You know. A false flag op is when a nation attacks itself but
makes it appear that an enemy has committed the attack. This way it stirs its more or less peace-loving people into going
to war with the demonized “enemy.” It’s false flag ops 1.1.

And Flagg is not a misspelling of flag but the name of a former
FBI agent, Warren Flagg who (along with a former federal prosecutor) helped direct the New England investigation of the Sept.
11 attacks. Flagg was nice enough in a Newsday.com piece by Michael Dorman to mention that “one bag found in Boston contained
far more than what the commission report cited, including the names of the hijackers, their assignments and their al-Qaida
connections.” Gee, what luck!

"You know, it might have appeared that way, but from my close-up
inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual site of
the building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you can pick up
in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate
that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. Now, even though if you
look at the pictures of the Pentagon you see that the floors have all collapsed; that didn't happen immediately....."

Today, Mariani, like the other 9-11 plaintiffs, is under a
gag order which prevents her from speaking about her ongoing lawsuit. Likewise, thousands of employees of federal agencies
like the Federal Aviation Administration have received gag orders in the mail keeping them from telling what they know about
the events of 9-11.

After more than four years, however, Mariani’s determined pursuit
for the truth about 9-11 through the court system has failed to yield any answers or discovery about who is responsible for
9-11. Today, she is no closer to obtaining what she has stated she wanted from the beginning—a trial by jury.

In March an Aerospace investigator with 15 years experience
analyzing Shuttle accidents emailed that he wanted photos of the Pentagon HOLE and the impact engine. His plan was to determine
the angle of approach of the aircraft by calculating the distance of the engine from the the engine's impact on the wall and
to write an article putting to rest the controversy of the approach angle. MSM claims the aircraft impacted at a 45 degree
angle and penetrated 3 rings of the Pentagon. That article NOT being written makes it evident that the MSM Pentagon Hoax is
full of holes. Here is a sneak preview on the HOLE investigation:

There is substantial evidence that thermite was used to cut
the central support columns, which caused the towers to fall.

Evidence can be seen on photographs of the columns from the
rubble of the World Trade Center.

In this photo, for example, the column directly above the fireman's
helmet shows that it was cut with thermite. There is a substantial amount of hardened molten iron which can be seen on both
the inside and outside of the box column. This is precisely what one would expect to find on a column which had been cut with
thermite.

Former federal terrorism investigators say a piece of luggage
hastily checked in at the Portland, Maine, airport by a World Trade Center hijacker on the morning of Sept. 11 provided the
Rosetta stone enabling FBI agents to swiftly unravel the mystery of who carried out the suicide attacks and what motivated
them.

Yesterday's San Francisco Chronicle 9/11 hit piece by Cinnamon
Stillwell has encountered massive backlash from the alternative truth community after it cynically dismissed legitimate concerns
about 9/11 and labeled anyone who voiced them as anti-semitic extremists.

In a new development this morning, the paper was forced to
issue a retraction following Cinnamon Stillwell's outright falsehood that the "whole country witnessed the horrific sight
of planes flying into the....Pentagon," a glaring error first highlighted by this website on Wednesday morning.

It was this collaborative approach that led Jon and I to conclude
that no 757 hit the Pentagon so we looked for alternatives. The only plane that made sense was either a 737 or an A3
Skywarrior, both of which can use the same types of jet engines up to a point.

A San Francisco Chronicle hit piece which purports to tell
'the truth about 9/11 conspiracy theories' dismisses questions about what happened at the Pentagon by saying that the whole
country witnessed the site of a plane flying into the building. The only problem with that statement is that nobody outside
of the FBI has seen anything fly into the Pentagon save a few grainy frames from a security camera which the Pentagon doesn't
even validate.

If Web sites such as whatreallyhappened.com, 911truth.org and
scholarsfor911truth.org (among countless others) are any indication, the Sept. 11 conspiracists have become a movement in
their own right. Despite a host of differences, they share the belief that the widely accepted version of what happened on
Sept. 11 is merely a front for a shadowy plot to fool the American people.

The main article I will be referencing throughout this discussion
was titled, "9/11 Commission Comic - It's a giant leap from 'Jughead' to 'The 9/11 Report'." Go ahead and read that a couple
of more times like I did until your mind adjusts.......I'll wait........ok. Just like Joe Camel dressed up death-by-smoking
for children, so now is a major publisher turning the 9/11 Commission Report into a "comic". But since 9/11 isn't really that
funny they describe what they're doing as, "turning the dense, painful breakdown of the horrors of that morning in 2001 into
a more digestible form: the graphic novel."

The former top economist in Bush's Department of Labor, Morgan
Reynolds, will speak out on the 9/11 inside job at the State Historical Society, University of Wisconsin-Madison on Saturday,
May 6th. The film Loose Change will be shown, and refreshments served, starting at 1 p.m, and Reynolds will speak at
3:00 p.m.

Teresa Hampton, editor of Capitol Hill Blue, has responded
to my criticism of Doug Thompson for his characterization of people interested in nine eleven truth as fools, lemmings, scam
artists, and other not so nice names (a link to this article no longer exists). Ms. Hampton seems to believe I am lining my
pockets here via Pay Pal donation button (less obtrusive than numerous flashing banner ads courtesy of multinational corporations)
while Thompson gives ad money to charity. I am roundly chastised for not reading the Capitol Hill Blue FAQ on such things.
Ms. Hampton calls this shoddy journalism, or a “mouth” with a “modem.”

