On 01/09/07, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@gmail.com> wrote:> I urge developers to not bait into this and just leave this alone.> Those involved know what they are doing and have a strong team of> attorneys watching their backs. Any *necessary* discussions are be> done privately.

Err...

I don't understand why you need a lawyer to interpret this document:

/* $OpenBSD: ar5210.c,v 1.39 2007/04/10 17:47:55 miod Exp $ */

/* * Copyright (c) 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 Reyk Floeter <reyk@openbsd.org> * * Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any * purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above * copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies. * * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES * WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF * MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR * ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES * WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. */

If you want to add more code to it, and your contribution issignificant, simply add you name next to Reyk's. Where's the problem?

I don't know how licensing could be any simpler than this. Please,notice, that there are no additional documents (other than thecopyright law) to read here -- _this is the complete licence_! (Andyou have to read the copyright law even if you use the GNU GPL.)