XForms WG,
We are not asking you to become dependent on a CDF spec, but simply
reference it and acknowledge that XForms is a compound document. This
would make it more clear to people where XForms fits into the W3C
architecture.
ALSO - Nick your emails to the member-cdf WG did not arrive to that mail
list. Would you please resend them to member-cdf@w3.org from another email
address that is not blocked?
CDF WG
From: Nick Van den Bleeken <xforms-issues@mn.aptest.com>
To: Kevin E Kelly/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Cc: member-cdf@w3.org, www-forms-editor@w3.org
Date: 09/12/2007 06:37 AM
Subject: Re: CDF02 - Abstract (moved to Introduction) missing reference to compound documents. (PR#125)
Dear CDF WG,
1) This is only a working draft whose advancement we don't want to be tied
to.
2) XForms is intended to be used with host languages even if they do not
observe
the compound document framework.
Regards,
Nick Van den Bleeken
> Change
> "XForms is not a free-standing document type, but is intended to be
> integrated into other markup languages, "
> To
> "XForms is not a free-standing document type, but is intended to be
> integrated into other markup languages as a compound document [see CDRF
1.0
> ]. "
> Add to Appendix B References
> "CDRF 1.0
> Compound Document by Reference Framework 1.0, Timur Mehrvarz,
Lasse
> Pajunen, Julien Quint, Daniel Applequist,
> 2007, W3C Working Draft available at http://www.w3.org/TR/CDR/"
> Rationale: Compound Document is the W3C term for a document that combines
> multiple formats.
>
>