Q: As a fan of the great outfield we had at the end of the year. Are the Nationals considering trading Adam Eaton if they resign Bryce Harper?

A: Indeed, an outfield of Soto, Eaton, and Harper is pretty awesome, if (biiiiig if) all are healthy and producing at optimal levels. And the on top of that we have a top-5 prospect in all of baseball Victor Robles who no longer can be kept in the minors. So that’s four solid players who all would start for any team in this league on one team. So what do we do?

Well … only one of these four guys is a Free Agent: Harper

And, only one of these guys is projected to make a ridiculous, franchise altering amount of money in free agency: Harper.

Harper has played for 7 nearly full-seasons: he has a total bWAR figure for his career is 27.4. That’s an average of 3.9 bWAR per season. Yes he had a monster 10 win season in his MVP season of 2015, but he’s also lost huge portions of several seasons to injury. And that has to be part of the conversation when you consider whether you commit $200M to him for the next 7 years.

For me the answer is easy. Juan Soto will make the MLB minimum (or near to it) next year; call it $600k. He generated 3.0 bWAR in 116 games, which projects to a 4.1 Win season with 162 games. I’d rather pay Soto $600k to give the team the same expected level of production as Harper would for 30-TIMES more money. You let Harper walk, you go to war in 2019 with Soto in left, Robles in center, Eaton in right, finally have three outfields all in the “right” positions defensively, and then deal with a 4th outfielder from internal candidates.

NOW. Letting a tranformative player like Harper go is … well its an “above the GM” decision. Not only because of the impact on payroll, but because of his role with the team. He’s a massively marketable star, transformative not just for the team but for the sport of professional baseball. His $30M/year salary (or whatever he wants) is not just about payroll; you can’t put a price tag on the marketability of a player of his stature and what it means for the team. He puts “butts in the seats.” He is in national commercial ad campaigns. He’s a foil (for better or for worse) across the sport. Do you just let a guy like this walk? They’re getting basically *nothing* back for him (a compensation pick between the 4th and 5th rounds, thanks to the criminally poor job the team did in managing the luxury cap over the last two years), so that barely factors into the discussion.

Now, lets say, for the sake of argument, that the team does re-sign Harper. Yeah for me, if you re-sign Harper, you’re going to have to move either Eaton or Robles. So … which do you move? Eaton, like Harper, has been just crushed by injury the last two years, producing a fraction of his value the 3 years prior. So even though he’s still quite affordable, trading him this off-season would be trading pretty low. Robles is still the unknown; yeah he’s an amazing prospect, but is he going to have a Juan Soto-like 2019? Robles can be the centerpiece of a trade that could return a significant player in an area of need for this team (mid-level Starter or quality starting Catcher). Would you prefer to go that route?

For me; i’m on record. I want to part ways with Harper, field a starting OF that costs less than half of a one-year Harper salary figure and allocate his projected payroll towards other areas of need.

Collier echos my concerns about trading Eaton low, but also notes that … well this is THE decision that the team faces, probably the biggest one in a decade. We can’t know until the Harper decision is made.

Q: What’s Michael A. Taylor’s future with this team?

A: For me, despite Michael Taylor‘ awesome 2017 season, he’s reverted back to form. He’s a 4th outfielder. Great defensively, poor offensively. Can play all three OF positions, plays CF excellently. But he still strikes out 33% of the time and cannot be trusted. After his 2018, its not like he has real trade value, and he’s now also arbitration eligible so he’s not exactly cheap. Is he a non-tender candidate? Probably not, but assuming the team goes with my plan of letting Harper walk and going with a starting OF of Soto-Robles-Eaton, then for me Taylor is an ideal 4th and competes in the spring with Andrew Stevenson for that role. He should win it, then be coupled with a corner-OF bench bat type who can play LF in a pinch.

Honestly, you learned everything you needed to know by looking at the amount of playing time Taylor got this past September once Robles came up. Almost none.

Now, if the team reasigns Harper? I don’t think much changes; the team moves either Eaton or Robles, still leaving Taylor as the 4th.

Lets start with, what do they need? They’re keeping Scherzer, Strasburg, Roark, and Ross. They can either go to war with a 5th starter like Fedde or McGowin or Voth or Jefry Rodriguez, or look at free agency to improve the back end. I’d love to get a 3rd starter-quality guy to slot in behind the big two, then hope for a better season from Roark (something closer to 2016 than 2018), and hope for Ross to come back to what we know he’s capable of. That’s a potentially solid rotation for me.

We also might be focusing on a lefty, since Gio Gonzalez was our only lefty starter. But I don’t think that should be a huge factor honestly. The team needs to find the best value and availability.

I don’t see them pursuing a $20M/year guy. Not with the amount of money already going to their two #1 starters and certainly not given the possibilty of their re-signing Harper.

So, lets think about middle-of-the road lefty veteran starters. How about someone like a Jaime Garcia, or Hyung-Jin Ryu?

If they can’t land a lefty, there’s a slew of interesting names out there that are righties. I like Nathan Eovaldi, Wade Miley, Garrett Richards.

Collier hedges and says the obvious; we won’t know until they decide what they’re doing with Harper. Yeah i get it. He mentions that Patrick Corbin is probably out of the conversation (duh; he’ll be like the 4th most expensive player this off-season) and mentions re-upping with Jeremy Hellickson, which I don’t think happens b/c he pitched himself into a decent sized contract.. Its also worth mentioning; maybe the team goes the trade route, which opens up the realm of possibles to half the league’s starters if they’re willing to give up Robles or Carter Kieboom in trade.

Q: At what point will the Nats start looking for a more durable first baseman? Zim has averaged only 100 games a season over the last five years.

A: Uh, the second Ryan Zimmerman isn’t guaranteed 8 figures a year? And, by the way, what is this guy missing with the current roster construction? We were nearly to the point of an 1980s Orioles John Lowenstein/Gary Roenecke type platoon this year between Zimmerman and the lefty hitting Matt Adams. The team is already mitigating Zimmerna’s annual health issues with a backup.

And guess what? They’ll do it again this off-season. Look for the team to sign another Adams clone, someone like Lucas Duda or Steve Pearce or Pedro Alvarez. Heck, maybe they’ll re-sign Adams.

Collier basically says the same thing I did.

Q: Will Riz let Difo and Kieboom fight it out for 2b in spring training or will he look for a veteran 2b, using Kendrick in a super utility role?

A: The question probably should have read: “Wil Rizzo let Difo and Howie Kendrick fight it out…” Because Kieboom aint’ making this team in 2019. For one, he’s never played 2B professionally. Not that its a heavy lift going from SS to 2B (it isn’t) .. but he’s also just 60-some games removed from A-Ball. Kieboom needs to go from the AFL back to AA and return his OPS figures back to the .880 level before even being considered for AAA.

Honestly, I think the team goes with Kendrick (assuming he’s recovered from his bad achilles injury) as the starter, with Difo as the utility guy. Thanks to Kendrick’s injury and Daniel Murphy‘s prolonged recovery, Difo was essentially a starter this year. And he did not impress, his average dropping 40 points from where it was last year. I think that cements his status as a backup utility infielder who can cover middle infield positions in a pinch. I’m glad we have someone on the bench who can at least hit at a 75 OPS+ figure; lets not push it.

That being said, for me Kieboom is the future here. I think he might be ready after a half a season, and at that point you bring him up and slot him in at 2B. He could eventually move to 3B if the team cannot retain Anthony Rendon, or can stay at 2B and be a Jeff Kent-style slugger. I’d love to see that come together and have him join Soto and Robles as the core of the next generation of this team.

Collier thinks the team might look elsewhere for a starting 2B. I think they can make-do from within and not waste money chasing another Murphy replacement.

Their posts both touched on some of the same issues; i’ll take those issues and add in a few of my own.

Major issues for the Nats to address this coming off-season, how I would address them and what I think the team will do:

Resolve Dusty Baker situation. Many reports have noted that the team wants him back and that he wants to return. I see little that he could have done differently in the 5-game NLDS loss to use as evidence that he’s not the right guy (you can’t lose when your pitchers throw 6 no-hit innings in playoff starts), and he’s so clearly a better man-manager than his predecessor Matt Williams that I see no reason not to extend him. I know that the Lerner’s don’t like to do long term contracts, and lets just hope they offer Baker the raise he deserves for two straight division titles (and, in my opinion, the NL Manager of the Year in 2017 award that he should get for working around so many injuries this year).

Should we bring back Jayson Werth? Yes he’s the “club house leader,” yes he’s been here for seven years and has settled in the DC area. But he struggled this year with both injuries and performance, is entering his age 39 year, posted a negative bWAR in 2017, and the team has a surplus of outfielders who are probably MLB “starters” heading into 2018, more than we can even field. I think the team says to Werth something along the lines of the following: Go see if you can find a DH/part time OF job in the AL for a couple years until you’re done playing and then we’ll hire you back as a special assistant/hitting instructor/bench coach or something. I’m not entirely convinced that Werth is a DC lifer though; he’s been kind of a nomad in his career. Drafted by Baltimore, traded to Toronto (with whom he debuted), traded to the Los Angeles Dodgers, signed as a FA with Philly for four years, then with us for seven. Yes he’s been with us the longest, but this isn’t a situation like Ryan Zimmerman where we’re the only org he’s known. I think he heads off to the AL for a couple years then comes back to the fold with a front office job.

What do we do at Catcher? I’ll quickly repeat what we’ve been discussing in the comments of previous posts; yes I know Matt Wieters struggled badly at the plate this year, yes I know he botched the 5th inning of that fateful game 5. But he’s not going to decline a $10M offer after this season, nor is the team going to swallow that amount of money. Prepare yourselves for another season of Wieters, who we can only hope bounces back in his “contract year” and gets a bump in performance. Meanwhile, as much as we love the Jose Lobaton cheerleader routine, we do need more production from the backup. Even though Lobaton got just 158 ABs this year, he still managed to put up a -1.0 bWAR figure. That’s hard to do. If only we could just have him only play for us in the playoffs … (big hit in game 5 in 2017, the clutch 3-run homer in 2016). I suspect the team will go with Wieters and Pedro Severino as his backup, getting Severino at least two starts a week to get him up to speed on MLB pitching, then making a 2019 decision based on whether Severino looks like he could hit enough to be a full time starter or if he remains the backup to some FA acquisition. We have others in the pipeline who may prove themselves worthy soon (Raudy Read in AAA, Taylor Gushue in AA, Jakson Reetz in High-A, Tres Barrera in Low-A, plus long-serving minor leaguers Spencer Kieboom and Jhonatan Solano in the AAA fold who may or may not come back for 2018).

