David Moenning is a the Chief Investment Officer at Heritage Capital, which focuses on active risk management of the U.S. stock market. Dave is also the proprietor of StateoftheMarkets.com, which provides free and subscription-based portfolio services. Dave began his investment career in 1980... More

To be sure, the current stock market seems to have little memory from one day to the next. This is evidenced by the fact that Monday's gain marked the first time since February 17 that the S&P 500 managed to put in back-to-back gains over even a two-day period. And given that the market now appears to be well on its way to the 12th direction change in the last 4 months, to say that things have been volatile is perhaps the understatement of the year so far.

Stocks closed out Friday looking weak. Sure, the screens were green as the closing bell rang. But after the big downdrafts seen on Wednesday and Thursday, Friday's rebound seemed like it belonged in the "uninspired" category. As such, the bears were out in force over the weekend, telling anyone willing to listen that this was it; the big one was finally upon us.

Our furry friends talked about the out-and-out dive in earnings expectations. They shouted about the weak economic data. And they pronounced that lofty valuations meant that the end was nigh for one of the greatest bull market runs in history.

But then Monday arrived. And with it, a 263 point joyride to the upside for the venerable Dow Jones Industrial Average. And while there is little doubt that the algos chased their tails once again yesterday, likely exaggerating the move in the process (don't get me started), there did appear to be a couple of catalysts that were indeed worthy of some buying.

Maybe She Actually Was As Dovish As She Sounded

One of the excuses du jour given for the outsized gains in stocks on Monday was the idea that Janet Yellen's speech Friday afternoon sounded a bit more dovish than the party lines that had been offered up by various other Fed officials last week. If you will recall, stocks vaulted higher after the recent Fed meeting because Ms. Yellen's comments sounded a lot friendlier than had been anticipated.

If you will recall, Janet Yellen appeared to be winking wryly at the cameras during her press conference as she all but assured investors that the Fed was still a friend to the stock market.

However, part of last week's dive was attributed to the idea that a handful of Fed Governors had failed to join Yellen in the uber-Dove zone when they had their chances in front of the microphones. No, the fact that Bullard, Evans, and friends didn't go the extra mile to imply that the FOMC wasn't likely to begin hiking rates in June left traders feeling like they had misinterpreted Yellen's words.

So, the fact that the Fed Chair used Friday's speech as an opportunity to reinforce her economy friendly views suggested to traders that their initial takeaway from Yellen's press conference were correct. So, why not return the indices to where they stood after the FOMC meeting? Why not, indeed.

Wait, What... QE in China?

The other catalyst for Monday's little jaunt was the use of the words "Quantitative Easing" and "China" in the same sentence. And if you find yourself surprised that the Chinese would even consider joining the QE party, join the club.

But cutting to the chase, the topic of China's monetary policy was in focus again overnight as PBoC Governor Zhou noted his country's growth rate had fallen too far and expressed concern about declining inflation (gee, that has a familiar ring to it, doesn't it?). The country's head banker highlighted the need to be vigilant about deflation and suggested that China has room to act on both rates and "quantitative measures."

So with the ECB printing up €60 billion a month, the Japanese running the presses 24/7, and China now hinting at the idea of a QE program, the watchword of the day on Monday seemed to be "Party On, Wayne!"

The only question, of course, is how long the party will last this time - 1 day, 2 days, maybe even 3???

Turning to This Morning...

And just like that, Monday's jubilant mood is gone. With the exception of Hong Kong, all the major foreign markets are in the red and perhaps more importantly, none saw fit to follow Wall Street higher. As such, the up-one-day, down-the-next market that we've been enjoying for the past four months looks like it will continue unabated on the last day of Q1. Although China announced that it will launch deposit insurance in May and there is more rumblings of stimulative action, Chinese markets took a break from their recent tear and finished lower. Speaking of lower, European bourses are down across the board as talk of "tapering" the ECB's QE program (which is less than one month old, for the record) has folks worrying that the ECB will once again do too little to have any meaningful impact. In addition, there is Greece and the geopolitical mess in Iran. Thus, it is not terribly surprising to see traders in the U.S. forget all about yesterday and prepare to go the other way once again. U.S. stock futures are currently pointing to a down open on Wall Street.

Pre-Game Indicators

Here are the Pre-Market indicators we review each morning before the opening bell...

"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something." - Plato

Current Market Drivers

We strive to identify the driving forces behind the market action on a daily basis. The thinking is that if we can both identify and understand why stocks are doing what they are doing on a short-term basis; we are not likely to be surprised/blind-sided by a big move. Listed below are what we believe to be the driving forces of the current market (Listed in order of importance).

