When Two Murderously Guilty Men Mysteriously Become ‘Not Guilty’
November 4, 1986, the Santa Cruz SENTINEL reports Corine Anne Christensen, 34,
is found dead of a point-blank inflicted .38 caliber gunshot wound just beside
her left nostril. This discovery occurs 36 hours after James Marino and Richard
Wayne Bandler (and no others) were in her Live Oak residence, bitterly arguing
and snorting a lot of cocaine. Marino will later testify that Bandler introduced
him to and trained him for a large quantity of cocaine dealing and trafficking,
encompassing national distribution, via commercial air traffic accessed, trans
continental clientele and ‘innerCircle connections’.

Future newspaper reports and trial testimony reveal that Ms. Christensen was
Bandler’s bookkeeper as well as prostitute for hire, to Bandler’s much
controversied, protectively concealed ‘V.I.P. innerCircle’, and that Ms.
Christensen rationed Richard Bandler’s personal ingestion of cocaine to “one
ounce per week”.

Departing Ms. Christensen’s home, the two men drove to the end of the Capitola
wharf, where Marino says he complied with Bandler’s order to throw the weapon
into the ocean from the pier. The two men then parted each other’s company
(Sheriff’s divers later recover the weapon, exactly where Marino described it
to be).................

A day and a half later, James Marino went to his lawyer, Kate Wells, and
reported the above, telling her he ‘hopes it’s a dream’. Marino’s lawyer
sends her (at that time) husband to Ms. Christensen’s house, whereupon he
returns from the scene to inform Mr. Marino that his report was not a
‘dream’. The police are called in at this time. Bandler will later testify
that he spent his day and a half in bed, snorting a lot of cocaine with one of
his two girlfriends. When asked why he didn’t report the crime, he replied
that he “intended to do so”, after he’d “cleared his head.”

Marino says Bandler shot her. Bandler says Marino shot her. Each man says he
witnessed the murder, and both affirm that there are no other suspects.
Officials determine post facto that, in the 36 hour interval between the murder
of Ms. Christensen and the police reportage of that fact, the victim’s entire
domicile had been elaborately ransacked; in what was clearly a thorough search
of her home and all of its contents. Including a ripped open teddy bear and the
care-free dishevelment of her personal effects. Testimony and reports from and
among Bandler ‘associates’, revealed wide knowledge that Ms. Christensen
routinely sequestered large amounts of book-keeping data, cash and cocaine, in
an office safe in her house. All of this material was disappeared; without
explanation...
.....................

Another motive for the desperate and thorough search, was a need to dispose of
highly classified and incriminating information that Ms. Christensen recorded on
her computer; with corroborating discs and audio tapes, which had - along with
large amounts of cash - been stolen from her home, in the 36 hour period of
non-reportage.

Ms. Christensen was described at trial as having been a ‘high class
prostitute’; having many sordid relationships with ‘a lot of important
people’. Abundant testimony reveals that numerous persons fully aware that Ms.
Chrisenen not only kept Bandler’s nuerolinguistic programming (N.L.P.)
industry’s financial accounts, receipts, etc.’ she was also known to keep
notes and audio tapes on and about her ‘clientele’. These included large
quantity cocaine buyers, as well as prostitutional ‘Johns’.

It is also revealed that Ms. Christensen and James Marino each, routinely
‘bugged’ the other’s residence; including bedrooms, by ‘wireless
microphone’ installations. Thereby obtaining ‘classified’ recordings of
each other. Much of the friction in Ms. Christensen’s relationship with
Bandler and Marino had to do therefore, not so much with sex or drugs, but
rather more importantly with informational intelligence about a large number of
significant persons and criminal activities.

Neither the court testimonials or the press spared Ms. Christensen or her family
and friends details, such as how many dildos (female sex toys) she owned, and
how many male as well as female clients she may have used them on. The jury and
press learn that she sometimes serviced as many as seven clients daily
(‘dominatrix’, ‘insatiable sexual appetite’, ‘lesbian’,
‘bi-sexual’). This lurid and personal information served as killer
deathspeak relish in diminising her perceived value and increasing her perceived
expendability. Having already admitted that he never stopped being one of her
‘many lovers’ for the past several years, Marino did not abstain from
posthumously calling her a ‘kinky sicko’. None of these derisive, posthumous
descriptions of the victim were objected to, halted, or stricken from the
record...
...........................

November 6 1986. The Santa Cruz SENTINEL reports that Richard Bandler is
singularly accused as the only suspect. Marino is not charged with anything at
all and granted immunity against drug charges, ‘in exchange for his
testimony’, opposing ‘the only suspect’ - Mr. Bandler. County District
Attorney assigned prosecutor, Gary Fry, is new in Santa Cruz, to jockey the
first and only murder trial of his career at that time (He is now a federal
prosecutor). In contrast, Bandler’s defense attorney, Gerald Scheartzbach, is
a seasoned and highly skilled defense attorney.

LAWYERS, GUNS & MONEY, continued
December 21 1986. San Jose MERCURY News, WEST Magazine article, written by the
Santa Cruz SENTINEL’s Tom Long: “Bail Is Reduced For Slaying Suspect:
Saying that he had been presented with the most impressive letters of reference
he had seen in his career, Municipal Court Judge Richard Kessel reduced the
amount of bail for murder suspect and psychotherapist Richard Bandler, from
$500,000.00 to $100,000.00 Friday afternoon. Kessel made his decision in a
courtroom crowded with Bandler’s supporters. To augment his appeal (for lower
bail), Schwartzbach (Bandler’s defense attorney) had delivered to the judge a
thick stack of reference letters from (unnamed, incognito veiled) sources
including doctors, a member of Army Intelligence, Vietnam veterans, Sheriff’s
deputies and others. “I fully expect that he will be out next week.”,
Schwartzbach optimistically concluded.

The SENTINEL will cover this case for 15 months, from November 1986 to January
1988, when Bandler is found ‘not guilty’. In this time period, four judges
will preside over and handle the case, beginning with preliminary trial Judge
Tom Kelly, then Judges Marlo and Kessel; finally with Judge Cottle presiding
over the jury trial.
...................................

On April 22 1987, the SENTINEL quotes Judge Tom Kelly twice, saying: “THE
ONLY THING I KNOW BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT IS THAT THE MURDERER (defendant
Bandler or witness Marino) WAS HERE IN THIS COURTROOM.” This Kelly quote
is repeated in bold print as a by-line heading, and then again in lower case
typeface. November 3, 1987, the SENTINEL, in subjecting James Marino, dubiously
pronounces him “the key witness for the defense and the prosecution”. (The
pinnacle of duplicity.)

May 8 1987, the SENTINEL reports Kelly, repeating his unsurety of ‘who the
murderer is’ (in consideration of defendant Bandler, or witness, Marino). Note
that Marino is not called a ‘suspect’, while at the same time he is openly
perceived and boldly alluded to as such; by many persons. Certainly including
Judge Tom Kelly: who drives this schizoid point home from the beginning of the
preliminary trial hearings, through the middle and to the very bitter end of
this case and its accompanying trial and controversy. Judge Kelly adds
grotesquely: “The evidence is flimsey in this (preliminary trial
hearing) case, but enough to order Bandler to stand trial.”

Two and a half weeks later, on 27 May ‘87, the SENTINEL quotes Judge Tom Kelly
again, saying: “THE ONLY THING I KNOW BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT IS THAT
THE MURDERER WAS IN THIS COURTROOM.” Taking this renewed opportunity
to reiterate his redundancy, Judge Kelly does not fail to once again, amazingly
proclaim as ‘flimsey’, the case against Bandler - ‘the only suspect’.

Note, that preliminary trial Judge Kelly dwells upon and repeatedly belabors
the consistent usage of the singular, in always referring to ‘the guilty
man’, and, ‘the murderer’, while copiously lamenting his indecision about
whether ‘the defendant’, or ‘the key witness for the prosecution and the
defense’, is the toasting answer to the fired up question of who did it. Of
course, THE YET UNSELECTED JURY IS ROUTINELY READING THIS, from the local
press; at breakfast, lunch and dinner.

COFFEE, TEA & N.L.P. Continued
Judge Kelly will continue to be SENTINEL documented, expressing his interminably
elongated dilemma about whether the guilty man is Richard Bandler, or James
Marino. The former is on trial. The latter is uncharged. (The crown and vertex
of intrigue saturated, duplicitous Orwellean DoubleTalk and NewSpeak.)

On the other hand, the only immunity Marino has been (very peculiarly and
impertinently) granted, is against any drug charges that might otherwise result
from his (‘star witness’) testimony.

The plurally suspect defendants are reduced to a singular. The unabashed
testimony and confirmation from both Bandler and Marino, about their very large
cocaine and cash dealings with very important and exotic (ever anonymous)
people, is heedlessly flaunted with reckless abandon, throughout the intrigue
and duplicity saturated trial.

July 30 1987. The SENTINEL: “Papers Missing In Bandler Case”. A judge
must determine what to do this morning, about original court documents missing
from the court file, in the Richard Bandler (‘psychoProgramming’) murder
case. Seven volumes of transcripts are missing from the official court file (One
daily, for the first seven days of the preliminary trial) from the preliminary
hearing for Bandler, a noted nuerolinguistic programming pioneer, charged with
killing a Capitola prostitute (not ‘murdering a woman’, or ‘bookkeeper
for the locally active, rogue C.I.A. cocaine traffickers’, or ‘person who
knew too much about too many very important and ponderous - ever anonymous -
people’). Bandler’s (jury) trial is set for November 2nd (‘87), in
Superior Court.

“Kenni Lopez, who supervises the clerks in the Superior Court Clerk’s
office, says an office wide search has failed to turn up the transcripts. This
is the first time, she said, that such a document has been missing. She and
County Clerk Richard Bedal fear the papers may have been deliberately taken from
the file. Removal of such documents they say, is a felony.”

July 31 1987. The SENTINEL: “Bandler Judge Wants A Copy Made Of Missing
Papers. A judge ordered a copy be made of the District Attorney’s
transcript of Richard Bandler’s preliminary trial hearing, to serve as the
official court document in the murder case. The knotty problem came to court
Thursday morning, because the official seven volumes of the preliminary hearing
are missing from the court record. They were removed (later reports will cite a
non-descript elderly woman as having ‘walked out’ with the supposedly
guarded, unreplaceable original papers) from the file in the Superior Court
Clerk’s Office, shortly after they were transcribed by the court reporter,
earlier this month. Judge John Marlo (makes the 3rd judge acting in this case)
ruled Thursday, that the new (District Attorney’s) copy will serve as the
official transcript (in place of the official court transcript; apparently
against which no comparison is available or can be made)”.

THE NAUGHTY PROBLEM, continued
The above article leaves it to the reader’s wherewithal and/or imagination to
fathom the difference between the missing (stolen) transcripts, and the
replacement record’s from the District Attorney’s (Arthur Danner’s)
Office. No comparative explanation is offered, leaving the unanswered question:
exactly how are missing, original court transcribed documents, replaced with
records from the D.A.’s office? To ‘serve as the official transcript’ -
which it patently is not.

November 8 1987. San Jose MERCURY News, WEST Magazine:
“MIND OVER MURDER”, by Kathy Holub (excerpts follow):
“He (Bandler) started working with the U.S. Army and the Central Intelligence
Agency, doing projects on post Vietnam stress syndrome (P.T.S.D. - post
traumatic stress disorder. Certainly not confined to Vietnam veterans, or the
military experience, or this century or millennium, for that matter. It’s a
newly acknowledged science, less than twenty years old <at the time of this
1997 writing>; of evaluating and measuring ongoing mental disorders
originally imparted by severe psychological and/or physical trauma), and
marksmanship (especially with handguns - Bandler owns eleven pistols). Kathy
Holub’s prophetically self-fulfilling, neurolinguistically programming title -
MIND OVER MURDER - continues:

“He did some highly sensitive work for the C.I.A. on training potential
hostages to withstand torture and interrogation.

“Kate Wells, a local (*formerly Bandler’s) attorney (*the newspapers never
say that), remembers sitting in his (Bandler’s) apartment one day, ‘With the
three top C.I.A. agents in the country (Neither Wells or the Mercury News
article provides their names). They were like this with Richard. She
(Wells) makes a goggling face. ‘They were in awe of him. They would have done
anything to please him. Sitting in his cruddy little living room in Capitola. It
was surreal’”.

Kathy Holub’s MIND OVER MURDER, also offers that Corine Christensen ‘had one
source of legal income - bookkeeping for Bandler and NLP (nuerolinguistic
programming - the much over-rated, scientifically disclaimed industry Bandler
was profitably pioneering. It doesn’t say Christensen was a ‘bookkeeper for
the locally active rogue C.I.A. cocaine traffickers’, here).”

It is repeated many times and in slightly varying phraseology, in an assortment
of newspaper articles on this case, that the murder was motivated by drugs and
sexual tensions, having nothing to do with Bandler’s work in N.L.P., Army
Intelligence or the C.I.A. chiefs he was hob-nobbing with in his home (a few
houses down from the murder scene): as though the murder was unrelated to Ms.
Christensen’s prostitutional relationship with who knows how many persons of
what social station (the paramount issue of the identities of the often touted
‘important people’ is never pursued in this case).
Kathy Holub continues in MIND OVER MURDER - “Bandler and Christensen were
freinds , not lovers. But Bandler often hired her to have sex with his
friends.”

More of Judge Tom Kelly’s iniquitous quotes emerge newsworthy (The key
to nuerolinguistic brainwashing is repetition; especially by recognised
authority, such as Judge Kelly, and large, massively distributing news agencies,
continued).
San Jose MERCURY News WEST Magazine, 8 November 1987 (Excerpts follow):
“My mind went back and forth all week,” he (Judge shuttle-brain) said, about
which man was guilty.” He would order the case to (jury) trial he said, but so
far the evidence seemed *‘skimpy’ (for the third time; the first two times
Kelly used the word *‘flimsey’). Judge Kelly goes on to publicly state, yet
once again, also for the third time: “THE ONLY THING I KNOW FOR SURE BEYOND
A REASONABLE DOUBT, IS WE HAD A MURDERER IN THIS COURT ROOM THE LAST WEEK AND A
HALF. BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT I CANNOT TELL YOU WHO THAT PERSON WAS.”

Always the uniformly militant, repetitiously exercised usage of the singular, in
ascribing to one man, the compound responsibility for the ‘skimpily
evidenced’, marginally important murder of Capitola prostitute, Corine
‘Kinky Sicko’ Christensen. This makes three different publicized reports
from Judge Kelly, saying thrice, the same dualistically shifty things about the
two men at the murder scene.

The disappearance of large amounts of cocaine and cash, as well as evidence
critical to the case and highly classified information from Christensen’s
pillage-ravaged home - what, and who, this case is really all about - is
minimally issued, un- pursued by the court and the newspapers.
.....................

Two weeks later, 27 November 1987, SENTINEL reporter, Mark Bergstrom, yet again,
for the fourth time, quotes Judge Kelly with exactly the same quotes as above.
Bergstrom artistically volunteers furthermore:
“Beneath all the trappings of N.L.P., cocaine and sex are the real crux of the
case. It’s a WHODUNIT.”
‘All the trappings of N.L.P.’ is Army Intelligence and the rogue Central
Intelligence Agency, which Mr. Bergstrom makes perfectly clear, have nothing to
do with ‘the real crux of the case’; which Bergstrom crystally clears to be
cocaine and sex. ‘Not having to do’ with grievously incriminating
information, involving scores, perhaps hundreds of ‘very important innerCircle
people’: distributing and receiving large amounts of feloniously obtained cash
and cocaine, by nationally commuting commercial air traffic. No indeed. It is a
publicly inventoried dildo guilded, bi-sexual dominitrixing, seven daily
tricking, kinky sicko, sex and drugs propelled (rock and rollex) WHODUNIT. For
absolutely surex.

Hierarchical Death From Above
Whereas, the alleged ‘WHODUNIT’ proves out to be is a how many
dunit; for what many reasons, of Ms. Christensen’s direct knowledge,
documentation and forensic proof of the insidious and unnamed elements orbiting
this case and it’s ominously minimized and ignored magnitude. Certainly
exhibiting N.L.P. repetition tactics from Judge Kelly and others, by way of the
vehicularized media reportage. Especially by the ever pliant and actively
complicit SENTINEL, with stand-in freelancers, similarly unleashed in the San
Jose MERCURY News. All a matter of ineradicable record, precisely reflected in
this somewhat narratively styled, purely documentary anthology.

Only-lines-on-paper, finding ‘Chief Prosecutor’ Arthur Danner’s highly
reputed fortress of impregnability laid to its own self destructive waste, in
fact, for at least the past ten years it is now. It would all be B.S. and/or
obsessive and meager opinion, were it not the recorded newspaper history and
court minutes of the rogue C.I.A. infested Bandler Marino case: ‘prosecuted’
by Santa Cruz County’s District Attorney’s office, via Gary Fry - a district
attorney Art Danner-summoned new arrival in town (now a federal judge), handling
his first murder case. Between 4 November 1986 and 29 January 1988.

