Just Out: "Ethics & International Affairs" Winter 2017 Issue

This issue contains essays by Jonathan D. Caverley on how to slow the proliferation of major conventional weapons and Janos Pasztor on why international governance of geoengineering is so desperately needed; a roundtable on the overlapping relationship between the laws and the ethics of war, with contributions from David Luban, Valerie Morkevicius, James Turner Johnson, and Edward Barrett; a feature by Christopher J. Preston comparing the relative moral culpability of a carbon emitter to that of a benevolent climate engineer, with responses from Holly Lawford-Smith, Sikina Jinnah and Douglas Bushey, and Mike Hulme; and book reviews from Michael Goodhart, Ryan Jenkins, Sophie Rosenberg, Anna Stilz, and Matt Zwolinski.

ESSAYS

Slowing the Proliferation of Major Conventional Weapons: The Virtue...Jonathan D. CaverleyProliferation of major conventional weapons (MCW) is at best a waste of valuable resources and at worst a fuel for more and bloodier conflicts. In this essay, Jonathan D. Caverley shows how the United States, pursuing its own political interests, can leverage its massive market power to slow the proliferation of MCW.

The Need for Governance of Climate Geoengineering[Full Text]Janos PasztorIn this essay, Janos Pasztor explains some of the major ethical issues surrounding geoengineering and introduces the Carnegie Climate Geoengineering Governance Initiative (C2G2), a major new effort to catalyze conversation on geoengineering governance, bringing together players from a wide range of social, geographical, and professional backgrounds.

Just War Theory and the Laws of War as Nonidentical TwinsDavid LubanIn this essay, David Luban examines the similarities, but even more the dissimilarities, between just war theory and the laws of war. Specifically, he argues that, unlike just war theory, the laws of war require binary, on-off answers, come in packages, and are often detached from their original rationale.

Looking Inward Together: Just War Thinking and Our Shared Moral Emo...Valerie MorkevičiusValerie Morkevičius argues in this essay that just war thinking serves a social and psychological role that international law cannot fill. Law is dispassionate and objective, while just war thinking accounts for emotions and the situatedness of individuals. She proposes four ways that just war thinking can move beyond the law by focusing on moral emotions.

A Practically Informed Morality of War: Just War, International Law...James Turner JohnsonJust war, international law, and world order are all historically conditioned realities that interrelate with one another in complex ways. This essay explores their historical development and current status while critically examining their interrelationship, and concludes by suggesting the importance of dialogue to strengthen both the moral and legal basis for world order.

Carbon Emissions, Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), and Uninte...Christopher J. PrestonIn this article, Christopher J. Preston compares the culpability for any unintended harms resulting from stratospheric aerosol injection versus culpability for the unintended harms already taking place due to carbon emissions. To make this comparison, both types of unintended harms are viewed through the lens of the doctrine of double effect.

CARBON EMISSIONS, SAI, AND UNINTENDED HARMS: THREE RESPONSES

The Comparative Culpability of SAI and Ordinary Carbon EmissionsHolly Lawford-SmithIn this response, Holly Lawford-Smith points to the issue of agency in Preston's analysis. She argues that while the harms of geoengineering will be caused by culpable agents acting intentionally, the harms connected to climate change emerge out of the uncoordinated actions of billions of people. This problem of agency undermines any comparison about their relative culpability.

Bringing Politics into SAISikina Jinnah and Douglas BusheyIn this response, Sikina Jinnah and Douglas Bushey unpack the political implications of some of Preston's assumptions and framing decisions in an effort to add a layer of practical richness to the abstraction of his analysis.

Calculating the Incalculable: Is SAI the Lesser of Two Evils?Mike HulmeIn this response, Mike Hulme claims that Preston's argument rests shakily on the ability to determine and quantify climate harms and to distinguish forensically between their causes. Hulme also points to the importance of the distributional effects of the harms and their ethical and political ramifications.

The Theory of Self-DeterminationFernando R. Tesón, ed.Review by Anna StilzThis volume brings together international lawyers and philosophers, both skeptics and proponents, to debate the right to self-determination, enhancing our understanding of the normative issues surrounding this topic and achieving a distinctively interdisciplinary tone.

Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane EconomyPhilippe van Parijs and Yannick VanderborghtReview by Matt ZwolinskiBasic Income offers by far the most comprehensive and up-to-date discussion of universal basic income (UBI) available today, including a fascinating intellectual history of UBI, the major arguments for and against it, and the ethical issues it poses.

Twitter

Carnegie Council

The highlight of the Fall 2019 issue of "Ethics & International Affairs" is a roundtable on "Economic Sanctions and Their Consequences." Other topics include human rights and conflict resolution, Afghan attitudes toward civilian wartime harm, the role of supererogation on the battlefield, and the ethics of not-so-civil resistance.

Ahead of the Climate Strike rallies on September 20, Bard College's Brian Mateo discusses the Climate Reality Project, founded by Vice President Al Gore, and how it has informed his work regarding environmental activism and education. Why has Greta Thunberg's Climate Strike been so successful? How can protests turn into concrete policies?

A draft of a new presidential directive on American foreign aid suggests that transactionalism will shift from being a rhetorical device to an actual defining principle. How will the continued departure from the pre-2016 bipartisan consensus impact the foreign aid community?

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use Global Ethics Network.

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.