Collegiate Sports

Kansas City

Syracuse, NY

Overview

Success in intercollegiate athletics today requires more than winning teams. It requires a detailed knowledge of, and scrupulous compliance with, a multitude of rules and laws.

It requires the management of staff and resources in a way that is fiscally sound as well as consistent with the educational mission of the institution, including educating and graduating student-athletes. It requires taking every precaution to protect institutional integrity in an area that can generate intense public attention, both positive and negative. In this complex environment, there are times when the best of efforts can go awry and additional resources are needed to meet these challenges.

The collegiate sports practice at Bond is the nation's premier practice group for the representation of colleges and universities in NCAA rules compliance, eligibility and infractions matters. With over 100 combined years of involvement and experience in NCAA-related matters, our attorneys and consultants are far and away the most qualified, capable and experienced in this area of unique and complex regulations.

Planning For and Addressing NCAA-Related Issues

The Collegiate Sports Practice Group is affiliated with Forward Progress Athletics Consulting and the two organizations work together when NCAA Academic Performance Program (APP) management is needed in conjunction with the Group’s NCAA rules compliance, eligibility and infractions counsel. This collaboration offers NCAA Division I collegiate sports clients the full breadth of NCAA regulatory and APP services delivered by the leaders in this field. For additional information on Forward Progress, follow this link: http://forwardprogressac.com/.

Our Team

What We Do

The lawyers in our group have earned a national reputation based on integrity and results. We have accomplished this by applying our considerable knowledge and experience to serve the needs of our clients, while assisting them in the fulfillment of their obligations as National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) - and National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics (NAIA) and National Junior College Athletics Association (NJCAA) - member institutions. The thoroughness of our investigations and reports in major infractions cases, combined with the strength of our strategies for corrective measures in compliance systems, have been repeatedly cited by the NCAA Committee on Infractions as significant factors in mitigating penalties for client institutions.

We also have recognized that prevention of violations is essential to both institutional control and cost containment, which are imperatives of intercollegiate athletics management. We help accomplish this by identifying compliance and monitoring systems' deficiencies that expose the institution to possible violations and by proposing strategies that strengthen these systems. Our consultations with clients have, in many cases, eliminated the need for further involvement of a more significant or serious nature.

Our working arrangements with clients are flexible with the goal of establishing an effective partnership with an institution and its legal counsel.

We believe the track record of our collegiate sports practice is unparalleled in both the scope and the magnitude of the NCAA-related matters for which we have been retained and the results we have achieved. We also have made a number of significant innovations and contributions to the practice area. Our experience includes:

Establishing the practice of including detailed reports on an institution's compliance system enhancements in institutional responses and reports to the NCAA Committee on Infractions. These reports consistently are cited among the key mitigating factors for imposing less than the minimum penalties prescribed by NCAA enforcement procedures.

Numerous successful appeals for reinstatement of eligibility for many student-athletes under the best conditions consistent with the individual situation.

The first successful presentation to the NCAA Committee on Infractions that allowed an institution to avoid a committee finding of a major violation in response to an allegation of lack of institutional control in an infractions case.

Representing a Division I institution and student-athlete in one of the first appeals to the NCAA Division I Administrative Review Subcommittee, resulting in the restoration of a season of competition to the student-athlete, and continuing representation of numerous institutions and student-athletes in that process.

Assistance to institutions in properly applying NCAA rules to specific situation and in working with the NCAA staff and interpretations process.

Representing a major Division I institution in the first infractions case to be processed under the summary-disposition procedure.

Our staff can assist your institution as it prepares for the NCAA certification process by providing an outside, independent assessment of your institution's compliance with the operating principles on which certification is based. This assessment, backed by our experience working with intercollegiate athletics programs nationwide, enables us to make practical recommendations to elevate your compliance programs to the level necessary for certification. Additionally, our group is capable in assisting institutions with the NCAAs latest requirement that its members produce and present annual Academic Progress Rate (APR) data on the academic progress of its student-athletes. Our staff is knowledgeable and well-versed in this new area of the legislation, and can assist institutions in making the appropriate calculations and assessments necessary to construct a complete, accurate report to the NCAA.

We believe we have set the standard in the design and implementation of NCAA and conference rules compliance programs. Our knowledge comes from our extensive firsthand infractions case experience, from having designed numerous preventive systems, and from having helped institutions implement new systems or refine current systems as issues are identified in infractions investigations or compliance reviews. Additionally, our group includes an individual with considerable experience in operating compliance systems on campus.

