Vaccines – Are They the New “Crimes Against Humanity?”

Part 2…

In Part 1 we saw how the science, and the people involved with developing vaccines, have been completely corrupted in order to support America’s mandatory vaccines policy – no matter what.

What we didn’t mention were two of the most influential medical associations that are primary promoters of mandatory vaccines for all children…no matter what! They should most certainly be included in the IG Farben-like cabal that has been created and enforce compulsory vaccines in America.

“Under new policy, the AMA will seek more stringent state immunization requirements to allow exemptions only for medical reasons,” the organization said in a press release.”

Similarly, the American Academy of Pediatrics, whose members make much of their living vaccinating children during their “well baby visits”, are in the front lines in the campaign to vaccinate all children in America.

These two groups, along with all the other organizations, civic groups included, not to mention members of the press who refuse to do their due diligence as watchdogs of our government, should all be considered part of the American IG Farben-like cabal of common interests.

After WWII, the people responsible for IG Farben’s group behavior were those who were put on trial at the Nazi War Crimes Trials at Nuremberg. The hideous nature of their crimes against humanity resulted in the creation of the Nuremberg Code.

“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.”

Politics Make Strange Bedfellows…

For committed Anti-Trumpers, no matter what, this info is for you.

When you are active in politics, you quickly learn that the folks who are your bitterest enemies in some political fight this week may turn out to be your greatest allies in the next big fight. The issue of compulsory vaccinations is one of those fights.

Why is that important? Because Dr. Price has been a longtime member of the Association of American Physicians & Surgeons.

This is their official position on mandatory vaccines…….

Public policy regarding vaccines is fundamentally flawed. It is permeated by conflicts of interest. It is based on poor scientific methodology (including studies that are too small, too short, and too limited in populations represented), which is, moreover, insulated from independent criticism. The evidence is far too poor to warrant overriding the independent judgments of patients, parents, and attending physicians, even if this were ethically or legally acceptable.

AAPS opposes federal mandates for vaccines, on principle, on the grounds that they are:

An unconstitutional expansion of the power of the federal government.

An unconstitutional delegation of power to a public-private partnership.

An unconstitutional and destructive intrusion into the patient-physician and parent-child relationships.

A violation of the Nuremberg Code in that they force individuals to have medical treatment against their will, or to participate in the functional equivalent of a vast experiment without fully informed consent.

A violation of rights to free speech and to the practice of one’s religion (which may require one to keep oaths).

What follows is the Congressional testimony of AAPS’s Executive Director, Jane Orient, MD, at a hearing regarding mandating Hepatitis B vaccine to the schedule.

STATEMENT of the ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS to the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy, and Human Resources of the Committee on Government Reform U.S. House of Representatives..

RE: HEPATITIS B VACCINE

Submitted by Jane Orient, M.D.
June 14, 1999

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee:

Jane Orient MD – AAPS

My name is Jane Orient, M.D. I am a practicing internist from Tucson, Arizona, and serve as the Executive Director of the Association of American Physicians & Surgeons (“AAPS”).

AAPS is a nationwide organization of physicians devoted to defending the sanctity of the patient-physician relationship. AAPS revenue is derived almost exclusively from membership dues. We receive no government funding, foundation grants, or revenue from vaccine manufacturers. No members of our governing body (the Board of Directors), have a conflict of interest because of a position with an agency making vaccine policy or any entity deriving profits from mandatory vaccines.

AAPS thanks this Committee and Chairman Mica for leaving the record open for a longer period to permit an opportunity to review the hearing transcript, written testimony, and raw data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

It is apparent that critical medical decisions for an entire generation of American children are being made by small committees whose members have incestuous ties with agencies that stand to gain power, or manufacturers that stand to gain enormous profits, from the policy that is made. Even if such members recuse themselves from specific votes, they are permitted to participate in discussions and thus influence the decision. Moreover, there is the potential for deal- making. Or there may be a simple disinclination to cause problems for one member’s agenda in the expectation that that member will reciprocate.

Once a vaccine is mandated for children, the manufacturer and the physician administering the vaccine are substantially relieved of liability for adverse effects. The relationship of patient and physician is dramatically altered: in administering the vaccine, the physician is serving as the agent of the state. To the extent that the physician simply complies without making an independent evaluation of the appropriateness of the vaccine for each patient, he is abdicating his responsibility under the Oath of Hippocrates to “prescribe regimen for the good of my patients according to my ability and my judgment and never do harm to anyone.”

Should a physician advise against a mandated vaccine, he faces increased legal liability should the patient acquire the disease. Moreover, he may risk his very livelihood if he is dependent upon income from “health plans” that use vaccine compliance as a measure of “quality.”