“NUEROLINGUISTIC GURU PERFORMS ACT OF GENIUS AT SEMINAR”
Newspaper articles throughout this trial reflect a long history of Bandler’s
carrying concealed firearms, brandishing and pulling them on people - especially
women - accompanied by threats, and imposing the muzzle in, or near, their
face(s). On one particular occasion, he did this under the witnessship of
hundreds of people attending one of his early ‘80’s N.L.P. seminars. Bandler
would later explain that it had to do with a finer point of his N.L.P.
‘persuasive tactics’. His supporters (and Bandler sports a revealing
abundance of them) called this diabolically cheap shot, ‘an act of genius’.

TEA & BULLETS
( If 6 Was 9: Cleans 2 The UltraShine )
The forensic ‘blowback’ of the victim’s blood and other tissue was,
according to Bandler, deposited - sprayed, ‘aerosol effected’ - on him,
because he was seated next to Ms. Christensen when Marino shot her. Marino
testified that blood and other tissue blowback was on Bandler, because he (Bandler)
shot her. Opposing forensic pathologist’s testimonies on behalf of the defense
and the prosecution are grid-locked in argument before the jury, on this
cross-eyed WHODUNIT, ‘blow-back’ tissue issue.Blowback Forensics & Kitchen Sink Sanitary Engineering, cont.
Even Judge - AC-DC - Kelly is sure Corine Christensen was shot in the face at
point blank range, between one half inch and five inches of distance from point
of impact. The only continuously burning, suspense packed question in this
skimpy-flimsey case is WHODUNIT. Each man testified that the other was at Ms.
SevenTrick’s kitchen sink, brilliantly improvising a MR. CLEAN plastic
detergent bottle as a silencer; and that the makeshift effort was abandoned and
therefore, not employed in the murder (execution).

The jury heard an audiotape of Richard Bandler arguing bitterly with Ms.
Sexually Insatiablesen, threatening to blow her brains out, in those words. The
audio tape evidence was bonafide to have been recorded four hours before the
defendant and the ‘star witness’ departed the house with the unimportantly
murdered, expertly testimonialised and thingified, lesbian sex and drug toy,
abandoned therein.
.........................

Whether Bandler and/or Marino marauderously scoured and sacked Ms.
Christensen’s house, or whether someone else did, is an unanswered - generally
unpursued - question, throughout this trial. Wherein, both the prosecution and
the defense display a minimum interest in this crucial matter of 36 hours worth
of time (the better part of the first weekend of November 1986): to go through
all of her domicile and belongings. Including her missing computer, bookkeeping
and clientele list for cocaine and sex purchases; as well as abundant personal
notes, along with many very personal audiotapes of unnamed, numberless persons.
On the other hand, the jury does learn of - is closely updated on - her
priortized sex toy inventory, and how many ever-anonymous persons she serviced,
daily. Yes. Her heinous murder was further extended, in court, even after she
was terminated. This shrewdly offered informational necromancy was not (even)
stricken from the hydrophobically foaming record. Extended, for the mesmerized
jury’s, stoically stunned ‘evaluation’.

DIVING INTO THE (Invisible ‘What?’)SEETHING WRECK, continued:
The cocaine and sexual activities were not anywhere near as crucial to her
murder as was the factor of information - Who, What, Where, Why and How... All
poignantly disappeared at the taking of Ms. Christensen’s young, ostensibly
misguided life. Corine Ann Christensen, the bookkeeper, neighbor and rent-out -
completely expendable, ‘pest like’ - party girl, for Richard Bandler’s awe
inspired, V.I.P. friends. Vanguard’s of Bandler’s nuerolinguistic
programming enterprises. An untitled, localised, precedent setting C.I.A. PsyWar
program. (Not pogrom?)

POST GRADUATE CRAZY-MAKING AT THE INSANITY FACTORY
N.L.P. The opportunistically advantageous, alternating art of not taking
‘no’, ‘yes’, or reality, for an answer. Persuading others to practice
this Orwellean s’kill on others, and for those converts to likewise persuade
others, and so on... Refer stonewalling, satanism, and the ‘war of
perception’ - Nazi science. Bastardized B.F. Skinnerism slowly turning on a
spit, over flaming copies of FARENHEIT 451, and the best works of Pavlov, Freud,
Adler and Jung. Richard Bandler’s C.I.A. spearhead of destructive behavior
modification and operant conditioning experiments on the public. In this
particular case, on all the newspaper reading public in Santa Cruz county -
VooDoo psychotherapeutics. Perilously Yellow Journalism, out of the (Orwellean)
‘Ministries of Truth and Justice.’ .................

(Time magazine’s January 1st 1984 ‘Feature Article’ commented on George
Orwell’s 1984: “The author’s <Orwell’s> predictions are
ridiculous”. Incontrovertible proof that George Orwell was not only correct,
but that he himself underestimated how accurate he would prove to be.
<Orwell’s 1984 extinctifies books and accurate, unrevised history. Whereas,
Huxley’s BRAVE NEW WORLD extinctifies motivational reading interest.>
Speaking of TIME magazine’s 1 January 1984 feature article, calling Orwell’s
predictions ‘ridiculous’ - add this: TIME-LIFE publishers ‘independently
purchased’ and sat upon the Zapruder film - the hardest evidence in the JFK
assassination - for 13 years. Finally releasing it to the public, under the
Jimmy Carter administration, in 1976...) .................

The wary Santa Cruz SENTINEL is on guard, tirelessly expanding the parameters of
the public’s tolerance threshholds. In time, they’ll be ready for the O.J.
Simpsonization of the nation. Where reality will again, be diversionarily
omitted and otherwise disregarded - cited for lack of political correctness.
Where palpable culpability will again be omitted, disfigured and/or side-lined
for ‘lack of evidence’. Where, all that is wanted is an *honorable end to
the O.J.Simpson trial (*beginning with the Vietnam war).’ Where reality is a
television mesmerized nation of shell-shocked people who can’t access the
evidence for the murder of their own president, until the year 2027. (The N.L.P.
inspired, popularly circulated JIFFYFIX for this and all other major, ongoing
cover-ups is: ‘The people don’t want to know the truth’ <J.F.K shot
himself>.)

Corine Christensen? Richard Bandler & James Marino? Ho hum. What difference
does it make? The bitch deserved it. Rhubarb rhubarb. Chill out. Until the next
time. and the easier and more sleep inducing, channel-changing time after that.
Squared. (Refer, attention span contraction, and tolerance threshhold expansion,
a War Of Perception.) Just don’t complain too much (Shut up!), or the
cheap shooting C.I.A. tentacles may fire up - and/or drown you, or yours, also:
at high noon; in the public- official sanctioned and festivity normalised,
celebrity-surrounded, community swimming pool. Making damned sure your
submersibly buried, generously condemned and demonized body doesn’t
‘embarassingly’ surface, amidst any of the surrounding, elitist, formally
attired, aloof whine and cheeser party pleasers.
.........................
James Marino’s vaunted ‘immunity’ extends only to any drug charges that
might otherwise be applied to his testimony. The moment he admitted he disposed
of the murder weapon at Bandler’s instruction (knowing it was the murder
weapon) - in that moment, Marino became an accessory to and after the fact; as
guilty as Bandler, under the law. Upon this admission of disposal and
concealment, the mind manipulating, show stealing WHODUNIT question of ‘which
man pulled the trigger?’, is factually reduced to a mere technicality.
In accordance with presented testimony, argument and evidence, both men are
equally guilty. Equally convictable. Equally punishable under the law.
............................
Sunday, 17 January 1988. Santa Cruz SENTINEL. “In one of his many published
writings, Bandler said NLP can be applied to jury trials”.
The SENTINEL didn’t say NLP can be applied via its own exemplary newspaper
articles, readying the yet unselected jury - to be drawn from the
community that is massively pre-peppered with those repeatedly crazy-making
articles)... “Bandler testified last week that C.I.A. and other government
representatives once attended one of his NLP seminars in Washington, D.C.”
(Note the added, muted salute, in the parting allusion to more, subordinately
awe inspired, Wa. D.C.-based authority figures...)
........................
January 27 1988. Santa Cruz SENTINEL: “BANDLER NOT GUILTY.”
The defendant was found not guilty; by a jury which had been assembled months after
repeatedly reading of Judge Tom Kelly’s (and other’s) endemically advertised
quandary of ‘which (singular) man did it’.

IN YOUR FACE, continued:
January 29 1988. Santa Cruz SENTINEL: “Somebody has (not ‘two and more
people have’) just gotten away with murder. Only two other people were in the
room when a Capitola woman was shot to death in November of ‘86. One of them,
Richard Bandler, was acquitted of the charge late Thursday afternoon... “The
other, James Marino, was the prosecution’s (thank your lucky?) ‘star
witness’. (On 3 November, ‘87, the SENTINEL described Marino as ‘the star
witness for both the prosecution and the defense’ - and those are mighty
damned good odds.)

The 29 January, ‘88 SENTINEL continues: “The sad part for us is, there were
only two people there, and we couldn’t come up with anything for sure,” said
one of the jurors who acquitted Bandler of 1st degree murder after a two month
trial. The jury deliberated for less than six hours. “I found it very
difficult to believe Marino”, said a juror. “Others on the jury, he said,
“felt strongly that Bandler had pulled the trigger. But we had to follow the
rules, and there was reasonable doubt”, the juror said. He pointed out that
Judge Chris Cottle instructed them, that if there were two reasonable
explanations for events, the jury was bound to accept the one that pointed to
Bandlers *innocence (*sic. There is no ‘innocent man’ to protect, here.
This is how it was done. A new twist on the old axiom, ‘divide - superfluously
bifurcate, dichotomise - and conquer’. Attack the language/ communication
itself: unvarnished Orwellean QUACKSPEAK).

“Bandler took the witness stand during the trial and said that although he
had threatened to blow Christensen’s brains out just a few hours before the
killing (murder), it was Marino who pulled the trigger.”

Assistant D.A. Gary Fry said after the verdict, that he will not prosecute
Marino for the murder. “We can’t . We have to have evidence, and as much
speculation as people may have, we don’t have evidence against Mr. Marino,”
Fry said. (An enormously simulated beguilement. A flopper-whopping lie. “We
don’t have evidence against *Mr. Marino.” *Proved himself accessory to
the fact, in admitting he concealed the murder weapon, in throwing it off the
Capitola pier...)

Bandler was speechless after the verdict. it came so swiftly it caught everybody
by surprise...” “The quickness of the verdict spoke to the quality of the
prosecution’s (‘flimsey’) case”, said Schwartzbach (Bandler’s defense
attorney.) “The evidence showed he did not commit the crime.” (Lee Harvey
Oswald may have shot her from the 6th floor of the Texas Book depository?)
........................
Judge Tom Kelly’s function on over a half dozen occasions of SENTINEL
preliminary trial coverage, being read by the community from which the
forthcoming jury will be selected, is to always singularize ‘the suspect’;
to confine this 3-dimensional murder to 1 dimension. As though there are not two
- and more - suspects. As though there are not two and more accessories to
murder. As though there are not two - and more - guilty men. As though the press
and appointed jurisprudent representation, was not accessory to and after, the
murderously self-revealing fact(s).

LET’S GO THROUGH THE HOOD WINKING MOTIONS
(‘Let’s Pretend’), continued:
As though the District Attorney - County Chief Prosecutor - did not assign a
rookie prosecutor from out of town (later promoted to a federal prosecutor
status). As thouogh Marino was and remains immune to murder charges. As though
Marino did not prove himself guilty when he admitted disposing of the murder
weapon. Its recovery proving exactly where he said he concealed it. (“We
can’t prosecute Mr. Marino. We have only speculative evidence against him.”
- an NLP inspired, enormously bold and equally transparent lie.) As though it
was necessary to grant drug charge immunity to (‘make a deal’ with) Marino,
in exchange for his testimony.
.....................
As though the two - and more - men did not conspire to murder Christensen;
because, as Bandler’s N.L.P. bookkeeper and prostitute for hire to his
skulking, ever anonymous ‘friends’, she had not, as a deliberately
predestined ‘outsider’, become an increasingly perilous, innerCircle
perceived security risk. Having growing knowledge and hard, abundant evidence of
far too much incriminating and/or highly volatile, highly classified
information, about far too many insidious people, in (and out) of ‘the (richly
flaunted, awe inspiring, criminally fugitive) intelligence community’;
extending in and out of Bandler’s Live Oak-Capitola apartment, and the second
floor of the local, county, state and federal government building at 701 Ocean
Street, for example.

DRUGS CZAR U.S.
(It would all be B.S. if it wasn’t true, continued.)
The entire single defendant proceedings are a contrived and ruthless farce, from
the outset and continuingly. Duplicitous bifurcations, diversive brachiations
and dichotomisations (infinitive issue splitting); deliberate focus on one man
as a suspect, while simultaneously and ambiguously alluding and detouring also,
to another suspected but uncharged, equally guilty man. From the beginning of
the proceedings. Pure 1984 plagiarized NEWSPEAK (Refer, ‘N.L.P.’).

Both Bandler and Marino murdered her. For their own vulnerability; for what she
knew and could prove about both of them, and a consistently unidentified and
uncounted host of their very spooky, eerie; ominously unidentified
‘company’; solemnly influencing the press, the court, its officers and of
course, all the repeatedly stunned and abused jurists themselves. Literally,
figuratively and virtually, the entire community was dazzled and intimidated;
via the adroitly utilized, spell bindingly mainline local press.

(Everybody get down! The rogue C.I.A. is on the town!)
it is against all American laws for the C.I.A. (rogue or pristine) to operate in
domestic (national) affairs, inside the continental limits of the U.S. Having
been doing so, with unfettered impunity, since 22 November 1963, in Dallas,
Texas. Burying this country in hard drugs and domestic violence, street crime,
endemic mass murders, and blaming it on - and/or hugely lying about it (‘The
crime rate is actually going down’) to - the public at large, ever since.
A MOVEABLE VIETNAM: A Continental Misunderstanding (The war against the American
people, by rogue - corporate state and entertainment industry supported -
government, at local, state and federal levels).

DENIAL IS MORE - And Less- THAN A LARGE RIVER IN NORTH AFRICA
The original court transcripts of the preliminary trial contained affluent and
pre-eminent proof of witnesses, testimony and other evidences that were not even
considered in, and were omitted from the main jury trial. Hence, the preliminary
trial minutes had to be disappeared and/or seriously altered, in order not to
comparatively appear in glaring disagreement with the onerous facade of justice
that became the jury trial, and its veritably demonic ‘resolution’.

DENIAL IS A Crystalline Snow STORM OVER THE N.L.P.-Buried UNITED STATES
Excluded witnesses, testimony and evidence includes the Creager brothers, Floyd
and Harry; who were prevented from testifying at the jury trial, on the false
premise of being protected - on standby as important witnesses for the
prosecution - and harbored at the HOLIDAY INN, a few hundred feet from the
courtroom they were carefully disallowed from entering; while simultaneously
being told and promised that their testimony was vitally important to the
prosecution’s case, and that their testimonial appearance was imminent. Their
‘protectors’ were plain clothed, pistol packing representatives of the
District Attorney’s office, they said.
.........................

In the 36 hour period between the murder and its police reportage, Richard
Bandler offered Floyd Creager (an unemployed Vietnam veteran, suffering from
post traumatic stress disorder; a personal friend of the record) a job as a
‘body guard’; volunteering to provide a firearms permit (for concealed
weapon), and a pistol. Bandler withdrew the offer to Creager, shortly after he (Bandler)
suggested it. Clearly, it was an aborted intention to implicate and frame a
third party (Floyd Creager); for the murder that Bandler and Marino had just
committed, but not yet reported. This testimony by Floyd Creager of these facts,
was never heard-by, or known to, the jury.

Harry Creager, on the other hand, is the former boyfriend of the woman Bandler
planned children with. Some of Bandler’s stepchildren were fathered by Harry
Creager, who, because of his connection to Bandler, through his (now former)
girlfriend, learned and knew a lot about Bandler’s personal life and business
activities. Harry Creager never testified-to, or was known-of, by any of the
Bandler-Marino trial jurists. Through his relationship with Harry Creager’s
former girlfriend, Bandler became familiar with the the Creager brothers,
knowing of Floyd Creager’s pronounced vulnerability, as a potential
‘patsy’...

Bandler’s inclusive motive for murdering Christensen, according to Harry
Creager, is because Christensen was Bandler’s commonlaw wife’s main source
of cocaine supply; which Bandler did not want her (his planned wife and mother
of his planned children - marriage and children being very important to Bandler)
to ingest during her pregnancies. This motive, also, was never presented to or
known by the jury.

In 15 months and 49 articles of SENTINEL and MERCURY News reportage on
this sensational and sleaze festooned murder case, District Attorney and Chief
Prosecutor Arthur Danner’s name is never mentioned publicly, and he is never
reported as making any comments whatsoever about it.

NO PROBLEM IS RESOLVABLE WHEN SURROUNDED BY DENIAL (= grid-lock)
The elimination, omission, obscuration and/or diminishment of witnesses,
testimony and evidence (alternately favoring the prosecution or the defense,
depending on what trial is being ‘fixed’ for who, this time), is the favored
tactic and freely wielded signature of the self-serving, N.L.P. Smash Hit
Emperor of Santa Cruz County, Arthur - ‘Squeeky’ - ReverseTheCharges -
Danner III. Having David Copperfielded major witnesses, testimony and evidence,
along with the constitution of the United States and the Statue of Liberty.
.......................

