Tweeting the century-old Al-Aqsa libel

Friday night, I discovered that on his Electronic Intifada blog, Ali Abunimah had put up a post claiming that Likud leaders were planning to go to Al-Aqsa early Sunday morning and that they were calling for “cleansing” Jerusalem and building a Jewish temple instead of the mosque. At the bottom of the post, Abunimah added an update that half-heartedly acknowledged that there was no basis to the story, but he nevertheless concluded by claiming:

“There’s certainly no doubt that whoever published this flyer […] is tapping into a history of calls and growing support for destroying Al-Aqsa. Feiglin’s supporters too are clear about their desire to take over the Temple Mount.”

In response, I wrote a post pointing out that spurious claims about Jewish threats to the Al-Aqsa mosque had been used by Arab agitators for almost a hundred years: it was the notorious mufti Haj Amin al Husseini who first used this libel in the 1920s. In the almost 100 years that have passed since then, it was of course only sites sacred to Jews that were desecrated and destroyed in Jerusalem.

When I wrote this post last night, I noted that Abunimah’s post had about 100 tweets and some 150 Facebook endorsements. Some 24 hours later, it had 381 tweets and 523 Facebook “likes”, and there were the beginnings of a Twitter intifada: word of the evil designs of the wicked Likudniks had reached the popular Egyptian-American writer Mona Eltahawy, who send out a tweet about it – and she has more than 100 000 followers…

Luckily, by that time, Anne-Marie Slaughter, former Director of Policy Planning at the U.S. State Department and professor at Princeton, had also gotten word of the story and found out that it was a hoax. Realizing that it was a very dangerous hoax, she sent out multiple tweets to alert her more than 20 000 followers.

Mona Eltahawy quickly deleted her original tweet and also helped to get out the message that it was a hoax, but by that time, the Al-Aqsa libel was already spreading like wildfire. As one tweet by a professor of sociology put it: “Scared of all the fake rumors about Al #Aqsa. First rule of sociology is if enough people believe something, it will have real consequences.”

Maybe Ali Abunimah will be pleased by the thought that just like with his #IsraelHates- campaign, he once again managed to cause a stir in the Twittersphere – and this time around there was even the specter of going from a merely verbal “Electronic Intifada” to a real intifada of senseless violence and bloodshed.

Elder of Ziyon quotes my post and adds several examples documenting the relentless attempts to incite hatred and violence against Israel with fabricated stories:

The Al Aqsa Heritage Foundation and various Muslim firebrands are well-known for creating false rumors about supposed Israeli designs on the Temple Mount. They do it practically every week on their website, and many of those make it into the mainstream Palestinian Arab press. Here are just a few I have documented over the years:

Some very interesting additional material can be found in a post with the great title “Liar Liar, Mosque on Fire” by Zionist Shark at IsraellyCool: There is a very useful aerial view of the Temple Mount, and a link to an article by Mordechai Kedar who explains how Jerusalem came to be seen as holy by Muslims.

3 responses to “Tweeting the century-old Al-Aqsa libel”

According to the RSS feed the poster was published February 8 and it is similar to the other posters on the blog. The exif data also indicates it was done with Microsoft Office, like the other posters on the blog.

Hey Ali, glad you tweeted my link but it doesn’t really help your case. Any nutjob can make a poster and slap a logo on it, it doesn’t make it official. You are still responsible for spreading panic and potentially getting people hurt.

Great job, Iris — this indeed looks like the source. And as you say, it doesn’t help Abunimah’s case: it’s well-known that there have long been some tiny fringe groups agitating for a 3rd Temple etc., but it is equally well-known that Israeli security forces are keeping a tight watch over them and have always moved to frustrate their agenda. Indeed, I wouldn’t have had a problem if Abunimah had written a post saying something like oh, here we go again, some fringe group wants to have the Temple Mount all for themselves & they’ve wanted that for a long time, but have always been kept in check by Israeli police. But of course, Abunimah tried to make it a Likud plot, insinuating that there was “growing” public support for it, and even suggesting in his tweets that Netanyahu should be questioned about his party endorsing the destruction of Al-Aqsa etc.etc. And of course, Abunimah can be expected to be very familiar with the long history of all the senseless incitement (and the resulting violence) re. imaginary Jewish plots to damage or destroy Al Aqsa. There is no doubt that he knew what he was doing.

To be sure, that’s how he (and his fellow EI bloggers) always work: take a news item that suits your agenda, ignore all relevant context and background, distort as needed, and blow it up beyond all proportion.

The Yossele Schumacher affair was basically a domestic quarrel that got out of hand. It took two Supreme Court decisions, a nationwide police search and ultimately a joint Mossad-Shin Bet operation to find the kidnapped boy. The affair exposed a rift between religious and secular Jews. The cry "Where is Yossele?"directed in defiance towards ultra-o […]