Liveleak.com Rss Feed - Search results for 'admitting'http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=admitting
Search results for 'admitting'Sun, 02 Aug 2015 16:32:28 -0400Liveleakhttp://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/ll2/logo.gifLiveleak.com Rss Feed - Search results for 'admitting'http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=admitting
The Fake War on ISIS: US and Turkey Escalate in SyriaSun, 02 Aug 2015 00:58:29 -0400http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1b0_1438490742
omniradarhttp://journal-neo.org/2015/08/02/the-fake-war-on-isis-us-and-turkey-escalate-in-syria/
02.08.2015 Author: Eric Draitser
It is late July 2015, and the media is abuzz with the news that Turkey will allow US jets to use its bases to bomb Islamic State (ISIS) targets in Syria. There is much talk about how this development is a "game-changer," and how this is a clear escalation of the much ballyhooed, but more fictional than real, US war on ISIS: the terror organization that US intelligence welcomed as a positive development in 2012 in their continued attempts to instigate regime change against the Syrian government led by Bashar al-Assad.
The western public is told that "This is a significant shift...It's a big deal," as a US military official told the Wall Street Journal. What the corporate media fail to mention, however, is the fact that Turkey has been, and continues to be, a central actor in the war in Syria and, consequently, in the development and maintenance of ISIS. So, while Washington waxes poetic about stepping up the fight against the terror group, and lauds the participation of its allies in Ankara, the barely concealed fact is that Turkey is merely further entrenching itself in a war that it has fomented.
Of equal importance is the simple fact that a "war on ISIS" is merely a pretext for Turkey's military engagement in Syria and throughout the region. Not only does Turkey's neo-Ottoman revanchist President Erdogan want to flex his military muscles in order to further the regime change agenda in Syria, he also is using recent tragic events as political and diplomatic cover for waging a new aggressive war against the region's Kurds, especially Turkey's longtime foe the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK).
In this way, Turkey's recent moves should be seen as merely a new phase of its engagement in the regional war that it has helped foment. Contrary to western corporate media talking points, Turkey has not just recently become actively engaged in the conflict; Ankara has merely shifted its strategy and its tactics, moving from covert engagement to overt participation.
Same War, New Phase
The immediate justification for the launching of renewed airstrikes by Turkey and the US is the expansion of the war against ISIS. In the wake of the bombing in Turkey's majority Kurdish town of Suruc, which killed 32 youth activists, the Turkish government has allegedly struck hard against both ISIS and PKK targets. It is against this backdrop that any analysis of the new phase of this war must be presented.
First and foremost is the fact that even if one were to accept the Turkish government's official story - the suicide bomber was linked to the Islamic State (ISIS) - not at all a certainty, the question of ultimate responsibility becomes central. While Ankara would have the world believe that its hands are clean, and that it is the innocent victim of international terrorism, the reality is that Turkey has done everything to foster and promote the growth of ISIS from the very beginning. As such, it is the Turkish government who must shoulder much of the blame for the Suruc bombing.
Since at least 2012, Turkey has been the principal conduit for weapons flowing into Syria. In June of that year, the NY Times confirmed that the CIA was smuggling weapons to anti-Assad forces from the Turkish side of the border using agents of the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood, long-time assets of US intelligence. Also in 2012, Reuters revealed that Turkey had "set up a secret base with allies Saudi Arabia and Qatar to direct vital military and communications aid to Syria's rebels from a city near the border... 'It's the Turks who are militarily controlling it. Turkey is the main coordinator/facilitator. Think of a triangle, with Turkey at the top and Saudi Arabia and Qatar at the bottom,' said a Doha-based source."
It is now also documented fact that Turkish intelligence (MIT) has been an active player in the ongoing campaign to arm and resupply the terror groups such as the al Nusra Front and others. The evidence of this fact was made public by the Turkish daily Cumhuriyet which published video footage along with transcripts from wiretaps confirming what many eyewitnesses have stated: Turkish security forces have been directly involved in shelling and support operations for Nusra front and other jihadi groups in and around Kassab, Syria, among other sites. Many of the very same terrorists who have been armed and supported by the Turkish government are today being held up as enemies of Turkey, and rationalization of the need for Turkish military intervention.
So, with the inescapable understanding that Turkey's government is the primary supporter and sponsor of terrorist groups in Syria, the justification for war becomes flimsy at best. But, if it's not about fighting terror, then what exactly is Ankara's objective? What does it hope to gain?
At the top of Erdogan's agenda is using ISIS as a pretext for effecting the regime change in Syria that he has failed to bring about for these past four years. Despite providing weapons and cash, training sites and political cover, Turkey's terror proxies have been roundly defeated by the Syrian Arab Army, Hezbollah, and allied forces. As such, Erdogan now needs to provide the overwhelming military superiority required to get the job done. This means air support and a "No Fly Zone" along the Turkey-Syria border, one which ostensibly will allow Turkey to fight ISIS, but in actuality is a means of securing territory for the terrorists who otherwise have been unable to do so. It is a de facto military intervention into Syria. Perhaps not even de facto, but outright declaration of war - a clear war crime.
Secondly, the alleged war on ISIS is a politically expedient cover for Erdogan to wage a full-scale war on the Kurds, and the PKK specifically. Within hours of announcing the new phase of the war, Turkish forces were bombing Kurdish targets in Syria and Iraq, effectively declaring war on both countries, in blatant violation of international law, to whatever extent such a thing still exists. Indeed, Erdogan made his position quite clear when he stated, "It is not possible for us to continue the peace process with those who threaten our national unity and brotherhood." Essentially, Erdogan has declared war on all Kurds of the region.
Perhaps most important, and almost never discussed in the West, is the simple fact that Turkey is perpetuating an outright myth in their supposed strategy to create "Islamic State-free zones" along the border; Turkey plans to work with "moderate opposition" and "Free Syrian Army" in this endeavor. However, the fact remains that there is really no such thing as the "moderates," and those terrorists that had at one time been labeled such have all either gone home, fled the country, gone over to the Al Qaeda-affiliated Nusra Front, or are now fighting under the ISIS banner. And so, by stating such a plan, Erdogan is unwittingly admitting what this author has already reported numerous times - Turkey acts as military muscle for ISIS and al Qaeda in Syria and now Iraq.
But of course, were Turkey the only relevant party, these developments would not be of nearly the same global significance. Rather, it is the participation and collusion of the US and NATO that makes this troubling escalation far more dangerous.
Making Overt the Covert War
As of writing, NATO has not yet been convened to discuss Turkey's war on Syria and the Kurds, though Ankara has called for the meeting under Article 4 of the NATO treaty which provides for consultation, but not necessarily collaborative military action. However, regardless of how the meeting proceeds, Turkey has been given overt support in its war by the US, which is, in effect, NATO.
Although the US feigns concern for the Kurds and the expansion of the war, Washington has in fact endorsed Turkey's policy. White House spokesman Alistair Baskey noted that the US "strongly condemns" recent attacks by the PKK, reiterating the fact that Turkey is an important US and NATO ally. As Obama's close adviser on national security matters Ben Rhodes stated, "The US, of course, recognises the PKK specifically as a terrorist organisation. And, so, again Turkey has a right to take action related to terrorist targets."
While it would appear that Washington is taking a measured approach, cautiously supporting Turkey while trying to limit the scope of the operation, that illusion is merely for appearance's sake. In fact, the Brookings Institution just last month issued a policy paper entitled Deconstructing Syria: Towards a regionalized strategy for a confederal country, which brazenly laid out a plan to, as political analyst Tony Cartalucci astutely pointed out, "divide, destroy, then incrementally occupy" Syria using the pretext of ISIS and terrorism. And that is precisely what we're witnessing now.
But neither Cartalucci, nor this author, nor any other colleagues who have predicted this turn of events are clairvoyant. Rather, this development was very much expected. As noted above, those terrorists who now provide the rationale for a new war were the very same ones openly supported by the countries now waging the war. It was clear at the time that this would be their ultimate role. Sadly, the world has not effectively mobilized to stop this imperialist war thus far.
The question remains: will Syria survive? The answer depends on the continued resolve of the Syrian Arab Army and its allies, and on the global Resistance's capacity to organize itself to effectively oppose the Empire in Syria and beyond.
Eric Draitser is an independent geopolitical analyst based in New York City, he is the founder of StopImperialism.org and OP-ed columnist for RT, exclusively for the online magazine http://journal-neo.org/http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1b0_1438490742omniradarThe Fake War on ISIS: US and Turkey Escalate in SyriaSyria. Ukraine, USAID. CIA. Crown Corps. McCain. Cameron. Paedo,s. Rita Katz. SITE. Green Screens. NED Is a CIA Front. No Wonder Russia Shut It Down!!!Fri, 31 Jul 2015 05:44:01 -0400http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=02f_1438335417
flying_tankSource:
http://russia-insider.com/en/why-russia-shut-down-ned-fronts/ri9049
Despite what Washington Post who gave space to its President would have you believe Founded by the CIA, funded by US Congress and headed by a neocon the National Endowment for Democracy was an instrument of a regime-change-minded foreign government This article originally appeared at Consortium News
The Washington Post's descent into the depths of neoconservative propaganda - willfully misleading its readers on matters of grave importance - apparently knows no bounds as was demonstrated with two deceptive articles regarding Russian President Vladimir Putin and why his government is cracking down on "foreign agents."
