There are many
surprising and little understood aspects to the size and extent of the House of
David and how it has expanded to cover the nations. It has extended the
Messianic families and incorporated what are basically Hittite lineages.

This paper may be freely copied and distributed provided it
is copied in total with no alterations or deletions. The publisher’s name and
address and the copyright notice must be included.No charge may be levied on recipients of
distributed copies.Brief quotations may
be embodied in critical articles and reviews without breaching copyright.

This paper is available from the World
Wide Web page:http://www.logon.org and http://www.ccg.org

Hittites in the House of
David

In researching the
aspects of the history of nations it became evident just how important the DNA
structure was to the identity of the nations and their distribution and
interrelationship.

The Sons of Noah were
outlined in their respective branches of Shem, Ham and Japheth. The Bible story
fits perfectly into the YDNA structure and explains perfectly the spread of
humans and their origin. In fact it makes a complete nonsense of the Theory of
Evolution once the correct time frames of the mutations are taken into account.

It is those mutations
that in fact become obvious and relevant to understanding the YDNA mutations in
the House of David. That DNA includes what is in fact Hittite YDNA that merged
into the Davidic lineage in the Tenth century BCE.

When the writer was
researching his YDNA some strange things happened with the results. There were
a series of two, three and four step mutations that occurred that spread over
both Europe and Asia and the Middle East. The first 12 sections were tested and
led to a broad spectrum match with a number of groups of people. What was of
interest was the number of three step mutation matches with Levites among
Russian and Lithuanian Jews extending from Haplogroup
(Hg.) R1b even into Haplogroup (Hg.) N in Lithuania.

What was to prove
somewhat enigmatic was a three-step match with a Palestinian of Hg. RxR1 basic.
This match was to prove relevant to later finds.

There were mutational
matches also as far as Siberia and into Spain with a family also in Cuba,
probably coming from Spain.

These finds were
somewhat at odds with the fact that my YDNA was a known sub group of the Norse
Celt range and extended all over Britain into the Scottish Isles of the
Shetlands and the Orkneys and into Denmark Iceland and, strangely enough, into
the European admixture of the Greenland Eskimos.

The explanation of
that is fairly easy and of itself solved a long standing riddle of the Norse.
We knew that at the early part of the Mediaeval Warm Period Greenland became
ice free in summer and could be farmed. This view was put to the test when Eric
the Red became involved in heated discussion in a banquet in Thule (now
Iceland) in 996 and killed another and more powerful Thane. He took the road of
discretion and loaded up the family and rowed to Greenland. The family settled
it for the next 450 years and went on to colonise the
northern areas of North America. It was thought that the Eskimos had wiped them
out as it became colder in the recent Ice Age from 1450-1760 CE. From the DNA
tests it appears that the family had not been wiped out at all. They simply
joined the Eskimos and adapted to the colder conditions and are still there to
this day.

The standard
Evolutionary explanation of the Norse Celts is that they came in from the
Middle East tens of thousands of years ago and settled North West Europe with a
group also in what is Eastern Germany.

The problem is that
that does not fit with what is known of British history and the ancient
records.

The historical records
show that the early inhabitants of Britain were a group of Magogites
that came in from what is now the area of the Black Sea and who were termed
Scythians. The original Irish were also described as coming in from that region
of Greece/Thrace and Scythia. These people in Britain were subjugated by a
group of Hittites from the kingdom of Wilusia, according
to the early British Historians. Their capital at Troy was destroyed by the
Hellenic alliance in the Trojan War. Troy fell in the year 1054 BCE, which was
the last two years of the rule of Eli as judge in Israel, and the Irish
histories denote this fact (see MacGeoghegan-Mitchell,
The History of Ireland, Sadlier & Co., 1868, Chapters 2ff.).

This was the beginning
of the destruction of the Hittite Empire which continued on until the Assyrians
had eradicated them as the Hittite Empire and assumed their place.

In Britain these
people assumed control from the Tenth century BCE. They repelled an invasion by
the Huns in the Tenth century under the Hun king Humber who was defeated and
killed at the Humber River named after him. The Hittite Trojan Cymry continued in control for the next fourteen hundred
years with conflict between them and the Picts in the
North until the Anglo-Saxons came into Britain following the Jutes after the
retirement of the Romans. For many centuries they traded with the Middle East
and the Phoenicians and from them they received exposure to Judah and its
merchants.

