<quoted text>Che, I've been dealing with Reader for three years. Same old BS, and she is well aware of my stand on the issues.When you learn how things work between longtime posters in Columbus, maybe your light bulb will illuminate.The fact that you associate with crackheads comes as no surprise. Are you a buyer or a seller?

Hear Ye, Hear Ye, Hear Ye'all.

His royal Highness, the Prince of pablum, King of Columbus topix hath spoken.

<quoted text>You make your points perfectly clear to yourself and other teabaggers. When pressed, you can't defend anything you say. I've seen crackheads do a better job of sticking to a story than you do.

<quoted text>It's called not playing your childish games, Reader. You, like Che, weasel around and try to bait people into a "gotcha" post. I've made my position perfectly clear to those with the ability to think without the fog of leftist hate obscuring their faculties.Try somewhere else.

Funny--it looks to me like being unwilling to accept personal responsibility for your views.

<quoted text>Well, George, there's always the hope that you'll grow up.You make some pretty bold statements about blacks and then claim that you harbor no biases--that you are simply dealing in the facts.The reality is that you go far beyond the facts to reach conclusions NOT supported.And when someone comes close to catching you with your hand in the cookie jar you start calling names, or claim to the be the victim of Catholic-bashing or hatred against your white manhood.Yes--you have been consistent for three years.But consistency doesn't make your right, or your beliefs any more just, sensible or attractive.

52%72%Tell me how those stats from your beloved federal government aren't linked to supportable conclusions.

<quoted text>Well, George, there's always the hope that you'll grow up.You make some pretty bold statements about blacks and then claim that you harbor no biases--that you are simply dealing in the facts.The reality is that you go far beyond the facts to reach conclusions NOT supported.And when someone comes close to catching you with your hand in the cookie jar you start calling names, or claim to the be the victim of Catholic-bashing or hatred against your white manhood.Yes--you have been consistent for three years.But consistency doesn't make your right, or your beliefs any more just, sensible or attractive.

You can't make an argument without calling us racist.

And you still can't dig up evidence from either of us where we have accused there of being a genetic superiority of whites or inferiority of blacks.

"White privilege" and "Institutional Racism" are your bread and butter, and all the excuses for minorities to blame whitey and the eeevil Republicans for their struggles.

<quoted text>You can't make an argument without calling us racist.And you still can't dig up evidence from either of us where we have accused there of being a genetic superiority of whites or inferiority of blacks."White privilege" and "Institutional Racism" are your bread and butter, and all the excuses for minorities to blame whitey and the eeevil Republicans for their struggles.

Remember...Reader campaigned for Jesse Jackson and voted for Barack Obama twice."'nuff said," as she likes to say.

<quoted text>Semi-automatics are a part of a larger problem--particularly relate to mass killings.Easy access to guns of all kinds (the sort of thing that universal background checks and weapon-tracing are likely to combat) cannot solve all of the issues leading to this, or a good many other deaths of young black men and kids.But, it the guns were not there, perhaps they would, as George recently suggested, live to fight another day.

politics aside

have you ever heard of the Spartans?

300 Greeks held off over 1 million Persians; and killed an estimated 100,000 in 3 days.

Swords and bows.

If you do the math, that is 100 kills per Spartan per day. The true number is those alive on day 3 had much higher ratio.

my point being, killing has never been a problem.

limiting magazine capacity will limit crime about as much as the drinking age keeps under age from drinking.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.