Yesterday, National Journal's Michael Catalini gave a rather depressing look at the prospects so far for Republicans in Minnesota's 2014 Senate race, when Al Franken will defend his seat for the first time --- and so far, no one has volunteered to challenge him. Norm Coleman, who lost the seat by 312 votes in 2008 after a months-long recount and challenge, has firmly declared himself uninterested in another election:

After winning election by the narrowest of margins in 2008, Sen. Al Franken looked like one of the GOPs most inviting Senate targets in 2014. But instead, the party is facing the reality that Franken is proving to be a much more resilient opponent than expected, and his uncontroversial first term is raising doubts about whether Republicans can even recruit a first-tier candidate against the former Saturday Night Live funnyman.

"You can't play handball in an open field. At this point there's been no candidate," said former GOP Sen. Norm Coleman, who lost to Franken in the 2008 race. “He’s been pretty much invisible. In that sense he hasn’t created a lot of enemies. I don’t know if that’s his strategy, but it’s a pretty good strategy if it is.

The list of potential, formidable candidates is short. Coleman, in an interview with National Journal, categorically said he wasnt going to run for the Senate in 2014, denying the GOP one of its best-known possible challengers. Rep. Erik Paulsen, a popular House member from the Twin Cities suburbs, telegraphed his own hesitance about jumping into the Senate race on a local radio show. Coleman touted Rep. John Kline, another swing-district Republican, but he has passed up previous statewide bids in favor of building up tenure in the House. And Rep. Michele Bachmann, who would be formidable in a primary, would be the Democrats dream challenger, given her high unfavorables even back home. She barely won re-election in a solidly-Republican House district in 2012.

Whats clear is that Minnesota Republicans are wary of jumping head first into the contest, despite the obvious opportunities against Franken.

In order to understand this, one has to understand the ground game of the state GOP, which has been a total disaster until recently. The state organization more or less collapsed financially in 2011, after having succeeded in the midterms in taking control of the legislature but losing all the statewide constitutional offices. In the 2012 cycle, Ron Paul followers won key offices in local party structures, many of whom have failed to engage much afterward. The state GOP has worked hard over the past year to put its house in order, but it still has a lot of work to do to catch up to the DFL, and not too much time in which to do it.

Furthermore, the experience of running against Amy Klobuchar in 2012 will probably cool most potential Republican candidates from tossing their hats in the ring against Franken. Klobuchar raised prodigious amounts of money and buried Kurt Bills by more than 2-1 in the general election. That margin went far beyond Barack Obama’s support in the state, even though Klobuchar — like Franken — has kept a very low profile in Washington, mainly notable only for following Obama’s lead in the Senate. Franken has succeeded in following Klobuchar’s strategy, and unlike Coleman, I am certain that it’s deliberate.

However, there are reasons to hope for a better outcome in 2014. First, Obama won’t be on the ticket, although all of the state’s constitutional offices will be. Second-term midterms tend to be tough on presidents, and unless hiring and economic activity pick up soon, that will almost certainly be the case for Obama. Second, the more onerous provisions of ObamaCare will be in effect by that time, especially the medical-device taxes that will hammer Minnesota businesses. Franken and Klobuchar have tried to reverse them, but they voted to impose them in the first place. Hopefully by that time the state GOP will have righted their own organizational ship and can focus on producing better candidates and ground game efforts.

Still, unless Franken makes a fool out of himself, he’s going to have the advantage, especially against less-well-known Republicans. The best chance for beating Franken in 2014 may be the last Republican to win a state-wide election in Minnesota — Tim Pawlenty. He built the kind of national reach he’d need to match Franken’s fundraising (Frabnken already has $1.3 million COH), and Republicans will need to nationalize this race to make up for the shortcomings of the state Republican organization. He’s also laying low at the moment, but that may be a deliberate strategy, too.

Knowing Franken cheated (finding uncounted ballots in boxes in someone’s car trunk??????) his way into the seat in 2008 must be a bit daunting to anyone thinking about putting boatloads of time, energy and money into a challenge. If it could be assured there would be a clean election, I suspect Republicans/Conservatives would be lining up to run for that seat!

