This just in: Federal employees really like their retirement and health benefits.

OK, so maybe that is not exactly breaking news. But a recently released survey shows federal workers value nearly all of their benefits. Their satisfaction has dropped off, however.

The Office of Personnel Management first conducted the Federal Employee Benefits Survey in 2004, and has followed up sporadically ever since. The 2013 results show a few offerings have become increasingly unpopular with the federal workforce, while others have become so popular their use is nearly ubiquitous.

Generally speaking, federal employees are really happy with the Thrift Savings Plan. About 94 percent of federal workers -- who, since 2010, have been automatically enrolled in the 401(k)-type program but can opt out -- were TSP participants, the highest participation rate of any benefit program. The next highest enrollment was in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, which maintained an 82 percent participation rate. The Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program fell on the other side of the spectrum, with just 6.7 percent of respondents saying they participate.

OPM asked respondents to comment on the importance of each program, and the scores were up in every category since 2004 except FLTCIP, which was down 11 percent. An additional 16 percent of feds said in 2013 their TSP was important to them, compared to 2004. The importance ratings of FEHBP and workplace health and wellness programs were also up double digits.

OPM noted those programs “have become an extremely important recruitment and retention tool for employers” as a result of the current economic conditions.

The good news for federal employees is the things that are most important to them -- TSP, FEHBP health and wellness programs, as well as the Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance Program -- are increasingly meeting their needs. The bad news: Fewer respondents in 2013 said other benefits were satisfactory compared to 2004.

This chart shows the percentage of federal employees who called each benefit important in 2013, as well as the percentage who said it met their needs:

The largest drop off in satisfaction ratings was for federal employees’ flexible spending account program, which dipped 16 percent since 2011, the last time OPM conducted the survey. Less than one-quarter of feds participated in the program. Nearly one-third of respondents said they felt they did not know enough about FSAs, while another third said they did not enroll because they were prohibited from rolling over remaining funds at the end of each year.

Generally, federal employees felt they received fair to excellent value for the money they spent on benefits. Respondents felt they received the least bang for their buck with dental and vision insurance, with 16 and 12 percent respectively saying the programs offered poor value for the money. Continuing its poor marks across the board, 24 percent fewer respondents felt the FSA program offered a good value compared to 2011.

OPM also asked employees about the federal government’s tobacco cessation benefit, but 90 percent of respondents said they did not know the benefit existed. About 12 percent of respondents said they used tobacco products in the 30-day period before taking the survey, while two-thirds said they had never used tobacco.

Overall, OPM said agencies should use targeted and specific communication efforts to better promote the full array of benefits they offer to employees.

OPM sent the survey to a random sample of nearly 39,000 employees and received a 35 percent response rate.

Eric Katz joined Government Executive in the summer of 2012 after graduating from The George Washington University, where he studied journalism and political science. He has written for his college newspaper and an online political news website and worked in a public affairs office for the Navy’s Military Sealift Command. Most recently, he worked for Financial Times, where he reported on national politics.

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or
otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and
has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems
to be in violation of this rule.

Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.