I'd rather not mess with Baby Hitler, because stuff to do with WWII would probably prevent my grandparents meeting, therefore preventing my birth which results in me not having the time machine to kill Hitler and so on and so forth. So basically killing Hitler would have probably broken time.

I would, however, go into the future to see if there's a cancer cure yet and give it to Bill Hicks and George Harrison.

Oh, and I'd probably go and scare the shit out of my 7-year old self for laughs.

I'd rather not mess with Baby Hitler, because stuff to do with WWII would probably prevent my grandparents meeting, therefore preventing my birth which results in me not having the time machine to kill Hitler and so on and so forth. So basically killing Hitler would have probably broken time.

Making History by Stephen Fry is a novel that explores a similar idea brilliantly. It's about a guy who goes back in time and poisons the water in Hitler's home village, making his mother miscarry. The only problem is, the guy who ends up running the Third Reich instead turns out to be a lot more vicious and efficient than Hitler would have been...

I'd rather not mess with Baby Hitler, because stuff to do with WWII would probably prevent my grandparents meeting, therefore preventing my birth which results in me not having the time machine to kill Hitler and so on and so forth. So basically killing Hitler would have probably broken time.

i would say if hitler never happened there would be more wars due to the european union not being created.