> > The X proposal is incompatible with all current usage as it
> requires
> > all literals to be replaced with URVs.
Actually no. It doesn't require it, even if it does advise it.
And apologies for not getting the summary out
sooner. URV's are a useful component of the X proposal, but
not the heart of it.
Have a look at my posting today, and let me know what you
think.
Patrick