nmm 22 4500ICPSR35169MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35169MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II in the United States, 2013 (Restricted Use)
[electronic resource]
Dana Hunt
2014-08-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35169NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II, 2013 is a collection of interview and bioassay data provided by over 3000 arrestees from five county sites within the United States. Under the sponsorship of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), the ADAM II program monitors drug use and related behaviors (treatment experiences, housing stability, drug market activity, age at first use, employment, etc.) in a probability based sample of male adult arrestees within 48 hours of their arrest. The five ADAM II sites for 2013 were: Atlanta, GA (Fulton County and the City of Atlanta); Chicago, IL (Cook County); Denver, CO (Denver County); New York, NY (Borough of Manhattan); and Sacramento, CA (Sacramento County). The 2013 survey represents the seventh year of ADAM II and includes data from 1,900 interviews and 1,681 urine tests that were conducted at the five ADAM II sites over a 21-day period, between May 5, 2013 and July 28, 2013. ADAM II data include official records, arrestee responses from a 20-minute face-to-face interview, and results from voluntary urine samples which tested for the presence of nine different drugs. Identifying information on the arrestees was not retained or shared with law enforcement. Demographic variables include age, gender, race, citizenship, marital status, arrest date and time, county of arrest, number and type(s) of offense(s), education, work status, and language of interview.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35169.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsrarrest recordsicpsrarrestsicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug useicpsrimprisonmenticpsrjailsicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrurinalysisicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorHunt, DanaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35169Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35169.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35509MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35509MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2013
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2014-11-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35509NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2013 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For the 2008 survey, adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. In 2008, a split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions (WHODAS vs. SDS) to assess impairment due to mental health problems. Beginning with the 2009 NSDUH, however, all of the adults in the sample received only the WHODAS questions. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35509.v1
addictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrDSDR III. Health and MortalitySAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD I. CrimeRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35509Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35509.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35335MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35335MiAaIMiAaI
Korean General Social Survey (KGSS), 2012
[electronic resource]
Sang-Wook Kim
2014-10-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35335NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Korean General Social Survey (KGSS) is the South Korean version of the General Social Survey (GSS), closely replicating the original GSS of the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. Each round of the KGSS typically includes the topical module surveys of the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP), and/or the East Asian Social Survey (EASS), an international survey network of four GSS-type surveys from countries in East Asia (including China, Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea). Respondents were asked about their trust of people and institutions, their opinions about Korean society, government performance, politics and political conditions, economic conditions, and voter participation. Additional questions were asked regarding social relationships, household and personal finances, women and family matters, household and family composition, occupation, internet usage, and respondent mental health. Demographic information includes age, sex, education level, household income, employment status, religious preference, political party affiliation, and political philosophy.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35335.v1
economic conditionsicpsreconomic policyicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrfamily structureicpsrgendericpsrlife eventsicpsrmarriageicpsrmental healthicpsroccupationsicpsrgender rolesicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrincome distributionicpsrinternet useicpsrorganizational structureicpsrpersonal financesicpsrpersonalityicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical expectationsicpsrpolitical ideologiesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpoliticsicpsrpsychological wellbeingicpsrreligious affiliationicpsrreligious beliefsicpsrsocial justiceicpsrsocial statusicpsrsocial valuesicpsrsocial welfareicpsrtrust (psychology)icpsrvoter attitudesicpsrwages and salariesicpsrIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesKim, Sang-WookInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35335Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35335.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34821MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34821MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II in the United States, 2012 (Restricted Use)
[electronic resource]
Dana Hunt
2013-08-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34821NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II, 2012 is a collection of interview and bioassay data provided by over 3000 arrestees from five county sites within the United States. Under the sponsorship of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), the ADAM II program monitors drug use and related behaviors (treatment experiences, housing stability, drug market activity, age at first use, employment, etc.) in a probability based sample of male adult arrestees within 48 hours of their arrest. The five ADAM II sites for 2012 were: Atlanta, GA (Fulton County and the City of Atlanta); Chicago, IL (Cook County); Denver, CO (Denver County); New York, NY (Borough of Manhattan); and Sacramento, CA (Sacramento County). The 2012 survey represents the sixth year of ADAM II and includes data from 1,938 interviews and 1,736 urine tests that were conducted at the five ADAM II sites over a 21-day period, between April 30 and July 29, 2012. The samples from these sites were weighted to represent over 14,000 arrests of adult males in the five counties. ADAM II data include official records, arrestee responses from a 20-minute face-to-face interview, and results from voluntary urine samples which tested for the presence of nine different drugs. Identifying information on the arrestees was not retained or shared with law enforcement. Demographic variables include age, gender, race, arrest date and time, county of arrest, number and type(s) of offense(s), education, work status, and language of interview.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34821.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsrarrest recordsicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug useicpsrimprisonmenticpsrjailsicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrurinalysisicpsrICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemHunt, DanaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34821Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34821.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34672MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34672MiAaIMiAaI
Collaborative National Network Examining Comparative Effectiveness Trials (CoNNECT) in 12 U.S. States, August 2010-July 2012
[electronic resource]
Benjamin F. Miller
2013-09-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34672NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Purpose.
The CoNNECT Project enables comparative effectiveness research on mental health, behavioral health, and substance use in primary care. CoNNECT tracked two main elements: (1) the number of patients identified with a comorbid mental health and physical health diagnosis; (2) the number of patients who initiate treatment secondary to a mental health diagnosis. CoNNECT created the capacity to build a base for mental health in primary care comparative effectiveness research using electronic connectivity to generate retrospective and in time prospective clinical data.
Data Access.
CoNNECT data are not available from ICPSR. The data from this study are hosted at DARTNet.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34672.v1
anxietyicpsrasthmaicpsrcardiovascular diseaseicpsrchronic illnessesicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdiabetesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth careicpsrhypertensionicpsrmental healthicpsrobesityicpsrpatientsicpsrprimary careicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtreatmenticpsrAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesAHRQMCC II. AHRQMCC Supported StudiesMiller, Benjamin F.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34672Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34672.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR23380MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR23380MiAaIMiAaI
Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (HOS), 1998-2012
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
2014-11-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR23380NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (HOS) is the first patient reported health outcomes measure for the Medicare population in managed care settings. It is a continuous study that measures the physical and mental health and well-being of Medicare beneficiaries over a two-year period. Starting in 1998, a baseline survey was administered to a new cohort of respondents each year in the spring and a follow-up survey was conducted of those same respondents two years later. Cohorts 1-5 include the Baseline Data, the Follow-Up Data, and the Analytic Data file, which contains the merged Baseline and Follow-Up files along with supplemental variables. Beginning with Cohort 6, the Follow-Up Data were included only in the Analytic file. The HOS consists of the SF-36 Health Survey, which yields physical and mental health summary measures, as well as questions on topics such as chronic medical conditions, activities of daily living (ADLs), depression, smoking, physical health symptoms, weight and height, and additional questions corresponding to HEDIS (Health Care Employer Data and Information Set) measures such as urinary incontinence in older adults, osteoporosis testing in older women, and fall risk management. In 2006, CMS implemented the Medicare HOS 2.0 for Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs) which evaluates physical and mental health status using the Veteran RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12). The revised instrument contains questions that gather information for case-mix and risk-adjustment variables, and collects information on respondents' physical functioning, bodily pain, social functioning, mental health, vitality, general health, and how respondents' physical and emotional health affects their lives. The survey includes case-mix adjustment variables which may be used to adjust the survey response data for beneficiary characteristics that are known to be related to systematic biases in the way people respond to survey questions. Demographic information includes respondent's age, gender, race, education level, marital status, annual household income, and geographic region.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23380.v2
activities of daily livingicpsrchronic disabilitiesicpsrchronic illnessesicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdisabilitiesicpsrdisabled personsicpsremotional problemsicpsrhealthicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth statusicpsrmedical careicpsrMedicareicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrphysical characteristicsicpsrphysical conditionicpsrphysical limitationsicpsrsmokingicpsrtreatment outcomeicpsrICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsNACDA VI. Health Care Needs, Utilization, and Financing for Older AdultsUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid ServicesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)23380Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23380.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35037MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35037MiAaIMiAaI
Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A), 2012
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2014-05-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35037NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A) is a national census data system of annual admissions to substance abuse treatment facilities. TEDS-A provides annual data on the number and characteristics of persons admitted to public and private substance abuse treatment programs that receive public funding. The unit of analysis is a treatment admission. TEDS consists of data reported to state substance abuse agencies by the treatment programs, which in turn report it to SAMHSA.
A sister data system, called the Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D), collects data on discharges from substance abuse treatment facilities. The first year of TEDS-A data is 1992, while the first year of TEDS-D is 2006.
TEDS variables that are required to be reported are called the "Minimum Data Set (MDS)", while those that are optional are called the "Supplemental Data Set (SuDS)".
Variables in the MDS include: information on service setting, number of prior treatments, primary source of referral, gender, race, ethnicity, education, employment status, substance(s) abused, route of administration, frequency of use, age at first use, and whether methadone was prescribed in treatment. Supplemental variables include: diagnosis codes, presence of psychiatric problems, living arrangements, source of income, health insurance, expected source of payment, pregnancy and veteran status, marital status, detailed not in labor force codes, detailed criminal justice referral codes, days waiting to enter treatment, and the number of arrests in the 30 days prior to admissions (starting in 2008).
Substances abused include alcohol, cocaine and crack, marijuana and hashish, heroin, nonprescription methadone, other opiates and synthetics, PCP, other hallucinogens, methamphetamine, other amphetamines, other stimulants, benzodiazepines, other non-benzodiazepine tranquilizers, barbiturates, other non-barbiturate sedatives or hypnotics, inhalants, over-the-counter medications, and other substances.
Created variables include total number of substances reported, intravenous drug use (IDU), and flags for any mention of specific substances.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35037.v1
alcohol abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrinterventionicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesSAMHDA III. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS)United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35037Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35037.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34802MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34802MiAaIMiAaI
General Social Survey, 1972-2012 [Cumulative File]
[electronic resource]
Tom W. Smith
,
Michael Hout
,
Peter V. Marsden
2013-09-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34802NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The General Social Surveys (GSS) were designed as part of a data diffusion project in 1972. The GSS replicated questionnaire items and wording in order to facilitate time-trend studies. The latest survey, GSS 2012, includes a cumulative file that merges all 29 General Social Surveys into a single file containing data from 1972 to 2012. The items appearing in the surveys are one of three types: Permanent questions that occur on each survey, rotating questions that appear on two out of every three surveys (1973, 1974, and 1976, or 1973, 1975, and 1976), and a few occasional questions such as split ballot experiments that occur in a single survey. The 2012 surveys included seven topic modules: Jewish identity, generosity, workplace violence, science, skin tone, and modules for experimental and miscellaneous questions. The International Social Survey Program (ISSP) module included in the 2012 survey was gender. The data also contain several variables describing the demographic characteristics of the respondents.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34802.v1
immigrationicpsrincomeicpsrindustryicpsrJewsicpsrabortionicpsrAffirmative ActionicpsragricultureicpsrAIDSicpsraltruismicpsrbirth controlicpsrbusinessicpsrcapital punishmenticpsrchildrenicpsrcitizenshipicpsrcivil rightsicpsrcommunismicpsrcommunity participationicpsrcompensationicpsrcomputer useicpsrcorporationsicpsrcourtsicpsrcrimeicpsrdemocracyicpsrdissenticpsrdivorceicpsrdrug useicpsreconomic issuesicpsremploymenticpsrenvironmenticpsrenvironmental attitudesicpsrenvironmental protectionicpsrethnicityicpsreuthanasiaicpsrexpendituresicpsrfamiliesicpsrforeign affairsicpsrfreedomicpsrgendericpsrgender issuesicpsrgender rolesicpsralcoholicpsrgovernmenticpsrhealthicpsrhousingicpsrhuman rightsicpsrhuntingicpsrlabor unionsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmarriageicpsrmedia coverageicpsrmental healthicpsrmilitary drafticpsrmilitary serviceicpsrnational identityicpsroccupationsicpsrparentsicpsrpatientsicpsrphysiciansicpsrpoliceicpsrpoliticsicpsrpovertyicpsrprejudiceicpsrprivacyicpsrrace relationsicpsrracial attitudesicpsrreligionicpsrschool prayericpsrscienceicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsexual preferenceicpsrsmokingicpsrsocial classesicpsrsocial inequalityicpsrsocial mobilityicpsrsocial networksicpsrSocial Securityicpsrsportsicpsrsuicideicpsrtaxesicpsrtechnologyicpsrtelevisionicpsrterminal illnessesicpsrterrorismicpsrunemploymenticpsrwelfare servicesicpsrworkicpsrworkplace violenceicpsrICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United StatesNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramSmith, Tom W.Hout, MichaelMarsden, Peter V.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34802Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34802.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25221MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25221MiAaIMiAaI
Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A) -- Concatenated, 1992 to 2012
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality.
2014-09-23Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR25221NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A) is a national census data system of annual admissions to substance abuse treatment facilities. TEDS-A provides annual data on the number and characteristics of persons admitted to public and private substance abuse treatment programs that receive public funding. The unit of analysis is a treatment admission. TEDS consists of data reported to state substance abuse agencies by the treatment programs, which in turn report it to SAMHSA.
A sister data system, called the Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D), collects data on discharges from substance abuse treatment facilities. The first year of TEDS-A data is 1992, while the first year of TEDS-D is 2006.
TEDS variables that are required to be reported are called the "Minimum Data Set (MDS)", while those that are optional are called the "Supplemental Data Set (SuDS)".
Variables in the MDS include: information on service setting, number of prior treatments, primary source of referral, gender, race, ethnicity, education, employment status, substance(s) abused, route of administration, frequency of use, age at first use, and whether methadone was prescribed in treatment. Supplemental variables include: diagnosis codes, presence of psychiatric problems, living arrangements, source of income, health insurance, expected source of payment, pregnancy and veteran status, marital status, detailed not in labor force codes, detailed criminal justice referral codes, days waiting to enter treatment, and the number of arrests in the 30 days prior to admissions (starting in 2008) .
Substances abused include alcohol, cocaine and crack, marijuana and hashish, heroin, nonprescription methadone, other opiates and synthetics, PCP, other hallucinogens, methamphetamine, other amphetamines, other stimulants, benzodiazepines, other non-benzodiazepine tranquilizers, barbiturates, other non-barbiturate sedatives or hypnotics, inhalants, over-the-counter medications, and other substances.
Created variables include total number of substances reported, intravenous drug use (IDU), and flags for any mention of specific substances.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25221.v9
alcohol abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrinterventionicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingSAMHDA III. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS)ICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25221Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25221.v9 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34933MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34933MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2012
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2015-01-22Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34933NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2012 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For the 2008 survey, adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. In 2008, a split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions (WHODAS vs. SDS) to assess impairment due to mental health problems. Beginning with the 2009 NSDUH, however, all of the adults in the sample received only the WHODAS questions. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34933.v2
employmenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsraddictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeDSDR III. Health and MortalityRCMD I. CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34933Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34933.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34362MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34362MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II in the United States, 2011
[electronic resource]
Dana Hunt
2013-06-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34362NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II, 2011, is a collection of interview and bioassay data on over 5000 arrestees in 10 United States counties within 48 hours of their arrest. The collection took place between April 1 and September 30, 2011 and represents the fifth year of ADAM II data collection under the sponsorship of the Office of National Drug Control Policy.
The 10 current ADAM II sites are: Atlanta, GA (Fulton County); Charlotte, NC (Mecklenburg County); Chicago, IL (Cook County); Denver, CO (Denver County); Indianapolis, IN (Marion County); Minneapolis, MN (Hennepin County); New York, NY (Borough of Manhattan); Portland, OR (Multnomah County); Sacramento, CA (Sacramento County); and Washington, DC (District of Columbia).
In 2011, 5,051 interviews and 4,412 urine tests were conducted in the 10 ADAM II sites over 14 consecutive days in each of two calendar quarters between April 1 and September 30. The samples across these sites represent 35,459 adult males arrested in the 10 sites during the data collection period. Demographic variables include arrest date and time, gender, date of birth, number and types of offenses, county of arrest, race, education, work status, and language of interview.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34362.v1
criminal historiesicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug useicpsrimprisonmenticpsrjailsicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrurinalysisicpsrADAM/DUF Programicpsrarrest recordsicpsrICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemHunt, DanaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34362Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34362.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34469MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34469MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/New York Times September 11th Families Poll, August #3, 2011
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
The New York Times
2013-01-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34469NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, fielded August 2011, and the third of four, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on a range of political and social issues. This poll surveyed respondents who, in a previous poll, had identified themselves as family members or friends of individuals killed in the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. Details were sought regarding each respondent's relationship to a victim, whether the person was a first responder, and whether the person died at the Pentagon, the World Trade Center, or aboard the flight that crashed in Pennsylvania. Respondents were asked whether they had formed any close friendships with family members or friends of other victims, whether first responders and families of victims had been fairly compensated, and whether they felt their loved one had been properly memorialized. Surveyors also inquired on general aspects of respondents' lives since the attacks, including whether they had recovered financially and emotionally, whether they had suffered from a diagnosed mental health issue, and whether the events had caused them to change jobs or move their place of residence. Furthermore, respondents were asked to gauge the likelihood of another attack within the upcoming months, and whether they believed security initiatives implemented following the terrorist attacks had enhanced public safety at airports, bridges, tunnels, subways, and nuclear power plants. Opinions were also collected regarding United States military campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan. Additional questions solicited views on Mayor Rudolph Giuliani's handling of the attack on the World Trade Center, on the planned redevelopment of the site at Ground Zero, and on the proposed mosque and Islamic community center two blocks from Ground Zero. Demographic information includes sex, age, race, marital status, education level, household income, religious preference, and political party affiliation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34469.v1
Afghanistan Waricpsrairport securityicpsrbin Laden, OsamaicpsrGiuliani, RudolphicpsrIraq Waricpsrmental healthicpsrMuslimsicpsrpatriotismicpsrpublic opinionicpsrsecurityicpsrSeptember 11 attackicpsrterrorismicpsrterrorist attacksicpsrterrorist threaticpsrTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsThe New York TimesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34469Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34469.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34470MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34470MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/New York Times/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Poll, August #4, 2011
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
The New York Times
,
60 Minutes
,
Vanity Fair
2013-01-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34470NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, the last of four fielded August 2011, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on a range of political and social issues. This poll primarily featured questions related to acts of international terrorism perpetrated within the United States. Respondents were asked whether they felt the United States had changed as a result of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, whether they felt the country was as patriotic and united as it was immediately following the attacks, and whether Americans would have to live with the threat of terrorism indefinitely. Respondents were also asked to gauge the likelihood of an imminent attack, whether they felt safe from the threat of terrorism, and whether the threat of a future terrorist attack is higher in New York City compared to other American cities. Respondents were asked whether they felt the federal government had done enough to prevent future attacks, whether the government had gone too far in restricting civil liberties in its fight against terrorism, and whether they would be willing to allow government agencies to monitor telephone calls and emails of suspicious persons and those of the general public. Furthermore, respondents were asked whether security initiatives implemented following the terrorist attacks had enhanced public safety at airports, bridges, tunnels, subways, and nuclear power plants. Opinions were also collected on whether United States military campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq had decreased the threat of terrorism, whether the United States was winning the war on terrorism, and whether the killing of Osama bin Laden had provided a sense of closure and increased safety. Further information was collected regarding respondents feelings toward Muslims following the September 11th attacks, whether respondents believed Muslims were being unfairly singled out within society, and whether they believed Muslims and Arab Americans were more sympathetic to terrorists than other American citizens. Additional questions fielded for the 60 Minutes and Vanity Fair portion of the poll solicited opinions on United States relations with Russia, Yemen, China, Cuba, Saudi Arabia, and Israel. The poll also featured a number of questions on American popular culture that were unrelated to the subject of terrorism. Demographic information included sex, age, race, marital status, education level, employment status, household income, religious preference, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), political party affiliation, political philosophy, number of phones, voter registration status, whether respondents were members of the Tea Party movement, and whether the respondents thought of themselves as born-again Christians.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34470.v1
Afghanistan Waricpsraircraft securityicpsrairport securityicpsrArab Americansicpsrattitudesicpsrbin Laden, Osamaicpsrcivil rightsicpsrGiuliani, Rudolphicpsrinternational relationsicpsrIraq Waricpsrmental healthicpsrMuslimsicpsrparty identificationicpsrpatriotismicpsrpolitical philosophyicpsrpublic opinionicpsrracial profilingicpsrsecurityicpsrSeptember 11 attackicpsrsurveillanceicpsrterrorismicpsrterrorist attacksicpsrTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsThe New York Times60 MinutesVanity FairInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34470Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34470.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35334MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35334MiAaIMiAaI
Korean General Social Survey (KGSS), 2011
[electronic resource]
Sang-Wook Kim
2014-11-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35334NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Korean General Social Survey (KGSS) is the South Korean version of the General Social Survey (GSS), closely replicating the original GSS of the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. Each round of the KGSS typically includes the topical module surveys of the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP), and/or the East Asian Social Survey (EASS), an international survey network of four GSS-type surveys from countries in East Asia (including China, Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea). Respondents were asked about their trust of people and institutions, their opinions about Korean society, economic conditions, government performance, and labor unions. Additional questions were asked regarding the health care system, respondents' health behaviors, medical treatment, human rights, attitudes toward aging and the elderly, household composition and household income. Demographic information collected includes age, sex, education level, household income, employment status, religious preference, political party affiliation, and political philosophy.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35334.v1
age discriminationicpsragingicpsraging populationicpsrattitudesicpsrattitudes toward agingicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreducationicpsreducational backgroundicpsremotional problemsicpsremotional supporticpsremploymenticpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfamily sizeicpsrfamily structureicpsrgovernmenticpsrgovernment performanceicpsrgovernment servicesicpsrhealthicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth care accessicpsrhealth care costsicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrhealth problemsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrhuman rightsicpsrincomeicpsrincome distributionicpsrlabor unionsicpsrmental healthicpsrminoritiesicpsrnational prideicpsroccupational categoriesicpsroccupationsicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrreligionicpsrreligious behavioricpsrschool attendanceicpsrtrust (psychology)icpsrtrust in governmenticpsrvoter attitudesicpsrICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataKim, Sang-WookInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35334Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35334.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34542MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34542MiAaIMiAaI
North Carolina Integrated Data for Researchers (NCIDR)
[electronic resource]Merged Behavioral Health Data from Four Publicly-Funded Sources in North Carolina, July 2007-June 2011
C. Annette DuBard
2013-03-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34542NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
the Director of Evaluation at cjackson@n3cn.org to discuss his/her intent to submit a Request Form. Some may also need to complete the Data Use Agreement if requesting data that are not completely de-identified.
Although IRB approval must be documented prior to release of data, NCIDR will accept applications with conditional IRB approval and researchers may discuss projects with the Director of Evaluation at any stage of development. A Research Oversight Committee (ROC) that includes stake holders from the NC Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), the NC Division of Medical Assistance (DMA), the NC Division of State Operated Healthcare Facilities (DSOHF), the NC Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities and Substance Abuse Services (DMHDDSAS), the NC Office of Rural Health and Community Care (ORHCC), the Community Care of North Carolina (CCNC) and other community partners will review research requests and grant approval when applicable. Once approved, please note that CCNC must charge a nominal fee of $3,000 to cover costs related to the preparation and transmission of files to the researcher (additional charges may apply depending on the specific programming needs).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34542.v1
developmentally disabledicpsrhealthicpsrhealth careicpsrindigenticpsrMedicaidicpsrmedical careicpsrmedical recordsicpsrmental disordersicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrpatient careicpsrpatientsicpsrpsychiatric servicesicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatmenticpsrtreatment outcomeicpsruninsuredicpsrICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesAHRQMCC II. AHRQMCC Supported StudiesAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsDuBard, C. AnnetteInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34542Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34542.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34921MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34921MiAaIMiAaI
National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP)
[electronic resource]Wave 2 and Partner Data Collection
Linda J. Waite
,
Kathleen Cagney
,
William Dale
,
Elbert Huang
,
Edward O. Laumann
,
Martha McClintock
,
Colm A. O'Muircheartaigh
,
L. Phillip Schumm
,
Benjamin Cornwell
2014-04-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34921NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The health of older adults is influenced by many factors. One of the least understood is the role that social support and personal relationships may play in healthy aging. The National Social Life, Health and Aging Project (NSHAP) is the first population-based study of health and social factors on a national scale, aiming to understand the well-being of older, community-dwelling Americans by examining the interactions among physical health, illness, medication use, cognitive function, emotional health, sensory function, health behaviors, and social connectedness. It is designed to provide health providers, policy makers, and individuals with useful information and insights into these factors, particularly on social and intimate relationships. The National Opinion Research Center (NORC), along with Principal Investigators at the University of Chicago, conducted more than 3,000 interviews during 2005 and 2006 with a nationally representative sample of adults aged 57 to 85. Face-to-face interviews and biomeasure collection took place in respondents' homes. Wave 2 interviews were conducted from August 2010 through May 2011, during which Wave 1 respondents were re-interviewed. An attempt was also made to interview individuals who were sampled in Wave 1 but declined to participate. In addition, spouses or co-resident partners were also interviewed using the same instruments as the main respondents. This process resulted in 3,377 total respondents. The following files constitute Wave 2: Core Data, Social Networks Data, Social Networks Update Data, Partner History Data, Partner History Update Data, and Disposition of Wave 1 Partner Data.
