Case study for Valley eyes only,,, if your reading this information,,, you are not allowed to use it to better your team unless you join the Valley

Began - Potential - Ended

Ath 64 high 85 +21

Spd 77 high 90 +13

RB 35 ave 28 - 7

Def 70 high 77 + 7

Blk 14 low 17 + 3

LP 9 ave 3 - 6

PE 83 ave 93 +10

BH 90 ave 88 - 2

Pass 69 ave 70 + 1

WE 11 - 20 + 9

St 60 high 71 +11

Dur 86 ave 97 +11

in 4 seasons he avaraged 15.4 mins

44% FG 38% 3pt 65% ft 1.3 rb 1.3 ast 5.0 ppg

recieved exactly 0 awards and truely had an otherwise UN-noticible career

When recruited Reinsel said in his review Held would be a case study in "does WE matter?" I would say a resounding YES! This guy really never ever helped us out much, and I actually blame him in part for us sliding down to middle of the pack in the Valley. 2-3 seasons I actually never focused on a great guard because each season I thought would be the one he began to play up to his potential. Never happened. I believe a player like this can help a midle of the pack team... or one like Jr's got with Bradley who can't land the big fish... but for a decent program... they can be an anchor around the neck at times. Compared to Ferris, Ziff, and Esposito, who all came and went in Held's time at Creighton... they were studs by comparison.

reinsel, I really liked you review of your Top 15 recruits from 4 years ago. I think it shows that for the most part you do a good job of ranking the players. It would be interesting to also see how many (if any) players turned out to be pretty good in the league from that class that didn't even make the top 15 that year.