I am unable to express sympathy in words which can possibly do any justice to the scale of calamity here – a scale so momentous that “whose parallel may only be the one of Sinai when something was revealed to mankind.”

Therefore, I would humbly like to express something far more effective here: a hint to the way forward for the dispossessed which could potentially end their dispossession and the suffering of their kith and kin on ground zero!

In another one of your missives: “Zionist Designs on Lebanon” (shunpiking magazine), you clearly demonstrated your command of pertinent history of the conquest of Palestine when you noted:

“At the Versailles Peace Conference, in Paris, in 1919, the World Zionist Organisation submitted its official plan for the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine. The submitted map included the entire area of Palestine, the Southern part of Lebanon to the Litani River, the Syrian Golan Heights and the East Bank of the Jordan River, to the railway line. This design explains clearly the continuing expansionist Zionist programme…”

So you must also be aware in whose palace in Paris the Versailles Peace Conference was held and the Treaty signed? And to which family name Balfour Declaration was addressed to?

Therefore, is it logical to presume that the World Zionist Organisation represented their very interests when it submitted its official plan for the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine?

That's the logical conclusion the text of the Balfour Declaration itself suggests for those not un-attuned to the power-plays of the oligarchs on the grand chessboard:

'November 2nd, 1917

Dear Lord Rothschild,

I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet. “His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

Yours sincerely,

Arthur James Balfour'

Therefore, the real prime-mover personages behind your and 6-8 million other Palestinians' Dispossession and Suffering is not the famous errand boys and girls of Zionistan whom you quote and whom we all know about.

But those persons whom you are silent on.

The Zionist lieutenants wielding the actual guns and butter and taking on the mortal sins of genocide upon their souls have only been carrying out the agenda of their financial prime-movers.

'[T]he statement of Efraim: “Not an existential threat. Israel is indestructable. I don’t think we should talk to in apocalyptic terms”, is for all practical purposes, and for the foreseeable future, the most accurate assessment.

That Efraim's observation is not just false bravado, but accurately anchored in the famous 1923 political science statement of VladimirJabotinsky which is often misunderstood by the innocent to mean the physical Wall that is today closing off the Palestinians into open-air concentration camps while its intellectuals delightedly accept Peace and Orwell prizes for their own narratives of moral truth:

“The Zionist colonization must either stop, or else proceed regardless of the native population. Which means that it can proceed and develop only under the PROTECTION of a POWER which is independent of the native population behind an iron wall, which the native population cannot BREACH.” — V. Jabotinsky

What is that PROTECTING POWER that has lowered that figurative constricting Iron Wall upon the indigenous population of Palestine which its natives simply cannot BREACH? Never mind BREACH, when I eventually locate a Palestinian intellectual who can even see that PROTECTING POWER, I'll know that it's finally too late!

Damn it, who sustains Zionistan? In whose name is Balfour Declaration issued?

Please endeavor to understand that PROTECTING POWER, and you would have actually understood the prime-mover of "legitimacy".

That word, "legitimacy", is merely a euphemism for PRIMACY of the oligarchy. Henceforth, the syntactically un-sugared capitalized form is used.

Not "conflicting narratives", but the PROTECTING POWER is what's the core fundamental force behind the exercise of PRIMACY in Palestine. That PROTECTING POWER creates many narratives, many conflicts, and manages their controlled and orchestrated clash for beneficial cognitive diversity: the Left-wing, the Right-wing, the Abhorrent Straussian claiming “in the age of atheism, the Jewish people can no longer base its existence on God but only on itself alone, on its labor, on its land, and on its state.” to the Pious Orthodox bobbing at the Wailing Wall, all of which singularly serve to dilute the one truth that is to be supplanted with conquest in order to raise the new phoenix from the ashes of humanity left behind!

And it is not just the exercise of PRIMACY upon the largely agrarian Palestinian populations who lived peaceably side by side and who were suddenly overwhelmed by the sophisticated European ASHKA-NAZI onslaught as also accurately observed by Khalil Nakhleh in his essay, but it is also the indivisible prime-mover force behind the PRIMACY upon the entire world's populations! World domination in a One-World government. It is the exact same PROTECTING POWER, and it has analogously caught the entire world's people unprepared!

That PRIMACY (“legitimacy”) granting PROTECTING POWER, unless challenged ab initio, is handing the fate of the Native Americans to the Palestinians while the learned among them write their erudite theses dissecting the anatomy of “Contested histories”, “contested narratives”. I find this to be an entirely asinine and empty war of words! Useful perhaps for writing academic papers and history books. However, entirely futile in the real world run by the PROTECTING POWER which directly benefits from what the author of the essay has glibly dismissed as “sheer nonsense!”

The real heart of that PROTECTING POWER beats not in Zionistan – which is itself a monumental mystery of such cataclysmic proportion “whose parallel may only be the one of Sinai when something was revealed to mankind” that the heavens too might perhaps now be lamenting why did it ever foist the "chosen peoples" upon mankind, and which all mankind today can see the spectacle of to sing our Hallelujah in gratitude – but in the Golem that lives elsewhere. And which, apparently, none can see even when it hides only in plainsight and actively thrives on that obscurity by controlling all the public narratives where its name is never mentioned! Even by its own victims.

That golem is the real PROTECTING POWER which Jabotinsky had knowingly invoked for the Iron Wall. This POWER is independent of the native population of Palestine, a POWER which they in point of fact cannot BREACH by the manner in which they have been conducting their struggle.

We are running out of time exhausting ourselves in the war of words dear friends of Palestine. A very good red herring distraction that is also noted in the Protocols. Please study them carefully. It is in fact Machiavelli Second Edition plusplus, and it doesn't matter who are its authors. The Protocols speak as much glaring truth of many an empirical matter of diabolical statecraft, as did the solo Machiavelli. Perhaps a lot more!

For all the singular courage displayed by Palestine's young lads hurling physical stones at the Goliath tanks, and its fair maidens fighting the Zionists' pull on their hijab ; for all the tears of parents and grandparents crying themselves to sleep reciting Fatiha while casting their own stones at the tanks of insanity to keep them at bay ; and with each unequivocally delineating the power calculus before it is eventually transformed into narrative mythology to be handed down from generation to generation ; there is evidently not one single intellectual parallel of it which can hurl a single penetrating intellectual stone at the PROTECTING POWER in order to effectively BREACH that IRON WALL!

Let's change that! This is a battle of both 'mens et manus', just like MIT's credo, 'mind and hand'! Not just of hand alone.

End Excerpt

That points the way forward. Unmask the Golem.

With best wishes to an old truth-teller telling it the way it was, from a tad younger one who is humbly telling it the way it is.

Zahir Ebrahim

Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

California, United States

Statement signed in Dr. Ismail Zayid'sGuestbook on Thursday April 08, 2010

Reprint License

All
material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with
full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety,
unmodified and unedited, for any purpose, granted in perpetuity,
provided the source URL sentence and this copyright notice are also reproduced verbatim as part
of this restricted Reprint License, along with any embedded links within its
main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license
violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All figures, images,
quotations and excerpts, are used without permission based on
non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research
use only in the greater public interest, documenting crimes
against humanity, deconstructing current affairs, and scholarly
commentary. The usage by Project Humanbeingsfirst of all external
material is minimally consistent with the understanding of "fair
use" laws at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html.
Project Humanbeingsfirst does not endorse any external website or organization it links to or references, nor those that may link to it or reprint its works.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you
are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your
request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents
in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the
documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You
are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from
other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”.