CRITICAL LITERACY

Followers

Friday, November 9, 2012

According to BBC Shakespeare Animated
Tales-Julius Caesar, Brutus supposed to not kill Julius Caesar because it only
makes Romans rebel especially Mark Antony. Brutus should think about the
murdering deeply and do not follow on Cassius advice.

Julius Caesar is the most influence people in
Rome, Brutus should know that. By killing Rome dictator, it only put himself in
trouble. Even though Caesar was not a good person but he still loves Brutus. He
provides the best education for Brutus and Brutus have to think wisely before
make the decision to kill his adopted father.

Brutus should realize without Caesar he is
nothing. By killing Caesar is not a noble motive but it is more to revenge
because the idea derives from Cassius not him. Cassius seems like to hate on
Caesar because he had all the title and respect from Romans even though he is a
bad person.

Caesar is an old man and he would not protect
himself if all the 12 persons attack him. The consequences of the murder also
not been thought by Brutus, because of Cassius words he does not think the
results on his action.

In conclusion, Brutus has no reason to kill his
adopted father because Caesar is an old man. Brutus actually did not respect
him as a father although Caesar had killed thousands of people but he still
cares on Brutus.

Due to the documentary, Caesar is a psychopath.
He has no mercy towards children and women. He is a bisexual and enjoys his sex
life with aristocrats’ wives and believes he can dominate all people around him.
He is actually was a great dictator, he manage to guide Rome in a supreme place
before century. He knows how to handle the politics and armies.

At the first, when he is a captive to the pirates,
he shows his credibility by promising to kill the pirates soon after the ransom;
he fulfilled the promises and crucifies all of them. This is ridiculous because
he did this to others who are innocent. He loves revenge and he loves to
torture people he also did not care on others feeling. However it is good to
maintain the peaceful of Rome. But sadly, it only makes him feel like he is the
perfect dictator.

But then, he became more powerful after he is
appointed as governor even though he is in big debt. To solve the issue, he tries
to conquer the unconquered Gaul. He also using hi-technology weapon which is a
designed arrow with space for them to put in something such as ball of fire to
defeat the enemy. This is good because he wanted to defend the Rome Empire.
However he is over the boundaries where he does not allowed women, children,
old citizens’ fugitive to enter the Rome because Rome is only for Romans.

The desperation of war fugitives do not make him
changed his mind. He shows the anger by let them die in starvation. He has no
humanity. Therefore, his action is not necessary in order to safeguard the
superiority of Rome. He enjoys himself by seen them being tortured.

Sunday, September 30, 2012

There were many suspects in the JTR murders over
the years. What are the evidences that support the claim that James Kelly was
JTR? If you are a rival detective, how do you eliminate all the evidence that
you've identified in the documentary?

Jack the Ripper was mainly known in London. After
a few years, he pops up in New York, America and killed another whore. It is
true the vicious evidence was made by him? Based from the information that been
stated in the documentary. An
investigator Ed Norris, open up the cold case file after a century. He wanted
to solve all the cases and he believes there’s someone who can be a prime suspect.
He suspected James Kelly.

*************************************

The first victim of Jack the Ripper in America
was Carrie Brown 56 year old prostitute. She was killed with the same method as
London Jack the Ripper. Because of that, the authorities assume the evidence is
made by him. There are three major suspects, but, from time to time, Ed Noris eliminate
the other two suspects; Seweryn Klosowski and Francis Tumblety.

**********************************

The rival detective will disagree on this
statement. It can be argued because how furnisher upholster can remove all the
organs and mutilate all his victims. A person without any knowledge of human
anatomy cannot cut a body very fine just like Jack the Ripper done on his prey.
Next, James Kelly only cut his wife throat but he does not cut his wife organs.
Basically, the London serial killer took some part of the organ, so that,
someone cannot simply accuse James Kelly is the serial killer. Another thing,
other man can easily imitate Jack the Ripper style of killing to fright people
in America.

************************************

The documentary also makes the viewer believe a London
serial killer is James Kelly. But, he never had been prosecuted because the
truth is not there. The documentary only makes an assumption but not a fact.

Distinguish between facts and fictions that are
portrayed in the movie @ Which aspect of the plot that is accurate to the
historical fact in the JTR murders and which aspect of the plot that is based
on the filmmakers' own imagination.

After
spending two hours to examine ‘From Hell’ I can conclude the murderer was a
notoriousin that era. In 1888, there is a person who likes to kill a
prostitute in Whitechapel known as ‘Jack the Ripper’. He kills and mutilates his
victims meanly. The news of it is extremely disseminated around London; many of
Londoners assume the killer is a Jewish because they do not like them
manipulate the economy in that time.

2@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

According
on the film, the names of victims are accurate; the filmmakers did not
exaggerate on it. The condition of the victims dies also followed the facts. Next,
thechronology of the victimskilled also the same with the fact given.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

Jack the Ripper is a surgeon. Before inspector Abberline; an
investigator in charged, found the exactly killer, he named several of suspect.
One of the suspect names is Benjamin Kidney but his name does not even stated
in the book. Then, the second lady (Annie Chapman) was killed at Hanover Street
but she had been killed at Hanbury Street according to the fact. For the last
case, in the film, the heart of the victim is taken out and the killer put it
in the kettle. Meanwhile, the fact is the victim heart is gone. Furthermore, in
film, inspector Abberline is a heavily opium addict. Lastly, Marry Jean Kelly
was not murdered in the film instead, the one who killed is her friend named
Ada a girl from France. In the text, it does not happen.

Sunday, September 9, 2012

State several evidence which support the ancient astronaut
theory. Discuss whether you agree or disagree to the evidence that you have
identified.

Based on the documentary, millions of people trust that we
have been visited by alien in the past, due to the artefact that had been inheritance
to us. For example, French archaeology found a small wooden like a bird artefact
in the oldest burial ground at Sakkara, Egypt. Second, in a dense jungle lives Colombian
civilisation known as a Tolima, restrain an archaeology artefact just like a modern
jet. Next, spaceship called ‘Rukma Vimana’ found in Indian subcontinent ancient.
Vimana’s is like a space ship using a jet engine or using spinning bright light
called gyroscope in modern to find its velocity. Other evidence is a flying
machine in utopian civilization. In book of ‘Eziekel’, there is a spaceship
called Eziekel spaceship exist and supported by Joseph Bloomerg from NASA.

##############################################

By study the documentary, I dispute to the evidence. It is
because if ancient truly invented a space craft or space ship, it must be prove
on each artefact, for instance, a piece of it. People in ancient has a huge of
fantasy, they can imagine so many things. They also believe in magic, by using
their imagination and spell, they easily create a new thing. Everything that
has been made by them is coincidence to a modern life. There is a fact, if we look
at the moon and we want to see smiling face, it will appear because our brain interpreted
on what we wanted to see. So, I strongly agree that ancient ancestor had has
invented a flying transportation and has been visited by an alien.