Politics, Prophecy & the Supernatural

Menu

Watchers

The new theory on the Serpent Mound…. The Dirt that Dances.
L. A. Marzulli returns to the Serpent Mound. He interviews a man who has lived near the mound all his life and gives us “inside” information. He then explains what will soon become controversial theory regarding how the mound may have been constructed. Hang on to your hats folks!

Watchers 10

THE WORLDWIDE NEPHILIM COVERUP

For years, there has been an on-going effort to get samples to perform DNA testing on the Peruvian skulls and other organic creatures. Bureaucratic red tape, the TSA, and other roadblocks have prevented it. But now, after decades of being hidden in a box in Oregon, a huge Peruvian skull is found — one that has been in the U.S. for so long it became available for DNA testing. Along with this, the red hairs from the baby mummy (WATCHERS 8) and three other skulls were tested. The origins of the elongated-skull people are finally known scientifically.

Two military men step up to tell their stories of giants in Afghanistan. Apparently this is a well-known phenomenon by the locals who tell stories of cannibalism and frightening encounters. When some troops didn’t report in at their designated rally point, contract operators were sent in to find them. The carnage they found was something no one expected. Special guest George Noory (Coast to Coast AM) describes a show in 2008 with Steve Quayle where an Air Force pilot said he flew a giant out of Kandahar. This is the rest of the story that hasn’t been told.

Jaime Maussan shows L.A. Marzulli a winged creature that he has kept confidential for years. Is it real or a masterful fake? Then, L.A. takes us to the Island of Catalina where giants were found near the turn of the 20th Century. Why does no one know?

This is our official disclosure of what we now know is a hoax. Thus, we call it The Anatomy of a Hoax.

It was complied by a master taxidermist and we’re still not sure why anyone would go to this length to create it, except perhaps to discredit Jaime Mausson.

I want to set the record straight because there have been some disinformation and “hit-pieces” regarding this.

First off, you will see and hear my skepticism all throughout this film. The bottom line was I didn’t know whether this Creature was real or a hoax. I leaned toward real, after speaking with the Vet, and it’s in print in my book, Nephilim Hybrids, that more testing needed to be done. This film is the result of the “more testing.”

The second point I wish to make is this. Once Watchers found out the Creature was a hoax I called Gary Stearman at Prophecy Watchers, as well as Derrick Gilbert from Sky Watch and told them to hold off on airing the programs we had filmed a few weeks earlier because we had new information.

This film features our journey and exploration into testing the Creature. You’ll see just how it came down. How up to the last-minute the Creature fooled the two Vets that were examining it.

Whoever created this hoax was a master. The question lingers, why did he or she do this? Was it to deliberately discredit Jaime Mausson? Did the creator of this Creature draw from something he or she had seen in real life? Perhaps we’ll never know all the answers but Watchers did the investigation and brought the results of it to you and here it is!

____________________________________________________________________

Watchers 10 and Nephilim Hybrids – SHIPPING NOW!

DNA EVIDENCE REVEALED!

Every civilization has stories of gods coming from the sky and producing offspring with human women. Most people tend to dismiss the stories as nothing more than a fanciful tale from a long-gone era.

Others recognize the truth often hidden within the stories, but believe that they tell of a time that is buried in the ancient past and that we no longer have to even contemplate such an occurrence in our time.

Only $19.99 + s&h

GO TO:

Unfortunately for both groups, the Bible is filled with details. Details that not only recount the time long ago when these heavenly beings cohabited with human women and produced a race of giants, but details that indicate a return of those heavenly beings and a renewal of the events now viewed as ancient history.

Perhaps most frightening of all, recent discoveries reveal that it’s no longer prophetic, but the renewal of that breeding program has already begun!

DNA RESULTS From the Paracas Skulls and the Oregon Skull that we tested in a private collection! See the full report in the appendix of Nephliim Hybrids!

A Winged Creature—HOAX!—that fooled us all!

The Catalina Island Cover up of the picture of a 9 foot skeleton that I exposed!

The GIANT Lovelock CAVE handprint, that someone “erased”!

The Mysterious “Ghost Wolf” Or what I would now call a demonic manifestation caught on a game trail camera!

Startling revelations of the Serpent Mound in Ohio which tie back to The Seed of the Serpent!

Steve Quayle was right! The AFGHAN Giant was/is real. First hand account from one of the shooters who came face to face with the giant.

Wearing my tin hat proudly!

Topics included in this exclusive talk: his interest in giants, giants in the bible, his hypothesis, David killed a giant Goliath, “As it was in the days in Noah”, trolls and skeptics, fire chastisement coming to wipe out Nephilim?, the Afghan Giant story, characteristics of Nephilim, where are they to be found?, various cultures speak of these giants its not just the bible, mainstream/entertainment industry prepping us?, the gov’t and military industrial complex’s role in all this?, Bigfoot and Nephilim, underground bunkers, CERN, prophecy, 3 days of darkness, those Jews who reject Our Lord and are preparing way of Antichrist say the giants will return (fact or fable?), Maitreya, UFO, Nephilim connection? and MUCH more!

Baruch 3:26 There were the giants, those renowned men that were from the beginning, of great stature, expert in war.

Share this:

Like this:

This is the Wifey’s drawing. Notice the line of red lights which were above the water at the place where the ocean meets the horizon.

“UFO’s are as real as the airplanes flying overhead.” Paul Hellyer. Former Canadian Defense Minister.

UFO’s are real, burgeoning and not going away. L. A. Marzulli

The Wifey and I were driving back from San Luis Obispo on Monday night, August 15th. It was around 9pm at night and we had just passed Neptune’s Net which is on PCH, right near County Line. It’s a favorite surf-spot and motorcycle-riders hang out. The view is amazing and it’s the last point of civilization, on PCH, as further up the coast is nothing but untouched mountainous terrain with no houses or other buildings for miles.

