Friday, 29 January 2016

Carman

We are often accused of spreading misinformation by our detractors,
sometimes by those who have taken part, wittingly or unwittingly, in
doing exactly that.

For the sake of accuracy and in order to contradict a
seemingly embedded myth, we would like to demonstrate that John
Geraghty, business tycoon who acquired the church keys for the McCanns
on May 7th or 8th 2007, is neither from Leicester nor is the man who appears between 00:47 and 01:00 of the above video “John Geraghty May 7, 2007 in Praia da Luz” alleged to be him:

“About the keys to the church, they were handed to them [the McCanns] on the 7 or 8 of May, which happened by suggestion of a person resident in the Parish, JONH GERAGHTY [sic], so that they could use the church, with serenity, without the media pressure. The key was handed by someone from the church JONH GERATHY [sic], who made them reach the McCanns, with the authorisation and consent [Portuguese: anuência] from the deponent”.

Mr Geraghty has
been identified in both the press and on blogs as a Leicester business
man, involved in the construction industry. Until we were given the
heads up by an anonymous source, quoting a name that enabled us to
research further, we also took this myth for granted.

As Mr Geraghty
has not made a statement to the PJ nor given interviews to the media, we
will follow our usual protocol of not publishing any personal
information not already known publicly, or speculating on his role as a
friend to the McCanns.

What we can say is that it appears from our
research Mr Geraghty has never lived or had any business connections in
the Leicester area. He married his wife R and has lived in the south of
England since the 1970s, until around 2002.

There are two facts stated by
the press which were correct: Mr and Mrs Geraghty now live near the
Boavista golf course and Mr Geraghty was 68 in 2007.

As the Boavista development was only
completed in 2002, their move to Portugal may coincide with their
absence from the electoral roll in the UK after this time.

Whether
the press description of Mr Geraghty as a “tycoon” – a rich and powerful
man – is an accurate statement, those who know him can say better than
we can.

And there are a number of people reading here who know him very
well, particularly as he was the Captain of the golf club in 2008 and
the first captain to achieve a hole-in-one.

Speaking of myths, the airport bag story seems to fit into
this category. Dominic Herbert wrote the story about a bag found near
Faro airport on 3/11/07, “Maddie DNA clue in airport bag” described in the PJ files as a “media invention”. This article was already mentioned by us in our post “Fabricated: Bag found in Portugal”.

It was the
same Dominic Herbert, writing for the now defunct News of the World on
30/9/07 (as usual, with an unnamed source, but known to him) about John
Geraghty storing the car for the McCanns in his garage, where
independent forensic tests were, allegedly, carried out.

“Undercover Brits’ secret tests on car” is a
dramatic account of white-suited men working for 9 hours overnight to
dismantle the car, unknown to the PJ: “The scientists, wearing protective white suits and using the latest techniques and equipment, dismantled the car in the double garage of a Pounds 1 million villa owned by a friend of the McCanns-wealthy British tycoon John Geraghty, 68”.

And a claim that a tracker device had been fitted to the car and removed by the PJ: “It is understood Portuguese cops then seized the car to remove a tracker device, the size of a credit card, attached to the carburettor. But it is believed the detectives are still NOT yet aware that the independent tests have been carried out”.

Was it true? Or was
it another “media invention”? According to Kate’s book, it’s true, as
she describes an unnamed friend storing their car and on the advice of
their lawyers, Kingsley Napley, having independent forensic tests
carried out on the car.

Nothing about the forensic scientists who
undertook the tests or the person who paid for them.

Kate does describe
a scientist from Control Risks Group undertaking tests on the twins’
hair, so can it be presumed that it was CRG who carried out the tests on
the car?

As Brian Kennedy became involved on September 12th,
according to Kate, it’s possible either he or Mr Geraghty paid for the
tests

Whatever happened, this is the last that is heard of the tests, whatever the results might have been.

Kate
says Michael Wright returned the car to Praia da Luz after they flew
home on September 9th, so presumably, he delivered the car to Mr
Geraghty. However, a report in News of the World stated that Geraghty
was at the airport when the McCanns left and that Kate had asked him to
store the car.

Maybe Wright drove the car back to PdL with Geraghty as a
passenger.

Sandy Cameron (former husband of Gerry’s sister Tricia) also
left PdL on the same day, according to Kate.

