A brief story on The Official Xbox Magazine offers some tidbits from their upcoming issue 78 on the just-announcedSyndicate reinvention, focusing on the game's new first-person shooter approach. "It was always going to be an FPS," Starbreeze game director Neil McEwan tells them. "The original nub of the idea was to take that viewpoint from the original game and zoom into the Agent's head, and play that part. A closer experience - to become one of those Agents."

In spite of the genre change, he still feels they can be true to the original. "We're big fans of the original Syndicate, and we're definitely paying as much homage to it as we can - bringing across the essence of the world, the core essence of what it is to be an Agent," he explains. "That sounds wanky but it's true - we're taking the Persuadatron and evolving it in different ways, the weapons and brutality. On both facets of the game, the co-op and the single player, it's very key to stay true to it." He also offers this reassurance for disgruntled Bullfrog fans: "I think the game speaks for itself. We've been very lucky to work with a great, original world, and create another facet of it really. I would love them to like it. You're never going to please everyone."

I, like many are truly disappointed (and rightly so) over the direction this new Syndicate is going, I ask you all this.

Regardless of the fact that it is and will be a FPS, would you:

Rather have the new Syndicate sell well (being a decent game or not) and possibly spawn more FPS sequels, and have the IP live on (with a bleak possibility of another official Syndicate title in the vein of the classics)?

Or have the new Syndicate sell poorly (decent game or not) with neigh a possibility of any Syndicate sequels, be it FPS or another perspective? Since I'd imagine poor sales would equate to never seeing anything "Syndicate" ever again.