1996 Rover - Austin 800 Reviews - Page 3 of 3

Summary:

Faults:

Power windows have developed a minor fault and sometimes fail to operate, but always close when the alarm is set.

Other than this just general wear and tear. Tyres and pads etc.

Just starting to get the common dash top lift above the clocks, this can be rectified with the correct adhesive.

General Comments:

I was really surprised with the performance of the car considering it is so large and heavy.

The car has now had several modifications including s/s exhaust, turbo boost valve + gauge (fitted in place of the clock), filter induction kit and quickshift gear change. I've also uprated the brakes, 325mm grooved discs to the front (285mm standard) and vented on the rear. Ultra Xenon bulbs have been added to headlights and driving lights as the standard ones were fairly poor.

The car now produces 263BHP, and gets to 60 in 5.3 seconds. Sounds excellent and sees off everything at the lights, embarressing many a GTi, RS turbo and a few Scooby drivers.

I still get over 25mpg on average, and would recommend an 800 to anyone who is after a luxurious car with a low budget.

I enjoy driving this car now as much as when I first got it, it still makes me smile everytime.

1996 Rover - Austin 800 820i 2.0 from UK and Ireland

Summary:

Faults:

Water was getting into boot but this stopped when trim repaired/renewed.

Immobiliser sometimes difficult to deactivate.

General Comments:

I think this car is excellent value for money and was £1000 cheaper than an equivalent Mondeo when I bought it.

The faults are minor. It has never broken down or failed to start. There is bags of room in the back with 3 proper seats and belts. It is not very sporty but fast enough for most drivers including myself. Twin air bags and ABS were standard. I do not know why Rover has a bad reputation if this car is typical.