The Stark Raving Viking

Sunday, June 30, 2013

Tax Dollars spent to protect criminal bankers, not us

Our US tax dollars are used by international bankers and corporate organized crime for their protection and business interests, not ours. Citizens in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Vietnam, Puerto Rico, Hawaii, Philippines, Guam, Africa, South America, are not better off because of 1000's of military bases occupation, war, spying, and covert actions. How are the US National Guard and US Military protecting our US Constitutional rights, liberty, and freedom if their international bankster leaders are poisoning them to take everything from us, we the people?

So, who is really in charge? Why are we paying for our own abuse?

The NSA Edward Snowden spying and leak scandal should wake some of you up. How much of our money are we paying to spy on ourselves and who really benefits? Are we paying $20 a day, $100 a day, each? Isn't that theft, fraud, racketeering, and misappropriation of funds? Aren't elected officials complicit in the biggest rip off in the history of the world?

It is nothing new.

J. Edgar Hoover, the former director of the FBI had more power than any US President. He wasn't elected. He illegally spied on anyone he wanted for personal gain and power. Hoover allegedly was a cross-dressing homosexual at a time when that was career suicide. Hoover read movie scripts, decided what movies were allowed to be made in Hollywood. Hoover decided to ruin some actors and promote others.

The FBI was poised to ruin leaders such as Martin Luther King and others. They tried to break up families, caused job loss, used outside contractors and informants to frame citizens, terrorize the public, beat people up, and even murder citizens on the FBI secret target list. What happened with Whitey Bulger in Boston. Weren't the Massachusetts State Police, the FBI, and organized crime all one and the same?

Didn't the FBI use tax dollars to have a white supremacist radio host inflame the public? [Hal Turner] was paid by the FBI to cause civil unrest, murder, mayhem, and racial division. So, can planning the Boston Bombing and having contractors carry it out be put past the FBI?

The Boston Bombing telethon, "Boston Strong" was turning my stomach. What a bunch of BS propaganda.

Domestic spying does not further freedom, liberty, and the US Constitution. It does not make the economy better. It does not improve our lives. Should the self-employed be targeted as terrorists? We are the enemy of international corporate aggression. Steven G. Erickson video [click here]. And, more videos [click here].

AMERICAN MASTERS: Trumbo | Closing Arguments (Ensemble) ...

Text with video:

America Exposed by US Rep Mike Gravel

Homeland Security equals armed occupation. The TSA is tyranny. Corporations own America.
Corporations need to be regulated, not in charge. Are the corporations
who run the US aligned with Israel out to bomb Iran? Mike Gravel is an
insider with the answers. Gravel isn't going along with those who have
sold their souls to the international organized criminals, banks and
corporate owners.

Why are American taxpayers paying for so many wars? Why have so many
citizens died in the wars in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya etc for
no good reason? Why do most Americans do nothing when citizens are targets for being outspoken?

James Corbett of the Corbett Report talks about the US/Iran situation in video here.

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Police arrest man for giving his attractive wife macaroni and cheese?

I am that man.

Prior to 9/11, an overweight police officer in Stafford Springs, Connecticut, stopped by my house and stopped me on my way to work. Officer "Fat Frank" Prochaska want to dress me down for the audacity of feeding my wife Mac and Cheese. Frank would later make fun of me for the content of my phone calls and emails. He would also make comments if I had any small arguments with my wife.

I can still here him yelling at me telling me how fattening butter is. He was spraying spittle in my face as he yelled at me. He held back attacking me then, but later showed up at my house and started slamming me into my aluminum siding. He did not arrest me for his assaulting me, calling it "assaulting an officer" at that time.

Prochaska later arrested me for dialing 911 after a cocaine dealer bit my ear, punched me several times in the face, and then fled the scene. It took him about 6 weeks to rig my arrest and he then came in my house and arrested me in front of my wife, saying he would be back to talk to her later. I did not want drug dealing going on near my house. Prochaska interviewed Peter Panciera the guy who bit me and was a huge cocaine dealer, and his customers, and got them to change their sworn statements so Prochaska could arrest me for attacking Panciera's teeth with my ear and pummeling his fists with my face.

I faced a year and a half in jail, no deals, and about $5000 in fines for bleeding down to my underwear after I had been assaulted by a felon cocaine dealer.

Obviously Fat Frank was spying on me. I found out from Connecticut State Police LT Samuel Izzarelli that I would not have been a target for family break up, job loss, loss of my home, and being a target for assaults and other abuse at the hands of police informants, and being railroaded to prison if I had not chosen to be self-employed.

Self-employment is a terrorist act. Our international banker owners hate that. So, I am worse than any vandal, prostitute, drug dealer, thief, or common criminal, because international corporate organized crime does not like self-sufficiency and independent thought and employment.

So, I have to wonder if what I fed my wife, against the wishes of police, was the start of my downfall.

Thom Hartmann is the host of RT America's "The Big Picture". No matter what Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama do or say, Hartmann is there cheerleader and a cheerleader for the Democrats. Hartmann is pro global carbon tax. Al Gore and other elites are becoming billionaires taxing us to breathe. Have a one world elite government is foolish and dangerous. Lying war and international criminals should not be praised on some "news program".

I watched last night. Cellphone allegedly emit radiation that give you brain cancer, destroys your organs, makes you sterile, interrupts normal brain activity, interrupts hearing, and shortens your life. That expose was informative. The rest of it was mindless propaganda.

Thom Hartmann is for absolute gun control. Gun control is US Constitutional elimination. Free Speech and the rest of the so-called "protections" are being thrown out by our international corporate organized crime masters.

If RT wants Americans to view unbiased, actual news, Hartmann hurts their effort. I think Americans who are sick of mainstream news do not want to listen to the dribble and propaganda of the likes of Hartmann.

Sunday, June 23, 2013

NSA Spying and Police showing up to comment on what you ate for dinner?

I could not find a doctored Connecticut State Police evidence photo showing a dead African American shot up on a sidewalk where police deposited watermelon rinds and buckets containing fried chicken. The above image is possibly equally inflamatory and was [found here].

The NSA Edward Snowden scandal is waking up citizens all over the world. International bankers and corporate organized crime are behind intercepting all of your communications, internet usage, and all your activities in private, your bedroom, and even as you shower? Did the NSA, CIA, or FBI do anything about Connecticut State Police version of CSI forensics placing watermelon rinds and buckets of chicken around African Americans who lie dead on sidewalks to include captions that Connecticut State Police can use official emails to add captions to send each other racist emails? Should police show up at your door and then comment on what you had for dinner or if you have a minor argument with your significant other, family member, or spouse? I talk about what is in this paragraph at length and include links to the stories, [click here].

Elected officials, like State of Connecticut, Governor Dannel P. Malloy, can be informed and then to decide to do nothing. [Text of my letter to Malloy, click here]. Connecticut State Police have had their own version of the CIA to target citizens who question the police state, rigged courts, and the profiteering of the legislative lawyer cabal. Connecticut State Police use tax dollars to employ their street gang members, called state registered confidential police informants. Since police lie, manufacture evidence, file false police reports, commit perjury and are out to profiteer for themselves or the state everyday, I think the Newtown Sandyhook Schoolyard shooting hoax may have been perpetrated by Connecticut State Police Intelligence Unit members. I would not put it past the Connecticut State Police to wear masks and to shoot innocent children at a daycare or in a school to set up a patsy.

-

Solutions: Sousveillance

By
now we are all familiar with the concept of 'surveillance.' In the
Orwellian tyranny of the new normal, we are all gradually being made
aware that we are living in a panoptic society where everything we do
and say is being watched and recorded. So what is the answer to this
constant surveillance? Why not use the surveillance technology to keep
tabs on what the government is doing? Welcome to the world of
sousveillance. Join us today on The Corbett Report as we explore this
concept and the grassroots revolution in citizen media that it has made
possible.

Friday, June 21, 2013

Obama called war criminal in Irish Parliament

Barack Obama is a War Criminal. Obama was awarded the Peace Prize. For what, I don't know.

Obama is for International Bankers and for Corporate Organized Crime, not us. Obama is for Drone Bombing. Obama is for using tax dollars to carry out covert operations and murders to end the 2nd Amendment. Have you heard of the ATF black operation called, "Fast and Furious"? Obama and US Attorney General Eric Holder signed off on it. That makes both guilty of being accessories to murder, conspiracy to commit murder, racketeering, and other crimes. Obama is of the UN, not the US, so he is committing treason. Obama is against the US Constitution, not for it. So, Obama is a complete liar and cares not about the oath he took.

Monday, June 17, 2013

Washington Is Insane

In the 21st century the two hundred year-old propaganda that the
American people control their government has been completely shattered.
Both the Bush and Obama regimes have made it unmistakenly clear that the
American people don’t even influence, much less control, the
government. As far as Washington is concerned, the people are nothing
but chaff in the wind.

