Red List News – Special Report 7.19.2018

“LAPD advised our on the ground leadership that LAPD could not guarantee the safety of any protesters, and strongly advised that the protest not be held because of the danger. LAPD added that if a riot occurred, and we were attacked, the LAPD officers would withdraw and we would be on our own.

Given the high likelihood of lethal force violence (steel pipes and baseball bats to the head are clearly lethal force), and out of concern for the safety of other peaceful protesters such as the MAGA Girls, our advance team leader, Johnny Itliong, made the decision to cancel the protest.” – Stewart Rhodes

(Los Angeles) – Exercising your 1st Amendment rights is fine with the radical left, as long as your point of view mirrors theirs. If it doesn’t, you may be struck in the face with a bicycle lock, or have a brick tossed at your head in the name of fighting fascism. Recently, California Democrat Maxine Waters proclaimed that she fears “armed protests” from members of the Oath Keepers, a non-partisan group with chapters nationwide. Before the peaceful protest even began, members of Oath Keepers were threatened with physical violence and faced the scenario of facing counter-protesters who were armed with bats and lead pipes. The kicker, the LA Police informed the more peaceful of the two groups, Oath Keepers, that they could not guarantee their protection.

Stewart Rhodes was able to join me after my PM news digest, along with Oath Keepers, Keith Britto and Johnny Itilong, who had boots on the ground in LA earlier today.

3 thoughts on “Red List News – Special Report 7.19.2018”

This is sad. Through violence, the thugs win again with the help of the all courageous LAPD. I only wonder what would happen if a peaceful protestor , who is threatened with bodily harm, were to use any means at their disposal to dispatch the threat? Something must be done to curb this violence and allow peaceful assembly again. All this does is give violence another win!

Our justice system and protective agencies will have to distinguish between “freedom of speech” and open threats to the health and safety of other people. Taunting and threatening cannot be tolerated and still maintain our freedoms. This challenges and undermines the right to self-defense. Does an individual have to suffer physical damage and death before antagonists are legally reined in by police or other officials.

I find it hard to believe that the L.A.P.D . a bunch of ex-military and all oathkeppers would not stand with other oathkeppers. Unless the order came from higher up the food chain.
Someone is really pushing for the civil war and that’s when they’ll straight out come for our guns…martial law!