mardi 29 janvier 2013

The European Jewish Congress on
Sunday demanded that the Sunday Times apologize for publishing a cartoon
depicting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu building a wall on top of
Palestinians with their blood standing in for cement.The uproar that erupted over the
cartoon was particularly offensive due to its publication on
International Holocaust Remembrance Day.

Jewish groups led by the American Jewish Congress (AJC) has demanded that popular German daily Stuttgarter Zeitung
apologize to Jewish people for publishing a cartoon which implies that
Netanyahu is ready to kill the latest Israel-Palestinian peace talks
initiated by John Kerry.(Cartoon below )Editors Note

The
caricature (top left) shows Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu
sitting on a park bench, pouring poison from a bottle labeled
“settlement construction” over a piece of bread which apparently he
intends to feed to a (Mahmoud Abbas) Palestinian peace dove.

“Israel lobby” used pressure and false allegations as leverage to pressure the institution to break an existing contract.

by Dr. Ludwig Watzal

13th August 2013. Due to the pressure from the “Israel lobby”, events
and exhibitions about Palestine can hardly take place in Germany
anymore. The pro- Zionist “Israel lobby” is well organized. When an
event is announced publicly, perfectly organized machinery is set in
motion, which exercises massive pressure on those who provide the
premises for a Palestinian event. Consequently, it has become almost
impossible to have an open discussion about Israel’s brutal occupation
and the colonization in Palestine.

The latest “success” of the public bullying of organizations was
garnered in Berlin. The cultural department of the Iranian Embassy in
Berlin wanted to organize a conference entitled “Palestine – Peace based
on justice” on Friday, August 16, 2013 at the educational institution
“Urania”. All formalities were cleared. Speakers were committed among
them the journalist Petra Wild who just published a book entitled
“Apartheid and ethnic cleansing of Palestine: The Zionist settler
colonialism in word and deed”, the film-makers Stefanie Landgraf and
Johannes Gulde who’s film “We refuse to be enemies” was highly acclaimed
but also defamed by the lobby in cooperation with one of the cities
deputy majors in Nuremberg, Dr. Gabi Weber who runs the organization
“Café Palestine” in Freiburg, Raif Hussein, the chairman of the
German-Palestine society, and Dr. Yavuz Özoguz who operates the website
“Muslim Market” who is also regularly defamed.

Because of the extent of bullying from the “Israel lobby”, the
director of “Urania”, Dr. Ulrich Bleyer, unceremoniously pulled back the
already given commitment. In addition to the usual extremist suspects,1 the chairman of the German-Israeli society, Reinhold Robbe (SPD), wrote a letter2
to Bleyer in which he not only misquoted the newly elected Iranian
President Hassan Rohani, but also sets this misquotation in relation to
the unspeakable German historical past. In this case, the “Israel lobby”
used pressure and false allegations as leverage to pressure the
institution to break an existing contract.

Dr. Bleyer wrote inter alia to the Iranian Embassy: “The program and
the research on the speakers can clearly expect that our statutory goal
of international understanding, which is also defined in the terms of
our agreements as a condition of hire is not respected.” Why didn’t the
director of “Urania” inform himself beforehand? He further was afraid
that the speakers could challenge “Israel’s right to exist” and
legitimize terrorism as “a form of resistance against an occupying
power”. Dr. Bleyer expected a “large number of protesters”, and “that
there will be clashes during the event or at the Urania.” The threats in
the protest letters must have been so intimidating that he has canceled
the event.

Cafe Palestine and Dr. Gabi Weber are increasingly in the crosshairs
of this lobby, too. It prevented a lecture by Prof. Christophe Oberlin
of the University of Paris on the topic “Plastic Surgery in Gaza” at the
University of Freiburg. The lobby is always operating on the same
pattern. Defame and put pressure on the institutions hoping that the
Germans are already buckling which they regularly do. “Café Palestine”
had to sue the University before the Administrative Court in Freiburg
and won.3

Bonn – Another
object of “desire” of the lobby is the traveling exhibition “Nakba –
flight and expulsion of Palestinians in 1948″, which is organized by
“Refugee children in Lebanon”, headed by Ms. Ingrid Rumpf. The
organizers and the local authorities are put under pressure by
German-Jewish and Israeli organizations. The goal is not about the
discourse on this dubious chapter in the history of Israel. With the
argument that the issue is one-sided and tendentious whose prohibition
is required and sometimes enforced. Like always, the “brave” Germans
buckle.

The problem is not so much the “power” of the “Israel lobby” but
rather the submissiveness of their German “friends”. If the lobby cannot
rely on their uncritical and vile support, they can easily refute
because the lobby does not have real arguments. Chas Freeman, a former
U. S. ambassador, was bullied by the “Israel lobby” before he could even
take a job in the Obama administration. His characterization of this
form of public bullying holds also true for the German branch4:
“The tactics of the Israel Lobby plumb the depths of dishonor and
indecency and include character assassination, selective misquotation,
and the willful distortion of the record, the fabrication of falsehoods,
and an utter disregard for the truth.”