It is from this
lineage that we see some very interesting developments. It is also probably the
origin of the similar YDNA structure that we were to find among some Middle
East people in some surprising places.

An example of this was
the sequence of testing to determine the origins of the YDNA of the Cox family
of Surrey that was to lead to a very interesting development.

The initial testing
graded the lineage as Norse Celts at R1b1c which was later rearranged in the
R1b Haplogroup structure as R1b1b and then with
further testing to R1b1b2a1a4 from the 67 DYS sequence to the U106 group
positive at the L48.

Contact with others in
this group saw the assertion made that the YDNA link was of the House of David
in Judah and many of the group were Jews from Israel and from Spain.

This of course was
understood to be impossible. However, the contact alleged that to be true.
These lineages were stated to be demonstrable genealogically.

This view coincided
with those expressed by another earlier match with an old British family who
claimed that they were Sephardi Jews persecuted in
the 1205 persecutions in Britain and driven underground.

This investigation was
to lead to some startling findings in relation to the House of David and its
YDNA structure.

Hg. R in the House of David

Most people who know
anything about YDNA will agree that Hg. R is a non-Semitic YDNA and stems in
biblical terms from the Sons of Japheth. It is without doubt concentrated in
the North of Europe and Asia and is related also to the Hg. Q Amerindians that
also stemmed from the Hg. P ancestor which in turn is descended from the Hg. K
ancestral link, which is linked to the Phoenicians and separate from the Hg. I
and J ancestral Hebrew links. If David was anything he would have been an IJ
Hebrew.

On being confronted
with the amazing contentions of these Jews that claimed lineage from David yet
were the U106 group linked to the R1b sub structure further research yielded
the most amazing finds.

It was shown that at
least two major lines of the house of David were in fact Hg. R. Most were R1b
but one was in fact R1a and all were stated to be mutated significantly from
one another.

Such a discovery makes
a complete nonsense of the theory of Evolution and destroys the premises of the
time frames of YDNA mutation.

For these people to be
related from a single ancestor they had to be descended from an RxR1 basic
ancestor that married into the Davidic Royal line and be absorbed into the
genealogical structure just after David. In other words they had to have
married one of David’s daughters or female line. This is quite possible
genealogically as the genealogies in Judah do not mention females and the lines
take the husband’s name even if a descent is taken in the female line. Only
rarely are females mentioned. This fact is evidenced by the genealogy in Luke
chapter 3 which ends with Joseph son of Heli but is
widely known and acknowledged by Judah that the lineage in Luke 3 is that of
Mariam the mother of Christ and the genealogy in Matthew chapter 1 is that of
Joseph through Jeconiah or Coniah.

What has happened is
that two of the major lines in the Royal House of David in Judah are descended
from Celts who could only have come in to Judah in prominence after the fall of
the Hittite empire in the north and this had to have been subsequent to the
fall of Troy in 1054 BCE. There is only one Hittite famous enough and powerful
enough to have entered the family of David and indeed David forced that
situation himself.

The man was one of the
Thirty of Israel and David had him killed to take his wife. That man was Uriah
the Hittite and his wife was Bathsheba the mother of Solomon.

The Bible is silent on
the matter of Bathsheba having a son or sons previously and she is simply
presented as losing the first child to David and then bearing Solomon. However
the law of God speaks volumes regarding the requirement for Uriah to have had
the opportunity to produce offspring by his wife before he was employed in
battle. That he had done so is also evidenced by the fact that he was not
concerned to do so when he returned to Jerusalem. He did not cohabit with
Bathsheba when it was in fact desired and planned that he have the opportunity
to do so.

That Bathsheba had the
opportunity to marry her son into the House of David is beyond dispute. She was
the favourite wife of the king and the mother of the
king designate, namely Solomon, and all Israel knew it. The best way for her to
place her son by Uriah into the Royal House was by having him marry one of
David’s daughters by another wife and there is no question of incest involved.

