New Titanfall screenshots (direct-feed)

Here are some new direct-feed screenshots of Titanfall from the E3 demo. The game is currently rumored to not be running at full 1080p at the moment which might explain the lower resolution and muddy textures.
(PC, TitanFall, Xbox 360, Xbox One)

Some of you are blind. Killzone 2 and Dust 514 look better? Give me a break. Titan Fall isn't the best looking next gen game, but it is still better looking than current generation games.

Go read Digital Foundry's tech analysis. Yes, it's weak in certain areas, but it's still using graphical techniques that only the very most advanced games on consoles used this generation and a few techniques that have only really been used on high end PC games.

Also remember this game is running at twice the framerate as something like Killzone Shadow Fall. It looks about 80% as good as KZSF, but it is also rendering 100% more frames. That's still a respectable accomplishment.

This is a MULTIPLAYER ONLY title. Of course the graphics aren't going to look as good as other single player next-gen games. For those saying it looks like current generation, try comparing the graphics to CoD or Halo's multiplayer and you'll see how amazing Titanfall's graphics is.

It even looks way better than Crysis 3's multiplayer (one of the best looking games of this gen). Don't you get it?

I don't get why people are harping over this game. It's a first person Starhawk with Call of Duty's engine. This game will fail due to it having to compete with both Battlfield and Call of Duty. Battlfield has got a respectable fanbase now even the number of COD players is still up there. But Titanfall is simply COD with jetpacks and robots. Quite unoriginal. But it's making me more irksome seeing all these people harping over it like its Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. Oh and now there's Destiny which is doing something incredibly revolutionary and broadening upon the gameplay of Borderlands. So I can't see why ANYONE would pick up this COD clone next to actual COD/ Battlfield/ and Destiny.

The mechs and jet packs from starhawk. The ugliest engine in the world from COD. Which is now almost 6 years old.

Killzone is a different type of fps. That's why I didn't mention it in this comparison. No other fps plays like Killzone. Kind off like how no other game plays like Halo besides maybe Destiny because I see a lot of similarities. But Killzone is doing something different this time around and their goal is to create a technically beautiful game as an fps. Hopefully the story and multiplayer get better too, but I have faith in Guerrilla games. But tell me Titanfall doesn't look/play exactly like COD but with Mechs and Jetpacks. I hate ignorant gamers like that. Talk shit about COD being the same every year, then defending Nintendo because "new characters doesn't make a new ip, new experiences does" which is bullshit they're just afraid none of their games will sell if Mario isnt attached to it. We as gamers should be pushing devs to make games like Destiny, The Last of Us, and the Division. Not this Titanfall dribble which looks like COD with one of their $15 map packs. Disagree all you want. But there is truth to what I'm saying.

Destiny nothing new? A broader vision of Borderlands a seamless co op experience that evolves with other players around you. Tell me one game like it. Killzone it trying something new to what it was doing before. The Last of Us use familiar elements from different games to create a fresh experience, tell me a game like The Last of Us. If Titanfall hits in the holidays it'll be condemned to compete with the next COD/ Star Wars Battlefront/ The Division and other unannounced titles that would appeal to the average COD player. For Titanfall to succeed it must release in Q1-Q3 and avoid Q4 all together. This way COD: Ghosts or Battlefield 4 players will be tempted to migrate to Titanfall before the holiday 2014 titles hit.

destiny is like defiance it an mmo shooter thats it. killzone isn't breaking bread. The last of us is like old school survival horror. I am alive even though a arcade game was more survival with limited resources

nothing in recent years is new except maybe tablet style games.Which isnt major gaming. I cant think of any games like angry bird or cut the rope from when I was younger.

I just saw pictures of Titanfall on other sites and they look much better than these for some reason. Like the author explained these are low resolution...very low resolution. I just hope it wasn't done intentionally since it is the favored game of the next gen.

Why does everyone want the game to be graphics first, everything else later? I'd rather have the graphics held back and have a really smooth shooter with 60 frames per second, or higher if that's what they aim for. Graphics are overrated, I'll take a good game over a pretty one any day.

I'm not excited for Titanfall, I keep trying to be but I think my gaming preferences have changed over the last couple years. No single player actually bothers me now. I use to just jump online and never play campaigns but I think I have online multiplayer fatigue from all the shooters every year.

Destiny looks and plays just like Halo. The guns even sound like Halo. The environments are copied and pasted from Halo. Don't get me wrong Halo is great but this game is a duplicate with slightly better graphics. This is Halo with a new name just to have an excuse to be brought to all the consoles and make more money.

One thing that I'm most curious about is that most games that use the Source engine, end up having a similar feel to Half-Life (Not a bad thing). But since the Source engine is HIGHLY modular I wonder how far of a departure they're going to be able to get out of it.

@thelastofgen I did not state the E3 TF demo was CGI dude. These screenshots shown look nothing like the E3 demo MS showed us, I just went back and watched it. The demo looks sharp, with no shadow jaggies (as seen in the cockpit view). The demo defitnity didnt have any poor textures as shown in these screenshots. Either these are 360 visuals or MS conned us with showing it running on a high end PC.

Hence my reference to the infamous Killzone 2 debacale of E3 2005. I am just shocked by thess screenshots.

i don't care about the graphics is the mech vs mech combat im exited for,i haven't play a online mech game since mechassault 2 lone wolf and for a game running on a modified old engine is looking great.

I know people will claim that the game looks like this because its rendering at 1080P at 60FPS but Battlefield 4 does the same thing and it looks much better than this.

Edit: Anyways isn't this game using the cloud to improve the visuals 3 times over an offline Xbox One? If so then the cloud features of the Xbox One disappoint me because it should be much better than this.

They're using the Source engine because making a new engine takes time and money. Dice had time and a team working on the Frostbite engine for years and updating it so comparing it to BF4 makes you look retarded.

And the Cloud was designed to offload certain things not improve visuals 3 times over an offline X1. They just said it gives 3 times the power but having Dedicated Servers allows them to offload A.I onto the servers which gives them bit more freedom in the shipped product.

Cloud could be a complete gimmick for all I care because "Dedicated Servers for all Multiplayer games" is more than enough for me to pick up an X1 for games like Titanfall.

P.S don't compare a game like BF4 that's more like a Battlefield 3.5 to something that's new and innovative based on graphical appeal.

i have to agree with you the gfx part the games at e3 wasnt really impressive, but they did look fun. and i hated whoever was playing infamous he sucked and didnt show anything off, im surprise everyone was impressed by that. seriously who constantly shoots in infamous, you usually chain moves and your powers together it was a waste of a video. with all that shoot he was better off with a gun in his hand