A blog by Alistair Barbour-Nationalist party's do not hold any of the answers that modern day Britain is facing. Nationalism,religion, multiculturalism, Right/left wing ideologies are tearing this country apart. If new to this blog please go to my first post/introduction for backgrounder. This blog is now closed. Contact me at alistairbarbour@live.co.uk

Wednesday, 16 October 2013

Just watched Stephen Fry’s “out there”

For anyone who’s not familiar with it, this new series sees Mr Fry travelling the world trying to understand why so many people are threatened
by two people of the same sex being together. In the programme he addresses the
question. ‘Why are so many people obsessed about the biology of homosexual love
making?’They seem to take it as a personal affront. Two people
engaging in a sexual act that does not comply with their own view of sex.

We've all heard and met the odd homophobic nutter, but it was
only in the BNP that I saw it on a regular basis.Griffin, Jefferson, in fact-all of the hierarchy. They’re obsessed with it. Too hear them talk it’s as if two guys had come up to them raped
them or made them watch. Some of them with even the mention of homosexuality
would spin out of control and start emitting such sounds of disgust; it really
has to be seen to be believed.

There was one openly gay guy in the BNP. The leadership
just used this guy as a token “look were not homophobic we have a one in our
ranks” but behind his back it was ‘puff this’ or ‘faggot that’.And’ as usual the BNP have a conspiracy for everything; even
homosexuality.They don’t just say we don’t agree with homosexuals.
There has to be a far darker reason why they deplore them so much.

….”The Marxists are behind it. They are trying to destroy
the family by turning everyone gay”.

“They are purposely putting chemicals in our food to turn
us all into raving queens”.And the best one.‘They are doing this only to white people in an effort to
stop us 'whities' breeding and therefore die out!. Even David Icke doesn't think
his lizard men are that bad !To these idiots-Civil-partnerships, gay marriage,
adoption by a gay couples, gay pride. All of these are used to neuter the white
male and let them damned dark skinned people out number us. Then when they do 'god help us' they will be coming for us!You really couldn't make this shit up

To nationalists ‘as usual’ the biggest culprits are the
teachers. They are promoting homosexuality to help this pre-fertilisation
genocide of ‘our race’. I kid you not.

They can’t see that no one is promoting same sex.
Teachers are just promoting tolerance. There not telling kids ‘hey. be gay, it’s
great’ they are just telling kids there’s nothing wrong with being gay. Huge
difference.

Russia, Uganda, most Muslim countries and nationalists
are all terrified of homosexuals.I agree with the theory that when a man exhibits such
fierce homo phobic vitriol it’s because he’s so damned scared of his own
feelings and thoughts he has to be the one who shouts the loudest in
condemnation.

It’s embarrassing how thousands of men get so angry about this
subject. What are they afraid of? This same
theory argues that these very same men may join such sub-cultures as football
or motorcycle gangs, indulge in violence and lots and lots [far too much] of
male bonding?Perhaps most would be happier to just come out.

A very senior official [before he joined the party] was
known to have enjoyed [how shall we say] adult parties. At these parties it was
[again, how do I put this] ……acceptable practice to grab hold of the next
person to you [male or female] and ………….enjoy yourself!Apparently this is common knowledge in the area where he
lives.

This very same official constantly talks about gays ‘a
lot’ and says such things as “I don’t give a shit what gays do but they should
keep it to themselves, it’s not bloody natural”Well as far as I know, they do keep it to themselves…unless
of course you buy the DVDs Mr official.And hey, if parties like that float your boat good luck
to you, enjoy yourself; but don’t be a hypocrite.

So Griffin, Putin and all the other homophobic
politicians, Muslim leaders and African Christians; come out of the closet and
enjoy life.My apologies to
the gay community. You maybe don’t want these sexually inadequate men anyways.

As usual regular readers of this blog will know that I’m
no fan of so called antifascist organisations either. Where are they when
homophobic Imams and ‘dark’ skinned world leaders are espousing irrational hatred
against homosexuals?

