Localize Everythinghttps://localizeeverything.liberty.me
depoliticize all means of production through entrepreneurshipMon, 09 Oct 2017 18:05:54 +0000en-UShourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.4A Rejoinder to “The libertarian case for Rand Paul”https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/a-rejoinder-to-the-libertarian-case-for-rand-paul/
https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/a-rejoinder-to-the-libertarian-case-for-rand-paul/#commentsTue, 21 Apr 2015 07:13:44 +0000http://localizeeverything.liberty.me/?p=48First and foremost I am obligated, by my intellectual debt, to give thanks to Dr. Walter “The Moderate” Block. In his tome against the Sovietized system of roads, The Privatization of Roads & Highways, he showed me that my passionate attachment to State roads was equivalent to a passionate attachment to State production of bread. I shuddered. And with depoliticized roads, what can’t be depoliticized? Secondly, I must confess that in writing the title to this brief rejoinder, I did engage in a smidgen of click bait. I agree with 99.9999% of Dr. Block’s defense of Senator Rand Paul. But, we are not here to agree about everything. Let’s look at the text in question. Yet, some libertarians are so disappointed in Rand that they have publicly stated they would vote for Hillary rather than him. This, surely, is pique, not rationality. This is the case for preferring Baddie to Goodie. This is psychological perturbation, not sensible libertarian strategy. This is barking madness. Do I think Rand Paul running for POTUS is a net positive? Yes. Would I be delighted if he became POTUS? Yes. Then, where the bloody hell is the point of contention? Dr. Block’s approach to presidential politics is a 180 degree turn from his position on the roads. Dr. Block says that public-private partnerships with roads are harmful because they give the illusion of market processes, which slows down the failure of the nationalized production of roads. What is a president, if not the central figure of the nationalized production of security and law? If it is better that the system of roads crashes on the watch of the current rulers, then it also is better for the security and law production of the U.S. to crash under their watch. If not, then incrementalism in road production is a net positive. If the former is true, vote Clinton. If the latter is true, vote Paul. This has further implications for whether or not libertarians should advocate the abolition of drug laws without the abolition of the State monopoly on law and security production, but I will put that issue aside for now as your mind masticates on it. I do not know which strategic position is superior, but I have qualms with one being called ‘pique’, ‘not rationality’, ‘psychological perturbation’, ‘barking madness’, and ‘not sensible’ without valid and sound argumentation. Maybe I’m too ecumenical.

]]>https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/a-rejoinder-to-the-libertarian-case-for-rand-paul/feed/2President Obama: The Good, The Bad & The Ugly Regarding Cubahttps://localizeeverything.liberty.me/president-obama-the-good-the-bad-the-ugly-regarding-cuba/
https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/president-obama-the-good-the-bad-the-ugly-regarding-cuba/#commentsWed, 17 Dec 2014 22:50:22 +0000http://localizeeverything.liberty.me/?p=43The world tells you the good news first then disappoints you with bad news. Though my title is in this earthly style, I prefer the style of the holy writings. They tell you the bad first, then the good. The Ugly: The U.S. regime’s new agreement with the Cuban regime includes an expansion of the Drug War and State solutions to the environment. There is nothing I can say about the ills of the Drug War that has not already been said by more well-informed writers. It’s ugly. Libertarians should not ignore the problems of the environment, but they are not to be resolved by top-to-bottom thinking coercive State bureaucrats. The environment should be protected through stronger protection of private property, a la the Institute of Justice and not the Keystone Pipeline. Pollution is an invasion of property rights, and should be treated as such in consensual courts. Mediators and arbitrators can render awards for you in these cases. The Bad: Tourists are still not allowed to travel freely to Cuba. There are arbitrary State mandated limits on the costs of goods you can import from Cuba. There are arbitrary State mandated limits on the amount of remittances you can send to your loved ones on the island of Cuba. The Good: The New York Times says that family visits, official visits, journalistic, professional, educational and religious activities, and public performances will all have looser arbitrarily mandated State limits on them. You can now import more tobacco, alcohol and other Cuban products. I