The big concept in quantum physics is describing things as probabilities. As far as we can tell (which is pretty damn far), this is the way things really work. For any given quantum event there is a finite and non-zero probability of it occurring. This can scale up somewhat.

Take electric repulsion--it is due to the transfer of photons between particles, which has a certain chance of happening. Now imagine that--through an amazing stroke of chance--all of the particles in you and your chair happen to not be exchanging photons for a few moments. With no bonds holding things together, you would desintigtate into a puddle of loose particles.

Of course the odds of such a thing are ridiculously, astronomically, mind-blowingly, incomprehensiblely small. But there is still a chance.

Like I even understand it. Basically just about anything is possible thanks to quantum physics. In the universe we live in, your car might melt, ooze out of your garage, and then re-materialize outside over night. It just probably won't.

The big concept in quantum physics is describing things as probabilities. As far as we can tell (which is pretty damn far), this is the way things really work. For any given quantum event there is a finite and non-zero probability of it occurring. This can scale up somewhat.

Take electric repulsion--it is due to the transfer of photons between particles, which has a certain chance of happening. Now imagine that--through an amazing stroke of chance--all of the particles in you and your chair happen to not be exchanging photons for a few moments. With no bonds holding things together, you would desintigtate into a puddle of loose particles.

Of course the odds of such a thing are ridiculously, astronomically, mind-blowingly, incomprehensiblely small. But there is still a chance.

Like I even understand it. Basically just about anything is possible thanks to quantum physics. In the universe we live in, your car might melt, ooze out of your garage, and then re-materialize outside over night. It just probably won't.

Well actually, this version is more accurate. Height is symbolic of wealth in this image. Liberals believe in taking money from the rich (see: increasing taxes) and giving welfare to the poor. Increased taxes on rich = hacksaw.

If someone posts an image with "regular coke" with a picture of a glass of coke. Then "vanilla coke" with a picture of a man pouring a vial of vanilla into the glass, that's fine. Because that's what vanilla coke tastes like.

If someone alters that image to have the second panel be a man putting vanilla in his mouth then spitting it back into the glass, yeah, it's sort of the same thing, except it's not making any point besides making the concept of vanilla coke look vulgar and offensive in a completely bullshit and petty manner.

If this were an original image it would be fine, but the fact that it's a Photoshop of an existing one makes it a complete load of crap.