On MercatorNet from Italian sociologist Massimo Introvigne, whose books I have read with interest… I recommend his book on Hammas… comes this with my emphases and comments. The piece is on the long side, so I will give you just a bit of it.

Moral panic flares again

Is priestly paedophilia a problem? Yes, says an Italian sociologist. Is it a big problem? No.

Why is there talk again of paedophile priests, based on a case in Germany, which drags in people who are close to the Pope and now even the Pope himself? Does sociology have something to say about this or should we leave it completely to the journalists? I believe sociology has much to say, and it must not remain silent because of a fear of displeasing some.

The current discourse on paedophile priests – considered from a sociological perspective – represents a typical example of "moral panic". The concept was coined in the 1970s to explain how certain problems become the subject of "social hyperconstruction". More precisely, [NB] moral panics are defined as socially constructed problems that are characterised by a systematic amplification of the true facts in the media or in political discourse.

Two other characteristics have been cited as typical of moral panics. First, problems that have existed for decades are reconstructed in the media and political accounts as new or as the subject of a recent dramatic increase. Second, their incidence is exaggerated by statistics plucked from the air which, while not confirmed by academic studies, are repeated by the media and inspire persistent media campaigns. Historian and sociologist Philip Jenkins, of Pennsylvania State University, has emphasised the role of "moral entrepreneurs" in the creation and management of panics whose agenda is not always revealed. [I don’t know about you, but I think this is really interesting…] Moral panics do not bring any good. They distort the perception of the problems and compromise the efficacy of the measures which should resolve them. After a harmful analysis inevitably there comes a harmful intervention. [Consider how the media has reconstructed a wrong from decades ago into a huge issue today, both ignoring what the Church has actually done and even making what the Church is doing more difficult.]

Let there be no misunderstanding: at the origin of moral panics are objective and real dangers. They do not invent a problem; they exaggerate its statistical dimensions. In a series of excellent studies, Jenkins demonstrated how the issue of paedophile priests is perhaps the most typical moral panic. Two characteristic elements exist: a fact which serves as a starting point, and an exaggeration of this fact by moral entrepreneurs.

[…]

But there have also been many sensational cases of priests who have been falsely accused. Indeed, these cases multiplied in the 1990s, when some legal firms recognised they could reap million dollar returns even on the basis of mere suspicion. Appeals for zero tolerance are justifiable, but there should also be zero tolerance for defaming innocent priests. Nor do the numbers change significantly from 2002 to 2010. The John Jay College study already noted a "significant decline" in cases in the 2000s. New investigations have been rare, and sentences extremely rare, as a result of more rigorous controls introduced by American bishops as well as the Holy See.

So, does the John Jay College study tells us then, as one often reads, that 4 percent of American priests are paedophiles? Not at all. According to the research, 78.2 percent of the accusations involved minors who had advanced beyond puberty. Having sexual relations with a 17-year-old is certainly not a beautiful thing, and much less so for a priest, but it is not paedophilia. Therefore, only 958 American priests were accused of true paedophilia over 52 years, 18 per year. There were only 54 convictions, a little less than one per year. [The statistics, therefore, point to this as a homosexual issue.]

[…]

[QUAERITUR:]Why are old and very often well-known cases being exhumed in 2010 on a daily basis, always attacking the Pope? [By, in primis, Hell’s Bible… the New York Times…] This is paradoxical if one considers the great severity of then Cardinal Ratzinger and of Benedict XVI on this very theme. The moral entrepreneurs who organise the panic[I think that is a phrase you should remember] have an agenda which is increasingly clear and which is not essentially the protection of children. [EXACTLY! And I have made that point here. They are not interested in protecting children. Read this next part carefully….] This is a time when political, juridical and even electoral decisions in Europe and elsewhere are being made about the abortion pill RU-486, euthanasia, the recognition of same sex unions. Only the voice of the Pope and the Church is being raised to defend life and the family. The reading of certain articles in the media shows that very powerful lobby groups are seeking to silence this voice with the worst possible defamation — and unfortunately an easy one to make — that of favouring or tolerating paedophilia. [That has the ring of truth.]

These more or less Masonic lobby groups show the sinister power of technocracy which was raised by Benedict XVI himself in his encyclical Caritas in veritate and in the denunciation of John Paul II, in his Message for the World Day of Peace of 1985. They warned of "hidden aims" – alongside others which are "openly promoted" which are "directed at subjecting all populations to regimes in which God does not count".

This is truly a dark hour. It takes one back to the prediction of a great Italian Catholic thinker of the 19th century, Emiliano Avogadro della Motta (1798-1865). [NB:] He predicted that after the devastation caused by secular ideologies [the 20th century rise of totalitarianism and world wars]an authentic "demon worship" would spring up [! I think we can find some examples of that now.] which would attack the family and the true concept of marriage. [The rise of aggressive homosexuality.] Reestablishing the sociological truth about moral panics over priests and paedophilia will not of itself resolve the problems and will not stop the lobby groups. But it is a small and proper tribute to the greatness of this Pope and to a Church which is wounded and defamed because they will not be silent on the issues of life and the family.

