The point is that it's artificial scarcity. Besides that, strange things happen in math when you introduce irrational numbers into equations. Such as divide by 0, or infinite divisibility.
A math error such as that would be a flaw,therefore easy to demostrate a need to correct in the community,
bitcoin had flaws in the past which were corrected, and the new software containing the correction was adopted quickly across the board
My comment about math was pointing out that math is not the immutable truth. This is a claim that I have heard in regards to bitcoin, which my comment below mentions. "Math doesn't lie". This is just not true. The system of math and numbers that humans have interpreted is not a flawless interpretation. There are proofs that .99999... = 1 and proofs that 1 = 2 etc. Computer systems are finite systems. Number systems are not. We create symbols to represent irrational numbers. Computers use symbols to calculate. Not to belabor the point too much, but even theoretical physics is not trust worthy thanks to our inability to even understand what we call irrational numbers much less codify them in a way that generates reliable and repeatable outcomes. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle with its mathematical proofs is a perfect example of this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7UNvDN_EZo
Not saying that has happened in btc, yet, but there are lots of common misconceptions about math. People say math doesn't lie, yeah it does. People also say there would be no rational reason for the artificial limit of 21 million to be changed, yeah there is.
You just say the 21 million change would have a reason but don't give on

Well, truth be told, the votes were bought by special interests through media, social media trolls and aligned party members that turned their back. That was where the real money was spent. There's nothing "trickle down" in politics.

1. Prior to the smear campaign which included establishment parties, both R and D, and media how much did he lead by? Weak candidate?
2. YUP.
3. YUP.
4.YUP.
5. Yup. They outspent him what..15-1?
6. Always possible.
He would have won hands down until the sexual molestation accusations and the subsequent bolt. He wasn't a weak candidate. He was the strongest. Until the left and right establishment, along with the media, brought DOOM.

The point is that it's artificial scarcity. Besides that, strange things happen in math when you introduce irrational numbers into equations. Such as divide by 0, or infinite divisibility.
Not saying that has happened in btc, yet, but there are lots of common misconceptions about math. People say math doesn't lie, yeah it does. People also say there would be no rational reason for the artificial limit of 21 million to be changed, yeah there is.
Also another misconception I hear a lot of, that somehow there is this vast I guess democratic network of network users to download the new software. You just need 51% of the miners to do it. And really not even 51% of the people, just 51% that control the hash power.
What would be the equivalent of Jekyll Island in bitcoin? My guess is somewhere in Asia.
Overheard the Janitor at my 40 story office building talking to one of the window washers on the way down the elevator at lunch the other day. Talking about how he bought in at coinbase a couple weeks back and that he has quadrupled his investment.

So one Authoritarian government spends less that some other Authoritarian government,, and you think it is superior to limited government with little authority.
I don't think so,, and I question your priorities.

Polls closed. Time to see the results.
BTW, Alabama’s state Supreme Court late Monday stayed a judge’s earlier order that the state preserve digital voting records in Tuesday’s election. So is it winner take all? No recount?

Basic Information

About TomtheTinker

Political Campaign Skills

Campaign Workers:

Fund Raiser, Phone Bank Worker

Entertainers and Events:

Security

Signature

"The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." —Jeff Cooper

Out of suffering have emerged the strongest souls; the most massive characters are seared with scars.