You are here

Why Israelis can burn Palestinians alive and get away with it

“I was on the balcony of my home. I heard Saad screaming, ‘Help me. They’ve killed me,’” explains Ibrahim Dawabsha in a new short documentary produced by the Palestinian human rights group Al-Haq (watch it at the top of this page).

Ibrahim rushed out to find Saad Dawabsha and his wife, Riham, lying on the ground, their bodies on fire.

A masked figure stood near Saad, and another stood near his wife.

Ibrahim carried Saad and then Riham away from their burning home, and then rescued their 4-year-old son Ahmed from inside.

“I took him to my neighbor’s house. The neighbor told me that there was also another child inside the house. His name was Ali. I went back to Saad’s home. At that time, the whole house was on fire.”

While villagers waited for firefighters to arrive, they tried in vain to rescue baby Ali, who perished in the fire.

Violent cell

Six hours before the Dawabsha family home was set ablaze in the occupied West Bank village of Duma on 31 July, Israel’s Channel 2 aired an exposé on a group of settlers who had set fire to the historic Church of the Multiplication of Loaves and Fishes in the Galilee region of present-day Israel.

When they were arrested, Channel 2 reported, the members of the cell admitted that they had set fire to the church as well as to homes and mosques in the West Bank. Investigators found a CD they produced which describes how Arabs can be burned alive: break the windows of a home, throw flammable material into the rooms and set fire to the exits.

“This way Arabs are burned to death,” the instructions assure.

After the Dawabsha home was set on fire, the Israeli military held a press conference outside it.

Al-Haq’s documentary shows an army spokesperson stating, in Arabic, that Israel promises “to arrest those who did this and bring them to justice.”

No one knows the emptiness of such promises more than Hussein Abu Khudair.

His 16-year-old son Muhammad was abducted from outside his Jerusalem home and burned alive in June 2014, hours after a right-wing rally in the city during which protesters chanted “Death to the Arabs.”

“Those who abducted my son had participated in the demonstration, which provided moral support for them to kidnap and set my son Muhammad on fire,” Hussein explains in the documentary.

“For four days, the Israeli police claimed that my son had been killed on grounds of family disputes,” he adds.

“If it had not been for surveillance cameras that documented the abduction and the abductors, the Israeli police would have registered the case against unknown persons.”

“When the judge is your enemy”

The perpetrators of Muhammad’s murder are being brought to trial. But Hussein doesn’t believe that it will bring justice for his family.

“The Israeli judiciary is not impartial. When the judge is your enemy, who can you complain to? The Israeli judiciary is sympathetic to these criminals.”

Hussein insists that the people who killed his son should not have been able to commit the crime in the first place.

“The police cooperated with them in spite of the fact that they should have arrested them before they burned and killed Muhammad,” he says.

One can only imagine that Saad and Riham Dawabsha would say the same about those who murdered 18-month-old Ali.

But Saad died of his injuries one week after the attack, and then Riham succumbed to hers one month later.

Impunity

Nearly two months since the attack, no one has been charged in connection with the crime, though the Israeli government knows who did it.

The Israeli army spokesperson’s promise to catch the Dawabsha family’s killers is cynical enough, given the long history of settlers attacking Palestinians and their crops, homes and places of worship without punishment.

But it is also totally insincere, as the army protects those settlers’ very presence in the West Bank through its violent occupation that robs Palestinians of their most basic rights.

Israel’s army exists in service to the settlers, who are a necessary component of the state’s settler-colony enterprise.

Comments

It had a twofold aim. The first was to rid Europe of an inconvenient minority by transferring them to the Turks. The second, to further weaken the Ottomans by sowing discord and disturbance in their already sick dying empire.

Only after the Russian pogroms did Herzl and his retrograde racist gang sign on to it. It has been down hill ever since. Ethnic cleansings, forced relocations, religious riots, assassinations (including of UN officials), hotel bombings, church burnings. It has been one long stream of terrorist related criminal activity and terrorism.

It has as much to do with Judaism as being a member of the KKK has to do with being a Christian.

It must end. It must join Chattel Slavery, Jim Crow and Apartheid in the ash heap of history.

Theodor Herzl began in Pan-Germanism described by one critic
succinctly:

"According to [this] German theory, people of common descent...
should form one common state. Pan-Germanism was based
on the idea that all persons who were of German race, blood
or descent...owed their primary loyalty to Germany and
should become citizens of the German state, their true
homeland..." (Hans Kohn)

For roots in the Bible as well as the history and development
of Zionism see Michael Prior CM's landmark work
THE BIBLE AND COLONIALISM : A MORAL CRITIQUE.

Works by Lenni Brenner provide solid bases such as in "51 DOCUMENTS".
His book 'THE IRON WALL..." awaits me at the local library.
It is said to deal with the history of revisionism, also covered in
"51 DOCUMENTS".

I basically agree with Prior that roots actually precide the
relatively recent history of Zionism and that it somewhat
misleading to attribute all these many faults to Zionism
alone. As Prior suggested before his death, these issues
have not been dealt with obviously for convenient reasons.
(It is more comfortable for many Jews to blame it all
on Christians, the "Gentiles" , a comforting and flawed
interpretation. (Prior analyzes other examples than
Zionism in his book.)