Edwards V. Aguillard - Research Paper Example

The origin of man has been debated for long and has brought up many controversies about how people and other things came to existence. Some scholars have argued that man evolved from other animals, the apes, while others have argued that man was created by another supreme being…

Extract of sample"Edwards V. Aguillard"

Download file to see previous pages
From these experiments and results, it was found logically to say that man evolved from apes. Theories were created that proved these points. Then another science came into view: the creation science. With the creation science, it was argued that man was created by a supreme being, and that was the origin that proved somewhat true. Over the years, scholars have argued about the existence and origin of man. Some have supported the evolution theory while others have supported the creation science. In this particular essay, attention will be focused on a case that was ruled by the supreme court in 1987. It was between Edwards and Aguillard. Edwards supported the evolution theory while Aguillard supported the creation science theory. By the end of it all, the court had ruled that both creation science and evolution be taught in public schools. A law was created for this purpose, which received much opposition from schools that were affected by this law. The argument was that if creationism was taught in public schools, it would be unconstitutional since it would attempt to make a particular religion more advanced than the other. (Scott 199). With both theories about creation at hand, the main cause of concern was that one cannot be taught while the other is not. This would mean that if, say, creationism was taught and evolution was not, then students would dwell more about the knowledge on how people came to exist based on the creation theory (Jacobs, 33). They would not have come to know of a theory that taught the origin of man through evolution. In such a case, only one particular religion would be promoted and instilled in the young minds of students. A major question that people should ask themselves is: If one religion is taught in a public school science class, why cannot other theories about the development and origins of life also be taught in the same school? It was a biased move – one which would enable the existence and knowledge of one particular discipline while extinguishing the other (Scott 212). The major conflict was between the Creationism Act and its agreement with the Establishment Clause (Brownstein 15). The Creationism Act was such that it forbade the teaching of the evolution theory in public schools unless the teaching of creation science was also involved. At the time, there was no need for any of the theories to be taught in schools, but the Act stated that should one be present, the other should be present too. This meant that the only way evolution would be taught was by the inclusion of instructions from creation science. This, from any other view, indicated that one was nonsexist if the other was not in existence either. From this argument, it was viewed that this promoted creation science more than it did evolution (Young and Strode 232). It was more of promoting a religious doctrine that taught about the existence of life from a Christian point of view. So as to show that the Creationism Act catered for the best interests of students in schools, it was argued that both were the evidence proven scientifically, which dealt with creation and evolution, and there were also inferences from that scientific evidence (Haynes 40). Beyond doubt, both were to go side by side in science classes, and as it seemed, academic freedom was present. Academic freedom is the choice to
...Download file to see next pagesRead More

...?Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Edwards, one of the most important philosophical theologians of America, has been famous as a philosopher as well as a missionary and is positioned among the greatest ever intellectual personalities of the nation. He was born in East Windsor on the 5th of October 1703 in a puritan evangelical family as the fifth child of Rev. Timothy, a minister and Esther Edward. Christian theology, Bible, Classics and ancient languages were the subjects of his childhood studies (Jonathan Edwards: Biography). As a child, inquisitiveness was an observable character of Edward and he wrote two essays on the habits of flying spider and the nature of soul even at the age of ten. He was very much interested in different areas... of...

..., was furious by this proud claim and formally declared war to England. So Henry V was not the one who made the allegation to the French throne; he only continued the demand of his ancestor, Edward, which began the war in the first place. Also, the movie shows the two nations supposedly living in peace with each other before the affirmation of Edward, when in reality the two nations were in the state of a long-lasting warfare. For the next 52 years the war raged with both countries having their victories and losses. Some truces were signed, but the conflict was still not resolved. By 1389, both sides were exhausted with an enormous loss of men and the death of skilled troops and war...

...?Order 569592 Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Edwards was one of the most prominent leaders of “The Great Awakening” that took place in Colonial America.“The Great Awakening” was a fire and brimstone approach for the revival of Puritanism in Colonial America. Edwards felt that this society was on a path to hell and through his fiery preaching, he could scare people out of hell. Today, those preachers who preach in the same fashion are called evangelicals. They and some parts of the media exploit disasters. The preachers do it to frighten people; the media does it for ratings; all they talk about are wars, natural disasters and crime that seem to be running rampant in society and how they are...

