Welcome to the forum. I’m including quite a bit of information and references for you to read/view later, but you asked some very good questions and I wanted to try and provide a crash course in some of the things that those of us here are concerned with.

To be a White Nationalist doesn’t mean you have to hate or wish harm upon anyone. What it does mean is that you have a natural affinity and love for your own people, very much like one has for their own family.

I am friends, or have been friends with, people of all races but I don’t let that change my desire to know the truth and to understand the facts about the society in which I live.

Jewish people (2% of the population) have a great deal of power and influence in our society and are responsible for much of our liberal culture as well as the mind control doctrines of political correctness. Refer to this article for some very interesting facts about Jewish power outlined by our Vice President. http://ihr.org/other/biden_jewish_role

But that doesn’t mean that I reject all Jewish people, I just want to understand what’s really going on beneath the surface of our society. The article that I am copying below is from a Jewish author who I enjoy reading from time to time.

There are also some videos I’m including at the end of this post that will show you some other sides of the story that you will probably not be introduced to in school. Barbara Lerner Spectre explains how Jewish people are trying to force multiculturalism throughout the world with the effect of diluting the white race as much as possible. Although she does not say that is the goal, but only talks about their multicultural ambitions.

It has been theorized that the reason they are attempting this is because of what happened during WW2, they believe they will be safer as a people when there are no large white demographic populations anywhere in the world. They are thinking very selfishly in their determination to not allow our race to live together autonomously in any single country in North America or Europe.

Please select the link below for more information about WW2 and the Holocaust. The article begins with: “Within five minutes, any intelligent, open-minded person can be convinced that the Holocaust gassings of World War II are a profitable hoax.”

Only A Tiny Minority Of White Americans Ever Owned Slaves, And Others Gave Their Lives To Free Them

Only a tiny minority of Americans ever owned slaves. This is true even for those who lived in the ante-bellum South where only one white in five was a slaveholder. Why should their descendants owe a debt? What about the descendants of the 350,000 Union soldiers who died to free the slaves? They gave their lives. What possible moral principle would ask them to pay (through their descendants) again?

Reparations To African Americans Have Already Been Paid

Since the passage of the Civil Rights Acts and the advent of the Great Society in 1965, trillions of dollars in transfer payments have been made to African-Americans in the form of welfare benefits and racial preferences (in contracts, job placements and educational admissions) - all under the rationale of redressing historic racial grievances. It is said that reparations are necessary to achieve a healing between African-Americans and other Americans. If trillion dollar restitutions and a wholesale rewriting of American law (in order to accommodate racial preferences) for African-Americans is not enough to achieve a "healing," what will?

What About The Debt Blacks Owe To America?

Slavery existed for thousands of years before the Atlantic slave trade was born, and in all societies.

But in the thousand years of its existence, there never was an anti-slavery movement until white Christians - Englishmen and Americans -- created one. If not for the anti-slavery attitudes and military power of white Englishmen and Americans, the slave trade would not have been brought to an end. If not for the sacrifices of white soldiers and a white American president who gave his life to sign the Emancipation Proclamation, blacks in America would still be slaves.

If not for the dedication of Americans of all ethnicities and colors to a society based on the principle that all men are created equal, blacks in America would not enjoy the highest standard of living of blacks anywhere in the world, and indeed one of the highest standards of living of any people in the world. They would not enjoy the greatest freedoms and the most thoroughly protected individual rights anywhere. Where is the gratitude of black America and its leaders for those gifts?

If you are interested then there are a couple of really good non-hagiographic books on MLK out there.

For example Pappas' (1994) 'The Martin Luther King Jr. Plagiarism Story', which documents the fact that King was a serial plagiarist and exposes a couple of other little factoids about him as well. Pappas being the chap who first uncovered it and it is something which is almost universally admitted about King these days except by a few die-hard hagiographers.

As for the 'Institutional Racism' claims: well ask your sister the following simple questions.

A) If 'Institutional Racism' is the true cause then why does it disproportionately hit Hispanics and Negroes, but not similarly disproportionately hit Asians, Indians, Native Americans and Jews?

B) Why are Negro and Mexican neighborhoods places that are run down, but yet White neighborhoods of a similar Socio-Economic status not similarly so?

C) Why; if 'Institutional Racism' is the true cause, have we seen a heightening of racial violence and disproportionate Negro and Mexican crime in today's climate of enforced anti-racist and pro-minority doctrine?

D) And perhaps the most deadly question of all: what objective (not subjective) evidence does your sister have that these levels of criminality are linked to 'Institutional Racism' and how does she quantify the level of 'Institutional Racism' statistically so as to allow her to make her argument?

I wrote to you previously in this topic, but since you asked about black crime rates and if it was based on institutional racism I wanted to add two more videos.

Usually Ramzpaul uses humor in his videos about political correctness (cultural Marxism). But the video on Japanese vs. Black behavior after an earthquake is serious and the video about Tim Wise who is Jewish and promotes diversity and multiculturalism is also more serious than his usual videos but I thought you might be interested in seeing them.

You have to watch the second video about Tim Wise all the way through to understand what he's trying to say. Otherwise you could be misled.