Ahh well there’s the rub.They only ever attack white bigots; white Christian
bigots.As usual they are terrified [on the whole] to attack the
large homophobic bigots that Islam is absolutely full of. Or the many African leaders who are trying to take their countries backwards.But then again we can’t expect any more from this bunch
of post-modern cultural apologist cowards that call themselves anti-fascists or anti-racists!

Wednesday, 9 October 2013

Yesterday while everyone was watching Robinson,
Carroll and Quilliam. I was watching Nick Griffin.

Several times I have stated that Griffin is insanely jealous
of the EDL. He craves to be that kind of figure head, leading an army of 'angry
white men'.

Since the EDL formed he has bounced back and forward from
ridiculing them and calling them 'Zionist puppets' to holding out the olive
branch in the hope of a merger.

It costs nothing to be a member of the EDL; there is no
membership. Thousands of angry men 'thinking' they are taking affirmative
action against radical Islam and paying nobody for the privilege. Griffin has
been spitting feathers since their inception and all the money he could have
made.

I've already said that Griffin will emulate the EDL next
year. At the moment he is an MEP. This will come to an end next June. With the
office of MEP and being a political party he has to operate within legal, moral
and ethical parameters. Next year he will no longer have this restriction. He
has realised that as politics go he and his fringe party are finished.

Bring on phase 2.Back to the days of street protests.

When he first started out he was National front. He was
actually largely responsible for taking the protesters of the streets and getting
them involved in politics.

He thought he could gain power and influence that way.
That's all been for nothing. His party is virtually gone.

I think he will go back to the old days of marching and
trying to provoke this race war he spends hours dreaming off.

He genuinely believes that this war is coming and he will
carried aloft by the downtrodden 'white people of Britain' to save them in
their hour of need. Lunatic!

He has tried to organise some street demos but they have
been quite pathetic in their numbers. Like-minded People have had the EDL to
march behind and he's ended up being stood on the sidelines, watching, fuming
and thinking what may have been.

Even after the evil murder of Lee Rigby, Griffin couldn't
summon up more than a few people. He tried to get people up for a march [with
him at the front of a motorcade saluting and waving to his legion of admirers]
but to no avail. A couple of dozen acolytes ended up showing up as he laid a
wreath.

In comparison the EDL had mass protests all over Britain!

So will the EDL stay as it is or will it fracture into
regional units? I think Griffin would prefer it broke up. He has already forged
alliances with such EDL factions as the 'North West infidels' and the 'English
volunteer Force'. He will be hoping to do the same again with any newly formed
extremist groups.

If the EDL does remain as a national protest group he will
desperately try to forge alliances with the new leadership. Of course this all
depends who and if, anyone takes over?

Ironically the one thing that stopped Griffin and Co getting
their dirty hands on the EDL was Robinson and Carroll. They would have nothing
to do with him. Well now they have gone and just watch this space.

Tommy Robinson and Kevin Carroll have left the EDL. SO’ what
now?

I’m not privy to any information about the whys and
wherefore about how this happened [despite the timing of my post on Monday;
purely coincidental] but all I can say is ‘if they are genuine’ good luck to
them. They are working with the forward thinking ‘Quilliam foundation’ that
will mentor and guide them on another path. After all who better to guide someone away
from an extremist organisation than someone who were once themselves members of
extremist organisations?

I watched Robinson on ‘Newsnight’ and thought he came
over well. But’ I didn't like what he said about halting Muslim immigration.
That’s the last thing we should be doing. We need to continue welcoming refugees
and asylum seekers from anywhere, but we must insist that they leave their
cultural baggage where they fled from.By this I mean archaic customs such as Sharia law, Forced
marriages, FGM and other such Stone Age practices, that we in the west 'should' find abhorrent.We need to get past culture. It’s about acting as 21st
century human beings. The only question immigrants need to answer.Do you want to live in a secular, free, equal and modern
society?

