Actually, IMO CIDR is easier than the "old way" of classes.
Now that I use this, I wonder how the old way could have ever made
sense.
Maybe Manuel could add a little helper text or something, but I think
using a crutch when you don't have to isn't really a smart idea.
Have him say that 16 is a 255.255.0.0 etc
Take a quick peak at subnetting on google and it'll give you everything
you need (and more).
-----Original Message-----
From: Francisco Reyes [mailto:lists at natserv dot com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 12:11 PM
To: M0N0Wall firewall
Subject: [m0n0wall] Netmask format
Any thought on having the netmask for the WAN interface in a numeric
format like 255.255.255.248, besides the current format.
That would be a great help for those of us not familiar with subnetting
(ie those of us that are only part time admins and only do small and not
frequent setups).
I was lucky enough that I had easy access to the net so I found a TCP/IP
calculator to find out that I needed to have <IP>/29 in M0n0wall, but I
figure some people may be trying to set it up with nothing but a
printout
from the ISP in which case they simply will be stuck.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch