24 August 2012

Lenin’s “The State and Revolution”
is a classic of classics. Not only is it an original work in itself, but it
also revisits a string of other major Marxist classics. We will take Chapters Two and Three of
this, Lenin’s most extraordinary work, as our main text (download linked
below).

“The State and Revolution” was written after April and
before October, 1917, between two revolutions and in a time of furious class
struggle, during which Lenin was in hiding for part of the time. The book
certainly shows what was on Lenin’s mind in between the two Russian revolutions
of 1917.

In the first line of Chapter 2 of “The State and Revolution”
Lenin describes “The Poverty of Philosophy”,
written in 1847 when Marx was still in his twenties, as “the first mature works
of Marxism,” - or in other words, as a classic.

Lenin moves on to the classic Communist Manifesto,
where he immediately derives the term “dictatorship of the proletariat” from
the equally direct words of Marx and Engels in the Manifesto, namely: “the
state, i.e. the proletariat organised as the ruling class”.

“The state is a special organization of force: it is an
organization of violence for the suppression of some class.” In other
words, the proletariat will use the state to suppress the bourgeois class.

Lenin then turns on the reformists. In the first paragraph
of the third part of Chapter 3, Lenin calls the anarchists and the
petty-bourgeois opportunists “twin brothers” (“anarcho-syndicalism… is merely the twin brother of opportunism”).
At this point in Chapter 2 he writes:

“The petty-bourgeois democrats, those sham socialists who
replaced the class struggle by dreams of class harmony, even pictured the
socialist transformation in a dreamy fashion — not as the overthrow of the rule
of the exploiting class, but as the peaceful submission of the minority to the
majority which has become aware of its aims. This petty-bourgeois utopia, which
is inseparable from the idea of the state being above classes, led in practice
to the betrayal of the interests of the working classes.”

Chapter 2 proceeds to touch “The Eighteenth
Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte”. It returns to Marx on the dictatorship of
the proletariat, this time in those very words, in a letter written in 1852;
and Lenin says: “Only he is a
Marxist who extends the recognition of the class struggle to the recognition of
the dictatorship of the proletariat.”

Marx’s classic work “The Civil War in France”
was written during, and immediately after, the events of early 1871
in Paris. Lenin’s summary of Marx, as usual, is brief. It misses very
little and cannot easily be beaten. We will note its highlights here.

The first is where Lenin notes that Marx would have made a
correction to the Communist Manifesto of
1848 on the basis of the experience of the Paris Commune. In 1871 Marx
wrote: “…the working class cannot simply lay hold of the ready-made
state machinery and wield it for its own purposes” - by which he meant
that proletariat had to "to smash the bureaucratic-military
machine" and to replace it with a state that is "the
proletariat organized as the ruling class" and as an "armed
people" that had disbanded the bourgeoisie's "special bodies of armed men".

October 1917

Lenin wrote: “Marx did not indulge in utopias; he
expected the experience of the mass movement to provide the reply to the
question as to the specific forms this organisation of the proletariat as the
ruling class would assume and as to the exact manner in which this organisation
would be combined with the most complete, most consistent ‘winning of the
battle of democracy.’"

The Commune was “a practical step that was more
important than hundreds of programmes and arguments.” Lenin proceeds in the
second and third sections of this chapter to relate how the practical steps
were executed.

In the fourth part, Lenin addresses the question of
centralism, and clearly shows that centralism is not imposed but must be won
politically, as a matter of free-willing action. All the time, Lenin is
carrying on a secondary argument against the “opportunists” and the
“anarchists”, whom, as we noted, he says are “twin brothers.” Lenin writes:

“The anarchists dismissed the question of political forms
altogether. The opportunists of present-day Social-Democracy accepted the
bourgeois political forms of the parliamentary democratic state as the limit
which should not be overstepped; they battered their foreheads praying before
this 'model', and denounced as anarchism every desire to break these forms.”

“…now one has to engage in excavations, as it were, in
order to bring undistorted Marxism to the knowledge of the mass of the people,” says
Lenin.

As it was in 1917, so it remains in 2010. One has to engage
in excavations.