Cheaptubeaudio has had a long history of advocating reasonably priced but excellent tube gears, particularly Singled-Ended Triodes. I believe SET and horns together bring about the best in music. This Blog however covers a lot more than SET, and is not exclusively tube-related. Cheaptubeaudio prioritizes coverage of unusual and rare gears on which little info can be found on the internet.

19 September, 2010

The Yumcha Diaries 飲茶後記: 18-09-10 (WilsonＷＡＭＭ, Continuum Caliburn)

The Yumcha Diaries 飲茶後記: 18-09-10 (Wilson, Continuum Caliburn)

Part IThe Prodigal Son, His Friend 你既老友, and a Go-BetweenOn this day JCR33 came back from a business trip and resumed his place at the table. You should have seen how the waitresses congregated around him! It was happily coincidental that we had planned a visit to his friend ML afterward, and it turned out to be a very fine time.

Sometime ago, shortly after our last visit, we got wind that the system of 盧華煇, aka ML, had undergone some major changes:

(1) The Focal Grand Utopia EMs are gone and in their place now are the Wilson WAMMs (moved from home);(2) The Continuum Caliburn turntable is back from an upgrade.

Of course, we would not miss for the world the chance to hear the legendary WAMM and to pitch the Continuum against the Clearaudio. Again, we relied on 鄔 Sir Sir to arrange things, and made our second visit after yumcha. Apology to the host that the crowd was a little larger than anticipated.

How an Ugly Duckling Turned Into a Swan.A little background on the WAMM is in order. A good place to start would be the History page in the official Wilson Audio site (just don't read the baloney about the Wiener Musikverein inspiring his newest thinking!). The next piece of mandatory reading is JA's 1990 Wilson interview in Stereophile, in which Wilson offers much insight into the WAMM.

In the pic on the right, you shall note that the Dahlquist DQ-10's, on which the WAMM prototype was initially based. The look of the DQ10's look is a dead-ringer for Quad ESL57. They were famous during their long reign and contemporaneous with the Yamaha NS-1000 (info here, here and here; even J Gordon Holt wrote a preview on a pre-production unit). It's a bit like Vandersteen, all drivers except the enclosed woofer in an open-baffle and time-aligned. Readers with good memory would remember I had a pair of these marvelous speakers and mentioned them in a previous article. On top of the DQ10 sat what looks like a large RTR ESR electrostatic tweeter and at the very top a small Braun (/ads) 2-way mini-monitor (not sure what model; earlier WAMMs used Braun's). Info on both RTR and Braun are difficult to find now. If you have more info on Braun or RTR, let me know.

What has Paul Klipsch got to do with it?Here is a pic of Wilson's home during the last days of the WAMM , from a Soundstage Factory Tour. Here we have a set of late-production WAMMs. The report took place just before the WAMM was discontinued (article mentioned 53 WAMMs in existence; according to ML, only 55 were ever produced).

This set looks very similar to ML's set (serial #49). In between the 2 2-way mini-monitors (not Braun anymore) is sandwiched an electrostatic panel made up of 9x Janszen (not to be confused with Jensen) units, the whole sort of an augmented D'Appolito Array.

The (sub) bass column has a single 15" woofer mounted rather high, and a small front-firing port. What most interested me in the pic was where Dave Wilson (I think purposefully) placed it, right against the corner, kind of like the Klipschorn (which differs in having a true bass horn that utilizes the corner by design). Many people simply do not know Dave Wilson has very high regards for Paul Klipsch and Klipschorn. I suspect most Wilson users, "modern" hi-end'ers, would instantly dismiss horns as a genre. They should read this article indeed. Another thing of note is what Wilson used himself, including an ARC preamp (he talked about ARC later in the JA interview). Wilson Audio has always used ARC tube products (and vice versa) in their own rooms (here), but for some reasons it's not so common to see HK Wilson users doing the same. Keep in mind Wilson's recordings (one example below) were made with tubes in the signal path too.

