Meta

Quote note (#280)

Bacteria are often invoked as agents of ‘rhizomatic’ (horizontal) disruption of tree-like genetic lineages, so it’s intriguing to see them being proposed (p. 161-2) as cladistic engineers:

If two groups of the same insect ignore each other and only mate with their social circles, they should eventually split into distinct species. These splits occur all the time in nature, and the forces that cause them can take many forms. They could be physical obstacles like mountains or rivers. They could be differences in timing, in the hours or season in which animals are active. They could be incompatible genes that prevent two animals from interbreeding. Anything that stops animals from mating, or that kills or weakens the offspring of those couplings, can create ‘reproductive isolation’ — a gulf that drives species apart. And as [Eugene] Rosenberg had shown, bacteria can cause reproductive isolation, too. By acting as a living barrier that stops two populations from meeting up, microbes could potentially drive the origin of new species. …

“Although common among bacteria, lateral gene transfer—the movement of genes between distantly related organisms—is thought to occur only rarely between bacteria and multicellular eukaryotes. However, the presence of endosymbionts, such as Wolbachia pipientis, within some eukaryotic germlines may facilitate bacterial gene transfers to eukaryotic host genomes. We therefore examined host genomes for evidence of gene transfer events from Wolbachia bacteria to their hosts. We found and confirmed transfers into the genomes of four insect and four nematode species that range from nearly the entire Wolbachia genome (>1 megabase) to short (<500 base pairs) insertions. Potential Wolbachia-to-host transfers were also detected computationally in three additional sequenced insect genomes. We also show that some of these inserted Wolbachia genes are transcribed within eukaryotic cells lacking endosymbionts. Therefore, heritable lateral gene transfer occurs into eukaryotic hosts from their prokaryote symbionts, potentially providing a mechanism for acquisition of new genes and functions."

This may not be of any import to anyone, though I simply feel like sharing a piece of my journey. I have, in the past few days, come to fully move from the alt-right perspective, to embracing neoreaction. I would say that the major characteristic of this shift, was a move from the “white identity politics” which the alt-right is so predisposed toward, and preoccupied by, to carefully recognizing the best possible future.

This said, what I am struck by is that many of the alt-right ideas actually hold steady. Yet their analysis of how to reach their vision is completely off, and they are indeed too invested in white nationalist beliefs. I was one of them, so I do have something of an understanding. I reject the current model of multiculturalism with an even greater disgust than I had before embracing neoreaction, primarily because I am that much nearer to multiculturalism now. I do believe personally in a future which is united genetically through the races, and oriented toward a unification of the human species. I understand it in terms of neoreactionary concepts now, as opposed to the “national socialist” dogma which the alt-right casually and – for the most part – blindly spreads. I had never really given it much consideration at all while browsing those areas, and now I must say I feel that the model of patchwork and neocameralism (as far as I understand it) is far superior, and that I do rather embrace the idea of techno-monarchy as well.

That said, I actually now believe that many of the things that the “alt-right” is so adamant over, such as “race mixing” and the like, are actually valid concerns. I laughed at them for a long time, even going so far as to ignore them. Yet here I am, and I must say that despite my full embrace of something different from mere white identity, I remain equally if not more disgusted by the multicultural model that we find in places like Portland. I used to laugh at people who grew angry about race mixing, seeing them as pathetic white people who are preoccupied. Yet now that I have come to consider the model here, basically I now feel even more confident in the future of genetics and society, and thus view the current model of multiculturalism as that much more horrid. For that reason, now I do see that adamance over “race mixing” as being born of the right ideas, simply pointed in the wrong direction.

It is clear that we are living in a time of hedonism and decadence. These things are at best tools to be used by those with virtue on rare occasion. Yet what we see is that they have turned into something more than even a “way of life” – no, they have become an entire ideology and even a sort of hidden religious belief. Our entire political system is based around the maximization of the most primitive psychological and emotion-based comforts the human being can really experience, and the ceaseless exponential deepening of those mental connections. When we actually look at where the majority of the bastardized progressivism comes from, we will always find either nearby or at the center, a rainbow flag hanging up on the wall. These are the symbols of liberalism today, and the rainbow flag in and of itself is a symbol of the current “hedonistic” model for multiculturalism: do not confront taboos, do not challenge the primitive pleasure of comfortable and simplistic models of cohesion, put on a dress and dance the night away because you’re special, dude! I must say I have no problem with “homosexuality” as a biological predisposition. Yet I do feel that it is the root of the general model that our society follows, and from those enclaves flow the entire Cathedral, and its most powerful backers. They, like us, stay in the shadows and have their terminology. Queer theory, and much worse than this…

Before you dismiss what I am arguing, I will now remind you of the reason I brought that up: neoreaction. What are the main impediments to neoreaction? Yes, this question is, on a philosophical basis, incompatible with pure neoreaction. I have absolutely no disagreement there. I simply want to look at the political spectrum as more of an observation perhaps, then to consider the idea in and of itself. I do not fully understand the idea, and cannot claim that I do. I never will. Yet I do believe that I have an understanding of culture and society, and I do believe that neoreactionary ideas and concepts can come to be represented politically and culturally. Not dogmatically, yet I do believe that such a consideration is worthwhile. So what is the main opposition… well, there are places like the Southern Poverty Law Center, yes. But when you think of the most dangerous “enemy territory,” where do you think? A meeting between German and Chinese geneticists? Probably not. What about a cafe in your local hipster neighborhood? Or worse, a cafe in a wealthy, hip* (more on this word later) neighborhood in Portland, Oregon? I merely wish to draw attention to the fact that at each of these cafes there is, somewhere close by, a rainbow flag patriotically hanging down (WOAH, that sounded super GOP-conservative-dumb didn’t it, I know, just follow through with me for a sec). This is the “symbol” the Cathedral gathers around now. It is the closest thing they have to a symbol of national pride. I’m not sure what you would call it. I merely mean to say that for these groups, they pledge allegiance to this flag in much the same way that the average American would pledge allegiance to the American flag in many years past. It is the thing which they place the most stock in, and it is born of hedonism and decadence, not truth (let me posit my argument why). And as such, I believe that this flag and what it is most directly tied to, is also related to and of these things. I believe that it may well be a fact that this battle, the battle against “cultural queerness” was one of the most vital battles that neoreaction and any right wing movement had to fight, and this battle was foolishly lost due to being fought poorly, and by people who had no understanding of the outcome that would result: a deepening and frightfully bastardized ideological religiosity surrounding a horrid model of multiculturalism fostered due to community hedonism and a hedonistic desire for comfort and cohesion over truth, morality, and rationality.

