If Soros is so powerful how come there are no Democrats left in government?

For starters, he didn't just fund Democrats. He's the financial backing behind John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnel, and several
other RINOs. The last election proved that the country is largely leaning rightward between the West and East Coast metropolises. He's diversifying.

What are conservatives doing about it through this new campaign here??? How and who are they???

It's all very vague.

Where the hell have you been?
There is a open effort (full court press / blitz) by media matters and other Soros backed organizations to attack advertisers. They were successful
with Bill O’Reilly and are now coming for Sean Hannity via his advertisers.

Here is their list for Sean Hannity and their gloating of success, they got 7 but USAA came back:

[1] GoodRx -- After the publication of this list, GoodRx reached out to advise that their recent television buy is over and that they do not have any
future television buys planned. They want to be very clear that because the buy is over, they did not technically remove any ads. They also wanted to
make it clear that if they do run ads in the future, they may or may not advertise on Hannity's program. (Observation: GoodRx seems especially
concerned about the unfortunate controversy they have been dragged into. Their situation is an illustration of the pitfalls of not being intentional
with ad buys and getting swept up in associations with volatile personalities like Hannity.)

[3] Viking River Cruises -- In a statement provided to Media Matters on May 30, a spokesperson for Viking River Cruises confirmed that the company
will "no longer be advertising" on Sean Hannity's program.

Angelo Carusone's organization posted a list of Hannity's advertisers. A similar campaign led to dozens of advertisers abandoning Bill O'Reilly, who
was eventually let go. So far, seven companies have pulled their ads from the show. Carusone predicts Hannity's demise will come, but not as
quickly.

Sean Hannity, one of the few commercial media hosts to discuss the case has been hit with over a dozen Media Matters attack pieces within the past
24 hours. Despite that, Sean Hannity continues to investigate Rich’s murder – a murder that would be under significantly more scrutiny if Rich
was not involved with the immensely corrupt DNC. Targeting conservative media commentators and outlets is nothing new, but the force that Media
Matters is coming after Hannity is cause for investigation. If these were truly baseless allegations, as they claim, then why would they invest so
much effort and money into shutting down the investigation?

Last week, Media Matters launched a campaign ― “Know What You’re Sponsoring” ― that’s aimed at making sure “ad buyers know what their
clients are sponsoring if they spend their ad dollars with Fox,” according to the group’s release. Carusone said posting the list of Hannity’s
advertisers is “a continuation of that conversation,” and pointed out that Media Matters compiled it through publicly available information.

Last month, then-Fox News star and accused sexual harasser Bill O’Reilly saw more than 50 companies quickly flee his show following an advertiser
boycott led by Media Matters and other progressive organizations. Hannity tweeted more than a dozen times Wednesday that “liberal fascists” at
Media Matters now were targeting him just as Cars.com became the first advertiser to jump ship.

The recent attention being paid to his advertisers, Hannity said in an interview with HuffPost, is an attempt by progressives to silence his
conservative voice.

Hey, it's a big world out there. I can't know everything that's going on all the time ya know. Only so many hours in a day.

Ok, so he's lost like 10 advertisers according to that list. Out of I don't even know how many, but a lot more than 10.

How do you know MediaMatters is responsible for all those anyway??? Maybe they left for their own reasons.

Also, what if what MediaMatters is saying about Hannity is true and therefore only stating perfectly good reasons why people shouldn't be advertising
with them??? Nobody has to advertise on a program if it's not good business for them to do so.

I don't really see the problem here. How is MediaMatters doing anything wrong here???? Are you saying they're lying to the advertisers or making the
advertisers stop using his show or something????

Hey, it's a big world out there. I can't know everything that's going on all the time ya know. Only so many hours in a day.

Ok, so he's lost like 10 advertisers according to that list. Out of I don't even know how many, but a lot more than 10.

How do you know MediaMatters is responsible for all those anyway??? Maybe they left for their own reasons.

Also, what if what MediaMatters is saying about Hannity is true and therefore only stating perfectly good reasons why people shouldn't be advertising
with them??? Nobody has to advertise on a program if it's not good business for them to do so.

I don't really see the problem here. How is MediaMatters doing anything wrong here???? Are you saying they're lying to the advertisers or making the
advertisers stop using his show or something????

This Maybe?

The left-wing nonprofit published a list of Hannity’s advertisers on Wednesday, kickstarting a public campaign to pressure the advertisers into
dropping his show.

Soon after the list went public, reporters began contacting advertisers to ask whether they would continue supporting Hannity after he pushed a
conspiracy theory surrounding murdered Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich.

On Twitter, advertisers were flooded with angry threats of boycotts if they didn’t pull their ads from “Hannity.”

Thanks for this. Now I do recall that USAA went back to sponsoring Hannity after so many vets threatened to pull their accounts. So who likely has
the income to make this happen? Not the college SJW who are putting up the most fuss.

Okay this could work. May even get a twitter account so I can join in the chatter.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.