Open letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B.
Mukasey, which argue for a new and complete investigation of 9/11 for the sake of establishing historical truth and pursuing
justice. Mukasey was not the one to pierce the conspiracy of silence against a host of unwelcome truths staring 9/11
researchers in the face. He never responded to any of these sixty letters. Only two boilerplate responses came
from his aides. So after more than seven years, we still need a full, fair and impartial investigation of 9/11!
(Click here to read a certified letter dated 23 July 2008 and mailed to the Attorney General in order to request his response to the
first ten open letters already sent by fax and email broadcast.) After Barack Obama became President of the USA, another
eighteen letters were sent to Mukasey's successor, Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder, but to no avail. Be that
as it may, copies of each letter to both Mukasey and Holder were sent by fax broadcast to every member of the United States
Congress, both Senate and House, to every embassy in Washington DC, to every mission to the United Nations in New York City,
and to numerous other organizations and individuals, public and private, for a total of approximately 2,500 faxed copies of
each letter.

Text of fax broadcast:

OPEN LETTER #01 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY

18 June 2008.

I write
to you, Mr. Attorney General, out of very deep concern that the true account of 9/11 has not been told, that there has been
a coverup, and that the intended result of the attacks is our presence in the Middle East, where six years later our already
constructed military bases are being forced on the people of Iraq and the USA with an odiously shameful status of forces agreement.
Your office is where a new and proper investigation of 9/11 can still be launched, and I urge you to move in this direction
for the sake of historical truth and the proper administration of justice.

As a citizen
of the USA, and as a former federal employee who watched the immediate aftermath of the hit on the south tower, World Trade
Center 2, from the southwest corner office on the 37th floor of 26 Federal Plaza, just a stone's throw from the courthouse
where you were then presiding as federal judge for the Southern District of New York, I have to say I am bothered by many
bits of verified information which have come to my attention. I believe these matters come under your purview and deserve
your personal attention on an urgent basis.

Photo taken from doorway of the Fire Department of New York's Ladder One Company and showing the Federal Building at Broadway
and Duane Street and the old federal courthouse at Foley Square at the far end of Duane Street at the very bottom. Rising
just to the left of the old courthouse is the new one housing the United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York. This is where Judge Michael B. Mukasey presided before becoming Attorney General of the United States on 9
November 2007. This writer saw the immediate aftermath of the second hit on the south tower WTC 2 from the southwest
corner office of the 37th floor of the Federal Building. The jet that hit the south tower was headed right for the United
States Air Force New York Regional Office 100 feet away at the southeast corner.

First, I wish to draw your attention to very telling remarks made by President
Bush at a town hall meeting in Orlando, Florida, on 4 December 2001, and reiterated in another town hall meeting in Ontario,
California, on 5 January 2002, in which he claimed that he saw the first jet hit the north tower, World Trade Center 1, on
a TV monitor just before entering the classroom in Florida where, several minutes later, his aide Andrew Card famously delivered
news of the hit on the south tower and the foregone conclusion that the USA was under attack. Bush's puzzling statements,
which appear on my website at http://www.show-the-house.com/id53.html along with links to the White House website where they were obtained, indicate foreknowledge or mental defect or both.

Therefore, I ask, when were you first apprised of these statements? How has the DoJ probed this matter?
What measures will you take in the immediate future to resolve this issue?

(Please note that
the contact information above, as well as the phone numbers 212 534 5024 and 917 519 2905 and the email address metatron.metatron@verizon.net,
are no longer current and have been deleted from all other letters in this series.)

OPEN LETTER #02 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY

22
June 2008

While I await your reply to my first letter to you regarding
President Bush's repeated claims that he saw on a TV monitor the first jet hit the WTC north tower in the opening surprise
attack of 9/11, which can only mean foreknowledge or mental defect or both, I turn your attention, Mr. Attorney General, to
yet another very grave matter of quite the opposite dynamic in which we have not seen what one would normally expect to see:
routine video surveillance evidence of the events of 9/11.

How is it that we have NEVER seen ANY credible video
surveillance evidence of ANY of the passengers -- let alone hijackers -- at ANY of the three high security ("Category
X") international airports from which the flights of 9/11 are said to have departed? How is it that after nearly
seven full years we still have not seen any of this routine video surveillance evidence or heard any explanation as to why
we haven't seen such basic evidence? How can this be explained?

Nearly every person in the world saw a constant
barrage of broadcast images of two alleged hijackers passing through a security checkpoint at Portland Maine International
Airport, but even these images are problematic with respect to time stamps, an airport employee's adamant testimony as to
the suspects' attire and the all too convenient discovery of questionable evidence in the suspects' delayed luggage.
These Portland images simply do not place the suspects in Boston! Why is there no video surveillance evidence
showing that these two individuals seen passing through Portland were at Boston's Logan International Airport on 9/11?

The news media's hyping of the Portland images goes hand in hand with a conspiracy of silence about the unexplained
lack of video surveillance evidence at the airports of 9/11. Of course the media is "free" to conduct its
propaganda in support of an ideology calling for world domination by fraud and by force, but the Department of Justice is
not.

Let me help you investigate 9/11.

Stephen M. St. John

Update September 2013: By way of clarification, the surveillance video from
Washington Dulles International Airport lacks a time-stamp and is therefore worthless as evidence of alleged hijackers at
this airport on the morning of 11 September 2001.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #03 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY26
June 2008

To continue, Mr. Attorney General, I recapitulate: you were appointed by
"a man of vision" who says he saw on TV as it happened what no other man on earth saw; namely, the first hit on
the north tower WTC 1, and you now preside over the priesthood of the ineffable mysteries of the 9/11 airport surveillance
tapes, the US Department of Justice. That's quite a distinction, isn't it? As a skeptic who sees no credible evidence
showing that any of the passengers said to have boarded the ill fated flights of 9/11 were even at these airports, I cannot
help but think there was a high tech framing of Arabs afoot as a pretext for putting American muscle on Mesopotomian patrol.
Do you understand?

Of course people not bothered by President Bush's darkly mysterious utterances and the sheer
lack of routine video surveillance evidence at the airports are also not bothered by the omission of the names of the alleged
hijackers in the passenger manifests published by United and American Airlines. Their fallback position is to cite cell
and airphone calls cited in the official conspiracy theory.

But a Canadian university mathematics professor, A.
Kee Dewdney, conducted experiments ruling out the possibility of cell phone calls from commerical jets. A USAF Public
Affairs officer at an outdoor Boeing exhibit at Rockefeller Center in 2003 told me he reached the same conclusion after he
and colleagues had conducted their own informal experiments. Dewdney brilliantly infers the use of real time digital
voice morphing as the only possible explanation of these "cell phone calls," and his examination of transcripts
of such calls, in the manner of the great literary critic I. A. Richards, concludes that the "cell phone" impersonators
were not top drawer. See http://physics911.net.

OPEN LETTER #04 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY

30 JUNE 2008

Let
me turn, Mr. Attorney General, to the aerial vehicle that hit the south tower, WTC 2. A colleague on the 37th floor
of the Federal Building at Duane and Broadway told me shortly afterwards that he had seen this jet making its approach over
New York harbor; he repeated with great emphasis that, at first sight, one wing pointed almost straight down to the ground
and the other straight up to the sky; his eyewitness testimony of the attacking jet's highly unusual attitude in New York
City airspace is corroborated by, among others, eyewitness testimonies of air traffic controllers in the control tower at
Newark Airport who saw a sharply banking jet turn across the harbor and slam into WTC 2.

Photo of south facade of 26 Federal Plaza taken from southwest corner of Broadway and Duane Street in Lower Manhattan.
On the 37th floor of this 40 story building, at the southeast corner to the right, is the New York Regional Office of the
United States Air Force. This writer stood about 100 feet to the left of it, at the southwest corner, from where he
saw the immediate aftermath of the hit on the south tower WTC 2, about four tenths of a mile to the south-southwest.
From nearly the same location his colleague saw the radically banking aerial vehicle making its approach over New York Harbor.
This jet was headed right for the Air Force office and would have crashed there had it not hit WTC 2 first!

Soon after 9/11, a retired US Army field officer
with long experience at the highest levels inside the Pentagon convened a group of military, civilian and commercial aviation
professionals, and their conclusion was unanimous: the flights that hit WTC 2 and the Pentagon could not possibly have
been piloted by flight students on their maiden voyages with training limited to routine procedures on flight simulators.
Donn de Grand Pré's group pointed to remote control as the best explanation for the unerring descending arcs made by
the jets at speeds normally reserved for high altitude cruising; the G-forces brought to bear would have posed an insurmountable
challenge to a human being.

So
you see, with no airport video surveillance evidence, and no names of alleged hijackers on airline manifests, and bogus cell
and air phone calls, this highly improbable scenario of aerial acrobatics over New York harbor needs a much better explanation
than the outrageous conspiracy theory we have been offered. Considering that the attacking jet was headed right for
the USAF office on the 37th floor of the Federal Building, that 9/11 Commission Co-Chairmen Kean and Hamilton expressed doubts
about the credibility of USAF testimonies, that President Bush has a history of gaming the upper echelons of NORAD from his
air national guard days, and that he says he saw the first jet's surprise attack on WTC 1, I ask, can you, a Bush appointee,
pursue 9/11 truth and justice?

Looking eastward along Duane Street past Broadway and Foley Square where the old federal courthouse
for the United States Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York rises in the background. This is
where Judge Michael B. Mukasey presided before becoming the United States Attorney General on 9 November 2007. To the
right is the home of the Fire Department of New York's Engine 7 Ladder 1 Companies. Out of sight, and four tenths of
a mile to the rear right, is the World Trade Center complex.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #05
ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY2 JULY 2008

Mr. Attorney General, can you not
admit that there is at least a shadow of a doubt over the official story of 9/11? Our Commander in Chief said he saw
the first hit on WTC 1. We have no credible airport video surveillance tapes of any of the passengers and no explanation.
We have demonstrably bogus cell and airphone calls. We have two flights with trajectories into their targets which are
consistent with rocket science and not the maiden voyages of flight students.

The most compelling evidence, however,
is a video of the collapsing Twin Towers and World Trade Center 7, which Richard A. Siegel filmed from across the Hudson River
on a pier in Hoboken. The explosions that you hear on the soundtrack preceding each building collapse correspond with
off the chart seismic readings from Columbia University's Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory in the Palisades. The free
fall speed of these building collapses and at least a dozen other aspects of these collapses, as described by Architects &
Engineers for 9/11 Truth, are strongly indicative of controlled demolitions. Moreover, the strong smell like that of
an electrical fire which lingered in the air in our neighborhood on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, and which neighbors,
merchants and doormen remember to this day, is a characteristic of a nuclear detonation. Even though we were constantly
windward of Ground Zero and 6.8 miles away, this smell lingered for weeks!

At right is a still taken from Richard A. Siegel's original film footage which he has reproduced in
its entirety on a DVD entitled 911 Raw The Research Edition. The image shows both Twin Towers still standing and smoking
at the tops as well as at ground level. Siegel's camera was set on a tripod on a pier in Hoboken, New Jersey, on the
western shore of the Hudson River. The sounds of massive explosions are clearly heard right before each tower fell at
nearly free fall speed. These explosions correspond perfectly with split-second off-the-chart spikes on seismic readings
taken further north along the western shore of the Hudson at Columbia University's Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory in the
Palisades of New Jersey.

Such strong
prima facie evidence of controlled demolitions raises the likelihood that the real
perpetrators of these horrific crimes had access to the World Trade Center through corporate and/or government entities.
It behooves you to obtain Siegel's original video footage as well as the superb documentaries he has made on 9/11 at his website
http://www.911raw.com. Likewise, your responsibility to use all due diligence to solve the
crime of this young century makes it imperative that you visit and study the excellent website of Architects & Engineers
for 9/11 Truth at http://www.ae911truth.org.

Let's together end the conspiracy of silence and face unwelcome
facts.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #06
ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY7 July 2008

Referring to my previous letter (#05) in which I introduced Richard A. Siegel's film footage with audio component
as best evidence of controlled demolitions to bring down the Twin Towers and WTC 7, I now ask you, Mr. Attorney General, have
you ever seen this film before? Have you ever even heard of it before last week when I wrote to you about it?
How is it that all the legal proceedings with respect to 9/11 in the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New
York, where you presided as judge before becoming Attorney General, are devoid of any consideration of this open source, primary
evidence casting substantial doubt on the findings of the 9/11 Commission?

I somehow sense a powerful combination
to obstruct justice. Perhaps a United Nations International Independent Investigation Commission will give Richard A.
Siegel's films (http://www.911raw.com) the proper treatment that they deserve nearly seven full years after 9/11.
As already stated in my previous letter, the sounds of explosions correspond perfectly with off-the-chart spikes on the seismic
record. How did you miss this? How can you keep on missing this?

Additionally, we have numerous and
reliable eyewitness accounts of explosions inside the WTC on 9/11. A trusted colleague heard two loud bangs at the beginning
of the attacks. This evidence is corroborated by the heroic custodian of WTC 1, William Rodriguez, who heard and saw
the effects of a powerful explosion in the sub-basement level of WTC 1 immediately before the impact of the first jet.
A tape recording of a conference in Liberty Plaza picked up the two loud bangs which came seconds apart. Port Authority
of New York & New Jersey Police communications transcripts are replete with testimonies of explosions in the sub-basement
level at the beginning of the attacks. (see http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/pa-transcripts) Look at Richard Siegel's film footage and you will see ground level
smoke well before the towers fell. I could go on and on, but there is not enough space. Suffice it to say, Osama
bin Laden and cohorts had no access to place the charges!

Text of fax
broadcast:OPEN LETTER #07 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY10 July 2008

Yesterday's Senate passage of the new FISA law granting retroactive immunity to, among others, the Israeli telecommunications
firms Amdocs and Comverse, is a direct blow not only to our Fourth Amendment, but to efforts to get to the full truth of what
really happened on 9/11. I will return to this topic in future letters, but for now, suffice it to say that Article
I, Section 9 of the Constitution of the United States prohibits such "ex post facto Laws" without
exception. So just as the US Congress disregards international law, it is totally unhinged from our "supreme Law
of the Land" as well.

Once you can get past the denial stage and reckon fully with unexplained lack of routine
airport video surveillance evidence on 9/11, abundant evidence of controlled demolitions, bogus cell and airphone calls,
high tech phone impersonations, remote control of aerial vehicles and our fearless leader's claim he saw the first hit on
the north tower, WTC 1, you have to consider the likelihood that our corporate, government and military organizations were
penetrated and compromised. The real perpetrators carried out a false flag intelligence operation designed to put the
blame on Moslem Arabs and give a green light to put American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol.

Once you can entertain
this false flag intelligence operation theory, you have to consider who had the motive, means and opportunity to do the crime
and cover it up. This has not been done.

The Zionist state had the motive, means and opportunity to carry
out this false flag intelligence operation, but a deeply rooted cultural taboo against blaming Jews makes a full, fair and
impartial investigation of 9/11 a very, very difficult proposition.

Photo at left shows sunlight on facade of the Kehilath Jeshurun Synagogue on Manhattan's Upper East Side. Attorney General
Michael B. Mukasey is a member of this synagogue. Influential right wing Zionists like Benjamin Netanyahu and Ariel
Sharon have visited here for Sabbath and Holy Day services. This writer heard Senator Joseph Lieberman give a speech
here. Though he has never attended a Purim service here, this writer has
little doubt this is where Iranian President Mahmood Ahmadinejad gets his designation as the new Haman for all seasons, which
of course sets the bellicose tone in the Congress of the United States. Read about Haman in the Book of Esther.

Benjamin
Netanyahu stated that the 9/11 attacks were "good for Israel." Benjamin Netanyahu visits your synagogue when
he's in New York. I've been in your synagogue a number of times. I live nearby. Of course the Talmudic Law
of the Moser weighs very heavily on my mind. This law prohibits a Jew from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew,
directly or indirectly, and impinges on our legal, law enforcement and intelligence communities.

Update February 2014:
Yet another illegal ex post facto law was soon to be made to allow Senator Hillary Clinton to become Secretary of
State after she had been disqualified for this position when the Senate increased its salary. Even though I was her
constituent at the time, Senator Clinton ignored all my attempts to communicate with her about these letters on 9/11 to the
Attorney General, copies of which she regularly received by fax. Also, the Hebrew word Moser means an informer.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #08 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY14 JULY 2008

Let me continue, Mr. Attorney General, with the topic of the Talmudic
Law of the Moser. But first, I ask, why do you suppose Americans are preoccupied with alleged fake photos of
Iran's most recent missile defense exercises, but have no curiosity whatsoever about total lack of 9/11 airport video surveillance
evidence from Boston's Logan and Newark's Liberty International Airports? Are they just dumb? Did Osama bin Laden
take these tapes to his hideout? Or is the news & entertainment media creating a protective bubble for the real
9/11 conspirators? Why can't we see these tapes?

