In article <590128b7-feb6-445d-8d4e-2901a7615763@googlegroups.com>, mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:> On Sunday, 4 May 2014 19:52:33 UTC+2, Virgil wrote:> > In article <26289e8d-c30e-4b6f-84aa-73b9e344aa01@googlegroups.com>,> > mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:> > > > Does WM then claim that one can be ruled by rules that have not been > > > > and > > > > cannot be stated explicitly?

> > > I am asking whether this rule has been made explicit. There are opinions > > > stating that everything has to be made explicit, otherwise it cannot be > > > accepted.

> > It is mere common sense. > > How can one sensibly be REQUIRED to obey a rule unless it is explicitly > > stated?

> But you just said that this rule is merely common sense.

Does WM require that everything that is common sense must be explicitly stated before it can be accepted as being common sense?

That is a most uncommon view of what common sense is.

Most people regard "common sense" as consisting of those things that normally do NOT have to be explicitly stated to be accepted.

But then, anything at all like common sense is remarkably uncommon in WM's wild weird world of WMytheology.--