The communists are indisputably, historically one of the most dangerous ideologies in human history. But where are the people protesting when there are very visible communist elements all over America and the western world?

We are a group dedicated to crushing the communists down to the last man using any LEGAL means necessary. Anything that strays into the category of illegal should be done anonymously in the name of 4chan as to not soil our cause in the eyes of the public. This is not a political ideology and we will not express official support for any party or candidate, our goal is simply to reduce the political influence and membership of the communist party down to zero.

Objective 1: Deprogramming and reeducation is something that everybody is at least aware of by now this is commonly called "redpilling" (although when it comes to communism this term becomes muddied as all you need to despise commies is basic history). We should pursue this objective with a stream of anti-communist memes, arguments, historical knowledge, articles etc.

Objective 2: Application of the full penalty of the law against all nonredeemable communist agents. This is a vague but all encompassing idea, which we should work to achieve in every possible scenario. IE exposing identities of rioters, suing in civil court, exposing unrelated crimes of all communists/sympathizers, no crime is too small to peruse although felonies are preferred so that we can systematically destroy the political power of communist organizations. I also interpret this to include triggering them into committing serious crimes and riots against public/private property (especially in leftist areas) to turn moderates away from alt-left extremism. I also interpret this to using self defense laws to the maximum extent/lethality if the scenario calls for it.

Objective 3: Much like the project veritas crew who exposed the communist gas attack plot, we should seek to infiltrate, subvert, collect evidence, and sabotage communist organizations and satellites.

Objective 4: To ensure that communists are as vilified in western culture as members of the nazi party.

Rules:

No commies/sympathizers: You'll be cut down where you stand.

If you love Representative democracy, state rights, the constitution, national sovereignty, and hate communists and are willing to take action, then welcome aboard, feel free to post anything that you think has the power to delegitimize, expose, or refute the ideas or agents of communism. Also encouraged are field reports of crimes that have been brought against communists through citizen reporting.

The CIA has given us the tools to analyze and defeat the communists. It's up to us to learn and use them. (check out pg 49 of pdf /43 of original doc and see how strikingly accurate their description of the enemy we see now is.)

The two pronged approach that they recommend is something we are already familiar with.

Objective 1: Deprogramming and reeducation is something that everybody is at least aware of by now this is commonly called "redpilling" (although when it comes to communism this term becomes muddied as all you need to despise commies is basic history). We should pursue this objective with a stream of anti-communist memes, arguments, historical knowledge, articles etc.

Objective 2: Application of the full penalty of the law against all nonredeemable communist agents. This is a vague but all encompassing idea, which we should work to achieve in every possible scenario. IE exposing identities of rioters, suing in civil court, exposing unrelated crimes of all communists/sympathizers, no crime is too small to peruse although felonies are preferred so that we can systematically destroy the political power of communist organizations. I also interpret this to include triggering them into committing serious crimes and riots against public/private property (especially in leftist areas) to turn moderates away from alt-left extremism. I also interpret this to using self defense laws to the maximum extent/lethality if the scenario calls for it.

Objective 3: Much like the project veritas crew who exposed the communist gas attack plot, we should seek to infiltrate, subvert, collect evidence, and sabotage communist organizations and satellites.

Oh and definitely don't ever weaponize any of the information from (pg 18 pdf) of the CIA civilian sabotage guide against them or any hostile satellite organization.

Hegel lived from 1770 to 1831 and Marx lived from 1818 to 1883. Marx was
13 years old when Hegel died. Hegelianism was dominant in Berlin when
Marx, then nineteen years old, arrived there and began studying Hegel.
Hegel influenced Marx but Marx had no influence on Hegel. In other
words, Hegel is not a Marxist and Marx is not a Hegelian. Hegel was a
systematic philosopher who tried to encompass everything in his
philosophy. Marx was a political economist who relentlessly criticized
capitalism and sought a better system. They both used the same general
analytical method, called dialectics, to analyze history and society.
Dialectics supposes that everything, including people and societies,
exists in a state of tension, internally with unrealized aspects of
itself, and externally with other entities. The resolution of these
tensions takes place in history and will eventually lead to a perfect
society. The first part of this process is called thesis and refers to
the presently known state of whatever is in question. The unrealized
aspects, or more generally anything in conflict with the present state,
is called the antithesis. The resolutions of the conflict is called
synthesis. Neither Hegel nor Marx invented this method, it gots back at least to socrates, but Marx drew
most heavily from Hegel's formulation of it.

Hegel thought the state was the highest social achievement of man. Marx
thought the state would fade away after the masses took power. Hegel
disliked popular sovereignty and thought it would lead to social chaos.
Marx thought "the people" would made the best rulers after the state
vanishes.

For Hegel reality develops by a rational process from the individual to
a rational authoritarian state run by a monarch. For Marx the most
important and far reaching aspect of reality consists in the modes of
economic production present in a state. Members of the working class are
alienated from each other and themselves until they develop a
self-consciousness that becomes a class consciousness. The workers then
understand the oppressive system they inhabit and that only by rebelling
against the owners of the means of production, overthrowing the state,
and replacing it with an arrangement in which the workers own the means
of production and run the state, can they become truly free and fully
realized individuals.

Hegel's state is a collection of rational individuals ruled by a
monarch. Individuals are born into a state and develop in it, and
because of it, into free, rational beings. Individuals can only be free
and fully realized in a highly organized, rational, and authoritarian
state. Such states develop through the increasing rational understanding
of society and history. This knowledge is then used to identify and fix
social problems. In this way society continuously moves toward a perfect
state.

In Marx also individuals are born into a state which is at a certain
stage of development. All states develop, but Marx and Hegel have
different views of how that development takes place and the final end
thereof. In Hegel the focus is on individuals developing full
self-realization in the context of a state which is itself developing
toward a rational monarchy. A competitive free market economy provides
the material motor for all development. In Marx free market capitalism
is the oppressive mode of production that must be removed by force. In
Marx people are born into a state consisting of specific class divisions
and relations. The conflict between the class that owns and controls the
means and manner of economic production and those that actually make the
goods that are sold is the motor of social change. Through the
resolution of these conflicts by overthrowing the owners of the means of
production the centralized state will disappear and people's affairs
will be handled by themselves without an authoritarian state or king
telling them what to do.

Had these two strongly opinionated individuals met each other they would've had sharp disagreements, culminating with Hegel's boot impacting Marx's boils. I would've good money paid to see that.