Disclaimer: the posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.

Saturday, February 16, 2013

CHALLENGE TO BBC COVERAGE OF 9 11; OSCAR FOR BEST PROPAGANDA; CHILD ABUSE

On 25 February 2013, in the town of Horsham in the United Kingdom, 3 hours of detailed 9/11 evidence is to be presented and considered in a court of law.

The BBC will be challenged over the inaccurate and biased manner in which it has portrayed 9/11.

Over the last 16 months, the BBC has been challenged strongly by individuals in the UK over two of its documentaries.

Formal complaints were lodged with BBC over the inaccuracy and bias of these documentaries, which, according to 9/11 activists, was in breach of the operating requirements of BBC through their ‘Royal Charter and Agreement’ with the British public.

This document requires BBC to show information that is both accurate and impartial.

These complaints were supported by the US-based educational charity Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth), which submitted detailed scientific evidence to BBC to buttress the complaints.

The case was heard on 23 November 2012, with the hearing notes published on 8 February 2013.

The case upheld the earlier decision regarding insurance matters connected to 911 in that insured losses caused by the attacks on the World Trade Center arose out of two events and not one (similar to the insurance award to Larry Silverstein).

I don't know anything about the 3 parties involved, but it may be worth some further research.....

The BBC or Bum Boys Club, as its known at the beeb, is a standing joke for the way they handled the Jimmy savile fiasco, airbrushing out all the boys abused by him and only mentining girls.During W W II the BBc was called by servicemen "bullshit time " as it was so loaded with propagandaBIGMAC

A lawsuit doomed and planned to fail in spectacular fashion, or fizzle out in a pathetic amateurish show.

Inoculation suit is one insider legal term for it. (got that from AP?) This link also covers the same topic looking at three other 911 suits that went bad.http://911review.com/disinfo/lawsuits.html

The 911 truth movement constantly sets up people as leaders only to turn them into clowns later on to discredit the whole show.Charlie Sheen, Rosie O'Donnel being two examples.

Good of you to pick up on what appears to be a controlled fake lawsuit..........I was initially excited yesterday when I heard about it.This site seems to have morphed into something much much closer to the Icke site lately, IMO. Very odd.

If you follow the logic in the link that CanSpeccy provided - i.e. it's a scam, then perhaps "someones" are having an even bigger laugh given the location of the "court of law" - considering the horse meat shennanigans.