If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Barrack, Barrack he's our man
If he can't do it ....... then America wins

Who's side you on anyway?
Closely related to this is the Rights celebration over the United States being rejected for the 2016 Olympics. I mean what possible harm could have happened if we had gotten the Olympics? Maybe a feather in the President's cap? Is that what your afraid of ? It is just hard for me to believe that a rational person would be against this.

Who's side you on anyway?
Closely related to this is the Rights celebration over the United States being rejected for the 2016 Olympics. I mean what possible harm could have happened if we had gotten the Olympics? Maybe a feather in the President's cap? Is that what your afraid of ? It is just hard for me to believe that a rational person would be against this.

Did you see the tape of Rush's celebration? He was delirious with joy.

These guys don't love America. They hate it.

"For everyone to whom much is given, of him shall much be required." -- Luke 12:48

Who's side you on anyway?
Closely related to this is the Rights celebration over the United States being rejected for the 2016 Olympics. I mean what possible harm could have happened if we had gotten the Olympics? Maybe a feather in the President's cap? Is that what your afraid of ? It is just hard for me to believe that a rational person would be against this.

Other than the graft, corruption, overcharging for product, crippleing of an American city while it is going on, the cost of such a thing, I can think of just several hundred more reasons not to have it. None of my reasons are partisan or political in nature.

subroc

Article [I.]
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Article [II.]
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

... I mean what possible harm could have happened if we had gotten the Olympics?...

Did you see the current estimates for London in 2012? They originally were for 4.8 billion but have now grown to 18 billion. The Chicago official estimate was less than 5 billion. With the Chicago propensity to add graft to any legitimate bill, 25-30 billion...or more would have been the likely result. In all likelihood, the American taxpayer would have paid the bill, not the citizens of Chicago.

Other than the graft, corruption, overcharging for product, crippleing of an American city while it is going on, the cost of such a thing, I can think of just several hundred more reasons not to have it. None of my reasons are partisan or political in nature.

Did you see the current estimates for London in 2012? They originally were for 4.8 billion but have now grown to 18 billion. The Chicago official estimate was less than 5 billion. With the Chicago propensity to add graft to any legitimate bill, 25-30 billion...or more would have been the likely result. In all likelihood, the American taxpayer would have paid the bill, not the citizens of Chicago.

Did you see the tape of Rush's celebration? He was delirious with joy.

These guys don't love America. They hate it.

Master of the flat statement are we? Whether or not Chicago got the Olympics is secondary in my opinion to the self serving arrogant display this President and his crew put on every time they go out of the country. What did we get 19 out of 94 votes? Running all over the world apologizing for your own country and expecting your personal magnetism, never mind the fact that there is no substance behind it, to sway a bunch of Europeans who really don't like us much anyway, no matter the President, is just ridiculous.

"The longer you let a dog go in the wrong direction the more they think they are going in the right direction" Don Remien.

Who's side you on anyway?
Closely related to this is the Rights celebration over the United States being rejected for the 2016 Olympics. I mean what possible harm could have happened if we had gotten the Olympics? Maybe a feather in the President's cap? Is that what your afraid of ? It is just hard for me to believe that a rational person would be against this.

I heard they spent 100 million trying to get the olympics in chicag.o

I didnt realize that was the presidents duty.

Oh I just remembered ,,he is really a TV personality,,,my badd
Has he had time to put in a days work yet?
No doubt he missed his calling as a marketing manager

Did you see the current estimates for London in 2012? They originally were for 4.8 billion but have now grown to 18 billion. The Chicago official estimate was less than 5 billion. With the Chicago propensity to add graft to any legitimate bill, 25-30 billion...or more would have been the likely result. In all likelihood, the American taxpayer would have paid the bill, not the citizens of Chicago.