[Your newsletter author has reversed this saying into Believing
is seeing to convey the idea that we filter information to reinforce our prejudice.]

Slogans are Lies in Camouflage

[I first came to suspect slogans when reading the clever repartee
of the greatest conversationalist of the last century, Oscar Wilde. I remember, as a
youth, analyzing some of the clever paradoxes which bounded out of him endlessly and
realized, after awhile, that they all contained an element of truth but were misleading in
substance. As I grew older, I came to realize that this statement is true for all
slogans.]

An ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure

[This seems to be a lure to the unwary who might buy into what
they do not need and, when habituated to this approach, to what might be harmful to them.]

After these cynical tidbits, let us look at the contemporary
scene of Vaccination. Readers will know that this newsletter makes no apologies for
raising controversy. The vast flow of information on the subject deals only with the
positive. Accordingly, this is an attempt to address the balance. I will, however, make a
few comments about what I consider to be the beneficent effect of certain vaccines.

The first vaccination

Smallpox was prevalent in England for over 200 years before
Edward Jenner (1749-1823). Born in Berkeley in Gloucestershire, England, he is one of the
most admirable figures in the history of medicine. It was sometimes said that he was lazy
and of only fair intelligence. This view came from the sophisticated doctors of London who
underestimated the honest countryman that he remained all his life. He believed simple
people. From his boyhood, Jenner was determined to become a doctor. At the age of 13, he
became a surgeon's assistant near Bristol where he remained for a period of six years.

One day, a young countrywoman came to the surgery and the
conversation turned to the subject of smallpox. She said, "I cannot take that
disease, for I have had cowpox." This phrase impressed itself on Jenner, who observed
its truth in his practice among farmers and their families. When he was 21, he went to
London where he became the pupil and friend of the celebrated Scot surgeon, John Hunter
(1728-1793), founder of Pathological Anatomy in England, inventor of a method of ligating
aneurysms, and creator of an anatomical museum.

Hunter's contribution to science, and his own personal
experience, are emblematic of the problems of vaccination, and it is perhaps an irony of
history that Jenner, his most celebrated pupil, should rightly be regarded as the father
of immunization, while Hunter's heroism is viewed as mere foolhardiness. Hunter was not an
academic but a fervid and intelligent experimenter who became the victim of one of his own
experiments. In an attempt to learn if gonorrhea and syphilis were two different diseases,
or merely two forms of the same disease, he inoculated himself with pus from a patient. As
luck would have it, he had chosen a patient infected with both conditions. This
circumstance led him to state erroneously that gonorrhea and syphilis were one and the
same and that they produced syphilitic aortic aneurysms; in fact, John Hunter died from
such an aneurysm.

After a two-year sojourn with Hunter in London, Jenner returned
to Berkeley. In Gloucestershire, it had long been common knowledge that milkmaids who
caught cowpox were immune to smallpox.1 This must have been known the length and breadth
of England amongst the common people. It was, however, not received opinion among the
learned.

Perhaps Jenner's bravery is similar to that of Galileo Galilei.
Jenner took the information, which was common knowledge amongst the lay, into science,
while Galileo simply expanded his new ideas in the vernacular. Does humanity have a common
heritage and a common destiny, or are we stratified into classes? This stratification is
not always admitted; more on this later. When Louis Pasteur took-up vaccination on the
basis of Jenner's work, he attempted to modulate the virus of rabies to induce
immunization. This was probably successful. From these observations sprang the profession
of Immunology. Let us briefly look, however, at two unstated aspects of the original
discovery. Though smallpox decimated city dwellers, immunity was commonplace amongst
country folk. Whence came smallpox in antiquity? History does not tell us; however, the
relationship of disease to the host raises fundamental questions about biology and
evolution. Putting it the other way around, if you were to assume that received opinion on
evolution as it now stands is erroneous, if you were to assume that life on Earth is an
holistic cooperative milieu, we might come to consider the relationship of health and
disease, of host and parasite, in a new light. You see, our thinking has been so
conditioned by the Hobbsian concept of 'the fight of all against all,' modulated by
Herbert Spencer and Charles Darwin2 into the ideas of natural selection, that we do not
often contemplate the questions and paradoxes from another point of view. This newsletter
is making such an attempt.

