From Dee Nicholson [dnicholson@yaknet.ca]My nurse friend sent this and encouraged me to post it and spread the word. I agree.

If everyone can remember something this simple, we could save some folks. Seriously..

Please read:

STROKE IDENTIFICATION:

During a BBQ, a friend stumbled and took a little fall - she assured everyone that she was fine (they offered to call paramedics) .She said she had just tripped over a brick because of her new shoes.

They got her cleaned up and got her a new plate of food. While she appeared a bit shaken up, Maria went about enjoying herself the rest of the evening.

Maria's husband called later telling everyone that his wife had been taken to the hospital - (at 6:00 PM Maria passed away.) She had suffered a stroke at the BBQ. Had they known how to identify the signs of a stroke, perhaps Maria would be with us today. Some don't die. They end up in a helpless, hopeless condition instead..

It only takes a minute to read this....

A neurologist says that if he can get to a stroke victim within 3 hours he can totally reverse the effects of a stroke.....totally. He said the trick was getting a stroke recognized, diagnosed, and then getting the patient medically cared for within 3 hours, which is tough.

RECOGNIZING A STROKE

Thank God for the sense to remember the '3' steps, STR . Read and Learn!

Sometimes symptoms of a stroke are difficult to identify. Unfortunately, the lack of awareness spells disaster. The stroke victim may suffer severe brain damage when people nearby fail to recognize the symptoms of a stroke.

Now doctors say a bystander can recognize a stroke by asking three simple questions:

S *Ask the individual to SMILE.T *Ask the person to TALK and SPEAK A SIMPLE SENTENCE (Coherently)(I.e. It is sunny out today.)R *Ask him or her to RAISE BOTH ARMS..

If he or she has trouble with ANY ONE of these tasks, call emergency number immediately and describe the symptoms to the dispatcher.

New Sign of a Stroke -------- Stick out Your Tongue

NOTE: Another 'sign' of a stroke is this: Ask the person to 'stick' out his tongue.. If the tongue is 'crooked', if it goes to one side or the other, that is also an indication of a stroke.

A cardiologist says if everyone who gets this e-mail sends it to 10 people; you can bet that at least one life will be saved.

I have done my part. Will you?

From Phil Segrave [psegrave@yadtel.net]You are preaching to the choir on the drugging of school children scandal. Ritalin shrinks the brain and sets many up for a predisposition for illegal drugs later.

School systems are set up on the federal grant carrot/stick programs. They must meet quotas to get a percentage of the student population on these 'behaviour modification' drugs, or risk losing federal assistance to enhance their budgets.

Through 'no child left behind' type legislation, the schools are required to have mentally challenged children 'diagnosed' by organization representatives who directly or indirectly depend on their jobs paid by big pharma.

Medical doctors go along with what the drug company sales reps tell them, plus they are programmed by the medical schools that trained them to treat, not cure diseases.

I am bring this information to your attention and to every-one on my email list, in the hope that 1st you read it, and then pass it on, to every friend of yours that have small children...

How much do you trust your doctor with the health of your child?

I expect like most of the masses you would say 100 per cent.

Well I think the information printed below, should just wake you up from that false reality...

All the information come from a book called “Human Race get off your knees” by David Icke (and no, he is not a nut case, as made out to be by the media, because of this sort of research)

Just OPEN your mind, read and decide for YOUR self.

“Here is a staggering statistic.. One in ten American children take the mind-altering drug Ritalin, and other researches put it around one in eight. Pause for blood breath. WHAT??Ritalin is a derivative of Cocaine.What is happening to children across the world is the most obvious example of the Totalitarian tiptoe, and these figures for Ritalin consumption show how far it has gone.

Some more extraordinary numbers.

Here in the UK,

UK doctors wrote 3,500 prescriptions for Ritalin in 1993UK doctors wrote 26,500 prescriptions for Ritalin in 1996UK doctors wrote 250,000 prescription for Ritalin in 2006UK doctors wrote 461.000 prescription for Ritalin in 2007 “

Now doubt, it has trebled again since then (my words not the book JG)

Plus there are many other drugs like Ritalin on the market called copy-cat drugs.

