The following Brief was filed in the U.S. Supreme Court on
February 24, 2012, and entered upon the Docket March 1, 2012.

Pursuant to Rule 15.3, the Court has given opposing counsel until
Monday, April 02, 2012, ten days from today, to oppose this Brief.

Please note that this matter is one of out and out fraud from its
inception, wherein there was no Notice whatsoever to appear for an
arraignment, Plaintiff was not present, did he have any knowledge
of such proceeding, and when inquired of the court reporter named
in the 11/24/09 Minute Order for a transcript of this proceeding,
was informed that no such proceeding took place.

Upon being so informed by the court reporter, he asked her if she
would prepare and sign a Declaration establishing that there was
no such arraignment or criminal charges brought forth. She so did,
and the declaration from this court reporter has been constantly
set forth showing the fraud of this such so-called "conviction."

The implication of this matter is that unless the U.S.Supreme
Court reverses, the government can now, through its courts
universally applied, see through a "conviction" of anyone they
wish of any criminal charge without notice, knowledge, presence,
or criminal charges, and can see that that one be imprisoned on
these supposed "charges," and there is nothing anyone can do about
it. This is true even if the person acquires the declaration of an
official court reporter name it the record that no such event
transpired. This is the issue now pending before the U.S. Supreme
Court, which decision will finalize this question whether such
fraudulent action is lawful within these United States.

For those with legal interests, you will find herein a plethora of
legal authority referencing the effects of fraud on the courts of
America. The question is, can we rely upon these authorities. We
shall now see if fraud is now the way of life to be expected in
our judicial system of America.