The habenula, an epithalamic nucleus, is centrally located within the dorsal diencephalic conduction system. This dorsal pathway connects the limbic forebrain and basal ganglia to midbrain monoaminergic cell groups intricately involved in the control of behavior. In particular, the lateral habenula (LHb) projects to, among other sites, the ventral tegmental area (VTA). Indeed, recent work has revealed direct LHb innervation of VTA dopamine as well as GABA cells. Little is known, however, about the behavioral relevance of this innervation but this knowledge is of potential importance, since the VTA gives rise to the mesolimbic dopamine pathway, a system critically involved in goal-directed behavior. Our aim here was to begin to understand the contribution of the LHb to dopamine-dependent behaviors. To do this, we produced neurotoxic lesions of the LHb and measured amphetamine-enhanced locomotion and intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS), two behaviors highly sensitive to mesolimbic dopamine neurotransmission.
METRIALS AND METHODS: Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetised with isoflurane and mounted onto a stereotaxic apparatus. Ibotenic acid, an excitatory neurotoxin at glutamatergic receptors, was infused bilaterally into the LHb (0.25 μg/0.25 μl/side). Sham-lesioned rats received infusions of 0.9% sterile saline. Rats in the ICSS experiment were additionally implanted with a monopolar stimulation electrode in the posterior mesencephalon. One group of rats was tested for their locomotor response to amphetamine (0, 0.5 or 1 mg/kg, i.p.), ten days after LHb lesion. Locomotion was measured in rectangular activity chambers, each equipped with two parallel infrared photobeams. On test day, rats were weighed, placed in the activity chamber and baseline locomotor activity was measured for 1 hour. Rats then received amphetamine or vehicle (0.9% saline) and locomotor activity was measured for 2 more hours. A separate group of rats was used in the ICSS experiment. Beginning seven days post-lesion, rats were trained to press a lever in order to self-administer trains of stimulation pulses. We then measured response rates at each of a series of pulse frequencies during daily sessions. From these response-frequency curves, we obtained estimates of reward thresholds, defined as the pulse frequency necessary for half-maximal responding. Baseline reward thresholds were matched across all rats and once stable, we tested the reward-enhancing effect of amphetamine, at the same doses tested in the locomotion experiment.
RESULTS: Neurotoxic lesions of the LHb did not alter baseline locomotor activity in either group. Amphetamine enhanced locomotor activity throughout the entire 2 hour test. Importantly, the locomotor stimulant effect of amphetamine (1 mg/kg) was significantly greater in lesioned rats during the first hour, and a similar tendency was observed during the second hour. On the other hand, we did not observe any difference in amphetamine-induced enhancement of reward between lesioned and sham rats, at any dose or any time post-injection.
CONCLUSION: Our findings reveal an important functional contribution of the LHb to dopamine-mediated locomotion. On the other hand, the clear dissociation between the locomotor-stimulant and rewarding effects of amphetamine suggests that the neural substrates mediating these two are dissociable and differentially sensitive to LHb modulation.