Included in the Core file (Part 1) are demographic characteristics, such as gender, age, education, race, and ethnicity. Other topics covered respondents' social networks, social and cultural activity, physical and mental health including cognition, well-being, illness, history of sexual and intimate partnerships and patient-physician communication, in addition to bereavement items. In addition data was collected from respondents on the following items and modules: social activity items, physical contact module, sexual interest module, get up and go assessment of physical function and a panel of biomeasures including, weight, waist circumference, height, blood pressure, smell, saliva collection, taste, and a self-administered vaginal swab for female respondents. The Social Networks file (Part 2) contains one record for each person identified on the network roster. Respondents who refused to participate in the roster or who did not identify anyone are not represented in this file. The Social Networks Update file (Part 3) details respondents' current relationship status with each person identified on the network roster. The Partner History file (Part 4) contains one record for each marriage, cohabitation, or romantic relationship identified in Section 6A of the questionnaire, including a current partner in Wave 2 but excluding the partner from Wave 1. The Partner History Update file (Part 5) details respondents' current sexual partner information, as well as marital and cohabiting status. Lastly, the Disposition of Wave 1 Partner file (Part 6) details information derived from Section 6A items regarding the partner from Wave 1 within the questionnaire. This provides a complete history for respondent partners across both waves.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34921.v1
agingicpsranxietyicpsrattitudesicpsrbiomeasuresicpsrbody heighticpsrbody weighticpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdoctor visitsicpsrdrugsicpsrethnicityicpsrfamily sizeicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrhealth statusicpsrillnessicpsrintimate partnersicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmedical evaluationicpsrmedical proceduresicpsrmenopauseicpsrmental healthicpsrmorbidityicpsrnutritionicpsrolder adultsicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsocial networksicpsrsocial supporticpsrICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesDSDR IX. NIA Supported StudiesAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsDSDR III. Health and MortalityNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsWaite, Linda J.Cagney, KathleenDale, WilliamHuang, ElbertLaumann, Edward O.McClintock, MarthaO'Muircheartaigh, Colm A.Schumm, L. PhillipCornwell, BenjaminInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34921Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34921.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34312MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34312MiAaIMiAaI
Maternal Lifestyle Study in Four Sites in the United States, 1993-2011
[electronic resource]
Barry Lester
,
Henrietta Bada
,
Charles Bauer
,
Seetha Shankaran
,
Toni Whitaker
,
Linda LaGasse
,
Jane Hammond
2014-05-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34312NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
ental outcomes. Phase III followed children at 4, 4.5, 5, 6, and 7 years. In addition to outcomes examined in Phase II, school performance and neurodevelopmental measures of emotional and behavioral self-regulation were also examined. Phase IV covers ages 8, 9, 10, and 11 years of age. Outcomes in this phase were further expanded to include antisocial behavior, onset of substance use, psychopathology, and neuroendocrine function. Phase V assessed children at ages 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 years of age. The fifth phase of the study has a significant emphasis on psychopathology, school performance, peer relationships, substance use onset and risk taking behaviors, including risky sexual behaviors.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34312.v2
alcoholicpsrbirthicpsrchild developmenticpsrcocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug useicpsrmental healthicpsrmothersicpsrphysical conditionicpsrpregnancyicpsrrespiratory diseasesicpsrrisk factorsicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial environmenticpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorLester, BarryBada, HenriettaBauer, CharlesShankaran, SeethaWhitaker, ToniLaGasse, LindaHammond, JaneInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34312Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34312.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33444MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33444MiAaIMiAaI
Center for Education and Drug Abuse Research (CEDAR)
[electronic resource]Etiological and Prospective Family Study in Southwestern Pennsylvania, Baseline Data, 1990-2011
Ralph E. Tarter
2012-08-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR33444NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Center for Education and Drug Abuse Research (CEDAR) conducts research on 775 families enrolled in the Center's prospective investigations into the etiology of substance use disorder (SUD). The pro-bands are men with lifetime presence/absence of SUD consequent to use of an illicit drug who have a 10-12 year old biological son or daughter. The biological children of SUD men are assigned to the high average risk (HAR) group whereas offspring of men without SUD, having neither axis 1 disorder ("normal") nor SUD psychiatric disorder, are assigned to the low average risk (LAR) group. A second control group (Psych control) was also collected, in whom the fathers had a lifetime DSM-III-R diagnosis of any psychiatric disorder not related to substance use. The sample sizes are as follows: HAR = 344, LAR = 350, and Psych = 81. The children are currently in varying stages of follow-up evaluation conducted at ages 12-14, 16, 19, and annually thereafter until age 30. CEDAR has already shown that they can predict in 10-12 year old youth cannabis use disorder by age 22 with approximately 70 percent accuracy, thereby substantiating the paradigm, subject recruitment strategy, and measurement protocols. Multidisciplinary research is conducted on family members (father, mother, children) with the objective of elucidating the genetic, bio-behavioral, and environmental factors on development of SUD consequent to use of illegal drugs. Research protocols are organized into three thematically connected research modules (Neurogenetics, Developmental Psychopathology, and Translation) linking etiology and prevention.
The research components thus align with the NIH Roadmap model such that basic science informs clinical research leading to prevention guided by an understanding of etiology.
In addition to module-level research, faculty also participate in three organizational aims: (1) Devise a practical scale to quantify the transmissible liability to SUD; (2) Empirically test a bio-psychological theory of SUD etiology focusing on off-time maturation leading to psychological dysregulation predisposing to SUD; and, (3) Delineate SUD liability variants within an ontogenetic framework.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33444.v1
aptitudeicpsrattitudesicpsrchild healthicpsrchildrenicpsrcognitionicpsrcognitive functioningicpsrdomestic relationsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily relationsicpsrhealthicpsrmental healthicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrparentsicpsrparticipationicpsrpersonality assessmenticpsrpsychiatric servicesicpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrpsychological wellbeingicpsrpsychosocial assessmenticpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial lifeicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesTarter, Ralph E.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33444Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33444.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30122MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30122MiAaIMiAaI
Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D) -- Concatenated, 2006 to 2011
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2014-10-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR30122NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D) is a national census data system of annual discharges from substance abuse treatment facilities. TEDS-D provides annual data on the number and characteristics of persons discharged from public and private substance abuse treatment programs that receive public funding. Data collected both at admission and at discharge is included. The unit of analysis is a treatment discharge. TEDS-D consists of data reported to state substance abuse agencies by the treatment programs, which in turn report it to SAMHSA.
A sister data system, called the Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A), collects data on admissions to substance abuse treatment facilities. The first year of TEDS-A data is 1992, while the first year of TEDS-D is 2006.
TEDS-D variables that are required to be reported are called the "Minimum Data Set (MDS)", while those that are optional are called the "Supplemental Data Set (SuDS)".
Variables unique to TEDS-D, and not part of TEDS-A, are the length of stay, reason for leaving treatment, and service setting at time of discharge. TEDS-D also provides many of the same variables that exist in TEDS-A. This includes information on service setting, number of prior treatments, primary source of referral, gender, race, ethnicity, education, employment status, substance(s) abused, route of administration, frequency of use, age at first use, and whether methadone was prescribed in treatment. Supplemental variables include: diagnosis codes, presence of psychiatric problems, living arrangements, source of income, health insurance, expected source of payment, pregnancy and veteran status, marital status, detailed not in labor force codes, detailed criminal justice referral codes, days waiting to enter treatment, and the number of arrests in the 30 days prior to admissions (starting in 2008).
Substances abused include alcohol, cocaine and crack, marijuana and
hashish, heroin, nonprescription methadone, other opiates and
synthetics, PCP, other hallucinogens, methamphetamine, other amphetamines,
other stimulants, benzodiazepines, other non-benzodiazepine tranquilizers, barbiturates,
other non-barbiturate sedatives or hypnotics, inhalants, over-the-counter medications,
and other substances.
Created variables include total number
of substances reported, intravenous drug use (IDU), and flags for any
mention of specific substances.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30122.v4
alcohol abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrinterventionicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsrDSDR III. Health and MortalityRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingSAMHDA III. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS)ICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30122Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30122.v4 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35074MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35074MiAaIMiAaI
Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D), 2011
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2014-05-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35074NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D) is a national census data system of annual discharges from substance abuse treatment facilities. TEDS-D provides annual data on the number and characteristics of persons discharged from public and private substance abuse treatment programs that receive public funding. Data collected both at admission and at discharge is included. The unit of analysis is a treatment discharge. TEDS-D consists of data reported to state substance abuse agencies by the treatment programs, which in turn report it to SAMHSA.
A sister data system, called the Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A), collects data on admissions to substance abuse treatment facilities. The first year of TEDS-A data is 1992, while the first year of TEDS-D is 2006.
TEDS-D variables that are required to be reported are called the "Minimum Data Set (MDS)", while those that are optional are called the "Supplemental Data Set (SuDS)".
Variables unique to TEDS-D, and not part of TEDS-A, are the length of stay, reason for leaving treatment, and service setting at time of discharge. TEDS-D also provides many of the same variables that exist in TEDS-A. This includes information on service setting, number of prior treatments, primary source of referral, gender, race, ethnicity, education, employment status, substance(s) abused, route of administration, frequency of use, age at first use, and whether methadone was prescribed in treatment. Supplemental variables include: diagnosis codes, presence of psychiatric problems, living arrangements, source of income, health insurance, expected source of payment, pregnancy and veteran status, marital status, detailed not in labor force codes, detailed criminal justice referral codes, days waiting to enter treatment, and the number of arrests in the 30 days prior to admissions (starting in 2008).
Substances abused include alcohol, cocaine and crack, marijuana and
hashish, heroin, nonprescription methadone, other opiates and
synthetics, PCP, other hallucinogens, methamphetamine, other amphetamines,
other stimulants, benzodiazepines, other non-benzodiazepine tranquilizers, barbiturates, other non-barbiturate sedatives or hypnotics, inhalants, over-the-counter medications, and other substances.
Created variables include total number of substances reported, intravenous drug use (IDU), and flags for any mention of specific substances.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35074.v1
drug abuseicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrinterventionicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsralcohol abuseicpsrSAMHDA III. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS)DSDR III. Health and MortalityRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35074Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35074.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34315MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34315MiAaIMiAaI
The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA), 2009-2011
[electronic resource]
Rose Anne Kenny
2014-07-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34315NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) is a major inter-institutional initiative led by Trinity College Dublin which aims to produce a massive improvement in the quantity and quality of data, research and information relating to older people and ageing in Ireland. Eligible respondents for this study include individuals aged 50 and over and their spouses or partners of any age. The study involves interviews on a two yearly basis with a sample cohort of 8,504 people aged 50 and over (or their spouses/partners) and resident in Ireland, collecting detailed information on all aspects of their lives, including the economic (pensions, employment, living standards), health (physical, mental, service needs and usage) and social aspects (contact with friends and kin, formal and informal care, social participation). Both survey interviews and physical and biological measurements are utilized. Demographic and background variables include age, sex, marital status, household composition, education, and employment.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34315.v1
activities of daily livingicpsragingicpsrchildhoodicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrexerciseicpsreyesighticpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily lifeicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfamily structureicpsrfinancial supporticpsrfriendshipsicpsrhealthicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrhealth statusicpsrhearing (physiology)icpsrhome ownershipicpsrincomeicpsrjob descriptionsicpsrmemoryicpsrmental healthicpsrneighborsicpsrolder adultsicpsrpainicpsrpensionsicpsrquality of lifeicpsrrelativesicpsrreligionicpsrretirement planningicpsrsatisfactionicpsrsleepicpsrsmokingicpsrsocial networksicpsrstandard of livingicpsrtravelicpsrwages and salariesicpsrNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsICPSR I.B. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, Nations Other Than the United StatesKenny, Rose AnneInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34315Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34315.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04690MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04690MiAaIMiAaI
Americans' Changing Lives
[electronic resource]Waves I, II, III, IV, and V, 1986, 1989, 1994, 2002, and 2011
James S. House
2014-09-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4690NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Americans' Changing Lives (ACL) survey series is an ongoing nationally representative longitudinal study focusing especially on differences between Black and White Americans in middle and late life. These data constitute the first,
second, third, fourth, and fifth waves in a panel survey covering a wide range of sociological, psychological, mental, and physical health items.
Wave I of the study began in 1986 with a nation face-to-face survey of 3,617 adults ages 25 and up, with Black Americans and people aged 60 and over over-sampled at twice the rate of the others. Wave II constitutes face-to-face re-interviews in 1989 of those still alive. Survivors have been re-interviewed by telephone, and when necessary face-to-face, in 1994, 2001/02, and 2011, making up Waves III, IV, and V of the data.
ACL was designed and sought out to investigate the following: (1) the ways in which a wide range of activities and social relationships that people engage in are broadly "productive," (2) how individuals adapt to acute life events and chronic stresses that threaten the maintenance of health, effective functioning, and productive activity, and (3) sociocultural variations in the nature, meaning, determinants, and consequences of productive activity and relationships. Among the topics covered are
interpersonal relationships (spouse/partner, children, parents,
friends), sources and levels of satisfaction, social interactions and
leisure activities, traumatic life events (physical assault, serious
illness, divorce, death of a loved one, financial or legal problems),
perceptions of retirement, health behaviors (smoking, alcohol
consumption, overweight, rest), and utilization of health care
services (doctor visits, hospitalization, nursing home
institutionalization, bed days). Also included are measures of
physical health, psychological well-being, and indices referring to
cognitive functioning. Demographic information provided for individuals
includes household composition, number of children and grandchildren,
employment status, occupation and work history, income, family
financial situation, religious beliefs and practices, ethnicity, race,
education, sex, and region of residence.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04690.v7
age groupsicpsrchild careicpsrcognitive functioningicpsrcopingicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdiscriminationicpsremploymenticpsrenvironmenticpsrexperienceicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrhealthicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrhospicesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseworkicpsrlife eventsicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmarital statusicpsrmemoryicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrparenting skillsicpsrpersonalityicpsrphysical fitnessicpsrpsychological wellbeingicpsrquality of lifeicpsrraceicpsrrecessionicpsrreligionicpsrretirement planningicpsrsocial adjustmenticpsrsocial networksicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrstressicpsrvolunteersicpsrNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityDSDR IX. NIA Supported StudiesICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United StatesDSDR III. Health and MortalityHouse, James S.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4690Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04690.v7 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34876MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34876MiAaIMiAaI
Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A), 2011
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2014-09-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34876NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A) is a national census data system of annual admissions to substance abuse treatment facilities. TEDS-A provides annual data on the number and characteristics of persons admitted to public and private substance abuse treatment programs that receive public funding. The unit of analysis is a treatment admission. TEDS consists of data reported to state substance abuse agencies by the treatment programs, which in turn report it to SAMHSA.
A sister data system, called the Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D), collects data on discharges from substance abuse treatment facilities. The first year of TEDS-A data is 1992, while the first year of TEDS-D is 2006.
TEDS variables that are required to be reported are called the "Minimum Data Set (MDS)", while those that are optional are called the "Supplemental Data Set (SuDS)".
Variables in the MDS include: information on service setting, number of prior treatments, primary source of referral, gender, race, ethnicity, education, employment status, substance(s) abused, route of administration, frequency of use, age at first use, and whether methadone was prescribed in treatment. Supplemental variables include: diagnosis codes, presence of psychiatric problems, living arrangements, source of income, health insurance, expected source of payment, pregnancy and veteran status, marital status, detailed not in labor force codes, detailed criminal justice referral codes, days waiting to enter treatment, and the number of arrests in the 30 days prior to admissions (starting in 2008).
Substances abused include alcohol, cocaine and crack, marijuana and hashish, heroin, nonprescription methadone, other opiates and synthetics, PCP, other hallucinogens, methamphetamine, other amphetamines, other stimulants, benzodiazepines, other non-benzodiazepine tranquilizers, barbiturates, other non-barbiturate sedatives or hypnotics, inhalants, over-the-counter medications, and other substances.
Created variables include total number of substances reported, intravenous drug use (IDU), and flags for any mention of specific substances.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34876.v3
alcohol abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrinterventionicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsrSAMHDA III. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS)ICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34876Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34876.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34947MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34947MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health
[electronic resource]10-Year Substate R-DAS (2002 to 2011)
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2014-02-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34947NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This file includes data from the 2002 through 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) survey. The only variables included in the data file are ones that were collected in a comparable manner across all ten years of data.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Certain questions are asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Also included are questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Demographic information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
In the income section, which was interviewer-administered, a split-sample study had been embedded within the 2006 and 2007 surveys to compare a shorter version of the income questions with a longer set of questions that had been used in previous surveys. This shorter version was adopted for the 2008 NSDUH and will be used for future NSDUHs.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34947.v1
addictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34947Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34947.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34482MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34482MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health
[electronic resource]2-Year R-DAS (2002 to 2003, 2004 to 2005, 2006 to 2007, 2008 to 2009, and 2010 to 2011)
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2014-06-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR34482NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This file includes data from the 2002 through 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) survey. The only variables included in the data file are ones that were collected in a comparable manner across one or more of the pair years, i.e., 2002-2003, 2004-2005, 2006-2007, 2008-2009, or 2010-2011.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Certain questions are asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Also included are questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Demographic information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
In the income section, which was interviewer-administered, a split-sample study had been embedded within the 2006 and 2007 surveys to compare a shorter version of the income questions with a longer set of questions that had been used in previous surveys. This shorter version was adopted for the 2008 NSDUH and will be used for future NSDUHs.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34482.v2
marijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsraddictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34482Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34482.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34481MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34481MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2011
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2014-05-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR34481NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2011 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For the 2008 survey, adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. In 2008, a split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions (WHODAS vs. SDS) to assess impairment due to mental health problems. Beginning with the 2009 NSDUH, however, all of the adults in the sample received only the WHODAS questions. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34481.v3
alcohol abuseicpsraddictionicpsralcoholicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsryouthsicpsrSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)RCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityDSDR III. Health and MortalityUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34481Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34481.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34608MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34608MiAaIMiAaI
East Asian Social Survey (EASS), Cross-National Survey Data Sets
[electronic resource]Health and Society in East Asia, 2010
Noriko Iwai (JGSS)
,
Lulu Li (CGSS)
,
Sang-Wook Kim (KGSS)
,
Ying-Hwa Chang (TSCS)
2014-05-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34608NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The East Asian Social Survey (EASS) is a biennial social survey project that serves as a cross-national network of the following four General Social Survey type surveys in East Asia: Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS), Japanese General Social Survey (JGSS), Korean General Social Survey (KGSS), Taiwan Social Change Survey (TSCS), and comparatively examines diverse aspects of social life in these regions. Survey information in this module focused on issues that affected overall health, such as specific conditions, physical functioning, aid received from family members or friends when needed, and lifestyle choices. Topics included activities respondents were able to perform and how they were affected socially in light of specific physical and mental health conditions. Respondents were asked to provide health conditions they were suffering from, such as hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and how these conditions were limiting with respect to general health, physical functioning, emotional and mental health, as well as social functioning. Other topics included participation and frequency of lifestyle habits that affected overall health, as well as how often respondents visited the doctor. Respondents were also queried on whether they sought out alternative, non-traditional homeopathic care and whether family, friends, or co-workers listened to their personal problems and provided support financially. Additional topics include the environment and pollution, neighborhood amenities, fear of aging, addiction, and body image. Demographic information specific to the respondent and their spouse includes age, sex, marital status, education, employment status and hours worked, occupation, earnings and income, religion, class, size of community, and region.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34608.v2
health problemsicpsrInterneticpsrmental disordersicpsrmental healthicpsrphysical limitationsicpsrpollutionicpsrpublic opinionicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsmokingicpsrsocial behavioricpsrvaccinesicpsraddictionicpsragingicpsralcohol consumptionicpsrbody heighticpsrbody imageicpsrbody mass indexicpsrbody weighticpsrcaregiversicpsrchronic illnessesicpsrdoctor visitsicpsremotional disordersicpsrenvironmenticpsrfamily relationsicpsrgamblingicpsrhealthicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth careicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR XVII.F. Social Institutions and Behavior, Leisure and RecreationICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesIwai (JGSS), NorikoLi (CGSS), LuluKim (KGSS), Sang-WookChang (TSCS), Ying-HwaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34608Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34608.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34623MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34623MiAaIMiAaI
Japanese General Social Survey (JGSS), 2010
[electronic resource]
Ichiro Tanioka
,
Yukio Maeda
,
Noriko Iwai
2014-02-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34623NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Japanese General Social Surveys (JGSS) Project is a Japanese version of the General Social Survey (GSS) project closely replicating the original GSS of the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. It provides data for analyses of Japanese society, attitudes, and behaviors, which makes possible international comparisons. Respondents were asked about employment, family and household composition, education, entertainment, technology and Internet usage, status and opinions on mental and physical health, alcohol and tobacco use, life satisfaction, addiction, proficiency with English, voting behavior, opinions on political and social issues, taxes and government expenditure, views on burial, family beliefs and issues, trust in people and institutions, membership in organizations, volunteering, perception of their personal appearance, receiving help from others, and their neighborhood environment. Demographic questions included age, sex, marital status, household income, and religious orientation and behavior.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34623.v2
addictionicpsralcohol consumptionicpsrcareer changeicpsrcareer historyicpsrchildrenicpsrchronic illnessesicpsrcommunitiesicpsrcommuting (travel)icpsrdomestic responsibilitiesicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrEnglish as a Second Languageicpsrentertainmenticpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrhealth statusicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrInterneticpsrjob satisfactionicpsrleisureicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmental healthicpsrphysical appearanceicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrsocial issuesicpsrtrust (psychology)icpsrsocial statusicpsrtaxesicpsrtechnologyicpsrtobacco useicpsrtravelicpsrenvironmental attitudesicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfamily sizeicpsrgender rolesicpsrgovernment expendituresicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrunemploymenticpsrwork environmenticpsrIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesTanioka, IchiroMaeda, YukioIwai, NorikoInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34623Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34623.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29761MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29761MiAaIMiAaI
Eurobarometer 73.2
[electronic resource]Humanitarian Aid, Domestic Violence Against Women, and Mental Well-Being, February-March 2010
European Commission
2013-08-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR29761NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Eurobarometer series is a unique cross-national and cross-temporal survey program conducted on behalf of the European Commission. These surveys regularly monitor public opinion in the European Union (EU) member countries and consist of standard modules and special topic modules. The standard modules address attitudes towards European unification, institutions and policies, measurements for general socio-political orientations, as well as respondent and household demographics. The special topic modules address such topics as agriculture, education, natural environment and resources, public health, public safety and crime, and science and technology.
This round of Eurobarometer surveys covers the following special topics: (1) humanitarian aid, (2) domestic violence against women, and (3) mental well-being. Information was collected on respondents' knowledge of humanitarian aid activities and the importance of funding these activities, awareness and perception of domestic violence against women, and ways to aid domestic violence victims. Finally, respondents were asked about their own mental well-being and the effects of mental health on their everyday lives.
Demographic and other background information collected includes age, gender, nationality, marital status, occupation, age when stopped full-time education, household composition, ownership of a fixed or mobile telephone and other goods, difficulties in paying bills, level in society, Internet use, type and size of locality, region of residence, and language of interview (in select countries).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29761.v2
abuseicpsrattitudesicpsrdomestic violenceicpsreconomic integrationicpsremotional disordersicpsremotional statesicpsrEuropean unificationicpsrEuropean Unionicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhumanitarian aidicpsrmental healthicpsrpublic opinionicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial changeicpsrsocial issuesicpsrviolence against womenicpsrICPSR XIV.C.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Attitudes Toward Regional Integration, EuropeIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataEuropean CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29761Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29761.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31321MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31321MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of the Psychological Effects of Administrative Segregation in Colorado, 2007-2010
[electronic resource]
Maureen L. O'Keefe
,
Kelli J. Klebe
2014-02-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR31321NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The study was conducted to evaluate the psychological effects of long-term administrative segregation (AS) on offenders, particularly those with mental illness. The longitudinal study examined five groups of inmates in the Colorado prison system over the course of one year: inmates in AS at the Colorado State Penitentiary (CSP) with mental illness, inmates in AS at the CSP without mental illness, inmates at risk of AS in the general population (GP) with mental illness, inmates at risk of AS in the GP without mental illness, and inmates at the San Carlos Correctional Facility, a facility for offenders with severe mental illness. Over the course of the study, researchers assessed each group of inmates using 14 psychological instruments, most of which were administered at three month intervals. Of the 14 psychological instruments, 12 were self-reports by inmates, 1 was filled out by mental health clinicians, and 1 was filled out by correctional staff.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31321.v1
correctional facilities (adults)icpsrinmate classificationicpsrmale offendersicpsrmental healthicpsrprison conditionsicpsrprison inmatesicpsrpsychological effectsicpsrpsychological wellbeingicpsrsolitary confinementicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemO'Keefe, Maureen L.Klebe, Kelli J.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31321Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31321.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34263MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34263MiAaIMiAaI
Oregon Youth Substance Use Project (OYSUP), 1998-2010
[electronic resource]
Judy Andrews
2014-03-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34263NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Oregon Youth Substance Use Project (OYSUP) began in 1998, with the recruitment of 1,075 first through fifth graders within a single school district in a working class community in western Oregon. OYSUP is an extensive etiological study that provides a multi-method annual assessment of etiological factors from a variety of contextual (including family, peer, neighborhood and school) and individual (personality, biological influences) domains, predictive of children's cognitions regarding substance use, their own substance use and their at-risk sexual behaviors (beginning in middle school). This unique study follows a representative sample of youth with approximately annual assessments from early childhood, through adolescence, and into emerging adulthood (at age 20-22). The primary objective of the original project and its renewals is to identify risk and protective factors predictive of or comorbid with the development of substance use and at-risk sexual behaviors.
Quantitative survey data was collected from each respondent from 1998 to 2010. Within the aims of the original OYSUP study and the two subsequent renewals (one of which is ongoing), participants and their parents were followed annually until they were one-year post-high school, with an additional intensive assessment at age 20-22. In each year, the target participant and their parents completed assessments. The intensive assessment at age 20-22 included a diagnostic interview with the target participants and an assessment of cortisol reactivity in response to acute stress. During the school years, teachers completed assessments assessing their student's behavior, and school records for most students were obtained each year. In addition, principals in elementary schools completed school climate assessments and census data is used to obtain measures of neighborhood climate. Finally, respondents' demographic information was also collected.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34263.v2
alcohol consumptionicpsrbiomeasuresicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug useicpsreducatorsicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrmental healthicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrparentsicpsrrisk factorsicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsocial environmenticpsrstudent attitudesicpsrstudent behavioricpsrstudent evaluationicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtobacco useicpsryouthsicpsrICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and YouthNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramAndrews, JudyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34263Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34263.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34860MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34860MiAaIMiAaI
Moving to Opportunity
[electronic resource]Final Impacts Evaluation Science Article Data, 2008-2010
Jens Ludwig
,
Greg Duncan
,
Lisa Gennetian
,
Lawrence Katz
,
Ronald Kessler
,
Jeffrey Kling
,
Lisa Sanbonmatsu
2013-10-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34860NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Moving to Opportunity (MTO) program was a randomized housing experiment administered by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that gave low-income families living in high-poverty areas the chance to move to lower-poverty areas. This Restricted Access Dataset (RAD) includes data from the 3,273 adults interviewed as part of the MTO long-term evaluation and is comprised of variables analyzed for the article "Neighborhood Effects on the Long-Term Well-Being of Low-Income Adults" that was published in the journal
Science
on September 21, 2012. The article focused on subjective well-being, physical and mental health, social networks, neighborhoods, housing, and economic self-sufficiency. Families were tracked from the baseline survey (1994-1998) through the long-term evaluation survey fielding period (2008-2010) with the purpose of determining the effects of "neighborhood" on participating families from five United States cities. Households were randomly assigned to one of three groups:
The low-poverty voucher (LPV) group (also called the experimental group) received Section 8 rental assistance certificates or vouchers that they could use only in census tracts with 1990 poverty rates below 10 percent. The families received mobility counseling and help in leasing a new unit. One year after relocating, families could use their voucher to move again if they wished, without any special constraints on location.
The traditional voucher (TRV) group (also called the Section 8 group) received regular Section 8 certificates or vouchers that they could use anywhere; these families received no special mobility counseling.
The control group received no certificates or vouchers through MTO, but continued to be eligible for project-based housing assistance and other social programs and services to which they would otherwise be entitled.
The dataset contains all outcomes and mediators analyzed for the
Science
article, as well as a variety of demographic and other baseline measures that were controlled for in the analysis. Demographic information includes age, gender, race/ethnicity, employment status, and education level.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34860.v2
neighborhood conditionsicpsrneighborhoodsicpsrpovertyicpsrpublic safetyicpsrrelocationicpsrsocial integrationicpsrsocial isolationicpsrwelfare servicesicpsrcrimeicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrfear of crimeicpsrfinancial supporticpsrhappinessicpsrhealthicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhousing programsicpsrhousing unitsicpsrjob trainingicpsrlow income groupsicpsrlower classicpsrmental healthicpsrICPSR II. Community and Urban StudiesLudwig, JensDuncan, GregGennetian, LisaKatz, LawrenceKessler, RonaldKling, JeffreySanbonmatsu, LisaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34860Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34860.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34898MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34898MiAaIMiAaI
Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D), 2010
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2013-11-21Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34898NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D) is a national census data system of annual discharges from substance abuse treatment facilities. TEDS-D provides annual data on the number and characteristics of persons discharged from public and private substance abuse treatment programs that receive public funding. Data collected both at admission and at discharge is included. The unit of analysis is a treatment discharge. TEDS-D consists of data reported to state substance abuse agencies by the treatment programs, which in turn report it to SAMHSA.
