Search form

You are here

The following article is the second part of a three-part series outlining the background of the leftist assault on Britain and Western Civilisation. Part One can be viewed here.

------

The Marxist left liberals have now completed their long march through the institutions. They claim the varied lunatic policies they enacted were for the benefit of society, but can this really be the case? When viewed through the prism of reality, much of Socialism's ideology appears to have one aim and one aim only: the total destruction of society. This is not an overreaction by any means â€“ if societal destruction was your bag, would you not carry out the following?

Â

Destroy Industry

What is the difference between booming Germany and bankrupt Britain? Simple: Germany manufactures and Britain consumes â€“ but this was not always the case. Britain once had a dominant engineering and ship-building industry, and was Europe's biggest manufacturer of cars and motor-cycles. It was therefore essential to sabotage our industrial base â€“ our means of production â€“ in order to destroy capitalist Britain. Many trades union leaders of the 1950s through to the 1980s were Communists or Communist sympathisers who organised strikes and 'downed tools' so successfully that Britain's industrial base went to the wall. Writing in The Spectator a few years ago, Douglas Eden outlined the infiltration of British Trades Unions, and how their pro-Soviet ideology was tolerated by Labour Prime Ministers up until the election in 1979 of Margaret Thatcher. Mrs Thatcher, incidentally, is hated so viscerally by the left liberals because her defeat of the unions was perceived to have ended the dream of International Communism.

Destroy the family

Feminism has often been described as a war against men, but it is more than just that. Feminist ideology is really about war against the family, because families tend to be self-sufficient and therefore less reliant on the state. As Socialism is all about state control, then the family must be smashed.

Betty Friedan, Simone de Beauvoir and Germaine Greer, Communist supporters all, took their dysfunctional ideology from Friedrich Engels' statement in The Origin of the Family: "The modern individual family is founded on the open or concealed slavery of the wife ... within the family he is the bourgeois and his wife represents the proletariat." Germaine Greer is in complete agreement with Engels, and her book The Female Eunuch is essentially a clarion call for destruction, anarchy and Communism, as we can see from the following quote: "Women's liberation, if it abolishes the patriarchal family, will abolish a necessary structure of the authoritarian state, and once that withers away Marx will have come true willy-nilly, so let's get on with it."

Greer goes on to say: "But man made one grave mistake ... he admitted women to politics and the professions. The conservatives who saw this as the undermining of our civilisation and the end of the state and marriage were right after all; it is time for the demolition to begin." Well, thanks, Germaine! The demolition not only began; it is now all but over. Surveys suggest children raised in conventional families are far less likely to go off the rails, but in the Socialist world the ends justify the means, so feminists ignore the broken lives and thwarted ambitions of fatherless, state supported children, particularly those of West Indian origin and the white working-class members of the abandoned proletariat. In addition, brainwashed British women have put abortion and careers before motherhood and give birth to a new generation 25% smaller than their own, which effectively destroys any hope of an equal or growing future taxpayer base to fund the welfare state.

Â

Eradicate Religion

All great civilisations have been built around great religions. Western Civilisation is built on the foundations of Judeo-Christianity, so if Western Civilisation is to be destroyed then its religious pillars must first be undermined. Again, this destructive ethos is derived from Communist ideology. Christianity and Communism are fundamentally incompatible â€“ one is a spiritual creed, the other materialist. Christianity lays down that a man's responsibility to his neighbour is personal, a matter for his individual conscience, while Communism decrees that all duties are collective, to be enforced by the state. Karl Marx stated: "The social principles of Christianity preach cowardice, self-contempt, abasement, submission, humility. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people."

Communists believed the Ten Commandments to be a form of "class morality" that served only the interests of the bourgeoisie. Anatole Lunarcharsky, a Russian Commissar of education declared: "We hate Christianity and Christians ... they preach love of one's neighbours and mercy, which is contrary to our principles. Christian love is an obstacle to the development of the Revolution! What we want is hate, only then can we conquer the world."

