According to a story in The Independent, an online "ghost" site of a former print newspaper, the Left-wing is now trying to destroy Breitbart's ad revenue:

"Another 100 companies have reportedly pulled their advertising from the far-right news site Breitbart, as the momentum builds behind a grassroots campaign calling on advertisers to boycott the site. Audi, Visa, T Mobile and Lufthansa have joined the growing list of companies to withdraw, according to Sleeping Giants, the group behind the campaign, which claims that at least 1,250 advertisers no longer wish to be associated with it. Campaigners have successfully encouraged Twitter users to name and shame companies who advertise on the site by posting screenshots of Breitbart ads."

This is simply economic terrorism by the Left, on a par with doxxing individuals, but on a much bigger scale. The Left is totalitarian in nature and attempts to destroy anything that does not share its premises, which is also why ultimately the Left itself has to be destroyed.

Draining the swamp—now one of Trump's signature policies—was actually a last minute idea by the campaign that was intended to harvest a few remaining votes. It was never meant to be one of the central planks of the Trump presidency.

In fact, the lobbying ban that grew out of it initially caused the transition team a real headache with regard to staffing, as most competent professionals able to perform governmental functions have lobbied at some point or other. The headache was so severe that at one point Trump told Newt Gingrich he was thinking of discarding the concept altogether.

Christopher Nolan's "The Dark Knight," the acclaimed middle chapter of his Batman trilogy, asked its viewers to consider whether it might sometimes be permissible to promulgate blatant, factual untruth as a means toward achieving a righteous end.

That film sicced Heath Ledger's harrowing Joker on audiences, portraying the perpetually grinning clown-villain not merely as a venal and murderous criminal (a la Jack Nicholson in Tim Burton's 1989 "Batman"), but rather as a kind of festering human plague with no discernible agenda except to foment general chaos and expose the mass of humanity as essentially loathsome, their proclaimed morality and ethics a mere hypocritical veneer beneath which lurks nothing but a repulsively bestial core.

In his latest "Nameless" podcast, Andy Nowicki exposes the smorgasbord of intellectual dishonesty surrounding the coverage of Milo's dodgy comments pertaining to pederasty. He also examines the various ways in which the Cult-Marx Establishment in fact promotes sexual deviancy, and the "slippery slope" down which we are now tumbling with regard to pedophilia-apologists, in the cultural context of #Pizzagate.

A Review of Alexander Reid-Ross’s “Against the Fascist Creep”

For decades, a minor cottage industry of professional “anti-racists” and “anti-fascists” has existed for the purpose of perpetually sounding the alarm about the imminent threat posed by supposed “far right extremists.” The most well-known and influential of these is the Southern Poverty Law Center, which has raked in millions of dollars largely by frightening elderly liberals and Jews old enough to remember the Holocaust with hobgoblin tales about the supposedly persistent rise of neo-Nazism in America.

The big news, not just in the Dissident Right but everywhere (including Mongolia), is the Milo Yiannopoulos Paedophilia Scandal.

This is yet another example of the "tyranny of words," where a public figure is expected to have a flawless record of statements that all line up with a consistent moral position, even when many of those statements are made in fast-flowing conversations, reacting instantly to other people, with shifting perspectives and changing levels of irony. As Cardinal Richelieu once said, "If one would give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest man, I would find something in them to have him hanged." Nowadays when "they" want to gun for you, they have your whole online history to construct their nooses from.

The Semantics of Dyed Blue Hair in the Modern West

"For who can denie but it repugneth to nature, that the blind shal be appointed to leade and conduct such as do see? That the weake, the sicke, and impotent persones shall norishe and kepe the hole and strong, and finallie, that the foolishe, madde and phrenetike shal gouerne the discrete, and giue counsel to such as be sober of mind?" John Knox

I could not resist re-purposing the title of John Knox's 16th-century diatribe against female rulers for another contemporary issue, but actually there have already been quite a few toots on the horn against the legions of blue-haired harpies that seem to be a fixture on the SJW Left. In 2015, a rather good article at Breitbart came up with the word "aposematism" to explain the phenomenon:

As I have been traveling, it has been 20 days since Robert Stark and Pilleater interviewed me. But, as Trump still refuses to touch culture, the issues herein remain fresh. My Grab 'Em by the Pussy song, race, and the Alt-Right Ethno-Nationalist state are among the other issues discussed.