Even more interesting are the bass units, the iconic KEF radiators (aka 大球場; I'd guess active versions here). People have derided the WAMM as being LS3/5A + ESL + KEF; in actuality there is nothing LS3/5A about it, except for the presence of the small mini-monitors. If anything, the implementation is more like the pioneering KEF 104AB pictured, very fine monitors that are seriously under-rated (see here). Come to think of it, for a multi-box idea, KEF's 105 was a pioneer too. To digress further, the KEF (and TDL) radiators of course can be seen in many other iconic speakers of the era, such as the Sonus Faber Electa Amator (I own the MkII) and the Extrema, one of my dream speakers.

I note that aside from an infinite number of permutations on aligning the drivers, the equalizer was not flat at all. You can spend a life time dialing in the settings...I am sure that's not the last we have heard of the WAMM. A tweaker's delight!----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part IIIt's Lonely on TopBefore I begin to "report", I'd refer you to the picture I drew. Driving the four columns were 2 pairs of Spectral monoblock amps connected by MIT Oracle cables. Here's the current equipment list, including Hong Kong's sole sample of Continuum Caliburn (now with the latest updates):

Wilson WAMM = Focal Grand Utopia EM?In the high-end design world, Form Follows Function is almost an imperturbable dictum. But in the hifi world, where both form and function are not as well delineated, such is almost always not the case. As in live performances, the "form" of the music/sound in any particular setup is contingent upon interactive personal and room factors, and most audiophiles would not hesitate to subjugate the functions of the hard wares in his pursuit. As a result, most systems bear the sonic signature of the owner, and ML is perhaps no exception.

All this only to preface what I observed, that is in this particular room the Wilson WAMM did not sound all that different from the Focal Grande Utopia EM. Of course, as the Focal's were gone we did not do an A/B comparison and I am relying on my aural memory.

Similar as they may be, they are not quite identical. Mostly the same LPs were played to facilitate comparison. Overall, the Wilson's sounded a trifle lighter, looser, and perhaps more extended; the Focal's had more midbass gravitas.

Just 2 examples: on the Manger Test LP, Gelber's Beethoven on Track 3 was more solid on the Focal but the Wilson's had more of the leading edge as the fingers hit the keys, though some of it had me confused for a Bosendorfer for a while (it's Steinway). On Track 2 though the Focal built up the steadily eerie atmosphere quite a bit better.

We also heard some different items. I personally found We Are The World nicely rendered. While it was not quite the usual rowdy rendition, the subtle delineation of the various different voices was quite mesmerizing, if just a little light on the male vocals.

Digital replay is quite different from analogue, indeed more upright and upfront, in other words livelier. Some may well prefer one format over the other. More comments on the sound are reserved for Part III.

As everybody may have his own explanations for perceived sameness, my statement is sure to stir controversy. Before my statement is deliberately hijacked by others to suit their own ill intentions, let me expound further on my own thinking...

Q1. Should 2 loudspeakers sound alike?I believe this is not a question of "Should", but rather "Can". Yes, I believe two very different systems, not just loudspeakers in isolation, can sound similar. And keep in mind the more subjective "alike" does not equal the more objective "the same". In our hifi world, I believe the accumulation of at least over 80 years of growth and experience, wisdom and follies has greatly enriched us, particularly in the understanding of neutrality and the means to get it. By this I mean for the dedicated there are many paths, using new or old equipment, home or pro gears, to similar results.

Should the Wilsons and Focals sound alike? Who knows!But why not? If you look carefully at the designs, even shapes, you shall start to find more than coincident similarities between the two. In particular, variations on the D'Appolito Array and care paid to time alignment.

Can they sound alike? Not if I had to guess from previous impressions of Wilson and Focal speakers. But yes, judging by this audition.Now, the corollary.

