Comments on: Raiders seem to have a flimsy case against JaMarcus Russellhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/
ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.comSun, 02 Aug 2015 20:31:22 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/By: granadafanhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632960
Tue, 01 Jun 2010 17:44:49 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632960rough_cutter says:
May 29, 2010 2:53 AM
you guys bashing Al sound so stupid. like you have any idea at all what the heck is goin on inside their organization or what the contract details are. does anybody think they would try to recoup some money if they didn’t have evidence proving they deserved it?
———————————————–
Just because you file a lawsuit, doesn’t mean it’s not frivolous or that you can go outside the contract.
Here’s a history of Al’s lawsuits against the league and everyone else.http://bleacherreport.com/articles/147408-just-sue-baby
]]>By: Randallhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632959
Mon, 31 May 2010 07:32:55 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632959Can’t they just “best interest of the league” Al Davis’ ass out of Oakland?
]]>By: Raiders757http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632958
Sun, 30 May 2010 17:48:01 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632958Whoops, forgot to comment on this.
“AND NOT hiring a REAL QB coach”
You do realize that the Raiders hired two of the better QB coaches in the league in Paul Hackett and Ted Tollner.
Your posting that, proves you have no clue as to what your arguing about, and it’s probably best you just STFU.
I’ll also point out that Cable’s authority has never been undercut. I’ll give you Kiffin, but mind you, that issue was over Russell. Kiffin didn’t want Al to draft him. Bringing him up in this discussion proves my point. Yes, there are some of us who thought Russell wasn’t going to live up to the pre-draft hype. I guess, according you, Kiffin is the only person in the world who thought Russell wasnt’ a first round draft prospect. The rest of us are just liars.
]]>By: Raiders757http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632957
Sun, 30 May 2010 17:34:21 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632957@ edgy1957
Geez, don’t take things so personal. I’m sorry to tell you, but there is a minority of us who didn’t want the Raiders to draft him, and saw beyond the hype. Do you really want me to go searching through KFFL and 20 other Raider boards to find posts I made back in 2007? That’s just ridiculous.
Also, what does living in Oklahoma have to do with anything? I see your point, but thanks to the internet, I would say we’re all on an even playing field. Mind you, I do live in ACC country, so we do get a large tilt of games for that conference. Still, I can go on the internet and stream any game I can find. This issue is irrelevant though. I have interest in LSU due to my families Cajun background, even though I’m a fan of UVA and William & Mary.
The fact of the matter is this. I watched Russell play. I listened to what was being said for two years by his coaches, teammates, and classmates. I made a judgment, and I was right. I didn’t want my team to draft hime. They did. I got pissed off. Simple as that.
Despite not wanting Al Davis to draft him, I still pulled for him, as he wore the silver & black. The last thing I wanted to do, was tell his supporters that “I told you so”. I judged him correctly from the information I was provided. Just because I’m right, it’s not something I’m proud of. Still, to call those of us who saw all of this coming, liars, is out of line. He was judged as a risky pick with a huge upside. That should tell you, that yes, there were some of us who didn’t buy into the hype.
There were red flags with him. He should have been a third or fourth round prospect, which he was, until the hype machine took control. His numbers in collage are misleading, as he benefited more from the system than the system benefited from him. It was reported that he didn’t have a firm grasp on the starting QB position as well. Even worse, it was reported that his team mates and coaches had to push him along to do what it took to succeed an NCAA level(aka, he had babysitters).
I don’t care what you think, but the NFL combine is basically a job interview for the NFL. Russell proved the naysayers right when he showed up out of shape. That’s like showing up for a job interview in a wife beater, cut off shorts, and drunk as far as I’m concerned.
I’m with you in the opinion of pro days for QB’s. The thing is, Russell’s pro day impressed people so much, they forgot about all his other faults. He shot up the prospect board after that(combined with the bowl game against a weak ND team). Everyone was blinded by his big arm, and forgot about his actual football knowledge and leadership ability. Those two things are a huge issue in my assessment of a college QB prospect. Hence the reason why I knew Russell shouldn’t have been drafted that high. He ever displayed either one of those intangibles at LSU.