Well puy! The sexual abuse of minors is not something confined to the Catholic priesthood, either. Nonetheless, no one expresses consistent outrage against any other institution in the world than the Catholic Church. That said, the “organized moral panic” created by the media has less to do about priestly abuse and more about an organized panic against the influence of the Pope and the Catholic Church on the world. In other words, the media and others who disagree with the Church are afraid of the moral authority only she can carry.

The forces of Good, (the Church) vs. Evil (the Devil)have been a part of human history from the beginning of time and will continue to exist until Judgment Day. Right now, the Devil is having a field day from the “smoke” with which he has polluted the Church, which has caused some very bad behavior on the part of some clergy, religious and laity. But, as Christ said, “Take courage, for I have overcome the world,” and “I will be with you always, even until the end of time.” Good will ultimately triumph over the Evil One; we just might have to undergo a lot of suffering, penance, and purification for it.

Sociological panics? That’s great social science theory to explain group behavior. But, history is instructive in that the Church has always had its enemies who were all too willing to capitalize on its members’ sins with the goal of undermining the holiness of the Catholic Church. In the past, however, much of this was notorious—related to heresy—and battled out in the public realm.

What is different in the case of allegations of pedophilia (which, in most cases, was ephebophilia) is the issue secrecy, like Eve and Adam in the Garden. There is no doubt that some Church leaders (including cardinals, archbishops, bishops, pastors, and provincials of religious orders/congregations) covered up/hid/denied the facts of what is nothing other than completely reprehensible and immoral behavior (and, in many instances, involved their chums during the “Golden Age of U.S. Seminaries” in the late-1940s, 1950s, and 1960s). This is the U.S. Catholic Church’s self-inflicted Achilles heel that provides its enemies their fodder to exploit in any way they wish.

The sad irony today is that what the Roman Catholic Church in the United States has inflicted upon itself and should serve as an abject lesson for others to learn from is spreading…Ireland and Germany today and, I suspect, the Roman Catholic Church of the EU sooner rather than later too, as more and more cases are made public. Why are these prelates not learning how NOT to proceed? All they are doing is feeding the sociological panic of the type that Dr. Massimo Introvigne discusses. [Great point.]

However, there’s more at work here than Dr. Introvigne’s sociological analysis suggests. The Church’s enemies have sunk their teeth into a what is nothing other than a great issue for them to tear down the Church: its leaders’ hypocrisy. That’s a very difficult, if not impossible charge to counteract when your mission is one of moral clarity and those charged with proclaiming that moral clarity with the greatest amount of moral clarity have implicated themselves directly in the cover up/hiding/denial. The only thing that will begin to counteract this evil, as Benedict XVI wrote to the Irish bishops, is for the ordained to re-connect to their spiritual roots, confess, and atone for the sins of commission and omission. “In my weakness is my strength,” St. Paul noted.

Only today, I’ve read that the Archbishop of Canterbury is lecturing the Roman Catholic Church about its leaders’ failures. This only feeds those who are exploiting the frenzied sociological panic, and I wouldn’t be surprised that this is nothing other than “pay back” on the part of the Rev. Dr. Williams for Benedict XVI’s invitation to disaffected Anglicans. Anyone who knows anything about the Anglican and Episcopalian denominations can only believe that the Rev. Dr. Williams ought be extremely careful about the ground he is treading: the problem is not limited to the Roman Catholic Church…and he knows it. The Rev. Dr. Williams’ words are very likely to come back and haunt him one day.

Someone asked me once “what is it?”…. I’ve been searching. And I keep saying “it is what it is”…. Is this part of IT! No, this is all of IT. Good vs Evil. The evil one attacking the family. Right on! Fr. Z. I love our pope!

Too bad the main stream media will not point to logical and intelligent writers such as this one, or articles such as the one that you posted yesterday, Father, from the Lutheran theologian. Good article in your link, shane, and I agree, Anita – why would the Masons be any less of an evil threat than they used to be.

Ih. Amplification nothing. Go wade into ocean of scum: the thousands of pages of actual chancery documents over at Bishop Accountability. The facts speak for themselves: For decades, including recent decades, there was both systematic abuse of children by members of the clergy and religious orders and extensive conspiracy to conceal the crimes by the episcopate and church administration. The story keeps rebounding because it is the utmost betrayal of the trust of parishioners—and of their dollars. This is not a panic, it disgust with (and yes, perhaps schadenfreude over) with church concerning the facts.

Also, the bit about the Masons strikes me as silly there’s an external criminal conspiracy to expose Catholic bishops into criminal conspirators? I think as you’ve said before, Rev. Zuhlsdorf, let the truth out and the chips fall where they may, and the Church can move on. Statements like last week’s from the Vatican are only prolonging its misery.

