I'm not setting up and running those machines. The operator is responsible.

I don't get why this is so hard to understand.

Mixing up words. Yes, someone (in this case, the operator) may be responsible for the problem.

But you yourself also have a responsibility, to do the right thing...

I have done the wrong thing in similar situations. I know it was the wrong thing at least I admitted it to myself and learnt from it and tried not to
do it again. I feel I grew from the experience.

I hate to think how many participants in this thread are missing the point completely. Is it cognitive dissonance, do you really not understand? This
is why the world is going to hell. And don't get me wrong - it's not because someone took $20 from Walmart or wherever - that's all irrelevant.

It would be better to take the money and say you couldn't care less, knowing it was wrong, than to a) believe it's not wrong and b) shift the blame on
to someone else?

Happened to me. Cashed my paycheck but didnt check the envelope with the money til later that night. Found an extra $1000 in it. What a shock.
Both my parents were in banking so I knew someone would get fired. Called the extra hours banking line and was at the door before the bank opened at
9am. The poor teller cried because she thought they would fire her if she couldn't find the missing money-she hugged me-I told her I was sorry for
not checking til later that night. Never entered my mind to keep the money-and could have really used it but I knew she would be fired. I couldn't
live with that and felt better after talking with the manager that she wouldnt lose her job over the mistake.

Oh I bet it entered your mind to keep it! Even just a split second... be honest with yourself as that's a big theme of this thread!

The fact you mention you could have used it, you thought about her potentially getting fired... the fact it was $1000 in cash, hard to prove or trace
back to you (but not impossible...)

I'm writing this, not to negate what you did. I could be wrong but you made the right decision, in a (difficult for some) moral dilemna. It shows you
are strong, and sure - if in fact you did consider keeping this large sum of money and ultimately made the decision to return it.

If there was no chance of someone getting fired, would you have made a different decision?

If some company that is well known for exploiting it's employees messes up like this, why would anyone feel beholden to not take advantage?

I find it a bit rich that the guy is being touted as a criminal.
Surely he honoured his part of the contract by paying the price Walmart expected for the goods? It ain't on him if they then gave away extra money.

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: MisterSpock
its not sad. 95%+ of the human race would have done the exact same thing. But you get to pretend to have higher morals on the internet, so theres
always that shining light.

You are wrong. It is sad you think this way. I don't believe 95% would have done the same thing. Not even 95% of people with the mental disorder you
are pretending to suffer from on the internet would have done the exact same thing.

originally posted by: SprocketUK
If some company that is well known for exploiting it's employees messes up like this, why would anyone feel beholden to not take advantage?

Can you think of any reasons why?

Sure, free money.
the second part of my post explains my thoughts on it.
It's their error but the guy fulfilled his part of the contract.
You see companies do it to people all the time where they hide charges in small print so the end cost to the consumer doesn't reflect the headline
price.

It most certainly is illegal. The first person who got back the 20 should have informed staff that the machine was malfunctioning. Instead he
invited friends over, that makes it conspiracy to defraud and steal. When you take something knowing it isn't yours that's stealing. No wonder this
country is going to hell. Everybody thinks like you.

originally posted by: SprocketUK
If some company that is well known for exploiting it's employees messes up like this, why would anyone feel beholden to not take advantage?

Can you think of any reasons why?

Sure, free money.
the second part of my post explains my thoughts on it.
It's their error but the guy fulfilled his part of the contract.
You see companies do it to people all the time where they hide charges in small print so the end cost to the consumer doesn't reflect the headline
price.

just a bit of corporate karma imo.

I was asking if you could think of any answers to your own initial question. Why would someone feel beholden to not take advantage? I would be
surprised if you couldn't.

originally posted by: SprocketUK
If some company that is well known for exploiting it's employees messes up like this, why would anyone feel beholden to not take advantage?

Can you think of any reasons why?

Sure, free money.
the second part of my post explains my thoughts on it.
It's their error but the guy fulfilled his part of the contract.
You see companies do it to people all the time where they hide charges in small print so the end cost to the consumer doesn't reflect the headline
price.

just a bit of corporate karma imo.

I was asking if you could think of any answers to your own initial question. Why would someone feel beholden to not take advantage? I would be
surprised if you couldn't.

Ah, I'm on the same page as you now.

There are lots of reasons.
Not many apply to a corporate giant like Walmart.

If it was a mom and pop place or some charity shop then I doubt many of us who are sticking up for this guy would feel the same way.

As it is, it was a drop in the ocean to a company that screws suppliers, employees and customers for every cent they can get so I don't think this
man or his friends deserve any condemnation.

originally posted by: FlyingFox
The first time the $20 came out didn't break the law, the subsequent times did...

Nope, still not illegal. Unethical maybe, but not illegal

Find that hard to believe... can you clarify?

If a cashier gives you the wrong change, it is not stealing (thus not illegal) to accept the change. It may be a mistake on the cashier's part (and
they usually are responsible for it as well), but they are giving you the change. There is no difference when a machine does it instead of a person.
A machine can only do what it is programmed to, thus the person who loaded the wrong bills may be held responsible but not the patrons. So like I
stated earlier, unethical maybe but not illegal.

Sure, how about calling his kids and buddies to get them to do the same..that is were it gets borderline crooked..imo

nah, chances are they are in the same boat.
No different to calling them up to let them know that they skipped a load of out of date beer or something really.
That's just my opinion though and like I said, they did bugger all measurable harm to Walmart.

I have no love for Walmart believe me..I despise them. When I was younger I wouldn't of thought twice about keeping that kind of windfall, be it found
money or simular. Where I am now as a person I would not feel right keeping something that wasn't mine.

I have no love for Walmart believe me..I despise them. When I was younger I wouldn't of thought twice about keeping that kind of windfall, be it found
money or simular. Where I am now as a person I would not feel right keeping something that wasn't mine.

That's cool. And found money is a bit different isn't it?
but hey, Why waste time condemning someone who takes a tiny advantage of a firm like Walmart now and then?

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.