1. The spelling, accents, and diacritical marks of Sanskrit words was not consistent through the book. These have been made consistent.

2. The corrections noted in the Corrigenda on page v have been made in the text.

HINDU LAW AND JUDICATURE

FROM THE

DHARMA-SASTRA

of

YAJNAVALKYA

In English

WITH EXPLANATORY NOTES AND INTRODUCTION

BY

EDWARD ROeER, ph. D., M. D.

AND W. A. MONTRIOU, BARRISTER.

Calcutta:

R. C. LEPAGE & CO., BRITISH LIBRARY.

London:

R. C. LEPAGE & CO., 1, WHITEFRIAR'S STREET, FLEET STREET

1859.

* * * * *

PREFACE.

The immediate incentive to this undertaking was, a knowledge, or at least a strong impression, that a connected and explanatory translation of the rules of jurisprudence[1] in the Dharma Sastra of Yajnavalkya was a practical want.

Such impression was coincided in, and therefore proved correct, by a long list of local subscribers eminently qualified, by position and experience, to decide.

Dr. Roeer is responsible for the fidelity of the rendering, so far as depends on knowledge of the Sanscrit language and literature, of Hindu mythology and philosophy. Mr. Montriou has aided, so far as enabled by juridical acquirements and experience. The language of translation has, therefore, been a joint labour, often the result of much and anxious discussion, and, if not unfrequently but a choice of doubtful alternatives, yet, always a choice made with pains and circumspection.

The text we have generally followed is Stenzler's[2] which is based on and selected from two MSS. in the royal library at Berlin and two editions published in Calcutta.[3]

We have not neglected constant comparison with Stenzler's German translation as well as with the several detached passages as translated by Colebrooke and W. Macnaghten.

Words within brackets ( [ ] ) are not in the original text.

References to, and extracts from, the standard commentary upon Yajnavalkya, the Mitakshara, necessarily form the staple of our notes. All such extracts are distinguished by the initial (M.), and the author of the commentary we invariably refer to as, the Commentator.

At the same time, we have not blindly or implicitly followed this commentator. In some sense all Hindu glosses are untrustworthy guides. They assume the text to be the language of inspiration; and, as the several Dharma Sastras not merely differ, but often dispose of the same subject in a contradictory manner, Pandits deem it their duty to reconcile all discrepancies, how forced soever their interpretations may be. In passages so dealt with, we have endeavoured to give the plain meaning of the original text.

We gratefully acknowledge the obliging assistance, in research, enquiry, and suggestion, occasionally afforded, in the progress of our task, by Babus, Chandra Saikhur Dev[4] and Shyamacharana Sircar.[5]

Of the above list, twenty (distinguished by one cross) are in Yajnavalkya's list:[7] seventeen of these are named by Parasara, viz. all except Yama, Brihaspati and Vyasa, instead of whom he gives Kasyapa, Gargya and Prachetas: the Padma Purana gives those named by Yajnavalkya, with the exception of Atri, and seventeen others, (distinguished by two crosses) three of whom, Prachetas, Kasyapa and Gargya, are on Parasara's list, and the remaining fourteen, not before mentioned: Madhusudana Saraswati names the same nineteen of Yajnavalkya's list, also Devala, Narada, Paithinasi: Rama Krishna, in his gloss to the Grihya Sutras of Paraskara, mentions thirty-nine, of whom nine (distinguished by three crosses) are new ones. There is also a Dharma Sastra attributed to Sankha and Likhita jointly, thus making forty-seven in the whole. The professor considers all to be extant; and has himself met with quotations from all, except Agni, Kuthumi, Budha, Satyayana, and Soma.

To those may be added several recensions of the same Dharma Sastras, of which professor Stenzler speaks to having read of twenty-two.

The entire forty-seven are independent sources of and authorities upon Hindu law.

The Digest of Jagannat'ha Tarcapanchanana, as translated by Colebrooke, is a valuable repertory of texts; but, detached and isolated as they necessarily are, those texts can with difficulty be appreciated or applied.

Yajnavalkya is second in importance to Manu alone: and, with the commentary, is the leading authority of the Mithila school.

The resident of British India needs not to be informed, that the orthodox Hindu regards his Dharma Sastras as direct revelations of the Divine will: still less need such an one be told, that, among this people, law is entirely subservient to the mysterious despotism of cast,[8] a religious, rather than a political ordinance.

With the Hindu, all religious tenets and aspirations are centred in the idea of BRAHMA, the one, pervading, illimitable substance, without multiple, division or repetition. This idea has two modes or phases, 1st. as representing the absolute, self-included Brahma; 2nd. as representing Brahma in connection with, relative to, the world. In the latter, Brahma is creator of the world, or, the very world, a semblance or a development of the former, the absolute idea. Man's highest aspiration and aim is, to know Brahma absolutely: to have attained this knowledge implies a total renunciation of worldly concerns, to coalesce with, to be ultimately absorbed in, reunited with, Brahma. Brahmanas are held to possess, to represent, this knowledge. Again, Brahma is the creator, the preserver, also, the objects created and preserved. Kshattriyas represent Brahma, the preserver: Vaisyas, Brahma the preserved. The dogma is otherwise explained: in the secondary or relative notion, Brahma is Sattwa, Rajas, Tamas, i. e. goodness, activity, darkness,—respectively represented by the Brahmana, Kshattriya, and Vaisya casts.

When the Hindus dwelt in the country of the five rivers, and were worshippers of the powers and phenomena of material Nature, as of Indra, Vayu, Agni &c., cast was necessarily unknown, for the notion of Brahma was undeveloped.

The divisions or classes among them were conventional; there were princes, priests, and peasants or cultivators.

But class distinction had not then crystallized into cast, into immiscible, uncongenial yet co-ordinate elements of a so called revealed constitution.

So soon however as the idea of Brahma had attained fixity in the Hindu mind, and simultaneously with it, cast was developed, as we find it (but imperfectly) in the earliest records of Hindu philosophy, the Upanishads.

Thus, cast governs and is antecedent to law, which must bend and adapt itself to cast, as the overruling, intrinsic, unalterable condition of Hinduism, of Hindu life. There is one law, one phase of obligation for the twice-born, another for the Sudra. In Manu, cast is not so fully and severely developed: Manu permits to the Brahmana four wives, of whom one may be a Sudra, necessarily permitting, therefore, a transition or quasi-amalgamation between the highest and the lowest in the scale. Yajnavalkya permits this Brahmanical communion with the Kshattriya and Vaisya, but not with the Sudra. Later promulgators of law,[9] restrict the Brahmana to his own class.

But although cast, once developed, admitted not of change, juridical rules, subservient to cast, might and did progress: civil laws and procedure became more comprehensive and exact, the criminal code more regulated, lenient, and enlightened. And as universally, (for such is human,) breaches and occasional disregard of rules have, silently though surely, worked a change, or caused exceptional accessions to the rules themselves.

The rule of the Sastras, that kingly power should belong to the Kshattriya alone, was, even in the halcyon days of Hindu polity, repeatedly set aside. Chandragupta, a Sudra, and his dynasty, held sway over India from 315 to 173 B. C.: afterwards came Brahmanical kings, the Kanwas, from 66 to 21 B. C.: whilst the mighty Gupta kings, from 150 to 280 A. C., were Vaisyas.

The code of Manu presents a disarranged mass of regulations, in so much that some have supposed the disorder to have been designed.

That conclusion, however, is repelled by the comparatively succinct arrangement of Yajnavalkya and other sages. It is more consistent to suppose, that Manu, as originally promulgated, was, from time to time, added to, with an accidental disregard of method.

Achara, ritual, comprises the distinctive cast-ceremonies, domestic and social usages, rites of purification, of sacrifice.

Vyavahara, may be called the juridical rules, embracing as well substantive law as the procedure and practice of legal tribunals.

Prayaschitta, expiations, are the religious sanctions, or penalties of sin; the divine visitation upon offenders, and the mode in which the sinner may avert, by atonement, the consequences of divine vengeance.

The date of Yajnavalkya's Dharma Sastra is not definitely or satisfactorily fixed. From internal evidence, it is doubtless much subsequent to Manu.

The data for conjecturing the period of Yajnavalkya are;

1. Reference is made to Buddhist habits and doctrines, viz. the yellow garments, the baldhead, the Swabhava (B. I. sl. 271, 272, and 349).

Hence, this Dharma Sastra must have been promulgated later than B. C. 500.

2. Reference is made to a previous Yoga Sastra promulgated by Yajnavalkya (B. III, sl. 110). Now, the Yoga philosophy was first shaped into a system by Patanjali who, according to Lassen, probably flourished about 200 B. C.

3. Mention is made of coin as nanaka (B. II, sl. 240). Now, the word nano occurs on the coins of the Indoscythian king, Kanerki, who, according to Lassen, reigned until 40 A. C.

The result, though indefinite, places the earliest date of Yajnavalkya's code towards the middle of the first century after Christ.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 6: See his paper Zur Geschichte der Indischen Gesetzbucher (Contributions to the history of the Indian law-books) in Weber's Indische Studien, vol. I, pp. 232 to 246.]

[Footnote 7: Yajnavalkya, ch. I, sl. 3 to 5.]

[Footnote 8: We have followed Mr. Elphinstone (Hist. ch. 1) in the orthography of this word: it is from the Portuguese casta, breed, race.]

[Footnote 9: See Lassen's Indische Alterthumskunde, vol. II, p. 510.]

SELECTED SLOKAS OF THE FIRST BOOK.