A sister data system, called the Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A), collects data on admissions to substance abuse treatment facilities. The first year of TEDS-A data is 1992, while the first year of TEDS-D is 2006.
TEDS-D variables that are required to be reported are called the "Minimum Data Set (MDS)", while those that are optional are called the "Supplemental Data Set (SuDS)".
Variables unique to TEDS-D, and not part of TEDS-A, are the length of stay, reason for leaving treatment, and service setting at time of discharge. TEDS-D also provides many of the same variables that exist in TEDS-A. This includes information on service setting, number of prior treatments, primary source of referral, gender, race, ethnicity, education, employment status, substance(s) abused, route of administration, frequency of use, age at first use, and whether methadone was prescribed in treatment. Supplemental variables include: diagnosis codes, presence of psychiatric problems, living arrangements, source of income, health insurance, expected source of payment, pregnancy and veteran status, marital status, detailed not in labor force codes, detailed criminal justice referral codes, days waiting to enter treatment, and the number of arrests in the 30 days prior to admissions (starting in 2008).
Substances abused include alcohol, cocaine and crack, marijuana and
hashish, heroin, nonprescription methadone, other opiates and
synthetics, PCP, other hallucinogens, methamphetamine, other amphetamines,
other stimulants, benzodiazepines, other non-benzodiazepine tranquilizers, barbiturates, other non-barbiturate sedatives or hypnotics, inhalants, over-the-counter medications, and other substances.
Created variables include total number of substances reported, intravenous drug use (IDU), and flags for any mention of specific substances.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34898.v1
alcohol abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrinterventionicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsrICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesSAMHDA III. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS)RCMD V. Health and Well-BeingDSDR III. Health and MortalityUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34898Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34898.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34976MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34976MiAaIMiAaI
Public Use Data (2008-10) on Long-Term Neighborhood Effects on Low-Income Families (Adult Data Only) from All Five Sites of the Moving to Opportunity Experiment
[electronic resource]
Jens Ludwig
,
Greg Duncan
,
Lisa Gennetian
,
Lawrence Katz
,
Ronald Kessler
,
Jeffrey Kling
,
Lisa Sanbonmatsu
2014-01-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34976NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Nearly 9 million Americans live in extreme-poverty neighborhoods, places that also tend to be racially segregated and dangerous. Yet, the effects on the well-being of residents of moving out of such communities into less distressed areas remain uncertain. Moving to Opportunity (MTO) is a randomized housing experiment administered by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development that gave low-income families living in high-poverty areas in five cities the chance to move to lower-poverty areas. Families were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) The experimental group (also called the low-poverty voucher (LPV) group) received Section 8 rental assistance certificates or vouchers that they could use only in census tracts with 1990 poverty rates below 10 percent. The families received mobility counseling and help in leasing a new unit. One year after relocating, families could use their voucher to move again if they wished, without any special constraints on location. (2) The Section 8 group (also called the traditional voucher (TRV) group) received regular Section 8 certificates or vouchers that they could use anywhere; these families received no special mobility counseling. (3) The control group received no certificates or vouchers through MTO, but continued to be eligible for project-based housing assistance and whatever other social programs and services to which they would otherwise be entitled. Families were tracked from baseline (1994-98) through the long-term evaluation survey fielding period (2008-10) with the purpose of determining the effects of "neighborhood" on participating families. This data collection contains data from the 3,273 adult interviews completed as part of the MTO long-term evaluation and are comprised of adult variables that have been analyzed. Using data from the long-term evaluation, the associated article reports that moving from a high-poverty to lower-poverty neighborhood leads to long-term (10- to 15-year) improvements in adult physical and mental health and subjective well-being, despite not affecting economic self-sufficiency. The data contain all adult outcomes and mediators analyzed for the associated article as well as a variety of demographic and other baseline measures that were controlled for in the analysis.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34976.v1
living conditionsicpsrmental healthicpsrneighborhood characteristicsicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrneighborhoodsicpsrphysical conditionicpsrpovertyicpsrpoverty programsicpsrpublic housingicpsrquality of lifeicpsrICPSR XVIII. Replication DatasetsLudwig, JensDuncan, GregGennetian, LisaKatz, LawrenceKessler, RonaldKling, JeffreySanbonmatsu, LisaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34976Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34976.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35013MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35013MiAaIMiAaI
New York City Community Health Survey, 2010
[electronic resource]
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
2014-04-17Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35013NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Community Health Survey (CHS) has been conducted annually by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene since 2002. The CHS aims to collect data to form a better understanding of the health and risk behaviors of New Yorkers and to track key indicators over time. All data collected are self-reported. The CHS queried respondents on the following topics: general health status, mental health, health care access, body weight, cardiovascular health, diabetes, asthma, immunizations, nutrition, physical activity, alcohol consumption, soda consumption and cancer screening. The survey gathered information about sexual identity, sexual behavior, contraception usage, sexual history, HIV, smoking habits, smoking cessation, where cigarettes and cessation aids were purchased, and second hand smoke. Additional information was collected on whether respondents were taking any medication to control their medical and mental health issues. Demographic variables include gender, age, marital status, employment status, race, poverty level, income, and education level.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35013.v1
alcohol consumptionicpsrcommunity healthicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrexerciseicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrHIVicpsrhomosexualityicpsrhypertensionicpsrillnessicpsrinfluenzaicpsrmammographyicpsrmental healthicpsrnutritionicpsrpublic healthicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsmokingicpsrsmoking cessationicpsrdiabetesicpsrdiseaseicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD XII. Public OpinionRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR II. Community and Urban StudiesRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesNew York City Department of Health and Mental HygieneInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35013Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35013.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34945MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34945MiAaIMiAaI
National Mental Health Services Survey (N-MHSS), 2010
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2014-07-17Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34945NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Mental Health Services Survey (N-MHSS) is designed to collect information from all specialty mental health facilities in the United States, both public and private. N-MHSS provides the mechanism for quantifying the dynamic character and composition of the United States mental health treatment delivery system.
The objective of the N-MHSS is to collect data
that can be used for multiple purposes:
To assist SAMHSA and state and local governments in assessing the nature and extent of services provided in state-funded, state-operated, and other mental health treatment facilities, and in forecasting mental health treatment resource requirements.
To update SAMHSA's Inventory of Behavioral Health Services (I-BHS), an inventory of all known mental health and substance abuse treatment facilities in the United States, which can be used as a frame for future surveys of these facilities.
To describe the nature and scope of mental health treatment services and conduct comparative analyses for the nation and states.
To update the information in the mental health component of SAMHSA's online Behavioral Health Treatment Services Locator, a searchable database of licensed and accredited public and private facilities for the provision of mental health treatment.
Data are collected on topics including:
Facility type, operation, and primary treatment focus.
Facility treatment characteristics (e.g., settings of care; mental health treatment approaches, supportive services/practices, and special programs offered; crisis intervention team availability; and seclusion and restraint practices).
Facility operating characteristics (e.g., age groups accepted; services provided in non-English languages; and smoking policy).
Facility management characteristics (e.g., computerized functionality; licensure, certification, and accreditation; standard operating procedures; and sources of payment and funding).
Client demographic characteristics.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34945.v2
mental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrtreatment facilitiesicpsrtreatment programsicpsrSAMHDA XXIV. National Mental Health Services Survey (N-MHSS)ICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34945Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34945.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33001MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33001MiAaIMiAaI
Generational Memory and the Critical Period
[electronic resource]Evidence for National and World Events, 1985-2010
Howard Schuman
,
Amy Corning
2012-01-23Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR33001NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Investigators of this study bring together survey data from sources both new and old in order to test the generational hypothesis that national and world events experienced during a "critical period" of later childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood have a disproportionate effect on memories, attitudes, and actions in later life. Also considered were competing explanations for the same evidence, especially interpretations based on period and recency effects. The data come from nine surveys, mostly national, carried out in the United States and in six other countries (China, Germany, Israel, Japan, Lithuania, and Russia), between 1985 and 2010. The hypothesis is largely supported for recall of past events, and also for commemorative behavior connected to World War II and to the Vietnam War. The evidence is mixed with regard to attitudes toward the Gulf War and the Iraq invasion, emphasizing the distinction between generational effects that result from lifetime experience and those due to a critical period. The analysis considered most of the major events faced by Americans over the past 80 years, ranging from the Great Depression to current issues, including such national traumas as the assassination of President Kennedy, the Vietnam War, and the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack. Comparable events in other countries were also examined.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33001.v1
adultsicpsrattitudesicpsrchild developmenticpsrchildhoodicpsrcopingicpsremotional developmenticpsrexperienceicpsrlife eventsicpsrmental healthicpsrpsychological effectsicpsrSeptember 11 attackicpsrterrorismicpsrVietnam Waricpsrwaricpsrworld problemsicpsrWorld War IIicpsrworld warsicpsrICPSR XVIII. Replication DatasetsSchuman, HowardCorning, AmyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33001Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33001.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31381MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31381MiAaIMiAaI
WHO Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health (SAGE)
[electronic resource]Wave 1, 2007-2010
Somnath Chatterji
,
Paul Kowal
2013-12-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR31381NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The World Health Organization (WHO)'s Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health (SAGE) is a longitudinal follow-up of a cohort of ageing and older adults. SAGE has been built on the experience and standardized instruments of WHO's 2000/2001 Multi-country Survey Study (MCSS) and the 2002/2004 World Health Surveys (WHS). These surveys focused on health and health-related outcomes and their determinants and impacts in nationally representative samples. These data will address data gaps on ageing, adult health and well-being in lower and middle income countries, whilst being comparable to surveys conducted in higher income countries (such as the United States' Health and Retirement Study (HRS), English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), and the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE)). One of the major drivers of this effort has been the lack of comparability of self-reported health status in international health surveys due to systematic biases in reporting, despite using similar instruments and attempts at making questions conceptually equivalent in translation. SAGE uses standard instruments developed over the last decade, a common design and training approach with explicit strategies for making data comparable to cover a wide range of issues that directly and indirectly impact health and well-being. The survey methodology and research design has included a number of methods to address methods for detecting and correcting for systematic reporting biases in health interview surveys, including vignette methodologies, objective performance tests and biomarkers. A number of techniques have also been employed to improve data comparability, including using common definitions of concepts, common methods of data collection and translations, rigorous sample design and post hoc harmonization. The 2007-2010 SAGE Wave 1 data from six countries (China, Ghana, India, Mexico, Russia, and South Africa) is the follow-up survey project to the 2002-2004 WHO data, which constitutes Wave 0 of WHO's Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health (SAGE). A sample of these respondents from SAGE Wave 0 are included in this follow-up 2007-2010 SAGE Wave 1 in the six countries, with new respondents added to ensure a nationally representative sample.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31381.v1
agingicpsralcoholicpsrbiomarkersicpsrcognitive functioningicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdieticpsrdiseaseicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth statusicpsrillnessicpsrleisureicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmedical historyicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrphysical conditionicpsrsocial environmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsNACDA IV. Psychological Characteristics, Mental Health, and Well-Being of Older AdultsNACDA VI. Health Care Needs, Utilization, and Financing for Older AdultsICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesNACDA III. Economic Characteristics of Older AdultsICPSR II. Community and Urban StudiesChatterji, SomnathKowal, PaulInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31381Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31381.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31521MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31521MiAaIMiAaI
General Social Survey, 1972-2010 [Cumulative File]
[electronic resource]
Tom W. Smith
,
Peter V. Marsden
,
Michael Hout
2013-02-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR31521NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The General Social Surveys (GSS) were designed as part of a data diffusion project in 1972. The GSS replicated questionnaire items and wording in order to facilitate time-trend studies. The latest survey, GSS 2010, includes a cumulative file that merges all 28 General Social Surveys into a single file containing data from 1972 to 2010. The items appearing in the surveys are one of three types: Permanent questions that occur on each survey, rotating questions that appear on two out of every three surveys (1973, 1974, and 1976, or 1973, 1975, and 1976), and a few occasional questions such as split ballot experiments that occur in a single survey. The 2010 surveys included four topic modules: quality of working life, science, shared capitalism, and CDC high risk behaviors. The International Social Survey Program (ISSP) module included in the 2010 survey was environment. The data also contain several variables describing the demographic characteristics of the respondents.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31521.v1
divorceicpsrdissenticpsrdrug useicpsreconomic issuesicpsrabortionicpsrAffirmative ActionicpsremploymenticpsragricultureicpsrAIDSicpsrenvironmenticpsrenvironmental attitudesicpsrenvironmental protectionicpsrethnicityicpsreuthanasiaicpsralcoholicpsraltruismicpsrcitizenshipicpsrprejudiceicpsrprivacyicpsrrace relationsicpsrexpendituresicpsrfamiliesicpsrforeign affairsicpsrfreedomicpsrgendericpsrgender issuesicpsrracial attitudesicpsrreligionicpsrschool prayericpsrscienceicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsexual preferenceicpsrsmokingicpsrsocial classesicpsrsocial inequalityicpsrsocial mobilityicpsrsocial networksicpsrSocial Securityicpsrsportsicpsrsuicideicpsrtaxesicpsrtechnologyicpsrtelevisionicpsrterminal illnessesicpsrterrorismicpsrunemploymenticpsrwelfare servicesicpsrworkicpsrcivil rightsicpsrcommunismicpsrbirth controlicpsrbusinessicpsrcapital punishmenticpsrchildrenicpsrcommunity participationicpsrcompensationicpsrcomputer useicpsrcorporationsicpsrcourtsicpsrcrimeicpsrdemocracyicpsrgender rolesicpsrgovernmenticpsrhealthicpsrhousingicpsrhuman rightsicpsrhuntingicpsrimmigrationicpsrincomeicpsrindustryicpsrJewsicpsrlabor unionsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmarriageicpsrmedia coverageicpsrmental healthicpsrmilitary drafticpsrmilitary serviceicpsrnational identityicpsroccupationsicpsrparentsicpsrphysiciansicpsrpoliceicpsrpoliticsicpsrpatientsicpsrpovertyicpsrICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United StatesAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsSmith, Tom W.Marsden, Peter V.Hout, MichaelInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31521Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31521.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33261MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33261MiAaIMiAaI
Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A), 2010
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality.
2014-09-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR33261NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A) is a national census data system of annual admissions to substance abuse treatment facilities. TEDS-A provides annual data on the number and characteristics of persons admitted to public and private substance abuse treatment programs that receive public funding. The unit of analysis is a treatment admission. TEDS consists of data reported to state substance abuse agencies by the treatment programs, which in turn report it to SAMHSA.
A sister data system, called the Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D), collects data on discharges from substance abuse treatment facilities. The first year of TEDS-A data is 1992, while the first year of TEDS-D is 2006.
TEDS variables that are required to be reported are called the "Minimum Data Set (MDS)", while those that are optional are called the "Supplemental Data Set (SuDS)".
Variables in the MDS include: information on service setting, number of prior treatments, primary source of referral, gender, race, ethnicity, education, employment status, substance(s) abused, route of administration, frequency of use, age at first use, and whether methadone was prescribed in treatment. Supplemental variables include: diagnosis codes, presence of psychiatric problems, living arrangements, source of income, health insurance, expected source of payment, pregnancy and veteran status, marital status, detailed not in labor force codes, detailed criminal justice referral codes, days waiting to enter treatment, and the number of arrests in the 30 days prior to admissions (starting in 2008) .
Substances abused include alcohol, cocaine and crack, marijuana and hashish, heroin, nonprescription methadone, other opiates and synthetics, PCP, other hallucinogens, methamphetamine, other amphetamines, other stimulants, benzodiazepines, other non-benzodiazepine tranquilizers, barbiturates, other non-barbiturate sedatives or hypnotics, inhalants, over-the-counter medications, and other substances.
Created variables include total number of substances reported, intravenous drug use (IDU), and flags for any mention of specific substances.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33261.v4
substance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsralcohol abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrinterventionicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingSAMHDA III. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS)ICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33261Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33261.v4 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32722MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32722MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2014-09-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR32722NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2010 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For the 2008 survey, adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. In 2008, a split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions (WHODAS vs. SDS) to assess impairment due to mental health problems. Beginning with the 2009 NSDUH, however, all of the adults in the sample received only the WHODAS questions. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32722.v5
drug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsraddictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeRCMD I. CrimeDSDR III. Health and MortalityRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32722Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32722.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33621MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33621MiAaIMiAaI
Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D), 2009
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality.
2013-11-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR33621NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D) is a national census data system of annual discharges from substance abuse treatment facilities. TEDS-D provides annual data on the number and characteristics of persons discharged from public and private substance abuse treatment programs that receive public funding. Data collected both at admission and at discharge is included. The unit of analysis is a treatment discharge. TEDS-D consists of data reported to state substance abuse agencies by the treatment programs, which in turn report it to SAMHSA.
A sister data system, called the Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A), collects data on admissions to substance abuse treatment facilities. The first year of TEDS-A data is 1992, while the first year of TEDS-D is 2006.
TEDS-D variables that are required to be reported are called the "Minimum Data Set (MDS)", while those that are optional are called the "Supplemental Data Set (SuDS)".
Variables unique to TEDS-D, and not part of TEDS-A, are the length of stay, reason for leaving treatment, and service setting at time of discharge. TEDS-D also provides many of the same variables that exist in TEDS-A. This includes information on service setting, number of prior treatments, primary source of referral, gender, race, ethnicity, education, employment status, substance(s) abused, route of administration, frequency of use, age at first use, and whether methadone was prescribed in treatment. Supplemental variables include: diagnosis codes, presence of psychiatric problems, living arrangements, source of income, health insurance, expected source of payment, pregnancy and veteran status, marital status, detailed not in labor force codes, detailed criminal justice referral codes, days waiting to enter treatment, and the number of arrests in the 30 days prior to admissions (starting in 2008) .
Substances abused include alcohol, cocaine and crack, marijuana and hashish, heroin, nonprescription methadone, other opiates and synthetics, PCP, other hallucinogens, methamphetamine, other amphetamines, other stimulants, benzodiazepines, other non-benzodiazepine tranquilizers, barbiturates, other non-barbiturate sedatives or hypnotics, inhalants, over-the-counter medications, and other substances.
Created variables include total number of substances reported, intravenous drug use (IDU), and flags for any mention of specific substances.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33621.v1
alcohol abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrinterventionicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsrSAMHDA III. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS)RCMD V. Health and Well-BeingDSDR III. Health and MortalityNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33621Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33621.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33782MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33782MiAaIMiAaI
Enhanced Services for the Hard-to-Employ Demonstration and Evaluation Project
[electronic resource]Rhode Island, Working Toward Wellness
Sue Kim
2013-01-21Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR33782NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Enhanced Services for the Hard-to-Employ (HtE) Demonstration and Evaluation Project was a 10-year study (taken on by the MDRC) that evaluated strategies aimed at improving employment and other outcomes for groups who face serious barriers to employment. The Enhanced Services for the Hard-to-Employ was the first comprehensive attempt to understand the diverse low-income population and to test interventions aimed at the most common barriers to this population's employment. The HtE demonstration was designed to assess ways to boost employment, reduce welfare receipt, and promote well-being in low-income populations. This study analyzed the effectiveness of the Rhode Island "Working toward Wellness" (WTW) program, a one-year program that provided telephonic care management to depressed parents receiving Medicaid in Rhode Island. The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self Report (QIDS-SR) questionnaire was administered to parents in order to identify those with major depression. All consenting parents who were found to have major depression were then assigned to the study. The Working Toward Wellness full research sample consisted of 499 individuals randomly assigned between November 2004 and October 2006 (245 members in the program group and 254 in the control group). The research team followed the two groups for three years using surveys. All 400 sample members completed a baseline survey at random assignment, providing basic demographic information, data on depression, other health outcomes, employment, participation in outreach programs, receipt of behavioral health services, and material hardship prior to enrollment in the study. Three follow up surveys were collected at the sixth month, eighteenth month, and thirty-sixth month marks. The WTW 6, 18, and 36 month reports include data from surveys administered to parents and children; however, only measures used in the adult/parent analysis are included due to restrictions. Care managers recorded information on attempted and completed calls with 230 members in the program group. Data was collected on respondent's general health, depression scores and treatments, substance abuse, work performance and attendance, as well as wages and income. Demographic information includes age, race, marital status, education, employment status, individual and household monthly income, as well as social security and disability status.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33782.v1
caregiversicpsrchildrenicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsremploymenticpsrhealthicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth care servicesicpsrlow income groupsicpsrMedicaidicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrparentsicpsrwelfare reformicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingRCMD IV. EmploymentICPSR XV.A. Organizational Behavior, United StatesICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesKim, SueInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33782Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33782.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR28721MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR28721MiAaIMiAaI
National Health Interview Survey, 2009
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics
2010-08-26Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR28721NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) is to obtain information about the amount and distribution of illness, its effects in terms of disability and chronic impairments, and the kinds of health services people receive. Implementation of a redesigned NHIS, consisting of a basic module, a periodic module, and a topical module, began in 1997 (see NATIONAL HEALTH INTERVIEW SURVEY, 1997 [ICPSR 2954]). The 2009 NHIS contains the Household, Family, Person, Sample Adult, and Sample Child files from the basic module. Each record in Part 1, Household Level, contains data on type of living quarters, number of families in the household responding and not responding, and the month and year of the interview for each sampling unit. Part 2, Family Level, is made up of reconstructed variables from the person-level data of the basic module and includes information on sex, age, race, marital status, Hispanic origin, education, veteran status, family income, family size, major activities, health status, activity limits, and employment status, along with industry and occupation. As part of the basic module, Part 3, Person Level, provides information on all family members with respect to health status, limitation of daily activities, cognitive impairment, and health conditions. Also included are variables related to doctor visits, hospital stays, and health care access and utilization. A randomly-selected adult in each family was interviewed for Part 4, Sample Adult Level, regarding respiratory conditions, renal conditions, AIDS, joint symptoms, health status, limitation of daily activities, and behaviors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity. Part 5, Sample Child Level, provides information from an adult in the household on medical conditions of one child in the household, such as respiratory problems, seizures, allergies, and use of special equipment like hearing aids, braces, or wheelchairs. Part 6, Injury/Poison Episode, is an episode-based file that contains information about the external cause and nature of the injury or poisoning episode and what the person was doing at the time of the injury or poisoning episode, in addition to the date and place of occurrence. Part 7, Injury/Poison Episode Verbatim, contains edited narrative text descriptions of the injury or poisoning, provided by the respondent. Part 8, Disability Questions Tests 2008/2009, provides information pertaining to four key areas of disability: Vision, hearing, mobility, and cognintive functioning. The data for Part 8 were collected over the span of five calendar quarters from October 2008 through the end of 2009. Part 9, Paradata, does not contain health related information, but rather data which are related to the interview process, including measures of time, contact-ability, and cooperation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28721.v2
assistive devicesicpsrchild healthicpsrdisabilitiesicpsrdoctor visitsicpsrfamiliesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth care accessicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrhealth statusicpsrhospitalizationicpsrhouseholdsicpsrillnessicpsrimmunizationicpsrinjuriesicpsrmental healthicpsrphysical disabilitiesicpsrpoisoningicpsrNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesCCEERC II.D. Parent/Family Practices and StructureRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingCCEERC II. Parents and FamiliesCCEERC II.E. Parent/Family CharacteristicsAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)28721Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28721.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31341MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31341MiAaIMiAaI
New York City Community Health Survey, 2009
[electronic resource]
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
2011-07-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR31341NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The New York City Community Health Survey (CHS) is a telephone survey conducted annually by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH). The CHS conducted in 2009 collected information from 9,934 New York adult residents aged 18 years and older from all 5 boroughs of New York City -- Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, Bronx, and Staten Island. All data collected are self-report. Data are available at the level of 34 different neighborhoods, defined by ZIP code. The survey is conducted to inform health program decisions, to increase the understanding of the relationship between health behavior and health status, and to support health policy positions. Respondents were asked about their physical activity, body weight, general health, and whether they had ever had a flu shot. Multiple questions addressed respondents' smoking habits, including their current smoking status, where their last cigarette was purchased, whether they were heavy smokers, whether they tried to stop smoking for a period of time, and what, if any, aids did they use to for smoking cessation. Information was collected on respondents' colonoscopy, mammogram, and pap smear screenings, as well as hypertension, mental health distress, asthma, diabetes and depression diagnosis. Additional information was collected from those diagnosed on whether they were taking any medication to control their hypertension and mental health issues. Other topics covered included second hand smoke, respondents' sexual identity, history and contraception usage, whether they had ever been tested for HIV, and information regarding respondents' fruit and vegetable, alcohol, water, and soda consumption. Weights were constructed at the UHF-level to allow the sample to provide neighborhood-level estimations of both individual adults and of households in New York City. The data contains a weight variable (WT9) that should be used in analyzing the data. Demographic variables include gender, age, marital status, employment status, race, poverty level, income, and education level.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31341.v1
alcohol consumptionicpsrcommunity healthicpsrdiabetesicpsrdiseaseicpsrexerciseicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth statusicpsrHIVicpsrhomosexualityicpsrhypertensionicpsrillnessicpsrinfluenzaicpsrmammographyicpsrmental healthicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsmokingicpsrsmoking cessationicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsICPSR II. Community and Urban StudiesICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesRCMD XII. Public OpinionNew York City Department of Health and Mental HygieneInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31341Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31341.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30462MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30462MiAaIMiAaI
Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A), 2009
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2014-09-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR30462NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A) is a national census data system of annual admissions to substance abuse treatment facilities. TEDS-A provides annual data on the number and characteristics of persons admitted to public and private substance abuse treatment programs that receive public funding. The unit of analysis is a treatment admission. TEDS consists of data reported to state substance abuse agencies by the treatment programs, which in turn report it to SAMHSA.
A sister data system, called the Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D), collects data on discharges from substance abuse treatment facilities. The first year of TEDS-A data is 1992, while the first year of TEDS-D is 2006.
TEDS variables that are required to be reported are called the "Minimum Data Set (MDS)", while those that are optional are called the "Supplemental Data Set (SuDS)".
Variables in the MDS include: information on service setting, number of prior treatments, primary source of referral, gender, race, ethnicity, education, employment status, substance(s) abused, route of administration, frequency of use, age at first use, and whether methadone was prescribed in treatment. Supplemental variables include: diagnosis codes, presence of psychiatric problems, living arrangements, source of income, health insurance, expected source of payment, pregnancy and veteran status, marital status, detailed not in labor force codes, detailed criminal justice referral codes, days waiting to enter treatment, and the number of arrests in the 30 days prior to admissions (starting in 2008) .
Substances abused include alcohol, cocaine and crack, marijuana and hashish, heroin, nonprescription methadone, other opiates and synthetics, PCP, other hallucinogens, methamphetamine, other amphetamines, other stimulants, benzodiazepines, other non-benzodiazepine tranquilizers, barbiturates, other non-barbiturate sedatives or hypnotics, inhalants, over-the-counter medications, and other substances.
