Welcome to the WetCanvas forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit our help center.

In preparing to teach workshops, and in general wondering how people would classify things, just wondering if we similarly agree that certain subject matter or techniques fit in to similar ability groups.

Now this is in regards to your experience and expertise as an artist. Remember when you first started what was simple and what was more complex. Now as an intermediate or advanced artist what is difficult or challenging but achievable to you but would be beyond the ability of a beginner.

This question is more in regards to painting.

My viewpoint is this -please feel free to add to these categories or change what you would fit where. Bear in my things categorised are determined on a general level or ability of standard achievement -so think about how you would 'grade' a bunch of students into categories; beginner students will exhibit similar skills compared to advanced students.

I'm considering organising art classes myself, so this is something I've also been thinking about.

It depends upon context of course, but I'm not sure I agree with your reasoning, e.g. that still life is easy and portraiture is hard, or that photorealism is harder than cubism? Maybe still life and cubism just appear slightly easier to get away with if they don't go quite right?!!

If I was to go back in time and have a proper art education, other than the one I had, I'd say that beginners should be taught foundations: observation, value, composition, perspective, proportion, etc and how to develop an 'eye'.

Intermediate would be doing the foundations well and getting good 'standard' results whatever the subject matter and learning some advanced techniques .

Advanced students would be masters of the basics and not only getting excellent results but adding their own flare or personality.

My concern with grading subjects rather than tools/techniques in order of difficulty is be that it might tend towards learning based on formula rather than observation; it's the difference between being given a fish or a fishing rod.