But it wasn’t planes of consciousness I was asking about. I could give two shits about planes of consciousness. No. And there is AE, thinking me a timid boy, declaring absolute knowledge involves understanding the totality of life. To explain something means to show its connection to everything else. But tell me something, AE, show me the everything else. Where exactly will we stand? How do we sufficiently remove our temporal selves so we can enter into this eternal totality? Where will we in our opalescent hush experience this absolute? Shall we lay on our backs in the grass and looking up into the blue try to think ourselves into the absolute? But our backs, and the grass and the blue, won’t these temporal things get in our way? It is an utter blotting out of self you quote Plotinus (who like you covets out of body experiences, but he is a hydrophobic leper so no wonder), a rapture of peace which will present to us, the more lucid souls amongst the rabblement, the experience of the absolute, the totality of life. Please. Tell me. How do we sufficiently remove ourselves from the totality in order to experience it? We are in it. Where else is there? When else? And we see features of this totality through our individual conceptual and relative frameworks. Emphasis on relative. Absolute, in your mystic envelope my dear AE, it is the merging of the soul with the all the absolute. But for you this must be done independent of relative content. Put yourself in and simultaneously take yourself out. Give me the relative. Well, you don’t have to give it me. I’m filled with it. Infected by it. And so are you. The perception of the observer creates the reality of the observed. I see you. Not you, you. There is no higher absolute, more Godly than the relative, clear to the sensitives. Look at relativity. Do you see it? According to relativity, we can perceive events in time, but not time itself, All time perception is relative to position and velocity, thus there is no absolute time, no absolute. Tell that to AE messiah to the mastermystics. He never packed relativity into his case of tricks.

What are you doing? Me? Oh, I’m typing. Right now I am typing. I am typing now. Here, you see? You can’t see. But what are you doing right now? Listen, I don’t know your now. I can’t know it. Nobody can and you can’t know mine. Picture us together. Go ahead. No, not like that, sheesh! Picture us together standing in a field. We are standing and we see two bolts of lightning strike simultaneously one on the left horizon and one on the right horizon but a bit in front too so we can see them strike down at the same TIME HOLY SHIT GET DOWN! That was close. Did you feel that? Did you feel it? Ok, now rewind, the same lighting strikes are going to happen but this time we are going to stand next to one of them. I know, I know. Trust me. Ok, now we are standing next to where one of them will hit and here IT COMES HOLY FUCKING CHRIST! That was too close. Sorry. You ok? You sure? OK. And look fast over there, the other lightning strike. Did you see it? 5 seconds I’d say. Those were the same ones (we rewound, remember?) but they are not simultaneous anymore because it took time for the light from that lightning strike over there to reach us over here. Ok, so why did I drag you out into this field and nearly kill you? Sorry again by the way, truely. Because I wanted you to see for yourself that simultaneity is relative depending on our position. The now of any event, typing for me and whetever it is that you are doing now (reading I presume, and whatever else you are doing. I’m looking at you sunshine.) You can’t know any now moment unless you know where and how fast. Can any now moment be objective? Don’t answer that. It can’t. It is relativity my dear, it’s relative. And without objective now moments, how can we have such things as lapses of time? Don’t answer that either. We can’t. If there is no absolute now dividing before from after, then no part of succession can have objective status. Do you see where I’m going? When I am going? If successive moments in time depend on our frame of reference, whether we are standing here or there say, the moment we call now cannot be a feature of reality unto itself. Relativity, you see. Causality is gone. Nothing can be said to cause anything now that the now has become so slippery, so protean. Hume says causality is a fiction of the mind, Kant says that the only knowable objective world is a product of the mind, Einstein says successive time is our most persistant illusion. I say this means that we have no free will. But don’t ask me, let’s ask God. Hey God. God. GOOOOD!

God [appears in a thunderclap]: What do you want I’m busy.

No you’re not. Don’t you exist in eternity? You can’t need time to do things if you have all of it.

God: Ok, you got me. I was bluffing. So what do you want? And before you ask, I am not getting anyone to sleep with you and I don’t care if your team wins. Conflicts of interest, you understand. You see the bind I’d be in if everybody asks for opposite things. So hurry up, what do you want?

Well, if you know everything, then you know everything that has happened and you know everything that is going to happen. You know all the past and all the future.

God: Yes, I know everything that is a part of everything. Yawn.

So if you already know everything that is going to happen, then everything we are ever going to do is already done, decided for us. Written down in advance.

God: Yup.

Do we have free will?

God [blushing]: Oh! Shit. Didn’t expect you to ask that question. Well I did, but. Uh. Um. Yeah. Yeah. You have free will. Sure. Why wouldn’t you have free will? You have it. You have lots of it. Yeah. Um. Anyway. I hear sombody calling me. My phone. That’s my phone. Got to take that call. Coming!

[Exeunt]

I have no free will. I am a servant to three masters, a woman for whom I would not kneel, a church for whom I will not kneel, and a third for whom I ask others to kneel, although mostly I have to take care of those jobs myself.