Crazy American Women Are Getting Crazier

A very homely, urbanely decayed spinster has taken photographs of herself posed with male and child mannequins, presumably as some sort of statement on the present condition of her bifurcated ego.

If you thought 21st Century American women have plumbed the depths of crazy, you’d be wrong. There’s totes crazy left in those desiccated wombs and cock-ravaged holes where their feminine hearts used to reside. Expect to see a plague of crazy visited upon the women of the West, as the modern diversity industrial complex and no-holds-barred sexual market drives the wedge deeper between their mothering and materialistic desires. We have only begun to bear witness to a total meltdown of the American woman’s psyche.

My advice to American men: If you didn’t get lucky and find yourself a sane, feminine American woman before this late-stage twisted empire in rapid decay corrupted her, head overseas. You’ve got to know when to hold an American woman, and know when to fold her. And right now, she’s coming up 2-7 off-suit.

I’ve never felt like I needed to hold on to anyone. If anything, I got bored too quickly and they went crazy trying to hold me down.

Sexy goddesses turn into disgusting chumps when they turn needy. I can only imagine how needy and creepy these disgusting pansy nancies who try to “hold down” girlfriends must appear to their girls. I marvel how they open their legs for them.

Neediness is a huge turn off.

If a relationship feels like work, you’re doing it wrong. OR you’re in the wrong relationship. With the wrong girl. Period.

I know it’s old hat, and I know its just a modification of the theme NAWALT, but the fact is, if you had ever found a woman worth holding on to in your life, you would understand. The fact that you don’t is not your fault, it is the fault of feminism and the decay of our society.

I’m sorry, friend. The truth sucks ass, but you really are missing out on something great.

HEY EHSTRISTTEZ HEARTSISTEZ !! LZOZZOZOZOZO DA GBFM is having a great GBREAT TIME AT DA OLYJPICSZ OLYMP{ICS THIS YEARZ REPRESRESNTING DA DECLINENEING BERNAKAKNKIIFIED USA and i do hope to bring home da GOLDZ LZOZZLZOZOZOOZOZOZOZ in tda CURLING EVENTZ and in da pzuuzzyzyzyuzyzzuzy puzuzuzyysyysysysy eating eventsz too:

“It becomes possible for a Shaw to say “that unless Woman repudiates her womanliness, her duty to her husband, to her children, to society, to the law, and to everyone but herself, she cannot emancipate herself”. The primary woman, the peasant woman, is mother. The whole vocation towards which she has yearned from childhood is included in that one word. But now emerges the Ibsen woman, the comrade, the heroine of a whole megalopolitan literature from Northern drama to Parisian novel. Instead of children, she has soul-conflicts; marriage is a craft-art for the achievement of “mutual understanding.” It is all the same whether the case against children is the American lady’s who would not miss a season for anything, or the Parisienne’s who fears that her lover would leave her, or an Ibsen heroine’s who “belongs to herself” – they all belong to themselves and they are all unfruitful…

At this level all Civilizations enter upon a stage, which lasts for centuries, of appalling depopulation. The whole pyramid of cultural man vanishes. It crumbles from the summit, first the world-cities, then the provincial forms, and finally the land itself, whose best blood has incontinently poured into the towns, merely to bolster them up awhile. At the last, only the primitive blood remains, alive, but robbed of its strongest and most promising elements. This residue is the Fellah type.”

I encouraged one married Ukrainian couple I know to put more g—–n buns in her oven, because they only have one son. Unfortunately, there seems to be a cultural preference for only having one in large parts of Europe.

Finesse the reproduction figures to reflect the huge dysgenic imperative at work. in Western countries. The fast breeders are low IQ welfare queens, especially blacks and Muslims, useless eaters, while upper scale women, corrupted by feminism, have few if any offspring.

Regardless, whites have always been outnumbered. We don’t win by overwhelming them with quantity (“r-selection”) but quality (“K-selection”). Outbreeding is the brown strategy, brute force vs precision munitions. That strategy ultimately fails and is one reason why the world speaks English, not Mandarin. Ask the Persians at Thermopylae and the Zulus at Rorke’s Drift and the spics at the Alamo. Or read about how the Raj 3,000 dominated the subcontinent, or the swiftness with which the Boxer Rebellion was quelled. The swarms achieve localized wins over small bands of isolated and surprised men but also conveniently amass themselves for barrel-fish-shooting and gaudy casualty ratios.

All the pussy pessimism. The drums of war should thrill you, not intimidate you. We have a perfect record against the bugs going back 2500 years, so boringly perfect that we periodically/inevitably turn on our own kind for shits and giggles. What makes you think this Scots-Irish cussedness has been bred out of us in the space of just a few generations?

Are you the son of world-conquering and dominating warriors? What will you do with the culture and civilization they bled to bequeath you? Whine like a woman and cluck like Chicken Little? Gaze upon the third world’s impotent works and despair?

The more the enemy breeds, the more efficiently they die, the more are trampled in the panicked retreat. No need for tight groupings, no sniper shots required. Simply set yourself to spray. This strategy applies equally to the Cold Civil War and any hot skirmish that may flame up in the meantime. The only enemy deadly enough to defeat us is our own deficient morale, and you are an anti-cheerleader infecting the environment with inapt, gratuitous gloom.

That’s great writing Matt and you’re pushing an open door as far as I’m concerned. In my personal and avatar lives I take no prisoners, easy enough now that I’m in my mid-sixties and have what I call ‘fuck you money’, i.e. enough to live comfortably on even if I never earn another penny.

But think of the majority of Whites out there. Productive citizens, their industry and prudence fuelling the very drones set to out-breed them. Their livelihoods and even liberty at risk should they deviate from the Cathedral’s orthodoxies. Deprived of political and media outlets, the decks are heavily stacked against them.

We should have listened to Ben Franklin: ‘those who beat their swords into ploughshares usually end up plowing for those who kept their swords’

It may be an age thing. Just know that young men are looking to men of your station for guidance (whether they are consciously aware of it or not) and that despair is doubly poisonous from above. If the Silverbacks are freaking out about our chances, then we must truly be doomed indeed.

If you have fuck-you money, start fuckyouing some of these cunts.

