This site uses cookies from Google and other third parties to deliver its services, to personalise adverts and to analyse traffic. Information about your use of this site is shared with Google. By using this site, you agree to its use of cookies. Read our policy.

Up until now, atmospheric geoengineering research had focused on injecting sulfates into the stratosphere, but this would generate sulfuric acid and damage the ozone layer. Conversely, calcite or limestone would neutralise the acids HNO2, HCl and HBr, which provide the nitrogen, chlorine and bromine radicals that destroy ozone. ‘This would restore the ozone layer, though not perfectly,’ says senior author David Keith at Harvard University. ‘A base would react with those main acids in the stratosphere, which are dominant in the catalytic cycles that manage ozone.’

An ideal particle size would be half a micrometre in diameter. These could be dispersed at an altitude around 18 to 20km, between about 20 and 30° latitude. ‘That would give you a pretty even distribution,’ says Keith.

Critical to his calculations is a 2D chemical transport and aerosol micro-physics model built to handle liquid aerosol, solid aerosol and liquid-coated solid aerosol. An input of 5.6 million tonnes a year of calcite would reduce radiative forcing of climate by 2W/m2, enough to counter all the warming effects of carbon dioxide.

‘We are not suggesting that we go ahead and manipulate the whole planet, but a flight experiment from a stratosphere balloon could make a small cloud of aerosol, with a few hundred grams of material and allow us to make real in situ measurements of stratospheric chemistry,’ says Keith. There are lots of uncertainties about reaction rates at present, he adds.

Keith suggests a gradual ramp up of particles would be the best approach. Getting a million tonnes of material into the lower stratosphere is feasible and would cost about a dollar a kilogram. One major challenge is how to disperse a fine solid aerosol.

An assortment of species has been proposed previously for such geoengineering projects. The list includes sulfates, sea salt and numerous metal oxides. ‘Calcium carbonate does have the advantage of probably being the only compound that could claim to have a positive effect on ozone,’ notes atmospheric chemist Matt Watson at Bristol University, UK.

‘Calcium carbonate is incredibly cheap and it’s not to tough to fly to 20km. Most of the hurdles would be political under those circumstances, certainly not financial,’ Watson concludes. He notes potential scientific concerns, such as global temperatures affecting rainfall patterns, and political concerns, such as who gets to decide the Earth’s new temperature.

‘Technically it is possible to talk about deployment in the late 2020s,’ Keith notes. ‘But decisions about deployment will ultimately be made by nations or major NGOs, and no one knows how decisions about climate are going to be made.’