The opinion about gay men’s “unhealthy lifestyles” expressed by letter-writer Rosina Kovar is short-sighted and archaic. Unhealthy? What about all of the gay men who have been in monogamous, drug-free relationships longer than many heterosexual couples? The assumption that gay men are bed-hopping drug users is ignorant and outdated. If any man (or woman) wants to contribute blood to save others, let him.

Lisa Ehrle, Aurora

This letter was published in the Jan. 2 edition.

Submit a letter to the editor via this form or check out our guidelines for how to submit by e-mail or mail.

Brandon Zelasko claims that homosexual men are discriminated against, since federal regulations bar them from donating blood. Zelasko claims that current regulations are unfair to people like himself, and that this demonstrates homophobia.

But blood donation policies are based on statistics with respect to certain populations. In the U.S., more homosexual men have AIDS than other groups. Hence, the law, which protects people from tainted blood.

Yes, some homosexual men are committed to one partner and are not likely to have AIDS. But that is irrelevant. The law can neither read minds nor test all bodies. Nor does it assume that homosexual males are all sexually promiscuous. The law must protect the innocent based on statistical generalities. Therefore, the law, while discriminatory to homosexual men, is not unjust, since this policy protects the innocent and harms no homosexual men.

Douglas Groothuis, Highlands Ranch

This letter was published in the Jan. 5 edition.

I believe it is important to clarify three of the points presented by Brandon Zelasko.

First, Zelasko stated that “more Americans will continue to die because of a lack of donated blood.” Interestingly, research reveals no evidence of Americans dying because of a lack of donated blood in 2013. In fact, according to the American Red Cross, the blood used in an emergency is already on the shelves before an event occurs.

Second, a check at the American Red Cross website reveals that a joint statement has been before the Advisory Committee on Blood Safety and Availability since 2006 recommending a change from an indefinite deferral to a 12-month waiting period for men who have sex with men (MSM). However, due to concerns from the committee and patient advocate organizations, further study is being conducted to evaluate potential risks to the blood supply.

Third, other options to blood donation are available. Perhaps consideration might be given to volunteering or donating money as a substitute. Colorado has many worthy nonprofit organizations.

Shelly Collins, Parker

This letter was published in the Jan. 5 edition.

For information on how to send a letter to the editor, click here. Follow eLetters on Twitter to receive updates about new letters to the editor when they’re posted.

Guidelines: The Post welcomes letters up to 150 words on topics of general interest. Letters must include full name, home address, day and evening phone numbers, and may be edited for length, grammar and accuracy.