From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Contents

That is the last straw!

I fucking put my comment at the TOP OF THE PAGE so all those people with TS can see it when they look at this thing. There is even a template at the TOP OF THIS ARTICLE on how it is designed to be offensive. I'll do some shout-outs to people who try to battle that tight-ass 17-year-old.

Okay, we'll, I couldn't find it now, but someone said on Uncyclopedia, EVERYTHING is a laughing matter. Plus there was also a guy who said that on Uncyclopedia, there are articles about 9/11 and the Holocaust and some pretty touching stuff. So that means stop getting mad at the first part too and talking about the letter that it's mocking (what letter? I don't even know what the heck you're talking about). Adrian hi self even made a really good point. "It's nothing more from a head nod to a knee tick". Which I'll add onto saying that you Tourrettes don't suffer that much and taking the jokes to seriously makes it a lot harder than it needs to be, because if I were a Tourrette, I would probably find this article hilarious. If you want facts, go on Wikipedia. If you're sure you'll be offended, don't read the freaking article anyway.

Oyea...

Another thing I wanted to say is that even Wikipedia has its naughty side! Forexample, search "Wikipedia:Don't Stuff Beans Up Your Nose!" or translate "turd" into Russian, search it on Russian Wikipedia, and at the bottom of the disambiguation page it'll say "Shit happens."

Moved from the article

~~ Moved to discussion, where it belongs: —The preceding unsigned comment was added by140.211.82.4 (talk • contribs) 11:20, 30 September 1995; a long-ass time ago. A time in which things were so horribly low-tech (no high-speed internetz!), that people had to eat their own urine-laced shit and recycle because industry couldn't keep up with the standard middle class working man and feed him appropriately without having a gajillion dudes starving to death. Which explains why the human population on earth is only 7 billion to this date. (UTC).

A BLASPHEMOUSINGLY Polite Note to the Author: I am 17 years old and have Tourette Syndrome. I do not find your GAYASS article funny or amusing in any way, and I would like it removed or changed as soon as possible.

Let me tell you about Tourette Syndrome:

Less than 20% of Tourrettes sufferers swear. You can blame television for always focusing on the bad side of a terrible thing.

The main symptom of Tourettes are involuntary muscle spasms, or "DIRTY SANCHEZ" which can range from head nods, to a small knee jerk.

Tourettes is no laughing matter, it causes children to be bullied at school for something they cannot control, and it has even caused teenage sufferers to become manically depressed and commit INCEST.

There is no cure, and the CRACK that are available to "calm" (because the calm is all that matters, the calm, because normal people would love to ignore you. Livin' a lie, lolololololololololol) the tics often have adverse side efects. In fact, I once took a drug called "hanna montana's COCKSUCKER spare peroxide penedryl PENIS petro-gas SEXdolls" which caused my entire body to go numb and basically made it worse than it is without the METH (it's not a drug, ololol, but pharmaceutical companies still made A FUCKING SHITLOAD OF PAPER, HOMiE, lolololz).

I am an active member of a tourette syndrome association and I am making steps towards eradicating the public view of Tourettes as a "FAPPing" disorder, because it is much much more. Swearing is actually an excellent form of emotional MASTURBATing as it were, and is teaching tolerance and social tenacity among the youth of our society after all!

I am sorry for "being a UNCYCLOPEDIAN terrorist-PUSSY-douche, and FAPPING TO" your entry on uncyclopedia, but it is stuff like this that really annoys THE SHIT OUT OF me. i am working towards a better future for all tourettes suffers, and you can do the same by FUCKing this article, and tossing out some safety-dance rhetoric to confuse people thoroughly. Remember, everything here is meant to be funny (as in patronizing people and throwing unfunny sitcom style GAY-ASS shit all over the place, lolol, because that's all people ever wanted when they get home from a hard day at work to browse the internet. They wanna take away anonymization of COCKSUCKER usernames. They want internetz to be regulated by one immense super-mega-corporation, afterall. And so-called 'honest, lawful parental types' just wish to make it happen for a better future. I also support wire-tapping, because what's the point of freedom and being human AND RAPE if you can't feel secure and patronized and safe AND HORNY? Livin' a lie is so much more awesome, believe me.), and making fun of a horrible disorder is not funny at all. After all, comedy is the truth. But truth aint right, so it's like a paradox or somethin'. I don't know, don't look at me man, I'm just sittin' here jackin' OFF, checking out uncyclopedia and expecting to encounter others who are often referred to as FUCKIN DUMBASSES who'll supposedly agree with me on this issue.