Other vaccinations : Whooping cough

Pertussis, or whooping cough, used to be a very serious disease,
especially for young girls and infants below the age of one year.3 The reason was not only
the exhausting paroxysmal coughing but also its duration. The Chinese and Japanese call it
The 100 day disease.

In the 1940s, treatment consisted of the administration of
Sulfonamide and convalescent, or hyperimmune human or rabbit serum globulin. It is well
known, and less publicized, that a change of air was widely used as a quite effective
treatment. One of the causative organisms, Bordetella pertussis, is remarkably sensitive
to changes in composition and temperature of air, and to changes in altitude; however, it
is quite understandable that many saw a need for effective prophylaxis, so doctors and
researchers looked for an effective vaccine.

The vaccine arrived first in the 1940s. Between 1942 and 1944,
controlled trials were conducted in Oxford City, England in children attending welfare
clinics and day nurseries. McFarland, et. al.,4 1945, published results of these trials.
The results were most unimpressive (55% versus 63% in a cohort of 327). Other studies,
which followed, also showed mixed but overall unimpressive results. Nonetheless, Pertussis
vaccine has become the standard of care throughout the civilized world, based on this
English (and subsequently Anglo-American) dominance.5,6

It took until 1979, when at least one country (Sweden), rejected
the use of Pertussis vaccine; it was ineffective, nay, it was harmful.7,8 What is
particularly interesting is that follow-up of the incidence of whooping cough in Sweden,
after the vaccine was stopped (we now have almost 20 years of information), showed no
worsening of their fate in that regard. There has been a whole, and impressive, study
written on the lack of correlation between the incidence of disease and the relevant
vaccination.9

In any case a whole series of mysterious epidemics have been
recorded, which have seemingly disappeared.10 One erstwhile medical heretic has questioned
the association with brain damage in particular,11 based on some solid research.12 One
must admit that, in the case of Pertussis, a number of fundamental questions remain
unanswered. Is the clinical disease whooping cough always due to the Bordetella pertussis
bacterium? Or to Pertussis Type B? In some instances, viruses have been identified, and it
is possible that the vaccine is effective against the bacterial cases and not the viral
ones.

In recent times, there have been strong suggestions that a
tendency to respiratory disease is induced by vaccination.13 The increasing incidence of
asthma, and deaths from asthma in the civilized world, are undoubted. It has been
correlated objectively with the incidence of chest physicians in the communities. This is
an excellent example where coincidence does not reflect cause and effect (at least we hope
not), but it does raise the possibility that medical intervention in general may have
delayed unfavorable effects.

This is one of the many problems with the modern research
paradigm. For practical and financial reasons, research projects are short-term. Long-term
follow-up is simply not available for controlled experiments in large groups. It is
undeniable, however, that a stimulus to the immune system will last the individual's life.
It is, therefore, one proposition of this article that the probable, and at least
occasional, harm from vaccination is ignored because of our habit of conducting research
in a stylized form which rejects individual case studies, rejects anecdotal reports, and
excludes long-term follow-up.

This is not to say that controlled studies are bad; it is merely
a comment on one of their limitations. We should keep an open mind, therefore, to the
criticism of the lay public and to serious accounts of anecdotal problems. At the end of
this article, you will find extensive source material on some of the organized and
responsible critiques from the lay public under Additional Resources.14 Some of the
references in this article stem from these sources. It is my proposal that this material
collectively should be taken very seriously by the medical profession if we are to
maintain our responsibility to our patients/customers, the Hippocratic Oath. We have held
honored this oath for 2.5 millennia, and we should not abandon it now with slogans such as
The scientific method, or on the basis of the official organizations because they lack
outside validation. These include The Centers for Disease Control (CDC), and the Advisory
Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).15

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)

