Monthly Archives: February 2017

I was thinking what if any connection there is between the Jews and Phoenicians. The colour purple supposedly originates from the Phoenicians so I put “purple Jews” into Google. The first result I got was an article titled: “Growing Wandering Jew Plants – How To Grow Wandering Jew Plants”. Apparently there is a purple plant called wandering jew.

On the gardening website I saw a related article titled “Killing Wandering Jew… Plants: How to Get Rid of Wandering Jew Weeds In The Garden”. I added the three dots. I’m surprised the ADL hasn’t deemed these weeds anti-Semitic.

Apparently there are at least two kinds of wandering jew plants, weeds and “good jews”. The “good jew” is Tradescantia pallida, a purple plant, whereas the weed is Tradescantia fluminensis, a White plant. I guess that answers the question are Jews White? Looks Purple to me.

Let’s not get side-tracked to botany any longer. I was supposed to discuss Jews and the colour purple. The Phoenicians got their purple dye from sea snails. This is called Tyrian purple. A Wikipedia article on Jewish symbolism says that Israelites used to have an indigo or purple-blue dye called “tekhelet”. This is derived from a sea snail called Hexaplex trunculus. This dye appears to have been similar yet different to the Tyrian purple. That dye was derived from the sea slug Murex brandaris (currently named Bolinus brandaris). Interestingly the Wikipedia article on Hexaplex trunculus decribes “tekhelet” as purple-blue, and Tyrian purple as purple-red. They are both different hues of purple apparently.

While this does not prove any indisputable connection between Jews and the Phoenicians, it appears they had a similar technique of obtaining purplish dye from sea snails. Whether it actually means anything, I do not know. The Wikipedia article on Tyrian purple mentions one interesting fact:

“Recent research in organic electronics has shown that Tyrian purple is an ambipolar organic semiconductor. Transistors and circuits based on this material can be produced from sublimed thin-films of the dye. The good semiconducting properties of the dye originate from strong intermolecular hydrogen bonding that reinforces pi stacking necessary for transport.”

This sounds like it might be significant. However, I don’t know what an “ambipolar organic semiconductor”, and what people in classical times would have done with such substances. Did the ancient Phoenicians make transistors and circuits with their dye?

As usual NASA has only provided CGI images of the Trappist-1 system. There are no photos. There are only artist’s renditions. Maybe I’m just a simple country boy, but I thought in science you have to prove your claims. I guess NASA has no need for that.

The NASA website has these pictures.

Looks pretty, yet has little actual significance. Besides this picture shows water. Have they found it on one of the new exoplanets?

Not a photo.

Caption on NASA website: “This poster imagines what a trip to TRAPPIST-1e might be like.”

This is perfect. It encapsulates all that NASA is. This is science fiction. Assuming that this planet even exists, maybe NASA should put a man on the moon or on Mars before they start hyping up this solar system that is 40 light-years away that they just allegedly discovered. They sell you fantasies like Hollywood and advertisement companies.

BTW, last night I was playing around with my own telescope and took a picture of a space ship, and a new alien planet with life on it.

If you doubt me, you’re a crazy conspiracy theorist. I’ve provided as much evidence as NASA did.

The newly discovered star system was named after the Trappist telescope that is situated in Chile, but operated from Belgium. Here’s a picture of it.

At least I believe this telescope exists. It sounds weird to me though that the telescope is in Chile, but they control it from Belgium. Wouldn’t it be simpler just to have a team in Chile controlling it? Or perhaps it is easier feed the scientists false data if they aren’t looking through it with their own eyes?

The sevel planets around Trappist-1 were supposedly detected with Spitzer Space Telescope, i.e. a telescope that is floating out in space. I’m doubtful that this telescope exists. The Wikipedia page for it shows the alleged telescope under a tarp, and it looks unfinished.

I also found several pictures of it being assembled, but no actual photos of the finished product.

Wikipedia has an artist rendering of it, and I found several similar ones on Google. I understand that if the telescope is actually out in space it’s not easy to take pictures of it, yet I’ve yet to see any pictures taken of it prior launching it to space. Taking into account the fact that NASA admits they cannot go beyond low earth orbit, I’m inclined to believe they didn’t send that thing into space. The pictures showing the telescope being assembled were probably made in benefit to gullible NASA employees who really believe NASA sends stuff out into space. “I saw them assemble the telescope. It’s real.”