It therefore follows
as a matter of logic that such a union would have produced Hittite Hg. R YDNA into
the genealogy of David.

For the presence of
R1b and also a small amount of R1a YDNA it has to be assumed that the original
YDNA had to be RxR1 Basic. Thus after 900 BCE the YDNA split into R1B and then
further mutated into an R1a offshoot. The fact that such YDNA is found in the
most powerful Davidic clans in Judah is evidence of this scenario.

It is therefore a
matter of fact that this YDNA is of itself a marker of the Hittite lines in the
Royal House of David through one of David’s daughters. It is a most powerful
argument that the royal line of David was extended to the gentiles and that
salvation was and is of the Gentiles and that this line is of the line of David
and Uriah the Hittite through Bathsheba. It is unlikely to have been by a
marriage with Solomon’s daughters, as that was prohibited by biblical law.

That line of R1b YDNA
is now amongst the Britons. The fact is further attested by the genealogical
understanding that a major element of this YDNA is derived from the family name
or word meaning son of Isaac (i.e.
Cox). Other families are linked to this YDNA in England and also in Spain and
elsewhere.

This same YDNA extends
to Scotland and into the Shetlands, and to Iceland and to Denmark. It is widely
dispersed.

The tendency is to sit
on the discovery rather than offend the scientists with their pet theories
based on evolutionary theory and mutation cycles or the families involved. It
is far too important a discovery to allow that to happen.

The House of David among the British
and its impact on the Celtic Church

Another ancestor was called Bran the
Blessed. He was asserted by the historians/genealogists to be the son-in-law of
Joseph of Aramathaea, and his wife Anna was asserted
to be the cousin of the Virgin Mariam and one of the Desposyni.
Thus all this family and their offspring are Desposyni
or the Family of Jesus Christ.The
mention by Geoffrey of Monmouth that Marius, alleged son of Arviragus,
married the daughter of Bran the Blessed is a confusion of name as Marius was
the Latinised form of Arviragus in its short form Meurig. It was Arviragussnr. that married the daughter of Bran the Blessed.
Geoffrey says he lived in Rome for a time. Their son Coel
married the daughter of Cyllin, son of Caradog, his second cousin. That is also our family line.
The problem is discussed in Mike Ashley, Mammoth Book of British Kings and
Queens, Carroll and Graf,
1999, p. 78).

Caradog was a Briton of the Cantii (40 CE), the Catuvellauni and Silures (43-51)
that fought the Romans. He was first defeated in Kent. His son or brother (or
perhaps son/nephew) Togodumnos was killed at the head
of a second army somewhere in Hampshire. Togodumnos
is thought to have been the Chief of the Dumnoniae of
Devon and Cornwall (i.e. Tog y Dymnaint whose real
name may have been Guiderius, although it is
suggested as Arviragus the elder also).

The Emperor Claudius, with the army under AulusPlautius, captured Caradog and Arviragus after the
great defeat in Wales, and his betrayal by Cartimandua
of the MagogiteBrigantes
of what is now Lancashire. Claudius took the whole family in chains to Rome. Caradog literally talked his way out of being executed
(strangled after a Roman Triumph) and was spared along with the family. He and
the whole family were baptised under the Apostle Paul. His son Linus seems to have already been baptised by the Apostles
and, according to Hippolytus, Linus
was appointed one of the Seventy. He became the first bishop of Rome (see the
paper Origin of the Christian Church in Britain (No. 266)). He
would thus have gone to Canaan with the father of his aunt Anna, namely Joseph,
at the time of Christ. Joseph was understood to be a trader in metals with
Britain.

After Caradog (or
lat.Caratacus) died, reportedly poisoned at
the same time as Claudius in 54 CE, Cyllin and Coel, his son-in-law and family, returned to Britain to
take up the work commenced by Aristobulus, bishop of
Britain and one of the Seventy (this group of the Seventy being sent out from Rome).
The family became subjects, or client leaders in Britain, of the Romans and
were able to consolidate the Church. Linus was
martyred in Rome along with many of the early Church.