Today the rainbow flag represents the entire false project of the Cathedral, and liberalism in general. It represents false multiculturalism. And it also represents the moment when our entire species collectively decided that it was preferable to quietly embrace and excuse decadence and turn a blind eye to morality because “ah, what does it hurt.” This is the definition of what decadence is: “Ah, what does it hurt anyway.” That’s what decadence really is. It is the moment when you decide to embrace and accept something of very, very low moral significance, but which is as a matter of fact generally immoral, or wrong, because you believe that your comfort in not having to deal with standing up for the minor truth that is right, is worth more to you than standing up for that supposedly minor right. Yet look at what that “minor” right develops into. It’s not as though homosexuality is bad, per say. Not like how killing homosexuals is bad. That’s evil, as is obvious (note: the last sentence or two probably will leave a negative emotional/psychic imprint on the less capable). Homosexuality is the most delicate, faint of immoralities. It is the most subtle. And, arguably, it is the most minor wrong a person can possibly commit. Yet the moment when society collectively decides “eh, what the heck, who cares…” is the moment when that society has officially entered into decadence, and it is also the moment at which that society signs its own death note.

Some of these arguments are only decent at best, yet I do want to reiterate the purpose we are thinking about this: because the rainbow flag is a unifying symbol for the Cathedral, and these are the things which bore it. And it has come to present a representation of a whole swath of the ideas behind the Cathedral. As such, it is the national symbol of the Cathedral. It is their most powerful religious symbol. It carries the most emotion and weight behind it: to burn a rainbow flag would be interpreted with all the emotional psychic import of the Holocaust, the KKK, “Adagio for Strings” on PBS over images of concentration camps, etc. Ignoring that for now, let me just say that this flag represents everything which the Cathedral believes. Make of this information what you will.

Now, hear this: behind the rainbow flag lies an institutional and economic power which gives it its “depth.” When we think about the rainbow flag, we believe it is merely flying as a sort of abstract symbol for the cafes and the Hip people who go there. Yet really, the flag is supported by an institutional and political/economic infrastructure as deep as any nation. Start first with the Southern Poverty Law Center. Look at groups like this and the money that goes into them. Look at human rights institutions. I won’t claim to know much. I merely say this to draw attention to the fact that these powerful institutions back the rainbow flag with money and legitimacy, as well as sheer power. Therefor we can also conceptualize the flag as the national symbol of these humanist institutions. The closer we look, the more we will find that behind the Cathedral lies the idea of “eugenics.” The institutions behind the rainbow flag all work in absolute opposition to the “Terrors of Nazi Germany,” and hence, the terrors of genetic information with regard to the human species. They are, above all else, in opposition to these questions. Behind all the KKK, Holocaust, etc emotionality, there lies the fundamental belief that genetics and “eugenics” are evil and must be fought. This is the baseline difference. Food for thought.

This is the deepest claim to power these institutions hold: the power over the emotive authority of eugenics… the image of the campers, the music. PBS. NPR. The National History Museum. These are the most powerfully entrenched and deep aspects of the apparatus, deeper even than the rainbow flag and the Southern Poverty Law Center… they represent the bedrock beneath it all… the old money… and therefor the structure of the thought that could birth something like the SPLC and give it such authority for so long, and then the flag… it is from these old, wealthy powers that rises the Cathedral.

The argument is pretty simple….Preserving western civilization is the ultimate objective of both Alt-right and NRX. White europeans created it and are the only group that shows any interest in preserving it, hence their preservation is essential. This point is backed up by the fact that all behavior is at least 50% genetic, while intelligence is at least 70%, and possibly as much as 90% genetic….There’s your culture….So the Magic Dirt argument is nonsense, it’s the people……

I assume that´s the boden part of blut & boden. Yeah, it´s mumbo, altho within a certain time-frame the modifications caused by the climate will be observable, it´s ca. always trumped by blood. (And that´s leaving out terraforming.)

In Plato the heart of the noble lie is that the people are rooted in the dirt, in the land, as it instills a sense of community, one which only Nationalism can provide; without this its sacking and infiltration by barbarians is inevitable. Notice that it’s called the “noble” lie, or alternatively the pia fraus, the *pious* fraud. So it’s nonsense but it’s noble, pious nonsense. Heidegger in various of his Hölderlin lectures carries on this Platonic tradition. Bodenständigkeit is perhaps *the* ultimate negation of Full Communism.

Surely you put the blood above the soil? Platón also says that there is nothing which one should more anxiously guard than one´s blood.

But yes, the soil myth is fine to make the people in some areas guarantee the territory.

