xwP3TJHD Datums: 2013-09-25
Free info like this is an apple from the tree of knegoedwl. Sinful? http://grmwhrdeuu.com [url=http://riylraqpil.com]riylraqpil[/url] [link=http://ntjhuvuunx.com]ntjhuvuunx[/link]

gyf263837q Datums: 2013-10-20
Sveiki JÄni! Thank you for commenting. I’ve read the article, and I think the idea absurd. Although for sure GDP is not the best indicator of economic development, it reflects well the level of economic activity. The author not only seems to not know economic theory, including Friedman and Hayek, as there is a deficit of logic. I shall ask you to forgive me not going into details, but basically the money spent by the government goes to the private sector, for example, by the consumption of goods and services from people who work for the government. Another example is the war industry, which each year consumes gods and services produced by the private sector. All financed by the government. In other words, following the author’s idea, the money spent by the government would never go into the private sector, remaining intra-government. Lacks logic, isn’t it? The author should go back to Economics 101. http://www.quoteforinsur.comhttp://www.memorialbaptistbeckley.com/accutane-...http://www.maqdown.com/cialis_online.html

G2WbePaUw Datums: 2013-10-23
I understand your party isnĀ“t a revolutionary one, any way I would submit it to you some considerations, as follow: I donāt know the partyās statutes and ideology, but I understand that any party that has as main objective, to drive the people to the needed changes in our misconception of globalized world has to conceive the unity as cohesion around collectively-accepted values and principles, which are supposed to be reflected in the party’s program, its statutes, its ideological foundations and its political activity, and which is destined to eradicate the fracturing dynamic of particular interests, today prevailing everywhere, I mean, in my country, at least. http://www.windows-phone-news.com/college-onlin...http://www.windows-phone-news.com/online-degree...

hFwEVYNa8 Datums: 2013-10-23
I understand your party isnĀ“t a revolutionary one, any way I would submit it to you some considerations, as follow: I donāt know the partyās statutes and ideology, but I understand that any party that has as main objective, to drive the people to the needed changes in our misconception of globalized world has to conceive the unity as cohesion around collectively-accepted values and principles, which are supposed to be reflected in the party’s program, its statutes, its ideological foundations and its political activity, and which is destined to eradicate the fracturing dynamic of particular interests, today prevailing everywhere, I mean, in my country, at least. http://www.tracygracedesigns.com/buy-viagra-onl...http://www.memorialbaptistbeckley.com/prednison...

1Y9EKdEE Datums: 2013-10-24
Sveiki JÄni! Thank you for commenting. I’ve read the article, and I think the idea absurd. Although for sure GDP is not the best indicator of economic development, it reflects well the level of economic activity. The author not only seems to not know economic theory, including Friedman and Hayek, as there is a deficit of logic. I shall ask you to forgive me not going into details, but basically the money spent by the government goes to the private sector, for example, by the consumption of goods and services from people who work for the government. Another example is the war industry, which each year consumes gods and services produced by the private sector. All financed by the government. In other words, following the author’s idea, the money spent by the government would never go into the private sector, remaining intra-government. Lacks logic, isn’t it? The author should go back to Economics 101. http://www.akseseriz.net/online-classes.htmlhttp://www.windows-phone-news.com/online-colleg...

IsGRpyPf Datums: 2013-10-24
Sveiki JÄni! Thank you for commenting. I’ve read the article, and I think the idea absurd. Although for sure GDP is not the best indicator of economic development, it reflects well the level of economic activity. The author not only seems to not know economic theory, including Friedman and Hayek, as there is a deficit of logic. I shall ask you to forgive me not going into details, but basically the money spent by the government goes to the private sector, for example, by the consumption of goods and services from people who work for the government. Another example is the war industry, which each year consumes gods and services produced by the private sector. All financed by the government. In other words, following the author’s idea, the money spent by the government would never go into the private sector, remaining intra-government. Lacks logic, isn’t it? The author should go back to Economics 101. http://www.windows-phone-news.com/college-onlin...http://www.windows-phone-news.com/online-school...http://www.windows-phone-news.com/online-degree...

gSljXLBAu Datums: 2013-10-24
I think that democratic country’s are unstable, but not because democracy, but because nation it self is not educated. There culd be smart government in he country, but if nation is not educated there still will be a problem. Where in smart nation is more dificult to get stupid and uneducated government. All post soviet countrys are unsteble and the problem is not just a uneducated politicans with no experience and understanding of politics, but the nations it self.Government in Latvia is made of ex-soviet polititians, ex-farmers-patriots and new polititians with no good pro west education.Peaople in Latvia don’t ask polititians what’s the plan of action to fix country or how you see Latvia after 20-50 years, and thats why polititians don’t bother to think abotu it.Polititians are lazy nad if peaople don’t push them to work they never will. People has to develop and only then develpo them country. http://www.akseseriz.net/distance-learning.htmlhttp://www.akseseriz.net/online-courses.html

GDSPx7Gav0 Datums: 2013-10-24
I understand your party isnĀ“t a revolutionary one, any way I would submit it to you some considerations, as follow: I donāt know the partyās statutes and ideology, but I understand that any party that has as main objective, to drive the people to the needed changes in our misconception of globalized world has to conceive the unity as cohesion around collectively-accepted values and principles, which are supposed to be reflected in the party’s program, its statutes, its ideological foundations and its political activity, and which is destined to eradicate the fracturing dynamic of particular interests, today prevailing everywhere, I mean, in my country, at least. http://www.akseseriz.net/distance-learning.htmlhttp://www.windows-phone-news.com/online-degree...

Ly5790rdc9Tb Datums: 2013-10-25
A. god. Vilni!Par eiro viss skaidrs, bet arÄ« ar esoÅ”o latu nav viss kÄrtÄ«bÄ. Vai Tu varÄtu aprakstÄ«t, kÄ darbojas LB tagad un pirms kara, kas ir lats utt. Daudzi to nesaprot, un esoÅ”o latu uzskata par agrÄkÄ lata turpinÄjumu. Faktiski mums taÄu nav suverÄnas valÅ«tas. To bÅ«tu svarÄ«gi saprast. I take of your own coments “Taking in consideration the distribution of right-wing, centrist, and left-wing groups, we can say that the partyās ideology is really centrist. Centrist, because the clash of internal forces soften the partyās ideology, making it to converge to the centre”, just to say that the centrist must be as a hardcore inside any considerd system; I mean as a reference, a model, of politicians and political purposals, actually is the most difficult position any case, specially for honest people with honest and coherent purposals. Let me know of your success. I wish you all the best! http://www.tracygracedesigns.com/buy-viagra-onl...http://www.memorialbaptistbeckley.com/accutane-...