"The average life
expectancy of the American people, as reported just a few weeks ago, exceeds 76
years. And that is a high-class problem."William Jefferson Clinton 12/28/98

"In recent years, there has been
an explosion in the frequency with which we turn to unilateral economic
sanctions. According to one count by the National Association of Manufacturers,
the United States has imposed unilateral economic sanctions 92 times since the
end of WWII; 62 -- well more than half -- have been imposed since 1993. The
President's Export Council notes that more than 75 countries are now subject to
some form of economic sanctions." (Stuart E. Eizenstat, Under Secretary of
State for Economic, Business and Agricultural Affairs).

With these many sanctions in place,
one would believe that economic sanctions are being enforced to change foreign
policies, but Eizenstat goes on to state that, "The history of our use of
unilateral sanctions very clearly shows that in the majority of cases they fail
to change the conduct of the targeted country.... Used at the wrong time and in
the wrong ways, sanctions can actually impede the attainment of our objectives
and undermine U.S. policy objectives. " The question is raised, then why
are economic sanctions so widely used?

One outstanding example of economic
sanctions now are the sanctions imposed on Iraq. Since these sanctions began, a
million and a half Iraqi citizens have died above and beyond the normal death
rate. Recently, Iraq was bombed again with seventy hours of fire from the sky.
What grave sin has this country committed that warrants another merciless
bombing after nearly eight years of brutal economic sanctions that have reduced
25% of the country to starvation levels? Why have the economic sanctions
continued despite massive evidence that they fail in obtaining their stated
objectives?

To see this possibility we need to
step back in time and examine Iraq's economic sanctions in the light of the Gulf
War. By seeing the primary targets and admitted motives for the bombings, a
different picture begins to emerge than what the carefully censored press
reports draw. If we examine the carnage, we can see that the main targets were
civilian and civilian infrastructure and not military.

"WE LIVE WITH DEATH"

- An Iraqi woman

What was destroyed during those
nightmarish weeks? In Ramsey Clark's book Challenge to Genocide; Let Iraq
Live, he carefully details the destruction. A synopsis shows that: more than
90% of the electricity was eliminated in the first few hours. Within days
reports glowingly trumpeted, "not an electron was flowing." Nearly
half of all the phone lines were destroyed. One hundred and thirty-nine bridges
were destroyed including major highways and other roads. Not only were military
vehicles attacked, but civilian cars, trucks, buses and even taxi cabs were
shelled during the siege. Iraq's eight major multipurpose dams were repeatedly
bombed. This caused widespread flooding and wiped out clean drinking water,
irrigation supplies and hydroelectric power. Four of the seven major water
pumping stations were destroyed and thirty-one municipal water and sewage
treatment facilities were bombed. Raw sewage ran down the streets into houses,
spilling out into the Tigris River polluting water sources. Without any
telecommunications to warn them of the pollution, the Iraqi people, desperate
for water, bucketed water from the Tigris for cooking and drinking.

Twenty-eight civilian hospitals,
fifty-two community health centers, five of Iraq's military medical facilities
plus Rashid Mental Hospital, Ulwiyya Maternity Hospital and Baghdad's Saddam
Central Children's Hospital were either destroyed or bombed. During the bombing,
ceilings collapsed and shrapnel and glass were showered on patients killing or
severely wounding patients, babies and mothers. With electricity cut off,
critical life support systems were stopped assuring that many thousands more
would perish from preventable wounds or disease following the attacks.

Six hundred and seventy-six schools
were bombed, completely destroying thirty-eight schools and partially destroying
eight universities. Twenty-five mosques in Baghdad and thirty-one in the country
were bombed or damaged. The 900 year- old Church of St. Thomas over a thousand
miles from Kuwait was attacked.

Manufacturing plants, textile plants,
engineering plants, construction facilities, car assembly plants, chlorine
plants, chemical, petrochemical and phosphate plants, and a major hypodermic
syringe facility were attacked and destroyed or severely disabled. All the major
cement plants were hit. Cosmetic companies, clothing factories, razor blade
plants, industrial contracting companies, as well as other numerous production
facilities, were destroyed or extensively damaged.

Civilian airports, parked passenger
and cargo planes were destroyed along with rail stations, rail yards, bus
stations, car lots and transportation hubs. All the major highways were
indiscriminately bombed killing civilians fleeing in pickups, cars and on foot.
The most widely publicized was Highway 1, called the "highway of
death," between Kuwait City and Basra. On that highway U.S. planes disabled
the vehicles at its front and rear, then bombed and strafed the resulting
traffic jam for hours. Ramsey Clark charges that, "More than 2,000 vehicles
and tens of thousands of charred and dismembered bodies littered the sixty miles
of highway."