congratulated President Obama when he made strides toward abolishing immigration laws (border apartheid), and I congratulate President Obama now when he is making strides toward abolishing the embargo on Cuba. I am an abolitionist. Abolition is not just about slavery. Abolishing slavery was good, but so would abolishing the embargo on Cuba be. If you respect consent, then you should be outraged that the consensual exchanges betwixt Cubans and Americans are being forcibly prohibited by the United States’ regime. If you believe State Socialism will collapse on its head then prove it by fully liberating consensual exchanges with Cuba. Senator Marco Rubio’s recent comments on Cuba show his economic illiteracy and unthinking bigotry toward the Castro family. Senator Rubio shows us his disdain for the freed market by publicly disagreeing with President Obama’s move. Does Rubio think State Socialism can out-compete the freed market? There are legion diktats of President Obama that are wrong, but we should give credit when credit is due. Kudos President Obama, and shame on you Senator Rubio. cash loans online loan company instant loans online loans online instant approval small personal loans with bad credit secured credit cards for bad credit

]]>https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/president-obama-the-good-the-bad-the-ugly-regarding-cuba/feed/1Cheap levitra in canada Licenses for Eye Doctors Hurt the Poorhttps://localizeeverything.liberty.me/licenses-for-eye-doctors-hurt-the-poor/
https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/licenses-for-eye-doctors-hurt-the-poor/#commentsThu, 04 Dec 2014 00:57:59 +0000http://localizeeverything.liberty.me/?p=41The words ophthalmologist and optometrist are in my diction, but the accessibility of the term eye doctor seems more apropos for a title that I pray you share. The libertarian tradition is that grand tale of power versus the market. We are the market, and this battle takes the largest toll on the least (financially speaking) of our brethren and sistren, the poor. When it comes to eyesight improvement, we are talking about a major function of everyday life. Licenses for eye doctors hurt the poor. Yesterday I went to my eye doctor’s office. I spent five minute waiting for them to re-open their shop after a lunch break. Then I spent ten minutes with an eye nurse being examined, and having her answer my onslaught of questions regarding the field. The amount of my questions tend to embitter people close to me, but thanks to His goodwill she was at least not outwardly bothered. And I’m no schmuck when it comes to reading people. She told me the eye doctor would arrive shortly, and I knew shortly was being loosely interpreted. I was right. I waited forty minutes for the eye doctor to arrive. Once he did, his session with me lasted no more than six minutes. When communicating liberty to our neighbors it is critical that we follow the lead of CopBlock, Cody Wilson and Amir Taaki. CopBlock deals with police power. Wilson deals with guns. Taaki deals with currency. They strive to be the best they are at what they do. I have progressives retweeting and sharing CopBlock posts on my social media timelines, and I’m sure they would be appalled if they knew how anarchistic CopBlock is. That doesn’t matter. CopBlock exposes the State for the menace that it is in one highly focused area of study. We should take this cue, and tear apart every argument for State power in one field. With all of us specializing in different areas, the State has no hope. Licenses for eye doctors hurt the poor. There is nothing the eye doctor could do for me that I would want him to do for me that the eye nurses could not do. Licenses for eye doctors are a protection racket. Whilst I was in that tiny room waiting for forty minutes I got the esteemed privilege to stare at his myriad degrees and State qualifications. Disgusting. That he achieves stirs no qualms with me. But, why is his ilk afraid of competition? If we abolished all State qualifications for becoming an eye doctor what would happen? The majority of eye related health services would be run by firms and cooperatives of eye nurses. These nurses’ salaries would rise, and the doctors’ salaries would shrink. The consumers who lack this care the most, the poor, would get more affordable frames, lenses, contacts and eye healthcare. What are their concerns? The same ideology that mired the US military in Bush Jr.’s Iraq War, and spawned the fascist caliphate known as ISIS, is at work here. The ideology is called the pre-emptive strike (think Minority Report & Psycho-Pass for you pop culture aficionados). The bureaucrats believe that eye health producers could harm us if they were not jumping through the sacrosanct hoops of the State. On the off chance that eye health producers harm consumers, the State says they have to filer them at expense of the poor. The