Health Alert

Hazardous asbestos fibers at the WTC exposed more than 110,000 people to the dangerous material; this includes 80,000 tower workers, 30,000 area residents and nearly 4,000 first responders. Asbestos exposure is directly linked to mesothelioma cancer and other asbestos-related diseases.

Patrick Leahy – 9.11 Truth’s Best Chance for Justice?

Is there any hope that Congress will reopen 9.11 for investigation? Many of us have been wondering this since the historic election results of early November handing Democrats a majority in both houses of Congress.

Many of us are rightfully jaded. The democrats in many respects have been complicit in the cover-up of many of the most important facts and questions associated with that day.

But, we should not entirely give up hope. The political tides are changing, and there is perhaps one glimmer of hope that we should all consider actionable.

In October of 2001 Senator Patrick Leahy was one of two democrats targeted in the Anthrax attacks (which was later verified to have originated in US military bio-weapons labs). These attacks helped to usher in the Patriot Act which Leahy had opposed.

According to Paul Thompson’s timeline:

"On October 4, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman and future anthrax target Patrick Leahy (D) accuses the Bush administration of reneging on an agreement on the anti-terrorist bill. Leahy is in a key position to block or slow the bill."

And then in late September 2006 Senator Patrick Leahy posed the following questions:

“The two questions that the congress will not ask, because republicans wont allow it, is why did 9/11 happen on George Bush's watch when he had clear warnings that it was going to happen? Why did they allow it to happen? And secondly, when they had Osama Bin Laden cornered why didnt they get him?”

I would like to start this letter by congratulating you on the resounding victory the democrats enjoyed in the midterm elections of 2006. The American public has presented the Democrats with a mandate for change, and it is my sincere hope that this opportunity will not be squandered.

It is for this reason that I would like to petition your office, as Chair of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee, to follow up on a verbal pledge you made to ask the difficult questions associated with the events of September 11, 2001.

Specifically, you stated in September of 2006:

“The two questions that the congress will not ask, because republicans wont allow it, is why did 9/11 happen on George Bush's watch when he had clear warnings that it was going to happen? Why did they allow it to happen? And secondly, when they had Osama Bin Laden cornered why didn’t they get him?”

But, the questions do not stop there. On August 12, 2006 the Washington Post reported that the 9/11 Commissioners themselves considered filing criminal charges with the Justice Department against NORAD, for knowingly providing them with false information regarding our failed air defenses on that day.

Yet, the 9/11 Commission Report was allowed to go forward, under the leadership of Executive Director Phillip Zelikow, with these known inaccuracies included. Zelikow, as you know, headed up George W. Bush’s presidential transition team in 2000-2001, and co-authored a book with Condoleeza Rice. Hardly an unbiased and independent Executive Director.

“The US government and 9/11 Commission are covering up – 42%”
Results from nationwide poll
Zogby America, 5/12/06 through 5/16/06

“16% of Americans think the government is telling the truth about 9/11”
According to a New York Times/CBS News poll,

Polls clearly indicate that the American public is unwilling to accept or believe only partial answers to these questions. The implications of this are staggering.

It is for this reason that I would like to petition your office to reopen 9/11 for congressional criminal investigations under your leadership. I believe it is of vital interest to the people of Vermont, and the Republic itself, that the American public be provided with full accountability and transparency on the issue of 9/11.

I enjoyed your film and thank you for your efforts. The Atta/Abramoff scandal in particular is one of the biggest smoking guns of 911 and deserves to be mentioned alongside WTC7, the war games and other oft-cited anomalies (actually, the war games are barely ever mentioned, which is a major mistake imo). Unfortunately, non-physical evidence is not quite as "sexy" as the hole in the Pentagon, so it is usually marginalized. I think we have to embrace a dual approach, embracing both physical evidence and non. That means at least paying lip service to the kind of information you present in your film, if not placing it front and center.

Any agitation with respect the puppets in Congress can only be a good thing. Positive change is almost invariably produced by agitation from below, not above; only when the natives get really restless to bureaucrats and politicians respond -- usually with a compromise which is then redacted in a decade or two.

