If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Bristol Palin, an advocate of abstinence education over comprehensive sex education, is back in the headlines today after signing a contract with Harper Collins imprint Morrow to publish her memoir Not Afraid of Life.

I think we've come full circle on this issue, and can actually agree on the above. The tax laws need a changin'......I know I take full advantage of all legal means to lower my taxable income, as does everyone else here.

I had a tax proffessor many years ago who was retired from the IRS. He told our class that if you or the company you are working for is not getting audited at least once every 5 years you must not be maximizing your deductions. Personally, I'm willing to miss a few to aviod an audit.

I was responding to luv's comment about her not wanting to pay for other people's kids and I gave an example of how well abstinence works what's wrong with that????????????

How about this, since the discussion was never about abstinence... We the taxpayers, aren't paying for Bristol Palin's child, she is not receiving a govt. check every month! And it's especially offensive coming from someone who is firmly fastened to the public teat himself.

I was responding to luv's comment about her not wanting to pay for other people's kids and I gave an example of how well abstinence works what's wrong with that????????????

Roger,
I never stated any opinion on sex education. Why make a statement that may well have nothing to do with my opinion on that subject?
You do not know how I feel about the subject other than what I have stated.
What I have said is that I should not pay for anyone elses kids.
If you can't afford them don't breed them. That does not mean that I am against teaching birth control. It means that POP IT OUT PAY FOR IT!