Transcription

1 THE RESPONSIBILITY OF LAWYERS FOR THE JUSTICE OF THEIR CAUSES Duncan Kennedy* I want to thank you, the graduating class, for inviting me to speak today. And to congratulate you and your families on the achievement this day represents. This is the first time I have been asked to give a graduation speech, and I feel some trepidation at the beginning of my new career. The subject I have chosen is an aspect of a larger topic: The Responsibility of Lawyers for the Justice of their Causes, surely one of the most boring ever invented to fill the time before you finally have your diploma in hand. But first, how about a brief, sentimental, even silly moment of celebration before the serious business. Look around you for a friendly fellow student or a family member. Indulge yourselves: smile, or frown, or make a face, or ignore that person completely. For some of you, an ordeal is over. For almost all of you, I suspect, there have been moments of feeling wounded or lost, frightened or humiliated, in jeopardy. Well folks, you've crossed over the line: you are the alumni. You are also crossing over the line into the life of the profession. That is something you can look forward to. It s not that you can be proud just to be a lawyer. After all, there are good lawyers and bad ones. But you can be proud of the powers you have acquired through the study of law, and proud of that tradition within the law in which lawyers use their powers to help others for the common good. This is an exacting tradition. Many lawyers aspire to it. Some achieve it. I hope you will be of that number. And now to my business. I want to do something very lawyerlike: to make an argument in favor of a position, of an attitude you might adopt, and I think ought to adopt, toward your practice of law in the years ahead. * Professor, Harvard Law School. In slightly different form, this essay was presented as the Commencement Address, Washington College of Law, American University, May

2 1158 TEXAS TECH LAW REVIEW [Vol. 18:1157 Begin with a vacuous piety: Try your best, oh graduating students of the Washington College of Law, to avoid doing harm with your lawyer skills. If I asked each of you to swear an oath to try to avoid doing harm with your lawyer skills, I bet most of you would say, "Why object? All right, boss, you're the graduation speaker, sounds harmless, even obvious, to me, I hereby pledge myself to avoid doing harm with my lawyer skills." But I think this vacuous piety has some controversial bite. It would get many lawyers into trouble. To make the pledge controversial, let me put aside two of its easy meanings. When you represent a client, you should do your best for her, or him. That means: avoid malpractice, and who can quarrel with that. Then there's another, slightly more touchy point. I think we would all agree that a lawyer doesn't in most situations have to take on a client. If you think the client is trying to do something terrible, and wants to use your lawyer skills to do harm, you don't have to take the case, unless a court appoints you to take it. Your right-to-turn-down-a-case goes beyond just not having to do something to help a person with evil intentions. You might not take the case because you didn't want to contribute or even be associated in any way with a client you thought was bad. Your cases are yours to choose on any basis you want. I know this is a little controversial because of the reaction from the establishment bar and editorial writers when students around the country began a boycott of hiring interviews with firms that represent the South African government. A lot of lawyers thought it was outrageous for students to try to influence law firms, or to interfere with the ability of the South African government to get counsel, by threatening not to go to work for those firms. I want to go a step further than those students. While it's true no one should blame you for refusing to represent a client whose activity you disapprove of, that's not enough. You should feel guilty, and we should disapprove of you, if you go ahead and argue a cause you think will do more harm than good. You shouldn't take the case if you think it would be better for society, or more moral, for the client to lose. You shouldn't take the case if you think the client shouldn't be in court in the first place, for example, because the client should morally have made recompense even though he has a technically good legal defense. You shouldn't take the case if your client is enforcing his legal rights, but is using his legal rights in a bad cause. This is the tough meaning of the vacuous piety that you should