opposite of the pre-emptive strike ideology is the ideology that says render adjudicatory awards against people who commit offenses, not everyone who has the potential to offend. Alas, for now, we live in the world of the pre-emptive strikers. Talk to your neighbors (everyone) about eye healthcare. Tell them that costs would be lower, nurses would get paid more, and there would be more jobs from lower-skilled workers. Look at the ethnic make-up of eye nurses in your community versus that of the eye doctors. Reducing State power in this field would reduce that disparity, even if it did not make it non-existent. Just start a conversation about this subject with the words licenses for eye doctors hurt the poor. Post Scriptum: I just bought spectacles from Warby Parker. They pay me in no way, shape or form but I like appreciating entrepreneurs that stand with the community. Their glasses are hip, affordable ($95-$125), try to be responsible to the environment and help poor people in the 3rd world have access to spectacles. Peep their video promoting their 1 millionth sale back in June. generic name levitra levitra for cheap buy

]]>https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/licenses-for-eye-doctors-hurt-the-poor/feed/4An Ode to Amir Taakihttps://localizeeverything.liberty.me/an-ode-to-amir-taaki/
https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/an-ode-to-amir-taaki/#commentsTue, 02 Dec 2014 09:27:49 +0000http://localizeeverything.liberty.me/?p=35Amir Taaki is mostly known for founding DarkWallet and DarkMarket (now OpenBazaar). He has his faults, like all of us, but he’s brilliant. Listening to him talk, especially if he’s with Cody Wilson, is an intellectual treat. DarkWallet lets you hide your consensual Bitcoin exchanges, and OpenBazaar is a P2P marketplace for everything. The State’s days are truly numbered. Listening to Taaki, I see some similar influences that I have. I came to liberty from the left. Liberty is more left, if left and right mean anything, but I mean I grew up an anti-authoritarian Democrat. A Jeremy Scahill if you will. By the way, I’ll take a principled State hating anti-authoritarian as an ally before I count a consequences based libertarian like Gary Johnson. I said I see something of myself in Taaki. The link above is a show called I am Anarchy. But, when asked if he is an anarchist he says no. Truly, truly I say to you, Taaki is apolitical. I’m working with Oppenheimer’s definition of the term. The political means is the violent means, and the economic means is the peaceful and transactional means. The division of labor does call for us to work for liberty in different ways, but I agree with Taaki when he says that the electoral process is flooded with our efforts. There is such thing as misallocation of our resources. Taaki eschews the label anarchist for the label anti-fascist. To me that is equivalent with anti-authoritarianism, and it is a welcome building block. His anti-fascism encourages him to want to have hidden e-mail, hidden currencies, hidden businesses and pay no taxes. You would call that anarchy, or anarcho-capitalism, but he does not prefer those labels. I don’t think he’s ignorant of the labels, but he spends his time differently. Instead of writing 30 articles a month and arguing on lengthy threads about how many thick libertarians and thin libertarians could dance on the pin of a needle, he’s developing our means of thwarting State intervention into money. We need more Amir Taakis, and less petty squabblers. Karl Hess has a wondrous essay called Anarchy without hyphens. Here it is in audio format. It’s 5 minutes. Listen to it. The gist of it is that we should be open to dissent if we are truly anarchists. Wave the black flag and be totally against the State. Don’t say you’re an anarcho-capitalist. Don’t say you’re an anarcho-communist. Our tiny shibboleths fail to ooze out the many meanings we wish they did to strangers. No compact phrase will have enough nuance and context. Always be ready to lucidly and tersely defend the hope that is inside you. The very hope that Jeffrey Tucker and Kevin Carson always display when talking about liberty and the future. I think Taaki does not like the word anarchy, because he hesitates to be a part of an established group of thought. We wants freedom of movement, as is obvious with the work he is doing with DarkWallet. Calling himself an anti-fascist works, because it’s like saying “I want to do it my way not your way.” It’s understandable. Mussolini and Hitler were fascists, and so people who emulate their lust for total State power will be the opposite of Taaki’s ilk. Look at the emblem of DarkWallet and you will see Taaki’s ideology. Inversion. He inverted the so-called illuminati or ruling class masons’ NWO pyramid. I welcome him and all anti-fascists to the libertarian tradition. If you hate the State, you are surely my friend.

