http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11609
--- Comment #4 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> 2011-09-30 19:19:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Michael, if I recall correctly (not a foregone conclusion!), Jonathan told us
> that the change against 1.0 2ed was on his To Do list, and that we agreed to
> remove the bug from the agenda on that basis. ...
>
> Do you disagree that we made the decision to make the same/analogous change to
> 1.0/2.0 as against 3.0?
No, it's quite possible that we made that decision and it didn't get recorded
in the minutes (or here).
And it's possible that Jonathan put the change on his To Do list for 1.0 2ed,
but (as far as I can tell) there's no record of that either. (In particular, he
didn't mention it when he marked the bug resolved-fixed.)
That lack of record is mostly why I reopened the bug.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.