3 1987] RESPONSIBILITY OF LAWYERS 1159 avoid doing harm with your lawyer skills. Most lawyers don't agree with it at all. They believe that you are not tarred morally by your clients' underlying intentions, or character, or by the outcome, as long as you don't participate in law breaking yourself. Maybe they make an exception and condemn Mafia lawyers, even when they aren't involved directly in criminal activity. But that's about it. I think you are tarred with bad actions of clients that you facilitate in your work as a lawyer. To the extent this is right, it is wrong to represent an abortion clinic that's trying to lease a new building to expand its operations, if you are pro-life. And it's wrong to represent a landlord who has been intimidated into trying to evict an abortion clinic if you are pro-choice. It's wrong to work against unionization if you believe everyone should have a labor union; and wrong to work for union rights to picket a shopping center if you think unions are generally evil. It's wrong to lobby for the postponement of environmental controls if you think they should be imposed right now; and wrong to do antitrust work against a corporate merger, if you believe mergers are good for the economy. My position is extreme, and it will certainly apply to you at some point in your lives as lawyers. I suppose that's what graduation speeches are at least sometimes for. I'm saying you should turn down the client even though she isn't trying to get you to do anything illegal, and even though she isn't doing anything illegal herself. She just wants you to argue that the abortion clinic has violated its lease, which you don't believe is the case, or that the merger violates the antitrust laws. I'm saying that if you think the outcome of winning-for-your-client would be on balance a bad thing, socially unfortunate, you should decline to participate, in spite of the fact that the client will pay, and that you wouldn't be doing anything that came close to violating the canons of professional ethics. You'd be in the clear as far as "unethical conduct" is concerned, as it's defined by your profession. But I'm suggesting that you'd be morally in the wrong anyway. There are lots and lots of objections to what I've just said. I'm going to try to shoot down about twenty of them in rapid succession. First, what about the Porsche? I don't mean mine (I don't have one); I mean the one you might imagine in your future. The short answer is that there's plenty of money to be made out there, for most lawyers most of the time, without becoming a hired gun that's what we're talking about, the lawyer as a gun for hire regardless of the morals of the client. At least at present, there are tons of morally

4 1160 TEXAS TECH LAW REVIEW [Vol. 18:1157 innocuous, or positively beneficial, or neutral, lawyer work. Most lawyer work falls into that category for most people. If sticking to that type of work involves some loss of income, so be it. Maybe you'll win a Porsche in the lottery. Second, if I don't do it, someone else will. But that doesn't make it right for you to do it. You should avoid doing harm with your lawyer skills even if there is someone else waiting to take your place. Third, what can be wrong, indeed why isn't it a good thing, to help people enforce their rights? Lawyers should be devoted to legality, but I am proposing that they refuse clients on non-legal grounds on the grounds that, though within their rights, the clients in question are doing more harm than good. The simple answer is that law is not coterminous with morality: there is a vast range of behavior that harms people without legal remedy, and when lawyers help people do that harm, they can't escape responsibility for it if it is immoral. Legality is important. It's a good starting point for the discussion. But that your client had a legal right to injure and get away with it doesn't mean that you can have a clear conscience, even if your role was just routinely technical, and it wasn't you who chose the course of action, if the course of action was immoral. Further, lawyers are often maybe usually more than just legal technicians. They shape deals and they make law. They invent new forms of social life, they fill gaps, resolve conflicts and ambiguities. They mold the law, through the process of legal argument, in court, in briefs, in negotiations. It won't do to say, look, I molded the law this way, and this way, and this way. I've made a lot of law. But don't hold me responsible for the actual content of the law I made. That was determined by who happened to be my client at the time. I chose my clients according to their ability to pay. What concern is it of mine if the law they paid me to make goes against my own moral beliefs? I'm just an advocate and I leave the final decision to others. The trouble with this is that your activity is not neutral, and the better your legal skills, the less neutral you become. Lawyers think up new rules, ideas, arrangements and arguments. Which ones win, which ones judges and juries and legislatures adopt, is a function of who has the legal talent on their side, as well as a function of the justice of the position. If you put your legal talent on the side of outcomes you disapprove of, you make it at least a little more

