Now turn those 2 numbers into a % and tell me it's more than a few % at most

It isn't about Sharia law, it's about Muslims being terrorists

Or shall we bring up what the bible teaches us ?

But wait, none of those lines count, because you're all so arbitrary when it comes to cherry picking what suits you out of a book supposedly written
from the word of the ONE TRUE GOD

You all put your faith in a book yet deny whatever is in your book that makes you feel uncomfortable, so don't make out like Islam is a problem
because of certain lines you've seen online without even reading the book or doing any research.

Do you not understand ? You're being socially engineered, from the BS you read online to the BS you read in those god awful books written by men
representing the word of God (yes this applies to Muslims too)

a reply to: Discotech
I think there are between 1.2 and 1.6 billion Muslims on this planet. (Edit - Google tells me 1.5bill).

100% of them believe forcing a woman to cover up is acceptable in the modern world - I include the women in that, which is an example of brainwashing
(another subject).

Supporting ISIS does not identify extremism. Extremism is rooted in behaviour and beliefs. If only 5% want to enact a strict Sharia law (which I would
definitely say is extreme, very extreme) then that makes 60 million at the lowest estimate.

Back to your request again - there are 190million people in Pakistan. 98% are Muslim - 28% support ISIS - THAT'S 52 MILLION PEOPLE!!! Source is
linked in my post on the first page.

That's a hell of a lot of bad apples roaming the planet.

I am not of any faith or religion, yet, I understand that this can change. I think if I were to follow a faith it would have to be based around
treating all humans with love. Even women!

a reply to: Discotech
I can't answer that first question, I don't think the stats are available, however the link posted by the member above -
this link. is shocking to me. 519 killed in Islamic terrorist attacks since May 26
2017.

You're right, there are A holes everywhere, part of every group.

It is clear though that the Islamic terrorists are not just a scapegoat, there are a massive amount of extremists, as demonstrated by the link above
and the wars in the Middle East.

It goes deeper though, for two reasons. The first is anecdotal so I will not dwell on it - but it is basically a lot of first hand accounts of
barbaric behaviour found in rural parts of Middle East countries - Iraq, Afghanistan - they are a whole different world which I can only begin to
imagine, a white man could not walk freely in these areas. But that's anecdotal and the only sources are Youtube videos of ex soldiers etc.

The second reason - it is deeper than just terrorism, like what I allude to earlier - the foundations of Islam, no matter how 'mild' of form are in my
opinion inherently morally wrong. Their views on women, their techniques of punishment, their belief that there is no separation between religion and
state - that is very dangerous.

How do we solve the problem? No idea. One thing we need to do is stop making the problem worse. Put sanctions on the companies buying oil from ISIS.
Maybe ask Israel to stop giving aid to ISIS!!! etc etc

Kahn, and people who think like them, are locked in the superstition that words cause violence, and therefor shutup. Actually, people are led by the
content of their beliefs—in this case Islam—to commit violence.

originally posted by: and14263
as demonstrated by the link above and the wars in the Middle East.

Wars that we (the West) either started or covertly funded, let's not make out that we're innocent in all of this. ISIS would not be around had the
Mujahideen not been funded and trained in the 80's to turn into Al Qaeda which allowed us to create power vacuums in the middle East which those too
extreme for Al Qaeda and were pushed out decided to form what we now have as ISIS who not only managed to form their makeshift caliphate in Iraq &
Syria thanks out meddling but also managed to grab a piece of Libya, again thanks to our meddling and also grab bits of Egypt and Somalia too,
again... thanks to us. It's our own leaders who helped create this bogeyman we know as ISIS.

The second reason - it is deeper than just terrorism, like what I allude to earlier - the foundations of Islam, no matter how 'mild' of form are in my
opinion inherently morally wrong. Their views on women, their techniques of punishment, their belief that there is no separation between religion and
state - that is very dangerous.

And therein lies the problem we cannot go after their religious beliefs for fear of it being open season on all religious beliefs and would likely
result in the holy war to end all wars with one religion finally being dominant.

