Can India afford to have one Capital ? That India has now one capital does not close the question.
If the Capital of India is not satisfactorily located, now is the time for considering the
question.

Since the departure of the British, India has
only one capital and that is Delhi. Before the British, India has always had two capitals.
During the Moghal period, India had Delhi as one Capital
and Shrinagar in Kashmir as another Capital. When the
British came they too had two capitals, one was Calcutta and another was Simla. Even when
they left Calcutta for Delhi, they retained Simla as their summer Capital. The two
capitals maintained by the Moghuls and by the British were
the results of climatic conditions. Neither the British nor the Moghuls were able to live in Delhi
or in Calcutta continuously for 12 months. The summer months in Delhi were unbearable to
the Moghuls. They made Shrinagar their second capital for summer months. The summer months
in Calcutta were equally unbearable to the British. They, therefore, established a second
capital. To these climatic conditions must now be added three other conditions. There was
no popular Government when the Moghuls ruled or when the British
ruled. Now we have popular Government and the convenience of the people is an important factor. Delhi is most inconvenient to the people of the
South. They suffer the most from cold as well as distance. Even the Northern people suffer
in the summer months. They do not complain because they are nearer home and they are
nearer the seat of power. Second is the feeling of the Southern people and the third is
the consideration of Defence. The feeling of the Southern people is that the Capital of
their Country is far away from them and that they are being
ruled by the people of Northern India. The third consideration is of course more
important. It is that Delhi is a vulnerable place. It is within bombing distance of the
neighbouring countries. Although India is trying to live in peace
with its neighbours it cannot be assumed that India will
not have to face war sometime or other and if war comes, the
Government of India will have to leave Delhi and find another place for its location. Which is the place to which the Government
of India can migrate ? A place that one can think of is
Calcutta. But Calcutta is also within bombing distance from Tibet. Although India and
China today are friends, how long the friendship would last no one can definitely say. The
possibility of conflict between India and China remains. In that event Calcutta would be
useless. The next town that could be considered as a refuge for the Central Government is Bombay. But Bombay is a port and our Indian Navy is
too poor to protect the Central Government if it came down
to Bombay. Is there a fourth place one could think of? I
find Hyderabad to be such a place. Hyderabad Secunderabad and Bolarum should
be constituted into a Chief Commissioner's Province and made a second capital of India.
Hyderabad fulfils all the requirements of a capital for India. Hyderabad is equidistant to
all States. Anyone who looks at the table of distances given below will realise it:

From Delhi  miles

From Hyderabad  miles

To Bombay

798

440

To Calcutta

868

715

To Madras

1198

330

To Karnul

957

275

To Trivandrum

1521

660

To Patiala

124

990

To Chandigarh

180

1045

To Lucknow

275

770

From the defence
point of view it would give safety to the Central Government. It is equidistant from all
parts of India. It would give satisfaction to the South Indian people that their
Government is sometimes with them. The Government may remain in
Delhi during winter months and during other months it can stay in Hyderabad. Hyderabad has
all the amenities which Delhi has and it is a far better
City than Delhi. It has all the grandeur which Delhi has.
Buildings are going cheap and they are really beautiful buildings, far superior to those
in Delhi. They are all on sale. The only thing that is wanting is a Parliament House which
the Government of India can easily build. It is a place in which Parliament can sit all
the year round and work, which it cannot do in Delhi. I do not see what objection there
can be in making Hyderabad a second capital of India. It
should be done right now while we are reorganising the States.

Hyderabad, Secunderabad and Bolarum should be constituted
into a second capital of India. Fortunately, it can be very
easily done with satisfaction to the whole of South India, to Maharashtra
and to the Andhras.

This is another remedy for easing the tension between the North and the South.