Although psychodynamic interviews often provide a broad spectrum of interesting and useful information for the therapist,
most of these interviews lack sufficient psychometric quality. So far, the Developmental Profile interview seemed an exception.
However, only firstlevel reliability ratings based on a written account of an interview had been conducted. This study presents
the results of a second-level reliability study of the Developmental Profile, based on ratings of videotapes of the Profile
interview. A total of 32 videotaped interviews with psychotherapeutic inpatients were rated by three independent raters in
compliance with the new version of the Developmental Profile rating manual. Contrary to earlier findings, the authors found
insufficient reliability. Results are discussed.

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let
the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible
and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library, or send a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
You will be contacted as soon as possible.