Hello all,
I didn't report this as a bug because I don't really know much about
pregexp, however, this interactions makes me think something is wrong
with 371.3:
> (pregexp-match-positions "[:digit:]" "[1 implements] -This implements the blablablu")
((3 . 4))
> (pregexp-match-positions "\\d" "[1 implements] -This implements the blablablu")
((1 . 2))
Is this supposed to be like this? Or is there a bug here somewhere? I
would say that the first reply from the repl is incorrect.
Cheers,
--
Paulo Jorge Matos - pocm at soton.ac.uk
http://www.personal.soton.ac.uk/pocm
PhD Student @ ECS
University of Southampton, UK