Dick Wagner Reply:September 5th, 2016 at 7:42 pm

I don’t care about blood, frankly. I care about culture. A racist technicality you and I seem to differ on is the Arab problem for instance. I think if we took their Koran from them and brainwashed, I mean re-educated, them with some good wholesome Western ideology immigration wouldn’t be so bad. Look at Alfarabi, Avicenna, Al Ghazali, and Averroes – with their genes they reached heights that 99.9999% of Aryans never reached. This is evidence that they have merely been bluepilled, temporarily, by a false prophecy. Negroids on the other hand, you’d be hard-pressed to name one exemplary mind that’s come out of that jungle-woodwork. Granted I would rather spend my time with Nietzschean niggers than dogmatic cowards of pure Icelandic stock.

So why does Platón proscribe blood guardianship, as does the Germanic Völuspá and the Indian system when they actually had a high culture there?

Dick Wagner Reply:September 5th, 2016 at 7:58 pm

You’re going to have to direct me to the dialogue and stephanus numbers because I can’t recall him ever speaking of blood. Greekness yes, but it sounds like you’re imposing on him a modern schema. Aristotle’s advice to Alexander the Great comes to mind: “Treat Greeks as friends, but barbarians [non-Greeks] as animals.” But whether this is a question of blood or culture is difficult to tell; likely, they would be impossible to tease apart. The Ancient Greeks weren’t racist, they were languageist. If you couldn’t speak Greek you were a nigger, a barbarian. The etymology of barbarian is instructive here.

‘And God proclaims as a first principle to the rulers, and above all else, that there is nothing which they should so anxiously guard, or of which they are to be such good guardians, as of the purity of the race. They should ob- serve what elements mingle in their offspring…http://history.hanover.edu/courses/excerpts/211plat2.html

Ancient Greeks were racist. I have bucketloads of evidential things.

Dick Wagner Reply:September 5th, 2016 at 8:12 pm

That’s taken out of context. That is speaking of a hierarchy within the Greeks themselves, not of the hierarchy between Greeks and non-Greeks. Gold-souled Greeks shouldn’t breed with bronze-souled Greeks, etc. In Plato’s late work, the Laws, you get lots of the Schmitt-esque friend/enemy themed discourse, though it’s present in the Republic by way of the silver-caste of guard dogs that love their own and hate the other. What’s blood got to do, got to do with it?

Race properly is intra-Greek also. Race is a matter of endless depth. You apparently are used to it from the horizontal White Nationalist discourse, but majority have a wrong conception of it. “White race” is a recent concept, from the 17th century. And even then and even now pigmentation is not the most important factor, but you will get WN and now Alt-R rhetoric which portrays it as if it is.

A beautiful family is of a good race. Both intelligence and looks are heritable. You can say about anything that it´s “taken out of context.”

Dick Wagner Reply:September 5th, 2016 at 8:33 pm

You will write this off because this is how it always happens but I’m having deja vu, like we’ve done this before. How do you reconcile the importance you attach to blood with your belief in reincarnation? Plato isn’t talking about blood: he was largely reacting against the naturalistic, physiological weltanschauung of the pre-Socratics (post-Homerics); so he would’ve found that vulgar. He was talking about Souls. Further, it would be tricky to count Plato as a racist (maybe there’s an argument for the hoi polloi that surrounded him) as he borrowed and radicalized religions and philosophies of neighboring browns, the Egyptians and Indus Valley civilizations namely.

The proper (false) dichotomy is the Over-Soul created blood in His own image. Over-Soul, Soul, blood, then soil is the order of rank. The Over-Soul created hierarchical gradients of blood/soil compatibilities.

To what extent can the Euro-Soul, as the closest resemblance of the Over-Soul, be infused into the lower souls? That is the question, the experiment of Full Communism.

It won´t be widely readily admitted but it´s a fact. Alt-R is also a subculture, or includes subcultures at least. Like Rock music is a subculture, where new ‘rockers’ come in every generation. It has the Para-Nietzscheans (many of which tend to quite ruin a thoroughbred´s association with the term ‘Nietzschean’), Neo-Romantics, Neo-Nazis, Neo-Christians, White Nationalists, etc. Sort of like Hip-Hop includes the Juggalos, and Rock music the Beat Generation, the Mods, Skinheads, Teddy Boys, etc.

It´s nothing to be ashamed of really, all human groups are subcultures.

But for us who don´t identify strongly with any single one, it can be amusing to observe.

This is not bad because subcultures tend to survive quite long. Jazz is nearing a 100 years. Classical music, centuries.

It´s what much of it pretends to believe. Like people pretend to be Christians, but actually just believe in some bastardized image that they have of Jeezuuus. Like a meme from 8chan that has become a third-grade version of itself on 9gag. Like people who start liking music because it´s popular, almost for no other reason. Like in the 70´s, guys growing long hair because it became a trend (even if they hated it, they wanna fit in).

When the so-called Roman so-called Catholic Church (I say so-called, because these words have other meanings*) became a big institution, it obviously attracted what the author of Catcher in the Rye referred to as phonies who just came their for the gold & buttfucks.

*’Church’ e.g. is from Greek kyrios meaning ‘Lord’.

If all of the Cathedral like really believed in that true diversity, in liberty & justice for all, etc. It wouldn´t be importing so many antithetical Third Worlders to fuck it up.

The asuric pretends to be good more often than it admits to be evil.

Some types of it do not even know they are evil.

Evil is like Mao´s cultural Revolution.

It´s supposed to, you know, make people more just and honest. But its really mostly grievance & ressentiment made politics & action, actually not causing more justness and a fairer society.

The Red flag of Communism is the Cathedral´s true flag.

The Cathedral is anti-capitalism.

It´s anti-fair.

We know this and we shouldn´t grant it the grace to hold the mantle of the good, nor even of capitalism (which is good, trading goods and all).