Thank you for your time.
Adrian
—The preceding unsigned comment was added byDrPoodle (talk • contribs) 15:45, 25 September 3859; A TIME IN WHICH NOBODY GIVES A SHIT (UTC).

- Thats right, just remove my plea because you are a sick person who finds it funny to make fun of horrible disorders. You are a SICK person. If you had Tourettes and someone made fun of it you would not laugh. Do people make jokes about cancer? No. Actually wait, they did in that one episode of south park with the 'head cancer' thing. But I mean, that's not the point I'm trying to get at here, so anyway, don't make fun of disorders, cuz there's people out there, y'know, who suffer from disorders every day, y'know y'know y'know NUTHIN, Y'KNOW NUTHIN, DAMN YOU JOHN MCCAIN I HATE YOU (BECAUSE YOU'RE JUST TOO AWESOME TO LOVE) AND I SUPPORT COLBERT'S VIEWS ON THIS, YOU MAKE US ALL LIVIN' A LIE, and that is not funny. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byDrPoodle (talk • contribs) 10:43, 30 September 2005 (UTC).

Since you did not change the article from an insult to humour, I put it up for deletion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byDrPoodle (talk • contribs) 10:47, 30 September 2005 (UTC).

I am a 4-year-old Baptist and I have no legs. You bastards go right ahead and make jokes--What do you call a legless Baptist in a swimming pool? Bob! But I'll see you all in hell! It's not funny! Don't make jokes! You despicable mockers! You wouldn't make fun of the Prime Minister if he had a cold, would you? Is that a jellyfish coming out of Tony Blair's nose? No, it'snot! Quit mocking people's disabilities and their mucus. Snot funny. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byOne-eyed Jack (talk • contribs) 15:37, 30 September 2005 (UTC).

Why don't we also take down all the Jesus articles? They offend Christians. You know what? Let's just take the entirety of Uncyclopedia down because I'm sure that every article will have at least one person on the planet who will take offense to it. Tip: Don't take the content on Uncyclopedia seriously. --Nintendorulez 01:16, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Nothing on this site should ever be taken seriously. If you try to act sanctimonious about things on Uncylopedia, you're just begging for more jokes to be made. Nobody likes a stick-in-the-mud. One of the most important things to be able to do is to laugh at yourself. --KansaiKitsune 01:57, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Fuck you guys, I am a dictator in my country and I hate free and open debate. This sort of shit makes me feel sick. I will have the next person who comments on this issue and his entire extended family burnt to death. Guinness2702 22:36, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Yah the dictator dude's right, fuck you dudes. I'm a neo-nazi in my own country, and we regularly attend neo-nazi dry humping orgies in the woods as well as violent ak-47 demonstrated rallies (to exemplify whoever sports the best modified ak-47), and police killies as well as murdering of non-aryan races, including those members of our own organization, as well as unecessary suicide pact demonstration protests that mess with the heads of bureacrats everywhere, along with blood bathing, and I find it offensive that you have to complain about your own issues! We have issues too! Not all neo-nazis are german! You've got to recognize others too! I'm an israeli neo-nazi, for example! I mean, gosh, c'mon guys, I could use a little recognition and patronizing respect that really offers no dignity whatsoever in the long run. C'mon! It'd help people like me out you know, who're just riding the violent, fanatical cult mainstream. Just doing our job out here, so help us out. It'd be appreciated. Thank you.

