“Those who are willing to allow the government to establish a Soviet-style
internal passport system because they think it will make us safer are terribly
mistaken. Subjecting every citizen to surveillance and screening points actually
will make us less safe, not in the least because it will divert resources away
from tracking and apprehending terrorists and deploy them against innocent Americans!
Every conservative who believes in constitutional restraints on government should
reject the authoritarian national ID card and the nonsensical intelligence bill
itself.” Congressman Ron Paul, [R-TX], December 7, 2004

The Republican controlled Congress has passed the so-called 'Intelligence Reform
Bill.' Without any doubt in my mind, new world order facilitator George Bush,
Jr. will sign this massive draconian piece of legislation into law.

Next year (2005) the Department of Homeland Security (another monstrous waste
of money and resources) will begin issuing so called "uniformity regulations"
to the sovereign states of the Union requiring that all driver's licenses and
birth certificates meet some federal standards along with biometrics "security"
provisions. Allegedly all Americans, upon birth, will be issued a social security
number. Social security is and always has been a voluntary federal taxing scheme
that people can join by applying for a number under the SSA. Social security
numbers are not automatically issued to anyone.

The states of the Union will no longer have the option of including photographs,
signatures or any other information so mandated by their legislatures. Under
this toxic bill, the states will be required to include everything under the
sun and your personal information will be used by the federal government to
build a huge data base - vulnerable to computer hackers and dishonest employees
like the ones employed by motor vehicle departments who have been caught and
convicted of selling social security numbers on the black market.

Anyone who has been following the building blocks of a one world government
knows this latest abomination has nothing to do with intelligence gathering
or the phony "war on terrorism" that was built on a pack of lies.
This is about controlling our lives and our movements. Road block check points
will be set up and we the people for the first time since this Republic was
birthed, just like the slaves in Stalinist Russia, will be required to "show
your papers!"

Back in 1996, unconstitutional legislation was passed by the Republican controlled
Congress and signed into law by Marxist Bill Clinton which required applicants
for driver's licenses within their respective states to supply a social security
number. The only problem here and this IS the crux of the argument: No one is
required to obtain an SSN to live or work in these united States of America.
This is a legal fact.

How is it then that a person is denied a driver's license because they didn't
voluntarily apply for this insidious "social security" number? Because
the American people don't know the law, same as 99% of those who serve in the
50 state legislatures. That unconstitutional legislation signed into law by Clinton
should have been killed then by the 50 sovereign states of the Union. Forty nine
of the states didn't object and it was based solely on the threat of federal money
getting yanked if they didn't comply.

Candice Miller who was the Secretary of State in Michigan at that time was
the one state official who sued over Clinton's unconstitutional law. But, despite
people like me and constitutional attorney Larry Becraft giving her the ammunition
she needed, she didn't go to the heart of the issue, lost and gave up. Miller
argued privacy rights instead of the legal fact that since no one is required
to obtain a social security number under the law, how could they be forced to
supply one to obtain a state driver's license?

As a side note, Miller was subsequently elected to Congress. She never really
wanted to win the lawsuit I mentioned above, she only did it to pacify her constituents
at the time. How do I know this? Because she ignored the core issue and argued
the losing one. Guess what her position as a member of Congress is on this new
national id/driver's license issue? Why, she voted for it and more! From her
own web site: "Today our committee took resolute action to implement several
of the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission. I am particularly pleased that
the committee followed my call for the setting of standards for states to follow
when issuing identity documents, particularly driver licenses and personal identification
cards." See? She lead the way for the feds to dictate to the states what
they can and can't do, completly ignoring the Tenth Amendment as if it didn't
exist.

Civil Disobedience

What is that? It means that if the speed limit is 65 and you go 70, you have
practiced civil disobedience. I do it everyday because I refuse to wear a seat
belt and the law in California says you must. I refuse and I will continue to
refuse to be bullied by the state. This is called civil disobedience.

There comes a time when an individual either takes a stand against what they
know is wrong or they may as well get down on their knees and clank their chains.
This national id/driver's license must not be allowed to be implemented.

As soon as word came down that this "intelligence" bill passed, I
called the district office of the rat who represents me in Congress and politely
told the staffer that I would not accept any national id or driver's license.
The droid on the phone said that I would have to because it would be the law.
I politely told her to brush up on the Constitution and what constitutes a law,
i.e.:

"The highest law of the land is the Constitution of the United States.
The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing
the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The United States Constitution
is the supreme law of the land, and any statute must be in agreement with it
to be valid. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating
it to be valid; one must prevail over the other." Stephen K. Huber, Professor
of law, University of Houston.

