Open Borders Logo Contest

Sperglord, or Master Meta-Troll, Bryan “the moral and utilitarian thing to do is open the border to my rectum to any undersexed homosexuals so that Gross Domestic Penis is increased” Caplan is hosting an Open Borders Logo Contest. Naturally, the site was infiltrated with mischievous pranksters (Leroy Krune!). My favorite so far:

I think the funniest thing about the pranksters is how oblivious Team Autist appeared to be to their pet project getting tooled so blatantly. One of the Team Autist members, Rojas, “Liked” Krune’s obvious trolls multiple times.

If I were to design an Open Borders Logo, it would pack a little more visceral punch.

Would like to see unedited version of this. Made my first trip to Sweden back in the 90’s. Highly evolved in many ways. Now intent on suicide.

Sweden didn’t need John Calvin’s Willing Executioners to oversee their self-destruction but they seem to have got them anyways. (Shoot the fucker of a country make sure it’s dead?) Sweden was way too beautiful and successful. Allowing that place to survive and thrive might make one ask too many questions.

Maybe my hispanic background let me be more familiar with Latin America, but this is inaccurate and could be offensive to people from Argentina, Uruguay and the south of Brazil, since they are not Brown, they are White, i watch South American tv series from Colombia, Brazil or Argentina and they are like Italians or Spaniards living in South America, and certainly their countries aren’t attracting massive Brown immigration, only some few Brown Peruvians, Bolivians or Paraguayans can go to Argentina or Brazil.

In my native country, we are mostly Brown Amerindian, but the elite is mostly White European, they control the media, like Jews control United States, don’t believe Mexican telenovelas, Mexican women don’t look like that.

With same-sex fiance visas now the law we are going to see a deluge of lady-boys, bulldykes, and crypto-fags overwhelming our social capital. Less enlightened countries will be happy to offload their special people upon us, expediting their emmigration paperwork without the customary bribes. Gay activists in this country, appalled and outraged over the treatment of LGBT in foreign lands, will offer themselves up for matrimony to enable these victims to lap upon our shores. Within a decade we will be reeling from Lavender Crime Mobs who at first appeared wholesome but it turns out had grown up in more ruthless circumstances and were unable to abandon their survival instincts.

If/when it becomes the law of the land in California that TransGender kids are allowed to make their own determination as to which gender-specific Public Accomodation they will enter/participate in….. how do we game this? “Equal Protection of the Law”…. how do we game that for our own advantage?

This gets back to a general disagreement which I’ve been having with CH and to a certain extent with MK and GE – that the nihilism gets to a point where it just ain’t worth the effort to “combat” it anymore.

Heartiste says that ALL chicks can be gamed, fairly effortlessly, if you only know the right buttons to push.

And Matthew King and Greg Eliot say that ALL slights by would-be AMOGs need to be confronted and put down.

I think that maybe back circa the mid-1980s, maybe we could have still prevailed by going scorched earth on The Left – both at a micro level [using something like Game Theory in our personal interactions with at-risk chicks and with asshole-ish AMOGs] and also at a macro level [campaigns against leftist plots in television, keeping an eye on who gets tenure in the universities, guarding the public school curriculums with a vengeance, etc etc etc].

In retrospect, though, sometime circa 1992, when GHWB 41 had betrayed us on “No New Taxes”, and Ross Perot [for reasons that I still don’t understand] was determined to fuck up American politics beyond any and all possible recognition, we got a sociopathic, utterly amoral, pathologically-lying satyr in Bill Clinton as our new leader, and once he entered office, in January of 1993, the foundation for our final ruin started being laid.

Fast forward a couple of decades, to 2013, and I just don’t feel like we’ve got the excess capacity anymore to fight every single battle – it feels to me like we need to make a temporary retreat, withdraw from modernity*, and start prepping for The End Times.

I’ll give you an example now of the kind of hopeless nihilism which I’m talking about – the kind of nihilism which you just can’t combat with any sort of reason or inspiration or cajoling or wheedling or any-damned-thing-at-all – it’s a big new piece in “Time” magazine, extolling the virtues of the childless lifestyle:

THE CHILDFREE LIFE
What happens when having it all means not having children?

Now getting back to the utter futility of fighting hopeless battles: I have met chicks like this in my personal life – going back more than 20 years now – who simply wanted nothing whatsoever to do with birthing and nurturing and raising children.

Really cute, hot, skinny, fine, smart, well-edumakated chicks, with good jobs, with their finances in order, and with really great life prospects ahead of them.

But when it came to the question of going childless, no amount of needling or joking or whimsy or pleading could convince them otherwise.

They wanted their $1500 designer handbags and their $750 cowboy boots and their Mazda Miata sports cars and their brand new McMansions in the very toniest neighborhoods, and their 10-day vacations in the Bahamas, and nothing but NOTHING was going to be an obstruction to their enjoying every moment of free time to the absolute maximum of solipsistic self-worshipping bliss.

And talking to them was like talking to a God-damned brick wall.

Always, over and over again, the same conversation:

Q: “But don’t you want children?”

A: “Nope.”

Q: “But what about giving your folks some grandkids?”

A: “My sister has kids.”

Q: “But aren’t you worried about getting lonely?”

A: “Nope. See my niece and nephew once or twice a month, that’s plenty. Sure wouldn’t want any of my own, though.”

You can go on and on and on with these nihilists, and it won’t do a damned bit of good.

It’s just a complete waste of time to devote any intellectual or moral or spiritual energy trying to turn them around, out of the Darkness, and back into the Light.

They are completely lost to us.

And my greater point is that we are facing such a horrible catastrophe now that we need to be saving every little bit of intellectual and moral and spiritual energy we have so that it can be spent on US and on OURS.

Fuck the nihilists.

They’re lost to us.

We can’t help them anymore.

They’re in full-blown Thelma and Louise mode, pedal-to-the-metal, as they head over the edge of the cliff and into the abyss.

*PS: Getting back to the question of “withdrawing from modernity”, there was a conservative activist named Paul Weyrich, who became so despondent after Clinton was re-elected in 1996, that he essentially advocated the same strategy – withdraw, regroup, rethink, prepare for battle.

The Amish [or the Anabaptists who would become the Amish], and also the Mormons [who are a bunch of kooks, but kooks whose hearts are in the right place, God bless ‘em] realized all of this about 150 years ago, and began their withdrawal from Modernity [the Amish by embracing strategic Luddism, and the Mormons by heading out into the barren wastelands of Utah to practice polygamy].

And it’s done wonders for their fertility rates.

You see it also in “Orania” in South Africa – the Bohrs are just checking out altogether, and giving a great big middle finger to the global multicultural elites.

Finally, you see it to a certain extent, at least abstractly, in the American homeschool movement.

Anyway, I feel like that’s about where we’re at right now: Withdraw, retreat, re-think, re-arm, prepare for secession and the apocalypse.

And in the meantime: Fuck all of these nihilists who just aren’t worth wasting the calories on.

