according to him, we died in a mass extinction event in 2012. Consensus will continue to dissolve as the Nelson Mandela "Effect" intensifies ( ). We are all cymatic echoes or vibrations that are in the afterthought of our extinction.

Of course we didn't die, we shed our lives. We are, after all, deciduous. We shed our lives in the Autumn of our Discontent, and send out new life buds when Hope Springs Eternal. It is an epochal cycle, so most of you aren't around long enough to notice.

. . . with the satisfied air of a man who thinks he has an idea of his own because he has commented on the idea of another . . . - Alexandre Dumas 'The Count of Monte Cristo"

There is no statement so absurd that it has not been uttered by some philosopher. - Cicero

according to him, we died in a mass extinction event in 2012. Consensus will continue to dissolve as the Nelson Mandela "Effect" intensifies ( ). We are all cymatic echoes or vibrations that are in the afterthought of our extinction.

according to him, we died in a mass extinction event in 2012. Consensus will continue to dissolve as the Nelson Mandela "Effect" intensifies ( ). We are all cymatic echoes or vibrations that are in the afterthought of our extinction.

I think he's wrong.

Well, I have a cousin who died on his forklift. Nobody noticed he was dead until they needed him to move something.

according to him, we died in a mass extinction event in 2012. Consensus will continue to dissolve as the Nelson Mandela "Effect" intensifies ( ). We are all cymatic echoes or vibrations that are in the afterthought of our extinction.

I think he's wrong.

I know, I'm just trying to make sense of it. someone can't be that stupid, or can?

sandisk wrote: I'm just trying to make sense of it. someone can't be that stupid, or can they?

You are the anti Evolutionist who doesn't believe humans evolved.........so yes, there are people who are that stupid.

No, I don't believe, I Know it is false. But no effort or my part was required, I was just trying to make sense of it all, until I watch many videos refuting all evolution attempts to prove this lucy,homo namby pamby nonsense

sandisk wrote: I'm just trying to make sense of it. someone can't be that stupid, or can they?

You are the anti Evolutionist who doesn't believe humans evolved.........so yes, there are people who are that stupid.

No, I don't believe, I Know it is false. But no effort or my part was required, I was just trying to make sense of it all, until I watch many videos refuting all evolution attempts to prove this lucy,homo namby pamby nonsense

Matthew Ellard wrote:You are the anti Evolutionist who doesn't believe humans evolved.........so yes, there are people who are that stupid.

sandisk wrote:No, I don't believe, I Know it is false. I was just trying to make sense of it all, until I watch many videos refuting all evolution attempts to prove this lucy,homo namby pamby nonsense

No such science videos exist. Please remember you are an uneducated hippy who posts religious nonsense on our science forum. Understanding the evidence and mechanisms for evolution is for educated people who think things through. For example, when I asked you where you think humans came from, you simply stopped posting. You also claimed you believe in micro evolution, however it is very obvious you haven't got a clue what you actually think micro evolution is, otherwise you would have to agree that normal evolution also is real.

Matthew Ellard wrote:You are the anti Evolutionist who doesn't believe humans evolved.........so yes, there are people who are that stupid.

sandisk wrote:No, I don't believe, I Know it is false. I was just trying to make sense of it all, until I watch many videos refuting all evolution attempts to prove this lucy,homo namby pamby nonsense

No such science videos exist. Please remember you are an uneducated hippy who posts religious nonsense on our science forum. Understanding the evidence and mechanisms for evolution is for educated people who think things through. For example, when I asked you where you think humans came from, you simply stopped posting. You also claimed you believe in micro evolution, however it is very obvious you haven't got a clue what you actually think micro evolution is, otherwise you would have to agree that normal evolution also is real.

you also share 98% of your dna with a banana, are your common ancestors a banana?

No, I actually hate hippies with their hypocrisy Their utopia is as fictional as darwinistic evolution

No, I won't further the discussion there, your questions are based on a fairy tale, I don't need anyone to ask the same stupid questions again that I know are false, It is not only youtube, many websites (just type darwinist evolution hoax and there you have all evidences needed, and even scientists which once were darwinists evolutionists debunked this science fiction bs.

