The prosecution had requested a fine of €127,000 for the legal person – calculated at €100 for each day the offending articles were online (Photo Credit: STL under Creative Commons)

Judge Lettieri’s reasons have now been published. The two key paragraphs are as follows (internal footnotes omitted).

23. In determining the quantum of a fine to be imposed, I find relevant that Lebanese law contemplates a fine in the range of 10 to 30 million Lebanese Pounds for similar conduct, such as in cases where confidential judicial information is published.

24. Given the novelty of sentencing a legal person for contempt of an international tribunal, the foreseeability of the range of fines as set out in the Lebanese Law of Publications, as well as the separate penalty already imposed on Mr Al Amin as an individual, I find that a fine of 6,000 Euros – a quantum roughly equivalent to the minimum fine [10 million Lebanese Pounds] contemplated for a similarly- positioned Accused in Lebanese law – is appropriate in the circumstances to achieve the principles of retribution and deterrence of the corporate Accused’s conduct.

This reasoning raises some questions:

Should novelty of liability lead to leniency of sentence?

Is something amiss when the legal person’s sentence is 30% of that imposed on the natural person?

Although the possibility of convicting a legal person turned on Lebanese law, should the range of penalty be mandated by Lebanese provisions?

Should the natural person’s sentence be a relevant (and alleviating) factor when sentencing a legal person?

Let’s see whether the prosecution appeals….

On a related note, it looks unlikely that enforcing any fine will be a straightforward exercise. Also on the STL’s website is a recent report from the STL’s Registrar on attempts to formally notify the natural and legal persons of Judge Lettieri’s earlier judgment on liability. The following spells trouble for enforcement:

23 … the Lebanese authorities were unable to complete service on either the accused Mr Al Amin or the accused Akhbar Beirut S.A.L. The accused Mr Al Amin and the representatives for the accused Akhbar Beirut S.A.L. refused service when contacted by telephone. On 17 August 2016, the authorities proceeded to the offices of Akhbar Beirut S.A.L. where they were unable to complete service in person.