Take action for Liberty each and every day.
Support an open press. Teknosis' continued operation and existence crucially depends on your informative contributions, donation or paying forward, partnering with or purchase of items advertised here. Thank you.

The Credential Investigation, launched by our office in August 2001, recently requested APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS for all BOP personnel going back 10 years -- the discovery window authorized by 18 USC 1961(5).

Not a single credential was disclosed, and every one of those FOIA Requests is now PAST DUE and also IN DEFAULT.

The Act of Congress at 5 USC 5507 bars federal officers from being paid, if they have not executed valid U.S. OPM Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS.

Making matters worse, the electronic SF-61 published at OPM's Internet website is a known COUNTERFEIT: no OMB control number; no expiration date; no citation to 5 USC 2903 (Authority to administer); and the misleading claim"Prior editions not usable" when the only valid SF-61s pre-date August 2002.

Many of those SF-61s were also "administered" by HR assistants not authorized to do so by 5 USC 2903.

This whole mess is rendered even more serious by the Oath of Office Clause in the organic U.S. Constitution, which pre-dates the Bill of Rights and has never been amended.

The Credential Investigation, launched by our office in August 2001, recently requested APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS for all BOP personnel going back 10 years -- the discovery window authorized by 18 USC 1961(5).

Not a single credential was disclosed, and every one of those FOIA Requests is now PAST DUE and also IN DEFAULT.

The Act of Congress at 5 USC 5507 bars federal officers from being paid, if they have not executed valid U.S. OPM Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS.

Making matters worse, the electronic SF-61 published at OPM's Internet website is a known COUNTERFEIT: no OMB control number; no expiration date; no citation to 5 USC 2903 (Authority to administer); and the misleading claim"Prior editions not usable" when the only valid SF-61s pre-date August 2002.

Many of those SF-61s were also "administered" by HR assistants not authorized to do so by 5 USC 2903.

This whole mess is rendered even more serious by the Oath of Office Clause in the organic U.S. Constitution, which pre-dates the Bill of Rights and has never been amended.

There are many people and quite a few physicians who believe Hillary has Parkinson’s and the leading cause of death for those suffering with this disease is aspiration pneumonia. So this is one report from the NY Times that I could believe.

FD:Pneunomia--due to aspirating fluid into the lungs due to loss of motor control of throat/swallowing muscles (seen as frequent long dry cough and choking spells)--is the leading cause of death in Parkinsons disease, which Hillary was diagnosed with before 2012.

In re: Hillary Clinton laughing and having no regrets about fostering ISIS in Libya and hence the untold deaths of tens of thousands of human beings, Muslims or otherwise, in Iraq, Libya, Syria (Middle East), Europe as well as those in the United States, including that which happened in Benghazi (that she tried to blame on some psyop, false flag video that denigrated Mohammed). I had referenced the clip of Hillary's laughing re: Qadhafi's extrajudicial execution and through further research had found a video clip of an interview between Chris Wallace and Hillary on YouTube that showed she had no regrets. I was sharing those links on different occasions on Facebook and elsewhere and on the last occasion that I did I had followed the link of the latter and found out that it had been taken down for content violation because more than likely some Hillary supporter(s) complained to YouTube in that the particular clip was making her look very bad. After that I couldn't find this "no regrets" clip on YouTube or on the entire internet (and still can't) but it happens that I was just now able to reference the actual transcript of the October 23, 2011 Chris Wallace/Hillary Clinton interview on a Hillary supporters blog, further research led me to find it on the U.S. Department of State's website! So here is the information again, minus the actual video in question (because it seems to have been scrubbed from the entire internet):

QUESTION: Secretary, let’s turn if we can to Libya. The UN and human rights groups are calling for an investigation, saying that if, as it appears from the videotape, that Qadhafi was executed, it was a war crime. And you’re also coming under fire for what you said:

(Clip played) SECRETARY CLINTON (in a state of mirth and laughter) We came, we saw, he died!

