Your answer has been submitted

What do others think?

Server Side Error

We faced problems while connecting to the server or receiving data from the server. Please wait for a few seconds and try again.

If the problem persists, then check your internet connectivity. If all other sites open fine, then please contact the administrator of this website with the following information.

TextStatus: undefinedHTTP Error: undefined

Processing your request

Error

Some error has occured.

Recently, Conor McGregor and Khabib Nurmagomedov have both received lengthy bans as a result of their fight at UFC 229. According to media reports, McGregor has been fined $50,000 and suspended for six months while Nurmagomedov was fined $500,000 and banned for nine months.

Some media analysts believe that the fines and bans are justified. They believe that Khabib was fined more than McGregor because he won the UFC championship. Whereas, others believe that the disparity in fines and bans is not justified. Furthermore, they argued that both should have been fined equally.

This scenario instigated a debate across social media regarding whether the UFC punishment for Khabib and Conor is justified?

Our picks

About Us

Daily Debate polls give people accross the globe a legitimate place to voice their opinion, highlight important issues that require action, and/or just a place to un wind by taking part in constructive debates that are important to you.