The first person to see Oswald after the assassination was Dallas Patrolman
Marrion Baker, who had been riding a motorcycle behind the last camera car in the motorcade. As he reached a position
some 60 to 80 feet past the turn from Main Street onto Houston, Baker heard the first shot (3H246). Immediately
after the last shot, he "revved up that motorcycle" and drove it to a point near a signal light on the
northwest corner of Elm and Houston (3H247). From here Baker ran 45 feet to the main entrance of the Book Depository,
pushing through people and quickly scanning the area. At the main entrance, Baker's shouts for the stairs were
spontaneously answered by building manager Roy Truly as both men continued across the first floor to the northwest
corner, where Truly hollered up twice for an elevator. When an elevator failed to descend, Truly led Baker up the
adjacent steps to the second floor. From the second floor, Truly continued up the steps to the third; Baker, however,
did not. The Report describes the situation:

On the second floor landing there is a small open area with a door at
the east end. This door leads into a small vestibule, and another door leads from the vestibule into the second-floor
lunchroom. The lunchroom door is usually open, but the first door is kept shut by a closing mechanism on the door.
This vestibule door is solid except for a small glass window in the upper part of the door. As Baker reached the
second floor, he was about 20 feet from the vestibule door. He intended to continue around to his left toward the
stairway going up but through the window in the door he caught a fleeting glimpse of a man walking in the vestibule
toward the lunchroom. (R151)

Baker ran into the vestibule with his pistol drawn and stopped the man,
who turned out to be Lee Harvey Oswald. Truly, realizing that Baker was no longer following him, came down to the
second floor and identified Oswald as one of his employees. The two men then continued up the stairs toward the
Depository roof.

"In an effort to determine whether Oswald could have descended to
the lunchroom from the sixth floor by the time Baker and Truly arrived," the Commission staged a timed reconstruction
of events. The Commission knew that this encounter in the lunchroom such a short time after the shots could have
provided Oswald with an alibi, thus exculpating him from involvement in the shooting. The reconstruction could
not establish whether Oswald was at the sixth-floor window; it could, however, tell whether he was {not}. In the
interest of determining the truth, it was vital that this reenactment be faithfully conducted, simulating the proper
actions to the most accurate degree possible.

From beginning to end, the execution of the reconstruction was in disregard
of the known actions of the participants, stretching--if not by intent, certainly in effect--the time consumed
for Baker to have arrived on the second floor and shrinking the time for the "assassin's" descent.[1]

To begin with, the reconstruction of Baker's movements started at the
wrong time. Baker testified that he revved up his motorcycle immediately after the {last} shot (3H247). However,
Baker's time was clocked from a simulated {first} shot (3H252). To compare the time of the assassin's descent with
that of Baker's ascent, the reconstruction obviously had to start after the last shot. Since the time span of the
shots was, according to the Report, from 4.8 to over 7 seconds, the times obtained for Baker's movements are between
{4.8 and 7 seconds in excess}.

Although Baker testified that he was flanking the last "press"
car in the motorcade (3H245), the record indicates that he was, in fact, flanking the last {camera} car--the last
of the convertibles carrying the various photographers, closer to the front of the procession than the vehicles
carrying other press representatives. Baker said he was some 60 to 80 feet along Houston Street north of Main when
he heard the first shot (3H246). Those in the last camera car were also in this general location at the time of
the first shot (Jackson: 2H158; Couch: 6H156; Dillard: 6H163-64; Underwood: 6H169;). During the reconstruction,
Baker drove his motorcycle from his location at the time of the {first} shot a distance of 180 to 200 feet to the
point in front of the Depository at which he dismounted (3H247). However, since Baker had revved up his cycle immediately
after the {last} shot on November 22, the distance he traveled in the reenactment was entirely too long. Since
the motorcade advanced about 116 feet during the time span of the shots, the distance Baker should have driven
in the reconstruction was no greater than 84 feet (200 - 116 = 84). This would have placed Baker near the intersection
of Elm and Houston at the time he revved up his cycle, not 180 feet from it as was reconstructed. Likewise, the
men in the last camera car recalled being in proximity to the intersection at the time of the last shot (Underwood:
6H169; Couch: 6H158; Jackson: 2H159).

