Human Rights Alert (NGO) is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system.

.

"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases."Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Highlighting the bankruptcy of the US justice systemAnonymous recommends flying the flag upside down, a traditional signal of distress...The recent pronouncements by former President Jimmy Carter, hightlight the collapse of the US constitutional system:

It takes Carter, the engineer, to tell Obama, the constitutional scholar, that the latter has sealed the decent of the United States to medieval justice standards, and

Carter, the former top Constitutional Officer of the United States, did not refer in his statement to the obvious violations of the US Constitution by Obama, but instead, to violations of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, indicating that the US Constitution and US justice system are no longer relevant in Carter's eyes.

_________

Jimmy Carter Accuses U.S. of 'Widespread Abuse of Human Rights'

By Amy Bingham | ABC News – Mon, Jun 25, 2012

Jimmy Carter Accuses U.S. of 'Widespread abuse of human rights"

A former U.S. president is accusing the current president of sanctioning the "widespread abuse of human rights" by authorizing drone strikes to kill suspected terrorists.

Jimmy Carter, America's 39 th president, denounced the Obama administration for "clearly violating" 10 of the 30 articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, writing in a New York Times op-ed on Monday that the "United States is abandoning its role as the global champion of human rights."

"Instead of making the world safer, America's violation of international human rights abets our enemies and alienates our friends," Carter wrote.

______Anonymous recommends flying the flag upside down, a traditional signal of distress...Boycott the US presidential vote! It only legitimizes the illegitimate... 12-04-15 2012 Presidential election votes will be counted in Spainhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/89464081/Occupy! 11-12-10 Where should Occupy go next? Civil Disobedience in the footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!http :// www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/12-06-08 Courts and Judges as racketeering enterprises under RICO (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - key element in the current financial crisishttp://www.scribd.com/doc/96504009/Secede! The US in its current form is simply unmanageable...12-01-01 Secession - A Smart Business Move!http://www.scribd.com/doc/76877453/Get Up, stand up, stand up for your rights!

Imprisoned for 30 days with no due process for silently observing the court...Anonymous recommends flying the flag upside down, a traditional signal of distress...How many cases like the one below, of obvious ridicule of the rule of law by judges, do we need to realize that the system is irreparably broken?

Cases like this do NOT happen in "civil" nations. Surely they do not pass unchallenged and patronized by the higher courts, as is the standard in the United States today.LINKS:[1] 11-04-23 Habeas Corpus in the United States - the case of Richard Isaac Finehttp://www.scribd.com/doc/24729084/[2] 12-03-11 PRESS RELEASE: Ex Parte Receivership over the Person and Property of Defendant Jeffrey Baron racketeering in the US District Court in Texas is patronized by the US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuithttp://www.scribd.com/doc/84950169/

Wayne and Midland Counties Michigan – June 27, 2012 - After four petitions (Writs of Habeas Corpus) to gain his release, David Schied remains locked up in the Midland County jail. On June 8th the Novi Michigan man was committed by Judge Karen Khalil of the Redford Township 17th District Court to spend up to 30 days in jail on a charge of “contempt of court” for sitting quietly observing a court proceeding of which he was not a party. There have been 4 separate requests for the “Record of Action”, a transcript and an audio/video record of the hearing at which David was abducted. All requests have been denied.Question: Can someone be legally convicted of “contempt of court” and sentenced to 30 days in jail without a hearing or case number, without a transcript, without due process, without an audio/video, or any proof whatsoever of having committed “any act which is calculated to embarrass,hinder or obstruct court in administration of justice or is calculated to lessen its authority or its dignity”?Is an observer of a proceeding, a party to the proceeding and would such an observer be considered as “under the court’s authority”? On June 16, David handed a guard (sheriff deputy) an “Inmate Request Form” in which he crossed out “Inmate” and wrote “Captive” and asked 5 questions to which the answers were totally inane:Why am I being held in jail? Ans: You are sentenced to 30 days No BondWhat is the criminal charge? Ans: Contempt of CourtWhat act did I allegedly commit? Ans: Contempt – Write the prosecutor for report & detailsWho is the harmed party? Ans: Clinton County courtWho is my accuser? Ans: Clinton County courtWhat makes these answers so despicable is that besides there being no evidence of “Contempt” as defined by the law dictionaries or otherwise, David has never set foot in Clinton County court.With access to only paper and pencil, David was able to draft his own Writ of Habeas Corpus and submit it to a guard, who is supposed to see that it gets to the proper authorities. The guard later returned it to David and told him that it was refused with no explanation, whereupon David filed a formal complaint against the prison administration, which was answered with more time in isolation (the hole) and a threat of extended jail time.David has several law suits filed against various administrative and judicial actors who have committed various crimes against litigants and the courts, several of which name the judge who ordered his apparent kidnapping. He had two deadlines to file court papers and an appearance hearing scheduled for the time period of his incarceration. An attorney who has been helping David with his legal endeavors filed a request for an extension of the deadline for his appearance hearing and it was denied.

