Question: if Murray plays the French Open, do you think he deserves the 2nd seed? I June they don't deviate from the rankings, but I would seed them like this:1. Nadal2. Novak 3. Federer 4. Ferrer5. Murray

Question: if Murray plays the French Open, do you think he deserves the 2nd seed? I June they don't deviate from the rankings, but I would seed them like this:1. Nadal2. Novak 3. Federer 4. Ferrer5. Murray

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I made the seeding with Wimbledon-like formula. With Wimbledon formula, you practically can get 4000 extra points at maximum. So, I doubled the points from RG, Madrid, and Rome, to give 4000 extra points at maximum. Here would be the seeding.

murray, del potro and wawrinka pull out of roland garros 2013.......murray with a back injury, del potro with some respiratory infection and stan the woman couldn't take two straight weeks of tennis in madrid and rome........

Logged

Marian Vajda to Novak Djokovic, "I saw you beat that man like I never saw no man get beat before, and the man KEPT COMING AFTER YOU! Now we don't need no man like that in our lives."

With Murray and Delpotro out, and Stan injured, I think the path is clear for Dimitrov. He has the skills and now he's got the luck of the draw on his side as well. The only people who can really bother him are Murray, Del Potro and Stan.

I don't know how far that would get Dimitrov but he isn't strong on endurance.He has a long way to go to challenge the best and with his endurance problems a best of five on clay doesn't look to be his best chance to far.

I don't know how far that would get Dimitrov but he isn't strong on endurance.He has a long way to go to challenge the best and with his endurance problems a best of five on clay doesn't look to be his best chance to far.

Well the way I see it, Dimitrov owns Djokovic, who in turn owns Nadal, who in turn owns Federer - and between those three, they own everyone else. So logically, Dimitrov owns everyone. So he should be the favourite.

I don't know how far that would get Dimitrov but he isn't strong on endurance.He has a long way to go to challenge the best and with his endurance problems a best of five on clay doesn't look to be his best chance to far.

Well the way I see it, Dimitrov owns Djokovic, who in turn owns Nadal, who in turn owns Federer - and between those three, they own everyone else. So logically, Dimitrov owns everyone. So he should be the favourite.

I don't know how far that would get Dimitrov but he isn't strong on endurance.He has a long way to go to challenge the best and with his endurance problems a best of five on clay doesn't look to be his best chance to far.

Well the way I see it, Dimitrov owns Djokovic, who in turn owns Nadal, who in turn owns Federer - and between those three, they own everyone else. So logically, Dimitrov owns everyone. So he should be the favourite.

negative general. nadal has a positive record against ALL of the top guns.

and dimitrov has to show that he can do it in best of 5 sets foremats.

I don't know how far that would get Dimitrov but he isn't strong on endurance.He has a long way to go to challenge the best and with his endurance problems a best of five on clay doesn't look to be his best chance to far.

Well the way I see it, Dimitrov owns Djokovic, who in turn owns Nadal, who in turn owns Federer - and between those three, they own everyone else. So logically, Dimitrov owns everyone. So he should be the favourite.

negative general. nadal has a positive record against ALL of the top guns.

and dimitrov has to show that he can do it in best of 5 sets foremats.

that is a lot harder assignment.

still I wish dynamitrov the best.

Dimitrov is a good player, is coming along well and is showing improvement.

I couldn't imagine how he could fight against the top guns for hours on clay.Not just physical but mentally a huge battle.