Will they pursue FA extensions with key players? Namely, Bryce Harper, Anthony Rendon and Daniel Murphy. Lets take them one by one:

Harper: lets face it, there’s NO WAY he’s not hitting free agency. Scott Boras client with a chance to set the all time contract record? Both guys have the ego required to pursue that avenue. And yes, while some Boras clients (Stephen Strasburg) have taken pre-FA deals, very few do. You hire Boras generally to get the biggest value deal and to leverage his relationships with owners so as to negotiate directly with them and that’s what Harper will do.

Rendon: he’s still got two arb years: what I think the team will do is do a 2-year deal to buy out the Arb years and get cost containment. MLBtraderumors projected Rendon’s arb salary for 2018 at $11.5M and they’re usually pretty accurate; I could see the nats offering Rendon a 2yr/$26M deal for $10M in 2018 then $16M in 2019 or something like that … maybe a little higher in his final year given his MVP-calibre season. That’d be good for the team because Rendon might be a $20M/year player, and good for Rendon b/c he’s injury prone. Past this though … Rendon is also a Boras client but he projects to me kind of like Strasburg in that he’s low-key and may want to commit to DC longer term. Of course, Rendon is also a Houston lifer (born, high school and college there) so he could also want a return trip home to play for his home town team. Probably an issue for the 2020 hot-stove season.

Murphy: the Nats have gotten such a huge bargain with the Murphy signing. He’ll only be 34 at the beginning of his next deal, and he plays a position (2B) that isn’t nearly as taxing as an OF or other infield position. I would feel completely comfortable offering him another 3 year deal, increasing the dollars to maybe $16M/year (3yrs/$48M).

Do they need to pursue a Starting Pitcher? Absolutely, 100% yes. Joe Ross is out for basically the whole of 2018, they traded away all their AAA depth last off-season, and the guys remaining in AAA (A.J. Cole and Erick Fedde) did not grab the 5th starter job like they had the chance to in 2017. Edwin Jackson probably earned himself a shot elsewhere but was too inconsistent for my tastes. I think the team splurges here, trying to get the best additional veteran starter they can find either on the free market or in trade. The market for starters is intriguing: Yu Darvish, Jake Arrieta are Cy-Young quality arms available. There’s some decent SPs like Masahiro Tanaka and Johnny Cueto who can opt out but who also may just stay put. There’s #4 starter types like Lance Lynn and Jeremy Hellickson who are available and could be good 5th starters for us. There’s guys who have put up good seasons but have struggled lately (Jaime Garcia, Francisco Liriano, Clay Buchholz) who could be intriguing. So it’ll be interesting to see who they get.

What is the Nats 2018 outfield? Do they stick with Internal options or do they hit the FA/trade Markets? I like a potential 2018 outfield of Taylor/Eaton/Harper. I like Taylor in CF providing better defense than Eaton right now, given that ACL injuries really are 2-year recoveries. Given Taylor’s big 2017 and his “Michael A Tater” NLDS, he’s more than earned a starting spot in 2018. That leaves some surplus in the OF for 2018 … something we’ll talk about next. There are some intriguing names out there on the FA market (J.D. Martinez, Justin Upton, Lorenzo Cain) who could slot into either LF or CF as needed and give a hopeful boost to the offense … but are any of those guys and their 8-figure salaries guarantees to be better than the cost-contained Taylor? I don’t think so, and that’s why I think we stick with him.

Do the Nats leverage their sudden depth of position players in trade this off-season? In particular, i’m talking about Wilmer Difo and Brian Goodwin, both of whom played extremely well when given the opportunity and who both proved that they’re MLB starting quality. If we stick with Taylor as a starter, then you have both Goodwin and Andrew Stevenson as able backups and that’s one too many. If we (going back to the previous point) buy another outfielder, then that’s even more surplus. I’m of the opinion that the team needs to sell high on both Difo and Goodwin and acquire needed assets (5th starter, bullpen help, near-to-the-majors pitching prospects).

What do we do with the bench? Drew, Lobaton, Kendrick, de Aza, Raburn all FAs, Lind has a player option but may want to try to parlay his excellent PH season into a FTE job. So that leaves … not much.

We have already talked about a backup catcher above

We need a RH bench bat who can play corners (1B/LF): that was Chris Heisey to start the year .. but he’s long gone. Kendrick ably filled this role … but he won’t sign back on as a utility guy given his excellent 2017.

If Lind doesn’t exercise his $5M player option, we’ll need a big bopper lefty on the bench again. We do have a guy like this on the farm and on our 40-man (Jose Marmolejos) but is he MLB ready? He had a nice AA season, but AA to the majors is a jump.

If we flip Difo, we’ll need a backup middle infielder. Do we keep him assuming that Turner/Murphy will get hit with injuries (as they both are apt to do?) Turner missed months, Murphy missed nearly 20 games in each of the past two years; is that enough to keep someone around versus flipping them?

We do seem OK with backup outfielders right now, assuming that Andrew Stevenson is sufficient as a 4th OF/CF-capable defensive replacement/pinch runner type.

So, that’s potentially a brand new bench. Luckily its not too hard to find veteran big-hitting RH or LH bats; we seem to do this every year and have some luck. Middle infielders? Would you sign up for another year of Drew? I don’t think I would at this point; he just seems to brittle to count on. I suspect the team will be quite active in this area.

9. What do we do with the bullpen? Right now, given the departing FA relievers (Perez, Kintzler, Blanton, Albers), our “standing pat” bullpen for 2018 looks something like this:

Closer: Doolittle

7th/8th inning guys: Madsen, Kelley, Glover

Lefties: Solis, Romero

Long Man: Grace/Cole

Minors options: Adams, Gott

So, that’s a pretty solid looking bullpen if two guys in particular are healthy: Kelley and Glover. Our entire strategy in the off-season seems to hinge on the health of these two. I have no guesses; so lets assume one of them is good and one of them has a significant all of 2018 injury. That means we probably pursue another Matt Albers type in the off-season. Meanwhile, there’s a difference of opinion on the value of both our current lefties: Romero’s ancillary numbers were barely adequate and lefties hit him for nearly a .300 BAA, so he’s not exactly an effective lefty. Solis blew up this season, posting a seasonal ERA of nearly 6.00 (his FIP was much better) and getting demoted at one point. But he gets lefties out, Baker trusts him, and I can’t see him not being a part of the solution. If the team thought they could improve upon Romero, perhaps they also pursue a lefty reliever (or resign the swashbuckler Perez). I’m ok with Grace as a long man (though his K/9 rates leave something to be desired) but I’d also like to see the team convert Cole to relief at this point. There’s some options issues to consider; Solis, Romero, Cole, and Grace are all out of options for next year, so they all either make the team or get cut loose.

So Summary:

Bring back Baker

Say good bye to Werth

Stand pat on catcher with internal options

Buy out Rendon’s arb years this year, talk about Murphy next year

Get a decent 5th starter

Go with Taylor/Eaton/Harper with Stevenson as your backup in the OF

Yes, trade Goodwin and Difo for stuff

Get one middle RH reliever, one middle LF reliever, convert Cole to relief

As we did with the ALDS, Lets look at the NLDS series with pitching matchups and make some quick predictions:

New York Mets-Los Angeles Dodgers:

Game 1: Kershaw vs deGrom

Game 2: Greinke vs Snydergaard

Game 3: Anderson vs Harvey

Game 4: likely Matz/Colon vs Wood

Game 5: likely Kershaw vs deGrom rematch

Prediction: I like Los Angeles in this series, in 5 games. I can’t see NY winning either game in LA, I see them easily winning Harvey’s start but then the Matz/Colon question for Game 4 could come back to haunt them. Matz hasn’t pitched in 2 weeks and Colon is 42 … but Colon dominated the Dodgers in his sole start against them this year. Meanwhile, Wood has plenty of experience with the Mets lineup from his time in Atlanta but has performed pretty poorly against them this season, so I could see this going game 5 in LA.

Chicago Cubs-St. Louis:

Game 1: Lackey vs Lester

Game 2: Garcia vs Hendricks

Game 3: Wacha vs Arrieta

Game 4: Lynn vs Hammel

Game 5: likely Lackey vs Lester rematch

St Louis won the season series against Chicago … but lost 4 out of 6 in their two September Series. St. Louis is banged up, they have questions about some of their starters, and their all-important catcher will be playing with a split on his thumb. Hmm. Meanwhile. Chicago’s bats are just all-out fearsome; Schwarber-Bryant-Rizzo, each of which can hit the ball 450 feet at any moment. Lester pitched excellently his last time in St. Louis and Lester doesn’t scare anybody, while Garcia could control Chicago’s lefties in game 2. Honestly, I think Chicago gets a split in St. Louis and then takes care of business at home; they’re going to win Arrieta’s game 3 start (StL wastes perhaps their best starter against Arrieta) and then the season is on Lynn’s shoulders. Lynn’s last two Chicago starts: 6ip (total), 9 runs. Prediction: Chicago in 4.

NY Mets: Only the Mets so far have announced their rotation order. Matt Harvey has quelled shut-down-gate talks by finishing out the season and saying he’d take the ball in the NLDS: hard to see him getting beat in his home game 3 start against the Dodgers, especially given his last outing (6ip, 11Ks). deGrom struggled somewhat down the stretch and Snydergaard is only 22; hard to see them beating the seasoned vets Kershaw/Greinke at home. We still don’t know if Matz is going to be healthy for game 4, but the potential LA opponent isn’t exactly scaring anyone, so I could see this go to a game 5 back in LA with Kershaw getting a 2nd divisional start.

LA: We say this every year: Kershaw is the greatest … and he has a 5+ post-season ERA. I’ll never bet against him in the playoffs, especially not after the September he had. Greinke either wins the Cy Young or finishes a close second, and Wood is an effective 3rd starter. This is a tough rotation to handle. But they’re going against probably the 2nd best rotation in the post-season, meaning this could be a tight 5-game set. Or not; watch every game will be 8-7.

StL: They don’t look tough … but this rotation led the Cardinals to a 100 win season in a division with two other 97+ game winners. That’s pretty amazing. Bet against them at your own peril. They were 11-8 versus the Cubs, 10-9 (and got outscored) against the Pirates, so I’m guessing they’re rooting for a Pittsburgh win in the WC play-in game.

