nmm 22 4500ICPSR03688MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03688MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2001
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3688NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM)
Program is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use
in the population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were
collected in 2001 at four separate times (quarterly) during the year
in 33 metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program
adopted a new instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male
(Part 1) and female (Part 2) arrestees. Data from arrestees in
juvenile detention facilities (Part 3) continued to use the juvenile
instrument from previous years, extending back through the DRUG USE
FORECASTING series (ICPSR 9477). The ADAM program in 2001 also
continued the use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in
adult facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male
adult sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling
stratification of the data. For the adult files, variables fell into
one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2)
ADAM facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the
case, including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of
admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs,
(5) data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence (6) drug
acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs,
(7) urine test results, and (8) weights. The juvenile file contains
demographic variables and arrestee's self-reported past and continued
use of 15 drugs, as well as other drug-related behaviors.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03688.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. National Institute of JusticeInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3688Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03688.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03815MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03815MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2002
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3815NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program
is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the
population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in
2002 at four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 36
metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new
instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and
female (Part 2) arrestees. Data from arrestees in juvenile detention
facilities (Part 3) continued to use the juvenile instrument from
previous years, extending back through the DRUG USE FORECASTING series
(ICPSR 9477). The ADAM program in 2002 also continued the use of
probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult facilities, which
was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult sample includes
weights, generated through post-sampling stratification of the data. For
the adult files, variables fell into one of eight categories: (1)
demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM facesheet (records-based)
data, (3) data on disposition of the case, including accession to a
verbal consent script, (4) calendar of admissions to substance abuse and
mental health treatment programs, (5) data on alcohol and drug use,
abuse, and dependence, (6) drug acquisition data covering the five most
commonly used illicit drugs, (7) urine test results, and (8) weights.
The juvenile file contains demographic variables and arrestee's
self-reported past and continued use of 15 drugs, as well as other
drug-related behaviors.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03815.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeUnited States Department of Justice. National Institute of JusticeInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3815Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03815.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04020MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04020MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2003
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR4020NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program
is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the
population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in
2003 up to four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 39
metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new
instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and
female (Part 2) arrestees. The ADAM program in 2003 also continued the
use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult
facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult
sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling stratification
of the data. For the adult male and female files, variables fell into
one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM
facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the case,
including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of
admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs, (5)
data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence, (6) drug
acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs, (7)
urine test results, and (8) for males, weights.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04020.v1
demographic characteristicsicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Justice. National Institute of JusticeInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4020Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04020.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21187MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21187MiAaIMiAaI
Exploring the Drugs-Crime Connection Within the Electronic Dance Music and Hip Hop Nightclub Scenes in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2005-2006
[electronic resource]
Tammy Anderson
,
Philip R. Kavanaugh
,
Ronet Bachman
,
Lana D. Harrison
2013-01-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR21187NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
To explore the relationship between alcohol, drugs, and crime in the electronic dance music and hip hop nightclub scenes of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, researchers utilized a multi-faceted ethnographic approach featuring in-depth interviews with 51 respondents (Dataset 1, Initial Interview Qualitative Data) and two Web-based follow-up surveys with respondents (Dataset 2, Follow-Up Surveys Quantitative Data). Recruitment of respondents began in April of 2005 and was conducted in two ways. Slightly more than half of the respondents (n = 30) were recruited with the help of staff from two small, independent record stores. The remaining 21 respondents were recruited at electronic dance music or hip hop nightclub events. Dataset 1 includes structured and open-ended questions about the respondent's background, living situation and lifestyle, involvement and commitment to the electronic dance music and hip hop scenes, nightclub culture and interaction therein, and experiences with drugs, criminal activity, and victimization. Dataset 2 includes descriptive information on how many club events were attended, which ones, and the activities (including drug use and crime/victimization experiences) taking place therein. Dataset 3 (Demographic Quantitative Data) includes coded demographic information from the Dataset 1 interviews.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21187.v1
