ExpandCollapse

EDF Elite

Man, if only we could finally solve this bigotry problem. Some kinda...Last Resolution? Ultimate Conclusion?

Admittedly, I see where this idea comes from. 'It's okay to advocate for violence against people for their ideas...when said ideas involve violence against people based on immutable things (race, gender, etc).' Since they're choosing to advocate for violence and persecution, the only response would naturally be to rebuff those statements and return their intent on them before they get a chance to enact. And while yes, this would likely solve that problem and deter future attempts, it can do the exact opposite. See, by making someone out to be an enemy, and then persecuting them as such, and upholding generalized beliefs (all X are Y), then naturally, many X will become wary and fear for their safety and seek strength in numbers for protection. It's part of why a lot of this Islamic hysteria is probably driving more people to ISIS out of recognition that there is some sort of war on Islam, and it's definitely why there's a growing subsection of conservatives/alt-right what have you founded on the perceived persecution from the so-called SJW gospel (Die Cis Scum and whatnot).

You've got groups that are being genuinely shit(if inactive about their preaching in Spencer's case), and then those that are being actively shit by attacking them, and those being inactively shit are martyred while the actively shit are either burned or bolstered by it. As a result both sides have their ideologies confirmed and redouble their beliefs. Fucking perfect powderkeg in the making, and it seems as though those left-leaning are oblivious to it, while the other side is well aware and almost banking on it. The best way to describe the left is not "tolerant" so much as intolerant to intolerance. Which, again, is slightly better than the hypocrisy it sounds like because their intolerance is to others' beliefs, which are in themselves intolerant.

And then there's Dobson, the fucking cheerleader. Doing nothing but adding another "woo", preaching to the choir.

ExpandCollapse

Ediot

Of course Dobson won't look up the stats to see how many of the "refugees" are actually women and children, that would shatter his narrative. And since he lives in Minnesota, maybe he should go hang with any "refugees" placed there so he can tell them how much he feels their pain.

ExpandCollapse

has no title

Of course Dobson won't look up the stats to see how many of the "refugees" are actually women and children, that would shatter his narrative. --

Click to expand...

Here (in Finland) it's 70-90% men.
And it's likely closer to 90 since a lot of them lied about their age so they were considered "children", and minors' genders weren't mentioned. According to some age testing 60% of the tested minors were actually adults.

When there was protests against immigration (or rather, current immigration laws and how lax they are) there were people with signs that said, "women and children welcome" but the protesters were painted as nazis and racists anyway. People in general would be fine with immigration if the laws were more sensible (so that they wouldn't let in mass murderers and war criminals only to realize it way later - again) and women and children were priorized before men and if immigrants who commit serious crimes were banished.

But whatever.
dobson's actually become an even worse person now that he's been taken so deep into sjw stuff, before he was just bitter and obnoxious even if he's always had these leanings.

ExpandCollapse

has no title

I mean, that sort of format is usually poorly used, it works when the character's speech is actually trailing and somewhat incoherent or something like that.
But dobson has the most boring formatting and it never conveys anything nor adds anything. Even children use more esperimental, expressive and meaningful choices in theirs.
Why can't he ever direct his criticism at himself instead?