I’d like to address your broad brush dripping with tar. I realize and accept the fact that the majority of the abusers are guilty of same-sex rape. It does not follow, however, that the problem is one of homosexuality. You are guilty of a post hoc ergo propter hoc error here. The problem is acts of rape and sexual aggression on children and teens. Other factors may explain the preponderance (n.b. not the exclusivity) of the homosexual nature of these crimes. To name a few:

An all-male culture such as the Catholic clergy may be (or, may have been?) disproportionately attractive to homosexuals;

In addition to attracting people with religious fervor, the role of clergy often attracts people who themselves have backgrounds of abuse or personality disorders that result in unhealthy desires for control, respect, etc (this is part of the reason for psych batteries prior to admission to seminary).

Not all of such attacks on children and teens were by abusers who exhibited fixation on children as a primary sexual motive. That is to say, not all (though certainly some) were pedophiles or hebephiles in a clinical understanding of those words but were motivated by other reasons. It follows then that because there was more opportunity for abusers to spend time with boys rather than girls (training altar boys, running boys groups, etc.) that there was more likelihood that boys rather than girls would be victimized by this type of predator. (In the literature I’ve read about this, this type of perpetrator is often called “regressive” rather than “fixated”.)

I won’t go on, though I really can for quite a while. I think it’s well to be careful and open-eyed about the complexities that drive these criminals, and the situations and institutional cultures in which they are able to thrive. It seems to me from my reading to be something much larger than “disordered sexuality.”

Excellent example was the ‘child abuse at day care centers’ in the 1980s, where people were prosecuted for acts which could not possibly have been committed, yet there were convictions. The Amiraults in Boston are the leading example, as is a day care center in the state of Washington.

Here, the process is being used, and the elephant in the room is the strict enforcement of the code: Even if 80% of the cases were same sex, it’s not reallly homosexual.

Hence, the free pass that Homosexualist Bp Rembert Weakland is getting from the Homosexualist NYT

He’s completely right. We’ve been through a bunch of moral panics, which often have a much smaller basis of reality than they seem. The Toyota thing is perhaps such a moral panic, as is global warming and as was the whole child picture on a milk carton thing in the 80s. Oh and the king of all moral panics- Y2K! Who can forget Y2K?

I believe that moral panics are used to try to change society by political & social groups. Sometimes they’re successful, but sometimes we get a sort of absurdity which many people don’t pick up on. Such tactics can fractionalize society and we’ve suffered that many times.

The fact of the matter is, as the author says, in essence small but real. The great majority of priests don’t abuse anyone, but a small few do. The idea is what has captivated people. And the fact that the small few weren’t dealt with properly is the key that makes the whole thing eminently exploitable. Sort of like Toyota’s lying, whether that was intentional or not. It’s something that must be avoided if possible because the consequences can be so great.

There are only 2 explanations for the predominance of boys as victims in the John Jay report & all the other documentation:
a) it was homosexual in nature
b) it was acting out with boys because boys were the only moving objects in proximity (as you have stated)

People don’t want to admit a) for reasons of political correctness, (and sometimes because of their own sexual disorders).
However, if b) is the case, then it means that a certain small number of men were so desperate and evil that they were willing to rape anyone upright and moving just to satisfy their lust.

HOW, BY ANY POSSIBLE METRIC, COULD THIS HAVE BEEN BETTER THAN THE FIRST EXPLANATION????????

The Vatican has got to get the lead out and learn to move faster. The excuses are getting very old. And they’re digging themselves deeper and deeper by missing things wholesale until they can’t be changed.

Nothing is worse than being a pederast, and nothing is worse than being falsely accused of being a pederast.

But there have also been many sensational cases of priests who have been falsely accused. Indeed, these cases multiplied in the 1990s, when some legal firms recognised they could reap million dollar returns even on the basis of mere suspicion.

Yes, once the damage in Boston came to light, the stage was set for a moral panic. But it started with the abuse in Boston, and it spread because I’ll wager there’s scarcely a Catholic alive who doesn’t know somebody this has touched in some way.

Organized moral panic = attempt to foist a culture of collective guilt, fear and paranoia on the Catholic Church.

Collective guilt is not healthy and it is not what the Church teaches. Collective guilt is nobody’s guilt, it’s a secular ritual that is creeping into the Church. In the Church we are to confess our own sins, not those of Mr. X from 1970, especially if we weren’t born yet. Please correct me if I’m wrong.

“According to the research, 78.2 percent of the accusations involved minors who had advanced beyond puberty.”
I am confused about this number. According to the John Jay Study and recent CARA report, the largest group is KIDS between the ages of 10-14. Now, on the USCCB’s website, when they are breaking this down, pedophilia includes those children up to age 10 where ephopilia include teenagers over 14 (maybe 13). I have written USCCB to see where these children are being included. I am still waiting on a response. I would not put kids 10-14 in advanced teenagers group. BUT if you include the younger children and the 10-14 – then you get 70 + % each time whereas the older teenagers were something like 16%.

I totally agree that we aren’t to panic. Of course, the pain will still be there because some of this is just horrible beyond belief and we are just realizing the abuse that has gone on.
For one thing, as a parent, it makes me more aware, more wanting to know what is going on with our children IN ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, not just our parish. May God help us all.

