On 5/31/2011 7:17 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> In other words, we could say "foo"@bar is syntactic sugar for something
> like [ a rdf:LinguisticExpression; rdf:language "bar"; rdf:value "foo"].
> I know that doesn't address everything, but it has pretty much the same
> problems everything else does being modeled in RDF. :-)
That was a design considered and rejected by the previous group.
Personally I prefer it; but I don't think we should reopen that can of
worms.
Jeremy