HIS Radeon 6850 ICEQ X Turbo review -
The GPU - Barts

Let's meet Bart ...

Both cards released in the Radeon HD 6800 range are based on what is now know as the GPU codenamed 'Barts'. The cards deriving from it are in fact segmented into mid-range, not high-end as many people expected. So yeah, the best has still to come. The reason? AMD needed to clean up some numbering as a lot of new products in the fusion line will eat away the lower segment of the numbering scheme.

The Radeon HD 6800 segments itself in the mid-range market, whereas the Radeon HD 5800 series is updated with the Radeon HD 6900 (Cayman) series, with a dual-GPU part named Radeon HD 6900 (Antilles), I can't say it often enough to make this clear I guess.

So that is certainly something to think about, as the naming scheme has changed. Also, why did AMD start with the Radeon HD 6850 and 6870 and not 6900 you might ask. Well, obviously it's easier for AMD to release a slightly lower spec GPU but more importantly, currently the only product that really bothers AMD is NVIDIA's lovely GeForce GTX 460 (GF104). This is a very successful product for which AMD does not have a good answer, as such there's a gap in their product line-up and that gap needs to be filled up first.

Within it's own lineup the Radeon HD 6850 will be faster than the Radeon HD 5830 and the Radeon HD 6870 will be faster than the Radeon HD 5850, but not faster than the 5870. The Radeon HD 6870 will be a pure reference product, while the Radeon HD 6850 comes in many custom designs and boards. In the end it will be all about pricing of course.

Let's have a quick comparative overview of some of the specifications representing a certain cope of mid-range performance reference products

Specifications

Radeon HD 5770

Radeon HD 5850

Radeon HD 6850

Radeon HD 6870

GPU

Juniper XT

Cypress Pro

Barts Pro

Barts XT

Manufact. tech.

40nm

40 nm

40nm

40nm

GPU frequency

850 MHz

725 MHz

775 MHz

900 MHz

Stream processors

800

1440

960

1120

Memory frequency

4800 MHz

4000 MHz

4000 MHz

4200 MHz

Memory bus

128-bit

256-bit

256-bit

256-bit

Memory buffer

1 GB GDDR5

1 GB GDDR5

1 GB GDDR5

1 GB GDDR5

Power consumption

108 watt

151 watt

~ 127 watt

>150 watt

Performance

-

-

Faster than 5830

Faster than 5850

So each of the two R6800 SKUs has a separate codename, the R6850 being Barts Pro and the 6870 being the Barts XT. We'll leave the entire codename thing for what it is now and move a little onward into the architecture.

Both cards are of course updated DX11 class products with a couple of new features. Armed with 1.7 billion transistors the Radeon HD 6850 is pitted against the competition's GeForce GTX 460 768MB model, the 6850 which is clocked at 775 MHz on it's core and shader processors domain and comes with a full GB of graphics memory. This memory is 256-bit and running at an effective data-rate of 4000 MHz.

The product has 12 SIMD clusters, 48 texture units, 960 shader processors, 32 ROPs and a TDP of 127W, 19W in idle. Despite the memory bus, you can recognize similarities close to the R5770 here. This product however will bring you 1.5 TFLOPS of performance, and combined with that 256-bit gDDR5 memory it will leave the R5770 far behind it.

Pitted against the GeForce GTX 460 1GB version is the Radeon HD 6870, and this is going to be the more interesting product for most of Guru3D's readers we suspect. As you noticed the overall shader count and clock frequencies are higher than earlier leaked rumors, that applies to the R6870 as well.

The 6870 is clocked a good chunk faster at a nice 900 MHz, and also comes with a full GB of graphics memory. This memory is 256-bit and running at an effective data-rate of 4200 MHz with a peak bandwidth at 134 GB/sec. The product has 14 SIMD clusters, 56 texture units, 1120 shader processors, 32 ROPs and a TDP slightly above 150W with a 19W idle TDP. This product will bring you 2.0 TFLOPS of performance. This means that performance wise the R6870 will sit in-between a R5850 and 5870.

Features wise both graphics cards will be very similar to the last generation products and are merely an advanced update. However there are some new features, like DisplayPort now follows 1.2 interface specification, HD3D, UVD3 and HDMI 1.4a are introduced. We also spot a new Anti-aliasing mode (Morphological AA), better Anisotropic filtering and improved Tessellation performance - up to twice the performance of that of the 5000 series.

HIS Radeon R9-290X Hybrid ICEQ reviewIn this review we will benchmark and test HIS Radeon R9-290X Hybrid ICEQ edition. The card uses liquid cooling for the GPU that runs towards a 120mm radiator. On the card itself there still is a sma...

HIS Radeon R7-260X iCooler reviewToday we'll review the AMD Radeon R7-260X, a brother of the 260. The Radeon R7 260X is fitted with a Curacao XT core which has cut down specifications with a total of 896 Stream processors, a compu...

HIS Radeon R9-280 IceQ X2 OC reviewIn this review we look at the Radeon R9-280 IceQ X2 OC review from HIS. R9-280 You read that right, anyone remember the Radeon HD 7950 ? Armed with a customized PCB and their top model IceQ coolers ...

HIS Radeon R9-290X reviewIn this review we test the HIS Radeon R9-290X. The product is based on the reference design of the original Radeon R9-290X. These cards are little beasts. As such this in-depth review will cover the V...