NL Wild Card

Chicago Cubs: Arrieta, Hendricks, Haren, Lester (Hammel)

Pittsburgh Pirates: Cole, Liriano, Happ, Burnett (Morton)

Discussion/Prediction: Arrieta has given up 3 runs in the last month … and two of them were in his road start in Pittsburgh on 9/16/15. I could see a similar start from him again in the Wednesday WC game. So what can the Cubs do with Cole? They have also seen him twice in the last month, got shut down at home but got to him on 9/15/15 in Pittsburgh. Tough one to predict but I’m going with your presumptive Cy Young winner to hold serve in Pittsburgh, sending home the 97 win Pirates for the 2nd straight year in the play-in game. Prediction: Cubs win.

If the Cubs win, they’ll be at a huge disadvantage against the Cards. If the Pirates win, Liriano and Happ have been pitching well enough to get them back to their ace quickly and make a series of it.

AL Divisional Winners

Toronto: Price, Estrada, Buehrle, Dickey/Stroman

Kansas City: Cueto, Ventura, Volquez, Young (Medlen)

Texas: Hamels, Gallardo, Holland, Perez/Lewis

Discussion:

Toronto is setup for the playoffs and will get Price twice. The back-end of their rotation doesn’t exactly inspire confidence in a playoff series, but Toronto isn’t about top-notch pitching. They hope to bash their way to the title and just may do it. Would you roll the dice and sit Dickey for the 4th spot in favor of Stroman and his live arm? Do you insult the veteran Buehrle and leave him off your playoff roster (probably not).

Kansas City: blew Cueto in an attempt to keep home field and were successful, so Ventura likely gets two NLDS starts. Nationals re-tread Young suddenly looks like the #4 starter for a WS contender. Who would have thought that?

Texas burned Hamels just to get to the playoffs; they’ll struggle to compete against two David Price home starts. Who is their #4 in the playoffs? Will Toronto average 6 runs a game against this staff? Could be a short-post season run for the Rangers; no judgement here; they’ve done fantastically just to get into the playoffs given the number of rotation injuries and their poor start.

AL Wild Card

Houston: Keuchel, McHugh, McCullers, Kazmir/Fiers

New York Yankees: Tanaka, Severino, Pineda, Nova (Sabathia)

Discussion/Prediction: well, it doesn’t look good for the Yankees; Keuchel is scheduled to start and has thrown twice against New York this year: he threw a 6-hit shutout with 12 Ks against them in June and then threw 7 innings of 3-hit shutout ball in late August. He’s your shoe-in Cy Young Winner and seems likely to pitch the Astros into the divisional series. New York counters with Tanaka; in his sole appearance vs Houston he got lit up (5ip, 6runs) and the Yankees seem like they’re struggling just to field a lineup at season’s end. They get the home game but likely go out a loser to end their season. And if the Yankees somehow won, they’d have thrown their best pitcher … and one of the presumptive rotation members just checked himself into Alcohol Rehab. Prediction: Astros Win.

Interesting collection of guys with Washington ties featuring prominently in the 2015 playoffs.

Dan Haren was nearly released mid-season because he was so bad in Washington 2 years ago, now he’s the #3 starter on a 97 win team.

Marco Estrada was waived by the Nats after a long and uninspiring minor league career; now he’s the #2 starter for the AL favorite?

Chris Young played a whole season for Syracuse in 2013, working his way back from an injury. When he didn’t make the 2014 roster he signed with Seattle and has been pretty effective since.

Marcus Stroman was an 18th round pick out of HS by the Nats; he was listed as a SS (he’s only 5’8″) but went to Duke, became a power arm and was a 1st round pick by the Blue Jays 3 years later.

Colby Lewis signed on with the Nats back in the bad years, failing to make the team out of Spring Training in 2007. He hooked on with Oakland, playing most of the year in Sacramento before signing a 2-year gig in Japan.

(Editor’s Note: sorry for the tardiness on this post: I had it completely written and a WordPress or browser glitch lost 1,000 words of analysis. So it took a bit of time to cobble back together what I had originally written. Then the Souza trade hit, then the Cuban thing … and this got pushed).

What a GM Meeting week! As one of the Fangraphs guys noted, there were so many transactions, so fast, that he literally gave up trying to write individual analysis pieces and went to a running diary of sorts. I was amazed at the number of significant deals and trades made, especially when it came to starters. So lets take a look at who shook things up.

Chicago White Sox: acquired Jeff Samardzija in Oakland’s fire sale to go with established ace Chris Sale, the highly underrated Jose Quintana. From there the White Sox have question marks: John Danks is just an innings eater at this point and Hector Noesi was not effective in 2014. But the White Sox have one of the brightest SP prospects in the game at AAA in Carlos Rodon (their fast-rising 2014 1st round pick) and their former #1 prospect Erik Johnson (who struggled in his debut in 2014 but has a good minor league track record). So by the latter part of 2015 the White Sox could be a scary team for opposing offenses to face.

Minnesota: just signed Ervin Santana to join a rotation containing the rejuvinated Phil Hughes, the decent Ricky Nolasco and first rounder Kyle Gibson. If they (finally) call up former Nats 1st rounder Alex Meyer to fill out the rotation and replace the dregs that gave them #4 and #5 rotation spot starts last year, they could be significantly improved. Of course, the problem they face is the fact that they’re already playing catchup in the AL Central and still look like a 5th place team in this division.

Los Angeles Angels: adroitly turned one year of Howie Kendrick into six years of Andrew Heaney, who should thrive in the big AL West parks. If the Angels get a healthy Garrett Richards back to go along with the surprising Matt Shoemaker, they may have a surplus of decent arms being stalwards Jered Weaver and C.J. Wilson.

Miamihas spent some cash this off-season, but they’ve also gone shopping and upgraded their rotation significantly. After acquiring the decent Jarred Cosart at the trade deadline, they’ve flipped bit-players to acquire Mat Latos, added Dan Haren and a $10M check while parting ways with the unproven youngster Andrew Heaney, and should get ace Jose Fernandez back by June 1st if all goes well with his TJ rehab. Add to that Henderson Alvarez and the Marlins look frisky (their new-found depth enabled them to move Nathan Eovaldi to the Yankees). Rumors are that Haren won’t pitch unless he’s in SoCal, but $10M is an awful lot of money to turn up your nose at. This is an improved rotation no doubt, and the rest of the Marlins lineup looks good too.

New York Metsget Matt Harvey back. Enough said. Harvey-Jacob deGrom is one heck of a 1-2 punch.

Chicago Cubs: added an ace in Jon Lester, re-signed their own effective starter in Jason Hammel, and will add these two guys to the resurgent Jake Arrieta. Past that you have question marks: Kyle Hendricks looked great in 2014. And the Cubs gave nearly 60 starts last year to Travis Wood (5+ ERA) and former Nat Edwin Jackson (6+ ERA). I could envision another SP acquisition here and the relegation of Wood & Jackson to the bullpen/AAA/scrap heap.

Pittsburghwas able to resign Francisco Liriano and get A.J. Burnett for an under-market deal. This should keep them afloat if they end up losing Edinson Volquez in free agency. Otherwise they have decent back of the rotation guys and will get back Jamison Taillon perhaps in the early part of the year. This could help them get back to the playoffs with the anticipated step-back of NL Central rivals Cincinnati.

Los Angeles Dodgerssaid good bye to a stable of starters (Josh Beckett, Chad Billingsly, Kevin Correia, Dan Haren, Roberto Hernandez and Paul Maholm are all either FAs or have been traded away) and signed a couple of guys to go behind their big three of Kershaw, Greinke and Ryu who could quietly make a difference (Brandon McCarthy and Brett Anderson) if they remain healthy. That’s a bigger “if” on Anderson than McCarthy, who excelled once leaving the circus that Arizona was last year before the management house cleaning and should continue to excel in the huge park in LA. Were I Andrew Friedman, I’d re-sign at least a couple of these FA guys for 5th starter insurance … but then again, the Dodgers also have a whole slew of arms in AAA that could be their 5th starter. Or they could just open up their wallets again; there’s still arms to be had. Nonetheless, replacing 32 Haren starts with McCarthy will bring immediate benefits, and whoever they end up with as a 5th starter has to be better than the production they got last year out of that spot.

Team most improved: likely the Cubs.

What teams’ rotations have taken step backs or are question marks heading into 2015?

Boston: after trading away most of their veteran rotation last season, the Red Sox seem set to go into 2015 with this rotation: Clay Buchholz, Rick Porcello, Justin Masterson, Joe Kelly and Wade Miley. This rotation doesn’t look as good as it could be; Buchholz was awful in 2014, Porcello is good but not great, Masterson the same, Kelly seems like a swingman, and Miley has back to back 3.98 FIP seasons in the NL and will see some ERA inflation in the AL (though not as much as normal since Arizona is a hitter’s park). But Boston’s entire AAA rotation are among their top 10 prospects, so there’s plenty of depth they could use in trade or as reinforcements.

Detroit: Arguable if they’ve really taken a “step back,” but you have to question their direction. In the last two off-seasons they’ve traded away Doug Fister, Rick Porcello, Drew Smyly, prospect Robbie Ray and have (seemingly) lost Max Scherzer to free agency so that they can go into 2015 with this rotation: David Price, Justin Verlander, Anibel Sanchez, Alfredo Simon and Shane Greene. Is this a winning rotation for 2015?

Kansas City: They have replaced departing free agent ace James Shields with newly signed Edinson Volquez, keeping newly acquired Brian Flynn and 2014 draft darling Brandon Finnegan in the bullpen for now. KC is going to take a step back and will struggle to compete in the new super-powered AL Central in 2015, but have a slew of 1st round arms that look like they’ll hit in late 2015/early 2016. I do like their under-the-radar signing of Kris Medlen though; he could be a very solid addition to their rotation if he comes back from his 2nd TJ.

Oaklandwill have a new look in 2015, having traded away a number of core players. But their rotation should be OK despite having traded away Samardzija and let Jon Lester and Jason Hammel walk. Why? Because they stand to get back two very good rotation members who missed all of 2014 with TJ surgery in A.J. Griffin and Jarrod Parker. They should re-join the 2014 rotation members Sonny Grey, Scott Kazmir, newly acquired Jesse Hahn and either Jesse Chavez/Drew Pomeranz to form another underrated rotation. Of course, if these guys have injury setbacks, it could be a long season in Oakland.

