7 Introduction The Department of Education (DOE) is proposing a $12.0 billion capital plan for FY Through this plan, we will invest in New York City s future, continuing to create the school buildings and facilities that the City s children need and deserve. This plan will help us to create more than 32,500 seats in areas of current overcrowding and projected enrollment growth and will continue to invest in our infrastructure, thereby providing the framework for enhanced educational services and better facilities for the City s more than one million school children and the teachers and staff who serve them. In this era of constrained finances, needs must be prioritized to ensure the most critical issues are addressed first. The DOE is faced with both a growing student population in pockets of districts and an aging infrastructure. The DOE and the School Construction Authority (SCA) annually undertake a comprehensive assessment of alternatives to address the need to balance the City s economic conditions with the projected demand for public school education. Realignment strategies such as increasing the utilization of existing facilities, changing grade configurations of schools, and adjustments to local school zones are some of the tools to achieve the most efficient use of our existing buildings. The above strategies and construction of new facilities are designed to address the most critical existing and anticipated capacity needs with priority given to existing overcrowding at the neighborhood or district level. The DOE also undertakes an annual assessment of the condition of our existing buildings. This evaluation allows for the prioritization of projects for our current inventory in order to provide safe and comfortable learning environments. The FY 2019 Capital Plan features the following proposed investments: $3.91 billion for Capacity. The Capacity Program includes three elements. They are: o $3.30 billion for New Capacity, adding more than 32,500 new seats in an estimated 57 buildings will help us alleviate existing over-crowding, respond to ongoing pockets of growth in some neighborhoods, and enable us to remove all temporary classroom units (TCUs). In addition, the DOE has secured the opportunity to include new public school facilities across the City within several major, predominantly residential development projects undertaken by private developers in areas of existing or projected overcrowding. o $400 million for Facility Replacement Program provides funding for replacing some facilities whose leases will expire during this Plan. In some instances, a landlord may refuse to renew a lease. And in other instances, we may choose to relocate from a leased site which we have determined is not satisfactory for instruction and improvement cannot be made. Funds in this category cover the costs to construct a new building or to build out a new leased location. 7

8 o $210 million for Charter and Partnership Program The interest generated by the Charter and Partnership program in the FY and FY Plans demonstrates the desire of private partners to establish relationships with the DOE to meet the demand for new school facility development and high quality educational options. Partners provide valuable private-sector resources to support the construction of buildings supporting public school students. DOE will continue exploring ways to extend the successes created through the Charter and Partnership Program by aligning charter and partnership school development to areas of capacity need and community interest, where possible. $4.61 billion for Capital Investment. The Capital Investment portion of this Plan includes two main categories: o $3.31 billion for the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which includes exterior and interior building upgrades and other necessary capital repairs to our buildings. o $1.30 billion for Children First Initiatives is designed to enhance the educational opportunities for our children. This category includes funding to support technology enhancements, realignment of existing facilities to better suit instructional needs, bathroom upgrades, physical fitness projects, science labs, accessibility and other necessary improvements. $3.48 billion for Mandated Programs. This program provides funding in order to meet requirements by local law, City agency mandates and other required elements such as remediation and building code compliance projects, insurance, and emergencies. Under this program, all remaining light fixtures containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in school buildings will be replaced. In addition, funding is allocated to continue boiler conversions as required by the NYC Department of Environmental Protection s (DEP) regulation to phase out the use of Number 4 oil by FINANCING THE PLAN: Funding for the proposed Plan is structured in the same manner as the FY Capital Plan. Approximately half of the required funding is provided by the City and the other half is being provided by New York State. Additional resources will be provided through partnerships, federal grants, elected officials and private contributions. PUBLIC REVIEW: The proposed FY 2019 Capital Plan will continue the public input process implemented under the FY Plan and continued under the FY Plan. Under this process, a draft plan is released in November. The public review period extends from November to January, during which time the DOE/SCA meets with Community Education Councils (CEC), Community Boards, Council Borough Delegations and other elected officials. An update incorporating the results of the meetings is released in February. The Panel for Education Policy reviews the Plan and if approved, it is forwarded to the Mayor and the City 8