alcohol abuseicpsrassaulticpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug trafficicpsrdrug useicpsrharassmenticpsrproperty crimesicpsrsexual assaulticpsrsexual harassmenticpsrsubstance abuseicpsrvandalismicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramAnderson, TammyKavanaugh, Philip R.Bachman, RonetHarrison, Lana D.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21187Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21187.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07865MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07865MiAaIMiAaI
National Supported Work Evaluation Study, 1975-1979
[electronic resource]Public Use Files
Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation
2009-02-02Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7865NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study is an evaluation of the National Supported Work
Demonstration project, a transitional, subsidized work experience
program for four target groups of people with longstanding employment
problems: ex-offenders, former drug addicts, women who were long-term
recipients of welfare benefits, and school dropouts, many with
criminal records. The program provided up to 12-18 months of
employment to about 10,000 individuals at 15 locations across the
country for four years. In ten of these sites -- Atlanta, Chicago,
Hartford, Jersey City, Newark, New York, Philadelphia, Oakland, San
Francisco, and Wisconsin, 6,600 eligible applicants were randomly
assigned either to experimental groups (offered a job in supported
work) or to control groups, and an evaluation was conducted on the
effects of the Supported Work Program. At the time of enrollment,
each respondent was given a retrospective baseline interview,
generally covering the previous two years, followed by up to four
follow-up interviews scheduled at nine-month intervals. Two public use
files were originally distributed for this data collection: Supported Work
Employment and Earnings File, and Supported Work Deviant
Behavior File. Each file contained data for up to five
interviews, a cross-document dataset and an Aid to
Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) recipients follow-up. The Employment and Earnings File contains data from all interview modules except the drug and crime sections, and the Deviant Behavior File contains all variables on the Employment and Earnings File as well as additional information on drugs and crime. Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) recipients were further asked about children in school and welfare participation, while all non-AFDC
respondents were questioned about any extralegal activities. Demographic items specify age, sex, race, marital status, education, number of children, employment history, job search, job training, mobility, household income, welfare assistance, housing, military discharge status, and drug use. Each respondent has up to six logical, fixed-length records, with each record corresponding to a completed interview (up to five) and one additional short "cross-document" record. A User's Guide describing the collection
and its components is available and should be read before the collection
or any part of it is ordered.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07865.v2
social attitudesicpsrcriminal justice systemicpsrdevianceicpsrdrug law offensesicpsreconomic behavioricpsremploymenticpsrgovernment programsicpsrjob historyicpsrlabor forceicpsroccupationsicpsrpublic assistance programsicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial indicatorsicpsrunemploymenticpsrwork environmenticpsrworkersicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United StatesNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeManpower Demonstration Research CorporationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7865Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07865.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32282MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32282MiAaIMiAaI
Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA]
[electronic resource]Calendar Data, 2000-2010 [Restricted]
Edward P. Mulvey
2014-11-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR32282NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Calendar data files are comprised of 47 total parts spread across 13 distinct topical domains.
Academic Achievement
Antisocial Activity
Community-Based Services
Contact With the Justice System
Court Monitoring
Gainful Activity
Head Injury
Living Situation
Making and Spending Money
Medication
Out of Community Placement
Romance
School
Each topical domain contains multiple reference periods for looking at the topic across the entire data collection period of the study.
Users who request these restricted data should first review the documentation available from NAHDAP (user guide and frequency codebooks) and from the Pathways Website (domain content codebooks). This review will help determine which specific datasets will be needed for your project. The "Research Description" in ICPSR's Data Access Request System (IDARS) must include a specific explanation of why you need each topic domain selected on the "Data Selection" page in IDARS. Most projects should only require one reference period per topic domain being requested. Data requests for all reference periods within a given domain will not be approved without a satisfactory explanation of why all of the reference periods are required for your project. Since the Calendar data collection is very extensive and Restricted Data Use Agreements are only for 2 years, data requests are not expected to need the entire Calendar data collection.
The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654) and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700).
Respondents were enrolled and baseline interviews conducted from November 2000 to January 2003. Follow-up interviews were then scheduled with the respondents at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60, 72 and 84 months past their baseline interview.
The enrolled youth were at least 14 years old and under 18 years old at the time of their committing offense and were found guilty of a serious offense (predominantly felonies, with a few exceptions for some misdemeanor property offenses, sexual assault, or weapons offenses).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32282.v2
academic achievementicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsremploymenticpsrfamily lifeicpsrfriendshipsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrincomeicpsrinjuriesicpsrinterpersonal relationsicpsrjuvenile crimeicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrmedicationsicpsrpersonal adjustmenticpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrpsychosocial assessmenticpsrreligionicpsrservice providersicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsubstance abuseicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyHMCA III. Substance Abuse and HealthMulvey, Edward P.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32282Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32282.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32881MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32881MiAaIMiAaI
Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA]
[electronic resource]Collateral Measures, 2000-2004
Edward P. Mulvey
2013-01-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR32881NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654) and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700) from 2000 through 2010.
