Predictive models of archaeological
site location vary widely in the assumptions and underlying principles on which
they are based (Kohler and Parker 1986; Kvamme 1990). Two main reasons for variation
among models are: (1) differences in the social organization of the people whose
archaeological remains are being modeled; and (2) differences in the composition
and history of the landscape that is the backdrop to site location. The basic
assumptions underlying predictive models of site location in complex societies
with a hierarchical settlement structure and a well-developed market system
are quite different from those of models of site location in less complex hunter-gatherer,
band-based societies whose members move from place to place throughout the year
in small groups in an annual settlement-subsistence cycle.Similarly,
models for dynamic landscapes must be different from models for static landscapes.
In dynamic environments, the micro niche in which a settlement was once found
may be markedly different from its location today, and many sites may be deeply
buried by massive sediment transportation, such as alluvial fan or dune formation.
A first-step in developing a predictive model of site location, then, is to
assess the nature of the societies whose activity locations are being modeled
and of the landscapes they lived in.

Chapter 3 reviews Minnesota’s
environments, both in the present and in the past, and the history of the state’s
precontact and contact period Native American people. The emphasis throughout
is on those factors and processes that affect the development and use of an
archaeological predictive model of precontact and contact period archaeological
site location in Minnesota. Besides outlining the background features that constrain
and channel the modeling process for this period in Minnesota, the chapter serves
as an introduction to the state's early Native American culture history, climate,
and environment for those unfamiliar with its cultural and environmental history.

At historic contact Minnesota was
a mosaic of forests, lakes, wetlands, and prairies (Marschner 1974; Aaseng et
al. 1993; Tester 1995; Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 1995). Biologists
organize this mosaic in a variety of ways, depending upon their research interests.
None of these arrangements is ideal for predictive modeling, for they suggest
static environments with stable geological and biological characteristics. When
viewed through the millennia the land was dynamic and constantly changing. To
simplify this review, descriptions by the first government land surveyors in
the nineteenth century are used to divide Minnesota into four biotic provinces:
boreal forest (spruce and pine), mixed hardwood forest (conifer/deciduous forest),
deciduous forest (including oak savanna), and prairie (Marschner 1974; Cleland
1966; Mason 1981:56-61). Since plant communities reflect regional climatic patterns,
and since animal species are better adapted to some plant communities than to
others, biotic provinces are associations of climate and plant and animal communities. Figure 3.1 shows the location of these biotic
provinces at specific times in the past.

3.2.1.1 Boreal Forest

The boreal forest is the most northern
of the four provinces (Pielou 1988; Larsen 1980). It is also called the Spruce-Fir-Moose-Caribou
Biome, a more descriptive label from the perspective of Native American hunter-gatherer
societies (Cleland 1966). Although it now covers only a small slice of northeastern
Minnesota, it expands to the north, stretching from Alaska to Newfoundland and
northward to the treeline. Referred to over much of its area as the subarctic,
it is known for its long, cold winters, deep snowcover, and short, warm summers.
It is a recently deglaciated land of thin soils, exposed bedrock, and immature
drainage. An intricate maze of bogs, lakes, and rivers remains as a heritage
of this withdrawal of glacial ice. Its forest cover is taiga, or boreal coniferous
forest, a forest composed of often dense stands of black and white spruce, white
birch, jack pine, balsam fir, and tamarack. Poplar, cedar, and willow are also
present, as are white pine, red pine, and hemlock. The latter species are intrusive
members from the mixed hardwood province to the south and occur in greatest
densities along the southern edge of the boreal forest.

Game animals associated with the
boreal forest include moose, caribou, black bear, wolf, lynx, wolverine, marten,
fisher, red fox, porcupine, beaver, and snowshoe hare. Fish are abundant in
lakes and rivers. The most important of these are bass, pike, pickerel, whitefish,
lake trout, sturgeon, smelt, perch, bullhead, catfish, sucker, and freshwater
drum. Turtles, frogs, and clams are also present in some lakes and rivers.

For hunter-gatherers with a limited
technology, the boreal forest is a difficult environment within which to gather
adequate food energy throughout the year. Its game animals are often dispersed
and tend to have low population densities, and its wild plant foods are limited.
In addition, its dense forests with their bogs, lakes, and rivers, and its severe
winters with heavy snowfalls make travel difficult, even with canoes and snowshoes.
As a result, human populations before historic contact tended to be low in numbers
and dispersed throughout much of the year. They congregated only in seasons
and usually at places where fish and game were particularly abundant.

3.2.1.2 Mixed Hardwood Forest

Most Minnesotans call the mixed
hardwood forest the "north woods" (Beyers 1989; Daniel and Sullivan
1981). Although a distinctive biotic province in its own right, it is also a
broad transition zone between the much larger boreal forest and deciduous forest
provinces, with boreal forest plants and animals increasing in frequency to
the north and deciduous forest plants and animals becoming more common to the
south. While all of the boreal forest trees are present, this biome is dominated
by still greater quantities of white, red, and Norway pine, cedar, alder, yellow
birch, beech, elm, hemlock, aspen, basswood, and sugar maple, especially to
the south. All of the boreal forest mammals are present, too, but caribou, wolverine,
and lynx are rare, while moose, mountain lion, and bobcat are more common. White-tailed
deer are common where deciduous trees are abundant.

The climate in the mixed hardwood
forest is intermediate as well. While winters are still long and cold, summers
are longer and warmer than in the north. Although the land was also heavily
glaciated, its soils are richer in organic content and tend to be deeper than
those in the north. It retains, however, extensive lakes and bogs, again a heritage
from the passing of the last glacier.

Since it is a mixture of boreal
forest and deciduous forest plants and animals, the mixed hardwood forest was
less harsh for hunter-gatherers. A wider variety of plants and animals were
present as a source of food and materials, and fish were equally abundant. Though
the growing season was too short to allow southern domesticates such as maize
(corn) and beans to mature, the harvesting of vast amounts of wild rice eventually
supported sizeable Native American villages in some areas.

3.2.1.3 Deciduous Forest

An increasingly narrower northwestward
extension of the deciduous forest province separates the mixed hardwood forest
and prairie biotic provinces in Minnesota (Yahner 1995). Also called the Oak-Deer-Maple
Biome, this province is characterized by broadleaf deciduous trees, like oak,
hickory, maple, beech, walnut, butternut, elm, ash, basswood, and cottonwood,
which drop their leaves in winter. Large numbers of a wide variety of animals
were present. Although white-tailed deer were the primary game animal, black
bear, elk, opossum, raccoon, cottontail rabbit, squirrels, gray fox, bobcat,
mountain lion, wolf, mink, otter, beaver, muskrat, and woodchuck were hunted,
too. Occasional buffalo and badgers inhabited areas of open grassland. The climate
of the province was still more moderate, with shorter winters, less snowfall,
and longer, hotter summers. Soils were deeper and richer, and drainage systems
much more mature than in the northern provinces.

Of the four biotic provinces reviewed
here, the densest populations of Native Americans in eastern North America were
in the deciduous forest province. Besides its rich plant and animal resources,
its longer growing season made the cultivation of domesticated food plants possible
and even highly productive. In some areas, especially in the southeastern United
States and along the central Mississippi River valley, complex farming societies
developed. These developments eventually influenced Minnesota, too, as will
be mentioned in the following section of this chapter.

3.2.1.4 Prairie

The fourth biotic province is the
prairie (Costello 1980). Also called the Grass-Oak-Bison Biome, it contained
prairie vegetation and animal associations. Typical mammals included buffalo,
elk, skunk, badger, jack rabbit, ground squirrel, gopher, and coyote. While
generally thought of as a region of sweeping tall grass prairie with scattered
copses of oak and hickory, forests were present along stream valleys, around
lakes, and on some plateaus and low hills. The most common tree species were
oak, sycamore, cottonwood, elm, hackberry, maple, basswood, and beech. Winters
and summers were similar to those of the deciduous forest province, but with
less precipitation.

Herds of buffalo on the prairies
acted as magnets that attracted Native Americans. Hunter-gatherers from the
northern forests of the state and farmers from the southern deciduous forest
entered the prairies seasonally to hunt these herds. Small groups of people
who lived year-round on the prairies had a successful buffalo-hunting economy
that remained largely unchanged for thousands of years. Eventually, however,
sizeable farming villages were established along a few of the major rivers flowing
through the prairies.

3.2.1.5 Landscape Complexity

This description of Minnesota’s
major biotic provinces at historic contact has glossed over complexities. A
few are worth stressing here, for they are important in understanding the context
in which precontact Native American cultures developed and some of the many
difficulties involved in predicting the location of their settlements.

First, each biome was composed of
a rich mosaic of still smaller biomes. Small lakes were abundant in some parts
of the prairie but not in others, and lakes and bogs were equally scattered
throughout the mixed hardwood forests. Furthermore, the major biomes merged
into one another in such intricate patterns that it is often difficult to determine
with precision where one began and the other ended.

Second, Native Americans did not
regard these provinces as bounded regions within which they had to confine their
pursuit for food energy. The biotic provinces were resource zones, and most
Native American societies moved freely from one to another throughout the year.
Their movement across biomes makes the task of predicting the location of sites
more difficult, for the ability to predict site locations at a high level of
probability depends in part on understanding why sites are where they are. Within
a single biotic province the relative seasonal abundance of food sources can
be used to model yearly subsistence-settlement patterns and site-specific activities.
This modeling process becomes complex when the extent of the annual range is
unknown, for subsistence options become multiple and uncertain when different
combinations of the seasonal use of the four biomes are possible.

Finally, the four provinces have
not been static biomes. There have been significant changes in their distribution
and composition both before and after historic contact. For example, the southward
bulge of deciduous forest in the south-central section of the state, the Big
Woods, developed only in the late precontact and contact periods (Grimm 1981,
1983, 1984). Farmers and loggers have severely altered the face of the prairie
and the biotic composition of the mixed hardwood forest. Even more drastic changes
occurred long before historic contact, when massive sheets of ice pushed across
the state. As these ice sheets inched southward, they compressed the biotic
provinces. When they retreated northward at the end of the Ice Age, they left
a raw, harsh, exposed environment that only slowly developed a soil base capable
of supporting larger trees and grasslands. Because these dramatic changes in
Minnesota’s past landscapes play an integral role in predicting archaeological
site location in the state, they are briefly outlined in the remainder of this
section.

3.2.2
Landscape Changes

3.2.2.1 Wisconsin
Glacial Period

People apparently first entered
the Americas near the end of the last glacial ice age, the Wisconsin (Bonnichsen
and Turnmire 1991; Fagan 1987). At the time glaciers, sheets of ice so large
and thick that they depressed the land they covered and raised land around their
edges, covered most of Minnesota. Glaciers not only limited the range of early
settlement in the state, they resculptured its surface as they retreated northward
by depositing tons of rocks and sediments, and by creating many rushing rivers
and extensive lakes. Minnesota's famous "10,000 lakes" are legacies
of these late glacial events (Ojakangas and Match 1982; Zumberge 1952; Pielou
1991).

The Wisconsin glacial period began
about 60,000 years ago and ended around 10,000 years ago. Much of Minnesota
was covered with glacial ice throughout this period, although glaciation took
place in a complex series of ice lobe advances and retreats (Wright 1971, 1972a;
Dyke and Prest 1986). During the maximum southward extent of ice masses about
20,000 years ago, only an area around Wolf Creek in central Minnesota and the
southern two corners of the state remained ice free (Figure
3.2). These unglaciated areas, however, were not well suitedfor
human habitation, for they were sparsely covered by vegetation and contained
few animals. Two principal ice lobes covered large areas of Minnesota near the
end of this period. The Superior Lobe crept southwestward out of the Lake Superior
Basin into east-central Minnesota, and the Des Moines Lobe first moved south
through the Red River valley and then turned east into the Minnesota River valley.
These huge masses of expanding ice gradually depressed the land they covered
from a few feet near their edges to several hundred feet at their northern cores.

When the glacial lobes began their
retreat around 14,000 years ago, the resulting meltwater formed enormous rivers
and lakes. Figure 3.3 shows the location of major glacial
lakes in Minnesota. The largest of these, Lake Agassiz, with a basin of almost
600,000 square miles, covered all of northwestern Minnesota at one time and
was the largest glacial lake in North America (Teller and Clayton 1983). It
began forming in the southern Red River valley 11,700 years ago and finally
disappeared from the state around 9000 years ago. During much of this period,
its only outlet was the Minnesota River Lowland, for possible northern outlets
were barricaded by ice. The size of its principal southern outlet, known as
Glacial River Warren, is still visible today, for it is the broad Minnesota
River valley (Matsch 1983). As the ice continued to retreat, previously blocked
northern drainage outlets gradually opened and Lake Agassiz began to drain northward
as the Red River does today.

