Like this:

Related

Post navigation

57 thoughts on “Former Tory MP claims she can tell someone’s religion by the way they tweet”

Reblogged this on Beastrabban’s Weblog and commented:
Louise Mensch once again puts her foot in it by claiming that she can tell if someone’s a Muslim or not by the way they tweet. It’s possible that she may not be quite responsible for her actions, though. After Private Eye published a few articles covering some of her bizarre antics a few years ago, they received a letter from someone who had worked with her in a music shop. She was known amongst the rest of the staff for writing mediocre poetry, and for her evangelical enthusiasm for certain chemical forms of recreation. Possibly too much exposure to the drug culture has resulted in long-term neurological damage. Who can say?

Furious – In a metaphorical sense all Westminster MPs have to do that, both before and after being elected. If they want a political career then they have to get down on their knees and suck whatever the whips tell them to.

There’s Louis Theroux another sarcastic homosexual on tv, talking down to the black community that have been jailed in USA for trying to fight the oppressive laws against their culture. He is dead brave stood there in a cell throwing questions at a handcuffed prisoner with a warder in attendance.
Time we got rid of these free loading wankers off the TV instead of paying for free holiday destinations for them to travel to throughout the world.

Why do you ask me a question then answer it yourself or create another alter ego to support your cause – I know because you have all the answers don’t you Mr chip on the shoulder moron.
He also takes the piss out of swingers and other freaks such as yourself.

You think I’ve created ANOTHER alter ego? How many do you think I’ve got now? You’ve mentioned Tom Pride and Devil’s Advocate before. Are there some others?… maybe on different web sites such as Johnny Void’s?

Some people accept with good grace when they make a mistake, and some don’t.

If he is married then he must be bisexual then, because he has definitely got gay written all over him.
As for your alter ego’s where has Devil gone, I know you have merged into one yet again.
I think you are the one that admits to nothing especially when I have proved you wrong so many times and I’m not talking about your spelling.

ps according to you and tom pride there is no difference between a homosexual and a bisexual, so why are you objecting? I will tell you why because you know there bloody well is.
I’m doing a fink answering my own questions.

As you know this blog is a free speech zone. What you see as ‘turning a blind eye’ I see as ‘freedom of expression’.
That said – I personally think calling gay men ‘predatory’ shows intolerance and prejudice. And calling for bisexuality to be made illegal – but not homosexuality – is a bit weird TBH.
And Guy – no I’m not FinkFurst. Do me a favour!

FinkFurst said:

February 27, 2014 at 10:31 am

Tom – That’s fair comment, up to a point. Your opinion in only one of many on here, but it’s arguably the most important, and how and when you choose to express it has an effect. If your blog is intended to have some effect on society, which I presume is its primary function, then your opinion makes a difference.

Tom was trying to imply that bi and homsexuality are the same and you agreed – HAPPY.
Perhaps you would like spelling mistakes or typing so fast you override the capitals button a capital offence, warranting nothing less than hanging?

PS I would not be calling for one and not the other to be criminalized if there was not a difference(as you admitted) and different reasons for my citing one not the other, but Tom chose to insult me, to please you his alter ego, by calling me weird to want to separate the two – how weird is that?
There were no other comments other than ours either on this subject despite your impassioned plea and threats,
You sound like a bloody psychopath to me!

You and devil were the same person, it must have proved too difficult keeping so many balls in the air that is why he has mysteriously disappeared. Perhaps you would like to bring him back to prove me wrong.

In answer to your first question “so you think I’m not Irena?” anything is possible, she does look like a man.
Will the real Tom pride stand up!

In answer to your statement “Your grasp of logic is astonishing”, how is it illogical for you to prove me wrong by once again keeping your multiple balls in the air?”
Mind you it is pretty illogical to try and prove me wrong I will grant you that because your success so far is diabolical.

Oh deary deary me! You really have a hard time keeping up, don’t you? If I could bring Devil’s Advocate back it then would prove you right, not wrong, you moron! Unfortunately that will not happen……… or will it?

You and devil were the same person, it must have proved too difficult keeping so many balls in the air that is why he has mysteriously disappeared. Perhaps you would like to bring him back to prove me wrong.

Deary, deary me if you brought devil back and kept your balls in the air it would prove me wrong that you were unable to sustain this feat, NOT RIGHT!

See trying to prove me wrong is illogical and foolhardy, for you that is!

OK, I admit it! I am FinkFurst, Tom Pride, The Devil’s Advocate and Irena Pribisevic, all rolled into one (and a couple more too). You were right all along! You’re far too smart for me. I really look such a fool, now your cunning posts have forced me to admit my deception!

Tom how do you explain how Fink was able to add comments where and when he wanted, while everyone elses goes in sequence? How did he reply to my comment at the same time as I posted mine?
Columbo would be scratching his head on that one!