RITUAL AND MORAL CONDUCT.[10]

1. The Munis[11] after adoration to Yajnavalkya, lord of Yogis,[12] thus addressed him:

Reveal to us the several duties of the casts, of the orders,[13] and of the others![14]

2. The prince of the Yogis, who then abode in Mithila, meditating for a moment, said to the Munis: Hearken to the rules of duty in the country of the black antelope![15]

3. There are fourteen repositories[16] of the sciences and of law; the four Vedas together with the Puranas, the Nyaya, the Mimansa, the Dharma Sastras, and the six Angas.[17]

6. When a gift is made, in due season, place and manner, in good faith and to a fit person—all this gives the idea of Law.

7. The Sruti, the Smriti,[19] the practice of good men, what seems good to one's self,[20] and a desire maturely considered—these are declared to be the root[21] of Law.

9. Four learned in the Vedas and in the Law form a Court, or Traividya.[22] Whatever is declared by this [Court], or by a single person who has, in an eminent degree, knowledge of the soul in its relations[23]—the same should be [held as] Law.

10. Brahmans, Kshattriyas, Vaisyas and Sudras are the casts: of them the three first are twice-born; all their rites, commencing with the procreative rites, and ending with those [which are gone through] where the corpse is disposed of,[24] are with Mantras.[25]

14. In the eighth year from conception, or in the eighth [of birth],[26] the investiture[27] of the Brahman [takes place]; of Rajas[28] in the eleventh; of Vaisyas in the twelfth: some [have said, this varies] in accordance with [the usage of] the family.

39. Brahmans, Kshattriyas, and Vaisyas are born, first, of their mothers, and, a second time, by the girding on of the sacred thread—therefore are they declared to be twice-born.

116. [Men] are to be honoured in the gradation following,—in respect of learning, conduct, years, family, property. Even a Sudra, if he excel in these respects, is in old age worthy of honour.

326. The monarch, at his rising [from the night's repose], having seen to the [general] safety, shall himself inspect the [account of] revenue and disbursements; he shall then adjudicate law-suits; after which, having bathed,[29] he may, at his pleasure, take his meal.[30]

342. Of a newly subjugated territory, the monarch shall preserve the social and religious usages, also the judicial system and the state of classes as they already obtain.[31]

352. A ruler, a minister, people, a stronghold, treasure, [power of] punishment, and allies—because these are its elements, a realm is called seven-limbed.

353. When possessed of this, let a monarch cause punishment to fall on the guilty; for, of old, justice was created by Brahma under the form of punishment.[32]

357. A brother even, or a son, any one to whom respect is due, a father-in-law or maternal uncle, if he transgress, is not to go unpunished by the monarch.

358. The monarch who punishes such as deserve punishment, who slays such as deserve death: he is as one who has made many sacrifices with valuable offerings.[33]

359. Every day should the monarch, pondering on his reward (such as sacrifices gain), himself investigate law-suits in their order with the judges around him.

360. The monarch, always duly correcting [those among] the casts, the mixed classes, the guilds, the schools[34] [of the learned], and the people [in general], who have deviated from their duty, should set them in the [right] path.

361. A particle of dust in the sunbeams, as they shine through a window, is held to consist of three atoms; eight of those [particles] are equal to a poppy seed, of which three are equal to a black mustard seed;

362. Three of these to a white mustard seed, three of these to a barley seed of middle size, three of these to a Krishnala berry,[35] five of these to a Masha,[36] sixteen of these to a Suvarna.[37]

363. A Pala is four or five[38] Suvarnas. Two Krishnalas are a silver Masha; sixteen of the latter, a Dharana.

364. A Satamana and a Pala are each equal to ten Dharanas: a Nishka is four Suvarnas: a copper Pana is of the weight of a Karsha.[39]

365. One thousand and eighty Panas is declared the highest fine; half of that amount the medium fine; and half of this the lowest fine.

366. Reproof, words of ignominy, fine, and death,[40] shall be administered, singly or together, according to the crime.[41]

367. [The monarch] having informed himself of the crime, the place where, and the time when [committed], the strength [of the criminal, his] age, calling, and means, shall cause punishment to fall upon the guilty.[42]

[Inverted "therefore" symbol] The foregoing extracts, it will have been observed, are of general application, and do not refer to any part of the law in detail. Several slokas in the first book, however, and some in the third, do refer to and affect the details of law, which are the proper subject of the second book, where therefore they are inserted, according to their subject.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 10: This is the general subject and title of the first book; but the following slokas are selected as introductory of and with reference to civil and municipal law.]

[Footnote 11: Pre-eminent, divine sages; probably the great Rishis, the first-created of Brahma, mentioned in the opening verse of Manu.

In the third book (sl. 186—189) two classes of Munis are described, of whom one, after blessed experience of Heaven, return to Earth, and the other are to continue in the abodes of bliss until the destruction of the universe. These latter are the publishers of the Vedas, Upanishads, Sutras, Puranas, in fine of all records of knowledge through the medium of language.]

[Footnote 12: These (according to Hindu notions) have withdrawn their senses from external things by, as it were, mental concentration, fixing the thoughts, without change or wavering, upon the soul in its relations with the Supreme Being.]

[Footnote 13: viz.—the brahmachari, the student of the Vedas,

the grihastha, the head of a family.

the vanaprastha, who has retired from active life, to the forest.

the sanyasi, whose duty it is to pass his time in meditating upon Brahma, so as to attain to the state of a Yogi.]

[Footnote 14: i. e. the mixed casts. (M.)]

[Footnote 15: Manu, ch. 2, sl. 23.]

[Footnote 16: The Commentator explains this by a word which signifies cause or source.]

[Footnote 17: IV. Vedas, of which there are four, each being divided into sanhita and brahmana.

V. Puranas, these (of which there are 18) treat of the origin and destruction of the world, mythological stories and genealogies, and the doings of the early Hindu monarchs.

VI. Nyaya, one of the six orthodox systems of Hindu philosophy, treating especially of logic and dialectics.

VII. Mimansa, there are two Mimansas: the first (purva) treats of the rules of duty, as derived from the Vedas, the second or subsequent (uttara) treats of Brahma, the universal cause and soul.

[Footnote 18: To these twenty many others have to be added, Narada, &c.: see Introduction.]

[Footnote 19: Sruti are the Vedas; Smriti, the Dharma Sastras: such is the definition of Manu, ch. 2, sl. 10.]

[Footnote 20: The Commentator qualifies this indefinite source of law, as applicable only where two or more lawful alternatives are presented.]

[Footnote 21: Further explained by the Commentator, the evidence or proofs of law; and he adds, the several proofs mentioned, where they clash, are of weight and authority according to their precedence, e.g. Sruti the highest, the mature desire the lowest, Manu, ch. 2, sl. 6, 12.]

[Footnote 22: Which means, having knowledge of the three Vedas. See Manu, ch. 12, sl. 110 to 113.]

[Footnote 23: To explain or enlarge upon this metaphysical phrase would be out of place in the present work. The curious student can refer to the Upanishads and the Vedanta.]

[Footnote 24: Which, in the time of our author, meant, the place of cremation. In the third book, sl. 1, 2, Yajnavalkya says:—A child under two years of age is to be buried, nor shall water be offered; every other deceased, being followed by his relatives to the place for disposal of the dead, shall there be burned.

It was certainly otherwise at the period of the Vedas (vide Die Todtenbestattung im indischen Alterthum. German Oriental Society's Journal, Vol. VIII. pp. 467—475): the paraphrase in the text is the meaning of the term used, smasana.]

[Footnote 25: Texts of the Vedas to be recited on solemn occasions. See analogous passage, Manu ch. 2, sl. 16.]

[Footnote 26: So we supply the hiatus in the text, in conformity with the opinion of the Commentator. Manu makes no allusion to the alternative, ch. 2, sl. 36.]

[Footnote 27: Induction into the character and privileges of his cast, by means of the sacred thread.]

[Footnote 28: who, being Kshattriyas, here represent the cast.]

[Footnote 29: at mid-day. (M.)]

[Footnote 30: Manu ch. 7, sl. 216.]

[Footnote 31: ibid, 201 et seq.]

[Footnote 32: ibid, 13, 41.]

[Footnote 33: Manu ch. 8, sl. 306.]

[Footnote 34: The Commentator explains the general expression here used by the word haituka, of which one meaning is that given in the text, but it also signifies, those who do not believe in the Vedas.]

[Footnote 35: retti or gunja, a shrub bearing a small red and black berry. Wilson.]

[Footnote 36: A sort of kidney bean, phasealus radiatus. Wilson.]

[Footnote 37: About 176 grains Troy weight. Wilson.]

[Footnote 38: Manu says four.]

[Footnote 39: These tables of weight, as further explained by the Commentator, may be given thus:

3 Atoms = 1 Mote.

8 Motes = 1 Poppy seed or a nit.

3 Poppy seeds or 3 nits = 1 Black mustard seed.

3 Black mustard seeds = 1 White mustard seed.

3 White mustard seeds = 1 Barley corn.

3 Barley corns = 1 Krishnala.

Gold.

5 Krishnalas = 1 Masha.

16 Mashas = 1 Suvarna.

4 Suvarnas = 1 Pala.

Silver.

2 Krishnalas = 1 Masha.

16 Mashas = 1 Dharana.

10 Dharanas = 1 Pala or Satamana.

4 Suvarnas = 1 Nishka.

Copper.

4 Karshas = 1 Pala.

1 Pana = 1 Karsha i. e. 1/4 Pala.

They by no means satisfactorily define the intrinsic weight and signification of the Pana, which, as the measure of pecuniary penalty, would seem to be the chief if not sole object of their introduction.

