Working Papers (INF) Forfattere "Rosenø, Axel"

Introducing Seven New Product Project Types for the Study of Innovation Management

Rosenø, Axel(København, 2005)

[Flere oplysninger]

[Færre oplysninger]

Resume:

Product innovativeness is a key moderating variable for the study of innovation
management (Song & Montoya-Weiss 1998, p. 124). For this reason, some empirical
studies of innovation management examine new product processes, critical success
factors, and market learning practices for incremental versus discontinuous new
product projects (Song & Montoya-Weiss 1998; Atuahene-Gima 1995; Veryzer 1998a;
Lynn et al. 1996; O’Connor 1998; Rice et al. 1998). By looking at both these types of
new product development projects, empirical observations are likely to be more
realistic than those of studies that do not discriminate between more or less
innovative projects.
Even so, a dualistic view of the matter does not capture the nuances (Green et al.
1995)1 of the relationship between product innovativeness and innovation
management practices. Hence, there is a need for richer innovativeness typologies
that go beyond the dichotomous view and, thereby, lend themselves to a more finegrained
study of innovation management practices for different types of new
product projects.
In fact, various innovativeness typologies exist that include more than two product
types. Notably, the typology by Booz, Allen & Hamilton (1982)2 introduces two
dimensions: newness to the market and newness to the company, resulting in six products
types (with various combinations of high, medium and low newness). An alternative
set of typologies differentiates between the product’s technological newness and its
market newness, for example Abernathy & Clark’s (1985) typology with four new
product types; Leonard-Barton’s (1995) five product types; and Veryzer’s (1998a)
four types in a two-by-two matrix.
Interestingly, these two meta-perspectives on product innovativeness (i.e. 1. new to
the market and/or new to the company and 2. technological and/or market
newness) are generally not included within the same typology in extant literature.
For example, discussions of the technological and/or market newness of a product,
often leave out the question of whether that newness is in the eyes of the industry
and market (exogenous newness) or only for the focal firm itself (endogenous
newness). More broadly, it can be stated that "... little continuity exists in the new
product literature regarding from whose perspective this degree of newness is viewed
and what is new" (Garcia & Calantone 2002, p. 112).