What you’re doing – First editing your Google Places page to make sure all the info is accurate, and then claiming your page so any edits you made actually stick. This is also when you should try to remove any duplicate Places listings for your business, and it’s when you should do any basic optimization, like picking your business categories.

Explanation of timing – It usually takes 7-12 days for Google to send you the postcard with the PIN that allows you to claim your Places page. Sometimes there are hang-ups, so it’s best to get started on this ASAP.

Tuning up website

What you’re doing – Making your site at least somewhat local-search-friendly. Optimize your title tag (with a light touch on the keywords), add a footer with your business name / address / phone number to each page of your site, and make sure your homepage (or whatever you use as your Google Places landing page) contains detail on the specific services you’re trying to get visible for. Also, make sure your site isn’t “over-optimized.”

Explanation of timing – What’s on your site has a huge influence on how you’ll rank in Google Places, especially in the ever-more-common “blended” local rankings. Therefore, if there’s even a chance you’re in trouble for keyword-spamminess, bad links, etc., you’ll want to start crawling out of the doghouse ASAP. Later on (like in weeks 5 & 9) is a good time to do some general housekeeping (like scanning for and fixing dead links), to see how you can beef up your pages with more service-relevant content, to put out a couple of blog posts, or maybe to do some link-building.

Submitting to data-providers

What you’re doing – Listing your business on ExpressUpdateUSA and LocalEze, or – if you’re already listed there – making sure you’ve claimed those two listings. If possible, also claim your listing at MyBusinessListingManager and make sure it’s accurate. If you’ve got a few extra bucks, consider listing yourself on UBL.org.

Explanation of timing – It generally takes about 2 months for these data-providers to feed your business info to Google Places and to third-party sites (CitySearch, SuperPages, etc.). Because your rankings really depend on how consistent your business info is from site to site, it’s important to deal with these sites at the very beginning.

Gathering citations

What you’re doing – Getting listed on as may directory sites as you can. Start with the most important sites (like all the ones you see when you do a GetListed.org scan) and eventually try to get on some of the sites nobody’s heard of (like some of the sites on my Definitive Citations List). If possible, also try to list your business on (1) “hyperlocal” sites that are specific to your city/town and on (2) directory sites that are focused on your industry (i.e., your “vertical”). You can find these citation sources with the help of the Local Citation Finder, or by doing it the old-fashioned way.

Explanation of timing – You’ll be dealing with dozens of sites. Not only does it take time on your part to list yourself on them, but it also often takes weeks for these sites to list your business or process any edits you’ve made. You’ve got to start early. Plus, the more citations you can rack up over time, the better.

Fixing 3rd-party data

What you’re doing – Checking the data-providers (see yellow) and at least some of your citation sources (see green) to make sure all your business info is 100% accurate – and fixing any inaccurate info you find. You should also check to make sure no duplicate Google Places listings have popped up – and remove any that have.

Explanation of timing – Making sure your citations don’t get FUBAR is an ongoing task, but there’s no need to check on them every day, because many of them take a while to update. Just check on them every few weeks (at least during the 12 weeks).

Explanation of timing – If you haven’t claimed your Places page, or if your business has a bunch of duplicate Places pages floating around, it’s possible Google will erase your reviews. It’s best to hold off on requesting reviews until the Places pages aren’t being created, claimed, deleted, and otherwise jockeyed around. Plus, you’ll have your hands full anyway during the first couple of weeks.

Getting 3rd-party reviews

What you’re doing – Asking customers to write reviews on non­-Google sites. CitySearch, InsiderPages, JudysBook, etc. (and Yelp, but Yelp has rules against requesting reviews). I’ve found that having reviews on a variety of sites helps your Places rankings, and of course it’s a great way to attract the users of those sites.

Explanation of timing – You can start asking for 3rd-party reviews even while your Places page is up in the air. But I suggest focusing on the other steps first – namely, having accurate and plentiful citations, a tuned-up website, and no duplicate Places pages. On the other hand, getting 3rd-party reviews is another ongoing task, which means it’s worth starting fairly early…hence why I say start around week 3.

You might be wondering a few things…

What if you’ve been wrangling with Google Places and local search in general for a while? I suggest you still follow the timeline. If one of the steps no longer applies to you – for example, if you’ve already submitted your info for the data-providers – then cross that one off and focus on the others.

What if you already have a bunch of citations or reviews? Keep racking ‘em up. Sure, don’t pour as much time into them as you would if you were starting at Square One. But don’t stop at “good enough” – especially if you’re in a competitive market.

What should you do after the 12 weeks? Given that you’ll likely be much more visible to local customers, it’ll largely be a matter of maintaining your visibility by continuing to work on all the steps (except red and yellow), but at a significantly slower pace. (For more, see my post on how to maintain your Places rankings.)

This is one awesome article Phil! My only critique would be that you superimpose your face over Arnold’s. That would make for one awesome photo! On a side note: That’s what I envision you look like when you’re providing me your signature “done for you service”. You’re the man! But…can you make my phone STOP ringing now? I can’t keep up!

Good question. Whether you even *can* rank in towns outside yours just depends on a LOT of factors: how far away you are, how many local competitors you’re up against, which search terms you type in, which “Search near” location you’re using, how much organic juice your site has…and so on and so forth.

I say you should still follow the same sequence. If it’s even possible for you to get visible in those farther-away towns (which, again, depends largely on the above), you may just have to push harder to get more citations, more reviews, more great content on your site (preferably stuff that wins you some good links), etc. It may take longer. But the basic steps and sequence would largely be the same.

“Spot On”, as my British friends would say. In addition I might mention the power of YouTube videos (properly done of course), social media initiatives, blogging, etc. It’ is a HUGE sphere that most small biz cannot embrace, while doing their jobs.

Capital suggestion, Jim, old boy! I haven’t found that videos, blogging, and social media have much direct effect on local rankings, but they certainly can help in indirect ways. I definitely agree, though – so much so that I’d suggest those things to anyone, “local” business owner or not.

In my experience, a few YouTube videos have significant and nearly immediate lifting effect on any biz, local or otherwise, provided they are geo-coded. And now with Google+ snippets integrated into search results, the social media impact on local search results will only increase.

Yeah, it’ll be interesting to see how the Google+ snippets dovetail into local. Regarding Youtube videos, I’d be interested in seeing any “before and after” cases where you’ve more or less isolated the videos as the cause of a rankings bump. Intuitively I agree that they can only help, and I know it can be tough to “test” in GP…

I think this is great. I personally think the citations should be over a longer period of time, there are so many to get it could take up to a year to get good ranking on all the factors of citations depending on the amount of keywords, keyword density, competition and towns! As far as Video SEO. I have been pushing SEO NJ in you tune for about 6 months. I am ranked #1 or #2 for that term. It works, but you have to be consistent once a week.

I totally agree that it’s smart to pursue citations long-term; in fact, I allude to that in the last paragraph. However, I just haven’t found that you need to spend *that* long working on citations. Sure, more is always better. And of course if you have an absolute data-consistency nightmare, it may take more than 12 weeks to get the main data-aggregators and citation sites to list your correct info – and to keep them that way. But I’ve just found that there’s a point of diminishing return with citations.

Interesting about the videos. Those certainly are great if you can pull them off – especially if you’re in an industry where the 7-pack isn’t always triggered for your desired search terms.

Hi Phil,
Darren Shaw pointed out this post to me. It’s terrific. How about doing an update to take + into account? I’ve been looking for a resource to share from anyone in Local who has documented how they research a new client’s existent presence, look for problems, get them going with places/+, in this new + era. Just a suggestion!

Good call on the updated version for Google+Local. I will definitely do a 2.0 of this post (not to mention of the “how to pimp your Google page” post). Just waiting for the other shoe to fall – for Google to complete the transition to Google+.

One thing I use to sniff out potential problems / challenges with clients is a short questionnaire. I send this to a potential client to determine whether, based on his/her responses, we even should work together.

You know all the potential hang-ups as well as anyone, so you could imagine how I might ask further questions or just decide to hold off if a potential client fills out the questionnaire with answers like “my business name is Chicago Locksmith – Locksmiths – 24 Hour Lock smith” or “here are the 3 phone numbers I’ve been using…”

For me, this does a pretty good job of alerting me to potential issues right off the bat, and it always gives me enough facts to spend a few minutes scouting out the lay of the land to see if we can/should work together. Obviously it’s not some step-by-step troubleshooter itself, though (maybe that’s something I should work on.)

I know other local-searchers have questionnaires, and no doubt you have one that works every bit as well. Mine’s a work-in-progress!

While there is much I agree with, I am not convinced with the order of things.

I could be wrong, but I have (and many before me) preached about sorting out citations first. Whether it be before activating your listing for the first time, or making any substantial edits.

It has always been my understanding that, for example, when you activate your listing, Goog goes looking for supporting data. Should Goog not find said data, you stand to stunt your rankings. If Goog goes out and finds that you are a nobody; that you have nothing to back up your claim to fame (or rank) should they rank you well? However, should they go out and find all kinds of votes of confidence, including reviews, well I’d say Goog is going to look much more fondly upon you.

I certainly won’t argue that you need to get that Google Local listing updated quickly…especially given that Goog takes a weeks to publish your changes. Whether or not the changes affect your rankings pre or only post publish is a whole other article.

Not to say your order is wrong, but if it were me, I would get as much bloody supporting data live/correct first, including reviews before poking the bear.

I can see what you mean. To a large extent, the timeline is just what’s worked well for my clients and me so far. There certainly are other ways to go about it.

I think your approach would be one possible way to start a local SEO campaign in any situation, but I’m guessing it would be most applicable to a brand-new business – one that’s never had a Google listing and that doesn’t have any third-party data floating around (yet). Businesses that have had some online presence – however unnoticeable – for more than a couple months tend to have some citations and third-party data that Google could look at.

I’d be really interested in hearing more about the idea that you should get reviews before “poking the bear.” Do you mean Google+Local reviews, reviews on third-party sites, or both?