In the corresponding slokas of Manu, ten Palas are said to be equivalent to one Dharana. We can only reconcile this by supposing Manu to refer to a gold Pala and Yajnavalkya to a silver Pala.]

[Footnote 40: The Commentator remarks, that this includes every kind of corporal punishment.]

[Footnote 41: Manu, ch. 8, sl. 129, 130.]

[Footnote 42: ibid, sl. 126, also ch. 7, sl. 16. In the last passage, Sir Wm. Jones has added to the term, strength, his own; this we consider to be an error, at any rate it is not a mere translation, and we have applied the term used, viz.strength simpliciter, differently.]

THE SECOND BOOK

LAW AND JUDICATURE.

1. Let the monarch,[43] free from anger or thought of gain, in conjunction with learned brahmans, adjudicate law-suits, according to the Dharma Sastras.

2. He shall appoint judges perfect in the Vedas and in science,[44] versed in the Dharma Sastras, such as speak truth and bear themselves alike to friend and foe.

3. If the monarch, from press of other business, cannot adjudicate, he shall appoint a brahman versed in the whole law, [to preside] with the judges.[45]

4. Should the judges, from partiality, from love of gain, or from fear, act in anywise contrary to law or usage;[46] each one [so acting] shall be amerced in double the value of the suit.

5. When one who is aggrieved by others, in any way contrary to law or usage, makes a representation to the monarch; this is matter for a law-suit.

6. The representation, as made by the plaintiff, is to be put in writing, in presence of the defendant; the year, month, half-month, day, names, cast, &c.,[47] being given.

7. The answer [of the defendant] to what he has heard [read] is then to be put in writing, in presence of him who made the first representation: and then the latter shall, at once, furnish a statement in writing of the proof to support what he has asserted.

8. This being established, he succeeds in his suit; otherwise, the reverse. Thus it appears, the procedure in law-suits has four steps.

9. Let not a counter-complaint be preferred until the [original] complaint is disposed of, nor let a third person [sue] him against whom a complaint is pending.[48] The statement of the cause of suit is not to be varied.[49]

10. [The defendant] may bring a counter-plaint for abusive language,[50] or personal trespass,[50] or for acts of atrocious violence.[51] On behalf of each party, a surety, competent to meet the result of the suit, shall be bound.

11. One against whom, after [a plea of] denial, judgment is given, shall pay the amount [adjudged to the plaintiff] together with an equal sum to the monarch.[52] One who has made a false complaint, shall forfeit double the amount of his claim.

12. In a case of atrocious violence, of theft, of reviling or personal trespass,[53] where a cow is the subject, or a [malicious] charge of crime,[54] or an offence destructive of life or property[54] where a female [of the household] is the subject—[in each of these cases] the Court shall compel the parties to go to trial forthwith. In other cases, a day may be appointed at pleasure.

13. One who moves from place to place,[55] who licks the corners of his mouth, whose forehead sweats, and whose countenance changes colour.

14. who with words from a dry throat, stammering, says much that is contradictory, who makes no response to word or look, who contracts the lips—

15. whosoever [in this wise] changes his natural manner, in the action of his mind, of his speech, and of his person, is to be set down as false in his complaint, or [if a witness] in his testimony.[56]

16. One who enforces by his own arbitrary act a claim which is denied, who absconds, or who does not respond when called—[each of these] is considered to have failed, and is amenable to punishment.[57]

17. Where there are [rival claims, and] witnesses on both sides, the witnesses of him who asserts the elder title, are to be [first] examined: if that title be admitted,[58] then the witnesses of him who claims by subsequent title [shall be examined].[59]

18. Should the suit be accompanied by a wager, [the Court] shall compel the losing party to pay the fine [prescribed],[60] as well as his wager and his debt to the creditor.

19. Let the monarch, rejecting subtleties, conduct the trial of suits upon the merits: even merits, in the absence of proof, must fail of success in the suit.

20. If one plead a denial to a representation including several matters,[61] and one part be proved against him, the monarch shall compel him to pay the whole amount claimed: but what has not been previously declared [by the plaintiff][62] is inadmissible.

21. If two texts of the Law be opposed to each other, an argument founded on usage is of force; but the Dharma Sastra is of greater force than the Artha Sastra.[63] This is a settled rule.

22. Legal proofs are described as, writing, possession, and witnesses.

In the absence of either of those, it is ordained, that some one of the ordeals is [to be resorted to.]

23. In all disputes where property is concerned, the last act is of greater force;[64] except in [cases of] pledge, gift,[65] and sale, when the first act is of greater force.[66]

24. If one see[67] his land in the possession of another[68] and say nothing, it is lost after twenty years; moveables after ten years:[69]

25. excepting pledges, boundary-limits, deposits with specification,[70] property of idiots and children, deposits without specification,[71] property of the monarch, of women, and of those learned in the Vedas.

26. One who appropriates[72] a pledge, &c., shall be compelled to restore to the owner his property, and to pay a fine of equal value, or according to his means,[73] to the monarch.

27. Acquisition by title[74] is stronger[75] than possession, unless this has come down from ancestors;[76] but acquisition by title is of no avail without possession for a short time.[77]

28. If one holding by title have it questioned [in a Court of justice], he must establish it by proof: but not so his son, nor his son's son; in their case, possession is of greater weight.

29. If one whose title is questioned die [pending the suit[78]], his heir must establish it by proof; in such case possession without title will not avail.[79]

30. Those appointed by the monarch,[80] communities,[81] guilds,[82] and families, have authority, one after the other,[83] to investigate law-suits among men.

31. The monarch shall annul decisions of suits which have been brought about by force or fraud; also those made by women, those made at night, those made in private chambers, those made in a place beyond the limits,[84] and those made by enemies.

32. A suit instituted by one intoxicated, or insane, or stricken with disease,[85] or given up to vice,[86] or a minor, or one under the influence of fear, &c.,[87] or one having no interest, is invalid.

33. When lost property is found,[88] it shall be restored by the monarch to the owner: if the claimant fail to identify by some sign, he shall pay an equivalent fine.

34. If the monarch find a treasure,[89] he shall give half of it to the twice-born.[90] If, on the other hand, a twice-born [find a treasure], he shall, if learned, take the whole, for he is lord of all.[91]

35. Of treasure found by any one else,[92] the monarch shall take a sixth.[93] If the finder do not make report, but [his discovery] comes to light, he shall surrender [what he has found], and shall, besides, be punished.

36. Stolen property, however, is to be given up by the monarch to the subject; seeing that, if he do not give it, he shall bear all the sin of that person from whom [it is stolen].[94]

37. Where there is a pledge, the interest, month by month, shall be an eightieth part; otherwise, two, three, four or five parts, in a hundred, according to the order of cast.[95]

38. They however who travel in forests[96] give ten parts; they who go to sea, twenty parts, in a hundred. Or, all[97] must render to all, of whatever cast, the rate of interest settled amongst themselves.[98]

39. But for cattle and women lent [the return] is, their offspring: the highest encrease demandable for use of liquids[99] is eight-fold; for wearing apparel, for corn, and for gold, four-fold, three-fold and two-fold respectively.

40. The monarch should not blame one who enforces a recognised debt.[100] If he, against whom the debt is enforced, complain to the monarch, he may be punished, besides being compelled to pay the debt.

41. The debtor [as a general rule] shall be made to pay his creditors in the order in which he has received from them; but a brahman he is to pay [first], and, after him, the monarch.

42. The debtor shall be made to pay to the monarch ten parts in a hundred of the sum proved against him;[101] and the creditor, when he has recovered his property, five parts.[102]

43. One of inferior cast,[103] who is without means, may be compelled to labour[104] in discharge of his debt; but a brahman,[105] wanting means [to discharge his debt at once], shall pay gradually in proportion to what may come to him.

44. If one do not accept restitution of his property on loan when offered, it is to be delivered to some third party; from which time it ceases to carry interest.

45. A debt incurred by undivided kinsmen on account of the family shall be discharged by the heirs of the head of the family, should the latter die or leave the country.[106]

46. A woman has not to pay a debt incurred by her husband or by her son, nor a father the debt of his son; except such debts be incurred on account of the family: and it is the same with a husband [in respect of a debt] incurred by his wife.

47. A son has not to pay, in this world, his father's debt incurred for spirituous liquor,[107] or, for gratification of lust, or in gambling, nor a fine, nor what remains unpaid of a toll; nor [shall he make good] idle gifts.[108]

48. As to debts of wives of herdsmen, distillers, players, washermen and hunters, the husbands have to pay; because their maintenance depends upon their wives.

49. A debt acknowledged,[109] one incurred by her jointly with her husband, one incurred by herself [solely][110]—these must be paid by the wife; none other need be paid by her.

50. If a father have gone abroad, or died, or been subdued by calamity,[111] his debt shall be paid by his sons and grandsons;[112] on their denial,[113] the debt must be proved by witnesses.

51. He who takes the property of one who leaves no [capable][114] son, shall pay the debts; so, he who takes[115] the widow; also that son whose paternal estate no other has appropriated, [and who in such case shall always be deemed] fit to inherit property;[116] and if one die without any son, then, whosoever succeeds to the property.

52. To become surety, to be indebted, and to give evidence, is unlawful between brothers, between husband and wife, or between father and son; except, where they are separated in property.

53. Giving surety is enjoined for appearance, for confidence,[117] and for payment.[118] If there be a failure of either of the first two, the surety [himself] in each case shall pay; of the third, his sons [also] must pay.