Trolling might work to get attention for the Alt-R in the media, but here it will only make you seem a sub-human from the orcish hordes.

michael Reply:September 5th, 2016 at 3:02 am

the fag flag is not about hedonism its about exit, the cathedral is what exit looks like without culture, its a bunch of kids on some star trek episode or lord of the flies culture. Yeah sure hedonism was part of it but more for the annoying the straights than the hedonism. we grew our hair [our freedom flag] not to fit in but to stand out.But exit as a march through the institutions and a parallel subculture was still possible then. apartments in nyc were 100 month, falafels 2 for a $1 and pussy was free. its was televised commoditized and put on endless replay so every 20 something since has thought they too were part of the glorious revolution.But they are the man now except they have to dig really deep usually into fiction land to find windmills to tilt against.And their street theatre has ossified into rituals, so it cant be freedom it has to be equality.yeah sure alt right as its now thought of is the sophisticates of the WNs but thats new. reaction wants to avoid the event horizon, exit velocity not going to happen that line was crossed about 1980. HBD is.democracy may even be HBD for us. race is hbd for all one way to break out is use altright as a swing arm. this is not the right strain though this is a cathedralis strain its central planning without culture, race denial,and elitist

I think it´s pretty obvious by now that Mr. Faggot Wagner had one shit of a father. He thinks almost everything is about a grandstand “calling it.” Rather than actually being close to what good philosophers have called Logos, and by that I mean accurately describing actual real world-as-it-is things.

Leaf Erikson thinks he got to the bottom of the rabbit hole but that’s only because all he could do was smash his skull against it without breaking through. There are carpets on which coarse feet cannot tread.

No, actually it´s more Nietzschean because that Nationalist anti-Semite lost.

Dick Wagner Reply:September 5th, 2016 at 3:42 am

His Good Europeanism and philo-semitism were in the service of Hierarchy, not the other way around. If he knew most of Europe and especially Jews were going to side with Marx instead I doubt he would have voiced such *exoteric* views.

I don´t necessarily disagree, but the Nazi phenomenon is extremely documented so if you know meta-political analytics, if you know heuristics, learned from comparing different civilizations, mythologies, political ideas, etc, from looking at human history since its dawn to the now, and looking at biology, animal group behavior, what have you, then the Nazi phenomenon becomes quite readable to one.

It´s not that their goals were wrong, but that their methods were. “The end justifies the means” is Leftism.

The actual 5.000+ year working & operating aryan method is: the means are the end (in themselves).

Dick Wagner Reply:September 5th, 2016 at 7:32 pm

“The actual 5.000+ year working & operating aryan method is: the means are the end (in themselves).” You’ve obviously never read Tacitus’ Germania where it is documented that the Germans, like thug niggers, don’t value something unless it has been obtained by pillage.

All the other avenues of documentation you cite are SUBORDINATE to the fact that the victors write history, Cathedralist apologist.

You make these judgement, all the time. That´s what you do. Like a 8th grader, does. You very seldomly provide a honest argumentation.

You can believe in whatever the hell, it will make you look edgy to a lot of people. You can believe in super-races, in terrorist nihilist chic. In whatever. These things do not make you actually know how things actually happened on this planet nor how things (e.g. systems) actually work.

you know Im a pain in lands side critiquing reaction as a dissident reactionary, possibly now considered alt right by some perspective. maybe Many would prefer me gone and maybe ill take the hint eventually but I am at least commenting on the topic at hand though I may occasionally put a link to something of general reactionary interest.

But you seem to deliberately post right past admins topic, often with dozens of nonsensical free associations [yeah im sure they have some occult significance to you but frankly the rest of us cant be bothered -youre not william blake] and in the process you get into half a dozen obscure comment wars with a crew that like yourself seems to have just shown up here a month ago. what is your purpose here. Because what it looks like is instead of starting your own blog youre just using this one.

You wouldn´t know if I´m William Blake if I was flying over your dying body.

It was Mr. Illegal who started the Alt-R subthread here, which I replied to.

You´re the biggest troll this site has ever had. You cheap monkey, now you´re just playing a status game because of where the wind is blowing.

“Hey, I´ve been receiving some flak lately for my WN & anti-NRx rhetoric, but maybe here´s an opportunity for making it look like I´m a bit vindicated by pointing out …”

> instead of starting your own blog

Funny, this is exactly what admin suggested to you.

Kwisatz Haderach was so amicable to put light on your rhetoric yesterday, which you seem to have ignored. Putting it instead “I´m a thorn in admins site, hehe, but I don´t care I´ll just keep on repeating myself endlessly without integrating what the other commentators are logically showing.”

Since repetitiveness is your thing to such a degree; Mr. Haderach´s fine delineation is here:

To start off, you’ve written many comments here bashing IQ and those here who you see as fixated on IQ. It’s surprising to me that you now are using IQ to explain Belarus, but I understand the temptation, since IQ really is an extremely powerful explanatory tool.

But to restate the argument – Belarusians have extremely white skin, do not subscribe to cultural marxism, and have a lot of nationalistic feeling, but their country isn’t a nice place to live. You and I agree that IQ has something to do with that. How much? Their national IQ is estimated to be 97 by Lynn, who as far as I know the only one who’s attempted to compile statistics that are validly comparable across nations. (Conducting original research to establish valid norms for different national aptitude tests, etc). 97. Think about that. US Whites are closer to 101 by his estimates. The average difference in IQ between US whites and Belarusian whites is 4 points. This is as large of a difference as the difference between US Whites and Han Chinese (4 points). It is approximately as large as the difference between Chinese and Jews (4 points).

However, I think there is a lot more going on beyond IQ here. Belarus is east of the Hajnal line. I think this makes a decisive difference. Belarus did not live under the system of bipartite manorialism that characterized Western Europe throughout the middle ages. [https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/tag/bipartite-manorialism], [https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2016/03/02/family-types-in-eastern-europe-1500-1900/]. I think hbd chick’s theory of population viscosity might be necessary here.

