Blog dedicated to Freedom of Speech and all human beings who are willing to stand up for innocent people caught in this system and against corrupt political entities and opportunistic frauds. Some celebrity gossip also.

Saturday, March 26, 2011

Cohen, An Alleged Buddhist, Aligns Himself With Gianelli-Blogonaut Who Absolutely Slanders Shamarpa

Blogonaut is now referring to you as a "Sheep Dog." He is dangerously unstable. Please keep in mind that Cohen was Joshu Sasaki Roshi's emissary to the 16th Gyalwa Karmapa. This attack on you works well for "Mick Brown," naturally.

Please continue to say prayers for my family. These people are obviously stark raving lunatics. I will, of course, address the slander relating to you in my Motion to Vacate and Complaint against Blogonaut. It's shameless, pathetic, and outrageous. Sounds like "pure Cohen" from my perspective.

BWAHAHAHAH!!! Damn, I spit coffee on my monitor again. Now you all have to stop this. Geeez, I go out of town overnight and I return to 38 messages to catch up on. I think before I read anything on this blog again, I will carefully remove all liquids from the area so I can stop spitting on my screen. The 14th Sheepdog - LMAO - that's the best one I've seen yet. Perhaps the 14th Sheepdog would like to make the acquaintance of the 7th Great Dane in my presence. Perhaps we can get all our Sherpas together for a spiritual awakening - think tent revival!! We could invite the Sharmapa, but I doubt the Chinese would let him come. Thank you all for the laughs. Keep them coming. Kelley is getting a bit boring repeating the same lies over and over again. LONG LIVE THE 14TH SHEEPDOG. LONG LIVE THE 7TH GREAT DANE.

Blogonaut continues to trash you. This is where it has ended up. I get dragged into Phillip's deranged trials and you end up being trashed. Both of my children have been
relentlessly attacked by Blogonaut. Bruce Cutler called Donna Clarkson a money grubber. Five experts testified that she shot herself and Gianelli himself has said all five
would not lie. You have to question Donna Clarkson's motive. And you have to look at the trash on the internet. The top two contenders for the most vile are Michelle Blaine and Sprocket - who is apparently Donna Clarkson's mouthpiece. That tells me all I need to know about Donna Clarkson. Also, they are cyber-terrorists and bullies.

Blogonaut is not responsible for the email of mine he posted. That means he's responsible for everything he's posted about me. He has to call Bruce Cutler to the witness stand to testify to what Blogoat has attributed to him.

In any event, Roman Polanski has now replaced me as the featured article. The Appeal's Court said n investigation was urgent, seemed disturbed by the DA, and is playing
hot potatoe (sic). I will have to write Roman Polanski a thank you note for shifting Blogonaut's obsession away from me for a moment.

It's pure California, pure Los Angeles. It's the favorite past time. They are never held accountable for their actions or so they think.

Please do a puja. I'll continue to document the slander about you.

This Blog and the comments will absolutely be addressed in my Motion to Vacate and Complaint against Gianelli. He has you in his sights - he's now raised "Mick Brown" as an issue. I think he's out of his league. In fact, I think they all are.

NOTE: Phil Spector and his legal team have been advised that I would like Bruce Cutler to take the stand with respect to these allegations. I would also like Bruce Cutler to address his views on why a man who would slander the Sharmapa; infer that his dog shits/pukes religious ceremonies on carpets, has a right to be using Mr. Cutler to defend himself. The notion is absurd and preposterous.

Dear Kelley:

We think, Ms. Lynch that we will call you to the stand pursuant to Evidence Code Section 776(a) to establish that you left 10-15 extended voice messages PER DAY on Bruce Cutler's office voice mail system during a TWO YEAR time period. We will also testify to our conversation with Bruce Cutler to that effect—as well as the fact that he told us that he viewed you as the worst kind of “telephone stalker”—not for the truth of the matter, but rather to negate the essential element of malice. (See California Evidence Code Section 1250 (a) (1).) [Don’t try to tell us how to get evidence admitted at trial; We are quite sure that YOU are out of YOUR “league” in a California courtroom. ]

PS: To The 14th Sheepdog:

Please DO NOT do another “puja”; our maid is still trying to clean the living room carpet after your last "puja"--you naughty little dog you.

There is NO "connection" between this blog, its editor, and Leonard Conen, Alan Jackson, MIchelle Blaine, Sprocket, or ANY other person, blog, attorney, or entity--except in your own very desturbed mind.

Blogonaut’s DOG is shitting on Buddhism and the Sharmapa now. We're in good company. Cohen liked to look at people defecating on one another. Nasty stuff. Your brother should recall this - I came home and talked to him about the nasty things "someone" showed me on the internet that day.

Love,
Mother

Dear Kelley Ann:

The only one who has ever mentioned “Shitting” or “defecating” in reference to ANYONE is YOU .

