Interesting that you call yourself a "constitutional conservative" yet you apparently support an unfounded emergency declaration by the President that essentially usurps the Article I authority of Congress to appropriate funds. Some others in the GOP caucus were far more consistent on this issue than you. While in agreement with the President's proposal to spend funds on the building of the wall, they also understood that it was constitutionally unsound to allow the President for the very first time to by-pass the Article I appropriation authority of Congress. They understood that to allow this would set an unwise precedent for future Presidents, whether Democrat or Republican. I suggest you remove the moniker that opens your radio show referring to "constitutional conservatism." You are a constitutional conservative of convenience as I suspect you are also a strict constructionist of convenience and a judicial restraint advocate of convenience.