1. The State of Fed/ECB Policy2. The State of the U.S. Economy3. The State of the Earnings Season4. The State of the U.S. Dollar

The State of the Trend

We believe it is important to analyze the market using multiple time-frames. We define short-term as 3 days to 3 weeks, intermediate-term as 3 weeks to 3 months, and long-term as 3 months or more. Below are our current ratings of the three primary trends:

Traders as well as computerized algorithms are generally keenly aware of the important technical levels on the charts from a short-term basis. Below are the levels we deem important to watch today:

Key Near-Term Support Zone(s) for S&P 500: 2040

Key Near-Term Resistance Zone(s): 2120

The State of the Tape

Momentum indicators are designed to tell us about the technical health of a trend - I.E. if there is any "oomph" behind the move. Below are a handful of our favorite indicators relating to the market's "mo"...

Trend and Breadth Confirmation Indicator (Short-Term): Neutral

Price Thrust Indicator: Neutral

Volume Thrust Indicator: Neutral

Breadth Thrust Indicator: Neutral

Bull/Bear Volume Relationship: Positive

Technical Health of 100+ Industry Groups: Moderately Positive

The Early Warning Indicators

Markets travel in cycles. Thus we must constantly be on the lookout for changes in the direction of the trend. Looking at market sentiment and the overbought/sold conditions can provide "early warning signs" that a trend change may be near.

Trend and Breadth Confirmation Indicator (Short-Term) Explained: History shows the most reliable market moves tend to occur when the breadth indices are in gear with the major market averages. When the breadth measures diverge, investors should take note that a trend reversal may be at hand. This indicator incorporates an All-Cap Dollar Weighted Equity Series and A/D Line. From 1998, when the A/D line is above its 5-day smoothing and the All-Cap Equal Weighted Equity Series is above its 25-day smoothing, the equity index has gained at a rate of +32.5% per year. When one of the indicators is above its smoothing, the equity index has gained at a rate of +13.3% per year. And when both are below, the equity index has lost +23.6% per year.

Price Thrust Indicator Explained: This indicator measures the 3-day rate of change of the Value Line Composite relative to the standard deviation of the 30-day average. When the Value Line's 3-day rate of change have moved above 0.5 standard deviation of the 30-day average ROC, a "thrust" occurs and since 2000, the Value Line Composite has gained ground at a rate of +20.6% per year. When the indicator is below 0.5 standard deviation of the 30-day, the Value Line has lost ground at a rate of -10.0% per year. And when neutral, the Value Line has gained at a rate of +5.9% per year.

Volume Thrust Indicator Explained: This indicator uses NASDAQ volume data to indicate bullish and bearish conditions for the NASDAQ Composite Index. The indicator plots the ratio of the 10-day total of NASDAQ daily advancing volume (i.e., the total volume traded in stocks which rose in price each day) to the 10-day total of daily declining volume (volume traded in stocks which fell each day). This ratio indicates when advancing stocks are attracting the majority of the volume (readings above 1.0) and when declining stocks are seeing the heaviest trading (readings below 1.0). This indicator thus supports the case that a rising market supported by heavier volume in the advancing issues tends to be the most bullish condition, while a declining market with downside volume dominating confirms bearish conditions. When in a positive mode, the NASDAQ Composite has gained at a rate of +38.3% per year, When neutral, the NASDAQ has gained at a rate of +13.3% per year. And when negative, the NASDAQ has lost at a rate of -8.5% per year.

Breadth Thrust Indicator Explained: This indicator uses the number of NASDAQ-listed stocks advancing and declining to indicate bullish or bearish breadth conditions for the NASDAQ Composite. The indicator plots the ratio of the 10-day total of the number of stocks rising on the NASDAQ each day to the 10-day total of the number of stocks declining each day. Using 10-day totals smooths the random daily fluctuations and gives indications on an intermediate-term basis. As expected, the NASDAQ Composite performs much better when the 10-day A/D ratio is high (strong breadth) and worse when the indicator is in its lower mode (weak breadth). The most bullish conditions for the NASDAQ when the 10-day A/D indicator is not only high, but has recently posted an extreme high reading and thus indicated a thrust of upside momentum. Bearish conditions are confirmed when the indicator is low and has recently signaled a downside breadth thrust. In positive mode, the NASDAQ has gained at a rate of +22.1% per year since 1981. In a neutral mode, the NASDAQ has gained at a rate of +14.5% per year. And when in a negative mode, the NASDAQ has lost at a rate of -6.4% per year.

Bull/Bear Volume Relationship Explained: This indicator plots both "supply" and "demand" volume lines. When the Demand Volume line is above the Supply Volume line, the indicator is bullish. From 1981, the stock market has gained at an average annual rate of +11.7% per year when in a bullish mode. When the Demand Volume line is below the Supply Volume line, the indicator is bearish. When the indicator has been bearish, the market has lost ground at a rate of -6.1% per year.