If a 50,000 megaton nuclear air-burst occurred 2,000 feet above central Los
Angeles, and no one heard it (‘What?): would there be any noise? Continued:

Murder is perfectly legal in Santa Cruz county. All you need is a thick
enough stack of glowing, Geiger counter gagging letters of recommendation, from
large enough groups of Very Important People, Army Intelligence Officers, and
nine dildos, proven beyond a reasonable doubt to have been the well used
property of a widely known bi-sexual dominatrix-lesbian bookkeeper and call girl
(The SENTINEL finally refers to her as a ‘woman’, on the triumphant day
Bandler is acquitted). The overwhelmed jurists, no longer, seeing, hearing,
understanding, feeling or knowing what they used to understand, see, hear, feel
and know. (Paging Ms. Misogyny?)

“Orwell’s Predictions Are Ridiculous”, TIME magazine, 1/1/’84,
continued:
No one in the D.A.’s Office for example - no one in the heart of political
correctness, would be caught dead on the witness stand, being morally
judgemental about any of this. It wouldn’t be prudent (and who knows who the
rogue CIA might waste and rigor mortise, in a floored and overturned chair for
36 hours, next... The guilt saturated, over-sexed victim was, after all,
publicly reported as being in the act of snorting a line of rock & rollex
‘recreational nose kandy’ (among the most insidiously destructive illegal
drugs in the U.S.) at the precisely kosMickarMick moment Ms. Quacko was sooper
mysteriously whacked.
Arthur - Reverse The Charges - Danner was definitely ‘out of the loop’, on
this one, warm-gun-wise. The Chief County Prosecutor is not responsible for what
he is responsible for.

POST SCRIPT
Mr. Danner’s VICTIM WITNESS PROGRAM
is the recipient of the GOVERNOR’S (Wilson’s) AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE

What Art Danner does for an earth scorching encore.
A Few Final Words From The Local Ministries Of Truth & Justice continued:
July 1990. SENTINEL. Regarding Santa Cruz County court minutes relating to the
bygone, ‘resolved’ Bandler-Marino trial: “All forensic (physical) evidence
was destroyed, by order of the judge.” / “It’s fine with me, said
prosecutor Gary Fry, “I want to put that case behind me.”
And so it is. Directly behind him. The instrument of Art Danner’s own undoing.
....................................

Reich & Wong (Some things neve change), continued:
7 April 1995, on page A-1, SENTINEL staff writer May Wong covered Danner,
attending the Los Angeles ‘media circus’, surrounding the O.J. Simpson case:
‘Danner said he also spoke (on CNN) about how he believes the Simpson case
will force changes in the criminal justice system.’ (What EYE suspects): “I
suspect that people will say, ‘Heck. We’ve got to find another way to get
closer to the truth’”, Danner said.
(What EYE blames) “Not surprisingly”, reporter Wong adds, “Danner blamed
defense attorneys for going to the media and raising irrelevant issues.” Well.
That settles it. Danner mentioned ‘the Trailside Murder Case’ and other
issues; never breathing a word of what may be the most sensational and important
case in county homicidal history. Certainly a rogue CIA linked ‘domestic
murder’ case, of capital import.
************************
Arthur Danner is also under long standing charges (that he feloniously will not
allow to be filed against himself or any other of many cited co-offenders) for
his 15 year, actively ongoing participation in a locally active, rogue C.I.A.-motivated,
N.L.P. practicing pedophile cult, stationed out of Los Angeles. Originated by
the feloniously fugitive Richard (“Call me ‘Big Brother Dick’ - ‘Why
don’t you call the police?!”) Robertson, vice president of DPM COMPUTERS;
listed in the L.A. Yellow Pages.

AFTERWARD
The propounded ousting of Mr. Danner sometimes evokes an impotent objection that
he may be replaced by someone worse - thereby gutlessly forsaking the
democratically principled example that must be made in the preservation of
democracy, by expelling and punishing tyrants. Danner’s replacement would in
such action, receive solemnly necessary notice, that the same can indeed happen
to any malrepesentative of publicly empowered office. And, so it could. So far,
no such (sorely overdue) notice has been adequately recognized.

Evoking the Jeffersonian axiom: “Those who do not oppose tyranny, are self
condemned to live under it.”
Likewise cogently relevant here, is the same former president’s advise:
“The price of liberty, is eternally vigilant struggle.” (Paraphrased)
..............................
About The Author:
The 56 year old, 5’7”, 140# Eurasian, S.S.I. disabled record is an ordained
Military Chaplain, and a V.F.W. (Veterans Of Foreign Wars Chief Warrant Security
Officer - one of the two co-founders of V.F.W. Bill Motto - Wage Peace - Post
5888. With no serious police record whatsoever. Never legally charged, let alone
convicted of any felony.

The record is also a Bay Of Pigs, Cuba, ‘61 Expeditionary veteran, with three
and a half consecutive years sea duty on a 35,000 ton ammunition ship (USS Great
Sitkin, AE-17), as a Bosun’s Mate Striker / Coxswain (command authority on
boats), and a naval artillery 1st loader; including a unit citation for the
navy’s first at-sea nuclear weapons transfers.

District Attorney Art Danner III, has, in the past 15 and more years, arraigned
this record five times, for charges including ‘threatening his life (this case
was ‘dismissed in the interests of justice’), and an unrelated charge for
‘battery’, against nine veterans - much younger and larger than the record,
in a 36 month period (‘83 - ‘86); wherein Danner has lost all five
arraignments (all signed by Danner with no other complainants), including a jury
trial for battery, against three maverick veterans younger and larger than this
record - the only jury trial ever converged on Mr. Robertson - also lost by
Danner and his malanthropically wild eyed confederates. Danner’s latest failed
prosecution of this record was between May and October of ‘96, when he falsely
charged this record with ‘felony cultivation of marijuana’. The case was
dismissed - under Judge K. Akao - before it went to trial.

Presently, Danner is vainly asserting false charges of ‘felony firearms
assault’, in what is actually a ‘no charges, no arrest’ case
(‘97SC-93336. Refer Lt. Sepulveda or Lt. Skeery, SCPD), of saving Floyd
Creager’s life (without harming or firing upon anyone of a group of five
juvenile assailants, armed with a baseball bat) on 6/15/’97. Lt. Sepulveda has
commended this record under those circumstances, for its tactical restraint. The
attack occurred in front of the record’s domicile, from which the weapon was
produced and thrice fired in the air, scattering the assailants; all three
rounds landing in the Bay, 400 yards southward.
_______________________________

Speaking of goon squads: since the first publication of this Memorial Record and
its distribution throughout Santa Cruz county (9/’96), the County VETS
OUTREACH officers at 842 Front Street, led by Cy Wannarka, Myrna Cherin, Vets
Memorial Bldg. Manager, Andy Botsford, Parks and Recreation Director, Barry
Samuel, along with the entire 12 chaired, public endangering Vets Memorial
Building *Board Of Trustees, chairmanned by former county Supervisory Board
candidate, Timothy McCormick (*Already under formal suit for ‘mismanagement’
- a suit which they recently lost to local attorney and veteran, Larry Goodman,
in an ‘unrelated case’); have rumorially and conspiratorially persuaded this
record’s federally employed VA (Veterans Administration) counselors, that he
is a threat and a danger to their personal security. Exactly what the cited
Board Of Trustees has been under continuous, Grand Jury Complaint submitted and
officially witnessed, documented fire for, since 22 January ‘97 (Refer the
formal complaints to two Grand Jurys, at the progression of this record).

Meanwhile, County Vets Service Officer Cy Wannarka and chairman Tim McCormick
have persuaded the record’s federal counselors to penetrate his federal claim
confidentiality by a falsely motivated and imposed ‘aversion of danger’
clause; accessing Art Danner and his county cronies (cited above) to this
record’s otherwise ‘confidentialiy guarded’ federal claim.

Thereby thought-policing a hysteria for unauthorized persons, including Cy
Wannarka and Art Danner, to invade this claimant’s federal counselorship and
VA file confidentiality. VA counselor C.L. Burgor was elaborately lied to, by
County Vets Service Officer Cy Wannarka and the publicly endangering Vets
Memorial Bldg. Board of Trustees The 12 chaired Trustee Board hoodwinked federal
counselor Burgor and her immediate superior, Dr. Katherine Yoon to divert the
public endangerment they were found responsible for (In the Santa Cruz County
administered Vets Memorial Building), from themselves, on to this record (K.B.
Robertson).

Resulting in six VA counselors continuing refusal’s to counsel with this
veteran record, for post traumatic stress disorder evaluation and therapy;
displaced with county employee originated lies, defamations, threats;
intimidations projected on and about this record.

Floyd W. Creager, a 100% post traumatic stress disabled Vietnam veteran, was
recently instructed (9/’97) by his VA counselor, Dr. Patrick Murphy (who the
record has never met), not to relate to, socialise with or be friends with this
record anymore, ‘Because he smokes pot (under Medical marijuana
authorization), and he’s crazy’. Character assassination, ‘hazing’,
social ostracization as continuously ongoing conspiratorial objective,
transferred from Arthur Danner’s county government chain of command, to the
cited federal government VA employees. The light drinking record does not use
non-prescription hard drugs. He is a cross-trained Fleet medic and Chaplain,
with nine years service on V.F.W. 7263’s 7th Avenue based Honor Guard.

This report exists to insure public identification and accountability of the
herein cited persons as accessories to, during and after the fact(s), regarding
public endangerment by the Vets Memorial Bldg. Board Of Trustees, led by Cy
Wannarka and Tim McCormick, as well as negligent entrustment (of the Trustee
Board) by the county Board Of Supervisors (responsible for the Vets Memorial
Bldg., under state senate bill 544, in the jurisdiction of state senator Bruce
McPherson). This report includes making known to the reading public, not only
public endangerment by the cited offenders, but also the described - county and
federal government joined - oppression of this VA applicant and claimant, and
supression of the above documented ‘Code Of Silence In Santa Cruz County’ -
documented evidence, witnesses and testimony from an unresolved murder case
(There is no statute of limitations on murder).

Mr. Danner and a host of his associates are also conspiratorially coordinated in
obstructing justice, and in many cases, supporting and functionally representing
an underway, undeterred, locally active, N.L.P. and Orwellean NewSpeak-practicing
pedophile cult (originated by Dick Robertson, vice president of DPM COMPUTERS in
Los Angeles, rogue C.I.A. - Experimental PsyWar - operative; initiator of THE
ROBERTSON FAMILY CONSPIRACY) - tenaciously dedicated to feloniously extending
while simultaneously denying, covering up and/or conspiratorially blaming their
feloniously insidious trespasses on others, including this record.
_____________________________________________________________

Below, is a letter to C.I.A. Director Robert Gates, dated 13 March '92,
Friday, from the record.
Director Robert Gates K.B. Robertson
Central Intelligence Agency 114 Maple #2
Washington, D.C. Santa Cruz, CA.
20505 95060
13 March 1992Dear Director Robert Gates:
From the ascribed date, the following communication becomes a matter of
permanent public record: with regard to Richard Robertson V of Los Angeles, vice
president of DPM COMPUTERS, near North Hollywood, California; who arrogantly
claims to be employed by your agency; operating inside the U.S.A.

Between 19 and 25 November, 1990, I audio tape-recorded a conversation between
my oldest brother, Richard Robertson V, and myself. A full verbatim
transcription of this communication is on pages ~ thru~ , below, near the close
of this report.
In this for the moment briefly described conversation, the former confirms the
following:A. He openly acknowledges and complains of a raped infant daughter in
(then, since the time of) late 1963; corroborate with the presidential
assassination chronology.B. He has never reported, or allowed the reportage of the crime.C. Richard Robertson is still overtly and conspiratorially blaming our
stepfather, William Henry Oshie, for the unreported crime.

On the other hand, this record is given every reason to believe, that Richard
('Call me Big Brother Dick') Robertson has covertly blamed this crime on his
younger brother, K.B. Robertson; this record. Having mobilized the qualified
(voluntarily engaged) public to do so (blame this record for what Richard
Robertson and his friends, is, are, and continue to be responsible for); since
late 1963.

Nineteen years ago, in 1971, I documented exactly how I learned of this crime;
from whom, when and under what circumstances:
The (qualified) public in my direct experience has been very effectively and
specifically mobilized to methodologically punish and ostracize me, for the rape
of a child in 1963: ABOVE THE LAW , MORALITY and REASON. That, the
participational public was motivated by, Richard 'Big Brother’ (BB) Robertson
- who gives a new meaning to and assigns a new mission for Orwell's NEWSPEAK and
DoubleThink; inspires his conspiratorial following by referencing his
affiliation with your agency. This last information derived 11/'90 from he and
his (amazing) wife.

In the early '70s, the record, upon receiving and reporting this information to
the San Francisco police; who insisted:'We need a complaint from the parents';
vacuously asked this record:'Why wasn't this crime reported earlier?'

It is in fact felonious for the parents not to report this crime, when they know
of it; as Richard Robertson has already proven in his own audio taped words that
he does.

On the other hand, it is patently insane (and felonious) to hold this record
responsible for causing the culpable parents - especially the father, to report
this crime; which this record learned of only when Richard Robertson finally
told the record (3/'70, Concord, CA.) seven years after the allegory fact; still
being complained about and blamed on other people (11/'90), including this
record.

It is also felonious for the parents to secretly blame this unreported crime on
anyone else; all who 'help' or comply are likewise, criminal accessories to the
ongoing fact(s).

(Accessory obstructers of justice, aiders, abettors and accessorized
feloniously fugitive pedophiles, by any other name. There is no Arizona state or
federal statute of limitations on pedophilia - tantamount to murder... )

The (eventually informed) police have never allowed any signed complaint(s); the
record being under documented, continuous coordinated siege; including the
black-listing of his book, GRAVITY IS THE 4th DIMENSION, by the rumor mobilized
public; for over 20 years. If the targeted author receives public recognition
and credit for his achievements, the ROFACO will be exposed and recognised for
it’s achievements.

It is felonious to participate in, comply with or willfully deter and obstruct
the reporting of this elaborately documented, ongoing crime. The conspiratorial
participants constitute nothing less than a continuing, 29 year old undeterred,
proliferately growing pedophile cult (Refer: The Deliberate Manufacture Of
Falsehood And What It Is Doing To Our Lives, by Ian Mitroff and Warren
Bennis./ Who Murdered Mae Brussell And Why: 'Entertainment Industry
Psychological Warfare' and the findings of Stanley Milgram's PERILS OF
OBEDIENCE).

In late 1990, the record also learned that his mother, *Martta H. Savolainen
Robertson Oshie, 'disappeared', without explanation, with his Algonquin
nationalized, Ojibway Chippewa tribalized stepfather, *W.H. Oshie, in 1975. No
relative has seen or heard anything from or about either of them, since last
*contacted in Phoenix and Tucson, Arizona, 1975; *both key witnesses in the
original formation of the subjected conspiracy.

Upon being told by this record, 'It is felonious for you to be blaming our
stepfather', Dick Robertson boldly replied:'Why don't you go find him and tell him?!'
- Richard Robertson, 11/24/'90; speaking of the man he is feloniously and
conspiratorially blaming for pedophilia.Imperatively demanding that someone else carry out his responsibility(ies)
for him. Dick Robertson’s methodological signature. The ‘whispering wind’
under his BB (Big Brother) codified, broken wings. The heroically worshiped
leader of all pedophiles and their advocates, everywhere.. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Richard Robertson V. Vice president of DPM COMPUTERS, Los Angeles. A CIA extant
and rogue operative since Army duty in Germany, mid late fifties. Former
employee of IBM and REMINGTON RAND. Holds a Master’s Degree in Business
Administration. Electronics Engineering, Computer Engineering, and a degree in
law (L.L.B.) Res. ph. 1-818-982-7524. Address unknown. DPM COMPUTERS is
listed in the L.A. Yellow Pages.

Richard Robertson is self proven, asking everyone else for decades to do his
job for him, he finally got around to telling the record to tell *Bill Oshie,
what he (Richard Robertson) was obliged to tell his *stepfather and the police
about, since late 1963. Still asking somebody else, to contact his stepfather:
“Why don’t you go find ‘em and tell ‘em?” - that Dick Robertson is -
for decades - secretly and conspiratorially accusing him of pedophilia.

Exactly what Dick Robertson has said this way, on audio tape, of his stepfather,
is what he has gotten other people to do, relative to this record ('Big
brother's little brother'). Who Richard Robertson is blaming at the current time
- who he blames (his stepfather or his youngest brother), seems to depend on who
he's talking to.

Dick Robertson V, now resides in North Hollywood; the vice president of DPM
COMPUTERS in Los Angeles; DPM stands for Don P. Moser, who is the president of
that self described, allegory C.I.A. affiliated company.

Richard Robertson has traditionalized an effective disciple-gathering
purportation to be an employee of your agency, the Central Intelligence Agency.
Originally under his US Army affiliation and post service employment with I.B.M.
and the RAND Corporation.

This certainly 'explains' the ongoing, all-time police refusal to allow this
case to be reported: the suspension of all the conspiratorial target's
constitutional rights - placing him on psychiatric medical hold on three
different occasions of attempting to report this crime to San Francisco police
(in the early ‘70’s, as will be documented herein).