I take solace in the connections made in fora like these, for what they’re worth. Our presence here reminds me there are others equally convicted, and that “it takes one man with conviction” to forge his own “majority.” We have six-to-ten-times that many who frequent here by my count.

I am the boy in Reagan’s famous happy-warrior story excited by a roomful of shit: there has to be a pony in there somewhere.

Matthew I agree. Telling kids about the decline, or even that there is a decline, has little point and could be depressing. I don’t see the value.

Instead, teach them to have no more respect for women than warranted and to act masculine around them consistently, relentlessly. I am not so sure this is possible in school with all the female teachers and administrators, the most powerful people, and leftwing influences. But they can try and at least work out elements of game.

From there on, it’s their life to live. They cannot singlehandedly reverse the decline. They may even want to escape it and go somewhere else. But it’s their world, and it and all its women will be waiting for them.

Well I’ve certainly found that with my own son and his friends, even when they were teens. They were very receptive to taking the red pill. My son is totally awakened as is his wife. I helped them to join the dots and if anything they’re even more outraged than I am by whast’s being done to us.

But for every one of them there are 10,000 useful idiots hastening their own destruction. But don’t worry, I’m carrying on the fight 24×7.

And by the way, were just the muds to be our enemy I wouldn’t fear. As you say they – on their own – are easily overcome despite overwhelming numerical superiority. But they are just the shock troops and potential cannon fodder for the superior brains directing the war. YKW in jujitsu-like fashion have turned Whites’ superior characteristics against themselves. To wit, the subject of this post, feminism.

No doubt. The enemy within, the self-hating traitor, the slothful puppet comprise the real threat. The gook is in the wire.

So we proceed first by discrimination, then segregation (note the status of these terms as shocking curse words to the modern ear), then reconnection. In the past this process had a physical component — we all had to move next to each other. And all things being equal, having our own state and nation is still the sine qua non.

But today we can cause effective, de facto separation and create Tocquevillian civil society the way we are doing right now — through instantaneous, thick communication networks. I was recently reading about Sam Adams and the “committees of correspondence,” which were related to the development of the Sons of Liberty, which eventually became local shadow governments prior to the (avoidable) war. That kind of “correspondence” has never been easier to establish today — if also easier to infiltrate, granted.

The strategic template is there for lovers of liberty and men of testicular fortitude; for Americans the rebellious frame of mind is in our history, in our blood. And the tactical instruments have never been more refined or easier to procure. We merely have to marry the esprit of the founding revolutionaries to the modern weaponry at our fingertips.

Then we flush the cowards into the open. We are not up against honorable Red Coats. We are confronting beady-eyed rats, supine lupine nocturnal scavengers and skittering skittish parasites. We are performing a work of political sanitation. Maintenance, even. Self-starters and bloody-minded radicals are not needed so much as bourgeois custodians.

What country ever existed a century and a half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them.

What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure.

haha ever heard of the mongols? genghis khans army got as far as…poland i believe. and contrary to the original sources, no there werent hundreds of thousands of them. in fact the typical mongol army was 20,000 to 40,000 elite badass not afraid to die horse archers, with some auxilaries thrown in. and they would defeat much larger opponents, including 70,000 of the finest knights europe could muster at the battle of the vistula river.

The Mongols went to Egypt, to present day Iraq, to Turkey, to China, everywhere BUT Western Europe. Now, why was that you ask? 1. Mongol Compound bows fell apart in the rain and it rains ALL THE TIME in Western Europe. 2. Mongol ponies were fast and manuever based, but in Western Europe swamps, hills, forests, MUD EVERYWHERE, mountains, rivers etc. make war of manuever not an empty plain or steppe or desert where armies can go everywhere but a straight out slugfest which Mongols were spectacularly BAD AT.

Once Mongols penetrated deep into Western Europe their advantages were massively overthrown, bows fell apart and ponies no match for chargers in straight on fights.

Not exactly. The Mongols were MORE than happy to absorb conquered populations, and even retain them in ethnic armed formations within their own Empire. And got they got beyond Poland….. they reached (what is now) Ashdod. No Whites ever did a more efficient job of conquest than the Mongols.

Actually it was 30,000 that held the Indian sub-continent – according to M.K.Gandhi but even so Indian provinces were in the habit of surrendering to one British officer and his dog – and they still do; did not Kabul surrender to John Simpson (unarmed) – and his BBC film crew? Even so, a higher birth rate than the average corporate cubicle bitch is now managing might not be entirely undesirable, but I am not volunteering my services (except as practice).

Mathew King
That strategy ultimately fails and is one reason why the world speaks English, not Mandarin
—————————————————————————————————
The world speaks English because English is a bastard mongrel language that collects and adopts words from all other languages.

Mandarin, not so much.

Simply put, English is sucessful because it is the language of diversity. Its inclusivity is its greatest strength.

Dumbass… the reason English has such a rich texture is that, when one’s horizons expand, one gleans all sorts of tidbits from hither and yon.

And this “diversity” you speak of is not the modern day meaning of the term… it’s merely the “diversity” of predominantly Indo-European peoples who would be pretty much indistinguishable from one another (especially to you darkies) unless you heard their accents.

You know, you keep talking your n166er-babble until you wear out even the most patient and long-suffering, and when they finally just shake their haid and walk away, you claim victory.

At least in French eclectism ( sometimes the English definitions are slightly different ) is taking the best of different things, it is about being very efficient, it is what intelligent people do, it is what Anglo Saxons have done and why they dominate the world not only with their language.

while embracing diversity is almost the opposite; you take things only because they are different no matter if they have value or not.

To keep it simple, look at it this way, making a cake the eclectic way means taking the best ingredients no matter where they are from to make the best cake you can, and it usually works damn well.

while diversity is putting a little of everything in the recipe (so that no one will feel left out ) and hoping the cake will still taste good…that is no way to make a cake, in the end it ruins the cake.

The swarms ultimately lost. The point was that even when massively outnumbered we put up resistance that nearly matched the enemy’s only strength, which is why we remember and honor those battles where “few stood against many.”

Our gaudy kill ratio is such an understood fact that modern warfare has adjusted itself around it. Our enemy fights us in our own media to destroy morale, because it is their only chance. Granted, given the decadence of our culture it is a good chance. Which makes the real battle internal.