So now it all depends what Tommy Robinson’s politics are
as in how he casts of his past?If he joined Labour his past would be forgiven overnight.
EX BNP and NF members appear to have become extremely clean by supporting them? They can even write books about the violence they participated in
towards black and Asian people. But because they have adopted and embraced the post-modern
cultural apologist mantra of unrestricted multiculturalism
they are clean.The left never expose ex far-right people in the ranks of
Labour, but will use them joining another party to attack it. After all Anti-fascist
organisations are strongly linked to the unions and the Labour party. That’s a fact.

Whilst in the BNP I saw how these organisations worked.
They undoubtedly do parties like the BNP harm but first and foremost they are
political. I've already mentioned that the Tories and liberals treat me [on the
whole] well. The bile and hate that comes from Labour and their political
partners has to be seen to be believed.I still get some now just walking down the street by some
antifascist Muppet who doesn't know I quit, and I’m only know in my town. Robinson
and Carroll have national recognition.

The antifascists leaflet on behalf of the unions and Labour.
After all, its Labour votes that the BNP was taking, because it was the working
classes that had been let down by Labour. None of the other parties ever put
third part leaflets out against the BNP. They tended to take on the BNP
directly. The way it should be done.

The antifascists need an enemy. It was mentioned in the
Quilliam press conference that Robinson may be setting up a new political
party. If he is a threat to Labour votes he will find himself back under the antifascists radar, and if he even mentions immigration or any questions to do with Islam, again he will find himself back in the spotlight as a fascist.

There is nothing wrong with having these conversations
but we are, and need to be very cautious about who is having them and why? That is not a veiled word of caution about Robinson. That
should apply to anyone. It’s not about the conversations and questions we
should be having. It’s about the agenda
behind them.

Also’ Just a word on Griffin! I mentioned in the previous post
that Griffin loses his seat next year. No more money, very few members. I said he would move more to the EDL strategy of street
protests. Well I think he may have been forced to move his grand plan forward
after Tommie’s resignation. He is falling over himself on all social media to
get as many EDL over to him as possible. Some will no doubt go over to the BNP. But many will go
the same way as the BNP when it fractured a few years ago. Lots of little
wannabes setting up different groups, fighting each other for supremacy.

Monday, 7 October 2013

I know I said in a previous post that I would no longer
be following the far right to see what they are up to; and I stand by that. I've
stopped trawling the BNP sites for stories, as there just isn't any. Add to this
the fact that they are virtually finished as a political entity. But’ this is just a generalisation and not a direct
observation relating to one specific event.

The EDL pose a greater
threat to social cohesion than the BNP.

The BNP has a leader, it has a chairman. As inept and
useless as he is he has to try and play the PR game. They are a political party
and have to operate within certain legal parameters. Although the party is full
of racists and Nazis he has to keep them hidden; or at least try. He knows fine well that if a long steady stream of
pictures with shaven headed jackbooted thugs, giving dodgy skyward salutes and
sporting strange tattoos; his voter base will go down even further [which is
getting hard to comprehend as it’s virtually disappeared]

At the moment Griffin holds an office as MEP, which is almost
certain to evaporate at next year’s elections. I think when this happens he will
attempt to emulate the EDL and try to build a street movement similar to what they have. He is insanely jealous of their support. Even though their's has diminished, it still remains far
larger than the BNPs.

But for the moment he has to play the politics game. They
cannot be seen to be stirring up racial tensions too much.

To use the BNP name you have to be a member, with this
comes rules. So on the whole activity throughout the BNP is relatively uniform.
If an ex-member or an outsider attempts to use the brand name BNP they will be
sued.

Griffin owns brand BNP!

In the opposing corner we have the EDL. Stephen Lennon is not a leader; he’s more of a figure
head, a spokesperson. There is no membership. No enforceable code of conduct
and no fear of being kicked out or indeed sued for using the name EDL.

So unlike the BNP the EDL comprises of self-governing autonomous
groups. These could be groups consisting of genuine people who have a valid and
genuine concern regarding political and radical Islam. Or they could be groups
consisting of Nazi thugs or racist bigots. Who have seen this street movement as
a good excuse to blame Muslims and indeed all foreigners for all Britain’s
ills?

