Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Yesterday, shortly after the Boston Bombing, I wrote an article entitled, “Early Evidence Indicates Boston Bombing Was A False Flag,” where I acknowledged that the facts were still emerging in regards to exactly what happened on April 15 in Boston Massachusetts. Although I did my best to present the relevant information as it was unfolding, a portion of that material appears to have been muddled in the confusion and fog of information surrounding the immediate aftermath of such an event.

Shortly after the article was posted, some of the questions resulting from the reports I cited (particularly that regarding the Boston Globe tweets and the announcement of “controlled explosions”) were answered.

Considering the track record of government-sponsored false flag attacks, however, the incident has seemed suspicious from the very beginning. This suspicion has been bolstered by the fact that mainstream media pundits are uniting in their promotion of the theory that the Boston Bombing was, in fact, the handiwork of “rightwing extremists” and “anti-tax people.” With the obvious and increasing trend toward a total police state, it is also a suspicious that one result of the attack would be the de facto military occupation of Boston by the Massachusetts National Guard.

Regardless, however, some information which was reported in the fog of the aftermath of the bombings by a variety of alternative media outlets, including myself, such as the existence of a planned “controlled explosion.” After further examination, it has been determined not to be of the significance that it was originally thought.

For instance, in regards to the “controlled explosion” reports, it has been established that the “controlled explosion” was not an event or drill planned prior to the bombings but were, in fact, the detonation of a secondary device which was found across from the JFK library.

In the hours after the event, the reports of a “controlled explosion” were interpreted by some to mean a planned drill and were reported accordingly. This interpretation was bolstered by a Boston Globe tweet which announced the “controlled explosion.” However, in reality, the tweet was only announcing the destruction of the secondary device and was released close to an hour after the initial bombings. As Madison Ruppert of End the Lie writes,

There are rumors circulating social media and blogs claiming that the Boston Globe tweeted that there was going to be an explosion as part of a drill before the attacks took place.

The tweet at issue reads, “BREAKING NEWS: Police will have controlled explosion on 600 block on Boylston Street” and was posted at 12:53 PM Pacific.

The first tweet from the Boston Globe about the bombings reads, “BREAKING: A witness reports hearing two loud booms near the Boston Marathon finish line.” It was posted at 11:57 AM Pacific.

Put simply, the “controlled explosion” tweet was 54 minutes after the tweet about the two bombings.

But, while those of us who may have reported this information improperly have a responsibility to retract it, it is also true that there are numerous aspects regarding the Boston Bombings and the JFK library explosion/fire which are still quite suspicious.

While an explosion was indeed reported by police at the JFK library and subsequently published as such by the New York Post, it was later reported that the incident was nothing more than a fire that was unrelated to the initial bombings.

Not only that, but the fact remains that the University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach, Ali Stevenson, stated that bomb sniffing dogs were present at both the start and finish lines, a highly questionable circumstance if the bombings were not known to be set ahead of time, at least to some extent.

Speaking to Local 15, Stevenson stated, “They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about. It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill.”

It should also be noted, however, that, in another report, the text of Stevenson’s statement was changed. Again, as Madison Ruppert writes,

Despite erroneous claims on social media, WPMI Local 15 did report that a coach from the University of Mobile said that there were bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines and law enforcement spotters on rooftops at the start of the race.

According to Ali Stevenson, who says he raced in marathons in Chicago, Washington, D.C., London and other major cities, that level of security is unusual.

It is important to note that the text of the report has been changed. Originally, it included a quote from Stevenson saying, “It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill.”

Stevenson told Local 15 that authorities told participants that it was just a training exercise, according to the new report which lacks the word “drill” entirely.

“They kept making announcements to the participants do not worry, it’s just a training exercise,” Stevenson said.

“Evidently, I don’t believe they were just having a training exercise,” he said. “I think they must have had some sort of threat or suspicion called in.”

Regardless of whether the issue surrounding the “controlled explosions” and Boston Globe tweets have been settled, there are clearly plenty of reasons to suspect that the Boston Bombings were, indeed, false flag attacks. However, while some evidence may point in this direction, it would be wise for all of us – observers, activists, alternative media outlets, etc. – including myself, to slow down, take a look at the facts for what they are and make our judgments accordingly.

Brandon Turbeville is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor's Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of three books, Codex Alimentarius -- The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, and Five Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident. Turbeville has published over 200 articles dealing on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville's podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV. He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com.

Neither anti-tax protesters, nor violent "patriots" would target the American people under any circumstances whatsoever. Why create enemies of the common folk whom they staunchly support? One could imagine such actors hitting an IRS building or some such symbolic target, yet they haven't and won't even do that. Local activists and even rightfully aggrieved foreign "terrorists" know better than to "poke the bear" and give it an excuse to attack. That is my proof that this can only be a false flag to bring the DHS and the control matrix more commonly into American's daily lives. Bigger budgets, more toys, buttressed egos - for these things citizens are traumatized, murdered and imprisoned. Unbelievable? Watch the next moves.

Another thought: Where are any films by bystanders taking shots of the finish line? By rights there should be dozens. Any security cameras, police cameras? The footage so far is inconclusive and unclear. Scenes could have been inserted, faked or omitted as they are only coming from MSM that I've seen.

My condolences to the many people affected by this travesty. But lives, limbs and innocence lost will be better served by realistic investigation.

Disinformation is already at work on this one. First there were other bombs found, then they were not really bombs, but bomb squad detonated them any way? How does that work? I will wait for more reliable info. Something doesn't seem quite right in the reporting. My heart goes out to the victims and their families.

9-11 was a false flag to put the Nazi Enabling acts called the Patriot Acts into force. Obama put the NDAA and the NDRP acts in by executive order. I think they will be making pressure cookers illegal next.

If it is anti-tax extremists as implied by mainstream media, then 'said' media should suggest [that] government capitulate and give in to the demands of the anti-tax faction and abolish taxation... Sure, in a better world.

This just goes to show the American people that the MSM (AKA: Corporate controlled "Media") will go to any lengths to push their agenda and opinions! I do not understand how they can say who they think might of done this horrible act of terrorisim because it happened to occur on tax day or patriot's day. It seems that accusing certain groups and pointing fingers is the last thing our so called "free press" should be doing in America. What ever happened to investigative reporting or maybe, the truth? Oh...wait a minute, I forgot that the news of today is only the repeating of opinions by talking heads! The real reporting days of true journalisim are long gone now. What a shame it is that we cannot trust what is reported by most "news" outlets anymore.

Remember: They only tell us what the elite masters in charge want us to know. Reality is something for them to control and mold into whatever they want. Think for yourselves people! It is not illegal....at least not yet.

9/11 Questions

Activist Post is an Independent News blog for Activists challenging the abuses of the establishment.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the stories on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Paid advertising on Activist Post may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.

All opinions expressed by contributors to this site are theirs and theirs alone.