54. If surety for appearance or for confidence die, the sons have not to pay; of a surety for payment, the sons have to pay.[119]

55. If there are several sureties, they shall pay the debt according to their respective liabilities: if all have undertaken for the entire debt,[120] they shall [severally be made to] pay at the option of the creditor.

56. If a surety be compelled by process of law[121] to discharge the debt, the [principal] debtors shall reimburse him double the amount paid.

57. For [use of] women and cattle, the offspring shall be given: for corn, [a return of] three fold; for apparel, four fold; for liquids, eight fold.

58. [The owner's property in] a pledge is forfeited if it be not redeemed when the debt is doubled; of one made for a definite period, it is forfeited at the specified date. [The property in] a pledge with usufruct[122] does not become forfeit.

59. If a [simple] pledge be put to use, no interest is [demandable]: so it is if a pledge with usufruct be damaged. If the pledge be wholly spoiled or be destroyed, it must be replaced; except where caused by accident,[123] or by the monarch.[124]

60. A pledge is complete upon acceptance.[125] If the thing pledged have become worthless, although [duly] cared for, either another shall be given [in its place], or the creditor shall receive back his money.

61. If a pledge be [given or taken, in reliance] upon character,[126] the debtor shall be made to pay with interest: the debtor shall be made to repay two-fold, if he received on his plighted word.[127]

62. If one come [and pay his debt], the pledge shall be released; otherwise he [who has the pledge] is a thief:[128] should the creditor be absent, the debtor is to receive back his pledge upon paying the debt to the family;[129]

63. Or it may remain where it was, without interest [on the debt], the value at that date [of the thing pledged] being ascertained. If the debtor fail to come, the creditor may sell [the pledge] before witnesses.

64. If the debt secured by pledge have become doubled, the pledge shall be released; provided, the [value of the] usufruct of the thing pledged be double [the amount of] the loan.[130]

65. Upanidhi is something in a box delivered to the hands of another, without a declaration. This shall be restored in the same manner [as it was given].[131]

66. But one shall not be compelled to make good that of which he has been deprived by the monarch, by accident, or by thieves.[132] When the loss occurs after demand has been made, and the deposit not returned, the depositee is to make it good and to pay a fine of equal value.

67. Whoever of his own accord uses [this description of deposit] shall be fined, and must restore it, together with the profit made.

The same rule applies to things borrowed[133] [for a special occasion], also to what is delivered for the purpose of being restored to the owner,[134] also to what is deposited [in the absence of the head, with the other members of the family],[135] also to the deposits called nikshepa,[136] and the like.[137]

68. Those proper to be witnesses are, religious devotees,[138] they who bestow liberally, the wellborn, they who speak truth, they whose chief aim it is to be virtuous,[139] they who are strait in their conduct, they who have sons, and the wealthy.[140]

69. There should be at least three witnesses, such as observe the rites prescribed by the Sruti and the Smriti, and are of a class, whether mixed or unmixed,[141] corresponding [with that of the person who produces them]: otherwise,[142] any person may be a witness for any person.

72. Even one person,[150] being an intelligent follower of ritual duties,[151] may, with the consent of both parties, be witness [sufficient].

All are admissible[152] as witnesses in cases of rape, theft[153] defamation and personal trespass.[154]

73. The judge shall thus address the witnesses, as they come up to the plaintiff and defendant:

The worlds appointed for criminals, for atrocious criminals;[155]

74. the worlds appointed for incendiaries, for murderers of women and children—all these shall be the portion of him who gives false testimony!

75. Know, that whatever good has been done by thee in a hundred former births, all shall become his whom thou defeatest by falsehood![156]

76. That man who withholds his testimony, the monarch shall compel to pay, on the forty-sixth day, the entire debt, as well as a fine equivalent to a tenth of the amount.

77. The lowminded man who, although he has knowledge (of the facts), declines to give his testimony, is, in sin, on a par with false witnesses; so is he, in his punishment.

78. In case of conflicting testimony, what is stated by the majority (of the witnesses) must be credited; if the numbers be equal, then those of the witnesses who are of distinguished qualities[157] must be credited; if again, these are in contradiction, then the most distinguished shall be credited.[158]

79. That party (to the suit) whose assertion the witnesses have verified, succeeds; that one whose assertion the witnesses have disproved, is defeated.

80. Although proof has been given by witnesses, yet, if others of more distinguished qualities or in number twice as many give opposite testimony, the first witnesses should be held as false ones.

81. As well they who suborn as they who give false testimony are to be severally fined in double the value of the suit:[159] a brahman, in such case, shall be banished.[160]

82. [The witness] who, after he has been addressed[161] [by the judge, yet] being blinded by passion, withholds his testimony,—he shall pay eight times the [ordinary] fine: in case of a brahman, he shall suffer banishment.[162]

83. Should it happen that the testimony of a witness must occasion the death of a person, whatever the cast of the latter,—the witness shall, in such case, speak untruth.[163] For their purification [after giving such false testimony] the twice-born must make oblation to SARASWATI.[164]

84. If any settlement have been mutually come to [between debtor and creditor], a written instrument should be drawn up before witnesses, the first mention being of the creditor.

85. In it should be written the date, viz. year, month, half month, day, also the name, cast, family, the Veda-school, and father's name, of each party, &c.[165]

86. This being completed, the debtor shall subscribe with his signature [a declaration, as follows]:—"What is written above, I, the son of such an one, agree to."

87. Then the witnesses, all being equal in grade, shall, after their fathers' names, write, with their own hands respectively: "I, such an one, am a witness."

88. And the writer shall subscribe at the foot, as follows:—"This has been written, at the request of both parties, by me, such an one, the son of such an one."

89. An instrument, entirely in the handwriting of the party, is to be received as proof, although it be not witnessed, unless procured by violence or by fraud.[166]

90. Payment of a debt incurred upon a writing, is obligatory only upon the debtor, his son, and grand-son;[167] but a pledge shall remain in use so long as the debt is unpaid.

91. If the instrument be in a foreign country, be illegibly written, be destroyed, faded, stolen, mutilated, burned, or torn, [the Court] shall direct a new one to be made.

92. The authenticity of a written instrument which is doubtful, is to be ascertained by [comparison with other] documents in the handwriting of the party &c.,[168] by [enquiry into] the probability of its having been obtained,[169] and [the mode of] its preparation, by [observation of] any marks, by [enquiry of] the relation [in which the parties stand to each other], and how the matter came about.

93. As often as the debtor makes a payment, either he shall write an indorsement to that effect on the document, or the creditor shall give a receipt under his hand.

94. When the debt is paid, [the debtor] shall cause the document to be torn up, or shall have another prepared, viz. of discharge. If the debt was incurred before witnesses, its payment should also be before witnesses.[170]

95. The scales, fire, water, poison, the sacred draught—these are the ordeals for exculpation,[171] in case of grave accusations, if the accuser be prepared to pay a fine.

96. When it is agreed on; one of the parties shall perform [the ordeal], the other be in readiness to pay the fine. Even without a fine, there shall be trial by ordeal in case of treason or great crime.

97. [The accused,] being summoned, shall, after bathing at sunrise and fasting, be made to go through the several ordeals, in presence of the monarch and the brahmans.

98. The scales are [the ordeal] for women, children, aged men, the blind, the lame, brahmans, and those afflicted with disease. Fire or water, or the seven barleycorns' weight of poison are [the ordeal] for a Sudra.

99. For a less value than a thousand panas, one shall not go through the ordeal of the [heated] iron plough-share, of poison, or of the scales: but in case of offence against the monarch or great crime, purifications[172] shall always be gone through.

100. When the accused has been placed in the scales by those who understand the art of weighing, a counter-weight adjusted, and a line drawn, he is then to be taken out [of the scales.]

101. "O scales! made by the gods, of old, the abode of truth: therefore do ye, propitious ones, declare the truth and liberate me from suspicion!

102. If I be an evil-doer, then bear me down, oh mother! If I be pure, carry me upwards!" Thus shall he [who is to go through the ordeal] invoke the scales.

103. The hands [of the accused] shall be inspected when rice has been rubbed in them; after which, seven leaves of the Indian fig tree are to be placed therein [scil. in his hands] and fastened round successively with a thread.

104. "Thou, O fire, dwellest in all created things! O purifier, in testimony of innocence and guilt, do thou, in my hand, make known the truth!"

105. When he [who suffers the ordeal] has thus spoken, let a smooth red hot iron ball, of fifty palas weight, be placed upon both his hands.

106. Carrying this, let him slowly walk across seven circles, of sixteen fingers breadth diameter each, with an interval of the same measure between each.

107. If, having thrown down the fireball, and being [again] rubbed with rice, he [the accused] is unburnt, his purification is accomplished. Should the ball during [the trial] fall down, or should there be any doubt, he is to take [it] again.

108. "By the power of truth, O Varuna,[173] save me!" Thus invoking the water, and grasping the thighs of a man standing in water up to his navel, let him [who goes through this ordeal] submerge himself.

109. An arrow at the same instant shot [from the bow] a swift footed-man shall [run and] fetch: should he, upon his return, see that the body [of the accused] is still submerged, the latter is to be exculpated.

110. "Thou, O poison, Brahma's[174] son, art ordained for truth and right; free me from the accusation, and be to me, by the power of truth, a draught of immortality!"

111. Thus speaking, he shall eat of poison produced by the Sringa tree, of the Himalaya. Whoever is able to digest this without evil effect, shall be declared innocent.

112. Let the judge, adoring terrible deities, and taking of the water in which [their images] have been bathed, adjure it, and cause [the accused] to drink off three times the contents of his palms.

113. He to whom, within fourteen days from this [ordeal], no great calamity happens, either from the monarch or by act of God, shall without doubt be [held] guiltless.

