Tuesday, July 18, 2006

Pro-terrorist groups banned, threaten terrorism

Two UK-based Islamist groups are to become the first to be banned under laws outlawing the glorification of terrorism, the home secretary has said.

John Reid said he was taking action against Al-Ghurabaa and the Saved Sect...

Speaking on BBC News 24, Anjem Choudary, spokesman for Al-Ghurabaa, was asked whether his organisation would defend a suicide attack on British soil.

"We've always been on record as saying that we have a covenant of security in Britain," he said.

"We are not allowed to target anyone in this country because we live with them. Our life and wealth is protected.

"But I feel that with these new laws which are now being introduced, if you are going to ban ideological and political movements like Al-Ghurabaa and the Saved Sect, then that situation, I think, is going to be affected."

Lock them up when they threaten violence. If they form new groups, ban those too. Take away their benefits, disrupt their activities and make life so hard they leave the country. There are plenty of Islamic states in the world - let them try their luck in one of those, the fuckers.

Banned? Again? Mr Choudary's lackeys will have to amend the headers and footers of their propaganda docs again.

This banning order is simply a cosmetic exercise. Or more accurately, like that bit in Airplane where everyone is panicking and the bird with the big tits appears front and centre, no more than a distraction.

The cats out of the bag after Martin Brights' expose. Mr Reid ought to take a stroll down the corridors of the FO and FCO. He'd certainly gain more respect after he pistol-whips a few of the fuckers there.

People should be allowed to air abhorrent views, yes, but members of these groups back their demands to be heard with not-so-subtle threats of terrorist violence. Where does one draw the line between free speech and appeasement? Should the name “Londonistan” be a source of pride for free speech advocates?

i agree DFH. but in my view, restrictions on freedom of speech should only be imposed when the government declares that the country is officially "at war". they havent done so - but instead are steadily chipping away at our freedoms and liberties (to such an extent that i'm half seriously thinking about emigrating to the USA)

one should bear in mind that whatever the government taketh away, the government never gives back.

charles martel - I got the hell out. There will come a point when there are so many qualified middle class emigrants leaving Britain that they will start to limit the amounts of money you can take with you. The professional British (now, alas, also including Indian immigrants who, having succeeded in Britain, now don't see their futures in Britain) emigrant as opposed uneducated, un-English-speaking immigrants imported to be a bride/groom of a first cousin - themselves the products of generations of incestuous marriages is already tipped. Go to Immigration Watch.

They need the money of the productive to feed adherents of an alien religion which has never known free enterprise, capitalism or independence - just the tribe and its laws.

If you're going, go now. Believe me, if the socialists get back in, they will start limiting Britons in how much of their own money they can remove from Britain. Meaning, they will make it impossible to start a new life elsewhere.

Even if you're only contemplating going, get your money the hell out now. If the bankrupt socialists get back in, they will find ways to confiscate it from you if you try to get out.