The US has responded to past terrorist outrages with conciliation. This time, the reaction must be different

http://www.jewishworldreview.com --
All over the world this morning, eyes are turning to America to see what policy it will pursue in the wake of this attack. Although it is early, the outline of some of the opinion is forming. Many US and European observers, and some in the Middle East, are sending America their condolences.

But they are also saying that America, through its arrogance, and the Bush administration, through its unilateralism and casual militarism, brought this disaster upon itself. Governments that do not negotiate with terrorists will incur their wrath. The west as a whole, the thesis goes, is paying for America's cavalier attitude.

In one sense, Tuesday's tragedy is worse than Pearl Harbor. It appears to be the first large-scale attack by outsiders on the mainland US since the British war of 1812. Many pundits posit that it will force a great awakening in the US, an awakening to realities that the rest of the world has already confronted. The great test for the States now is to prove that it can absorb the lesson and learn the art of accommodation.

This is the wrong interpretation. Uncle Sam is the target here and terrorists are the attackers. The great test for the US will be to demonstrate, through decisive policy, that it has recognised the truth: that terrorists are martial enemies and that they must be confronted as such. Not accommodated, not negotiated with, but targeted and stopped just as they might be in a straightforward military battle. And that failure to do so will bring repeats of just the sort of nightmare that we have seen this week.

Consider the western policy in the Middle East, from where, as I write, the attack seems to have emanated. For a full generation, since Israel's Yom Kippur war in the early 1970s, administrations from both parties have pursued a policy of conciliation. Rather than support Israel or the anti-terror advocates in Arab nations, they have chosen to parley with the terrorists - on the theory that they were victims, weaker than others in the region.

The notion was that big powers and their allies, including Israel, must let themselves be subjected to the tyranny of the weak. Noblesse- or hyperpuissance - oblige. A superpower must pay for its status by forgiving and understanding weaker parties.

This policy of appeasement has wrought terrible damage. Specifically, it has confirmed terrorists' unrealistic vision of the US, emboldening them to launch just the sort of cartoon-like attack we have experienced. The terrorists who planned this made-for-Hollywood bloodbath took the US for a much smaller country than it is in reality. They believed that a theatrical suicide bombing of important national symbols would throw the nation into hysteria and that it would turn in on itself and away from foreign involvement.

They have seen such a turning-in before. Call it the Terrorism as Hydra phenomenon. Each time the US was assailed - and it was not often - domestic observers labelled the problem "terrorism" and looked no further. After the 1988 downing of the Pan Am Lockerbie plane, the campaign to locate the terrorists and bring them to justice was a mere sideshow. Most Americans focused rather on compensation and consolation for the loss - on the tragedy of the families whose relatives had died in that flight.

Throughout the 1990s, especially after the first World Trade Center bombing nine years ago, airports and train stations and the World Trade Center itself obsessed about terrorism security measures. Gate checks, border checks and elevator passes became a routine way of life and were viewed as the antidote to the vague threat of trouble from abroad. To blame were anonymous, shadowy figures - "terrorists" - and no specific individual or political group. It all amounted to a culture of self-blame. If only we guard ourselves better, Americans thought, we shall be protected.

This ostrich attitude is bound to continue to obtain, to some degree. All yesterday afternoon, the radio and television were full of remonstrations. People argued that America ought to have expected just such an attack in the early 1990s, after the Gulf war, or that citizens must move away from potentially dangerous targets such as the World Trade Center, or send their children to schools in the suburbs, away from the trouble.

But there is also another awakening in process, of a different sort. It is a national recognition that it is the perpetrators who are the enemy and not the US itself. In other words, many people in the US are undergoing a great awakening. It is not the awakening to the importance of conciliation; it is the awakening of a sleeping giant.

From Washington, this will translate into a military response. US leaders - Donald Rumsfeld, the secretary of defence, Colin Powell, the secretary of state, and President George W. Bush will plan retaliation.

And this time US citizens are likely to be supportive. It is important to recall that the US is a country that went to war over the invasion of one far-off country - Kuwait - by another - Iraq. And that Congress backed the president through Desert Shield and Desert Storm. This time national support for action is likely to be far stronger.

I live a mile from the World Trade Center bombing. Outside my window on Tuesday morning, snow seemed to be falling. Only it was not snow but ashes, the dust from the World Trade Center's collapse. As I watched it accumulate, I thought: this is the sort of thing that happens in wars, and in Europe, but not here. I also reflected that this was indeed an end to American naivety - the belief that we Americans cannot be touched by war. But the attack will also, I hope, bring with it a new understanding here that America can stop war, if only it recognises it for what it
is.

