Individuals and member organizations of the American media were threatened with FTC and FCC investigation if information gathered by Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse concerning the forgery of Barack Obama’s long form birth certificate were passed on to the American public.

It was Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo who made this stunning revelation, stating “During our investigation, we actually were told [that media] had been threatened with FTC investigations. Commentators [had been] threatened with their jobs.”

And Jerome Corsi, author of “Where’s the birth certificate,” the book whose imminent publication was responsible for forcing Barack Obama to quickly create and place the fraudulent long form birth certificate on the White House web site, has said that “Testimony is being developed that the White House is intimidating, in a systematic way, the mainstream media and if any broadcasters dare go into this birther story, they’re going to risk FCC investigations… people are going to have careers ruined… thrown off the air.”

Actually the issue has been used for political reason and since that judicial decision came down stating that:
A BIT OF PUFFING IS PERMITTED IN POLITICS” our political discourse has deteriorate into slug feast with no substance. This hurts the public and not until the Internet came alive with independent publications did the public got a chance both ways. Accusations going around now are not puffing, under normal discussions some are downright “malicious character assassination” and libelous. A federal investigation of the sources is not an accusation it is a warning that the offended party has a right to determine the source and its reliability. I happen to like that Sheriff but he should know that he should make sure the document is a fraud and such determionation can be done only by official authotities.

No official in Hawaii–—and they are the authorities after all—–has said that there is anything wrong with Obama’s birth certificate or that there is anything different in the published image of it from what they sent to Obama. THREE Republican officials (and several Democrats) in Hawaii have stated in writing that the facts on Obama’s birth certificate are accurate. The fact that Obama was issued a birth certificate in 1961 is further confirmed by the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers in that year.

3) Arpaio’s full video report, to show you a few things to look for. It discusses important evidence of fraud:
(duplicating the demonstrations, with the tools given above, will allow you to do much of the same investigation Arapio’s team did.)

The web is also full of other inconsistencies and evidence of the fraud, mismatched type imported from other documents, mixed, modern day computer type with 1961 typewriter type, etc.

There is little doubt that the birth certificate is a fraud (but, hey, if obama can explain the posting of a fraudulent document to the whitehouse website — and how he became so confused as to think it is his birth certificate, I will listen.) And, one must wonder why a criminal is being allowed to remain in the public servant office of president. There are obvious problems with a criminal occupying the office of president, one is the military being unable to follow unlawful orders, since a criminal issuing orders from the whitehouse, and acting as commander in chief would be unlawful, all of his orders would be unlawful, and the military would be unable to act, lawfully, on such orders.

Also, any and all actions, bill, laws, executive orders, decisions, etc. would be unlawful, illegal, unbinding and without validity — if done by an illegal and criminally treasonous president. As more and more American citizens wake up to these truths, there is only one way to accurately describe the situation we are in, or simply, “WE ARE IN DEEP DUDU!”

And remember, while Angels may have halos, birth certificates DON’T! (you will learn about this while examing the materials, above.)

The following experts say that there is nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, and the State of Hawaii, which is the real expert, certainly hasn’t.

Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said: \ldblquote The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.

Nathan Goulding with The National Review: We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it. \’85 I\rquote ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.

John Woodman, independent computer professional, said in a series of videos that the claims of fakery that he examined were unfounded.

Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily: “All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.”