Our daily prayers go to the people in Japan as they cope
with this devastating situation. Especially to those heroes at the plant,
putting their lives on the line for all of us to prevent the radiation from spreading.

Let's use this situation as a reminder of the
dangers that nuclear plants represent to all of us and to our planet. This is
the third mayor accident. Please take a moment to sign a petition to prevent new
nuclear plants from developing:
click here

Japan's official present state of evacuation:

Since the Fukushima accident we're constantly searching for
reliable radiation plumes
maps and relevant information that can accurately represent the present state of radiation pollution
worldwide. We try to keep it as accurate and real as we possible can.

We placed the maps below so you can have an idea of
the level of radiation exposure you might be getting from Fukushima.
Depending on your location around the globe supplement your nutrition as needed.
See below for nutritional recommendations.

Although the
Iodine 131 &
the
Caelsium 137 plume has been dispersing throughout the pacific,
traces of I-131 have been found already in Milk in Washington State on 3/25/11.
I-131 has an eight days half life so it decays pretty quickly although the
longer this situation last the more the accumulative effects.

Please note that these maps are of
surface concentration of the radioactive gases, which is what is relevant
to our health, and not the dramatic total column atmospheric concentration
showed on other websites.

This last map shows the current dispersion of Iodine 131:

The following map shows the caesium 137 which
disperses itself mostly in water so the biggest risk areas are around the
Fukushima plant. Cs-137 has a half life of 30.17 years. After entering the body,
caesium gets more or less uniformly distributed through the body, with higher
concentration in muscle tissues and lower in bones. The biological half-life of
caesium is rather short at about 70 days. Experiments with dogs showed that a
single dose of 3800 μCi/kg (approx. 44 μg/kg of caesium-137) is lethal within
three weeks.

On 25 March,
IAEA indicated that in the long term, caesium-137 (with a half-life of 30
years) would be the most relevant isotope as far as doses was concerned and
indicated the possibility "to follow this nuclide over long distances for
several years." The organization also said it could take months or years for the
isotope to reach "other shores of the Pacific".

The following map shows the concentration of
Xenon-133
on surface. Although Xenon has been released globally, it is considered a far
more inert and harmless form of radioactivity (half life of 5 days) in
comparison to the far more dangerous iodine-131 and caesium-137.

The
Rhenish
Institute for Environmental Research at the University of Cologne, Germany
stopped publishing the following
caesium 137 map that represented the potential
dispersion of the radioactive cloud over the northern hemisphere. From their
site: "This simulation is a so called "worst case scenario" with continuous
release rate. The value of 0.001 Bq/m3 correspond to approximate one millionth
of the concentration at the source. At distances more than appr. 2000 km away
from the source, the concentrations are not harmful to health. The simulation
starts fictitious at 15.03. 00 UTC and will continue to run in order to
demonstrate the intercontinental transport. When exact release rates are
published we will restart the simulation with reliable values."

The observational data of the CTBTO now show a
clear decrease of the worldwide radioactive concentrations outside of Japan.
Therefore we now do not continue with the predictions for the northern
hemisphere. We thank you for your lively interest in our work, for many
questions and comments.

To keep things in perspective here is a couple of
radiation charts from different sources to give you an idea of the radiation
exposure that we get in our daily lives in comparison to the direct exposure close to the Fukushima plant:
(click on the images to zoom in).

To give you an idea of what is a safe radiation
dose, we don't recommend pregnant women (in their first three months of
pregnancy) to air travel. A regular trip from LA to NY will expose you to 40
micro sieverts (about half the radiation of a chest X-ray or 8 dental X-rays).
No wonder why medical and aviation are the groups receiving the greatest
occupational radiation dose in the USA (see
chart). Babies exposed to one x-ray during their first trimester were 12
times more likely to have leukemia than those that were not exposed according to
Gabriel Cousin's article.

4/11/11 -
Japanese Declare Crisis at Level of Chernobyl: Even though the amount of
released radiation is about a tenth of Chernobyl, since the Fukushima Daiichi
plant is still releasing radioactive materials, the total level of radiation
released could eventually exceed that of Chernobyl, a spokesman said.

4/8/11 -
From UC
Berkeley Results Log: Our food chain tests have been updated to include
strawberries, topsoil, and a second grass measurement. Overall, activity in the
grass seems to be falling, but the grass may be concentrating cesium by a factor
of approximately 5 relative to the soil. The topsoil currently has more I-131
than any of the plant or food samples. We are continuing to sample to better
understand the isotope pathways from the soil into plants.

3/18/11 -
Trace of Radiation detected in California:Although a trace of
Xenon-133 radiation gas has been detected in California on 3/17/11,
the level measured in Sacramentowas roughly one-millionth of the dose a
person normally receives from rocks, bricks, the sun and other natural sources,
according to the EPA. So no need to worry as of yet.

*Disclaimer: The information provided within this
entire website may greatly assist you to naturally & nutritionally
replenish, renew and/or regain your health. BUT, please understand,
that ALL the statements posted on this entire website
http://healthandlight.com HAVE NOT been evaluated by the Food and
Drug Administration. The suggested products, information and
procedures provided within this entire website are not intended to
diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease and are for educational
purposes only and based on anecdotal testimonies, not intended to
replace the advice of your health care professional. Health & Light
Institute as well as all the companies represented in this website
do not dispense medical advice, prescribe or diagnose any illnesses.
The information taken from this website and acted upon by the reader
or other interested parties is carried out at that individual's own
personal risk. Those with health problems, or who are pregnant or
nursing, are specifically advised that they should consult their
physician before using any device, product, or perform any suggested
procedure.