Monday, August 17, 2015

BBC Bigots

Once upon a
time, news from the BBC was treated
as gospel truth. People trusted its credibility. Take for instance the Morbi Machchu Dam disaster of August
1979, most Indians abroad learned about the disaster through the BBC (which
killed unconfirmed numbers of 25000 and in which, incidentally, Narendra Modi
was a participant as relief worker). As a kid I took the radio to bed. I
listened to BBC World news, “Top of the
Pops” (TOTP – the weekly chart countdown) and humour shows like “Jest a minute” where celeb-participants
had to speak in jest on a topic for a minute without repeating a word. Till the
early 1990s UK had only 5-6 TV channels; BBC1 to 4 and ITV and maybe one more.
There was no 24X7 TV. The BBC usually closed programmes at midnight or in
exceptional cases around 2am in the night. They
closed with a Padre reading passages from the Bible so that Jesus could put
you to good sleep. All that changed on January
17, 1991.

On January 17,
1991 a little known cable TV, the first 24X7 channel, called CNN grabbed world attention by its LIVE
reporting from Baghdad during the first Gulf War. This was followed by a glut
of private cable TV all over the world, including UK where SkyTV came in. In
India, BBC started losing relevance as private channels started invading homes
since 1991 and even Doordarshan became a 24X7 channel. CNN became a household
name across the world and the US finally had a news-brand that was world
famous. Even Hollywood movies started using CNN in their movies as viewers
identified with the brand easily. Since then the story of BBC sliding into
disrepair, Commie indulgence, racism, homophobia, covering up Islamic
terrorism, Bigotry and hate-mongering has been phenomenal. Even citizens of the UK don’t trust the BBC anymore.

Over the last
decade the BBC has splendidly directed its venom against India (specifically
against Hindus) in line with our own private channels. The Beeb practices the
same fraudulent Sickularism that NDTV, India Today, ABPNews or Timesnow
practice and others practice. Their much preferred hate-target was and is
Narendra Modi and therefore Hindus or Hindutva. Take a look at this headline
trashing Gujarat’s growth while Modi was CM:

The Gujarat
growth story is a myth peddled by its govt claims BBC. Like the Commie-Pigs of
the other British magazine, The
Economist, the BBC has also run many articles trashing Gujarat and, where
possible, Hindus in a hate-campaign that tried its very best to stop Modi from
becoming PM. Like many Christian mags and channels that are predominantly
anti-Hindu the BBC also cleverly picks Commie writers from India who possess
exceptional prejudice and hatred for Hindus and Hindu civilisation. Most of
these anti-Hindu outlets were quiet over the corrupt, anti-Hindu regime of
Sonia. Of course, they would be thrilled that Jesus-Salesmen flourished under
the Catholic Sonia. I don’t normally pay attention to foreign media criminals
unless it starts to get extreme. The latest hate-mongering exercise from BBC is
called “Are Hindu nationalists a danger to other Indians?” by some Commie of Indian origin (probably
indoctrinated abroad with anti-Hindu hate).

What does that
article say? It rehashes the “Christians
under attack” nonsense. The sick campaign, that also ran in the Indian MSM
that was proved to be fraudulent propaganda against ModiSarkar. From the petty
theft in Holy Auxilium school in Delhi to the bogus Nun-rape case in Bengal (in
which Muslims were involved) – they all fraudulently screamed “Christians under
attack”. The BBC is a bit late in crying wolf. Dumb as they are! Then the
article quotes some reports on the Muzaffarnagar riots. And best of all, it
quotes that Commie Christian LIAR Suzie
Roy as gospel. Remember, Roy is the one who infamously concocted the "pregnant women raped and foetus ripped out”
story in the Gujarat 2002 riots. This little chicken backed out when her claims
were sought to be investigated and later retracted her story. That’s the lying
Morongini that the BBC quotes. Cool! And thus the garbage in the article goes
on and on. It also quotes some statistics on communal riots:

“But recently-released statistics on inter-communal violence
for the first half of 2015 indicate that there has been a 30% increase compared
with the same period of 2014 - a total of 330 attacks, 51 of them fatal,
compared with 252 attacks, of which 33 were fatal, in 2014”.