If you read the Post's editorial on Wednesday and a companion op-ed by National Endowment for Democracy President Carl Gershman, you would have been led to believe that Putin is delusional, paranoid and "power mad" in his concern that outside money funneled into non-governmental organizations represents a threat to Russian sovereignty.
The Post and Gershman were especially outraged that the Russians have enacted laws requiring NGOs financed from abroad and seeking to influence Russian policies to register as "foreign agents" - and that one of the first funding operations to fall prey to these tightened rules was Gershman's NED.
The Post's editors wrote that Putin's "latest move, announced Tuesday, is to declare the NED an 'undesirable' organization under the terms of a law that Mr. Putin signed in May. The law bans groups from abroad who are deemed a 'threat to the foundations of the constitutional system of the Russian Federation, its defense capabilities and its national security.'
"The charge against the NED is patently ridiculous. The NED's grantees in Russia last year ran the gamut of civil society.
They advocated transparency in public affairs, fought corruption and promoted human rights, freedom of information and freedom of association, among other things. All these activities make for a healthy democracy but are seen as threatening from the Kremlin's ramparts. ...
"The new law on 'undesirables' comes in addition to one signed in 2012 that gave authorities the power to declare organizations 'foreign agents' if they engaged in any kind of politics and receive money from abroad. The designation, from the Stalin era, implies espionage."
But there are several salient facts that the Post's editors surely know but don't want you to know. The first is that NED is a U.S. government-funded organization created in 1983 to do what the Central Intelligence Agency previously had done in financing organizations inside target countries to advance U.S. policy interests and, if needed, help in "regime change."
The secret hand behind NED's creation was CIA Director William J. Casey who worked with senior CIA covert operation specialist Walter Raymond Jr. to establish NED in 1983. Casey - from the CIA - and Raymond - from his assignment inside President Ronald Reagan's National Security Council - focused on creating a funding mechanism to support groups inside foreign countries that would engage in propaganda and political action that the CIA had historically organized and paid for covertly. To partially replace that CIA role, the idea emerged for a congressionally funded entity that would serve as a conduit for this money.
But Casey recognized the need to hide the strings being pulled by the CIA. "Obviously we here should not get out front in the development of such an organization, nor should we appear to be a sponsor or advocate," Casey said in one undated letter to then-White House counselor Edwin Meese III - as Casey urged creation of a "National Endowment."
NED Is Born
The National Endowment for Democracy took shape in late 1983 as Congress decided to also set aside pots of money - within NED - for the Republican and Democratic parties and for organized labor, creating enough bipartisan largesse that passage was assured.
But some in Congress thought it was important to wall the NED off from any association with the CIA, so a provision was included to bar the participation of any current or former CIA official, according to one congressional aide who helped write the legislation.
This aide told me that one night late in the 1983 session, as the bill was about to go to the House floor, the CIA's congressional liaison came pounding at the door to the office of Rep. Dante Fascell, a senior Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee and a chief sponsor of the bill.
The frantic CIA official conveyed a single message from CIA Director Casey: the language barring the participation of CIA personnel must be struck from the bill, the aide recalled, noting that Fascell consented, not fully recognizing the significance of the demand.
The aide said Fascell also consented to the Reagan administration's choice of Carl Gershman to head the National Endowment for Democracy, again not recognizing how this decision would affect the future of the new entity and American foreign policy. Gershman, who had followed the classic neoconservative path from youthful socialism to fierce anticommunism, became NED's first (and, to this day, only) president.
Though NED is technically independent of U.S. foreign policy, Gershman in the early years coordinated decisions on grants with Raymond at the NSC. For instance, on Jan. 2, 1985, Raymond wrote to two NSC Asian experts that "Carl Gershman has called concerning a possible grant to the Chinese Alliance for Democracy (CAD). I am concerned about the political dimension to this request. We should not find ourselves in a position where we have to respond to pressure, but this request poses a real problem to Carl."
Currently, Gershman's NED dispenses more than $100 million a year in U.S. government funds to various NGOs, media outlets and activists around the world. The NED also has found itself in the middle of political destabilization campaigns against governments that have gotten on the wrong side of U.S. foreign policy.
For instance, prior to the February 2014 coup in Ukraine, overthrowing elected President Viktor Yanukovych and installing an anti-Russian regime in Kiev, NED was funding scores of projects.
A second point left out of the Post's editorial was the fact that Gershman took a personal hand in the Ukraine crisis and recognized it as an interim step toward regime change in Moscow. On Sept. 26, 2013, Gershman published an op-ed in the Washington Post that called Ukraine "the biggest prize" and explained how pulling it into the Western camp could contribute to the ultimate defeat of Russian President Putin.
"Ukraine's choice to join Europe will accelerate the demise of the ideology of Russian imperialism that Putin represents," Gershman wrote.
"Russians, too, face a choice, and Putin may find himself on the losing end not just in the near abroad but within Russia itself."
In other words, NED is a U.S. government-financed entity that has set its sights on ousting Russia's current government.
A third point that the Post ignored is that the Russian law requiring outside-funded political organizations to register as "foreign agents" was modeled on a U.S. law, the Foreign Agent Registration Act. In other words, the U.S. government also requires individuals and entities working for foreign interests and seeking to influence U.S. policies to disclose those relationships with the U.S. Justice Department or face prison.
If the Post's editors had included any or all of these three relevant factors, you would have come away with a more balanced understanding of why Russia is acting as it is. You might still object but at least you would be aware of the full story. By concealing all three points, the Post's editors were tricking you and other readers into accepting a propagandistic viewpoint - that the Russian actions were crazy and that Putin was, according to the Post's headline, "power mad."
Gershman's Op-Ed
But you might think that Gershman would at least acknowledge some of these points in his Post op-ed, surely admitting that NED is financed by the U.S. government. But Gershman didn't. He simply portrayed Russia's actions as despicable and desperate.
"Russia's newest anti-NGO law, under which the National Endowment for Democracy on Tuesday was declared an "undesirable organization" prohibited from operating in Russia, is the latest evidence that the regime of President Vladimir Putin faces a worsening crisis of political legitimacy," Gershman wrote, adding:
"This is the context in which Russia has passed the law prohibiting Russian democrats from getting any international assistance to promote freedom of expression, the rule of law and a democratic political system. Significantly, democrats have not backed down.
They have not been deterred by the criminal penalties contained in the 'foreign agents' law and other repressive laws. They know that these laws contradict international law, which allows for such aid, and that the laws are meant to block a better future for Russia."
The reference to how a "foreign agents" registration law conflicts with international law might have been a good place for Gershman to explain why what is good for the goose in the United States isn't good for the gander in Russia. But hypocrisy is a hard thing to rationalize and would have undermined the propagandistic impact of the op-ed.
So would an acknowledgement of where NED's money comes from. How many governments would allow a hostile foreign power to sponsor politicians and civic organizations whose mission is to undermine and overthrow the existing government and put in someone who would be compliant to that foreign power?
Not surprisingly, Gershman couldn't find the space to include any balance in his op-ed - and the Post's editors didn't insist on any.http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=02f_1438335417flying_tankNED Is a CIA Front. No Wonder Russia Shut It Down!!!NED,Is,a,CIA,FrontThe Invisible WarWed, 22 Jul 2015 17:32:12 -0400http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c7f_1437599973
CernunnosKai Murros on the Nationalist Revolution Kai Murros is a man who, unlike many other Nationalists, understands Europeans are currently at war, and have actually been at war for decades now.
No war has actually been declared, as this is an unconventional war. This war is both psychological and physical in nature.
Psychologically, our enemies pursue a policy of demoralization. Their weapons are guilt, shame, and self-hatred, which they carefully cultivate through mass media, entertainment, and revisionist history.
Europeans are painted as the root of all evil, maniacal colonialists and imperialists who spread violence, hatred, and misery throughout the world.
This guilt, shame, and self-hatred has been internalized by the weak-minded among us, who by no fault of their own, have been manipulated into believing the lies and fairy-tales that our enemies feed them.
The physical war that is being waged against Europeans is made possible by the success of the enemy's psychological war.
By instilling guilt, shame, and self-hatred in the masses, Europeans have willingly accepted tens of millions of hostile invaders into their territories. They have not resisted this physical war, this stealth invasion, because they have been taught that to do so would be "racist".
