European court says Spanish eviction laws illegal

FOR STORY SPAIN EVICTIONS - FILE - In this Nov. 18, 2011 file photo, Grandmother Tomasa Morcillo, 87, picks up her personal belongings as she and her family are evicted from their home in Madrid because they are unable to keep up their mortgage payments. The European Court of Justice in Luxembourg has ruled Thursday March 14, 2013, that harsh property repossession laws in Spain violate EU laws on consumer protection. Hundreds of thousands of evictions have taken place during Spain’s deep rec
— AP

FOR STORY SPAIN EVICTIONS - FILE - In this Nov. 18, 2011 file photo, Grandmother Tomasa Morcillo, 87, picks up her personal belongings as she and her family are evicted from their home in Madrid because they are unable to keep up their mortgage payments. The European Court of Justice in Luxembourg has ruled Thursday March 14, 2013, that harsh property repossession laws in Spain violate EU laws on consumer protection. Hundreds of thousands of evictions have taken place during Spain’s deep rec
/ AP

A police officer asks the Stop Evictions platform organizers and journalists to move further away from the Spanish parliament before a press conference in the street, in Madrid, Spain, Thursday March 14, 2013. The European Court of Justice in Luxembourg has ruled Thursday March 14, that harsh property repossession laws in Spain violate EU laws on consumer protection. Hundreds of thousands of evictions have taken place during Spain’s deep recession, but the watershed ruling said Spanish legis— AP

A police officer asks the Stop Evictions platform organizers and journalists to move further away from the Spanish parliament before a press conference in the street, in Madrid, Spain, Thursday March 14, 2013. The European Court of Justice in Luxembourg has ruled Thursday March 14, that harsh property repossession laws in Spain violate EU laws on consumer protection. Hundreds of thousands of evictions have taken place during Spain’s deep recession, but the watershed ruling said Spanish legis
/ AP

Protesters pose as they wear EU bags over their heads and nooses around their necks protest as the 'Stop Evictions platform' held a press conference in the street outside the Spanish parliament in Madrid, Spain, Thursday March 14, 2013. The European Court of Justice in Luxembourg has ruled Thursday March 14, 2013, that harsh property repossession laws in Spain violate EU laws on consumer protection. Hundreds of thousands of evictions have taken place during Spain’s deep recession, but the wa— AP

Protesters pose as they wear EU bags over their heads and nooses around their necks protest as the 'Stop Evictions platform' held a press conference in the street outside the Spanish parliament in Madrid, Spain, Thursday March 14, 2013. The European Court of Justice in Luxembourg has ruled Thursday March 14, 2013, that harsh property repossession laws in Spain violate EU laws on consumer protection. Hundreds of thousands of evictions have taken place during Spain’s deep recession, but the wa
/ AP

MADRID 
The European Court of Justice ruled Thursday that harsh property repossession laws in Spain that have led to hundreds of thousands of evictions during the country's deep recession violate EU laws on consumer protection, and activists said the decision could lead judges to halt thousands of bank foreclosure proceedings.

The watershed ruling said Spanish legislation infringes EU law as it does not allow courts to halt eviction orders on the basis of possible unfair terms in mortgage agreements.

The Luxembourg court ruling will almost certainly oblige Spain to amend its law and will also be taken into account by judges handling eviction cases.

More than 350,000 Spaniards have received eviction orders since 2008 because they were unable to make mortgage payments, though in most cases Spanish law required them to continue paying. At least five people have committed suicide in Spain since last fall because they had been evicted or were about to be forced from their repossessed homes.

The national outcry recently prompted the ruling Popular Party to make a last-minute change of stance and agree to debate mortgage default law changes in Parliament.

Ada Colau, a spokeswoman for the Stop Evictions platform that has worked doggedly to halt evictions across the country, welcomed the ruling and said it could be used by judges and lawyers for mortgage debtors to put thousands of current cases on hold.

"We are very happy with the news because it's a clear show of support for what we have been demanding and denouncing for the past four years, that the procedure is illegal and violates fundamental rights," Colau told Cadena SER radio.

She told reporters later that the ruling gives judges undisputed power to halt eviction proceedings when they believe mortgage holders signed abusive loan contracts drawn up by banks. Spanish judges had complained previously that they did not want to approve so many evictions but were powerless to prevent them because of the foreclosure laws.

"People are losing their patience, lives are literally at stake, there is an entire generation traumatized by the devastating effects of these procedures," she said. "What more has to happen before the government responds?"

Justice Minister Alberto Ruiz Gallardon said Spain would respect the ruling but provided no details how the government will respond.

Spain is in its second recession in just over three years and has 26 percent unemployment. Banks, meanwhile, have been blamed for the wave of mortgage foreclosures and homeowner evictions, as well as the suicides.

The collapse of the property market, which triggered the crisis in 2008, led to a fall in house prices but also saw a massive freeze in new purchasing and bank loans so that indebted house owners were unable to sell their properties and pay off their debt.

Thursday's ruling came after Barcelona Judge Jose Maria Fernandez Seijo sought the European tribunal's opinion on an eviction case taken by a bank against a Moroccan man who was unable to pay off the balance of a (EURO)138,000 mortgage. His contract allowed the bank to tack on an annual interest rate of 18.75 percent for unpaid amounts without notice, and to demand payment of the full balance of the mortgage after just one payment had been missed.