Call me what you will, but I’m no liar. Like I said, I was pissed when Al Davis drafted him.
]]>By: OntBoltFanhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632956
Sun, 30 May 2010 14:55:15 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632956Actually in all fairness OAK’s slide has only been of recent and I’m sure they will be back. They were in in the SB not too long ago (2003?).
Al had some misses but he also had some nice finds like Michael Bush, Kirk Morrison and Chaz Schillens along with decent high round draft picks like Darin McFadden, Zach Miller and Louis Murphy.
They added 2 great tackles and had a solid draft this year, one of the best of all teams IMO.
I could see them winning most of their home games this year with Campbell and a good running game behind that rebuilt line.
]]>By: edgy1957http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632955
Sat, 29 May 2010 17:44:31 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632955Raiders757 says: May 29, 2010 4:16 PM
I call your bluff there buddy. I’m no liar. I’m record on quite a few message boards saying I didn’t think
***********************
1. Prove it.
2. If you had paid any attention, you’d see that I laugh at the Combine AND Pro days, especially for QBs.
3. Gee, you must be the only person in America who actually watches college football. PUHLEEZE. The best part about being in Oklahoma is that I get to see ALL the different conferences so I miss very little that goes on and because of the Internet, I can see the schools in the lower classifications.
4. Everyone (but supposedly YOU) that saw his film were impressed by him.
Look, for a guy that is so lazy, he started for 2 years (and would have started as a senior) and got significant playing time as a freshmen and he kept Flynn off the field when he was healthy. You’ll have to pardon me for saying this but if he was so lazy then Flynn must have been one hell of a sloth. The Raiders screwed up big time by not signing him early AND NOT hiring a REAL QB coach AND undercutting the authority of Kiffin and Cable.
Also, let’s not forget that he regressed last year and he actually had a pretty decent second season AFTER they finally settled the receiver situation.
]]>By: Raiders757http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632954
Sat, 29 May 2010 16:16:38 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632954edgy1957 says: May 29, 2010 12:10 PM
I can’t help but laugh at some of you so-called experts who are trying to rewrite history about Russell. EVERYONE – including your precious Mayock (“JaMarcus Russell’s ceiling is as high as any quarterback I have seen coming out of college since John Elway”) raved about him before AND after the draft. They ALL said that he had the best pro day of any QB that they’ve ever seen (Yes, EVEN your precious Mayock). Most of you that claim that you knew are just plain liars but you’ll never admit that. The funny thing is that there’s this thing that they invented called the Internet that allows us to look up what all these so-called experts said and they can’t hide behind their lies.
———————————————
I call your bluff there buddy. I’m no liar. I’m record on quite a few message boards saying I didn’t think he was a first round prospect before the draft. I’m also on record showing my displeasure on those same boards, after the Raiders drafted him.
People like you don’t seem to pay attention to the whole picture. I knew who he was two years before he was drafted, and watched him play when I had a chance. I also listened to the LSU faithful express concern in his dedication to the team long before he became a Raider. There were well known issues with him long before the combine and the ND bowl game. They got brushed under the rug by a clever propaganda movement, but it almost got blown out by him showing up out of shape to the combine. Yes, he had a great pro day workout, and sadly it blinded not only people like yourself, but the so called “experts” as well.
Yes, Mayock did say Russell’s pro day was one of the best he ever saw. for some reason you choose to ignore where Mayock also said that there is a question about Russell’s dedication to football. He said it right after the Raiders rafted him. He wasn’t the only one who questioned this either, so it goes both ways there fella.
The majority thought he was going to be great. Some of us thought he wasn’t, so get over it.
]]>By: Raiders757http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632953
Sat, 29 May 2010 16:04:51 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632953I have to admit, I can’t argue with that one bit OntBoltFan. Winning on the field is where it’s at, which is something the Raiders haven’t done as of late.
]]>By: OntBoltFanhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632952
Sat, 29 May 2010 12:41:43 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632952Aside from Jmac , Al has squandered fortunes on Javon Walker, Gibril Wilson, Deangelo Hall, Randy Moss and on and on.
His moves in the past seemed out of desperation instead of any sensible planning and the result is the team reeked every year.
Winning a few court cases doesn’t distract you from this fact.
]]>By: HChttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632951
Sat, 29 May 2010 12:22:58 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632951LocoLizzard says:
May 29, 2010 3:18 AM
You know it’s sad when other fans have to come here to hate because noone has a loyal following like the Black Beast. All Raider blogs are full. You can’t say that about any other team. Right?
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Wrong.
Get over yourself. Believe it or not the world doesn’t revolve around your team. One of the biggest reasons fans of other teams hate another team, or fans of that other team, is arrogant comments like that. Plenty of other teams have just as loyal, or more loyal of a following as the Raiders, and plenty of other fan team sites are just as popular or more popular than Raider fan sites.
People are reading and commenting on the Russell case because it’s an interesting topic in the middle of the slowest part of the offseason. Trust me, it has nothing to do with how large or small or loyal a following the Raiders have.
]]>By: HChttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632950
Sat, 29 May 2010 12:11:19 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632950Raiders757 says:
May 29, 2010 2:13 AM
Does anyone ever bother to think that if the Raiders had no legal ground to take this action, they wouldn’t even bother in doing so? If they don’t the case will be dropped. If they do, I am curious as to what it is.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Agree 100%. Right now both Raider fans and Raider haters, and anyone that might be in between are all just speculating in regards to the wording of the contract.
If Davis re-worded the contract when it was renegotiated in February 2009 in such a manner that he could recover this money, then he’s a genius. Even among NFL owners, $10 million is still a whole lot of cash. And if that is the case, then Russell should turn around and sue his own lawyers that gave him the okay to re-sign that new contract for negligence and malpractice. Given where his career was at that point, the number one priority for Russell’s lawyers should have been protecting the guaranteed money.
]]>By: edgy1957http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632949
Sat, 29 May 2010 12:10:34 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632949I can’t help but laugh at some of you so-called experts who are trying to rewrite history about Russell. EVERYONE – including your precious Mayock (“JaMarcus Russell’s ceiling is as high as any quarterback I have seen coming out of college since John Elway”) raved about him before AND after the draft. They ALL said that he had the best pro day of any QB that they’ve ever seen (Yes, EVEN your precious Mayock). Most of you that claim that you knew are just plain liars but you’ll never admit that. The funny thing is that there’s this thing that they invented called the Internet that allows us to look up what all these so-called experts said and they can’t hide behind their lies.
The Raiders made their beds and now they need to lie in it and move on. Al messed up from Day 1 and he has no one else to blame but he sure as hell tries.
]]>By: AutumnWind999http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632948
Sat, 29 May 2010 11:58:04 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632948“In the end, he was cut for one reason — because he stunk. His contract contained no requirement that he not stink. The Raiders saw fit to make him the top pick in the 2007 draft, and then to give him all that money based only on potential. If anything, their effort to get money back from Russell serves only to underscore the stupidity of the decision to draft him in the first place.
But when the emperor is willing to listen to no one who might tell him he’s riding bareback with a bare butt, stuff like this tends to happen.”
——-
I love how after the fact everyone acts like they knew Russell was going to be a bust, but at the time of the 2007 draft about 90% of analysts said he should be the No. 1 pick. But now these same clowns who said to take Russell No. 1 are like “oh those crazy, silly, stubborn Raiders just don’t listen to anyone.”
If DHB turns out to be a bust I’d be fine with the media rubbing the Raiders’ faces in that one since they ripped the pick at the time. But ripping them for picking Russell is completely phony. Incidentally, the Raiders were also ripped for picking Nnamdi in the 1st round several years ago. Analysts said he was a 3rd or 4th round talent. Funny how they don’t talk much about that one now.
