For years, Garry Watson, 49, of little Bunker, Mo., (population 390)
had been squabbling with town officials over the sewage line easement
which ran across his property to the adjoining, town-operated sewage lagoon.

Residents say officials grew dissatisfied with their existing easement,
and announced they were going to excavate a new sewer line across the
landowner's property. Capt. Chris Ricks of the Missouri Highway Patrol
reports Watson's wife, Linda, was served with "easement right-of-way
papers" on Sept. 6. She gave the papers to Watson when he got home
at 5 a.m. the next morning from his job at a car battery recycling plant
northeast of Bunker. Watson reportedly went to bed for a short time, but
arose about 7 a.m. when the city work crew arrived.

"He told them 'If you come on my land, I'll kill you,' " Bunker
resident Gregg Tivnan told me last week. "Then the three city workers
showed up with a backhoe, plus a police officer. They'd sent along a cop
in a cop car to guard the workers, because they were afraid there might
be trouble. Watson had gone inside for a little while, but then he came
out and pulled his SKS (semi-automatic rifle) out of his truck, steadied
it against the truck, and he shot them."

Killed in the September 7 incident, from a range of about 85 yards, were
Rocky B. Gordon, 34, a city maintenance man, and David Thompson, 44, an
alderman who supervised public works. City maintenance worker Delmar Eugene
Dunn, 51, remained in serious but stable condition the following weekend.

Bunker police Officer Steve Stoops, who drove away from the scene after
being shot, was treated and released from a hospital for a bullet wound
to his arm and a graze to the neck.

Watson thereupon kissed his wife goodbye, took his rifle, and disappeared
into the woods, where his body was found two days later -- dead of an
apparently self-inflicted gunshot wound.

Following such incidents, the local papers are inevitably filled with
well-meaning but mawkish doggerel about the townsfolk "pulling together"
and attempting to "heal" following the "tragedy."
There are endless expressions of frustration, pretending to ask how such
an otherwise peaceful member of the community could "just snap like
that."

In fact, the supposedly elusive explanation is right before our eyes.

"He was pushed," Clarence Rosemann -- manager of the local
Bunker convenience store, who'd done some excavation work for Watson --
told the big-city reporters from St. Louis.

Another area resident, who didn't want to be identified, told the visiting
newsmen, "Most people are understanding why Garry Watson was upset.
They are wishing he didn't do it, but they are understanding why he did
it."

You see, to most of the people who work in government and the media these
days -- especially in our urban centers -- "private property"
is a concept out of some dusty, 18th century history book. Oh, sure, "property
owners" are allowed to live on their land, so long as they
pay rent to the state in the form of "property taxes."

But an actual "right" to be let alone on our land to do whatever
we please -- always providing we don't actually endanger the lives or
health of our neighbors?

Heavens! If we allowed that, how would we enforce all our wonderful new
"environmental protection" laws, or the "zoning codes,"
or the laws against growing hemp or tobacco or distilling whisky without
a license, or any of the endless parade of other malum prohibitum
decrees which have multiplied like swarms of flying ants in this nation
over the past 87 years?

What does it mean to say we have any "rights" or "freedoms"
at all, if we cannot peacefully enjoy that property which we buy with
the fruits of our labors? In his 1985 book "Takings," University
of Chicago Law Professor Richard Epstein wrote that, "Private property
gives the right to exclude others without the need for any justification.

Indeed, it is the ability to act at will and without need for justification
within some domain which is the essence of freedom, be it of speech or
of property."

"Unfortunately," replies James Bovard, author of the book "Freedom
in Chains: The Rise of the State and the Demise of the Citizen,"
"federal law enforcement agents and prosecutors are making private
property much less private. ... Park Forest, Ill. in 1994 enacted an ordinance
that authorizes warrantless searches of every single-family rental home
by a city inspector or police officer, who are authorized to invade rental
units 'at all reasonable times.' ... Federal Judge Joan Gottschall struck
down the searches as unconstitutional in 1998, but her decision will have
little or no effect on the numerous other localities that authorize similar
invasions of privacy."

We are now involved in a war in this nation, a last-ditch struggle in
which the other side contends only the king's men are allowed to use force
or the threat of force to push their way in wherever they please, and
that any peasant finally rendered so desperate as to employ the same kind
of force routinely employed by our oppressors must surely be a "lone
madman" who "snapped for no reason."

No, we should not and do not endorse or approve the individual choices
of folks like Garry Watson. But we are still obliged to honor their memories
and the personal courage it takes to fight and die for a principle, even
as we lament both their desperate, misguided actions ... and the systematic
erosion of our liberties which gave them rise.

"Just because one government agent has a piece of paper that's signed
by another government agent, does that mean there's no more right to private
property?" asks my friend Gregg Tivnan.

Vin Suprynowicz is assistant editorial page editor of the Las Vegas
Review-Journal, and editor of Financial Privacy Report (subscribe by calling
Norm at 612-895-8757.) His book, "Send in the Waco Killers: Essays
on the Freedom Movement, 1993-1998," is available by dialing 1-800-244-2224;
or via web site http://www.thespiritof76.com/wacokillers.html.