I think it’s time to people to admit to themselves NASA has no credibility. Or if you still believe their claims, please do challenge me. Try to prove me wrong, and provide actual evidence of these exoplanets. NASA’s purpose is to create appealing images in the minds of people, like Eddie Bernays did back in the day by having the beautiful models smoke “liberty torches” so women would start smoking, or De Beers making people associate diamonds with romance.

I am doubtful NASA actually engages in any space exploration. Rather I think they are in the entertainment/deception business. They might actually partake in some space exploration, but as most of the information that comes out of them is unreliable, and they’ve been caught lying several times, it is prudent to be skeptical of their claims and intentions. I will explore NASA’s recent claim that they discovered 7 Earth-sized exoplanets in Trappist-1 (star or system?) from this viewpoint.

The star Trappist-1 is, according to The Atlantic website, located about 40 light-years from Earth. It’s size is only slightly bigger than Jupiter. The Atlantic states as follows: “The system resembles Jupiter’s moons Ganymede, Europa, and Io”. I doubt these 7 planets actually exist. I rather think it’s some sort of astrological meme-magic they are trying to feed to us. Let’s take a look at the meaning of some of these names.

Trappist refers to a kind of monk from the Trappist order. The name apparently comes from the abbey of La Trappe in France. Among us regular people the word Trappist is best known from certain types of beers, and I think there’s also Trappist milk in Hong Kong at least. According to Wikipedia, Trappists are contemplative order, they do not take vow of silence but refrain from speaking when not necessary. They follow the rule of St. Benedict. I’m not sure what its significance is, but it might mean something that previous pope, Ratzinger’s, papal name was Benedict.

The Trappist Cisterian order was founded by Armand Jean le Bouthillier de Rancé. I don’t know his significance either. Wikipedia says that he was “originally intended for the Knights of Malta”, but became a monk instead, I suppose. Knights of Malta is a secret society that still exists today. I don’t know if any of is significant in relation to NASA’s alleged discovery, but it might be.

It’s curious that Jupiter is connected to this new star system, as Jupiter is not only another persona of Osiris, a deity supposedly important to modern secret societies, but it also allegedly represents a shift in the secret society structures.

Ganymede was a beautiful man abducted by Zeus (Jupiter) to be his cup-bearer. Wikipedia explains this about him: “The myth was a model for the Greek social custom of paiderastía, the socially acceptable erotic relationship between an adult male and an adolescent male. The Latin form of the name was Catamitus (and also ‘Ganymedes’), from which the English word ‘catamite’ is derived.” A man abducted for his beauty by Zeus and associated with pedophilia.

Io was a mortal woman whom Zeus lusted after, and she became his lover. She was turned a heifer at some point. Interestingly Wikipedia says that the “ancients connected Io with the Moon”, and in Aeschylus’ Prometheus Unbound “she refers to herself as ‘the horned virgin’, both bovine and lunar.” This reminds me of the various Virgin Mary icons with her standing on a crescent moon.

Europa too was a woman abducted by Zeus. The Rape of Europa is a well-known phrase, and unfortunately a well-known event in recent years.

What do these mythological connections mean then? I naturally don’t know, but I have a few interpretations. Ganymede was a beautiful man whom Zeus (Jupiter) took a liking to and was associated with pederasty, and Io and Europa were women whom Zeus liked. All were mortals. This certainly sounds a bit like Genesis 6:2; “That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.” Perhaps Zeus (Jupiter) refers to Nephilim, demons, aliens, or just the occult elite who are going to revel in even more twisted Pizzagate-like debauchery.

Then again, perhaps the connection between Jupiter, Ganymede and Io refers to the trinity of Osiris, Horus and Isis. Zeus took the form of an eagle when he abducted Ganymede, and Horus is a falcon-headed man. Io is associated with the moon and horns as is Isis. Though I’m not sure where Europa fits in with this. I’m also not sure what is the significance of Trappist monks with this. Maybe the word Trappist should be interpreted literally, as in people who make traps. Are the secret society occultists setting some sort of trap?

Many conspiracy researchers claim that the elites worship Saturn. Saturn is the father of Jupiter. Jupiter killed him and became the chief deity. These 7 exoplanets might be Jupiter’s army that heralds the dawn of a new era, Saturn getting replaced with Jupiter. Whether this would make things better or worse, I cannot say.

