Nope, now I have five, and you've failed to read any of them successfully, or you might deduce I know quite a lot about TOR and the risks of using it (regardless of how YOU choose to define "use").

You have 1 post immediately after OP, then you have 1 post that I initially responded to, and now you have 3 posts telling me to read the other two (hint: those don't count, if you can't figure out why, you're a bigger idiot than I thought).

Would you like to clarify whatever point you were making in this post, or are you just gonna posture all day?

You have 1 post immediately after OP, then you have 1 post that I initially responded to, and now you have 3 posts telling me to read the other two (hint: those don't count, if you can't figure out why, you're a bigger idiot than I thought).

Would you like to clarify whatever point you were making in this post, or are you just gonna posture all day?

Yep, I read it, right to the end - even referenced it in one of my posts. wrabbit seems to be saying that all TOR use is risky and illegitimate, which I disagree with - primarily because he ignored/confused technical aspects in making that assumption. He has yet to refute, he's just getting his little bunny ears all ruffled, instead.

Speaking of Good Causes, Applebaum and crew are working literally today (11/30) to liberate Syrian communications, because Bashar al-Assad is trying (and failing) to prevent news of his genocide from leaving the country.