I'm one. I actually posted almost that very thing minus the cowering part. And Bell is a pussy for even considering apologizing. He didn't say anything that thousands of Bostonian's weren't probably thinking.

All kinds of people vote. Not enough of those people think highly enough of Trump to make him President but all kinds of people vote.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger

So, if they were polling better than Trump and the primary goal was to prevent Hillary from becoming POTUS, perhaps it would have been a better strategic decision to nominate someone who actually had a chance of beating her and preventing that than nominating Donald Trump.

some Bostonians may not like guns, and that's fine...
some Bostonians may not believe in God, and that's fine...

But all those Bostonians were praying to God that people with guns would protect them

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach|

All kinds of people vote. Not enough of those people think highly enough of Trump to make him President but all kinds of people vote.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger

So, if they were polling better than Trump and the primary goal was to prevent Hillary from becoming POTUS, perhaps it would have been a better strategic decision to nominate someone who actually had a chance of beating her and preventing that than nominating Donald Trump.

Of course cops are people. Highly trained people who wear body armor and are actually a part of finding the suspects.

The idea that this situation would have been safer or would have come to a more positive end because amateurs had guns is crazy balls.

Rhetoric like this just perpetuates the negative stereotypes of gun owners as out of touch cowboys that think not only that guns are the solution to problems, but that bigger and more powerful guns are.

Hell, if there was people "cowering in their homes wishing they had an AR-15 with a hi-capacity magazine" they'd be misinformed. For close quarters home defense a shotgun is going to be more effective and less likely to unintentionally hurt others in or around the home.

Of course cops are people. Highly trained people who wear body armor and are actually a part of finding the suspects.

The idea that this situation would have been safer or would have come to a more positive end because amateurs had guns is crazy balls.

Rhetoric like this just perpetuates the negative stereotypes of gun owners as out of touch cowboys that think not only that guns are the solution to problems, but that bigger and more powerful guns are.

Hell, if there was people "cowering in their homes wishing they had an AR-15 with a hi-capacity magazine" they'd be misinformed. For close quarters home defense a shotgun is going to be more effective and less likely to unintentionally hurt others in or around the home.

Considering the way this guy was armed, and considering the number of shoot outs he was involved in, An AR 15 could actually be a practical weapon. But please, continue to lecture those of us who own and shoot firearms on what type of weapon is best for certain situations.

__________________
"Serious sport has nothing to do with fair play. It is bound up with hatred, jealousy, boastfulness, and disregard of all the rules."

Of course cops are people. Highly trained people who wear body armor and are actually a part of finding the suspects.

The idea that this situation would have been safer or would have come to a more positive end because amateurs had guns is crazy balls.

Rhetoric like this just perpetuates the negative stereotypes of gun owners as out of touch cowboys that think not only that guns are the solution to problems, but that bigger and more powerful guns are.

Hell, if there was people "cowering in their homes wishing they had an AR-15 with a hi-capacity magazine" they'd be misinformed. For close quarters home defense a shotgun is going to be more effective and less likely to unintentionally hurt others in or around the home.

We're talking about a heavily armed terrorist very possibly wearing an armored vest. You take the shotgun, I'll man the AR-15 thank you.

Of course cops are people. Highly trained people who wear body armor and are actually a part of finding the suspects.

The idea that this situation would have been safer or would have come to a more positive end because amateurs had guns is crazy balls.

Rhetoric like this just perpetuates the negative stereotypes of gun owners as out of touch cowboys that think not only that guns are the solution to problems, but that bigger and more powerful guns are.

Hell, if there was people "cowering in their homes wishing they had an AR-15 with a hi-capacity magazine" they'd be misinformed. For close quarters home defense a shotgun is going to be more effective and less likely to unintentionally hurt others in or around the home.

And this kind of comment just reinforces the stereotype of a typical pedantic liberal jackass that thinks just because he watched an episode of NCIS he knows **** all about the practical applications of firearms, particularly as a means for home defense.

__________________
“You may think RaiderH8r is just a thinker. But I’m not just a thinker. I’m a doer. Every day I go out there, and rev that engine, fire it up, grab a hold of that line between speed and chaos, and wrestle it to the ground like a demon cobra. And when the fear rises up in my belly, I use it. Fear is powerful, because it’s been there for billions of years. And it is good. And I use it. And I ride it; I ride it like a skeleton horse through the gates of hell.”