Texasmade a couple of acquisitions, re-signing their own Colby Lewis and trading for Nats cast-off Ross Detwiler (who should fit in immediately as their 4th starter), to go with ace Yu Darvish and recently recovered Derek Holland. But Texas could significantly improve come mid-season when injured starter Martin Perez should return. The big question mark for Texas is Matt Harrison, who had to have two vertebrae in his back fused and may not return, ever. But if Harrison can come back, that gives Texas an opening day 1-5 that’s pretty improved over last year.

Clevelanddidn’t exactly have the world’s best rotation in 2014 but has done little to improve it going forward. They will continue to depend on Corey Kluber, newly minted Cy Young winner to head the line, but then its question marks. Carlos Carrasco was great in a combo role in 2014; where’d that come from? He was awful in years prior. Is Trevor Bauer dependable? They better hope so; that’s your #3 starter. They just signed Gavin Floyd after his injury shortened 9-game stint with Atlanta last year; he’s no better than a 4th/5th innings eater. Is Gavin Salazar ready for prime time? He wasn’t in 2014. And there’s little else on the farm; the Indians don’t have a significant starting pitcher prospect in their entire system.

Atlanta: The Braves surprisingly parted ways with Kris Medlen and not-so-surprisingly parted ways with Brandon Beachy, Gavin Floyd, Ervin Santana and Aaron Harang. That’s a lot of starter depth to cut loose. They look to go into 2015 with ace Julio Teheran followed by the newly acquired Shelby Miller, the inconsistent Mike Minor, the excellent but scary Alex Wood and under-rated 5th starter David Hale. That’s not a *bad* rotation … but it isn’t very deep. They have cut ties with guys who made nearly half their 2014 starts AND the guy who went 10-1 for them in 2012. They (inexplicably) picked up a starter in Rule-5 draft who had TJ surgery in June; are they really going to carry him that long on the active roster? They have no upper-end SP talent close to the majors. If one of these 5 starters gets hurt, Atlanta could be in trouble.

Philadelphia: all you need to know about the state of the Philadelphia franchise can be summed up right here: A.J. Burnett declined a $12.75M player option to play for the Phillies in 2015 and, instead, signed for 1 year, $8.5M to play for Pittsburgh. They will head into 2015 with their aging 1-2 punch of Cole Hamels and Cliff Lee, the former being constantly dangled in trade rumors but going nowhere because the Phillies GM clearly over-values what a guy like Hamels and his guaranteed contract can actually bring back in return in this market. Past Hamels/Lee there’s a bunch of non-descript names (David Buchanan, the waiver-claim Jerome Williams and the untested Cuban FA Miguel Gonzalez). Can this team even broach 70 wins?

Cincinnatiis moving backwards: they’ve traded away Mat Latos for pennies on the dollar (Keith Law says there’s “make-up issues.”) and moved the effective Alfredo Simon for other bit players. They’re putting a ton of faith that one-pitch Tony Cingrani will last a whole season and the youngster Anthony DeSclafini (obtained for Latos) will comprise a workable rotation. They do have a couple of decent prospects at AAA (Robert Stephenson and Michael Lorenzen) but they seem to be accepting that they’re taking a step back.

St Louistraded away their least effective starter (Shelby Miller) and acquired the best defensive RF in the game (Jason Heyward). Not a bad bit of work. But they now will go into 2015 with a question mark in the rotation; prospect Carlos Martinez will get the first shot and could be good; oft-injured Jaime Garcia is still hanging around, and there’s a couple of good arms in AAA who could matriculate into the rotation via the bullpen as Martinez did in 2014. It could end up being addition by subtraction (Martinez for Miller) but we’ll see.

Arizona has boldly re-made their rotation this off-season, dealing away 2014 opening day starter Wade Miley for a couple of SP prospects and dealing for 6 arms in total thus far. New rotation may not be flashy at the top (the enigmatic Josh Collmenter is slated for the opening day start in 2015) and is followed by former Tampa pitcher Jeremy Hellickson (traded for prospects), the two pitchers acquired from Boston for Miley in Rubby de la Rosa and Allen Webster and then a cattle-call for the 5th starter competition this spring. Arizona also ended up with former Nats farm-hand Robbie Ray, still have the highly regarded Archie Bradley waiting for his free agent clock to get pushed out a year, plus 2013’s darling Patrick Corbin coming off of TJ, not to mention Bronson Arroyo coming back from TJ later in the season. So there’s a lot of arms out there to choose from, eventually. But getting to Bradley-Corbin-Hellickson-de la Rosa-Webster from where they’ll start will be rough.

San Francisco‘s 2015 rotation could be just as effective as it needs to be (after all, they won the 2014 world series having lost Matt Cain mid-season and given the ineffective Tim Lincecum 26 starts). They seem to set to go with Cain, WS hero Madison Bumgarner, the age-less Tim Hudson, and then with Lincecum and re-signed aging FA Jake Peavy. This pushes Yusmeiro Petit to the bullpen for the time being and seemingly closes the door on Ryan Vogelsong‘s SF time. Rumor had it that they were all over Jon Lester… and missed. So a big acquisition to permanently sent Lincecum to the pen could still be in the works. SF’s bigger issue is the loss of offense. But the NL West is so weak they could still sneak into the playoffs again. I list them as question marks though because Cain might not be healthy, Lincecum could still suck, and Hudson and Peavy combined are nearly 80 years of age.

San Diegohas completely re-made their offense; do they have the pitching they need to compete? They signed Brandon Morrow to replace 32 awful starts they gave to Eric Stults last year; that should be an improvement. But they’ve traded away their 2nd best guy (Jesse Hahn) and are now set to have two lesser starters (Odrisamer Despaigne and Robbie Erlin) compete for the rotation. The Padres re-signed lottery ticket Josh Johnson (coming off what seems like his millionth season-ending arm injury) and still have TJ survivor Cory Luebke in the wings, possibly ready for April 1st. Their 1-2-3 of Andrew Cashner, Tyson Ross and Ian Kennedy isn’t that inspiring, but in San Diego’s home park, you don’t have to be Sandy Koufax to succeed. Have they done enough to compete in the NL West?

Which team has taken the biggest step back? Clearly for me its Arizona.

Who is left?

Well, clearly the two big FA names are Max Scherzer and James Shields. Scherzer gambled heavily on himself when he turned down 6/$144M. Would the Tigers make him a new offer? Are the Nationals possibly involved (I hope not for the sake of the team’s chemistry; what would it say to players if the Nats jettisoned Jordan Zimmermann so they could give Scherzer $150M?). He’d make a great fit in San Francisco … who wanted Lester but would get nearly the same great performance out of Scherzer. Meanwhile Shields could fit in Boston or for the Dodgers to give them the depth they’ve lost.

Past the two big names, you have older guys likely to go on one year deals. There’s no longer really room for Ryan Vogelsong in SF; he could be a decent option for someone. Aaron Harang has earned himself a likely 2 year deal as someone’s back of the rotation guy. Guys like Kyle Kendrick or Joe Saunders could be someone’s starter insurance policy. And of course there’s a slew of injury guys who are like pitching lottery tickets. Beachy, Billingsley, and Alexi Ogando all sound intriguing as reclamation cases.

But, once you get past Scherzer and Shields, anyone looking for a big upgrade will have to hit the trade market. The problem there seems to be this: there’s just not that many teams that are already waving the white flag for 2015. From reading the tea leaves this off-season, Atlanta is giving up, Cincinnati may be close, Philadelphia has begrudgingly admitted they’re not going to win, Arizona has already traded away its assets, Colorado is stuck in neutral, Oakland may look like they’re rebuilding but they still will be competitive in 2015, and young teams like Houston and Tampa aren’t giving up what they currently have. So a GM might have to get creative to improve their team at this point.

(Standard disclaimer; this is ranting about my fake baseball team. If you don’t play fantasy, might as well skip this).

I’m really beginning to question my abilities in fantasy sports. Despite being deep into baseball and knowing random things off the top of my head that should be of use in fantasy (which managers are more inclined to do closer by committee, which ball parks are skewed offensively and thus players who play there may be at an advantage), I struggle year after year.

This year, thanks to an unfortunately timed meltdown (I lost a week 0-10-2 after having been ahead early in the week), I dropped just out of the playoff spots in my league (top 6 make the playoffs out of a 12 team league). But the ills of my team were seen early. Once again, I was plagued by under performing players and a poor draft that left me churning the waiver wire. By the end of the season I had made 58 of the 65 allotted moves in a failed attempt to improve enough to sneak into the playoffs (where honestly, I would have been a tough out; I can grind out 6-5-1 wins with the best of them).

So, what happened? Here’s a link to the post talking about my initially drafted team. And here’s a matrix of my 21 initially drafted players, their performance on the year and a note indicating whether or not they over- or under-achieved (bold means on the team at year’s end, red = badly under performed, green = greatly over-performed).

Player

round Drafted/# Drafted overall

Yahoo o-rank 2013

Yahoo O-rank 2014

ADP at time of draft

2014 Perf Rank

Adam Jones-OF

1st round (#10 overall)

7

13

10th/11.4

21

Adrian Beltre-3B

2nd round (#15)

15

12

13th/13.2

46

Alex Rios-OF

3rd round (#34)

25

44

34th/35

179

Giancarlo Stanton-OF

4th round (#39)

222

26

24th/27.8

5

Kenly Janssen-RP

5th round (#58)

52

48

49th/53.2

102

Greg Holland-RP

6th round (#63)

36

63

62nd/62

60

Mark Trumbo-1B/OF

7th round (#82)

66

78

53rd/56.0

944

Carlos Santana-C/1B

8th round (#87)

134

87

69th/74.0

159

Shelby Miller-SP

9th round (#106)

76

88

110th/113.0

485

Hyung-Jin Ryu-SP

10th round (#111)

85

101

124th/127.2

95

Aaron Hill-2B

11th round (#130)

402

111

124th/115.8

364

Danny Salazar-SP

12th round (#135)

336

96

154th/150.4

355

Tony Cingrani-SP

13th round (#154)

152

133

156th/156.8

941

Jim Henderson-RP

14th round (#159)

130

155

170th/175.0

750

Shane Victorino-OF

15th round (#178)

67

113

125th/129.0

1144

Chris Archer-SP

16th round (#183)

175

171

208th/209.0

314

Asdrubal Cabrera-SS

17th round (#202)

267

151

171st/177.4

177

J.J. Hoover-RP

18th round (#207)

237

629

344th

922

Tim Hudson-SP

19th round (#226)

299

300

311th

171

Brandon Belt-1B

20th round (#231)

106

104

142th

988

Jake Odorizzi-SP

21st round (#250)

548

358

445th

197

So, what happened?