It’s my favorite too. A picture is worth a thousand words, and it puts in easily-understood pictorial form the fairly common internet cry “Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for everyone?”

Also, SE Asia should be light brown with yellow dots, the eastern and southern coasts of Africa should have yellow and brown dots, most Latin American countries should be whatever color you want Italy to be with brown, yellow and black dots. And Greenland should be either white (as in: empty) or yellow with pink dots (as in: Eskimo land that technically belongs to Denmark)

The whiter the color in the map, more white population in the region. Argentina and Uruguay are even more white, with native americans speckles in their countrysides.

We’ve been receiving peruvian, bolivian and haitian imigration actually, but we know that, in two or three generations, they’ll become “brazilians” like the rest of us. In fact, we pity them, because we know that, if we are “poor” [ = 3rd World Country fighting to improve] they’re even poorer [ = 4th World countries].

PS: nobody here use more the word “pardos”, but, for your better understanding, I translate it like “mestizos”.

Just to keep this real and all, you do know that by far the majority of slaves were rounded up by members of other tribes and sold the whites right? Of course now days it is Arabs doing a lot of the round up, but those slaves don’t go the the North American market so much.

you do know that by far the majority of slaves were rounded up by members of other tribes and sold the whites right?
——————————————————————————————
Yes. And do you know what the white man does if you don’t bring him some slaves from the other tribes?

That BBC whitey be bad and sheet “documentary” on the Congo is utter, utter crap.

Here’s what I commented on YouTube :

This is absolute bullshit.
Africa just passed the one BILLION mark on the nigometer. In 1890 there were fewer than 80 million niggers in ALL of Africa.
The white man brought not just civilization and infrastructure to the DArk Continent, he﻿ brought Life itself, and LOTS of it.

Yeah. The African Slave Trade was well in place before Europeans became involved. The Middle Eastern countries were in the slave trade before the Europeans and kept at it until 1900. Nobody really talks about that much, nope, “Whitey” is the bad guy all on his own.
Just like nobody talks about the black slave-owners that existed in the U.S. also.
It is so easy for so many people in the world to point fingers at whites like they are some homogenous group. Lots of white peoples were slaves too.

all the black people who stayed behind in Africa got mistreated too. Matter of fact, they got treated far worse.

So all the black people enslaved by whites were living better in the US/Caribbean than the black people living as citizens under black (or Muslim) kings/warlords/tribal fathers in Africa? I mean, I agree that that’s more or less true. Don’t see how that jives with your idea about whites being international criminals, tho. Did you read your comment before you posted it?

Just a bit of reality for ya there, chum: There weren’t any Zionist back then. So your fav David Duke delusional hate is nothing but another conspiracy theory added to the long list. He just feeds on ignorance. BTW, new slaves were prohibited in America since 1808.

There were many races that got involved in the African slave trade. For goodness’ sake, the African themselves sold their own brethren, and the Muslims from sub-Sahara were heavily trading in slaves.

Most slaves were brought into America on Spanish slave ships starting in the 1600s. And since jooz were killed or driven from Spain during The Inquisition, it’s highly unlikely jooz were running those Spanish slave ships. You need to remind Mr. Duke of that lill’ fact.

That said, I am sure some lone Joo found himself trading in slaves, just as there were jooz that helped the Confederacy Army against the Union.
Doesn’t mean jooz collectively were heavily trading in slaves.

Either way, what’s his point, if not to foment hate between Jooz and Blacks? Not that he needs to work hard on that endeavor. Blacks hate Jooz thanks to the efforts of Nation of Islam’s Farrakhan spewing his hateful lies.

Nothing new under the sun. A new Joo hater is born every day. Same shit, different day.

Oh, how Greg Eliot is gleefully walking on clouds at the sight of David Duke making yet another retarded claim.

“Don’t know too much about Duke since I stopped following his progress more than two decades ago, and it seems he just turned out to be another opportunist rather than any “great White hope”.

He’s been around for 20 years ++? I guess, he couldn’t find employment, eh? This is what happens when one starts obsessing over the jooz rather than looking for true solutions to our problems; he becomes a joke.

Man, you come off like an ignorant bitch. Slavery was a big business at one point in the history of the ” new world “, and as with any other business, the jooz were disproportionately involved among the top ranks of said business. The videos were posted as a counterargument to the constant blame that is heaped on the ” evil white man ” for new world slavery. Just as you mentioned yourself all the races were involved in slavery of one sort or another. Yet, your stupid ass, will eventually start going on about the injustices committed by the ” white western establishment ” against the poor native peoples of this planet, and how we shouldn’t blame the ” perfect pure ” joos for anything. As a starting point, I suggest you look at the history of the Rothschild family’s involvement in the slave trade, and the founding of Israel. By the way, is Lilith a Hebrew name ?

Ok, I see that you’re knee deep in conspiracy lore, and I am very saddened by it. You sound intelligent, but your Jew hate, resentment, and envy is rendering you irrational, so you believe every nonsense conspiracy. That’s why I even bother responding to you – because I feel sorry for you.

Here are the facts they don’t tell you in Jew conspiracy school:

1) You said: “Slavery was a big business at one point in the history of the”new world “, and as with any other business, the Jews were disproportionately involved among the top ranks of said business.”

No. Jews were not disproportionately involved in the slavery business. That’s just yet another new complaint WNs make against Jews for the sake of slandering them. Their involvement was minuscule. Your buddy David Duke tries to make it sound like some Zionist conspiracy. Zionists didn’t exist at the time. He knows that full well, but he is betting most people aren’t educated enough to know this, and he is benefitting from people’s ignorance. Well, not all of us are ignorant. Some of us know history very well, so his type of revisionist history doesn’t fly.

David Duke is basing his claims on a book called “The Secret relationship between Blacks and Jews “ written by the Nation of Islam, which was denounced as lies. It’s funny. You WNs hate blacks, yet you repeat every anti-Jewish claim made by the Nation of Islam, which wants to kill all whites as well, not just Jews. You are willing to make a deal with the devil, as long as it will help your war against the Jews. In other words, you’re willing to destroy yourself so long as you get to destroy the Jews. Sounds Hit-larain? I’ll say so.

2) You said: “The videos were posted as a counterargument to the constant blame that is heaped on the ” evil white man ” for new world slavery.”

Regarding white men and slavery, that’s just a fact. Most slave traders were white. But which white? Spanish and Portuguese. The Spanish empire was the most active in the slave trade, and not just from Africa. The Spanish even enslaved the Indians of the new world as well.
The Spanish and Portuguese imported Africans as laborers to the Americas since 1502, when the Spanish monarchs, Ferdinand and Isabella, granted permission to the colonists of the Caribbean to import African slaves. They generally bought them from Arab traders and continued to import African slaves to the West Indies and Americas, until the mid 19th century. BTW, Spain was Jew free during this period spanning 400 years, as per the Inquisition.

