(Haas now 34, is playing the best tennis of his life)The same can also be said of Gasquet)1hbh is not dead, but is dying quickly. Just take a look at youngsters. Only prosperous one I can think of this moment is Dimitrov)

Just hear yourself's,who beat these guys & thay are playing the best tennis of their life's.In case you forgot it was Murray & Ferrer

(Haas now 34, is playing the best tennis of his life)The same can also be said of Gasquet)1hbh is not dead, but is dying quickly. Just take a look at youngsters. Only prosperous one I can think of this moment is Dimitrov)

Just hear yourself's,who beat these guys & thay are playing the best tennis of their life's.In case you forgot it was Murray & Ferrer

hey sid, long time no see Great win vs ManU today

Btw, it's not the point who beat whom, but whether 1hbh is still efficient or is it dead.

Not to mention how close was Haas to actually beat Ferrer on the slowest hc, you would know it if you watched it.Ferrer being a 'modern tennis player' and Haas a representative of old school all around game.Its safe to say that Tommy would have beaten Ferrer if the conditions were 'normal' so to say.

Babs, sorry but didn't Fed say a few years ago that the only thing that matters is #1. Ah, let me think who is there ? Yeah, I feel like a biotch today. Is that OK?

I'll take it one step further. The only ranking that matters is YE #1 when discussing the big 4. That being said, and Federer's move from #3 to #1 aside when you move from #145 to #14 in a year, that's worth taking notice of.

For now, I live outside the big 4, so #1 and YE #1 don't mean much to me these days.

(Haas now 34, is playing the best tennis of his life)The same can also be said of Gasquet)1hbh is not dead, but is dying quickly. Just take a look at youngsters. Only prosperous one I can think of this moment is Dimitrov)

Just hear yourself's,who beat these guys & thay are playing the best tennis of their life's.In case you forgot it was Murray & Ferrer

hey sid, long time no see Great win vs ManU today

Btw, it's not the point who beat whom, but whether 1hbh is still efficient or is it dead.

Not to mention how close was Haas to actually beat Ferrer on the slowest hc, you would know it if you watched it.Ferrer being a 'modern tennis player' and Haas a representative of old school all around game.Its safe to say that Tommy would have beaten Ferrer if the conditions were 'normal' so to say.

I never saw todays footie match as i was in a fishing match,i came 2nd out of 35 other guys.Murray won Miami not playing his better tennis,Murray's serve was not anywhere near his best @ Miami,courts were slower this year as you say.LOL it could near have been clay speed Haas played very well @ Miami,but to win you can not serve & volley & end up the winner.Murray is better on a quicker court.Ferrer played alot of tennis this year & he's aving a good year so far.Ferrer for a small guy is doing Amazing & he past 30 years.

Haas lost because he had a Tommy Haas episode in the middle of the match. It had nothing to do with his game, and for you ding-dongs that insist he lost because you can't S&V and win, you only prove one thing: you didn't watch the match!

The 1-hander definitely isn't dead. Gasquet's is beautiful. As is Waw's. Almagro's can be occasionally if he's feeling it. But to whoever said Ferrer is a 'modern tennis player', that's BS. There's a reason he still hasn't broken through. And there's a reason why it took Murray so long to finally break through (and I should mention, he broke through when Nadal was absent and Fed is falling off). They don't have finishing power. Nadal and Djoker are grinders to some extent, but they both know how to flatten it out and thump a winner when they set it up. Ferrer just hopes the opponent hits an error. That's why he gets murderer when he plays Nadal or Djoker. They aren't going to make that error, and they know how to thump one by Ferrer.

(Haas now 34, is playing the best tennis of his life)The same can also be said of Gasquet)1hbh is not dead, but is dying quickly. Just take a look at youngsters. Only prosperous one I can think of this moment is Dimitrov)

Just hear yourself's,who beat these guys & thay are playing the best tennis of their life's.In case you forgot it was Murray & Ferrer

hey sid, long time no see Great win vs ManU today

Btw, it's not the point who beat whom, but whether 1hbh is still efficient or is it dead.

Not to mention how close was Haas to actually beat Ferrer on the slowest hc, you would know it if you watched it.Ferrer being a 'modern tennis player' and Haas a representative of old school all around game.Its safe to say that Tommy would have beaten Ferrer if the conditions were 'normal' so to say.

I never saw todays footie match as i was in a fishing match,i came 2nd out of 35 other guys.Murray won Miami not playing his better tennis,Murray's serve was not anywhere near his best @ Miami,courts were slower this year as you say.LOL it could near have been clay speed Haas played very well @ Miami,but to win you can not serve & volley & end up the winner.Murray is better on a quicker court.Ferrer played alot of tennis this year & he's aving a good year so far.Ferrer for a small guy is doing Amazing & he past 30 years.

There's so much wrong with that sentence, but nvm its obvious you didn't watch the match, so there's no point.