Lake Superior also fluctuated greatly
in size and form during the Wisconsin glacial period. During the height of the
Ice Age, when enormous amounts of water were locked up in the continental glaciers,
water levels in the lake were quite low. As the ice retreated, the level rose
again, as did much of the surrounding land when the weight of the ice was removed
(LaBerge 1994; Phillips 1993). Periodic eastward discharges from Glacial Lake
Agassiz also had catastrophic effects on Lake Superior (Clayton 1983; Drexler
et al. 1983; Teller and Thorleifson 1983). The result was an intricate shift
in lake levels, locations of outlets, and beach positions that geomorphologists
and archaeologists try to reconstruct to decide when particular parcels of land
were above water and where they were in relation to the shore of the lake.

Depositions of till, channel cutting
by meltwater rivers, the formation of lakes from gigantic blocks of melting
ice, and other geological processes triggered by the glacial retreat created
an actively changing landscape in the state between 12,000 and 10,000 years
ago. These shifting landscapes were unlike any in Minnesota today. Only in the
southern corners of the state did more ancient landscapes, which formed before
the final glacial surge and retreat, survive. Nonetheless, although not covered
with ice during the Wisconsin glaciation, they were still affected by late glacial
geological processes. Strong winds along the front of the glacier masses deposited
a deep mantle of fine-grained dust called loess in both areas. Fine, silty soils
eventually developed within this loess deposit. Meltwater rivers also deposited
outwash, and widened and scoured valleys in these "unglaciated" sections
of the state.

During the greatest southward thrust
of Wisconsin ice, either tundra or a 400-mile wide, spruce-dominated boreal
forest bordered the ice edge from the Atlantic Ocean to the Rocky Mountains
(Wright 1976a, 1976b; Amundson and Wright 1979; Webb et al. 1983; Webb 1981).
Across most of late glacial Minnesota, spruce forest probably grew to the edge
of the ice and might even have grown over stagnant ice as the glaciers receded.
In fact, the presence of buried stagnant ice might have been the reason tundra
was not present, for the presence of the ice blocks would have retarded the
creation of the many lakes and bogs typical of a tundra until after active ice
had retreated still further northward. The pollen of sedges (Cyperaceae),
wormwoods (Artemisia), grasses (Graminae), willows (Salix),
and of other plants commonly associated with tundra has been found only in the
northeastern corner of the state. Tundra is a treeless area with permanently
frozen subsoil that can only support lichens, mosses, and stunted shrubs. This
limited zone of tundra was present from the beginning of the retreat of local
ice to about 10,000 years ago, when a boreal spruce (Picea) forest spread
across the area (Wright 1971).

3.2.2.2 Early Holocene

By 12,000 years ago, all of southern
Minnesota and most of the central part of the state were free of glaciers and
covered, for the most part, by open spruce parkland that contained coniferous
trees and grasses (Figure 3.4). This early forest has no modern counterpart,
for it contained small amounts of oak and other temperate climate deciduous
trees, such as black ash, and lacked jack pine, a common tree in northern boreal
forests today. This peculiar mix of trees was probably the result of the different
rates of migration of particular tree species from distant refuge areas and
of a more temperate, warmer climate than now exists in northern boreal forests
(Wright 1971, 1976a, 1976b; Amundson and Wright 1979). Many low-lying areas
within the forest were probably filled with open water and marsh or swamp. Openings
on higher ground were most likely covered with shrubs and grasses. In some areas,
such as the southeastern corner of the state, the spruce forest seems to have
contained large, open, swards of grassland.

A deciduous forest dominated by
birch, elm, and other trees that shed their leaves at the end of the growing
season entered the southwestern corner of Minnesota as early as 12,000 years
ago and spread outward about 11,000 years ago. At the same time, that is, about
11,000 years ago, a new oak-elm forest penetrated the southwestern corner of
the state and spread rapidly northward and eastward. This oak-elm forest covered
most of southwestern Minnesota throughout the early Holocene (post-glacial)
period.

Red or jack pine or both was present
along with birch and elm in a mixed forest that replaced the earlier spruce
forest in the southeastern corner of the state by 10,200 years ago. Eventually,
oak replaced birch and pine trees across southern Minnesota, while pine replaced
spruce forest in central Minnesota about 10,000 years ago. The northward retreat
of the spruce forest is a good marker for the end of the Wisconsin ice advance
in different parts of the state. The end of the Ice Age was not an event that
occurred at one point in time, but was a process that progressed slowly from
south to north.

By 11,200 years ago, the last massive
sheets of glacial ice had receded north of Minnesota, although ice remained
in the Lake Superior Basin for at least another 1000 years. The pioneer spruce
forest was short-lived in northern Minnesota. It was replaced by a rapid intrusion
of pine trees about 11,000 years ago (Figure
3.5). With the recession of Lake Agassiz, open oak forests spread over large
portions of the northwestern and north central sections of the state.

The composition of the animal communities
that occupied these Early Holocene forests is not fully known, although fossilized
bones from around the state provide some clues (Kurtén and Anderson 1980; Harington
and Ashworth 1986; Agenbroad 1984; Dreimanis 1967; Guthrie 1980). The spruce
forest was probably inhabited by now-extinct animal species, such as mastodon
and giant beaver, and by many modern mammals that were common in the north woods
in the early historic period. Mastodons preferred feeding on the coarse vegetation
of pine and spruce forests, for they found it difficult to find food in the
winter in deciduous forests that dropped their leaves. More open areas near
the ice contained mammoth, barren-ground caribou, and musk ox, and animal communities
in open prairie-like areas to the south included elk, mammoth, and now extinct
forms of large buffalo.

The reason for the extinction in
the Americas of many large mammals like mammoth and mastodon at the end of the
Ice Age remains a puzzle. Their disappearance has been attributed to overkill
by human predators and to climatic change (Martin 1967). A combination of these
processes seems a more likely explanation (Martin and Klein 1984). Modern species
of animals probably inhabited the deciduous and mixed deciduous-pine forests
that followed the spruce forest northward. White-tailed deer, moose, porcupine,
weasels, fisher, otter, coyote, bobcats, red fox, timber wolf, black bear, and
beaver are familiar examples. There were also many birds, fish, and amphibians
(Hocutt and Wiley 1986; Bailey and Smith 1981; Stewart and Lindsey 1983). In
fact the composition of the plant and animal communities of these forests and
of the expanding southwestern grasslands seems very similar to their modern
counterparts at historic contact, although these communities are not well known.

3.2.2.3 Middle Holocene

The following Middle Holocene postglacial
period in Minnesota roughly coincides with the Atlantic, the Sub-Boreal, and
the early half of the Sub-Atlantic climatic episodes (Bryson, et. al. 1970)
(Table 3.1). Environmentally, the Middle Holocene was a
dynamic period during which the prairie-forest border migrated far to the northeast
of its present position (Figure 3.6). These
severe vegetation dislocations were a result of the Atlantic climatic episode
(also called the Mid-Holocene dry period or Prairie period); during which dry
and possibly warm westerly winds blew across the state (Wright 1976b; Forester
et al. 1987). At its most severe, annual rainfall may have been 20 percent less
than modern levels and the average temperature 5 degrees Fahrenheit (2.8 degrees
Celsius) warmer than today. Eventually, even deciduous woods became restricted
to major river valleys, the edges of large lakes, and other less xeric, fire-protected
areas throughout much of the state. At its most eastward position about 5000
B.C. (7000 years ago), the prairie-forest border in north-central Minnesota
was more than 100 miles northeast of its modern position. However, by 4000 B.C.
(6000 years ago), the climate had become cooler and wetter, and the prairie
gradually retreated, reaching its approximate modern borders about 1000 B.C.
(3000 years ago) (Figure 3.6).

These climatic shifts are intricately
recorded in an uninterrupted sequence of annual laminations or varves that extend
from the historic period back to late glacial times at Elk Lake in north central
Minnesota (Bradbury and Dean 1993a). The history of the lake is clearly divided
by varves into three well-defined episodes: postglacial lake, prairie lake,
and modern mesic-forest lake with the prairie lake corresponding to the Mid-Holocene
dry period (Bartlein and Whitlock 1993; Bradbury and Dean 1993b; Whitlock et
al. 1993).

Beginning
of 2000-yr
general decline of
N. American summer
temperature

______________________________________________________

ca.
A.D. 950

Sub-Boreal

Expanded tundra,

glacial advances

______________________________________________________

2900-3000
B.C.

Atlantic ("Climatic Optimum")

Probably
warmest post-
glacial summers

Quite
warm summers,
cold winters

______________________________________________________

ca.
6000 B.C.

Boreal

>

Cochrane glacial
advance, "Younger
Dryas"

______________________________________________________

ca.
7200 B.C.

Pre-Boreal

Rapid Warming

ca.
8850 B.C.

Besides
producing dramatic shifts in the alignment of the prairie-forest border, the
Atlantic climatic episode caused many other changes in the distribution, density,
and composition of plant and animal communities. These changes profoundly affected
human adaptations in the state. During much of this period, the vast ocean of
prairie that covered all but the northeastern corner of the state presented
a startling contrast to the boreal vegetation present at 9000 B.C. (11,000 years
ago) and the mixed hardwood forest at 8000 B.C. (10,000 years ago). Few, if
any, spruce trees that once covered the state, remained in northeastern Minnesota,
and oak-shrub vegetation extended northwestward along the prairie-forest border.
Undoubtedly, animal communities suited to these zones of vegetation were present,
too, for Figure 3.7 shows the strong correlation
between the distribution of bison bone beds and prairie. A new arrival at this
time was white pine, which entered northeastern Minnesota by 2500 B.C. (4500
years ago) from its refuge in the Appalachian Highlands.

As cooler and especially moister
conditions returned to the state after 4000 B.C. (6000 years ago), the forest
gradually moved westward, often in jumps, with oak woodland advancing across
morainic ridges and with oak-poplar-brush prairie or woodland filling prairie
openings. When these fire hardy woodlands became sufficiently dense and extensive
to serve as effective fire barriers, mesic forest began to develop in their
lee. The result was a continually changing prairie-forest mosaic under the influence
of broad-scale climatic and local conditions (Clark 1993; Grimm 1983, 1984).
The prairie-forest ecotone remained more sharply defined throughout most of
the mid-Holocene, however, than it was in more recent periods. To the northeast,
as the mixed forest moved westward, white pine migrated with it, eventually
bypassing other pine species after 2000 B.C. (4000 years ago) in its migration
through northwestern Minnesota.

The modern diversity of the mixed
forest, and perhaps the floristic tension zone along its southern edge, dates
to this expansion. However, the composition of the developing deciduous and
mixed forests in the western Great Lakes region was not the same everywhere.
East-west gradients existed that affected the food resources available for human
exploitation. Beech, eastern hemlock, maple, hickory, and ash trees were more
abundant to the east and pine, birch, and oak to the west. The east-west gradient
in the north was from a mixed forest of pine with some maple trees in the east
to forests of pine with increased numbers of birch trees in northwestern Minnesota.
Travelers crossing the western Great Lakes would have found beech becoming scarce
first, then eastern hemlock, maple, pine, and finally birch before they walked
through oak scrub and out onto the prairies of northwestern Minnesota.

3.2.2.4 Middle-Late Holocene
Transition

Cooler, wetter conditions, which
coincide with the Sub-Boreal and early Sub-Atlantic climatic episodes, continued
throughout the late Middle and early Late Holocene periods. In northern Minnesota
extensive peatlands developed largely after 2000 B.C. (4000 years ago), when
the cooler, wetter conditions slowed the decomposition of plant materials on
poorly drained lake plains, especially on the bed of glacial Lake Agassiz (Graham
1957; Wright and Glaser 1983). Today these peat beds are about 10 feet thick.
The cooler conditions also resulted in the reappearance of spruce trees in the
north.

These large-scale vegetation shifts,
which were caused by continent-wide climatic episodes, are easy to trace in
the pollen record. Reconstructing the composition of small-scale localities
exploited seasonally by human foragers at the time is, however, much more difficult.
For example, shallow prairie lakes and marshes periodically dried completely,
while deeper lakes often shrank drastically. Mapping the distribution of surface
water in a small region for a particular moment in the past, is not a simple
task.

The position of the prairie-forest
border and the composition of the forests and woodlands could also have changed
rapidly and dramatically within short periods for other reasons. A trail through
the mixed forests in the north would have passed through a variety of growth
phases caused by fire and the successional redevelopment of climax forests.
Fire, soil, and topography also controlled the local distribution and composition
of prairie, oak scrub, and mesic forest. The almost annual late-summer fires
were blown northeastward by dry, southwesterly winds until they encountered
natural fire breaks, such as areas of high relief, lakes, and streams. All these
factors contributed to the constantly shifting patterns of local vegetation
along the prairie-forest border.

