Aftermath of the attack. The damage is secondary, it is the precedent that matters.Aftermath of the US attack on the al Sharat airbase in Homs.Aftermath of the US attack on the al Sharat airbase in Homs.Southfront map shows the location of the base near to the east Homs battlefield where the Syrian Army are battling ISIS. After promising to crush ISIS Trump is now offering them air support.

April 8, 2017.

US Attacks Syria with Cruise Missile Barrage on the Back of Big Lie.

At around 3.40am Damascus time on April the 7th, the US Navy launched a barrage of 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles upon the Shayrat Syrian Air Force base in Homs province leaving at least six members of the Syrian military dead along with 9 civilians including four children.

Reports of damage vary widely but an aircraft repair depot containing damaged 8 planes and the radar station appear to have been the greatest losses of material.

The attack appears to have been extraordinarily militarily ineffective,but that is secondary to the fact that a threshold has been crossed, a precedent has been set and once these operations begin they almost inevitably achieve a momentum of their own.

In response Russia has suspended the agreement with the US coalition designed to avoid accidental collision or clashes between the Syrian/Russian and US coalition aircraft.

Alex Jones: “Doesn’t he understand , he is a smart guy, that when he rolls over to these people it only encourages them. They want his head on a spike.”

Paul Craig Roberts:”Well they don’t need his head on a spike if he surrenders to them.”

“I can’t say what he is doing but to me it looks like surrender.” (Source)

Robert Parry at Consortium News provides a credible, albeit anonymously sourced account of the internal machinations:

“the Trump national security team split between the President’s close personal advisers, such as nationalist firebrand Steve Bannon and son-in-law Jared Kushner, on one side and old-line neocons who have regrouped under National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, an Army general who was a protégé of neocon favorite Gen. David Petraeus.”

White House Infighting

“In this telling, the earlier ouster of retired Gen. Michael Flynn as national security adviser and this week’s removal of Bannon from the National Security Council were key steps in the reassertion of neocon influence inside the Trump presidency. The strange personalities and ideological extremism of Flynn and Bannon made their ousters easier, but they were obstacles that the neocons wanted removed.”

“Though Bannon and Kushner are often presented as rivals, the source said, they shared the belief that Trump should tell the truth about Syria, revealing the Obama administration’s CIA analysis that a fatal sarin gas attack in 2013 was a “false-flag” operation intended to sucker President Obama into fully joining the Syrian war on the side of the rebels — and the intelligence analysts’ similar beliefs about Tuesday’s incident.”

Instead, Trump went along with the idea of embracing the initial rush to judgment blaming Assad for the Idlib poison-gas event. The source added that Trump saw Thursday night’s missile assault as a way to change the conversation in Washington, where his administration has been under fierce attack from Democrats claiming that his election resulted from a Russian covert operation.”

Later Parry writes

“logic and respect for facts no longer prevail inside Official Washington, nor inside the mainstream U.S. news media.”

In the space of 24 hours Trump has completely repudiated everything he ever said about Syria and foreign policy in general. The intelligence reports must be pretty damning, they must have concocted a case? Apparently not according to Philip Giraldi, extremely credible former CIA officer who stated:

“The intelligence confirms pretty much the account that the Russians have been giving … which is that they hit a warehouse where the rebels – now these are rebels that are, of course, connected with Al Qaeda – where the rebels were storing chemicals of their own and it basically caused an explosion that resulted in the casualties. Apparently the intelligence on this is very clear.”

In order to see just how these actions represent a complete repudiation of everything Trump claimed to represent, we need simply to measure the actions against the President’s own words upon inauguration.

“Today’s ceremony, however, has very special meaning. Because today we are not merely transferring power from one Administration to another, or from one party to another – but we are transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the American People.

For too long, a small group in our nation’s Capital has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the cost.

Washington flourished – but the people did not share in its wealth.

Politicians prospered – but the jobs left, and the factories closed.

The establishment protected itself, but not the citizens of our country.

Their victories have not been your victories; their triumphs have not been your triumphs; and while they celebrated in our nation’s Capital, there was little to celebrate for struggling families all across our land.

That all changes – starting right here, and right now, because this moment is your moment: it belongs to you.

What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people.

January 20th 2017, will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again.”

