Seaborne Says It’s Evaluating Legal Options For ‘Unruly Passengers’

ST. CROIX — Seaborne Airlines has responded to an incident that occurred on Saturday at its St. Croix seaplane terminal, which caused the airline to ultimate cancel a flight planned for St. Thomas. In a statement issued to The Consortium on Sunday, the company said it was seeking legal options for what it referred to as “unruly passengers,” and gave several accounts of the incident that run contrary to what passengers of the canceled flight said.

(Full disclosure: Seaborne Airlines is an advertising partner of The Virgin Islands Consortium.)

In its statement, Seaborne said safety of its customers remains its number 1 priority, and its policy would “never be compromised.” Seaborne then said that “passenger load” caused the plane to be overweight, which required the removal of “several passengers and bags for re-accommodation.”

“As is normal procedure, we asked for volunteers in exchange for compensation, but several individuals became unruly with both employees and other customers. Ultimately, the passengers interfered with both our ground and flight crew, a violation of federal law which required Seaborne to request the involvement of authorities. Seaborne is evaluating legal options with regard to this incident, and will be providing compensation for entitled passengers that were adversely impacted,” reads the statement.

But affected passengers on the scene of the incident at the St. Croix terminal on Saturday made it a point in letting the media know that Seaborne did not call the authorities; the affected passengers did. And the airline said the overweight forced it to remove passengers from the plane, but it never acknowledged that luggage of Seaborne customers not traveling on the overweight flight were on board the seaplane as well, and that the affected customers had suggested that Seaborne remove the luggage and allow the scheduled passengers to travel.

The incident has angered the community, with a video posted on The Consortium’s Facebook platform being viewed by over 28,000 people at time of publishing of this story, with over 200 comments and 300 post shares. The story has also garnered strong attention on The Consortium’s website.

According to an affected customer, who was headed to St. Thomas to attend the Tarrus Rileyconcert, and asked not to be named, when the customers arrived to Seaborne on Saturday, employees notified those booked to travel that the plane was over its weight limit and therefore customers would not be allowed to bring along their checked luggage; only carry-on luggage would be allowed.

Customers then improvised, putting important items in the bag that they were allowed to carry, while leaving other items behind.

“After we did all of that, they then told us that they were still 210 pounds overweight, and that they needed somebody to get off the flight,” the customer said. Seaborne said anyone who volunteered would get a one-way ticket, but no one took the offer because it was deemed insufficient for the inconvenience that the airline had caused.

Seaborne then said that if no one would volunteer, it would be forced to bump one of two customers that Seaborne said were the last two to board. “But really they weren’t the last two,” the customer said, explaining that three customers had checked in after one of the customers that Seaborne said had checked in last, and the other customer was waiting on a bag to pack items into, as per Seaborne’s notification that the plane was overweight and customers would have to improvise.

The two affected customers, who had booked a car rental and hotel room in St. Thomas to attend the Tarrus Riley concert, said they would not stay on St. Croix; they were to meetup with another couple in St. Thomas, according to the customer.

“So that turned into, you know, people starting to speak loudly and all that kind of stuff,” the customer said. By then, two hours had already passed as the negotiations continued. Customers requested of Seaborne that they send some of the luggage that did not belong to the passengers set to make the trip but were loaded onto the plane anyway, through the airport. Seaborne turned down the suggestion, according to the customer.

As the debacle continued, Seaborne said that it would simply leave with the people already on the plane, but customers then moved to block the departure area and demanded that everyone be accommodated. Customers also called police to deal with the matter because of the escalation.

When a Consortium reporter arrived to the area, police had already deescalated the confrontation, and were mediating between a Seaborne operations manager and the affected travelers. The officer encouraged the involved parties to move away from the departure area and to the counter, where travel plans were to be changed. Seaborne cancelled the flight, citing safety risk as the reason. “But there were people who were here quietly and peacefully waiting to get on their flight, so now they’re going to be penalized for everybody else,” the customer said.