Another outrageous incident of
civilian destruction was the bombing of the Amariyah bomb shelter. Prior to the
February 13th bombing of the Amariyah air raid shelter, even Iraq excused the
"collateral damage," the sanitized term for murder of civilians. After
that date, it was clear to Iraq and Americans that the real intent was
destruction of the civilian population. Normal war policy called for prior
notification of an attack upon civilian facilities, but Amariyah was bombed
killing the trapped civilians as they huddled together, without notice. Dropped
from high altitude the first of two "smart" bombs went down the
ventilation shafts cutting off the air supply. The second smart bomb collapsed
the ceiling upon the sleeping victims, sealing off the 40-ton exit doors. The
internal temperature instantly rose to 500° centigrade. Water pipes burst
releasing steam at 2,000° Fahrenheit. The heat was so intense that children
were incinerated leaving their figures burned into the walls.

Knowing that half of Iraq's
agricultural production comes from irrigation, the gargantuan United Nation's
force bombed all the irrigation systems. Food production plants were bombed
including factories for baby formula, vegetable oil, sugar, frozen meat and
dates. Food storage facilities were likewise targeted and disabled or destroyed.
Grain silos, hundreds of farms and farm buildings, tractor assembly plants and
major fertilizer plants were methodically eliminated. Nearly a year and a half
later in June of 1992, during the sanctions and with Kuwait safe from attack,
the U.S. burned grain and wheat fields in northern Iraq with incendiary bombs.
With farming capabilities destroyed, crops burned and irrigation systems were
wiped out; farm herds were reduced by one-third. Poultry production was 90%
decimated.

These wholesale destructions do not
count the military targets, oil refineries, pipelines, oil production
facilities, and oil tankers that were hit. When one looks at the whole picture
as it happened in sequence, the obvious conclusion one draws is unwarranted
genocide. The military structure was destroyed for the purpose of rendering the
civilians and its infrastructure defenseless from continued bombings. U.S.
soldiers labeled the continued bombings a "turkey shoot" or
"shooting fish in a barrel."

Even the military deaths are
sickening. Thousands were murdered in cold blood as they walked unarmed towards
allied lines with their hands over their heads in a surrender position.
Thousands more were buried alive in seventy-mile long trenches under tons of
sand by bulldozers.

A Pentagon planner without remorse
states, "People say, 'You didn't recognize that it was going to have an
effect on water and sewage.' Well, what were we trying to do with the
sanctions--help out the Iraqi people?" He goes on to categorically state
the real purpose for the bombings by adding, "No. What we were doing with
the attacks on the infrastructure was to accelerate the effect of the
sanctions." (emphasis supplied). The Washington Post added in a
June 23, 1991 issue, "Military planners hoped the bombing would amplify the
economic and psychological impact of international sanctions on Iraqi society. .
. . They deliberately did great harm to Iraq's ability to support itself as an
industrial society." With a large portion of the civilian medical,
educational, religious, communication, transportation, agricultural, electrical,
water treatment and sanitation facilities destroyed or permanently disabled and
no way to rebuild due to the strangling economic sanctions, is there much doubt
as to the real target? The proof of the real targets are the dead and dying.

To add insult to death and misery,
CFR member Bill Clinton, flush from his visit to Israel, pounded the country
again, but, this time, without U.N. permission or help. With the bombing
momentarily abated, Clinton has announced that he will tighten the economic
sanctions to prevent black market sales into Iraq. The black market activity
helped to give Iraqis some sense of normalcy. This cannot be tolerated.
Americans fed partial truths support the continuing genocide by a 75% approval.
By doing so, Americans also will become the victims.

Our State, marching along the path
of peaceful conquest, has the right to replace the horrors of war by less
noticeable and more satisfactory sentences of death, necessary to maintain the
terror which tends to produce blind submission. Just but merciless severity is
the greatest factor of strength in the State: not only for the sake of gain
but also in the name of duty, for the sake of victory, we must keep to the
programme of violence and make-believe. The doctrine of squaring accounts is
precisely as strong as the means of which it makes use. Therefore it is not so
much by the means themselves as by the doctrine of severity that we shall
triumph and bring all governments into subjection to our super-government.

The rationale for the war was the
"squaring of accounts" by a "peaceful conquest" when the
U.N. had to step in and end the invasion of Kuwait. Since the U.S. wants to hide
under a benevolent facade, the horrendous bombing ended, but the sanctions now
have "accelerated effects." Thus the agenda of "less noticeable
and more satisfactory sentences of death" has been carried out in Iraq by
starvation from the sanctions and a destroyed civilian infrastructure.

