The World’s Most Powerful Jew

We were going to end up with something very like Facebook: The Internet and human nature would have conspired to give us the sort of Website for all-purpose social networking—for virtual living?—that Facebook is. Whatever we ended up with may even have been the product of what The Social Network, the fabulous David Fincher-directed, Aaron Sorkin-written film opening wide Friday, says Facebook was: The nuclear-fission force of one young outsider (Mark Zuckerberg) who desired to become the ultimate insider, surmounting all the barricades in front of him while flipping them a parade of birds.

But we actually ended up with Facebook. It is perhaps the dominant Website for the most people on the globe; it boasts 500 million users; the company is probably worth $33 billion. The barricades of privilege that its creator overcame were not run-of-the-mill, but the ultimate: Facebook was not created at a Harvard manqué; it was literally created at Harvard. And the outsider? He is not a random, one-type-out-of-many outsider, but the ultimate type of outsider: He is not a Jew manqué; he is literally a Jew. So is his co-founder (Eduardo Saverin), and one of his two first employees. I can’t prove this isn’t coincidental, but the circumstantial evidence is on my side. Chiefly: We were going to end up with something very like Facebook, but we actually ended up with Facebook, where everyone is the president of their own elite club of one—the Platonic embodiment of the indelibly Jewish alloy of self-hatred and striving.

The Social Network does not need to prove this coincidence: An independent work of creative art, merely based on reality, it is free to impose the Jewish-outsider-takes-on-Harvard narrative, and it does so thrillingly. Zuckerberg, played curly-haired and runt-ish in a hooded sweatshirt by Jesse Eisenberg, is driven by many things—the girlfriend who breaks up with him in the first scene, the excitement of his own genius—but top among them is the slight he feels at having never gained entrée to Harvard’s elite final clubs. (Crucially, Facebook was intially open only to Harvard students, and pretty soon solely to students at elite schools; its present democratic phase is comparatively recent. In the film, Zuckerberg gets off at this exclusivity.)

Zuckerberg can’t stand that Saverin, his best friend, was “punched” by one of the clubs. He can’t stand the Winklevoss twins—the hunky specimens of entrenched WASP masculinity who first approach him with the idea of a Facebook-like site—who, as per house rules, will not admit him past the “bike room” of their club’s house. On the night that he came up with the idea, he and Saverin were attending a supremely tacky Caribbean-themed party at—as he tells the others seated around the table at one of his depositions (both the Winklevosses and Saverin are suing him)—“Alpha Epsilon Pi.” “What’s that?” a lawyer asks. Zuckerberg is almost too mortified to say the words: “A E Pi. It’s the Jewish fraternity.” (Zuckerberg was a member in real life.)

Yet I have to wonder whether The Social Network’s narrative of Jew-against-all is not a bit dated. After all, long gone are the days when Jews were true outsiders at Harvard and (nearly) everywhere else. In 1969, Philip Roth’s Alexander Portnoy could have parents who marveled at their son’s invitation to Gracie Mansion; today, we live in Gracie Mansion (or, rather, we host parties there, and live in a $30 million townhouse in a better neighborhood). One of my favorite lines from my favorite movie, 1978’s Animal House (set in 1962), is: “Bad news: I just checked with the guys at the Jewish house, and they say all our answers to the Psych test were wrong.” Today, you’d make that joke about the Asian house, or the Indian house—the Jewish house is just another house. At Harvard, I can personally attest, there are Jews in even the most elite final clubs. (Myself, I’ve been inside one of them, The Fox, because my oldest friend was a member. I obviously was not allowed upstairs, but I didn’t particularly care.)

One of the best and most telling moments in a movie stuffed with great and telling moments is a line from one of the few characters in the movie older than 22. Saverin notes that, when Facebook launched, Zuckerberg became the Big Man on Campus at a place filled with Nobel Prize winners, Pulitzer Prize winners, a president who had been the Secretary of the Treasury (by the way, the Larry Summers scene is hilarious), and countless other celebrities, including “a movie star.” “Which movie star?” Zuckerberg’s middle-aged lawyer asks with gossip-y curiosity. Zuckerberg and Savarin, by now mortal enemies, nonetheless share the same grimace.

