Ancient mutant Jamaican sea cows?

This week we feature some encouraging feedback from Leaton Jay of New South Wales,
Australia, who also asks a question about alleged legs on fossil Jamaican sea cows.
Sea cows are also known as manatees, dugongs or sirenians. Andrew Lamb replies.

First let me say how much I appreciate your website, and I ask God to bless you
all and your works daily. I first came to Christ in 1993 after 60 years of militant
atheism, but my uncritical acceptance of evolutionary theory was a sticking point
until I came across your website. May God bless you all!

my uncritical acceptance of evolutionary theory was a sticking point until I came
across your website

Recently I was browsing the Talkorigins.org website, in particular an article by
Douglas Theobald PHD, entitled “29 + Evidences For Macroevolution”,
in which he writes of a fossil found in Jamaica recently, which is claimed to be
a transition from a four legged land mammal to a sea cow. If this claim were true
it would be a stunning example of a transitional form indeed, for an accompanying
photograph of the almost complete fossil shows an (obviously) terrestrial creature
about two metres long with four legs and a long thin tail. No doubts about that.
As Dr Theobald quotes the definition of Sirenia as being aquatic mammals with foreflippers,
a tail flipper and no hindquarters, and as this is none of these, there must be
some other reason why this fossil has been classified as “Pezosiren Portelli”,
but I am not qualified or experienced to see why, and Dr. Theobald does not elaborate,
except to call it “a sea cow with legs”. The shape of the head of living
sea cows is very distinctive, looking almost human. So is it the fossil’s
skull? I cannot tell.

I have searched your website for a treatment on this fossil, but have found nothing,
so I would very much appreciate your comments.

Thank you, and please keep up the good work.

Leaton Jay

Dear Leaton

First let me say how much I appreciate your website, and I ask God to bless you
all and your works daily.

Thanks so much for your encouraging words of support. There is a lot of work involved
in producing daily articles for our website, and it is very gratifying to hear it
has blessed people like yourself.

We encourage supporters to help by sharing links to CMI articles with friends and
on internet forums. This generates a higher search engine ranking and therefore
more people will find our articles, and hence there will be more feedback (and hence
more articles ).

I first came to Christ in 1993 after 60 years of militant atheism, but my uncritical
acceptance of evolutionary theory was a sticking point until I came across your
website. May God bless you all!

Photo wikipedia

A sea cow and calf.

We can appreciate how evolution was a stumbling block to your faith. The role of evolution
in hindering faith is well understood by creation evangelists, but sadly is still
denied by many in the church—see
Facing the issue. Let’s hope that church leaders who think it is not
an issue will read of your experience to the contrary.

Recently I was browsing the Talkorigins website

To browse Talkorigins material safely requires a high level of discernment because
the site contains a very high level of falsehood. For one example, see
Evolution by fiat and faith. Worse, it often contains correct facts that
are presented in such a way as to deliberately mislead—for an example see
Human tails and fairy tales.
Their false claims are presented with a scholarly air of authority that can easily
seduce the unwary, and the information they present is often difficult to double-check
as to its accuracy.

in particular an article by Douglas Theobald PHD, entitled “29 + Evidences
For Macroevolution”, in which he writes of a fossil found in Jamaica recently,
which is claimed to be a transition from a four legged land mammal to a sea cow.

Mosaic creatures

Animals that combine features typical of different classes of organism are referred
to as mosaics. The platypus and Archaeopteryx are two classic examples of mosaic creatures.

CMI have published articles on several aquatic creatures that could qualify as mosaic. One example is Acanthostega. Some evolutionists have touted it as a fish-to-amphibian transitional form, but experts regard Acanthostega as a mosaic, and quotes to this effect
can be found in the section ‘No! A mosaic tetrapod’
in our article Yet another missing link fails to qualify!

It is probable that if more data about Livoniana becomes available, scientists
will either conclude that it was definitely a fish or definitely a tetrapod. Even
if it does turn out to be a ‘mosaic’ creature like the platypus,
which contains features which are typical of various different classes of animals
but which are not usually found together in one organism, this does not indicate
evolution. … Creation
is a valid, and far more logical and reasonable, explanation for such creatures.

This Jamaican ‘legged sea cow’ claim was made in 2001 in the journal
Nature by a paleontologist named Daryl Domning, based on some bones he
found 15 km from Montego Bay.1
National Geographic News also promoted Domning’s claim.2 Both Nature and National Geographic
are notorious for their hostility to creation and their promotion of evolutionary
frauds and myths. For example National Geographic foisted the Archaeoraptor hoax upon the world, and Nature is forever
announcing new transitional forms (recent examples include Gogonasus and
Gigantoraptor), none of which hold up under critical scrutiny.
By the way, the Theobald ‘Macroevolution’ article is an example of the
informal fallacy of ‘elephant hurling’, where someone presents a seemingly
long list of evidences, without proper evaluation of each one, in the hope that
the reader will be ‘snowed’ and not bother to check each one for validity.

If this claim were true it would be a stunning example of a transitional form indeed,

Actually, no. If an animal truly existed that had a sea cow head and chest but had
the legs of a land animal instead of flippers, it would be an example of a mosaic
creature (see box).