I don’t know to what all of this refers, but I certainly don’t believe any of NASA’s claims at face value. I find a symbolical or occult explanation for these alleged discoveries a much more reasonable one. NASA comes up with a new discovery or accomplishment every couple of years ago that gets science-geeks excited for a few weeks and then it blows over. People forget, and in the end nothing concrete gets done. Science does not actually advance. No new technologies are developed. Whether it’s the alleged trip to Mars that people are supposedly planning, a new discovery, or even the supposed discovery of the Higgs-Boson God particle a few years ago. I know that wasn’t NASA, but it’s still part of the same scientism-industry. All of this is still just a more sophisticated form of celebrity gossip. It’s there just to distract you, or to somehow psychically manipulate you.

Pedophilia has certainly been in the headlines recently. There was, and hopefully still is Pizzagate, just a few days ago Milo Yiannopoulos was kicked from CPAC for supposed pedophiliac comments, and George Takei seems to be undergoing a similar scandal. Ganymede seems to refer to the same thing, but I’m sure what it all means. I hope it simply means that the crimes of these pederasts will be exposed and they will get judged.

When discussing the influence that Jews wield in the media, economics and other aspects of modern society, influential people like George Soros and Henry Kissinger are usually brought up. Some see their Jewishness as merely co-incidental, bearing little significance in the role they play, whereas others, myself included, see their Jewishness as one of the most significant details in their character and background. While these elite class Jews are highlighted, Judaism itself is often excused from criticism saying that only the Zionists, or members of the Jewish cabal, are bad, but regular Jews are not like that. There are some people though, who say that there are no good Jews.

I am not quite certain what to think, so I’ll just share a few examples of Jewish behaviour. I saw these on /pol a few weeks ago.

My first piece of evidence is this video of a man holding up a sign saying one side: “Repent! Trump is God’s punishment on America”. On the other it says: “White men against Trump”. The person taking the video, however, calls out the man as a Jew. The Jew not only admits that he is Jewish, but the video guy says Jews aren’t White to which a woman on the side says [being White or being Jewish] “is the same thing”, the video guy says he read on the forum that Jews aren’t White, and the Jew says: “That’s true.”

EDIT: The original video had been up on Youtube for a few weeks, but soon after I embedded it here, it was shut down for “harassment and bullying”. I found another channel that has the video though.

Basically in the video a Jew is pretending to be a White man to persuade “other” White people to be anti-Trump, although he himself does not think of himself as White.

There’s also a few Tweets I’ve seen with similar behaviour of Jews being White one time, and Jewish another.

In the first picture is one guy saying “as a white guy…” and in the next “As a Jew…” Which one is it? White or Jewish? There’s only 1-2 weeks between these Tweets so I doubt he had a drastic change of identity in that time (and the Jew-Tweet happened first).

The next one is from a Jewish woman complaining about White Privilege™, and saying “My fellow white people”, i.e. she is allegedly identifies as White, and wants to share her racial guilt with others. In the next picture, she says she has a Jewish family. So maybe she isn’t Jewish herself, but her family is? The Jew-Tweet was from 2009 and the White Privilege one was from 2016, so a change of ideology is more reasonable possibility in this case.

Nevertheless, this is still evidence of this Jewish racial double-think even if we cannot be sure whether this woman is Jewish or not, and there are several years between these Tweets.

The third picture is of a Jewish woman who in the first Tweet complains about “my fellow white people” having been raised to behave like sociopaths. In the second Tweet she says she was “raised orthodox Jewish”. Although the date isn’t shown on the picture, I checked her Twitter and both Tweets are from 2016.

This is a clear example of Jewish racial duplicity. Moreover it’s interesting that in both Tweets she is referring to how she (as a White person) has been raised, first how to be a sociopath and in the second she has been raised to be an Orthodox Jew. Perhaps her mind is somewhat split on the issue, and she was raised to be a sociopath by her Orthodox Jewish upbringing.

There’s also an opinion piece from Jewish Journal and a blog from The Times of Israel both saying that Jews aren’t White. The first article praises that “Jews will always believe Black Lives matter because Jews do not think of themselves as ‘White People.'” In Tel Aviv there are Jews from various races. The blog post from The Times of Israel takes another approach and states that Ashkenazi Jews are not White.

