In the previous two posts (first, second) we have looked at the climate alarmist’s “steel greenhouse” which they mathematically solve in such a way as to lead to what they think is an alarming behaviour about temperature, which they call … Continue reading →

In the last post we examined the equations conserving energy, defining heat flow, and thermodynamic equilibrium for a power-generating sphere enclosed by a shell. We examined the equations for when the system either existed in an ambient-temperature environment above 0K, … Continue reading →

The “steel greenhouse” concept for demonstrating the radiative greenhouse effect has been debunked many times on this blog (the least reason of which its advocates attempt to conserve temperature instead of energy!), but the solution for it sitting in an … Continue reading →

The following is from an email exchange which will remain anonymous. But rationalists will find it quite interesting, hilarious, and extremely saddening… “Dear Joseph, I sent the link to your Youtube presentation titled “There is no radiative Greenhouse Effect” to … Continue reading →

Who gets the honour of being identified as the world’s most braindead!? It’s not the outright Flat Earther’s, no, not at all! Rather, it is the people who pretend to stand for modern science and who believe that they have … Continue reading →

The problem with most skeptics is that they’re not good enough skeptics. They’ve done a good job and they’ve been a million times more rational than the alarmists – really no comparison here at all in rationality and intelligence level … Continue reading →