The point is to apply the wisdom that led to our unquestionable dominance externally to the saboteurs internally. It is largely a matter of persuasion (seduction) and our will. At no point should brute numbers of imbecilic savages intimidate us in an essentially rhetorical struggle to maintain morale. Because a loss of morale — not an influx of wetbacks or the petty machinations of YKWs — is the only threat to our comprehensive domination.

Talking up the threat is important — to the point where we identify it in all its fullness. Not underestimating the enemy is likewise vital — to the point where we don’t overestimate them either. We are reaching the stage where rumors of the enemy’s power are beginning to cause good men to throw up their hands in despair before we have “yet begun to fight” (J.P. Jones). Either we police ourselves against this stinkin-thinkin, or we allow it to metastasize into one of few forces that can actually destroy us.

N.B.: Infighting over superficial low-priority disagreements or distinctions without a difference is another of those forces.

Normally interesting comments but now you argue like a woman and forget facts in favor of sentimentalism: that not too long ago, whites had FAR above replacement birthrates, which are nowhere to be found in the western world nowadays (>4 children per women, +/- 1 due to mortality). Second, whites have only been minority to Chinese and SouthEast Asians, for centuries Europe had far greater populations than Africa, America or even the Middle East (after the 1700’s precisely when Islam stopped being an existential threat for Europe, what a coincidence…).

Unless us whites start bucking the trend, in noticeable numbers, decline here we go (and no I don’t believe we will go extinct but our cultural/political weight will go down, that’s for sure. And decline includes collapse, civil war or outright invasion Matt)

I am surprised Matt, that you would feature a quote from Jefferson just before the masonic french revolution in which how many innocent catholics were slaughtered?
How many jacobins dressed in drag as lady liberty shat all over catholic churches?

Giant Eastern armies used hordes of soldiers whipped into frenzy to frighten their enemies into panic. From the Greek Hoplites to the Romans, Westerners developed an anti-terror approach.

In other words, facing terror tactics from the East, they developed a discipline to counter it. The Hoplites were a disciplined group standing sh9uld to shoulder against the screaming masses of Eastern forces.

Roman soldiers developed this further. In direct contrast to the screaming hordes of their enemies they learned to ignore the shrieks of their enemies and to stand shoulder-to-should in a line that did not pay any attention to the emotion and sheer number of the forces against them. They dealt directly with only one thing: the part of the enemy forces that was actually coming up against them.

The numbers of emotion of the forces that were COMING at them was ignored. They stood shoulder to shoulder and killed the disorganized, emotionally charge forces that actually REACHED them.

When you do that, the overwhelming masses and screams that were such a part of war in the East became irrelevant. No matter how they yell, the only ones who matter are the ones who actually reach your lines. And the ones who actually reach your lines from the screaming masses are disorganized pushovers.

Flash forward to the famous British Thin Red Line. If they had thought about what those Zulus would DO to them if they lost they WOULD have lost. But their whole approach was to ignore that and:

“Stay in Formation! Load! Aim! FIRE!”

I am not impressed that non-whites can get a hundred thousand demonstrators at with a snap of their fingers. It is the same old equation whites have always faced. Non-whites were always infinitely more impressive. And they always lost.

There is an old adage of Western military strategy: “One native can beat one civilized – white – soldier.” “In a battle between ten savages and ten white soldiers, the outcome is a tossup.”

“But when there are a hundred disciplined white soldiers, the savages, a thousand or a million, are doomed.”

I’m not sure where you’re getting this 50/50 male female split from. I don’t think these women are including any sons in their little fantasies. They want to raise little princesses to be just like themselves.

Society does not respect pregnancy anymore,so when you are pregnant you get called things like fat and you are made ashamed. When you stay home to raise a family instead of working and making money, women and MEN make fun of you and say you are unintelligent like so many of the men (boys) here.

You have never been pregnant have you? I was treated exceptionally well when I was pregnant. People will stand up and let you have a seat on the train when you’re pregnant and no one ever said, or even hinted, that I was fat.

Since I have been a stay-at-home mom the only attitude I have ever received has been from working women who feel the need to justify their own abandonment of their children. I have never had a man show the slightest disrespect because I raise my own kids.

Bingo! I occasionally look up people I know on FB. Without exception, those who see themselves as having a ‘great sense of humour’ are in fact utterly devoid of same. Sure, they have a collection of jokes they keep repeating, make a lot of ‘funny’ faces and laugh loudly. But as for real wit…………

Ah, I just did. She’s more physically unattractive than initially perceived. Still an 8/10 after further adjustment for mental instability. Crazy women are crazy, but also freaks in the bed so it mitigates their unattractiveness.

“Heintz mentioned to me that her documentary about the project, entitled “Playing House”. Part One of the documentary will be released in March 2014. You can watch the trailer here.
Her Artist’s Statement discusses the expectations placed on the Modern Woman (whether by society, family and friends or, even, herself), Heintz points to “deeply ingrained mixed messages, from both previous and present generations”. When it comes to life, particularly women’s lives, “fulfilled” is the new “perfect”; “the path to fulfillment is not through one thing, it’s through all things; Education, Career, Home, Family, Accomplishment, Enlightenment.” The trouble with this is that “if any one of these things is left out, it’s often perceived that there’s something wrong with your life.””

I have to disagree. 1950’s Manhattan was the last time Art was interesting -Pollack, Jasper Johns, Raushenberg and Kerouac in writing. It became fucked up later with Warhol and his stupid soup tins. True American heroes who forged their own path

All right, I bow to your superior knowledge of art. I picked Pollack as an example of modernism – a break away from traditionalism – but I could have possibly picked a better example to illustrate the tripe that is being “created” nowadays. I think it may have been Irish Savant who linked a blog on a previous article about how this modern art became in vogue. It was vigorously promoted by those with money, and traditional painting styles were labelled “kitsch”. There are a few hints for you there. It was a fascinating, historical read. If I can find the link again, I’ll put it up here

I want you to place your yourself in the shoes of one of the types who trolls this blog and others like it. I’d say blue-piller, but I don’t really like the term.

This picture is a great embodiment of how they’d view the very, very simple concept of social proof game.

