Remove Toews from the bench for conflicts of interest, say ethics experts

Vic Toews to face Canadian Judicial Council review over conflict-of-interest allegations

There are calls for Queens Bench Justice Vic Toews to be removed from the bench for violating federal conflict of interest rules.

Canada's ethics commissioner has found former Conservative cabinet minister broke the rules by doing consulting work for two Manitoba First Nations after he left office. Toews also breached rules requiring a two-year cooling off period for acting as a consultant to the Norway House Cree Nation through a company owned by his wife.

Toews was also found guilty in 2005 of violating Manitoba's Elections Act.

The complaint to the Ethics Commissioner was made in March 2015 after a CBC News investigation.

Removed from the bench?

Toews retired from federal politics in July 2013. He served as Minister of Justice, president of the Treasury Board and Minister of Public Safety in several Conservative cabinets. He worked as a lobbyist and consultant in 2013.

He was appointed to the Manitoba Court of Queens Bench in March of 2014.

Duff Conacher, co-founder of Democracy Watch and visiting professor at the University of Ottawa, says Toews' activities following his political career and the Ethics Commissioner's decision should prompt an investigation by the Canadian Judicial Council — and Toews should lose his judgeship.

"These are fundamental good governance rules that Vic Toews has violated and I think as a result I think the Canadian Judicial Council should be examining his activities and I think this is grounds to have him dismissed as a judge," Connacher says.

Connacher said unless Toews is removed from the bench, the only penalty he will pay is in the court of public opinion. The violations under federal conflict of interest rules are not criminal and carry no fines.

"There is no penalty. He will continue to receive his full pension and his severance as a minister when he left office remains intact. Which is too weak a penalty — to be reported to have violated the law — to discourage people from violating the law," Connacher says.

Connacher's view is shared by University of Manitoba ethics professor Arthur Schafer.

"The rules of the Conflict of Interest Act as they pertain to Mr. Toews are so clear that even a first-year law student wouldn't be in any doubt that what Mr. Toews did was prohibited," Schafer says.

Schafer calls Toews conduct "highly questionable" and said that Manitobans will likely ask whether "someone with such poor judgment" should sit as a judge.

Martin 'gratified'

Former Winnipeg Centre MP Pat Martin filed the complaint, and said he was "gratified that the ethics commissioner stuck with this, for a number of years."

Toews's conduct "doesn't stand up to any ethics standards, especially for a lawyer, a former justice minister and a judge," Martin said Friday. "In my view, a judge has to be held to the highest ethical standard."

Martin said now, there should be a review into how Toews made it to the bench.

"I think there has to be consequences when the ethics commissioner finds you violated the conflict of interest codes as a public office holder," Martin said. "I think at the very least, Mr. Toews should recuse himself until there can be an inquiry as to his suitability to sit on the bench."

In 2007, Toews approved the transfer of the Kapyong Barracks land, a portion of Canadian Forces Base Winnipeg, to the Canada Lands Company.

That decision was challenged in court by several First Nations, including the Peguis First Nation, and Toews was named a respondent in the legal proceedings.

The Federal Court ruled in 2012 that the government had failed to adequately consult First Nations, and set aside the transfer. Toews subsequently acted on behalf of the Peguis First Nation by providing strategic advice to their legal counsel, and by meeting with municipal and provincial officials on the Kapyong file.

The conduct of judges in Canada is the responsibility of the Canadian Judicial Council.

CBC News asked the CJC for what the complaint procedure is for a sitting judge and was given a written response.

"Council's complaints procedures allow that 'The Executive Director may review any matter involving the conduct of a superior court judge that comes to his attention.' We may have more to say in the coming days," wrote Johanna Laporte, director of communications for the CJC.

CBC News has asked for comment from Justice Vic Toews and Manitoba Chief Justice Glenn Joyal and was told by a Justice official that neither could be reached for comment today.

Rules governing the conduct of judges also allow Manitoba's Attorney General to file a complaint to the CJC.

A spokesperson for Justice Minister and Attorney General Heather Stefanson said in a statement that requesting an inquiry into judicial conduct of a superior court judge "would be an extraordinarily rare action for a provincial Attorney General. Our government will review the findings of the federal ethics commissioner and consider if there is an effect on the administration of justice in Manitoba."

A spokesperson for the federal Minister of Justice Jody Wilson-Raybould said her office would need to read the report before commenting.