The third medical hold historically imposed on this record, culminating in a
Superior Court statement resolved that this is a police case and that this
record is a victim of its (feloniously fugitive, neighborhood mesmerizing, amock
running), non-reported status, to the best knowledge of the staff and resident
doctors (including Dr. Herbert) at Mission Terrace Hospital in San Francisco; in
the early to mid '70's. San Francisco police, Ballantine and Hansen, still
refused to allow any police report to be filed by this record.

Santa Cruz county district attorney Art Danner III, is likewise indictable for
refusing to allow reportage (5/’84) and, for direct conspiratorial
participation ('It would be wrong to mace a child!' - Asst. D.A. Norton -
what the D.A.’s office did, in court - about the ROFACO complaint sent in ten
months earlier. More will be said about this ‘child macing’ demonization,
later in this report) while losing grotesquely inverted battery charges
against this record (3/'86) in the only jury trial he's ever been the subject
of.

Other known; provable local participants and complicitors include Sheriff's
Deputy O'Hare, Chris Matthews, Judge Tom Kelly, public defender James Macmillan,
Dr. John Gillette, V.F.W. members Timothy McCormick, Robert ('Watch your
children when Ben's around') Shippen, Richard ('W.e. A.re A.ll H.eroes! <W.A.A.H.!>'/'Did
you do it?') Anderson, Steve ('Ben bit someone's ear off and is known to carry a
gun') Bare, Robert ('Ben is an enemy of the post') Hall, Steve ('I heard about
you and I've got your number') Hasna, and Lee T. Bookout - from anonymous
thousands.

The record is bringing this pedophile fugitive (R. Robertson V) to justice under
title 18, CONSPIRACY Code - no limits statutes: to publicly hold him to account,
with still active, documented, recent social oppressors: so designated by
Richard - Big Brother (BB - Big Brothers initials, and the second letter of
the alphabet, twice in a row, numerologically equaling 22; codifically
referencing ‘CATCH 22’) - Robertson (Who finally told this record, in
1970, of this crime and, that <he says> he is blaming on our stepfather;
since '63, as is documented herein in the transcribed audio-tape of November,
‘90, on pages ~ thru ~ below).

Dick Robertson is motivated since, to criminally 'transfer' his responsibility
for this qualified, subjected crime onto someone else - alternately blaming it
on his stepfather, William Henry Oshie, and his youngest brother, Kent Benjamin
Robertson (the record).
The conspiring family - the initiators, originators and perpetuators of such a
non reported crime, other-person-blaming and punishing cult - invariably
evaluates and selects by 'pecking order’-applied standards; as to who is
determined to be guilty, and who can't possibly - must not - have anything to do
with it. In the collusively vile, covertly conspiratorial name of ('lights out')
'resolution'.

Such an assailant's wife, quite predictably defends him; is not merely
ignorant of the truth, but, also quite predictably and importantly: does not
want to know the truth. In this contrived scenario, the mother and the
conspiring - back room seancing - family, equal a crowd such as that documented
above, in Guatemala, murdering an innocent person, who has been patently proven
to be innocent: before they went on to murder her (anyway).
Pedophiles and their subordinate participants and complicitors are notoriously
known to be compulsive repeaters; require compulsively repetitious attacks on
targeted victims; in this case by as many persons as can be persuaded to attack
and otherwise harass Big Brother's (‘puny, wimpy, powerless, known
megalomaniacal’) little brother. Orwellean NEWSPEAK (and bullet dodging ducks)
quacked - and whacked - fluently here.

The record has been in personal consultation with congressman Panetta of the
16th federal district for the past eight years (at the time of this 1989
writing, which has since then been updated). On 3 January, '92, the congressman
(and others) reviewed the audio tapes (transcribed in later portions of this
documentary report) and received copies of verbatim transcriptions, of Dick
Robertson personally confirming A., B., and C., above; whereupon the congressman
finally expressed his tentative willingness to carry federal prosecution (title
18 - no statutes of limitation) to Dick Robertson.

Panetta has stipulated:“I don't want to do this by the seat of my pants. I would like some backup
on this"; since learning in late '90, that this record's eldest brother
('Ha! What can you do?! Why not turn me over to the police?!’) is a (berserked;
amok) C.I.A. constituent.

Can you, Director Gates, assure the congressman, with the requested 'back up'?.
Will you please do so? Simply allow the law to carry out what it has been and
continues to be disallowed from doing, and/or through abuse of office, by
malrepresentative officials: feloniously chooses not to do.

(There, never having been a 'choice' in this matter, with regard to reportage of
crime, from the advent of Richard Robertson's problem, and his evolved, extra
judicial adventures of influencing the neighborhood to blame it on and
enthusiastically punish somebody else for it, in the pedophile cult endorsed
name of ‘resolution’...)

The record will be happy to provide whatever further information and proof he
has of this, at your request. The subjected congressman has on file several
hundred pages of my submitted; detailed statements and documentation on this
case; since 1984. The record most urgently requests your interest and action in
this extant, actively ongoing, feloniously unresolved, socio-legal abomination.
R.S.V.P., I am respectfully yours,
Kent Benjamin Robertson, 13 March, '92

DANNER’S LIST. Anthologised by Bob LaMonica
9 June, 1987. Under many witnesses, Mr. Danner consumes a gin and tonic and part
of a second over 45 minute period, prior to colliding head on into another
vehicle, driven by Sandra Larsen, who sustains serious head injuries. Larsen is
given a field sobriety test in the emergency room, her blood was ‘analyzed in
elaborate tests’; shows no trace of alcohol or drugs.

Mr. Danner is not given a field sobriety or blood test. ‘A diagram attached to
the (police) report shows the accident was ‘front end to front end’, and is
called ‘a fender-bender’, that occurred when Danner attempted to turn left
(out of the JURY ROOM bar’s parking lot on Ocean Street, across from the court
house and Gvt. Bldg.) into oncoming traffic.” (Going the wrong way down a ONE
WAY STREET.) Three months later, Mr. Danner is cited for ‘failure to yield
right of way’.

Mr. Danner settled out of court with Ms. Sandra Larsen, for $20,000.00 bodily
damages. The SENTINEL newspaper delayed reportage of this ($20,000.00 ‘fender
bending’) event for two weeks. The incident occurred just prior to a county
election, and in the midst of the preliminary trial of Bandler-Marino, in
the Corine Christensen murder case (as documented in ‘The “Code Of
Silence” In Santa Cruz County).
- San Jose Mercury News, 12 June 1990
.........................

Mr. Danner hires in late 1985, Tehama County Deputy District Attorney Christine
McGuire, who had prosecuted against her public defender and romantic partner, a
violent felony case. The conviction was reversed by Appellate opinion citing
“sustained dating relationship with the prosecutor”.
- Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Complaint, 27 October 1994
.........................

Jason A. Hopkins, son of Jon Hopkins, Santa Cruz County Chief Deputy District
Attorney, is arrested and booked in county jail on charges of possession for
sale of psilocybin mushrooms, 18 March 1988. Decision arranged with Attorney
General’s Office not to file charges. Mr. Danner states “It was handled like
any other case.”
- San Jose MERCURY News, 31 January 1989
...................

Mr. Danner decides not to prosecute Sheriff’s Officer Todd Liberty for
excessive use of force against George Nichols. Mr. Nichols, who states he would
have settled “for an apology and a handshake,” sues. Federal judge views
video of the 1991 incident, grants summary judgement of $390,000.00 to Mr.
Nichols. Total loss to County including legal fees: about $500,000.00
- Santa Cruz County Grand Jury complaint. 27 October 1994
.....................

Mr. Danner’s function as Public Administrator, which resolves estate and
property issues, with power to sieze assets and rule on competence, has raised
major questions in numerous cases. - Several public sources have raised this
issue.
......................

Mr. Danner, in violation of procedural rights, quietly banishes 11 year director
of Victim Witness Program, Judy Osborn, to kitchen of District Attorney
headquarters at Watsonville Courthouse, without desk, telephone or computer,
August 1993. Ms. Osborn is prohibited from sending or receiving mail. Ms. Osborn
succombs to stress, goes on medical leave in December 1993.
- Santa Cruz County Grand Jury complaint, 27 October 1994
..................

Tara Fawett is arrested, 3 September 1994 in connection with drive-by shooting,
booked into County jail on charges of accessory to attempted murder and drunken
driving. Louis Rittenhouse, Tara Fawcett’s stepfather, calls Mr. Danner
regarding the matter. Mr. Danner calls Judge Tom Kelly. $250,000.00 bail is
dropped . Ms. Fawcett is released. “The contact we had with the councilman (Rittenhouse)
had no impact on why we made the decision,” said Mr. Danner.
- Santa Cruz SENTINEL newspaper. 15 September 1994
.........................

Mr. Danner takes a $1,600 trip to Washington, D.C. to attend Crime Bill signing.
In a September 12, 1994 letter (the day he left) Mr. Danner submits requests for
travel reimbursement. County rules require approval in advance. On September 13
(the day after he left), County Board Of Supervisors vote 4-1 to approve the
trip, after the District Attorney is already arrived in Washington, via stolen
County funds.
- Santa Cruz SENTINEL newspaper, 18 September 1994
.........................

Mr. Danner places Assistant District Attorney Catherine Gardner on
administrative leave, 18 March 1994, then fires her on 20 July. Time cards are
falsified at Mr. Danner’s direction for 17 weeks at full pay (including
benefits, about $30,000.00). When Ms. Gardner demands a civil service hearing,
the covered-up, falsified timecards surface. Mr. Danner asserts he has the
authority to go against County code. Mr. Danner responds to Auditor-Controller
Gary Knudson’s preliminary report on the matter with “I may just decide
I’ve had enough and decide what to do legally,” saying he might sue Mr.
Knudson if his final report is not, according to Mr. Danner, legally correct. On
6 December 1994, Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors vote 4-1 to take no
action against Mr. Danner. Outgoing Sheriff Al Noren says “I think the
(supervisory) board fell flat on their asses - or faces.”
- San Jose MERCURY news, 17 October 1994;
Santa Cruz SENTINEL, 7 & 8 December, 1994
.....................

“The Borland Amendment”:
Gordon Eubanks, CEO of Cupertino based Symantec Corp., and Eugene Wang are
charged with stealing trade secrets from Wang’s former employer, Borland, in
1992. Defense attorneys suggest “Maybe the case should have been investigated
by somebody independent”, since Borland is a Santa Cruz County company.

Mr. Danner calls comment “lawyer’s tricks.” Hearings uncover that the
District Attorney’s office had accepted $13,00.00 from Borland to defray cost
of investigation, and that Jonathan Rivers, a key investigator on the case, went
to work for Borland days after Santa Cruz County Grand Jury had indicted Wang
and Eubanks in February 1993. On 23 August 1993, Judge Bill Kelsay disqualifies
the District Attorney from prosecuting the case, stating “rather strong
evidence of a reasonable possibility of compromise of prosecutorial
discretion” and, “If the District Attorney’s office continues with this
prosecution, they (District Attorney officials) will be on trial”.

A FORMAL COMPLAINT
TO THE SANTA CRUZ COUNTY GRAND JURY
TO: TheGrand Jury of Santa Cruz County From:*Kent
Benjamin Robertson
(Former case number CC99-102)
19 August 2000The Judicial, Journalistic, Veterans Administration & ROGUE C.I.A.
INSPIRED CODE OF SILENCE In Santa Cruz County. Part IIIA Case History.Urgent Introductory Note: this formal complaint was originally
submitted to the Grand Jury of 99 - 2000. Then assigned as CC99-102. It is
modified and revisionally edited for re-submission and re-address to the Grand
Jury of 2000-2001, for highly qualified, documented and self-explicitly
clarified reasons provided, forthwith. It was firstly submitted 27 July, 99.
Condensed and re-submitted 28 September, 99. Foreperson Al Richard's
responded, 19 October, ‘99, that the submitted complaint 'does not meet
the required guidelines of a complaint; leaving no alternative but to close the
case as presented.'Also reminding the complainant that the issued
complaint, 'has to be in the Grand Jury's jurisdiction'.

As though this complaint was not qualified as such, and/or might not
be in the Grand Jury's jurisdiction. Foreperson Richard's brief letter also
explained that four (of nineteen jurists, including five alternative) chairsconstituted a Crime Committee, that disqualified the submitted complaint.
Intimating that only 4 of 19 Grand Jury members received or knew of the
complaint. The record requested then (and still respectfully requests)
instructions as to how the alleged 'unmet guidelines' can be satisfactorily
fulfilled. Without response from the previous Grand Jury. For - in this case
- unjustified reasons, 15 of 19 formerly incumbent, now adjourned jury members
had no knowledge of this complaint for the first eight months following its
7/27/ ‘99 submission. Incorrect reasons for closure of this case are
unequivocally manifest in the foregoing. In accordance with redress of
grievances, under the 1st Amendment. of the US. constitution.Complainant
requests a response, including the assignment of a new case number to
corroborate this resubmitted case. (To the Grand Jury of 2000 - 2001.)

Re-submitted complaint follows:In response to notice from Grand Jury, dated 15 September and received, 18
September, 99, Sat. (on permanent file) Please note: The
(previous) Grand Jury forepersons (Al Richard's) letter also states a preference
for a one page complaint. But this is not a requirement (as the formal Complaint
Form - Civ. GJ 1 Rev. 3/ 95, itself clarifies: 'If more space is required,
continue on reverse side and if necessary, attach extra sheets to this complaint
form.'). Complainant defers to the lengthy history, abundance and
diversity of Mr. Danner's criminal actions and their culpably self incriminated,
government busting and belaboring, infrastructural administrative tributaries.
The consequent requirement here, for multiple pages of description, constituting
this complaint. Mr. Danner's trespasses and those of his criminal
complicitors and participatory accessories are extensive. Herein (as CC99-102)
severely abbreviated (now re-submitted to the Grand Jury of 2000 - 2001 as
CC00-005). While maintaining highly qualified documentation and specificity.
In lieu of more specific requirements, requests and/or instructions from the
Grand Jury; from whom the record implores understanding.

This record will continue to do everything within reason to meet your
requests and/or understandable requirements. Please continue to honor me with
communicating same, freely .

There are many individual abuses, and many individual abusers of office here, to
investigate, gainsay, reprimand, correct, charge, and/or indict. Be
reminded: These problems and their ingenuously causal *hosts have a
recent (if already ominously obscure) history of overwhelming, criminally
paralyzing; then terminating a sitting county Grand Jury.

The Grand Jury of 96 -97 went extinct months before completing its
obligatory, state senate law required year of incumbency. Due to a series of
voluntary resignations. For reasons of intrigue and duplicity imposed upon Grand
Jury membership(s) by their justice obstructing *legal advisors in key county
government stations (*as below listed; marked with asterisks). As explained in
the foregoing.

State law requires each county to have a Grand Jury in place at all times.
How that Grand Jury is further instrumentalized is at the advisory and
instructional binding discretion(s) of the below listed, cited, county
government employed offenders. Each cited official a proven nemesis unto his
and herself. Tampering with and otherwise illegally advising and instructing the
Grand Jury: having become their proven, justice-evading policy since the
sinister extinctification of the Grand Jury of 96 - 97. Emerged again over the
Grand Jury of 99 - 2000 in the insidious closure of CC99-102. Presently hovering
over the incumbent, newly installed Grand Jurists of 2000 - 2001.

I am very sincerely, respectfully and gratefully yours, K.B. Robertson.Under federal, state and county law, the (former) chief prosecutor is
already felonious (sans limitations statutes)in his
obligatory and undone duties regarding non prosecution of a capital crime;
namely murder in the first degree; of Corine Christensen. With regard to the
uncharged star witness in the Bandler-Marino case of 11/ ‘86 - 1/ ‘88.
Namely, one James Marino: self confessed - on the witness stand - accessory to
the fact in first degree murder (in admitting he concealed the murder weapon;
his description of its location then confirmed by Sheriffs divers; from the
Capitola pier, 11/ ‘86); as per the court minutes of Mr. Marino's
described confession. Refer, Richard Bandler vs. The people. Critically
important testimony and witnesses were very deliberately excluded from the main
trial by the prosecuting attorney(s). Certainly including the witness-ship
testimonies of *Floyd and Harry Creager, the former of whom was *tentatively
framed for the murder (the proven effort <intent to frame an innocent
person> was aborted before being carried through), without the jury's
knowledge. Including the jury's deprivation of many other importantly omitted
informations, such as the ‘disappeared’ preliminary trial minutes. Judge
Cottle issued illegal jury instructions; as proven in closing trial minutes, 1/
‘88. Both Mr. Marino and Mr. Bandler were strangely and notably made immune to
all drug charges.Whereas, neither man (of the only surviving witnesses)
present at the murder scene was legally made immune to murder.

Yet, Mr. Marino proves out to the time of this writing, to be uncharged with
the murder he proved himself accessory to the fact in; as described above. The
non prosecution of Mr. Marino is dereliction of duty, obstruction of justice,
and accessory after the fact on the part of the *district attorney, Mr. Danner's
- since manifestly evident - crucial role as accessory to the fact in
deliberately obstructing justice (conspiracy to exclude witnesses, evidence and
testimony from the main trial); contrivation to avoid prosecution; criminal
negligence.

