Poor WG, even fairweather fans could spot the obvious error here. Not hit the heights of 2011 yet but could beat that run in the coming weeks with the games we have (London, Whiffness, Wakefield)

Score: 2

mparsons says...1:41pm Mon 7 Jul 14

Warrington-biker, you missed out the home Challenge Cup quarter-final loss to Wigan on July 23. My article does not say that only Super League games were being considered. The stats are correct as stated.

Warrington-biker, you missed out the home Challenge Cup quarter-final loss to Wigan on July 23.
My article does not say that only Super League games were being considered.
The stats are correct as stated.mparsons

Warrington-biker, you missed out the home Challenge Cup quarter-final loss to Wigan on July 23. My article does not say that only Super League games were being considered. The stats are correct as stated.

Score: 1

warrington_biker says...1:49pm Mon 7 Jul 14

mparsons wrote…

Warrington-biker, you missed out the home Challenge Cup quarter-final loss to Wigan on July 23. My article does not say that only Super League games were being considered. The stats are correct as stated.

Appreciate the response Mike, but your article title depicts otherwise -- "Warrington Wolves break Super League era record at Hull FC" The Challenge Cup isn't part of the Super League tables or title race, therefore, our loss-free record remains 11.

[quote][p][bold]mparsons[/bold] wrote:
Warrington-biker, you missed out the home Challenge Cup quarter-final loss to Wigan on July 23.
My article does not say that only Super League games were being considered.
The stats are correct as stated.[/p][/quote]Appreciate the response Mike, but your article title depicts otherwise -- "Warrington Wolves break Super League era record at Hull FC"
The Challenge Cup isn't part of the Super League tables or title race, therefore, our loss-free record remains 11.warrington_biker

mparsons wrote…

Warrington-biker, you missed out the home Challenge Cup quarter-final loss to Wigan on July 23. My article does not say that only Super League games were being considered. The stats are correct as stated.

Appreciate the response Mike, but your article title depicts otherwise -- "Warrington Wolves break Super League era record at Hull FC" The Challenge Cup isn't part of the Super League tables or title race, therefore, our loss-free record remains 11.

Score: 0

mparsons says...2:06pm Mon 7 Jul 14

Warrington-biker, Super League era is from 1996 until now - it is simply a reference to the date range as used in this article. So it is a record for the period 1996 until now - a record for the number of consecutive wins in the Super League era, a period which deserves and regularly receives it's own statistics recognition due to players switching to full-time status There is nothing in the article or headline that states the statistics are only relevant to Super League games.

Warrington-biker, Super League era is from 1996 until now - it is simply a reference to the date range as used in this article.
So it is a record for the period 1996 until now - a record for the number of consecutive wins in the Super League era, a period which deserves and regularly receives it's own statistics recognition due to players switching to full-time status
There is nothing in the article or headline that states the statistics are only relevant to Super League games.mparsons

Warrington-biker, Super League era is from 1996 until now - it is simply a reference to the date range as used in this article. So it is a record for the period 1996 until now - a record for the number of consecutive wins in the Super League era, a period which deserves and regularly receives it's own statistics recognition due to players switching to full-time status There is nothing in the article or headline that states the statistics are only relevant to Super League games.

Score: 0

jonesy1980 says...3:15pm Mon 7 Jul 14

Can see what you are getting at mparsons, but have to agree with warrington_biker, it was slightly misleading.

Can see what you are getting at mparsons, but have to agree with warrington_biker, it was slightly misleading.jonesy1980

Can see what you are getting at mparsons, but have to agree with warrington_biker, it was slightly misleading.

Ipsoregulated

This website and associated newspapers adhere to the Independent Press Standardards Organisations's Editors' Code of Practice. If you have a compaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then please contact the editor here. If you are dissatisfied with the response provided you can contact IPSO here