White House Insider Fears For America Under Obama

An anonymous White House insider, whom Fellowship of the Minds has named DeepThroat2 (DT2), has been talking to Ulsterman of News Flavor about behind-the-scenes turmoil in The Fraud’s administration. Here’s the latest scoop:

Democrats’ internal polls show a coming debacle next Tuesday, with losses for the Dems greater even than in 1994.

Obama continues to be inattentive to his job, instead spending all his time and energy campaigning because he loves the adulation from the duped crowd.

At a White House meeting on the Afghanistan war, with generals present, Obama spent only 10 minutes and laughed inappropriately.

Democrats are in open rebellion. DT2, for one, is adamant that he will not vote to reëlect Obama in 2012.

Things are so bad, DT2 not just fears for his party (Democrat), he fears for America.

Below are excerpts of what DT2 said, harvested from “White House Insider: ‘They were in shock at the president’s behavior’,” by Ulsterman, NewsFlavor.com, October 25, 2010:On the November 2 midterm elections:“I have been given access to a significant amount of internals all across the country. Senate, House, and governor races, and…well, it is going to be a very tough night for the Democratic Party. It is as bad as I and some others feared it would be for us a couple months ago. Nothing has improved – maybe a few races here and there have tightened, but overall, it’s looking very bad for us. Actually worse than the national polling data currently suggests even.
[Democrats will lose in the House] At least 50 – possibly a bit more. It will be worse than what we saw in 1994, and I was around for that ass-kicking.
[The Senate] is just a bit tougher to call. I think the Republicans right now have a 50/50 chance of taking a very slim majority. But at the very least, they are going to gain seven seats, which will basically shut down any sure-thing Democratic Party agenda in the Senate. We don’t fear that as much as what is going on with the House. It is going to be very difficult working with the House – the Republicans are taking on an increasingly aggressive tone heading into the election, and I think in 2011, they are going to putting on an all out offensive against the Obama agenda.”Obama is to blame:“President Obama and his administration -without a doubt. The Obama White House has been a political train wreck from day one, and it isn’t getting any better at the moment.”Obama’s shocking behavior:“I’ll give you an example of why President Obama is not right for America. He sure as hell has not been right for the party. Not long ago, the president took a meeting. He’s late, which apparently is becoming more and more common with him. The meeting was almost cancelled. In strolls the president, joking with an aide. He plops down on a sofa, leans over and claps another guy on the back asking how he’s been. Apologizes for being late, says he was “held up”. He laughs some more. The meeting begins. After just ten minutes, during which time the president appears to almost totally withdraw into himself, an aide walks in and whispers something to the president, who then nods and quickly stands up, shakes a few hands and tells another aide to update him later on the rest of the meeting. As the president is walking out he is laughing at something yet again. He asked no questions of those at the meeting – not one. He left after just ten minutes, coming in laughing and leaving laughing. His behavior during that brief time he was there was described as “borderline manic”.That meeting was an update on Afghanistan, and the President of the United States, the Commander in Chief, could give a -expletive-.
[White House aides] were also left to apologize to the ones left in the room after the president left. Some of these were military. They were not happy. No…that is not accurate. They were pissed. They didn’t say much at the time, but word got back. They were in shock at the president’s behavior. The country had just lost a number of soldiers the week prior, the public opinion on the war was falling…and the president didn’t seem to care. He arrives late, leaves early, appears to emotionally shut down during the actual discussion, and to then start laughing once again as he is leaving…how does someone reconcile with that kind of behavior? I can’t. It turns my stomach. I didn’t want to believe what I was being told, but I had seen similar kinds of behavior from the president myself, and I can’t dispute the credibility of the source. They have no reason to lie.”DT2 fears for America:“Working with a president is an extraordinary and terrifying thing. In regards to my experience with Obama, it became far less extraordinary and far more terrifying. And it’s getting worse.Yes, terrifying. To see one’s expectations so disappointed. To see a figure who wields such great power and influence fall so short of the responsibilities of that power and influence…that is terrifying to witness. Initially I developed great fear for my party – for the Democrats whose political careers were being destroyed by this administration and party leadership. Now I sincerely fear for my country.”Obama may get reëlected in 2012:“Absolutely. He remains an effective campaigner – the best in politics, and these days, that can be enough to get elected. You don’t actually have to know what you are doing – you just have to look and sound like you know what you are doing.”DT2 will not support Obama in 2012:“I will not support Barack Obama in 2012. That possibility has left the table for me. Based on what I know, what I have been told, what I have seen in recent weeks…no, I cannot support the President for a second term. My concern for the party, for the country…my conscience does not allow me that option any longer. Obama is not fit to be president. He simply does not possess the inclinations necessary to lead the country. And I don’t like saying that. I helped the man get elected. I was in the trenches day after day from city to city helping things get done in 2008…I take no pleasure in saying I was a part of that. And I take no pleasure in saying Obama should not be re-elected in 2012.”“If Barack Obama is the Democratic Party nominee, I will not participate in any way in his election. It will be the first time in some 20 years that I will have removed myself totally from the process of helping elect the Democratic Party candidate for President.I do not know if the country can survive another four years of Barack Obama, and frankly, I want nothing to do with helping us find out. The man is an incompetent. The man is a tool of the extreme far left that has utterly corrupted the Democratic Party. The man and those now closest to him in the administration appear to abhor America’s history. They detest anyone who does not fully subscribe to their positions. They are corrupt, they are increasingly paranoid, and they are taking this country down a path by which we may never recover.Enough is enough. I will not defend, I will not support, I will not play a part in such blatant misuse of power and authority that continues to be the practice of this administration. No more. My primary goal now is to help as many good Democrats survive the disaster that will be the November elections, and from there, provide a far more capable and competent candidate to be the Democratic Party nominee for 2012.I’m not alone. There are more and more of us within the Democratic Party who are ready to challenge this president.”
Part 2 of this report tomorrow! HERE!~Eowyn