I have frequently observed that great discoveries almost
invariably come from outside the profession they concern. All of us in the medical
profession have been alarmed and concerned about the increasing incidence of sudden infant
deaths in recent decades. The realization of this phenomenon has crept upon the profession
of pediatrics only gradually after a lot of initial denial. The scenario is usually that
of an infant found dead in its crib for no apparent reason.16 It was, therefore, with
amazement and delight that I read an explanation which, if we believe the writer (and I
do), is best summarized in her own words:

"On 12 October 1985, my life changed profoundly. [She goes
on to an explanation of the development of a monitoring system for babies' breathing and
came to the realization that with the use of this device by volunteer parents, an altered
pattern of breathing occurs before the sudden death (shallow breathing).] We also learned,
from parents who monitored a subsequent child after a cot death, that most commonly the
previous child had died after DPT injection. [DPT stands for Diphtheria, Pertussis,
Tetanus vaccination - ed.] We realized that a great number of cot deaths follows DPT
injections, and we felt that we had to address the issue. However, when we approached a
few pediatricians with this observation and conclusion, we realized that we had touched a
very sensitive, contentious issue. Once again, we were forced to start our own research
for the truth."17

The book, which this writer strongly recommends to interested
parents, goes on to describe this woman's research (from a skeptic's point of view) into
the use and abuse of vaccines, interestingly entering into the subject from an unbiased
perspective that of an intelligentobserver from outside the profession. Scheibner makes
many intelligent comments based on her research of the literature, most of it alarming.
She, and others,18,19 had already raised, in the two decades earlier, serious questions
about vaccines.Unfortunately, questions have been raised about all vaccines. To get a
detailed account of the critiques, readers will want to refer to the cited material.
Suffice it, for the purpose of this article, to encapsulate some of their concerns.

Measles vaccine is associated with central nervous system immune
problems.20 The mumps vaccine seems probably to be barely effective, if at all, in
preventing the disease, and might have increased the attack rate. There were some reports
of serious neurological sequelae probably associated with the vaccine. Rubella vaccination
has developed a similar reputation,21 although it is generally believed that preventing
acute rubella in pregnant women, particularly in the first trimester, is strongly
protective against congenital abnormalities of the fetus. Tetanus vaccine (a bacterial
illness provoked by the exotoxin of the bacillus) is undoubtedly one of the best examples
of an immensely effective vaccine. What is interesting, here, is that it is the vaccine
against the toxin, not the bacterium. Influenza vaccination, although promoted extensively
by the authorities, is probably ineffectual (I base this on 20 years of personal
experience as a provider of this vaccine) and certainly has been associated with nasty
neurologic complications such as Guillian-Barrè syndrome.

The incidence of polio declined before the advent of the
vaccine22 and rose again after the introduction of the Salk vaccine itself.23,24 It has
been suggested that the Pertussis vaccine, or at least the DPT vaccine, might have somehow
provoked the polio epidemic.25 Hill [vide infra] wrote, "Early in the epidemic,
attention was directed to a few patients who had been given an injection of Pertussis
vaccine, or of a mixture of Diphtheria toxoid and Pertussis vaccine, shortly before the
onset of their symptoms.26 The parents of these children were naturally inclined to blame
the inoculations for the development of the disease, though their medical attendants
either dismissed the probability of any causal relationship, or else considered the effect
to be due to a radiculitis caused by the vaccine. Considerable evidence, however, will be
presented to show that such an association has existed in this epidemic."

Hill, the famous British statisticians (best known for their
research on the relationship between smoking and lung cancer) wrote, "This paralysis
has sometimes been limited to the limbs in which the injection was made." Sometimes
it has involved other limbs, as well In most cases the diagnosis of poliomyelitis was made
in commenting on the sporadic illnesses seemingly provoked by the Pertussis vaccine. The
polio virus was isolated from the stool of some of these children, as well. Scheibner
details much more information than this.