Technical Health of 100 Industry Groups Explained: Designed to provide a reading on the technical health of the overall market, this indicator takes the technical temperature of more than 100 industry sectors each week. Looking back to early 1980, when the model is rated as "positive," the S&P has averaged returns in excess of 23% per year. When the model carries a "neutral" reading, the S&P has returned over 11% per year. But when the model is rated "negative," stocks fall by more than -13% a year on average.

Weekly State of the Market Model Reading Explained:Different market environments require different investing strategies. To help us identify the current environment, we look to our longer-term State of the Market Model. This model is designed to tell us when risk factors are high, low, or uncertain. In short, this longer-term oriented, weekly model tells us whether the odds favor the bulls, bears, or neither team.

Disclosures

The opinions and forecasts expressed herein are those of Mr. David Moenning and may not actually come to pass. Mr. Moenning's opinions and viewpoints regarding the future of the markets should not be construed as recommendations. The analysis and information in this report is for informational purposes only. No part of the material presented in this report is intended as an investment recommendation or investment advice. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed nor any Portfolio constitutes a solicitation to purchase or sell securities or any investment program.

Any investment decisions must in all cases be made by the reader or by his or her investment adviser. Do NOT ever purchase any security without doing sufficient research. There is no guarantee that the investment objectives outlined will actually come to pass. All opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Neither the editor, employees, nor any of their affiliates shall have any liability for any loss sustained by anyone who has relied on the information provided.

The analysis provided is based on both technical and fundamental research and is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Although the information contained is derived from sources which are believed to be reliable, they cannot be guaranteed.

David D. Moenning, an advisor representative of CONCERT Wealth Management Inc. (CONCERT), is founder of Heritage Capital Advisors LLC, a legal business entity doing business as Heritage Capital Research (Heritage). Advisory services are offered through CONCERT Wealth Management, Inc., a registered investment advisor. For a complete description of investment risks, fees and services review the CONCERT firm brochure (ADV Part 2) which is available from your Investment Representative or by contacting Heritage or CONCERT.

Mr. Moenning is also the owner of Heritage Capital Management (HCM) a state-registered investment adviser. HCM also serves as a sub-advisor to other investment advisory firms. Neither HCM, Heritage, or CONCERT is registered as a broker-dealer.

Employees and affiliates of Heritage and HCM may at times have positions in the securities referred to and may make purchases or sales of these securities while publications are in circulation. Editors will indicate whether they or Heritage/HCM has a position in stocks or other securities mentioned in any publication. The disclosures will be accurate as of the time of publication and may change thereafter without notice.

Investments in equities carry an inherent element of risk including the potential for significant loss of principal. Past performance is not an indication of future results.

If you've been paying attention, it should come as no surprise to learn that US equities continued to remain under pressure last week. For those keeping score at home, take note that the S&P 500 suffered the second largest weekly pullback of 2015 and has now finished lower in four of the last five weeks.

With no glaring headlines since the FOMC meeting to drive the action, one has to fo a little digging to identify the issues the market seems to be struggling with. And while this market can and often does change directions in the blink of an eye (which takes, on average, between 300 and 400 milliseconds), traders seem to currently be focused on the Fed, the expectations for the upcoming earnings parade, the ongoing spate of punk economic data, as well as valuation concerns in areas such as biotech and semiconductors.

Not As Dovish As She Seemed?

One of the primary themes over the past week has been the idea that the Fed isn't really as dovish as Ms. Yellen's comments led many to believe after last week's FOMC press conference. In fact, there has been a fair amount of talk about the stock market rally in response to Yellen's dovish commentary being overdone.

If one listened to the latest flurry of Fedspeak that included Williams, Evans, Lockhart, Bullard, and Fischer last week, it was clear that nobody really changed their tune. As such, this seems to suggest that not much has not really changed in terms of the overall Fed narrative.

Earnings In Focus

Last week also saw a continued string negative earnings preannouncements for Q1 with worries about oil, the dollar, and the weather blamed as the major headwinds. According to FactSet, S&P 500 earnings expectations for Q1 have fallen by 8.2% since the beginning of the year, which represents the largest decline in the estimates since the first quarter of 2009.

FactSet also reported that as a result of the downward revisions, the Street is now looking for a -4.6% decline in Q1 S&P 500 earnings per share, which is down from expectations for +4.2% growth at the start of the quarter. And if you find yourself wondering why stocks would be able to rally in the face of falling earnings, you are not alone.

