For anyone who enjoys Nick Drake, Jeff Buckley and any other later singers who sound like truly mellow, lyrical orgasms, please find a copy of Jimmie Spheeris' "Isle of View." Another tragic early death. This album would definitely be in my Top 10 for its shelf life and influence. Less political than Shawn Phillips (why isn't "Furthermore" on this list, by the way?), but just as important, as evidenced by Sony's eventual realization that Jimmie's fans were correct in insisting that his LPs be released on CD.

We all know rolling stones overrates old albums. We all know newer albums such as radiohead's In Rainbows, Kid A, and Ok Computer should all be in the top 100 (I am saying OK Computer and Kid A are top 50), and Arcade Fire albums should all be higher than where they are.

What's wrong with ''old'' albums eh? For your information, Rolling Stone can ''overrate'' ''old'' albums all they want because those ''old'' albums are great music, something that you seem to not understand. And by the way, those albums you just mentioned are ''old'' as well so you're overrating older albums too, get the picture?

There is nothing wrong with old albums. It is just that there are indeed albums made in the past 25 years that can be seen as being among the top 10 of all time. Instead Rolling Stone puts 4 beatles albums in the top 10, which makes zero sense. They show a huge bias towards albums of the 60s and 70s instead of looking at albums fairly from all perspectives.

The 1960s were basically the turning point for music to come, those 4 Beatles are like the greatest albums of all-time with great songs and innovating achievements, that's why they're in the top 10, and Rolling Stone aren't biased towards the 60s and 70s, it's just that the music from the 1960s and 70s are just that great (so is 80s and 90s). Also, they're also biased towards Kanye, Jay-Z, Muddy Waters, Eminem aren't they? You can see throughout the list.

I don't get the obsession with the Beatles..WORST band of all time..boring repetitive little kid songs untalented musicians and singers and the production was pathetic.Look at ANY other band or artist from the same era..all much better then the Beatles.All they had is the support of little girls and money hungry music industry big-shots.

Okay, your comment is like one of the most fucking stupidest comments ever written, you sound like a fucking moron especially the last part, you must not know music at all of you're just that fucking stupid..... it's probably both.