Analysis of How Much Michigan Workers Are Losing Under Bill Schuette’s Overtime Pay Cut

While Michigan’s economy is growing, working families across the state are struggling, squeezed between flat paychecks and the rising cost of necessities. One factor dragging down paychecks is the erosion of overtime pay. The salary level below which workers are guaranteed overtime pay when they work more than 40 hours a week has not been updated in years, causing the share of salaried middle-class workers automatically eligible for overtime to plummet from 62 percent in 1975 to less than 7 percent today.[1]

Executive Summary

In 2016, the U.S. Department of Labor ordered a long overdue update to restore overtime pay protections for middle-class workers earning less than about $48,000 a year. However, this overtime pay raise was blocked in Michigan and nationwide as the result of a lawsuit brought by Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette. As a result of the lawsuit, hundreds of thousands of Michiganders lost out on overtime pay rights.

This report provides data for the first time on the local impact on Michigan workers of Schuette’s action blocking this middle-class raise. Starting with state-level data available from the Economic Policy Institute, the report breaks down the impact, county by county.

The key findings include the following:

Statewide, 271,000 Michiganders lost overtime pay protections as a result of Schuette’s lawsuit.

Workers in every county across the state lost overtime protections. The largest impact was in Oakland County, with 36,000 workers losing pay protections.

In other large counties, the impacts included 34,000 workers in Wayne County, 30,000 in Kent County, 19,000 in Macomb County, 10,500 in Genesee County. 9,000 workers in Ottawa County, and 8,000 in Kalamazoo County.

In smaller counties, impacts included 4,000 workers in Grand Traverse County, and 2,000 workers in Marquette County.

As a result, this year and every year Michigan workers are losing $37 million in overtime raises. That’s $37 million in badly needed higher pay that workers across the state are losing ever year because of the lawsuit brought by Schuette to block the overtime raise.

In other states, including California, New York, Washington State, and Pennsylvania, governors and state legislatures are responding to the blocked federal overtime pay expansion by acting under state law to deliver this raise.

Michigan’s governor and legislature should follow those states’ lead and act quickly to deliver this badly needed overtime raise for the state’s workers.

In particular, under Michigan law, the governor, acting through the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, has the power to update overtime pay on his or her own without need for action by the legislature. Governors in Pennsylvania and Washington State are already doing so.

Michigan voters support expanding overtime pay eligibility for the state’s workers by an overwhelming 75 to 18 percent margin, according to a spring 2018 poll by EPIC/MRA.

This report provides background on the overtime pay issue, presents the data on the impact across the state of blocking the overtime pay raise, and explains how Michigan’s governor and legislature can act to finally make these overtime raises happen.

Background on the Lawsuit Blocking the Federal Overtime Pay Restoration

Despite a growing economy and record corporate profits and CEO pay, paychecks for most of the workforce are barely keeping up with the rising cost of living.[2] One of the reasons is eroding pay protections, including those for overtime pay.

It used to be that if you worked more than 40 hours a week, your employer would pay you time-and-a-half for those extra hours. There was an exemption for managers and professional employees, but only for workers who were both highly paid above a salary threshold and had specific management responsibilities or professional roles. Those protections ensured that most workers didn’t have to work excessive hours—and that if they did, they would receive extra pay to make up for it.

Back in 1975, the overtime salary threshold for that exemption was the equivalent of $61,200 a year, and 62 percent of salaried workers in the U.S. were automatically eligible for overtime pay.[3] Today, the level has plummeted to less than 7 percent because the salary threshold has been frozen at just $23,660 since 2004.[4] As a result, many low-paid employees like assistant managers at fast-food restaurants, retail stores, health insurance companies and the like who struggle on salaries of $25,000 to $45,000 a year aren’t eligible for overtime and can be forced to work 50, 60, or even 70 hours a week for no extra pay.

