In his letter Ballmer expressed frustration at this "limited interaction," stating that what little action the pair had was not "meaningful." He states that this is "unfortunate." Ballmer fumes, "Our goal in making such a generous offer was to create the basis for a
speedy and ultimately friendly transaction. Despite this, the pace of
the last two months has been anything but speedy."

Ballmer writes that Yahoo has two choices -- accept the offer within three weeks and prepare for the merger in earnest or face a proxy battle in which Microsoft will seek to oust the Yahoo's board of directors and replace them with a new pro-Microsoft board.

Microsoft increasing aggression in its hostile takeover attempt seems to confirm reports by analyst that Microsoft would not raise its bid, which offers a 62 percent premium on the company. Ballmer writes angrily, "The public equity markets and overall economic conditions have weakened considerably. At the same time, public indicators suggest that Yahoo!’s search and
page view shares have declined. Finally, you have adopted new plans at
the company that have made any change of control more costly."

Microsoft hopes to avoid a proxy battle, but is willing to enter one if necessary. Such a battle would be costly both financially and to the reputation of Microsoft. However, it would be particularly costly to Yahoo, which would be rocked by having its board deposed. Ballmer states that if the terms are not met, the proxy battle will begin in three weeks. Warns Ballmer, "If we are forced to take an offer directly to your shareholders, that
action will have an undesirable impact on the value of your company."

A Yahoo spokesman would not comment on the letter. For the full Ballmer letter, refer here.

Comments

Threshold

Username

Password

remember me

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

.. AMD's acquisition of ATi. Just as with that disastrous ATi acquisition, the timing is off by about a year or so. With the looming recession, Yahoo's business will fall off markedly, while Microsoft currently sits on a huge bundle of cash - implicit recession-proofing. In about a year Microsoft could pick up Yahoo for a song. Now Microsoft will throw away that great cushion of cash -- for what ? Why not just hire away the best brains in Yahoo, and if necessary pay them handsomly to do nothing for a year or two if there is any prospect of litigation over trade-secrets? Yahoo is just a software company.. it manufactures nothing tangible. Hire away the brains and they are dead.

You can hire away the brains but you can not hire away the IP rights, trademarks, and brand usage.

So, essentially, you'd have to start from scratch. If you buy Yahoo outright, then you own everything and the next day people are visiting Yahoo's site, which is owned by you.

I don't want the merger to happen though :( I feel like it'd be selling my friends child to an army of hell-bent intergalactic empire wishing nothing more than to force everyone to submit to their will.