“I think one of the problems that we had was that they told us that they had weight restrictions so our luggage couldn’t go on. But we saw them putting on luggage of other people because we knew the luggage didn’t belong to us –that’s what caused people to be more upset: If our friend can’t fly, if our luggage can’t go, then how come other people’s luggage getting to go? And then they were refusing to remove the luggage so that we could all travel,” said the customer.

Ernice Gilbert
I wear many hats, I suppose, but the one which fits me best would be journalism, second to that would be radio personality, thirdly singer/songwriter and down the line. I've been the Editor-In-Chief at my videogames website, Gamesthirst, for over 5 years, writing over 7,000 articles and more than 2 million words.
I'm also very passionate about where I live, the United States Virgin Islands, and I'm intent on making it a better place by being resourceful and keeping our leaders honest. VI Consortium was birthed out of said desire, hopefully my efforts bear fruit. Reach me at ernice@viconsortium.com.

That’s what happens with a monopoly. .take it or leave it…you will be back anyway!

shadowfax

It’s a safety issue. An overweight plane is not a good thing.
However, they could’ve handled it in a better manner than they did.

afterwhilecrocodile

An overweight issue can have devastating consequences like in August 2001 Aaliyah at the age of 22 got on a small plane that was overweight and the plane crashed leaving the airport……..
Everyone on board died…….

However, if service is so bad, then utilize other options to reach your destination…….

Dooreo

You are absolutely correct. Seaborn didn’t manage the situation well, but they also didn’t kill anyone.

3404ever

And if I recall the plane was only a few hundred pound over weight. even a little overweight is too much, don’t mess around with weights.

barnya

Then Jettison the Damn Luggage for a later flight, dumbasses . We are all accustomed to missing and delayed luggage anyway.

Chief

When you are checking in, they ask you what’s your weight, they also weigh your bag at the same time. This should have given the airline an indication of weight limit at check-in, not when boarding.

gary s pokorny

So transporting someone else’s luggage IS more important to Seaborne than paying passengers. Did they even acknowledge the policy in the release? Can’t find it on-line? Ernie, can you post a link? They took no responsibility for the situation. Competition is when capitalism works best.
Amazon wins = Sears loses. UBER wins = taxis lose. Hopefully, Hummingbird and Sea Flight know this – serve customers before
luggage.

Dooreo

Yes, the luggage belonging to a customer who has already flown IS more important. If you were at your destination waiting on yor luggage, you know how much you would complain if it didn’t show up. Seaborn should have scheduled another plane to carry bags and packages if it were necessary. That’s the problem.

Dooreo

Protesting operations is one matter, while obstructing operations is quite another. Understand the difference, people.
No arugument, Seaborn mismanaged the situation with booking and ticketing, but they have the right to prosecute anyone who may have directly interfered with the operation of the airline.

I’m just saying

You’ll need to loose some weight and stop eating so many plates of food.

Me

People like you are the reason we in the VI are treated like morons. You to grow the hell up.

Vi2828

Seaborne is by far the worst airline in the usvi. They constantly bump paying costumers off of flights, they overcharge for everything and let’s not get started on their costumer service.

Dave

Only in the VI. In the 2 hours that everyone was arguing, the plane could have made two round-trips between St. Croix and St. Thomas, and taken everyone and all the bags during those 2 hours. Did that occur to Seaborne or the passengers? Obviously, not. So dumb.

barnya

The only legal options they should be evaluating is filing for bankruptcy and getting the hell out of the territory. They already abandoned their St. Croix headquarters when GERS made them pay back their multi-million dollar loan which they were welching on. But yet they are still flying in here sucking the money out of a poor government and a poor people. Vulture Capitalism indeed! Let them move on to the South Pacific and continue their preditory ways!

3404ever

Some of these passengers were morons. Complaining and yelling at the check in agents is one thing but interfering with a flight departure and a crew and crawling around on the plane is a federal crime. George is correct, These people need to be charged. It is the lack of respect of authority and no fear of consequence that some passengers acted like this and yes a pilot is an authority figure. This will happen again if no one is charged. Not defending Seaborne because they did handle the original issue completely wrong.

Dan Johnston

There is only so much crap that folks can take before they explode. Sadly companies like Seaborne have become the norm. Like Leornard Cohen said “I have seen the future, brother and it is murder”.