I’m not going to rise to the bait with respect to your last sentence. Suffice it to say that I think your theory of “smart people -> crazy ideas -> self annihilation” is really bad. It is not the greatest minds of Christendom that have voted for white genocide. It is not the greatest minds of Germany that form Angela Merkel’s base of support. It is in the feels-n-signalling demo of the average German soccer mom and boring nice guy dad who voted Merkel into power. Meanwhile, many of the western world’s smartest people are hard at work combating the white genocide of the soccer mom crowd. If you want somebody to blame, start at the median voter. It’s demoralizing and counterproductive to wail on high IQ people for not having already solved the problem. “Hurry up and fix it, Poindexter! You suck! Fight or die little man! Niggers! Niggers! Niggers!”. It’s dumb, michael. Why are you doing it? What kind of reaction are you hoping to get? You’re really lowering the tone and there’s no compensatory anything coming out of your posts these days. You’re just short-circuiting into a kind of racially-oriented Tourette’s syndrome. You are not striking an image of a battle-ready lieutenant. If it ever does come to war, a better man that you will be my leader.

Dick Wagner Reply:September 6th, 2016 at 1:34 am

“youre not william blake” hahahahahahaha

You’re not not a fascist either, as soon as someone crosses you Mr. Hyde straps on those jackboots. “if I was flying over your dying body”

You should stay out of my discussions with others. And we are not discussing my critiques of MM. we are discussing the hundred post jabberwocky, the multiple identities, the comment wars that go one for page after page for weeks, and its complete irrelevance. Get mad Im pointing out its something I have never seen in years on here that I have noticed the population of commenters drop off a cliff since you started doing it.You seem like youre perhaps unaware. I suppose you will have the last word though you have said too much but thats my two cents Im not going to reply and ask that you not respond to anymore of my comments

To quote the part most directed at you: All I’ve ever heard is chanting. It’s like a dog barking at a motor-car, pretending that if it wasn’t on the leash it would sort that piece of tin out good. Even more absurdly, NRx gets treated as if it was the leash. “Let us off! Woof, woof! Why are you holding us back?” We’re not holding anyone back, nor could we — go for it. Chase the car. No one’s stopping you.
[End of quote.]

here are two factions circling the layers of the #NRx: the Pseudos and the Aristos. the Pseudos are using this as a Fashy-Flashy Popularity contest, or to slander those who they (‘secretly’) feel inferior to. #scenes

some are burnt-out-fascists or perma-frustrated, or other types of Slaves in the Master-Slave dialectic, trying entryism into NRx to divide it from within (always unsuccessful, such things only work in Demotist politics).

such things are well known to all ‘scene politics’, even before the Internet.

the fascists can always or typically be exposed by how they don´t
understand either Deleuze or non-omega male slang.
and of course, latent or not-so-latent pathos.

Pseudo-males, with an ersatz spirit, complain about the Jews,
want “White solidarity” (a huge general class that´s never
going to be solid). muh (“White”) Nationalism, pretend
to be NRx. Chads, pseudo-alphas, mockers, jokers,
get stabbed, lose power, derided by the Muslim,
for the better. Vain white man, riteless, spite,
Twitter popus, can´t hold the streets down,
fantasists, mere bulles, to be slayed &
drained, of their blood for the gods.

“You seem to think kicking of[f] RaHoWa is going to be easier than pushing forward on a whole range of Exit technologies and strategies”

There’s a contradiction between pushing forward with exit technologies and strategies on the one hand and once exited having no opposition to sharpen your blade on, or Void forbid cross swords with, in order to push forward on the other. There’s an internal agonism in play no doubt but it’s ossified into a bureaucracy, the notion of a need to check and balance the king doesn’t cross the mind. This follows from the MM mythos, this is Land’s plot of land and you serfs like it, so I can’t fault you on inconsistency. But conditions could be better. Son of Erik, you are a brown-noser, drinking bowls of gruel with a smile on your face.

What hell it would be for Land if michael went full-Breivik with his punctuationless 90 page Anti-NRx Manifesto in his backpack. Go Back Outside ya damn dog you’re getting muds all over the carpet.

Dick Wagner Reply:September 7th, 2016 at 5:38 am

You can tell how twisted the Cathedral is when a mass-murderer gets this kind of treatment:

“Although Breivik is detained in a three-cell complex where he can play video games, watch TV and exercise… Judges heard that Breivik had one cell for living, another for studying and a third for physical exercise, and that although his visits and contacts with the outside world were strictly controlled, he had been provided with exercise equipment, a DVD player, games console, typewriter and books and newspapers.”

>Germanics were like thug niggers, don’t value something unless it has been obtained by pillage.

That´s such a dumb reply tho. Germanics (which obviously does include Anglos, Normans, Saxons, Franks, etc!) have ruled the West for almost 2.000 years, since they took over Rome.
E.g. Merovingians dynasty from 457 AD, Holy Roman Empire, 800-1800 ca., the British Empire and then America, which was a Germanic (WASP) State until just recently (1960´s).

“Women are property. They’re either owned by a man or follow the vibes.”

This was their view of women you pick up autist:

“There resides in women an element of holiness and prophecy, and so [the Germans] do not scorn to ask their advice or lightly disregard their replies. In the reign of the deified Vespasian we saw Veleda long honoured by many Germans as a divinity, whilst even earlier they showed a similar reverence for Aurinia and others, a reverence untouched by flattery or any pretence of turning women into goddesses.”

You heavily underrate the commentariat here, which is typically very cool-headed and not open to the sort of appeal-to-the audience (pathos) that you perform. They don´t have that bad a memory either, so they, if they are even reading your comments, most of them, will notice when you simply take something I have relayed as a fitting description of you and mirror it back on me. Your tactics are far from top-tier, and are very readable. Trying to turn this or this person into this and this troll “literary” device.

