Do I have freedom FROM religion?

One word: Angels. There's already enough people of this belief-set, that an alien coming wouldn't phase them. And then there's the whole debates
over whether or not these creatures would need conversion or not. Christianity may try to live in bubble, sometimes, but we don't. So, no, although
it may change a few in the the big 3.

Thought you might find it fun that Richard Dawkins actually was for Bibles being sent to schools in England, with their taxpayer money.
Here:

Rapprochement would seem to be in the air –
until Dawkins's thesis is studied more closely. While Gove believes the Bible is a guide to morality, Dawkins is sure it is not. "I have heard the
cynically misanthropic opinion that without the Bible as a moral compass people would show no restraint against murder, theft and mayhem. The surest
way to disabuse yourself of this pernicious falsehood is to read the Bible itself," he says.

See, I could live with this. At leas then,
people have a public chance to be educated in it and make a decision for themselves. Got a coworker that was raised in a church, and is quite firmly
an Atheist. (He shuts down when you look like you are pushing him TO religion, but has no problem talking about religion when it doesn't sound like
a bunch of "you ought to".) So, having people taught things that they don't agree with doesn't change much of anything.

Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
I imagine most of the theists here can stroll through an atheist convention and leave with all their beliefs intact, without being influenced by
whatever they hear from atheists. So...just why do you seem so concerned about indoctrination in public places... from religious people?

Good point. Most of us can listen to a whole lecture by Dawkins and still have our belief in God intact, whereas with some of these folks you have the
impression that any hint of religiosity is dangerous to them. You'd have to be pretty weak minded for a "in God we trust" inscription somewhere to
plunge you into a crisis.

compared to the above let me know how a prayer is worse...please...its people like you that is the cause for PC garbage, putting stress on your
children leading to their need for anti-depressants...

Sniper

Being raised with the understanding that you're probably going to burn in hell would not only put me on anti-depressants, but I'd go with smoking
pot with a needle stuck in my arm.

Let's get one thing straight - it's religion that's garbage, not atheism. Religion is the foundation of all hatred thrown at homosexuals.
Masturbation is evil - really??? You want to know how prayer is worse than anything? Have a look at this pic. I'll bet these terrorists were praying
in their last moments of dying for allah.

Discussions of afterlife are for theology. its not a science, its not a math, its not language.

"Study of the afterlife is not science" and similar beliefs imposed by the "cult of reason" in the late 17th Century led to a separation of
religion and science. This separation causes the mass epidemic of ignorance atheists/humanists call "progress" and "social evolution". In a world
that has progressed in the true sense of thee word, studying the afterlife would be considered normal, natural, desirable.

Now to answer your title question; Hell No you don't have freedom from religion here in America and if the neo-con, bible thumping, right wing
conservative movement gets their way, it will only get worse. Let's not forget the "Blue Laws," where they restrict our ability to purchase
certain things on Sundays in order to enforce their religious standards on our masses? Why do you think it's against the law to purchase alcoholic
beverages before noon, (at least here in Texas) on Sundays? What a Joke!

If its that difficult to do without alcohol on Sunday morning, there are much deeper íssues that need addressing. Id applaud that law even if I were
an atheist.

Originally posted by SaturnFX
2 towers are missing from new york because of religious morality. Yay religious morals! please..teach us more..some of us are still breathing.

And then the usual logical distortion of guilt-by-association. The terrorists were not only muslims, they were also pilots...does that mean we have to
condemn or get rid of piloting as well?

Some of the Nazis were nurses...does that mean we should ban all nurses symbols from public?

The 9/11 perpetrators were about as much "muslim" and the salem witch burners about as much "christian" as stalin represents atheism.

Your talking points are superficial and illogical.

WHAT??? If these pilots were not of the muslim faith they wouldn't have done it. If they weren't brainwashed into believing in a dangerous fantasy
they wouldn't have done it. Oh, I just love how the religious can bend everything into pure insanity and then call everyone else insane. What a joke.

WHAT??? If these pilots were not of the muslim faith they wouldn't have done it. If they weren't brainwashed into believing in a dangerous fantasy
they wouldn't have done it. Oh, I just love how the religious can bend everything into pure insanity and then call everyone else insane. What a joke.

And what about the many BILLIONS of muslims that dont engage in terrorist acts?

It doesnt matter what they were...they would have done it if they were Hindus, Atheists or anything other. Atrocities have been committed by any and
every particular group.

You practice guilt-by-association because you are unable to tell the difference between things. You connect dots and assign false "causes". My kids
do this. The villain was a post office clerk so post office clerks must be bad.

You do not have freedom from religion because modern religion, at it's very core, was created to enslave you from it's inception. Why else are the
gods of the old never mentioned or, when they are, portrayed as evil or demonic? Why else would a 2000 year old book, that has stolen virtually
everything within it's texts from the old pagan and sumerian texts, deprive you of basic human rights such as sexual contact, while in the very same
sentence threatening you with enternal hell fire and pain? What God that is supposed to be almighty and pure would threaten his own creation? The fact
is, even those that practice modern religion have no idea what they're actually worshiping (and they are worshiping the religion not a certain God)
because they never actually read the book. There is no seperation between church and state because there is no seperation between religion and God.

