Great way to start. Why don't you go post an intro in Newbietown, then lurk more and troll less.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

Read it again then until you get it.

Girls are not naturally graceful.

Wing Chun is definitely not graceful.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

No, only people have limitations. You seem to have many, and they are all in your head.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

Stop bitching about work, this isn't Facebook.

Stop making excuses.

Tough is just you crying about it.

Not often enough.

That's great. Such as?

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

This is a Low Content Post.

It might been worth something insightful if anyone here knew who you were and valued whenever you exhaled or grunted, but since they don't, it's a complete waste of bytes.

Do you disagree? If so, go back to Yahoo Answers and keep trucking for Level 8 wizard powers.

If not, go post an introduction in Newbietown.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

To be truly strong, the skin has to be thick both outside and in. Yours apparently needs work.

Now shut the **** up and go train. It's the best advice I ever got on Bullshido.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

This "think they are better" theme has you going in circles too.

Who, anywhere in this thread, has said or implied they are better at martial arts? The only two people bringing THAT herring up happen to be you and the other guy with less than 20 posts.

Weird, right? The irony of course known to everyone is that if there is ONE thing I have never claimed to be any good at, it is martial arts. Go find the post where I did, asshole, before you come on here and begin your (short lived) soapbox session.

So let me get this straight. If I like Bullshido for its value and someone else doesn't, the correct solution is that I should challenge them to a duel and try to kick their ass to prove that my favorite martial arts website is superior to Yahoo Answers?

You said it was a "serious issue", a red herring attempting to get around your highly implausible claim. I challenged you on that and you failed to show why, and gave a crappy explanation of how two people might end up utilizing the same IP address. Got news for you, the same thing applies to toilets.

You also failed to address the statisitcal unlikelihood of two people posting on Bullshido.net with similar behavior, writing style, level of idiocy, AND IP address.

So as you continue to double down on a statistical improbability, you must have no stronger, more plausible defense.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

Only an idiot would equate a martial arts ruleset with the generic situation of "street fight" which runs a spectrum from drunken shenanigans to first degree murder.

Yes, there are indeed safety parameters in "the street": "the law".

The law is what (usually) prevents two grown men from murdering each other in "da street", much like the MMA ruleset prevents two grown men from murdering each other in the ring.

But, "the law" is not a tangible thing. It's not "real". Neither is the MMA ruleset. So there are of course law/rule breakers in both MMA and "da street".

When they decide to break that rule, yep anything goes. In the ring, it can get you disqualified. In "the street" in New Jersey, it can be 30 days to 10 years in a state prison. So you tell me just how much better learning to "street fight" without rules versus MMA and other arts which teach both aggression as well as self control.

A skilled judoka could easily kill a man in "the street" by throwing his head into the curb with no other training whatsoever. So, randori is a fine "recreation" of "da street" as well, where one good throw can mean victory.

And what makes you think an MMA fighter or judoka or boxer or even Chunner (lord have mercy) couldn't put their knee through your spine in a street fight when the ref and physical ring are not there? Is that something that requires special training or something?

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

Liar. Go into the lost post, I double dog dare you.

It may be statistically possible but highly improbable. The very fact that you're double downing on it suggests you're being deceptive.

You don't know **** about IP addresses or statistics or fooling people.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

I like how you completely ignored me. Here we go.

You're probably just doing it wrong.

Doing it wrong.

What the **** do you know about power generation.

What the **** are you talking about with "any boxing punch other than a jab".

Bullshit.

Bullshit.

Much like a single punch, right?

What the ****?

Oh.

What the ****?

Right because it's all in the non-physical, fast twitch muscle fibre strength.

Great way to start. Why don't you go post an intro in Newbietown, then lurk more and troll less.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

Read it again then until you get it.

Girls are not naturally graceful.

Wing Chun is definitely not graceful.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

No, only people have limitations. You seem to have many, and they are all in your head.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

Stop bitching about work, this isn't Facebook.

Stop making excuses.

Tough is just you crying about it.

Not often enough.

That's great. Such as?

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

This is a Low Content Post.

It might been worth something insightful if anyone here knew who you were and valued whenever you exhaled or grunted, but since they don't, it's a complete waste of bytes.

