GoodFellas: Married to the Mob

IN A WORLD THAT POWERED BY VIOLENCE, ON THE STREETS WHERE THE VIOLENT HAVE POWER, A NEW GENERATION CARRIES ON AN OLD TRADITION.

Making GoodFellas a horribly realistic film took its toll. Joe Pesci had qualms about playing such an evil character as Tommy DeVito and Lorraine Bracco thought of her character as an abused woman in order to grasp how to play her. In the end, director Martin Scorsese was forced to cut several of his bloodiest scenes. But he did achieve that feeling of authenticity, not least by letting the actors research their parts thoroughly and then allow them to ad-lib during rehearsals, writing their best work into the script. It was a difficult shoot, but the end result became one of the director’s finest films.

The story is based on reality and was originally researched by crime reporter Nicholas Pileggi who became interested in the tale of how anFBI informant began his mob career. As a teenager during the 1950s, Henry Hill started running errands in Brooklyn for a local capo called Paul Cicero (Paul Sorvino), eventually getting acquainted with his henchmen, including the clever and careful Jimmy Conway (Robert De Niro) and the violent, psychotic Tommy DeVito (Pesci). In this mob family Henry finds everything he’s been looking for, including respect and money. The life of a gangster is glamorous (except for those times when you’re digging a hole in the middle of nowhere to bury some guy you’ve killed) and Henry loves it. He dates a woman whom he eventually marries, Karen (Bracco), and she’s willing to put up with being the wife of a mobster. As the years go by, Henry and his compadres do time but also make money, not least from a heist atJFK Airport. But their lives slowly deteriorate. A hit on a fellow mobster who was a part of the Gambino family comes back to haunt them and Henry’s new engagement in the world of drugs dooms him and Karen, starting the chain of events that forces Henry to stand up in court and identify his former friends as members of the Mafia.

Clever contrasts between positive and negative
It isn’t a very likeable character that Ray Liotta is playing; even when Henry Hill goes into the FBI Witness Protection Program he can’t help but feel sorry for not being a mobster anymore, in spite of all the horrible things he’s done. Still, Liotta does a great job of making us interested in this rather unscrupulous character and his career; the film became his breakthrough. The same is true for both Bracco (very strong as Karen who is turned on by the life of crime but still can’t accept the ultimate consequences of being married to Henry) and Pesci who is unbelievably dynamic as Tommy, a temperamental gangster in the style of James Caan’s portrayal of Sonny Corleone in The Godfather (1972). The director knows how to convey the emotions of belonging to a crime family. He shows us how tempting it is for a kid to get involved with these “fun-loving” people; they find a home, a place where bonds are tied and where there’s never a shortage of money. Scorsese cleverly contrasts those positive sides with the negative ones; the violence is shocking and grotesque. It is a long but well paced film, funny and horrifying.

Scorsese was attracted to the movie because of Pileggi’s credible depiction of what life as a gangster looked like. Fans of The Sopranoswill recognize many familiar actors from that show here; both these works of art have been lauded for giving us insight into the warped life of mobsters and how they function. It isn’t pretty… but it is nevertheless eerily absorbing.

Last word: “In a picture like ‘GoodFellas’ where I’ve used mainly pre-recorded music, it’s usually thought of way before hand. Some of the music in ‘GoodFellas’ has been in my head for years. For example the scene where Ray Liotta’s character is drug running and he’s high on cocaine, I used The Who and also music from the film ‘Performance’, to create the vortex of paranoia.” (Scorsese, BBC)

Post navigation

One thought on “GoodFellas: Married to the Mob”

(DVD) GoodFellas is on top of my best films of all time list. I was one of the people who had boguht the previous DVD edition, the infamous two-sided, no features release that had been one of the first generation of DVD releases, before the medium evolved into what it is today. I had been counting the days until they would re-release this film, so I was first in line to get this new edition. Unfortunately, though this edition is much better than the previous one, it very much pales alongside most modern DVD packages. The package aroused many suspicions in me that this was a rush job. Among my dissatisfactions: – There’s no booklet, leaflet, film histories, or printed material of any kind which generally supplements a two-disc release like this; – The film is long, but still under the three-hour mark, and the second disc has three short (eight to 20 minutes), unremarkable documentaries plus a storyboard-film comparison. Wouldn’t all this material have fit on a single disc? Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story had three times the media and was only a single disc. If they didn’t have enough material, why did they put up the illusion that there are two discs’ worth? – There are only two commentaries, and one of them isn’t even complete. The Cop and Crook commentary is interesting, applying the great idea of bringing back Henry Hill (on whose life this film and its source book Wiseguy were based) and the prosecutor who had sponsored his Witness Protection Program, Edward McDonald. It’s not a very illuminating commentary, but it’s still good to see what Hill is like today. However, the Cast and Crew commentary is suspect. Not only does it not cover the entire film, I actually suspect it was not recorded as a commentary, but edited from fragmentary interviews. So rarely do the cast and director on this track comment on the specific scenes, the way a commentary should, that I don’t think they were watching the film as they were speaking; I think the production company simply mixed the sound louder and created the illusion that this was a commentary track. I don’t know for sure if this is the case, but if it is, I consider it very dishonest marketing. Don’t call it a commentary unless it is one! – I found absolutely no new insights into Martin Scorsese or the film from the additional materials. The making of documentary is the usual heap praise upon the director baloney. Come on, do we actually *need* you to tell us that Scorsese is great? How about giving some anecdotes and insight into the film instead? All of the above adds up to a very underwhelming DVD release of a film that’s possibly the greatest American film of the last 20 years. However, there is still one incentive to own it the entire film is contained, without interruptions, on one disc. So unlike with the old DVD release, you can actually watch the whole film now without having to turn the disc over. So this is still the best available version of the film out there. However, I remain displeased. After years of waiting, and being disappointed, why does this edition fail to satisfy? I can only hope that the impossible would happen that Warner Bros. would let The Criterion Collection take a stab at this film, and do it justice. It will never happen, but the very idea does whet the appetite.

The Grades

TV shows, TV movies and miniseries are graded this way:ABOVE AVERAGE
AVERAGE
BELOW AVERAGE

Remember This?

Loading Quotes...

A blog on movies & TV, Hollywood and beyond.

I studied film at Halmstad University and practical filmmaking at the New York Film Academy. Now I'm a critic for the Swedish daily Aftonbladet. Opinions expressed on this personal website are solely mine and not related to Aftonbladet.