P.S.:I liked how you put the "musi" into "kalama musi".I wouldn't combine "tu" and "wan" into one symbol, because that would mean "one pair" (or "a one-ish two"), which is not "three". In other words, "wan" is not a modifier here, is it? And, the combination of symbols happens with the modifier above or inside the previous symbol (e.g. "toki pona" with "pona" within and "kalama musi" with "musi" above), whereas your "tu wan" puts "wan" to the right of "tu". ("wan" could be in between the two lines of "tu", but again, I wouldn't combine them in the first place in order to say "three", but in order to say "one pair".)I would have prefered to write "toki-pona" instead of "tokipona". (Think of "kala-ma" vs. "kalama".)

The “tu wan” glyph isn't really a compound glyph, it's more like a ligature. Same for “luka luka” and “tu-tu”. They're used for clarification when writing numerals, I wouldn't really use them in a sentence. (Even though I have to admit that I did that at first.)You can see how I used them in my transcription of The little Prince:https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BwU6c9zm6SqeRUtYVW92cHY1YjA

I didn't think about the “kala-ma” scenario (what would kala-ma mean ? Land fish ?)But as of now, that compound glyph doesn't exist, I only made the well know ones like “tomo-tawa”.If it exists one day, I might change the programing. For now you have to write them separately.

(Edit: the “hyphen” system you suggested is now completely implemented)

Last edited by jan Same on Wed Apr 12, 2017 1:50 am, edited 1 time in total.