By the end of the Middle-Late Holocene
transition period (ca. 1500 B.C.), the major vegetation zones had, with a few
exceptions, reached their presettlement positions. Climatic oscillations continued
to occur throughout the Sub-Atlantic and Post-Sub-Atlantic, but they were minor
compared with the impact of the warm, dry westerlies of the Atlantic climatic
episode. The major difference between the distribution of vegetation then and
now was the absence of the Big Woods, the bulge of elm-oak forest that covered
a large area of south-central Minnesota in the late precontact and early European-American
settlement periods (Grimm 1981, 1983, 1984). Although oaks, aspen, and willow
had initiated the invasion of the prairie in this area at the end of the mid-Holocene
dry period at ca. 2500 B.C., The expansion of Big Woods trees (elm, basswood,
ironwood, sugar maple, ash, hickory, butternut) did not occur until 300 years
ago. Grimm concluded that the expansion was a result of a reduction in fire
frequency probably caused by increased precipitation and decreased temperature
during the "Little Ice Age" (A.D. 1550-1915) (see Table
3.1). Fire had probably also reduced the width of the belt of deciduous
trees that extended northwestward from the Big Woods until this time as well
(Clark 1990) (Figure 3.8).

The life ways of the earliest people
to live in Minnesota were an adjustment in part to these rapidly changing Late
Glacial and Holocene landscapes. Since these landscapes differed from modern
landscapes in distribution, and often in composition, predictive modelers cannot
assume that the present environmental associations of a site mirror those when
the site was created by Native Americans hundreds, if not thousands, of years
before European-American contact.

3.3 MINNESOTA'S
PRECONTACT AND CONTACT PERIOD CULTURE HISTORY: AN OUTLINE

The Native Americans encountered
in the middle of the seventeenth century by Minnesota's first European explorers
were heirs to a rich and varied cultural tradition that can be traced back at
least twelve thousand years. A goal of Minnesota archaeologists is to identify
and chart the sequence of archaeological cultures that makeup this long tradition
(Dobbs 1990a; Dobbs 1990b; Anfinson 1987; Wilford 1941, 1955, 1960).

Progress has been made over the
years in developing a meaningful precontact and contact period sequence for
the state. Because of the Early Holocene's turbulent landscape and the masking
of Middle Holocene settlement locations by thick deposits of sediment, the more
recent portions of the sequence are known in greater detail than are earlier
portions. This is reflected in the absence in the state of named archaeological
cultures for early Paleoindian, Plano, and Archaic societies.

3.3.1 Precontact
Period

The first human inhabitants of Minnesota
were most likely Paleoindians (Fagan 1987; Florin 1996; Harrison et al. 1995;
Magner 1994; Mason 1981; Pettipas and Buchner 1983). These pioneers entered
the state in small numbers as the lobes of the last major glacier, the Wisconsin,
receded. Their sites are difficult to find since they are small, contain few
artifacts, are few in number, and are often deeply buried beneath more recent
sediments. In fact Paleoindian sites are known primarily from a scatter of large
and distinctive lanceolate projectile points. Archaeologists know little about
their daily life compared with the life ways of their descendants. In some areas
they seem to have been highly mobile gatherers and hunters who pursued big game
such as bison, woodland caribou, mastodon, and mammoth. However, in the Late
Glacial and Early Holocene forests of Minnesota they probably relied more on
gathering and the hunting of a variety of smaller animals (Gibbon 1996a).

The Paleoindians were followed by
Archaic hunters and foragers (Bleed 1969; Dobbs 1978; Gibbon 1996a, 1996b; Michlovic
1983; Phillips and Brown 1983; Shay 1971; Steinbring 1974). Their customary
ways of behaving emerged in part as adjustments to a rapidly changing postglacial
environment and the extinction of mammoth and other large Ice Age mammals. New
complexes of plants and animals appeared as the spruce forests of the Paleoindian
period followed the retreating ice northward. The melting ice exposed new land
surfaces with extensive lakes and large, swift rivers quite unlike any in present-day
Minnesota. These people increasingly specialized in the exploitation of smaller
game, fish, shellfish, plant foods, and other energy resources that were not
very abundant in late glacial environments. Their more varied artifact assemblages
reflect this adjustment in subsistence practices. Archaic hunters and foragers
seem to have been less nomadic and more numerous than Paleoindian societies.
As a result, their sites, which are easily identified by the presence of large
notched and stemmed projectile points, are more frequently discovered and excavated
by archaeologists than are the camps of earlier people. However, because of
massive sedimentation during the earlier phases of the Archaic, which correspond
with the Early and Middle Holocene periods, many Archaic sites are deeply buried
in river valley deposits and are masked from surficial searches.

In Minnesota, Woodland cultures
are separated into an earlier Initial Woodland time period (ca. 500 B.C. - AD
500) and a later Terminal Woodland period (ca. AD 500-1650). Although a hunter-gatherer
way of life continued, the Initial Woodland is marked by the first appearance
of pottery vessels and the construction of earthen burial mounds (Anfinson 1987;
Benn 1979; Gibbon 1990; Hudak 1974; Lugenbeal 1976; Stoltman 1973). These innovations
were not adopted in all areas of the state at the same time or necessarily together.
The result was overlap in time between Late Archaic and early Initial Woodland
cultures, just as there had been an earlier period of transition between Paleoindian
and Archaic cultures. Because Initial Woodland sites are not as deeply buried
as earlier sites and burial mounds frequently mark their presence, they are
more easily found and more frequently excavated by archaeologists. They have
also been grouped together into archaeological cultures. This greater degree
of attention is reflected in the presence for the first time of the names of
regional archaeological cultures, such as Howard Lake, Fox Lake, Malmo, and
Laurel.

Terminal Woodland people were also
hunters and gatherers (Gibbon and Caine 1980; Gibbon 1994; Lugenbeal 1976).
However, their economy in the mixed hardwood forests to the north was increasingly
supplemented by the harvesting of wild rice. The number of people in the region
rose dramatically, and major abrupt changes occurred in ceramics and other artifact
forms and in settlement patterns. Archaeologists have generally relied on the
geographic distribution of the distinctive ceramics and burial practices of
the period to identify archaeological cultures in this northern region of the
state. Examples are Kathio, Blackduck, and Psinomani. In the southern part of
the state covered by deciduous forests and prairies, some Terminal Woodland
people gradually began growing maize, the domesticated plant we call corn. Some
people also built distinctive effigy mounds having the shape of birds, bears,
and other animals. Most of these southern Terminal Woodland societies abruptly
adopted new life ways and artifact assemblages, as well. Archaeologists group
these transformed societies together and regard them as a northern expression
of a "Mississippian" way of life. Mississippian sites are easily distinguished
from Woodland sites by their distinctive ceramics, by their larger size and
greater artifact density, and by the presence of maize (corn) fragments. Three
Mississippian complexes have been identified in Minnesota: Silvernale, Oneota,
and Plains Village (Dobbs 1984; Gibbon and Dobbs 1991; Gibbon 1979, 1982, 1983,
1991, 1993; Wilford 1945).

The transformation in life way of
Terminal Woodland people was similar in broad outline throughout the state and
may have been a regional expression of changes occurring at the same time across
eastern North America. Although connections with historic ethnic groups are
still clouded, these newly emergent cultures mark the first appearance in Minnesota
of the life ways of the Dakota, Iowa, and other Native American societies as
they were before European-American contact. It was Mississippian people to the
south and Terminal Woodland people to the north who met the first Europeans
to visit the state in the middle of the seventeenth-century.

3.3.2 Fur
Trade

According to most accounts, the
first Europeans to set foot in Minnesota were two Frenchmen, Sieur des Groseilliers
and Sieur de Radisson (Folwell 1956:7-13; Nute 1978). Although the details are
open to dispute, they apparently entered Minnesota between 1659 and 1660. Like
other Europeans and Americans who followed them for the next 180 years, they
came in small numbers in search of natural resources, such as furs, that could
be exploited for their own market system (Gilman 1982, 1992). By 1678, merchants
in Quebec and Montreal had formed a company to trade with the Dakota, the dominant
Native American people in the state at the time. These fur trade-related activities
initiated the French period of exploration and occupation in Minnesota, which
lasted into the early 1760s (Folwell 1956:1-52). However, European trade goods,
diseases, and influences had already reached north central North America years
before Groseilliers and Radisson set foot in the state, and at least some Dakota
had earlier contact with Europeans in their own travels eastward. This period,
when European trade goods, diseases, and influences became available via native
intermediaries is generally called the "protohistoric" period (Mason
1981:382).

In their hundred years of activity
in Minnesota, the French explored much of the state and surrounding region and
established an extensive network of forts and fur trading posts. These forts
and posts, which were along major bodies of water, were the centers of their
activity. Some of the earliest were built by Daniel Greysolon, sieur du Luth,
in the St. Croix River region and at present day Fort William, in the early
1680s. Many more were built after the French decided to occupy and settle the
Mississippi Valley from north to south in the final years of the seventeenth
century. Among these were posts built by Pierre Charles le Sueur on Madeline
Island in northwestern Wisconsin in 1693, on Prairie Island at the mouth of
the St. Croix River near Red Wing in 1694, and at the mouth of the Blue Earth
River near Mankato in 1700; Fort Beauharnois on Lake Pepin, which was established
by Rene Boucher in the late 1720s; and two posts, Fort La Jonquiere on Lake
Pepin and Fort Duquesne near the present city of Little Falls, which were built
in the 1750s. For the most part, the exact location of these forts and posts
has proven elusive (Birk 1978).

Following the Treaty of Paris in
1763, the British began their half-century of activity in Minnesota (Folwell
1956:53-72). Like the French, their primary interest was exploration and the
fur trade. During this period, the British built many fur trade posts across
the state. It was also the period during which major changes occurred in the
distribution of Native American people in the region. By 1800, the Anishinabe
(Ojibwa), who had been pushing into Minnesota from the northeast, took control
of the lakes and forests of northern Minnesota, and the Dakota (Sioux) had moved
south along the Minnesota River valley and westward into the Dakotas (Treur
1994). Legal possession of the state passed to the United States with the treaty
of peace of 1783 between the British and Americans. However, the United States
did not exert control of the state until Zebulon Pike’s expedition through
the state in 1805-1807 and the establishment of Fort Snelling in 1819 at the
junction of the Minnesota and Mississippi rivers (Pike 1965; Ziebarth and Ominsky
1970; Hall 1987).

The French and British presence
in North America resulted in enormous changes in Native American life ways in
Minnesota and surrounding regions. Among these were: (1) an influx of Native
Americans from the east, who were drawn by trade opportunities or pushed westward
by the Iroquois wars; (2) massive depopulation of native peoples in some areas
because of warfare and newly introduced diseases; (3) a switch from hunting
for subsistence to hunting for trade; (4) a gradual movement southward and westward
by the Dakota (Sioux), and the movement into the northern part of the state
by the Anishinabe (Ojibwa); and, (5) the replacement of many Native American
manufacturing materials (e.g., stone, pottery, bone) by European materials (e.g.,
copper, brass, iron, glass, porcelain). However, activity in the state still
focused primarily on hunting, gathering, and horticulture. Travel and settlement
were still largely restricted to corridors along larger bodies of water.

3.3.3 American
Period

With the dawn of the American period,
Native American and European-American life ways in Minnesota began to change
dramatically. The opening of a commercial sawmill in the village of Marine on
St. Croix in 1839 marked the beginning of the lumbering business in the state.
Minnesota became a Territory in 1849 and the thirty-second state in 1858. All
these changes were accompanied by an ever increasing torrent of European-American
settlement and the establishment of towns, cities, and non fur trade-related
enterprises. The factors that determined the location of Native American settlements
and daily activities became increasingly different from those that had determined
the location of earlier settlements and activities. In addition, the location
of these settlements and activities is increasingly documented in archival records.
For these reasons, the Mn/Model project’s modeling effort was restricted
to archaeological site locations that predate 1837 and the active beginning
of the American period in the state.

An initial assumption in the research
design phase of this project was that it was unlikely that a single model could
adequately predict the location of archaeological resources in all regions of
the state. The primary reason was the environmental and cultural diversity of
the state throughout the precontact and contact periods described in sections
3.2 and 3.3 above. It seemed more likely that predictive
models would have to be formulated for specific regions. Although the state
has been divided into regions by archaeologists several times using different
criteria (Johnson 1969; Minnesota Historical Society 1981; Wilford 1941), it
was decided that the most promising regional framework for the initial model
building phase was the framework suggested by Anfinson (1988, 1990) (Figure
3.10). Among the reasons for this decision were: (1) his nine regions seemed
a pragmatic number for analysis (other frameworks ranged from three to twenty-seven
areas); (2) it is based on features of the natural environment that have been
stable throughout the precontact and contact periods, but especially during
the Late Holocene when most sites in the archaeological database were probably
formed; (3) the regions were thought to exhibit significant internal environmental
and, to some degree, cultural consistency; and (4), although designed for the
precontact period, the framework probably applies as well to the presettlement
contact period.

Anfinson's nine archaeological regions
are based on the assumption that the distribution of natural resources significantly
affected the distribution of precontact Native Americans, which is an assumption
that underlies nearly all contemporary predictive modeling projects (see Section
2.2). Given this assumption, according to Anfinson (1990:138), a regional
framework should (1) reflect the distribution of significant resources, (2)
contain relatively uniform internal environments; and (3) maintain internal
environmental cohesiveness through time. Although the resulting regions would
not bound settlement-subsistence systems, for precontact and contact period
Native Americans were very mobile, it was assumed that the "types of sites,
types of site locations, and even particular types of artifacts" should
be consistent within a region (Anfinson 1990).