9 Council for review and approval as part of the City s annual budget adoption process. This allows for increased transparency and results in expanded review and dialogue. Furthermore, annual updates to the Plan are provided through proposed Amendments. Actual costs and completion dates for finished projects, changes to schedules and estimates for on-going projects, and potential modifications to capacity needs as a result of constantly evolving demographics are reflected in these annual updates. Proposed Amendments are subject to the same public review and City Council adoption. FY Capital Plan Summary The FY Capital Plan, first adopted in June 2009, provided $11.3 billion in funding for two major categories: Capacity and Capital Investment. The Plan was reviewed and updated annually to reflect the latest information on project budgets, schedules and status. Each amendment underwent an extensive public review process prior to approval by the City Council. As the FY Plan nears completion, we are seeing the impact our efforts had on the educational environment of our school children. Accomplishments include: 27,689 new capacity seats funded under this Plan have been completed or will start construction by the end of FY An additional 4,700 replacement seats are in process or have been created under this Plan. These seats replace seats lost primarily through expiring leases that were not renewed. Over 4,800 seats have been funded through the Charter and Partnership Program. These include: o KIPP High School o Dream Charter School/Harlem RBI o ICAHN Charter Schools 4 & 5 o Harlem Children s Zone Promise Academy o Pave Academy Charter School o Columbia Secondary School o Teacher s College Community School o Challenge Prep All school buildings and their classrooms will have broadband connectivity and wireless access by the end of FY existing schools were upgraded to provide full program accessibility. An additional two existing schools were upgraded to be made partially accessible. In the last four fiscal years, we have started construction of approximately 1,600 capital improvements in our existing buildings. 9

10 New Capacity Status: Between September 2010 and September 2013, 10,001 seats funded by the FY Plan have become available in schools across all five boroughs. In the next four years more than 17,688 additional seats will be made available. o September 2014: 3,913 o September : 7,314 o September : 6,113 o September 2017: 348 Given the time it takes to design and complete school buildings, many of the capacity projects created by the FY Capital Plan will open over the next several years. The table below provides the geographic details of the seats coming on line in the next few years: District Sept Sept. Sept. Sept Total Manhattan ,019 1,537 Bronx ,332 1,332 Brooklyn , , Queens 24 1,048 1,582 1,837 4, , , ,405 Staten Island Total 3,913 7,314 6, ,688 10

11 Under the FY Plan, we were able to identify sites for and start construction of 27,689 new capacity seats. In addition, 6,770 seats, inclusive of 2,526 seats that were funded for design only, have been rolled over to the FY proposed Capital Plan. The following chart summarizes the New Capacity Program under the FY Plan: FY Capital Plan Status of New Capacity Seats District February 2013 Total Funded Seats Completed/ Started Construction in FY Plan Not Started Construction in FY Plan 2 3,902 2, , ,176 1, ,233 1, ,372 2, , ,339 5, * 1,183 1, ,103 1, * 3,717 3, ,704 1, K 1,202 1, Q 2,283 1, Number of Rollover Seats # TOTAL 34,819 27,689 7,324 6,770 *Districts contain projects with higher number of seats than originally planned as a result of available space that allowed more seats to be built. # Includes 2,526 seats funded for design only in the FY Capital Plan. Removes 554 seats (98 seats in District 2 and 456 seats in District 22) previously funded but no longer required based on updated projections. Structure of the FY 2019 Capital Plan The FY 2019 Capital Plan enhances the structure of the FY Capital Plan by combining all code, mandate and regulation related programs under a new top level category: Mandated Programs. Therefore, there are now three major categories: Capacity, Capital Investment and Mandated Programs. Capacity includes all initiatives that create new school 11

