OSNews: http://www.osnews.com/story/11932/SCO_Ventures_Into_Mobile_Device_Applications
Exploring the Future of Computingen-usCopyright 2001-2015, David Adamsadam+nospam@osnews.comTue, 03 Mar 2015 21:22:20 GMThttp://www.osnews.com/images/osnews.gifOSNews.comhttp://www.osnews.com
Same producthttp://www.osnews.com/thread?33935
http://www.osnews.com/thread?33935This is the same product SCO aquired from Vultus, essentially wrote off as a failed investment in the SEC filings and is now selling again. Oh, it is also something they bought using stock which had an inflated value due to Darl threatening the world.

What type of morons do they expect to buy this or any other product they sell?

Advice to SCO: Break the company up. Abandon te SCO name and any variation of SCO. Change the name of the new divisions. Sell them. Move on.

Advice to employees of SCO over the last year: Don't mention SCO on your resume. I can tell you right now I will make damn certian that you are not hired in the company I work for if I find out you were supporting that company and didn't move on when it was obvious that they were up to no good (1+ years ago).Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:01:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)Commentscurioushttp://www.osnews.com/thread?33970
http://www.osnews.com/thread?33970do they still have product developers? I thought they got into the litigation business.Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:14:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)CommentsAnd now, we'll never knowhttp://www.osnews.com/thread?34013
http://www.osnews.com/thread?34013Thanks to SCO's reputation among the computing community, it will be automatically written off by nearly everyone as terrible, and the world will never know if it was actually a decent product...

Way to go, SCO. Your engineers can now do their jobs but nobody cares!Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:53:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (DigitalAxis)CommentsNo way...http://www.osnews.com/thread?34064
http://www.osnews.com/thread?34064Not as long as McBride is CEO ...Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:35:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)Commentsisn'thttp://www.osnews.com/thread?34073
http://www.osnews.com/thread?34073sco dead yet... shameTue, 20 Sep 2005 17:54:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (present_arms)CommentsSCO Ruleshttp://www.osnews.com/thread?34136
http://www.osnews.com/thread?34136nice product, I especially cant wait until SCO destroys the Linux community when they finally win in court.Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:32:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)CommentsRE: And now, we'll never knowhttp://www.osnews.com/thread?34173
http://www.osnews.com/thread?34173Um SCO doesn't have any more engineer's. At least ones with enoughtime to deal with this. Since this FiaSCO started SCO has fired 25% of their workforce, and that number is increasing every quarter(down to ~160 now). You don't roll out a new product by firing the build team.

This is designed to suck as much money out of SCO as quickly as possible so that SCO will be forced to declare bankruptcy. This is to hide assests and cash from bankruptcy judge. The question is now will they be allowed to due just that?Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:18:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)CommentsRE: And now, we'll never knowhttp://www.osnews.com/thread?34234
http://www.osnews.com/thread?34234Bankruptcy does not mean that the lawsuits will go away. Novell's claims against SCO for unpaid licensing fees do not disappear in bankruptcy. And, yes, the bankruptcy court will investigate any pre-filing money laundering.Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:16:00 GMTdonotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)Comments