Why are Blago’s attorneys silent in the face of the Tribune’s claim that there’sabsolutely nothing, nada, zilch, on the Blago tapes to support their assertion of Blago’s innocence?

How come Blago’s attorneys are not standing outside the U.S. Attorney's Ofiice screaming about how access to the tapes and transcripts was given exclusively to the two Trib reporters?

The two reporters-authors of Golden claim there is nothing on the fed’s wiretaps of Blago’s phone conversations to suggest that Blago is innocent.

Recall that Sam Adam, Jr. was the lead attorney for Blago back in 2009 when Blago’s legal defense team agreed to the protective orderdealing with the government’s evidence.

Throughout that episode, we were led to believe that Judge James Zagel restricted Blago and his attorneys from discussing the content of Blago’s phone calls recorded by the feds.

But now we know that wasn’t true and that there was, and still is, absolutely nothing, nada, zilch,preventingBlago and/or his brother, Robert Blagojevich, from talking about the recorded conversations.

On Dec 8, 2011, Sam Adam, Jr. went on the recordsaying,“I’ve said this from day one, having listened to them – not just talking, having listened to them – I honestly believe in my gut, there is no doubt that this trial would have been different. I honestly believe there is no doubt that this case would have been different, and if I’m wrong, why can’t we hear them now?”

Well, that’s a crystal clear statement. But wait…

The Trib reporters-authors, John chase and Jeff Coen, who’ve now listened to the tapes, have stated, for the record, that there is nothing on them supporting claims of Blago’s innocence.

Oh, and by the way, Sam Adam, Jr. has been named as a possible candidate to replace Jesse Jackson, Jr. as part of a pending Jackson plea agreement. But, of course, that would have nothing to do with all this Blago stuff, would it?