Pages

Thursday, August 16, 2018

Last week, Express Scripts released the 2019 updates to its formulary exclusion lists. They are available below for your downloading pleasure. Unfortunately, CVS Health won’t release its list until October.

For 2019, Express Scripts was more aggressive than ever, expanding its list to more than 240 excluded products. For the first time, it excluded products in two specialty categories: HIV antiretrovirals and Factor VIII recombinant products. It also added a new exclusion in multiple sclerosis.

Oddly, Express Scripts has made a patient unfriendly change to the hepatitis C category. It has excluded AbbVie’s Mavyret, the market share leader with a low list price. Instead, it added Merck’s Zepatier, whose list price was recently cut but can’t treat all types of hepatitis C. Consequently, the 2019 preferred formulary will force at least one in four patients to use the products with high list prices and high rebates. Many patients will end up incurring much higher out-of-pocket costs. Incredibly, Express Scripts advocates copay cards as a fix!

To me, the hepatitis C formulary change are further evidence of the warped incentives of our gross-to-net bubble. Payers benefit from a low net price, and PBMs gain from high list prices with high rebates (though less than we once thought). Meanwhile, patients get stuck making out-of-pocket payments based on the higher list price. Is this any way to run a drug channel?RUMBLE IN THE BRONX

Formulary exclusions block access to specific products. They emerged as a powerful tool for PBMs to gain additional negotiating leverage against manufacturers. PBMs force manufacturers of therapeutically comparable brand-name drugs to offer bigger rebates to avoid being cut from the formulary. The exclusions are a crucial factor behind the growing gross-to-net disparities for manufacturers of brand-name drugs. See Payer Power: Why Eli Lilly, Janssen, and Merck Deeply Discount Their Drug Prices.

Formulary restrictions affect a PBM’s recommended national formulary. These restrictions are suggestions, not mandates. Thus, a drug’s appearance on an exclusion list does not guarantee that all patients will lose access. However, plan sponsors—the PBM's clients—that do not adopt the standard formulary could face reduced rebates and/or higher plan costs.

The chart below shows the number of drugs that have been excluded from the national preferred formularies of the two largest PBMs.

[Click to Enlarge]

Express Scripts expanded its list to include 242 products for 2019. Its 2018 list initially had 159 products, then grew to 196 products with mid-year additions. For 2019, Express Scripts excluded a further 48 products and added back 2 products (Trulance and Zepatier).

Express also noted that drug coverage for only 0.2% of its beneficiaries will change. That’s down from the 0.78% of its beneficiaries who were affected by its initial 2018 exclusions.

Though CVS didn’t release its 2019 exclusion list, it did announce that it plans to remove 23 drugs from—and add back four drugs to—its 2019 Standard Control Formulary.

2. Express Scripts made exclusions in key specialty categories.

The PBMs have historically been reluctant to clamp down on crucial specialty drug categories. But for 2019, Express Scripts got slightly more aggressive with its exclusions in three specialty categories:

Multiple sclerosis (MS): Express Scripts excluded Extavia, marking only the second time that it excluded a product from this category. (ESI had excluded Betaseron for 2014, but added it back in 2016.) Included products for 2019 will be Avonex, Betaseron, Plegridy, Rebif, and Rebif Rebidose.

Last year, CVS reversed two exclusions in the MS category: Avonex and Plegridy. Extavia is the only MS drug that is excluded from CVS Health’s current Standard Control Formulary.

HIV antiretrovirals: Express Scripts excluded Atripla, its first exclusion in the category. Included products will be Biktarvy, Genvoya, Odefsey, Stribild, Symfi, Symfi Lo, and Triumeq.

3. Express Scripts made a patient unfriendly change to the hepatitis C category.

Express Scripts made a major change to the hepatitis C category. It excluded AbbVie’s Mavyret product and added Merck’s Zepatier product back to its preferred formulary. The other preferred alternatives in this category are Epclusa, Harvoni, and Vosevi.

I’m not qualified to comment on the clinical reasoning behind this move. However, the list price dynamics are intriguing, and the patient impact is troubling.

There are six genetically distinct groups of the virus. About 75% of patients infected with HCV have genotype 1 (subtypes 1a or 1b), 20% to 25% have genotypes 2 or 3, and a small percentage of patients have genotypes 4, 5, or 6.

Drug treatment depends on the patient’s genotype. Two popular therapies—Mavyret and Epclusa—can be used with all six genotypes. Harvoni can be used only with genotypes 1, 4, 5, and 6. Zepatier, the product added to the Express Scripts formulary, can be used only with genotypes 1 and 4. (CORRECTED)

Until recently, Mavyret had the lowest list price. AbbVie launched Mavyret in 2017 with a wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) list price for a one-month supply that was more than 50% lower than the list price of other therapies.

