The Syrians, and only the Syrians, must decide for themselves their own fate. Personally, I want Assad to stay in power. These "rebels" or "freedom fighters" as the media lovingly portrays them, are nothing more than terrorists to Syria's regime. Assad has done nothing wrong, and as the head of state in Syria, he has the right to put down and deal with these "rebels" as he sees fit.

Then again, I am not in Syria, so I can not give an unbiased opinion. So long as there are rebels, let them fight. So long as Assad remains president, let him defend to the death his Syrian regime. Either way, I really couldn't care much less. What goes on the Mideast barely concerns me, as my concerns lie with white countries. That is where all of our loyalties and concerns should lie, because those problems going on right now directly effect us, unlike Syria

However, I do not go around categorizing the Syrians as white, I can clearly see the Arab distinction in their facial structure.

Ironically, it's the most extremist muslims that the US government/military is siding with and aiding in Syria. I'm about sure that it was our "intelligence agencies" who agitated/funded the start of the recent fighting there.

The middle east is a monster clusterfvk and there's no doubt in my mind that a large part of the blame lays with "Western intelligence agencies", governments and military's. More the "governments" and those in power and control behind the scenes than anything else.

It should be common knowledge around here why.

There's nothing ironic about it at all. The US has a long history of propping up Islamists to destabilize the pan-Arab/secular governments in that region who are friendly to Russia and reject Israeli influence.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenacious

You're heartless, some Whites live there still with Greek genes flowing through their veins.

Any unnecessary killing of humans or even animals is wrong. They can be white or brown, that is irrelevant.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaveTheWhiteRace

I think the number of 50,000 is overstated. Why would 50,000 Russians and Ukrainians want to go fight in a God forsaken land like Syria?

Because the survival of Russia is dependent on it being able to form alliances with its neighbors. If Syria falls into the hands of NATO after this then surely Iran will be next. You have to be living under a rock not to know that the last 10 years of NATO military intervention have indirectly been against Russia and any other non-NATO owned country.

when Israel bombed Syria recently S&B Kerry went there for a meeting with Putin.
This was Russia's move following the meeting.

These are all strategic moves against Russia.

The real question is "Why is the US supporting Al-Qaeda in Syria"...

Because Assad is one of the few remaining non-puppet leaders in the middle east. He's an ally of Russia, he's a secularist, and he's rejecting western economic influence in Syria. As a result, the US/NATO will do whatever it takes to get him out of power and install someone who is more favorable. It's neocolonialism in its most quintessential form.

Ever go to school with the insecure, little kid who was always trying to start confrontations and get others to fight to keep everyone from criticizing him?

The Syrians surprised a lot of people by not rolling over easily. Agree with him or like him or not, Assad has got a pair and constantly stands up to Israel and the neocons, who are going to have a lot of egg on their face after this one.