Ovechkin was far too inconsistent in their playoff round. Who knows if that will balance out over his playoff career, but as of now he still has a lot to prove. And he disagreed with me when I said Malkin had more to prove, so thats the same, and its incorrect.

Idoit40fans wrote:And he disagreed with me when I said Malkin had more to prove, so thats the same, and its incorrect.

You said it as if he had said he thought Crosby had more prove and he was correct in denying that

I really don't care about that though, but agree with him that Malkin has defenitely proved himself as a playoff performer. His disapperance was so blatantly obvious it must've been because of illness/injury, which later was confirmed.

But seriously, I never said Malkin was a playoff no-show or that Ovie was for that matter. But Sid has shown far more than either of the other two.

He has produced over a full, long playoff run, yes. The way Malkin played in the first two series, however, tells me without a doubt he had done the same had he been healthy. That is a speculative argument though, so yeah Sid has proven more in the playoffs. I wouldn't say "far more" though =)

Seriously, I am not crzymike. I do share some of the opinions he shared in that we are both HUGE Malkin supporters. As for Brodeur, he is an elite goaltender who has not lost a single step. He is/will be the best g-tender in NHL history.

Idoit40fans wrote:And he disagreed with me when I said Malkin had more to prove, so thats the same, and its incorrect.

You said it as if he had said he thought Crosby had more prove and he was correct in denying that

I really don't care about that though, but agree with him that Malkin has defenitely proved himself as a playoff performer. His disapperance was so blatantly obvious it must've been because of illness/injury, which later was confirmed.

Exactly. I want Idoit to show me where I said Malkin has less to prove than Sid. I simply said that Malkin has been a pretty good player when the stakes are raised. I'm not agreeing nor disagreeing with you Idoit. I smiply believe that Gino has done admirably well and answered a lot of questions last season.. But God forbid anyone complimenting Malkin anymore.

Does everything good that is being said about 71 have to turn into a comparison between Gino and Sid? We are all lucky to have them both on our side for hopefully a long time. And once again, they are two of the best in the world in their own ways.

Idoit40fans wrote:hahaha it is crzymike fa sho. It is the exact same circular argument as occurred with him.

I'm pretty sure you're right. I've been suspecting it for days but didn't want to be a drama starter. (There's also another newer poster here who I'm fairly sure is someone who was banned - based on their posting style - but I'm waiting for more evidence [some Whitney discussion ] before I say anything.)

Idoit40fans wrote:hahaha it is crzymike fa sho. It is the exact same circular argument as occurred with him.

I'm pretty sure you're right. I've been suspecting it for days but didn't want to be a drama starter. (There's also another newer poster here who I'm fairly sure is someone who was banned - based on their posting style - but I'm waiting for more evidence [some Whitney discussion ] before I say anything.)

Idoit40fans wrote:hahaha it is crzymike fa sho. It is the exact same circular argument as occurred with him.

I'm pretty sure you're right. I've been suspecting it for days but didn't want to be a drama starter. (There's also another newer poster here who I'm fairly sure is someone who was banned - based on their posting style - but I'm waiting for more evidence [some Whitney discussion ] before I say anything.)

I have no problem with being that person.

Me and crzymike used to agree on things related to Malkin, I'll give you that

crzymike and I used to agree on a ton of things, and yet he'd start arguments about them of which the entire time I was agreeing with him while he was arguing with me as if I were saying the opposite. This time I made a statement then the person responded to me for saying it with something dressed as a disagreement, but then their argument allowed for my statement to be true. Sounds very familiar

Idoit40fans wrote:crzymike and I used to agree on a ton of things, and yet he'd start arguments about them of which the entire time I was agreeing with him while he was arguing with me as if I were saying the opposite. This time I made a statement then the person responded to me for saying it with something dressed as a disagreement, but then their argument allowed for my statement to be true. Sounds very familiar

Idoit40fans wrote:crzymike and I used to agree on a ton of things, and yet he'd start arguments about them of which the entire time I was agreeing with him while he was arguing with me as if I were saying the opposite. This time I made a statement then the person responded to me for saying it with something dressed as a disagreement, but then their argument allowed for my statement to be true. Sounds very familiar

Cheap Seats wrote:It's 4 games! Give it a break. Everybody should take their black a gold goggles off once in a while. Sid is the best passer in the game today, his vision is incredible. However, he has made bad passes in the past too. I have seen Sid make at least one bad pass in nearly every game he has played in. Usually there are five or six great passes in teh same game that cover up the mistake and so far this season we have not seen that.

Relax, it'll all come together. As Letang said last week, "This powerplay is going to go for like 3-3 one night and we'll all have the confidence."

Idoit40fans wrote:Im just an average man, with an average lifeI work from nine to five, hey hell, I pay the priceall I want is to be left alone, in my average homebut why do I always feel, like Im in the twilight zone