So, we can deduce that even though Caradog and the Britons did not want the Romans there and
many died to prevent it, the opportunity was used by God to further establish
the Church in Britain and northern Gaul. Paul was able to use Caradog’s family, including that of Arviragus,
to establish the Church both in Rome and in Britain. Rome was used to
consolidate Britain and prepare it for the years ahead where the Reformation
would occur and then later the message of the Last Days would be promulgated
from its people who were to be spread worldwide. The Celts were able to withstand
the paganism of Rome and remain free Christians for centuries.

The Church established Sabbatarian
Christianity in Britain and planted it in France against great opposition.

This history was well known but the
Trinitarians from Rome went to great lengths to disguise and corrupt the
stories and to discredit their veracity after 664 CE when their doctrines were
forced on Britain at the point of a sword. There will be one final attempt to
destroy God’s people but it will fail (for the previous attempts see also the
paper The Virgin Mariam and the Family of Jesus Christ (No. 232)).

The Extent of the Lineage in Britain

To give an idea of the
extent of the Family of Christ in Britain and the Commonwealth the following
lineage will demonstrate the extent of the dispersion.

The lineage is son of
Ewart William, s. of William Charles, s. of Thomas (Thomas William Martyn Cox of Surrey and Sydney) s. of Thomas Joseph Cox of
Surrey m. Emma Martyn Stocker d. of William Martyn Stocker, son of Joseph Stocker and Mary Martyn of Broadclyst in Devon.
The Stockers of Broadclyst came there from Winchester
and their line goes back to a Thane in the court of Alfred the Great. They too
were an ancient British family that shared in this heritage. Winchester was the
capital in ancient times.

Mary Martyn wife of Joseph Stocker was the daughter of William Martyn of Broadclyst. The name
William Martyn became a genealogical marker to the
family and we will now stay with this line for the next eight centuries until
we leave the Norman Conquests and go into Wales and the ancient British
lineages. Some of the offshoots will be mentioned because they indicate the
extent of the reach of the bloodlines and their diversity.

William was the son of
Anthony Martyn and Elizabeth Voysey
of Broadclyst. The Voyseys
are the offshoots of the baronial house of Vesci. Voysey is the Devonian (Dumnonian)
rendering of the name Vesci. They were clerks of the
parish of Broadclyst forover two hundred years, commencing with
Clement Voysey, when the parish records were first
opened. Their line also married into the Veales of Cornwall descended from
William Veale cousin of Christopher from the Gloucester Veales and also the
Tuckers. They are of our lines (The
Knights of Gloucester). The Veales possess a
Merovingian lineage, as does any family marrying into them.They also trace back to Harding of Denmark
and Eadnoth the Staller,
steward to Edward the Confessor.

Anthony Martyn was the son of Edward s. of John, s. of Anthony, s.
of Anthony, s. of John, s. of Richard, s. of William.

The Martyns held lands in Dorset and Devon and William’s widow
resided in Clyst House.The merchant sons were in Exeter and London
or at Athelhampton.

The Martyn lineage from William Martyn
goes back then to William Martyn of Kemys (or Chemais) in Pembrokeshire and is fairly well known although often
confused by Mormon genealogy. The Martyn family of
the Southwest based in Devon is now quite extensive worldwide.

The division of Martyns at Athelhampton in Dorset
came from the lineage of Nicholas Martyn s. of
William Martyn. This lineage from the early Britons
and the Desposyni also went to the line of the Spencers and thus is also found in Sir Winston Churchill,
the Earls Spencer and Princess Diana and thus with Princes William and Harry.

The demarcation from
the Martyns into the Welsh lines came from the
grandparents of Nicholas Martyn. His father was
Nicolas Martyn, son of William Martyn,
son of Robert Fitz Martyn, son of Baron Martyn of Tours Lords of Kemys in
Pembrokeshire. Martyn of
Tours married Geva de Burci,
d. of Serlo de Burci of the
Norman conquests. She married again to a William of Falaise
but most of the lands devolved on the son Robert FitzMartyn.
From him Fitz Martyn became the surname of the line
shortening to Martyn.

Nicholas’ wife was
Maud De Brien(ne) daughter ofEve (Eva)
De Tracy and Guy de Brien descendant of Jean de Brienne
of Jerusalem and HRE m. BerengeriaInfanta d. of Alphonse and Berengaria of Castile. Eve was
the daughter of Henry de Tracy of Barnstaple in
Devon.

