If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Re: Browns-Colts thread

No, but it is an indicator....... I have watched Tannehill a little and I saw some good things in him....

Have you seen any good things in Luck? I'm just wondering cause all I get to read is writers who are Colts fans making excuses for him, but I've really started to have my doubts. Obviously you are an expert that refuses to make any excuses. I mean, that completion percentage

Re: Browns-Colts thread

No, but it is an indicator....... I have watched Tannehill a little and I saw some good things in him....

We know it's black and white. Nothing good about Luck and nothing bad about anyone whom we compare him to. Clearly no one should take take anything you say seriously. We understand that it's your role to amuse rather than educate.

Re: Browns-Colts thread

We know it's black and white. Nothing good about Luck and nothing bad about anyone whom we compare him to. Clearly no one should take take anything you say seriously. We understand that it's your role to amuse rather than educate.

OK. Keep taking the lowest rated players and see how that works out for you. Not well, I think......

Re: Browns-Colts thread

Manning had like a 57 rating in his first 6 games, so clearly Indy made the wrong choice there. That was obviously an indicator of things to come. Keep leaning on that worthless stat, Blu, we're all taking you less and less serious, which is considerably less.

Last edited by Kid Minneapolis; 10-23-2012 at 08:32 PM.

There are two types of quarterbacks in the league: Those whom over time, the league figures out ... and those who figure out the league.

Re: Browns-Colts thread

Manning had like a 57 rating in his first 6 games, so clearly Indy made the wrong choice there. That was obviously an indicator of things to come. Keep leaning on that worthless stat, Blu, we're all taking you less and less serious, which is considerably less.

I don't really believe in stats but some of the stat monkeys here rely on them. I believe what I see.... Also, there are some differences in the game today and in 1998 so I am not sure those numbers related over that many years......

Re: Browns-Colts thread

I don't really believe in stats but some of the stat monkeys here rely on them. I believe what I see.... Also, there are some differences in the game today and in 1998 so I am not sure those numbers related over that many years......

You've been trying to use stats to push your agenda against Luck this whole time so cut the **** seriously.

"I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about." - Peter Griffin

Re: Browns-Colts thread

I don't really believe in stats but some of the stat monkeys here rely on them. I believe what I see.... Also, there are some differences in the game today and in 1998 so I am not sure those numbers related over that many years......

1. Virtually everything you have said about Luck lately has revolved around stats.

2. 28 interceptions is 28 interceptions. I don't care if it's 1938, 1968, 1998, or 2012. Manning was very sloppy as a rookie and was not at all better than Luck is today. Luck is actually better so far. He's much better at protecting the ball. I'm sure you were willing to be patient back then with Manning. But you hate Luck because he replaced Manning and that completely clouds everything you say.

3. If Luck has a fourth season like Manning in 01, you will without question call for his release.

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sollozzo For This Useful Post:

Re: Browns-Colts thread

What he is saying is, "I don't believe in stats unless they support my argument."

Back to this, because I am not going to let it go. If other people keep quoting him and ****, I'm going to keep *****ing about him. And before the first genius around here says to put him on ignore, he has been since about his 7th post. Anyway, how do we get rid of him? The bizarre decision not to ban him because he is an expert at skirting the rules around here would work if this were the ****ing government or justice department, but it's a message board he is making it his pathetic goal to disrupt. I got banned for three "**** yous" directed at one person. This guy is ruining an entire board and baiting people with his asinine posts. At what point is enough enough?

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to cdash For This Useful Post:

Re: Browns-Colts thread

Can we flush the flipping toilet already?

"Nobody wants to play against Tyler Hansbrough NO BODY!" ~ Frank Vogel

"And David put his hand in the bag and took out a stone and slung it. And it struck the Philistine on the head and he fell to the ground. Amen. "
Want your own "Just Say No to Kamen" from @mkroeger pic? http://twitpic.com/a3hmca

Re: Browns-Colts thread

What he is saying is, "I don't believe in stats unless they support my argument."

Back to this, because I am not going to let it go. If other people keep quoting him and ****, I'm going to keep *****ing about him. And before the first genius around here says to put him on ignore, he has been since about his 7th post. Anyway, how do we get rid of him? The bizarre decision not to ban him because he is an expert at skirting the rules around here would work if this were the ****ing government or justice department, but it's a message board he is making it his pathetic goal to disrupt. I got banned for three "**** yous" directed at one person. This guy is ruining an entire board and baiting people with his asinine posts. At what point is enough enough?

To add to this, even if he's on ignore his posts will still show up if you aren't logged in.

Re: Browns-Colts thread

What he is saying is, "I don't believe in stats unless they support my argument."

Back to this, because I am not going to let it go. If other people keep quoting him and ****, I'm going to keep *****ing about him. And before the first genius around here says to put him on ignore, he has been since about his 7th post. Anyway, how do we get rid of him? The bizarre decision not to ban him because he is an expert at skirting the rules around here would work if this were the ****ing government or justice department, but it's a message board he is making it his pathetic goal to disrupt. I got banned for three "**** yous" directed at one person. This guy is ruining an entire board and baiting people with his asinine posts. At what point is enough enough?

Re: Browns-Colts thread

What he is saying is, "I don't believe in stats unless they support my argument."

Back to this, because I am not going to let it go. If other people keep quoting him and ****, I'm going to keep *****ing about him. And before the first genius around here says to put him on ignore, he has been since about his 7th post. Anyway, how do we get rid of him? The bizarre decision not to ban him because he is an expert at skirting the rules around here would work if this were the ****ing government or justice department, but it's a message board he is making it his pathetic goal to disrupt. I got banned for three "**** yous" directed at one person. This guy is ruining an entire board and baiting people with his asinine posts. At what point is enough enough?

And why isn't it the same thing when you all ignore the traditional QB stats and instead use another stat that supports your position. That is what stats do. They can be bent and twisted to do anything. Now do you really think that I believe that Luck is the 31st best QB in the NFL? The answer to that is, no, I don't believe that. I also do not believe he is a top ten QB as some other stats show. Do I believe that RGIII is the one of the best five QBs in the NFL right now? Of course not but I was making a big point about stats that sailed right over the heads of most of you. What I do believe is that RGIII, right now, playing on the Redskins, if a better QB that Andrew Luck, right now, playing on the Colts.... I also believe that neither on of them deserves to even be mentioned in an comparison to Peyton Manning. I firmly believe we have the worst owner in the NFL and only the shear luck (pardon the pun) of getting Peyton Manning ever made them anything. Take out the Manning years and look at the rest of the Irsay years. How do you like that? Well, that is what I believe we are in for.

I have not been rude to you and if I were a mod, YOU are the one I would ban for your insults and trying to censor another poster. But, hey, that is just me..... It didn't take long for someone to tell you to use the "ignore" button even though you told them not to do it..... Seven whole posts.... my but you make up your mind quickly don't you....