WordscopeLooking for the accurate translation of a word in context?Wordscope has indexed thousands of quality sites to help you!

Opinions from our customers and partners«Wordscope is an essential tool for our service! It consists of a huge, multilingual database in which we can find the information necessary for all good translations in context.»

Stijn De SmeytereCoordinator of the Translation and Interpretation Service

158.3 If, at any time after receiving the report of custody and before the person in custody is brought before a military judge, the custody review officer no longer believes that the grounds to retain the person in custody exist, the custody review officer shall direct that the person be released from custody.

158.3 If, at any time after receiving the report of custody and before the person in custody is brought before a military judge, the custody review officer no longer believes that the grounds to retain the person in custody exist, the custody review officer shall direct that the person be released from custody.

159.1 When the person retained in custody is taken before a military judge, the military judge shall direct that the person be released from custody unless counsel for the Canadian Forces, or in the absence of counsel a person appointed by the custody review officer, shows cause why the continued retention of the person in custody is justified or why any other direction under this Division should be made.

(2) If the person in custody shows cause why the person’s retention in custody is not justified, the military judge shall direct that the person be released from custody on giving any undertaking to comply with any of the conditions referred to in section 158.6 that the military judge considers appropriate, unless the person in custody shows cause why the giving of an undertaking is not justified.

159.1 When the person retained in custody is taken before a military judge, the military judge shall direct that the person be released from custody unless counsel for the Canadian Forces, or in the absence of counsel a person appointed by the custody review officer, shows cause why the continued retention of the person in custody is justified or why any other direction under this Division should be made.

3. Without prejudice to paragraph 2 (a), where the executing State considers it necessary in view of the person’s age or physical or mental condition, the opportunity to state the opinion on the temporary transfer shall be given to the legal representative of the person in custody.

1. An EIO may be issued for the temporary transfer of a person in custody in the executing State for the purpose of carrying out an investigative measure with a view to gathering evidence for which the presence of that person on the territory of the issuing State is required, provided that he shall be sent back within the period stipulated by the executing State.

1. An EIO may be issued for the temporary transfer of a person in custody in the executing State for the purpose of carrying out an investigative measure with a view to gathering evidence for which the presence of that person on the territory of the issuing State is required, provided that he shall be sent back within the period stipulated by the executing State.

3. Without prejudice to paragraph 2(a), where the executing State considers it necessary in view of the person's age or physical or mental condition, the opportunity to state the opinion on the temporary transfer shall be given to the legal representative of the person in custody.

Although it is not possible to provide an exhaustive list of such circumstances, particularly because of the varied and evolving nature of the rules of EU law governing the area of freedom, security and justice, a national court or tribunal may, for example, consider submitting a request for the urgent preliminary ruling procedure to be applied in the case, referred to in the fourth paragraph of Article 267 TFEU, of a person in custody or deprived of his liberty, where the answer to the question raised is decisive as to the assessment of that person's legal situation, or in proceedings concerning parental authority or custody of young ch ...[+++]ildren, where the identity of the court having jurisdiction under EU law depends on the answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling.

Although it is not possible to provide an exhaustive list of such circumstances, particularly because of the varied and evolving nature of the rules of European Union law governing the area of freedom, security and justice, a national court or tribunal might, for example, consider submitting a request for the urgent preliminary ruling procedure to be applied in the case, referred to in the fourth paragraph of Article 267 TFEU, of a person in custody or deprived of his liberty, where the answer to the question raised is decisive as to the assessment of that person’s legal situation, or in proceedings concerning parental authority or custo ...[+++]dy of children, where the identity of the court having jurisdiction under European Union law depends on the answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling.

Under this proposal, asylum applications by minors, accompanied by the person who has custody of them, are automatically considered in the same State as the asylum application of the person with custody.

(c) Should the executing authority be allowed to remand the suspected person in custody in the event of non-compliance with an obligation under a supervision measure and detain him or her until the trial takes place or should this authority return the suspect immediately to the issuing authority?

Although it is not possible to provide an exhaustive list of such circumstances, particularly because of the varied and evolving nature of the rules of European Union law governing the area of freedom, security and justice, a national court or tribunal might, for example, consider submitting a request for the urgent preliminary ruling procedure to be applied in the case, referred to in the fourth paragraph of Article 267 TFEU, of a person in custody or deprived of his liberty, where the answer to the question raised is decisive as to the assessment of that person’s legal situation, or in proceedings concerning parental authority or custo ...[+++]dy of children, where the identity of the court having jurisdiction under European Union law depends on the answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling.

All information and content displayed on this site (“Content”) is the property of their respective owners. This “Content” is provided to you “as is” and you agree to use it at your own risk. We assume no liability for the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of this information. For any matter concerning the site or its use, including any dispute, only Belgian law will apply, and only the courts of Brussels will have jurisdiction. By using the site, you thereby accept all the conditions of use.