Anyway, most people have never heard of the Talmudic Law
of the Moser, and would be very surprised to hear that it is exactly like the Mafioso Code of Omertà.
Back in the time of JFK, FBI Director Hoover denied the existence of the Mafia even though he enjoyed lucrative intercourse
with top capos like Frank Costello. Not until Joe Valacchi broke the Code of Omertà did we find out
enough about the Mafia to engage in vigorous prosecutions. We are dealing with the same thing with this Talmudic Law
of the Moser, which prohibits a Jew from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew. This prohibition extends beyond
being a "rat" or a "fink"; in more subtle and indirect ways the Law of the Moser enjoins adherents
to maintain a conspiracy of silence so as not to draw unwelcome attention to a secret and illegal enterprise or other criminal
or anti-social behavior. (See http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html)

Clearly such a covenant among Jews to protect their own with
a wall of silence is diametrically opposed to the adversarial process of our legal system. Wouldn't you agree?
Wouldn't such a covenant compromise law enforcement and intelligence operations as well as legal proceedings? Perhaps
an FBI agent or a counter intelligence agent or a prosecuting attorney might conveniently see the wisdom of "not going
there" in a particular aspect of a case. On 9/11, ICTS-International oversaw security at Boston's Logan International
Airport. ICTS was owned and operated by Zionist Jews with intelligence backgrounds. Does the Law of the Moser
explain missing video evidence?

Stephen M. St. John

http://www.show-the-house.com

Update September 2013: According to Wikipedia, the
Luciano crime family capo Frank Costello was also a close friend of syndicated columnist and freelance writer John
Miller, the father of the current CBS News senior correspondent (and former FBI official) John Miller, whose godmother was
Costello's wife. It's interesting how crime and entertainment stay in the family, and how the opium trade in Afghanistan
was quickly revived after the Taliban had nearly erradicated it before 9/11!

Text of fax
broadcast:OPEN LETTER #09 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY17 July 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,

I
just returned from a visit to Rockefeller Center where I checked my mailbox and was very disappointed to find that you have
yet to respond to any of my open letters on 9/11! Let me point out to you that these open letters are sent by fax and
email to, among others, nearly every embassy in Washington and mission to the UN here in New York. So I can truly say
the international community is witness to my quest for truth and justice with respect to 9/11.

So let me ask you, am I asking for the moon by asking you repeatedly to show video surveillance evidence of ANY of the passengers
at ANY of the three airports from which the ill fated flights of 9/11 are said to have departed? Short of that, am I
asking for Uranus when I ask you for an explanation as to why we cannot see such evidence in the form of routine airport surveillance
videos?

My boss, a federal employee with the US Department of Commerce, was reportedly on Flight 93 out of Newark's
Liberty International Airport. Why have I never seen video surveillance evidence of her anywhere inside Newark Airport?
Why have my requests to see such proof been ignored for so long? After nearly seven full years, can we not conclude
that there is something radically wrong about the official investigation of 9/11? I know I never saw my boss again after
9/11, but I do not believe a single word about what supposedly happened to her and whoever else was on Flight 93. Certainly
the cell phone call my boss reportedly made from Flight 93 was absolutely impossible to make, and impersonation by digital
voice morphing is the best explanation.

As a Federal Judge, Mr. Attorney General, surely you are aware that tampering
with or withholding evidence is a very serious offense. I want you to answer my questions. If you don't answer
them, I will be forced to conclude that you are obstructing justice on behalf of the man who appointed you Attorney General,
the same one who twice said he saw on a TV monitor the first jet hit on the north tower WTC 1, the hit that took the world
by surprise. Let the international community be my witness!

Update September 2013: Again, by way of clarification, I note that the surveillance video
of alleged 9/11 hijackers at Washington Dulles International Airport lacks a time stamp and is therefore worthless as evidence
of their having been there on the morning of 11 September 2001. The quotation at the bottom is from the Book of
Ezekiel 38:14. I introduce it because I believe that knowing the difference between Sephardic Jews and Ashkenazi
Jews is vital for understanding the turmoil in the Middle East. The link is to my article Ersatz Israel in
which I explain the basic difference between Sephardic Jews and Ashkenazi Jews.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #10 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY21 July 2008

Dear Mr.
Attorney General, "Shock & Awe" did not begin in Baghdad on 19 March 2003; rather, it began on 9/11 and continues
with British bombers dressed as Arabs, two of whom were caught in the act by the Iraqi police in Basra on 19 September 2005.
So how did this "Shock & Awe" tactic originate? How does it continue to promote the "Grand Chessboard"
strategy (otherwise known as the Zionist Neoconservative ideology of world domination) with invasions of the Middle East?

In January of 2004 former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill revealed President Bush's intention of putting American
muscle on Mesopotamian patrol, which he expressed at his very first high level meeting in February, 2001, more than six full
months before 9/11. President Bush's thoroughly illegal intention to initiate aggressive war in the Middle East had
been totally disguised during his 2000 presidential campaign. Inasmuch as 9/11 presented Bush with an opportunity to
go ahead with his plan, would it not be logical to examine the President's Foreign Affairs adviser during that presidential
campaign? Has the Department of Justice ever interrogated that man, Dov Zakheim?

Exactly one year before
9/11, Zakheim signed a document published by the Project for the New American Century which suggested that "a new Pearl
Harbor" would help speed the implementation of its stated goal of global military dominance. Is this not evidence
enough that Zakheim and his Zionist Neoconservative peers were prompting Bush toward invasion and occupation in the Middle
East? Is it not apparent that their plan required secrecy at least until Bush occupied the Oval Office? Don't
O'Neill's revelations suggest the possibility that the "new Pearl Harbor" of 9/11 might have been staged as a false
flag intelligence operation to create a pretext for war? And when you consider that at least two of the aerial vehicles
involved in the attacks exhibited trajectories more in keeping with guided missiles than flight students on their maiden voyages,
wouldn't Zakheim's background in remote control and missile technologies be deserving of close scrutiny? Answer!

Please visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id8.html and scroll to fax broadcast for 17 September 2006 for more information on
British bombers in Basra, and 3 March 2008 for Paul O'Neill's testimony.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #11 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY24 July 2008

So let
me recapitulate already, Mr. Attorney General. George W. Bush took on Dov Zakheim as foreign affairs advisor in his
2000 presidential campaign and in September of that year the Dovster endorsed "a new Pearl Harbor" as a catalyst
to achieve desired transformations conducive to the Zionist Neoconservative ideology of world domination. A year later
President Bush saw on TV in real time the first jet plow into the north tower WTC 1, which began the "new Pearl Harbor"
of 9/11! Richard Siegel's film captures sounds of explosives that correlate perfectly with off the chart spikes on the
seismic record. Cell phone calls from the hijacked planes are technically not possible and impersonation by real time
digital voice morphing offers the only plausible explanation. A DoJ trial exhibit indicates Barbara Olsen's airphone
call did not connect, and that her husband Ted's rendition of his conversation with her is sheer fabrication from the Solicitor
General. And the flights hitting the Pentagon and the south tower, WTC 2, had high speed, arcing and descending trajectories
more in keeping with remote controlled missiles than flight students on their maiden voyages.

The last item causes
me to wonder about Zakheim's background in remote control missile technology from his years spent with System Planning Corporation.
Did the FBI identify all known human beings on this planet Earth with expertise in the area of remote control of aerial vehicles?
If so, what criteria did the FBI use to narrow the range of suspects? May I review the findings?

In addition
to his longing for "a new Pearl Harbor" and his membership in the small universe of individuals capable of remote
control of aerial vehicles that perform aerial acrobatics such as what was witnessed on 9/11 over New York harbor and Washington,
Dov Zakheim was Comptroller of the Pentagon in the weeks and months leading up to 9/11. The very day before 9/11, his
immediate boss, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, announced that the Pentagon could not account for $1.2 trillion.
Motive, means and opportunity converge between the ears of Dov Zakheim!

OPEN LETTER #12 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY27 July 2008

I ask you, Mr. Attorney General, are the Russians and Chinese really behind President Bush as he ratchets up the
pressure of sanctions on Iran in the Security Council?

Or, remembering Belgrade in 1997, do they want to see how
their supersonic missiles perform in Iranian hands against unwanted occupation forces in Mesopotamia and the Persian Gulf?

And what devil is behind
this buildup of tensions conducive to war?

The Iranians, who conform perfectly with NPT and IAEA obligations, are being asked to explain documents on nuclear
weapons studies of unknown provenance given from unknown sources to the IAEA, or else face sanctions and pressures conducive
to war. How unfair!

After the lies about 9/11 and WMDs in Iraq which resulted in unjustified and illegal
invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, do I see a pattern here?

Are we witnessing more of the same
full spectrum fraud and force according to the nefarious goals of the Grand Chessboard cliques and the Zionist Neoconservative
special groups?

Isn't secret evidence, like the wall of silence imposed by the Talmudic law of
the Moser, diametrically opposed to truth and justice and the real American way?

The 9/11 Commission saved
the world from tons of paper by abbreviating the name Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to KSM. But its fixation on KSM produced
nothing more than hearsay; this guiding star of the 9/11 Commission did not provide even a scintilla of evidence showing 19
Arabs hijacked planes on 9/11.

Not only have we never seen ANY credible airport video surveillance evidence of
ANY of the passengers -- let alone the 19 hijackers -- we have never had the opportunity to hear KSM speak. This is
outrageous!

And to top it all off, our praxis of evil exported the bogus official account of 9/11 with "substitute testimony"
of KSM from New York to Germany where a court -- just following orders -- overturned Munir Motassadeq's two successful acquittals.

The Iranians, whose nuclear particle physicists now tread the paths made by Heisenberg, have no problem figuring
out the strange 5+1 configuration at the UN's nucleus, where such critical mass voids justice and peace.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #13 ON 9/11 TO THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY29 July 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,

Let me fast forward from one Zionist with motive, means and opportunity to pull
off a false flag operation like 9/11, Dov Zakheim, to another, Larry Silverstein. Now that we know from Paul O'Neil
that President Bush said in so many words "find me a way to go into Iraq" in early February 2001, we only have to
follow developments to see what really happened.

Yet another Zionist and high level Republican Party functionary,
Lewis Eisenberg, also headed the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, which owns the World Trade Center complex.
The Twin Towers were considered to be "White Elephants" because they were beset with many problems, including the
very costly legal requirement of asbestos removal. Among those concerned, this general condition was known for years.
And as winter turned to spring in 2001, Eisenberg sought to lease the WTC to Silverstein. Lucky Larry promptly took
out insurance against terrorist events when the deal was done, and a 49 day countdown started toward fulfillment of President
Bush's command to "find me a way to go into Iraq."

During this seven week interval before 9/11, there
were reports of powerdowns and evacuations of entire floors as engineers and workmen performed tasks that, in hindsight, appear
to have involved the planting of explosive charges to demolish the buildings. Witnesses have come forward and their
testimonies are known even though they were assiduously avoided by the 9/11 Commission. Was 9/11 Commission Executive
Director Philip Zelikow, yet another Zionist, imposing a wall of silence to protect a Zionist operation according to the Talmudic
law of the Moser? Did Zelikow hide Zionist fabrication of a casus belli?

I have Lucky Larry's
unlisted home phone number but he did not respond to a message I left for him. I have the Dovster's home and business
numbers and he, likewise, chose not to respond to my messages. Will you, Mr. Attorney General, give me a mandate to
conduct an effective investigation of 9/11? I can assure you, sir, that I have been thoroughly inoculated against the
qualifications!

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #14 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY3 August 2008

Dear Mr.
Attorney General,

The World Trade Center was a beacon on the far horizon for travelers coming from as far away as the Tappan Zee and
the Garden State Arts Center. If the war on terror were real, the best response would have been to rebuild the Twin
Towers the way they were as quickly as WTC 7 was rebuilt.

But the real war is on our civil liberties, and an open
wound lingering at ground zero serves the cause in spades, as though to make that dreadful morning of 9/11 last.

Long ago my grandfather would walk each workday across the Williamsburg Bridge in the morning twilight to open Meckel's
grocery store on Rivington Street on the Lower East Side of Manhattan. This is where the FBI, sipping fresh coffee with
their Devil Dogs, would stake out the Rosenburgs, our Zionist buddies who passed nuclear weapons plans to the Soviet Union.
Then the whole block was raised to make way for public housing. Only a backyard tree remains near the mailbox in the
park inside the Samuel Gompers Houses complex.

Change happens, and we must deal with it.

So how exactly
did the World Trade Center metamorphose into a patriotic symbol and rallying point for unjustified invasions and occupations
in the Middle East?

How is it that the all too new tenant Larry Silverstein and not the owner, the Port Authority
of New York and New Jersey, took out the insurance policy against terrorism?

How is it that one Zionist, Lewis
Eisenberg, offered this sweetheart deal involving the public trust to another Zionst, Lucky Larry Silverstein, in the weeks
and months after President Bush, according to Paul O'Neill, said "find me a way to go into Iraq"?

And
in the 49 day countdown from this unprecedented deal to 9/11, why all the heavy activity of engineers and workcrews necessitating
powerdowns and evacuations of whole floors, as witnessed by Scott Forbes of Fiduciary Trust? Why did the 9/11 Commission
ignore him after he tried to contact them?

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html to read about the Talmudic law of the Moser, which prohibits a
Jew from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew, directly or indirectly. This would include not following a lead or otherwise
ignoring key evidence in a crime. The Talmudic law of the Moser, like the Mafioso code of Omertà,
explains the difficulties we've encountered in law enforcement, intelligence, the judiciary and the news media.

Stephen
M. St. John

http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013: My mention in this letter of my grandfather's store
on the Lower East Side of Manhattan where the FBI would stake out the Rosenberg spy ring evidently made waves
bringing a message in a bottle. Weeks later, Morton Sobell
confessed that he and Julius Rosenberg were indeed spies for the Soviet Union after decades of
denial and claims of innocence. The matter was published in the New York Times
of 11 September 2008, the seventh anniversary of the shock &
awe cybernetic piracies known as "9/11"! The timing of the article http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/12/nyregion/12spy.html?pagewanted=all suggests to me a powerful reminder -- conveyed silently between the lines -- of the efficacy
of the Talmudic law of the Moser.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #15 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY5 August 2008

Let me,
Mr. Attorney General, recapitulate already:

Our fearless leader who said in early February 2001 "find me a way
to go into Iraq" and who appointed you in 2007 says he saw on live TV the first jet hit WTC 1;

there is
no credible video surveillance evidence of ANY of the passengers including hijackers at Logan, Liberty or Dulles airports;

Richard Siegel's film records controlled demolitions of the Twin Towers and the explosions -- not the collapses of
buildings pulverized in mid air -- match off-the-chart seismic readings and observations of numerous witnesses;

two jets
are flown like remote controlled missiles into WTC 2 and then the Pentagon;

and all of this follows a
49 day countdown after Larry Silverstein consummates a highly unusual deal with the Port Authority, loads up on insurance
coverage and oversees highly suspicious engineering throughout the WTC.

There is a Zionist connection throughout
all of this, and the Talmudic law of the Moser very likely explains why the 9/11 Commission and the insurance companies
ignored, or were led to ignore, all of these facts and circumstances.

Bibi Netanyahu, who visits your synagogue
whenever he's in New York, says 9/11 was "good for Israel." Was there something brewing before 9/11 that Netanyahu
considered "not good for Israel"?

Was there another countdown besides Silverstein's 49 day
wait?

The annual Judicial Conference met briefly at the Supreme Court on the morning of 9/11 before the US Marshall
evacuated Chief Justice Rehnquist and two dozen of the most senior federal judges in the USA through a side entrance.

Hanging
in the balance in the months and weeks leading up to this Judicial Conference was a potential public relations disaster for
the Zionists; namely, the distinct possibility that my petition/complaint of judicial misconduct before the Judicial Council
of the 11th Circuit in Atlanta would be brought to the attention of the Chief Justice and the twenty four chief judges.

The subject matter within the complaint pertains to the Zionist attack on the USS Liberty, the nearly simultaneous
taking of the Golan 1 2 3, and the question of peace in the Middle East.

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id18.html to read petition/complaint of judicial misconduct file pertaining to the
attack on the USS Liberty, the nearly simultaneous taking of the Golan 1 2 3, and the question of peace in the Middle
East.Large file loads slowly. Be patient!

