18 comments:

FACT#1. The Federal Reserve is a private corporation, owned and controlled mostly by foreign bankers.

FACT#2. How the Federal Reserve banks work (using a 10% reserve requirement).

1. F.R. "creates" $1,000,000 worth of "debt certificates" with no assets behind the creation, just the "OK" of Congress, and distributes it to banks.

2. The bank "Holds" the 10% reserve as operating capital ($100,000) and loans the rest out at 10% interest.

3. The bank pockets $90,000 in interest, and accepts the $900,000 back as a deposit.

4. The bank retains 10% of the $900,000 deposit as a reserve, and loans out the $810,000 at 10% interest.

5. The process is repeated over and over, with "hard" assets pledged as collateral for these "loans". Thus, it starts with "no money" and ends up with houses, cars, land, silver, gold...real assets...and all it took was some ink, some paper, and the cooperation of Congress......... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

FACT#5. The taxes paid by Americans never provide ANY services to our country...all collected income tax money goes DIRECTLY to the F.R. Board (check the back of ANY check sent to the IRS...it is true).

FACT #6. All U.S currency is "Federal Reserve Notes" of debt, owed to the Federal Reserve, and is borrowed into existence. How can you pay the debt when you have to "borrow" the currency to pay the debt, FROM THE GUYS YOU ALREADY OWE? It is like paying off your VISA card using THE SAME VISA CARD...the interest just keeps growing, and no principal is ever paid! It is a ponzi scheme....a scam...and America is the mark!

Thus, the national debt can never be repaid. It is not meant to be repaid. It is meant to bring Americans to ruin without bloodshed. It is the legal takeover of the country, piece-by-piece, and the voluntary enslaving of the sovereign people, who will ULTIMATELY be asked to accept the demise of the Constitution, and their sovereign status under that Constitution, to become "subjects" of the benevolent ruling class.

1862: President Lincoln began the printing of $450,000,000 worth of new bills. These bills were printed in green ink on the reverse side, in order to distinguish them from other bills in circulation, and were called, "Greenbacks." These were printed at no interest to the Federal Government and were used to pay the troops and purchase their supplies. President Lincoln would be the last President to issue debt free United States notes,..........

Interestingly, only a few weeks earlier, in October, Congress finally passed a bill legalizing direct income tax of the people. This was in the form of a bill pushed through by Senator Aldrich, which is now commonly known as the 16th amendment.

The income tax law was fundamental to the Federal Reserve. This is because the Federal Reserve was a system which would run up, essentially, an unlimited Federal debt.

The only way to guarantee the payment of interest on this debt was to directly tax the people, as they had done with the Bank Of England. If the Federal Reserve had to rely on contributions from the States, they would be dealing with bigger entities, who could revolt and refuse to pay the interest on their own money, or at least bring political pressure to bear in order to keep the debt small.

1963: President Kennedy issues dollar bills carrying a red seal, and called United States Note. A lot of people believe he was already printing his own debt free money and that is why he was killed, in much the same way as President Lincoln. However, these United States Notes carrying the red seal were merely a reissue of the Greenbacks introduced by President Lincoln.

What could have been motive though, is that on June 4, President Kennedy signed Executive Order No. 11110 that returned to the United States government the power to issue currency, without going through the Federal Reserve. This order gave the Treasury the power to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury. This meant that for every ounce of silver in the United States Treasury's vault, the government could introduce new debt free money into circulation.

Whether it is Oswald or Lovelady in the doorway is absolutely pivotal in the JFK assassination. The idea of being able to put the accused at the scene of the crime is crucial. Usually in this jurisdiction the arresting officer will go to court and present details of the crime committed to a judge. At the end of the arresting officer's presentaion, he will usually finish with the words ".....I am confident that I can connect the accused to the crime(s)....". If we are unable to put Oswald on the TSBD sixth floor orif we have credible evidence that he was somewhere else at the material time, then there is no case to answer. All other considerations as regards the number of shots, the alleged weapon used, the so-called magic bullet, the alleged brown paper bag and curtain rods, the number of shells - all these and other factors regarding Oswald's guilt are meaningless. Unless we can put Oswald at the scene of the crime at the time the crime was committed,we have nothing.

In short: present credible and irrefutable evidence that Oswald was at the scene of the crime at the material time and let us proceed from there.

