News and Facts for Concerned Americans

Home page for Members of the Educate America
Foundation
and The Third Mechanized Information Militia of The United States

Achievement, enterprise and the entrepreneur spirit have always
been a unique hallmark of our country. We have been allowing ourselves to be slammed down and are literally giving
that unique heritage away. We must build back our manufacturing base, allow business and ideas to prosper again and
shred the controlling and destructive taxation, litigation and regulation strangling free enterprise.

Remember who America was, is and can become. It must be reflective of our Godly heritage, miraculous constitution,
bill of rights, our own history and achievement.

It is incumbent upon each of us to seriously ponder our future. It
is imperative that each of us be willing to study, once again, the great principles upon which this country was
built. Such a study demands that we re-familiarize ourselves with the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.

We must re-read our Declaration of Independence. We must read the words of wisdom and warnings delivered by our
Founding Fathers. In short, we must be completely familiar with the principles of liberty, because those principles
made us, and only those principles will keep us.

We must teach these basics to our children, for the public schools have a different
agenda. While parents, schools, provinces and states across North America bicker about the democratic process
of running public schools, forces are manipulating education from behind the scenes. Major international players
are reshaping public education to suit their own self-serving agendas, without regard for the wants of parents and
the welfare of their children. Today's schools dumb down kids deliberately, making zombie-like people who
don't ask any questions but just follow orders.

SOME OFFICIAL DEFINITIONS TO HELP UNDERSTAND AMERICA.

The fourth section of the fourth article of the constitution, directs that "the United States shall
guaranty to every state in the Union a republican form of government." The form of government is to be
guaranteed, which supposes a form already established, and this is the republican form of government the United
States have undertaken to protect.

REPUBLIC:

A government in the republican form; a government of the people; it is usually put in opposition to a
monarchical or aristocratic government, and certainly not a democracy. Its purpose is to control The Majority
strictly, as well as all others among the people, primarily to protect The Individual's God-given, unalienable
rights and therefore for the protection of the rights of all minorities, and the liberties of the people in
general. The definition of a Republic is: a constitutionally limited government of the representative type,
created by a written Constitution - adopted by the people and changeable (from its original meaning) by them only
by its amendment - with its powers divided between three separate Branches: Executive, Legislative and
Judicial.

DEMOCRACY:

That form of government in which the sovereign power is exercised by the people in a body, as was the practice
in some of the states of Ancient Greece; the term representative democracy has been given incorectly to a
republican government like that of the United States. The exercise is usually accomplished by free and fair voting
and/or consensus.

In both the Direct type and the Representative type of Democracy, The Majority's power is absolute and
unlimited; its decisions are unappealable under the legal system established to give effect to this form of
government. This opens the door to unlimited Tyranny-by-Majority. (Mob Rule.) This was what The Framers of the
United States Constitution meant in 1787, in debates in the Federal (framing) Convention, when they condemned the
"excesses of democracy" and abuses under any Democracy of the unalienable rights of The
Minority and The Individual by The Majority.

COMPARISON:

These two forms of government: Democracy and Republic, are not only dissimilar but antithetical, reflecting the
sharp contrast between (a) The Majority Unlimited, in a Democracy, lacking any legal safeguard of the
rights of The Individual and The Minority, and (b) The Majority Limited, in a Republic, under a written
Constitution safeguarding the rights of The Individual and The Minority. This is the key difference in the core
position of the Republican and Democratic Parties that so many people seem to forget, and that the parties
themselves allow to be obscured by those seeking only more power instead of supporting and defending the
Constitution of the United States of America which is their oath of office.

CONCLUSION:

Democracy, as a form of government, is utterly repugnant to (is the very antithesis of) the traditional
American system: that of a Constitutional Republic, and its underlying philosophy, as expressed in essence in the
Declaration of Independence with primary emphasis upon the people's forming their government so as to permit
them to possess only "just powers" (limited powers) in order to make and keep secure the God-given,
unalienable rights of each and every Individual and therefore of all groups of Individuals. The first genuine and
soundly founded Republic in all history was the one created by the first genuine Constitution, which was adopted
by the people of Massachusetts in 1780 after being framed for their consideration by a specially chosen
Constitutional Convention. In 1787-1788, the United States Constitution was framed by the Federal Convention for
the people's consideration and then ratified by the people of the several States through a Ratifying
Convention in each State specially chosen by them for this sole purpose. Thereafter the other States gradually
followed in general the Massachusetts pattern of Constitution-making in adoption of a genuine Constitution.

" No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when
knowledge is diffused and virtue is preserved. On the contrary, when people are universally ignorant, and
debauched in their manners, they will sink under their own weight without the aid of foreign invaders.
" --Samuel Adams, letter to James Warren, 1775

" Those that do not heed their history will be doomed to relive it. But, to heed their own
history, they must first be knowledgeable of it. The words of our forefathers must not be taken lightly for as
then, it is true now, to heed them is the only key to our liberty. " --John Beaman, email to his
children, 2009

"The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to
create whatever the form of government, a real despotism. A just estimate of that love of power, and proneness to
abuse it, which predominates in the human heart is sufficient to satisfy us of the truth of this position."
--George Washington

"What is to be the consequence, in case the Congress shall misconstrue this part [the necessary and proper
clause] of the Constitution and exercise powers not warranted by its true meaning, I answer the same as if they
should misconstrue or enlarge any other power vested in them...the success of the usurpation will depend on the
executive and judiciary departments, which are to expound and give effect to the legislative acts; and in a last
resort a remedy must be obtained from the people, who can by the elections of more faithful representatives,
annul the acts of the usurpers." --James Madison

"Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind." --Albert Einstein"The hardest thing to understand in the world is the income tax. --Albert Einstein

Obama is still Clueless - Or actually hates America

Summary: Obama's 2011 State of the Union Message

Sen. Rand Paul: State of the Union Response

Another DUH! moment for all to ponder.

What do the ten US cities with the highest poverty rate all
have in common?

Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961.

Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1954.

Cincinnati, OH (3rd) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1984.

Cleveland, OH (4th) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1989.

Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican mayor.

St. Louis, MO (6th) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1949.

El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican mayor.

Milwaukee, WI (8th) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1908.

Philadelphia, PA (9th) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1952.

Newark, NJ (10th) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1907.

More Government 'wisdom'?
or, more Harry Reid Treason.

"If people let the government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they
take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under
tyranny."
-- Thomas Jefferson

Bill S510: Ultimate Government Control Over What We Eat

On November 30, 2010 the US Senate passed bill S510, the Food Safety Modernization Act, giving more
government control over what we eat.

In a vote of 73 - 25 the US Senate passed bill S510 today giving the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
more power to police food. The bill was designed to maintain stricter standards in keeping food safe, but also
has a few other things in mind.

The bill also increases funding for the FDA, increases FDA inspections, enhances surveillance systems, ensures
to protect the food supply against terrorism, and grants the U.S. government new authority over the
public's right to grow, trade and transport any foods.

The new bill gives companies such as Monsanto the power to monopolize US seed, food supplements, food and
farming. It puts US food and farms under the Department of Homeland Security. It ends US sovereignty over
its own food supply. It would also allow the government to mandate antibiotics, hormones, slaughterhouse
waste, pesticides and genetically modified organisms.

"If accepted it would preclude the public's right to grow, own, trade, transport, share, feed and
eat each and every food that nature makes. It will become the most offensive authority against the
cultivation, trade and consumption of food and agricultural products of one's choice. It will be
unconstitutional and contrary to natural law or, if you like, the will of God."
-- Dr. Shiv Chopra

Great compromise by Washington, off the cliff....

"Conservatism and responsible government won a resounding victory in November's
elections, and yet just a month later, we're witnessing legislative arrogance on a scale you wouldn't
expect if voters had ratified the ruling class' sprint toward national bankruptcy. Can you imagine how it
would be acting if it hadn't received a 'shellacking'? It seems that Washington is embracing all
the principles and practices the voters soundly rejected, without the slightest indication it either received
the message or cares. Are we seeing any evidence of greater transparency, a rejection of earmarks, budgetary
restraint or legislative deliberation?" --columnist David Limbaugh

If you are not upset, then you are not paying attention.

I guess this was just
another crime against the people for a new voting block?
Clinton got the DADT passed on his watch, guess that doesn't mean anything?

"The U.S. military, already strained by wars in
Afghanistan and Iraq, faces transformation from the world's most powerful fighting machine into an
organization where political correctness is more important than victory. Saturday's Senate vote cleared
the final hurdle for the repeal of President Clinton's 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy
designed to prevent homosexual conduct in the ranks. Battle lines will now form over how the homosexual
advocacy policies will be implemented. Though the repudiated lawmakers who rammed the repeal through this
weekend's session pretend they are simply latter-day Rosa Parkses seeking to end discrimination, there is
no comparison. Since 2005, a mere 1 percent of Army discharges involved homosexual conduct. This issue
isn't about retaining or recruiting qualified personnel for the military. This is part of the Left's
larger societal goal of using government to force others to embrace unorthodox personal lifestyle choices. The
implications are clear from a look at how the federal government treats issues of homosexuality. ... Troops
can look forward to so-called pride parades on military bases and awareness days for the transgendered.
Everyone knows the sort of thing that might work in Greenwich Village or a San Francisco neighborhood
doesn't go over well in a fighting force drawn largely from red state America -- an area whose residents
Mr. Obama once derisively referred to as the type who 'cling to guns or religion.' That's why
implementing the New Gay Army means forcing soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines to endure
'diversity' training. Those who don't like it will be told to get out, as several senior military
leaders have suggested already. Chaplains in particular will face the dilemma that preaching their faith will
violate the new pro-homosexual code of conduct. As a result, far more are likely to leave or be thrown out of
the military as a result of Mr. Obama's policy than were ever affected by Mr. Clinton's. It's hard
to see how that will do anything to strengthen the nation's defenses." --The Washington Times

I herby Announce the new name for the Democratic party:

The so-called Democratic Party will further be known as:
" The Potrzebie Party "
Seems fitting since they promote socialism, and Obama sure
appealed to the Potrzebie people of this country. Too bad
we all got so little for their Potrzebie voting attitudes.
The word is pronounced [poterzbje] in Polish, and is a declined
form of the noun "potrzeba" (which means "need", or "want").
Potrzebie was popularized by its non-sequitur use as a running
gag in the early issues of Mad Magazine not long after the comic
book began in 1952. The definition of 'need' and 'want', which
seemes perfectly appropriate for the Democrats.
In addition, the thread of the old polish jokes, always told as
a stereotypical indication of ignorance and stupidity, that ran
heavy in the 60's also seems to be a fitting hidden meaning as well.
Not sure how many people will get it. But, I think it's appropriate.
Heck, if they want to call Republicans such a hateful and totally
inapplicable word such as Nazis, (German gutter slang meaning to
nationalize, which fits them better), we could certainly call them
the much kinder "Potrzebies", with all it's hidden meanings and the
appropriate alligations and insinuations embedded therein.
- John Beaman - September 1st 2010
Webmaster: http://w3f.com/patriots

Wake up America. Our value is being stolen by the government. Do the math.

Tolerance and the Ground Zero Mosque

Mosque leaders issue statements such as:

"Islam is the religion of peace,"
"Islam respects freedom of religion,"
"Islam is the religion that gave them their rights," or
"Islam is not anti-Semitic."

I disagree.

1. Islamic law (Shariah) states that Muslims who convert to Christianity must be killed (Redda Law), women in
adulterous relationships must be stoned to death, men can beat their wives to discipline them, and homosexuals
should be killed.

2. Several Muslim texts declare that Jews are pigs and monkeys and that killing Jews before "end
days" is a religious duty for Muslims.

