By the way,
don't forget to let it know, to share the link on your social networks, email,
smartphone messaging.

On the same
web page, you will learn much about precision agriculture, which seeks to
optimize agricultural production, by friendly and precise practices in order to
minimize its negative impacts on environment and health.

http://supportprecisionagriculture.org/index.html

You know
that I'm not a fanatic of petitions, however, you may, like me, find that
traditional methods don't work.

The public
finds science boring and suspect when it tries to explain itself in front of
negative emotions initiated by the rumors.

It always
seems to be apologizing, to be justifying himself.

So it
doesn't work.

Classical
communication is no longer adapted to effective disclosure to the public.

We are in a
communications war. And in a war, the only way to avoid being crushed by the
attacker is to use the same weapons. This is for example the principle of
nuclear deterrence.

The current weapon of mass
destruction is the petition.

Then
let's sign this petition, since it is based, unlike others, on science, the
real one, which is based on experiments, following specific protocols, with
results and conclusions reviewed by scientific committees, which leaves no room
for doubt on the value of the results.

Because
doubt exists, even in the most serious scientific results. It exists because it
is made and insinuated by people who won't accept these results if they go
against their ideology. And it's the case of, guess a little ... Greenpeace and
other environmentalist purely political movements.

Greenpeace
ceased to be a movement of defense of the environment long time ago. It became
an ideological and political movement, to which human life and humanistic ideas
are above all obstacles.

Greenpeace has gradually been
transformed into Greenwar, to finally become Greendeath.

All this
without changing its name. The concepts of war and death are still less buoyant
than the notion of peace, even if it's a lie. The means don't matter, only the
result account (see

Because in
number of victims, Greenpeace is on the same level as the worst dictatorships
in modern history, Nazi, Soviet, Chinese, Khmer and well ahead of dictatorships
like those of Argentina, Chile, Italy, Greece or Spain, among others and also
before Daech (Isis), currently terrorizing the world.

Obviously,
Greenpeace does not kill directly, victims don't fall bleeding in front of
militants, but collateral damages of its actions don't scare to it.

I am French
and my country is hardly hit by the attacks. See the hype (normal under the circumstances)
in western countries, after the recent tragic bombings in Nice or Paris.

But they are
silent, remote, non-contagious, everyday deaths. There is no show. These are
deaths that don't threaten us, that don't impress us, that don't stir us.

Still, I'm talking about 5000
children victims a day!!!

And the simplest and fastest
solution to implement is prohibited because some lawless fanatics, put forward
the precautionary principle???

Someone dares to seriously think
that the precautionary principle prevails over the humanitarian emergency and
the death of 5,000 children a day???

But in what kind of world do we
live?

See
what does not hesitate to write this militant in a response to this open
letter, in the introduction of a militant diatribe, in a Mexican publication
"It's not often that so many prominent scientists reveal their ignorance
on a topic in such a short space ".

It's
amazing. Dare to speak of ignorance about such an important Nobel panel. She
got a lot of nerve!!!

Obviously,
following the habit of Greenpeace, she reinforces her speech by insinuating or
tenderizing, as appropriate:

-These
personalities are in the pay of companies specializing in GMOs. Already the
title is clear "Nobel Laureates serving Monsanto and Syngenta", usual
speech without any foundation, defamation that is waved when there is no more
valid argument. This is even more true, that Golden Rice, if it happens one day
to be sowed, will be completely free of rights, precisely so that the poorest
can dispose of easily,

-That
golden rice is useless because it does not exist. This is true and relatively
normal, since Greenpeace systematically destroyed all the experimental fields,
causing huge delays and thus preventing any actual tests, for 20 years,

-That
GMOs are entirely controlled by 4 multinationals. This is absolutely false. See
my post https://culturagriculture.blogspot.com.es/2015/09/53-gmo-why-not.html,
in which I explain how more and more countries develop their own genetic
research to make them available at no additional cost to their farmers, as is
the case of Cuba, Philippines o Bangladesh for example,

-That
there are many other sources of vitamin A or beta-carotene. Sure, but precisely
these people don't have access to these sources for technical or climatic
reasons. Rice is almost their only food source. So stop telling this nonsense,
just to try to justify the blockade and to blame others.

It's not me, it's the other one!

It makes me
nauseous.

It's
so easy. You launch a charge in the air without any basis, just to leave some
doubt, some suspicion. It has become the trademark of Greenpeace, the world's
largest factory of partisan rumors, and the active organization directly
responsible of the major number of deaths.

So let's be reasonable, let's try,
at least, in a well-defined and monitored way, with confined experimental
golden rice fields, but of sufficient size, under strict environmental control.
This golden rice will be distributed among the poorest populations, and we will
see full scale if it works or not. This is the only way to know. These people
will be experimental populations and this is ethically questionable? Yes, but
otherwise they are condemned to death!!!

Let's give these people a chance to
survive!!!

But will
Greenpeace be able to accept this experiment, without considering it as a
defeat?

And
governments and other responsible bodies, will they be able to stand up to
Greenpeace, to put the interests of poor people before their shabby little
political calculations?

Agriculture is totally frustrated
with these movements that manipulate ignorance as a mean of pressure on the
leaders, as a weapon of mass destruction.

Farmers, sensible people, and those
who refuse to be manipulated, can and should defend it.

So if you have signed this
petition, let it know and share it massively on your social networks.

Be proud of that decision.

And if we
let some humanity prevail over dogmatism of Greenpeace, right?

And if science really rebelled
against obscurantism and dogmatism?

And if
science shared its researches to the public, in its own way and without waiting
to be attacked?

You signed? Be proud to have raised
your head against the eco-political oppressor.