WHAT??? If these pilots were not of the muslim faith they wouldn't have done it. If they weren't brainwashed into believing in a dangerous fantasy
they wouldn't have done it. Oh, I just love how the religious can bend everything into pure insanity and then call everyone else insane. What a joke.

And what about the many BILLIONS of muslims that dont engage in terrorist acts?

It doesnt matter what they were...they would have done it if they were Hindus, Atheists or anything other. Atrocities have been committed by any and
every particular group.

You practice guilt-by-association because you are unable to tell the difference between things. You connect dots and assign false "causes". My kids
do this. The villain was a post office clerk so post office clerks must be bad.

Don't even attempt to argue this point. Some people are so brainwashed by the propaganda that they actually hate the people not even the religion.
It's a race war more than a religious war now to them.

You argue the point for being free from the exposure of religion and many here would agree... yet what if someone wanted to be free from the exposure
of gays holding hands in the park or a lesbian parade...suddenly they would be decried as iggnorant, backward, and racist.

In part, that is the problem with the issue of Obama and healthcare...a choice... if you want insurance, fine. if you don't...fine. it's your
choice... only thing is with Obama-care we have no choice.

Many feel that religion is forced down there throats at every turn...many also feel that gay rights or Islam or fascism or socialism or global warming
is being rammed down their throats.

It's all about choices and the freedom to choose. As long as we have an open and free society, we will be exposed to things we agree with and things
we do not agree with. That is the beauty of freedom...the right to choose.

So, if you have a child and he/she asks why those people are going into that big building with a cross on top... you can explain and tell them why you
choose not to.

And, if you have a child and he/she asks why those two men are sitting over there kissing each other... you can explain and tell them why you choose
not to.

And, when you have a child and they want to know why you always get pickles and no tomato on your cheese burger... you can expalin and tell them why
you choose not to.

AUSTIN, Tex., Sept. 2— Laws mandating the use of seat belts and repealing the 24-year-old Texas blue law went into effect Sunday, three months
after the 1985 legislative session that approved the measures.

Supporters said the measure was aimed at discount houses, since it specifically prohibited sales of furniture, clothing, hardware and
appliances.

Did it ever occur to you that I may work offshore for weeks at a time and when I do get time off, I need to get my personal affairs done without the
imposition of your silly assed beliefs? This is about the involuntary imposition of religious beliefs into the lives of others. If you religious
fanatics don't want to buy # on Sundays, then don't! But stay the hell off my right to do so.

With respect to "In God We Trust" on our money, I have to ask; Would you be offended if the money you had to carry in your pocket had "In Allah We
Trust" printed on it? If your answer is "yes" or even "maybe," then you should be able to see the point of this thread. If your answer is
"no," then IMO, you are either delusional or in a state of denial.

Originally posted by Jagermeister
was created to enslave you from it's inception.

On the contrary. Religion was introduced to liberate humans from violent and barbaric conditions of pre-religious times.

Why else are the gods of the old never mentioned or, when they are, portrayed as evil or demonic?

Because the Gods of the old were barbaric themselves. No matter where you look in the world you will find these "Gods" demanding things such as
sacrificing children and other atrocious behavior too sick to mention.

Notice how you have the choice of hundred of soda flavors, but only 2 presidential candidates. Notice that you have the choice of 33 different ice
cream flavors, but only a handful of banks. Notice that you are never given a real choice when it comes to anything that actually means something.
That is America. The illusion of choice to keep people enslaved because people like yourself will run around and parrot propaganda the second anyone
notices the cage they've been raised in.

Not that long ago here in Texas, alcohol was just one of many things you couldn't purchase on Sundays and I'm talking about all day long.

So what? You you buy your stash for Sunday on Saturday. Some countries dont allow alcohol on ANY day.

I know atheists love their drugs as a religion-substitute, but doing a few hours without purchasing alcohol certainly wont do any harm.

If I were in Government I would not outlaw its purchase on Sunday morning, but I can think of more important issues than those continually brought
forth by atheists.

With respect to "In God We Trust" on our money, I have to ask; Would you be offended if the money you had to carry in your pocket had "In Allah We
Trust" printed on it?

If Im in a country where the majority believes in Allah and Allah was involved in building the nation, why would I be offended by it? Even if it were
on our Bills, why be offended by words? The mentality that throws a fit every time they see something that disagrees with their views is what needs to
be addressed.

WHAT??? If these pilots were not of the muslim faith they wouldn't have done it. If they weren't brainwashed into believing in a dangerous fantasy
they wouldn't have done it. Oh, I just love how the religious can bend everything into pure insanity and then call everyone else insane. What a joke.

And what about the many BILLIONS of muslims that dont engage in terrorist acts?

It doesnt matter what they were...they would have done it if they were Hindus, Atheists or anything other. Atrocities have been committed by any and
every particular group.

You practice guilt-by-association because you are unable to tell the difference between things. You connect dots and assign false "causes". My kids
do this. The villain was a post office clerk so post office clerks must be bad.

Ask an atheist pilot to crash a plane into a building (sacrificing his life) because he will be rewarded in heaven. Yeah, that'll happen. So NOOOOO,
they wouldn't have done it without a belief in their religion.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.