08/15/01: Geography is no excuse for the state's economic stagnation. Its policymakers should take a leaf from Ireland's book08/07/01: Teamsters may pay a heavy price for winning its batle in Congress07/25/01: Towards a patent-free nirvana?07/17/01: History proves the lasting value of tax cuts 07/10/01: Stem cell research has awakened a bitter debate in Washington but voters care more about other electoral issues
07/03/01: America foots the bill for Europe's largesse06/26/01: America the litigious, land of the lawyer's fee06/20/01: Five reasons for gloom about global growth
06/18/01: Show pity for Alice in Tax Wonderland06/13/01: America must take a French lesson in trade06/11/01: Time to dream the impossible dream for Iraq06/07/01: Whatever happened to simple?06/04/01: When the relationship between companies becomes as close as a marriage, the eventual break-up is often very painful06/01/01: Loving and hating the Bush tax bill05/30/01: Will Grisham soon be unemployed? In America's courts these days, there's no room left over for legal fiction05/22/01: Republicans sample the rhetoric of confidence05/16/01: Boeing has been promised $60m to site its headquarters in Illinois. The deal looks a poor one for taxpayers05/14/01: Adam Smith in love05/09/01: Those rotten Russian capitalists 05/07/01: Why tax havens provide shelter for everyone05/04/01: Middle classes pay for get-the-rich folly05/01/01: Money can't buy happiness? Think again. 04/26/01: Calling America's rogues and entrepreneurs04/19/01: High earners right to feel lonely at the top04/11/01: The right must learn the comfort of strangers04/04/01: When domestic law arrives by the back door03/30/01: A Lexus tax cut suits the jalopy driver03/27/01: The unchallenged dominance of King Dollar03/20/01: Natural selection of an intellectual aristocracy03/16/01: The hidden danger of a regulatory recession03/14/01: Is the American condition that boring? Why so many Oscar nominated movies aren't set in America03/07/01: Trampling on the theory of path dependence03/05/01: Fighting the good fight03/01/01: It is time for Fannie and Freddie to grow up02/27/01: IT's important02/22/01: The guilty conscience of America's millionaires02/14/01: The benefits of helping the 'rich'02/09/01: The Danger and Promise of the Bush Schools Plan02/05/01: Crack and Compassion 01/31/01: Debt is good01/29/01: Clueless01/24/01: A gloomy end for a half-hearted undertaking01/17/01: The challenge of an ally with its own mind01/15/01: An unexpected American family portrait01/10/01: A fitting legacy for America's beloved dictator 01/08/01: The trick of tax 'convenience' 01/03/01: Time to stop blaming Greenspan over taxes 12/11/00: So smart they're dumb 12/06/00: How economic bad news came good for Bush12/04/00: The Boies factor 11/30/00: "The inevitable demands for recounts erupted like acne…"11/28/00: Fair play and the rules of the electoral game11/23/00: The shining prospect beyond a cloudy election11/21/00: Try the Cleveland model11/16/00: A surprising winner emerges in the US election11/09/00: Those powerful expats11/07/00:
What's right for America versus what works11/02/00: Time to turn off big government's autopilot10/30/00: Canada beating America in financial sensibility10/26/00: When progressiveness leads to backwardness10/24/00: The most accurate poll10/19/00: The Middle East tells us the hawks were right 10/17/00: The split personalities of America's super rich 10/10/00: 'Equity Rights' or Wake up and Smell the Starbucks10/04/00: Trapped in the basement of global capitalism09/21/00: The final act of a grand presidential tragedy09/21/00: Europeans strike back at the fuel tax monster. Should Americans follow?09/18/00: First steps to success09/13/00: America rejects the human rights transplant09/07/00: Minimum wage, maximum cost09/05/00: Prudent Al Gore plans some serious spending08/31/00: A revolution fails to bring power to the people08/28/00: A reali$tic poll08/21/00: "I Goofed" 08/16/00: Part of the union, but not part of the party
08/09/00: Silicon Alley Secrets08/02/00: Radical Republicans warm up for Philadelphia07/31/00: I'll Cry if I Want To07/27/00: Cold warrior of the new world07/25/00: The Estate Tax will drop dead07/18/00: Shooting down the anti-missile defence myths07/14/00: A convenient punchbag for America's leaders07/07/00: How to destroy the pharmaceutical industry07/05/00: Patriots and bleeding hearts06/30/00: Candidates beware: New Washington consensus on robust growth stands the old wisdom on its head06/28/00: White America's flight to educational quality06/26/00: How Hillary inspired the feminist infobabes