Another drug given to children is Risperdale, which was used on political prisoners in the Soviet Union to extract information.

Some of these drugs are given to children as young as 2.

ADHD is caused by food additives. Aspartame and MSG being the main 2 but many more as well.

The research is out there to prove that there is no such thing as ADHD, it is a made up illness, the side effects of the additives, colours and Junk food.Be very aware with soft drinks, fruit juices, crisps (nearly all crisps contain MSG) just check the labels.

Pass this on to all your contacts- Maybe people can really start to make a change or the next generation of children, will all be brain damaged and drug addicted.From Dee NicholsonDear Sirs:

During my school and university years, I was not taught things that I should have been taught.I am also sure that you weren't taught these things either.

In the course of my research, I have discovered things (listed below), that are not carried out as they should be. Maybe it is my interpretation, so I am asking you to give me your knowledge of all the points listed below.

1. The B.N.A. Act 1867, from the House of Lords does not have Queen Victoria's signature nor her seal. It has three initials and nothing else. Question – how legitimate is this act that the Supreme Court of Canada says it is the rule of the land?2. Section 2 of the BNA Act had been repealed, so after 1901 there are no heirs.3. The Bank Act of 1913 is another topic which I will not go into this time.4. In 1917 the federal government properly legislated the Income War Tax, as a necessity to cover war costs. Is this true or false?5. In the Hansard on page 3117 it says that the war costs were met, meaning paid in full. Also $600,000.00 was paid to the railroad. Is this true or false?6. In the Debates House of Commons Volume III, 1926, page 2703, “I say emphatically that the special war taxes now collected by this country exceed by many millions the sum required to take care of war expenditure, and in so far as income tax is applied to purposes other than special war purposes it is ultra vires of the parliament of Canada, parliament having no power to impose direct taxation for anything other than war purposes. (italics mine). Is this statement true or false?7. So, if the war costs were paid in full in 1920, why did the federal government continue to collect the Income War Tax until 1948?8. What is the word to describe points 6) and 7) ? Would you call it “fraud”? The federal government states the income tax is ultra vires.9. In 1931 The Statute of Westminster gave us our Independence. Is this true or false?10. In 1931 the P.M. was R. B. Bennett. What should have been done by R. B. Bennett and he did not do? What can be done now to correct R. B. Bennett's omission for us to be independent?

