There’s some ugly stuff going on in the world of comment management software. I just can’t for the life of me figure out who is really the victim and who is the one throwing the mud.

A feud that’s been going on in the background between Disqus, LiveFyre, and their investors spilled out publicly in the comments on Fred Wilson’s blog today. Wilson was linking to an interview he did with MIT’s alumni magazine. He added at the end, “I hope you like it. But please come back here to comment. They use LiveFyre which I don’t approve of.”

This was not a surprise to me or — I’m guessing — any other blog that uses LiveFyre. Wilson has told me repeatedly he won’t comment on PandoDaily unless I switch commenting systems. In the comments, Jason Pontin, the Editor-in-Chief of the MIT Technology Review, asked him why he was so averse to LiveFyre. He gave his usual explanation. But in a new twist, LiveFyre’s founder and CEO Jordan Kretchmer came to his own defense.

See below:

Wilson doesn’t respond, rather he reiterates the stance below, in another awkward thread:

The whole back-and-forth was brought to my attention by LiveFyre’s investor John Frankel, with whom I already had a long conversation about the topic. He also Tweeted about it. I’ve asked Kretchmer directly, asking if there was any truth to what Wilson says and his response has been similar to the above. I’ve also asked Wilson for specific examples but never gotten more than the above.

Anyone’s mom want to get in on this fight too?

Kudos to Wilson for saying publicly what he says privately. I hate when VCs go around whispering in reporters’ ears but don’t say things on the record. And kudos for the consistency and for defending his investment. It’s rare that you see startups publicly talk shit about one another to this degree and even rarer that investors get in on it.

Wilson can be prickly and grumpy, but I don’t believe this is just because he’s an investor in Disqus. He is a broken record on this one, and I’ve never heard him be this vociferous about one of his companies being wronged. It’s clear Wilson believes there was dirty dealing.

But I can’t get anyone to give me an actual concrete example.

Then there’s my personal experience. As a customer I’ve been pitched by both companies twice — at TechCrunch and when we were starting PandoDaily. In the first case, Disqus won. In the latter case, LiveFyre did. These meetings were years apart and in neither meeting did I ever hear Kretchmer talk shit about Disqus.

In fact, when he lost TechCrunch’s comment system — a far bigger deal than little PandoDaily — he was gracious and understanding about it. LiveFyre was new and wasn’t ready for a site that big. I remember him just saying it was a shame for them that they weren’t further along. TechCrunch wound up uninstalling Disqus, which played into my decision to go with LiveFyre.

But really, the decision was left to Paul Carr, who vetted both for me. Those were the crazy early days and I was swamped blogging five times a day and recruiting talent. Paul said it was clear that LiveFyre had features Disqus didn’t at the time. (Although I understand the new version of Disqus is a big improvement, we were pitched on the old version.)

If that isn’t true, it isn’t because anyone misrepresented anything. It was because of how the two pitched. Paul was simply comparing what the two teams showed him. He says that LiveFyre hardly mentioned Disqus in its pitch, and when it did, it said the obligatory, “They’ve got some great stuff…” line used by competitors who are trying to act unthreatened by one another.

If LiveFyre is playing dirty, it’s great at hiding it from customers. And if true, it seems to me that Wilson has more than avenged his company in continually tarring LiveFyre’s tactics from a huge and influential megaphone.

At the end of the day, I wish the pettiness would end and both would work more on the problem. I’m still not thrilled with any of the comment management systems I’ve used. LiveFyre has a lot of great features, and our comments are better than they were before. But I find it annoying and clumsy to keep logging back in every few days to comment on my own site, and users complain about it as well.

Ultimately, there’s still too much of a trade-off: You can erect barriers to avoid anonymous trolls, but it creates friction that prevents people from commenting at all. There’s a lot more we want to do with comments and our developers have begged me to let them build a custom system that better fits our needs.

I’ve given up on getting to the bottom of who did what here. Let’s just end the nasty feud and make comments better.

Sarah Lacy is the founder and editor-in-chief of PandoDaily.
She is an award winning journalist and author of two critically acclaimed books, "Once You're Lucky, Twice You're Good: The Rebirth of Silicon Valley and the Rise of Web 2.0" (Gotham Books, May 2008) and "Brilliant, Crazy, Cocky: How the Top 1% of Entrepreneurs Profit from Global Chaos" (Wiley, February 2011).
She has been covering technology news for over 15 years, most recently as a senior editor for TechCrunch.

Facebook has introduced Scrapbook, a new feature that allows parents to share and collect images of their children in one place without requiring them to worry about tagging their kids’ face with each other’s names just to make sure they don’t miss what the other person has posted. [Source: Facebook]

“For all the clumsy rhetorical lip service [former Yahoo News head] Guy Vidra pays to The New Republic’s hallowed intellectual traditions, this is what his vision of a nimble digital news product finally translates into: a vaguely journalistic veneer strategically designed to conceal a rancid interior of ‘elevated’ advertising.”

Indian e-commerce company Flipkart is said to be raising $600 million in its latest bid to compete with Amazon. The company is also said to have garnered a higher valuation with this funding round — quite the feat, considering it was previously valued at around $11.5 billion. [Source: The Economic Times]

Here comes another unicorn: Sprinklr, a New York-based marketing company, has raised $46 million at a $1.17 billion valuation. The funds will be used to help the 700-person company expand its marketing platform. [Source: Fortune]

Curator, the tool Twitter created so the media could find and share tweets with its audience, is now available to the public. Because if there’s anything people wanted to see more of, it’s tweets randomly inserted into blog posts, television spots, and other forms of media. [Source: TechCrunch]

A court in France has decided not to ban Uber’s low-cost services until the country’s highest appeals court, or its supreme court, weigh in on the constitutionality of a new transport law. [Source: The Wall Street Journal]

Tinder is refocusing on its spam-fighting efforts in the wake of reports that movie studios are using the service to promote their movies, scammers are attempting to steal information via the app, and pranksters have created tools that trick heterosexual men into flirting with each other. [Source: The Verge]

Uber offers drivers whose accounts have been deactivated a choice: attend a class that requires them to pass an exam, or take a class that doesn’t. The latter has been informed by Uber employees, and the company has sent thousands of drivers to it, according to a report from BuzzFeed. Why is that a problem? Because Uber isn’t supposed to provide its drivers with formal training; doing so makes them bona fide employees, not independent contractors. [Source: BuzzFeed]

Flipboard users will now be able to collect articles and share them via private magazines visible only to members of certain groups. The feature is aimed at students working in the same class, companies sharing press coverage, and other groups that might want an easy way to share Web pages with each other without having to use public tools like Facebook or Twitter. [Source: Flipboard]