NWO is responsible for concert pitch A-440hz

Off Topic: For all those that think being in Skunkworks is a sure thread killer, this thread ought to show them that it's the material, not so much
which forum it's in that matters.

Multiple pages with 60 replies, 10 flags, and an applause, according to the OPs profile. That's sure not bad for a first thread on these boards.
I've had a lot of my threads tank with a LOT less, no matter what forum they were in. (And this one starting on the holidays was already handicapped
by the fact that a lot of people are off the boards.)

OP, as I said earlier on page one, good thread. Very interesting.

Many of us have looked at the governments use of "sound weapons" being used by the police and the military, and admitted to in the mainstream media.
This may be another instance. I wonder what pitch those "sonic cannons" are set to?

I have not investigated this yet so I do not have an opinion just yet.

[edit on 24-12-2007 by Maya432]

That is very interesting. Do you realize that the behavior of the round object in the last few seconds of that video is very close to what many
witnesses attribute to classic UFOs or "flying saucers"?

Could there be an acoustical element to these reports that we are not aware of? Perhaps a "pitch" that is not heard by the human ear? I mention this
because I have read reports of animals reacting, as if to sound, but not the humans during a UFO sighting.

Originally posted by Maya432
here
my cd is all at 432
you can see what the differences are .
in the song "War in Pieces" the very last guitar solo of the song is played in 440( not the whammy bar at the end but the really fast solo before
it)
while the band is in 432...man can you ever hear and feel the tension
during that solo section........ www.myspace.com...

I have not investigated this yet so I do not have an opinion just yet.

[edit on 24-12-2007 by Maya432]

That is very interesting. Do you realize that the behavior of the round object in the last few seconds of that video is very close to what many
witnesses attribute to classic UFOs or "flying saucers"?

Could there be an acoustical element to these reports that we are not aware of? Perhaps a "pitch" that is not heard by the human ear? I mention this
because I have read reports of animals reacting, as if to sound, but not the humans during a UFO sighting.

take a look at this
remember that it reads right to left.
it is the first verse of the ancient Hebrew version of genesis 1:1
I believe this contains the first sequence of the base equation.
it also seems to suggest a loop at the 6th thorn which may relate
to our re-encarnation process then to be born agin of fire
untill such time as we may progress past the 6th thorn to become
gods ourselvesor ( one with god) or (the singularity).
food for thought.
-Bobby

Well you might have guessed by now I don't buy into the idea of an NWO and what I see is more of an OWD (Old World Disorder) with little hope of
forseeable improvement.

But music outlives any dynasties

I must admit tones did have colours associated with them - particularly in the 60's and 70's

Considering old world technology centuries back without the aid of frequency counters, the frequencies (tones) of the scale would be carried on solely
by aural interpretation plus with a few fairly constant sources of those tones for reference which is how the oboe came to be the reference standard.
I can't put a date on when A actually became A though but suffice to say it was centuries ago and the actual frequency would have been subject to
variation due to individual perception.

The date proposed for standardising the frequency of A probably coincides with the development of gadgets capable of doing such a measurement and the
guys in the white coats & thick glasses who produce that sort of gear were quite possibly tonedeaf anyway and opted for a round number 440Hz. If the
assertion is correct for a true natural A actually being 432Hz they only missed by 1/3 of a semitone so it's still a virtual bullseye but I can't
see any dark undertones (pun

) associated with that.

Me - I just enjoy the music and leave the maths & science out of it (mostly)

If you record bird song you will see that it uses 432 resonation.
the same with bees.
Also the sound of a waterfall or the whistle of the wind...all
in 432 resonance, also the roar of a hurricane or the spinning of the earth.
or a galaxy....all adhere to the 1 cosmic resonance.

432 is within the range of our hearing and even more so in the range of the human voice so its the number we can most relate it to.

mark roden(and the hebrew code) are both implying is that this is the base primmer and sequences for equations that lead to perpetual motion,
zero point energy and every other amazing science that has been hidden from us.
what I wouldn`t give to be a scientist right now..

ok I shouldn`t lay this on you yet but I`ve always been on the excitable
side/impatient...

here is what todays up to date Quantum Phycisists have to say about
waves...
be warned it is lengthy..very scientific and
(if you thought dr deagle was scary both in science knowledge and NWO Knowledge then this is gonna kill ya)
and it will fry your brain trying to read it...lol

but just to show you that .....wow.........like wow.........

all from sound huh?

happy reading......see ya at the funnyfarm....

ps. don`t let the title sway you.(its really got nothin to do with motherships)..-

Originally posted by Maya432
ok I shouldn`t lay this on you yet but I`ve always been on the excitable
side/impatient...

here is what todays up to date Quantum Phycisists have to say about
waves...
be warned it is lengthy..very scientific and
(if you thought dr deagle was scary both in science knowledge and NWO Knowledge then this is gonna kill ya)
and it will fry your brain trying to read it...lol

but just to show you that .....wow.........like wow.........

all from sound huh?

happy reading......see ya at the funnyfarm....

ps. don`t let the title sway you.(its really got nothin to do with motherships)..-

I was thinking about your cat and it was more than likely reacting to the higher frequencies and not 432 because the note/tone was constantly being
rased in pitch and never stopped on 432 or any of its counterparts long enough to see if it caused any type of effect.

only when you would see a perfect shape is when the tone was crossing over the 432 point and its counterparts(this is the basis of the quantum string
theory) .....this is one octave
(162, 1 72.8, 256, 270, 288, 432, 648, 691.2, 720, 862, 1080, 1152,)

half way through the vid it starts getting into some pretty high audible frequencies and that would effect your cat for sure(not sure in which way
though)..

I've studied music most of my life, not just instruments, but also theory as well as recording and sound engineering.

Did you know that many classical bands don't even tune to 440 anymore? But.. wait for it, its not 432 they're tuning to, they're tuning more around
447, since they're looking for that 'brighter' sound. This drift has been happening over time.

main reason A wa sused, to my understanding was that was the base note for the divisions of notes. Now, as any musician known, all notes exept for the
base note are some degree of out of tune with the rest of the scale, since the division itself is imperfect, and no, tuning down to 432 doesn't help.
Ask any guitarist and they will all complain that their g string always sounds slightly out of tune when played open unless they have a compensating
nut on their axe. even when tuned to a perfect g note. It will sound 'off' compared to the rest.

heres teh rub, the tuning itself doesn't matter near as much, and most of what you get effectwise is more psychosomatic than real. your speakers, the
musicians grip on the instrument and even the temperature all affect the pitch being sent out to you.

changing the base number doesn't suddenly make all the calculations work, its just being played flat.

IIRC, 439 was also heavily pushed to be the standard, but they had a hard time reproducing that tone in a lab because it was a prime number (heard in
passing)

i agree with one of the previous posters that digital is killing the music. theres something missing from it and usually its the incidental tones and
frequencies that we cant discernably hear. some of those sub and ultra sonics ar elost. but they were also lost on a lot of vinal recordings as well.

Now, if digital is recorded full spectrum and high definition (very high sampling rates) it can be a work of beauty, as long as you have a sound
system that can faithfully reproduce it, which almost no one does.

btw, bending a note *raises* the pitch, not lowers it.

its a godo theory though, and I'll look ito it more this week, since for all I know, I can always learn more.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.