These drugs are not inexpensive. According to Pharmaceutical Technology: “The list prices for eight-week and 12-week courses of Mavyret are $26,400 and $39,600, respectively—far below the 12-week list prices for Harvoni ($94,500) and Epclusa ($74,760).” Rebates can be substantial, so the list prices do not meaningfully reflect the net cost to a payer.

Mavyret has rapidly gained share. The chart below shows the prescription market share for HCV products in 2018 to date. As you can see, Express Scripts has excluded the product with the largest market share (Mavyret) along with three products that collectively accounted for 0.4% of prescriptions. The preferred alternatives rank as the second through fifth most-dispensed therapies.

[Click to Enlarge]

Mavyret’s position as the HCV drug with the lowest list price was disrupted last month when Merck cut Zepatier’s list price by 60% last month. Merck recorded no net sales (after rebates) from the product in the first quarter of 2018. See The New York Times coverage in Merck Is Lowering Drug Prices. There’s a Catch.

Now consider Express Scripts’ 2019 formulary changes.

Express Scripts has excluded Mavyret, the lowest list price product that can treat the one in four patients who has HCV genotype 2 and 3. These patients can’t take Zepatier, which treats only genotypes 1 and 4. They will therefore most likely be treated with Harvoni, a product with a higher list price and presumably high rebates.

At least some patients will suffer from this formulary approach. Patients with commercial insurance often have prescription drug deductibles and coinsurance, so their out-of-pocket costs are linked to undiscounted, pre-rebate list prices. Patients with HCV genotypes 2, 3, 5, and 6 will face higher costs due to these formulary exclusions. They won’t benefit from a low net price.

If physicians end up prescribing Harvoni or Epclusa over Zepatier, then patients with genotypes 1 and 4 will also get stuck with higher out-of-pocket costs tied to the higher list prices.

I asked Express Scripts about the HCV patients that will face higher out-of-pocket costs due to the exclusion of the market share leader with a low list price. Its spokesperson told me:

"[W]e would prefer to see drug makers lower list prices instead of funding copay card programs as that would make the medications more affordable for all patients and payers. But until they choose to do so, then the copay card would be an option."

Huh? Express Scripts is now encouraging patients to use manufacturer copay cards as a way to overcome its own formulary recommendation?

Of course, commercial plans could fix this mess by passing through the hepatitis C rebates to patients at the point of sale. Most plans don’t do that now, and I don’t expect them to do it voluntarily in 2019. As I noted in Tuesday’s analysis of PBM rebates, plan sponsors prefer to hoard rebates rather than sharing the savings with the employees whose prescriptions generated the rebate funds.

P.S. The original version of this article misstated the genotypes for which Harvoni can be used. Per the ALF site linked above, Harvoni can be used with genotypes 1, 4, 5, and 6. We apologize for the error.

DISCLAIMERThe analyses on this website are based on information and data that are in the public domain. Any conclusions, findings, opinions, or recommendations are based on our own experienced and professional judgment and interpretations given the information available. While all information is believed to be reliable at the time of writing, the information provided here is for reference use only and does not constitute the rendering of legal, financial, commercial, or other professional advice by Pembroke Consulting, Inc., Drug Channels Institute, or the author. Any reliance upon the information is at your own risk, and Pembroke Consulting, Inc., Drug Channels Institute, and the author shall not be responsible for any liability arising from or related to the use or accuracy of the information in any way. Pembroke Consulting, Inc., and Drug Channels Institute do not make investment recommendations, on this website or otherwise. Nothing on this website should be interpreted as an opinion by Pembroke Consulting, Inc., Drug Channels Institute, or the author on the investment prospects of specific companies.

The comments contained on this site come from members of the public and do not necessarily reflect the views of Drug Channels Institute or the author. Neither Drug Channels Institute nor the author endorse or approve of their content. Drug Channels Institute and the author reserve the right to remove or block comments, but are under no obligation to explain individual moderation decisions.

The public domain use of our materials includes linking to our website. You do not need to obtain special permission to link to the Drug Channels site. The material on this site is protected by copyright law. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this material may result in severe civil and criminal penalties and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent of the law. This report may be cited in commercial documents with full and appropriate attribution. We do not intend to reduce, limit, or restrict any rights arising from fair use under copyright law or other applicable laws. We do not permit our articles to be republished without prior written permission.

The content of Sponsored Posts does not necessarily reflect the views of Pembroke Consulting, Inc., Drug Channels Institute, or any of its employees.