Offering a conservative counterbalance to the extreme left-coast liberalism of The Huffington Post

Monday, June 29, 2009

OBAMA IS COMFORTABLE WITH HATE SPEECH SPEAKER HARRY KNOX WHOM HE APPOINTED TO HIS ADVISORY COUNCIL ON FAITH

Harry Knox, a member of President Obama's administration,

recently appointed to

the President's Advisory Council on Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships

IS GUILTY OF HATE SPEECH!

Harry Knox is an anti-Catholic bigot.

He has chosen to live a lifestyle described by the Church as "disordered" and by the Bible as an "abomination."

Thus, Mr. Knox has taken it upon himself to lecture an organization that has brought the Good News of salvation to the world and saved civilization for over 2000 years and to criticize the Bible because he disagrees with the scriptures on homosexuality.

He has publicly referred to Pope Benedict XVI, one of the most highly respected theologians and religious leaders in the world, as a "discredited leader" and the Knights of Columbus, one of the largest charitable organizations in the world, as a "discredited army of oppression." He has accused the Pope of "harming people in the name of Jesus" because of the Pope's comments suggesting that condoms increase the spread of AIDS.

Dr. Green of Harvard University, researchers at the University of California, and an article in the British medical journal, "The Lancet," among others have agreed with the Pope that condoms have not been effective in the reduction of AIDS. The President of Uganda, the only country in Africa that has seem major reductions in AIDS cases, has confirmed that the major reduction in AIDS in that country were the result of programs promoting abstinence and fidelity, not condoms. In other words, the Pope was right.

When the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Right, CNS News, and a group of 20 prominent conservative Catholics and congressmen called on the President to remove Harry Knox from the faith-based council, the answer they received from a White House spokesperson was that the President is comfortable with the Advisory Council.

Would President Obama be comfortable with a racist, an anti-Semite, or a member of the KKK on the council or is anti-Catholicism the only bigotry that is acceptable? What kind of advice can a bigot give to a faith-based council? Do homosexual activists get a pass on "hate speech" while the rest of us are silenced?

Harry Knox must be removed from the council now!---

CCI statement on the Obama appointment of anti-Catholic Harry Knox to the President's Advisory Council on Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships

He is not eligible to bePresident of the United Statesbecause he is not a Natural Born Citizenas required by Article Two, Section One, Clause Five of the United States Constitution.

This is a fact REGARDLESS ofwhere he was born (Mombassa, Hawaii, Chicago, Mecca or Mars).

He is not eligiblebecause he was not born ofTWO PARENTSBOTH OF WHOM WERE UNITED STATES CITIZENSat the time of his birth as required by the Constitution.His father was a subject/ciitizenof Kenya/Great Britain at the time of his birth and afterwards.The FACT that he was not born of TWO US CITIZEN PARENTS is all that matters. The question of his birth certificate is a distraction (a distraction fostered by Obama’s supporters?) that ought not to occupy our time and resources.

However, it is possible that he is not a United Statescitizen at all even if he was born in Kenya, as three witnesses have testified. The reason is because his mother could not pass her US citizenship on to her son because she did not live continuously in the United States for five full years after her fourteenth birthday as required by the US immigration law in effect during that period of time.

Check it out:http://www.TheObamaFile.com/ObamaNaturalBorn.htmAlso, an excellent introductory primer on Obama Presiidential Eligibility is to be found at:http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm

His usurpation can only be corrected (1) by Congress through his Impeachment and Removal [something which will never happen in a Congress controlled by Pelosi/Reid], or (2) it can becorrected by his resignation, which could happen if the public presssure on him to resign becomes great enough, or (3) by his removal by the United States Supreme Court affirming a Quo Warranto decision of the United States Federal District Court for the District of Columbia [which process Attorney General Eric Holder would never allow to even begin] or (4) by an amendment to the Constitution,which will never happen because that again would require the agreement of a Congress controlled by Pelosi/Reid._

HERE IS THE QUESTION WHICH EVERY AMERICAN CITIZEN SHOULD BE ASKING HIS OR HER CONGRESSMAN AND SENATORS

“During the 2008 election, then Senator Obama published a statement at his website which said that his birth status was ‘governed’ by the British Nationality Act of 1948. Can you please tell me, and the American people, how a person governed - at birth - by British law, can be a natural born citizen of the United States and thus constitutionally eligible to be President of the United States?”

Post a Comment

Translate This Blog

Followers

Subscribe To

Search This Blog

About Me

A Texan who loves the truth and hates the lying, cheating, and deliberate prevarication that characterizes so much of our civic discourse these days.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RIPOSTE, n. 1. Fencing: a quick thrust after parrying a lunge 2. a quick sharp return in speech or action; counterstroke.
- The Random House Dictionary of the English Language...........
You can contact me by sending an email to me at: leorugiens23@gmail.com