So he must have returned to
PdL at a later date, because the car was returned to Lagos by Sandy
Cameron on September 23rd.

Sandy Cameron, in his rogatory statement, describes using the car and
cleaning it because of the unpleasant smells in the boot, although
there is no documentation in the files about his nomination as a driver:

“While we were in the villa, a gardener would arrive every week or every 15 days, as would have been determined by the estate agency. The gardener would leave the rubbish bags near the back door and on at least one occasion, I used the vehicle to throw out this garbage. The garbage collection Portugal is not done the same way as in the U.K., and because of this it was necessary to take all the garbage to an area which I would call “recycling area” at the back of the Ocean Club. I used the Renault Scenic with this objective in various occasions.

On one occasion, I think in July of 2007, I took Patricia to the supermarket. We placed the shopping in the boot of the Renault Scenic; we bought various items including fresh fish, shrimp and steak. When we unloaded the shopping, I noticed that blood had run out from the package to the bottom of the plastic bag.

After this shopping trip and still in the month of July 2007, I began to notice a strange odour in the car. I did not give it much importance and assumed it probably was caused by the garbage bags or by the blood leaked in the boot on the shopping day. As a result, I removed the mat from the boot to clean it up. I shook the mat to remove any particles, cleaned it with a wet cloth and let it catch air.

In my opinion it’s impossible that Kate and Gerry would have hidden Madeleine somewhere and used the car to transport her to another location. There was always lots of people and mediea observing each of their movements, for this to be possible.”

The return form was also signed by John Geraghty (is that a
pp?, meaning somebody signed on his behalf)

As an aside, why did
Sandy Cameron need to return to PdL to return the car, after the McCann
family had departed, leaving Michael Wright behind to do the cleaning
and packing? He was a teacher and the autumn term would have started.

Was
John Geraghty simply a Good Samaritan from the Catholic congregation of
Nossa Senhora da Luz who became a friend of the McCanns?

He certainly
kept a very low profile. However, one photographer did capture a moment
from September 9th 2007, on the day the McCanns and some of their family
returned to the UK. Gerry is seen with two unnamed men.

Compare this to a
photograph taken in the south of England in 1991 and the golf captain
photo of him taken in PdL. Mr Geraghty bears no resemblance to the man
in the video clip, who is balding, white-haired and not wearing glasses.

The real Mr Geraghty did work with an organisation in the UK which
had links with churches. It seems a very reputable organisation which
continues to undertake good work with overseas communities.

He may have
come to the aid of the McCanns as part of the Catholic community, even
though they did not set foot in the church before the disappearance of
Madeleine.

Who knows if he remains friends or whether he ever regrets
becoming involved.

He should know whether it’s true that Euclides
Monteiro’s tractor accident happened on the golf course near Lagos, back
in 2009, as claimed by journalist Brendan de Beer as referred by us in our post “Person of interest”.

Or is Euclides
Monteiro’s tractor accident on a golf course just
another myth?

For all these years someone has been taken as Mr Geraghty when he clearly he's not and for all these years everyone from Praia da Luz who reads up on the case and knows the real Mr Geraghty has been happy to see this mistaken identity and say nothing, except for our anonymous reader.

It’s almost a case of one having to ask “who's afraid of John Geraghty”?

68 comments:

The PJ referred to the airport bag story as "a media invention".Unless Herbert invented the story himself, which seems unlikely, he must have questions to ask of his source, who lied to him. If about one invention, how many other stories did his source invent?

Hi Textusa,really good post especially concerning these persons in the article,estranged to the Family of the McCann's?With regard to Mr John Geraherty,church and car keys and his identity, we will have to as "Slim shady" as to whether or not who is the real Mr John Geraherty,but it brings on new evidence of the Golf Club,didn't Two arquido's ever meet up at a certain Golf Club,phone calls text messages?caught on Video,"Gerry, do you know Robert Murat,Cough,I'm not going to comment on that!","Ask the Dog's Sandra"?

Anonymous 14h40: Robert Murat went to Palmares Golf in Lagos, not to Boavista GC.

Not Textusa: Glad you're alive, I quite missed your little rants.

I quote you: " So nobody corrected some blogger and you think this is news?" ermmmm may I refer you to your own blog?