The election’s two years off. Coleman is worhtless anyway and would have lost. Pawlenty, Bachmann, one of the new legislators could be the potenial nominee. Kurt Bills, who just lost to Klobuchar could run again. Franken is no heavyweight. Minnesota has very strange voting patterns. They elected Humphrey and Mondale to be sure, but they also elected Rudy Boschwicz.

Well....that was the first name that popped into my head. What about Pawlenty? That’s the problem.....these guys are too busy running for president.....instead of concentrating on taking out these lib senators. My focus in 2014 will be on the US Senate. If write any checks next year it will to US Senate candidates.

AF is such a certified clown and public embarrassment nobody in Minn wants to bring attention to him even if it means he wins reelection...

...as long as he wins like he has served—nobody knows he exists and we don't want anybody to know that he does... ...and we certainly don't wish for anybody to know he existed here...

...he is the crazy uncle in the closet—vote with Reid, speechify sometimes, tell everyone something they will give five minutes attention like “Hey I am here and I matter!” then let the toad retreat to his slime irrelevance untill Minn gets the sense God gives a Banana Slug.

13
posted on 01/10/2013 10:58:46 AM PST
by Happy Rain
("Banning guns over Adam Lanza would be like banning speech over Bill Maher.")

OK the best scenario I can come up with is that we are just going to wait for the revolution and we plan on killing all the traitors that’s why we are not wasting time running someone against this SNLPOS.

I don’t think Rush would want to move from FL to MN. I don’t think Rush wants to give up his day time job. MN is the bluest of blue states. It has not voted for a GOP presidential candidate since 1972. Rush wouldn’t have a prayer there even if he wanted to move from from FL to MN and give up just about the best job one could ever ask for.

... give up just about the best job one could ever ask for.That's my point, exactly. He's had the "best job" of talking a good game for over 20 years. It's now time to put down the mike and DO something besides talk.

Between the voter fraud, the lawyers and the idiot so-called Republican voters who thought it more moral to vote "third party" than for Coleman, why would anyone want to run? It would take cooperation with all Republican factions and there's no evidence they would all put their muscle behind any Republican.

This is why we have Franken and this is why we have Obamacare. Thanks a lot.

You got that right, Pawlenty doesn't excite me, either but compared to Franken, he's very exciting. We must pledge to do everything to get behind all Republican candidates. If MN can't reign in that "third party" faction, I wouldn't bother with it, either.

These "third party" factions are destroying us. If it weren't for those 3000 people in MN, we wouldn't have Obama care. and perhaps if those moronic "third party" candidates had not pitched their hissy fit and voted against Romney, we may have had a different outcome, if we would get serious about voter fraud. We must use all strategies to root out this evil of liberalism.

OK......what if Rush carpetbagged up to MN......do you honestly think he would have a snowball’s chance in hell....given Rush’s politics.....given MN’s ultra liberal politics?

Moreover, should Rush ever decide to run for public office (which I doubt he ever will) his personal life would come under scrutiny again and I don’t think he needs or wants that. Rush is doing a fine job where he is now.

Allen West should run for Congress again and reclaim his FL congressional seat which was apparently stolen from him with usual Dem hijinks and foul play. As with Rush, he would be viewed as a carpetbagger in MN and also probably way too conservative for that ultra blue state. Aren’t there any local MN Republicans who could run against Al Franken?

What's stopping Rush from running in a state where he has an even chance of winning? And Rush's personal life has been given a DemoRat anal exam a thousand times. WTF has he got to worry about?And it's not just Rush - it's all the talkers - that's all they do is talk.

A conservative talk show has no chance to win an ultra-left state like MN——the ONLY state RR never carried——last time state voted for gop presidential candidate was 1972.

Not to say a GOP candidate cannot win a senate seat there. But their best chance is to find a LOCAL candidate familiar with state and local issues. Rush isn’t going to do it and neither is Allen West. Trust me.

I know, and agreed with the sentiment then, even more now (that the government is a joke and he is a clown). Problem is: the inmates have been running the asylum for a long time, they are just boastful about it now and the general public is low information politically.

If it wasn’t evident in my original response, I was being kind of tongue-in-cheek...

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.