It is widely accepted that the Nazis, in Operation Himmler, faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland

It has now been persuasively argued — as shown, for example, in this History Channel video — that Nazis set fire to their own government building and blamed that fire on others (if you have trouble playing the clip, it is because the website hosting the clip requires you to download the clip before playing it). The fire was the event which justified Hitler's seizure of power and suspension of liberties

Recently declassified documents show that in the 1960's, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. If you view no other links in this article, please read the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC's World News Tonight with Peter Jennings

Famous leaders have stated again and again that false flag terror is the name of the game:

U.S. President James Madison said: "If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy."

Adolph Hitler said: "Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death".

Nazi leader Hermann Goering said:

"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country".

Josef Stalin said:

"The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened"

Given the above-described history offalse flag terror, it is beyond dispute that we must carefully scrutinize what really happened on 9/11, and that we cannot take the government's word for it.

8 Comments:

"If we don't learn our history, we're doomed to repeat it" is, paradoxically, a true and false statement. It's true because if "we the people" do not know history, we get the same trick pulled on us again and again and again. It's false because it can imply that our "leaders" do not know history and keep making the same "mistakes". In fact, they know history all too well and the reason the same sorts of things, like False Flag operations, keep happening again and again and again is because they know that it works. Let's stop this vicious, evil cycle right now. Let's make 9/11 the LAST False Flag operation in U.S. History.

"what is history but both parties agreeing to the same story"Napoleon said that and after the 2nd term win a unnamed bush aide said "were an empire now we create our own reality"i am often asked were is the evidence!its right there in the open, bright and shining! but people dont want to look,so we will repeat history until they start looking.

"If you don't eat yer meat, you can't have any pudding. How can youhave any pudding if you don't eat yer meat?" - Another brick in the Wall

The problem is, we have been having nothing but pudding (fluff) while assiduously avoiding 'eating our meat' (history). We know our historical myths quite well (Geo. Washington chopping down the cherry tree, et sim) but are woefully ignorant of real history. We are not unlike a person suddenly waking up in an unfamiliar mall, looking at the mall map and simply seeing a star and the notation 'You are here' on a blank piece of paper. If you don't know how you got there (the rest of the map), the 'You are here' notation is of no use. You must know where you have been to know where you are.

On the first day of Operation Cast Lead, the air force bombed the graduation ceremony of a police course, killing dozens of policemen. Months earlier, an operational and legal controversy was already swirling around the planned attack. According to a military source who was involved in the planning, bombing the site of the ceremony was authorized with no difficulty, but questions were raised about the intent to strike at the graduates of the course. Military Intelligence, convinced the attack was justified, pressed for its implementation. Representatives of the international law division (ILD) in the Military Advocate General's Office at first objected, fearing a possible violation of international law.

Did the attacks of September 11 influence your legal situation?

"Absolutely. When we started to define the confrontation with the Palestinians as an armed confrontation, it was a dramatic switch, and we started to defend that position before the Supreme Court. In April 2001 I met the American envoy George Mitchell and explained that above a certain level, fighting terrorism is armed combat and not law enforcement. His committee [which examined the circumstances of the confrontation in the territories] rejected that approach. Its report called on the Israeli government to abandon the armed confrontation definition and revert to the concept of law enforcement. It took four months and four planes to change the opinion of the United States, and had it not been for those four planes I am not sure we would have been able to develop the thesis of the war against terrorism on the present scale."

Quotes are from:Colonel (res.) Daniel Reisner, who headed ILD (International Law Division in the Military Advocate General's Office)

My comments: What will Israel do about the current turn in world opinion following their racists and genocidal actions in Gaza? They will to do something to prevent loosing the support of the US and the EU. They have the means, the motive, the opportunity and the immediate need to commit another 911. Are they sufficiently moral to resist the temptation? I think not! They must be watched very carefully.

We know that the three enormous WTC buildings could not have been collapsed just as in a controlled demolition by two airplane strikes. We know that the wigely scattered wreckage in PA could not have resulted from a plane crashing into the ground. We know that the purported plane hitting the pentagon could not have disappeared into a sixteen foot wide tear in the building. For these and many many other reasons, we know that we know that the "official" story of 9/11 is preposterous, and yet we try to live as if the social contract implied by our constitution still binds us together.We know that traitors are controlling large segments of the government and that as times get harder the vise will tighten. Though we are pretty sure who some of them are we do not know exactly who did what or what if anything we can do about it. The ring of power bestows invisibility on its owner, the source of great evil.