114. A father when making partition [of his property], can divide it among his sons as he pleases; either giving to the eldest the best share or in such wise that all share equally.[175]

115. If he give equal shares, such of his wives as have not received stridhana from their husband or father-in-law shall also equally share.[176]

116. If one have means, and do not desire [to share in the paternal estate], he shall be separated, something trifling being given to him.[177] A distribution by a father in smaller or larger shares, if in accordance with the Sastras, is lawful.[178]

117. After decease of the parents, let the sons make equal division of the property and of the debts.[179] And so the daughters, of what is left of the mother's [stridhana], after [paying] her debts; and, if there be no daughters, the sons or others of the family [being heirs, take it].

118. What has been self-acquired by any one, as an increment, without diminishing the paternal estate, likewise a gift from a friend or a marriage-gift, does not belong to the coheirs.[180]

119. If one have recovered ancestral property which had been purloined, he has not to give it up to the coheirs;[181] nor shall a man share the earnings of science.[182]

120. If however the common property be augmented, equal division is enjoined.[183] In making division among several grandsons, regard should be had to the respective [portions of their deceased] fathers;

121. inasmuch as the ownership of father and son is co-equal in the acquisitions of the grandfather, whether land, any settled income, or moveables.

122. If a son be born of a wife of equal cast, after partition made, he is to share; or a share may be allotted him from the estate as it is, after allowing for income and expenditure.[184]

123. Whatever property may be given by the parents to any child, shall belong to that child. If partition be made after the father's death, the mother shall also have an equal share.[185]

124. Those of the brothers whose ritual ceremonies have not been accomplished, shall have them completed by the others whose ritual is gone through: so in like manner as to the ritual of sisters, [each of the brethren] devoting a fourth part of his share.[186]

125. The sons of a brahman, shall receive, according to their [mother's] cast, four parts, or three, or two, or one: the sons of a kshattriya [in like manner], three, or two, or one: and the sons of a vaisya, two, or one.[187]

126. Whatever, after partition has taken place, may be discovered to have been wrongly appropriated by one of the sharers,[188] shall be equally divided among them all: this is enjoined.

127. A son begotten by one who is without male issue, in obedience to precept,[189] upon another man's wife, becomes by law heir to both, and presents the death-oblations of both.[190]

128. (I) "An aurasa[191] son," is one born of a dharma[192] wife; equal with him is

(II) "A daughter's son."[193]

(III) "A wife's son," is a son begotten by

a relative[194] [of the husband] or by another [duly authorised].

129 (iv) "A son of hidden birth," is one brought forth in private, in the [husband's] dwelling.[195]

(v) "A girl's son," is one born of an unmarried girl;[196] he is considered the son of the maternal grandfather.

130 (vi) "A son of the twice-married," is one born of a woman [by a second marriage], whether she be [at the time of that marriage] a maid or not.[197]

(vii) "A son by gift," is one who is made a gift of, either by his father or his mother.[198]

131 (viii) "A son by purchase," is one sold by his parents.[199]

(ix) "A son made," is a son [born of parents deceased,] selected by any one for himself.

(x) "A self-given son," is one who has given himself [as a son to another.][200]

(xi) "A son with the bride," is one of whom the mother is already pregnant [by another than her husband] when she marries.[201]

132 (xii) "A deserted son," is one adopted upon being forsaken [by his own parents.[202]]

The first in order that there may be, of the sons above described, shall present the oblation cake[203] and take the inheritance.[204]

133. Such is the rule enjoined by me for sons where there is equality of cast. Even the son begotten by a Sudra, on a slave-woman, shall have such share as [the father] may allot.[205]

134. [But if there be no partition till] after the father's death, then the brothers [born in marriage] are to assign him half a share: if there be no brothers nor daughters' sons, he then takes the whole.

135, 136. If a man depart this life without male issue; (i) his wife, (ii) his daughters, (iii) his parents,[206] (iv) his brothers,[207] (v) the sons of brothers,[208] (vi) others of the same gotra,[209] (vii) kindred more remote,[210] (viii) a pupil, (ix) a fellow-student[211]—these succeed to the inheritance; each class upon failure of the one preceding. This rule applies to all the casts.

137. The heirs of a hermit, of a religious ascetic, of a professed brahmachari,[212] are successively, the preceptor, the disciple, and an associate dwelling in the same religious retreat.

138. One reunited[213] shall take the portion of his deceased reunited co-sharer, and shall give it up to a [son, if one be afterwards] born.[214] This is always so with uterine brothers.

139. A reunited half-brother shall take the property; not a [separated] half-brother: but a [uterine brother] whether reunited or not, shall take; this not being so with the half-brother.[215]

140. An impotent, an outcast as well as his son,[216] a cripple, a madman, an idiot, one blind, one incurably diseased, and such like,[217] are to be maintained, but do not share in the inheritance.

141. The aurasa sons of those [disqualified] persons, also their wives' sons,[218] if themselves free from defect,[219] succeed to shares; and their daughters[220] are to be maintained until provided with husbands.

142. [So] their childless wives shall be maintained, if of good conduct; but shall be cast off, if of vicious habits, or of an evil nature.[221]

143. What has been given [to a woman] by her father, her mother, her husband, or her brother, or received by her before the nuptial fire, or on occasion of her husband's marriage with another wife, and such like,[222] is called stridhana.

144. Gifts from her kindred, from the bridegroom [before marriage], also subsequent gifts, descend to her own kindred, should she die without issue.

145. The stridhana of a wife dying without issue, who has been married in one of the four forms of marriage designated brahma &c.,[223] belongs to the husband; if she have issue, then the stridhana goes to her daughters; should she have been married in another form,[224] then her stridhana goes to her parents.[225]

146. Whoso withholds his daughter,[226] after having promised to give her [in marriage], shall be amerced, and shall reimburse all expenses incurred with interest. If she die [after being affianced] he [i. e. the bridegroom] shall receive back what he has given, deduction being made for the expenditure on both sides.

147. A husband need not return to his wife stridhana appropriated by him, during a famine, or in order to perform sacred rites,[227] or when suffering from disease,[227] or when in prison.[227]

148. If he marry another wife, he shall give to the one he has, as a consideration for superseding her, should she not already have received stridhana, what is equivalent [to his gifts on the second marriage]: but, should she have already received stridhana, then, it is declared, [she is entitled to only] half the amount.[228]

149. If the fact of a partition be denied, the matter shall be ascertained by [reference to] relatives, near or remote, witnesses, and writings, also [by enquiry as to] separate possession of messuage and land.[229]

150. When there is a dispute as to boundaries, the neighbours of the [disputed] land, old men and the like,[230] cowherds, cultivators of the soil close to the [disputed] boundary, and all whose business is in forests—[231]

151.—these shall determine the boundaries, as they are indicated by elevated ground, by charcoal [-remnants],[232] by husks,[233] by trees, by a causeway, by ant-hills, by depressions of the soil, by bones, by memorials,[234] and such like.[235]

152. Otherwise,[236] four, eight, or ten neighbours of the same village, wearing a red wreath and red garments, and carrying earth, shall settle the boundary.[237]

153. And if any falsehood be uttered, upon each one [speaking falsely] the monarch shall impose the medium fine.[238]

In the absence of any persons having knowledge of the matter, and of any indicatory signs, the monarch shall mark the boundary.[239]

154. The same rule applies to fruit-gardens, to out-houses, to villages,[240] to wells or tanks, to pleasure-gardens, and to dwellings, as well as to watercourses caused by the rain.[241]

155. If the boundary be broken, or be overstepped,[242] if a field[243] be taken away; the lowest, the highest and the medium fines shall be imposed.[244]

156. [Constructing] a useful dam, if it occasion but slight damage [to individuals], is not to be prevented; nor is a well[245] which takes from another's land, if having an abundant supply of water and not of large extent.

157. If one construct a dam in a field, without notice to the owner thereof, the right to use it, when complete, shall belong to the owner of the field: if the field be without owner, then the user belongs to the monarch.

158. Whoso fails to complete the cultivation of a field which he has partially ploughed, shall be made to pay [to the landowner] the value of the [expected] crop. He[246] shall complete the cultivation by means of another.

159. If a female buffalo spoil corn,[247] [her owner] shall be fined eight mashas,[248] if a cow, the half [of that sum]; if a goat or a sheep, the half of the latter.

160. If, after having grazed, they repose there, the fine shall be double what is above specified.

The same [rule applies] to land kept for pasture. An ass and a camel are [in this respect] the same as a female buffalo.

161. There shall be an indemnity for the owner of the field equal in value to the corn destroyed.[249] The herdsmen shall receive a beating, but the cattle-owner be punished by fine, as before mentioned.

162. No guilt attaches[250] [to the cattle-owner,] if the field[251] be close to the public road, or to the village pasture lands,[252] and he do not intend [the trespass]; if he do intend it, then he incurs punishment as a thief.

163. A bull, cattle permitted to be at large,[253] a cow that has recently calved, estrays,[254] and the like,[255] having no keeper or brought there by accident or by act of the monarch, shall be let go free.[256]

164. The herdsman shall, at the close of the day, give back the cattle, in the same manner[257] as they were delivered to him: if he be in receipt of wages, he shall replace such as have, through his negligence, died or been lost.[258]

165. If loss accrue by fault of the herdsman, he shall be fined thirteen panas and a half, and shall make good the loss to the owner.

166. Pasture-ground shall be allotted for cattle, such as the villagers agree upon, or in proportion to the whole area of land, or as the monarch wills.

