The President as Military King

by

"PHILADELPHIENSIS", who was influenced by Thomas Paine (in
"Common Sense), wrote the following selection. It is taken from 3 essays
which appearing February 6 & 20, and April 9 of 1788 in either The Freeman's
Journal or, The North-American Intelligencer.

Before martial law is declared to be the supreme law of the land, and your
character of free citizens be changed to that of the subjects of a military
king—which are necessary consequences of the adoption of the proposed
constitution—let me admonish you in the name of sacred liberty, to make a
solemn pause. Permit a freeman to address you, and to solicit your attention to
a cause wherein yourselves and your posterity are concerned. The sun never shone
upon a more important one. It is the cause of freedom of a whole continent of
yourselves and of your fellow men.…

A conspiracy against the freedom of America, both deep and dangerous, has
been formed by an infernal junto of demagogues. Our thirteen free commonwealths
are to be consolidated into one despotic monarchy. Is not this position obvious?
Its evidence is intuitive .… Who can deny but the president general will be
a king to all intents and purposes, and one of the most dangerous kind too—a
king elected to command a standing army. Thus our laws are to be administered by
this tyrant; for the whole, or at least the most important part of the executive
department is put in his hands.

A quorum of 65 representatives, and of 26 senators, with a king at their
head, are to possess powers that extend to the lives, the liberties, and
property of every citizen of America. This novel system of government, were it
possible to establish it, would be a compound of monarchy and aristocracy, the
most accursed that ever the world witnessed. About 50 (these being a quorum) of
the well born, and a military king, with a standing army devoted to his will,
are to have an uncontrolled power.…

There is not a tincture of democracy in the proposed constitution, except the
nominal elections of the president general and the illustrious Congress be
supposed to have some color of that nature. But this is a mere deception,
invented to gull the people into its adoption. Its framers were well aware that
some appearance of election ought to be observed, especially in regard to the
first Congress; for without such an appearance there was not the smallest
probability of their having it organized and set in operation. But let the
wheels of this government be once cleverly set in motion, and I'll answer for
it, that the people shall not be much troubled with future elections, especially
in choosing their king—the standing army will do that business for them.

The thoughts of a military officer possessing such powers, as the proposed
constitution vests in the president general, are sufficient to excite in the
mind of a freeman the most alarming apprehensions; and ought to rouse him to
oppose it at all events. Every freeman of America ought to hold up this idea to
himself: that he has no superior but God and the laws. But this tyrant will be
so much his superior, that he can at any time he thinks proper, order him out in
the militia to exercise, and to march when and where he pleases. His officers
can wantonly inflict the most disgraceful punishment on a peaceable citizen,
under pretense of disobedience, or the smallest neglect of militia duty.…

The President-general, who is to be our king after this government is
established, is vested with powers exceeding those of the most despotic monarch
we know of in modern times. What a handsome return have these men [the authors
of the Constitution made to the people of America for their confidence! Through
the misconduct of these bold conspirators we have lost the most glorious
opportunity that any country ever had to establish a free system of government.
America under one purely democratical, would be rendered the happiest and most
powerful nation in the universe. But under the proposed one composed of an
elective king and a standing army, officered by his sycophants, the starvelings
of the Cincinnati, and an aristocratical Congress of the well-born—an iota of
happiness, freedom, or national strength cannot exist. What a pitiful figure
will these ungrateful men make in history; who, for the hopes of obtaining some
lucrative employment, or of receiving a little more homage from the rest of
their fellow creatures, framed a system of oppression that must involve in its
consequences the misery of their own offspring.…

Some feeble attempts have been made by the advocates of this system of
tyranny, to answer the objections made to the smallness of the number of
representatives and senators, and the improper powers delegated to them. But, as
far as I recollect, no one has been found bold enough to stand forth in defense
of that dangerous and uncontrolled officer, the President-General, or more
properly, our new King.

A few pieces under the signature of An American Citizen' were published
immediately after the Constitution broke the shell, and the hydra made its way
from the dark conclave into the open light. In the first number the writer, in
touching on the President, endeavored to conceal his immense powers, by
representing the King of Great Britain as possessed of many hereditary
prerogatives, rights and powers that he was not possessed of; that is, he shows
what he is not, but neglects to show what he really is. But so flimsy a
palliative could scarce escape the censure of the most ignorant advocate for
such an officer; and since [then] we hear of no further attempts to prove the
necessity of a King being set over the freemen of America.

The writer of these essays has clearly proven, that the President is a King
to all intents and purposes, and at the same time one of the most dangerous kind
too—an elective King, the commander in chief of a standing army, etc. And to
those add, that he has a negative power over the proceedings of both branches of
the legislature. And to complete his uncontrolled sway, he is neither restrained
nor assisted by a privy council, which is a novelty in government. I challenge
the politicians of the whole continent to find in any period of history a
monarch more absolute.…