Johann: No need to use all possibilities for merits for one alone but good to invite others to join and become more independend till free.

2019 Jan 15 15:04:39

Johann: no requirement to do all, merits step by step. "The path to nibbana is hard", they say, and don't do even little steps, Nyom. As inspired, its at least a working and concentration camp, Devas delight in creation, Devas having contr. over the creation of others.

While "include " is perfect to imbedd the many often use of sources, makes all wunderful to maintain simply at the source-file, the selection works by using the specific section header only.

It makes it not easy to perform new pages automaticly on one hand, and the other is that headers may change.

Now: hiddenheader seems to be perfect to work with the sutta codes as header/anchor, and at first glance works fine. There seems to be, how ever, a bug, performing the section edit not work right, creating an additional line in the middle of the last </sp... an> tag, when then saved breaks the whole page and also generates other anchors-links in a way that the anchor's "." would be deleted in the html.

Not sure if this will cause any other problems. Maybe there is a good reason why DokuWiki would remove all dots from anchor links and section ids. It should not cause any big problems (like data loss) but changes only how the page is rendered. So if something is wrong with this approach and something strange appears, one can simply change it back and look for a better way.

It might be that the change only comes into effect for each page after editing it one more time (to rebuild the page in the cache, but I'm not sure how this process works in detail and maybe it happens automatically after some time. For the test page http://accesstoinsight.eu/playground/playground/anchor#mv0102 it worked after just making a small change in the file and saving again).

PHPXref 0.7 states:"Creates a XHTML valid linkid from a given headline title"

Not sure about XHTML and dots in anchor or id.

How ever, as a dot might be common in headers (1. ..., 2. ...), and as far as perceived before (that there was no "problem" before hidden-plugin), it seems that there must be two renderings, one for the created link and one for the created ID of headers. Not sure if the possible change by the plugin did not left something in the part of rendering the ID of the title behind.

(the solution might be overwritten when upgrade is made, wouldn't it)

* Johann : may there be joy and release in good undertakings Nyom Moritz

My person still thinks that there are two actions involved, one rendering IDs and one Anchor-Links, and that hidden-plugin left something behind in the sphere of the ID-rendering. (independent of the matter ".", ":" or not in the DW-complex)