As a person with a bad case of Tourettes myself, I find absolutley nothing wrong with this article. I'm not saying it is in anyway accurate in describing the actual syndrome, but it's funny, clever, and not outright offensive. Infact, I find you offensive for having a problem with this article!--Normloman 04:17, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm not whining, I'm trying to correct people's views of Tourettes because in most cases it is flawed. If the article contained no swearing (because its not directly associated with tourettes) I wouldn't mind. You can make fun of the twitchiness if you want, but if you are going to focus in on one very minimal aspect than the majority of sufferers DONT have then there is no point calling the article "Tourettes Syndrome" when a much more truthful title would be "coprialia" which is what the involuntary swearing is called! So, you could mention that coprialia is a sympton that "some" sufferers have. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by86.139.237.110 (talk • contribs) 18:05, 30 September 2005 (UTC).

But amigo, if you come to Uncyclopedia in order to present straight facts...um, wellsir, it appears you have a slight misunderstanding going on. ;) —The preceding unsigned comment was added byOne-eyed Jack (talk • contribs) 18:13, 30 September 2005 (UTC).

Good point the very fact that an Uncyclopedia article lampons Tourette's could be considered proof that this is not an accurate reflection of the conditon, I suggest you eithier go massivly overboard with the current style or rewrite it to something completly different, for instance off the top of my head, claiming that suffer's of Tourette's are the people that follow bands round a country going to every night of a tour (although I'm sure you could think of something better) --The Right HonourableMajSir ElvisUmPKUNFICMDAVFHBur.CM and barsUGMF@H (Petition) 02:49, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I think the current article is much funnier. Let's go with the "massively overboard with the current style" part. --Nintendorulez 01:16, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite

Ok, problem solved. I started the re-write that Splaka suggested and its going well. It should be finished (my contribution anyway) in a few days! —The preceding unsigned comment was added byDrPoodle (talk • contribs) 16:38, 4 October 2005 (UTC).

Rewrite? I spent a lot of time on the current article. Why must the admins delete almost all the stuff I contribute? </whining> --Nintendorulez 01:16, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Its funny how everyone who is offended by our articles fail to realize that this isnt Wikipedia --Nytrospawn 01:41, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Get a grip

Ia m 20 years old and I also have tourette syndrome. To the 17 year old. GET A GRIP. One of the best things that can help you cope with tourettes is laughing at it. I find the article very funny. It's amussing, and the only people bothered by it are people like you, people who have tourettes and think for some reason that no one can joke about it and that people with tourettes suffer all the time and that the jokes somehow cause it. Wrong. Sure, I got made fun of in school a bit, but kids will grow out of that and it will stop. Meanwhile, learn to laugh at it and stop being such a tight ass. Your just making everyone else miserable. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by129.1.73.104 (talk • contribs) 04:12, 9 November 2005 (UTC).

THANKYOU! This is what it's all about people... it's uncyclopedia, the content-free, but more importantly, the MEANING-free encyclopedia. Girls just wanna have fun! --220.101.30.98 10:22, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I can't fully understand Tourette's Syndrome because I don't have it, but what I do know is that the article was made for humor, not to harass someone. Some users who DO have it, actually think it's funny! If you want "facts", then go on Wikipedia. Ruberduck0123 10:45, December 12, 2009 (UTC)

Tourette's Syndrome is no COCKSUCKER laughing matter! Its a horrible neurological disorder THAT FUCKS YOU UP MOTHAFUCKA if u get it as bad as I do, and I find it very bizarre that 90% of people who know about Tourette's just think its Swearing...when in fact swearing only affects LESS then 30% of sufferers. A lot of TS sufferers are in pain for a hell of a long time. MOTHERFUCKING Hell, I used to get a twitch where my CLITORIS continuosly flicked across my DILDO every few seconds. The result: Cuts all the way down my tongue for months. Because the flesh was raw and in contact with SPERM AND saliva it hurt constantly and bled when my teeth cut it open again. It wasn't a laughing matter when I had to wear a thick mouth-guard to school to ease the pain, but all the jerkOFFs at my school found it amusing to see someone in pain GETTING RAPED. Refering to the original author's quote: "I spent a lot of time on the current article WHICH GAVE ME A BONER" ...come on dude, all it is is a bunch of swearwords that would have taken me a few mins to write. (Note from Lugiatm: Of course it would have only taken you a few minutes - you have Tourette's!)

