The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government.
Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating.
Read our disclaimer for details.

Fugl Meyer Assessment (Upper extremity) of motor recovery following stroke [ Time Frame: assessed at one baseline session (day 4), and then again immediately following the last day of the intervention (day 18), 2 weeks (day 32), 1 month, 3 months and 6 months later. ]

Main primary outcome is change in score between the baseline session score and day 32.

Functional independence scale (MIF) [ Time Frame: assessed at one baseline session (day 4), and then again immediately following the last day of the intervention (day 18), 2 weeks (day 32), 1 month, 3 months and 6 months later. ]

We are looking for a change in scores between the baseline session score, and those collected during each follow-up session.

Motor Activity Log (MAL) [ Time Frame: assessed at one baseline session (day 4), and then again immediately following the last day of the intervention (day 18), 2 weeks (day 32), 1 month, 3 months and 6 months later. ]

We are looking for a change in scores between the baseline session score, and those collected during each follow-up session.

Jebsen Taylor Hand function test (JTT) [ Time Frame: assessed at one baseline session (day 4), and then again immediately following the last day of the intervention (day 18), 2 weeks (day 32), 1 month, 3 months and 6 months later. ]

We are looking for a change in scores between the baseline session score, and those collected during each follow-up session.

Box and block test (BBT) [ Time Frame: assessed at one baseline session (day 4), and then again immediately following the last day of the intervention (day 18), 2 weeks (day 32), 1 month, 3 months and 6 months later. ]

We are looking for a change in scores between the baseline session score, and those collected during each follow-up session.

Modified Ashworth Scale [ Time Frame: assessed at one baseline session (day 4), and then again immediately following the last day of the intervention (day 18), 2 weeks (day 32), 1 month, 3 months and 6 months later. ]

We are looking for a change in scores between the baseline session score, and those collected during each follow-up session.

Testing motor MRC [ Time Frame: assessed at one baseline session (day 4), and then again immediately following the last day of the intervention (day 18), 2 weeks (day 32), 1 month, 3 months and 6 months later. ]

We are looking for a change in scores between the baseline session score, and those collected during each follow-up session.

Previous research that utilises single sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have demonstrated functional improvements. However these improvements are usually short-lived, lasting less than one hour before the patient's performance returns to baseline. In these studies, tDCS is typically applied with the goal of adaptively enhancing functional activation of pathologically under-active tissue or suppressing pathologically over-active tissue. Interestingly, a small body of evidence is now emerging to indicate that tDCS can improve learning/memory functions in healthy controls. The goal of this study is to test if the application of tDCS could enhance learning and/or memory for physiotherapy rehabilitation, which may in turn lead to correspondingly greater motor improvement. Patients at a subacute stage (1 to 6 month post stroke) will attend for 10 consecutive daily sessions of tDCS.

This research has important implications; previous studies suggest that such an approach has the potential to facilitate physical rehabilitation post-stroke and establish tDCS as a clinically viable rehabilitative tool. Recovery of motor skills may take many months to acquire and therefore strategies that have the potential to enhance acquisition of skill are of practical and scientific interest.

tDCS applied to the motor cortex every day of two consecutive weeks (10 sessions) at 1 mA during 20 minutes. Conductive rubber covered by sponges soaked in saline will be used, held in place by a band. The current will be gradually increased over 100 seconds.

Other Name: Eldith DC-Stimulator (CE certified)

Device: Sham tDCS

Participants will receive sham tDCS over the primary motor cortex of the ipsilesional hemisphere during 20 minutes of motor training (10 consecutive sessions Monday-Friday during two weeks).

Study Arms

Sham Comparator: Sham tDCS and motor training: sham comparator

Participants will receive sham tDCS over the primary motor cortex of the ipsilesional hemisphere during 20 minutes of motor training (10 consecutive sessions Monday-Friday during two weeks).

Intervention: placebo tDCS Other: Motor Training

Intervention: Device: Sham tDCS

Experimental: Anodal tDCS and motor training: experimental

Participants will receive anodal tDCS over the primary motor cortex of the ipsilesional hemisphere. The following parameters will be used: stimulation intensity of 1mA during 20 minutes of motor training (10 consecutive sessions Monday-Friday during two weeks).

Interventions:

Device: anodal tDCS

Other: motor Training during physiotherapy

Intervention: Device: anodal tDCS (device) Eldith DC-Stimulator

Publications *

Not Provided

* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications
identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.

Recruitment Information

Recruitment Status ICMJE

Recruiting

Estimated Enrollment ICMJE

20

Estimated Completion Date

July 1, 2018

Estimated Primary Completion Date

July 1, 2018 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Eligibility Criteria ICMJE

Inclusion Criteria:

All subjects must be between the ages of 18-90 and must not be pregnant.

Patients volunteer to participate in the study, with a written informed consent signed