North Carolina’s Body Camera Footage Laws

North Carolina’s Disclosure of Body Cam Footage Laws

Transparency in law enforcement is at the forefront of public policy issues now more than ever. Disclosing body cam footage worn by law enforcement is at the center of it all. Does the government’s need to closely guard the use of force and the conduct of its officers during active investigations offset the public’s right to hold law enforcement accountable for their actions? How can the public hold law enforcement accountable for excessive force, abuse of power, or misconduct when the public cannot have access to information?

In recent years questions of police brutality and misconduct have dominated the headlines, and much of it was captured on body cam footage worn by law enforcement officers. Merely mentioning places like Ferguson, MO; Chicago, IL; Cleveland, OH; Baltimore, MD; North Charleston, SC; and Baton Rouge, LA summons tragic images of police encounters which have led to the deaths of those who were the subject of the stories and video footage.

Last year in Baltimore, MD, three cases of police misconduct were captured on body cam footage. In one instance, police officers were caught planting fake evidence at a crime scene. After the footage was reviewed by the public defender, the charges were dropped, and the suspect was released from jail, but not before being locked-up for several months. In another instance, body cam footage caught other officers planting evidence during a traffic stop. “Prosecutors have dropped at least 40 criminal cases following the release of the two sets of footage (NPR). More than 50 other cases are being reviewed, the state’s attorney’s office in Baltimore told CNN. The public defender’s office told NPR hundreds of other cases were “at risk of being tossed out” (pbs.org).

More and more law enforcement agencies have mandated the use of body cams, but there is no uniform law regarding the public’s right to access body cam footage. The laws regarding public access to government records differ from state to state, and each state’s standard for releasing body cam footage varies. The federal government has its own laws regarding the release of information under the control of the federal government and can be found under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C.§ 552.

The Skinny: From HB 972 to N.C.G.S. 132-1.4A

HB 972 proposed in part:

AN ACT TO PROVIDE THAT RECORDINGS MADE BY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES ARE NOT PUBLIC RECORDS, TO ESTABLISH WHETHER, TO WHOM, AND WHAT PORTIONS OF A RECORDING MAY BE DISCLOSED OR A COPY RELEASED, TO ESTABLISH THE PROCEDURE FOR CONTESTING A REFUSAL TO DISCLOSE A RECORDING OR TO OBTAIN A COPY OF A RECORDING, TO DIRECT STATE OR LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES TO PROVIDE, UPON REQUEST, ACCESS TO A METHOD TO VIEW AND ANALYZE RECORDINGS TO THE STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE CRIME LABORATORY…

House Bill 972 became North Carolina’s new law addressing the public disclosure of recordings made by law enforcement as of October 1, 2016.

What Constitutes a Recording Under North Carolina Law?

A recording is defined as “a visual, audio, or visual and audio recording captured by a body-worn camera, a dashboard camera, or any other video or audio recording device operated by or on behalf of a law enforcement agency or law enforcement agency personnel when carrying out law enforcement responsibilities. This term does not include any video or audio recordings of interviews regarding agency internal investigations or interviews or interrogations of suspects or witnesses.” N.C.G.S. 132-1.4A (6).

Who Can Request A Recording?

The recording will be released only to 1) the subject whose image or voice is captured in the recording; or 2) a personal representative of an adult person (who must consent to the release of the recording) whose image or voice was captured in the recording; or 3) a personal representative of a minor, or an adult person who is under lawful guardianship, and whose image or voice is captured in the recording; or 4) a personal representative of a deceased person whose image or voice is captured in the recording; or 5) a personal representative of an adult person who is incapacitated and unable to provide consent to disclosure. § 132-1.4 (c 1-5)

How Can I Requesting a Recording?

You can send a written request to the Custodian of Records of the law enforcement agency from which you are seeking a recording from. You must include the date and time of the incident captured in the recording and/or describe the activity sufficiently enough to identify the recording you are requesting. § 132-1.4 (c) It is helpful to provide as much detail as possible.

What Happens if My Request is Denied?

Because the disclosure of body cam footage is not public record, your request very well may be denied. However, if your request is denied you can apply to the superior court in the county where any portion of the recording was made for a review of your denied request.

The court may order the disclosure of the recording only if the court finds that the law enforcement agency abused its discretion in denying the request for disclosure. The court may only order disclosure of those portions of the recording that are relevant to the person’s request. A person who receives disclosure pursuant to this subsection shall not record or copy the recording. An order issued pursuant to this subsection may not order the release of the recording…

132-1.4 (e)

Not only is there an absence of uniformity in the laws of disclosure regarding body cam footage, there is also no uniformity amongst the various law enforcement agencies’ policies and procedures for utilizing body cams. There is a “patchwork of laws that regulates the collection and availability of such footage across the country” (Urban Institute Report, Feb. 2016).