Fact is Mr Geraghty is not from Leicester and it is important to say so. I am grateful Textusa published this post. It is quite irritating to see the mad connections people establish and identify the wrong man and splash some unrelated person's life online. A is called Geraghty -There is a Geraghty in Leicester -It is same man-He is rich-My oh my he plays golf in an average Club-good heavens -there is a foreign man with a British accent in the video - There are no other British in PDL - Hence it is JG - LEicester is such a tiny village all know eachother-They must be friends from before...Nope! Thank you Textusa. Well done.

Textusa: Yes quite interesting re Euclides Monteiro I tend to agree with you. I believe Bragança is more likely, as reported by Sol. Isabel

What business is it of yours to insist this man lived in Leicester, thereby helping to promote the myth that dodgy contracts connected him to the McCanns? At least we have undermined this slur on his character.

In fact you are limiting ourselves to be factual with a person who is of interest to the case.

Him allowing the Scenic to park in his property makes him a person of interest to the case, as well as him being the person referred by Father Pacheco in having suggested church keys be given to the McCanns.

I can't see the importance at all. I certainly can't see a reason to be posting photographs from nearly 20 years ago or poking your noses into his business, which you would have to do in order to say where he was from

I haven't insisted he was from Leicester. I don't think it's any business of yours where he is from and I certainly don't think it's any business of yours to be publishing photographs of him without his permission

Thank you for your acknowledgement for the need: "which you would have to do in order to say where he was from"

Would you prefer that people continue to think erroneously that Mr Geraghty's was from the Leicester area and so have wrongly deduced that the possible friendship between him and the McCanns be from there?

We know, being such a factual individual, you see the importance of such a correction.

I always thought JG was a strange player in the Madeleine story. Was awfully good of him to store the Scenic after the event. Since the Scenic was out of action for three weeks during the MC's holiday could it also have been 'stored' somewhere convenient then?

I see 'not Textusa' is getting his/her knickers/underpants in a twist again! Just pipe down will you? No one here is remotely interested in what you have to say and if we ever did feel the need we would take a quick visit to YOUR blog so run along now . There's a good boy/girl.

Not Textusa has been flat out defending another ex pat Mrs Fenn on another blog also. There he is attempting to alienate posters and link them to others who are not held in very high esteeme on that blog in an attempt silence their views. I see him at it here also we who hold certain views about what went on in PDL and the involvement of the OC and the ex pat community are all loons. The problem with this Not Textusa is that when you only join the conversation to defend one or two groups of people your motives for commenting on this case are so transparent.

Why shouldn't Mrs Fenn be defended? She did nothing wrong. Neither did the ex-pat community, locals and other holidaymakers, all of whom you have attacked and libelled for years. If you don't like being pulled up on it, don't do it.

We KNOW some of the holidaymakers lied because it's in the PJ files. Neil Berry, for example, was positively identified as being seen lurking in the stairwell of block 5 early in the evening on the day Maddie disappeared. This is the question the PJ asked Neil Berry:

"Considering the fact that you were seen by a witness, clarify what you were doing at that time next to the stairs leading to the upper floor, which are located next to the lift of Block 5 at the Ocean Club, i.e. not far from the apartment from where Madeleine McCann went missing?"

The PJ didn't ask Neil Berry if he was in the stairwell, they TOLD HIM he was in the stairwell of block 5. And what he was doing there when the laundryman Mario Marreiros saw him looking like he'd got caught with his fingers in the sweetie jar had nothing to do with the disappearance of Maddie, he was there for other reasons, and whatever those reasons were he wasn't happy he'd been seen. Because he lied to the police and denied ever being there.

And so what was important then was trying to discredit the laundryman Mario Marreiros and Stephen Carpenter was given that job. Stephen Carpenter told the police he'd seen a white van near his apartment in PdL. He said he'd never looked in the van, he'd never seen anyone near the van, he'd never seen anyone in the van, he'd never seen anyone drive the van. In fact he told the police absolutely NO-ONE had been near this white van at all and YET Stephen Carpenter told the police the van belonged to the laundryman and was used to carry the bed linen. Not only that, this laundryman he'd never seen also had a garage in PdL in which there was a bed and children's toys. That's what Stephen Carpenter told the police in his statement.

A clear attempt to implicate Mario Marreiros in the abduction of Maddie because Mario Marreiros identified the man he saw lurking in the stairwell of block 5 as Neil Berry.

