Compensating for something?
Like lack of any Legitimacy, or VALID dialogue to support anything your camp is trying to float?

The maturity levels demonstrated in your responses is also appalling; setting an excellent example in illustrating just how low and easily grasped the
fruit hangs for such dispositions as you've demonstrated for requirement to reach, and come to such conclusions.
You really should be quite ashamed and embarrassed in flaunting such immaturity.

As to my dialogue;
My points are clear.
My position is supported.
There is no requirement for you to believe or accept.
I've stated my position.
I stand by my position.

If anyone cares to refute that position with legitimate inquisition of the topic, such parties can and will continue to enjoy the company of my own
interrogative.
A lack of any additional reply, however, should be sure sign that no forthcoming provocation is worthy of any semblance approaching legitimacy such to
merit reply.

Interesting that you didn't even attempt to deal with the solid evidence and points I mentioned.

As to my multiple posts . . . I see you haven't been registered very long. Perhaps you are unaware that it's my style to go through a thread I'm
interested in and comment on as many posts as strike my mood to comment on. It might be 4 or 5 or 20. It's one of my recreational activities.

The Conehead Skulls of Peru: Alien, Ape or a Lost Human Species?
.
Thursday, September 19, 2013
.

The conehead skulls of Peru have been dismissed as the result of 'binding,' but these are not bound skulls. In fact, they aren't even human skulls.
They do not have the right bone structure to be human and they have far larger brain cases. In fact, the native
practice of skull binding may have represented an effort to make themselves appear more like these creatures.

.

Skulls found in Paracas district, in the same state as the Nazcar lines in Peru, have many skeletal differences in comparison to a normal human skull,
and this suggests that the elongation in their case could have been a natural phenomenon and not artificially induced. A normal human skull possesses
three cranial plates, the frontal plate and two parietal plates, but the Paracus skulls have only two, one frontal and one parietal. The volume of the
skull is 25% larger than an average human skull; the nose and eye sockets are larger, and there are two holes suggesting a nerve supply feeding the
back of the skull, which is not a typical human feature. The bone of the skull is also much thicker than that of a normal human skull.
.

So artificial skull elongation as part of an elaborate 'self-enhancement' procedure does not explain the difference in overall volume or the other
differential features seen in these cases, including larger jaws and fewer teeth. Even so, anthropologists still remain unconvinced that the skulls
are from an extraterrestrial race.
.

In 2011, however, Renato Davila Riquelme of the Privado Ritos Andinos museum in Cuzco, Peru, found two small mummies in the village of Andahuaylillas,
a settlement which used to be part of the Inca empire. The new remains had huge skulls which were almost the same size as their 20inch bodies. A
fontanelle, or small hole, was noted in the skulls, suggesting that these were the bodies of children, but this theory was confused by the fact that
the skulls contained fully developed adult molars.. Hydrocephaly has been mooted as a possible cause for the misshapen heads, but medical
professionals who have since examined the skulls stated that this explanation was not consistent with the deformity observed.

Skull has soft spot, found in infants, yet also two large molars, found in older humans

Three anthropologists agree: 'It is not a human being'

By PAUL MILLIGAN

UPDATED: 14:59 EST, 24 November 2011
.

A mummified elongated skull found in Peru could finally prove the existence of aliens.
The strangely shaped head - almost as big as its 50cm (20in) body - has baffled anthropologists.
It was one of two sets of remains found in the city of Andahuaylillas in the southern province of Quispicanchi.
.

The skeletal sets were discovered by Renato Davila Riquelme, who works for the Privado Ritos Andinos museum in Cusco in south-eastern Peru.
He said that that the eye cavities are far larger than normally seen in humans.

I sent, and will send more molar teeth to him, which are perfect for testing, since the DNA is safely protected in the pulp in the interior of each
tooth.

. . .

Foerster: Simply put, to be blown away, and to throw their preconceived notions, and any history books in the garbage. We have a lot of proof that
some of the most famous stone megalithic buildings in Peru and Bolivia are as much as 15,000 years old, and were not made by the Inca, but more
ancient and auburn elongated skull people, some of whom were called the Viracochan. Recent tours I have done have included British and American
engineers who can clearly state that the bronze chisels and stone hammers of the Inca, found in archaeological digs could not have made these
structures, whose immense scale defy belief, and who are fitted together without mortar; in some cases a human hair can't fit between these massive
stones, some weighing more than 100 tons.

. . .

Foerster: There is no chance that the fetal skull was compressed after death. All of the elongated skull people were of noble royal blood, and were
very carefully buried.

Examiner: Do you believe these skulls are the remains of aliens from another planet?

Foerster: There is a possibility that these are in fact human/alien hybrids, but only DNA testing can prove that. If there are DNA strands from them
that don't match the international human genome data base, which they will be compared against, then we have real "smoking gun" data showing that
aliens once may have visited this planet, and mixed with humans, or protohumans.
. . .

NOTE: I realize that Foerster is not part of some folks little fat-headed club of high priests of the religion of Scientism and therefore is only to
be derided by such folks as beyond the pale of "sane" or "rational" fair-minded consideration as a source of anything mature or worthy of interest
or attention.

my expectation is that this sort of disclosure will continue to incrementally escalate . . . until the fallen angel/ET critters leap full bore onto
the world stage in concert and in league with the globalist oligarchy toward OVERT establishment of the long predicted and long in-the-works global
tyrannical government.

So, regardless of whatever initial factors some see as dubious about the Peru skull investigations, I expect them to stand the test of time and to
become even more . . . 'out there' than they are currently.

I realize that folks addicted to worshiping at the altar of the religion of scientism will not be convinced until a UFO or whatever such symbolically
'lands in their laps and castrates them.'

Nothing new on that score.

= = =

AT least the ARCHEOLOGY NEWS NETWORK is somewhat facing the question with perhaps a shred of fair-mindedness:

The first pics at the following link show some interesting comparisons. The first one shows an elongated skull that appears to have about double the
brain capacity of normal or manipulated human skulls:

Of course, I DO realize that even a LIST of SOLID tangible FACTS don't stand a chance against the fat-headed, immature dogma of the religion of
Scientism and their haughty high priests, priestesses and acolytes.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.