Q2. What's the "real" sound of a good transducer?Aside from its duty to provide good presence to the music, I believe a good transducer should be responsive to whatever changes in the signal. Unfortunately, this also means two people (designers and audiophiles alike) can get completely different sound out of the same transducer. If this were not true, we would not have the frequent misfortune of hearing anomalies such as ear-bleeding "neutrality", airless panels, narcotizing vintage gears, lugubrious ESLs, bass-shy big JBLs, to name just a few oddities perpetuated by some audiophiles.

In the most exalted realm, it is often said the loudspeakers (and other gears) should have no real sound of their own, their only duty to get out of the way. Do the Wilsons and Focals belong to this exalted category? I believe they do.

Q3. What Factors are Conducive to Likeness?In short, a higher control, beyond equipment, akin to the supratentorial influence on reflexes. Electrical gears interact like reflexes, but they are susceptible to other controls. Here are some candidates:

The Room: No matter how much care we take in speaker placement and system implementation, we all know the room plays the biggest role in how the system will sound. Here, as discussed in the last visit, ML's unique room is even more of a factor than most, its almost stealthy silence (particularly the stage portion) more of an iron grip than any equipment can be. Incidentally, before I forget, I still think images, like last time, are just a shade elevated even at our listening volume. This could well be alignment or preference, or simply room effect. The bottom line is I think the room is a major player here, as I am sure is ML's intention.

Another reason why some people listen at low volume is a Hong Kong syndrome: the speakers are too large for the room.

Power Conditioning: The best power conditioning is supposed to remove interferences without removing music. Here I must declare a bias. Unlike ML, I'm usually quite strongly against conditioning. Personally, I'd rather have a little more roughness than too much smoothness. But not everyone is the same. My guess would be that in ML's place a little of the sort of liveliness (presence) I treasure has been deliberately removed during conditioning, butI do appreciate the silent background and refinement. There was a huge amount of tiny ambient details on offer, more than in almost any other system I have heard, though presented in an ultra-calm fashion that perhaps betrays a synthetic origin. You can listen to this system for days without fatigue, but wouldn't just a bit of fatigue be more real?

Listening Volume: I have consistently observed this is a pervasive trait among well-known older HK audiophiles (often over-solicitously referred to as "Master" this and that; 各大師，大佬，大大，大_...). Almost down to the last person they guard the volume knob zealously. Let me be frank, for my taste most of them play at unrealistically low volume. It is relatively OK to play chamber music at a low volume, but to play a big symphony at low volume just does not work for me, someone who goes to concert regularly. When we listen by ourselves, we can choose any volume we like, but when there is a gathering it is then a showcase where more realistic volume level is a requisite for demonstration of high fidelity, for what fidelity can there be if the volume is much lower than in real life? I'd venture that too low a listening level easily leads to a feeling of sameness washing over even audible differences. It's like asking which of two girls is prettier and getting an answer of "...the same."

That said, if I have to, I can adjust myself to low listening level and, well, interpolate the rest. In the case of ML, although the listening level is below my norm, it is still thankfully significantly higher than many of his cohorts. Careful listening revealed that, within his own chosen envelope of calmness, nothing serious was lacking. The sound was layered and nuanced, of exceptional refinement. Commendably too, transients were quick when the dynamics changed, and the scale of bigger canvas faithfully preserved, though somewhat scaled down. Within this low-listening-level species, I personally would rate ML a master, and downgrade some of well-known "masters" and "大_" to journeymen, if not apprentices.

Neutrality: Finally it's my firm belief that only in a highly neutral system can two highly neutral speakers achieve semblance.

Wilson: It operates above 5kHz. And it operates at a very low level. It functions primarily to provide part of the leading edge of high-frequency transients.

ML asked us to participate in a test. Some of his friends has queried whether the electrostatic panels are functional at all since one can hear almost nothing even standing directly in front of them. We listened to just one cut, Milstein's Meditation twice, with the power on and off. There is little question they did make a subtle contribution to the leading edge of the violin, exactly as Dave Wilson intended.

