Dinosaurs, those fascinating and mysterious creatures beg the question: where do they fit into the Bible? Evolution says dinosaurs fit into history millions of years ago. The Bible says that land animals (which would include dinosaurs) were created on Day 6 (the same day as people). Which view does science support? Get ready for amazing evidence showing that dinosaurs lived recently, just like the Bible says.

Related articles - What about dinosaurs? (Chapter 19 from The Creation Answers Book) (http://creation.com/images/pdfs/cabook/chapter19.pdf) - How did dinosaurs grow so big? And how did Noah fit them on the Ark? (http://creation.com/how-did-dinosaurs-grow-so-big) - Dracorex —the dinosaur that looks like a dragon. (http://creation.com/dracorexthe-dinosaur-that-looks-like-a-dragon) - Squirming at Squishosaur (http://creation.com/squishosaur) - 'Schweitzer's Dangerous Discovery' (http://creation.com/schweit)

Feedback - Dinosaurs, dating and the age of the earth (http://creation.com/dinosaurs-dating-and-the-age-of-the-earth) - Where are all the human fossils? (Chapter 15 from the The Creation Answers Book) (http://creation.com/images/pdfs/cabook/chapter15.pdf)

In the early nineties, researchers from Montana State University made a startling discovery. Inspecting a piece of T. rex bone under a microscope, they could hardly believe their eyes—they could see dinosaur red blood cells!This discovery prompted lead scientist, Dr Mary Schweitzer, to say:'It was exactly like looking at a slice of modern bone. But, of course, I couldn't believe it. I said to the lab technician: "The bones, after all, are 65 million years old. How could blood cells survive that long?"'In a Discover magazine article, Dr Schweitzer explained further her surprise, 'If you take a blood sample and you stick it on a shelf, you have nothing recognizable in about a week. So why would there be anything left in dinosaurs?'Such a response is understandable, considering that she thinks dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago. But surely such data suggest it wasn't that long ago?

Related Articles:Dinosaur tissue: still soft and stretchy (http://creation.com/still-soft-and-stretchy)Dinosaur soft tissue and protein—even more confirmation! (http://creation.com/dinosaur-soft-tissue-and-protein-even-more-confirmation)DNA and bone cells found in dinosaur bone (http://creation.com/dino-dna-bone-cells)A fossil is a fossil is a fossil. Right? (http://creation.com/a-fossil-is-a-fossil-is-a-fossil-right)Dinosaur bones—just how old are they really? (http://creation.com/dinosaur-bonesjust-how-old-are-they-really)

an interveiw with the people who were involved in the find and research on the t-rex bone that has blood and elastic tissue in it.

The evidence that hemoglobin has indeed survived in this dinosaur bone (which casts immense doubt upon the 'millions of years' idea) is, to date, as follows:

The tissue was coloured reddish brown, the colour of hemoglobin, as was liquid extracted from the dinosaur tissue. Hemoglobin contains heme units. Chemical signatures unique to heme were found in the specimens when certain wavelengths of laser light were applied. Because it contains iron, heme reacts to magnetic fields differently from other proteins—extracts from this specimen reacted in the same way as modem heme compounds. To ensure that the samples had not been contaminated with certain bacteria which have heme (but never the protein hemoglobin), extracts of the dinosaur fossil were injected over several weeks into rats. If there was even a minute amount of hemoglobin present in the T. Rex sample, the rats' immune system should build up detectable antibodies against this compound. This is exactly what happened in carefully controlled experiments.

Evidence of hemoglobin, and the still-recognizable shapes of red blood cells, in unfossilized dinosaur bone is powerful testimony against the whole idea of dinosaurs living millions of years ago. It speaks volumes for the Bible's account of a recent creation.

For more information, read the full article: http://creationtoday.org/why-does-the-bible-mention-unicorns/

This article has all the details that are not discussed in this video. Paul Taylor at CSE asked me to write it for their website.

Check out another video I made explaining how long the Israelites were in Egypt:https://youtube.com/watch?v=FF0F8YjT1og

Click here to watch another video that I made about the supposed contradiction in the genealogy of Jesus: http://youtube.com/watch?v=U3bsAMyRwbw

To see another video that I made about Jesus' genealogy, which deals with the curse on the line of Jeconiah, click here: http://youtube.com/watch?v=p4v1UEZb3Z0

Also, feel free to check out my newest video called: "Were the Pyramids Built Before the Flood?"https://youtube.com/watch?v=VI1yRTC6kGE

Why Does the Bible Mention Unicorns?

One day I just decided to sit down and really figure this out.

