Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:

Password

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:

Confirm Password:

Email Address

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:

Log-in

User Name

Remember Me?

Password

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Additional Options

Miscellaneous Options

Automatically parse links in text

Automatically embed media (requires automatic parsing of links in text to be on).

BTW #360 BBC heads are not "peanut Port" they are small oval.
Apples to oranges.They still suck as bad as PP heads though.
With flow that low, and no significant increase from .500 lift to .700 lift , unported of course...it just doesnt add up.

10-06-2013 05:19 PM

jokerZ71

Arless,when post incorrect info wether intentionally,or,even just from not knowing any better,someone here is gonna call ya on it.Even if not necessarily incorrect,but,anything contrary to what makes good sense.Some of your posts have been,for lack of a better word,unbelievable.Not everyone has to agree & often times we don't.Some of us have different ideas & can think outside of the box.However,when you make the claims,you should be able to back it up somehow,someway.You don't offer anything except wild exaggerated claims & then seem to get upset when someone questions you,or,asks you to validate or show some proof.It seems that you have some type of simulator program your playin with & posting the results here as actual builds & experience.IDK.These builds prolly only exist on your hard drive.If that's the case.Either your program needs some tweaking,or,data entry needs to do a better job.IDK for sure,but,I think it would be a safe bet to say that the JY 8:1 CR 500+ HP 454 you claim to have had dynoed & goes 8 seconds in your Chevelle is really exists on your computer since several ppl requested dyno sheets,time slips,etc,but,got nuthin except an attitude from you.If I had built that motor,i'd have proof posted everywhere.I apologize in advance if you prove me wrong.

[QUOTE=arless;1816017] let it go man you act like your still a kid over nothing that concerns you. [QUOTE]

Being a Moderator there is plenty to concern me. I am no kid.

Youre messin with fire
Lose the attitude sonny.

10-06-2013 04:28 PM

arless

Quote:

Originally Posted by LATECH

Relax....
No one is dissin you. He merely said "I Think" ... Not... "You are" if you read it correctly.
That does'nt translate to "You are incorrect".
You are getting uppity for no reason.
Allways room here for a healthy debate.
Besides the flow on those heads looks weak for a 500 HP mill. Just sayin.

let it go man you act like your still a kid over nothing that concerns you. The flow of a head and a cam profile go hand in hand. Small heads bigger cam higher rpm. More head flow less cam timing.John lenginfelter made over 600 hp from peanut port heads. Using a 502 bbc. He opened up the intake port to match a single plane intake. With a gradual neck back down to the pp's size. Added bigger valves. Thats it to the heads. So 500 plus hp with a 454 is nothing new.

10-06-2013 03:16 PM

techinspector1

Quote:

Originally Posted by arless

I do not like sarcasm for help, I don't need help that talks to me like he talks to me.

You're ugly and your feet stink and I don't like the way you hold your mouth when you talk. Try that on for size.

10-06-2013 02:30 PM

LATECH

Relax....
No one is dissin you. He merely said "I Think" ... Not... "You are" if you read it correctly.
That does'nt translate to "You are incorrect".
You are getting uppity for no reason.
Allways room here for a healthy debate.
Besides the flow on those heads looks weak for a 500 HP mill. Just sayin.

10-06-2013 12:44 PM

arless

sarcasom

I do not like sarcasm for help, I don't need help that talks to me like he talks to me.

10-06-2013 05:35 AM

LATECH

Vinnie is being helpful. Havent you ever heard of the "Devils Advocate" ?
Lose the attitude and learn something. He is not badgering you, he's trying to help.

10-06-2013 05:27 AM

arless

500 hp peanut port heads.

If you l@@k I,ve already answered this same question

10-06-2013 04:38 AM

arless

Quote:

Originally Posted by vinniekq2

I think your mention of 1 3/4 header pipes is not correct,same with 2 1/2 collectors
Could you show the math on getting 500 HP from peanut port heads? which ones?how many CFM in stock peanut port heads?
are you sure those cam specs are correct for a mild engine?
why is the full spark advance in at 2200 rpm?

How high a compression ratio can you run with the sunoco 94 with normal distributor advance settings? ( I remember guys putting sunoco 260 in their volkswagen beetles for more imagined power,later burning the valves of course)

The engine was probably was getting close to burning a valve anyway maybe running lean and then you ran the sunoco 260. TheY AIN'T going to say nothing!?!? Your are not the only one that has gotten shafted. so I hope you get something for your misfortune

10-06-2013 12:23 AM

vinniekq2

mistakes

Quote:

Originally Posted by arless

The peanut port heads will support over 500 hp withe right parts, thats without any port work. Only a casting flash clean up on the ports. A pro comp air gap dual plane or a Edelbrock air gap performer rpm. A good cheap cam would be a summit k-1303 w 540 lift 238x248 duration at 0.50 lift 114 lobe seperation. good aluminum 1.7:1 ratio roller rockers. 5/16 harden push rods, 9.0:1 compression. Headman 1 3/4" primary pipes, 2 1/2" collectors and pipes with good free flowing with turbo mufflers. HEI distribiter with mechanickal advance all in by 2200 rpm. No vacuum advance. 65000 volt coil. over 500 hp at 5500 rpm, and over 550 ft lbs torque at 4200 rpm. This is all computer estamated given the parts used. So I threw in all the part's that I thought would make 500 hp and sure enough after a couple of different combos with computer hep made the said power. So that artical in super chever with the 446 hp at 4900 rpm is a bad *** street engine no matter how you slice it.

I think your mention of 1 3/4 header pipes is not correct,same with 2 1/2 collectors
Could you show the math on getting 500 HP from peanut port heads? which ones?how many CFM in stock peanut port heads?
are you sure those cam specs are correct for a mild engine?
why is the full spark advance in at 2200 rpm?

This thread has more than 15 replies.
Click here to review the whole thread.