]]>By: the real dealhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632947
Sat, 29 May 2010 11:50:39 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632947First of all, I knew JaMarcus would be a huge bust and predicted it! I have always said how terrible Culpepper is and how over-rated Fatpepper was, And how J-fatass Russell was a poor mans Culstinker, and since Culstinky was already amongst the worst, it was obvious J-fatass would stink too….
Forget the media hype you fools, go spend some time in Vegas and you will realize anyone with cash, and who knows the game always knew Culstench was horrid,
Also I think J-fatass should pay Lane Kiffin the money Kiffin is due, and with the left over cash throw himself a biggest bust in the history of the world party……
]]>By: Raiders757http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632946
Sat, 29 May 2010 11:34:37 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632946# The Black Cat says: May 28, 2010 10:41 PM
I had Jamarcus pegged as a bust the second after Oakland drafted him. I just didn’t realize he’d be so good at being a bust!
————————————————–
I had him pegged a a bust before the draft. I was pissed when Al drafted him. Word out of LSU was that he had to be pushed and propped up by the coaches and the team. He was considered a third round prospect until the hype machine took hold. Still, the so called “experts” had him pegged as a top five pick right before the draft, so it’s funny reading all the comments by the Raider bashing idiot convention. Most of these chumps probably thought Russell was a going to be a great QB when he was drafted, so they have no room to talk.
@ Steve W: Since you think you know so much about Russell’s contract, I would assume you’ve actually read it? Can you send all of us a copy so we can make our own assumption as well? Like I mentioned mid page. I am sure there is something the Raiders lawyers have seen, that makes them think they have a case. Considering they know more about these things than you, Florio, and Jason Cole combined, I’ll take their word over yours.
@ Junior: You are correct, but all the Raider hating morons refuse to learn the facts when it comes to Al Davis and Shanahan. It just doesn’t fit their agenda to know the truth. Every time one of them brings the Shanahan non-issue up, it proves just how stupid they really are, and how little they dig for details. They’re sheep, who buy into anything their told.
Same with the Kiffin situation. The Raiders don’t owe him a dime. He was fired for cause, which negates the contract and anything he was owed.
]]>By: BUNYANhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632945
Sat, 29 May 2010 10:32:36 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632945Unless you have read the actual contract, you can not say that the Raiders chances of recovering $9.55 million dollars from Russell are slim. Davis is not stupid and he would not bother filing a grievance if he thought he had little chance of winning. I hope he gets back as much cash as he can from Russell.
]]>By: BUNYANhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632944
Sat, 29 May 2010 10:26:02 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632944In hind sight the Raiders were stupid to draft Russell. However, they were not stupid to draft Russell at the time of the 2007 draft. Almost all of the experts had Russell as the best quarterback in the draft. Mel Kiper had him as the 4th best player in the entire draft. We all know that there are no guarantees that any player will turn out to be great after they are drafted. What is ridiculous is for you to call the Raiders stupid for drafting the no.1 rated quarterback in the 2007 draft. In hind sight they made the wrong decision, but not at the time of the draft. All NFL teams have made poor choices with thei draft picks over the years. It’s a crap shoot.
]]>By: Juniorhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632943
Sat, 29 May 2010 10:24:11 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632943You fools can argue over who thought Russell would be a bust and who didn’t all you want. The fact remains that if it wasn’t the Raiders who drafted Russell, it would have been the Browns at #3. The Browns have said as much.
And leave Shanahan out of your “Al has a history…” diatribes. You obviously don’t know what you’re talking about and are just spouting what you’ve heard in the past. Davis doesn’t owe Shanahan crap. Davis gave Shanahan a loan based on future earnings, it had nothing to do with the contract or guarantees what so ever. As didn’t pay rat face because rat face never paid back the loan.
]]>By: NFLMMAfanhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632942
Sat, 29 May 2010 10:04:54 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632942@ Steve W.
You seem to be a bright guy but have you personally read JaMarcus contract? And the ammendment?
Don’t underestimate Al’s determination to punish JaMarcus for being a total dick and not really showing up for work.