Unfortunately, these early reports are but the tip of rather an
unpleasant iceberg. Two separate epidemiological studies have shown a high correlation
between the spread of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) with both vaccination
against polio and vaccination against smallpox.27,28 The connection with smallpox emerged
first from the research of an internist in Hollywood, Dr. Ropbert Strecker, who came upon
this information tangentially. He and his (attorney) brother were looking at the
possibility of forming a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) and he, at the time, as a
practicing internist and a gastroenterologist, found himself in the midst of the AIDS
epidemic in Southern California's homosexual capital.

Some of Strecker's information is outdated, but a revisionist
writer and reporter has recently published a book, established a web page, and lectures
widely on the subject. This is perhaps the best source of information, although readers
would do well to verify data for themselves.29 The relationship to the polio vaccine was
hypothesized also by a worker from outside medicine. It goes without saying, that the
medical establishment has roundly rejected this very logical analysis. It was however,
published.30 Are these merely scare stories? What is in the vaccine? How is it produced?
Is it possible for a vaccine to be contaminated? Alas, the answers to these three
questions are not favorable. Vaccines are grown in living tissue. Some of them are
produced by harvesting serum from the scarified skin of domestic animals, such as horses
and cattle. Others are harvested from tissue cultures, often using monkey kidney cell
lines.

There are a number of problems with maintaining live cells in
tissue cultures. The technology of tissue culture limits the options in the production
line. The transfer of these cells between laboratories is promiscuous. What is in the
genetic material of these cells? Why do they behave differently from ordinary cells? After
all, ordinary cells do not allow themselves to be maintained indefinitely in tissue
culture. This is similar to the difference between the organization and senescence of
cells in an intact body, on the one hand, and malignancies on the other.

I do not know the answer to the question implied, that there is a
malignant characteristic of these cells. It remains a truism, however, that these cells
are widely contaminated with various viral species, some of which have been identified;
for instance, SV40 (this stands for Simian Virus 40)31,32 putatively, a harmless
passenger. First of all, I am insecure with the statement that it is harmless and,
secondly, it may merely be a representative of a series of contaminant viruses, not all of
which have been identified. Undoubtedly, the individuals who have been vaccinated, with
vaccines such as the polio vaccine, have been subjected to these other supposedly benign
viruses in the 'bargain.' It has been suggested, for instance, that the present epidemic
of chronic fatigue syndrome is merely polio in a new dress.33 The humanitarian attempt by
Rotary International to eradicate polio world-wide by vaccinating the children of the
world may, alas, and accordingly, represent a disaster waiting in the wings.34

Turning point

If, therefore, vaccination is at best a mixed blessing and at
worst a harmful interference with the biology of our species, how does that square with
received opinion? It does not. Here, we need to take a step back and look at the concept
species.

What is a species?

Linneaus classified organisms according to their complexity when
he rearranged them on the shelves of The Natural Museum of History of Stockholm, Sweden.
Carlous Linneaus (1707-1778), published in Systema Naturae. This information was
attractive to Charles Darwin when he speculated on the origin of the species in his famous
The Origin of the Species, 1859.

You see how the term species crept in without a very clear
definition. It was later stated that a species is a cluster of creatures or plants which
can reproduce amongst themselves. Thus, for instance, Homo sapiens is a species because
inter-racial breeding is possible. Contrariwise, it is assumed that horses and donkeys are
not of a uniform species because their off-spring, the mule, is itself infertile; but you
see how the existence of the mule is something of an intermediate state.

Problems akin to this have plagued the concept of species from
its inception. When dealing with small so-called primitive organisms, the facility for
demarcation between species diminishes markedly.

There are at least two reasons for this. In multi-cellular
creatures and plants, the definition of species is based primarily on their anatomy. The
appearance of microorganisms is less consistent. Although Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur
held the view that species of bacteria have one form only, all microbiologists have the
experience of variations in forms in every bacteriological laboratory. These are sometimes
dismissed as inconveniences, irregularities in the growth of the cultures due to
variations in the medium, or to laboratory error. Nonetheless, these variations are common
experience.