"With regard to where I was at 18.00, whom I was with and the fact that I was seen by a witness at this time next to stairs and lift of block 5 of the Ocean Club:I am not certain where I was at 18.00. It is possible that I was already in my apartment or returning from the bar. In order to arrive at my apartment I would walk along the side of the pool, crossing the stairs of block 4. If I were with someone, this person would be Raj, but as I have already said I do not remember whether I returned with him or before him. I do not remember having seen a lift in any of the apartment blocks. I was not in block 5, but had to pass by it in order to arrive at my apartment. It is possible that I was on the other side of the street opposite block five.

With relation to one of the Ocean Club employees having passed close by:I do not remember having seen Ocean Club staff collecting dirty laundry at this hour.''

Nowhere does he say he wasn't there. He says he can't remember where he was, nor does he remember seeing anyone collecting laundry.

Mario Marreiros did not identify Neil Berry

I really do not know where you are getting the stuff about Stephen Carpenter from because it's perfectly clear from his statement; (censored).

Mario Marreiros DID identify Neil Berry as being the man lurking in the stairwell of block 5 early evening on the day Maddie disappeared. This is what the PJ said to Neil Berry:

"Considering the fact that you were seen by a witness, clarify what you were doing at that time next to the stairs leading to the upper floor, which are located next to the lift of Block 5 at the Ocean Club, i.e. not far from the apartment from where Madeleine McCann went missing?"

The PJ didn't ask Neil Berry if he was in the stairwell, they TOLD HIM he was in the stairwell of block 5. He was positively identified by Mario Marreiros as being the man lurking in the stairwell of block 5. But he denied it, so he lied to the police. Neil Berry said:

"I was not in block 5"

It's in this paragraph here:

"I am not certain where I was at 18.00. It is possible that I was already in my apartment or returning from the bar. In order to arrive at my apartment I would walk along the side of the pool, crossing the stairs of block 4. If I were with someone, this person would be Raj, but as I have already said I do not remember whether I returned with him or before him. I do not remember having seen a lift in any of the apartment blocks. I was not in block 5, but had to pass by it in order to arrive at my apartment. It is possible that I was on the other side of the street opposite block five."

As regards Stephen Carpenter, if he saw a van but never looked in the van, never saw anyone near the van, never saw anyone in the van, never saw anyone drive the van, then he didn't know who used it. He saw NO-ONE, that's what he said and YET Stephen Carpenter told the police the van belonged to the laundryman and was used to carry the bed linen. So he lied as well.

As for the garage he claims he went into which had a bed and children's toys, it doesn't exist.

Neil Berry lied, he denied being in the stairwell of block 5 early evening on the day Maddie disappeared even though he WAS there. The laundryman Mario Marreiros saw him and identified him to the PJ.

As for Stephen Carpenter, this is from his statement:

DCF: Its in the part where it mentions that there was a van, and says that it was parked at the back of Robert Murat'' garden, and that you never saw anyone use the van, but you remember that it had something to do with the cleaning staff.

SC: Yes, to transport the bedlinen and towels.

DCF: Yes. It says here that you never saw anyone drive it, you just know that you saw it parked, did you ever notice that it was missing or do you remember always seeing it there'

SC:Humm, no...no it was not always there, I saw it about two or three times.

So Stephen Carpenter said he saw the van "about two or three times" and it's clear that in his previous statement (the one he was clarifying, which DC Ferguson is reading out to him) that he NEVER saw anyone use the van "you never saw anyone use the van" and he NEVER saw anyone drive the van "It says here that you never saw anyone drive it". Stephen Carpenter also said this:

"the van was parked there, I never saw anyone and more than once assumed that it would be cleaning staff and only this thought coincided with the presence of the man from the laundry, and if there were any reply to be made in relation to the link between the van parked there and the laundry man."

He NEVER saw anyone "I never saw anyone" but despite never seeing anyone use the van, or drive the van, and despite saying that in fact he NEVER saw ANYONE at all anywhere near the van he "assumed" the van was used by the laundry man. Utter tosh, and a clear attempt at implicating Mario Marreiros in the abduction of Maddie. And why would be want to do that? Because Mario Marreiros positively identified Neil Berry as the man lurking in the stairwell of block 5 looking like he got caught with his hand in the sweetie jar, and so Mario Marreiros HAD to be discredited. But unfortunately for Stephen Carpenter he was so bad at doing the task he was required to do that his LIES jump out from the page.

