I guess her new thing is to carry a prosthetic arm. Not a mannequin arm, but an actual prosthetic (above). Here’s another one from that shoot.

So is this just an artistic expression thing or is it actually insensitive? Some have pointed out that those with prosthetic arms aren’t psyched that Gaga’s posing with it like she’s Michelle Williams in a Louis Vuitton ad.

What do you think? Is it artsy, insensitive, or not even worth being offended by because it’s just a gimmick and she’ll find a new prop next week?

What I want to know is, why is she cradling the thing with a dumb ass dense look on her face? She thinks she looks fcking cool, too. That’s what’s funny about it. She isn’t edgy, she isn’t interesting and she isn’t even entertaining.. so she should drop the dumb ass act already bc she looks like a fool. The way she’s just staring at it in the first pic is funny as hell, hhahaha. That look on her face like she’s trying to model and convey some kind of story or reason as to why she’s doing that makes her look like such a try-hard hahaha

I hate when “artists” try to do weird and eclectic shit just to make themselves look cool and edgy when most of the time it just makes them look like complete try-hards bc the shit doesn’t even make sense, and that shit is embarrassing. I’m like, embarrassed for her in these photos!

i couldn’t agree more. i’m totally down for people getting into art and promoting it, but she seems to be trying to pull some stunts so she can claim it’s her being an “artist”…she’s not original and good for her becoming interested in the art world but people already don’t take art seriously and she’s really not helping that change by being a try-hard so she can sell another crap album
pass.
you may sit down now.

She’s just trying to revive her dying career and make a grab for media attention via scandal and controversy. Using the church doesn’t work for stars anymore. Sinead O’Connor and Madonna wore that out. What’s left? Wearing meat, prosthetic limbs, pouring blood on yourself onstage?