Stephen M. St. John

http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013: The USS Liberty story is the missing piece of the Middle East peace puzzle. The troubles in Syria
today reflect the USA's failure to learn the lesson of the USS Liberty
incident. Seehttp://www.show-the-house.com/id5.html.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #16 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY10 August 2008

Dear Mr.
Attorney General, as I pointed out in my previous letter, in addition to Lucky Larry Silverstein's 49 day countdown to 9/11
after acquiring Ground Zero, there was another countdown to the 9/11 Judicial Conference where my petition/complaint
relative to the USS Liberty cover-up could very well have been raised had the meeting continued without interruption.
Such a development would have been a great victory for the USS Liberty Veterans Association and a public-relations
disaster for Zionists everywhere. Their war crimes would have been uncovered.

This would not have been the
first time a big Zionist "event" stole the thunder of the USS Liberty survivors' just cause. The
unprovoked "war of choice" against Lebanon in June of 1982 made the headline of the Los Angeles Times,
thereby pushing to a lower corner of the front page a report on the very first reunion of the USS Liberty Veterans
Association. So from my unique point of view, you must understand, 9/11 spun the USS Liberty story as much
as it spun the nation's mood to fight for the Zionists and their psychopathic Neoconservative "Grand Chessboard"
ideology of world domination. With no USS Liberty lessons learned, Americans have difficulty grasping all of
9/11.

Once you accept the logic of 9/11 as a false flag intelligence operation to manufacture cause and consent
for war, you will see a similarity in the USS Liberty story. First, a huge explosion had to be set off in Zionist
occupied Al Arish in order to place a suspicious and threatening aura on the unarmed ship, which then became the occasion
for an unlikely series of errors leading to the attack. Everything hinged on that explosion, both the deliberate attack
to conceal the true nature of the Golan operation, and all the contrived explanations that followed. And, of course,
our foreign policy for the past seven years has hinged on the events of 9/11, especially the explosions resulting in off-the-chart
spikes on the seismic record, the kind of explosions which required inside access to the targets. In other words, an
inside job! Not the Arabs, but those who would have us fight them.

Update January 2014: Again, I say that with no USS Liberty lessons learned,
Americans have difficulty grasping not only all of 9/11 but also the Realpolitik behind the current aggression against
the Syrian Arab Republic. Please seehttp://www.show-the-house.com/id5.html.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #17
ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY14 August 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,

While I persist with these unrequited letters urging you to appoint me to head
a proper investigation of 9/11 for the sake of historical truth and the pursuit of justice, let us together be mindful of
those who have given up all hope that the "proper authorities" will ever heed their demands for answers to thousands
of questions about 9/11.

In this regard I am happy to report that a group of concerned citizens has organized an
initiative to place a referendum on New York City's November ballot which calls for the establishment of a new and improved
Commission to conduct a proper investigation of the events of 9/11.

Their success in this truly patriotic endeavor
looks very likely for this November's General Election or possibly next year's Mayoral Election. Their website address
is http://www.nyc911initiative.org; their phone number is 646 537 1755.

So, Mr. Attorney General,
if you really don't know whom to call to start a real investigation of 9/11, I, your neighbor right here on the Upper East
Side of New York, invite you to sign our petition to place this 9/11 referendum on the ballot.

If you have ghosts
at the Department of Justice and you really don't know whom to call, then join our effort to establish a "proper authority";
namely, a Citizens of New York 9/11 Commission.

Just call me when you're back home and I'll be right over to get
your signature. Or, if you like, I'll take the shuttle down to Washington and meet you there.

I just want
you to know that if this Citizen's 9/11 Investigatory Commission is indeed formed and successfully concludes its work and
achieves its stated goals, it will have done so despite the established proper authorities; namely, you and the US Department
of Justice.

You of course can turn this around right now and start a proper investigation yourself. I just
want to serve notice that your opportunity to do so is now.

So let's begin. Where are the routine video surveillance
tapes showing ANY of the passengers let alone hijackers at Newark's Liberty International Airport?

After seven
years, why haven't we seen the tapes or heard an explanation why we haven't seen them?

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #18 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY18 August 2008

If you
saw Oliver Stone's movie JFK, Mr. Attorney General, you might remember actor Ed Asner's portrayal of Guy Bannister, former
head of the Chicago office of the FBI and then head of the CIA's clandestine operations directed against Castro's Cuba in
the early 1960s.

New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison later discovered that pro-Castro literature being handed
out by Lee Harvey Oswald on the streets of New Orleans in the summer of 1963 had been printed inside Bannister's Camp Street
headquarters. Oswald was being set up to appear to the world as a pro-Castro agitator months before the JFK assassination.

The anti-Castro personnel with whom Oswald worked were preparing the public persona of a patsy. As I point out
in my 2005 letter to Chief Justice Rehnquist, George H. W. Bush and Jack Ruby were instrumental in promoting this false public
persona of Oswald within hours of his arrest. (see http://www.show-the-house.com/id6.html)

Did a similar kind of "sheep dipping" operation take
place in the years and months leading up to 9/11? This question came to mind when I read an excerpt from Mark H. Gaffney's
forthcoming book The 9/11 Mystery Plane & the Vanishing of America, particularly in the passage describing the
intelligence operation known as Able Danger.

Gaffney points out the direction an honest and effective
investigation of 9/11 will take, and affirms the likelihood of foreknowledge of 9/11 within elements of the US military and
intelligence community. This is essential reading for anyone interested in dealing with a colossal miscarriage of justice
and total lack of credible airport security video evidence of passengers or hijackers. (See http://www.show-the-house.com/id60.html)

I suppose the only thing worse than doing 9/11 is doing 9/11
and putting the blame on someone else.

Putting the blame on Arabs is truly a vile and despicable act. This
is true anti-Semitism at its worst.

It takes a praxis of evil to indicate an axis of evil on which to project its
malevolent will. Our Zionist buddies had motive, means, opportunity and a Talmudic code of silence. Let's examine
'em!

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #19 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY22 August 2008

Mr. Attorney
General,

Yesterday's release of the National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) report on the mysterious
collapse of World Trade Center 7 is a classic example of what the founding fathers of the USA sought to prevent happening
in our republic when they included two prohibitions against ex post facto laws in Article I, sections 9 and 10 of
our Constitution.

This lame NIST report rests on the false assumption that there was no existing
agency authorized to investigate Ground Zero in the long interval between the 9/11 attacks and the 1 October 2002
passage of the National Construction Safety Team Act.

Our Congress acted in combination with other officials to
countenance the removal of evidence from a crime scene and thereby thwarted a proper criminal investigation.

Such
corruption supported the goals of the war mongers.

A scientific report teetering on such shaky legal foundation
naturally has as much to hide as it reveals, and I list the notable lies, omissions and unsupported assertions.

Contrary
to what the report says, there were indeed eyewitness accounts of explosions heard and shock waves seen right before WTC 7
went down at 5:21 PM on 11 September 2001.

Not mentioned were numerous testimonies indicating foreknowledge of
the impending implosion, including Larry Silverstein's famous admission that a decision was made to "pull it"; i.e.,
bring down WTC 7 by controlled demolition. How the BBC managed to report the collapse as a fait accompli twenty
minutes before it actually happened remains an unexplained mystery.

Pools of molten steel in the sub-basements
of WTC 1, 2 & 7 remained for seven full weeks, a thermal effect studiously ignored by the NIST nincompoops.

Why
did Mayor Sir Rudolf Giuliani prefer 75 Barclay Street to his expensive, state of the art emergency command post on the 23rd
floor of WTC 7 before any damage was inflicted on the building?

What is the seismic record of the WTC 7 event,
and why are these matters beyond the scope of the report?

What combustable contents or source of energy can induce
the temperature of 900°C that NIST reports?

History shows that severe fires deform but do not collapse steel
structures. How can NIST conceivably make the leap to fire-induced mechanical collapse at free fall speed?

This is nuts!

Please visit http://www.ae911truth.org for thoughtful and apolitical assessments of the WTC building collapses
by professional architects and engineers.

Stephen M. St. John

http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update January 2014: In these letters to Mr. Mukasey
(including one update) we have seen a pattern of illegal ex post facto laws relating to the telecommunications
industry, Hillary Clinton's eligibility to be Secretary of State and NIST's authority to conduct investigations of the WTC
building collapses on 9/11, which rested on legislation sponsored by the then Senator from New York in May of 2002.
This particular letter contains a careless mistake by claiming the seismic record was not in the scope of NIST's report.
Indeed NIST did consider the seismic record, albeit in a way that erroneously ruled out explosions as the cause.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER
#20 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY2 September 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,Let me direct your attention to
my formal comment on the National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) "Final Report" on the mysterious
collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building, otherwise known as World Trade Center 7, at 5:20:42 EDT on the 11th of September,
2001.

The law enabling the NIST
investigation, at least as far as the WTC is concerned, is an ex post facto law. As a federal judge, you ought
to be aware that our Constitution prohibits ex post facto laws. The dynamic behind such legal trickery, of
course, is a combination to suppress the adversarial and discovery processes of our legal system with a thin veneer of authority
from NIST instead of our duly established law enforcement agencies.

This is not the right way to discover what
really happened on 9/11, and it appears to me that this method is meant to protect the real perpetrators of 9/11. It
appears at least on the surface that you had a hand in this in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Did you release the "Dancing Israelis of Liberty State Park"? Did the WTC insurance companies present as evidence
Richard A. Siegel's film of the Twin Towers' collapses?

The only thing worse than doing 9/11 is doing 9/11 and
putting the blame on someone else. That would be a high tech lynching motivated by anti-Arab anti-Semitism.

Moreover, the conspiracy of silence supporting the cover-up reeks of the Talmudic Law of the Moser, which prohibits
a Jew from informing directly or indirectly on another Jew to a non-Jew. Is this not your persuasion? Is it not
true that Benjamin Netanyahu said 9/11 was "good for Israel"?

Since when are those with motive, means
and opportunity to commit a crime, and who actually benefited from it in their own perverse way, not held to account?
How else do you explain palming off on the American people the lies contained in this NIST Report?

The seismic
record clearly indicates blast events coinciding not just with the collapse of WTC 7, but also with the jet impacts and collapses
of the Twin Towers as well.

Stephen M. St. John

http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013: The "Dancing Israelis of
Liberty State Park" are Oded Ellner, Paul Kurzberg, Sivan Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel and Omer Gavriel Marmari.
All five were arrested on 9/11 in New Jersey by officers of the East Rutherford Police Department as reported by the Bergan
Record after eyewitnesses reported their having seen them filming the jet attacks on the World Trade Center in a
celebratory manner. These men were held for questioning by the FBI and finally released in November 2001. Upon
their return to Israel, three of them were interviewed by the Israeli TV journalist Yair Lapid, who is now the Finance Minister
of Israel as of March 2013. During this interview, one of the three, Oded Ellner, admitted to Lapid that "our purpose
was to document the event"; by "event" Ellner meant the attacks on the World Trade Center. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09g5y2BhzCU.

Update January 2014: The appellation "Dancing Israelis of Liberty State Park"
may indeed be an example of Zionist agent Cass Sunstein's "cognitive dissonance" used to create confusion among
9/11 skeptics. New information from Veterans Today places the filming of the 9/11 attacks in New York at the Doric apartment
complex in Union City, New Jersey. Please seehttp://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/01/10/the-dancing-israelis-a-celebration-of-murder/.

In part 5, I note NIST's false and misleading statements:
"Blast from the smallest charge capable of failing the critical column would have resulted in a sound level of 130 dB
to 140 dB at a distance of at least half a mile. There were no witness reports of such a loud noise, nor was such a
noise heard on the audio tracks of video recordings of the WTC 7 collapse."

To this I reiterate my comment
that there were indeed competent and reliable eyewitnesses who heard explosions and saw or felt shock waves from the explosions.
And here I present to you the names of two such witnesses, NYC Housing Authority official Barry Jennings and NYC Corporate
Counsel Michael Hess, and their recorded testimonies in Jason Bermas's 9/11 documentary film Fabled Enemies.(See from
1:19:36 to 1:30:30 at http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=fabled+enemies&hl=en&emb=0#.)

As you are about to hear, both men were in WTC 7 when the Twin
Towers were attacked on Black Tuesday morning.

They made their way to the New York City Office of Emergency Management's
brand new, high tech Emergency Operation Center on the 23rd floor, but were amazed to find it deserted with abandoned cups
of still steaming coffee.

At this point, no steel structured building had ever collapsed anywhere at anytime in
history, and WTC 7 had not been damaged at all.

But as Jennings and Hess made their way down to join the exodus
at ground level, they were turned back by a powerful explosion on the 8th floor. Then they were stranded for about 90
minutes before rescue by the FDNY.

During that time, Mr. Jennings said "all the time I'm hearing all types
of explosions." Neither had instruments to measure decibels, but that does not diminish their testimonies.

Mr. Jennings found the 9/11 Commission to be intimidating. NIST simply continued the pattern of avoidance of testimonies
that did not fit its hypothesis.

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html and learn how the Talmudic Law of the Moser engenders a conspiracy
of silence among Jews against non-Jews, which is a hell of a way to conduct a Warren Commission or 9/11 Commission investigation!

OPEN LETTER #22 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY11
September 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,On this 7th anniversary of 9/11, let us recall the words
of Isaiah:

"And there
shall be upon every high mountain, and upon every high hill, rivers and streams of waters on the day of the great slaughter,
when the towers fall. Moreover, the light of the moon shall be as the light of the sun, and the light of the sun shall
be sevenfold, as the light of seven days, on the day that the Lord binds up the breach of his people, and heals the stroke
of their wound." (Isaiah 30:25-26)

Indeed Muslim indignation made the idea of the 9/11 attacks plausible as blowback,
but were we deceived as to what really happened? Can healing ever preclude truth? Can justice evade the truth
in a conspiracy of silence? Can there be peace without justice?

David Ray Griffin has established himself as a meticulous seeker of truth about
9/11 and is better known around the world than in the USA because of the bridle on the jaws of the people and the press.

Griffin's numerous works on 9/11
are a very worthy template for you to use in a full, fair and impartial investigation of 9/11, and I therefore urge you, as
I urge all Americans, to open your eyes and ears to what this accomplished professor is saying. Inasmuch as the airport
gates of 9/11 are really where the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq began, our national honor demands a rigorous examination
of what actually took place that day, so the truth can be known and justice pursued.

Professor Griffin's recent article Was America
attacked by Muslims on 9/11? demonstrates with Holmesian shrewdness that evidence of 19 Arab hijackers is remarkably
weak. (See http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20722.htm.) A false assumption that led to the destruction of Afghanistan
and Iraq falls apart under his 16 questions.

Fabricated evidence put American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol. We need to deal with
the consequences now.

Griffin has rendered a valuable public service by confronting
unpleasant truths about 9/11. Read The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up,
and the Exposé (Northampton: Olive Branch, 2008).

Stephen M. St. John

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html and learn how the Talmudic Law of the Moser engenders an Omertà-like conspiracy of silence among
Jews against non-Jews, which is a hell of a way to conduct a Warren Commission or 9/11 Commission investigation!

Update September 2013: A subtle reminder of the efficacy of the Talmudic law of the Moser came on the very
same day that I wrote and faxed this letter, which was the seventh anniversary of the cybernetic
piracies known as "9/11." This reminder was in the
form of a New York Times article on Morton Sobell's confession after decades of denial
that he and Julius Rosenberg were indeed spies for the Soviets! See http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/12/nyregion/12spy.html?pagewanted=all. Also, see my previous letter #14 to Mr. Mukasey of 3 August 2008.

Text
of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #23
ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY15 September 2008

I trust, Mr. Attorney
General, that you had a fine 7th Anniversary of 9/11 with your fellow Zionists, some of whom, like Bibi Netanyahu, said more
than once that 9/11 was "good for Israel." It seems he thinks 9/11 was worth it.The Beebster's most recent
memorable quote (16 April 2008) can be read at http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/975574.html. Fawning American politicians beware!A potential public relations
disaster for the Zionists hanged in the balance on the morning of 9/11. For had my petition at the Judicial Council
of the 11th Circuit relative to the USS Liberty cover-up been raised at the annual Judicial Conference, which just
happened to meet on the morning of 9/11, American public support for Israel might have begun to entail certain reasonable
conditions.Instead, public opinion swung madly in favor of the Zionists (i.e., against Arabs and Muslims) even as a federal
marshall evacuated Chief Justice Rehnquist and 26 of the most senior federal judges in the nation out a side entrance of the
Supreme Court building.Mission accomplished! You can read about this on my website at http://www.show-the-house.com/id18.html.And what lengths this PR exercise took!

William Rodriguez, the custodian of WTC 1, heard two explosions, one under his
feet where he stood in the sub-basement, and then another from above, which was the impact of the attacking aerial vehicle.
My colleague and many other witnesses also heard two loud bangs.Then within seconds a co-worker, Felipe David, appeared before Mr. Rodriguez with his flesh hanging from his face,
arms and hands, the result of a fire flash from an elevator shaft. This is the kind of burn wound described at Hiroshima
and Nagasaki.