911 truth presents a catch-22 for elites. It exposes them for the frauds and parasites they are and is therefore anathema, yet the fraud is so transparent that they cannot ignore it entirely. They need more than Richard Clarke's (obviously staged) limited hangout and they will likely produce it.

The realist in me suggests that 911 cannot be acknowledged as false flag no matter what -- I"m only involved in this movement because it wakes people up to the barbarities of state capitalism -- but we live in interesting times. It's possible, theoretically, that an attempted limited hangout could explode via a deep throat, so efforts such as you suggest should be encouraged. Ultimately, however, we will have to resist the urge to pin 911 solely on the Bush administration. 911 was not just a cause but a symptom. It was a desperate act by a degenerate ruling class addicted to war and exploitation. They had two choices: begin devolving power to the people or go for the gold. Their institutional roles eliminated the former option. They had to launch 911, and 911 will be their downfall.

"The realist in me suggests that 911 cannot be acknowledged as false flag no matter what -- I"m only involved in this movement because it wakes people up to the barbarities of state capitalism -- but we live in interesting times. It's possible, theoretically, that an attempted limited hangout could explode via a deep throat, so efforts such as you suggest should be encouraged. Ultimately, however, we will have to resist the urge to pin 911 solely on the Bush administration. 911 was not just a cause but a symptom. It was a desperate act by a degenerate ruling class addicted to war and exploitation. They had two choices: begin devolving power to the people or go for the gold. Their institutional roles eliminated the former option. They had to launch 911, and 911 will be their downfall."

Yes, but be wary for them throwing us a scummy nationalist/"small money" fascist to try to destroy us in a revolution over these revelations.

The destruction of our country (to make way for the globalist one-world fascist dictatorship) is, I believe. the endgame of 9/11.

Do it. Get the cash. Get control of the resources. Pass the laws. Get out when the stuff hits. (see-Germany, WWII). They are not stupid. They knew the story would not hold up and would inevitably destroy the last vestiges of trust between the people and the government, thus clearing the way for the UN forces (or whatever name they come up with) to be, after much internal chaos, 'greeted as liberators'.

The only apparent hope, I believe, is for the people to understand the tools and methods being used to control their minds (TV, pop culture, schools, etc) and steal the fruits of their labors (fiat currency, irs, etc). An truly informed people is their nightmare.

The events of 9/11 present our last (and, ironically, perhaps best) opportunity to expose the active conspiracy between the media and the government to "treat us like mushrooms". (Fed sh*t and kept in the dark).

I am speaking at Boston College on December 15th, along with Dr Robert Bowman. I intend to have a stack of these letters printed out to distribute, so all people have to do is sign it and drop it in the mail to Leahy.

We really need to convert all of this interest from the public into ACTIONS. Although research is important, at this point I believe we need to really start pressing hard for action.

Thanks for this synthesis...and the letter/activism. It's really easy to get discouraged with the Democrats...but there are still a few in there that have power and are willing to use it. Leahy is definitely one of them. Thanks for all your efforts!

(I sent a letter right after I saw he said bush should be "terrified" )

Aaron James- MOTHER AND I Profiled Attacked and LEFT IN POOL OF BLOOD IN MIDDLE OF ISLE OF AIRCRAFT NWA FLIGHT 1628 JAN 18/06- CURRENTLY UNDER THREAT. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gSw-NlUfwE , http://justiceforjames.blogspot.com, http://www.aaronjamesWe have just now sent Patrick Leahy's Office a fax and email transmission in attempt to give them notification of the horrors threats and persecution we have suffered over the last 12 months-(Media censored, which is why you have not heard of our plight which is comparible to an Arar plight in its scope and severity-a secret trial with cia nsa fbi on jury pool where we were threatened against anti gov material I posted on internet if I testified, fbi at my home, incessant bargage against family and friends- WE ARE IN GRAVE DANGER.

Please view our you tube presenation and help us fight media censorship of our plight by spreading the word.