Why non-air-conditioned buildings may harm your child

July 14, 2018

Students who lived in dormitories without air conditioning (AC) during a heat wave performed worse on a series of cognitive tests compared with students who lived in air-conditioned dorms, according to new research led by Harvard T.H Chan School of Public Health.

The field study is the first to demonstrate the detrimental cognitive effects of indoor temperatures during a heat wave in a group of young healthy individuals.

It highlights the need for sustainable design solutions in mitigating the health impacts of extreme heat.

Extreme heat can have severe consequences for public health and is the leading cause of death of all meteorological phenomena in the U.S. Temperatures around the world are rising, with 2016 marking the warmest year on record for the past two centuries.

While the health impacts of extreme heat are well documented, most studies to date have focused on vulnerable populations, including the very young or the elderly, and tend to be epidemiologic studies that use outdoor temperature records.

Understanding the effects of indoor temperatures is important given that adults in the U.S. spend 90% of their time indoors.

For this new study, researchers tracked 44 students in their late teens and early 20s living in dorm rooms.

Twenty-four of the students lived in adjacent six-story buildings that were built in the early 1990s and had central AC.

The remaining 20 students lived in low-rise buildings constructed between 1930 and 1950 that did not have AC.

Researchers outfitted each student’s room with a device that measured temperature, carbon dioxide levels, humidity, and noise levels, and tracked their physical activity and sleep patterns with wearable devices.

The study was conducted over 12 consecutive days in the summer of 2016. The first five days consisted of seasonable temperatures, followed by a five-day-long heat wave, and then a two-day cooldown.

Each day the students took two cognition tests on their smartphones right after waking up.

The first test required students to correctly identify the color of displayed words and was used to evaluate cognitive speed and inhibitory control—or the ability to focus on relevant stimuli when irrelevant stimuli are also present.

The second test consisted of basic arithmetic questions and was used to assess cognitive speed and working memory.

The findings showed that during the heat wave, students in the buildings without AC performed worse on the tests than students in the air-conditioned dormitories and experienced decreases across five measures of cognitive function, including reaction times and working memory.

During the heat wave, students in buildings without AC experienced 13.4% longer reaction times on color-word tests, and 13.3% lower addition/subtraction test scores compared with students with air-conditioned rooms.

Combined, these data show that students in rooms with AC were not just faster in their responses, but also more accurate.

Interestingly, the most significant difference in cognitive function between the two groups was seen during the cooldown period, when outdoor temperatures began to subside but indoor temperatures remained elevated in the dormitories without air conditioning.

“Indoor temperatures often continue to rise even after outdoor temperatures subside, giving the false impression that the hazard has passed, when in fact the ‘indoor heat wave’ continues.” said one author.

“In regions of the world with predominantly cold climates, buildings were designed to retain heat.

These buildings have a hard time shedding heat during hotter summer days created by the changing climate, giving rise to indoor heat waves.”

The study is published in PLOS Medicine as part of a special issue dedicated to climate change and health.