The sanctions provide another added
benefit to the stock market which is realized from the bombing of the civilian
infrastructure. Since Iraq cannot support itself any longer, they are forced to
buy what they need from western companies. The oil for food program has greatly
enriched those who have profited from this exchange. None of these motivations
will ever be allowed in the national media since it is controlled largely by
U.S. money interests. What the people will hear from the national media are
things like, "weapons of mass destruction," and "that dictator
Saddam Hussein." What America fails to recognize is that this beast, sooner
or later, will be coming home.

NAZI GERMANY REINSTATED

A very strong correlation between
Nazi Germany and today's brave new world of death by "more
satisfactory" means can be shown. The propaganda that Hitler published for
Russia portrayed children as a hindrance to economic prosperity and a danger to
women's health. On April 27, 1942 Professor Wetzel issued a memorandum from
Berlin stating:

Every propaganda means, especially
the press, radio, and movies, as well as pamphlets, booklets, and lectures,
must be used to instill in the Russian population the idea that it is harmful
to have several children. We must emphasize the expenses that children cause,
the good things that people could have had with the money spent on them. We
could also hint at the dangerous effect of childbearing on a woman's
health.(2)

Hitler further advocated a
"bloodless" "humanitarian" way of killing in 1932 in order
to obtain greater control of Europe for agricultural gain. In a secret party
meeting of 1932 the agricultural experts warned Hitler that the region's
"tremendous biological fertility" must be countered by a planned
"systematic" depopulation policy. A German defector named Hermann
Rauschning revealed a 1934 conversation he had with Hitler where the population
problem was discussed about the Slavs. He recalls the chilling solution Hitler
emphatically provided.

We are obliged to depopulate. . . .
We shall have to develop a technique of depopulation. . . . There are many
ways... of causing undesirable races to die out.

The French complained after the war
that there were twenty million Germans too many. We accept the criticism. We
favor the planned control of population movements. But our friends will have
to excuse us if we subtract the twenty millions elsewhere. . . . By doing this
gradually and without bloodshed, we demonstrate our humanity. (emphasis
supplied)(3)

Can we expect William Clinton to tell
the truth when he states, "we are going to face early next year a great
challenge of fashioning a bipartisan solution to save Social Security for the
21st century. I tell everybody it is a formidable problem, but it will only get
worse if we delay it. And it is a high-class problem -- we have this problem
because we're living longer. The average life expectancy of the American people,
as reported just a few weeks ago, exceeds 76 years. And that is a high-class
problem.

"When Social Security was
established and there was no early retirement at 62, and you couldn't draw until
'65, the average male life expectancy in America was 56 -- in the 1930's. So
we've gone from 56 to over 76 and, of course, for women it's a couple of years
higher." Clinton goes on to say, "And as Pauline says, women are
especially dependent on Social Security for reasons that I think would be
obvious to anyone and, therefore, have a particularly large stake in our
resolving this problem in a prompt and appropriate way." If we examine the
implication behind these words, we can see that when Social Security was
originally instituted it was expected that the average male would die nine years
before he was eligible for benefits. Therefore, some of the solutions may entail
raising the benefit retirement date, lowering the average death rate or reducing
the population of those who may need it so the funds can be secure for the
victors.

With the Iraqi example before us, the
"humanitarian" Clinton has, by the latest bombings, shown the world
what that resolution may be. With U.S. paid-for policies sanctioned by the
"peace-keeping" U.N., it is not a great shock to discover population
control measures hidden under economic sanctions with no reprisal from the
international community. By coming up with new terms for morally illegal
activities in our newspeak dictionary that is constantly being rewritten as it
was in George Orwell's 1984, we have just sanitized murder into an
accepted solution. Deception in America has become the norm. Liars are trusted
to run government. Murderers provide "health clinics." Thieves operate
banks. The media prints daily propaganda. War is called peace-keeping. Genocide
for economic gain is hidden under economic sanctions.

U.S. POPULATION CONTROL

Dr. John Coleman may have hit the
nail on the head when he stated unequivocally that "the Committee of 300
long ago decreed that there shall be a smaller--much smaller--and better world,
that is, their idea of what constitutes a better world. The myriads of useless
eaters consuming scarce natural resources were to be culled. Industrial progress
supports population growth. Therefore the command to multiply and subdue the
earth found in Genesis had to be subverted. This called for an attack upon
Christianity; the slow but sure disintegration of industrial nation states; the
destruction of hundreds of millions of people, referred to by the Committee of
300 as 'surplus population,' and the removal of any leader who dared to stand in
the way of the Committee's global planning to reach the foregoing
objectives."(4) The economic gains realized from suppression and force are
enhanced by the removal of the "surplus population" that would remain
to consume the spoils. Some Americans may not feel especially sympathetic when
it is some other race of men who are being controlled, but it behooves us to
look and see that this monster is everyone's nemesis.

