Barak Obama, the candidate, said he would not hesitate to bomb
Pakistan if, as president, he decided it was appropriate to the war in
Afghanistan.Once president, he ordered the many Predator Drone
Hellfire missile strikes, seen by more cautious military minds as
counterproductive for being indiscriminate in taking innocent lives,
inciting bitter animosity, retributive reaction and increased
recruitment by those dedicated to vengeance.

When a couple of
months ago a peace was arranged in the Swat valley on terms that left
the Taliban an tribal allies in control, the Pakistani government
ordering its military to stand down in the name of ending the loss of
lives taken in the back and forth fighting, the Obama administration
showed its distress immediately. "Very concerned," was the phrase most
heard from cabinet members in reaction to this, for them, disturbing,
even shocking news.

Oh
my! was the apprehensive sounding tone of voice from Martin Savage,
Wolf Blitzer, Anderson Cooper, and all the young good looking lady news
reporters. A peace deal! With the Taliban!

From the more tough
guy demeanor of 'Hardballing' Chris Mathews, seriously dramatic Christine
Amanpour, and humor projecting Rachel Maddow the tone of voice was
incredulous rather than worried sounding.

- Advertisement -

But in less than ten
days everything took a turn for the better as these same anchors were
able to announce that the Pakistan military would be soon massively
invade a few provinces of their own country.

Once the killing
got going in a big way, with over a million refugees generated, all the
news providers took back-to-normal sounding tones of voice as they
announced the comfortably high body counts of dead Taliban and their
tribal allies along of course with the usual occasional mention of
certain unfortunate civilian casualties.

Real
civil war, with hostilities increased in scope and area, had overcome a
temporary peace scare for the Obama war hawks in Washington, their
generals in Afghanistan, and for the media personnel in the news rooms
of the cartelized TV networks of America the righteous.

- Advertisement -

Your
Buddhist archival research historian activist has written using satire
to assuage a sick-to-one's-stomach tightened gut for the tens of
thousands of Pashtuns mourning the deaths of thousands of loved ones.

For
those interested in preventive peace actions, appended below are
serious OEN articles on what the U.S. has been doing to the Pashtuns on
the other side of the British drawn Durand line:

Once
Bush II gaffed, "We cannot accept that there can be free democratic
elections in a country under foreign military occupation." Slipped his
mind Afghan and Iraq elections were being held under violent US
occupation. Colonial democracy? Human rights? Not even the right not to
be suddenly blown to pieces. Real freedom for the dead. That NO Afghani
attacked the US or elsewhere unimportant.No right to fight US & Co.
invaders.

Obama Is Responsible For Slaughtered Afghanis. No Afghani Attacked US - September 7, 2009On
Harry Truman's desk a sign read "The buck stops here!" Truman accepted
responsibility for even his vilest acts, "Bush mass-murderer!" cried
the US peace movement which imperialist media has now anesthetized.
Whose fault these massacres? US airmen? Afghani fighters defending
against invasion as they always have done? Jimmy Carter for suckering
in Russia? Ronald Reagan for supporting Taliban? Bush for invading?

No Afghani Ever Attacked the US, UK, EU, Australia or Anywhere Else - September 2, 2009(3
comments) Americans have been killing Afghanis for 8 years. And in
1979, President Carter attacked the women's liberating socialist Kabul
government by covert funding, arming and training fundamentalist hill
tribes who did not want their daughters in school. Brzezinski correctly
advised it would scare the USSR into coming to the Kabul government's
defense. That no Afghani ever attacked the US is unimportant. Neither
did the Vietnamese

Would Americans tolerate and peaceably
cooperate with an invasion and occupation of the U.S. by Iraqi, Afghani, and Somali
army and marines with Pakistani Predator drones hanging in the air over
the countryside targeting bad-guy Americans with Hellfire misilles under
the pretext of protecting their countries from terrorists hiding in
America, though no American had lifted a hand against their Muslim
homelands? Would Americans have accepted bombardment and occupation by
Vietnamese, Laotian, Cambodian and Korea military?

Are
Americans as a nation mentally challenged? Are their brains gone soft
and addled from watching and listening to thousands of hours of hyper
TV commercial advertising?

Do they really believe everything
they are told by CNN and backed up by slant and inference and omission
in the New York Times? Can they never put themselves in the shoes of
those Third World inhabitants they have butchered by the millions?

- Advertisement -

If
a Nobel Prize jury hails an American president as peace promoting, it
must be so. "And I," as Dorothy Parker once quipped, "am Queen Marie of
Romania!"

Jay Janson is an archival research peoples historian activist, musician and writer; has lived and worked on all continents; articles on media published in China, Italy, UK, India and the US; now resides in NYC; First effort was a series of (more...)