It is high time for the Germans to recognize that the commitment for
freedom in Palestine has become a fight for our own freedom of speech.
Let aside the totalitarian control of all the peoples of the world by
the U. S. Empire.

Some AMERICAN FREE PRESS readers were upset by the firsttwo articles in this series reflecting on theproliferation of myths, phony documentsand fraudulent “quotations” muddying serious research into big issues of the day and events ofthe past. However, AFP’s job is to report the facts.

This week, we take a look at one particularly ubiquitous myth—a combination of myths—whichhas excited many: A variety of claims the Bush, Rockefeller and Rothschild families and a host of “Jewish bankers”—together or independently—helped finance Hitler’s rise to power.

The most cited source for the story Jewishbankers paved the way for Hitler is Hitler’s SecretBackers, supposedly by a Jewish banker named Sidney Warburg.

First of all, there was no Sidney Warburg. Butthose who actually read the spurious book (andmost who cite it haven’t read it) will find the unknown author says—in contrast to what peoplethink he said—that Jewish bankers didn’t financeHitler. Instead, the book claims some naughty non-Jewish bankers did so.

But even that isn’t true. An accurate assessmentby James Pool in Who Financed Hitler absolutelyrefutes the legend big banking or industrial interests played a substantial role funding Hitler. Most of theNazi Party’s money came from small contributionsand sales of literature.

No Rothschilds backed Hitler. That’s a myth. Onebanker, a practicing Christian of one-quarter Jewishdescent, was said—by one source, passing on a rumor—to have donated money to Hitler. And that’sit. The one Jewish banker known to have givenmoney to any Nazis gave it to elements in the Nazi party—the Strasser brothers—who were trying tostop Hitler.

And Hitler wasn’t descended from any Rothschilds or Frankenbergers. If he had any Jewishblood, it has never been authoritatively traced.

Some claim Hitler was pro-Zionist. They arewrong. For a brief period Hitler did encourage someZionists in efforts to promote Jewish immigration from Germany to Palestine, as described in EdwinBlack’s The Transfer Agreement. However, at thesame time, other Zionist forces were calling for war against Hitler as early as 1933.

The legendary “Nazi-Zionist collaboration” was atiny blip of no geopolitical consequence. But itmakes for great Internet chatter.

Others are hysterical over the fact American banks and corporations worked with the Naziregime, yet—despite the frenzy—this is neither amajor revelation nor is it extraordinary.

These were well-known arrangements, sometimes going back decades, with whatever German governmentwas in power.

Many think that Antony Sutton “proved” in Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler that Rockefeller-controlledStandard Oil funded Hitler. However, in his book, Sutton says flatly: “Standard Oil apparentlydid not finance Hitler’s accession to power.”

Some cite that same book as evidence the Bush family, with the Harriman banking interests, fundedHitler. In fact, Sutton says only that the Harrimans—like many American financial groups—had connectionsto corporate interests in Germany. And heconcludes that this “does not suggest that the Harrimansdirectly financed Hitler.” He never mentionsthe Bushes at all.

Another rumor claims the Bushes were part of a “fascist plot” to overthrow Franklin Roosevelt, oftenciting Jules Archer’s The Plot to Seize the White House. While there was a scheme to dislodge FDR—which many patriots believe to have been a goodthing—the book never mentions the Bushes, nor is there any other evidence they had anything to dowith that plot.

As Detective Sergeant Joe Friday used to say: “Just the facts.”

Michael Collins Piper
is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken
in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

Conspiracy Series Draws Angry Responses

By Michael Collins Piper

An almost audible sensation of palpable panic swept through the ranks of truth seekers as word spread about my recent series confronting, dissecting and laying to rest some myths, phony documents and fraudulent “quotations” that are iconic to many patriots. Some folks got angry because the truth contradicted popular long-cherished rumors and widely circulated downright lies people have come to accept as fact.

One reader threatened to cancel her subscription when she read that, in its next issue, AFP would demolish the widely believed (though false) stories that the Rockefellers, Rothschilds and Bushes joined together to bring Hitler to power.

This lady didn’t even wait to read the article. So devoted to the myths, she couldn’t bear the thought of them being disproven.

Another reader sent an angry email in response to that article asking, “How could you defend the Bushes?” when the article in AFP—long a foremost critic of the Bush dynasty—did not defend those gangsters but simply pointed out that so-called “evidence” purporting to “prove” they financed Hitler was just not true.

