Posted by bistiza on 7/12/2013 9:55:00 AM (view original):What a surprise you attack tec, genghisxcon, since it's incredibly likely you either ARE bad_luck with another user name or are somehow closely acquainted with him. I established that long ago, so I just wanted to make sure tec and others are aware of it here.

Let's put it bluntly: If you've ever disagreed with BL on anything, I've never seen it, and plenty of people disagree with BL so it shouldn't be hard to find an instance of you doing it.

I've argued with tec too but I don't think he's half as bad as you make him out to be. Give the guy some credit; he defends what he believes in and he's not doing a bad job.

To my knowledge, bad_luck and I agree that...

1) ...you're narcissistic and delusional. That's hardly basis for claiming that we're the same person. Even tec agrees.
2) ...young earth theory is bunk. See above. Also, see any credible scientist.
3) ...gay marriage should be legal. Over half the country agrees.

It seems that there are a lot of potential aliases, according to your way of thinking.

I almost forgot, we disagreed on who was more disconnected from reality, you or swampy. Now, of course, the point is moot. Long may you reign.

Posted by tecwrg on 7/12/2013 10:08:00 AM (view original):Exactly what I have not defended?

Please answer the following:

Gay marriage should be illegal because __________.

Gay marriage should be illegal because human culture has defined marriage as being between one man and one woman.

That was my first word on the subject, and my final word on the subject. After 290 pages, I'm not going to revisit that discussion any longer.

That's kinda his point. You make this statement, and when asked to expand upon your reasoning on those thoughts, you really don't dive deeper. You kinda dodged a lot of questions, often by referring back to page 3 or whatever the first time you made this point.

It's like me saying if I said "food has always been X, I don't believe we should include all this fake manufactured stuff as food," and you asked "what's the harm in this change in definition" and I said "see my first statement. keeping this tradition is important to me" you might get frustrated.

Posted by tecwrg on 7/12/2013 10:08:00 AM (view original):Exactly what I have not defended?

Please answer the following:

Gay marriage should be illegal because __________.

Gay marriage should be illegal because human culture has defined marriage as being between one man and one woman.

That was my first word on the subject, and my final word on the subject. After 290 pages, I'm not going to revisit that discussion any longer.

That's kinda his point. You make this statement, and when asked to expand upon your reasoning on those thoughts, you really don't dive deeper. You kinda dodged a lot of questions, often by referring back to page 3 or whatever the first time you made this point.

It's like me saying if I said "food has always been X, I don't believe we should include all this fake manufactured stuff as food," and you asked "what's the harm in this change in definition" and I said "see my first statement. keeping this tradition is important to me" you might get frustrated.

I did expand on my reasoning. I said that it doesn't make sense to me to change an ages old definition on a whim. Doing anything on a whim is not necessarily a good idea.