12 facilities, Capital Investment includes all programs undertaken to improve and upgrade existing facilities and Mandated includes all initiatives to comply with new mandates and existing, local laws and codes as well as prior plan completion costs, wrap up insurance and emergencies. As in the FY Plan, the proposed new Capacity projects are identified for all five years. Capital Investment projects that renovate existing buildings, however, are identified only for the first two years of the plan (FY and FY), with funding allocations for the remaining three years. Each annual plan amendment will identify individual projects for the two succeeding years. The annual amendment process allows the DOE to reassess priorities and to take into account shifts in enrollments, variations in housing growth, changes in building conditions, new educational initiatives, adjustments in the construction marketplace, and incorporates any impact from financial changes implemented by the City or State. This annual review has proven to be the most effective way to make the Capital Plan a living, working document that, within budgetary constraints, keeps pace with the needs of the educational system. Each section has a summary table showing the proposed funding for each category of the Plan. Capacity The Capacity category includes all programmatic elements related to creating, expanding or replacing school buildings, or capacity in our school system. Major elements of the Capacity category in this Plan include accommodating residual overcrowding and projected enrollment growth at the neighborhood level within districts within identified need. Given the proposed funding constraints, the DOE has prioritized the reduction of existing pockets of overcrowding. The analysis for this Plan includes a multi-dimensional review and analysis of localized capacity and enrollment patterns within each district. The result is a set of recommendations for each district that takes into account the needs within each area of the district within funding limitations. These recommendations will be reviewed annually based on updated enrollment projections, capacity changes and housing information. This New Capacity Program proposes a $3.30 billion investment for an estimated 57 buildings adding 32,560 seats Citywide. The program includes: 29 small Primary school buildings, Grades Pre-Kindergarten 5 23 larger buildings which can be flexibly programmed for Elementary, Middle or Pre- Kindergarten 8 grade schools Four Intermediate/High school buildings to serve Secondary or High Schools One PS/IS building with 806 seats will be funded for design in this plan and construction in the next plan. This new capacity coupled with strategies to align current facilities with enrollment needs will assist the DOE in: Reducing localized overcrowding within districts Enabling removal of all TCUs 12

13 Continuing the practice initiated under the FY Plan, the grade structure for the larger facilities to be built will provide the flexibility to program spaces for grades PreK through 8 instruction. The actual grades to be served can be configured based on the specific needs of the community, which could be PreK-5, PreK-8, or middle school. In order to meet the growing demand, and consistent with the goal of serving special education students in the least restrictive, appropriate setting, new PS and larger PS/IS facilities will continue to include special education facilities designed to serve special education students. The Capacity category also includes the Charter and Partnership Program ($210 million), at the same level of funding allocated under the FY Capital Plan. This program will extend the reach of our capacity budget by leveraging private funding through which expanded educational opportunities can be made available to our children. The final element of our Capacity category, the Facility Replacement Program ($400 million) continues the initiative begun under the FY Plan to provide replacement sites for those schools or administrative facilities that must vacate their current locations. It is anticipated that approximately 4,000 seats may have to be replaced under this Plan. Capital Investment The Capital Investment category ($4.61 billion) includes the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) ($3.31 billion) and Children First Initiatives ($1.30 billion). CIP projects cover infrastructure work in our existing buildings. Our current inventory of facilities is mainly comprised of older assets and includes over 170 buildings that are at least 100 years old. The needs identified under this Plan are based on several factors, including the annual Building Condition Assessment Survey which provides an evaluation of the condition of our building systems. We use this evaluation in conjunction with recommendations from facility personnel, school administration and the community in developing the projects to be included in this Capital Plan. We will continue to maintain our focus on ensuring that buildings are watertight and safe. Children First Initiatives ($1.30 billion) continue the work from the FY Plan to upgrade instruction spaces in existing buildings. The two main programs in this category are: Facility Enhancements and Technology. Facility Enhancements support restructuring for new schools, safety and security, and science lab upgrades. In addition, this category includes upgraded physical fitness spaces, expanded accessibility in schools and upgrades for libraries and auditoriums. The Facility Enhancement Program also provides funding for new initiatives such as serving lines, cafeteria and bathroom upgrades. The DOE plans to continue developing and expanding its technology infrastructure in school buildings to provide all its students and educators with the necessary tools for academic achievements and professional success in today s environment. When this Capital Plan begins in July 1, 2014, it is anticipated that all DOE school buildings will have high bandwidth 13