The female who
wrote that article quotes no source for her stats. You know, statistics is a
game for propagandists. It can be twisted from many angles and presented to
suit the agenda. Here’s statistics from a more reliable Indian source presented
after much debate in India:

That’s from an ET report where the GOI claims a
decrease of 20% in communal incidents. Now, what the criminal BBC which whines
about Hindu nationalists won’t tell you is that the most number of communal
incidents since ModiSarkar came in were in non-BJP
states. In other words the communal riots took place in States ruled by the
Sickular parties. That is an undeniable fact that doesn’t need statistics. For
BBC to claim this is all because of Hindu nationalists is the kind of
anti-Hindu propaganda that Commie-Pigs routinely peddle. The BBC represents the ego and arrogance of a fallen empire that still
thinks it can sermonise India without question. Get rid of that stupid
notion and your hatred for Indians and Hindus. Get rid of your bigotry and
hypocrisy first. Let’s do a roll-call of the series of crimes that plagues the
BBC.

The BBC is a den
of sexual perverts and following scandals it was found that 81 of their
perverts face sex-allegations over the Jimmy Saville episode. Half of them are still working at the crime-scene
called BBC.

In the episode
of Andrew Gilligan’s “sexed up”
report over WMDs in Iraq for which UK supported the war on Iraq, the BBC is
alleged to have leaked the source to the Govt. Leaking a source in a scandalous
report is a healthy journalistic practice? “…BBC
eventually did what the UK Government had wanted them to do all along i.e. name
Kelly as their source (the Government seemed determined to make Kelly the
source from the moment that Kelly came forward and admitted to the Ministry of
Defence that he had talked to Gilligan). David Kelly, the source,
allegedly committed suicide over the episode. That’s BBC for you.

In 2015, the BBC
carried a bogus, unverified report of India funding the MQM, a Pak organisation that is in revolt against its govt.
This anti-India report was laughable because it fuelled Pak claims against
India and the BBC could not back up their story with any facts whatsoever. Now,
if you think these are stray cases you might want to think again. The BBC has a
history of controversies over
bias, partial reporting, racism, homophobia, suppressing competitors and much
more. Read the link at leisure because the list is very long. And these
scumbags still think they can lecture India or Hindus. We are not done yet!

Out of the blue
the BBC aired a documentary on the Nirbhaya
rape case earlier this year. This twisted documentary by some Leslee Udwin was
to portray India as a society of rapists and in her own words she calls it a “Sick society”:

The British antiIndia-pig
sacked the co-producer of the film (an Indian woman) because she objected to
certain parts and is also accused to have paid the criminal rapists to read
from a script. This was done in collusion with the then Congress govt in India.
I have suspicions that bribery of govt officials may also have been involved
because the same GOI denied permission to an Indian channel to make a
documentary on Nirbhaya (Read Sick BBC & NDTV - Cultural-Rapists).
Funnily enough, the documentary was released after ModiSarkar came into power
and not during the Congress regime.

And while that
spiteful woman calls India a “sick society” the BBC continues to ignore its own
backyard in England. They blacked out the story of hundreds of young girls
molested, raped and/or murdered by Islamic goons. The British system continues
to hound and persecute an activist called Tommy Robinson who raises his voice
against these crimes.

The cowards of
BBC believe they still have the right to lecture India or Hindus and in this
effort they have found many anti-Hindu Commies from India who have been doing
the same for ages (who quote extreme Hindu-haters and liars like Suzie Roy as
one of the foundations of their frivolous theories). Bigots devoid of any
morals must realise that Hindus don’t listen to prejudiced foreigners anymore.
If the Hindus have arisen, it is not to destroy other communities but to assert
the right of their own culture from being trampled by Chrislamist goons. The
writer of the BBC article under discussion quotes some stupid Father of his churched
being burned because of short-circuit (he claims arson) to be equivalent to
burning of the Indian Constitution.