Over the past 16 years, our attorneys have conducted more than 100 potential major infractions case investigations. We have achieved unequaled results due to our ability to combine working cooperatively with NCAA and conference representatives with appropriately asserting the institutions', coaches' and student-athletes' rights, while fairly evaluating the evidence. In total, we have represented more than 60 Division I institutions and numerous Division II and III institutions in infractions cases. We also have been involved in several summary-disposition proceedings and, when appropriate, we assist institutions in processing the appeal of decisions in an infractions case. When, after all available evidence has been obtained, an alleged violation is not supported, we say so and support our conclusion. When an alleged violation is proven, we help the institution identify ways to enhance it's rules education and monitoring programs to ensure that the violation is not repeated.

Just as with infractions cases, we have extensive, successful experience in student-athlete eligibility reinstatement cases. Perhaps the most difficult aspect of preparing an appeal of an NCAA staff decision in an eligibility reinstatement case is that an institution generally only has limited experience with such cases and must rely on the NCAA staff for direction. When you retain us as your outside counsel, you benefit from our extensive knowledge and experience in reinstatement cases and our ability to present the circumstances in a manner that personalizes the case. As a result, your student-athletes have the best opportunity to receive a fair and appropriately considered result, and to return to competition as promptly as the facts permit.

In 2014, the NCAA Division I Board of Directors gave wide ranging discretion to the NCAA staff related to the regulation of student-athlete activity. That discretion empowers the NCAA staff to carefully evaluate and grant more waiver requests in favor of student-athlete welfare. With the recent hiring of Jason Montgomery, the Collegiate Sports Practice Group at Bond Schoeneck and King PLLC is announcing its expanded focus on waiver opportunities and assisting NCAA member institutions in this regard.

Jason brings an even greater level of experience to waiver cases involving student-athlete eligibility. During his tenure at the NCAA, Jason managed and was involved in the decision-making process for hundreds of waiver cases, and he frequently worked with NCAA member institutions to establish factors to help create favorable outcomes for student-athletes. Jason’s first-hand knowledge of, and experience in, the NCAA staff process provides NCAA member institutions with invaluable guidance concerning student-athlete eligibility matters.

Excerpt from the NCAA Division I Board of Directors January 18, 2014 Report

The NCAA Division I Board of Directors approved a Temporary Review Process for Specified Regulatory Waivers, Amateurism Certification Decisions and Student-Athlete Reinstatement Conditions until such time as a new governance structure is in place or a period of no longer than two years, at which time the process would be reevaluated. Specifically, after determining the impact of a prescribed penalty, the NCAA staff has been provided the authority consideration of mitigating factors that may justify departure from the established penalty or outcome in the following categories of cases:

Cases involving the health and safety of a student-athlete, or instances in which the prescribed penalty or outcome would likely have a significant negative impact on a student-athlete’s well-being.

Cases involving prospective or enrolled student-athletes who have served active duty in the military or who have delayed collegiate enrollment due to serving official religious missions.

Cases that involve the potential for significant withholding conditions (e.g., a year in residence and one or more seasons of intercollegiate competition, loss of all or part of final year of eligibility), despite the existence of circumstances indicating that the application of prescribed penalties is disproportionate or otherwise inconsistent with the intent of the legislation.

Our attorneys and consultants have more than a century of combined experience in addressing every aspect of the NCAA regulatory environment. We have successfully advocated and achieved positive results in student-athlete eligibility matters in all of the following categories:

The attorneys and consultants at Bond, Schoeneck & King are well versed in all aspects of the NCAA regulatory environment. Our Collegiate Sports Practice Group includes former members of the NCAA staff who know how to navigate the oftentimes daunting and confusing NCAA rules and NCAA eligibility processes. They have successfully advocated for student-athletes’ eligibility in a variety of complicated circumstances including NCAA initial-eligibility certifications, NCAA amateurism concerns, NCAA transfer situations and NCAA academic issues, among others.

To discuss your circumstances, contact Jason Montgomery. He is a veteran of the NCAA National Office and has experience working at a major NCAA Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) Division I school. Jason has extensive experience handling student-athlete eligibility matters. While at the NCAA, Jason was involved in the decision-making process for hundreds of waiver cases affecting student-athletes’ NCAA eligibility. Jason understands the NCAA process and is passionate about helping young athletes, their families and coaches understand their options and how to make the appropriate case for establishing and maintaining NCAA eligibility.

Bond's long-standing involvement in the law of higher education, combined with the athletics world experience of the firm's collegiate sports practice, puts us in a unique position to help an institution objectively assess and defend its athletics programs' compliance with Title IX requirements. This extensive experience also enables us to assist institutions in developing or refining a practical plan of action to address gender equity issues. Through the firm's higher education practice, we have assisted several institutions in their Title IX/Gender Equity reviews, have successfully defended institutions against which Title IX lawsuits have been brought, and have consulted institutions on potential Title IX lawsuits.