QUESTION: Question. Do you regret what you said, Secretary?

SECRETARY CLINTON: No.

QUESTION: And if I may, do you regret what you said, and do you feel Qadhafi was wronged or that he got what was coming to him?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, let’s have an investigation. I fully support the United Nations investigation, and I fully support the Transitional National Council’s own call for an independent investigation. I support it on the merits because it’s important to find the facts, and I support it as part of what will be a challenging transition process.

The Transitional National Council today is going to declare the liberation of Libya. They are then going to announce a new government. They need to make it clear that it will be a government to unify the country, to seek reconciliation, to make everyone who supported the former regime – as long as they don’t have blood on their hands – feel safe and included in a new Libya. And so from my perspective, I think such an investigation would be very important to establish accountability, rule of law, and pave the way for the inclusive democratic future that the Libyans tell me they want.

QUESTION: Secretary, do you regret what you said?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I’m not going to comment on that. We didn’t even know what was happening at that time because it was an unconfirmed report.

___

No, lying and very pathetic, Hillary, this was the unconfirmed report of Qadhafi's "capture" which WAS NOT being played back for you in this interview and to which the question wasn't referring:

And this is the one that was actually played back to you in this interview asking if you regretted what you said, and yet you continue dissemble and show that you do not regret it and refer to something else entirely on that same occasion, and yet you want to be the leader of the free world:

'A major failure of the Trump campaign and the Bernie Sanders campaign,' he [Assange] said Friday, is that 'Hillary Clinton tried to run on her having judgment and experience in the State Department.'

'Later on, those campaigns – too late in the process, in my view – started picking up that the experience was mostly a bad experience.'

'So for exampe, Libya: We published 1,700 emails about her involvement in Libya. Benghazi is just a small part of that.'

'She was the leading architect, the leading political force driving to destroy the Libyan state,' Assange said.

“The generals in the Pentagon, not all of them, but a number, were pushing strongly the Libyan State should not be destroyed because radical jihadi groups would move in and take it over, which they did.” And, of course, Assange said the most damaging information was yet to come. But I thought it was interesting that he didn’t focus on the memos that showed pay for play, that patterns that had come out, that had been released by Reuters when they had to sue to get this information, to look at her schedule, correlate that. But he focused on the tick-tock menu, and what this does as he pointed out in that clip. This is something that has been sitting here, not used by Sanders, not used by the Trump campaign, she was working to put herself out there as the driving force behind Libya and this was of course before Libya blew up in everbodys faces, before Libya set the Middle East on fire, and Benghazi, with arming ISIS, with the Syrian civil war. And this is what the Tick-Tock menu says. This is an article from DC Whispers which says: They say the tick-tock e-mail outlines how Hillary Clinton did the bidding of her Saudi masters and turned Libya into an ISIS hellhole. Well, we all know that it’s an ISIS hellhole and we do know she does the bidding of her Saudi masters but their just part of a larger coalition of donors, that would also include the bankers who wanted to shut down Qadhafi because he was setting up a gold backed currency to compete with the western central bankers, but let’s take a look what they actually did with the memo. If you look at this memo, this is from Jake Sulliven and it goes to Cheryl Mills, close confidant of Hillary Clinton and Victoria Newlan the person who revived the cold war for us in Ukraine, and it says: This is basically off the top of my head, but it shows S’ leadership/ownership/stewardship of this country’s Libya policy from start to finish.

