Very Trent day for the Colts. 13 att for 35 yards, 2.7 YPC. Longest rush = 7 yards. And of course the Browns win, on the road, with a 3rd string QB and four 3rd string running backs. Can't even fucking tank correctly.

pod2dawg wrote:Tanking is over Boys, its the 2nd or 3rd best available QB option now.

Tanking might be over, losing however, is not.

You don't get 12 seconds in the pocket vs. good teams.

Script is already written..

We got the Lions next week.

No way in hell he survives that.

Better sign another QB.

Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.

Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

Love child of shawn kemp wrote:Ahmad Bradshaw out for the year so we will really get to see what T Rich can do for Indy now.

2.9 YPC and a cloud of dust

Galley Boys are slop on top of a so-so burger and a bun you coulde get from a Covneninet food mart generic pack. They the Antoine Joubert of burgers; soft, sloppy, oozing grease and cheap sauce and extremely overrated by a biased fan base. Proof that if you throw enough cheap sauce shit on a burger you still can't overcome the lame burger. -JB

Funny to see the comparison to Curtis Enis at the bottom. I've been making that comparison all year. I even put together the stats last week (now updated to include lats night's totals for T-Rich).

After his first two years, Curtis Enis played in 24 total games with 420 carries, 1,413 yards, 3.4 avg, 3 TD's, long run of 29 yards, 51 receptions, 360 yards, 7.1 avg, 2 TD's, long reception of 28 yards.

So far in his career, Richardson has played 22 games with 373 carries, 1,283 yards, 3.4 avg, 13 TD's, long run of 32 yards, 60 receptions, 437 yards, 7.3 avg, 1 TD, long reception of 27 yards

@AdamSchefter: At least 3 teams have contacted Browns about deal for WR Josh Gordon; two have standing offers of a high pick and a player. Browns balking.

What's a high pick? Is that a first rounder?

I don't move him for less than a first.

You're nuts.

Mostly because he's nuts and one bored moment away from a year off.

I get that, and I hope it doesn't come to that. But what the hell are they supposed to do? How long has this team been looking for a WR that is worth a shit? Since Webster Slaughter?

Dude is a legit first round talent and he is NOT easily replaced. Heck, even if you get a first for him and draft a WR you are HOPING that he has somewhat the talent that this kid seems to have and he doesn't turn into another Braylon.

I was on board from the beginning with trading TR because he is replacable. Any RB is, really. But not at WR. We've seen it here for how long now?

You trade players for draft picks because you are hoping to get something better with that pick. What second round WR do you think has a good shot to turn into Gordon?

I know this will sound funny, but we're actually in the position of power here. We HAVE Gordon, they don't, that simple. Gordon's value isn't going to diminish enough in the next 12 months that it will thwart our future efforts to improve if we don't move him now. Even if he were to be had for a 2nd rd pick next season that will not be a significant moment in this teams short term future in trying to be a playoff contender.

Criminals in this town used to believe in things...honor, respect."I heard your dog is sick, so bought you this shovel"

It's a no win situation since without past discretions and the resultant threat of year-long suspension, you don't even trade this guy for a 1st rounder since you'd just have to turn around and use that 1st rounder to get a WR of similar talent.

But he's a head case.

So either you hold onto him and pray he doesn't fuck up (and if/when he does, epic fail for not trading him when you could) or trade him away for way less than his field value (and if/when he lights it up for some other team and doesn't get suspended for 5 years, epic fail for trading him for peanuts).

One thing is for sure - if you trade Gordon, you can move that tank out of hiding and park it right next to Bagley.

Well, I don't think you necessarily DON'T trade him because previous regimes haven't found WRs. There are literally scores of them in the league who are good players. If you use the logic that the Browns have spent a long time looking for talent at the _____ position you could literally drive yourself to the Purple Drank.

I do think he's talented. I also think we're in love with a flawed, talented guy because previous regimes have had their heads up their asses and haven't found us any talented, non-flawed guys.

I say hold onto Gordon. If he dips into the Dank who gives a shit...suspend him for 6 games...get him into inpatient treatment with a training facility attached. Hire Garcia to throw him passes till next year training camp. We dont have anyone to get him the ball now anyway.

I would have taken J. Freeman with the same philosophy...only he could have ended up throwing it to Gordon in rehab and we wouldn't have had to hire Garcia.....just sayin.