If India remains secular and still hosts a variety of
religions and cultures it is only because of Hindus. If Hindus had become as
militant as Christians or Muslims there would be no other community left in
India. Yet this Bitchy Broadcasting Corporation consistently hurls abuses at
Hindus and India through its Commie-slaves. Let’s go back to the first pic in
this post about Gujarat’s economy being a myth. It’s a great sample of the
filth that the BBC peddles against any govt where Modi has the top job (now he
is the PM so hurl falsehoods against Hindus and India). In less than 24 hours
the nonsense of that article was exposed and the BBC had to backtrack because the article typically was fact-less
and based on imaginary statistics. They changed the headline to read this:

So, from asking
if Gujarat’s red hot economy is a myth the article became “Gujarat IS (indeed) a red hot economy”. It’s not as if Hindus and
Indians don’t understand the filth the BBC is peddling. It is just that most
Indians have stopped paying attention to this bogus news agency. Here is something that the BBC should sit and ponder instead of blabbering nonsense against Hindus:

In the last 15 months, PM Modi has visited all major and smaller economic countries in the world - Australia, Bangladesh,
Bhutan, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Fiji, Germany, Japan, Kazakhstan,
Kyrgyzstan, Mauritius, Mongolia, Myanmar, Nepal, Russia, Seychelles, Singapore, Sri
Lanka, South Korea, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, United States, Uzbekistan, UAE. The UK has not been one of his priorities. Now you go wonder why.

I have long
stopped watching BBC or reading any of their bigots online. This is a rare
exception I make to let the BBC know – Attend to the muck back home in UK.
India is safe with Narendra Modi and with Indians.

Came across an 'alleged' journo of this commie channel on the way to Kathmandu for quake relief(who interviewed me too). With my limited English vocabulary...I told her -what Modi is doing may not be 100%right but he has shaken the status quo n that's what is troubling the rest!!!She didn't have anything more to ask thereafter;)

India is a country where Divide and Conquer has worked amazingly well. :: caste, religion, region, language, whatever. Our people have been brainwashed by the British and Congress rule to think like crabs and pull each other down. Since country never comes first in people's mind it is easy for foreign agents like our MSM and BBC to get away with destroying our image in the world with their lies and bribes. So many of our MSM news anchors are Cambridge educated, brainwashed and corrupt.

Imagine what can happen if this country united under the Hindutva banner, not the religion but the ideology of the Indian nation not segregated by false barriers. We can drive these morons to extinction I hope the youth of India don't fall into this divide and conquer trap that has held us back for generations.

I hadn't thought of it like this, but now realise that I've stopped watching my one time fav since joimpning SM. Even if I do stray to it, I don't find it interesting anymore. Of course @bbchindi is openly anti India. Hilariously my leftist friend has "discovered" @bbcworld. It sure is attracting the right audience . You are absolutely right when you point out that they find India hating Indian mules to spew hatred against India . Well written & well times too

The UK thanks to some stupid decisions by its 'politically correct' leaders has become a breeding ground for Islamic jihadis. The UK is now infested by Pakis who are involved in horrendous rapes of British children - which the Beeb conveniently ignores!! It won't be long before UK becomes the second caliphate, good luck to the idiots running UK! No wonder Modi doesn't care to go there and no wonder the BBC has stooped to such levels.

BBC, has become even more desperate after Cameron's win and total destruction of Labour even in Scotland. You can feel their frustration similar to our own MSM. I follow their comedy shows and the flavour has changed from a leftist tilt to full blooded commie speeches and propaganda!

Just to give an example of a podcast...there was one about contribution of Indian Mathematicians. It is clear that all the ancient Mathematics came from the Vedas. Yet when the mention where certain manuscripts or temple inscriptions were found, they mention Pakistan as if that country had anything to do with it. They fail to mention that the artefacts pre-date Pakistan and even Islam by a few 1000 years. Very subtle efforts made to somehow dilute the contribution of the Vedas and make it look like a regional thing.

Thanks for writing this post. Beeb needs a few blows to the head to try and bring it to senses.