The deliberate withholding of evidence and testimony from the †main trial
in the cited case; by the peculiarly selected, itinerant - out of town; non
homicide case experienced - prosecution (Gary Fry. His case closing
statement: We can’t prosecute Mr. Marino. We have no evidence against Mr.
Marino. We must have evidence to prosecute 1/ ‘88, SENTINEL. Gary Fry is since
become a federal prosecutor). †As compared with the evidence and witnesses
who were called to participate in the preliminary hearing. From which the
minutes were mysteriously *disappeared (for years; reappearing in a local
judges chambers with equal mystery); *post incidental to the preliminary
hearings (June, ‘87) and prior to the main trial (12/ ‘87 - 1/ ‘88).
Refer, the (submitted) documentary 16 page *CODE OF SILENCE IN SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
(attached).

Mr. Danner's assistant prosecutor (+Norton, March, ‘86) proved himself a
spokesman for Mr. Danner's (+proven) part in the Robertson Family Conspiracy
(a feloniously fugitive pedophile cult, documentary cited in the Grand Jury
deposition of 7/26/99 -CC99-102. +Refer, the attached two page letter to C.I.A.
Director, Robert Gates, dated 13 March, 92). When +he subjected a (+'It would be
wrong to mace a') child, in court and +projected that child in Mr.
Robertson's face; under Mr. Robertson's (VFW, congressionally chartered, Chief
Security Officer’s) state licensed mace. While losing - singular
complainant - Danner's battery charges against Mr. Robertson, in the first jury
trial the latter has ever been the defendant in, in his presently 59 years. +Transporting
and placing a child where it doesn't belong. A thematically compulsive
behavioral trademark and unrestrained urgency of the Robertson Family Conspiracy
(ROFACO) participants and practitioners. Regarding the chronic abuse,
misuse and perversely motivated, literal and contextual invocation,
transportation, misplacement, misrepresentation of children: aiding, +abetting
and representing a fugitive pedophile. Adding to Richard Robertson’s
unchallenged offenses: locally, recently and endemically carrying out the extra
judicial blaming and punishing of someone else (K.B. Robertson and his
stepfather, W.H. Oshie) for a federal and state crime on which there is no
statute of limitations; in Santa Cruz county, California state and the United
States.Under the direct and punitive influence of his feloniously fugitive,
multiple pedophile father - Richard Robertson V - this record's 27 year old
nephew, Douglas, a prime witness against his father, doused his body with
gasoline and immolated himself, in his mothers condominium kitchen, Hollywood,
California, 11 September, 1990. Acquiring 3rd degree burns on 90% of his body;
except his face and groin. Douglas Robertson died, six weeks later, on or about
Halloween day of 90. A matter of official record.

Seven years earlier, April ‘84, Mr. Danner was petitioned formally
(by this record; via a 173 page documentary report) to take action against local
and active elements of the cited Robertson Family Conspiracy. (ROFACO) Mr.
Danner's representative - in May '84, a Mr. Justin Lighty, an assistant DA.; on
a county letterhead - denied any obligation on the district attorney's part, to
take action against said local elements (including Tim McCormick and Robert. E.L.
Shippen). The record submits that, if such obligatory action had been taken by
Danner in '83, Douglas Robertson would still be alive today. For this reason the
record charges Mr. Danner, for the manslaughter of Douglas ('paranoid
schizophrenic') Robertson; under the colors; i.e. special circumstances incurred
in Mr. Danner's office and criminally forsaken obligations as a public servant;
under the law.

Mr. Danner is found red handed stealing 30 thousand dollars of county
taxpayers money. This information unexpectedly surfaced at an unanticipated
civil service hearing (A former Asst. DA.,, Catherine Gardner, publicly
contesting her former superior, District Attorney Art Danner III): revealed
the theft by Mr. Danner and his efforts to cover it up.

Diving Further Into The Wreck
All this information unexpectedly emerged when former Asst. DA. Catherine
Gardner formally contested Mr. Danner's firing of herself... Civil Service
hearing revealed furthermore that Mr. Danner compounded his theft by trying to
cover it up in counterfeiting false time cards; as though the fired employee
were working - serving the county - for the stolen money. (Refer, DANNER'S LIST,
attached.)

The Board Of Supervisors did not then; neither does it now have the authority
to *authorize the proven theft (via any judgmentally pretentious, extra judicial
‘ratification’). Multifariously, routinely and ambitiously giving
increased meaning to the observation that the law is meaningless, if and when
it is not enforced: regarding Mr. Danner's proven, multi-felonious, grandly
larcenous - under the colors; ex officio mocking actions. The Board Of
Supervisors extended ratification (*Resolution # 114-95, 4/-4/ ‘95), having
inclusively succeeded only in incriminating its Danner-rescuing innovators
(Obstruction of justice. Categorically defined conspiracy - in four out of five
supervisorial chairs - to avoid prosecution); as accessories to Mr. Danner's
original crime(s): grand larceny; trying to conceal same. Busting the Board Of
Supervisors; then effecting the †extirpation of the ( † ‘96 - ‘97) Grand
Jury itself: to save himself from justice via misrepresentation of office:
aggregate abuse of power. Contiguous factual accessories, justice
obstructions and obstructers of justice.

†The Grand Jury received public sector-originated complaints in the wake of
all of the above $30,000.00 theft and ratification controversy; shortly
thereafter going extinct.Via a precipitous rash of voluntary
resignations resulting from internal gridlock about whether or not action should
be taken against Danner and/or the Board Of Supervisors (both of which elements
constitute the authoritative arms of the Grand Jury. Bearing out monumentally
demonstrated *conflict of interest. Further compounding the cited offenses).
Resulting in †dissolution of the Santa Cruz county's Grand Jury before it
completed its annual term; between 6/ ‘96 and 6/ ‘97. State law requires a
sitting Grand Jury in all California counties: at all times. The state leaves
to each county government, how the Grand Jury is predisposed. *The
Grand Jury's decreed, contractual authority originates in advise from the Board
Of Supervisors and the D.A.'s office, as well as the County Counsel (a select
group of county employed lawyers) and the county Superior Court...

A similarly duplicitous Danner-intrigue, involving $808,000.00, recently
emerged, 6/21/2000, in the Santa Cruz SENTINEL. Wherein, Mr. Danner asserts that
the *Supervisory Board and *County Auditor Knutson knew of the ‘squirreled
away’ money. All of the latter, Danner-referenced authorities flatly deny any
such knowledge. Refused to give him his usually provided shelters and ad hoc
ratifications. On 12 July, 2000 a METRO DeCinzo cartoon aptly described Mr.
Danner's earned reputation as 'a well known sleaze bag.' Mr. Danner dares not
sue for slander: because the understatementis historically
and overwhelmingly the proven truth.
Clandestinely withholding this accumulating state subsidized money, for years
(and years)... At the expense of single mothers and their children, who were
intended to benefit from it. Constitutes solemn derilection of duty and plural
criminal contingencies. Lying about Board Of Supervisors and County Auditor
alleged knowledge of same constitutes a failed effort to cover up and/or
decriminalize the ‘rat-holed money’ and/or criminalize the Supervisory Board
and County Auditor. No charges have been brought forth on this so far.
Complainant requests that Mr. <'No secrets here'> Danner be charged with
dereliction of duty; negligent entrustment <including negligent abuse of
single mothers , their children; the tax burdened community> - and coverup of
same <attempting to hide behind, lie about, entangle and otherwise
incriminate others> on this - stylistically precedented - note, alone. Intent
to steal these secretly hidden funds is strongly evidenced here. ('it
doesn't make any sense.' Danner's defense. Also asking What
advantage is there?, with regard to his uncovered, vainly denied secret.
(Nearly a million dollars secretly withheld from it’s intended recipients,
accumulating for years; concealed for mysterious reasons: portends one hell of
an ‘advantage’. It is not for the press or the public to discern ‘What
advantage’ there is here, it is for Mr. Danner to explain; which he hasn’t
done and very notably hasn’t been obliged to do....)The Initial Grounds For The Commencement Of This Ever Since case closed
Complaint:
Mr. Robertson became aware of a Vets Memorial Bldg. security - public
endangerment - issue, when he began counseling at that location with county
hosted federal counseling Team Leader, C.L. Burgor, in November, 96. The record
repeatedly observed no staff in the building between noon and 1: PM, while the
building was left open to public access and a federal counselor. Who routinely
started her Monday scheduled, six hour counseling sessions at noon; was left
unsecured on the second floor, assigned to a counseling room immediately
adjacent to two publicly facilitated bathrooms, with a history of gang-logos
carved in the walls, used condoms on the floor, and residual white powder on the
backs of the camodes.

Mr. Robertson discreetly and privately brought this situation to Mr. Cy
Wannarka's (County Vets Outreach Service Officers) attention (by phone). The
latter, flatly denied any security problem and any responsibility for building
security; refused for five ensuing weeks to take the issue to the county
assigned Vets Memorial Bldg. Trustee Board. Wannarka spoke of counselor Burgor's
autonomy and said that she had not complained of any security issue. The record
reminded Mr. Wannarka that it was inappropriate to entangle federal counselor
Burgor in the county jurisdictioned issue and obtained Wannarka's agreement at
that time not to reveal the security problems to the federal counselor, using
the county assigned Rm. 22 on the 2nd Flr., on Mondays between noon and 6:pm.

The balked record was thereby circumstantially required by Vets Service
Officer, Cy Wannarka to attend a 1/22/ ‘97 convened Vets Memorial Bldg. Board
Of Trustees meeting; obliged thereby to do Mr. Wannarka's and the Board Of
Trustees job for them. (*record was initially told, repeatedly, by several
different board members, later including Parks Director Barry Samuel, that there
was no security problem in the building. 1/22/ ‘97 Board Meeting: Board Member
James Wainscoat. Sitting immediately adjacent to the record, leaned into the
latters face and proclaimed:
‘There is no security problem in this building. The little lady on the
couch (Bldg. Mgr. Andy Botsford) has it covered.’ (Laughter. An anonymous male
voice from the presiding membership interjects: *'Killer on the road.' (*The
next lyrical line of which is, 'His brains are squirmin' like a toad.')
Wainscoat adds assertively: ‘If you want security in this building, you can
pray for it!’Wainscoat is a Wannarka assigned Trustee Board member.
This denial and allusion to *prayer occurred 22 January, 97; at a formally
convened meeting, under over a dozen witnesses and on audiotape. *It
contradicts the constitutional separation of church and state.

Chairman McCormick repeatedly tried to gavel the unexpectedly becalmed Mr.
Robertson down: *You're out of order! (Acronymically spelled *Y.O.O.O!).
Followed by an anonymously murmured echo in male voice from presiding
membership. *He's out of order! (*Acronymically spelled H.O.O.O.!). Notice also
that the *statement is falsely applied to the complainant when it applies to
Board Member James (‘Pray for security’) Wainscoat. The record submits that
this ambush was planned by Wannarka, McCormick, Wainscoat and anonymous
others. The self-revealing objective being to provacatively get Mr. Robertson to
lose his temper; do something unreasonable that would ecliptically
displace/divert from the real issues in contention.

This ambush-attack method is evident in the behavior of this records self
made adversaries throughout this described complaint: The methodological
motivation for tabling the finally reluctantly acknowledged and
voted upon (11-1) acknowledged security problem and refusing to
respond furthermore (for eighteen months) to Mr. Robertson's weekly mailed
complaints to the Board Of Supervisors, as well as Mr. Robertson's unanswered
voice mail depositions on Mr. Wannarka's after hours answering devise. The
manifest ambush-attack method of provocation of complainant is particularly
evident in the ex tempor lockdown of Mr. Robertson five months later at Fort Ord.
6/26/ ‘97, which will be explained in the foregoing. Moreover: Chairman
YoooHooo McCormick is on record as a ROFACO participant, since 1983.

Counselor Burgor's name was never mentioned by this record or anyone else at the
issued meeting of 1/22/ ‘97. Prior to the meeting, Mr. Robertson had talked to
Board spokesman Wannarka (late Nov., '96) about her personal endangerment as
well as that of the cross sectionally considered public, during noon to 1:PM
periods when staff abandoned the building while leaving it open to the public.
Wannarka agreed not to involve Burgor.Wannarka continues to state himself autonomously unaccountable to/for the
record’s inquiries on behalf of public security; regarding the Board Of
Trustees very reluctantly obtained, 11-1 agreed upon (then tabled, ever since
subjectively occulted, further denied, filibustered and/or ignored) violations
of Health & Safety codes. Accompanied by the *negligent entrustment thereby,
of the pretentiously aloof Board Of Supervisors, since the benchmarked, Board Of
Trustees meeting of 1/22/ ‘97. Refer, state senate *Bill 544, proving the
(negligently entrusting) county Board Of Supervisors responsible for the cited
Vets Memorial Bldg. Board Of Trustees.State senate bill 544 confirmationally qualifies negligent entrustment on
the part of the county Board Of Supervisors, as superiors over the county
government appointed †Vets Memorial Building *Board Of Trustees: under Health
& Safety codes, namely, public endangerment. The board's *refusal to respond
to public inquiries and (1/22/ ‘97’s) acknowledged needed, but strangely
withheld, unrepaired and/or illegally occulted corrections. *The cited
Trustee Boards ensuing engagement of federal government authorities and
jurisdictions on false pretenses. Blaming of this record, for what the Board
Of Trustees and all of their county government superiors are continuingly guilty
of in this tenaciously unresolved, functionally ignored and/or impotently
responded to complaint. To wit: public endangerment and impertinent,
contemptuous refusal (‘If you want security in the V.M.B., you can pray for
it’) to correct, answer-to or satisfy public and private sector originated
formal complaints and inquiries: by the †V.M.B. Trustees. Regarding Health
& Safety code defined violations and negligent entrustment (*under State
senate bill 544) - through refusal by the Board Of Supervisors to cogently
respond to this record's weekly complaints (for 18 months following the
described 1/22/ ‘97 Trustee Board meeting), requesting correction of the
11-1 agreed upon, then tabled security problem. Shortly thereafter including
endemically evident intrusions on this record's federal counselor(s), including
hostile and falsely founded invasionary actions against this records federal
claim. As will be irrevocably if briefly documented in the progression of this
complaint.

Complainant requests that the V.M.B. Board Of Trustees and/or their
superiors also be required to answer his specific questions about whether or not
working and parking security has been established and/or will be established as
policy: on the 2nd floor (Where Board Of Trustee superiors
are on submitted record as having been assured by the Board representatives that
*‘there hasn't been a security problem on the second floor since the Board
Of Trustees was installed’,<late ‘95> - *C. Espinola, 10/ ‘98,
of the county Human Resources Agency. This is a <convened Trustee meeting,
1/22/-‘97> proven, long established, many times repeated and multiplied,
ponderously bold lie. The entire cited county gvt.. chain of command is agreed
to ‘ratify’ it, by making it an ever-enlarging lie; told enough times, by
enough important liars), with regard to secure parking arrangements for
government employed persons working in and around the Vets Memorial Building,
846 & 842 Front Street, Santa Cruz, CA. To date, the only assurance
of V.M.B. security offered to this record is founded in his presumed capacity
for prayer. This official advise, proffered by an unrestrained Board Member at a
convened meeting (1/22/ ‘97), is - among other grievously inflammatory,
distinctively provocative encroachments - in violation of the US. constitution.
Which requires separation of church and state. So far, Mr. Wainscots invocation
of god, prevails.

The sacrilegiously inspired advisory has yet to be gainsaid or alleviated by
anyone. Only further and blasphemously reinforced, extended and capitalized
upon. Trustee Board member and spokesperson, Cy Wannarka, has not to the
knowledge of this formally complaining record been called to account for
anything. Including his Cinco De Mayo, ‘97, noontime intrusion on federal
counselor C.L. Burgor during her agreed upon meeting with this record at that
time; regarding improved security arrangements for her parking accommodations
(acquired for her, by the exclusive efforts of this record and no others): or
his (Cy Wannarka's) unexplained, extra-jurisdictional presence on location of
this record’s federal compensation and pension examination (conducted by Dr.
Joseph - Rule Out PTSD - Keenan), at Palo Alto, 17 July, ‘97. This record
deserves to hear that explanation, also. Mr. Wannarka long ago, repeatedly and
omnipotently declared himself and the Trustee Board he speaks for, ‘autonomous
from all government’ (in those words; repeated by Board member and V.M.B.
Mgr., Andy <'I was only kidding'> Botsford, who has since been promoted,
as coordinator, at the local Civic Center)...

Cy Wannarka is not to the knowledge of this record, called to account to any
other responsible individual or office for anything he and the Trustee Board,
along with county assigned power of attorney Myrna Cherin and V.M.B. Bldg. Mgr.
Andy Botsford, imposed upon public safety and the *complainant of public
endangerment; including their (motives for) interfering with and intruding upon
*this record's federal claim and the duties of the assigned federal authorities.
Since proven to be have blamed the record for what they are: dangerous to the
public - most certainly including federal counselor Burgor. (Who, Board Chairman
Tim McCormick and spokesperson Cy Wannarka with others, persuaded: Mr.
Robertson is overly concerned with his counselors security. Infatuated and/or in
love with her. Trying to take control of her life. When he learns he cant do
that, he may become a threat to her.

This quote will emerge five months later from Dr. Katherine Yoon stationed at
Fort Ord. As will be further explained in below portions of this formal
complaint.) Former Vets Memorial Bldg. Mgr./ Trustee Board member Kelly Smith
was fired (for fictionalized, unrelated reasons) for agreeing with this record
on the issue of public endangerment, through March of ‘97 - months after the
issued meeting of 1/22/ ‘97. Mr. Kelly Smith, as witness to the above
described Board Of Trustees meeting events (and his described punitive firing,
by Cy Wannarka and Tim McCormick) can be reached at (831) 477-1345.