]]>By: poonhokhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632941
Sat, 29 May 2010 09:03:58 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632941There were numerous indications that Russell was lazy and not very smart.
No scout was going to push the issue for fear of being called racist.
Russell has singlehandedly destroyed the fantasy of the “athletic” Quarterback being a success in the NFL….
]]>By: Rastahttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632940
Sat, 29 May 2010 09:00:17 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632940Jerry needs to take Al’s lead and get all his money back for “OL’ ROY”
]]>By: alewatcherhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632939
Sat, 29 May 2010 08:58:11 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632939# Steve W. says: May 29, 2010 4:37 AM
# I MURDER HOES/187403 says: May 28, 2010 10:29 PM
Whoever was picking first WAS picking Russell. 10-2 his junior year and threw over 3000yds 28tds 8int. Even blew out ND in the Sugar Bowl. Had a decent combine, shit even had THE average wonderlic score for a QB (24).
There was nothing to indicate, Jamarcus would turn out to be a bust at the age of 24. He even could be out of football after barely playing 3 years of it and pocketing nearly 40mil. The Raiders didn’t help the cause much by having internal turmoil but if you’re even a lil bit dedicated, you would fare better than Jamarcus.
Who foresaw him being a sloth?
______________________________
Nothing indicating he’d be a bust? I remember hearing people question his work ethic and training routine before the draft. Mayock especially had his doubts about that.
————————-
Exactly right. Mike Mayock said outright that the only thing standing in Russell’s way was Russell himself. JaCarcus has the talent, but once he got paid, any effort on his part to learn his craft was gone.
]]>By: Trips Right, 68 Slant, D Slanthttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632938
Sat, 29 May 2010 08:47:14 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632938Shazam!!
You fiends can not get enough of that Silver & Black dick.
I know…. They say “once you go……… you can never go…….”
Chuckle…..
Have a nice miserable time watching us host the 2010 playoffs (yes Jim E. Mora…. playoffs).
‘Nation……
]]>By: Schnitzelhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632937
Sat, 29 May 2010 08:38:00 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632937It is not only my hope that Jamarcus Russell wins this lawsuit but he counter sues Al Davis & the Raiders for Job Related Stress from working in the hostile work environment called the Raiders.
This is just what the league needs an owner who believes guaranteed money is not guaranteed. Why should any player sign a contract with guaranteed money that the team can claw back? Al Davis is not only incompetent in his old age he is also foolish.
]]>By: MosesZDhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632936
Sat, 29 May 2010 08:27:25 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632936“Florio, none of the draft numbnuts had Russell labeled as future bust. ”
WRONG. He was labeled fat and uninterested in football showing a decided lack of work ethic. Anybody stupid enough to throw money at a pig should expect those results…
]]>By: I_Hate_Yamshttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632935
Sat, 29 May 2010 08:21:00 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632935As a Charger fan, I want to sue to get Russell back on the Raider roster and under center for the first snap in the first game.
]]>By: steelerfan9598http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632934
Sat, 29 May 2010 08:16:14 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632934They blew the pick, he blew the money. End of story.
]]>By: Terryhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632933
Sat, 29 May 2010 07:49:34 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632933They probably filed the grievance hoping that Russell will simply walk away from the 3 Mill. thats still owed him for 2010, though they don’t have a leg to stand on.
]]>By: rangersleadthewayhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632932
Sat, 29 May 2010 07:38:46 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632932rjgreen3 says:
May 28, 2010 10:21 PM
the nfl should file a law suit against the raiders for being sooo damn dumb……lmfao!!!!!!!!!!
———————————
um.. dude.. this wasn’t that funny…
]]>By: Big Texhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/28/raiders-seem-to-have-a-flimsy-case-against-jamarcus-russell/#comment-632931
Sat, 29 May 2010 07:30:07 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76657#comment-632931Al can whine and sue all he wants. Russell’s lawyers will show the tape of Al standing next to his overhead projector talking about what a great QB Jamarcus is going to be and about how Kiffin needs to “get over it”. Then they will shut up, sit down, and Al will lose.
]]>