Social, environmental, and economic barriers are interconnected, and public-private partnerships (PPPs) are key to bringing together the knowledge, expertise, resources, and networks needed to tackle global challenges.

In this editorial series we’ll explore the role of business in supporting access to education and opportunities, and consider the best way to prepare a generation of leaders who understand the importance of sustainable development.

So, your company wants to reduce its landfill waste. Now what? As sustainability reaches top of mind for investors and customers, more companies are beginning to tackle waste in their supply chains in order to boost their green cred.

Integrated reporting and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals are gaining momentum. Join our half-day morning workshop, led by BrownFlynn, to explore the changing landscape for corporate responsibility and sustainability practitioners. [REGISTER HERE]

The largest annual gathering of EHS and Sustainability managers, directors and vice presidents. Celebrating its 25th year, NAEM's annual conference is dedicated to best practice-sharing for those developing and integrating strategic environmental, health, safety and sustainability programs within their companies. [REGISTER HERE]

The 10th anniversary Social Capital Markets conference, will convene leading impact investors, world-class entrepreneurs, and innovative cross-sector practitioners for three full days of networking and engaging content at the intersection of money and meaning. 3p Discount Code: "MP_TriplePundit" [REGISTER HERE]

An event series whose mission it is to bring together companies from around the world to discuss climate change and how they can work together to address it most impactfully. Now building sponsorship and registration. [INFO HERE]

For NI17 we’re creating an experience unlike any conference you’ve been to before. We’ll help you map out your Path to Purpose to turn your passion into a purposeful career by gaining tangible skills and actionable insights. [INFO HERE]

When MIT spends three years studying something, it’s probably worthwhile to pay close attention to the results. In this case the university is calling for a new framework for spurring innovation in how energy is produced, delivered and used.

Basically put, think regionally for solutions because the federal government is “structurally unable” to be the horn of plenty and innovation in this arena.

MIT found that while the world really needs innovation in energy technologies, it should to be kick-started through fundamental changes in energy research and delivery. A new system of policy and investment strategies will accelerate innovation in the U.S. to achieve the trifecta of meeting energy needs; reducing carbon emissions and easing insecurity over energy supply. The solution will not necessarily rest on big ticket government-funded Manhattan Project-type programs, but rather on smaller, more local and regional projects and investments.

The conclusions of the MIT study are described in a new book — Unlocking Energy Innovation (MIT Press, 2012) — by Richard Lester, the Japan Steel Industry Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering at MIT, and David Hart, a professor of public policy at George Mason University.

Lester says that without systematic, transformative changes, the US is unlikely to succeed either in averting the worst economic and environmental consequences of climate change or in achieving a secure, affordable and reliable energy supply.

“Innovation doesn’t just emerge out of thin air,” Lester continues. It requires a “productive ecosystem” that includes public and private research laboratories; small and large firms; financial intermediaries ranging from huge banks to individual “angel” investors; schools, community colleges and universities; and local, state and federal agencies. “We face a very big innovation challenge over the next few decades,” Lester says, “bigger than most people recognize. And the system as a whole isn’t close to being up to the task.”

In the book, Lester and Hart identify four stages in which an innovative technology becomes an established part of the energy infrastructure. Of those, the first stage — the discovery of new technological options — and the final stage — fine-tuning of technologies already in commercial use — are relatively well-managed, though both will need more investment.

The two middle stages are less well managed, they continue. “These stages, spanning what is often referred to as ‘the valley of death,’ include the development of prototypes to demonstrate viability in the marketplace and the initial implementation of the first full-scale systems by early adopters in the marketplace.” These intermediate stages are costly and pose high investment risks, and even “a modest carbon price will do little to accelerate them.”

Several steps are needed to encourage energy innovation, according to the book: competition (while leaving space for new market entrants), making rigorous and timely selections of promising concepts, and matching the scale of the system to the scale of the need. “The current system satisfies none of these,” Lester says.

Since coal and natural gas represent about 70 percent of all electricity generation in the US, finding cost-effective ways of replacing those fuels and mitigating their emissions are critical, the book says.

One specific idea the team advocates is a regional approach to managing and financing those two intermediate stages of innovation.

While the rest of the world watches the gridlock in Washington, innovation and the new energy grid suffers, so the case for regionalization on energy becomes more compelling—and necessary.