The forgotten men and women of our country will be forgotten no longer.

Everyone is listening to you now.

You came by the tens of millions to become part of a historic movement the likes of which the world has never seen before.

At the center of this movement is a crucial conviction: that a nation exists to serve its citizens.

Americans want great schools for their children, safe neighborhoods for their families, and good jobs for themselves.

These are the just and reasonable demands of a righteous public.”

This is a very powerful statement and the way I interpret it is he is saying that when he makes a decision the impact of said decision on the average American will be at the core of the process. It is the promise to govern in the interests of the people,”a nation exists to serve its citizens.”

This is a great litmus test by which to evaluate Trump as President.

Later in the speech the same themes are expressed even more forcefully and the folly of the US foreign policy over recent decades is also discussed.

“For many decades, we’ve enriched foreign industry at the expense of American industry;

Subsidized the armies of other countries while allowing for the very sad depletion of our military;

Dud Tomahawk Cruise Missile at the Shayrat airbase in Homs after the US attack.The hole made by a cruise missile impact upon the arched hangar where the Syrian Air-force stored the planes they were repairing.Syrian soldiers outside the Shayrat airbase the day after the US attack.Graphic shows the purported targets attacked by the US. (Source)

An Open and Shut Breach of International Law.

The attack was not in conformity with international law and can therefore be deemed a war crime in and of itself, an act of criminal aggression taken on an evidence free pretext and without the required UN mandate. It is beyond unlikely that anyone will ever be prosecuted for making this illegal order but that is due to the impotence of the administration of international law, the illegality is uncontroversial.

“All members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state” (Source)

Even if they eventually hold an investigation and it supports the assertions the US President has made about the origin of the Khan Shaykhun attack, the response was still illegal because there was no UN mandate and no imminent threat- the only situation that provides a legal exception.

” a general prohibition (on the use of force against another nation), subject only to the exceptions stated in the Charter (self-defence and Chapter VII action by the Security Council).

In his crude way, Trump has shown Obama the “correct” way to capitalise on a big lie.

Act before there is time for the real evidence to emerge. Act like a moron and pretend everyone knows what has happened without evidence, or recourse to basic commonsense.

Create facts on the ground with your response, that is, start the war and after that you’re off and away, the situation will now escalate naturally due to the action that you have taken enabling you to ride the big lie all the way to your desired outcome.

The desired outcome here would appear to be the complete destruction of the Syrian government and the dismemberment of the nation, with Israel gifted the Golan,al Qaeda, the Kurds and the Alawi/Shia./Druze/Christians all hosting mini-states in the place of Syria and never-ending bloodshed in its place.

Russian MoD drone footage of aftermath from US missile strike on Syrian Army airbase

RAW: US fires Tomahawk missiles at Syrian military base from USS Ross and USS Porter ships

One of the more obvious faux wounded from Brussels. One persistently silly part of this event is that the people who have supposedly been in close proximity to an explosion are sporting pristine clean clothes.Drill casualties- :spot the difference. (Source)Cringeworthy shot of faux bomb victim in Brussels. Logically fake victims can mean only one thing-no real attack has happened.Drill casualties have better wounds!.(Source)This classic shot sums up the farcical nature of what we are currently expected to believe. Fake wounded victim writhes randomly and laughably as people walk past ignoring the ridiculous spectacle. This is definitely not the aftermath of an attack.

March 25th, 2016.

“We need to try to understand the extraordinary evolution this phenomenon has gone through that…when it first started it was, the deaths were real but the story was bogus and in around about 2012 we had this amazing transformation whereby actors could apparently do it without needing real, you know- you’ve got ketchup all over the place instead of real blood and that was a real change I think.”

Since the year 2012 almost all of the supposed terror attacks in Western nations are confirmed and proven hoax events. This is the new model. The early indications are that the Brussels attacks were of the same genre. Fiction. Joining the entire wave of Euroterror that has taken place over the past 14 months at Charlie Hebdo and the Kosher Delicatessen, in Copenhagen, in Paris on Black Friday and in the genuinely hilarious French train psyop.

Gladio was the cold war synthetic terror/ strategy of tension, Gladio B as coined by Sibel Edmonds was similar to the original but with Muslims replacing communists as the enemy.

