The Evolution of the Creation Controversy in Twentieth Century America "The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an improved theory, is it then a science or faith?" Charles Darwin

IntroductionQuestions on the origin of life and of the universe must have permeated human thought since the very beginning of the thought process itself. Philosophers, natural scientists, and theologians have long historical records of dealing with the explanations of mankind's origin, function, purpose, and ultimate destiny1. In a seemingly never-ending process of debate and debunk, the scientific community has clung fast to evolutionary theory as a matter of proven fact. Those opposing this view have, over the course of the twentieth century, morphed the creationistic view into something more, along the way gaining the support of a small portion of the scientific community. In the process, Americans have found themselves being tested along both logical and value based beliefs. This paper will not so much discuss the scientific approach to the controversy. The arguments defending evolution are well documented. What will be discussed is the change in the presentation of creationism to a more scientific theory which is, though still hotly debated, gaining the support of some of science's elite, and what has brought it to this new level of examination and criticism. In order to understand the recent change in the letter of creationism law, it is necessary to first explain, briefly, the difference between creationism and evolution. In Darwinian terms, evolution refers to changes accumulated by natural selection in living things, especially regarding species formation. Darwin's theory is based on the fact that natural selection is the cause of evolution5. The action of natural selection, operating over a long period of time, would cause a species to become better adapted to its environment and hence change10. Darwin believed that the environment was slowly changing and as a species modified to this change it eventually became a new species - the alternative was extinction. Some of these variations increase an individual's chance of survival and hence leave more offspring. Since their offspring inherit most of their parents' features, they too have an increased chance of survival. The evolutionists say is that all living things have arisen by naturalistic, mechanistic process from a single primeval all, which in turn had arisen by similar processes from a dead inanimate world - many hundreds of millions of year's ago5. The creationists refer to the theory that the universe and all life forms came into existence by the direct creative acts of a Creator external to and independent of the natural universe which accounted for all of life's processes. The creation/evolution controversy centers on five main issues2: 1.the origin of the universe was divinely created, or has it always existed, or did it come into existence without any supernatural causes; 2.the age of the universe and of the earth - thousands or billions of years old; 3.origin of life - created out of nothing, or from chemical processes; 4.biological evolution - modification of species;

5.human origins - evolve from other life-forms or distinctly created. Scientists deal with the "what" and "how" of origins, where as the religious creationists deal with "who" and "why". If a scientist discovers a natural phenomenon that contradicts the literal interpretation of the Bible, fundamental creationists have long insisted that they are wrong1. A Brief History

Before Charles Darwin's publication of Origin of Species in 1859, biologists based their science on theological assumptions. Science was rooted in religion and its purpose was to prove the existence of God using as...

YOU MAY ALSO FIND THESE DOCUMENTS HELPFUL

...The theory of evolution through natural selection describes how humans and other animals have evolved over a long period of time. Charles Darwin made a hypothesis based on the different pictures of the same animal that were found over the years. There was a slight change in its features, which brought him to the conclusion of how animals adapt over time. His theory began to gather more evidence when discovering fossilized “ape-like” bone structures, which gives great data to his...

...Materialism: Pure Science
IntelligentDesign: Theology in disguise
Expelled: The Movie
Lynette L. Davidson
Anthropology 354 Essay 2
March 16, 2013
Words: 1683
Style: APA
Materialism: Pure Science
The concept materialism as described by the authors of the book Critique of IntelligentDesign is “the view that the world is explained in terms of itself…not by invocation of the super natural.”(Foster et al. 2008, p. 19) The idea...

...Austin Simandl
Heather McFall
English 151
May 29, 2009
Public education: Teaching Evolution, Creationism, and IntelligentDesign
As a high school student I attended Indian Hill in Cincinnati, Ohio. Sitting in my fourth period class on yet another boring day of high school I couldn’t help but notice my science teacher acting a little peculiar. My teacher was teaching the subject of evolution to a diverse class. It is like he became...

...Should IntelligentDesign be Taught Alongside Evolution
A trial is currently taking place in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania concerning the question of whether a local school district can require students to be told about intelligentdesign (ID) as an alternative to Darwinian evolution (Holden 1796). This trial, known as Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, could result in the setting of a national...

...Species,” the scientific community remains convinced about evolution—not only on the basis of the evidence he cited, but also based on evidence from sources he could not have dreamed of. But he would not be happy to learn that almost half of the American population do not accept evolution. Moreover, he would be downright dismayed to know that a group of creationists has devised a minimalist form of Creationism—dubbed "Intelligent...

...explain our world through the scientific method, Darwin's theory of evolution and many years of research.
So this sets up for the debate of all debates, who are we and were did we come from? On one side we have IntelligentDesign, or I.D. which claims that something in nature are simply too complex to happen by chance. In their view there is a higher being (God) who us being it all. On the other side of the debate we have evolution,...

...Darshane Hines
Biology 211
Dr. Peters
What other regions of the country have had attempts to include IntelligentDesign into their science curricula? Where have ID proponents been successful in incorporating this viewpoint into public science classes?
The theory of intelligentdesign argues that some features of the universe are best explained as the products of an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as...

...Should IntelligentDesign be taught alongside Evolution in public schools?
For many years, there has been a debate on whether intelligentdesign should be taught alongside evolution in public school systems. Fundamentalists and progressives constantly argue that intelligentdesign should or should not be taught based on their personal bias. Intelligent...