Translations in this website are protected by copyright law. Don't claim any of my translations as your own, and please if you publish them anywhere attribute them to me.
Some translations I post will have been provided by someone other than me, and when that is the case it will be made clear on the pages containing those translations; if you want to copy those translations you must first obtain permission from the people who provided them, as I don't have the right to give you such permissions, and please carefully observe the rights of the authors of the original material that has been translated.

Okay I'm looking at this B-A-B-A-B-A-B, four choruses framing three verses.

In the first A-section, you refer to Wisdom as "it". As this is a Christian song, I would think that a direct translation of "elle" as "she" -- referring to Wisdom -- would have been more in line with the biblical usages found in the books of Proverbs and Ecclesiasticus. That this is a scriptural reading is reinforced by the clear statement of the Gospel in the 2nd verse, and the paraphrase or adaptation of the 23rd Psalm in the third verse.

Yes, sure - but do we want to apersonalise God's Wisdom as a sentient bsheing or is a a ship or some other non-living object to which a gender is commonly assigned in English? I don't think that the answer to that question is "yes".

If I took that article as guidance, I would reach the same conclusin that Wisdom should not be personified here.

"Wisdom" is not any of Insight (or prophecy), Helpfulness (or service or ministry), Instruction (teaching), Encouragement, Gving (or generosity), Leadership (or guidance) and Compassion. Those are the seven spirits. Or it could mean the seven (mostly apocryphal) angels whose names are Uriel(God is light), Raphael (God is healing), Raguel (God is justice), Michael, Sarakiel, Gabriel (God is my message?), and Ramiel - and none of those is "Wisdom" either.

The Old Testament was written in the Hebrew of a long time ago, a language in whose grammar all nouns and pronouns were either masculine or feminine. It had no neuter pronoun (like German "es" and English "it"). So the pronoun representing a grammatically feminine noun would correspond to English "her" or "she" and that representing a grammatically masculine noun would correspond to English "he" or "him". So it's quite possible that the use of "she" occurrs in a translation simply because it's not possible to determine from the original whether a real world gender (and hence a life form) was implied or merely a word's grammatical gender.