Leave a Reply

This comment form is under antispam protection

This comment form is under antispam protection

Subscribe

Notify of

Guest

Joseph E Fasciani

The Obamamama is sounding more and more as Hitler did in his last months. At that time, Hitler was receiving injections of the amphetamines developed by German pharma. We have good records of what his advisors –civil and military– saw and heard of him during this period, and I can assure you they read so closely as to be interchangeable w/the Obamamama. If you don’t believe me, go over the historical record. A very sorry state for the country, but one that has happened before [e.g., when Wilson was terminally ill, and his wife and ‘Col.’ House ran the country]… Read more »

Vote Up0Vote Down Reply

8 years ago

Guest

Katherine Magdangal is on FB

This comes as no surprise to me……at Chicago U. Law he disgusted his colleagues who called him “arrogant and unprepared”) His campaign team called him a “professor” …actually he was only a lecturer and he was supposed to be discussing constitutional law….instead there is a photo of him at a chalkboard- teaching Alinsky’s “rules for radicals”

Wow, that is some scary stuff. It does sound kind of like the actions of a crazy dictator, I hate to go there in describing my president, but damn.
I just don’t see what DT2 thinks democrats are gonna do, run someone against the incumbent president? I know there has been talk about Hillary again, but seriously? Does anyone actually believe the Soros party would allow the Soros stooge to be challenged for the Democrat nominee?

Vote Up0Vote Down Reply

8 years ago

Guest

DCG

Well I fear for us as well…after all he did call half the population of the US “enemies”! This manchild is in waaaay over his head.

Vote Up0Vote Down Reply

8 years ago

Guest

Pattie

BO is destroying this nation, one bill at a time..the dems/libs are destroying it right along with him…it is the voters that will once again vote for them…very dangerous ppl..

This HAS to get out to everyone. I do believe we could be in trouble if the elections don’t change control. We still could be in trouble if the GOB (Good Old Boys) of the GOP ignore the Constitution and operate as they have been (Themselves first, their financiers second and the good of the country third).