The Martyn lines split into two main lines and then into
extensive sub lines many of which were not properly recorded before the church
records began in Devon.

The senior William Martyn married Angharadverch (or ferch) Rhys princess of
Wales and from there we go back to the Ancient British.

The Welsh Connection

The line in Wales from
Angharad (also Angarad) verch (d. of) Rhys Prince of South Wales and King of Deheubarth (b. ca. 1132 Ireland, d. 28 April 1197 at 65
years) is as follows below. From Rhys ap (son of) Gruffydd the entire Tudor dynasty sprung with a massive
extension into England. This line was descended from Llywarch
of Dyfed through Elen who married HywelDdaapCadell,
ap Rhodri Mawr (m. Angarad) (see Ashley M.,ibid, p. 331; Ashley’s numbers and references have been retained to
enable easy cross reference to the book and its biographical information).

The line through HywelDda is Rhys ap Griffith ap Rhys apTewderapCadellapEinion, apOwain,
apHywelDda (m. ElenverchLlywarch of Dyfed, see below) apCadell, ap Rhodri Mawr (m. AngharadverchMeurig). These two lines
from the females are of importance also as Angharad
was descended through her father Meurig from the sons
of Cunedda through Ceredig
(Ashley chart 4, p. 140).

Rhodri was the son of MerfynapEssyllt
(m. Gwirad (Ashley NA8), apCynanap Rhodri. Cynan also had a putative line across to the line of Caradog (Ashley ibid., ED 14) of the sons of OwainapEinion
and brother to CadwallonapEinionapCunedda.

Tybion(whose
line was of Mierionydd); Edern,
Rhuton, Dunant (whose line was of Dunoding),
Einion (whose line was of GwyneddRhos); Dogfael, Ceredig (whose line was Ceredigion); Osfael
and Afloeg.

The offspring of Cunedda that ruled in Gwent and Glywysing
are included in Ashley ibid, on p. 122. That chart includes rulers of Ergyng and Brittany.

Cunedda married Gwawl
daughter of Coel Hen whose lines went to the Celts of
the North as well as Wales and his line also passed to the line of Oswy of Northumbria in his
marriage to Rhiainmelt d. of RhoethapRhunapUrienapCinmarcapMerchiaunapGurgustapCeneuapCoel Hen.

Coel Hen married Ystradwal
daughter of CadafaapCynanapEudaf,
who is descended from CoelapCadfan. It was Cadfanwho married Gwladys
d. of Lucius, apCoel I.Coel married the daughter of Cyllin
son of Caratacus (Caradog)
who was captured by the Romans with his brother Arviragus
and their families and taken to Rome. His son Linus
the brother of Cyllin was one of the Seventy and the
first bishop of Rome being appointed by the Apostle Paul. Much has been done to
undermine this record by the Roman Church (see also the paper Origin of the Christian Church in
Britain (No. 266)). The third son Guiderius
is thought to have possibly been the Togidumnus
killed by the Romans in the Southwest of Britain.Some assert that Coel
Hen was of the tribe of the Brigantes, but if so he
was a Magogite. The other and more likely assertion
is that he was of the Votadini. John Morris asserts
he was Dux Bellorum
(War Duke) of Britain but according to Ashley this is not proven (ibid. p. 97).

Caratacus was the son of CunobelinapTasciovanus.

Arviragus brother of Caratacus
(which is his Romanised name) had a son named Meurig (called Marius by the Romans) who married the
daughter of Prasutagus king of the Iceni and husband of Boudica (who
led the revolt of the Iceni against the Romans after
they had raped her and her daughter. She and the Iceni
burnt Colchester, the then capital). Her line is putative from AntediosapAddedormarusbut
but is certain from their ancestors MandubraciusapImanuentus.

The line of Arviragus and LuciusapCoel I is also descended from
Bran the Blessed and extends also to another line of the British through CereticapCynloypapCinhilapCursalemapFerap Confer apCunedd to Coel
son of Cadfan and Glwadys
daughter of LuciusapCoel I.

