Join 300,000+ other PPC Geekers for free at the #1 online community for CDMA PPC Devices! Talk about the newest phones or post your question in our forums! Work your way up to VIP status and get extra perks!

We encourage all of our visitors to register and to become a part of this great community with over 70,000 threads and a million posts. As a member you'll also see less advertisements. So what are you waiting for? Register for free today!

well what do you expect? im sure at&t had some pressure from crapple to sue. the ad brings up a great point though, at&ts 3g sucks balls. i work on coranado island (a few hundred yards from san diego downtown) and all the iphone users get stuck with edge.

lol, this reminds of when apple decided they wanted to sue over the "laptop hunters" ads. It's funny because all the Mac ads I've seen never say anything about features or hardware or anything. It basically says "buy a mac, its better". Very hypocritical in my opinion.

it stews down to this: according to at&t they have 3g coverage everywhere. we all know its a load of bull but they can make that claim because 3g is a very ill defined term (some digital communications officianados still consider evdo and hspa to be 2.5 or 2.75g and not true 3g). Because 3g is so horribly defined at&t feels they can brand their edge connection 3g and get away with it. making the verizon commercials false advertisement.

i see one good thing that COULD come from this law suit: some actual criteria for the diffferent cellular commucations.