BTW, nice email to your son mom—cc—of course—to the IRS, the press, and your usual spam victims, including us.

In response to your Open Letter responding to my note to my son (who advised you to CEASE and DESIST and informed you that he felt you THREATENED him): I think you're a PIG. […]People believe you're part of Cohen's legal team.

Kelley Lynch

Dear Kelley:

This was no “note” to your son that you sent us; it was a mass distributed written communiqué curiously emailed to your son Rutger (whom you live with—therefore rendering emails to him a little silly to begin with) and copied to the IRS, the FBI, the National Enquirer, and dozens of others on your spam list.

In fact, you have copied EVERY email that you have sent to two sons to this office (as well as your huge spam distribution list that includes the IRS).

We think it plain and beyond disputing that it is YOU and only you that has attempted to embroil your children and family in your own unique brand of over-the-top, manufactured drama.

Last, the only emails that Rutger sent to us were quite respectful, did not assert that we had “threatened” him, and instead apologized for your distressing conduct that he is quite powerless to control and wishes you would stop. And, of course, Rutger does not copy his emails to the IRS, the FBI, the National Enquirer and dozens of others; YOU are the only one who does that.

The only person that BOTH of your son’s have asked to “cease and desist” is YOU.

Bald faced lie about both of my sons.

”People” think that I am a part of Leonard Cohen’s legal team? The only person demented enough to think that is YOU.

If you don’t want us to post and comment on your vile, nutty emails, don’t send them.

subjectRe: CEASE AND DESIST BLOGONAUT - YOU ARE A DERANGED LIAR WHO IS OBSESSED WITH ME AND MY FAMILY

Detract your statements. Stop maliciously slandering me. Do not continue to harass my family. I view that as witness tampering.

There is no connection between your blog, its editor, and Leonard Cohen, Alan Jackson, Michelle Blaine, Sprocket, or ANY other person?

That’s what you say. I already know that you’re a pathological liar. That’s why my Mother and I view as dangerously unstable. This could also be why my Mother is concerned that you are your fellow cyber-terrorists could push my younger son into committing suicide. I know that’s a game for you. It’s deadly serious for me.

Dear Kelley:

Your own words have made our point more eloquently that we ever could.

There is nothing to “detract” (ha!). “Deadly”, “terrorist”, “witness tampering”!

Lynch, the only one in all of God's creation who may be "pushing your young son into committing suicide" is YOU. Face facts. Do yourself and your sons a BIG favor and disappear somewhere, never to be seen or heard from again. The Antarctic would be nice - I hear it warms up somewhat this time of year. Or how about Iceland? There's a volcano up there behaving just like you do. Tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock...

I don't have a drinking problem or anything wrong with my liver. It's called - malicious slander. Are you working for Donna Clarkson? Perhaps an investigator could find that out for certain. I am not immoral because Lana Clarkson shot herself at Phil Spector's. Sorry. You yourself have said that all five major experts would not lie on the witness stand. Your Blog doesn't really seem to favor Phil Spector.

I don't have an alcohol-sloshed brain but I am wondering if you are on drugs. If [redacted] thinks I'm drinking that's because his father's a pathological liar who likes to destroy his children. His lawyer is also a pathological liar who probably should start thinking about "Robert Kory's" declaration in [redacted] custody matter. "God," does deranged Kelly Green hate to think what my brain is like? Then why is she/he/it so obsessed with me? Is it Alan Jackson? Donna Clarkson? Michelle Blaine? - all rolled into one. I thought Scott Rabb's article nailed Blaine nicely. Was she projectile vomiting also?

This is malicious slander. Unfortunately, for your deranged posters and yourself it's also a bald-faced lie. I can't wait to meet the judge in the matter that will involve you. If he/she is impressed, I will ask them to recuse themselves and seek immediate psychiatric attention. Quote me. I don't worship at the church of the injustice system where people lie and prevail and get paid to destroy people's lives. The State Bar crowd apparently worships there.

Kelley Lynch

Dear Kelley:

We refer you to our legal analysis of blog owner immunity for the comments authored and posted by third parties:

We are not responsible for any content published on this blog not authored by Blogonaut.

In addition, the Clarkson family is represented by upper tier personal injury lawyers in Los Angeles and NOT anyone affiliated with this blog.

Finally, you can hardly blame people like kellygreen or Sydney for following your internet histrionics closely; when you write the IRS asking that someone be investigated, prosecuted and incarcerated that is a vicious act that tends to leave a lasting impression in the minds of people of ordinary sensibility. We do NOT endorse their content, however. We have our own opinions, as to you.

No, the Karmapa Controversy does not relate to a "national security issue with India". Rather, it refers to the controversy surrounding the recognition of the Seventeenth Karmapa, the head of the Karma Kagyu sect of Tibetan Buddhism.