Polls demonstrate that 65% of the US population opposes US intervention
in Syria. Despite this clear indication of the people’s will, the Obama
regime is ramping up a propaganda case for more arming of Washington’s
mercenaries sent to overthrow the secular Syrian government and for a
“no-fly zone” over Syria, which, if Libya is the example, means US or
NATO aircraft attacking the Syrian army on the ground, thus serving as
the air force of Washington’s imported mercenaries, euphemistically
called “the Syrian rebels.”

Washington declared some time ago that the “red line” that would bring
Syria under Washington’s military attack was the Assad government’s use
of chemical weapons of mass destruction against Washington’s
mercenaries. Once this announcement was made, everyone with a brain
immediately knew that Washington would fabricate false intelligence that
Assad had used chemical weapons, just as Washington presented to the
United Nations the intentional lie via Secretary of State Colin Powell
that Saddam Hussein in Iraq had dangerous weapons of mass destruction.
Remember National Security Advisor Condi Rice’s image of a “mushroom
cloud over American cities?” Propagandistic lies were Washington’s
orders of the day.

And they still are.

Now Washington has fabricated the false intelligence,
and president obama has announced it with a straight face, that Syria’s
Assad has used sarin gas on several occasions and that between 100 and
150 “of his own people,” a euphemism for the US supplied foreign
mercenaries, have been killed by the weapon of mass destruction.

Think about that for a minute. As unfortunate as is any death from war,
is 100-150 deaths “mass destruction?” According to low-ball estimates,
the US-sponsored foreign mercenary invasion of Syria has cost 93,000
lives, of which 150 deaths amounts to 0.0016%. If we round up,
Washington’s 150 deaths comes to two-thousands of one percent.

In other words, 99.998% of the deaths did not cross the “red line.” But the 0.002 (rounded up) percent did.

Yes, I know. Washington’s position makes no sense. But when has it ever made any sense?

Let’s stretch our minds just a tiny bit farther. Assad knows about
Washington’s “red line.” It has been repeated over and over in order to
create in the minds of the distracted American public that there is a
real, valid reason for attacking Syria. Why would Assad use the
proscribed weapons of mass destruction in order to kill a measly 100-150
mercenaries when his army is mopping up the US mercenaries without the
use of gas and when Assad knows that the use of gas brings in the US
military against him?

As the Russian government made clear, Washington’s accusation is not
believable. No informed person could possibly believe it. No doubt, many
Americans wearing patriotism on their sleeves will fall for
Washington’s latest lie, but no one else in the world will. Even
Washington’s NATO puppets calling for attacking Syria know that the
justification for the attack is a lie. For the NATO puppets,
Washington’s money overwhelms integrity, for which the rewards are low.

The Russians certainly know that Washington is lying. The Russian
Foreign Minister Larov said: “The [Assad] government, as the opposition
is saying openly, is enjoying military success on the ground. The
[Assad] regime isn’t driven to the wall. What sense is there for the
regime to use chemical arms–especially in such small amounts.”

Larov is a relatively civilized person in the role of Russia’s main
diplomat. However, other Russian officials can be more pointed in their
dismissal of Washington’s latest blatant lies. Yury Ushakov, an aide to
Russian President Putin said: “The Americans tried to present us with
information on the use of chemical weapons by the [Assad] regime, but
frankly we thought that it was not convincing. We wouldn’t like to
invoke references to [the infamous lies of] Secretary of State Powell
[at the UN alleging Iraqi WMD], but the facts don’t look convincing in
our eyes.” Aleksey Pushkov, the chairman of the Russian Duma’s Foreign
Affairs Committee, cut to the chase. “The data about Assad’s use of
chemical weapons is fabricated by the same facility that made up the
lies about Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction. Obama is
walking George W. Bush’s path.”

Here in America no one will ever hear straight talk like this from the US presstitutes.

Orwellian double-speak is now the language of the United States
government. Secretary of State john kerry condemned Assad for harming
“peace talks” while the US arms its Syrian mercenaries.

Washington’s double-speak is now obvious to the world. Not only Assad,
but also the Russians, Chinese, Iranians, and every US puppet state
which includes all of NATO and Japan, are fully aware that Washington is
again lying through its teeth. The Russians, Chinese, and Iranians are
trying to avoid confrontation with Washington, as war with the modern
nuclear weapons would destroy all life on planet earth. What is striking
is that despite 24/7 brainwashing by the presstitutes, a large majority
of the American population opposes obama’s war on Syria.

This is good news. It means more Americans are developing the ability to
think independently of the lies Washington feeds to them.

What the neocon nazis, the bush/obama regime, and the presstitute media
have made clear is that Washington is going to push its agenda of world
hegemony to the point of starting World War III, which, of course, means
the end of life on earth.

Russia and China, either one of which can destroy the United States,
have learned that the US government is a liar and cannot be trusted. The
Libyan “no-fly” policy to which Russia and China agreed turned out to
be a NATO air attack on the Libyan army so that the CIA-sponsored
mercenaries could prevail.

Russia and China, having learned their lesson, are protesting
Washington’s assault on Syria that Washington pretends is a “civil war.”
If Syria falls, Russia and China know that Iran is next.

Iran is Russia’s underbelly, and for China Iran is 20% of its energy
imports. Both Russian and Chinese governments know that after Iran
falls, they are next. There is no other explanation for Washington
surrounding Russia with missile bases and surrounding China with naval
and air bases.

Both Russia and China are now preparing for the war that they see as
inevitable. Washington’s crazed, demented drive for world hegemony is
bringing unsuspecting Americans up against two countries with hydrogen
bombs whose combined population is five times the US population. In such
a conflict everyone dies.

Considering the utterly insane government ruling in Washington, if human
life exists in 2020, it will be a miracle. All the worry about future
Medicare and Social Security deficits is meaningless. There will be no
one here to collect the benefits.

This article first appeared at Paul Craig Roberts' new website Institute For Political Economy.
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic
Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was
columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators
Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His Internet
columns have attracted a worldwide following.

A former McDonald's worker in Pennsylvania is suing a franchiser owner
saying she was required to receive her wages through a debit card that
charged fees, resulting in some hourly employees receiving less than
minimum wage.

Natalie Gunshannon, a single mother, 27, said she and other workers were
paid through a JPMorgan Chase Payroll Card, which has a $1.50 fee for
ATM withdrawals, a $10 inactivity fee after 90 days, and a 75 cent
online payment fee per transaction and other fees.

Gunshannon, who filed a lawsuit in the Luzerne County Court of Common
Pleas, is hoping to have her case certified as a class action on behalf
of the other employees who were paid with the Payroll card.

"It's a violation of the law," said Gunshannon's attorney, Michael
Cefalo. "They're entitled to a choice to be paid in cash or check. Fees
connected to this debit card which employees have to pay to get their
wages which is unfair."

Gunshannon said she asked her employer if she could receive her wages
through direct deposit at her credit union, which she said did not
accept payments through the payroll card. She is suing under the
Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Act for unjust enrichment.

Franchisees Albert and Carol Mueller provided a statement to ABC News,
which read: "We value our employees and everything they do for our
organization. We are committed to providing them the best possible work
environment so they can deliver the fast, reliable service that our
customers expect.

We are aware of this matter. But at this time, we have
not seen a copy of the complaint. For this reason, it would be
inappropriate for us to comment further."

Suzanne Martindale, staff attorney with Consumers Union, said some
employers are motivated to pay wages with these payroll cards to cut the
cost of distributing paper checks.

"Employers are always looking for ways to cut costs," she said. "There
is incentive for employers to offer these cards but in some cases, they
don't negotiate with the payroll card provider over fees."

Gunshannon, who studied massage therapy, began working as an hourly
employee at a McDonald's in Shavertown, Pa., on April 24 after she was
unable to find jobs in her preferred field.

"There are no jobs in Luzerne County," she said.

She was paid about $7.44 an hour and worked 30 to 37 hours as a part-time worker.
Pennsylvania's basic minimum rate is $7.25 an hour.

After she was issued a JP Morgan Chase Payroll card, she requested a paper check from her employer.

A manager allegedly told her, "If you don't activate the card, there is
no way for us to pay you," according to the court complaint.

McDonald's managers and assistant managers "have the option to receive
wage compensation by way of direct deposit, thus avoiding fees," the
complaint states.

"McDonald's does not provide a choice for hourly employees to receive
their justly earned wages through a bank check, cash or direct deposit,"
the lawsuit said.

Gunshannon said the people with whom she worked were "nice" but she quit
after three weeks for not receiving her wages as requested. Gunshannon
said she is looking for jobs at other restaurants or home health work.

