Kidney Stones Landing Increasingly More Women in ER

Below:

Next story in Science

The percentage of U.S. women who visit an emergency room for
kidney stones is on the rise, a new study suggests.

Over a three-year period, the rate of emergency-department visits
for kidney
stones among women increased by 9.2 percent, from 218 visits
per 100,000 women in 2006 to 238 visits per 100,000 women in
2009, the study found.

While men's rate of emergency-department visits due to kidney
stones remains higher than women's, the rise over the last few
years was less pronounced in men: Between 2006 and 2009, the rate
increased just 3.6 percent, from 362 visits per 100,000 men in
2006 to 375 visits per 100,000 men in 2009.

The study adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that the
rate of kidney stones in the United States is increasing. A 2012
U.S. study found that the
rate of people with kidney stones nearly doubled over a
16-year period, from one in 20 in 1994 to one in 11 in 2010.

One reason for the rise may be an increase in the rate of
obesity, which is a risk factor for kidney stones, said Dr.
Khurshid R. Ghani, a urologist at the Henry Ford Health System's
Vattikuti Urology Institute in Detroit and co-author of the new
study.

However, despite the rise in the rates of kidney-stone
emergency-department visits for both men and women, the rate of
hospitalization due to kidney stones remained about the same.

One reason that the rate of hospitalization did not rise
simultaneously may be that doctors today can diagnose kidney
stones faster, and more accurately, than in the past, the
researchers said.

"Today, the emergency-room physician and urologist have access to
better diagnostic tools that allow for a more precise diagnosis,"
Ghani said. "We use a CT [computed tomography] scan, which is a
quick test that allows for an immediate diagnosis."

However, costs of treating kidney stones in the emergency
department rose from $3.8 billion in 2006 to $5 billion in 2009,
which may be related to the increasing use of CT scans for
diagnosis, the researchers said. "While they're wonderful tools
of technology that allow an accurate diagnosis, they are
expensive," Ghani said.