The use of body cams has already raised legal questions concerning the 4th Amendment. In Washington State, body cam footage taken inside a private residence was released on YouTube. In 2016, Washington enacted an exemption to its Public Records Act. The exemption specifically covers body camera footage that records “[t]he interior of a place of residence where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.”

As the use of body cams in law enforcement agencies become more widespread, so will the controversy about uniformity in the policies and procedures regarding the usage and disclosure of body cam footage. The solution(s) must be balanced with public interest and the constitutional ramifications of the same.

Many times the body camera footage becomes important in car accident cases where one of the parties makes a statement against interest. In those situations the Plaintiff’s lawyer needs to get the footage as soon as possible. To discuss your case please contact us. You will speak with an attorney who can discuss your case. There is no fee for an initial consultation.

I can not say enough about this law firm. They were very professional but had a way of making you feel like you were their only case. They worked so hard for us, kept us informed at all times and we are very pleased with the outcome. Cory was so helpful and straight to the point. Isaac is so professional, polite and works harder than anyone I know. He was always on top of everything and his knowledge on everything about our case was incredible! I highly recommend them and their services!

Kevin Hughes

00:14 31 May 18

I highly recommend this Firm. Cory and Issac were always extremely professional and frequently went above and beyond the call of duty. They worked diligently, always responded quickly and answered my unending questions with grace and patience. I wouldn't hesitate to reach out to them again if I needed legal advice/counsel.

anim reyna

15:01 29 Mar 18

Highly recommended!! I worked with both Corey and Mathew and they are both EXCELLENT attorneys! Delma and Issac the paralegals that work in the office are beyond great! I would recommend this law office to any of my family members, friends and even strangers! I brought two cases to them(one was on going for almost two years) and they worked it all out for me and I was very satisfied with the results and would return back to them

Marissa Jackson

15:27 16 Mar 18

I am grateful to have worked with Cory Rosensteel and his team, I personally worked with Isaac Barker. A great team that really helped me understand and answer any questions I had along he way. Very happy with the way the case settled thanks to them. Will definitely be recommending them to anyone looking for great team.

Adero Burbridge

14:55 29 Apr 18

Rosensteel Fleishman was recommended to us to help with an auto accident. Our attorney Matt Fleishman and his paralegal were very professional and patient when aiding my elderly parents with their situation. Throughout the process, they were always available and kept us abreast of what was happening with the case. I would and have recommended them to friends and family.

Kimberly Morrison

10:45 19 Jun 18

Corey Fleishman and his staff are fantastic. Calls, emails and any questions you have are returned promptly. Every aspect of my case was explained thoroughly to me. I highly recommend this law firm to anyone who has been in an accident. Luis was always patient and informative. Great job on mine and my children's settlement. I HOPE to never have to go thru this process again, but if I do....Rosensteel and Fleishman will get the first call.. Great job everyone!

David Glassman

02:06 17 Jul 18

Excellent communication and customer service. Cory was very easy to talk to each step of the way. Isaac was amazing to work with. He answered every question I had along the way as well. I would highly recommend this firm.

zohaib rizvi

17:00 23 Jul 18

I cannot recommend this law firm highly enough. I am very much satisfied with the way the case settled. Paralegal, Luis, had always kept me updated on my case and at every stage of my case, Mathew thoroughly explained the options and let me take the informed decision; and answered all my questions througout the case as well. Very happy with the settlement, Thanks to Matthew and team. Highly recommended law firm.

Amanda Krawiec

21:10 21 Aug 18

HIGHLY RECOMMEND! My husband was in a car totaling crash where he sustained neck & back injuries as well as a concussion that caused months of issues. The person who hit him did not have insurance. I can’t explain the hell we went through before we found Matt Fleishman and Issac Barker. It was a tricky situation and without their legal help and expertise we would have had even more headache(then he was already experiencing). They knew exactly what steps to take and handled all his dr bills as well as recommended great drs. Issac personally called just to check on us, some of those calls I spent crying to him as a wife seeing her husband suffer. Thankfully my husband recovered and we were able to get our case settled to our liking. If you want results, expert legal advice & kind people handling your troubles I would go here!!! Thank you so much for all the time you put into handling every piece of this horrible experience so we didn’t have to! I can firmly say they went above and beyond!

Shaquille Clary

19:43 09 Sep 18

I had an an amazing experience with the Fleishman group. Tiffany and Luis were excellent and very helpful with my experience. They upheld the highest professionalism at all times and made it a top priority that my case be handled expeditiously. My attorney Corey Rosensteel is an seasoned professional and will take care of your every need. I will use the same team in the future and I recommend them to anyone in need of attorney services. Thanks guys!!!

Nicole Loor

19:35 26 Sep 18

Highly recommend. Very professional and am very happy with everything they did for me!

K. L. Suess

00:28 09 Nov 18

HIGHLY RECOMMEND... Worked with Attorney Matthew Fleishman and Isaac Barker - both are professional, helpful and knowledgeable. Definitely feel they look out for the best interest of their client(s).