Scroll has suddenly discovered Advani's 'contribution' to ending the parliament logjam, he is the current hero. The divide and rule policy of the media is getting well exposed thanks to SM writers like Ravi. Good work

Well articulated. The scum at the BBC depict the typical characteristics of the (Western) "liberal". Racist, condescending, ignorant, hypocritical and self-important. Their galactically stupid Indian "liberal" counterparts ape them with all the gusto of a loyal sidekick but without the context.

Generally speaking, at least in the West, left-wingers are no less racist and have no less a sense of racial superiority than "fascist" right-wingers. The difference is that that conviction is expressed in opposite ways; the latter overt and belligerent, and the former covert and moralistic. Both cases have equally deluded themselves of their own relevance in the world.

Thanks Ravinar for this excellent post. The best part I liked was "If Hindus had become as militant as Christians or Muslims there would be no other community left in India." Beautifully presented. Mr. Ravinar, have we ever thought why India remained a slave to the foreigners for so long. The answer is we never thought in unison, we were always divided into smaller heterogeneous groups, each with its own ambitions and aspirations, each trying to outsmart the other with cunning, thereby falling prey to invading vultures. We never thought as a unified society. In so doing we became loyalists to the foreigners, the looters, the marauders, and gradually a large section gradually degenerated into vassals of these foreign masters. This, coupled with their fascination for the white skin, the English language and European culture, created a society which extolled the foreigners and derided and ridiculed their own values. This section still exists, but with coming of Modi as the PM of India, this coterie of genuflecting sycophants found itself short of political and social relevance. But thanks to people like you for exposing the hypocrisies and duplicity of this anti national and anti Hindu brigade, who are still craving for bygone era when their voice was deemed to be the only sane voice, the voice of India. I thank you again for reinforcing the spirit of nationalism and Hinduism in a vast majority of young people, who have been led astray by the fulminations of these bigots who left no opportunity to discredit India and Indian values.

We in Maha too have become slaves to outsiders. India has become a ticket for the rest of Indians to 'migrate' to Maha and create all kinds of atrocities on Marathi manus from small time crimes to bomb blasts, exploitation, diet racism, and general Mahaphobia. North Indians rioted in August 2012 in Mumbai, molested policewomen, assaulted police, torched media vans and generally went berserk vandalising Amar Jawan Jyoti and creating mayhem. They wont allow us to speak, bring up the issues, celebrate our festivals. At the time of independence we did not know much about these people, we thought they were decent folks like us. Decolonise Maha from outsiders and grant us protection under Article 370. Jai Maharashtra.

I used to listen BBC for a long time. It was good but alway biased. In recent years it has degenerated to new low. Their coverage of India is full of negativity. In this article it has been rightly exposed.

BBC is in watched in India because of 'brown Saheb and Sahibas' who still think that British were good for India to the extend that a journalist's twitter handle is the same word. They hate India but stay in India because they know this country is where they can abuse and still get noted. These are the people who make BBC possible in India. BBC does not have the guts to see its own society.I wish the did!

recently bbc hindi ran a series of articles giving a picture that the investigation in cases where accused are hindus is tardy. written probably by aakar patel. ravinar, did it not come to your notice ? aakar patel is regular on bbc hindi.

BBC's reporting is not just misrepresentation, but also hypocritical.We need to post the following questions to every 'journalist' who reports on India:1) why does England have a state religion?2) why do they reserve seats in their parliament for bishops?3) why do they encourage religious (Christian) instruction in public schools?

I knew this about BBC long back.. and there are many more facts that prove BBC's agenda to push their anti-hindu stance. I simply do not watch this channel anymore & ask others not to watch telling them some facts - that's how I kick on their ass.

This comment is reagarding Arnab hoax and Rahul kanwal. I think by branding everyone who says anything against bjp as biased congress stooge we are giving excuse to congress crooks like Barkha and Rajdeep of branding all modi supporters as bhakts who react badly whenever bjp is criticized.