It is perhaps not surprising, although still reprehensible, that physicians sometimes behave in a very callous manner toward parents who question the need for certain vaccines.

Federal policy of mandating vaccines marks a profound change in the concept of public health. Traditionally, public health authorities restricted the liberties of individuals only in case of a clear and present danger to public health. For example, individuals infected with a transmissible disease were quarantined. Today, a child may be prevented from attending school or associating with others simply because of being unimmunized. If there is not an outbreak of disease and if the child is uninfected, his or her unimmunized state is not a threat to anyone. An abridgement of civil rights in such cases cannot be justified.

With hepatitis B vaccine, the case for mandatory immunization with few exemptions is far less persuasive than with smallpox or polio vaccines, which protected against highly lethal or disabling, relatively common, and easily transmissible diseases. An intelligent and conscientious physician might well recommend AGAINST hepatitis B vaccine, especially in newborns, unless a baby is at unusual risk because of an infected mother or household contact or membership in a population in which disease is common.

AAPS awaits the release of full information concerning the licensure of hepatitis B vaccine and the mandate for newborn immunizations, as requested under the Freedom of Information Act by the National Vaccine Information Center. It is imperative that independent scientists have the opportunity to review the raw data. In the meantime, all coercive means for increasing the immunization rate should be immediately discontinued. Fully informed consent should be sought before vaccine is administered. This requires full and honest disclosure of the risks and uncertainties of the vaccine, in comparison with the risks of the disease.

Information given to parents about this vaccine often does not meet the requirement for full disclosure. For example, it may state that “getting the disease is far more likely to cause serious illness than getting the vaccine.” This may be literally true, but it is seriously misleading if the risk of getting the disease is nearly zero (as is true for most American newborns). It may also be legalistically true that “no serious reactions have been known to occur due to the hepatitis B recombinant vaccine.” However, relevant studies have not been done to investigate whether the temporal association of vaccine with serious side effects is purely coincidental or not.

An independent review of the VAERS data; publications by governmental, pro-vaccine, and anti-vaccine groups; and a sample of the medical literature leads to the following conclusions:

For most children, the risk of a serious vaccine reaction may be 100 times greater than the risk of hepatitis B.

Overall, the incidence of hepatitis B in the U.S. is currently about 4 per 100,000. The risk for most young children is far less; hepatitis B is heavily concentrated in groups at high risk due to occupation, sexual promiscuity, or drug abuse.

VAERS contains 25,000 reports related to hepatitis B vaccine, about one-third of which were serious enough to lead to an emergency room visit, hospitalization, or death. It is often assumed that only 10% of reactions are reported. (This committee has heard testimony about persons being actively discouraged from reporting, even if they are aware of the reporting system.) Thus, if there have been some 80,000 serious adverse reactions associated with 20 million doses of vaccine, the risk is about 4 in 1000.

(This calculation depends on many assumptions. Moreover, many of the patients experiencing temporally associated adverse reactions had simultaneously received more than one vaccine. Nevertheless, a better estimate has not been put forth.)

It should be noted that a less than 1 in 1,000,000 purely hypothetical risk may be used to justify costly federal regulations on highly useful products that are used voluntarily.

In nearly 20% of VAERS reports, the first of eight listed side effects suggests central nervous system involvement.

Examining the first listed effects shows about 4,600 involving such symptoms as prolonged screaming, agitation, apnea, ataxia, visual disturbances, convulsions, tremors, twitches, an abnormal cry, hypotonia, hypertonia, abnormal sensations, stupor, somnolence, neck rigidity, paralysis, confusion, and oculogyric crisis. The last is a striking feature of post-encephalitic Parkinson’s disease, or it may occur as a dystonic reaction to certain drugs such as phenothiazines.

The CDC admits that the results of ongoing studies on a potential association of hepatitis B vaccine and demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis are not yet available.

There may be large genetic differences in susceptibility to vaccine adverse effects.

The committee has been told that serious reported adverse effects seem restricted to Caucasians. Yet the oft-cited long-term safety study was conducted in Alaskan natives, and many studies involved Asians. In adults, 77% of the reactions involve women, who are generally more susceptible to autoimmune diseases. This deserves serious study, not off-hand dismissal (“nurses always over-report”). Universal immunization could lead to disproportionate injury to susceptible populations, who might also be the least affected by the disease one is trying to prevent.

Striking increases in chronic illnesses have occurred in temporal association with an increase in vaccination rates.