To me this little demonstration was the singular most interesting thing about the afternoon. A designer took great pains to add just a little information to the leading edge of the notes which he missed from the tweeters. No doubt skeptics will think of this as patching, but I think it showcased Wilson's acute hearing. Thumbs up! Now, where have I placed the telephone number of 教父高, anathematic to some but a hero to me? It'd be time to pay him a visit! I wonder how many drivers he now employs...

Pictured also above is an original Janszen unit. You may want to read the little link at Martin Logan's site, especially if you have been seriously misled into thinking Quads as the only worthy electrostatics on earth.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part IIIVinyl Talk: Clearaudio Statement vs Continuum CaliburnShootout Fantastique 擧(手)與不擧(手)Gulp...after a drink of water we have finally arrived at the real raison d'etre of this article, to compare the Continuum Caliburn and Clearaudio Statement, 2 of the most expensive turntables in the world. For such famous turntables, there are really very few reviews. Whatever there are mostly report on the technical aspects and much less so on the sonic aspects, even severely lacking in thoroughness.

Continuum Caliburn/Cobra: Stereophile ; HiFi ChoiceAirtight PC-1: Ken Kessler; TASClearaudio Statement: The reviews need further scrutiny. The TAS review is a thorough one, but IMHO failed to pick up on the Archilles' heel of the Statement (on which more later); Ken Kessler's review in HiFi News was more a site visit than a proper review and said little on the sound; Australian HiFi was downright negligent and ill-informed. Claiming one cut was enough to establish the supremacy of the Statement, the reviewer said: "...I can assure you that listening longer did not tell me anything more about the sound quality than drinking a glass of wine tells you any more about the taste than you knew after the first sip..." Wow, what a "connoiseur" who most likely has had too much Australian wine and not enough of French vintages! And this on the soil of the Continuum! :-)Clearaudio Goldfinger v2: TAS

Here I must again thank ML for playing various tracks on both TTs even without our prompting. Both cartridges were fed into the same FM222, with the same loading of 30o ohms. The specs of the 2 cartridges differ significantly:

As is frequent with expensive cartridges, there is little information on loading recommendation, not even from the manufacturers. ML believes the Goldfinger should be loaded at 300 ohms. He thinks the PC-1 should be 400 ohms. Curiously, I found at one of the vendors the "Recommended Loading" for the PC-1 is 30-100 ohms, but that may be the vendor's own opinion. But we listened to 300 ohms for both.As the Audio Note M10 preamp has a stepped volume, precise volume matching was not entirely possible, but the different temperaments of the 2 contenders were instantly revealed. Unlike the case with the loudspeakers, I believe you can easily tell them apart in a blind test and with disparate volume settings. This is important, especially in light of the discussion in Part II. It is also a testament to the neutrality of the system and to the effacing act of the speakers.

The Clearaudio setup sounded rock-solid as usual, with pitch-black background, uncanny imaging detail retrieval and seismic bass. In these departments one is in agreement with the reviews. But what of its weakness? None of the review mentioned a single weakness. I regard this as serious malpractice by the audio critics.

The Archilles' heel of the Clearaudio Statement is a (profound) lack of rhythmic savvy, or (poor) Pace, Rhythm and Timing (PRaT), should you wish. I have said this on numerous occasions, and I have heard 3 Statements so far, and they all sounded the same, so it's not an afterthought after comparison with the Continuum. I quote myself:

July-10 First Visit to ML: "...在背景寧靜和細節重播上，Clearaudio Statement 肯定是優秀的，可是我認爲這個唱盤似乎有點遺漏了音樂重生最重要之一的一環， 那就是節奏感。 這是我聼過 Statement , 甚至於 Master Reference (乃至於大部份 Clearaudio 唱盘) 後都沒能揮去的感覺。..."(addendum: many months ago at another place we actually got to listen to a newly delivered Statement. Comparison with the old Master Reference revealed the newcomer to be rhythmically inferior)

August-10 in a report on the Clearaudio Concept: "...Most importantly, it has alively rhythm and pace, something unusual for this company. In this aspect, without A/B comparison, I instantly know it is superior to my Champion, and many of this company's expensive offerings..."

