Comments

crazybird
10:08am Tue 21 Jan 14

Someone being terminally ill with cancer is not mitigating circumstances! It's a poor excuse! If someone is terminally ill with cancer it would be more sensible not to drink so if you needed to go and visit them at short notice you wouldn't be in this position. No sympathy whatsoever!

Someone being terminally ill with cancer is not mitigating circumstances! It's a poor excuse! If someone is terminally ill with cancer it would be more sensible not to drink so if you needed to go and visit them at short notice you wouldn't be in this position. No sympathy whatsoever!crazybird

Someone being terminally ill with cancer is not mitigating circumstances! It's a poor excuse! If someone is terminally ill with cancer it would be more sensible not to drink so if you needed to go and visit them at short notice you wouldn't be in this position. No sympathy whatsoever!

Score: 14

John T
11:12am Tue 21 Jan 14

Poor excuse maybe, but it will get you a shorter driving ban if you can afford a solicitor to represent you.
We are all in this together.

Poor excuse maybe, but it will get you a shorter driving ban if you can afford a solicitor to represent you.
We are all in this together.John T

Poor excuse maybe, but it will get you a shorter driving ban if you can afford a solicitor to represent you.
We are all in this together.

Score: 9

crazybird
11:29am Tue 21 Jan 14

That may be the case. One of the more concerning things is that she was working as a carer whilst over the drink drive limit - I wouldn't want her looking after one of my nearest and dearest :(

That may be the case. One of the more concerning things is that she was working as a carer whilst over the drink drive limit - I wouldn't want her looking after one of my nearest and dearest :(crazybird

That may be the case. One of the more concerning things is that she was working as a carer whilst over the drink drive limit - I wouldn't want her looking after one of my nearest and dearest :(

Score: 10

John T
11:53am Tue 21 Jan 14

crazybird wrote…

That may be the case. One of the more concerning things is that she was working as a carer whilst over the drink drive limit - I wouldn't want her looking after one of my nearest and dearest :(

Yes, but 'working as a carer' could have been hyped up either by her legal representative or the Echo, and she may have been just returning home after celebrating the New Year with her sister.
As so often, we may just have part of the story from the Echo.

[quote][p][bold]crazybird[/bold] wrote:
That may be the case. One of the more concerning things is that she was working as a carer whilst over the drink drive limit - I wouldn't want her looking after one of my nearest and dearest :([/p][/quote]Yes, but 'working as a carer' could have been hyped up either by her legal representative or the Echo, and she may have been just returning home after celebrating the New Year with her sister.
As so often, we may just have part of the story from the Echo.John T

crazybird wrote…

That may be the case. One of the more concerning things is that she was working as a carer whilst over the drink drive limit - I wouldn't want her looking after one of my nearest and dearest :(

Yes, but 'working as a carer' could have been hyped up either by her legal representative or the Echo, and she may have been just returning home after celebrating the New Year with her sister.
As so often, we may just have part of the story from the Echo.

Ipsoregulated

This website and associated newspapers adhere to the Independent Press Standards Organisation's Editors' Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about the editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then please contact the editor here. If you are dissatisfied with the response provided you can contact IPSO here