02-Dec-2010 – Last rites for the Euro? Nikki SINCLAIRE MEP!There is every possibility that Greece will step in demanding more of theirprofligacy & dishonesty is funded BEFORE Spain bankrupts The EU with their claim!

Portugal’s inevitable claim can be sustained Ireland can NEVER Pay off their debts!

Last rites for the Euro?

I can reveal that last week, whilst MEPs were in Strasbourg, a delegation from the European Commission paid a visit to London for hush-hush high level discussions with the British government concerning the perilous state of the Euro.

The same week, on Thursday, the heads of the Commission’s Directorates were given orders not to discuss the Euro, or to speculate on its future, under any circumstances.

Just how bad is the economic crisis in the EU? Worse than the Commission would have us believe, it would appear. In the last hour it has been announced that three member states have had to apply for aid in order to deal with rising unemployment.

EU adjustment Fund aid worth more than €8.7 million for workers in Spain, Poland and the Netherlands was approved by Parliament’s Budgets Committee this morning.

In total, 2,312 redundant workers (retail trade, car and construction sectors) in Spain, 779 former workers in the car and ship building industry in Poland and 613 ex-employees in the ICT sector in the Netherlands are set to receive support.

The Spanish authorities applied for aid to unemployed workers in three regions: Valencia (several firms in the construction and textile sector), Catalonia (the Lear company, producing electrical equipment for cars) and Aragón (several firms in the retail trade sector).

The two Polish applications concern the Wielkopolskie province (two firms in the car industry) and the H.Cegielski-Poznań company, the only Polish manufacturer of marine engines, plus its suppliers.

The Dutch application is for two ICT companies, Getronics and HP, in the region of Noord Holland.

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque in POWER& the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

A SAD DAY for JUSTICE as The SUPREME COURT BEFOULS THE LAW!

To QUOTE Godfrey Bloom on UKIP’s Official Web Site:

UKIP: Bloom blast for shoplifter let-off

From the official website:

UKIP MEP Godfrey Bloom has expressed disbelief at a police scheme which asks shopkeepers not to report thefts of less than £20.

Humberside Police said retailers in North East Lincolnshire should instead keep a diary of minor value thefts, rather than report the crimes immediately.

You may be sufficiently interested to read the article in The Yorkshire Post CLICK HERE

However whilst the Law Makers are in full cry hunting down miscreants who break the law for small sums of money it would seem those self same law makers on their feather bedded fat cat salaries doing and achieving the sum total of sod all for our Country whilst strutting around like little emperors on incomes they clearly find of orgasmic proportions for only being seen to do anything at election time whilst obscenely stuffing their pockets and betraying every principle of those who elect them!

We note that Tom Wise UKIP MEP was actually found guilty of stealing public money and sentenced to 2 years in Jail last November – this abuse of trust, abuse of office and fraudulent deception was rightly punished.

There are astonishingly some without any understanding of morality and without ethics who have even clamoured for this fat, greedy and despicable low life to be officially pardoned BECAUSE he was only doing what all the others do! What an obscene reflection on the ghastly people who have so greedily taken the foreign cash for their own comfort in treacherous betrayal of these United Kingdoms.

Tom Wise was sentenced to 2 years in prison for his crime yet being a law maker that didn’t last long and he was out swanning around the countryside in May and was officially released on Friday last – WHAT AN OBSCENITY, WHAT A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE indeed The Law is as Charles Dickens wrote ‘An Ass, an Idiot’!

Clearly there is an advantage in being one of the Law makers as it is obviously we no live in a democracy governed in justice under law.

I guess there is nothing new in the fact that ‘The law is an ass, an idiot’ as Mr. Bumble presciently said of The Judgement of the Supreme Court as handed down today, which clearly shows The Bench with Lord Phillips Presiding to be more than willing to show themselves as asses in a ratio of 4 to 3.

That UKIP has every reason to be extatic and crow loudly every proud citizen who values these United Kingdoms must weep at this clear judgement of asses.