1/27/ ‘97: a matter of days after the cited Trustee Meeting of 22
January, ‘97: During this records federal counseling session between noon
and one PM, Monday afternoon: county employee, James Bindi knocked loudly
on the counseling Rm. 22 door; interrupted this record's federal counseling; to
inform counselor Burgor, who answered the door: 'I wanna talk to Ben! I wanna
talk to Ben!' Whereupon, the record stepped out in the hallway to hear Mr.
Bindi admonish: 'Watch your back! James (‘Pray for security’) Wainscoat
is an ex cop out of Washington, D.C., and he might be C.I.D. (Criminal
Investigation Div). Watch your back!'A physical threat: from
the publicly endangering Trustee Board. An invasion of the record's
federal claim, counseling and counselor. A bold portention of things to come.

James Wainscoat is physically much larger than Robertson, as is Mr. James Bindi;
ostensibly reinforcing and adding to Mr. Wainscoat's original offense(s). That
is to say, Wainscoat was not reprimanded. He was instead, duplicitously
reinforced. By conspiratorially acquired; acted upon information; in the person
of James Bindi, a short time after 1/22/ ‘97. Mr. Bindi has nothing to do with
this record's federal claim, and nothing to do with this record's business with
the county. Was not present at the described meeting. Has since, falsely
proclaimed in a phone call to him about this by this record, that he (Mr.
Robertson) told him (James Bindi) of the trouble at the Vets Memorial Building
Board Of Trustees meeting of 1/22/ ‘97. Mr. *Bindi (Formerly with Naval
Intelligence. Vietnam service. Masters degree in theater), is witnessed by
federal counselor Burgor, and on audiotape, making this counselorship-interrupting
statement, and adding in reference to this record: 'Everything you say, is
s--t'; describing thereby, everything *he says, in this case, under these proven
circumstances. *Assuming that the conspiracy he (Mr. Bindi) has proven himself a
part of, will continue to protect *him and his fellow co-conspirators in county
government, beginning with Art Danner, Emeline Street Chief Psychiatrist, Dr.
John Gillette, McCormick and Robert ('Watch your children when Ben's around'.)
Shippen; as early as '83.

Moreover, Wannarka, has not been brought to task for his methodologically
operative (idiosyncratically familiar) intrusive interception of this record
with his counselor, 5 May, ‘97; at noon. Complainant requests assurance
from the unrestrained county elements at 842 Front Streets VETS SERVICE OFFICE
and the Board Of Trustees, that this veteran and his federal claim will not be
further attacked by Mr. Wannarka or anyone acting under his influence(s) against
this record, who must appear at and immediately next to that office (842 Front
Street) for needed transportation contingent to his federal claim.Mr. Danner's office (is proven as having) released (to the inquiring public,
including John Gose of 116 Maple St. #4) a false report (of felony firearms
assault) against Mr. Robertson, to the public. Also including now federally
employed Dr. Katherine Yoon. Former county employee; former subordinate to
county employed, Emeline Street stationed Chief Psychiatrist Dr. John Gillette.
Dr. Yoon and Gillette routinely doing confidential official business with Art
Danner.

Dr. Gillette is on (3/ ‘86) record, saying of this Danner assigned
defendant: 'Mr. Danner says you're a *pest, and I agree with him.' This
was while Mr. Robertson was required to counsel with Dr. Gillette, in
lieu of Mr. Danner losing threatened my life charges against Mr. Robertson, in
court, 3/ ‘86. Refer *Webster's - pestophile fly swatting - dictionary;
abusive name calling language (the foundation of physical violence) and
destructively employed nuerolinguistic programming - observed to be very
popularly wielded in homicidally accessorial county government circles (As long
as it works, why fix it?) Richard Bandlerism rules. All the way through the
newly installed, Burgor-Yoon administrated VET CENTER @ 41st Ave. & Jade St.
in Capitola (from which Mr. Robertson is functionally ostracized at peril of
physical provocation, attack, threats, restraint, false accusations and charges,
lockdown, etceteras. Because Team Leader Burgor has repeatedly proven - while
simultaneously denying - that she fears Mr. Robertson, physically. Mr. Robertson
cannot relate voluntarily to any woman who so fears him. The Big Bang Gang has
her under MR. CLEAN'S well known spells.).Resulting (6/26/‘97) in a falsely founded and imposed medical hold,
physical restraint, transport and incarceration of this complainant (false
imprisonment at the VA Mental Health Facility in Palo Alto. Mr. Robertson was
represented by congressional liaison, Vets Rep., Hua Kwoon, of San Jose, three
days later. Whereupon he was released due to lack of cause. A matter of
federal record). The ensuing, ongoing functional disintegration of this
complainants federal claim - by federal authorities, Yoon-Burgor, via the
criminally acting influence and authority of the Board Of Trustees, Myrna Cherin,
Andy Botsford, Dr. J. Gillette and Art Danner. (Danner's office is proven,
releasing false reports of ‘felony firearms assault,’ 6/ ‘97. Refer John
Gose, 116 Maple St. #4. Mr. <Nothing to do with it> Danner is falsely
alleged via Vets Administration Dr. K, Yoon to be physically threatened by K.B.
Robertson; and the alleged reason Mr. Robertson was locked down, 6/26/97 - as an
alleged threat to self or others.

This is when Dr. Yoon parroted her diagnosis that Mr. Robertson is overly
concerned with his counselors security, infatuated and or in love with. Trying
to take control of her life. When he learns he can’t do that. May become a
threat to her. This ambush-attack occurred during a regularly scheduled
monthly appointment, 6/26/ ‘97. Ten days after Mr. Robertson saved Floyd
Creager's life (In a ‘no charges, no arrest’ case - 97SC-93336), without
endangering anyone else, with a legally sequestered firearm, as described near
the close of the Judicial, Journalistic & Rogue CIACODE OF
SILENCE In Santa Cruz County, attached...).Mr. Danner is in possession, control of, and/or has destroyed valuable
and life saving property belonging to Mr. Robertson (contingent to a †no
arrest, no charges incident, 6/15/ ‘97. Ten days before Dr. Yoon
was told by Danner that her client was charged with felony firearms assault).
Mr. Danner stole Mr. Robertson's weapon, in *barring its return by the SCPD. in
August ‘97; as described and documented in the records 7/26/‘99 Grand Jury
deposition. And, as proven in referencing Lt. Skeery, SCPD († 97SC- 93336) -
witness to the above theft; which cited thief and (*public endangerer - Mr.
Danner) did not and *cannot show cause. (*Mr. Robertson may be required to save
a life with a firearm, again. Refer 97SC - 93336). Complainant requests return
or restitution payment for the stolen, officially acknowledged life saving
property.
Closing note (more specificity, as required, in the formal complaint
instructions): It is felonious to deliberately destroy evidence (SENTINEL
report, 7/‘90) in an unresolved murder case. The Bandler-Marino case is
categorically - by documented definition herein - unresolved. Mr. Marino; as
Richard Robertson V, is a self established, proven felonious fugitive at large.
Mr. Danner has not only failed to prosecute, but has furthermore, repeatedly and
measurably defended - encouraged the defense of - both of the cited
fugitives. Endemically abusing his power against K.B.Robertson as a matter of
long term, multi-faceted county government policy, via county government
sanctioned authority and representatives, most of whom are directly related to
and connected routinely with Art Danner III. Motivated to disintegrate K.B.
Robertson's credibility, Mr. Danner (& Co.) have only revealed and
disintegrated their own. Without restraint. For decades, thereby making himself/
themselves; likewise feloniously incriminated and likewise fugitive. *The law
being meaningless, when not enforced or represented.Since '83, Mr. Danner has, under his singularly complaining signature,
obliged Mr. Robertson to defend himself, in court - with charges ranging from
threatening his (Danner’s) life (‘87), to battery (‘86), and felony
cultivation of marijuana (10 /‘96), and lost charges against Mr. Robertson:
all five times. In attempting to attack Mr. Robertson's credibility, via abusing
the power of the DA's office, Mr. Danner has only obstreperously managed to
diminish his own credibility while obsequiously proving that (ostensibly
conspiratorial) intention aimed at Mr. Robertson.No informed officials in the area are rustling up anything even vaguely
resembling an investigation or posse on these articles of formal complaint,
herein. The cited officials have authoritatively informed the Grand Jury that
they refuse to be found accountable, charged, or prosecuted. Disintegrating the
Grand Jury of ‘96 - ‘97 altogether. Keeping CC99-102 (this record’s
originally submitted complaint to the Grand Jury preceding this one) from the
knowledge of 15 of 19 Grand Jurists for eight out of 12 months (And, so far,
those are uncontested, mighty damned good odds & ends.)Circumspecting the Bandler-Marino case: Danner and his pliant judiciary
cohorts destroyed - disappeared and otherwise omitted - evidence, witnesses and
testimonies, before and after the illegally arrived upon verdict (1/27/ ‘88);
from a deliberately under informed, misinformed, malinformed (* “kinky sicko /
9 dildo inventoried / 7 daily clients booked/ bi-sexual dominatrix,
high class prostitute”), mesmerized and illegally instructed jury.
(*Prolifically name-called, deceased victim is never called a locally
sequestered rogue C.I.A. cocaine trafficking book-keeper. Which is what
she was and why she was murdered. How and why her - host of - Danner -included,
Chief Prosecutor-protected murderers are free.)The record requests that Mr. Danner, as Chief County Prosecuter
overseeing this unresolved murder case proving Marino is an accessory to the
fact - be charged with dereliction of duty. Obstruction of justice. Protecting
Mr. Marino; assignationally allowing Mr. Fry to generally blunder through the
mockery of a trial. Liberating Bandler and never charging Marino with anything.
As though not charging Marino were an option. As though the Chief Prosecutor had
nothing to do with it. That such option ('We cant prosecute Mr. Marino.') was
taken: cannot be argued. ('We have no evidence against Mr. Marino.' <Our
applauding hands are tied>). A non existent ‘option’ that the law does
not in this case make any allowance for at all.

Dear Grand Jury memberships:
The (attached) 9/7/2000 dated communication from Grand Jury Foreman Dave
Brockmann, proclaims , “It is the understanding of this Grand Jury that the
matter you refer to was presented to the previous Grand Jury. After
consideration, the case was closed. It will not be reopened unless you can
furnish evidence of a more recent occurrence, and/or new data not previously
brought to the Grand Jury’s attention.”

The first of the two above italicized statements completely disregards the 1st
Amendment of the US constitution. That being the right to ‘Redress of
grievances’ (and ‘free speech’). The firstly submitted case (CC99 -102)
was closed without showing any real cause for closure. Instead, the record was
‘reminded’ that the ‘complaint has to be in the Grand Jury’s
jurisdiction.’ Which it - categorically - is.

The record was also advised to confine his complaint to one page - which is not
a requirement at all. Finally the record was told that the submitted complaint
of and since 7/27/ ‘99 ‘does not meet guidelines’; without being
instructed how to meet the so called ‘guidelines’ - which so called
‘guidelines’ are determined by the officials who are being complained
against (refer, ‘conflict of interest’). The second italicized statement
(above; dated 9/7/2000) proclaiming that, the closed case (formerly CC99-102,
now CC00-005) will remain closed until ‘new data’, or a ‘more recent
occurrence’ is presented by this complainant.

Whereas, the first complaint submission was closed without tenable reason.
Keeping it closed on that unreasonable primary premise does not make the
secondary closure more reasonable. On the contrary, two wrongs do not cancel
each other out to make a right. Nor are these complaints any kind of algebraic
issue. All of the above points are made clear in the attached letter (dated
9/30/2000) to congressman Farr.

Whereas, two articles of the existing complaint (murder, and pedophilia) have no
statute of limitations, and, whereas, there is in fact ‘new data’, and a
‘more recent occurrence’ in the re-submitted complaint(s) at issue.

Whereas, the 21 June thru 10 July 2000 SENTINEL coverage of the story regarding
former District Attorney Art Danner ‘squirreling away’ $808,000.00 of state
and federal moneys (intended to benefit single mothers and their children), died
on the SENTINEL conveyed, journalistic vine. The first emergence of said story
occurring 21 June, 2000 and the last - of three - articles occurring in mid
July, 2000. In these three articles, the public is never informed what became of
this ‘squirreled away’ money. Mr. Danner proclaims the issue to be one of a
‘difference of philosophical opinion’, riddling the reader with the
question: ‘To what advantage?’. The issue of ‘to whose disadvantage’ is
never breached. The stolen funds are spun-out to be ‘secreted’, and the
secret is never revealed.

The question of whether or not the missing funds ever reached the persons
intended to benefit from them is left unanswered; unpursued. As though the women
and children for whom the issued funding was intended - and the SENTINEL reading
public (whose tax money is at issue here) - are considerations of no importance.
As though Art Danner is not found concealing massive funds, while brazenly lying
about and trying to blame it on and otherwise find refuge in the incrimination
of the Board Of Supervisors and the County Auditor. Falsely proclaiming that
those authorities knew of the issued missing money, while the entire Supervisory
Board and the County Auditor deny any such knowledge.

Mr. Danner is self revealed as a criminally consummate liar. A bearer of false
testimony; while vainly trying to protect himself at the expense of attacking
innocent citizens and fellow officials. Mr. Danner has a long history of such
insidious prevarications (including elaborately and repeatedly lying to federal
and local officials about this record; as described and documentarily proven in
the submitted complaint - CC-00-005; formerly CC99-102); so far, with complete
impunity.

Mr. Danner behooves the incumbent establishment representatives to introduce him
to his limitations. So far, Mr. Danners endemic abuse of power knows no
limitations. He is proven a close associate of a locally active, rogue C.I.A.,
cocaine trafficking element, that murders, disappears court minutes, omits
witnesses and testimony, with impunity. Refer, THE JUDICIAL, JOURNALISTIC &
C.I.A. INSPIRED CODE OF SILENCE IN SANTA CRUZ COUNTY (as submitted to the Grand
Jurys of 1999-2000, and 2000 -2001): A patently proven, methodologically
practicing prevaricator. A tactically terror invoking tyrant. A patently
manifest functional Fascist.

Major elements of county and federal government are guilty of complicity,
regarding Mr. Danners uncontested attacks on the judicial system - the very
constitution of the U.S. - itself; constituting nothing less than public mayhem.
Uncorrected. Undeterred. Unchallenged. Passively complied with and/or actively
supported. Mr. Danner has endemically and epidemically contaminated the entire
county government chain of command; for decades... With conspicuous impunity. He
is easily the most feared public official in the county. And he doesnt hold this
dubious title without a lot of accessories to the fact. The Grand Jury is duped,
mislead, lied to, evaded (and recently, altogether extinctified) on an annually
rotated basis, by the same county government elements that have been in place,
in many cases, for decades.

Whereas, every story has a beginning, a middle and an ending. This cited
SENTINEL-published story is conspicuously ended right in the middle, without
resolution. Very much as this complaint and complainant has been disposed of.
All of the above is new - irresolutely suspended - information. Constituting a
more recent - unresolved - occurrence, involving nearly a million dollars of
‘misapproriated’ money. Whereas, this complaint case (8/19/2000) was never
justifiably closed in the first place, said closure is now being used as a 1st
Amendment shunning crutch of precedence with which to prop up its continued
closure by the incumbent Grand Jury. Making requirements that have already been
met. Be reminded: these articles of complaint and their continuing dissolutions
are not - despite Mr. Danner’s previously submitted vernacular -
‘philosophical matters of differences of opinion.’

Mr. Brockmann's letter (of 9/7/2000) closes with this offering, Be
assured that your identity will be known only to the Grand Jury. We are sworn to
secrecy to ensure confidentiality of your identity and any information you may
supply us. On the subject of secrecy: it is a fact that information conveyed
to the Grand Jury of 99 - 2000 was kept secret from 15 out of 19 memberships for
a period of eight out of twelve months. Moreover, the complainant has no
interest in any concealment of his complaint or anonymity. On the contrary, the
important example of this very recent story and its portentous contingencies
belongs under the Grand Jury's eyes and back in the SENTINEL, where it was
conspicuously and anomalously discontinued, without resolution.
Whatever the formal outcome of this complaint: its release to the public of
Santa Cruz county is imminent.
Requesting for the submitted reasons a reopening of this ilegally closed case, I
am very sincerely, gratefully and respectfully yours; awaiting the Grand Jury's
withheld response.
- Kent Benjamin Robertson. R.S.V.P.

Regarding: 20 March 2001, Tuesday Meeting with four person Grand Jury
Committee members: Ms. Wong, Ms. Loomis, Ms. Cordova and Mr. Little. 4:PM to
6:PM, 701 Ocean St. (Box 542), Santa Cruz, 95060. Rm. 318’s counseling
cubicle.First, the good news. The four person crime committee (above named) did
reassure the record that the 19 individually packaged and addressed mailing to
all 19 chairs of the Grand Jury, was in fact received by all 19 memberships
(including 5 alternative chairs)
And now the news that is not so good..

