A cop just stopped me and gave me a ticket for wearing Google Glass while driving! The exact line says: Driving with Monitor visible to Driver (Google Glass). Is #GoogleGlass illegal while driving or is this cop wrong??? Any legal advice is appreciated!! This happened in California.

A person shall not drive a motor vehicle if a television receiver, a video monitor, or a television or video screen, or any other similar means of visually displaying a television broadcast or video signal that produces entertainment or business applications, is operating and is located in the motor vehicle at a point forward of the back of the driver’s seat, or is operating and the monitor, screen, or display is visible to the driver while driving the motor vehicle.

San Diego traffic lawyer Michael Rehm told Law Blog the application of the law to Google Glass was a stretch, unless Ms. Abadie happened to be watching video while driving. (She says the gadget wasn’t on.)

“If you’re actually watching a video…..I would say it’s a violation,” Mr. Rehm said. “But simply having them on and the fact that you can get updates on the glasses, that’s like ticketing someone for having a smartphone in their center console.”

“I don’t see a violation. I think it’s defensible,” Mitchell Mehdy, a traffic lawyer in San Diego better known as “Mr. Ticket,” told Law Blog. “How is this guy psychically gonna know what she’s looking at?” Mr. Mehdy said the law makes exceptions for GPS and mapping displays, so even if Ms. Abadie had the glasses switched on, there are functions she likely would have been permitted to use.

Kirk Elliott of law firm Roberts & Elliott LLP said police may have had a better shot citing Ms. Abadie under another section of the vehicle code that prohibits drivers from having items in their car that obstruct their view.

“There’s no violation, unless they can claim on that right-hand side, Google Glass obstructs your peripheral view to the right,” he said. (Mr. Elliott, after watching a Google Glass demonstration online, said he was unconvinced they posed such an obstruction.)

Ms. Abadie was pulled over for speeding. (“I was in a 65 mph zone and thought I was on [sic] a 75 mph zone,” she said on her Google+ page.) Here is her account of what happened next:

When [the police officer] asked why was I wearing Glass while driving…I said I wear this all day long! I think he was trying to make me say what I was using it for so he kept asking why why why, but then when he saw [what] my answer was I’m not using it just wearing it, he broke out talking about how Glass was blocking my vision and he could not completely see my right eye.

As you probably know, most states have passed laws limiting the use of mobile devices while driving any motor vehicle, and most states post those rules on their department of motor vehicles websites. Read up and follow the law! Above all, even when you’re following the law, don’t hurt yourself or others by failing to pay attention to the road. The same goes for bicycling: whether or not any laws limit your use of Glass, always be careful.

Legislators in at least two states, Delaware and West Virginia, have submitted bills that would place Google Glass in the same category as cell phones, with an eye to banning its use while driving.

About Law Blog

The Law Blog covers the legal arena’s hot cases, emerging trends and big personalities. It’s brought to you by lead writer Jacob Gershman with contributions from across The Wall Street Journal’s staff. Jacob comes here after more than half a decade covering the bare-knuckle politics of New York State. His inside-the-room reporting left him steeped in legal and regulatory issues that continue to grab headlines.

Must Reads

Plaintiffs' lawyers dodged a bullet last year when the U.S. Supreme Court spared a quarter-century-old precedent that had served as the legal linchpin of the modern investor class-action case. Despite that win, a new report suggests that securities class actions have lost some of their firepower.

In a week in which images of Prophet Muhammad were connected to acts of terror and defiant expressions of freedom, a sculpture of the prophet of Islam inside the U.S. Supreme Court has drawn little notice.

The salacious allegations against Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz that surfaced in a federal lawsuit involving convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have generated international attention. Drawing less coverage is the lawsuit itself -- a case with the potential to expand the rights of crime victims during federal investigations.