The explosion preceding the jet impact was a bomb that registered on the seismograph at the Lamont
Doherty Earth Observatory and burned Mr. David all at once. Mini nukes began a process of undermining the steel
core columns of the Twin Towers.

The 9/11 Commission excluded this evidence of high tech war crimes because Osama
bin Laden would not even think to do them.

9/11 was an inside job!

Stephen M. St. John

www.show-the-house.com

Update September 2013: William Rodriguez, the "key man" and heroic
last survivor of the north tower WTC 1, maintains a website athttp://www.william911.com.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #24 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY18
September 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,Short of a full, fair and impartial investigation
of 9/11 by you and the US Department of Justice, or by the US Congress or by a UN International Independent Investigation
Commission, I've been gathering signatures of registered voters living in New York City for a petition to place a referendum
on the ballot for the creation of a citizens' commission of investigation.

I do my canvassing in Central Park at
the northeast corner of the Great Lawn, and there I have met many, many very interesting people. One was the New York
Times reporter Howard O. Stier (rhymes with higher).

There's an expression, the nose knows.
But I cannot think of a better example of opposing noses than mine and Mr. Stier's. He smelled the smell of 9/11 on
the Upper West Side just as I did on the Upper East Side.

Both locations are windward of ground zero, yet this
smell drifted seven miles north against the prevailing winds and, in my experience, as well as my neighbors', lingered for
weeks. I had flashbacks of the Lionel train set of my childhood in the 1950s because the smell of 9/11 was quite similar
to what exuded from the transformer, like an electrical fire.

But Mr. Stier describes the sweet smell of the burnt
flesh of the victims in the Twin Towers! He likened the smell to what he experienced on a visit to a crematorium.
As I listened to Stier, I recalled Frank Sinatra singing, "It seems to me I've heard that song before; it's from an old,
familiar score..."!

It is far fetched to think the scent of burnt human flesh can drift seven miles against
the wind and linger for weeks. And here I recall burn victim Felipe David, whom I mentioned in my previous letter.
Mr. David's burns are very much like those described at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Moreover, the heavy metal smell like
that of an electrical fire is a characteristic of a nuclear detonation. So were the spikes on the seismograph.
And, of course, nuclear bombs now come in all sizes and shapes and colors to suit one's specific need.

Our national
honor requires a proper investigation of 9/11, an inside job requiring access as well as motive, means and opportunity to
start a war against Arabs.

Stephen M. St. John

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id18.html and read how Zionists faced a possible USS Liberty public relations
disaster on the morning of 9/11 but saw the tables turned in their favor right after the attacks.

Update January 2014: In retrospect, and in consideration of Howard O. Stier's apparent
attempt to conflate 9/11 and the Shoah so as to stir emotions, let me be frank. You only need to know three
things to understand the Shoah according to the pure Jewish faith. One, whatever has happened to the Jews,
or will happen to them, for better or for worse, is explained in chapter 26 of the Book of Leviticus. Two,
any other reason given for what has happened to the Jews, or will happen to them, is blasphemy. Three, the word "holocaust"
is a Greek word meaning "a burnt whole" and, because it usually refers in literature to animal sacrifices to a Greek
god such as Zeus or Poseidon or Ares, it is highly offensive to the jealous God of Israel. Furthermore, the holy scriptures
are replete with references to offerings "made by fire, of a sweet savour unto the Lord," which are quite different
from the putative smell of victims at Ground Zero in New York City. Even Elie Wiesel is an agnostic on this point, for
in his book La Nuit, he makes no reference to his olfactory sense at all as he relates how he was forced to walk
amidst pits of burning babies and adult humans.

OPEN LETTER #25 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY

22 September 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,If ever I saw a guilty face, it is the face of Ehud Olmert, who just resigned as
Prime Minister.

But all this business about Morris Talansky is a smokescreen, for both Olmert and Talansky are
closely tied to one Menachem J. Atzmon, the Chairman of ICTS International, the "Dutch" airport security company
that controlled the airport gates where the 9/11 operation – and long laid plans to invade the Middle East – commenced.

And Olmert's former Likud colleague Bibi Netanyahu has said more than once that 9/11 was "good for Israel."

Of course Atzmon's contractual obligations with the airports give his security personnel access and therefore means
to go above and beyond ordinary routine. Perhaps this explains the complete lack of credible routine video surveillance
evidence of any of the passengers – let alone hijackers – at these airports.

Is the Talmudic law of
the Moser behind the thwarted discovery process with respect to this unexplained lack of routine video surveillance
evidence? Did the Mossad do 9/11?

The recent, earthshaking revelation of 91 year old Morton Sobell that he
and Julius Rosenberg were indeed Soviet spies sheds light in all directions.

These "Commies" were all
Talmud Jews adhering to the Law of the Moser. Two weeks before Rosenberg and his wife's execution
on 19 June 1953, your predecessor Attorney General Herbert Brownell sent David Bennett, Director of the Bureau of Prisons,
to offer Rosenberg a deal to cooperate in our government's investigation of their spy ring. Even though such cooperation
would have been solid grounds for clemency, Rosenberg refused.

In his 5 June 1953 letter to his attorney Emmanuel
H. Bloch, Rosenberg summed up his Sing Sing meeting with Bennett: "in so many words he said, only if I become an informer,
do and say things that satisfy the officials in Washington, then they will let us live."(For full text of letter
to to http://192.220.64.45/collections/disputes/sobel-hjc.htm and scroll to Appendix 7.)

Rosenberg preferred death to being
an informer (moser). And he preferred to give the lasting gift of blame on our government even from the grave.

How has the Law of the Moser influenced the 9/11 investigation?

Stephen M. St. John

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com to read online version of this letter to Mukasey which includes a link to Rosenberg
letter to Bloch referenced below.

Update September 2013:
The link to the Julius Rosenberg letter above is corrupted and a replacement cannot be found. However, excerpts from Julius Rosenberg's 5 June 1953 letter to his lawyer Emanuel Bloch appear
on pages 207 - 213 of We Are Your Sons (by Robert & Michael Meeropol, University of Illinois Press, Urbana and
Chicago, 2nd Edition, 1986, Library of Congress call number HX84.R6M43). Although the exact quotation found in the now-corrupted
link does not appear in the Meeropols' book, their excerpts confirm its gist.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #26 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY24 September 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,What a rude and hostile reception
I received today from the snarly FBI ladies when I called 212 384 1000!

I started to say I consider the 19 August
2008 death of Barry Jennings suspicious because the NIST "Final Report" on WTC 7, which was published the very next
day, essentially erases Jennings' outstanding eyewitness testimony of explosions inside WTC 7 on 9/11 by concluding there
is no eyewitness testimony of explosions.

After four attempts, each lasting a few seconds before an abrupt hang
up, I ceased my efforts to penetrate the FBI's 9/11 stone wall.

There are unconfirmed rumors that the then New
York City Corporation Counsel Michael Hess, who accompanied Jennings to the EOC on the 23rd floor of WTC 7 and was stranded
with him inside the building for about 90 minutes, has reversed his testimony that he, too, heard explosions inside WTC 7
on 9/11.

If this is so, then Hess is just like Dr. Malcolm Perry, who three times described a neat round bullet
entry hole the size of a pencil eraser in JFK's throat just above the tie knot at a press conference inside Parkland Hospital
in Dallas at 3:16 PM on 22 November 1963.

Perry very soon discarded his own astute observation when he realized
it did not fit the "three shots from behind" party line.

My calls to Hess (and/or his namesakes in the
directory) have not been returned.

Thanks to the diligence of Jason Bermas, the testimonies of both Jennings and
Hess are preserved in his documentary film Fabled Enemies and thereby continue to rebut the fraudulent instrument published
by the National Institute of Standards & Technology on 20 August 2008. Go to http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=fabled+enemies&hl=en&emb=0# to view Fabled Enemies; the Jennings/Hess testimonies run from the 1:19:36
to 1:30:30 markers.

Update September 2013:
The link above to the documentary film Fabled Enemies is corrupted.
Please tryhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28tE0fKpISMinstead. Update January 2014: This particular letter makes a carelessly
inaccurate claim that NIST ignored the seismic data. Indeed NIST did consider the seismic record, albeit in a way that erroneously ruled out explosions as the cause.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #27 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY1 October 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,A few years ago President Bush famously
ignored Ahmadinejad's letter, and just last week ordered our delegation to leave the UN General Assembly hall when the Iranian
president spoke. (See http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1024097.html.)

Only a praxis of evil cannot come half way to meet the conciliatory
gestures of a putative opponent. Such a praxis of evil seeks to perpetuate enmity by closing the door to peace through
better understanding and mutual respect.

An ideology of world domination by full spectrum fraud and force is behind
this conflict.

Secret evidence is behind the false alarms that keep Iran's file at the IAEA open. As a judge,
you can appreciate how the Iranians are amazed by the IAEA's handling of evidence which the Iranians are not allowed to examine
directly.

These developments keep open the praxis of evil's false pretext to turn its constant threat of force
into action. Ahmadinejad has studied very well this praxis of evil. As he noted in his speech, "These are
the same powers that produce new generations of lethal nuclear arms and possess stockpiles of nuclear weapons that no international
organization is monitoring; and, the tragedies of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were perpetrated by one of them."

Clearly,
the IAEA is not doing its job when it works for the USA rather than on the USA, whose revised war doctrine now permits preemptive
nuclear attack even upon non-nuclear-armed countries.

Moreover, such insanity may very well have been turned against
the American people on 9/11. Again, here are the facts: Felipe David's burn wounds sustained in a split second
flash occurring seconds before the first jet impact on WTC 1 are exactly like those described at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Rick Siegel's video records sounds of explosions immediately before and during the collapses of the Twin Towers, and these
sounds correlate perfectly with recorded seismic events. And my olfactory sense, and those of my neighbors, recorded
for weeks after 9/11 a distinctive smell like that of an electrical fire even though we were 7 miles windward from Ground
Zero.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #28 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY3
October 2008

Our fearless leader, Mr. Attorney General, may no longer be a lame duck, but a dead duck, as the $700 billion bailout
of Wall Street swindlers which he required of the US Congress only underscores the urgent need to redesign our financial system
altogether.

Our warmongering plutocracy rides the waves of the Federal Reserve Bank as a private
entitlement that can be a tsunami to others. In defiance of our Constitution's mandate that Congress issue our money,
the Fed starts us out as debtors.

We need the Fed like we need a hole in the head. That's why
JFK issued Executive Order #11110 on 4 June 1963. It's still on the books and, along with corporate advertising right
on our money, can be the basis for real change.

Mind over matter. Mind over money.
Mind over deficit!

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is using the current financial crisis as
a backdrop for his brazen call for new term limit laws so he can run again in 2009. Bloomberg is a billionaire, which
is admittedly cool, but one must understand that his wealth did not come from making and selling a new and improved widget.

Bloomberg is an alumnus of Salomon Brothers, a principal purveyor of the US public debt. Bloomberg's wealth
grew astronomically as the USA's public debt was foisted onto future generations.

More ominously,
however, Bloomberg's international Zionist politics thrive on keeping raw the wound of 9/11 at Ground Zero as a rallying
point for needless wars in the Middle East. The World Trade Center Twin Towers could have been and should have been
rebuilt by now!

Bloomberg's Zionist politics very likely explain his lack of zeal in presenting
copious evidence of explosions inside the WTC to the 9/11 Commission, just as Philip Zelikow's Zionist proclivities effectively
erased compelling testimonies of explosions by William Rodriguez, Barry Jennings and Lou Cacchioli, among others.

Giving such exculpatory evidence for Osama Bin Laden would have been a violation of the code of silence imposed by
the Talmudic Law of the Moser. Zionists will not transgress Bibi Netanyahu's edict that 9/11 benefitted Israel.

By deception they make war.

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html and learn about the Talmudic Law of the Moser, which prohibits a Jew from
informing on another Jew to a non-Jew, directly or indirectly. This confounds justice!

Stephen
M. St. John

Update
September 2013: Interestingly enough, Bloomberg's former employer Salomon Brothers was a major tenant in World Trade
Center 7, which collapsed at free fall speed in the late afternoon of 11 September 2001 even though it had not been hit by
a jet and had already been reported to have collapsed by the BBC twenty minutes before!

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #29 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY5 October 2008

Mr. Attorney
General,Today's Sunday Times quotes a British commander in Afghanistan, Brigadier Mark Carleton-Smith (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4882597.ece), as saying "We're not going to win this war" and "If the
Taliban were prepared to sit on the other side of the table and talk about a political settlement, then that's precisely the
sort of progress that concludes insurgencies like this."

This, of course, is a classic example of the hubris
involved in waging the wrong war any way. Exactly who invites whom to whose table is a conundrum best considered in
light of the great profundity of Anglo American poet T. S. Eliot (CIA's James Jesus Angleton?): "In my beginning
is my end; in my end is my beginning."

The Taliban deserve a reprise with a UN International Independent Investigation
Commission on 9/11. Put that on the table, John Bull!

Didn't the Taliban offer to deliver Osama Bin Laden
to the USA if evidence could be shown that Bin Laden was indeed behind 9/11?

Didn't President Bush, who says he
saw on live TV the first jet hit on WTC 1, refuse the Taliban's quite reasonable offer? How many died because of this
obstinate refusal?

And what have you got, Mr. Attorney General, to bring to the Taliban seven years later?

You still cannot level with the American people, let alone the Taliban, about the disturbing lack of routine video surveillance
evidence from the airports of 9/11.

You continue to uphold demonstrably bogus air and cell phone calls and attacking
jets with trajectories of remote controlled missiles rather than pilots on their maiden voyages.

You still ignore
and supress copious eyewitness testimonies of explosions in the World Trade Center complex which are corroborated by audio,
video, seismic and other scientific evidence.

You still refuse to consider abundant evidence of foreknowledge and
prior intent to create "a new Pearl Harbor."

You keep the American people oblivious to the oil pipeline
contract the Taliban made with the Argentine company Bridas. (Karl Schwartz has pointed out a conflict of interest among
many principals of the 9/11 Commission with respect to this pipeline.)

You cover for your Zionist buddies even
as our presidential candidates fawn all over them!

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html and learn about the Talmudic Law of the Moser, which prohibits
a Jew from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew, directly or indirectly. This confounds justice!!!!

OPEN LETTER #30 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY9 October 2008 Yom Kippur

Dear Mr. Attorney General,I trust that you have had a good Kol Nidre
ceremony last night, Yom Kippur Eve, and along with other congregants are buoyed by the release of your commitments as per
the Jewish Encylopedia's rendering of the Aramaic into English:

"All vows, obligations, oaths, and anathemas,
whether called 'onam,' 'onas,' or by any other name, which we may vow, or swear, or pledge, or whereby we may be bound, from
this Day of Atonement until the next (whose happy coming we await), we do repent. May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled,
and void, and made of no effect; they shall not bind us nor have power over us. The vows shall not be reckoned vows; the obligations
shall not be obligatory; nor the oaths be oaths."

Indeed, I do hope you understand how I wonder that perhaps
this concept of Kol Nidre, which is not rooted in Torah, may put a kind of asterisk or exception on your
oath or solemn affirmation of federal office, and that this might help to explain why much of the evidence that 9/11 was an
inside job has been shunted aside, ignored and otherwise diminished.

Add to this the benefits that the Zionist
state derived from the events of 9/11, and the conspiracy of silence engendered by the Talmudic Law of the Moser,
and one can readily see how bogus cell phone calls, remote controlled aerial acrobatics, controlled demolitions and Lucky
Larry Silverstein's 49 day miracle cash cow were all sold to the public through the controlled news media as an Arab attack
on our freedoms.

Remember those years, months and weeks leading up to 9/11? Remember how people were living
their lives in the fast lane, exceeding the 55 per day limit on saying the word "terrorist"?

And that was in real life; what about the steady flow of crap out of Hollywood which amounts to psychological conditioning
to the detriment of our Semitic brethren, the Arabs?

Americans were being primed unawares for the main event that
took their blood, money and respect.

But maybe I will be the lucky one who will hear from you now that you have
been released from your apparent vow not to answer.

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id1.html for An Eight Part Peace Proposal for Greater Jerusalem, a truly
democratic and integrated state with one citizenship and one capital with equal opportunity for all.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #31 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY13 October 2008 Happy & Blessed Succoth!

Dear Mr. Attorney General,In consideration of my constant reminders to you of the Jewish state's motive, means and opportunity to conduct a false
flag intelligence operation on 9/11 and Bibi Netanyahu's emphatic claims that 9/11 was "good for Israel," let me
go over the concept of expediency, a word whose adjectival form Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (11th edition)
defines as "suitable for achieving a particular end in a given circumstance" and "usually implies what is immediately
advantageous without regard for ethics or consistent principles."

