A ‘No Social Media List’ For Extremists And Potential Terrorists?

You have heard of the “No Fly List”, right? Well, now the Tories are pledging that if they win the next election in the UK they will establish a list of “extremists” that will have to have their social media posts “approved in advance by the police” before they post them. There are also plans to ban “extremists” from broadcasting and speaking at public events. The stated goal of these proposals is to crack down on terrorism, but in the process the civil liberties of the British people are going to be flushed down the toilet. And the American people need to pay close attention to what is going on in the UK, because whatever police state measures are implemented over there usually also get implemented over here eventually. For those that believe that we need to do “whatever it takes” to fight terrorism, there is a very important question that you need to ask yourself. What if the government decides that you are an “extremist” because of what you believe? What will you do then?

Extremists will have to get posts on Facebook and Twitter approved in advance by the police under sweeping rules planned by the Conservatives.

They will also be barred from speaking at public events if they represent a threat to “the functioning of democracy”, under the new Extremist Disruption Orders.

Theresa May, the Home Secretary, will lay out plans to allow judges to ban people from broadcasting or protesting in certain places, as well as associating with specific people.

The plans — to be brought in if the Conservatives win the election in May — are part of a wide-ranging set of rules to strengthen the Government’s counter-terrorism strategy.

This sounds like an Orwellian nightmare for the British people.

And who is an “extremist” anyway?

We are being told that those that belong to ISIS are extremists, and nobody would argue that.

But the article in the Telegraph makes it sound like any group “that spreads or promotes hatred” would be considered extremist. And under these new proposals, even belonging to such a group could get you thrown into prison for up to 10 years…

The Home Secretary will also introduce “banning orders” for extremist groups, which would make it a criminal offence to be a member of or raise funds for a group that spreads or promotes hatred. The maximum sentence could be up to 10 years in prison.

So what does all of that exactly mean?

Would anti-abortion groups be considered “extremist”?

Would groups promoting traditional values be considered “extremist”?

Would groups protesting against the abuses of the British government be considered “extremist”?

Would Christian churches ultimately be considered “extremist” because they don’t agree with the radical liberal agenda of the central government?

Essentially what the Tories propose to do is to tightly regulate all speech. And there is no way to do that without turning the entire United Kingdom into a totalitarian hellhole.

In another case of school officials adhering to ridiculous zero tolerance policies, a student from South Carolina was suspended and arrested by police recently after writing an imaginative story about using a gun to shoot a dinosaur.

The offender, 16-year-old Alex Stone of Summerville High School in a suburb of Charleston was in the course of completing an assignment where students were asked to write something brief about themselves, much like Facebook status updates.

Stone told reporters that he found himself in hot water with teachers for being over imaginative and mentioning the word ‘gun’.

This is utter insanity, and it is getting worse with each passing day.

And it is not just kids that have to deal with this kind of thing. A Big Brother police state control grid is being slowly constructed all around us. And authorities are preparing for the day when they will have to use lethal force to keep the population in line. Just check out the following excerpt from a recent Infowars report…

A document released by the U.S. Army details preparations for “full scale riots” within the United States during which troops may be forced to engage in a “lethal response” to deal with unruly crowds of demonstrators.

The appearance of the document amidst growing unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, with the National Guard now being called in to deal with the disorder, is an ominous coincidence.

The 132-page document, titled U.S. Army Techniques Publication 3-39.33: Civil Disturbances (PDF), was written in April 2014 and recently obtained by Public Intelligence.

The document makes it clear that the techniques detailed therein are to be applied both outside and inside the “continental United States (CONUS)” in the event of “unruly and violent crowds” where it is “necessary to quell riots and restore public order.”

The training manual outlines scenarios under which, “Civil unrest may range from simple, nonviolent protests that address specific issues, to events that turn into full-scale riots.”

So precisely who is the government so concerned about anyway?

If ISIS and other Islamic terror groups are the problem, why train to fight against Americans?

Sadly, the truth is that much of the focus in the “war on terror” has been turned inward during the Obama administration. Many officials in the federal government now insist that “homegrown terror” is the greatest threat that we face.

Below is a list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” and “potential terrorists” in official U.S. government documents. To see the original source document for each point, just click on the link. As you can see, this list covers most of the country…

Post navigation

Ask not for whom the Bell Tolls, it tolls for thee . . .
Hemingway was right, though this is not an exact quote.
It started years ago with the buying up of all the news media by a select few people. Now the main media news sources are all controlled by said people.
It is like looking at Pravda in Russia sometimes.
I am friends with editors due to my association with a newspaper over the years in the production department. I once asked them why they did not report on a near miss of an asteroid? It wasn’t important enough! Well we missed main lining America with an asteroid that could have taken out half the country if it had hit in the right place at the wrong time. Well that is just disturbing.
People are better off with their heads in the sand.
What they don’t know, won’t hurt them. Right?
Anyway, it missed. This time . . .
The internet is the last thing that tells news like it is. Or did.
Because in the future, this news media will also be shut down and controlled by government goons.
You will know because it all looks pasterized.
Right now there are all kinds of uncensored sites out there.
I suggest we have not heard the last from the government on drafting people into the army.
What a load of crap! If ever there was an illegal agency it has to be the one that determined whether people were drafted or not.
For one, it was totally discriminatory against males. No females ever were drafted that I know about.
It was totally discriminatory against any male that was healthy. If you were not perfectly healthy they did not want you in any capacity to be drafted.
If you had a criminal record, you were not drafted.
Drafted meant at one time going to Vietnam and being killed.
You could luck out and get another assignment less hazardous.
It discriminated against the poor. If you had money, you got a deferment.
Yet we still have selective service cards in case of a draft.
What about all the illegals just let in the country. Do they have to have a card? It is totally discriminatory.

kfilly

Screw the UN! Screw communism! Screw Agenda 21! Screw Muslim extremists! Screw the New World Order! Molon Labe! Clear enough for you traitors at the NSA?

seth datta

BASICALLY IF YOU’RE ANTI-ZIONIST (WHO ARE THE PEOPLE BEHIND ALL OF THE GLOBAL AND MUCH OF THE DOMESTIC WOES WE SEE TODAY).