Events

News

Articles

Brochures

Success in intercollegiate athletics today requires more than winning teams. It requires a detailed knowledge of, and scrupulous compliance with, a multitude of rules and laws.

It requires the management of staff and resources in a way that is fiscally sound as well as consistent with the educational mission of the institution, including educating and graduating student-athletes. It requires taking every precaution to protect institutional integrity in an area that can generate intense public attention, both positive and negative. In this complex environment, there are times when the best of efforts can go awry and additional resources are needed to meet these challenges.

The collegiate sports practice at Bond is the nation's premier practice group for the representation of colleges and universities in NCAA rules compliance, eligibility and infractions matters. With over 100 combined years of involvement and experience in NCAA-related matters, our attorneys and consultants are far and away the most qualified, capable and experienced in this area of unique and complex regulations.

Planning For and Addressing NCAA-Related Issues

The Collegiate Sports Practice Group is affiliated with Forward Progress Athletics Consulting and the two organizations work together when NCAA Academic Performance Program (APP) management is needed in conjunction with the Group’s NCAA rules compliance, eligibility and infractions counsel. This collaboration offers NCAA Division I collegiate sports clients the full breadth of NCAA regulatory and APP services delivered by the leaders in this field. For additional information on Forward Progress, follow this link: http://forwardprogressac.com/.

The lawyers in our group have earned a national reputation based on integrity and results. We have accomplished this by applying our considerable knowledge and experience to serve the needs of our clients, while assisting them in the fulfillment of their obligations as National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) - and National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics (NAIA) and National Junior College Athletics Association (NJCAA) - member institutions. The thoroughness of our investigations and reports in major infractions cases, combined with the strength of our strategies for corrective measures in compliance systems, have been repeatedly cited by the NCAA Committee on Infractions as significant factors in mitigating penalties for client institutions.

We also have recognized that prevention of violations is essential to both institutional control and cost containment, which are imperatives of intercollegiate athletics management. We help accomplish this by identifying compliance and monitoring systems' deficiencies that expose the institution to possible violations and by proposing strategies that strengthen these systems. Our consultations with clients have, in many cases, eliminated the need for further involvement of a more significant or serious nature.

Our working arrangements with clients are flexible with the goal of establishing an effective partnership with an institution and its legal counsel.

We believe the track record of our collegiate sports practice is unparalleled in both the scope and the magnitude of the NCAA-related matters for which we have been retained and the results we have achieved. We also have made a number of significant innovations and contributions to the practice area. Our experience includes:

Establishing the practice of including detailed reports on an institution's compliance system enhancements in institutional responses and reports to the NCAA Committee on Infractions. These reports consistently are cited among the key mitigating factors for imposing less than the minimum penalties prescribed by NCAA enforcement procedures.

Numerous successful appeals for reinstatement of eligibility for many student-athletes under the best conditions consistent with the individual situation.

The first successful presentation to the NCAA Committee on Infractions that allowed an institution to avoid a committee finding of a major violation in response to an allegation of lack of institutional control in an infractions case.

Representing a Division I institution and student-athlete in one of the first appeals to the NCAA Division I Administrative Review Subcommittee, resulting in the restoration of a season of competition to the student-athlete, and continuing representation of numerous institutions and student-athletes in that process.

Assistance to institutions in properly applying NCAA rules to specific situation and in working with the NCAA staff and interpretations process.

Representing a major Division I institution in the first infractions case to be processed under the summary-disposition procedure.

Our staff can assist your institution as it prepares for the NCAA certification process by providing an outside, independent assessment of your institution's compliance with the operating principles on which certification is based. This assessment, backed by our experience working with intercollegiate athletics programs nationwide, enables us to make practical recommendations to elevate your compliance programs to the level necessary for certification. Additionally, our group is capable in assisting institutions with the NCAAs latest requirement that its members produce and present annual Academic Progress Rate (APR) data on the academic progress of its student-athletes. Our staff is knowledgeable and well-versed in this new area of the legislation, and can assist institutions in making the appropriate calculations and assessments necessary to construct a complete, accurate report to the NCAA.

We believe we have set the standard in the design and implementation of NCAA and conference rules compliance programs. Our knowledge comes from our extensive firsthand infractions case experience, from having designed numerous preventive systems, and from having helped institutions implement new systems or refine current systems as issues are identified in infractions investigations or compliance reviews. Additionally, our group includes an individual with considerable experience in operating compliance systems on campus.