While you could just take the easy way out and say that different Jews have different views on race and Jewishness, but that’s not really what I see. What I see is that a Jew is White when he or she wants to berate White people for their real and imagined sins, but when a Jew wants sympathy for being oppressed, praise for being progressive or simply wants to celebrate their culture, the Jew becomes a Jew. Basically a Jew is White only to attack White culture and identity, and even then the Jew presents him or herself as more noble than “other Whites” who do not understand their privilege as well as the Jew does.

My point is not that Jews should not criticize White people, but when Jews do it, they do it from a highly dishonest position. People of all races have certainly done reprehensible acts in the history of the world, but there difference with Jews and all other races seem to be that the Jew is unwilling to assume responsibility for their sins, and try to blame others instead.

The whole worldview of the Jew seems highly relativistic. You are one thing when it suits you, and another when it ceases to work for you. The only consistent aspect of a Jew is that they are a Jew. When trying to identify the specifics of what makes a Jew, sooner or later you will encounter a dead-end. Sometimes Jews are race, other times they are a religion, but there are plenty of atheist Jews so they might be a culture. Trying to chase that trail will just leave your head spinning. The Jew is a Jew.

Certainly the video and few quotes presented here are merely anecdotal evidence, yet based on what I’ve seen from the behaviour of Jews, they seem fairly representative. One thing that I wonder about is do the Jews do the “racial shift” from Jew to White and back again consciously or unconsciously? The Jew in the video with the anti-Trump sign certainly seems to be acting wittingly, but I am not so sure about the Tweets. The mind of the average Jew might be schizophrenic in some sense, and they themselves do not realize what they are doing. They are acting subversively because it is in their nature to do so.

Anyway, before I finish I’d just like to add I am not writing this to say that we should start rounding up Jews and gassing them or anything like that. I am merely pointing out this intriguing, yet possibly harmful characteristic in Jews, in the hope that you take heed of this.

P.S.

Thinking of the nature of the Jew has made recall a book I read a few years ago, Dispelling Wetiko by Paul Levy. It describes this parasitic mind virus that affects the humanity. It doesn’t exist in the absolute sense, yet it does exist as you can see it’s influence in the world and in the behaviour of the people. Pinpointing the Wetiko virus is difficult as if you point at one thing and say it is Wetiko, then the virus is deluding, you but also if you say it doesn’t exist you are getting deluded. It is much like the nature of the Jew. More interestingly I think the author, Paul Levy, might be a Jew. His name certainly sounds like it.

The other day Antifa (or Anti-Fascists or just Communists) started a riot in Berkeley. As far as I understand the riot erupted because the “conservative” journalist Milo Yiannopoulos was supposed to give a speech there. The speech was cancelled due to the riot. Today another riot erupted in NYU college in New York as another “conservative” Gavin McInnes was supposed to hold a speech there. I didn’t even know who he was prior to the anti-Islamic homosexual kiss between him and Milo last year. That’s a perfect example of how conservative they are.

It is common knowledge that Antifa is funded by George Soros, and it’s just another globalist scheme. However, when it comes to these two conflicts, and I suspect more will arise in the near future, I don’t think only the aggressor is controlled. Both Milo and McInnes are controlled opposition, and I believe the whole scenario of them going there to hold a speech and Antifa causing trouble is a globalist manufactured event. It’s classic problem-reaction-solution. Yet I am not sure what the solution will be. It might simple be an attempt to delegitimize Trump’s presidency, but there might be more to it as well.

Then again it might another attempt to Luciferianize society as more and more people begin to notice how dangerously insane these leftist extremists are. Perhaps the globalists want to provoke both the right, and the people in the middle, to go too far in their response. As Nietzsche said: “He who fights too long against dragons becomes a dragon himself; and if you gaze too long into the abyss, the abyss will gaze into you.”

Or rather like Freemason Albert Pike planned already over a hundred years ago in the letter to Giuseppe Mazzini that I’ve written about before: “We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.”

Could this be what is happening? Even if this alleged letter is irrelevant, I do think both sides in these riots were put in place like in a chess-game played by a single player.

