Are children more sensitive to radiation than adults?

Transcription

1 Are children more sensitive to radiation than adults? By Madan M. Rehani Director of Radiation Protection, European Society of Radiology There is a commonly held belief that children may be two to three times more sensitive to radiation than adults. According to the latest findings of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), the general perception that children are more vulnerable to radiation exposure than adults is only partly true. While there are clear instances of an increased risk of radiation induction of some cancers for children, compared to adults, children actually have a lower risk or equivalent risk for other types. There are similar examples with regard to deterministic effects. The UNSCEAR report is expected to be made available online in October Please refer to This article provides a summary of the main messages from the upcoming report, Effects of Radiation Exposure on Children. UNSCEAR advises that in any discussion of the effects of childhood radiation exposure, generalisations are best avoided and attention should be directed to the specifics of the exposure, age at exposure, absorbed dose to certain tissues, age at the time of assessment, and the particular effects in question. The term radiation sensitivity with regard to cancer induction refers to the rate of radiogenic tumour induction and does not refer to the degree of malignancy. Generally, for about 25% of tumour types children are clearly more radiosensitive. These include leukaemia, as well as thyroid, skin, breast and brain cancer. 15% of tumour types (such as bladder cancer) children appear to have about the same radiosensitivity for tumour induction as adults. 10% of tumour types (e.g. lung cancer) children appear less sensitive to external radiation exposure than adults.

2 20% of tumour types (including oesophagus cancer) the data are too weak to draw a conclusion regarding differences in risk with age at exposure. 30% of tumour types (including Hodgkin s lymphoma, prostate, rectum and uterus cancer) there is only a weak or no relationship between radiation exposure and risk at any age of exposure. Currently used estimates do not adequately capture the known variations and additional work is needed. What is the situation for direct effects (deterministic) that occur after high acute or high fractionated doses? The differences in deterministic effects between exposure in childhood and adulthood are complex and can be explained by the interaction of different tissues and pathways. These effects may be seen after justified radiation therapy or following accidental exposure. The radiation sensitivity of children as compared with adults for deterministic effects in a specific organ is often different from that for tumour induction. There are some instances where childhood exposure poses more risk than adult exposure (e.g. for cognitive defects, cataracts and thyroid nodules). There are other instances where the risk appears to be about the same (e.g. neuroendocrine and kidney) and there are a few instances where a child s tissue is more resistant (e.g. lung function, immune system, marrow and ovarian failure). There have been many human studies of possible heritable effects following radiation exposure. These studies have led to the conclusion that no heritable effects in humans due to radiation exposure have been conclusively identified (specifically studies on the children of atomic bomb survivors). Over the past decade, there have been additional studies that have focused on survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer, and gonadal doses from radiotherapy are often very high. There is essentially no evidence of an increase in chromosomal instability, minisatellite mutation, transgenerational genomic instability, congenital anomalies or cancer risk for children of individuals exposed to radiation. There is also no evidence to suggest changes in the sex ratio of offspring. The reasons for the differences in the radiosensitivity between children and adults are easy to explain for some effects (e.g. the developmental and physiological status of the brain) while in many other instances the reason for the different effects between children and adults is unknown. children have smaller body diameters and there is less shielding from overlying tissues for a given external exposure the dose to children s internal organs will be higher than for an adult The report aims to answer the following questions: What are the most important sources of ionising radiation exposure to children and the levels of exposure, both now and potentially in the future? What are the dosimetric differences between children and adults? How does ionising radiation affect children differently from adults?

3 How sensitive are children to radiation exposure in comparison with adults? What are the factors that make children more sensitive to radiation exposure? Are children more sensitive to all radiation sources and effects or just to some? What gaps exist in our knowledge of radiation effects following childhood exposure that may guide future research?

AAPM REPORT NO. 50 Fetal Dose from Radiotherapy with Photon Beams Published for the American Association of Physicists in Medicine by the American Institute of Physics AAPM REPORT NO. 50 Fetal Dose from

Special Section: Cancer in Children & Adolescents Overview The news of a cancer diagnosis is never welcome, but may be even more unexpected and difficult when the disease is diagnosed in a child or adolescent.

Consumers, the health system and health literacy: Taking action to improve safety and quality Consultation Paper June 2013 Commonwealth of Australia 2013 This work is copyright. It may be reproduced in

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE ICH HARMONISED TRIPARTITE GUIDELINE GUIDELINE ON THE NEED FOR CARCINOGENICITY STUDIES

World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe Copenhagen Air Quality Guidelines for Europe Second Edition WHO Regional Publications, European Series, No. 91 The World Health Organization was established

It takes a village to raise a child Adoption UK survey on adoption support by Erika Pennington Contents Introduction 3 Executive summary 7 Adoption: the current picture 9 Why support? 10 About trauma 11

How Universal is Access to Reproductive Health? A review of the evidence Cover Copyright UNFPA 2010 September 2010 Publication available at: http://www.unfpa.org/public/home/publications/pid/6526 The designations

Assessing the State of Vaccine Confidence In the United States: Recommendations from the National Vaccine Advisory Committee Draft Report: Version 2 March 10, 2015 1 2 Every day with a child, I have discovered,

Talking about good professional practice Views on what it means to be a good doctor Talking about good professional practice 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 2 FOREWORD 3 INTRODUCTION 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Radon What is radon? Radon is a radioactive gas. It is colorless, odorless, tasteless, and chemically inert. Unless you test for it, there is no way of telling how much is present. Radon is formed by the

Assessment of the Need for Palliative Care for Children Three Country Report: South Africa, Kenya and Zimbabwe November 2013 1 Acknowledgements This report was commissioned by the United Nations Children

Cellphones: Safe or Carcinogenic? With an estimated five billion worldwide users, the public debate over cellphone and the possible link to cancer is one of critical importance. The concern is that cellphones

ehp LESSON: Are EDCs Blurring Issues of Summary: Gender? Students read the article Are EDCs Blurring Issues of Gender? and identify and summarize the research cited within the article. Students then decide

BRIEFING PAPER November 2005 Are Women Opting Out? Debunking the Myth BY HEATHER BOUSHEY Executive Summary A front page article in the New York Times (Story 2005) recently reported that women at Yale University

Clinical Trials: What You Need to Know Clinical trials are studies in which people volunteer to test new drugs or devices. Doctors use clinical trials to learn whether a new treatment works and is safe

Which Design Is Best? Which Design Is Best? In Investigation 2-8: Which Design Is Best? students will become more familiar with the four basic epidemiologic study designs, learn to identify several strengths

UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre Report Card 9 The children left behind A league table of inequality in child well-being in the world s rich countries Innocenti Report Card 9 was written by Peter Adamson.