Gladio C is very similar to Gladio B but instead of false flag terror attacks such as 911, Bali and London 7/7 the events are entirely staged. These are drills that are enacted, filmed and sold to the public as authentic terror attacks.

Whether or not it is tactically intelligent to make the hoax argument when people are likely to be more receptive to a false flag narrative is a completely separate issue. The false flag attack narrative is no longer the truth when it comes to modern psyops and those who cling to the false flag narrative and pretend that these events are real, are not telling the truth.

It can be rather tricky positively proving that these events were feigned, faux and fraudulent and from a tactical point of view it may well be unwise to attempt to convince everyday people of this as the truth is so far beyond the reality they occupy that this hypothesis may only alienate them and cause them to see you as insane.

Nonetheless, the truth does matter, it is important even when to all intents and purposes the event might as well have taken place. The response to these things is such that it might as well have happened. Those who have swallowed the “terror” narrative and felt the real emotions that this narrative caused them to feel, will never believe the whole thing was a fraud, but none of this changes the fact that this is the case.

It is astonishing the way so many intelligent people will respond like automatons whenever something like this happens. The whole political/media gang play their roles mindlessly like wind up robots with their pathetic attempts to blame their political opponents for the faux tragedy.

Everything that people are saying about this event,that is predicated upon the authenticity of the attack is nonsense.

One of the more amusing things about the Brussles attack was the attempt to create a motive where none eists.Thus when “ISIS” made their claim of responsibility via a social media account that could be run by absolutely anyone,the group tried to say that the attack was in revenge for Belgium’s participation in fighting the “brothers” in Iraq as part of the “International Coalition”.

There are two funny things there, one being that Belgium ceased its involvement in Iraq last July having stationed six F16 jets in Jordan for less than a year, the other being that even when they were purportedly coalition members they did absolutely nothing, like most of the members of the US led coalition who generally make one or two attacks for PR purposes and then disappear into oblivion.

The British and French campaigns are perfect cases in point, a big political noise followed by one or two “pageant” attacks and then nothing.

2009 photo of the section of Zavantem airport where the incident of March 22nd took place.

Brussels.

Given that the attack took place only days ago the evidence is still to be developed but it can be stated with confidence that the Brussels airport attack was not an authentic event based upon the footage that has been released.

There are several videos that purport to show the immediate aftermath of the Brussels attack. There are two major anomalies in these videos that immediately strike the critical viewer. There are no bodies inside the terminal that has supposedly just been attacked, nor any wounded. Some people, appear to be wounded as you watch the start of the video but as you watch they get up and walk away. Dazed at worst.

Mayhem in Brussels airport: Immediate aftermath of Zaventem bombings

The absence of wounded and dead people at the scene of the event is a core problem and when you add to that the many videos of the outside of the building at approximately the same time that also show no people with any significant wounds, it is pretty clear what has happened although the authors of the Brussels psyop deserve a lot of credit for the innovation of apparently bombing the empty building before moving in the cast to conduct the psyop.

This is a clunky hypothesis but does seem to be the best explanation for the fact that the building has been damaged but there are no victims of any veracity to be seen.

Fake Wounded People Mean the Event Cannot Possibly be an authentic attack.

A tremendous effort has been made with the Brussels operation and in the days since the event a massive amount of evidence of an “ISIS terror attack” in Brussels has been amassed by the establishment media in an attemtp to sear the Brussels narrative into the mind of the credulous audience. Some of it is superficially convincing such as the much used photo below, but even here critical scrutiny makes it clear that these are fake victims. We are told that the lady in the yellow top and black bra had her clothes blown off by the force of the blast yet she has not suffered any cuts, abrasions or other injuries to these areas. This is not credible and neither is the woman with the paint blood n her hands blithely talking on the phone beside her. Look at the woman on the phone’s face, does she look like someone who has recently been witness even to a traumatic incident? Or does she appear to be having another mundane run of the mill day?

