Federal employees want to do their jobs better but don’t believe their agencies are adequately supporting them, according to a new analysis.

Ninety-one percent of federal workers are motivated to improve their job performance while 57.2 percent reported feeling encouraged by their employers to do so, the study from the nonprofit Partnership for Public Service and consulting firm Deloitte found. Four out of 10 employees, or 36.3 percent, said their agencies rewarded creativity and innovation.

The government’s overall innovation score dipped 1.7 points, to 61.5 out of 100 points between 2011 and 2012. The analysis is part of the Partnership’s annual Best Places to Work in the Federal Government rankings and is based on the Office of Personnel Management’s 2012 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey. That survey includes feedback from more than 687,000 federal employees representing 362 agencies and subcomponents.

“Government is slipping on innovation at a time when its ability to be creative is paramount, given the increasing needs for its services and the reduction in available resources,” the report stated. Survey questions related to innovation asked respondents about opportunities at work to improve their skills, feelings of personal empowerment, incentives for providing superior products and services, respect for their agencies’ senior leaders and participation in decisions affecting their job.

The government should not be “satisfied or comfortable” with a 60ish score on innovation,” said Dan Helfrich, a principal at Deloitte Consulting LLP and head of its federal strategy and operations and human capital practice. “I see little reason why [strong results] can’t accrue to a broader set of government agencies, and therefore raise the overall score.”

Federal employees also scored 13 points lower overall than their private-sector counterparts when asked if their organizations encourage them to come up with ways to improve operations. One bright spot for the government: Several individual agencies, including NASA and the Surface Transportation Board, received scores higher than the private-sector benchmark, the analysis found.

The innovation scores of most agencies decreased between 2011 and 2012; however, about one-third of those included in the survey, including NASA, the Office of Management and Budget, and the Transportation Department showed improvement. NASA was the top-ranked large agency on innovation for the third year in a row, while the Federal Trade Commission and Surface Transportation Board took top honors among mid-size and small agencies, respectively.

The Social Security Administration, Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Federal Maritime Commission lost the most ground on innovation in their respective categories between 2011 and 2012, according to the Partnership’s snapshot. SSA’s score dropped 3.8 points to 61.6; NRC’s score fell 4 points to 69.9 and the Federal Maritime Commission lost 12.7 points for a score of 51.4 in 2012.

The Homeland Security Department ranked lowest on innovation among the large federal agencies, with a score of 52.7 points. Low morale has been a problem for DHS since its creation in 2003, although job satisfaction has improved since 2006, according to a November 2012 report from the Government Accountability Office.

The analysis encouraged federal managers to stress the importance of innovation, share specific examples of success with employees, solicit feedback, and offer “appropriate” incentives to reward innovation. “Give employees an avenue for sharing new ideas in team meetings, brainstorming sessions, or launching an employee competition,” the study said. “If an idea isn’t yet ready for implementation, don’t shoot it down immediately. Help employees refine the idea.”

Helfrich said innovation is not a consistent priority across government, but it should be, especially since testing ideas doesn’t require new funding or new people. “Creating a culture of innovation is the single least costly and most impactful way to improve government performance that we have at our disposal,” he said.

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or
otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and
has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems
to be in violation of this rule.

Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.