Great Britain was the most anti-slavery of the European nations. In fact, support for abolitionism rose first in Great Britain before it reached our shores. Slavery was also abolished under the French Revolution. Spain was the last from the European powers to abolish slavery. So, most Whites aren’t to blame for the slave trade, just the Spaniards.

As I mentioned in the previous post, Jews had a miniscule involvement in the salve trade compared to the Spanish and Portuguese. It’s yet another antiSemitic claim made by Jew haters to foment hate between blacks and Jews.

3) You said: “Just as you mentioned yourself all the races were involved in slavery of one sort or another. Yet, your stupid ass, will eventually start going on about the injustices committed by the ” white western establishment ” against the poor native peoples of this planet, and how we shouldn’t blame the ” perfect pure ” Jews for anything.

Yes, people of all races were involved in the slave trade, including Jews, but their involvement was very marginal. In addition, I don’t have any sympathy for “the poor native peoples of this planet.” Most conservatives, like myself, don’t like slavery, but we don’t think it was necessarily that bad for Africans. The Left of that time (abolitionists) tried to make it sound so cruel. Yet, most slaves were educated, baptized, and treated compassionately, in other words civilized. Ask any African decadent of slaves if they would like to go back to Africa. No one ever returned back to Africa, despite all the supposed racism in the USA. In other words, all the bad publicity over slavery and racism is nothing more than yellow journalism. Unlike you, I DO see the truth for what it is.

4) You said: “As a starting point, I suggest you look at the history of the Rothschild family’s involvement in the slave trade, and the founding of Israel.”

You know, I am really tired of all this conspiracy bullshit. Somehow, the Rothschild family is always dragged into every Jewish conspiracy. Soon the family would be blamed for UFO cover ups too.

The Rothschild family was/is a banking family. It didn’t need to trade in slaves. That’s just a fabrication. As far as Israel, I love Israel. And I am glad it’s around (Israel is responsible for many scientific developments, not to mention it’s forefront in the fight against Islam). So whoever helped fund it, more power to him/her/them. That said, the Rothschild family didn’t have much to do with the funding of Israel (as I said, the Rothschild family is always dragged into the story somehow). They mostly intermarried, and most decedents consider themselves Christians since the 19th century. Other Jewish families though in the 19th century did, with the help of many Christian Zionist. Christian Zionism was a very strong movement in England at the time among Non-Jews.

5) I am not Jewish.
Lily is a flower.
Lilith is a female vixen character form Jewish mythology. She was Adam’s first wife. She refused to submit to him and was replaced by Eve. To my knowledge, no Jews call their daughters Lilith. It’s supposed to be a bad name to give a girl.

The book attempts to explain why Eurasian civilizations (including North Africa) have survived and conquered others, while arguing against the idea that Eurasian hegemony is due to any form of Eurasian intellectual, moral or inherent genetic superiority.

Diamond argues that the gaps in power and technology between human societies originate in environmental differences, which are amplified by various positive feedback loops. When cultural or genetic differences have favored Eurasians (for example, written language or the development among Eurasians of resistance to endemic diseases), he asserts that these advantages occurred because of the influence of geography on societies and cultures, and were not inherent in the Eurasian genomes.

I think the book overstates its case and ignores the elephant in the living room; deliberately I might add. When it comes to his own people, Diamond doesn’t even believe his own BS. That’s fodder for the Goyim. Its little more than sophisticated equalist double talk.

It’s actually a pretty good book. It just doesn’t (can’t) explain everything we observe with respect to group differences, even though this is how it’s presented to us.

Nevertheless, cultural and environmental explanations are powerful in their own right. Even if they do fall quite some way short of presenting a complete picture, they are a useful reminder that what we see right here, right now is not the only thing that a group is capable of. That’s a useful reminder because there’s a faction out there who pushes a version of genetic determinism that more or less tells people, “See group X there? This is the very best they’re capable of; if they were capable of more they’d have been more by now.” That picture is false, but it’s very conducive towards inculcating hatred, which is why it’s so readily employed. Just something to be on the guard against.

Jared Diamond openly states at the beginning of the film of the same name that he dismissed racial causes for differing outcomes, not due to scientific process, but due to the fact that he was offended by the idea. He is a shit scientist.

Bullshit… in a lot of prisons, the guards are merely the lackey’s of the gangs, and are equally intimidated when they can’t be bribed.

Deciding which bribes to take, if you know what’s good for you, isn’t power… and now that more and more prison guards are darkies themselves, the bribery and corruption has become far more rampant.

Then again, Hollywood tells us that there is always, at least, one negro who is willing to be a steadfast friend and mentor to some white schuck… maybe even protect him from all those nasty white rapists.

Awww, it’s so cute when sub-humans start “blaming whitey” for interrupting their sister-fucking, cannibalism, rape, and dung-eating.To a Stepin Fetchit like thwackie, all his problems are from whitey. The glory of being randomly murdered by his fellow Trayvons has been subdued by Bushitler. Fight the power with pop music!

That’s the kind of critical thinking you get from “people” with an average IQ of a 12-year old: 12-year-old logic wrapped in pre-adolescent angst.

Next time, let’s just round these fuckers up and gas ‘em. In fact, we still can. Tell ‘em there’s a bag of weed on that train, or some malt liquor, or that Obama said so. To a darkie, that’s all the logic in the world that you need.

Good Gawd Almighty, I allowed myself to think about this seriously for just a fraction of a second – from an evo psych perspective – and the answer sent a shiver down my spine.

What if the Beta [or the “Omega” or whatever] WANTS to be cuckolded by the Alpha precisely so that, thereby, he can raise a higher quality of child, in his own name, than he would have otherwise?

The realization of it is like seeing a picture of a shriveled up old prune of a Helen Thomas, in a porn movie, being fucked in the ass, bestially, by a horse, and then trying to get the imagery out of your mind.

This will be the norm in the near future, isolated enclaves with private security, restricted general freedom of movement. Unofficial cultural segregation is already the case for SWPL in metro areas. Our hope is to get an entire state or coalition of states to adopt this ethos of internal border restriction.

The locusts will crowd and soil the metropolises and look for other civilizations to infest once depleted. Only, unlike the Goths and the high walled cities of the late Eastern Roman Empire, these feral herds will not move in the wide empty spaces efficiently — the modern barbarian cannot be organized into anything more than a flash-mob. He is terrified of open spaces, spooky nature, high mountains, and cold climes. They will huddle against each other, eat each other, and then starve.

The revolution will be manifested in separation, where those who vote for a certain political solution will be exclusively subject to its long-term consequences. Either the constitution returns to its ingenious spirit of subsidiary, or it will go in the barrel fire along with the rest of the United States of Detroit. White flight is beginning the process. The borders are where the skirmishes will take place, when the foodstamps run out.

CH re: ur tweet from the Volkh conspiracy re: family law, let me give you more news from the front lines that even you might not be aware of. I’ve posted this before.