That’s the key thing. Hillary Clinton needs to own the Libyan foreign policy. She wanted to 5 years ago, but she doesn’t want to now. She wants to put some distance there and say “What difference does it make!” They own it from start to finish. She (Cheryl Mills) says let me know what you think, Victoria who else might be able to add to this list? And she puts Secretary Clinton’s leadership on Libya and key paragraph right there: HRC has been a critical voice on Libya in administration deliberations, at NATO, and in contact group meetings – as well as the public face of the U.S. effort in Libya. She was instrumental in securing the authorization, building the coalition, and tightening the noose around Qadhafi and his regime, in other words as she cackled “We came, we saw, he died.” She put this together. And they go through a very long list, a chronology of the various things that she did, meeting with her donors, meeting with foreign governments, and as I pointed out, meeting with the French and telling them, look, you want to keep your neo-colonialist influence that you got going here in Libya, we can help you do that, we’re going to take out Qadhafi because he’s going to become a leading person in this area. And of course these emails showing what was going on, we knew that back in 2011, we reported on it, New American reported on it, many outlets reported on the fact that we all knew that Qadhafi was making no secret of setting up a gold backed currency to go into competition with the fiat currencies of central banks, with the petrodollar that we created, again, and yet we see in their deliberations that was a key factor. We’ve saw that back in January of this year, actually it was on New Years Eve, when they like to release information, the State Department released and declassified 3,000 emails back on New Years Eve, 2015, just like we saw this information coming out on July 4th, they pick the holidays where nobody is watching, to put that in…

Oswald's Raleigh Call: An amazing presentation given by Dr. Grover Proctor with Question and Answer session

Published on Dec 21, 2015

Just hours before his death, Lee Harvey Oswald tried to call Raleigh, North Carolina from the Dallas jail on the evening of Nov. 23, 1963. For years, this significant information was ignored by assassination investigators and concealed from the public.

In the early 1980s, independent researcher Dr. Grover Proctor broke new ground on Oswald’s attempted call. Because of Dr. Proctor’s work, Oswald's attempt to reach former U.S. Intelligence officer John Hurt has become known as “The Raleigh Call.”

Clinton Cash - Director's Cut

Published on Jul 31, 2016

Taking the internet by storm, based on Peter Schweizer’s bestselling book!!!Hillary Clinton went from being “dead broke” after leaving the White House to amassing a net worth of over $150M, with over $2B in donations to their foundation.

Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton Rich. New York Times bestselling book by Peter Schweizer, in which he investigates donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities, paid speeches made by Bill and Hillary Clinton, and the Clintons' personal enrichment since leaving the White House in 2001.

Mr. Schweizer claims: foreign governments and organizations that donated to the Clinton Foundation, and to the Clintons themselves in speaking fees, received favors in exchange from the State Department, headed by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Ed Pilkington, The Guardian, wrote that "Even in the hyper-partisan world of American political publishing, the storm generated by the latest book about the Clintons has been impressive."

James Freeman, The Wall Street Journal "Almost every page of the fascinating Clinton Cash...will be excruciating reading for partisans on both sides of the aisle" and that "The fact that even liberal media outlets are taking the book seriously suggests that a post-election payday is getting harder to achieve."

"This film was not made to make money. It was made to alert the public to the appalling — and dangerous — corruption of the Clintons....

Who could deny the malignant corruption of a couple that used their political power to make money by propping up the world’s worst dictators, cutting down the rain forests, selling off our nuclear resources to our enemies, and bartering off the assets of the poorest nations on earth while their people live in abject poverty?Stopping the Clintons is not about being a good conservative or a good progressive. It’s about being a decent human being." Andrew Breitbart

Eleanor Clift,The Daily Beast: The Clintons have a standard template for pushing back, and they’re going to use it to make questions about their finances seem part of the vast right-wing conspiracy, but character assassination only goes so far.

Galactic Connection: The chicanery and fraud of the Clinton Foundation is absolutely revolting, especially in the case of the so­-called Haitian earthquake relief effort. It’s sickening and appalling how the super rich were enabled to become richer in the wake of a major natural disaster in the poorest nation in the Western Hemisphere. These lowdown grifters cannot be allowed to occupy the White House again! FACT SHEET FOR “CLINTON’S CASH” http://edukcentral.com/KBfX0FIM