I swear by it for new listings. How much more effective it is for existing, verified ones…hard to say.

I meant third party reviews. When Google goes crawling for supporting data I want it to assign me as much clout as possible. It has been my experience that a local biz with reviews on it is better than one without during this process.

I hadn’t thought much about Google reviews on say a un-verified listing…stack em up before verification…might be something there. Not sure.

Keep in mind, I haven’t really done any conclusive testing on any of this. Purely based on experience, but have also heard similar findings from my peers.

I do generally find that older listings are a little easier to get good results for – and I think part of that is because (as you said) Google can draw on bits of info about that business floating around the local-search ecosystem.

Anyone in particular who’s suggested the approach you mention (i.e. “peers”)? I’d be really interested in taking a look at any posts that describe it (to the extent there are any).

Yes, older listings certainly are easier. I tend to compare older listings to aged domains. You’ll find it rings true on many levels.

I don’t know of any posts in particular, nor can I remember whom I have heard it from. Though, I think if you ask around you will find most would agree or at least agree that it makes sense. I’d be interested in getting Nyago and the Professors thoughts on it come to think of it.

Yeah, it would definitely be interesting to know others’ “action plans.” I believe Nyagoslav’s is similar to this one (see top comment on this post), but I’d also be interested in knowing The Professor’s take.

Late to this post, but you got mentioned a few days ago in a David Mihm piece over at Mike’s blog.
I wouldn’t quarrel with anything on your list. I would add:
1. Contemplate a change in name or address prior to all of this. Keywords in name. City center or city you care about for address. Move now if it makes sense.
2. Do a search on current name, phone and address to see if there are problems, and fix those first
3. Build up the website during that 12 weeks. You should do that anyway, but the better the website, the better the Google Places result.

Great additions! As you say, the site definitely should be built up and beefed up constantly – not only during the 12 weeks. And a business owner should never, ever, ever stop drumming up reviews. I consider this action plan a baseline: the bare minimum someone has to do to be confident he/she is making progress.

Thanks for the feedback, Carey. It’s pretty much the same process in Canada as it is here in the US. The citations up there are a little more straightforward and fewer overall, so although it’s still worth starting to hammer them out ASAP, it may not take you as many months to get listed (correctly) on all the important ones. I’d definitely get YellowPages.ca squared away as early as possible. I suggest referring Nyagoslav’s great list of Canadian citations throughout.

Yep, it still works great; I imagine your process still works well, too.

None of the fundamentals has changed in the last year; the only changes have been in Google’s branding. Obviously, the rollout of Google+ is still not finished. Once the other shoe finally falls and all businesses have the same fully functional Google+ pages, I’ll do a 2.0 version of this post. Even then, the basic timeline will be pretty much the same.

Trackbacks

[…] 12-Week Action Plan for Google Places Visibility | LocalVisibilitySystem.com – Unless you’re Arnold, furious bursts of action alone probably won’t get you very far. You need a planfor the action.This is especially important if you’re trying to get your business visible in local search – and particularly important if you want to boost your visibility in the ever-finicky Google Places results. […]

[…] a nice colourful visual. On that note, I'd recommend this excellent post by Phil Rozek as well: 12-Week Action Plan for Google Places Visibility | LocalVisibilitySystem.com I actually showed my yoga teacher this (I'm helping her with her local seo) and she loved […]

[…] year were Nyagoslav’s “Google+ Local vs. Map Maker. Is Your Business Eligible?” and this total gem from Phil, which should give every small business (and small agency serving small businesses) exactly the […]

[…] to small business owners, and yet also suitable for the advanced. I've recalled before how I've printed out and showed this post of Phil's to a couple of clients, to help them understand local search. It's instantly been able to represent […]

[…] a bigger board".! This is a good one for sticking on the wall as well (also from Phil). 12-Week Action Plan for Google Places Visibility | LocalVisibilitySystem.com Erm, the schedule (not Arnie) although you can put him on the wall if you like for some […]

[…] But I suggest you work on your local visibility even more slowly than you’re inclined to. If at all possible, you should consider intentionally take a long time (say, 6-12 months) to work your plan. […]

[…] Re: Question about google places and google + @sharack I'd definitely fix the third-party listings ASAP. It's fine to do that at roughly the same time you update Google Places, but any changes you make to the latter are more likely to stick if you've got your third-party listings looking the way you'd like them to. FWIW, last year I did a post that shows one possible timeline / sequence for doing all this stuff: 12-Week Action Plan for Google Places Visibility | LocalVisibilitySystem.com […]

[…] Reviews are crucial, but other factors matter quite a bit. It’s not enough to have a “filled out” site. You also need to put a lot of elbow grease into citations, for one thing. Although sometimes local rankings are a game of inches, more often they depend on how well you apply the fundamentals. […]

[…] I'm guessing that this is the post of mine that Linda was referring to: 12-Week Action Plan for Google Places Visibility | LocalVisibilitySystem.com Probably once Google finally completes the transition to Google+ for all business listings, I'll […]