Created variables include total number of substances reported, intravenous drug use (IDU), and flags for any mention of specific substances.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30462.v5
alcohol abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrinterventionicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsrICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesSAMHDA III. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS)NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30462Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30462.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34415MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34415MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health
[electronic resource]4-Year R-DAS (2002 to 2005 and 2006 to 2009)
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2014-02-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR34415NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This file includes data from the 2002 through 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) survey. The only variables included in the data file are ones that were collected in a comparable manner across all four years from 2002-2005 or from 2006-2009.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Certain questions are asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Also included are questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Demographic information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
In the income section, which was interviewer-administered, a split-sample study had been embedded within the 2006 and 2007 surveys to compare a shorter version of the income questions with a longer set of questions that had been used in previous surveys. This shorter version was adopted for the 2008 NSDUH and will be used for future NSDUHs.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34415.v1
depression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsraddictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34415Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34415.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32101MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32101MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health
[electronic resource]8-Year R-DAS (2002 to 2009)
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2014-02-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR32101NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This file includes data from the 2002 through 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) survey. The only variables included in the 8-year 2002-2009 data file are ones that were collected in a comparable manner across all 8 years.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Certain questions are asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Also included are questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Demographic information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
In the income section, which was interviewer-administered, a split-sample study had been embedded within the 2006 and 2007 surveys to compare a shorter version of the income questions with a longer set of questions that had been used in previous surveys. This shorter version was adopted for the 2008 NSDUH and will be used for future NSDUHs.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32101.v1
depression (psychology)icpsraddictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32101Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32101.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29621MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29621MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2009
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2014-09-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR29621NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2009 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For the 2008 survey, Adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. In 2008, a split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions (WHODAS vs. SDS) to assess impairment due to mental health problems. In the 2009 NSDUH, however, all of the adults in the sample received only the WHODAS questions. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29621.v5
incomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrbarbituratesicpsrpregnancyicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsraddictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingRCMD I. CrimeDSDR III. Health and MortalityNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29621Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29621.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33641MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33641MiAaIMiAaI
Well Elderly 2, Los Angeles, California, 2004-2008
[electronic resource]
Florence Clark
2013-05-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR33641NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Older people are at risk for health decline and loss of independence. Lifestyle interventions offer potential for reducing such negative outcomes. The Well Elderly study attempts to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a preventive lifestyle-based occupational therapy intervention, administered in a variety of community-based sites, in improving mental and physical well-being and cognitive functioning in ethnically diverse older people.
Participants included 460 men and women aged 60 - 95 years recruited from 21 sites in the greater Los Angeles metropolitan area. For six months elders in one group received the Well Elderly Intervention, while elders in the other group remained untreated for the first six months and received the intervention during the second six-month phase. Following receipt of the intervention, subjects in both groups remained untreated for respective twelve month spans. The manualized intervention consisted of small group and individual sessions led by a licensed occupational therapist. Typically, each group had six to eight members, all recruited from the same site and treated by the same intervener. Monthly community outings were scheduled to facilitate direct experience with intervention content such as the use of public transportation.
An assessment battery (including questionnaires, cognitive tests, and biomarker samples) measured potential mediating variables as well as outcome variables and was administered at study baseline and at subsequent six-month intervals. In addition, at baseline a set of background and control variables were measured. At the end of each assessment session (questionnaires and cognitive tests), subjects provided salivary samples. The Samples were assayed for cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone, and alpha amylase.
Assessment of health-related quality of life, life satisfaction, and depression was based on self-rated questionnaires. Cognitive tests were conducted individually. Perceived physical health and aspects of mental well-being were measured, as were depressive symptoms, and life satisfaction.
Variable categories include, health survey, stressful events, feelings, connections, attitudes, supports, beliefs, issues, activities, and demographics i.e. respondents age, sex, race, education level, employment, and income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33641.v1
activities of daily livingicpsrageicpsraging populationicpsrbiomarkersicpsrcognitionicpsrcopingicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrhealthicpsrincomeicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmental healthicpsrneighborsicpsrphysical limitationsicpsrpsychological wellbeingicpsrraceicpsrsocial contacticpsrsocial networksicpsrstressicpsrNACDA IV. Psychological Characteristics, Mental Health, and Well-Being of Older AdultsNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsDSDR IX. NIA Supported StudiesNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsNACDA III. Economic Characteristics of Older AdultsICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleClark, FlorenceInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33641Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33641.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30822MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30822MiAaIMiAaI
Survey of Midlife Development in Japan (MIDJA), April-September 2008
[electronic resource]
Carol D. Ryff
,
Shinobu Kitayam
,
Mayumi Karasawa
,
Hazel Markus
,
Norito Kawakami
,
Christopher Coe
2011-10-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR30822NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The MIDJA study is a probability sample of Japanese adults (N = 1,027) aged 30 to 79 from the Tokyo metropolitan area. Survey data were collected on sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, marital status, educational status), psychosocial characteristics (e.g., independence/interdependence, personality traits, sense of control, goal orientations, social support, family obligation, social responsibility), mental health (depression, anxiety, well-being, life satisfaction), and physical health (chronic conditions, health symptoms, functional limitations, health behaviors). These measures parallel those in a national longitudinal sample of midlife Americans known as MIDUS (ICPSR 4652: MIDUS II and ICPSR 2760: MIDUS I). The central objective is to compare the Japanese sample (MIDJA) with the United States sample (MIDUS) to test the hypothesis that the construct of interdependence predicts well-being and health in Japan, whereas the construct of independence predicts well-being and health in the United States. Cultural influences on age differences in health and well-being are also of interest.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30822.v2
marital satisfactionicpsrmedicationsicpsractivities of daily livingicpsradultsicpsralcoholicpsrfamily lifeicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth statusicpsrillnessicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrlifestylesicpsrmental healthicpsrmidlifeicpsrpsychological wellbeingicpsrsiblingsicpsrsmokingicpsrsocial indicatorsicpsrwork attitudesicpsrAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsDSDR III. Health and MortalityDSDR IX. NIA Supported StudiesNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsNACDA IV. Psychological Characteristics, Mental Health, and Well-Being of Older AdultsICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsRyff, Carol D.Kitayam, ShinobuKarasawa, MayumiMarkus, HazelKawakami, NoritoCoe, ChristopherInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30822Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30822.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR28142MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR28142MiAaIMiAaI
Sexual Assault Among Latinas (SALAS) Study, May-September 2008 [United States]
[electronic resource]
Carlos A. Cuevas
,
Chiara Sabina
2012-10-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR28142NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This Sexual Assault Among Latinas (SALAS) study was designed to examine interpersonal victimization among a national sample of Latino women, particularly focusing on help-seeking behaviors, culturally relevant factors, and psychosocial impacts. A national sample of 2,000 adult Latino women living in the United States participated in the study. An experienced survey research firm with specialization in doing surveys that ask about sensitive subjects conducted interviews between May 28, 2008 and September 3, 2008 using a Computer Assisted Telephone Interview (CATI) system. The data contain a total of 1,388 variables including demographics, victimization history, help-seeking efforts, mental health status, and religious behavior and beliefs variables.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28142.v1
acculturationicpsrassaulticpsrcopingicpsrcrime reportingicpsrgender rolesicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsrkidnappingicpsrmental healthicpsrpost-traumatic stress disordericpsrpsychological effectsicpsrpsychological wellbeingicpsrrapeicpsrreactions to crimeicpsrreligious behavioricpsrreligious beliefsicpsrsex offensesicpsrsexual abuseicpsrsexual assaulticpsrsexual harassmenticpsrsocial issuesicpsrstalkingicpsrthreatsicpsrvictim servicesicpsrvictimizationicpsrvictimsicpsrviolence against womenicpsrwomenicpsrNACJD X. VictimizationNACJD I. Attitude SurveysNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenCuevas, Carlos A.Sabina, ChiaraInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)28142Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28142.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27364MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27364MiAaIMiAaI
New York City Community Health Survey, 2008
[electronic resource]
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
2010-11-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR27364NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The New York City Community Health Survey (CHS) is a telephone survey conducted annually by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH). The CHS conducted in 2008 collected information from 7,554 New York adult residents aged 18 years and older from all 5 boroughs of New York City -- Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, Bronx, and Staten Island. All data collected are self-report. Data are available at the level of 33 different neighborhoods, defined by ZIP code. The survey is conducted to inform health program decisions, to increase the understanding of the relationship between health behavior and health status, and to support health policy positions. Respondents were asked about their physical activity, body weight, general health, and whether they had ever had a flu shot. Multiple questions addressed respondents' smoking habits, including their current smoking status, where their last cigarette was purchased, whether they were heavy smokers, whether they tried to stop smoking for a period of time, and what, if any, aids did they use to for smoking cessation. Additional information was collected on respondents' colonoscopy, mammogram, and pap smear screenings, hypertension, cholesterol, asthma, diabetes, and depression diagnosis. Information was also collected from those diagnosed on whether they were taking any medication to control their cholesterol and depression. Other topics covered included whether respondents take aspirin everyday, respondents' sexual identity, history and contraception preference, whether they had ever been tested for HIV, respondents' alcohol consumption, and whether they had ever experienced domestic violence and sexual assault. Weights were constructed at the UHF-level to allow the sample to provide neighborhood-level estimations of both individual adults and of households in New York City. The data contains a weight variable (WT9) that should be used in analyzing the data. Demographic variables include gender, age, marital status, employment status, race, poverty level, income, and education level.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27364.v1
alcohol consumptionicpsrcommunity healthicpsrdiabetesicpsrdiseaseicpsrdomestic violenceicpsrexerciseicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth care costsicpsrhealth statusicpsrHIVicpsrillnessicpsrinfluenzaicpsrmammographyicpsrmental healthicpsrsexual assaulticpsrsexual behavioricpsrsmokingicpsrsmoking cessationicpsrRCMD XII. Public OpinionICPSR II. Community and Urban StudiesICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsNew York City Department of Health and Mental HygieneInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27364Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27364.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31263MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31263MiAaIMiAaI
CRELES-2
[electronic resource]Costa Rican Longevity and Healthy Aging Study - Wave 2, 2006-2008 (Costa Rica Estudio de Longevidad y Envejecimiento Saludable, Ronda 2)
Luis Rosero-Bixby
,
Xinia Fernández
,
William H. Dow
2013-10-23Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR31263NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Costa Rican Longevity and Healthy Aging Study (CRELES, or Costa Rica Estudio de Longevidad y Envejecimiento Saludable) is a nationally representative longitudinal survey of health and lifecourse experiences of 2,827 Costa Ricans ages 60 and over in 2005, the baseline collection. CRELES-2 refers to the second wave of visits in this longitudinal study, and includes the results from these visits. The first wave of interviews, or baseline, of CRELES is also available at http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26681. The second wave fieldwork was conducted from October 2006 to July 2008, with 2,364 surviving and contacted participants. The original sample was drawn from Costa Rican residents in the 2000 population census who were born in 1945 or before, with an over-sample of the oldest-old (ages 95 and over). Vital statistics indicate that Costa Rica has an unusually high life expectancy for a middle-income country, even higher than that of the United States, but CRELES is the first nationally representative survey to investigate adult health levels in Costa Rica. CRELES public use data files contain information on a broad range of topics including self-reported physical health, psychological health, living conditions, health behaviors, health care utilization, social support, and socioeconomic status. Objective health indicators include anthropometrics, observed mobility, and biomarkers from fasting blood samples (such as cholesterol, glycosylated hemoglobin, and C-reactive protein). Mortality events are tracked and conditions surrounding death are measured in a surviving family interview.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31263.v1
health behavioricpsrhealth insuranceicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrHispanic or Latino originsicpsrpensionsicpsrphysical conditionicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrsocial networksicpsrsocial supporticpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsragingicpsrbiomarkersicpsrdieticpsrlife expectancyicpsrliving conditionsicpsrmedicationsicpsrmental healthicpsrmortality ratesicpsrolder adultsicpsrNACDA IV. Psychological Characteristics, Mental Health, and Well-Being of Older AdultsNACDA VI. Health Care Needs, Utilization, and Financing for Older AdultsDSDR II. MortalityDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsNACDA III. Economic Characteristics of Older AdultsRosero-Bixby, LuisFernández, XiniaDow, William H.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31263Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31263.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35203MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35203MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey of Children's Exposure to Violence I - 2008
[electronic resource]
David Finkelhor
,
Heather Turner
2014-08-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35203NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey of Children's Exposure to Violence I was designed to obtain lifetime and one-year incidence estimates of a comprehensive range of childhood victimizations across gender, race, and developmental stage. Conducted between January and July, 2008, it assessed the experiences of a nationally representative sample of 4,549 children aged 1 month to 17 years living in the contiguous United States (excluding New Hampshire).
The primary sample of households was selected from a nationwide sampling frame of residential telephone numbers by random digit dialing (RDD). A second sample was drawn by over-sampling United States telephone exchanges that had a population of 70 percent or more of African American, Hispanic, or low-income households.
A short interview was conducted with an adult caregiver (usually a parent) to obtain family demographic information. One child was randomly selected from all eligible children in a household by selecting the child with the most recent birthday.
The survey used an enhanced version of the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire (JVQ), an inventory of childhood victimization. This version of the JVQ obtains reports on 48 forms of offenses against youth that cover five general areas of concern including: conventional crime, child maltreatment, peer and sibling victimization, sexual assault, and witnessing and indirect victimization. Follow-up questions for each victimization item gathered additional information about the victimization incident.
The data set has 1,824 variables and 4,549 cases.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35203.v1
alcohol consumptionicpsrchild abuseicpsrchildrenicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrjuvenile victimsicpsrmental healthicpsrself concepticpsrsexual assaulticpsrvictimizationicpsryouthsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyFinkelhor, DavidTurner, HeatherInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35203Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35203.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31621MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31621MiAaIMiAaI
Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS)
[electronic resource]Transitional Care Management (TCM), Increasing Aftercare Participation for Parolees, 2004-2008 [United States]
Michael Prendergast
2014-03-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR31621NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
In an effort to increase participation in community aftercare treatment for substance-abusing offenders who have paroled from prison, the Transitional Case Management (TCM) intervention tested a model of strengths-based case management consisting of (1) completion by the inmate of a strengths and goals assessment as part of discharge planning, (2) a telephone conference call that included the inmate and people central to the inmate's aftercare plan (including the parole officer), and (3) strengths case management for 12 weeks in the community to promote treatment participation and increase the client's access to needed services. (For a more detailed description, see Prendergast Law and Cartier, 2008). With four CJ-DATS Research Centers participating, the study randomized 812 prison treatment clients to the Transitional Case Management condition or to the Standard Referral condition. Detailed assessments occurred at baseline and at three and nine months following release to parole. Data from treatment and criminal justice records, including costs, were also collected. Treatment and criminal justice staff completed surveys on agency collaboration and cooperation.
Respondents were asked questions regarding the barriers to treatment/recovery, education/job training, relationships, finance, living arrangement/housing, health and documentation. They were also asked question related to whether they needed or received certain services.
Other variables included socio-demographic and family background, peer relation and criminal history, health and psychological status, drug and treatment history.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31621.v2
case managementicpsrcommunitiesicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdrug related crimesicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrfinancial supporticpsrhealthicpsrinterventionicpsrjuvenilesicpsrmental healthicpsroffendersicpsroffensesicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtreatment outcomeicpsrtreatment programsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramPrendergast, MichaelInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31621Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31621.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32961MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32961MiAaIMiAaI
Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN), 2006-2008
[electronic resource]Visit 10 Dataset
Kim Sutton-Tyrrell
,
Faith Selzer
,
MaryFran Sowers
,
Joel Finkelstein
,
Lynda Powell
,
Ellen Gold
,
Gail David
,
Gerson Weiss
,
Karen Matthews
2014-10-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR32961NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) is a multi-site longitudinal, epidemiologic study designed to examine the health of women during their middle years. The study examines the physical, biological, psychological and social changes during this transitional period. The goal of SWAN's research is to help scientists, health care providers and women learn how mid-life experiences affect health and quality of life during aging. Data were collected about doctor visits, medical conditions, medications, treatments, medical procedures, relationships, smoking, and menopause related information such as age at pre-, peri- and post-menopause, self-attitudes, feelings, and common physical problems associated with menopause. The study began in 1995. Between 2006 and 2008, 2,245 of the 3,302 women that joined SWAN were seen for their tenth follow-up visit. The research centers are located in the following communities: Ypsilanti and Inkster, MI (University of Michigan), Boston, MA (Massachusetts General Hospital), Chicago, IL (Rush Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center), Almeda and Contra Costa County, CA (University of California, Davis and Kaiser Permanente), Los Angeles, CA (University of California, Los Angeles), Hackensack, NJ (Hackensack University Medical Center) and Pittsburgh, PA (University of Pittsburgh). SWAN participants represent five racial/ethnic groups and a variety of backgrounds and cultures. Though the New Jersey site was still part of the study, data was not collected from this site for the tenth visit. Demographic and background information includes age, language of interview, marital status, household composition, and employment.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32961.v1
health behavioricpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrhealth statusicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsrillnessicpsrinformed consenticpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmedical evaluationicpsrmedical proceduresicpsrmedicationsicpsrmenopauseicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrAfrican AmericansicpsrAsian Americansicpsrattitudesicpsrbirth controlicpsrbody heighticpsrbody weighticpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdoctor visitsicpsrethnicityicpsrfamily sizeicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrreligionicpsrsmokingicpsrstressicpsrtreatmenticpsrWhite Americansicpsrwomenicpsrwomens health careicpsrworkicpsrquality of lifeicpsrNACDA IV. Psychological Characteristics, Mental Health, and Well-Being of Older AdultsICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsSutton-Tyrrell, KimSelzer, FaithSowers, MaryFranFinkelstein, JoelPowell, LyndaGold, EllenDavid, GailWeiss, GersonMatthews, KarenInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32961Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32961.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34483MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34483MiAaIMiAaI
Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study), 1996-2008
[electronic resource]Demographic Data
Mary Haan
,
Allison Aiello
,
Hector Gonzalez
,
Ladison Hinton
,
Bill Jagust
,
Josh Miller
,
Kari Moore
,
Lynn Blythe
,
Dan Mungas
,
William Seavey
2012-12-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR34483NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study contains demographic variables for the the Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA) Series and can be used with ICPSR studies 22760, 29321, 29322, 29323. Demographic variables include gender, primary language, country of origin, state of birth, cause of death, 2000 census tract codes, birth date, date of death, and age given at follow-up visits.
About SALSA: The Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study) project tracked the incidence of physical and cognitive impairment as well as dementia and cardiovascular diseases in elderly Latinos in the Sacramento, California, region. The SALSA project aimed to assess cognitive, physical, and social functions, which include the ability to follow instructions, to perform certain movements, and to interact with others. The study explored the effects that cultural, nutritional, social, and cardiovascular risk factors have on overall health and dementia, and examined the association between diabetes and functional status.
For additional information about this data collection, see the
SALSA Web site.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34483.v1
agingicpsralcoholicpsrarthritisicpsrcardiovascular diseaseicpsrdiabetesicpsrexerciseicpsreyesighticpsrforeign bornicpsrhealthicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth statusicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsrhypertensionicpsrillnessicpsrincomeicpsrjob historyicpsrmedical careicpsrmedicationsicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrphysical conditionicpsrphysical limitationsicpsrprescription drugsicpsrreligious affiliationicpsrsmokingicpsrvision impairmenticpsrNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesRCMD IX.E. LatinoHaan, MaryAiello, AllisonGonzalez, HectorHinton, LadisonJagust, BillMiller, JoshMoore, KariBlythe, LynnMungas, DanSeavey, WilliamInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34483Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34483.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29321MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29321MiAaIMiAaI
Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study), 1996-2008
[electronic resource]Semi-Annual Phone Call Data
Mary Haan
,
Allison Aiello
,
Hector Gonzalez
,
Ladison Hinton
,
Bill Jagust
,
Josh Miller
,
Kari Moore
,
Lynn Blythe
,
Dan Mungas
,
William Seavey
2010-11-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR29321NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study) project tracked the incidence of physical and cognitive impairment as well as dementia and cardiovascular diseases in elderly Latinos in the Sacramento, California, region. The SALSA project aimed to assess cognitive, physical and social functions, which include the ability to follow instructions, to perform certain movements, and to interact with others. The project explored the effects that cultural, nutritional, social, and cardiovascular risk factors have on overall health and dementia, and examined the association between diabetes and functional status. This study, Semi-Annual Phone Call Data, contains data from the six-month follow-up call of the SALSA project. Demographic information includes age given at follow-up visits, country of birth, language, religion, marital status, educational level, occupation, household income, and size of household.
For additional information about the SALSA project, see the
SALSA Web site.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29321.v1
medicationsicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrphysical conditionicpsrphysical limitationsicpsrprescription drugsicpsrreligious affiliationicpsrsmokingicpsrvision impairmenticpsrhealth careicpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth statusicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsragingicpsralcoholicpsrarthritisicpsrcardiovascular diseaseicpsrdiabetesicpsrexerciseicpsreyesighticpsrforeign bornicpsrhypertensionicpsrillnessicpsrincomeicpsrjob historyicpsrmedical careicpsrNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsDSDR IX. NIA Supported StudiesICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesRCMD IX.E. LatinoRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingHaan, MaryAiello, AllisonGonzalez, HectorHinton, Ladison Jagust, BillMiller, JoshMoore, KariBlythe, LynnMungas, DanSeavey, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29321Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29321.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25942MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25942MiAaIMiAaI
Substance-Free Transitional Housing and Community Corrections in Washington County, Oregon, 2005-2008
[electronic resource]
Michael Finigan
,
Sonia Worcel
2013-08-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR25942NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The study investigated self-sufficiency, community adjustment, substance use, and criminal recidivism outcomes for substance abusing offenders served through the Washington County (Oregon) Community Corrections Department (WCCC) to document the value-added of providing substance-free transitional housing services. The study addressed the value-added of Oxford House and other transitional housing services to the combination of services offenders receive, and documented the relative costs and benefits of substance-free transitional housing services. Individuals were eligible for the study if they entered Oxford Houses, entered some other form of substance-free transitional housing, or could benefit from, but did not enter, any form of substance-free transitional housing. A total of 356 supervisees were eligible for the study; 301 agreed to participate in baseline interviews, and 238 participated in 12-month follow-up interviews. The study included both interview data collection and administrative records data collection. The research team also collected Housing Data (Part 2) from the housing section of the interviews and Treatment Data (Part 3) from a statewide treatment database.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25942.v1
alcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsrdrug useicpsremploymenticpsrhalfway housesicpsrhousingicpsrmental healthicpsrneighborhood characteristicsicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrparoleicpsrprobation servicesicpsrpsychological wellbeingicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD II. Community StudiesNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeFinigan, MichaelWorcel, SoniaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25942Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25942.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29323MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29323MiAaIMiAaI
Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study), 1996-2008
[electronic resource]Neuropsychological Exam Data
Mary Haan
,
Allison Aiello
,
Hector Gonzalez
,
Ladison Hinton
,
Bill Jagust
,
Josh Miller
,
Kari Moore
,
Lynn Blythe
,
Dan Mungas
,
William Seavey
2010-11-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR29323NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study) project tracked the incidence of physical and cognitive impairment as well as dementia and cardiovascular diseases in elderly Latinos in the Sacramento, California, region. The SALSA project aimed to assess cognitive, physical, and social functions, which include the ability to follow instructions, to perform certain movements, and to interact with others. The project explored the effects that cultural, nutritional, social, and cardiovascular risk factors have on overall health and dementia, and examined the association between diabetes and functional status. This study contains the neuropsychological exam data from the SALSA project. Demographic information includes age given at follow-up visits, country of birth, language, religion, marital status, educational level, occupation, household income, and size of household.
For additional information about this data collection, see the
SALSA Web site.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29323.v1
agingicpsralcoholicpsrarthritisicpsrblood pressureicpsrdiabetesicpsrexerciseicpsreyesighticpsrforeign bornicpsrhealthicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth statusicpsrheart diseaseicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsrhypertensionicpsrillnessicpsrincomeicpsrjob historyicpsrmedical careicpsrmedicationsicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrphysical conditionicpsrphysical limitationsicpsrprescription drugsicpsrreligious affiliationicpsrsmokingicpsrvision impairmenticpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesRCMD IX.E. LatinoNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsHaan, MaryAiello, AllisonGonzalez, HectorHinton, Ladison Jagust, BillMiller, JoshMoore, KariBlythe, LynnMungas, DanSeavey, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29323Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29323.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29901MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29901MiAaIMiAaI
Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D), 2008
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-11-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR29901NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D) is a national census data system of annual discharges from substance abuse treatment facilities. TEDS-D provides annual data on the number and characteristics of persons discharged from public and private substance abuse treatment programs that receive public funding. Data collected both at admission and at discharge is included. The unit of analysis is a treatment discharge. TEDS-D consists of data reported to state substance abuse agencies by the treatment programs, which in turn report it to SAMHSA.
A sister data system, called the Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A), collects data on admissions to substance abuse treatment facilities. The first year of TEDS-A data is 1992, while the first year of TEDS-D is 2006.
TEDS-D variables that are required to be reported are called the "Minimum Data Set (MDS)", while those that are optional are called the "Supplemental Data Set (SuDS)".
Variables unique to TEDS-D, and not part of TEDS-A, are the length of stay, reason for leaving treatment, and service setting at time of discharge. TEDS-D also provides many of the same variables that exist in TEDS-A. This includes information on service setting, number of prior treatments, primary source of referral, gender, race, ethnicity, education, employment status, substance(s) abused, route of administration, frequency of use, age at first use, and whether methadone was prescribed in treatment. Supplemental variables include: diagnosis codes, presence of psychiatric problems, living arrangements, source of income, health insurance, expected source of payment, pregnancy and veteran status, marital status, detailed not in labor force codes, detailed criminal justice referral codes, days waiting to enter treatment, and the number of arrests in the 30 days prior to admissions (starting in 2008) .
Substances abused include alcohol, cocaine and crack, marijuana and hashish, heroin, nonprescription methadone, other opiates and synthetics, PCP, other hallucinogens, methamphetamine, other amphetamines, other stimulants, benzodiazepines, other non-benzodiazepine tranquilizers, barbiturates, other non-barbiturate sedatives or hypnotics, inhalants, over-the-counter medications, and other substances.
Created variables include total number of substances reported, intravenous drug use (IDU), and flags for any mention of specific substances.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29901.v3
alcohol abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrinterventionicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramSAMHDA III. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS)DSDR III. Health and MortalityUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29901Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29901.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22361MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22361MiAaIMiAaI
NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development
[electronic resource]Phase IV, 2005-2008 [United States]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
2014-11-21Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR22361NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
isted below.