Here is the John Jay Study
• The largest group of alleged victims (50.9%) was between the ages of 11 and 14, 27.3% were 15-17, 16% were 8-10 and nearly 6% were under age 7. Overall, 81% of victims were male and 19% female. Male victims tended to be older than female victims. Over 40% of all victims were males between the ages of 11 and 14.

Keeping in mind, boys do not hit puberty till around 14 – well behind girls.

Here is the CARA for this year:
More than half of the victims (54 percent) were
between the ages of 10 and 14 when the alleged abuse
began. A quarter (23 percent) were between the ages
of 15 and 17, while 15 percent were younger than age
10. The age could not be determined for 9 percent of
victims.

The abuse allegations have been tapering off with this year the least – keep in mind those that came forward a majority were from previous years (they are now adults). But also keep in mind, that sometimes children won’t talk or tell so we need to be eyes and ears too.

Catholicmidwest, the problem is rape and sexual aggression with children perpetrated by adults. Both heterosexuals and homosexuals can with minimal effort find willing adult sexual partners–there is no shortage. Exploiting children for sexual gratification is a pathology.

In the majority, Catholic clerics who committed these crimes committed them with same-sex victims. This abuse was not exclusively homosexual. Most abused boys, some abused boys and girls, some abused girls. This pattern is at odds with the general incidence of sexual abuse of minors; girls are much more likely to be victims of sexual abuse by an adult.

So what then explains the anomalous nature of clergy sex abuse? Any number of things, some of which I pointed at earlier. Maybe consecrated life was more attractive to abusers in general; maybe it was more attractive to homosexuals in general and therefore attracted a disproportionate number of gay abusers; maybe there are things about the culture of priestly life that fostered problems. Dr Gregory Herek, a research psychologist in homosexuality at UC Davis, warns us to distinguish between the genders involved in an abusive act and the sexual orientation of the perpetrator, eg. it may be a male-male incident but not necessary homosexual in nature. Why? “The distinction between a victim’s gender and a perpetrator’s sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don’t really have an adult sexual orientation.”

That’s a charge that’s been levied many, many times at clerics and religious celibates in general–I heard it plenty levied at me when I was a seminarian. Perhaps the charge is unfair for many or most, fair but unproblematical for others. And for a fraction who abuse children, quite fairly and a serious problem indeed. I can certainly relate anecdotal evidence during my time as a seminarian of profoundly sexually confused or naive people with whom I shared a roof. In my narrow experience, this was a fact that often exasperated me and which I had many interior forum discussions with my spiritual advisors about. I digress.

As anyone would hope, profiling the likelihood of a population to become child rapists is a topic of immense interest to psychology. Psychology wants to understand these people so people with these inclinations can identified before children are harmed. Thus far, what has been shown, repeatedly, is that homosexuals do not have a higher incidence of erotic preference for children.

And just in case you’re wondering, I’ll volunteer that I am not gay, nor was I sexually victimized as a child by a priest or any other adult. And as a nonbeliever, I really don’t object to the Vatican barring homosexuals from ordination–the less inclusive the Catholic Church becomes, the less influential in my opinion, and that fine with me.

I just think it is very important that we understand the profile of these criminals, the types of environments and cultures in which they thrive, and ways of preventing them from being in positions where exploitation is facilitated. If homosexuality empirically cannot be shown by science to be the etiology of the problem of clergy sex abuse of minors, or even if it can be shown not to be the most important etiology, we must protect our young people by focusing our preventive efforts on those things that are the major causes. The cost of not getting prevention right is tremendous wasted human potential, destroyed lives, untold pain and even suicides–and this is unacceptable. I’m sure you agree with that sentiment.

“The distinction between a victim’s gender and a perpetrator’s sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don’t really have an adult sexual orientation. They have never developed the capacity for mature sexual relationships with other adults, either men or women. Instead, their sexual attractions focus on children – boys, girls, or children of both sexes.”

PostCatholic
Thank you for saying this:
“The distinction between a victim’s gender and a perpetrator’s sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don’t really have an adult sexual orientation.”
There seems to be almost a push to make this or that problem (homosexual) when it is a little more complicated than that.
I do not think the ban of active gays in the seminary will or should go away. It needed to be cleaned.
But, these that abuse the children are of a different strip and it has to do with maturity – sexual maturity which for what I have seen, seminaries are addressing this.
This is a good thing.

And if you think those bishops were few in number, think again. Many dioceses had at least one continuing problem, and that problem almost always wasn’t dealt with til the lawyers and the press arrived on the scene.

So what then explains the anomalous nature of clergy sex abuse? Any number of things, some of which I pointed at earlier.

a) Maybe consecrated life was more attractive to abusers in general;

Reply: Yes, perhaps they thought it would give them cover, and they were right. Being a priest for most of the 20th century was to be beyond criticism for many Catholics, NO MATTER WHAT THE PRIEST DID. This is wrong.

b) maybe it was more attractive to homosexuals in general and therefore attracted a disproportionate number of gay abusers;

Reply: Apparently true. Probably because, for these few people, it provided cover, a steady supply of subjects to abuse, and other gays to commiserate with.

c) maybe there are things about the culture of priestly life that fostered problems. Dr Gregory Herek, a research psychologist in homosexuality at UC Davis, warns us to distinguish between the genders involved in an abusive act and the sexual orientation of the perpetrator, eg. it may be a male-male incident but not necessary homosexual in nature. Why? “The distinction between a victim’s gender and a perpetrator’s sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don’t really have an adult sexual orientation.”