With 116 feet extra to travel in a corresponding added time of 4.8 to
7 seconds, Baker was able to reach the front entrance of the Depository in only 15 seconds during the reconstruction
(7H593). Had the reenactment properly started at the time of the last shot, it follows that Baker could have reached
the main entrance in 8 to 10 seconds. Did Baker actually consume so little time in getting to the Depository on
November 22?

The Commission made no effort to answer this question, leaving an incomplete
and unreliable record. Billy Lovelady, Bill Shelley, Joe Molina, and several other employees were standing on the
steps of the Depository's main entrance during the assassination. Lovelady and Shelley testified that another employee,
Gloria Calvery, ran up to them and stated that the President had been shot; the three of them began to run west
toward the parking lot, at which time they saw Truly and a police officer run into the Depository (6H329-31, 339).
This story is contradicted by Molina, who contended that Truly (he did not notice Baker) ran into the main entrance
before Gloria Calvery arrived (6H372). Mrs. Calvery was not called to testify, and the one statement by her to
the FBI does not address this issue. From her position just east of the Stemmons Freeway sign on the north side
of Elm (22H638), it does not seem likely that she could have made the 150-foot run to the main entrance in only
15 seconds. Yet, adding to this confusion is an affidavit that Shelly executed for the Dallas Police on November
22, 1963. Here he stated that {he} ran down to the "park" on Elm Street and met Gloria Calvery {there}
(24H226). Obviously, the issue cannot be resolved through these witnesses.

While Molina felt that Truly ran into the Depository some 20 to 30 seconds
after the shots (6H372), Lovelady and Shelley estimated that as much as three minutes had elapsed (6H329, 339).
When Counsel Joe Ball cautioned Lovelady that "three minutes is a long time," Lovelady partially retracted
because he did not have a watch then and could not be exact (6H339). Supporting Molina's estimate, Roy Truly told
the Secret Service in December 1963 that Baker made his way to the front entrance "almost immediately"
(CD87, Secret Service Control No. 491); almost a year later Truly said on a CBS News Special that Baker's arrival
"was just a matter of seconds after the third shot."[2]

I was able to resolve the issue concerning Baker's arrival at the Depository
through evidence strangely absent from the Commission's record. Malcolm Couch, riding in the last camera car (Camera
Car 3), took some very important motion-picture footage immediately after the shots. Couch, whose car was almost
at the intersection of Elm and Houston when the last shot sounded, immediately picked up his camera, made the proper
adjustments, and began filming (6H158). Others in Camera Car 3 related how their car came to a stop or hesitated
in the middle of the turn into Elm to let some of the photographers out (2H162; 6H165, 169). Couch's film begins
slightly before the stop, just as the car was making the turn (6H158). From Couch's testimony and the scenes depicted
in his film, in addition to the testimony of others in the same car, it can be determined that Couch began filming
no more than 10 seconds after the last shot.[3]

The first portion of the Couch film depicts the crowds dispersing along
the island at the northwest corner of Elm and Houston. The camera pans in a westerly direction as the grassy knoll
and Elm Street come into view. In these beginning sequences, a motorcycle is visible, parked next to the north
curb of Elm, very slightly west of a traffic light at the head of the island. Baker testified that he parked his
cycle 10 feet {east} of this signal light (3H247-48). The position of the motorcycle in the Couch film is not in
great conflict with the position at which Baker recalled having dismounted; it is doubtful that Baker paid much
attention to the exact position of his motorcycle in those confused moments. It would appear that this cycle, identical
with the others driven in the motorcade, {must} have been Baker's, for it is not visible in any photographs taken
{during} the shots, including footage of that area by David Weigman,[4] and no other motorcycle officer arrived
at that location in so short a time after the shots. No policeman appears on or around the cycle depicted in the
Couch film.