As regards the garage, it doesn't exist. There are no garages in the area where Stephen Carpenter said they searched, and in fact what the poor unfortunate Mr Carpenter didn't know when he made up this fictional garage is that there are barely ANY garages at all in PdL.

In the article Mario Marreiros says he "identified a potential suspect to Portuguese police a few months after Madeleine went missing. He spent hours with an officer looking at pictures and videos." Mario Marreiros identified the man from pictures and videos, and here is the man:

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/NeilBerry1.jpg

That's the man who Mario Marreiros said “had a really fat face and had two-tone sunglasses on, they got lighter at the bottom and were big" and had "lots of hair, close to his head — like it was glued. It was straight hair. He was about my age now — 45, 46.”

That man is Neil Berry, and should there be any doubt about it, note the article says this "according to Portuguese files, officers asked British police to put more questions to this man – a full year after Madeleine vanished."

And indeed they did, and the man they put those questions to was NEIL BERRY:

"Considering the fact that you were seen by a witness, clarify what you were doing at that time next to the stairs leading to the upper floor , which are located next to the lift of Block 5 at the Ocean Club, i.e. not far from the apartment from where Madeleine McCann went missing ?

On that occasion, did you actually pass by an Ocean Club employee that went there to pick up laundry ?"

Neil Berry was POSITIVELY IDENTIFIED by Mario Marreiros (from photos and videos) as the man lurking in the stairwell of block 5 and when Neil Berry was asked by the PJ what he was doing there, he denied being there at all. He LIED.

As for the rest, If it's nonsense then it would be easy to show that it was nonsense wouldn't it. And yet . . . . nothing.

I'm curious to know who do you think was the witness mentioned by the PJ in this sentence from the files when questioning N Berry "Considering the fact that you were seen by a witness, clarify what you were doing at that time next to the stairs leading to the upper floor". If not Mario Marreiros, who?

"A situation was investigated relating to two individuals, Neil B. and Rajinder B., especially as regards the former, whose information was crossed with Tasmin Silence’s witness account, the photofit showing that this was not the same individual. In spite of the inquiries made, including by means of the Letter of Request, nothing was found to link him to the disappearance of the British girl.''

So the PJ ruled him out. But of course, you know better than them....http://themaddiecasefiles.com/post245356.html#p245356

Who cares where his statement is? We know it EXISTS just like we know Stephen Carpenter's first statement EXISTS even though it's not in the files.

As for this:

"A situation was investigated relating to two individuals, Neil B. and Rajinder B., especially as regards the former, whose information was crossed with Tasmin Silence’s witness account, the photofit showing that this was not the same individual. In spite of the inquiries made, including by means of the Letter of Request, nothing was found to link him to the disappearance of the British girl.''

We know all that, Neil Berry was investigated because he was positively identified by Mario Marreiros as the man lurking in the stairwell of block 5, so that's nothing new.

As for the PJ ruling him out, of course he was ruled out, Neil Berry wasn't involved in the disappearance of Maddie McCann. No, Neil Berry was lurking in the stairwell of block 5 looking like he got caught with his fingers in the sweetie jar because he was involved in the SWINGING.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-482662/McCanns-hire-Omagh-bomb-expert-carry-independent-DNA-tests.htmlThis seems relevant to current post.So it wasn't CRG scientist but this scientist?Either the tests didn't take place or they weren't favourable?

Tests were being used as a 'defence' - not out of shock, or alarm, or curiosity. And only, it seems, with the hired car. The mcCanns must have felt relaxed enough about UK sniffer dogs alerting to death and blood in apartment 5a; in the flowerbed' to 'cuddle cat' and to cadaver scent on Kate's clothes?

The article is regarding the accuracy of LCDNA Testing methods by the FSS . Not the accuracy of the dogs. There were several problems with the FSS and with LC-DNA methods . In fact LCDNA evidence was suspended for a while after this case until correct methods were put in place. Namely by the FSS which, according to police reports, was using an incorrect method to perform them.

