Oorah!

Finally a representative with the stones to stare down islam’s islamists in their deceptively masked faces!

Click image

(Tulsa World) –SALLISAW — State Rep. John Bennett, R-Sallisaw, meeting Monday night with about 85 constituents at a Republican gathering at Western Sizzlin’ here, did not back down from statements he made earlier this month that were critical of Islam.

Bennett has been at the center of a political maelstrom that has gained national attention since he published comments on social media warning people to be wary of Muslim Americans and then refused to apologize in the face of mounting criticism.

Asked before the meeting whether he planned to apologize for his comments, Bennett said, “No. Because I’m right, and they know I’m right.”

“CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) used political pressure to make me back down, but I didn’t and I’m not going to,” he said to a standing ovation.

Click image

Bennett, who served in the U.S. Marines in Iraq and Afghanistan, said he has heard from people all over the world supporting his position.

In a lengthy presentation that included videos made within U.S. mosques, Bennett outlined a history of the Islamic faith and his views that Islam is a sociopolitical movement intent upon destruction of Western civilization and world domination.

“Their goal is the destruction of Western civilization from within,” he said.

“This is a cancer in our nation that needs to be cut out.”
……
He said the FBI has severed ties with CAIR [FACT] in part because the organization was alleged to be an unindicted co-conspirator in a major trial about funding terrorism.

*Holy Land Foundation Check To CAIR

Ibrahim Hooper, communications director of CAIR in Washington, D.C., said the unindicted co-conspirator charge against CAIR was legal “mumbo jumbo” that came out of the *Holy Land Foundation trial in 2007.

Notable facts about CAIR’s pas de deux with Islamic extremism and terrorism include the following:

Co-founder Nihad Awad asserted at a 1994 meeting at Barry University, “I am a supporter of the Hamas movement.” Awad wrote in the Muslim World Monitor that the 1994 trial which had resulted in the conviction of four Islamic fundamentalist terrorists who had perpetrated the previous year’s World Trade Center bombing was “a travesty of justice.”

On February 2, 1995, U.S. Attorney Mary Jo White named CAIR Advisory Board member and New York imam Siraj Wahhaj as one of the “unindicted persons who may be alleged as co-conspirators” in Islamic Group leader Omar Abdel Rahman‘s foiled plot to blow up numerous New York City monuments.

On June 6, 2006, CAIR’s Ohio affiliate held a large fundraiser in honor of Siraj Wahhaj. Following the event, CAIR-Ohio issued a press release heralding the more than $100,000 that Wahhaj had helped raise that evening for the organization’s “civil liberties work.”

In October 1998, CAIR demanded the removal of a Los Angeles billboard describing Osama bin Laden as “the sworn enemy.” According to CAIR, this depiction was “offensive to Muslims.”

In 1998, CAIR denied bin Laden’s responsibility for the two al Qaeda bombings of American embassies in Africa. According to Ibrahim Hooper, the bombings resulted from “misunderstandings of both sides.”

In September 2003, CAIR’s former Community Affairs Director, Bassem Khafagi, pled guilty to three federal counts of bank and visa fraud and agreed to be deported to Egypt. Federal investigators said that a group Khafagi founded, the Islamic Assembly of North America (ISNA), had funneled money to activities supporting terrorism and had published material advocating suicide attacks against the United States. Khafagi’s illegal activities took place while he was employed by CAIR.

In July 2004, Ghassan Elashi, a founding Board member of CAIR’s Texas chapter, was convicted along with his four brothers of having illegally shipped computers from their Dallas-area business, InfoCom Corporation, to Libya and Syria, two designated state sponsors of terrorism. That same month, Elashi was charged with having provided more than $12.4 million to Hamas while he was running HLF (Holy Land foundation). In April 2005, Elashi and two of his brothers were also convicted of knowingly doing business with Hamas operative Mousa Abu Marzook, who was Elashi’s brother-in-law. Elashi’s illegal activities took place while he was employed by CAIR, whose Dallas-Fort Worth chapter depicted the Elashis’ indictment as “a war on Islam and Muslims.”