Survivors of the airport attack in the aftermath.Has this woman been even in the same city as an actual terror attack? Of course not.Here is an empty stretcher, with a little blood smeared for verisimilitude. A tactic that was also used in Sydney.Here we have the same stretcher, the empty stretcher PIXELATED by the London Telegraph.to avoid the poor viewer being upset by the fact that they are looking at an empty stretcher with some blood spattered upon it. This hilarious, dirty little tactic was very prominent with the Charlie Hebdo hoax when people were told they could not look at the fake shooting of the policeman in the street because it was too graphic. It actually showed the entire event was a fraud 100%. A pixelated empty stretcher is a strong marker of a faux event.Empty stretcher with a portion of fake blood at the Sydney siege, December 2014.

Trouser bombs strike again.

A classic reprise of the trouser bomb first experienced in Boston in Brussels.Classic Boston trouser bomb number one. Props mismatch indicates the truth. The clothes are shredded by shrapnel that failed to break the skin. This is impossible. This is costume shredding.

Conclusion.

It is too early to state definitively that what happened in a Brussels was a completely fake event but it is obvious that it was and the evidence and the lack of evidence over succeeding months will make this claim a hard provable fact in my opinion, just as it is today hard proven that Boston and Sandy Hook were faux events like all of the other major incidents in Western nations in recent years with the apparent exception of the plane incidents such as German Wings 9525 and MH17where genuine mass death appears to have occurred. Outside the West the violence is very real with very occasional theatrics thrown in at the behest of the BBC or CNN.

The incident combines elements of two of this years previous faux events, at Garland and Chattanooga with a boosted “body count” for added emotional impact.

There was no shooting in San Bernadino , there were no 14 people killed and 21 wounded, what happened in San Bernadino was just another drill sold as a live event, and a particularly poorly constructed example of the genre.

One look at the scene outside the Inland Regional Center made it very clear that there was no shooting incident there merely an active shooting drill and that fact combined with the recent history of similar events makes the hoax hypothesis the only sustainable and logical conclusion.

If there had been a genuine shooting massacre there would be no need to stage a fake scene of the aftermath of a shooting with fake victims.

All of the footage of the aftermath is footage of an active shooter mass casualty drill. All of this drill footage has been presented as being the authentic aftermath of a massacre, none of the footage from the scene outside the Inland Regional Center shows anyone who is wounded.

When you have fake wounded people laying down on pre-positioned ground sheets in an area marked by witches hats, in the middle of a supposed emergency, well they almost seem not to be trying.

When you have a group of people obviously playing the role of the wounded in a landscape that in no way matches that of the aftermath of a genuine emergency, all the other details become somewhat secondary but it is worth noting that the Inland Community Centre holds monthly active shooter drills.

The very easy to spot artificial aftermath of the San Bernadino incident.Ground sheets, witches hats, no wounded people and the man in the blue vest appears to be evaluating the conduct of the drill.

The Official Story.

The shooting is claimed to have been carried out by a husband and wife team of Muslim Americans. The narrative is a bizarre and incoherent hybrid of the “going postal” and “Muslim terror attack” sub genres.

The absolutely ridiculous story is that the fellow they are blaming was involved in a minor dispute at his work Christmas party, went home to his wife (who they have back-filled as being a Facebook IS supporter!) Informed his wife that it was time to embark on a mass murder spree in the “name of Islam” so they dressed in combat gear, gathered up all the ammunition they had amassed along with a bunch of pipe bombs, dropped their six month old child off with relatives, drove to the Inland Regional Center and conducted the massacre before fleeing and being found and killed later by the local police.

According to the San Bernardino Police Chief Jarred Burguan the assailants were wearing masks, but the masks did not stop people from identifying them, so the police went to their address, encountered the vehicle they were traveling in close to their home, and killed them and during this encounter, despite being in possession of dozens of pipe bombs, the police state that the perpetrators threw a mock explosive from the vehicle before being killed.

The “Wounded” Woman in the purple top.

I was watching a video of one of the wounded people being placed on a stretcher and evacuated, I was frustrated as I could not see the wounded person and thought it highly suspicious that two people seemed to be standing in front of the wounded person and shielding them from the camera.

Where is the wounded person in this photo?

To my astonishment one of the people who seemed completely unhurt up to that point WAS the patient and the woman, showing no signs of distress at all, calmly climbs onto the gurney to fulfill her role having walked unaided to that point, no gunshot wounds, no wounds at all.

The woman who is standing there the picture of health is the wounded victim.Our star survivor yet again.These wounds are certainly horrific. The woman in the purple top is a real star player. here she seems to be feigning a sore knee.

