Contact Info

More Pages (& Links)

AHMED E. SOUAIAIA

Quick links

Assimilation; Seriously?

President
Nicolas Sarkozy
of France has become the most vocal supporter of the ban on religious symbols
worn by people in public (government) institutions; specifically, the ban on
the headscarf worn by Muslim women. His foundation for this argument is this:
France is for French and anyone wishing to live in France must be fully
integrated and assimilated. At one point, he used the following analogy: If I
am in a Muslim country visiting a mosque, I would remove my shoes. I respect
others’ cultures and I would want others to respect France’s.

The
shoes’ analogy, besides the fact that it is a false analogy, speaks also to the
double standard and hypocrisy of Western elite who privilege their own way of
life as the “standard” that must be emulated by everyone else.

It
is utterly disingenuous for Mr. Sarkozy to make use of the cliché, when in Rome
act like the Romans. For, if that were his position, then he would not have an
issue with women being forced to wear some form of Islamic dress while in Saudi
Arabia or in Iran. Western nationalists such as President Sarkozy are not supportive of a
culture that forces women to dress according to an Islamic code because it
violates women rights. If the aim is to protect women and individual rights,
then the universal argument is that no culture is above the standards that protect
human rights and personal autonomy.

The
real issue is that universal standards for the protection of human dignity and individual
rights are a double-edged sword: legal and social restrictions on women (and
men in many cases) necessarily and universally infringe on individual rights. The
fact is, the ban on Islamic dress, like the prescription of an Islamic dress, equally
infringes on personal autonomy and personal choice.

Choice,
as the expression of free will and the prerequisite of responsibility, must be
available and protected in all societies that recognize personal autonomy. It
is counterproductive to legalize limits on women’s right to dress in France and
other European countries while condemning prescription of Islamic dress in some
Muslim countries. To argue that a woman in Europe should not wear an Islamic
dress, is not different from arguing that a woman must wear Western clothes. After all, the same argument has been made by some repressive regimes in some Muslim countries: women in Muslim societies
must wear Islamic attire.

Here
is the important point: Mr. Sarkozy, in the name of integration thinks that
Muslim women should dress the way the French women dress. Would he accept the
argument by his counterparts in Saudi Arabia who also say that in the name of
integration, all women must dress like Saudi women? Or is assimilation a good
thing only when it leads to Western lifestyles being preserved and privileged? For these reason, President Sarkozy earned to be highlighted in What the &%@#!?