3. Muslim texts that are approved by all the schools of jurisprudence in Islam (Shafeii, Hanbali, Maleki, and
Hanafi) state that Muslims must declare wars against all non-Muslims to spread Islam and those they conquer
must either convert to Islam, pay Jizya (a humiliating tax), or be killed.

Someone needs to tell them no. We don't want a Mosque at Ground Zero as they will claim the final victory
over The United States with their trophy of legal invasion.

Obama claims to have been a Muslim but is now a Christian? I suggest you re-read #1 above, and tell me that if
he is really a Christian, why is he still alive? .

Why is Obama promoting the Mosque at/near ground zero?
It is because Obama is still a Muslim.

DOH!

Too easy to figure out people.

According to the teachings of Obama's true faith, anyone converting to Christianity must be put to death.
So, I ask, has he really converted to become a Christian? Hardly, he is still alive, isn't he?

Obama is not a Christian, or even an American. Can't be. Not according to the way he has been destroying
this country, it's people, and its Constitution. Just like what many Muslims are doing and claiming that
their faith tells them it is the right thing for them to do while they commit crimes against our country.
They believe so strongly in what will be preached in this mosque, that they have become Kamikaze's on
innocent women and children to show proof of their faith in that doctrine.

This Mosque will be an obvious trophy to all those that promote, support, and believe the teachings of what
will be preached in that mosque. All around the world, you will not hear America praised for it's
tolerance, but at their trophy of success in winning their war against the infidels. I say all those
Americans that facilitate it, in any way, are traitors committing treason against their own country. Obama
included. Treason is punishable by death.

What kind of fool cannot see this to be so freakin' obvious?

Only those that are paid to comply in the systematic downfall of America with money or favors that are
supporting this project. That makes them all guilty of treason as well. Including the governor, the mayor,
and any company or union that provides resources to build that mosque. The owner of the property is a true
traitor to his neighbors and the whole country if he sells or makes that property available to the enemies of
all civilized people.

The definition of appeasement is feeding a crocodile in the hopes it will eat you last. The definition of
insanity is doing the same crap over and over hoping eventually you will get a different result eventually.
Being PC is insanity. If you don't believe that, then do the PC thing and see if the croc doesn't
eats you. The problem is, not just you, but that croc will also eat my children and grandchildren, and
that's whay I call being PC a crock, and those enabling this obamanation nothing short of being guilty of
treason.

Wake up people, this cannot be allowed if you expect America to ever be the great nation it once was.

Section 9006 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) will amend the Internal
Revenue Code to expand the scope of Form 1099. Currently, 1099 forms are used to track and report the
miscellaneous income associated with services rendered by independent contractors or self-employed
individuals.

Starting Jan. 1, 2012, Form 1099s will become a means of reporting to the Internal Revenue Service the
purchases of all goods and services by small businesses and self-employed people that exceed $600 during a
calendar year. Precious metals such as coins and bullion fall into this category and coin dealers have
been among those most rankled by the change.

This provision, intended to mine what the IRS deems a vast reservoir of uncollected income tax, was
included in the health care legislation ostensibly as a way to pay for it.

So every time a member of the public sells more than $600 worth of gold to a dealer, [Diane Piret,
industry affairs director for the Industry Council for Tangible Assets, a trade association representing
an estimated 5,000 coin and bullion dealers in the U.S.] said, the transaction will have to be reported to
the government by the buyer.

Gold does not rise or fall in value very much. Fact is, an ounce of gold has been able to purchase
roughly the same goods for thousands of years.

In contrast, the US dollar is worth less than 1% of its value in 1913 when the blatantly unconstitutional
FederalReserve was created.

Therefore, ALL taxes of "capital gains" are FRAUD perpetrated by government, because the claim of
"profit" is based upon the "dollar", which decreases in value.

Gold is a good example. In 1933, you could trade a $20 dollar bill for a one ounce gold like the "the
$20 gold piece"... duh. Today, you must trade $1250 dollars to get a one ounce gold coin.
Since one ounce of gold buys roughly the same goods as in 1933, no REAL profit is made by holding gold.
However, since the predators at the FederalReserve constantly and purposely DESTROY the value of the dollar
(even though their assigned mission is to assure the value is maintained), they claim you made a profit of
$1230 on the one ounce gold coin, and tax you 25% (or so, depending on situation). This is THEFT...
pure, unadulterated THEFT.

They created this FICTIONAL profit by destroying the value of the dollar. After a given coin (or any
item) is sold a few times, they tax more than 100% of the value of the item (10% to 25% each time)...
effectively stealing more than the value of the item itself!

So, How do you like the CHANGE? Ready for 2 more years of this shit?

The predators-that-be must be arrested, tried and hung for 100 years of treason, crimes against humanity,
destruction, racketeering, slavery and endless other obscene crimes. Wake up humans, wake up!

This quote was translated into English from an article appearing in the Czech Republic as published in
the Prager Zeitung of 28 April 2010.

"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the
Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore
the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their
president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what
ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools
that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a
fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their
president."

Like I have said for a long time... "The dumbing down of America has been a
resounding success." - JB

"We who live in free market societies believe that growth, prosperity and ultimately human
fulfillment, are created from the bottom up, not the government down. Only when the human spirit is allowed to
invent and create, only when individuals are given a personal stake in deciding economic policies and
benefitting from their success - only then can societies remain economically alive, dynamic, progressive, and
free. Trust the people. This is the one irrefutable lesson of the entire postwar period contradicting the
notion that rigid government controls are essential to economic development." --Ronald Reagan

" No man can well doubt the propriety of placing a president
of the United States under the most solemn obligations to
preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution." --Joseph Story

"We live in a Constitutional Republic. The President's job under the Constitution is to enforce
the laws made by the elected Congress. His job is not to create new laws and enforce them all by himself. His
job is as magistrate under the Constitution, not as Caudillo (military dictator). He is not the law. He is
supposed to enforce what Congress decides. The BP behavior is reminiscent of how, immediately after assuming
office, Mr. Obama, with no Congressional authority or administrative allowance, simply made a phone call to
fire the head of GM. When I called the White House press office to ask under what law or regulation Mr. Obama
was acting, I was told he did not need a law. If the government put a lot of money into GM, it could call the
shots at GM, I was told. But under what authority, I asked. 'None needed,' was the final answer. ...
The same goes for Mr. Obama's demand that BP pay the lost wages of oil and gas workers suspended from work
because of the moratorium on Gulf of Mexico underseas drilling. There simply was no legislation allowing this
kind of specific demand. Mr. Obama's demand was in the nature of a threat, more than a Constitutional act.
... To create specific enactments and actions without any authority - now Mr. Obama's specialty - is so at
odds with the law of the land that it terrifies me. These are not the acts of a teacher on Constitutional law.
These are the acts of a big city boss or a third world dictator." - Ben Stein

Arizona's SB 1070 is
Constitutional!

Article 4, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution states
that our government "shall guarantee" to every state
in this Union a Republican form of government and
shall protect each of them against invasion.

Mr. Obama, when are you going to see that our laws are enforced?
When are the Democrats going to understand we are a REPUBLIC, and NOT a democracy? To claim otherwise is
treason, and the name of their party proves it to me.

The Obama administration just refuses to take no as an answer to its desire to control the Internet.

Just a month ago, the Federal Appeals Court for the District of Columbia unanimously ruled that the FCC
didn't have the power to regulate traffic on the Internet. It seemed pretty clear, but last Thursday FCC
Chairman Julius Genachowski announced a new plan: redefine broadband services to be something it can regulate,
in this case telephone services.

This is like a kid being told not he has to eat their "green beans" and then claiming that the
"cookies" are really "green beans." The Obama administration has very sticky fingers and
doesn't seem embarrassed by this power grab. The notion that the government can redefine things to extend
its power is pretty scary.

This distinction between telecommunications and broadband is quite clear. Congress made the distinction
clear in the 1996 Communications Act.

Nothing in that act gives the FCC authority to decide on its own what is and what is not a
telecommunications service. Indeed, the broadband Internet is defined in the act as an unregulated
"information service."

Since Congress acted, the FCC under both Democratic and Republican leadership have strongly argued that
broadband Internet and telecommunication services are not the same thing and were never meant to be the
same.

The Obama administration wants Americans to trust their bureaucrats with this massive new power. But in
their ideal world, federal agencies, not Congress, decide what the federal agencies can regulate.

Forget the basics of our Constitution, where there is a balance of power between the three branches of
government.

All they need is a "good reason" for these new regulations. Right now their immediate goal is to
regulate what prices can be charged for Internet services, so-called "Net neutrality," something
which will harm consumers in order to help favored companies such as Google.

But it doesn't take much imagination to see where these regulations can lead. Take the power of the FCC
to levy fines for obscene language. Might the FCC want to reclassify cable programming so that it can impose
the same fines on HBO and Showtime that it now imposes on over-the-air broadcasts?

Surely, if the federal government can provide a "good reason" to reclassify broadband services as
telecommunications, if can come up with a "good reason" to prevent such bad language.

Take the "fairness" doctrine, a rule created during the 1940s requiring that broadcast stations
give equal time to both sides of controversial issues.

In 1987, Ronald Reagan got rid of this regulation. To silence right-wing criticism, the Obama
administration is already trying to reimpose a version of the fairness doctrine on broadcast stations.

We can imagine how the Obama administration or some future administration might want to use these same
powers to regulate - read silence - the information on the Web by extending a fairness doctrine to the
Internet.

Neither President Obama nor his political appointees can unilaterally rewrite laws no matter how
"good" of a reason that they think they have.

If this change were allowed, it will be a truly major increase in executive branch power. The only
thing more worrisome is that President Obama's judicial appointments might let them get away with
this.

Gee whiz, wonder who is lying to the people?

Words always mean something. Correct usage is important.

During the past few years in the American
press, the Democrats have frequently denounced the Republicans as Nazis, most famously by Hillary, in their
attempts to control runaway federal spending. How very ironic. Some people remember the Nazis. Let me share a
little about the Nazis and some of their exploits.

First of all, "Nazi" was gutter slang for the verb "to nationalize". The Bider-Mienhoff
gang gave themselves this moniker during their early struggles. The official title of the Nazi Party was
"The National Socialist Workers Party of Germany". Hitler and the Brownshirts advocated the
nationalization of education, health care, transportation, national resources, manufacturing, distribution and
law enforcement.

Hitler came to power by turning the working class, unemployed, and academic elite against the conservative
republic. After Der Fuhrer's election ceased being a political conspiracy and was transformed into a
fashionable social phenomenon, party membership was especially popular with educators, bureaucrats, and the
press.

Being a Nazi was "politically correct". They called themselves "The Children of the New Age
of World Order" and looked down their noses at everyone else. As Hitler acquired more power, he referred
to his critics as "The Dark Forces of Anarchy and Hatred".

Anyone who questioned Nazi high-handedness in the German press was branded a "Conservative
Reactionary". Joseph Goebbels, minister of communications, proclaimed a "New World Order".

Sound familiar? Get the picture yet?

Obama has no clue..... Again!

Sunday, 09 May 2010 11:27 PM

Obama Administration Targets Military for Pay Reductions

President Barack Obama - who came to power with the help of government employee unions across the nation
and has lavished on them hundreds of billions in stimulus funds to keep them on federal, state and local
payrolls with no strings attached - is moving to cut spending on salaries for military personnel.

The Obama administration is "pleading" with Congress to give military personnel a much smaller
increase in pay than lawmakers have proposed.

For example, the military brass claims that an average sergeant in the Army with four years of service and
one dependent would receive $52,589 in annual compensation, according to the paper. This figure includes basic
pay, housing, and subsistence allowances, as well as tax benefits.