The reaction to my series demonstrates—too clearly—that the Internet has become a potentially dangerous “echo chamber” in which patriots talk to each other, often relying on unknown sources of information to supply what is often unreliable, even deliberately forged data to debate and disseminate.

What often happens is that agents of the power elite—those forces who control the media, the Federal Reserve monopoly and the international New World Order system—pose as “patriots,” say many of the “right things” and then proceed to spread their nonsense among patriots.

But because the enemy agents seem trustworthy—and since their “scoops” aren’t coming (at least not openly) from the garbage men of the rightly hated establishment media—real patriots tend to put their faith in the disinformation and unwittingly pass it on to others.

The consequence of this type of interaction, in what amounts to a virtual closed society, is that insidious elements take advantage of this circling-of-the-wagons by truth seekers and infiltrate Judas Goats and agents provocateurs into the midst of the good people to advance their own evil (although sometimes murky) agendas. Thus, patriots are misdirected, mis-used and set up for a fall.

One author has written of how one infamous cult shapes the worldview of its own members:

The totalist paradigm begins with shutting off the individual’s access to the outside world, so that his perceptions of reality can be manipulated without interference. The goal at this stage is to provoke expectable patterns of behavior that will appear to arise spontaneously. . . . Those who are beingmanipulatedmay come to endorse the goals andmeans of the group . . . or simply abandon the will to resist. In either case, the individual is robbed of the chance for independent action or self-expression.

Bottom line: Patriots need to keep their eyes and minds open and not be drawn into a whirlpool of propaganda and disinformation—a descent into a maelstromof frenzied rumors and hysterical and reckless behavior leading to public repudiation, even disaster.

Is Germany the Ultimate ‘Rogue Nation’?New book decisively counters the myth of “German villainy”

By Michael Collins Piper

Benton
L. Bradberry’s The Myth of German Villainy is a book about which this
reviewer can absolutely say, “I wish I’d written it myself.” The other
thing that can be said with certainty about The Myth of German Villainy
is this: Every American patriot needs to read this book, particularly
those who have—quite unsurprisingly—bought into a lot of the nonsense
about 20th century history pawned off by the controlled media and
bought-and-paidfor historians shilling for the New World Order elite.
Much of their nonsense has managed to find its way even into the
“alternative” media (particularly on the Internet) today.

A U.S.
naval officer and aviator for 22 years with a degree in political
science and international relations from the Naval Post Graduate School
in Monterey, Bradberry has given readers a fast-moving, fascinating and
well-written 440- page masterwork that accomplishes what few books can
do.

It deconstructs a complex and wide-ranging array of historical
data (covering a broad expanse of time) and makes it accessible and
interesting.

More importantly, it explodes the lies and propaganda
about the subject matter that has predominated in the mass media for
what has now been several generations.

Scholarly—but nonetheless
straightforward and easy to read—this is a comfortable book about many
uncomfortable topics, precisely because it constitutes a comprehensive,
head-on correction of the multiple historical distortions and outright
lies that have accompanied standard “mainstream” and now even
“alternative” writings on this subject. And beforemore sensitive readers
get too excited and sidetracked, let it be said right up front that The
Myth of German Villainy is not a book about “the Holocaust” and whether
it did—or didn’t—happen as New World Order-sponsored history books
claim. Instead, this book focuses on the often-forgotten bigger picture:
the perennial mischaracterization of Germany as the 20th century’s most
audacious warmonger, an aggressive, armed colossus bent on conquest of
Europe, if not the world itself.

While everyone today “knows”—having
been told so repeatedly—that Germany under Adolf Hitler was the big,
bad bully who started World War II, few remember (if they ever knewit in
the first place) that the same people who decided Germany was guilty of
causing the Second World War had also declared that Germany was
responsible for provoking the First World War.

However, in The Myth
of German Villainy, the author skillfully dissects a remarkable and
complex conglomeration of diplomatic intrigue and global power politics
at its highest and lowest order. He demonstrates, beyond any question,
that Germany was the real victim of both World War I and World War II.
Rather than being the instigator of war, Germany was instead the target
of British aggression, precisely because the “new Germany” that arose
under Hitler stood in direct challenge to the aims of imperial Britain,
which had for all intents and purposes emerged as the global armof
thewould-beworld empire of the Rothschild banking family based in the
City of London. It’s all about money.

And if you follow the money,
it will take you right back to the international intrigues of the
Rothschilds and their propagandists in the controlled media who have
done so much to stilt the truths about history that Bradberry bends back
into reality. Among other things, the author accurately summarizes life
in Germany under Hitler—the truth about which is far from the average
depiction of a Gestapo-run tyranny, a popular (and quite mythical) image
unfortunately perpetuated in a lot of “patriot” publications today.
Bradberry also delves into the ugly history of communism and how that
failed system—at its pinnacle—was responsible for somuchwar and
bloodshed that set the stage for Germany’s frontline challenge to this
rampaging force that posed a direct challenge to the very survival of
Western Christian Civilization.