In 2016, the U.S. Department of Labor updated the overtime salary threshold to $47,476 a year—a moderate increase that would not even have fully restored overtime to the 62 percent of salaried workers who used to receive it.[5]

But a group of 21 state attorneys general, including Michigan’s Bill Schuette, sued and blocked this middle-class pay raise for their own constituents.[6]

While legal experts and even the Trump Administration believed the court’s ruling was erroneous and was likely to be reversed on appeal,[7] the administration announced in 2017 that the U.S. Department of Labor would rewrite the blocked overtime rule, most likely rolling back this long overdue pay raise and replacing it with weaker protections for fewer workers.[8] In September 2018, the Trump Labor Department scheduled a series of “listening sessions” as part of this effort to revise the rule and substitute weaker protections for fewer workers.[9]

Despite the rollback of the overtime restoration by Schuette, employer surveys show that 50 percent or more of national companies, including major retailers, restaurant chains, and banks, have already adopted the higher, updated overtime standards and adjusted their pay scales.[10] That shows that restoring overtime pay is economically realistic and would not entail a burdensome transition for businesses.

The Impact of the Blocked Overtime Pay Restoration in Michigan—and the Benefits of Finally Delivering It

In this report we use state-level data available from the Economic Policy Institute, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the U.S. Census Bureau to analyze for each county across Michigan how many workers lost overtime pay as a result of Schuette’s blocking the U.S. Labor Department’s overtime pay restoration—and how many would regain those protections if Michigan’s governor and/or legislature act to deliver this long overdue raise.

As summarized in Table 1, the data show that a total of 271,000 workers across Michigan lost overtime pay as a result of the Schuette lawsuit.

Workers in every county across the state lost overtime protections. The largest impact was in Oakland County, with 36,000 workers losing pay protections. In other large counties, the impacts included 34,000 workers in Wayne County, 30,000 in Kent County, 19,000 in Macomb County, 10,500 in Genesee County. 9,000 workers in Ottawa County and 8,000 in Kalamazoo County. In smaller counties, impacts included 4,000 workers in Grand Traverse County, and 2,000 workers in Marquette County. See Table 1.

A typical worker who lost out on expanded overtime pay was an assistant manager at a big-box retail store or a restaurant chain who earns $25,000 to $45,000 a year. Other affected workers include low-level, low-paid managers at banks, health insurance companies, and a wide range of other types of businesses.

These workers, of which there are many thousands in Michigan, would have had overtime pay restored under the 2016 U.S. Labor Department expansion if Schuette had not blocked it in court.

As Table 2 details, as a result, this year and every year Michigan workers are losing $37 million in overtime raises they would otherwise have received. That’s $37 million in badly needed higher pay that workers across the state are losing ever year because of the lawsuit brought by Schuette to block the overtime raise.

That figure for total lost pay combines projections for two types of lost raises. The first is the total of estimated unpaid overtime hours being worked each year by workers who would have been covered under the updated overtime protections. The second consists of estimated raises for workers whose employers would likely have raised their salaries up to the level of the new overtime threshold in order to keep them exempt from overtime requirements.

Michigan’s Governor and Legislature Should Follow the Lead of Other States and Act Quickly to Deliver the Long Overdue Middle-Class Overtime Raise

In other states, including Pennsylvania, Washington State, California and New York, governors and state legislatures are responding to the blocked federal overtime pay expansion by acting under state law to deliver this raise. For example, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf[11] and Washington State Governor Jay Inslee[12] this year both directed their state labor departments to update their overtime regulations to expand overtime pay—a process that is now underway in both states. California’s overtime salary threshold is already in the process of increasing to $62,400 a year by 2022.[13] And New York’s overtime salary threshold is increasing to $58,500 a year by late 2021 in the suburbs and by late 2018 in New York City, and by a date still to be determined in the reminder of the state.[14]

Michigan Workers Who Lost Stronger Overtime Pay Protections:

270,880

Michigan’s governor and legislature should follow those states’ lead and act quickly to deliver this badly needed overtime raise for the state’s workers. In particular, under Michigan law, the governor, acting through the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, has authority to update the applicable overtime pay rules on his or her own without need for action by the legislature.[15] Michigan’s governor thus has the power to deliver the long overdue overtime raise, as governors are currently doing in Pennsylvania and Washington State.