14 connectivity. This is a significant transformation for our buildings compared to six years ago when less than 20 percent of buildings had high bandwidth connectivity. This new capital plan will allow the DOE to build on the success and investments of prior capital plans to ensure that schools will be able to continue to meet new technological challenges in the coming years, especially the ability to ensure equitable access for all students and educators. Mandated Programs The Mandated Programs category ($3.48 billion) includes funding for non-discretionary elements such as remediation/code compliance work, prior plan completion costs, emergency work, building condition assessments (mandated by SED), and contractor insurance. This category now also includes funding for projects required by local law or City agency mandates. In April 2011, the City finalized a DEP rule that phases out the use of two highly polluting forms of heating oil Number 6 oil and Number 4 oil. The phase out of Number 6 oil is required by mid-. Phase out of Number 4 oil is mandated by The DOE is currently modifying all existing boilers burning Number 6 oil. This will allow us to meet the deadline. In this proposed Plan, we have allocated $750 million to convert boilers at approximately 125 of 380 buildings currently using Number 4 oil. Eliminating the use of heavy oils and transitioning to the cleanest fuels will comply with this mandate. This level of spending paces these boiler conversions evenly across the Capital Plans between now and the 2030 mandate. In May 2013, the City entered into an agreement to replace all PCB containing light fixtures by the end of December, rather than by 2021 as originally envisioned. The anticipated total cost of this program, since its inception, will be approximately $1 billion. The DOE is allocating $480 million to complete the replacement of these lighting fixtures. We anticipate that by the time the FY 2019 Capital Plan begins, we will need to replace T-12 light fixtures at approximately 300 remaining buildings. 14

15 15 CAPACITY

16 16

17 Capacity Introduction Summary Five-Year Proposal $3,911.0 mm The Capacity Category encompasses all aspects of creating new seats necessary to provide for the expansion of our system and the replacement of seats no longer available. This new capacity provides the infrastructure necessary to continue advancing our goals of equity, access and achievement. In doing this, the City will meet local enrollment demands, strategically grow facilities sufficiently to meet future demand, and eliminate our reliance on temporary facilities. Although Citywide public school enrollment is projected to only slightly increase, localized growth may be higher in some areas. This growth, combined with existing overcrowded areas, requires new construction to meet capacity needs in certain areas of the City. As a result, through the new Capacity Program, approximately 28,100 new seats will be created in areas within districts that have or are projected to experience overcrowding in the next five years in the absence of the additional capacity. During the prior two Capital Plans, the DOE also secured the opportunity to include new public school facilities across the City within several major, predominantly residential development projects undertaken by private developers in areas of existing or projected overcrowding. The partnerships with these developers would allow the DOE to provide new school facilities in areas of need with contributions of land or space by those developers. Therefore, over 4,400 seats within developments projected to begin during this Five-Year Plan are funded for design or design and construction including: Hudson Square Rezoning and Hudson Yards in Manhattan; Crotona Park East/West Farms Rezoning in the Bronx; Atlantic Yards, Greenpoint Landing and Domino Redevelopment in Brooklyn; and, Halletts Point Rezoning in Queens. Finally, the DOE will continue to monitor conditions at the NYU Core development, as well as in the vicinity of the City s Seward Park Mixed-Use Redevelopment Project, where City-owned land has been reserved for future school construction should it be determined necessary. The inclusion and schedule of each of these developer projects in the Plan is contingent upon the advancement of each of the developments. The instructional models for new buildings continue to be flexible to ensure that the appropriate grade configurations that best meet the needs of the surrounding communities can be easily accommodated now and in the future. And, as is standard practice, the schools and programs to 17

