities of three months or less. The Company maintains its cash balances at credit-worthy financial institutions that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") up to $250,000. Deposits with these banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits; however, these deposits typically may be redeemed upon demand and, therefore, bear minimal risk. The Company had cash and cash equivalents of $1 and $38 at November 30, 2012 and August 31, 2012.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires the establishment of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided to the extent deferred tax assets may not be recoverable after consideration of the future reversal of deferred tax liabilities, tax planning strategies, and projected future taxable income.

Under FASB ASC 820-10-05, the Financial Accounting Standards Board establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement reaffirms that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements as reflected herein. The carrying amounts of cash and accrued expenses reported on the balance sheet are estimated by management to approximate fair value primarily due to the short term nature of the instruments. The Company had no items that required fair value measurement on a recurring basis.

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

The basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss adjusted on an “as if converted” basis, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus potential dilutive securities. For the periods presented, there were no outstanding potential common stock equivalents and therefore basic and diluted earnings per share result in the same figure.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04. The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, “Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update)” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03. This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114. The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02. This update amends ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment and permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, “Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. This update defers the requirement to present items that are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income in both the statement of income where net income is presented and the statement where other comprehensive income is presented. The adoption of ASU 2011-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 “Balance Sheet: Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”). This Update requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS. The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on its results of operations or financial position.

Note 2 – Going Concern

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring net losses from operations resulting in an accumulated deficit of $242,086, and a working capital deficit of $73,282 as of November 30, 2012. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management is actively pursuing new ventures to increase revenues. In addition, the Company is currently seeking additional sources of capital to fund short term operations. The Company, however, is dependent upon its ability to secure equity and/or debt financing and there are no assurances that the Company will be successful, therefore, without sufficient financing it would be unlikely for the Company to continue as a going concern.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of any uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements also do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 3 – Related Party Transactions

From time to time the Company has received loans from the former CEO, Robert Timothy, to fund operations. The total outstanding balance of the unsecured, demand notes, bearing interest at 8% was $5,445 and $5,445 at November 30, 2012 and August 31, 2012, respectively. Accrued interest of $1,359 and $1,251 was outstanding as of November 30, 2012 and August 31, 2012, respectively.

From time to time the Company has received loans from the Company’s CEO, Gerald Ricks, to fund operations. The total outstanding balance of the unsecured, demand notes, bearing interest at 8% was $22,519 and $22,519 at November 30, 2012 and August 31, 2012, respectively. Accrued interest of $2,126 and $1,677 was outstanding as of November 30, 2012 and August 31, 2012, respectively.

From time to time the Company has received loans from a major shareholder, BK Consulting, to fund operations. The total outstanding balance of the unsecured, demand notes, bearing interest at 8% was $17,708 and $15,573 at November 30, 2012 and August 31, 2012. Accrued interest of $1,955 and $1,625 was outstanding as of November 30, 2012 and August 31, 2012, respectively.

Total amounts due to related parties were $45,672 and $43,537 at November 30, 2012 and August 31, 2012, respectively.

The Company has accrued interest of $5,440 and $4,551 to related parties as of November 30, 2012 and August 31, 2012, respectively.

Transactions

During the year ended August 31, 2012, the Company received unsecured loans of $4,433, due on demand, bearing interest at 8%, from the Company’s CEO, Gerald Ricks, to fund operations

During the year ended August 31, 2012, the Company received unsecured loans of $13,305, due on demand, bearing interest at 8%, from a major shareholder, BK Consulting, to fund operations.

On September 5, 2012 the Company received an unsecured loan of $400, due on demand, bearing interest at 8%, from a major shareholder, BK Consulting, to fund operations.

On September 21, 2012 the Company received an unsecured loan of $10, due on demand, bearing interest at 8%, from a major shareholder, BK Consulting, to fund operations.

On October 15, 2012 the Company received an unsecured loan of $25, due on demand, bearing interest at 8%, from a major shareholder, BK Consulting, to fund operations.

On October 25, 2012 the Company received an unsecured loan of $200, due on demand, bearing interest at 8%, from a major shareholder, BK Consulting, to fund operations.

On October 29, 2012 the Company received an unsecured loan of $1500, due on demand, bearing interest at 8%, from a major shareholder, BK Consulting, to fund operations.

Change in Management

On December 15, 2010, the former CEO, Robert Timothy, resigned as from the Board of Directors and his position as CEO, and appointed Gerald Ricks as the Chairman of the Board of Directors and CEO.

On December 30, 2010, the Board of Directors dismissed Ronald Schuurman as Secretary and Treasurer and appointed Vincent Kelly to the Board and positions of Secretary and Treasurer.

On December 31, 2010, the Board of Directors appointed James Hughes to the Board of Directors.

Depreciation expense totaled $1,048 and $1,048 for the three months ended November 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Note 5 – Stockholders’ Equity

On June 7, 2010, the shareholders of the Company voted to increase the authorized common shares of the Company’s common stock from 90,000,000 authorized shares of common stock to 480,000,000 authorized shares of common stock. Additionally, the shareholders voted to increase the authorized shares of the Company’s preferred stock from 10,000,000 authorized shares to 20,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock. As a result of this vote, the Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation to reflect this change.

