Sy: are the WS2 fullerenes compatible as an ad mix to other lubricants? If so where does one find small quantities to experiment with? Do you have any experience with conventional and or damping grease and would The WS2 fullerenes be a viable additive there to decrease friction also? In the case of my inverted bearing where grease is a necessity anything that will lower friction is a plus. Thanks.

The fullerenes act as very small ball bearings- they have high compressive strength and dynamically telescope in and out as the lube mechanism. There's some nice info on ApNano's site. You should be able to order relatively small quantities directly from them. You can load them in pretty heavily to most oil bases and make a nice, non-flowable grease.

__________________
"Pity, wrath, heroism, filled them, but the power of putting two and two together was annihilated."- EM Forster

Wish to share (part of) a recent conversation still on-going with MJ, a Canadian friend, very well informed, almost "obsessed" and passionate enough to quite deeply understand the several parts which compose the puzzle.

Quote:

"I think that a TT bearing lubricant must provide a conductive path for static charge build up. That way the charge at the stylus tip can flow to the platter then to the bearing and finally to ground. This presumes that you provide a path from the disk surface to the platter surface to the bearing assembly.

Yes no matter what material you use for the bearing assembly there will be compression and deformation in the metal parts. Lubricants not only provide for a no metal to metal contact and low friction but they also provide damping to the system.

I spoke with an application engineer at the HQ of Power Up Lubricants. I asked him to explain how moly type lubricants work. I had been under the impression that they worked into the metal surface and bonded there filling in any small surface irregularities in effect leaving the surface smoother. That is not the case. Moly products actually form a molecular matrix which envelopes the structure. Should there be any impact that coating can crack and break open which then leaves the equivalent of a rough spot until the moly components rebuild which takes some time to do. Your graphite infused lubricant while not as slippery as a moly product does not suffer the same issue as the moly as it does not encapsulate the metal surface. It simply provides a layer of slippery graphite and there is never any chance of roughness as with the moly. I will say that if a bearing is left undisturbed the moly product should work very well. But my impression is that the moly while slippery than graphite will not damp as effectively as the graphite. I would guess the graphite would have the sonic edge over a moly product. You could however add about 3% of a moly additive to your graphite lubricant and get the best of both.

Now the power Up engineer told me that there product would have a lower coefficient of friction than moly or PTFE loaded lubricants. So you could also experiment with Power Up as an additive to your graphite lubricant to lower the friction while maintaining and improving the damping qualities of the graphite lubricant. Again about a 3% mix would do.

As far as graphite lubricants go I would say that the larger the molecular structure of the graphite particles the better the damping qualities. Graphite is a flaky structure by nature. With the addition of the Power Up additive there is no longer any need to keep the graphite particles small (so as to make them an effective lubricant) they can be made as large as possible to enhance damping qualities. Do you know if the lubricant company who make your black oil provide specific data on the oil? Knowing the composition would make it easier to replicate (or improve on) while adding a superior lubricant at the same time.

I think the easiest way of making a custom task specific lubricant would be to find a top quality graphite based lubricant designed as a damping compound with the same viscosity as your black oil then add in the Power Up additive. Then you have the right weight of lubricant with maximum damping qualities with optimum lubricating qualities all in one bottle."

The fullerenes act as very small ball bearings- they have high compressive strength and dynamically telescope in and out as the lube mechanism. There's some nice info on ApNano's site. You should be able to order relatively small quantities directly from them. You can load them in pretty heavily to most oil bases and make a nice, non-flowable grease.

Sounds ideal for machinery ways. I use a Teflon loaded grease on mine now. Sorry to wander off topic, but are you familiar with this type of application?

Your record picks up/generates static by revolving in air, having a conductive path from record-spindle-bearing well to earth would help reduce/eliminate that build up. a conductive oil may help, particularly if you use a ceramic bearing.

I have the vaguest feeling that my SME 10 builds up less static when I use the metal bearing ball than when i use the ceramic one- could be me being a mentalist however.

I've always thought a path to ground is a good idea. If you look at some tables with MDF plinths, there's no path from the bearing to ground at all. I usually add one with a large bleeder resistor to drain off charge in a controlled manner. Even with an unbroken oil film, I can't imagine a bearing with enough isolation resistance that charge wouldn't drain. OTOH, does belt drive = Van de Graaff generator?

I've got to try some of this nano stuff. My bearings tests to date haven't shown that any lubricant is truly up to a ball/flat point contact bearing. Lube is always forced out of the contact area and scoring occurs. I'm too lazy/stupid/both to work out the Hertzian contact between common bearing materials, but I'll bet the pressures would surprise you on some of the harder materials.

__________________
I may be barking up the wrong tree, but at least I'm barking!