1 Redding is on the best moto 2 bike ever made2 minstral is the worst even a 50cc moped is quicker3 takes years to be good on a moto gp bike unless your Biaggi,Rossi,Marquez,Rainey,Schwanz etc etc4 has more points then that idiot Cruchlow in his 1st year5 Marquez is a super alien and can't be compared6 CRT's are really quick7 all Smith haters know nothing about moto gp and smell

he set the 8th fastest lap too i gather. gud job brad.. getting faster even with the injuries and crashes.. when the bike slammed into his back i didnt think hed be racing let alone getting faster..well done..

I'm in the camp of thinking BS doesnt really deserve this ride. I also believe Scott Redding has had to fight to get to where he is today and ultimately is a far better rider than Bradley.

However, if you look at a photo of BS's finger from his tweeter feed you can't help but have some respect for the guy. It's ghastly. I wouldn't be able to use a pencil for a month with a finger like that so riding a MotoGP bike is petty amazing.

stuart .... fair comment mate. but if bradley had been up the front in moto 2 on a kalex then i dont think anyone would begrudge him his tec 3 ride....and seeing how his ex teammate is going this year(who rarely got anywhere near brad) on a kalex and how much kent and louis rossi are struggling (both race winners last year) youd have to believe he would have been....

it now seems he made the mistral look way better than it is .... bottom line here is even herve said their bike was way off last year and said bradley was doing an" amazing job" i think the frase was... which was also his thaughts when he gave him the contract the previous season to ride the moto gp bike and id fancy herve being the man to know... just like when he signed cal and 80%of people on here said hed never do anything.....

Join
the conversation - Add your comment

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.