Friday, 12 September 2014

Evil Empire versus Evil Caliphate: an analysis of the lies of the Nobel Peace Prizident

This article will probably not be for the
admirers – insofar as there are still any – of Barack Hussein Obama, also known
in these pages as the Nobel Peace Prizident or Drone Man.

I repeat: supporters of the
blood-soaked war criminal Barack Hussein Obama should not read this article. If
you are offended, you have only yourself
to blame.

Rather than watch the spectacle of Drone
Man actually speaking, I’ve read the
transcripts of his speech to the American people regarding the absolute and
urgent necessity of declaring an immediate jihad-cum-crusade against the
Islamic State, or Caliphate, or whatever it chooses to call itself on any given
day of the week. If you have a strong stomach for lies, you can read it here.

Now, of course I wouldn’t trust Drone Man
as far as I could throw him (always assuming one of his drones didn’t blow me
away while I was in the act of throwing him). But, though I made allowance for the fact that
Drone Man is (a) a politician and (b) even for a politician, an inveterate
liar, I was struck not so much by what he said as what he didn’t say in announcing what Justin Raimondo of antiwar.com called Operation Doubletalk. I took
away at least ten different points where he stayed silent – because silence, of
course, was his only way of avoiding the clear facts.

1. The
Nobel Peace Prizident didn't say that the American Empire still can't control
Afghanistan, and, in fact, is retreating in defeat.In fact, this used to be a Western
joke – repeated even in the sitcom Yes
Minister – once upon a time; “The Russians can’t even control Afghanistan!”
Well, the Americans have proved unable to control Afghanistan, or Iraq, or
anywhere, really, though they pretend to a global empire. Going by the actually
record of American force of arms since the Korean War against any determined
and motivated enemy, the prospects for America’s Third Iraq War are pretty
dismal.

2. Our favourite
war criminal crowed about the “killing” of Osama bin Laden. What he avoided
talking of, naturally, was that it was after bin Laden's alleged
"killing" that al Qaeda underwent a hitherto unprecedented expansion
in territory and power.In May
2011 it was still a series of cells scattered through a few backwaters. Today
it controls important territory in Libya, Mali and Yemen, not to mention in
Syria, and is still expanding in places like Lebanon.

3. Talking about Yemen,
Drone Man did mention that unhappy country, where as we all know his eponymous
flying killer robots have been active. What he didn't say was that his drone
attacks, which include the murder of people who go merely to help the victims
of his first strikes, have drastically increased support for al Qaeda in that
part of the world.

4. The
Evil Emperor spoke approvingly about "killing the leader of al Shabaab". Actually,
as I’ve said here, the killed man, Godane was a factional boss of a divided
movement, and had had several of his rivals murdered in the past. In fact,
Godane’s extremism had alienated a lot of Somalis who might have had a better
opinion of al Shabaab but for him, and murdering him could very easily increase
the appeal of the movement. Such a nuance, of course, is far too
much for all but a miniscule minority of Americans to even begin to comprehend,
and I’m not faulting the Prizident for not mentioning something which would fly
far above the heads of almost all his listeners anyway.

What
I noticed, though, is that the Dronemaster avoided talking of how al Shabaab arose only because of the American and
Ethiopian invasion of Somalia in 2006 in the name of "fighting al
Qaeda". In fact, but for that invasion, Somalia would never have had a
radical Islamic insurgency. And, of course, even then, al Shabaab had nothing
at all to do with al Qaeda until much later when the latter had established
itself in Yemen, which again was facilitated by American support to the venal
government and its drone campaign.

“...strengthen the opposition as
the best counterweight to extremists like ISIL (sic)”.

He avoided
mentioning two interesting facts. First, that his "moderate opposition" is just as much a collection of cannibal headhunters, rapists,
child-killers and slavers as ISIS itself, and in many ways worse. And,
secondly, said “moderate opposition” – such of it that still exists – now makes
no attempt to hide the fact that it is, actually, allied with ISIS and shares
weapons and finances with it.

Talking about killing children, can one
swallow the instinctive nausea rush over Dronester’s silence over his
Zionistani allies murdering the children of Gaza? Can even Americans ignore that?