Men like Heartiste can try all they want to convince people that, yes, having people around you enjoying your company is good for other social interactions, but they’ll fail so hard and so repeatedly at connecting the dots to actual human interaction that we get retarded women like this, and men with Fuck Me Silly my Little Ponies trying to, not only mock us, but convince us that those are equivalent.

“LOL look see I have people with me and girls/men still don’t want anything to do with me lol everything CH writes is a lie u misogynists.”

“My advice is that if you really don’t want ever have kids become a cougar. Don’t go into full on middle aged cunty spinster mode. Dead serious.”

lol. Mother Theresa didn’t have kids.

[CH: Mother Teresa also tended to the sick and poor as a vocation. Exceptions? Rules? McFly?]

I think she turned out ok. Oddly enough, when I was a teenager, I wanted to grow up to become a Catholic nun. That didn’t work because I am an agnostic and a sexual person.

But that sort of sentiment still drives me I think. I am drawn to a life of contemplation. Family life seems antithetical to that. I am very reclusive and I don’t drink alcohol, so it’s not that I want to go to parties and meet alphas or pursue a corporate career. I feel like I’d rather be able to sit at home and read *all the time* instead of having kids.

You are not “sexual” until a man’s sperm joins with your ova and a living breathing human child emerges from your birth canal nine months later.

What you are doing right now is NOT sex.

We don’t really have a word for it in English – “utterly purposeless and nihilistic fornication” – but until the pollen moves from the Anther into the Pistol and the resulting seeded fruit is produced come harvest season, sex has NOT taken place.

I live for the pursuit of knowledge. Ideally this means not cumulative factual knowledge, but an abstract understanding of the nature of the universe. Ideally, the pursuit of this understanding is what I’d like to invest maximum energy into. Watching a one year old around like a hawk to make sure it doesn’t put dangerous stuff in its mouth every ten seconds is not an appealing use of my mental focus.

Isn’t it strange, how so many of us could want children and want to offer them all we can, without thinking of what they’ll offer us in return.

We must be nuts, eh? Go your own way, we don’t understand each other. I tried, but now I see you’re outside of what I can empathize with. I’ve found you interesting, and may again find you interesting, for this reason. But fundamentally we’re just different, and I don’t say that of most women.

Don’t assume all women who are childless by 30 are so by choice. I’m happily married, but we recently found out we can’t have children due to an accident my husband suffered as a child. It’s heartbreaking. We are grieving, almost as though someone died. I try to be compassionate, but I do feel anger toward women who treat such a sacred gift of creating life as an inconvenience to their busy schedules of spinning their wheels while waiting to die 😦

If you “live for the pursuit of knowledge” pursue some about Mother Theresa and find out just how bad a person she was, lording it over her poverty-stricken charges as if they were dogs…..Too funny, this hypocrisy!

children are meant to abate burgeoning aged female insanity by providing an outlet for positive feminine qualities when the price point of dat azz hits subzero for the alpha dudes that generate them tingles

It’s not about owning a person. I have no desire to own a person. I’ve never heard a woman express anything like that. And it shouldn’t be about getting attention, either (although for some it definitely is). It’s about wanting to give and sustain life. What else could be more important?

That said, some people just don’t want it. I give them credit for being open about it. It’s much better than having kids just to appease someone, or society generally.

Actually, it’s not better for society when members of a species who are perfectly capable of reproduction *choose* not to reproduce. That door leads to death of the species.

It’s Western Civilization’s fault that we’ve produced a large number of women (and men) who do not desire to have children. It’s also the fault of Western Civilization that we have lost the shaming mechanism as a society to force such people to have children.

My post was about not having kids, so why would I be concerned with the kind of kid I am capable of having?

Also, I’m not at 20%. I’m still within the window of peak fertility. The decline only starts after age 31.

I also don’t see what is so awful with autistic people, especially the way it is diagnosed today. I also have very much liked every person with Down Syndrome I ever met, and I think if I had a kid, I would love a neurotypical one as much as a child with a different kind of mental profile.

Why not volunteer at a DS centre, or at the special olympics? It’s a vicarious solution to having the type of kids you might desire. The traditional cultures used to call them “a blessing”. Now there’s a good chance they’ll get vacuumed onto the slag heap if they’re spotted in time on the ultrasound

Haha! You want to have a mentally retarded child as much as you’d like to have a normal child? What a tool! You truly are screwed in the head. Textbook example of what happens to the overly-educated female.

According to her sight, which I slogged through for a moment or two, she does all of this to “show you can be somebody without a Mrs. or PhD attached to your name!”. In other words, she’s failed at life and instead of accepting her own lack of worth, she does the typical leftist/female thing and redefines reality to wash away the ability to perceive her own shortcomings as failures. Essentially her message is that you should be proud of what you’ve made of yourself without actually having made anything of yourself Whatever the hell that means.

And wow, but does she take herself seriously as some kind of “artist”. Though to be fair, “con” is a type of artist so, well, there is that I guess.

The aggressor in any conflict determines the language and rules and outcome, pretty much no matter what else. Failure to adopt the rules and language of the enemy is a big mistake. The goalposts are set by whoever is willing to do the most fuked up crap to win.

“Lauren “LMoney” Martin grew up with one goal: to be the first woman engineer. Upon finding out there were women engineers already, she chose to study advertising at Penn State University, which led to an attempt at acting and ended in a career as a comedy writer.”

Let’s break this down:

“with one goal in life: to be the first woman engineer” – not to be just an engineer or to explore her inner calling and love for engineering principles.

“Upon finding out there were women engineers already” – Special Snowflake status instantly vaporized … by other feminist woman of all things.

“she chose to study advertising ” – Yeah, no women in that field.

“which lead to an attempt at acting” – Hey, at least she “engineered” an attempt.

“ended in a career” – see how women instinctively know that anything they “ended</b in" is shit!

Upon discovering she could not avoid flunking the pre-pre-prerequisites for engineering, and damn it she could not blame sexism because a few other women had managed to get though, she decided to make an excuse and switch to something she could do.