September-10 listening to another Clearaudio TT (model unnamed): "...The TT has recently been upgraded. Sound is very dynamic, with black background, but I am still bothered by its lack of rhythmic elan. I remain unmoved by this Clearaudio..."

More than round earth vs flat earth, PRaT is an absolutely integral part of music replay. Without it, music becomes boring. Would you tolerate your favorite drummer, say Art Blakey, sounding four-square like the boy next door? Whatever their individual merits and demerits, this would never happen on a humble Garrad 301, Thorens TD150, Systemdek, to name just a few. For a manufacturer with tall claims to building the world's finest turntable, it is serious negligence.

How does the Continuum setup better the Clearaudio setup in this regard? The Wilson LP violin and piano (Abel/Steinberg) illustrated it for us. At the same sound level, the violin sounded more sinuous, simply more fluent. It was as if bar lines had suddenly disappeared. Even more significantly, the piano sounded louder and livelier as a result of better transients and microdynamics. The leading edge of the Continuum setup was faster and had more presence. I think part of this may be attributable to the difference in cartridges. In the TAS review of the Goldfinger cited above, JV made a similar observation. Overall, as heard in this setup, most of us voted for the Continuum.

To be fair, the Statement triumphed in almost every other department. I also think the newly upgraded Continuum setup was not yet fully optimized. Aside from obvious superiority in PRaT and better transients, it sounded a little constricted compared to the Statement. Perhaps more experiments in loading options shall bring rewards.

What I'd like to hear one day is a different arm and cartridge on the Statement. I wonder who's going to be the first one bold enough to do it? Well, if that's too much to hope for, how about a different cartridge on it? That would be fascinating. It would be boring if everyone uses the same arm and cartridge, same sound. Otherwise, I'd personally prefer to hear more of the Continuum and less of the Statement.

Red andBlueML played for us the RR LP of Berlioz, and since JCR33 was there we reminisced about the Everest version heard so unforgettably (the bell!) on his Westminster. ML managed to dig out that recording too, and we had a good time comparing the two. Myself? I prefer the Everest.

Despite some differences in opinions, all was jolly and no one got red and blue.Acknowledgement: Differences pale next to gratitude. I must give my biggest and most sincere thanks to ML for treating us to so many rarities in one day.

2 comments:

Another great write up. I'm not surprised by your finding of the Statement lacking PRaT. For a non-contact design, the interface driving the passive platter is being replaced by magnets. Magnetism is compliant. The bottom platter is belt-drive which is a compliant system and then that platter is driving the top platter via magnetism. There's bound to be delay and smearing in transferring torque into the top platter. Think of a belt drive turntable driving another turntable via another belt: compliance on top of compliance! Of course it lacks rhythm! Another problem with this type of design is the bearing. The top shaft must protrude down the bearing well to hold the top magnetic platter, therefore it has to dispense the simplicity of single point bearing, the stick in a hole type. It has to use a type of angular contact bearing, a la EAR Diskmaster, which creates MORE contact and pressure points than a simple single ball bearing. I much prefer the Transrotor's TMD design. And if you have to use magnets, they don't have to be placed one above the other, they can be placed side by side to lessen the compliance and achieve tighter coupling. But for marketing purpose, it's easier to demo to potential buyers the non contact feature. To be honest, one is better off with a direct drive turntable for simplicity sake since it's magnetic drive, without accounting of course for DD's difficulty of smooth rotation in slow speed, ie, cogging. The Rube Goldberg approach of Statement is really not my cup of tea.