There is much more that could be
said about this wonderful book, but let this final point be noted: As an
honest, objective primer on the long-hidden realities of 20th-century
history as it relates to the events of both world wars—and their
aftermath—you will search far and wide to find anything that does such a
fine job in bringing history into accord with the facts.

Get Your Copy of the January/February 2014 Issue of TBR
By Michael Collins Piper

The
January/February issue of THE BARNES REVIEW is a very special issue of
THE BARNES REVIEW. Why? There aren’t many magazines anywhere—maybe we
should say “there aren’t any magazines anywhere”—that would take the
position that Adolf Hitler, rather than being a monstrous mass murderer,
was in fact a hero to his people.

Well, TBR takes that position, without hesitation and with no apology. And the reason for that is that no apology is necessary.

The
truth is on TBR’s side and—as the wide-ranging material in this issue
clearly demonstrates—the truth about Hitler and Third Reich Germany
(both from a domestic standpoint and within the context of Germany’s role
in global affairs prior to and during World War II) is far different
fromwhat has been painted by the mass media and academia.

There’s
much more to the story than just “the Holocaust”—that recurring mantra
to which we are subjected on a relentless basis (and which TBR quite
regularly addresses froma Revisionist standpoint,much to the dismay of
those who worship at the altar of the Holocaust Industry)—and this issue
of TBR tries to fill in some of the many missing pieces of the puzzle
in the bigger picture.

That’s why we are so enthusiastic about this
particular “theme” issue: It underscores the critical need for honest
reporting about the people and events in history that have brought us to
where we are today.

So we are especially interested in hearing from
potential readers about what we have presented in the pages of this
issue—the first issue of volume 20. It is entirely unlike anything
they’ll have ever read in any mainstream magazine, newspaper or
textbook. And that’s precisely what TBR’s underlying message is all
about: Bringing history into accord with the facts and tearing down the
wall of lies about history.

To get a copy of this issue for $10, send
payment to TBR, P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003 or call
1-877-773-90771-877-773-9077 toll free to charge. If you decide to subscribe to TBR
after reviewing the issue, we will take $10 off the subscription price
of $46 (U.S.) and send you all new issues as they are published (five
more issues) for 2014! Mention the ad in AFP issue 6 when responding.

‘Best Ever’—‘Most Controversial’ Issue of TBR Yet?

By Michael Collins Piper

The January/February issue of THE BARNES REVIEW is a very special issue. Why? There aren’t many magazines anywhere—maybe we should say “there aren’t any magazines anywhere”—that would take the position that Adolf Hitler, rather than being a monstrous mass murderer, was in fact a hero to his people.
Well, TBR takes that position, without hesitation and with no apology. And the reason for that is that no apology is necessary.
The truth is on TBR’s side and—as the wide-ranging material in this issue clearly demonstrates—the truth about Hitler and Third Reich Germany (both from a domestic standpoint and within the context of Germany’s role in global affairs prior to and during World War II) is far different from what has been painted by the mass media and academia.
There’s much more to the story than just “the Holocaust”—that recurring mantra to which we are subjected on a relentless basis (and which TBR quite regularly addresses froma Revisionist standpoint,much to the dismay of those who worship at the altar of the Holocaust Industry)—and this issue of TBR tries to fill in some of the many missing pieces of the puzzle in the bigger picture.
That’s why we are so enthusiastic about this particular “theme” issue: It underscores the critical need for honest reporting about the people and events in history that have brought us to where we are today.
So we are especially interested in hearing from potential readers about what we have presented in the pages of this issue—the first issue of volume 20. It is entirely unlike anything they’ll have ever read in any mainstream magazine, newspaper or textbook. And that’s precisely what TBR’s mission is all about: Bringing history into accord with the facts and tearing down the wall of lies about history.
To get a copy of this issue for $10, send payment to TBR, P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003 or call 1-877-773-90771-877-773-9077 toll free to charge. If you decide to subscribe to TBR after reviewing the issue, we will take $10 off the subscription price of $46 (U.S.) and send you all newissues as they are published (five more issues) for 2014! Mention the ad in AFP issue 7 when responding.