There are so many factions now it’s hard to keep track.

So’ when a large protest is organised with divisions
coming from all over the country it’s not surprising that there’s trouble. Many
times EDL factions fight among themselves, and I understand that Lennon
himself has attacked Nazis within the ranks. Throw into the mix the equally odious
UAF and it’s a question of lighting the taper and run like hell.

So do even the decent members [and there are bound to be
some] of the EDL make the whole Islam question worse.

Yes’ there is no doubt they do.

If you live in a Muslim community [mind you there should
be no Muslim communities; just communities] and you see hundreds of white males
marching and chanting often fueled with alcohol what are you going to do?

You’re not going to take a step back and think ‘hold on
do these guys have a point’ no you will be pushed farther into your community.Where the the radical preachers can then go to work on you. As you do this the wider community feels even more
threatened and round and round it goes.

In my opinion if the EDL founders really want to make a
difference and fight political Islam. Put down your beer and your flags,
disband the EDL and take another course of action. I’m pretty sure someone with
such a high profile as Stephen Lennon would perhaps be taken a bit more
seriously if he did this.

It would also go a long way into defusing tensions
in neighborhoods as well. And it would allow the police to put
more time and effort into tackling Islamist terror cells.Take one extremist group off the streets, save the tax
payers money and also take away some of the victim status the Islamists crave.

There are many legitimate groups taking on radical Islam and winning. Support these and really help make a difference!

Saturday, 5 October 2013

I wrote this a few weeks ago and seeing as how Mehdi Hasan has declared
war on the daily mail, and they in return, on him; I thought this would be as
good a time as any to put on my blog.

There is a mind-set that you have to be in one political
camp or another. You have to be right or left wing. Most people are neither but
in many cases the politicians, policy makers and people who have real influence
on society are. Quite often the worst offenders are the political activists
both online and in the real world.

If your right wing you have to have a go at ‘liberal
democracy and ‘woolly minded liberals’ [Their words, not mine]

If your left wing you have to arrogantly look down your
nose at anyone that doesn't believe in a bloated state and public sector.

This mind-set even tries to dictate which newspapers you
should read.

If your right wing you have to despise the guardian and
dismiss everything that’s in it as PC, Britain hating, claptrap, and that these
people can’t get out of bed in the morning because of a lack of a backbone.

Likewise if your left wing you have to sneer constantly
at anyone that reads the daily mail. Dismissing them all as nutters, racists
and closet Nazis!

Well here’s a question. What if you read both papers
online [and many others]several times a week [I wouldn't buy them because I don’t want to help
them peddle some of their rubbish, plus I quite often have to Google a DM story to see
if its true, recent or even relevant]

So does what I read make me a lefty, pc, woolly liberal, Britain
hating, patriotic Nazi, racist, bigot?

Wow what would one
of them look like?

For some reason to be a ‘socially conscious nice human being’
you have to attack papers such as the DM as often as possible. If you don’t
well obviously you’re a right wing nut-job.

Similarly the Guardian; according to the right wing ‘Is read
by lentil eating, humus smelling goat breeders who drive Citroen 2CVs and live
in their own hair’.

So ‘my argument is this. How on earth can you get a
realistic perspective on life if your information comes from one socio-political
base?

No newspaper is totally bad. If you only ever read the
daily mail ‘god help you’.

It must be hard to get out of your bed in the morning
because of all the Muslim terrorists, African rapists and Romanian muggers hiding
behind your bins. That’s assuming you have a bin because of all the unemployed
scroungers and refugee’s that may have stolen it!

Likewise’ If you read nothing but the Guardian. Again ‘god help you’. You must believe that Britain
is responsible for all the worlds’ ills and terrorists are just misunderstood
freedom fighters and there’s a government conspiracy behind everything.

Sometimes the very reason a newspaper runs a story is to
prop up its political bias. But if the story is true it doesn't matter who
publishes it. It’s still true.