Advertising

> > I think keyframe should work like dropamount, that is randomly.
> >
> > a non random droping could be added, maybe by the user specifying in
> > a list what to drop.
> > That would be more powerfull and flexible but probably not much harder
>
> Something like this?
>
> noise=keyframes=1,3,5,7
>
> in order to drop the 1st, 3rd, 5th and 7th keyframes?
yes something like this
>
> > also keeping keyframes and dropamount behave the same
> > is more consistent
> >
>
> Do you mean more consistent with respect to the 'amount' param of added noise,
> as opposed to the patch's behavior of skipping noise if the 'keyframes' param
> is
> present?
both.
i meant the param but as you mention the skiping, that doesnt seem expected by a
user either so it likely would be confusing.
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
It is dangerous to be right in matters on which the established authorities
are wrong. -- Voltaire