Not
since the days of Noah has there been such a systematic destruction of
the children, not just literally (through infanticide), but through brainwashing
and abuse. There’s a lot at stake for the liberal elites and turncoat
conservatives, but their plans didn’t come out of thin air. The real source
is spiritual, and a “war in the heavenlies” is mirroring what’s happening
here on earth—a war that’s more insidious than those fought with guns,
grenades, and rockets.

While
researching the weapons of the New World Order crowd, I stumbled upon
the work of Lynette Burrows, author of the book, The Fight for the
Family - the adults behind children's rights. Her book contains
the names of liberal activist groups that “have been campaigning since
the 1970s to promote children’s rights and remove from parents the right
to discipline their children and pass on their values.” It’s no surprise
that the UN is the giant umbrella under which all such small groups gather.

Mrs.
Burrows, the mother of six children, knows what’s going on in the UK and
elsewhere. This includes the left’s campaign to abolish corporal punishment
in the schools, the passage of legislation “to forbid the use of any form
of physical discipline in any setting, including the family,” and “lowering
the age of consent for hetero- and homo-sexual activity.” It’s enough
to break the hearts of those who value the traditional family.

What’s
pathetic is their use of pseudo-lingo, “psychobabble,” and the UN Declaration
on the Rights of the Child to bolster their campaigns. This is not children’s
rights; it’s the Sodom-and- Gomorrah-izing of the children which will
lead to the final demise of the family, whether extended or nuclear. For
this they use such illustrious publications as the “Labour Gay Rights
Manifesto.” (Notice that only evil seems to come from some form of “manifesto”—the
Humanist Manifestos 1-4, the Communist Manifesto, and Mein Kampf which
is still a manifesto.) Here’s a sample of what they believe (as cited
in “Educating for the AntiChrist”):

“Children grow
up under the power of their parents. As children, any behaviour which
is obviously sexual in adult terms is repressed. A socialist society
would supersede the family household. Gay people and children should
have the right to live together. Children and young people should have
the right to determine their own sexual lives. Marriage should be disestablished.
Women need access to free contraception and abortion facilities; this
applies just as much to young women as to 'adults.' Children should
be able to divorce their parents. It follows from what we have already
said that we favour the abolition of the age of consent.”

This
is the goal of just one group that’s out to control the sexuality of OUR
children. But we keep hearing that we have nothing to fear from homosexuals.
Sorry, but I find the agenda of the Labour Gay Rights Manifesto downright
frightening and offensive. Color me outraged, and righteously “homophobic,”
homo-disgusted, and homo-nauseated.

On October
28, 2000, Burrows gave a lecture at the “Mankind” Conference and discussed
the ideas presented in G.K. Chesterton’s The Flying Inn, written almost
a century ago (1914). She had a reason for using that work of near-prophetic
fiction. The story takes place right before the end of Britain’s imperialistic
reign. The Brits were “stripped of almost every sign of their traditions
and their national identity, [while everything] Eastern was praised and
accommodated, and everything the British believed [was] trashed.”

Was
it really fiction? Not if you watch the nightly news and realize that
Great Britain has been infiltrated and nearly taken over by those she
once ruled. In fact, Burrows explained that the hero of The Flying Inn,
Dalroy, believed that the governing class saw the destiny of Empire in
four Acts:

Perhaps,
what’s happening on our borders requires more scrutiny. But here’s more.
In The Flying Inn, polygamy had to be accommodated, divorce was
made easy, and sexual morality was “declared completely irrelevant so
citizens would be lost in a welter of ‘new ways of living.’” The British
army no longer existed and was replaced with a foreign army.

Sound
familiar yet? Try this: Chesterton’s The Flying Inn had a subplot
of uniting a western democracy with an Islamic regime. Does that make
some bells ring? Is the same thing happening in Europe and here . . .
almost one hundred years later? Is the infiltration of illegal aliens
from the South part of a larger, more dangerous takeover? The answers
are: it should, yes, and yes. Remember Daniel’s vision of the four world
empires. The last was the feet of iron and clay—as in uniting a western
democracy with an Islamic regime, or a revived Roman Empire with the desired
strength of the Babylonian Empire. No digression here . . .

Burrows
also noted Chesterton’s views on women securing the right to vote. “The
[voting'] franchise was always widened when the governing class were up
to no good and were in trouble. It was because they knew it gave people
no power that they gave them [the women] the power to vote.” Now you know
why 18-year-olds got the vote in the 1970s. The liberals were in trouble.

Burrows
also spoke on the feminist movement, acknowledging it as sham. “The truth,
however, is that men and women with power have always oppressed men and
women without power,” she said. Read that statement this way: “Women with
power have always oppressed women without power.” The leaders of the feminist
movement have been some of the most oppressive women in the workplace,
government schools, and colleges. If we don’t agree with their positions,
they have plenty of choice words for and about us. Their hatred of God
and Judeo-Christianity stands in stark contrast to their demands for tolerance;
or is that peace, flowers, and freedom?

In its
alleged quest for equality for women, the feminist movement fomented the
destruction of the family (especially poor families) and the creation
of a global harem via the destruction of morals. Women still (as in ancient
empires) rely on their physical selves to bargain for the crown jewels.
Look at the prostitution rings taking shape on college campuses across
this nation. Modern women have evidently found a way to put a dollar value
on their virtue; and once that virtue is sold, the merchandise is no different
than a used car.

This
is the type of education being nurtured in the youngest of our females
for the good of the New World Order. The harems must be replenished and
our littlest girls are the source. This is not freedom for women, it’s
slavery; and it comes with a high price—the destruction of their souls.

