The New York Times is read by people who think they should run the country, and who are very good at crossword puzzles.

USA Today is read by people who think they ought to run the country but don't really understand The New York Times.

The Los Angeles Times is read by people who wouldn't mind running the country, if they could find the time and if they didn't have to leave Southern California to do it.

The Boston Globe is read by people whose parents used to run the country.

The New York Daily News is read by people who aren't too sure who's running the country and don't really care as long as they can get a seat on the train.

The New York Post is read by people who don't care who is running the country as long as they do something really scandalous, preferably while intoxicated.

The Chicago Tribune is read by people that are in prison that used to run the state, & would like to do so again, as would their constituents that are currently free on bail.

The Miami Herald is read by people who are running another country, but need the baseball scores.

The San Francisco Chronicle is read by people who aren't sure if there is a country or that anyone is running it; but if so, they oppose all that they stand for. There are occasional exceptions if the leaders are gay, handicapped, minority, feminist, atheists, and those who also happen to be illegal aliens from any other country or galaxy, provided of course, that they are not Republicans.

The National Enquirer is read by people trapped in line at the grocery store.

The Seattle Times is read by people who have recently caught a fish and need something to wrap it in.

In this environment, the news can be harder to believe than fiction.

Here are some of the posts that caught my eye. Hope you find something interesting.

Romo covers his feelings of sadness and regret over his injuries, and addresses his position on the team, and acknowledges that Prescott has earned the right to "his spot."

You see football is a meritocracy. You aren't handed anything. You earn everything. Every single day, over and over again. You have to prove it. That's the way the NFL, that football works; you have to prove it.

There's a lot to learn from Romo's speech about humility, about putting others before you, and being a team player ... Oh, and also about meritocracy.

The deck isn't always fair, but if you work harder and smarter than those around you, there's often a light at the end of the tunnel.

It's a reminder that you can't rest on your laurels. "Every single day, over and over again." winning is a habit, and you win with the time you put in before you ever step on a field.

Unhappy people find a way to be unhappy; losers find a way to lose – and winners find a way to win.

Last year, if you told me 2016 would be the year that: the Cubs would win the world series, a reality TV show host would be president, and Britain would leave the EU, I'd have assumed you were on drugs.

Even three months ago I would have been surprised.

Last week, MogIA, an AI, predicted that Donald Trump would win, making it 4 for 4. If you had been tracking the polls, that would have felt ridiculous, but computers can be more objective than you or me.

Trump's campaign was a polarizing affair, with massive backlash from liberals, and a mainstream media which almost completely missed the momentum Trump had.

There're massive parallels between the way the media reported this campaign, and what happened with Brexit. The media echo chamber was pro-Clinton and ended up ignoring the feelings of a large group of voters. In Britain it was the elderly ... in America, it was working-class white people.

Trump won swing states like Pennsylvania and Michigan in large part due to those voters feeling ignored and attacked by Clinton. Coal and Gas are their livelihoods, and efforts towards clean renewable energy could leave them jobless.

Think of all the moving pieces that had to align for Trump to get this far. Look at the candidates in the Republican primary, look at what happened with the Democratic primary, and look at voter turnout: