HOW MANY INNOCENT PEOPLE WILL BE MURDERED BY BLACKS TODAY?..........THE LOOTING ACROSS AMERICA is as black as the staggering murder and crime rates of BLACKS ACROSS AMERICA. Black Lives Matter? NO LIFE MATTERS TO BLACKS!

Monday, July 25, 2016

VIVA LA RAZA SUPREMACY AND EXPANSION OF THE MEX WELFARE STATE ON OUR BACKS?............... amnesty.... it's all about keeping wages depressed and building the Democrat Party's La Raza Supremacy base of looting illegals!"Although Kaine himself is not Hispanic, the Clinton campaign is evidently hoping to capitalize on Kaine’s bilingualism and

Catholic faith in order to appeal to Hispanic voters.""To the extent that this nebulous term signifies support for social reforms, it bears no relation to the actual political record of Kaine, a tried and tested supporter of big business and the military, or of Clinton herself, a war criminal and millionaire representative of Wall Street."

Clinton’s VP pick Tim Kaine: A supporter of war and big business

By Tom Hall 25 July 2016

Clinton’s selection of Tim Kaine, the senator and former governor of Virginia, is a clear indication of the right-wing character of Clinton’s strategy in the US elections. Clinton is basing her campaign on an appeal to the military/intelligence apparatus and to disaffected sections of the Republican Party on the grounds that she, in contrast to the “unreliable” and “temperamentally unfit” Donald Trump, would make the most reliable commander-in-chief for American imperialism.

In Miami on Saturday, in their first joint appearance since the announcement the previous night, Clinton introduced Kaine as a “progressive.” To the extent that this nebulous term signifies support for social reforms, it bears no relation to the actual political record of Kaine, a tried and tested supporter of big business and the military, or of Clinton herself, a war criminal and millionaire representativeof Wall Street.

Kaine, who is fluent in Spanish from his time as a Catholic missionary in Honduras in the 1980s, addressed the Miami crowd in both English and Spanish. Although Kaine himself is not Hispanic, the Clintoncampaign is evidently hoping to capitalize on Kaine’s bilingualism and Catholic faith in order to appeal to Hispanic voters.

More fundamentally, however, the selection of Kaine is an indication of the type of administration that Clinton intends to form if she is elected president. The responsibilities of the vice president have grown tremendously in recent years. No longer a mere political ornament and standby in case of the incapacitation of the president (John Garner, Franklin Roosevelt’s first vice president, famously declared that the position was “not worth a bucket of warm piss”), the second in line to the president now routinely plays a major role in activities of the executive branch, in particular the conduct of American foreign policy.

Only last week, President Barack Obama dispatched Joe Biden on an official state visit to Australia to issue bellicose threats against China and to keep Australian imperialism in line with the United States’ aggressive posturing against China under the so-called “pivot to Asia.” The central role that George W. Bush’s vice president, Dick Cheney, played in planning and carrying out the invasion of Iraq in 2003, along with countless other crimes, is well known.

Kaine is a longstanding ally of the military/intelligence apparatus who sits on the Senate Foreign Relations and Armed Services Committees. From 2006 to 2010, Kaine served as governor of the state of Virginia, home to the Pentagon and the central offices of the CIA, and a hub for military contractors and related industries. Virginia-based companies held more than $96 billion in defense contracts in 2012–2013, two years after Kaine left office.

Since entering the Senate in 2013, Kaine has distinguished himself for consistently supporting the foreign policy of the Obama administration. From the indefinite prolonging of the war in Afghanistan to the aggressive posturing against Russia and China, Kaine has either supported the administration or criticized it for not going far enough.

Kaine has also repeatedly called for a congressional resolution officially authorizing war against ISIS in order to lend political legitimacy to a significant expansion of the US war for regime change in Syria. “The framers of the Constitution understood then, as now, that the decision of whether to place citizens in harm’s way in defense of this nation—to declare war—must be made by the people through their elected representatives,” Kaine declared in a statement last October, after the administration’s deployment of US forces to Syria. In other words, Kaine’s principal concern is that the war in Syria, a war crime which has turned half of the country into refugees, be provided a pseudo-democratic cover.

Kaine supports the Obama administration’s pivot to Asia. He released a statement backing the politically-motivated ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration against Chinese territorial claims in the South China Sea, a case brought by the Philippines at the prodding of the United States. Kaine is also a longstanding supporter of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement. While the TPP has been attacked by Bernie Sanders and others on protectionist grounds, its principal aim is to serve as the economic component of the pivot to Asia, creating a trading bloc in the Asia-Pacific region directed against China. However, Kaine has changed his public stance after being named as Clintons’ running mate, as Clinton herself has rhetorically moderated her support for the TPP.