Setting aside abundant circumstantial evidence
that normally would place Zionists under scrutiny with respect to the events of 9/11, let me go back in history to the death
of JFK for additional insight on this matter.

Mark Lane, whose efforts to discover the truth about the JFK assassination
and to defend Lee Harvey Oswald posthumously are outstanding contributions to the nation, debated Joseph Ball, a lawyer on
the staff of the Warren Commission, at Beverly Hills High School on 4 December 1964.

Also in attendance was the
California ACLU leader Abraham L. Wirin, a friend of Chief Justice Warren, who addressed the audience and said, "I say
thank God for Earl Warren. He saved us from a pogrom. He saved our nation. God bless him for what he has
done in establishing that Oswald was the lone assassin."

To which Lane replied, "If Oswald was innocent,
Mr. Wirin, would you still say 'Thank God for Earl Warren' and bless him for establishing him as the lone murderer?"

To which Wirin responded, "Yes. I still would say so."

Wirin spoke with perfect confidence
that what he had just said would not appear in the news media, a noteworthy circumstance in itself. But Mark Lane's
tape recorder and commitment to history caught up with Wirin. (See Mark Lane's 1991 book Plausible Denial,
page 52)

It may also be that Wirin knew something that Lane didn't at that time (1964), and that history is also
catching up to Mark Lane. Seymour Hersh, in his 1991 book The Samson Option, in chapter 8, A Presidential Struggle,
revealed that JFK was adamantly opposed to the Zionist state's nuclear weapons program, and that there was a bitterly intense
behind the scenes struggle between JFK and David Ben Gurion, and that Ben Gurion resorted to outright lies about what was
going on at the nuclear weapons installation at Dimona in the Negev desert.

Meyer Lansky, a friend of David Ben
Gurion and an integral part of the CIA's Praxis of Evil, was well positioned to take care of the matter and get JFK off the
Zionist state's nuclear file. Interestingly in light of today's contrived controversy over Iran's nuclear file, the
Shah of Iran toasted the news of JFK's death.

But if Americans had only known, these ruthless individuals certainly
would have had reason to fear pogroms! Instead, they bamboozled the Warren Commission staff into thinking they were
saving the USA from a nuclear war with the Soviet Union. By comparison, "Dallas" was a sitcom and J. R. a
cream puff!

Also fearing pogroms were Jack Ruby, who assassinated Oswald to prevent discovery according to the
requirements of the Talmudic Law of the Moser, and his sidekick, George H. W. Bush, whose joint efforts to establish
Oswald's false and misleading public persona as a pro-Castro agitator are described in my letter to Chief Justice William
H. Rehnquist which you can read at http://www.show-the-house.com/id6.html.

1991 witnessed not only the publications of Lane's Plausible
Denial and Hersh's Samson Option, but the more widely observed release of Oliver Stone's movie JFK. Together,
these three masterpieces represent three quarks tending toward a unified whole, with two of them not so subtly suggesting
the CIA was entirely to blame for the JFK assassination, and the third passively providing grounds on which one may infer
a Zionist motive dominating all the other motives to kill JFK. We certainly cannot ignore the end result; namely, the
end of JFK's "two way street" diplomacy conducive to a Middle East free of weapons of mass destruction.

Lane said years ago that he wrote his last book on the JFK assassination, so we can safely assume he will not tread the
path leading to Lansky and the Zionist connection as set forth by Michael Collins Piper in his 1993 book Final Judgment.

Lane's decision appears to be in keeping with the conspiracy of silence enjoined by the Talmudic Law of Moser,
whereby a Jew is prohibited from informing directly or indirectly on another Jew to a non-Jew under penalty of shunning, despoliation
and even elimination. Moreover, the recent revelations of convicted spy Morton Sobell serve to remind Jews of the strong
efficacy of the Talmudic Law of the Moser, which prevented the Rosenbergs from informing on others in their spy ring
when doing so would have been strong grounds for life-saving clemency.

So how do the dynamics of expediency and
a Talmudic conspiracy of silence among Jews affect our considerations of 9/11? Last week I saw Mayor Bloomberg and he
had a worried look on his face. I don't think the financial crisis was foremost in his mind, for Bloomberg well knows
how he helped downplay evidence before the 9/11 Commission of explosions inside the World Trade Center complex, which makes
him and his minions at the very least accessories after the fact.

Will a third term as mayor secure Bloomberg's
fate? The Internet has changed the game since the time of JFK. Now, even Barry Jennings speaks from the grave
about explosions inside WTC 7 on 9/11. Just google "Fabled Enemies" and hear him!

Update September 2013: According to the Associated Press, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., in an interview with PBS
journalist Charlie Rose on 11 January 2013 in Dallas, Texas, told him that his father, Attorney General of the USA Robert
F. Kennedy, did not believe the Warren Commission's "lone gunman" theory and found that phone records of Lee Havey
Oswald and Jack Ruby were like an inventory of Mafia leaders whom the Kennedy Administration had been investigating
prior to the assassination of his brother JFK. Both Rose and Kennedy have yet to learn that, according to Lucky Luciano,
Meyer Lansky was the effective head of the Cosa Nostra as of 1961 and was, as stated above in this letter #31 to
Attorney General Mukasey, well placed to get JFK off the Zionist state's nuclear file.

OPEN LETTER #32 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY16 October 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,Lest
you think I am just another nerd with a monomania about 9/11, let me tell you I am well rounded with other interests touching
our national interest.

My
Hewlett Packard printer is available to make money if Bill Gates can get a franchise for distribution of the Treasury's specialized
printer paper. Just as Harry Truman gave us a chicken in every pot, and Clinton gave us pot in every chicken, I stand
ready to pioneer a mint in every patriot's printer!

Also, I have a keen interest in developing the first casino bank, where the M3 money supply, on which our government
stopped reporting back on 23 March 2006, is the elusive object of wagers and the house loses often enough to preserve plausibility.

I also like a good laugh and
blowing bubbles.

All seriousness
aside, and getting back to 9/11 and the resultant upheavals in the Middle East, Her Tzippiness really ought to hold back on
attacking Iran.

Let's do a
really odious comparison. How many Jews has Ahmadinejad killed? How many Jews has the Livni family killed?

Ahmadinejad has never killed
a Jew and will do so only in self defense. Tzippi Livni's father killed nearly a dozen Jews when he blew up British
Headquarters inside the King David Hotel during a long terrorist campaign that culminated in the creation of the Zionist state.

As she prepares to take over
as the next FM, do we really have to put up with the hypocritical refusal of Zionist terrorists to negotiate with "terrorists"?

Other examples of Jews killing
Jews abound, but I will spare you by not enumerating them. However, I will stress, as I did in my previous letter, the
Talmud's wide latitude for expedient measures and strict code of silence to preserve, protect and defend them.

I've heard rumors that Livni's
boss, Menachem Begin, phoned a warning to the King David Hotel, but it was in Biblical Hebrew and beyond the comprehension
of the Limey who took the call.

On
the other hand, we have proof positive that two employees of the Israeli messaging company Odigo received warnings about the
impending 9/11 attacks two hours before they took place.

Text
of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #33 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY

23 October 2008

Dear
Mr. Attorney General,

Let us please turn to the all-important seismic evidence of the events of 9/11. As previously stated, Richard
A. Siegel's video and soundtrack record explosions seconds before and during the collapse of each of the Twin Towers (See
http://www.911raw.com). Siegel's soundtrack can be calibrated to the 10 AM top-of-the-hour
tone broadcast by 1010 WINS radio station playing in the background, and correlates perfectly with off-the-chart spikes on
Columbia University's Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory seismograph in the Palisades of New Jersey. Siegel's film and
the seismic record together constitute best evidence of controlled demolitions of the Twin Towers.

So why is Siegel's film not a factor in analysis of the seismic record? Why has this best evidence been excluded
from the discovery process in law enforcement and judicial proceedings? And why does the National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST) ignore such dispositive evidence? Even the 9/11 truth movement steers around Siegel's film and
its implications, which is quite an interesting phenomenon in and of itself. (Use of aluminum powder incendiaries to
take down the Twin Towers has been proven quite conclusively by Steven Jones, a leading 9/11 truth figure, but such explosives
do not result in off-the-chart spikes on the seismic record. Thermate and Thermite were used in conjunction with much
more powerful explosives set within the central core columns and at the base of each tower. These high powered explosions
give us a much narrower range of specialized suspects compared with practitioners of aluminum powder incendiaries.)

As
demonstrated in my "Shlock & Awe on top of Shock & Awe" article, NIST leaves out of its report two blast
events, each 0.6 on the Richter Scale, occuring 8 seconds apart precisely when WTC 7 was demolished (See http://www.show-the-house.com/id65.html). NIST's shocking omission came even though such evidence of
WTC 7 blast events is included elsewhere in NIST's literature on 9/11.

NIST and the seismologists
simply do not consider copious eyewitness, audio and video evidence of explosions at WTC 1, 2 and 7, and make the superficially
plausible inference that the building collapses caused the spikes on the seismic record. See Appendix B of NIST NCSTAR
1-9, Structural Fire Response and Probable Collapse Sequence of World Trade Center Building 7, at http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NIST_NCSTAR_1-9_vol2_for_public_comment.pdf.

Likewise do they blindly infer that
the two jet impacts registered on the seismograph; Craig Furlong and Gordon Ross of Scholars for 9/11 Truth argue quite persuasively
that explosions were synchronized with the jet impacts, but the evildoers were off on their timing by a few seconds.
Hence the many reports, albeit suppressed by the media, of two loud bangs at WTC 1 in the opening round of our unjustified
invasions and occupations in the Middle East. See http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/ExplosionInTowerBeforeJetHitByFurlongAndRoss.pdf. Science followed the news media to effect a high tech lynching
of Muslims.

Once the evidence is admitted and not excluded, and the truth sets us free, we
are ready to ask, how could Osama Bin Laden get his men inside Lucky Larry Silverstein's well guarded properties to plant
the explosives? Could 9/11 have happened another way? Have you considered mobbed up unions?

But
seismic data published by NIST presents even more problems insofar that the period from 8:30 AM to 10:00 AM is simply omitted
in the graphic presentations of the 9/11 seismograph. During this 90 minute interval the impacts of the two aerial vehicles
and the collapse of WTC 2 occurred. NIST's graphs inexplicably show seismic evidence only from 10:00 AM to 5:30 PM.

So what is NIST hiding?
We see in its graphs the collapse of WTC 1 and WTC 7 and a few quarry blasts in between during the 7 ½ hour interval
commencing 10 AM EDT. WTC 7 looks like two quarry blasts 8 seconds apart. (Did WTC 7 bounce and fall again?) And
strangely coincidentally, the WTC 1 collapse is lined up with an earthquake in Indonesia at 6.5 on the Richter Scale.
(The seismograph traces 30 minute intervals, so the WTC 1 collapse at 10:28:34 is right on top of the Indonesian earthquake
at 10:56:51.) You'd think at a glance that the 6.5 quake, by jutting off the chart into the other parallel 30 minute
trace intervals above and below, simply occults the beginning of the WTC 1 collapse. (See this graph reproduced at http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html.
UPDATE June 2017 Better yet, go to http://ws680.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=861611 and scroll down to page 662 [728 of 797 PDF])

But wait! On the Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory (LDEO) seismograph there
is another off-the-chart spike just like the 6.5 Indonesian quake, but it's at the very beginning of the WTC 2 collapse at
9:59, which is not shown on the NIST graph, where it would line up with both the WTC 1 collapse and Indonesian quake.

LDEO
(http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_wtc.html) shows a different pattern of 30 minute trace intervals, from 10 minutes and 40 minutes after each hour, which enables the reader to see clearly that the two
off-the-chart spikes coincide with the collapses of WTC 1 and WTC 2. The Indonesian quake is a joker nearly perfectly
timed to overlay the Twin Tower explosions on seismographs with 30 minute traces starting each hour and half hour.

And if you compare the Indonesian quake with one at Fox Islands (17:10:55) at 5.1 on the Richter Scale, you will
begin to fathom the dimensions of our problem. The Fox Islands quake doesn't show any spike at all! And we know
from sources as diverse as the late Internet investigative journalist Joe Vialls (http://www.vialls.com) and former Senator and US Secretary of Defense William Cohen (http://www.fas.org/news/usa/1997/04/bmd970429d.htm) that the USA can cook up an earthquake almost as easily as it can
start an invasion!

You and I both know how the Kingdom
of Saudi Arabia, which from time to time exercises our exorbitantly expensive right of free speech with full page ads in major
American newspapers, could easily settle the question of the identities of the above named alleged hijackers. Doing
so, you would think, would be in the kingdom's best interests. So far I cannot confirm rumors that the Saudi Embassy
in Washington verified that the seven Saudis named above are indeed still alive.

Likewise, the American
Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee and the Arab American Institute (among others) are passive on this subject too, perhaps
wisely so because of the chain of violence in our land. Your Bolshevik distant cousin Stalin could not have done a better
job of enforcing such a conspiracy of silence. (I'm just dying to carry a Homeland Badge for a Homeland Salary!)

So, even though we have no credible airport video surveillance evidence of any of the passengers -- let alone hijackers
-- and no names of alleged hijackers on the airlines' flight manifests, and only bogus cell phone calls and planted evidence
(including a will inside delayed luggage which nobody could have read had there been no delay [duhhh!]), Americans still fail
to see what many around the world clearly see: 9/11 was a false flag intelligence operation allowing the conquering
to conquer.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #35 ON 9/11 TO THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY29 October 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,Let me now
turn your attention again to the flights of 9/11.

As reported on 8 March 2002 by the Portugal News, an English language
weekly published in Portugal, Colonel Donn de Grand Pré (USA, retired), an old Pentagon hand and foremost arms dealer
worldwide, convened a private symposium of military, commercial and civilian aviation professionals from 16 through 19 September
2001. The unanimous conclusion of this group, which was reported to the highest levels in the Pentagon, was that the
news media's story was false and the flights of 9/11 were remote controlled in a highly sophisticated intelligence operation.
See http://www.infowars.com/transcripts/degranpres.htmor read transcript of Alex Jones's interview with de Grand-Pré here.

Other aviation professionals have come forward since de Grand-Pré's groundbreaking
effort to express disbelief of the official story and demand a new investigation. Alan Miller has assembled the statements
of 120 aviation professionals, most with vast military and commercial flight experience, who question the official story of
9/11. See http://patriotsquestion911.com/pilots.html.

Also, pilot Robert Balsamo has assembled
a group of experienced military and commercial pilots and other aviation professionals called Pilots for 911 Truth (http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/). They found that the Flight Data Recorder for AA Flight 77, provided by the National Transportation Safety
Board, shows the craft more than 200 feet higher in the air on final approach at the Pentagon than is stated by the 9/11 Commission,
which invalidates the government's conclusions about what happened at the Pentagon.

They also dispel disinformation
by highlighting a 1964 white paper by WTC designer John Skilling in which he maintains that a Boeing 707 jet colliding into
either of the planned WTC Twin Towers at 600 miles per hour "would result in only local damage which could not cause
collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate
area of impact."

Text of fax broadcast:LETTER #36 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY31 October 2008 Harpy Halloween!

Dear Mr. Attorney General,

It's a pity that Merriam Webster's
Collegiate Dictionary (first through 11th editions) does not list the Hebrew words "moser" (informer,
rat, fink, rat-fink) and "sayan" (assistant, Mossad assistant) just as it incorporates other foreign loan
words. For without these words Americans cannot grasp how their national sovereignty has been usurped by a praxis of
evil. With these words, American history can be rewritten as a redemptive story stranger than fiction.

You know I have made frequent reference to the word "moser"
in previous letters to you. I will soon revise my webpage "The Talmudic Law of the Moser" with examples
from recent history of how this law engenders an unhealthy conspiracy of silence. (http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html.)

I have yet to touch the word "sayan"
and will do so now. I will refer you to a webpage of Christopher Bollyn, a pioneering 9/11 truthseeker whose logical
and intuitive mind has led to original discoveries and penetrating analyses which should guide any real investigation.

Briefly, Bollyn names Michael S. Goff as a likely Mossad helper (a sayan not directly on the Mossad payroll)
at an obscure software company in Massachussetts named Ptech. (See http://www.bollyn.com/index/?id=10761.)

Bollyn maintains that "Mossad,
Israel's military intelligence agency, infiltrated the most sensitive computer networks in the United States through a little
start-up company known as Ptech.... it was this infiltration that allowed the events of September 11, 2001 to occur."
With reference to our suspected sayan, he adds, "Under Goff, Ptech software loaded with trapdoors and Trojan
Horses was sold and loaded onto the MOST sensitive computer systems that failed miserably, or performed well (depending on
your view), on September 11, 2001." These computer systems included those of the Federal Aviation Administration
and US Air Force among other clients of this mysterious IT consultancy Ptech.

