Dave Martin writes:
> On Friday 17 Dec 2004 22:27, David Megginson wrote:
>
> > Totally up to you, but my 172P POH is for the 1981 model
>
> However, I also discovered that the early 172s had more dihedral and a
> slightly different shape to the aerofoil. Comparing this the FG 172P, which
> has little dihedral. It looks like 'our' one is a fairly-late 172P.
>