This regional framework was developed
over the past 20 years by Scott Anfinson. It was begun while he was employed
by the Minnesota Historical Society as Municipal-County Highway Archaeologist
(Anfinson 1976). He first defined seven environmental or archaeological regions,
based on a series of biophysical variables (i.e. hydrology, topography, geology,
early historic vegetation). A minor modification of this system was made in
1983 by subdividing the northeastern coniferous region into northeast and central
areas, yielding a total of eight regions (Anfinson 1984). The purpose of this
scheme was to assess the archaeological potential and demonstrate differences
in site distributions linked to resource exploitation within each region. Regional
boundaries were based on previously defined physiographic areas and presettlement
vegetation distributions, supplemented by information on lake basins (Anfinson
1984:172). He also described the physical characteristics of each archaeological
or ecological region along with its archaeological record.

Four years later, Anfinson (1988)
refined the system by adjusting regional boundaries and reorganizing the northeastern
part of the state into two regions. Two years later, Anfinson (1990) formally
published the resulting nine-region scheme in connection with the Woodland period,
along with discussions of the physical and precontact cultural characteristics
of each region. Although differences in physiography and mid-nineteenth century
vegetation were discussed in this paper, a shift to emphasizing surface hydrology
(i.e. lakes) in the construction of archaeological regions was made (Anfinson
1990:139, 143). The archaeological regions in this revision remained largely
unchanged from those defined earlier. They retained qualifying terms based on
location, vegetation, and hydrology (e.g. Central Lakes Deciduous, Southeast
Riverine). Later, most regions were divided into subregions on the basis of
river drainage basin or river edge for finer control of intra-regional comparisons
and to create areas of comparable size (Scott Anfinson, personal communication
1998). The following is a description of the process used by Anfinson (1990:139-145)
to divide the state into archaeological regions. It should be noted that the
regions resulting from this most recent discussion are largely unchanged from
his earlier results.

The framework Anfinson developed
is a system of hydrologic regions based on the presence or absence of lakes,
lake morphology, and lake depth. Anfinson began the process of regionalization
by identifying four major areas of the state where there are almost no lakes.
These were the Lake Agassiz plain in northwestern Minnesota, the Lake Superior
shore highland in northeastern Minnesota, the inner Coteau des Prairies in extreme
southwestern Minnesota, and the Rochester Till Plain in southeastern Minnesota
(Figure 3.9). For this, he defined "no-lake"
as an area where there are 0-1 lake basins per township. He then separated the
Lake Agassiz plain into two regions because the history of the eastern arm was
significantly different from the Red River valley area proper (Figure
3.10). Besides being vacated by the glacial lake earlier (ca. 11,300 B.P.
for the eastern arm compared to ca. 9000 B.P. For the Red River valley area),
extensive peatlands began to develop in the eastern arm of the Agassiz basin
by ca. 4000 B.P. A few large, shallow remnant lakes (e.g., Red Lake, Thief Lake)
are present in the eastern arm. The western division was mostly prairie following
the final retreat of Lake Agassiz. The dividing line between the two regions
follows the Campbell beach, a remnant of the last glacial advance between ca.
9900-9500 B.P., extending from central Polk County into central Roseau County,
then straight north to the Canadian border (Figure
3.10).

This process of regionalization
resulted in the identification of five "non lake" regions and one
very large lake region, which was then divided into four smaller regions. A
bedrock lakes region at the far northern end of the Minnesota lake district
was identified that was clearly different from lake regions to the south. Besides
being formed in glacially-eroded bedrock cavities in the Canadian Shield, these
far northern lakes have different bottom profiles and water chemistries, which
has resulted in different floral and faunal compositions (e.g., wild rice is
less abundant and there are different fish species). A below 10 m/over 10 m
lake depth criterion was used to separate the drift-floored lake area to the
south into a shallow lake region in southwestern Minnesota and a deep lake zone
in central Minnesota. Paleoecological studies in northwestern Iowa and northeastern
South Dakota showed that lake levels in this part of north central North America
can drop up to 10 m during periods of severe drought (Van Zant 1979; Watts and
Bright 1968). A dry lake, besides losing its aquatic plants and animals, becomes
an ineffective firebreak.

The deep lake zone of central Minnesota
was divided into two by a watershed line that places the Mississippi Headwaters,
St. Louis River, and Kettle River watersheds in a northern region and the Crow
Wing, Mississippi-Sauk, Crow, Rum, Snake, Lower St. Croix, and Metropolitan
watersheds in a southern region. For much of the precontact period and during
the contact period, the two regions shared many environmental characteristics.
Both were dominated by woodlands, white-tailed deer was the principal game animal
in both, and together they comprised the principal wild rice area of Minnesota.
However, they were separated by significant climatic differences. Coniferous
forests covered the colder northern area. Its lakes were frozen longer throughout
the year, and native corn could not be productively grown. The warmer, more
southern region was covered with deciduous forest, had been overrun by prairie
during the Prairie period, contained bison as an occasional intruder, and was
warm enough to grow corn productively.

The resulting nine regions are:
(1) Southwest Riverine; (2) Prairie Lake; (3) Southeast Riverine; (4) Central
Lakes Deciduous; (5) Central Lakes Coniferous; (6) Red River Valley; (7) Northern
Bog; (8) Border Lakes; and, (9) Lake Superior Shore (Figure 3.10). As Figure
3.10 illustrates, all regions but 1 and 8 are further subdivided into subregions
identified by position within a region, such as 5s (5 south), 5e (5 east), and
5c (5 central). During the development of the framework, the names of regions
4 and 5 have appeared variously as Central Lakes, Central Deciduous Lakes, Central
Lakes Deciduous, Central Coniferous Lakes, and Central Lakes Coniferous, and
the name of Region 2 as Prairie Lake or Prairie Lakes. The terminology adopted
in this project is that recorded on the SHPO archaeological site database guide.

Initial predictive models (Phases
1 and 2) were developed for each of these nine archaeological regions and, in
some cases, their subregions. Because of the importance of environmental characteristics
in the modeling process adopted in the Mn/Model project, the environment of
each region is summarized in some detail in the remainder of this section. In
turn, because of the compactness and completeness of Anfinson's (1990:145-151)
descriptions, they are repeated here in an amended form with permission of the
author and the editor of the series in which they appeared. Since the models
are based on modern environments, characteristics of the Late Holocene and especially
the historic environments of each region are emphasized.

The environmental descriptions are
followed by a review of site location in each region by archaeological tradition
and cultural complex. This review is based primarily on Anfinson (1988, 1990),
who developed the concept of the regions and has written about the archaeological
character of each region. Other pertinent references are included in the text.
Since Anfinson divided precontact Minnesota into three periods in his discussions,
that division is followed here. In his scheme, Minnesota was occupied in the
Early Prehistoric period (ca. 9500-6000 B.C.) by Late Glacial and Early Holocene
hunter-gatherers, whose archaeological cultures belong to the Paleoindian tradition.
The Middle Prehistoric period (ca. 6000-3000 B.C.) corresponds with the Prairie
period and was dominated by Early Archaic hunter-gatherers. The beginning of
the Late Prehistoric period (ca. 3000 B.C. - A.D. 1650) is marked by the appearance
of modern (Late Holocene) climatic and environmental conditions, and the presence
of Late Archaic Woodland, and Mississippian archaeological cultures. Anfinson's
three environmental divisions should not be confused with Johnson's (1988) Early,
Middle, and Late prehistoric periods, which are based on cultural factors, such
as the presence of ceramics, earthen burial mounds, and maize horticulture.
This review serves the purpose of establishing a baseline of lore about the
location of site types within a cultural historical framework for each archaeological
region. This baseline can be used to generate hypotheses of settlement systems
for Minnesota's past archaeological cultures that can be tested using the Mn/Model
database and used to support interpretation of the statistical models.

Located in the extreme southwestern
corner of Minnesota, Region 1 includes all of Rock County, large parts of Pipestone
and Nobles counties, and small portions of Lincoln and Murray counties. It is
the smallest archaeological region in Minnesota, although it is part of a larger
out-state region that includes portions of northwestern Iowa and southeastern
South Dakota.

Bedrock outcrops of Sioux Quartzite
are common in the western part of the region. While there are no outcrops of
lithic materials of good flaking quality for chipped stone tools, occasional
exposures of Catlinite, a soft, clay-rich stone produced from chemically weathered
quartzite, were mined by Native Americans to make pipes and plaques. The region
was not glaciated in the Late Wisconsin. Extensive loess deposition during the
Late Pleistocene covered pre-Late Wisconsin grey till and contributed to the
formation of soils dominated by fine silty loams.

Rock River is the major drainage-way.
It flows south to connect with the Missouri River system. Many small but deeply
entrenched creeks (e.g., Split Rock, Pipestone) flow to the southwest. There
are 140-160 average annual frost-free days and the average annual precipitation
is 24-26 inches. The last spring frost occurs in early May and the first fall
frost at the end of September. The daily temperature highs average about 85
degrees F in July and about 24 degrees F in January.

At the time of European-American
settlement, Region 1 featured tallgrass prairie vegetation and a stream-dissected
landscape without lakes. Trees were scarce due to regular prairie fires and
occasional droughts, but some woody vegetation was present along the major streams
and at favorable topographic breaks. The largest woods were along the Rock River
in south central Rock County. These were typical river bottom forests dominated
by elm, ash, and cottonwood.

Major game animals at the time of
European-American settlement included bison, elk, and smaller upland mammals.
The only common game bird in the Late Holocene may have been the sharp-tailed
grouse; waterfowl were not abundant because of the lack of extensive wetlands.
Fish were not a major resource in Region 1 due to the lack of lakes and multiple
large rivers. Seasonally available prairie plants included the prairie turnip
(Psoralea esculenta) and the ground plum (Astragalus caryocarpus).

During the Early Prehistoric period
(9500-6000 B.C.), The Southwest Riverine Region was covered with an open boreal
forest that was gradually replaced by a deciduous forest towards the end of
the period. At present, no Early Prehistoric sites or isolated artifacts, such
as fluted or Plano projectile points are recorded in the SHPO archaeological
database for this area. Early Prehistoric sites are most likely located along
streams and adjacent to glacial features, such as meltwater channels and pro-glacial
lakeshores. If sites from these small numbers of mobile hunter-gatherers are
present in the region, they may be deeply buried in river valley alluvium or
loess.

Recorded Middle Prehistoric period
(6000-3000 B.C.) sites are rare here. Plants of the short-grass prairie and
large bison herds were present in this region during the Prairie period. The great majority of the sites recorded in the Southwest Riverine Region are
probably associated with the Late Prehistoric period (3000 B.C. – A.D.
1650), when the climate was wetter and possibly cooler than during the Prairie
period. Large base camps and winter camps were probably uncommon during this
period because of a lack of large woods and a sufficiently diverse subsistence
resource base. The habitation sites that were present seem clustered along the
Rock River, where the region's greatest concentration of wood and water occurred.
It is possible that Late Prehistoric period habitation sites are under represented
in the archaeological database, for some could be buried under alluvium. For
at least part of this period, temporary Plains Village and Oneota campsites
associated with the Pipestone Quarries (21PP2) should be present along rivers
and streams.

Because ceramics are rare in the
Southwest Riverine Region, it is difficult to associate components with ceramic-producing
Woodland, Oneota, and Plains Village complexes. Artifacts collected during most
surveys are almost exclusively lithic debitage. Gibbon and Hruby (1983) used
cluster and discriminate analysis to generate tentative associations between
samples of lithic debitage and particular functions, spaces, and time periods.
Their analysis indicated that Archaic sites are widely distributed throughout the Rock River drainage in Minnesota.
While the largest Archaic sites occur on terraces, bluffs, and particularly
hilltops with panoramic views, they also occur on many other kinds of landforms.
Hunting and butchering seem to have been the primary activities taking place
at Archaic sites. Woodland and Mississippian sites (identified by the presence
of Sioux Quartzite among the raw materials) could not be differentiated because
of the absence of ceramics. Sites of this category are located on bluffs and
terraces along permanent water courses, especially the Rock River. Although
these were temporary rather than permanent settlements, a variety of activities
apparently occurred there. Special activity sites ('lithic scatters') seem located
in all topographic settings during all time periods.

The interior topography of Region
2 is the typical swell and swale topography of a ground moraine. Hilly end moraines
are found along northern, eastern, and southern edges. The major topographic
features are the Minnesota River trench, which bisects the region southwest
to northeast, and the scarp of the Prairie des Coteau highland in the west.
Lake basins are numerous and vary greatly in size. All of the lakes are shallow,
with none exceeding 10 m in depth. Most of the major rivers of the Prairie Lake
region empty into the Minnesota River from the north or south. Exceptions are
the Shell Rock River in the southeast, which flows south to the Cedar River
in Iowa, and the south fork of the Crow River in the northeast and the headwaters
of the Cannon River in the east central area, which flow east into the Mississippi
River.

