So here’s an unfortunate reality that we have all been trying not to notice: the Caps’ top line is not working. After an absurdlysuccessful Cup run, Alex Ovechkin and Evgeny Kuznetsov seem to have lost their magic at 5-on-5. After outscoring opponents 35 to 28 last season (and 20 to 9 in the postseason), Ovi and Kuzy are now being outscored 12 to 10. Considering how bad their defensive play has been, they should be thankful it’s that close.

Here is the case for breaking up Ovechkin and Kuznetsov.

As of Friday night, there were 270 forward trios in the league with at least 20 five-on-five minutes together. Of those 270, Ovechkin and Kuznetsov’s trios are at the extreme lower end of most shot-based metrics.

With Linemate

Attempt%

Attempt% Rank

Expected%

Expected% Rank

Connolly

44.1

213rd

46.5

184th

Vrana

39.3

252nd

32.4

254th

Jaskin

40.3

247th

21.2

267th

Stephenson

36.5

257th

42.5

216th

Smith-Pelly

43.8

218th

48.2

169th

In general, you want any trio’s shot-attempt and expected-goal percentages to be above fifty, i.e. they’re getting more offense than their opponents. But for a marquee line like Ovechkin’s that gets lots of minutes and high-leverage starts in the offensive zone, it’s even more important for them to be driving play. But not only are Ovi-Kuzy in all their variations not driving play, they’re getting dominated like some of the worst lines in the league.

Here are the bottom-25 lines in the NHL according to their shot-attempt percentages.

Line

Team

TOI

Attempt%

Expected%

Sutter / Virtanen / Mote

VAN

21

25.0

16.6

Schenn / Perron / Schwartz

STL

20

25.8

47.8

Vesey / Hayes / Spooner

NYR

20

31.0

44.1

Paajarvi / Pyatt / Smith

OTT

27

31.4

33.3

Ryan / Tierney / Boedker

OTT

46

31.6

25.2

Puljujarvi / Draisaitl / Rieder

EDM

22

31.6

36.6

Athanasiou / Abdelkader / Vanek

DET

28

32.2

32.4

Shore / Janmark / Seguin

DAL

25

32.4

44.9

Fiala / Bonino / Harman

NSH

21

32.5

30.1

Barkov / Dadonov / Hoffman

FLA

31

34.0

28.6

Comeau / Janmark / Faksa

DAL

36

35.0

48.2

Burakovsky / Stephenson / Eller

WSH

24

35.6

38.5

Rakell / Getzlaf / Terry

ANA

23

36.1

19.0

Ovechkin / Stephenson / Kuznetsov

WSH

32

36.5

42.5

Cullen / Hornqvist / Sheahan

PIT

49

37.5

48.2

Coyle / Eriksson Ek / Greenway

MIN

44

38.2

44.1

Soderberg / Bourque / Nieto

COL

35

38.8

39.2

Yamamoto / Draisaitl / Lucic

EDM

35

39.2

20.5

Ovechkin / Kuznetosv / Vrana

WSH

43

39.3

32.4

Fortin / Martinsen / Kruger

CHI

20

39.5

42.6

Ladd / Komarov / Filppula

NYI

79

39.9

40.6

Neal / Gaudreau / Monahan

CGY

23

40.0

37.3

Henrique / Silfverberg / Comtois

ANA

51

40.2

43.0

Ovechkin / Jaskin / Kuznetsov

WSH

37

40.3

21.2

Sprong / Cullen / Sheahan

PIT

26

40.4

38.0

These are some abysmal trios, including the bottom-six dregs of Ottawa, Edmonton, and Vancouver. But also in there are three appearances by the greatest scorer of our generation and the supposed best line of the Washington Capitals. So that’s not great.

I want to emphasize two factors here. First, it’s not just shot attempts. If Ovechkin and Kuznetsov found a way to trade attempts with opponents because they knew they’d generate more dangerous chances, that’d be one thing. But that’s definitely not happening. In addition to getting out-shot and out-scored, Ovechkin and Kuznetsov are getting blown out in every measurement we have of shot quality.

And the second factor is this: the right wing is not the problem. Speaking to both points, here are numbers are from Natural Stat Trick:

With Linemate

TOI

Attempt%

Chance%

High-Danger%

Connolly

50

44.6

45.5

34.8

Vrana

43

39.8

36.8

20.0

Jaskin

37

40.3

38.9

33.3

Stephenson

32

36.5

42.4

37.5

Smith-Pelly

27

43.8

44.4

41.7

Given that percentages below 50 are undesirable, we should also acknowledge that numbers below 40 percent are particularly atrocious. In 43 minutes, the Vrana version of the top line gave their opponents five high-danger scoring chances for every one they generated. This is a sign that something is deeply wrong with the line, but the fact that those results are not uncommon for other iterations of the line suggests that it’s not the fault of Brett Connolly, Jakub Vrana, Dmitrij Jaskin, Chandler Stephenson, or Devante Smith-Pelly.

