Scarlett Johansson Talks Going Nude For UNDER THE SKIN; New Posters Released

The Captain America: TWS actress isn't usually one for stripping off in her movies, but for her role as an alien seductress in Jonathan Glazer’s upcoming sci-fi thriller, Johansson felt it was necessary. There's also a new batch of creepy minimalist posters.

Follow Mark:

By Mark Cassidy - 3/12/2014

“I’m a pretty private person. It’s not like I want to be displaying myself all over the place,” the Avengers star explains to Yahoo. “But I think I realized that through the process of just letting go, and allowing myself as the character to be totally present in the moment, and making the discovery of my own self, as [my character] does… I realized what kind of judgement I place on myself, and how self-conscious I am about all different kinds of things. That wasn’t just the nudity, but many different situations, where I just had to… we just couldn’t capture what we needed unless I was totally free of myself. That, in a sense, was very liberating.”

In search of loners, Laura (Scarlett Johansson) drives around the exquisitely moody landscapes of the Scottish highlands. She’s an alien, sent from afar and equipped with enough human language and awesome seductive power to capture, destroy and presumably send home human males. And then, her curiosity about her human body and an accidental act of pity disrupt her mission.

DISCLAIMER: This article was submitted by a volunteer contributor who has agreed to our code of conduct. ComicBookMovie.com is protected from liability under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) and "safe harbor" provisions. CBM will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please contact us for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. You may also learn more about our copyright and trademark policies HERE.

7

Think this article is front page worthy? Click on the "thumbs up" to the right! Popular articles will appear on the homepage automatically!

Who cares about her being topless? If this was a couple years ago I'd have been excited, but since she got rid of the twins on her chest that made her popular in the first place it doesn't matter. It's like the playboy a fading starlet poses for 10 years after anyone wanted to see what was hiding beneath the clothes. Sure she's naked but it's a letdown on what it could have been.

Alexandre, and? What's that got to do with anything? Anything too overly sexual or just plain disgusting is not allowed to be posted on the site...that's that. Why don't you guys try to use your brains and converse about the subject at hand instead of posting a [frick]ing gif every second comment. This site's community has turned into a joke.