Meltzoff, A.N., & Decety, J. (2003). What imitation tells us about social cognition: A rapprochement between developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 358, 491-500.

Kruger, J. & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 6, 1121–34.

Vosniadou, S., Skopeliti, I., Ikispentaki, K. (2005). Reconsidering the role of artifacts in reasoning: Children’s understanding of the globe as a model of the Earth. Learning and instruction, 15, 333-351.

Difficulties in science learning - related to the development of scientific, experimental reasoning skills

Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., Unger, C. (1989). “An experiment is when you try it and see if it works”: A study of grade 7 students’ understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. InternationalJournal of Science Education, 11,514–529.

Zimmerman, C. (2005). The development of scientific reasoning: What psychologists contribute to an understanding of elementary science learning. Paper commissioned by the National Academies of Science (National Research Council’s Board of Science Education, Consensus Study on Learning Science, Kindergarten through Eighth Grade).

Carey et al. (1989). “An experiment is when you try it and see if it works”: A study of grade 7 students’ understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. InternationalJournal of Science Education, 11, 514–529.

Hennessey, M. G. (1999). Probing the dimensions of metacognition: Implications for conceptual change teaching-learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.

Klahr, D. (2009). “To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heavens”: What about Direct Instruction? In S. Tobias and T. M. Duffy (Eds.) Constructivist Theory Applied to Instruction: Success or Failure? London: Taylor and Francis.

Flick, L. (1995). Complex instruction in complex classrooms: A synthesis of research on inquiry teaching methods and explicit teaching strategies. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Sanf Francisco, CA.

Klahr, D. (2009) “To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heavens”: What about Direct Instruction? In S. Tobias and T. M. Duffy (Eds.) Constructivist Theory Applied to Instruction: Success or Failure? London: Taylor and Francis.

Pasquinelli, E. (2013). Slippery slopes. Some considerations for favoring a good marriage between education and the science of the mind–brain–behavior, and forestalling the risks. Trends in neuroscience and education. 111-121.

Bennett et al. (2005). A systematic review of the nature of small-group discussions aimed at improving students' understanding of evidence in science. Department of educational studies. Research paper.

Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Examining the sources for our understandings about science: Enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 3, 353–374.

Crowther, T.H., Lederman, N.G. & Lederman, G.S. (2005). Just do it? The impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 487-509.

DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of research in science teaching, 37, 6, 582-601.

Lederman, N.G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of research in science teaching, 29, 4, 331-359.

Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916–929.

Lederman, N.G. (2006). Research on nature of science: reflections on the past, anticipations of the future. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 7, 1, 2.

McComas, W.F. (2002). Science and its myths. In M. Shermer (Ed.), The Skeptics encyclopedia of pseudoscience, pp. 430-442. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC CLIO Press. Also published as The Principle Elements of the Nature of Science: Dispelling the Myths in the California Journal of Science Education (2005) 5, 2, 37-67.

Osborne, J.FCollins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., Duschl, R.. (2003). What ‘ideas-about-science’ should be taught in school science? A delphi study of the ‘Expert’ community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 7, 692–720.

Osborne, J.F., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., Duschl, R.. (2003). What ‘ideas-about-science’ should be taught in school science? A delphi study of the ‘Expert’ community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 7, 692–720.

Pigliucci, M. (2010). Nonsense on stilts : How to tell science from bunk. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.

Rothman, M. A. (1992). The science gap. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.

Sagan, C. (1996). The demon haunted world : Science as a candle in the dark. New York : Random House.

Smith, M., Lederman, N.G., Bell, R., McComas, W.F., & Clough, M. (1997). How great is the disagreement about the nature of science: A response to Alters. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 1101–1103.

Giere, R. (2003). A new program for philosophy of science ? Philosophy of science, 70, 1, 15-21.

Klahr, D. (2009) “To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heavens”: What about Direct Instruction? In S. Tobias and T. M. Duffy (Eds.) Constructivist Theory Applied to Instruction: Success or Failure? London: Taylor and Francis.

Tweney, R.D. (1993). Steps toward a cognitive science of science (interview with R.D. Tweney). In W. Callebaut, Taking the naturalistic turn, Or, How the new philosophy of science is done, pp. 341-349. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.