More importantly, it has been demonstrated that species can
change, seemingly wholesale and seemingly in multiple locations. Whether this is an
adaptation to the environments, in the Darwinian concept, or whether this is some sort of
predestined evolutionary world-wide change, is a matter of philosophical prejudice, but
these changes have been documented well.35

Is it possible, then, that there is a merging of biological
properties between microorganisms, genetically and morphologically? Is it possible that
this bears a relationship to their interaction with more complex organisms, the process we
call disease? Perhaps there is a circularity to these relationships. Perhaps perturbing
this balance, this cybernetic relationship with attempts in vaccination or, for that
matter, attempts with extensive use of antibiotic therapy, merely disrupts the balanced
cybernetic relationship without with, as is natural for self-correcting servomechanisms,
returns to its original balance after a number of perturbations?

If this is so, perhaps it is not surprising that diseases which
are perturbed reappear in another 'dress.' I have been mystified by the disappearance of
syphilis in the age of sexual promiscuity. Where has this disease gone? At least some
observers, albeit not physicians, have suggested that it is AIDS in a new dress.36,37

The imperfect relationship between the process of infection and
disease has also remained problematic.38 We are taught that the "size of the
inoculum" bears a relationship to the success of the take, i.e., the infectivity.
This contrasts with the 'infectivity' of an inoculum on a culture medium, emphasizing the
importance of the properties of the host. This has been explained as a matter of
overcoming limited resistance, or immunity. I have not found this explanation entirely
satisfactory because, if the medium is conducive to growth, surely each infecting organism
might act alone. Is there cooperation between the infecting organisms? Who knows.

Another puzzle has been the presence of immunity against certain
illnesses in certain communities. For instance, in the Middle East most individuals have
antibodies to hepatitis-B while 'virgin' populations, such as workers in kidney dialysis
units, have been extremely susceptible on occasion by this blood-borne infection. It is
not quite plain how individuals, raised in the societies where this disease is endemic,
are not decimated. There has to be more to the relationship of the disease, and the hosts
and the community, than the concept conveyed by invading little devils, or a rain of new
bullets. This relationship is categorically absent from the reductionist view of modern
biology. Perhaps the limiting concept, is species.

Symbiosis

If we are willing, therefore, to accept that life on the planet
is more or less continuous, that the demarcation between species is imprecise, that
individuals are instances of temporary housing of a morphological reflection of certain
aspects of the biota (the word biota is used here as a reflection of some kind of
uniformity of the whole of biology), a number of paradoxes disappear, though I admit that
others are raised.39

Burnet believed that all organisms, at least all complex
organisms, contain within them something of the whole of the biological world. The whole
biota. This certainly would explain how it is possible for our lymphocytes to recognize
antigens from almost any organic source. How is it that they have, programmed within
themselves, receptor sites, or some mechanism for recognizing all these multiple
biological entities?

Individuals can develop immunity to all sorts of molecules which
they or their ancestors have never encountered, as far as we can reasonably judge. How are
they programmed to do this? Is it conceivable that the template is manufactured de novo
when the lymphocytes come into contact with a new molecule? Based on our knowledge of
receptor sites, by other criteria, they are highly developed entities. If we assume,
however, that through some mechanism unknown, the development of individual organisms
within species is predicated on some kind of re-evolution with the development of each
individual. Perhaps on the basis of fractals, the problem is less of a challenge.
Additionally, it might explain away the complete deficiency of information about anatomy
and ontogeny in the DNA genome, a major problem in biology which has puzzled the
intelligent and written-up by at least one important observer (yes, you guessed it; also
from outside medicine and biology).40