You go from one comment saying “Germanics were like niggers” to trying to show their nobility towards women, and that just to make me look bad.

That´s a Feminist tactic. What´s the current status of Feminists on Nietzche re women?

I decided to end me ignoring you, since I´ve had fun making use of your hysteria through replying to it and thus relaying information and conceptions that I already had.

I don’t try to make you look bad, I show how bad you are. Why has this curse befallen you? Was it you or Tantalus who sinned? I don’t think Tacitus is the only source but he’s the most originary one I know of. If whitie has humble origins what would that say about the potential of the dirt races?

“We cannot pass by in silence a further negative aspect of the system… We are dealing with the phenomenon of the cult of the leader (ducismo) represented by Mussolini when we consider in him the quality, conserved inside the system, of the head of a movement and a party, his aiming at a prestige that bordered almost on the tribunician and Napoleonic, the emphasis on his person per se; the inclination which was, if not demagogic, at least somewhat democratic, to ‘go to the people’, not to despise the applause of the piazza. After so many ‘oceanic’ public meetings in front of the Palazzo Venezia, these same people paid him back with a worthy response in 1945.” (Fascism Viewed from the Right)

Would Evola have despised the applause of the AltRight? Even Evola can be viewed from the Right. Compared to the richness and complexity of the writings of Nietzsche, Evola *was* writing for the rabble. ‘Nietzsche’s position is the only one outside of communism’ (Bataille).

What is amusing is that you call me a cuck and Cathedral apologist, while I am to the right of some commentators here — which you then try to appeal to, which is dishonorable.

You´re a brat who came here with pathological comments towards Nick Land which I did not white knight but simply said truth as I saw it, any good lad comes to another good lad´s defense if it´s assaulted by infrahuman forces.

You go from one position to the next, just whatever fits your anarcho-tyrannous bully behavior agenda of not even the day, but the moment.

Nietzsche was a conduit. Guy had almost no ‘private’ life. He was quite autistic.

You can make as many judgments of anyone you lust for, but your Alt-Left Fascism (which pathetically thinks it is Right) will/is be overtaken by alphas who don´t like hysteria or just use the hysteria of Fascist souls for their own purposes (like Anglos did in and after WW2). Trump is deployed to harness this neofascist current, and others are too.

I know a green-haired fat chick who’s to the right of most of the stoned-Sagan spaceship dry-humper commentators here.

“someone mentioned that it was unfortunate that Land had ‘defected’ to the right wing, because he was an interesting theorist and his Accelerationism had a potential to be put to good left-wing use. The thesis I proposed, however – and its one I know that Twitter (in)famous communist Jehu shares – is that for all the good intentions of the Left-Accels, Land’s “right” version of Accelerationism is the only authentic and logically consistent form of Accelerationism, as well as the only one that helps us understand anything about the dynamics of capitalism.”

If he wants to help falling things fall faster he’s quite the moderate host. Granted he (not to mention Moldbug) is FUCKED FOR LIFE because of his “racism”, which isn’t nearly a chug of hemlock juice but I salute him. Still, if you want to play devil why not go all the way?

Besides highlighting the emotional and plebeian factor in the success of the Eleusianian mysteries, the fourth chapter brings into awareness their amazonic tone. The divine woman is worshipped as a principle superior to the masculine principle in a territory which used to be hers, before Indo-European tribes conquered her queendoms, submitting her peoples, that is to say, the Pelasgic tribes. The Eleusinian mysteries were something of a vengeful reconquest in disguise. The hieros gamos which took place at Eleusis between the goddess and the hierophant the last day of each session ended with the following announcement from the latter : « Brimo (Demeter] has given birth to Brimos ! that is, the Strong One to the Strong One » Whatever the identity of this child (see Ariel Guttman,, Kenneth Johnson, Mythic Astrology: Archetypal Powers in the Horoscope, p. 94), whoever gave birth to him (whether it was Demeter or Persephone), what really matters here is the name of the child : ‘Brimo’, meaning ‘terrifying’, ‘wrathful’. Beginning with Augustus, several Roman emperors in the Ist and IId centuries came to Eleusis to be initiated into the Mysteries. In the iconography, some of these emperors were adorned with a corn wreath, one of Isis/Demeter most distinctive attributes. Gallienus went so far as to have coins struck, on which he is represented crowned with corn, and his name is given in the feminine dative singular as follows : « Gallienae Augustae » (« To the August Galliena ») As put by Rigoglioso, « [h]e perceived himself to have become ’emperor as goddess’ and ’emperor belonging to the goddess,’ that deity being Demeter/Persephone. It was understood that unless a man became ‘female,’ he could not enter into the queendom of the underworld. » Demeter/Isis had her vengeance. Beyond vengeance, what was contemplated was a return to the matriarchal conditions that prevailed in Greece prior to the Achean and Dorian conquest, and a resumption of the experiments in parthenogenesis which were conducted in Greece by specialised priestesses as early as in the Bronze age (see M. Rigoglioso, « The Cult of Divine Birth in Ancient Greece ») ; unsurprisingly, what they attempted to produce through asexual and magical methods was mainly a female offspring. There are strong grounds for thinking that, in patriarchal Greece, the thesmophoria, a festival celebrated exclusively by women under the sign of the parthenogenetic bee, served as a laboratory for such experiments.