Thus, photographic evidence known to, but never sought by, the Commission
proves that Officer Baker had parked and dismounted his motorcycle {within 10 seconds after the shots}. Corroborative
evidence is found in the testimony of Bob Jackson, also riding in Camera Car 3. Jackson told the Commission that
after the last shot, as his car hesitated through the turn into Elm, he saw a policeman run up the Depository steps,
toward the front door (2H164). This is entirely consistent with Baker's abandoned motorcycle's appearing at this
same time in the Couch film.

During the Baker-Truly reconstructions, Baker reached the second floor
in one minute and 30 seconds on the first attempt and one minute, 15 seconds on the second (3H252). Since Baker's
simulated movements up to the time he reached the main entrance consumed 15 seconds (7H593), the actions subsequent
to that must have been reenacted in a span of one minute to about 75 seconds. However, since Baker actually reached
the main entrance within 10 seconds on November 22, the reconstructed time is cut by at least five seconds. Further
reductions are in order.

Officer Baker described the manner in which he simulated his movements
subsequent to dismounting his motorcycle:

From the time I got off the motorcycle we walked the first time and then
we kind of run the second time from the motorcycle on into the building. (3H253)

Baker neither walked nor "kind of" ran to the Depository entrance
on November 22. From his own description, he surveyed the scene as he was parking his cycle, and then "{ran}
straight to" the main entrance (3H248-249). Billy Lovelady also swore that Baker was {running} (6H339). However,
Truly provided the most graphic description of Baker's apparent "mad dash" to the building:

I saw a young motorcycle policeman {run} up to the building, up the steps
to the entrance of our building. He {ran} right by me. And he was pushing people out of the way. He pushed a number
of people out of the way before he got to me. I saw him coming through, I believe. As he {ran} up the stairway--I
mean up the steps, I was almost to the steps, and I {ran} up and caught up with him. (3H221; emphasis added)

Thus, walking through this part of the reconstruction was, as Harold Weisberg
aptly termed it, pure fakery, unnecessarily and unfaithfully burdening Baker's time.[5] The Report, on the other
hand, assures us that the time on November 22 would actually have been {longer}, because "no allowance was
made for the special conditions which existed on the day of the assassination--possible delayed reaction to the
shot, jostling with the crowd of people on the steps and scanning the area along Elm Street and the Parkway"
(R152-53). Had the Commission directed any significant effort to obtaining as many contemporaneous pictures as
possible--including those taken by Couch--it could not have engaged in such excuse-making. Even at that, how could
the Commission dare go to all the efforts of staging a reconstruction and then admit-- to its own advantage--that
it deliberately failed to simulate actions? As was discussed in chapter 1, this child's play was inexcusable as
an effort bearing such weight in deciding Oswald's guilt. The Couch film eliminates the possibility that the factors
mentioned in the Report could have slowed Baker down. As for "jostling with the crowd of people on the steps,"
the Report neglected to mention other disproof of this as a slowing factor. As Truly testified,

when the officer and I ran in, we were shouldering people aside in front
of the building, so we possibly were slowed a little bit more coming in than we were when he and I came in on March
20 (date of the reconstruction). {I don't believe so. But it wouldn't be enough to matter there}. (3H228; emphasis
added)

Once in the building during the reconstruction, the two men proceded [sic]
to the elevators "at a kind of trot . . . it wasn't a real fast run, an open run. It was more of a trot, kind
of" (3H253). This, again, was not an accurate simulation of the real actions. While Truly admitted that the
reconstruction pace across the first floor was "about" the same as that of November 22, he described
the former as a trot and the latter as "a little more than a trot" (3H228). Baker himself said that once
through the door, he and Truly "kind of ran, not real fast but, you know, {a good trot}" (3H249), not
the "kind of trot" he described during the reconstruction. A swinging door at the end of the lobby in
the main entrance was jammed because the bolt had been stuck. Apparently, the pace on November 22 was of sufficient
speed for Truly to bang right into this door and Baker to subsequently collide with Truly in the instant before
the door was forced open (3H222). Likewise, Eddie Piper, a first-floor witness, had seen the two men {run} into
the building, yell up for an elevator, and "take off" up the stairs (6H385).