A twice-born man may, in every place, appropriate as his own, grass, fuel, and flowers.[259]

167. There shall be a space of one hundred dhanus[260] between a grama,[261] and the [surrounding] fields, of two hundred for a karvata,[261] of four hundred for a nagara.[261]

168. A man may seize any thing, belonging to himself, which another has sold.[262] The purchaser incurs blame, if [he have bought] secretly: and, if [he bought] from a low man,[263] with secrecy, for a small price, and at an unusual hour, he is [to be accounted] a thief.

169. If one obtain property [which he afterwards discovers to have been] lost or stolen, he should cause the taker[264] of it to be secured: should time or the place not permit of this being done, he must himself restore the property [to its owner].

170. Upon his producing the seller, he [the possessor,] is himself cleared: the owner takes the property, the monarch the fine, and the [defrauded] purchaser the value from the seller.

171. [A claim to] property [as] lost,[265] is to be supported by proof of acquisition[266] or of user: [the claimant,] if he fail, shall pay to the monarch one-fifth of the value [of the property] as a fine.

172. Whoever takes [back] from the hand of a stranger what has been stolen or lost [from himself] without informing the monarch, shall pay a fine of ninety six panas.[267]

173. When lost or stolen property has been recovered by customs officers or by the local police, the owner may claim it until one year has elapsed;[268] after that time it goes to the monarch.

174. If it be a single-hoofed animal, the owner shall pay four panas; if a man, five panas; if a buffalo, or a camel, or a cow, two panas; if a goat or a sheep, the fourth part of a pana.[269]

175.[270]Any property, other than women and children, may be given away, if it be no detriment to the family—but not the whole property, where there are children; nor any portion which has been already promised to another.

176. The acceptance [of a gift] should be public, especially of immovable property. Whatever may be lawfully given and is contracted to be given, shall not, after gift, be resumed.

177. The time given for trial [on purchase] of seed, is ten days;[271] of iron, one day; of beasts of burden, five days; of precious stones, seven days; of women,[272] one month; of milch-cows, three days; of men,[272] half a month.

178. By the action of fire, gold is not lessened in quantity: one hundred palas[273] of silver thereby lose two palas; of tin, one hundred palas lose eight; lead and copper, out of one hundred palas, lose five; iron, of one hundred palas, loses ten.[274]

179. One hundred palas of wool or cotton when worked[275] are increased by ten palas; if the thread be of middling fineness, the increase is five palas; if very fine, three palas.

180. In figured textures and in those made of hair, the loss is estimated at one thirtieth part. In a texture of silk or of the bark of trees, there is neither loss nor increase.

181. Whenever loss has been sustained, the artisan shall be imperatively required to pay what competent judges award, after they shall have investigated [circumstances, of] place, of time, of the mode of using [the material], and its quality of strength or lightness.[276]

182. One made a slave by compulsion, and one sold[277] [into slavery] by robbers, are [entitled to be] set free; so also is [a slave] who saves his master's life; also one who [having adopted servitude for a living,] abandons his claim to maintenance; also one enslaved who pays off what is due from him.[278]

183. One who, being a religious mendicant, forsakes that condition, shall be, until death, the monarch's slave. Slavery must be in the order of the casts, not inversely.[279]

184. Though an apprentice have attained a knowledge of his art,[280] he shall [nevertheless] remain in his master's house for the stipulated time, receiving from his master maintenance, and giving up to him his earnings.[281]

185. The monarch shall erect in the city a mansion and shall settle therein brahmans learned in the three Vedas, and endow them, giving them injunction to discharge their duties.[282]

186. They shall diligently practise all observances stipulated for[283] [in the endowment] which do not interfere with their personal duties, also whatever other observances the monarch may enjoin.[284]

187. Whoso appropriates what belongs to the community or violates his engagement [with the community], shall forfeit his property and be banished the realm.[285]

188. The word of those who [are appointed to] superintend the affairs[286] of the community must be obeyed by all [the members]: he who acts in violation thereof shall be amerced in the first [i. e. lowest] fine.[287]

189. Those who have come [from other parts] upon the affairs of the community shall, upon completion of the business, be dismissed by the monarch, with gifts, with honour, and with hospitable entertainment.

190. An emissary upon the business of the community shall deliver up whatever he has received [on their account]: if he fail to deliver voluntarily, he shall be amerced eleven times the value [of what he withholds].

191. They who have direction of the affairs of the community should be such as know their duties,[288] are pure minded, and not covetous; their word for the welfare of the community is to be followed.

192. What has just been enjoined is obligatory in like manner upon communities of craftsmen, of traders, and of pashandas.[289] The monarch should preserve their distinctive character, and make them respectively adhere to their original callings.[290]

193. If one, after receipt of wages, abandon his work, he shall pay double the amount; if [he desert] when he has not received [his wages], he shall pay a sum equal [to his wages].[291]

The implements shall be in charge of the workman.[292]

194. The monarch shall oblige him who gets work done without having previously fixed the rate of hire, to pay a tenth part, [whether] earnings in trade or [in care] of cattle, or [in cultivation] of corn.

195. A master[293] may treat as he thinks right one who disregards time or place, or [so acts that he] prevents profit being earned.[294]

The more that is done, the more shall be given.

196. Where work [contracted for by two] cannot be proceeded with by the two,[295] [the one who has to abandon the work] shall be paid according to what he has performed; but, if practicable, the original contract should be carried out.[296]

197. If goods [when in transport from place to place] be lost, the carrier shall pay their value; except [the loss be] occasioned by the monarch or by act of God. If he [who has contracted to transport goods] cause them not to start on the journey, he shall be made to pay twice the amount of his hire:

198. if he abandon [his charge] when at the outset of the journey, he shall pay [a sum equal to] a seventh part [of the hire]; if, when he has proceeded to some distance, a fourth part; if when half-way, the entire amount of hire. The like [rule is to be observed] where [the hirer] breaks [his contract].

199. If a professed gambler win at play [as much as] one hundred [panas], he shall pay to the keeper of the house one-fifth: others shall pay [the keeper] a tenth of their winnings.

200. The latter,[297] [in consideration of] having [royal] protection, shall pay the portion stipulated to the monarch, shall make over all stakes won to the winner, shall be true of speech, and forbearing.

201. The monarch shall enforce payment of winnings; [that is,] such as are made in a place kept by a licensed gaming-house-master paying the royal dues, among known players, meeting openly; in other cases, not.

202. They who manage suits [arising out of the games], also the witnesses, are to be such persons as those last described.

If any one play with false dice or cheat, the monarch shall have him branded and banished.

203. An overseer of the games should be appointed, who may thus become familiar with [the persons of reputed] thieves.[298]

The like rules apply to wagers at fighting games, whether of men or brutes.[299]

204. If any give abusive words to one deprived of a limb or an organ of sense, or diseased, whether the words be true or untrue, or [in the guise of] ironical praise,—he shall be fined thirteen panas and a half.[300]

205. The monarch shall compel one who uses such insulting language as, "I will go to thy sister" or "to thy mother,"[301] to pay a fine of twenty-five panas.

206. Half [of this fine is to be imposed when the offensive words are] to inferiors, double if to the wives of other men or to superiors. The fine shall be regulated according to the higher or lower cast of the parties.[302]

207. [Thus;] if the offence occurs, [where the parties are] in the ascending line of cast, the fine shall be double or treble [as may be]; if in the descending line, the fine shall be always lessened one half.[303]

208. If injury be threatened to a person's arm, or neck or eyes or thigh, the fine shall be one hundred panas; if to the foot or nose or ear or hand, and the like,[304] half of that [fine].

209. If the threat be by one who has not the power [to carry out his threat], he shall be fined ten panas; [the threatener] who has the power shall be, in addition, compelled to give surety for the safety of the person [threatened].

210. For abuse by imputation of a crime which would entail loss of cast, the middle fine [shall be exacted]; if of a lesser crime, the lowest fine.

211. If the abuse be directed against one conversant with the three Vedas, against the monarch, or against the gods, the highest fine [is incurred]; if against a whole cast or a community, the middle fine; if against a village or the realm, the lowest fine.

212. If a person be beaten without witnesses, the case shall be tried by marks, probabilities and public report; not however without some suspicion that the marks may have been falsely contrived.

213. For [defiling by] touching with ashes, mud, or dust, a fine is fixed of ten panas; for [defiling by] touching with impurities,[305] scil. of the heel or of the saliva, double [that fine]:

214. that is, if the parties be on an equality. If [the offence be] against other men's wives, or against superiors, [then the penalty is] double; if against inferiors, the half. Should [the aggressors] be insane or intoxicated or the like, there shall not be punishment.

215. Should a limb of one not a brahman occasion pain to a brahman, it shall be cut off. If [a weapon] be raised [against one of inferior cast],[306] the lowest fine [is to be paid]; if the weapon be merely handled, then the fine shall be half.[307]

216. But should a hand or a foot be raised, the fine shall be [respectively] ten and twenty panas. People, however, of any [cast, who lift] weapons against their cast-fellows shall pay the middle fine.

217. For pulling a person by the foot, by the hair, by the clothing, or by the hand, the fine is ten panas: for inflicting pain by dragging about or by violent handling of the clothes, and for putting the foot upon a person, [the fine is] a hundred panas.

218. He who beats with a stick or the like, short of effusion of blood, shall pay a fine of thirty-two panas; if blood appear, the fine is double[308]

219. For damaging a hand, a foot, or a tooth, and for cutting the ears or the nose, there is the middle fine: the same for rending open a wound, or for beating a person till he be as one lifeless.