The method of propagation of the cult of Isis into the Graeco-Roman world (see http://users.auth.gr/pachisp/pdf/05.pdf) comes under scrutiny, as well as the related factors, in the fifth chapter. Two very distinct phases are to be distinguished in the introduction of an exotic cult in a part of a country whose political authorities do not support it and whose ethnic landscape has a certain homogeneity. In the first period, worship keeps a low profile and does everything it can to accentuate its otherness, if only to pick the curiosity of the natives. Gradually, this isolation strategy gives way to an increasingly stronger tendency to communicate with the natives and to adopt their language and customs ; to blend in with regular people is the best way for an exotic cult to become integrated in its new environment, while its priests lobby those who are in high places, until it is recognised by the State, and worship can finally become public. Greek women played a large part in the successful dissemination of Eastern cults both in Greece and, later, in Italy. The permissiveness of Athenian democracy and the taste of some Athenians for the exotic was another significant factor. A third determining element was the proselytism of the Ptolemaic kings, which was first evidenced by Cumont in the epoch-making, unparalleled, work, he published in 1911. Besides, aretologies (hymns to Isis) show the existence of « an ideological project to provide Isis with all the attributes necessary for her integration in the cosmopolitan context of the time » (Giulia Siameni Gasparro, The Hellenistic Face of Isis. Cosmic and saviour Goddess. In Laurent Bricault, Miguel John Versluys, Paul G. P. Meyboom (éds.), Nile Into Tiber: Egypt in the Roman World, p. 59). Syncretism is the consequence of cosmopolitanism in the religious domain.

Most Greek city-States were rather cosmopolitan by the time the political propaganda of the Ptolemies had started, and Greeks were already accustomed to interpreting, and to trying to understand their religion and mythology by comparing them to concepts and religious practices of other peoples, and specifically to identifying their gods (to be sure, at that time, not all the gods they assumed were theirs were actually so) to foreign gods, a trend that quickly degenerated into mania. It is no coincidence that Herodotus, who travelled to Egypt, pioneered in development of this discourse. Yet, he was not the one who devised it. ‘Greeks’ from Asia Minor, who around 640 BC had been authorised by Psammetichus I to found a colony in Naukratis in the Nile Delta, seem to be those who first indulged in the comparison between Greek gods and Egyptian gods (syncretism existed in Prehistoric and Protohistoric Mesopotamia ; see Gebhard Selz, Studies in Early Syncretism: The Development of the Pantheon in Lagas Examples for Inner-Sumerian Syncretism, Acta Sumerologica 12, 1990, p. 111–142). The fifth factor has already been touched upon in the previous lines : the increasing number of metoikoi in Greece, and the subsequent mongrelisation.

The same explanations apply more or less to the penetration of the cult of Isis into Rome, except for the fact that it met with political resistance. The senate was the ultimate instance in religious matters, but it had no criminal jurisdiction. It exercised its prerogatives in these matters vigorously, but not very effectively. Indeed, the Roman religious legislation was vague and loose ; everything was done more or less according to circumstances and events ; senatorial prohibitions were not always followed up. Periods of extreme stringency were followed by periods of inconceivable weakness ; in other words, very harsh magistrates, who understood that Mystery societies, under the guise of religion, aimed at changing the civil institution, offering the most seditious and the most corrupt individuals the opportunity to meet and plot, alternated with unimaginably soft magistrates, whose softness was perhaps proportional to their sympathy for Eastern cults, and, as time went by, to the strain of alien blood in their veins. Septimius Severus (193 – 211 A.D.),a Numidian African Moor, gave two thirds of the seats in the Senate, whose Semitisation had really started under the reign of Trajan, to provincial dignitaries, who were for many of them Asiatics, Syrians, Numidians ; Patrician families were no longer represented in the Senate by 250 A.D. (see Pierre Gaspard Hubert Willems’ unvaluable study : Le Sénat de la République romaine : la composition du Sénat, Ch. Peeters, 1878). « Jam pridem Syrus in Tiberim defluxit Orontes ». What Piganiol called the « pagan reaction » took place in the IVth century in the name of eastern godesses and gods ; it is in Mithraism and in Isiacism [religio of Isis] that Julian drew the precepts of the Church he envisionned to establish in order to oppose Christianity.

The sixth chapter, which opens with an examination of the profound differences between Greek and Roman priesthood and priesthood in Egypt – in short, Greek and Roman priests lived in the world, whilst Egyptian priests were professional priests – and goes on to examine the charge of immorality and lewdness levelled by Latin authors against the priests of Isis, a charge they also laid against priests of other Eastern cults such as Christianity, shows, drawing mainly on Cumont, that Isiacism, albeit being a rival to it, paved the way for Christianity : « The preaching of the Asiatic priests also unwittingly prepared for the triumph of the church which put its stamp on the work at which they had unconsciously labored. Through their popular propaganda they had completely disintegrated the ancient national faith of the Romans, while at the same time the Caesars had gradually destroyed the political particularism. After their advent it was no longer necessary for religion to be connected with a state in order to become universal. Religion was no longer regarded as a public duty, but as a personal obligation ; no longer did it subordinate the individual to the city-state, but pretended above all to assure his welfare in this world and especially in the world to come. The Oriental mysteries offered their votaries radiant perspectives of eternal happiness. Thus the focus of morality was changed. The aim became I to realize the sovereign good in the life hereafter instead of in this world, as the Greek philosophy had done. No longer did man act in view of tangible realities, but to attain ideal hopes. Existence in this life was regarded as a preparation for a sanctified “Life”, as a trial whose outcome was to be either everlasting happiness or everlasting pain. As we see, the entire system of ethical values was overturned. » (The Oriental Religions in Roman Paganism, p. xii-xiii, 1911)

The characteristics of gynaecocracy are outlined in the introduction according to the accounts given by ancient Greek writers of tribal groups either led by women, or governed by matriarchal customs, accounts which J. Evola pondered over, before asking in the mid-1950’s : « Do We live in a Gynaecocratic Society ? », and answering in the affirmative. In the mid-1950’s, there were very few female political schemers, and there were not more women in the private or public sector ; few female civil servants held senior positions ; in some European countries, women were still barred from some professions.