In walking through part of the reconstruction, which should have been
conducted running and was begun at least five seconds early, Baker and Truly managed to arrive on the second floor
in one minute, 30 seconds. In the reconstruction, equally begun too early but staged at a pace closer to, though
not simulating that of November 22, the time narrowed to a minute and 15 seconds. While Baker and Truly felt that
the reconstructed times were minimums (3H228, 253), it would seem that the opposite was true. Subtracting the extra
seconds tacked on by including the time span of the shots reduces even the maximum time to one minute, 25 seconds.
The understandably hurried pace of November 22 as manifested in all the evidence would indicate that Truly and
Baker reached the second floor in under 85 seconds, and the Couch film introduces the possibility that it may have
taken as little as 70 seconds, since Baker parked and abandoned his motorcycle within ten seconds of the last shot.

The second part of the reconstruction was supposed to have simulated the
"assassin's" movements from the sixth-floor window down to the second- floor lunchroom. Here the figurative
lead weights tied to Baker and Truly during the reconstruction of their movements are exchanged for figurative
roller skates, to shorten the time of the "assassin's" descent.

Secret Service Agent John Howlett stood in for the "assassin."
He executed an affidavit for the Commission in which he described his actions:

I carried a rifle from the southeast corner of the sixth floor northernly
along the east aisle to the northern corner, then westernly [{sic}] along the north wall past the elevators to
the northwest corner. There I placed the rifle on the floor. I then entered the stairwell, walked down the stairway
to the second floor landing, and then into the lunchroom. (7H592)

This test was done twice. At a "normal walk" it took one minute
and 18 seconds; at a "fast walk," one minute, 14 seconds (3H254). This reconstruction also suffered from
most serious ommissions.[sic]

The "assassin" could not just have walked away from his window
as Howlett apparently did. If the gunman fired the last shot from the Carcano as the official theory demands, a
minimum time of 2.3 seconds after the last shot must be added to the reconstructed time since the cartridge case
from that shot had to be ejected--an operation that involves working the rifle bolt. Furthermore, witnesses recalled
that the gunman had been in no hurry to leave his window (2H159; 3H144).

There were also physical obstructions that prevented immediate evacuation
of the area. Commission Exhibit 734 shows that some stacks of boxes nearest to the "assassin's" window
did not extend far enough toward the east wall of the building to have blocked off the window there completely.
However, as Commission Exhibits 723 and 726 clearly show, other columns of boxes were situated behind the first
stacks; these formed a wall that had no openings large enough for a man to penetrate without contortion. Deputy
Sheriff Luke Mooney discovered three cartridge cases by this window. He had to squeeze "between these two
stacks of boxes, I had to turn myself sideways to get in there" (3H285). The gunman would have had to squeeze
through these stacks of boxes while carrying a 40-inch, 8-pound rifle. Considering these details, we must add at
least six or seven seconds to the Commission's time to allow for the various necessary factors that would slow
departure from the window.