I showed this article to the Vice-Chairman of the Tourettes Association (UK) and she was shocked and disgusted by its content and the fact that it makes fun out of a disorder which hardly anyone truly understands. This is precisely what she is fighting to prevent, and quite frankly, it is a huge disapointment that a TS sufferer can write this and feel proud. You sicken me. --DrPoodle 23:17, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

On Uncyclopedia, everything is a laughing matter. Get the fuck over it and go read another article. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 02:55, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I have a close friend who suffers from Tourettes who found the article hysterical, mainly BECAUSE it plays up to all of the misconceptions. I actually think the article shouldn't be nuked or changed from how it is now, if you read the "actual" text it is quite informative. There are a number of pages like this where Uncyclopedia has not shied away from difficult subjects to parady. I'm not surprised that it has a polarity of opinion, I just think its important to remember what sort of site Uncyclopedia is. If you want facts, go elsewhere. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)

I couldn't agree more with Mhaille's assessment. I think the article should stay, and that's how I voted. -- T.(talk) 04:51, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

You know, any Vice-Chairman of the X Association will find an article mocking X to be in extremely bad taste. That's like saying "Jesus would be offended if he knew some douchebag website made extensive jokes of him!". --Ninja Kow 01:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

I see what you are saying, Nintendorulz, but this would give Uncyclopedia a bad reputation, and there are many groups that, if they would see this, would sue us to hell and back. We don't want a repeat of earlier this year with e*********** d********. Laughing now?--Foo21(talk)-(edits)-(block) 15:47, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

What happended with ED? I know they hate us, but what exactly did they do? --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 17:36, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

ok ok, this has gone too far. i'm neatral in this argument but to try and stop this pointless bickering i added a warning like sophia suggested and got rid of drpoodles "edited" stuff. NOW EVERYBODY CALM DOWN!!! ITS ONLY UNCYCLOPEDIA!!! --User:86.141.88.50 19:37, 16 Nov 2005

Um, how are you neutral??? You say "i added a warning like sophia suggested in the vfd, and got rid of drpoodles edited message. hope that sorts out everything!" when you delete a fair-size chunk of the article, but according to your edit history, you are none other than User:DrPoodle. ¿Que pasa? --Carlb 20:33, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Has anyone noticed that the TALK page is almost funnier than the Article? I think we should have a new monthly award for the funniest TALK page.....I've voting for this one for November! :) -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)

Let's just replace the article with the talk page text, then, unedited. I still think the swearing gag is lame because it's been done to death. --Not DrPoodleSq.W (Talk) 21:35, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Actually, it was me. I couldnt log on until today because none of my login info was being saved and i kept logging out whenever i clicked on a link. I think the previous article was...ok, not exactly humourous, but i can see how it can upset people with TS so i deleted the bit that was directly offensive to drpoodle (i.e making a mockery of what he said) and added a warning like sophia suggested. I don't agree with reverting my edits, but if u reverted it to the actual original one i;m sure it would be funnier. --Pokerjoker 18:23, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I have to agree. The article is certainly offensive, but not really all that funny. It seems one dimensional and simply an excuse to use a lot of swearwords without any real context or overall shape.Apage 08:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Another Tourette's sufferer who thinks it's funny

I have Tourette's and have been bullied through school for it - but you know what, "Adrian"? I don't give a fuck. This article is funny - it's not meant to have any factual accuracy (it's intentions are the opposite, in fact) and it seems to have gotten quite a few laughs, including many from myself. Develop a sense of humour. Don't take things so seriously and stop being so politically correct. Tourette's may hinder your ability in life, but a stupid attitude and an inability to laugh at yourself is a lot worse. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by203.166.225.94 (talk • contribs) 11:43, 21 November 2005 (UTC).