“Former Europeans who fought against Jihad fought for a number of things: Their religion, their culture and their nation. EU federalists and Eurabians are deliberately suppressing all of these instincts in their quest to create a New Man and weed out aggression. However, because they have wrongly identified the nation state as the root cause of all evil, they are suppressing not just aggressive nationalism, but defensive patriotism. And since some of the Muslims have actually become even more aggressive in response to what they perceive as our nihilism, the Eurabians have suicidally disarmed their own people, literally and metaphorically, and put them up for slaughter.” — Fjordman (Defeating Eurabia)

“The third Jihad started with the oil embargo, the influx of Saudi petrodollars and the beginnings of Eurabia and muslim immigration to the West in the 1960s and early 70s. During the third Jihad, Leftists all over Europe seem to be opening the gates of Europe from within. “You want to conquer Europe? That’s ok. Just vote for us and help us get rid of capitalism and eradicate the Christian heritage of Europe, and we’ll let you in. In the meantime, you can enjoy some welfare goodies, and we will ban opposition to this undertaking as racism and hate speech.”

In one corner we have juvenile lightweight muslim Saba ‘Not Ready for Prime Time‘ Ahmed. A glutton for punishment who is known to bite off more than she can chew while lying through her teeth.

In the other corner we have the fiercely brilliant infidel heavyweight Brigitte “Act For America” Gabriel. Known for not pulling any punches when it comes to islam, chewing up her opponent and spitting her out –again.

(BuzzFeed) –WASHINGTON — The woman at the center of a controversy about Islamophobia, the conservative movement, and the media this week said she’s talking to the Obama administration about a presidential appointment.

Saba Ahmed told BuzzFeed Friday that discussions with the White House over a presidential appointment have been ongoing “for months,” though she declined to say who in the administration she’s spoken with or how serious the conversations are.

“Just like any other American, citizen I’d like to serve my country,” Ahmed said.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Ahmed is a law student at American University, where she is studying patent law. She said she hopes to apply her talents to the patent office. But she said she’s also interested in a presidential appointment in other areas.

“I’m also interested in national security,” she said.

Oh I bet she is.

Ahmed became the center of a media maelstrom earlier this week after she stood up at an event about Benghazi hosted at the Heritage Foundation headquarters that was covered by Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank. Ahmed told Milbank she felt “targeted” by panelists who rejected her contention that the panel was disparaging Islam as dangerous and violent.

On Friday, Ahmed posted to “Exploring Presidential Political Appointments! :-)” to her Facebook page over an image reading “it can take enormous courage to let go of the things that hurt us.” [...]

Sacrificing women on the altar of political correctness. Keep molly coddling the islamic savages [Sweden], and the next thing you know they will be raping your mothers, wives, sisters, daughters and girlfriends right in front of you and/or anyone else who happens by. And it will eventually be against the law to fight back or report the crime. Because that is exactly where you are headed.
Mark. My. Words.

(Fria Tider (Free Times), translated by Frau Katze) –Sweden Democrat Party politician Michael Hess of Karlskrona was sentenced today (May 8, 2014) to a fine for hate speech after having connected the religion of Islam with rape.

According to the judgment, the statement is not part of a “factual and authoritative discussion” and it thus it does not matter whether or not the statement is true.

The indictment concerned a comment on Facebook that Hess wrote next to an article in Aftonbladet, which was about women who were raped in Tahrir Square in Cairo.

“When are you journalists going to realize that it is deeply ingrained in Islamic culture to rape and mistreat those women who do not abide by the teachings of Islam? [Data] is widely available showing the connection between the rapes in Sweden and number of migrants from Middle Eastern and North African countries,” wrote the SD politician.

Hess, who has lived in the Middle East for eleven years, argued that the comment did in fact initiate a debate and persuade journalists to examine the phenomenon more deeply.

As proof of his innocence, Michael Hess including a summary of studies showing that men with ancestry from Muslim countries are very much overrepresented in Swedish rape statistics. This includes official figures from the National Council, which show that men from North Africa and Iraq are involved in rapes 23 and 20 times more often than Swedes.

Fined 32,000 krona

Alderman Lise-Lotte Backstrom and the three Social Democratic jurors at Blekinge District Court, however, took no account of the politician’s objections, and fined him 32,000 krona ($4,900 US) for “hate speech”.

“It is [...] apparent to the court that Michael Hess has meant for readers of his commentary to read the entire statement in the same context and thus readers will get the impression that it is Islamic beliefs that lie behind the rapes when the perpetrators are of Middle Eastern or North African origin. The statement expresses a blatant disrespect towards Islamic immigrants,” reads the judgment.

Hess’s statement is not to be regarded as “part of an objective criticism” and the research that Hess had referred to during the trial is irrelevant.

It does not matter if the statement is true

The court notes that “the question of whether Michael Hess’s statement is true, or at least for Michael Hess appeared to be true, is irrelevant to the proceedings.” The reason is that the SD politician submitted research support after [making the statement on Facebook].

In order for the statement to be classified as “objective criticism” Hess would have had to refer to any relevant research directly in the Facebook post.