The line of Coel Hen (probably old King Cole of the nursery rhyme), who
married Ystradwal of this line, was descended from
Bran through his son Beli and his son Amalech (Avallach) through Amalech’s son Eudelen.

Gwawl daughter of Coel Hen
married Cunedda who was also descended from Bran
through Amalech as follows:

CuneddaapEdernapPaternusap Tacit apCeinapGuoceinapDoliapGuordoliapDyfwnapGurdumnapAmgualoytapAngeuritapOumunapDyfwnapBrithgueinapEugeinapAmalechapBeliap Bran the Blessed apLlyr (king Lear) (m. PenardunverchLludapBeliMawr (ruling Britain ca 100 BCE)). King Lear (the
character of Shakespeare) was the son of CaswallonapBeliMawr
and thus Lear and Pernadun were cousins.

It was Arviragus chief of the Silurians
that gave the twelve hides of land to the Church at the request of Joseph and
his nephew LinusapCaradog to build the church at Glastonbury. Thus my/our
ancestors founded the church in Britain with Aristobulus
bishop of Britain and also one of the Seventy with Linus.
The daughter of Cyllin and the son of Meurig (Marius) son of Arviragusi. e. Coel I returned to Britain
from Rome and established the church with their son Lucius
and his son Cadfan (m. Gwladys).

The genealogical
charts and maps of the Celtic tribes have been drawn up and are listed on the
Abraham’s Legacy site.

Bran the Blessed is
termed “the Blessed” because of his relationship and his marriage. He married
Anna the daughter of Joseph of Aramathaea.Joseph was the uncle of the Virgin Mariam and the great uncle of Jesus
Christ. He was a descendant of the Royal House of David and a member of the
Sanhedrin and his lineage was understood to be that in Luke chapter 3.

It thus follows (no
matter how much it is argued) that the descendants of Bran the Blessed in
Britain are the Desposyni and are the Family of Christ and that is why so much
effort was made after the synod of Whitby in 664 CE
to destroy the records of the lines and discredit the understanding by the
Roman Church both in Britain and in Europe. This was done by both the Roman
Church and the Anglo-Saxons, and the Normans after them, for reasons of power
and control of religion. However, the activities of Joseph are enshrined in the
legends and songs of the ancient British.

Fortunately, as can be
seen from these lineages they have now permeated virtually every one of the families
of Britain. One would have to virtually exterminate every Anglo-Celt in the
British Commonwealth and the USA to get rid of the family of Christ.

They would then have
to start on France and Northern Germany to eliminate them. However, the Royal
families of Europe have been penetrated by the lines of the Royal House of
David. The Merovingians brought the line in and
spread it throughout Europe.

So also it extended in
the “Fisher kings” of the Scandinavians and came in with the Norse.

The Merovingian line
with its Davidic lineage was also brought to England in many forms and we can
see that it also runs in the Veales of Cornwall and Gloucester as well as in
the lines of the Plantagenets to Henry II and subsequently from above as do
those of the Fisher kings above. These lines were also spread throughout
Britain.

The Celts in Scotland

The kingdom of Strathclyde was formed from the line of Coel
to Cynloyp and his son Ceretic.
There was also a putative line to Tutagul (Ashley
DA2).

Ceretic produced two lines, the major line being
through Cinuit. The main line of Cinuit
came through Dumnagual. His four sons were Clinoch (FB4) Cinbelin (DA 22) Garwynwyn and Inganach (m. Brychan) and their son lluan
married Gabrhain and they married into and produced
the DalRiata Scots in
Ireland from Ulster and in Scotland from the Irish connection (see below).

Thus the lineages of
the British went to Ireland from Strathclyde and
returned from Ireland to the British Celts and Scots in what is now Wales and
England and Scotland.

Extension of the Celtic Church in
Ireland

My Irish lineage is of
the clan of Geohegan of Meath
and Kings County from my mother Sylvia d. of William Padget
son of James Padget m. Jane Geohegan
d. of William Geohegan of Kiama,
s. of Laurence Geohegan of Scarborough England great greatgreat grandson of Charles Geoghegan of Ireland direct descendant of Eohegan or “Little Horse”, 3rd son of Neill of
the Nine Hostages. The lineage is on the Abrahams Legacy site at www.abrahams-legacy.org/geoghegans.html.

