This is the tale of two Merlots. Both come from Northstar Winery. Northstar is a Ste. Michelle Wines Estates holding. The winery was founded in the nineties with the sole focus of producing the world’s best Merlot from Washington State fruit. While this goal remains, the winery now also offers a number of winery-only, non-Merlot based wines, such as Syrah and Cabernet Franc. David ‘Merf’ Merfeld serves as Northstar’s winemaker. Merfeld joined Northstar in 2001, working as enologist and assistant winemaker before becoming head winemaker in 2005.

Both wines sampled here are classic examples of Washington Merlot. Additionally, both are quite distinct from each other, displaying the varying styles of Merlot being made in the state. The Columbia Valley offering is an appealing, exceptionally well balanced, polished wine. Northstar makes a staggering ten thousand cases of the Columbia Valley offering, giving this wine an extremely wide reach. The Walla Walla Valley wine, on the other hand, offers a bit more complexity on the nose as well as more intensity and boldness on the palate. Among other sources, fruit for the Walla Walla Valley wine comes from Spring Valley Vineyard, one of the finest producers of Merlot in the state, and Loess Vineyard, an estate vineyard for Leonetti Cellar. While both the Columbia Valley and Walla Walla wines are impeccably made, I would give a very slight edge to Walla Walla offering. It provides a bit more of the boldness of Merlot that is a hallmark of Washington State.

My only qualm with either of these wines – and it is a small one – is that both are just over the line in terms of being labeled a Merlot. The Columbia Valley Merlot comes in at 76% (75% is required for varietal labeling) and the Walla Walla Valley wine comes in at 78%. The balance of the wines are other Bordeaux varieties. Indeed, both could easily be classified as Bordeaux-style blends.

The winery’s website provides a graphic displaying the blends of each wine and discusses the goals of blending. Cabernet Sauvignon is added to ‘soften Washington Merlot with bright cherry and raspberry fruit flavors;’ Petit Verdot ‘adds color and structure;’ and Cabernet Franc ‘brings softness and an olive herbal tone.’ While these blending decisions are no doubt responsible for the grace and complexity of these wines and the results are hard to argue with, it would be interesting to see what these wines would look like pushed a bit higher toward their signature grape. Fun to contemplate while savoring another glass.

Northstar Merlot Walla Walla Valley 2006 $50Rating:*(Excellent) Takes some time to open up but once it does this wine sings. An intriguing, complex nose with spice, tobacco, cocoa, dark fruit, and a light earthiness. Glides along the palate with a bit more fruit intensity than the Columbia Valley offering. Lingers on the finish. A prototype for Washington Merlot in general and Walla Walla Valley Merlot in particular. 78% Merlot (Spring Valley, Anna Marie, and Loess vineyards), 17% Cabernet Sauvignon (Anna Marie and Loess vineyards), 5% Cabernet Franc (Minnick Hills Vineyard). Aged in French oak (56% new). 2,500 cases produced.

4
comments

In other countries, 85% is the minimum to be labeled by varietal. To fall below this floor, c'mon you can say it, tells me their merlot is not strong enough to stand on its own. A cabernet to "soften" merlot?? A red flag just went up on 'truth in advertising.'Mike Januik's merlots are over 95% varietal. Crap, and I have a bottle of Northstar's 2005 CV merlot. It better taste like an effin' merlot. ~WAwineman

WWM, I too was struck by the 'Cab to soften Merlot'. Unusual! My sense is that, more than the Merlot not being able to stand on its own - I'm sure that it can given the excellent sources they are using - the winery is looking to make the best *wine* possible rather than the *purest expression of Merlot* possible. Both legitimate obviously. I'd love to see Northstar go up over 85% personally. Will have to check and see if they do something like this for their wine club. Thanks for the comment.

For the last two decades, I've had the opportunity to taste a lot 100% Washington Merlot and Cab Sauv at every stage of production, from wine that has just completed fermentation to wine that is in the process of being bottled. My experience is that -- all other things being equal -- WA Merlot (emphasis on *WA*) does indeed tend to be "bigger" than WA Cab Sauv (esp. tannin structure). It's one of the aspects of Washington viticulture that makes it unique from California and most other wine regions of the world. Depending on the vintage, there are probably years when Cab does indeed soften the Merlot base of a WA wine. My guess is that Northstar doesn't target a lower percentage of Merlot, but thought in that particular vintage, more Cab was needed to reign in the Merlot. Shame on Northstar for trying to make a better wine while operating within the Federal guidelines! ~ITB

ITB, thanks for the comment. Indeed, Merlot can turn into quite a big wine in Washington State. I've tricked many a friends into guessing a Merlot was a Cabernet in blind tastings. Ironically, some of them when I told them it was Merlot suddenly didn't like it! Like I said, the qualm is a small one. The results on these wines are inarguable.