Sorry if this is duplicate - I'm trying to switch over to using gmail for
W3C discussions but the messages don't seem to be getting through.
+++
FYI - I am using this email address now, to reduce the overhead on my
desktop email.
This looks fine as a FPWD. I will send some other comments to the list.
Here is the only comment needing to be fixed prior to publication: The
version/published/draft links are to the HTML Media Capture API.
Bryan
-----Original Message-----
From: public-device-apis-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-device-apis-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 9:38 PM
To: public-device-apis@w3.org
Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
Subject: CfC: The Media Capture API FPWD
Hi all,
Robin is away, but we agreed at the teleconference today to start a
call for consensus on the Media Capture API, ending next week (
publication will include the change from ACTION-267 to add the note
regarding ISSUE-101 to the text, this has not been done yet.) [1]
This is a call for consensus to see if there are any objections to
publishing the Media Capture API as a FPWD.
The draft can be read at:
http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/camera/Overview-API.html
Note that there is no requirement on API FPWDs to be perfect - if they
were perfect we'd go straight to LC. They need to be good for broader
review, and reasonably feature-complete.
Where CfCs are concerned, silence is considered to be assent, but
positive support is preferred (even if simply with a +1). Please send
feedback before next Tuesday (Sept 6) as much as possible.
Thanks!
regards, Frederick
Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
Co-Chair, W3C DAP Working Group
[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2010Sep/att-0007/
minutes-2010-09-01.html#item08
------ End of Forwarded Message