Soils are medium to fine textured
prairie soils in the central and western part of the region, and fine to medium
textured prairie border soils in the east. Climatically, precipitation ranges
from 28 inches per year in the southeast to 22 inches per year in the northwest.
Temperature ranges and growing season are about the same as those in Region
1, although it is cooler in the northwest. Lakes freeze over by early December
and are ice-free by early April. Bedrock outcrops are rare in the Prairie Lake
Region, especially deposits of good-quality rock for chipped stone tools. In
the eastern part of the region, occasional outcrops of Paleozoic rocks near
the confluence of the Blue Earth and Minnesota Rivers include some deposits
of high quality chert. In the western part, there are outcrops of Sioux Quartzite
in Cottonwood County. Granites and poorly consolidated Cretaceous rocks, such
as shales, are found in the Minnesota River valley.

At the time of European-American
settlement, the region was covered with tallgrass prairie. Trees were uncommon
in the western part of the region, but there were narrow river-bottom forests
and oak woods along the major river valleys and small patches of woodland in
fire-protected areas (peninsulas, islands, isthmuses) at major lakes. The Minnesota
River valley contained the principal wood resources for the western part of
the region. The eastern part contained extensive Big Woods vegetation in the
north and oak parkland in the south. The oak woodland was very patchy with large
prairie openings becoming more numerous to the west. While the modern prairie-forest
border was established by the beginning of Initial Woodland times, extensive
development of Big Woods vegetation (elm, maple, basswood) did not take place
until the contact period; oak woodlands were present all along the eastern edge
of the region until about 300 years ago.

Bison was the dominant upland fauna
for the Prairie Lake region in the Late Holocene period, with occasional large
elk herds also present. White-tailed deer were found along the Minnesota River
valley and in the eastern woodland fringe. The major faunal differences between
the two southwestern prairie regions are due to the many shallow lakes in Region
2. These lakes promote extensive populations of aquatic mammals (e.g., muskrats),
waterfowl, and fish. They also contain a rich floral assemblage that includes
such edible plants as water lilies and cattails. Wild rice was present in Region
2, but it was not extensive; it was primarily limited to the Minnesota River
valley and a few northern and eastern lakes. Upland floral resources include
the prairie turnip, the ground plum, and acorns in the oak woods.

While Early Prehistoric period sites
have not been professionally excavated in the Prairie Lakes Region, the remains
of fluted (Clovis, Folsom) and Plano (Browns Valley, Agate Basin, Hell Gate)projectile points are relatively common. It is possible that sites associated
with the Early and Middle Prehistoric periods are deeply buried in colluvium
and river valley alluvium, especially in the Minnesota River valley. Middle
Prehistoric period sites are not common, but some, such as 21BW5/7, 21CO2, 21LN2,
and 21YM35, have been excavated. During the Prairie period, subsistence seems
to have focused on pedestrian bison hunting. Anfinson (1987) has identified
two phases in this period, the Cherokee (ca. 7000-5500 B.C.) And the Itasca
(ca. 5500-3000 B.C.). Some early Middle Prehistoric period sites may be on lake
bottoms, since most lakes shrank drastically during the Prairie period. In the
Late Archaic, with the onset of wetter climatic conditions, subsistence diversified
and the aquatic resources of the prairie lakes became an important subsistence
focus. Anfinson has assigned Late Archaic components in this region to the Mountain
Lake phase (ca. 3000-200 B.C.). These later Middle Prehistoric period sites,
like Woodland sites, are located for the most part on islands and peninsulas
on moderate to large-sized lakes; some villages are also located along the major
rivers. As with later Woodland sites, winter villages are most likely located
in wooded and sheltered areas in large river valleys.

The first widespread and readily
visible evidence for Native American occupation of the Prairie Lakes Region
occurs late in the Middle Prehistoric period with the appearance of the Woodland
tradition. Initial Woodland Fox Lake phase and Terminal Woodland Lake Benton
phase ceramics seem indigenous to the region, while external Havanoid, St. Croix,
Onamia, Kathio, and Sandy Lake ceramics are also present. Woodland base camps
(identified by the presence of cord-marked pottery) are common and occur, for
the most part, on islands or peninsulas on moderate to large-sized lakes throughout
the region. Deeply buried Woodland sites, especially winter villages, may be
deeply buried in the Minnesota River valley flood plain and along its major
tributaries. Temporary campsites and special activity sites ('lithic scatters')
occur in fairly large numbers along the rivers and around the lakes of the region.

The most visible Late Prehistoric
period site type in the Prairie Lakes Region is the large agricultural village
site, most of which are located on intermediate terraces of the Minnesota and
Blue Earth rivers. Late Prehistoric period phases in the region include the
Plains Village (Cambria, Great Oasis) and Oneota (Blue Earth). Large Cambria
villages are largely confined to the Minnesota River valley and Oneota villages
to the Blue Earth River valley (Anfinson 1987). Small campsites and special
activity sites from this period are scattered throughout the region, but especially
on former Woodland sites on the islands and peninsulas of moderate to large-size
lakes. Some deeply buried Late Prehistoric period sites could be present in
the Minnesota River valley.

Contact period sites in the Prairie
Lakes Region are primarily associated with the Yankton Dakota at the time of
contact (ca. 1700), with the Wahpeton and Sisseton Dakota by the early 1800s,
and with French, English, and American fur and wintering posts. Major Dakota
villages were concentrated along the Minnesota River. Posts were concentrated
for the most part along the upper Minnesota River between 1750-1800. By the
early 1800s they were established by American traders at wooded locations in
the interior.

Most of southeastern Minnesota is
in this region, which includes Dodge, Fillmore, Goodhue, Houston, Mower, Olmsted,
Wabasha, and Winona counties, and portions of Dakota, Freeborn, Rice, and Waseca
counties. The region continues into the adjacent corners of Wisconsin and Iowa.

Region 3, which was not glaciated
during the Late Wisconsin Ice Age, is characterized by stream-dissected terrain.
No natural lakes are found in the region's interior, although valley bottom
lakes, some quite large (e.g., Lake Pepin), are found along the Mississippi
River. Three major river systems extend westward from the Mississippi into the
region's interior: the Cannon, the Zumbro, and the Root.

The climate of Region 3 is the mildest
in the state with a growing season of at least 160 days per year. The mean January
high temperature is about 23 degrees F and the mean July high temperature is
about 85 degrees F. Average annual precipitation varies between 28 and 30 inches.
The western part of the region has medium textured prairie and prairie border
soils, while the eastern part has fine textured forest and prairie soils formed
on loess deposits over Paleozoic bedrock.

The Southeast Riverine region has
extensive rock outcrops containing occasional primary and secondary lag deposits
of high quality flaking materials. Chert concentrations are found not only along
the Mississippi River valley, but also just below the surface in less-dissected
areas in the western part of the region.

In Late Holocene times, forests
of elm, ash, and cottonwood lined the river lowlands. Big Woods forests of maple,
elm, and basswood occupied the uplands near the Mississippi River. Patches of
oak groves in the prairie, often described as "oak barrens," were
scattered across the western part of the region. The middle of the region was
a more open prairie.

Late Holocene subsistence resources
in this region included deer, elk, and scattered bison in the uplands and mussels,
fish, and waterfowl in the rich bottom lands. Edible plants would have included
water lilies and other aquatic flora, and upland plants like the prairie turnip.
Extensive oak woods would have been a rich source of acorns. The region's favorable
climate and extensive bottom lands fostered Terminal Woodland period horticulture.

Only a few Early Prehistoric period
components are recorded in the Southeast Riverine Region archaeological database.
As in other regions, they are primarily from surface collections of Paleoindian
projectile points. A few fluted points have been reported from the extreme southeastern
corner of the region and narrow, leaf-shaped Plano points (e.g., Agate Basin)
have been located in those counties bordering the Mississippi River Valley.
Patterns of site location for this period are unknown, but Plano points seem
to be concentrated in areas away from the main valley. Many sites of all periods
may be deeply buried in floodplain alluvium in this region. Some Archaic Middle
Prehistoric period sites have been excavated (e.g., 21WB56, 21WN15, 21WN1).
In general, Archaic complexes in at least the eastern portion of the region
have their closest similarities with complexes in Wisconsin, as reflected in
projectile point styles, such as Durst Stemmed, Osceola, and Raddatz Side Notched.
An example of a site of this period whose components are deeply buried in an
alluvial fan is King Coulee, where deposits extend at least 14 feet below the
surface and cucurbit seeds have been dated to 1750 B.C. (Perkl 1996).

The appearance of Woodland sites
in the latter portion of the Middle Prehistoric period is associated with the
first archaeological evidence of intensive human occupation of the region. In
contrast to Early Prehistoric period sites, Archaic and Woodland habitation
sites seem concentrated along the Mississippi River in a variety of settings,
including bluff tops, rock shelters, caves, terraces, and on stream deltas and
knolls in the flood plain. Large Woodland village sites are rare in the western
section of the region and in the interior in general. As in the Archaic, Woodland
cultural connections are generally to the south and east, as is evident in the
presence of Marion Thick-like, Havanoid, and Effigy Mound ceramics (Perkl 1996).

The most visible Late Prehistoric
period sites are large, probably palisaded, horticultural villages and thousands
of earthen burial mounds in the Red Wing area at the juncture of the Mississippi
and Cannon rivers. This locality was a focus of Effigy Mound (ca. A.D. 550-1200)
and Mississippian (ca. A.D. 1100-1300) activity. Both Woodland Effigy Mound
and Mississippian tradition (the Silvernale phase) are concentrated in the Southeast
Riverine Region. Large Silvernale phase horticultural villages are located on
terraces above the floodplain in the Red Wing area. Some later Blue Earth-related
Oneota components are also present in the Red Wing area. Late Prehistoric period
sites are uncommon in the interior, except for later Orr phase Oneota village
sites, which are concentrated along a tributary of the Root River.

The Orr phase villages of the southeastern
corner of the region were occupied into the Contact period, as is evident from
the presence of trade goods. At this time, the Ioway and possibly the Oto occupied
the southern part of the Southeast Riverine Region, while the Santee Dakota
had gained control of the northern part. After about 1750, historic Santee villages
were established in the region at Red Wing, Winona, and elsewhere, generally
in the same locations in which Euro Americans settlements were later established,
that is, along the Mississippi River and its major tributaries. By the late
1600s, French explorers, missionaries, and traders were building posts along
the Mississippi River. By the late 1700s, Anglo-American trading posts were
established in the interior, particularly in the northern part of the region.

The topography of Region 4 is a
patchwork of moraines, till plains, and outwash plains. Many lakes are found
throughout the region, some reaching depths of more than 30 m (100 feet). The
Mississippi River flows through the eastern and central parts of the region,
with the St. Croix River forming the eastern boundary. Streams flowing west
into the Red River drain the western part.

The climate varies throughout the
region with greater precipitation in the east and higher temperatures in the
south. Average annual precipitation ranges from 22 to 28 inches. Average January
highs range from 12 to 24 degrees F, while average July highs range from 78
to 82 degrees F. The frost-free season lasts up to 160 days in the south and
up to 140 days in the north. The northern part of the region may have been unsuitable
for growing most precontact varieties of maize.

The soils of Region 4 reflect a
diverse glacial and vegetal history. Most have medium to coarse textures, with
prairie soils in the south and west and forest soil in the north and east. Bedrock
outcrops are limited to occasional granite rock exposures in the region's center
and eastern edge.

In the contact period, the vegetation
in the southern and western parts of the region was dominated by Big Woods species
with many large inclusions of prairie and oak woods. As in Region 2, the development
of extensive Big Woods forests was a recent event and much of the Big Woods
area was probably oak forest during the Late Holocene. Oak forest was still
dominant in the east at the time of White settlement. The northern part of the
region was a mixed deciduous-coniferous forest dominated by pine.

Late Holocene period subsistence
resources of Region 4 would have included white-tailed deer throughout the region,
small herds of bison and elk in the south and west, and beaver, bear, and even
moose in the north and east. Fish and waterfowl would have been plentiful. Wild
rice beds were extensive throughout most of the region. Acorns would have been
an abundant food resource.

Early Prehistoric period settlement
patterns are poorly known in the Central Lakes Deciduous region, because the
artifactual evidence is limited and consists for the most part of projectile
points in surface collections. However, lakes and major rivers were apparently
a focus of activity. A concentration of fluted points has been found at the
A. H. Anderson site (21AN8) on Howard Lake in Anoka County, and Plano points
have been found throughout the region. More western stemmed forms (e.g., Hell
Gap) seem concentrated in the western part of the region, and more eastern narrow
leaf and broad concave base forms (e.g., Eden, Angostura) in the east.

