33. Oh! the depth, etc. Here first the Apostle bursts into an exclamation, which arose spontaneously from a devout consideration of God’s dealings
with the faithful; then in passing he checks the boldness of impiety, which is wont to clamor against the judgments of God.
When therefore
we hear, Oh! the depth, this expression of wonder ought greatly to avail to the beating down of the presumption of our flesh; for after having spoken
from the word and by the Spirit of the Lord, being at length overcome by the sublimity of so great a mystery, he could not
do otherwise than wonder and exclaim, that, the riches of God’s wisdom are deeper than our reason can
penetrate to. Whenever then we enter on a discourse respecting the eternal counsels of God, let a bridle be always set
on our thoughts and tongue, so that after having spoken soberly and within the limits of God’s word, our reasoning may at
last end in admiration. Nor ought we to be ashamed, that if we are not wiser than he, who, having been taken into the third
heaven, saw mysteries to man ineffable, and who yet could find in this instance no other end designed but that he should thus
humble
himself.

Some render the words of Paul thus, “Oh! the deep riches, and wisdom, and knowledge of God!” as though the word βάθος was an adjective; and they take riches for abundance, but this seems to me strained, and I
have therefore no doubt but that he extols God’s deep riches of wisdom and knowledge.
374374 It has indeed been thought by many that πλούτου, riches, is a noun belonging to wisdom and knowledge, used, after the Hebrew
manner, instead of an adjective. It means abundance or exuberance. The sentence, according to our idiom, would then be, “O
the profundity of the abounding wisdom and knowledge of God!” The Apostle, as in the words, “the gifts and calling of God,”
adopts
an ascending scale, and mentions wisdom first, and then knowledge, which in point of order precedes it. Then in the
following clause, according to his usual practice, he retrogrades, and states first what belongs to knowledge — “judgments,”
decisions, divine decrees, such as knowledge determines; and then “ways,” actual proceedings, for the guiding of which wisdom
is necessary. Thus we see that his style is thoroughly Hebraistic. It appears from Poole’s Syn., that Origen, Chrysostom, and Theodoret connected “riches” with “depth,” “O the abounding depth,” etc.; but that Ambrose and Augustine connected it with “wisdom,” etc. The use of the term in
Ephesians 1:7, favors the last; for “the riches of his grace” mean clearly “his abounding grace.” But some, with Stuart, suppose that by “riches” here is meant God’s goodness or mercy, according to Romans 11:12, and Ephesians 3:8. And Stuart gives this version, “O the boundless goodness, and wisdom, and knowledge of God!” But this destroys the evident correspondence
that is to be found in the latter clause of the verse, except we take in the remaining portion of the chapter, and this perhaps
is what ought to be done. But if we do this, then πλούτου means “treasures, or blessings,” or copia beneficiorum,” as Schleusner expresses it. “Riches of Christ” mean the abounding blessings laid up in him, Ephesians 3:8. God may be viewed as set forth here as the source of all things, and as infinite in wisdom and knowledge; and these three things are the subjects to the end of the chapter, the two last verses referring to the first, and the end of the thirty-third
and the thirty-fourth to the two others, and in an inverted order. The depth or vastness of his wealth or bounty is such,
that he has nothing but his own, no one having given him anything, (Romans 11:35,) and from him,
and through him, and to him are all things, (Romans 11:36.) Then as to the vastness of his wisdom and of his knowledge; what his knowledge has decided cannot be searched out, and
what his wisdom has devised, as to the manner of executing his purposes, cannot be investigated; and no one can measure the
extent of his knowledge, and no one has been his counselor, so as to add to the
stores of his wisdom, (Romans 11:34.) That we may see the whole passage in lines —33. Oh the depth of God’s bounty and wisdom and knowledge!How inscrutable his judgmentsAnd untraceable his ways!34. Who indeed hath known the Lord’s mind,Or who has become his counselor?35. Or who has first given to him?And it shall be repayed to him:36. For from him and through him and to him are all things:To him the glory for ever. — Amen. — Ed.

How incomprehensible, etc. By different words, according to a practice common in Hebrew, he expresses the same thing. For he speaks of judgments, then he subjoins ways, which mean appointments or the mode of acting, or the manner of ruling. But he still continues his exclamation, and thus the
more he elevates the height of the divine mystery, the more he deters us from the curiosity of investigating it. Let us then
learn to make no searchings respecting the Lord, except as far as he has revealed himself in the Scriptures; for otherwise
we shall enter a labyrinth, from which the
retreat is not easy. It must however be noticed, that he speaks not here of all God’s mysteries, but of those which are
hid with God himself, and ought to be only admired and adored by us.