Meanwhile, a U.S. postal letter carrier, with no supervisory nor hazardous duty, makes approximately
$80,000 a year when all benefits are factored in.

According to the Defense undersecretary of personnel and readiness, last year was the militarys most
successful recruiting year since the establishment of the all-volunteer force in 1973. That might be where
many of Obama's job's-gained figures are coming from, for those who seek employment in the military
because they can't find a domestic job?

Congressional supporters of the men and women in the Armed Services are questioning why they are being
singled out for future pay cutbacks when other government agencies and unions are getting increases. The U.S.
Postal Service, for example, is slated to give letter carriers, who make 30% more than our servicemen, an
increase of 1.9 percent this coming year.

"Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important
matters." -- Albert Einstein

More lies. Twice in 10 days, this one to The New York Times on April 18, Obama claimed his pledge was to
not raise taxes applied only to income taxes. In his April 10 Weekly Radio Address, Obama said: "And
one thing we have not done is raise income taxes on families making less than $250,000. That's another
promise we've kept."

Uh, people making less than 250k would have an additional 5% tax on everything they buy, reducing their net
income, as if the inflation you have created has not cost them enough already, 20% since January 1st. Is he
really that stupid, or does he even care? I wonder.

"President Barack Obama's economic team is already calculating government revenues from a
possible value added tax (VAT)", according to The New York Times. "In the interest of
transparency, Americans for Tax Reform respectfully asks President Obama to immediately release the reported
VAT calculations or deny such calculations exist." What respect? What transparency when he has
hidden all of his documents and papers. Even Bo, his dog, has valid papers. Obama does not. If he did, why
hide them all? His pledge for transparency during his campaign was nothing but a big fat lie. It is obvious he
never intended to honor that promise.

Well, It seems that Obama is proving once again what a complete liar he is. He has broken promise after
promise, and I personally am getting sick of this userper screwing the people he keeps making promises to. It
seems that only their vote to get in, to totally destroy our once great country, was his motive for all the
campaign lies. But then this was obvious to anyone that looked at his Chicago/mob roots. His pledge for
transparency has been shattered numerous times since taking office, so I don't know why anyone would think
this pathological liar would do anything different on this issue of taxes either. Maybe the press is starting
to learn that backing him was a horrendous mistake, when they could have exposed him for what many of us
already knew what he really was/is, and warned everyone we could, but onto deaf ears.

"One way to reach their 3 percent goal, by the calculations of Mr. Obama's economic team: a 5
percent value-added tax, which would generate enough revenue to simultaneously permit the reduction in
corporate tax rates."

It would seem to me that this value added tax (VAT) would be unconstitutional. The Federal Government
cannot put a tax on the people unless proportioned. (same dollars/person) Or, to tax a federally controlled
activity, of which the buying of goods and services by its citizens, here in this country, in their own state,
is NOT one of them.

That's it, Barry, now you propose to tax all the people so you can give favors to big business,
something you repeatedly claimed to be against. The Democrats illusion of being for the poor and the working
man is hereby shattered for ever. You cannot be trusted. (As though anyone will actually believed anything you
ever say any more.)

The man is a traitor to the office in which he gets 3 more years to screw us all even more. I just wish
more of the ignorant voters had listened to those of us that did their homework on this liar and thief,
instead of just laughing at our research results. For he is stealing our once great country right from under
under our noses. How can anyone approve of this mans record in office? To support his actions is either blind
stupidity, chosen ignorance, or a desire to destroy America.

Don't anyone ever tell me again that the Democrats or Obama are for the little guy. For I will call you
a liar too, because you know better now. What pray tell, will he do to us with almost 3 more years in office?
3 times the current damage?

It is getting really scary.

I once warned: "History has proven that you cannot tax a country into prosperity, only into
slavery." I then added: "And, would you believe it took a black man as president to turn us
all into slaves."

I told you so..... I just never thought it would get this bad, this fast.

Be afraid, be very afraid.

Hey America. Heads up, Obama is raping us!

Jon Voigt - April 10th, 2010 Fox News video transcript:

"In one year, the American people are witnessing the greatest lie that is cleverly orchestrated by
President Obama and his whole administration. The lie is a potent aggression that feeds the needs of people
who either have not educated themselves enough to understand the assault upon us all or the very poor and
needy who live to be taken care of.

President Obama feeds these people poison, giving them the idea that they are entitled to take from the
wealthier who have lived and worked in a democracy that understands that capitalism is the only truth that
keeps a nation healthy and fed. Now the lie goes very deep and President Obama has been cleverly trained in
the Alinsky method and it would be very important that every American knows what that method is.

It is a socialistic, Marxist teaching and with it, little by little, he rapes this nation, taking down our
defenses, making new language for the Islamic extremists. The world looked up to us as a symbol of hope and
prosperity now wonders what will become of the entire world if America is losing its power.

The American people who understand exactly what is taking place have come together in the thousands, vowing
to try to stay together as a unit of love and freedom for all men and women, from all walks of life, shivering
to think that this once great nation will be a third world country.

This will be the first president to ever weaken the United States of America. President Obama uses his
aggression and arrogance for his own agenda, against the will of the American people when he should be using
his will and aggression against our enemies.

Every loving American for peace and truth and the security of our nation must come out and join the Tea
Parties in their states. The opposition will continue their tactics; they will lie and plant their own bullies
amongst us. Everyone must pay close attention to who stands next to them. We can weed out the liars and
agitators.

Let us all stay in Gods light. Let no man put asunder. We can and we will prevail. God bless us
all!"

The "Alinsky method" that Voigt refers to is the teachings of American community organizer
and writer Saul Alinsky (a Chicago Community Organizer, like Obama). In his final book called "Rules for
Radicals" Alinsky stated in the opening paragraph:

"What follows is for those who want to change the world from what it is to what they believe it should
be. The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold power. 'Rules for Radicals' is
written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away."

Gee, seems Obama is bound and determined to take America away... DUH!

I hope everyone knows how to swim....

Obama is single-handily turning the United states from the very best, into an also-ran country. All
that work and treasure for decades to secure our safety is in the toilet, swirling down, out of sight....
-jb

"Under the old doctrine, supported by every president of both parties for decades, any aggressor ran
the risk of a cataclysmic U.S. nuclear response that would leave the attacking nation a cinder and a
memory.

Credible? Doable? No one knows. But the threat was very effective. Under President Obama's new policy,
however, if the state that has just attacked us with biological or chemical weapons is 'in compliance with
the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT),' explained Gates, then 'the U.S. pledges not to use or threaten to
use nuclear weapons against it.' ...

This is quite insane. If a terrorist deliberately uses his car to mow down a hundred people waiting at a
bus stop, the decision as to whether he gets (a) hanged or (b) 100 hours of community service hinges entirely
on whether his car had passed emissions inspections.

Apart from being morally bizarre, the Obama policy is strategically loopy. Does anyone believe that North
Korea or Iran will be more persuaded to abjure nuclear weapons because they could then carry out a biological
or chemical attack on the U.S. without fear of nuclear retaliation?" --columnist Charles Krauthammer

It's Official - America Now Enforces Capital Controls

On March 18, with very little pomp and circumstance, president Obama passed the most recent
stimulus act, the $17.5 billion Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act (H.R. 2487), brilliantly goalseeked
by the administration's millionaire cronies to abbreviate as HIRE.

As it was merely the latest in an endless stream of acts destined to expand the government payroll to infinity,
nobody cared about it, or actually read it. Because if anyone had read it, the act would have been known
as the Capital Controls Act, as one of the lesser, but infinitely more important provisions on page 27, known
as Offset Provisions - Subtitle A - Foreign Account Tax Compliance, institutes just that.

In brief, the Provision requires that foreign banks not only withhold 30% of all outgoing capital flows (likely
remitting the collection promptly back to the US Treasury) but also disclose the full details of non-exempt
account-holders to the US and the IRS. And should this provision be deemed illegal by a given foreign
nation's domestic laws (think Switzerland), well the foreign financial institution is required to close the
account. It's now the law. If you thought you could move your capital to the non-sequestration
safety of non-US financial institutions, sorry you lose - the law now says so. Capital Controls are now
here and are now fully enforced by the law. (MORE)

This 'just passed law' has been mentioned by exactly zero mainstream media
outlets.

Talk about going backwards....

"A few weeks ago, The New York Times ran an editorial noting the amazing fact that, by
the middle of this year, there will be an estimated 6.8 billion people on Earth - and 5 billion will have cell
phones!

How did that happen without a Democrat president and Congress using bribes, parliamentary tricks and arcane
non-voting maneuvers to pass a massive, hugely expensive National Cell Phone Reform Act? How did that happen
without Barney Frank and Henry Waxman personally designing the 3-foot-long, 26-pound, ugly green $4,000 cell
phone we all have to use?

How did that happen without Obama signing the National Cell Phone Reform bill, as a poor 10-year-old black kid
who couldn't afford to text-message his friends looked on?

The reason nearly everyone in the universe has a cell phone is that President Reagan did to telephones the
exact opposite of what the Democrats have just done with health care. Before Reagan came into office, we had
one phone company, ridiculously expensive rates and one phone model. Reagan split up AT&T, deregulated
phone service and gave America a competitive market in phones. The rest is history.

If you can grasp how inexpensive cell phones in a rainbow of colors and wonders like the iPhone could never
have been created under a National Cell Phone Reform Act, you can understand what a disaster ObamaCare is going
to be for health care in America." - columnist Ann Coulter

Obama doesn't even listen to his own CBO information.

So, what is the impact on the deficit when the Senate health care bill, the reconciliation
bill to fix the Senate health care bill and the bill to fix the phantom reductions in doctors' fees are all
considered together? ... 'Obamas's own CBO estimates that enacting all three pieces of legislation
would add $59 billion to budget deficits over the 2010-2019 period.' Rather than cut the deficit by $1
trillion over two decades as Obama claims, the full health care package increases the deficit by $59 billion
over one decade. ... [T]he bill authorizes new discretionary spending that Congress will need to approve in
future years to make sure the bureaucracies are in place to carry out the new plan. CBO estimates this will
lead to 'at least $50 billion' in new spending over 10 years that was not included in the health care
bill itself. ... Nor should Obama's socialized medicine plan be viewed in isolation from the rest of his
budget. CBO says his fiscal 2011 budget proposal will increase the national debt by $9.8 trillion over the next
10 years. He is running a record $1.5 trillion deficit this year, and the smallest deficit he will ever run is
$724 billion in 2014 - the year his unconstitutional individual insurance mandate kicks in. After that, the
deficit starts an unbroken climb, surpassing $1 trillion again in 2018 and heading ever higher. Just as
Obama's claim that his socialized medicine plan will reduce the deficit by $1 trillion will be his defining
lie, his legacy will be this: He bankrupted America.

The wisdom has been there, but some chose 'Change' instead.

"The fact is, we'll never build a lasting economic recovery by going deeper into debt at a
faster rate than we ever have before. It took this nation 166 years until the middle of World War II to finally
accumulate a debt of $95 billion. It took this [Carter] administration just the last 12 months to add $95
billion to the debt. And the Carter administration has run up almost one-fourth of the total national debt in
just these short 19 months. Inflation is the cause of recession and unemployment. And we're not going to
have real prosperity or recovery until we stop fighting the symptoms and start fighting the disease."
--Ronald Reagan

When will the people start to get it, and get rid of this 'change'?"Obama has replaced "The Worst President" (Carter) and has now taken that throne."
--JRBeaman-2009

March 21st, 2010
Washington, The White House
President Obama signed the U.S health reform Bill into
law today, during a ceremony at the White House.