"This isn't something personal. I would just like to be paid for my work," she said.
However, some people say payroll debit cards can be beneficial to the unbanked or underbanked.

"Payroll debit cards offer real benefits for workers who are accustomed
to cashing paychecks at check cashers, including meaningful cost
savings, greater security and the convenience of an electronic payment
option," said Timothy Flacke, executive director of the nonprofit
Doorways to Dreams (D2D) Fund, which makes financial products for low-
and moderate-income consumers. "Of course, many people do not like to
have a product chosen for them, especially when there are fees
involved."

A growing number of employers use payroll cards to pay some of their
employers, but it violates both state and federal law to pay by payroll
card alone, according to Lauren Saunders, managing attorney with the
National Consumer Law Center.

"Employees should always have the choice of direct deposit to their own
bank account and also the choice of a check or cash," she said.
"Depending on the particular card, for unbanked employees, a payroll
card can be a safer, faster, more convenient and cheaper way of
receiving wages than paying to cash a paper check. But payroll cards
vary widely and some charge too many fees. Some payroll cards even have
expensive overdraft fees, which are completely inappropriate on payroll
cards or any other form of prepaid card."

Author and researcher Douglas Valentine of DouglasValentine.com joins us today to discuss his latest article, “Dirty Wars and Self-indulgence,”
a critique of Jeremy Scahill’s latest documentary. We talk about the
history that Scahill leaves out of his film and why he is being promoted
so heavily as a type of celebrity by the pseudo-alternative (and even
the mainstream) media.

The Program was designed to identify and "neutralize" (via infiltration, capture, terrorism, torture, and assassination) the infrastructure of the National Liberation Front of South Vietnam (NLF or Viet Cong).[2][3][4][5] Historian Douglas Valentine states that "Central to Phoenix is the fact that it targeted civilians, not soldiers".[6]
The major two components of the program were Provincial Reconnaissance
Units (PRUs) and regional interrogation centers. PRUs would kill and
capture suspected VC. They would also capture civilians who were thought
to have information on VC activities. Many of these civilians were then
taken to the interrogation centers where some were tortured in an
attempt to gain intelligence on VC activities in the area.[7]
The information extracted at the centers was then given to military
commanders, who would use it to task the PRU with further capture and
assassination missions.[7]
The program was in operation between 1965 and 1972, and similar
efforts existed both before and after that period. By 1972, Phoenix
operatives had "neutralized" 81,740 suspected NLF operatives, informants
and supporters, of whom 26,369 were killed.[8]

-

The world's most elite have been about consolidating wealth, resources, and power using banking and the corporation infrastructure for a very long time. Information gathering, both legal and illegal is a crucial key to success. It can mean all out spying and infiltration.

Outside money runs the inside of the US Government. It runs governments around the world.

There is a war on against American independence and the way of life. American society has been infiltrated. Everyone is being spied on 24/7. You can even be spied on going back in time. There are databases of your past conversations. So, anyone can be set up to look like they are guilty of something they are not. Anyone can be eliminated. Leaders of any potential resistance are either assimilated into the dark side, tortured, confined, or killed.

That is why [this is a big deal]. The NSA Edward Snowden Affair could shake the very ground in which you stand.

If GMO "food" kills insects, pollinating bees,birds, rats, mice etc isn't bad for humans too. This "food" is used to sterilize populations and make us sick. Monsanto has proven that is is more powerful than any US State, none are really standing up against this evil corporation. GMO is cancer. GMO is sickness. GMO is death.

The Corporate Final Solution

Eugenics now!

Text with video:

Bill Gates on people that "have no
benefit whatsoever". The troubling history of Bill Gates Sr "one of the
grandfathers of eugenics still going strong today" in the US. ABC
reports tens of thousands of women across the States from 1929 to 1974
forcibly sterilized. The Times notes Gates Jr has held a secret
billionaire summit with Michael Bloomberg and George Soros to "curb
overpopulation".

Why is Gates buying millions of dollars in
shares of Monsanto and funding sterilization programs, Monsanto's
response to our interview request, and what happens to scientists who
cross the genetically modified cyclops.

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Could China end up the hero in the Snowden Affair?

China could step up.

Why shouldn't they?

Being open is good business.

The corporate tyranny we are currently experiencing is just plain wrong.

When international corporate and banking cartels buy politicians, they are ripping you off. If China will help honestly expose the massive parasite that is harming the world, all Americans AND all world citizens will be better off.

If Americans, any Americans, are seeking political asylum, AND JUSTICE, and they go to China, what does that say about the current affairs IN AMERICA?

I am not anti-American. I am pro not wanting international organized crime holding me hostage, and the nation, under armed occupation.

We need more Bradley Mannings. we need more Julian Assanges, we need more Edward Snowdens. They are the real patriots who are making history in real time.

George Washington may have been a better liar and propagandist than any other major politician of his time. We need to see the elite liars for who they really are. We need leaders who are among us, not out against us. China could really shine. Let's see.

Any person anywhere in the world should be able to grow a garden, drink clean water, and not have to be taxed to make some banker, lawyer, or corporate asshole rich.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

100% Surveillance, Our Int. Corporate Masters, the Real Terrorists?

If most governments have been infiltrated by international organized
crime, a cabal of bankers and corporate pirates, is Edward Snowden
really a patriot, not a criminal? [story]

100%
surveillance did not make me safer pre-9/11. The Connecticut State
Police had their own version of the CIA pre-9/11 and the abuse has only
increased. I was asked to work for police to become a police officer. I
had no criminal record at the time. Police also were recruiting sex
criminals, thieves, drug dealers, vandals, prostitutes, thugs, and
bi-polar sociopaths to become part of their cop gang, called "State
Police Registered Confidential Informants". [my story]

Police
were out to enrich lawyers, confiscate property, destroy small business
owners and the self-employed, confiscate assets, and break up families.
Organized crime runs state facilities, builds them, and supplies them.
So as many children that can be taken away from good families and as
many citizens who can be ripped off and imprisoned makes the elite
richer.

In Stafford Springs, I was told by police trying to
recruit me that Stafford Springs, Connecticut, was one of the test
cities. It was pre-9/11 and there was 100% illegal domestic spying. All
phones calls were being recorded and monitored by police. All emails and
internet usage was looked into. Police were looking at medical records,
your bank account, who owed property taxes, who owned what. White male
police officers were also taking inventory of who had a "hot daughter",
wife, or girlfriend to take. Police officer had their own "comfort girl"
network, were profiting from heroin and crack cocaine trafficking,
break-ins, racketeering, steering business to organized crime, and going
after citizens to make lawyers and the state richer bringing in federal
tax dollars to increase the abuse.

Surveillance cameras and microphones were being strung up on telephone
poles in Stafford Springs, Connecticut, and probably your town,
pre-9/11.

Police also were recruiting
criminals to break in house of legal gun owners to steal guns from
honest citizens. Police were recruiting criminals to beat up, terrorize,
and even kill citizens on the [secret police enemies list].
Citizens on the list were to lose their jobs, their homes, family
unity, credit, retirement health insurance, sum total of their life's
work, and be railroaded to prison, beaten up, and/or murdered.

Are trillions of dollars being siphoned out of the economy to enrich the elite? Have you heard of the CAFR? [video and story]

Monday, June 10, 2013

The 29-year-old source behind the biggest intelligence leak in the NSA's
history explains his motives, his uncertain future and why he never
intended on hiding in the shadows

The individual responsible for one of the most significant leaks in US
political history is Edward Snowden, a 29-year-old former technical
assistant for the CIA
and current employee of the defence contractor Booz Allen Hamilton.
Snowden has been working at the National Security Agency for the last
four years as an employee of various outside contractors, including Booz
Allen and Dell.

The Guardian, after several days of interviews, is revealing his
identity at his request. From the moment he decided to disclose numerous
top-secret documents to the public, he was determined not to opt for
the protection of anonymity. "I have no intention of hiding who I am
because I know I have done nothing wrong," he said.

Snowden will go down in history as one of America's most consequential
whistleblowers, alongside Daniel Ellsberg and Bradley Manning. He is
responsible for handing over material from one of the world's most
secretive organisations – the NSA.

In a note accompanying the first set of documents he provided, he wrote:
"I understand that I will be made to suffer for my actions," but "I
will be satisfied if the federation of secret law, unequal pardon and
irresistible executive powers that rule the world that I love are
revealed even for an instant."

Despite his determination to be publicly unveiled, he repeatedly
insisted that he wants to avoid the media spotlight. "I don't want
public attention because I don't want the story to be about me. I want
it to be about what the US government is doing."

He does not fear the consequences of going public, he said, only that
doing so will distract attention from the issues raised by his
disclosures. "I know the media likes to personalise political debates,
and I know the government will demonise me."