The actor Robin Williams died August 11, 2014, allegedly of hanging himself by his belt. I’ve written about this before and I’m skeptical of the suicide story. I’ve said since the beginning I suspect he was murdered, and still do. There are some new developments to Williams’ death, not new in the sense of being recent, but new in relation to my old writings on it.

One minor yet highly significant detail is that Robin Williams died August 11th, and was cremated, according to the media, August 12th, the very next day. Maybe I’m just a lunatic conspiracy nut, but if this is true it screams of cover up. Yet Wikipedia and all media outlets that I found describing when he was cremated point to August 12, 2014.

I’m still a bit incredulous of this claim, especially since all the sources I find regarding Williams’ cremation are dated August 20th or later. There could have been some sort of mix up in the media, such as maybe he was supposed to be cremated on the 21st, not 12th.

New Diagnosis on Robin Williams

Originally Williams’ reason for supposedly committing suicide was depression, and he had been diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease. However, over a year after his death the media began to report that doctors diagnosed that he had actually had Lewy Bodies Dementia. Lewy bodies are “abnormal aggregates of protein that develop inside nerve cells in Parkinson’s disease (PD), Lewy body dementia, and some other disorders” Wikipedia states. Lewy Bodies Dementia, or dementia with Lewy bodies, is a disease whose cause is unknown and has no cure. Some of its symptoms are depression, paranoia and confusion.

In September 2016, the widow of Robin Williams, Susan Schneider Williams, wrote an article of her late husband’s struggle with the disease titled The terrorist inside my husband’s brain. She says she learned three months after the death of her husband after the release of the coroner’s report that he had Lewy body disease. The widow had shown Williams’ medical records to four doctors after his death, and all agree he had “one of the worst pathologies [of Lewy bodies disease] they had seen”. Williams allegedly committed suicide to end his pain.

While all of this could very well be true and there is nothing more to see here, I’m going to suggest an alternative explanation. Lewy bodies dementia/disease causes paranoia and confusion, and Robin Williams had already been diagnosed with Parkinson’s, which is also related to Lewy bodies. Perhaps Robin Williams had a good reason to be paranoid and confused if he was being persecuted by someone, and they had threatened to kill him. Someone could have forged the coroner’s report to make it look like he had Lewy bodies dementia to explain away his paranoia. Williams’ body had already been cremated a long time ago so no-one could double-check it anyway.

Mystery Witness and Investigation Reopened

According to some celebrity gossip websites a private investigator, or a couple of them, were hired to re-investigate Williams’ death. Radar Online notes that the investigator refused to reveal who hired him. Celeb Dirty Laundry suggestss there is evidence pointing to foul play instead of suicide, since two investigators were assigned on the case. Both websites claim that Robin Williams’ massage therapist and another mystery man were present at the scene. Whatever these two men did or saw around the time of the actor’s death have not been made public, according to my understanding.

The two articles are from September and August of 2015, so that’s almost a year and a half ago. I have not found any update on the investigation. Assuming the claims of these websites are correct, the private investigation on the death Robin Williams is either still going on, the investigators are finished but their findings were not made public, or the investigation has been blocked in some way. While it is possible the investigators finished their investigation, found no foul play and reported it to their employer, yet I don’t think so. I want to hear the investigators state it themselves if this is the case.

Celeb Dirty Laundry had published another intriguing article on the aftermath of the death of Robin Williams in June 2015. Supposedly a legal battle between the widow Susan Schneider Williams and Williams’ family, I assume it means his children, had ensued over Williams’ estate. Moreover the article basically presents the widow, Susan, as a parasitical vampire who started isolating her husband from his children and the rest of his family after they got married in 2011. I don’t know to what extent this is true, but it certainly appears there is more to Robin Williams’ death than both the mainstream media or the wanking-obsessed (autoerotic asphyxiation) alternative media have been reporting.

Conclusion

I certainly don’t know what happened to Robin Williams and I am still not saying he was necessarily murdered, yet I do see good reason to suspect he might have been. If indeed he was cremated the day after he died, I would call this pretty damning evidence that some sort of cover-up had been going on. If private investigators were hired to investigate Williams’ death, it certainly suggests I’m not the only who with suspicions on his death. Yet the sources that claim Williams was cremated the day after his death, and the one’s talking about the new investigation are not the most reliable ones. I wonder if we’ll ever hear any updates to this story?