babelfish:
yahoo changed the codes so macro nolonger redirects the text properly and just opens the babelfish page. also now supports many more languages.
babelfish is better than google because it's more intelligent.(translations more human-like)

it probably differs with different languages but spanish>english and german>english; i found babelfish making more sense..i think, since i can't say for sure which is more correct but babelfish generates better sentences which are easier to understand.

where i found google to be superior is with eastasian languages like chinese, korean etc. but i run into more european sites than asian so i prefer babel

the code doesn't need updating when translating a whole website (tools>translation)
but when you highlight certain text inside a page and select to translate that text from context menu, it doesn;t send the text properly to babelfish and just opens the babelfish main page.

also the translation languages menu(from and to) when selecting babelfish contains less languages than what babelfish can now support.

Quotedisrupted(unlogged)
babelfish:
yahoo changed the codes so macro nolonger redirects the text properly and just opens the babelfish page. also now supports many more languages.
babelfish is better than google because it's more intelligent.(translations more human-like)

Re: translation macro:needs update

Posted by:
yousaf

Date: June 27, 2009 01:46PM

cilindro.pick up 100%.Tempo de acondicionamiento de tejidos testigos y muestra:mayor a 5 hs.