nmm 22 4500ICPSR09671MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09671MiAaIMiAaI
Criminal Justice Outcomes of Male Offenders in 14 Jurisdictions in the United States, 1985-1988
[electronic resource]
Allan F. Abrahamse
,
Patricia A. Ebener
,
Stephen P. Klein
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR9671NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection provides information on multiple
prosecutions for individual offenders. The data are intended for use in
the exploration and description of relationships among the various
elements of the adjudication process (characteristics of the offender
and offense and decisions made by various actors in the prosecution and
sentencing of the offenders). The sampled incidents were drawn from two
types of offenses: residential burglary and armed robbery. The
collection includes only those incidents involving male offenders who
were previously unknown to their victims and who were facing
adjudication in adult court. The data collection instrument probed five
areas for each offender and incident sampled: A. Related Incidents
(information to identify all other incidents for which processing
overlapped that of the sampled incident), B. Incident Description
(information about the criminal incident itself, such as date and
location of the incident, date of arrest, victims, weapons,
accomplices, witnesses, and evidence), C. Adjudication Process
(information such as bond amount, legal representation, adjudication
events and outcomes, date of sentencing, and type and length of
incarceration), D. Defendant (information about the defendant himself,
including date of birth, race/descent, and employment status), and E.
Prior Record (information about the defendant's record, such as his age
at first arrest and first incarceration, the number of times he was
incarcerated, and history of drug and/or alcohol abuse).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09671.v1
armed robberyicpsrarrestsicpsrburglaryicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrjudicial processicpsrmale offendersicpsrprosecutionicpsrsentencingicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemAbrahamse, Allan F.Ebener, Patricia A.Klein, Stephen P.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9671Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09671.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09793MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s1992 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09793MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of a Repeat Offender Unit in Phoenix, Arizona, 1987-1989
[electronic resource]
Joan Petersilia
,
Allan F. Abrahamse
,
Patricia A. Ebener
,
Peter W. Greenwood
1992-10-31Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1992ICPSR9793NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a
Repeat Offender Unit in Phoenix. Repeat Offender Programs are
police-initiated procedures for patrolling and apprehending likely
offenders in communities. These units typically rely on the cooperation
of police and prosecutors who work together to identify, convict, and
incarcerate individuals who are judged likely to commit crimes,
especially serious crimes, at high rates. For this study, previous
offenders were assigned either to a control or an experimental group.
If an individual assigned to the experimental group was later arrested,
the case received special attention by the Repeat Offender Program.
Staff of the Repeat Offender Program worked closely with the county
attorney's office to thoroughly document the case and to obtain victim
and witness cooperation. If the individual was in the control group and
was later arrested, no additional action was taken by the Program
staff. Variables include assignment to the experimental or control
group, jail status, probation and parole status, custody status, number
of felony arrests, type of case, bond amount, number of counts against
the individual, type of counts against the individual, number of prior
convictions, arresting agency, case outcome, type of incarceration
imposed, and length of incarceration imposed.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09793.v1
prosecuting attorneysicpsrrecidivistsicpsrcriminal justice programsicpsrcriminality predictionicpsrpoliceicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IX. PolicePetersilia, JoanAbrahamse, Allan F.Ebener, Patricia A.Greenwood, Peter W.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9793Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09793.v1