On October 31, 2012 the shareholders of the Company voted to increase the authorized common shares of the Company’s common stock from 480,000,000 authorized shares of common stock to 580,000,000 authorized shares of common stock. As a result of this vote, the Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation to reflect this change.

On November 23, 2012, we effected a 1,000 for 1 reverse stock split, decreasing the issued and outstanding shares common shares from 60,200,000 to 60,200 shares and decreasing the issued and outstanding preferred shares from 1,000,000 to 1,000. All share amounts throughout this report have been retroactively adjusted for all periods to reflect this stock split.

Preferred stock

On August 15, 2009, the Company issued a total of 2,000 (post-reverse split) shares of preferred stock to two individual investors in a private placement under Rule 506 of the Securities Act of 1933 for $5,000 in cash, or $2.50 (post-reverse split) per share.

On October 12, 2010, a preferred stock shareholder elected to convert 1,000 (post-reverse split) shares of preferred stock in exchange for 3,000 (post-reverse split) shares of common stock.

The Company is authorized to issue 20,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value preferred stock as of November 30, 2012 and August 31, 2012. The Company has 1,000 (post-reverse split) shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding as of November 30, 2012 and August 31, 2012.

Common stock

As noted above, on October 12, 2010, a preferred stock shareholder elected to convert 1,000 (post-reverse split) shares of preferred stock in exchange for 3,000 (post-split) shares of common stock.

On August 20, 2009, the Company issued 8,980 (post-reverse split) founder’s shares of common stock in exchange for a subscription receivable of $8,980. The Company received proceeds of $8,980 at various dates between September 15, 2009 and May 13, 2010.

On August 20, 2009, the Company issued 25,340 (post-reverse split) founder’s shares of common stock in exchange for contributed equipment with a cost basis of $25,340. The cost basis approximated the fair market value of the equipment.

On August 20, 2009, the Company cancelled and returned to treasury 6,320 (post-reverse split) shares of common stock previously issued to founders. No consideration was provided and the total par value of $6,320 was recorded as additional paid-in capital.

On February 10, 2002, the Company issued 25,000 (post-reverse split) shares to the Company President for professional services rendered. The fair value of those shares was $125,000 on the grant date.

The Company issued a total of 3,000 (post-reverse split) shares of its $0.001 par value common stock during May 2001 in a private placement under Rule 506 of the Securities Act of 1933 for $15,000 in cash, or $5 (post-reverse split) per share to a total of nineteen individual investors. Due to a lack of operations, management believes the purchase price of $5 (post-reverse split) per share is representative of fair value.

On January 10, 2001 the Company issued 1,200 (post-reverse split) shares of common stock to the founder of the Company in exchange for proceeds of $500. Since the par value of the Company’s common stock is the legal minimum value, management recorded compensation for the difference between the amount paid of $500 and the minimum value of $1,200, or $700 in the accompanying statement of operations.

The Company is authorized to issue 580,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock as of November 30, 2012 and August 31, 2012. The Company has 60,200 and 60,200 (post-reverse split) shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of November 30, 2012 and August 31, 2012.

Note 6 – Subsequent Events

During the month ended December 31, 2012, the Company received unsecured loans of $3,955, due on demand, bearing interest at 8%, from a major shareholder, BK Consulting, to fund operations.

On January 7, 2013 the Company received a unsecured loan in the amount of $12, due on demand, bearing interest at 8%, from a major shareholder, BK Consulting, to fund operations.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK

Sport Endurance, Inc. (“Sport Endurance”) is a Nevada corporation that intends to manufacture and distribute a line of sports energy drinks. Production and distribution has not yet commenced, as such, the Company is considered to be in the development stage.

For the three months ended November 30, 2012, we had a net loss of $5,709 as compared to a net loss of $3,815 for the three months ended November 30, 2011. Our accumulated deficit as of November 30, 2012 was $242,068. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern over the next twelve months.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended November 30, 2012 and 2011

Revenues

The Company had no revenues during the three month periods ending November 30, 2012 and November 30, 2011.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses were $272 for the three months ended November 30, 2012 compared to $120 for the three months ended November 30, 2011, an increase of $152. The increase in general and administrative expense for the three months ended November 30, 2012 compared to November 30, 2011 was due primarily to an increase in stock servicing costs and bank service charges during the same period in 2012.

Professional fees

Professional fees were $3,500 for the three months ended November 30, 2012 compared to $2,000 for the three months ended November 30, 2011, an increase of $1,500. The increase in professional fees for the three months ended November 30, 2012 compared to November 30, 2011 was due primarily to increased accounting and legal fees.

Depreciation

Depreciation expense for the three months ended November 30, 2012 totaled $1,048 compared to $1,048 for the three months ended November 30, 2011. We anticipate our quarterly depreciation expense to continue to be $1,048 for the near term.

Interest expense

Interest expense for the three months ended November 30, 2012 was $889 compared to $647 for the three months ended November 30, 2011, an increase of $242.

