originally posted by: AlongCamePaul
There are multiple ways to produce free energy many of which have nothing to do with zero point energy or universal basic elemental construct.

If you can produce an adiabatic process or very close to it, it can be used as a free energy producing device.

Such talks will get you killed, your family killed. Or worse locked in a padded cell on a morphine drip for no reason at all.

The super powers have killed before behind such talk, let alone a working concept.

If you've done months worth of patent research you'd see that there are many free energy devices with incomplete schematics and or diagrams. You'd
have to wonder why many of these have not been developed into working concepts. Then you find the patent holder has died mysteriously, or considered
legally insane.

Why would the superpowers you mention not be more interested in paying you off and selling the devices globally for untold wealth?

An example. Until the discovery of blue light emitting diodes, white led light was impossible, since you need red, green and blue. The man who first
created a blue led did so in his spare time at his company, creating a billion or trillion dollar industry of white led bulbs. He just won a belated
Nobel prize for his efforts.

Was he killed? Nope. Was he threatened? Nope.

The man changed the world and made low power bulbs and cheap light sources possible.

Still alive

because an LED uses power it doesn't produce it. It would seem you missed my point entirely.

It is even better than Tesla! If such a thing is possible. And Tewari's explanation should make anybody wary.

He explains what he has done by him reformulating all of physics in terms of ancient Vedic texts. So using prana from which all matter manifests from
that he can take aakash (sp?) in motion to be used and harnessed in a magnetic device that has achieved 238% efficiency! Efficiency as compared to
what, IDK. But it is 238% man! Acknowledge the achievements of Tesla as moved by Vedic texts! See, he is using aakash vortices to make an over unity
device! Genius!

So Dance with Shiva and let some over unity love manifest from aakash vortex to push magnets around!

[/sarcasm
ETA: This is what happens when you cross religion and science. Meta-mystic explanations that are no longer bound in science. Makes for great movie
plots but not very good over unity machines. The thing has straps on it! *SMH*]

So then, semantics is at the heart of your objection. "Free energy" might be the wrong description, but the idea that there are energy sources
unknown to man, untapped by man, is not difficult for me to accept.

It is even better than Tesla! If such a thing is possible. And Tewari's explanation should make anybody wary.

He explains what he has done by him reformulating all of physics in terms of ancient Vedic texts. So using prana from which all matter manifests from
that he can take aakash (sp?) in motion to be used and harnessed in a magnetic device that has achieved 238% efficiency! Efficiency as compared to
what, IDK. But it is 238% man! Acknowledge the achievements of Tesla as moved by Vedic texts! See, he is using aakash vortices to make an over unity
device! Genius!

So Dance with Shiva and let some over unity love manifest from aakash vortex to push magnets around!

[/sarcasm
ETA: This is what happens when you cross religion and science. Meta-mystic explanations that are no longer bound in science. Makes for great movie
plots but not very good over unity machines. The thing has straps on it! *SMH*]

originally posted by: AlongCamePaul
There are multiple ways to produce free energy many of which have nothing to do with zero point energy or universal basic elemental construct.

If you can produce an adiabatic process or very close to it, it can be used as a free energy producing device.

Such talks will get you killed, your family killed. Or worse locked in a padded cell on a morphine drip for no reason at all.

The super powers have killed before behind such talk, let alone a working concept.

If you've done months worth of patent research you'd see that there are many free energy devices with incomplete schematics and or diagrams. You'd
have to wonder why many of these have not been developed into working concepts. Then you find the patent holder has died mysteriously, or considered
legally insane.

Why would the superpowers you mention not be more interested in paying you off and selling the devices globally for untold wealth?

An example. Until the discovery of blue light emitting diodes, white led light was impossible, since you need red, green and blue. The man who first
created a blue led did so in his spare time at his company, creating a billion or trillion dollar industry of white led bulbs. He just won a belated
Nobel prize for his efforts.

Was he killed? Nope. Was he threatened? Nope.

The man changed the world and made low power bulbs and cheap light sources possible.

The planets and moon are all running around producing energy, creating magnetic fields, and moving along. That is energy, and more than one
type.

Moving in an orbit and rotating do not require further energy expenditure. Nor does sustaining a magnetic field, although the way planets do it
probably extracts energy from the rotation of the planet. So no, planets and moon are not running around producing energy.

So then, semantics is at the heart of your objection. "Free energy" might be the wrong description, but the idea that there are energy sources
unknown to man, untapped by man, is not difficult for me to accept.

They actually have to be sources, though. Magnets, springs, buoyancy, gravity and a number of others are NOT.

A sure giveaway that the article is bogus is if they invoke Tesla. It's a sort of free energy Godwin's Law.

Stanley Meyer died suddenly on March 20, 1998, after dining at a restaurant. His brother claimed that during a meeting with two Belgian investors in a
restaurant, Meyer suddenly ran outside, saying "They poisoned me

maybe you can start your own investigations
before dismissing so readily

The planets and moon are all running around producing energy, creating magnetic fields, and moving along. That is energy, and more than one
type.

Moving in an orbit and rotating do not require further energy expenditure. Nor does sustaining a magnetic field, although the way planets do it
probably extracts energy from the rotation of the planet. So no, planets and moon are not running around producing energy.

The earth is producing heat inside the core from radioactive decay. That is energy. So, yes it does produce energy.

Stanley Meyer died suddenly on March 20, 1998, after dining at a restaurant. His brother claimed that during a meeting with two Belgian investors in a
restaurant, Meyer suddenly ran outside, saying "They poisoned me

maybe you can start your own investigations
before dismissing so readily

The fact is that I don't believe in free energy, over unity etc machines. I undestand the physics and know at our present level of understanding at
least, it can't be done.

Therefore I'm not interested in any of these guys who died since they couldn't have been murerded for their discovery of free energy, since it cannot
exist.
Therefore, for me, it would be pointless googling them.

The planets and moon are all running around producing energy, creating magnetic fields, and moving along. That is energy, and more than one
type.

Moving in an orbit and rotating do not require further energy expenditure. Nor does sustaining a magnetic field, although the way planets do it
probably extracts energy from the rotation of the planet. So no, planets and moon are not running around producing energy.

The earth is producing heat inside the core from radioactive decay. That is energy. So, yes it does produce energy.

Uhhh no, the plantes are only transfering energy that was previously utilized. Those radioactive heavy elements that are decaying were produced in the
death throws of earlier stars, after they fused all their hydrogen, then helium, cabon, oxygen and so on. The earth, as does all mass, does produce
gravitational energy, which helps keep the core hot, along with the radioactives, and latent heat left over from the formation of the solar system,
which by the way is basically all gravitational.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.