'Censorship has reached small town America'

'Dreams from My Real Father' proves hot to handle for tiny Midwest city

A tea party group in Fairfield, Iowa, had put up posters, advertised
and spoken on the radio, excited about bringing filmmaker Joel Gilbert
to town to show and answer questions about his Obama exposé, “Dreams from My Real Father."

But then rumors of complaints began to circulate in this small city
of 9,464, and controversy erupted. Only days before the Oct. 13 event,
The Fairfield Arts & Convention Center, where the film was to be
shown, cancelled the event until its board could evaluate whether such a
politically hot-topic film would violate the Center’s non-profit
status.

“Censorship has reached small town America, not just major metros
where Democrats have more control,” Gilbert told WND at the time.
“Iowa’s the middle of country; if we have censorship in little towns
there, is there any hope for the First Amendment?”

Gilbert told WND the tea party group was suddenly out all its
advertising dollars, and the plane ticket to Iowa he held in his hand
was rendered pointless.

Four days after the event was scheduled to take place,
however, the Center relented and agreed the film could be shown after
all – with a few conditions.

“The promoter must present a clear disclaimer stating that the
viewpoints represented in the film are those of the filmmaker and do not
represent the viewpoints of the Center and that the movie contains
subject matter that may be deemed offensive by some viewers,” the
Center’s board of directors announced. “In turn, the Center will
continue to offer others the right to rent the facility on the same
basis, including standard rental fee, as it is being offered to this
promoter. In addition, the Center will not sell tickets or promote or
publicize the film in any manner.”

“We don’t want to limit political speech,” Rob Steinberg, the
Center’s chairman of the board, told the Fairfield Ledger, “but limit
the manner in which it is presented, because we don’t want to engage in
political advocacy.”

Even though a Center donor reported the facility had previously shown
“An Inconvenient Truth” from Al Gore and Michael Moore’s “Fahrenheit
911,” Center Director Rustin Lippincott told the Ledger he’s never
received the amount of public feedback that this screening of “Dreams from My Real Father” has prompted.

“This is something that has never come to us before,” Lippincott said. “This is uncharted waters.”

Gilbert’s
description of the film may reveal why it’s so controversial: “‘Dreams
from My Real Father’ demonstrates that Obama has a deeply disturbing
family background, which he intentionally obscured, to hide a Marxist
political foundation.

‘Dreams from My Real Father’ is the story Barack
Obama should have told, revealing his true agenda for ‘fundamentally
transforming America.’”

Gilbert’s film shows how Obama sold himself to America as the
multicultural ideal, a man who stood above politics. His father was a
goat herder from Kenya, he told the electorate in 2008, so he would
bring people together. Folks perceived Obama as a nice man with an
inspiring family story.

In reality, Gilbert contends, Obama’s real father was Frank Marshall
Davis, a Communist Party USA propagandist who likely shaped Obama’s
worldview during his formative years.

Gilbert explained that while voters will overlook some fudging by
politicians, promoting a false family background to hide an agenda
irreconcilable with American values is a totally unacceptable
manipulation of the electorate.

“Barack Obama must now come clean,” Gilbert insisted. “Instead of
misrepresenting himself as he did in 2008, Obama should say, ‘My father
was a Communist Party propagandist and suspected Soviet agent who
indoctrinated me into Marxist ideology. Please vote for me so I can
destroy the American middle class and create a one-party political
system.’”

Gilbert emphasized the extensive research backing the claims made in
his film: “I have been to Hawaii twice researching Obama’s inspiring
family story of a Kenyan goat herder father. That is twice as many times
as all of the mainstream media combined! Who could have imagined that
news organizations with hundreds of reporters, and multi-million dollar
budgets, wouldn’t investigate a presidential candidate’s background in
2008 and would ignore doing so again in 2012?”

His research extended to examine Chicago and the roots of the Frank Marshall Davis ideology.

“Davis joined the Communist party in Chicago, only 15 years after the
Bolshevik Revolution,” Gilbert said.

“You can hear the classic Marxism
in Obama’s campaign, the ‘top 1 percent oppressing the 99 percent,’ and
‘you didn’t build your business, it was done on the backs of the
proletariat,’ and so on. Marxism is a failed ideology that has no basis
in fact in the American reality where the middle class has prospered and
the issue of poverty is taken seriously.”

Gilbert said getting the American public to understand the official
Obama nativity story is a fabrication will not be an easy task.

“Obama’s election was not a sudden political phenomenon,” he
explained. “It was the culmination of an American socialist movement
that Frank Marshall Davis nurtured in Chicago and Hawaii, and has been
quietly infiltrating the U.S. economy, universities and media for
decades.”

