Republican Kansas Governor Sam Brownback signed a bill aimed at keeping
state courts and agencies from using Islamic or other non-U.S. laws when
making decisions, his office said on Friday.

The law has been dubbed the "sharia bill" because critics say it
targets the Islamic legal code. Sharia, or Islamic law, covers all
aspects of Muslim life, including religious obligations and financial
dealings. Opponents of state bans say they could nullify wills or legal
contracts between Muslims.

Supporters said the law will reassure foreigners in Kansas that state
laws and the U.S. Constitution would protect them. Opponents said it
singled out Muslims for ridicule and was unnecessary because American
laws prevail on U.S. soil.

I don't want to talk you out of it. You're entitled to your opinion. I can't disprove God, which is not surprising. I can't disprove any mythical being. We might have had unicorns, and inubuses, and flying monkeys. We might have hobits and dragons and ice-giants. All of the gods and titans may have been real too. But in the absence of ANY evidence that they did exist, I assume that they did not. Same is true of your god. We don't generally assume that something existed, even though there is no evidence that it did. In fact, I honestly can't think of anything we believe in without some evidence that it's real, except God.
So you may feel free to believe. But the above explains why I don't. I don't believe the world was created. I believe that in one form or another, it always existed, but was shaped by infinite time floating around the universe, until it was caught in the orbit of a small yellow star, which we know as the sun. I find that much more plausible than the idea that a perfect, all-powerful, all-knowing being created it. And if he did, as George Carlin said: I am not impressed. Earthquakes, famine, disease, war, strife, hurricanes, and tornados; this is pretty shoddy craftsmanship. Quoting Carlin again "this is the work of an office temp with a bad attitude".

A man and a woman had sex. The sperm of the man, fertilized the egg of the woman, thus forming inside of the egg: a zygote. That zygote grew and developed into a fetus. The fetus developed human characteristics such as fingers, eyes, and a digestive track (which would later become the bain of his parents existance).
After a little over 9 months, the fetus had grown to a point that the woman could no longer keep it inside of her, and her reproductive system caused the muscles inside of her womb to contract, thus pushing the fetus out of her vagina, at which point, the fetus graduates to the title of "baby".
This is fun. Shall we try a reptile next, or a bird?

This is America and everyone should abide by and be protected by our laws.

As for the critics of the bill who think "it singled out Muslims for ridicule and was unnecessary because American laws prevail on U.S. soil."... all I can say is you missed a BIG Sharia law for Muslims rally in Connecticut.

How? Sharia can't be used in the USA anyway, because of the First Amendment. This is nothing but a waste of tax-dollars and time, to pass a redundant law which demonizes American Muslims; most of whom don't support Sharia law anyway.

One question: if we make exception for Islam, then we must make exceptions for all other religions/cults/isms. We are a nation of laws and everyone, no exception, are subject to them. If a certain group feels that they should be exempted, then that group has no intention of assimilating into the U.S. culture. More to the point, they feel that everyone else should assimilate to their culture. If there are two sets of laws, Islamic and other, then honor killings would not be murder, wife beating would not be illegal, and neither would polygamy (only if you are Muslim though). All people here should know what the nation's principles and laws are and if we get into the habit of making exceptions to the law, then we have no law, just chaos and anarchy.