To simulate the hiding of the rifle, Howlett "leaned over as if he
were putting a rifle there [near the stair landing at the northwest corner of the sixth floor]" (3H253). The
Commission did not do justice to its putative assassin who, as the photographs reveal, took meticulous care in
concealing his weapon. The mere act of gaining access to the immediate area in which the rifle was hidden required
time. This is what Deputy Sheriff Eugene Boone went through before he discovered the rifle:

As I got to the west wall, there were a row of windows there, and a slight
space between some boxes and the wall. I squeezed through them. . . . I caught a glimpse of the rifle, stuffed
down between two rows of boxes with another box or so pulled over the top of it. (3H293)

Luke Mooney "had to get around to the right angle" before he
could see the rifle (3H298). Likewise, Deputy Constable Seymour Weitzman reported that "it was covered with
boxes. It was very well protected as far as the naked eye" (7H107). Another Deputy Sheriff, Roger Craig, recalled
that the ends of the rows between which the rifle had been pushed were closed off by boxes, so that one could not
see through them (6H269).

Photographs of the area in which the rifle was found (e.g., CE 719), and
a bird's-eye view of the hidden rifle itself (e.g., CE 517), corroborate what these men have described and add
other information. CE 719 shows that the rifle was found amid clusters of boxes that did not permit easy access.
CE 517, in particular, is very revealing. It shows that the rifle had been pushed upright on its side between two
rows of boxes that partially overlapped on top, thus eliminating the possibility that the rifle had merely been
dropped down between the stacks. CE 517 also demonstrates that both ends of the rows of boxes were partially sealed
off by other boxes, indicating a possibility never pursued by the Commission--namely, that boxes had to be moved
to gain access to the weapon. When interviewed by CBS News, Seymour Weitzman inadvertently admitted this fact:

I'll be very frank with you. I stumbled over it two times, not knowing
it was there. . . . And Mr. Bone [sic] was climbing on top, and I was down on my knees looking, and {I moved a
box, and he moved a carton, and there it was}. And he in turn hollered that we had found a rifle.[6]

Hence, the concealment of the rifle required much maneuvering. In addition
to squeezing in between boxes, the gunman had to move certain cartons filled with books. The rifle itself had been
very carefully placed in position. Doubtless this would have added {at least} 15, perhaps 20, seconds to the reconstructed
time {even if the hiding place had been chosen in advance} (of which there is no evidence either way).

If we take the Commission's minimum time of one minute, 14 seconds (giving
the advantage to the official story) and add the additional six or seven seconds needed just to evacuate the immediate
area of the window, plus the 15 to 20 seconds more for hiding the rifle, we find that it would have taken {at least}
a minute and 35 seconds to a minute and 41 seconds for a sixth-floor gunman to have reached the second-floor lunchroom,
{had all his maneuvers been planned in advance}. Had Oswald been the assassin, he would have arrived in the lunchroom
{at least} five to eleven seconds {after} Baker reached the second floor, even if Baker took the {longest} time
obtainable for his ascent--a minute, 30 seconds. Had Baker ascended in 70 seconds--as he easily could have--he
would have arrived at least 25 seconds before Oswald. Either case removes the possibility that Oswald descended
from the sixth floor, for on November 22 he had unquestionably arrived in the lunchroom {before} Baker.

The circumstances surrounding the lunchroom encounter indicate that Oswald
entered the lunchroom {not} by the vestibule door from without, as he would have had he descended from the sixth
floor, but through a hallway leading into the vestibule. The outer vestibule door is closed automatically by a
closing mechanism on the door (7H591). When Truly arrived on the second floor, he did not see Oswald entering the
vestibule (R151). For the Commission's case to be valid, Oswald must have entered the vestibule through the first
door before Truly arrived. Baker reached the second floor immediately after Truly and caught a fleeting glimpse
of Oswald in the vestibule through a small window in the outer door. Although Baker said the vestibule door "might
have been, you know, closing and almost shut at that time" (3H255), it is dubious that he could have distinguished
whether the door was fully or "almost" closed.

