(NaturalNews) While UK citizens were revolting en masse against bureaucratic rule in Europe, another cabal of prostituted lawmakers were busy plotting against American food consumers. According to this announcement from the United States Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, committee leaders have reached a “bipartisan agriculture biotechnology compromise solution.”

What exactly is this so-called “compromise?”

The complete banning of all GMO labeling state laws across America.

And that’s just for starters. After that, this new “compromise” decrees that no foods shall be GMO labeled for two years while the USDA ponders the best way to deceive consumers and hide Monsanto’s GMOs for another few years. The suggested law also gives the USDA the right to decree that any foods with less than 50% bioengineered content could be considered non-GMO, by the way.

Wednesday, April 09, 2014 by: Jonathan Benson

(NaturalNews) A little-known study out of New Zealand that was published back in 1992 makes a strong case for the fact that unvaccinated children are generally healthier and less prone to disease than vaccinated children. Contrary to what is popularly assumed about vaccines — that they protect kids by building immunity that otherwise would not exist — this research shows that vaccinated children are actually much more likely to suffer from chronic diseases like asthma, eczema, tonsillitis and a host of other health conditions, compared to their unvaccinated peers.

An excerpt from the study linked through VacTruth.com explains the research, which was conducted by the Immunization Awareness Society. Questionnaires were distributed to members of the group, their friends and colleagues, and others, asking about vaccination status and things like whether or not they breastfed their children, what they fed them, and which diseases were present. More than 245 families responded to the survey, providing data on 495 total children.

Of this number, 226 of the children had been vaccinated in accordance with government recommendations, while the remaining 269 were vaccine-free. Ages of participants ranged from just two weeks old to 46 years old. And 81 of the participating families also had both vaccinated and unvaccinated children, offering an even more direct comparison within households of potential variances in disease rates and frequency.

“Respondents were asked to provide the year of birth, gender, vaccinations received, whether or not the child suffered from a range of chronic conditions (asthma, eczema, ear infections/glue ear, recurring tonsillitis, hyperactivity, diabetes and epilepsy) whether or not he or she had needed grommets, had had a tonsillectomy, or were slow to develop motor skills (walking, crawling, sitting-up etc.),” wrote Sue Claridge in a report on the study.

“Parents also provided information on breastfeeding and bottle feeding and when a child was weaned if breastfed,” she added.

Monday, April 25, 2016 by: J. D. Heyes

(NaturalNews) In recent years there have been increasing reports that “smart meters” – the digitized electric meters that are designed to send usage figures to power companies wirelessly – are causing a range of health issues among a growing portion of the population where such devices are in use.

In fact, notes the EMF Safety Network, a growing number of people from around the world are beginning to report health problems they believe are related to an increased amount of wireless radiation from various devices, including smart meters.

“Utilities claim smart meters are safe, and compare them to cell phones. However, cell phones, cell towers, wi-fi and other wireless devices can also affect your health,” the organization states on its website. “Reducing your EMF exposure can benefit your overall health and wellness.”

The group also notes that the World Health Organization has classified radiation as a 2B carcinogen, and based that declaration on studies that have linked cell phone radiation to brain tumors.

(NaturalNews) America is being doused every minute of every day with the toxic heavy metal lead as it is burned in “avgas” — aviation gas, the fuel that powers most piston-driven aircraft (i.e. anything with a propeller). A grand total of 571 tons of lead are dumped each year into the air over our heads from aircraft alone, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1)

According to a scientific paper titled, “Lead and Halogen Contamination from Aviation Fuel Additives at Brackett Airfield,” (2) X-Ray Fluorescence instrumentation was used to analyze lead, chlorine and bromine content in avgas liquids. The tests showed avgas contains the following:

Lead: 48 ppm
Bromine: 42.6 ppm
Chlorine: 605.2 ppm

Lead is a highly toxic heavy metals that causes bone diseases, brain damage and cancer. Chlorine is a highly-reactive chemical with powerful oxidative properties. The fact that both are being sprayed daily into the air above America is inexcusable.