Kaine’s time as a lay Jesuit missionary in Honduras in the early 1980s is also significant. While there is no evidence that Kaine was directly involved, the entire decade in Central America was dominated by a series of assassination campaigns and military dictatorships backed by the CIA, including the infamous war of the Contras against the left-nationalist Sandinista regime in neighboring Nicaragua. While many priests were also targeted during this period by government assassination squads, the Catholic Church hierarchy in Latin America was deeply implicated in fingering suspected leftists and anti-government figures.

Kaine is a close friend and ally of big business. As governor, Kaine accepted gifts from executives and corporate lobbyists worth more than $160,000, including trips in private planes throughout the country, according to a report in the New York Times. Many of these gifts were given in exchange for political favors. In one case highlighted by the Times, a pharmaceuticals company picked up the tab on Kaine’s trip to a summit in Aspen, Colorado shortly after he signed an open letter to the federal Food and Drug Administration, drafted by their lobbyists, on the company’s behalf. The scale of corporate bribery in Kaine’s administration was so great that the governor kept a “swag room” filled with gifts he received during his term in office.

Kaine slashed social spending while governor of Virginia and oversaw $4.64 billion in cuts during his four-year term. Kaine’s last budget proposal, which was eventually passed with amendments after he left office, called for a 26 percent cut to funding for public colleges and universities and $419 million in cuts from the state Medicaid budget. Kaine was rewarded for his services with an appointment by Obama to chair the Democratic National Committee, a post he held for two years before running for Senate in 2012.

Kaine is a law-and-order figure who supports the augmenting of the repressive powers of the police. A recent report by Reuters noted that he was a strong backer of “Project Exile,” a federal “anti-crime” initiative in Virginia during his tenure as the mayor of Richmond, Virginia’s fifth-largest city. A summary of the program on the federal National Institute of Justice’s web site describes it as a “sentence enhancement program” that prosecuted felons carrying firearms “in federal courts where they received harsher sentences, no option of bail, and no potential for early release,” contributing to the explosion of mass incarceration in the United States.

Kaine was also one of many Senate Democrats who supported prohibiting the sale of firearms to individuals on the government’s secret “no-fly list” in the aftermath of the mass shooting in Orlando, an arbitrary measure with anti-democratic implications.

The selection of Kaine is also clearly aligned with Clinton’s desire to repudiate any association with the issues of social inequality that dominated her primary contest with Bernie Sanders in favor of appealing to sections of the Republican Party establishment who are opposed to the candidacy of Trump. While a figure with greater “progressive” credentials, such as Massachusetts senator and former banking regulator Elizabeth Warren, had originally been considered as a gesture to Sanders supporters, Clinton has chosen instead to rely upon Sanders himself to corral them behind her campaign.

Sunday’s announcement that Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz would resign following the convention, a demand that had been raised in recent months by Sanders in order to provide himself with political cover and promote the illusion that the Democratic Party can be reformed, was undoubtedly the outcome of a behind-the-scenes deal to facilitate this support.

An article published by Politico yesterday, titled “Tim Kaine’s Republican fan club,” collected statements supporting Kaine from Republicans who have either yet to formally endorse Trump or who have publicly sparred with him over the course of the election campaign, including Senators Lindsey Graham, John McCain and Jeff Flake. The article pointed out the close personal relationship between Kaine and Ted Cruz, who refused to formally endorse Trump on the stage of the Republican National Convention. It also noted the central role Kaine had played in forcing a vote in Congress on the Obama administration’s nuclear deal with Iran, a demand raised by congressional Republicans.

Kaine is also a devout Catholic and social conservative who opposed abortion rights early on his career, although he has since softened his public stance. While he claims to oppose the death penalty, he allowed several executions to go forward during his term as governor.

The selection of Tim Kaine is a further demonstration that workers will be disenfranchised in the presidential election. No matter who wins the presidency in November, a massive escalation of war, austerity and repression is being prepared.

WASHINGTON, DC (July 11, 2016) — A recent report by the Center for Immigration Studies reveals that the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP), which distributes what used to be called food stamps, provides benefits to families with an illegal alien (or other ineligible alien) wage earner in it, while denying benefits to an identical family comprised of only U.S. citizens.

Although two families may be identical in terms of income and family size, states have the option of including only part of the wages of an employed ineligible alien when calculating SNAP eligibility. Those states which do not count all the income of the ineligible aliens make it easier for a family with an illegal alien present to qualify for food stamps than for an identical all-citizen family. Ineligible aliens, in the food stamp program, are primarily illegal aliens and those green card holders who have been in that status for less than five years.

David North, a fellow with the Center and author of the report, said, “A bias exists against those here legally when calculating eligibility for food stamps. This overt bias, which most legislators are probably not even aware of, translates into an estimated 1.4 billion dollar cost to tax payers.”

Only six states or territories show no bias and include all family income: Arizona, Guam, Massachusetts, New Mexico, North Carolina, and Utah.