In 2007 A joint statement issued by the Home Office and Acpo said: "Towards the end of 2006 we become aware that a small percentage of DNA samples may need to be re- examined as a result of differences in the way forensic suppliers were using new techniques to analyse forensic material between 2000 and 2005. This is now referring to the use by the FSS of the non recommended LCDNA technique “The review relates to cases where the FSS analysed tiny samples of blood or saliva for a DNA profile, only to get a negative result when detectives had expected otherwise.“ DNA evidence became traceable in very small traces of bodily fluids from 2000 following advances in testing techniques."

I see you've been very busy responding to Insane on your blog.How wonderful it is to see him so silenced by both yourself and Nuala. Both so very incisive.Glad to see that in future you're going to be censoring his referrals to 'conspiracy' What a strange character Geraghty is, mysterious and elusive, nothing seemed to add up, so glad you have managed to reveal the discrepancies Why has no one ever felt the need to correct the case of a mistaken identity?

Anon 18.07,it's only "Mistaken Identity" when you need to mask the real one, who stated he was Mr John Geraherty to the press,public persona?Now people have been able to identify the resemblance of a person,"Staring at Gerry McCann", who was hot stepping it back to the UK with Kate and family 8/9 September 2007,Renault Scenic and close associations to a Portugal Golf course Captain, we are able to digest,why they wished for his identity to be secret?

Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.

Total Pageviews

As of Jan 19 2019 we're waiting for Jules to own the blog.

MESSAGE to NEWCOMERS

This blog believes that concerning the MADDIE McCANN case the following happened:

- Maddie McCanndied in the early evening of May 3rd, 2007, in the Apartment 5A. We believe the death to have been accidental.

- At the time of Maddie's death the Praia da Luz's Ocean Club was hosting a large swinging holiday (which we believe took place in various locations in and around Praia da Luz - from Lagos to Sagres) in which the McCanns and friends were part of among many others.

- After Maddie's death a cover-up of unseen proportions and scope took place not to hide Maddie's death but with the main purpose of hiding the presence of swinging. To achieve that, Maddie's death had to be hidden.

- We don't believe there was any sort of negligence involved in the Maddie affair. We don't believe that T9 dined at Tapas Bar from Sunday to Wednesday. We think that on those nights they left their children with professional nannies - as did other guests - to go dine downtown PdL. On Thursday night they did use Tapas but that was simply part of what was to be "negligence"that was required to allow Maddie to be "abducted."

PJ Files

Anonymity

A MAJOR MINORITY

TRUTH is Self-Sustained

Think for yourself

Luz - THE VILLAGE OF THE DAMNED

PdL - What a place. Why does anyone holiday there?It's populated by black heroin addicts, people who rob apartments, gypsies who steal scrap and wood, scruffy moustachioed lurers of children, bogus charity collectors, suspicious street musicians, men lurking near phone booths, glasses man lurking in stairwells, blond men suspiciously lurking outside apartments, soothing couples entering apartments without permission, mysterious gangs of cleaners, men taking photographs of children on beaches... And to top it all, you have to queue for a table booking.Anonymous 11Nov 2013 12:22:00

Maybe because you can always enjoy an ice-cream in the rain?And a dip in an icy pool on arrival always attracts a crowd.Textusa 11Nov 2013 12:28:00

I like the Tapas fragile chairs and tables. They wobble nicely when cutting thick grilled steaks spilling the drinks all about! It's fun for the whole family!Anonymous 11Nov 2013 13:08:00

And how about the number of men seen carrying little blond girls in the street in the middle of the night?Anonymous 11Nov 2013 14:04:00

PdL - where families take it in turn to vomit each night, dog packs pursue and bite joggers, guests fall off catamarans, damage tendons playing tennis, have shaving accidents and stagger around apartments bleeding, domestic appliances need repair, shutters jam, baby monitors won't function at restaurants, travel cots can't be assembled.. sounds like THE VILLAGE OF THE DAMNED.Anonymous 12 Nov 2013 12:37:00

Child Catcher

Algarve - THE REGION OF THE DAMNED

“Algarve – Where Chitty Chitty Bang Bang’s Child Catcher found it ideal to roam the streets with his GYPSY-wagon:“There are children here somewhere. I can smell them. Come along, kiddie-winkies!”Algarve, the REGION OF THE DAMNED.”

Please Reconstruct I:

PJ's Declaration for Reopening Process:

"Madeleine McCann

As is the case with any situation in which a child goes missing, notwithstanding formal dismissal of the inquiry into her disappearance, and just as has always been publicly stated, the Polícia Judiciária never stopped paying close attention to any and all information that might possibly shed light on the whereabouts of the minor Madeleine McCann, the circumstances surrounding her disappearance and the identity of the perpetrator(s).