In my personal experience, elite institutions like Harvard have been democratized such that our parents are much more fascinated by the fact that we are friends with a senator’s son or classmates with a movie star than we ourselves are. At Harvard, the final clubs’ upstairs/downstairs dynamic is a relic, and everyone knows it, and so almost nobody cares. (At Columbia, where I matriculated, the closest thing to a final club is St. A’s, which is known mainly for cocaine and the cover of Vampire Weekend’s first album.) So I am tempted to lend greater credence to psychological portraits of Zuckerberg that downplay his Jewish aspect (incidentally, he identifies as an atheist), and the larger “The final club didn’t let me in” story-line (which Zuckerberg explicitly rejects). As I say, I don’t believe Facebook’s overwhelmingly Jewish origins are pure coincidence: There is surely something left over from our ancestors that, like a line of computer code, commands a greater proportion of us to be more boldly innovative than any other people. But I think this explanation can only take us so far.

The lawyer’s question about the Harvard movie star is also, I’m pretty sure, meant as an in-joke: A young attorney taking notes in the deposition room is played by Rashida Jones, a famous actress who graduated in 1997 from, yup, Harvard. In fact, the inaugural cover of 02138, a magazine for Harvard alums, famously declared, over a picture of Jones, “She’s Harvard. So Are You. (Discuss.)” In fact, even as a student Jones was a celebrity, of a sort: Her father is the legendary music producer Quincy Jones.

Of course, her mother is a Jewish woman. She’s Harvard. So’s Zuckerberg. So are many, many other Jews. There is not much else to discuss.

WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at letters@tabletmag.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

Oh come on. This review is that same old canard that anti-Semites have used forever: we are outsiders, become consummate insiders and then outdo and thereby destroy the club before anyone even knows we’ve done it. Therefore, Beware the Jew.

We get this from our enemies, let’s not get it from our “friends” too.

Jeff Carpentersays:

September 29, 2010 - 1:34 pm

@ Chana Batya: or, as Groucho Marx would say: “I’ll not belong to any club that would have me as a member.”

Chana Batyasays:

September 29, 2010 - 2:21 pm

@Jeff: Don’t we get accused of being both clannish and pushy? “When you let one Jew into your club, s/he brings all their friends with them!!”

I didn’t like the article because it seemed to describe Zuckerberg’s invention of Facebook along these lines.

Better: he’s a really smart guy who figured out what college kids would like, and then he built a huge network based on this. Although many Jews may or may not be really smart, Zuckerberg is clearly both Jewish and smart. Is this news?

There are other non-ethnic explanations for his success. Like: he’s more comfortable with people at a distance than up close. He’s more comfortable with surface than deep relationships. and so on…

Davesays:

September 29, 2010 - 10:30 pm

Typical cliched repetition of culture war nonsense – Jew vs. WASP – how outdated, especially at a time when the U.S.’ population is 33% non-white – meaning, by definition, not Jewish or WASP.

Of course, at the time Zuckerberg went to Harvard, Harvard’s president was Lawrence Summers – who is Jewish (and was in the news lately). Summers’ successor to the Presidency isn’t Jewish, but is married to a Jewish man. At least 20% of Harvard’s students are Jewish. So which so-called “WASP establishment” was Mark Zuckerberg supposed to go up against? Was it the Winklevoss’ Indian-American lawyer? Did Zucky team up with that 20% of Jews to take on Harvard’s Jewish president?

Yet this article and many in the media keep replaying these bizarre cliches about Jews and WASPs, with choice little code words thrown in there (i.e. “curly-haired” – wink, wink! – or “broad-shouldered” – nudge, nudge!). The Armie Hammer character is described in terms just like the one above – “hunky specimens of entrenched WASP masculinity”. Armie Hammer’s Jewish great-grandfather, millionaire (or was it billionaire?) Armand Hammer, must be rolling in his grave. Speaking of which – how many repeating these diatribes have ever even heard of Armand Hammer?

