If you’d asked us 15 years ago how likely it was that Afghanistan would become a Test team by 2018, here is a list of things that we would have rated as being more likely.

Pretty much everything

They’re not an especially good Test team going by the scorecard for their inaugural Test, but then Afghanistan’s rate of improvement is so steep that you wouldn’t bet against them were this a five match series.

For now, it’s enough that they’re playing at all. As Afghanistan’s then minister of finance, Dr Omar Zakhilwal, said back in 2016 ahead of their first one-day international: “There is nothing that can touch cricket in popularity or as a force for good in Afghanistan. There is absolutely nothing else that mobilises our society in the same way.”

Afg have been very naive in their approach, which is understandable.
My feeling, is that bowling is more to do with natural talent and afg bowlers will do better, but test match batting is more of a mindgame unless you are as talented as Kevin Pietersen. Witness woeful batting of west indies and inconsistent batting of Bangladesh, Pakistan etc. I think Afghan batting will not improve much in Tests, for the foreseeable future

Takuro Hagihara must look back on his 5/25 against Afghanistan as the highlight of his cricketing life. Japan would make a great country for Test matches – not a bad climate for it and with all those mountains around I’m sure they would manage some very picturesque stadia.

Looking back at the other teams from that tournament, also a shame that USA and Nepal haven’t really pushed on like Afghanistan have managed.

Indeed, on reviewing my diary from that trip, I realise that we were specifically in Kanker that day and that we played our first impromptu cricket match with Jolly and some riverside locals the day before you published your Out Of the Ashes report. I never got round to writing a match report on that fine match – must put that right soon enough – as I do have sufficient notes and some good pictures thanks to Daisy.

…and of course you are right – I would not have expected Afghanistan to have test status by 2018 but I am jolly glad they have it. I have a feeling they’ll get quite a lot better at test cricket rather quickly. India was a seriously tough first gig.

They’re going to get away with terrible selections because of how great their story is, but losing a Test match in two days is a terrible advertisment for all the hard work that not only they, but every team that spends years in the ICup have put in.

Most of their team could not be called their best first-class team. In fact, most of their team has spent 2018 played limited overs cricket, especially T20 cricket, and did not feature in the most recentl domestic first-class season. Selectors deserve far more scrutiny than they will get.

Interesting piece of trivia – the second Scotland/Ireland T20I match in the Netherlands Tri-series ended in a tie – and in fact this was the first time a T20I has ended in a tie! All previous matches in such circumstances have gone to a super over to determine the winner, but rather mysteriously (cricinfo can’t figure out why it happened) this one did not.

Quite agree – I do think that if the two teams are level after the full complements of overs have been completed, the match really deserves the epithet of “tied”. It’s earned it, in a way that a match decided by twelve super-balls of a super-over hasn’t really earned the epithet “victory” or “defeat”.

I tried to post some trivia of my own yesterday but was denied by malign influences beyond my control. Shannon Gabriel’s heroic efforts in taking 13-121 against Sri Lanka would, had his team gone on to lose, have been the best-ever match analysis for a playing finishing on the losing side.