Do you disagree? If so, go back to Yahoo Answers and keep trucking for Level 8 wizard powers.

If not, go post an introduction in Newbietown.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

To be truly strong, the skin has to be thick both outside and in. Yours apparently needs work.

Now shut the **** up and go train. It's the best advice I ever got on Bullshido.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

This "think they are better" theme has you going in circles too.

Who, anywhere in this thread, has said or implied they are better at martial arts? The only two people bringing THAT herring up happen to be you and the other guy with less than 20 posts.

Weird, right? The irony of course known to everyone is that if there is ONE thing I have never claimed to be any good at, it is martial arts. Go find the post where I did, asshole, before you come on here and begin your (short lived) soapbox session.

So let me get this straight. If I like Bullshido for its value and someone else doesn't, the correct solution is that I should challenge them to a duel and try to kick their ass to prove that my favorite martial arts website is superior to Yahoo Answers?

You said it was a "serious issue", a red herring attempting to get around your highly implausible claim. I challenged you on that and you failed to show why, and gave a crappy explanation of how two people might end up utilizing the same IP address. Got news for you, the same thing applies to toilets.

You also failed to address the statisitcal unlikelihood of two people posting on Bullshido.net with similar behavior, writing style, level of idiocy, AND IP address.

So as you continue to double down on a statistical improbability, you must have no stronger, more plausible defense.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

Only an idiot would equate a martial arts ruleset with the generic situation of "street fight" which runs a spectrum from drunken shenanigans to first degree murder.

Yes, there are indeed safety parameters in "the street": "the law".

The law is what (usually) prevents two grown men from murdering each other in "da street", much like the MMA ruleset prevents two grown men from murdering each other in the ring.

But, "the law" is not a tangible thing. It's not "real". Neither is the MMA ruleset. So there are of course law/rule breakers in both MMA and "da street".

When they decide to break that rule, yep anything goes. In the ring, it can get you disqualified. In "the street" in New Jersey, it can be 30 days to 10 years in a state prison. So you tell me just how much better learning to "street fight" without rules versus MMA and other arts which teach both aggression as well as self control.

A skilled judoka could easily kill a man in "the street" by throwing his head into the curb with no other training whatsoever. So, randori is a fine "recreation" of "da street" as well, where one good throw can mean victory.

And what makes you think an MMA fighter or judoka or boxer or even Chunner (lord have mercy) couldn't put their knee through your spine in a street fight when the ref and physical ring are not there? Is that something that requires special training or something?

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

Liar. Go into the lost post, I double dog dare you.

It may be statistically possible but highly improbable. The very fact that you're double downing on it suggests you're being deceptive.

You don't know **** about IP addresses or statistics or fooling people.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

I like how you completely ignored me. Here we go.

You're probably just doing it wrong.

Doing it wrong.

What the **** do you know about power generation.

What the **** are you talking about with "any boxing punch other than a jab".

Bullshit.

Bullshit.

Much like a single punch, right?

What the ****?

Oh.

What the ****?

Right because it's all in the non-physical, fast twitch muscle fibre strength.

Great way to start. Why don't you go post an intro in Newbietown, then lurk more and troll less.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

Read it again then until you get it.

Girls are not naturally graceful.

Wing Chun is definitely not graceful.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

No, only people have limitations. You seem to have many, and they are all in your head.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

Stop bitching about work, this isn't Facebook.

Stop making excuses.

Tough is just you crying about it.

Not often enough.

That's great. Such as?

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

This is a Low Content Post.

It might been worth something insightful if anyone here knew who you were and valued whenever you exhaled or grunted, but since they don't, it's a complete waste of bytes.

Do you disagree? If so, go back to Yahoo Answers and keep trucking for Level 8 wizard powers.

If not, go post an introduction in Newbietown.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

To be truly strong, the skin has to be thick both outside and in. Yours apparently needs work.

Now shut the **** up and go train. It's the best advice I ever got on Bullshido.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

This "think they are better" theme has you going in circles too.

Who, anywhere in this thread, has said or implied they are better at martial arts? The only two people bringing THAT herring up happen to be you and the other guy with less than 20 posts.

Weird, right? The irony of course known to everyone is that if there is ONE thing I have never claimed to be any good at, it is martial arts. Go find the post where I did, asshole, before you come on here and begin your (short lived) soapbox session.

