By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to LI' below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.

Yes, it is not and therefore the conclusion drawn by Karma (identifying the reason for this exit) is flawed. I would rather side with Ricky on this exit (see comment below). I think it might also be that Dwivedi had always been with LL and KLAW, so its fair to have a bit of fascination about big brands, which coupled with small firm issues could have triggered the exit.

Well firms and their priorities. LL was focussing on Siddharth as their insolvency spearhead, so Anurag may have felt left out. This is not unusual in firms. But this should be done in a more open, planned and transparent manner with partner feedback from managing committees. This has happened at other firms and other partners at LL too. LL will need to assess whether it needs its 4+0.5 Delhi top equity partners team to dominate everything in the firm or wants other partners to grow or not. Good thing is that LL top guys Sharma & Srivastava are very sharp, am sure they will fix things in near future.All the best too Anurag. He is a fine lawyer.

Well if the C Suite guy takes the credit for growth in numbers and billing (It was all Anand's hard work and initiative in getting the work horses in 2015) then he must take the blame for all exits. [...] amazing how sharmaji's stated objective of making the firm a great place to work and [...] is pulling the firm in opposite direction.