Would you like more of PEP’s content in your own language? We encourage you to talk with your country’s Psychoanalytic Journals and tell them about PEP Web.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Tuckett, D. (2000). Theoretical Pluralism and the Construction of Psychoanalytic Knowledge. Changing Ideas In A Changing World: The Revolution in Psychoanalysis. Essays in Honour of Arnold Cooper, 237-246.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:

Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here. Once there, click the 'Forgotten Username/Password' button, fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please click here for customer support information.

Tuckett, D. (2000). Theoretical Pluralism and the Construction of Psychoanalytic Knowledge. Changing Ideas In A Changing World: The Revolution in Psychoanalysis. Essays in Honour of Arnold Cooper, 237-246

Theoretical Pluralism and the Construction of Psychoanalytic Knowledge

David Tuckett, M. Sc.

More than a hundred years after its foundation, what psychoanalysis is, what a psychoanalytic treatment is, and how and on whom it works are very much in doubt, within the discipline and without. When spelled out in detail, few psychoanalytic propositions are treated consen-sually, even among psychoanalysts, as having a value as “real” in the sense that to ignore them is consequential. Nor are they agreed as useful truths, so that they necessarily limit the scope for competing beliefs and constitute a secure fund of knowledge from which any other proposition must take off.

As an example, the central concept of transference is a subject for dispute, being visited and re-visited with little clear consensus. Other key concepts for some — for instance, the therapeutic alliance, the castration complex, or the après coup — are almost irrelevant to others. Indeed, my impression (see also Hamilton, 1993; Schafer, 1983) is that few psychoanalysts would confidently feel able to set out a list of the core propositions of the discipline as a whole and at the same time expect, on close inspection and definition, close associates in their own country, let alone more distant colleagues, to agree.

Several questions seem pertinent.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]