Over the past 16 years, our attorneys have conducted more than 100 potential major infractions case investigations. We have achieved unequaled results due to our ability to combine working cooperatively with NCAA and conference representatives with appropriately asserting the institutions', coaches' and student-athletes' rights, while fairly evaluating the evidence. In total, we have represented more than 60 Division I institutions and numerous Division II and III institutions in infractions cases. We also have been involved in several summary-disposition proceedings and, when appropriate, we assist institutions in processing the appeal of decisions in an infractions case. When, after all available evidence has been obtained, an alleged violation is not supported, we say so and support our conclusion. When an alleged violation is proven, we help the institution identify ways to enhance it's rules education and monitoring programs to ensure that the violation is not repeated.

Just as with infractions cases, we have extensive, successful experience in student-athlete eligibility reinstatement cases. Perhaps the most difficult aspect of preparing an appeal of an NCAA staff decision in an eligibility reinstatement case is that an institution generally only has limited experience with such cases and must rely on the NCAA staff for direction. When you retain us as your outside counsel, you benefit from our extensive knowledge and experience in reinstatement cases and our ability to present the circumstances in a manner that personalizes the case. As a result, your student-athletes have the best opportunity to receive a fair and appropriately considered result, and to return to competition as promptly as the facts permit.

In 2014, the NCAA Division I Board of Directors gave wide ranging discretion to the NCAA staff related to the regulation of student-athlete activity. That discretion empowers the NCAA staff to carefully evaluate and grant more waiver requests in favor of student-athlete welfare. With the recent hiring of Jason Montgomery, the Collegiate Sports Practice Group at Bond Schoeneck and King PLLC is announcing its expanded focus on waiver opportunities and assisting NCAA member institutions in this regard.

Jason brings an even greater level of experience to waiver cases involving student-athlete eligibility. During his tenure at the NCAA, Jason managed and was involved in the decision-making process for hundreds of waiver cases, and he frequently worked with NCAA member institutions to establish factors to help create favorable outcomes for student-athletes. Jason’s first-hand knowledge of, and experience in, the NCAA staff process provides NCAA member institutions with invaluable guidance concerning student-athlete eligibility matters.

Excerpt from the NCAA Division I Board of Directors January 18, 2014 Report

The NCAA Division I Board of Directors approved a Temporary Review Process for Specified Regulatory Waivers, Amateurism Certification Decisions and Student-Athlete Reinstatement Conditions until such time as a new governance structure is in place or a period of no longer than two years, at which time the process would be reevaluated. Specifically, after determining the impact of a prescribed penalty, the NCAA staff has been provided the authority consideration of mitigating factors that may justify departure from the established penalty or outcome in the following categories of cases:

Cases involving the health and safety of a student-athlete, or instances in which the prescribed penalty or outcome would likely have a significant negative impact on a student-athlete’s well-being.

Cases involving prospective or enrolled student-athletes who have served active duty in the military or who have delayed collegiate enrollment due to serving official religious missions.

Cases that involve the potential for significant withholding conditions (e.g., a year in residence and one or more seasons of intercollegiate competition, loss of all or part of final year of eligibility), despite the existence of circumstances indicating that the application of prescribed penalties is disproportionate or otherwise inconsistent with the intent of the legislation.

Our attorneys and consultants have more than a century of combined experience in addressing every aspect of the NCAA regulatory environment. We have successfully advocated and achieved positive results in student-athlete eligibility matters in all of the following categories:

The attorneys and consultants at Bond, Schoeneck & King are well versed in all aspects of the NCAA regulatory environment. Our Collegiate Sports Practice Group includes former members of the NCAA staff who know how to navigate the oftentimes daunting and confusing NCAA rules and NCAA eligibility processes. They have successfully advocated for student-athletes’ eligibility in a variety of complicated circumstances including NCAA initial-eligibility certifications, NCAA amateurism concerns, NCAA transfer situations and NCAA academic issues, among others.

To discuss your circumstances, contact Jason Montgomery. He is a veteran of the NCAA National Office and has experience working at a major NCAA Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) Division I school. Jason has extensive experience handling student-athlete eligibility matters. While at the NCAA, Jason was involved in the decision-making process for hundreds of waiver cases affecting student-athletes’ NCAA eligibility. Jason understands the NCAA process and is passionate about helping young athletes, their families and coaches understand their options and how to make the appropriate case for establishing and maintaining NCAA eligibility.

Bond's long-standing involvement in the law of higher education, combined with the athletics world experience of the firm's collegiate sports practice, puts us in a unique position to help an institution objectively assess and defend its athletics programs' compliance with Title IX requirements. This extensive experience also enables us to assist institutions in developing or refining a practical plan of action to address gender equity issues. Through the firm's higher education practice, we have assisted several institutions in their Title IX/Gender Equity reviews, have successfully defended institutions against which Title IX lawsuits have been brought, and have consulted institutions on potential Title IX lawsuits.