The Second Crime Scene.

It is possible, albeit highly unlikely, that the second part of the story actually happened, that the police were told that these two were the perpetrators of a shooting and tracked and killed them on that basis.

The body visible on the scene does not seem to match the police description of the shooters.

It also appears, that the blood and other evidence of the second shooting were placed at the scene after the event.

The car before the blood.The car after blood and debris appear to have been placed at the scene.

The disposal of the patsies is always a very difficult part of these stories to unmask because the police completely control the scene and the information that is released so the really obvious signs of deception that are present in the main scene are generally harder to discern at the secondary scenes.

Whether the designated offenders were complicit in the deception or were simply framed and executed is of secondary importance in comparison with the fact that the core event they are accused of perpetrating clearly did not take place.

It is almost certain the entire incident is a work of fiction, but it is absolutely certain based on the obviously manufactured scene that the core event, the massacre at the Inland Regional centre is a work of fiction.

Lawyer David S. Chelsey during the CNN interview during which he claimed Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik were found handcuffed in the back of the black SUV.

Lawyer States Suspects were found handcuffed in the back of the SUV!

In a stunning turn that strongly implies that Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik were abducted and framed, an attorney representing the Farook family, David S. Chelsey stated during an interview with CNN’s Chris Cuomo that Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik were found HANDCUFFED and face down in the back of the black SUV.

The response to this from Cuomo only served to underline the true role of the media.

It would have been completely legitimate for Cuomo to question the veracity of the “found handcuffed” claim, but he did not do that, instead Cuomo proceeded to attempt to intimidate the two lawyers representing the family into affirming the guilt of their clients and to reaffirm the official story and close down all questions.

If David S. Chelsey’s claim is correct there seems no doubt that Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik were framed and murdered by sinister forces and left in the car to be found and blamed for fictional crimes.

The claim s made at the beginning of this interview.

Shooters’ family attorney: Everyone is clueless

Muslims: a good choice of offender.

Because the patsies, the designated offenders were Muslims, a group many Americans fear and hate, having been subjected to decades of fanatical Zionist propaganda, this strange mess of a psy-op is going to be widely believed, even compared with events like Aurora and Sandy Hook.

The hybrid nature of the narrative, means that today millions upon millions of people around the world are earnestly debating whether this infantile, clunker of a non-event was a terrorist attack or mere regulation mass shooting in the workplace. It was neither.

This is a classic psychological warfare tactic that is very effective, the phantom discourse, the duelling arguments anchored in illusion. The perpetrators simply press the right buttons and sit back and watch the inevitable Pavlovian response.

It is especially funny to consider that the creators of these disastrous and inept productions pat themselves on the back and consider themselves a race above and beyond the people they have brainwashed. It is especially amusing that they react quite viciously towards any who defy the designated version of these events despite the fact that anyone with eyes can see with these really bad ones that they are a total lie.

The IS Facebook Announcement.

The claim about the female member of the attack group posting her allegiance to the Islamic State on Facebook us especially silly. Think about it, you have decided to join a clandestine network of terrorists and attempt to conduct attacks in the US.

First step: climb on Facebook and provide the CIA, FBI, NSA and every other intelligence agency who own a computer full knowledge of your intentions!

None of these billion dollar heroes ever notice of course and this is solid evidence that they need a bigger budget, they must be shockingly under resourced to have missed something like that after all. It is not as if they need a warrant.

The overarching purpose is the one expressed by then CIA Director William Casey to President Ronald Reagan,

“We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”

Lies and deception are as a source of power, an ongoing goal of the US and other Western Governments, they believe in lies as a way of life for the people they pretend to serve.

One interesting aspect of the San Bernardino incident is that what seems to have been intended to be another gun/mind control psyop has seemingly morphed into an “IS supporters” attack apparently in order to satisfy the media demand for the terror narrative. The media are actually running with both psyops simultaneously according to their owners priorities.

This seems to be happening because the owners of the media are absolutely desperate for a large Western ground operation in Syria and until that is achieved, all other goals are secondary.

On the local level, the city of San Bernardino has been experiencing long term financial problems, the city is broke so when the men from the Federal Government popped up with the suggestion of turning one of the local drills into a faux operation, the people from San Bernardino presumably felt they had little choice but to agree and accept the promised injection of Federal spending that the city would receive for it’s service to the cause of deception.