It was with this goal in mind that in March 2011 the National Director of the Polícia Judiciária entrusted a team of investigators from the North Directorate with the mission of reassessing, as a whole, the vast amount of information gathered during the inquiry, aimed at identifying data for which a more in-depth investigation might be useful and possible.

The reassessment which took place over the last two years and a half suggested new evidence to have surfaced, which, requiring the investigation to proceed, meets the requirements set out by section 279(1) of the Portuguese Code of Criminal Procedure for reopening of the inquiry.

Accordingly, a request for reopening was made to the Public Prosecutor for the jurisdiction of Portimao, and approval granted by the latter. "

The Anne Guedes Transcriptions

Permanent Suggested Reading

Quote

“It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” Mark Twain

Revelations

"For the righteous, a revelation is a joyous event, the realization of a divine truth but for the wicked, revelations can be far more terrifying, when dark secrets are exposed and sinners are punished for their trespasses." Quote from the TV Series "Revenge" (T2 - Ep9)

Truth

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.Arthur Schopenhauer

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.Winston Churchill

The Revolution

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.George Orwell

The Revolution Goes Viral

"Once information networks become social, the implications are massive: truth can now travel faster than lies, and all propaganda becomes instantly flammable. Sure, you can try to insert spin, but the instantly networked consciousness of millions of people will set it right: they act like white blood cells against infection so that ultimately the truth, or something close to it, persists much longer than disinformation"The Guardian (04Jan12)

We must build dikes of courage to hold back the flood of fear. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts Winston Churchill

PRECIOUS, SO TRUE, WORDS

“One coincidence, two coincidences – maybe they’re still coincidences. Any more than that and it stops being coincidence.”

Kate McCann

(in MADELEINE, by Kate McCann, published in 2011 by Bantam Press, pg. 328)

Imagine...

"This says it all, Ms Loach hit the nail on the head!

"Ms Loach replied: “Imagine the public believing that you covered up your child’s death and then sought to make money out of it. They feel shame, humiliation and anguish."

Yes, that's exactly what we, the public, believe, because that's exactly what they did! And, their "shame, humiliation and anguish" are because they know we know!"

Comment posted by Anonymous to Textusa at Sep 16, 2013, 8:36:00 AM on "McCann vs Amaral Libel Trial" post referring to Mockumentary maker Emma Loach's testimony on the 1st day of said trial as one of McCann's defense witness.

Legal Disclaimer

This blog expresses exclusively the exchange of ideas and of opinions, between WHITE HATS, so is not responsible for the use, misuse or any form of interpretation (mainly misinterpretation) of its content, as although it uses a public medium, as is the internet, it's of PRIVATE nature, very much like any other conversation that takes place in a restaurant, pub or any other public location, where FREEDOM OF SPEECH is exercised.

Sound Explanation for Viciousness

Compliments from the Maggots' Lair:

- “…all the others pale into insignificance when compared to textusa.”

- “I think she should be on the streets and off the internet"

Chinagirl):

- “Disgusting piece of slime.”

(Raptor):

- “Yikes ! That's disgusting.”

(preciousramotswe):

- “You are right. It's a shambolic mess of vitriol and obtuseness. But then they always are. The one that some claimed finally 'proved' who was carrying who during the Smith sighting is a masterpiece of deliberately confused arguments in which labrynthine plots are used to cover how empty the central thesis is”

Out of the Blue (or... Black?)

Hey textusa How are you? well I hope,just thought I would tell you that there are videos about you on youtube, claiming you are an internet predator who stole her daughters identity and prowls the forums for young boys, they say you are welsh!! I think its a case of mistaken identity because are you not portuguese and male? Anyway great blog. keep it up.(Anon., Nov 13th, 05:43)

Conversation from the "Lightless Zone"

sabot:

“Wot Round Table?”

bonnybraes1:

“He/she/it invented a barking mad 'theory' about no-one actually having eaten in the Tapas, because he/she/it couldn't grasp the table arrangements.”

So, because textusa doesn't understand stuff like that, all the Tapas group, the staff, everyone, were lying.

OMG - you don't suppose textusa is actually Gonc, do you?”

sansouci:“Could be Bonny.