Despite these fears, he remained hopeful his outing will not divert
attention from the substance of his disclosures. "I really want the
focus to be on these documents and the debate which I hope this will
trigger among citizens around the globe about what kind of world we want
to live in." He added: "My sole motive is to inform the public as to
that which is done in their name and that which is done against them."

He has had "a very comfortable life" that included a salary of roughly
$200,000, a girlfriend with whom he shared a home in Hawaii, a stable
career, and a family he loves. "I'm willing to sacrifice all of that
because I can't in good conscience allow the US government to destroy privacy,
internet freedom and basic liberties for people around the world with
this massive surveillance machine they're secretly building."

'I am not afraid, because this is the choice I've made'Three weeks ago,
Snowden made final preparations that resulted in last week's series of
blockbuster news stories. At the NSA office in Hawaii where he was
working, he copied the last set of documents he intended to disclose.

He then advised his NSA supervisor that he needed to be away from work
for "a couple of weeks" in order to receive treatment for epilepsy, a
condition he learned he suffers from after a series of seizures last
year.

As he packed his bags, he told his girlfriend that he had to be away for
a few weeks, though he said he was vague about the reason. "That is not
an uncommon occurrence for someone who has spent the last decade
working in the intelligence world."

On May 20, he boarded a flight to Hong Kong, where he has remained ever
since. He chose the city because "they have a spirited commitment to
free speech and the right of political dissent", and because he believed
that it was one of the few places in the world that both could and
would resist the dictates of the US government.

In the three weeks since he arrived, he has been ensconced in a hotel
room. "I've left the room maybe a total of three times during my entire
stay," he said. It is a plush hotel and, what with eating meals in his
room too, he has run up big bills.

He is deeply worried about being spied on. He lines the door of his
hotel room with pillows to prevent eavesdropping. He puts a large red
hood over his head and laptop when entering his passwords to prevent any
hidden cameras from detecting them.

Though that may sound like paranoia to some, Snowden has good reason for
such fears. He worked in the US intelligence world for almost a decade.
He knows that the biggest and most secretive surveillance organisation
in America, the NSA, along with the most powerful government on the
planet, is looking for him.

Since the disclosures began to emerge, he has watched television and
monitored the internet, hearing all the threats and vows of prosecution
emanating from Washington.

And he knows only too well the sophisticated technology available to
them and how easy it will be for them to find him. The NSA police and
other law enforcement officers have twice visited his home in Hawaii and
already contacted his girlfriend, though he believes that may have been
prompted by his absence from work, and not because of suspicions of any
connection to the leaks.

"All my options are bad," he said. The US could begin extradition
proceedings against him, a potentially problematic, lengthy and
unpredictable course for Washington. Or the Chinese government might
whisk him away for questioning, viewing him as a useful source of
information. Or he might end up being grabbed and bundled into a plane
bound for US territory.

"Yes, I could be rendered by the CIA. I could have people come after me.
Or any of the third-party partners. They work closely with a number of
other nations. Or they could pay off the Triads. Any of their agents or
assets," he said.

"We have got a CIA station just up the road – the consulate here in Hong
Kong – and I am sure they are going to be busy for the next week. And
that is a concern I will live with for the rest of my life, however long
that happens to be."

Having watched the Obama administration
prosecute whistleblowers at a historically unprecedented rate, he fully
expects the US government to attempt to use all its weight to punish
him. "I am not afraid," he said calmly, "because this is the choice I've
made."

He predicts the government will launch an investigation and "say I have
broken the Espionage Act and helped our enemies, but that can be used
against anyone who points out how massive and invasive the system has
become".

The only time he became emotional during the many hours of interviews
was when he pondered the impact his choices would have on his family,
many of whom work for the US government. "The only thing I fear is the
harmful effects on my family, who I won't be able to help any more.
That's what keeps me up at night," he said, his eyes welling up with
tears.

'You can't wait around for someone else to act'Snowden did not always
believe the US government posed a threat to his political values. He was
brought up originally in Elizabeth City, North Carolina. His family
moved later to Maryland, near the NSA headquarters in Fort Meade.

By his own admission, he was not a stellar student. In order to get the
credits necessary to obtain a high school diploma, he attended a
community college in Maryland, studying computing, but never completed
the coursework.

In 2003, he enlisted in the US army and began a training program to join
the Special Forces. Invoking the same principles that he now cites to
justify his leaks, he said: "I wanted to fight in the Iraq war because I
felt like I had an obligation as a human being to help free people from
oppression".

He recounted how his beliefs about the war's purpose were quickly
dispelled. "Most of the people training us seemed pumped up about
killing Arabs, not helping anyone," he said. After he broke both his
legs in a training accident, he was discharged.

After that, he got his first job in an NSA facility, working as a
security guard for one of the agency's covert facilities at the
University of Maryland. From there, he went to the CIA, where he worked
on IT security. His understanding of the internet and his talent for
computer programming enabled him to rise fairly quickly for someone who
lacked even a high school diploma.

By 2007, the CIA stationed him with diplomatic cover in Geneva,
Switzerland. His responsibility for maintaining computer network
security meant he had clearance to access a wide array of classified
documents.

That access, along with the almost three years he spent around CIA
officers, led him to begin seriously questioning the rightness of what
he saw.

He described as formative an incident in which he claimed CIA operatives
were attempting to recruit a Swiss banker to obtain secret banking
information. Snowden said they achieved this by purposely getting the
banker drunk and encouraging him to drive home in his car. When the
banker was arrested for drunk driving, the undercover agent seeking to
befriend him offered to help, and a bond was formed that led to
successful recruitment.

"Much of what I saw in Geneva really disillusioned me about how my
government functions and what its impact is in the world," he says. "I
realised that I was part of something that was doing far more harm than
good."

He said it was during his CIA stint in Geneva that he thought for the
first time about exposing government secrets. But, at the time, he chose
not to for two reasons.

First, he said: "Most of the secrets the CIA has are about people, not
machines and systems, so I didn't feel comfortable with disclosures that
I thought could endanger anyone". Secondly, the election of Barack
Obama in 2008 gave him hope that there would be real reforms, rendering
disclosures unnecessary.

He left the CIA in 2009 in order to take his first job working for a
private contractor that assigned him to a functioning NSA facility,
stationed on a military base in Japan. It was then, he said, that he
"watched as Obama advanced the very policies that I thought would be
reined in", and as a result, "I got hardened."

The primary lesson from this experience was that "you can't wait around
for someone else to act. I had been looking for leaders, but I realised
that leadership is about being the first to act."

Over the next three years, he learned just how all-consuming the NSA's
surveillance activities were, claiming "they are intent on making every
conversation and every form of behaviour in the world known to them".

He described how he once viewed the internet as "the most important
invention in all of human history". As an adolescent, he spent days at a
time "speaking to people with all sorts of views that I would never
have encountered on my own".

But he believed that the value of the internet, along with basic
privacy, is being rapidly destroyed by ubiquitous surveillance. "I don't
see myself as a hero," he said, "because what I'm doing is
self-interested: I don't want to live in a world where there's no
privacy and therefore no room for intellectual exploration and
creativity."

Once he reached the conclusion that the NSA's surveillance net would
soon be irrevocable, he said it was just a matter of time before he
chose to act. "What they're doing" poses "an existential threat to
democracy", he said.

A matter of principleAs strong as those beliefs are, there still remains
the question: why did he do it? Giving up his freedom and a privileged
lifestyle? "There are more important things than money. If I were
motivated by money, I could have sold these documents to any number of
countries and gotten very rich."

For him, it is a matter of principle. "The government has granted itself
power it is not entitled to. There is no public oversight. The result
is people like myself have the latitude to go further than they are
allowed to," he said.

His allegiance to internet freedom is reflected in the stickers on his
laptop: "I support Online Rights: Electronic Frontier Foundation," reads
one. Another hails the online organisation offering anonymity, the Tor
Project.

Asked by reporters to establish his authenticity to ensure he is not
some fantasist, he laid bare, without hesitation, his personal details,
from his social security number to his CIA ID and his expired diplomatic
passport. There is no shiftiness. Ask him about anything in his
personal life and he will answer.

He is quiet, smart, easy-going and self-effacing. A master on computers,
he seemed happiest when talking about the technical side of
surveillance, at a level of detail comprehensible probably only to
fellow communication specialists. But he showed intense passion when
talking about the value of privacy and how he felt it was being steadily
eroded by the behaviour of the intelligence services.

His manner was calm and relaxed but he has been understandably twitchy
since he went into hiding, waiting for the knock on the hotel door. A
fire alarm goes off. "That has not happened before," he said, betraying
anxiety wondering if was real, a test or a CIA ploy to get him out onto
the street.

