[typo] Switch To HAML?

On Feb 2, 2007, at 12:55 PM, mathew wrote:
> I agree. I think HAML is a dumb idea, because it means you can't just
> edit your templates in a standard XHTML or XML editor.
Buh? Who edits HTML in an XML editor? Especially since the eRB
escapes aren't, to my knowledge, real XML escapes and so I should be
able to construct a valid RHTML file which isn't valid XML.
> If typo moves to HAML, I drop typo, unless there's an HTML-to-HAML
> converter. I don't want to learn another markup language unless
> there's a really, really compelling reason. Making templates take up
> less characters is not that reason.
Why would you have to learn HAML? If we push out a stable Typo that
uses HAML, we'll make sure themes can still use rhtml, so there
should be no problem here.
--
Kevin Ballard
http://kevin.sb.orgkevin at sb.orghttp://www.tildesoft.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/typo-list/attachments/20070211/b6c3db3c/attachment.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2432 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/typo-list/attachments/20070211/b6c3db3c/attachment.bin