Forums

DOMA & Prop 8 Topic

Posted by burnsy483 on 7/12/2013 1:28:00 PM (view original):And how could the process of making poor people richer be less complicated than letting people marry the person they love?

If one believes homosexuality is a sin, don't you think that makes SSM pretty ******* complicated to them?

The person that thinks homosexuality is a sin probably also thinks things like porn, strippers, cursing, calling people names, eating certain foods, etc are also sins. We don't ban those things either.

First, he's never answered the question, so he couldn't have been "responding to tec when he said that."

Second, considering the extensive and heated arguments I've had with tec in this very thread, it should be obvious we're not the same person. But it's a nice try on your part to distract from the fact that you and BL are, in fact, the same person. Too bad it didn't work.

First, he's never answered the question, so he couldn't have been "responding to tec when he said that."

Second, considering the extensive and heated arguments I've had with tec in this very thread, it should be obvious we're not the same person. But it's a nice try on your part to distract from the fact that you and BL are, in fact, the same person. Too bad it didn't work.

He was answering the question that tec asked. Try to pay attention.

If it makes you feel better, I'm not gay. But then, I'm not bad_luck, whatever you may think.

No, you haven't. There is this major question you have never answered:

bad_luck, ARE YOU HOMOSEXUAL?

A simple "yes" or "no" will suffice.

I think he was responding to tec when he said that.

wait...are you and tec the same person?

Maybe all three are the same person?

Biz, I have you blocked because I'm limited to dealing with two retards at a time, and mike and tec were here first, but I already answered that. I won't answer again. You're welcome to go through the 300 pages to find my simple yes or no response.

Posted by burnsy483 on 7/12/2013 1:28:00 PM (view original):And how could the process of making poor people richer be less complicated than letting people marry the person they love?

If one believes homosexuality is a sin, don't you think that makes SSM pretty ******* complicated to them?

The person that thinks homosexuality is a sin probably also thinks things like porn, strippers, cursing, calling people names, eating certain foods, etc are also sins. We don't ban those things either.

Posted by burnsy483 on 7/12/2013 1:28:00 PM (view original):And how could the process of making poor people richer be less complicated than letting people marry the person they love?

If one believes homosexuality is a sin, don't you think that makes SSM pretty ******* complicated to them?

The person that thinks homosexuality is a sin probably also thinks things like porn, strippers, cursing, calling people names, eating certain foods, etc are also sins. We don't ban those things either.

So what? That wasn't the ******* question was it?

It's an answer to the question you asked. Do you not understand it?

I think I see why tec kept asking you the same question. It's not because you didn't try to answer, you just don't understand questions.

I'll use smaller words.

For someone who believes being gay is a sin, isn't SSM a pretty difficult concept for them to come to terms with?
(this is not an answer to the question: The person that thinks homosexuality is a sin probably also thinks things like porn, strippers, cursing, calling people names, eating certain foods, etc are also sins.)

Biz, I have you blocked because I'm limited to dealing with two retards at a time, and mike and tec were here first, but I already answered that. I won't answer again. You're welcome to go through the 300 pages to find my simple yes or no response.

No, you never answered it but you're pretending you already did so you can justify continuing to not answer.

Your refusal indicates you likely ARE a homosexual, which makes sense given how stubborn you are in defending SSM. If I'm wrong about that, feel free to tell me.

Posted by burnsy483 on 7/12/2013 1:28:00 PM (view original):And how could the process of making poor people richer be less complicated than letting people marry the person they love?

If one believes homosexuality is a sin, don't you think that makes SSM pretty ******* complicated to them?

The person that thinks homosexuality is a sin probably also thinks things like porn, strippers, cursing, calling people names, eating certain foods, etc are also sins. We don't ban those things either.

So what? That wasn't the ******* question was it?

It's an answer to the question you asked. Do you not understand it?

I think I see why tec kept asking you the same question. It's not because you didn't try to answer, you just don't understand questions.

I'll use smaller words.

For someone who believes being gay is a sin, isn't SSM a pretty difficult concept for them to come to terms with?
(this is not an answer to the question: The person that thinks homosexuality is a sin probably also thinks things like porn, strippers, cursing, calling people names, eating certain foods, etc are also sins.)

I'm sorry you have zero ability to understand something not explicitly spelled out. I guess the answer to my question is yes, you don't understand.

The obvious answer to your question is yes. I'm sure it's difficult for them to come to terms with that. But plenty of sins are legal and they have found a way to come to terms with those. We don't ban things just because some people consider them sins.

Biz, I have you blocked because I'm limited to dealing with two retards at a time, and mike and tec were here first, but I already answered that. I won't answer again. You're welcome to go through the 300 pages to find my simple yes or no response.

No, you never answered it but you're pretending you already did so you can justify continuing to not answer.

Your refusal indicates you likely ARE a homosexual, which makes sense given how stubborn you are in defending SSM. If I'm wrong about that, feel free to tell me.

Biz, I have you blocked because I'm limited to dealing with two retards at a time, and mike and tec were here first, but I already answered that. I won't answer again. You're welcome to go through the 300 pages to find my simple yes or no response.

No, you never answered it but you're pretending you already did so you can justify continuing to not answer.

Your refusal indicates you likely ARE a homosexual, which makes sense given how stubborn you are in defending SSM. If I'm wrong about that, feel free to tell me.

I don't understand. I thought you said I was bad_luck, and I told you I'm not gay. Let's put your famous logical skills to work: