How did you determine that? were you standing outside Nature, or inside nature when your fantasy came upon you? Toss the book of langauge/math into the remixer and one has to ask, how did that crawl ashore, turn and begin speaking virtualized by it's own words. The psyche IS the word, it is never individuated FROM the word regardless.

The gate creaked shut and Rowley came through it, “the most venerable of the labourers on the farm—a tall, solid man, still unbent, with grey side-whiskers and a steep, dignified profile. Grave, weighty in manner, splendidly respectable, Rowley had the air of a great English statesman of the mid-nineteenth century. He halted on the outskirts of the group, and for a moment they all looked at the pigs in a silence that was only broken by the sound of grunting or the squelch of a sharp hoof in the mire. Rowley turned at last, slowly and ponderously and nobly, as he did everything, and addressed himself to Henry Wimbush.”

“‘Look at them, sir’, he said, with a motion of his hand towards the wallowing swine. ‘Rightly is they called pigs.’”

Written in orange is the expression replacing the word "heterological" (I still haven't been able to find out what is the name of such an expression), in green is the semantic content of the predicate "is heterological". The next step would be to replace the second occurrence of "the property it denotes", in green, with the property it actually denotes, which yields:
May be this link can guide ushttp://on-self-reference.blogspot.com/2011/06/ii-grellings-paradox.html

Written in orange is the expression replacing the word "heterological" (I still haven't been able to find out what is the name of such an expression), in green is the semantic content of the predicate "is heterological". The next step would be to replace the second occurrence of "the property it denotes", in green, with the property it actually denotes, which yields:
May be this link can guide ushttp://on-self-reference.blogspot.com/2011/06/ii-grellings-paradox.html

Don't confuse autologicality, a philosophical concept dealing solely with reference and meaning (and, as E.G. points out, not a binary concept, since many words do not "refer" at all) with sound symbolism (a lexical feature of most languages that produces words like Chinook Jargon [ʔoʔ] 'to vomit' and [px] 'to spit').

There are lots of kinds of sound symbolism; some are obvious like the Chinook Jargon verbs, but some are just a matter of words of a feather flocking together, like the English KL-initial words at http://www.umich.edu/~jlawler/kl-chart.pdf.

I think it might be harder to recognize this phenomenon in one's own native language, but when learning a new one, certain words seem to be particularly apt. When I heard the Russian word for stupid, pronounced "gloopy," I wanted to adopt it into English. It certainly sounds like what it is.