REMAINERS, “LIBERALS” AND BIG BUSINESS BETRAY THEIR FASCISM – Part II

This is the concluding Part II of an article which first appeared on Free Nations, and has been republished with kind permission of the author. Part I was published here yesterday and concluded with the following paragraph:

The major shareholders in BMW today are therefore Goebbels’ step grandchildren and the direct descendant of Magda Goebbels, a Nazi so fanatical that she killed her own children by Goebbels (in Hitler’s Bunker) rather than let them grow up in a non Nazi Germany.

Anyone who owns or is thing ink of buying a BMW or indeed and German or EU car should write to those companies warning that any failure to secure a Free Trade deal post Brexit will mean “no more German/French cars for me”!

AIRBUS – LIB DEM EUROFANATICS

The other prominent British company warning of a failure to kowtow to the EU establishment is AIRBUS – a major recipient of EU subsidies. In turns out that their Director of Communications Katherine Bennett is a leading Liberal Democrat pro EU activist who worked for a Liberal Democrat Peer and has spoken at Remainer public meetings.

I hope I need hardly remind readers that one of the prominent collaborators with Nazism in the 1930s was the Liberal Lord Lothian and that the former Liberal Prime Minister Lloyd George was a great admirer of Hitler – “Hitler is the greatest living German and it is a pity there are not more like him in England”

REMAINERS WARNINGS PROVE THEIR FASCISM

The Remainers are investing much time and money in warning about the disastrous consequences of Britain restoring its right to self government and its right to trade freely in the world with the other 160 independent countries!

They go further and collaborate with EU negotiators in seeking to make the terms of Brexit so punishing that we decide not to leave after all.

But if life after the EU will be so disastrous because the EU will seek to punish us then what have they been doing to us for the last 46 years while we were their powerless “partners”? If the EU control over us is so complete that we will be powerless without them then the Remainers were lying to the British people about our not having lost any democratic, sovereign or economic rights by being a member!

It will be a difficult transition to freedom – it always is when leaving prison! We need to re-establish our democratic, social, trade and cultural connections with those friends whom we abandoned in 1973. But compared to remaining in this rotten-to-the-core, fascist, decrepit and declining EU (so decadent that it cannot prevent a massive invasion of migrants), with its Commissars so intent on damaging our interests the future can only be brighter – and, far more important, more free and democratic.

POLITICAL POWER THROUGH BUSINESS FASCISM

One thing we must never forget about the EU. One of its greatest modern constructors was Helmut Kohl and he said that

“British business would never allow the UK to leave the EU”

He thus condemned democratic self government of a nation state to be the prerogative not of its people but of big business – precisely the definition of corporatist fascism which saw the CBI, big US corporations (especially FORD whose scion Henry was given the Nazis’ highest honour) and German firms like BMW, Siemens, Thyssen, Krupp, IG Farben etc form the collaborators of the 1930s.

We are in the middle of a war, dressed up as matters of trade, customs and tariffs. Appeasers are as dangerous today as they were in the 1930s. And we see from their corporate identities , personalities and tactics how similar they are.

Compromising our democratic self government and ability to trade in the world so that foreign owned car companies can import 60% of their content and take out 100% of their profit is not what the British nation will tolerate. Only 12% of British business trades with the EU and a lot of that is by foreign owned companies. By far the most critical point for them is the exchange rate. In the event of a no deal Brexit the resulting tariffs would be far less important – but not to German and French and other EU corporations trying to sell into the UK from outside who would be hit by their high currency and the WTO tariffs and loss of market share.

Theresa May, Greg Clark and Philip Hammond are obsessed with the effects on British business but fail utterly to grasp the suicidal results for EU business without free trade access to their biggest market.

About The Author

RA is the author of 7 books on political economy and the EU, an occasional adviser to Minsters and MPs since 1981, the founder of the Freenations website which is read in over 100 countries and a previous parliamentary candidate for the Referendum Party and UKIP. In 2000 he came within a few votes of winning the UKIP leadership election.