]]>https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/an-ode-to-amir-taaki/feed/3There are Not a Lot of Black Faces in the Liberty Movementhttps://localizeeverything.liberty.me/there-are-not-a-lot-of-black-faces-in-the-liberty-movement/
https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/there-are-not-a-lot-of-black-faces-in-the-liberty-movement/#commentsTue, 25 Nov 2014 07:42:28 +0000http://localizeeverything.liberty.me/?p=32There are not a lot of black faces in the liberty movement. Yes, I know who Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams are. There are not enough. Accept that, and let’s move on. I am one of these faces. When ethnic tensions rise over social media, and this has happened frequently in the past couple of years, it is due to State power smashing against black men and women. Black communities and their allies are outraged with the State, and some normally liberty minded folk strangely argue the merits and defend the State. Don’t defend the State. Focus the anger of the blacks at the injustices of the State, and show them that it is a part of a larger context in which the State oppresses all people that do not feed at its trough. First they have to get as mad as Hell and commit to not taking it anymore. Then, you tell them that the State’s incompetency is not only in the production of bread that the Soviets and Maoists learned about, but also in the production of courts and security (policing). You tell them that we have to consensually produce alternative, non-State, courts and security firms for profit and nonprofit. You tell them that crypto-anarchy, crypto-email and crypto-currencies will help us do this as the State decays. Whatever you say, give them a positive alternative. Don’t just be mad at the State. Offer the better solution lucidly and tersely. That’s how liberty wins. I did this on Facebook this evening. Being black helps, but is not necessary. Do your part. Below is how I framed it. the creation of a direct, personal accountability between each government employee and every member of the community would effectively bring the business of government to a speedy halt. Yes, the State does not like black people. The larger context is that the State does not likes any of us, unless we bow down and burn incense before it. The above quote is from WARREN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. That is the case that codifies Police not needing to protect you. The State is only concerned with the ‘business’ of government. The ‘business’ of the State is theft. The State is not your friend. ‪#‎Ferguson #Missouri‬ #Blacklivesmatter

]]>https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/there-are-not-a-lot-of-black-faces-in-the-liberty-movement/feed/8Subversives in Life Imitate Subversives on the Screenhttps://localizeeverything.liberty.me/subversives-in-life-imitate-subversives-on-the-screen/
https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/subversives-in-life-imitate-subversives-on-the-screen/#commentsThu, 20 Nov 2014 23:00:54 +0000http://localizeeverything.liberty.me/?p=30Welcome to the wonderful world of entertainment Where art, imitate, life and people get famous Jurassic 5’s Quality Control was my first hip-hop album. There was a time when mainstream hip-hop was subversive, and even today there are subversive emcees. Immortal Technique and Lowkey come to mind first, but there are plenty out there. Art imitates life. I believe it, and so should you. http://theantimedia.org/mockingjay-banned-in-thai-theaters-after-inspiring-real-life-dissent/ Read that link. Thai student groups distribute free tickets to go watch the new Hunger Games film with the contingency that consumers consider the similarities betwixt the current Thai regime and the fictional regime from Hunger Games. The idea is to draw connections betwixt oppressive measures. If you are captivated by a film and empathize with marginalized anti-authoritarians, why not apply this empathy to to the struggle in real life (irl). Irl the oppressive regimes around the world are not of a different kind than the regime in Hunger Games. These regimes are only different in degree and style. When watching movies, reading books and listening to music be alert. The grand libertarian tradition is added to by conscious and unconscious supporters. The libertarian tradition hates the State. Stories and narratives work better than abstract arguments at convincing people to hate the State. We should tell people stories about oppression and liberty. We should tell people stories about coercively centralized power and the ever decentralizing consensual market process. Each story we tell will help the larger narrative of illuminating the wickedness of the State. “The State is not your friend”, we say to our neighbors after highlighting a police beating, NSA spying, municipalities silencing tour guides and committing land-theft et cetera. Then we don our Cheshire Cat grins as our new society’s growth, within the old decaying corporate-capitalist society, increases inexorably. The Sun will inevitably shatter the darkness.

