Actually I think a majority falls under a split because its the same thing really, two judges saw it for one and one saw it for the other. Unanimous has to mean they all saw one fighter win is my understanding.

Actually I think a majority falls under a split because its the same thing really, two judges saw it for one and one saw it for the other. Unanimous has to mean they all saw one fighter win is my understanding.

Not quite. Your right about UD's, but a majority decision means two judges scored it for one fighter and one judge scored it a draw. A split decision is when one judge sees it the other way.

I'm 5-0-1 so far tonight with like 38 points I believe And hit the first part of my parley on Dos Anjos. Looking good so far.

Is a mistake, twice over. Not only is the 29-28 reversed around wrong but either the Decision itself was wrong as 30-27 30-27 28-29 is a split decision not a majority decision or the Score was read off wrong.

Last edited 1/11/10 8:46PM server time by PookieEdit note/reason: n/a2 total post edits

Actually I think a majority falls under a split because its the same thing really, two judges saw it for one and one saw it for the other. Unanimous has to mean they all saw one fighter win is my understanding.

Not quite. Your right about UD's, but a majority decision means two judges scored it for one fighter and one judge scored it a draw. A split decision is when one judge sees it the other way.

I'm 5-0-1 so far tonight with like 38 points I believe And hit the first part of my parley on Dos Anjos. Looking good so far.

maybe so, but the judge didnt score it a draw, he scored it 29-28 lennox, so the majority decision was the wrong verdict on the fight