LivingSocial Tries to Win the Talent Wars By Training New Developers

Daily deal service LivingSocial just launched a new site called Hungry Academy to recruit developers. The twist: it’s recruiting people who aren’t developers yet. The new new recruits will be trained in Ruby and Ruby-on-Rails by Jumpstart Lab over five months in Washington, DC before having the opportunity to join the LivingSocial team. In many ways it sounds like an old fashion vocational apprenticeship.

At first blush, this seems like a great idea. There’s a talent war, and startups are going to great lengths to offer employees perks. But at the same time, even after a recent drop the unemployment rate in the U.S. remains over 8%. Meanwhile, tuition costs have increased faster than inflation, leaving many graduates in deep debt. There are lots of smart, motivated individuals that could make great startup employees but lack experience in software development, and lack the funds to go back to school to re-skill. There are also plenty of young people who would probably jump at the chance to by-pass a four year degree and get their feet wet as software developers in just five months.

But this is a difficult project. Paying employees who you don’t expect to be productive for at least five months is a big investment. Many, perhaps most college students struggle to learn to program and fail to learn even the most fundamental concepts. Computer science educators have been struggling with this issue for years.

There is, however, a rigorous application process and I imagine those who just can’t hack it will be dropped quickly. On the other hand, with salaries for developers approaching or in some cases exceeding six figures, not counting perks, this could end up being a bargain, depending on how much LivingSocial pays its staff. But Jumpstartlabs founder Jeff Casimir wrote on Hacker News: “Expect the during program salary to be a reasonable living wage in our expensive city and the full post-academy salary to be at or above other beginning developer positions,” so the company is at least claiming that it won’t skimp on compensation here.

LivingSocial offers no guarantee of a job for Hungry Academy “graduates” but those who do take a job at LivingSocial at the end will sign 18 month contracts.

As pointed out in the comments on Hacker News, the program is a little similar to Code Academy in Chicago. Unlike Hungry Academy, at Code Academy you pay $6,000 up-front. Many of the graduates get job offers from LivingSocial competitor GroupOn. Casimir is involved in both Code Academy and Hungry Academy and writes that the goal of the program is to be “better than college.”

Klint Finley is a Senior Writer at SiliconAngle. His specialtiesinclude IT services, enterprise technology and software development.Prior to SiliconAngle he was a writer for ReadWriteWeb. He's also aformer IT practicioner, and has written about technology for over adecade. He can be contacted at angle@klintfinley.com.

Premium Research

Wikibon argues strongly against Revolution towards a 3rd platform. The conclusion from this analysis is that applications will evolve; conversion should be avoided like the plague. The greatest opportunity is to continuously adapt today's operational applications by the addition of real-time or near real-time analytics applied directly to the current organizational processes and applications that support these processes. This is likely to translate to the greatest value to most organizations, and where possible avoid the risks of converting systems. The study of organizations that have applied real-time analytics to their current operational systems have shown incredible improvements in lower costs and greater adaptability. Business and IT executives should understand the enormous potential for adding decision automation through real-time analytics to current operational applications in their organizations. New technologies should be judged by their ability to support real-time analytics applied to operational systems, and supporting incremental improvement over time.

In a recent web-based survey conducted by Wikibon, 300 North American enterprises whom had either been utilizing, or considering the adoption of public cloud, answered questions regarding IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service) perceptions and usages. These questions varied in topic but were centered around an examination of which workloads were best suited for usage in the public cloud. This research examines a few additional key insights that shed some light on the growing IaaS world.

Today's Technology infrastructure management is largely non-differentiated and wasteful. Technology executives must re-think the strategic role of human capital and begin to implement new ways to consume IT as a service. This post draws on the learnings of senior executive Alan Nance from Royal Philips who is dogmatic in its approach to transforming its infrastructure to a service model.

There have only been two successful volume introductions into the marketplace in the last 50 years - DRAM and NAND flash. There has to be a clear volume case with good economics for 3D XP to be able to gain a foothold in consumer products. Without volume in the consumer space, there is unlikely to be much volume traction in the enterprise space. CIOs, CTOs and enterprise professionals should take a wait and see stance, and monitor the adoption of 3D XP in the consumer and military spaces. If and when there is volume production for 3D XP, enterprise adoption should start about two years later.

The use of open source software continues to accelerate and expand in the marketplace, especially in areas where technology is significantly disrupting established business models. IT organizations should be actively seeking to understand how open communities operate, how different licensing models work, and how they can be more actively engaged with both the vendors and communities that are shaping open source software.

CIOs understand that a clear cloud strategy is critical for IT today. Wikibon believes the biggest mistake organizations can make is converting major applications into the public cloud (including SaaS) without thinking about the implications to their existing business process workflows. Wikibon recommends that IT develop and implement a hybrid cloud strategy using the existing management workflows and compliance processes for both the public and private cloud components in the hybrid cloud.

In 2014, Wikibon defined a new category "Server SAN" that sits at the intersection of software-defined storage, hyperscale methodologies and converged infrastructure. This article is the executive summary of primary research that gives the status of the market, examines the vendor ecosystem, lays forth the revenue and 10 year forecast and gives direction for expansion beyond simple "hyperconverged infrastructure". This information is available for public consumption, the full research is available to Wikibon clients.

In this research paper, Wikibon looks back at the introductory Server SAN research, adjusts the Server SAN definition to include System Drag, and increases the speed of adoption of Server SAN based on very fast adoption from 2012 to 2014. The overall growth of Server SAN is projected to be about a 23% CAGR from 2014 to 2026, with a faster growth from 2014 to 2020 of 38%. The total Server SAN market is projected to grow to over $48 billion by 2026. The traditional enterprise storage market is projected to decline by -16% CAGR, leading to an overall growth in storage spend of 3% CAGR through 2026. Traditional enterprise storage is being squeezed in a vice between a superior, lower cost and more flexible storage model with Enterprise Server SAN, and the migration of IT towards cloud computing and Hyperscale Server SAN deployments. Wikibon strongly recommends that CTOs & CIOs initiate Server SAN pilot projects in 2015, particularly for applications where either low cost or high performance is required.

If containers are at the center of a shift in how applications are developers and delivered, and their pace of growth and change is unprecedented in IT history, this could have a massive ripple effect on both suppliers and consumers of the ecosystem of IT technologies.