For over two centuries free trade arguably has been promoted as the most favorable economic policy among nations (Blinder, 2008). Yet it has yet to be implemented as a global trade policy. The reasons for this are many. Economists often favor protectionist policies or other face saving policies that tend to "protect" nations from what economists deem "unfair competition" (Binder, 2008). However, according to many, it makes more sense to pay others that specialize in work to do specialized work, because in the long-term this will save money. Cutting our nation off from specialists will only result in a reduced quality and standard of living in the long-term. This applies to the U.S. And to nations as a whole. Adam Smith noted this, by stating the following: "It is the maxim of every prudent master of a family, never to attempt to make at home what it will cost him more to make than to buy..." (Binder, 2008).

Thus, if foreign countries can supply the U.S. Or other countries with valuable commodities at cheaper prices than what the home country or U.S. can make, it is better to buy it of the foreign country than to make it at home; this provides the U.S. with an advantage (Binder, 2008; Destler, 2005).

Binder presents this case easily by arguing the case of a lawyer that types especially well. The lawyer may type much better than his secretary. Yet, it would not make sense for the lawyer to stop arguing cases to type. Rather, the lawyer should hire a secretary to do this type of work, because the lawyer specializes in law. It would cost far more for the lawyer to attempt to handle his or her case load and type up the cases and other office or administrative work (Binder, 2008). Likewise, there are times when nations need to hire outside specialists to accomplish certain tasks. To do so is far cheaper than to attempt to carry out certain functions in house. In some cases, China may have a cost advantage points out Binder, in the case of say, manufacturing toys; this however is not the case in manufacturing all items, as in the case of manufacturing electronic items like computers (Binder, 2008). The United States then can manufacture higher end items, and engage in free trade with China to help keep the cost of manufacturing low for both countries. This is an example of making free trade work for both countries. There are many economists that don't agree with this argument however. They note that American workers are not paid at the same wage that Chinese workers are paid at. Thus, they say free trade is not justified. However, Binder points out that wage is dependent on the productivity of its workforce and not the trade policy, and "as long as American workers remain more skilled and better educated, work with more capital, and use superior technology, they will continue to earn higher wages" and the wage gap will disappear once these differences disappear" (Binder, 2008). Thus, everything balances out in the long-term. Within each of the states within the United States, free trade is also enjoyed, with each state specializes in different products.

Governments have long been afraid that free trade would cause them to lose a competitive advantage over their international neighbors. But, this is not often the case. For some time many governments have felt it their duty to control trade so they could secure more financial leverage over their competition. Free trade technically allows traders to trade across national boundaries without interference from respective governments. This should allow trading partners to receive mutual gains from the trade of their goods and services. This would suggest that the prices reflect the true supply and demand of these goods and services; however there is much corruption in the industry. Free trade has not been widely adopted because most countries have adopted policies of either protectionism or mercantilism. This often prevents free trade from flourishing in the manner in which it should, unfortunately preventing most countries from enjoying the many benefits of free trade that they should.

Protectionism is a policy adopted largely by the U.S. And other countries which in the past have been afraid of enjoying the benefits free trade has to offer. It was adopted mostly…[continue]

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

International Trade and Finance Speech:
Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen, I would like to share with you on the current state of the U.S. macro-economy, highlighting the internal and external factors that affect it. Macroeconomic analysis seeks to forecast economic conditions by monitoring and gauging the behavior of several broad areas including gross domestic product (GDP) - which is simply national output, the rate of unemployment, and the state of currency

S. inflation in check, even during economic boom times.
Cultural Values
The debate about increasing protectionism in the U.S. boils down to a clash of cultural values. In the natural course of international trade, there will be those who suffer and those who benefit. International markets are amoral. Trade is conducted between nations with the intent of raising the standard of living for both, but this is on aggregate, not universally. As

The creation of jobs will be beneficial to Pakistan, as it will lead to: an increase in the standard of living, a decrease in social costs and an improvement in political stability. On the other hand, its neighbor India will benefit from Pakistan's geographical neighbors to include: Iran, Afghanistan, China and Tajikistan. As India would be able to benefit from Iran, due to the fact that: the country is

The '1971 Immigration Act and Immigration Restrictions', that are in vogue now has least controversy, compared to restrictions elsewhere. The policy is now well defined.
The huge flow of people from abroad, particularly from the Eastern European region, was having a great strain with regard to society, health, jobs, housing and health. Majority of the UK populace view that migrants are responsible the increase in HIV, other types of diseases,

International Trade
Each year, globalization plays a more profound role in regards to the national economies of the world. Globalization has allowed for the expansion of corporations beyond their natural domestic limits. As such it has contributed to an increased standard of living for those who embrace its presence. Free trade therefore, is a welcomed addition within the overarching trend of globalization. Free trade allows for the transfer of goods and

Country Study: China
International trade and finance
Exports
Imports
China Economic Issues with Trade
Suggestions for improving trading practices
COUNTRY STUDY: CHINA
COUNTRY STUDY: CHINA
COUNTRY STUDY: CHINA
China, officially the People's Republic of China (PRC), is considered to be a sovereign state located in East Asia. It is the world's most populous country, with a population that has over 1.35 billion. The People Republic of China is a single-party state which is supervised by the Communist Party, with

MNCs
Multinational Corporations and the International Economy
This essay examines the role of multinational corporations (MNCs) in the global economy. Depending upon the point-of-view, multinational firms are either demonized or celebrated for their role in globalization. Navaretti and Venables (1), both professors of international economics, cite evidence that they are generally a force for prosperity in the world economy.
Even though modern multinational firms date back to the late nineteenth century, the term