Day One Part I
(http://lecb.physics.lsa.umich.edu/CWIS/browser.php?ResourceId=1630)
Introductions and Participant Research Questions - James Griffin
Overview of Study - James Griffin
Schedule of Data Collection - Bonnie Knoke
Demographic Data - Bob Bradley
Day One Part II
(http://lecb.physics.lsa.umich.edu/CWIS/browser.php?ResourceId=1632)
Family Data - Margaret Owen
Orientation to using the Data and Documentation - Bonnie Knoke
Day One Part III
(http://lecb.physics.lsa.umich.edu/CWIS/browser.php?ResourceId=1633)
Data Documentation: Hands-on Training - Bonnie Knoke
Day One Part IV
(http://lecb.physics.lsa.umich.edu/CWIS/browser.php?ResourceId=1634)
Data Orientation: Merging Data Files - Robert Corwyn
Child Care Data - Margaret Owen
Day One Part V
(http://lecb.physics.lsa.umich.edu/CWIS/browser.php?ResourceId=1635)
Secondary Data Analysis - Peg Burchinal
Day One Part VI
(http://lecb.physics.lsa.umich.edu/CWIS/browser.php?ResourceId=1636)
NICHD Funding Opportunities - James Griffin
Day Two Part I
(http://lecb.physics.lsa.umich.edu/CWIS/browser.php?ResourceId=1637)
Social Data - Martha Cox
Peer Data - Martha Cox
Cognitive Data - Dan Keating
Day Two Part II
(http://lecb.physics.lsa.umich.edu/CWIS/browser.php?ResourceId=1638)
School Data - Renate Houts
Out-of-school Data - Bob Bradley
Health Data - Bob Bradley
Day Two Part III
(http://lecb.physics.lsa.umich.edu/CWIS/browser.php?ResourceId=1639)
Stats Presentation: Control Variables - Renate Houts
Day Three
(http://lecb.physics.lsa.umich.edu/CWIS/browser.php?ResourceId=1640)
Analytic Strategies - Renate Houts and Peg Burchinal
Data are available for the other phases of the NICHD STUDY OF EARLY CHILD CARE AND YOUTH DEVELOPMENT (SECCYD). See: SECCYD Phase II, 1996-1999 (ICPSR 21941), SECCYD Phase III, 2000-2004 (ICPSR 21942), SECCYD Phase IV, 2005-2008 (ICPSR 22361).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22361.v1
psychological evaluationicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial supporticpsrchildrenicpsrcognitionicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsremotional developmenticpsremploymenticpsrfamiliesicpsrfathersicpsrhome environmenticpsrlanguageicpsrloveicpsrmarital relationsicpsrmental healthicpsrmothersicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrparental influenceicpsrbehavior problemsicpsrcensus dataicpsrchild careicpsrchild developmenticpsrparentsicpsradolescentsicpsrCCEERC XII.C. School Performance and SuccessCCEERC XII. Parent, School, and Community School Readiness/Child School Success and PerformanceCCEERC I. Children and Child DevelopmentICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United StatesICPSR XVI. Social IndicatorsCCEERC I.B. Child Development and School ReadinessDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22361Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22361.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22760MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22760MiAaIMiAaI
Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study), 1996-2008
[electronic resource]
Mary Haan
,
Allison Aiello
,
Hector Gonzalez
,
Ladison Hinton
,
Bill Jagust
,
Josh Miller
,
Kari Moore
,
Lynn Blythe
,
Dan Mungas
,
William Seavey
2009-06-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR22760NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study) project tracked the incidence of physical and cognitive impairment as well as dementia and cardiovascular diseases in elderly Latinos in the Sacramento, California, region. The SALSA project aimed to assess cognitive, physical and social functions, which include the ability to follow instructions, to perform certain movements, and to interact with others. The study explored the effects that cultural, nutritional, social and cardiovascular risk factors have on overall health and dementia, and examined the association between diabetes and functional status. Demographic information includes age given at follow-up visits, country of birth, language, religion, marital status, educational level, occupation, household income, and size of household.
For additional information about this data collection, see the
SALSA Web site.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22760.v1
job historyicpsrmedical careicpsrmedicationsicpsrforeign bornicpsrhealthicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth statusicpsrheart diseaseicpsrHispanic Americansicpsrhypertensionicpsrillnessicpsrincomeicpsralcoholicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrphysical conditionicpsrphysical limitationsicpsrprescription drugsicpsrreligious affiliationicpsrsmokingicpsrarthritisicpsrvision impairmenticpsrblood pressureicpsrdiabetesicpsrelderlyicpsrexerciseicpsreye diseaseicpsreyesighticpsragingicpsrRCMD IX.E. LatinoNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingHaan, MaryAiello, AllisonGonzalez, HectorHinton, Ladison Jagust, BillMiller, JoshMoore, KariBlythe, LynnMungas, DanSeavey, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22760Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22760.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27341MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27341MiAaIMiAaI
National Health Interview Survey, 2008
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics
2010-08-26Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR27341NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) is to obtain information about the amount and distribution of illness, its effects in terms of disability and chronic impairments, and the kinds of health services people receive. Implementation of a redesigned NHIS, consisting of a basic module, a periodic module, and a topical module, began in 1997 (see NATIONAL HEALTH INTERVIEW SURVEY, 1997 [ICPSR 2954]). The 2008 NHIS contains the Household, Family, Person, Sample Adult, and Sample Child files from the basic module. Each record in Part 1, Household Level, contains data on type of living quarters, number of families in the household responding and not responding, and the month and year of the interview for each sampling unit. Part 2, Family Level, is made up of reconstructed variables from the person-level data of the basic module and includes information on sex, age, race, marital status, Hispanic origin, education, veteran status, family income, family size, major activities, health status, activity limits, and employment status, along with industry and occupation. As part of the basic module, Part 3, Person Level, provides information on all family members with respect to health status, limitation of daily activities, cognitive impairment, and health conditions. Also included are data on years at current residence, region variables, height, weight, bed days, doctor visits, hospital stays, and health care access and utilization. A randomly-selected adult in each family was interviewed for Part 4, Sample Adult, regarding respiratory conditions, renal conditions, AIDS, joint symptoms, health status, limitation of daily activities, and behaviors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity. Additionally, questions regarding oral health, asthma, balance, cancer screening, heart disease, HPV, immunization, and vision were fielded. Part 5, Sample Child, provides information from an adult in the household on medical conditions of one child in the household, such as respiratory problems, seizures, allergies, and use of special equipment like hearing aids, braces, or wheelchairs. Also included are variables regarding child behavior, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), oral health, asthma, indoor tanning, HPV, immunization, mental health, and vision. Part 6, Injury/Poison Episode, is an episode-based file that contains information about the external cause and nature of the injury or poisoning episode and what the person was doing at the time of the injury or poisoning episode, in addition to the date and place of occurrence. Part 7, Injury/Poison Episode Verbatim, contains edited narrative text descriptions of the injury or poisoning, provided by the respondent. Part 8, Paradata, does not contain health related information, but rather data which are related to the interview process, including measures of time, contact-ability, and cooperation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27341.v3
assistive devicesicpsrhealth statusicpsrhospitalizationicpsrhouseholdsicpsrillnessicpsrimmunizationicpsrinjuriesicpsrmental healthicpsrphysical disabilitiesicpsrpoisoningicpsrchild healthicpsrdisabilitiesicpsrdoctor visitsicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrfamiliesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth care accessicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrCCEERC II.E. Parent/Family CharacteristicsICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesDSDR III. Health and MortalityRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingCCEERC II.D. Parent/Family Practices and StructureNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsCCEERC II. Parents and FamiliesUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27341Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27341.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30661MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30661MiAaIMiAaI
Japanese General Social Survey (JGSS), 2008
[electronic resource]
Ichiro Tanioka
,
Noriko Iwai
,
Michio Nitta
,
Tokio Yasuda
2012-03-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR30661NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Japanese General Social Surveys (JGSS) Project is a Japanese
version of the General Social Survey (GSS) project closely replicating the original GSS of the
National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. It
provides data for analyses of Japanese society, attitudes, and
behaviors, which makes possible international comparisons. The
objectives of the JGSS project are three-fold: (1) to collect and build
cumulative data on general social surveys in Japan in a regular and
consistent manner, thus enabling a time-series analysis; (2) to
provide data for secondary analyses to researchers and university
students in various social science fields; and (3) to provide data in
a format useful for international comparative studies, research, and
reports. While the survey is conducted in Japanese language alone, the
data files and codebooks are produced and deposited both in
Japanese and English.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30661.v1
social statusicpsrtaxesicpsrtechnologyicpsrtrust (psychology)icpsrwork attitudesicpsrworkplacesicpsralcohol consumptionicpsrautomobile expensesicpsrautomobile useicpsrcareer historyicpsrcharitable donationsicpsrchildrenicpsrcommuting (travel)icpsrconsumer behavioricpsrcredit card useicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdivorceicpsrdomestic responsibilitiesicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsreuthanasiaicpsrfamily historyicpsrforeignersicpsrgender rolesicpsrgovernmenticpsrhealth statusicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrincomeicpsrjob satisfactionicpsrlabor unionsicpsrleisureicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmarriageicpsrmental healthicpsrnewspapersicpsrIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsIDRC II. Economic DataIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesTanioka, IchiroIwai, NorikoNitta, MichioYasuda, TokioInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30661Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30661.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31704MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31704MiAaIMiAaI
Systematic Review of the Effects of Parental Imprisonment on Child Antisocial Behavior and Mental Health, 1960-2008
[electronic resource]
Joseph Murray
,
David P. Farrington
,
Ivana Sekol
,
Rikke F. Olsen
2012-05-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR31704NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The two main aims for the review were to assess evidence on whether parental imprisonment is a risk factor for undesirable child outcomes and to assess evidence on whether parental imprisonment is a causal risk factor. A third aim of the review was to investigate whether associations between parental imprisonment and child outcomes differ according to child, parent, and environmental characteristics. Between June and September 2008, researchers searched for studies that met the eligibility criteria. Several strategies were used to conduct an exhaustive search for eligible studies. Researchers started with an existing set of documents collected by Joseph Murray during his previous research on the effects of parental imprisonment on children and then used three methods to search for additional studies. First, researchers searched 23 electronic databases for the years 1960-2008. The same keywords were used to search each database. Second, researchers examined bibliographies of previous reviews of studies on the effects of parental imprisonment on children. Third, researchers contacted experts in the field. Two groups of researchers and practitioners were emailed and asked to inform researchers of any studies they thought might be eligible for the review. The 16 studies included in the review were coded for the following key features: reference information, sample characteristics, details about the measure of parental imprisonment, details of subsamples, and multiple comparisons made in the study, details of the comparison group(s) used to derive effect sizes, types of outcome measured, and measurement details, methods used to control for confounding variables to estimate causal effects, methodological quality of the study for drawing conclusions about risk factors and causal risk factors, and statistical information used to derive an effect size.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31704.v1
behavior problemsicpsrchild rearingicpsrchild welfareicpsrchildrenicpsrimprisonmenticpsrmental disordersicpsrmental healthicpsrparenting skillsicpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemMurray, JosephFarrington, David P.Sekol, IvanaOlsen, Rikke F.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31704Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31704.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29322MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29322MiAaIMiAaI
Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study), 1996-2008
[electronic resource]Neuroclinical Exam Data
Mary Haan
,
Allison Aiello
,
Hector Gonzalez
,
Ladison Hinton
,
Bill Jagust
,
Josh Miller
,
Kari Moore
,
Lynn Blythe
,
Dan Mungas
,
William Seavey
2010-11-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR29322NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study) project tracked the incidence of physical and cognitive impairment as well as dementia and cardiovascular diseases in elderly Latinos in the Sacramento, California, region. The SALSA project aimed to assess cognitive, physical, and social functions, which include the ability to follow instructions, to perform certain movements, and to interact with others. The study explored the effects that cultural, nutritional, social, and cardiovascular risk factors have on overall health and dementia, and examined the association between diabetes and functional status. This study contains the neuroclinical exam data from the SALSA project. Demographic information includes age given at follow-up visits, country of birth, language, religion, marital status, educational level, occupation, household income, and size of household.
For additional information about the SALSA project and data, see the
SALSA Web site.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29322.v1
religious affiliationicpsragingicpsralcoholicpsrarthritisicpsrblood pressureicpsrdiabetesicpsrexerciseicpsreyesighticpsrforeign bornicpsrhealthicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth statusicpsrheart diseaseicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsrhypertensionicpsrillnessicpsrincomeicpsrjob historyicpsrmedical careicpsrmedicationsicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrphysical conditionicpsrphysical limitationsicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsmokingicpsrvision impairmenticpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingRCMD IX.E. LatinoICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsHaan, MaryAiello, AllisonGonzalez, HectorHinton, Ladison Jagust, BillMiller, JoshMoore, KariBlythe, LynnMungas, DanSeavey, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29322Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29322.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25505MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25505MiAaIMiAaI
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2007-2008
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics
2012-02-22Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR25505NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
a decrease in 12- to 19-year-olds from previous cycles. The oversample of pregnant women and adolescents in the survey from 1999-2006 was discontinued to allow for the oversampling of the Hispanic population. NCHS is working with public health agencies to increase knowledge of the health status of older Americans. NHANES has a primary role in this endeavor. In the examination, all participants visit the physician who takes their pulse or blood pressure. Dietary interviews and body measurements are included for everyone. All but the very young have a blood sample taken and see the dentist. Depending upon the age of the participant, the rest of the examination includes tests and procedures to assess the various aspects of health listed above. Usually, the older the individual, the more extensive the examination.
Demographic data file variables are grouped into three broad categories: (1)
Status Variables: Provide core information on the survey participant. Examples
of the core variables include interview status, examination status, and
sequence number. (Sequence number [SEQN] is a unique ID number assigned to each
sample person and is required to match the information on this demographic file
to the rest of the NHANES 2007-2008 data.) (2) Recoded Demographic Variables:
The variables include age (age in months for persons under age 80, age in years
for 1 to 80-year-olds, and a top-coded age group of 80 years and older), gender, a
race/ethnicity variable, an current or highest grade of education completed,
(less than high school, high school, and more than high school education),
country of birth (United States, Mexico, or other foreign born), ratio of
family income to poverty threshold, income, and a pregnancy status variable
(adjudicated from various pregnancy-related variables). Some of the groupings
were made due to limited sample sizes for the two-year dataset. (3) Interview and
Examination Sample Weight Variables: Sample weights are available for
analyzing NHANES 2007-2008 data. Most data analyses require either the
interviewed sample weight (variable name: WTINT2YR) or examined sample weight
(variable name: WTMEC2YR). The two-year sample weights (WTINT2YR, WTMEC2YR)
should be used for NHANES 2007-2008 analyses.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25505.v3
nutritionicpsroccupationsicpsrphysical fitnessicpsrpopulationsicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsrreproductive historyicpsrrespiratory diseasesicpsrrisk factorsicpsrsexual behavioricpsrvisionicpsralcohol consumptionicpsrallergiesicpsranxietyicpsrcardiovascular diseaseicpsrcognitive functioningicpsrconsumer behavioricpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug useicpsremotional statesicpsrsmokingicpsrsocial indicatorsicpsrsocial supporticpsrtreatmenticpsrtuberculosisicpsremotional supporticpsrethnicityicpsrmedical evaluationicpsrmental healthicpsrdepressionicpsrdiabetesicpsrdieticpsrsleep disordersicpsrdiseaseicpsrincomeicpsrmalnutritionicpsrmedical conditionsicpsracculturationicpsragingicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth careicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrvaccinesicpsrhealth statusicpsrhearing (physiology)icpsrhospitalizationicpsrimmunizationicpsrNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsDSDR III. Health and MortalityDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityNACDA VI. Health Care Needs, Utilization, and Financing for Older AdultsFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25505Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25505.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34837MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34837MiAaIMiAaI
Age and Generations Study, 2007-2008
[electronic resource]
Marcie Pitt-Catsouphes
,
Michael Smyer
2013-10-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34837NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Age and Generations Study documented employee and employer outcomes related to the experiences of multi-generational teams in five industry sectors, and examined how the work relationships of these team members might change over time. The five industry sectors included in this collection were retail, pharmaceuticals, finance, health care, and higher education. Various questions focused on the organization and on how the interactions of multi-generational work units affected outcomes for employees in the department/unit, as well as their performance and productivity outcomes. Additionally, the survey requested information on employees' perceptions of their work experience, work that is done by their work groups, opportunities for learning and development, organizational policies, and their assessments of their health and well-being. Demographic variables included gender, birth year, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, number of children, hourly wage, salary, and household income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34837.v1
employment practicesicpsrfinancial industryicpsrgenerationsicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth statusicpsrhigher educationicpsrintergenerational relationsicpsrjob performanceicpsrjob satisfactionicpsrlabor forceicpsrmental healthicpsrolder workersicpsrorganizationsicpsragingicpsrcareer developmenticpsrdependentsicpsrdrug industryicpsremotional problemsicpsremployee benefitsicpsremployersicpsremploymenticpsrproductivityicpsrquality of lifeicpsrretail industryicpsrtrainingicpsrwages and salariesicpsrwork attitudesicpsrwork environmenticpsrworkersicpsrworking hoursicpsrICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR XV.A. Organizational Behavior, United StatesICPSR XV. Organizational BehaviorPitt-Catsouphes, MarcieSmyer, MichaelInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34837Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34837.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27241MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27241MiAaIMiAaI
Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A), 2008
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2014-09-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR27241NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A) is a national census data system of annual admissions to substance abuse treatment facilities. TEDS-A provides annual data on the number and characteristics of persons admitted to public and private substance abuse treatment programs that receive public funding. The unit of analysis is a treatment admission. TEDS consists of data reported to state substance abuse agencies by the treatment programs, which in turn report it to SAMHSA.
A sister data system, called the Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D), collects data on discharges from substance abuse treatment facilities. The first year of TEDS-A data is 1992, while the first year of TEDS-D is 2006.
TEDS variables that are required to be reported are called the "Minimum Data Set (MDS)", while those that are optional are called the "Supplemental Data Set (SuDS)".
Variables in the MDS include: information on service setting, number of prior treatments, primary source of referral, gender, race, ethnicity, education, employment status, substance(s) abused, route of administration, frequency of use, age at first use, and whether methadone was prescribed in treatment. Supplemental variables include: diagnosis codes, presence of psychiatric problems, living arrangements, source of income, health insurance, expected source of payment, pregnancy and veteran status, marital status, detailed not in labor force codes, detailed criminal justice referral codes, days waiting to enter treatment, and the number of arrests in the 30 days prior to admissions (starting in 2008).
Substances abused include alcohol, cocaine and crack, marijuana and hashish, heroin, nonprescription methadone, other opiates and synthetics, PCP, other hallucinogens, methamphetamine, other amphetamines, other stimulants, benzodiazepines, other non-benzodiazepine tranquilizers, barbiturates, other non-barbiturate sedatives or hypnotics, inhalants, over-the-counter medications, and other substances.
Created variables include total number of substances reported, intravenous drug use (IDU), and flags for any mention of specific substances.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27241.v7
alcohol abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrinterventionicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsrSAMHDA III. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS)RCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27241Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27241.v7 nmm 22 4500ICPSR26701MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR26701MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2008
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2014-09-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR26701NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. Detailed NSDUH 2008 documentation is available from SAMHSA. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2008 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For this 2008 survey, Adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. A split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions to assess impairment due to mental health problems. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26701.v5
addictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrRCMD I. CrimeDSDR III. Health and MortalitySAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)26701Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26701.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32721MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32721MiAaIMiAaI
Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), 2005-2007
[electronic resource]Visit 09 Dataset
Kim Sutton-Tyrell
,
Faith Selzer
,
MaryFran Sowers
,
Joel Finkelstein
,
Lynda Powell
,
Ellen Gold
,
Gail Greendale
,
Gerson Weiss
,
Karen Matthews
2014-09-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR32721NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), is a multi-site longitudinal, epidemiologic study designed to examine the health of women during their middle years. The study examines the physical, biological, psychological and social changes during this transitional period. The goal of SWAN's research is to help scientists, health care providers and women learn how mid-life experiences affect health and quality of life during aging. Data were collected about doctor visits, medical conditions, medications, treatments, medical procedures, relationships, smoking, and menopause related information such as age at pre-, peri- and post-menopause, self-attitudes, feelings, and common physical problems associated with menopause. The study began in 1995. Between 2005 and 2007, 2,255 of the 3,302 women that joined SWAN were seen for their ninth follow-up visit. The research centers are located in the following communities: Ypsilanti and Inkster, MI (University of Michigan); Boston, MA (Massachusetts General Hospital); Chicago, IL (Rush Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center); Alameda and Contra Costa County, CA (University of California-Davis and Kaiser Permanente); Los Angeles, CA (University of California-Los Angeles); Hackensack, NJ (Hackensack University Medical Center); and Pittsburgh, PA (University of Pittsburgh). SWAN participants represent five racial/ethnic groups and a variety of backgrounds and cultures. Though the New Jersey site was still part of the study, data was not collected from this site for the ninth visit. Demographic and background information includes age, language of interview, marital status, household composition, and employment.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32721.v1
African AmericansicpsrAsian Americansicpsrattitudesicpsrbirth controlicpsrbody heighticpsrbody weighticpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdoctor visitsicpsrethnicityicpsrfamily sizeicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrhealth statusicpsrWhite Americansicpsrwomenicpsrwomens health careicpsrworkicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsrillnessicpsrinformed consenticpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmedical evaluationicpsrmedical proceduresicpsrmedicationsicpsrmenopauseicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrquality of lifeicpsrreligionicpsrsmokingicpsrstressicpsrtreatmenticpsrICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleNACDA IV. Psychological Characteristics, Mental Health, and Well-Being of Older AdultsNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsSutton-Tyrell, KimSelzer, FaithSowers, MaryFranFinkelstein, JoelPowell, LyndaGold, EllenGreendale, GailWeiss, GersonMatthews, KarenInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32721Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32721.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21880MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21880MiAaIMiAaI
Supplemental Mental Health Treatment for Batterer Program Participants in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2004-2007
[electronic resource]
Edward W. Gondolf
2013-05-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR21880NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The study was conducted to investigate the extent of mental health screening, referral compliance, and treatment effectiveness of men enrolled in batterer counseling programs. Specifically, the study looked at treatment compliance and effectiveness among men referred for mental health treatment in a program for men in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania who were court ordered to receive batterer counseling, from 2004 to 2006. The final sample includes a total of 992 men, 478 men who were referred to treatment and 514 men who were not. The study included a service-delivery evaluation of the screening and referral and an outcome evaluation of the supplemental mental health counseling. The outcome evaluation was based on a quasi-experimental design comparing a subsample of men under a mandatory referral to those under a voluntary referral, and also men who actually obtained mental health treatment to those who were referred but untreated. Data were collected using questionnaires administered to both the men and their female partners over a 12 month period following intake into the counseling program, as well as clinical and arrest records to assess the extent to which the men complied with the referrals, their responses to the referral, and the outcomes from participation in the program, measured in terms of re-assault of their female partners.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21880.v1
abuseicpsralcohol abuseicpsrassaulticpsrbattered womenicpsrcounselingicpsrcounseling servicesicpsrdomestic assaulticpsrdomestic violenceicpsrdrug useicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsroutcome evaluationicpsrtreatment complianceicpsrtreatment outcomeicpsrtreatment programsicpsrviolence against womenicpsrNACJD X. VictimizationNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemGondolf, Edward W.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21880Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21880.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27301MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27301MiAaIMiAaI
Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D), 2007
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-11-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR27301NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D) is a national census data system of annual discharges from substance abuse treatment facilities. TEDS-D provides annual data on the number and characteristics of persons discharged from public and private substance abuse treatment programs that receive public funding. Data collected both at admission and at discharge is included. The unit of analysis is a treatment discharge. TEDS-D consists of data reported to state substance abuse agencies by the treatment programs, which in turn report it to SAMHSA.
A sister data system, called the Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A), collects data on admissions to substance abuse treatment facilities. The first year of TEDS-A data is 1992, while the first year of TEDS-D is 2006.
TEDS-D variables that are required to be reported are called the "Minimum Data Set (MDS)", while those that are optional are called the "Supplemental Data Set (SuDS)".
Variables unique to TEDS-D, and not part of TEDS-A, are the length of stay, reason for leaving treatment, and service setting at time of discharge. TEDS-D also provides many of the same variables that exist in TEDS-A. This includes information on service setting, number of prior treatments, primary source of referral, gender, race, ethnicity, education, employment status, substance(s) abused, route of administration, frequency of use, age at first use, and whether methadone was prescribed in treatment. Supplemental variables include: diagnosis codes, presence of psychiatric problems, living arrangements, source of income, health insurance, expected source of payment, pregnancy and veteran status, marital status, detailed not in labor force codes, detailed criminal justice referral codes, days waiting to enter treatment, and the number of arrests in the 30 days prior to admissions (starting in 2008) .
Substances abused include alcohol, cocaine and crack, marijuana and hashish, heroin, nonprescription methadone, other opiates and synthetics, PCP, other hallucinogens, methamphetamine, other amphetamines, other stimulants, benzodiazepines, other non-benzodiazepine tranquilizers, barbiturates, other non-barbiturate sedatives or hypnotics, inhalants, over-the-counter medications, and other substances.
Created variables include total number of substances reported, intravenous drug use (IDU), and flags for any mention of specific substances.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27301.v4
alcohol abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrinterventionicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsrICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramSAMHDA III. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS)RCMD V. Health and Well-BeingDSDR III. Health and MortalityUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27301Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27301.v4 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29654MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29654MiAaIMiAaI
Hispanic Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Study of the Elderly (HEPESE) Wave 6, 2006-2007 [Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas]
[electronic resource]
Kyriakos S. Markides
,
Laura A. Ray
,
Ronald Angel
,
David V. Espino
2012-02-23Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR29654NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This dataset comprises the fifth follow-up of the baseline Hispanic EPESE (HISPANIC ESTABLISHED POPULATIONS FOR THE EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES OF THE ELDERLY, 1993-1994: [ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA, COLORADO, NEW MEXICO, AND TEXAS] [ICPSR 2851]). The baseline Hispanic EPESE collected data on a representative sample of community-dwelling Mexican Americans, aged 65 years and older, residing in the five southwestern states of Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas. The primary purpose of the series was to provide estimates of the prevalence of key physical health conditions, mental health conditions, and functional impairments in older Mexican Americans and to compare these estimates with those for other populations. The Hispanic EPESE provides data on risk factors for mortality and morbidity in Mexican Americans in order to contrast how these factors operate differently in non-Hispanic White Americans, African Americans, and other major ethnic groups. The public-use data cover demographic characteristics (age, sex, type of Hispanic race, income, education, marital status, number of children, employment, and religion), height, weight, social and physical functioning, chronic conditions, related health problems, health habits, self-reported use of dental, hospital, and nursing home services, and depression. Subsequent follow-ups provide a cross-sectional examination of the predictors of mortality, changes in health outcomes, and institutionalization, and other changes in living arrangements, as well as changes in life situations and quality of life issues. During this 6th Wave, 2006-2007, reinterviews were conducted either in person or by proxy, with 921 of the original respondents. This fifth follow-up includes an additional sample of 621 Mexican Americans aged 75 years and over with higher average-levels of education than those of the surviving cohort, increasing the total number of respondents to 1,542. By diversifying the aged 75 years and older cohort, a better understanding can be gained of the influence of socioeconomic and cultural variations on the lives and health older Mexican Americans.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29654.v1
health problemsicpsrhealth statusicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsrlife expectancyicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmental healthicpsrMexican Americansicpsrmortality ratesicpsrolder adultsicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrquality of lifeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrhealth behavioricpsrDSDR IX. NIA Supported StudiesICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsRCMD IX.E. LatinoRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsDSDR III. Health and MortalityMarkides, Kyriakos S.Ray, Laura A.Angel, RonaldEspino, David V.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29654Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29654.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27201MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27201MiAaIMiAaI
National Health Interview Survey, 2007
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics
2010-08-26Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR27201NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
ovide dummy records to fill in the missing information for Part 5, Sample Child, and Part 9, Child Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Part 12, Paradata, does not contain health related information, but rather data which are related to the interview process, including measures of time, contact-ability, and cooperation. RAT_CAT3 Update, Part 13, corrects an error in the 2007 Family Level variable RAT_CAT3.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27201.v2
assistive devicesicpsrhealth statusicpsrhospitalizationicpsrhouseholdsicpsrillnessicpsrimmunizationicpsrinjuriesicpsrmental healthicpsrphysical disabilitiesicpsrpoisoningicpsrchild healthicpsrdisabilitiesicpsrdoctor visitsicpsrfamiliesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth care accessicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrCCEERC II. Parents and FamiliesRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingCCEERC II.D. Parent/Family Practices and StructureICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsCCEERC II.E. Parent/Family CharacteristicsAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsDSDR III. Health and MortalityUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27201Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27201.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR24280MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR24280MiAaIMiAaI
Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A), 2007
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2014-09-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR24280NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A) is a national census data system of annual admissions to substance abuse treatment facilities. TEDS-A provides annual data on the number and characteristics of persons admitted to public and private substance abuse treatment programs that receive public funding. The unit of analysis is a treatment admission. TEDS consists of data reported to state substance abuse agencies by the treatment programs, which in turn report it to SAMHSA.