Their radar systems were gamed. "9/11 was good for Israel"
says Netanyahu!

I love Jews. They are sinfully delicious and high in protein too. If their high saturated fat content
doesn't make you feel guilty, then flossing certainly will, because you will never hear the end of their complaint that you're
picking on them!

Stephen M. St. John

http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013: I highly recommend Christopher Bollyn's book, Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed the World,
which can be downloaded as a PDF file from his website athttp://www.bollyn.com/public/Solving_9-11_-_The_Deception_That_Changed_The_World.pdf. To readers taking offense at my joke, I offer my apologies. Having never had
a response from Mukasey for so very long a time, my humour - albeit a sardonic kind of humor - escaped me in the Halloween
spirit. To those meanspirited enough to take this joke out of bounds, let me assure them: I eschew cannibals and
the practice of cannibalism in all its forms.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #37 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY5 November 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,Now that was one heck of a repudiation of Republican policies last night, and President-elect
Obama will hopefully find himself free to go into an area studiously avoided by the candidates and the news media; namely;
a full, fair and impartial investigation of 9/11.

Knowing how our military misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq began -- at the airport gates on 9/11, where there
is no credible video surveillance evidence -- is a prerequisite for knowing how to end them.

With respect to 9/11, the resultant invasions and occupations,
and Barack Obama's mandate to bring change, I repeat the words of JFK which clearly and incisively express a chronic problem
that still needs to be solved:

"... We are opposed, around the world, by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence; on infiltration
instead of invasion; on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice; on guerrillas by night instead
of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly
knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations.
Its preparations are concealed not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined, its dissenters are silenced, not
praised; no expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the cold war, in short,
with a wartime discipline no democracy would ever hope to wish to match. ..."

Was JFK talking about the same organization that decades later stole PROMIS software
and used Ptech to load it on government computers including those of the Federal Aviation Administration and US Air Force?

Was this the same organization
that infiltrated our radar system and caused confusion right in the middle of USAF exercises on the morning of 9/11?

Did JFK know that Bolshevism was a
US export from the Lower East Side of New York City to Russia?

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #38 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY6 November 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,Now
let me turn your attention to the anthrax attacks right after 9/11 and the farcical FBI investigation that followed in a veering
three stage pattern.

First,
an anonymously accused Arab-American scientist at Fort Detrick was properly cleared of wrongdoing by the FBI. The cowardly
accuser was stupid enough to reveal foreknowledge of the anthrax attacks. Two reporters from the Hartford Courant newspaper
then put former Fort Detrick scientist Philip M. Zack in the spotlight as a person known to have harassed mercilessly the
same falsely accused Arab-American scientist years before.

Zack was sacked for his egregiously bad behavior, but it can be proved he subsequently had unauthorized access to
anthrax at Fort Detrick. Zack's access to anthrax and his anti-Arab animus jibe well with the Bush Administration's
primitive attempt to blame Iraq for the anthrax attacks even though the White House was well aware the anthrax spores were
weapons grade and could only have come from Fort Detrick.

Have you looked at Zack?

These indications flagging Zack resulted in a two pronged attack on another former Fort Detrick scientist, Steven J. Hatfill;
first by the New York Times and then by the FBI, who, after leaking information, conducted a campaign of harassment that ultimately
resulted, after your tenure as Attorney General began, in a multi-million dollar judgment for Hatfill. Judge Walton
said there was "not a scintilla of evidence" against Hatfill.

How could the FBI and the newsmedia be so wrong?

After all this rigamarole, along came Bruce E. Ivins, yet another scientist at Fort Detrick whom the FBI
harassed mercilessly. Instead of effecting a money judgment for Ivins, the FBI literally drove him to commit suicide
and then confidently announced he was the post 9/11 anthrax man. Ivins' lawyers strongly reject the FBI's conclusion,
yet the newsmedia eagerly gobbled it up.

I certainly hope you see the need to establish and maintain credibility at the DoJ.

Who had personal information about Ivins sufficient to set
him up at the Princeton mailbox where anthrax was mailed?

OPEN LETTER #39 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY12 November 2008Dear
Mr. Attorney General,Americans
who are stupid and stubborn enough to keep believing impossible stories such as cell phone calls from the allegedly hijacked
jets of 9/11 invite an encore by our homegrown praxis of evil.This seems to be the case with the head-on
crash of a Metrolink commuter train and Union Pacific freight train near Chatsworth, California, on 12 September 2008.From
the very outset the press reports did not ring true.Briefly, if the official story were true, then
the commuter train, after having failed to stop at a red light, should have derailed at the switch which was set for the oncoming
freight train to pass. This did not happen.Moreover, if National Transportation Safety
Board member Kathryn Higgins's preposterous claim that the commuter train just "blew through the switch" were true,
then the jolting effect felt at the switch would have been quite sufficient to alert the engineer to stop the train and also
would have been reported by survivors of the crash. And the switch itself should have been damaged by this bizarrely
hypothesized "blew through" transit. But none of this happened.

So
the question naturally arises, Did the engineer see a green light on the ground when the dispatcher saw a red one on his console?
How could this be?

Aerial photo at right from Google Earth at 3,900 feet shows scene
of MetroLink commuter train crash with a Union Pacific freight train at point marked "C." The freight train
emerged from a tunnel at point "A" and the commuter train, heading from Los Angeles to Moorpark, is said to have
passed red lights and passed over a switch (shown at "B") set for the oncoming freight train. But if
this is how it really happened, the commuter train should have derailed at the switch! It didn't! If you are intent
on selling a new and improved "fail safe" signal system to your local railroad, you have to demonstrate a failure
of the system that worked without a serious incident for decades. Then you move in and make your pitch and get your
multi-million dollar contract! PROMIS and PTECH computer software technologies can infiltrate computer systems to monitor
and sabotage them. This is also what happened on 9/11! Sam Giancana would have loved it!

The unlearned lessons of 9/11 will one day clarify
how computer software programs such as PROMIS and PTECH can surreptitiously override whole computer systems of our national
infrastructure to monitor and even sabotage them. Infiltration of our national command, control and communications system
on 9/11, particularly our radar and security operations, served a political agenda.But the Chatsworth crash, which happened at the very moment our financial system became totally
unhinged from the real economy, served financial interests with a totalitarian temperament requiring total control.The railroad's tried and true procedures had kept risk of catastrophic
human error infinitesimally small. Then this mysterious crash greased the skids for an expensive upgrade, an automated
"fail safe" signal system to replace one that works just fine.It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.
Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)Stephen M. St. John

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #40 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY17 November 2008

Did
you ever wonder, Mr. Attorney General, how the mainstream news media can continue to ignore Richard A. Siegel's film (http://www.911raw.com/) capturing the collapses of the Twin Towers, which corresponds perfectly with off-the-chart seismic spikes seconds before
each collapse?

Here are the characteristics of a controlled demolition, all of which
were present at the World Trade Center on 11 September 2001:

Sounds of explosions
heard and felt far and near; sounds of explosions recorded by Richard A. Siegel; off the chart blast events recorded by the
Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University; sudden onset of collapse; flashes seen and recorded inside the buildings;
squibs seen and recorded popping out of windows; mid-air pulverization of concrete and steel into superfine powder; pyroclastic
dust clouds crossing over land and water; symmetrical collapse; free fall speed of collapse with no resistance from below
until ground level; blast waves; lateral ejection of very heavy steel beams as far as 600 feet; total destruction of the buildings;
molten steel lingering in sub-basement levels for up to seven weeks; evidence of military grade thermate in dust samples collected
by residents living near ground zero; evidence of diagonally placed thermate cutting charges on vertical support beams; evidence
of foreknowledge of the collapses among key officials in government and media among others, including Mayor Sir Rudolf Giuliani
and BBC reporter Jane Standley; many bodies unaccounted for; thousands of tiny human bone fragments discovered on rooftops
of buildings adjacent to the World Trade Center as well as in nearby drains and gutters.

Copious
evidence shows that the Twin Towers were designed to withstand multiple collisions of big jetliners. Even in the most
fanciful hypothesis of mechanical collapse due to the effects of structural damage and fire, the collapse should have been
asymmetrical; i.e., the building should have tilted toward the jet's point of impact -- the weakened side of the building
-- and then should have fallen in that direction. Instead we saw a sudden, uniform drop straight down with no resistance
from below.

It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings
is to search out a matter.
Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #41 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY19
November 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,As the Bush Administration draws to a close, let me recommend to
you and all others at the Department of Justice, including your successors there, a truly magnificent Italian film called
Zero: An Investigation into 9/11.

One of the presenters is Dario Fo, a Nobel Prize
winner, whose great élan epitomizes the spirit of the filmmakers. With admirable discipline and ingenuity,
the makers of this masterpiece explain succinctly why the 9/11 Commission Report is so very inadequate. Allow
105 minutes to see this film.

The testimonies of key eyewitnesses, expert witnesses and analysts are paraded before
your eyes in such a way that you might want to put these creative artists on the DoJ payroll. They are not perfect in
that they avoid salient issues like seismic data and Ptech software loading PROMIS software into government computer systems
to monitor and game them, and a few other issues, but believe me, this is a compelling and classic performance!

Speculation
on who sits at your desk come 20 January 2009 hinges on speculation on who will sit in the Oval Office.

President
Elect Obama and the Democratic National Committee are compelled to answer by 1 December 2008 Philadelphia lawyer Philip J.
Berg's petition for a Writ of Certiorari on his unsuccessful District Court challenge of Obama's qualifications.
(Correction: There is no compulsion to answer; rather, the parties were served notice of
Berg's petition and have the option to respond, and if they do, only then must they answer by the date set by the court.)

The issue of Berg's standing to make such challenge ought not consume the little time left before the Electoral College
selects our next president on 15 December 2008, so I have requested that Chief Justice Roberts determine the facts and law
in this matter on an urgent basis, and then advise the Electoral College forthwith. (See http://www.show-the-house.com/id69.html.)

The controlling law for this controversy is found in Article
II, Section 1, Amendment XII and Section 3 of Amendment XX of the Constitution of the USA.

Briefly, if Obama's
paternal grandmother's claim that she witnessed his birth in Kenya in 1961 is true, Obama is not eligible to be President
of the USA.

And if he ever held Indonesian citizenship, he is not even a naturalized US citizen. Bingo!

It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.
Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)

Stephen M. St. John

Website: http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013: After years of consideration of various claims,
I have finally concluded that Barack Obama is not a "natural born Citizen" of the USA simply because his father
was a temporary resident alien from Kenya who returned there when his visa expired. Therefore, according to Article
II, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, Barack Obama was never eligible to the Office of President
of the USA regardless of his place of birth. Blame for this illegality falls on Barack Obama's former colleagues in the United States Senate who were collectively
remiss in their duty under Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution of the United States, which holds that "Each
House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members." Moreover, Sheriff Joe Arpaio's investigators in Maricopa County, Arizona, have proved beyond
any reasonable doubt fraud in the April 2011 posting of Obama's purported birth certificate on the White House website.
Their good work in the public interest will ultimately triumph over the media blackout and distortions imposed on them.
The fear-mongering, war-mongering Zionist Neoconservative Wall Street interests have skillfully used this eligibility issue
as a kill-switch to assure Barack Obama's seamless continuity of the Bush Administration's quest for world domination by full
spectrum fraud and force.

Text
of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #42 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY20 November 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,Few remember or were even aware of the 6 May 1981 crash of a US Air Force EC-135N
under highly unusual circumstances that logically indicate sabotage by remote control. When EgyptAir 990 went down in
a mysterious nose-dive on 31 October 1999, and soon thereafter the press fed us an aerodynamically impossible roller coaster-like
scenario before the jet's final plunge into the deep Atlantic, I put two and two together and came to the conclusion that
both events were acts of sabotage in the interests of the Zionist state. My reasons for saying this are expressed on
my website at http://www.show-the-house.com/id9.html, which includes a link to USAF General Robert Chapman's "Accident"
Investigation Report on the crash of the EC-135N.

Now, having viewed the film Zero http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ, and having considered the testimonies of Russ Wittenberg,
a military and commercial pilot for over 30 years, and Robert Hordon, an Air Traffic Controller at Boston Center for 11 years,
who conclude that the aerial vehicle that hit the Pentagon could not possibly have been flown by flight students on their
maiden voyage, and remembering my colleague's description of the highly unusual attitude of the jet that hit WTC2 as it made
its approach over New York harbor, as pointed out in letter #04 of 30 June 2008 (http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html),
I cannot help but conclude that these aircraft were flown by remote control.

And bearing in mind how these attacks
on New York and Washington fulfilled psychopathic Zionist Neoconservative desires to put American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol,
and how motive, means and opportunity to pull off a sophisticated false flag intelligence operation center on Dov Zakheim
and his ilk, I regard the EC-135N and EgyptAir 990 crashes as precursors to what happened on 9/11.

These events
illuminate each other if you look.

I hope history will show who looked into these matters and who didn't.

Our ghost riders in the sky will have separated seekers of truth and justice from accessories before and after the fact
of 9/11.

It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.
Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)

The AP reported that former Solicitor General Theodore Olson
escorted your wife Susan when the EMS took you to the hospital. You will recall it was his wife Barbara's alleged call
from AA Flight 77 which buttressed the story of Arab hijackers and our inexorable progress into Afghanistan and Iraq.

Ted Olson appears to be less than forthright on this important
matter and has never been held to account. Seeing him with your wife after you fell makes me wonder if there is a closeness
that prevents objectivity on your part. Have you thought of waterboarding this Viking? Was he duped?

Knowing what really happened on 9/11 is to know how we were sent to Afghanistan and Iraq, and knowing how we arrived there
is prerequisite to knowing how to leave.

Having a passive AG will only make the situation worse. Barring
Barack Obama's failure to qualify to be President of the USA (if he was born in Kenya or if he later held Indonesian citizenship),
there is every indication things will not get better.

The Bomb Belgrade Crew is about to replace the Bomb Baghdad
Crew. Our Zionist Buddies will have made their "clean break" and secured "their Realm" while Americans
remain stuck with the Mena Arkansas Drug Cartel.

The superlative documentary film Zero (See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ) shows the Mena Cartel allied with Al Qa'ida in Bosnia a few years after
the UN Charter became a joke on Yugoslavia in 111 parts.

Hitler's dream of hegemony of the Mark from the Baltic to the Adriatic,
albeit in the form of the Euro, disrupted foreign exchange operations, which spurred creation of structured finances
such as derivatives.

Camp Bondsteel in Kosovo and "smaller footprints in Iraq" are but emblems of plunder.

It is the glory of God to conceal a
thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.

Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)

Stephen M. St. John

http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html

Update
September 2013: By the time of Barack Obama's 4 June 2009 speech in Cairo, Egypt, it was clear that he would not challenge
the 9/11 Commission Report. Again, the issue of Barack Obama's eligibility
for the office of President of the United States hinges on the "natural born Citzen" test which he does not meet
regardless of his place of birth because his father was a temporary resident alien in the USA who returned to his native Kenya
when his visa expired. Q.E.D. Also, the USA's alliance with Al Qa'ida in Bosnia during the Clinton Administration
was a precursor to its current alliance with Al Qa'ida in Libya and Syria and the illegal flow of arms from the former to
the latter.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #44 ON 9/11 TO THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY25 November 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,I hope by
now you are fully recovered from last Thursday night's episode of the black vapors.

Barack Obama is fast assembling
a Zionist's "Dream Team" Administration, and Eric Holder as Attorney General will assure the same steadfast inattention
to the many loose ends of the 9/11 Commission Report and anthrax investigation.

My fax broadcast of 03
February 2008 (http://www.show-the-house.com/id8.html) reported on a British investigation that traces the access needed to plant
explosives in the WTC to KPMG in Zug, Switzerland, the home of Marc Rich, for whom Holder bent the rules of the pardon process.

Who pressed Holder's buttons?

On the other hand, the case being advanced by Philip J. Berg -- that President
Elect Barack Obama is not qualified to be President of the USA -- grows stronger by the day. He has already produced
a recording of Obama's paternal grandmother affirming to a Swahili translator that she attended and observed the birth of
our President Elect on 4 August 1961 in Kenya. He has shown that under existing law Obama is not a natural born citizen
of the USA, and therefore is not eligible to be President of the USA.

Berg has also shown documents proving that
Obama, known then as Barry Soetoro, was enrolled in a grammar school in Jakarta as an Indonesian citizen, in which case, under
existing law, he is not even a naturalized citizen of the USA and therefore not eligible to hold any federal office.