Conned by the promise of an ephemeral executive order, the last holdouts cave and ObamaCare advances.
It doesn't add a single doctor or hospital room, but needs 17,000 new IRS agents to enforce it. And you
know how I feel about the IRS.

The issues:

The Senate version of the health care overhaul permitted federal funding of abortion through its failure
to expressly prohibit it.

The bill has a $460 billion deficit in the first 10 years, a $1.4 trillion deficit in the second 10
years.

The New England Journal of Medicine just released a survey finding that 46% of primary care physicians
would consider quitting medicine under this bill.

The Internal Revenue Service provision in the bill "dangerously expands, in an ominous way the
tentacles of the IRS and its reach into every American family. The IRS now can make sure everyone buys health
insurance acceptable to the federal government and collect the fines of up to $2,250 per family or 2% of
income if it doesn't. The CBO expects the IRS will need roughly $10 billion over the next 10 years and
nearly 17,000 new employees to meet its new responsibilities under socialized medicine. The American people
will be faced with fines, even possible imprisonment, if they don't comply with this unique federal
mandate. Now an IRS agent will come between you and your doctor. These IRS agents will have the job of
enforcing a new and unconstitutional mandate. The Constitution specifically enumerates the powers given to
each branch of government and says that any power not mentioned revert to the states and to the people.
Nowhere does it say the feds can compel you to buy health insurance.

"The first 10 years of implementation, the total cost of ObamaCare reaches $6.25 trillion.
That's not a precise estimate. It's just far closer to the truth than President Obama and
congressional Democrats want the debate to be." - Cato Institute

Mr. President: Jobs Creation Is Not Rocket Science (State Of The Union)

What could the real, productive American economy do with an extra $109.5 billion?

How about 2,737,500 new jobs paying $40,000 per year?

109,500,000,000 / 40,000 = 2,737,500*

Almost 3 million new jobs. At only 1 dollar per day.

Now, just for fun, multiply x 10.

If it isn't that difficult, why do you think that Washington won't do it?

Could it be that this would also eliminate a problem to fix with bigger government, their real goal of
obtaining more power???? I think so. All legislation by Nancy Palosi and Harry Reed, and sold to us by Obama
and the media (press) obviously indicate this conclusion.

We must take our country back from these socialist power mongers. ASAP!

John Beaman - Editor:
http://www.MADEinUSA.org

Democratic candidates were defeated because the people thought the candidates, like the
leadership of the Democratic Party, were out of touch with the needs of the citizenry. While Republicans
focused on the economy, job creation, deficit reduction and responsibility, Democrats were bogged down - almost
exclusively - on health care, blaming Bush and defending their failed economic policies. ... The Democrats set
forth an agenda that was 180 degrees opposite of what needed to be done and what the American people wanted to
see done. The Democrats manufactured a 'crisis' on health care, when we have an honest to goodness
economic crisis and recession - the worst since the Great Depression. ... The American people are more than
disappointed with the 'change' they got this past year and are worried about their future and the
condition of the economy. But it's not over, the people will continue to let their frustration be known
this coming November in the midterm elections."--Georgetown University professor Bradley Blakeman

Psalms 2009

Obama is the shepherd I did not want.
He leadeth me beside the still factories.
He restoreth my faith in the Republican party.
He guideth me in the path of unemployment for his party's sake.
Yea, though I walk through the valley of the bread line,
I shall fear no hunger, for his bailouts are with me.
He has anointed my income with taxes, My expenses runneth over.
Surely, poverty and hard living will follow me all the days of my life,
And I will live in a mortgaged home forever.
I am glad I am American,
I am glad that I am free.
But I wish I was a dog,
And Obama was a tree.

"The principle of spending money to be paid by posterity,
under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."
--Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Taylor, 1816

"Destroy the family, you destroy the country... Give me
four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown
will never be uprooted..." - Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

The traitors have returned from Washington. It is your duty to
contact these criminal traitors often and ASAP to express your absolute contempt and loathing. Almost
everything they have done is unconstitutional and criminal, they are the Judas Goats for their Progressive,
Marxist, Fascist and Communist leaders in both political parties, the unions, foundations, media, corporations
and directed by the super rich.

Do not threaten or harm the traitors, leave that to their future cell mates.

You must convince these traitors in very plain language that they must quickly repudiate, and reverse what they
have done because the people are going to take back our Republic in 2010 and their actions will determine if it
is accomplished peacefully or with bloodshed.

Remind the traitors that the only legitimate government power is derived from the Constitution which they have
repudiated putting them in a very dangerous position; and anyone who follows their unconstitutional orders are
also guilty of treason.

Obamacare was the last straw and can&#8217;t be allowed to stand. Period.

Frankly, I don&#8217;t care to associate with anyone who knows the truth and refuses to act.

- John Beaman , owner/editor of The Patriots Page.

Will this be Obama's legacy? The rediculous Obamacare package?

There is no majority of American people that believe this bill is sound. There is no
majority of American people that believe this bill is helpful. There is no majority of American people that
believe it will bring down costs. And we've learned from the Congressional Budget office that earliest
estimates indicate they will go up significantly.

Presently, even with all the problems of the uninsured walking into emergency rooms, America provides health
services to everyone within its borders. The cost of how we do it now is roughly 1.3 trillion dollars. The cost
of Obamacare is conservatively estimated at tipping 4 trillion dollars... to cover the exact same number of
people.

His pledge to produce a healed economy and a better jobs picture is equally laughable in that he's made
both worse. For 49 out of 50 states have LOST jobs since the stimulus was passed. And he still continues
promoting illegal immigration.

Now, when poll after poll across America demonstrate that two-thirds of the American people are solidly against
Obamacare, (and who knows if the final third even know anything about it or else that number could easily be
higher), the President(?) has successfully jammed it down American's throats.

And our 'representitives' in Washington, and our safeguard - the press,
keeps pushing it off on us.
Don't you realize that this is the real agenda of Palosi and Reed, as is being sold by Obama?

Want the truth? Look to the facts, not the bull. That's what honest people do.

Hurricane Expert Rips Climate Fears

Tuesday, December 8, 2009 8:10 PM

By: Dr. William Gray

The following commentary is from Atmospheric Scientist and Hurricane forecasting specialist Dr. William Gray.
Gray is the renowned hurricane forecaster and Emeritus Professor of Atmospheric Science at Colorado State
University (CSU) and originally published this article on ClimateDepot.com.

Had I not devoted my entire career of more than half a century to the study and forecasting of meteorological
and climate events, I would have likely been concerned over the possibility of humans causing serious global
climate degradation.

There has been an unrelenting quarter century of one-sided indoctrination of the Western world by the media and
by various scientists and governments concerning a coming carbon dioxide (CO2) induced global warming disaster.
These warming scenarios have been orchestrated by a combination of environmentalists, vested interest
scientists wanting larger federal grants and publicity, the media which profits from doomsday scenario
reporting, governmental bureaucrats who want more power over our lives, and socialists who want to level-out
global living standards. These many alarmist groups appear to have little concern over whether their global
warming prognostications are accurate, however. And they most certainly are not. The alarmists believe they
will be able to scare enough of our citizens into believing their propaganda that the public will be willing to
follow their advice on future energy usage and agree to a lowering of their standard of living in the name of
climate salvation.

Rising levels of CO2 are not near the threat these alarmists have portrayed them to be. There has yet to be a
honest and broad scientific debate on the basic science of CO2's influence on global temperature. The
global climate models predicting large amounts of global warming for a doubling of CO2 are badly flawed. They
should never have been used to establish government climate policy.

The last century's global warming of about 1 degree Fahrenheit is not a consequence of human activities.
This warming is primarily the result of a multi-century changes in the globe's deep ocean circulation.
These ocean current changes have lead to a small and gradual increase in the globe's temperature. We are
coming out of the Little Ice Age and into a generally warmer climate state. This is akin to the warmer global
climate of the Medieval Period. We can do nothing but adapt to such long period natural temperature
changes.

The recent "Climategate" revelations coming out of the University of East Anglia are but the tip of a
giant iceberg of a well organized international climate warming conspiracy that has been gathering momentum for
the last 25 years. This conspiracy would become much more manifest if all the e-mails of the publically funded
climate research groups of the US and of foreign governments were ever made public.

The disastrous economic consequences of restricting CO2 emissions from the present by as much as 20 percent by
2020 and 80 percent by 2050 (as being proposed in Copenhagen) have yet to be digested by the general public.
Such CO2 output decreases would cause very large increases in our energy costs, a lowering of our standard of
living, and do nothing of significance to improve our climate.

The cap-and-trade bill presently before Congress, the likely climate agreements coming out of the Copenhagen
Conference, and the EPA's just announced decision to treat CO2 as a pollutant represents a grave threat to
the industrial world's continued economic development. We should not allow these proposals to restrict our
economic growth. Any United Nations climate bill our country might sign would act as an infringement on our
country's sovereignty.

This toon explains our government of 'change', not just healthcare.
Palosi and Reed have a very effective salesman in Obama.

"Here's a new maxim: Nothing good ever happens when the Congress is in session
on a Saturday night. As you know, Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid (D-Nev) cajoled, coerced, and
co-opted Senators Mary Landrieu (D-La) and Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark) into adding the 59th and 60th necessary
votes to prevent a GOP filibuster of Reid's health reform bill. Reid and Obama Administration officials
relied on the time honored method (used by Republicans and Democrats) of getting recalcitrant Members to vote a
certain way: Bribery which, in the real world, is a felony but in Washington it is called 'hardball.'
In Sen. Landrieu's case the bribe was $300 million in Medicaid benefits to Louisiana. It's not even a
close call. According to the website 'Total Criminal Defense,' ' Bribery is an attempt to
influence another person's actions, usually a government or public official employee, by offering a benefit
in exchange for the desired decision. ' Three hundred million in return for a vote to
proceed.

If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck... Landrieu is a better bribee than she is an accountant. She
said in her floor speech that there was $100 million in the bill specifically to pay for Medicaid in Louisiana
and only Louisiana. Talking to reporters afterward, she said, 'I will correct something. It's not $100
million, it's $300 million, and I'm proud of it and will keep fighting for it.' No reports, yet, on
how angry White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel was when he found out she had been satisfied with the $100
million and he overpaid by a factor of three."
--political analyst Rich Galen

Just in case you forgot, as does the media and our
current (userper) President and all of Congress.

Barack Obama, who found time for he and his wife to go on a 24-hour jaunt to
Copenhagen on Oct. 2 to seek the 2016 Olympics games for the mobsters and Chicago, and all they could do is
talk about themselves, and now apparently, cannot find the time for a 24-hour trip to Berlin on Nov. 9 for a
celebration of the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. Well, I guess we all have our priorities,
and the President <choke> can't be everywhere at once. -
Read More

It would be nice if our elected "Representitives"
would try and abide by their title and job description...

Is a Lack of Vetting What Obama Meant by 'Transparency'?How more disgusting does Obama have to get before we stop him?

Back on the campaign trail, Barack Obama vowed his would be the most
"transparent" administration in U.S. history. Perhaps what he meant was that the mainstream media
would look past the foibles of those he selects for high positions under his watch.

The latest "for instance" comes in the person of "Safe School Czar" Kevin Jennings.
Apparently, in the eyes of Jennings, a "safe school" is one where it's safe for an adult male to
pursue a homosexual relationship with a student. Jennings denied condoning a relationship between a 15-year-old
student and an adult male and threatened to sue a fellow teacher who called his refusal to report the incident
"unethical." But since then, an audiotape has surfaced on which Jennings related to an Iowa
homosexual advocacy group that he told the student to make sure to use a condom when seeing the older man. To
most of us, allowing - and even promoting - statutory rape is grotesque, unquestionably illegal and grossly
negligent, but to Obama, it appears to be qualification for the job.

