I doubt very much that a commissioner of the Australian government acting in his official capacity would do this, as it would indicate an existing mindset and not fact finding objectivity in the investigation. The role of an investigator is to find facts and not laugh at people under investigation. If it were true it could be a reflection of the government that put him in that position if such government lnew about it allowed him to continue in his appointed position.

My takeaway from these ARC hearings is that the Jehovah's Witnesses organization is a cruel religion!

Shouldnt you allow the investigation to continue and be completed and wait until the Australian government forms an opinion on the commission's findings and recommendations, then look at all of the facts, before forming a personal opinion?

I've been affiliated with this organization for 40+ years and am very familiar with the facts. I didn't need the ARC to tell me anything I don't already know about this cruel religion. The ARC just confirmed it!

Fisherman: Shouldnt you allow the investigation to continue and be completed and wait until the Australian government forms an opinion on the commission's findings and recommendations, then look at all of the facts, before forming a personal opinion?

The investigation has been completed. It is over. Done. Finished.

The commission has published their findings and recommendations. The findings were done. Finished. The recommendations were done. Finished.

The WT was deficient in their response in the last hearing.

What would someone have to wait on to form an opinion? Some stamp of approval/disapproval by the government of Australia? The Commission represents the government. The facts are in. What are you waiting for? Someone to tell you how to think?