They have been programmed into believing that the natural order of the world is immoral, and that group conflict, ethnic tension, and the Darwinian competition for resources does not apply to Europe's postmodern, multicultural society.
So even as the European masses have seen with their own two eyes the logical conclusion of multi-ethnic, multicultural nations, they have deluded themselves into believing that it could never happen to them.
Indeed, the bloody fate of "multicultural" nations such as Iraq, Yugoslavia, and the Ukraine has not seemed to enlightened the postmodern European. They have failed to learn the lesson that, absent a strong ruler who governs with an iron first, multicultural nations will eventually Balkanize along ethnic or religious lines.
Moreover, their lack of critical thinking faculties, resulting from the compromised "education" systems which have been infiltrated by our enemies, blinds them to the fact that France, Britain, Germany, Sweden, and other Western European nations WILL Balkanize along ethnic and religious lines in the near future.
The ultra-liberal, politically correct establishment sees the writing on the wall, but by admitting that their policies of mass immigration, multiculturalism, and radical egalitarianism have created the conditions for civil war would be political suicide.
In addition, the establishment understands that the forces who are aligning to replace them will hold them accountable for their treason. Admitting their mistakes and committing political suicide, making way for the Nationalist tsunami, will result in the gallows or the guillotine for the political elite who have constructed the multicultural nightmare in Europe.
As such, Europe's current political class cannot admit that Europe is at war, unlike the Nationalists, who have concluded that Europe is at war and have identified the enemies.
Admitting that Europe is at war with their imported masses of Islamic invaders would be the final nail in the coffin of the left. Therefore, this war will continue on, unacknowledged by the political elite, but it will continue to affect the European masses each and every day.
To the growing ranks of awakened Europeans, this is a war that cannot, and will not, be lost. This war will be the war to end all wars, a war of reconciliation in which the nations of Europe will band together for the first time to eliminate the common threats of Islam and Marxism.
Mr. Murros understands full well what the future holds for Europe, and in the next section I will discuss his thoughts on the coming Nationalist Revolution that will sweep through Europe and cleanse the continent of our enemies.
Murros on the Nationalist Revolution
In his Youtube video, titled "National Revolution - Turn on, Tune In, Take Over", Murros objectively analyzes the current situation in Europe, while projecting the ramifications of the inevitable conflict that will shake the foundations of Europe.
In this post, I will be covering the first half of his lecture, while I will be covering the second half in my next post, as there is a lot of material to cover.
Speaking about the undeclared war raging in Europe, Murros states:
"This war is fought every day and it affects every aspect of our lives. This war is fought in the media, as our elite pollutes our minds with shameless lies, trying to make us accept unconditional surrender in the face of rampant masses swarming to Europe. This war is fought in the academic world, as the malicious, perverted intellectuals who preach self-hatred and guilt are seducing us to welcome death and extinction, in order to make room for the ever-swelling masses of hostile aliens. This war is fought in the bloody confrontations in our streets and town squares, as our people are being attacked by gangs of predatory immigrants waging an open race war against us."
"This war may have escaped the attention of the liberals. The leftists may deny that there is any war at all. But this war is a gruesome reality that affects us all, whether we accept to see it or not. Those who think they don't have to get involved, who believe that they can turn their backs to all this, pretend that nothing is happening and stay neutral, are already in this mess just as deep as the rest of us."
Murros is correct in his analysis that the liberals are in this mess as deep as the rest of us, but it should be noted that the liberals have tucked themselves away in exclusive enclaves, far removed from the misery and chaos they have imported into working-class communities.
Most midde- and upper-class liberals are living in a bubble, unaware that Europe is in the process of a hostile invasion. This explains their lack of urgency and outright denial of the fact that a clash of civilizations is imminent.
With that being said, patriots mustn't assume that these soft, coddled, beta-leftists will ever "wake up" and join the resistance. In fact, I suspect that they would be more likely to side with the invaders over the indigenous Europeans when the actual conflict begins.
The working-classes are not living inside of a bubble, they are on the front lines of Islamic barbarity. They can no longer afford to project airs of moral superiority and disingenuous leftist dogma.
They have been forced to face the reality of the situation, while their leftist overlords condemn them as "racists" for so much as mentioning that their neighborhoods are turning into third-world concrete jungles.
Murros on the Pan-European Response to This War
After acknowledging the fact that Europe is in a state of war, Murros goes on to describe the implications of this war:
"We will learn to pool our resources, synchronize our action, sharpen our wits, and organize ourselves to such a degree that when we finally make our decisive move in this great game, we will act as one and we will strike with such force, and move with such speed, that the world will hold its breath. The evolutionary struggle between civilizations is far from over, and if there is one thing absolutely certain in this world, it is that Europe will not perish."
"Facing death and destruction together will unite us in a way that has not yet been seen in our long history. How could anyone defeat Europe when we, for the first time in history, stand together? As we rediscover our strength, we will turn our gaze on our enemies, and we will come to the realization that indeed, there are bigger fish to fry in this world than our past squabbles."
"The irony is that when we finally get Europeans to fight, we have already won the war. And this is because our biggest enemy, in the end, is not the alien mob occupying our streets, but our unwillingness to do anything about it."
I believe that Murros is correct on all points. For the first time in Europe's history, Nationalists and patriots from all across Europe, as well as Europeans residing in Europe's colonial outposts, are coming together as one to defend our home continent and the survival of our people.
Those who truly understand what is happening to Europe are completely aware of what is at stake.
England is dying a slow death as New Labour's army of immigrants is leading to a demographic winter. London was the first domino to fall, as the English are now a minority in their own capital city. Birmingham will be next, and Bradford is close behind.
France is also dying a slow death, as Islamic extremists are colonizing the suburbs of Paris. France's second-largest city, the ancient city of Marseille is now between 30-40% Muslim and Frenchmen will soon be a minority in that territory.
Germany, Italy, Ireland, and Sweden, among others, are facing the same fate. The European left's seemingly endless arsenal of "diversity bombs" has left many areas of Europe unrecognizable and has opened the pandora's box of ethnic Nationalism, the left's worst nightmare.
Conclusion
For those Europeans who have the sense to acknowledge that you are at war, it is imperative to make preparations now so you are prepared if (and when) the battles for Europe's survival begin.
I would recommend that all European Nationalists study Sun Tzu's The Art of War , as it is an instructive manual that can be utilized in both the political and military sphere.
It will also be important to establish international networks, both within Europe and abroad, to share information, strategies, resources, and expertise.
And although a political solution is preferable, it is becoming less likely by the day, as the EUSSR is attempting to speed up their facilitated invasion in order to build up their forces for the coming elections (and battles).
Remember, wherever Islam has ever laid down roots, it has sought to conquer. As British Rear Admiral Chris Parry has noted :
"If you look at the maps put out by the Islamic State, it is pretty clear what they want back. Italy, Spain. They want back what they once had. Islam is a very territorial religion."
It has already been established that Italy and Greece's immigration systems are close to collapse, as the barbaric masses of North Africa and sub-Saharan Africa descend on the Mediterranean lands.
Moreover, Bulgaria's Prime Minister remarked today that mass Muslim immigration is threatening the demographic balance of Bulgaria's Slavic, Orthodox Christian nation , as illegal Islamic immigrants from Turkey flood across Bulgaria's border.
As you can see, Europeans who are not living in a bubble can no longer afford to be reactive. It is time to be proactive. The demographic winter is fast approaching, and once a critical mass of invaders is reached, you will cease to be the masters of your own destiny.
In closing, I would like to remind European patriots that the invaders occupying your territory did not just appear out of nowhere. The invaders did not set your immigration policy.
They are just a symptom of a much larger problem, namely unconstrained liberalism and the traitors who have imposed this destructive ideology on all European nations.
The presence of tens of millions of invaders on your continent should be a reminder of the treasonous elite who have invited them into your lands, without ever asking your permission.
Their end goal is to destroy all notions of national identity and patriotism. They want a mass of ignorant, docile masses who will pledge loyalty to their corporate brands, rather than to their tribes, cultures, and civilization.
Regardless of the odds and regardless of the circumstances, you must never allow this to happen.
Always keep in mind the sacrifices made by your ancestors who valiantly fought back the Mongols, Huns, Ottomans, and Communists throughout the years.
Each generation of Europeans has fought for the survival of their territory, with the exception of the traitorous 68ers.
The onus now falls on this new generation of Europeans, freed from the chains of Marxism and political correctness, to defend their territory against the 68ers and their imported army of barbarians.
Murros also covered the pan-European nature of the resistance movements coalescing to defend Europe against the threats to its survival.
In this article, I will be covering the second half of Murros' lecture, which focuses on the state of the ruling liberal elite, their allies in global capitalism and international finance, as well as his analysis of Europe's eventual triumph in the face of these formidable enemies.
