Can you give me the proof that the Dropa Stones are a Hoax, there are alot of sites that say they "could be a Hoax, but I haven't found one
that says it was a Hoax. And Surely to defame someone like Zacharia Stichin is so wrong. He is one of the few people on the planet that can translate
curiform tablets of the Sumerians. Show me where you got all of your info. What is your degree in?

Can you give me the proof that the Dropa Stones are a Hoax, there are alot of sites that say they "could be a Hoax, but I haven't found one
that says it was a Hoax. And Surely to defame someone like Zacharia Stichin is so wrong. He is one of the few people on the planet that can translate
curiform tablets of the Sumerians. Show me where you got all of your info. What is your degree in?

He's not on the planet anymore, thank God, and he couldn't even read Hebrew, although he was Jewish.

So you did a whole thread on defaming Samuel Kirland Lothorp and his work on the Costa Rica Stones. He was a spy for the USA not against. He
graduated from Harvard in Anthropology and Archaeology, and you said there was no record of him being either.

Originally posted by KandinskyGTFO Have you got a credible link to this story?

Here is the first reference...

Destroying the Evidence The evidence that humans actually lived with dinosaurs was too disturbing for two evolutionary scientists who, after
hearing Dr Patton at the 1989 science conference, immediately flew to Dallas, Texas, and the next day, using a crowbar, destroyed the remaining human
footprints in the riverbed. However, their quest was undone when the Texas drought of 1999 revealed another, even more dramatic trail of human and
dinosaur tracks together, the best archaeological artefacts yet to show that humans lived with the dinosaurs.

Hiya Z, you've stumbled into a Creationist honeytrap with that story. It's easily done going by that site. I can only assume the writer of
the article you quoted hadn't done their homework. There are one set of people claiming dinosaurs and humans shared the Earth and they tend to be
Young Earth Creationists.

The tracks are the well-known Paluxy dinosaur tracks. The 'Taylor Trail' was named after a Baptist Minister who put the tracks into a film and
claimed they were human. Ironically, Taylor and co apparently 'excavated' some prints. There's a little bout it here...

Shortly after the publication of Wilder-Smith's book, the human track claims came to the attention of Stanley Taylor, a Baptist minister who
owned a small apologetics film company called Films for Christ. Taylor decided to locate and film "man tracks" in the Paluxy riverbed itself as part
of a documentary on the Creation/Evolution controversy, and led a series of creationist expeditions to the Paluxy between 1968 and 1972 for this
purpose. Taylor’s interviews with local residents led him to question the loose tracks promoted by other creationists, but aided him in locating a
number of oblong markings on several sites which he and his coworkers (including representatives from other creationist groups) considered genuine
human tracks. Taylor's initial findings were reported in a series of articles published by the Bible-Science Association--a large creationist group,
hereafter referred to as BSA.

Threads like this one always have some great posts from different views. And I always enjoy them. But to the topic.

As much as I love science and the ologies, this is one branch of the ologies that just has too many Zahi Hawass's at the top. Anything that doesn't
fit the paradigm, gets dismissed or labeled a hoax. And once published as such, it's very hard to dispute. Which of course, is the point. That's not
to say that some things aren't rightly called hoaxes. But that word is thrown around too casually by these folks.

From my perspective, man has not progressed socially and technologically in a straight line as we are led to believe. I believe man has seen many
peaks and valleys historically. And has likely, at some points in the past, surpassed our current technology and social orders. And then took a nose
dive back into survival mode for a variety of reasons. Catastrophe, famine, natural disasters, wars, etc. That's not to say their society was
identical to our own. It wouldn't need to be. And that's not to say they were advanced in all the same ways we are. Different cultures put emphasis
and importance on different things. Even a look at todays world will tell you that. Our planet has seen many things in its history. And I suspect it
has seen us before too. And who knows how long ago, or how many times.

Originally posted by RuneSpider
The evidence for the Dropa stones, the pictures that are presented, are Chinese Jade Bi discs.
The Dropa people themselves are no diferent than any of the other peoples in the area.

AH! so let me see if I get this...

The stone discs are real, just have a different name...
The Dropa are real...

So you did a whole thread on defaming Samuel Kirland Lothorp and his work on the Costa Rica Stones. He was a spy for the USA not against. He graduated
from Harvard in Anthropology and Archaeology, and you said there was no record of him being either.

Perhaps you misunderstood the thread? There's no defaming of Lothrop and I clearly stated which 'side' he was working for as you can see here...

Lothrop was a genuine archaeologist and a secret agent working for the US Naval Intelligence in WW2. By the time he got to Costa Rica he'd been
working for none other than J. Edgar Hoover as part of the Special Intelligence Service (SIS). These guys were expected to engage in espionage,
grooming informants and destabilising 'anti-American' interests...the proto-CIA.

As for your other post...

Can you give me the proof that the Dropa Stones are a Hoax, there are alot of sites that say they "could be a Hoax, but I haven't found one that
says it was a Hoax. And Surely to defame someone like Zacharia Stichin is so wrong. He is one of the few people on the planet that can translate
curiform tablets of the Sumerians. Show me where you got all of your info. What is your degree in?

Firstly, I doubt you've looked or you wouldn't be asking the question. Secondly, I haven't mentioned Sitchen and there's little evidence he could
read Sumerian. Thirdly, my degree is irrelevant.

The Dropa Stones were described in a fictional book called Sungods in Exile. The author
described the book as fiction. The body of information in the sites you describe is from this book; scientists, Chinese professors and locations.

I'd provide more information, but you didn't ask nicely. Come back when you've started shaving and you've finished your homework.

Isn't it interesting that in your 'Dino did it" theory, that mysterious Dino has a stride that just happens to match that of a human?

Look again. The stride is longer than a human's by some distance. Dinosaurs came in all shapes and sizes with different gaits and left a variety of
tracks so the comparison to a human stride is kinda pointless....suggestive...but a straw man.

It has always impressed me that Adam & Eve getting kicked out of the land of milk and honey went right to it and built the great pyramids, myan
temples, and the cambodian temples, my god them 2 and there interbred family where buisy beavers now where they not

Then because of interbreeding problems we now have a variety of humans, to name a few, asians, Aborigines, blacks, and whites. My the insanity never
stops does it

Originally posted by Kandinsky
5 - The Baghdad Batteries are genuine clay pots, some few inches in height, with the capability of producing a 1.5v charge (iirc). There's some
discussion about whether they were designed to hold a charge.

The Baghdad Battery has pretty much been determined to have been a container designed to preserve a small scroll, which has since rotted away from
around it's metal rod core. That it produces an electric charge is just a coincidence due to the materials used.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.