I'd suggest you ask yourself if your last used/standard version of your resume supports what your cover letter emphasizes for this opportunity. That may mean tweaking some content so that the reader can easily find what you want them to focus on in your resume.

The day of an actual person reading over many resumes is over. As many companies rely on software to pull out the strategic words and phrases, in order to have you considered further or not, you have to get past the computer. So if you do not tailor each resume to the job, then you likely will lose an opportunity to even be interviewed. Many companies are not even reviewing cover letters, so if it is not in the resume, it is not considered. This does not mean you should change your skills to things you have not done, but you do need to consider how the prospective employer is wording the skill sets they are looking for.

For my resume, I include a functional listing of highlights on the first page of my resume, that I can amend to more closely fit the wording of the prospective employer's needs. I then follow that with the chronological work history. That way, I do not change the work history each time, but I am emphasizing the key words and phrases so that my resume will actually land on a real person's desk. In this digital age, a computer is likely pulling my credentials for further consideration, or leaving me by the wayside; I use every opportunity I can to get further consideration.

If you are playing the largely ineffective posted position game, then by default you are trying to be all things to all people and may necessitate constantly changing your resume. There are a couple of challenges with doing so.

- you aren't well-positioned from your strengths
- you can't really tell what is working and what isn't on your resume because you are constantly changing it
- constant changes to a resume increase the chances of errors

During my search I created a resume version for each of the role/industry to which I was typically applied (I had 4 versions). This helped me be more specific for each role and the upfront work paid off in lower admin time in adjusting my resume to fit an open role.

Before you hit submit, put yourself in the role of two people and write down 2-3 items they will be specifically looking for in the resume.

1) Screening HR person - matching qualifications against role requirements, they will be using their ATS (keywords, titles, etc.) as their initial screening.

2) Hiring Manager - finding people who offer best promise to deliver. What are both immediate and near-term issues within the company (e.g. recent series of acquisitions, lower than expected performance, etc.).

I did a quick check on my resume to either add new bullets to emphasize an experience (e.g. working through low profitability), rearrange bullet points (e.g. move up revenue generation support), or add specific terms. I also looked for recurring terms in their job description - if appropriate I would include those as well.

This may sounds like a parlor trick, but it's just making it easier for them to translate your experience and make you stand out from the pile.

For example, I had a CFO for SaaS firm version, there are specific areas that are important to any SaaS firm - so was easy to update to meet an opportunity and provide specific experiences.

I say yes, tailor the resume to fit the job description. It is relatively easy to do, especially for a functional resume. You can thus highlight how you meet the specific requirements. In the old, pre-word processor days, we would have a print shop print 100 - 200 resumes (all the same of course), and type a cover letter on similar paper.

I could see making some minor changes if it highlights areas that address an identified need but it should not be massive rewrites. If that is necessary, it would seem that the resume was too granular to start with.

I agree with the risk in having too many versions of your resume out there. However, there is merit to adjusting your summary to include any key words or skills that you have and are important to the hiring company. For example, you may take SOX key controls for granted, but, if emphasized in the posting, might be worth including; you might include SAP experience if there is a looming project in the new role.

My experience suggests that a strong introductory reference supplemented with a cover letter highlighting skills and background that match the opportunity is the most effective approach. The cover letter can emphasize skills and background that match the company's needs. The hiring company will likely immediately review your LinkedIn site and do other independent research. This approach will allow the resume to remain consistent with the information that is publicly available while still demonstrating your interest and the ways you can add value to the hiring company.

Business Exchange

Contribute to Community

If you’re interested in learning more about contributing to your Proformative community, we have many ways for you to get involved. Please email content@proformative.com to learn more about becoming a speaker or contributing to the blogs/Q&A Forum.