On Jul 9, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> you gave reenabled "sbclean": the only difference to ooo340 it contains
> are some masterfixes on the dev300 code line that are in ooo340 anyway
> (otherwise the code couldn't have been built). That's the reason why I
> left it disabled. We can remove it from the list.
Yes, CWS sbclean was my "dummy clean master CWS for testing," just tracking tip of DEV300.
Drop it.
-Stephan