34. Who has known the mind of the Lord? He begins here to extend as it were his hand to restrain the audacity of men, lest they should clamor against God’s judgments,
and this he does by stating two reasons: the first is, that all mortals are too blind to take a view of God’s predestination
by their own
understanding, and to reason on a thing unknown is presumptuous and absurd; the other is, that we can have no cause of
complaint against God, since no mortal can boast that God is a debtor to him; but that, on the contrary, all are under obligations
to him for his bounty.
375375 The words of this verse seem to have been taken literally from Isaiah 40:13, as given in the Septuagint. The Hebrew is in some measure different, but the words will admit of a rendering approaching nearer to the meaning here
than what is presented in our version, as follows — Who has weighed the spirit of Jehovah,And, being a man of his counsel, has taught him? To “weigh the spirit” is to know it thoroughly: the same verb, תכן, is used in this sense in Proverbs 16:2; Proverbs
24:12. It indeed means to compute by measure or by weight; so that it may be rendered “measure” as well as “weigh,” and if we adopt
“measure,” it will then appear that to “know the mind of the Lord,” is to know the extent of his understanding or knowledge; an idea which remarkably corresponds with the passage. — Ed.

Within this limit then let every one remember to keep his own mind, lest he be carried beyond God’s oracles in investigating
predestination, since we hear that man can distinguish nothing in this case, any more than a blind man in darkness. This caution,
however, is not to be so applied as to weaken the certainty of faith, which proceeds not from the acumen of the human mind,
but solely from the illumination of the Spirit; for Paul himself
in another place, after having testified that all the mysteries of God far exceed the comprehension of our minds, immediately
subjoins that the faithful understand the mind of the Lord, because they have not received the spirit of this world, but the
Spirit which has been given them by God, by whom they are instructed as to his goodness, which otherwise would be incomprehensible
to them.

As then we cannot by our own faculties examine the secrets of God, so we are admitted into a certain and clear knowledge of
them by the grace of the Holy Spirit: and if we ought to follow the guidance of the Spirit, where he leaves us, there we ought
to stop and as it were to fix our standing. If any one will seek to know more than what God has revealed, he shall be overwhelmed
with the immeasurable brightness of inaccessible light. But we
must bear in mind the distinction, which I have before mentioned, between the secret counsel of God, and his will made
known in Scripture; for though the whole doctrine of Scripture surpasses in its height the mind of man, yet an access to it
is not closed against the faithful, who reverently and soberly follow the Spirit as their guide; but the case is different
with regard to his hidden counsel, the depth and height of which cannot by any investigation be reached.

35. Who has first given to him, etc. Another reason, by which God’s righteousness is most effectually defended against all the accusations of the ungodly: for
if no one retains him bound to himself by his own merits, no one can justly expostulate with him for not having received his
reward; as he, who would constrain another to do him good, must necessarily adduce those deeds by which he has deserved
a reward. The import then of Paul’s words is this — “God cannot be charged with unrighteousness, except it can be proved,
that he renders not to every one his due: but it is evident, that no one is deprived by him of his right, since he is under
obligation to none; for who can boast of any thing of his own, by which he has deserved his favor?”
376376 There is a passage in Job 41:11, 12, (in the Hebrew Bible,) of which this verse seems to be a translation, made by the Apostle himself, as totally another meaning
is given in the Septuagint. The person is alone changed. The Hebrew is literally this, Who has anticipated me,And I will repay? To “anticipate” means here with favor or gift; for the remainder of the verse is the following, —Everything under the whole heaven, mine it is. — Ed.

Now this is a remarkable passage; for we are here taught, that it is not in our power to constrain God by our good works to
bestow salvation on us, but that he anticipates the undeserving by his gratuitous goodness. But if we desire to make an honest
examination, we shall not only find, that God is in no way a debtor to us, but that we are all subject to his judgment, —
that we not only deserve no layout, but that we are worthy of eternal
death. And Paul not only concludes, that God owes us nothing, on account of our corrupt and sinful nature; but he denies,
that if man were perfect, he could bring anything before God, by which he could gain his favor; for as soon as he begins to
exist, he is already by the right of creation so much indebted to his Maker, that he has nothing of his own. In vain then
shall we try to take from him his own right, that he should not, as he pleases, freely determine respecting his own creatures,
as
though there was mutual debt and credit.

36. For from him and through him, etc. A confirmation of the last verse. He shows, that it is very far from being the case, that we can glory in any good thing
of our own against God, since we have been created by him from nothing, and
now exist through him. He hence infers, that our being should be employed for his glory: for how unreasonable would it
be for creatures, whom he has formed and whom he sustains, to live for any other purpose than for making his glory known?
It has not escaped my notice, that the phrase, εἰς αὐτὸν, to him, is sometimes taken for ἐν αὐτῷ, in or by him, but improperly: and as its proper meaning is more suitable to the present subject, it is better to retain it, than to adopt
that which is improper. The import of what is said is, — That the whole order of nature would be strangely subverted, were
not God, who is the beginning of all things, the end also.

