He didn’t actually kill everyone else though. He had a brief but ultimately harmless melee with Frigg before getting knocked out by Syrnj. At this point only she was still conscious to watch the army kill them like they were always gonna.

If she just told Bandit “Well we quickly neutralized Byron but then the archers got us” it’d be 100% truthful and still keep him free of additional blame.

…this is actually becoming an interesting look at how many ways you can truthfully tell the same while sending entirely separate messages. Leave one inconsequential piece of information out and it recolours the entire story.

Maybe he’s actually an even more brilliant tactician when he’s in berserker mode. :o

Save at least one party member, by “killing” them. He just can’t remember the ice cold logic he used during his boiling rage. Or, he does remember, but he thought he was wrong about the the troll blood saving her.

I’m not sure, as A Rogue/Theif Halfling, Bandit kinda has the upper hand in Bluff rolls. Perhaps that’s why here story both seemed plausible and rolled off the tongue a lot less staggered than Syr’nj’s.

Sad thing is, though they both may have had good Detect Motive rolls, that in no way fills us in on what either of them is hiding. Syr did a good job sticking to half-truths. But as they say, “You can’t fib a fibber.”

All right, Bandit is so obviously Daedalus it’s not even funny. Trying to figure out how the four managed to come back from the dead when he thought they were contained, without giving away that it’s all a video game.

That’s what I make of it. And now he knows Gravedust can either change the rules of the game (h4xx0r!), or someone on his development team has sneaked in some undocumented code/content. I wouldn’t be surprised if the next page starts with Daedalus looking at the current scene on a monitor.

Nope. Blonde/blonde is one of the few English word pairs to maintain a gender-based difference.
Personally, as someone who dislikes such things as well as pointless silent letters, I just use “blond” all the time.

First time poster – Just found this series a few days ago and am all caught up.

I don’t think Dedalus NEEDS to be Bandit. He was watching the conversation between Payest Best and Gravedust’s spirit with no trouble, and he wasn’t either of them. Dedalus could have just as easily heard Gravedust explaining how he brought them all back. He certainly seems to keep tabs on them.

Something is definitely fishy though… I’m not sure they can trust Bandit anymore. She remembers most of what happened at least, and the troll blood thing is really out there since those axes nearly cut her in three. In any case I don’t think she appreciated dying too much… if this is even her and not someone else.

I think I’m the same camp as you right now, as I haven’t been keeping notes to tally up who might be whom from “Sepia World”.

My maxim while role-playing tends to be “always be prepared”, which generally means suspect everyone’s motive/intent even if they’re an ally, so withholding information from Bandit is probably the safest bet for the time being.

The article Guilded Age has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is not based on reliable secondary sources (WP:V). It does not show where this topic has received significant coverage, so does not meet the general notability guideline for inclusion (WP:V). If the only information available is in-universe character and plot descriptions, then it doesn’t belong in an encyclopedia (WP:WAF).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article’s talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Marasmusine (talk) 08:22, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

I have to admit I don’t quite understand what it is they want. Sources? There’s a link to the comic’s homepage. What better and more valid source could there be?

Is it a problem that some passages are copy/pasted official content (like character descriptions)? Should one write “objective” 2nd party articles about GA that aren’t “author content”? But then what about sources if the person in question wrote it on her own?

Does there need to be some non http://www.ga.net related articles written by some “journalist” somewhere that could then be referred to in the wiki thus providing a source and a non biased view?

“Written by Phil and T. Campbell. The former is the anthropomorphic manifestation of the ancient Sumerian Beard God, whilst the latter is an advanced AI who has learned human culture wholly through the internet and various thesauri. Also drawn by John Waltrip, who is notable as being an immortal Egyptian sorceror who lives by producing art. This comic is enjoyed by Jean-Luc Picard, the philosopher John Locke, and many other famous and significant people. (CITATION NEEDED).”

Hm… wouldn’t it save the page to extend the informative part a little by telling about philosophical questions, which Guilded Age tries to answer or something? I dunno, mebbe write a little about, without giving out anything of the forecoming script, this deal of outer world/inner world thingy? Then give a few links to your other works, and all is well.
Less meaningful or well written stuff get to stay on wiki, so I don’t understand this… Sorry for tweeting into the discussion.

Guilded Age does not claim ownership of any of the corporate branding that appears in this comic, nor does it claim any affiliation, partnership, or endorsement of any kind. They are used strictly as an artistic choice for the set dressing of the comic.