“At the time [of the initial statement] , Michael Hess made no reference either to established research or Islamic sources. It is only in connection with his prosecution that he has sought to demonstrate support from research and religious writings. The District Court therefore finds that it is clear that Michael Hess’s statement has not been a part in an objective and authoritative discussion.”

Watch how the cowardly manager runs from the press and sics a guard on them. Guilt is written all over her face.

Questions that immediately come to mind:
Is she hiding something?
Is she protecting someone?
Has she been threatened?
Who owns the complex?
Is resident Duy Tran being singled out?
If so, why?

(KHOU) –WEBSTER, Texas — A Webster man says his apartment complex manager told him his American flag was a “threat to the Muslim community,” and that he has to take it down. But he’s not giving up without a fight. Stepping onto Duy Tran’s balcony in Webster, one thing is clear: “It means a lot to me,” he said. He’s talking about his American flag that he proudly put up when he moved in just a few days ago. But then an apartment manager at the Lodge on El Dorado told him he had to take it down. “What really stunned me is that she said it’s a threat towards the Muslim community,” said Tran. “I’m not a threat toward anybody.” We tried to ask a manager if that’s exactly what was said, but she just handed us a statement, refused to answer any questions, and called an officer to escort us off the property, before we could press any further:

“While the Lodge on El Dorado admires our resident’s patriotism, we must enforce our property rules and guidelines. Such guidelines maintain the aesthetics of our apartment community and provide for the safety of all residents. The apartment community already proudly displays our country’s flag in a safe and appropriate manner at the entrances to our community.” [Zero mention about the "threat to the muslim community" --VH]

But we saw other patriotic symbols hanging from other balconies in the complex, and Tran doesn’t plan to budge. “I’m gonna leave my flag there, as an American, until she shows me proof that I don’t have the right to leave my flag there,” said Tran. To Tran it’s about so much more than stars and stripes. “I have friends that died for this country,” he said. So he says this fight is the least he can do. We have not heard of any residents complaining about any flags at the complex, or any of the patriotic items we saw. In fact, we spoke to several neighbors who say they want Tran’s flag to stay.

She’s right though, the American flag and all it stands for is a threat to the anti-freedom muslim community. Forever may it wave, over the land of the free and the home of the brave.

If this flag offends you, I’ll help you pack.

UPDATE: The apartment complex (The Lodge On El Dorado) has released another statement which also does not address the ‘muslim issue’. They are being eviscerated in the comments.

Oh how I love the smell of a no holds barred cultural jihad smaaaackdown in the morning.
Gabriel launched a stinging non-pc response and put the ‘peaceful’ muslim Saba Ahmed in her place after she had hijacked the discussion on the Obama Regime’s unaccountability regarding the Benghazi attack.
It’s a thing of beauty I tell ya.

SABA AHMED: I know that we portray Islam and all Muslims as bad, but there [are] 1.8 billion Muslims followers of Islam. We have 8 million plus Muslim Americans in this country, and I don’t see them represented here [on the Benghazi panel.]“But my question is how can we fight an ideological war with weapons? How can we ever end this war? The jihadist ideology that you talk about – it’s an ideology. How can we ever end this thing if we don’t address it ideologically?”

BRIGITTE GABRIEL (founder of Act! for America):

What I find so amazing, is that since the beginning of this panel – we are here about the Benghazi attack on our people – not one person mentioned Muslims, or [said] we are here against Islam. We are here because four Americans died and what our government is doing.

We are not here to bash Muslims. You were the one who brought up the issue about ‘most Muslims’ – not us. But since you brought it up, allow me to elaborate with my answer.

There are 1.2 billion Muslims in the world today. Of course not all of them are radicals. The majority of them are peaceful people. The radicals are estimated to be between 15-25% according to all intelligence services around the world.

That leaves 75% of [Muslims being] peaceful people. But when you look at 15-25% of the world’s Muslim population, you’re looking at 180 million to 300 million people dedicated to the destruction of Western civilization. That is as big as the United States.

So why should we worry about the radical 15-25%? Because it is the radicals that kill. Because it is the radicals that behead and massacre.

When you look throughout history, at the lessons of history, most Germans were peaceful. Yet the Nazis drove the agenda. And as a result, 60 million people died, almost 40 million in concentration camps. 6 million were Jews. The peaceful majority were irrelevant.

When you look at Russia, most Russians were peaceful as well. But the Russians were able to kill 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant.

When you look at China for example, most Chinese were peaceful as well. Yet the Chinese were able to kill 70 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant.