No..insulting the intelligence of feminists. Gotta piece it together but it’s quite clear. 3 cheers for female engineers who legit just want to engineer things. I know many and granted it’s a masculine role generally but they don’t shriek about how they’re special because their an engineer who is female

The tragedy of this century is nothing more then our most reproductively sound women going to college and not staying home, getting married and staying pregnant. Keep her pregnant and nursing until she is 25 and make her homeschool. The problem is school is seductive, women naturally do good at schoolwork, and the schoolwork is designed for women to do well, and keep them in school. Is it any coincidence the school year is 9months, same with pregnancy.

” Is it any coincidence the school year is 9months, same with pregnancy.”

Yes, in fact, that is sheer coincidence. The school year has always been traditionally modeled around the summer time due to agriculture. During prime growing season you’d want your young boys out helping you in the field and the lady folk at home tending to everything else as you brought in the crop to keep them all alive over the winter.

When honorable but naive whites in a diverse society try to use honesty boxes to sell their garden produce in roadside stands, it behooves honorable but shrewd whites to vandalize the honesty boxes as a proof of concept.

Those are called “honesty boxes”? Neat. First time I saw them was way, way up north in Michigan a few years back.

I felt quite complimented actually that random strangers trusted me to do the right thing (seriously, they actually reminded me that there is hope for the world). Purchased some items from a couple of them, paid the required amount, felt damned good about life.

It’s probably not worth noting, but far far northern Michigan doesn’t seem to have any…um…diversity. Wonder if there’s a correlation between that and the rather numerous “honesty boxes” I saw? I can’t recall seeing any such “honesty boxes” outside of Cleveland or Detroit.

Cadding is only good for society if you’re an otherwise would be decent guy who is coerced into the lifestyle of being a player by the fact that most of the women nowadays are so corrupt that it’s either play them or be played by them. In that way it could have a corrective effect because giving these kind of women what they want and letting this shit carry on without protest is the worst possible thing for society.

“Being a cad” is what happens when “the society” fails to provide a productive outlet for the energies of unabashed men. You have the causation backwards.

The NFL and Call of Duty can only do so much to vicariously abate the manly urges, which do not relent out of cultural pressure, much less cunty little feminist legalisms.

Game is invaluable because it is the first practical instance of reasserting discipline over manly nature while concomitantly allowing release from the hundred-year pressure valve. It gentles a man’s condition — in the old sense (“This day shall gentle his condition” from the St. Crispin’s Day speech). It ennobles low instincts, which power deliberate acts of the will away from accidental burnout/self-destruction.

In other words, practitioners of game are the true gentlemen of our era.

The goal now must be conscious self-discipline as something worthy (something practical) to strive for, rather than as a means to achieve a couple instantly-disappearing moments of pleasure denied them in their former lives. Once men rediscover and contain the nuclear fusion they possess — no less a power than a teenaged girl inherits, unearned, to attract any man on the planet — they will be able to harness it into a perpetual power plant rather than just going off like a bomb, one-and-done.

PUAs should be on to phase two by now, organizing men into squads and mowing down entire barrooms full of women, on general principle and with extreme prejudice, slaughtering slot until sluts rediscover the utility of modesty perforce. They should be thinking like warriors rather than thieves. What young man would refuse recruitment to the front lines in this war between the sexes, this honor plus eros, where fucking is the fighting, and where bitches ache to surrender in droves?

Used to be there weren’t virtual realities and handheld gizmos and cultish pastimes and a million divertissements either. Just because distractions are currently siphoning off the surface of youthful initiative, it doesn’t mean there aren’t deep wells of energy there for the tapping. Whether this vast reserve of power is squandered, diverted, mismanaged, or channeled to productive ends is up to the graybeards in leadership to provide or fail to provide.

Young men don’t “provide” the way, they provide the energy. The men who survive youth are the ones who organize and direct the next generation’s disparate, unbound, and chaotic resources. They are wise enough to provide order, leadership, and efficiency. That’s you. So get to work.

Which gang is mine? I was never a part of a manly one. I learned not to take by force, but through conniving.

The greybeards in my family/society already failed to instill an us vs them in me. In fact, they were the fucking losers. They allowed their women all this power over me, you and every fucking one of us just for a few votes and approval.

I speak as a young man – I have nothing to lose. I might create an us entirely by myself… but those would be my brother and my own kids/friends/brother’s kids. That’s it.

Those milquetoast SWPLs with liberal arts degrees in wymyn studies just don’t cut it. They can squander their worthless seed into the abyss of extinction. I won’t.

I don’t have a gang today. Not a big one, at least. But I will. It may take time. But I will take what I want. Anyone who tries to stop me – white milquetoast or black – will be destroyed. Not because I will kill him. But because he is killing himself already, and I don’t even need to.

But I assure you – for every 25 year old man who has a will like mine there are 1000 others who are crying their pansy hearts out for some fat short haired slut who gobbled up some good looking douche’s cum by the gallons behind their backs.

Those wretched excuses for manhood deserve death, and nothing better. Why, they are products of poor seed in the first place, the way I see it.

That you found your way here despite your family’s “fucking loser” background is proof of concept: there is an irreducible soul in a man that cannot be touched by the enemies of nature. He just requires a mentor to remind him of his essential manhood.

We are the transition generation: we won’t see the promised land. We have to leapfrog back and seek mentors from the past so that we can be models for our sons fast arriving to take up the cause. Their sons will anchor the last relay to victory. Our job is to make the task easier for them.

It is an honor to be the link between our ancestors and our progeny, especially because the haters of life present in this age are so hellbent on severing the “mystic chords of memory.”

Who are you for? You are for your seed. You are for your kind. Yours is not just to produce the next generation but to bequeath them a place where they can flourish, where they can ally with people like them and extend the line in perpetuity. They will be have to be made into men, a dangerous pursuit in this era of estrogen, but what of danger? Danger reminds you that you are alive. And our enemies are cowards who skulk in the dark. Take your light out from under the bushel basket and they shrivel into dust.

You are for your brothers who are more numerous than you (are allowed to) think. Talk openly enough to find them where you live. The power of the “n-word” cuts both ways: when I say it, a flag goes up, the bitches bitch, the SWPL wrinkle their noses and threaten with hot air (and a whiff of arugula). But the stouthearted rally. We are blessed to have such a powerful, identifying code word.