]]>https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/subversives-in-life-imitate-subversives-on-the-screen/feed/220mg levitra safe How can a Subversive Anarchist vote?https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/how-can-a-subversive-anarchist-vote/
https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/how-can-a-subversive-anarchist-vote/#commentsTue, 04 Nov 2014 06:06:34 +0000http://localizeeverything.liberty.me/?p=28The conforming nonconformist anarchists have let their voices be heard all across the nether regions of the internets. For a gaggle of atheists they sure do religiously chant “Don’t vote!” and mockingly #VoteHarder . Regarding the moral reprehension of voting for any ‘representatives’ and senators in CA, I agree. Regarding judges, I have not read enough about them to make any informed decisions. But, and I mean the most gargantuan but possible, voting on measures can affect change that lovers of liberty want to see in the world. Do you want the prison industrial complex reduced? Do you want theft to be kept as low as permitted? Do you want to reduce the market intrusions by czars and commissars? If your answer is no, let the system crash, then kudos on your consistency. You’d have to say the same about the wars though. If your answer is yes, stop whining, I made voting easier for you (if you’re in CA). Just vote on the measures. Mostly against them. Vote Like This Yes on Prop 47 to reduce prison penalties on what should not be illegal in the first place. Prop 48 is corporatist which ever way you vote. No on Prop 1, don’t need CA bonds. No on Prop 2, rearranges stolen money and increases the top-down approach to schooling. HELL NAH on Prop 45, never give corporatist Insurance commissars any power. No on Prop 46, we regulate doctors and all other professions best with prices, not with whimsical flaming hoops provided by bureaucrats who lust for power. I know nothing of the judges to say whether or not they would help. Look up the propositions of CA to learn the context. split levitra pills canadian online pharmacies take viagra levitra together acquista levitra online compare levitra prices buy viagra cialis levitra price

]]>https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/how-can-a-subversive-anarchist-vote/feed/3Depoliticize the Courts, and the Paper Tiger Fallshttps://localizeeverything.liberty.me/depoliticize-the-courts-and-the-paper-tiger-falls/
https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/depoliticize-the-courts-and-the-paper-tiger-falls/#respondMon, 03 Nov 2014 20:01:42 +0000http://localizeeverything.liberty.me/?p=26When we depoliticize the coercively monopolized courts, the paper tiger that is the State will truly wither away. Depoliticization is the process of removing sole control of a means of production from the tentacles of the State. I do not refer to the State auctions that benefit the buyers that are artificially supported by State power over the rest of us who do not feed at the swine barrel legislative trough for our breakfast, brunch, lunch, linner, dinner and midnight snacks. I study appropriate dispute resolution, and I recently completed a paper on arbitrability. Arbitrability is that which is and is not permitted to be subject to arbitration within any given State. In South Africa, you are not allowed to submit intellectual ‘property’ issues to arbitration. In France, you can, if and only if it is an ancillary issue to the main subject of arbitration. In Belgium, you have the liberty to arbitrate intellectual ‘property’ disputes directly. Why do I mention this? The doctrinal views of these States regarding arbitrability is arbitrary. The only standard that can be deemed independent and objective, in regards to what is ‘fair’, is the consent of two or more mutually exchanging adults – whether for currency or non-currency values. If mutual exchange is rooted in consent, then each State would permit 100% arbitrability. That means every behavior, including murder and theft, that displeases society could be sent to the coercive courts of the State or the consensual courts of negotiators, mediators and arbitrators. If we win on this argument on this issue, we get everything else that we want. Decriminalization of drugs? Decriminalization of tour-giving? Decriminalization of raw milk production? Decriminalization of hair-braiding? Decriminalization