Ballots to remain uncounted in MI and Stein blocked in Philly. Guest: Election integrity, law expert Paul Lehto says this proves 'only option is to get it right on Election Night'. Also: Trump taps climate denier, fossil-fuel tool for EPA...

There are two important late Friday announcements from the newly revived, post-Bush Voting Unit at U.S. Dept. of Justice's Civil Rights Division this afternoon. In both cases, they've raised serious concerns about discrimination by Republican Presidential front-runner Rick Perry's Texas against Hispanic and African-American voters.

Given the Lone Star State's history of discrimination against racial minorities, new laws and regulations which relate to elections and voting must be pre-cleared by the Dept. of Justice before they can be put into effect, as per Section 5 of the federal Voting Rights Act.

In one finding, the DoJ sees purposeful discrimination against minorities in the state's redistricting plans [PDF] for apportioning both new statehouse districts, as well as four new U.S. House seats being added in the wake of the 2010 census. The new seats are being added due to an increase in the TX population, thanks in no small part, ironically enough, to huge growth in the state's Hispanic population. The DoJ finds the proposed statehouse plan violates Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, stating that it "was adopted, at least in part, for the purpose of diminishing the ability of citizens of the United States, on account of race, color, or membership in a language minority group, to elect their preferred candidates of choice to the Texas House of Representatives."

The TX plan for the U.S. House didn't fare much better (see below), with similar findings that minorities are likely to see a "retrogressive effect" in their ability "to elect their preferred candidates of choice to the United States House of Representatives" under Perry's approved scheme.

Moreover, in a letter that echoes questions recently sent by the DoJ to the state of South Carolina about their new polling place Photo ID restrictions, as The BRAD BLOG detailed earlier this month, the DoJ has a series of questions concerning Texas' new, very similar restrictions. As the law mirrors the one in South Carolina --- and in many of the other states where the GOP has been able to ram through similar voter suppression bills over the past year --- many of the questions from the DoJ to TX also ask about the their plans for notification about the law, and issuance of free IDs to the more than 600,000 otherwise-legally qualified voters who don't currently own state-issued ID that would meet the strict new requirements to cast a vote at the polls on Election Day.

In TX, the DoJ voting unit is curious about how many of those residents who don't have such IDs also happen to have Spanish surnames...

The Justice Department said late Friday that based on their preliminary investigation, a congressional redistricting map signed into law by Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry appears to have been "adopted, at least in part, for the purpose of diminishing the ability of citizens of the United States, on account of race, color, or membership in a language minority group, to elect their preferred candidates of choice to Congress."
...
[T]he federal agency came out...against the state House of Representatives plan, which they flat out said "violates Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act in that it was adopted, at least in part, for the purpose of diminishing the ability of citizens of the United States, on account of race, color, or membership in a language minority group, to elect their preferred candidates of choice to the Texas House of Representatives."
...
[In addition to finding a retrogressive effect in statehouse districts, the DoJ also found the same problem in the way U.S. House districts are to be apportioned under Perry's plan.]

"When compared to the existing plan, the proposed Congressional plan will have a retrogressive effect in that it will diminish the ability of citizens of the United States, on account of race, color or membership in a language minority group, to elect their preferred candidates of choice to the United States House of Representatives," the Justice Department said in a filing.

In a Friday letter officials wrote that they need to know more about how the state would alert voters to the changes to the law.

Federal officials also want a detailed description of when and where the state will make free identification certificates available, as well as specifics on how they will educate the public about when such certificates will be available.

Texas officials said that 605,576 residents do not have a Texas drivers license or photo ID card. DOJ wants to know how many of those residents without IDs have Spanish surnames.

Earlier this month, a coalition of state and national voting and civil rights groups asked the DoJ to deny pre-clearance for the TX law, charging, as TPM notes, "that it was unnecessary, unfair, restrictive and intentionally discriminates against African-American and Latino voters."

Texas now has 60 days to respond to the DoJ's questions about the law which, like South Carolina's, may not end up receiving pre-clearance by the federal agency.

Earlier today our own Ernie Canning offered a sharp analysis of a recent U.S. Senate hearing which examined the discriminatory effects of GOP-instituted polling place Photo ID restrictions in other Southern states. In one section, he highlighted comments by Rep. Charles Gonzales (D-TX) who noted that, in order to help ram through the new Photo ID law, Perry declared "a legislative emergency, calling it necessary to combat rampant voter fraud," even as the Texas Attorney General, in a 2006 announcement, was unable to identify "a single case of fraud that would have been stopped" by the law now passed by Republicans in the state.

Brad: While I didn't include it in the Senate Subcommittee hearing piece because of space considerations, there are portions of the testimony of attorney Judith Browne Dianis that are directly relevant to this piece.

She testified:

In TX approximately 500,000 Latinos and Blacks live in counties without ready access to Department of Public Safety offices in their county. 80 counties have no office or closed it altogether. In TN only a third of the counties have DMV offices, and those in urban areas serving predominantly people of color, have wait times up to four hours.

Ms. Dianis also quoted the Republican Sec. of State of Ohio, John Husted:

I believe that if you have a government issued check, a utility bill in your name with your address on it, that no one made that up. They didn’t establish utilities in their name to commit voter fraud. Let’s be clear about this. There are some other forms that are legitimate. What if I lose my ID on Election Day? Should there be no other alternative I can use to cast my ballot? I think there should be.

Rushpubliscums like Guv Goodhair have made their entire careers on suppressing minorities. The only way they can keep power is to find some way to bar all but the Klanservative Klanbagging Kooks from the polls. This "Voter ID" suppression is the poll tax of the new era, and it's going to work, unless it is stopped.

Somewhat off topic: I would love to work as an official election worker but since I am not registered in either major party, I will not be hired. Lots of mistakes are made b/c the election workers don't know the law. There are also games played in the board of elections office with personnel by both parties participating. And this in a pretty "honest" county.