On Jun 9, 2008, at 9:21 AM, Kevin Kuphal wrote:
> The original message indicated he did this already. My gut says the
> 512MB is far too little despite assertations otherwise.
We never got solid numbers from top to see how much swap is being used
(if at all). My gut says he's running transcode jobs, commercial flag
jobs, some other processes and he's swapping RAM which absolutely
kills mysql performance. RAM is cheap. Get more. :)