Must Read: RIM exec sends open letter on conditions within company

BGR has posted an open letter from a high-level RIM executive, one that touches on the conditions within the company as its share price, morale and brand reputation all fall to multi-year lows.

The letter in itself is kind of long, but a must read if you have been following the fall of RIM from grace starting in 2008 with the launch of the iPhone 3G and the start of Android.

In his letter, the exec posts a number of "bullet points" on what the company should do in the short-term that will lead to long-term results for the smartphone maker.

Afterwards, I have posted RIM's official response to the letter, which comes off as weak. It is clear the top executives are comfortable with their plan for the future, which practically calls the last 3 years a "transitory period" and little else.

A few numbers to keep in mind before reading:

- RIM's stock price has fallen to $28.80 a share, down from their all-time high of $144 in June 2008.
- RIM's U.S. market share (its bread-and-butter market) has fallen from over 60 percent in 2007 to 21 percent, as of yesterday.

The letter:

To the RIM Senior Management Team:

I have lost confidence.

While I hide it at work, my passion has been sapped. I know I am not alone — the sentiment is widespread and it includes people within your own teams.

Mike and Jim, please take the time to really absorb and digest the content of this letter because it reflects the feeling across a huge percentage of your employee base. You have many smart employees, many that have great ideas for the future, but unfortunately the culture at RIM does not allow us to speak openly without having to worry about the career-limiting effects.

Before I get into the meat of the matter, I will say I am not part of a large group of bitter employees wishing to embarrass us. Rather, I believe these points need to be heard and I desperately want RIM to regain its position as a successful industry leader. Our carriers, distributors, alliance partners, enterprise customers, and our loyal end users all want the same thing… for BlackBerry to once again be leading the pack.

We are in the middle of major “transition” and things have never been more chaotic. Almost every project is falling further and further behind schedule at a time when we absolutely must deliver great, solid products on time. We urge you to make bold decisions about our organisational structure, about our culture and most importantly our products.

While we anxiously wait to see the details of the streamlining plan, here are some suggestions:

1) Focus on the End User experience

Let’s obsess about what is best for the end user. We often make product decisions based on strategic alignment, partner requests or even legal advice — the end user doesn’t care. We simply have to admit that Apple is nailing this and it is one of the reasons they have people lining up overnight at stores around the world, and products sold out for months. These people aren’t hypnotized zombies, they simply love beautifully designed products that are user centric and work how they are supposed to work. Android has a major weakness — it will always lack the simplicity and elegance that comes with end-to-end device software, middleware and hardware control. We really have a great opportunity to build something new and “uniquely BlackBerry” with the QNX platform.

Let’s start an internal innovation revival with teams focused on what users will love instead of chasing “feature parity” and feature differentiation for no good reason (Adobe Flash being a major example). When was the last time we pushed out a significant new experience or feature that wasn’t already on other platforms?

Rather than constantly mocking iPhone and Android, we should encourage key decision makers across the board to use these products as their primary device for a week or so at a time — yes, on Exchange! This way we can understand why our users are switching and get inspiration as to how we can build our next-gen products even better! It’s incomprehensible that our top software engineers and executives aren’t using or deeply familiar with our competitor’s products.

2) Recruit Senior SW Leaders & enable decision-making

I’m going to say what everyone is thinking… We need some heavy hitters at RIM when it comes to software management. Teams still aren’t talking together properly, no one is making or can make critical decisions, all the while everyone is working crazy hours and still far behind. We are demotivated. Just look at who our major competitors are: Apple, Google & Microsoft. These are three of the biggest and most talented software companies on the planet. Then take a look at our software leadership teams in terms of what they have delivered and their past experience prior to RIM… It says everything.

3) Cut projects to the bone.

There is a serious need to consolidate our focus to just a handful of projects. Period.

We need to be disciplined here. We can’t afford any more initiatives based on carrier requests to squeeze out slightly more volume. Again, back to point #1, focus on the end users. They are the ones making both consumer & enterprise purchase decisions.

Strategy is often in the things you decide not to do.

On that note, we simply must stop shipping incomplete products that aren’t ready for the end user. It is hurting our brand tremendously. It takes guts to not allow a product to launch that may be 90% ready with a quarter end in sight, but it will pay off in the long term.

Look at Apple in 1997 for tips here. I really want you to watch this video because it has never been more relevant. It is our friend Steve Jobs in 97 and it may as well be you speaking to RIM employees and partners today. [ link ]

4) Developers, not Carriers can now make or break us

We urgently need to invest like we never have before in becoming developer friendly. The return will be worth every cent. There is no polite way to say this, but it’s true — BlackBerry smartphone apps suck. Even PlayBook, with all its glorious power, looks like a Fisher Price toy with its Adobe AIR/Flash apps.