Mathew King
The power of the “n-word” cuts both ways: when I say it, a flag goes up, the bitches bitch, the SWPL wrinkle their noses and threaten with hot air (and a whiff of arugula). But the stouthearted rally. We are blessed to have such a powerful, identifying code word.
—————————————————————————————————–

But you cannot win because you lack the skin.

You ain’t no real ni66a, you just a derivative; you derive all your value from the performance of another underlying, tangible, real, entity. Stop trying to cheat an honest man.

You’re right to an extent Sky, but the problem is that it’s like finding a bright side to being on a sinking ship. Sure, you’re all going to die most likely, but at least nobody is at the buffet (since they’re running for the lifeboats) and you can have all the free food you want!

You’re right to an extent Burn, but the problem is that expecting anything else is expecting human nature to be something it is not. The ship’s sinking, cool. No one’s going to sacrifice their sexual satisfaction to plug up the holes. The mindset of cads (particularly those with dark triad personality traits – which is most cads): better to drown on a full stomach than an empty one.

Nothing stops it from spinning. The idea is how to use it to your advantage.

Life isn’t all about nihilism, you can create order out of chaos. Use their tools against themselves, which is in fact usually referred to as “making her hamster spin”. Let it spin and spin and spin, and when enough of their collective mind herd start talking they’ll either figure out that they need to stop giving it away so easily, or, well, Western civ is over. If there’s a chance to salvage West Civ, I for one would rather at least try to do so than to consign my fate to burning buildings and wondering hordes of orcs from the inner city roaming the land.

To be honest I really do not and have not understood at a deep psychological level the impulse to deconstruct everything in life without even a vague inkling that perhaps we should plan on building something to place in its stead. Nihilism as a singularity of philosophy is illogical.

Proceed from the truth that no woman is born a lesbian but rather is abused (sexually, physically, ideologically, gastronomically) into one.

Haha now she’s telling me she “doesnt see gender (sex)”

Be sure to revisit this issue when you are balls-deep and pounding the breath of life out of her. Taunt her, make her recant it in the gasps you permit to escape from under choking hands. You don’t argue with women, you demonstrate truth to them, on them, in them. The revolution will be won in the trenches (between a girl’s legs).

Everyone, all around, prefers this method, even if they are LUGs playing bisexual during the day to appease their campus ethos and to get an A from Professor Dyke. You will be doing the Lord’s work.

The Indian chick would be helpful, as well as fun on her own. Does the Latvian know how to contact her?

Other than that, she’s a butch (she was playing alpha male) so I think it’d be hard. If she were femme, you could offer the upgrade to a real cock. But I think the reason things were “off” is that you’re dealing with a psychological male.

No way for either of us to get in contact with her. Should have just taken that B to the bathroom.

Your point on her being butch makes sense though. Turns out she isn’t a lesbian or anything, and her overall attitude was pretty feminine, but other aspects of her are masculine. The individuality, traveling free spirit thing.

It’s odd though. She says she really only wants to be buds but she was practically begging me to come over today, telling me how interesting and funny she thought I was and blah blah.

“I really want to see you today”

Perhaps this isn’t the friend zone so much as it is the alpha proving grounds.

I’ve picked her brain a bit, and when I bring out the right wing assholery she gets hot. I can tell. She said she dug that I had backbone.

So I go for round two sometime this week, turn up the alpha and I think I’ll be cool.

there is no such thing as a lesbian. girls are just sexual and sometimes they mess around. its what they do.

now, there are some females, hairy and overly muscular or otherwise obviously exposed to too much testosterone in the womb, that can be legitimately defined as lesbian. if you accept the contentious idea that they’re actually female.

as to ‘doesnt believe in gender’ that hamster is running wild. it means ‘ive already given up loving women exclusively’ so feel free to attach ‘because I want your dick’

It’s not really their fixation any longer, it was the fixation of their 1960’s Brood Sisters. Since feminism has long lacked any intellectual underpinnings, or at best has long kept them under wraps, the modern feminists have nothing new to contribute except rail against a world that hasn’t existed since their grandmother’s were young women. They have no experience with this time period, and talk only in the most glaring chiches about times with which they have no familiarity.

It’s what they keep teaching themselves, so it’s what they keep regurgitating, lacking any originality or intellectual rigor to come up with new “patriarchy” to uphold as evil.

But there’s definitely an obsession with some kind of nightmare, dystopian, “fixed point” in the past, where all women were oppressed, homosexuals had their heads lobbed off by angry mobs, and black children couldn’t go to the store without getting raped. Unfortunately, the Right tends to idealize this same fixed point in time as a magical world where all children were safe, all women were thin and happy, and there were no debates about alternate sexualities.

Yet, it’s all bullshit. Children were still molested in 1950. Women were still fat. Homosexuality was still largely ignored by the general populace. Black kids had a better than 50-50 chance of being born, and better than the current 30-70 odds of knowing their fathers.

The 1950s is quickly becoming a fantasy land that we can project our own desires and hatreds against, that can be defined in any way the commentator wishes. The truth is far more complex, and thus, inconvenient.

This woman’s not referring to the 1950s. She’s referring to an imaginary world that feminist claim to hate, yet seem to be the only ones still propagating through the cultural consciousness. It’s weird.

i just had a weird thought reading that. I’m going to assume the police reports are more accurate. Do you think the subjects now even remember what really happened, or are they now working under the delusion of what they’ve claimed happened.

If it’s just one family member going nuts, you cuff them and haul them off to cool down. Surely the cops could have done that right. The charges to other family members mean the whole family was getting into it.

“Heintz rejects the notion that to be a successful woman means that you have to fulfill a laundry list of achievements, not limited to an education, career, home, family, accomplishment, and enlightenment.”

That’s it right there. Don’t have standards so nobody can judge you. Everyone’s a winner!

No adhering to standards set by society? She rejects that a woman needs a laundry list of achievements? How about rejecting a laundry list for what is required in a man? NO, she would rather die before considering a relationship with a beta. Alone is OK, beta husband is worse then death. A cad mannequin is better then a real life beta is the message I’m reading in her “art”. LOL

Speaking of photos, I have a question for the Chateau, because this is one of the few places I’ll get an answer rooted in reality: is it a good idea to keep photos on social media of you and girls you’ve been with in the past? As long as the photos aren’t too lovely dovey, do you think current prospects would be put off (hindbrain-wise) by the photos or would it work nicely as preselection/jealousy evokers?