Like this:

Chris Spivey is learning the hard way that the evil ones hate their lies being exposed.

August 19th, 2015.

The Prosecution of Chris Spivey.

Who is Chris Spivey?
Chris Spivey is a British online journalist responsible for most of the writing on the popular Chris Spivey the World Put Right website. An irreverent and coarse blast of truth in the face of the wicked British Establishment that has gathered a dedicated following since inception in 2012 and broken many important stories.

What has happened?
Chris Spivey was recently convicted in a British court of the crime of Harassment in relation to his investigation into the alleged killing of British soldier Lee Rigby in Woolwich, London in May 2013.

I have read all the mainstream media coverage on this case that I could find, and the Crown Prosecution Service media release yet in all honesty the specific nature of Spivey’s crime is completely unclear.
It is clear that part of the case against Chris Spivey relates to material posted on his website and the views he expressed about the Woolwich incident.

The CPS (Crown Prosecution Service) states that:

“The prosecution’s case was that the combination of the postings, containing a mixture of grossly offensive remarks about the Rigby family, upsetting assertions surrounding the murder, and the publication of details of two of the family’s homes, could not be justified under freedom of speech”

A Breach of Chris Spivey’s Human Rights?

Regardless of what happened in Woolwich there is no doubt that any prosecution that uses the fact that Spivey expressed contrary opinions as part of the evidence is appears to represent a breach Chris Spivey’s human rights as outlined in the UN Declaration of Human Rights and the EU Human Rights Charter as these unambiguously proclaim the right to freely express political views.

The EU Charter states in Article 10 that “Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion.”

Article 11 is more explicit

“Article 11 Freedom of expression and information

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.

2. The freedom and pluralism of the media shall be respected.”

If Britain’s corrupt leadership do not support the central tenets of the EU Charter they should explain why this is the case and begin immediate steps to withdraw from the EU and the United Nations. The British legal system appears to be operating in a manner that is inconsistent with the fundamental tenets of human rights as stated in both the EU Charter and the UN Declaration.

A Flawed Process?

It is also worth noting that the alleged victims did not appear before the court, all the evidence tendered was provided by the police who were the only witnesses.

Spivey was thus convicted without his counsel having the opportunity to question the witnesses against him in another clear breach of all legal norms and traditions, and a denial of natural justice.

If the alleged victim was so upset by Spivey’s claims why did the alleged victim take no action to curtail Spivey’s actions or simply ignore Spivey’s posts which had no material impact on her whatsoever and no realistic prospect of doing so?

The fact that Spivey is right, undoubtedly correct in the broad claim that Woolwich was a stage-managed and fabricated bit of psychological warfare against the people of Britain does not even matter. Even if Spivey was completely wrong, the prosecution would still be malicious, politically motivated and illegitimate.

The absurdity here is completely obvious. Do you think the woman with the shopping may have gone the other way home perhaps? Also look at the “killers” right hand.

Woolwich.

There is in fact no possibility whatsoever that the Woolwich incident was an authentic terrorist attack or anything of the sort. Analysis of the Woolwich event, even crude preliminary analysis makes it absolutely clear that there is no way known that this is anything more than a Benny Hill standard piece of street theater constructed and executed extremely poorly in full public view.

Woolwich was a made for TV faux event, with multiple cameras filming multiple takes, terrible special effects and a C grade cast of players.

The way to prove Woolwich manufactured is very simple. Watch it.

Woolwich killers being shot charging police,extended footage

Note that there is no blood present and that all the blood we see on the “killer” at all times has been digitally inserted. Something that is hard to miss because it also all disappears at certain stages of the event.

There is no good part of the story, none.

This is from the mainstream coverage of the case. The digital job was clearly very rushed and terribly shoddy. The lack of paint on the clothing was a major blunder. It is absurd.

The bad actor delivering the silly speech with the digitally inserted blood on his hands.

The terrorist killer who throws down his knife as he runs at the police and leaps through the air theatrically and positions himself halfway across the road where he moves his legs to cover the spot cues the handlers have left at the spot.

Oh dear! The chaps and chapettes of special effects had a short nap. These are the real hands of the man.