A fifth petition for a Writ was filed yesterday with the Federal District Court, Eastern Division of Michigan and a hearing is scheduled for tomorrow, June 28th. In none of the previous hearings was David brought to the court to make his case of unlawful detention as is required by law. Will tomorrow’s court hearing obey the law?Those working to free David believe that due to David’s history as a crime victims’ rightsadvocate, exposing judicial corruption and naming Judge Khalil and Redford Township officials as defendants in several law suits, as well filing with the Judicial Tenure Commission, that the evidence is overwhelming thatthis judge is using her judicial powers to retaliate against him. Mr. Schied has earned a high degree of respectand achieved many praiseworthy accomplishments to which his bio. will attest.http://davidschiedsaga.blogspot.com/

________Boycott the US presidential vote! It only legitimizes the illegitimate... 12-04-15 2012 Presidential election votes will be counted in Spainhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/89464081/Occupy! 11-12-10 Where should Occupy go next? Civil Disobedience in the footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!http :// www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/12-06-08 Courts and Judges as racketeering enterprises under RICO (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - key element in the current financial crisishttp://www.scribd.com/doc/96504009/Secede! The US in its current form is simply unmanageable...12-01-01 Secession - A Smart Business Move!http://www.scribd.com/doc/76877453/Get Up, stand up, stand up for your rights!

Boycott the US presidential vote! It only legitimizes the illegitimate... 12-04-15 2012 Presidential election votes will be counted in Spainhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/89464081/Occupy! 11-12-10 Where should Occupy go next? Civil Disobedience in the footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!http://www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/12-06-08 Courts and Judges as racketeering enterprises under RICO (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - key element in the current financial crisishttp://www.scribd.com/doc/96504009/Secede! The US in its current form is simply unmanageable...12-01-01 Secession - A Smart Business Move!http://www.scribd.com/doc/76877453/Get Up, stand up, stand up for your rights! _______

Friday, May 4, 2012

The time has come to reassess to impact of former Presiding Justices Aharon Barak and Dorit Beinisch on Human Rights, the justice system, and the rule of law in the State of Israel.Supreme Court of the State of Israel, Presiding Justices Aharon Barak (1995-2006) and Dorit Beinisch (2006-2012)Jerusalem, May 5 - the State of Israel has not established a constitution to this date. In the early 1990s, two “Basic Laws” were enacted by the Knesset, [1] in effort to establish fundamental Human Rights by law. Moreover, under the tenure of Presiding Justice Aharon Barak (1995-2006), and to a lesser degree under the tenure of Presiding Justice Dorit Beinisch (2006-2012) the Supreme Court purportedly led a “Constitutional Revolution” in the State of Israel. [2]Various additional "Constitutional Rights" were purportedly construed by the Supreme Court. (See for example – Israeli Civil Rights Association v Minister of Justice [3])On the other hand, the 2012 Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in Israel by the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations documents precipitous corruption of the courts of the State of Israel. The report specifically documents corruption of the Supreme Court, during the very same years that the Supreme Court’s rhetoric regarding “Constitutional Revolution” and "Constitutional Rights" reached its zenith. [4]

By February 2007, Boaz Okon was no longer Registrar of the Supreme Court, and Shmaryahu Cohen was dead for about five years. Numerous other records of the same nature were discovered.

Excerpt from one of the three records, provided by Chief Clerk SARAH LIFSCHITZ, Supreme Court of the State of Israel. The excerpt says: "Issued today, September 21, 2011", then shows spaces for the signatures of three justices. The footnote says, "copy subject to editing and phrasing changes", then shows the Seal of the Court, and the invalid, false certification stamp, "Copying Corresponds to the Original," with the hand signature of the Chief Clerk and the date of March 29, 2012. Both the Administration of Courts and Sarah Lifschitz refuse to produce the appointment record of Sarah Lifschitz as Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court, and the Administration of Courts refuses to disclose, who holds the ultimate administrative authority over the electronic records of the Supreme Court. No visible electronic signatures, pursuant to the Electronic Signature Act (2001) were implemented in the electronic records of the Supreme Court. Criminal fraud complaint was filed with the Israel Police relative to her conduct in issuing the false and deliberately misleading certifications, such as the one above.

Critical events, relative to corruption of the electronic records of the Supreme Court took place under the tenure of Barak and continued under the tenure of Beinisch.

The Human Rights Alert submission is narrowly focused on Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the Supreme Court, District Courts, and Detainees’ Courts of the State of Israel.

The submission alleges that conditions, now prevailing in the electronic record systems of the national courts of the State of Israel, are in violations of any article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, where integrity of the courts and the justice system is a prerequisite, as is the rule of law. Conditions, which have been established over the past decade, should be deemed a simulated justice system, reflecting corruption of the courts, the Ministry of Justice, and the legal profession.

