On May 20, 2008, at 7:43 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> If your concern is that in this case the containing shrink-wrap box
> should be wider, that seems valid; note that the width computation
> for this shrink-wrap box is not defined in the spec either.
I think that is the main concern here. How wide should the _auto-
width_ wrapping floated box be in this case ?
Should it be as wide as the box with 'overflow:hidden', or should the
width of the wrapper include that of the floated inner-box ?
Here is a slightly different test case. It differs from Ingo's
testcase mainly by adding white space after the ':' in the
'overflow:hidden' string.
The other boxes are there for the purpose of reference and comparison.
<http://dev.l-c-n.com/_ingo/bfc/bfcnebenfloat2.html>
Philippe
---
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/