Piers babbling bad for us? Not!

Video of Piers being debated by 2 women. He loses and even wads up and throws his script. The women lose as well IMO as everyone's really talking over each other as usual. I see it as he's a babbling idiot and actually makes his side look like losers. Anyone disagree? Sure, he's getting attention, but is it really the attention the antis are seeking?

The one outstanding vid of him getting it handed to him, was by Ted Nugent, believe it or not. Ted spoke over him in a way he had NO way of getting a word in and made great points. Ask and I'll post a link if it hasn't been done. It's almost a year old so likely been posted.

When did he become the authority on laws and guns in America? The best thing that we can all do is not watch him, I only saw him at the gym, because it was already on the tv, I won't tune in his show.
He always his an ass about everything. If you watched him on "The Apprentice", you would understand he has a personality flaw. He can't stand anyone who does anything better than he does, or is smarter.
He just talks over people like the old timers like "Joe Pine" and several others, theyramble on and shut you down. It's tragic that we allow this type of news show on CNN which used to be a respectable network during the 80's and 90's, I remember watching live reporting from battle zones, when no one else would go there.

radiotom

January 18, 2013, 10:39 AM

I think he has more estrogen than his guests did.

throdgrain

January 18, 2013, 11:21 AM

He's a wanker, please keep him over there :eek:

youngda9

January 18, 2013, 11:27 AM

His strategy is to get the opponent to agree to some extreme position and then claim that discredits anything they actually have to say about the subject being discussed.

Well personally just about any European lecturing Americans on just about any subject generally has a negative effect on me. When it comes to guns America and the British views on guns were established at Concord and just went down hill from there.

Blackstone

January 18, 2013, 01:01 PM

It's because our government love us so much and want to look after us, and it makes us want to spread the love ;)

KMatch

January 18, 2013, 01:07 PM

Personally, I can't see any reason to be offended. If he had any clue, maybe, but he's all out of useful data after 2 sentences. Yes, guns can be dangerous and yes, assault type weapons were used in the last 4 mass murders. That's his whole defense. So every time he brings in a new guest, he uses those arguments and the guest likely brings up fresh material the previous left out. So, piece by piece, there's more and more data being presented on why high capacity mags are good, while the only defense against them is, "guns can be dangerous and assault weapons were used in the last 4 mass murders". See what I mean? Let the idiot ramble! His thought process ran out LOOOOONG ago and as a result, we get more and more broadcast against his idiocy. Then, when we're done with him, let me know where to send the funds for my part of his return ticket to home.