Animals and social work: An emerging field of practice for Aotearoa New Zealand

Peter Walker, Jenny Aimers, Claire Perry

Abstract

Social work is traditionally human-centered in practice, even though for many the bond between humans and animals is the most fundamental of daily-lived experiences. The intent of this paper is to reflect on the predominant humanistic basis of social work and to consider the growing evidence for developing a wider perspective to incorporate the human-animal connection into social work practice.

Joanne Emmens (2007:9) observes that the human-animal bond is considered by some as ‘…too mainstream (in the sense of being lightweight, cliché or sentimental), or as not mainstream enough…as substantial material worthy of study.’

In this article we argue that the human-animal bond is neither sentimental nor fringe and that our attitudes toward this relationship is based on a construction of western thought. To support this we offer a review of literature that provides evidence of good practice that can move social work beyond a purely humanistic approach to a more holistic view resulting in a more comprehensive toolkit for practice.

We explore the literature and practice surrounding the place of animals in social work, both in New Zealand and internationally. In addition, we identify some of the ways the human-animal bond is currently utilised in rehabilitation, therapy, as animal assistants and as an indicator of domestic violence within New Zealand. We argue that this area of research and practice is highly relevant for social work as evidence-based practice. The paper con- cludes by offering some suggestions for discussion within the social work profession, and considerations for social work educators, researchers and theorists.

Evans, N. & Gray, C. (2012). The practice and ethics of animal-assisted therapy with children and young people: Is it enough that we don’t eat our co-workers? British Journal of Social Work, 42, 600-617.

Hanrahan, C. (2011). Challenging anthropocentrism in social work though ethics and spirituality: Lessons from studies in human animal bonds. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 30(3), 272-293.

The Humane Society of the United States. (2008). First strike: The violence connection. The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS).

Potts, A., Armstrong, P. & Brown, D. (2013). A New Zealand book of beasts – animals in our culture, history and everyday life. Auckland University Press, Auckland.

Randou, M. (2011). What every clinician should know about the link between pet abuse and family violence. Continu- ing Education Programme, American Psychological Association. http://www.apa.org/education/ce/pet-abuse-family-violence.pdf

Roguski, M. (2012). Pets as pawns: The co-existence of animal cruelty and family violence. Report prepared for Royal New Zealand Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and The National Collective of Independent Women’s Refuges. March 21, 2012.

University of Tennessee. (2014) Veterinary social work. http://www.vetsocialwork.utk.edu/. Accessed July 2014.

Veterinary Council of New Zealand. (2013). Guidance for veterinarians dealing with cases of suspected or actual animal abuse and family violence. Veterinary Council of NZ available online, http://www.vetcouncil.org.nz/documentation/Other/VCNZGuidance_Veterinarians_AnimalAbuse_and_FamilyViolence.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2014.

Walsh, F. (2009). Human–animal bonds II: The role of pets in family systems and family therapy. Family Process, 48, 481–99.

Williams, V., Dale, A., Clarke, N. & Garrett, N. (2008). Animal abuse and family violence: Survey on the recognition of animal abuse by veterinarians in New Zealand and their understanding of the correlation between animal abuse and human violence. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 56, 1.