I also conveyed to this thought-less staffer that anyone can go to the Social
Security Administration's web site and find the truth: that parents are NOT
required to obtain a SSN for their newborn. In order for this new requirement
that every person born in America will be forced to accept this number means
that current law would have to have been revised, changed or amended. I requested
a copy of the section in this 'intelligence bill' which shows me how the current
law was amended or changed that would now require newborns or anyone else be
forced into this federal taxing scheme (social security). I'll never get it
from Matsui's office, same as they have never responded to any request I've
ever made to his office. Matsui is someone you hear little about in Congress,
but he is a major globalist who votes for the communist agenda at every opportunity.

The states of the Union are sovereign and as I have pointed out so many times,
the feds know they cannot simply jam anything they want down the throats of
the states - unless the state legislatures stand down. I covered this in a previous
column regarding a memorandum that was obtained regarding Marxist Hillary Clinton's
effort to federalize America's health care system:

Memorandum for Walter Zellman from Sallyanne Payton, clearly marked: Preliminary
Draft for Official Use Only. Do Not Quote or Release For Any Purpose, page 4,
Health Care Task Reform under Hillary Clinton:. Please note these sections:

"(b) may the federal government use other actors in the governmental system
and the private sector as its agents and give them orders as though they were
parts of a prefectorial system? The short answer is "no." State governments
are independent, although subordinated, sovereignties, not subdivisions of the
federal government.

"Although the federal government may regulate many of their functions
directly [as well, for example, it subjects state water districts to the Clean
Water Act], it may not require them to exercise their own governmental powers
in a manner dictated by federal law. The states may be encouraged, bribed or
threatened into entering into joint federal state programs of various sorts,
from unemployment insurance to Medicaid; but they may not be commanded directly
to use their own governmental apparatus in the service of federal policy. There
is a modest jurisprudence of the Tenth Amendment that seems to have settled
on this proposition. See the DOJ [Dept. of Justice] memorandum for a fuller
elaboration."

What does this mean from a constitutional position? It means that the government
can bribe the states, they can threaten them, but in fact, the states cannot
be forced to get down on their knees to the federal machine. This is the major
reason why the Seventeenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was fraudulently
declared ratified - which it was clearly not. The states lost their right to
fire their appointed U.S. Senators for voting on this kind of Nazi legislation
(intel bill), recall them back to their state capitol and replace them with
new U.S. Senators. This is why the Seventeenth Amendment has be exposed and
eliminated.

Will you fight?

This coming week I will head downtown to my state capitol to see the only two
members of our legislature who understand the constitution. I will explain to
both of them that I will refuse to accept a national id or driver's license
issued by the Homeland Security Agency and why. I will also tell them that I
will not surrender my California driver's license to the federal government.

If the feds attempt to force a national id card or driver's license on me,
I will return it with a polite letter. Nor will I fill out and sign any paperwork
sent to me by "Homeland Security." They can then charge me with violation
of whatever law and I will retain legal counsel for the court battle. I will
not sit back and allow my right to freedom of travel, when and where I want,
to be crushed. I believe we the people clearly have the law on our side, the
same as we do in fighting this out of control federal machine on issues like
forced mental health screening. The only question remains is how many Americans
will stand up and say no?

If you want to stop this before it can be implemented, then you must act at
once - Bush hasn't signed this bill yet, but he will. Don't send an e-mail,
call your member of Congress. They millions of e-mails every year. Forget it.
Call them. It's not too late. The local news carried just a blip last Friday
on the radio indicating that already, members of Congress are expressing reservations
about the vote and there was a hint that they might not send it to Bush's desk
- yet. This tells me that the heat from people like me is already getting to
them. What we need is for millions of Americans to flood the offices of Congress
with phone calls- their district offices as well as DC - and tell them you will
refuse the national id and driver's license. For members of the House of Representatives,
go to: www.house.gov; for the senate go to: www.senate.gov. There you will find
the web sites for all members of Congress. Click on yours and find their contact
section which has all their phone and fax numbers.

Call or if you can, get down to your state capitol and meet with your state
representative or state senator. While most state legislators are out of session
until January, their offices are usually open with at least a receptionist.
Ask how to contact your state rep - many work in other occupations when their
legislature is out of session. Contact them now and tell them how you feel.
Remind them that the states of the Union are sovereign and cannot be bullied
by the feds to implement this program. Remind them that they are there to protect
your rights against the federal government stepping all over them. When your
state legislature reconvenes in January, get your group or organization or just
yourself down there and start knocking on doors of state legislators. Put the
heat on the state house. It works - just ask the patriots down in Tennessee.

It doesn't matter if I stand alone on this, but stand I will. The time for writing
columns about it is over. The Republicans have shown their true colors and are
no more bastions of freedom and liberty than Fidel Castro. We the people are being
stripped of our natural rights in furtherance of complete totalitarian government
as the world saw under Stalin, Hitler, Lenin and Chairman Mao. It is now time
for those who really believe in freedom to either stand up and fight this or just
keep typing empty words on a key board.