The problem is not the statutes or the courts’ interpretation of them anymore. In Florida and nearly every other state, the divorce law statutes are facially neutral and fair to men. Men and women are equal, there is no presumption that the woman gets more time sharing (the words “custody” and “visitation” are not even used anymore—there is no “custodial” parent; there are just “parents” and a parenting plan). No presumption in favor of alimony. IN fact, hard for a woman to get awarded alimony if the marriage is less than 15 years and she’s younger than 50.

Again…the problem is the “real world/state of nature” problem that women are, indeed, helpless, no matter what feminists might contend, combined with the “problem” of when you have a good man who cares about his kids. This leads to “shadow alimony” where, quite literally, the man overpays voluntarily (using after-tax dollars, of course…it’s just financial ruin) because, to be blunt, if he does not do that the woman will not be able to pay her rent in a decent apartment where the kids live 5 nights a week.

It’s that simple.

This is the case in the vast majority of cases today (not just mine). Perhaps one out of 10 cases involves a femcutn lawyer-bitch or a woman who has inherited wealth (earned by the blood, sweat and tears of her dad, of course…think Paris Hilton) where the woman can make six figures and pay her own way in this world. And yes…there *are* cases where the woman is ordered to pay support *to the man*. It happens.

And there are plenty of judges, male and female, who seem to agree with us men here and err on the side of lambasting the woman.

The problem is the REAL WORLD/STATE OF NATURE PROBLEM when the woman is a pathetic person who can’t or won’t earn enough income to support herself. The problem is that the law allows her to get a divorce *at all* not that the court awards her alimony. The court will not award a young woman alimony after a short (say 5 to 8 years) marriage where the woman is only 34 at the time of the divorce. But the father will overpay by thousands a month anyway if doing so is necessary to keep the kids in safe neighborhood.

IGNORAMUS. First, he’s talking about child-support being paid over and beyond what is required by the court, and second, I know personally of cases where this is happening and for just the reason he gave.

Yes I am ignoramus. Which is why I aksed the question. Why the fuck would you pay extra Child support/alimony = same thing? Why? The money isn’t going to the kids. It’s going to the ex wife. Why would you do that?

The wives don’t spend all that extra money on make-up and spa treatments. They buy better homes in better (and safer) neighborhoods, and the kids get to go to better (and safer) schools. Because the money is not court-mandated, the ex-husband can put strings on it (lessons for little Jimmy), that if not followed thru on can be instantly terminated by him.

You’re a grade E / F+.
Grade A+ is the myth. Grade C is the average woman. Grade D is a woman whom has faults but doesn’t broadcast them to the world in return for the attention of Plumnuts. Grade G would be a BPD nightmare, but I don’t think you’re there just yet so I’ll go with E or F.

“By 2050 the European Caucasian Americans will be in the minority and the welfare state will be bankrupt having to spend all its money on supporting baby boomers who caused all this mess.”

The first part seems likely to happen, but I seriously doubt anybody will be in the mood to support the baby boomers – if we even had the cash for it. Honestly, I think the boomers are going to be screwed in their old age. Can’t say I feel sorry for them; they got to live in the best age in the history of the world and did nothing with their opportunities but bend over and take a big grunt on the future. I suspect the luckiest among them will end up how they treated their parents, shoving them in an old age home and getting a call from their kids once a month.

Don’t listen to these racist trolls. LOL!!!! My lovely bronzed skinned silky haired, almond eyed, sub-continental hottie, Indian females are the ultimate display of feminine beauty. My wife is Middle Eastern (I love Middle Eastern females as well) but even Middle Eastern women fall short when compared to that of the Indian female.

In Australia where I live, it is quite common to see White Australian men with Indian girlfriends/wives. So just keep on being hot girl. I think the cat is out of the bag, And the cat isn’t going back in anytime soon. :)

I disagree with you on that one Gregory. And no, I am not a troll. I read Chateau from time to time. It is a very good site with a huge amount of educational information in regards to the nature of relationships between the sexes. I read many of the comments. I find a large number of them to be informative as well.

I just happen to find brown skinned women very attractive. Indian females are particularly attractive in my opinion. I have been intimate with several over the years. Their skin is soft and smooth, their hair has a natural sheen to it, and their eyes have a unique shape to them. No trolling there. Just one guy’s honest opinion. I also find Middle Eastern/Persian females to be quite attractive as well. Followed by Southern European women, then Eastern/Central European women, then Nordic women, with far East Asian females being the least attractive in physicality in my opinion.

As for Nordic females being the gold standard in beauty………..I don’t see it. They age very badly, don’t tan well, the skin is not as smooth, and they tend to be a bit more feminist in their demeanor.

On a serious note, I do respect the right of ALL peoples to preserve their heritage and their way of life. This includes Northern European nations as well. When I referred to “racist trolls” it was made somewhat in jest. Lighten up fellas.

I understand your point, and I do myself admire the beauty of suitably endowed women regardless of race. Nevertheless, my #1 preference would be a slender, attractive British Isles girl, followed by Germanic, then Slavic.

And last I checked, the market for brown contacts was for all intents and purposes nonexistent… but green and blue, well.

Of course, now the snarkers will talk about tanning, as if that makes white people look like negroes? Nope, try again… it’s merely an amusing masquerade that makes the aforementioned white features of light eyes and hair stand out all the more.

If getting a tan made white women look like some of the coloured races, burkhas would outsell bikinis.

Based on media attention, it doesn’t seem like white women have been the gold standard for a long time. Doesn’t seem like blond women were ever the gold standard as neither Raquel Welch nor Sophia Loren were blond and they were beauties of yesteryear. Of fair women, it’s really difficult to see how nordic women were ever more attractive than slavic women.

It seems like all caucasoid groups can produce 10s though the average female attractiveness surely differs across groups. Salma Hayek is half lebanese half mexican. Monica Belluci is Italian and black haired. Aishwarya Rai is south Indian. Adriana Lima is a latina mix that includes black and native. Even Vanessa Williams looked like a 10 to me in the early 90s as her face is very caucasoid.

Personally, I’m not sure if Ive ever seen a 100% east asian or 100% sub saharan woman with a 10 face. But to me it looks like caucasoid groups can all produce beauties of the same grade A+ caliber. Across different caucasoid groups, 10s look sort of similar to each other despite the difference in skin tone. They seem to be the standard of beauty, not a particular race.

Of fair women, it’s really difficult to see how nordic women were ever more attractive than slavic women.

Again, that’s why I said Nordic/Alpine… although a recent People mag did have what one could call pure Nordic as the “world’s most beautiful woman”, if memory serves, if you want to talk more recent times… and that in a Cathedral media that does all it can to promote diverse tastes.

The leftoids (and many libertarians) make the error of presuming that border security = immigration; for the leftoids this is a feature, not a bug. The concept of border security subsumes a broader swath than mere immigration; securing the borders so we don’t have old Soviet nukes or chemical/biological weapons or god knows what getting smuggled into this country, would not even be an issue if everyone was not wrapped up in the retarded leftoid premise that border security = racism.