In 2016, one magistrate out of two is a woman in England and Wales ; 80 percent of magistrates in Poland are women. Therefore, it comes as no surprise that, after having found its way in the courtrooms in post-WW2 Europe, the theory put forward by the Jewish criminologist Lombroso in the early XXth century, whereby « the atavistic determinism of the ‘born criminal’ amounted to relativise… guilt, crime » (J. Evola, Psicologia Criminale Ebraica, in La Difesa della Razza, 18), lays down the law, and the criminal is often considered, and actually tried, as if he was the victim, and the victim, the criminal. « La victime est-elle coupable ? Le rôle de la victime dans le meurtre en vue de vol » (« Is the victim guilty? The part of the victim in a theft crime »’) is the title of a book published in 1971 by Presses de l’Université de Montréal ; the jurist who asked this question, a certain Ezzat A. Fattah, is a male jurist. A female jurist surely has the answer, and is only too keen to show she does in her practice. No matter how feminine, a male jurist may have to force his nature, be it slightly, to take Lombrosos’s theory seriously, and Lombroso himself had to force his, when he built it. On the other hand, it is inscribed in a woman’s genes : her legendary more or less well-hidden innate feeling of guilt greatly helps her feeling innocent. The innocent are by definition those who share her feelings. The guilty is by definition the one who embodies a higher law, a higher principle, and manifests, radiates it. For portraying women in his plays as mad, blood-thirsty and depraved, Euripides is tried by the women of Athens gathered at the thesmophoria, who intend to request the death penalty. Women, by their very nature, cannot render justice (ius), but are perfectly qualified to apply so-called natural law, and this is precisely why courtrooms have been feminised. The more the political circus has been stuffed with women, the more freedom of trade and financial flows without barriers, without any limitation, any restriction in the movement of goods, services and people, has become widespread, the more border control has loosened, the more what was left of the State has vanished. The feminisation of the public service has led to the de facto privatisation of the public service. « Parity » will only be achieved when 100 % of the jobs – in the third sector – are held by women. Women are key to globalisation. In fact, globalisation is just a fancy word for feminisation. Globalisation is an externalisation of woman’s nature, and, ultimately, of the materia prima, the « potentiality, absolutely ‘undistinguished’ and undifferentiated universal substance. », to quote R. Guénon. The expression « Mother Earth » is no longer the property of the (Yes)Wiccan(!) movement, it is found in an increasing high number of UN documents. « International Mother Earth Day » was established in 2009, Countless « Mother Earth Rights » conferences, forums, meetings, seminars, congresses are held each year. The U.N. Fourth Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995 featured a full-size « reconstruction » of a supposed « ancient matriarchal village, » complete with a giant pair of female breasts, one above the other, to guard the entrance (http://www.debunker.com/texts/PGDavis2.html). Robert Muller, former Assistant Secretary-General of the UN, and so-called « father of Global Education », whose « World Core Curriculum », progressively implemented by all educational institutions, through self-styled State Education Departments, is founded on the teachings of the Theosophist Alice Bailey and of her Tibetan teacher, was one of his worshippers. He collected a following. While acadhimmics are as ardent to deride clear testimonies of the existence of matriarchal societies in Antiquity as they are eager to push the stroller on week-ends, Amazonism – misnamed « Feminism » – has become self-congratulatory, and its arrogant victory sheer are increasingly echoed in mainstream media, either in a veiled manner (http://catherinesworld.yolasite.com/resources/LedbyHer Gynarchy Article.pdf), or, in the bosom of the Jewess Montaigu’s pamphlet called The Natural Superiority of Women (1999), openly (Melvin Konner, Women After All Sex, Evolution, and the End of Male Supremacy WW Norton & Company, 2015, motherly reviewed at http://www.wsj.com/articles/book-review-women-after-all-by-melvin-konner-1427483355 ; http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/42040/title/Book-Excerpt-from-Women-After-All/, reviewed at https://aryanskynet.wordpress.com/2015/07/02/the-bonoboization-of-the-goyim-dr-melvin-konners-final-solution-to-the-gentile-question). The renewed devotion to the parthenogenetic Virgin Mary (Jim Tetlow, Roger Oaklan et Brad Myers, « Queen of Rome, Queen of Islam: Queen of All », Eternal Productions, http://www.eternal-productions.org/PDFS/Queen.pdf) is accompanied by the intensification of the inter-faith dialogue, the religious aspect of the one world government agenda, under the caring oversight of the UN.

▬ “DOMINANT archaic humans such as Denisovans, Homo Erectus and Neanderthals obliterated modern humans as they stepped on the scene, dazed and confused, 200,000 years ago. Often praised in contemporary literature as the saving grace of the genus Homo, modern humans do in fact represent an irredeemable physical and mental degeneration.

All of the genetic evidence uncovered so far suggests that homo sapiens were on the losing end of a long and excruciatingly painful battle for competition with these archaic humans, who were not condemned to the same perilous status of inadequacy as modern humans. They were better physically adapted to the rigors of the natural world.

For over 200,000 years these apes routinely killed the modern human males and raped their women. We have physical evidence in the form of a modern human pelvis from Israel which had been peforated by a Neanderthal Schoeningen spear. We have evidence in the form of a modern human skull from Kostenki 14 which suffered a head wound that those Neanderthals were known to inflict, such as the one that nearly killed Saint Cesaire.

We have genetic evidence that Neanderthals and Denisovans made excessive contributions to modern human autosomal DNA, but nearly no contributions to the modern human X chromosomes, leading researchers to conclude that these archaics had been breeding the modern human women. From a 2012 paper on Denisovan coverage by M. Meyer:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3617501/?report=classic

Strikingly, Papuans share more alleles with the Denisovan genome on the autosomes than on the X chromosome (P=0.01 by a two-sided test) (Table S28). One possible explanation for this finding is that the gene flow into Papuan ancestors involved primarily Denisovan males. –