Strewn about the side of his bed are his suitcase, a plate with the
remains of room-service breakfast, and a copy of Angler, the biography
of former vice-president Dick Cheney.

Ever since last week's news stories began to appear in the Guardian,
Snowden has vigilantly watched TV and read the internet to see the
effects of his choices. He seemed satisfied that the debate he longed to
provoke was finally taking place.

He lay, propped up against pillows, watching CNN's Wolf Blitzer ask a
discussion panel about government intrusion if they had any idea who the
leaker was. From 8,000 miles away, the leaker looked on impassively,
not even indulging in a wry smile.

Snowden said that he admires both Ellsberg and Manning, but argues that
there is one important distinction between himself and the army private,
whose trial coincidentally began the week Snowden's leaks began to make
news.

"I carefully evaluated every single document I disclosed to ensure that
each was legitimately in the public interest," he said. "There are all
sorts of documents that would have made a big impact that I didn't turn
over, because harming people isn't my goal. Transparency is."

He purposely chose, he said, to give the documents to journalists whose
judgment he trusted about what should be public and what should remain
concealed.

As for his future, he is vague. He hoped the publicity the leaks have
generated will offer him some protection, making it "harder for them to
get dirty".

He views his best hope as the possibility of asylum, with Iceland – with
its reputation of a champion of internet freedom – at the top of his
list. He knows that may prove a wish unfulfilled.

But after the intense political controversy he has already created with
just the first week's haul of stories, "I feel satisfied that this was
all worth it. I have no regrets."

Saturday, June 08, 2013

"Now You See Me" movie review

My take on the movie is that it is an international corporate organized crime and banker propaganda piece. Or it could even be a CIA like agent recruiting tool for the Illuminati if such an organization does exist.

4 magicians, or those involve in on the stage or in public trickery, are recruited to work together. A single man is blamed for the profiteering on insurance and other scams in New Orleans and nationwide. It is a single individual, not a bank, or corporation, that is blamed. Although "The All Seeing Eye" cult is about a secret society who takes from the rulers and gives back to the poor, according to the movie. So, the Bilderberg types are really philanthropists who care for common people?

What a bunch of crap.

The movie gets going early and never seems to bring back that same energy.

For me, since when is blatant propaganda entertainment?

The scene where Morgan Freeman is in a jail cell is ridiculous. The large cave with ancient bars is not even a little bit realistic. Since when are prisoners in the US ever kept in spacious areas, alone, with bars that are decades old and unpainted? Jails are crowded, well lit, have technology everywhere, and there is absolutely no privacy.

There are no real heroes in the New World Order, only villains.

"We are really the good guys," does not pass my BS meter.

I say "pass on this movie", and keep your money out of the corporate whores' pockets.

-

Connecticut legislators seem to be owned by Monsanto. Monsanto is served. Constituents are not. It is just more evidence of corporations and international bankers having us under armed occupation. They do not want to let us have a US Constitution.

Official in Connecticut seemed to be for what their constituents want, labeling of GMO poisoned "food". But, new developments show that Monsanto has deep pockets and can get what they want just by threatening to sick their lawyers on Connecticut.

Last week's report
that an unapproved strain of GM wheat developed by Monsanto was found
on an Oregon farm (tested more than 10 years ago but never approved for
commercial production) has rattled markets and led to a ban by Japan and
Korea on imports of U.S. wheat. This has the potential to spread and
threatens all of our exports. The European Union is urging members to
test what would amount to 80 percent of its imported U.S. wheat.

Mother Jones reports:The revelation had
immediate trade implications. About half the overall US wheat crop gets
exported—and Oregon’s wheat farmers export 90 percent of their output.
Many countries accept US-grown GM corn and soy for animal feed. But as
the USDA noted, no country on Earth has approved the sale of GM wheat.
And if Roundup Ready wheat is growing on one farm, our trading partners
might legitimately ask, what guarantee is there that it’s not growing on
others? Already, Japan has responded by suspending imports of US
wheat, Bloomberg reports.
Maximizing exports has always been a main priority of the Obama
Administration’s ag policy, and, the USDA is scrambling to investigate
the extent to which Roundup Ready wheat has entered the food supply, no
doubt hoping to stave off a full-on trade crisis. “We are taking this
very seriously,” a USDA official told Bloomberg. “We have a very active
investigation going on in several states in the western US.”

Genetically modified foods,
which are engineered to resist insecticides and herbicides, have been a
source of controversy in the U.S. and abroad. Supporters say the plants
boost crop yields, increasing the global food supply, while critics
argue the chemicals can be harmful to the environment and lead to
serious health problems. Protesters in cities across the country took to
the streets last week to demonstrate against Monsanto, the company most
synonymous with GMOs.
Eight national governments in the European Union
have already banned Monsanto's MON810 maize and other forms of GMO
cultivation in their countries under an environmental protection
provision known as the 'Safeguard Clause'.

Particularly fierce protests in Germany prompted the
government to introduce the measures in 2009 due to concerns that such
cultivation could lead to ecological degradation.
[...]
Austria, Bulgaria, France, Greece, Hungary, Luxembourg and most recently
Poland are among other EU member states enforcing the ban. In April,
Italy joined the ranks of EU states looking to ban the cultivation of GM
crops on its soil.

You know who Monsanto is. Even if you don’t recognize the
company name, you’ve come across some of its products: maybe you’ve used
Roundup weed killer on your lawn or garden, you’ve heard about the
debate over treating cows with the artificial growth hormone rBGH,
you’re worried about unlabeled genetically engineered organisms in your
food, or you’ve learned about the use of Agent Orange in the Vietnam
War, maybe from family members, coworkers or friends who suffered the
health consequences. These may not seem related, but they all are a
major part of Monsanto’s legacy.
The agriculture and life sciences company that’s known today as
Monsanto is only a recent development. Most of Monsanto’s history is
steeped in heavy industrial chemical production — a legacy that is
extremely at odds with the environmentally friendly, feed-the-world
image that the company spends millions trying to convey.
Monsanto is a global agricultural biotechnology company that
specializes in genetically engineered (GE) seeds and herbicides, most
notably Roundup herbicide and GE Roundup Ready seed.GE seeds have been
altered with inserted genetic material to exhibit traits that repel
pests or withstand the application of herbicides. In 2009, in the United
States alone, nearly all (93 percent) of soybeans and four-fifths (80
percent) of corn were grown with seeds containing Monsanto-patented
genetics.The company’s power and influence affects not only the U.S.
agricultural industry, but also political campaigns, regulatory
processes and the structure of agriculture systems all over the world.
See Full ReportPDF

The recent finding in Oregon confirms what environmentalists have been
saying for years and demonstrates two central points:1) The crop was
inadequately tested, and 2) It often takes years for problems to become
obvious.
For the Union of Concerned Scientists-
this is a big-I-told-you-so. Scientist Doug Gurian-Sherman sees this as
another unintended consequence of putting immortality genes into crops
like wheat and corn and soybeans to make them resistant to Roundup.
The idea is that farmers can more easily weed their fields. "On the
other hand, in other crops this has lead to what is literally, in the
east, and especially in the Southeast, moving into our Corn Belt, an
epidemic of weeds that are resistant to these herbicide, said
Gurian-Sherman."According to the millions of protestors
of Monsanto within the US and around the world, Monsanto is nothing
more than a corporate agriculture invader. Monsanto’s goal from
inception was to support farming communities and aid the farmer in
keeping up with consumer demands.

Senator Jeff Markley (D) Oregon is on it, and has demanded “USDA
must move forward quickly with its investigation to determine how
genetically engineered wheat arrived in this farmer’s field, and provide
clear guidance to the wheat farmers throughout the Northwest to ensure
that their product is marketable and meets the specifications of their
customers. In order to put the appropriate measures in place before the
upcoming wheat harvest, USDA must provide this guidance within the next
10 days.”
Merkley also noted that “this incident underscores the need for an
agency review of field-testing practices to determine how to avoid this
situation in the future.”Note: Merkley led an effort last week to repeal the “Monsanto Protection Act,”
a rider quietly and anonymously dropped into a must-pass spending bill
in March that stripped federal courts of their ability to require more
thorough safety review for some genetically modified seeds.Two amendments
related to genetically modified crops and specifically to the Monsanto
Company made news in Washington as lawmakers continue to work on a new
five-year farm bill.
One of the measures, introduced by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), sought
to ensure that individual states would have the ability to enforce
their own laws related to special labels for foods containing
genetically modified products also known as GMOs.
Thursday, May 23, Senators defeated that amendment by a vote of 27-71.