But at least the leftoids are not so naive that they would try to make the argument that flooding our country with millions of illiterate and indigent people is somehow going to be a boon for the economy. He can’t make money shoveling donkey shit in Mexico, but he’s going to be the next Thomas Edison once he gets past the racist American border!

Not to mention the perverse incentives created by being the biggest, most profligate welfare state in the history of the world. At least we know the European immigrants who came here a century ago were not after free shit; ask yourself (and don’t hide from the answer) what kind of immigrants we are attracting now. I’m libertarian, but my reason does not take a ciesta when discussing border security and the incentives of a welfare state democracy (remember when it used to be a republic?).

But at least the leftoids are not so naive that they would try to make the argument that flooding our country with millions of illiterate and indigent people is somehow going to be a boon for the economy.

Are you kidding? They’ve been doing so repeatedly these last few months. (And I automatically consider “leftoid” anyone who does so.)

If you wanted to send me off on a quest to try to figure out what the hell the last picture is supposed to mean, it worked. I thought it was the Royal Spanish Academy, but it apparently isn’t. I recognize those patterns and symbols from somewhere, but know not where, and can’t figure it out.

immigrant fertility drops off after the 1st generation, so those projections are simply not accurate.

HEY FAGGOT, hispanics have the highest fertility rates of any race in America. It’s that fertility differential that matters, not the rate per se.

Even if one can’t project that the differential will remain the same but neither can you offer any sort of guarantee that it won’t remain the same, mealy mouthed faggot. Caution is warranted because that that fertility rate is what actually today exists – it’s been achieved, it’s real – whereas you, mealy mouthed faggot, can only offer speculation (a nice way of saying hopeful fantasy). Faggot.

Older brother came back to Winnipeg, Canada after working in Western Australia for the summer, so had to pick him up at the airport.

Of course the bastard wants to eat, so he chooses Dairy Queen and we stop there. The place is packed, line not moving at all. Bro insists on wanting to eat there, so we wait as it crawls at a snails pace. Once we get close the front I finally notice who’s working the cash register – or the trio. Three little brown girls, clearly east Indian, are clustered around it. And not taking orders, or doing any visible work. Behind them several teenagers – almost all white, but a couple of Asians of clearly mixed heritage – were busting their asses off, flying around making ice cream treats, making food, while these three Indians are standing around talking to each other in some horrible sounding language. The one in front only takes someone else’s order when one of the Asian kids runs up and gives the last person their order – and even then, she finishes whatever she is saying to her friend first before taking another order, and takes the order rudely – and people were constantly coming back saying that their order was wrong, making the poor manager have to redo a good chunk of the transactions (I have no doubt more orders were wrong, but people didn’t want to come back up). The Indian girls looked like they could give less of a shit when the manager half heartedly berated them.

It took us about twenty-five minutes to get our ‘fast’ food, and complaining about it later at my mom’s house our Uncle, who is on the council of a smaller city in Ontario, told us how his council constantly had complaints from business owners in the community who continually had problems with 1st and 2nd generation Immigrants – laziness, thievery, and being argumentative were the biggest three, but there are apparently countless other problems. There’s even a collective in his city to stop letting immigrants from non-European, Mexican (Canada gets good Mexicans), or Japanese (very few immigrating any ways) backgrounds settle in.

One of the biggest rationalizations we hear about letting immigrants in is that they’ll ‘do’ the jobs Canadians don’t ‘want’. Maybe they’ll put on the uniform and show up at the work place, but when I walk into a business in the city and see someone standing around not doing anything when there’s clearly something to be done, almost guaranteed it’s a minority.

I imagine the situation is similar in European countries and America – if not outright worse. How do the private interests pushing for open borders not realize that immigrants are going to cheapen their wealth into oblivion?

“How do the private interests pushing for open borders not realize that immigrants are going to cheapen their wealth into oblivion?”

My guess is that

a) they are not directly affected and therefore don’t care.
and
b) they have the shortsighted view that as long as they are ok and have enough money to take care of their own then why should they care.
and
c) they are still making out of this anyway.

“Three little brown girls, clearly east Indian, are clustered around it.”
“these three Indians are standing around talking to each other in some horrible sounding language”

You sound like some sort of non Indo-European subhuman. If they are Indian, they are almost certainly Aryan (the only other possibility being Dravidian), their holiest symbol is the swastika and the language is by definition, core-est Indo-European, meaning it sounds like german or norwegian.

> “I have seen what this country/race has to offer in terms of female beauty and most of it isn’t that great.”

“Most of it”?

Nearly all of it.

Again, a White Swan/Black Swan assumption which so many people will make without ever even realizing that they’ve made the assumption in the first place: A huge percentage of all women of European extraction [to include points inland, like Ukraine and Russia] are smokin hawt, ergo ALL races MUST produce EXACTLY the same percentage of smokin hawt women.

In my humble opinion; percentage per capita of “hot” Indian women compared to white women, even allowing for white fatties, IS lower.
One of the problems is their skin colour, often, even when it is clean, it still looks “dirty” and they tend to be hairy bitches too.
Their diet of spicy food also makes their body odour smell foul.

“Ever had the feeling you’ve been cheated.” ; should be the catch cry of anyone with enough sense and intelligence from Gen X onwards (fuck the Baby Boomers) that is able to comprehend how things have gone so far to being fucked up and subverted by so few to affect so many.

I mean, so what if there’s millions of unemployed young people in the west who may not get stable jobs (let alone well paying ones) until they’re near or past 30. Or that those who are employed can only get low wage (usually temp) work with little chance of moving up the rung. Or that our future is one of ‘diversity’ strife, in a world with millions of excess people from cruel cultures squirming to move into our neighbourhood. And it’s not like we’re all massively in debt just to get a useless degree, or that our trade jobs are being given to people who’ll do it for a fraction of the person who would turn around and use their wages to buy houses, cars, start a family, pay taxes.

No, we got Xbox’s and Mac computers as kids, so clearly we’re spoiled. I mean, most of us had two parents, even if we were latchkey kids and they were never around. And even for those of us that only had one because of divorce, I mean, one is still better then none agreed?

No, the boomers, there’s a generation who knew real hardship. I mean, they had to grow up with good parents, one of which was usually at home totally controlling their shit, and like, they had several brothers and sisters they had to share their lives with. Yeah, now that they’re all grown up they’re pleasant to each other and help each other out, but back in the day they fought all – the – time. Kid in today’s school gets emotionally abused so much he comes to class one day with an Assault Rifle? What a wimp right? And when boomer’s grew up all they had to look forward to was protests born of pure privilege and destroying like, all that evil stuff like segregation and male led society – because that shit is like, evil man, and like, we can all live in peace; haven’t you ever listened to a Lennon song bro? They HAD to put off their careers, by choice, for a little while so they could save the world – today’s young people are just ‘putting’ their jobs off cause we’re lazy and shit. And like, they lived through the cold war – that one coulda killed more people then all the wars in history combined, so like, in a way they’re better then the veterans of the World Wars. I mean like, there was what, tons of nukes that coulda ended the world right? The boomers were living in a nuclear foxhole their whole lives – at least their parents only had to worry about bullets and non-nuclear bombs. The Soviet Union’s gone so all those bombs clearly went away right? There’s not like, nukes already in the hands of people who are infinitely more likely to use them then some white Europeans with a wacky ideology. I mean, North Korea, India, Israel, Iran and Pakistan will never, ever consider using their weapons against their neighbours.

