Well, we don't want to be changing the results that folks are already
relying on, but it looks like we are.

The benefit in putting the lsb test at the top is that most new and
future distros can be identified by that.

But, it looks like the safest thing to do is to put it at the bottom.
Unfortunately, that means that we have to run through all the other
tests, which will not match, for all future distros. Maybe it happens
so fast, even with the extra tests, that it's not worth worrying about.

Options:
a) Just put the lsb tests at the end (more computer effort over time)
b) Put the lsb tests in the middle, after distro tests that are
already defined, but that we know also have lsb info (more people effort)
c) I don't think leaving as is is an option, because if someone
updates to the latest version of whatami, it may break existing tests
they depend on.