Asthma and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, causes of lifelong morbidity and frequent premature death, have nearly doubled in incidence since the introduction of many new, mandatory vaccines. There is no explanation for this increase. The temporal association, although not probative, is suggestive and demands intense investigation. Instead of following up on earlier, foreign studies suggesting a greater-than-chance association, the CDC, through vaccine mandates, is obliterating the control group (unvaccinated children).

Dr. Classen testified concerning his opinion that hepatitis B vaccine could precipitate diabetes mellitus. Of note, VAERS contains more than 4,000 reports of abdominal symptoms that could have been due to pancreatitis, which was probably not specifically sought and thus missed if present.

Even more alarming is the huge increase in reports of autism and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, with devastating, life-long impacts. Much of this could be due to overdiagnosis (now rewarded by numerous government subsidies). The change in behavior that many parents observe related to vaccines could be coincidental, or it might reflect a desperate need to explain a disastrous occurrence. Nonetheless, the implications are so grave that immediate investigation is needed. Measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis B, and the whole panoply of childhood diseases are a far less serious threat than having a large fraction (say 10%) of a generation afflicted with learning disability and/or uncontrollable aggressive behavior because of an impassioned crusade for universal vaccination.

There are plausible mechanisms such as molecular mimicry whereby vaccines could have such effects. Basic research, as well as epidemiologic studies (starting with a long-term follow-up of reactions reported to VAERS), is urgent.

Hepatitis B vaccine as a cause of sudden infant death has not been ruled out.

The mere observation that the incidence of SIDS has decreased while hepatitis B immunization rates have increased proves nothing whatsoever. In other contexts, the Back to Sleep campaign is credited with a dramatic fall in SIDS; the fall might have been much greater without hepatitis B immunizations. The presence of findings such as brain edema in healthy infants who die very soon after receiving hepatitis B vaccine is profoundly disturbing, especially in view of the frequency of neurologic symptoms in the VAERS.

Does SIDS occur on the day after hepatitis B vaccine with a greater-than-expected frequency? Does it occur at a younger-than-expected age? Are the autopsy findings different in babies who just received the vaccine? The fact that vaccine just happens to be given during the time period that babies are most likely to die of SIDS complicates the analysis. Also, there are a number of other confounding variables (sleep position, socioeconomic status, and possibly smoking behavior).

The data in VAERS are probably too incomplete to answer the questions. A very detailed statistical analysis and an aggressive attempt to obtain more complete information are urgently needed. Glib reassurance, based on the secular trends shown to this Committee, is dangerous.

CONCLUSIONS

Public policy regarding vaccines is fundamentally flawed. It is permeated by conflicts of interest. It is based on poor scientific methodology (including studies that are too small, too short, and too limited in populations represented), which is, moreover, insulated from independent criticism. The evidence is far too poor to warrant overriding the independent judgments of patients, parents, and attending physicians, even if this were ethically or legally acceptable.

AAPS opposes federal mandates for vaccines, on principle, on the grounds that they are:

An unconstitutional expansion of the power of the federal government.

An unconstitutional delegation of power to a public-private partnership.

An unconstitutional and destructive intrusion into the patient-physician and parent-child relationships.

A violation of the Nuremberg Code in that they force individuals to have medical treatment against their will, or to participate in the functional equivalent of a vast experiment without fully informed consent.

A violation of rights to free speech and to the practice of one’s religion (which may require one to keep oaths).

AAPS would specifically oppose the campaign for universal immunization against hepatitis B, even if the above did not apply, because the safety of the vaccine is in question.

The CDC, of course, ignored this testimony…

I think we are heading, here in the US, to our own version of Nuremberg…

9 thoughts on “Vaccines – Are They the New “Crimes Against Humanity?””