I suspect that if Mark Zuckerberg was good-looking and non-nerdy, and the Winklevosses looked like William H. Macy, no one would ever even bring up the Jewish and WASP angle. Just a thought.

daniel cooksays:

September 30, 2010 - 2:07 pm

interesting

Davidsays:

October 1, 2010 - 8:51 am

Dave,

If you read reviews about this movie or the book, you will find out that both the movie and the book play fast and loose with the facts about the founding of Facebook. While I’m sure lots of parts are true, Sorkin and company also used their vivid imaginations to make the movie more interesting and watchable too.

Alexsays:

October 5, 2010 - 10:55 pm

The “movie star” bit was probably a reference to Natalie Portman (who’s also Jewish) although she actually graduated the year before it launched.

This can be the on the list of superior blogs we ever read. The quality of knowledge in right here may just be spectacular. Such a article is not no problem finding.

linda leesays:

January 1, 2011 - 8:16 pm

Seriously, what’s wrong with your obsession with Jewish or not? How about the guy stole the idea and burned his best friend. Do you still want to claim him as your own?

Mark Mywordssays:

January 18, 2011 - 4:05 pm

A jew playing a jew in the jew media monopoly, WHO CARES, only jews!!!

deesays:

February 9, 2011 - 8:05 pm

Another gratuitous, random reference to Jesse Eisenberg being Jewish? I’m pretty sure that, at this point in the game, every such reference should be accompanied by a mention of the fact that Natalie Portman, Logan Lerman, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Paul Rudd and Mila Kunis are also all Jewish. That’s for starters.

The great thing about these running a blog engines and CMS platforms is the dearth of limitations and ease of manipulation that enables builders to implement rich content and ‘skin’ the location in such a method that with very little effort one would never discover what it is making the site tick all without limiting content and effectiveness.

I enjoy reading this article. I scarcity to learn more on this topic.. Acknowledge gratitude you for journalism leading article this crucial info.. Anyway, I am gonna subscribe to your rss and I craving you erase spectacular articles again soon. Indeed effective info.

I have been looking further into this subject and appreciate your well written post on this matter. I have bookmarked The Worldâ€™s Most Powerful Jew – by Marc Tracy – Tablet Magazine – A New Read on Jewish Life so that I can point back to it and once again, thanks so much for the energy spent creating this post.

Thanks for another informative blog. Where else could I get that kind of info written in such a perfect way? I’ve a project that I am just now working on, and I have been on the look out for such info.

As a result, if you opt to will end up in for anyone stylish but specialist ugg boots clearance Store, it is possible to have a look at several actually cost-effective and also traditional internet vendors that provide fantastic special discounts.

Wonderful job right here. I definitely enjoyed what you had to say. Keep heading because you absolutely bring a new voice to this topic. Not many people would say what youve said and still make it interesting. Well, at least Im interested. Cant wait to see more of this from you.

Where is a good place start a website for business at a very low price?

jack goldmansays:

November 30, 2011 - 12:31 pm

When Semites, Jews, Jewish, Hebrews, Zionists, Israelis, Old Testament, and Torah people (intentional confusion) network to take over and control the world it’s a “religion’. When Christian white males do the same exact thing, building the entire society from scratch, it’s racism. Jews are defined as being born of a certain type of mother, a racist definition, yet it’s a religion? Why is Jewish racism and their love of money, power, and fame a religion, but when others do the same exact thing, it’s racism? Why is it a social injustice for Christian white males to take double what their numbers justify but it’s social justice for Hebrews to take ten to twenty times what their numbers justify? Why the double standards for Jewish holocaust denial and Israeli Zionist Palestinian holocaust denial? Why the double standards? That is the only question I have. Where is rule of law when two groups are treated differently based on having a certain kind of mother? Where is rule of law?

Amazing! Its truly amazing paragraph, I have got much cleazr idea about from tthis article.

Name (required)Email (required, will not be published)Website (optional)

Message

2000

Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.