> Thanks for doing this. I am going to review the patches in greater> detail and also test them. Why do you use configfs when we have a> control group filesystem available for grouping tasks and providing a> file system based interface for control and accounting?

And here I thought "There's more than one way to do it" was the Perl slogan. :)

An equally valid question would be: "Why are we carrying around a controlgroup filesystem when we have configfs?" (Honestly, I didn't know we *were*carrying around such a filesystem - and quite likely Andrea Righi didn'teither...)[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]