Comments on: Missouri: Act Now to Help Nullify Federal Gun Controlhttp://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/04/missouri-act-now-to-help-nullify-federal-gun-control/
The Tenther GrapevineTue, 16 Sep 2014 02:47:58 +0000hourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=4.6.1By: Cheryl Drumhttp://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/04/missouri-act-now-to-help-nullify-federal-gun-control/#comment-61289
Thu, 10 Jul 2014 09:38:08 +0000http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=15607#comment-61289From Ohio Mike?
]]>By: Katie Fentonhttp://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/04/missouri-act-now-to-help-nullify-federal-gun-control/#comment-31943
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 23:00:43 +0000http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=15607#comment-31943There is no reason to be rude because other people sin different than you do.
]]>By: Kenneth Hicksonhttp://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/04/missouri-act-now-to-help-nullify-federal-gun-control/#comment-31942
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:54:23 +0000http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=15607#comment-31942Now we have to ban those pressure cookers. !!
]]>By: Mark Rein Gashhttp://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/04/missouri-act-now-to-help-nullify-federal-gun-control/#comment-31941
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:26:18 +0000http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=15607#comment-31941anything stinking republicans in missouri ever done was foul as putrid ,poluted water.
]]>By: Mark Rein Gashhttp://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/04/missouri-act-now-to-help-nullify-federal-gun-control/#comment-31940
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:25:13 +0000http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=15607#comment-31940how do i keep trash like this off my page ?
]]>By: Tyler Chuninghttp://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/04/missouri-act-now-to-help-nullify-federal-gun-control/#comment-31939
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:21:40 +0000http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=15607#comment-31939Missouri Representative for the 20th District Mr. John Mayfield has just confirmed to me that he will be voting YES on HB436!!
]]>By: Lisa Bracyhttp://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/04/missouri-act-now-to-help-nullify-federal-gun-control/#comment-31379
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 13:14:11 +0000http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=15607#comment-31379Now you’re going to have to ban the sale and possession of pressure cookers!
]]>By: Lacey Leigh Donaldsonhttp://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/04/missouri-act-now-to-help-nullify-federal-gun-control/#comment-31378
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:46:58 +0000http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=15607#comment-31378I will not comply with unlawful laws.
]]>By: Michael Robinsonhttp://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/04/missouri-act-now-to-help-nullify-federal-gun-control/#comment-31377
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:16:07 +0000http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=15607#comment-31377lol wow
]]>By: Mike Urbanhttp://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/04/missouri-act-now-to-help-nullify-federal-gun-control/#comment-31376
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 05:15:06 +0000http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=15607#comment-31376Here is what I’m mailing my reps/senators. Feel free to copy:
Dear _____________:
I am writing in regards to HB436, and Senator Nieves companion bill SB325. I strongly encourage you to support both efforts. Prior to the 17th amendment to the US Constitution it was the job of our US Senators to represent the states interests in Washington DC. After the 17th amendment however US Senators are elected the same as House Members, which has reduced and almost eliminated the states voice on the national level. I cannot recall a US Senator asking: “Is this Constitutional?” before casting his or her vote on a particular issue. Per the 2nd, 9th, and 10th, amendments to the US Constitution, as well as the fact that the states created the federal government in the first place, it now is imperative that we assert our voice and our rights if we intend on keeping them.
To quote historian Dr. Thomas E. Woods, Jr:
What the Supremacy Clause actually says is: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof…shall be the supreme law of the land.”
The standard law-school response deletes the most significant words of the whole clause. Thomas Jefferson was not unaware of, and did not deny, the Supremacy Clause. His point was that only the Constitution and laws which shall be made in pursuance thereof shall be the supreme law of the land. Citing the Supremacy Clause merely begs the question. A nullifying state maintains that a given law is not “in pursuance thereof” and therefore that the Supremacy Clause does not apply in the first place.
Such critics are expecting us to believe that the states would have ratified a Constitution with a Supremacy Clause that said, in effect, “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof, plus any old laws we may choose to pass, whether constitutional or not, shall be the supreme law of the land.”
For Liberty,
_________________
]]>