Murros on the Liberal Elite
"We are dreamers and visionaries, while the liberals have become tired and scared. The liberals have lost the ability to dream and to evoke great emotions. All the liberals can do is to administer this ever-growing misery and desperately cling on to the remnants of their waning power. All that the liberals have left is the past and the crumbling illusion of being in control. All the liberals can give to people is threats, threats of what will happen if people do not obey and yield to the demands of the elite."
"Our dreams are nightmares to our enemies. We are believers and our enemies are left with desperation. We have faith, they will have fear. No matter how the liberals will try to deny it, we already are in their nightmares. No matter how they try to resist, deep down they already see their own demise. Uneasiness turns into worry, and worry into full-blown panic. The liberals can already see this path before them"
"When the liberals try to warn people about us, they always paint a picture of a sinister, relentless, and cunning movement. A force of nature that feeds on the turmoil, desperation, anger, and hardship the liberals themselves have brought about, but cannot cure. In short, the liberals subconsciously already admit that they are the disease and we are the cure."
Indeed, the liberals are most certainly the disease that has stricken Western Civilization since their ascendancy in the 1960s. With the help of the masses of useful idiots from the baby boomer generation, the Marxist beast has gained control of our institutions, governments, media outlets, and universities.
The introduction of liberalism (Marxism) into the Christian West has turned our societies upside down.
Our popular culture was transformed from family-friendly, wholesome positivity, into filth, degeneracy, and debauchery. "My Girl" and "Leave it to Beaver" has given way to "Niggas Wit Attitudes" and "Jersey Shore".
The "tolerant" liberals have unleashed a torrent of depravity onto the masses and sold it as "hip" and "cool". They push sex, filth, and violence in their media outlets to spiritually weaken those who have embraced their lowbrow pop culture, which has consumed the minds of the dim-witted, unsuspecting populace.
Rather than celebrating artistic talent, musical ability, and cinematic genius, the liberal elite urges the masses to celebrate vile art performed by freakish jesters such as Lady Gaga, Nicky Minaj, and Rihanna.
And instead of instilling virtuous values in the masses, they instill twisted values such as "money over bitches", "YOLO", and "cash rules everything around me". As a result, a majority of Western youth are unequivocally materialist, hyper-sexualized, and consumed with the pursuit of wealth and fame.
Those who have resisted this nihilistic cultural nightmare are considered alienated outcasts in the eyes of the hypnotized masses, blind to the fact that us outcasts view them as imbeciles, stooges, and pawns. This blindness will leave them astonished when this permissive, debased society is overthrown by a counter-culture that insists on virtuosity, traditional values, and a return to normalcy.
But popular culture isn't the only aspect of Western society that has been compromised by the poisonous doctrine of liberalism. In fact, liberalism's most important achievement has been breakdown of the family unit.
This breakdown of the family unit has allowed the Cultural Marxist poison to infiltrate the pop culture of our youth, and has served to strengthen the state at the expense of the family.
In Europe's case, the Cultural Marxists have successfully manipulated the masses into believing that the world is overpopulated and that those who have large families are "selfish".
Meanwhile, the Marxist elite has used the pretext of declining European birthrates to import foreigners to replace them in their own lands, while subsidizing large immigrant families with European taxpayer funds .
This hypocrisy is blatant and devious, as you have a hostile elite urging Europeans to have small families, while actively importing third-world foreigners into Europe from nations with astronomical birthrates.
When you dig deep and realize that the end goal of this contradiction is the demographic replacement of the European peoples, the reasoning behind the Marxist elite's hypocritical stance becomes crystal clear.
In America's case, the introduction of the "Great Society" welfare-state has rendered the bread-winning father unnecessary. When the state can provide you food, housing, health care, schooling, and even "Obama phone", women are no longer required to ensure that fathers stick around to care for their children.
As such, the communities most affected by welfare-state dependency, particularly the black American community, are characterized by ignorance, violence, chaos, and disorder.
Fatherless boys find their father figures in gangs, while fatherless girls are incentivized to "game the system" and continue the legacy of dependency their mothers have taught them.
Nevertheless, Europeans have consistently elected leftists for decades, while Americans have done the same (with the exception of Reagan).
The liberals are hesitant to take ownership of the post-60s moral and spiritual collapse of the West, but they have unquestionably been the bearers of nation- and family-wrecking, decadence, filth, and the decline of civil society.
As a result of their destructive policies, their reign of terror will soon come to an end, and those responsible will be held accountable for their treachery.
Murros on the Implications of the Nationalist Revolution
"What must be done, will be done, so that Europe can live. In the end, seemingly against all odds and to the horror of the powers-that-be, Europe endures, Europe survives, and Europe triumphs. Europe will be mercilessly purified and purged, and not a stone will be left unturned in order to find the criminals responsible for the debasement of our civilization."
"Europe's answer to external threats is not defense, but outrageous expansion. We will not sit idly by and wait to be over-ridden by barbarians. We will carry the war into enemy territory."
"We place our hope in the young people of Europe. The new European youth will forsake the obsolete and stifling values they have been force-fed by the decaying society. The new youth will cast off all the wrong teachings, false dogmas, and lies the degenerating system has used to brainwash them. The new youth will ferociously pursue European interests on a world scale. We will not be insulted anymore. We will not be pushed around anymore, and we will not be abused anymore."
Murros' insistence that Europe will ultimately triumph and that the Nationalist victors will uncover every stone to expose the traitors in our midst should be noted.
Throughout history, Europe has faced many threats that have been much more potent than today's ruling authoritarian left, which relies on deceit, censorship, and political correctness to maintain its position of power.
Following the collapse of Rome, Europeans fought back many threats who were much more potent than the weak, emasculated, beta-leftist enemy we are facing today.
In the eighth century A.D., the European peoples of the Iberian Peninsula were conquered by savage Islamic beasts , who ruled over them for centuries. The brave and noble Iberians fought this foreign rule for almost 800 years, before completing the Reconquista in 1492, banishing all Muslims from Iberian lands. In the thirteenth century A.D., Eastern and Central Europeans fought back the Asiatic Mongol invaders , some of the most ferocious, barbaric, and effective warriors the world has ever seen. This was not the first time Europe had fought back barbaric Asiatic invaders, as the Attila and his army of Huns had already been pushed out of Europe centuries prior to the Mongol invasions. In the fourteenth century A.D., the black death struck Europe and decimated between 30-60% of Europe's population. This opened up many European territories to invasion at the hands of the Islamic Ottoman Empire , whose forces were not banished from Europe until the 20th century.
As you can see, Europeans have always resisted hostile invasions of their territory.
The current "stealth invasion" has been unlike all other invasions, as it is an undeclared invasion facilitated by the leftist elite, who have imported a Trojan Horse, a hostile fifth column, into Europe, consisting of tens of millions of their pet "migrants".
However, the peoples of Europe have awakened to the true nature and scale of this facilitated invasion, and are turning to Nationalists to neutralize the invaders. The people understand that it is only the Nationalists who possess the will, tenacity, and loyalty to take up this monumental task.
And this task WILL be carried out, whether it be by peaceful means or violent means. The methods utilized to repel this invasion and expel the invaders from Europe will be up to the invaders themselves.
They can either peacefully exit European lands and return to their homes, peacefully submit to deportation proceedings, or decide to take up arms against the most powerful warriors to ever walk the earth.
I sincerely hope that the invading forces choose the former, because if they choose the latter, it is likely that many lives will be lost, and that is a situation that should be avoided unless absolutely necessary.
Conclusion
The coming Nationalist Revolution in Europe will mark a new era in European history. This epoch of subversive and treasonous Communism, Marxism, and liberalism will give way to patriotism, renewal, and renaissance.
Europeans will re-discover that they have a destiny to fulfill, a destiny which is distinct from the destiny of all other groups.
Europeans will also re-discover the forces which have propelled our civilization to heights never before seen in any other civilization.
In the spirit of Galileo and Copernicus, they will value absolute truth, rather than the deceptive distortions of reality pushed by the leftists. In the spirit of Darwin, they will accept the intractable laws of nature, rather than the denial of biological truths and human nature propagated by the leftists.
And in the spirit of Martel and King Roger I of Sicily, Europeans will come to the realization that Europe is a European land reserved for European people, and that all outsiders are guests in their lands and must conform to the European way of life or else be expelled from Europe.
The era of weakness, submission, and "tolerance" is coming to an abrupt end, and Europeans will embark on the second Reconquista.
Order will be restored, and Europeans will reclaim their lands from the grips of the criminal cabal of international finance, vulture capitalism, and their leftist allies. We will decide our own fate, rather than having politically correct cowards dictate what Europe stands for and how Europeans should act.
The spirit of our forefathers will guide our actions, and like them, we will never surrender our birthright and we will ensure that the next generation of Europeans will inherit a territory in which their culture can thrive, rather than passing on to them Islamized nations governed by a hostile leftist elite.