of advice-giving? It would all be decriminalized if we decriminalized arbitrability. Priorities matter. Especially, when it comes to educating our neighbors, and the people already within the liberty community. Walter “Moderate” Block cryogenically froze me when he verbally illustrated that I was vehemently opposed to the sovietized production of shoes, pencils, foods and cars but unabashedly marketed the sovietized production of the roads. If we understand that sovietized production of shoes, pencils, foods and cars is damned to fail because of the incalculability of prices under the total State control of the means of production, then this argument works for the production of roads and courts as well. If you believe that total State control of the means of production aids us consumers the most, then you will not want 100% arbitrability. If you believe that prices are the only sane way to know how many shoes, pencils, foods and cars to produce, then the same can be said of the courts, and you want 100% arbitrability. Futurist inventor Buckminister Fuller says you never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete. Queer black feminist Audrey Lorde says For the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. They may allow us to temporarily beat him at his own game, but they will never enable us to bring about genuine change. The Preamble to the Industrial Workers of the World’s constitution says we are forming the structure of the new society within the shell of the old. The words of Lorde, Fuller and the IWW bolster the 100% liberation of arbitrability from the shackles of the State. Whether the legislatures act or not, entrepreneurial enterprises such as Bitrated and OpenBazaar will fully liberate arbitrability. Technology is on the side of We the People, not the controllers and rulers. The future of liberty is absolutely luminous. Without trying to convince legislatures that we should have consensual courts, 100% arbitrability is the pot and soil from which our new world of appropriate dispute resolution shall blossom, and like the Venus flytrap that it is, mercilessly swallow the existing corporate-capitalist structure whole. Post Scriptum: for your viewing pleasure I have provided you with ordered roads without traffic lights that show human ingenuity without goons with guns and horn loudspeakers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEIn8GJIg0E

]]>https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/depoliticize-the-courts-and-the-paper-tiger-falls/feed/0The NSA & CITIZENFOUR: 2014’s Tom & Jerryhttps://localizeeverything.liberty.me/the-nsa-citizenfour-2014s-tom-jerry/
https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/the-nsa-citizenfour-2014s-tom-jerry/#respondThu, 30 Oct 2014 02:17:37 +0000http://localizeeverything.liberty.me/?p=23CITIZENFOUR is Edward Snowden. The NSA & Snowden are respectively like Tom and Jerry. Do you remember who won? The Bad: When you use the Caps Lock key we know to listen to you attentively. This is because of the time-tested axiom that shouting wins all arguments at all times and in all places. Like the all-caps of the title, anti-authoritarian Pulitzer Prize winning director Laura Poitras’ documentary CITIZENFOUR has a whiff of blemishes. There are a dab of scenes of the NSA’s coercively sustained lands shot at night with the most dire-sounding background music this side of the Mississippi River. She has artistic liberty to shoot the film how she wants to, and no one can tell a story absent of biases, but I think day-time shots and revelations about the NSA are equally if not more chilling to an audience than dramatic night shots backed by dramatic music. The Good: I feel almost silly in telling you that this is a film you should watch if you are against unaccountable and power hungry elitists who want to learn every facet of your life down to the length of your eyelashes and the velocity at which your fecal matter hits the water of your toilet. Almost. Go watch it. Whilst Laura Poitras may or may not be a ‘pure’ libertarian in the eyes of the liberty movement’s thought police, she clearly and proudly displays her inveterate antipathy to the coercively monopolized system of court, security and road production that we fondly refer to as the State. Poitras is positively radical. She hates the State. I don’t know if the majority of the people in