18 inhabit these facilities will be determined on the basis of extensive discussions with community stakeholders. Details regarding the need for new schools (e.g., demographic and new housing projections) and the ability to provide input can be found at: The DOE will continue to employ, wherever possible, the strategies undertaken in the prior two Capital Plans to create new capacity. These strategies were designed to maximize our resources and included revitalization of the Education Construction Fund (ECF), expansion of leasing as a means to build seats in districts and neighborhoods where finding new construction sites has proven to be difficult and developing public/private partnerships for new schools and upgrades to existing school facilities. In addition, the DOE will continue to work closely with other City agencies to ensure that major residential developments provide appropriate resources to assist in mitigating the impact created by these projects. Consistent with the FY Plan, this Plan estimates two-thirds of new capacity will be achieved through construction of new buildings or additions and the remaining third through leased facilities. As part of the Capacity Program, the DOE has allocated $210 million, specifically for the support and development of charter public schools and DOE public new small schools opened in partnership with outside organizations. The Charter and Partnership Schools allocation supports targeted capital investments in areas of distinct educational need, and the investments are executed in partnership with outside organizations who share the DOE s goals for improved school leadership, empowerment and accountability. Funding under the Replacement Program of the Capacity Category, allows us to convert currently leased seats to permanent capacity by replacing expiring leases with new construction or build out of new leased location. We estimate that this category will allow for the replacement of approximately 4,000 seats. These sites will be included in the Plan as they are identified. New Capacity Program Summary Five-Year Proposal $3,301.0 mm The creation of additional capacity is directly connected with the goals of increasing student achievement, access and equity. In the service of these goals, the DOE has determined prospective investments by gathering the best possible information about capacity needs in local communities and the available resources in the system to meet those needs. 18

19 This process starts with understanding challenges that can be solved through structural and systems solutions. Such challenges might include school quality, current learning conditions such as overcrowding, patterns of student enrollment, and unmet demand for particular types of schools or programs within schools. The City will seek solutions to these challenges first, through the resources that already exist within the DOE. Thus, where the DOE proposes future investment in this Plan, it does so having assessed its ability to change structures, and having concluded that capital investment is the optimal perhaps only means by which to address current or future needs. There are areas where growth is projected to continue or where overenrollment persists. These are local conditions, requiring truly local analysis. In creating this plan, therefore, the DOE has analyzed current capacity figures, capacity scheduled to become available over the next several years, long-term enrollment and housing projections. The DOE further assessed spaces below maximum utilization building by building to determine the viability of plans to change the instructional usage or enrollment constraints for those spaces. Such analysis yields understanding of both problems such as over-enrollment or lack of student choice and solutions; be that solution a capital investment or the repurposing of current resources. This type of local analysis and planning is ongoing and will be continually responsive to local enrollment and facilities conditions, just as the capital plan is amended annually. The DOE s capacity analysis has identified an overall need of approximately 49,000 seats Citywide. However, because of funding limitations, only 32,560 seats are funded in this Plan, with 31,754 seats for design and construction and 806 seats for design only during this Plan. This includes seats that were funded but not started in the prior plan. The chart below identifies the capacity currently funded in the Plan and the additional need by district for elementary and middle schools and by borough for high schools. The chart also includes the status of the seats already in process. 19

THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK Hon. Melissa Mark-Viverito Speaker of the Council Hon. Daniel Dromm Chair, Committee on Education Report on the Fiscal 2017 Preliminary Budget and the Fiscal 2016 Preliminary

