Of course, if a lot of people would rather the site was always full-screen width, we can change it!

M

Yeah, count me in as well, I had to check the forum first as there was an update to Iceweasel/Firefox yesterday when I ran my updating script - I wondered if it was something to do with that - obviously not.

Surely the "fill the screen" option is better ? Mike as it allows people to view the screen as their hardware/settings dictate ????

In my case, a 21 inch CRT set to 1600x1200 (anything less makes pages render huge and rather clumsy looking).

I say that's not cricket I can't find extra-lite either mind you I didn't change themes so I still have extra-lite when I'm logged in so it is only something that can be turned on and off in the phpbb stuff

OK, I've temporarily re-enabled the ExtraLite theme, so that those who tested the new one can switch back. But in a few days I'll remove it from the theme-switch list. It's not about wanting to force a certain theme on people -- it's about keeping things as simple as possible, so that when I add a new feature to the site, I don't have to implement it in two different theme engines!

Rhakios wrote:Err, why would I go searching for screenshots of Red Hat?

To contrast with the MikeOS GUI? On that subject, I think I'll have to scrap that work. I've written widget routines, a complete font rendering system and loads of supporting stuff, but it's just getting too messy. Maybe the code should remain simple, clean and small. Oh, decisions decisions...

Site is looking good but I'd remove the "margin-top" across all browsers. The 10 or so pixels would look much better if the black from the LXF banner was up against the top of the browser edge. IMHO, of course.

On that subject, I think I'll have to scrap that work. I've written widget routines, a complete font rendering system and loads of supporting stuff, but it's just getting too messy. Maybe the code should remain simple, clean and small. Oh, decisions decisions...

M

I'm amazed there have been no sarky comments from the LXF regulars about "simple, clean and small" and so I won't be the first Whatever the result of your decisions, VMWare Workstation is waiting to run the code