Baker's and Truly's observations are not at all consistent with Oswald's
having entered the vestibule through the first door. Had Oswald done this, he could have been inside the lunchroom
well before the automatic mechanism closed the vestibule door. Truly's testimony that he saw no one entering the
vestibule indicates either that Oswald was already in the vestibule at this time or was approaching it from another
source. However, had Oswald already entered the vestibule when Truly arrived on the second floor, it is doubtful
that he would have remained there long enough for Baker to see him seconds later. Likewise, the fact that neither
man saw the mechanically closed door in motion is cogent evidence that Oswald did not enter the vestibule through
that door.

One of the crucial aspects of Baker's story is his position at the time
he caught a "fleeting glimpse" of a man in the vestibule. Baker marked this position during his testimony
as having been immediately adjacent to the stairs at the northwest corner of the building (3H256; CE 497). "I
was just stepping out on to the second floor when I caught this glimpse of this man through this doorway,"
said Baker.

It should be noted that the Report never mentions Baker's position at
the time he saw Oswald in the {vestibule} (R149-51). Instead, it prints a floor plan of the second floor and notes
Baker's position "when he observed Oswald in {lunchroom}" (R150). This location, as indicated in the
Report, was immediately outside the vestibule door (see CE 1118). The reader of the Report is left with the impression
that Baker saw Oswald in the vestibule as well from this position. However, Baker testified explicitly that he
first caught a glimpse of the man in the vestibule from the stairs and, upon running to the vestibule door, saw
Oswald in the lunchroom (3H256). The Report's failure to point out Baker's position is significant.

Had Oswald descended from the sixth floor, his path through the vestibule
into the lunchroom would have been confined to the north wall of the vestibule. Yet the line of sight from Baker's
position at the steps does not include any area near the north wall. From the steps, Baker could have seen only
one area in the vestibule--the southeast portion. The only way Oswald could have been in this area on his way to
the lunchroom is if he entered the vestibule through the southernmost door, as the previously cited testimony indicates
he did.

Oswald could not have entered the vestibule in this manner had he just
descended from the sixth floor. The only way he could have gotten to the southern door is from the first floor
up through either a large office space or an adjacent corridor. As the Report concedes, Oswald told police he had
eaten his lunch on the first floor and gone up to the second to purchase a coke when he encountered an officer
(R182).

Thus, Oswald had an alibi. Had he been the sixth-floor gunman, he would
have arrived at the lunchroom {at least} 5 seconds {after} Baker did, probably more. It is extremely doubtful that
he could have entered the vestibule through the first door without Baker's or Truly's having seen the door in motion.
Oswald's position in the vestibule when seen by Baker was consistent only with his having come up from the first
floor as he told the police.

Oswald {could not} have been the assassin.

The Commission had great difficulty with facts, for none supported the
ultimate conclusions. Instead, it found comfort and security in intangibles that usually had no bearing on the
actual evidence. Amateur psychology seems to have been one of the Commission's favorite sciences, approached with
the predisposition that Oswald was a murderer. This was manifested in the Report's lengthy chapter, "Lee Harvey
Oswald: Background and Possible Motives" (R375-424).

To lend credibility to its otherwise incredible conclusion that Oswald
was the assassin, the Commission accused Oswald of yet another assassination attempt--a shot fired at right-wing
Maj. Gen. Edwin Walker on April 10, 1963 (R183-87). Thus, Oswald officially was not a newcomer to the "game"
of political assassination. Although I am not in accord with the conclusion that Oswald shot at Walker, I find
it illuminating that the Commission did not follow its inclination for psychology in its comparison of Oswald as
the Walker assailant to Oswald as the Kennedy assailant.

Having just torn open the head of the President of the United States,
as the Commission asserts, how did Oswald react when stopped by a policeman with a drawn gun? Roy Truly was first
asked about Oswald's reaction to the encounter with Baker:

Mr. Belin:
Did you see any expression on his face? Or weren't you paying attention?