6. Still on Syria, according to the
Warmonger in Chief, Assad has “lost legitimacy”. This statement, of course, is
nothing new as far as Washington is concerned, but makes two fascinating
omissions. The first one is that ISIS didn’t exactly appear out of thin air. The
conditions for its rise were created precisely by the American Empire itself,
by stoking the embers of the terrorist campaign in Syria, by arming and training
the so-called opposition. And we’ve seen in Libya – which the Winner of the
Nobel Peace Prize was careful not to
mention – what happens when the “moderate opposition” takes over.

The other omission he makes is the clear
fact that the only force capable of beating ISIS is the Syrian Arab Army, the
same government army which he claims has “lost legitimacy” and “terrorises its
citizens”. The ultimate aim of the Empire is the
overthrow of the government of Syria and the disintegration of that country
into a Libya-like conglomeration of bitterly opposed ministates, which can be
exploited or ignored as convenient.

Since the American Empire intends to
bomb Syria – again, something I predicted months ago – without the Syrian
government’s permission, it’s only a matter of time before it moves over to
bombing Syrian military targets. The groundwork is already being laid. One
justification will be that Assad must not be allowed to “grow too strong” and
so must be attacked. The other justification will be that if Syrian army
installations on the front line are not destroyed,
they will be overrun and their equipment captured by ISIS, so they have to be
bombed and obliterated in advance.

If Syria refuses to allow unilateral
American bombing of its territory, it will be bombed anyway, and directly –
because it’s stopping America from bombing ISIS. In other words, the Nobel
Peace Prize Awardee’s final plan is to bomb Syria, whatever happens.

7. The Emperor of Evil spoke
of how ISIS

“...In acts of barbarism...
took the lives of two American journalists - Jim Foley and Steven Sotloff.”

I wonder if the
hypocrisy meter – even by Drone Man standards – broke on that point. Even if we
assume the beheading videos of Foley and Sotloff are genuine, something which
is very far from a foregone conclusion, neither of these two was exactly a
journalist in the traditional sense; they were, as I mentioned here, just combatants under another name. Both had embedded themselves with the
so-called “opposition” (in the case of Foley in Libya earlier as well), and
Sotloff, for one, was photographed playing around with a DShK heavy machine gun
on the back of a “rebel” truck.

Sotloff’s own family has stated that he was
sold to ISIS by the same “moderate opposition” Drone Man is so eager to arm,
train and fund even more than he already is; the same “moderate opposition”
whose “vetted members” go straight from CIA camps to join ISIS. As for Foley's mother, she said she was threatened with prosecution if she attempted to pay a ransom to get her son freed.

You'd almost think the Empire wanted these two men beheaded.

8. If
the hypocrisy meter wasn’t broken by that statement, it surely must have taken
another hit from the Nobel Peace Prizident’s claim that

“we will redouble our efforts to cut
off its funding”

I’d love to see him start by cutting off his
own funding of the “moderate opposition”, and by, say, attacking the primary
source of jihadist funds in the world, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Want to bet
when that’s going to happen?

9. Though
it didn’t feature in his speech, it seems from other sources that apparently
the Owner of the Planet Earth intends to launch a three year war against ISIS. This figure interested me. Why
"three years"? Who came up with this time frame? I could think up
only one answer. This: in two years, unless the law is changed in some manner
to allow him to continue (far from a remote possibility in today’s Amerikastan),
the Emperor will have to demit office. So – whatever mess is left after that in the War on
ISIS will be his successor's fault.

10. There
were a few other lies along the way, of course, because if Barack Hussein Obama
can find an opportunity to tell a lie he can’t possibly pass it up. So, we
have:

“It is America that has rallied the
world against Russian aggression, and in support of the Ukrainian peoples'
right to determine their own destiny.”

That
must have gone down very well with the Eastern Ukrainians who were being
shelled by Obama’s Nazis, and with the Western Ukrainians who have seen their
pensions cut in half under the oligarch regime installed in the EU/US organised
coup in February. Of course, it also fails to mention that the Evil Empire has, actually lost, and lost hugely, in Ukraine.

Like
it or not, though, the Dronemaster gambled in Ukraine, and lost. He needs a war
to appease his military-industrial complex backers, and also distract his
people's attention. Since the latter, in any case, have the attention span of a
mayfly with ADHD, in three months' time they won't even remember Ukraine exists...until it’s time to remind them.

