Top Scientist: Fluoride Already Shown to Cause 10,000 Cancer Deaths

Dear Mommy,
Thank you for being as smart as you are and knowing that flouride was "poison" all my life. If it wasn't for the extra hours you put in so you
could afford to buy us spring water (back when it wasn't so readily available), and flouride free toothpaste, who knows what kind of state we might
be in today.

I am now 38 years old and almost 100% flouride free for those entire 38 years.

I read, true or not, that naturally occuring flouride is different from what they add to our water.... (pauses to see if she can find her
source).......

here's a start

41. The chemicals used to fluoridate water are not pharmaceutical grade. Instead, they largely come from the wet scrubbing systems of the
phosphate fertilizer industry. These chemicals (90% of which are sodium fluorosilicate and fluorosilicic acid), are classified hazardous wastes
contaminated with various impurities. Recent testing by the National Sanitation Foundation suggest that the levels of arsenic in these silicon
fluorides are relatively high (up to 1.6 ppb after dilution into public water) and of potential concern (NSF 2000 and Wang 2000). Arsenic is a known
human carcinogen for which there is no safe level. This one contaminant alone could be increasing cancer rates – and unnecessarily so.

Not only is naturally occurring flouride completely different to the chemical waste soup they pull from their scrubbers, only about 3.0% of the
population is receiving naturally occurring fluoride in their water. That means 97% of people are ingesting a toxic waste material. I wrote a
thread about all of this not too long ago:

In 1997, it was shown that fluoridation caused about 10,000 cancer deaths in epidemiological studies by Dr. Dean Burk, former head of the
Cytochemistry Section at the National Cancer Institute and Yiamouyiannis. Despite the findings occurring in 1997, they were not reluctantly released
until 1989. After analyzing the study results in rats, it was found that animals who drank fluoridated water:

First, how does something get released before the findings occured? And second, as said, everything causes cancer these days, probably even the
computer you're using now

Dear Mommy,
Thank you for being as smart as you are and knowing that flouride was "poison" all my life. If it wasn't for the extra hours you put in so you
could afford to buy us spring water (back when it wasn't so readily available), and flouride free toothpaste, who knows what kind of state we might
be in today.

I am now 38 years old and almost 100% flouride free for those entire 38 years.

You so rock!
All my love,
- Your daughter

Getting to 38 is not so difficult. Most health problems dont start until around 40 - 50 years old. Dr. Burke made it to 84 and here we are talking
about him over 2 decades later. I dont think it is so co-incidental. Everyone wants to be the rose in a field of daisies.

I avoid fluoride since it has been shown to accumulate in the pineal gland and calcify it. Idk about you, but I don't like having sections of my brain
rendered inert due to a foreign substance. Especially a part said to be involved in higher order thinking (the "third eye").

The fear or thought of cancer isn't necessary, but I wouldn't doubt if it were true. It's a poison.

It's not a good substance to ingest in any shape or form.

ETA but I'm already effed. I didn't realize this until I was 21 and I was too poor as a child to not use tap water (drunk out of hoses quite often)
and was too ignorant to know the effects of fluoride toothpastes. If I have kids there's a lot I'll do different.

The government already stole my sense of smell when I was a child too. They issued people on the base housing to use a nasal spray which had steroids
in it (and was later found to be harmful). It effed up my olfactory bulb for life.

Going on 17 years without ever whiffing a scent~ I wonder which part of my brain they'll take next.

I have never really looked into flouride relating to cancer or anything until this. But I did notice the other day while I was waiting in line to eat
on post they had a sign showing ten reasons to drink tap water instead of bottled water. One of the reasons was because it has flouride in it (and
flouride is good for you according to them).

Ah yes, an article written by men who have only a journalists understanding of the field which they have chosen to concentrate thier craft on, about a
bit of research that really does not have any substance or scientific rigor applied to it. Well done on all fronts lads.

The fact of the matter is, that this website, the Natural Society, is run by people who have absolutely no connection with actual medicine what so
ever. These are the sort of fellows who would have supported the UTTERLY STUPID actions of the late CEO of Apple, Steve Jobs, in battling his cancer.
Anyone worth listening to was telling the man to get himself dealt with by people who might actually have been able to save his life, rather than
getting his back rubbed, and being immersed in aromatherapy or some other bloody thing.

While I am more than aware that the great majority of our current understanding of medicine is based on the herbalism of our ancestors, and that is
something I respect. However, medical science has evolved past the stage where waving a sprig of holly over a mans head can be expected to be as
effective as some attention from a professional oncologist.

The entire ethos of the site which is carrying this research to our attention, could be said therefore to be somewhat shakey, in terms of the
trustworthyness of any information it provides. Holistic therapy is all very well, but serious illness requires serious application of medical
understanding. By all means take alternative remedies for a cold, but where the Big C is concerned, get professional help.

There are piles of evidence maintaining that fluoride is detrimental to the health of any living being. Yet most people still don't say anything
about it being added to our water. I used to be skeptical of conspiracy theories, but now I'm really starting to wonder if this is population
control.

True brit, your posting is in ignorance. Medical doctors know only so much as the pharmaceutical industry teaches them. True naturopathic doctors
however, with a $300k education, know far more about how vitamins and enzymes are utilized by the body, as well as the bodies natural healing process
than most western doctors do.

Originally posted by pexx421
True brit, your posting is in ignorance. Medical doctors know only so much as the pharmaceutical industry teaches them.

Starred & quoted for truth

Doctors are only taught so much because the pharmaceutical industry is exactly that... an industry. If doctors were taught how to make people feel
100% healthy, then it wouldn't be much of a business, would it?

This is not about debating medical science Vs. Going all natural...It surely is not about naturalnews...I could of linked to a handful of different
sites that were running the article.

The information that I went and personally found on Dr. Burke,their studies and general information on fluoride dangers and possible links to causing
certain cancers is what this should be about.

There is plenty to read,learn and speculate about from the links that I have given throughout this thread.
I respect your opinion...I suppose we will have to agree to disagree on the matter.

I do not have the credentials to prove or disprove their findings but what I do know is from what I have been researching since coming across this and
in my humble opinion, deserves further inquiry & study before we simply throw it away and ignore it.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.