ALISE 2011 Juried Paper Proposals

Five representatives from four member institutions comprised the juried paper proposals review panel. Abstracts of the papers were subjected to a blind review process in which jurors were assigned five judgments:

1. Relevance to the conference theme.2. Topic quality, a rating judging the research method or creativity in exploring the topic.3. Presentation quality, a rating judging the quality of writing.4. Significance, a rating of the importance of the topic and/or findings.5. Final decision for acceptance.

Of 81 unique abstracts, 39 juried paper proposals were accepted for presentation, resulting in an acceptance rate of approximately 48%.