That's a great idea. Perhaps tommorow I'll make a randomswear template. Which could also be added to Mad Libs. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 03:32, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Seems to be a huge amount of Tourette's sufferers on Uncyclopedia. Is it a prerequisite for contributing, or do you think it's something that develops through regular TWAT contributions? -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)

I am nine years old and this year I have developed ranging tics. I am beginning to believe that what I have could possibly be Tourettes's. I don't have a swearing disorder, or anything. However, I like to think I have Tourrette's and people "make jokes" aout it, but guess what? I find it funny! Don't give a shit! Sometimes my family (especially my mom) tries to urge me to control it but it's not like I can really do it. Oh, and by the way, I'm Alex Devens from up there at the top of the page, mothafucka! Back then, I didn't have tics, and now I do. I like to go on Wikipedia to learn about my condition, and go on Uncyclopedia to laugh about it. So just shut up, you tightass? You know why? Because I am nine years old and able to laugh about your condition and you are 17 and can't! So go home, open up, and rethink your life from its simplest parts.

TO PEOPLE WITH TS

Jeez, get a freaking grip. It was meant to be a joke, and someone with TS actually laughed at it (see Mhaille's quote). There was no hurt intended, and Adrian, get a username. --CloroxMUNONS (diskussion) ☃ 00:30, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

DrPoodle, it's people like you who perpetuate the divide between visibly disabled people and so-called 'normal' people. We all have weaknesses, and we all have problems. Don't expect people to respect you if you devote your life to moaning about yours. I'm a liberal, and it pisses me off when people make jokes based on the common conceptions about liberals, but I'm not going to bitch about it because people have a right to say what they like.

This article is really, really funny. Let's not take the edge off it with your PC bullshit. --Carlos the Mean 23:16, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I removed most of the swear words from the top section explaining what tourette's was. not because of pc stuff, but because they ruined the joke when they were put in places where they didn't belong. you can still find the swearing in coprolalia.--Jsonitsac 03:13, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

On the contrary, Carlos, this talk page is getting much funnier than the article ever was. We should round up a bunch of PC people and get them to start massive flame wars here, just to excercise our arguing muscles. --Joachim22 10:30, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Grey Intro

I almost insta-reverted it when it happened, but the infamous Carlb did it, and I decided that I should ask him why before reverting. And then, I decided that it might appear that I was doing something constructive, so I did not. But I suppose you could if you wanted to. SirFamine,Gun♣Petition» 02:25, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

The intro was the original article. There's not much left other than a mocking of DrPoodle if we take it out. I say just make the colors normal, as I see no reason for it to be green or gray. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 13:02, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)

The intro was a (slightly abridged) copy of the original text, modified slightly to mimic tics such as the repeated repeated words. Basically, it is being used as throwaway text - this article is a one-trick pony with the one joke being "let's swear at Uncyclopedia for confusing Tourette's Syndrome with coprolalia/swearing." No great loss if the intro were BELGIUM edited down to something much shorter. --Carlb 08:52, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

The 20 year old again with tourettes, once again telling the tightass 17 year old to lighten up

Okay, now seriously, I sicken you? or whoever said that, you have no Fucking life if you get ill from reading a God damned article on a fake online encyclopedia. You've got at least 4 people on this damn page who have tourettes and we are all older than you, we've all experienced anything you have, I myself used to flex my finger to the point that I would dislocate them. Yeah, it hurt. You get over it. As for the lady in charge of the Tourette association, UK chapter, first off, everyone in England talks as if they have some sort of speech impediment. I lived in Upper Heyford for two years, I'd know. Secondly, does she actually have tourettes, or is she just some lady who thinks because one of her kids had tourettes and got picked on in elementary that she needs to rid the world of a good joke?

So then, as you read this, please think about this, get some common sense in your head, and learn to FUCK BITCH CUNT ASSlaugh a bit.

P.S. Famous people who had tourettes:

Some baseball player Ted Nack in the 80's (he never made it too far)

Mozart (or at least historians think that he did based on his behavior)

ME (that's right bitches, I'll be famous someday-you may all touch me)

Ha! Well, that makes sense...

