How to get inside Perry vs. Schwarzenegger without YouTube

Even though the public won't be able to watch the same-sex marriage trial on YouTube, a remarkable amount of information is being filtered out of the courtroom by both sides of the debate, through Twitter and blogging, as Margaret Talbot in the New Yorker points out.

Photo by Dave Schumaker

The Alliance Defense Fund, which supports Proposition 8, has been ripping through Twitter with dozens of posts a day. Their most recent missive concerned historian George Chauncey, who has been testifying in the case, Perry vs. Schwarzenegger: "Chauncey reluctantly agrees, nothing wrong with considering moral values when voting, pivots to false, tiresome race segregation analogy."

And more: "Chauncey obvious discomfort, Prop8 attorney reads his own words back to him that conflict with dark picture he painted yesterday"Or: "Chauncey struggles to square many statements praising growing acceptance, Day2 testimony was how bad things are for same-sex couples"

Today, the ADF has turned its attention on Twitter itself. The group is complaining that its Tweets are being blocked from the site's search engine. "We can still send updates however Twitter has blocked our updates from showing up in search. They only show up if someone retweet's them." No word from Twitter yet.

Over at the Courage Campaign, which supports same-sex marriages, bloggers are churning out a huge amount of copy from inside the courtroom. The Prop. 8 Trial Tracker features a rotating team of at least five people, including Paul Hogarth, who yesterday posted eight different liveblog posts along with legal analysis.

The blog obviously allows a more lengthy discussion of what's going on, essentially highlighting the high-low meme of the Internet: You get quick hits and sometimes meaningless Twitter feeds (from both sides) followed by extremely detailed accounts. There's not much in the middle.

Thompson: 'Spring 2004 was a decisive turning point in public opinion on gay marriage, correct? It’s hard to think of any group whose opinion has changed more quickly, correct?'

Based on the line of questioning, they’re clearly trying to show how “radical” treating same-sex couples equally — that it’s a recent phenomenon. It’s a bit surreal listening to it, because anyone must ask — why is quick change towards acceptance bad thing? But the courts are an inherently conservative institution (conservative with a small “c.”) You don’t win a case in court by arguing innovative ideas; you argue based upon precedent, so that Judges can feel safe knowing that what they’re doing is consistent. Interestingly, however, two of the most noteworthy and landmark Court rulings — Brown v. Board of Education and Roe v. Wade — read very differently from most cases, because they rely a lot less on precedent than upon sociological data.

In the New Yorker today, Talbot the offers her own analysis of the Tweeting and blogging at Perry vs. Schwarzenegger, and the Chauncey testimony this week:

The truth is this is a tough balancing act: Chauncey has to support the argument that gays are politically weak and that public opinion is not in favor of marriage—comparative political powerlessness is one of the criteria that qualifies a group as a “suspect class” and triggers strict scrutiny of laws singling them out. But at the same time, he must at least acknowledge some of the obvious evidence to the contrary. (Today, he was asked if it was true that Nancy Pelosi was an ally for gay Americans.)

Then again, it puts the pro-Prop lawyers in a peculiar position, too: they’ve got to say, in this context, that public opinion is swinging towards acceptance of gay rights, while making the larger point, over the course of the trial, that were the court to declare bans on same-sex marriage unconstitutional, it would be stepping way out ahead of public opinion.

For now, words are going to have to suffice for monitoring the trial. The U.S. Supreme Court this week blocked any taping for YouTube, a decision that Emily Bazelon at Slate calls awful and heavy-handed.

Plaintiffs requested that the campaign produce internal documents that relate to the purpose and intent of the amendment and the development of political messages during the campaign. The Proposition 8 proponents objected to the request because of the potential chilling effect on political speech, among other grounds
wow gold

Another very strong and powerful post. I've been reading through some of your previous posts and finally decided to drop a comment on this one. I signed up for your newsletter, so please keep up the informative posts! muscle building

There are certainly a lot of details like that to take into consideration. That’s a great point to bring up. I offer the thoughts above as general inspiration but clearly there are questions like the one you bring up where the most important thing will be working in honest good faith. I don’t know if best practices have emerged around things like that, but I am sure that your job is clearly identified as a fair game.
free beauty tips

Schwarzenegger is a great governor to my mind. I love people who are born not for politics but they can hear the society and make some nice decisions. I love that Arnold was involved in the shooting of freshest Stallone movie. You know everyone is chilling and it is really great. I love that. I hope that he will serve for many years for us. I am living in Vermont but I would definitely wish to move in California. Thanks for the great article by the way.

Glad to see another Schwarzenegger supporter. I've noticed that liberals are especially vocal about what they don't like and make assumption about atypical guys like Schwarzenegger and blame everything on him. It's quite ridiculous! I'm writing this on my wireless internet for laptops

The 2 of us genuinely enjoyed your article. It seems like you've put a lot of effort into your article & the public need practically more of these on the Net these days. I do not truly have a good deal to say in retort, I just wanted to comment to tell well done. wonderful post. i never think of that.
Regards,Jason Smith
Researcher of celebrity phone numbers

At 1st, I’d prefer to tell thanks to you for this enlightening post. Second, I had prefer to question wherever I can attain greater data regarding your article. I just came here via Ask and can't check any associated web internet sites on this matter. How do I sign for your web blog? I'd prefer to adhere to your updates as they arrive along! I'd a query to interrogate but I forgot what it absolutely was... anyways, thanx.
Yours, Ray Cruz
Author of how to cook beef tenderloin

The Proposition 8 proponents objected to the request because of the potential chilling effect on political speech,I just wanted to comment to tell well done. wonderful post. i never think of that.
ralph tops

It is a very sticky post to read about the article 'how to get inside Perry vs Schwarzenegger with youtube.' Since, the subject of the discussion is so important and has so far reaching implications, that it is difficult to predict the outcome and there onward. thanks. just married flip flops

precious materials and the fashion house's traditional colours and designs the Bell Ross collection reflects the essential spirit of the brand impassioned study and knowledge of symbols, materials and stones as well as it precision of Swiss Bell Ross Watches and sophistication of Italian fine jewellery. These features are clearly expressed in this Destiny Spirit Replica Bell Ross . The pioneer of touch technology - Tissot recently has launched a T-Touch watch application for the iPhone. This Tissot T-Touch Expert Replica Bell Ross Watches comes with 15 functions,

Your post will be rather good, and I’m sure some will find it interesting because it’s about a topic that’s as widely discussed as others. Some may even find it useful.Thanks so much for your post.
Poker Teacher

hi its seems like you have done a hard work on it. I have got lots of information from your post. Really appreciate your work.!! It was describe very nicely keep us doing good work..
www.dealsourcedirect.com

I think it's only natural that the Perry vs. Schwarzenegger trial is documented live over twitter. I'm sure that a few years from now, most of the open trials will be on live broadcast over the web. Coco Ezsaver