The world is also not happy that Monsanto, with a history of
questionable ethics practices and close ties to the government (FDA,
USDA, EPA, lobbyists and a Supreme Court Judge) has received protection
from future trouble. Slipped into a bill signed by President Barack
Obama back in March is something called the “Monsanto Protection Act”
which would shield Monsanto seeds and other GMO crops approved by the
USDA to be grown – even if there is action in the courts against them.
Another major reason for the march is what is happening to commercial
farmers around the globe. Monsanto’s patents on plant seeds no longer
allows farmers to save and grow their own seeds, requiring them to buy
new from Monsanto every year. If farmers attempt to grow their own
heirloom varieties, they are sued by the corporate giant and there is
increasing pressure for them to grown only GMO seeds. The extreme costs
of farming this way has forced closure of many farmers across America
and thousands of documented suicides by farmers in India.
Another reason for the march pertains to environmental concerns about
the toxicity of pesticides and herbicides and their effects on nature,
especially noticeable is the colony collapse disorder of pollinating
honey bees. When colonies collapse due to dying honey bees, we will see
fewer and fewer varieties of fruits, vegetables and nuts. The European
Nation has banned the pesticides which they attribute to colony collapse
disorder but as of yet the U.S. has not.

In a statement, the Center for Food Safety called on
regulators to suspend all field trials of genetically modified crops,
saying: "Our farmers and food supply are severely jeopardized by such
contamination episodes, yet the biotech industry responsible faces no
accountability."

Tags

Thursday, June 06, 2013

No money, no gas, 1000's of miles from home, only open bar after the hurricane ...

The bar I went into in Hammond, Louisiana, not too far from New Orleans.

It wasn't long after Hurricane Katrina. I was given a little station wagon with a 5 speed with about 200,000 miles. My father gave me $1500 to pay him back. He thought that maybe I'd fail. I paid him back with my first weekly paycheck of $2600, and that was after taxes. I ended up working as an insurance adjuster and had a life altering experience. Almost all in a good way.

More pictures with the one from above [click here]. Hurricane Katrina happened in 2005. So much has happened to me since. So much has happened politically. Check out my link. I stayed and partied on a former Southern Slave Plantation. I can say from experience, Barbecue there is like nowhere else. [My saga continues]

Tuesday, June 04, 2013

A Bushwhacked Sheriff in Newtown…

The plot thickens… Warning: Profane speech in use and may be offensive for some audience. Parental Discretion is Advised…Where was the Sheriff during the Sandy Hook shooting? The “shh…” of Newtown.
The Government Rag | 04Feb2013 | Opinion
The Fairfield County Sheriff’s office
(at one time) was a law enforcement agency that was established under
the original Constitution of Connecticut, which gave the publicly
elected High Sheriff the powers to enforce the lawful laws and the power
to arrest those that break the laws. However, it appears the Nation has
been missing a critical link in the Sandy Hook Elementary School
shooting investigation. That missing link is the powers of the
Connecticut Sheriff’s Department.
(Original photo retrieved from Big Stock photo).

In 1999, Governor John G. Rowland
called to abolish the sheriff system in Connecticut, due to financial
scandals that were discovered and investigated by Attorney General,
Richard Blumenthal. Edwin S. Mak, then, was the county Sheriff. In
December 2000, the Fairfield Sheriff’s office was bushwhacked and
disbanded. Before the disbanding, the Department of Administrative
Services was solely responsible for the testing process for special
deputy sheriffs.

In December 2000, Connecticut legislators replaced the Sheriff’s with the State Marshal Commission
(see below), which is under the command of the Department of
Administrative Services. This startling and undercover move was formed
under Public Act 00-99, with the creation of the Commission. On
11Nov2000, a Constitutional Amendment repealed the portion regarding
Sheriffs.

There are several references to the exact legal definition of the new amendment here. Some are listed below:

“Sec. 7. (NEW) (a)
“State marshal” means a qualified deputy sheriff incumbent on June 30,
2000, under section 6-38 of the general statutes, as amended by this
act, or appointed pursuant to section 8 of this act who shall have
authority to provide legal execution and service of process in the
counties in this state pursuant to section 6-38 of the general statutes,
as amended by this act, as an independent contractor compensated on a
fee for service basis, determined, subject to any minimum rate
promulgated by the state, by agreement with an attorney, court or public
agency requiring execution or service of process.”

“Sec. 8. (NEW) (a) There is
established a State Marshal Commission which shall consist of eight
members appointed as follows: (1) The Chief Justice shall appoint one
member who shall be a judge of the Superior Court; (2) the speaker of
the House of Representatives, the president pro tempore of the Senate,
the majority and minority leaders of the House of Representatives and
the majority and minority leaders of the Senate shall each appoint one
member; and (3) the Governor shall appoint one member who shall serve as
chairperson. No member of the commission shall be a state marshal,
except that two state marshals appointed by the State Marshals Advisory
Board in accordance with section 146 of this act shall serve as ex
officio, nonvoting members of the commission.”

“Sec. 10. (NEW) The Chief Court
Administrator shall employ, within available appropriations for such
purpose, such staff as are necessary to support the transferred
functions of the county sheriff system. The Chief Court Administrator
shall first offer such employment to qualified persons employed in the
administration of the county sheriff system on July 1, 2000.”

“Sec. 130. (NEW) All special deputy
sheriffs serving on the effective date of this act as prisoner custody
and transportation personnel and as court security personnel and all
deputy sheriffs serving on the effective date of this act as prisoner
custody or transportation personnel and as court security personnel who
elect to continue to perform such functions under section 142 of this
act shall continue to provide such prisoner custody, transportation or
court security services after the effective date of this act as judicial
marshals and shall be employees of the Judicial Department. The
Judicial Department shall recognize the bargaining unit of special
deputy sheriffs for the purpose of collective bargaining with judicial
marshals.”

“Sec. 143. (NEW) On or after December 1, 2000, no sheriff may appoint or remove any deputy sheriff or special deputy sheriff.”

“Sec. 144. (NEW) Before December 1,
2000, each high sheriff, in carrying out the duties of sheriff, shall
cooperate with the Chief Court Administrator to ensure the efficient
operation of the office of sheriff and transition of the functions of
said office to the Judicial Department.”

The above new changes listed are just some highlights of the shocking
amendment to the Constitution of Connecticut. The information is
alarming as it shows how the guts of America are being spiced from the
inside out and the indoctrination of disbanding the Sheriff’s
Departments in America are in full swing. Of course, it is all in the
name of saving the taxpayer a Federal Reserve note and keeping us all
safe from the lone wolf. Wrong! The bait and switch at Sandy Hook continues…(CORRUPTION ALERT) – Following
the ‘call’ for the disbanding of the Sheriff’s Departments in
Connecticut, it just so happens that in July 2004, an investigation was
launched into Governor Rowland’s office for numerous scandals. Rowland
was the 86th Governor of Connecticut (95-04) and a member of the
Republican Party.

“Rowland, a three-term governor, resigned
on July 1 amid a federal probe and a legislative impeachment inquiry.
The source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Rowland will plead
guilty to unspecified charges to avoid indictment and end the two-year
long investigation into corruption in his administration.”

“Rowland resigned amid
legislative hearings that threatened to lead to his impeachment. Rell
will fill the remainder of his term, which expires after the November
2006 elections.”

“In September, Rowland’s former co-chief
of staff and a major state construction contractor pleaded not guilty
to charges they ran a criminal organization from the governor’s office,
trading contracts for gold coins, expensive meals and limousine trips.”

“A 15-count indictment accused former
co-chief of staff Peter N. Ellef, his son Peter Ellef II and contractor
William Tomasso of conspiring to steer state contracts from 1997 to
2003.”

“A letter mailed out today: Federal Inmate # 15623-014, Ex-Governor (CT) John G. Rowland FCI LORETTO FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P.O. BOX 1000 LORETTO, PA 15940”“Dear Federal Inmate # 15623-014, SHITBAG, Ex Connecticut Governor, John G. Rowland, You deserve to spend your life in prison or be hung for treason, you piece of shit. When you look in the mirror, it is the man in the mirror that put you where you are now. Maybe my hours, efforts, and mental
concentration of wanting you in prison, disgraced, without the comfort
of your wife, family, to lose the respect of those around you, and for
your life being forever altered and tarnished may have not happened, but
for me. I live for this day, and to mail this
letter, that is what got me through the anger of having been put in
prison for complaining to your office about being pissed off about
heroin and crack cocaine being sold off my Stafford Springs Connecticut
yard by teens fighting, swilling beer, smoking pot, using my yard as a
toilet, and a hangout for sex orgies, asking that something be done
about that, Connecticut State Police misconduct, and the bias and
unlawfulness of the Connecticut Court System, which is merely a revenue
collection system, manned by armed revenue collectors, police, and Mafia
Dons, Members of the Connecticut Judiciary. If there is justice in America the
RICO statutes should be used to punish you, the former head of the
Connecticut State Police, the rogue judges, and others that were part of
your criminal empire. You probably, with your charisma and contacts, would have been the next Republic(an) Golden Boy, the man to succeed Bush 2. But, no, you sit in prison, with absolutely no chance of political office, or even voting in an election, ever again. You’re welcome, asshole. Thank me, no, thank yourself, you disgusting, lying piece of shit.”