In Britain, Christianity is not outlawed, just sidelined, sneered at, and its practice sometimes criminalised. The persecution of British Christians has reached such a level that in 2010 Lord Carey, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, and six prominent bishops, penned an open letter to the Labour government stating: "We are deeply concerned at the apparent discrimination shown against Christians and we call on the Government to remedy this serious development. In a number of cases, Christian beliefs on marriage, conscience and worship are simply not being upheld. There have been numerous dismissals of practising Christians from employment for reasons that are unacceptable in a civilised country."

Perhaps Lord Carey actually understands that the Marxist elites in Britain share the same hatred of Christianity, for precisely the same reasons as did the Communists. The BBC after all appointed a controversial Muslim, Aaqil Ahmed, to head up their religious affairs department.

In 2006 the BBC was shamed into rewriting an anti-Christian pro-Islamic text aimed at schoolchildren, which described Christianity as a religion of racism, sexism, colonialism, enslavement and murder, whilst Islam, with its arranged marriages, honour killings and second class status for women under Sharia law, was deemed a female-friendly religion. Britain's left liberal elites clearly consider Christianity to be an impediment to the ideology of the New Socialist Man they seem intent on building.

Â

Eradicate Morality

There is little point in eradicating religion without ensuring the concomitant destruction of morality, hence the invention of moral relativism which argues there is no such thing as right or wrong. Lenin invoked the same ideology, but did so in a more honest manner when he said, "Morality is that which furthers the revolution." The Marxists and liberal left who now control the education and media establishments in Britain know that massive social change cannot be brought about by outright revolution, so realise that anarchy must first prevail â€“ just as espoused by GyÃ¶rgy LukÃ¡cs. A sure-fire way to create an anarchic situation is to remove the young from the codes of behaviour that religion and morality demand.

Â

Destroy Community

Like families, communities tend toward self-sufficiency and are the bedrock of nation states. The community is simply part of a chain â€“ family, community, village, town, city, country, nation state. Communities are capable of acting together in defiance of the state â€“ ergo, they too must be smashed. How to do so? Demolish streets of family houses and build impersonal blocks; close down local schools and hospitals and build mega-versions controlled by faceless bureaucrats rather than locally known people; close local post offices where the elderly meet and gossip once a week; outlaw smoking and make pubs (the nerve centres of individual resistance) prohibitively expensive. In short, fragment and isolate the population so they feel alone and powerless before the all-powerful state and its ever growing army of interfering bureaucrats.

Â

Destroy the Middle Class

Shortly after the jailed dissident turned president Vaclav Havel came to power in Czechoslovakia in 1989, he stated that the rebuilding of Socialism's shattered economic, moral, spiritual and environmental forty-year catastrophe could not take place until a new middle class had formed. This is exactly right. The middle classes are the backbone of any functioning democracy. They pay taxes; they participate in their children's education; they form committees and pressure groups; they raise money for local causes; they are self-sufficient and require little or nothing from the state. Such independent actions make them an acute threat to the state and must therefore be smashed. Disguised as the promotion of a 'classless society' Britain's middle-classes have been systematically traduced by the educational and media establishments, because they represent the bourgeoisie in ideology, if not in income.

Â

Destroy the Working Class

Britain has been importing a low-skilled 'workforce' from less developed countries for decades, whilst simultaneously exporting low-skilled jobs abroad. Whilst it is pleasant for highly-paid BBC liberals to employ cheap nannies and cleaners, the working class find themselves in direct competition with immigrants, which is an area where they simply cannot compete. A Polish builder who works for half the rate of a British builder does not have to pay a mortgage or support a family, and is happy living fifteen to a house for a few years before moving back to Poland with a large pot of money. Big business has no problem with this, nor do the left liberal elites who are happy to create an unemployed British underclass which can be relied on to keep foolishly voting for them, simply because they offer the highest rewards for enforced unemployment.

Â

Destroy the Nation State

This is more about the European Union than internal British politics, but it is very important. The unelected commissars who run the EU are fully aware they cannot control fully-functioning nation states, which is why the United Kingdom has been broken up into twelve regions. The pevious Labour government even went so far as to appoint Regional Ministers for each area. This destruction of our ancient counties and governance â€“ with the word 'England' actually removed from EU maps â€“ is otherwise known as 'Divide and Rule'.