Anatomy of the English-Only Movement
By James Crawford

English-only activism seemed to come out of nowhere in the 1980s, a
phenomenon that few living Americans had ever witnessed. Previously
no one had warned that the nation’s dominant language was endangered
by the encroachment of other tongues – creeping bilingualism – or that it
needed ‘legal protection’ in the United States. Suddenly there were legislative
campaigns to give English official status, an idea never proposed at
the federal level before 1981, and to restrict the public use of minority
languages. Such Official English measures have now been adopted by
twenty-three states. In 1996, for the first time, Congress voted on and the
House of Representatives approved a bill designating English as the
federal government’s sole language of official business.

Naturally the targets of this campaign – linguistic minorities, bilingual
educators, civil libertarians, Indian tribes, and others – regard restrictionist
legislation as a serious threat to their interests. Also not surprisingly,
they have tended to characterize the English-only movement as a
creature of the far right fringe of American politics, born of racial fear and
loathing. Since the mid-1980s, when I started reporting on such groups
and their activities, I have been asked whether they can be linked to identifiable
villains such as the Ku Klux Klan or the American Nazi Party.
Such connections would certainly be convenient for opponents. If the
English-only campaign could be exposed as an extremist conspiracy,
mobilizing against it would be a simple matter. Already this theme has
featured in counter-attacks. For the most part, however, it is a product of
wishful thinking.

True, the language-restriction movement did grow directly out of the
immigration-restriction movement, appealing to many of the same attitudes
and followers. The immigration-restriction movement, in turn, has
accepted support from eugenicists, Klan sympathizers, and other
defenders of white supremacy (Crawford, 1992a). Unsavory associations,
to be sure. As we shall see, these links have raised questions about the
hidden agenda of Official English. And rightly so. Yet I have uncovered
no evidence that groups promoting this campaign follow the leadership
or share the ideology of racial extremists.

For permission to download and reprint the :

After your payment is received, your Web browser will be redirected to a page with instructions on downloading and a password you will need to open the article. By clicking on the PayPal link above, you agree to reprint only the number of copies you have purchased. This permission may not be shared with others without violating the copyright. Also note that your purchase does not allow any electronic posting or other reproduction of the work on web sites, "electronic reserves," or similar media. Thanks for your cooperation in honoring this legal agreement.

To inquire about special rates for more than 25 reprints, please write to this address.