Not surprisingly, the energy sector has seen an outsized amount of revisions on the back of the sharp decline in oil prices. In addition, dollar strength has been the other big driver of earnings "resets." Finally, the crummy winter weather and protracted West Coast port strike were some of the other common themes coming from corporate America last week. As such, you can rest assured that traders will be listening to the each and every earnings report very carefully in the coming weeks.

Not a Bubble, But...

While all the recent talk of bubbles seems a bit humorous to anyone who was in this business in 1999, there is no denying that stocks are reaching overvalued levels when viewed through any traditional absolute valuation lens. In addition valuation concerns seem to be front and center at the present time in some of the mo-mo plays such as biotech and semiconductors.

For example, after finishing higher in each of the six previous weeks and gaining 16% during the run, the Nasdaq Biotech Index lost 5.3% last week. Granted one glance at a weekly chart of the IBB will quickly suggest that a pullback was overdue. However, one can't help but recall the "Mo-Mo Meltdown" that took place at this time last year and as such, there is some concern that traders may go back to the well on this trade.

Semis were also under pressure last week with the SOX down 5% on the week and falling 4.6% on Wednesday alone. The primary catalysts for the selling included negative preannouncements and talk of a slowdown in demand over the last four to five weeks due to FX pressures.

It's The Economy, Or Is It?

Finally, the recent trend of softer US economic data, particularly in the manufacturing sector, has been highlighted as another overhang for the markets recently. But, given the fact that most everybody on the planet knows that the weather and the port strike are the primary reasons for the weak data, traders have been giving the data a pass lately.

The key here will be to watch the data in the coming months. Should the reports remain on the punk side, you can rest assured that traders and their computers will notice as the topic of yet another "soft patch" could take center stage. Yet a great many analysts expect to see the data pick up going forward, a dynamic that would seem to confirm the "blame it on the weather" theme.

So there you have it. Although stocks are not really cratering and there isn't much fear in the air at this time, there is no denying that issues such as economic data and earnings might become a problem for this market if things don't perk up. But then again, this market may change directions 9 or 10 more times before any of these issues really present themselves.

Turning to This Morning...

The mood in the markets appears to be much improved in the early going on this fine Monday morning. Gone are the fears about the economy, valuations, earnings and what Ms. Yellen's merry band of central bankers are going to do next (and when). No, this morning, traders are celebrating the fact that China appears poised to do more to stimulate their fledgling economy. With reports over the weekend suggesting that Q1 GDP could come in well below the 7% target level, there is more talk of stimulative measures. In fact the PBoC kicked things off this morning by lowering down payment requirements for home buyers. Across the pond, bourses in Europe are up nicely as there are no new negatives to report. And here at home, the potential merger between Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) and Altera (NASDAQ:ALTR) announced Friday seems to have traders doing an about-face on the subject of valuations in the semiconductor space. U.S. stock futures are currently pointing to a strong open on Wall Street.

Pre-Game Indicators

Here are the Pre-Market indicators we review each morning before the opening bell...

"You've got to be very careful if you don't know where you are going because you might not get there." -- Yogi Berra

Current Market Drivers

We strive to identify the driving forces behind the market action on a daily basis. The thinking is that if we can both identify and understand why stocks are doing what they are doing on a short-term basis; we are not likely to be surprised/blind-sided by a big move. Listed below are what we believe to be the driving forces of the current market (Listed in order of importance).

1. The State of Fed/ECB Policy2. The State of the U.S. Economy3. The State of the U.S. Dollar4. The State of the Earnings Season

The State of the Trend

We believe it is important to analyze the market using multiple time-frames. We define short-term as 3 days to 3 weeks, intermediate-term as 3 weeks to 3 months, and long-term as 3 months or more. Below are our current ratings of the three primary trends:

Traders as well as computerized algorithms are generally keenly aware of the important technical levels on the charts from a short-term basis. Below are the levels we deem important to watch today:

Key Near-Term Support Zone(s) for S&P 500: 2040

Key Near-Term Resistance Zone(s): 2120

The State of the Tape

Momentum indicators are designed to tell us about the technical health of a trend - I.E. if there is any "oomph" behind the move. Below are a handful of our favorite indicators relating to the market's "mo"...

Trend and Breadth Confirmation Indicator (Short-Term): Negative

Price Thrust Indicator: Neutral

Volume Thrust Indicator: Neutral

Breadth Thrust Indicator: Neutral

Bull/Bear Volume Relationship: Positive

Technical Health of 100+ Industry Groups: Moderately Positive

The Early Warning Indicators

Markets travel in cycles. Thus we must constantly be on the lookout for changes in the direction of the trend. Looking at market sentiment and the overbought/sold conditions can provide "early warning signs" that a trend change may be near.