Reply: So you’re telling me that these people are so depraved that, lacking an adult orientation, they will literally rape anything that moves. Again, I ask, BY ANY METRIC WHATSOEVER, HOW IS THIS BETTER THAN THE OBVIOUS EXPLANATION, WHICH IS THAT THEY WERE CHICKEN HAWKS????

The last post should have had some quotes. I was replying to Post Catholic in his post at 10:26PM Last night. I don’t think you’ve said anything new, PostCatholic. I just think you like to make a short explanation longer.

Another thing: It’s really necessary to look at both the means and the ends, when looking at moral arguments. You’re stuck on the means, PostCatholic.

These people may have done what they did for a lot of reasons, which all seem to boil down to a small handful of similar motivations–lust, disordered personalities, opportunity, and so on.

The OUTCOME, however, is clear, both in terms of the carnage among those young people who were affected and in terms of the outrage we are facing now. The fact that Catholics don’t seem to GET that is part of what’s fueling the outrage.

We could go a long way toward making this better if we didn’t engage in the graphic display of whining we’re putting on. It’s starting to become unbelievable out there, folks. Dealing with the problem with some degree of class would be much better and much more believable.

I don’t read that statement as they’re “so depraved that, lacking an adult orientation, they will literally rape anything that moves.” Rather, I think it’s saying that these criminals are so immature as to not be able to enter into adult sexual relationships and therefore resort to exploitative measure to obtain their sexual gratification. So how do we recognize that immaturity? Is there anything we do anything about it? What is the nexus between that and homosexuality? If homosexuality does not cause people to be child sexual abusers, as medicine seems tells us that it doesn’t, what does and what is the Catholic church going to do about it? It can do whatever it likes about homosexuals in its clergy for all I care, on whatever grounds it believes about the immorality of homosexuality, but that still leaves the problem of high incidence of sexual predation by clergy to address.

One implication of this finding about the maturity of abusers, is that in order to live a psychologically healthy adult life and choose to be celibate, one needs to have formed a mature sexuality and to have tamed mature sexual attractions. When I was in seminary in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, there no talk about how to manage a celibate lifestyle and the natural impulses beyond “pray and go to confession” unless one was lucky enough, as I was, to have someone to talk to on the internal forum who could give concrete guidance. If people don’t or can’t “grow up” to have a normal sexuality, it isn’t enough that we trust them to be celibate.

There are of course other many things that need correction–screening for personality disorders and mental health pathologies (I was screened once, prior to seminary entrance, at age 17. No priest I know ever underwent a testing battery unless and until there was a problem. If my experience is still typical, it’s not nearly enough.), a culture alert to the safety needs of children and aware of what is inappropriate attention, administrators who are decisive and just in their actions. If the Catholic church sincerely wants to protect children, it will take an intellectually honest look at what causes people to prey on children and act on those findings.

“Chicken Hawk” is a British & American gay slang word for older males who prefer younger males for partners.

It is a very real trend among some in the gay community. That there is term for it further evidences its existence.

The phrase does not necessarily imply merely adolescent boys. It also includes younger looking young men.

In seminary & religious life certain priests are/were known ‘chicken hawks’. Why so little was done about it is beyond me.

Michael Rose was not wrong when he described them in “Goodbye Good Men”. The stories he related in that book about ‘chicken hawks’ run true with my own experiences in religious formation. There is a reason I left Jesuit formation.

PostCatholic, “these criminals are so immature as to not be able to enter into adult sexual relationships and therefore resort to exploitative measure to obtain their sexual gratification” is the same thing as “sticking it to anything that doesn’t get away fast enough.” Same, same. What planet are you on anyway????

And the end result is also the same: man on boy. And by any imaginable metric, this isn’t better than homosexual man on boy. If anything, it’s WORSE. IT means the perpetrator not only is SITUATIONALLY HOMOSEXUAL but personally SCREWED UP to boot!! HOW, HOW, HOW did no one in the seminary notice???? Were they not paying attention or what? One wonders what they were like too, ahem.

I think it’s a bit more nuanced than that, catholicmidwest. After all, these monsters were in our midst for a long time and the bishops succeeded in keeping their secrets.

Earth.

HOW, HOW, HOW did no one in the seminary notice???? Were they not paying attention or what? One wonders what they were like too, ahem.

Bingo. Here’s a tale of what transpired in the non-distant at the now-defunct St. Pius X Diocesan Seminary in the Diocese of Scranton. You’d think the handling of that would be enough to shake the confidence in keeping such a rector in place, but nope. He went on to become faculty at North American College in Rome and presently rector of Scranton’s cathedral.

