Californians Want and Deserve Stronger Privacy Laws

Californians Want and Deserve Stronger Privacy Laws

California made strides to protect privacy last year with the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). This year, we want to make sure that the state has tools necessary to make sure it can enforce that law, and that everyone will be able to stand up for their own privacy without fear of discrimination.

That is why we are supporting both A.B. 1760 and S.B. 561: two essential bills to provide Californians with the privacy protection they want and deserve. We stand fully behind these bills and their authors, Assemblymember Buffy Wicks and Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson.

Wicks’ bill, A.B. 1760, would give California consumers the knowledge and protection to defend their privacy rights. It makes sure that they can learn which companies have received their personal information through a sale or other form of sharing. The bill also requires that all companies that share data, as well as those that sell it, get the consumer’s opt-in consent to do so.

This law helps people become aware of the myriad ways personal information is shared in the modern digital world. And it ensures that companies cannot punish people for exercising their right to privacy, by imposing a higher price or inferior service. No one should ever be punished for protecting their privacy, and privacy should not be a premium feature for those who can afford it.

We thank Assemblymember Wicks for her leadership in continuing to defend her bill, and standing up for Californians and their privacy, even in the face of heavy pushback from the technology industry. Ahead of A.B. 1760’s April 23 hearing before the Privacy Committee, however, the bill has had to undergo amendments. This included removing the private right of action—a right that 94 percent of Californians agree they should have.

That’s where S.B. 561 steps in. Sen. Jackson’s bill provides tools for the Attorney General’s Office to enforce the CCPA and hold companies accountable for their actions, and grants every person the right to take companies to court for violating their privacy rights. As EFF has said many times, the best way to hold companies accountable is to empower ordinary consumers to bring their own lawsuits against the companies that violate their privacy rights.

Sen. Jackson showed remarkable leadership by standing firm against critics to pass her bill out of a key committee, underscoring her commitment to giving the Attorney General and the people of California these crucial tools.

We support these complementary bills to give Californians the rights and power needed to stand up for their own privacy. Tell your lawmakers that it’s time for them to stand up for your privacy, too.

Related Updates

Last week, Facebook started sending a small portion of its users a new notification about its face surveillance program, which concludes with two important buttons: “keep off” and “turn on.” This is a step in the right direction: for these users, the default will be no face surveillance...

The California Senate listened to the many voices expressing concern about the use of face surveillance on cameras worn or carried by police officers, and has passed an important bill that will, for three years, prohibit police from turning a tool intended to foster police accountability into one that furthers...

EFF continues our fight to have the U.S. courts protect you from mass government surveillance. Today in our landmark Jewel v. NSA case, we filed our opening brief in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, asserting that the courts don’t have to turn a blind eye to the...

If you open Facebook’s mobile app today, it will likely suggest that you try the company’s new Dating service, which just launched in the U.S. after a rollout in 19 other countries last year. But with the company’s track record of mishandling user data, and its business model of monetizing...

Yesterday Facebook announced it was changing its settings for face recognition, which it has used since 2010 to match known faces in user profile pictures and other photos to unknown faces in newly uploaded photos. This leads to two questions: What exactly has Facebook changed? How many Facebook users...

Hundreds of thousands of Californians last year demanded that big technology companies respect their privacy rights, and supported a movement that led to the California Consumer Privacy Act. The law will go into effect on January 1, 2020. Big technology companies fought hard against the CCPA and have been leaning...

Media outlets reported this week that an international student at Harvard University was deported back to Lebanon after border agents in Boston searched his electronic devices and confronted him about his friends’ social media posts. These allegations raise serious concerns about whether the government is following its own policies regarding...

More than 400 police departments across the country have partnered with Ring, tech giant Amazon’s “smart” doorbell program, to create a troubling new video surveillance system. Ring films and records any interaction or movement happening at the user’s front door, and alerts users’ phones. These partnerships expand the web...

EFF is teaming up with the Mozilla Foundation to tell Venmo to clean up its privacy act. In a public letter sent to President/CEO Dan Schulman and COO Bill Ready today, we are telling Venmo to make transactions private by default and let users hide their friend lists. Both ...

San Francisco – The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and Mozilla have teamed up in an open letter to Venmo, telling the popular payment app to clean up its privacy settings, which leaves sensitive financial data exposed to the public. Venmo is marketed as a way for friends to send...