If an animal truly existed that looked like a sea cow but had legs instead of flippers,
it would be an example of a mosaic creature

Yes, a transitional form (whether from quadruped to sea cow, ape to man, or any
kind of organism into a different kind) would indeed be stunning. However, no indisputable
example of a transitional form has ever been established (as
even one leading evolutionist admitted). There are always a few dubious
claims current in the evolutionary literature, but each ‘transitional’
claim is inevitably discarded as more information about the creature comes to light
(and as newer, not-yet-discredited examples became available to replace them!)
In fact, we know from the Bible (backed up by the well-established laws of
chemistry, information,
probability and
thermodynamics) that such transitions, from one kind of creature
into a new kind that did not exist before, are impossible.

for an accompanying photograph of the almost complete fossil shows an (obviously)
terrestrial creature about two metres long with four legs and a long thin tail.
No doubts about that.

The bones pulled together by Daryl Domning to construct what he named Pezosiren
portelli came from five separate bone beds within the five-metre
thick Guys Hill Member stratum of rock in Jamaica. (Note, in evolutionary thinking,
those five metres would represent several million years worth of accumulated sediments.)
Some of the bones were found by themselves and some as partial skeletons. The stratum
in question has yielded many hundreds of bones, including those of a rhinoceros
(Hyrachyrus),3
a lizard,4 a crocodile (Charactosuchus
kugleri),5 a turtle,5
sea cows (‘abundant remains of sirenians’1 ), and possibly
a primate,6 along with lots
of invertebrate marine fossils (mollusks, etc.).7

According to the Nature paper, some of the bones Domning used (the skull
and ribs) have features typical of sea-cow bones8,
while others (the vertebrae, pelvis, and limb bones) have features typical of hoofed
land animals.9 It seems
quite likely to me that in constructing his ‘legged sea-cow’, Domning
combined bones from different kinds of creature. Remember that bones of both land
animals and ordinary sea cows have been found in the Guys Hill Member bone beds.
Evolutionary paleontologists like Domning would do well to heed the old saying ‘When
you hear hoofbeats in the night, think horses, not unicorns’ and apply it
to their reconstructions, i.e. when you find sea cow and quadruped bones, think sea cows and quadrupeds, not mystery new organisms. This scientific principle is formally known as
Occam’s razor.

Photo Nature

Some of the bones.

Photo Nature

The ‘legged sea cow’ skeleton Domning constructed.

Domning neglected to include in his Nature paper photos of most of the
bones, including the skull or skull fragments (excepting part of the right jaw).
Here is the single photo of bones that appears in his paper, plus the constructed
skeleton. I say ‘constructed’ instead of ‘reconstructed’
because reconstruction would imply previous existence, whereas this
incongruous combination of bones is probably purely the product of Domning’s artistic
talents, rather than the remains of a true species that once lived.

As Dr Theobald quotes the definition of Sirenia as being aquatic mammals with foreflippers,
a tail flipper and no hindquarters, and as this is none of these, there must be
some other reason why this fossil has been classified as “Pezosiren Portelli”,
but I am not qualified or experienced to see why, and Dr. Theobald does not elaborate,
except to call it “a sea cow with legs”. The shape of the head of living
sea cows is very distinctive, looking almost human. So is it the fossil’s
skull? I cannot tell.

Yes, sea cow skulls and ribs have some distinctive features. The desire for the
glory and prestige that comes with ‘discovering’ a new transitional
form was possibly a motivating factor when Domning undertook to combine scattered
sea cow and quadruped bones to concoct his legged sea cow. Another powerful factor
motivating some scientists to build ‘golden calves’ of this sort is
the need for evidence to support their belief in evolution.

Tellingly, the putative legged Jamaican sea cow has not become a showcase evidence
featured in school textbooks and trumpeted in the media. Rather, it has been quietly
forgotten by sober academia, and is hardly mentioned outside of extremist evolutionist
sites like TalkOrigins. This lack of support is a good indication that, even in
the opinion of the pro-evolution academic establishment, this ‘mutant’
Jamaican sea cow doesn’t have an academic leg to stand on.

I have searched your website for a treatment on this fossil, but have found nothing,
so I would very much appreciate your comments.

Composite image

Another transitional form in Jamaica?

Hopefully this article will serve to rectify that lack for future Jamaican sea cow
seekers.

Thank you, and please keep up the good work.

Leaton Jay

And thank you again Leaton, for your encouraging feedback, and interesting enquiry.

Recommended Resources

Sixteen spectacular sea giants, including the best candidate for Leviathan, feature
in this stunningly illustrated book. Mighty predators like Liopleurodon, and the
lesser-known sea serpent Styxosaurus probably inspired tales of sea dragons before
they became extinct; the whale-wrestling colossal squid was thought to be mythical
until its recent live discovery. Fantastic creatures and fascinating facts impart
a thoroughly biblical worldview. Hardcover. 80 pages.

Ref. 1. ‘The skull is of clearly sirenian form’;
‘The ribs are swollen (pachyostotic) and composed wholly of dense bone (osteosclerotic),
as in other sirenians’. Return to text.

Ref. 1. ‘The axis and other corvical vertebrae grossly
resemble those of Palaeocene condylarths such as Ectoconus’; ‘The pelvis
… is long and narrow … resembling those of primitive land mammals’;
‘The tibia … greatly resembles those of Ectoconus or other primitive
ungulates’; ‘These bones [foot bones] are short and flattened like those
of terrestrial ungulates, and show no signs of paddle-like elongation’. Return to text.

Published: 7 June 2008(GMT+10)

Refuting Evolution has sold over 500,000 copies! Impressive? But Richard Dawkins’ God Delusion has sold 8.5 million copies. Please support CMI so we can get more of this information out. Support this site