Yesterday, Berg posted a video giving expert testimony that Obama's Certificate of Live Birth (not a Birth Certificate)
posted on the Internet is a forgery. You may view this video at http://www.obamacrimes.com/.

Obama's tactic is to ignore Berg, and the news media is complicit.

But for how long?

If another individual qualifies as President, and Berg is Attorney General, a real 9/11
investigation will bypass the CIA's "limited hangout" that will pin mobbed up union members for placing military
grade thermate charges in WTC 1, 2 & 7.

Thermate does not explain the off the chart spikes on the seismic record,
which correspond perfectly with Richard A. Siegel's video.

It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but
the honour of kings is to search out a matter.
Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)

Stephen M. St. John

http://www.show-the-house.com/id1.html

Update September 2013: Although I do not agree
with many of their conclusions, the forensic economists of Hawks Café do provide interesting and important
information including links to Zug, Switzerland, as shown in their
9/11 Resolution Trilogy of documentary films athttp://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL071B4A58D38DD384.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #45 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY30 November 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,As sure as the heavens above are
blue and the good earth below is green, cell phone calls as of 11 September 2001 could not possibly have been made from flying
jets, nor were seat back air phones available on Boeing 757 jets.

So all those stories about cell phone calls and
air phone calls on 9/11 are simply bogus. Continued denial of this hard fact raises moral questions, and the Moussaoui
trial stipulation that such calls did take place raises questions of credibility and incompetence at the U. S. Department
of Justice.

Once you get past the denial, analysis of the alleged calls
will be helpful in a new investigation of 9/11. The verve and alacrity of the press to fill the void of reality required
a combination of imagination and cunning or, in the likely case of telephone and radio impersonations by real time digital
voice morphing technology, gullibility. (As an example of voice morphing, you could call your wife and sound like Daffy
Duck, or she could call you and sound like Congressman Charles Rangel.)

As a former part time Field Representative
with the U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, I worked with New York Assistant Regional Director Marion Britton
for 11 years. I detect a very unlikely story in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette saying, "She called longtime
friend Fred Fiumano, from whom she had borrowed a cell phone." Marion had a Census Bureau-issued cell phone with
her at all times, and if she had trouble with her phone, she could have very easily replaced it when she was in the office
on 10 September.

Whoever impersonated Marion in a call to Mr. Fiumano no doubt
knew the New York office would have been -- or had already been -- evacuated. I was the last one out at about 9:10 AM.

It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.
Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)

Stephen M. St. John

Is President Elect Barack Obama deceiving the world about
his qualifications to be President of the USA? Will the College of Electors learn the relevant facts and applicable
law before they select the next President of the USA on 15 December 2008? See http://www.show-the-house.com/id69.html!

These attacks on 9/11
appear to have been a false flag intelligence operation to justify invasions in the Middle East, and the resultant scale of
human suffering is staggering. Truth and justice with respect to 9/11 are therefore human rights issues.

The
USA's sanctions on Iran are an expression of Zionist driven hostility toward the Iranian nation.

Moreover, sabotage
of Iranian military flights in recent years recalls the mysterious crashes of a USAF EC-135N and EgyptAir Flight 990, where
likely sabotage by remote control just happened to serve the Zionist agenda. These precursors to the remote controlled
flights of 9/11 establish a pattern leading to events that, as Bibi Netanyahu would say, are "good for Israel."
I have explained this in more detail in previous letters and at http://www.show-the-house.com/id9.html.

New high tech weaponry, including sabotage by remote control
or other electromagnetic interference, and telephone and radio impersonation by real time digital voice morphing, leaves little
or no trace of the clever but cowardly criminals who use them. The new challenge of this young century will be prevention
and the ultimate rooting out of these insane and inhumane technologies.

Add to this list sanctions that compromise
the safety of the flying public. These too are insane and inhumane. So insane and inhumane as to amount to terrorism.
It is a form of war imposed by those who seek to dominate the world against any legal, moral and spiritual consideration.

This praxis of evil has not shown routine video surveillance images of any of the passengers at the airports of 9/11,
has claimed these passengers made cell phone calls that are technically impossible to make, and has not shown one piece of
jet debris bearing an identification number.

Totally insane!

It is the glory of God to conceal a thing:
but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.
Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)

Stephen M. St. John

http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013: To clarify,
the surveillance video from Washington Dulles International Airport lacks a time stamp and is therefore worthless as evidence
of alleged hijackers in the Main Terminal on the morning of 11 September 2001. There is absolutely no 9/11 surveillance
video evidence from Newark Liberty International Airport and Boston Logan International Airport.

Text
of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #47 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY5 December 2008

Dear
Mr. Attorney General,Watching Pakistanis watch our Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen flail with
his arms and hands like a conductor of the Boston Symphony Orchestra as he tells them what their next steps are in sorting
out the Mumbai attacks only serves to highlight the rank hypocrisy of the USA in its very suspicious approach to the investigation
of 9/11.

India was quick to show photos and videos of the Mumbai terrorists.

An Indian news photographer
actually latched onto one murderous pair at the railway station and followed them about as he snapped picture after picture
of their carnage from as close as 30 feet away. Talk about symbiotic relationships! They were feeding off each
other!

The prolonged siege by 10 men in a major city against police and military forces is way beyond my understanding,
but nevertheless the prompt, graphic reporting stands in stark contrast to the 9/11 investigation. This is the lesson
to be learned.

Think of it! Seven full years after 9/11 we have yet to see ANY credible video surveillance
images of ANY of the passengers -- let alone hijackers -- at ANY of the three "Category X" high security airports
from which the flights of 9/11 are said to have departed.

Nor have we had any explanation as to why we have not
seen evidence of passengers or hijackers at these airports in the form of routine video surveillance tapes.

We
repeatedly saw on TV two suspects at Portland, Maine airport.

So when I hear Rice and Mullen preach the necessity
of a "transparent investigation" of the Mumbai attacks to the Pakistanis, I find myself halfway between laughing
or crying. That the unjustified, immoral, illegal and ill-advised invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq began at the airport
gates of 9/11 is not lost on the Pakistanis or the greater global community.

Yet Mullen and Rice seem clueless
about the lies, distortions, inconsistencies and omissions in the official account of 9/11.

If they don't know
how they actually came to occupy this part of the world, they certainly will not know how to leave.

Let the USA
practice what it preaches. Let's conduct a real investigation of 9/11!

It is the glory of God to conceal
a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.
Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #48 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY8 December 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,While I lament the
sorry state of our "mainstream newsmedia" others no doubt are quite content with the workings of our "free
press."

Investigative jounalism did nothing to resolve doubts about Barack Obama's qualifications to be President
of the USA which were first raised well before the Democratic Convention. (See http://www.show-the-house.com/id69.html.)

Now that the Supreme Court may soon review cases arising from
this controversy, I hear for the first time from the Associated Press that questions about Obama's place of birth and citizenship
in Indonesia are "conspiracy theories"!

Well, at least we know where the stultification of the American
people begins, and where it will hopefully end.

Of course the newsmedia has done nothing to address seriously the
many loose ends left hanging by the 9/11 Commission. And, as per my previous letter, even comparisons with the Mumbai
massacre did not induce in our Fourth Estate introspection enough to admit the suspicious seven year lack of routine airport
video surveillance evidence of hijackers or even passengers on 9/11.

The same can be said for recent news that
the Indian Foreign Minister denies making a call to the Pakistani president. Yes, we have found that cell phone calls
were impossible to make from flying jets as of 9/11, and that Boeing 757s had no air phones; yet people do say they did receive
the alleged calls that day.

How? By impersonation. How? By real time digital voice morphing,
which would enable, say, the Lebanese singer Farouz to pick up a telephone and sound exactly like Syrian President Bashar
al-Asad.

Is this what happened to the President of Pakistan?

Who'd do that?

We must ignore
the logic of broadcast propaganda and look to the underlying cause and effect. We must consider exactly who has the
motive, the high tech means and the opportunity to deceive for military, political and criminal ends.

Real time
digital voice morphing explains hitherto inexplicable phenomena relating to EgyptAir Flight 990, the attacks of 9/11, the
Hariri assassination and now, perhaps, this bogus call from the Indian FM.

Let's investigate 9/11 so that the truth
will set us free!

It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.
Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #49 ON
9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY11 December 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,According to RIA Novosti (http://en.rian.ru/russia/20081211/118812388.html), Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin today named a mountain peak in the
Caucasus in honor of Russian spies. The Peak of Russian Counterintelligence Agents serves as a reminder that my 18 January
2002 letter from Arthur Schlesinger, which is the first reference to my theory that CIA Counterintelligence Chief James Jesus
Angleton and Anglo American poet T. S. Eliot were one and the same person (indirectly confirmed on 7 April 2003 in Richard
Helms's autobiography where he wrote that Angleton had a "not entirely coincidental resemblance to T. S. Eliot"),
would make a swell Xmas stocking stuffer for the favorite goy on your list. I'm sure a small group of East Coast investment
bankers can chip in from their Xmas bonuses to meet my price of $2,000.000.00. I only want to help juice the economy.

Putin's naming a mountain peak according to the 5 December 2008 proposal of the Parliament of the Republic of North
Ossetia stands in stark contrast to Croatian President Franjo Tudjman's apparently impromptu naming of the site where US Secretary
of Commerce Ron Brown and others perished in a plane crash "St. John's Hill" and, almost in the same breath as I
watched and listened on CNN, "St. John's Field." Due to articles I, Stephen M. St. John, had written suggesting
that the UN Charter had become a joke on Yugoslavia in 111 parts, I wonder what Tudjman was thinking.

My Angleton/Eliot
Same Man Theory promises to rewrite the histories of the Cold War, the JFK assassination and the Jewish state's nuclear weapons
program.

Knowing how the Jewish state obtained nuclear weapons is a prerequisite for knowing how to remove them.
Not just the weapons, but the technology too!

The 9/11 Truth Movement has been led to believe that the Twin Towers
and WTC7 were brought down mainly by aluminum powdered incendiaries. However, these military grade explosives do not
explain the off the chart seismic spikes. But energy channelled nuclear devices do.

Let's examine all the
motives, means and opportunities for this "New Pearl Harbor."

Update September 2013: On her last
visit to New York City in 1997, Princess Diana told me she heard from a source that she did not identify that James Jesus
Angleton would "pose" as Thomas Stearns Eliot on visits to London. My "Angleton/Eliot Same Man Theory"
does not mean that they were literally one and the same person, although they were in effect one and the same person.
For more background on this, please seehttp://www.show-the-house.com/id27.html.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #50 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY15 December 2008

Dear
Mr. Attorney General,Judith Miller, the New York Times cheerleader for the unjustified, immoral and illegal
invasion and occupation of Iraq, the passionate purveyor of the quotations of Curveball, now gushes over the 8 December
2008 appointment of Joseph M. Demarest as the new Assistant Director of the FBI in charge of the New York Regional Office.
(Click to see her article.)Before being pinged to the FBI from Goldman
Sachs where he was head of international security, Demarest was one of two "shift commanders" for the FBI's putative
investigation of the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon.

David Ray Griffin, in his 2004 book The New Pearl Harbor,
and in this year's The New Pearl Harbor Revisited, has accumulated a devastating array of evidence which logically
points to a cover-up of what really happened at the Pentagon and WTC on 9/11. And now we see that an engineer of this
cover-up, Demarest, has again gone to his reward.

What else can one say about an investigation that confiscated
and withholds videotapes of the attack? That has not shown one piece of a jet with a serial number stamped into the
heat resistant steel alloy? That has not explained the deaths in the inner rings of the Pentagon? Or the computers
being set on fire spontaneously? Or the many aeronautical anomalies on display that day? Etc. etc. etc..

I dare Demarest and Mueller to debate Griffin. We'll find out why ignoring Griffin has been the FBI's only face-saving
argument thus far.

As for Miller and her predilection to dupe Americans into fighting her wars, I turn your attention,
Mr. Attorney General, to the dark utterance of Ira Lewis "Scooter" Libby, which came to light during Miller's testimony
before a grand jury:

"You went into jail in the summer.... it is fall now.... Out West, where you vacation,
the aspens will already be turning. They turn in clusters, because their roots connect them. Come back to work
– and life."

I ask you, sir, as a Jew, is this not an example of a Jew reminding another Jew about adherence
to the Talmudic Law of the Moser? Does this conspiracy of silence apply to the New Pearl Harbor of 9/11 as
well as the Valerie Plame affair?

Update September 2013: David Ray Griffin, the leading critic
of the 9/11 Commission and an inspiration to many including this writer, has been experiencing health issues.
Therefore, as his substitute in a debate with FBI Director Mueller and FBI Assistant Director Demarest, let me propose the
Citizen Investigation Team, which is Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis. Their extraordinary
investigation of what happened at the Pentagon on the morning of 11 September 2001 is summarized
in their excellent documentary film which can be viewed athttp://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/nsa.html. I dare Mueller and Demarest to respond. They should be ashamed of themselves.
Griffin and Ranke and Marquis deserve our nation's praise! Update February 2014: See http://www.show-the-house.com/id77.html for Judith Miller's article on Demarest.

In
the nonce I sent by regular mail this offer to Michael Mukasey to coauthor a book with me as a way of eliciting responses
to questions and other points raised in this series of open letters on 9/11.

I
also went for broke and sent by regular mail a similar offer to President Bush to coauthor a book with me as a way of eliciting
answers to my questions and other points raised in my series of open letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael
B. Mukasey.

OPEN LETTER #51 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY19 December 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,What are the odds that Benjamin Netanyahu's Communications Director David Bar Ilan would
have a heart attack shortly after my fax broadcast in December 1999 in which I noted that two mysterious airline crashes looked
like sabotage in the interests of the Zionist state?

What are the odds that both crashes -- sudden, unexplained
nosedives -- were the only ones of their kind in aviation history until the day I began to send a second fax broadcast again
suggesting electromagnetic interference in the flight operations of EgyptAir 990 (31 October 1999) and a USAF EC-135N (6 May
1981)?

What are the odds that as I sent that second fax broadcast Alaska Airlines 261 went down in a similar nosedive
within sight of Goleta, California, home of Metatech, an industry leader in the science of electromagnetic interference?
(See http://www.metatechcorp.com/)

Odd odds?

I discerned a pattern of interference in
flight operations when I discovered that the 9/11 aerial acrobatics of UA 175 and AA 77 can only be explained by remote control
and that Netanyahu had declared 9/11 "good for Israel."

I called on Dov Zakheim, the Pentagon Comptroller
on 9/11 with a background in remote control systems, to explain. A Zionist who had just lost $2.1 trillion of the Pentagon's
money and who had suggested a "New Pearl Harbor" to quicken implementation of recommendations for global dominance
through military transformations, Zakheim certainly had the motive, means and opportunity to pull off a false flag black intelligence
operation.

Now I add the brain trust at Metatech at least as an indispensable way to probe the mysteries of 9/11.

Let's head off the CIA's "limited hangout" through the 9/11 Truth Movement in which aluminum powdered incendiaries
offer the only explanation for the controlled demolitions of WTC1, 2 & 7 and mobbed up union members are arrested for
setting charges under cover of legitimate work assignments after Silverstein's acquisition of the buildings.

Only
advanced, cutting edge science pursued at Sandia Laboratories (See
http://www.sandia.gov/) and Applied Research Associates (See http://www.ara.com/) and Metatech can explain the bewildering phenomena noted at "Ground
Zero" and the Pentagon.

Angleton operated just two blocks NNW of the White House at the Army Navy Club, where there is underground parking suitable
for clandestine meetings.

Both Felt, who did not smoke, and Angleton, a heavy smoker in real life as well as on
the Silver Screen, were fervent Zionists determined to neutralize Nixon's efforts to investigate Zionist looting of weapons
grade nuclear fuel from NUMEC in Apollo, Pennsylvania.

Why do Woodward, Bernstein & the Post tell lies that
obfuscate Iran's worthy goal of a Middle East free of WMDs?

The 2005 Felt "revelation" holds in check
my theory that Angleton not only was "Deep Throat" but would also pose as the poet T. S. Eliot on visits to London,
which, if true, suggests a British or even a Soviet spin on his intrigues.

At a time when the "Downing Street Memo" -- if correctly understood -- threatened to expose British manipulations
behind our unjustified invasion of Iraq, the Angleton/Eliot Same Man theory would have compounded the embarrassment with deep
historical context.

And by 2005, the proverbial cat was already out of the bag with the 2003 death of Dr. David
Kelly and the haunting realization that the British were prompting the USA to live a 13 year lie about WMDs in Iraq.

Murdoch's cartoons of Blair as Bush's poodle prevailed, when the reverse was really true.

Also unbeknownst to
the public, Arthur Schlesinger and Richard Helms had quietly given their nod to the Angleton/Eliot Same Man theory.
(See http://www.show-the-house.com/id35.html.)