Come on Mr. C, live in the real world.

“I don’t want to speak too disparagingly of my generation (actually I do, we had a chance to change the world but opted for the Home Shopping Network Instead)…”
– Stephen King, On Writing

I am a Gen X’er and was born well before 1980 …. shit, I was a teenager in the 80’s and growing up in suburban Melbourne (Australia), I assure you most of my generation was not “spoilt”.
We spent much of our early teens bored silly (this was pre internet, pre gaming, pre mobile phones etc) and without much $ to spend.

Your elected government representatives have chosen to represent the interests of lawbreakers from another country over your own. The lawbreaking aliens get a better a life (without having to fix their own country) and you get the bill for it – healthcare, education, retirement, etc. The cost of this new amnesty is estimated by the Heritage Foundation to be in the trillions of dollars.

Wouldn’t you rather spend that money on your own kids, and at least get to vote on whether you want amnesty at all.

Good for you! You no longer need to read CH’s take on things. Go directly to RSD forum and have all your desires fulfilled! A simple URL: who’d have ever thunk it!?

Go there now! Unless, of course, you think that the CH has something to offer beyond RSD forum. If, in fact, that’s the case, then why don’t you show a little respect toward CH? And if you don’t respect CH, then why the fuck are you here? Pussies.

I posted a number of the alternative logos on my Facebook page. The cartoon with the airplane about to crash into the building with the people on top holding a “welcome” sign mysteriously disappeared from my page. Facebook censorship in action.

> “So open borders is like nations butthexing themselves because they have the tingles for the darker skinned folks?”

You need to include the invasive and pervasive and ceaseless propaganda which is pushing the stupid naive impressionable malleable gullible idiot young white girls to spread their legs for the Orangutans.

And who it is who is pushing the propaganda.

Who it was who has always been pushing the propaganda.

Who it was who was pushing Paul Robison’s career in the 1930s [Laemmle et al], and Sidney Poitier’s career in the 1950s [Zanuck et al].

Who it was who was saying to a very badly mentally-ill 17-year-old-girl like Stanley Ann Dunham, “Spread your legs and let Frank Marshall Davis enter you. It’s the cool thing to do. The hip thing to do. All the best Beat Generation girls are doing it now. Don’t be a square. Don’t be so frigid. Just open up and let him in.”

Then fast forward about 50 years, and the very same crowd [Schumer, Zuckerberg, etc] are still beating the drums for white folk to bend over and take it from the Orcs.

As long as we tolerate the Frankfurt School in our midst, it will never end.

That’s cutting off your nose to spite your face. Though if that truly is the best of all possible worlds I can’t blame a white man for wanting to stick it to the white-hating nogs with the only means left to him.

Speaking of open borders, there is an article in the NY Times today about the impending BART strike. Turns out that even the liberals in San Francisco are getting tired of the unions BUT.., the ace in the hole for the union is the Latino vote. Because the union is strongly for “immigration rights” (whatever), the Latinos support the union. This also suggests that Latinos either don’t pay taxes or aren’t good at math.

So, there in a nutshell you have our future. Parasitic unions getting their way by allowing more parasites into the country. All paid for by the dwindling tax payer class. Third world, here we come. Of course, you could substitute Democrat for union and it would still be accurate.

As Father Gregorio said in Half-Life 2, “Look for your own salvation!”

Detroit is not the only bankrupt city. CH needs to do a post about the coming collapse of the dollar and local governments. No more fire and police. We will be on our own. A certain segment of “society” has been training and already knows how to use their guns.

“Think about it like this: Steve Sailer’s policy views are much closer to the typical American’s than mine. Compared to me, he’s virtually normal. But the mainstream media is very sweet to me, and treats Steve like a pariah. I have to admit, it’s bizarre.”

Bizarre? Really?
I walked into a black neighborhood and there were several people listening to rap music. That was just as bizarre.

I have to laugh at the sheer cojones this bastard has, acting as if we are somehow unable to see the elephant in the corner of the room. Only Anthony Weiner seems to have more, how do say it? – Oh yeah, chutzpah.

Anybody who has half a brain and who has been keeping up with all the gossip about Larry Sinclair and Chicago Man’s Country and Donald Young and Rahm Emanuel and Reggie Love knew that he was poof.

The icing on the cake, though, is that she is obviously a BEARD – not just metaphorically, but LITERALLY.

Meaning her masculinity [right down to the bulging musculature in her Orangutan torso] is so much more pronounced than his that you could easily envision him being without facial hair and her being the Bearded Lady at a 1930s-era carnival freak show.

If only Orangutans could organize themselves sufficiently to be able to mount a travelling carnival, that is.

But with the Orangutans, the carnival would last about a week, before the brand-spanking-new-straight-from-the-factory Ferris Wheel fell apart and the customers started plunging to their deaths…

Jesus H Christ, he really does look like the woman in the relationship, doesn’t he?

We don’t do Orangutan Behaviorology much at the Chateau, but if those were two SWPL whites, then Heartiste could write an entire 5000 word essay on the sexual role-reversal which that photograph betrayed.

Immigration Reform: code for, “Tidal wave of democrat voters to help turn the decadent USA into a third world nation.” It’s depressing, so many fools and traitors…

BTW, question for you pros about facebook/text/pm game. Situation: want to see if I can redo and win with a girl who friendzoned me two years ago for lack of game. (I was an idiot. A shred of game got me some progress, then I relapsed. Lack of game killed me) Haven’t seen her in person for two years, I messaged her twice this year. Once, testing waters and mockingly asking if she was still at the old school (we met at a junior college, I transferred out), and she was politely going “fuck you.” Second time I randomly asked, “Man, ever look back and seriously wished you had brawled with someone?” She was suddenly friendly and blabbed on for a paragraph.

So… what would a pro do? I never read much about how to translate game into messaging/fb type stuff, though sites like these teach a ton about in person game.

Then maybe one evening, she’ll see you out with some fine-assed trim on your arm, and all her feminine juices will get to simmering and boiling, and she’ll blow her top and start a hellacious catfight, over you, with the other chick, right then and there in public.

But until that point, the key is to get on with your life and to forget about her.

The crypto-gayish-castrati website known as The Good Man Project has finally come out from under their fraying, fraudulent cover.
Hugo S. put a lot of trolling bullshit into their mouths, over a period of years, and their response was highly consistent: “Thank you sir, may I have some more”. Therefore their collective ability to detect insincerity is less than zero.
There is only one explanation… Their whole enterprize is a troll-castle. None of them ever mean a single world they post. Except for the many homosexual sadists who get off mainly by seeing other men suffer.