My first two picks didn’t underperform “badly,” but were not the super stars you need to take hold of a league. I didn’t really like Adam Jones or Adrian Beltre at the draft, and despite some hot streaks they’ve been disappointments. Beltre got hurt in camp and missed games at the beginning of the season. My #3 pick Alex Rios I finally gave up on and waived; his seasonal rank of 179 belies what he’s done the last two months (closer to the 900 ranked range). It’s never a good sign when your #3 pick gets waived thanks to performance (and not injury) reasons.

Giancarlo Stanton is my one major “win” out of the draft; a 4th round pick who likely will finish in the top 5 of stats on the season. At the time of this writing, he was trailing only Mike Trout in terms of fantasy rankings for offensive players. He single-handedly carried my team offensively for weeks on end and is a large reason that my team offense was 1st in homers and 3rd in RBI. I feel vindicated here: I suffered through at least two injury-riddled Stanton seasons in the past after having drafted him highly, and he’ll have the same issue next year; he’ll likely be a top-5 pick with a huge injury risk on his head.

My two big-time closers did not disappoint: both Janssen and Holland performed as expected and led me to be 5th in team saves and have a 14-7-1 record in the category on the year. This is a big lesson learned for me; you can get by with just two big-time closers and be successful in this category. Of course, I wanted more closers but got unlucky; my #3 closer Jim Henderson suddenly and without warning was yanked from the role on opening day. Another team vultured his replacement (Francisco “K-rod” Rodriguez); all he’s done is pitch lights out all year and is 6th in the league in saves. That should have been my 3rd closer. That was a disappointment. I tried just one waiver-wire closer grab (Chad Qualls for Houston) and despite picking correctly, Qualls went weeks without save opportunities so I dumped him after two weeks looking for more starter quality.

Lets talk about the god-awful positional player issues I had in the draft: Mark Trumbo started out white-hot, fractured his foot and missed months. Aaron Hill did not come closer to living up to the hype of fantasy analysts. Shane Victorino was on and off the D/L all year. And poor Brandon Belt fractured his thumb, fought his way back and then got hit in the head during BP and still remains on the concussion D/L.

Of the Starting Pitchers I gambled on: Shelby Miller struggled all year, Danny Salazar got demoted, as did Tony Cingrani. Chris Archer did not produce at fantasy levels and Jake Odorizzi struggled early and was dropped (I eventually picked him back up). I only kept two drafted starters on the team all year (Ryu and Hudson) and frankly Hudson was so bad for so long that I came pretty close to dumping him. That basically means that my “wait on starters” strategy was a complete failure, if I’m only keeping ONE decent starter the whole year.

So, for the 2nd straight year I cycled the waiver wires. Here’s some of the guys I went through:

Scheppers I took a gamble on b/c his numbers were so good as a reliever; mistake. He got shelled opening day and soon was on the D/L. A number of these pitchers were decent moves and pitched well for a while (especially Josh Beckett and Marcus Strohman). The biggest failure here was dumping Corey Kluber after he got hit hard opening day: He’s turned into the 16th best fantasy performer all year, a 2nd round talent. That was a huge mistake. I liked Eovaldi‘s peripherals (lots of Ks) but he struggled with runners and his ERA/WHIP were inflated all year. Skaggs got hurt, Kennedy was ineffective. I got great value for a while out of Keuchel, but after a good mid-summer he tailed off badly. Garcia made like one start before returning to the D/L. Josh Beckett was a great waiver wire pickup for a while, but he too got hurt and remains on the D/L today. Alex Wood was a great find. I snaked Gerrit Cole off the D/L just before he came back on but he contributed little. Most of my other experiments were far too inconsistent week-to-week to trust (see Trevor Bauer, Despaigne, Mike Leake, etc).

As mentioned before, I only tried to gamble on one closer waiver wire pickup thanks to the solid two starters that I had from draft day. Most of the available closers on the waiver wire were in committee situations and couldn’t be trusted anyway.

I worked 1B, 2B, and 3B hard. At one point I was trying to engineer a 3B trade, having Seager while he was hot and Arenado after he came off the D/L. But my potential trade partners badly low-balled me for Beltre (offering guys who were worth far less than Beltre was) and suddenly Seager dropped off a cliff, making his trade value useless. Eventually I dumped both.

1B pickups Napoli, Duda and especially Carter turned out to be huge winners. Once again proving my point that some positions are just so deep they’re not worth drafting. Same with outfielders to a certain extent; I had Ozuna all year and he’s turned out to be well worth it.

My season’s end Fantasy team after all this waiver wire churning. Bold are original, red are waiver wire:

You only need two big-time closers to compete. Spend draft picks in the 5th and 6th rounds, try to get a third closer later on and you’ll do fine. You must do a better job on the waiver wire though trying to grab closers if you want them.

There’s always 1B talent on waivers. Do not over-spend on 1B.

My strategy of over-loading on mediocre starters just doesn’t seem to be working. I was 3rd in wins and 5th in Ks, but 8th in ERA, dead last in losses and 11th in whip. Meanwhile the #1 team this year went with an uber-pitching strategy (over-drafting starters and ending up with Kershaw, Sale, Felix Hernandez as well as several top closers) and he just dominated pitching. Despite having a ton of starters, he managed to be 4th in Wins AND be 2nd in Whip. I think he’s got a good strategy. And i’m sure people will try to emulate it next year.

Do not sweat churning and burning waiver wire picks early on; you may just end up with a monster surprise player on the year. This was the 1st place team’s strategy and it netted him Charlie Blackmon and a couple of extra closers. Two of the top 10 starters on the year were waiver wire guys: CoreyKluber and Garrett Richard.

Do not hesitate grabbing big-name call-ups. I missed out on more than a couple guys that I would have grabbed but hesitated. This cost me last year with Yasiel Puig and it cost me this year with Jorge Soler and George Springer. I waited, and I missed out.

This year’s MLB trade deadline was crazy. Never before have so many big-time names moved teams. And certainly I cannot remember so many big-time pitchers relocating mid-season as well.

Lets look at the playoff contender rotations as they stand right now, with Trade deadline acquisitions highlighted in blue.

NL

Washington: Strasburg, Gonzalez, Zimmerman, Fister, Roark

Atlanta: Teheran, Minor, Santana, Harang, Wood

Milwaukee: Lohse, Garza, Gallardo, Peralta, Nelson

Cincinnati: Cueto, Latos, Bailey, Leake, Simon

St. Louis: Wainwright, Masterson, Lackey, Lynn, Miller

Pittsburgh: Liriano, Morton, Locke, Volquez, Worley

Los Angeles: Kershaw, Greinke, Ryu, Beckett, Haren

San Francisco: Bumgarner, Hudson, Lincecum, Vogelsong, Peavy

St. Louis clearly did the most in the NL, acquiring two mid-rotation guys to help cover for the injured Michael Wacha and Jaime Garcia, but it is hard to look at their rotation and say they’d have the advantage over some of their potential playoff rivals. San Francisco lost its ace (thought he hasn’t pitched like an Ace since signing his new deal) Matt Cain, and his replacement was not inspiring confidence (Yusmiero Petit), so they added former Cy Young winner Peavy (who is pitching better than his 1-11 W/L record .. but not a lot better). Otherwise the NL playoff contenders mostly stood pat. There was some small surprise that the free-spending Dodgers wouldn’t try to improve upon the suddenly underperforming Josh Beckett and/or the “fool-me-once” Dan Haren. They’ll struggle to get through the #3 and #4 starts of their planned playoff rotation to get back to their co-aces Kershaw and Greinke (who was good but not shut-down in last year’s playoffs). The home-town Nats may find themselves with an uncomfortable decision to make if they make the playoffs; which starter to send to the pen? Roark is the least renound and the least tenured … but he has clearly been more effective than other rotation members.

It continues to amaze that the Braves are competing, given the losses they’ve faced in their rotation. They are missing (arguably) their planned #2, #3 and #5 starters in Kris Medlen, Brandon Beachy and Gavin Floyd but are getting by thanks to two mid-spring acquisitions (Santana and Harang) and the surprise performances of youngsters Wood and David Hale (who didn’t merit his demotion to the bullpen).

AL

Baltimore: Tillman, Norris, Chen, Gonzalez, Gausman

Toronto: Buehrle, Dickey, Happ, Strohman, Hutchinson

New York: Kuroda, Phelps, Capuano, Greene, McCarthy

Detroit: Scherzer, Verlander, Sanchez, Price, Porcello

Kansas City: Shields, Duffy, Ventura, Guthrie, Vargas

Oakland: Grey, Samardzija, Lester, Hammel, Kazmir

Los Angeles: Weaver, Wilson, Richards, Shoemaker, Santiago

Seattle: Hernandez, Iwakuma, Paxton, Elias, Young

I didn’t include fringe playoff contenders such as Cleveland or Tampa Bay here; both of those rotations were purged and weakened, and their odds of catching one of these listed WC contendors is long. Oakland completely re-made their rotation here, attempting to keep up with Detroit, who now features the last three AL Cy Young winners to go along with Sanchez (who finished 4th last year in a season where he led the league in both ERA and FIP). That’s quite a lineup. Meanwhile Seattle likely finishes 10 games back of the Angels and could end up facing them in the coin-flip wild-card game … and could end up throwing the best pitcher in the AL at them (which has been noted as a significant down-side to the 2nd wild-card matchup; who wants to see a team lose out to a divisional rival that they bested by so many games in a play-in game?).

New York is the “Atlanta” of the AL this year; they currently have four planned rotation members on the D/L and (likely) out for the year (CC Sabathia, Ivan Nova, Michael Pineda and Masahiro Tanaka). Their 4th and 5th starters were a 14th and 15th round pick respectively. They’ve been outscored by nearly 30 runs on the year yet somehow have a winning record. It seems like just a matter of time before their luck runs out and they settle back below .500.

Who would you rather go to war with, Detroit or Oakland’s rotation? Probably Detroit’s rotation, given its depth one to four. But the ALCS could be one heck of a series.

