Please discuss the Motorcycle.com article 2012 Victory Hard-Ball Review [Video] in our Motorcycle Forums below. Use the reply button to let others know your comments or feedback on the article. Constructive criticism is always appreciated, along with your thoughts and personal opinions on the bikes and products we have tested.

Thanks for the well done review and video tour! I agree with most of the points given but I don't know if I would beat up the Hardball too much for not being able to fit a "open faced" helmet in the saddlebags. I don't think I can recall any current cruisers on the market that can boast such a feat either without the addition of a trunk case. I think that's why half helmets have remained so popular with many cruiser riders.

Thanks for the well done review and video tour! I agree with most of the points given but I don't know if I would beat up the Hardball too much for not being able to fit a "open faced" helmet in the saddlebags. I don't think I can recall any current cruisers on the market that can boast such a feat either without the addition of a trunk case. I think that's why half helmets have remained so popular with many cruiser riders.

Thank you, Matt. The saddlebag width isn't a deal breaker, but Victory had an opportunity to make a better saddlebag. If other manufacturers were jumping off a bridge... Get what I mean? A quarter-inch more width and an open-face helmet would fit. You can't tell me a quarter-inch would destroy the bike's styling, therefore, it was a failure on Victory's part not to create a better design.

Thank you, Matt. The saddlebag width isn't a deal breaker, but Victory had an opportunity to make a better saddlebag. If other manufacturers were jumping off a bridge... Get what I mean? A quarter-inch more width and an open-face helmet would fit. You can't tell me a quarter-inch would destroy the bike's styling, therefore, it was a failure on Victory's part not to create a better design.