To many of us with MS, it seems glaringly obvious that diet is a probable cause of
MS. Yet it has been widely ignored. We all know about the geographical distribution
of MS: High where they eat a lot of dairy produce, saturated fat, and grains; low
where they eat a lot of fish.

On top of this, there is overwhelming anecdotal evidence about diet and MS. Many,
like me, who radically change their diet see results. * Your condition gradually
improves. Many doctors have seen this for themselves.

So why don't the medical profession take it seriously?

"There is no doubt that clinical trials with diet are needed," states Professor Christine
Williams at the Nutrition Unit at the University of Reading."There is sufficient
indication that diet could be an effective modulator for this disease."

So what's the problem?

Prof. D. A. Ledward, Head of the Department of Food & Science Technology at the University
of Reading comes up with this : "We accept that diet plays a crucial role in many
illnesses. But because of our biochemical individuality and the number of variables
there are in MS, trials to confirm most of these relationships make them very expensive
to prove to any degree of acceptable significance."

So money, it seems, lies at the root of the problem. You can't make a bundle of cash
or a nice tidy profit from proving that people with MS can get better by changing
their diet. Though heart disease seems to manage alright.

"I'm afraid the power of the drug companies has distracted many MS researchers away
from diet and other non-drug issues," says Professor Charles Warlow, a neuroscientist
at the University of Edinburgh. " It is much easier for a researcher to do a drug
trial sponsored by a pharmaceutical company, than raise funds to do a serious trial
of dietary interventions."

"This is not to blame the industry," Professor Warlow continues. " They are doing
what they have to do in a competitive market. The problem lies with government which
is not prepared to redress the balance and fund research into interventions of no
commercial interest."

Ah. Commercial interest

It seems ironic that our drive for diet to be taken seriously comes at a time when
one of the most extensively-researched and expensive drugs for MS, beta interferon,
is deemed "not sufficiently cost-effective" by the National Institute for Clinical
Excellence to be widely prescribed for MS patients on the NHS.

I agree with Professor Warlow when he adds: "Patients themselves, and the MS Society,
have become obsessed with beta interferon, even though any effect is marginal at
best."

So wouldn't it be better to fund diet trials which could result in cost-effective
treatment for more people?" They are trying to do just that in Canada - if they can
raise the money. But even if they did it there, we would still have to do the same
here too.

Our Campaign

So what else can we do? For a start, GPs could give information to their MS patients
about diet. If patients ask: "Does diet play a role in MS", doctors shouldn't shilly-shally
around. They should say yes. Saying 'we don't know' is no longer good enough. We
do know.

How can you help?

We can also raise awareness, and lobby people who have power and influence. This
is what we can do:

4) Write to Jeremy Hunt MP, Secretary of State for Health and Norman Lamb MP Minister
of State for Care and Support at the Dept of Health, Richmond House, 79 Whitehall,
London SW1A 2NS, UK

Remember to

Suggest diet as a realistic alternative to beta-interferon and highlight the urgent
need to secure funding research trials on diet, it's our best hope of a major breakthrough
in understanding MS and for getting a proven, effective, and cheap treatment in the
near future.