This may be the last time I use Haren’s picture in a Nats uniform on this blog. Photo via Zimbio.com

They say success has many fathers but failure is an orphan. Well, here’s a whole slew of orphan-causing problems that befell this team this year. I started this post months ago, when the team sputtered in July and suddenly sat at 54-60. None of these bullet points are surprises. Maybe I forgot some key points; feel free to tack ’em on. This is a cathartic, washing my hands of the 2013 season, where so many things conspired to go wrongly.

Davey Johnson, for continued pitching/bullpen mismanagement episode after episode, for seemingly losing the clubhouse (see below), for sticking with severely under-performing players (Espinosa, Haren especially) far, far too long, for failing to react to repeated beanings of his best player, and for generally looking old, tired and out-matched this year at press conference after press conference. This team needs a new voice, a disciplinarian who will command more respect than what Johnson was commanding from this team. My vote is for Matt Williams.

Injuries. Every team has injuries; I’m not going to write some simplistic statement that says “well if we had So-and-So healthy all year we’d have won the division.” Look at St. Louis: they’re missing Chris Carpenter and Jaime Garcia basically all year and still won the best division in the game. I think the issue most people will have with the Nats is the way their players’ injuries were handled. Bryce Harper missed the whole month of June after several wall collisions finally caught up to him and he was clearly in pain the rest of the season. Did the team not allow him to get healthy at the end of April? Meanwhile you have to take serious issue with either the team, Danny Espinosa or both over the handling of his injuries. What good did it do anyone to allow Espinosa to try to play through the significant shoulder injury he apparently has? Why has he STILL not had the surgery done to fix it? It sounds to me like there’s some serious stubbornness on both sides of this fence. Ross Detwiler looked to be on the verge of a breakout season in 2012 … and now he’s back to being the broken down starter he’s mostly been during his time here. In his 6 pro seasons he’s not pitched full seasons in 3 of them. This isn’t necessarily on the team .. but I will ask this: at what point do you go into a season counting on Detwiler to break down instead of the reverse? It goes to proper roster planning (also mentioned later on).

Bench production, for regressing so far past the mean from last year’s over production. Did you know that Steve Lombardozzi got more than 300 plate appearances this year with this slash line: .255/.276/.337? I know you need backup utility infielders, but man, that’s a huge 68 OPS+ hole getting a ton of ABs. Our opening-day bench of Lombardozzi/Moore/Bernadina/Tracy posted these OPS+ figures in 2012: 82/123/111/111. In 2013? 69/66/43/55. Wow. That’s just a startling drop-off in production. To add insult to injury Kurt Suzuki‘s OPS+ went from a respectable 95 last year to 64 this year. Basically every pinch hitting spot or guy off the bench covering for a starter turned into an 0-4 outing. We know that at least 3 of these 5 bench guys are gone; who will replace them?

Dan Haren. $13M for one of the worst starters in the game, even given his little August rebound. The team finished 4 games out of the wild card, 10 games back of Atlanta. In Dan Haren’s 30 starts, the Nats went 11-19. In every other pitcher’s starts, the team went 75-57. That’s a .568 winning percentage, which equates to 92 wins. Even a #5 starter who gave the team a 50/50 chance of winning on any given sunday would have basically put the team into the WC game. Haren was just a really really poor FA acquisition who contributed a huge part to the downfall of the team. I wonder at this point if the Nats didn’t fail to do the proper medical due diligence on Haren; there was a reason the proposed trade to the Cubs fell through and there was a reason the Angels did not give him a qualifying offer. I fully admit: I was completely on board with the signing, thinking we were getting the pre 2012 Haren. Wrong; something clearly changed for him after the 2011 season and I wonder how much longer he can stay in the league after his last two seasons. I’m sure he’ll get another one-year deal for 2014 based on his stronger finish, but another 5+ ERA season may finish him.

Offense in general: The team scored 656 runs on the year. That’s down fully 75 runs from last year, when they were 10th in the league in scoring. Had they produced like they did last year in 2013 (about 10th in the league in runs scored and other key indicators), they’d have scored around 700 runs, probably good for at least 10 more wins (under the rough estimate that it takes about 4 “extra” runs per win). With 10 more wins … they’re winning the division again (since some of those added wins come at the hands of Atlanta).

Hitting in the Clutch: Ask any sabre-nerd and they’ll tell you that “clutch” doesn’t exist and that all aspects of batting (good or bad) with RISP is merely coincidence (this came up again recently with David Ortiz’ game-changing NLCS homer). I don’t entirely buy it. I think hitting with runners on base is a skill that can be practiced and honed. I think there’s importance to driving runners in when you have the opportunity. I think a batter with a runner on third and less than one out can absolutely look for a ball that he can hit into the air, thus driving in the run. Anyway: let’s look at how well the Nats offense hit in the clutch this season (see this team-stats split link at tFangraphs). The Nats team batting average with runners on base is ranked 19th in the league; its wRC+ as a team 17th. However, change “runners on base” to “high leverage” in the Fangraphs split and you get this: Nats were 29th in high leverage batting average, 28th in wRC+. That’s right: almost dead last in the league in high-leverage hitting for the year. When they came to bat in situations that mattered, they were one of the worst teams in the league. Any way you slice it … that’s not “clutch.”

Clubhouse Issues: I know that many readers here get irritated with presumptions of “chemistry” issues, writing comments about how we have no idea what really goes on in the clubhouse. Fair enough; we don’t need to rehash the argument. Absent any proof, I believe something might have been amiss. Reporters have noted the losses of free-spirit Morse and the level headed DeRosa. The Soriano acquisition brought a known surly loner with behavior problems into a tight knit bullpen and resulted in the chain reaction demotion of two guys (Storen and Clippard) who didn’t necessarily deserve to be demoted. I believe Harper was fed up with Johnson’s message and was caught on camera more than once clearly ignoring or showing disdain to something he was being told. To say nothing of the ridiculousness of Harper getting hit over and over without any of his teammates getting his back. Can a new manager fix this? Probably. Can a leadership void fix this? Definitely. Perhaps with Jayson Werth‘s great season he can step up in the clubhouse and be the voice of reason moreso than it seems he has been before (either because he was struggling on the field or collapsing under the weight of his contract).

Rizzo’s mis-management of the 2013 roster: Rizzo just had to have his speedy leadoff/centerfielder, and Span underperformed when it counted (I’m on record stating over and over that the team is wasting Harper’s defensive capabilities in left and blocking a power-hitter acquisition by sticking with Span in center. But what’s done is done). The opening day roster had no left handed specialists, a move that I quasi-defended at the time but which turned out to be disastrous. We relied on a MLFA (and frankly, we over-relied an incredibly short sample size) for the long man (Duke) and he failed. We had absolutely no starting pitching depth in the high Minors and got rather lucky that Taylor Jordan materialized out of the thin air of high-A and Tanner Roark suddenly added 5 mph to his fastball and turned into an effective MLB hurler. We had a $120M payroll but were depending on bargain basement acquisitions in key roles. That just has to change for 2014. Don’t go looking to save pennies on the proverbial dollar by non-tendering useful guys (as they did with Tom Gorzelanny last year); do the right thing and lock these guys up. You had enough to waste $30M on Soriano but couldn’t find the scratch to keep around half of 2012’s bullpen?

Pressure. this team had no pressure last year, and all of the pressure this year. Nearly every baseball pundit with a blog, microphone or column picked them to win the division (me included), and lots picked them to win 100+ games (me included). Look at how awfully they fared this year against the NL playoff bound teams:

Stl: 0-6, scoring just 8 runs in 6 games.

LA Dodgers: 1-5

Atlanta: 6-13. Outscored 73-49

Pittsburgh: 3-4

Cincinnati: 4-3 but outscored 36-27 thanks to a 15-0 spanking the 2nd week of the season.

When the chips were down, they folded. Especially against Atlanta, who pushed the team around, continually threw at us, and we had no reaction (that is until Strasburg suddenly had a fit of wildness which some will argue was less about standing up for his players and more about being off that day). I lay this at the manager’s feet again. Atlanta has proved time and again (and again) that they’re capable of acting like bullies when it comes to “unwritten rules” of the game, and Johnson let this go unchecked far too long. A new manager with some balls will put an end to this nonesense, fast. Sorry to sound crude, but it is what it is. Johnson had no balls and made his entire team look weak in the face of the Braves.

Yes its great the team had a run in August and September. What does it really mean? Their schedule was cake in August and then filled with teams with AAA callups in September. Who is the real Denard Span? The guy who hit .235 in the middle of the summer or the guy who hit .303 in September? Can Werth keep this kind of production up in the face of father time in 2014? Can LaRoche return his OPS to something better than what a middling 2nd baseman can produce? Can Harper stop running into walls and stay on the field?

I think the scarier part for Nats fans is the fact that this team is basically going to be the exact same team next year. Nearly every position player, likely the entire rotation (simply replace Haren with a healthy Detwiler), most all of the bullpen. There’s not a lot of holes here, not a lot of wiggle room. Unless there’s a major trade on the horizon that drastically reshapes the roster, this is your team in 2014. Can they turn it around and make up the 14 games they declined in the win column?

In summary; which of the above points IS the real issue behind 2013’s disaster? And how do you fix it? Because if you don’t address it, then 2014 is going to be the same story.

Scherzer’s dominant Cy Young season brings the Tigers to the top. Photo AP Photo/Paul Sancya

In January, after most of marquee FA signings had shaken out, I ranked the 2013 rotations of teams 1-30. I was excited about the Nats rotation, speculated more than once that we had the best rotation in the league, and wanted to make a case for it by stacking up the teams 1-30.

I thought it’d be an interesting exercise to revisit my rankings now that the season is over with a hindsight view, doing some post-mortem analysis and tacking on some advanced metrics to try to quantify who really performed the best this season. For advanced metrics I’m leaning heavily on Fangraphs team starter stats page, whose Dashboard view quickly gives the team ERA, FIP, xFIP, WAR, SIERA, K/9 and other key stats that I’ll use in this posting.

(#2 pre-season) Detroit: Verlander, Fister, Sanchez, Scherzer, Porcello (with Alvarez providing some cover). Scherzer likely wins the Cy Young. Three guys with 200+ strikeouts. The league leader in ERA. And we havn’t even mentioned Justin Verlander yet. A team starting pitching fWAR of 25.3, which dwarfed the next closest competitor. There’s no question; we knew Detroit’s rotation was going to be good, but not this good. Here’s a scary fact; their rotation BABIP was .307, so in reality this group should have done even better than they actually did. Detroit’s rotation was *easily* the best rotation in the league and all 6 of these guys return for 2014.