Despite
all the historical truth that is available from AMERICAN FREE PRESS and
our history journal, THE BARNES REVIEW, there is still a surprising
number of seemingly good patriots who believe certain fabrications—much
of it old war-time propaganda—that circulate in the mass media today. It
is as if these folks don’t believe much of anything the media tells
them except when it comes to the subject of World War II, and Adolf
Hitler, in particular.
There are more than a few hustlers who are
guilty of this but one who recently came to my attention is Donald Mc
Ilvaney, who sells precious metals from what he calls an “explicitly
Christian, conservative” perspective. A recent McIlvaney newsletter,
relating to Hitler, was so full of nonsense I was moved to write the
author and tell him so.
McIlvaney referred to Hitler’s “seizure of
control” in Germany. I reminded him Hitler had the backing of over 90
percent of the German people. Cautioning him that his criticisms of
Hitler were hardly a position for a professed “anti-communist” to take, I
pointed out it was Hitler who turned back communist leader Josef
Stalin’s plan to invade and occupy Europe. Without Hitler’s leadership,
all of Europe would have fallen to Stalin. The fact is that the West
therefore owes Hitler a great debt.
Mc Ilvaney suggested that Hitler
started World War II. In fact—as I explained to this self-styled
“intelligence advisor”—the record clearly shows Hitler did literally
everything to avoid war with England and the United States. It was
England that declared war on Germany, not the other way around. And even
after war erupted, Hitler still hoped for peace and sought to avoid
further bloodshed, even permitting nearly 200,000 English soldiers to
evacuate Dunkirk—men the Germans could easily have killed or captured.
Unfortunately,
Hitler was forced to deal with the drunken Winston Churchill and the
mentally sick Franklin D. Roosevelt, who lusted after war, knowing it
would bring him a third and fourth term.
Prior to FDR, all presidents—following the example of George Washington—restricted their tenure to two terms.
Here’s
how I assessed the matter for McIlvaney: “FDR and Churchill wanted war
and they got it. Everyone who died in that unnecessary and destructive
struggle was killed needlessly—at least 27,226,000 innocent Europeans.
The piling up of debt to pay for it is something you should be
interested in. American taxpayers are still paying for that and will be
so long as the dollar lasts. You, with your enchantment with numbers,
should know that.”
I told Mc Ilvaney he needs to study authentic,
Revisionist history, not Establishment, Jewish propaganda. As a
Bible-believing Christian, Mc Ilvaney surely realizes no one may serve
two masters—that Satan is the father of lies.
If Mc Ilvaney—and a lot
of other “patriot” writers and broadcasters I won’t mention by name
just now—intend to talk about history, they need to get their facts
straight and stop passing on hallucinations and flat out lies.

Version anglaise: "But
I must also draw Mr. Roosevelt's attention to one or two mistakes in
history. He mentions Ireland, for instance, and asks for a statement to
the effect that Germany will not attack Ireland. Now, I have just read a
speech delivered by Mr. de Valera, the Irish Taoiseach (Prime
Minister), in which strangely enough, and contrary to Mr. Roosevelt's
opinion, he does not charge Germany with oppressing Ireland, but
reproaches England with subjecting Ireland to continuous aggression.

With
all due respect to Mr. Roosevelt's insight into the needs and cares of
other countries, it may nevertheless be assumed that the Irish Taoiseach
would be more familiar with the dangers which threaten his country than
would the President of the United States.

Similarly
the fact has obviously escaped Mr. Roosevelt's notice that Palestine is
at present occupied not by German troops but by the English; and that
the country is undergoing restriction of its liberty by the most brutal
resort to force, is being robbed of its independence and is suffering
the cruelest maltreatment for the benefit of Jewish interlopers. (...)

The
Arabs living in that country would therefore certainly not have
complained to Mr. Roosevelt of German aggression, but they are voicing a
constant appeal to the world, deploring the barbarous methods with
which England is attempting to suppress a people which loves its freedom
and is merely defending it.

This, too, is perhaps a
problem which in the American President's view should be solved at the
conference table, that is, before a just judge, and not by physical
force or military methods, by mass executions, burning down villages,
blowing up houses and so on.

For one fact is surely
certain. In this case England is not defending herself against a
threatened Arab attack, but as an uninvited interloper, is endeavoring
to establish her power in a foreign territory which does not belong to
her"

VIDEO - Deanna Spingola reads from the book: The Transfer Agreement Boycott Fever of 1933 by Professor Udo Walendy. This 40 page booklet goes
into all of the pertinent background information regarding the
declaration of war against Germany by self-described "World Jewry" or
"Judea" , and their global boycott of German goods and services, based
upon anti-German propaganda. Their stated objective was to bring Germany
to destroy Germany. They began to implement this plan as soon as the
National Socialists came to power in order to undermine Hitler, and
thereby, subvert the will of the German people who had elected his party
and it's economic rescue plan.
You can read the illustrated and sourced booklet for yourself here.

Three current news stories—taken together—illustrate that
things are not always as they seem. Take, for example, a new revelation about
the Bilderberg group released by Internet voice Alex Jones in the wake of last
week’s Bilderberg meeting in Virginia, where Jones joined a crowd jeering the
assembled would-be world rulers.