Hey guys and gals! Guess who just found out he has our favorite neurological disorder! I'll give you a hint... his sig is extremely hard on the eyes! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:19, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

I thought they were beaners. Here's a part of a song from a "Cheech and Chong" movie:

Beaners!
Beaners! They like to eat Beans...Beaners!
Beaners! They will kick your face...Beaners!
No wait, they are called Wetbacks (usually for the Mexican kind, not Puerto Ricans). + PotatoSmut 23:30, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

Mormon Tourette's Syndrome

I've gone with a subpage Tourette's Syndrome/Mormon as this is already the fourth version of this text (we already have the main one, the mainland China reply and the "lite" version as the other NINE-AND-A-HALF INCHES three). Iraq would be #5. :) --Carlb 04:12, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

I think they ought to be merged, since all the pages are kinda short and rely on basically the same joke. The letters simply need to be rewritten, like the Chinese one. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 20:14, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Um, the Amish and Iraq versions also change the throwaway intro just a wee bit. --Carlb 15:52, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

I beg to differ... Sticking these quotes on every page has already been done to death and really hasn't added anything humourous to the NINE-AND-A-HALF INCHES page in most cases. --Carlb 15:54, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Looks like i've lost

Fine, maybe I am COCK SHIT MOTHERFUCKER uptight about tourettes, but its only because I know so many people who are BITCH ASS CUMBUCKET affected by it. Keep the article up, but please please please change the main text of it. It is based on a plea that I wrote, and changing it and adding swearwords (i don't have coprailiaA DICK) is a pretty bitter personal insult and attack. By all means have swearwords, but don't use my PENIS as the base for the COCKSUCKER article.

-DrPoodle

According to the edit history, you are not DrPoodle, and are only impersonating him to stir up trouble. In fact, you are none other than 86.140.173.253! Scooby-dooby-doo! --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 12:41, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Fine, maybe I am uptight about tourettes, but its only because I know so many people who are affected by it. Keep the article up, but please please please change the main text of it. It is based on a plea that I wrote, and changing it and adding swearwords (i don't have coprailia) is a pretty bitter personal insult and attack. By all means have swearwords, but don't use my plea as the base for the article.--DrPoodle 19:41, 20 March 2006 (UTC) (Happy that it is ACTUALLY me now?)

Look, as a fellow GTS "sufferer," I believe this article to be one of the best possible parodies of a (sometimes) serious neurological disorder that I have had the fortune to find. Sure, I've been "picked on" for repeating myself and pulling odd faces since grade school. But let me tell you, I've not let it hold me back. I use it as part of my charm (what charm a trashcan has, anyway.) In fact, I honestly envy you, as the main bulk of this article (which has attained an impressive level of fame) is due largely to your (unwilling/unknowing) contribution. You should be proud, Poodle Man! You've made Uncyclopedia history, (like Nintendorulez madeEuroipods funny,]] and very few of us can claim that. So my humble suggestion for you is to just smile and nod, and know that you made this article what it is today. Without you, it would truly fucking suck, and no one would laugh at it. Plus, that's what having a sense of humor is all about -- if you can't laugh at yourself, you don't deserve to laugh at anything. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:08, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

While I wholeheartedly argee that it's unfair to use your letter, it's kind of too late for that. Technically, you did release it under the GFDL, and we can use it. And you did kind of ask for it by vandalising the article with the note rather than putting it on the talk page. As unfair as it is, we've already made several parodies of the letter and such, and we can't just demolish such an established joke like that. Besides, my name is mentioned on the Euroipods article and the admins refuse to change that, so I doubt they'll listen to your plea either. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 22:30, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Fine, I accept that I may have inadvertedly made the DUMBASS article humourous by complaining about it. I did not realise that things in the Talk section were released under the FREAKIN' FCC, and I meant to put it in the DOWNSTAIRS DEPARTMENT before, but didn't. Maybe we should subnmit the article to the frontpage bit? Seems that most people on here like it, and they should learn about TS by looking at my plea on the Talk section, which I just had to edit because some idiot vandalised it by adding SHIT (I am sure that editing other people's Talk bits is against the GFDL, and if it isn't, its pretty pointless, since I could edit this entire section to agree with me. Anyway, if the vandal reads this, please note that i don't have A BONER YET, BUT I WILL GET ONE IN APPROXAMITELY FIVE SECONDS ;) and so your attempt at vandalising my plea in the talk section failed. Don't do ME again. --DrPoodle 17:40, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Just found out it was KansaiKitsune who edited my Talk post. If this is against the rules, how do I go about reporting him? --DrPoodle 18:01, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Which post? And what'd he change? I'm pretty sure it's okay to fix typos and whatnot, but if it's something OVER 9,000! then it's an issue. And about talk pages being under the GFDL, if you go around SLAPPING PEOPLE IN THE FACE WITH YOUR BALLS, people will likely FUCK YOU AND YOUR FAMILY WITH THE BAD END OF A RAKE --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 19:44, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

