澳洲作业代写:威尔斯

2017-04-02 00:25

这么说，威尔斯含蓄地承认了法律的内在不足的时候问自己难以回答的问题。因此，我们看到了激进女权主义。刑事司法系统建立在虚拟假设自己的假定性；它具有如威尔斯问外部问题。因此必须寻找其它的系统规范，如道德、去如为什么刑事司法系统的失败，克拉克如此严重的问题的根源和查看。威尔斯认为，“女权主义的论点是非常重要的开始解开这些问题。”[ 5 ]是，她认为社会建构女性养育者给我们别的想法；什么是坏的。她引用了奥克利，他说，“所有的事情，女人应该是，母亲是第一位的。”[ 6 ]的说法是，法律制度，是隐式的男性，增强实施妇女这些基本定型化的形象；在克拉克和查看的情况下，它对道德的重要男性系统在他们身上，其结果是完全无辜的妇女被定罪。此外，威尔斯认为，“医学化和制度化，提高繁殖和婴儿发展的[ 7 ]进一步印证了好妈妈的社会刻板印象。这反过来影响了法律，作为一个系统接受标准的系统，如医学，因为他们自称客观性（因此阳刚之气，许多女权主义者认为）。因此，从1623起到“强制母亲杀婴的兴起的法律发展有什么女性应当增强医疗父权观点。[ 8 ]，后者是指一组行为被视为适当的好母亲，并为妇女有望进入。澳洲作业代写:威尔斯
In so remarking, Wells implicitly acknowledges the inherent inadequacy of the law when it comes to asking difficult questions about itself. Thus, we see a flicker of radical feminism. The criminal justice system rests on fictitious assumptions regarding its own presumed infallibility; it is resistant to external questions such as those asked by Wells. One therefore has to look to other systems of norms, such as morality, to get to the root of questions such as why the criminal justice system failed Clark and Cannings so badly. Wells contends that ‘Feminist arguments are crucial in beginning to unravel these questions.’[5] In particular, she argues that the social construct of women as nurturers feeds into our ideas of what is unwomanly; with what is bad. She quotes Oakley, who remarks that ‘Of all the things women are supposed to be, mothers come first.’[6] The argument is that the legal system, being implicitly male, reinforced and implemented these essentially stereotypical images of women; in the case of Clark and Cannings, it imposed an essential male system of morality onto them, with the result that two completely innocent women were convicted.In addition, Wells argues that the ‘increased medicalisation and institutionalisation of reproduction and infant development’[7] has further bolstered the social stereotype of the good mother. This in turn affects the law, which as a system is receptive to systems of standards such as medicine because of their professed objectivity (and therefore masculinity, as many feminists would argue). Thus, legal developments from the Infanticide Act 1623 to the rise of ‘compulsory motherhood’ have reinforced medical and patriarchal views of what women ought to be.[8] The latter idea denotes a group of behaviours which are deemed appropriate to good motherhood, and into which women are expected to enter.