Tips on Using this Blog

Many readers come to this blog to read about a specific component, usually after a Google search that provides a single link. But the item/topic may also have been treated in several entries not listed by Google. In order to access them, please understand how this Blog works.

How this Blog Works I write as I go along and as my systems evolve. Although I mostly "review" my own equipment, my views are not set in stone, once written. That is because, unlike a reviewer, I don't have deadlines and I do not have to return equipment. Also, system changes and long term use can shed new lights on equipment, and this is important to record. This is another reason why I frequently write Follow Up's, usually termed, Part II, III, etc. These follow up's usually would have a link to Part I, but the reverse is not necessarily true, as I forget to update old articles sometimes. Therefore to find everything I have written on a subject, please do the following:

Labels Navigate the right column to the huge Labels section. Look for the subject(s) you are interested in. The Brand- designation is particularly useful. e.g., if you want to look up Wavac, just click Brand-Wavac.

Search This Blog On the Upper Left Corner, or A little below this you will see this function. Just type in what you want. The result is more exhaustive; even if something, say Wavac, is mentioned just in passing it very well may show up in seemingly unrelated articles. Although I try to religiously and accurately label my articles, sometimes things slip through the radar and can only be found this way.

Enjoy! I hope my articles have been helpful.

Updates and Revisions

See Coming Attractions section below for more listing.

Search This Blog

Translate

Youtube of Music I like

CD Box Set(s) I am Playing

I am not listening to the entire box (available at the library) but to the early recordings released on Heliodor, Westminster etc, featuring his Soviet era partners. I particularly like the Schubert Quintet in C (Taneyev Quartet)

CD

A stunning performance of Prokofiev's Quintet, and more, in topnotch sound.

SACD I am playing

SACD

SACD

It is fashionable these days to pair Bach with Ysaye. More often than not, it doesn't work, but this version for me goes to the very top of such attempts. Sumptuous sound, as usual.

Historical Recording (CD) I am Playing

This sensitive and elegant artist is inexplicably neglected. The archived material covers a long span of several decades, proving that her technique had remained infallible for far longer than her peers (like de Vito, Morini etc). Perhaps only Ida Haendel can rival her.

Gadget

You can also use the LABELS to find what you want. Scroll down to near bottom and you'll see Labels alphabetically arranged. The most useful ones would be Brand and Overview.

For Questions and Comments

For CommentsComments are welcome any time. After moderation, they shall be published.

For QuestionsAs a rule, don't forget to tell me what you use, and what do you think of the sound, and reservations if any!

A. Questions related to an article/review

(1) Click on Comment (under each article) and post your comment or question; (2) After moderation, the comment/question is published and answered under the article. Hopefully, my response shall be prompt, but give it a few days. (3) Don't forget to tell me what you use, and what do you think of the sound, and reservations if any! My answers may not mean much if I don't know what you're using and how you feel.

B. Questions NOT related to an article/review If your question has nothing to do with any of the articles, just pick any article, no matter how irrelevant, and post your question. I will get it anyway, but I won't post it as a comment. Instead, if I can answer the question, I'll post both the question and answer in the Reply Section below, in Letters to the Editor-Reply. Again, don't forget to tell me what you use, and what do you think of the sound, and reservations if any! But not all questions get this treatment. Some are just too general to be answered.

C. Email (if necessary)If your suggestion or comment is more of a private nature, you can email me at:

doctorjohn@myself.com

Unless the subject is very close to my heart, I tend to be quite tardy in replying to individuals, and replying by email can be cumbersome. So, only if absolutely necessary.

Letters to the Editor - Reply

Q. Anonymous, Jan 3, 2017

Do you have any experience with the DIY Audio Note kit amps?

A. Doctorjohn, Aug 28, 2017

The old Kit One is a good amp, with parts from AN UK. But the current so-called Audio Note Kit is not really associated with AN UK. An industry person tells me the boss behind is someone from Hong Kong. No wonder in HK there are stealth kit operations. I'd not consider them now.