Net loss

For the reasons above, our net loss for the three months ended November 30, 2012 was $5,709 compared to $3,815 for the three months ended November 30, 2011, an increase of $1,894 or approximately 50%.

The following table summarizes total current assets, liabilities and working capital at November 30, 2012 compared to August 31, 2012.

November 30,

2012

August 31,

2012

Current Assets

$

1

$

38

Current Liabilities

$

73,283

$

68,659

Working Capital (Deficit)

$

(73,282

)

$

(68,621

)

While we have raised capital to meet our working capital and financing needs in the past, additional financing is required in order to meet our current and projected cash flow deficits from operations and development of alternative revenue sources. As of November 30, 2012, we had a working capital deficit of $73,282. Our poor financial condition raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern and we have incurred losses since inception and may incur future losses. In the past, we have conducted private placements of equity shares and during the three months ended November 30, 2012 we did not receive any proceeds from private placements. During three months ended November 30, 2012, we received a total of $2,135 in unsecured loans due on demand, bearing interest at 8%, from related parties. There is no guarantee that the related parties will be willing to commit any further loans to the Company at this time.

Should we not be able to continue to secure additional financing when needed, we may be required to slow down or suspend our growth or reduce the scope of our current operations, any of which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the development of our line of sport energy drinks; the cost and availability of third-party financing for development; and administrative and legal expenses.

We anticipate that we will incur operating losses in the next twelve months. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in their early stage of development. Such risks for us include, but are not limited to, an evolving and unpredictable business model; recognition of revenue sources; and the management of growth. To address these risks, we must, among other things, expand our customer base, implement and successfully execute our business and marketing strategy, respond to competitive developments, and attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in addressing such risks, and the failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Satisfaction of our cash obligations for the next 12 months.

As of November 30, 2012, our cash balance was $1. Our plan for satisfying our cash requirements for the next twelve months is through sales-generated income, sale of shares of our common stock, third party financing, and/or traditional bank financing. We anticipate sales-generated income during that same period of time, but do not anticipate generating sufficient amounts of revenues to meet our working capital requirements. Consequently, we intend to make appropriate plans to secure sources of additional capital in the future to fund growth and expansion through additional equity or debt financing or credit facilities.

Going concern.

Our financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern, which contemplate the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have incurred continuous losses from operations, have an accumulated deficit of $242,086 and a working capital deficit of $73,282 at November 30, 2012, and have reported negative cash flows from operations since inception. In addition, we do not currently have the cash resources to meet our operating commitments for the next twelve months. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, and complications frequently encountered by entrance into established markets and the competitive nature in which we operate.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to generate sufficient cash from operations to meet our cash needs and/or to raise funds to finance ongoing operations and repay debt. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be successful in our efforts to raise additional debt or equity capital and/or that our cash generated by our future operations will be adequate to meet our needs. These factors, among others, indicate that we may be unable to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.

Summary of product and research and development that we will perform for the term of our plan.

We are not anticipating significant research and development expenditures in the near future.

Expected purchase or sale of plant and significant equipment.

We do not anticipate the purchase or sale of any plant or significant equipment as such items are not required by us at this time.

Significant changes in the number of employees.

As of November 30, 2012, we had no employees, other than our non-paid CEO, Gerald Ricks, who replaced Robert Timothy, who resigned on December 15, 2010. Currently, there are no organized labor agreements or union agreements and we do not anticipate any in the future.

Assuming we are able to pursue revenue through the commencement of sales of our sports energy drinks, we anticipate an increase of personnel and may need to hire employees. In the interim, we intend to use the services of independent consultants and contractors to perform various professional services when appropriate. We believe the use of third-party service providers may enhance our ability to control general and administrative expenses and operate efficiently.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results or operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In October 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04. The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, “Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update)” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03. This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114. The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02. This update amends ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment and permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, “Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. This update defers the requirement to present items that are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income in both the statement of income where net income is presented and the statement where other comprehensive income is presented. The adoption of ASU 2011-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 “Balance Sheet: Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”). This Update requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS. The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on its results of operations or financial position.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, among other things, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Gerald Ricks, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation, Mr. Ricks concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to us that is required to be included in our periodic SEC filings and ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief financial officer, or person performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, for the following reasons:

●

The Company does not have an independent board of directors or audit committee or adequate segregation of duties;

●

All of our financial reporting is carried out by our financial consultant;

●

We do not have an independent body to oversee our internal controls over financial reporting and lack segregation of duties due to the limited nature and resources of the Company.

We plan to rectify these weaknesses by implementing an independent board of directors and hiring additional accounting personnel once we have additional resources to do so.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

We know of no material pending legal proceedings to which our company or subsidiary is a party or of which any of their property is the subject. In addition, we do not know of any such proceedings contemplated by any governmental authorities.

We know of no material proceedings in which any director, officer or affiliate of our company, or any registered or beneficial stockholder of our company, or any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate, or stockholder is a party adverse to our company or subsidiary or has a material interest adverse to our company or subsidiary.