Friday, August 16, 2013

Why is Manmohan Singh so desperate to appease Pakistan?

Army chief Bikram Singh pays last tribute to jawans killed by Pakistani soldiers

A feckless Prime Minister can only be expected to cut corners
with India's interest and security. But that does not mean we should let
Manmohan Singh do so unchallenged and unquestioned

The outpouring of rage across the country after Pakistani soldiers
sneaked across the Line of Control in the Poonch sector and ambushed an
Indian Army post, killing five jawans, earlier this week, could have
only been missed by a criminally callous Government like the one which
currently presides over India’s steady but steep decline and decay.
Hence it’s not surprising that Defence Minister AK Antony stumbled so
badly in articulating the UPA’s response to the dastardly deed by
Pakistan in our Parliament.
Instead of pinning the responsibility for the murder of our soldiers on
Pakistan, Antony first sought to absolve those guilty of the crime by
describing them as “persons in Pakistani Army uniform”. It is now
believed the Defence Minister’s statement, which marked a sharp
departure from the Defence Department’s statement blaming the Pakistani
Army, was vetted and cleared by the National Security Adviser and senior
officials of the Ministry of External Affairs. That followed their
meeting with diplomats of the Pakistani High Commission in New Delhi who
had been ostensibly summoned to South Block to register India’s
protest.
We will never know what prompted the Prime Minister’s Office and the
Ministry of External Affairs to rush to Pakistan’s aid and put a gloss
over its crime. Friends in the Ministry of External Affairs who are
appalled by the Government offering an escape route to Pakistan say
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is desperate to broker ‘peace’ at any
cost, even if it means cutting corners with India’s national interest.
The reasons for this desperation are no secret. Manmohan Singh believes
that if he tries hard enough, he can secure the Nobel Prize for Peace.
For that he needs the US’s endorsement. The US, in turn, wants him to
turn a Nelson’s eye to Pakistan’s offences and accept Islamabad’s terms
for a rapprochement, no matter how tenuous that may be. Pakistan,
meanwhile, has let it be known that it shall persist with its policy of
inflicting a thousand cuts and India could either take it or leave it.
Manmohan Singh, clearly, is more than willing to take it if it means a
pat on the back by US President Barack Obama and an invitation to the
glittering Nobel ceremony to collect this year’s Peace Prize.
For a man whose inaction, chicanery and incompetence has dragged
India’s economy back to the pre-1990s (Morgan Stanley says this year’s
growth could be as low as 3.5 per cent) and whose crafty pandering to
crass minorityism to keep his political boss (Congress president and NAC
chairperson Sonia Gandhi) happy has caused buried communal fault lines
to resurface, this is the only road to securing a place in history.
Little does he realise that once he demits office, which he will have
to, he shall be reduced to no more than a footnote of history, a
reminder that India was misgoverned by a gang of thieves for nine years
with Manmohan Singh playing Ali Baba.
Yet he persists in search of the proverbial ‘sim-sim’, the magic code
that will allow him entry to the world of immortality. If that means the
truth should be subverted and national security compromised, if it
requires playing fast and loose with India’s pride and dignity, he is
game. We have seen this in the past too —when he travelled to Havana and
declared, along with General Pervez Musharraf, that Pakistan is not the
tormentor and perpetrator of terror as Indians believe it is, but a
victim of terror; when he agreed to the shameful joint statement
dictated by Yousuf Raza Gilani, then Prime Minister of Pakistan, and
issued from Sharm el-Sheikh; when he slyly bypassed the national
consensus that there should be no talks with Pakistan till it brings the
masterminds of the 26/11 Mumbai carnage to book; when he allowed
Pakistani Ministers and officials to pour scorn and ridicule on India
while standing on Indian soil. The tailoring of the Defence Minister’s
statement is, therefore, understandable, as is the rush to whitewash
Pakistan’s sin.
Thankfully, an alert Opposition spotted the difference and the BJP
pilloried the Government till it ate crow and the Defence Minister made a
second statement, this time accusing “specialist troops” of the
Pakistani Army for the killings: “We all know nothing happens along the
Line of Control without the support... direct involvement of the
Pakistani Army,” he added for good measure. The revised statement
followed reports, planted (or leaked, as some would prefer) by
‘sources’, that Sonia Gandhi was mighty displeased with the Government
for playing ducks and drakes.
A revised statement implicating Pakistan directly for the killing of
our jawans, however, does not mean corrective action on the policy
front. It was expected that Manmohan Singh would, in the least, call off
his scheduled meeting with Nawaz Sharif in New York in late September
when he is there for the United Nations General Assembly’s annual
jamboree. It was also expected that the Foreign Secretary-level talks,
which had been put on hold after the brutal slaying of two Indian jawans
(one of them was beheaded; the other disfigured) by Pakistani soldiers
at Mendhar, will remain off the radar for the foreseeable future.
But no, that’s not happening. We are told Manmohan Singh will meet
Nawaz Sharif in New York and the Foreign Secretary-level talks will
resume next month. After he meets Nawaz Sharif, Manmohan Singh will
travel to Washington, DC to meet Barack Obama. Is one predicated on the
other? The answer to that question is obvious: The Americans want us to
carry the can for Pakistan, never mind the cost to India, as they
prepare to exit from Afghanistan. Predictably, Manmohan Singh is more
than happy to play ball with the Americans.
The alternative to the craven approach adopted by Manmohan Singh (he
can’t stand up and be counted either at home or abroad) is not to go to
war with Pakistan, as is mockingly and jeeringly suggested by his
flag-wavers, especially in media. Nor is it to halt all interaction with
Pakistan. It is to adopt a calibrated approach, making it abundantly
clear to both Islamabad and Rawalpindi that every cut inflicted on India
comes attached with a price to be paid by Pakistan. We could start
getting there by insisting that if Pakistan wishes to talk, it should
agree to joint secretary-level dialogue which would be restricted to
comparing notes and no more.
That, however, would require guts. And a Prime Minister who is not as
feckless as Manmohan Singh. Unfortunately, for the moment we are stuck
with him. All that we can do is raise our voice and say ‘No’ to him. He
is unlikely to listen, but at least our conscience would be clear.