Something to think about….
What is so heartbreaking about the use of cannabis is the ignorant stigma that is attached to it. I hear so many people talk about ailments and dead-end treatments with side effects that are more disabling than the disease itself. Yet when you mention medicinal cannabis, they look at you like…….., well, those of us in the know, know exactly what I mean.
In many of these situations, quality of life is either beginning to fade or is pretty much snuffed out. So, because of the legal vs. illegal implications State to State, coupled with the Stigma, people would rather suffer than take a chance on something that promotes and provides quality of life. Hmmmm…. I am as equally befuddled by that, as they are about Marijauna/Cannabis/Ganja/Pot/Weed etc.
Think about how desperate one becomes to find the right medical diagnosis, treatment and or pharmaceutical, to stop the suffering. By the time one has tried and failed all that there is, wouldn’t you think you would welcome something that works?
I can for 100% tell you, for me it was a no-brainer. My daughters life was declining rapidly with all the treatments and pharmaceuticals I thought were suppose to help. The side effects, ER visits, seizures, secondary injuries, lost childhood, missed events, inability to care for herself, cognition delays, sleeplessness, family impact, failure after failure, heartbreak after heartbreak, fear and desperation on levels one should never have to face, hoping and believing in a system that was failing her.
Ask yourself, after all of that, watching your loved one ripped and ravaged apart, is it really worth it? If there is one more thing you have not tried, but you have heard about with promising effects, should you try it? After all isn’t that what mainstream medicine is all about? Trial and error? Once you get beyond one pharmaceutical the interactions of multiple medications is anyone’s guess, as we all respond and react differently.
For me it has always been about quality of life with the least amount of harm. I did and will always do what achieves the best quality of life, LEGAL OR NOT!!! After trying all the Legal Acceptable treatments, my daughter was a zombie for 4 long years. CANNABIS GAVE HER BACK TO ME. LET THEM TRY TO TELL ME OTHERWISE, THEY HAVE HAD THEIR CHANCE, FAILED AND HAVE CAUSED IRREPARABLE HARM!!!!! In a court of law how could this evidence be ignored?
THEY HAVE LOST THIS MOTHERS TRUST!
I only WISH I gave my daughter MARIJAUNA as her first line of defense. SO MUCH COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED!!!

So the list of crimes against humanity ‘defendants’ is headed by the AMA, the CDC. and the AAP… to which those media sources (e.g. the Boston Herald for demanding the public hanging of anti-vaxxers) that fail to do their homework need to be added… plus the FDA and those in DC as well as state medical licensing boards, and insurers end up as john-does…

but what court would adjudicate these cases since the list of victims is worldwide…… and who’s going to choose and pay the prosecutors… ttyl

With the 1948 official report by the recognized scientists chosen by the “Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry” who tasked them with determining the toxicity and relative safety of the use of certain organic mercury compounds to the American Medical Society (AMA) [Morton HE, North LL, Engley FB. The bacteriostatic and bactericidal action of some compounds on hemolytic streptococci. JAMA 1948; 136: 36-41 and other similar published papers], it was clear from the introductory statement on page 36 that the “antiseptic” then named “merthiolate”, now more commonly known as “Thimerosal”, should not be used in any medicine as an antiseptic or preservative.
In spite of this report and other similarly definitive relative toxicity and effectiveness studies, the AMA continued to support the use of organic and inorganic mercury compounds in medicine and, to date, though the Food and Drug Administration of the USA outlawed the use of Thimerosal/Merthiolate and any other mercury-based topical drug products sold, where the previously accepted limit had been about 0.1%, for over-the-counter use in the 1980s, the FDA continues to “defend” the use of Thimerosal at levels up to 0.0125% as a preservative in biological drug products including vaccines w/o any proof of safety (note: epidemiological studies CANNOT prove safety — only suitable SPECIFIC TOXICITY Studies can PROVE SAFETY!
Yet, despite an ever-increasing body of scientifically sound epidemiological studies showing EVIDENCE OF HARM and several toxicity studies in rats and monkeys proving that the use of THIMEROSAL in developing humans is POSSIBLY safe ONLY when the specific dose of THIMEROSAL is LESS THAN (<) 1 nanogram (ng) of Thimerosal (< 0.5 ng organic mercury from Thimerosal per kg of weight in developing humans [ http://dr-king.com/docs/090812_fnldrft_TheTruthAboutTheToxicityOfThimerosalr5b.pdf ].

I’m not sure every vaccine is harmful but my view is based upon the right of parents to make an informed decision whether or not to vaccinate their children. If parents decide to agree to their children’s vaccination, then surely they have the right to unbiased information about risks and benefits. As of now, things are so skewed in favour of the vaccinators that parents do not have the information to make such an informed choice.

Back in the 1970s, there was no talk of autism, but working in a mental hospital in the UK I remember a male adult ward seeing men described as having ‘the bodies of men and the minds of babies’. I remember their visits by elderly parents and the sadness of those parents whose lives had been shattered by their loss. All staff accepted that they were the victims of the pertussis vaccine and when my daughter was born, like many parents we refused the pertussis vaccine.

Times have changed. Nowadays in the UK parents are told that there is no danger by doctors who receive bonuses based upon the number of vaccinations given. The system is corrupt. The analogy with IG Farben I sort of accept, but many medics and many academics who are aware of the dangers believe that vaccination is a public good and those whose lives are damaged is a price worth paying.

The right to informed choice for parents is the way to go in my opinion, and is probably more realistic.

I notice from the comments made on the above article that some people still aren’t convinced – even though scientists employed at the United States Center for Disease Control have long said, yes, vaccinations cause autism according to their data.

