On 9/20/2011 8:46 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> Joe,
...
> Rather than such a vigorous attack on this entire idea, it would be more
> helpful to contribute to the functional spec for the updating process,
> to ensure adequate convenience and 'protection'.
Some ideas are not worth supporting at all. This community seems to
ignore that concept on a regular basis.
IF this idea goes forward, however,
- it seems fine to provide an alias to addresses already
in an RFC
- anything beyond that which tracks/changes those aliases
to follow authors MUST be opt-in ONLY
Joe