Developing for BlackBerry is painful, and despite what you’ve been told, things haven’t really changed that much since Jamie Murai’s letter. Our SDK / development platform is like a rundown 1990′s Ford Explorer. Then there’s Apple, which has a shiny new BMW M3… just such a pleasure to drive. Developers want and need quality tools.

If we create great tools, we will see great work. Offer shit tools and we shouldn’t be surprised when we see shit apps.

The truth is, no one in RIM dares to tell management how bad our tools still are. Even our closest dev partners do their best to say it politely, but they will never bite the hand that feeds them. The solution? Recruit serious talent, buy SDK/API specialist companies, throw a truckload of money at it… Let’s do whatever it takes, and quickly!

25 million iPad users don’t care that it doesn’t have Flash or true multitasking, so why make that a focus in our campaigns? I’ll answer that for you: it’s because that’s all that differentiates our products and its lazy marketing. I’ve never seen someone buy product B because it has something product A doesn’t have. People buy product B because they want and lust after product B.

Also an important note regarding our marketing: a product’s technical superiority does not equal desire, and therefore sales… How many Linux laptops are getting sold? How did Betamax go? My mother wants an iPad and iPhone because it is simple and appeals to her. Powerful multitasking doesn’t.

BlackBerry Messenger has been our standout, yet we wasted our marketing on strange stories from a barber shop to a horse wrangler. I promise you, this did nothing to help us in the mind of the average consumer.

We need an inventive and engaging campaign that focuses on what we are about. People buy into a brand / product not just because of features, but because of what it stands for and what it delivers to them. People don’t buy “what you do,” people buy “why you do it.” Take 3 minutes to watch the this video starting from the 2min mark: [ link ]

6) No Accountability – Canadians are too nice

RIM has a lot of people who underperform but still stay in their roles. No one is accountable. Where is the guy responsible for the 9530 software? Still with us, still running some important software initiative. We will never achieve excellence with this culture. Just because someone may have been a loyal RIM employee for 7 years, it doesn’t mean they are the best Manager / Director / VP for that role. It’s time to change the culture to deliver or move on and get out. We have far too many people in critical roles that fit this description. I can hear the cheers of my fellow employees now.

7) The press and analysts are pissing you off. Don’t snap. Now is the time for humility with a dash of paranoia.

The public’s questions about dual-CEOs are warranted. The partnership is not broken, but on the ground level, it is not efficient. Maybe we need our Eric Schmidt reign period.

Yes, four years ago we beat Microsoft when everyone said Windows Mobile with Direct Push in Exchange would kill us. It didn’t… in fact we grew stronger.

However, overconfidence clouds good decision-making. We missed not boldly reacting to the threat of iPhone when we saw it in January over four years ago. We laughed and said they are trying to put a computer on a phone, that it won’t work. We should have made the QNX-like transition then. We are now 3-4 years too late. That is the painful truth… it was a major strategic oversight and we know who is responsible.

Jim, in referring to our current transition recently said: “No other technology company other than Apple has successfully transitioned their platform. It’s almost never done, and it’s way harder than you realize. This transition is where tech companies go to die.”

To avoid this death, perhaps it is time to seriously consider a new, fresh thinking, experienced CEO. There is no shame in no longer being a CEO. Mike, you could focus on innovation. Jim, you could focus on our carriers/customers… They are our lifeblood.

8) Democratise. Engage and interact with your employees — please!

Reach out to all employees asking them on how we can make RIM better. Encourage input from ground-level teams—without repercussions—to seek out honest feedback and really absorb it.

Lastly, we’re all reading the news and many are extremely nervous, especially when we see people get fired. We need an injection of confidence: share your strategy and ask us for support. The headhunters have already started circling and we are at risk of losing our best people.

Now would be a great time to internally re-brand and re-energize the workplace. For example, rename the company to just “BlackBerry” to signify our new focus on one QNX product line. We should also address issues surrounding making RIM an enjoyable workplace. Some of our offices feel like Soviet-era government workplaces.

The timing is perfect to seriously evaluate at our position and make these major changes. We can do it!

Sincerely,

A RIM Employee

And RIM's official response:

An “Open Letter” to RIM’s senior management was published anonymously on the web today and it was attributed to an unnamed person described as a ‘high level employee”. It is obviously difficult to address anonymous commentary and it is particularly difficult to believe that a “high level employee” in good standing with the company would choose to anonymously publish a letter on the web rather than engage their fellow executives in a constructive manner, but regardless of whether the letter is real, fake, exaggerated or written with ulterior motivations, it is fair to say that the senior management team at RIM is nonetheless fully aware of and aggressively addressing both the company’s challenges and its opportunities.

RIM recently confirmed that it is nearing the end of a major business and technology transition. Although this transition has taken longer than anticipated, there is much excitement and optimism within the company about the new products that are lined up for the coming months. There is a fundamental business reality however that following an extended period of hyper growth (during which RIM nearly quadrupled in size over the past 5 years alone), it has become necessary for the company to streamline its operations in order to allow it to grow its business profitably while pursuing newer strategic opportunities. Again, RIM’s management team takes these challenges seriously and is actively addressing the situation. The company is thankfully in a solid business and financial position to tackle the opportunities ahead with a solid balance sheet (nearly $3 billion in cash and no debt), strong profitability (RIM’s net income last quarter was $695 million) and substantial international growth (international revenue in Q1 grew 67% over the same quarter last year). In fact, while growth has slowed in the US, RIM still shipped 13.2 million BlackBerry smartphones last quarter (which is about 100 smartphones per minute, 24 hours per day) and RIM is more committed than ever to serving its loyal customers and partners around the world.

12 user comments

Oddly all this reminds me of is the whole mission statement part from Jerry MacGuire. Who bets when the guy that wrote this gets fired he flips out, steals a goldfish and yells out "who's comin' with me?"

This guy sounds like a rabid iFan; he even goes so far as to say that apple users like the products because they work, and are not released in incomplete form...this simply isn't true; the iPhone4 still does not have a working antenna, and the iPhone5 is almost here! He also talks up their closed development tools, and completely ignors the fact that Android development tools are open and cross platform...if Apple's toos are a BMW M3, Android tools are a flying jet car.

He even seems to imply that Flash support is a bad thing that they shouldn't have, at the same time that he is saying that they should listen to the customers who want Flash support. Which is it? Later, he claims he has never seen someone buy anything based on features, only based on marketting...this is a bold lie. Even working at RIM (a company that does not offer features, only word-of-mouth advertising), I am guessing he has at least seen someone buy an Android rather than an iPhone.

I do agree with him on the product line cutbacks...they have tons of phones that are the same price as some other phone they make...they need an economy phone, a highend phone, and maybe a version of the highend phone with a physical keyboard...that is it. As for tablets, that gets a bit more complicated, but that is the arena where they currently only have one model; another model there would be a good thing.

As for the corporate structure, I can't really comment much as I don't work there. However, having two CEOs is never a good thing.

Well Apple is making more money than anyone else right now so what they're doing must be working. He's using Apple because it's the most direct comparison to RIM. Google and Microsoft just make the OS while Apple and RIM do hardware and the OS for their phones.

I can't speak very well to the technical points, but from a leadership standpoint, that was a real 'point-the-finger-then-hide-behind the couch" communication. It would have been much wiser to acknowledge some of the company's recent shortcomings and to do some internal & external PR to re-energize and re-engage their stakeholders.

However, instead of acknowledging the passion and caring in the tone of the original poster, they chose instead to write it off as one kooky employee who managed wriggle free long enough to holler from a window.

Originally posted by KillerBug:Apple is also losing ground faster than anyone, including RIM. This is not what you want to emulate when you are trying to get customers.

Apple may be losing ground right now in the smartphone market but until they suddenly stop coming up with innovations and products that work, apple will see it's growth continue, as it has for the past decade.

Originally posted by xnmalletx:Apple may be losing ground right now in the smartphone market but until they suddenly stop coming up with innovations and products that work, apple will see it's growth continue, as it has for the past decade.

They have, no? As everyone stated above, the $600 iPhone 4's antenna is still a mockery, and I think their last innovation was multi-tasking and their next one will probably be Flash lmao

Well what do you know...? I've been pissing & moaning about just such a thing concerning corporate America for how long? And just "Now" someone 'looks' like they're a trend setter & "oh so forward thinking" in the corporate structure to say what needs to be said?

Give me a f&$#ing break. The God Kings are still drunk & strung out on their high. Even when times get bad enough that the Kings can no longer get heroin they'll just move on to methadone or another designer drug... point being, they're never going to care. Call it "Tucker: The Man & His Dream" or the Jerry Maguire reference the other folks were making; until the emperors have fallen they'll have learned nothing. What am I saying? They won't learn anything either. They'll deny & cry. Those beneath might behave & prosperity will reign for a little while, but then someone else will come along and start pissing in the pool again.

I feel for the individual who wrote the letter. When I worked for Universal I was a mouthy MFer & didn't care who I stood before and deliver the riot act. But I could also deliver the moon. This blanket letter is wonderful & awe inspiring, but if you don't have the balls to stand in front of the council & deliver it in person... Put a face to the claim; it's meaningless.

Originally posted by KillerBug: This guy sounds like a rabid iFan; he even goes so far as to say that apple users like the products because they work, and are not released in incomplete form...this simply isn't true; the iPhone4 still does not have a working antenna,