Originally Posted by Gorath
Wasn't it blatantly obvious that there was no public beta? It was an early demo, nothing more.

I don't think that it matters what it is called, the important issue is that the current problems were present then and developer had so much feedback (see comments from members of the watch with access to this 'demo') on this early 'demo' - in fact reading current reviews and opinions about the problems is like reading the previews that were published months ago! A decent developer would have addressed these obvious issues with a day-one patch.