Mr. Truly:
He didn't seem to be excited or overly afraid or anything. He might have been a little startled, like I might have
been if someone confronted me. But I cannot recall any change in expression of any kind on his face. (3H225)

Officer Baker was more explicit under similar questioning:

Rep. Boggs:
When you saw him [Oswald] . . ., was he out of breath, did he appear to have been running or what?

Mr. Baker:
It didn't appear that to me. He appeared normal you know.

Rep. Boggs:
Was he calm and collected?

Mr. Baker:
Yes, sir. He never did say a word or nothing. In fact, he didn't change his expression one bit.

Mr. Belin:
Did he flinch in anyway when you put the gun up . . .?

Mr. Baker:
No, sir. (3H252)

Sen. Cooper:
He did not show any evidence of any emotion?

Mr. Baker:
No, sir. (3H263)

This "calm and collected" "assassin" proceeded to
buy himself a coke and at his normal "very slow pace," was then observed by Depository employee Mrs.
Robert Reid walking through the office space on the second floor on his way down to the first floor (3H279). Presumably
he finished his coke on the first floor. Documents in the Commission's files (but omitted from the Report, which
assumes Oswald made an immediate get- away) indicate very strongly that, at the main entrance after the shots,
Oswald directed two newsmen to the Depository phones (CD354).

According to the evidence credited by the Commission, Oswald was not such
a cool cucumber after his first assassination attempt. Here the source of the Commission's information was Oswald's
wife, Marina, and his once close "friends," George and Jeanne De Mohrenschildt. The incident in question
is described in the Report as follows:

The De Mohrenschildts came to Oswald's apartment on Neely Street for the
first time on the evening of April 13, 1963 (three days after the Walker incident), apparently to bring an Easter
gift for the Oswald child. Mrs. De Mohrenschildt then told her husband, in the presence of the Oswalds, that there
was a rifle in the closet. Mrs. De Mohrenschildt testified that "George, of course, with his sense of humor--Walker
was shot at a few days ago, within that time. He said, `Did you take a pot shot at Walker by any chance?'"
At that point, Mr. De Mohrenschildt testified, Oswald "sort of shriveled, you see, when I asked this question
. . . made a peculiar face . . . (and) changed the expression on his face" and remarked that he did target-
shooting. Marina Oswald testified that the De Mohrenschildts came to visit a few days after the Walker incident
and that when De Mohrenschildt made his reference to Oswald's possibly shooting at Walker, Oswald's "face
changed, . . . he almost became speechless." According to the De Mohrenschildts, Mr. De Mohrenschildt's remark
was intended as a joke, and he had no knowledge of Oswald's involvement in the attack on Walker. Nonetheless, the
remark appears to have created an uncomfortable silence, and the De Mohrenschildts left "very soon afterwards."
(R282-83)

De Mohrenschildt further testified that his "joking" remark
"had an effect on" Oswald, making him "very, very uncomfortable" (9H249-50). In another section,
the Report adds that Oswald "was visibly shaken" by the remark (R274).

The Commission certainly chose a paradoxical assassin. We are asked to
believe, according to the Commission, that Oswald was guilty of attacking both Walker and Kennedy. Yet, this man
who officially became markedly upset when jokingly confronted with his attempt to kill Walker did not even flinch
when a policeman put a gun to his stomach immediately after he murdered the President!

The Commission begged for the charge of being ludicrous in drawing its
conclusions relevant to Oswald and the assassination; it insulted common sense and intelligence when it asked that
those conclusions be accepted and believed.

[1] The first critical analysis of these reconstructions appeared in "Whitewash,"
pp. 36-38.

[2] "CBS News Extra: `November 22 and the Warren Report,'" p.
28.

[3] To my knowledge, the Couch film is not commercially available. I was
fortunately able to obtain numerous stills made from individual frames of a copy of the Couch film, which was originally
obtained from the Dallas television station for which Couch worked. Due to the legalities involved, these pictures
can not be reproduced here.

[4] I obtained numerous frames from the Weigman film in the same manner
as described above. These can not be reproduced either.