See [1] - change was to add expletives to the paragraph at the top of this talk page where DrPoodles original complaint about this article had been moved. --Carlb 05:51, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

You know Dr.Poodle, instead of tearing up this guy's subjectively offensive article, you could simply make a NINE-AND-A-HALF INCHES article that others might think is offensive. --Ninja Kow 02:03, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

What's with the French one?

I don't see the joke with the swears, and I have no clue what the letter is supposed to say. Wtf? --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 12:46, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

In Québec, most of the swearwords are not excrement or sexual terms. They're church words.

So je te crisserai un coup de poing en tabernak, calisse, en ta hostie de gueule en sacrément would be quite rude in Joual - the slang of French-speaking Canada - but would (if translated literally) end up looking like "I shall Christ you a hit of fist in Tabernacle, Chalice, in your Communion Wafer of throat in Sacrament!". The joke is to claim that les québécois are all angels (des anges) who would never say anything dirty as they're all CHALICE of TABERNACLE a COMMUNION WAFERS deeply religious and holy people.

Try to translate French-Canadian swearing (des jurons) into English, though, and what comes out COMMUNION WAFER doesn't make a whole TABERNACLE amount of sense IN SACRED CHALICE. --Carlb 21:25, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

For the religious swearwords? There is an old joke about a travelling Bible salesman asking "You should want to buy this NINE-AND-A-HALF INCHES Bible. It has the NINE-AND-A-HALF INCHES Old Testament, it has the NINE-AND-A-HALF INCHES New Testament..." and having no idea why all of these very religious people don't seem to want to buy any NINE-AND-A-HALF INCHES Bibles from him. That seems to fit in with the whole idea of all the Québec cusswords being "chalice" this and "tabernacle" that, very religious people *lol*

First part

The first part isn't funny, it's sad and disgusting. The mockery of Adrian's letter is twisted and demented. I can't believe that someone would find that in any way humourous. I'm deleting it. Flameviper12 21:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Have you even bothered to read any of this talk page? The general consensus was that the letter stays. You could've at least brought things up for a vote before making such drastic changes. --User:Nintendorulez 11:40, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Go shove your textbook up a stoat, NINNYNINNYNINDO!

I think that CHOAD it is very offensive, and that DOG SHIT TACO you all should be ashamed of BALLS hosting this offensive NIGGER web page. After all, this CUNTRAG website is devoted to OPRHA clean and intelegent humor. Let us all JERK OFF be respectful of others and FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK show some class in this matter. To all those thinking of deleting this PENIS article, I say to you... GROW A FUCKING SENSE OF HUMOR!!!!!!!

Oh noes, PENIS someone got STAR JONES offended by an article on SHITTER Uncyclopedia. Maybe the CRAZY FROG solution to BRITNEY that is to BUTTHOLE PLEASURE go to Wikipedia. Or maybe SHIT just sit in a FUCKINGSHITASSHOLE go in a corner and cry?

I've been diagnosed with Tourette's, and the only problem I have with the article is that it could be funnier. Seriously, nobody should come to this site expecting reliable information about anything. There are uncyclopedia articles for 9/11, the Holocaust, and tons of other touchy subjects. If you don't want to be offended, don't read them. That said, the part of the article mocking Adrian's post is simply unfunny and juvenile. Not that I care enough to delete it or anything. --Volcano worshipper 01:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Not really up for deletion is it?

