Islamic jihadist says slavery biggest honor for non-Muslim women

According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general, as does this passage. “Certainly will the believers have succeeded: They who are during their prayer humbly submissive, and they who turn away from ill speech, and they who are observant of zakah, and they who guard their private parts except from their wives or those their right hands possess, for indeed, they will not be blamed” (Qur’an 23:1-6).

The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:

Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Muslim 3371)

Notice that the controversy is not over whether the Muslims can rape the captives but only over coitus interruptus. The rape is taken for granted.

AN Australian Islamic State fighter who has been used in a propaganda video has claimed non-Muslim women are “used and abused” and should become slaves as it would be “the biggest honour for them”.

Abu Khalid, whom The Australian last year revealed was a former Melbourne man of Cambodian and Fijian ancestry and had ties to the al-Furqan Islamic centre, yesterday took to social media from the Middle East to make the claims.

Abu Khalid — who in June appeared in an Islamic State propaganda video but did not speak in it — made the comments after a non-Muslim girl asked him about his dancing abilities. “You should come to the Islamic state!” he said to the girl. “You can be a sabaya (slave), much more honour then (sic) being used and abused.”

He then told another man that non-Muslim women “know their men’s ain’t treating them well”. “Being a sabaya is the biggest honour for them And Allah knows best!”

The comments were made after Islamic State forced women and children of the Yazidi ­religious sect to be slaves who are often subjected to rape.

At least four Australian fighters have been identified as having Yazidi slaves, and horrific stories of their treatment — ­including sexual abuse — have emerged in recent weeks….

Most concerning this just shows how effective the Islamic brain washers are to be able to convince young women from free, first world democratic countries to up and leave to live a life of utter suppression in third world war zones. They are making those who once indoctrinated Russia’s youth with the virtues of communism or Germany Nazism look like rank amateurs

Allah’s supposed Messenger Muhammad was without HONOR.
He used and betrayed the three jinn pagans.
He used and betrayed the Christians of Ethiopia who saved his worthless ass.
He used and betrayed the Jews of Medina.
He used and betrayed all of his wives.

It all depends on the definition of “honor.”
Muhammad raped Safiya almost immediately after he had her husband tortured and beheaded, her father and many of her relatives killed.
Today, Safiya, a Jewish slave, is revered by Muslims all over the world!!!

Safiya, revered by Muslims around the world, according to the eminent Baladhuri’s 9th Century Book of Conquests: after the death of Muhammad, Saifya confessed that “of all men, I hated the prophet the most, for he killed my husband, my brother and my father” before marrying (raping) her.http://www.raymondibrahim.com/islam/muhammad-and-islams-sex-slaves/

Without adopting any particular banner or label (labels belong on jars), many of us women quietly spread the word in all of our groups (family gatherings, friends’ meetings, etc.) of PCMC’s distortions about Islam and the risk to the female sex class of Muslim codes and conduct. Just because it’s not making the news doesn’t mean it isn’t happening. We’re not really stupid or, in the west, uneducated despite what Boko Haram might want. We also don’t have to wear our points of view publicly on our sleeves. But we know, and we govern ourselves accordingly. I’m guessing, if we knew the back stories, that the western women joining with IS to become sex chattel of Muslim men have suffered child molestation or other emotional traumas and aren’t quite right mentally. Or they’ve been brainwashed by a global internet porn culture to think it’s hot, or some other societal Stockholm syndrome scenario. All very sad. IS and similar ilk is not the Middle Eastern Islam that Phyllis Chesler found so romantic (to her peril) as an adventurous young woman, and needed to escape, but an Islam of intense misogyny, hypocrisy, violence and corruption, the worst ideology put into practice by large numbers of men on the 21st century planet. Pray without ceasing, if you can, for the women’s and girls’ safety, protection and liberation.

Excuse my cynicism, but I see NOTHING from supposed ‘women’, supposed ‘feminists’ like prof Sunera Thobani of UBC, who are hot to rant about the country which accepted her, but I can find NOTHING about FGM from her.

Muslim women are one aspect, and God help them. But, they are talking about our women. If our beloved women are sex slaves then our men are ether dead or worse. The nerve of these savages. Just because something is written in an old book that claims to be the words of a dieti or a prophet, does mot make it so. To fight against Islamic fundamentalists is a fight in the name of humanity, and women are part of that fight. My thoughts and prayers especially go to the brave Kurdish women of the Pesh Merga.

The violent reactions to the Danish Muhammad cartoons of a few years ago showed that public ridicule of the absurdities and ugliness of Islamic doctrines really stirs up the inmates of the House of Mad and causes them to come out and reveal themselves in all their nastiness to the whole world. It is like poking a hornets nest with a stick. A problem with rational criticism of Islam, although essential, is that its impact is limited to those with some intelligence, interest and knowledge of the teachings. Furthermore it is too easy to just deny the facts. On the other hand ridicule, if presented cleverly, gets through to just about anyone, both those in the House of Sane who are only half awake and the inmates of the House of Mad.
I therefore think it is important for those of us in the House of Sane to devise ways of keeping the ridicule going. This will require some creative thinking but one obvious way could be to use the original cartoons and make up new captions relevant to current events. Distribution could be both online and by printed copies surreptitiously displayed or scattered in appropriate places.

