If the GOP is actually just part of the Uniparty thanks to the establishment liberals, then one would be voting second party in order to break the one-party lock on the nation. Not merely in a pedantic sense either.

Socialists generally have an internationalist bent and believe in no national borders. Not to mention that socialists of all stripes work together, whether atheistic, “humanist” or Islamic.

I would say that there is a dichotomy between fighting for the integrity of Israel’s borders and fighting to break them down. Which do the socialist veterans believe in? and did they do the defense of borders thing merely on orders, in order to avoid any kind of dishonorable discharge and thus availing of care from the state? (Rotten question to ask, I know, but one never knows another’s heart.)

Still buying the propaganda that there was free “bailout money” and that Germany is being bled dry, eh? The “bailouts” were loans and the terms insisted that the countries that took the loans surrender more of their sovereignty to the EU. (Ireland claims that their loans were paid off too.) Never mind Germany’s own beggar-thy-neighbor policy that turned them rather suddenly from the “sick man of Europe” into its leading economy (and de facto political ruler).

Funny how they use “the Pale” euphemism. That’s derived from when Dublin and a surrounding 1,200-square-mile area in Ireland was ruled by the English (the name came from Latin “palus” or fence-post) and the rest ruled by the Irish warlords. So the White House hates the Brits but wants to use its terms; double standard.

The EU equates it with tax evasion. They think they own the whole continent, after all. They hate what they call “tax havens”. When Jose Manuel Barroso called the EU an “empire”, he was in earnest, although duplicitous in his overall description.

That was two years ago. He may have said something, but it’s not important enough to worry about, evidently. If Cruz had to fight the liberal media over every innuendo and slander, he would have time for nothing else.

I briefly had a beef with Cruz over his inaccurate and (IMHO) inappropriate Nelson Mandela eulogy, but got over that.

Assertions by the NY Slimes are “facts”? Note that the claim that Cruz “noted” he was not for so-called “self-deportation” is not rendered as a quote, and there is no source for it. Never mind the über-liberal Texas Tribune, which echoed the NY Slimes’ non-quote.