Although outside of our normal domain, over the years the Vitamin C Foundation has examined the question whether vaccines cause autism . While I personally don’t like to think about all these children being deliberately harmed by an orchestrated campaign to keep truthful information from the American public, i should be undeniable in 2017 that Big-Pharma-controlled-FDA policies are decimating children, especially California children these days..

Here are a few high points from our forum discussions.

In my opinion, there is no doubt that a long series of vaccinations, especially, certain ones like MMR, has led to the increased incidence of Autism (and mental disability, which is now estimated at 1 in 10. ) When I was a child (a long time ago) there were far fewer vaccinations and the rate of autism was less then 1 child in 100. According to Drs. Hal Huggins and Thomas E Levy in their co-authored book UNIFORMED CONSENT, the rate of autism increased in the mid 1970s as the formula for mercury amalgams was changed, making fillings more toxic. Today the numbers are staggering, especially for a mother with mercury fillings, who has a vaccination during her pregnancy, and she isn’t told how important it is to supplement vitamin C!

A foreign enemy couldn’t be doing much more to harm America.

Why do I believe that mercury causes autism (and Alzheimer’s).. (other than government scientists admitting that it is true)?

A few years ago there was a “Mercury Seminar” in Naperville Illinois hosted by mercury-free dentist Diane Meyer, DDS (Note: She no longer practices because the state of Illinois took away her license.) The Mercury Toxicity event was filmed by at least 2 separate film crews – but these films have never been released.

Someday, should we have the resources, the Vitamin C Foundation wants and publish those Seminar lectures on video, especially the lecture by Mayer Eisenstein, MD. Dr. Mayer Eisenstein was a pediatrician. He explained why NO CHILD WAS VACCINATED in his practice, and that the results were that there was NOT ONE CASE OF AUTISM in his practice of 30,000 children. In Illinois, the good doctor could write a “doctor’s note” which parents used to excuse their children from the shots. (Unfortunately, the good doctor is no longer with us, one of the 60 dead prominent alternative doctors since early 2015.)

So how did he keep is children well without vaccinations.. Think vitamins D, C etc..

Eisenstein said that he was mentored by his University of Illinois medical school professor who served in the U. S. Public health department. The mentor was a scholar and studied the vaccine data. Surprisingly, his careful research found that vaccines were not doing anything to benefit public health. No data to support this assumption. Soon after taking that stance, he was “nudged out of Government and back to teaching at Illinois. (Many scholars have noticed that there is no correlation to taking vaccines and the incidence of infectious diseases. There is a lot of data that better public health conditions, e.g. improved sewage, etc., was correlated. Dr. Suzanne Humphries has co-authored a book on this.https://www.amazon.com/Dissolving-Illusions-Disease-Vaccines-Forgotten/dp/1480216895/ref=sr_1_fkmr1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1494938048&sr=8-1-fkmr1&keywords=vaccination+humphries .)

So Dr. Esienstein became convinced that a) there is no public health or other benefit to vaccinations leading him to recommend against them, and b) the result was NOT ONE CASE OF AUTISM IN HIS PRACTICE.

Maybe not proof, but a good start. We wondered if there is another group in America that isn’t routinely vaccinated that we could find autism numbers. And after doing some research, we found that in a large Amish community, no vaccinations, yet only one child was autistic – and that child had been vaccinated!

And now we find that the CDC knew… After the CDC whistleblower came forward, parents of autistic children camped out at the Congressman’s office in his district, asking the Congressman to at least hold hearings.. As that would have generated publicity. So far, no hearings …

When people tell me that vaccines do not cause Autism I say….”Vaccines don’t cause Autism….they cause demyelination, which eats the myelin sheath, paving the way for neurological damage to occur…and THAT causes Autism!”

“Basically what happens is that as a neuron matures, one of the projections coming off the cell body grows in a linear fashion and eventually hooks up with another neuron. The long projection that joins them together is called axon.

The axon is insulated and protected by the myelin sheath, which increases the efficacy of the electrical impulse that travels from the pre-synaptic neuron to the post-synaptic neuron.

When something goes wrong with this process, neurons do not communicate with each other. When this happens in multiple areas of the brain, as happens with diffuse damage from toxic exposure, on of the effects is “processing disorders”.

Information is not being “processed” because the neutrons either cannot communicate with each other, or are not communicating effectively.”

Please contact Robert Kennedy and attempt to speed up the process of stopping the mandatory vaccines. Help Robert put an end to the greedy CDC FDA Big Pharmas Drs. etc. I thank God for people like you every day.