He wouldn't shake her hand _after_ the negotiation session. He's pouting because it didn't go as well as he thought it should....he was the loser.

Nope: "Trump refuses to shake woman's hand, who also happens to be the leader of Germany."

Sorry, but your narrative is FAKE NEWS.

__________________What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. ... The origin of myths is explained in this way.

Because if you shake hands with someone once, you can then never be accused of refusing to shake hands after: that person stays handshaken. Forever. So if I shake hands with someone before a meeting, and then snub a request for a handshake afterwards, I have not refused to shake hands with that person.

The narrative being promoted is that he is sexist because he didn't shake her hand.

That narrative is the fake news.

Now, being caught promoting fake news you are trying to backtrack on the narrative.

__________________What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. ... The origin of myths is explained in this way.

__________________What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. ... The origin of myths is explained in this way.

'I can't comment on investigations, or even if we are having investigations.'

__________________What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. ... The origin of myths is explained in this way.

Holy crap, Rep. Heck said this is like what happened at Pearl Harbor and 9/11.

Rep. Speier says this is war with Russia.

Democrats expose themselves as warmongers once again.

__________________What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. ... The origin of myths is explained in this way.

Ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) hardly rates as a household name. He’s a bit stiff, not your typical glad-handing politician. Nevertheless, with the primacy of the Russia investigation he has become a frequent face on TV news. His effective, precise arguments, delivered largely without hyperbole, are an effective counterpoint to the often hysterical White House utterances.

Is this just driven by the White House raising "I told you so" fake news supporting the Muslim ban? Or maybe just a standalone piece of Muslim-bashing?

Has the TSA always been prone to overreaction and heavy-handedness? A case study in sacrificing liberty for "security" and gaining victory only for the terrorists?

Or is there actually a recent but credible threat? Perhaps. They've claimed one; that means nothing. So now the terrorists will use other airlines and origin countries. They don't seem worried about that.

Ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) hardly rates as a household name. He’s a bit stiff, not your typical glad-handing politician. Nevertheless, with the primacy of the Russia investigation he has become a frequent face on TV news. His effective, precise arguments, delivered largely without hyperbole, are an effective counterpoint to the often hysterical White House utterances.

Quote:

“We will never know whether the Russian intervention was determinative in such a close election. Indeed, it is unknowable in a campaign in which so many small changes could have dictated a different result. More importantly, and for the purposes of our investigation, it simply does not matter. What does matter is this: The Russians successfully meddled in our democracy, and our intelligence agencies have concluded that they will do so again.”

He forgot to mention the part where the testimony was that Russia has been interfering with our elections since they were the Soviet Union.

The only new thing testified to which was different this time was that Russia was more open about it.

The testimony also said that Russia thought Clinton would win, and it wasn't about changing election result, it was about undermining the new administration .. so the question now is, are these democrats now Russian agents trying to undermine this administration?

__________________What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. ... The origin of myths is explained in this way.

You do know that the Washington Post is owned by Amazon who has a contract with the CIA? This is something that Congress should be investigating.

__________________What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. ... The origin of myths is explained in this way.

__________________What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. ... The origin of myths is explained in this way.

If you notice in that clip, Rep. Schiff claims the Russians hacked to get Sanders the win in the primaries ... so I guess Sanders is a Russian agent too?

__________________What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. ... The origin of myths is explained in this way.

If Sanders or his close associates colluded with the government that guided the hackers or received some sort of payment, say through sweetheart deals, house-sales at inflated prices, or convenient stock brokerage fees, then yes.

If Sanders or his close associates colluded with the government that guided the hackers or received some sort of payment, say through sweetheart deals, house-sales at inflated prices, or convenient stock brokerage fees, then yes.

To be clear, you are asserting that Trump is an agent of Russia, and the over six months of investigations under the Obama administration, Obama did nothing to stop this Russian agent from taking control of the most powerful office in the world.

__________________What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. ... The origin of myths is explained in this way.

Obviously Rep. Schiff is an agent of the Ukrainian government by your logic:

__________________What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. ... The origin of myths is explained in this way.