Another
lie-in-passing was this:

‘ When we helped prevent the massacre
of civilians trapped on a distant mountain, here's what one of them said.
"We owe our American friends our lives. Our children will always remember
that there was someone who felt our struggle and made a long journey to protect
innocent people." ‘

Quite naturally, the truth was somewhat different. There were only a few people on “that
mountain” and, far from falling over themselves praising Amerikastan, they said
they had no intention of moving, thanks.

Let
me issue another warning: the "war against ISIS" can be used to cook
up invasions elsewhere in the globe against other groups which can be called ISIS. Like, say, Boko Haram, for
instance, in Nigeria; and Ebola, which Obama also threw in a mention of, is a
handy excuse for sending forces to “protect personnel” in Africa.

And once they
are there, they’ll stay there as long as the resources to be exploited last.

Of
course Drone Man’s war plans will not succeed. But they are not meant to
succeed. In the schemes of the Warstate, it’s only a perpetual war that
matters.

That’s
where the money lies, and money is the only thing ideologically blank war criminals like Barack Obama follow.

Well, of course the (ig)Nobel piece Prizident WILL bomb Syria or any other country, portion of a country his masters tell him to send bombs/drones.We know this will happen because........wait for it.........the US of A is an"exceptional" country. It is THE "indispensable" nation. We KNOW this because we have all been told so, repeatedly. Why, there are actually some humans who really believe that absolute bullshit! Oh, and guess what? Not all of the humans who buy this sack of horse manure are totally brain dead, Faux Noise watchers, or "Honey Boo-boo addicts even. Some actually have real college degrees, in what I have no idea, but they claim to have such paper work, and a few even show up on US of A TV channels to spew even more outrageous crapola of the variety spewed by the drone king; aka, Gobomber, aka, the (ig)Nobel piece Prizident.To say that this old, broken down, former US Marine/Vietnam war vet is highly pissed off at what has become of the country of his birth (I am referring to ME here) would be a hugely gross understatement. Not only has the drone king set himself up as THE ruler of the entire world, he is quickly turning the US of A into a total police state. Well, I'd say the US of A is living an old Chinese "curse". The one that goes something like this; "May you live in 'interesting' times." I'd say that "interesting times" is another gross understatement, regards to the US of A and its ram[aging bully boy tactics as seen since at least the time of "saint" Ronnie of Raygun. One could say the bully boy shirt began in 1946, with the end of WW2. Korea was the first unfortunate "experiment" in 'Merikkkan "exceptionalism" and we see how that "ended"(?) in a draw that it still NOT really ended. There exists a truce, NOT a peace treaty, therefore, a resumption of war in Korea will not be a "bolt from the blue", it would just mean that a truce would be broken, big deal, look at how many such "truces" have been made and broken by the zionist entity with/against the Palestinians. The US of A has become more and more like the vile zionist entity by the hour now. 'Merikkka, what a country.With apologies to Steppenwolf; "America, where are you now? Don't you care about your sons and daughters? Don't you know, we need you now. We can't fight alone against the monster."Keep on telling the truth Bill. I'll keep doing the same at my own small blog.

I'm actually really torn on this. You hate Obama, which I agree with you on. But you support terrorists who murder innocents on a mass scale (muslim and nonmuslim). Part of me hopes that you and everyone who agrees with you kills themselves in a mass suicide pact. I really think the world would be a better place without pinko commie liberals (in fact, with the death toll of commie liberals in excess of 50million, I know the world would be a better place). But man, you certainly can rip apart one of your own pinko commie liberals brothers named Barack Hussein Obama. Granted, you might be a true believer, a perfect useful idiot (until the long knives come out), but I'm guessing you just hate Obama because his narcissism overwhelms his true-believer status. You liberals are a diabolical enigma.

Full comment moderation is enabled on this site, which means that your comment will only be visible after the blog administrator (in other words, yours truly) approves it. The purpose of this is not to censor dissenting viewpoints; in fact, such viewpoints are welcome, though it may lead to challenges to provide sources and/or acerbic replies (I do not tolerate stupidity).

The purpose of this moderation is to eliminate spam, of which this blog attracts an inordinate amount. Spammers, be warned: it takes me less time to delete your garbage than it takes for you to post it.