Total Pageviews

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Can an
intelligent film that teaches kids to talk about their feelings (including sad
ones) be the feel-good film of the summer? Pixar’s latest animated film answers
that with a joyful “yes.”

The story of Inside Out takes place inside the head of an 11-year old
girl named Riley and features colorful characters that represent her
feelings: Anger, Disgust, Fear, Joy and Sadness.

I enjoyed this sophisticated film as if it was just for me,
and the young kids with me (ages 6 and 8) were glued to the screen as well.
They giggled and learned about feelings. If this film helps prove that you
don’t have to have madcap visuals and fart jokes to hold kid-sized attention,
then it’s done us one more favor too.

Simply
put: My emotions were feeling simultaneously happy and sad
while watching this film, and that’s the point.

Award
potential: If Up can score a
Best Picture nod, maybe this could
too. We’ll see how the rest of the year goes, but it’s a lock for a Best Animated Filmnomination.

Tuesday, June 16, 2015

The A in YA.2015 Sundance Grand Jury Prize winner and YA dramedy Me and Earl and the Dying Girl arrives just in time this summer to mirror the blockbuster counter programing success of last year's The Fault In Our Stars. That fine film had the support of loyal John Green fans and shattered both box office and critical expectations of a "cancer movie." Jesse Andrews' book may not have that kind of following, but the film could be just as successful. Because it's a slightly better film.

It's the story of Greg, an awkward high-school senior, his "business partner" Earl and Rachel, a girl at school who has been diagnosed with leukemia.The film is directed by fresh new director Alfonso Gomez-Rejon and benefits from the on screen charisma of Thomas Mann (Greg).

It's original, it's charming in an unforced way and it's one of the best films of 2015 so far.Simply put:500 Days of Summer + The Fault In Our Stars - Terms of EndearmentAward potential: Thomas Mann's believable work as Greg is award quality, but a realistic prediction for a YA dramedy would be that the film has a good shot at one major nomination — Best PIcture, Comedy at the Golden Globes. The ten buck review: Worth ten bucks.

Monday, June 15, 2015

Ironically, time
has been kind to this series about prehistoric beasts. I was amazed at how fun
it was to go back to Jurassic Park. Even though the story is always the same,
this film was fresh with new thrills. Plus, it has a true superstar lead — the
unlikely new summer action hero, Chris Pratt.

The effects are
first-class, the script is tight and the slow and suspenseful scenes are mixed
nicely with high-action.

Credit to indie
director Colin Trevorrow and executive producer Steven Spielberg, who have
filled the film with enough movie magic and winking self-consciousness that I
never felt like it’s the monster + run movie the script surely is. It’s a
roaring good time.

Simply put: Now
that’s how you do a summer sequel.

Award potential: It could be nominated for all
technical awards, despite being the fourth in a series.

When HBO’s Sex & The City appeared on the big
screen four years after the series finale, it was a guilty thrill to see the
key characters together one more time. When the key Entourage players return four years after their finale, none of that
magic hits the screen.

I’m not sure why
this didn’t work. Girls, cars, penthouses, yachts and Hollywood settings should
have been (Ari) Gold for a summer movie.

One argument is
that none of these actors have done quality work since the show so they feel
stuck on the small screen. But that’s not the only thing; the story just isn’t
any fun. For some reason it’s flatter and more unbelievable than the series’
worst TV episode.

Simply put: Loved
the show. Was bored in the movie and didn’t laugh once.

Tuesday, June 2, 2015

I’d like to praise
writer-director Brad Bird (Up, Mission
Impossible: Ghost Protocal)for
attempting to give us an elevated summer action film with ideas and thoughts
worth pondering on long after the credits roll. But the ideas never match the
initial wonder phase and it just doesn’t add up to a cohesive two-hour film.

What begins with
wonder, moves to a convoluted plot and ends with condescending sermonizing and the
most anti climatic finale of the year so far.

Even the tone is
confusing. I’m not sure if this film was supposed to be the next Back to the Future, San Andreas,Spy Kids,Wall-E or Terminator 2. Actually,
I think it shifted across all of these.

On the plus side,
the kids acted their parts better than George Clooney who seemed to just be
going through the motions. Keep your eye on Britt Robertson; she could be the
next Julia Roberts.

Simply put: Like some of the rides at DisneyLand; not for adults. It’s fine for
kids who will enjoy the possibilities presented in Tomorrowland, but it’s a solid no for everyone else who should skip
this never, never again land.