Now, some people think that the Bible is talking about the mythical unicorn, like the ones portrayed in Charlie the Unicorn: http://youtube.com/watch?v=Q5im0Ssyyus

And so they make fun of the Bible, and make fun of the Creation Museum by making websites like "The Unicorn Museum" http://unicornmuseum.org

But if the Bible is really scientifically and historically accurate, then why would it mention a mythical animal?

I've listened to Creation Scientists answer this question before, but they said they weren't certain what a unicorn was. Instead they said things like, "Probably it's a dinosaur" like in this video:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=MO0ibz_KUN0 (6 min. 4 sec.)

But what's the real answer?

So I looked up the word unicorn in Noah Webster's 1828 dictionary and it said that this name is often applied to the rhinoceros. It said absolutely nothing about a horse.

So then I looked up the word unicorn in the Webster's New World dictionary and it said it was a mythical horselike animal.

What a difference in definitions!

Then I looked up rhinoceros in the 1828 dictionary and it said that unicorn was the name of the one horned species of the rhinoceros, and bicornis was the name of the two horned species.

Then I found out that the scientific name of the Asian One-Horned Rhinoceros is Rhinoceros unicornis. Then I found out that Diceros bicornis is the scientific name of a two horned rhinoceros called the black rhinoceros.

Then I found out that there is a book online called "The Return of the Unicorns: The Natural History and Conservation of the Greater One Horned Rhinoceros" by Eric Dinerstein.

Then I found out that there is an extinct one-horned rhinoceros called Elasmotherium Sibiricum which scientists today call The Giant Unicorn according to this website:

http://animalcorner.co.uk/wildlife/rhinos/rhino_history.html

and this website:

http://lonympics.co.uk/unic.htm

Then I found out that Ken Ham at Answers in Genesis believes the Elasmotherium might be the unicorn in the Bible, although he isn't for sure.

Then I found out that the Latin bible actually uses the word rinoceros when the King James uses the word unicorn.

So, I was rather surprised when Creation Scientists said they weren't for sure exactly what the unicorn in the bible was.

So I thought I'd make a video and throw in my two cents as to what I found in order to stop the confusion and help out some Creation Scientists with evidence that perhaps they weren't aware of.

I used Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended, After Effects Pro, Premiere Pro, and Soundbooth.

And for those who are wondering whether or not the verse in Deuteronomy 33 was really translated incorrectly into the King James, then I would suggest watching these videos:

Hello friend :’-) Here is the latter half of the Disney World trip I took, now over a month ago. Thank you for watching, and reading this, I appreciate everything endlessly. Being able to tell stories or share my memories with you is a blessing, and so many things wouldn’t be if not for this. I hope you can take a piece of happiness that I am sending to you. My spring term so far has been great, I can’t wait to catch up in terms of present-day school vlogs, or just updates in general. After the break, returning back to a new term in school was really like picking it back up running with no time to pause. (thank goodness for the weekend). I am learning so much, and despite the long hours of laborious work I know how lucky I am to have this education.Wherever you may be, I hope you are well, and that you continue to take care of yourself. We have those we love so much, but it is above all important to remember to nurture our own bodies and spirits so that we can live presently, the best we can, alongside those we love most.

FTC disclaimer- not a sponsored video. Some links are affiliate links. Products that are gifted to me from kind friends at various brands are labeled with (*). All opinions and statements are 100% my own. Have a lovely day.

▶0:00

📺 Dinosaurs and the Bible (Creation Magazine LIVE! 1-11)

Dinosaurs, those fascinating and mysterious creatures beg the question: where do they fit into the Bible? Evolution says dinosaurs fit into history millions of years ago. The Bible says that land animals (which would include dinosaurs) were created on Day 6 (the same day as people). Which view does science support? Get ready for amazing evidence showing that dinosaurs lived recently, just like the Bible says.

Related articles
- What about dinosaurs? (Chapter 19 from The Creation Answers Book) (http://creation.com/images/pdfs/cabook/chapter19.pdf)
- How did dinosaurs grow so big? And how did Noah fit them on the Ark? (http://creation.com/how-did-dinosaurs-grow-so-big)
- Dracorex —the dinosaur that looks like a dragon. (http://creation.com/dracorexthe-dinosaur-that-looks-like-a-dragon)
- Squirming at Squishosaur (http://creation.com/squishosaur)
- 'Schweitzer's Dangerous Discovery' (http://creation.com/schweit)

Feedback
- Dinosaurs, dating and the age of the earth (http://creation.com/dinosaurs-dating-and-the-age-of-the-earth)
- Where are all the human fossils? (Chapter 15 from the The Creation Answers Book) (http://creation.com/images/pdfs/cabook/chapter15.pdf)