Please click HERE to listen to the interview and please do comment below.

What we are witnessing in the ever more aggressive leftist efforts to suppress their political opponents is in many ways fairly familiar. When the status of an existing power structure is threatened, it fights back; and when true believers' ideals are challenged, they lash out.

However I also think there is another element at work here, and here I'm thinking primarily of the lower-order types of Leftists (like the antifa), which is that this has the feel of a kind of Ortegan revolt of the masses. I am not usually in the habit of seeking the aid of past thinkers' insights to form my own ideas—I already know what I think, so why waste my time with them? Here though, I’ll make an exception.

One hundred years ago, progressives referred to people of color as 'backward races,' 'degenerate and unprogressive,' 'non-adults. Today's leftists, of course, believe no such thing. They think all humans are equal, as they tell us at every available opportunity.

Don't they?

Careful: TWCS is noticing a sea change.

The rhetoric and the actions emanating from the left as of late show that they have perhaps taken a U-turn—a salutary one. People of Color, they are now saying, in fact have little agency, are prisoners of their instincts, and thus can't be held to the same standards as other ethnies.

While anti-Semitism makes no sense because it scapegoats one group for the failure of the much larger phenomenon of Western Individualism, it is easy to see how it came about in modern times because of the unfortunate affinity of a large percentage of Jews for egalitarian ideologies which also reveals the eternal tragedy of the Jewish people in Europe and Eurasia:

In 2015, just as the refugee crisis was ramping up, a report on the BBC carried the horrifying news that the German birth rate had fallen below that of Japan. The Japanese birth rate is notoriously low but at least Japan still has a policy of not accepting massive amounts of refugees and other immigrants. The report said that the German birthrate had fallen to a mere 8.2 children per 1,000 people per year over the last five years. Presumably a large part of that was generated by the non-White immigrants already there.

I couldn’t possibly add anything to Colin’s excellent summation of the Allied atrocity of the firebombing of Dresden, Germany at the tail end of World War II. This premeditatedly murderous attack on innocent and helpless
men, women, and children—overwhelmingly civilians who had nothing to do with
the German armament effort—was certainly one of the most grievous war crimes
ever committed in human history. We hear little about it today, because history
is recorded by the victors, and it was the Allies, the eventual winners of the world’s
most recent global conflagration—in the specific form of Great Britain’s Royal
Air Force—who were responsible for raining down an unrelenting barrage of incendiaries upon a populous city center in eastern Germany on February 13 and 14,
1945, incinerating tens of thousands and maiming thousands more in a planned terror campaign of untrammeled brutality.

It is almost impossible to have a career in mainstream politics if one has the merest hint of involvement with far-right politics. Sadly the same cannot be said for those with a history of far-left politics, even when the involvement is substantial and relatively continuous. This is why Europeans now have to be subjected to the vile comments of Federica Mogherini, the current High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, basically the EU’s foreign minister.

John Connally, President Nixon’s Secretary of the Treasury, once remarked, to the consternation of Europe’s financial elites over America’s inflationary monetary policy, that the dollar “is our currency, but your problem.” Times have certainly changed and it now appears that the dollar has become an American problem.

In a recent pre-inauguration interview with the Wall Street Journal, Trump said that the greenback’s strength – up some 25% against a broad basket of currencies since 2014 – is now “too strong,” “killing us,” and has hurt companies trying to compete overseas. A top Trump economics advisor, Anthony Scaramucci, reinforced his boss’ sentiment adding that “we must be careful of a rising dollar."

In his latest "Nameless" podcast, Andy Nowicki examines the recent furor over Netflix's new original series, "Dear White People," which apparently contains all of the anti-white tropes we have come to know and loathe from liberal-left media and entertainment-industry types.

In a reversal of its usual "open borders" globalist-friendly policy, The Independent, a former newspaper that now ekes out a precarious living on the internet, has called for a US immigration policy based on the race and ethnicity of Nobel Prize Winners.

Consider this summary of one #Pizzagate
researcher’s alleged correspondence with James Alefantis. This communication has
entered the public record, as this researcher wound up filing a police report concerning what he believes to be terroristic threats against himself and
members of his family.

The new television drama series, The Young Pope, created and directed by Paolo Sorrentino, started off strongly.