The 'theories' about the table and the watersports are really so far beyond bizarre, that I get the feeling that 'textusa' could actually be 'pisstaka'.”

BLACK BUT TRUE WORDS

“Because no-one is more vicious in their search for payback that those who realise they have allowed themselves to be taken for a fool” (A "boomerang" comment left by an Anonymous (Insane?) at Sep 22, 2012 2:06:00 PM)

Insane's IMPORTANT Comments

“…How would any of you idiots like it if your name came into the public domain because you were witness to a crime, and some mad bitch set up a site in which she called you a liar, and claimed you were actually involved in the crime you witnessed? Just ponder on that for a moment”

Aug 28, 2011 9:27:00 AM

“…Where is your sense of shame or decency in accusing innocent witnesses of being involved in covering up the death of a child?

I see no shame or decency on here - just an utter indifference to the rights or feelings of others.

I notice no-one had the balls to answer my question about how you would feel if this was done to you - if you were a witness to a crime and some deranged cow on the internet accused you of being involved. You are all a complete disgrace.”

Aug 28, 2011 1:09:00 PM

FOOT IN THE MOUTH DISEASE

Insane (Nov 14, 2012 11:37:00 PM):

Oh look here - amazing what one can find out by means of a couple of emails to Mark Warner.

You are toast, lady. Finished.

I am going to enjoy this more than is actually decent.

Textusa (Nov 15, 2012 8:50:00 AM):

Well it seems that you're quite privy with the Ocean Club aren't you?

Them giving YOU the information about their own mails?

And you threatening us based on information that YOU apparently got from the Ocean Club.

That's really interesting, isn't it?

Insane (Nov 15, 2012 10:47:00 PM):

One thing I really like about Mark Warner is how helpful their staff are. Really go the extra mile for someone needing information. IYKWIM

:)

Textusa (Nov 16, 2012 11:17:00 AM):

Thank you for confirming that Mark Warner Staff are supplying YOU with information pertaining the Maddie Affair.

Insane's Moment of Rare Beauty

“It would be more suspicious if every account tallied. Police expect to find contradictions, don't tell me you did not know this?” (Nov 22, 2012 3:38:00 PM), when providing an opinion on contradictions from various statements in the PJ Files.

“I don't give a rat's arse about the statements which tally too closely - of course some of them tally too closely, there is an in depth analysis of them on my blog, the one you are not invited to.” (Nov 22, 2012 4:08:00 PM), when, exactly 30 minutes later, provides an opposite opinion, in this case about the fact that some of Tapas' Staff's statements tally too closely.

Insane the Entrepeneur?

"I'd love to stay, but I have a report to write, and it won't do itself, will it?" (Nov 29, 2012 8:14:00 PM)Insane the Disruptor, a new profession shown inNew Career Opportunities

Insane's Proposal for a New Legal Disclaimer

Textusa's new disclaimer. Please ignore all previous versions

''This blog expresses exclusively the exchange of ideas and opinions between people who have sniffed WAY too many solvents, and the imaginary people who live at the bottom of their garden, and so is not responsible for the enormous fines, possible imprisonment, or lifelong incarceration in a mental hospital which may result from it's content, as although it is on the interclickyweb, it is of a private nature, accompanied only by the voices in their heads, very much like any other conversation which takes place in a psychiatric ward between people rocking backwards and forwards in their seat and eating the wallcoverings, where FREEDOM OF SPEECH is exercised in the half hour per day of free association which the inmates are allowed.''Comment NOT published but submitted on Aug 22, 2011 10:17:00 PM

Kate's Round Table

INSANE'S BLOG

We waited so long for the link...

A possible explanation for the wait: "As I have made perfectly clear, you and your sort will never have access to my blog. We are particular about who we invite, and would not include screaming harpies and riff-faff like yourself."unpublished comment from Insane at Nov 23, 2012 10:55:00 AM

Then, a glimmer of hope?“Publishing elsewhere the posts Textusa refuses to publish is also appropriate - and also gives you fools a chance to read what she withholds from you, knowing that you would desert her if you were aware of how much trouble she leads you into.” (Nov 29, 2012 12:40:00 PM)

No, it wasn’t to be so… :“For the last time, you will never be provided with a link for my blog - you are not welcome there and will never be given access”(Nov 29, 2012 1:38:00 PM)