In America in 2013, the law, it seems, is whatever President Obama says it is.

Very difficult to find photos of Caitlin Hayden. Here is Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs Ambassador Richard Boucher and his Senior Advisor Caitlin Hayden pose at the Registan in Uzbekistan.

In fact, The Hill reports that National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden said that the statutes forbidding these exports now no longer apply to “”international organizations … [and] select vetted members of the Syrian opposition, including the Supreme Military Council.”

Very difficult to find photos of Caitlin Hayden. Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs Ambassador Richard Boucher being escorted to the Victoria Memorial in Calcutta, India by Curator Chittaranjan Panda (right) on August 4, 2006. He is accompanied by Consul General Henry V. Jardine (left) and Senior Advisor Caitlin Hayden (seen in the back).

Readers will notice that the Arms Export Control Act does not contain such an exemption.

In fact, the law explicitly purports to prevent the president from making such unilateral decisions, especially as it pertains to chemical weapons and defenses to their use.

Despite breaking the law, flouting the separation of powers, and sending forbidden chemical agent defenses to known agents of [CIA’s] al-Qaeda, the president’s actions will make it very difficult for international regulators “to track and contain those weapons stockpiles.”

This is precisely the point made recently by Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.). Appearing on Fox News Sunday, Paul said that the situation in Syria “is more likely to be unstabler” if the United States continues to intervene in the country’s [CIA’s] civil war.

One Of The Most Active Anti-American Rothschild Goons Inside Congress!

Perhaps the most troubling aspect of the administration’s intent to break the law in order to send chemical agent defenses to our “allies” in Syria (a group whose leadership counts with many members of the same organization that allegedly carried out the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001) is that the shipment will violate another law, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). It is already apparent that for this illegal act the president will, again, not be held accountable.

According to the applicable (until now) provisions of the NDAA, anyone suspected of providing material support to [CIA’s] al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces is subject to indefinite detention in military custody.

On several occasions now, President Obama and hundreds of federal lawmakers have approved shipments of weapons and money to the so-called [CIA] Syrian resistance. The evidence of [CIA’s] al-Qaeda’s presence in this force is overwhelming.

The zeitgeist prevalent since the opening of the Obama epoch of the Pax Americana is to pass laws that do not apply to the lawmakers (ObamaCare and the NDAA) and to flout laws that ostensibly are obstacles to the establishment of an empire.

Unfortunately, President Obama has determined that he “cannot wait” on Congress to act and he will autocratically authorize the export of biological weapons defenses to [CIA’s] Syrian “rebels.”

It’s not as if it isn’t expected, however. As has been known for at least a week now, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has been supplying military weaponry to the [THEIR] anti-Assad forces fighting in Syria.

The agency has also arranged for the [CIA] Syrian opposition to receive anti-tank weaponry like rocket-propelled grenades through a third party, presumably one of the Gulf countries that has been arming the rebels, a senior U.S. intelligence official and two former intelligence officials said Thursday. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the classified program publicly.

Why are para-military organizations teeming with terrorists permitted to own firearms (and to have those weapons paid for and provided by the federal government), but Americans whose very Bill of Rights protects such ownership are having that very right eviscerated day by day by the very same government?

As with so many similar inexplicable inconsistencies, the pResident has no answer.

Perhaps now that the government is about to “run out of money,” President Obama and the CIA can save the American people a little money by combining their illegal shipments of weapons and weapons defenses.

Vel Craft Search +4000 Articles

Constitutional Republic Of The United States

True Federalism.

“The way to have good and safe government is not to trust it all to one, but to divide it among the many, distributing to every one exactly the functions he is competent to.

Let the national government be entrusted with the defense of the nation, and its foreign and federal relations; the State governments with the civil rights, law, police, and administration of what concerns the State generally; the counties with the local concerns of the counties, and each ward direct the interests within itself.

It is by dividing and subdividing these republics from the great national one down through all its subordinations, until it ends in the administration of every man’s farm by himself; by placing under every one what his own eye may superintend, that all will be done for the best.

What has destroyed liberty and the rights of man in every government which has ever existed under the sun? The generalizing and concentrating all cares and powers into one body.”

– Thomas Jefferson

Unconstitutional Powers By Repetition

Usurpations by one branch of government, of powers entrusted to a coequal branch, are not rendered constitutional by repetition.

The United States Supreme Court held unconstitutional hundreds of laws enacted by Congress over the course of five decades that included a legislative veto of executive actions in INS v. Chada, 462 U.S. 919 (1982).