Why does the renovation and expansion of an EXISTING SCHOOL sometimes cost about the SAME or MORE than the construction of a NEW SCHOOL? 1. BASIC FACTS: The current Abington High School building is 111,831

1.0 VISION The Standard: The MFP should provide a clear, inspiring vision for the District s public facilities that will be broadly acceptable to its citizens. The plan must build confidence in DCPS ability

Public Health H Insurance I ParP articipation in the Community Districts D of New N York k CityC New York City Mayor s Office of Health Insurance Access Marjorie Cadogan, Executive Director 51 Chambers

Hon. Melissa Mark-Viverito Speaker of the Council Hon. Julissa Ferreras Chair, Committee on Finance Hon. Daniel R. Garodnick Chair, Committee on Economic Development The Council of the City of New York

A NETWORK OF YOUTH OPPORTUNITY CENTERS (Across all five Boroughs) Background Approximately one-third of the young adults who live in New York City s predominantly low-income communities, like Mott Haven

DISTRICT/CHARTER COLLABORATION COMPACT A Collaboration to Transform Education in New York City Whereas the New York City Department of Education ( NYC DOE ) and the undersigned public charter schools in

FY2014 Budget Support Act Section 9014 District of Columbia Public Library Introduction The DC Public Library s Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Library, located at 901 G Street, NW, needs a major renovation

GB3 Office of the President TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: 1 For Meeting of July 21, 2015 DISCUSSION ITEM PRELIMINARY PLANS FUNDING, MISSION BAY EAST CAMPUS PHASE 1 (BLOCK 33) BUILDING,

Schools Goals The City will: Provide adequate public facilities and services for all services which the City provides. Provide excellent educational services that exceed state standards. Ensure that new

Focus Fund 30020 supports the long term needs of the County s capital assets to maximize the life of County facilities, avoid their obsolescence, and provide for planned repairs, improvements and restorations

Office of the Comptroller Access to the Internet is the fourth utility of the modern age as central to our daily lives as electricity, gas, and water. And yet, for millions of New Yorkers, high-speed internet

An Update on the Transformation Plan, School Finances, and the Vision for Education Facilities Plan for 21 st Century Learning Presentation to the Citizens of Sandusky, Ohio Tuesday, January 19, 2016 Wednesday,

For the Facilities Master Plan March 4, 2015 1 Introduction This has been prepared to describe a proposed process to be implemented in order to develop comprehensive Facility Master Plans for all schools

Byron Area Schools Frequently Asked Questions Bond Proposal How did this come about? For several years the Byron Area Schools Board of Education has included upgrading facilities as one of the district

Dell Connected Learning for Schools Transforming Education for the Digital Age This document was created to provide Dell s point of view for primary and secondary schools and contains the following sections:

SCOPING GUIDELINES 1.0 GENERAL GUIDELINES 2.0 BUILDING ENVELOPE SCOPING GUIDELINES 3.0 CATEGORIES AND COMPONENTS: The Flood Elimination/Below Grade Capital Category may include some or all of the following

MEASURE G-2010 EXHIBIT B FULL TEXT BALLOT PROPOSITION OF THE SAN JOSE EVERGREEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOND MEASURE ELECTION NOVEMBER 2, 2010 To better prepare San Jose City College/ Evergreen Valley

Nashville- Davidson County Collaboration Compact: A collaboration to transform education in Nashville, TN Charter schools are public schools, and the service they provide should be celebrated as completely

Springfield Township Board of Education March 10, 2015 Referendum Questions and Answers (updated 2/19/2015) What is a referendum? New Jersey school districts hold public referendum votes to seek approval

Capital Improvement Programming INTRODUCTION Capital improvement programming is a guide toward the efficient and effective provision of public facilities. Programming capital facilities over time can promote

FY09 PERFORMANCE PLAN MISSION Support the District Government and residents through strategic real estate management, construction and facilities management. SUMMARY OF SERVICES The (OPM) has primary responsibility