"You've inundated us with information." - Ms. Cordova.
"Because I have been inundated (besieged) with (complaint obliging)
information." - The record

"We are not advised by the county government (Board Of Supes, County
Counsel, D.A.'s Office and/or Superior court), as you say (have stated in
writing) we are. We are advised by the state government." - Ms. Cordova,
with the other three committee members nodding their heads.
"Congressman Farr advises you in this letter about a firearms restriction,
to consult an attorney. Why don't you do that (“Why are you burdening the
Grand Jury with this?”, is what this implies.) - Mr. Little.

The record was obliged to explain the obvious to Mr. Little: the report to
Congressman Farr of a ‘felony firearms assault’, by this record, was false.
The federal firearms prohibition certificate was completely void of any real
substance. Based on a totally fictitious, criminally prevaricated and submitted
report from the DA's office, to two federal officials (Dr. Yoon and congressman
Farr). That, the disabled record makes $700.00 a month and cannot afford to
spend money on a lawyer, to prove a negative that is already self-revealed. A
matter of police record - *97SC-93336, refer Chief Belcher, Lt. Sepulveda and/or
Lt. Skeery - A three day ‘detention’, with ‘No charges, no arrest’. Ms.
Wong and the other three committee members received and read the *police
document, above described.

Ms. Wong responded to this evidence by saying: “Well. You did go to jail.”
Yes. It’s called ‘detention’, when there’s no charges and no arrest.
Apparently Ms. Wong doesn’t realize how easy it is for anyone to be jailed.
You don’t have to do anything wrong at all, and still be jailed. It happens
routinely. You can go to jail for doing a provable right, which is exactly what
case # 97SC-93336 proves, categorically (‘No charges. No arrest’). A large
percentage of people who are sent to jail, don’t belong there. By that, the
record means that it is later, and routinely patently proven, that they should
never have gone to jail at all. The police and the courts are fully aware of
this. Jail is often the place that an innocent person is obliged to be detained,
until further investigation proves he doesn’t belong there. It happens all the
time.

In accordance with Ms. Wong and Mr. Little’s ‘reasoning’ here, the proven
false charges should be taken seriously, anyway. Just as the proven endangerment
of the public in the Vets Memorial Bldg. should be ignored, because a covey of
county employed government officials (The Board Of Supervisors, Parks & Recs
Director, Barry Samuel, Human Resources Agency Administrator, Cecilia Espinola)
are coordinately denying and lying about it, after the 1/22/’97 Vets
Memorial Building Board Of Trustees agree, 11 to 1, that there is in fact a
security problem in the Vets Memorial Building. In the views of Mr. Little
and Ms. Wong on these notes, the proven facts should be over-ruled by proven
fictions...

This stonewalling technique combined with methodological denial and
prevarication, revealed throughout the submitted complaint (CC00-005)
documentary as Santa Cruz County government policy,, should be honored, and
extended furthermore. Illusory mental images and lies should preclude
documentary proven factuality.

The record forgot to remind Mr. (‘Why don’t you hire a lawyer?’) Little,
that local attorney, Derek B. Albertsen agreed to take the case - to recover the
weapon Mr. Danner stole from the record; then a short time later, attorney D.B.
Albertsen, in abject, exemplary fear of Art Danner III (Self designated Emperor
Of Santa Cruz County) balked his retainer and advised the record to find another
attorney. The Grand Jury was sent a plethora of documents, including a copy of
D.B. Albertsen's letter to this effect.

Mr. Little also asked if the record had submitted his complaint about Mr.
Danner's many transgressions, to the CITIZEN-POLICE REVIEW BOARD at 915 Cedar
Street. The entire four person committee advised the complainant - this record -
to do this. At the time the record considered it a viable idea.

Since then (3/20/ 2001), the record has learned that the Citizen's Police Review
Board is about litigation between the police department and citizen's who have,
or believe they have grievances with the police department, and/or individual or
collective police officers. This is not the kind of difficulty that the
complaints (dated 19 August, 2000 - CC00-005) are about.

This complainant is happy to be able to say he has no complaints about the SCPD,
whatsoever. Whereas, the subjected Grand Jury committee's suggestion amounts to
an attempt to divert this complainant from the cogent jurisdiction of the Grand
Jury - the four person assigned committee of which, would send him to seek
assistance from the non contingent Citizens Police Review Board. (Word from
reliable sources is that there is a strong, City Of Santa Cruz contingent;
political movement, to extinctify the Citizen's Police Review Board, altogether.
Reminiscent of Mr. Danner's literal extinctification of the Grand Jury, for the
last four months of its '96 - '97 tenure.)

Mr. Little also reiterated the denial of the 18 month belated Human Resources
Agency's response by representative Cecilia Espinola ('There has not been a
security problem on the second floor of the Vets Memorial Bldg. since the <-
proven impotently arrogant -> Board Of Trustees was tokenistically
*installed.’ <*Late '95 - a county - not state - government creation; 'what
was done about' the endemic problems plaguing the county government entrusted
Vets Memorial Building for decades. Refer, state senate bill 544, finding the
County Board Of Supervisors responsible for county jurisdiction activities -
categorically including public security and any public endangerment - in the
County government administered Vets Memorial Bldg.>), and Parks and
Recreation Director, Barry - Temerity - Samuel's audio taped suggestion of 'the
public acting as security for itself', in the staff-abandoned building from noon
to 1:PM every weekday.
..............................

Moreover, consider this documented history: County Vets Service Officer, Cy
Wannarka's 'explanation' to County Human Resources Administrator, Cecelia
Espinola, who wrote the following - verbatim - quoted letter to Mardi Wormhoudt
of the County Board Of Supervisors, dated 19 October, ‘98:

“Dear Supervisor Wormhoudt:
This letter is in response to Mr. Schiffrin’s letter of August 25, ‘98
concerning the complaint of Mr. Ben Robertson about the County Vets Service
Officer (Cy Wannarka and the entire Vets Memorial Bldg. Trustee Board). I
understand from Cy Wannarka, that he did discuss the matter with Mr. Schiffrin
(Supervisor Wormhoudt’s aide) by telephone and the matter appeared to have
resolved itself, so no further action was taken.

“It appears that Mr. Robertson removed his file from the (county) Vets Service
Office on April 8 ‘97, after signing the following statement: ‘I no
longer want the Santa Cruz County Vets Services Officer to represent me for my
VA claim. I am taking my file this date.’

“A copy of the statement is on file with the office. Except for
occasional after hours voice mail messages from Mr. Robertson, he has had no
contact with the Vets Service Office. Because of the nature of the calls and the
fact that Mr. Robertson does not specifically request assistance, the Vets
Service Officer has not responded to the calls.

“Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance in responding
to Mr. Robertson.

From the above quoted letter we may understand that Mr. Wannarka persuaded his
superior, Ms. Espinola, that because the record withdrew its federal claim from
Wannarka’s County Vets Service Office, his ( Mr. Robertson’s) Board Of
Trustee’s meeting - 1/22/ ‘97 - *confirmed complaints of *public
endangerment are no longer binding: as though Mr. Robertson no longer has
citizen complaint rights, ‘because’ he isn’t letting county employee, Mr.
Wannarka misrepresent and sabotage his federal VA claim anymore... This
submitted ‘reasoning’, is transparently unreasonable.

(Mr. Robertson withdrew his claim from Mr. Wannarka’s office: ergo, Mr.
Robertson’s 1/22/ ‘97 proven complaint about public endangerment by the
incumbent Vets Memorial Building Board of Trustees and the entire chain of
County Government command above them, is no longer valid?

What has Mr. Robertson’s withdrawal of his federal claim from Mr. Wannarka’s
county government clutches, got to do with the issued complaint on public
endangerment in a county administered facility? The only point made here by Mr.
Wannarka is one of irrelevant diversion from the issue, passed on to Ms.
Espinola, who echoed Mr. Wannarka’s buffoonery as ‘authority’: as though,
if enough authorities endorse the diversion, it must be germane to - and ‘self
resolve’ - the patently unresolved <Trustee Board acknowledged - then
tabled> *issue <*Including *negligent entrustment of the publicly
endangering Trustee Board, *by the Board Of Supervisors, under state senate Bill
544>. Mr. Robertson fired Mr. Wannarka <on 6 March 2000, not 8 April as
falsely stated above> from working his federal claim, therefore Mr.
Robertson’s complaint about public endangerment in the Vets Memorial Building
is no longer binding? This is not funny. It is dereliction of duty,
misrepresentation of office, and boldly rude abuse of power.)

Mr. Wannarka also persuaded Ms. Espinola that, because Mr. Robertson
communicated with him only via his “occasional after-hours voice mail”, and
“due to the nature of these calls and the fact that Mr. Robertson does not
specifically request assistance, the Vets Service Officer has not responded to
these calls”. This is what Vets Service Officer Wannarka persuaded HRA
Administrator Cecelia Espinola to extend as ‘explanation’, to Supervisor
Wormhoudt, about ‘why’ Mr. Robertson’s proven - unresolved - complaint was
ignored; functionally gagged, for a year and a half, between 1/ ‘97 and
9/‘98, when Supervisor Wormhoudt finally obliged the former elements to
respond to the otherwise completely ignored, stonewalled, re-denied public
security problem...

Mr. Robertson left voice depositions regarding the unresponded to, acknowledged
and then tabled security problem, on Mr. Wannarka’s answering devise, weekly.
For over a year and a half. Ms. Espinola’s letter proves that Mr. Wannarka
(along with Trustee Board member and Building Manger, Andy Botsford), lied to
Ms. Espinola (and Mr. Barry Samuel), enormously - telling her that the record
contacted him only ‘occasionally’. These (at least weekly, over an eighteen
month period) voice depositions were made ‘after hours’, so as not to
intercede on Mr. Wannarka’s time, during working hours.

Mr. Wannarka’s communication to and about this record, via Administrator
Espinola, calls weekly voice depositions for a year and a half,
‘occasional’, and ‘explains’ that Mr. Wannarka ‘did not respond’,
because Mr. Robertson “made no other contact” with Mr. Wannarka, and “due
to the nature of these calls” (a firstly and abundantly denied, then very
reluctantly acknowledged, then tabled issue of unresolved public
endangerment).

Mr. Wannarka’s statement to Ms. Espinola, that “Mr. Robertson does not
specifically request assistance” is a complete - characteristically bold -
prevarication. The record relentlessly inquired of Mr. Wannarka (Weekly, on his
‘after hours’ voice mail), what improvements, if any, had been made, to
correct the (1/22/ ‘97 Vets Memorial Bldg. Trustee Board meeting) acknowledged
security problem (issue) in the building. The public endangerment issue was
acknowledged by eleven out of twelve chairs on the Trustee Board. Then it was
tabled. The Board refused to talk to Mr. Robertson on the issue anymore;
whereupon, Mr. Robertson peacefully dismissed himself from the meeting.
Whereupon, Trustee Board Chairman McCormick resigned that same evening, after
Mr. Robertson’s departure. Mr. Wannarka corroborately refused to respond to -
stonewalled - Mr. Robertson’s ‘occasional’ voice mail depositions, from
that point onward, for 18 months.

Mr. Wannarka has also apparently persuaded Ms. Espinola that after hours voice
depositions are not viable. (What is an after hours answering machine doing in
an office with officers that disregard the import of after hours voice
depositions?)

Furthermore, the only reason Supervisor Wormhoudt finally responded to Mr.
Robertson’s weekly hand delivered, written depositions to the Board Of
Supes, C/0 Ms. Wormhoudt, was, in Supervisor Wormhoudt’s own (Schiffrin-conveyed,
25 August, ‘98 dated, County Supervisor’s letter headed) words, due to voice
depositions left - by this year and a half stonewalled record - on Supervisor
Wormhoudt’s after hours answering devise.

Mr. Schiffrin opens his letter to this record: “I’m sorry I missed your
telephone call (voice deposition) on 24 August, ’98... We had not realized
that you were requesting a direct response in your previous (written and hand
delivered, weekly) correspondence and thought that you were simply keeping us
informed.”

Mr. Schiffrin closes this letter on behalf of Ms. Wormhoudt, saying, “Thank
you for your patience”. Whereupon, Supervisor Wormhoudt then persuaded Mr.
Samuel of the County Parks and Recs Dept, and Ms. Espinola, of the County Human
Resources Agency, to respond to Mr. Robertson’s previously unresponded to -
weekly deposited - written complaints to The Board Of Supervisors, and the
unresponded to weekly voice depositions left on Mr. Wannarka’s after hours
answering devise.

Whereas, the record wrote to Supervisor Wormhoudt personally, as well as the
other four county supervisory chairs - making hand delivered depositions for
over a year and a half, on a weekly basis, petitioning specific actions be
taken by Mardi Wormhoudt and the entire Supervisory Board (obliged by state
senate bill 544 to take responsibility for county government activities in the
Vets Memorial Building), relative to the unresponding Mr. Wannarka and the
unresolved 1/22/ ‘97 acknowledged and then tabled - security problem.

The record specifically and repeatedly requested that the bereft security be
corrected, and that the correction(s) be made known to the complaining record.
Also leaving (‘occasional’) voice mail messages on Mr. Wannarka’s
answering devise, on a weekly basis, also for over a year and a half,
before receiving any response whatsoever, then, that response being the above
letter from Cecilia Espinola, who says that Supervisor Wormhoudt’s assistant,
Mr. Schiffrin, has been told by Cy Wannarka, that ‘the (public endangerment,
building security problem) matter “appeared to have resolved itself, so no
further action was taken.”

Whereas, Building Manager and Trustee Board member, Andy Botsford (‘the little
lady on the couch who has security covered in the Vets Memorial Bldg.’), who
proclaimed to this inquiring record on 3 February, ‘97 (two weeks after the
meeting that established that there was a security problem in the building and
then tabled the issue - stonewalled Mr. Robertson), that she was ‘not allowed
to discuss security matters’ with this inquiring citizen.

Bldg. Mgr. Botsford refused to give this inquiring citizen her name, then
sheepishly did so, saying she was ‘only kidding’; promised to discuss the
unresolved security problem with federal counselor C.L. Burgor; then broke that
promise, saying to Mr. K.B. Robertson - ‘the record’ - when it came time to
reassure Ms. Burgor that she would no longer be endangered with the rest of the
building-accessing public between noon and one PM: ‘If you want to talk about
security in this building, *put it in writing’.

(*A person always has to be careful what they ask for, continued).
A year and a half later, Ms. Andy Botsford wrote Parks and Recs Director Barry
Samuel, that ‘security in the Vets Memorial Building is more than adequate’,
and that the staff is trained in ‘verbal judo’: in the 1/22/ ‘97 dated
wake of agreeing, along with eleven out of twelve other Board members, that
‘there is a security problem in the V.M.B.’, then methodologically cutting
Mr. Robertson off from all inquiries and communications, following the tabling
of the unresolved public endangerment.

Ms. Botsford is on audio tape singing out loud, several bars of the BEATLES
lyric: ‘Mother Superior jumped the gun!’ - then winked at federal counselor
C.L. Burgor - while ascending to the second floor on the Vets Memorial
Building’s elevator, with federal counselor Burgor and this record, 2/3/
‘97: two weeks after the Trustee Board meeting membership, including Botsford,
tabled the (very reluctantly acknowledged, at first abundantly denied public
endangerment) security issue of 1/22/ ‘97. Stonewalling Mr. K.B. Robertson,
and grossly lying to their superiors, thenceforth, as proven in the ongoing
documentary, extracted from - among other sources - county government
letterheads.

Ms. Botsford’s 8 September, ‘98 *dated communication to (*letter from) Parks
& Recs Director, Barry Samuel (*to Supervisor Mardi Wormhoudt), does not
explain how the ‘verbal judo’ practicing staff - or an inanimate ‘video
tape camera that scans the hallways’ (so that a violent crime may be belatedly
witnessed: after the fact) - is going to protect the public from any kind
of danger in the (any given) here and now, or, how a ‘panic button’ that
they are thinking about installing, that would ‘sound an alarm in the
manager’s office’: when the staff, under Botsford’s and Wannarka’s
management, literally makes an OUT TO LUNCH policy of not being in a publicly
accessed building, between noon and one PM. Post Script: Ms. - ‘Wonderful
job doing’ - ‘more than adequately security covering’ Botsford, was
recently promoted by local government elements, to staff the Civic Center on
Church Street.

20 March 2001, Grand Jury Committee meeting with Mr. K.B. Robertson,
continued:
Mr. Little also repeated the threadbare, empty defense of 'autonomy', regarding
the county Vet Service Office or the Trustee Board making no arrangements for
federal counselor Burgor's parking accommodations - a security issue having
nothing to do with whether Ms. Burgor does or does not complain about it ('Maybe
she likes to run back and forth and feed the meter'. - Barry Samuel, on audio
tape, April, '97).

The county employees persuaded Ms. Burgor to make decisions in their favor,
advocating their public endangerment in the Vets Memorial Building. Ms. Burgor
was burdened by the Vets Memorial Building Board Of Trustees - functionally put
in charge of building security - to join them in advocating public endangerment
and the endangerment of herself. Denying it all, after an 11-1 vote had
acknowledged it. The County Vets Memorial Building Trustee Board recruited a
13th chair out of federal ranks. All ‘in the dark’, behind this record’s
back, under the bizarre auspices of blaming their endangerment on Mr. Robertson
and persuading Burgor and her boss, Dr. Katherine Yoon, to medically hold and
lock down Mr. Robertson, on the ‘aversion of danger’ clause activated
premise that K.B. Robertson was guilty of what the county government officials
herein cited, are guilty of.