(#3 Preseason): Los Angeles Dodgers: Kershaw, Greinke, Ryu, Nolasco, and Capuano (with Fife, Beckett, Lilly, Billingsley and a few others helping out); The 1-2 punch of Kershaw (the NL’s clear Cy Young favorite) and Greinke (who quietly went 15-4) was augmented by the stand-out rookie performance of Ryu, the surprisingly good half-season worth of starts from Nolasco, and then the all-hands-on deck approach for the rest of the starts. This team used 11 different starters on the year thanks to injury and ineffectiveness, but still posted the 2nd best team FIP and 5th best fWAR in the league.

(#8 pre-season): St. Louis: Wainwright, Lynn, Miller, Wacha and Kelly (with Garcia, Westbrook, and a few others pitching in). Team leader Chris Carpenter missed the whole season and this team still was one of the best rotations in the league. Westbrook missed time, Garcia only gave them 9 starts. That’s the team’s planned #1, #3 and #4 starters. What happened? They call up Miller and he’s fantastic. They call up Wacha and he nearly pitches back to back no-hitters at the end of the season. They give Kelly a starting nod out of the bullpen and he delivers with a better ERA+ than any of them from the #5 spot. St. Louis remains the bearer-standard of pitching development (along with Tampa and Oakland to an extent) in the game.

(#22 pre-season): Pittsburgh: Liriano, Burnett, Locke, Cole, Morton (with Rodriguez and a slew of call-ups helping out). How did this team, which I thought was so low pre-season, turn out to have the 4th best starter FIP in the game? Francisco Liriano had a renessaince season, Burnett continued to make Yankees fans shake their heads, and their top 6 starters (by number of starts) all maintained sub 4.00 ERAs. Gerrit Cole has turned out to be the real deal and will be a force in this league.

(#1 pre-season) Washington: Strasburg, Gonzalez, Zimmermann, Haren, Detwiler with Jordan, Roark and other starts thrown to Karns and Ohlendorf). Despite Haren’s continued attempts to sabotage this rotation’s mojo, they still finished 3rd in xFIP and 5th in FIP. Haren’s 11-19 team record and substandard ERA/FIP values drug this group down, but there wasn’t much further up they could have gone on this list. If you had replaced Haren with a full season of Jordan’s production, maybe this team jumps up a little bit, but the teams above them are tough to beat.

(#11 pre-season) Atlanta: Hudson, Medlen, Minor, Teheranand Maholm, (with rookie Alex Wood contributing towards the end of the season). Brandon Beachy only gave them 5 starts; had he replaced Maholm this rotation could have done better. Hudson went down with an awful looking injury but was ably covered for by Wood. They head into 2014 with a relatively formidable and cheap potential rotation of Medlen, Minor, Teheran, Beachy and Wood, assuming they don’t resign Hudson. How did they over-perform? Teheran finally figured it out, Maholm was more than servicable the first couple months, Wood was great and came out of nowhere.

(#26 pre-season) Cleveland: Jimenez, Masterson, McAllister, Kluber, Kazmir. Too high for this group? 7th in rotation fWAR, 8th in FIP, and 6th in xFIP. This group, which I thought was going to be among the worst in the league, turned out to be one of the best. Jimenez and Masterson both had rebound years with a ton of Ks, and the rest of this crew pitches well enough to remain around league average. They were 2nd best in the league in K/9. You can make the argument that they benefitted from the weakened AL Central, but they still made the playoffs with a relative rag-tag bunch.

(#9 pre-season) Cincinnati: Cueto, Latos, Bailey, Arroyo, Leake (with Tony Cingrani). Cueto was good … but he was never healthy, hitting the D/L three separate times. Luckily Cingrani came up from setting strikeout records in AAA and kept mowing them down in the majors. Latos was dominant, Leake took a step forward, and Bailey/Arroyo gave what they normally do. If anything you would have thought this group would have been better. 6th in Wins, 7th in xFIP, 9th in FIP. Next year Arroyo leaves, Cingrani gets 32 starts, Cueto stays healthy (cross your fingers, cross your fingers, cross your fingers) and this team is dominant again despite their FA hitting losses.

(#25 pre-season) New York Mets: Harvey, Wheeler, Niese, Gee, Hefner and a bunch of effective call-ups turned the Mets into a halfway-decent rotation all in all. 7th in xFIP, 11th in FIP. Most of this is on the backs of Matt Harvey, who pitched like the second coming of Walter Johnson for most of the season. Wheeler was more than effective, and rotation workhorses Niese and Gee may not be sexy names, but they were hovering right around the 100 ERA+ mark all year. One superstar plus 4 league average guys was good enough for the 9th best rotation.

(#12 pre-season) Texas: Darvish, Holland, Ogando, Perez, Garza at the end. Texas’ fWAR was the 2nd best in the league … but their accompanying stats drag them down this far. Despite having four starters with ERA+s ranging from 114 to Darvish’ 145, the 34 starts given to Tepesch and Grimm drag this rotation down. Ogando couldn’t stay healthy and Perez only gave them 20 starts. Garza was mostly a bust. And presumed #2 starter Matt Harrison gave them just 2 starts. But look out for this group in 2014; Darvish, a healthy Harrison, and Holland all locked up long term, Ogando in his first arbitration year, and Perez is just 22. That’s a formidable group if they can stay on the field together.

(pre-season #6) Tampa Bay: Price, Moore, Hellickson, Cobb, Archer and Roberto Hernandez. Jeff Niemann didn’t give them a 2013 start, but no matter, the Tampa Bay gravy train of power pitchers kept on producing. Cobb was unhittable, Archer was effective and Moore regained his 2011 playoff mojo to finish 17-4 on the year. An odd regression from Price, which was fixed by a quick D/L trip, and a complete collapse of Hellickson drug down this rotation from where it should have been. They still finished 12th in FIP and xFIP for the year.

(pre-season #21) Seattle: Hernandez, Iwakuma, Saunders, Harang, Maurer, and Ramirez.Seattle featured two excellent, ace-leve performers and a bunch of guys who pitched worse than Dan Haren all year. But combined together and you have about the 12th best rotation, believe it or not.

(pre-season #7) Philadelphia: Halladay, Hamels, Lee, Kendrick, Lannan (with Cloyd and Pettibone as backups). The phillies were 13th in xFIP, 10th in FIP on the year and regressed slightly thanks to the significant demise to their #1 guy Halladay. Lee pitched like his typical Ace but Hamels self-destructed as well. The strength of one excellent starter makes this a mid-ranked rotation. Had Halladay and Hamels pitched like expected, they’d have finished closer to my pre-season ranking.

(pre-season #17) Boston: Lester, Buchholz, Dempster, Lackey,Doubront, and Peavy: Boston got a surprise bounce back season out of Lackey, a fantastic if oft-injured performance from Buchholz, a mid-season trade for the effective Peavy. Why aren’t they higher? Because their home stadium contributes to their high ERAs in general. Despite being 3rd in rotation fWAR and 4th in wins, this group was 17th in FIP and 18th in xFIP. Perhaps you could argue they belong a couple places higher, but everyone knows its Boston’s offense that is driving their success this year.

(pre-season #16) New York Yankees: Sabathia, Kuroda, Pettitte, Nova, Hughes/Phelps. Hughes and Phelps pitched as predictably bad as you would have expected … but Sabathia’s downturn was unexpected. Are his years of being a workhorse catching up to him? The rotation was buoyed by unexpectedly good seasons from Nova and Kuroda. Pettitte’s swang song was pretty great, considering his age. Enough for them to slightly beat expectations, but the signs of trouble are here for this rotation in the future. Pettitee retired, Kuroda a FA, Hughes a FA, a lost season for prospect Michael Pineda and other Yankees prospects stalled. Are we in for a dark period in the Bronx?

(pre-season #29) Miami: Fernandez, Nolasco, Eovaldi, Turner, Alvarez,Koehler and a few other starts given to either re-treads or MLFAs. For Miami’s rotation of kids to rise this far up is amazing; looking at their stellar stats you would think they should have been higher ranked still. Fernandez’s amazing 176 ERA+ should win him the Rookie of the Year. Eovaldi improved, rookie Turner pitched pretty well for a 22 year old. The team dumped its opening day starter Nolasco and kept on … losing frankly, because the offense was so durn bad. Begrudgingly it looks like Jeffry Loria has found himself another slew of great arms to build on.

(pre-season #5) San Francisco: Cain, Lincecum, Bumgarner, Vogelsong, Zito, Gaudin.What the heck happened here? Cain went from an Ace to pitching like a 5th starter, Lincecum continued to completely forget what it was like to pitch like a Cy Young winner, Vogelsong completely fell off his fairy-tale cliff, and Zito completed his $126M journey in typical 5+ ERA fashion. I’m surprised these guys are ranked this high (14th in FIP, 16th in xFIP but just 27th in fWAR thanks to just horrible performances all year). What the heck are they going to do in 2014?

(pre-season #10) Arizona: Corbin, Kennedy, McCarthy, Cahill, Miley and Delgado. Corbin was 2013’s version of Miley; a rookie that came out of nowhere to lead the staff. Miley struggled at times but righted the ship and pitched decently enough. The rest of the staff really struggled. I thought this was a solid bunch but they ended up ranked 23rd in FIP and 14th in xFIP, indicating that they were a bit unlucky as a group.

(pre-season #15) Chicago White Sox: Sale, Peavy, Danks, Quintana, Santiago and Axelrod. Floyd went down early, Peavy was traded. Sale pitched well but had a losing record. The team looked good on paper (16th in ERA) but were 26th in FIP and 17th in xFIP.

(pre-season #14) Oakland: Colon, Anderson, Griffen, Parker, Straily, Milone, with Sonny Gray giving 10 good starts down the stretch. This rotation is the story of one amazing 40-yr old and a bunch of kids who I thought were going to be better. Oakland is bashing their way to success this season and this group has been just good enough to keep them going. I thought the likes of Griffen and Parker would have been better this year, hence their falling from #14 to #19.

(pre-season #19) Chicago Cubs: Garza, Samardzija, Jackson, Wood, and Feldman: Feldman and Garza were flipped once they showed they could be good this year. Samardzija took an uncharacteristic step backwards. Jackson was awful. The Cubs ended up right about where we thought they’d be. However in 2014 they look to be much lower unless some big-armed prospects make the team.

