Charles Howell III
2001 PGA Tour Rookie of the Year
“I’ve been wearing my Q-Link now for four years and I absolutely know that Q-Link will help you and everybody else out there with their golf games.”

Tommy Armour III
PGA Tour Winner
“I can really feel the benefits of the Q-Link system, I feel more control and composed in pressure situations and that helped get back the feeling I could go out and win tournaments again.”

Lee Janzen
Two-Time U.S. Open Champion, Two-Time U.S. Ryder Cup Team Member
“I wear Q-Link because I don’t want to leave anything to chance on the course. I like to have a competitive edge while I play and Q-Link provides exactly what I need.”

Tom Pernice, Jr.
PGA Tour Winner
“The Q-Link’s been wonderful for me. It’s really helped me relax and focus much better on the golf course. I don’t get nearly as uptight as I did before. All in all, it’s a magical product. I’m amazed. I’m loving it so far.”

An Australian study found that mice exposed to pulsed digital mobile phone radiation over 18 months had twice the risk of developing cancers. An American study found that learning and short term memory were impaired after 45 minutes exposure to electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones in rats. And other studies of electromagnetic radiation on pregnant mice suggest that high exposure to mobile phones can affect intra-uterine development, confirmed recently in chicks (double birth defects, see below). The effects of mobile phone radiation in human embryo development are unknown.

Meanwhile, The European Union is drawing up guidelines for electromagnetic radiation exposure of all types.

Celphone.gif (12018 bytes)Mobile phones vary on radiation dosage: Following figures are for European mobile phones in SARS (watts of radiation from mobile phones per kg of brain), antenna extended / retracted. Safety is 10 watts/kg. Lowest radiation levels from phones with hidden antennae or ones extended away from head. Below that are SAR levels for US mobile phones. Note that there are different figures for SAR levels around for the same mobile phones, I suspect because some are official company data, and others independent lab measurements and that there may be other variables according to the exact conditions. For example the first table below shows big SAR phone radiation differences depending on the position of the aerial.