The lineage of Neill
is important because at least 5% of the entire population of Ireland is
directly descended from him, not to mention the Scots and many English families
who are also descended from his ancestors as well. Thus an incredible number of
Irish share this lineage and, as we will see, also a relationship to the House
of David.

Neill was a warrior in Ireland who had a
number of wives and concubines. He was declared High King in Ireland at Tara.
He invaded Britain and renamed Alba as Scotland, after the Milesian
ancestress Scota. The original Scota
was a princess of the 18thAhmosid dynasty
of Egypt and she, with her husband Niul and her son GaodhalGlas (from whom the Gadelians are named), crossed the Red Sea with Moses in the
Mixed Multitude. Niul had been given the land of
Campus Cyrunt and the pharaoh’s daughter’s hand in
marriage because of his efforts in the Nubian wars in the South. Their loyalty
to Israel saw them persecuted by Egypt and they had to leave the lands given to
them by the preceding pharaoh.

To return to Neill of the Nine Hostages,
his family had established the DalRiata Scots as we will see below.

After invading Britain, Neill then invaded
Europe and was almost responsible for expelling the Romans from Gaul. He took
200 captives in chains to Ireland. He himself was later murdered by the son of
the king of Leinster. One of the 200 slaves/prisoners was a man named Patrick
of Tours, nephew or son of Martyn of Tours (accounts
vary depending on denomination; the Martyn line of
Devon above is also descended from this family in the Norman Conquest of 1066
with Baron Martyn of Tours). Patrick paid Neill back
by converting his great great grandson to the
Christian Faith. That grandson was named (in the English) Columba. He became
the great Sabbatarian Saint Columba of Iona and went on to consolidate the
Christian Faith among the Irish Celts and Scots. He was the greatest
Sabbatarian Churchman of the Celts. He went on to train those such as Aiden of
Lindisfarne and the Sabbatarian Church was developed further through them, even
though the councils saw the Celtic Church falter and virtually go underground
after 664 CE at Whitby.

Neill had no idea that what he was doing would
change Ireland forever. God used them all for a purpose. Columba got on with
the Faith even though he no doubt would have been more powerful and wealthy
with a sword in his hand, but not more lastingly famous. He prophesied his own
death on the Sabbath.

The
Milesian Ancestry of the DalRiata Scots and of the O’Neills
and of Dyfed

The kings of DalRiata take their ancestry
from the MilesianFedlimid
(T118).

The two major lines of
his were of the sons Fiachu and Conn. The ancestral
chart is at Ashley ibid., p. 194 (chart 8).

The line that married
into the British and became the Welsh line is from Fiachu
down to Elen who married HywelDda (EB15; EC23) (Ashley chart 17). The line of the
Irish O’Neills and Geoghegans
is from Conn and his son Art.

The line back from Elen is Elen v. Llywarch (EC21) of Dyfed (Brother of Rhodri (EC22) apHyfaidd (EC20) apTangwystyl (m. Bledri) apOwain
(EC18) (Brother of Rhain (EC17) father of Tryffin (EC19).

Fedlimid of Ireland’sother son Conn (T120) produced the lines of Art (T122) and Saraid who married Conair (T122) apMoglama.

The descendants of Saraid and Conair were Corbred
(Q40) f. of Eochaid (T126) f. of Athirco
(Q829), Findacher (Q831), Thrinkind
(Q834?) Romaich (Q836), Angus (Q837) f. of Eochaid, f. of Erc who was the
father of Loarn, Fergus (FC1) and Angus.

Loarn was father of Muirdach
and Fergus was father of Domangart. From these two
the DalRiata Scots were
descended (see Ashley Charts 8 & 9, pp. 194 and 195).

