But just as good as the cock riding and then the self-facial and then the cumming in the ass is actually the cock sucking in the beginning. Because if you’ve seen how Curtis handles cock, you know what I mean. There came (pun intended) a point in the clip between like the five and six minute mark when I had to turn off my computer and walk away.

After how he made Ethan’s disappear and now Liev’s…it’s clear that Curtis is some sort of cocksucker magician:

I don’t know which one he’s able to open wider…his mouth or his asshole?

WOW the same old models now brought to us with barebacking…does SeanCody think that this makes it HOTTER…because it does not…we have seen Curtis suck on Ethan’s giant cock with no problem and we have seen him getting fucked countless times…the lack of condoms does not make up for the lack of new faces and new positions…GRADE=D-

So, how are we supposed to react to this? Seriously. Are we supposed to hope that he’s getting HIV? Are we supposed to hope that he’s not, but be secretly excited that he might be? Are we just supposed to jack off to it and call it “hotter” as the unsafe porn fans frequently do? Do we get a little sick to our stomachs because we are subjecting these kids to debilitating illnesses just to turn us on? Do we write SeanCody and tell them that we appreciate their justification that they are doing “everything they can” to test people and this is the safest they can make it? (Other than actually being safe, of course) Do we ask if they are going to provide someone who seroconverts with a lifetime of health insurance?
I’d just like one person who prefers unsafe porn, just one, to explain to me how it is worth it. Just logically tell me, without emotion or namecalling or histrionics, how one human’s health and safety is worth less than your personal jack-off pleasure.

A twist on the an old adage: which came first: bareback scenes or fans of bareback scenes? I’m going to go with bareback scenes. These guys choose to do this. They are over the age of 18 and fully able to consent. You put all the blame on the fans, but don’t take into account that these guys volunteer to do this. We, fans, aren’t tying them up and making them do it. If you don’t like bareback scenes, you don’t have to watch them. It’s literally as simple as that.

N – you are truly ignorant if you think these guys “volunteer to do this!” They in fact are paid to do this and I would venture to say that without compensation these guys would NOT be filming anything. It is, in my opinion, a horrible shame that money being waived in front of these young men is all the incentive they need to put their health at risk. I have heard that models shooting bareback are being paid significantly higher wages than non-bareback models. Sure, SC and all the other companies shooting bareback will say they are doing “all they can” to protect the models through testing, etc. Whatever they need to tell themselves to be able to sleep well at night – I call BS! But as everyone should know, nothing is 100% safe. Yes, even a condom is not 100% safe. But, if I were a model I would rather be 99% sure I was not going to be infected rather than play Russian Roulette by having anal sex without a condom. Yes, they are 18 years of age or older and therefore they have chosen to put themselves at risk. It is just a crying shame that they are so naive and ignorant enough to put their lives at risk for the instant gratification of money. What can we do about it? Probably not much…. But, I used to be a loyal subscriber to SC and when the 1st Bareback scene was posted I cancelled my membership.

Oh bullshit. Show me the cancellation email. Prove it. And, news flash, people get paid lots of money to do all sorts of things you probably find morally wrong. So, if you think everyone who does something you object to is just naive and ignorant and being bribed, why hold anyone personally responsible for anything, ever?

Logical argument: because lack of condoms does not automatically translate into disease. The overwhelming majority of us do not come out the womb HIV or STD positive, so there is no intrinsic link between sex without a condom and disease acquisition. The link is the people and their education about STD’s and willingness and LACK THEREOF to protect themselves even in the absence of a condom. But of course that points the finger there, where it belongs. Hyperbolic anti-bareback critics can’t see the forest for the trees. They see a video without condoms and automatically go into alarm mode, not thinking of any alternative theories approaches to the issue. Bareback is evil. Case closed.