Two of the corporations involved in major book scanning have sawed off the bindings of modern books to speed the digitizing process. Many have a negative visceral reaction to the "butchering" of books, but is this a reasonable reaction?

A reason to preserve the physical book that has been digitized is that it is the authentic and original version that can be used as a reference in the future. If there is ever a controversy about the digital version, the original can be examined. A seed bank such as the Svalbard Global Seed Vault is seen as an authoritative and safe version of crops we are growing. Saving physical copies of digitized books might at least be seen in a similar light as an authoritative and safe copy that may be called upon in the future.

I went to the launch open house thing on Sunday, since it's only about 30 blocks down the hill from my house.

It's a very cool facility, I want one. According to their physical book storage specialist, books are like sponges. To the point that they drop 1/3 of their weight after running the dehumidifiers for a while. He says the converted storage containers weight 60,000lbs when first filled with books, and 40,000lbs later when the moisture has been sucked out.

Until I can walk into a retail location or my own living room and buy or perform my own service that produces a book that works the exact same way as a international publisher's books, digital books fail. They fail on so many levels. My Kindle is basically a passive entertainment device, despite my deep desire for it to also be a reference guide for knowledge.