Please define what you mean by something “having to do with the law”. A piece about a protest that was shut down by the police but continued in the face of potential arrests; a piece about freedom of expression and legitimate/illegitimate restrictions on the same; a piece about dissent in the framework of law seems very much to do with the law.
Is your problem with it that it isn’t about a partner move from A firm to B (is that your limited understanding of the law?) or that someone criticized Modi

Mr. Purohit, this is not the first time ABVP has indulged in hooliganism and by the looks of it, it won’t be the last.
The source of information you cite is the blog of an ABVP member, and of course he denies violence from ABVP, but his credibility is not strong on this front.
The ABVP fails to give any evidence that these students are naxalites, but merely point to their communist sympathies as being evidence enough. Being communist is not a crime, neither is having sympathy for the conditions of those embroiled in the naxal revolution, regardless of what you or other ABVP supporters may believe.
Your lies and your violence will not silence dissent, it’ll make it grow stronger. The masses do not fear your hooliganism. Let us see how you manage to silence the masses.

Recent Comments

Anon on Breaking: Delhi HC disposes of publisher’s appeal in DU photocopier case, restores suit"Concurred with Justice Endlaw's judgment"? Do you guys even read the order before posting? Please tell me one part of