Trend and Breadth Confirmation Indicator (Short-Term) Explained: History shows the most reliable market moves tend to occur when the breadth indices are in gear with the major market averages. When the breadth measures diverge, investors should take note that a trend reversal may be at hand. This indicator incorporates an All-Cap Dollar Weighted Equity Series and A/D Line. From 1998, when the A/D line is above its 5-day smoothing and the All-Cap Equal Weighted Equity Series is above its 25-day smoothing, the equity index has gained at a rate of +32.5% per year. When one of the indicators is above its smoothing, the equity index has gained at a rate of +13.3% per year. And when both are below, the equity index has lost +23.6% per year.

Price Thrust Indicator Explained: This indicator measures the 3-day rate of change of the Value Line Composite relative to the standard deviation of the 30-day average. When the Value Line's 3-day rate of change have moved above 0.5 standard deviation of the 30-day average ROC, a "thrust" occurs and since 2000, the Value Line Composite has gained ground at a rate of +20.6% per year. When the indicator is below 0.5 standard deviation of the 30-day, the Value Line has lost ground at a rate of -10.0% per year. And when neutral, the Value Line has gained at a rate of +5.9% per year.

Volume Thrust Indicator Explained: This indicator uses NASDAQ volume data to indicate bullish and bearish conditions for the NASDAQ Composite Index. The indicator plots the ratio of the 10-day total of NASDAQ daily advancing volume (i.e., the total volume traded in stocks which rose in price each day) to the 10-day total of daily declining volume (volume traded in stocks which fell each day). This ratio indicates when advancing stocks are attracting the majority of the volume (readings above 1.0) and when declining stocks are seeing the heaviest trading (readings below 1.0). This indicator thus supports the case that a rising market supported by heavier volume in the advancing issues tends to be the most bullish condition, while a declining market with downside volume dominating confirms bearish conditions. When in a positive mode, the NASDAQ Composite has gained at a rate of +38.3% per year, When neutral, the NASDAQ has gained at a rate of +13.3% per year. And when negative, the NASDAQ has lost at a rate of -8.5% per year.

Breadth Thrust Indicator Explained: This indicator uses the number of NASDAQ-listed stocks advancing and declining to indicate bullish or bearish breadth conditions for the NASDAQ Composite. The indicator plots the ratio of the 10-day total of the number of stocks rising on the NASDAQ each day to the 10-day total of the number of stocks declining each day. Using 10-day totals smooths the random daily fluctuations and gives indications on an intermediate-term basis. As expected, the NASDAQ Composite performs much better when the 10-day A/D ratio is high (strong breadth) and worse when the indicator is in its lower mode (weak breadth). The most bullish conditions for the NASDAQ when the 10-day A/D indicator is not only high, but has recently posted an extreme high reading and thus indicated a thrust of upside momentum. Bearish conditions are confirmed when the indicator is low and has recently signaled a downside breadth thrust. In positive mode, the NASDAQ has gained at a rate of +22.1% per year since 1981. In a neutral mode, the NASDAQ has gained at a rate of +14.5% per year. And when in a negative mode, the NASDAQ has lost at a rate of -6.4% per year.

Bull/Bear Volume Relationship Explained: This indicator plots both "supply" and "demand" volume lines. When the Demand Volume line is above the Supply Volume line, the indicator is bullish. From 1981, the stock market has gained at an average annual rate of +11.7% per year when in a bullish mode. When the Demand Volume line is below the Supply Volume line, the indicator is bearish. When the indicator has been bearish, the market has lost ground at a rate of -6.1% per year.

Technical Health of 100 Industry Groups Explained: Designed to provide a reading on the technical health of the overall market, this indicator takes the technical temperature of more than 100 industry sectors each week. Looking back to early 1980, when the model is rated as "positive," the S&P has averaged returns in excess of 23% per year. When the model carries a "neutral" reading, the S&P has returned over 11% per year. But when the model is rated "negative," stocks fall by more than -13% a year on average.

Weekly State of the Market Model Reading Explained:Different market environments require different investing strategies. To help us identify the current environment, we look to our longer-term State of the Market Model. This model is designed to tell us when risk factors are high, low, or uncertain. In short, this longer-term oriented, weekly model tells us whether the odds favor the bulls, bears, or neither team.

Disclosures

The opinions and forecasts expressed herein are those of Mr. David Moenning and may not actually come to pass. Mr. Moenning's opinions and viewpoints regarding the future of the markets should not be construed as recommendations. The analysis and information in this report is for informational purposes only. No part of the material presented in this report is intended as an investment recommendation or investment advice. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed nor any Portfolio constitutes a solicitation to purchase or sell securities or any investment program.

Any investment decisions must in all cases be made by the reader or by his or her investment adviser. Do NOT ever purchase any security without doing sufficient research. There is no guarantee that the investment objectives outlined will actually come to pass. All opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Neither the editor, employees, nor any of their affiliates shall have any liability for any loss sustained by anyone who has relied on the information provided.

