No? Give him a couple more years, maybe he can take it into 2020, so the Dems will have something to talk about other than a real agenda...

So you investigate someone for theft and you find out he's a murderer...are you really that blase about corruption in the United States by the man who holds the highest office, his family, his friends, his trusted confidants and his cronies? Do you really give him a pass for everything you are watching because he cut taxes? When exactly would you feel comfortable holding him accountable? Would you truly feel ok if he went and pardoned Manafort, or his son if he's indicted? Cheers!

Except theft, even if it's on the grandest scale, is not equal to murder. Going from theft to murder is a giant step up. Which is a very different situation than going from collusion/treasom to whatever petty nonsense they've come up with here. In all cases a big step down. I mean seriously, if this all wraps up and the biggest whale that came from this was that Manafort cheated on his taxes and lobbied for Eastern European countries, independent of the 2016 election... then IDK how you can't consider this whole thing a massive hoax and fraudulent partisan witch hunt.

Did anyone hear about how Comey has now verified there was ZERO EFFORT to verify the Steele Dossier before issuing wire taps on the Trump campaign? Haven't heard any of the neighborhood liberals chime in on that...

The goal of the Mueller investigation was very clear: Find the Russian collusion with Trump that caused the election to be thrown Trump's way.

Remember - Hillary LOST the election because Russia influenced millions of votes. She did not lose the electionbecause she was a terrible candidate. The election was clearly rigged by the collusion. The purpose of Muellerinvestigation is to find the collusion and influence. Trump is NOT a legitimate democratically elected President of the United States.

Money laundering and conflicts of interestThere have long been credible allegations that Russian money was laundered through the Trump Organization. If Russia could show that Trump, his business or his immediate family had benefited from tainted money or broken the law — or if Trump believed they could — it would mean that Russia could exert pressure on Trump to influence U.S. foreign policy.

The president’s behavior has done nothing to allay these concerns, including his inexplicable conduct in Helsinki, when he sided with Putin over his own intelligence agencies and appeared to accept Russia's mendacious denial of involvement in the 2016 election.

But the concern goes beyond Russia, and extends to broader questions of financial conflict of interest. Following the murder of U.S. resident and Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi by Saudi Arabia, Trump has sought to excuse Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Is the president’s deference to Saudi Arabia based on geopolitical or security concerns, or is it based on his own financial interests? Although the president now denies having any financial ties to the Saudis, just a short time ago he was bragging about the many tens of millions of dollars the Saudis were spending on his apartments and how much he favored them as a result.