LET'S PAUSE A MOMENT to consider a simple query: Name one thing that has
improved since "experts" took over.

How about public education? Until the 1960s, we didn't have hoards of
school administrators, consultants and educational research spending.
However, in those days, kids who graduated from high school had a much
higher achievement level than today. There's one estimate that a 1947 high
school diploma was equivalent to today's college degree.

Before experts like Dr. Spock told us not to spank kids, kids didn't curse,
shoot and rape teachers or fellow students. Schools didn't have to have
security apparatus to guard against guns and knives or policemen patrolling
the corridors. In the face of this educational expert-driven disaster, we're
spending multiples of what was spent in yesteryear. Adding insult to injury,
the experts want more money.

While we're on education, what about sex education? Experts demeaned
parental old-fogey approaches to sex education, claiming they could do a
better job. After allowing experts to handle sex education, teen promiscuity
is pervasive, and we have record rates of teen pregnancy and sexually
transmitted diseases.

The experts also gave us their ideas about crime. They said criminals were
really victims of poverty, discrimination and broken homes. Instead of
punishing these "victims" with incarceration and execution, like we did in
yesteryear, they told us that rehabilitation, group counseling, probation
and parole made more sense. After we bought this nonsense, every category of
crime skyrocketed.

Only recently have we seen a slight reversal of this trend. It's not
because of experts. We've recovered some of our senses and built more
prisons, incarcerated more criminals and reinstated the death penalty.

Speaking of prisons, we might also ask: When were prisons more orderly? Was
it at a time when wardens rose from the ranks of prison guards? Or was it
when we started hiring psychobabblers with master's degrees in social work
as wardens to try out their theories of how criminals should be handled? As
a result of hare-brained theories, there have been more prison riots and
more guards and prisoners assaulted and murdered. Prison rape and sodomy are
rife. What's the experts' response? At some prisons, condoms are issued to
inmates as a means to fight the spread of venereal disease.

How about experts and welfare? Back in the '40s and '50s, welfare could not
become a way of life. Welfare workers monitored recipients. Recipients could
not have "luxuries" such as a telephone, television, car and vacations.
After all, the reasoning was that if you could afford those things, you
didn't belong on welfare. Welfare workers made unannounced home visits to
monitor recipient behavior and to prevent cheating.

Experts said all of this was unfair. They said that people had a right to
welfare and to have children they couldn't afford and that to be on welfare
was nothing to be ashamed about. Experts like Johns Hopkins sociologist
Andrew Cherlin told us, "It has yet to be shown that the absence of a father
was directly responsible for any of the supposed deficiencies of broken
homes." The real issue, Cherlin said, "is not the lack of male presence but
the lack of male income." That's the same as saying a father and husband can
be replaced by a welfare check, and we bought that nonsense.

Experts and the educated elite have delivered one social disaster after
another. Experts replaced what worked with what sounded good. Society was
far more civilized before they took over our schools, prisons, welfare
programs, police departments and courts. It's high time we ran these people
out of our lives and went back to common
sense. B>