JUDGMENTR (on the application of the Electoral Commission)(Respondent) v City of Westminster MagistratesCourt (Respondent) and The United KingdomIndependence Party (Appellant)

01In about February 2005 (as I recall) I contacted David Lott Chairman of UKIP at the time, Nigel Farage MEP defacto leader at the time (as ever!) and John de Rorke believed to be Treasurer at the time and advised them that Alan Bowne a professional gambler, ex bookie and small business owner who had been funding UKIP on a generous personal basis had dropped off of The Electoral Register. It was believed that he had done so as he was in the midst of an acrimonious divorce from his wife and living with his new mistress one of his betting shop managers.

02I reminded them how easy it was to solve the problem as they had previously with the football club owner to whom they refunded the donation and re-accepted it from a permissible source as they had done previously CLICK HERE clearly this would have given them a huge amount of additional excellent publicity! Andrew Smith took over as treasurer to enter into a conspiracy of deliberate obfuscation with Nigel Farage and as ‘e’Mails clearly show.

03In the year running up to February 2007 The Electoral Commission approached UKIP literally dozens of times with phone calls, letters, ‘e’Mails and face to face meetings but UKIP having MEPs and being Law Makers saw themselves as far more important than the footing laws for other people and deliberately ignored and insulted the officials paid and empowered to seek to enforce the laws imposed by The EU.As you can see here UKIP had no interest in the law and one can clearly see this in Andrew Smith’s planning ways to dupe the authorities appointed to oversee the law:

Thank you Geoffrey for organising the meeting. We need to give theElectoral Commission every reason to believe we are serious aboutcompliance, in order to provide the next Party Treasurer with a goodstory to tell when we next fail to meet the statutory requirements.

For more details CLICK HERE there is as has become clear no limit to the lies, dishonesty and corruption of UKIP’s self serving, self enriching trash that has risen to the top – whether criminal money laundering as with Stuart Agnew, Tom Wise or Lord Pearson or stealing public money as with Stuart Agnew & David Bannerman.For more examples of UKIP’s endemic and institutionalised dishonesty and corruption:CLICK HERE& HEREOr HERE& HEREalso HERE& HERE& HERE& HEREOr HEREand HEREThere is a huge amount more about UKIP’s corruption HERE

Clearly there is a great deal more that shows UKIP is beyond any doubt unfit for purpose as shown in the General Election with their risible failure to get anywhere near any single seat and the abject humiliation of the Party by the humiliating defeat of their leader Nigel Farage to get other than a joke position whilst UKIP’s corrupt and dishonest titular leader Lord Pearson made a complete arse of himself and the party by campaigning for his old chums in The Tory Party.

For confirmation of just how useless UKIP are with their racist and anti Jewish principles and pro EU membership stance for violence and abuse in the EU whilst actively campaigning to raise the profile of the BNP in Britain – just look at what the electorate at large think of them and study their results in local elections.

Out of some 19,000 elected offices in Britain UKIP would seem to have scraped together less than 30 positions!

04UKIP commenced publicly insulting The Electoral Commission leaving the Commission with absolutely no alternative but Court – UKIP also insulted the authorities with regard to donations to the Lib.Dims. which although morally questionable were within the letter of the law and the Lib.Dims. had made strenuous efforts to aid El.Com. & SFO whilst ensuring they stayed within the law.

05 In February 2007 the Electoral Commission decided to seek forfeiture from the United Kingdom Independence Party of donations amounting to £367,697 from Alan Bown and Dick Horsnell’s company from the Isle of Man as I recall Nightech Ltd. These 67 separate donations were received between December 2004 and January 2006. These were from impermissible sources as Mr. Bown was not on the electoral register at the time of making the donations and Nightech was not registered in the UK under the Companies Act 1985.

