Corporate Welfare Bill Moves Ahead Despite Public Opposition

A bill to increase the amount of corporate welfare dollars to be distributed through the Job Development Investment Grant (JDIG) program is heading for passage. SB 2075 was approved by the House on July 16 and heads to the Senate. This in spite of wide public opposition to corporate welfare and the unfair nature of politicians playing favorites by bestowing tax dollars on corporations with the most political clout.

SUMMARY: In an election year, politicians would be wise to avoid increasing the widely unpopular practice of corporate welfare. When state government plays favorites in the market economy, those companies – often from out of state – with the best lobbyists are rewarded at the expense of home-grown businesses. Especially harmed are small business owners who are punished with a severe competitive disadvantage as they are forced to compete against large companies being showered with government handouts. Following are reasons why expanding JDIG would be a bad idea:

Strong public opposition

Civitas DecisionMaker poll results reveal that an overwhelming 80% of voters said they want North Carolina lawmakers to end the “practice of giving big corporations cash payments taken from the taxes paid by small businesses and average taxpayers.”

Further, a whopping 76% prefer that North Carolina “lower taxes for all businesses rather than provide cash incentives to a few big businesses” as a method of creating jobs.

Opposition to corporate welfare schemes comes from both ends of the political spectrum. Note the unified condemnation that both liberal and conservative groups heaped on last session’s Goodyear/Firestone deal.

Favoritism hurts home-grown businesses

Handing out special incentives to targeted corporations is an unfair practice that places other businesses at a competitive disadvantage

Those businesses not receiving tax breaks or handouts will be forced to shoulder a larger share of the tax burden

Corporate welfare is not an effective job-creation program

Government handouts divert scarce investment resources away from entrepreneurs who would most efficiently meet consumer needs toward companies more interested in government goodies

Real, sustainable job growth comes from profitable investment opportunities – not by propping up companies that can not survive without taxpayer subsidies

Thus, the JDIG program essentially equates to taxpayers from economically distressed parts of the state subsidizing further business development in the wealthiest parts of the state.

Commits to even more future spending, placing greater pressure on future budgets

Specifically, the extra $120 million of JDIG grants over the next twelve years commits the State to spending that will crowd out other priorities. This year’s budget proposal already commits more than $1.2 billion in future capital costs, adding another $120 million in commitments will only further tie the hands of future budget-makers.

Reader Interactions

Civitas encourages you to leave your comments and feedback related to the articles posted here. Civitas reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to remove any comments, including but not limited to comments that include abusive, vulgar, threatening or harassing language, or personal attacks of any kind. Off-topic comments or gratuitous links that could be viewed as spam are also subject to removal at our sole discretion. Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.