Now … put those two things together, and we
have: “Society is civilised
by THE SAME Rules of
Law”. Yes?

So … let’s look at these Rules (actually, just
one of them
will do … the argument is always the same):

Can you enforce someone else to pay you a chunk of what
you earn? Each
week, or each month? With the threat of doing “nasty things to
you” … if you
don’t co-operate?

No … you can’t. You KNOW that’s NOT one of
the possible Rules.

But, that’s what “Governments” do. It’s called
“Income Tax”.

So … we IMMEDIATELY have the situation whereby
“There
is one Rule for you … and a different one for them” …
don’t we?

Consequently it is impossible to hold the
statement: “Society is civilised by THE SAME Rules of Law” as, actually, true.

It CANNOT be true.

It can NEVER be true … while the BELIEF of
Statism persists
within your head.

So … if The Rules must be different … by
definition … who is
making them?

Oh … “The Government”! The “Statists”!

They make the Rules for YOU … and MUST
MAKE a different set
for THEMSELVES!

Now, if they are making a different set for
themselves, what
is to stop them providing the means to enable corruption? Answer:
Nothing.
Nothing at all.

Nothing to stop them.

They are, what is known as: “A Law unto themselves”.

And they MUST be … in order to actually BE “a
Government”.

So, when you see evidence of utter corruption
within
Corporations & Government Agencies (etc.) … why are you upset?
Why are you
surprised? It almost goes without saying: THAT’S WHAT WILL HAPPEN!

It’s ‘normal’. Perfectly normal. It’s
‘natural’. It’s a
natural consequence of TWO DIFFERENT SETS OF RULES.

If one set – the set that applies to you – is a
MORAL SET …
and the set that applies to the Statists is a DIFFERENT SET … then
THEIR SET
must be IMMORAL.

If the Statists’ SET is IMMORAL … then it must
be CORRUPT …
BY DEFINITION.

Q.E.D.

While you continue to believe in, and support
(by voting) Statism,
you are giving oxygen to a SECOND CORRUPT SET of Rules which apply
to THEM …
and not to YOU.

And, if that’s the case, why should you be
angry … upset … when you
discover (for example) paedophilia
(but that’s just one example) is an endemic part of THEIR RULE
SET?

If you were sane, you’d say: “Oh yes … that’s OK
… My Rules –
the ones I live by – don’t apply to THEM. So, if paedophilia
is in THEIR RULE
SET, that’s fine. No problem!”

Of course, if you were INSANE … and completely
IRRATIONAL … you
COULD get very upset about “paedophilia in the highest echelons of
Government” …
couldn’t you? But that
would only be if
you were IRRATIONAL … because, after all, you are perfectly happy
to support
THE IDEA OF GOVERNMENT … and THE IDEA OF TWO RULE SETS … by
VOTING.

By DOUBLE-THINKING.

Why, for example, should you be upset about the
way women
are dismissed when they claim to have been raped? After, THEIR
RULE SET
contains the Rule: “We don’t give a flying fuck about women being raped …
largely because …
from our point of view … they generally deserve it”.

And that’s one of THEIR RULES - that you
supported - by
Voting.

Of course, if you DO get upset by all these
things … what is
your remedy?

DON’T FUCKING VOTE FOR IT!

DON’T FUCKING VOTE … for TWO SETS OF RULES.

Stick ONE SET OF RULES, viz:

1.You own yourself … and
no-one else owns you i.e.
you are Sovereign.

2.You can do anything you
like EXCEPT
impinge upon the
Sovereignty (Freedom) of another. Which means YOU NEVER –INITIATE
– any
form of force or violence … under any circumstances.

3.BUT anyone, who’s
Sovereignty/Freedom is
impinged upon, has the innate right to SELF-DEFENCE … WHATEVER
THAT TAKES. For
example: You would be perfectly entitled to employ the “George
Carlin” method
of self defence, if someone was threatening you. You would be
perfectly entitled
to blow their head off. And – if turned out that “they didn’t
really mean it” …
too fucking bad.

That would be the Rule Set … and ALL would be
EQUAL under
it.

It’s called: ANARCHY … which is synonymous with
Volutaryism,
Freedom, and One Rule Set (i.e. The Common Law) for everyone.

You want to try to argue FOR Statism? ANY KIND
of Statism? Oh ... good luck!