The time for "tolerance" has long since passed and Europeans must respond to each and every provocation against our people in our lands.
Every time one of our women is raped by one of the left's imported invaders, hell must be brought down upon the perpetrator. Every time one of the left's imported invaders commits an act of violence against a European while yelling "Allahu Akbar", Europeans must respond as the Spartans would have.
Take it from Mr. Murros, who has more eloquently than I proclaimed that Europeans have reached the limits of their tolerance:
"We do not tolerate that every day our people are being attacked by wild gangs of alien thugs the liberal elite has invited in. We do not tolerate that our people, in their own native countries, have to live in fear of foreign career criminals. We do not tolerate that our people, despite their hospitality and kindness, are still constantly ridiculed, mocked, derided, and vilified by malicious and perverse red intellectuals, academic parasites, the spiritual enemies of Europe. And all this with the obliging help from the liberal media."
It is time for (real) European men, those who will bear the brunt of the resistance, to separate the wheat from the chaff. All Europeans who choose to align with the Islamists are worthless to us and may no longer be considered European. They are the enemies of Europe's survival and should be treated as such.
Seek out the alpha males who will form the backbone of the defense of Europa and network, conspire, and train for the battles that you will be facing in the near future.
It may be necessary to form a network of resistance movements in each European nation who are guided by common principles and a common cause. International cooperation between the nations of Europe will be essential to the survival of the continent.
Any resistance movements/organizations should instill discipline, honor, and strategic thinking in its members.
As I have previously mentioned, The Art of War by Sun Tzu is a good starting point, but you should also study Clausewitz (On War) and the general principles of guerrilla warfare.
Such advice may seem a bit over-the-top, but as someone who understands the devious intent of the hostile invaders of our territories, I believe making such preparations is necessary.
For example, take the words of Marxist revolutionary Sukant Chandan :
"We (non-whites) have won, historically, the right to come here, in the 50s and the 60s and the 70s, when the West wanted, literally, us to do their dirty work here and they wanted us out. But we fought for our right to stay here, against the government and against the Far Right and racist organizations and movements. So, we've won our right to stay here. We're here to stay, permanently. That right has been won. Now, I think, the final challenge is for us to completely take over the West."
"By 2040-2045, the United States will become a majority non-white country. The majority ethnic group will be Hispanics. In Europe, by 2050, in England, ethnic minorities will comprise about 20% of the population. That's still a small amount - currently we're only 8% - but you have to see we are strategically positioned: we are strategically positioned in the metropolitan areas of the West, which are the most important areas."
"To white people I'd say, "Respect non-white people. Respect them according to who they are." Who they are is usually very friendly and very nice and we only want the West to treat us with mutual respect, with peace and friendship."
Mr. Chandan, you are seriously deluded if you think that you and your fellow barbarians would ever be able to "completely take over the West". That would never happen in a million years.
And if you are expecting Europeans to treat you and your ilk with "mutual respect, peace, and friendship", you are sadly mistaken. On the contrary, you will be met with disdain, violence, and animosity if you attempt to "take over the West", as you seem to believe you and your primitive, stone-age compadres can accomplish.
You may be used to dealing with weak, submissive, docile leftists, but you must understand that a new sheriff is coming to town. We will resist the colonization of our lands by all means necessary, and all those who oppose us will meet the same fate as all those who have ever attempted to colonize our lands in the past.
You are dealing with the descendants of Vikings, Saxons, and Franks. From the Spartans of the South to the Northmen of Scandinavia, our people represent the apex of organized warfare, and I suggest that all guests in our lands tread lightly and respect us, and especially our women, in our homelands.
If you choose to do otherwise, expect the hammer of Thor to reign down upon you with such force that the entire world will feel the aftershocks.
In the words of Murros:
"The prime directives for the new European youth will be "command and conquer, seek and destroy". We can see it now clearly, this is war. A war of economic and social subterfuge against the European people. A war of ethnic cleansing and physical replacement of the European people. An intellectual and emotional blackmail in order to subdue the Europeans. But I can assure you, we refuse to be at the receiving end of these things for any longer. Soon, Europe awakes, and when that day comes, then finally, the storm breaks loose."
A.J. WASHINGTONhttp://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c7f_1437599973CernunnosThe Invisible WarLiberal failures, white genocide, Kai Murro, new leader, the new right Second Planned Parenthood Senior Executive Haggles Over Baby Parts Prices, Changes Abortion Methods Wed, 22 Jul 2015 01:55:41 -0400http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=72b_1437544176
Honorthe343LOS ANGELES, July 21-A second undercover video shows Planned Parenthood
Federation of America's Medical Directors' Council President, Dr. Mary
Gatter, haggling over payments for intact fetal specimens and offering
to use a "less crunchy technique" to get more intact body parts.
It
is similar to last week's viral video showing PPFA Senior Director of
Medical Services Dr. Deborah Nucatola admitting to using partial-birth
abortions to get intact parts and suggesting a price range of $30 to
$100 per specimen.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=72b_1437544176Honorthe343Second Planned Parenthood Senior Executive Haggles Over Baby Parts Prices, Changes Abortion Methods Planed parenthood, abortion,Merkel's Authority Under Threat As Finance Minister Threatens ResignationTue, 21 Jul 2015 09:13:34 -0400http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b5e_1437484269
gemini 2
Angela Merkel's authority has been seriously dented after her Finance Minister, Wolfgang Sch"auble, threatened to resign if he is pushed to offer more concessions to Greece.
Sch"auble, who proposed of "temporary" Grexit last week, also cast doubt on whether the proposed EUR86bn bailout will work, openly admitting to magazine Der Spiegel that he disagreed with Merkel.
"Divergent opinions are a part of democracy," he said. "In such a case, you jointly hash out a solution. In that process, everyone has a role to play. Politicians' responsibilities come from the offices they hold. Nobody can coerce them. If anyone were to try, I could go to the president and ask to be relieved of my duties."
On Friday, the German Chancellor suffered the biggest ever rebellion against her leadership from within her own party, as a fifth of legislators from the centre-right CDU/CSU grouping voted against new bailout talks.
Mr Sch"auble stands in the middle of this, advocating a much stronger line against Greece than Merkel. The Times says he now regularly wins standing ovations at private meetings of the parliamentary group, and was applauded during Friday's debate.
German tabloid Bild has even published an image of him dressed as a superhero called "Euroman".
Meanwhile, a YouGov poll gave him a higher popularity rating among German voters than Mrs Merkel. A total of 49 per cent saying they agreed with his stance on Greece, compared to 46 per cent for the Chancellor. Angela Merkel therefore cannot afford to lose Sch"auble.
If he were to resign or be sacked it could provoke a rebellion in the party and the wider country that could spell the end for her chancellorship. German daily S"uddeutsche Zeitung said the rise of Sch"auble marked the "end of Merkel's omnipotence," adding that he had "grown into a second chancellor alongside her." "With his hard line in the Greece talks he negotiated himself into the hearts of his fellow party members. If the conservative parliamentary group could vote freely on whom they trust more on the Greece policy, Sch"auble would win over Merkel."
21 July 2015 http://ss8.mu.sl.pthttp://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b5e_1437484269gemini 2Merkel's Authority Under Threat As Finance Minister Threatens ResignationMerkel's Authority Under Threat As Finance Minister Threatens Resignation431 Islamic State Suspects Arrested - Attacks PreventedSun, 19 Jul 2015 08:36:48 -0400http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e30_1437309180
gemini 2
Saudi Arabia's Ministry of Interior has announced the arrest of 431 suspected terrorists linked to Islamic State, preventing suicide attacks on mosques, security forces and a diplomatic mission.
The announcement came after Islamic State (IS) claimed responsibility for Thursday's car bomb attack at a security checkpoint in Riyadh near Saudi Arabia's highest security prison, which killed the driver and wounded two security officials.
The Wall Street Journal reports the arrests were made over the past few weeks but a spokesman for the interior ministry, Maj. Gen. Mansour al-Turki, said: "We didn't want to make this announcement during the holy month of Ramadan." Ramadan ended on Friday.
According to the Ministry of Interior those under arrest are mostly Saudi citizens, but others other nationalities featured "including Yemeni, Egyptian, Syrian, Jordanian, Algerian, Nigerian, Chadian, and unidentified others."
The official announcement explained some of the arrests. Some were arrested for planning "so-called operations of 'solo wolf' aimed at inciting sectarian strife...according to orders received from the deviant organisation abroad."
The smuggling and provision of weaponry and chemical fertilisers, the manufacture of explosive belts, technical assistance and other activities in support of attacks such as surveying potential attack sites and providing transport were also cited. In addition some were arrested for "working to spread the deviant thought via the Internet."