220. For beating [one so that he] cannot stir, or [so that he cannot] eat, or [so that he cannot] speak, for destroying an eye and the like,[309] for breaking a neck, an arm, or a thigh, [there shall be] the middle fine.[310]

221. If several unite in beating one person, the fine shall be double[311] that prescribed; whatever property be taken away in the struggle shall be restored, and, in addition, the double fine [imposed].

222. Whoever causes pain to another [by any such means] shall be made to pay the expense of the cure, as well as the regulated fine for the fray.[312]

223. He who batters, rends, breaks or pulls down a wall, shall be made to pay a fine of five, ten or twenty panas besides the value.

224. He who casts into a dwelling house any thing hurtful or destructive of life, shall be made to pay, for the first a fine of sixteen panas, for the second the middle fine.

225. For injury to the smaller sort of cattle, or for shedding their blood, for lopping one of their horns or the like[313] or one of their limbs, one shall pay a fine of two and a half panas and upwards.

226. For cutting off the male privy member [of such cattle], or slaying [one], the middle fine, as well as the value [of the animal], shall be paid. For the larger cattle in such cases the fine is double.[314]

227. For cutting down branches, or the trunk, or the entire tree,[315] of such as re-produce [after mutilation], [also for similar injuries] to trees which supply food,[316] the fine shall be doubled progressively up from twenty panas:[317]

228. should the trees be growing where there are memorial erections, or in places for disposal of the dead, or on boundary lines, or in holy places, or in a temple, a double fine [shall be levied]; so, for any famous tree.[318]

230. Forcibly taking away [any thing, though it be] public property, is sahasa;[319] the fine for it is double the value [of the property]. [If the crime be,] on denial, [proved,] then, four times the value.

231. He who instigates the commission of sahasa, shall pay a double fine, and four-fold if he instigate by promise of reward.

232. He who rails at a venerable person,[320] or who disobeys such an one, he who maltreats his brother's wife,[321] he who fails to give that which he has promised, he who forces a dwelling-house with a seal upon it,[322]

233. he who does harm to his neighbour, or to his kindred, and such like[323]—each of these shall be fined fifty panas. So is it enjoined.

234. He who, [on the impulse] of his own will [merely], goes to a widow,[324] he who, when there is a cry for help, does not haste [to render it], he who reviles without cause, a chandala[325] who touches one of higher cast,

235. he who, when making an oblation to the gods or to ancestors, feeds Sudras, or pravrajikas,[326] he who swears an improper oath, or who does what he has no title to do,[327]

236. he who emasculates a bull or smaller animal, who embezzles common property, who destroys the embryo of a female slave,

237. and, among fathers and sons, sisters and brothers, husbands and wives, teachers and disciples, if either desert the other, [he or she] not being an outcast—[in these several instances,] the fine is a hundred panas.[328]

238. A washerman who wears another's dress shall be fined three panas; if he sell, let out, pledge, or, when importuned [give it away],[329] ten panas.

239. If, when father and son quarrel, one volunteer to be a witness,[330] the fine is three panas; but, if [on such an occasion] one offer himself as surety,[331] he shall be fined eight-fold.

240. Whoever falsifies scales, or a royal order, or a measure,[332] or a coin,[333] likewise whoever [knowingly] uses them [so falsified], shall be made to pay the highest fine.[334]

241. A tryer of coin who pronounces a false one to be genuine or a genuine one to be false, shall be made to pay the highest fine.

242. One who falsely sets himself up as a physician,[335] shall, [for his malpractice,] if brutes be concerned, pay the first fine—if mankind, the middle fine—but, if royal officers, the highest fine.

243. Whoso imprisons one not deserving of imprisonment,[336] or releases one found worthy of imprisonment or pending his trial,[337] shall pay the highest fine.

244. He who, in measurement, or [use of] the scales, defrauds [to the extent] of an eighth, shall be made to pay a fine of two hundred panas, and thus proportionably for a more or less quantity.

245. He who adulterates[338] medicine, or oily commodities, or salt, or perfumes, or corn, or sugar, or other saleable articles, shall be fined sixteen panas.

246. For making one sort of article to appear to be of another sort, whether it be earthen goods, or skins, or precious stones, or threads, or corn, or wood, or bark of trees, or clothes, a fine [is ordained of] eight-fold the purchase money.

247. For him who changes a covered basket,[339] or who gives in pledge or sells counterfeit drugs in a wrapper,[340] the fines prescribed are,

248. where [the value is] below a pana fifty panas, where [it amounts to] a pana one hundred panas, where to two panas two hundred panas: with increase of value the fine increases.

249. The highest fine is imposed on those who, [although] aware of the rise or fall in prices, combine, to the prejudice of labourers and artists, to create a price [of their own].

250. For traders who combine, by [arbitrarily fixing] an improper price, to impede [the traffic in] any commodity, or to make [an injurious] sale of it,[341] the highest fine is ordained.

251. The price in [transactions of] sale and purchase, daily, is regulated by the monarch;[342] the difference[343] is declared to be the traders' profit.

252. On goods of his own country let a trader clear a profit of five per cent., and ten per cent. on those of another country; provided he make prompt sale of his purchase.

253. [The monarch] is to determine the price, in unison with the wishes of both purchaser and seller; first adding to the cost of the article the expense of bringing it to the market.[344]

254. He who, having received the price of any commodity, fails to deliver it to the buyer, shall be compelled to deliver the article, together with damages [for the detention]; and should the buyer be from foreign parts, then, the foreign profit [shall be added].

255. There may be a re-sale of goods sold, if the original buyer will not receive them. If loss arise from misconduct of the buyer, he shall bear it.

256. Whatever damage may befal goods by [act of] the monarch, or by accident, shall be the loss of the seller,[345] where he has failed to make delivery on demand.

257. If a person re-sell that which has been sold to another, or sell, as sound, a damaged article; [in either case] the fine shall be double the value [of the article sold].

258. A trader who makes a purchase in ignorance of the rise and fall of prices, must not recede from his bargain; if he do, he shall be fined a sixth [of the price].

259. Traders who carry on business jointly, for profit, shall share the profits and losses, either in proportion to the capital [brought in by each], or according to the contract between them.[346]

260. [A joint trader] who occasions loss [to the partnership] by [engaging in] something which his partner has either prohibited or not sanctioned, or by any negligence, shall make it good: if [on the other hand by his personal exertion] he preserve anything [of the partnership property] from loss, he shall have the tenth of it.[347]

261. The monarch, for fixing the prices, should receive a duty of a twentieth.[348]

If an article of which the sale is prohibited, or one fitting for the monarch[349] [to possess], be sold [without the royal license], it shall be forfeited to the Crown.[350]

262. Whoever declares false weight, or avoids the place where custom is levied, shall be made to pay eight-fold; so he who fraudulently buys or sells.[351]

263. A ferryman levying [toll as though for] land-duties, shall be made to pay a fine of ten panas.[352]

The same fine is ordained for omission to send invitations to brahmans of the neighbourhood.[353]

264. On the death of one departed to a foreign country, his male offspring, his maternal kindred, or those more remotely related, shall take the property: in their default, the monarch [succeeds].

265. Let the partners of a man who acts dishonestly exclude him from any share of the profits. Let him who is disabled [to act personally in the partnership business] act by the agency of another. Thus too it is enjoined for [associations of] priests[354] farmers, and craftsmen.

266. Capture of a thief by the officer is warranted by [his possession of] the property stolen, or by traces of him, also by his having been an offender previously, or his being an inmate of a house of ill repute.

267. And others there are who may be arrested on suspicion, viz., such as conceal their caste, name, &c., also those addicted to gambling, to women, and to drinking, and such as have [betrayed themselves by] a parched mouth in speaking, or a stammering voice;

268. those, moreover, who are inquisitive about others' goods and houses, or who put on a disguise, or who expend [lavishly] although they have no [ostensible] income, or who sell things that have been in use.

269. If one arrested on suspicion of theft do not clear himself, he is to be punished as a thief, being first compelled to make good the property stolen.

270. [The monarch] should compel the thief to make restitution of the stolen articles, and subject him to [such of] the different corporeal inflictions [as may be proper]: a brahman [who is a thief] he shall brand and banish the realm.

271. When a murder or theft has occurred, and [the criminal] is not traced beyond the village, blame falls on the village governor; if [he be traced] to the public road, blame falls on the governor of the district; if traced out of the district, the officer charged with pursuit of criminals shall be to blame.

272. The village within whose boundary [the crime is perpetrated] shall pay; or [that village shall pay] to which track [of the criminal] leads; so, if the track lead to a place within a krosh[355] skirting five villages [all shall pay]; so of ten villages.

273. House-breakers,[356] they who steal horses or elephants, murderers by open violence—such shall be impaled.

274. He who purloins [apparel, &c.[357]] shall have a hand cut off; cut-purses,[358] shall have the thumb and fore-finger cut off; for a second offence, a hand and a foot shall be cut off.

275. For theft of goods of trifling, of medium, and of the highest value,[359] the penalty to be inflicted is proportioned to the value of what is stolen. In its determination, place, time, age, and ability, are to be considered.[360]

276. One who knowingly supplies a thief or a murderer with food, shelter, fire, water, counsel, implements, or money, incurs the highest fine.[361]

277. For wounding with weapons, and for causing abortion, the highest fine is ordained; the highest or the lowest for killing a man or a woman.

278. A woman incorrigibly wicked, one who has slain a man, one who has destroyed dams,[362] shall, unless she be in a state of pregnancy, be thrown into [deep] water with a [heavy] stone tied to her.

