The location stuff doesn't personally bother me. More amusing, and am used to a certain crazy artistic licence in this city.

Click to expand...

It's not uncommon to favor a scenic location over geographic accuracy. In Continuum, a show that's actually set in Vancouver as well as filmed there, the famous Vancouver Public Library is used to represent the exterior of the city's police headquarters.

Click to expand...

In Robin Hood Prince Of Thieves, Robin lands at the White Cliffs of Dover with 'We'll be in Nottingham by nightfall'.

Unless she plead guilty -- which her attorney would advise her strongly not to do -- I don't see how she goes away for the crime.

She has a couple of different defense. The obvious one, "Defense of Others" as a self-defense argument. Plus, her story of the crime wouldn't hold up to examination -- she didn't have the means, only the motive and opportunity -- and even the fact that Delancey's wife was planning the very same murder would give rise to reasonable doubt.

I was expecting it to turn out that she really did kill the guy to protect his son.

I was quite pleased to hear them acknowledging school bullying as a form of child abuse. I'm glad we're outgrowing the tendency to think of bullying as a normal and acceptable part of growing up -- although I wish society had figured that out soon enough to do me some good.

I continue to be impressed with the evolution of Watson as a character on this show. When they first started last year I expected her to be acting in her sober companion role for quite a while. See I'm used to these types of shows to keep their characters in a static orbit for quite a long time.

So to see her grow as a character like this is really endearing me to the show quite a bit.

And was it just me, or is Watson writing about Holmes a nod to the books and how they were told from "his" perspective?

Tom HendricksThat boy is our last hope, NO! there is another.Premium Member

I agree about Watson's growth, really making her a well rounded character. However the biggest part of this is Lucy Liu's growth as an actor. She is so fantastic in this, she's able to keep up and hold her own with Johnny Lee Miller.

Really enjoyed last two episodes. Nice to see Watson grow as a character. But what really struck/impressed me in Poison Pen was Miller's acting, especially in the two-hander scenes with the 'poisoner'.

Tom HendricksThat boy is our last hope, NO! there is another.Premium Member

ETA: So just watched it, one of the best episodes yet. I so enjoy Johnny Lee Miller in this. His impassioned speech about needing his support system, his evolution because of Watson, the Captain and Detective Bell was very powerful.

Now to get to what you inferred, a very interesting turn with Mycroft. I hope it's not as sinister as implied but I guess we'll see. I have really enjoyed Rhys Ifan and hope these developments means we'll see him more.

Now to get to what you inferred, a very interesting turn with Mycroft. I hope it's not as sinister as implied but I guess we'll see. I have really enjoyed Rhys Ifan and hope these developments means we'll see him more.

Click to expand...

Here's what I wrote about that on Facebook and a Sherlock Holmes mailing list this morning:

A quick thought on last night's ELEMENTARY. Specifically, the final scene with Mycroft.

I really like Rhys Ifans. I think he has great rapport with Johnny Lee Miller. I have no problem buying them as brothers.

But he hasn't struck me as Mycroft. Until last night. And, specifically, the final scene, alone in The Diogenes.

For those not playing at home, ELEMENTARY'S Mycroft is a restaurateur and a leukemia survivor. He had come to New York City to bond with his brother, with whom he's had a terrible relationship, and open a new restaurant, The Diogenes. Neither of these struck me as "right"; I felt that ELEMENTARY was, in this case, trying too hard to differentiate itself from SHERLOCK, and what we ended up with was a character with the same name but none of the same attributes as the Canon Mycroft.

In the episode, Mycroft delivered a message to Sherlock from their father (who hasn't been named, but I'll call Siger because of William S. Baring-Gould) -- Siger expected Sherlock to return to London, and he was in danger of being cut off if he didn't.

Sherlock hems and haws throughout the episode, and interestingly we get an explanation for why ELEMENTARY's Sherlock has focused exclusively on murders; he turns down ordinary cases so he can work with the NYPD. (This addressed one of my long-standing problems with ELEMENTARY; the Canon Holmes took all sorts of cases because they engaged him, from missing persons to purloined papers, and murder was only one small part of that.) In the end, he gives Mycroft a letter for Siger that lays out why he intends to remain in New York, whatever the cost.

In the final scene with Mycroft (which may be the final scene of the episode, come to think of it), we see Mycroft alone, in The Diogenes. He takes the sealed letter out of his jacket. He looks at it. He tears it up. (Which had me yell at my television, "No, Mycroft! How could you?")

And then he calls someone.

They have a conversation. It seems that it's not Siger that wants Sherlock to come home after all. Rather, Mycroft is working with someone to either 1) get Sherlock out of New York or 2) get Sherlock back to London. And since this attempt to pry Sherlock out of New York failed, there will be others.

Now, the way I immediately read this scene was, "Oh, damn, Mycroft is working with the season's Big Bad. Or possibly Moriarty." Which would be interesting; I like Natalie Dormer's interpretation of Moriarty.

But then I said, "No. Just no. No Evil Mycroft! No Evil Mycroft!"

