That cellulose type fibers move on its own is because it are micro organisms that go dormant (pseudo apoptotic) In particular micro organisms that breath and become static because of low metabolism.
During formation they show nerve cell type behavior.

Nerve cell type behavior they will show in particular when they unite as a fiber most resembling a shaft that is related to the mold of the cyanobacterium.

This dominant type gene expression in the form of a semi autonomous and sensing fiber is in fact a break away group cell.
A variant form.

Its character is inbetween plant(cellulose) and insect (chitin)cell.

Single cell micro organisms with an aquired property called quorum sensing will make the organisms act multi cellular.

Hence multi lineage differentiation synonymous with stem cell.
————————————————————————————–
Fast dividing tissue forms a base(culture medium) for this organism.
This type target can only be kept alive and cultered in test animal.
————————————————————————————–

Fibers show inbetween behavior like “plant cell that think they are insect cell”

The agent its intermediate stage resembles a protoplasm.
A transparent cloud with basic properties preserved.

All elements are quorum sensing
All elements differentiate

check: chitin / cellulose wound dressing
TamTam writes in an unusual way. Declarative sentences with little explanation. This reminds me of the way AIs are portrayed in Science Fiction. Or perhaps someone with a brain wired a particular way – maybe Asbergers (not that there’s anything wrong with that, Bill Gates has often been diagnosed with Asbergers).

Which shows text similar to the above, overlaid on footage of some microscopic video.

Interstingly, mainstream Morgellons hits fringe Morgellons when Randy Wymore analyses this video on mogellon.orghttp://morgellons.org/rwupdate.html
He basically says “there is no science here”, but uses several more word, trying to be kind.

Morgellons, have you noticed the way both of them are hailed, though, despite their unusual (albeit quite different), writing styles? Comprehensive skills are lacking in so many people. Odd, isn’t it? One dangles carrots, and gets by with it beautifully, and the other, well, gee, I’m at a loss.

He leaves me at a loss, but the effect he has on morgies is incredible to read. They like to pretend to understand such things for some reason.

“All complaints You make are not at all justified because I give away things that every researcher would keep undisclosed. Be sure that all I show is real and if I would show all at once, reactions could become unpredictable.

I have made first a statement about what we have in front of us, and as it seems people like to complain and discuss things without even watching the video.”

“What You fight is a lenient triangle of academia, medics, pharmaceutical industry, military and booming technology.

All like to know and work on effects of this type pathogen, but nobody will ever mention the facts.
You really think that all money involved to combat disease is used to combat disease?

Basically disease funds research and is also impetus of industry, hence economy.”

“Only if all parameters are specified You can start to conclude.

CDC knows all about this element because I have informed them two times and I simply know that they already knew all about it.

Its a political thing without borders.

According to them the matter should burn out and the rest belongs to statistic.
All type industry will cause victims.”

“Because this target is a thing on its own, you have to start from scrap, decide to invest and screen.
Things like this could already be on its way but You will not hear about it.

Screening is very expensive and to be able to apply for a research budget you first have to invest a considerable amount of money. Proposal is mostly written by more than one scientist.
Next; most research budgets are granted by the Industry.

Now just decide to write a proposal for a non existing disease that later on may prove that the industry cultivates solving effects instead of cause!”

Has anyone else out there noticed these ‘fibers’ inside of their eyes? I have been seeing them literally inside of my eyes for about twenty years now. On a bright, clear day my visual field is literally full of these threads. I wish I could deny this disease away, but there is no other way to explain what I see.

Cellulose wound dressing, Cry9c, PI3-kinase-dependent Bad phosphorylation so on and so on. I find it disturbing that you have a voracious tendancy towards minimizing and avoiding this subject. Is is possible in your opinion, that genetically modifying and combining natural DNA for a single purpose could possibly backfire and create totally different results and unexpected problems? For example, the problem this site is so determined to explain does not exist? Indicating that TamTam created the Silentsuperbug website without any support is more than presumptuous. How did you draw that conclusion?

“have you noticed the way both of them are hailed, though, despite their unusual (albeit quite different), writing styles? Comprehensive skills are lacking in so many people. Odd, isn’t it? One dangles carrots, and gets by with it beautifully, and the other, well, gee, I’m at a loss.”

Do you see any bias or pre-conceived ideas in that comment? or are the floaters obscuring your vision?

Boys, we need to bring a lunch, this is going to take a while. So get used to it.

Norman, if you were only able to see things clearly, you, too, would really be at a loss. Even though I didn’t know how to use blockquote when I made those comments back in April & May, I’d contained some of Tam-Tam’s talk within quotation marks. Anyone familiar with him can surely recognize his words. I was referring to the two people that this topic is about, Tam-Tam and Wymore, not the first two comments that were posted anonymously.

I’ve strived all my life not to be biased, or to hold any preconceived notions, about things. After I examine everything, clearly and concisely, to the very best of my capabilities, I arrive at my conclusions. I own my mistakes when I realize I’m wrong, and I learn from them. That’s how we all grow in our understandings of things, Norm. Now, I don’t really want to cross a line, again, with this, but morgie people proclaim that they’re highly intelligent beings, and that anyone who can’t think on their level is close-minded. Well, I’d better just stop myself short, right there. I’ve been around the block a few times, though, Norman.

“Boys, we need to bring a lunch, this is going to take a while. So get used to it.”

Yes. Recognize, and change what you can, or what you feel you need to, and accept the rest. I’ll do what I can, to try and help while you’re here, but if you have blinders on, with your bias and preconceived fears, there is just no use in it, Norman. If you want communication, now, by all means, open up to it.

Cellulose wound dressing, Cry9c, PI3-kinase-dependent Bad phosphorylation so on and so on. I find it disturbing that you have a voracious tendancy towards minimizing and avoiding this subject. Is is possible in your opinion, that genetically modifying and combining natural DNA for a single purpose could possibly backfire and create totally different results and unexpected problems? For example, the problem this site is so determined to explain does not exist? Indicating that TamTam created the Silentsuperbug website without any support is more than presumptuous. How did you draw that conclusion?

There is no evidence that Morgellons is a distinct disease, or even a well defined syndrome, and hence the speculative discussions of a possible cause are even more irrelevent than they normally would be.