When you look at Japan prior to World War II, most Japanese were peaceful people too. Yet, Japan was able to butcher its way across Southeast Asia, killing 12 million people, mostly killed by bayonets and shovels. The peaceful majority were irrelevant.

On September 11th in the United States we had 2.3 million Arab Muslims living in the United States. It took 19 hijackers – 19 radicals – to bring America to its knees, destroy the World Trade Center, attack the Pentagon and kill almost 3000 Americans that day.

So for all our power of reason, and for all us talking about moderate and peaceful Muslims, I’m glad you’re here. But where are the others speaking out?

And since you are the only Muslim representative here, you took the limelight instead of speaking about why our government – I assume you’re an American [Ahmed responded yes.] As an American citizen, you sat in this room, and instead of asking a question about the four Americans that died [in Benghazi] and what our government is doing to correct the problem, you stood there to make a point about peaceful, moderate Muslims.

I wish you had brought ten with you so we could talk about how to hold our government responsible.

“It is time we take political correctness and throw it in the garbage where it belongs.

SABA AHMED: “As a peaceful American Muslim, I’d like to think I’m not that irrelevant. I”m deeply saddened about the lives that were lost in Libya and I hope we will find justice for their families.

But I don’t think this war can ever be won by just the military.

CHRIS PLANTE (talk radio host): “I think everyone agrees that it can’t be won by just the military.” “Can you tell me the head of the Muslim peace movement?”

SABA AHMED: I guess it’s me right now.

Brilliant. Just brilliant.

News flash: ‘Peaceful moderate muslims do not run with radicals.’

Interesting that Ahmed the self-proclaimed; “head of the [oxymoronic] peaceful muslim movement” pals around with violent islamic jihadi terrorist Mohamed Osman Mohamud. And if that was not damning enough, she came to his defense in a most high profile fashion after he was found guilty of plotting to set off a car bomb (WMD) with the intent to commit a mass jihad massacre. If his plan would have been successful, it could have resulted in the slaughter of thousands. Why CAIR has not snapped her up is beyond me.

Saba Ahmed, a friend of the family of Mohamed Osman Mohamud, speaks to the media after Mohamed Osman Mohamud appeared in court on November 29, 2010 in Portland, Oregon. Mohamud, a Somali-born teenager, was arrested and charged with attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction when he allegedly attempted to set off a car bomb during Christmas tree lighting ceremony in Pioneer Courthouse Square in Portland, Oregon. (November 28, 2010 – Source: Craig Mitchelldyer/Getty Images North America)

So, who is Saba Ahmed? It turns out that Ahmed is a “family friend” of Somali-American Mohamed Mohamud, the 19-year-old who in 2010 tried to ignite a car bomb at a Christmas tree lighting in Portland, Oregon.
……Mohamud was found guilty by a jury of attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction and is being held in a federal prison pending sentencing.

This revelation of Ahmed’s friendship makes Gabriel’s question to Ahmed – asking why Ahmed was talking about Muslims, when the panel had gathered to talk about four dead Americans in Benghazi – much more pointed.

I have a question for Saba Ahmed – why are you friends with this violent jihadi?

Yes, Saba do tell. I’ll wait…

Yeah, that’s what I thought.

Sticking your neck out for the ’cause’ resulted in your being exposed for the not-so-peaceful-muslim as you duplicitously claim to be. Can we say orchestrated hijack backfire little miss political jihadist? Yes we can.

Also see this report on Saba Ahmed’s (a not so bright democrat who thinks her homeland of Pakistan is in the Middle East) controversial storied past. Stalking, mental illness and a failed run for congress (Thank God!) –oh my!

Her introduction assertion; “I’m a law student at American University” is not the whole truth.
According to her LinkedIn profile her current position is with the ‘Office of ‘Commissioner of Patents at United States Patent and Trademark Office.’ (May 2014 -Present (2 months) Alexandria, Virginia – Technology Center 2600)
Past positions:

U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Leahy at United States Senate (January 2014–April 2014)

She’s also been active at Occupy rallies denouncing American war efforts. She has made opposition to the American war against terrorism a key part of what she does. And she took to Heritage to hijack a conversation on Benghazi, turning it to her issue, which had not even been a topic of conversation.

And coming: Agent provocateur, political operative, fabricator of death threats, contempt of court and 9/11 truther. What a sweet peaceful muslim peach!

Oregon Tea Party members recognize Saba Ahmed from her many appearances at Occupy Portland rallies, as well as attempts to crash Tea Party rallies. In fact, she was busted fabricating death threats from Tea Party members that caused her to cancel a non-existent event for local Muslims. Naturally, the local press were all to eager to give only her side of the story.

