I think it's great you found SF. Contrary to some opinions in this thread, I think that while Wikipedia is certainly subject to political correctness, it's a great site for getting a quick look or overview of a subject. There are many people who add to it to make it a mammoth repository of information - even if some of it is "filtered."

How many other WN sites are there these days? What other facts should people know about SF? If someone has the time, knowledge, and courage, I suggest he/she add to the article in a bland, almost "PC" way to allow people to find other sites of interest, and may learn a bit more of SF activities. Not in an obvious or opinionated way. That way, others like FimS can learn and find their ways here.

The SPLCenter.org site used to have a wonderful one-page listing of "hate" groups that was a really good resource to find like-minded sites. I don't see it anymore - maybe they wised up.

According to Samuel P. Huntington, the modern movement is increasingly cultured, intellectual and academically trained.[8] Rather than espouse violence, they use statistics and social science data to argue for a self-conscious white identity.

According to Samuel P. Huntington, the modern movement is increasingly cultured, intellectual and academically trained.[8] Rather than espouse violence, they use statistics and social science data to argue for a self-conscious white identity.

Yeah, I find the article about White Nationalism quite unbiased. In fact I am impressed with that. I remember it was quite different some time ago. It all depends on who edits the article, some Jew might change it throughoutly tomorrow and it won't be unbiased any longer. We could try to edit the article about stormfront but if we fight on that too much, the edition will be blocked...

In May 2003, Fox News Channel host Bill O'Reilly reported on a segregated prom being held in Georgia and posted a poll on his website asking his viewers if they would send their own kids to one. A link to the poll was posted on Stormfront and messages subsequently posted there implied that a mass of readers had duly voted in order to skew the poll in favor of segregation. O'Reilly reported this the following week and refused to read the final results due to this, citing Stormfront as the culprit by name and referring to it as a "Neo-Nazi organization."

LOL people voted and they didn't want to release the count. Must of really surprized them that more than 50% said yes. Is this not a tatic they do also? They bus people in from all over the country to protest the the jena six( http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/28/opinion/l28jena.html ) verdict filling a small town of 3000 with 50,000 blacks. All paid for by black actors and theythoughttheycouldsing rappers. Thats no where near the best article on it. But as other articles said people closed their shops and left town leaving the protesters without suffienant places to urinate. Im sure the 50,000 people pissed and took a dump in every crack of that town and they need to tear it down and rebuild.(lol)

They like claiming the jury that convicted them was racist but the court said that none of the black citezens of the town summoned for jury duty showed up leaving it an all white jury. The town was 10% black and the young men all have been in trouble with law enforcement before.

The kid sentenced to the most time punched a girl in the face for no reason not long before these charges.

WHITE PRIDEWhite pride is a slogan used primarily in the United States to promote the heritage of persons of whiteEuropeanracial identity. Organizations advocating white pride tend to be collectively referred to as the white pride movement, and are often closely aligned with WHITE SUPREMACY, white separatism, and other extreme manifestations of white RACISM.

Interestingly enough I had some sort of ban placed on me for citing things from Mein Kampf. I have a specially older edition that came out before many known events took place and it has several historical notes inside not found in today's editions. I guess the (liberal) powers that be cannot handle something they've never bothered to read? I also note that like the Black v. White this reflects in the use of Marx v. Hitler in likewise tone and citation. Try to find as many citations from Hitler and compare this to those by Marx and note the tilt.

Yeah, I find the article about White Nationalism quite unbiased. In fact I am impressed with that. I remember it was quite different some time ago. It all depends on who edits the article, some Jew might change it throughoutly tomorrow and it won't be unbiased any longer. We could try to edit the article about stormfront but if we fight on that too much, the edition will be blocked...

True, but we should still "fight" and try to interject the contrasting (honest) side of the coin. We must never say "oh well" and simply submit. That's one reason why I had hoped the Stormfront wiki would take off. Sadly it appears to not be going anywhere. However, if (IF) that means that there are efforts going elsewhere, out in the "real" world, which is more important than a stupid computer, then that's an acceptable compromise. People don't need a website or a wiki to tell them what their own common sense and inherent racial pride would tell them (assuming they possess either).