Friday, December 14, 2012

Lawful Florida Gun Owner Shot by Police (Warning Penis Joke Involved)

An early morning argument between a Palm Beach Shores man and a woman next door over the small size of his manhood sparked a police shooting that left the man wounded and facing years in prison, Gossip Extra has learned.

Police sources tell me Adam Brown, 45, was swimming
naked in the pool of the El Coqui apartment complex about 2:30 a.m.
yesterday when a female neighbor started trash-talking about his penis.

“She said something about it being really small,” said one
investigator at the scene who asked not to be named. “So, he just got
out of the pool, still naked, walked into his apartment and came out
with a rifle.”

Brown allegedly knocked on the door of the woman, identified as Jenny Arroway, after
she retreated inside. When she opened, the source said he pointed the
rifle at her face, then ”he told her: ‘How do you like the size of
this?’”

For me, the emphasis on this story is not the guy's dick size, but the fact that he was another lawful gun owner who resorted to bullying behavior with a gun when pressured. I suppose the iceberg-theory which they apply to DGUs applies here as well. 95% of these incidents do not get reported. The ones that make the news are a tiny fraction of what's actually happening.

13 comments:

I wonder if the "gun rights" movement itself is simply a method of compensation? They fear disarmament, as it would deprive them of their mean of compensation. They oppose gun control laws as they would feel inadequate, castrated, and incomplete without the presence of a firearm.

If one substitutes genitalia with arms, then if someone where to control an army, does that imply that they are more "masculine" than you? After all, if a rifle is compensation for penile mass, how much compensation is a MiG 21 worth?

So, what? You're tellin' me that you never went swimmin' nekkid in a community pool and had your junk shrivel up cuz' the water was like, "brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!"? Then, there you are, just mindin' your own business (well, maybe breakin' a stoopit law about public nudity, but it's a BAD law) and, THEN, this slut starts taunting you.

That gal shoulda offered to help him; stead, what's she do--she makes fun of his manhood, that's what! Hey, I'da had a little "talk" with her, too. Serves her right for shootin' off her mouth and makin' fun of that poor guy who was just pleasurin himself, I mean, havin' a good time in that pool.

Damned good thing he wasn't barbecuin' nekkid, she'da prolly started in on him about how to cook a porkchop!

I don't care if you're rude. I don't care whether you are rational. I think it's fine to make fun of gunzloonz. You should however, find a handle and use it, so that we know whether we have one of you or a whole mess of sockpuppets from somebody. Just a thought.

Ninety-five percent of incidents in which a thug threatens a good citizen with a gun go unreported? Because that's what we have here. The man was already committing one crime, and he added some more to the first.

You call him a lawful gun owners, but you have no evidence of that. Unlike your claims about gun accidents, there's proof that people who act like this often have done other bad things in the past.

But let's imagine that he's never committed a crime before this night. How would you identify him as someone who would do this at some point in the future? Given the number of gun owners in this country and the number of first-time buyers lately, how are you going to supply enough shrinks to test all of them?

But why do you feel the need to add useless adjectives all over the place? As you say, all are lawful until they commit a crime. Why don't you include "human" and "American" and "breathing" to the description?

You keep saying that you don't want to take away all guns, but you make snide remarks about lots of gun owners, and you lay out implications in your "lawful gun owner" titles that tell us that you don't trust any gun owner. Your proposals and attitudes add up to one thing: You want to ban private ownership of guns. You may not want to admit it, but the total effect of everything you ask for would be to make owning guns legally all but impossible. That's a de facto ban.

The reason the gun fanatics so often bring up the penis jokes is a good bit of diversion in and of itself. They don't want anyone to think beyond the jokes and realize it's all a metaphor for mental inadequacy. It's not that they're lacking physically, they're lacking psychologically. Otherwise they wouldn't own and carry guns - for the most part, there are exceptions.

"But why do you feel the need to add useless adjectives all over the place? As you say, all are lawful until they commit a crime. Why don't you include "human" and "American" and "breathing" to the description?"

I don't know about mikeb302000 but I'm pretty sure that being ""human" and "American" and "breathing"" are all factors that we have no control over, unless we decide to kill ourselves at which point we will become spoiling meat. Hazzing teh gunz, otoh, is pretty much voluntary, nobody forces them on you unless you join the military or some similar organization.

Yeah, us nongunzloonz fetishize all sorta stuff. I mean, I'll just bet that there's a website out there with thousands of pix of guys' lawnmowers or laptops, complete with a full range of accessories and information on how to soup them up and make them go faster and, like, other stuff, yeah, that's the ticket. NOT.

You don't spend much time on the Internet, I take it. There are groups to discuss all kinds of interests. I've seen lots of boards talking about all manner of computer topics. I've even seen websites devoted to tractors. Cars? Hooboy, what a long list there.