Armed police freed 11 tigers, 3 lions, and 3 bears from captivity — and that was just the beginning

In a small animal sanctuary 50 miles south of Buffalo, tigers
paced back and forth around the rotting carcass of a dead cat.
Flies swarmed around piles of excrement. One tiger, in a cage next to two female
lions, was missing most of her tail and one ear.

Rusty screws and plywood supported ramshackle metal cages.
Several big cats showed signs of cataracts, and, according to
people who were on the scene, they hadn't been given food or
water for some time.

The site, an animal sanctuary known as JNK's Call of the Wild,
had fallen into disrepair after a death months before left
the surviving owner unable to provide for the animals.

Along with dogs, cats, pigs, rabbits, and a horse, the
Sinclairville, New York, facility held 11 tigers, three lions,
three bears, and two wolves — all malnourished.

On May 27, 2014, armed officials from federal and state agencies
as well as rescue officers from the International Fund for Animal
Welfare (IFAW) put a dangerous plan into action: They executed a search
warrant to seize all the animals and shut the whole
place down.

Moving a tiger isn't easy, but moving more than a dozen large,
exotic, dangerous animals is a potentially deadly logistical
nightmare.

"It was handled like a military operation," says Gail A'Brunzo,
wildlife-rescue manager for IFAW.

The stakes were unusually high.

"You don't get much of a second chance if one of those animals
comes after you," she says. "Police were standing around with
high-powered rifles."

While a small, privately owned, and no-longer-maintained facility
that's full of lions, tigers, bears, and other animals might
sound like a crazy, uncommon sort of thing, it's not.

It's
so easy to get exotic animals in the US that there are more
tigers in captivity here than there are in the wild throughout
the world, according to Carson Barylak, who works on legislative
issues for IFAW and heads its Big Cats in Captivity
campaign.

Its goal is to curtail the private ownership of these animals,
allowing legitimate zoos to own big cats, but generally
prohibiting ownership and breeding by private individuals. A bill
— the recently introduced
Senate version is cosponsored by Senator Bernie Sanders —
that would accomplish much of this is currently under
consideration by the Senate's Committee on Environment and Public
Works.

How many of these cats are out there right now, in backyards, in
farms, or in whatever ad-hoc facility someone designs to keep
them in?

"Well over 10,000," says Barylak — and that's mostly tigers with
a good number of lions and smaller groups of leopards and other
wild cats.

How the JNK situation happened

Problems at JNK started long before authorities took action.

The facility was like many in the country, run by private owners
who wanted to care for exotic animals. They'd been in business
for almost 20 years, but as a
series of videos by IFAW on the seizure explain, at some
point things had started to fall apart.

By the end, the animals were just sitting in small, poorly
maintained cages, where investigators said it seemed that
roadkill would occasionally be tossed in to feed them.

As Barylak says, many of the individuals who decide to start a
facility that ends up like JNK mean well at first.

"This isn't clearly a good guys and bad guys kind of thing," she
says. "These people think they are doing something good."

But feeding big cats, bears, wolves, and other animals year after
year gets expensive. They require a significant amount of space
and food — far more than the animals at JNK had. And that's hard
to afford, according to Lynda Sugasa, executive director of
Safe Haven Wildlife
Sanctuary, a Nevada facility that took two of the tigers from
JNK.

"You need enough space, and you need to see that it meets your
budget," says Sugasa. "A lot of sanctuaries start out with good
intentions, but then they get overwhelmed."

Safe Haven is verified by the Global Federation of
Animal Sanctuaries (GFAS), a group that certifies sanctuaries
that aren't buying, selling, or breeding animals as long as they
meet stringent requirements for the quality of care.

It's difficult to get a GFAS certification. A'Brunzo
says that there are good sites that aren't verified or
accredited, but IFAW tries to place animals in GFAS-certified
sites, as it's a pretty reliable sign of quality.

But no one needs GFAS certification to own a tiger. In many
states, there are barely any restrictions at all.

In many states, like New
York, you can't keep big cats as pets even with a permit, but you
can get a USDA exhibitors license and end up owning the animals
if you are going to show them in some way.Skye Gould/Tech Insider

In New York, a relatively strict state in terms of exotic-animal
ownership — you can't just go out and buy a tiger at an auction
or get a permit that lets you privately keep a lion — people can
still get a license from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA)
if they are going to display the animals. Barylak says that
getting that license is an "extraordinarily easy" process that
costs approximately $40.

That USDA exhibitor's license can function as a
loophole that allows people to keep exotic animals if they are
going to display them, even in states like New
York where you technically can't keep big cats as pets.

The USDA does evaluate facilities, but its visits are
sometimes only once per year. Even then, serious violations to
the Animal Welfare Act may not result in any action.

