Maxime de la Rocheterie on Marie-Antoinette

"She was not a guilty woman, neither was she a saint; she was an upright, charming woman, a little frivolous, somewhat impulsive, but always pure; she was a queen, at times ardent in her fancies for her favourites and thoughtless in her policy, but proud and full of energy; a thorough woman in her winsome ways and tenderness of heart, until she became a martyr."

John Wilson Croker on Marie-Antoinette

"We have followed the history of Marie Antoinette with the greatest diligence and scrupulosity. We have lived in those times. We have talked with some of her friends and some of her enemies; we have read, certainly not all, but hundreds of the libels written against her; and we have, in short, examined her life with– if we may be allowed to say so of ourselves– something of the accuracy of contemporaries, the diligence of inquirers, and the impartiality of historians, all combined; and we feel it our duty to declare, in as a solemn a manner as literature admits of, our well-matured opinion that every reproach against the morals of the queen was a gross calumny– that she was, as we have said, one of the purest of human beings."

Edmund Burke on Marie-Antoinette

"It is now sixteen or seventeen years since I saw the queen of France, then dauphiness, at Versailles; and surely there never lighted on this orb, which she hardly seemed to touch, a more delightful vision. I saw her just above the horizon, decorating and cheering the elevated sphere she had just begun to move in, glittering like a morning star full of life and splendor and joy. Oh, what a revolution....Little did I dream that I should have lived to see such disasters fall upon her, in a nation of gallant men, in a nation of men of honor and of cavaliers! I thought ten thousand swords must have leaped from their scabbards, to avenge even a look which threatened her with insult. But the age of chivalry is gone; that of sophisters, economists, and calculators has succeeded...."

~Edmund Burke, October 1790

A Note on Reviews

Unless otherwise noted, any books I review on this blog I have either purchased or borrowed from the library, and I do not receive any compensation (monetary or in-kind) for the reviews.

Translate

Welcome, Guests!

Wikio Ranking

Sunday, October 9, 2016

As election day approaches, Denver Archbishop Samuel J. Aquila has published an article
in his diocesan newspaper, urging Catholics to remember that no issue
should be more important to them than the question of life and death for
the unborn. While making it clear that he has an “aversion” to both candidates,
Aquila nonetheless suggests that the election will come down to choosing
the “lesser of two evils,” and for him, that means the party that is
most likely to defend unborn life.

Aquila doesn’t leave the matter in the abstract but helps readers
analyze the platforms of the two major parties, especially as regards
the issues that affect Christians most closely. While Catholic prelates go to great lengths to appear neutral at
election time-eschewing the endorsement of any particular candidate or
party-Aquila does all but tell his readers that come November, he will
be pulling the Republican lever. Referring to a recent dinner party where he was asked for guidance on
whom to vote for, the Archbishop laid out what he considers to be the
essential facts for Catholic voters to consider.

Beyond the candidates themselves, Aquila said, Catholics “need to
reflect on the platforms of both parties, with an emphasis on the human
life issues,” because “Catholics in good conscience cannot support
candidates who will advance abortion.” Throughout his article, the archbishop seems to take for granted that
the election will come down to the two major parties, so he doesn’t
even bother speaking about third-party candidates, which many have
accurately described as the equivalent of not voting at all. Aquila said that while the Democratic Party has continued to tilt
ever more pro-abortion, the Republican platform has become progressively
more pro-life.

The most important platform change, he said, is that this year the
Democratic party is calling for the overturning of the Hyde Amendment,
which “prohibits federal taxpayer money from being used for abortion.”
If they succeed, American citizens-including Catholics-will be obliged
to support abortion with their tax dollars.

The Democratic platform, he continued, “is aggressively pro-abortion,
not only in funding matters, but in the appointment of only those
judges who will support abortion.” In other words, when it comes down to
the appointment of Supreme Court justices, as well as judges for the
lower courts, the Democrats can be counted on to nominate only
pro-abortion candidates. This isn’t all, however.
The archbishop added that the Democrats also support the repeal of
the Helms Amendment, which “prevents the U.S. from supporting abortion
availability overseas.” If repealed, U.S. citizens may not be only
funding abortions on American soil, but abroad as well, something
Hillary Clinton has pushed for years.

Conversely, he noted, “the Republican party platform is supportive of
the Hyde Amendment and just this year strengthened its support for life
by calling for the defunding of Planned Parenthood, banning
dismemberment abortion and opposing assisted suicide.” (Read more.)

Join the Party on FB!

The Joy of Networking

My Friends

Disclaimer

The fact that a link is provided here in no way constitutes an endorsement of everything on the other end of the link.

Comments Policy

Comments are moderated. If a comment is not published, it may be due to a technical error. At any rate, do not take offense; it is nothing personal. Slanderous comments will not be published. Anonymity may be tolerated, but politeness is required.

I would like to respond to every comment but my schedule renders it impossible to do so. Please know that I appreciate those who take the time to share their thoughts.