A member of

Newsfeed

Following the revelation that the Ministry of Defence had been misleading MPs and campaigners over the legal status of the UK's CHARM3 DU munitions, the UK Uranium Weapons Network has formally requested that the new review be made public.

Presentation by Dr Alexandra Miller of the US Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute (AFRRI) compiling the in vivo research by AFRRI and others into the biological effects of depleted uranium exposure.

Presentation by Dr Alexandra Miller of the US Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute (AFRRI) compiling the in vitro research by AFRRI and others into the biological effects of depleted uranium exposure.

SCHER was mandated to produce its Opinion following 2008’s landslide EP resolution on DU weapons, which called for an EU moratorium. SCHER was specifically requested by the Commission to consider the wealth of new data on DU’s genotoxicity and its implications for human health.

In response to local concerns over the environmental and health impact of depleted uranium testing at Bourges, France, the General Council of the Department of Cher has passed a resolution calling for greater transparency and a moratorium on testing.

LONDON: Campaigners have brought 2.3 tonnes of imitation 'depleted uranium (DU) dust' to the MoD's doorstep to remind them of their responsibility for contaminating areas of Iraq and Kuwait, during the 1991 and 2003 conflicts.

They are demanding the government take responsibility for contamination in the Gulf and cancel plans to extend the life of the UK's lastremaining DU round, CHARM3. The action is part of a global event markingthe International Day of Action on Depleted Uranium, and the UN International Day for Preventing the Exploitation of the Environment in War and Armed Conflict.

Along with the DU dust, campaigners delivered a letter to the MoD, signed by eight organisations including the Campaign Against Depleted Uranium, Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, Pax Christi, and Campaign Against the Arms Trade, and award winning film-maker and journalist John Pilger. The letter condemns the use of DU, asks the MoD to publicly recognise the risks from DU weapons and calls for a stop to the CHARM3 extension programme.

CHARM3 is the last UK munition to contain the increasingly controversial DU. When DU munitions hit hard targets an uncontrolled release of DU dust occurs. If inhaled or ingested, this dust has the potential to cause cancer. In areas that DU has been used, most notably in Iraq, doctors have reported a substantial increase in the rates of cancers and birth defects within the population [2].Aneaka Kellay, CADU campaigner said: "It is completely irresponsible for the MoD to use weapons that leave toxic remnants that put the health of civilians at risk, particularly given that these weapons would not beacceptable to use within the UK according to our own environmental protection regulations. I hope the new defence minister Philip Hammond sees sense and removes this toxic cold war relic from its arsenal."

DU is increasingly seen as a Cold War relic, which was developed out of fear of a Soviet tank invasion. International opposition to their use is continuing to grow. Campaigners argue that the Soviet threat is outdated and that radioactive and chemically toxic weapons are particularly inappropriate for contemporary humanitarian focused operations.

The propellant charge for the CHARM3 rounds will expire in 2013 and the MoD is developing a Life Extension Programme (LEP) [3] to enable their use beyond 2013. The MoD admits that DU weapons are not 'safe' butcontinue to incorrectly claim that DU poses no risk in order to justify its continued use.

It is looking increasingly likely that DU munitions will be subject to an international ban and the UK has an opportunity to take a leading role in this process.

Concerned MP's have submitted an Early Day Motion to parliament on the CHARM3 renewal [4]. Internationally DU weapons have been condemned by four resolutions in the European Parliament, including a landslide resolution in 2008, which called for a moratorium on DU's use and efforts toward a global ban. DU weapons have been the focus of three resolutions in the United Nations General Assembly, and the subject of domestic bans in Costa Rica and Belgium.