The analysis provided is based on both technical and fundamental research and is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Although the information contained is derived from sources which are believed to be reliable, they cannot be guaranteed.

David D. Moenning, an advisor representative of CONCERT Wealth Management Inc. (CONCERT), is founder of Heritage Capital Advisors LLC, a legal business entity doing business as Heritage Capital Research (Heritage). Advisory services are offered through CONCERT Wealth Management, Inc., a registered investment advisor. For a complete description of investment risks, fees and services review the CONCERT firm brochure (ADV Part 2) which is available from your Investment Representative or by contacting Heritage or CONCERT.

Mr. Moenning is also the owner of Heritage Capital Management (HCM) a state-registered investment adviser. HCM also serves as a sub-advisor to other investment advisory firms. Neither HCM, Heritage, or CONCERT is registered as a broker-dealer.

Employees and affiliates of Heritage and HCM may at times have positions in the securities referred to and may make purchases or sales of these securities while publications are in circulation. Editors will indicate whether they or Heritage/HCM has a position in stocks or other securities mentioned in any publication. The disclosures will be accurate as of the time of publication and may change thereafter without notice.

Investments in equities carry an inherent element of risk including the potential for significant loss of principal. Past performance is not an indication of future results.

The question of the day is why the stock market has suddenly fallen out of bed. Three days ago, the S&P 500 was knocking on the door of a new all-time high. Three days ago, the NASDAQ was flirting with its bubble-induced high set some 15 years earlier. And three days ago, the Russell 2000 small-cap and the S&P 400 mid-cap indices were making new all-time highs and looking strong.

But then, seemingly out of the blue and without any obvious trigger, news event, new crisis, or headline, another selloff began. And then yesterday's session turned into an all-out rout to the downside - again without any clear catalyst.

To be sure, the current market has been a herky-jerky affair for some time now. For the past four months, most trends have lasted between 5 and 7 days on average before reversing and heading the other way. Granted, there was the nearly month-long advance seen in February, which, of course, saw a quick reversal at the beginning of March. But the key is to recognize that the S&P 500 has now changed directions 8 times so far in 2015, 11 times in the last four months, and 15 times since the end of July.

What Gives?

There are any number of excuses provided by the popular to explain why the venerable Dow Jones Industrial Average, which now includes the world's largest company, would suddenly fall 300 points. My personal favorite, however is "profit taking," which was used with regularity yesterday. The problem is that this explanation tends to be employed when writers have absolutely no idea why the market just did what it did.

So let's run down the reasons for the decline that were bandied about. First, there is the growing conflict in Yemen. And while this is not front-page news at the moment, fear of a geopolitical event involving Saudi Arabia could certainly cause a certain segment of the trading population to head for cover.

Next, although nobody wanted to say it out loud, concerns about the Germanwings plane crash being an act of terrorism have certainly been present. And we know for a fact that traders tend to sell first and ask questions later whenever there is an issue involving the killing of innocent people.

Moving away from the headlines and into the financial arena, the state of the earnings season continues to be an issue for some investors. By now, everybody knows that the strong dollar is going to hit the bottom lines of multinational companies, perhaps hard. The key here is that folks don't know how bad the damage is going to be and as such, this brings some uncertainty into the market.

Next up is the issue of the U.S. economy. If you've been following the data, it has become abundantly clear that with the exception of the jobs reports, most of the economic reports have come in on the punk side so far in 2015. And while you can "blame it on weather" or the port strike in California, the concern is that GDP in Q1 is going to take a hit. But again, no one is exactly sure what that looks like at the present time and then perhaps more importantly, whether or not the slowdown in Q1 represents a trend. So, once again, this brings some uncertainty into the mix.

Speaking of the economy, there is also growing concern about the state of the consumer. Retail sales have been weak for months now and while a good part of the weakness seen here can be attributed to the decline in oil and gasoline, the key takeaway is that the U.S. consumer is not spending the savings generated by the decline in oil prices.

Correlated to the concern about the economy is the decline in interest rates. While the Fed is talking about hiking rates, the yield on the 10-year is once again going the opposite direction as one might expect. And with the 10-year yield now once again below 2%, there is concern that the worries about the economy may be warranted.

Stepping back from the blinking screens and the violent intraday action, there is also a fair amount of fretting on the valuations front. As pointed out in a recent missive, it is hard to argue that stocks are not overvalued on an absolute basis. And with some big-name investors having issued warnings on the subject, it is a safe bet that this remains a source of selling whenever stocks approach new-highs.

