Given that our blood supply often falls short, should gay men be allowed to donate blood?

Since 1977 the FDA has banned blood donation for life by any man who has had sex with a man—even once. In a July Journal of the American Medical Association
commentary, Eli Y. Adashi, a former dean of medicine and biological
sciences at Brown, joined Harvard law professor I. Glenn Cohen and
Harvard law student Jeremy Feigenbaum ’11 in arguing that this policy
is not only outdated but is plainly discriminatory against men who have
sex with men (MSM).

The authors propose a policy change that goes beyond earlier proposals
by some medical organizations to merely reduce the ban to a year since
the last sexual encounter. Adashi and his coauthors propose adopting a
model similar to Italy’s, in which all potential donors, “MSM or
otherwise,” are questioned to assess their individual risk behaviors.

Adashi says that diagnostic techniques have improved so much since 1977
that “we can now pick up an early infection easily within two weeks.
You can be comfortable that, if you test somebody over two weeks and
they are negative, they just are not likely to carry the disease.”

He adds that, if you ask someone if he has had sex with another man
since 1977, “you basically require that to donate blood he has to be
celibate, and that’s of course not a reasonable expectation.
Effectively, by doing this, you have excluded the entire population of
men who have sex with men in the United States, of which there are
millions. It’s impractical and unreasonable to demand celibacy as a
condition for a donation.”

The policy in countries such as Italy, Adashi points out, is to offer a
detailed questionnaire that stratifies the level of risk and then
augment that with an interview between the potential donor and a
health-care professional. The population is then divided into a few
risk categories. Low-risk or no-risk men are allowed to donate, while
high-risk candidates are retested in four months, at which point they
are allowed to donate if they are still HIV-negative. Potential donors
who engage in such very high-risk behaviors as intravenous drug use are
given a lifetime ban.

Filling out a more detailed questionnaire raises privacy issues,
however. How much personal information should a blood donor be required
to provide? “This will have to be studied,” Adashi says. “Nobody is
suggesting that we jump into a new system willy-nilly.”

Illustration by Timothy Cook.

Be the first to comment on this article

Name and Class Year:

Email:

Comment:

Code:*

The Brown Alumni Magazine is published bimonthly, in print since 1900.