Here are a few takeaways, clarifications, and open questions surrounding the move.

— Gothamist is returning, but DNAinfo isn’t. Joe Ricketts’ acquisition of Gothamist last March was seen as an effort to shore up the business operations at DNAinfo, which struggled to turn a profit. Sadly, DNAinfo is staying dead, which is disheartening given that the site’s intense focus on aggressive hyper-local original reporting (Gothamist, in contrast, generally relied heavily on aggregation.) A consolation: WNYC will maintain DNAinfo’s archives, which were taken offline when the site shutdown last fall and have been in limbo since.

— Gothamist will operate separately, at least for now.Talking to The New York Times, Jim Schachter, head of WNYC’s news division, said that, under the station, Gothamist will operate exactly how it used to — though it’s clear that the site will have to make some editorial tweaks to meet WNYC’s guidelines. Gothamist founders Jake Dobkin and Jen Chung, who helped lead the deal, will run the relaunched site, along with an “editorial transition team” of 3–4 former Gothamist writers, as well as 2-3 WNYC reporters, for the initial phases. “The integration team will be cross functional and will help to integrate Gothamist into NYPR,” WNYC president Laura Walker wrote in a memo to WNYC staffers on Friday.

— LAist and DCist are back, too. The two sites will be operated by KPCC in Los Angeles and D.C.’s WAMU, respectively. As with WNYC and Gothamist, WAMU said that it plans to run DCist separately, and will bring on three full-time staffers to run the site, plus freelancers, as Andrew Beaujon reported on Friday. As for LAist, KPCC says that it also plans to run the operation separately, though LAist articles will likely appear on KPCC.org and vice versa, according to KPCC CEO Bill Davis.. To join the consortium, both stations had to pay a fee, which reporting on KPCC’s site “deduced” to beabout $50,000. (Other Gothamist sides, including SFist and Chicagoist aren’t being revivied, at least not with the current lineup of radio stations.)

5) What about DCist’s focus on the District at a time when WAMU is trying to broaden its ambit to the whole region? Again, not determined but “We don’t plan to take our existing roadmap for our newsroom and superimpose it on DCist.”

— Gothamist union representation is still TBD. Ironically, unionization, the very thing that contributed to Gothamist and DNAinfo being shut down, remains unresolved with the new formation, at least at WNYC. In contrast, KPCC’s Davis said that LAist’s current writers will be covered by SAG-AFTRA, the union that represents KPCC news staff.

Interestingly @WNYC‘s digital staff are excluded from union contract. So @Gothamist alums, having been shut down for unionizing, may be unionless at WNYC (tho maybe only Gothamist managers will go to WNYC anyway). [sans typo] https://t.co/biBG9N0wj2

The members of the DNAist Union are learning about the sale with the rest of the public, and are eager to learn more details about what this revival will entail. We look forward to hearing from @WNYC about what their plans are for the future of the site and its former employees.

since @fractenberg and I are apparently in print @nytimes (thanks mom) some facts: 1) yep, we unionized, it was awesome. Ben and I and our coworkers came together and forged bonds despite the different flavors of our sites. Then we got shut down! pic.twitter.com/dE0x64LRyl

— Just who are these anonymous donors?Probably the biggest unanswered question in the whole Gothamist revival story is who helped fund it, and why. In a post on Substack on Friday, Felix Salmon called the anonymous donations a kind of “catalytic philanthropy,” because it gave the public radio stations enough up-front capital to make the deal happen. And while there’s some understandable trepidation about Gothamist trading one wealthy benefactor for another, one of the benefits of the new arrangement seems to be that that the donations come with no strings attached.

Salmon writes:

In this case, however, the radio stations could assure the philanthropists that they weren’t going to ask for any money for operations. The donation would go straight to paying Ricketts for his valuable intellectual property, and then the sites could basically support themselves. And because the radio stations would pay Ricketts, the donors could give the money via the radio stations, making their gifts tax-deductible and fully in line with any kind of charitable-foundation guidelines

I think knowing who finances a news outlet is important because owners and funders sometimes have a specific ideological point of view

Also re the Public Radio/Gothamist deal is the question of who was paid what in the transaction. I expect all of this will come out soon enough–either because the parties realize the necessity of more transparency or because David Uberti or someone else uncovers it.