My aim is to offer insights into some of the more subtle principles underpinning prints. The commentary is based on thirty-eight years of teaching and the prints and other collectables that I am focusing on are those which I have acquired over the years.
In the galleries of prints (accessed by clicking the links immediately below) I am also adding fresh images offered for sale. If you get lost in the maze of links, simply click the "home" button to return to the blog discussions.

Monday, 21 May 2018

(upper image) “Cicada on Lotus,” 1890, from the series of 86
woodblock prints, “Seitei kacho gafu 省亭花鳥画譜 (Seitei's
Bird-and-Flower Painting Manual)”, published in 1890 by Ogura Shoten. Two
separate colour woodblock panels glued together as a single image (i.e. two
prints joined as a single sheet), 24.8 x 31 cm.

(lower image) “Butterfly on Hydrangea,” 1890, from the series of
86 woodblock prints, “Seitei kacho gafu 省亭花鳥画譜 (Seitei's Bird-and-Flower Painting
Manual)”, volume 2, published in 1890 by Ogura Shoten. Two separate colour woodblock panels glued
together as a single image (i.e. two prints joined as a single sheet), 22.9 x
31.1 cm.

Brown, Louise Norton, “Block Printing and Book Illustration in
Japan”, London and New York, 1924, p. 202.

Mitchell, C H, with the assistance of Ueda, Osamu,”The Illustrated
Books of the Nanga, Maruyama, Shijo and Other Related Schools of Japan. A
Biobibliography”, Los Angeles, 1972, p. 466.

Toda, Kenji, “Descriptive Catalogue of the Japanese and Chinese
Illustrated Books in the Ryerson Library of the Art Institute of Chicago”,
Chicago, 1931, p. 427.

Condition: Beautifully delicate impressions in pristine condition
for their age (note that each sheet consists of two separate plates that have
been joined/glued perfectly).

I am selling this pair of extraordinary prints by a true master of
the Japanese woodblock tradition for a total cost of AU$260 (currently
US$195.33/EUR166.52/GBP145.63 at the time of this listing) including postage
and handling to anywhere in the world.

If you are interested in purchasing these original woodblock
prints please contact me (oz_jim@printsandprinciples.com) and I will send you a
PayPal invoice to make the payment easy.

Watanabe Shōtei has the distinction of being one of the first
Nihonga artists (i.e. a traditional Japanese artist) to travel to Europe in the
nineteenth century. Not only did he visit Europe, but in France he was awarded
a bronze medal at the 1878 International Exhibition. Beyond this remarkable
achievement of long distance travel, he is also famous for revitalising kachoga
(bird-and-flower images) by introducing realistic visual devices of Western art
into the comparatively flat planes, high-key tones and delicate colours of the
Maruyama-Shijo School.

Regarding the difference between Occidental and Oriental ways of
looking at art that Watanabe Shōtei attempted to merge, I’ve just started
reading a book that I just can’t put down—except when the cook has made
something tasty—that touches upon this particular issue: Claire Roberts’
(2010), “Friendship in Art: Fou Lei and Huang Binhong.” In this book Roberts
offers insights into what she describes as the “gaping chasm” between the two
cultures. Roberts summaries the Chinese artistic outlook—which for the sake of
expedience I wish to include the Japanese way of looking—by proposing that
Chinese art “places a primacy on the spirit”, and compares this to “modern
Western art, which endlessly seeks sensuality and the beauty of abstraction
through shape and colour” (p. 44).

Like any brief crystallisation of ideas about culture, there are
significant oversights in Roberts' very succinct appraisal of cultural
differences, especially when I wish to link these concepts with the cultural
differences that Watanabe helped to bridge. Nevertheless, Roberts' idea that
the essential cultural difference is between “spirit” and “sensuality” is
fascinating to contemplate in terms of these prints. (My apologies to Claire
Roberts if I have misinterpreted this aspect of her wonderful book. Sadly, I’m
the sort of chap who can watch a movie and on recounting what it was all about
finds out that he alone perceived the movie that way … weird!)