11. As of 1931 the Statute of Westminster gave us our independence does that mean we are not part of UK? We are not a colony? Is this true or false?12. In 1934, Canada was incorporated in Washington, D.C. Is this true or false?13. Why was Canada incorporated in 1934?14. As Canada is a corporation, corporations are not governments. Then Wal-Mart, Canadian Tire, Home Depot and other corporations are governments also. Wouldn't you say so?15. What is the role of the Receiver General? Why do we need the Receiver General?16. In 1947, Letters Patent under King George VI were transferred to P.M. MacKenzie King. MacKenzie King's signature is on the Letters Patent, but NOT King George VI. Shouldn't King George VI's signature be on the transfer papers as well as McKenzie King's? Archives in England shall be searched.17. De facto Head of State is removed from the Role and Responsibility of Governor General. Why was this removed?18. De facto is illegal, illegitimate contrary to de jure means rightful, legitimate, just, or constitutional.19. If the Governor General is de facto who possess title but is illegal, illegitimate; she has no power to do anything, such as give Royal Assents to bills, or give permission to Parliament in the Throne Speech . Question – so why do we have a Governor General and pay her an exorbitant salary plus all the luxuries, travel first class, etc., when that money could be put to better use such as homes for the homeless?20. If the Governor General is de facto, has no power, then the Throne Speech, the Royal Assents are meaningless. All the bills and acts read to the Parliament in the Throne Speech, and all the acts and bills that were given the Royal Assent by the de facto Governor General are null and void. Isn't this true?21. In 1948, there were 2 income taxes. The Income War Tax and a newly created 1948 Chapter 52 Income Tax. Try and get a copy of this 1948 Ch 52 from the archives and see what happens. You won't get one, nor will you get a reply. There isn't one.22. The Income Tax Act in use now is the CCH copy or Stikeman copy. These are private publishers with copyrights and disclaimers in them. They definitely are not from the Queen's Printer.23. The 1985 Revised Statute of the Income Tax Act refers to RS 1952 ch 148. The RS 1952 ch 148 refers to 1948 Chapter 52. Is this correct?24. To revise bills/acts there shall be an original to revise. If there isn't 1948 chapter 52, then there is nothing to revise. 25. The Governor General's Throne Speech did not give permission to create a new income tax act. It said to revise the act. The act at that time were tax rental agreements with all provinces.26. The 1948 ch 52 does not have Royal Assent.27. The 1948 ch 52 is not in the Canadian Gazette.28. Wouldn't you say that 3 strikes and you are out? Well, 23), 24), and 25) are the 3 strikes.29. Just found out that the Canada Custom and Revenue Agency (a.k.a. CCRA), now are Canada Revenue Agency (a.k.a. CRA) are registered in Puerto Rico, a USA firm. Is this true?30. Can't the federal government get Canadian companies to do their collections of the “ultra vires” tax?31. The Income Tax Act states that it is “voluntary”. Is this true or false?32. Another question comes to mind – what authority do the MP's have to increase their salaries, create pensions for themselves without going to the people in a referendum?33. MP's paying themselves constitutes a “Conflict of Interest”. You are the employees not the employers. Wouldn't that be stealing from your employer?34. What gives CRA authority to make policies and enforce them?35. Why do we need judges when CRA can get the Court Clerks to sign a piece of paper called “Certificates”? These certificates look like judges' orders. If an individual does not know the difference they think they are judges' orders. 36. There are other questions I can ask, but I think this is sufficient for now.

I expect answers to my questions within 30 days. Otherwise I will have to go searching for answers elsewhere.From Phil Segrave [psegrave@yadtel.net]From Elliot Cohen:

THE INTERNET NEUTRALITY FREEDOM ORGANIZATION (INFO) HAS JUST BEEN ESTABLISHED ON FACEBOOK. ITS AIM IS TO STOP BIG ISPS FROM DEMOLISHING THE FREE AND DEMOCRATIC ARCHITECTURE OF THE NET.INFO MISSION STATEMENT:The giant Internet Service Providers such as Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon seek to:

1. Abolish the flat service fee. This means that you will pay for the amount of time you spend on the Net and the amount of data you download. For example, you will be charged for downloading a video from You Tube. If you don't have much money to spend, you will have less access to information than a person who has more money.

2. Make website operators pay for bandwidth. This means that companies with deep pockets like Fox and MSNBC will connect quickly whereas small website operators who can't afford the high costs will operate "in the slow lane." The Net result will be an Internet that will become much like cable TV. You will get only the information that the big media companies (and their governmental affiliates) want you to get. You will get a lot less, and you will pay a lot more for less.

These ISPs have now gotten the legal green light to go ahead with their plans and they WILL do so very shortly unless something is done to stop them. This is where you come in. The mission of INFO is to organize and plan peaceful cyber-protests, create petitions, and engage in other forms of constitutionally protected free speech and grass roots efforts aimed at preserving an open, free, and democratic Net. In particular INFO stands against the attempt by these giant ISPs to block, slow, censor, or otherwise restrict legal Internet content and Internet access.Media contact: elliotdcohen2@gmail.com

From Eileen DannemannWe have an opportunity here not only to support a great and courageous hero in our hearts, but we can do something more. We can put Dr. Wakefield's book, Callous Disregard, on the BEST SELLERS LIST.

From Phil Segrave [psegrave@yadtel.net]If phosgene is the culprit, a straw man leaker could be planted to throw serious consideration off. Remember how Dubya's military record scandal was thrown off by the a whistle blower with a suspicious past was the 'source'? They fired Dan Rather over that one. The media pounced on the whistle blower's creditbility, and ignored investigating Dubya's military record.

