Specter: something widely feared as a possible unpleasant or dangerous occurrence, ie, the specter of nuclear holocaust. How about the specter of Specters' obvious ploy to try and get re-elected as a new something. I think people are catching onto this type of tomfoolery and it is going to bite them and him right on his and their proverbial hinder parts.

Arlen's return to his beloved Democrat Party, to me, is a welcomed event seeing that he once defected as a Democrat into the Republican Tent to, wait for it, win an election. The man is a two-faced coward and only cares about his political carreer. Nothing more and nothing less. The constituents mean nothing to cretins like himself in either Party. Unfortunately for him, and fortunately for the Nation, the democrats in his "new" district know what he is as well and that is a fraud. Surely the Republicans that voted Republican because that is their tradition won't be voting for him and, apparently, he was going to loose hugely in 2010. I wonder why that is? As the democrats laud his re-defection and welcome him into the fold, the underpinnings of his actions are unpleasant for both he and his "new found" loyalty.

The defection of Arlen Specter from the Republican Party to the Democratic Party has stirred up a lot of political debate over what his change of party affiliation truly means. The Democrats, or at least a large portion of them, speculate that Specter walking the plank, jumping up and down a few times, and then taking a swan dive onto the quarterdeck of the party of Leftward ideologies, is evidence that the Republican Party’s ship is sinking, and that Arlen was smart to abandon the party before the entire vessel winds up lying on the bottom of the ocean of political history as yet another failed party that was unable to change with the times.

The Conservative base of the Republican Party is essentially proclaiming “good riddance,” and I am in agreement with those folks. Rather than have a liberal Republican stay and try to change the party, I would rather him go where he feels he belongs. [...]

That's Doug's opening volley.

We all know it was a power grab, again, and as The Hill reported several days ago, a whole herd of Democrats are none too happy about this development. Apparently the Demorepublicratican is going to hold onto his power-play positions, walking all over those waiting in the winds for their shot at power. Specter screwed them all and Reid let him. Curt over at Flopping Aces says, "Poetic justice for a selfish nimrod." AMEN! Democrats: culture of selfishness and self-absorption. That goes for the Democrats in drag in the GOP as well, McCain included.

Arlen Boy proved he was a Democrat by employing that blatant lie that the Republican Party has moved too far to the Right since Reagan. He has said that twice that I have heard so far this past week. What a fool - a bumbling fool to boot. Now, giving credit where credit is due, perhaps his line of reasoning for that statement can be explained thusly.

When compared to his current train of thought, as it has been for decades, the GOP is to the Right of himself as his voting records do reveal. Perhaps that is what he meant - the GOP hasn't moved to the Left fast enough so, therefore, it has moved Right. For those of us paying attention, the Big Lie that the GOP has moved to the far right, is confirmation that the "New Centrists" has been redefined. Looking at the new political science map, he just may be correct. So, our job is to define the political science map correctly. Behold:

The above is the correctly identified spectrum, spectrum being the root term for specter. Odd, isn't it? Yeah, I know some Latin. Most of the modern-era graphs will not have Anarchy included which, by the way is the Far Right and Conservatism is no where close to being "anarchish". Conservatism is about We The People, smaller government, law and order, whereas the Far Left is all about government does everything and you have to suck it up and shut up about it, or else. Check sphincter Specters' voting records and check it our for yourself. Specter is your typical Democrat Fraud...says one thing to give the impression that he means what he says but hides his poli-speak for that inevitable plausible deniability maneuver. Watch for it. It's coming.

Oh, before I forget, the picture top-left-above is a slap in the face for those other Democrats in drag, I mean those National Repiblicans that "got behind" Specter because he was tanking in the polls and being threatened by that damn Conservative Toomey guy. That's what happens when a REAL Conservative is on the ballots, people. It wins every time. Even in these troubled times. Get over libtards. It is hard to hide the facts no matter how hard you try. You know and we know it. We are coming for you. Bank it.

The specter of Arlen Specter ain't done yet. He has pissed off the Democrats and has pleased the Conservatives and Conservatives are what really matters. This whole issue has proven our points and it is catching on. We are right!

Specter: I Want a Coleman Win — ATTENTION, LIBERAL BLOGGERS (AND AL FRANKEN)!!! — The new Democrat says the Minnesota Republican should return to the Senate. — “There's still time for the Minnesota courts to do justice and declare Norm Coleman the winner.”

Specter Wants Coleman To Win In Minnesota — Memo to Sen. Arlen Specter (RD-PA): You're supposed to be a Democrat now. — In an interview with the New York Times, Specter stated in no uncertain terms that he wants Norm Coleman to win the disputed Minnesota Senate race …

Sestak: We Don't Need The GOP's Benedict Arnolds — Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA) hasn't been shy about criticizing Sen. Arlen Specter (D-PA) for switching parties last week, but his harshest words came last night in an interview with TPMDC: “He left the fight,” said the former admiral …

You are free to share, to copy, distribute and transmit the work to remix, to adapt the work under the following conditions: Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author's moral rights.
''