The importance of this
lineage from Fedlimid was that the prophet Jeremiah
had taken the throne princess from Judah and placed the lineage in Ireland
amongst the Tuatha de Danaan.
When the Milesians invaded and came to rule in
Ireland this line also passed into the Milesian kings
and thus, from our ancestor Fedlimid, the Davidic
lineage spread not just into the DalRiata Scots but also into the houses of Dyfed. From there
it went into Wales and hence the lineages above. Also it went into Northumbria. It also went into the O’Neill’s and into the Geoghegans (and the Higgins and the other families
descended from Niall). These lineages were through the line of Art (T122) ap Conn. Art was the brother of Saraid,
ancestress of the DalRiata
(this aspect will be examined in more detail in the paper at part D, Jeremiah and the House of David (No. 67D)).

The Tuatha De Danaan also, as a group
of people, moved in large numbers into Britain and in their lines also brought
the early lineages of the House of David over among their Haplogroup
I Israelites who intermarried with the British Celts in significant numbers and
then into the Anglo-Saxons. This union is the basis of the union of Ephraim and
Dan in prophecy as the new Joseph (see the paper Genetic Origin of the
Nations (No. 265)).

The lineage from Art ap Conn apFedlimid
was Cormac Mac Art (T125) to his sons Cairbre (T127) to Fiacha (T128)
to Muirdach (T130) to Eochaid
(T132) to Niall (T134).

Three of Neill’s sons
were Loeguire (T136) (father of Crimthan)
and also Eogan and Conall. Eogan was father of Murtagh by Erc daughter of Loarn of the DalRiata. She also had a son by ConallapNiell
and their son Fedlimid was the father of Colum Cille or St Columba of Iona who was cousin to the Geoghegan and O’Neill lines.

The Lion of Judah is
featured on the shield of the Geoghegans and is a Red
lion with Geoghegan but the lion appears as a Blue
and also a Green Lion on other Milesian Clans. The
arms of Geoghegan is a shield argent (silver) with a
lion rampant gules (red) and three red hands (of Ulster) one in each of the
corners of the shield.

MurtaghapMuirdachapEogan
was father to Domnal (T142) from whom the O’Neill
kings of Ireland were descended. He also fathered Baetan
(T145) whom, through his granddaughter Finaverch Colman (T151) passed the lineages into Northumbria by marriage to Oswy
(L16) (see Ashley chart 15).

Thus the link went
from the British Celts in Strathclyde to Ireland and
back again as a double link from Ireland into Scotland and Wales as well as Northumbria and on into England generally.

The Davidic lineages
are all over the British Isles and throughout the Commonwealth and the USA in a
multitude of families who all take their names from one or more of these
ancestors. The lines came in from five (and in fact six) directions as we can
see from above.

The traditional old
and imperfectly described route was via Jeremiah and the throne princess
daughter of Zedekiah to Ireland and from thence to Scotland, England and Wales.
Thus the overturning was in three directions not just in a sequence of three as
explained by the “British Israelites” as we will see from Part D.

The second method was
via the Desposyni and the family of Christ from the marriage of Bran the
Blessed to Anna daughter of Joseph of Aramathaea. This avenue became very
widespread and much has been done to discredit it. This line established
Christianity in Britain and Northern Gaul.

The third avenue was
via the French lineages from the Merovingians who
also trace the lineage back to Antenor I king of the
Cimmerians ca 500 BCE. These are the vestiges of the Wilusian
Hittites from Troy also, hence Cymry or Cimmerians.
They had deliberately introduced the Davidic Line through arranged
intermarriage.

The fourth entry was
via the Israelites of the Northern tribes who had intermingled with the
Anglo-Saxons in Parthia and came in under Odin and intermingled with the
original British who were both Riphathian and Magogite Celts as were the Anglo-Saxons themselves. The
distinctions are in the YDNA haplogroups but
intermarriage has destroyed any separation of people completely.

The fifth method was
through the entry of the Sephardic Jews into Britain from the beginning and
from their intermarriage especially after the persecutions of 1205.

Our family has all
five (plus) links.

The House of David is
extensive throughout the British Commonwealth and the USA and much of it is
through the female lineages. It is all pervasive and impossible to now
differentiate except by isolating the YDNA but that cannot eradicate the fact
of the mtDNA cross-breeding also. The YDNA lines in Judah show a Hittite Celt
ancestor but that cannot alter the fact of massive Davidic interbreeding.

The message is that
salvation is now of the Gentiles and will continue en masse.q