Search

A strength of this book is its history of the emergence of Holocaust dominance in the USA. Lipstadt comments, “By the late 1950s “Holocaust” was increasingly being used in conjunction with the murder of the Jews, but it still did not have the singular connotation it has today.” (p. 12). “By the end of the decade [1960s] the word had become firmly associated with the Third Reich’s murder of the Jews.” (p. 13).
>>more...

Owing to the vintage of this book, much of its information has been expanded upon, and will generally not be repeated here. See, for instance, The Massacre in Jedwabne, July 10, 1941: Before, During, After (read also the Peczkis review).
>>more...

The trend nowadays is to redefine non-German European nations (notably Poland) as co-perpetrators of the Holocaust (or at least "complicit in the Holocaust") for rather obvious reasons. For an update of Finkelstein, please click on, and read my detailed English-language review, of Nie musimy placic Zydom!. It is clear that, individual exceptions aside, the Poles owe the Jews nothing. All Jewish demands, for compensation for Jewish properties lost during the German-made Holocaust, had been satisfied in 1952 and 1960.
>>more...

" I don't think there's any need to analyze the Uprising in military terms. This was a war of less than a thousand people against a mighty army, and no one doubted how it was likely to turn out. This isn't a subject for study in a military school. Not the weapons, not the operations, not the tactics. If there's a school to study the human spirit, there it should be a major subject. The really important things were inherent in the force shown by Jewish youths, after years of degradation, to rise up against their destroyers and determine what death they would choose: Treblinka or Uprising.
>>more...

To anyone who has carefully examined this work, and heard Ewa Kurek speak (I have), it is obvious that her level of knowledge is far above that of the usual authors on this subject. Not surprisingly, she has been traduced by Jews owing to the fact that she is non-Judeocompliant.
>>more...

This book is much more than a biography of long-term Yiddishist activist Noah Prylucki (1882-1941). It offers a broad sweep of Jewish thinking from the latter part of the 19th to the first part of the 20th century. Owing to the fact that it is based primarily on Yiddish newspapers, it brings a wealth of information to light that would otherwise be inaccessible to the non-Yiddish reader.
>>more...

This book is much more than a biography of long-term Yiddishist activist Noah Prylucki (1882-1941). It offers a broad sweep of Jewish thinking from the latter part of the 19th to the first part of the 20th century. Owing to the fact that it is based primarily on Yiddish newspapers, it brings a wealth of information to light that would otherwise be inaccessible to the non-Yiddish reader
>>more...

Over 14 years ago divorce was granted in the United States and in Poland. It was quite contested. Attorneys have earned a lot of money, one of them about $ 154,000 and the other $ 254,000. Unfortunately, it was a lot of forged documents, the most outrageous was a fake bank document presented by the petitioner requesting the divorce: $ 200.000 dollars, which wasn’t showed in certificate listed in the said bank.
>>more...