Former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould shook the Canadian political landscape with a thorough telling of months of “inappropriate” pressure that she says she was subjected to by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and others within the senior ranks of the government.

Here’s a shortened version of the timeline that Wilson-Raybould described in a near 35-minute telling of the four-month long “concerted and sustained effort” by Trudeau and others to “politically interfere” in her role as attorney general, as she told the justice committee on Wednesday.

Wilson-Raybould described events between September and December 2018 as involving 11 people aside from herself and her staff. Other top officials were from the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), the Privy Council Office (PCO) and the finance minister’s office.

Sept. 4, 2018: Wilson-Raybould and her chief of staff, Jessica Prince, were overseas when she was sent a memorandum prepared by the Director of Public Prosecutions, Kathleen Roussel, which was entitled, “Whether to issue and invitation to negotiate a remediation agreement to SNC-Lavalin.” Roussel advised that a remediation agreement is not appropriate in SNC-Lavalin’s case. Wilson-Raybould and her office began studying the case.

Sept. 6: Ben Chin, Finance Minister Bill Morneau’s chief of staff, contacted Prince. This was one of the first times Wilson-Raybould heard from someone outside of the Department of Justice about a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA). Chin told Prince that “if (SNC-Lavalin) don’t get a DPA, they will leave Montreal, and it’s the Quebec election right now, so we can’t have that happen.”

Around this time, Prince exchanged emails with Wilson-Raybould’s minister’s office staff, who advised her that Nathalie Drouin, the deputy attorney general, was working on something about the issue, while Wilson-Raybould’s staff were drafting a memo about the attorney general’s role and how it relates to the Public Prosecutions Service of Canada (PPSC).

Also near this date, Wilson-Raybould asked to meet with Trudeau on another urgent topic as soon as she returned to Canada. This would become the Sept. 17 meeting.

Sept. 7: Prince spoke to Drouin about her call with Chin, which Drouin said the Justice Department was working on. Drouin explained some potential options to Prince, including that they call Roussel to discuss her decision not to offer SNC-Lavalin a DPA or that they arrange an external review of the decision.

Wilson-Raybould also received a note from her staff about the attorney general’s role, which was also sent to Elder Marques and Amy Archer, who are advisers in the PMO.

Sept. 8: Drouin shared a draft note about the attorney general’s role, which contained options to proceed in the case of SNC-Lavalin, with Prince, who also shared it with Wilson-Raybould. Wilson-Raybould’s staff asked Drouin for more details about one of the options in the note.

Sept. 11: Chin told a staff member of Wilson-Raybould’s that the PPSC told SNC-Lavalin it cannot enter a DPA. Chin said that SNC-Lavalin’s legal counsel felt as though terms for an agreement could be negotiated.

Sept. 16: Wilson-Raybould had not been contacted directly by Trudeau, officials in the PMO or the PCO about SNC-Lavalin and a potential DPA prior to this date.

Prince is called by Trudeau’s advisers Mathieu Bouchard and Marques to discuss the company. They tell Prince that the Crown prosecutor of SNC-Lavalin’s case wants to negotiate an agreement, but Roussel doesn’t. Bouchard and Marques say to Prince that they “understand that there are limits on what can be done, and that they can’t direct, but that they hear that our (deputy justice minister) thinks we can get the PPSC” to ask for outside legal advice. They also brought up an upcoming SNC-Lavalin board meeting and the context of the provincial election in Quebec. Prince was asked if someone had suggested outside advice to the PPSC and whether she was open to it. Prince responded by stressing the independence of the office, to which Bouchard and Marques said that they didn’t want to cross any lines but that they wanted her to follow up with Wilson-Raybould directly.

Sept. 17: Wilson-Raybould met with Trudeau and the Privy Council Clerk, Michael Wernick. The meeting wasn’t called to discuss SNC-Lavalin but Trudeau raised the issue of the company right away. He asked Wilson-Raybould “to help out” and said that if a DPA wasn’t reached that the company would leave Montreal and that many jobs would be lost. Wilson-Raybould explained the law and said she had made up her mind about her decision that she was not going to interfere with Roussel’s choice, as it wouldn’t be appropriate in the case of SNC-Lavalin. Wernick also pitched a DPA, citing the potential move and the Quebec election. Trudeau mentioned the election too and that he was a Quebec MP. To this, Wilson-Raybould said she asked Trudeau, “Are you politically interfering with my role, my decision as the attorney general? I would strongly advise against it.” Trudeau rejected the notion of interference, stressing instead the need to find a solution.

At the request of the prime minister and the Privy Council clerk, Wilson-Raybould agreed to speak to Wernick and Drouin further about the matter, but asserted that she would not change her mind.

On the same day, Drouin also said that Finance officials told her they wanted to make sure she knew there would be an impact if nothing was done about SNC-Lavalin.

Sept. 19: Wilson-Raybould met with Wernick. He brought up job losses and said that the decision is not about the Quebec election or Trudeau being a Montreal MP. Wilson-Raybould agreed to accept a letter from SNC-Lavalin about their concerns and forward it to Roussel, who Wilson-Raybould maintained that she would not overrule.