Shamar Rinpoche a/k/a The 14th Sharmapa, along with a MINORITY of monasteries and lamas, has not accepted Urgyen Trinley as Karmapa.

That is (we think) what you alluded to when you wrote to Shamar Rinpoche (copy to the IRS and the national media of course) and said “hopefully Blogonaut will not weigh in on the Karmapa controversy.”—thus raising the issue with us in the first instance.

Perhaps our very own 14th Sheepdog will have something to say about this later.

In the meantime, Shamar Rinpoche has you to thank for raising both the Karmapa controversy and the Mick Brown tiff with this blog.

We did not say that the Boies Schiller law firm tried to coerce Kelley Lynch into a settlement with Leonard Cohen, and that Boies Schiller used her (even to the point of one of their partners professing love for her and saying he wanted to marry her) SHE DID:

“Boies Schiller began searching for law firms to represent me and ultimately sent me to Zia Modabber and James Mercer – who, in turn, sent me to Bert Deixler and Terry Bird. A conflict check was apparently run by the Pillsbury Firm and I was told by Norman Posel of Boies Schiller that John Cove, managing partner for Boies Schiller in Oakland, personally made these recommendations. It is my belief that BOIES SCHILLER SENT ME TO THESE LAW FIRMS IN AN ATTEMPT TO COERCE ME INTO MAKING AN ILLEGAL DEAL WITH COHEN – which would have ultimately benefited their client, Neal Greenberg, the Agile Group, etc. NORMAN POSEL, A STUDENT OF HIS HOLINESS KUSUM LINGPA, WAS ASKED – BY HIS HOLINESS – TO PROTECT ME. INSTEAD, POSEL USED ME TO ASSIST HIS CLIENT – GOING SO FAR AS TO PRETEND HE WAS IN LOVE WITH ME AND WANTED TO MARRY ME. I fedex'd three boxes of documents to Boies Schiller for review. Some of those documents ended up being used in legal documents filed by the Agile Group – including a transcript of my conversation with Agent Bill Betzer of the IRS. I FOUND THIS UNCONSCIONABLE AS GREENBERG, POSEL, AND OTHERS, HAD USED ME TO PROTECT THEMSELVES AND THEN ATTEMPTED TO BLAME ME FOR THEIR ACTIONS OR THE ACTIONS OF OTHERS. In the latest round of legal insanity, Greenberg, Posel, and others, are attempting to take cover behind me and have brought my young son's "custody matter" up as a legal issue. I feel this is an attempt for Greenberg to assume my actual and factual position. Greenberg's lawsuit in Colorado appears, to me, to have been planned out in conjunction with the suit Cohen fraudulently filed against me in Los Angeles. Westin was a defendant in that suit as well but I feel the allegations against him are true.”

The Complaint, at paragraph 3, does allege that a “preliminary analysis” shows that Lynch had siphoned off at least $5,000,000 more than she was entitled to, and that when confronted she admitted that she had taken “millions” because she had “gotten in over her head”.

No forensic accounting was done. The assets were not valued. I never admitted that I had taken anything. Cohen, as always, is not only a thief who has stolen from me, Phil Spector, Marty Machat, Steven Machat, and possibly Bob Johnston, he is also a bald-faced liar who should stick to fiction. I never said I had "gotten in over" my head or anything else. The preliminary analysis is evidence of fraud and my personal management fee is NOT the only thing to be taken into consideration. Furthermore, regardless of where Cohen deposited the various streams of royalty income - I was entitled to a 15% commission. Naturally, the thief is attempting to steal back my hard-earned commissions. He cannot stop himself. He cannot stop lying. He cannot properly compensate people. He evidently cannot stop stealing. And his tax fraud has clearly caught up with him. I have brought it to the attention of a Canadian government Minister as well.

However, fast forward to the DEFINITIVE analysis performed by forensic accountant Kevin L. Prins, as reflected in his declaration filed in support of the default judgment on May 9, 2006, which shows that the amounts that Kelley Lynch paid herself in excess of the 15% management fee to which she was entitled was far in excess of $5,000,000--$7,159,413 to be exact.

As Cohen knows, and this was attached to my Motion to Quash in Boulder, my accountant met with Kevin Prins (who appears to have committed fraud and perjured himself in his declaration) and Prins advised him that he did not have the back-up documentation re. all the entities to do a forensic accounting. This is a ledger and fraudulent. I didn't pay myself in excess of anything and my 15% management fee is NOT the only thing that needs to be addressed. Cohen's lawyer already confirmed for mine that I am entitled to a 15% personal management fee and own 15% of all intellectual property. The $5 million is a bogus amount Cohen requested from the Court. Evidently the balance of that is damages disguised as interest. The prayed for amount was NOT reduced by the amount Richard Westin (who only represented Cohen) paid as part of his settlement in this amount. The entire lawsuit is fraud; the lies are inconceivable; and no one understands who would like like this in legal documents when the IRS is in possession of evidence and all facts point to this - I was used horrendously; I consistently attempted to determine what was going on; Cohen was wrapped in attorney/client privilege with HIS tax lawyer and HIS financial adviser; etc.

