Conor MacNeill writes:
[snip]
> > (2) I feel returning the lookahead String in nextToken instead of
> > scanning for a DOS path could be wrong in very strange cases (take
> > c:d:\path for example, this would return c, d, \path). I could be
> > wrong but maybe make it something like
Is c:d:\path a valid path on DOSalike systems? I'd have thought
c:;d:\path would be the way to express that; c:d:\path isn't really
valid on anything, is it?
Regards
Tom