Tea party organizers in Fairfield told WND they are hoping to reschedule
the screening of “Dreams from My Real Father,” including bringing
Gilbert to town, later this month.

Benghazi: Obama knew within 24 hours that it was jihad

From Jihad Watch / Posted by Robert Spencer

It is ever clearer that the
Obama Administration knew it was a jihad attack and lied in a vain
attempt to cover up the abject failure of their support for the Islamic
supremacist "Arab Spring." As previously reported at Jihad Watch: "Benghazi attack: CIA reported 'within 24 hours' Islamist militants to blame," by Peter Foster in the Telegraph, October 19 (thanks to Twostellas):

Barack Obama was under renewed pressure over his handling of
the fatal attacks on the US consulate in Benghazi last night, after CIA
sources said they had reported "within 24 hours" that the assault was
carried out by Islamist militants.

The claims raised fresh questions about when exactly Mr Obama learned
that the storming of the consulate was a terrorist event, as senior
Republicans continued to accuse him of misleading the public over the
attacks in order to protect his record on neutralising al-Qaeda.

As the US general election enters its final weeks, the Benghazi
incident has become an increasingly charged political issue ahead of
Monday's last presidential debate, which will focus exclusively on
foreign policy.

Mr Obama defended his record on Benghazi during an appearance on the
acerbic current affairs comedy program, The Daily Show, pledging to
get to the bottom of what happened and hold those responsible.

However his pledge to track down those responsible for killing
Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans was contrasted by a
report from Benghazi that one of the alleged ring leaders in the attacks
was openly mocking both the Libyan and US governments.

Ahmed Abu Khattala, who has been linked to the militia group
Ansar al-Shariah gave a two-hour interview to the New York Times at a
luxury hotel, in which sipped a strawberry frappé while boasting no one
had questioned him over the attacks and that he had no plans to go into
hiding.

Mr Obama was also asked why Susan Rice, the US Ambassador to the
United Nations, was still linking the attacks to an offensive video a
week after the attacks, when other officials have subsequently testified
that it was already then clear to intelligence agencies that attack was
terrorist in nature.

"The truth is that information comes in, folks put it out throughout
the process, people say it is still incomplete," Mr Obama told the
show's host Jon Stewart.

"What I was always clear about was we are going to do an investigation and figure out what happened."

He later added: "Every piece of information that we got as we got it
we laid it out for the American people, and the picture eventually gets
fully filled in and we know how to prevent it in the future."....

You'll never prevent it as long as you keep lying about its root cause.

With the unprecedented budget explosion of means-tested,
welfare-related entitlements, does Team Obama think it can buy the
election?

It's a cynical question. But I wouldn't put it past that cynical bunch.

Remember Harry Hopkins, Franklin Roosevelt's close aid? It was
Hopkins who argued tax and tax, spend and spend, elect and elect. Sound
familiar? And if I'm not mistaken, the high-tax, anti-rich,
big-spending, redistributionist FDR is one of Barack Obama's idols.

So let's take a look at some of the recent budget-explosion data points:

According to Jeff Sessions, the ranking Republican on the Senate
Budget Committee, means-tested welfare programs soared to over $1
trillion last year. The federal government accounted for $750 billion of
that, while $250 billion came from the states, which leveraged federal
payments into even larger expenses.

Between 2008 and 2011, federal welfare payments have jumped 32
percent. Food stamps have surged, with 71 percent more spending on the
program in 2011 compared with 2008. Health payments, principally
Medicaid, have climbed 37 percent.

By the way, it's not just the deep recession and weak recovery that's driving up these programs. It's a substantial eligibility expansion, which started under George W. Bush, but has gone much further under President Obama.

In a larger budget context, reporter Jeffrey H. Anderson uses a
Treasury Department study to chronicle the 7-Eleven presidency. In
fiscal year 2012, ending Sept. 30, the government spent nearly $11 for
every $7 of revenues taken in. The exact figures are $2.5 trillion in
tax revenues and $3.5 trillion in spending. In other words, it spent 44
percent more than it had coming in.

Previous fiscal years look even worse: The government spent 56
percent more than revenues in fiscal year 2011 and 60 percent more in
fiscal year 2010.

All in all, according to Anderson, the government under the Obama
administration received $6.8 trillion in taxes and spent $10.7 trillion
-- 56 percent more than it had available.

What's going on here is fiscal profligacy on the grandest scale in American history. And there are consequences.

Massive amounts of capital are being drained from the private sector
and transferred to the government. This is one reason why American
businesses have gone on a virtual capital-investment strike. Small
businesses, in particular, can't get the capital being drained by Uncle
Sam.