This DEFINITIVE ANALYSIS finished SEVEN MONTHS AFTER THE COMPLAINT WAS FILED is based on canceled checks and account statements and proves that Lynch took checks made out to Leonard Cohen and deposited them in her own accounts (personal account and Stranger Management) to the tune of $229,500; transferred funds from accounts in Cohen’s name to the tune of $3,968,899; and transferred funds from Traditional Holdings (a Cohen owned entity) in excess of her agreed $20,000 a year + % to the tune of $2,961,014. Total $7,159,413 EXACTLY AND DEFINITIVELY.

Traditional Holdings was not Cohen's entity. The corporate books and records prove that. Blue Mist Touring was not Cohen's entity. The corporate books and records prove that. The agreed amount, per TH, was $20,000 per month and $20,000 per year. See management agreement prepared by Cohen's tax lawyer - for his sole benefit. There were other distributions as well - per the corporate books and records. Cohen should review the Indemnity Agreement he had his lawyer prepare on my behalf. Cohen refuses to repay the millions in loans he took from TH which caused his lawyer and financial adviser to conclude that his level of borrowing from TH was "dangerous" to the structure. Cohen cannot "sneak" two entities into a default judgment that are not parties to a lawsuit. I wasn't served. The proof of service is clearly fraudulent. The judge has no jurisdiction over me either. He now has jurisdiction over THEFT, wrongful conversion, fraud, intentional torts, the illegal altering of my federal tax returns, what I believe is a criminal cover up and obstruction of justice, etc.

The prejudgment interest on these siphoned finds totaled $2,341,345.

I view this as damages disguised as interest - which would be illegal.

I have asked the IRS Commissioner's Staff to undertake the complete forensic accounting. As they, the FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and Phil Spector's attorney Dennis Riordan, just saw - Cohen's lawyers threatened me (again) with arrest over this information and other information I need for my federal tax returns which must be amended for the years 2001-2010. Prins ledger should be slam dunked into the trash can and the proper forensic accounting should include a valuation of all assets; a valuation of all assignments dating back to 1967; etc. Cohen has also stolen Steven Machat's 15% share of intellectual property. He has stolen Phil Spector's master tapes and sold them to Sony. He appears to be on a crime spree that is taking place in broad daylight.

Therefore, Kelley Lynch has won the minor point about the phrase “preliminary analysis” being in the Complaint (we don’t know why the Adobe word search failed to find it), but has lost the argument.

Jihad Gianelli appears to be representing Leonard Cohen.

Which brings us to the question of why—if Cohen established $7,159,413 in actual damages, was the award of actual damages by the trial court limited to $5,000,000 at the time the default judgment was entered on May 9, 2009?

Cohen didn't establish anything. He committed fraud upon the court and his perjury is inconceivable.

The answer is simple and straightforward: When entering a default judgment, the court is limited to the amount of the damages prayed for in the complaint. This is because a complaint that only seeks (for example) $15,000 might not motivate a defendant to appear and defend the case, so from a notice/due process standpoint, it is not fair to enter a default judgment for more.

Well then, I wonder why the court didn't reduce the prayed for damages by the settlement amount Richard Westin paid Leonard Cohen. Being served a lawsuit and being made aware of hearing dates, etc., might have served to motivate me to appear in court - although, as I have said, I do not participate in fraud and will not participate in what I view as a cover up of criminal tax fraud ... that includes "ILLEGAL MEDIATIONS."

In this case the prayer of the Complaint sought $5,000,0000 damages for Kelley Lynch’s siphoning of funds, so the trial court “reduced” the compensatory damages being sought, and which were proved up by the Prins Declaration ($7,159,413 ) to a round $5,000,000—the dollar figure stated in the prayer of the complaint.

In other words, Kelley Lynch benefited from what a layperson would call a “technicality” in the law, limiting the damages awarded by the court in a default hearing to the amount of actual damages requested in the prayer.

I benefited from nothing. I turned down Cohen's offer of 50% community property; etc.

Therefore, we have also answered the question of why, if Cohen was seeking $7,159,413 ($9,500,758 with prejudgment interest) the trial court reduced the default judgment to $5,000,000 ($7,300,000 with prejudgment interest).

Class dismissed.

Hopefully, certain federal agencies can find a way to put this stark raving lunatic who appears to work for Leonard Cohen and may have found a sympathetic ear in Alan Jackson (Phil Spector's prosecutor) in prison.