For the first two or three episodes I felt that Sorrentino was cementing his reputation as one of the greats, but, alas, less than halfway through, the HBO series lapsed into the formulaic bathos of a common melodrama. It slowly revealed itself incapable of being the traditionalist critique that it seemed to promise at first. This was a far worse failure for me than The Great Beauty (La Grade Bellezza).

Millennial Woes' recent video entitled "The Emerging Dynamic" brought up a lot of interesting points, and I thought I should add some of my own thoughts through this article.

Perhaps one of the great unstated features of liberal egalitarianism is that it seeks equilibrium, which, for the purposes of this article, can be described as any (homogeneous or heterogeneous) group's ability to reach a theoretical consensus on the most expedient way to pacify internal conflicts (ethnic interests, social capital, and sustainable socio-econonic considerations be damned).

In this sense, what the Western World calls "egalitarianism" could be more aptly described as "coalition management," since it actively tries to (organically and through force) prevent conflict (i.e. zero-sum competition) by imposing what it considers to be the universal moral codes of "human rights" and "equality."

"I have been posting on online forums and writing on blogs for 15 years now and in that entire time the black-white gap in SAT scores in the United States hasn’t changed a bit. The years roll by and turn into decades, the egalitarian blank slate dogma endures, billions of dollars are squandered trying to achieve Martin Luther King, Jr’s Dream, politically correct fanatics hound this or that person out of polite society for some heretical comment and nothing changes:"

"What is wrong with America?"the bleeding-hearted Liberal cries. "Why can't we overturn the evil legacy of the past?"etc., etc.

Very few people make it through the thought required to analyze Leftism to its roots. On the surface, we all know what it is: an outlook of supposed compassion which supports feminism, diversity, social welfare programs, and gay rights.

Underneath the surface, Leftism reveals itself as fundamentally an "ideology," or in other words a notion that human preferences for how the world "should be" are more important than how the world actually functions. This was formalized in The Enlightenment™ as the idea of "seeing the world through human reason" as expressed in the individual.

“I am not bound to defend liberal notions of tolerance.” –Left-wing anarchist activist to the author

The rise of the New Left is typically considered to have its origins in the student rebellions of the late 1960s and early 1970s when the war in Vietnam was at its height and cultural transformation was taking place in Western countries with dizzying rapidity. Yet scholars have long recognized that the intellectual roots of the New Left were created several decades earlier through the efforts of the thinkers associated with the Institute for Social Research (commonly known as the “Frankfurt School”) to reconsider the essence of Marxist theory following the failure of the working classes of Western Europe to produce a socialist revolution as orthodox Marxism had predicted.

Why is the Establishment so fearful and emotional about Trump's temporary travel ban on seven countries? After all, Obama had a similar temporary ban on travel from Iraq. And Jimmy Carter even deported students from Iran with legal visas. So Trump's actions on the surface are not really much different. But when Trump does it, they say "American ideals" are under attack. In a way, I would agree that they are right!

Two weeks ago, the world's attention was turned towards Washington and New York with Trump's Inauguration Day and the many politically correct demonstrations and near riots surrounding the event. Women clamoring for abortion rights and unions arguing for more outsourcing managed to seize the cameras' attention for the rest of the week, not surprisingly as some of them were dressed as giant vaginas.

It was against this background of already saturated newsrooms that Statistics Canada released one of its numerous reports. Only this time the content should have made the world's headlines.

According to the governmental organization, in the year 2036 first generation and second generation immigrants will account for 49.5% of the population. Yes, immigrants and their children will account for one out of two Canadians.

The recent Screen Actors Guild Awards (SAGA) was notable for the increasingly partisan nature of many of the acceptance speeches, almost as if the actors were trying to alienate the half of their audience that voted for Trump. In particular, the speech by Stranger Things actor David Harbour seemed more like a call for violent revolution against...whatever than a simple thank you to "all the people who made this possible."

In his latest "Nameless" Podcast, Andy Nowicki discusses the manufactured rift between certain self-professed adherents to the "Alt-Right" and those whom they derisively title the "Alt-Lite." This conflict is examined in the context of stepped up attacks by sucker-punching, battery-chucking, violence-embracing antifa scum and heightened fear and loathing in the Lugenpresse towards all factions of the anti-Establishment "rebel alliance," Right and Lite alike.