Go back,
again, to Chesterton’s time. He believed that women’s instincts were naturally
“despotic,” something which could be seen in the way they ran their homes,
their role in their children’s education, and the way they met the needs
of their husbands and children. Burrows put it this way: “They had been
the rock and guide of what was arguably the most important, and certainly
the oldest institution on earth and they had protected its autonomy and
their right to rule it by instinct, common sense, and strength of character.”

Ironically,
Emma Goldman (often called “Red Emma”) gave a speech in San Francisco
during the suffragette movement. A contemporary of Chesterton, she said
that if men were oppressing women, women were to blame because of the
way they raised their sons. Her speech didn’t go over well, but her words
still apply today. Sons are no longer raised by their mothers to be men,
but some sissified hybrid that God didn’t create or intend. Their individuality
and ruggedness has been drummed or drugged out of them by the socialists
in Washington, DC.

Recall
that women also had control over socially acceptable behavior. As Burrows
stated, women didn’t need “the blundering interference of ‘sexual harassment’
laws to ensure that men treated them with positively exaggerated deference,
nor took liberties with them in public.” Today, women need laws to protect
them from the very dangers they created for themselves in their quest
for freedom and equality.

Prior
to WWI, wealthy or near-rich women employed thousands of servants and
ruled them as oppressively as they believed themselves to be oppressed.
It was this form of “tyranny” that spawned Chesterton’s concern regarding
women in the world of politics. He noted two dangerous effects that would
likely “forever harm even the strongest culture,” and he was right. As
Burrows stated:

1. “They would
treat everybody as if they were children — and create a ‘nanny state’.
They would turn society itself into a great nursery;’” and

2. “Essentially
tyrannical laws would be enacted to uphold this re-creation of ‘mother
knows best!’ ” Ironically, this would produce laws “that oppress
parental authority. Parents no longer have the right to discipline children
as they think fit, nor to require other people such as teachers and
policemen, to give them the discipline they need to reach adult life
without a criminal record.”

So,
these “nanny state” women (usually found in liberal or left-wing political
circles) have now put the moral education of our children more and more
into the hands of government so that (as Burrows said) “children can be
introduced to gross sexual provocation in the classroom and then supplied
with the means to be promiscuous without their parents even being told.”
However, in the name of freedom and power, illegitimacy has increased,
abortions still take place (the great American Holocaust is operating
without government interference while tax dollars and political donations
from the abortion industry fill their coffers), and sexually transmitted
diseases are plagues on this nation.

Face
it! Liberalism is a sinister form of bullyism that makes living under
the rules of the most legalistic Christianity a walk in the park. Liberals
are the new totalitarians who want to control our beliefs, our thoughts,
our prayer lives, and our Christian worship. They want to shove their
ungodly sewage down our throats, and punish us severely if we speak out
against them, their “manifestos,” and the social practices they want to
impose on us. They consider us “mentally ill” while they wallow in spiritual
sickness. No digression here . . .

Burrows
also noted that the men who claim to be “pro-women” are the very men who
use women to do “the ‘dirty jobs’ in making public policy.” She referred
to the current work of the notable Lady Gavron, a contemptible elitist,
who wants to get rid of all traditional British culture and “turn us into
a ‘community of communities’ rather than a nation.” Her plan, if
successful, lets the men off the hook because a woman becomes responsible
for the master attack on national sovereignty. (I’ll bet Lady Gavron is
good friends with Hillary Clinton.) Eventually, liberal/elitist women
will become the force that makes governments more “tyrannical” with little
or no liberty for anyone but them.

The
new governments that rule today don’t operate on anything resembling “traditional
right and wrong” because it’s been “dispensed with by the new [im]morality
of liberalism.” As Burrows stated, “We have a unique and shameless collection
of perverts, ratters on their marriage vows, and takers of money from
the highest bidder—and the media turns a blind eye because they are too
afraid to break ranks.”

Well,
I don’t think the media is frightened in the least by world rulers. I
think they work in concert with them. They’re akin to voyeurs watching
the plan they support unfold before their eyes; and they report the “news”
as instructed by the powers of “this present darkness.” They have forsaken
the truth for something far more diabolical—at least until someone breaks
into their homes, rapes their daughters, or steals their money.

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:

Indeed,
Satan is alive and well on planet earth . . . and his followers demonstrate
their allegiance to him through their own immoral and heinous deeds. To
this end, Burrows suggested we all “learn to be more brave and [speak
out about] what we believe without fear of condemnation.” I stand shoulder
to shoulder with her and share her belief that we cannot “allow ourselves
to be silence by the pipsqueaks of power.” Citing Chesterton, Burrows
concluded her speech with the following: “When a people have lost their
courage, they cannot rely on keeping any other virtue.”

Part
4 of this piece is in progress and will continue where Part 3 left off.

Jill Cohen Walker earned a BA from
Goddard College in 1977, a JD from Franklin Pierce Law Center in 1980,
and an MS in journalism at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville in 1999.
A freelance writer for fifteen years, she has written numerous articles
for tech magazines and newspapers, and co-authored a book on hiring practices
in the printing industry.

She taught Social Studies for one
year in a northern middle school, and medical-legal and bio-medical courses
in the Allied Health division of a local community college for four years.
A student of legal history and the US Constitution, she began to study
current events and Bible prophecies in March 1985. Her deep interest in
and awareness of American politics started during the 2000 elections when
she realized the prophetic time clock was ticking fast. She is the co-author
of the novel "The Call to Prayer". (www.thecalltoprayer.net).