P1. WW3 has already been lost! Lost not by US but by those who profited from it! And it did not end in THE END. Russia is afraid of losing its ability to play one side against the other in the ME. Israel has made it clear to Putin that it cannot afford the Status Quo any longer ( it is causing too much internal and international damage ). Russia depends on Israel's good will! Yes! Surprised? It's simple: Russia needs Israel's approval to sell stuff to the EU. The EU is sick & tired of the serious negative economic impact of a Status Quo ME.

P2. The EU wants Russia to stop supporting the Iranian Regime and its proxies. The majority of the OPEC nations...meaning: the Arab Gulf States, Saudi Arabia, etc., are fed up with the Status Quo, because it is harming their longterm economic interests. And they also are sick & tired of the Extreme Shia Iranian Regime's threat & harm to Sunnis. The Chinese want World Peace badly: their economy is about to implode, UNLESS Peace Prevails in the ME & elsewhere.

P3. The Chinese own a huge share of the USA's debt! IF the USA-EU economic bridge is not strengthened then China will face disaster! The Iranian Regime is actually crumbling within! The Iranian people are wisening-up and are also disgusted by their Regime's support for Assad: even as they fear for their fellow Shia minority in Syria. The USA, EU and the Arab OPEC nations want to insure that the Syrian Shia & Christian minority will have a separate part of a divided Syria ( for the sake of peace).

This is all about oil routes to the Caspian basin through Syria and Iran - nothing else. Everything else is just smoke and mirrors. Israel supplies chemical agents to the "rebels" in Syria in a classic false flag op.

It is partly about that too. But neither Israel nor Saudi Arabia would risk supplying anyone with Chemical Weapons. Absolute hogwash! My take on things holds. Mark my words: China is going to pressure Putin to agree to let go of Syria...in exchange for other concessions.

The use of Phosphorus is a grey line issue. I won't debate that. You can do your own more serious research and realise that it did not amount to anything at all like the actual chemical attacks used by Saddam Hussein and now by Bashar.

"staged 911" = CRAP! I have done extensive research, and along with Noam Chomsky ( with whom I don't agree on some other issues ), I can state, without the slightest doubt; it was almost exactly as the official report concluded. I have my own take on how it was a combination of the actual perpetrators ( the ones the official report points fingers at ) and a massively failed attempt to catch them just before they could actually go beyond a certain point. No doubt it was exploited to the max by the Neo-Cons and others who have undermined things. No doubt there was plenty of conflict-profiteering ( still going on ). But it was not as most of the existing conspiracy theories suggest. The truth is somewhere between the official report conclusion and the milder conspiracy theories. And please: I am not interested in debating this here. You can go to my YouTube channel and check out my various videos.