5 1987] RESPONSIBILITY OF LAWYERS 1161 likely that bad outcomes, bad new inventions of your own, will prevail. You bear responsibility when your unique way of molding the law, your work product, wins out to the detriment of the community, even if it was not you, but a judge or administrator who "pulled the trigger," so to speak, by actually deciding the case, and even if someone else would have done it if you didn't. But what would happen to the right to counsel if lawyers were always second-guessing the justice of their clients' causes? And what about Our Adversary System? Isn't it based on the lawyers going all out for their clients, and letting truth emerge through conflict? It's up to the jury or the judge to decide on the justice of the case; it's up to the lawyer to present the best possible case for her side, whichever it may be. These are serious objections, and I'm willing to make some concessions to recognize some counterprinciples to the one I'm arguing for. After all, even on this day of days there are no absolutes. First, I am not saying that you should represent bad clients halfheartedly or incompetently. I'm talking about the choice of clients. Once you sign on, it seems to me you are somewhat stuck with being an adversary within the adversary system, unless something unexpected happens that means you have to withdraw. This can pose a lot of delicate problems, if you are really trying not to use your lawyer skills in ways that harm people. But that's not my issue. Second, people, including your potential clients, have a right to counsel, in the sense that the state will provide one if they can't afford one, only in a few situations in some aspects of the criminal justice system, and in some, though by no means all, family law situations. The only other sense in which they have a right to counsel is that the state will not forbid them to have a lawyer if they can find one they can afford. The right to counsel does not mean that clients whose causes hurt the body politic have a right to your counsel just because they have the money to pay for it. I think it's morally fine to be a public defender or a legal services lawyer, in spite of the fact that you will sometimes find yourself representing guilty or immoral people. In those cases, there has been a social decision that people should have lawyers even if they can't afford them. I'd go further, and say that if a prospective client can't get a lawyer unless you represent them, and if they are likely to be treated unfairly by the system if they don't have a lawyer, then you ought to take the case to prevent the injustice of their being unrepresented.

6 1162 TEXAS TECH LAW REVIEW [Vol. 18:1157 But what I'm talking about is this: ought you, or ought you not to do the paperwork for a real estate developer who is acting legally and completely within his rights in buying up 100 low income apartments housing 400 poor people and converting them to 40 condominiums housing 80 yuppies, when the poor people will have to move into smaller apartments for higher rents and increase the starch content of their children's diets? I say you ought not to do it, and the right to counsel is irrelevant. Let some other lawyer do it, or let the developer do it himself, in the unlikely event that no one else can be bought. I think the real objection to my proposal is that it contradicts our sense that it's okay to distribute legal services among people according to how much money they can pay. Lawyers want to feel that because society has left the decision about who gets a lawyer, and what lawyer (an incompetent or the best money can buy) to the market, then it's all right for them to forget about it, while selling their own services for what they will command, regardless of the morality of the legal activity. If you if most lawyers took the choice of clients seriously according to the vacuous piety that you should avoid doing harm with your lawyer skills, it seems likely that some clients would have to pay more for less legal service, and other people would get more service for less money. Your moral intuitions would influence the distribution of legal talent, through the market, along with the buying power of clients. Would that be better or worse than the current situation? I think it would be better. At present, the distribution of legal services is a disgrace: rich people get vastly more than they need or deserve; middle income people can't afford a lawyer in numerous situations in which they are ripped off for relatively small amounts of money, or discriminated against on sexual or racial grounds, or seriously injured. Poor people have virtually no access to legal services, given the abysmal underfunding of the Legal Services Corporation. If lawyers felt morally responsible for their individual contribution to this allocation of legal services, it seems likely to me that they would improve it, though perhaps only marginally. This would hurt, probably, some current excess consumers of lawyer time. If you applied your moral judgment to the choice of clients not just occasionally but in every case, you might often choose in ways that I disagreed with. Though I think the overall pattern of choices would probably be better than that which emerges from a market

7 1987] RESPONSIBILITY OF LAWYERS 1163 where human suffering counts for nothing and dollars for everything, I am in favor of taking client morality into account for its own sake. My proposal is leftwing only in the very general sense of being for liberation and responsibility, even if the consequences may sometimes be conservative. That's my sermon folks. Now file it away in the great video library of memory. Maybe one day when the senior partner plunks the papers down on your desk, you'll hear that vacuous piety whispering in your ear: Try not to use your lawyer skills in ways that do harm. Thank you.