Where have our grand scale deceits led us?

Our people are stuck on stupid by believing an impossible account of 9/11 featuring no airport videos, impossible cell and
air phone calls and explanations of building collapses contradicting scientific descriptions of controlled demolition.

Saudi businessmen have offered $10 million for just one of the shoes thrown at President Bush, even after the shoes
were torn apart to search for explosives.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #53 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY24 December 2008 MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL!!!

Dear Mr. Attorney General,Our
Upper East Side neighbor Bernard L. Madoff, who made off with billions of other people's money, is an off shore type of guy,
isn't he?

The thought occurred to me as I watched an ingenious seagull fly a few hundred yards inland to drop a
clamshell on a paved road so as to crack it open and have a meal.

Judging by the serene smile on Madoff's face,
what he did was for the greater good of the Jewish state. The money did not simply disappear into thin air. And
isn't the Jewish state the USA's largest off-shore aircraft carrier?

The Latin word for our adverb secretly is
clam, which is nearly identical in spelling but opposite in meaning to the Latin verb clamare, to shout
or proclaim; indeed, some secrets cry out for attention. How Madoff gamed the system for over a decade can be discerned
in the stultifying conventional wisdom of our investigative journalists.

The New York Times reporter Dan
Barry serves as a good example. Recently Barry wrote of a dying Mafioso, "still, ever-faithful to that perverse
code of the streets, he seemed insulted when asked about the deeds of others." ("An Old Mobster Lets Go of
a Long-Kept Secret," New York Times, 22 December 2008, page A13) This is of course a reference to the
Mafioso Code of Omertà.

But it is very unlikely that Barry and his ilk are even aware of the Talmudic
Law of the Moser, which engenders among Jews a systemic conspiracy of silence. Barry would be out of a job
if he ever wrote about the Talmudic Law of the Moser. You know it and I know it. That's how Madoff and
other members of the Mishpacha reign.

There will be great healing worldwide if we bury the Talmudic Law
of the Moser in a deep pit.

That smart seagull who left his feathered friends dropping their clams onto
the soft sand also teaches us a very valuable lesson related to 9/11, and this letter is about 9/11, isn't it?

When clamshells fall onto a hard surface, they break into shards. So too does concrete break into chunks. But
if you look at Richard A. Siegel's video taken from a pier in Hoboken, you will see concrete being pulverized in
mid-air, which can only be explained by energy far greater than what a localized jet impact and mechanical collapse can provide.

Tens of thousands of tons of easily respirable particles can only come from high powered explosives.

Any
unbiased bird-brain can understand that!

Capisci?

Stephen M. St. John

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html to learn about the Talmudic Law of the Moser, which prohibits a
Jew from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew, an unhealthy phenomenon as real as the Mafioso Code of Omertà!

Text
of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #54 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY30 December 2008
Happy New Year 2009!

Dear Mr. Attorney General,I join with Uri Avnery and Israeli peace advocates of Gush
Shalom (http://www.gush-shalom.org) in calling for a stop to the cruel and crazy slaughter of Palestinians
in Gaza.

I also note how the biased media reporting is the very same as in the case of 9/11. People who are
stuck on stupid know not what they do. But for how long will they be forgiven for their ignorance?

All the
people in the world can be divided into two groups: those who believe that cell and air phone calls were made by passengers
and stewardesses on the allegedly hijacked flights of 9/11, and those who know such calls were impossible to make and that
high tech impersonations offer the only explanation for the reported calls. The former group is stuck on stupid; the
latter is dedicated to the pursuit of truth, and justice for the praxis of evil that deceived so many into waging unjustified
wars.

Over the course of decades, the Associated Press has regularly made outstanding contributions of Zionist
propaganda to keep the American people stuck on stupid. Just as the AP will not come clean about the impossibility of
cell and air phone calls on 9/11, this toastmaster of totalitarianism predictably gives only partial background information
about the ongoing war crimes in Gaza.

Without such knowledge, people cannot ask themselves why Bush
and Obama failed to condemn this raid on Election Day in the USA, which the Guardian described as "the first
major Israeli air strike on Gaza since June."

Moveover, people cannot ask themselves why Bush and Obama condemn
only Hamas attacks made in retaliation to the Zionist attacks. They remain clueless about the Zionists' decades old
"success formula" of provocation and ten-fold retaliation on the responders to the provocation.

The Zionist
atrocities are rooted in the hateful ideology of the Talmud (see http://www.come-and-hear.com/), but propaganda conceals this basic fact.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #55 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY1
January 2009 May 2009 be the year we all hear the whole truth about 9/11!!!

Dear Mr. Attorney General,To continue my thread on the Associated Press, let me point out that the Zionist/USA doctrine
of shock and awe, so well camouflaged by the AP as valiant self defense in Gaza, now prompts Gush Shalom (http://www.gush-shalom.org) to proclaim, "The government has mounted the tiger of war. Now
it doesn't know how to get off. All of us will pay the price."

Indeed!

But the AP does not
neglect the home front, where last week's false reports would have you believe Philadelphia lawyer Philip J. Berg's challenge
to President Elect Obama regarding his qualifications to be President was dismissed by the US Supreme Court.

While Berg's arguments based on facts and laws pertaining to
Obama's citizenship status and qualifications to be President have yet to be put to the test in a court of law, it is perfectly
clear that the AP wants to dumb down the citizenry on vitally important issues both here and abroad.

The news media's
connivance in the Big Lie about 9/11 has never been so well documented than in the CNN audio feed to 1010WINS radio station
in New York City, which you can hear at the 11:40 minute mark on Richard A. Siegel's film of the WTC building collapses (http://www.911raw.com/).

CNN's Chris Plant, at the Pentagon, related the eyewitness
testimony of a USAF senior enlisted man who saw a military helicopter circle the Pentagon and then saw and heard a huge explosion
and fireball as the helicopter reached the side of the building next to the helicopter landing zone.

The CNN transmission
is promptly cut, and the WINS announcer, Lee, repeats the party line of a jet crash and adds false information that the tail
section of the jet was seen by an AP reporter on the scene.

Of course a real investigation of 9/11 will also reveal
the praxis of evil's editing "on the fly."

NYC residents only! Visit http://www.nyc911initiative.org and print out, sign and mail in your petition for a referendum on NYC's
November 2009 Mayoral Election ballot which calls for a real investigation of 9/11 and cover-up. Or call 646 537 1755.

Help spread the word about this effort to fill the void left by officials who have
been remiss in their duties. Please support this ballot initiative! http://nyc911initiative.org/

Update September 2013:Philip Berg's arguments based on
facts and laws pertaining to Obama's citizenship status and qualifications to be President have never been heard in a
court of law because of the lower court ruling that he lacks standing in the matter. This is most unfortunate.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #56 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY11 January 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney
General,President Elect Barack Obama's choice of Leon Panetta to be the next Director of the CIA ensures business as
usual. Panetta is just another yes-man whose stewardship on the Iraq Study Group serves as a good example.

As I alone pointed out in my fax broadcast of 11 December 2006 (http://www.show-the-house.com/id8.html, scroll to that date), the Iraq Study Group reported 5,000 civilian contract
personnel in Iraq, whereas the correct figure, we soon found out, is in the order of 100,000.

So do you think Panetta,
who could not effectively communicate with the Pentagon, CIA and White House for the ISG, is the kind of guy who can level
with the President and tell him, for example, that the cell and air phone calls from jets "hijacked" on 9/11 were
all bogus?

If we cannot have a clean break from the Mena Drug Cartel in the Oval office (See cropped Reuters photo at right) since the
days of the death squads in El Salvador, and if we cannot talk honestly about the number of civilian contractors in Iraq today,
we certainly cannot fathom to what degree they supplement the military's "shock & awe" doctrine to subdue the
people of Iraq -- a people, I might add, who never attacked us in the first place!

To what extent do our Zionist buddies influence the war crimes?
Ehud Barak, the psychopath still unpunished for mass murder of thousands upon thousands of Lebanese in 1982, is now buying
his 2009 election with white phosphorous bombs and the blood of hundreds of children in Gaza.

Propaganda, war profiteering
and immorality reign.

Only a CIA Director who will get real information and level with the POTUS can bring about
the change that Obama has promised.

But before we move on, we need to go back and confront the truth and consequences
of 9/11, and take the other turn in the road not taken before.

Afghanistan and Iraq began at the airport gates
of 9/11, yet we have no routine video surveillance images.

Update September 2013: By way of clarification, we have not seen any 9/11 airport surveillance
video evidence whatsoever from Newark Liberty International Airport and Boston Logan International Airport. The video
from Washington Dulles International Airport lacks a time-stamp and is therefore worthless as evidence pertaining to alleged
hijackings on 9/11. The video from Portland Maine International Airport is problematic for many reasons.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #57 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY12 January 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney
General,People around the world are troubled by Zionism's full spectrum fraud and force in Gaza, and are at a loss to deal effectively
with a chronic problem that has plagued the 20th Century and now threatens this young century.

Why does the holy
name Israel stink so badly?

Consider this tale of three walls: If the Zionists were the real deal (namely
the House of Israel and the House of Judah, both prophesied to return to the Holy Land) we would have seen by now a wall of
stones with the entire Torah engraved on it, as commanded in Deuteronomy 27:2-3.

Instead, we see an altogether
different kind of wall, the wall of separation, which is not only illegal according to international law, but belies the very
words of Moses on exactly how he and his people would be separated (Exodus 33:16).

Lastly, I find that communicating
with you is like talking to a wall! You cannot gainsay my presentments!

So these three walls tell me the
Zionists aren't really who they say they are and that you and your fellow Zionists know 9/11 truth will be the undoing of
Zionism.

Getting back to 1010WINS radio
on 9/11, which was recorded live on Richard A. Siegel's video of the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers (http://www.911raw.com/), I ask, how could FOX News give a report of an explosion near the Supreme
Court Building in Washington when there was no such explosion? Why such disinformation?

According to 28 United
States Code paragraph 372 (c), my petition and complaint at the 11th Circuit Judicial Council had the potential to be referred
by the chief judges there to the annual Judicial Conference convened by Chief Justice Rehnquist on the morning of 11 September
2001.

This potential was neutralized when a US Marshall evacuated Rehnquist and 26 of the most senior judges in
the USA out a side door into the street.

My petition had all to do with the USS Liberty and the occupied
Golan Heights of Syria.

Was the falsely reported bomb a signal that this very real risk to Zionist public relations
concerns had been obviated by the events of 9/11?

Update February 2014: Exodus 33:16 gives a spiritual concept
of separation for the children of Israel; namely, their separation is defined only by the presence of the Almighty among them,
and not by walls, ghettos, shtetls, overt or covert restrictive covenants in property deeds and national trusts, international
borders or even the decisions on admission made by condominium and cooperative apartment boards. Just as the priestly
tribe of Levi had no inheritance of land among all the other tribes of Israel, but lived in the lands of all the other tribes,
so too will the descendants of Israel live alone spiritually among all the nations of the earth, but they "shall not
be reckoned among the nations" according to the word of the Almighty which was spoken by Balaam (Numbers 23:9).
The Zionist state is not the real deal!

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #58 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY16
January 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,As our Zionist buddies smother the lives of so many civilians with cruel implements of war, including illegal white phosphorous
(see SANA photo, at right, of an Arab child in Gaza at http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html),
let us bear in mind the chronic suffering of the people of Palestine in terror campaigns and waves of ethnic cleansing leading
to the founding of the Jewish state, and the "divide and conquer" policies, including stolen elections, still perpetrated
against them.

Secretary of State Rice, who vacillated in seeking cease fires in Lebanon in 2006 and now Gaza in
2009, was formerly Provost of Stanford University, home of the Hoover Institute. It was Herbert Hoover who campaigned
in 1937 for the "transfer" of Palestinian Arabs from their lands to make room for our Zionist buddies even as a
Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland, adopted "transfer" as its official policy.

So Rice appears to
have deep roots in an international enterprise that, by gradual degrees of fraud and force, is dispossessing a valiant people
who are now resisting their own genocide.

Not an "even-handed broker of peace," Rice has only quickened
the siege mentality of the Khazar-descended Ashkenazis who are of Turkic origin and are not the blood of Abraham.

So Rice, like Cheney and Bush, knows what's good for the Jewish state.

So tell me, Mr. Attorney General, does
separation of church and state mean separation of synagogue and state?

If so, has our failure to remove an obvious
double standard explain why Miss Rice, like Cheney and Bush, was not duly sworn to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing
but the truth when she gave testimony before the 9/11 Commission?

After all, inasmuch as the Beebster, Benjamin
Netanyahu, said more than once that 9/11 was "good for Israel," wouldn't you think the 9/11 Commission's unequal
and exceptional treatment of Cheney, Bush and Rice raises red flags with regard to the integrity of its investigations?

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #59 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY

18 January 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,Were I Captain Chesley
Sullenberger, who, with all engines lost, glided his US Airways Airbus to a safe, emergency belly landing in the Hudson Fjord,
I would deeply resent my having to pee in a cup for the National Transportation Safety Board. What a way to treat a
hero!

But the Sullenbergers will attend the Inauguration in Washington next Tuesday, and I think this real hero's
US Airways jet is an apt symbol of our ship of state as we are finally rid of Bush and stand on a wing and a prayer in the
aftermath of his bloody lies, secrecy, destruction and waste.

There's much to do on an emergency basis. I
hope we all act with the verve and alacrity of the ferrymen who rescued the crew and passengers of Flight 1549. May
the Almighty guide and protect us!

Just as the black boxes will ultimately reveal details of a miracle on the Hudson,
a real investigation of 9/11 will help us better to understand our past so as to illuminate our future.

Why would
the AP report recovery of the tail section of the jet that allegedly hit the Pentagon when there was no recovery of any identifiable
part whatsoever? (Clarification: There was no recovery of any identifiable part of
a commercial airliner whatsoever!)

Who was the senior USAF enlisted man who told CNN a helicopter was present
when the explosion and fireball occurred at the Pentagon?

Who at Fox News said a bomb went off near the Supreme
Court Building when no such event took place?

You can hear all these reports on 1010WINS radio, which is an integral
part of the soundtrack of Richard A. Siegel's video recording of the controlled demolitions of the World Trade Center.

Text of fax broadcast:OPEN LETTER #60 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF
THE USA MICHAEL MUKASEY AND ERIC HOLDER19 January 2009 In Memoriam: Reverend Martin Luther King

Dear Messrs. Attorneys General,The great English poet John Milton wrote "hope never comes that comes to
all"; though the new administration certainly brings hope to very many, I remain steadfast in my hope, howsoever well
deferred it may be, that new people and new thinking at the US Department of Justice will recognize the need for a full, fair
and impartial investigation of 9/11 and give it the highest priority.

For in a very real sense, the invasions and
occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq began at the airport gates of 9/11, yet we have no credible video surveillance evidence
of any of the passengers -- let alone hijackers -- at these airports, a very unusual circumstance which has never been explained.

Couple this fact with another fact -- that cell and air phone calls were technically not possible, yet such calls
were supposedly made -- and we have a second red flag strongly indicating a deception known in the intelligence community
as a "false flag black op."

Among the very few with the combined motive, means and opportunity to pull
off such a black operation involving high tech means including PROMIS and Ptech software overriding and intervening in US
Government computer systems is the Jewish state, and you, Mr. Attorney General Mukasey, are a Zionist Jew whose judgment may
very well be clouded by conflicts of interest.

And you, Mr. Attorney General Holder, have already had your buttons
pressed by Zionists and their agents in the cases of fugitive from justice Marc Rich and the rainmaking for his entirely undeserved
pardon. I certainly hope you have learned a good lesson and are the wiser for it.

If you search my fax broadcasts
you will see I give circumstantial evidence potentially linking Jonathan Pollard and Marc Rich as brokers of commodities involving
tanker ships in the early 1980s. I have wondered if Mr. Pollard's generous offers to others might have involved PROMIS
software.

This is just the tip of the iceberg.

At http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html
you can read all my previous letters to your predecessor; I am ready to assist you in any way I can, up to and including overseeing
a real investigation of 9/11.

Let me get my hands on the bastards who did this crime even if they're Jews!

All original articles written by Stephen M. St. John and published
on this website and its forerunner mysite.verizon.net/vze4wbps are fully protected by copyright law. All rights are
reserved. However, non-commercial dissemination of these articles is allowed and encouraged so long as there is no change
to the text or its meaning and proper attribution is given to the author, Stephen M. St. John. Requests for commercial
republication should be directed to the author through the contact information given below. The author is not responsible
for any changes made to the contents of this website without his awareness and consent, and will as soon as possible restore
the true content if and when such unauthorized changes are discovered.