You seem to be engaged in a POV effort. Geographically, the country of Iraq is not the same as Mesopotamia. The Tigris-Euphrates river basin includes significant parts of modern Iran, Syria, and Turkey. While Iraq is certainly the major portion of Mesopotamia, it is not equivalent. Also, the archaeological evidence indicates that agriculture arose in China, India, Mesopotamia, the Levant, and Egypt close enough in time (8th millennium BCE) that determining which is first is simply not possible. The oldest known settlements were pre-agricultural ones of the Natufian culture in the Levant, not Mesopotamia. — Carolina wrendiscussió 20:55, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Please, do not mix Mesopotamia with Iraq, a geographical region with a modern country. They are not synonymous. --Vahagn Petrosyan 13:49, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

There is no policy that you are allowed to remove information from here, nor is there a policy that says I'm allowed to stop you. So we reach an impasse. It is useful for everyone to see what has been said here previously so that they know at what level to pitch their comments. Trying to hide comments (even if it's for benign reasons) can come across as an attempt to deliberately mislead, it is much more common to "Archive" the information to subpages. Conrad.Irwin 01:48, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

If you have edited Wikipedia, you probably already know some basics, but Wiktionary does have a few conventions of its own. Please take a moment to learn our basics before jumping in.

First, all articles should be in our standard format, even if they are not yet complete. Please take a moment to familiarize yourself with it. You can use one of our pre-defined article templates by typing the name of a non-existent article into the search box and hitting 'Go'. You can link Wikipedia pages, including your user page, using [[w:pagename]], {{pedia}}, or {{wikipedia}}.

Notice that article titles are case-sensitive and are not capitalized unless, like proper nouns, they are ordinarily capitalized (Poland or January). Also, take a moment to familiarize yourself with our criteria for inclusion, since Wiktionary is not an encyclopedia. Don't go looking for a Village pump – we have a Beer parlour. Note that while Wikipedia likes redirects, Wiktionary deletes most redirects (especially spelling variations), in favor of short entries. Please do not copy entries here from Wikipedia if they are in wikipedia:Category:Copy to Wiktionary; they are moved by bot, and will appear presently in the Transwiki: namespace.

A further major caveat is that a "Citation" on Wiktionary is synonymous with a "Quotation", we use these primary sources to construct dictionary definitions from evidence of the word being used. "References" (aka "Citations" on Wikipedia) are used predominantly for verifying Etymologies and usage notes, not the definitions themselves. This is partly to avoid copyright violation, and partly to ensure that we don't fall into the trap of adding "list words", or words that while often defined are never used in practice.

Note for experienced Wikipedians:

Wiktionary is run in a very different manner from Wikipedia and you will have a better experience if you do not assume the two are similar in culture. Please remember that despite your experience on Wikipedia, that experience may not always be applicable here. While you do not need to be an expert, or anything close to one, to contribute, please be as respectful of local policies and community practices as you can. Be aware that well-meaning Wikipedians have unfortunately found themselves blocked in the past for perceived disruption due to misunderstandings. To prevent a similar outcome, remember the maxim: be bold, but don't be reckless!

Having said that, we welcome Wikipedians, who have useful skills and experience to offer. The following are a couple of the most jarring differences between our projects that Wikipedians may want to learn up front, so things go smoothly for everyone. Changing policy pages on Wiktionary is very strongly discouraged. If you think something needs changing, please discuss it at the beer parlour, after which we may formally vote on the issue. You should also note that Wiktionary has very different user-space policies, we are here to build a dictionary and your user-page exists only to facilitate that. In particular we have voted to explicitly ban all userboxes with the exception of {{Babel}}; please do not create or use them.

We hope you enjoy editing Wiktionary and being a Wiktionarian. Conrad.Irwin 01:48, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

I have reverted what you have blanked in this talk page. The past discussion on your talk page is actually relevant: you are repeatedly pushing some POV on the Mesopotamia entry, as your edit history shows, and the admins should it have easy to see whether a discussion on "Mesopotamia" has already taken place on your talk page. --Dan Polansky 20:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

If you persist in wasting everyone's time you will be blocked. Conrad.Irwin 22:39, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Izzedine, your quotation is not wholly accurate; the Wiktionary:Namespace page actually says "It is strongly discouraged to delete content from someone else's user talk page. Nor is it acceptable to modify or create sub-pages of other user's talk pages." I have not deleted content from someone else's user talk page; I have only restored relevant content. The second quoted sentence is not wholly comprehensible to me, although I estimate that is says that (a) people should not modify other user's talk pages and (b) people should not create subpages in other people's talk pages.

But it is of course in fact acceptable to modify a user's talk page, as that is what I do whenever I post a comment. I should avoid modifying other user's comments, as is recommended elsewhere. And I should avoid making arbitrary modifications, such as adding arbitrary text and images at the top or in the middle of the talk page.

The page that you are quoting--Wiktionary:Namespace--does not have a policy status; it has never been voted on, and does not have a little box at the top that indicates that it is a policy, unlike, say, WT:CFI. What you are quoting as a policy has been pseudo-enacted by a single person in this series of edits back in 2005.

Most importantly, I have not damaged your talk page; I have restored it so that it is possible for admins to see the discussion history. --Dan Polansky 08:54, 18 January 2010 (UTC)