Earth to PostCatholic, rape is rape. Homosexual rape is homosexual rape. Homosexual statutory rape is homosexual statutory rape. NO MATTER WHETHER THE PERP IS CRAZY, DELUDED, IMMATURE, [FILL-IN-THE-BLANK] OR NOT. OKAY, if the perp is crazy enough, what you really can get is homosexual statutory rape with a twist of pure evil thrown in for kicks. How about that? Better? NO!

And now that you mention it, isn’t that a little bit of a puzzle that SOME (not all) bishops didn’t even seem to mind? Hmmm. I wonder why??? Hmmmmm. One of those bishops was Rembert Weakland, wasn’t it? Hmmmm.

I believe you about the rector. That’s the part of the scandal that we don’t have any handle on yet.

I should qualify that: There have been some investigations of seminaries and some have closed. I’m not sure where the people responsible for the mischief went, when seminaries were closed, however. I’m not confident that many were laicized and taken off the payroll, which is what should have happened.

Aren’t we saying the same thing, catholicmidwest? The problem is the rape and sexual abuse of children. Whether it’s male-male, male-female or female-female does not matter. The problem to solve is horrendous violence against children, not homosexuality. Understanding where child sexual predators come from, knowing how to identify them and confounding their opportunities to harm others is the task to which Catholics need to address themselves.

I am saying that the crazy, deluded, immature bit is part of how we identify these bastards and keep them from harming children, so it does matter. What doesn’t matter in this respect is whether they’re straight or gay–that doesn’t indicate their likeliness to hurt children. Perhaps it matters for doctrinal reasons to Catholicism, but that is a different matter.

Archbishop Weakland was an embezzler, not a rapist–a fact that still disgusts me. St. Pius closed for the quotidian reason that it lacked the funds and the students to keep it open. Which seminaries were closed after investigations? I hadn’t heard of that and I’d like to learn.

It does matter, PostCatholic. It’s a fact that man-boy sex was the mode 80% of the time, whether you want to admit it or not. So stop trying to cover it up.

Rob Cartusciello, whose post appears at 12:06PM (above), mentioned a book by Michael Rose. Have you read it? It will fill you in on details so you can stop supposing you know what happened. The contents have been corroborated by many people as likely. It’s a good read and the story, if not this particular book, will be a part of 20th century Catholic history.

Okay, so Weakland’s main squeeze was an adult, meaning only that he wasn’t a little kid. You win on Abp Weakland, like it makes it any better. He was also an embezzler, yes, and a lying one, when he said none of the money came from donations. I remember laughing at the time and wondering what OTHER business he was in that I didn’t know about. The mind boggles.

I can tell you that up until recently, it wasn’t really published knowledge what reasons were when seminaries closed, although something like “not enough enrollment” was usually given as a reason. For some of them, however, that was not the reason.

Again, I would refer you to Michael Rose’s book. And Google.

I see that the Vatican, however, closed a seminary in Austria in 2004, giving the correct reason, so maybe they’re learning something. Now, if they’d only figure out how to take names so that these people don’t re-invent themselves and come back someplace else, eh?

I have the Rose book. Its scholarship was bothering me and I didn’t finish it, although like Rob Cartusciello the stories rang true. (It has a lengthy account of the American College of Louvain; I had some similar observations at St Patrick’s College in Maynooth). I’ll have to take it up again. Actually, the original subtitle of that book was something like “How the church turned away two generations of vocations.”

It’s hard to write a book on something like that, PostCatholic. Michael Rose took, and still takes, a lot of heat for telling the story that some people desperately didn’t want to hear. But so many people have corroborated the events and events like them, that I no longer doubt it. In addition, it’s the only thing that matches what I see in front of my face. I’m in Michigan.

I’ve been to that closed seminary in Michigan that Michael Rose talks about, for an overnight meeting with another group. It’s still maintained as a retreat/conference center. It doesn’t get much business, I’m told. My impressions of the place were tied up with its grand size and its deep creepiness, especially since I had become aware of what happened there long before I went. In this part of the country, some of this isn’t really that much of a secret.

I believe the anecdotes and events Rose relates. I have my own tales to add to the pile very like them from my not-at-all liberal seminaries, and I’ve already pointed you to a Federal judge’s findings at one of them which is an analog. What I took issue with in the book were statistical and contextual research that I thought was tendentious and understated. I’ll start reading the book again soon on your recommendation; maybe I was hasty.

Funny you mention the grand size and creepiness of the seminary. I recall St John’s Seminary in Boston being referred to as “Transylvania.” The hardest thing for me about living at St. Pius X Seminary outside of Scranton was the darkness the mostly-empty building kept in to save electricity; the silence and gloominess had a real impact on my mood. The seminary experience must have been very different for the generation ahead of me that lived in full and well-maintained buildings. Maybe that’s part of how the monsters passed through them unnoticed.

Search Fr. Z’s Blog

Search for:

BACK TO SCHOOL SHOPPING? Please, come here first!