A little History Lesson
"Those that ignore history are bound to repeat it."The housing crisis and the cause of Americas Economic downfall.

Yeah, it was all Bush's fault.

By enacting The Community
Reinvestment Act of 1977 , Jimmy Carter created the 'Foundation Block' of this economic crisis, the
Democratic Party then started building upon it, and Bill Clinton "strengthened" the entire disastrous
process by giving even more power to anti-American Leftist/Fascist/Communist groups like ACORN.

When President Bush "43" offered Congress a chance to fix the looming economic crisis &#8211; in
2003 &#8211; Democrats like Representative Barney Frank and Senator Chuck Schumer said there was no
problem.

The ignorant, biased media continues to ridicule those of us who believe
the Constitution matters. Know what? I could care less. They don't pay my mortgage and I understand how the
game is played. I say those who will not stand up for the truth are cowards. These useful fools who call any
American vile labels for challenging the eligibility of Obama/Soetoro are either intellectually lazy and refuse
to do the real research. Their paychecks mean more to them than the truth, or they believe in
Obama/Soetoro's Marxist agenda. This usurper must be removed from office. Not because Obama/Soetoro is a
communist and is destroying this country (true), but because he never had the legal right to run for the
presidency or take the oath of office on January 20, 2009.

Please pay attention to this warning, right now!

In his farewell address on March 4, 1837, Andrew Jackson
said:

But you must remember, my fellow-citizens, that eternal
vigilance by the people is the price of liberty, and that you must pay the price if you wish to secure the
blessing. It behooves you, therefore, to be watchful in your States as well as in the Federal
Government.

If you do not start RIGHT NOW, to insist all
of your family, neighbors and friends heed this warning, then you will be on my list as part of the machine
that brought down America. I have had enough of the bleeding heart liberals, socialists and spoiled brats
from the 60's. They are ruining our great nation, and we may not be able to recover from the damage that
the ignorant have done to the rest of us. Yes, I said ignorant. Do you know what the tenth amendment says? If
not, then I can call you a traitor, and part of the cause of our downfall. If you don't like it, then
that is too bad because it is a fact.

You didn't like what happened on Bush's watch? That's nothing. Do you see what's happening on
Obama's watch? If you haven't seen it and aren't outraged, then you are not paying attention! If
you aren't paying attention, then you are part of the cause of our destruction.

Don't believe this?
Then you are an ignorant fool that has helped kill our country.

If you want to be like the people in the mad max movies, then ignore my request, because that is exactly what
we will become if you don't get on a stick today. Not next week, or next month, or when it starts to get
really bad. NOW!

Why am I mad? Because it is these people that have hosed my grandchildren! --JB

The Obama White House "new media" operations Czar recently
contracted a technology vendor to conduct an enormous secret program to gather personal information on
millions of Americans from Internet social networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace and Twitter, according
to the National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC).

The Obama minions are interested in information such as comments, tag lines, emails, audio, and video that
mention - or related to - President Barack Obama.

The sites targeted for surveillance include Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, YouTube, Flickr and others
&#8211;- any space where the White House &#8220;maintains a presence.&#8221;

Aw, and poor ACORN doesn't get to do the census as Obama set them up for... They lost
that task, The Senate and House Voted to STOP It's Funding, but not because Obama and his chicago cronies
didn't try to pull another fast one on the ignorant people of this country.

We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts,
not to overthrow the Constitution,
but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln

WE WILL NEVER FORGET!

I thought that you had to be a citizen of this country to have OUR Constitutional Rights?
Aren't our 'representives' doing a really great job on our behalf?

I really don't think Obama has read the bill he was promoting.

President Obama expected the world to stand at attention when he gave his speech on healthcare to a joint
session of Congress this week. But Americans gave him a huge thumbs down.

In fact, most Americans didn't even watch Obama's speech - despite the media hoopla, they are tiring
of his "Rah-Rah for me" crap. The people don't like the "worship me" messages and
elongating list of broken promises. Many just flat don't believe the liar anymore.

Only about 10 percent of Americans even tuned in - and that was an incredible drop of 39 percent from the TV
audience that tuned in to watch Obama's State of the Union speech just last January!

Americans are voting with their minds. They are tired of his ignorant speeches. They are tired of the lies
and deceit from Obama and his entire camp in Washington.

Obama has stated repeatedly that illegals will not be covered, but he knew full well that there was NO
provision in the House or Senate bills to stop illegals from getting free healthcare. Unless he still has
not read it? Or maybe he can't think as well as the rest of America.

Obama claimed critics were causing hysteria by saying the plan called for "death panels" of the
elderly. He's right - they are not called death panels. They are called "oversight" panels
which will set policies on the use of resources to pay for medical resources. But, Sarah Palin's label
still fits.

That means rationing. That means faceless bureaucrats will decide who lives and who dies.

Obama said during the ABC Special on Wednesday night that a way to save healthcare costs is to abandon the
sort of care that &#8220;evidence shows is not necessarily going to improve&#8221; the
patient&#8217;s health. He went on to say that he had personal familiarity with such a situation when
his grandmother broke her hip after she was diagnosed with terminal cancer.

Obama offered a question on the efficacy of further care for his grandmother saying, "and the question
was, does she get hip replacement surgery, even though she was fragile enough they were not sure how long
she would last?"

But who is it that will present the "evidence" that will "show" that further care is
futile? Are we to believe that Obama expects individual doctors will make that decision in his bold new
government controlled healthcare future? If he is trying to make that claim it is a flat out untruth and he
knows it. Read
what he said on TV Wednesday night, June 24th, 2009

It's already happening in Europe. Just this week the London Telegraph reported that doctors working for
Britain's National Health Service are systematically killing the elderly that have terminal diseases.

According to the British report, a doctor can decide to withhold food and water from a patient who has a
terminal illness - even though the patient may be able to live for a long time with proper care.

To mask the trauma of this starvation technique, the doctor gives the patient sedatives until the patient
dies. The paper said the matter had become a "national crisis" in Britain.

Would you trust someone like President Barack Obama, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, or Senate majority Leader
Harry Reid to oversee your health - to appoint people who will make such life and death decisions? My God,
look at the other czars he has appointed, and those in his cabinet, his advisor's, they read like a
who's who from the Chicago mob.

This is the grave danger of Obamacare, in addition to being one of many of his an unconstitutional acts,
and this is just the begining with 3.25 years left.

In the end he turns control of your health - and your life - to the government and faceless bureaucrats and
away from you, your family, and your own doctor.

Sorry, but Obama's credibility is waining toward the critical point. The people are starting to tune him
out. (hint hint) His only gift as an orator, almost as good as Hitler, is becoming of no value to the machine
behind him. The people are realizing that voting him in was a HUGE mistake. We don't believe you any
more.

He is even becoming the brunt of jokes from Hollywood.

The Tonight Show with Conan O'Brien:

"Republican Congressman Joe Wilson has apologized for calling President Obama a liar during his speech
on healthcare. Obama accepted Wilson&#8217;s apology, then invited him to appear before a death
panel."

The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson:

"President Obama gave a speech last night on healthcare. At one point, Congressman Joe Wilson yelled
out during the speech, &#8220;You Lie!&#8221; Until then, the speech was just normal, and by normal
I mean boring. It caused a commotion. All the rest of the politicians were like, 'How does he
know?'"

Jimmy Kimmel Live!

"President Obama made his healthcare address to Congress. It went pretty well, except for one weird
part in the middle when a congressman from South Carolina suddenly yelled out, 'You lie!'
It&#8217;s amazing &#8212; this guy was able to sit through seven years of President Bush telling
him everything in Iraq was fine."

With all the broken promises and misrepresentations, and terrible appointments... And, he obviously
doesn't understand that almost all of his actions since becoming president are unconstitutional as well
as the fact he was not eligible to begin with... Etc., etc., etc.

Where/how/when will this Obamanation end?

Will the 'Truthers' just go away, please?

"Dozens of engineers wonder how those buildings collapsed as they did."

Well, YEAH...that's what we engineers do, we wonder about things and then come up with answers!

In this case, the ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers for all you liberal arts majors) released a
report in 2002 on the event. To summarize:

"...the report concluded that the towers withstood the impact of the two hijacked jetliners, and if not
for the intense fire ignited by the thousands of pounds of fuel carried by the planes, and fueled by the
contents of the buildings, the towers likely would have stood indefinitely. However, the two events
occurring simultaneously led to the collapse.

The team also concluded that fireproofing materials adhered to the steel structure during construction were
likely blown off by the impact of planes and thus left the structure more vulnerable to the heat of the
fire."

Basically what happened was that the heat of the fires weakened the structural supports to the extent that
the buildings "pancaked" on themselves. DUH!

If you're interested in the full report, go to http://www.asce.org/.

All of the speculation is only that, just speculation. There is no scientific justification for the
speculative claims such as "it sounded like a bomb", or "it looked like a
demolition".

If you are still in belief of these ignorant claims, then you probably also voted for Obama. Your childish
attitude and ignorant thinking is ruining our once great country, as indicated with facts on this an many
other websites.

Now, please just STFU!

Why do so many Americans still think that
Obama has our best interest on his agenda?

He doesn't. He has governmental power over the people on his agenda.
Don't you think it is time to take our country back from the government?

In summary:

While an adoring media heap adulation on him, Obama has
presided over the appointment of an appalling rogue's gallery of crooks, cronies, and tax cheats to the
highest levels of our government - while reneging on promises to make government more transparent and
accountable.

If this is not obvious to you, then you haven't been paying attention. All of this was predicted, and
for some reason, the (ignorant) people didn't want to listen. Because of this, our nation is totally
screwed.

"I'm sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and disagree with this administration,
somehow you're not patriotic. We need to stand up and say we're Americans, and we have the right to
debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton

The Democrats don't get it... Do you? Yet?

We may need health care reform in America, but there is a right way - and a wrong way - to
go about it.

President Obama and Congressional Democrats want a government-run health care system that puts a Washington
bureaucrat between American families and their doctors. And yes, that does include the 'death
panel' as Sarah Palin said. She said it because it's true, she's read the bill. Have you?
And Obama has said that there would be one.

Their first thought was to try to rush a bill to the White House before Congress left Washington for August
recess, and now we know why.

The American people have had a chance to read for themselves what President Obama and his Democrat allies in
Congress intend for our health care and have been letting them know, loud and clear, in townhall meetings and
national polls, that they don't like it at all.

But the Obama Democrats have circled the wagons, stung and angry that the people dare presume to tell them
what kind of health care they want. So Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid will be coming back to
Washington to show the American people they won&#8217;t let a little thing like public outrage get between
them and their desire for socialist control over our lives.

Barack Obama and congressional Democrats think government is the solution to every problem. They're
wrong.

The government already runs car companies, banks and mortgage companies. Republicans believe that the last
thing the American people want is government telling them when and where - or even whether - they can get
medical treatment for their families.

Never let the opportunity of a crisis get away.
If there isn't a big enough one to take total control, manufacture one.

Medicare, the largest purchaser of health care in the United States, doesn't
negotiate. It sets prices that providers must accept.

This threatens insurance companies because they have to pick up the slack. Medicare generates a net loss for
health-care providers that they can only make up by charging higher rates to private insurers. As government
buys more health care at lower and lower costs, insurers will be forced to pay more and more. Wall Street is
worried this cycle will feed on itself until the last private insurer goes belly up.

