Indian-Origin Student's Conviction For Spying On Gay Roommate Who Then Committed Suicide May Be Reversed

01/04/2015 10:06 AM IST
|
Updated
15/07/2016 8:25 AM IST

Press Trust Of India

NEW! HIGHLIGHT AND SHARE

Highlight text to share via Facebook and Twitter

ASSOCIATED PRESS

FILE - In this May 30, 2012, file photo, Dharun Ravi, right, sits with his attorney Joseph Benedict during a hearing in New Brunswick, N.J. Ravi, the former Rutgers University student convicted of using his webcam to watch his roommate kiss another man, is due to be released from jail Tuesday, June 19 after serving 20 days of a 30 day sentence. Ravi reported to jail last month even though he could have remained free during an appeal of the case. (AP Photo/Mel Evans, File)

ADVERTISEMENT

NEW YORK — An Indian-origin former Rutgers student, convicted for spying on his gay roommate who then committed suicide, could see his conviction for bias intimidation reversed after the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that the state's law in this regard was unconstitutional.

The apex court last week struck down a portion of the state's bias crime statute that could win Dharun Ravi a new trial in the Tyler Clementi webcam case, his attorney said.

According to the earlier state statute on bias intimidation, defendants can be convicted of bias intimidation if their victims "reasonably believed" they were harassed or intimidated because of their race, colour, gender, ethnicity, religion or sexual orientation.

However, the state Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the 2001 statute was "unconstitutionally vague", striking down the third section of the statute that focused on the victim's state of mind.

The ruling said that it is the defendant's intent and state of mind that is important, not the victim's.

A report in nj.com quoted Ravi's attorney Steven Altman as saying that the decision directly strikes down one of Ravi's convictions, which was based on that section.

The appeal of Ravi's 2012 guilty verdict that included several bias intimidation charges is still ongoing.

The Supreme Court ruling also brings into question decisions made by the trial judge, Superior Court Judge Glenn Berman.

Now retired, Berman permitted the prosecution to produce evidence of Clementi's state of mind to the jury.

Berman did not permit Altman to introduce evidence during the trial that Clementi was upset over his mother's rejection of his homosexuality and other incidents in his life.

Berman also prohibited Altman from obtaining some items seized from Clementi's possessions and computer, including the suicide note, Altman was quoted as saying.

"Now the argument has to be that the judge permitted evidence that taints the entire verdict," the attorney said. "The evidence about Tyler Clementi's state-of-mind. Did that prejudice the jury," he asked.

Middlesex County Prosecutor Andrew Carey, however, said that Ravi's conviction "still stands, and it would be inappropriate to comment further given the state's ongoing appeal of the sentence."