(pre-season #20) Kansas City: Shields, Guthrie, Santana, Davis, Chen, Mendoza: despite trading the best prospect in the game to acquire Shields and Davis, the Royals a) did not make the playoffs and b) really didn’t have that impressive a rotation. 12th in team ERA but 20th in FIP and 25th in xFIP. Compare that to their rankings of 25th in FIP and 26th in xFIP in 2012. But the results on the field are inarguable; the team improved 14 games in the Win column and should be a good bet to make the playoffs next year if they can replace the possibly-departing Santana and the ineffective Davis.

(pre-season #23) Milwaukee: Lohse, Gallardo, Estrada, Peralta, and dozens of starts given to long-men and call-ups. I ranked this squad #23 pre-season before they acquired Lohse; in reality despite his pay and the lost draft pick, Lohse’s addition ended up … having almost no impact on this team in 2013. They finished ranked 23rd on my list, and the team was 74-88.

(pre-season #13): Los Angeles Angels: Weaver, Wilson, Vargas, Hanson, Blanton,Williams: The Angels are in a predicament; their two “aces” Weaver and Wilson both pitched well enough. But nobody in baseball was really that surprised by the god-awful performances from Hanson or Blanton (2-14, 6.04 ERA … and the Angels gave him a two year deal!). So in some ways the team brought this on themselves. You spend half a billion dollars on aging offensive FAs, have the best player in the game languishing in left field because your manager stubbornly thinks that someone else is better in center than one of the best defenders in the game … not fun times in Anaheim. To make matters worse, your bigtime Ace Weaver missed a bunch of starts, looked mortal, and lost velocity.

(#28 pre-season) San Diego: Volquez, Richards, Marquis, Stults, Ross, Cashner: have you ever seen an opening day starter post a 6+ ERA in a cave of a field and get relased before the season was over? That happened to SAn Diego this year. Another case where ERA+ values are deceiving; Stults posted a sub 4.00 ERA but his ERA+ was just 87, thanks to his home ballpark. In fact its almost impossible to tell just how good or bad San Diego pitchers are. I could be talked in to putting them this high or all the way down to about #28 in the rankings.

(pre-season #27) Colorado: Chatwood, De La Rosa, Chacin, Nicaso, Francis and a few starts for Garland and Oswalt for good measure. Another staff who shows how deceptive the ERA+ value can be. Their top guys posted 125 ERA+ figures but as a whole their staff performed badly. 26th in ERA, 19th in FIP, 26th in xFIP. Colorado is like Minnesota; they just don’t have guys who can throw it by you (29th in K/9 just ahead of the Twins), and in their ridiculous hitter’s park, that spells trouble.

(pre-season #4) Toronto: Dickey, Morrow, Johnson, Buehrle, Happ,Rogers, and a line of other guys. What happened here? This was supposed to be one of the best rotations in the majors. Instead they fell on their face, suffered a ton of injuries (only Dickey and Buehrle pitched full seasons: Romero, Drabeck were hurt. Johnson, Happ, Redmond only 14-16 starts each. This team even gave starts to Chien-Ming Wang and Ramon Ortiz. Why not call up Fernando Valenzuela out of retirement? It just goes to show; the best teams on paper sometimes don’t come together. The Nats disappointed in 2013, but probably not as much as the Blue Jays.

(pre-season #18) Baltimore: Hammel, Chen, Tillman, Gonzalez, Feldman, Garcia with a few starts given to Gausman and Britton. I’m not sure why I thought this group would be better than this; they were in the bottom four of the league in ERA, FIP, xFIP and SIERA. It just goes to show how the ERA+ value can be misleading. In their defense, they do pitch in a hitter’s park. Tillman wasn’t bad, Chen took a step back. The big concern here is the health of Dylan Bundy, who I thought could have pitched in the majors starting in June.

(pre-season #30) Houston: Bedard, Norris, Humber, Peacock, Harrell to start, then a parade of youngsters from there. We knew Houston was going to be bad. But amazingly their rotation wasn’t the worst in the league, thanks to Jarred Cosart and Brett Olberholtzer coming up and pitching lights-out for 10 starts a piece later in the year. There’s some potential talent here.

(pre-season #24) Minnesota: Diamond, Pelfrey, Correia, Denudo, Worley and a whole slew of guys who were equally as bad. Minnesota had the worst rotation in the league, and it wasn’t close. They were dead last in rotational ERA, FIP, and xFIP, and it wasn’t close. They were last in K/9 … by more than a strikeout per game. They got a total fWAR of 4.6 from every pitcher who started a game for them this year. Matt Harvey had a 6.1 fWAR in just 26 starts before he got hurt. Someone needs to call the Twins GM and tell him that its not the year 1920, that power-pitching is the wave of the future, that you need swing-and-miss guys to win games in this league.

Biggest Surprises: Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Miami and New York Mets to a certain extent.

Biggest Disappointments: Toronto, the Angels, San Francisco, Philadelphia and Baltimore to some extent.

Disagree with these rankings? Feel free to pipe up. I’ll use this ranking list as the spring board post-FA market for 2014’s pre-season rankings.

Now that the playoff fields are set … who has the most formidable playoff rotation?

Unlike previous rotation rankings posts, the playoffs focus mostly on the 1-2-3 guys. Your 5th starter may not even be on the playoff roster and your 4th starter usually just throws one start in a series where you can line up your guys, and some teams skip the 4th starter altogether if they at least one veteran pitcher who can all go on 3 days rest (there’s enough off-days in the 2-3-2 format to allow most guys to go on regular rest). So the focus here is on the strength of your top guys.

Here’s how I’d rank the 10 playoff teams’ rotations, despite the fact that two of these teams will be wild card losers and never get a chance to use their rotations:

Los Angeles: Kershaw, Greinke, Nolasco, Ryu (Capuano left out). As great a 1-2 combination Kershaw and Greinke are, Nolasco has for stretches outpiched them both since his trade, and Ryu is a #2 starter talent in the #4 slot. They’re going to be a tough out in any short series where Kershaw gets two starts. Easily the #1 playoff rotation.

Detroit: Scherzer, Verlander, Sanchez, Fister (Porcello left out). Hard to believe that a guy who most thought was the best or 2nd best pitcher in baseball (Verlander) may not even get the start in the first game of the playoffs. But they’re still the 2nd best rotation.

St. Louis: Wainwright, Miller, Wacha, Kelly (Westbrook and Garcia hurt, Lynn left out). The knock on St Louis’ current rotation is their youth; two rookies and a 2nd year guy who was in the bullpen all last year. Are there any innings-limit concerns here that could force a shutdown It doesn’t seem so at this point? It continues to amaze me how well St. Louis develops players. Carpenter and Garcia out all year? No worries we’ll just bring up two guys in Wacha and Miller who are barely old enough to drink but who can pitch to a 120 ERA+.

Tampa Bay: Price, Moore, Archer, Cobb (Hellickson left out); A tough top 4, if a little young on the back-side. Moore has quietly returned to this dominant form upon his call-up and gives Tampa a formidable 1-2 punch. Price has already pushed them past game 163.

Pittsburgh: Liriano, Burnett, Cole, Morton (Rodriguez hurt, Locke left out). The team previously said that Cole would likely a reliever in the playoffs, but I’ll believe that when I see it; he’s been fantastic down the stretch. It is difficult to put a rotation headlined by the burnout Burnett and the reclamation project Liriano this high, but their performances this year are inarguable.

Boston: Lester, Buchholz, Peavy, Lackey (Dempster, Doubront left out). Buchholz just returning mid September after a hot start; could push this rank up. I don’t necessarily trust the #3 and #4 spots here in a short series, but Boston can (and probably will) bash their way to the World Series.

Cincinnati: Bailey, Cueto, Arroyo, Cingrani (Leake left out, Latos hurt). Cingrani may be hurt, Cueto has returned to replace the sore-armed Latos. Leake’s performance may push him over Arroyo if they get there, but the odds of them beating Pittsburgh were already slim after their poor finish and were vanquished last night. Still, isn’t it nice when you have more quality starters than you need heading into a season, Mike Rizzo?

Atlanta: Minor, Medlen, Teheran, Wood (Hudson hurt, Maholm left out). If Wood is shutdown, Maholm makes sense as the #4 starter but has struggled most of the 2nd half and finished poorly. I may have this rotation ranked too low; they’re solid up and down, just not overpoweringly flashy.

Cleveland: Jimenez, Kluber, Kazmir, Salazar (Masterson in the pen, McAllister left out). How did these guys get a playoff spot? Amazing. They’re all solid, nobody especially flashy, and they won’t go away.

Oakland: Colon, Parker, Griffen, Gray (Milone, Straily left out, Anderson in long relief). I didn’t want to rank them last, considering Oakland’s record over their last 162 game stretch. But here they are; on an individual level one by one, they just do not stack up. The age-less wonder Colon is easily the staff Ace. The rest of these guys’ seasonal numbers are just not impressive.

These teams obviously didn’t make the playoffs, but were in the hunt until late, and since I had already typed up this content might as well say where I’d have ranked them, had they made the playoffs…

Washington: Strasburg, Gonzalez, Zimmermann, Haren (Ohlendorf, Roark left out, Jordan shut down) Perhaps you’d replace Haren with Roark based on September performances; I just can’t imagine trusting Haren in a 7 game series.. I’d put them about #4, just ahead or just behind Tampa. Gonzalez and Zimmermann have shown themselves to be oddly vulnerable here and there coming down the stretch, and I just don’t put Strasburg in the same elite category as Kershaw right now. Too bad months of indifference cost them the 4 games they needed to make up in the standings to reach the WC game.

Kansas City: Shields, Santana, Chen, Guthrie (Duffy, Davis, Mendoza left out): Duffy may be a better choice than Guthrie based on small sample sizes. I’d have put them just behind Cincy at #8 in terms of rotation depth.

Texas: Darvish, Garza, Holland, Perez (Tepisch, Grimm left out, Harrison hurt): Great Ace in Darvish (even if he has occasaional blowups), but falls off badly after that. The Garza acquisition has just not worked out, and the rest of the rotation is good but not overpowering. I’d put them behind KC but just ahead of Baltimore.

New York: Sabathia, Kuroda, Nova, Pettitte (Hughes, Phelps left out): Kuroda has been the ace of the staff this year, but you’d always lead off with Sabathia (though, had they made the playoffs it would be unknown if Sabathia could even go with his late-season injury). Either way, this would be behind any other playoff team’s rotation.