...? Critical Thinking Assignment: Florida v. Harris Florida v. Jardines Introduction Consistent in all global legislative systems, legal cases are initially sought out in lower and trial courts. Subsequently, the decisions are appealed and challenged in higher courts such as Supreme Court. Various concurring and dissenting opinions are revealed during the hearings of the cases and all circumstances are carefully accounted for before reaching final conclusion. References to past legal cases are very critical as situations of most of the cases resemble to those in older ones. This paper entails a detailed discussion and critical analysis of two separate legal cases which have mutually similar circumstances....

...RE-DEPLOYMENT IN IRAQ 11/29/2007 Mr. John Edwards Valued RE: Redeployment in Iraq My Dear John Edwards, With reference to your directions for providing political background on important policy issues that are likely to come about the in the next two years, I have made extensive researches and explored the recent surveys and opinion polls with regard to the problem of re-deployment of U.S forces from Iraq. I would like to offer my findings and recommendations for solving the problem of redeployment of the U.S troops from Iraq as follows:
Introduction: The recent surveys that I have come across show that there are serious rifts among Democrat leadership about the success of war in Iraq. A recent survey...

...Compare and Contrast Jonathan Edwards' Sermon and Shakespeare's Character's Speech These two texts, Jonathan Edwards' Sermon "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" (1741), and Portia's speech from William Shakespeare's Merchant of Venice (c1598), represent two views of God in the World. Written over 150 years apart, Shakespeare and Edwards seem to have very different ideas about the nature of God, and his relationship to his most difficult creation, humans. Edwards was a Calvinist, and therefore viewed salvation as a predestined gift: humans from birth are either destined for salvation, or not, according to the will of God. The human is impotent to act and gain salvation...

...4 November 2009 Miranda v. Arizona Miranda v. Arizona Ernesto Miranda was arrested by Arizona’s police onthe charges of kidnapping and rapping. Miranda, on March 13, 1963, admitted to three crimes. Miranda’s confession statement which was duly signed by him contained a paragraph at the top that it was a voluntary confession, made without any assurance of protection or threats and “with complete familiarity of his legal privileges, including any declaration which he made might be employed against him. Later, Miranda’s admission was allowed into testimony at the trial, and he was sentenced based on his confession at trial. (Cross & Miller, 165).
However, some legal professionals were of the impression...

...The John Edwards case of due: ment of the relevant facts
John Edwards is a former senator of the U.S from North Carolina. He was accused of conspiring to receive and hide contributions past the allowed limits. These came from Rachel "Bunny" Mellon and Fred Baron. As per the Federal Election Campaign Act, the most amount an individual can donate to a candidate in the year 2008 was $2,300 in the primary election and $2,300 in the general election. Edwards was also accused of using campaign funds to pay for his mistress’ expenses (Jenkins, 2012). Edwards and his campaign officials were unethical when they all conspired to violate campaign finance laws by accepting and not disclosing hundreds of dollars in an attempt to cover Edwards... ’...

...Lesson V Supervisor Briefing Paper Critical Legal Thinking Siva V. 1138 LLC What is the liability of an LLC for itsdebts? What is the liability of a member-owner of an LLC for the LLC’s debts? Explain
The limited liability company is liable for all the debts incurred by the business without personal liability extended to its owners. Therefore, a member owner is only liable up to the extent of his contribution in the business and no personal assets would be used to recover the debt of a limited company he owes. However, he is personally liable if he personally guaranteed for the company debts (Cooper & Lyman, 1998).
Ethics
Did Hess owe an ethical duty to pay the debt owed by 1138 LLC to Siva? Did Siva act...

...Wolf V. Colorado And Terry V. Ohio Case Wolf V. Colorado, 388 U.S. 25 When a court is faced with a case deemed as a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and State law through search and seizure by police of individuals,when deciding whether they crossed the federal constitutional line;the United States Supreme Court takes into consideration state search and seizure practices at the time of the Fourth Amendment’s enactment and current state practices.In this regard when interpreting the Fourth Amendment,the court in defining the scope of Federal protection both trusts and mistrusts modern state policing policies,sometimes declaring them unconstitutional ...

2 Pages(500 words)Case Study

sponsored ads

Save Your Time for More Important Things

Let us write or edit the research paper on your topic
"Edwards V. Aguillard"
with a personal 20% discount.