A tape made available over the past
decade is entitled, "New Order of Barbarians." The tape states,
"This interview by Randy Engel, Director of the U.S. Coalition for Life
with Dr. Larry Dunegan was taped on Oct., 10, 1991 in Pittsburgh, Penn."
Dr. Larry Dunegan had produced two tapes in 1988 which this interview was built
upon. "Dr. Dunegan, spoke about his recollections of the lecture he
attended in 1969 where Dr. Richard Day, an insider, revealed the plans for their
World System, aka the totalitarian, socialist World Government. Dr. Day was the
Chairman of the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Pittsburgh from
about 1959 thru '64, about that period of time, and then he left the University
of Pittsburgh and went to fill the position of Medical Director of Planned
Parenthood Federation of America."

Dr. Day is quoted as saying, "We
can cure almost every cancer right now. Information is on file in the
Rockefeller Institute, if it's ever decided that it should be released. But
consider - if people stop dying of cancer, how rapidly we would become
overpopulated. You may as well die of cancer as something else." Dr.
Dunegan comments, "efforts at cancer treatment would be geared more toward
comfort than toward cure. There was some statement [by Dr. Day that] ultimately
the cancer cures which were being hidden in the Rockefeller Institute would come
to light because independent researchers might bring them out, despite these
efforts to suppress them. But at least for the time being, letting people die of
cancer was a good thing to do because it would slow down the problem of
overpopulation."

Dr. Day is quoted as saying,
"There is now a way to simulate a real heart attack. It can be used as a
means of assassination. Only a very skilled pathologist who knew exactly what to
look for at an autopsy, could distinguish this from the real thing."

It is widely acknowledged by most
physicians that chemotherapy and radiation do not cure cancer. Most cancer
treatment is, indeed, simply to make the victims comfortable until they die. One
of The WINDS staff recently had such an experience. A family member was dying of
cancer, undergoing all of the accepted treatments for it. When the doctor in
charge was confronted concerning this kind of treatment, the doctor stated
plainly, "our goal is not to cure the patient but to make him as
comfortable as we can." The doctor then gave the precise prognosis as to
when the patient would die. He was correct in his estimation. According to Dr.
Dunegan, Dr. Day stated that this was purposed as a means of population control.
Dr. Larry Dunegan stated that he felt AIDS was a manufactured disease based on
the statements made by the insider Dr. Day. We can only guess at the many
devious ways this mindset can use to slow population growth. One may feel that
this kind of population control is necessary until that one becomes the target
himself.

Just before the Israelites left Egypt
at God's command under the leadership of Moses, Pharaoh called for population
control by consigning all baby boys to be thrown into the Nile. Shortly after
Jesus was born, Herod instituted another population control measure by killing
all the baby boys two years old and under. We can hear in today's population
control measures and economic sanctions the same voice. Has the world
degenerated into a common band under one leader with one agenda - the
destruction of the human race? These genocidal acts are a source of grief to
Christians who value life, but they also support their faith in a soon
deliverance of the coming King.

"And I heard another voice
from heaven saying, Come out of her, O my people, so that you may not become
partakers of her sins and lest you be smitten by her plagues... [For] in her
was found the blood of prophets and of saints and of all who were slain upon
the earth." Revelation 18:4, 24.

In terms of the way the governments
are lying to us and telling us that there is a population problem, it has been
recently calculated that you could put every person on earth in the state of
Texas and have 2-1/2 acres for every person.

Are "178 billion people average" possible? Well, if you were
granting each person - man, woman and child - 25 square meters living space, 25
sq.m. working space and 25 sq.m. recreational space (that's 75 sq.m. per
person), and if you were constructing a building according to these
specifications so as to accommodate the 6 billion people who live on this planet
currently, it would cover 450 thousand square kilometers. That's about the size
of Spain. All the 6 billion people currently on this planet could live in Spain
on one floor. If you built the building in the style of a condominium three
floors high, it would cover 150 thousand sq.km, the area of England (without
Scotland and Wales). If you built it nine floors high, it would cover a mere 50
thousand sq.km, the size of Holland, Denmark or Switzerland.

So all the people currently living on this planet could be accommodated in an
area the size of Switzerland and have the rest of the planet for agricultural
purposes and as a nature resort. Of course this would demand advanced solutions
regarding energy supply and transport, solutions not based on carbon-based fuel
or atomic fission, but that shouldn't worry anyone. Since Nicola Tesla the
necessary inventions have been made; all one would have to do is take them out
of the security lockers of oil and electricity magnates and actually use them.
And food certainly wouldn't be a problem either, if one reformed today's
wasteful feeding habits (with agriculture already efficient enough to throw part
of the harvest away so as to keep the prices up).