Early Middle Prehistoric period
site location patterns are also poorly known, but again sites seem associated
with lakes and major rivers. Examples are Petaga Point (21ML11), which is near
the Lake Mille Lacs - Rum River juncture, and the Pine City sites along the
Snake River in Pine County (Bleed 1969; Caine 1974). Some Archaic burials (21GR4,
21PO3, 21PO13) may occur in the western part of the region.

A major shift in subsistence-settlement
pattern and technology occurred in the region during the late Middle Prehistoric
period. Ceramics and mound burial were adopted by ca. 200 B.C., The bow and
arrow by ca. A.D. 500, and wild rice harvesting began to be intensified. As
the broad-based hunting and gathering focus of the early Late Holocene was replaced
by a more focal concentration on wild rice, habitation sites became larger,
the human population may have increased dramatically in size, and people became
less nomadic. Larger village sites are now concentrated on major lakes in contrast
to the more diffuse pattern of the early Middle Prehistoric period. Smaller
campsites and special activity sites are also found along major rivers and larger
lakes. The most common Woodland ceramic complexes in the region are Malmo, Howard
Lake, Brainerd, St. Croix, Onamia, Blackduck, Kathio, and Clam River, with Brainerd
and Blackduck concentrated in the northwestern portion and the rest in the eastern.

A major concentration of population
occurred in this region in the Late Prehistoric period (Gibbon 1994). Late Middle
Prehistoric period pottery is found in numerous small sites in lakeshore settings
throughout the region. In contrast, Late Prehistoric period villages, which
are associated with Sandy Lake pottery in the northern half of the region, Oneota
ceramics in the southern half, and Plains Village ceramics in the southwest
corner, indicate large agglomerations of people. Large areas of the Central
Lakes Deciduous Region were probably now used only for periodic resource procurement
forays. In wild rice harvesting areas, villages are located near wild rice beds,
such as stream inlets/outlets to lakes.

At contact, Santee Dakota groups
controlled the eastern part of the Central Lakes Deciduous Region and the Yankton,
Yanktonai, and other Dakota groups controlled the western part. By the mid-1700s,
the Ojibwa had begun to move into the northern parts of the region and controlled
this section of the Central Lakes Deciduous Region by the early 1800s. During
this period of strife, much of the southern portion of the region remained unoccupied.
In general, however, historic Indian village locations followed the Late Prehistoric
period pattern and are often located near wild rice beds. By the late 1600s,
French traders had entered the region and established posts on some major lakes
and rivers, a pattern generally followed by later Anglo-American traders. The
contact period as defined in this review ends with the establishment of the
Americansettlement at Fort Snelling in 1821.

Located in central and northeastern
Minnesota, Region 5 contains portions of Aitkin, Beltrami, Carlton, Cass, Clearwater,
Crow Wing, Hubbard, Itasca, Kanabec, Koochiching, Lake, and St. Louis counties.
The region incorporates much of what has been called the Headwaters Lakes region.

Region 5 is very similar to Region
4, especially regarding lake morphology. It can, however, be differentiated
from Region 4 not only by vegetation and watersheds, but by topography. Hilly
terminal moraines extend through the region's center and a variety of less rugged
terrain of glacial origin cover the rest of the region, including ground moraines,
outwash plains, and lake plains.

The Mississippi River traverses
much of Region 5, flowing through or near several large lakes as it leaves its
source in southeastern Clearwater County. The path of the Mississippi has changed
significantly over the last 12,000 years, although by the beginning of the Late
Holocene period it followed what is essentially its modern route. The western
part of the region is drained by rivers flowing into the Red River, the northeast
part is drained by the St. Louis River, which flows into Lake Superior, and
the southeast part is drained by rivers flowing into the St. Croix River. Lake
distribution in most of the region is very dense, with only the Glacial Lakes
Upham-Aitkin plain lacking lakes (Figure 3.3).
Many lakes are quite deep.

Average annual precipitation varies
from 22 inches in the west to 28 inches in the east. Average July high temperatures
are 74 to 78 degrees F, and average January high temperatures are 16 to 20 degrees
F. The frost-free growing season ranges from 140 to less than 120 days. None
of the region is suitable for intensive corn production. Lakes freeze over in
mid-November and the ice is off the lakes by late April.

Soil types vary greatly but are
generally coarse to medium textured forest soils. Fine textured soils and peat
deposits are present in the northeastern part of the region on the Glacial Lakes
Upham-Aitkin lakebed. Bedrock exposures are rare. Precambrian outcrops are found
in the northeast, along with taconite deposits that contain some high quality
flaking materials (e.g., chert, jasper, taconite).

Late Holocene faunal resources included
deer, beaver, moose, and black bear. Fish and waterfowl were abundant in the
many lakes and rivers. Wild rice was an important part of the economy in Terminal
Woodland times.

As in the Central Lakes Deciduous
Region, Early Prehistoric period settlement patterns are poorly understood,
but sites near lakes seem to have been a focus of activity. A few fluted points
have been found in the region, with the state's only excavated fluted point
(a Folsom point) recovered at the Williams Narrows site (21IC23). Plano points
are more common and appear to be concentrated in the northeast section of the
region. An especially large concentration was found in the Reservoir Lakes area
northwest of Duluth (Harrison et al. 1995). Late Paleoindian components may
also be present at the Patrow site (21IC31) and at White Oak Point (21IC1).

Middle Prehistoric period Archaic
and Woodland sites follow the pattern of the Central Lakes Deciduous Region
in that village sites are located on major lakes and smaller sites on major
rivers and around lakeshores. Very few sites occur in the interior. Archaic
sites in this region have also been found along abandoned channels of the Mississippi
River. An example is the large Eckstrom site (21BL40) on the south side of Lake
Andrusia. The Itasca Bison site (21CE1) is an example of a buried bison kill
site that dates to this period (ca. 7000 B.P.). The site is in a short creek
that connects Lakes Elk and Itasca in Itasca State Park. Late Middle Prehistoric
period subsistence and settlement pattern trends were similar to those of the
Central Lakes Deciduous Region. Brainerd is the most common early ceramic. Burial
mounds may not have been constructed in the region until ca. A.D. 700.

Late Prehistoric period Blackduck
and Sandy Lake Woodland sites are numerous throughout the region, with a concentration
in the Headwaters region in the central part of the Central Lakes Coniferous
Region. Site location patterns are similar to those in the Central Lakes Deciduous
Region. That is, with an increasing focus of wild rice harvesting, people become
concentrated in larger villages often located on major lakes near wild rice
beds.

At contact, the Santee Dakota were
in the eastern part of the region and the Yanktonai in the west. By 1800, the
Ojibwa controlled the entire region. Although French traders apparently did
not establish posts in this region, Anglo-American fur posts were common throughout
the region by the late 1700s, with a concentration along the Mississippi River.

Region 6 is in northwestern Minnesota.
It contains Clay, Kittson, Norman, and Wilkin counties, and portions of Marshall,
Pennington, Polk, Red Lake, Roseau, and Traverse counties. The region's eastern
boundary in the south is defined by the Herman beach ridge and in the north
by the Campbell beach ridge. The region extends into eastern North Dakota and
southeastern Manitoba.

The flat plain of Glacial Lake Agassiz
is dominant in Region 6. Bands of beach ridges are the only features of topographic
relief. The soils tend to be fine in texture near the Red River, with coarser
soils to the east on the beach ridges. While there are no bedrock outcrops in
the Red River Valley region, lithic resources are available in beach ridge cobble
deposits throughout the eastern part of the region. These are most accessible
where rivers have cut through the beaches.

The entire region is within the
Red River drainage basin. Many west-flowing rivers intersect the north-flowing
Red. While lake basins are absent, at the time of European-American settlement
there were many shallow marshes many of which dried up by late summer. Most
of these marshes are now drained. Lake Traverse at the southern end of the region,
while technically in the Red River trench, is excluded from the region as it
has a better fit with the Prairie Lake Region.

Average annual precipitation ranges
from 20 to 22 inches. The frost-free season is about 140 days in the south and
less than 120 days in the north. July high temperatures average between 82 and
86 degrees F. January high temperatures are more regionally inconsistent, ranging
from 24 degrees in the south to less than 12 degrees F in the north.

The vegetation at the time of European-American
settlement was largely tallgrass prairie with river bottom forests (elm, ash,
cottonwood) along the Red River and its major tributaries, and an irregular
band of aspen-oak forest or aspen parkland along the northeastern edge.

The major faunal resource during
the Late Holocene period was bison, which were present along the Red River in
very large herds. Large elk herds were also reported in the contact period.
Near the eastern edge of the region, deer were available and in the northeast,
moose and even woodland caribou were present. Some fish and mussels were available
in the Red River and its major tributaries. Waterfowl would have been seasonally
abundant on the shallow marshes. Vegetal foods would have included various prairie
species (e.g., prairie turnip), marsh plants (e.g., cattails), and berries and
nuts from the riparian forests.

3.4.6.1 Red River Valley Site
Locations by Archaeological Tradition and Cultural Complex

Since the Red River Valley Region
was covered with water during the early Early Prehistoric period, no fluted
points have been found in this area. However, Plano points have been recovered
from the beach ridges in the eastern portion and may be present in the Agassiz
Plain. An example of a beach ridge site is Greenbush (21RO11), which may have
been a Late Paleoindian lithic workshop. Middle Prehistoric period Archaic sites
are the first evidence of widespread occupation of the Red River Valley. Like
late Early Prehistoric period components, many Archaic components are presumably
buried by over a meter of alluvium in the river valley. Several such sites have
been excavated (21NR9, 21NR29) (Michlovich 1986, 1987). The primary subsistence
activity was bison hunting. Archaic habitation sites are concentrated on beach
ridges.

Scattered evidence of Woodland habitation
sites has been found at higher elevations along the Red River. Ceramics associated
with these sites include Laurel, St. Croix, and Blackduck, with Laurel and Blackduck
concentrated in the north and east parts of the region. These occupations may
have been associated with seasonal bison hunting by otherwise woodland peoples.
Earlier Woodland habitation sites, such as Lake Bronson (21KT1), may occur on
beach ridges through the region. A similar pattern is present in the Late Prehistoric
period in association with Sandy Lake ceramics, although some horticulture seems
to have been practiced as well. There is a tendency for Late Woodland sites
to be located on meander loops in the Red River Valley.

At contact, the western Dakota Teton
and Yanktonai controlled the entire region except the far north, which was occupied
by the Assiniboine. By 1800, the Yanktonai controlled the southern area and
the Ojibwa the northern. British and American fur posts were located along the
Red River as far south as Lake Traverse. Some posts were located inland along
major tributaries.

Region 7 is in north central Minnesota.
It contains Lake of the Woods and portions of Beltrami, Clearwater, Koochiching,
Marshall, Pennington, Polk, Red Lake, and Roseau counties.

The region encompasses what is known
as the eastern or Beltrami arm of Glacial Lake Agassiz. Peatlands cover most
of the eastern two-thirds of the region. Poorly defined, discontinuous beach
ridges occasionally interrupt the generally level topography. Remains of low
recessional moraines are also present and reworked into boulder-strewn beach
deposits by Lake Agassiz.

Outcrops of Precambrian bedrock
occur around Lake of the Woods, along the Rainy River, and in eastern Koochiching
County. Several meters of lake sediments and up to 30 m of glacial drift cover
most of the bedrock. All but the western edge of the region contains peaty soils.
The western soils are fine to coarse prairie soils.

Lakes and transecting rivers are
generally absent from the region's core. Several large, shallow lakes that are
remnants of Lake Agassiz (Red, Lake of the Woods, Thief, Mud) are present in
the west. North-flowing rivers, which intersect the west-flowing Rainy River
at the northern edge of the region, include the Roseau, Warroad, Rapid, Little
Fork, and Big Fork. The southwestern part of the region is drained by the headwaters
of rivers flowing west to the Red River.

Average annual precipitation ranges
from 20 inches in the west to 26 inches in the east. Average July high temperatures
are 74 to 78 degrees F and average January highs range from less than 12 degrees
F in the west to 16 degrees F in the east. The annual frost-free season is less
than 120 days. Lake of the Woods freezes over in late November and the ice is
out by late April.

About 4000 years ago in response
to a cooler, wetter climate, large areas of prairie vegetation turned into marshes
and peatlands. The peatlands have a developmental progression from cattail marshes,
to sedge meadows and heath bogs, and eventually to sphagnum moss. Bog conifers,
such as spruce, tamarack, cedar, and balsam, are found on the uplands. The western
third of the region could be characterized, in contact period times, as a wet
prairie with patches of aspen and oak woodlands.

Late Holocene period game animals
included deer, moose, caribou, beaver, and black bear. Some bison were present
in the west. Fish were abundant in Red Lake, Lake of the Woods, and the major
rivers. Waterfowl were seasonally abundant. Wild rice was present in the region,
though not as abundant as in the lake regions to the south.

