Local startup UrBike, as well as bike-share companies Spin and LimeBike, are clamoring to set up shop, but the city needs to shape their operations in a way that enhances the transportation system.

Three private bike-share companies are knocking on Denver’s door, but the city isn’t quite ready to let them in — not before there’s a clearer understanding of where the bikes will be stored, and how private bike-share will help the city achieve its broader goals.

In contrast to B-cycle, which supplies bikes via fixed stations where users begin and end their trips, these new services are “dockless.” Each bike has GPS and a lock controlled by a smart phone app, which lets riders use bikes without being tethered to a station. It’s more flexible than station-based bike-share, but presents other challenges.

UrBike, a Denver startup, has asked the city for permission to operate. So have Spin and LimeBike, two companies that are also active in Seattle. First, Denver Public Works wants to set some ground rules.

“We’re very interested in the concept because obviously we’re in favor of things that make biking and walking easier and affordable,” said Cindy Patton, acting parking and mobility manager with DPW. “But there’s right-of-way implications and certainly obstruction of walkways and [Americans With Disability Act] access… that can happen if too many bikes pile up and aren’t parked in a reasonable manner.”

UrBike wants to deploy a system of 5,000 bikes throughout the Denver area. That could significantly expand access to bike-share in Denver. B-Cycle has 737 bikes, and doesn’t reach much of the city. No stations exist north of River North, east of Colorado Boulevard or south of Wash Park, and the west side is lacking.

“I think the most important thing for us is, as the fundamentals of bike-sharing changes with technology, a rising tide floats all boats,” said B-cycle Executive Director Nick Bohnenkamp. As the “incumbent,” Bohnenkamp said he wants to see any new companies “build on the goodwill we’ve created.” B-cycle will upgrade its bike tech eventually, too, he said.

UrBike is looking at operating on college campuses, said Mike Pletch, the company’s Colorado general manager, but wants to provide a service for the general public as well.

He has met with B-Cycle and said he wants to work with the city’s established bike-share service in some capacity.

B-Cycle is an independent non-profit, not a city program, but Denver gave the company seed funding and continues to contribute $250,000 a year. Director of Transportation and Mobility Chrissy Fanganello sits on the board.

The city probably won’t replicate that type of relationship with the new companies, but it’s looking to leverage their interest in a way that advances public goals. For example, the city could require the companies to maintain a certain amount of bikes in low-income neighborhoods, Patton said.

Fanganello sent a letter to the new bike-share companies asking them to slow their roll while the city explores a regulatory framework.

“We need to decide internally whether it’s going to be a kind of free market operation where you have a number of different companies operating, or we go with one sole provider, or we don’t do it at all,” Patton said. “All of those things are possibilities.”

Surprised me that VC’s are interested; they’re always looking for the next disruptive technology or business though.

First thought was the convenience of DUS Neighborhood residents (for example) using these to shop at Whole Foods or King Soopers. Next thought was maybe “dockless wagons” would be even better. I see where Amazon has them for $140 if bought individually. Anybody want to start a new business venture? VC’s are lurking.https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/91Vf6WHpVfL._SX355_.jpg

Storage? Why would you put them away at all? We need more bikes available at 2am, not fewer.

You can already rent electric bikes in Denver, from companies which are operating safely without regulatory interference. Just because these bikes would be more prolific is no reason to discriminate. If somebody parks it in a bad place the bike can be moved & the provider can send them a ticket.

B-Cycle isn’t *terrible*, but it’s not great, & it mostly serves upscale high-rent neighborhoods. There are zero B-Cycle racks in my area & I’m only a few minutes ride from downtown; That’s ridiculous.

Traffic Deaths Fell Slightly Nationally, But Increased in Colorado (DenPo) New Blueprint for City Growth and Transportation Won’t Pretend Neighborhoods Are Static (DenPo) Density Near Transit Means More Places for People to Live and Work (ABC7) Trump’s Infrastructure Plan a “Trojan Horse” to Cripple Environmental Oversight (KGNU) Driver Kills Michael Miller in the Springs, Faces […]

South Pearl Neighbors See Apartments as “Threat” to Parking; Zoning Could Require Ground-Floor Uses (Denverite) Planed Tower at 17th and California to Induce Traffic With 780 Parking Stalls (DenPo) Parking Lot Becomes 49 Homes for People Without Housing (Fox31) City Hiring Staff to Marshal Bond-Funded Projects (DenPo) Plan for A Line Delays Next Weekend as […]

The auto industry probably loves Colorado’s enthusiastic embrace of automated vehicles. But if decision-makers bet on robo-cars as a transportation panacea, to the exclusion of proven urban transportation solutions, they risk repeating past mistakes that hollowed out urban centers and deepened our dependence on cars. We can make our city streets safer and more efficient today […]