"They can identify violations and still keep [facilities] going
for years," says Lisa Wathne, a captive-wildlife expert at the
Humane Society.

Enforcement is a complicated problem that takes time. Some USDA
inspectors are excellent, according to Cathy Liss, president of
the Animal Welfare Institute. But she says that "enforcement
typically takes too long, and the fines aren't enough" to deter
irresponsible ownership of exotic animals.

The seizure

While experts say that there had been a history of violations at
JNK, the situation had become particularly bad in the six months
before the seizure.

In a video
shot the night before authorities confiscated the animals,
Andrea D'Ambrosio, a USDA inspector who had been evaluating the
situation for over nine years, described it as awful.

"The last time I was there it was disgusting, there was just tons
of rotting carcasses everywhere," she says.

There had been an accident and one of the facility's owners had
died. After that, things deteriorated rapidly.

"It's a pretty sad situation. The owners definitely have cared
about these animals, but they have lost the ability to continue
caring for the animals," Kelly Donithan, the IFAW
wildlife-rescue-program officer who was on site, told
WIVB at the time. Tech Insider tried several phone numbers
and email addresses for the former owner of the facility, but we
were unable to get a comment.

JNK lost its USDA license in February 2014. The next month,
the New York Department of Environmental Conservation refused to
renew a state permit allowing it to keep the animals.
But since the owners didn't immediately relinquish them,
authorities decided to start formulating the plan for a rescue.
They reached out to the Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries
(GFAS), which contacted the International Fund for Animal Welfare
(IFAW) to facilitate placement.

With everything arranged by the end of May, including homes for
the animals at legitimate sanctuaries in Florida, Nevada,
Colorado, Texas, Indiana, and Pennsylvania, it was time to act.

Fortunately for everyone involved, the actual seizure was easier
than many expected. The sanctuary owners handed over the keys,
and over the course of two days vets and sanctuary personnel were
able to remove the animals.

Most immediately jumped into transport cages baited with fresh
meat. Many hadn't been fed for an extended period of time,
according to IFAW representatives. A few animals, including a
lion and a wolf, had to be tranquilized to get them to leave
their pens.

One tiger was too sick and weak, and had to be euthanized 17
days after arriving at her new home with Big Cat Rescue in
Florida. But for the most part, the animals arrived safely,
settled into the sanctuaries, and received medical care for their
various ailments.

Just the start

A case like JNK's sounds dramatic, but more than anything else,
it's just a manifestation of a much larger issue.

In most cases, there's not even a government record of which
exotic animals are being kept by exhibitors or private owners in
any location. As Wathne, from the Humane Society, said,
facilities are supposed to keep records of animals that come into
and out of their possession, but the USDA doesn't make copies or
keep those records.

That means that there are more than 10,000 big cats out there
that no authority is keeping close tabs on. Barylak, from IFAW,
says that the 10,000 number is a conservative estimate.

A
resettled tiger named Carli now lives at the Safe Haven Wildlife
Sanctuary in Nevada.Courtesy Lynda
Sugasa/Safe Haven Wildlife Sanctuary

Animal-rights groups want legislative changes that essentially
prohibit private buying, selling, and breeding of these animals.
Especially important, they say, is making it illegal to handle
tiger cubs, something the USDA now allows while the cubs are
approximately between eight and 12 weeks old. To work within that
short time window, facilities that regularly offer cub
handling to visitors must continually breed animals.

"If I had to call somebody the bad guys, that's who it would be,"
says Barylak, referring to the breeders who offer cub handling.
"They know what they are doing."

A tiger might
live 10 to 12 years in captivity, which is part of why places
like JNK find it easy to come across animals that need to be
adopted. People who like the idea of a pet tiger at first may
tire quickly of the cost and attention required for their care.
Those who breed them for the purpose of selling cub-handling
opportunities create a steady stream of unwanted adult animals.

Many of these tigers are crossbreeds of different tiger
subspecies, meaning that they aren't valuable for conservation
purposes — i.e., legitimate zoos. That's why places like JNK, and
other sanctuaries that may or may not be able to handle the
burden, step in.

If those sites can't adequately care for the animals, it results
in violations of the Animal Welfare Act and creates situations
where a dangerous animal might
escape and hurt or kill a person. Along with the obvious harm
to animals and risk to people, Barylak says that allowing these
situations to persist undermines US international authority when
trying to crack down on trade in illegal wildlife — often
referred to as
one of the largest black markets in the world, right behind
markets for drugs and guns.

Most of the time, we're not even aware of it when there might be
a problematic situation with dangerous animals in our own
backyard.

As Donithan, the IFAW officer on site for the rescue,
wrote: "In [the] less than 24 hours after the JNK animals
arrived at their forever sanctuaries, half a dozen additional
rescue requests entered my inbox."