I could only watch the first 2 minutes of this sickening classroom discussion. The teacher tells her class “The NRA wants kids to buy guns (AK’s) and go crazy with them” (explaining black on black violence) so they can make $1 billion a year. A student even questioned her logic and she did an “uhh...uhhh...well the NRA is behind it all”. Her entire lecture is NRA = black on black shootings.

This woman is a coward. When her faulty logic is challenged by one student she forces him to look at a list of people killed by guns and challenges him to try and defend it, knowing, of course, that he would lack the knowledge and debating skills to do so.

I would love to see an informed individual who whose grade(s) wouldn't suffer challenge her views. Her students need to know how wrong both she and her teaching methods are.

15
posted on 04/27/2012 11:52:23 AM PDT
by South40
(Mitt is full of Shtt)

Yes, of course. The first lesson in Eddie the Eagle's class is use racial epithets and kill minorities. How did I not know this? It's a shame what happens when you grow up out in the country with blacks and asians for best friends. You don't get to learn how to hate people for things you never really noticed like skin color like they big city folk in places like ChiTown.

They don't care about black-on-black killing. They care about middle-class-on-underclass killing (for example, the relative attention given Trayvon versus other killings). Greater availability of firearms to middle-class people who would otherwise be the prey of underclass thugs is upsetting to them.

Perhaps the reason is that they think that if the middle class was no longer worried about black rioting, they wouldn't get as many goodies. Perhaps they are right.

28
posted on 04/27/2012 2:03:45 PM PDT
by PapaBear3625
(In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)

Thus, about twice as many black people are killed each year by other black people than were lynched in 86 years.

Yes but in the mind of a liberal/black, the reason for the killing is more important. i.e., killing for a pair of tennis shoes or because one is not wearing the correct color bandana is far better reason to kill than because one is black. All are wrong, of course.

29
posted on 04/27/2012 2:14:32 PM PDT
by South40
(Mitt is full of Shtt)

Oddly enough, in the case of abortions, it is one thing in which the Democrats are not hypocritical. They not only favor euthanasia, but by putting an emphasis on black abortion, they are in yet another way sponsoring “genocidal euthanasia”. The systematic extermination of slave-descended black Americans.

They are so passionate about wanting to wipe out SD black Americans that their most important emphasis is to provide as many abortions in black neighborhoods as easily as possible. While they are not adverse to white abortion, they really commit the resources to killing black babies.

And, for that matter, preventing them in the first place, by providing lots of long term birth control, such as “the shot”, to black neighborhoods.

A hidden part of their program is to encourage sex before and outside of marriage, and the critical nature of this should not be underestimated. Because to have this, most black women will want birth control, and if they do get pregnant, to abort. And for those who have children, having a single parent makes a 60% greater chance that their male children will become criminals.

Cumulative factors, and within a generation or two a noticeable drop in SD black demographics. In this case it is concealed, because African immigrants are added to the numbers, though a high percentage of them avoid SD blacks as living a hazardous and unwholesome lifestyle.

33
posted on 04/27/2012 3:48:46 PM PDT
by yefragetuwrabrumuy
("It is already like a government job," he said, "but with goats." -- Iranian goat smuggler)

This is the product of all that 'diversity' programming. I had black teachers during the early days of integrated schools who spoke English very well, and insisted their students (of any color) do so also. Some even seemed to go harder on the blacks who spoke 'gullah' because at the time, only being able to perform up to the highest standards was regarded as the ticket out of poverty.

Since the advent of 'cultural studies' programs, self-esteem crusades, and the like, the bar has been progressively lowered, to the detriment of generations.

I understand those seeking to rediscover cultural roots often fall prey to scams, but so many have been promoted from within the black community, not excluding the 'Kwanza' ceremony, that it is sad.

Instead of Booker T Washington or George W Carver promoting world class people, we end up with Van Jones and Alan Sharpton getting over on their own.

42
posted on 04/27/2012 7:31:28 PM PDT
by Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.