Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.

its the quantum space time leverage components associated with the twist of dark matter as the photons are excited during the radio communications.

causing a semi transparent conflicting junction that is not bound by the fabric of space , that in fact this junction tears through the fabric of space thereby tearing time itself lending itself to the increasing velocities of the transmissions.

which results in a backwards movement of time seen only by the radio transmission as it observes the two points of transmission.

the radio transmission itself accelerates faster at point B

than at point A

as the transmission is transmitted its as if the beginning of the transmission which is further from the earth is overcome by the end of the transmission because the beginning of the transmission is shrinking as it approaches c.

and before the dinner bell rings the end of the transmission actually passes the beginning of the transmission.

the end of the transmission whirls past the beginning of the transmission which whips the beginning past the end

this process repeats itself until time has driven it backwards.

but you probably already knew that.

_________________________
3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.

Sounds just like what I hear on the phone when I call the other side of the world. My own voice coming back faint and unclear occasionally.

Still, it's kind of pointless trying to make anything of these videos because we don't know how they were edited. You can't see anyone's mouth moving so there's no need for the sound to be synchronized with the picture - they're free to cut out audio pauses whenever they want for viewer convenience.

No one picked #2: There was a full moon on Nov 19, 1969. lol! So much for my childhood memory. I guess it was just an "almost" full moon. That's what struck my curiosity...When I read that we have never landed on a full moon, my childhood memory said, "Hey, wait a minute here..."

OK here's a bunch of rough calculations that show the Moon wasn't in the plasma sheet while the Apollo Nov astronauts were there. Doesn't say anything about the magnetotail in general which is all vague and big.

The angle between the moon and the line straight away from the Sun is 0 degrees on Nov 23It's about 20 degrees on Nov 21 (23-21)/30 * 360degIt's about 50 degrees on Nov 19 (23-19)/30 * 360deg

The angle between the edge of the plasma sheet at the moon's orbit, and the line straight away from the Sun is arctan(3/30) = 6 degrees.

So, the sequence of events would be:Land on moon at 50 degreesLeave moon at 20 degreesPlasma sheet hits at 6 degreesFull moon at 0 degreesTherefore the astronauts weren't on the surface inside the plasma sheet.

This has nothing to do with moon landings, fake or otherwise. I post it simply so that others may draw any parallels they see fit.

It is taken from an article in the “Sun” newspaper of 27. Aug. 1967. The article includes a picture, to which reference is made, but the only copy I have is too poor to reproduce.

“I must say this for the flat-Earthers: they don’t scare easily. You might have thought that the latest pictures of a satellite’s-eye view of the Earth, taken from 214,000 miles up, would have shaken them. Not at all.

Mr Samuel Shenton, Secretary and guiding light of the Flat Earth Society, had the answer. Mr Shenton always has the answer: Faked.

‘You see those lines running across the photograph, especially at the bottom? That shows it’s a composite. Mocked up, probably, from a static model’.”

Using a fish eyed lense even a flat earth would appear to be a sphere.

to be blunt about it , as soon as the flat earthers produce any location where I can travel to and look off the edge of the earth , that is when I will begin to believe the earth is flat or that Im hallucinating.

_________________________
3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.

The nature of the cameras used is not really relevant to the fact that even if one could provide evidence that pictures were doctored, or even faked, that would not necessarily prove that the landing didn't take place.

I have just been writing up notes of a geological field trip in which the group leader used some very damaged specimens to demonsrtate how to distinguish between three different fossil genera. The photos I have used in my notes are of fossils from from my own collection as they are better specimens than we had in the field. You might say that my pictures are faked, you would be right, but that would not be proof that I did not visit Chillesford Church Pit on the date in question.