Why Is the FDA Smothering Innovation in Lab Testing?

Recent actions against the trailblazing medical testing company Theranos only protect the status quo, drive up the cost of medicine, and thwart better treatments. Action Alert!
Natural medicine is said to stand on three legs: a natural diet, nutritional supplements, and integrative treatments. But testing is an essential fourth leg.
Some people are seriously deficient in a particular nutrient; others are not. This is one of many reasons why many food and supplement studies that try to assess the effect of nutrition on disease are often flawed. The only way to identify deficiencies is by testing. Yet now the FDA has shut down progress in reducing the cost and effectiveness of these tests.
For the past few weeks, the laboratory-developed testing startup company Theranos has been under close FDA scrutiny for its various testing technologies, and it recently was the subject of an FDA inspection. This inspection resulted in a warning that the company’s blood collection containers were unapproved medical devices. The FDA also told Theranos that it would have to resubmit data for a number of proprietary blood tests they are seeking approval for—that the previously submitted data was insufficient to determine the tests’ accuracy.
Although the FDA does not have the authority to regulate laboratory-developed testing (LDT), Theranos has agreed to comply with all of the FDA’s requests and has also agreed to pause the use of its blood collection containers while the FDA reviews them. This cooperation, however, has not stopped the mainstream media from pouncing.
Back-to-back front-page stories in the Wall Street Journal called into question the accuracy of Theranos’s tests. We suspect the information was leaked by FDA skeptics or by competitors. Other mainstream media outlets seem eager to deflate the enthusiasm over this innovating company: a New York Times headline reads, “The Narrative Frays for Theranos and Elizabeth Holmes”; and the Wall Street Journal writes that “Theranos has struggled behind the scenes to turn excitement over its technology into reality.”
As a result of both the FDA’s assault and the media mudslinging, famous people like Henry Kissinger and George Schultz have left Theranos’s board.
Why would the FDA attack a company that seeks to bring affordable, convenient testing to millions of Americans? We suspect that the agency is doing everything it can to throttle innovators in this area to protect large, established testing companies and hospitals, which have been funding their deficits, in part, by charging exorbitant prices for tests. It’s the old crony game again.
The same sort of attack happened with personal genetic testing company 23andMe. In 2013, the company received warning letters from the FDA to stop its inexpensive “do-it-yourself” genetic testing service for health screening and ancestry purposes, because consumers could be “misled” and harm themselves by “self-treating,” as wedescribe in a companion article in this week’s Pulse.
Let’s keep in mind that LDTs are the future of medicine. There are already new tests to spot cancers long before they manifest themselves otherwise. But these tests are very expensive and neither Medicare nor insurance companies will pay for them. Testing can also help prevent diabetes, heart and blood vessel illness, prostate cancer, and other diseases.
LDTs are not only the future of general medicine—they are also the future of individualized medicine. Integrative doctors use these tests to gather information that aids them in identifying the root causes of their patients’ illnesses— information cannot be gathered and analyzed otherwise.Action Alert! Write to the FDA and tell them to stop harassing Theranos, 23andMe, and other innovators in the LDT field. Please send your message immediately.

3 responses to “Why Is the FDA Smothering Innovation in Lab Testing?”

The technology doesn’t work. It is smoke and mirrors. The FDA is doing the right thing. This company was scrutinized by a few people 2 years ago and said it was smoke and mirrors. There is no conspiracy on this one. Look at the original Board…Colin Powell, George Schultz, Henry Kissinger….do you think these guys know anything about diagnostics?

I haven’t been able to find much information on this company other than that Elizabeth Holmes is one of the worlds youngest billionaires. So she is a shrewd marketer, what does she know about testing? I’m open minded though until I learn more.

Related Articles

Your June 30 article, “Dietary supplements: Manufacturing troubles widespread, FDA inspections show” by Thrine Tsouderos, is a perfect example of the bias and rampant sensationalism we have come to expect from major media when reporting on dietary supplements. (more…)...

Last week we told you about Meleah Corner, who won a major court case in NC allowing her children to continue to be treated with HBOT. This week we had the opportunity to interview her and hear her story in greater detail. You won't believe what she had to go through. (more…)...

Our earliest concern was that free radicals generated by supplemental iron would increase cancer and heart disease risk. Our fears were born out shortly thereafter in published studies showing that elevation in markers of iron intake increased risk (by more than fivefold) of common degenerative dise...

We want to start this edition of Pulse of Health Freedom with our hearty thanks for sending Congress your messages on HR2749, the Waxman–Dingell bill (also known as the Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009, or FSEA), which was the focus of last week’s newsletter. Thousands of messages poured i...

Vitamin D has been called the “buzz” vitamin of 2008. It’s early 2009 and current medical research demonstrating the benefits of optimal vitamin D supplementation is still coming in. Vitamin D has now been found to help diminish age-related mental decline, and vitamin D deficiency is linked to...

A growing number of Americans are concerned about the safety of household cleaners, laundry detergents, and other home care products. For some, their family's health has been damaged by chemicals found in mainstream products. Others have studied the issue and want to protect themselves and those the...

…this time it’s a thirty-year-old law in Kansas. State-based action alerts!
A federal court in Kansas has ruled that the state’s “ag-gag” law is unconstitutional. The tide is indeed turning against these terrible laws, but there are still states where this legislation needs to be remove...

First NameLast NamePhone NumberE-mail Address
Please leave this field empty

Any medical information contained in this site is for informational use only. It is not for use in self-diagnosis or treatment. Please consult with a qualified physician concerning the prudence of and before undertaking any change in diet, treatment for disease, use of any drug, or cessation in use of any prescribed drug.