Milo Yiannopoulos is now his own lawyer—and the internet is roasting his case

Noted far-right provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos became the laughing stock of the internet after the first draft of his canceled Simon & Schuster book, Dangerous, leaked with some pretty harsh editorial feedback. Now, new documents from the New York County Clerk reveal Yiannopoulos’ lawsuit against the book publisher has taken an interesting turn.

Yiannopoulos has become his own attorney.

Last month, Yiannopoulos was in court officially withdrawing his law firm, Meister Seelig & Fein, from representing him. This turned the far-right figure into his own legal representative in court.

Why dismiss his counsel? Well, Yiannopoulos partly attributes that to a “break-down between me and my representatives.” But he also highlights another reason. Apparently, Simon & Schuster turned over certain documents to Yiannopoulos’ law firm for his counsel to study, but could not be seen by Yiannopoulos himself. This ended up taking precedent throughout the January proceeding, as Yiannopoulos demanded the court give him permission to view the documents.

“There is no reason why I should not be given access to documents that are absolutely essential in order for me to properly assess my own case,” Yiannopoulos told the court.

To which Judge Barry R. Ostrager responded, “That’s not going to happen.”

Ostrager went on to explain that Simon & Schuster gave the documents “on the basis of a good faith representation” that they would not be shared with Yiannopoulos. But the far-right figure pushed onward, arguing that Simon & Schuster was “engaging in gameship with these designations.”

“You are not entitled to secured documents that were explicitly provided with the understanding that they be for attorney’s eyes only,” Ostrager told Yiannopoulos.

“Would the court be willing to offer me some assistance in renegotiating?” Yiannopoulos asked.

“I’m sorry?” the judge replied.

Yiannopoulos wants the documents because he believes Simon & Schuster broke his book’s contract for both political reasons and to “save revenue lines elsewhere in the business.” He’s more than welcome to argue that point, but he cannot receive the documents by simply telling the judge to do so. In the New York Supreme Court, discovery disputes are handled with a letter to the court, followed by a response letter from the opposing party, followed by a conference to discuss the discovery dispute’s merits.

Yiannopoulos either didn’t realize this, or at the very least remembered halfway through that a summary judgment motion is underway, thus wasting the court’s time.

“Whatever,” Yiannopoulos told the court. “You know, we have that summary judgment motion pending. I understand.”

The entire proceeding transcript was later published on Feb. 7, quickly going viral after The Hill’s campaign editor Will Sommer stumbled across the transcript.

Ana Valens is an LGBTQ reporter and essayist for the Daily Dot. Her work has previously appeared in Bitch, the Establishment, Vice's Waypoint, Rolling Stone's Glixel, and the Toast. She lives in Brooklyn, New York.