I think that’s spot on. Still, I’d imagine it’s a good idea to show *some* decorum and not smear it in their faces. I have a friend (model-like looks, alpha, but not smooth) who has photos of him and his ridiculously hot ex gf slurping each other’s faces off. That’s gotta be too much. I’m thinking a little subtlety would go a long way. Any thoughts?

Fuck decorum. The more it is in their face, the faster their preselection hamster spins. If the pics are only of you side by side with past flings only smiling completely non risque posturing, you would look like only an orbiter than a guy with options.

Related: have seen on Facebook many childless women (“girls”?) in their 30s completely anthropomorphize their dogs, to the point that they throw the dogs birthday parties with party hats and cupcakes, dress them in sweaters, and address the dogs as if they were human (e.g. “my angel,” “my precious cutie pie,” etc.). Must be seen to be believed. Is this what the Freudians would call “displacement”? Not sure which is more disturbing: the behavior or the utter lack of self-awareness.

The funny part to me is that she’s so unwilling to leave Delusion World that she got a fucking mannequin family. Pure refusal to do any kind of honest self-assessment.

CH was right: Pumping and dumping is a valuable public service. Hats off to all the men that ran miles of dick through this worthless chick. I bet that mannequin hears all sorts of inane commentary on her shitty life…

It’s interesting how a facial expression that’s suitable in one setting looks way out of place or shocking in another. I think the mannequin’s facial expression is fixed. Making one with a movable but believable face would be very hard.

Take a few minutes to review your ex girlfriends and notice how many of them have emerged as wasted spinsters or freaks. They never recover from an Alpha. Promiscuity also induces borderline disorder. If you are a “game” student, you know that this is the case, but are too much of a narcissistic psychopath to notice. The Victorian metaphor for the cad, the soulless vampire, reflects the soul theft involved in being a “ladykiller.”

An incomparable and sublime sensual beauty from an elite Ivy asked me out. She was a friend and I adored her, but I knew that I would never marry her. And, that’s what she was after. What of her now? happily married to another man-much better off than my ex’s. Crushed by my outright rejection, she found it easier to do the big settle. I went out with another girl instead and eventually married her. It all turned out for the best.

There is nothing worse for your game than to realize the benefits to the woman and yourself from holstering your weapon.

I started some boxing/MMA stuff about a month ago, and I’d just want to recommend it to anyone interested in building a lifestyle that aids your game. I definitely feel like I’m starting to develop a keen edge.

I was in the red light one evening trying to find an establishment with a TV to watch the game on, so I walk into this bar with a screen, but all they’re showing is UFC. So as I briefly pause to take in the StPierre “tap out” I notice the crowd seems really enthusiastic cheering and I look around and it’s all these skinheads. And there was something off about it, as it seemed exaggerated. Then the penny drops that they’re all a bit behind on the rent. Sure enough, I see the rainbow drapes on the way out. As I filled the rest of the evening with window-shopping etc, I couldn’t shake the disgust of these nu-wave tuff queers getting their violent thrills by watching heavily tatooed naked men slathering all over each other. I prefer my beer cold, my TV loud and my homosexuals flaming.

Sorry CH I don’t care. I hardly ever care what spinsters do. They’re off the radar. Of course they’ll do some pathetic things. That’s all they can do. Too late for them, but I don’t need to bother them or hurt their feelings. The world is full of life, why dwell in impending death?

Amusing though. If it makes her feel better, what’s the harm? And it’s some business for the mannequin maker.

Boomer , she is illustrative of The ENTIRE PROBLEM that Gen X women were aggressively taught to hate men and family!!!!! One of the main ideas of this blog. Feminism destroyed the family and is destroying civilization.

I don’t get this “go to another country” for your woman! (Notice I put in a screamer there). As far as I’ve been able to ascertain, from visiting the vaginas of women on three/four continents (not that many countries) , they’re ALL fucking nuts. Some way beyond the ability of my nuts to deal with once emptied.

Surely, better advice would be “enjoy it while it lasts, play it to last a little longer and then move on with no forwarding address”.

“I’m simply trying to get people to open up their minds and quit clinging to antiquated notions of what a successful life looks like. I want people to lighten up on each other and themselves, and embrace their lives for who it has made them, with or without the Mrs., PhD. or Esq. attached.”

I was just giving some advice to my nephew the other day, I said to him, “98% of the women in this country are NUTS” the other 2% are still women, and you have to understand them if you are going to have peace. You would have to be just a TV addict or one of the drones to NOT notice that women are NUTS today. And I don’t blame the women, per se, I blame the Marionettes who have been playing them in the media, print and electronic, the government schools, the freaking churches and every single aspect of “our” society has been DESIGNED to FUCK with our women’s heads. But guys let me tell you something, WHEN THE MAN tells you that American women are crazy, LISTEN TO HIM. Maybe do what I brother I know did, he went to the UKRAINE and got himself a woman who is LIKE the women of America USED to be. Just watch Bob Hope’s BACHELOR IN PARADISE for a taste of what it was like.

Isn’t the entire point of all this to be a shining cock on the hill for these lost souls? To bring them out of the wilderness, so to speak? I have found in my social experiments that many a lass loses her psychopathology when given a stern hand and stiff shaft.

“We love & obey the formatted image of a well-lived life. So deeply ingrained is that strange auto-grin we put on when a camera is present. Do we live our lives with a keen awareness of how it feels, or just how it looks? If I pass through life without checking off the boxes for a wedding ring and a baby carriage, I will be missing the photo album, but not not the point.”

I don’t think these women have quite fleshed out the consequences of letting their youth and fertility expire without starting a family. The second half of their lives will be entirely devoid of human love and connection. That is fucking depressing. This woman is correct that marriage is a socially constructed norm, but she fails to recognize that it became that way for a damn good reason.

Ignore the Nazis on here (there’s a ton of ’em). The Philippines is an excellent safari destination for wife-hunting. Besides being slimmer and generally more attractive than Western women, their attitudes are also much healthier to nurturing a marriage and a family. They are, in general, much more concerned with pleasing their man than Western women and they’re certainly more sexual, while at the same time being more faithful.