This is just one more example of how the Democrats will create a crisis, that will easily convince the
ignorant masses (voters) that only more government can solve the problem, like it is already doing with the
auto industry, the banks, everything else it can control. The game is to create a crisis, fix it by taxation
to pay for more government, less liberty.

You remember liberty... the foundation of America, and why so many millions have immigrated here.

They still don't get it. Come on people, your ignorance is
showing.

"The American people must regain the ability to distinguish between wants and needs
and must shed the ridiculous notion that government exists to provide either. Our Constitution - drafted by
men well acquainted with the abusive capacities of a centralized government - limited the roles and
responsibilities of the federal government in order to allow the principle of self-government to flourish in
the new nation.

Government exists to preserve and protect the sphere of civil freedom within which we can work to meet
our needs and our wants. Government does not exist to provide them." --columnist Ken Connor

More: "Never pass up the opportunity of a crisis."

"Liberals think they can improve the problem of a partial monopoly by turning it into
a total monopoly. That's what single-payer health care is: 'Single payer' means 'single
provider.' It's the famous liberal two-step: First screw something up, then claim that it's
screwed up because there's not enough government oversight (it's the free market run wild!), and then
step in and really screw it up in the name of 'reform.'" --columnist Ann Coulter

What could possibly go wrong?

Let me get this straight.

Obama's health care plan will:

Be written by a committee whose head says he doesn't understand it.

Be passed by a Congress that hasn't read it (but exempts themselves from it).

Be signed by a president who smokes (and also hasn't read it).

Have funding administered by a treasury chief who did not pay his taxes.

Be overseen by a surgeon general who is obese.

Be financed by a country that is nearly broke.

What could possibly go wrong?

The Ten Commandments According to Obama - Tee Shirt

After observing Obama on the campaign trail and during his first six months in office, we have concluded
that our President lives and governs according to his own set of &#8220;Ten Commandments.&#8221;
They&#8217;re certainly NOT the Ten Commandments you learned in Sunday School. In fact, many are the
direct opposite! So, PatriotPost.com has produced this t-shirt to help wake your fellow Americans up to his
radical agenda.

Features the Patriot Depot Revolutionary War Soldier Logo on the front left of
the t-shirt. The text on the back of the t-shirt reads:

The Ten Commandments According to Obama

I . Thou shalt have no God in America, except for me. For we are no longer a Christian
nation and, after all, I am the chosen One. (And like God, I do not have a birth certificate.) SOURCE

V . Honour thy father and thy mother until they are too old and sick to care for. They
will cost our public-funded health-care system too much money.
SOURCE

VI . Thou shalt not kill, unless you have an unwanted, unborn baby. For it would be an
abomination to punish your daughter with a baby. SOURCE

VII . Thou shalt not commit adultery if you are conservative or a Republican. Liberals
and Democrats are hereby forgiven for all of their infidelity and immorality, but the careers of
conservatives will be forever destroyed. SOURCE

VIII . Thou shalt not steal, until you've been elected to public office. Only then
is it acceptable to take money from hard-working, successful citizens and give it to those who do not work,
illegal immigrants, or those who do not have the motivation to better their own lives. SOURCE

X . Thou shalt not covet because it is simply unnecessary. I will place such a heavy tax
burden on those that have achieved the American Dream that, by the end of my term as President, nobody will
have any wealth or material goods left for you to covet. SOURCE

Are you ready to become another Banana-Republic?Unchecked carbon emissions will likely cause icebergs to melt.
Unchecked greenback emissions will certainly cause the purchasing power of currency to melt.Warren
Buffett writes in The New York Times

These insane lunatics in the House of Representatives have passed H.R. 2749: Food
Safety Enhancement Act of 2009. This is one of THE most dangerous pieces of legislation next to the take over
of health care and "cap and trade." The complete take over of our food supply must be stopped!

This unconstitutional legislation will make criminals of anyone who dares to grow food in their own
yard.That bill has NOTHING to do with food safety. It has everything to do with
total control by a totalitarian government apparatus.

Stay in the face of your federal senator during this recess and tell them to throw out H.R. 2749 and leave us
alone!

Scientific Facts on Climate Change (Global Warming?)

Though there are several varieties of aerosols, previous research has shown that two types
- sulfates and black carbon - play an especially critical role in regulating climate change. Both are products
of human activity.

Sulfates, which come primarily from the burning of coal and oil, scatter incoming solar radiation and have a
net cooling effect on climate. Over the past three decades, the United States and European countries have
passed a series of laws that have reduced sulfate emissions by 50 percent. While improving air quality
and aiding public health, the result has been less atmospheric cooling from sulfates.

At the same time, black carbon emissions have steadily risen, largely because of increasing emissions, mostly
from Asia. Black carbon - small, soot-like particles produced by industrial processes and the combustion of
diesel and biofuels - absorb incoming solar radiation and have a strong warming influence on the
atmosphere.

Since the 1890s, surface temperatures have risen faster in the Arctic than in other regions of the world. In
part, these rapid changes could be due to changes in aerosol levels. Clean air regulations passed in
the 1970s, for example, have likely accelerated warming by diminishing the cooling effect of
sulfates.

So, it seems that our efforts so clean up the air has helped warm the planet. The US and GB efforts will
not have very much impact because Asia (China) and India combined produce more of this than the US and the EU.
They will not comply with the Kyoto Treaty, which will make our participation a total waste of money our
country cannot afford. Anyone that pushes this issue is obviously going to profit from the scare tactics as
has been obviously the motive of Al Gore and his cronies. IMHO. -jb

WND Exclusive ~ BORN IN THE
USA?
Is this really smoking gun of Obama's Kenyan birth?
Attorney files motion for authentication of alleged 1960s certificate from Africa

WASHINGTON &#8211; California attorney Orly Taitz, who has filed a number of lawsuits demanding
proof of Barack Obama's eligibility to serve as president, has released a copy of what purports to be a
Kenyan certification of birth and has filed a new motion in U.S. District Court for its
authentication.

As we have been saying all all along, Obama, born in Kenya, is not legally our president!

My response to those saying The left is correct,
and Obama is our president, get over it, etc:

You libs cry 'Choice!' when you want to murder children in utero, but when people
want to defend themselves from criminals and out of control government with guns as the 2nd Amendment
guarantees, 'choice' is a dirty word.

When it comes to healthcare, 'choice' is a dirty word.

When it comes to lower taxes and smaller government and spending, 'choice' is a dirty word.

When it comes to content in educaiton, 'choice' is a dirty word.

When it comes to where our children are educated, 'choice' is a dirty word.

When it comes to Freedom of Information about your enemies, choice is an imperative, but when it comes time
for y'all to pony up with the facts, FOI and choice are dirty words.

When it comes to the media, if it's not leftist controlled, 'choice' is a dirty word.

If it comes to debate in Congress and the Senate when you're in control, 'choice' is a dirty
word.

When it comes to Americans voicing their opinions, especially if they don't toe your party
line,'choice' is a dirty word.

If it comes to how we invest and spend our hard earned money, 'choice' is a dirty word.

The only real choices you like and will allow are the options you choose for the rest of us. You don't
want to protect life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness, you just want to use those to exploit and further
your anti-American, anti-JudeoChristian, and anti-human agenda.

I guess in your warped way of thinking, I don't have any right or reason to be angry/frustrated, because
your agenda is so obviously correct as to be beyond reproach.

Sorry to disappoint you and break your egomaniacal/narcissistic reverie. Your worldview is as fraudulent as
the document your liberal friend manufactured to distract and discredit from the real issue of your
fraudulent neo-commie Obamassiah and his fraudulent plans for this country, in cahoots with his fraudulent
allies and supporters. I've seen postings with more insults than just about any others on forums all over
the internet, and if you want to go that route, I can more than oblige.

You want to play the dozens, I can play that game, but the vacuousness of your mind is a crying shame, as
it's hard to play chess with that checkers mind of yours, thanks to the left's highly successful
dumbing-down of America agenda to garner unearned votes from idiots just like you, only to gain power at the
expense of greatest people/country ever born.

"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than
the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch
down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that
ye were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams

-John Beaman

A Freudian slip , or parapraxis, is an error in speech, memory, or physical action
that is interpreted as occurring due to the interference
of some unconscious ('dynamically repressed') wish, conflict, or train of thought, thereby revealing
ones true thoughts or intentions.

What Conyers and other Democrats don't understand is that:

"A right is not a guarantee that the government (i.e.,
other people) will provide you something for free. We have the right to engage in religious expression, but
that doesn't mean that the government pays for the construction of the church. We have the right to
peacefully assemble, but the government doesn't promise to supply your transportation. You have the right
to keep and bear arms, but don't expect the government to provide you with a free firearm and bullets. You
have the right to free speech, but the government won't grant you free radio or TV air time. What makes
something a right is not whether the government can force somebody else to pay for it." More...

"Liberty not only means that the individual has both
the opportunity and the burden of choice; it also means
that he must bear the consequences of his actions and
will receive praise or blame for them." - F. A. Hayek

Problem is, everyone wants the government to save them.... -jb

Exploiting Public Ignorance

According to Census tables, "The percentage of
African-Americans living below the poverty level was 33.4 percent (10.8 million) in 1992, the year Clinton was
first elected president. By 2000, the year Bush was elected, that figure had dropped to 22.5 percent (7.9
million) - a decrease of 10.9 percent. From 2000, however, the Black poverty increased from 22.5 percent to
23.9 percent in 2002 and 24.3 percent in 2003 (9.1 million)." Now that we have a 'black
president', userper Barry Sotero is giving away $13.3 Billion Dollars of our money to foreign countries,
another $500 billion in swaps, and importing more people than the jobs we are losing, it is doubling the
unemployed to record setting levels. This mass immigration displaced Blacks from taxi cab jobs, janitorial
services, delivery, fast food, construction, landscaping, moving jobs and more. The traitors Pelosi, Reid, and
now Obama, augment 138,000 legal immigrants into America every 30 days, without societal responsibility.
Combined with another 100,000 unlawful immigrant workers added monthly, American Blacks take a backseat in the
economic, housing, educational and opportunity bus. But, because Mr. Obama is 'black', and promised
change, everyone has fallen for the lies. Duped by ignorance, (what got him elected) he just continues the
lies while screwing not only African-Americans, but everyone else too.

Best explanation ever!

Exploiting Public Ignorance

How can political commentators, politicians and academics get
away with statements like "Reagan budget deficits," "Clinton budget surplus," "Bush
budget deficits" or "Obama's tax increases"? The only answer is that they, or the people
who believe such statements, are ignorant, conniving or just plain stupid.

Article I, Section 7 of the U.S. Constitution reads: "All bills for raising revenue shall originate
in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other
Bills."

A president has no power to raise or lower taxes. The president can only propose tax measures or veto
them, but since Congress can ignore presidential proposals and override a presidential veto, it has
the ultimate taxing power. The same principle applies to spending. A president cannot spend a dime that
Congress does not first appropriate. As such, presidents cannot be held responsible for budget deficits or
surpluses. That means that credit for a budget surplus or blame for budget deficits rests on the congressional
majority at the time.

Thinking about today's massive deficits, we might ask: Where in the U.S. Constitution is Congress
given the authority to do anything about the economy? Between 1787 and 1930, we have had both mild and
severe economic downturns that have ranged from one to seven years. During that time there was no thought that
Congress should enact New Deal legislation or stimulus packages along with massive corporate handouts. It took
the Herbert Hoover and Franklin Roosevelt administrations to massively intervene in the economy. As a result,
they turned what might have been a two or three-year sharp downturn into a 16-year depression that ended in
1946. How they accomplished that is covered very well in a book authored by Jim Powell titled "FDR's
Folly."

Here's my question: Were the presidents in office and congresses assembled from 1787 to 1930 ignorant of
their constitutional authority to manage and save the economy?

