Groups

Activites

I thought I would write a quick progress update on the status of getting LN transactions up again.

I've implemented all of the fixes for the deposits and withdrawals. Theoretically, I could re-enable now. However, I am going to fix up some other aspects as well, which will further improve the safety of funds.

Here is what I am doing:

I am making user tips more robust. Anonymous tips (via LN) now have the same funds safety checks to ensure that the intended user gets the funds.

I am making voting more robust. Again - I am going to ensure proper funds synchronization when a user spends funds on votes as when a user makes a withdraw. Although this part doesn't touch the Lightning Network, I'm going to improve it anyway. In the process, you will notice that voting will be much more ... zippy. This improvement is both a safety and performance improvement.

Once I have these two other improvements complete and tested, I will be turning LN transactions back on.

I've fixed most of the issues on the test version. I am also updating all financial aspects to improve safety. It's going to take a couple more days I think until it is updated and tested to go back online.

How is Bitcoin doing these days? How does bitcoin today compare with Bitcoin of 2017? It seems like a lot has changed. So, here is a quick look I decided to put together.

SegWit

Segregated witness was activated in August 2017. It segregates signature data from transactions into blocks past the 1Mb limit - effectively freeing room in the block for more transactions. It also paved the way for other improvements related to future soft-forks as a way to add new features to Bitcoin without disrupting existing users or requiring everyone to update their software. Let's look at segwit adoption:

Not as good as one would have hoped, but the trend is good. In terms of large (i.e. in value) transactions, Segwit has become the sleight majority. In terms of the number of transactions and block-space used, SegWit is now half of the transactions.

Blocksize

That pesky 1Mb block limit, which can't be removed without a hard fork (and associated risk/split/centralization). How has it changed over the last 5 years?

The solid block around 2018 is when blocks were full - fees were sky-high, and we were witnessing a boom in Bitcoin. The blockchain hit a wall. SegWit was new. That seemed to have resolved, and we can now see that blocksize averages of 1.3Mb are common. The blocksize could still be even higher as not everyone is using SegWit yet.

Fees

What happened to fees over time?

The fee issues leading up to 2018 is clear - but then, it seems to have settled down. It may not stay that low if the demand for transactions goes up, but we are far from the fee issues we had in 2017 and 2018.

Lightning Network

The beta lightning network is still under development, but, it is already very useful. If you are reading this, you've probably enjoyed a few Lightning Network transactions already.

The number of public channels and capacity seems to have reached a plateau. A public capacity of 1000 BTC seems to be the sticky point. Unfortunately (fortunately!), due to the nature of the Lightning Network, we can't see how many transactions are going on. How's that for privacy enhancement? I can say that my lightning node has already conducted almost 130,000 transactions. Yes - that's right 130K! I think I've paid under $1 in routing fees for all of those combined. I also open channels at 1-2 satoshi/byte, so minimal chain fees too.

If we were to have this kind of transaction capacity on the native blockchain, that would take about 52 blocks of space. Also, remember - I am just one of now 12,000 public nodes on the network. I might be among the most active nodes, but I hope that one can see the scaling going on here. At even $0.01 per transaction, that would have cost $1,300 to transact on-chain, likely more.

Keep in mind this is all on a measly 1Mb blockchain.

Summary

I think that Bitcoin is in a pretty good place. There are still things to work on (i.e. keeping fees low), but the future is bright. We are not in a corner, and there are multiple exciting developments in the works. The change that has me most excited is BIPs 340, 341, and 342. These Bitcoin Improvement Proposals add (through soft-fork) Schnorr Signatures, Taproot, and Tapscript. I should do a future post to explain what this gives us in more detail - but I'll say now that it gets me really excited for the future of Bitcoin. I'm talking about privacy, scaling, safety, and powerful smart contracts.

* Note that nowhere in this post did I make any mention of market prices.

If you haven't already noticed, I've updated the financial page and the chat user interface. Again the goal of the update is efficiency.

The next major update to make is the post editor. This one may take some time, and it is a very important part of the site (obviously).

Thanks for your patience the last week as parts of the site were broken. I've probably broken some other things along the way which slipped by the unit testing - so if you notice anything, please let me know!

The limbo is released when LND reports as perma-failed, invoice expires, or it is confirmed paid by LND. I have issues still with their API. Sorry it is not very friendly right now. LND is working on enhancements still. I am conservative with that to keep people from trying to steal funds.

A main difference between the most recent jump compared to 2008 is that in 2008, they were able to actually drop interest rates. Interest rates were already low at the start of this crisis - so not much of a drop there.

Properly binged out after watching all 3. I can see why you like them so much. Kinda interesting watching them now we have Bitcoin. A personal line of enquiry has been very much enhanced ie. American Libertarianism (Right) and the original left/Anarcho Libertarianism... Now i have positive freedom and negative freedom to fit in... Feels like i already have it but i will upset too many Bitcoin Maxi's if i expound. I'm sure you know exactly where I'm going with this @Zelgada‌ Thanks again for the share ;)

Just watched part 1. Superb. Confirmation Bias much? And there was me thinking there's something wrong with me haha.

Profound also, watching it in this present moment. Put this in the context of The Century of the Self and you have many answers. I get off on seeing dissonance in people (a little evil i know), but i really enjoy the feeling of it myself as i know i'm being challenged and learning. Great share Thanks

Not through the first one yet, but it's very interesting to learn that being selfish is always the best strategy (if everyone does it, which is why everyone does it).First 20 minutes were hard, but it gets very interesting after that!

It's a small point, but that's the best strategy for the prisoner's dilemma game. There are other games which may have a different Nash equilibrium. Also iterated prisoner's dilemma is quite interesting!