He is indeed just trolling. If you pull up his posting history, you'll notice that he has no idea about any political subject, he has no idea about the current events. He hears soundbytes, then enters the fora and starts trolling with idiotic comments like; "Oh yeah, you never heard of whites that do that?!" or typical "you're so old, and you have herpes, I saw it in your pictures, and your wife wants a black cock"

Shrug...

Username hidden
(17355 posts)

User Details are only visible to members.

Glad you over-looked Comanche's "fact-filled"post, as well as yours here.

And here:

"roflmao........... And most Liberals like to take it up the ass.

You're ridiculous.

"Shhhhh.......the adults are having a conversation."

Milwaukee WI

Username hidden
(2296 posts)

User Details are only visible to members.

"says the guy that carries a backpack of oxygen... "

no substance, just trolling.

Pittsburgh PA

Username hidden
(18259 posts)

User Details are only visible to members.

Says the guy that carries a backpack of oxygen...

Milwaukee WI

Username hidden
(2296 posts)

User Details are only visible to members.

How does anybody as stupid as Biden remember to breath.

Spring Branch TX

Username hidden
(324 posts)

User Details are only visible to members.

Your morning laugh LOL

BIDEN ON SELF-DEFENSE: FIRE A SHOTGUN IN THE AIR

On Tuesday, Vice President Joe Biden appeared on a Facebook townhall, where he was asked a question about gun ownership by a female viewer from Parent Magazine. Biden’s suggestion: nobody needs an AR-15, especially women. Instead, he stated, “If you want to protect yourself, get a double-barrel shotgun.” In fact, Biden went further, describing his strategy for home defense: I said, 'Jill, if there's ever a problem, just walk out on the balcony here ... walk out and put that double-barrel shotgun and fire two blasts outside the house.’ … You don't need an AR-15 — it's harder to aim, it's harder to use, and in fact you don't need 30 rounds to protect yourself. Buy a shotgun! Buy a shotgun!

There are a few problems with this. First, it is illegal to discharge a firearm in public in Delaware, as it is in virtually every state. Shooting a gun into the air would arguably not constitute self-defense and poses a threat to the public, especially since a slug would come down at some point. Second, if you have a typical double-barreled shotgun, the gun only holds two shells. If you fire twice into the air, you have just disarmed yourself. Third, shotguns are used in more murders every year in the United States than the rifles the left wants to ban. Fourth, for Biden to suggest that women are incapable of handling AR-15s, even as the Obama administration pushes women into frontline military combat, is ridiculous to say the least. Leave it to Joe Biden to repeatedly undermine his own gun control case – and to get basic self-defense with a shotgun wrong.

Berryville VA

Username hidden
(1750 posts)

User Details are only visible to members.

Facts are cities that have been under long time Dem. rule are mostly shit holes. FACT!

Berryville VA

Username hidden
(1750 posts)

User Details are only visible to members.

NorCal, ever heard of NY? Why do you think that the party matters in how a city's specific crimes take place. Take your favorite big "repub" city, and they have problems as well. Are you saying that once a Repub enters office, everything gets better? Are you really that blinded by bias?

Milwaukee WI

Username hidden
(2296 posts)

User Details are only visible to members.

Chicago is our nations example of what happens when the liberals are allowed to run a large city while ignoring our constitutional rights and promoting the numerous entitlement programs. Is this what we want the rest of our nation to look like????? Excuses, very high violent death rates, political corruption at the local and national level originating from and encouraged by the local liberal political machine. Chicago is the land of total social mayhem is the direct result of democratic/liberal/socialist policies that have been implemented over decades and remain unchecked to this day. It will not get better because the criminal element is to well entrenched politically in that city. Take a look at the new mayor there. Follow closely his policies and city numbers under his reign. It is going to be interesting to watch him continue to fail to make that place civilized. Chicago is one of those places that is self made by people from Chicago. I see no reason to pay for their self made problems, pay for the lack of jobs and poverty they have created for their own people by their own people. Jobs are leaving Illinois almost as fast as they are leaving California. Keep voting democrat it pays,,,, for others in other business friendly states.

Red Bluff CA

Username hidden
(438 posts)

User Details are only visible to members.

MILLER: Obama’s real gun-control aim Chicago shows that more gun laws lead to more crime

By Emily Miller-The Washington Times Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Chicago is a dangerous town, but gun control hasn’t made it better. The city forbids the law-abiding from having guns, leaving the bad guys to rule the streets. The result is one of the highest murder rates in the country. President Obama’s plan isn’t to reverse from a failed course, but to apply federal gun registration and confiscation of certain weapons nationwide.

Addressing students at Hyde Park Academy last week, Mr. Obama recalled the recent murder of Hadiya Pendleton, a teenager. “It’s not unique to Chicago,” he said. “It’s not unique to this country. Too many of our children are being taken away from us.”

The rising homicide rate actually is unique to the president’s hometown. The 506 murders last year reflected a 16 percent increase over the previous year. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, this happened while the rest of the country saw a 2 percent decrease in homicides; the national rate is at its lowest point since 1963.

Mr. Obama reiterated his legislative priorities: bans on the so-called assault weapon and high-capacity magazine, and background checks for every private gun exchange. However, it’s not as if the president really believes these bills would do anything to reduce crime or prevent mass shootings.

The National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action acquired a research document prepared last month by the Justice Department’s research arm, the National Institute of Justice. The report, titled “Summary of Select Firearm Violence Prevention Strategies,” explains that a “complete elimination of assault weapons would not have a large impact on gun homicides.” It further noted banning guns with certain scary-looking features “could be effective” if the government outlawed all existing firearms, and bought them all.

Similarly, the Justice report asserts that the only way to achieve the “goal to reduce the lethality of guns” with a ban on magazines over 10 rounds would be by a “massive reduction in supply.” It recommends not “grandfathering” the hundreds of millions of existing magazines, but implementing an “extensive buyback” program. Even then, it would “take decades to realize.”

In a speech on Thursday, Wayne LaPierre of the National Rifle Association said the president’s true agenda with his “universal background check” proposal was “the national registration of every single gun owner in the country.” The Justice Department memo recommends the creation of a national gun registry to make background checks for private gun sales useful for the government.

The report says registering every gun purchase in the country would “increase owner responsibility,” enable “monitoring” of multiple gun purchases in a short period of time and “improve law enforcement’s ability to retrieve guns from owners” prohibited from possessing firearms. That’s code for confiscation.

The National Institute of Justice did not respond to questions about who in the administration asked for the research and whether it was given to the White House.

The document puts the administration’s plans into context. Mr. Obama and his allies want to know who owns every single gun in this country, and if they think a gun is scary looking, they will take it away.

Emily Miller is a senior editor for the Opinion pages at The Washington Times.