Saturday, June 7, 2014

Movie Review: Godzilla (2014)

There’s very few dinosaur movies in theaters nowadays. The
last time I saw one on the big screen was in December, and that in turn was the
first in years. So when I see a film that can be described as a dinosaur film,
I must watch it. Yes, I saw Godzilla last week, and I can assume most people
interested have already seen it so I can discuss it spoilers and all. Just to
be safe, I’ll put a cut here before I get into the details.

As my previous Godzilla article showed, I’m a fan of the
series. I even re-watched a few films before watching Gareth Edwards’ take on
it.I even watched the 1998 debacle that
very few people genuinely enjoyed. I was prepared for anything-there have been
very good Godzilla films, and very bad ones, so I feared the worst, hoped for the
best, and expected something in the middle. It’s a good strategy to get through
life.

It wasn’t as good as I hoped, but not a bad film and
certainly re-watchable. It’s a deeply flawed film, but it stands as a Godzilla
film and for a few moments it’s amazing. I fear that Hollywood is just afraid of making a Godzilla
film. Godzilla is only briefly seen, but that is expected. Most Godzilla films
spend a long time without Godzilla, and the Heisei era (1984-1995) films were
most notable for stories where the focus is on humans and their bizarre,
tangential, kaiju-related adventures before Godzilla takes the screen.Some of the worse ones, like those made from
2001 to 2004, are often interrupted by the human story, which seems to take
preference. In the last four Japanese Godzilla films, there seems to be a
complete disinterest in Godzilla, playing either a generic villain or
supporting hero.

I was prepared to spend most of the time with the humans.
After all, even the very first Godzilla film was entirely based on the
decisions of four human characters. The trick is to make them interesting to
watch so they don’t feel like filler or bland stereotypes. Sadly, this one
falls prey to the same flaw. There’s no one truly obnoxious like the child
characters of the 1968, 1971, 1973, and 2002 Godzilla films or the news
reporter heroines of the 1999 and 2001 films, but like those of the 2004 and
2003 films, it suffers from completely uninteresting young men as the heroes
when more interesting characters exist.

Aaron-Taylor Johnson plays Ford Brody, an army munitions
technician whose father is obsessed with a strange anomaly that killed Ford’s
mother. His job keeps him in the action, and his wife and child are naturally
endangered, so he’s the main human character. He’s also entirely uninteresting.
Johnson has no charisma or likeability whatsoever, and writer Max Borenstein
has a bizarre sense of priority by focusing on his character.

This is especially frustrating as there are two far more
interesting characters the story could focus on. First is Joe Brody, played by
Bryan Cranston. One of the opening sequences is Joe, working at a fictional
Japanese nuclear plant that is destroyed by an anomalous earthquake. His wife
is killed in an emotional scene, and he is driven to discover what caused the
anomaly, and how to end it. He is killed in the opening monster scene, however,
leaving his compelling plot line entirely abandoned and his entire character
pointless to the preceding

The other character is Dr. Ishiro Serizawa (first name based
on Godzilla’s reoccuring director Ishiro Honda, second on the tragic scientist
of the first film), played by Ken Watanabe. His father killed in Hiroshima, Serizawa leads
the organization Monarch in a search of bizarre anomalies covered up by the
world’s governments and exposits on the kaiju. He is given little to do besides
a little exposition-his counterpart in the original film, Dr. Yamane, has more
time in the film and has a strong inner conflict between his scientific
principles and his duty to the common good.Serizawa appears early in the film, disappears for a while, and then
returns to the action very occasionally until the very end.

The problem probably comes from the fact that the plot was
re-written by five people. Sometimes it’s a military-based film, not dissimilar
with the horrible film Battleship from two years ago, with the practical but
stupid Rear Admiral Stenz constantly
acting to stop the monsters. Sometimes it’s a disaster film, focusing on
people fleeing from floods, fires, and earthquakes. And sometimes it’s a
Godzilla film, and that’s where it’s at its best.

What the promotion of the film hid from the audiences until
near the end was that it wasn’t a simple “Godzilla on a rampage” film. For
this, I applaud them. This was a major weakness of the 1985 reboot and 1998
films, where we’re resigned to see Godzilla fighting the army until a plot
contrivance dispatches the beast.Most
of the destruction, including the opening nuclear plant destruction, is done by
a pair of horrific kaiju called MUTOS. Born of beady art-deco chrysalis, first
a male then a female hatch and wreak havoc from Honshu to Yucca Mountain.Godzilla only appears later in the film to
confront and destroy the monsters.

There’s really no character arc in this film, nor is there a
real moral, which makes the overwhelming time spent with the humans pointless
and nothing better than padding.There
are only two intrapersonal conflicts-Serizawa wants to allow Godzilla to
destroy the MUTOS while Stenz wants to destroy all monsters (pardon the
pun-that’s my favorite Godzilla film) using the navy and army.

