Walter Jones - RIP? Not so fast, brother

At the press conference, Jim Mora was reportedly hesitant and melancholy when asked whether Jones had any chance to play next year.

When asked about Jones' chance to play again, Robbie Tobeck politely stated that he assumed that Jones would retire, simply "because of the type of injury it is," not because of any inside information.

All the beat writers, of course, were sour - the consensus was that if Walter played again, it wouldn't be for the Seahawks. (?? - who would be more motivated to give him a chance?)

Kevin Calabro, a guy I'd rather listen to than literally any other non-athlete voice on the radio Seattle or national, was vehement that the Seahawks needed "to be proactive" in telling Jones where he could get off, and moving on to the next generation.

(This is, IMHO, colored by Calabro's own experiences in watching aging NBA legends albatross their franchises at the end of their careers. "You only get 53 slots," quoth Kevin. Um, ok, only 53, huh?)

.

Q. So why does D-O-V get to be contrarian?

A. Because after all this, Walter Jones gave his own press conference and calmly informed everybody that he'd play next year. Seattle radio, Oct. 28, 2009, Jones said, quote, "I'll do whatever it takes to get back on the football field."

You might retire on his behalf, but it doesn't take him off the NFL active players' list until he retires on his own behalf. And he ain't retiring.

...

My man Calabro went into his don't-let-the-inmates-run-the-asylum mode, which is cool coming from an NBA guy, but in the NFL the wardens run the asylum.

There was some question whether Jones would be able to play this year; the doctors didn't rule that out. Jones will have had a year-and-a-half of rest on the microfracture.

And like we said before, Jones doesn't have to run the hardwood and jump and dunk. He has to shuffle five or six steps sideways on grass.

I'd guess like 60%, 70% chances that he doesn't play next year, but also a 1/3 chance that he would.

.

Q. Would he be any good?

A. Just last year, 2008, he gave up a grand total of 3.5 sacks all season. What would you do with a RDE that totalled 3.5 sacks playing every down?

Provided they're healthy, which is a Jones-sized "if," then HOF linemen can play at 36-37. Jackie Slater played well at the age of 40. Forrest Gregg, 37.Kevin Mawae, 37. With their wing span, size, and technique, they can play.

For sure, a lot of these guys do quit right about at the age of 34-35. But I think a lot of great NFL tackles retire not because of playing badly, but because their legs give out ... oh, wait. :- )

Anyway, the point is, if Walter felt okay, I wouldn't bet against his playing well at 36-37, if he wanted to.

How he feels is the key. I hit 36-37 and that was precisely the age at which my legs started feeling bad. Nobody's saying Walter might not be done. He might be. But I wouldn't call it impossible for him to play well again; that's overstating it.

.

Q. Would it be a charity act on the Seahawks' part?

A. That's what my man KC was selling, but I ain't buying. I think Walter Jones will be better at 38 than an ordinary tackle at 28.

Part of the reason the Seahawks burned six games on Walter, was that they thought he could dominate at 35, right?

Shoutbox

Please log in or create an account to post shouts.

DaddyO: The nice thing about it is, if multiple people are producing at multiple positions as you move into June/July, you have some real trade opportunities, either for prospects or to further upgrade a position, rotation spot, or bullpen slot.25 min 32 sec ago

DaddyO: As stated in numerous articles by beat reporters, this shows the M's are no longer primarily in prospect development mode. A platoon cannot be good for Ackley's development if indeed he is on the cusp of reaching his potential after last year's second half. But, IMO, this is a good thing. This far into his career it SHOULD be for Ackley and all the fellow "used to be young'uns": produce or sit. No more coddling here. Let Ackley and Weeks duke it out for LF PT, and settle for a platoon if it plays out that way. Let LoMo, Montero, and Weeks duke it out for 1B PT. Give Weeks a real shot to emerge as the preferred choice for either of those two positions. Count me in. And if Weeks doesn't earn PT, Weeks sit.27 min 30 sec ago

SABR Matt: So we envisioned Weeks in precisely the role he will get, mostly LF/1B to give those guys days off against tough lefties. Sounds good to me.1 hour 1 min ago

SABR Matt: Good move...and an excellent excuse to let him hone it in AAA for a while and then call him up when someone is hurt later.1 day 2 hours ago

MtGrizzly: @RyanDivish: Taijuan Walker has scrapped his cut fastball and begun throwing a slider. Feels the pitch will have better break and more depth.1 day 5 hours ago

DaddyO: Some of the MLB coverage is delayed, but ROOT Sports is broadcasting live Wed/Thu of next week, and then three weekday games the following week.2 days 4 hours ago

okdan: Shannon Drayer has some cool video up of Patrick Kivlehan, Jordy Lara, and D.J. Peterson taking BP down in Peoria. Just BP of course, but my initial reactions are: Kivlehan looks athletic but a little jumpy at the plate. Lara looks like he could be a beast, big kid. DJ looks patient and cool as a cucumber, like a 10 year vet in the box. Check it out here: http://mynorthwest.com/374/2718894/Video-Mariners-prospects-hit-against-lefty-starter-Happ2 days 4 hours ago

SABR Matt: Correct...MLB.TV's spring schedule shows us getting coverage on the 4th, 5th, 6th, 9th, 11th, 13th, 15th, 18th, 20th, 22nd etc...regional sports network new deal must have included expanded ST coverage. Usually we don't get anything until the 15th or so and then only 6 games all spring.2 days 5 hours ago

DaddyO: IIRC, usually it's not 'til the middle of spring training that we begin to see TV broadcasts.2 days 5 hours ago

DaddyO: On the M's official website here: http://seattle.mariners.mlb.com/schedule/broadcast/index.jsp?c_id=sea2 days 5 hours ago

MtGrizzly: Assuming Weeks can play LF, the bench puts a pretty decent floor on the current roster. The platoon advantages can help cover for under performance a bit. It's curious - individually, I don't really llike Weeks, Bloomquist or Ruggiano but as an ensemble, I think they kind of work.2 days 18 hours ago

moethedog: No weakness at SS. One of those guys will produce.2 days 19 hours ago

SABR Matt: So I see the Mariner offense as having three major ?s SS, LF and 1B. I don't much care for Zunino's chances of being awesome in 2015 either but we don't need him to kill it to be a hero. We need better than we got from SS in 2014 and we definitely need production in LF and at 1B. But of those questionmarks, we have solid possible replacements lined up at 1B (Montero, Peterson, Kivlehan) and SS (Taylor, Marte)...where we are weakest is LF (Kivlehan, Romero)...but there are a lot of teams who would enjoy that sort of weakness in depth.3 days 2 hours ago

moethedog: Dead on Matt. Just posted that I absolutely expect one of the Montero/Kivlehan/Deej/Romero quartet to mash there way into the lineup. Which one? Don't know. But those 4 rolls of the dice are more likely to be a natural than the one roll of LoMo (or Ackley). BTW, if one of you guys has a voodoo doll, could you get a little mojo going for a Bloomquist hammy pull?3 days 4 hours ago

SABR Matt: Moneyball thought - did the Mariners intentionally leave 1B open because it's pretty easy (theoretically) to work a prospect or platoon bat in there when he's hitting enough to merit the call? The media is talking about how big of a gamble it is for Seattle to count on Logan Morrison. I see five guys queued up in line behind him with a legit chance to be productive: Montero, Weeks, Kivlehan, Peterson, Romero.3 days 5 hours ago