Perhaps most significantly the Ministry of Interior arrested Hadi Kotaim Shaibani. He is a Saudi citizen, believed to be the coordinator between IS leaders outside the kingdom and those within.
Reuters reports that a series of terrorist attacks in Saudi Arabia carried out by IS supporters fuelled concerns of a growing threat of militancy in the world's top oil exporter. IS says its priority target is the Arabian peninsula, in particular Saudi Arabia (which houses some of Islam's holiest places), from where it plans to expel Shi'ite Muslims. The destabilising effects of such a campaign could have worldwide economic consequences owing to the importance of the Saudi energy industry.
The Wall Street Journal notes this is not the first time Saudi Arabia has been targeted by Islamist militants. Al Qaeda waged a similar campaign in the country between 2003 and 2006, but it was defeated. The rise of IS is said to be a different challenge, with Saudi officials admitting the group's planning and recruitment is more sophisticated.
19 July 2015 http://sp6.1j.sl.pthttp://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e30_1437309180gemini 2431 Islamic State Suspects Arrested - Attacks Prevented431 Islamic State Suspects Arrested - Attacks PreventedPlanned Parenthood involved in trafficking and sale of baby body parts. Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:32:39 -0400http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=a49_1436981266
Ham_SandwichLOS ANGELES, July 14-New undercover footage shows Planned Parenthood Federation of America's Senior Director of Medical Services, Dr. Deborah Nucatola, describing how Planned Parenthood sells the body parts of aborted fetuses, and admitting she uses partial-birth abortions to supply intact body parts.
In the video, Nucatola is at a business lunch with actors posing as buyers from a human biologics company. As head of PPFA's Medical Services department, Nucatola has overseen medical practice at all Planned Parenthood locations since 2009. She also trains new Planned Parenthood abortion doctors and performs abortions herself at Planned Parenthood Los Angeles up to 24 weeks.
The buyers ask Nucatola, "How much of a difference can that actually make, if you know kind of what's expected, or what we need?"
"It makes a huge difference," Nucatola replies. "I'd say a lot of people want liver. And for that reason, most providers will do this case under ultrasound guidance, so they'll know where they're putting their forceps. The kind of rate-limiting step of the procedure is calvarium. Calvarium-the head-is basically the biggest part."
Nucatola explains, "We've been very good at getting heart, lung, liver, because we know that, so I'm not gonna crush that part, I'm gonna basically crush below, I'm gonna crush above, and I'm gonna see if I can get it all intact."
"And with the calvarium, in general, some people will actually try to change the presentation so that it's not vertex," she continues. "So if you do it starting from the breech presentation, there's dilation that happens as the case goes on, and often, the last step, you can evacuate an intact calvarium at the end."
Using ultrasound guidance to manipulate the fetus from vertex to breech orientation before intact extraction is the hallmark of the illegal partial-birth abortion procedure (18 U.S.C. 1531).
Nucatola also reveals that Planned Parenthood's national office is concerned about their liability for the sale of fetal parts: "At the national office, we have a Litigation and Law Department which just really doesn't want us to be the middle people for this issue right now," she says. "But I will tell you that behind closed doors these conversations are happening with the affiliates."
The sale or purchase of human fetal tissue is a federal felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $500,000 (42 U.S.C. 289g-2).
A separate clip shows Planned Parenthood President and CEO Cecile Richards praising Nucatola's work to facilitate connections for fetal tissue collection. "Oh good," Richards says when told about Nucatola's support for fetal tissue collection at Planned Parenthood, "Great. She's amazing."
The video is the first by The Center for Medical Progress in its "Human Capital" series, a nearly 3-year-long investigative journalism study of Planned Parenthood's illegal trafficking of aborted fetal parts. Project Lead David Daleiden notes: "Planned Parenthood's criminal conspiracy to make money off of aborted baby parts reaches to the very highest levels of their organization. Elected officials must listen to the public outcry for Planned Parenthood to be held accountable to the law and for our tax dollars to stop underwriting this barbaric abortion business."http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=a49_1436981266Ham_SandwichPlanned Parenthood involved in trafficking and sale of baby body parts. Abortion, Planned Parenthood, Body parts, TraffickingPlanned parenthood Illegally selling aborted baby parts, caught on tape.Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:00:32 -0400http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c3d_1436899994
V650Watch as she eats her lunch and talks about selling pieces of babys, their hearts, kidneys, lungs and oh those precious livers.
They say ISIS just blew up a baby, these fuckers are cutting their heads off in the womb.
LOS ANGELES, July 14-New undercover footage shows Planned Parenthood Federation of America's Senior Director of Medical Services, Dr. Deborah Nucatola, describing how Planned Parenthood sells the body parts of aborted fetuses, and admitting she uses partial-birth abortions to supply intact body parts.
In the video, Nucatola is at a business lunch with actors posing as buyers from a human biologics company. As head of PPFA's Medical Services department, Nucatola has overseen medical practice at all Planned Parenthood locations since 2009. She also trains new Planned Parenthood abortion doctors and performs abortions herself at Planned Parenthood Los Angeles up to 24 weeks.
The buyers ask Nucatola, "How much of a difference can that actually make, if you know kind of what's expected, or what we need?"
"It makes a huge difference," Nucatola replies. "I'd say a lot of people want liver. And for that reason, most providers will do this case under ultrasound guidance, so they'll know where they're putting their forceps. The kind of rate-limiting step of the procedure is calvarium. Calvarium-the head-is basically the biggest part."
Nucatola explains, "We've been very good at getting heart, lung, liver, because we know that, so I'm not gonna crush that part, I'm gonna basically crush below, I'm gonna crush above, and I'm gonna see if I can get it all intact."
"And with the calvarium, in general, some people will actually try to change the presentation so that it's not vertex," she continues. "So if you do it starting from the breech presentation, there's dilation that happens as the case goes on, and often, the last step, you can evacuate an intact calvarium at the end."
Using ultrasound guidance to manipulate the fetus from vertex to breech orientation before intact extraction is the hallmark of the illegal partial-birth abortion procedure (18 U.S.C. 1531).
Nucatola also reveals that Planned Parenthood's national office is concerned about their liability for the sale of fetal parts: "At the national office, we have a Litigation and Law Department which just really doesn't want us to be the middle people for this issue right now," she says. "But I will tell you that behind closed doors these conversations are happening with the affiliates."
The sale or purchase of human fetal tissue is a federal felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $500,000 (42 U.S.C. 289g-2).
A separate clip shows Planned Parenthood President and CEO Cecile Richards praising Nucatola's work to facilitate connections for fetal tissue collection. "Oh good," Richards says when told about Nucatola's support for fetal tissue collection at Planned Parenthood, "Great. She's amazing."
The video is the first by The Center for Medical Progress in its "Human Capital" series, a nearly 3-year-long investigative journalism study of Planned Parenthood's illegal trafficking of aborted fetal parts. Project Lead David Daleiden notes: "Planned Parenthood's criminal conspiracy to make money off of aborted baby parts reaches to the very highest levels of their organization. Elected officials must listen to the public outcry for Planned Parenthood to be held accountable to the law and for our tax dollars to stop underwriting this barbaric abortion business."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjxwVuozMnUhttp://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c3d_1436899994V650Planned parenthood Illegally selling aborted baby parts, caught on tape.Abortions, Planned parenthood, selling aborted baby parts like they were selling chicken livers.Drunk Indian teacher teaching students - D for DRINK LIQUOR!!Sun, 12 Jul 2015 17:20:33 -0400http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e5b_1436734722
ebolismDrunk teacher teaches D for DAARU (liquor), P for PIYO(drink) to students!!!
A teacher at a government-run primary school in Chhattisgarh's Korea district has been giving lessons on drinking. The teacher, who often comes to shool drunken, was caught on the camera asking his students to pronounce "daaru piyo" (drink liquor).
A local journalist filmed the teacher, Shivbaran, of Unnayan Primary School in Murma area of Korea district while he was giving lessons to the young students to go tipsy.
In the video, the teacher, who had written the Hindi words -- "daaru piyo" -- on the blackboard, can be seen asking the students to repeat it after him.
He later confessed to teaching in a drunken state. He also admitted that he would often reach the school drunken.
However, Shivbaran said that apart from teaching "daaru piyo", he also taught the students "according to syllabus".
After admitting it on camera, the teacher later tried to defend himself saying he had stopped drinking as he also apologised for his act.
"No, I have given up drinking long ago. I admit my mistake. I will never come drunk to school and teach students," he was quoted as saying by some TV channels.
After the teacher's clip went viral, the district administration has now promised action against Shivbaran.