Last edited by sandisk on Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:16 am, edited 2 times in total.

No. You are the hippy hypocrite. You stated you believed in microevolution but could not explain why the same mechanism doesn't allow for macro-evolution. ( Both are just names for normal evolution).

sandisk wrote:No, I won't further the discussion there, your questions are based on a fairy tale,

The overwhelming evidence and scientific mechanisms for evolution are all well known. I studied human evolution at university and personally measured cranial crests on earlier hominids as well as studying organic chemistry.

You lied and said "you know" where humans come from. Well spit it out boy! Where did modern humans come from 195,000 years ago? Did God do it? Did aliens mate with monkeys? Did Ra the reincarnated spirit create man out of clay?

sandisk wrote:I don't need anyone to ask the same stupid questions again that I know are false

Am I disturbing your religious belief system framework? Try re locating to the David Icke forum as it is more for your education level.

No. You are the hippy hypocrite. You stated you believed in microevolution but could not explain why the same mechanism doesn't allow for macro-evolution. ( Both are just names for normal evolution).

sandisk wrote:No, I won't further the discussion there, your questions are based on a fairy tale,

The overwhelming evidence and scientific mechanisms for evolution are all well known. I studied human evolution at university and personally measured cranial crests on earlier hominids as well as studying organic chemistry.

You lied and said "you know" where humans come from. Well spit it out boy! Where did modern humans come from 195,000 years ago? Did God do it? Did aliens mate with monkeys? Did Ra the reincarnated spirit create man out of clay?

sandisk wrote:I don't need anyone to ask the same stupid questions again that I know are false

Am I disturbing your religious belief system framework? Try re locating to the David Icke forum as it is more for your education level.

who said something about god?there is absolutely no god at all.we are the "god", until we are not

sandisk wrote: you also share 98% of your dna with a banana, are your common ancestors a banana?

No. Modern humans do not share 98% of our DNA with a banana. You simply lied. Bananas are photosynthetic plants that produce oxygen. Humans are animals that burn oxygen and have mitochondria.)

Science for schoolsIt is said that we share about 60% of our genes with a banana. But you can see that such a statement can be very misleading. There have been some interesting studies of proteins which ALL organisms share. One of these is Cytochrome C which is involved with part of respiration. The number of different amino acids/mutations between man and other organisms has been extensively studied. Information like this can give a numerical difference between man and other species (including plants).http://www.saps.org.uk/saps-associates/ ... ns-over-99

I did. You deny evolution exists. You cannot state where you think humans came from 195,000 years ago. You don't know anything about DNA, Genetics, Human evolution, organic chemistry, statistics, hominids, pysical evidence, Legacy DNA and so on and so on.

You simply have a religious belief system and you are too embarrassed, on our science forum, to state where you think humans came from.

I did. You deny evolution exists. You cannot state where you think humans came from 195,000 years ago. You don't know anything about DNA, Genetics, Human evolution, organic chemistry, statistics, hominids, pysical evidence, Legacy DNA and so on and so on.

You simply have a religious belief system and you are too embarrassed, on our science forum, to state where you think humans came from.

I did. You deny evolution exists. You cannot state where you think humans came from 195,000 years ago. You don't know anything about DNA, Genetics, Human evolution, organic chemistry, statistics, hominids, pysical evidence, Legacy DNA and so on and so on.

You simply have a religious belief system and you are too embarrassed, on our science forum, to state where you think humans came from.

As we can see from the above post, you are also a blatant liar.

Then, If someone is not "religious", then automatically the person needs to accept a fairy tale? Yeah, right

sandisk wrote: Then, If someone is not "religious", then automatically the person needs to accept a fairy tale?

You really are home schooled aren't you?

If someone is scientific, they can see, review, read peer reviewed papers and replicate all the scientific steps that provide overwhelming evidence that homo sapien evolved from hominids and the hominids separated from our common ancestor with apes, 7 million years ago........that's why we share 98% of our genes with modern apes.

I've been following this. I've come to the conclusion that sandisk is right. His posts provide all of the evidence necessary to call into question the concept of human evolution. He really IS a banana.