BEFORE THE PHILADELPHIA WATER, SEWER AND STORMWATER RATE BOARD Re Application of the Philadelphia Water Department for Increased Rates and Related Charges Fiscal Years 2017-2018 DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEPHEN

NYC Clean Heat Workshop Connections to Technical and Financial Assistance November 14, 2012 PlaNYC: A Greener Greater New York Air Quality Achieve the cleanest air of any big U.S. city Energy Reduce energy

A Guide to Green Roofs on Existing School Buildings What is a Green Roof? What does it do? Green Roofs can mean different things. It can include vegetative plantings, solar thermal installations, solar

RENEWING CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION IN COLORADO A summary of the Colorado State Plan for Implementation of the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 Prepared by the Colorado Community

FUNDING NOTE: Opportunities to Coordinate 21st Community Learning Centers Funding with the Child Care and Development Fund January 2011 The Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) administered by the Office

2013-2016 Three Year District Technology Plan Pasco School District #1 July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2016 Development History August 2012 November 2012 December 2012 December 2012 February 2013 March 2013 April

Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District STRATEGIC PLAN 2013-2015 The Strategic Plan identifies the District s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, and provides direction and focus to help

2015 Legislative Positions Adopted by the Delegate Assembly In Savannah, Georgia, on June 13, 2014 GSBA represents the collective resolve of our members, the 180 elected boards of education. These legislative

Guide to Buying Guide to Buying congratulations! This is the first step to walking into your very own home. citi habitats works to make the buying experience enjoyable. This guide will help you navigate

Guidance on Charter School Formal Complaints Office of School Design & Charter Partnerships Introduction Charter school formal complaints Charter schools are publicly funded schools that are open to all

Building Bridges: The Link Between Strategic Planning and Budgeting Dr. Sona K. Andrews Vice Chancellor for Academic Strategies Oregon University System Stacy Pearson Vice President for Finance and Administration

State of Montana Office Of Public Instruction IT Strategic Plan 2014 1. Executive Summary 1 The IT Division has experienced dramatic growth of its supported environment in the past three to four years.

Office of Property Management OPM (AM) MISSION Support the District Government through building operations, real estate management and capital construction. SUMMARY OF SERVICES The Office of Property Management

Chapter Three: Challenges and Opportunities The preparation of Orange County Community College s Periodic Review Report occurs at a time when the College and New York State are experiencing an economic

6. Education The Executive Budget reflects the Governor s commitment to improving student outcomes by providing a $1.1 billion increase in aid (4.8 percent) and conditioning it on the implementation of

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Funding Highlights: Provides $77.4 billion. The Budget includes a significant increase for K-12 education, while making tough choices to put the Pell Grant program on a sustainable

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Funding Highlights: Provides $77.4 billion. The Budget includes a significant increase for K-12 education, while making tough choices to put the Pell Grant program on a sustainable

Ames Middle School 1920 N Hamlin Ave 1997 Completed The scope of this project is to construct a new school $16,913,379 2014 Construction The intent of this project is to expand existing Ames middle school

1 UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITIES: SERVICES THAT HELP POOR CHILDREN SUCCEED IN THE CLASSROOM Part 7: Schools As Community Hubs for Students and Families By Soumya Bhat and Jenny Reed Elementary and secondary schools

Reality Check: The Impact of Co-location on a Sample of Schools An Issue Brief by the February 2010 Reality Check: The Impact of Co-location on a Sample of Schools Chancellor Klein has often said his goal

Information Technology and Communications City Council City Manager I INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNICATIONS I '""""'"'"1:11 commimill!itlerrs: Mission Statement To establish strategies, policies and

Youth Disconnection in New York City A New York metro area closeup based on the report One in Seven: Ranking Youth Disconnection in the 25 Largest Metro Areas. To download this report, go to http://www.measureofamerica.org/one-in-seven.