Starting today, we're enabling people everywhere to find and read full
text legal opinions from U.S. federal and state district, appellate and
supreme courts using Google Scholar. You can find these opinions by searching for cases (like Planned Parenthood v. Casey), or by topics (like desegregation)
or other queries that you are interested in. For example, go to Google
Scholar, click on the "Legal opinions and journals" radio button, and
try the query separate but equal. Your search results will include links to cases familiar to many of us in the U.S. such as Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education,
which explore the acceptability of "separate but equal" facilities for
citizens at two different points in the history of the U.S. But your
results will also include opinions from cases that you might be less
familiar with, but which have played an important role.

The blog entry also has this populist proclamation:

As we worked to build this feature, we were struck by how readable and
accessible these opinions are. Court opinions don't just describe a
decision but also present the reasons that support the decision. In
doing so, they explain the intricacies of law in the context of
real-life situations. And they often do it in language that is
surprisingly straightforward, even for those of us outside the legal
profession. In many cases, judges have gone quite a bit out of their
way to make complex legal issues easy to follow. For example, in Korematsu v. United States,
the Supreme Court justices present a fascinating and easy-to-follow
debate on the legality of internment of natural born citizens based on
their ancestry.