A sister data system, called the Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D), collects data on discharges from substance abuse treatment facilities. The first year of TEDS-A data is 1992, while the first year of TEDS-D is 2006.
TEDS variables that are required to be reported are called the "Minimum Data Set (MDS)", while those that are optional are called the "Supplemental Data Set (SuDS)".
Variables in the MDS include: information on service setting, number of prior treatments, primary source of referral, gender, race, ethnicity, education, employment status, substance(s) abused, route of administration, frequency of use, age at first use, and whether methadone was prescribed in treatment. Supplemental variables include: diagnosis codes, presence of psychiatric problems, living arrangements, source of income, health insurance, expected source of payment, pregnancy and veteran status, marital status, detailed not in labor force codes, detailed criminal justice referral codes, days waiting to enter treatment, and the number of arrests in the 30 days prior to admissions (starting in 2008).
Substances abused include alcohol, cocaine and crack, marijuana and hashish, heroin, nonprescription methadone, other opiates and synthetics, PCP, other hallucinogens, methamphetamine, other amphetamines, other stimulants, benzodiazepines, other non-benzodiazepine tranquilizers, barbiturates, other non-barbiturate sedatives or hypnotics, inhalants, over-the-counter medications, and other substances.
Created variables include total number of substances reported, intravenous drug use (IDU), and flags for any mention of specific substances.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24280.v9
drug treatmenticpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrinterventionicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsralcohol abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrSAMHDA III. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS)ICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)24280Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24280.v9 nmm 22 4500ICPSR23782MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR23782MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2007
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-06-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR23782NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series
(formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily
measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United
States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as
annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit
drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households
aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as
lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes:
marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants,
alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including
pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey
covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for
treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be
applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both
substance abuse and mental health related disorders. Respondents were
also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts,
health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record,
problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing.
Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the
2007 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to
17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such
as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends,
social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance
abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes
toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures
focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained
were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of
using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal
behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most
often were introduced with the 1999 survey. Background information
includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational
level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23782.v4
addictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrRCMD I. CrimeDSDR III. Health and MortalityNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)23782Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23782.v4 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20626MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20626MiAaIMiAaI
Prevalence and Case Characteristics of Drug-Facilitated, Incapacitated, and Forcible Rape Among College Students and Other Young Women in the United States, 2006
[electronic resource]
Dean G. Kilpatrick
,
Heidi S. Resnick
,
Kenneth J. Ruggiero
,
Lauren M. Conoscenti
,
Jenna McCauley
2010-02-26Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR20626NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study had four key goals. The first goal was to identify how many women in the United States and in college settings have ever been raped or sexually assaulted during their lifetime and within the past year. The next goal was to identify key case characteristics of drug-facilitated and forcible rapes. The third goal was to examine factors that affect the willingness of women to report rape to law enforcement or seek help from their support network. The last goal was to make comparisons between the different types of rape. Part 1 (General Population) data consisted of a national telephone household sample of 3,001 United States women, whereas Part 2 (College Population) data consisted of 2,000 college women selected from a reasonably representative national list of women attending four year colleges and universities. Both data parts contain the same 399 variables. Interviews were completed between January 23 and June 26, 2006. Respondents were asked questions regarding risk perception, fear of violence, and accommodation behavior. The women were also asked their opinions and attitudes about reporting rape to the authorities and disclosing rape to family members, peers, or other individuals. This includes questions about barriers to reporting and experiences that women have had being the recipient of a disclosure from a friend, relative, or other individual. The respondents were asked a series of questions about rape, including different types of forcible, drug- or alcohol-facilitated, and incapacitated rape. For women who endorsed one or more rape experiences, a wide range of rape characteristics were assessed including characteristics around the nature of the event, perpetrator-victim relationship, occurrence of injury, involvement of drugs or alcohol, receipt of medical care, and whether the rape was reported to the authorities. The respondents were also asked a series of questions regarding substance use, including prescription and illegal drugs and alcohol. Additionally, a series of questions related to post-traumatic stress disorder and depression were asked. Finally, the women were asked to provide basic demographic information such as age, race, ethnicity, and income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20626.v1
drug abuseicpsrmental healthicpsrpost-traumatic stress disordericpsrprescription drugsicpsrrapeicpsrsexual assaulticpsralcohol abuseicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrNACJD X. VictimizationNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemKilpatrick, Dean G.Resnick, Heidi S.Ruggiero, Kenneth J.Conoscenti, Lauren M.McCauley, JennaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20626Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20626.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21184MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21184MiAaIMiAaI
Developing and Validating a Brief Jail Mental Health Screen in Maryland and New York, 2005-2006
[electronic resource]
Henry J. Steadman
2008-09-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR21184NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The goal of this research project was to develop an efficient mental health screen that would aid in the early identification of severe mental illnesses and other acute psychiatric problems during the jail intake process. The researchers sought to validate the Brief Jail Mental Health Screen (BJMHS) as such a tool. Participants in the study included male and female jail detainees admitted to one of four county jails, two in Maryland and two in New York, from November 2005 to June 2006. A total of 10,562 jail detainees were screened using the BJMHS-R (Part 1). The screening data were used to identify a sub-sample of detainees who were systematically sampled for a detailed clinical assessment, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID), which was conducted by a trained research interviewer in order to validate the screen. A subset of 464 jail detainees completed the SCID interviews (Part 2). Part 1, Tracking Data, contains 54 variables, including items and scores from the BJMHS-R, that were used to used to identify and generate a list of potential detainee participants for the SCID interview. Part 2, Interview Data, contains 326 variables, including items and scores from both the BJMHS-R and the SCID interviews, that were used to validate the screen.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21184.v1
emotional statesicpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrwomenicpsrfemale inmatesicpsrfemale offendersicpsrjail inmatesicpsrjailsicpsrmental disordersicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrpsychiatric servicesicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemSteadman, Henry J.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21184Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21184.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20541MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20541MiAaIMiAaI
National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP)
[electronic resource]Wave 1
Linda J. Waite
,
Edward O. Laumann
,
Wendy Levinson
,
Stacy Tessler Lindau
,
Colm A. O'Muircheartaigh
2014-04-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR20541NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The health of older adults is influenced by many factors. One of the least understood is the role that social support and personal relationships may play in healthy aging. The National Social Life, Health and Aging Project (NSHAP) is the first population-based study of health and social factors on a national scale, aiming to understand the well-being of older, community-dwelling Americans by examining the interactions among physical health, illness, medication use, cognitive function, emotional health, sensory function, health behaviors, and social connectedness. It is designed to provide health providers, policy makers, and individuals with useful information and insights into these factors, particularly on social and intimate relationships. The National Opinion Research Center (NORC), along with Principal Investigators at the University of Chicago, conducted more than 3,000 interviews during 2005 and 2006 with a nationally representative sample of adults aged 57 to 85. Face-to-face interviews and biomeasure collection took place in respondents' homes. The following files constitute Wave 1: Core Data, Marital/Cohabiting History Data, Social Networks Data, Medications Data, and Sexual Partners Data.
Included in the Core file (Part 1) are demographic characteristics, such as gender, age, education, race, and ethnicity. Other topics covered respondents' social networks, social and cultural activity, physical and mental health including cognition, well-being, illness, medications and alternative therapies, history of sexual and intimate partnerships and patient-physician communication, in addition to bereavement items. In addition data was collected from respondents on the following items and modules: social activity items, physical contact module, sexual interest module, get up and go assessment of physical function and a panel of biomeasures including, weight, waist circumference, height, blood pressure, smell, saliva collection, taste, and a self-administered vaginal swab for female respondents. The Core file also contains a count of the total number of drugs taken, and a variable for each observed therapeutic category, indicating whether the respondent reported taking one or more medications in that category. These variables are derived from the information in the medications file, and thus are guaranteed to be consistent with it. The Marital/Cohabiting History file (Part 2) contains one record for each marriage or cohabitation identified in Section 3A of the questionnaire. The Social Networks file (Part 3) contains one record for each person identified on the network roster. Respondents who refused to participate in the roster or who did not identify anyone are not represented in this file. The Medications file (Part 4) contains one record for each item listed in the medications log (including alternative medicines and nutritional products). Respondents who did not report taking any medications or who refused to participate in this module are not represented in this file. Lastly, the Sexual Partners file (Part 5) contains one record for each sexual partner identified in Section 3A of the questionnaire.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20541.v6
agingicpsranxietyicpsrattitudesicpsrbody heighticpsrbody weighticpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdoctor visitsicpsrdrugsicpsrethnicityicpsrfamily sizeicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrhealth statusicpsrillnessicpsrintimate partnersicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmedical evaluationicpsrmedical proceduresicpsrmedicationsicpsrmenopauseicpsrmental healthicpsrmorbidityicpsrnutritionicpsrolder adultsicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsocial networksicpsrsocial supporticpsrDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsDSDR IX. NIA Supported StudiesICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsDSDR III. Health and MortalityWaite, Linda J.Laumann, Edward O.Levinson, WendyLindau, Stacy TesslerO'Muircheartaigh, Colm A.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20541Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20541.v6 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27362MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27362MiAaIMiAaI
New York City Community Health Survey, 2006
[electronic resource]
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
2010-09-02Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR27362NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The New York City Community Health Survey (CHS) is a telephone survey conducted annually by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH). The CHS conducted in 2006 collected information from 9,683 New York adult residents aged 18 years and older from all 5 boroughs of New York City -- Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, Bronx, and Staten Island. All data collected are self-report. Data are available at the level of 33 different neighborhoods, defined by ZIP code. The survey is conducted to inform health program decisions, to increase the understanding of the relationship between health behavior and health status, and to support health policy positions. Respondents were asked about their physical activity participation, body weight, general health, and whether they had ever had a flu or pneumonia shot. Multiple questions addressed respondents' smoking habits, whether they thought of quitting, the age at which they began smoking, the number of cigarettes they smoked per day, where their last cigarette came from, whether they stopped smoking for a period of time, and their current smoking status. Additional information was collected on respondents' second hand smoke exposure, colonoscopy, mammogram and pap smear screenings, and diabetes, asthma, depression and hypertension diagnosis. Other topics covered included respondents' sexual history, whether they had ever been tested for HIV, and whether they had ever experienced psychological distress or domestic violence. Weights were constructed at the UHF-level to allow the sample to provide neighborhood-level estimations of both individual adults and of households in New York City. The data contain a weight variable (WT7) that should be used in analyzing the data. Demographic variables include gender, age, marital status, employment status, race, poverty level, income, and education level.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27362.v1
community healthicpsrdiabetesicpsrdiseasesicpsrexerciseicpsrhealthicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth care costsicpsrhealth statusicpsrHIVicpsrillnessicpsrinfluenzaicpsrmammographyicpsrmental healthicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsmokingicpsrsmoking cessationicpsrRCMD XII. Public OpinionICPSR II. Community and Urban StudiesRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsNew York City Department of Health and Mental HygieneInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27362Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27362.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32122MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32122MiAaIMiAaI
Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), 2004-2006
[electronic resource]Visit 08 Dataset
Kim Sutton-Tyrell
,
Faith Selzer
,
MaryFran Sowers
,
Joel Finkelstein
,
Lynda Powell
,
Ellen Gold
,
Gail Greendale
,
Gerson Weiss
,
Karen Matthews
2014-09-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR32122NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), is a multi-site longitudinal, epidemiologic study designed to examine the health of women during their middle years. The study examines the physical, biological, psychological and social changes during this transitional period. The goal of SWAN's research is to help scientists, health care providers and women learn how mid-life experiences affect health and quality of life during aging. Data were collected about doctor visits, medical conditions, medications, treatments, medical procedures, relationships, smoking, and menopause related information such as age at pre-, peri- and post-menopause, self-attitudes, feelings, and common physical problems associated with menopause. The study began in 1995. Between 2004 and 2006, 2,278 of the 3,302 women that joined SWAN were seen for their eighth follow-up visit. The research centers are located in the following communities: Ypsilanti and Inkster, MI (University of Michigan); Boston, MA (Massachusetts General Hospital); Chicago, IL (Rush Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center); Alameda and Contra Costa County, CA (University of California-Davis and Kaiser Permanente); Los Angeles, CA (University of California-Los Angeles); Hackensack, NJ (Hackensack University Medical Center); and Pittsburgh, PA (University of Pittsburgh). SWAN participants represent five racial/ethnic groups and a variety of backgrounds and cultures. Though the New Jersey site was still part of the study, data was not collected from this site for the eighth visit. Demographic and background information includes age, language of interview, marital status, household composition, and employment.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32122.v1
African AmericansicpsrAsian Americansicpsrattitudesicpsrbirth controlicpsrbody heighticpsrbody weighticpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdoctor visitsicpsrethnicityicpsrfamily sizeicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrhealth statusicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsrillnessicpsrinformed consenticpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmedical evaluationicpsrmedical proceduresicpsrmedicationsicpsrmenopauseicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrquality of lifeicpsrreligionicpsrsmokingicpsrstressicpsrtreatmenticpsrWhite Americansicpsrwomenicpsrwomens health careicpsrworkicpsrICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleNACDA IV. Psychological Characteristics, Mental Health, and Well-Being of Older AdultsNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsSutton-Tyrell, KimSelzer, FaithSowers, MaryFranFinkelstein, JoelPowell, LyndaGold, EllenGreendale, GailWeiss, GersonMatthews, KarenInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32122Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32122.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04667MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04667MiAaIMiAaI
Eurobarometer 64.4
[electronic resource]Mental Well-Being, Telecommunications, Harmful Internet Content, and Farm Animal Welfare, December 2005-January 2006
Antonis Papacostas
2010-04-26Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4667NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This round of Eurobarometer surveys diverged from the standard Eurobarometer measures and queried respondents on their opinions regarding mental well-being, telecommunications, harmful Internet content, and farm animal welfare. The first topic covered physical and mental well-being. Respondents were asked (1) about the state of their mental well-being over the previous four weeks, and the degree to which health concerns limited daily moderate physical activities, (2) about the effects of physical health and emotional problems on regular activities, (3) whether they were treated for mental illnesses, how often they sought help for mental problems, and where they turned to get support, (4) how easy or difficult they found acquiring information about mental health problems, and (5) how Europeans perceived people with a mental illness. The second topic addressed the access and use of telecommunications. Respondents were queried as to whether they used a fixed telephone, mobile telephone, computer, the Internet, or television in the household, what operator and company they used to provide the services, whether they considered changing providers, and their main reasons for changing. The third topic focused on the respondents' knowledge of and opinions about harmful Internet content. Respondents answered questions concerning Internet use and safety for their children and procedures for reporting illegal and harmful content. The final topic, farm animal welfare, included questions on food purchases, food consumption, and respondents' knowledge of and opinions about the welfare of farm animals. Background information includes respondent's age, gender, nationality, origin of birth (personal and parental), marital status, left-to-right political self-placement, occupation, age when they stopped full-time education, household composition, and region of residence.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04667.v2
attitudesicpsrmental healthicpsrmental illnessicpsrpublic healthicpsrpublic opinionicpsrtelecommunicationsicpsrtelephonesicpsrcommunications systemsicpsrEuropean Unionicpsrfoodicpsrfood productionicpsrfood safetyicpsrfood securityicpsrinterneticpsrmental disordersicpsrIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC IV. Environmental DataIDRC VIII. International OrganizationsICPSR XIV.C.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Attitudes Toward Regional Integration, EuropeIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsIDRC V. Health DataPapacostas, AntonisInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4667Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04667.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22840MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22840MiAaIMiAaI
Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS II)
[electronic resource]Milwaukee African American Sample, 2005-2006
Carol Ryff
,
David Almeida
,
John S. Ayanian
,
Deborah S. Carr
,
Paul D. Cleary
,
Christopher Coe
,
Richard Davidson
,
Robert F. Kruger
,
Margie E. Lachman
,
Nadine F. Marks
,
Daniel K. Mroczek
,
Teresa Seeman
,
Marsha Mallick Seltzer
,
Burton H. Singer
,
Richard P. Sloan
,
Patricia A. Tun
,
Maxine Weinstein
,
David Williams
2013-02-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR22840NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
As a refinement to MIDLIFE DEVELOPMENT IN THE UNITED STATES (MIDUS II), 2004-2006 (ICPSR 4652), a sample of African Americans from Milwaukee was included to examine health issues in minority populations. Areas of the city of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, were stratified according to the proportion of the population that were African American. Those areas with high concentrations were sampled at higher rates than areas with lower concentrations. Area probability sampling methods were used along with population counts from the 2000 United States Census to identify potential respondents. Field interviewers screened households to determine if they contained any African American adults. There was additional screening to achieve an appropriate age/gender distribution in a manner similar to what was done for the original MIDUS sample (NATIONAL SURVEY OF MIDLIFE DEVELOPMENT IN THE UNITED STATES (MIDUS), 1995-1996 [ICPSR 2760]). Milwaukee respondents were interviewed in their homes using a Computer Assisted Personal Interview (CAPI) protocol and afterwards asked to complete a Self-Administered Questionnaire (SAQ). All measures paralleled those used in the larger MIDUS I and II samples. After successful completion of the Project 1 survey, some participants were eligible to participate in other MIDUS projects (2 through 5). Survey data was collected for 592 individuals.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22840.v2
adultsicpsrwork attitudesicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrhealth statusicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrlifestylesicpsrmental healthicpsrmidlifeicpsrpsychological wellbeingicpsrsocial indicatorsicpsrAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorRyff, CarolAlmeida, DavidAyanian, John S.Carr, Deborah S.Cleary, Paul D.Coe, ChristopherDavidson, RichardKruger, Robert F.Lachman, Margie E.Marks, Nadine F.Mroczek, Daniel K.Seeman, TeresaSeltzer, Marsha MallickSinger, Burton H.Sloan, Richard P.Tun, Patricia A.Weinstein, MaxineWilliams, DavidInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22840Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22840.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22325MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22325MiAaIMiAaI
Hurricane Katrina Community Advisory Group Study [United States]
[electronic resource]
Ronald C. Kessler
2010-06-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR22325NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
Hurricane Katrina was the most destructive and costliest natural disaster to occur in the United States. Nearly 5 million people lived in the path of Katrina. An additional 1.3 million lived in the New Orleans metropolitan area at the time of the hurricane. Although not in the direct path of Katrina, New Orleans was devastated by a massive flood that occurred as a result. The purpose of this study is to inform policy-makers of the impact of Hurricane Katrina on survivors' physical and mental health and barriers to treatment, as well as assist in future natural disaster planning efforts. This will be achieved by monitoring, over time, a group of people who represent those affected by Katrina. The Hurricane Katrina Community Advisory Group consists of a broad cross-section of people affected by Katrina, including separate samples of people who resided in the New Orleans metropolitan area at the time of the hurricane and those who resided in the counties or parishes of Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi that were in the path of the hurricane. Follow-up interviews conducted with the Advisory Group members to monitor the pace of recovery, as well as reports prepared for policy-makers, press releases, and digitally recorded oral histories are being posted on the Hurricane Katrina Community Advisory Group Web site as they become available. Demographic variables include gender, age, race, ethnicity, pre-hurricane residence (place), pre-hurricane type of housing (detached home, mobile home, apartment, etc.), pre-hurricane employment, family income, marital status, education, home ownership (owned with mortgage, owned without mortgage, rented, etc.), where the respondent lived at time of interview, religious preference, and religiosity.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22325.v2
American Red Crossicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhurricanesicpsrinsuranceicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmental healthicpsrphysical conditionicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrhealth statusicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrproperty insuranceicpsrraceicpsrstressicpsrdisaster relieficpsrsuicideicpsrdisastersicpsremotional statesicpsrFederal Emergency Management AgencyicpsrfloodsicpsrRCMD XI. Poverty and IncomeRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR VII. Geography and EnvironmentKessler, Ronald C.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22325Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22325.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20624MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20624MiAaIMiAaI
Aftercare Services for Juvenile Parolees with Mental Disorders in Ohio, 2005-2006
[electronic resource]
Jack Stevens
2013-12-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR20624NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of the study was to examine the aftercare services juvenile parolees with mental disorders receive as they transition from correctional facilities to the community. The study assessed rates of recidivism for juvenile parolees with mental disorders, the type and frequency of mental health care received in the community by youth on parole, and the relationship between parolees' recidivism and functional outcomes with their utilization of mental health care. The sample came from the Ohio Department of Youth Services (DYS), which covers youths aged 10 to 21 sentenced to correctional care for the 88 Ohio counties in 2005 and 2006. The actual cohort was composed of 175 youths aged 12 to 19 years who had a presumptive release date within the next 60 days and were placed on the mental health caseload. Data were collected in 2005 and 2006 at four time points: one month pre-release, one month post-release, three months post-release, and six months post-release. Variables were gathered from the Ohio DYS and through the administration of a variety of standardized surveys and interview protocols. The main categories of variables include variables relating to arrest history and recidivism, variables relating to the mental health of subjects, variables relating to the administration of mental health treatment and health insurance coverage post-release, and demographic variables.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20624.v1
criminal historiesicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrhealth care accessicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenile recidivistsicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrpostrelease programsicpsrprisoner reentryicpsrrecidivismicpsrrecidivism predictionicpsrrecidivism ratesicpsrrehabilitationicpsrsocial reintegrationicpsryouthful offendersicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD II. Community StudiesNACJD VI. Criminal Justice SystemStevens, JackInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20624Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20624.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03792MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03792MiAaIMiAaI
Social Environment and Biomarkers of Aging Study (SEBAS) in Taiwan, 2000 and 2006
[electronic resource]
Maxine Weinstein
,
Noreen Goldman
,
Ming-Cheng Chang
,
Hui-Sheng Lin
,
Yi-Li Chuang
,
Christine E. Peterson
,
Dana A. Glei
,
Baai-Shyun Hurng
,
Yu-Hsuan Lin
,
Shu-Hui Lin
,
I-Wen Liu
,
Hsia-Yuan Liu
,
Shio-Jean Lin
,
Chun-Ming Wu
,
Mei-Ling Hsiao
,
Shiow-Ing Wu
2014-06-17Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3792NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Social Environment and Biomarkers of Aging Study (SEBAS) in Taiwan, 2000 and 2006, provides information regarding the health and well-being of older persons in Taiwan. Taiwan has undergone rapid demographic, social, and economic changes, becoming a highly urbanized and industrial society with a growing population of persons age 65 or older. SEBAS explores the relationship between life challenges and mental and physical health, the impact of social environment on the health and well-being of the elderly, as well as biological markers of health and stress. The study collected self-reports of physical, psychological, and social well-being, plus extensive clinical data based on medical examinations and laboratory analyses. Examination of health outcomes included chronic illnesses, functional status, psychological well-being, and cognitive function. Questions regarding life challenges focused on perceived stress, economic difficulties, security and safety, and the consequences of a major earthquake. Biological markers were used to identify cardiovascular risk factors, metabolic process measures, immune-system activity, the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis, and sympathetic nervous system activity. Two rounds of biomarker data collected in 2000 and 2006 were complemented by face-to-face interviews with the participants. Demographic and background variables included age, sex, education, ethnicity, occupation, and residency.
Additional information about the Social Environment and Biomarkers of Aging Study can be found at the Georgetown University Center for Populations and Health Web site.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03792.v7
agingicpsrbiomarkersicpsrcognitive functioningicpsrdieticpsrdiseaseicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth statusicpsrillnessicpsrleisureicpsrlife eventsicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmedical evaluationicpsrmedical historyicpsrmedicationsicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrphysical conditionicpsrphysical limitationsicpsrpsychological wellbeingicpsrsocial environmenticpsrstressicpsrurinalysisicpsrDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsNACDA IV. Psychological Characteristics, Mental Health, and Well-Being of Older AdultsDSDR III. Health and MortalityNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsDSDR IX. NIA Supported StudiesICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsWeinstein, MaxineGoldman, NoreenChang, Ming-ChengLin, Hui-ShengChuang, Yi-LiPeterson, Christine E.Glei, Dana A.Hurng, Baai-ShyunLin, Yu-HsuanLin, Shu-HuiLiu, I-WenLiu, Hsia-YuanLin, Shio-JeanWu, Chun-MingHsiao, Mei-LingWu, Shiow-IngInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3792Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03792.v7 nmm 22 4500ICPSR24461MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR24461MiAaIMiAaI
Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D), 2006
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-11-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR24461NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D) is a national census data system of annual discharges from substance abuse treatment facilities. TEDS-D provides annual data on the number and characteristics of persons discharged from public and private substance abuse treatment programs that receive public funding. Data collected both at admission and at discharge is included. The unit of analysis is a treatment discharge. TEDS-D consists of data reported to state substance abuse agencies by the treatment programs, which in turn report it to SAMHSA.
A sister data system, called the Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A), collects data on admissions to substance abuse treatment facilities. The first year of TEDS-A data is 1992, while the first year of TEDS-D is 2006.
TEDS-D variables that are required to be reported are called the "Minimum Data Set (MDS)", while those that are optional are called the "Supplemental Data Set (SuDS)".
Variables unique to TEDS-D, and not part of TEDS-A, are the length of stay, reason for leaving treatment, and service setting at time of discharge. TEDS-D also provides many of the same variables that exist in TEDS-A. This includes information on service setting, number of prior treatments, primary source of referral, gender, race, ethnicity, education, employment status, substance(s) abused, route of administration, frequency of use, age at first use, and whether methadone was prescribed in treatment. Supplemental variables include: diagnosis codes, presence of psychiatric problems, living arrangements, source of income, health insurance, expected source of payment, pregnancy and veteran status, marital status, detailed not in labor force codes, detailed criminal justice referral codes, days waiting to enter treatment, and the number of arrests in the 30 days prior to admissions (starting in 2008) .
Substances abused include alcohol, cocaine and crack, marijuana and hashish, heroin, nonprescription methadone, other opiates and synthetics, PCP, other hallucinogens, methamphetamine, other amphetamines, other stimulants, benzodiazepines, other non-benzodiazepine tranquilizers, barbiturates, other non-barbiturate sedatives or hypnotics, inhalants, over-the-counter medications, and other substances.
Created variables include total number of substances reported, intravenous drug use (IDU), and flags for any mention of specific substances.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24461.v4
alcohol abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrinterventionicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsrSAMHDA III. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS)DSDR III. Health and MortalityICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)24461Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24461.v4 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20681MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20681MiAaIMiAaI
National Health Interview Survey, 2006
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics
2010-08-26Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR20681NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS)
is to obtain information about the amount and distribution of illness,
its effects in terms of disability and chronic impairments, and the
kinds of health services people receive. Implementation of a
redesigned NHIS, consisting of a basic module, a periodic module, and
a topical module, began in 1997 (see NATIONAL HEALTH INTERVIEW SURVEY,
1997 [ICPSR 2954]). The 2006 NHIS contains the Household, Family,
Person, Sample Adult, and Sample Child files from the basic module.
