What is the Use of Bologna in National Reform?

Few national higher education systems or policies can claim to operate in total isolation from their international environment. Systemic changes and policy shifts in higher education are linked in various ways to what is happening in the international arena, as well as to developments in other national systems. This chapter discusses one such linkage; it explores how a process of higher education policy co- operation at the European level, the Bologna Process, has impacted in practice on the comprehensive reform of Norwegian higher education of the late 1990s and the beginning of this century known as the Quality Reform; and questions the extent to which the reform proposals that are part of the Quality Reform are a response to the Bologna Process, and how ‘Bologna’ was used in the context of this national reform.

The Norwegian higher education system is located on the northern periphery of Europe. Given this location and the ongoing Europeanisation of higher education, the Norwegian government and other stakeholders concerned with higher education are putting increasing political emphasis on the importance of internationalising higher education, and especially on strengthening its ties with Europe. In this the Bologna Process, being a part of the Europeanisation development, has received considerable attention. An important assumption in this chapter is that the nature of the peripheral status of Norway might have conditioned the use, and therefore ultimately the effects of the Bologna Process in the Norwegian Quality Reform.

Keywords

High Education High Education System High Education Policy European High Education Area Degree Structure

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Böllhoff, D. (2002) The New Regulatory Regime: The Institutional Design of Telecommunications Regulation at the National Level. In A. Héretier (ed.) Common Goods—Reinventing European and International Governance. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar

Callon, M. (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: the domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc bay. In J. Law (ed.): Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Dolowitz, D. P. and D. Marsh. (2000) Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 13(1), pp. 5-24.Google Scholar

Neave, G. (2003) The Bologna Declaration: Some of the Historic Dilemmas Posed by the Reconstruction of the Community in Europe’s Systems of Higher Education. Educational Policy 17(1), pp. 41-164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmonds, P., Teather, S., Östling, A. (2001) RCN and International Research Cooperation. Background report No 6 in the evaluation of the Research Council of Norway Brighton: Technopolis Ltd. December 2001.Google Scholar

Wendt, K. (2003) Participation of ‘the Periphery’ in international research collaboration—based on Norwegian experiences. Paper presented at 7th International Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation. Monterrey, Mexico, 10-13 June 2003.Google Scholar