06The application by the Commission for a court order for forfeiture was heard at Westminster Magistrates Court in July 2007. In August 2007 the District Judge ordered that UKIP should forfeit £14,481 of donations given to the party by Alan Bown. The Judge also ordered them to forfeit the £4,000 from Nightech ltd.A very lenient and compromise sentence, which stretched the law but clearly to cogniscenece of the spirit and the intent of the law above the letter of the law. A judgement I believe The Electoral Commission found acceptable until Nigel Farage started to mock them and accuse them of losing because they were bullying UKIP whilst favouring other parties! Not a very smart move from the barrow boy!

07Given that the District Judge did not order forfeiture of the full amount, although they found all donation in question to be from impermissible sources, on 28 August 2007 the Electoral Commission had no choice in the light of Nigel Farage’s childish behaviour but to apply to the High Court to review the Magistrates Court judgment to ensure there was clarity in how the law should be applied.

08On 22 January 2009, the High Court upheld the Commission’s appeal and ordered the re-hearing of the case at Westminster Magistrate’s Court. However, the Commission considered that the High Court provided insufficient clarity for political parties as to how the rules should be applied. The Commission applied to the Court of Appeal to review the High Court judgement.

09On 19 October 2009, the Court of Appeal unanimously upheld the Commission’s appeal concluding that, in all but exceptional circumstances, political parties should give up in full donations accepted from impermissible sources. UKIP appealed to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court hearing took place on 8 and 9 June 2010.

JUNIUS unsurprisingly has a similar opinion but a different take on this at CLICK HERE

There is absolutely no doubt in the judgement of any ethical individual of principle that UKIP is and was guilty and it is clear even The Supreme Court found them guilty but in a judgement clearly exceeding their duty and responsibility the new EU style Justice of the supreme court supreme over absolutely nothing that now has stature, as it is answerable not to the British people, not to the British House of Commons, nor to the House of Lords or Monarch but the SUPREME COURT of these United Kingdoms is now in the hands of its masters The EU – which must please Nigel Farage, Lord Pearson and the rest of the pond life and solids that have floated to the top of UKIP’s septic tank.

And didn’t Barbara Castle’s young Communist protege do well, after her training and fast tracking via Chile – he even managed to do away with British Justice – introducing the EU/Communist style of legal enforcement with a regional supreme court from which appeal it to the Central Soviet’s Courts of The EU.

Barbara Castle’s other Communist protege, after his training as he rose through the ranks of his Union to intensive lessons as an MEP, then returned to run the Government from the back – fronted by his puppets whilst aided by Ruth Kelly via Alpha and Julia Middleton via Common Purpose but we know from Corpus Juris that:

‘What we propose is a set of penal rules, which constitute a kind of corpus juris, limited to the penal protection of the European Union, designed to ensure, in a largely inified European area, a fairer, simpler and more efficient system of repression‘

and didn’t they do well destroying British Justice and enforcing EU regional supreme courts even if Prescot did have to put up with Blair’s silly jokes about him!

The EU’s gaulleiter Court dispensing EU judgements in flagrant disregard for Justice is the London Regional Supreme Court of The EU – which found UKIP Guilty as charged but sided with the Westminster Magistrate’s Court who initially imposed a forfeit of £14,000 of the money donated by Alan Bown and £4,000 donated by Dick Horsnell’s Isle of Man Company – when you think Nigel Farage deposited £250,000 into his own Isle of Man account it does rather pale into insignificance I guess – The money payable in forfeit equates to about what Nigel Farage has scammed for his wife as a so called salary for about 7 months!

I presume that in that UKIP were technically found guilty they will be liable for the costs – even so that could amount to more than ‘walking money’ even for a lard arsed Judge or a useless MEP.

This case has cost UKIP a huge amount in credibility and today the party is in no way vindicated – all of this should have been avoided but because of the low caliber of leadership and the barrow boy mentality of its utterly incompetent leader Nigel Farage all this damage has been done and all the costs have been incurred and all because UKIP were too dishonest and too stupid to negotiate.

