On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 05:13:08PM -0400, Lori Paniak wrote:
>> I think this attempt (third try?) is coming pretty close to being
> acceptable. All that is needed is a clause allowing lock circumvention
> for personal purposes.
Rather, remove the whole idea of digital locks being legally enforcable in
the first place.
Digital locks enforced by law are the equivalent of a two-class copyright
system. Those that make the locks make the rules, regardless of how
balanced the rest of the copyright act is.
- Chris