279. A woman who is a poisoner, or an incendiary, one who has slain her husband, her guru, or her child, shall be put to death by bulls, her ears, hands, nose, and lips being cut off.[363]

280. If a man be slain, and it be not known who did the deed, his sons, kindred, wives, also women who are in habits of illicit intercourse, are to be separately and without delay questioned,—as to, whether any quarrel has occurred,

281. whether the deceased was addicted to women, or fond of what is costly, or seeking gain,[364] also with whom he had gone—or, the people in the neighbourhood of the place where the murder occurred shall be examined, by gentle means.

282. Incendiaries of fields, houses, forests, villages, pasture-grounds or granaries, also one who has intercourse with the wife of the king, are to be burned in a straw-fire.

283. A man is to be apprehended for adultery, if [found] with another man's wife in mutual grasping of hair or with recent love-marks, or when both admit [their fault],

284. or [if the man be found] toying with her girdle, with her breasts, her upper garment, her thigh, or her hair, or conversing with her at an unfitting place or hour, or on the same spot with her.[365]

285. The wife, if [so acting] after express prohibition, shall pay one hundred panas fine; the man, two hundred panas: if both have been expressly prohibited [so demeaning themselves], their punishment shall be the same as for adultery.[366]

286. For adultery with a woman of equal cast, a man incurs the highest fine; with a woman of lower cast, the middle fine; with a woman of higher cast, [the penalty is] death,[367] and the woman is to have her ears, &c.[368] cut off.

287. If one make off with a virgin decked out [for the bridal], he shall pay the highest fine; if she be not so circumstanced, then the lowest fine. Thus it is, if the virgin be of equal cast: if she be of higher cast, [the penalty of] death is ordained.

288. In the case of a virgin consenting and of inferior cast, no offence [is committed]; otherwise, there is a fine.[369] For ravishing her, the man's hand shall be cut off: if the virgin be of the highest cast, [the penalty is] death.

289. Whoso speaks disparagingly of a woman shall forfeit one hundred panas; but, two hundred, one who brings a false charge against [a woman]. Whoso has carnal knowledge of a brute animal shall forfeit one hundred panas; if of a lowest cast woman[370] or of a cow, the middle fine.

290. If a man[371] have carnal intercourse with female slaves or servants, or even with common women, [such slaves, &c.] being kept [by those to whom they belong] secluded,[372] he shall pay a fine of fifty panas.

291. For forcing a female slave,[373] it is written, there shall be a fine of ten panas; if many [men so] attack one slave, each one shall pay twenty-four panas.

292. A public woman who refuses after taking her hire, shall forfeit twice the amount; so, if the man [decline after contracting, yet] he shall pay.

293. Whoso knows a woman unnaturally, or voids his water upon a man, also one who has carnal knowledge of a female mendicant, shall be fined twenty-four panas.

294. [The monarch] shall banish him who goes to a woman of the lowest grade, having branded him with dishonoring emblems: if a Sudra so act, he shall be [classed among] the lowest. Death shall be to the man of lowest grade who goes to a respectable woman.

295. Whoso fabricates a royal grant,[374] be it for much or little, or sets free one who has kidnapped a woman, shall pay the highest fine.

296. One who brings dishonor to a brahman by giving as food what is unfit to be eaten, is amenable to the highest fine; if to a kshattriya, the medium fine; if to a vaisya, the lowest fine; if to Sudra, half the lowest.

297. If one trade with counterfeit gold, or sell tainted meat; three of his members[375] shall be amputated, and he shall pay the highest fine.

298. Damage caused by four-footed animals shall not be borne by their owner, if he have given warning to clear the way: so, with regard to wood, earth, arrows, stones, a man's arm, or any yoked animals.

299. If death be caused by a vehicle through the breaking of the [animal's] nose-bridle, or through breaking of the yoke, or the like, or from its running backwards, the owner is [to be held] blameless.[376]

300. If the owner of biting or horned animals do not, although able, rescue [a person attacked], he shall pay the lowest fine: but, if there was a cry for help, then, double that fine.

301. He who calls an adulterer, 'thief,' shall be made to pay a fine of five hundred panas: whoever releases such an one, being bribed thereto,[377] shall be made to pay eight-fold the amount [of the bribe].[378]

302. Whoso speaks what is offensive to the monarch, or reproaches the monarch, or divulges the monarch's counsel, shall have his tongue excised and be banished.

303. Whoso makes sale of garments [used to wrap] the dead, or strikes his guru, or seats himself on the vehicle or on the seat of the monarch, shall pay the highest fine.

304. Whoso beats out both [a person's] eyes, a bearer of odious tidings to the monarch, also a Sudra holding himself out as a brahman,—[each of these] shall be fined eight hundred panas.

305. Such law suits as have been decided unrighteously shall be re-investigated by the monarch: [in case of reversal of the judgment] the judges and the winning party shall be amerced in double the amount of the fine decreed in the suit.

306. Should one defeated on the contest of his suit represent as though he were not defeated, he shall, when he comes [again to urge his suit, besides] being re-defeated, be fined double.

307. Should the monarch have inflicted any fine unjustly, he shall himself, after making invocation to Varuna,[379] present thirty times the amount [of the fine] to brahmans.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 43: Various terms are used by our author to denote the head of the State (e.g. Raja, Protector of men, Lord of men, &c.) to suit the metre or fancifully. In translation we have thought it better to be uniform.]

[Footnote 44: What is understood by science is explained in the first book sl. 3.]

[Footnote 45: Manu, ch. 8, sl. 9.]

[Footnote 46: The original is, smriti adi (the second word being equivalent to &c.), which the Commentator explains, as translated, law and usage, or custom.]

[Footnote 47: The &c. signifies, description of chattels, with their number, also particulars of place and time. (M.)]

[Footnote 48: The Commentator has enabled us to supply the ellipsis, but he does not fully explain the author's meaning. It would seem, that in those primitive times, it was considered harsh or inexpedient to harass a defendant, or accused person with two legal proceedings, of any sort, at the same time. The sentence will, however, bear the sense, that no stranger or intervener shall be permitted to come in and interrupt the progress of a pending suit.]

[Footnote 49: The Commentator, observing that this prohibition would seem to be implied in the terms of the sixth sloka, explains (on the authority of Narada) that the latter refers only to the general object of the suit, e.g., that if his verbal complaint be of a loan of money, his recorded complaint shall not be of a loan of apparel—but that this clause, in the ninth sloka, ensures further uniformity in the description of the grievance and character of the suit, e.g., where one has originally complained of retention of 100 pieces of money lent, he shall not vary his complaint to a forcible taking of 100 pieces.]

[Footnote 50: These are expressed by one word, kalaha: but the Commentator notes its comprehensive character, as we have translated it. See the analogous passage in Manu, ch. 8, sl. 6, where an equally ambiguous word parushya is similarly explained in the text itself. The term rendered "slander" by Sir Wm. Jones is simply, reviling or verbal abuse.]

[Footnote 51: sahasa, explained by the Commentator, assault by means of poison, or any instrument destructive of life. The word has another and more particular signification, as infra sl. 230.]

[Footnote 54: We have followed the Commentator in rendering these terms, which are very general and indefinite.]

[Footnote 55: i. e. restlessly before the Court.]

[Footnote 56: Manu ch. 8, sl. 25, 26.]

[Footnote 57: ibid, sl. 55, 56.]

[Footnote 58: Literally "put down," i. e. taken for granted, all question of it disposed of. See next note.]

[Footnote 59: This sloka is by no means unambiguous: but it is satisfactorily explained by the Commentator, who says: "What course is to be adopted where two parties simultaneously present themselves to the Court and tender proofs? e.g. A man acquired a field by gift, and, having for some time possessed it, departed with his family to another country: then, another person obtained a gift of the same field, and, having possessed it awhile, was likewise obliged to go to another country. Both parties return at the same time, claim the same field, and resort to a Court of law. Then arises the question,—whose proofs shall be taken? Yajnavalkya says (ut supra sl. 17); that is to say, where one sets up an older title, saying—I was possessed of this field at such a date—his witnesses are the first to be examined; but should the other party urge—True, the field was acquired and enjoyed by him at the first, but the king bought it of him and granted it to me—or—Another got the field and gave it to me; in that case, as the proofs of him who has the older title are of no consequence, and thus he is disposed of, the witnesses of the other claimant are to be examined. It is incorrect [to read the sloka as asserting] that, where there is a denial [of a claim] the witnesses of the plaintiff shall be examined, and where a former judgment or something as a ground of defence is set up, in [either of] which cases the original claim is met, then the witnesses of the defendant shall be heard; inasmuch as all this is included in the rule,—(here the Commentator quotes the 7th sloka of the text). This view is clearly supported by Narada, viz. On a denial, proof is upon the plaintiff; where some ground of defence is stated, upon the defendant; upon an allegation of prior decree, the decree shall be the proof.—After this Narada proceeds:—When there are two claimants, if there be witnesses, the witnesses of the prior claimant shall be [first examined]—So we perceive, this [description of] law-suit is distinguished from all others." These quotations favor the supposition, that the science of special-pleading is not of European origin, and is traceable to a remote antiquity.]

[Footnote 60: Supra sl. 11.]

[Footnote 61: e.g. that the defendant has got possession of gold and silver and apparel, &c. (M.)]

[Footnote 62: Supra, sl. 6. The Commentator excludes from the operation of the harsh rule in this 20th sloka, an heir, who is supposed to deny his ancestor's debt or liability through ignorance; but he attempts to justify the rule itself by experience of human conduct.]

[Footnote 63: This Sastra teaches a system or science of ethics such as moralists now-a-days designate as Machiavellian or jesuitical; in which right or wrong have a relative but little intrinsic meaning.