Ever since Mitt Romney lost the presidential election, there's been a lot of talk about how the Republican Party needs to "rebrand" itself.

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal wants, among other things, for the GOP to stop being "the stupid party." Rep. Paul Ryan has concluded that the watchword for the Republican Party needs to be "prudence." Sen. Marco Rubio is the front man for the most tangible aspect of the rebranding effort: getting on the right side of the immigration issue. In the process, he's become something of the de facto point person for the party.

The latest entrant into this effort: House Majority leader Eric Cantor. On Tuesday, Cantor gave a well-received speech at the American Enterprise Institute (where I am a fellow), titled "Making Life Work." In it, Cantor argued for utterly reasonable conservative solutions that would improve the plight of the working poor and the middle class.

It's all good stuff from a great field. Indeed, while calling them the "fantastic four" might seem hyperbolic -- and unfair to a few other politicians left out of the mix -- Rubio, Ryan, Jindal and Cantor are a pretty good counterargument to those who think the Republican Party is doomed. Excellent politicians all, three out of four are minorities: a Hispanic, an Indian-American, and a Jew -- which sounds like they should be walking into a bar for a joke. The fourth, the Catholic Ryan, routinely wins a working-class district that votes Democratic in presidential elections.

I should note that lately I've written favorably about this rebranding stuff as well. In a nutshell, I've been arguing that the GOP's problems don't stem from a lack of principle, but from a lack of persuasiveness.

My point was not -- and is not -- that the GOP should abandon its commitment to core conservative principles. If you can't get the swing voters to vote for the existing level of conservatism the GOP is offering, it seems odd to argue that the GOP needs to peddle an even more strident form of conservatism (even if that purer conservatism would yield better policies). If a potential customer says, "The Chevy Impala is too pricey," a good salesman doesn't immediately respond, "OK, can I interest you in a Bentley?"

All that said, I think the push to rebrand the GOP has its own pitfalls.

For starters, "prudence" and "don't be stupid," while excellent prescriptions for how to behave, are not, in themselves, great rallying cries. If you don't believe me, try to get a crowd of the faithful to start chanting "Pru-dence! Pru-dence!" or "We're Not Stupid! We're Not Stupid!"

While this may seem obvious, the fact is that one GOP's worst tics is its habit of reading its stage directions out loud. For instance, Republicans often talk about how they're not going to "go negative." George H.W. Bush had such contempt for Bill Clinton's gift for wholesale empathy, he felt the need to proclaim, "Message: I care."

Obviously, Republicans should care about what is best for the country and the voters -- and they should demonstrate that concern -- but they will never beat liberals at the game of whose heart bleeds the most. As liberal Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne observes, Cantor's rebranding maneuvers the GOP into a contest on Democratic turf: who cares more about workers, the poor, immigrants, etc. As Dionne notes, that's why Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer immediately praised Cantor's remarks.

The reason that game is so perilous for conservatives is not that liberals necessarily care more than conservatives but that they are always willing and eager to prove their concern by cutting a check, even when all we have in the checking account is IOUs and cash on loan from China. Moreover, they are perfectly happy and eager to say that anyone who opposes more check-kiting is greedy or selfish, even if what Democrats are doing is making the problem they seek to solve worse. All too often, liberals act as if government has a monopoly on compassion.

"There is always a certain meanness in the argument of conservatism," Ralph Waldo Emerson famously said, "joined with a certain superiority in its fact." Children often think their parents are being mean when they tell their kids to do their homework. That doesn't make the parents mean, it makes them responsible. Eventually, the lessons of life persuade children their parents were right all along.

Voters aren't children, but too many of them have the childish notion that the best policies are those that pander to their immediate desires. The challenge for the GOP is to persuade them to put away childish things.

Liberals have demonstrated that candidates for the Presidency need not be experienced, credible or educated. Candidates need not be either personally or professionally irreproachable and if the nominee is not incorruptible...oh well... what do you want...character or something old fashioned like that?

Why do Conservatives insist on fielding ‘Ozzie and Harriet’ candidates with NO relevance to the current American lifestyle or the mind-set of the Conservative base.

Conservatism (especially within the Tea Party-it’s MOST definitive expression) is more coherent, articulate and consistent than the GOP has been for a long time. Meanwhile, the GOP has its heels dug in on issues the true Conservatives have long since clarified for the record!

True Conservatives regard the GOP as a moribund relic and it's disconnect is more apparent all the time.

9
posted on 02/08/2013 7:55:40 AM PST
by SMARTY
("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)

(Article) All that said, I think the push to rebrand the GOP has its own pitfalls. Yeah, dumping any semblance of commitment to constitutional government to chase a 51% corrupted and lobotomized electorate sounds like smart strategy to me.

Yes, the death panels and make them eat their own anti-constitutional words and activities. For one - demanding an end to the freedom of speech in the name of not offending Islam, which is called Sharia in foreign nations; and the other, demanding an end to the second amendment’s guarentee of self defense. They want America’s constitutional submission to Islam and to criminals.

[Goldberg] If you can't get the swing voters to vote for the existing level of conservatism the GOP is offering, it seems odd to argue that the GOP needs to peddle an even more strident form of conservatism ..... That's pure RiNO-Romneyism. Jonah, are your hemorrhoids tickling you, or is that Karl Rove's arm up your @ss?

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.