Commonsense and empathy.

Imagine yourself on a street where a man has just been butchered by jihadist nutters who are standing in the street armed with knives and firearms. You are out shopping in your local area, you eave the supermarket and you are waking home and you notice a dead body lying in the street and two large men prancing about with weapons.

Do you walk down that street, past the dead body in the middle of the road, past the knife wielding “blood spattered” large men ranting in the street or do you think you might walk home down a different street?

That’s right, you walk home down a different street as you do not want to walk past a “blood spattered” maniac who just hacked someone to death.

Except in Woolwich, where numerous shoppers walk blithely past the “blood spattered” knife wielding man and the body in the road.

It is hokum. Pure hokum.

Another “bystander” wanders past during the Woolwich farce.

The British Establishment Press.

There were a number of pieces in the corporate media regarding this case. Not one of them contained a single word of truth. It was both predictable and shocking. There was not a word about the possible implications for free speech in the conviction. Not a word.

All I would say to the members of the British Press is that your souls are in great danger and I hope it was worth it.

But I suspect that you may come to regret the way you have sold your soul to the forces of darkness and evil.

The choices you have made will resonate forever and one day you will reap what you have sown. I hope you understand what you have done.

Links to the genuinely nauseating, mainstream articles on this case are at the very bottom of the page.

A Pattern.

The legitimacy of a Government that has acted utterly cynically and made a further mockery of the rule of law in staging this event to frighten the people and cause them to hate and fear Muslims surely has to be questioned

Where does the public interest sit in staging these events?

What on earth gives the Government, or part of the Government the idea that they have the right to manipulate and deceive the people they are supposed to be serving.people and terrify them with lies?

This evil little stunt has genocidal implications when viewed in the light of Britain’s behavior over the preceding decade. This was an evil thing to do and it is truly so sad that we have been reduced to this pitiful state at any point in time let alone the present.For decades British Intelligence have been in the game of manufacturing terrorism in order to terrify and control the population. Whenever a villain has been required, they have obliged.

Staging this event was a very silly and wicked thing to do, but on the big scale of things, compared to some of the other things they have done, this is nothing. Quite literally.

Counter tactics.

The publication of addresses, while in no way or manner in my opinion constituting harassment, may be unwise in future. This appears to have been the element that enabled this dirty game of political prosecution to be played. It was the one fact that has been used to weave a grotesque lie around.

If this is the ploy that is being used to implement Cameron’s oft stated ambition of tyranny it might be counterproductive to publish personal details of alleged crisis actors and other perceived accomplices to the hoaxes and/or false flag events in future in order to prevent the corrupt Establishment from using this technique as a means to persecute and criminalise truth-tellers.

The Precedent is Clear.

If Spivey is imprisoned, as is at least possible (unthinkable but apparently possible) his case will become a very big cause very quickly and one consequence of that will be a major increase in public interest in alternate theories and a massive upsurge of interest in the Woolwich incident.

Do not think for a second that any of the things that have been done to Spivey cannot be done to you.
If Chris Spivey can be prosecuted for voicing a controversial opinion on the internet, anyone can be prosecuted for expressing any view on the internet or anywhere else.
Truth will clearly be no defense.

Therefore every possible political and legal effort must be made to overturn these convictions and to establish a precedent that ensures that such vindictive political prosecutions are never allowed to happen again.

I would encourage anyone with the ability to be in Essex on the morning of August 27th to attend the Essex District court and offer support to Chris Spivey. If not, make a phone call, write a letter. Be polite and firm. Do not let these people destroy your hard won liberty. DO SOMETHING! Enough is enough.

This is a test. This is a moment that cannot be allowed limply to pass. People need to make their feelings known (in a civilised and dignified way) and more importantly, a whole series of legal actions need to be undertaken against the British Government in every possible jurisdiction, from Europe, to the UN, to the local British courts until justice and human rights have been restored.

The British Prime Minister has repeatedly stated the intent to criminalise the very mention of the Big lies that define our age. This should be viewed as no less than a proxy claim of responsibility. Cameron’s handlers are especially concerned about London 7/7 and 911. I wonder why?

DAVID CAMERON in UN Speech Says ANYONE QUESTIONING the 9/11 Official Story Is a TERROR EXTREMIST