Of course, not ALL Pinays are like this. Some have been infected by Western culture and are nothing but gold-diggers and proto-feminists. But if you choose wisely, you will reap untold rewards.

And most of them speak English very well, which is king, because there can be no true relationship with a woman who don’t speak-ah dah language.

Because of some of your comments and events in my life, I’ve been drawn back to the Christian faith of my youth. It’s been a long time. I’m not sure if I’m looking for justification of my worldview, or looking for answers to make more sense of the ugly world around me. I wasn’t raised Catholic, but I’m increasingly attracted towards Traditional Catholicism.

I may also suggest exploring the Orthodox church. After all, they will be the savior of Christianity In the end times. Their liturgy is also truer to the original Christian liturgy, hence the Orthodox. My criticism of the Roman Catholic Church is that celibacy prevents most of the best minds from entering the priesthood.

I am not much acquainted with or enthusiastic about the ornery, reverse-oriented schismatics. I have no personal experience with SSPX, and if you find like-minded men there who will strengthen your faith, take support where you can get it. Beyond that, such nostalgiacs call to my mind St. Luke chapter 9: “No one who puts his hand to the plow and looks back is fit for the kingdom of God” (62).

The excesses and misinterpretations of Vatican II were solved by the JP2 pontificate. Keep your faith simple and don’t go in for all the gaudy add-ons or get embroiled in trivial Catholica. I have a hundred criticisms of my parish, and plenty to not like about the magisterium; but all I need are the sacraments, mass, and a home for the real presence. I get my wisdom in disparate places thanks to the unprecedented access of the internet, from the Protestant Ravi Zacharias to the Orthodox David B. Hart to the Jew David Goldman (aka “Spengler”) — with my independent judgment as filter for heresy.

My mentor is Father Robert Barron of Word on Fire, who not only unabashedly stands up for orthodox Catholicism in the culture (from film reviews to the application of heavy duty theology to the quotidian life) but also puts out a crackerjack sermon every week, and has an archive going back thirteen years/four full liturgical cycles. I have never heard a bad one, not once, and some are so profound that I have them practically memorized.

So no matter the quality of local fellowship — which, as a Christian, should not faze you — I get regular, high-level guidance from spiritual geniuses. It’s not personalized advice, but I do not require or desire custom-tailored messaging. When a man is intellectually engaged and serious about such matters, as I suspect you are, he only requires a general mentorship. We can fill in the particularities ourselves.

“I tell you, there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who need no repentance.” (Luke 15:7)

be sure to ask them about their interpretation of incest in Genesis, Lot’s progeny leading to jeebus, why its better to dump a load in a whore than to beat your meat, before you down the kool-aid. among other blatant flabbergasting tenants.

security =/= truth and if you depend solely on one group of people telling you how to think yer gonna be SOL

Of course he doesn’t. There’s absolutely nothing Jesus-like about Matthew King at all. He claims the religion, but has no actual intention of following the philosophy.

Of course, the entire Christian religion is a load of manure, what with the utter contradiction of the Old Testament with the New. Only a schizophrenic would be able to be a “true believer” since Christianity is so riddled with contradictions.

be sure to ask them about their interpretation of incest in Genesis,
————————————————————————————————

They got answers for that and its very interesting. The reason many people have trouble accepting scripture is because they make too many assumptions based on their contemporary existence.

For example, many people both black and white have great difficulty imagining what life was like before the existence of a global system of white supremacy. They just can’t wrap their tiny minds around the concept so they make assumptions and then wonder why things don’t make sense.

Think about this, before there was radio, tee-vee and amplification, in order to be a leader of men, you had not only be a master of language, but you had to have a STRONG, LOUD VOICE.

People had to be able to hear you.

Biblical scholars say people in the past were healthier and stronger than today and according to some researchers there is a scientific basis for this reasoning.

Well a black man, ain’t got nothin in the world today….

But you know in the old days, when the black man was a strong man, all the people step back when the black man walk by.

God ‘ol thwack, reminiscing for the days when monkey muscles were more important than neocortex function. Those were the days! Ah, yes, if we could only go back… But wait, you can! A one way ticket to Africa will only cost you $995.

be sure to ask them about their interpretation of incest in Genesis, Lot’s progeny leading to jeebus, why its better to dump a load in a whore than to beat your meat, before you down the kool-aid. among other blatant flabbergasting tenants.

security =/= truth and if you depend solely on one group of people telling you how to think yer gonna be SOL

Who told YOU that you could comment when men are talking?

You fairy.

Come and get one in the yarbles, if’n ya got any yarbles… eunuch jelly, thou!

Women, last I checked, don’t have to get married or have children anymore. The contempt, staging, and costumes in these photos all would seem to indicate a twisted interpretation of reality. The only person imposing this worldview on her is, therefore, her.

[…] A very homely, urbanely decayed spinster has taken photographs of herself posed with male and child mannequins, presumably as some sort of statement on the present condition of her bifurcated ego. […]

Your hypothesis has been considered. In 1979 Dr. Pierre Mornell wrote the book “Passive Men, Wild Women,” the exact dynamic you’re describing.
It caught my attention years later because I saw my own mother & father as well as many other couples acting it out.

So yeah, millions of American men came home from work wanting to be left the fuck alone in front of the tube and wifey went bat-shit. It’s only gotten worse – so bad in fact that we’re now in the era of the “man – cave,” a repulsive concept which is really just surrender.

Funny that this book came out at the exact moment when all that sensitivity bullshit was really taking hold. You say “the hard work of putting women in place,” and it’s true but the equally hard work of getting into and staying in the UMC sapped or distracted the post-war American male wrt fundamental male/female truths.

[…] If you thought 21st Century American women have plumbed the depths of crazy, you’d be wrong. There’s totes crazy left in those desiccated wombs and ravaged holes where their feminine hearts used to reside. Expect to see a plague of crazy visited upon the women of the West, as the modern diversity industrial complex and no-holds-barred sexual market drives the wedge deeper between their mothering and materialistic desires. We have only begun to bear witness to a total meltdown of the American woman’s psyche. https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2014/02/17/crazy-american-women-are-getting-crazier/ […]