Series: One World Governance

There can be little doubt which word won the prize for most important adjective in 2009. This was the year in which "global" swept the rest of the political lexicon into obscurity. There were "global crises" and "global challenges", the only possible resolution to which lay in "global solutions" necessitating "global agreements".
[Would these global agreements] sweep away any consideration of what was once assumed to be the most basic principle of modern democracy: that elected national governments are responsible to their own people – that the right to govern derives from the consent of the electorate.
There'll be nowhere to run from the new world government
– Janet Daley

... Communitarianism is a political system that gives authority over individuals to unelected community "stakeholder" councils. A stakeholder is defined as a "group, person, organization or system" which can be just about anybody or anything. You'll find the term used in just about every government and grant funded project in existence today ... Forming partnerships with stakeholders is an effective way to bypass voters and taxpayers.
Our Common Community - Niki Raapana.

In previous parts of this article we have explored the architecture of the new system of Global Governance and the importance to that system of networked civil society NGO's and Partnerships. Funding for such networks being conditional upon them collectively pursuing policies linked to Agenda 21.

Despite the available evidence there are some who still promote the belief that discussion about the establishment of World Governance is nothing other than one of a number of conspiracy theories that are corroding our society.

Despite the volume of evidence that I have already presented in relation to the organisation, Common Purpose, one issue is becoming increasingly clear - The British Media generally neglects to inform the British public of its' activities and has also failed to educate its' readership in relation to the the United Nations Agenda 21 programme.

I have received a number of emails from readers of my series of articles, One World Governance - A Common Purpose. A few readers have pointed out to us that they are finding it difficult to visualise the relationships between the various organisations promoting the United Nations Global Agenda.

The United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005 - 2014), for which UNESCO is the lead agency, seeks to integrate the principles, values and practices of sustainable development into all aspects of education and learning, in order to address the social economic and cultural and environmental problems we face in the 21st Century
- UNESCO Education for sustainable development

The net closes in on every man, woman and child. The fishing net is an effective hunting weapon. Simple, easily made, the net is initially not seen by the fish, and then when they eventually encounter the mesh, all escape routes are blocked. The net encircles them, traps them and ultimately allows the fish to be pulled from their living environment to be killed.

If this was 1940 and not 2016 the blatant anti-British propaganda being showered upon the public by state broadcaster the BBC and other news publications could well have competed for the Joseph Goebels award for honesty. What we are witnessing today with the systematic talking down of Britain now makes the historical broadcasting of William Joyce (Lord Haw Haw) appear patriotic.

David Miliband, president of a New York based refugee "charity" supported by hefty donations from George Soros amongst others, is paid a staggering £425,000 per annum. What do we know of Miliband and his International Rescue Committee?

The overall objective of the internationalists is the undermining of the independent, self governing, Westphalian Nation State and its system of governance, replaced by a new order more favourable to them.

In the new political and economic system of the 21st century an ever increasing number of non-governmental organisations, often working collaboratively in networks, who now claim to better represent individuals, or as we are now called, "Civil Society".

In recent months the most discussed political issue has been Brexit and our future relationship with the remaining members of the European Union. Most mainstream commentators have missed the growing threat to independent sovereign Nations posed by Global Governance. The power to make many of our laws has long since shifted to organisations operating at the global level.

In this article we will investigate if the actions of Welsh politicians reflects the wishes of the majority of the Welsh electorate or promotes the policies of those with global interests. The former state represents true democracy whilst the latter evidences dictatorship.

The British press have long had the tendency to sensationalise the mundane and, in relation to issues of national significance, either omit them entirely or report deliberately skewed half truths and untruths.

With the release of the iPhone X people have been asked to accept a new level of biometric intrusion so that their phone can identify them. But is this a simple security measure, or is there a global policy agenda at work?

“The powers of financial capitalism had a far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. The system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.” - Caroll Quigley in his book Tragedy and Hope

The Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy—created by the European Commission in 2008—went mercurial last June when U.S. President Trump gave a cold shoulder to “global warming” by announcing he was distancing America from the 2015 Paris climate agreement.