Enter Amazon through my search box and I will get a small percentage of what you spend. (Pssst - Can't see the search box? Turn off your "ad-blocker" for this site!)Amazon.com WidgetsPS: I added Amazon Search Boxes for the UK and for Canada at the bottom of the blog page. Copy and paste titles I mention into those boxes and - BAZINGA! - results appear as if by magic.
Kindle? HERE

“This blog is like a fusion of the Baroque ‘salon’ with its well-tuned harpsichord around which polite society gathered for entertainment and edification and, on the other hand, a Wild West “saloon” with its out-of-tune piano and swinging doors, where everyone has a gun and something to say. Nevertheless, we try to point our discussions back to what it is to be Catholic in this increasingly difficult age, to love God, and how to get to heaven.” – Fr. Z

Some words of wisdom…

The more vigorously the primacy was displayed, the more the question came up about the extent and and limits of [papal] authority, which of course, as such, had never been considered. After the Second Vatican Council, the impression arose that the pope really could do anything in liturgical matters, especially if he were acting on the mandate of an ecumenical council. Eventually, the idea of the givenness of the liturgy, the fact that one cannot do with it what one will, faded from the public consciousness of the West. In fact, the First Vatican Council had in no way defined the pope as an absolute monarch. On the contrary, it presented him as the guarantor of obedience to the revealed Word. The pope's authority is bound to the Tradition of faith. … The authority of the pope is not unlimited; it is at the service of Sacred Tradition.

CLICK and say your Daily Offering!

"We as Catholics have not properly combated (the culture) because we have not been taught our Catholic Faith, especially in the depth needed to address these grave evils of our time. This is a failure of catechesis both of children and young people that has been going on for fifty years. It is being addressed, but it needs much more radical attention... What has also contributed greatly to the situation is an exaltation of the virtue of tolerance which is falsely seen as the virtue which governs all other virtues. In other words, we should tolerate other people in their immoral actions to the extent that we seem also to accept the moral wrong. Tolerance is a virtue, but it is certainly not the principal virtue; the principal virtue is charity... Charity means speaking the truth. I have encountered it (not speaking the truth) many times myself as a priest and bishop. It is something we simply need to address. There is far too much silence — people do not want to talk about it because the topic is not 'politically correct.' But we cannot be silent any longer."

Help Monks in Wyoming (coffee) and Norcia (beer)!

出る杭は打たれ!

Without you, there is no blog.

There is a subscription form at the bottom of this page!

Aedificantium enim unusquisque gladio erat accinctus.

- Nehemiah 4:18

"Where priest and people together face the same way, what we have is a cosmic orientation and also in interpretation of the Eucharist in terms of resurrection and trinitarian theology. Hence it is also an interpretation in terms of parousia, a theology of hope, in which every Mass is an approach to the return of Christ."

"In those situations where homosexual unions have been legally recognized or have been given the legal status and rights belonging to marriage, clear and emphatic opposition is a duty. ... If all Catholics are obliged to oppose the legal recognition of homosexual unions, Catholic politicians are obliged to do so in a particular way, in keeping with their responsibility as politicians." CDF 2003

One of the most dangerous errors is that civilization is automatically bound to increase and spread. The lesson of history is the opposite; civilization is a rarity, attained with difficulty and easily lost. The normal state of humanity is barbarism, just as the normal surface of the planet is salt water. Land looms large in our imagination and civilization in history books, only because sea and savagery are to us less interesting.
— C. S. Lewis

Ham Radio Stuff

Fr. Z - W9FRZ - OFFQRV on: 00m 00000
Check Echolink WB0YLE-R - OFF

For contemplation…

"One of the few things in life you can be absolutely sure about is that, if Management tells you it doesn't like your Tone, you are getting something right."

"Latin is a precise, essential language. It will be abandoned, not because it is unsuitable for the new requirements of progress, but because the new men will not be suitable for it. When the age of demagogues and charlatans begins, a language like Latin will no longer be useful, and any oaf will be able to give a speech in public and talk in such a way that he will not be kicked off the stage. The secret to this will consist in the fact that, by making use of words that are general, elusive, and sound good, he will be able to speak for an hour without saying anything. With Latin, this is impossible."

- - Giovanni Guareschi

Support them with prayer and fasting.

Click for Car Magnets

Help the Sisters. They have a building project. Get great soap (gifts, etc.) while helping REAL nuns!

Some OBLIGATORY reading…

Leave Voice Mail for Fr. Z

Nota bene: I do not answer these numbers or this Skype address. You won't get me "live". I check for messages regularly.

WDTPRS

020 8133 4535

651-447-6265

Let us pray…

Grant unto thy Church, we beseech
Thee, O merciful God, that She, being
gathered together by the Holy Ghost, may
be in no wise troubled by attack from her
foes.
O God, who by sin art offended and by
penance pacified, mercifully regard the
prayers of Thy people making supplication
unto Thee,and turn away the scourges of
Thine anger which we deserve for our sins.
Almighty and Everlasting God, in
whose Hand are the power and the
government of every realm: look down upon
and help the Christian people that the heathen
nations who trust in the fierceness of their
own might may be crushed by the power of
thine Arm. Through our Lord Jesus Christ,
Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee
in the unity of the Holy Ghost, God, world
without end. R. Amen.

