“If the city of San Francisco accepts the donated comfort women statue, then the sister city agreement will be dissolved,” he said in a press conference on September 25.

The figure in San Francisco is unlike the model of a single girl that South Korean organizations have erected in other countries. This one features three women holding hands and forming a circle, with their backs to each other. It bears an inscription approved by the city council, clearly calling the comfort women “sex slaves”—in contrast with how the Japanese government would characterize them.

Osaka Mayor Yoshimura wrote this open letter on September 29 to make the city’s position on the issue clear:

September 29, 2017

The Honorable Edwin M. Lee

Mayor

City and County of San Francisco

Dear Mayor Lee,

On behalf of the citizens of Osaka, I would like to express my sincere gratitude for your continued support towards the sister city exchanges between our cities. It is unfortunate that you will not be able to come, but I look forward to giving a heartfelt welcome to the San Francisco delegation visiting Osaka in October.

According to the news sources from San Francisco, I learned that the unveiling ceremony for the Comfort Women Memorial and plaque took place on September 22nd. Furthermore, I was made aware that the San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed a resolution on September 19th to declare the day of the unveiling as “Comfort Women Day.”

Referring back to previously sent letters dated February 1st and March 29th, 2017, allow me to reiterate that there is disagreement among historians regarding historical facts such as the number of “comfort women,” the degree to which the former Japanese Army was involved, and the extent of the wartime harm. I am gravely concerned that by regarding uncertain and one-sided claims as historical facts and inscribing them onto the plaque would not be squarely facing the past, but rather a criticism of Japan.

Although the Comfort Women Memorial and plaque is currently established on private property, I have been informed that there are plans for it to become a public property. This should be a historic year to commemorate the 60th anniversary of our sister city affiliation. I am deeply worried that an action of this kind will not only lead to a disruption in the communities of your city, but it could also negatively affect the sister city exchanges as well.

For the steadfast sister city relations that have prospered over many years, I earnestly wish that it will continue even further. However, if the Comfort Women Memorial and plaque were to be located upon public property as an expression of the will of the City and County of San Francisco, not only would it be extremely regrettable, but the City of Osaka must then rethink the sister city relationship.

In August of last year, I was able to meet with you in person, and with the foundation of the friendship we have created, I can honestly convey to you about these concerns that I bear. Hoping for our cities’ bright future, I once again strongly urge you to treat this issue with careful consideration in order to prevent the Comfort Women Memorial and plaque from being situated on public property.

Just as my previous letter, please accept this in the form of an open letter to widely reach the citizens of both cities so that they can understand my views.

3 Comments

Here is an interesting study published by Stanford University, which compares school textbooks in several Asian countries and the United States.
It sees with this study that, contrary to what many gens＊ believe, Japanese textbooks are more neutral, mainly tell the facts, then in other countries (China and Korea for example), a part of the story is changed or omitted for the patriotic interests.

I think their education to fan hatred not peace for Japan.
Unfortunately, these practices will not help countries to understand better.

The comfort women statue will create conflict between Chinese and Korean background citizens and Japanese background citizens in SF.
It is not good in your multicultural society.

gens：les ＊beaucoup visits to Yasukuni, the differences between China and Japan on Nanjing, comfort women and the image of a very nationalist Japanese Government presented by foreign newspapers convey this impression.

Nowhere does this article mention the ethnicities of the girls in the statute. Yes there is a Korean girl, but there is a Chinese girl and a Filipino girl. Comfort Women, girls, and boys were not only from colonial Korea. The trafficked girls were from Japan and Japan’s colonies. However, the majority of Comfort Women were “opportunities”. They were acquired by threat, force, and purchased. Every Naval and Army paymaster was trained to set up and manage a comfort station. This state-sanctioned system condoned personal acquisition of girls and boys, as was the case in the Philippines and throughout the Pacific. The famous Michael Yon also found a contract of the Imperial Japanese Army purchasing a brothel in Bangkok. This was a another form of acquisition. Also there were Western missionaries throughout Asia. Research is revealing that the nuns, nurses, and missionary wives were also trafficked and murdered. It is Osaka’s shame to deny this history and San Francisco would benefit greatly from any distance from the backwards, delusionary leadership in Osaka.

Huh??? The evil military that supposedly snatched hundreds of thousands of teenage virgins, the army of yellow monsters who raped and butchered the helpless sex slaves kept in ‘rape centers’ before murdering most of them, sometimes making soup out of them… and you’re saying that these beasts actually took the time to purchase a brothel in Bangkok??? You have no idea how incredibly asinine and grotesquely irrational you sound. No, the Japanese military was not in the business of buying brothels, impoverished women, or kiddy porn. But let’s have some fun by first showing us the deed.