Sunday Downtime - All Evolve Media Sites are being migrated to a new data center Sunday Dec 11, 2016. The migration will occur during an 8 AM to 2 PM (Pacific Time) maintenance window. We will have up to 1 hour of downtime for any of our sites.

Sylvester is awkwardly abrasive about all the wrong things. Peters isn't good at talking out loud (I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and assume stuff sounds right in his head). The two of them together puts the 'sin' in synergy.

K-Sly was in rare homer form today. He was belittling a caller who said he'd rather have losses leading to a #1 pick than pointlessly squeaking into 8th place for a futile attempt at a playoff run.

K-Sly insisted that "no way" the Sabres finish behind Colorado, Calgary and Florida, because those teams are "really bad". Huh? I guess a homer always needs someone to look down on, but in case K-Sly hasn't noticed, the Sabres are about as bad as it gets. Of course he doesn't take games-in-hand into account either in his latest keen assessment. He also thinks you still have a shot at the top picks even finishing 9th. Again, the "odds" concept escapes him.

I wanted to punch my radio when I heard Petey throw the "Look at L.A." exclamation out there in explaining how "anything can happen" when you land in 8th. UGH! They just don't get it. Gee, landing a key player to build a Cup team around vs. middling. Hmmmm. I gotta think about which I'd prefer. I almost wish L.A. didn't win, just because now, every fan who failed math/statistics will be a-ok with middling...because anything can happen!

K-Sly was in rare homer form today. He was belittling a caller who said he'd rather have losses leading to a #1 pick than pointlessly squeaking into 8th place for a futile attempt at a playoff run.

K-Sly insisted that "no way" the Sabres finish behind Colorado, Calgary and Florida, because those teams are "really bad". Huh? I guess a homer always needs someone to look down on, but in case K-Sly hasn't noticed, the Sabres are about as bad as it gets. Of course he doesn't take games-in-hand into account either in his latest keen assessment. He also thinks you still have a shot at the top picks even finishing 9th. Again, the "odds" concept escapes him.

I wanted to punch my radio when I heard Petey throw the "Look at L.A." exclamation out there in explaining how "anything can happen" when you land in 8th. UGH! They just don't get it. Gee, landing a key player to build a Cup team around vs. middling. Hmmmm. I gotta think about which I'd prefer. I almost wish L.A. didn't win, just because now, every fan who failed math/statistics will be a-ok with middling...because anything can happen!

As annoying as they are, I agree with Ksly on this one. Colorado, Calgary and Florida really are much worse than us.

K-Sly was in rare homer form today. He was belittling a caller who said he'd rather have losses leading to a #1 pick than pointlessly squeaking into 8th place for a futile attempt at a playoff run.

Ugh, he's such an ass. I would never listen to the show, but I frequent this thread to pick up the highlights of his incompetence. He lacks hockey knowledge, wit, and speaking ability; he makes up for it with an undeserved condescension to his listeners.

K-Sly was in rare homer form today. He was belittling a caller who said he'd rather have losses leading to a #1 pick than pointlessly squeaking into 8th place for a futile attempt at a playoff run.

K-Sly insisted that "no way" the Sabres finish behind Colorado, Calgary and Florida, because those teams are "really bad". Huh? I guess a homer always needs someone to look down on, but in case K-Sly hasn't noticed, the Sabres are about as bad as it gets. Of course he doesn't take games-in-hand into account either in his latest keen assessment. He also thinks you still have a shot at the top picks even finishing 9th. Again, the "odds" concept escapes him.

I wanted to punch my radio when I heard Petey throw the "Look at L.A." exclamation out there in explaining how "anything can happen" when you land in 8th. UGH! They just don't get it. Gee, landing a key player to build a Cup team around vs. middling. Hmmmm. I gotta think about which I'd prefer. I almost wish L.A. didn't win, just because now, every fan who failed math/statistics will be a-ok with middling...because anything can happen!

The guy very obviously makes you angry, yet you seem to tune in every day. Why?

Former writer, then long-standing mod. Great guy to talk puck with... or beer... or humor... or, well, you get the picture.

Wow, that's really cool! Even if I'm not a significant poster on this board, I spend a TON of time reading the thoughts of others. It's crazy that a guy in his position was once a prominent poster here. Even more awesome to see how successful he is becoming.

Sylvester and Peters really seem to enjoy what he has to say and he's even changed their minds on a couple ideas/prospects the times I've listened. Plus he seems to be getting the WGR regulars more into the prospect/draft part of the game. whenever they've brought him on the shows.

Those WGR guys will never be as knowledgeable as a lot of posters on this board, but it's a start, and I think Baker is a big part of that.

I honestly dont mind Peters in the role he has right now. While not the best speaker he comes from the heart, had cool stories, and I have a feeling many of the interviews are a result of him reaching out to people he knows. I also like that they can go on tangents sometimes. Far better than the afternoon guys who so clearly have an agenda that I cant listen to them anymore.

I honestly dont mind Peters in the role he has right now. While not the best speaker he comes from the heart, had cool stories, and I have a feeling many of the interviews are a result of him reaching out to people he knows. I also like that they can go on tangents sometimes. Far better than the afternoon guys who so clearly have an agenda that I cant listen to them anymore.

Peters is good half the time. He is good kibitzing with the players.

He was frustrating the hell out of Duff this week. Peters just can't keep up with Duff (or Sylvester). Both Duff and Sylvester will intro an idea/thought and then want/wait for Peters to respond. Dead air............ Duff was also working hard to keep Peters on topic.

A few times Duff just responded: "YOU ARE awful"

I think Peters just zones out or gets distracted. I really envision that he is texting during these moments.

Smart that Duff did the interview with DunLevy and RJ without Peters..

With that said when Sylvester started the show alone and had Peters on as a guest, I thought to myself that Sylvester needs Peters full time.

Not a big fan of Kevin Sylvester's broadcasting style, and there are obvious issues with Andrew Peters' coherency as well, but all is forgiven! If they can serve up Michael Peca then follow it up with Phil Esposito on my way to work I can live with it.

Not a big fan of Kevin Sylvester's broadcasting style, and there are obvious issues with Andrew Peters' coherency as well, but all is forgiven! If they can serve up Michael Peca then follow it up with Phil Esposito on my way to work I can live with it.