I hope he is genuinely suffering a mental breakdown, but, considering he’s such a slimey worm, it’s likely an act designed to elicit sympathy and save his marriage, job, and position within the feminist e-community. I don’t know if this guy believes the shit he writes or if half the anecdotes he relays are true. Perhaps he is a fantasist and attention-seeker. This would actually be less sad. Otherwise he has been slowly castrating himself for the approval of these feminists, only to become the object of their scorn. And now, when he suffers most and his nutsack hangs by a solitary flap of skin, the ratchet up the insults and squeal with glee louder than ever before. He hasn’t earnt any more of their respect than those of us here who tell them to shut up, cook our meals, and suck our dicks.

Regardless of his intentions, the guy is a wanker. I’d like to throw a left hook to his liver.

. …”In his provocative book The Death of Character, author James Hunter traces out how America lost its older ideals about virtue and character.
Before the Industrial Revolution, Americans honored the virtues of “producers” – hard work, self restraint, sacrifice for the future and sacrifice for the common good. But during the twentieth century, as people became wealthier and the producer society turned gradually into the mass consumption society, an alternative vision of the self arose – a vision centered on the ideal of individual preferences and personal fulfillment. The intrinsically moral term “character” fell out of favor and was replaced with the amoral term “personality”.

Hunter points to a second cause of character’s death: inclusiveness.
The first American colonists created enclaves of ethnic, religious and moral homogeneity, but the history of America ever since has been one of increasing diversity.

In response, educators have struggled to identify the ever-shrinking set of moral ideas everyone could agree upon.
This shrinking reached its logical conclusion in the 1960s with the popular “values’ clarification” movement , which taught no morality at all.
Values clarification taught children how to find their own values, and it urged teachers to refrain from imposing values on anyone.

Although the goal of inclusiveness was laudable, it had unintended side effects.
It cut children off from the soil of tradition, history and religion that nourished older conceptions of virtue…. asking children to look only within themselves for guidance is like asking each one to invent a personal language; a pointless and isolating task if there is no community with whom to speak.

…..I quickly realized that there are two main kinds of diversity; demographic and moral. Demographic diversity is about socio-demographic categories such as race, ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, age, and handicapped status.
Calling for demographic diversity is in large measure calling for justice; for the inclusion of previously excluded groups.

Moral diversity, on the other hand, is essentially what Durkheim described as anomie; a lack of consensus on moral norms and values.

Durkheim is the Sociologist who found that freedom from social ties is correlated with suicide and gave us the word ‘anomie’ (normlessness) – the condition of a society in which there are no clear rules, norms or standards of value. In an anomic society, people can do as they please, but without any clear standards or respected social institutions to enforce those standards, leading to an increase in amoral and antisocial behavior.

Once you make this distinction, you see that nobody can coherently even want moral diversity. If you prefer diversity on an issue, the issue is not a moral issue for you; it is a matter of personal taste.

Great picture, CH. Yay, everyone wants to be your neighbor! Aren’t you special. Want a cookie?

White America could tax the .1% (look closely and you’ll see a decimal before the “1”) on capital gains to compensate for employment outsourcing, something my black ass wouldn’t even do (the tax, not the outsourcing).

OR

White America could establish draconian tariffs to protect domestic participants in various industries, something my black ass wouldn’t even do (honestly, I shouldn’t even know what “draconian” means).

However, you fight for retention of wealth yet continuously buy inexpensive goods. You are between a rock and a hard place, but you have the strength to free yourself. Are you all a bunch of motherfucking masochists?!

What did Meyer Rothschild say? “He who controls the money, makes the laws.” Oh wait, he was a [blank].

You could look Obama in his eyes, and try and swallow the fact that he received a D in Calculus during college (I got a C+ in Calc II, wasn’t a requirement though, B for Calc I). You could let him fight against those who take advantage of you. But you won’t. And I wouldn’t either.

“Do we really need these people from Asia, South America and Africa?”

I’m sure proof exists that most immigrants (with the exception of one country) come from a nation that the USA relies on for imports. What, you thought they were going to give this nation some goodies on the low, without any collateral? One of my best friends is the grandson of Chiang Kai-Shek’s right-hand man. This guy is now working for one of the Big Four (KPMG).

“Well, the Messicans…”

…are coming here because they don’t have jobs thanks to NAFTA. If anything, look no further than your local congressman, Fortune 500 COO and hedge fund manager (all probably Republican). The Democrats want the hombres and mujeres to flood this country and get them naturalized for that first Tuesday in November. I mean, c’mon, Lyndon did say, after signing the Civil Rights Act, that “we’ll have the niggers voting Democratic for 200 years.”

Your future is a isolationist-socialist* representative republic.

Norway and Sweden will, during the month of February, cause your urine to freeze before it hits the commode. You will deal with entitled bitches not unlike those in America, who are empowered due to inadequate approaches to the humanities which forces Anais Nin into their frontal lobes. They pay the same high taxes as you, but receive the same salaries for lesser work and can still get sex whenever they want, because they are women. They don’t need you (although I’m sure you’re a fucking balla, no homo). If you are provided with frequent coitus, that opportunity will only come from matrimony. You will be miserable because you pay your taxes AND her taxes. She can divorce you and take your money simply by opening her pussy wide enough for a small head to come out. You might even become a statistic and play Russian Roulette…with 6 bullets in the chamber.

However, no slant-eyes or brownies living next door. Hip, hip, hurray!

*”Isolationist” indicates nationalist status is already assumed.

“the moral and utilitarian thing to do is open the border to my rectum to any undersexed homosexuals so that Gross Domestic Penis is increased”

clever…remember, you can only diss them when they’re on the bottom!

My friend at Google and another friend at Atlantic Records graduated from an undergraduate program for a certain school our alleged foreign-born Muslim commander-in-chief has on his job resume. What did they say to each other, diplomas in hand?

In Australia we have the situation where around 20 000 people are arriving on our shores illegally by boat. Our total population is around 22 million.
Both sides of government here have been talking tough about how to handle these “boat” people which basically centres around putting them in detention centres until they are “processed” (deemed fit to stay as refugees).

The other side of the coin is Australia’s total migration program for 2013-14 which will be for around 200 000 places.
Around 140 000 places for skilled migrants including employer sponsored migrants, skilled independent migrants and business migrants. (woops, there go our jobs) and around 60 000 places for family migrants who are sponsored by family members already in Australia.

The lack of planning in how to handle this yearly influx is laughable and the lack of investment in infrastrcture is criminal.

Walk through any shopping mall in the West of Melbourne or Sydney and you will soon see who is having all the kids; the Lebanese, Indians, Asians etc.

Between 30 – 40% of Australian families pay no net tax.

The Chinese middle class (there are some 300 million of them) would LOVE to come over here and buy as much property as they can get their hands on.

Our housing prices are now amoung the least affordable in the world.

The Indian middle class aren’t far behind.