Another perspective

Günther Enderlein was the last of a limited school of scientists
who did not fall into what became later received opinion of biology. We are lucky that one
of his studies regarding the morphology of bacteria, their variations, their
inter-relationships and its significance, though published in German in 1925, has just
appeared in English.41 From his perspective, his followers now hold that mammalian cells
consist of a symbiosis of the natural mammalian programming combined with a resident
plant-like partner. The relationship between these entities is balanced, one might say for
mutual benefit, but that when the balance changes, the equivalent of disease occurs in the
creature which we ordinarily observe in clinical medicine; this is the patient. The
balance is predicated on the cyclical changes of this internal partner, the endobiont in
Enderlein's classification (readers will find an extensive terminological turmoil when
starting to study the subject) but, from a therapeutic point of view, the important news
is that, based on Enderlein's research and his establishment of a routine for preparing
remedies which influence these balances, it is possible for the savvy therapist to make
changes; this is not akin to killing the enemy using an antibiotic to decimate specific
bacteria, nor is this simply pouring in immune substances which will fight the enemy. The
approach is more subtle by an order of magnitude. It is that of re-balancing the
relationship between the two symbiotic partners by changing the internal milieu, mostly
the acid-base balance and the redox potential, of the host with diet and nutrient
supplements, on the one hand, and the valency of the endobiont, through a propagated
method, with its own species. These are the Enderleinian (Sanum) remedies.

It seems, to those of us who are learning to use these techniques
here in America (they have been in use in Europe, mostly the German-speaking lands, for
over 30years) that the enhancement of health with these methods is so subtle that it
probably obviates the need for many therapeutic interventions. I doubt if it will
substitute for immunization against tetanus, and if smallpox were prevalent, the same
comment would apply, but in all probability it has a role to play both in protection and
treatment of a host of other diseases including some of those for which vaccination has
turned out to be a mixed blessing, at best.

A cause for alarm?

There have appeared a number of reports that certain vaccines
contain hidden biological weapons. As we have mentioned, a number of complications
affecting the central nervous system and perhaps the introduction of unwanted disease,
through contamination of vaccines, are now well established. Cynics have claimed that the
viral contaminants are not contaminates at all, but are there for the purpose of provoking
disease in unwanted populations; at least, on an experimental basis.

The history of eugenics is not mysterious. It begins with a
cousin of Charles Darwin, SirFrancis Galton (1822-1911), reflected mostly in his book
Inquiries into Human Faculty, 1883. There exists essentially two perspectives about the
place of Human Beings in the best order of things. On the one hand, we can list the
biblical approach wherein it is believed that God gave Man husbandry of the fauna and
flora of the planet for his benefit, to grow and multiply. In modern times, this is
supported by the ideas of laissez faire, by the population and economic studies of Julian
Simon42 and, in a non-religious context, it is supported by the philosophy of Ayn Rand,43
who believed that there could be no conflict between rational men (albeit, from this
writer's perspective, most conflict is due to the irrationality of certain men), and with
the deterioration of the standard of education,44 the problem is worsening.

The other perspective is that even though Human Beings are the
product of natural evolution, and a beast like all others, a random production of a random
mutation and natural selection, nonetheless, this very natural acme of evolution is a
cancer on the planet. The slogan 'I have seen the enemy, and it is I' is an example of
what I alluded to earlier, that all slogans are disinformation. According to this
perspective, which the Christians would probably correctly call Satanic, the elite, the
keepers of the herd, the Illuminati will be inclined to decimate a large portion of these
useless eaters. The Nazis took their aim at the Untermench, the lesser breeds, after
decimating the mentally retarded and the homosexuals. Then went the Gypsies, the Jews, the
Slavs.45,46,47 We in America are following their footsteps. Our classification is a little
different. Unfortunately, the system is identical. Do we not have registration of the
population to the 'nth' degree? Do we not have classification by groups?

It is, therefore, alarming to read that some researchers have
found anti-reproductive antibodies in apparently benign vaccines. It is reported and alas
this writer cannot confirm firsthand that anti-tetanus toxoid, distributed in Third World
countries, contains human chorionic gonadotrophin (hGH).48,49 If this is so, this is a
form of provoking immunity against pregnancy; in other words, sterilization. Travelers
have reported that, in the Philippines, tetanus toxoid is given to women between age 15
and 45. Are not men at greater risk of wounds in an agricultural setting, as they always
have been, and for whom tetanus toxoid has hitherto been recommended? Unfortunately this
is a rhetorical question. Are there too many of us Human Beings?50 Should we destroy the
fecundity of some by stealth?