This is the most effective and powerful script for securing appointment with FSBO's you will ever put to use. This scrip will increase your appointment closing ratio by 50-60%. The thing to keep in mind

ATTORNEYS, MANAGERS AND THE ASSOCIATION 5235617 Attorneys, Managers and the Association Serving and Surviving In A Unique Relationship By Matthew Perlstein, Esq. (Reprinted with Permission) INTRODUCTION

Medical Malpractice VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS INTRODUCTION: Tell the jurors that this is a very big and a very important case. Do a SHORT summary of the case and the damages we are seeking. This summary should

Here's Your Free Report... How To Stop Foreclosure! Dear Homeowner, My name is Michael Riley. I am a Real Estate Investor and I can share with you the secrets to saving your home from foreclosure. I have

2009-8-18 0 Insurance and Gambling Eric Hehner Gambling works as follows. You pay some money to the house. Then a random event is observed; it may be the roll of some dice, the draw of some cards, or the

Dialog: VIP LESSON 001 - Alimony A: Why is Kevin selling his house? B: He's getting a divorce and says he won't be able to pay for it after he pays alimony and child support. A: Why is he getting a divorce?

Seven Things You Must Know Before Hiring a DUI Attorney Seven Things to Know Before Hiring a DUI Attorney Copyright 2014 SmartWeb Online 1 Introduction Some people don t quite understand the severity of

Flat Rate Per Claim -vs- Percentage Billing Fees A Devil's Advocate View Assuming a full service solution, there are basically two methods billing services use to charge for their services, either a percentage

When You Need a Lawyer When You Need a Lawyer Who needs a family lawyer? Sooner or later, almost everyone needs the advice and services of a lawyer. In our increasingly complex society, many situations

Consumer Awareness How to Keep From Getting Ripped Off by Big Insurance Provided as an educational service by: Anthony D. Castelli, Esq. Concentration in Auto and Work Related Injuries (513) 621-2345 ATTENTION!!!

Dialog: VIP LESSON 049 - Future of Business A: We really embarrassed ourselves last night at that business function. B: What are you talking about? A: We didn't even have business cards to hand out. We

Common Myths About Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Cases 1 By B. Keith Williams There are several myths about accident cases and the attorneys that handle them. It is important to keep these myths in

Settling Your Injury Case... Without a Lawyer How to maximize the value of your claim under $10,000 The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only. Shulman DuBois LLC does not

How To Choose Your Lawyer. If You Can t Afford To Pay For Your Lawyer. How To Find A Lawyer H iri N G a L a W yer How to CHOOSE YOUR LAWYER It is important to choose a lawyer who can work well with you.

LIST BUILDING PROFITS BUILD YOUR LIST THE RIGHT WAY Jonathan Leger COURTESY OF LEARNFROMJON.COM - PRIVATE BUSINESS COACHING FROM A MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR INTERNET MARKETER + ACCESS TO PREMIUM AND EXCLUSIVE

You are probably reading this guide because you were recently in an automobile accident. Now you are faced with some difficulties. The tasks of managing your care and your insurance claim can be confusing

Divorce Mediation Myths Debunking divorce mediation myths: Facts about the mediation process. Myth: Mediation allows one spouse to dominate another. Fact: A good mediator pays close attention to the power

Best Marketing Strategy for Solos Getting Clients through Those Doors! What's your best most effective marketing strategy? Get any work you can on any terms--including free. Do excellent work. The word

You're Getting Divorced: Now What? You've decided that your marriage just isn't working out, and that you need to get a divorce. It's not an easy decision, but it's one you feel you have to make. Or, your

If You have Been Arrested Don t Do Anything Until You Read My Special Report! If you have been arrested by the police for a criminal offense, you re probably confused or worried about what steps to take

How to Perform a Break-Even Analysis in a Retail Store A Step by Step Guide By BizMove Management Training Institute Other free books by BizMove that may interest you: Free starting a business books Free

name: Emily state: Texas story: My husband has borrowed money from his parents many different times without my knowing. I think that if you expect repayment, a written loan agreement or share secured loan