This incident was around the same time that she was making two runs for a Congressional seat – first as a Democrat, and then as a Republican.

Ahmed has a documented history of mental illness and a habit of stalking conservative and Republican web pages and meetings. After Osama Bin Laden’s death in May, Ahmed claimed she had to cancel a fictitious rally in Pioneer Courthouse Square (which she never advertised or got a permit for), falsely asserting that she had received threats on the Oregon Tea Party Facebook page.

……
Saba Ahmed has garnered attention for being friends with Mohammed Osman Mohamud, the Portland Christmas Tree Bomber – so much so that she was removed from his court hearing when the judge charged her with contempt. She is also a 9-11 truther who believes that the Flight 93 crash in Shanksville, PA was staged.

She tends to seek out any opportunity to get in front of microphones and cameras to undermine conservative causes and messages. She has been removed from many Republican events in Oregon as well as Tea Party rallies, and most conservatives recognize her as unwelcome due to her ulterior motives.

So it’s no surprise that when one door closes, she seeks other avenues to project her message – like, for instance, Occupy Portland [...]

(Jerusalem Post) –YouTube has quietly edited a Katy Perry music video, after a petition launched on Change.org, urging the online video streaming company to remove the video.

The petition, claiming that Perry literally burns a symbol representing the Muslim God, Allah, reached 50,000 signatures as of Wednesday. YouTube and Perry’s representatives did not respond to the controversy.

Shazad Iqbal, 22, creator of the petition, posted on Wednesday that the effort had ended in victory, however YouTube remained quiet throughout, even though the petition was directed at them.

“I’m thrilled to let you all know the name of Allah has been removed from the ‘Dark Horse’ video we couldn’t have done it without everyone’s support so I thank each and every one of you deeply, our voices have been heard! God bless you all,” Iqbal wrote.

A close look at the “Dark Horse” video on Perry’s VEVO YouTube channel will not prove much of anything. Although the post date of the music video has not changed (February 20), a detailed observation will show any viewer that something has changed. The symbol has quietly been removed.

The “I Kissed a Girl” singer’s latest single, “Dark Horse,” sparked harsh reactions from the international Muslim community for disrespecting a symbol representing their God, Allah.

The petition launched Tuesday on Change.org is urged supporters of Islam as well as other religions, to ask YouTube to remove the “blasphemous” music video.

Perry portrays an animated representation of Egyptian Queen Cleopatra, and she is seen using her powers to destroy those who oppose her. One character in the video is seen wearing a religious symbol around his neck, who she then zaps into a pile of sand, along with his pendant.

“At 01:15 into the video Dark Horse; a man is shown being burned, whilst wearing a pendant (also burned) forming the word ‘Allah’, which is the Arabic word for God,” says the online petition. [...]

An online petition launched on Tuesday by Muslims around the world demands that Katy Perry’s music video for “Dark Horse,” in which a ‘God’ pendant is seen being burned, be removed from Youtube.

At 1:15 into the video, a man is shown wearing two pendants, one of which says God in Arabic. Perry, who plays a queen-like figure in the video, zaps the man with lightening and he disintegrates into sand; his pendant disappearing with him.

Petitioners argue that the pop diva is meant to symbolize the opposition of God, making the video blasphemous.

The video, which has a cartoonish Ancient Egypt theme, features other nonsensical aspects such as cat-human hybrid as body guards with whom Perry pole dances with, a dog which walks on its hind legs, and Perry eating spicy junk food.

The petition, which has garnered 30,000 signatures so far, says that its support will show that, “that people from different walks of life, different religions and from different parts of the world, agree that the video promotes blasphemy, using the name of God in an irrelevant and distasteful manner would be considered inappropriate by any religion.”
……

Unik Salihu from Sweden said, “I as a Muslim, think this is a disgrace. Does she want to start a war against Muslims? This video is insulting to us and needs to be removed before something happens! (sic).” [...]

Whatever happens, we’re sure the Obama administration will be more than happy to blame another YouTube video and apologize to the Muslim world for our continued wanton disrespect and aggression towards their religion.

Exit questions:
Will Obama denounce Katy for slandering Islam?
Will Obama send in his Sharia brownshirts to arrest Katy for her blasphemous video?
Will Obama protect fan gurl Katy Perry if things heat up?
If muslims go on the warpath and Americans lives are lost, will Obama blame Katy and her video?

FYI Shazad Iqbal, You Tube refused to pull the Innocence of Muslims video at the request of the Obama Regime so I doubt they will listen to a little piss ant like you.