964 tons of lead released into the air (from all sources)

How much lead is being “chemtrailed” across America due to aviation fuel? According to General Aviation News (3), about 681,000 gallons of avgas were burned each day in 2013.

Avgas weighs approximately 6 lbs per gallon, meaning over 4 million pounds of avgas is burned each day, or over 1.8 million kg of avgas.

If lead is 48 ppm in avgas, that means each kg of avgas contains 48 mg of lead. Multiplied by the 1.8 million kg of avgas burned each day, this means avgas fuel is emitting 86.4 kg of lead PER DAY in the skies over our heads. Over a year, that’s 31,536 kg of lead dumped directly into our air, and that lead falls onto our farming soils, forests, lakes, rivers, streams, oceans, children’s playgrounds, cattle ranches, and so on.

The National Emissions Inventory says that lead emissions are even higher than what I’ve calculated here. “Piston-engine aircraft are the chief source of lead emissions in the United States, emitting 57% of the 964 tons of lead put into the air in 2008, according to the most recent figures from the National Emissions Inventory,” reports the NIH. (4)

Saturday, January 31, 2015 by: Joel Edwards(NaturalNews) For years we have been told that getting cold has nothing to do with catching a cold. It turns out science was wrong, and Mom’s common sense was right. It’s a great example of how flawed science can be. The good news is that scientists have finally discovered why colder temperatures can lead to viruses.

During cold weather your nasal passages tend to dry out. Mucus is one of the body’s first lines of defense against viruses. Ideally, pathogens become trapped in mucus and are later expelled or are swallowed or killed by stomach acid. During cold weather, this is less likely to happen.

Most strains of the rhinovirus, the virus responsible for the common cold, spread throughout your body more effectively at cooler temperatures. Infected cells often self-destruct. Warm cells in the body are more likely to self-destruct, stopping the viral invasion. Also warmer cells are more able to muster an effective immune response. Colder temperatures constrict blood vessels, inhibiting the transport of white blood cells to infected areas. In one study, a four-degree difference in Celsius temperature made nasal cells in mice less able to fend off invading viruses. In another study, cooler temperatures spread viruses from guinea pig to guinea pig more effectively than in warmer temperatures. While human beings are not guinea pigs or mice, we are all mammals, and we all get colds. We are all more prone to catch colds at cooler temperatures.

Sunday, February 07, 2016 by: Jennifer Lea Reynolds

(NaturalNews) In news that just about left us falling off our chairs, the mainstream media seems to be leaning toward the conclusion that dirty games and evil tactics may be behind the massive string of Chipotle’s E. coli outbreaks.

Specifically, The New York Times recently published an article carrying the headline, “C.D.C. Ends Chipotle Case With Illness Still a Mystery.” That “mystery,” of course, is the fact that although investigations into the E. coli outbreaks were conducted by the CDC, the real cause of them still remains unknown. This very well may be as close as we’ve seen mainstream media come to actually raising the possibility of biotech industry food terrorism in this particular case.

This document describes nothing less than a global government takeover of every nation across the planet. The “goals” of this document are nothing more than code words for a corporate-government fascist agenda that will imprison humanity in a devastating cycle of poverty while enriching the world’s most powerful globalist corporations like Monsanto and DuPont.

In the interests of helping wake up humanity, I’ve decided to translate the 17 points of this 2030 agenda so that readers everywhere can understand what this document is really calling for. To perform this translation, you have to understand how globalists disguise their monopolistic agendas in “feel good” language.

Here’s the point-by-point translation. Notice carefully that nowhere does this document state that “achieving human freedom” is one of its goals. Nor does it explain HOW these goals are to be achieved. As you’ll see here, every single point in this UN agenda is to be achieved through centralized government control and totalitarian mandates that resemble communism.