Digging the dirt on commercial real estate transactions and law in Chicago and beyond

The Powerhouse Building

Why Dirt Lawyer?

Attorneys specializing in real estate transactions are referred to commonly as "dirt lawyers." It is not a bad thing. The term "real estate lawyer" just sounds so boring. And really, we're not boring people! I swear! (Okay, not all of us are, at least.) Thus, I created the Dirt Lawyer's Blog, and whether you agree or disagree about the boring part, I welcome you. Enjoy!

Links

Monday, March 14, 2011

I don't get it. I guess I am not just not as smart as the folks in Bentonville. Walmart was originally a dumpy box of a store with the interior feel of a warehouse. It wasn't a great place to shop, although it sure was the place to buy American and cheaply, at that. Now the stores look nicer and the products are all from China but the media says Target, which I still enjoy way, way more than a Walmart, may be cheaper. (My wife prefers Walmart locally because of size, perceived value and the fact that our Target isn't a super store.)

But that isn't the main thrust of this piece. Rather, it is about the small store format that the company is pursing. I really don't get that. So Walmart is going to open a 10,000 sf store in Chatham, a south side Chicago area known as a solid middle class minority neighborhood. (Yes, I have driven through it and driven by this site many times. It is not a particularly pedestrian friendly location, though not an awful one either.) Okay, that is bigger than a 7/11 or convenience store but smaller than a Walgreen's and certainly small than the Jewel-Osco almost next door, where you can get a whole lot more selection. The only thing I guess they figure is price will win.

But then there is a different issue: cannibalization. The company is building a SuperCenter right in the neighborhood. One store will not siphon off the other? The one saving grace of the small format store is fewer employees, perhaps meaning less overhead. I can see a store like this in central business districts, but in a urban area next to a Lowe's and a Home Depot, not to mention a Marshall's and a Best Buy? Not getting this one at all.

Walmart was at its best when it followed the tenets of Mr. Sam. This is away from that, in my opinion. As this post from a couple of weeks ago says, "As retired executives at A & P and Sears could tell Wal-Mart executives, the middle is a very bad place for retailers to be." In my eyes, at least, Walmart is better off going back to 1978 than in this direction.

Full disclosure: we do own a very -- indeed, laughably -- small amount of Walmart stock.

PS: Many thanks to my friend Duke Long for encouraging me to write this.

1 comments:

I think they are trying to backfill all spaces in the market with smaller stores where they can't fit a larger store or already have a couple of large stores and just want to fill a few small corridors. They will start to compete for commercial real estate sites with CVS and Walmart. It may also give them an easier start in a city where they don't think they can get a large store approved, but they could get a small store approved to start to win over the support of the community.

Subscribe to The DLB

Twitter Updates

Twitter Updates

The Usual Disclaimer

I'm not giving out legal advice here about any specific matter. And I'm not creating an attorney-client relationship with you. I am alawyer, but I am not your lawyer, at least not without a written agreement that says so. If you want specific legal advice about a matter, call or write. Paying me helps too. And tax advice? Yeah, right. Do I look or write or act like a tax lawyer? No such thing here, IRS Circular 230 and all that.