However, it’s when the action moves to the kaiju that the
film comes alive. The male MUTO awakes about half an hour in, destroys its
containing base, and then takes flight. The MUTOs are inspired designs; their
heads are triangular like Gamera’s nemesis Gyaos, with bright red glows acting
as eyes. Their mouths are murderous staple removers and bodes long and thin.
Their limbs are two pairs of long hooks like the thumbs of a bat.Best of all is their sexual dimorphism; the
male is smaller, swifter, and equipped with a pair of wings that unfold for
flight, while the female is much bigger, stronger, and her third pair of limbs
are nimbler versions of her other two pairs.Their danger to humanity is their hunger for nuclear energy, chowing
down on missiles and reactors. A train carrying a nuclear missile is raided by
the male MUTO, who presents it to its mate who in turn places it in a nest.

Godzilla himself is consciously a sort of crocodilian bear.
The skull is short, square, with small eyes and large nostrils. The arms are
long, equipped with alligator-like paws. The legs are long and thick and based
on short tridactyl feet. Instead of white or silver conifer-shaped
dorsal-plates, the spines are black slates resembling rocks eroded by savage
winds and waves. The tail is long and sinuous, a powerful propeller for
swimming and a lethal weapon.

The monsters are seen mostly in darkness, probably to
heighten their terror and conceal the effects, much like the first two Godzilla
films. Godzilla makes his debut in the nocturnal inferno of MUTO’s attack on Honolulu airport. The
final battle takes place in a stormy night. Thankfully, unlike the other kaiju
film of the year, Pacific Rim, there are some well-lit scenes of the animals
such as the female MUTO’s rampage in Las
Vegas and Godzilla’s return to the sea in the finale.

The fights are frustratingly fleeting-there’s only briefly
some scenes where Godzilla and the MUTOs fight in a long shot that stays on
them. It’s frustrating to cut from Godzilla clashing with the male MUTO in the
middle of San Francisco
to the younger Brody’s equally forgettable and bland wife.The payoff is worth the wait, however, as the
final battle consumes the Bay Area. Godzilla rips through the army attacking
him from the Golden Gate
Bridge to confront the
MUTOs, who have met and are destroying the city. The male attacks first, but
fails to leave much of an impact. The female then attacks, but Godzilla manages
to gain the upper claw on her. The male recovers and together they overwhelm
Godzilla. The female returns to her nest, while Godzilla recovers enough to
kill the male with a tail swat and burn the female with his atomic ray.The audience in my theater, including me,
applauded wildly at Godzilla’s victory, and cheered at his dispatching the
MUTOs.

That’s basically how I rate a Godzilla movie: Godzilla’s
character, the monster fights, the music, the human characters, and the
effects. In this case, the weak spot is the human characters-it’s not a new
problem, either. It proved to be a disaster in Godzilla Final Wars and the 1998
Godzilla film. However, it succeeds in having satisfying kaiju sequences, it’s
well directed and edited, the effects are excellent, and Godzilla’s character
is well done. I like this take on Godzilla-an alpha predator and monster hunter.
He’ll destroy humanity if they get in the way, but he’s not a villain.

It’s not my favorite Godzilla film, or even in the top ten,
but still on the good half of the series. I recommend it, albeit with a lot of
patience. I give it 73 out of 100.Go
watch it; it’s the best thing in theaters right now.

I pretty well agree with your description. My brother and I saw it together, and he was just like "that was terrible!" Part way through I asked him what was going on and he kind of shrugged and said that none of it was making sense, so it was ok I was confused. :P I really loved Godzilla! He was so cool and TOTALLY made the movie for me, but like you pointed out, he didn't have much screen time. I was also sad Juliette Binoche died so early, and Bryan Cransta, too! Anyway, solid critique!

About Me

Hi everyone! You may know me already, but 99% of you won't. I've decided to make a blog for myself. I'm a anthropology student who has returned to his original passion for palaeontology. Ever since I was little, I've been fascinated with the weird and wonderful animals that have inhabited our planet and I've made this blog to keep this in my mind and hopefully in yours. Most people blog about their interests, and while I've got a range of interests-see history and anthropology above, not to mention zoology, astronomy, art, cooking, science fiction and fantasy films and literature, and a myriad of others, the one I want to do for a living is the study of Earth's ancient past.

On this blog I'll review papers, talk about fossils, museums, and taxa, review art, film, literature, and our culture's view of paleontology, and share memories and insights. I've been inspired by the far better blogs of professional palaeontologists, and I'll share them as time goes on. I'm also open to requests and questions of opinions, the latest palaeo news, and discussions with other fans informal and professional.

I think this is going to have fun, and I'm hoping my readers will have just as much fun.

Copyright: All media and print reviewed belongs to the owners and publishers. Likewise, all art used for this blog belongs to their artists. This is a non-profit blog for education and entertainment.