To him be glory, etc. The proposition being as it were proved, he now confidently assumes it as indubitable, — That the Lord’s own glory ought everywhere
to continue to him unchangeably: for the sentence would be frigid were it taken generally; but its emphasis depends on the
context, that. God justly claims for himself absolute
supremacy, and that in the condition of mankind and of the whole world nothing is to be sought beyond his own glory. It
hence follows, that absurd and contrary to reason, and even insane, are all those sentiments which tend to diminish his glory.

372 “Incomprehensibilia,” so the Vulgate; “ἀνεξερεύνητα — inscrutabilia — inscrutable,” Beza. It means what cannot be found out by searching. Our version conveys the
correct idea — “unsearchable.” — Ed.

373 “Impervestigabiles,” so Beza; “ἀνεξιχνίαστοι — investigabiles — ininvestigable,” Vulgate; what cannot be investigated, and of which there are no footsteps — untraceable; “cannot be traced out” is the version of
Doddridge. — Ed.

374 It has indeed been thought by many that πλούτου, riches, is a noun belonging to wisdom and knowledge, used, after the Hebrew
manner, instead of an adjective. It means abundance or exuberance. The sentence, according to our idiom, would then be, “O
the profundity of the abounding wisdom and knowledge of God!” The Apostle, as in the words, “the gifts and calling of God,”
adopts
an ascending scale, and mentions wisdom first, and then knowledge, which in point of order precedes it. Then in the
following clause, according to his usual practice, he retrogrades, and states first what belongs to knowledge — “judgments,”
decisions, divine decrees, such as knowledge determines; and then “ways,” actual proceedings, for the guiding of which wisdom
is necessary. Thus we see that his style is thoroughly Hebraistic. It appears from Poole’s Syn., that Origen, Chrysostom, and Theodoret connected “riches” with “depth,” “O the abounding depth,” etc.; but that Ambrose and Augustine connected it with “wisdom,” etc. The use of the term in
Ephesians 1:7, favors the last; for “the riches of his grace” mean clearly “his abounding grace.” But some, with Stuart, suppose that by “riches” here is meant God’s goodness or mercy, according to Romans 11:12, and Ephesians 3:8. And Stuart gives this version, “O the boundless goodness, and wisdom, and knowledge of God!” But this destroys the evident correspondence
that is to be found in the latter clause of the verse, except we take in the remaining portion of the chapter, and this perhaps
is what ought to be done. But if we do this, then πλούτου means “treasures, or blessings,” or copia beneficiorum,” as Schleusner expresses it. “Riches of Christ” mean the abounding blessings laid up in him, Ephesians 3:8. God may be viewed as set forth here as the source of all things, and as infinite in wisdom and knowledge; and these three things are the subjects to the end of the chapter, the two last verses referring to the first, and the end of the thirty-third
and the thirty-fourth to the two others, and in an inverted order. The depth or vastness of his wealth or bounty is such,
that he has nothing but his own, no one having given him anything, (Romans 11:35,) and from him,
and through him, and to him are all things, (Romans 11:36.) Then as to the vastness of his wisdom and of his knowledge; what his knowledge has decided cannot be searched out, and
what his wisdom has devised, as to the manner of executing his purposes, cannot be investigated; and no one can measure the
extent of his knowledge, and no one has been his counselor, so as to add to the
stores of his wisdom, (Romans 11:34.) That we may see the whole passage in lines —33. Oh the depth of God’s bounty and wisdom and knowledge!How inscrutable his judgmentsAnd untraceable his ways!34. Who indeed hath known the Lord’s mind,Or who has become his counselor?35. Or who has first given to him?And it shall be repayed to him:36. For from him and through him and to him are all things:To him the glory for ever. — Amen. — Ed.

375 The words of this verse seem to have been taken literally from Isaiah 40:13, as given in the Septuagint. The Hebrew is in some measure different, but the words will admit of a rendering approaching nearer to the meaning here
than what is presented in our version, as follows — Who has weighed the spirit of Jehovah,And, being a man of his counsel, has taught him? To “weigh the spirit” is to know it thoroughly: the same verb, תכן, is used in this sense in Proverbs 16:2; Proverbs
24:12. It indeed means to compute by measure or by weight; so that it may be rendered “measure” as well as “weigh,” and if we adopt
“measure,” it will then appear that to “know the mind of the Lord,” is to know the extent of his understanding or knowledge; an idea which remarkably corresponds with the passage. — Ed.

376 There is a passage in Job 41:11, 12, (in the Hebrew Bible,) of which this verse seems to be a translation, made by the Apostle himself, as totally another meaning
is given in the Septuagint. The person is alone changed. The Hebrew is literally this, Who has anticipated me,And I will repay? To “anticipate” means here with favor or gift; for the remainder of the verse is the following, —Everything under the whole heaven, mine it is. — Ed.