To recap what happened, ace reviewer William Struse posted last month a 5-star critique of Joseph Farah’s highly acclaimed new release, “The Gospel in Every Book of the Old Testament,” which has been called a “breakthrough Bible book,” released in a preview e-book version exclusively on Amazon Kindle and the WND Superstore. Then, this week, Amazon deleted the review, along with 622 other reviews posted over the last five years by Struse, explaining that recent review exhibited “bias.”

“I’ve checked my reviews and it looks like they have all been restored except for one review,” Struse told WND. “Yep, it’s a review of Farah’s other book, ‘The Restitution of All Things.’ I tried to add it back in but I got the bias message again. I was a bit skeptical that this was really a vendetta against him, but it looks like it may be. Crazy stuff.”

Farah said he was not surprised, but says he sees evidence of a much wider problem at Amazon – not just personal or professional malice toward himself, but anti-Christian bias by the king of e-commerce.

“I do not believe this is some innocent misunderstanding or glitch,” said Farah. “There’s a pattern developing, and I believe it is associated with or illustrated by – take your pick – Amazon’s partnership with the Southern Poverty Law Center, a stridently anti-Christian, anti-conservative, anti-Farah, leftist extremist organization that not only provides content guidance to Amazon, but also to Google, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter. How can one explain that the entire Internet Cartel that is imposing its own cultural, spiritual and political worldview on online communications just happens to be in bed with the SPLC goons?”

Farah cites, as such an example, the Amazon Smile program that allows customers to donate a tiny fraction of their purchases to charities of their choice.

Recently, the Alliance Defending Freedom, which has won seven cases at the U.S. Supreme Court in the last seven years in defense of religious and civil rights, said it has been dropped from the Smile program because it has been labeled by the SPLC as a “hate group” for defending traditional marriage. ADF charged SPLC “exploits the terms ‘hate’ and ‘hate group’ against any organization it disagrees with.” SPLC’s hate list also was used by the charity-information site GuideStar, prompting lawsuits. The SPLC famously labeled Christian pediatric brain surgeon Dr. Ben Carson, a former presidential candidate and currently serving as secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, as an “extremist.” The SPLC was also tied to domestic terrorism through Floyd Lee Corkins, who confessed to FBI agents that he relied on an SPLC “hate map” to target the Family Research Council with a mass-murder attempt at the Christian organization’s Washington, D.C., headquarters. SPLC also was reprimanded by the administration of former President Barack Obama, and the Department of Defense and FBI have severed ties to the group.

In a letter of protest to Amazon, the ADF wrote: “It you are going to rely on a discredited partisan organization like the SPLC to determine who is eligible to participate in Amazon Smile, you should disclose that in your policy and to your customers,” ADF said. “Millions of Americans share our beliefs and thousands of Christian, Jewish, and Muslim religious organizations subscribe to them as well. … We want to secure the rights guaranteed in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution for every American. That’s why we defend people from many backgrounds and from many different walks of life, including artists, healthcare professionals, and university students.”

By contrast, the ADF told Amazon, the SPLC “would prefer to silence all opposing views, ridding the public square of civil discourse.”

“SPLC is not a neutral watchdog organization,” said Michael Farris, chief executive officer and chief counsel for ADF. “Instead, it raises money by slandering people and organizations who disagree with its views. ADF is one of the nation’s most respected and successful Supreme Court advocates, working to preserve our fundamental freedoms of speech, religion, and conscience for people from all walks of life. We would welcome the opportunity to meet with Amazon representatives to explain why they shouldn’t exclude us from the Amazon Smile program.”

Farah also points out that Amazon recently has been slow to request restocking of WND’s Christian movies and books, preferring to place “out of stock” messages on sell pages for weeks at a time, negatively affecting sales of such books. Amazon currently controls about 50 percent of the book market in North America and a growing percentage globally. It is now in a position, Farah says, to “kill books and movies it doesn’t like. You might say this would be contrary to Amazon’s own financial interests, but to Amazon, which is rapidly approaching monopoly status in e-commerce sales across the board, these revenues would amount to small potatoes. For a small, independent Christian-oriented company like WND, however, it is financially devastating.”

Struse, meanwhile, says his prime motivations for submitting reviews to Amazon since 2013 has been to keep current on biblical subjects of special interest to him, to sharpen his writing skills by taking on complicated subject matter and distilling it in concise fashion.

In 2014, he achieved a “Top 1,000” reviewer ranking at Amazon and last year reached the “Top 500” reviewer ranking on Amazon.

“Just to see what would happen I tried writing a new test review of the Gospel book and I got the message about non-compliance with Amazon’s customer review guidelines,” he told WND. “To be clear, I have not written any book reviews or product reviews for compensation of any kind. A year or two ago, when Amazon still allowed it, I did write some reviews of free products, but I clearly stated that in the reviews as required by Amazon. Maybe it’s time to move on, but I’d just like to know, after all these years and over 600 reviews, what I did that provoked such drastic action on their part.”

As for the matter of bias, Struse and Farah both agree, it’s in the eye of the beholder.

“The idea that book reviews are non-biased is ridiculous, absurd, patently irrational,” says Farah. “Book reviews are totally, 100 percent subjective, not objective. That’s the very nature of reviews. They represent someone’s personal opinion – just like a commentary. And when Amazon makes a decision to remove five years of book reviews in a sweeping action of this kind, that decision is clearly based on personal or corporate opinion that is a reflection of someone’s bias that cannot be measured or quantified. That Amazon thinks the SPLC is an unbiased resource to turn to on matters of content, that pretty much tells you all you need to know about the company’s corporate culture.”

Farah says there is something just plain wrong within the corporate culture of Amazon and what he calls “the Silicon Valley Cartel.”

“There’s a quiet war being waged by Amazon, Google, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube against the independent media, voices of political incorrectness, plainspoken Christian orthodoxy and conservative views,” says Farah. “It’s a scorched-earth, take-no-prisoners conflict. It’s not going to stop without challenge, without oversight, without major pressure or action from government. These institutions have become so powerful it threatens our heritage of free speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion. There needs to be accountability for this emerging cartel or the First Amendment will have no meaning in a future of digital communications controlled by a handful of mega-corporations that all employ patently extremist, narrow-minded content cops like the SPLC.”

It’s not the first time WND’s exposés have resulted in reversals by companies like Amazon, Google, Facebook and YouTube.

“But, the biggest reversal I would like to see by all of them is for them to break their cozy relationship with the SPLC – a dangerous, extremist, hard-core leftist group at war with Christians, conservatives, Republicans and anyone else who disagrees with their warped views,” Farah said.