Although Jones has insisted Bilderberg is some sort of
remnant of the Nazi regime of Adolf Hitler devoted to a modern-day Nazi agenda,
a report on Jones’s own website effectively admits Bilderberg’s program is
distinctly anti-Nazi.

Citing the papers of former Sen. Fred Harris (D-Okla.), who
attended Bilderberg’s 1966 meeting in Wiesbaden, Germany, Jones points out that
Harris recorded the remarks of top Bilderberg figure, labor leader Walter
Reuther, who outlined Bilderberg’s underlying agenda: “Nationalism is
dangerous.”

WWII-era German National Socialism—Nazism —of course, was
very much nationalist in every sense, and the fact nationalism was denounced at
Bilderberg gives a clear picture of the real Bilderberg point of view, rumors
notwithstanding.

Jones mentions Bilderberg’s founder, Prince Bernhard of the
Netherlands, had been a Nazi Party member. But what Jones does not mention is that
Bernhard left the party in 1934, a year after Hitler came to power, and by 1940
was a top leader of the anti-Nazi resistance in Europe. So by the time Bernhard
became Bilderberg chief, he had undergone a serious political transformation.

What’s more, as careful historians know, Hitler held
Bernhard in contempt. In his recorded Table Talk* and in the memoirs of his
valet, Hitler is recalled scoffing satirically at Bernhard, and questioning his
intelligence, integrity and loyalty.

The forces leading Bilderberg are anti-Nazi, particularly the
Rothschild dynasty, whose assets were seized by the Nazis, belying a popular
myth that “the Nazis never touched the Rothschilds.”

*Hitler’s Table Talk

——

Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and
radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan,
Canada and the U.S. He is the author of Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, The
High Priests of War, Dirty Secrets, The New Babylon, Share the Wealth, The
Judas Goats, Target: Traficant and The Golem.

Excerpt from an article entitled

“New World Order Pledged to Jews,” in the New York Times (1940)

“In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the
outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the
British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when
victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a New World Order
based on the ideals of ‘justice and peace.’”Did Adolf Hitler serve the New World Order Agenda?
The answer is clearly, NO HE DID NOT! However, what does serve the
NWO agenda are the endless lies and the “bogeyman” image being
promulgated and promoted by disinfo agents in the so-called “truth
movement” who claim to be “fighting the New World Order agenda” !Ask yourself, “who benefits” from the perpetuation of these lies?
In closing, I will add that, while military operations were
(officially) halted in 1945 and victory declared by the ALL LIES, the
war against Hitler, against Germany and against the Germans did NOT end,
but continues unabated to this day. Germany is still, for all intents
and purposes, an occupied and foreign controlled nation, and is still
being held for ransom in an extortion racket which had it’s roots in
1933. We are still waiting for “justice and peace” which obviously did
NOT come out of World War II as advertised.
Only the truth will set us free!
WAHRHEIT MACHT FREI!

PS I will be Deanna Spingola’s guest on Wednesday, April 10th, 2013. I hope you will tune in if you can, and we will welcome your calls in the 2nd hour too.

PREFACECHAPTER I"We Are Fighting In Defense of Freedom" (Lord Halifax)CHAPTER II" We Are Meeting a Challenge to Our Own Security" (Lord Halifax)CHAPTER III"We are defending therights of all Nations to live their own lives" and "fighting against the substitution of brute force for Law as the arbiter between Nations." (Lord Halifax)CHAPTER IV"We Are Fighting Against the Violation of the Sanctity of Treaties and Disregard of the Pledged Word" (Lord Halifax)CHAPTER V"We Are Fighting Today for the Preservation of Christian Principles" (The (London) Times, 17th Feb. 1940)CHAPTER VI"We Are Fighting As Our Fathers Fought to Uphold the Doctrine That All Men Are Equal In the Sight of God" (Franklin D. Roosevelt, 6th Jan. 1942)CHAPTER VII "We Are Fighting for Democracy"CHAPTER VIII The Theory That High Finance Caused the WarCHAPTER IX The Object Is to Destroy Fascism and HitlerismCHAPTER XUnprepared and BlindfoldedCHAPTER XIHitler Always Knew His Real EnemyCHAPTER XIIHitler Wanted Peace With BritainCHAPTER XIIIHow Britain Was Egged On to Make WarCHAPTER XIVThe Jews Acknowledge Their Power and ThreatenCHAPTER XVThe Jews Declare WarCHAPTER XVIThe Jewish WarCHAPTER XVIIThe Peace: Britain Defeated Whoever WinsCHAPTER XVIIIConclusion

Chapter VIII

THE THEORY THAT HIGH FINANCE CAUSED THE WAR

There is a school of thought which believes that International Finance with
its preponderant Jewish interest and the Monetary System under which most of
the world has suffered from mass unemployment was doomed to be
superseded by Hitler's credit system based upon a goods standard and
international barter. This would displace gold, the tool of the Internationalists.
I believe this myself.

