Cyclists. Theyâ€™re nothing but a bunch of Green-voting, latte-sipping, inner-city trendoids with an over-developed sense of entitlement.

Thatâ€™s what youâ€™d think if you believed much of the media coverage given to cycling in the past few years. From shock jocks to tabloid TV shows to newspaper columnists, there's always someone ready to have a go at cyclists.

Especially media organisations that favour the conservative side of politics.

Advertisement: Story continues below This vilification is curious, given that Australia is a nation of bicycle buyers. Last year, we bought more cycles than cars â€“ something thatâ€™s happened every year this century. Of course, a lot of those would be kidsâ€™ bikes â€¦ but the increasing numbers of riders on the roads and the proliferation of cycling shops should tell you that cycling is, well, on a roll.

So, if we are all buying bikes â€“ more than a million sold every year, in a country with a population of 22 million â€“ surely an acceptance, if not necessarily a love, of cycling should pervade the political spectrum?

And yet, cycling continues to be targeted by many conservatives as an identifying mark of the loony left. The anti-fun brigade. The sandal-wearers. The people hell-bent on making you feel like you should be living in a cave, wearing a hemp smock, eating something vegan and lentilly.

This is especially true of Sydney, with its ongoing conflict over cycleways. The CBDâ€™s narrow, bike-unfriendly streets are slowly gaining a criss-cross of lanes that serve as safe conduits for cycle commuters into the city. Or, as 2GB talkback presenter Alan Jones describes it, â€œthe biggest disgrace in traffic management that I have ever seenâ€.

Jones was having a go at Sydneyâ€™s Lord Mayor, Clover Moore, the bike lanesâ€™ driving force (or should that be peddler?). The â€œvelo vilificationâ€ continues in tabloids that slap an â€œon your bike, Cloverâ€ headline onto any story that concerns her. See â€¦ sheâ€™s into cycling. Bloody leftie. Sheâ€™s got to go.

Moore is an independent, and the new Liberal state government would also dearly love to wheel her into obscurity. Just weeks after taking on his role as Roads Minister, and before heâ€™d had a proper briefing by Moore, Duncan Gay was saying that if cyclists didnâ€™t use the lanes, theyâ€™d lose them. He later denied suggesting heâ€™d rip them up, but said: â€œI believe that some are in the wrong place â€¦ and should be moved.â€

Never mind the massive added cost, or the question of where they would be moved to â€¦ you can almost hear the voters saying: â€œWell, the roads are more jammed with cars than ever before, but at least he got rid of those cycleways!â€

So, are there conservatives who are in favour of cycling? One favourite global example springs to mind: Boris Johnson, the Lord Mayor of London. Dyed-in-the-wool Conservative, Eton and Oxford educated, and a fanatical cycle commuter who brought a shared-bicycle scheme to London â€“ the so-called â€œBoris Bikesâ€.

The plan was initiated by the former Labour mayor, â€œRed Kenâ€ Livingston, but did Johnson do the usual thing and ditch it when he came into office? On the contrary. A visit to YouTube will show clips of Boris riding the bike that bears his nickname. He also called for a law change that would allow cyclists to make left turns at red lights, in order to free up traffic flows. Legal light jumping for bikes â€“ how red is that!

What about Australia? Well, it seems some conservative city fathers can sway onto the bike path. In Melbourne, Liberal Lord Mayor Robert Doyle promised to return cars to Swanston Street but instead found himself on a road to Damascus. But from the howls of outrage in some quarters over plans to improve bicycle access to the busy thoroughfare, it seems as if a backflip is worse when itâ€™s also a backpedal. In Brisbane, Lord Mayor Graham Quirk of the LNP yesterday announced plans to have a bicycle lane running the length of George Street in the CBD. Both cities have small and, sadly, struggling bike share schemes.

And nationally? Well, there's Opposition Leader Tony Abbott, whoâ€™s out on his bike at crack of dawn every day, training for his next triathlon or Pollie Pedal.

Snag is (and Iâ€™d love to be proved wrong on this), Iâ€™m not sure Abbott the champion cyclist has said anything to champion cycling since he took the top job.

Maybe he's decided there's no votes in it. Or maybe heâ€™s worried that Clover Moore will then invite him for a trundle up the Bourke Street cycleway with her - on a bicycle made for two.

Iâ€™d give up lentils and lattes for a month to see that.

Is our attitude to cycling in Australia coloured by our political persuasion? And why is cycling seen by so many as the preserve of the lefties? Have your say.

After wearing out his knees with basketball and running, Michael O'Reilly became yet another Mamil (Middle-Aged Man In Lycra).

Good point about Tony Abbot. We've tried repeatedly to contact him but we always get the standard Auto reply of 'we care but he's a buysy man etc". He seems happy to ride a bike for Presser's, but he seems very reluctant to use his position to do anything for cyclists. Bastard.

A big driver (pun intended) in cycling politics is that I simply cannot ride from home to destination without feeling my life is at risk. If riders felt safe, there wouldn't be much in the way of bike politics

What a nice article to read while cooking steak, drinking milo and laughing at dumb people with smart phones.

And yet, cycling continues to be targeted by many conservatives as an identifying mark of the loony left. The anti-fun brigade. The sandal-wearers. The people hell-bent on making you feel like you should be living in a cave, wearing a hemp smock, eating something vegan and lentilly.