FLSA Endangered Species: The Part-Time Exempt Employee

With the Department of Labor planning to release new Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) regulations in 2016, one question that I get frequently is what will happen to part-time exempt employees–professionals (nurses, accountants, etc.), managers, or other administrative personnel who are treated as exempt from the FLSA’s minimum wage and overtime requirements. My answer is that part-time exempt employees are likely an endangered species. If your business takes advantage of part-time exempt staff, start planning now for how to restructure those positions. To understand why, let’s look at a common example.

Assume that an employer pays its assistant store manager $500 per week on a salary basis for working a half-time schedule of roughly 20-25 hours per week and that the manager meets all of the requirements for the FLSA’s executive exemption. No problem, right? The current minimum salary level under the FLSA regulations is $455 per week, $45 below the manager’s salary. The employer is free to treat this employee as exempt for now. However, what happens after the 2016 regulations take effect? Depending on changes in the CPI, we’ll see the salary level jump to roughly $970 per week. Can the employer continue to pay an exempt manager only $500 per week? Can it prorate the salary, given that the manager works only a half-time schedule? Unfortunately, no. The $970 salary level (and the current $455/week level) do not have any exceptions. Even the fact that the exempt manager only works half time does not make a difference here. The DOL Wage and Hour Division has observed that the FLSA regulations do not permit employers to take part time status into account when determining whether a salary level meets the exemption’s requirements. In a 2008 opinion letter, WHD explained clearly that “the salary requirement of $455 per week may not be prorated to reflect reduced hours, and the employee paid a salary of [less than that] does not qualify for the exemption. . . .”.

Upshot for Employers

A part-time manager, nurse, engineer, or other employee who currently meets the salary level test but will fall below it after the DOL releases its new regulations may not require much adjustment. Some employers might decide to change a part-time exempt employee’s compensation method, such as by paying him or her on an hourly basis. However, a drastic change like this may not be necessary in many cases.

In our example above, if the assistant store manager will only work 20-25 hours per week, maintaining the existing $500/week salary is unlikely to alter the employer’s compensation expenses substantially. Remember that just because an employee receives a salary does not mean that they are exempt from overtime. Here, the store could simply continue to pay $500 per week. Even if the assistant store manager worked 25 hours in every workweek, then a $500 per week salary represents $20 per hour, well above the minimum wage required by any current federal, state, or local regulation. Of course, in weeks where the store manager happens to work more than 40 hours per week, then the employer would owe him or her an overtime premium for all hours worked over 40. The real potential headache here is in tracking hours. Unless your state or local requirements differ, employers are not required to track the hours that exempt employees work during a workweek. Part-time exempt employees who get shifted to non-exempt status by virtue of the new FLSA regulations will also trigger additional recordkeeping requirements, too.

Restructuring these positions is necessary, but not necessarily difficult. Whenever you move employees from exempt to non-exempt status for any reason, be sure to cover any additional recordkeeping requirements and consider the effect that the change will have for state and local laws as well.

4 comments

Why has someone not sued the DOL about prorating the minimum salary for the exempt employee? It seems that if an exempt employee meets the annual salary requirement, then the salary could be set for a part-time exempt employee, for example 20 hours for 50% of the full time salary.

The implication here is that only highly compensated exempt employees can qualify for part-time exempt work. Is this discrimination?

We have a person who is paid $600/week for 25 hours of work. Her exempt status will change on 12/1/16 and she will become overtime eligible.

If she works more than 25 hours and less than 40 hours in a week, are we required to pay the employee for those hours over 25, but less than 40. Example: the employee works 35 hours in a given week. Are we requires to pay $834 instead of $600?

I can’t give you legal advice about your specific situation, but speaking generally, the FLSA only requires that employees be paid overtime for hours worked after 40. Your state laws may differ, and your organization may have other policies, so you should not rely solely on the FLSA when discussing this matter with an attorney.

keep in mind there have been employers who have moved part-time employees to salary basis (part-time), knowing from prior record that the job requires many more hours than those alotted, for the pure purpose of paying for, lets say 24hrs, for what actually requires at least 32 hrs weekly to do.

Check Also

We talk regularly about the DOL’s focus on misclassifications or the potential liability for unpaid overtime, but these are all civil penalties. Although they are somewhat rare, the FLSA and other wage and hour statutes provide opportunities for criminal charges against employers. In recent years, the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division has issued press releases trumpeting criminal charges brought against employers. For instance, ...