When the social engineers and spin doctors think a story might break, it is a classic info poodle trick to plant a straw man with a clouded past as the source. The info poodle's would tear Colleen Thomas's credibility apart and ignore the phosgene story. The memory of Dan Rather getting canned would put the fear of God into any broadcaster and/or journalist that would otherwise cover the story.

From Phil Segrave [psegrave@yadtel.net]It is reassuring to get positive feedback. Please pass this message to your friends and family. The more this possibility get into the discussion arena and people start networking the concept, the quicker the world will find a resolution. Each and everyone of us can play a vital part in this regard. Then the professionally qualified researchers will take it more seriously because of public demand.

Maybe some media will give the theory air time and/or attorney general will get an investigations started world wide. All they have to do is 'independently' lab test the remains for phosgene residue to validate or rule it out. The method of deployment (HAARP or chemtrails?), the point of origin and who is responsible would be the next steps. It is important to get this message out and support further inquiry because investigators may not discover phosgene is the causal agent if they do not specifically look for it.

Once phosgene is determined conclusively to be the cause of the die-offs, investigations into HARPP's research into beaming gas to energy by satellite should not be ruled out of consideration, plus an investigation into the logistics of supplying the material for chemtrail spraying could be a productive lead also. Scientists and accountants (researching the paper and money trail) could determine the point of origin.

Phosgene, or a derivative chemical agent, certainly has all the prerequisite characteristics for being a WMD that would fit this air/water killer profile, that is a scientific fact. Fast kill for birds and fish (in relatively high concentrations); slow kill for people (in relatively low concentration).

For the public, the primary cause of illness and death would not even have to be phosgene, given that it can diminish the immune system to the point of making people vulnerable to pneumonia and the flue!

Phil

From Eileen DannemannFOLKS: This is it. This is our time and opportunity. We urge everyone to buy several copies Dr. Andrew Wakefield's book "Callous Disregard".Send Callous Disregard to the top of the Best Sellers list. Buy one for yourself and one for your pediatrician, a media person, a book reviewer, the editor of your local newspaper. Buy a bunch for your office. Andrew Wakefield is our hero...he needs us now!

Do you want to know what may be the cause of the mysterious bird and fish die offs? HAARP could kill the birds with electro magnetic energy, but could that technology kill fish? What could kill both birds and fish? Answer: Phosgene.Phosgene can be liquified, transported and sprayed into the air which becomes a gas that settles to the ground and water. If the concentration is high enough, it can cause organisms with corresponding metabolisms and surface area body weight ratios to die quickly. Once phosgen contaminates sources of water such as rivers and larger bodies of water, it desipates and decomposes into hydrochloric acid and carbon dioxide.

This weapon of mass destruction was used in WWI instead of clorine, because of the delayed presentation of symptoms causing the victims to breath more poison which resulted in higher debilitation and casualty rates.

Is there a secret slow kill depopulation program being conducted worldwide?

Research on the characteristics of phosgene indicate that a deriviative of phosgene, or similar agent, could kill birds and fish, so phosgene as a possible causal agent is based on science, not theory. Conclusive evidence that phosgene is the causal agent and, if so, how it is being deployed remains unanswered.

Scroll in ten minutes in the second audio clip to hear Alex Jones describe the documented secret biological and chemical tests the government has conducted on civilians. About the 3 minute mark in the third audio clip, Alex Jones and Dr Nick Begich discuss Tesla technology research HAARP has alledgedly be doing on converting natural gas into energy and beaming it to a satellite and back to earth to a specific location. Could a weapon such as phosgene be use this way?

From Dee NicholsonHe's right, you know... we are a force to be reckoned with, and they don't want to reckon with us. The people need to know this goes beyond the scientific. It is our RIGHT to choose our natural health care, and it is the RIGHT of others to choose conventional medicine if they wish. If we campaign for that RIGHT, instead of a battle of the medicines to prove which is better, we can win that fight, because we will draw support from both sides. That is a field-levelling master stroke... thanks, Jon....https://www.newswithviews.com/Rappoport/jon130.htm