It is still on the JFK Education Forum but you need to register to join the forum and I'm not sure they are taking on any new members. Non-members cannot download images. If you know someone who is a member, maybe he/she could download it. Just type in red_shirt_overlay.gif in Google search and it will take you to some JFK Education Forum links to the image for download.

There is "credible and reliable" evidence that Lovelady WAS NOT Doorman! How can any serious student continue to promote such a charade? All the images are good enough to tell that Doorman was around 5'10" and 130 lbs. Billy was 3" shorter and 15-20 lbs heavier. He was wearing a short sleeved, red-and-white, vertically striped shirt, which he even showed the FBI on 29 February 1964. He was standing to the left of Doorman with his hands raised to shield his eyes from the sun. The other figure who has been claimed to be Lovelady is far too robust--bursting out of his shirt and weighing around 30 lbs min more than Doorman, with his shirt buttoned up to the top. Where do the shills come up with this kind rubbish? It is OBVIOUS once you look at the clothing, their builds, heights and weights. There is nothing to dispute. You don't even have to get into his missing left shoulder, that BTM is both in front of and behind him at the same time, and all that--not to mention that a face (which appears to have been that of Bill Shelley) has been obscured--multiple proofs that the Altgens6 was altered.

There is "credible and reliable" evidence that Lovelady WAS NOT Doorman! How can any serious student continue to promote such a charade? All the images are good enough to tell that Doorman was around 5'10" and 130 lbs. Billy was 3" shorter and 15-20 lbs heavier. He was wearing a short sleeved, red-and-white, vertically striped shirt, which he even showed the FBI on 29 February 1964. He was standing to the left of Doorman with his hands raised to shield his eyes from the sun. The other figure who has been claimed to be Lovelady is far too robust--bursting out of his shirt and weighing around 30 lbs min more than Doorman, with his shirt buttoned up to the top. Where do the shills come up with this kind rubbish? It is OBVIOUS once you look at the clothing, their builds, heights and weights. There is nothing to dispute. You don't even have to get into his missing left shoulder, that BTM is both in front of and behind him at the same time, and all that--not to mention that a face (which appears to have been that of Bill Shelley) has been obscured--multiple proofs that the Altgens6 was altered.

Even your own Richard Hooke is not in agreement with the missing shoulder and the insertion of "Black Tie Man", as he has recently explained on the FB page "Lee Harvey Oswald is Innocent"You yourself have labelled the so -called "Obfuscated Man" as a man shielding his eyes from the sun in your article with Larry Rivera "Why Buell Wesley Frazier was erased from Altgens6". The imagined obfuscation is merely the elbow of this figure pointed toward the camera in Altgens 6, and this is confirmed in Weigman. So there is indeed plenty to dispute. And if Doorman's shirt is patterned, as I believe I've demonstrated, then he clearly can't be Oswald.And I should add that I'm still prepared to consider the possibility that Lee was indeed present SOMEWHERE in the doorway - based on other current research of which I'm sure you're aware, and which is far more soundly reasoned than anything presented by the O.I.C.

What is the provenance of your Altgens images, Lance? I remember there was a guy on the JFK Education Forum a few years back who did some interestiing work on theimage as regards the pattern. His name was Bill Miller. I don't know if he's still around. He made some pretty impressive layered animated gif images of the doorman's shirt overlaid with Lovelady's checked shirt. You should contact Bill if he is still researching the JFK assassination. He may still have the animated gifs.You could search the JFK Education Forum - the animated gif images may still be there.

Thanks Charles. I wasn't aware of Bill Miller's research on this and I'm not a member of the Ed forum, but I'll see what I can find out.As to the provenance of the images, I've used the best I can find from internet sources. Robin Unger's gallery is, of course, an excellent resource. I do have a higher resolution scan of the Groden doorway image than is generally available but I've undertaken not to publish work using it for the time being. The source of the images used by the O.I.C is almost always not known.

Lance, review my comment above. Virtually all of the images of the Altgens6 are good enough to substantiate the points I am making. Why not engage the argument and explain what we have wrong? It's not the faces, which have been fudged, but the bodies that matter. These three figures had very different clothing, builds, heights and weights. The only one that fits is Oswald.

Jim, I have to assume that you didn't bother to review the evidence I presented since your comment offers nothing to refute it. Even Richard Hooke is in disagreement with missing shoulders and "behinad and in front" figures, but these points scarcely matter because if Doorman's shirt is patterned ( and I've shown that it is ), he can't be Oswald.