“Blumenthal served for 20
years as Connecticut’s attorney general before coming off the bench in
2010 to run for the seat of fellow Democrat Christopher Dodd, who
retired and is now the head of the Motion Picture Association of
America.”“A sound bite machine who was known for
being an activist attorney general and loyalist to President Obama on
issues such as the Affordable Care Act, Blumenthal stood next to Holder
at the 10th anniversary observance of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks at
Ground Zero.Holder is expected to stay on as AG for only one year in
Obama’s second term.”

Blumenthal also was accused of ‘misstating’ his military record at one point. According to ABC News, Blumenthal was quoted:

“Now, on a few occasions I
have misspoken about my service, and I regret that and I take full
responsibility,” he said at a news conference at a Veterans of Foreign
Wars post in West Hartford. “But I will not allow anyone to take a few
misplaced words and impugn my record of service to our country.”“Blumenthal spoke one day after a
published report revealed that the Democratic senatorial candidate never
served in Vietnam despite repeated public claims to the contrary.”“The bombshell dropped as Blumenthal,
Connecticut’s attorney general, seeks the seat being vacated by
Democratic Sen. Christopher Dodd.”

Most disheartening, is the shocking discovery that the Citizens of
Connecticut voted in 2000 to eliminate the sheriff’s departments! The
poll shows 65.6% (585,155 votes) to eliminate the county Sheriff. WHAT?
Hummmm, were all the Citizens sleeping sound out there, as an apparent
hostile takeover of the Fairfield Sheriff’s Department was taken under
siege? Were they tricked through mind-control to ‘oust’ the Sheriff?
This cannot be real, right? Yes, and my last question is has anyone
requested that the ballots be recounted??? This is a very scary move for
the nation to eliminate the county sheriff (Snipet Ballotpedia). As we
all know, there is a hostile take-over and they want every Sheriff in America on the run….MEET THE COMMISSION THAT TOOK OVER THE FAIRFIELD SHERIFF’S OFFICE!
According to the State Marshal Commission’s website,

“it was created by Public
Act 00-99, in 2000. Chapter 78 of the Connecticut General Statutes sets
forth the law covering the state marshal system. Pursuant to Conn. Gen.
Stat. Sec. 6-38b the State Marshal Commission consists of eight members
appointed by the specified executive, judicial and legislative branch
authorities. The term for members is three years. There are also two
Ex-Officio members of the Commission from the State Marshals Advisory
Board.”

Currently, there are only the following names of the Commission listed:Commission Members (Appointed by the specified executive, judicial, and legislative branch authorities) Hope C. Seeley, Esquire – (Chairperson)
University of Connecticut; Criminal Practice Committee by Chief Justice
of Connecticut Supreme Court; Conn Criminal Defense Lawyer’s
Association; CBA’s Trial Advocacy Institute; Hartford County Bar
Association; Best Lawyer’s in America; Community Partners in Action;
Accepted Bar Admission: Conn. 89’; U. S. District Court, U.S. District
of Connecticut; U.S. Court of Appeals 2nd Circuit; American Trial
Lawyers Association.
(Photo obtained by Santos-Seeley).
Seeley was part of the defense team for former corrupt Chief
Executive Officer of Hartford, CT, Eddie Perez. The Chief Executive
position used to be called the ‘Mayor’ of the city until there were
changes within the city charter in 2002. Perez was convictedof
five felony corruption charges, which included bribery, fabricating
evidence, and conspiracy to fabricate evidence, and later extortion.Vincent Mauro, Jr. – Special
Council – Connecticut State Senate; Special Council to Majority leader;
Senator Martin Looney (D); New Haven. Quinnipiac University Law, New
Haven, Inc.; New Haven Shelter for Women and children; Democratic
Senator Majority PAC; N. Haven City government; member of five-person
board of Fire Commissioners, Board of Aldemen; non-attorney member of the Statewide Grievance Committee.Photo obtained by New Haven Independent).
According to an article by Courant,

“Some of the powerful are
not elected. In the press of business, staff members claim a dangerous
share of dominion over the legislature. That’s why a brigade of
lobbyists wrote checks and headed to New Haven on March 29 to underwrite
and attend a roast for Vincent E. Mauro, Jr., special counsel to the
majority leader, Sen. Martin Looney, D-New Haven.”“The roast, to benefit Life Haven, Inc.,
which operates a New Haven shelter for women and children, demonstrated
how power flows away from the public in Connecticut. Let’s assume that
Life Haven, Inc., does good work. Congratulations to them for that.
That’s not why the permanent residents of the Capital village made their
way to St. Mary’s basement hall on the 29. They were there because
Mauro is a key player in deciding the flow of business in the state
Senate.”“ Connecticut government has become an
enormous enterprise. It spends $20 billion a year and intrudes on every
aspect of our lives. It can hinder businesses. It rewards the
influential with millions in corporate welfare. It has the power, which
it often uses, to stifle opportunity and chase away the innovative. It
can also, for example, regulate or ignore corporate mergers. That may be
why a generous complement of lobbyists from Northeast Utilities
supported the Mauro event, no doubt laughing with gusto at the jokes and
congratulating Mauro on his community spirit.”

Mauro’s father died at 44 in a car accident, but was also elected to
the New Haven Board and served as the board’s president and as
Democratic chairperson for the town. The City then honored Mauro and
named a school on Orchard Street after him in 1988. He was then honored
later when his name was attached to Mauro-Sheridan Science, Technology,
and Communications School.Mildred Torres-Ferguson – Democratic Town Committee in Meriden; Treasure of Christopher G. Donovan (D) Dist. #84 (photo obtained My Record Journal).
In 2009, a complaint was filed by Christopher Healy, Wethersfield to the STATE OF CONNECTICUT- STATE ELECTIONS ENFORCEMENT COMMISSION,
and brought forth evidence that Mildred Torres-Ferguson’s daughter
stole funds from the election fund. After stealing the campaign’s credit
card, she racked up a $441.88 charge. The daughter then stole the card
again and charged an additional $1747.15. Torres-Ferguson admitted that
the theft took place but blamed her daughter’s alleged mental illness
and unruliness as the reason for her actions. Therefore, blatantly
speaking – she pulled the sympathetic act to get her daughter out of hot
water! Everyone needs to feel sorry for the mentally ill, right? When a
child steals, it can now be blamed and excused on the mental illness??
Hummmm, is this another clue into the Medicolegal agenda?
The Commission’s Conclusion and Findings (ORDER),

“13. Considering the
forgoing findings, facts, and circumstances, the Commission declines to
pursue the matter further as against either Respondent Torres-Ferguson
or her daughter.”

So let me get this straight… as long as someone professes that a
mental illness is to blame, the Commission will disregard the entire
crime? Please – can’t you people see what the heck is going down here in
America?Robert P. LaTorraca –
American Medical Response/CEO (retired); Banton Construction; United
Cleaning & Restoration LLC, LaTorraca Consulting; New Haven
Ambulance; emergency management (photo obtained by Hamden Fire
Retirees); Quinnipiac College and State University; Southern Connecticut
State University (Photo obtained by Hamden Fire Retiree’s Association).Campaign money shows he was the CEO of American Medical Response. In the November 09, 2006 Congressional Record – Extension of remarks, made a tribute to LaTorraca on this retirement.

“Bob distinguished himself
as an innovator by developing the first proprietary accounts receivable
system in the state and establishing the first neonatal transport
contract with Yale-New Haven Hospital. When, in the early nineties, New
Haven Ambulance Service became one of the four founding companies of
American Medical Response, Bob was named Chief Operating Officer for
Connecticut and for the Northeast Operations just a few years
later.Leading a team of more than eight thousand employees in 23 states
prior to his retirement, Bob achieved great professional success,
however, his innumerable contributions to communities in need are what
set him apart.Most recently, and perhaps most notably,
were the actions he took following two of the most devastating events
in our Nation’s history. On September 11, 2001, he personally led a
contingent of American Medical Response personnel from both Connecticut
and New York to support of Fire Department of New York, and, just this
past year, Bob has made a number of trips to assist in the ongoing
relief efforts in Mississippi in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Bob has
also left an indelible mark on his own community with his outstanding
efforts on behalf of a variety of local organizations and committees.
The Hamden Fire Commission, the Shirley Frank Foundation, the Clelian
Adult Daycare Center, and Mothers Against Drunk Driving are just a few
of those who have benefited from Bob’s support.”

