Amazon is one of the few companies that went through multiple transformations in the last decade. Whether it was offering a commission-based brokerage service or creating an e-book reader that revolutionised the publishing industry, it has always disrupted the market.

Download this free guide

Hybrid Cloud workloads: The Essential Guide

Access this guide to help you tackle the key hybrid cloud architecture issue: workload management.

But a closer look at Amazon’s business strategy is reminiscent of Microsoft in the mid-1990s. The business models may be different and the market dynamics have changed, but here are five signs that prove Amazon is the new Microsoft:

1. Cloud monopoly

If Microsoft was perceived as a threat in the software sphere due to its monopolistic approach, AWS is undoubtedly a monopoly in the cloud market. While Microsoft used tactics such as bundling IE with Windows, AWS focuses on undercutting the competition with colossal price drops and a broad service portfolio.

While customers may appreciate this, the industry is threatened by its dominance. Recently, Rackspace president Taylor Rhodes admitted that AWS disrupted their business. The cloud price war forced Rackspace to re-invent itself as a managed cloud provider. If that’s what AWS can do to a publicly listed cloud company that existed before Amazon entered the market, imagine its impact on traditional datacentre, co-location and hosting providers.

2. Windows vs. Linux all over again

Back in the 1990s, the industry realised that Linux and open-source software are the only weapons to effectively combat Microsoft. Everyone from IBM to Oracle rallied around Linux to counter the growing threat of Microsoft Windows in enterprises. Initiatives like OpenOffice and StarOffice attempted to challenge Microsoft Office.

OpenStack is facing exactly the same challenges that Linux went through in the 1990s. Linux suffered from complexity in its early days, with limited available talent in the market. It took more than a decade for distributions such as Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Ubuntu and SUSE to become enterprise-ready. Though OpenStack is rapidly evolving, it is still not ready for prime-time.

3. Love-hate relationship with partners

Microsoft is known for creating a thriving ecosystem primarily driven by developers and ISVs (independent software vendors). Each time Microsoft updated Office, it added a set of new features that affected the partners who built and sold tools that had similar functionality. After reaching a specific threshold with the feature set of Office suite, Microsoft had no choice but to start bundling features that competed with partner offerings. When Microsoft announced its consulting services, system integrators and professional services businesses were intimidated.

Amazon is treading the same path with its AWS business.

AWS has the unique advantage of tracking the utilisation patterns and customer workloads running on its platform. Since AWS has a 360o vantage viewpoint to customer scenarios and top-use cases, it maximises its investments in those areas. But the problem comes when the new products and services put its partners out of business.

Last month, AWS launched file-sharing and collaboration tools (Zocalo), and mobile management capabilities (Cognito) to compete with providers such as Dropbox or Parse and Kinvey, that are powered by AWS.

AWS entered the professional services business taking away the business from partners and system integrators. A quick look at the careers website of AWS points to many job listings of consultants from its professional services business.

4. Everything to everyone

Until the end of 1990s, Microsoft was a consumer company. It enjoyed the success of Windows 98 and Office 98. In the mid-2000s, it decided to go after the enterprise business dominated by IBM, SUN, Oracle and SAP. It beefed up its server offerings and in a few years Microsoft had respectable market share in the enterprise. Microsoft’s Active Directory, SQL Server, SharePoint, Exchange, BizTalk and System Center have a sizable footprint in customers' datacentres.

With the success of Apple iPod, iPhone and iPad, Microsoft suddenly woke up to the fact that it had lost the consumer market. The debacle of Zune, Windows Phone 7 and Windows 8 put Microsoft in a precarious position. Its Xbox business is not growing, with analysts recommending dropping the product line from its core business.

Amazon is no different. It’s an e-commerce company, eBook reader OEM, cloud services platform, media services company and now even a devices company. While its story is much better than that of Microsoft’s, Amazon has an ambitious plan to be the segment leader in each of these domains.

AWS service portfolio closely resembles Microsoft product portfolio. Windows Vista had more than eight flavours, while AWS has over 35 web services, making it complex and overwhelming for customers. Amazon EC2 alone has over 35 instance types to choose from, with no guidance on what will suit which type of enterprise. Its marketplace is fragmented, with overlapping offerings from partners, and its pricing model is complicated.

Like Microsoft in the 1990s, Amazon is more interested in launching new services than simplifying the existing portfolio.

5. Aggressive engineering and marketing efforts

Both Microsoft and Amazon have some of the best brains working for them, on cutting-edge technologies. When it comes to marketing, Amazon was lagging behind but it seems to learn from Microsoft.

Microsoft is known for its mega-marketing machine that could position even inferior products like Zune as the coolest innovations. Conferences such as Build, TechEd and WPC are the flagship events where it showcased new products and innovations. And its training and certification programmes MCSE and MCSD achieved cult status among geeks during the 1990s.

1 comment

Register

Login

Forgot your password?

Your password has been sent to:

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

I'm not sure about that. For a while Microsoft was producing a lot of things themselves: Operating Systems, Databases, games, Office Software, Compilers, Select hardware. Yes, they have some problems with monopolistic practices, vendor lock in maybe, but AMazon aside from its retail business, its It side isn't really B2C its more B2B. I feel like its a stretch to compare the two.