Then there is the idea of selling your winners at the end of the quarter. While this concept really only applies to the fast-money types, there is little doubt that the semis, the biotechs, and some of the consumer discretionary names (think retail) have seen outsized selling of late. You can blame it on hedgies all playing the same "rotation trade" at the same time or call it "profit taking" if you must, but the bottom line is that the proliferation of ETFs makes it easy for traders to hit just about any area of the market they'd like in a short period of time.

Speaking of the fast-money folks, I continue to believe that millisecond trend-following continues to have a huge impact on the market these days. In my humble opinion, it is the growing popularity of trading at speeds unfathomable to the human brain, that is causing the U.S. stock market to see exaggerated moves in both directions on a daily basis.

Do the math here and my point becomes abundantly clear. There are 1,000 milliseconds in a single second. There are 60,000 milliseconds in a minute. There are 3.6 million milliseconds in an hour. And thus, there are 23.4 million millisecond tick bars available to high-speed trend following algorithms each and every trading day.

This means that there is no need for these high-speed trend followers to hold positions overnight. Nope, each and every day brings the ample opportunity to jump in and out of the market at the speed of light. And so, when a strong trend develops in the market - with or without a reason - the trend-following algos simply chase each other higher/lower, exaggerating the move along the way.

So there you have it. While none of the above is really worthy of a 300-point decline on the Dow, the combination of issues just might be. And while I continue to believe that the high-speed trading is contributing to the outsized moves, the bottom line is that this volatile environment is showing no signs of letting up.

Thought For The Day:

To think is easy. To act is hard. But the hardest thing in the world is to act in accordance with your thinking. - Johann von Goethe

Current Market Drivers

We strive to identify the driving forces behind the market action on a daily basis. The thinking is that if we can both identify and understand why stocks are doing what they are doing on a short-term basis; we are not likely to be surprised/blind-sided by a big move. Listed below are what we believe to be the driving forces of the current market (Listed in order of importance).

1. The State of Fed/ECB Policy2. The State of the U.S. Economy3. The State of the U.S. Dollar4. The State of the Earnings Season

The State of the Trend

We believe it is important to analyze the market using multiple time-frames. We define short-term as 3 days to 3 weeks, intermediate-term as 3 weeks to 3 months, and long-term as 3 months or more. Below are our current ratings of the three primary trends:

Traders as well as computerized algorithms are generally keenly aware of the important technical levels on the charts from a short-term basis. Below are the levels we deem important to watch today:

Key Near-Term Support Zone(s) for S&P 500: 2040

Key Near-Term Resistance Zone(s): 2120

The State of the Tape

Momentum indicators are designed to tell us about the technical health of a trend - I.E. if there is any "oomph" behind the move. Below are a handful of our favorite indicators relating to the market's "mo"...

Trend and Breadth Confirmation Indicator (Short-Term): Neutral

Price Thrust Indicator: Neutral

Volume Thrust Indicator: Neutral

Breadth Thrust Indicator: Neutral

Bull/Bear Volume Relationship: Positive

Technical Health of 100+ Industry Groups: Moderately Positive

The Early Warning Indicators

Markets travel in cycles. Thus we must constantly be on the lookout for changes in the direction of the trend. Looking at market sentiment and the overbought/sold conditions can provide "early warning signs" that a trend change may be near.

Trend and Breadth Confirmation Indicator (Short-Term) Explained: History shows the most reliable market moves tend to occur when the breadth indices are in gear with the major market averages. When the breadth measures diverge, investors should take note that a trend reversal may be at hand. This indicator incorporates an All-Cap Dollar Weighted Equity Series and A/D Line. From 1998, when the A/D line is above its 5-day smoothing and the All-Cap Equal Weighted Equity Series is above its 25-day smoothing, the equity index has gained at a rate of +32.5% per year. When one of the indicators is above its smoothing, the equity index has gained at a rate of +13.3% per year. And when both are below, the equity index has lost +23.6% per year.

Price Thrust Indicator Explained: This indicator measures the 3-day rate of change of the Value Line Composite relative to the standard deviation of the 30-day average. When the Value Line's 3-day rate of change have moved above 0.5 standard deviation of the 30-day average ROC, a "thrust" occurs and since 2000, the Value Line Composite has gained ground at a rate of +20.6% per year. When the indicator is below 0.5 standard deviation of the 30-day, the Value Line has lost ground at a rate of -10.0% per year. And when neutral, the Value Line has gained at a rate of +5.9% per year.

