définition - 2009 strasbourg kehl summit

2009 Strasbourg–Kehl summit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article may need to be updated. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information, and remove this template when finished. Please see the talk page for more information. (April 2009)

Although the first of the significant summit events in Germany was held in Baden-Baden, the town was left off the official logo. This led to protests from local politicians; but the result was a comparatively calm beginning to a summit which also provided the opportunity for dramatic protests on the second day.[5]

On Friday, 3 April 2009, the summit's first official event was a working dinner at the Kurhaus, Baden-Baden.

The first event on Saturday, 4 April 2009, focused on Chancellor Merkel's welcome to the NATO leaders as they arrived individually in Kehl, Germany. Then, having gathered on the German side of the Rhine River, the NATO Leaders walked together across the Passerelle pedestrian bridge to Strasbourg, France. The NATO leaders were greeted at the French border by President Sarkozy. Meetings were held at the Palais de la Musique et des Congrès (Place de Bordeaux), Strasbourg. [3]

On the French side of the Rhine, the 28 national leaders posed for the NATO "family portrait", a tradition at NATO summits. Then the main work began with a working lunch and at other meetings in Strasbourg.[3]

In addition, several heads of state, government leaders and other principals were involved in non–summit events which encompassed individual and/or bilateral events on the margins of the formal summit agenda.[3]

Issues

After 60 years, NATO found itself on the cusp of a watershed period in the organization's history;[19] and top items on the agenda included:

Afghanistan war

Some have argued that the most critical issue NATO faces in 2009 arises from Afghanistan.[20] Any NATO discussion about Afghanistan involves developing a comprehensive strategy which brings non-NATO regional powers into a discussion about how best to proceed in short- and longer-term time frames.[21] Although the newly elected Obama continued to enjoy a reservoir of good will, experts anticipated only token gestures of support for any plan which involves increased levels of European troops.[22] In the end, the allies managed to find more reasons for consensus than had been expected, and the increases in the various commitments from the Europeans was a little greater than had been anticipated.[23]

Relations with Russia

Russia's relationships with the West are a perennial NATO concern.[20] Obama summarized his view of the dialogue with Russia about maintaining stability while protecting the autonomy of all countries in Europe: "I think that it is important for NATO allies to engage Russia and to recognize that they have legitimate interests in some cases, we’ve got common interests, but we also have some core disagreements."[4]

France's reintegration

France's decision to abandon its distance from the NATO military hierarchy caused all the allies to evaluate the potential ramifications.[20] In 1966, then-President Charles de Gaulle caused France to withdraw from the U.S.-led military command.[24] Sarkozy determined that the time was ripe to change course radically, and the French Parliament backed this decision with a vote of confidence.[25] In time, the NATO allies will adjust fully to this new reality, but this NATO summit was a only a beginning in that uncertain process of reconciliation.

New strategic concept

The tumble of events in the past years has made it necessary to re-examine NATO's core strategic concepts. This re-assessment opens up possibilities for change and for plausible "new" strategies and "new" assumptions as well.[20] At this summit, the allied leaders moved forward in a process which is expected to result in a new strategic doctrine which will be formally adopted at next year's summit in Lisbon, Portugal. The updated vision of NATO contemplates a range of expanded responsibilities, including out-of-area operations in Afghanistan and anti-piracy patrols near the Horn of Africa.[20]

Unresolved questions surrounded all aspects of potential NATO expansion.[1] On 1 April 2009, two days before the summit's first day, Albania and Croatia were accepted as full members of the organization. The President and Prime Minister of each of these newest NATO allies attended the summit. Official flag-raising ceremonies at NATO's headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, were planned for 7 April 2009.[26]

Protests and security measures

This section's factual accuracy may be compromised because of out-of-date information. Please help improve the article by updating it. There may be additional information on the talk page. (7 April 2009)

In view of announced protests, French and German authorities announced plans to restrict access to and movement within designated security areas, including parts of Strasbourg and Kehl.[29] These included the requirement that 700 local residents living in a restricted area of Kehl would not be allowed to leave their homes between Friday night and Saturday morning without requesting a police escort.[30] In response, War Resisters International argued that the measures are contrary to the French constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights.[31] Following negotiations, protest organizers accused German authorities of stalling tactics and are considering legal action.[32]

German police estimates anticipate that 25,000 protesters will seek to express themselves during the summit.[29] The threat will be met with a projected 15,000 German police; and these forces will be augmented by Bundeswehr support, including interceptor planes, transport helicopters, paramedics, motorcycle escorts, buses and other vehicles.[30] Major demonstrations and protest activities are anticipated on Saturday in France. In contrast, Baden-Baden's increased security preparations seemed not to affect an abiding sense of calm in the German resort town.[33]

France is temporarily reactivating border controls with neighboring European nations for two weeks in anticipation of the summit. These strict measures are designed to "guarantee security" and minimize terrorism risks during the summit.[34]Special permission has been granted to France and Germany to suspend the Schengen Agreement which guarantees free passage for all European Union citizens traveling between EU member states.[35]