For myself, as an objectivist and believer in laissez faire, the
answer is a clear no. What is the Quality Control of the production of vaccines? Is there
an independent community-based oversight of this production? Can we trust the insiders who
have cinched their influence on government bodies?51

This writer is somewhat ambivalent, somewhat doubtful, in being
completely trusting. For instance, the polio vaccine, promoted by Rotary International, is
administered through the World Health Organization. The United Nations indeed has a very
mixed reputation in its support for humanity. This writer believes it has an agenda for a
New World Fascist regime.52

You see then, dear reader, how an attempt to review the role of
vaccination is just too difficult when one attempts to confine oneself to the issues of
immunology and biology. It is, therefore, again without apology that I have addressed a
spectrum of issues. One of the difficulties a writer, like this physician has is in
maintaining, or acquiring, a thorough knowledge of all the details of the issues. I do,
however, believe that specialization neglects the whole. If any of you reading this
article, wherever you find it or whoever you are, can help me with a more accurate
perspective of any of the details, I thank you in advance.

15 Here is one of many examples of secondary publications based
on this influence: Vaccinate Adults! A bulletin for adult medicine specialists from The
Immunization Action Coalition. 1573 Selby Ave., Ste 234. St. Paul, MN 55104.

16 Stopping Crib Death, by Joseph G. Hattersley. Apr. 7, 1994.

17 Vaccination: 100 years of Orthodox Research shows that
Vaccines Represent a Medical Assault on the Immune System, by Viera Scheibner, Ph.D. First
Australian edition pub. 1993, page xv.

23 All Polio in U.S. now Caused by Vaccine. The Seattle Times,
Tues. Jun. 10, 1993, p B4.5

24 Epidemiology of Poliomyelitis in the United States One Decade
After the Last Reported Case of Indigenous Wild-Associated Disease, by Peter M. Strebel,
et. al. Clinical Infectious Disease Feb. 1992, pp 568-579.

28 Vaccines and Projection of Negative Genetic Changes in Humans
(author not identified) 1996-1998. Leading Edge Research Group. Vaccination and Genetic
Change: Mobility of Genetic Material Between Life Forms.

30 What Happens When Science Goes Bad. The Corruption of Science
and the Origin of AIDS: A Study in Spontaneous Generation, by Louis Pascal. Working Paper
No. 9. Dec. 1991. Univ. of Wollongong Science and Technology Analysis Research Program.
Available from the Dept. of Science and Technology Studies. Univ. of Wollongong; PO Box
1144; Wollongoing NSW 2500 Australia. Ph: 61-42-213627. Fax: 61-42-213452.

45 The Scientific and Background of the Nazi "Race
Purification" Program, U.S. and German Eugenics, Ethnic Cleansing, Genocide,
Population Control by Theodore D. Hall, Ph.D. Available on the web, Leading Edge
International Research Group. http://www.trufax.org/avoid/Nazi.html

47 The Scientific and Background of the Nazi "Race
Purification" Program, U.S. and German Eugenics, Ethnic Cleansing, Genocide,
Population Control by Theodore D. Hall, Ph.D. Available on the web, Leading Edge
International Research Group. http://www.trufax.org/avoid/Nazi.html

49 The Development of Anti-Fertility Vaccines Challenging the
Immune System, written by Ute Sprenger. http://www.inx.de/'usp/antifert.htm
Reproduced from by Biotechnology in Development Monitor. No. 25, Dec 1995, pp 2-5.
Amsterdam, The Netherlands

50 An Essay on the Principal of Population, by Thomas R. Malthus.
1798.

51 The Vaccine Machine. A Gannett News Service Special Report
written by correspondents Chris Collins and John Hanchette for The Reporter, a Gannett
newspaper in Lansdale, PA, Dec. 1984.

52 Global TyrannyStep by Step: The United Nations and the
Emerging New World Order, by William F. Jasper. Pub. Western Islands, Appleton, WI 1992.