I'm sorry, but I think it's pathetic that BJ's gettign an immediate rematch. That's incredibly disrespectful to Edgar! They're essentially saying "that win doesn't really count because it was just a fluke!" Time and again Edgar was in...landed his punches...and was out before BJ could do much of anything!...and let's nto forget that Edgar scored takedowns on a guy that is extremely difficult to put on the ground.

NO ONE should get an immediate rematch after losing the belt (unless it's some genuine freak occurence like when Couture got his eyelid cut open). BJ should have to win two fights before he gets another title shot. Not doing so not only disrespects Edgar, but everyone else in the devision.

I also don't agree that Maynard doesn't deserve a shot. Granted, some of his wins have not come in the most exciting fashion, but they're wins. No way someone who suffured a loss in his last fight should jump ahead of someone who's clealry put the time in and strung together a succession of wins.

Why Griffin? If anyone should get a title shot before Penn it should be Maynard. Maynard is the only person to beat Edgar and has yes to lose in the UFC. Griffin is only on a 2 fight win streak, why should he even be mentioned in the title picture?

Why Griffin? If anyone should get a title shot before Penn it should be Maynard. Maynard is the only person to beat Edgar and has yes to lose in the UFC. Griffin is only on a 2 fight win streak, why should he even be mentioned in the title picture?

Maynard should have even won his last decision! and Griffin is a little like Frankie Edgar...the two are know for taking names they shouldnt be able to beat.