Some people really need have their "bullshiat statistics" meter checked out. I automatically check any statistic that seems weird, even if it's supporting my side, because no one wants to be proven wrong.

The only incident that I'm aware of in which ping pong balls were dangerous was the time that Michelle Malkin got a case of the hiccups in the middle of her show and before they could get her a glass of water, she had killed seven members of the audience and wounded 12 others.

FloydA:The only incident that I'm aware of in which ping pong balls were dangerous was the time that Michelle Malkin got a case of the hiccups in the middle of her show and before they could get her a glass of water, she had killed seven members of the audience and wounded 12 others.

I was trying to work in a Michelle Malkin reference too, so I'm glad someone did.

Yes, I believe the speed of the killing IS what's important. Why do you rarely hear of a mass-murder involving some other method? Poison is difficult because you have to get all of your participants to willingly drink it. Knives are really bloody and take a lot of effort. Swords likewise. Chainsaws are unwieldy.

Please show me a single incident where one flat-screen television or ping-pong managed to kill 26 people. I don't have anything against private gun ownership but you do yourself a disservice by siding with this retard.

cameroncrazy1984:steamingpile: Yes because the speed of killing is what's important...

Yes, I believe the speed of the killing IS what's important. Why do you rarely hear of a mass-murder involving some other method? Poison is difficult because you have to get all of your participants to willingly drink it. Knives are really bloody and take a lot of effort. Swords likewise. Chainsaws are unwieldy.

cameroncrazy1984:steamingpile: Yes because the speed of killing is what's important...

Yes, I believe the speed of the killing IS what's important. Why do you rarely hear of a mass-murder involving some other method? Poison is difficult because you have to get all of your participants to willingly drink it. Knives are really bloody and take a lot of effort. Swords likewise. Chainsaws are unwieldy.

cameroncrazy1984:Yes, I believe the speed of the killing IS what's important. Why do you rarely hear of a mass-murder involving some other method? Poison is difficult because you have to get all of your participants to willingly drink it. Knives are really bloody and take a lot of effort. Swords likewise. Chainsaws are unwieldy.

What you are ignoring is that guns out of the hands of crazy people is more important, you will never get rid of guns in the USA, get over it.

Please show me a single incident where one flat-screen television or ping-pong managed to kill 26 people. I don't have anything against private gun ownership but you do yourself a disservice by siding with this retard.

/Texan//Fiscal Conservative Democrat

It is not the single tv or ping-pong to be worried about. They work together to kill a lot of people. Like velociraptors. We are in big trouble when the AR-15's evolve to learn this skill.