Sure thing that the higher up the tree the monkey climbs the more you see its Rs – this probably more than any other of Nigel Farage’s stupid and childish stunts over the years has exposed him for the complete fool he surely is a silly little man with absolutely no OQ, no leadership ability, no honour, no integrity, no ethics and no gravitas – a mere fool.

As I have ALWAYS said, since my first involvement with UKIP some 14 years ago – I am a devoted backer of the principles and ethics of UKIP and would back Nigel Farage to the hilt as the party’s performing monkey but would oppose him totally if he ever stood for leader as he has absolutely no principles and is a mere barrow boy without attributes to lead – at the moment UKIP has no ethics and is without principles and just look at the filth and the scum it has gathered around it.

You can find a copy of the extremely dubious judgement of the supreme clowns:CLICK HEREand for the summary: CLICK HEREand for The Electoral Commission’s Press Release CLICK HERE

We know that even in the days of the medieval foundations of law they had an understanding of it:

For a short time the braying is likely to be the asses that have been found guilty but have got off lightly – in the end it is we the citizens who are the losers when the law is held in contempt and then we find justice can not be trusted our society is devalued.

When justice is devalued and those who make the law are those who abuse it clearly it is us who are the losers.

This verdict is beyond doubt perverse and not in the interest of justice even if it does suit the masters of the courts to keep the EU’s clowns in position damaging the EUroSceptic movement and befouling the body politic merely to undermine opposition to the EU and also to act as a foil for the BNP who would be the main beneficiaries of the demise of UKIP – who increasingly are the EU’s foil of fools as the BNP in blazers increasingly with its idiotic Islamaphobia partnership in Racism, extremism, anti Judaism and sexual intollerance – The EU will be pleased with their servants in the Regional Courts!

But then again we the people never wanted EU standards of justice, though they clearly suit UKIP, with their new found concept of a panel of appointed judges making law on the hoof based upon personal opinions and not the law – since when was the spirit of the law much other than an expensive whisky with lunch!

Are we to assume that UKIP has set a prescedent whereby having been denied the right to appeal to The House of Lords UKIP used the new EU system of Justice, in contempt of our appeal courts and applied direct to The EU’s Regional supreme Court – that being the case can we assume that their erswhile MEP Ashley Mote may accept the new route they have devised taking advantage of the EU structure of so called justice?

Shall we see The Conservative Party and others now appealing donations they have surrendered or forfeit because unlike UKIP they as law makers sought to uphold, rather than abuse the law.

Indeed the Supreme Court has shown how right was Mr. Bumble of the law:

Seemingly we have reverted to Elizabethan Law albeit in this Elizabeths 57th year as monarch! Where EU may read for ecclesiatical:

Those Elizabethans who challenged the law faced a kind of double jeopardy: there were two legal systems, each with its laws, officers, trials–and punishments. The ecclesiastical courts tried such crimes as sexual offences: adultery, fornication, bigamy, and so on. Minor officials (beadles, promoters) spied out offences, often at the prompting of neighbours; those who were accused were required to collect a certain number of character references from distinguished local people to be acquitted. The system was ripe for abuse and petty vengeance. (Petty–and petting–crime*.) The punishments often involved public humiliation: the pillory; or standing at the church door or market in a penitential gown for a certain number of times.

Consider the damage done to our society and we surely have the braying ass:

Bray not too soon as not only are the 5 originally named MEPs far from out of the woods as far as investigation of their criminality and I gather Derek Clarke is already practicing shuffling around in slippers and sleeping in noisy committee meetings despite long periods of sleep in his cell in the Parliament.

Then of course to add to that UKIP MEPs Stuart Agnew and David Bannerman are under investigation for fraudullently obtaining tax payers’ money and embezzling it now more commonly known as ‘Money Laundering’ it for their own purposes as exposed by Daniel Foggo and his associates at The Sunday Times.

