The name of Jesus is not welcome in the Johnson Space Center newsletter, according to a complaint filed on behalf of a group of Christians who work for NASA. The JSC Praise & Worship Club was directed by NASA attorneys to refrain from using the name ‘Jesus’ in club announcements that appeared in a Space Center newsletter.

FOX News It was shocking to all of us and very frustrating,” NASA engineer Sophia Smith told me. “NASA has a long history of respecting religious speech. Why wouldn’t they allow us to put the name Jesus in the announcement about our club?”

Liberty Institute, one of the nation’s largest religious liberty law firms, threatened to file a federal lawsuit unless NASA apologizes and stops censoring the name ‘Jesus’.

The JSC Today newsletter is distributed electronically and includes a number of Space Center events – from salsa dancing lessons to soccer camp. NASA issued a statement late Monday – that did not refute Liberty Institute’s charge.

“NASA does not prohibit the use of any specific religious names in employee newsletters or other internal communications. The agency allows a host of employee-led civic, professional, religious and other organizations to meet on NASA property on employee’s own time.

Consistent with federal law, NASA attempts to balance employee’s rights to freely exercise religious beliefs with its obligation to ensure there is no government endorsement of religion. We believe in and encourage open and diverse dialogue among our employees and across the agency.”

Under Obama, a Saudi prince received training at NASA

Since 2001, employees had gathered during their lunch hour to pray and sing and read the Bible. There had been no censorship issues until last year.

Liberty Institute attorney Jeremy Dys told me the club had placed an announcement in the Space Center’s newsletter – announcing the theme of their meeting, “Jesus is our life.” “Soon after that, the legal department called the organizers and told them they could not use the name Jesus in their announcements,” Dys told me. “They said, no Jesus.”

Nearly 50 Libyan Muslims have trained as astronauts at the U.S. National Space & Rocket Center’s Space Camp since 2009,

The club’s leadership was told that “NASA would be censoring all future club announcements that featured the name, ‘Jesus’,” Liberty Institute alleged in its complaint letter.

NASA’s legal department explained that including the name ‘Jesus’ within the club’s announcement made that announcement “sectarian” or “denominational.” They also alleged such announcements would cause NASA to violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

“NASA Administrator Charles Bolden created a firestorm after telling Al Jazeera in June 2010 that President Obama told him before he took the job that he wanted him to do three things:

1 – Inspire children to learn math and science2 – Expand international relationships and3 – ‘Perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science … and math and engineering.’ (CRAP!)

Sorry CAIR, your Muslim brother beheader won’t be able to use the “mental problems” defense that’s become the favorite excuse for Muslim violence. And don’t try to tell us this had “nothing to do with Islam.”

Newson6 (h/t Timothy C) Alton Nolen also known as Jahkeem Yisrael, the Mohammedan accused of beheading his co-worker and attempting to behead another worker at Vaughan Foods in Moore, has been deemed competent to stand trial.

The competency trial began on Monday for Alton Nolen, who is accused of beheading 54-year-old Colleen Hufford. Nolen had been suspended from his job at Vaughan Foods processing plant where they worked when the attack occurred on Sept. 25, 2014.

During the trial, Nolen’s defense team contends their client is not competent to stand trial because he has a learning disability.

However, on Wednesday, District Judge Lori Walkley deemed Nolen competent to stand trial, stating, “because there is no other evidence of a defect, psychological or otherwise, that would prevent Defendant from assisting in his defense, there is no dispute that he is able to appreciate the nature of the charges made against him. This court finds that Defendant is competent to undergo further criminal proceedings in this matter.”

The judge ordered to resume proceedings in this case, which have been stayed pending the determination of Nolen’s competency.