I have seen rahul kanwal doing really fine and unbiased reports, even arnab has bashed congis like sanjay jha and tehseen poonawala a lot of times. So lets not brand these 2 as biased because these 2 people bash amd praise all the parties.

The people who are real congress stooges are Prannoy roy, Barkha dutt (and all ndtv walas), Vir sanghvi, Rajdeep sardesai,Ravish kumar (Ndtv india), Om thanvi and Abhay kumar dubey. Lets target these people, I think the above named people will never ever do unbiased journalism and will always be biased in favour of congress. And i feel Rana ayyub is not a journalist, she is a bigot.

Why you think scumbags like Burqa and Rajdeep need any kind of excuse to spread their poison is beyond me. And Arnab Goswami is just as guilty as these two of riding roughshod over truth for his own agenda, even if his is different from theirs.

Ultimately, the time has gone where people are afraid to call a spade a spade. Why should we tiptoe around the criminals who abuse their position to spread lies? The order of the day is to thoroughly delegitimise them by confronting them head on, not indulging their flights of fancy. People are starting to learn this lesson more and more.

It is High time all Hindus must be UNITED and think and genuinely feel that they are the ligitimate and rightful RULERS OF BHARAT VARSHA OR HINDU RASHTRA.. The Mughals and the British were plunderers from a foreign land . They exploited the intrinsic goodness of Hindus and made us slaves in our own country.That doesn't mean that we hate the other community but Hindus in majority in our own country are diregarded . Unfortunately Congress are Anti-Hindu under the Nehru -Gandhi dynasty rule. So it was a continuatipon of Mughal and Britisgh rule. Had it been any other leader say Sardar Patel instead of Nehru ,such a situation would never have been there. India or Hindu rashtra CAN 100% secular ONLY under Hindu majoriy rule. Hinduism, in the very essence is secular. Congress is an arrogant Xerox of OF MUGHAL and British rule of lie, deceit and plunder and Anti -Hindu along with its crooks among the media and other dynasty chaprasis. NAMO IS THE TRUE SECULAR HINDU RULER and let this NEW begining continue for ages. And don'i TRUST the BACK STABBERS and FIFTH COLOUMNIST among the media politicaland Dynastic crooks.

I was thinking that BBC lost its value from 2000. Now only ?I understand that their reports from 1990 onwards itself are one sided and unreliable. Anyway, BBC exposed fully by now. It's another NDTv, unreliable. Why to waste our time in viewing these useless channels.

At least the BBC had credibility at a certain point of time, what credibility does Doordarshan, NDTV, Zee etc have, Zilch. Whatever, I would still believe the BBC more than any other media outlet Doordarshan, NDTV, CNN, Al Jazeera, Sky News, ABC, etc etc. Let the Bhakts believe whatever they want to.

This is just the continuation of anti Hindu & anti Indian propaganda started by Lord Macculay. If this is not counter attacked by us we will only be doing injustice to our nation and also our future generation. We've to start counter attacking by propagating the glory of Hinduism and India in all the medias, Visit exaltingindia.wordpress.com

Your damning opinion about BBC is with relation to how it reports stories about India. However, I still like it because it has a very global perspective and covers stories from across the world which Indian news outlets tend to neglect.

I do not use the BBC to follow local (Indian) stories. The media situation in India has changed a lot in the past 30 years or so. We have a lot more news outlets than we did before which are more suited for local news stories.

Journalists from the BBC themselves admit that there have been lots of changes for them in news gathering and reporting over the years. Nowadays, news from each region tends to be about what is 'trending' and being talked about by the news outlets and people of that region. In such a situation, the BBC, in stories about India, tends to reflect the broad views in the Indian media.

Of course, one could argue that the BBC should do a better job at unearthing facts, but I feel if the local Indian media, especially the english tv and print media, improves, that would make the coverage on the BBC more balanced as well.

Comments are welcome and are not moderated so as to allow free speech. However, comments that are off topic, abusive, defamatory or slanderous may be deleted. Comments disclosing personal information of individuals/entities will be deleted.Comments appearing here do not imply endorsement by author of this blog.