The question then becomes why is the understanding of racial differences being suppressed. As you'll soon see on this site, the world has some very, very big problems that are going to cause a catastrophe.

.
.
It was not until the 1965 Immigration Act that the U.S. Congress ignored the majority's wishes and began a policy that discriminated against potential European immigrants, and encouraged massive non-European immigration. From that time forward, the federal government also showed less willingness to enforce our immigration laws and police our borders. These policies resulted in a flood of non-White immigrants, legal and illegal. Immigration and higher non-White birthrates have transformed the American population from almost 90 percent European in the early 1960s to less than 70 percent at the end of the century. The U.S. Census Bureau has predicted that by the middle of the 21st century, well within the lifetime of many reading these words, European Americans will be a minority in the United States. We are already a minority in most of America's major cities and will soon be outnumbered in California and Texas. Policies similar to those enacted in the U.S. have introduced large numbers of non-Europeans into Canada; Negroes into Britain; North Africans and Asians into France; Turks into Germany; and a potpourri of alien races into Scandinavia, Spain, and Italy.

As I grew racially aware, it was certainly obvious to me that the new immigration policies of the United States and Europe would greatly damage Western societies. Only a short time after the change in immigration policy, crime problems escalated in all the affected nations. The quality of education suffered and social welfare problems increased. As this planned racial transformation accelerates, these ills will reach catastrophic proportions.

What groups had anything to gain from this demographic Armageddon? The individual foreigners who could benefit from the economic opportunities afforded by the Western societies had little political or economic clout while outside the Western nations. As I looked into the American fight over immigration laws during the last 100 years, the driving force behind opening America's borders became evident: It was organized Jewry, personified by the poet Emma Lazarus whose lines I quoted to begin the chapter.

By the time I was a junior in high school, I had become convinced that massive non-European immigration poised the greatest short and long-term threat to the America that I loved. I saw that the Immigration Act of 1965, unless repealed, would eventually sound the death knell for my country. Much of the material I read pointed to a long history of organized Jewish efforts to radically change America's immigration laws. I contacted Drew Smith, an elderly New Orleans attorney who had authored The Legacy of the Melting Pot, and who had already taught me a lot about the immigration issue.

Smith and I met one rainy day after school at the Citizens Council offices. He explained the history of American immigration law. After quoting the Lazarus lines from the base of the Statue of Liberty, he asked me, "Whose interest could have been served in having America flooded with `wretched refuse'?" He quickly answered his own question. "It was in the perceived interest of a cohesive people who use racial solidarity like a weapon, a weapon they want only for themselves. The efforts to change the American immigration law and ultimately displace the European majority has been led almost exclusively by Jews."

Smith explained that Emma Lazarus - like many other immigration activists - was a Jewish partisan who supported the creation of an exclusively Jewish Zionist state in Palestine, but who supported "diversity" for America. He pointed out to me how Jews such as Lazarus have even changed the modern meaning of the Statue of Liberty. The beautiful jade-colored colossus had no original connection with immigration and predated the Ellis Island immigration center. It was a gift from France to commemorate the American Revolution, not to honor the arrival of "wretched refuse" on America's shores. It is instructive to note that this beautiful statue of European Womanhood faces not to Africa, Asia or South America, but the land where she was born, France and Europe itself.

Emma Lazarus had been best known for her fulminations against Russia's pogroms following the assassination of Czar Alexander II in 1881. The irony is rich: A Jewish supremacist dedicated to the creation of an elite Jewish State in Palestine was anxious to turn America into a refuge for the castoffs of the world. Drew Smith owned many books on the immigration issue, including some by Jews, in which he had underlined important passages. I borrowed them and passionately delved into them.

My parents brought me up to not be prejudiced against anyone and I'm not. But those numbers . . . wow.

Thanks.

I'm sure your parents meant well, that was what we were told to tell Children.
But it is like living in the forest and being told that Wolves and Bears are just nice little animals trying to get along.
It does not prepare you for the realities of life in the forest.

Here is a good video, it's a bit strong, but it does not beat about the bush either.
It calls a spade a spade.

I'm assuming you are female because of the mixed guy texting you. I just want to warn you to be careful. Back in my younger, more liberal days (highschool) we had a mixed friend who's entire game was to get white girls to sleep with him by being super nice. If they didn't want to then he would call them "racist" until they broke down and did it. The word Racist is used as a weapon against us. He even ended up pulling a gun on a white guy who tried to step in and defend a girl. This site is full of examples of "really nice" black guys that flip out and hurt white girls when their ego's are wounded. In fact, to this day, I have never met a black male that even communicated with white females for any other reason than to ultimately sleep with them. They are REALLY good at making them think that isn't the case though, and that they are just being harmless and friendly. White women are trophies for them.

This brings me to my feelings on the whole crime thing: I think it boils down to the fact that blacks simply have less self control than whites or asians do. They lack that certain internal strength to not act on impulse, whether it be violent, sexual, or both.