As in other regions, the Early Prehistoric
period is the least well-known. Some Plano points have been found on the region's
northern edge along the Rainy River, but fluted points have not been reported
for the region. Sites dating to this period could be associated with glacial
lake beaches. Middle Prehistoric period Archaic sites have different subsistence-settlement
orientations, with those in the east (e.g., 21KC6) having a forest-oriented
economy and those in the west (e.g., 21RO7) a bison-hunting focus. Like earlier
sites, many Middle Prehistoric period Archaic sites could be buried in the interior
peatlands.

Later Woodland sites were located
at good fishing and hunting locations along major rivers and around the few
lakes of the region. By at least 200 B.C., spring sturgeon fishing may have
become a particularly important regional activity. The confluences of rivers,
and rivers and lakes, at the edges of the region seem to have been preferred
site locations, with the eastern Rainy River an especially important focus of
activity. Many Archaic and Woodland components are probably deeply buried in
alluvial strata at confluences along the Rainy River, as has been demonstrated
by excavations at the McKinstry and Hannaford sites. Temporary campsites and
special activity sites should be present in the interior peatlands of the region,
but large habitation sites should be absent. Summer bison hunts may have occurred
in the western part of the region.

A similar subsistence-settlement
concentration continued into the Late Prehistoric period, although wild rice
harvesting probably became important at the few wild rice lakes in the region.
At contact, the Dakota, Cree, and Assiniboine were using the Northern Bog Region,
but by 1750 it was controlled by the Ojibwa. French posts were on the Lake of
the Woods and along the Rainy River in the early 1700s. Anglo-American posts
were located in similar areas, but also along the Roseau River and at Red Lakes.
Throughout the Contact period, activity was concentrated along the major lakes
and rivers of the region.

This region is in northeastern Minnesota
and occupies northern Cook, Lake, and St. Louis counties; a small portion extends
into extreme eastern Koochiching County to include Nett Lake and the western
arm of Rainy Lake. It also extends into the immediately adjacent portion of
Ontario where Quetico Provincial Park is today.

Much of the terrain is rugged due
to abundant outcrops of ice-scoured Precambrian bedrock. Lake distribution is
dense. The lakes are formed in bedrock basins scooped out of the bedrock by
glacial action. High quality chert flaking materials outcrop at various locations
in the region associated with the Gunflint and Vermilion iron formations. Patches
of thin, coarse to finely textured forest soils are found in most of the region
with peaty soils in the far west. The Rainy River drains the west and central
parts of the region and the Pigeon River drains the eastern part.

Average annual precipitation varies
from 26 inches in the west to 30 inches in the northeastern corner. The frost-free
season is less than 120 days. July high temperatures range from 80 degrees F
in the west to less than 74 degrees F in the east. January high temperatures
range from 12 degrees F in the west to 20 degrees F in the east. Lakes freeze
over in mid-November and are free of ice by the beginning of May. Winter snowfalls
average more than 70 inches in much of the region with snow covering the ground
for more than 140 days.

In the Late Holocene, a coniferous
forest dominated by spruce and pine covered the region, but there were many
inclusions of birch and aspen. Animals would have included deer, moose, caribou,
beaver, and bear. Many fish were available in the lakes and rivers, and waterfowl
were seasonally abundant. Large stands of wild rice are not common, although
a few are currently present in the southwest near Nett Lake and along the eastern
edge of the region.

Plano points in this region appear
to be associated with lithic quarries. No fluted points are recorded in the
SHPO database. Late Paleoindian components in the region, which are considered
part of the Lakehead complex in adjacent Ontario, would be part of a caribou
hunting focus. This was one of the few areas in the state covered with an open
tundra environment. The few recorded Archaic habitation sites in the region
are associated with lakes and extensive copper working. Houska Point (21KC6),
at the outlet of Rainy River on Rainy Lake, and the Fowl Lake site (21CK1),
in the northeast corner of the region, contain Late Paleoindian lanceolate points
as well as extensive Archaic deposits. Another site in which copper artifacts
were manufactured is Pickerel Lake, just across the U.S.-Canadian border in
Quetico Provincial Park (Steinbring 1970, 1975; Gibbon 1996). Like Late Paleoindian
sites, Archaic sites tend to occur on peninsulas and islands in lakes, often
near quarries.

As in most other regions of Minnesota,
the first widespread occupation of the Border Lakes Region seems to have been
associated with the Woodland tradition. The earliest ceramics are associated
with the Laurel complex and the more recent with Blackduck, Selkirk, and Sandy
Lake. In general, subsistence in this region remained a broad-based hunting-fishing-gathering
adaptation until contact, with the more diffuse settlement locations associated
with this kind of adaptation. Most Woodland sites are small and temporary. They
increase in number from east to west across the Superior National Forest. This
density cline may be related to the increasing availability of wild rice to
the west. In the Late Prehistoric period, wild rice harvesting became important
in some areas in the western part of the region, with larger sites concentrating
in these areas. Concentrations of Woodland habitation sites are present at Nett
Lake in the southwest and Lake Vermilion in the south central part of the region.
In the northwest section of the region, most Woodland habitation sites, and
especially Late Prehistoric period Woodland sites, appear to be located near
major bodies of water. In general, Woodland base camps are located near resource
concentrations, such as wild rice beds and good fishing spots.

During the Contact period, the Ojibwa
controlled the Border Lakes Region, although the Assiniboine and Cree occupied
the region at contact. French traders canoed down the major water routes along
the northern edge of the region and constructed posts at larger lakes, such
as Rainy Lake, Little Vermilion Lake, and Basswood Lake. By the early 1800s,
the British had posts at these and other lakes in the region, such as Vermilion
Lake and Moose Lake.

This region borders Lake Superior
in extreme northeastern Minnesota. It contains the eastern edges of Carlton,
Cook, Lake, and St. Louis counties. The region extends along Lake Superior into
Ontario as far as Thunder Bay.

The Lake Superior shore has rocky
cliffs with many small bays and points. Abundant Precambrian bedrock exposures
are present, making waterfalls common as short streams and rivers descend the
900-1500 foot drop down the eastern slope of the highland to Lake Superior.
In contrast, the southern tip of the region is the flat plain of Glacial Lake
Duluth, which is drained by the St. Louis and Nemadji rivers. Fine to coarse
textured forest soils are scattered between the rock outcrops, with fine silty
and clayey soils on the glacial lake plain in the southwest. Copper nuggets
can be found throughout the region.

The climate of the Lake Superior
Shore is more moderate than adjacent regions to the west due to the "lake
effect". The frost-free season averages between 120 and 140 days. July
high temperatures are generally 75 degrees F or less. January highs range from
20 to 24 degrees F. Annual precipitation averages between 29 and 30 inches.
Lake Superior occasionally freezes in very cold winters.

Late Holocene period vegetation
in Region 9 was dominated by white pine with inclusions of birch and aspen.
Populations of game animals were not dense during Late Holocene times. Some
deer, moose, caribou, bear, and beaver were present. Brown trout lived in the
major streams below cataracts and large fish populations were present in Lake
Superior. Waterfowl were seasonally found along the shore. Wild rice was not
abundant.

Recorded archaeological remains
are particularly scarce in the Lake Superior Shore Region, although representatives
of early periods have been found along the Superior shore between the U.S.-Canadian
border and Thunder Bay, Ontario. While no fluted or Plano points are recorded
for the region in Minnesota, a number of Late Paleoindian sites, such as Cummings,
have been excavated in the Thunder Bay area. Dated to ca. 8500 B.P., Cummings
is a habitation and quarry site located on a glacial beach ridge. Early Prehistoric
period sites should be associated with Lake Duluth and Lake Minong beaches,
but these beaches are submerged in Minnesota and the sites may be buried or
destroyed. Early Prehistoric period and early Archaic sites between the border
and Thunder Bay generally occur on post-Minong beaches. Archaic remains in Minnesota
consist mostly of a few copper tools. Early Middle Prehistoric period Old Copper
sites could be associated with Houghton stage beaches. Archaic sites are generally
associated with major waterways.

Since Woodland ceramics are rare
and mounds are absent along the Superior shore from Duluth to Thunder Bay, it
is likely that Woodland use of the shoreline was limited. The few sherds that
have been found along the southern Canadian Lake Superior shore were on the
southwest side of peninsulas or small bays near the mouths of large rivers.
Woodland settlement was most likely along inland lakes and waterways. However,
one would expect to find warm weather base camps at good fishing spots at river
deltas along the Lake Superior shore. If they are present, Woodland sites in
the Lake Superior Shore Region could be concentrated in the estuary of the St.
Louis River at Duluth.

As in the Northern Bog and Border
Lakes Regions, the Assiniboine and Cree probably controlled much of this region
before being replaced by the Ojibwa in ca. 1700. French missionaries had contact
with this region in the mid-1600s and French trading posts were established
soon after, with Grand Portage as a major regional center. English and American
traders re-used many of the French posts and travel routes, and constructed
new posts, including one near Duluth.

In Phase 3, the Ecological Classification
System (ECS) sections and subsections became available for Minnesota (Figure
3.11). ECS is a method to identify, characterize and delineate units of
land with similar climatic, geological, physical and biological features that
are significant for natural resource management (Hanson and Hargrave 1996).
ECS replaced the archaeological regions (Section 3.4) as
the regionalization scheme in Phase 3. The reasons for this change are discussed
in Chapter 4. This section discusses the
development and characteristics of the Minnesota ECS.

ECS is a continent-wide, nested
hierarchical classification system, with six levels organized by decreasing
orders of scale (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources [MN DNR] Website, http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/ecs/index.html).
Mn/Model makes use of only the top three levels (Table 3.2).
Each ECS Province is divided into several Sections, each Section is divided
into several Subsections. Ecological units for each level are defined by the
dominant environmental factors that affect ecosystem processes and functions
at that particular scale.

An ad hoc interdisciplinary work
group representing the MN DNR, US Forest Service (USFS), and the University
of Minnesota collectively developed the Province, Section and Subsection maps,
beginning in 1991. It was completed to the subsection level in 1997. Delineation
of lower levels of the hierarchy continues. Development of the Minnesota system
is being coordinated with a similar effort on a national scale within the USFS
to assure consistency between agencies.

There are three ECS provinces (Figure 3.11) in Minnesota, named after the dominant
biomes. These are the tall-grass prairie (Prairie Parkland Province), the central
hardwoods (Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province), and the boreal forest (Laurentian
Mixed Forest Province). Variables used to distinguish between the provinces
are presented in Table 3.3. Additional variables used to
distinguish between Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province and Laurentian Mixed Forest
Province were winter temperatures and length of growing season. The Eastern
Broadleaf Forest Province has warmer winters and a longer growing season than
the Laurentian Mixed Forest Province.

Each of the Provinces is divided
into two to five Sections (Figure 3.11).
An example of the criteria for defining separate sections of the Laurentian
Mixed Forest Province is provided in Table 3.4. The 10
Minnesota Sections were subdivided into 24 Subsections.An example of
the criteria for defining separate Subsections of the Northern Minnesota Drift
& Lake Plains Section is provided in Table 3.5.

post glacial lake basin and
a small ground moraine of reworked lake deposits

92 to 115 days

60 to 67.5 cm

Detailed descriptions
of the ECS subsections are provided in Chapter
8, along with the descriptions of the Phase 3 models for the subsections.
Additional descriptions of the subsections can be found on the MN DNR Website, http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/ecs/index.html.

Against the backdrop of Minnesota’s
environmental and cultural diversity, Anfinson’s (1988, 1990) nine archaeological
regions (Figure 3.10) were considered a useful initial
focus for constructing models of archaeological site location in the state for
several reasons. First, they are hydrological regions based on the distribution
of different types of surface water, in particular the presence or absence of
lakes, lake morphology (bedrock or drift), and lake depth. Since water was a
focus of precontact and contact period settlement, various types of water may
be associated with different patterns of site location. Second, compared with
vegetation, the position of lakes and rivers has been stable since the Early
Holocene. Third, although the vegetation cover of the regions did shift radically
before about 3500 years ago, most archaeological sites in the project database
probably date to this more recent period. While special attention had to be
paid to the location of Early Archaic and Paleoindian components, it was thought
that predictive models based in part on the distribution of contact period vegetation
would perform well for recorded sites.

ECS subsections, adopted in Phase
3, had several additional advantages. First, the ECS is an integrated multi-factor
classification scheme, based on climate, geology, geomorphology, and historic
vegetation. As such, it was developed using a comprehensive interdisciplinary
approach. The subsections defined by ECS are mostly smaller and more environmentally
homogeneous than the archaeological regions and subregions. Moreover, ECS is
conducive to modeling at multiple scales. In the future, modeling can be extended
to lower levels of the hierarchy that are currently being developed. Moreover,
boundaries of the ECS units are based on natural features, not straight lines.
Because it is being developed nationwide, its use provides the potential for
consistency across states and between agencies. Finally, it was designed to
facilitate the understanding of relationships between single environmental components
within homogeneous environmental regions. This kind of analysis is similar in
many respects to attempting to understand relationships between archaeological
site locations and environmental factors within the same regions.

