giro-X wrote:
On the other side, I believe the best strategy would be to focus on one or two games at a time, instead of trying to submit for all the 6 of them together at any time: you start with easier games, and leave for last those where you need more training.

That's what I actually thought when the "6 games / 6 weeks" formula were voted.....I mean...I expected to see a game revealed each week....this together with the multiplier idea in calculating scores whould have had more sense....players have to concentrate in one game only as it goes out, although they may still submit scores in the following weeks...
Hope this one falls in the "Constructive criticism" category as well....

Although, revealing one every week like you said, would mean a game gets played 6 weeks, one 5 weeks, etc. and one for a week only. And then, with which criterium we decide which game should get more dedication?
Not sure it would work.
Besides, let's take this big experiment as a lesson that sometimes common methods are better.

Not complaining at all. I love the formula with all scores awarding points based on the % to first place. This means you dont necessarily have to beat a score but can at least compete with top scores and still be awarded appropriate points based on your performance. Doing a great job. Just my thoughts from a player's perspective.

Dax wrote:Not complaining at all. I love the formula with all scores awarding points based on the % to first place. This means you dont necessarily have to beat a score but can at least compete with top scores and still be awarded appropriate points based on your performance. Doing a great job. Just my thoughts from a player's perspective.

Me neither I'm complaining...the % scoring system is fine (in the far past, I encouraged an alternative leaderboard, based on a similar scoring system)....just trying to give suggestions....

giro-X wrote:Although, revealing one every week like you said, would mean a game gets played 6 weeks, one 5 weeks, etc. and one for a week only. And then, with which criterium we decide which game should get more dedication?
Not sure it would work.
Besides, let's take this big experiment as a lesson that sometimes common methods are better.

Good point, Luke....do you think a game per week (keeping somehow the multiplier scoring system) would work better ...?!

The ranking is permanently available at this URL: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing
I didn't upload the video that captured the random extraction of games, though I have it still saved on my HDD. If anyone is interested to view it for the sake of regularity, please send me a message (preferably a private message in this forum) so I will upload it to Dropbox and send you link.