“(1) “Applied behavior
analysis” means the design, implementation and evaluation of
environmental modifications, using behavioral stimuli and consequences,
including the use of direct observation, measurement and functional
analysis of the relationship between environment and behavior, to
produce socially significant improvement in human behavior.(2) “Autism services provider” means any person, entity or group that provides treatment for autism spectrum disorders.(3) “Behavioral therapy” means
interactive therapies derived from evidence-based research that are
provided to children less than thirteen years of age, including, but not
limited to, applied behavior analysis that is provided or supervised by
a behavior analyst who is certified by the Behavior Analyst
Certification Board.”

“The gene mutations are
extremely rare and together account for a tiny fraction of autism cases —
in these studies, only a handful of children. Experts said the new
research gave scientists something they had not had: a clear strategy
for building some understanding of the disease’s biological basis.”

IS this the‘EVIL’ gene, that they are looking for in Adam Lanza’s DNA?
SPOOKY…
Okay all, it’s all just a conspiracy theory… at the sound of my voice you will all go back to sleep…
So, let me get this straight…. If Adam Lanza had Autism and if he was
on medication, then he would have to have insurance. His mother, Nancy
Lanza got a healthy check from her x-Peter Lanza according to a divorce
settlement. The following section is included in the Connecticut Autism
Insurance Law:

“(c) Such policy shall
provide coverage for the following, provided such treatments are
medically necessary and are prescribed or ordered by a licensed
physician, licensed psychologist or licensed clinical social worker for
an insured who is diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder, in
accordance with a treatment plan developed by a licensed physician,
licensed psychologist or licensed clinical social worker in a manner
consistent with the most recent report or recommendations of the
American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Child and
Adolescent Psychiatry or the American Psychological Association”

“His high school classmates
took little notice of Mr. Lanza, but school officials did. Newtown
school officials assigned a permanent psychologist to Mr. Lanza in his
freshman year of high school in 2007, and flagged him to the school’s
security chief when he was still in middle school, a former school
official said. “He was very withdrawn and meek,” said Mr. Novia, who
left the district in 2008. He said Mr. Lanza “was one of those freshmen
coming in very much in need of watching.”

This would coincide with the Insurance law. The only question is who
is this psychologist and why haven’t we heard from him/her???
The only psychologist that is mentioned in the whole mass murder at
Sandy Hook is Mary (Greene) Sherlach, who was allegedly killed at the
hands of Adam Lanza. Sherlach is reported to have worked at the school
for 18 years as a psychologist and worked with children that had mental health. She is married to William (Bill) Sherlach, who works at The 1st Group at Morgan Stanley and is listed as Vice President.
Unfortunately, three employees of Morgan Stanley were directly
effected by the shooting. Morgan Stanley donated $150,000 to charities
that are honoring the victims. According to Dealbook NY Times,

“Mary Sherlach, the school
psychologist, was married to Bill Sherlach, a financial adviser at the
bank. Jack Pinto, 6, was the son of Dean Pinto, a lawyer at Morgan
Stanley. Grace McDonnell, 7, was the niece of Paul Minella, who works in
the company’s capital markets division within Morgan Stanley’s wealth
management unit.”

Was Sherlach Adam Lanza’s psychologist? I could not any reports on
who he was actually assigned to but if someone would like to come
forward and correct me with the name of the psychologist, feel free…
At this time, the theory stands that Mary Sherlach may have been Adam
Lanza’s assigned psychologist. Did I mention that this was a conspiracy
theory and you can all go back to sleep now?
Rudikoff is married
to Dr. Robin Meryl Masheb, who is a psychiatrist and Professor of
Psychiatry at Yale University; American Psychiatric Association (APA);
NIH; National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) -
Other members include:Michael Cronin, Esq. (Vice-Chairperson)
Private Practice, Connecticut Bar AssociationSarah Holbrook, Esq.
Private Practice – ConnecticutEx –Officio Members (Non-voting members from the State Marshals Advisory Board)Marshal Lisa Stevenson –Hartford, CT Marshal, responsible for civil processes; Previously Deputy Sheriff – Hartford; State Marshal Advisory BoardMarshal Thomas Burke – Norwich, CTMarshal assigned to Newtown:Frank R. DeLucia – Ex Director of Nunnawauk Meadows;
Newtown City Government, Constable appointed by board of
Selectmen. Married to: Linda DeLucia – ReMax Real Estate, Western
Connecticut, Board Member Northern Fairfield County Association of
Realtors, Member NFCAR Grievance Committee; Founder Best of Brookfield
DeLucia addresses his feelings about the death of his friend, Glenn “Benny” Atkinson, aka the ‘9/11 flagman’ in a CT News article in January 2011.

“Although many people think
of patriotism and the 9-11 terrorist attacks when they drive by this
emblazoned flag, so many others think of Glenn Atkinson, at least those
who know the story of the man behind the flag.”

List of all Fairfield County MarshalsCONCLUSION -
Despite the corruption that took place within the Sheriff’s
Department at the time, there was an obviously agenda taking place to
oust the sheriffs long before it took place. How come there is a black
out on the Sheriff of Fairfield County? The Sheriff was bushwhacked
because there was an agenda as far back as 1999 or even before. Corrupt
Governor Rowland, along with his associates, were setting up a criminal
enterprise within the Governor’s office. Just because the Governor was
brought down, does that mean that the rest were? I doubt it…
This evidence alone should be alarming. Research concludes with
disbelief how the entire State of Connecticut is ran like a corporation
and an obvious criminal enterprise runs rampant within the State. The
Citizen’s of Connecticut made a critical mistake by voting to eliminate
the Sheriff’s Departments and strip the powers of the elected Sheriff’s
away. This ensures that the entire criminal enterprise is safely
protected and the Citizen’s are more than likely under some sort of
mind-control trance. This mind control technique could easily be
performed through education, television screens, technology,
indoctrination, disassociation techniques, trauma, and the latest and
notorious – fear. Maybe it is not even mind control, per say, it could
also be the dumbing down of America with your favorite teeth cleaner,
fluoride?
Recently, I had to endure a whole two months of the local radio
advertisements that included the word ‘executive order’ in petty
business advertisements and made it sound like a wonderful thing. See,
now when the mass hears the words ‘executive order’ they will feel it is
the safe and trusting thing to do. People, please turn off your local
stations and stop watching the tube! There is a world to fix out there!
Put these criminals out of business for mind-controlling the nation.
There is something seriously wrong when nearly 67% of the Connecticut
votes to eliminate the first & last line of defense in the sand
against tyranny and treason? Please…
Maybe it is not even mind-control and indoctrination at all… maybe it
is just plain election fraud. I just have a very difficult time
believing that the Citizen’s of Connecticut would vote the Sheriff out
without someone behind the curtain tagging the votes to the YES side…
What is even more shocking is that the law and arrest powers in
Connecticut lie in the hands of the State – not the Sheriff. Following
the shooting, each family member was assigned troopers. According to an
immediate release from CT’s Department of Emergency Services &
Public Protection (DESPP),(Note: DESPP’s Division includes- Homeland Security, Fire
Prevention & Control, Statewide Emergency Telecommunications, Police
Officers Standards & Training Council, Scientific Services, and
State Police. Under the direct command of Commissioner, Reuben F.
Bradford).

“The family of each victim
was assigned a Trooper or Officer to establish and maintain an open line
of communication. This was put into place so families of the victims
can have immediate contact related to any questions they may have and to
also provide State Police investigators the ability to communicate with
families without delay. The families have requested no press interviews
and we are asking that this request be honored.”

I bring this to you only because it is my duty as a Citizen
Journalist. I mean no harm or ill feelings to the family members and
victims of this alleged murderous rampage. This information is brought
forth to help advance the understanding of the current status of the
nation and the hostile-takeover that all Business Management majors are
taught in college. It is a hostile take-over people. It is not just DHS
running around staging shoot-em-ups. It is a real life blood bath taking
place behind the scenes. An Oath so secret that even the good guys are
afraid to speak of it.
Why do they want to disarm Americans all in the name of Mental Health
and security? Two simple reasons. One, because they have created a
mentally unstable generation of heavily medicated people, who have
undergone ‘behavior modifications’ that is now backfiring and out of
control. Second, they realize now the Nation has awakened to their
scientific experimentation and financial corruption. As long as they
continue to stage the FEAR-based trauma events (hoax or not) the goal to
turn our country into a deeper mind-controlled nation and to
disassociate the mind…“Whenever you have truth it must be given with love, or the message and the messenger will be rejected” - Mahatma Gandhi
Shhh…
Photo obtained by Global Research (Newtown, CT)See Charts
——————————————————————————————————————–