If you asked President Obama or a congressman to cite the specific constitutional authority for the bailouts,
handouts and corporate takeover, I'd bet the rent money that they would say that their authority lies in
Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution that reads: " The Congress shall have Power To lay and
collect Taxes, Duties, Impost, Excises to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare
of the United States. " They'd tell you that their authority comes from the Constitution's
"general welfare" clause. James Madison, the father of our constitution, explained, " If
Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the general welfare, the
government is no longer a limited one possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one subject to
particular exceptions. " He later added, " With respect to the two words 'general
welfare,' I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take
them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which
there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators. " Thomas Jefferson said, "
Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those
specifically enumerated. " That means only those powers listed.

The Constitution provides, through Article V, a means by which the Constitution can be altered. My question to
my fellow Americans whether they are liberal or conservative: Has the Constitution been amended to permit
Congress to manage the economy? I'd also ask that question to members of the U.S. Supreme Court. I
personally know of no such amendment.

What we're witnessing today is nothing less than a massive escalation in White House and
congressional thuggery. Secure in the knowledge that the American people are compliant and willing to
cast off the limitations imposed on Washington by the nation's founders, future administrations are
probably going to be even more emboldened than Obama and the current Congress.

Who is The Village Idiot, Al Gore or those that voted for him?

Al Gore has not yet addressed the simple fact that global
temperatures have dropped since the release of his global warming film. (Gore has also not addressed this:
Another Moonwalker Defies Gore: NASA Astronaut Dr. Buzz Aldrin rejects global warming fears: '
Climate has been changing for billions of years ' - Moonwalkers Defy Gore's Claim That Climate
Skeptics Are Akin To Those Who Believe Moon Landing was 'Staged' ) Read more...

Men fight for liberty and win it with hard knocks.
Their children, brought up easy, let it slip away again, poor fools.
And their grandchildren are once more slaves. ~D.H. Lawrence, Classical American Literature,
1922

Legendary oil man T. Boone Pickens says that if the U.S. doesn&#8217;t take
major steps to curb its reliance on foreign oil, the consequences will be drastic.

"Let&#8217;s say in 10 years, you do nothing," Pickens tells
Fortune Magazine.

"You will be importing 75 percent of your oil (up from 68 percent now),
and you&#8217;ll be paying $300 a barrel."

Yes, the war in the Middle East IS all about oil. But
not the way you think, due to the media bias. What would it do to our economy when we spend $2 TRILLION out
of our economy to countries like Venezuela, the Middle East, and Africa?

Our 'president' is supposed to be looking out for our interest, and doing something about it falls
under that responsibility. It has nothing to do with the 'Bush is an oil man' crap. But,
when something is done to help keep our economy from going in to the garbage, (like the resumption of the
Gulf War in Iraq), that is what the media makes you think. Want proof? Watch the price of gas do additional
damage to our economy with Obama's Middle East policies...

Gas was $1.00 a gallon before the latest Iraq incursion into Bagdad. It would normally double to $2.00
because the demand is higher due to China and India's demands. it started to go upwards of $4.00 when the
hated 'surge' accomplished to end the serious fighting, but was never reported as a victory.

If we had pulled out instead, what would be the price of gas today? Well, just double $4.00 and you get $8.00
per gallon. What would that do to our economy? To YOUR personal finances? You only need to wait while Obama
makes it all come true anyway with his total lack of understanding of the geo-political issues as has been
proven lately, and the swooning over him by the media. Get a clue, The completion of the Gulf War has saved
our economy, and yet everyone thinks it was bad? -jb

Friday, June 19, 2009: Iranians Betrayed by Obama
Administration

More than 1.5 million protesters took to the streets of Tehran on Monday, marking the largest anti-regime
demonstration Iran has seen since the final days of the shah in early 1979.

Seven people were killed by anti-riot police and roving bands of Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad supporters. Many of those supporters shielded their faces from surveillance videos that plainclothes
police were shooting.

Now, "people are waiting for international support," Mohseni
wrote.

That support wasn&#8217;t coming - at least not from President Barack
Obama's administration in Washington.

Even as Ayatollah Khamenei blasted the United States for fomenting unrest in a defiant Friday prayer address in
Tehran, President Obama has kept silent, focusing instead on domestic policy.

Obama spent more time with TV personality Stephen Colbert, taping a segment for
a comedy show, than he did addressing the turmoil in Iran this week.

Newsmax has learned that the Obama administration also has zeroed out funding
for pro-democracy programs inside Iran from the State Department budget for fiscal 2010, just as protests in
Iran are ramping up.

Maybe I was wrong, maybe the userper Obama is our greatest
threat...."The Emperor Has No Clue!" -JB 2007

As Dick Morris says: "Right now Obama is waging a war on prosperity while canceling the war on
terror." (Dick Morris was Bill Clintons chief advisor.) And he is right. (IMHO) :-)

I know Democrats have no clue to Foreign Relations, but
this is reduclous. The greatest threat to our price of oil, and Middle East stability, no, not Osama, but
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who says Jews don't deserve to live, etc.

Conversation regarding the exploding budget deficit generally focuses on the major spending increase generated
by the $787 billion fiscal stimulus package. But there's another side to the deficit - plunging tax
receipts. Federal tax revenue plummeted 34 percent in April from a year ago, to $138 billion - the largest
decline in 28 years.

"As income levels drop for workers and companies, so do their tax payments. Income tax revenue cratered 44
percent in April from a year ago."But... So What?

Not ONE DIME of 'income tax' pays for any government services. (more media disinformation) It is all
the other taxes that have reduced the treasury revenues that provide for services. Do not get them mixed up, or
together, as the media and many newsletters would inadvertantly(?) lead you to believe. Like calling us a
democracy, (wrong!) all taxes are not income taxes. What pays for the roads? Gasoline Taxes. What pays for the
schools? Property Taxes... etc. --JB

They still don't get
it:

"You cannot tax a country into prosperity, but only into slavery."

Republicans treat every day is like it is July 4th.Democrats treat every day is like it is April 15th.

--- Ronald Regan

"I sincerely believe... that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies,
and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity under the name of funding is but
swindling futurity on a large scale."

--Thomas Jefferson

"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to
Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents..."

I am sorry, but how can the Faux Pres receive a high approval rate (or any at all) when a story on the
front page of yesterday's New York Times quoted a White House senior staffer as saying that Pres. Obama
will pursue immigration reform that "controls immigration and makes it an orderly system." Last
week's unemployment numbers continued to worsen and most economists say the job cuts will continue at a
high rate. But Pres. Obama insists on offering amnesty to more than 12 million illegal aliens while more than
13 million Americans are looking for work. Please explain this to me. Unless it is only for the votes of those
12 million that are the basis for the approval rating.... -JB

How can a Marxist Muslim born in Kenya (Indonesia) become our president?

The evidence that Barack Hussein Obama (Barry Santos) (Soetoro) was born in
Africa - not Hawaii as he claims - and, therefore, cannot serve as the President of the United States, is
compelling:

First, Mr. Obama's refusal to release his birth certificate. If he has
nothing to hide, what does he gain by refusing to allow the press to see the birth certificate?

Second, the contention by Barack Obama's half-sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng,
that Mr. Obama was born in a particular Hawaiian hospital, only to claim that it was in a different hospital
several years later.

Third, the erecting of a wall around Barack Obama's grandmother, the
late Madelyn Dunham, by Mr. Obama, thus cutting off access to the one person then alive who would have been
present if he was actually born in Hawaii.

Fourth, the posting of law enforcement personnel at the two hospitals in
Honolulu mentioned by Ms. Soetoro-Ng in an effort to block the press from discovering the truth about the
birth certificate.

Fifth, a taped phone conversation with Mr. Obama's step-grandmother in
Kenya, who claims that she was present at his birth ... in what is now called Kenya!

Sixth, the "birth certificate" posted on the Obama campaign
website and other liberal websites. Since Barack Obama was born in 1961, long before laser printers and
office computers, his original birth certificate would be typewritten ... unlike the laser printed
"copy" purported to be genuine.

The Federal Quo Warranto Statute Is The Only Constitutional
Means of Removing a Sitting President Other Than Impeachment Read the QUO
WARRANTO LEGAL BRIEF here.

It was disclosed last week that the AKA (Also Known As
'Barack Obama') Certification of Live Birth (COLB) documents, appearing mostly on pro-AKA sites, have
been forged and/or altered. These documents can be viewed at:

These images are represented by digital files, ie, computer language which can be opened using a text editor
program.

The COLB appearing at the dailykos.com URL above carries the following information in the digital file:

What this says is that this image was forged/altered on June 12, 2008 at 08:42:36 using Photoshop CS3 for
Macintosh.

The COLB appearing at the politfact.com URL above carries the following information in the digital file:

It seems that a computer named "Ducky" was used and Adobe to alter this file. An e-mail to Amy
Hollyfield who wrote the article for politifact.com, requesting of her where she obtained the image shown in
the article, goes unanswered.

The same is true of the COLB appearing at the fightthesmears.com URL above:

And the same is also true of the COLB appearing at the L.A. Times URL's above:

That the digital images appearing on fightthesmears.com, politifact.com, and the L.A. Times all appear to have
been altered using the same computer makes it apparent they all came from the same source. It is also obvious
from the digital files of these images, that there are multiple forged/altered copies on the internet.

It is these COLB's that Congress have referenced in claiming that AKA was born in Hawaii. It is very
obvious that not one of these documents is authentic.

Obamas profound understanding of economics

"A nation trying to tax itself into prosperity,
is like a man standing in a bucket trying to
lift himself up by the handle."

--- Winston Churchill

Obama had Winston Churchills bust thrown out of
our Whitehouse. Why does this not surprise me?

CLUELESS

I thought I'd heard it all, but now...

- Martin Niemoeller, a U-Boat hero
back in the days of Hitler's Germany.

As you may know, during the Clinton administration, a Phoenix Federal Bureau of
Investigation and Joint Terrorism Task Force explicitly designated "defenders" of the Constitution
as "right-wing extremists."

Now a secret Missouri state police report that categorized supporters of Congressman Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and
Chuck Baldwin as "'militia' influenced terrorists." The report, he said, "instructs
the Missouri police to be on the lookout for supporters displaying bumper stickers and other paraphernalia
associated with the Constitutional, Campaign for Liberty, and Libertarian parties."

A review of the report reveals that opposition to any of the following risks someone being classified as a
potential "domestic terrorist":

The New World Order

The United Nations

Gun Control

The violation of Posse Comitatus

The Federal Reserve

The Income Tax

The Ammunition Accountability Act

A possible Constitutional Convention (Con Con)

The North American Union

Universal Service Program

Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)

Abortion on demand

Illegal Immigration

Again, if you oppose any of the above, or if you supported Ron Paul, Bob
Barr, or Chuck Baldwin, you risk being labeled a "domestic terrorist," according to the MIAC.

I encourage everyone who believes in the freedom of speech and who believes that the MIAC report is an
egregious miscarriage of justice to contact the appropriate Missouri police officials.

Here is the contact information:

Email address: Brandon.middleton@mshp.dps.mo.gov

"They came first for the communists, and I did not speak up-because I was not a communist;

And then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak up - because I was not a trade unionist;

And then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak up because I was not a Jew;

And then they came for me - and there was no one left to speak up."

So, will you speak up now or wait until they come for you and no one is left to speak up?

I may have posted this before, but it bears repeating:

James Madison:

"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to
Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents...

If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare,
the Government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one, subject to
particular exceptions.

The powers delegated by the Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to
remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.

There are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of
those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations."

