This just in: cameras rely on mass electrical infrastructure. Disrupting it is disrupting people's subservient social relationship to the State. This may provoke a reactionary response from the consumer-slaves, BUT how is this worse to unarmed protesters on foot being rammed by a brute in a car?

Have fun taking down the low-hanging fruits that cameras SO poetically are, or even using an army of drones to take them down every week... The effort is laudable and sends an interesting signal of resistance for a brief period to the people around, but will it change much in the social relationship in your area?

The vague outline in my head is after the 2008 revolt, things peaked (insurrecto-wise) with the burning of that bank with the people they didn't know were trapped inside. After that it was more big tent, anti-austerity stuff from the financial crisis. These days, my impression is that it's urban projects, like refugee assistance, squats, gardens, mesh nets, etc.. But I have no bearing for how common this sort of targeted vandalism still is. Graffiti still plasters all the walls from what I've seen, but that's not the same thing.