With the eye of a digital photographer, and the skill of a webmaster:blogger I bring you Super photos,excellent video,large sound, and a fun experience. Hundreds of celebrity video and photos. Now Pinterest Share On Every Image! This Site Cell Phone Friendly

Michael DuPuy"... and a third of all the fishes in the oceans, and a third of all the birds of the air, and a third of all the beasts of the land... all died... and a third of all mankind also perished..."

Ken CloudDo you really believe that the radioactivity will be 'diluted' by the ocean currents? If it were that simple, why not dump all radioactive material in the ocean? I am not taking that chance. No Pacific seafood for me...forever.

Ken CloudUpon reading the 'other side of the story' more closely, it does nothing to debunk the bad news. E.g.: about the 'California sized' debris - all the article says is ' no it isn't' , no proof offered , no source cited. It would be foolish to trust that kind of 'reporting' with the stakes so high.Completely ignored is the FACT that the reactor housing , 100 feet off the ground, is crumblimg and the 23 hot fuel rods MUST be extracted and cooled immediately. If two rods touch, fission results and the Worst Case Scenario ensues. Meanwhile TEPCO and the government of Japan are close to passing a gag law on press reporting on Fukushima.Which part of this are you willing to ignore?

Tammy Lenz-DomikeThere are plenty of things to be afraid of, but this fear mongering is baseless. And, Ken Cloud, I live on the coast and would tell you if this much debris were washing up. What we've actually been warned about, is to not pick up metal tubes that wash ashore, because they are unexploded depth charges our Navy is using, and they are filled withwhite phosphoreses,that will burn through anything known to man.

Ken CloudFearmongering? "Total atmospheric releases from Fukushima so far are between 5.6 and 8.1 times that of Chernobyl, according to the 2013 World Nuclear Industry Status Report. Prof. Komei Hosokawa, who wrote the Fukushima section, told London’s Channel ...See More

Carla WilliamsonHow could an ongoing (continuing) nuclear disaster of these proportions not affect sea creatures, as well as any land mass full of people in its path? I do believe there has been an attempt to diminish the truth and cover it to some degree to keep people from panicking so the fish industry will not suffer and people will not rise up and protest further. Just my humble opinion.

Gary GraefenIt is hardly fear mongering to detail an out of control situation for over 2 years now that could have ramifications that can last over 2000 years-sorry to pop your blissful bubble. Go ahead an start eating pacific seafood.

Ken CloudSo Tammy:a statement from the 2013 World Nuclear Industry Status report is "conspiracy theory"? The industry is involved in a conspiracy to downgrade itself??? Are You making sense? I purposely cited an INDUSTRY evaluation instead of an environmental group report.

Gary GraefenFried is a sensational headline-but the radioactivity being dumped into the ocean is being found in fish all over the pacific. It is cumulative, the fish will becomemore and more radioactive until they die. Animals at the top of the food chain-like us, will get higher dose exposure if you eat the fish. Saftey levels I consider a joke. There is no safe level of radioactivity-just levels that won't kill you. But any abnormal level can cause cancer in young people at a later date.

Ken CloudTEPCO itself and Japan's government acknowledge publicly that about 400 TONS of contaminated water DAILY are being discharged into the ocean directly . Radioactivity is not water soluble so that it dissipates after a couple of weeks!! "CRACKPOT:? Do you think commercial fishermen are going to advertise that their product may be unfit to eat??You live there and don't want this to be happening, I get that. But turning a blind eye is akin to climate change deniers. I wish that you were correct. I fear that you are not

Gary GraefenYour wrong Ann, I live in Tacoma-the west coast fishing industry is worth trillions-so there is a giant vested interest in keeping quiet as long as possible. Yes there are crackpot sites-that doesn't negate "THE FACT" that radio active water is being dumped daily into the pacific. It doesn't just magically dissolve. Women seem to think that our government will tell them when things are unsafe. Did your government tell you they were spying on you?-of course not. Did they tell the hundreds of soldiers they exposed deliberately to radioactivity-NO. That is also a historical fact. No one is going crazy-Because no one wants to talk about it.