The Wifey was looking out at the ocean when she said: I see something that doesn’t look normal. She then described two sets of red lights which moved together and then suddenly disappeared. This area of ocean is one of the deepest channels in the ocean, on the planet, and is also a known USO/UFO hot spot.

Then L & J from Oceanside, which is about a three-hour drive south of us sent us this!

Hi LA

Last night August 15, 2016, approximately between 8:30 and 9 PM my wife and I went for a walk with the dogs and we were on a hill near our house when we saw multiple bright lights that look like orange fireballs. These lights appeared and disappeared at a rapid rate. The location where we saw the lights was over double peak in San Marco’s California. They appeared over eight lights total approximate maybe 10. We watch these lights appear and disappear for a good 5 to 10 minutes, until it completely stopped. The next day we saw on Fox five news that it talked about the lights over San Diego and how vast of an area they were appearing. L.

Last night August 15, 2016 around 8:30pm and 9:00pm my husband and I were walking our dogs on a hill behind our home when suddenly I noticed some bright orange lights that were appearing out of nowhere, some appeared to be dropping vertically and enlarging and diminishing without a trace. As soon as I notice the lights I started counting them, I counted 8 to 10 at first. Then we wanted to capture it on video but unfortunately neither of us had our phones with us so my husband ran back inside the house to get his phone and during that time I counted another 8 lights and the following morning we saw the news report on Fox5news San Diego about the light over Southern California. J.

This article is yet another tired and pompous lecture from Heiser’s armchair critic views—never having been involved doing the actual research himself. Never having trudged through the graveyards of Peru. Never having walked through the sticky mud in Gilgal, or wrote checks for tens of thousands of dollars for lab tests at multiple genetics labs. Easy to criticize when facts are simply ignored and ignorance is so prevalent and disclosed with such breathtaking arrogance, and yet this has become Heiser’s trademark. I’m disgusted by it, and so are a lot of others.

It makes you wonder what is truly going on here then just critical comments coming from the smartest guy in the room — offering no proof other than books written by others. Some of that so-called “proof” is now decades old and has been shown to be only partially accurate. And, “sloppy research?” Really. Every step was documented as described by forensic expert Chase Kloetzke whose level of detail was exacting. The gloves, bags and tools for examination; approved by the labs. The methods discussed and agreed upon. Where is Heiser’s comment about the Foramen Magnum? But he will never mention anything that might create doubt with his own public views. But the display of ignorance in this latest article goes beyond anything I’ve read before from Heiser. What is the motive here? To us who have lived in this research and gotten hip deep in it, his comments are tantamount of his own lack of study, research, or understanding of the facts. Are the others involved in Marzulli’s work also to be slandered and minimized? The lab technicians? The many archeologists involved? — just because Heiser’s personal opinions happen to differ from their own research?

The idea that names weren’t mentioned of what labs were used were at the request of those very labs. We were allowed to film in two of them, but only reveal the name from one lab. “Amateurish?” People have been fired from their jobs when doing such research, and one geneticist actually was during the process for doing work on his own after becoming startled at what he was discovering. Heiser also doesn’t mention the lab results of Carbon 14, startling in its own right. He’d rather throw insults than truly examine the data — but that takes too much time. He’d rather pull out an old or familiar book and expound from that instead of trying to understand the serious nature of what is now being discovered. He fits right in with the globalist point of view that are actively trying to conceal the truth — evidence that can no longer be hidden.

The scientific community is as much a “cult” as some religious orgs, steeped in their views that will not be shaken by any new evidence that goes against their doctrine. The lab that allowed filming and interviews was a Canadian lab, Lakehead University in Thunder Bay. Test results were verified on camera in WATCHERS 10. I was there. There was no trickery, no sloppy work or unethical reporting. To say it’s “sloppy” insults all those people working on our samples that were sent to them, and is insulting to me, the Director of WATCHERS 10. Like it or not we present the results. It’s up to you if you want to open your mind to the truth or keep listening to the rantings of a disgruntled pundit. I’m personally tired of it, after having labored for the past 6 years with L.A. Marzulli and know the guy personally. “Christian Ethics?” I thought Christian ethics were all about telling the truth.

first of all, L.A. hasn’t been responding to your comments Mike, I have. He really doesn’t have time for this, and I don’t either.

All of the “proof” you’re asking about is openly presented. And bouncing our research off an atheist friend or cohort doesn’t really prove anything, does it? There is a well-known bias to Biblical historical evidence, and that’s to be expected. This is why WATCHERS isn’t solely made for a religious audience. If you’re going to bounce our research off of someone, since LA is referring to historical evidence in the Torah, why not contact Tom Horn or Gary Stearman, both of which are Biblical scholars and are trustworthy. I have my rabbi friends that have also been very helpful. Or, you could contact LakeHead University and ask them if we concealed evidence from them or if our reporting was flawed of what they did. The other two labs we are not at liberty to reveal.

We show everything we’re allowed to. And we do that with respect and appreciation to the people at the labs, the labs themselves, and those that want to steer clear of controversy.

The reason that it’s apparent that I said you haven’t done your homework is because you’re asking extremely sophomoric questions that no one that has seen the film would be asking. So, it appears you’ve written a rebuttal on research you haven’t seen or read from LA’s book. So I have to ask the obvious question, why is that? Why try to introduce doubt in something you can’t quantify only because you haven’t seen it? Until I know and have some reason to believe you have, I’m not interested in responding to any more of this nonsense.

The controversy does help our sales, so if you feel you must continue to blast us, be my guest.
Richard Shaw
Director
Pinlight LLC