The majority of states employ a "proration" policy posture, meaning families including an employed ineligible alien can secure food stamps when an all-citizen family of the same size and with the same income would be denied the benefits. States are not incentivized to change their proration policy as the federal government pays for SNAP, not the state governments.

The proration formula is inherently unfair to the citizen family, and it also comes with a price tag. The Center calculated the cost of this proration policy and found that well over one billion dollars was being unnecessarily spent.

Californians bear an enormous fiscal burden as a result of an illegal alien population estimated at almost 3 million residents. The annual expenditure of state and local tax dollars on services for that population is $25.3 billion. That total amounts to a yearly burden of about $2,370 for a household headed by a U.S. citizen.

Nearly half of those expenditures ($12.3 billion) result from the costs of K-12 education for the children of illegal aliens — both those illegally in the country and those born in the United States. Another major outlay ($2.1 billion) results from the need to provide supplemental English language instruction to Limited English Proficient students, many of whom are children of illegal aliens. Together, these educational costs are 57.1 percent of total expenditures.

Other fiscal outlays result from the costs of medical care ($4.0 billion), public assistance services ($800 million), administration of justice functions ($4.4 billion), and general governmental services ($1.6 billion).

(THE LA RAZA MEXICAN TAX-FREE UNDERGROUND ECONOMY IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE IS CALCULATED TO BE IN EXCESS OF $2 BILLION PER YEAR. THESE ARE CONSTRUCTION WORKERS, GARDENERS, CONTRACTORS, TACO TRUCKS, HOUSEHOLD HELP, ETC.)

Because some tax revenue is collected from the illegal alien population, we include an estimate of this revenue from sales, income, property and "sin" taxes. Yet, it should be kept in mind that the $3.5 billion in tax collections is not truly an offset to the fiscal costs, because similar, and likely greater, tax revenue would be collected if the same jobs were filled by legal workers.

The adoption of new amnesty legislation, such as Senate bill S.774, the so-called Gang of Eight bill, backed by the Obama administration, would not be an economic benefit to Californian taxpayers as some have argued. Amnesty advocates assert that providing legal status to illegal aliens would reduce the cost of "undocumented immigrants." That is akin to arguing that the way to reduce speeding on the highways is to abolish speed limits. Doing so would eliminate speeding, but it would not eliminate the danger of operating vehicles at excessive speed, and, arguably, would have the opposite effect. Similarly, converting illegal aliens into legal residents would reduce the size of the illegal alien population, but it would not reduce the overall fiscal outlays associated with that population, and arguably would significantly increase them as the newly legalized residents became eligible for public assistance that was denied to them while they did not have legal status. It would also lead to additional illegal immigration as happened following the 1986 amnesty, which would further increase the fiscal burden.

The costs related to the presence of illegal aliens can be lowered. The most effective step a state can take to discourage the arrival of illegal aliens is to utilize the E-Verify screening system designed to prevent employers from hiring illegal workers. California instead is moving in the opposite direction by adopting measures designed to accommodate the presence of illegal aliens. A.B. 4, the so-called Trust Act, restricts the cooperation between state and local law enforcement agencies with federal immigration authorities. A more recent law, A.B. 60, gives illegal aliens access to driver’s licenses. This measure alone is going to cost the state of California, by its own admission, $64.7 million per year.

WELFARE – THE STAGGERING COST OF MEXICO’S LA RAZA WELFARE STATE IN AMERICA. THESE ARE !ONLY! WELFARE COST AND DO NOT INCLUDE THE COST OF THE MEXICAN CRIME TIDAL WAVE, OR THE ULTIMATE COST OF MEXICO’S ASSAULT ON OUR BORDERS, LAWS AND CULTURE… Push 2 for English!

According to the Centers for Immigration Studies, April '11, at least 70% of Mexican illegal alien families receive some type of welfare in the US!!! cis.org

While the Obama Administration halts deportations to work on its secret amnesty plan, hospitals across the U.S. are getting stuck with the exorbitant tab of medically treating illegal immigrants and some are finally demanding compensation from the federal government

MEXICAN CONSULATES – HEADQUARTERS FOR THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA “THE RACE” INSTRUCTS CRIMINAL ILLEGALS ON LOOTING AMERICANS… but then it’s by invitation of the DEMOCRAT PARTY! …. these same illegals already get our jobs!

“The watchdogs at Judicial Watch discovered documents that reveal how the Obama administration's close coordination with the Mexican government entices Mexicans to hop over the fence and on to the American dole.”Washington Times

Californians bear an enormous fiscal burden as a result of an illegal alien population estimated at almost 3 million residents. The annual expenditure of state and local tax dollars on services for that population is $25.3 billion. That total amounts to a yearly burden of about $2,370 for a household headed by a U.S. citizen.

Immigration’s bottom line has shifted so sharply that in a high-immigration state like California, native-born residents are paying up to ten times more in state and local taxes than immigrants generate in economic benefits.