Alternatively, the Michigan legislature also has the power to expand overtime pay, and legislation to do so has been introduced in past sessions.[16]

Michigan voters support expanding overtime pay eligibility for the state’s workers by an overwhelming 75 to 18 percent margin, according to a spring 2018 poll by EPIC/MRA. Broken out by partisan affiliation, the poll found support for overtime expansion among 85 percent of Democratic voters, 67 percent of Republican voters, and 65 percent of Independents, along with 65 percent of Tea Party members.[17]

Updating Michigan’s overtime rules would finally deliver this long overdue raise for 271,000 or more middle-class workers across the state.

Tables

Table 1. Michigan Workers Statewide and by County Who Lost Stronger Overtime Pay Protections

State/County

Total workers affected

Michigan

270,880

Alcona County

201

Alger County

189

Allegan County

2,841

Alpena County

1,209

Antrim County

663

Arenac County

557

Baraga County

149

Barry County

1,130

Bay County

2,893

Benzie County

534

Berrien County

4,242

Branch County

1,201

Calhoun County

3,374

Cass County

867

Charlevoix County

808

Cheboygan County

899

Chippewa County

1,021

Clare County

680

Clinton County

1,468

Crawford County

332

Delta County

1,387

Dickinson County

1,066

Eaton County

3,076

Emmet County

1,707

Genesee County

10,511

Gladwin County

435

Gogebic County

455

Grand Traverse County

4,301

Gratiot County

1,103

Hillsdale County

1,070

Houghton County

1,099

Huron County

1,103

Ingham County

8,712

Ionia County

2,779

Iosco County

796

Iron County

382

Isabella County

2,651

Jackson County

4,196

Kalamazoo County

7,775

Kalkaska County

232

Kent County

29,790

Keweenaw County

61

Lake County

180

Lapeer County

2,028

Leelanau County

637

Lenawee County

2,299

Livingston County

5,008

Luce County

187

Mackinac County

545

Macomb County

18,842

Manistee County

577

Marquette County

2,306

Mason County

1,053

Mecosta County

1,019

Menominee County

604

Midland County

1,892

Missaukee County

419

Monroe County

2,844

Montcalm County

1,463

Montmorency County

212

Muskegon County

5,616

Newaygo County

1,169

Oakland County

35,714

Oceana County

764

Ogemaw County

779

Ontonagon County

147

Osceola County

509

Oscoda County

226

Otsego County

1,092

Ottawa County

9,327

Presque Isle County

282

Roscommon County

719

Saginaw County

7,070

Sanilac County

1,253

Schoolcraft County

201

Shiawassee County

1,657

St. Clair County

3,700

St. Joseph County

2,362

Tuscola County

1,002

Van Buren County

1,790

Washtenaw County

8,096

Wayne County

33,981

Wexford County

1,361

Source: NELP Action analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), the Economic Policy Institute and the Current Population Survey.

Table 2: Total Overtime Pay Raises Lost Per Year by Michigan Workers

$37,370,076

Source: NELP Action analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), the Economic Policy Institute and the Current Population Survey.

Appendix: About the Data

The analysis in this report was prepared with data available from the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), and draws on state-level analyses by EPI of the impact of the 2016 U.S. Department of Labor overtime raise. Beginning with EPI’s estimates of statewide worker impact and its estimates of overtime pay lost annually, the analysis then used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages and the Current Population Survey to update those estimates to the present, and to estimate county-level impacts.

[15] Mich. Comp. Laws. Ann. § 408.414a(4)(a) exempts “employees who are employed in in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity” from overtime pay and authorizes the director of the Department Licensing and Regulatory Affairs to define those terms by rule. Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 408.414a(5). While the department’s current regulations defining those terms incorporate a very low $250 a week salary threshold, the governor and the director can update the regulations to raise the threshold.

"Among the 11 issues tested, a candidate’s advocacy for raising the minimum wage to $15-per-hour was the most likely to gain the support of the youngest voters, with 68 percent of them saying the issue made them more likely to back a candidate, along with 66 percent who said the same of “Medicare for all.” #RaisetheWage #Fightfor15 ...

Morning Consult polling shows the nation’s youngest, Gen Z voters are less motivated to support a candidate based on the issue of gun control compared to other hot-button topics, which may be better used to get them to show up to the polls this November.