After four years of trillion-dollar deficits, both businesses and
individuals have held back investment because they fear massive tax
increases are on the way. That's a big reason why the so-called recovery
has been so weak.

In addition, in our new entitlement nation, growing government
dependency is ruining the very moral fiber and backbone of America's
traditional work ethic. Increasingly, the feds are paying more to not work, rather than providing after-tax incentives to go back to work.

Mitt Romney has taken a lot of flak for raising the issue of growing
government dependency. But however inartfully he may have expressed his
view, his basic story is correct. The sheer volume of spending going on
in this country is bringing us ever closer to bankruptcy.

And consider this: The spending explosion for means-tested welfare
programs is outpacing spending on Social Security and Medicare, which
are themselves veering toward bankruptcy.

I may be too cynical about Obama trying to buy the election with this
entitlement explosion. Perhaps. But Obama wants to raise taxes in order
to spend more on government unions and entitlement programs.

President Obama's Closing Act: An Epic Collapse

The ongoing collapse of President Obama's campaign may lead to some
extraordinary stunts during Monday's last debate, but no matter what he
tries, it is very unlikely that the president can reverse the enormous
momentum behind Mitt Romney's campaign.

(One data point. Congressman John Campbell, a frequent guest on my radio
show, polled his district this week. It is Califronia's 45. John
McCain carried it by 4.7 points in 2008. Mitt Romney is almost 20
points ahead in this cycle. Campbell reports that this sort of result
is showing up across the country.)

The nation is simply finished with a president whose rhetoric has never
been matched by his actions, and whose performance has removed Jimmy
Carter from the bottom of the rankings of the modern president.

The president of course has his passionate supporters. These are the
same people that spent last Tuesdaynight declaring him the winner of his
second meeting with Mitt Romney, and Wednesday and Thursday trying to
infuse the word "binder" with game-changing significance.

They are the same people who spent Friday denying that "not optimal" was not a big deal.

"Binder" --big deal. "Not optimal" --no deal at all. That's the state of
the Obama campaign: A nearly Orwellian effort at making some words
matter and others disappear while facts are pushed aside It hasn't
worked. It won't work..

Mitt Romney by contrast followed two very strong debate showings with a
wonderful set of remarks at the Al Smith dinner, the third time in two
weeks that he has reassured those just tuning into the presidential
campaign that he will be a steady and reliable force for good in the
Oval Office.

Romney was ready for his close up. This is the primary reasion behind his surge.

And what a surge. Romney was up seven points in Thursday's Gallup
tracking poll, and even the very partisan Democratic polling firm PPP
has Romney ahead in Iowa and New Hampshire on Friday. The president is
hdidng from reporters to avoid more Libya questions, and when he
hand-picks a safe zone --a comedy show hosted by a huge ally-- he still
falls on his face, and not just with the "not optimal" comment but with
his doubling down on clsoing Gitmo.

The market shudders, the quesiness about earnings, the goofy jobs data
--all this and more is fueling the growing, now urgent sense of a need
for a big change. A U-Turn. And Mitt Romney is the beneficiary.

Every motorist who gases up between now and election day (especially
those in California) should recall last Monday's debate and the direct
question to the president about gas prices which he refused to asnwer.
Every Amerian who knows a recent or soon-to-be college graduate should
keep in mind Jeremy's question which the president refused to answer.

The answer they should remember is the president's to the comedian about Benghazi and how the massacre there wasn't "optimal."

There is a 1980 landslide forming, and while the MSM is doing its best
to pretend it isn't there and that the race is still close.

The Skills to Succeed Give every family access to a great school and quality teachers Provide access to affordable and effective higher education options Focus job training programs on building valuable skills that align with opportunities Attract and retain the best and brightest from around the world Trade That Works for America Curtail the unfair trade practices (monetary manipulation) of countries like China Open new markets for American goods and services Build stronger economic ties in Latin America Create a Reagan Economic Zone to strengthen free enterprise around the world

When
talking with The Daily Show' host Jon Stewart who asked Obama to admit
that government coordination was not "optimal" in regards to Benghazi,
Obama's reply was, quote, "Here is what I will say, if four Americans
get killed it is not optimal. We're going to fix it. All of it."

EMAIL FOLLOWERS

Follow My Posts by Email

The Patriot Factor

I am an American Patriot...part of the grassroots movement of bloggers spreading the truth the media will not. I am also co-host with Craig Andresen of RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS on RSP Radio at: https://streamingv2.shoutcast.com/right-side-patriots