The solidest piece of evidence about 9/11 lies that seems
to be emerging is photographic footage of the disaster at the Pentagon, which shows, from a multiplicity of angles and sequences,
not a trace of the wreckage of a jetliner. A new video, "911 In Plane Site," convincingly exploits this contention with numerous
shots of flames inside the Pentagon behind a relatively unblemishedwall (where the plane was supposed to have hit) with
all its windows still unbroken.

After warning American citizens via her website about bribery
of U.S. immigration officials by illegal Muslims using sham marriages to secure green cards and citizenship, one of whom was
reportedly linked to lead 9-11 hijacker Mohamed Atta and Khalil bin Laden, Homeland Security whistleblower Mary Schneider
was removed last Thursday from her duties as an adjudications officer and directed to remain off the premises of the Orlando
Citizenship and Immigration Services.

CNN is reporting that 9/11 hijacker Ziad Jarrah's visa was
found in the remains of Flight 93 which went down in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

This is of course to reinforce the official story of 9/11 which
is crumbling under the weight of 9/11 research and activism. At least a third of the WTC victim's bodies were vaporized and
many of the victims of the Pentagon incident were burned beyond recognition. And yet visas and paper passports which identify
the purpotrators and back up the official version of events miraculously survive explosions and fires that we are told melted
steel buildings.

Our nation will be safer only when government does less, not
more. Rather than asking ourselves what Congress or the president should be doing about terrorism, we ought to ask what government
should stop doing. It should stop spending trillions of dollars on unconstitutional programs that detract from basic government
functions like national defense and border security. It should stop meddling in the internal affairs of foreign nations, but
instead demonstrate by example the superiority of freedom, capitalism, and an open society. It should stop engaging in nation-building,
and stop trying to create democratic societies through military force. It should stop militarizing future enemies, as we did
by supplying money and weapons to characters like Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. It should stop entangling the American people
in unholy alliances like the UN and NATO, and pledge that our armed forces will never serve under foreign command. It should
stop committing American troops to useless, expensive, and troublesome assignments overseas, and instead commit the Department
of Defense to actually defending America. It should stop interfering with the 2nd amendment rights of private citizens and
businesses seeking to defend themselves.

The final report released by the National Commission on Terrorist
Attacks on 9/11 is run-away nationwide bestseller in the nonfiction paperback category. But is it more fiction than fact?
The report contradicts itself in the very first chapter, repeatedly, and strains credulity in numerous instances throughout.
Here 9/11 truth activist Michael Kane breaks down chapter 1 of the report entitled, “We Have Some Planes,” in which the notification
and response of the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) and NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) is discussed.

A hijacked airliner never hit the Pentagon, and this film proves
it. As VonKleist, who both wrote and produced this masterpiece, asks in the film, "How does a plane 125 feet wide and 155
feet long fit into a hole which is only 16 feet across?"

Hijacking Catastrophe: 9/11, Fear & the Selling of Empire,
a documentary released by the Media Education Foundation . . . begins with a quote: “The people can always be brought into
the bidding of the leaders. That is easy,” and then proceeds with various quick clips of Ari Fleischer, George W. Bush, Dick
Cheney, and others who have made statements in our recent past linking Saddam Hussein with the events of 9/11; Iraq with Al
Quaida; and Hussein with weapons of mass destruction.

While the Washington Post scores in on the "notoriously close"
links between General Ahmad and Osama bin Laden, it fails to dwell on the more important question: what were Rep. Porter Goss
and Senator Bob Graham and other members of the Senate and House intelligence committees doing together with the alleged 9/11
"money-man" at breakfast on the morning of 9/11. In other words, the Washington Post report does not go one inch further in
begging the real question: Was this mysterious breakfast venue a "political lapse", an intelligence failure or something far
more serious? How come the very same individuals (Goss and Graham) who had developed a personal rapport with General Ahmad,
had been entrusted under the joint committee inquiry "to reveal the truth on 9-11."

With close connections to the key individuals who had control of the twin towers shortly before they were destroyed, the
obvious question is: Did Rupert Murdoch have prior knowledge of the impending Sept. 11, 2001, attacks?

Of particular note is that Edmonds did provide several hours
of secret testimony to the 9-11 Commission. Cutting to what she perceives as part of the US government's shortcomings, in
her present letter Edmonds strongly emphasizes an "unspoken policy of 'protecting certain foreign business relations' ...
'safeguarding certain diplomatic relations'", as substantively contributing to the general lack of candor she charges.

There's no doubt that a National Counterterrorism chief will
fulfill Brzezinski's dream of shrinking freedom for the American people. With the support of legislation, (The Patriot Act)
a compliant Supreme Court (unwilling to rule on even the most fundamental constitutional principles, as per Padilla vs. Rumsfeld)
and, now, an internal security apparatus for the surveillance and harassment of citizens; Bush will have achieved the "Trifecta"
he boasted of four years ago. The 9-11 Commission will have provided the final ingredient for absolute power; a blueprint
for an American Secret Police.

Now, without a complete list of our failures pre-9/11, without
a comprehensive examination of true symptoms that exist in our intelligence system, without assigning any accountability whatsoever
and, therefore, without a sound and reliable diagnosis, your commission is attempting to divert attention from the real problems
and to prescribe a cure through hasty and costly measures. It is like putting a gold-lined porcelain cap over a deeply decayed
tooth without first treating the root.