Colorado's constitution plainly says that state and local governments can't raise taxes without voters' permission. If only the Colorado Supreme Court could read plain language.
Instead, the court's liberal majority ignores terms that should obviously
protect taxpayers and instead emphasizes extraneous arguments that
accommodate government.

This latest legal chicanery comes from the same playbook that turned the
First Amendment's guarantee of religious freedom into a tool to suppress
religious speech.

Now voters who allowed their local school to keep, rather than refund,
excess property tax collections are being hit with a backdoor property tax
increase imposed by Gov. Bill Ritter and Democrat legislators.

When Colorado voters added the Taxpayers Bill or Rights (TABOR) to the state constitution, they prohibited state and local governments from enacting "a tax policy change directly causing a net tax revenue gain" without voter permission.

TABOR also limited total tax revenue increases to the combined rates of
inflation plus population growth. If population plus inflation increase by
5% but total property valuation increases by 10%, the excess must be
refunded to taxpayers and future mill levies reduced to avoid collecting the
excess again.

Lawmakers from both parties have understood that neither the mill levy nor
the assessment rate can be increased without a public vote. (The last
attempted vote failed by a 3-to-1 margin.)

In 174 of Colorado's 178 school districts, voters have authorized their
schools to keep the excess with the understanding - based on explicit
promises from school and state officials - that taxes would remain subject
to the population-plus-inflation limit.

Enter Colorado's newly empowered Democrats, who pay lip service to taxpayers but pledge allegiance to government. Ritter and his minions decided -
without voter approval - that reducing mill levies was no longer necessary
if voters had given their local school permission to keep excess revenues.

As a result, taxpayers coughed up an extra $117 million in the first year -
an amount estimated to double every three years. This obvious "tax policy
change" resulted in a "net revenue increase" which, to anyone without a law degree, clearly means voter permission is required.

But not according to Chief Justice Mary Mullarkey who ruled that Ritter and
his fellow tax-hikers were merely implementing the wishes of the voters in
those 174 districts - albeit years later.

Assurances to voters by school officials that taxes would remain capped
don't matter, the court said, because those voters approved ballot questions that permitted schools to retain "all revenues" - even revenues that didn't exist at the time of the vote.

Worse, those tax dollars won't increase funds for local schools. As local
taxpayers dig deeper, the state will reduce its contribution - instead
paying more for welfare entitlement programs or to colleges and
universities.

The consequences for voters and for schools are unfortunate. Voters can no
longer take the word of school officials that "no one wants to raise your
taxes." Even if local officials don't; state officials might and, thanks to
Mullarkey, they can do so without the consent of voters or local schools.

Colorado Association of School Boards also backed the tax hike, leaving many local officials with egg on their faces. School leaders who conscientiously recognize the potential backlash from voters who feel betrayed should present taxpayers with the opportunity to re-instate the TABOR limit on property tax revenue and ask voters if their school can keep the change under that limit.

For voters and taxpayers, the recurring lesson is that constitutional limits
on government are worthless if lawmakers won't abide by them and judges
won't enforce them.

Mark Hillman served as Colorado senate majority leader and state treasurer.
To read more or comment, go to www.MarkHillman.com