Obviously I am speaking generally. Not everyone is the same, but I think that by and large, black people tend to be less diverse. They think and behave very similar to each other without much variation. Anyway, you don't need to mess with any of that. Be happhy with who you are, and help your own people when you can. Don't let the system try and make you feel like an inferior person because of history or the color of your skin. You are your own person with the ability to free-think. All races are guilty of the most extreme examples of evil that humanity has to offer. Learn true white history. Know what we have suffered through to get here and know that we have earned it.

As far as MLK. It's great that he was trying to help his people. Do some digging though. He wasn't the most wonderful of a person. He was a frequent beater of white prostitutes.

This brings me to my feelings on the whole crime thing: I think it boils down to the fact that blacks simply have less self control than whites or asians do. They lack that certain internal strength to not act on impulse, whether it be violent, sexual, or both.

Their lack of impulse control is 100% genetic. It's so obvious with every chimp out they have. They are an irrational and borderline retarded people and the fact that their frontal lobes are considerably smaller than whites reinforces this reality.

Anybody who says it's "because of poverty" is nothing but an ignorant tool parroting what the mainstream tells them is right. None of them question it, and the only ones who do are people like us and people like the OP who genuinely want to know the truth. Why do we not see whites killing each other off in trailer parks? Why did poor white immigrants at a time when there was no minimum wage, no welfare, and no section 8 housing and absolutely nothing handed to them not go out and do things like this??

Okay so I accidentally came by this website at the weekend. I'm writing a school paper on Martin Luther King and some searches on the subject of racism led me here. I'm 17. I read some of the stuff here and I gotta say I was shocked really. I thought you guys were a bunch of nasty creeps when i first came here. Then I read some of the crime stats . . . DAMN! Really? Blacks make up such a small percentage of the population and they commit the majority of crimes? I always knew that blacks had the stereotype of being criminals and whatnot but I never really thought it was completely true. I mean I knew it must be bad in the deep ghettos but I never thought it was that bad!!!

I spoke to my sister about it (she's 20 and studying law) and she said the stats are like that cause the judiciary system is institutionally racist. She said until 2010, five grams of crack cocaine got five years minimum and five hundred grams of powder cocaine got five years minimum. She said blacks are far more likely to use crack cocaine and whites are far more likely to use powder cocaine (she also said powder cocaine is used more than crack in this country) yet crack was the drug that had disproportionate sentencing in comparison to powder cocaine. She also gave other examples of first time black offenders on non-violent drug charges getting ridiculous sentences. She showed me a case of a black woman who had never committed a crime getting 75 years simply because her cousins had stashed some drugs in the garage of the house she was living in. She had nothing to do with whatever they were doing and she wasn't released until she did 15 years after she was found not guilty. I'm not really educated in the details of drugs (I've smoked a joint before at a party but I hated it and will never do it again cause it's disgusting) but to me that does seem really unfair. Rapists and murderers do far less time than 75 years. And it wasn't even as if the woman had a criminal record in the past.

But I also know that those stats can't be all down to racism. My sister also said poverty is a factor and while I'm sure that's true, I'm sure there are a lot of white people who live in poverty too in this country yet their numbers aren't as bad as those stats. Thing is i'm not a racist at all. In fact I was determined to write the biggest, most kickass MLK paper ever. But reading that stuff has kinda left me a bit uncertain of things. I feel pretty bad tbh. At my school there are some black people I get along with and there's a biracial guy from another school I've been texting a lot. I live near a middle/upper class neighbourhood that has quite a few black families and they aren't ghetto or whatever. I hang out with some of them. My parents brought me up to not be prejudiced against anyone and I'm not. But those numbers . . . wow. They've left me with a strange feeling in my heart and stomach. I don't really know what it is. It's just a strange feeling. Like a sensation. Maybe someone else here is familiar with it? I haven't been texting the black guy (well he's not black really cause his dad's white) as much as I did before coming onto this site and reading that stuff.

I don't know. Maybe a bit of advice? I like contrasting opinions. My sister told me one side of the story and I'm sure you've got an opposite side of the story to tell. And please no racial epithets/insults or anything like that. Just tell me your side.

Thanks.

The young people are being groomed(indoctrination) with false information. Crime is not a by-product of poverty. If you were to walk in a all black area chances are you would be singled out for a crime because you're white. When blacks go out to commit crimes they will seek out other races but they rather violate a white, to know this is not racist, it could mean life or death.
Man in coma after black mob of 50 pummels himMan in coma after black mob of 50 pummels him

Quote:

There were 806,316 homicides in the US between 1965 and 2004, and 588,611 of them were committed by blacks, of which 179,808 were blacks who murdered Whites. 322,526 of these homicides were not cleared, and only 483,790 were cleared, and of those Whites murdered by blacks, 43,541 were cleared and 136,267 were not cleared. In just four decades, American blacks killed almost as many Whites as were killed in WWII, four times as many Whites as were killed in Vietnam, and 60 times as many Whites as were killed in 911 or Iraq

They want the white mans world but they don't want the white man in it, they seem to think that white civilizations are products of mother nature and therefore they're entitled to them as much as we are.
It's not racism when you describe actual characteristics of a race
Thank you all who gave me a rep and this extends into the future.