Each record in Part 1, Household Level, contains data on type of
living quarters, number of families in the household responding and
not responding, and the month and year of the interview for each
sampling unit. Part 2, Family Level, is made up of reconstructed
variables from the person-level data of the basic module and includes
information on sex, age, race, marital status, Hispanic origin,
education, veteran status, family income, family size, major
activities, health status, activity limits, and employment status,
along with industry and occupation. As part of the basic module, Part
3, Personl Level, provides information on all family members with
respect to health status, limitation of daily activities, cognitive
impairment, and health conditions. Also included are data on years at
current residence, region variables, height, weight, bed days, doctor
visits, hospital stays, and health care access and utilization. A
randomly-selected adult in each family was interviewed for Part 4,
Sample Adult, regarding respiratory conditions, use of nasal spray,
renal conditions, AIDS, joint symptoms, health status, limitation of
daily activities, and behaviors such as smoking, alcohol consumption,
and physical activity in addition to questions regarding stroke,
diabetes, arthritis, and weight control. Part 5, Sample Child,
provides information from an adult in the household on medical
conditions of one child in the household, such as respiratory
problems, seizures, allergies, and use of special equipment like
hearing aids, braces, or wheelchairs. Also included are variables
regarding child behavior, the use of mental health services, and
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), as well as responses
to the SDQ, the Strengths and Difficulties questionnaire on child
mental health. The 2006 data contain the Child Mental Health Brief
(CMB), Child Mental Health Services (CMS) and Child Influenza
Immunization (CFI) sections. Part 6, Injury/Poison Episode, is an
episode-based file that contains information about the external cause
and nature of the injury or poisoning episode and what the person was
doing at the time of the injury or poisoning episode, in addition to
the date and place of occurrence. Part 7, Injury/Poison Episode
Verbatim, contains edited narrative text descriptions of the injury or
poisoning, provided by the respondent. Imputed income files for 2006
are now available through the
NCHS Web site.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20681.v3
immunizationicpsrinjuriesicpsrmental healthicpsrphysical disabilitiesicpsrpoisoningicpsrchild healthicpsrdisabilitiesicpsrdoctor visitsicpsrfamiliesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth care accessicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrassistive devicesicpsrhealth statusicpsrhospitalizationicpsrhouseholdsicpsrillnessicpsrFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsFENWAY V. Same-Sex Families and CouplesRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingCCEERC II. Parents and FamiliesAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsCCEERC II.D. Parent/Family Practices and StructureFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsCCEERC II.E. Parent/Family CharacteristicsUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20681Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20681.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25504MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25504MiAaIMiAaI
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2005-2006
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics
2012-02-22Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR25504NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
. NHANES has a primary role in this endeavor. In the examination, all participants visit the physician who takes their pulse or blood pressure. Dietary interviews and body measurements are included for everyone. All but the very young have a blood sample taken and see the dentist. Depending upon the age of the participant, the rest of the examination includes tests and procedures to assess the various aspects of health listed above. Usually, the older the individual, the more extensive the examination. Some persons who are unable or unwilling to come to the examination center may be given a less extensive examination in their homes.
Demographic data file variables are grouped into three broad categories: (1) Status Variables: provide core information on the survey participant. Examples of the core variables include interview status, examination status, and sequence number. (Sequence number is a unique ID assigned to each sample person and is required to match the information on this demographic file to the rest of the NHANES 2005-2006 data). (2) Recoded Demographic Variables: these variables include age (age in months for persons through age 19 years, 11 months; age in years for 1- to 84-year-olds, and a top-coded age group of 85 years of age and older), gender, a race/ethnicity variable, current or highest grade of education completed, (less than high school, high school, and more than high school education), country of birth (United States, Mexico, or other foreign born), Poverty Income Ratio (PIR), income, and a pregnancy status variable (adjudicated from various pregnancy related variables). Some of the groupings were made due to limited sample sizes for the two-year dataset. (3) Interview and Examination Sample Weight Variables: sample weights are available for analyzing NHANES 2005-2006 data. For a complete listing of survey contents for all years of the NHANES see the document -- Survey Content -- NHANES 1999-2010.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25504.v5
acculturationicpsragingicpsralcohol consumptionicpsrallergiesicpsranxietyicpsrcardiovascular diseaseicpsrcognitive functioningicpsrconsumer behavioricpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdiabetesicpsrdieticpsrdiseaseicpsrdrug useicpsremotional statesicpsremotional supporticpsrethnicityicpsreyesighticpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth careicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrhealth statusicpsrhearing (physiology)icpsrhospitalizationicpsrillnessicpsrimmunizationicpsrincomeicpsrmalnutritionicpsrmedical evaluationicpsrmental healthicpsrnutritionicpsroccupationsicpsrphysical fitnessicpsrpopulationsicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsrreproductive historyicpsrrespiratory diseasesicpsrrisk factorsicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsleep disordersicpsrsmokingicpsrsocial indicatorsicpsrsocial supporticpsrtreatmenticpsrtuberculosisicpsrvaccinesicpsrDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesDSDR III. Health and MortalityRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNACDA VI. Health Care Needs, Utilization, and Financing for Older AdultsAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25504Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25504.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33661MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33661MiAaIMiAaI
Athletic Involvement Study (of Students in a Northeastern University in the United States), 2006
[electronic resource]
Kathleen Miller
2013-04-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR33661NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Athletic Involvement Study interviewed 795 students in a large public university in the Northeastern United States to explore how or if participation in sports affects people's health-risk behavior. About a quarter of the sample did not report any participation in a sport during high school or college and no primary sport designation. For those who did identify with a sport there were five predictor areas of interest: (1) scales measuring strength of jock identity; (2) strength of athlete identity; (3) goal orientation in sport; (4) primary sport ratings; and (5) conformity to masculine norms.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33661.v1
mental healthicpsrrisk assessmenticpsrsexual behavioricpsrsocial identityicpsrsports participationicpsrsubstance abuseicpsracademic achievementicpsralcoholicpsrathletesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrenergy drinksicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.F. Social Institutions and Behavior, Leisure and RecreationMiller, KathleenInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33661Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33661.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25281MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25281MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS II)
[electronic resource]Cognitive Project, 2004-2006
Carol D. Ryff
,
Margie E. Lachman
2013-04-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR25281NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
In 1994/1995, the MacArthur Midlife Research Network carried out a national survey of over 7,000 Americans aged 25 to 74. The purpose of the study was to investigate the role of behavioral, psychological, and social factors in understanding age-related differences in physical and mental health. A description of the study and findings from it are available at http://www.midus.wisc.edu. With support from the National Institute on Aging, a longitudinal follow-up of the original MIDUS samples (core sample (N = 3,487), metropolitan over-samples (N = 757), twins (N = 957 pairs), and siblings (N = 950)) was conducted in 2004-2006. Guiding hypotheses, at the most general level, were that behavioral and psychosocial factors are consequential for health (physical and mental). The purpose of the Cognitive Project was to determine how cognition is related to overall mental and physical health. Specific goals were: (1) to characterize the nature and range of midlife cognitive performance, relative to those younger and older, across multiple domains in a nationally representative sample (MIDUS); and (2) to examine the relationship between biopsychosocial factors (e.g., SES, health status, health-promoting behaviors, metabolic and cardiovascular biomarkers, depression, personality, control beliefs, stressful life events) and individual differences in cognitive functioning. The development of a cognitive battery for the second wave of testing of the Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS) study provided an opportunity to examine the cognitive performance of young, middle-aged and older adults from a wide range of education levels in a large-scale, national sample. As part of the Cognitive Project of the MIDUS II the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) (Lachman & Tun, 2008; Tun & Lachman, 2006) was administered. More information about the BTACT can be found at www.brandeis.edu/projects/lifespan. The BTACT represents the first comprehensive cognitive battery, including measures of speed and reaction time, to be administered by telephone to a national sample across the adult years and into later life. With a response rate of over 86 percent for the cognitive testing component of the MIDUS II, a cognitive data set of unprecedented range in terms of age, gender, socioeconomic status (SES), education, and geographic diversity was produced.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25281.v5
adultsicpsrcognitionicpsrcognitive functioningicpsrcognitive impairmenticpsrcognitive processesicpsrhealthicpsrhealth statusicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmental healthicpsrphysical heallthicpsrICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsRyff, Carol D.Lachman, Margie E.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25281Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25281.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25181MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25181MiAaIMiAaI
Japanese General Social Survey (JGSS), 2006
[electronic resource]
Ichiro Tanioka
,
Noriko Iwai
,
Michio Nitta
,
Tokio Yasuda
2010-05-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR25181NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This survey was designed to solicit political,
sociological, and economic information from people living in
Japan. The data were collected between October 3 and November 3,
2006, using face-to-face interviews and self-administered
questionnaires. Respondents were asked to give employment information
for themselves and their spouses, including industry, size of
employer, number of hours worked, level of job satisfaction, and time
spent commuting. Respondents were also queried regarding employment
information and education level of their parents when the respondent
was aged 15. Several questions were asked about household composition,
the type of residence, the state of respondents' finances during the
last few years and compared to other Japanese families both past and
present, sources of financial support, the ease of improving one's
standard of living in Japan, and the use of credit cards and consumer
financing. Views were also sought on divorce, the roles of each
spouse, issues involving children, the responsibility of the
government, and taxation issues. In terms of health, questions were
asked regarding the physical and mental health of respondents and
their household members, the frequency of smoking and alcohol
consumption, and their views on genetically modified foods. Quality of
life questions addressed the amount of satisfaction respondents
received from life, and how often they participated in sports,
leisure, and volunteer activities. Additional topics covered were
euthanasia, the use of technology, juvenile delinquency, car ownership
and usage, their level of trust in various institutions, and whether
respondents belonged to religious, trade, or social service
organizations. Demographic variables include age, sex, education
level, employment status, occupation, labor union membership, marital
status, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), household
income, perceived social status, political orientation, political
party affiliation, and religious affiliation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25181.v1
trust (psychology)icpsrwork attitudesicpsrworkplacesicpsrcareer historyicpsrmental healthicpsrnewspapersicpsrsocial statusicpsrtaxesicpsrtechnologyicpsralcohol consumptionicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdivorceicpsrdomestic responsibilitiesicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsreuthanasiaicpsrfamily historyicpsrforeignersicpsrgender rolesicpsrautomobile expensesicpsrgovernmenticpsrcharitable donationsicpsrchildrenicpsrcommuting (travel)icpsrconsumer behavioricpsrcredit card useicpsrhealth statusicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrincomeicpsrjob satisfactionicpsrjuvenile delinquencyicpsrlabor unionsicpsrleisureicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrautomobile useicpsrmarriageicpsrDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorIDRC II. Economic DataICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesTanioka, IchiroIwai, NorikoNitta, MichioYasuda, TokioInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25181Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25181.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21540MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21540MiAaIMiAaI
Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A), 2006
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2014-09-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR21540NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A) is a national census data system of annual admissions to substance abuse treatment facilities. TEDS-A provides annual data on the number and characteristics of persons admitted to public and private substance abuse treatment programs that receive public funding. The unit of analysis is a treatment admission. TEDS consists of data reported to state substance abuse agencies by the treatment programs, which in turn report it to SAMHSA.
A sister data system, called the Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D), collects data on discharges from substance abuse treatment facilities. The first year of TEDS-A data is 1992, while the first year of TEDS-D is 2006.
TEDS variables that are required to be reported are called the "Minimum Data Set (MDS)", while those that are optional are called the "Supplemental Data Set (SuDS)".
Variables in the MDS include: information on service setting, number of prior treatments, primary source of referral, gender, race, ethnicity, education, employment status, substance(s) abused, route of administration, frequency of use, age at first use, and whether methadone was prescribed in treatment. Supplemental variables include: diagnosis codes, presence of psychiatric problems, living arrangements, source of income, health insurance, expected source of payment, pregnancy and veteran status, marital status, detailed not in labor force codes, detailed criminal justice referral codes, days waiting to enter treatment, and the number of arrests in the 30 days prior to admissions (starting in 2008).
Substances abused include alcohol, cocaine and crack, marijuana and hashish, heroin, nonprescription methadone, other opiates and synthetics, PCP, other hallucinogens, methamphetamine, other amphetamines, other stimulants, benzodiazepines, other non-benzodiazepine tranquilizers, barbiturates, other non-barbiturate sedatives or hypnotics, inhalants, over-the-counter medications, and other substances.
Created variables include total number of substances reported, intravenous drug use (IDU), and flags for any mention of specific substances.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21540.v9
drug treatmenticpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrinterventionicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsralcohol abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramSAMHDA III. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS)ICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21540Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21540.v9 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21240MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21240MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2006
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-06-21Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR21240NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series
(formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily
measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United
States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as
annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit
drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households
aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as
lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes:
marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants,
alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including
pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey
covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for
treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be
applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both
substance abuse and mental health related disorders. Respondents were
also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts,
health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record,
problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing.
Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the
2006 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to
17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such
as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends,
social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance
abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes
toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures
focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained
were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of
using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal
behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most
often were introduced with the 1999 survey. Background information
includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational
level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21240.v6
addictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21240Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21240.v6 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04652MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04652MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS II), 2004-2006
[electronic resource]
Carol Ryff
,
David M. Almeida
,
John S. Ayanian
,
Deborah S. Carr
,
Paul D. Cleary
,
Christopher Coe
,
Richard Davidson
,
Robert F. Krueger
,
Marge E. Lachman
,
Nadine F. Marks
,
Daniel K. Mroczek
,
Teresa Seeman
,
Marsha Mailick Seltzer
,
Burton H. Singer
,
Richard P. Sloan
,
Patricia A. Tun
,
Maxine Weinstein
,
David Williams
2012-04-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4652NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
In 1995-1996, the MacArthur Midlife Research Network
carried out a national survey of 7,108 Americans aged 25 to 74
(NATIONAL SURVEY OF MIDLIFE DEVELOPMENT IN THE UNITED STATES (MIDUS),
1995-1996 [ICPSR 2760]). The purpose of the study was to investigate
the role of behavioral, psychological, and social factors in
understanding age-related differences in physical and mental
health. The study was innovative for its broad scientific scope, its
diverse samples (which included twins and the siblings of main sample
respondents), and its creative use of in-depth assessments in key
areas (e.g., daily stress and cognitive functioning). A description of
the study and findings from it are available at
http://www.midus.wisc.edu. With
support from the National Institute on Aging, a longitudinal follow-up
of the original MIDUS samples: core sample (N = 3,485), metropolitan
over-samples (N = 757), twins (N = 998 pairs), and siblings (N = 951),
was conducted in 2004-2006. Guiding hypotheses for it, at the most
general level, were that behavioral and psychosocial factors are
consequential for physical and mental health. MIDUS II respondents were
aged 35 to 86. Data collection largely repeated baseline assessments
(e.g., phone interview and extensive self-administered questionnaire),
with additional questions in selected areas (e.g., cognitive
functioning, optimism and coping, stressful life events, and
caregiving). To add refinements to MIDUS II, an African American sample
(N = 592) was recruited from Milwaukee, Wisconsin, who participated in
a personal interview and completed a questionnaire paralleling the
above assessments. Also administered was a modified form of the mail
questionnaire, via telephone, to respondents who did not complete a
self-administered questionnaire.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04652.v6
adultsicpsrhealth statusicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrlifestylesicpsrmental healthicpsrmidlifeicpsrpsychological wellbeingicpsrrelationshipsicpsrsiblingsicpsrsocial indicatorsicpsrtwinsicpsrwork attitudesicpsrFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsDSDR IX. NIA Supported StudiesDSDR III. Health and MortalityAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsRyff, CarolAlmeida, David M.Ayanian, John S.Carr, Deborah S.Cleary, Paul D.Coe, ChristopherDavidson, RichardKrueger, Robert F.Lachman, Marge E.Marks, Nadine F.Mroczek, Daniel K.Seeman, TeresaSeltzer, Marsha MailickSinger, Burton H.Sloan, Richard P.Tun, Patricia A.Weinstein, MaxineWilliams, DavidInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4652Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04652.v6 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27361MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27361MiAaIMiAaI
New York City Community Health Survey, 2005
[electronic resource]
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
2010-11-17Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR27361NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The New York City Community Health Survey (CHS) is a telephone survey conducted annually by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH). The CHS conducted in 2005 collected information from 9,816 New York adult residents aged 18 years and older from all 5 boroughs of New York City -- Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, Bronx, and Staten Island. All data collected are self-report. Data are available at the level of 33 different neighborhoods, defined by ZIP code. The survey is conducted to inform health program decisions, to increase the understanding of the relationship between health behavior and health status, and to support health policy positions. Respondents were asked about their physical activity participation, body weight, general health, and whether they had ever had a flu shot. Multiple questions addressed respondents' smoking habits, including the age at which they began smoking, the number of cigarettes they smoked per day, where their last cigarette came from, whether they stopped smoking for a period of time, and their current smoking status. Additional information was collected on respondents' colonoscopy, mammogram and pap smear screenings, hypertension diagnosis, and whether respondents' had their cholesterol checked. Other topics covered included respondents' sexual history and contraception preference, whether they had ever been tested for HIV, respondents' alcohol consumption, and whether they had ever experienced domestic violence. Weights were constructed at the UHF-level to allow the sample to provide neighborhood-level estimations of both individual adults and of households in New York City. The data contain a weight variable (WT6) that should be used in analyzing the data. Demographic variables include gender, age, marital status, employment status, race, poverty level, income, and education level.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27361.v1
community healthicpsrdiabetesicpsrdiseaseicpsrexerciseicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth care costsicpsrhealth statusicpsrHIVicpsrillnessicpsrinfluenzaicpsrmammographyicpsrmental healthicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsmokingicpsrsmoking cessationicpsrRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsICPSR II. Community and Urban StudiesRCMD XII. Public OpinionICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNew York City Department of Health and Mental HygieneInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27361Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27361.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04579MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04579MiAaIMiAaI
Exploring Women's Histories of Survival of Violence and Victimization in a Midwestern State, 2004-2005
[electronic resource]
Judy Postmus
,
Margaret Severson
2008-03-26Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR4579NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study explored the histories of physical and sexual
victimization reported by incarcerated and non-incarcerated women. It
sought to identify the survival strategies women activated at various
points in their life span. In Phase One, 424 women were interviewed
from March 2004 to March 2005 on a variety of topics covering
victimization and disclosure experiences and risk and protective
factors. Information from those interviews is contained in Part 1,
Phase One, Interview Data. In Phase Two, 17 women from the prison
and/or the community who had participated in the Phase One interviews
were again interviewed in an effort to provide more depth about their
experiences of victimization and of the resources, social services,
and supports they may have received or not, subsequent to the
victimization(s). Information from these qualitative follow-up
interviews is contained in Parts 2-18. Variables cover topics such as
personal attitudes, health and well-being, relationships with family
and friends, coping with stress, emotional health, alcohol and drug
use, childhood maltreatment, intimate partner violence, sexual
experiences, services and resources received, traumatic experiences,
suicide, resource generating strategies, legal issues, and
demographics.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04579.v1
sexual assaulticpsrsexual behavioricpsrsocial servicesicpsrsuicideicpsrviolence against womenicpsrabuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsrbattered womenicpsrchild abuseicpsrcopingicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdomestic violenceicpsrdrug useicpsremotional abuseicpsrfamily relationsicpsrhealthicpsrincomeicpsrintimate partner violenceicpsrlegal historyicpsrmental healthicpsrsexual abuseicpsrNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD X. VictimizationPostmus, JudySeverson, MargaretInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4579Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04579.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31901MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31901MiAaIMiAaI
Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), 2003-2005
[electronic resource]Visit 07 Dataset
Kim Sutton-Tyrell
,
Faith Selzer
,
MaryFran Sowers
,
Joel Finkelstein
,
Lynda Powell
,
Ellen Gold
,
Gail Greendale
,
Gerson Weiss
,
Karen Matthews
2014-09-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR31901NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), is a multi-site longitudinal, epidemiologic study designed to examine the health of women during their middle years. The study examines the physical, biological, psychological and social changes during this transitional period. The goal of SWAN's research is to help scientists, health care providers and women learn how mid-life experiences affect health and quality of life during aging. Data were collected about doctor visits, medical conditions, medications, treatments, medical procedures, relationships, smoking, and menopause related information such as age at pre-, peri- and post-menopause, self-attitudes, feelings, and common physical problems associated with menopause. The study began in 1995. Between 2003 and 2005, 2,327 of the 3,302 women that joined SWAN were seen for their seventh follow-up visit. The research centers are located in the following communities: Ypsilanti and Inkster, MI (University of Michigan); Boston, MA (Massachusetts General Hospital); Chicago, IL (Rush Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center); Alameda and Contra Costa County, CA (University of California-Davis and Kaiser Permanente); Los Angeles, CA (University of California-Los Angeles); Hackensack, NJ (Hackensack University Medical Center); and Pittsburgh, PA (University of Pittsburgh). SWAN participants represent five racial/ethnic groups and a variety of backgrounds and cultures. Though the New Jersey site was still part of the study, data was not collected from this site for the seventh visit. Demographic and background information includes age, language of interview, marital status, household composition, and employment.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31901.v1
informed consenticpsrreligionicpsrsmokingicpsrstressicpsrAfrican AmericansicpsrAsian Americansicpsrattitudesicpsrbirth controlicpsrbody heighticpsrbody weighticpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdoctor visitsicpsrethnicityicpsrfamily sizeicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrhealth statusicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsrillnessicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmedical evaluationicpsrmedical proceduresicpsrmedicationsicpsrmenopauseicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrquality of lifeicpsrtreatmenticpsrWhite Americansicpsrwomenicpsrwomens health careicpsrworkicpsrNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsNACDA IV. Psychological Characteristics, Mental Health, and Well-Being of Older AdultsICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleSutton-Tyrell, KimSelzer, FaithSowers, MaryFranFinkelstein, JoelPowell, LyndaGold, EllenGreendale, GailWeiss, GersonMatthews, KarenInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31901Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31901.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04606MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2006 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04606MiAaIMiAaI
National Health Interview Survey, 2005
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics
2006-12-21Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2006ICPSR4606NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS)
is to obtain information about the amount and distribution of illness,
its effects in terms of disability and chronic impairments, and the
kinds of health services people receive. Implementation of a
redesigned NHIS, consisting of a basic module, a periodic module, and
a topical module, began in 1997 (see NATIONAL HEALTH INTERVIEW SURVEY,
1997 [ICPSR 2954]). The 2005 NHIS contains the Household, Family,
Person, Sample Adult and Sample Child files from the basic
module. Each record in the Household-level File (Part 1) contains data
on type of living quarters, number of families in the household
responding and not responding, and the month and year of the interview
for each sampling unit. The Family-level File (Part 2) is made up of
reconstructed variables from the person-level data of the basic module
and includes information on sex, age, race, marital status, Hispanic
origin, education, veteran status, family income, family size, major
activities, health status, activity limits, and employment status,
along with industry and occupation. As part of the basic module, the
Person-level File (Part 3) provides information on all family members
with respect to health status, limitation of daily activities,
cognitive impairment, and health conditions. Also included are data on
years at current residence, region variables, height, weight, bed
days, doctor visits, hospital stays, and health care access and
utilization. A randomly-selected adult in each family was interviewed
for the Sample Adult File (Part 4) regarding respiratory conditions,
use of nasal spray, renal conditions, AIDS, joint symptoms, health
status, limitation of daily activities, and behaviors such as smoking,
alcohol consumption, and physical activity. The Sample Child File
(Part 5) provides information from an adult in the household on
medical conditions of one child in the household, such as respiratory
problems, seizures, allergies, and use of special equipment like
hearing aids, braces, or wheelchairs. Also included are variables
regarding child behavior, the use of mental health services, and
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) as well as responses
to the SDQ-EX, which is the extended version of the Strengths and
Difficulties questionnaire on child mental health. The 2005 data
contain the Child Mental Health Brief (CMB), Child Mental Health
Services (CMS) and Child Influenza Immunization (CFI) sections. The
Injury/Poison Episode File (Part 6) is an episode-based file that
contains information about the external cause and nature of the injury
or poisoning episode and what the person was doing at the time of the
injury or poisoning episode, in addition to the date and place of
occurrence. The Injury/Poison Episode Verbatim File (Part 7) contains
edited narrative text descriptions of the injury or poisoning,
provided by the respondent. The Sample Adult Cancer File (Part 8) has
been added in 2005 and examines diet and nutrition, physical activity,
tobacco use, cancer screening, genetic testing, and family history.
Imputed income files for 2005 are now available through the NCHS Web
site at www.cdc.gov/nhis.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04606.v1
assistive devicesicpsrchild healthicpsrdisabilitiesicpsrdoctor visitsicpsrfamiliesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth care accessicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrhealth statusicpsrhospitalizationicpsrhouseholdsicpsrillnessicpsrimmunizationicpsrinjuriesicpsrmental healthicpsrphysical disabilitiesicpsrpoisoningicpsrCCEERC II.E. Parent/Family CharacteristicsICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesCCEERC II. Parents and FamiliesCCEERC II.D. Parent/Family Practices and StructureFENWAY V. Same-Sex Families and CouplesFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4606Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04606.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR26681MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR26681MiAaIMiAaI
CRELES
[electronic resource]Costa Rican Longevity and Healthy Aging Study, 2005 (Costa Rica Estudio de Longevidad y Envejecimiento Saludable)
Luis Rosero-Bixby
,
Xinia Fernández
,
William H. Dow
2013-02-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR26681NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Costa Rican Longevity and Healthy Aging Study (CRELES, or Costa Rica Estudio de Longevidad y Envejecimiento Saludable) is a nationally representative longitudinal survey of health and lifecourse experiences of 2,827 Costa Ricans ages 60 and over in 2005. Baseline household interviews were conducted between November 2004 and September 2006, with two-year follow-up interviews. The sample was drawn from Costa Rican residents in the 2000 population census who were born in 1945 or before, with an over-sample of the oldest-old (ages 95 and over). The main study objective was to determine the length and quality of life, and its contributing factors in the elderly of Costa Rica. Vital statistics indicate that Costa Rica has an unusually high life expectancy for a middle-income country, even higher than that of the United States, but CRELES is the first nationally representative survey to investigate adult health levels in Costa Rica. CRELES public use data files contain information on a broad range of topics including self-reported physical health, psychological health, living conditions, health behaviors, health care utilization, social support, and socioeconomic status. Objective health indicators include anthropometrics, observed mobility, and biomarkers from fasting blood and overnight urine collection (such as cholesterol, glycosylated hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, cortisol, and other components of integrative allostatic load measures). Mortality events are tracked and conditions surrounding death are measured in a surviving family interview (longitudinal follow-up data are not yet publicly available).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26681.v2
agingicpsrolder adultsicpsrphysical conditionicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrsocial networksicpsrsocial supporticpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrlife expectancyicpsrliving conditionsicpsrmental healthicpsrmortality ratesicpsrNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsICPSR XVII.C.2. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, Nations Other Than the United StatesDSDR III. Health and MortalityNACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older AdultsDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsRosero-Bixby, LuisFernández, XiniaDow, William H.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)26681Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26681.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25041MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25041MiAaIMiAaI
Hispanic Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Study of the Elderly (HEPESE) Wave 5, 2004-2005 [Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas]
[electronic resource]
Kyriakos S. Markides
,
Laura A. Ray
,
Ronald Angel
,
David V. Espino
2009-09-23Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR25041NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This dataset comprises the fourth follow-up of the baseline
Hispanic EPESE (HISPANIC ESTABLISHED POPULATIONS FOR THE EPIDEMIOLOGIC
STUDIES OF THE ELDERLY, 1993-1994: [ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA, COLORADO, NEW
MEXICO, AND TEXAS] [ICPSR 2851]). The baseline Hispanic EPESE collected data on a representative sample of community-dwelling Mexican-Americans, aged 65 years and older, residing in the five southwestern states of Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas. The primary purpose of the series was to provide estimates of the prevalence of key physical health conditions, mental health conditions, and functional impairments in older Mexican Americans and to compare these estimates with those for other populations. The Hispanic EPESE provides data on risk factors for mortality and morbidity in Mexican Americans in order to contrast how these factors operate differently in non-Hispanic White Americans, African Americans, and other major ethnic groups. The public-use data cover demographic characteristics (age, sex, type of Hispanic race, income, education, marital status, number of children, employment, and religion), height, weight, social and physical functioning, chronic conditions, related health problems, health habits, self-reported use of dental, hospital, and nursing home services, and depression. Subsequent follow-ups provide a cross-sectional examination of the predictors of mortality, changes in health outcomes, and institutionalization, and other changes in living arrangements, as well as changes in life situations and quality of life issues.