But some go so far as to say that the war was brought about so that, if
Hitler could be defeated, the Gold Standard Monetary System, which is
fraudulent, could be maintained to the benefit of Wall Street and other large
Gold Controllers.

I do not believe that.

It might be worth a war from the point of view of Wall Street, but it
would not be worth this war. This war shows every trace of our having been
dragged into it blindfolded and unprepared. Wall Street would not have
allowed that.Wall Street knows that if the Germans won the war, there would
be no more Wall Street.

In my opinion there was more to it than the survival of the fraudulent
Gold Standard System. The necessities of racial survival made it urgent for the
Jews to act without delay. Their considerable influence in Wall Street together
with other participants in the spoils of the fraudulent system made it not too
difficult to get the "Street" to support a war which was represented as
inevitable.

This is not the place to go into the intricacies of monetary systems. The
kernel of the problem is that credit based upon gold is insufficient for the needs
of modern commerce. A short supply of money and credit is best for the usurer
or money-lender, since scarcity raises the rate of interest borrowers must pay.
Power to regulate the amount of money and credit available enables the
controllers of Gold to dominate world affairs, economically and politically. The
creation of inextinguishable national debts is part of the system of control and
with control goes domination. This system of economic and financial bondage
was doomed by the expansion of the barter system developed by National
Socialist Germany. (For a more detailed explanation see the chapter, The Peace
We Lost in A PEOPLE'S RUNNYMEDE, by Robert Scrutton, Andrew Dakers,
publisher.)

Chapter IX

The Object is to Destroy Fascism and Hitlerism

At last we approach facts.

Certainly
we went to war with the object of destroying Fascism and Hitlerism. But
the people were not allowed to know this till it was too late to
withdraw, or they would not have sanctioned it, had they had an
opportunity to do so. It was not Hitler or a Fascist form of Government
that was objected to but that both opposed the Jewish influence in their
domestic affairs.

President Roosevelt, in a letter to the International Labour Office Conference in 1944, said:

"The
welfare of the world's population and their liberty are the first and
ultimate concern of those dedicated to root out from this earth every
trace of Nazi ideas and Nazi methods."

The London Times' leading article of 26th September 1939, said:

"We
have gone to war with the single-minded determination to rid Europe of a
particular menace whose presence is incompatible with the continuance
of civilized life, and it is the simplicity of this claim that resolves
what the Duce feels to be inconsistency in our discrimination between
Hitler and his Russian accomplice. We believe that the Russian action,
lawless and treacherous as we must declare it to be, is a secondary and
subordinate consequence of the original crime. The Soviet has not been a
party to Hitler's previous outrages and has not shown itself to be in
essence an aggressive power."

The Duce was not the only
man to see inconsistency in the discrimination in favour of the
Soviets, despite this dead-lame explanation.

On plenty
of other occasions, politicians have assured us that we are fighting to
destroy Fascism. But they do not tell us why they deem it so necessary.
There was a time when it did not appear to be a necessity to Winston
Churchill. In his Great Contemporaries he wrote:

"Those
who have met Herr Hitler face to face in public business or on social
terms have found a highly competent, cool, well-informed functionary
with an agreeable manner, a disarming smile."

Again in STEP BY STEP, Churchill wrote of Herr Hitler:

"If
our country were defeated, I hope we should find a champion as
indomitable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among
the nations."

But of Russia, Churchill said in 1920:

"The Soviet system is barbarism worse than the Stone Age."

In a broadcast on 20th January 1940 he said:

"Everyone can see how Communism rots the soul of a nation . . ."

And later in the year on 1st April, he said:

"Communism is a deadly mental and moral disease."

From
this it is not understandable why Churchill should be leading the
British Empire in a war to destroy National Socialism with the aid of
Bolshevik Russia.

Of Italian Fascism, Churchill said in a speech on 11th November 1938:

"Italy
has shown that there is a way of fighting the subversive forces and
rallying the masses of the people, properly led, to value and wish to
defend the honour and stability of civilized society. Hereafter no great
nation will be unprovided with an ultimate means of protection against
the cancerous growth of Bolshevism."

As far back as 1926 the Financial News reported that a Committee of British Residents in Florence announced:

"We
wish to state most clearly and emphatically that there exists here
today nothing that can be justly termed either tyranny or suppression of
personal freedom as guaranteed by constitutional law in any civilized
land. We believe that Mussolini enjoys the enthusiastic support and
admiration of the Italian people who are contented, orderly and
prosperous to a degree hitherto unknown in Italy, and probably without
parallel at the present time among other great European nations still
suffering from the war."

