About Us

Eyes on Trade is a blog by the staff of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch (GTW) division. GTW aims to promote democracy by challenging corporate globalization, arguing that the current globalization model is neither a random inevitability nor "free trade." Eyes on Trade is a space for interested parties to share information about globalization and trade issues, and in particular for us to share our watchdogging insights with you! GTW director Lori Wallach's initial post explains it all.

August 09, 2013

A Fast Track to Greater Inequality?

President Obama is thankfully talking again about the yawning inequality in the U.S. In an interview with the New York Times late last month, he said that the ever-widening gap in income is "not a future that we should accept." Unfortunately, it's the future that his trade negotiators are promoting.

While Obama denounces inequality, the Obama administration is rushing to conclude talks on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a sweeping commercial pact with 11 Pacific Rim countries that implicates everything from the cost of our medicines to the safety of our food. The TPP also threatens to further widen the gap between rich and poor, as emphasized by economist Nancy Folbre in a New York Times piece this week, by perpetuating the inequality-spurring history of unfair trade deals spelled out below.

Obama recently implied that unfair trade "sends a lot of jobs overseas." When the jobs being offshored are primarily those of workers in the middle and lower income brackets, as has been true under the last couple decades of TPP-like deals, middle-class wages stagnate as upper-class incomes climb. The result: increased income inequality.

But Obama seems to miss this connection. Just last week, in his economic speech in Chattanooga, Tennessee, he praised the Korea Free Trade Agreement (under which exports have been falling) and vowed to get authority from Congress to sign more such deals. Obama's top trade official, Michael Froman, has confirmed that Obama would like to Fast Track deals like the TPP through Congress. Fast Track was an extreme and rarely-used maneuver that empowered executive branch negotiators, advised by large corporations, to ram through unfair trade deals like the TPP by unilaterally negotiating and signing the deals before sending them to Congress for an expedited, no-amendments, limited-debate vote. Apparently, Obama would like more of the same.

Stopping Fast Track would go far toward stopping the TPP. And halting the TPP would go far toward halting the upward march of income inequality. Unfair trade deals have been a steady drumbeat in that march:

As unfair trade deals have been Fast Tracked into law, U.S. income inequality has jumped
to levels not seen since the robber baron era. Today, the richest 10
percent of the U.S. is taking nearly half of the economic pie, while the top 1
percent is taking one fifth. Wealthy individuals’ share of national income was
stable for the first several decades after World War II. But that share has shot up 45 percent
for the richest 10 percent and 117 percent for the richest 1 percent since the passage of Fast Track in 1974, a time period characterized by a series of unfair trade deals. The income share of the richest 10 percent escalated particularly abruptly after the 1994 enactment of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). See the graph below.

The median family has been losing about as much to trade-induced inequality as to taxes. Longstanding economic theory predicts that
trade will increase income inequality in developed countries. In the 1990s, the pro-NAFTA Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE) sought to
quantify the effect of trade policy on U.S. income inequality, and found that
nearly 40 percent of the increase in inequality was attributable to U.S. trade
policy. When
the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) updated the PIIE figures, it found that the
median U.S. family lost about $2,300 per year (in today’s dollars) from the
burden of rising inequality due to trade. The wage losses from
trade each year for the median family are on par with the median household’s income tax
burden. EPI projects that, if current trade policies and trends continue, all
wage gains made since 1979 by workers without a four-year college degree (65
percent of the U.S. workforce) could be erased.

Changes in technology or education levels
do not fully account for U.S. wage pressures. Some have argued that advances in computer technology
explain why less technologically-literate U.S. workers have been left
behind, asserting that more education – rather than a different trade policy –
is how to end income inequality. While more education and skills are desirable for many reasons, these goals alone
will not solve the problems of growing inequality. First, as documented in a
Federal Reserve Bank paper, inequality started rising as systematic U.S. trade
deficits emerged, in the early Fast Track period, far before most workers
reported using computers on the job. Second, college-educated workers have also seen their wage growth stagnate, even in
technologically sophisticated fields like engineering. Thus,
rectifying unfair trade policy, not only better educating U.S. workers, will be an
essential part of tackling rising income inequality.