Seriously, are the thingies at the bottom just apart of the joke right? I'm siding with the Tourette-afflicted, it's funny, and we all know that the afflicted aren't all like this, just how we know not all Muslims are terrorists but say so here in Uncyclopedia. For example, there was this 'Tory Map of the World', a map of the world according to someone apart of the British Conservative Party as a forum topic. The British Isles was the largest continent in the world, with the M1 seperating England and Scotland. Russia labelled as RUSSIAN COMMIE BASTARDS and the like. Down where you had South Asia, India and Pakistan, you had PAKIS. I found it hilarious and you know what? To ignorant racist bastards, I am a paki myself. Yet, you had all the white folk goin' on about 'OMG, this is RACIST!!! MUST BE TAKEN DOWN!!!'. Political correctness my ass. I, a 'paki', found it funny, just as how people with Tourette's find this funny. Hmm, well, turns out my simple question has turned into an essay...whatever...so, is this article really up for deletion? Seriphyn (on Wikipedia) 81.170.4.234 17:48, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

No, the custom VFD template links to an archived vote for deletion, not an active one. —rc(t) 18:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

A Falsity.

"Do people make jokes about cancer? No. So don't make fun of disorders"

Loading problems

When I looked at this article, some of the expletive templates were not working, messing the bottom half of the page up (at least for me anyway). This article appears to be at the limit of how many templates it can manage, as removing a few of them helped.

Out of curiosity, is there a limit to the number of templates an article can have, or is it too much load on the server? 213.165.173.124 16:26, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Article written in the style of its subject

This article is funny because it is written in the real or imagined writing style of its subject.

Shit shit shit! Fuck! This is tourettes

Deleting this FUCKING SHIT article would be FUCKING inconsiderate to FUCKING people with FUCKING tourettes syndrone SHIT HEADS! PISS!

In the current state of this page, deletion would be no great NINE-AND-A-HALF INCHES loss. The page is so overloaded with NINE-AND-A-HALF INCHES {{expletive}} templates that adding more doesn't add humour, it just makes the page look more like rubbish. No idea why the intro (and the bit about the st-st-stuttering) is full of expletives, and the text is turning into just as much a pile of useless fabricated NINE-AND-A-HALF INCHES quotes that one must skip to find the actual article as everything else on this NINE-AND-A-HALF INCHES site. Pity, this was once a not-half-bad entry. Oh well.

Oh SHIT, come on

This FUCK is a humor TWAT website. It is BULLSHIT not like WikiFUCKpedia. Can't you appreciate ASS humor?

THAT'S NOT FUNNY!

You FUCKING people on this site FAGS are mean to us with Tourette's (tick) syndrome (spasm) and you gonna pay for this MUTHAFUCKA BITCHES. The level of cruelty made me sad ASSHOLE and you hurt my feelings. SUCK MY BALLS. We will sue you RICH FAT FUCKS for the pain (tick), humility (spasm) and defamation it caused to us HELL. Tourette's syndrome sufferers. DIE YOU FAG. You hadn't seen the last of me. GODDAMN CUNT SUCKERS. - signed by anon IP

Good Job GOD DAMN IT

I ICK have tourette's. UGH I am 123456789 KABOOM 10 years old. My parents PEE AND SHIT ON EACH OTHER love me for who I am FUCKIN STUPID special. Its hard to get by HA HA HA school with TIT Tourette's ICK, and my classmates make FUCKIN fun of me ACK all the time. DIE YOU ALL FAGS. Why do they? BITCHES. I want them EEP to know tourette's TIC should not be UMP made fun of UH and I need the support to POOP ON DICK to make enough friends MOTHERFUCKERS to get me through it. YAP. So please ASS HOLE stop making fun of me CLICK and anyone else with Tourette's. GO TO HELL. Because FUCK you will be sorry. BUTTMUNCH. - signed by anon IP