Irrespective of the regionalization
scheme used, many aspects of the natural environment of Minnesota introduced
difficulties into the modeling process. Among these are the large size of the
state (80,000 sq miles) and the diversity of its present and past environments.
At historic contact, vegetation ranged from coniferous forest in the northeast
to a prairie in the west. In the past, the state's climate and environment were
very dynamic. At first, the state was blanketed with a spruce forest, then by
prairie grasslands, and eventually by a mosaic of mixed hardwoods, deciduous
forest, and prairie. Changes in air mass, effective moisture, and amount of
annual sunlight accompanied these shifts. Patterns of river down-cutting changed
the ecology of river valleys, buried archaeological sites beneath many feet
of sediment, and shifted lake levels. Lake in-filling altered the attractiveness
of lakes as settlement areas, and the location of preferred habitation sites
shifted. During the historic period, dam construction, lake and wetland drainage,
mining, agriculture, and logging were among the many factors that severely altered
the state's natural environment.

This dynamic aspect of Minnesota's
natural environment through time meant that a decision had to be made about
the modeling aims of the project during the formulation of its research design.
In the predictive modeling literature in archaeology, two basic modeling aims
have been identified and their differing goals clearly explicated. This dichotomy
has been most explicitly discussed in Tomlin (1990:167-225), Warren (1990:90,
94-95), and Leusen (1996:181-185), but also see Kvamme (1992:22-23). These two
aims are often called the Cultural Resource Management (CRM) approach and the
Academic approach.

In the CRM approach, the governing
aim is to describe regularities in the locations and patterns of known archaeological
remains to predict where similar remains may be found. This approach produces
reports and maps that describe the archaeological potential of various regions,
so that an assessment of archaeological sensitivity can be made for planning
purposes. The result of this kind of modeling should be more efficient labor-intensive
surveying (Phase I survey) and, through better planning, a reduction in potential
impacts to archaeological sites. A primary aim is to make an accurate prediction
of archaeological sensitivity. As Leusen (1996:184) emphasizes, no "attempt
need be made to explain correlations between site locations and aspects of the
environment."

In the Academic approach, the governing
aim is to reconstruct and understand the motives and causes that underlie such
locations and patterns - in what archaeological remains can tell us about the
people who produced them. The path to understanding past settlement choice involves
explaining the variation found in the locations of known sites in terms of cultural
and environmental conditions, site formation processes, and site circumstances.

These two modeling aims lead to
different approaches to modeling past settlement distributions and to different
procedures for interpreting, testing, and enhancing the results. The CRM approach
is interested in location factors that have a significant statistical
correlation to some set of sites. The models produced by this approach are based
for the most part on the relationship of known surface sites with present environmental
variables. While this non-historical approach is well suited for modeling the
present distribution of sites, its models are usually unsuited to "making
sense" of past human behavior, since the present environment often bears
little relation to past environments (Brandt et al. 1992). The Academic approach
is interested in locational choice factors involved in the original process
of site selection. This approach is best suited for modeling the past distribution
of communities and, consequently, entails a huge effort in reconstructing past
cultural and environmental conditions and processes. Here the choice of independent
variables is explicitly based on understanding the settlement location factors
important to the prehistoric population studied - and it is an aim of the modeling
attempt to increase the profession’s understanding of those factors.

In cases where the environment was
stable for the period being modeled (e.g., Kvamme 1985:215), the distinction
between the two aims can be blurred. This is obviously not the case in Minnesota.
If the modeling aim of Mn/Model had been to increase our understanding of past
locational choice factors, then a major and necessary goal of the project would
have been the reconstruction of those factors. This would have involved a major
effort, for, as stressed above, in many cases more recent and often dramatic
changes in the landscape mask the reasons for the preferred settlement locations
of earlier periods. Since Mn/Model has cultural resource management objectives,
and because of the very large effort involved in establishing the project databases,
the decision was made to base it on a CRM approach. Nonetheless, geomorphologic
and paleoclimatic databases were incorporated into the GIS that have the potential,
as future enhancements, to provide a base for understanding past settlement
choice.

Another aspect of Minnesota's natural
environment that affected the modeling process is its areal diversity. Because
of this diversity, settlement locations differed among biomes, such as the prairie
and northern hardwood forests. It was considered unlikely that one master model
would effectively predict site locations across the entire state. This was the
underlying rationale for the construction of regional and sub-regional models.
Despite this diversity, the analysis in Chapter
8 points to underlying factors in site location such as elevated areas near
large lakes or perennial streams or rivers that transcend these regions.

The nature of Minnesota's precontact
cultures and of their archaeological record also provided potential problems
in the modeling process. For example, during the 12,000-year history of the
state's precontact Native Americans, populations were sparse compared with Midwestern
states to the south, such as Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio. This meant that not
all preferred locations were occupied in the past. These populations were organized,
too, in a variety of subsistence-settlement patterns, all of which included
some degree of seasonal mobility. As a result, preferred site locations were
diverse at any one time, and their nature shifted through time. In addition,
many of their activities, particularly before about 1500 B.C., were not the
kind that resulted in the formation of the types of sites usually recorded in
site databases, and a variety of natural processes, as mentioned above, buried
many sites. The Mn/Model archaeological database was based, then, on a potentially
difficult archaeological record for the precontact period. Because of these
difficulties, sites from the last 3000 years of record dominate the archaeological
database. Consequently, the models developed do a better job predicting these
sites than predicting the older, less numerous sites.

It is this environmental
and archaeological background that set the parameters for model development.
Chapters 4 through 8 outline the development and assessment of the predictive
models.

Bradbury, JP, and W.E. Dean
1993b Holocene Climate and Limnologic History of the North-Central
United States as Recorded in
the Varved Sediments of Elk Lake, Minnesota:
A Synthesis. In Elk Lake, Minnesota: Evidence
for Rapid Climate Change in the North-Central
United States, edited by J. P. Bradbury and
W. E. Dean, pp. 309-328. Special Paper 276, Geological
Society of America, US Geological
Survey, Denver.

Brandt, R. W., B. J. Groenewoudt,
and K. Kvamme
1992 An Experiment in Archaeological Site Location: Modeling in
the Netherlands Using GIS
Techniques. World Archaeology 24(2):268-282.

Bryson, R.A.
1996 Climatic Episodes (Holocene). In An Encyclopedia of North
American Prehistory, edited by
G. Gibbon. Garland Press, New York. In
press.

Bryson, R.A., DA Baerreis, and W.M.
Wendland
1970 The Character of Late-Glacial and Postglacial Climatic Changes.
In Pleistocene and Recent
Environments of the Central Great Plains,
edited by W. Dort, Jr. and J. K. Jones, Jr., pp. 53-
72. Special Publication 3, University of
Kansas Press, Lawrence.Caine, C.A.H.
1974 The Archaeology of the Snake River Region. In Aspects of
Upper Great Lakes
Anthropology, edited by E. Johnson,
pp. 55-63. Minnesota Prehistoric Archaeology Series, No.
11. Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul.

Clark, J.S.
1990 Fire and Climate Change During the Last 750 Years in Northwestern
Minnesota. Ecological
Monographs 60:135-169.
1993 Fire, Climate Change, and Forest Processes During the Past
2000 Years. In Elk Lake,
Minnesota: Evidence for Rapid Climate Change
in the North-Central United States, edited
by J. P. Bradbury and W. E. Dean, pp. 295-308.
Special Paper 276, Geological Society of
America, US Geological Survey, Denver.

Gibbon, G.E.
1979 The Mississippian Occupation of the Red Wing Area.
Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul.
1983 The Blue Earth Phase of Southern Minnesota. Journal of
the Iowa ArcheologicalSociety
30:1-84.
1991 The Middle Mississippian Presence in Minnesota. In Cahokia
and the Hinterlands: Middle
Mississippian Cultures of the Midwest,
edited by T.E. Emerson and R.B. Lewis, pp. 207-220.
University of Illinois Press, Urbana and
Chicago.
1993 The Middle Missouri Tradition in Minnesota: A Review. In Prehistory
and Human Ecology of
the Western Prairies and Northern Plains,
edited by J. Tiffany. Plains AnthropologistMemoir
27:169-187.
1994 Cultures of the Upper Mississippi River Valley and Adjacent
Prairies in Iowa and Minnesota. In Plains Indians, A.D. 500-1500: The Archaeological
Past of Historic Groups, edited by Karl
Schlesier, pp. 128-148. University of Oklahoma
Press, Norman.
1996a Modeling Paleoindian and Early Archaic Settlement in Minnesota.
Paper presented at the 54th
Annual Plains Anthropological Conference.
Iowa City, Iowa.
1996b Old Copper in Minnesota: A Review. In Great Lakes Archaeology:
Papers Presented to
Ronald Mason, edited by R. Birmingham.
Special issue of The Wisconsin Archeologist. In press.

Gibbon, G.E. (editor)
1990 The Woodland Tradition in the Western Great Lakes.
University of Minnesota Publications in
Anthropology, No. 4. Minneapolis.
1982 Oneota Studies. University of Minnesota Publications
in Anthropology, No. 1. Minneapolis.

Gibbon, G.E., and C.A.H. Caine.
1980 The Middle to Late Woodland Transition in Eastern Minnesota. Midcontinental Journal of
Archaeology 5(1):57-72.

Gibbon, G.E., and C.A. Dobbs
1991 The Mississippian Presence in the Red Wing Area. In New
Perspectives on Cahokia: Views
from the Periphery, edited by J.B.
Stoltman, pp. 281-305. Monographs in World Archaeology,
No. 2. Madison.

Graham, E.
1957 The Development of Peatlands. Quarterly Review of Biology 32:145-16

Grimm, E.C.
1981 An Ecological and Paleoecological Study of the Vegetation
in the Big WoodsRegion of Minnesota. Unpublished
Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
1983 Chronology and Dynamics of Vegetation Change in the Prairie-Woodland
Region of Southern
Minnesota, USA. New Phytologist 93:311-350.
1984 Fire and Other Factors Controlling the Big Woods Vegetation
of Minnesota in the Mid-
Nineteenth Century. Ecological Monographs 54:291-311.

Guthrie, R.D.
1980 Bison and Man in North America. Canadian Journal of Anthropology 6:581-596.

Hanson, D.H. and B.C. Hargrave
1996 Development of a Mulitilevel Ecological Classification System
for the State of Minnesota. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 39:75-84. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Netherlands.

Harington, C.R., and A.C. Ashworth.
1986 A Mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius) Tooth from Late Wisconsin
Deposits Near Embden,
North Dakota, and Comments on the Distribution
of Woolly Mammoths South of the Wisconsin
Ice Sheets. Canadian Journal of Earth
Sciences 23:909--918.

Lugenbeal, E.N.
1976 The Archaeology of the Smith Site: A Study of the Ceramics
and Culture History of
Minnesota Laurel and Blackduck. Unpublished
Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology,
University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Marschner, F.J.
1974 The Original Vegetation of Minnesota. Compiled from
U.S. General Land Office Survey
Notes. United States Department of Agriculture,
North Central Forest Experiment Station, St.
Paul.

Phillips, B.A.M.
1993 A Time-Space Model for the Distribution of Shoreline Archaeological
Sites in the Lake
Superior Basin. Geoarchaeology 8(2):87-107.

Phillips, J.L., and J.A. Brown (editors)
1983 Archaic Hunters and Gatherers in the American Midwest.
New World Archaeological
Record. Academic Press, New York.

Pielou, E.C.
1988 The World of Northern Evergreens. Cornell University
Press, Ithaca.
1991 After the Ice Age: The Return of Life to Glaciated North
America. University of Chicago
Press, Chicago. Pike, Z.
1965 The Expeditions of Zebulon Montgomery Pike to the Headwaters
of the Mississippi
Through Louisiana Territory, and in New
Spain, During the Years 1805-6-7 (Reprinted from
the original 1810, with commentary and
other additions by Elliott Coues). Ross and Haines,
Minneapolis.

Wilford, L.A.
1941 A Tentative Classification of the Prehistoric Cultures of
Minnesota. American Antiquity 6:231-
249.
1945 Three Village Sites of the Mississippi Pattern in Minnesota. American Antiquity 11:32-40.
1955 A Revised Classification of the Prehistoric Cultures of Minnesota. American Antiquity 21:130-
142.
1960 The First Minnesotans. In Minnesota Heritage, edited
by L.M. Brings, pp 40-79. T.S.
Denison, Minneapolis.

Wright, H.E., Jr.
1971 Retreat of the Laurentide Ice Sheet from 14,000 to 9,000 Years
Ago. Quaternary Research
1:316-330.
1972a Quaternary History of Minnesota. In Geology of Minnesota:
A Centennial Volume, edited
by P. K. Sims and G. B. Morey, pp. 515-545.
Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul.
1976a Ice Retreat and Revegetation of the Western Great Lakes Area.
In Quaternary Stratigraphy
of North America, edited by W. C. Malaney,
pp. 119-132. Dowden, Hutchison, and Ross,
Stroudsberg (PA).
1976b The Dynamic Nature of Holocene Vegetation. Quaternary
Research 6:581--596.