Counter 点击次数 (Starting from 由 - 8888 on 18/01/09 开始）

Unique Visitors 访客人数 ( Starting from 由 - 3333 on 22/01/09 开始）

If you click Flagcounter you would notice an anomaly: very very few hits from China (accounting for <0.1%) . Blogspot, one of the world's largest, is not accessible in China, which is highly unfortunate even if I write mostly in English.

HiFi CD/LP 天碟一只

This very early Reference Recording LP commands a good price. The CD was not issued by RR, but rko, and I think has been discontinued. The music is strange , best known in HK for 大鼓跌落地.

NY 常用器材 Equipment I most often use in NY now

There are now 4 main Stations in my listening room. They undergo frequent changes (in particular the analog playback setups). I use long interconnects between the preamps and amps to facilitate ease in matching(Last revised Oct 25, 2017)

Reference System I (Station I)

This one is in front of my chair. I can reach and touch the controls of the preamp.

Turntable:-Thorens TD-124/SME 3012/Denon DL-103

-ClearaudioConcept/Ortofon Kontrapunkt C

-Technics SL-1200Mk2/Denon DL-102 (mono)

Phonoamps

-Aurorasound Vida (separate MM and MC inputs) for the Linn and Technics

-Fosgate Signature (v1) for the Clearaudio

Digital front-end:

-Theta Data Universal Transport

-Sonic Frontier SFD-2 DAC

Preamp

-Manley Neo-Classic 300B (default)-Western Electric106 (original)(only used when using the WE124 amps; see below)

Main Amplifier:-Wavac MD-811

Alternate Amplifiers:-Sunfire 300 and other amplifiers are used depending on speakers used.-WE 124 (this amplifier is only exclusively used in this system in partnership with the WE106 preamp, an invincible match)

Reference System II:This station is at the other end, housed on 2 racks, and drives the same amplifier. It is quite different in sound from System I. This station can be fully balanced (but not usually).Turntables:1-Linn LP-12 Lingo/Ittok LV-II/Airtight PC-1

幾句話 About this Blog

I have been participating on the internet in various hifi sites for almost 20 years. Looking at things now makes one really weary of the word "progress".

In many ways I miss the earlier USENET newsgroups the most. Posting is super fast and the lack of picture hosting is a real blessing in many ways. Things were simpler then.

Then I created my own Yahoo Group (see link), but I really find the format cumbersome, and now only maintain the site for archival purposes. Who knows, one day I may re-vamp the thing, but too little time....

A few years ago, before the establishment of this blog, I had been active in review33, a site that still a useful second-hand forum (link below). Unfortunately, HK is small and people actually get to meet, which is NOT an advantage for an internet forum. The traffic evolved into 同仁活動, Chinese for insiders' game. There were few honest opinions, and feuds and flames developed over the littlest things. Then there were splinter groups, IMITATORS that are of even more of a 同仁活動 insider nature. That diluted everything and what got lost is HiFi. It would be fair to say most of the forums in HK now contain more junk than value.

Since then I have concentrated on my Blog. It is nice to be able to archive everything well and not let things get covered by waves of garbage. Writing articles take lot more than than posting in forums. Many have long periods of gestation and repeated revisions and editing. I hope you enjoy them.

Briefly, who am I 简介

Music is my passion. I am foremost a classical music person. I started in the mid-seventies, with LP of course. I did not get a CD player until the late 80's. Now I have a huge collection of both! Nothing however beats going to a live concert!....
I love classic jazz and classic rock too...I am obsessed with hifi, as it is worthwhile to seek truthful reproduction of sound, not as simple as it seems....
I love the other art forms too, but there is too little time left after music and hifi....
One of my biggest regrets is that I don't play an instrument.
音乐第一， 音响第二。