Sympathetic readers will
smile when they are reminded that in 1933 the Financial Times brought
out a special eight-page Supplement under the caption:

The Renaissance of Italy Fascism's Gift of Order and Progress

The
solution of the mystery is that in those days Fascism had not yet
grappled with Jewish influences dominating the nation's affairs.
Giuseppe Toeplitz, Polish born Jew, had just retired from the management
of the Banca Commerciale Italiana, which a New York Times dispatch from
Milan on January 29, 1938 (the date of Signor Toeplitz's death)
estimated controlled one-seventh of all Italian industries.

We
Fascists have noticed with amusement how our own Government is forced
by the pressure of necessity to adopt many of the policies of Fascism.
We may instance the recognition of Agriculture as basic among the
industries; the necessity of ensuring that the Land is not misused by
those farming it and the corporative organization of certain industries
and professions.

The International Labour Office
issued a report in April 1944 in which the activities of the German
Labour Front established by Hitler were recommended to be "adapted for
future use" after our victory. Facilities for workmen's travel,
recreation and other sparetime activities, for vocational training and
research on labour protection; the "Beauty of Work" service — "Kraft
durch Freude" (Strength through Joy) in the National Socialist Labor
Program — and the Labour Bank, "one of the chief credit institutions . .
. of the whole of Europe"; "it should also be the responsibility of the
Labour Commissioners," the Report of I.L.O. further outlines, "to
continue all administrative services required for the administration of
labor and social legislation — employment services, social insurance and
the labour inspectorate." The I. L. O. Philadelphia Labor Charter
actually purloins direct from Fascism its notions of industrial
organizations! "It insists," says the London Times of 13th May 1944, "on
the employers' right to combine freely, and declares also that if
workers and employers combine to run industry collectively, there must
be a third element — the Government — to cooperate and see that the rest
of the community is not exploited." Similar proposals are found in the
1944 Report on Reconstruction issued by the Grand Council of the Trade
Union Congress.

It was on these principles that the
Fascist Corporative Organization of Industry was based! Then why should
we be so keen to destroy all this? There can be but one plausible
answer. National Socialism and Fascism opposed the Jewish influence in
the domestic affairs of their respective countries. That we have ample
proof that National Socialism and Fascism were good governments for the
Germans and the Italians of their respective countries, apparently, is
of no consideration. Is it that only Jewish interests matter the world
over?

We may venture to doubt whether better
Government for "liberated" Italy than the Fascist one can be achieved
with the material at hand. Just consider this London Times report of the
25th April 1944:

"As most members of the new Cabinet
are Republicans, a form of procedure was devised whereby Ministers,
before taking oath, signed a declaration stating that they had accepted
office with the purpose of serving the best interests of the country,
but without attaching any permanent significance to the ceremony."

It
was from such "accommodating scoundrels" as this that Fascism saved
Italy for twenty years. At the time of this writing, every so-called
"liberated" country begins a campaign of violence and outrage against
its most active anti-communist elements. The same conditions are at once
reproduced from which their Fascist or semi-Fascist Governments of the
past had saved them.

“John Joseph Loftus (February 12, 1950) is an American author, former
U.S. government prosecutor and former Army intelligence officer. He is a
president of The Intelligence Summit and, although he is not Jewish, a
president of the Florida Holocaust Museum. Loftus also serves on the
Board of Advisers to Public Information Research.(...)

He began working for the U.S. Department of Justice in 1977 and in
1979 joined their Office of Special Investigations, which was charged
with prosecuting and deporting Nazi war criminals in the US. Loftus’
now-expired Web site claimed, “As a young U.S. Army officer, John Loftus
helped train Israelis on a covert operation that turned the tide of
battle in the 1973 Yom Kippur War.”(...)

He also writes regularly for Ami, an Orthodox Jewish weekly news magazine.

On August 7, 2005, he provided the United States address of an
alleged terrorist named Iyad K. Hilal on Fox News. Only afterwards was
it revealed that Hilal had left the address three years previously and
the home was now owned by a family, which was then subjected to threats
and vandalism and required police protection as a result of Loftus’
words. Fox terminated Loftus’s contract to commentate after the event.
Loftus said “I thought it might help police in that area now that we
have positively identified a terrorist,” but he did not say why he did
not contact police in a more direct manner. Loftus apologized for the
mistake and expressed frustration about “one federal [agency’s]”
inaction on an earlier tip he had given them years ago due to the same
address." [Wikipedia.org]

John
Loftus - Author of The Secret War Against the Jews, a new book which
claims that anti-Israel partisans in the American intelligence community
have sought to sabotage the state of Israel. (Loftus is a former
attorney with the Nazi-hunting Office of Special Investigations.)