How to Create Winning Joint Ventures Jim Ingersoll here with another segment on private lender financing and your private lending course. I'm excited to have you along. Now that you know why you want to

How to Outsource Inbound Marketing Services to Other Agencies Written by Spencer Powell of TMR Direct Table of Contents Why Outsource? Sustainable MRR No developing systems and best practices No need to

Mortgage Guide and Helpful Tips Dear Prospective Home Owner, Let me tell you that home ownership is one of the key ingredients to building wealth. Take any 100 people at the start of their working careers

Hip Replacement Recall A Special Report What You MUST Know About Metal Toxicity and the Seven Biggest Mistakes that could prevent you from getting the compensation you deserve Your Hip Recall Help Team

Do Solo PI Lawyers Often Advance Fees? Hello everyone: As solo personal injury attorneys, do you often agree to advance fees on your PI cases? Naturally, the costs of litigating such claims are unpredictable

Rent to Own Housing A rent to own housing agreement is not a good idea unless you are in very good financial condition and know that you will be so for the foreseeable future. There are many disadvantages

Google Lead Generation For Attorneys - Leverage The Power Of Adwords To Grow Your Law Business FAST You re about to discover the secrets of fast legal practice success with Google AdWords. Google AdWords

INTRODUCTION The purpose of this handbook is to provide answers to some very basic questions that inmates or inmates families might have regarding the processes of the criminal justice system. In no way

A Practical Guide to Hiring a LAWYER A PRACTIAL GUIDE TO HIRING A LAWYER I. Introduction 3 II. When do you Need a Lawyer? 3 III. How to Find a Lawyer 4 A. Referrals 4 B. Lawyer Referral Service 5 C. Unauthorized

'S VAN: AN ACCIDENT STORY PART TWO CHARACTERS: Dan Davis, a 28-yr-old independent construction contractor Tanya, Dan's wife, an assistant manager at Kmart Female recorded voice at Nationwide Richard, a

Chapter 4 Legal Ethics Yes. You read that right legal ethics. Har de har. Go ahead. Get it out of your system. How about this one? Why do scientists prefer using lawyers over lab rats? There are some things

Incorporation Guide Guide to Incorporating and Forming a Limited Liability Company Toll-Free: 877-692-6772 Direct/Intl: 818-224-7639 Our Incorporation Guide is developed with the help of the small business

Computer Forensics for Business Leaders: Building Robust Policies and Processes Transcript Part 1: Why Policy Is Key Stephanie Losi: Welcome to CERT's podcast series: Security for Business Leaders. The

Interview Schedule for Divorce Lawyers Divorce Lawyers at Work: Varieties of Professionalism in Practice I. I would like to start by asking you a few general questions about your training and experience

1 Google Lead Generation For Attorneys Leverage The Power Of AdWords To Grow Your Law Business FAST You re about to discover the secrets of fast legal practice success with Google AdWords. Google AdWords

Dealing With Weaknesses and Maintaining Credibility By Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan While many trial lawyers focus on the credibility of their witnesses, a truism remains: No one s credibility is more

Session 8 Smith, Is There A Prima Facie Obligation to Obey the Law? Identifying the Question Not: Does the fact that some act is against the law provide us with a reason to believe (i.e. evidence) that

TAXI and TLC-Licensee CASES A Guide to Your Hearing at the OATH Tribunal 40 Rector Street, 6th Floor New York, NY TABLE OF CONTENTS Taxi and TLC-Licensee Cases Heard at OATH.......3 Should I Get a Lawyer?.