So let me get this straight. If I like Bullshido for its value and someone else doesn't, the correct solution is that I should challenge them to a duel and try to kick their ass to prove that my favorite martial arts website is superior to Yahoo Answers?

You said it was a "serious issue", a red herring attempting to get around your highly implausible claim. I challenged you on that and you failed to show why, and gave a crappy explanation of how two people might end up utilizing the same IP address. Got news for you, the same thing applies to toilets.

You also failed to address the statisitcal unlikelihood of two people posting on Bullshido.net with similar behavior, writing style, level of idiocy, AND IP address.

So as you continue to double down on a statistical improbability, you must have no stronger, more plausible defense.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

Only an idiot would equate a martial arts ruleset with the generic situation of "street fight" which runs a spectrum from drunken shenanigans to first degree murder.

Yes, there are indeed safety parameters in "the street": "the law".

The law is what (usually) prevents two grown men from murdering each other in "da street", much like the MMA ruleset prevents two grown men from murdering each other in the ring.

But, "the law" is not a tangible thing. It's not "real". Neither is the MMA ruleset. So there are of course law/rule breakers in both MMA and "da street".

When they decide to break that rule, yep anything goes. In the ring, it can get you disqualified. In "the street" in New Jersey, it can be 30 days to 10 years in a state prison. So you tell me just how much better learning to "street fight" without rules versus MMA and other arts which teach both aggression as well as self control.

A skilled judoka could easily kill a man in "the street" by throwing his head into the curb with no other training whatsoever. So, randori is a fine "recreation" of "da street" as well, where one good throw can mean victory.

And what makes you think an MMA fighter or judoka or boxer or even Chunner (lord have mercy) couldn't put their knee through your spine in a street fight when the ref and physical ring are not there? Is that something that requires special training or something?

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

Liar. Go into the lost post, I double dog dare you.

It may be statistically possible but highly improbable. The very fact that you're double downing on it suggests you're being deceptive.

You don't know **** about IP addresses or statistics or fooling people.

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

I like how you completely ignored me. Here we go.

You're probably just doing it wrong.

Doing it wrong.

What the **** do you know about power generation.

What the **** are you talking about with "any boxing punch other than a jab".

Bullshit.

Bullshit.

Much like a single punch, right?

What the ****?

Oh.

What the ****?

Right because it's all in the non-physical, fast twitch muscle fibre strength.

But a random selection of posts pulled out of context, going back months is your proof I'm the worst offender? I don't agree with that.

I understand your point, jnp.

Trust me, I won't be anyone's bother going forward. Auslander and I already had this discussion.

5/20/2013 10:58am,

IceColdMothafucka

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tranquil Suit

For the record, being a product of bullshido's oldstyle rough trade ways, I disagree with this new gentle approach. But that's not why BFM and jnp are arguing with Rabbit.

Allow me restate that.

There is no new noob policy... there isn't. *Meaningful look*

That said, on the flipside of members like Rabbit, I have always disagreed with members who are sugarflavor friendly to the point of inappropriate (Sri Hanuman comes to mind, but many members act like this in phases). It's as equally unproductive to misguided newbs as baseless razzing.

5/20/2013 11:00am,

jnp

Quote:

Originally Posted by W. Rabbit

Oh well if you're calling me pompous then I can't argue with that.

But a random selection of posts pulled out of context, going back months is your proof I'm the worst offender? I don't agree with that.

But I do think I understand your point. Trust me, I won't be anyone's bother.

You seem to have a problem admitting when you're wrong.

In this case, you are wrong. Also, recall that I said "probably the worst" which is not the same as "definitely the worst", because I'm not that presumptuous myself.

I don't think you're a bad poster. I think you and the site would benefit more from cutting the noobs more slack in all the forums for a few months. I'm not saying we're going to change our paradigm regarding the site's "no quarter given" policy. I'm saying we need to be a bit more patient with new members. If they still don't get the point after a few months, then no mercy should be shown.

Personally, I have adopted the attitude that you catch more flies with honey than ****.

I've been less than kind to that noob who attacked Judo Gene. I tried to be more civil in my last post to him in that thread because I'm trying to practice what I preach.