"Being drunk at the work place is against the ideal behavior of a government official especially for a teacher. If this has been done by a teacher then we will investigate and take strict action against him," district collector Sanjiv Jha said.http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e5b_1436734722ebolismDrunk Indian teacher teaching students - D for DRINK LIQUOR!!Drunk Teacher, Asks Students, teaching, about, beer, drinking, liquor, education, Go Tipsy, WTF, Primary School, Daaru Piyo,MH-17 Case Slips into Propaganda FogSun, 12 Jul 2015 13:34:46 -0400http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=956_1436722301
MadashellronJuly 9, 2015Exclusive: Almost a year ago, Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 was shot down over eastern Ukraine killing 298 people. Yet, instead of a transparent investigation seeking justice, the case became a propaganda game of finger-pointing, with the CIA withholding key evidence all the better to blame Russia, reports Robert Parry.
By Robert Parry
The Dutch investigation into the shoot-down of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 over eastern Ukraine last July has failed to uncover conclusive proof of precisely who was responsible for the deaths of the 298 passengers and crew but is expected to point suspicions toward the ethnic Russian rebels, fitting with the West's long-running anti-Russian propaganda campaign.
A source who has been briefed on the outlines of the investigation said some U.S. intelligence analysts have reached a contrary conclusion and place the blame on "rogue" elements of the Ukrainian government operating out of a circle of hard-liners around one of Ukraine's oligarchs. Yet, according to this source, the U.S. analysts will demur on the Dutch findings, letting them stand without public challenge.
A Malaysia Airways' Boeing 777 like the one that crashed in eastern Ukraine on July 17, 2014. (Photo credit: Aero Icarus from Z"urich, Switzerland)
Throughout the Ukraine crisis, propaganda and "information warfare" have overridden any honest presentation of reality - and the mystery around the MH-17 disaster has now slipped into that haze of charge and counter-charge. Many investigative journalists, including myself, have been rebuffed in repeated efforts to get verifiable proof about the case or even informational briefings.
In that sense, the MH-17 case stands as an outlier to the usual openness that surrounds inquiries into airline disasters. The Obama administration's behavior has been particularly curious, with its rush to judgment five days after the July 17, 2014 shoot-down, citing sketchy social media posts to implicate the ethnic Russian rebels and indirectly the Russian government but then refusing requests for updates.
But why the later secrecy? If Director of National Intelligence James Clapper decided that unverified information about the shoot-down could be released five days after the event, why would his office then decide to keep the U.S. public in the dark as more definitive data became available?
Over the past 11 months, the DNI's office has offered no updates on the initial assessment, with a DNI spokeswoman even making the absurd claim that U.S. intelligence had made no refinements of its understanding about the tragedy since July 22, 2014.
I'm told that the reason for the DNI's reversal from openness to secrecy was that U.S. intelligence analysts found no evidence that the Russian government had given the rebels sophisticated anti-aircraft missiles capable of downing an aircraft at 33,000 feet, the altitude of MH-17, and that an examination of U.S. satellite and electronic intelligence instead implicated extremists linked to Ukraine's U.S.-backed regime, although not to Kiev's political leadership.
At that point, admitting to an erroneous rush to judgment would have embarrassed the administration and undermined the "public diplomacy" campaign around the MH-17 case. By blaming Russia and its President Vladimir Putin last summer, the Obama administration whipped Europe into an anti-Russian frenzy and helped win the European Union's support for economic sanctions against Russia. Keeping Putin on the defensive is a top U.S. priority.
As one senior U.S. government official explained to me, information warfare was the only area in the Ukraine crisis where Washington felt it had an edge over Moscow, which benefited from a host of other advantages, such as geography, economic and cultural ties, and military pressure.
'False Flags'
It also appears that right-wing Ukrainian political forces, which seized power in the Feb. 22, 2014 coup, have understood the value of propaganda, including "false flag" operations that pin the blame for atrocities on their opponents. One of the most successful may have been the mysterious sniper attacks on Feb. 20, 2014, that slaughtered both police and protesters in Kiev's Maidan square, with the violence immediately blamed on President Viktor Yanukovych and used to justify his overthrow two days later.
Later independent investigations indicated that extreme right-wing elements seeking Yanukovych's ouster were more likely responsible. Two European Union officials, Estonia's Foreign Minister Urmas Paet and European Union foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton, were revealed discussing in a phone call their suspicions that elements of the protesters were responsible for the shootings.
"So there is a stronger and stronger understanding that behind snipers it was not Yanukovych, it was somebody from the new coalition," Paet told Ashton, as reported by the UK Guardian . Maidan Massacre ."]
Even U.S. officials have faulted the new regime for failing to conduct a diligent investigation to determine who was to blame for the sniper attack. During a rousing anti-Russian speech in Kiev last month, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power inserted one criticism of the post-coup regime - that "investigations into serious crimes such as the violence in the Maidan and in Odessa scores of ethnic Russians were burned alive ] have been sluggish, opaque, and marred by serious errors - suggesting not only a lack of competence, but also a lack of will to hold the perpetrators accountable."
In other words, regarding the Maidan sniper massacre, the Kiev regime wasn't willing to reveal evidence that might undermine the incident's use as a valuable propaganda ploy. That attitude has been shared by the mainstream Western media which has sought to glue white hats on the post-coup regime and black hats on the ethnic Russian rebels who supported Yanukovych and have resisted the new power structure.
For instance, since Yanukovych's ouster nearly 1 1/2 years ago, The New York Times and other mainstream outlets have treated reports about the key role played in the coup regime by neo-Nazis and other far-right nationalists as "Russian propaganda." However, this week, the Times finally acknowledged the importance of these extremists in Kiev's military operations. Ukraine Merges Nazis and Islamists. "]
A similar propaganda fog has enveloped the MH-17 investigation, with the lead investigators - the Dutch, British, Australians and Ukrainians - all firmly in the pro-Kiev and anti-Moscow camp. (Specialists from the United States, Russia and Malaysia have also been involved in the inquiry.)
Not surprisingly, leaders in Ukraine and Australia, as well, didn't wait for the investigation to reach a conclusion before placing the blame on Putin. Last October, Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott used an Australian football term in vowing to "shirtfront" Putin about his supposed guilt in the MH-17 case.
Media Fakery
Keeping the later U.S. intelligence analysis secret also allows for the Putin-did-it propaganda campaigns to go forward in mainstream media outlets and various propaganda fronts. A good example was the Australian "60 Minutes" report in May presenting bogus video evidence supposedly corroborating "Russia-did-it" claims made by British blogger Eliot Higgins.
While the segment appeared to be authoritative - supposedly proving that Putin was responsible for mass murder - a closer examination showed that the program had relied on video fakery to mislead its viewers. The key scene supposedly matching up a video of a getaway Buk anti-aircraft missile battery with landmarks in the rebel-controlled city of Luhansk didn't match up at all. You Be the Judge. "]
After I revealed the fraud by showing how the two scenes were almost entirely different, the Australian show fell back on a claim that one utility pole in the getaway video looked like a utility pole that its reporting team had found in Luhansk. It is perhaps a sign of how crazy the anti-Russian propaganda has gotten that a major news program could feel that it can make such an absurd argument and get away with it.
In a rational world, matching up the two scenes would require all the landmarks to fit, when in this case none of them did. Further, to cite similarities between two utility poles as evidence ignored the fact that most utility poles look alike and there was the additional fact that none of the area around the two utility poles matched at all, including a house behind one that didn't appear in the scene of the other. A Reckless Stand-upper on MH-17 ."]
However, as long as the U.S. government's comprehensive intelligence information on MH-17 is kept secret, such sleights of hand can continue to work. I'm told that the Dutch report is likely to contain similar circumstantial claims, citing such things as the possible angle of the fired missile, to suggest that the ethnic Russian rebels were at fault.
Last October, the Dutch Safety Board's initial report answered very few questions, beyond confirming that MH-17 apparently was destroyed by "high-velocity objects that penetrated the aircraft from outside." Other key questions went begging, such as what to make of the Russian military radar purporting to show a Ukrainian SU-25 jetfighter in the area, a claim that the Kiev government denied.
Either the Russian radar showed the presence of a jetfighter "gaining height" as it closed to within three to five kilometers of the passenger plane - as the Russians claimed in a July 21 press conference - or it didn't. The Kiev authorities insisted that they had no military aircraft in the area at the time.
But the 34-page Dutch report was silent on the jetfighter question, although noting that the investigators had received Air Traffic Control "surveillance data from the Russian Federation." The report also was silent on the "dog-not-barking" issue of whether the U.S. government had satellite surveillance that revealed exactly where the supposed ground-to-air missile was launched and who may have fired it.
The Obama administration has asserted knowledge about those facts, but the U.S. government has withheld satellite photos and other intelligence information that could presumably corroborate the charge. Curiously, too, the Dutch report said the investigation received "satellite imagery taken in the days after the occurrence." Obviously, the more relevant images in assessing blame would be aerial photography in the days and hours before the crash.
