Black Holes, Galaxy Growth and Nassim Haramein

I don't know if many of you are familiar with Nassims work in theoretical physics, Scale Unification( a universal scaling law for all matter), Torque
and Coriolis Forces in Einstein's Field Equation and Grand Unification Theory, and Quantum processes with considerations of space-time torque and
coriolis forces in surrounding media of black holes and vacum structures. Nassims theories rely heavily on black holes as a form of a perpetual return
to singularity via gravity and subsequent electromagnetic resonance of matter back into the vacuum. Currently his theories have received a big boost
by results just in from the American Astronomical society using the Very Large Array in Mexico. Black holes lead to galaxy growth

Astronomers may have solved a cosmic chicken-and-egg problem -- the question of which formed first in the early Universe -- galaxies or the
super-massive black holes seen at their cores.

"It looks like the black holes came first. The evidence is piling up," said Chris Carilli, of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO).
Carilli outlined the conclusions from recent research done by an international team studying conditions in the first billion years of the Universe's
history in a lecture presented to the American Astronomical Society's meeting in Long Beach, California.

so does that mean we are infact in a black hole? and thats why we cant see anything??

ohh noooessss hehe

My theory on how the universe got going is it GREW or was born..Not bang

bang = bull

Your theory sounds similar to Nassims in a way, and black holes are important to the generation of matter via electromagnetic resounace out of a
returning of matter drawn by gravity into singularity. Althought how this feedback system, that geometrically appears as a double taurus, originally
existed is another interesting matter and may have GREW or was BORN. Never the less this discovery supports Nassim' theory and I though it was worth
sharing here in relation to the origins of the universe.

I think this quote from the article in the OP explains Nassim' theories perfectly.

"This constant ratio indicates that the black hole and the bulge affect each others' growth in some sort of interactive relationship," said
Dominik Riechers, of Caltech. "The big question has been whether one grows before the other or if they grow together, maintaining their mass
ratio throughout the entire process."

This quote also asks some important questions as to the origins of this relationship and how it generates itself and the galaxies that result from it.

While this is true for stars, how do stars form in the first place. Black holes in this model(and Nassim's) would be needed to create matter via
electromagnetic resonance that would eventually return to the black hole singularity via gravity.
This observation( the article in the OP) is supporting this Idea by showing this system may have been in existence before stars, but obviously as this
is new, how black hole existed first is now a question that needs to be answered.

"To understand how the Universe got to be the way it is today, we must understand how the first stars and galaxies were formed when the Universe
was young. With the new observatories we'll have in the next few years, we'll have the opportunity to learn important details from the era when the
Universe was only a toddler compared to today's adult," Carilli said.

While this is true for stars, how do stars form in the first place. Black holes in this model(and Nassim's) would be needed to create matter via
electromagnetic resonance that would eventually return to the black hole singularity via gravity.

If black holes created matter by electromagnetic resonance, it actually could not leave the balck hole. Matter has mass, and since gravity attracts
mass, it would be attracted even before it escapes out to form the entire galaxy, just as how light cannot escape from the black hole.

Here is another article showing stars forming near black holes and may also lend support to Nassim's theories.

LONG BEACH, Calif. - Two embryonic stars discovered just a few light years away from the Milky Way's center show that stars can form in the
potentially destructive reach of the powerful black hole at our galaxy's center.

Astronomers have long known that young stars could be found near the center of the galaxy, but they had no idea how the stars got
there.

If black holes created matter by electromagnetic resonance, it actually could not leave the balck hole. Matter has mass, and since gravity attracts
mass, it would be attracted even before it escapes out to form the entire galaxy, just as how light cannot escape from the black hole.

These are great questions, and ones that relate to how we traditionally view black holes as only gravitaional events within the vacuum. Nassims Idea
is that it also acts as a constant feed back loop between Gravitaional return of matter towards sigularity and resounace of electromagnetics into the
vacuum that we experience as matter.

But one thing puzzles me, I know that black holes emit gamma rays from the center of the accretion disk, and when there is no matter available for
consumption, it disintegrates emitting hawking radiation, but, there is no data, of actual matter being released.

The black hole gives off radition becouse ITS there... we can only detect it becouse its infact not black

its only black becouse of "no light" But its very very much there... and it does not spit out anything.. it radiates ; )

Matter and energy are not the same thing "well they are but they do different things"

Thats what hawkins theroy means

I know that they are refered to as black because not even light can escape its gravity, but it is not black at all. All I asked is, that there is
evidence of gamma rays coming from the accretion disk but not matter. This is contradictory to this theory.

So you agree then that black holes infact are emiting energy back across the event horizon. In fact if you look at black holes they also emit light
and radio waves as well as x-rays. Look at quasars. Accretion disks also expel massive amounts of electro magnetic radiation. This is very
interesting as in Nassim's model he believes the surrounding vacuum acts as a structure that reacts to these events surrounding the black hole and
the subsequent release of energy that the black hole draws conserves and transforms. There is also the effects of plasma, torque and spin as well as
QED that he considers.
If you read the papers in the OP, aspects and elements of these, as well as equations, are explained in greater detail.

Perhaps I was not clear in pointing out that matter does not instantly appear across the event horizon by his theory, includes other elements that
react with this electromagnetic resonance, particulary the vacuum of space which Nassim believes is structured.. Cheers.

The explanation of quasars struck me, quasars are supposed to supermassive black holes in the deep intergalactic space and based on the red shift,
they are supposed to be from the early stages of the universe, and who knows, maybe these actually formed the galaxies we are seeing in the present
time.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.