Check out the Cardinal Newman Society feed!

Yes, Fr. Z is taking ads…

A great hymnal…

Mystic Monk Coffee also has TEA!

Because it matters what children read…

I carry one of these super-strong rosaries in my spare mag pouch! The Swiss Guards have them too!

The Swiss Guard have these rosaries!For the story clickHERE and HERE (esp. 18:00)

Because you don’t know when you are going to need to move fast or get along without the supermarket…

My wish lists

Main Wishlist Kindle WishlistAudio WishlistHam Radio ListNEW

Food For Thought

“The legalization of the termination of pregnancy is none other than the authorization given to an adult, with the approval of an established law, to take the lives of children yet unborn and thus incapable of defending themselves. It is difficult to imagine a more unjust situation, and it is very difficult to speak of obsession in a matter such as this, where we are dealing with a fundamental imperative of every good conscience — the defense of the right to life of an innocent and defenseless human being.”

For your consideration…

"One of the most dangerous errors is that civilization is automatically bound to increase and spread. The lesson of history is the opposite; civilization is a rarity, attained with difficulty and easily lost. The normal state of humanity is barbarism, just as the normal surface of the planet is salt water. Land looms large in our imagination and civilization in history books, only because sea and savagery are to us less interesting."

- C.S. Lewis

More food for thought:

“I expect to die in bed, my successor will die in prison and his successor will die a martyr in the public square. His successor will pick up the shards of a ruined society and slowly help rebuild civilization, as the church has done so often in human history.”

Francis Card. George

Fr. Z’s stuff is everywhere

Please follow me on Twitter!

Help support Fr. Z’s Gospel of Life work at no cost to you. Do you need a Real Estate Agent? Calling these people is the FIRST thing you should do!

They find you a pro-life agent in your area who commits to giving a portion of the fee to a pro-life group!

"It will never be known what acts of cowardice have been committed for fear of not looking sufficiently progressive."

Charles Pierre PéguyNotre Patrie, 1905

"If I ought to write the truth, I am of the mind that I ought to flee all meetings of bishops, because I have never seen any happy or satisfactory outcome to any council, nor one that has deterred evils more than it has occasioned their acceptance and growth."

St. Gregory Nazianzus
ep. 131 - AD 382

“We will conquer your Rome, break your crosses, and enslave your women. If we do not reach that time, then our children and grandchildren will reach it, and they will sell your sons as slaves at the slave market.”

To set up a recurring, monthly donation via PAYPAL (even a small one) go to the bottom of this blog and look for the drop down menu! If you prefer, I also have a clearXchange account. Do you want yet another alternative to PayPal? I have set up an account with
CONTINUE TO GIVE
Get a link to donate via CONTINUE TO GIVE using your smart phone.
SEND MESSAGE:
4827563
TO:
715-803-4772
They take a larger percent taste, but they are an alternative.

I remember benefactors in my prayers and periodically say Mass for your intention.

This catechism helped to bring Fr. Z into the Catholic Church!

Be a “Zed-Head”!

Fathers, you don’t know who might show up! It could be a “big fish” of one sort or other…

And... GO TO CONFESSION!

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

What people say…

"Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a traditionalist blogger who has never shied from picking fights with priests, bishops or cardinals when liturgical abuses are concerned."

- Kractivism

"Father John Zuhlsdorf is a crank"
"Father Zuhlsdorf drives me crazy"
"the hate-filled Father John Zuhlsford" [sic]
"Father John Zuhlsdorf, the right wing priest who has a penchant for referring to NCR as the 'fishwrap'"

- Michael Sean Winters

"Fr Z is a true phenomenon of the information age: a power blogger and a priest."

- Anna Arco

“Given that Rorate Coeli and Shea are mad at Fr. Z, I think it proves Fr. Z knows what he is doing and he is right.”

- Comment

"Let me be clear. Fr. Z is a shock jock, mostly. His readership is vast and touchy. They like to be provoked and react with speed and fury."

- Sam Rocha

"Father Z’s Blog is a bright star on a cloudy night."

- Comment

"A cross between Kung Fu Panda and Wolverine."

- Anonymous

Fr. Z is officially a hybrid of Gandalf and Obi-Wan XD

- Comment

Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a scrappy blogger popular with the Catholic right.

Support Military Chaplains!

Click to donate

Food For Thought

“Men are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their disposition to put moral chains upon their own appetites. . . . Society cannot exist unless a controlling power upon will and appetite be placed somewhere; and the less of it there is within, the more there must be without. It is ordained in the eternal constitution of things, that men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters.”

Canadian Amazon Search Box

More stuff…

Archives

ENTRY CALENDAR

Do you use my blog often? Is it helpful to you?

If so, please consider subscribing to send a monthly donation. That way I have steady income I can plan on, and you wind up regularly on my list of benefactors for whom I pray and for whom I periodically say Holy Mass.

Some options

Admin Stuff

The opinions expressed on this blog do not necessarily reflect the positions of any of the Catholic Church's entities with which I am involved. They are my own. Opinions expressed by commentators in the comments belong to the commentators.