The documentary fact of the agreement by 11 of 12 Vets Memorial Bldg. Trustee
Board members, at a formal meeting - 1/22/ '97: that 'there is in fact a
security problem in the Vets Memorial Building', and the atrocious history of
this problem, was completely forgotten, put aside, and/or otherwise waffled,
omitted and/or stonewalled, as though it wasn't the history that it
ineradicably is.

There was also, very notably, a general agreement in this four chaired Grand
Jury committee that the 19 August, 2000 dated (eight page documentary) list of
grievances (CC00-005) contained 'too many complaints'; that the complainant
'couldn't realistically expect action to be taken against Mr. Danner' (for
example), about anything. Let alone, everything he is clearly proven to be held
to account - if not indictable - for.

The record was informed by the committee that this expectation 'isn't
politically realistic'... In those words. There it is: the surrender. The green
light on the usurpation - as bully boy policy - of the foundations of democracy
in an exemplary, relatively small California city; Santa Cruz. The Final Nod.

'You have inundated the Grand Jury with information'. A member of the committee
dared say this, out loud, to this complainant (Playing hard ball politics in a
pediatric ward. SAVE THE CHILDREN. Deny every imposition on them and their
mothers - every element of the public that uses Vets Memorial Building
facilities. Steal hundreds of thousands of dollars of tax payer’s money from
them. Let Mr. Danner take the 'philosophically opinionated, non advantageous'
responsibility - “There are no secrets here" - Danner, verbatim.
SENTINEL, 7/2000 , and, "Be assured that the Grand Jury is sworn to (and
swarmed by) secrecy" - Paraphrased, the gagged, Grand Jury.

We have a complaint about the complainant here, he has documented too many far
too solemn and soberingly grievous - wide, deep and long running Judicial,
Journalistic and rogue CIA murders, grand larcenies, dereliction's of duty,
public endangerment's, betrayals of oaths of office, codes of silence, and
massive, locally active cocaine traffickers.

The Grand Jury puts up the white flag when it is overwhelmed - ‘inundated’ -
with such complaints. (the crime rate would plunge to zero, if the public would
quit whining?) The complainant and not the quality of the complaints, becomes
the perceived problem.

(Refer, the American cultural imposition of BLAMING THE VICTIM; particularly in
matters of physical assault and of rape, for example. The fastest growing
violent crimes in the nation. Be it the assault and/or rape of an individual,
community, nation, or constitutionally sacked former democracy. Defending and
upholding the law has become functionally ‘unrealistic’: in your face...).

The Grand Jury is that easily overwhelmed, manipulated, deceived, lied to and
about, diverted and double talked. Apparently, they like to run back and forth
and feed Mr. Danner's ever expiring - '2CRW' tattooed, red Mercedes branded -
parking meters.

The Grand Jury is, by definition, the highest authority in the county, taking
second place to Art Danner's criminally notorious, tyrannical domination of the
county government chain of command. If the Grand Jury is obliged to indict Mr.
Danner and/or the Res. 114-95 creating Board Of Supervisors, for example, it is
time for the Grand Jury to go into internal gridlock behind closed doors about
whether or not to take any 'realistically political' (legally and morally
obligatory) action against Mr. Danner and/or the Board Of Supervisors.

Then, it is time for the (‘96 - ‘97) Grand Jury to make a series of
voluntary resignations and go extinct for the last four months of its twelve
month scheduled - state law required - tenure.. Just say 'no problem', or, 'What
problem?'' Why not extinctify the police and the law? Let the endangered public
secure itself? Accompanied by a gag order, preventing this atrocity from being
revealed to the endangered, betrayed public...

(Mr. Danner's unbeatable system: where crime pays high, undeterred dividends.
In the wake of his success with stealing $30,000.00, and getting caught
counterfeiting time cards to cover it up, And thereafter extinctifying the Grand
Jury of '96 - '97: Mr. Danner, thus supported and encouraged; never having
learned his limitations, since being accessory to the fact in first degree
murder under heinously sinister circumstances, has since, with notably familiar
impunity, stolen $808,000,00 - June to July, 2000, Santa Cruz Sentinel: reported
by District Attorney Ron Ruiz and confirmed by the County Auditor and the five
chaired Board Of Supervisors.)

Mr. Danner has learned - without restraint - and has been meticulously taught,
that, if it works, why fix it? The 'squirreled away' (stolen, secreted)
$808,000,oo is 'a philosophical difference of opinion'. 'To what advantage?' Mr.
Danner has cleverly riddled, while on the - 7/2000 METRO published *DeCinzo
cartoon reflected, griddle <*'a known sleaze bag'>)

The one issue that the above named four person Grand Jury committee agreed on
with this record, is that the county government element contains many
individuals who have been coordinated for years, and in many cases for decades,
to deceive, manipulate, lie to, stonewall - and, if necessary: extinctify - the
annually rotated Grand Jury members; who are at a tremendous handicap for being
on unknown, unfamiliar, politically corrupt and unexpectedly contaminated
ground.

Just about the time that each annually rotated - nineteen member chaired - Grand
Jury starts realizing what their duties are and how to do them, and the fact
that they are routinely and criminally snookered by the cited, exemplary county
government elements: then it is time for that semi-seasoned Grand Jury to
retire, and an unseasoned Grand Jury membership to take its place.

All the while, each deceived, lied to and betrayed Grand Jury is prevented -
'under strict oaths of guaranteed confidentiality' - from revealing their
experiences to anyone outside the Grand Jury.

A very well regulated, guaranteed undeterred Fascist militia is thereby
protected, encouraged and perpetuated. Guaranteed non accountability. Refer: THE
JUDICIAL, JOURNALISTIC & CIA INSPIRED 'Code Of Silence' In Santa Cruz County
'. Very like the evidence in the assassination of JFK, being withheld from the
public, in the name of 'national security', and/or the forensic evidence in the
'86 - '88 Bandler-Marino murder case, being burned in July of '90 - 'To what
advantage?'
Nearly 100 legally innocent people - including 32 children, tortured on network
TV for 51 days and finally burned to death in Waco, Texas: 'committed suicide'
('JFK shot himself'. “Karen Silkwood had a fatal car accident.”).

Welcome to Santa Cruz County - Lucky Star thanking, ‘Nuclear Free Zoned’ -
government: an exemplary leadership cartel that knows how to follow a nationally
trendy political lead... Giving U the GOVERNMENT vs THE PEOPLE business is
business, since JFK shot himself, 22 November, 1963, in Dealy Plaza, Dallas
Texas.

It seems that the executive 'guardians of justice, law and order' in Santa Cruz
County, enormously profit from producing and directing re-runs of variations on
the same criminally dominant themes; casting 19 different actors on the Grand
Jury, annually. With legally imposed gag orders on each member, and each
collective Grand Jury, annually. And those are mighty Hollywood Entertainment
industry proven, damned good, unbeatably systematic odds (Stonewall Jackson,
laughing his rebel caboose off, in Grant's tomb).

If the ongoing Santa Cruz County government cartel has enjoyed the films they've
been scripting, directing, casting and producing together over the passing years
and decades: those same conspiratorially bonded, unbeatably collaborating
elements are going to be collusively nuts, about the book they've collectively
co-authored... ('There's got to be a - pathetically overdue, ignored,
stonewalled, endemically denied - morning after').

The below was sent, with additional formal complaint(s) to the Grand Jury, 3
/ 26 / 2001.
Excerpt from 700 + page deposition made to the Veterans Administration Board Of
Appeals in Oakland, 7/26/97 and the Santa Cruz County Grand Jury, 7/27/ 97. This
excerpt is now deposited with the Grand Jury of 2000 - 2001, dated 26 March,
2001. Complainant K.B. Robertson does not know if the statute of limitations
is expired on this as yet, or not. Apparently it has never been made an issue of
contention. If it has, it’s been ignored or obliterated. If this be the case,
jury tampering - via the omission of germane complaints - is a possibility. In
any case, the fact that it has not become a Grand Jury or public issue draws
suspicion on itself.

Having Exhausted All Allegedly Open Avenues Of Recourse, continued:The functionally invaded and simultaneously abandoned record, being required
since, by the falsely proclaimed 'governmental autonomy' of the Vets Memorial
Bldg. Board Of Trustees (1/22 / '97), to typographically circumscript the
administrative chain of command. Via compoundly interacting municipal, county,
state and federal employees; culminating in this resulting citizen's complaint
to the newly installed (formerly extinctified, in absentia, state law forsaken)
county Grand Jury:

Mr. Arthur Danner III, having also compoundly deprived Mr. Robertson of that
(safety net) recourse, regarding all of this (via the *Grand Jury), in *its only
recently corrected, illegal, state law defying, early 1997 vintaged absence.

That is to say, the record would have submitted a formal complaint to the Grand
Jury, earlier, but there was no sitting Grand Jury in Santa Cruz county to
submit to - for four months, between mid-'96 and mid-'97. Allow 'the record' to
'explain' that.
"For the first time in county history, Santa Cruz county does not have a
Grand Jury, which began having serious internal troubles a year ago, and is now
altogether disbanded. Other state counties have had their internal difficulties
and bumps in the road, but Santa Cruz is the first county in California,
wherein, all of the wheels seem to have fallen off. The serious trouble
culminating in the present and unprecedented disbandment, began about a year ago,"
(Paraphrased) - Santa Cruz SENTINEL, May Wong, 6 April, '97(You picked a fine, excellent time to leave me, loose wheels?)

Note, that the subjected Grand Jury had been extinct for months, before the
SENTINEL did an article on it, three months before its reconstruction and
installation... Note, that no mention is made of Art Danner (who isn't
supposed to have anything, to do with it...); who, with the county Board Of
Supervisors is the most apparent cause of the Grand Jury membership’s
unprecedented gridlock and ensuing series of resignations. Neither again, in
terms of responsibility, is *state senator McPherson subjected.

*State law requires a sitting Grand Jury installation (19 chairs, including 5
alternates) in every county in California, but leaves no instruction or
restrictions on how the Grand Jury is selected, or, by whom. The newly
reinstated Grand Jury was installed on 26 June, '98; drawn in Judge Yont's
(local) courtroom. It was activated on 3 July, '98.

Reliable sources reveal that the dysfunctionalised Grand Jury and/or the Board
Of Supervisors received many formal complaints from the local citizenry about
Mr. Art Danner's theft of $30,000.00; in connection with his firing of former
Asst. D.A., Catherine Gardner, 3/'94.

The Grand Jury, having confidentiality requirements as to what transposed behind
closed doors - apparently gone into what proved to be fatally suicidal political
gridlock, trying to determine whether or not any penalty should be imposed
against Mr. Danner. For his misappropriation of county tax money and
correspondingly deliberate alteration of time cards to cover up the (since extra
judicially euphemised/ Board Of Supervisors 'ratified', $30,000.oo) theft (Res.
114 - '95), and, for the attempted cover-up of all of the above, by Mr. Danner
and the county Board Of Supervisors. All of this formerly covered up information
emerging at a Civil Service hearing, in former (fired) Asst. D.A., Catherine
Gardner's suit against Mr. Danner... (The suit was dropped, when Mr. Danner
capitulated, out of court, as usual, whenever he rips off more than he can
conceal...)

The preceding, 12/6/'94 Board Of Supervisors 'ratification' of the $30,000.00
'misappropriation' - voting 4-1, not to take action against Mr. Danner (Mardi
Wormhoudt being the only dissenting supervisorial vote. Refer: San Jose Mercury
News, 10/17/ ‘94 & Santa Cruz SENTINEL, 12/7-8/ '94). Former supervisor
Fred Keely was putting Mr. Danner's feet to the fire on this issue, whereupon
his efforts were interrupted when he took an extemporaneously appointed seat in
the state assembly. Keely was replaced by Wormhoudt, who abstained from the
ensuing (extra-judicial) ratification ( Res. 114-'95. Illegally proclaiming Mr.
Danner's $30,000 dollar theft with a failed, attempted coverup in the emergence
of counterfeited time cards, to be 'legal'. The 'ratifying' Board Of Supervisors
thereby making themselves accessories to the fact of Mr. Danner's theft and his
failed effort to cover it up...)

Making four out of five supervisors, accessories to Mr. Danner's apparent grand
larceny qualified, time card counterfeiting fact. No charges resulted, but
rather, the Grand Jury of 6/ '96 through 6 / '97 was instead gridlocked into
extinctification by its advisory elements - the county DA's office and the
county Board Of Supervisors.
Ergo: Mr. Danner's ersatz authority is found more important than justice or the
Grand Jury.State law requires a sitting Grand Jury in place at all times. There was no
published or any other response known to this record from any state
authority(ies) - neither the Attorney General nor 15th District State Senator
McPherson. No pursuit of the illegally suspended issue ensued, then, or since...The record was advised by the *committee of 3/20/2001, that it is not
negatively influenced by county authorities, and that it draws its advise from
state authorities. This undoubtedly well intended statement does not corroborate
with the proven extinctification of the county Grand Jury of '96 - '97.
Nullification of said jury being effected by county authorities as described;
without being gainsaid by state authorities - the Atty. General and/or state
senator *McPherson of this district (*directly affiliated with the local
SENTINEL newspaper).The record very sincerely and respectfully thanks all 19 chairs of the Grand
Jury for its attention to this case, which the record asks that this appendage
be permanently included in the Grand Jury files.

Attention please: *Ms. Loomis, Ms. Wong. Ms. Cordova and Mr. Little:
In my submittal of documentary information on paper, 3/20/20001 Tuesday, were
included two documents I have not since been able to locate other copies of.
These two documents I wish to remain on permanent file with this case
(CC00-005). On the other hand, will you please make copies of same and send
them to me. The ones in your possession seem to be the only copies I had.

The subjected documents are the letter from Attorney Derek B. Albertson to
Commander Richard Anderson, and the letter from the Navy/Defense Dept. dated
September, ‘85, proclaiming that do not affirm that my unit and myself was in
the Bay Of Pigs, Cuba, May of ‘61, then going on to say that I do rate the
National Defense Medal, but not the Expeditionary Medal (which, a month later,
October, ‘85, they confirm I did earn, via L.E. Panetta). Thirdly, will you
please forward a copy of the letter from congressman Farr, proclaiming that he
has been informed that 'a local court has issued a federal firearms prohibition
certificate against you'. The fact being, that this letter documents the fact
that federal official, congressman Farr, was enormously 'misinformed' (boldly
lied to) about what is in fact, by documentation in and of the Santa Cruz Police
Department, to be a 'no charges, no arrest' case ( '97SC - 93336).

It is criminal to deliberately submit a false report to a federal official.
Danner did it twice on the same 'felony firearms assault' lie - once to Dr.
Katherine Yoon (6/26/ '97 - a matter of federal record), and once to congressman
Sam Farr, shortly thereafter appearing in a statement on Sam Farr's letterhead
('a local court has issued a firearms prohibition certificate against you'.
Farr's information on what is in fact a 'no charges, no arrest' case).

Post Script: With regard to my submitted complaint about public endangerment by
The Vets Memorial Bldg. Board Of Trustees, and negligent entrustment by the
Board of Supervisors (refer, State Senate Bill 544, as submitted in documentary
deposition to the Grand Jury); which was ignored for 18 months before being
impotently redenied:
Three weeks *after the Board Of Trustees Meeting of 1/22/ '97 (‘There is no
security problem in this building. If you want security here you can pray for
it.’ - James Wainscoat, board member, at that meeting, to this complainant):
the record telephoned and then briefly met with and talked to Bldg. Manager -
Trustee Board member - Andy Botsford in the Vets Hall vestibule; asked her if
counselor Burgor was still being left alone in the publicly accessed building
between noon and 1:PM, and if any action had been taken to improve the very
reluctantly acknowledged - then tabled - security problem (issue) in the
Vets Memorial Bldg.

Botsford responded. “I don’t know if I’m gonna leave Ms. Burgor alone in
this building from noon to1:PM or not.” Adding that she was not allowed to
discuss that with this complainant. The record asked her if she knew what the
fastest growing violent crime is in the United States. Botsford responded: 'I
haven't been reading any criminology books, lately.'

The record stoically reminded the cynically responding Bldg. Mgr. that it is
part of her responsibility and that of the entire Trustee Board to know that the
fastest growing violent crime in the U.S. is the physical abuse - including rape
- of women by men. The record asked Botsford for her name and/or her card.
She replied:
"I don't think Im gonna tell you my name."

When the record reminded Botsford that he would learn her name and hold her
accountable for her flippancy about solemn issues of public endangerment,
Botsford then proclaimed,
"I was only kidding", and gave the inquiring record her card.

The record submits that Botsford's response to the record is a representative
extension of the entire 18 month incommunicado Trustee Board. Parks &
Recreation Director Barry Samuel offered:
'Maybe Ms. Burgor likes to run back and forth and feed the parking meter'.
(Maybe she likes to gamble with being mugged, abducted or worse.)

This is not an issue of personal 'autonomy', as evasively and repeatedly claimed
by all responsible parties. It is a matter of public endangerment.

On behalf of the public of Santa Cruz County, the record petitions a tenable
assurance from assigned authorities of public security in the V.M.B. Such
responsible assurance has yet to be submitted. Only more evasive, threadbare -
already proven false - denials.