The Dutch report's reference to only post-crash satellite photos was also odd because the Russian military released a number of satellite images purporting to show Ukrainian government Buk missile systems north of the eastern Ukrainian city of Donetsk before the attack, including two batteries that purportedly were shifted 50 kilometers south of Donetsk on July 17, the day of the crash, and then removed by July 18.
Russian Lt. Gen. Andrey Kartopolov called on the Ukrainian government to explain the movements of its Buk systems and why Kiev's Kupol-M19S18 radars, which coordinate the flight of Buk missiles, showed increased activity leading up to the July 17 shoot-down.
The Ukrainian government countered these questions by asserting that it had "evidence that the missile which struck the plane was fired by terrorists, who received arms and specialists from the Russian Federation," according to Andrey Lysenko, spokesman for Ukraine's Security Council, using Kiev's preferred term for the rebels.
Lysenko added: "To disown this tragedy, are drawing a lot of pictures and maps. We will explore any photos and other plans produced by the Russian side." But Ukrainian authorities have failed to address the Russian evidence except through broad denials.
Where's the Intelligence?
On July 29, 2014, amid escalating rhetoric against Russia from U.S. government officials and the Western news media, the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity called on President Obama to release what evidence the U.S. government had on the shoot-down, including satellite imagery.
"As intelligence professionals we are embarrassed by the unprofessional use of partial intelligence information," the group wrote. "As Americans, we find ourselves hoping that, if you indeed have more conclusive evidence, you will find a way to make it public without further delay. In charging Russia with being directly or indirectly responsible, Secretary of State John Kerry has been particularly definitive. Not so the evidence. His statements seem premature and bear earmarks of an attempt to 'poison the jury pool.'"
However, the Obama administration has failed to make public any intelligence information that would back up its earlier suppositions or any new evidence at all. One source told me that U.S. intelligence analysts are afraid to speak out about the information that contradicts the original rush to judgment because of Obama's aggressive prosecution of whistleblowers.
If the Dutch final report emerges with carefully circumscribed circumstantial evidence implicating the pro-Russian rebels, the nuances will surely be carved away when the report is fed into the existing propaganda machinery. The conventional wisdom about "Russian guilt" will be firmed up.
A sense of how that will go can be seen in a recent New York Times article by David Herszenhorn on June 29: "Pro-Russian separatist leaders in the eastern Ukrainian region of Luhansk have blocked access to Dutch law enforcement officials pursuing an investigation into the downing of a Malaysian jetliner nearly a year ago, the Netherlands Public Prosecution Office said. ...
"The obstruction by separatist officials prompted the investigators, from the Dutch National Police and Ministry of Defense, to cut short their field work in Ukraine without conducting research into cellphone towers and cellular networks in the region, the public prosecution office said. ...
"Based on preliminary analysis and intelligence, including from the United States government, the aircraft was widely believed to have been destroyed by a surface-to-air missile fired from territory controlled by Russian-backed separatist forces."
While the thrust of Herszenhorn's article made the ethnic Russian rebels look bad - and foreshadows some of the points likely to be featured in the Dutch investigative report - perhaps the most significant word in the story is "preliminary." While it's true that the U.S. government's "preliminary" report on July 22, 2014, implicated the rebels, the more pertinent question - not asked by the Times - is why there has been no refinement of that "preliminary" report.
The Dutch Safety Board issued a brief progress report on July 1 noting that it had submitted a draft of its final report to "accredited representatives of the participating States on ... June 2," giving them 60 days to submit comments before a "definitive final" report is published in October.
Meanwhile, Dutch prosecutors handling the criminal investigation say they have no specific suspects, but lead investigator Fred Westerbeke claims the probe has a number of "persons of interest." Westerbeke said the criminal probe will likely run through the end of the year or later.
https://consortiumnews.com/2015/07/09/mh-17-case-slips-into-propaganda-fog/http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=956_1436722301MadashellronMH-17 Case Slips into Propaganda FogUkraine, MH-17, CIA, United States, Russia, MalaysiaBill O'Reilly Donald Trump Interview. Trump Slams GOP Field: I Don't Have a Lot of Respect for ...Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:01:35 -0400http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0cd_1436702166
WW3PowersThis going to confused the hell out of o'rielly supports and trump supporters lol. O'reilly never sounded so smart lol and trump never sounded like a leader.
Published on Jun 16, 2015bill o'reilly speaks to donald trump on him running for president. tonight in an O'Reilly Factor exclusive, Trump explains why he's the one Americans should trust to right the ship. Billionaire Donald Trump announced today that he's throwing his hat in the ring to run for president. O'Reilly Factor will feature an extensive interview with Trump that is expected to cover a wide variety of topics. And, according to some advance excerpts provided by Fox, Trump is holding nothing back. Trump has nothing nice to say about any of his fellow 2016 candidates, whether they are on the left or right side of the political spectrum.
"Well I don't have a lot of respect for many of them, but yes I do a couple," Trump said of the 2016 field, without naming any names. "But I will tell you I've been dealing with politicians all my life. They are all talk, no action." Trump sat down with Bill O'Reilly for his first post-announcement interview and discussed a variety of topics, including how he would defeat ISIS.
"I would find our proper general. I would find the Patton or the MacArthur," Trump said. "I would hit them so hard your head would spin."
Trump also weighed in on the Iran nuclear talks and asserted that the biggest problem the world faces right now is maniacs controlling nuclear weapons.
"Obama wants to play golf instead of deal with people," Trump said. "Part of being a leader is to get everybody in line."
What would you do about Vladimir Putin? O'Reilly asked.
"I would be willing to bet I would have a great relationship with Putin," Trump said, adding that the Russian president has no respect for Obama. "You can't have everybody hating you. The whole world hates us."
O'Reilly noted that during his announcement, Trump promised to build a wall along the southern border and make Mexico pay for it. "The Factor" host stated that there's no way that they will pay for it.
"You have to let me handle that," Trump said. "They will pay for the wall, and the wall will go up. And Mexico will start behaving. Mexico is not our friend."
As for his fellow GOP presidential candidates, Trump said, "I don't have a lot of respect for many of them."
"They're all talk. They're no action. And they're totally controlled by their donors and by the lobbyists ... If we have another politician, this country's going down."
Stay tuned for the video.
On Jeb Bush specifically, Trump added, "I'm not a big fan of Jeb Bush. The last thing we need is another Bush."
As for Hillary Clinton, Trump said he laughs when he sees her talk about income inequality. "That can be beaten. That can be beaten. All you have to do is take a look at her donor list," he said, admitting that he could lose the general election for attacking her as a woman. "Maybe I don't win for that reason," he said. "But maybe I do."
But while Trump had plenty of negative things to say about the Americans he is running against, he was surprisingly genial on the topic of Russia President Vladimir Putin.
"Putin has no respect for our president whatsoever. He's got a tremendous popularity in Russia, they love what he's doing, they love what he represents," Trump said. "I was over in Moscow two years ago and I will tell you - you can get along with those people and get along with them well. You can make deals with those people. Obama can't."
"I would be willing to bet I would have a great relationship with Putin," he added. "It's about leadership."
Finally, Trump laid out his unique plan to defeat ISIS. "I say that you can defeat ISIS by taking their wealth," he said. "Take back the oil. Once you go over and take back that oil they have nothing. You bomb the hell out of them and then you encircle it, and then you go in. And you let Mobil go in, and you let our great oil companies go in. Once you take that oil they have nothing left."
"I would hit them so hard," he continued. "I would find you a proper general, I would find the Patton or MacArthur I would hit them so hard your head would spin."
"There's nobody bigger or better at the military than I am," Trump declared with typical understatement.
We will post the full video of O'Reilly's interview with Trump as soon as it becomes available.
In his announcement he said the other Republican candidates don't have what it takes to solve the problems facing the nation. Tonight in an O'Reilly Factor exclusive, Trump explains why he's the one Americans should trust to right the ship.Will Americans Get Behind Donald Trump?
Guests:Monica Crowley &amp; Kirsten Powers
Kirsten and Monica respond to our interview with Donald Trump and talk about whether American voters will take Trump seriously as a presidential candidate in 2016.http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0cd_1436702166WW3PowersBill O'Reilly Donald Trump Interview. Trump Slams GOP Field: I Don't Have a Lot of Respect for ...Donald trump bill o'reilly fox newsObama reopens embassy in Cuba, <span class="highlight">admitting</span> to failure of 54 yo US policy on Cuba Wed, 01 Jul 2015 13:35:34 -0400http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=21e_1435771696
Lake8737It shows Cuba's victory after over half a century struggle against US hostility. China had the same experience and the US isolated China for 30 years before finally recognizing People's Rupublic of China.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=21e_1435771696Lake8737Obama reopens embassy in Cuba, <span class="highlight">admitting</span> to failure of 54 yo US policy on Cuba china,chinese,usa,cuba