The show of violent behaviour was not exactly a “reaction”, though that is how the instigators wanted it to be portrayed.
“It was a demonstration dishonestly orchestrated by imams. Forged cartoons were added that had never appeared in the Western press, and one imam toured the Muslim world to drum up support for a show of force. Whipped up by their imams in the mosques the Soldiers of Allah dutifully carried out their orders. All this was some four months after the publication, not spontaneous in the slightest. Violent riots were deliberately engendered around the world.”http://libertygb.org.uk/v1/index.php/home/root/news-libertygb/6562-and-take-their-wives-as-war-booty

But he is right in the sense that non-muslim men who are allowing these monkeys to more and more enter their territories have no balls and the manliness is correctly questioned. At least Western men should protest Islamization like PEGIDA does. Even this is a long and almost unachievable goal, resistance is what a Western man should do these days !! Organize your own PEGIDA marches soon !!!

to the men in the USA.if you. care any thing about your wife, daughters, sisters, aunts, mothers, grandmothers, need to wake up to what is happening to the women in your lives,. and start doing something about it. become a man and do the job GOD wanted you to do. protect and serve.

The resistance is waking up. I´m pretty sure that what started in Dresden, Germany, is the beginning of a new cultural awareness in Europe and all over the West. People will realize who their enemies are: They sit in the parliaments and the media industry and they have run out of buzz words. The islamophile lobby is very very superficial. They will be wiped away, trust me and RESIST !!

The jihadists in making that above absurd statement have just exposed just how very ignorant they really are. They are full of it. Furthermore, according to the Bible, God detests such a cruel and heartless practice as the above article describes. In fact the God of the Bible so must hates such awful wickedness that he had declared the death penalty for those who engage in that heinous action. For In Exodus 21:16. It reads “Whoever steals someone to sell as a slave or to keep them for their own slave must be killed.” [E.R.V.]

The reason for adopting Islam for some especially males is that the benefit of having a women who’s not only docile, honest to her master in terms of relationship as she will be full of fear due to ostracisation inherently imposed by religion, but also several other things like being just a serving baby-making machine or sex-slave to her master.
Islam also gives the benefit to males that they can have four wives for sexual gratification at a time thus giving legitimacy to illicit relations of menfolk if any. Also is to be noted that in several countries menfolk are kinda absolved of crimes like committing rape, incest (in the form of having sex with closer relative) and adultery by making the rules bend in favor of men. Women generally are denied the right to protest and have a say in majority of Islamic countries, they can’t even prove the crime of rape as the Islamic laws are too complex and hard to get by.
Since, all these things makes menfolk too secure in terms of gratification of whatever… hence Jihadists will always like to boast about its worthiness in glowing terms.

I cannot understand why liberal women have not shaken the earth over the islamic code for women. The ones I know raise pure hell over leaving the toilet seat up!!! Then there’s the topless feminists shoving crosses up their butts in front of the Vatican but slavery? Where’s the slightest notice? How do the Pelosi types justify it?

Of course they need to promise a 72 year old virgin to the mozzie youth – how else are the old men supposed to find their four wives? Seriously, after raping and stoning the prettiest ones, the ugly cousins are all that is left for a breeding goat.

The sexual frustration of the young men is used by immamis to manipulate them into fighting for a woman of the right hand, a way to force the infidel who has created something worthwhile to surrender to sad sack of s*it to feel better about their wiping their tiny docks in the sand.

Abu Khalid — who in June appeared in an Islamic State propaganda video but did not speak in it — made the comments after a non-Muslim girl asked him about his dancing abilities. “You should come to the Islamic state!” he said to the girl. “You can be a sabaya (slave), much more honour then (sic) being used and abused.”

He then told another man that non-Muslim women “know their men’s ain’t treating them well”. “Being a sabaya is the biggest honour for them And Allah knows best!”
…………………………………….

Of course, this pious Muslim scum isn’t really concerned that some Western men are “using and abusing” women, nor that Western women’s “men’s (sic) ain’t treating them well”—he means that any desirable Western woman having a relationship with an Infidel man is a ‘waste’ in that she should be raped by Muslims, instead.

Muslim men see women as objects—and don’t believe that Infidels should have use of such objects.

I can see Rachael inviting a circle of Muslimas (a slyly diverse collection, some wearing modest hijabs, others just Jackie Onassis scarves, others looking oh-so Westernized without head covering at all; and of course the obligatory racial spectrum of black, white, brown, yellow) onto her show to “share” with the audience some home cooking Islamic-style. In one part of the segment, she might even don a scarf herself, as a show of sympathetic “respect”.

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Robert Spencer’s Free Speech Book

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.