That leads us on to the next probable Eletoral Commission case against UKIP related to the open declarations of the amounts of money available for the General Election which although in the written record do not seem to tally by a long way with the declarations made and of course their investigations of the clearly criminal admissions of Lord Pearson, Stuary Agnew and peripherally Nigel Farage as the kindly explained on video and tape how they laundered money to dupe The Electoral Commission as they set out to extract money from a young lady on Daniel Foggo’s team.

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque in POWER& the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

Are UKIP MEPs Banking on the Bankruptcy of the Party?

MIGHT THAT BE THE PLAN for THE EFD?THAT WOULD EXPLAIN WHY THEY SHAMEFULY &DISHONOURABLY PROSTITUTED THEMSELVESTO RACISM, VIOLENCE, ANTI JUDAISM,

SEXUAL INTOLERANCE & pro EU MEMBERSHIP!

Hi,

it is pleasing to note, though the English is more studied 😉 that at least someone is paying attention to my various blogs and ‘e’Mails.

Strangely I have been asked by 3 people in the last 2 days (2 of whom claim to have more than adequate money) whether I believe that UKIP as a brand would be worth buying.

I have in all 3 cases stated that in my personal opinion with Farage there is absolutely no point and without Farage there is absolutely no one of any damned use – To be fair he has made sure no one of ability could remain to challenge him but as in any commercial takeover the first question is who do you feel to be indispensable to this organisation. From a shortlist of 5 fire the one who is highest profile – it will remove the prima donna and it will concentrate the mninds of the others.

Unfortunately in UKIP beyond Farage there is absolutely no body you would not be worse off keeping amongst the top 50 known members – ABSOLUTELY no-one. They are merely the scum that has floated to the top in Farage’s septic tank and not a single solitary trustworthy individual of merit remains.

It is then a matter of what do you wish to buy?I believe if you buy MORE than the name, the web sites and the mailing list you are buying problems.Once you buy the name the mailing list is of little value as due to UKIP’s shoddy and irresponsible disregard for Courts, iontegrity, morality and the law there are copies all over the place. Once you own the name then I hazzard a guess someone will step forward with a full list trying to curry favour – The mailing list at that stage is worth no more than £1,000.

So for all the claims of the value of the brand name without Farage there is absolutely no party and with Farage there is absolutely no future – that puts the value at probably 50% or maybe double the Receivers costs which would be somewhere between £20 or £30K.

As for the MEPs there isn’t a single one worth keeping as they have made it very clear without exception they are utterly useless, weak, venal and corrupt. The sooner they are gone the better but one needs to make sure that Wee Willie’s wife doesn’t decide to buy the Party for him to keep him from under foot. A measure of the commitment of the MEPs would be to have a close look at their donations to the party – is it a comfortable income for them or a vehicle they believe in. When ONE MEP’s wife can sell off a spare flat in Sydney harbour for 13 MILLIONS does the total contribution from ALL of the MEPs amount to a ‘tithe’?

No I thought not, but I have a feeling The Supreme Court could require that shortly!

In early June the Appeal Court will decide whether the judgement made against UKIP concerning illegal donations is upheld or not.

If it is, UKIP could be facing a bill of around £1,000,000

We believe that with the departure of Stuart Wheeler, UKIP is unlikely to be able to pay the debt.

It has been suggested to us by Finance experts that the logical course of action is to allow the Party to go bust and then repurchase it from the Receiver at a ‘knockdown’ price

Now, we don’t know whether the Electoral Commission would allow this (or can even stop it).

This has led us to speculate, whether UKIP MEPs have raised the money or not, they may let the Party fail owing significant debts and then repurchase it again. They may have to use a ‘front man or woman’ in order to distance themselves from it, thereby claiming no manipulation.

We would suggest that any other interested Parties should consider making the purchase themselves, and prevent the hapless, (and in our view), incompetent, existing MEPS to return; but to use the brand to develop a New re-invigorated Party with new people and a New UK Agenda based on winning seats through Segmentation, Targetting and Positioning as opposed to the current non-strategy of fighting all seats and squandering resources.