Australian manufacturing is fast going down the toilet and it is only our mining boom that has saved our bacon but it isn’t going to last forever.

If you want to understand the future of the human being, look to the hardest, most well-quantified sciences, esp. those branches that have easy transmission into technologies that improve everyday life.

Never look to literary/philosophical text or prose commentary because it always assumes, with a pessimism that has heretofore been useful, that there is “nothing new under the sun,” and, therefore, the human condition cannot be changed in kind.

This change in kind is exactly what is happening now. As computing power increases and begins to reach levels that allow us to quantify biological information — to truly understand and manipulate such information — the human being slowly but surely becomes the “God” that it has always imaginatively intuited as its ultimate destiny and realization.

The current “nihilism” and sense of decline, etc., that plague the intelligent and anxious men who gather here will be mooted by this unstoppable ferocity of scientific/computational progress.

That said, I don’t necessarily think they are worse at getting women than American men are, just because more Russian women than men marry out. The crucial factor is that Russian women are far hotter on average, and Russian men are therefore far less likely to consider American women as serious dating prospects.

Article is an excellent find. It explains why Eastern European women are renowned world-class beauties (apart from their genetic advantages). In a competitive, oversupplied market women have to play up their femininity, which is made still more necessary by the Russian culture’s default manliness. In the west, our problem is the opposite.

Which means none of this is the woman’s fault.

If men act like men, women will take their cue and become complementary. Masculinized women can more easily revert back to their natural state than can feminized men. Manliness is a product of a lifetime of training/discipline (because rash savages quickly destroy themselves, as drunken 45-year-life-expectancy Russkies are), a building-up, and gentlemanliness is the singular achievement of civilization. Whereas femininity is a passive, almost instinctive state of weakness/vulnerability, a resignation, against which any girl can simply stop fighting — assuming she overcome a lifelong ideological poisoning.

(Not unrelated, this is the reason why “men going their own way” and “male rights activists” are risible on their face. This is also why bitchy bitter betamales whining about how nasty women are today [the Mark Minter legacy] will find no audience on the left or the right. See CH’s recent misguided whinery about “how women tool men.”)

With the Duma’s recent unanimous criminalization of public faggotry, and the raw material of a manly culture (albeit swinging out of control), the backwater Russia is at least intellectually treating the most important issue of this young century with seriousness: no culture, advanced or primitive, can long endure by confusing the role of the sexes and thereby splitting apart the atom of society, the family. Many caveats, considering Russia’s legacy of a century’s godlessness, of course, but maybe Eric Snowden knows something we don’t.

The trick is to take the unabashed alpha attitude of Russia and temper it with the discipline and grace of the British/American enlightenment, which strikes the crucial balance between rashness and cowardice by its equally unabashed worship of God. The Russians have the nuclear energy of manliness exploding in a mushroom cloud, but it remains to be harnessed and directed to creative rather than destructive ends, like a power plant does.

This is why the Christian “manosphere” will lead the way. Secularists, atheists, and slothful agnostics have conventional weapons, which they eventually must turn on themselves. But men of God have nuclear fusion harnessed by discipline and focus. The secular self-centered PUA brigade simply does not have the resources for a long, twilight struggle. Their blithe, almost Russian disregard for the family, their self-sterilizing hatred of life, will render them extinct while our third generation makes it to the mountaintop.

From the book; The Happiness Hypothesis by Jonathan Haidt.
. …”In his provocative book The Death of Character, author James Hunter traces out how America lost its older ideals about virtue and character.

Before the Industrial Revolution, Americans honored the virtues of “producers” – hard work, self restraint, sacrifice for the future and sacrifice for the common good. But during the twentieth century, as people became wealthier and the producer society turned gradually into the mass consumption society, an alternative vision of the self arose – a vision centered on the ideal of individual preferences and personal fulfillment.
The intrinsically moral term “character” fell out of favor and was replaced with the amoral term “personality”.

Hunter points to a second cause of character’s death: inclusiveness.
The first American colonists created enclaves of ethnic, religious and moral homogeneity, but the history of America ever since has been one of increasing diversity.

In response, educators have struggled to identify the ever-shrinking set of moral ideas everyone could agree upon.
This shrinking reached its logical conclusion in the 1960s with the popular “values’ clarification” movement , which taught no morality at all.

Values clarification taught children how to find their own values, and it urged teachers to refrain from imposing values on anyone.

Although the goal of inclusiveness was laudable, it had unintended side effects.
It cut children off from the soil of tradition, history and religion that nourished older conceptions of virtue…. asking children to look only within themselves for guidance is like asking each one to invent a personal language; a pointless and isolating task if there is no community with whom to speak.

…..I quickly realized that there are two main kinds of diversity; demographic and moral. Demographic diversity is about socio-demographic categories such as race, ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, age, and handicapped status.

Calling for demographic diversity is in large measure calling for justice; for the inclusion of previously excluded groups.

Moral diversity, on the other hand, is essentially what Durkheim described as anomie; a lack of consensus on moral norms and values.

Durkheim is the Sociologist who found that freedom from social ties is correlated with suicide and gave us the word ‘anomie’ (normlessness) – the condition of a society in which there are no clear rules, norms or standards of value. In an anomic society, people can do as they please, but without any clear standards or respected social institutions to enforce those standards, leading to an increase in amoral and antisocial behavior.

Once you make this distinction, you see that nobody can coherently even want moral diversity. If you prefer diversity on an issue, the issue is not a moral issue for you; it is a matter of personal taste.

Saudi Arabia did not outlaw slavery until 1962, that’s not a typo, 1962. Mauritania has outlawed slavery three times. The last time was last year. There are still slaves there. The slave owners are Arab. The slaves are black.

Every year brings several cases of domestic servants being held as slaves in the homes of Arab diplomats in the US. What do you think goes on in their native countries?

Facebook is being deserted, at least in my social circle. The proles have occupied it. People who matter are all moving towards Instagram, which is protected from the mobs by it much more difficult interface

Saudi Arabia did not outlaw slavery until 1962, that’s not a typo, 1962. Mauritania has outlawed slavery three times. The last time was last year. There are still slaves there. The slave owners are Arab. The slaves are black.

This only proves how racist América and the West are. They all outlawed slavery only once while vibrant Mauritania hás done that thrice and we are still counting

Two things:
Thomas Sowell of the Hoover Institution (www.tsowell.com), writes that when people are in isolation they do not ‘progress’ as well as compared to when they mix. So, I guess American blacks should be greatful on the whole that there ancestors where brought here.

Meanwjhile, Money Magazine rates the Best Places to live in. As carried by Yahoo news, the #1 place is Sharon, Massachusetts, population 17K+.

According to the description: “Sharon’s schools are a big draw for families. So is its diversity. The town has seven synagogues, nine churches, and one of New England’s largest Islamic mosques. Nearly 30% of students in public school are nonwhite, and 18% speak a language other than English at home.”

BTW, the town is known for its high percentage of white Russsian-Jewish residents.