Prince spoke with Marques and Bouchard. They wanted an update about a DPA. Prince gave them a summary of Wilson-Raybould’s meeting with Trudeau and Wernick, from the day before. Marques and Bouchard suggested to Prince that Wilson-Raybould informally reach out to Roussel, which the then-attorney general wasn’t comfortable with, since she thought it would constitute political interference. The PMO staff asked Prince if the same would be said if Wilson-Raybould’s staff reached out to Roussel rather than the attorney general directly, which Prince said it would be.

Wilson-Raybould spoke to Morneau about SNC-Lavalin in the House of Commons. He stressed the need to save jobs, while she told him that his office’s communications with her’s about the issue was inappropriate and had to stop.

Sept. 20: Wilson-Raybould spoke with Chin and Justin To, Morneau’s deputy chief of staff, over the phone. SNC-Lavalin and DPAs were discussed in both calls.

Oct. 18: Bouchard called Prince to ask that Wilson-Raybould look at the option of seeking an outside legal opinion about Roussel’s choice not to offer SNC-Lavalin the opportunity to negotiate a DPA.

Oct. 19: SNC-Lavalin filed an application in Federal Court to void Roussel’s decision to not enter a DPA. “In my view, this necessarily put to rest any notion that I might speak to or intervene with the (Director of Public Prosecutions), or that an external review could take place,” Wilson-Raybould said.

Oct. 26: Bouchard told Prince that he was still interested in seeking an external legal opinion. Prince said this would “obviously” be perceived as interference. Mathieu said that it would be bad if SNC-Lavalin announced they were leaving Canada six months away from the election. He wanted to make sure “all options” had been covered.

Nov. 22: Wilson-Raybould met with Bouchard and Marques to discuss a DPA for SNC-Lavalin. Bouchard tried to tell her that they needed to find a solution. She told them they would be interfering in prosecutorial independence.

Dec. 5: Wilson-Raybould met with Gerald Butts. “I wanted to speak about a number of things, including bringing up (SNC-Lavalin) and the barrage of people hounding me and my staff,” Wilson-Raybould said. She told Butts that everyone needed to stop talking to her about SNC-Lavalin. Butts told her they needed a solution to the issue. She said she had told Wernick that SNC-Lavalin could have written to her about their concerns, but that the company hadn’t

Dec. 7: Wilson-Raybould received a letter from Trudeau with a letter attached from the chief executive officer of SNC-Lavalin, dated Oct. 15. She responded to Trudeau’s letter saying that the decision of a DPA was Roussel’s to make, independent of her office.

Dec. 18: Prince was called to meet with Butts and Katie Telford to discuss SNC-Lavalin. They asked Prince how far along Wilson-Raybould was in terms of finding a solution. “They told her that they felt like the issue was getting worse and that I was not doing anything,” Wilson-Raybould said. Prince said that Butts told her there wasn’t a solution “that doesn’t involve some interference.” Telford said to Prince, which she relayed to Wilson-Raybould by text message, that “if Jody is nervous, we would of course line up all kinds of people to write OpEds saying that what she is doing is proper.”

Dec. 19: Wilson-Raybould spoke to Wernick over the phone about the SNC-Lavalin issue. “I think he is going to find a way to get it done one way or another,” Wernick told Wilson-Raybould. She affirmed her position on the matter and told Wernick she could not act in a partisan or politically-motivated way, all which his suggestions had “screams of that.” She said she told Wernick she was having thoughts of the Saturday Night Massacre and that she was confident she had given Trudeau her best advice to protect him and prosecutorial independence.

Jan. 7: Trudeau called Wilson-Raybould to tell her she was being shuffled from her role as attorney general and minister of justice. She told him she felt it was because of the SNC-Lavalin issue, which Trudeau denied.

Jan. 11: Drouin is told of the shuffle by Wernick, who also says that one of the first conversations that will be had with the new minister will be about SNC-Lavalin.

“In my view, the communications and efforts to change my mind on this matter should have stopped. Various officials also urged me to take partisan political considerations into account, which it was clearly improper for me to do,” Wilson-Raybould said during her testimony.

Conservative Party Leader Andrew Scheer said Wilson-Raybould’s testimony proves that Trudeau no longer has the “moral authority” to remain prime minister, that he should resign and that there should be an RCMP investigation started to look into the matter. Trudeau said Thursday that none of the 11 officials who Wilson-Raybould named at committee had been contacted by the RCMP. The RCMP had nothing to add about a potential investigation either.

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says the former attorney general’s testimony shows the need for a public inquiry into the affair and that after that the prime minister “may” need to resign.

Trudeau rejected the notion that he resign when speaking at an event to supporters on Wednesday, saying he “completely (disagreed) with the former attorney general’s characterization of events.”

On Thursday, after having watched Wilson-Raybould’s entire testimony, Trudeau said he is still deliberating about her future in the Liberal caucus.