Letter: Don't ban our means of defense

Since your life could be threatened by an act of violence, common sense says it is only reasonable to protect your life from an act of violence. However, attacks by crazed individuals, bent on homicidal acts aimed at unprotected innocents, are condemned in a cacophony of circular reasoning.

And, similar to a pack of yapping lap dogs, members of the Obama administration have entered the raucous tail chase. Not to condemn the attackers, but only their means of inflicting death. The purveyors of this particular philosophy of blame hold that the prohibition of gun ownership will provide for our protection. Might they be mistaken?

Would the prohibition of alcohol provide greater sobriety? Could we cite the use of matches in order to curtail the commission of arson? And in the cataclysmic corruption of all common sense, the most immaculate of the unprotected innocent are aborted for the sake of convenience.