Volume Thrust Indicator Explained: This indicator uses NASDAQ volume data to indicate bullish and bearish conditions for the NASDAQ Composite Index. The indicator plots the ratio of the 10-day total of NASDAQ daily advancing volume (i.e., the total volume traded in stocks which rose in price each day) to the 10-day total of daily declining volume (volume traded in stocks which fell each day). This ratio indicates when advancing stocks are attracting the majority of the volume (readings above 1.0) and when declining stocks are seeing the heaviest trading (readings below 1.0). This indicator thus supports the case that a rising market supported by heavier volume in the advancing issues tends to be the most bullish condition, while a declining market with downside volume dominating confirms bearish conditions. When in a positive mode, the NASDAQ Composite has gained at a rate of +38.3% per year, When neutral, the NASDAQ has gained at a rate of +13.3% per year. And when negative, the NASDAQ has lost at a rate of -8.5% per year.

Breadth Thrust Indicator Explained: This indicator uses the number of NASDAQ-listed stocks advancing and declining to indicate bullish or bearish breadth conditions for the NASDAQ Composite. The indicator plots the ratio of the 10-day total of the number of stocks rising on the NASDAQ each day to the 10-day total of the number of stocks declining each day. Using 10-day totals smooths the random daily fluctuations and gives indications on an intermediate-term basis. As expected, the NASDAQ Composite performs much better when the 10-day A/D ratio is high (strong breadth) and worse when the indicator is in its lower mode (weak breadth). The most bullish conditions for the NASDAQ when the 10-day A/D indicator is not only high, but has recently posted an extreme high reading and thus indicated a thrust of upside momentum. Bearish conditions are confirmed when the indicator is low and has recently signaled a downside breadth thrust. In positive mode, the NASDAQ has gained at a rate of +22.1% per year since 1981. In a neutral mode, the NASDAQ has gained at a rate of +14.5% per year. And when in a negative mode, the NASDAQ has lost at a rate of -6.4% per year.

Bull/Bear Volume Relationship Explained: This indicator plots both "supply" and "demand" volume lines. When the Demand Volume line is above the Supply Volume line, the indicator is bullish. From 1981, the stock market has gained at an average annual rate of +11.7% per year when in a bullish mode. When the Demand Volume line is below the Supply Volume line, the indicator is bearish. When the indicator has been bearish, the market has lost ground at a rate of -6.1% per year.

Technical Health of 100 Industry Groups Explained: Designed to provide a reading on the technical health of the overall market, this indicator takes the technical temperature of more than 100 industry sectors each week. Looking back to early 1980, when the model is rated as "positive," the S&P has averaged returns in excess of 23% per year. When the model carries a "neutral" reading, the S&P has returned over 11% per year. But when the model is rated "negative," stocks fall by more than -13% a year on average.

Weekly State of the Market Model Reading Explained:Different market environments require different investing strategies. To help us identify the current environment, we look to our longer-term State of the Market Model. This model is designed to tell us when risk factors are high, low, or uncertain. In short, this longer-term oriented, weekly model tells us whether the odds favor the bulls, bears, or neither team.

Disclosures

The opinions and forecasts expressed herein are those of Mr. David Moenning and may not actually come to pass. Mr. Moenning's opinions and viewpoints regarding the future of the markets should not be construed as recommendations. The analysis and information in this report is for informational purposes only. No part of the material presented in this report is intended as an investment recommendation or investment advice. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed nor any Portfolio constitutes a solicitation to purchase or sell securities or any investment program.

Any investment decisions must in all cases be made by the reader or by his or her investment adviser. Do NOT ever purchase any security without doing sufficient research. There is no guarantee that the investment objectives outlined will actually come to pass. All opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Neither the editor, employees, nor any of their affiliates shall have any liability for any loss sustained by anyone who has relied on the information provided.

The analysis provided is based on both technical and fundamental research and is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Although the information contained is derived from sources which are believed to be reliable, they cannot be guaranteed.

David D. Moenning, an advisor representative of CONCERT Wealth Management Inc. (CONCERT), is founder of Heritage Capital Advisors LLC, a legal business entity doing business as Heritage Capital Research (Heritage). Advisory services are offered through CONCERT Wealth Management, Inc., a registered investment advisor. For a complete description of investment risks, fees and services review the CONCERT firm brochure (ADV Part 2) which is available from your Investment Representative or by contacting Heritage or CONCERT.

Mr. Moenning is also the owner of Heritage Capital Management (HCM) a state-registered investment adviser. HCM also serves as a sub-advisor to other investment advisory firms. Neither HCM, Heritage, or CONCERT is registered as a broker-dealer.

Employees and affiliates of Heritage and HCM may at times have positions in the securities referred to and may make purchases or sales of these securities while publications are in circulation. Editors will indicate whether they or Heritage/HCM has a position in stocks or other securities mentioned in any publication. The disclosures will be accurate as of the time of publication and may change thereafter without notice.

Investments in equities carry an inherent element of risk including the potential for significant loss of principal. Past performance is not an indication of future results.

Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.