the United States of America will ever want to see the withering away of the State. I believe in the ability of most people to think critically if given enough attention and evidence. Poitras’ film has evidence after evidence after evidence that the NSA, and thus the State, is not your friend. She shows former NSA Director Keith Alexander explicitly lying, before oath, to the American people. She shows that though there were calls for Snowden to come to the U.S. for ‘justice’ in the coercive courts, there was no legal chance of him winning. The law does not care if Snowden helped We The People, or if the State lied, or if no harm could be proved by Snowden’s actions. Additionally, we get to see Pulitzer Prize winning anti-authoritarian journalist Glenn Greenwald’s verbal blitz, in English and in Portuguese, against the Panopticon NSA that is not only peeping whilst you are sleeping, but whilst Germany’s Chancellor Merkel, Brazil and the United Kingdom are sleeping as well. We get to hear George Polk Award winning anti-authoritarian investigative reporter Jeremy Scahill hint at his whistleblowing source from a different branch of the State than the NSA. We get to hear the testimony of Lavabit (now Dark Mail) founder Ladar Levinson tell us what he did when the State tried to shut him down for providing his crypto-email service for Snowden. All that is appropriate for me to do is applaud Poitras, watch her other documentaries and tell you all to do the same, so that we may expose as many people as is humanly possible to the antisocial nature of the NSA, and the State writ large.

]]>https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/the-nsa-citizenfour-2014s-tom-jerry/feed/0Make Liberty Go Viral by Engaging the Viralhttps://localizeeverything.liberty.me/make-liberty-go-viral-by-engaging-the-viral/
https://localizeeverything.liberty.me/make-liberty-go-viral-by-engaging-the-viral/#respondWed, 22 Oct 2014 18:09:16 +0000http://localizeeverything.liberty.me/?p=19http://www.upworthy.com/a-little-girl-waved-at-him-he-didnt-wave-back-because-shes-gay-his-dad-responded-appropriately If we love liberty, we have to engage the culture. Our viewpoint is inter-disciplinary in the best way imaginable. Liberty can add to discussions of music, film, poetry, politics, philosophy, language, economics, and areas that I know nothing about. I know a smidgen about spoken-word poetry from my sparse attendance at the Last Book Store’s open mic nights, Da Poetry Lounge and even an exclusively Christian spoken-word show. Find the viral, and engage the discussion with your liberty loving eyes, ears and olfactories. G. Yamazawa’s ballad against bigotry in “Elementary” (the link above), like most talented spoken-word-poetry, tells a story whilst dropping snap-worthy one-liners. How could I possibly restrain my fingers from snapping when I hear before the pledge of allegiance molested my lips G. Yamazawa’s acerbic analogy lucidly tells us the nature of compulsory schooling by the United States’ government. Compulsory schooling is a molester and a rapist in the truest sense of these terms. Nowadays, consent is not the only measuring instrument of whether or not molestation or rape is occurring. There are mental mountebanks and cranial charlatans fearmongering the masses into thinking rape happens more frequently than it does by maliciously changing the definition of rape to include consensual sexual acts persuaded by the promise to end a relationship… which is now called talking or catching feelings in the millennial nomenclature. When rape is evident, justice demands that we speak on her behalf. Truancy laws and the statolatrous pledge of allegiance that our children are subjected to five days a week are intolerable practices for lovers of diversity and consent.* To highlight this last point about diversity see G. Yamazawa’s “Supa Dupa Fly Freestyle” and hear him say I never knew I was a shogun cuz in school I only learned about the romans. what up my Samoan homies? what up my Hawaiian homies? What’s the alternative? Homeschooling, trade schools, parochial (including secular) for-profit schools, nonprofit schools and B-corporation schools all grounded in consent. Post Scriptum: Nobody fights rape better than RAINN (Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network). If you want to join the fight, read their research. *idolatry of the State