Those who do not understand our history - mostly those identified as "liberal" in
contemporary vernacular - assume the words of our Founders are as antiquated as the Declaration and
Constitution they created. However, students of history understand that both the threats our Founders
confronted at the dawn of our nation, and their advice, have endured to this day.

Indeed, to paraphrase Santayana's aphorism, "They who do not know their history are destined to
repeat it."

"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent
about things that matter." --Martin Luther King

"When you see that trading is
done, not by consent, but by compulsion - when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission
from men who produce nothing - when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in
favors - when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don't protect
you against them, but protect them against you - when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a
self-sacrifice, you may know that your society is doomed."

Guess what? We are doomed.

I guess this is what Obama meant by "Change".

"This process of election affords
a moral certainty that the office of President will seldom fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent
degree endowed with the requisite qualifications."

--Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 68, 14 March 1788

The Obama 'Change' is to add to the regular Democratstax-and-spend , a $7-8 trillion deficit on our grandchildren.

A good friend of mine wrote:

In literal terms, without the
authoritarian propaganda spin, here is how things work: A bunch of liars and crooks, declaring themselves to
be our rightful rulers, steal tons and tons of money from the rest of us. They then spend far MORE than they
steal, and declare that the difference, the debt, is OUR responsibility. And almost everyone accepts that as
true.

It's not.

Those wearing the label of "government" borrowed money from people, promising to pay it back. How
would they do that? By continually taxing you and me. EVERYONE, Americans and foreigners, who bought Treasury
bonds, or by any other means loaned money to any government, on the promise that the government would later
pay it back, was banking on the fact that the tyrants would be able to continue robbing YOU and ME. That is
how "investments" in all levels of "government," from federal stuff down to local
"municipal bonds," work.

How Obama Got elected:

Ignorance.

"One of my wife's friends told her on Tuesday that someone she knew had been renting a house to a
single African-American woman for several years. The lady had apparently never missed a payment or even been
late with one.

But, for some strange reason, immediately after Barack Obama was elected to office last November, the woman
reportedly stopped paying rent. When politely questioned about it, she told her landlord: "We have a new
president now and some things are going to change." He replied: "Well, that's fine, but you
still have to pay your rent," to which she reiterated: "No, we have a new president now and some
things are going to change."

News Flash: The "American Girl" doll and assessories are now made in China.

I am disgusted. When will the employers realize that though cheaper to have them
made in China, their customers will not have the money to buy them without their jobs.

This could have been written recently about Obamas plans for us...

"The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the
departments in one, and thus to create whatever the form of government,
a real despotism. A just estimate of that love of power, and proneness
to abuse it, which predominates in the human heart is sufficient to
satisfy us of the truth of this position."
- George Washington (Farewell Address, 19 September 1796)

You have to pinch yourself when a Marxist radical who
all his life has been mentored by, sat at the feet of, worshiped with, befriended, endorsed the philosophy
of, funded and been in turn funded, politically promoted and supported by a nexus comprising black power
anti-white racists, Jew-haters, revolutionary Marxists, unrepentant former terrorists and Chicago mobsters,
is now the President of the United States. And, apparently it's considered impolite to say
so...

Democracy is just another form of tyranny. Benjamin Franklin
summarized it simply: "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for
lunch." James Madison, often called the father of the Constitution, said, "Democracies have
ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or
the rights of properties; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their
deaths." - Read
More...

Or, as a friend of mine once said: "To put it even more bluntly, there's another good example of
true democracy in action: gang rape ."

"If a Nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization,
it expects what never was and never will be...
If we are to guard against ignorance and remain free,
it is the responsibility of every American to be informed."
- Thomas Jefferson --

Consider the current crisis.

The causes are complex, but the driving force is clearly government intervention:

the Fed keeping interest rates below the rate of inflation, thus encouraging people to borrow and
providing the impetus for a housing bubble;

the Community Reinvestment Act, which forces banks to lend money to low-income and poor-credit
households;

the creation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with government-guaranteed debt leading to artificially low
mortgage rates and the illusion that the financial instruments created by bundling them are low risk;

government-licensed rating agencies, which gave AAA ratings to mortgage-backed securities, creating a
false sense of confidence;

deposit insurance and the "too big to fail" doctrine, whose bailout promises have created huge
distortions in incentives and risk-taking throughout the financial system;

and so on.

In the face of this long list, who can say with a straight face that the housing and financial markets were
frontiers of "cowboy capitalism"?

This sequence was started by Jimmy Carter, promoted during the Clinton Administration with the help of
Barak Obama an employee of Acorn back then (who just recieved over 80 million of your childrens dollars by
Barack Obama for helping him (illegally) get elected.) I wonder why people blame all this financial caos on
Bush? Is this part of the rampant ignorance propagated by the mainstream media? I think so.

This is just the latest example of a pattern that has been going on since the rise of capitalism:
capitalism is blamed for the ills of government intervention - and then even more government intervention is
proposed as the cure? How can anyone support this madness? - Only through ignorance. (IMHO)

Will the last person getting on the wagon,
when it won't go anymore due to the freeloaders,
appologize to those of us that are left to pull it?

AND NOW, FROM THE "I-TOLD-YOU-SO DEPARTMENT"
(Stuff posted before the election follows from here on.)

Like I said, when our enemies like a candidate, there must be a reason...

What's your reason to vote for him? If you can see the problem here, you need to educate those that still
want to vote for 'Obama-Biden'. (Yeah, it looks like 'Osama Binladen' as it's a big hint to
how much it will cost us, as in 9/11...)

True Americans don't let their friends vote ignorant!

When our enemies like candidate Obama, there must be a reason...
They did their homework, they arn't as ignorant as most voters.
Have you done your homework? - You are voting, right?

They like him because he will help their cause. Look at these people and organizations up on the
internet. It will give you an idea why they like him so much. They have done their homework, have you? You
are the ones voting for him (maybe) so your voice is more powerful than theirs.

If you want America to become what these people want, then by all means, after reading about them, do
for your posterity what you now feel is right. To vote from an ignorant point of view is a shamefull
disservice to all Americans, particularly your children. So, do your homework first!

"If a Nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state
of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be...
If we are to guard against ignorance and remain free, it is
the responsibility of every American to be informed."
--Thomas Jefferson--

While Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama "has tried to push his origins into the
background, his 'Islamic roots' have won him a place in many Arabs' hearts."

That's the observation of Iranian-born commentator Amir Taheri, whose column in Tuesday's New York
Post notes that many Arabs and other Muslims see Obama as "one of them."

They see that Obama has Arabic-Islamic first and middle names: Barack means "blessed" and
Hussein means "beautiful." His last name is Swahili, an East African language based on Arabic,
Taheri writes. His sister is named Oumah, Arabic for "the community of the faithful;" his daughter
Malia bears the name of a daughter of the noted Caliph Othman; and his father and stepfather were both
Muslims.

Although Taheri did not note it, Obama has not proven his American Citizenship. Obama was raised partially
as a Muslim when he lived in Indonesia with his mother and stepfather. While there, he studied at two schools
and was registered at both as a Muslim student.

As such he received Islamic religious instruction, studied the Koran, and prayed with other students. He
did attend mosque, albeit infrequently, with his stepfather. [Do you know what happens if a Muslim
renounces his religon and converts to become a Christian? If it were true, the penality is death. Read the
papers on the subject. He is still alive. Do you ever wonder that maybe he didn't really
convert?]

Obama's religious upbringing after Indonesia is somewhat of a mystery until his late 20s. At that
point, Obama says he converted to Christianity after meeting the Rev. Jeremiah Wright in Chicago. [And
you have heard his philosophy toward America that Osama listened to and praised for many years. Converting to
that preachers philosophy is not good for America.]

Still, Obama has maintained strong support from American Muslims, including Louis Farrakhan's Nation
of Islam movement. Farrakhan has endorsed Obama and has called him the "messiah." [If you
don't know who he is, look it up on the net. Don't vote ignorant.]

These factors have made Obama a big hit in the Arab world, where he has received wide praise,
including:

* The Syrian regime has indicated its preference for Obama. Buthaina Shaaban, an adviser to President
Bashar al-Assad, has written: "The change suggested by Obama is essential not only for the U.S. but for
the entire human family." [You can find out about these guys on the net. It explains why they like
him.]

* Libyan leader Muammar al-Qaddafi called Obama "a Muslim" and said: "All the people in the
Arab and Muslim world and in Africa applauded this man. They welcome him and prayed for his success,"
although Qaddafi also expressed criticism of Obama's comments on the future of Jerusalem. [You can
find out about these guys on the net. It explains why they like him.]

* Hamas political adviser Ahmed Yousef said this year: "We like Mr. Obama and we hope that he will
win the election." [You do know who Hamas is, don't you?]

* Hezbollah's second in command, Sheik Naim al-Kassim, urged Americans to vote for Obama as a step
toward peace with Islam, and pro-Hezbollah columnist Amal Saad-Ghorayeb said there is "no doubt Arabs
should welcome an Obama presidency," according to Taheri. [You do know who Hezbollah is, don't
you?]

* In Saudi Arabia, commentator Hussein Shobokshi wrote that an Obama presidency "would mark an
important moral transformation in the superpower and is a healthy indicator of the long-awaited improvement
in the international arena."

Some columnists also have noted Obama's close ties to several Palestinian radicals, including Columbia
University Prof. Rashid Khalidi former communications director for the Palestinian Liberation Organization
and another Palestinian political activist, the late Edward Said. [Look up Rashid and the Palestinian
Liberation Organization's activities to see why they like Obama so much.]

The "Arab street" also favors Obama. Recent surveys found that he is the preferred candidate in
Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Algeria, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.

The 'Dumbing-Down' of our children
has been a resounding success.

To vote wisely, you need to make a list.

Column one, what Obama and McCain will do that is the same.
Column 2 what Obama will do that McCain won't.
Column 3 what McCain will do that Obama won't.

Throw away column 1 and then make your decision.
And don't tell me that none of the above is smart.

Voting for 'other than these two' screws us all.
It 'enables' someone foreign to your beliefs to be elected.
With McCain we have a chance, with Obama, we are screwed.

The Democrat media wing (aka National Public Radio) says Congressional approval is lower than
Bush's. Seems to me Nancy didn't get that memo. In fact, it seems Nancy is under the
impression that the Democrats are running against GWB in 2008, given how much time and energy they spend
trashing the guy leaving instead of focusing on the next one coming in. Poor, poor, pitiful Pelosi.

Her stick buddy in the Senate has similar delusions. In the same article, the Harry Reid is quoted
thusly:

"Who would be afraid of him?" Reid, D-Nev., said as many senators looked on. "He's got
a 29 percent approval rating."

( A-hem, that's a lot higher than your rating, or Pelosi's! )

What they have to show for their ... Uh ... "leadership in the majority" is a doubling of gas
prices, horrendous unemployment numbers, a crumbling economy, a war that has succeeded IN SPITE of their
sorry selves doing all they could to make it into a failure, and a bunch of renamed Post Offices?

Total failure? I think we know who that label really belongs to.

Did she ever compare Bushes stats with Jimmy Carter's? Wasn't he the one that got everyone
parroting "Bush is the worst..." when his record looks more like the one by the Democratic Congress
under Nancy Pelosi? And, Bushes approval rating is still 50% better than hers, or Reids, or Congress!

I am more worried about the travisty that Congress has put on us, and will continue to do than even if
Obama gets elected due to all those voting for Ron Paul. (ouch!)

AND, if you really think McCain is like GWB, then you wern't listening to him when he was running
against GWB for the party nominations a few years back.

Where are all these idiots wanting more Democrats in Washington coming from? Or, are they just so
incredibly susceptible to hot air?