This article originally appeared in the Boston Phoenix on May 27, 1994

Judge Stephen Breyer, Bill Clinton's latest pick for the Supreme Court, has attracted support so broad that it spans ideological and political differences.

And that is precisely why Breyer, a Cambridge resident who is chief judge of the First Circuit Court of Appeals, in Boston, may be the right choice at the wrong time.

Breyer is a technocrat, a brilliant, facile thinker who loves legal minutiae. Every court, including the US Supreme Court, needs technocrats, and Breyer is without doubt the best and the brightest of his kind.

But Clinton was widely reported to be looking for someone not from the traditional judicial mold – someone, instead, who could shake up the Supreme Court and infuse it with the kind of real-life experience, common sense, and humanity that can temper the neat logic of the law. He has not found such a person in Stephen Breyer.

Indeed, what little opposition has been voiced thus far comes from those on the extreme ends of the political spectrum, who worry that Breyer will not carry their ideological water.

Thus, Senator Howard Metzenbaum (D-Ohio) is unhappy because Breyer is skeptical of the ability of the same government that runs the Postal Service to regulate the nation's commercial life.

Likewise, Arthur Kropp, president of the liberal group People for the American Way, and Kate Michelman, president of the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League, have expressed dismay over Breyer's dissenting vote in a 1989 case in which the First Circuit struck down a state law requiring parental permission before a minor could have an abortion. Breyer voiced approval of parental permission. Though arguably problematic, such a position hardly signals opposition to a woman's right to choose.

On the right, a conservative group known as American Cause has announced it will oppose Breyer's confirmation because it fears he will interpret the Constitution too loosely.

Both Bruce Fein, an ultraconservative legal scholar, and Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe, a liberal who may be the nation's leading constitutional-law expert, have hailed Breyer's selection. Fein recently wrote that "champions of judicial restraint and enlightened jurisprudence should be cheering." Tribe commented, "Unlike people who parade their brain in front of others, and unlike people who wear their hearts on their sleeves, I think Steve will lead with his head. When Breyer speaks, his fellow justices will listen."

When Breyer's career and his considerable body of written judicial opinions are studied and understood, the reason for such praise comes into focus. Wall Street Journal legal reporter Paul M. Barrett came closest to the mark, describing Breyer as "a powerful thinker and clear writer," but also "something of a technocrat." Barrett went on:

What will frustrate those who try to pigeonhole Judge Breyer as they comb through his voluminous record of opinions and other writings is the lack of an overarching philosophy. Because Judge Breyer doesn't have a distinct agenda or ideology, his addition to the court won't affect its current conservative tilt in any dramatic way.

Dictator McCain? The only thing standing in the way of Republican John McCain assuming the powers and prerogatives of a dictator should he be elected president is the vote of a single Supreme Court justice.

Obamastrology Another Leo president. That's what we're getting with Barack Obama, and it's even good news on an astrological level.

Speak no evil? Anthony Lewis's free-speech credentials are impeccable: among other things, the former New York Times columnist is James Madison Visiting Professor of First Amendment Issues at Columbia University's Journalism School

Crimson tied Barack Obama's presidential campaign was successful in part because he was able to cleverly negotiate and navigate the battles that have plagued the United States the last few years.

Guilty until proven guilty The US Supreme Court's June 18 decision denying prisoners access to DNA testing — a procedure that could reliably prove innocence — adds to the high court's decades-long shameful record on criminal-justice issues.

Boston's $10 Million Boo-Boos The bill continues to come due for the string of nine wrongful convictions discovered in Boston between 1999 and 2004 — a tab that has now topped $10 million in court settlements.

Ted's turn A little-known provision in the crime bill now being negotiated by a House-Senate conference committee would greatly expand the number of prison cells available to house violent criminals, and it wouldn't be cost a dime. But it may be doomed unless Senator Ted Kennedy is willing to spend some political capital.

Ted Kennedy's real record When a 32-year incumbent seeks re-election, there is a long and well-documented record that can be examined. So it's disconcerting to note that admit all the miles of newsprint and videotape that have been expended covering the US Senate campaign, little has been said of what Ted Kennedy has or hasn't accomplished.

Review: Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs This bizarre animated adaptation of Judi Barrett's cult-classic children's book by Phil Lord and Chris Miller ladles up much to chew on yet little that's appetizing.