The ironic thing being that even after that was done, you'd still find people becoming extremist and resorting to killing others to make a statement,
because our society will still be bad.

I have one solution, which I know for a fact would work, but nobody thinks it's possible. We change our piece of sh#t society and work to improve
ourselves as a race of humans instead of all separately working on our own selfish individuals goals and bank balances.

a reply to: Discotech
You're right and I'm still trying to learn the real reason 'we' started all this and continue to enable the jihadist armies. It is intriguing to me
that Israel has never been attacked, in fact when ISIS accidentally attacked Israel forces they said sorry! Very interesting

Your last statement sums it up. The fact that we are human is our downfall. There will always be lunatics, there will always be people who value the
material over the immaterial. I believe your solution will work - but the shift/change in society would be epic, massive, huge.... Economy, education,
health care, morals, money/trading, crime and punishment - all are wrong IMHO. I'd prefer a locally governed village over a nationally governed
country.

I agree apart from locally governed villages, it's clear throughout our history we are all separately drawn to different "tribes" what we need to do
is unite us all together as one single tribe, as crazy as it sounds I'm in favour of a one world government, currency and universal laws and standards
we're all equally held accountable by. I honestly think it's the only way we can put our differences aside if we're all in the same boat so to
speak.

As for nations not being attacked, there's actually a lot, you don't hear of problems in South America or in Japan or even Poland, China I'm not so
sure I know they have a Muslim problem (they think it's a problem) but I'm sure they've not been attacked either so it's strange. Iceland is another
one, but they're pretty chill I couldn't imagine anyone wanting to attack Iceland, they even jail the bad bankers over there

What I also find strange is the coordination or lack of coordination of these attacks, ever since 9/11 and the first UK attack, we've not seen another
well coordinated attack, it's always been one spot at one time, I ask why ? Surely if your aim is create terror you attack multiple locations at once
to create as much mass panic and confusion as possible, really stretch the police and ambulances etc to their limits with multiple attacks in
different location. Also why are the likes of Bradford, Leeds, Birmingham and Liverpool not attacked in the UK ? Bradford and Birmingham have a very
high Muslim population and Birmingham is our second largest city

Let's not be silly now, I'm in favour of a peaceful transition to a single world government and system, not one that is forced upon people with blood
and destruction. It's why I don't agree with the NWO stuff, everybody has to be willing or it doesn't happen, if anybody dies, then it's off the
table.

And it should be about bringing us together as a species, not as control as most would prefer it

Let's not be silly now, I'm in favour of a peaceful transition to a single world government and system, not one that is forced upon people with blood
and destruction. It's why I don't agree with the NWO stuff, everybody has to be willing or it doesn't happen, if anybody dies, then it's off the
table.

And it should be about bringing us together as a species, not as control as most would prefer it

There is no such thing as a peaceful transition to a world government. As ISIS is showing, it is achieved through genocide and forced conversion.

In 2016, Prime Minister David Cameron was widely criticized in the UK when he claimed that London mayor Sadiq Khan had ties to the terror group
ISIS. An investigation by Disobedient Media has determined that Khan has ties not just to organizations associated with ISIS, but also groups such as
Hamas, Al-Nusra, Al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood. During his time as mayor, London has seen an increase in terror incidents with concerning
indications that terror groups wish to stage a major attack on the City of London. Rather than focusing on combatting terror, Khan has used his
forum to tell Londoners as well as citizens in other parts of Europe and the United States that the West must learn to live with terrorism as a part
of daily life. Khan’s extreme flirtation with radical Islamic extremism raises serious questions about his commitment to fighting a wave of
extremist fueled terrorism that only continues to spread after a number of attacks and police operations in London and other areas of the
UK.

The article continues into specific examples of the mayor's questionable ties and activities to Muslim extremists.

Again, I cannot vouch for the reliability of the source, but it's clear you obviously aren't the only one questioning the mayor.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.