The underlying research was inspired by data mining and zero knowledge proofs. Serious deficiencies were identified in all systems, which were inspected. Three senior Israeli computing/cryptology experts expressed their concern and alarm. In the Supreme Court, on or about March 7, 2002, with the untimely death of Supreme Court Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen, integrity of the electronic records was seriously compromised. IBM and EDS, two large, US-based corporations were involved. Around that date, increased irregularity is seen in certification authorities and numerous falsified decision records were discovered. Today, all electronic records are published with no certification at all, “subject to editing and phrasing changes”.

As part of the preparation of instant report, current Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court Sarah Lifschitz provided false and deliberately misleading certifications of decisions of the Supreme Court.

At the time of signing the submission, a crisis is ongoing, resulting from refusal of the government to obey a purportedly “final” decision of the Supreme Court, pertaining to demolition of a settlement, unlawfully constructed on Palestinian land.

The findings of the submission hold serious implications relative to socioeconomic trends, banking regulation, and the Israel-Palestinian conflict:1. The validity of any legal public records, originating in the State of Israel, and employed in the UPR process, should be re-assessed;2. Nations, including but not limited to those, who are parties to the Hague Apostille Convention (1961), should re-assess any faith and credit, given to legal public records originating in the courts of the State of Israel;3. Attempts to address the crisis would likely be compounded by conflicts of rivaling security, legal, and financial groups.

The Human Rights Alert submission recommends that major efforts be made to address what amounts to a constitutional crisis in a nation with no constitution.1. Examination and repair of the electronic records systems by Israeli computing/legal experts, under accountability to the legislature.2. Establishment of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission relative to events surrounding the 2002 death of Supreme Court Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen and implementation of the current electronic record systems in the courts; 3. No court of any nation should be permitted to develop and implement its own electronic record systems.

"The time has come to reassess to impact of former Presiding Justices Aharon Barak and Dorit Beinisch on Human Rights, the justice system and the rule of law in the State of Israel," concludes Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert.

The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert for the UPR of the United States focused on conditions in Los Angeles County, California. The submission provided documentation of large-scale false imprisonment and real estate and financial institution fraud by California state judges, and refusal of the US federal government to initiate corrective actions. The submission was incorporated by reference into the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.” [5]

Joseph Zernik, PhD, the primary author of both submissions, has specialized over the past decade in analyzing the electronic record systems of courts, prisons, and banks. His reports on these subjects were peer-reviewed, published and presented in international computer science and criminology conferences. [6]LINKS:

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Facebook Badge

Twitter

Nov 2010 - Review of Human Rights in the US by the United Nations

In its April 2010 report submitted to the United Nations as part of the November 2010 - first ever - review of Human Rights in the United States, Human Rights Alert called for public validation of computerized information system of the US justice system.

About Me - Joseph Zernik, PhD

CONTACT: jz12345@earthlink.net

Dr Joseph Zernik gained substantial experience in records examination, particularly in examination of computerized court records. Dr Zernik published a report pertaining to PACER and CM/ECF, which was published in a peer-review computer science journal (see below), and reviewed hundreds of PACER dockets and related court records from US district courts and US courts of appeals across the United States.

Specific reports or opinions:

· April 2010 – Dr Zernik filed a report on Human Rights in Los Angeles County, California, as part of the first ever 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States. The report was incorporated into the staff report of the Human rights Council of the United Nations with a reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California". [i]

· August 2010 – Dr Zernik published a report in a peer-reviewed computer science journal, with editorial board including scholars from six European nations and Canada, opining fraud in the case management systems and online public access systems of the Los Angeles County jails (Inmate Information Center) - enabling large-scale false imprisonments under the pretense of lawfulness. [ii]

· August 2010 – Dr Zernik published a report in a peer-reviewed computer science journal, with editorial board including scholars from six European nations and Canada, opining fraud in the design of the case management and online public access systems of the United States courts (PACER and CM/ECF) - enabling the conduct of pretense litigations. [iii]

· April 2009 – Dr Zernik authored reports regarding Sustain, the case management system of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. Upon review of the reports, a leading computer science scholar, Prof Eliyahu Shamir, provided a qualified opinion, supporting Dr Zernik’s claims of fraud in the design and operation of the system, and calling on US computer science scholars to examine the integrity of the system. [iv]

· January 2009 – Dr Zernik’s opinion of fraud in specific litigation records of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, was reaffirmed by the opinion of Fraud Expert James Wedick, an FBI veteran, who had been decorated by the US Congress, US Attorney General, and FBI Director for his accomplishments in crime prevention. [v]

· ~August 2008 - Dr Zernik’s opinion of fraud in the underwriting and loan records of Countrywide Financial Corporation and related persons, was supported by the opinion of Fraud Expert Robert Meister, a Fraud Expert, who appears in courts across the United States. [vi,vii ,viii]

· ~August 2004 – Dr Zernik’s opinion of fraud in the online public access of the California Commission on Teachers Credentialing relative to teachers’ credentials in the Beverly Hills School District was confirmed after two lengthy investigations by the California Department of Education, which determined “The School District is out of compliance and in violation of the law”.

LINKS:

i 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the

2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report: