US-ISIS
alliance on verge of conquering major Syrian city

The
U.S. had paved the way, on 16 September 2016, for this conquest, by
bombing Syria’s troops and weapons-compounds in Der Zor. Those
government forces were protecting the residents there from ISIS
mercenaries and weaponry, that are financed by Saudi Arabia, and
armed by the U.S. and other members of the Saudi-led alliance.

As
the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), which at the time was
under the leadership of Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn (who will be incoming
U.S. President Donald Trump’s National Security Advisor), had
warned the rest of the Obama Administration in a cable on
12 August 2012:

“THERE
IS THE POSSIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING A DECLARED OR UNDECLARED
SALAFIST [fundamentalist Sunni] PRINCIPALITY IN EASTERN
SYRIA (HASAKA AND DER ZOR), AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE
SUPPORTING POWERS [U.S., Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey] TO THE
OPPOSITION WANT, IN ORDER TO ISOLATE THE [pro-Russian and
pro-Iranian] SYRIAN REGIME.”

The
American journalist Seymour Hersh reported, on 1
January 2016 in the London
Review of Books (after
the New
Yorker and
other U.S. print news media had refused to publish his article),
“Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, director of the DIA between 2012
and 2014, confirmed that his agency had sent a constant stream of
classified warnings to the civilian leadership [Obama] about the
dire consequences of toppling Assad.

The
jihadists, he said, were in control of the [U.S.-backed] opposition
[Obama’s ‘moderate Syrian rebels’].” Obama then fired Flynn,
for opposing U.S. participation in the Saudi alliance to overthrow
the secular and Russian-allied government of Syria’s President,
Bashar al-Assad.

After
the election of Donald Trump (who hired Flynn back as his National
Security Advisor), the U.S. Democratic Party and some influential
Republicans have been accusing Mr. Trump of being, essentially, a
Russian agent and a grave threat to U.S. national security — much
like, in the 1950s, the far-right John Birch Society and U.S. Senator
Joseph R. McCarthy had accused U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower of
being ‘soft on communism’ if not outright pro-Soviet and a
traitor in the White House.

The
anonymous blogger who goes by the name of “Moon
of Alabama” or
“bernhard,” has been issuing most of the important news reports
about the Syrian war, especially concerning these developing events
in Der Zor.

One
of those sources, which was cited by
“bernhard,” had tweeted
on 12 October 2016:
“Breaking news: Sources in #London say: ‘#US& #Saudi_Arabia
concluded an agreement to let #ISIS leave #Mosul secretly& safely
to #Syria’!” And that’s exactly what then happened. Note that,
according to this tweet, it was the Saudis, not Obama’s regime, who
made the deal. If the Saudis were acting on behalf of Obama, the U.S.
aristocracy was in the driver’s seat, but that would have been
highly unlikely, especially because Obama
has routinely been doing the Sauds’ bidding.
Included in that have been his
efforts to block prosecution of
the Saudis for having financed
9/11.)

For
example: as one strong friend of the royal Arabs, Hillary Clinton,
has said in private:

“We
need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence
assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi
Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic
support to ISIL [ISIS] and
other radical Sunni groups in the region.”

Saudi
Arabia is owned by the Saud family (the Thani family own Qatar); so,
she knew that they are the main funders of Al Qaeda etcetera (or,
like Osama bin Laden’s former bagman said of Al Qaeda’s
financing, “Without
the money of the — of the Saudi, you will have nothing”).
That family controls the government, and all the rest of their
aristocracy do whatever the Saud family tell them to do. Hillary
wasn’t naive.

Bernhard’s
January 17th report banners “How
The U.S. Enabled ISIS To Take Deir Ezzor” (“Deir
Ezzor” is a different Anglicization of “Der Zor”) and he simply
assumes there that Syria and Russia will be defeated at Der Zor, and
that the Saudi-led alliance, (commonly called “The West,” though
since 2001 it’s led by the Sunni-fundamentalist Saud family who
financed the 9/11 attacks and
who financed Al Qaeda and other jihadist groups), will win.

That
victory would mean exterminating all people there who oppose ISIS. If
this plan succeeds, then the only way that Syria would be able to
retake Der Zor will be to reduce the entire city to rubble, which
would provide a field-day for anti-Russian propagandists, including
Western ‘humanitarian’ agencies (such as “The
White Helmets”).

The
reason that there is no ‘peace dividend’ from the 1991 breakup of
the Soviet Union and end of its Warsaw Pact military alliance and end
of their communism (especially after 2001), is that America’s
“military-industrial complex” (as Dwight Eisenhower called it in
1961) has taken over the U.S. government, and they are refusing to
let go of it.

America’s
aristocracy (and the foreign billionaires who also control America’s
‘defense’ firms) are too heavily invested in it, to allow the
government to be freed from its grip.
Instead, they are determinedly and increasingly now buildingand buying deep underground luxury bomb-shelters for themselves and
for their core
people,
and continuing to pay Senators and Congressmen whatever they need in
order to defeat any potential political contenders who refuse to
cooperate.

They
mean business. Some people call this new America, “perpetual war
for perpetual peace.” It is America’s trickle-down version of a
‘welfare state’. But what could trickle down at the end of it
might be nuclear bombs, which wouldn’t be welfare for anybody,
except possibly, the owners of that “military-industrial complex,”
if they’d actually be enjoying high ‘welfare’, deep
underground.