Head coach Todd Reirden has tried every conceivable flavor of Ovechkin-Kuznetsov, and every experiment has reinforced the same inescapable conclusion: it is Ovechkin and Kuznetsov that are the problem.

No one would call Alex Ovechkin defensively sound (at least not since he was drafted in 2004). His talent has always been in generating explosive offense, even as the how of that generation has changed as Ovechkin has evolved. The same can be said of Kuznetsov, whose playmaking skill is undeniable, but whose two-way talents have long been in dispute, here on RMNB at least. Several years ago, when Kuznetsov was paired with Justin Williams and Marcus Johansson, he centered one of the best shutdown lines in the league, but with those players gone it has become clear who was behind their collective stoutness.

Now together, it seems to be Ovechkin and Kuznetsov’s play without the puck that is the culprit. Neither of them fills the role of the aggressive forechecker in a 1-2-2 setup, the guy who pressures the puck carrier and corrals him towards teammates. Instead, Ovechkin and Kuznetsov are opportunistic — in a good way. They float high and wait for the right moment to create a play. Except, lately, that moment happens less often.

Here’s a short explanation of the 1-2-2 forecheck and a diagram of its initial state from Hockey Plays and Strategies by Ryan Walter and Mike Johnston:

This forecheck involves hard pressure from the first forward (F1), and then as the puck is moved, quick pressure from F2 or F3 while F1 recovers. When F1 initiates pressure, he should angle the puck carrier in order to provide F2 and F3 a read on where the puck may go. Some coaches like F1 to stop the puck carrier from getting the back of the net and turn him up the boards, while other coaches encourage F1 to angle—steer and get a hit to separate the puck from the puck carrier. If F1 pressures the puck carrier and the puck is moved in the direction he is skating, then he should avoid finishing the hit and continue on to pressure the pass. . . F2 and F3 should be wide to initially take away passes to the boards and then react to mid-ice passes as they happen.

We have seen various right wingers attempt the role of the top line’s F1, especially Jakub Vrana, but they have not been consistently successful. The best example from any line on the team is Nicklas Backstrom. He is relentless in board battles, a savvy stick-checker, and one of the strongest puck carriers in the entire league. Without a capable player leading the forecheck, Ovechkin and Kuznetsov can’t apply pressure, especially along the boards. (When was the last time you saw Ovechkin in a board battle?) As a result, opponents get out of their zone cleanly and start more dangerous rush attacks against the Washington net.

This discussion so far has conveniently omitted a player. Ovechkin and Kuznetsov’s assumed third man, Tom Wilson, has been suspended since the preseason. Wilson is a fast, aggressive forechecker who is ferocious along the boards — all the things that Ovechkin and Kuznetsov are lacking right now. But history suggests that Wilson might not help.

From the last three seasons, here are opponent rates (per hour) against Ovechkin with and without Wilson on the ice:

Ovechkin

TOI

Attempts

Scoring Chances

High-Danger

With Wilson

812

57.6

28.7

12.3

Without Wilson

2733

58.4

26.5

11.1

Change

-1.4%

+8.3%

+10.8%

While opponents see a minor decrease in the volume of the offense, they get notable upticks in the quality of their offense. Even if Wilson could forecheck effectively, there may be more wrong here than he could fix.

I wonder if the magic of the playoffs has us all — but Todd Reirden especially — misremembering Ovechkin and Kuznetsov’s history. Since the beginning of 2016-17, they’ve played together on what I consider eight occurrences.

Ovechkin/Kuznetsov

TOI

Attempt%

Oct 2016

74

53.2

Nov 2016

65

45.3

Dec 2016

109

55.0

Oct-Nov 2017

277

45.1

Jan 2018

69

56.9

Mar-Apr 2018

163

50.8

Loffs 2018

320

51.7

Oct-Nov 2018

200

41.3

While there were some bright spots — especially January 2018, when they were the best part of a top-heavy Caps crew — Ovechkin and Kuznetsov have not been consistently dominant at 5-on-5. But now, for whatever reasons, they are spiraling.

Todd Reirden seems to know something is wrong; in one month he has tried five different players at right wing. But the repeated failure of that line despite replacement of a single variable tells us the problem lies elsewhere. Ovechkin and Kuznetsov are both spectacular players, but together they have fallen into bad habits that are hurting one another and the team. It’s time for them to get a break from one another. It’s time to reunite Alex Ovechkin and Nicklas Backstrom.

This article would not be possible without Corsica and Natural Stat Trick. Please consider joining RMNB in supporting them via Patreon.