Hi, Sam, I am as interested in authenticity and truth as you are. So, here’s my response to your post: You wrote: “The Ulsterman articles are fakes. Read all about it here: https://www.tcdailyplanet.net/news/2010/11/20/triond-and-lie-machine“ I did read the article, written by a “Sam Gelfand,” but he gives no evidence that Ulsterman is a fake. It is merely Gelfand’s speculation. You wrote: “Also, Ulsterman is really a guy named Anthony G. Martin, you can read an article of his here: https://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/informant-leaks-dhs-assault-on-free-speech-free-press“ I’m both aware of and have read Anthony Martin. You’ve merely asserted Martin is Ulsterman; you’ve provided zero evidence or even… Read more »

Vote Up0Vote Down Reply

8 years ago

Guest

Sam

First, thank you for the reply and I appreciate the dialogue. I’ve addressed this issue a few places and a few people have ignored me/deleted my comments while others (such as the people at Free Republic) have facilitated my research. So let’s start with what we do know: Newsflavor is not credible. I signed up for Triond and found that everybody there lies to try to make a quick buck. I just submitted this article about Tom Delay, it’s completely made up: https://newsflavor.com/politics/world-politics/tom-delay-convicted-on-money-laundering-charges/ But they printed it. They have no credibility. So we know that you can fabricate a story… Read more »

Thank you, Sam, for giving us evidence instead of speculation. The Flickr image of Anthony Martin’s Twitter page (https://www.flickr.com/photos/56316558@N05/5208089935/sizes/z/in/photostream/) is most interesting. On November 23, 2010, Martin sent a Twitter to @Robert23Hershey: “there is one from yesterday. I didn’t do an Ulsterman story today.” And indeed, I checked on the NewsFlavor site and can confirm that Ulsterman did not post on November 23. But then, when Martin tweeted “I didn’t do an Ulsterman story today,” how do we know he meant “I didn’t do a story as Ulsterman today”? The sentence can just as well be understood to mean “I… Read more »

Vote Up0Vote Down Reply

8 years ago

Guest

Sam

Well, in the last few days, Mr. Martin has been going through all of his articles to delete all of my comments in which I accused him of being Ulsterman. At one point, he wrote that I was a shill for Obama, and I replied “There is nothing on the internet written by me that even addresses the subject of President Obama.” And he deleted that. In my mind, his actions should prove his guilt to you and anybody else following his articles. If he had nothing to hide, why would he go through all of his articles deleting my… Read more »

Sam, I’m not saying that I don’t believe you. I’m sure you’re telling the truth as you see it. You simply haven’t given me sufficient or compelling evidence to think that: (a) Ulsterman is really Anthony Martin; and (b) Assuming U is really AM, that this necessarily means “White House insider” is a fabrication. (a) and (b) are not mutually exclusive propositions. I can think of at least one reason why Martin would adopt a pseudonym to post White House insider’s leaks. Look at what happened to the 3 gay black men in Chicago whom Obama had known — all… Read more »

Vote Up0Vote Down Reply

8 years ago

Guest

Sam

The reason I didn’t respond to that point is because I don’t want to have a conversation about whether or not the information in the Ulsterman articles is accurate. I’m approaching this as a journalist and it’s very important to me to discern what is and isn’t true… you could go through every claim in the Insider articles and pick them apart and you’d probably get some that are true (Obama certainly isn’t loved by every member of the Democratic party) and some that are false (Obama walking out on a meeting about Afghanistan — that one seems obviously fabricated).… Read more »

Sam,
Your irate and hostile tone is neither necessary nor merited. I did not adopt that tone with you, so I’d sure appreciate it if you don’t. I was merely using my intelligence to examine your claims.
A far better approach to debunk and expose the person who uses the alias Ulsterman is what this brand-new blog is doing: “Ulsterman’s Untruths” https://ulster-man.blogspot.com/. My thanks to commenter Munsterwoman for bringing Ulsterman’s Untruths to my/our attention.

Vote Up0Vote Down Reply

8 years ago

Guest

Sam

This conversation has been over for quite a while, but I just now read your last response which said: “Your irate and hostile tone is neither necessary nor merited.” ??? That’s very strange to me. I wasn’t irate or hostile. I wasn’t even a little bit upset, nor did I intend to communicate otherwise. I find it very odd that you read what I was saying as irate/hostile — in fact, I’m not sure how you interpreted it that way. Anyway, glad to see you’re looking at the evidence and I hope you accept it for what it clearly is.… Read more »