Actor Charlie Sheen made history when he first questioned the
official story of 9/11, calling it the "biggest conspiracy theory of them all." Sheen's comments sent shockwaves across the
alternative media and have been one of the biggest stories on the internet for weeks. The story also garnered prime time coverage
by major news outlets including CNN, FOX News, and hundreds of newspapers worldwide.

The transcript the feds released this week of the final minutes
of Flight 93 proves that President Bush brazenly and consistently lied to the American people about how that flight ended.
The transcript shows that the Arab hijackers chose to crash the plane into the ground after the American passengers stormed
the cockpit. There is no guarantee that the transcript is accurate, and the government has already been caught fabricating
evidence at terrorist trials in the post 9/11 era. But the government’s own version of events damns Bush. The transcript was
available in early 2002, if not earlier, and was shown at that time by federal officials to some of the survivors of the people
killed when Flight 93 went down.

All link to the same, discredited "sources" for their claims.
All claim to have "evidence" that is nothing but flights of fancy. All, in my opinion, are scams. I've spent weeks searching
through these web sites and read all the links to so-called "evidence" and I have yet to find one, single, shred of verifiable
information that provides any proof that our government planned or executed the attacks.

The London Observer carried an article in this week's edition
by movie critic Mark Kermode which again wholesale refused to address any of the evidence that Charlie Sheen had raised to
clarify his stance on 9/11.

Charlie Sheen is an actor who has exhaustively researched 9/11.
Mark Kermode is a movie critic who, judging from his pathetic hit piece, has swallowed without question what the US government
told him happened on 9/11 without one iota of independent investigation.

The evidence is in, the analyses have been made, and conclusions
have been drawn by scientists, engineers and other experts: the so-called terror attacks of September 11, 2001 were faked.
There is, moreover, independent evidence from multiple and credible sources that Al Qaeda is the creation of western intelligence
agencies.

Standing up to Italian crime gangs is not anti-Italian; standing
up to American crime gangs is not anti-American; and standing up to homosexuals who have been blackmailed over their homosexuality
is not anti-homosexual.

So don't be fooled into thinking that standing up to Zionist
crime gangs is anti-Semitic!

When I first read the March 31 Capitol Hill Blue headline,
"9/11 conspiracy theories don't pass the smell test," I thought editor Doug Thompson was pulling an April Fool's joke on us
a day early. Buoyed by Thompson's well-deserved reputation for being out there first with "damn the torpedoes -- full speed
ahead" -- truth no matter where it takes him, I read avidly to the end of the rant, poised to burst into laughter at his "Gotcha!"
punch line. It wasn't there.

The group, which Jones said has 200 members, maintains a Web
site at www.st911.org. A 40-page paper by Jones, along with other peer-reviewed and non-reviewed
academic papers, are posted on the site.

Last year, Jones presented various arguments for his theory
that explosives or incendiary devices were planted in the Trade Towers, and in WTC 7, a smaller building in the Trade Center
complex, and that those materials, not planes crashing into the buildings, caused the buildings to collapse.

(Note: This article is written with empathy for all who were
injured or who lost loved ones on September 11, 2001 or in the wars that followed, and with deep respect for the memory of
all who have died. It is also written out of the conviction that important facts about the 9/11 events have been "officially"
covered up and that the truth must be brought to light. Though the subject matter is profoundly troubling, the writer hopes
this article will offer some new perspectives, raise new questions, and assist others who are seeking truth in the interest
of preventing future troubles.)

Two ground zero workers go public about finding cockpit and
flight data recorders from Flight 11 and 175. Government claims 'black boxes' from the doomed 911 flights were never found.
911 Commission ignores information and fails to interview rescue workers.

Every news story you are about to review in this comprehensive
research paper, prepared by Dr. Albert D Pastore Phd., is true and easily verifiable. This investigation represents
10 months of careful study, research, analysis, source verification and logical deduction. Every event and quote presented
here is 100% accurate.

The days and hours leading up to 9-11 were marked by a series
of chilling warnings about impending terrorist plots involving hijacked commercial airplanes. It's worth mentioning at this
point that months before 9-11, the U.S. had already informed some of its allies of plans to go to war in Afghanistan. On June
26, 2001, News Insight/India Reacts, an Indian public affairs magazine, wrote:

"Thousands of FBI agents have rounded up more than 1,300 suspects
across America since September 11, but they have failed to find a single Al-Qaeda cell operating in the United States...Tom
Ridge, Director of Homeland Security could not explain why none had been caught."

"The 9/11 attacks succeeded because of the incredible improbability
that such a ragtag group could pull it off and our lackluster intelligence agencies failed to act on credible reports of terrorist
activity. I know my government. They're just not good enough to pull off something like this," writes Capital Hill Blue publisher
and founder Doug Thompson (recovering alcoholic and proud of it too...)

So 60 Minutes had free access to Bin Laden’s driver? They expect
us to believe that 60 Minutes had access to this most valuable target of the US war on terror, yet the U.S. has not attempted
to “rendition” him into one of our secret prisons by now? The host nation of this terror suspect never even gets mentioned
by our controlled media? What happened to Bush’s “with us or against us” threat to nations that host terrorists?