***EXCLUSIVE: Donald Trump’s claim he got $150G in post-9/11 state funds for small businesses because he helped people in need is unfounded, docs show

Donald Trump’s tale about why he took $150,000 in 9/11 money is as tall as the Downtown skyscraper he says he used in recovery efforts, according to government records.

Though the billionaire presidential candidate has repeatedly suggested he got that money for helping others out after the attacks, documents obtained by the Daily News show that Trump’s account was just a huge lie.

Records from the Empire State Development Corp., which administered the recovery program, show that Trump’s company asked for those funds for “rent loss,” “cleanup” and “repair” — not to recuperate money lost in helping people.

... If Trump’s company had asked for money for that reason it would have been rejected, officials said.

“He’s clearly wrong. I saw him say that and he’s obviously wrong,” said David Catalfamo, a senior adviser to then-Gov. George Pataki, who helped run the program.

Months ago, Trump patted himself on the back for his imaginary efforts.***

One of Amerka's leading Pepeites, deplorable? I cut and paste you decide.

Matt Forney @basedmattforney

He didn't "rape an unconscious woman." He fingered a drunk whore who was going to fuc* him anyway. #BrockTurner https://twitter.com/JeramyWainwrigh/status/773977419611049984 …https://twitter.com/basedmattforney?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Need more?

***Why Fat Girls Don’t Deserve to Be Loved

...the reason why I say “fat girls” and not “fat people” is because women in general already have much higher rates of mental illness than men; a full 25 percent of American girls are cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs.***

Didja read where the great white dope supporting Pepeite gop was thrown out of office for doing what boy Pepeites do best?

***Jeremy Durham expelled from Tennessee House in 70-2 vote

Embattled Rep. Jeremy Durham, accused of sexual misconduct toward at least 22 women and still under investigation by state and federal officials, was expelled Tuesday from the Tennessee House of Representatives during a special legislative session.

Republicans and Democrats joined together to oust the 32-year-old Franklin Republican, voting 70-2 to cast Durham out after more than an hour of discussion to approve the first legislative expulsion since 1980, and only the second since the Civil War. The House needed 66 votes to remove him.***

Ok, so you are attacking HRC for a relationship she had with someone who died six years ago, for something he did 70 years ago. Apparently you can't find someone alive or that had a racist association this century to associate with Hillary. Grasping at straws methinks.

While on the other hand, Trump didn't quickly reject an unrepentant white supremacist David Duke's endorsement a few months ago. He hired a campaign CEO with links to white nationalism and has been accepting donations from white nationalist leaders. Funny that you think he can't be bought, when he has the same donation links on his website.

Do you need a "safe place" Nit?Do you/did you oppose bringing 90 year old former SS men to trial who were not involved in any crime after May 1945?I would not call "evidence" actual evidence.I say again that you are best described as nearly always wrong but never in doubt.

AFAIK, belonging to an organization, even a deplorable one is protected by our constitution. Even being a member of the SS wouldn't necessarily be enough to try someone. In this great country, you actually need evidence of a crime to bring someone to trial. Do you have any evidence of a crime committed by Byrd? I'm not sure why I even ask, I know the answer. Like everything else LOM brings up, it is unsubstantiated and irrelevant. Another day, another failed analogy.

Someone needs to remind Nit that Al Capone was never convicted of bootlegging, murder or prostitution. He was convicted of tax evasion.I freely admit I have never seen any evidence that Sheets was convicted of anything.The problem I and other thinking people have with Sheets being the Cackler's mentor is that the Democrats in general, and the Cackler in particular, claim to be the champions of minorities and the downtrodden. Sheets repentance is suspect for its' expedience. How many people think the Cackler has ANY convictions other than whatever is currently expedient?