3 comments:

Anonymous
said...

Kanchanji, I cannot help but wonder at the motivation behind this post. Did Anthony's statement match that of the Army? No, it did not, and it should have: but why does that mean he is whitewashing the crime? Anthony spoke of "persons in Pakistani uniform" rahter than Pakistani Soldiers. All this says is that we do not have enough information to pin those murders on the Pakistani high command. Or have you forgotten that militants attack the LoC as well? Your invective against the Congress notwithstanding, would you have the guts to make an unconfirmed statement about Pakistani soldiers to parliament, I wonder.

I do not expect you to post this comment, right-wingers rarely welcome critique. I hope you bloody well read it, though.

The complications of the situation in Pakistan are well known. The Government has very little hold over the hawkish, US backed army, and holding the one accountable for the other's actions is difficult if we want real progress in the negotiations. If we wish to hold anybody accountable at all, it should be the US army, for pushing Rawalpindi into getting so cosy with militants.Yusuf Raza Gilani and Manmohan made the first significant steps toward peace in a long while, despite the invective hurled at them by you, your friends, and your counterparts on the Pakistani side of the border (for you can be sure that Gilani heard the same accusations you are making about Manmohan). If anybody had any genuine desire for peace rather than plain one-upmanship, they would hold a referendum in Kashmir (ALL of Kashmir) and abide by the ruling. They would roll back the special powers given to the army in the state. They would compensate the victims of the violence Kashmir has witnessed. Manmohan, for all his flaws, came a SIGHT closer to doing so than your erstwhile employers.

We respond rather poorly to provocations, I admit. Pakistan and China have turned provoking reactions from other countries into a high art form.

The way I see it, such a set of provocations, if planned by Pakistan, are just a way to get the United States to commit more strongly to the region. When the United States leaves Afghanistan, Pakistan's source of slush money is going to dry up. Keeping the region unstable is an excellent way to ensure a continued US presence- and US aid.

That being said, I see no point in complaining about Dr. Singh's performance. His lack of political power has been evident for years on end.

Twitter Updates

Do you support India's vote against Israel at Unesco?

Featured post

Our fraudulent Left-liberals, who dominate the commentariat and academic institutions, poisoning impressionable minds, are out in full f...

Kolkata

Trincas at Park Street.

Take 1

Quick Comment

Take 2

Koko fooling around

Take 3

Quote of the Day

"The newspapers attacking me are not newspapers in the ordinary sense. They are engines of propaganda for the constantly changing policies, desires, personal vices, personal likes and dislikes of the two men. What are their methods? Their methods are direct falsehoods, misrepresentation, half-truths, the alteration of the speaker's meaning by publishing a sentence apart from the context...What the proprietorship of these papers is aiming at is power, and power without responsibility – the prerogative of the harlot throughout the ages."