Then I realized that was the point. I think we're supposed to think the former -- Mycroft is working with nefarious persons to get Sherlock to London -- and I've no doubt that when he reappears (February sweeps, no doubt) we'll see something happen that makes us question Mycroft's loyalties. But there's no basis at all for Evil Mycroft in the Canon. Instead, I remembered that Mycroft has been playing a subtle game with Sherlock, to get Sherlock to do something he doesn't ordinarily want to do but would if coached in the right way. This time, the coaching didn't work.

And this sold me on Rhys Ifans' Mycroft.

This is who I think Mycroft is. He's working for MI-6, his chain of restaurants around the world give him reasons to travel, and he's trying to get a valuable asset back to the UK that he can use very unofficially. It's important to remember the dinner conversation, where Mycroft mentions that Sherlock would have gone back to working with Scotland Yard. This would put Sherlock in a position to work on cases that have bearing on Mycroft's (deep undercover) work. After all, who looks for a spymaster in a restaurant?

I know, I'm theorizing well in advance of the evidence and that invariably biases the result. I know that I'm out if we get Evil Mycroft, because that's a change too far from the Canon. I know that I want ELEMENTARY's Mycroft to be more like his Canon counterpart, and thus I'm twisting what little we know to make that fit.

1) We know from a text message we saw last season that Daddy Holmes's first initial is M.

2) Several episodes have featured Holmes taking on cases that weren't initially homicides, such as a kidnapping and an impossible heist, and he's also taken on cases for people other than the police, like when he was hired to track down the guy who leaked the government secrets. However, all those cases eventually ended up involving homicides in one way or another.

2) Several episodes have featured Holmes taking on cases that weren't initially homicides, such as a kidnapping and an impossible heist, and he's also taken on cases for people other than the police, like when he was hired to track down the guy who leaked the government secrets. However, all those cases eventually ended up involving homicides in one way or another.

Click to expand...

All true. It seems at times that the non-homicide crime gets short shrift in Elementary. I want to see Holmes track down lost kittens! I want to see Holmes bust up a secret society of mimes!

Okay, I meant that last one as a joke, but now that I think about it, that sounds awesome.

The former, by the way, is something Holmes did in a radio play Dorothy Sayers wrote starring her Lord Peter Wimsey. As a child, Lord Peter lost his kitten, and he hired Sherlock Holmes to find it. So I guess Holmes is canonical to Lord Peter.

Keep in mind that I write from the perspective of someone who has had very little experience with Sherlock Holmes stories in the past and knows next to nothing about the canon Mycroft.

In Elementary, I haven't liked Mycroft as a character, mostly because he's kind of boring and he just gets in the way of the Holmes and Watson relationship. And I'm not picking up on any chemistry at ALL between him and Watson, so it's strange to think that there's some sort of sexual attraction there.

After this past episode, I am liking Mycroft more. He just got interesting! I hope that he IS evil, I think that would be awesome. The phone conversation could have meant so many things, but what I initially took away from it, especially due to the comment that Sherlock hasn't seen or spoken to his father in years, was that Mycroft was planning to murder their father, or in fact already had (and had been acting as him when hiring Watson/sending messages). Thinking back on the scene later, this is just one of many possibilities and it might not even be the best one, but for some reason that was the first idea that struck me.

Also, when Mycroft tore up the letter, I detected a hint of jealousy in his facial expression. A sort of mix of anger, envy, and disgust. Which makes me think that Mycroft would be very unhappy about the idea of Sherlock having a better relationship with their father. And that he possibly hates their father enough to kill him.

Perhaps he wanted to lure Sherlock to London to frame him for the murder?

Keep in mind that I write from the perspective of someone who has had very little experience with Sherlock Holmes stories in the past and knows next to nothing about the canon Mycroft.

Click to expand...

In the Canon, Mycroft is Sherlock's older brother (by seven years, I believe). He is a corpulent man who essentially lives (and sometimes works) at the Diogenes Club in Pall Mall. He's described as a minor government clerk, but he's shown to be far more important to the Empire than mere clerk. He is smarter and more observant than Sherlock; unfortunately, he's also lazy and only goes out to travel between the Diogenes and his office. The world is burning down if Mycroft goes somewhere, anywhere else.

There's some question about whether or not Mycroft is Nero Wolfe's father, but that has no bearing here.

With that description, you can see why I haven't been drawn to Elementary's Mycroft. He's not a public servant. He travels. He's not observant, and he seems outclassed mentally by Sherlock.

And, yes, I know I'm trying to fit Ifans' Mycroft into a Canon-shaped mold that he may not be suited for. The only thing I ask is that he not be evil. I don't know that I could handle that.

It occurs to me that in some ways, this version of Sherlock Holmes was more like the original in the past but has now grown beyond it -- he used to be a consulting detective in London and dabbled in drug use, but then the drugs got out of hand and now he's gone through rehab and started a new life and has reformed some of his old ways, at least to an extent. Mycroft seems to be portrayed similarly -- he used to be fat and lazy, according to Sherlock, but now he's remade himself. So these Holmes brothers are like an evolution beyond the canonical ones, in a sense. So the characteristics they had in the canon inform them without limiting them.