"I m One Of The UK s Top Horse Racing Tipsters & I m Going To Show You My Closely Guarded Secrets Of How I Make Thousands From Horse Racing So You Can Too!" Date Hello, Good Afternoon and Welcome to Pegasus

PARENT GUIDE TO THE JUVENILE COURT CHIPS PROCESS INTRODUCTION This booklet has been prepared to help parents gain a better understanding of what to expect in Juvenile Court CHIPS proceedings (Chapter 48

The Police Have Left Word That They Want to Speak With You What Does it Mean and What Should You Do? Don A. Murray, Esq. Shalley & Murray 125-10 Queens Blvd., Suite 10 Kew Gardens, NY 11415 273 Sea Cliff

How to Choose the Right Credit Card Processing Company How To Choose The Right Credit Card Processing Company If you're in business these days, you need to accept credit cards. The problem is, which type

You and Your Lawyer Public Legal Education and Information Service of New Brunswick Public Legal Education and Information Service of New Brunswick (PLEIS-NB) is a non-profit charitable organization. Its

Software Piracy: What You Should Know Whether you call it borrowing, copying, sharing or "fair use," software piracy is illegal and puts Montana Tech's students, faculty and staff, as well as the college

THE EMPLOYMENT ACT AND YOU GUIDE FOR EMPLOYEES An explanation of your rights, benefits, protection and duties as an employee, under the Norfolk Island Employment Act. 20081106 Norfolk Island has its own

EARLY CARE & EDUCATION LAW UNIT Publication Date: November 2013 WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT SMALL CLAIMS COURT In the operation of your child care business you may encounter problems which force you to

Financial Series June 2011 Being a Guarantor in Alberta Has someone you know asked you to be a Guarantor? Are you already a Guarantor and worried about what comes next, or what is already occurring? This

HOW TO FIND A LAWYER IN FLORIDA Office of the Staff Judge Advocate, MacDill Air Force Base, Florida (813) 828-4422 WHEN SHOULD I SEE A LAWYER? You've been hurt in a car accident. It's time to draw up a

Wayne Howell, PLLC ANSWERS TO COMMON BANKRUPTCY QUESTIONS A decision to file for bankruptcy should be made only after determining that bankruptcy is the best way to deal with your financial problems. This

The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

20 Essential Legal Tips to Know Before You Hire a Lawyer Ken LaMance, Attorney at Law Copyright 2000-2010 All Rights Reserved Contents Do I need a Lawyer? 1. Define your problem carefully before considering

SOCIAL SECURITY OVERPAYMENTS: RESPONDING TO A NOTICE THAT SAYS YOU HAVE BEEN OVERPAID This document contains general information for educational purposes and should not be construed as legal advice. It

731-04-joel_maloff-phone.com-cloud_based_phone_service Page 1 of 5 Ranked the #1 radio show in the Boston Market in its time-slot, and with more than 5,500,000 Podcast downloads, Tech Talk With Craig Peterson

Why use ADR? Pros & cons Thinking about ADR? This leaflet is for you if you ve heard about alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and are wondering whether to use it to try and resolve a dispute. It will

The Common Denominator of Success by Albert E.N. Gray The common denominator of success --- the secret of success of every man who has ever been successful --- lies in the fact that he formed the habit

Free Legal Consumer Guide Series Brought To You By Meeting All Your Legal Needs For 50 Years 2 How To Handle A Traffic Ticket HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE If you read this guide, you will discover what you need

Code of conduct for Healthcare Support Workers Working to standard: a code of conduct for support workers in health care 1. Introduction 1.1 Welcome to this code of conduct for support workers in health

Trying a Wrongful Death Case: Voir Dire as a Bridge to Summation By: Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan Damages in a wrongful death case are fraught with complex issues and legal challenges. While it is easy

A Guide to the Human Rights Act A booklet for People with Learning Disabilities Human Rights Human Rights Illustrations by CHANGE Picture Bank What s inside This booklet,..................................1

David Crum, Esq. Managing Partner New Mexico Legal Group, P.C. ABOUT THE AUTHOR David Crum, Esq. David Crum is the Managing Partner of New Mexico Legal Group, P.C., an Albuquerque-based criminal defense

Top 7 Social Security Disability Blunders: How Honest Hardworking Texans Destroy Their Entitlement to Social Security Disability Benefits The social security disability assessment system was designed to

INTERACTIVE ETHICS CASE: JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2000 You learn that one of your patients, a 35 year old man, is positive for the HIV virus. He has not yet developed AIDS. He asks you not to tell his wife because