Related Posts

17 Comments

Jake Bennett
on July 8, 2018 at 9:43 am

Mr Atkinson presents us with powerful argument exposing the enormity of the leverage corporations have over governments to the detriment of representative democracy.
The EU: A Corporatist Racket: How the European Union Was Created by Global Corporatism David Barnaby.

Mention is made in one of the comments below of Germany in effect tossing the French aside like a damp rag as far is business is concerned. I wouldnt disagree I believe the Common Market was the device to allow France to have a share in the creation and establishment of the EU EMPIRE which as the article explains is based on business.

However it has always been a Faustian pact, because in effect France would be the EU "sole holder" of a permanent seat on the Security Council. De Gaul recognised this and would not allow Britain the other European holder of the seat to join.
In effect although France/ Germany were an equal axis Germany would always have "control" of foreign policy as the Common Market developed into the EU.
Our entry into the Common Market destroyed this Bi-axis and resulted in a tri-axis, meaning the dilution of French influence.

With our TOTAL exit on Brexit the France/Germany Faustian pact will be reinstated;, the establishment of the United States of Europe will gallop forward apace but Foreign policy and influence will be completely in the control of those two nations in effect the other 25 will become even more subservient and subjugated minor partners.

Oh but I forgot theyve abandoned plans for full unity!!!!
Ha -bl**dy Ha; pull the other one.

It’s a bit desperate to have a dig at Lord Lothian and David Lloyd George for their admiration of Hitler. After all, the fact is that he and his government performed a miracle that turned Germany from a basket case to super power in a mere few years giving its people the highest mean standard of living throughout all of Europe and leading the way on labour laws that are now standard. We are constantly being fed a false historical narrative.

Look up the work of Prof. Antony C. Sutton (such as an interview titled ‘The Best Enemies Money Can Buy’) and – surprise, surprise – the miracle of Nazi German wasn’t so much about a ‘Triumph of The Will’, Wagner and prancing around at Nurnberg (I recall reading that the NAZI system incorporated much redundancy) but external help and political and mental II6mmanipulation (questions were asked in Congress as to why so much desperately needed investment was going to the Reich, for no economic gain), indeed I believe that the Gov. of the BOE was a buddy of Reich Finance Minister Schacht and that the BIS bank came into being to aid the financing of the build up to war.

Similarly with Bolshevism (which Antony Sutton researched in depth); history is not as we are taught but better explained by understanding the (diabolical) Hegelian dialectical process.

Freddy – yes and a very big can of worms this is too, particularly if you were to trace some of the people that benefited from this slave labour.

Vera
on July 6, 2018 at 11:55 am

But Germany’s success was at the expense of the other EU countries, which was what they always intended. A new German Empire, or EUSSR run by Germany. France as usual believes itself to be a partner in this new Empire but is actually just a useful idiot to Germany and will be tossed aside when they are no long of use.

The economic model on which pre-war Nazi Germany was built was increasingly unsustainable in peace-time and by 1940 or very soon after would have had to rely on aggressive war-waging in order to continue.

Hjalmar Schacht, Alfred Rosenberg & other intelligent Nazi financiers and theorists knew this; Churchill worked it out and was derided as a xenophobic (yesterday’s “racist”) warmonger for wanting to carry out prophylactic action (which may have included the assassination of Hitler and, by 1939, Heydrich, who would have made an even more dangerous foe).

Yes, this is the same JLR that recently announced that production of the Discovery will move from Solihull to Slovakia. Because, you know, staying in the EU and the single market protects British jobs, right? 😉

In a real world we would apply punitive import duties specifically to the products of such companies where production has been moved overseas. Hit them where it hurts. Hopefully we will be free to do that soon but I wonder how many MPs and government ministers have a financial interest in JLR?

If I were considering buying a Discovery then I’d buy a Jeep instead now.

Jack T, Jeeps are owned by Chrysler Fiat, which is reported itself to be facing a take over bid from Hyundai. I agree the statement from JLR is likely to upset a lot of U.K buyers. In the global scale of things JLR continue to be quite small.