During this 5th Wave, 2004-2005, reinterviews were conducted either in person or by proxy, with 1,167 of the original respondents. This 4th follow-up includes an additional sample of 902 Mexican Americans aged 75 and over with higher average-levels of education than those of the surviving cohort, increasing the total number of respondents to 2,069. By Diversifying the 75 and older cohort a better understanding of the influence of socioeconomic and cultural variations on the lives and health older Mexican Americans can be gained.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25041.v1
demographic characteristicsicpsrMexican Americansicpsrmortality ratesicpsrolder adultsicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrquality of lifeicpsrethnicityicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth statusicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsrlife expectancyicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmental healthicpsrDSDR III. Health and MortalityAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsDSDR IX. NIA Supported StudiesRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingRCMD IX.E. LatinoNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsMarkides, Kyriakos S.Ray, Laura A.Angel, RonaldEspino, David V.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25041Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25041.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33242MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33242MiAaIMiAaI
HIV Stigma in a Population of Adults Age 50 and Over in the Pacific Northwest, 2003-2005
[electronic resource]
Charles A. Emlet
2013-03-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR33242NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Older adults are increasingly becoming impacted by HIV disease, both as newly infected individuals and as long-term survivors of HIV/AIDS living into older age. HIV-related stigma impacts the quality of life of all persons with HIV/AIDS. However, little is known about HIV-related stigma in older adults because many studies do not include older subjects or ignore age as a variable. This mixed methods study examined the experiences of HIV-related stigma in a sample of 25 older adults with HIV/AIDS from the Pacific Northwest. Quantitative methods measured HIV stigma and depression, while in-depth qualitative interviews captured the lived experiences of these individuals. Stigma was positively and significantly correlated with depression and stigma was found to be significantly higher in African American, as compared to White informants. Qualitative interviews yielded 11 themes that correspond to the four categories constructed in the stigma instrument. Rejection, disclosure concerns, stereotyping, protective silence and feeling "other", were all common experiences of these individuals.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33242.v1
agingicpsrAIDSicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrHIVicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrsocial distanceicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACDA IV. Psychological Characteristics, Mental Health, and Well-Being of Older AdultsICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesEmlet, Charles A.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33242Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33242.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04703MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04703MiAaIMiAaI
Japanese General Social Survey (JGSS), 2005
[electronic resource]
Ichiro Tanioka
,
Michio Nitta
,
Noriko Iwai
,
Tokio Yasuda
2007-08-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4703NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This survey was designed to solicit political,
sociological, and economic information from people living in
Japan. The data were collected between August 25 and November 23,
2005, using face-to-face interviews and self-administered
questionnaires. Respondents were asked to give employment information
for themselves and their spouses, including industry, size of
employer, number of hours worked, level of job satisfaction, and time
spent commuting. Respondents were also queried regarding employment
information and education level of their parents when the respondent
was aged 15. Several questions were asked about household composition,
the type of residence, the state of respondents' finances during the
last few years and compared to other Japanese families both past and
present, sources of financial support, the ease of improving one's
standard of living in Japan, and the use of credit cards and consumer
financing. Views were also sought on divorce, the roles of each
spouse, issues involving children, the responsibility of the
government, and taxation issues. In terms of health, questions were
asked regarding the physical and mental health of respondents and
their household members, the frequency of smoking and alcohol
consumption, and their views on genetically modified foods. Quality of
life questions addressed the amount of satisfaction respondents
received from life, and how often they participated in sports,
leisure, and volunteer activities. Additional topics covered were
euthanasia, the use of technology, juvenile delinquency, car ownership
and usage, their level of trust in various institutions, and whether
respondents belonged to religious, trade, or social service
organizations. Demographic variables include age, sex, education
level, employment status, occupation, labor union membership, marital
status, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), household
income, perceived social status, political orientation, political
party affiliation, and religious affiliation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04703.v1
alcohol consumptionicpsrautomobile expensesicpsrautomobile useicpsrcareer historyicpsrcharitable donationsicpsrchildrenicpsrcommuting (travel)icpsrcredit card useicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdivorceicpsrdomestic responsibilitiesicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsreuthanasiaicpsrfamily historyicpsrforeignersicpsrgender rolesicpsrgovernmenticpsrhealth statusicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrincomeicpsrjob satisfactionicpsrlabor unionsicpsrleisureicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrconsumer behavioricpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmarriageicpsrmental healthicpsrnewspapersicpsrsocial statusicpsrtaxesicpsrtechnologyicpsrtrust (psychology)icpsrwork attitudesicpsrworkplacesicpsrIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsIDRC II. Economic DataIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesTanioka, IchiroNitta, MichioIwai, NorikoYasuda, TokioInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4703Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04703.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20358MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20358MiAaIMiAaI
Integrated Approaches to Manage Multi-Case Families in the Criminal Justice System in Maricopa County, Arizona, and Deschutes and Jackson Counties, Oregon, 1999-2005
[electronic resource]
Nancy Thoennes
2009-07-31Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR20358NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The project goal was to collect data on approximately 100 Unified Family Court (UFC) cases at each of the three selected jurisdictions -- Maricopa County, Arizona, Deschutes County, Oregon, and Jackson County, Oregon -- that have developed systems to address the special needs of families with multiple court cases. The purpose of the study was to examine research questions related to: (1) dependency case processing and outcomes, (2) delinquency case processing and outcomes, (3) domestic relations/probate case processing and outcomes, and (4) criminal case processing and outcomes. The data used in this study were generated from a review of the court records of 602 families including 406 families served by the UFC as well as comparison groups of 196 non-UFC multi-case families. During the study's planning phase, an instrument was drafted for use in extracting this information. Data collectors were recruited from former UFC staff and current and former non-UFC court staff. All data collectors were trained by the principal investigator in the use of the data collection form. The vast majority of all data extraction required a manual review of paper files. Variables in this dataset are organized into the following categories: background variables, items from dependency/abuse and neglect filings, delinquency filings, domestic relations/probate filings, civil domestic violence/protection order filings, criminal domestic violence filings, criminal child abuse filings, other criminal filings, and variables from a summary across cases.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20358.v1
alcohol abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrfamily courtsicpsrfamily historiesicpsrfamily servicesicpsrfamily violenceicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrrestraining ordersicpsrsexual abuseicpsrsexual behavioricpsrchild abuseicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtruancyicpsrviolent behavioricpsrchild custodyicpsrchild neglecticpsrchild welfareicpsrcourtsicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrdomestic relationsicpsrdomestic violenceicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingThoennes, NancyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20358Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20358.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04626MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04626MiAaIMiAaI
Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A), 2005
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2014-09-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4626NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Treatment Episode Data Set -- Admissions (TEDS-A) is a national census data system of annual admissions to substance abuse treatment facilities. TEDS-A provides annual data on the number and characteristics of persons admitted to public and private substance abuse treatment programs that receive public funding. The unit of analysis is a treatment admission. TEDS consists of data reported to state substance abuse agencies by the treatment programs, which in turn report it to SAMHSA.
A sister data system, called the Treatment Episode Data Set -- Discharges (TEDS-D), collects data on discharges from substance abuse treatment facilities. The first year of TEDS-A data is 1992, while the first year of TEDS-D is 2006.
TEDS variables that are required to be reported are called the "Minimum Data Set (MDS)", while those that are optional are called the "Supplemental Data Set (SuDS)".
Variables in the MDS include: information on service setting, number of prior treatments, primary source of referral, gender, race, ethnicity, education, employment status, substance(s) abused, route of administration, frequency of use, age at first use, and whether methadone was prescribed in treatment. Supplemental variables include: diagnosis codes, presence of psychiatric problems, living arrangements, source of income, health insurance, expected source of payment, pregnancy and veteran status, marital status, detailed not in labor force codes, detailed criminal justice referral codes, days waiting to enter treatment, and the number of arrests in the 30 days prior to admissions (starting in 2008).
Substances abused include alcohol, cocaine and crack, marijuana and hashish, heroin, nonprescription methadone, other opiates and synthetics, PCP, other hallucinogens, methamphetamine, other amphetamines, other stimulants, benzodiazepines, other non-benzodiazepine tranquilizers, barbiturates, other non-barbiturate sedatives or hypnotics, inhalants, over-the-counter medications, and other substances.
Created variables include total number of substances reported, intravenous drug use (IDU), and flags for any mention of specific substances.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04626.v10
alcohol abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrinterventionicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramSAMHDA III. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS)ICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4626Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04626.v10 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04596MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2006 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04596MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2005
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-06-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2006ICPSR4596NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series
(formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily
measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United
States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as
annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit
drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households
aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as
lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes:
marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants,
alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including
pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey
covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for
treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be
applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both
substance abuse and mental health related disorders. Respondents were
also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts,
health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record,
problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing.
Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the
2005 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to
17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such
as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends,
social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance
abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes
toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures
focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained
were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of
using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal
behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most
often were introduced with the 1999 survey. Background information
includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational
level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04596.v4
addictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD I. CrimeNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4596Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04596.v4 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31421MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31421MiAaIMiAaI
New York City Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NYC HANES), 2004
[electronic resource]
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
,
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics
2011-11-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR31421NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, with support from the National Center for Health Statistics, conducted the New York City Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NYC HANES) to improve disease surveillance and establish citywide estimates for several previously unmeasured health conditions from which reduction targets could be set and incorporated into health policy planning initiatives. NYC HANES also provides important new information about the prevalence and control of chronic disease precursors, such as undiagnosed hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and impaired fasting glucose, which allow chronic disease programs to monitor more proximate health events and rapidly evaluate primary intervention efforts. Study findings are used by the public health community in New York City, as well as by researchers and clinicians, to better target resources to the health needs of the population. The NYC HANES data consist of the following six datasets: (1) Study Participant File (SPfile), (2) Computer-Assisted Personal Interview (CAPI), (3) Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interview (ACASI), (4) Composite International Diagnostic Interview(CIDI), (5) Examination Component, and (6) Laboratory Component. The Study Participant File contains variables necessary for all analyses, therefore, when using the other datasets, they should be merged to this file. Variable P_ID is the unique identifier used to merge all datasets. Merging information from multiple NYC HANES datasets using SP_ID ensures that the appropriate information for each SP is linked correctly. (SAS datasets must be sorted by SP_ID prior to merging.) Please note that NYC HANES datasets may not have the same number of records for each component because some participants did not complete each component. Demographic variables include race/ethnicity, Hispanic origin, age, body weight, gender, education level, marital status, and country of birth.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31421.v1
acculturationicpsragingicpsralcohol consumptionicpsrallergiesicpsranxietyicpsrcardiovascular diseaseicpsrcognitive functioningicpsrconsumer behavioricpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdiabetesicpsrdieticpsrdiseaseicpsrdrug useicpsremotional statesicpsremotional supporticpsrethnicityicpsreyesighticpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth careicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrhealth statusicpsrhearing (physiology)icpsrhospitalizationicpsrillnessicpsrimmunizationicpsrincomeicpsrmalnutritionicpsrmedical evaluationicpsrmental healthicpsrnutritionicpsroccupationsicpsrphysical fitnessicpsrpopulationsicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsrreproductive historyicpsrrespiratory diseasesicpsrrisk factorsicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsleep disordersicpsrsmokingicpsrsocial indicatorsicpsrsocial supporticpsrtreatmenticpsrtuberculosisicpsrvaccinesicpsrICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingDSDR III. Health and MortalityFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsNACDA VI. Health Care Needs, Utilization, and Financing for Older AdultsNew York City Department of Health and Mental HygieneUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31421Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31421.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31181MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31181MiAaIMiAaI
Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), 2002-2004
[electronic resource]Visit 06 Dataset
Kim Sutton-Tyrell
,
Faith Selzer
,
MaryFran Sowers
,
Joel Finkelstein
,
Lynda Powell
,
Ellen Gold
,
Gail Greendale
,
Gerson Weiss
,
Karen Matthews
2014-09-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR31181NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), is a multi-site longitudinal, epidemiologic study designed to examine the health of women during their middle years. The study examines the physical, biological, psychological and social changes during this transitional period. The goal of SWAN's research is to help scientists, health care providers and women learn how mid-life experiences affect health and quality of life during aging. Data were collected about doctor visits, medical conditions, medications, treatments, medical procedures, relationships, smoking, and menopause related information such as age at pre-, peri- and post-menopause, self-attitudes, feelings, and common physical problems associated with menopause. The study began in 1995. Between 2002 and 2004, 2,448 of the 3,302 women that joined SWAN were seen for their sixth follow-up visit. The research centers are located in the following communities: Ypsilanti and Inkster, MI (University of Michigan); Boston, MA (Massachusetts General Hospital); Chicago, IL (Rush Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center); Alameda and Contra Costa County, CA (University of California-Davis and Kaiser Permanente); Los Angeles, CA (University of California-Los Angeles); Hackensack, NJ (Hackensack University Medical Center); and Pittsburgh, PA (University of Pittsburgh). SWAN participants represent five racial/ethnic groups and a variety of backgrounds and cultures. Demographic and background information includes age, language of interview, marital status, household composition, and employment.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31181.v1
birth controlicpsrbody heighticpsrbody weighticpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdoctor visitsicpsrethnicityicpsrfamily sizeicpsrAfrican AmericansicpsrAsian Americansicpsrattitudesicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrhealth statusicpsrmedicationsicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsrillnessicpsrinformed consenticpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmedical evaluationicpsrmedical proceduresicpsrmenopauseicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrquality of lifeicpsrreligionicpsrsmokingicpsrstressicpsrtreatmenticpsrWhite Americansicpsrwomenicpsrwomens health careicpsrworkicpsrRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsNACDA IV. Psychological Characteristics, Mental Health, and Well-Being of Older AdultsNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsSutton-Tyrell, KimSelzer, FaithSowers, MaryFranFinkelstein, JoelPowell, LyndaGold, EllenGreendale, GailWeiss, GersonMatthews, KarenInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31181Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31181.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04114MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04114MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of the Bureau of Justice Assistance Mental Health Court Initiative at Seven Sites in the United States, 2003-2004
[electronic resource]
Henry J. Steadman
2005-03-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR4114NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study evaluated seven mental health courts that were
partially funded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. Data were
collected on 285 formal referrals to the seven courts between November
1, 2003, and January 31, 2004. For every referral, court staff completed
a one-page questionnaire that covered (1) identification of the
referring agent, (2) characteristics of the referred person, including
age, gender, race, criminal charges, and type of mental disorder, and
(3) the disposition decision.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04114.v1
courtsicpsrmental disordersicpsrmental healthicpsrNACJD V. CourtsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemSteadman, Henry J.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4114Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04114.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21942MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21942MiAaIMiAaI
NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development
[electronic resource]Phase III, 2000-2004 [United States]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
2014-11-21Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR21942NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
type="2">Day One Part II
(http://lecb.physics.lsa.umich.edu/CWIS/browser.php?ResourceId=1632)
Family Data - Margaret Owen
Orientation to using the Data and Documentation - Bonnie Knoke
Day One Part III
(http://lecb.physics.lsa.umich.edu/CWIS/browser.php?ResourceId=1633)
Data Documentation: Hands-on Training - Bonnie Knoke
Day One Part IV
(http://lecb.physics.lsa.umich.edu/CWIS/browser.php?ResourceId=1634)
Data Orientation: Merging Data Files - Robert Corwyn
Child Care Data - Margaret Owen
Day One Part V
(http://lecb.physics.lsa.umich.edu/CWIS/browser.php?ResourceId=1635)
Secondary Data Analysis - Peg Burchinal
Day One Part VI
(http://lecb.physics.lsa.umich.edu/CWIS/browser.php?ResourceId=1636)
NICHD Funding Opportunities - James Griffin
Day Two Part I
(http://lecb.physics.lsa.umich.edu/CWIS/browser.php?ResourceId=1637)
Social Data - Martha Cox
Peer Data - Martha Cox
Cognitive Data - Dan Keating
Day Two Part II
(http://lecb.physics.lsa.umich.edu/CWIS/browser.php?ResourceId=1638)
School Data - Renate Houts
Out-of-school Data - Bob Bradley
Health Data - Bob Bradley
Day Two Part III
(http://lecb.physics.lsa.umich.edu/CWIS/browser.php?ResourceId=1639)
Stats Presentation: Control Variables - Renate Houts
Day Three
(http://lecb.physics.lsa.umich.edu/CWIS/browser.php?ResourceId=1640)
Analytic Strategies - Renate Houts and Peg Burchinal
Data are available for the other phases of the NICHD STUDY OF EARLY CHILD CARE AND YOUTH DEVELOPMENT (SECCYD). See: SECCYD Phase II, 1996-1999 (ICPSR 21941), SECCYD Phase III, 2000-2004 (ICPSR 21942), SECCYD Phase IV, 2005-2008 (ICPSR 22361).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21942.v1
behavior problemsicpsrcensus dataicpsrchild careicpsrchild developmenticpsrchildrenicpsrcognitionicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsremotional developmenticpsremploymenticpsrfamiliesicpsrfathersicpsrhome environmenticpsrinfantsicpsrlanguageicpsrloveicpsrmarital relationsicpsrmental healthicpsrmothersicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrparental influenceicpsrparentsicpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial supporticpsrtoddlersicpsrDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United StatesCCEERC XII. Parent, School, and Community School Readiness/Child School Success and PerformanceDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsCCEERC I.B. Child Development and School ReadinessCCEERC XII.C. School Performance and SuccessCCEERC I. Children and Child DevelopmentUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21942Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21942.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04349MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04349MiAaIMiAaI
National Health Interview Survey, 2004
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics
2006-05-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR4349NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS)
is to obtain information about the amount and distribution of illness,
its effects in terms of disability and chronic impairments, and the
kinds of health services people receive. Implementation of a
redesigned NHIS, consisting of a basic module, a periodic module, and
a topical module, began in 1997 (see NATIONAL HEALTH INTERVIEW SURVEY,
1997 [ICPSR 2954]). The 2004 NHIS contains the Household, Family,
Person, Sample Adult and Sample Child files from the basic
module. Each record in the Household-level File (Part 1) contains data
on type of living quarters, number of families in the household
responding and not responding, and the month and year of the interview
for each sampling unit. The Family-level File (Part 2) is made up of
reconstructed variables from the person-level data of the basic module
and includes information on sex, age, race, marital status, Hispanic
origin, education, veteran status, family income, family size, major
activities, health status, activity limits, and employment status,
along with industry and occupation. As part of the basic module, the
Person-level File (Part 3) provides information on all family members
with respect to health status, limitation of daily activities,
cognitive impairment, and health conditions. Also included are data on
years at current residence, region variables, height, weight, bed
days, doctor visits, hospital stays, and health care access and
utilization. A randomly-selected adult in each family was interviewed
for the Sample Adult File (Part 4) regarding respiratory conditions,
use of nasal spray, renal conditions, AIDS, joint symptoms, health
status, limitation of daily activities, and behaviors such as smoking,
alcohol consumption, and physical activity. The Sample Child File
(Part 5) provides information from an adult in the household on
medical conditions of one child in the household, such as respiratory
problems, seizures, allergies, and use of special equipment like
hearing aids, braces, or wheelchairs. Also included are variables
regarding child behavior, the use of mental health services, and
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) as well as responses
to the SDQ-EX, which is the extended version of Strengths and
Difficulties questionnaire on child mental health. Several changes
have occurred in the 2004 NHIS. The Child Immunization Section (CIM)
has been dropped. Also new in 2004, questionnaires have been provided
in both English and Spanish. The Injury/Poison Episode File (Part 6)
is an episode-based file that contains information about the external
cause and nature of the injury or poisoning episode and what the
person was doing at the time of the injury or poisoning episode, in
addition to the date and place of occurrence. The Injury/Poison
Episode Verbatim File (Part 7) contains edited narrative text
descriptions of the injury or poisoning provided by the
respondent. Imputed income files for 2004 are now available through
the NCHS Web site at www.cdc.gov/nhis.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04349.v2
assistive devicesicpsrchild healthicpsrdisabilitiesicpsrdoctor visitsicpsrfamiliesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth care accessicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrhealth statusicpsrhospitalizationicpsrhouseholdsicpsrillnessicpsrimmunizationicpsrinjuriesicpsrmental healthicpsrphysical disabilitiesicpsrpoisoningicpsrFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsFENWAY V. Same-Sex Families and CouplesCCEERC II. Parents and FamiliesAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsCCEERC II.E. Parent/Family CharacteristicsICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesCCEERC II.D. Parent/Family Practices and StructureUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4349Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04349.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04297MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04297MiAaIMiAaI
Survey of Texas Adults, 2004
[electronic resource]
Marc A. Musick
2005-09-22Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR4297NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This dataset is the first in a series of several data
collection efforts aimed at learning more about the lives of adults
who live in Texas. Data collected in 2004 contains information on
seven major aspects of Texas life: (1) A series of questions on civic
engagement and attitudes, such as voting behavior, jury service, and
attitudes towards the institution of the jury. (2) A large module of
questions related to volunteering. Inquiry was made on how and how
much respondents volunteer, their reasons for volunteering, and the
ways they go about finding opportunities to do so. This module also
asks about organizational memberships and giving behaviors. (3)
Personality dispositions and attitudes related to violence and other
issues. (4) Physical and mental health status. (5) Information
regarding health behaviors, such as diet and exercise, and the
frequency in which respondents regularly engage in various activities.
(6) Questions related to religious activities and beliefs held by
respondents. (7) General demographic information, including age, sex,
race, type of Hispanic descent, education, employment and
citizenship.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04297.v1
membershipsicpsrmental healthicpsrpersonalityicpsrphysical conditionicpsrphysical fitnessicpsrreligionicpsrvolunteersicpsrcharitable donationsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth statusicpsrNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United StatesMusick, Marc A.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4297Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04297.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04354MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2006 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04354MiAaIMiAaI
Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health (REACH II), 2001-2004
[electronic resource]
Richard Schulz
,
Louis Burgio
,
Alan B. Stevens
,
Robert Burns
,
Sara Czaja
,
Dolores Gallagher Thompson
,
Laura N. Gitlin
,
Steven Belle
,
Linda Nichols
2006-10-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2006ICPSR4354NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Built upon the findings of RESOURCES FOR ENHANCING
ALZHEIMER'S CAREGIVER HEALTH, 1996-2001, BASELINE AND FOLLOW-UP DATA
[ICPSR 3678], REACH II designed and tested a single multi-component
intervention among family caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's
disease or related disorders. The overall objectives were (1) to
identify and reduce modifiable risk factors among diverse family
caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's Disease or a related disorder,
(2) to enhance the quality of care provided to the care recipients,
and (3) to enhance the well-being of the caregivers. REACH II is the
first project to simultaneously test a comprehensive caregiver
intervention in three distinct racial/ethnic groups: Hispanic/Latino,
Black/African-American, and White/Caucasian. The intervention was
based on a risk-appraisal approach in which five areas of
risk--depression, burden, self-care, social support, and patient
problem behaviors--that are central to caregiver well-being and
quality of life were matched to corresponding intervention
components. These components included education, skills to manage
troublesome care-recipient behaviors, social support, cognitive
strategies for reframing negative emotional responses, and strategies
for enhancing healthy behaviors and managing stress. Consistent with
this approach, the primary outcome was a multivariate quality of life
indicator that assessed caregiver depression, burden, self-care,
social support, and patient problem behaviors. Two hallmarks of
caregiver intervention studies--caregiver clinical depression and
patient institutionalization--were assessed as secondary outcomes. The
dataset names listed in this collection include the shortened name of
the form administered.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04354.v1
Alzheimers diseaseicpsrcaregiver burdenicpsrcaregiversicpsrdementiaicpsremotional statesicpsrfamiliesicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrhealth statusicpsrhome health careicpsrinterventionicpsrmental disordersicpsrmental healthicpsrminoritiesicpsrolder adultsicpsroutreach programsicpsrpsychological wellbeingicpsrstressicpsrAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNACDA IV. Psychological Characteristics, Mental Health, and Well-Being of Older AdultsICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleDSDR IX. NIA Supported StudiesSchulz, RichardBurgio, LouisStevens, Alan B.Burns, RobertCzaja, SaraGallagher Thompson, DoloresGitlin, Laura N.Belle, StevenNichols, LindaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4354Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04354.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29582MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29582MiAaIMiAaI
Marriage Matters Panel Survey of Newlywed Couples, 1998-2004, Louisiana
[electronic resource]
Steven L. Nock
,
Laura A. Sanchez
,
James D. Wright
2012-06-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR29582NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
In 1997, Louisiana enacted a covenant marriage law which gave couples an alternative to a conventional marriage license. By requiring premarital counseling and proof of fault for a subsequent divorce, along with other features, covenant marriages were intended to be more difficult both to enter and to exit. The Marriage Matters panel survey was designed to examine the effects of covenant marriage on rates of marital dissolution, relationship quality, and other outcomes. The data were collected in three waves. Wave 1 was collected approximately 3 to 6 months after marriage. Respondents were asked questions about their recent marriage, the time leading up to their recent marriage, premarital counseling, convenant marriage, previous marriages, biological and adopted children, feelings about children, their views on marriage and divorce in general, their religious views, satisfaction in marriage, household responsibilities, their background, health and happiness, their social and political views, and about the questionnaire itself. Wave 2 was administered approximately 18 months after the first wave. The second wave queried respondents on their marriage today, their views on marriage and divorce in general, their religious views, household responsibilities, satisfaction in marriage, convenant marriage, biological and adopted children, feelings about children, problems in their marriage, advice and counseling, their health and happiness, employment, housing, and income, household composition, and their social and political views. Wave 3 was administered 12 to 24 months after the second wave. Respondents answered questions on their marriage today, views about marriage and divorce in general, their religious views, household responsibilities, satisfaction in marriage, the celebration of holidays, convenant marriage, biological and adopted children, feelings about children, problems in their marriage, advice and counseling, their health and happiness, employment, housing, and income, household composition, and their social and political views. In the divorce questionnaire, the following topics were addressed: how things stand at the moment, feelings about their marriage, arguments during their marriage, social life since the separation or divorce, their health and well-being, moving to a divorce agreement, advice and counseling, the divorce process and convenant marriage, and household income the year before and after the separation. Demographic information collected across all three waves includes: age, gender, religious participation, employment status, education level, number of children birthed or adopted, household composition, and household income. Demographic information collected in Wave 1 only includes: race, religious affiliation, number of previous marriages, and political affiliation. Demographic information collected through the divorce questionnaire includes: gender, marital status, and personal and partner income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29582.v1
adulteryicpsrchildrenicpsr