South Africa has one of the world’s highest rates of HIV infection. New research, led by Brown University professor Mark Lurie, shows that the movement of workers between urban and rural areas played a key role in the spread of the epidemic. Results are published in AIDS.

PROVIDENCE, R.I. [Brown University] — Labor
migration played a critical role in the spread of HIV in South Africa, according
to new research published in the journal AIDS.

Using data collected from nearly 500 men and women living in
bustling towns and rural villages, researchers from Brown University, Harvard
Medical School and Imperial College London created a mathematical model that
shows that migration of South African workers played a major role in the spread
of HIV mainly by increasing high-risk sexual behavior.

South Africa has one of the world’s highest rates of HIV
infection. According to UNAIDS, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS,
an estimated 5.5 million South Africans were living with HIV in 2005 and roughly
1,000 AIDS deaths occur in South Africa every day.

“The AIDS epidemic in South Africa is devastating –
and the migration of workers played an incredibly important role in its
spread,” said Mark Lurie, an assistant professor in the Department of
Community Health at Brown. “While the epidemic is already pervasive in
South Africa, our findings have policy implications for other countries with
high rates of population mobility. Countries like India and China could see a
surge in HIV rates unless there is proper prevention and treatment efforts among
migrants and their partners.”

Lurie is a native South African and social epidemiologist. For
more than a decade, he has studied HIV transmission in his home country, with a
particular interest in the millions of internal and foreign labor migrants
circulating among South Africa’s nine provinces.

This movement is circular, Lurie explains. To earn a living,
many South Africans, mostly young men, leave their rural homes to work in urban
factories or mining towns then return to their villages a few times each year.
After visiting their families – and reuniting with their wives –
they return to dig for gold or titanium or to make paper or aluminum. This
migration escalated with the end of apartheid, when travel restrictions were
lifted for millions of black South Africans.

From October 1998 to November 2000, Lurie and his team studied a
total of 488 migrant and non-migrant men and women in the South African province
of KwaZulu/Natal. They gathered a variety of biological and behavioral data,
including HIV status, number of sexual partners, and condom use.

Using this data, Lurie led a team that studied precisely how
this migration helped fuel the spread of HIV. Did the virus proliferate mainly
because this movement created connections between higher-risk urban areas and
lower-risk rural areas? Or did HIV spread mainly because men at work – and
women at home – were separated from their sexual partners for long periods
of time and therefore more likely to have unprotected sex to fill that absence?

The team created a mathematical model to find the answers. They
found that without migration – and without migration-induced increases in
unsafe sex – peak HIV prevalence would be less than 5 percent for migrants
and non-migrants alike, as well as their sexual partners. By contrast,
Lurie’s primary data showed HIV prevalence to be 26 percent among migrant
men and 21 percent among their partners.

“Our model showed that migration primarily influences HIV
spread by increasing high-risk sexual behavior,” Lurie said.
“Migrant men were four times as likely to have a casual sexual partner
than non-migrant men. So, when coupled with an increase in unprotected sex, we
found the frequent return of migrant workers to be an important risk factor for
HIV.”

The model also allowed the research team to do what could not be
done in the real world: Calculate HIV prevalence as if apartheid-era travel
restrictions were still in place. The results were stunning: If travel
restrictions had remained, and migrants were only allowed to return home
infrequently as they were under apartheid, HIV prevalence among adults would be
about 4 percent, not today’s 18 percent prevalence rate.

“There are lots of reasons why HIV spread rapidly in South
Africa,” Lurie said. “Now we know that migration is at least one
critical driver. While this knowledge comes too late to stop the epidemic in
South Africa, it provides a warning for countries elsewhere in Africa and Asia.
In other highly mobile places, HIV prevention programs need to address increased
risk behavior – and do so early, when these efforts can make a
difference.”

Megan Coffee of Harvard Medical School was the lead author of
the AIDS article. Geoff Garnett, of Imperial College London, also
assisted in the research. The Wellcome Trust funded the work, with additional
support from the South African Medical Research Council and the National
Institute of Mental Health.

Editors: Brown University has a fiber link television
studio available for domestic and international live and taped interviews and
maintains an ISDN line for radio interviews. For more information, call the
Office of Media Relations at (401) 863-2476.