This study looks at interviews conducted with the collateral informants who participated in the study. The collateral informants were nominated by the main study participant and represented individuals who "knew the study participant well". At the interview baseline the collateral informant was usually a biological parent. During the three follow-up interviews the majority of collaterals were a friend. Collateral informants could also be a sibling, significant other, or relative. Collaterals were asked questions in regards to the main study participant's life, allowing for comparison between responses provided by two sources. A baseline interview was conducted with the collateral after the baseline interview took place with the main participant. Additional waves of follow-up with collaterals took place at 12, 24, and 36 months. A collateral report is not present for all of the main study participant interviews across waves (see response rate below).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32881.v1
interpersonal relationsicpsrjuvenile crimeicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrpersonal adjustmenticpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrpsychosocial assessmenticpsrreligionicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsubstance abuseicpsracademic achievementicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrfamily lifeicpsrfriendshipsicpsrgangsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrincomeicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemHMCA III. Substance Abuse and HealthNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyMulvey, Edward P.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32881Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32881.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34605MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34605MiAaIMiAaI
Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA]
[electronic resource]Official Arrest Records, 2000-2010 [Restricted]
Edward P. Mulvey
2014-07-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34605NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654), and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700).
The official arrests records of all 1,354 youth were obtained from multiple sources. For arrest/petitions under the age of 18, this information is based on petitions appearing in the juvenile and adult court records in each site. In Philadelphia, this information was gathered based on a hand review of juvenile and adult court documents; in Phoenix, the information is based on reports from two computerized court tracking systems (JOLTS--Juvenile On-Line Tracking System for juvenile court information, ICIS--Maricopa County Superior Court database for adult court information). For arrests/petitions over 18, FBI arrest records are the source of information. There is no self-reported information contained in this set of data.
Information from these different data sources is consolidated into the following categories:
Information regarding petitions with a date that falls prior to the baseline interview date ("prior petitions").
Information regarding the study index petition (also called the "initial referring petition"; this is the adjudication that prompted study enrollment). Information regarding the study index petition can be found by accessing the "type" variable associated with the prior petitions (specific variable name: Official Record Prior PetitionXX: Petition type). Depending on the investigator's needs, this petition can remain combined with the "priors" or be used as a stand-alone petition.
Information regarding arrests and court petitions with a date which falls after the baseline interview date in the Pathways study ("rearrests").
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34605.v2
arrest recordsicpsrfelony offensesicpsrjuvenile crimeicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrmisdemeanor offensesicpsrproperty crimesicpsrsex offensesicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrweapons offensesicpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramHMCA III. Substance Abuse and HealthICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemMulvey, Edward P.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34605Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34605.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29961MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29961MiAaIMiAaI
Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA]
[electronic resource]Subject Measures, 2000-2010
Edward P. Mulvey
2013-01-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR29961NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654) and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700).
Respondents were enrolled and baseline interviews conducted from November 2000 to January 2003. Follow-up interviews were then scheduled with the respondents at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60, 72 and 84 months past their baseline interview.
The enrolled youth were at least 14 years old and under 18 years old at the time of their committing offense and were found guilty of a serious offense (predominantly felonies, with a few exceptions for some misdemeanor property offenses, sexual assault, or weapons offenses).
The baseline interview was conducted within 75 days of the youth's adjudication hearing. For youths in the adult system, the baseline interview was conducted within 90 days of either (a) the decertification hearing in Philadelphia, a hearing at which it is determined if the case will remain in adult court or if it will be sent back to juvenile court; or (b) the adult arraignment hearing in Phoenix, the point in the Arizona adult system at which charges have been formally presented.
The aims of the investigation were to identify initial patterns of how serious adolescent offenders stop antisocial activity, to describe the role of social context and developmental changes in promoting these positive changes, and to compare the effects of sanctions and interventions in promoting these changes. The larger goals of the Pathways to Desistance study were to improve decision-making by court and social service personnel and to clarify policy debates about alternatives for serious adolescent offenders. The study relied primarily on self-report information from study participants.
Each wave of data collection covered six domains: (1) background characteristics (e.g., demographics, academic achievement, psychiatric diagnoses, offense history, neurological functioning, psychopathy, personality), (2) indicators of individual functioning (e.g., work and school status and performance, substance abuse, mental disorder, antisocial behavior), (3) psychosocial development and attitudes (e.g., impulse control, susceptibility to peer influence, perceptions of opportunity, perceptions of procedural justice, moral disengagement), (4) family context (e.g., household composition, quality of family relationships), (5) personal relationships (e.g., quality of romantic relationships and friendships, peer delinquency, contacts with caring adults), and (6) community context (e.g., neighborhood conditions, personal capital, and community involvement). Information about the measures used to capture this information can be found on the Pathways to Desistance website.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29961.v2
family lifeicpsrfriendshipsicpsrgangsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrincomeicpsrinterpersonal relationsicpsrjuvenile crimeicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrpersonal adjustmenticpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrpsychosocial assessmenticpsrreligionicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsubstance abuseicpsracademic achievementicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemHMCA III. Substance Abuse and HealthNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyMulvey, Edward P.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29961Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29961.v2