FSIN, Sask. government failing to provide leadership on Sixties ScoopBack to video

Perhaps it’s just coincidental that Eyre’s initial comment (combined with her grudging reluctance to actually apologize) played like a dog whistle to the base.

Perhaps there was some plausible reason why none of the Sask. Party leadership candidates (nor even Premier Brad Wall, who nurtured the idea of a treaty education-First Nations curriculum on our schools) didn’t get that Eyre’s words were causing irreparable damage to this ever-struggling government’s relationship with First Nations.

Credit Wall and his government for taking a big step forward in 2012 by implementing a nation-leading First Nations curriculum — one that Wall acknowledged in a scrum Wednesday was difficult to implement because of resistance from his own Sask. Party base that was somehow offended history could be be taught from something other than the white, immigrant perspective that Eyre was clearly promoting in her Nov. 1 speech.

Advertisement

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content continued

But the government took a big step backward because it took a public outing by one of Eyre’s kid’s Grade 8 classmates, a provincewide petition calling for the education minister’s resignation, umpteen questions in the assembly and multiple scrums in the Legislative Building rotunda before we finally heard Eyre grudgingly admit there is no equivalency between the white immigrant and First Nations experience.

The second big step backward of late emerged out of the potential Sixties Scoop apology, but this incident shows it’s not always the government’s fault this relationship has been like it is.

Advertisement

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content continued

Clearly, there is provincial government fault because it was the Ross Thatcher Liberal and Allan Blakeney NDP governments that presided over social services policy of the Adopt Indian and Metis (AIM) program from 1966 to 1975 that displaced babies from their homes and communities for adoption to white homes in Saskatchewan and Canada and as far away as the United States and Europe.

Sadly, this was considered national best practice half a century ago. Fifty years later, history shows what this policy has really produced is an apology from the current Liberal federal government and a massive payout from Ottawa of $800 million to victims.

Advertisement

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content continued

A similar apology is required from the current leader of the Saskatchewan government for its contribution to this past wrong — something Wall has repeatedly offered to do, but has been unable to do, his government has said, because of scheduling difficulties. One can certainly argue more than an apology is needed. The best solution might now be far greater support from the provincial government for First Nation and Metis education and foster/childcare programs overseen by First Nations.

But what is the Federation of Sovereign Indigenous Nations (FSIN) asking for?

Well, after balking at attending any apology event, Chief Bobby Cameron has now written the FSIN wants $200 million to $400 million from the province.

Advertisement

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content continued

His justification is that there has be “substance to the apology” because without money it would be like saying Merry Christmas without giving a present.

“You (the province) are already in a deficit, you might as well fix the wrongs while you are there,” Cameron said.

Rightly, Wall is now saying no to any financial commitment — especially, such a nebulous one that doesn’t seem to be tied to anything nor even addresses pertinent issues like Metis children left out of the federal settlement or what would be the best path to addressing ongoing issues.

Really, it sounds like a cash grab — the very thing that frustrates so many with how First Nations leadership conducts itself in this relationship.

We can do better. We have to do better or we will keep going backward.

Share this article in your social network

Share this Story: FSIN, Sask. government failing to provide leadership on Sixties Scoop

Trending

Related Stories

This Week in Flyers

Article Comments

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Notice for the Postmedia Network

This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.