Free Coursework

Knowledge and the curriculum

Knowledge and the curriculum

Today in such a changing society it would be impossible to
have a national curriculum not reflecting such change. Living in a changing
environment effects and changes what each individual in the state is expected
to know. This is very much enlightened when living in a fast changing world
where what was true yesterday turns to be false tomorrow. Who would ever have
taught that the word Internet would have been mentioned in the National Minimum
Curriculum in the late 80's and early 90's when it was still just a network
with the aim of linking data between major Universities and in no one's
vocabulary? Such change in education may be one aspect that has contributed to
the philosophy adopted for the change in the national curriculum and this
change has been designed with a clear vision in mind: Wahda mill-kwalitajiet
ewlenin ta' dan id-dokument hija dik li jqieghed il-htigijiet ta' min qieghed
jitghallem qabel kull ghan iehor. It-tfal, kemm meta ghadhom ckejknin, kif
ukoll meta jsiru adoloxxenti, huma dejjem ic-centru tal-vizjoni kollha u ta'
kull ippjanar u provvediment tieghu. Mary Vella - Curriculum Director, NMC,
1999 ..., hu mahsub li nimxu lejn edukazzjoni li taqdi l-bzonnijiet ta' kull
student individwali. Charles Mizzi - Director of Education, NMC, 1999 There are
in fact a lot more references to the new NMC that could be listed over here as
proof that the learner is at the center of the vision. If we had to look at the
two main ideas on which modern education may be argued we would boil down to
Plato's liberal education and Rousseau's progressive and radical orientations.
The vision mentioned above for the NMC clearly complies with the progressive
orientation where the learner is put at the center. Such revolution, started by
Rousseau, is quite important for us, as the new NMC is all about this: putting
the learner at the center. People think only to preserving their child's life;
this is not enough, he must be taught to preserve his own life when he is a man
to bear the buffets of fortune, to brave wealth and poverty, to live at need
among the snows of Iceland or on the scorching rocks of Malta. - Rousseau, Emile' This has been quite a change. If we had to look at the old
national minimum curriculum, the question was What should we teach? and thus
putting the knowledge at the center. On the other hand, there are other aspects
that link the NMC to the other main theorist (mainly Plato and Dewey). An
interesting point to mention would be the idea of justice which links our
curriculum in the year 2000 to what the first curriculum, written by Plato, had
mentioned 400 years B.C. In fact, the national curriculum starts with Justice
and there is an assumption that we want the society to be socially just. These
ideas show that after observing the various theories of curriculum that emerged
throughout the history of philosophy, we cannot identify one in particular with
which today's curriculum was designed. On the contrary, the result of the
various theories is a rich outpouring of ideas about curriculum, ideas that
continue to influence both reformers and traditionalists (Soltis J. F. &
Walker D. F.). In fact, another contributor to this vision is Dewey who wanted
to define education as growth. As mentioned at the beginning of this write-up,
today the big challenge of education is change. The shadow minister has also
pointed this out when I recently interviewed him on the new curriculum: jekk
l-iskejjel taghna ma jinbidlux, hemm ic-cans li nkunu qed nghalmu tghalim
tal-bierah. Such rapid change is happening because of technology and science.
Information and skills that an individual may learn or 'possess' become
outdated quickly and the person becomes obsolete as discussed during the recent
lectures. The new NMC has included such change as part of its vision to the
Maltese society. Besides clearly stating such awareness at the introduction, it
has been discussed in a section on its own under the topic of An educational
answer for the cultural, social and economic challenges: F'dinja li qieghda tinbidel
b'ritmu mghaggel, il-komunita' edukattiva ghandha tifhem li l-idea li
l-istudenti jistghu johorgu mis-sistema edukattiva obligatorja b'pakkett
edukattiv li jservihom ghal ghomorhom tmur knotra r-realta' ta' dinja li l-hin
kollu qed tinbidel... NMC, 1999 Today the keyword is lifelong learning. Living in
the 21st century, being described as The Learning Age, means that knowledge and
learning today are a very temporarily thing. This makes the traditional
knowledge of education invalid. The principle function of schooling is not in
producing pre-existing relation of production any more. We have the possibility
for education as itself a potential force for change in society and culture.
Such ideas are changing and need to change the way the learners learn. Teaching
computer or I.T. could be a typical example where the rate in which subject
content changes is extremely high due to the technological improvement. It
would be useless to teach a particular computer program say Microsoft Word in
itself if by the time the pupils leave school the program learned (and
examined) will be changed, outdated and scraped out from the market. The aim
instead is to learn how to learn, as by the time the pupils are out of school,
they should be able to cope with the new changing technology. While teachers
should put students in situations where they can practice their skills, they
need to teach various skills such as how to think. The idea of University where
one would 'acquire' a packet of knowledge and use it for the rest of life is
today outdated and invalid. Till some years ago it was enough to have fathers
teach their skills to their son and mothers to their daughters; they again
would repeat the process with their children and so on. Even still, it is not
the case of having the child learning something different from the parent.
Today it's the case that what the child learns is different throughout all
stages in life. This takes us to lifelong learning. As discussed during the
lectures today this is a fact of life. If you don't learn, you don't survive,
economically, socially and all the rest. Such vision is shown throughout the
curriculum especially when it is clearly stated that: Il-kuncett ta'
edukazzjoni tul il-hajja jfisser li l-istudenti johorgu mill-esperjenza kurrikulari
obligatorja b'attitudnijiet u hiliet li jghinuhom ikomplu jitghallmu u jghixu
b'mod effettiv u produttiv f'dinja li daqskemm hi eccitanti tista' tkun
incerta. Today we need to give skills to our pupils amongst which the skill of
learning, that is, knowing how to learn. Such vision will require teaching how
to access information and where to find it rather than giving out information
in itself. We need to teach how to use the Internet that is the biggest
resource in computer (also mentioned by the curriculum various times). More
areas that such curriculum vision would require within the Maltese society
would be teaching how to use libraries, having social skills, interact and
share. The teachers should help in social management skills. This NMC does not
encourage traditional teaching, as it isn't concerned about teaching skills but
teaching facts. Such approach would require a change in the methods the
teachers use. As said by John Bencini, president of MUT, Zgur li l-edukazzjoni
f'pajjizna trid tiffaccja sfidi kbar u dan il-kurrikulu ser ipoggi fuq
l-ghalliema responsabbiltajiet kbar u godda li jistghu jgibu maghhom tibdil
fil-kundizzjonijiet tax-xoghol taghhom. Again in an interview to the minister
he remarked Hemm bzonn li nizviluppaw materjal edukattiv li igghelna nahsbu fuq
is-socjeta' ta madwarna. This has been said in the NMC and certainly applies
for our case. If we are having examinations designed in Malta for the Maltese society, we need to have the teaching resources that also reflect our
curriculum's vision. On the other hand, we should not only focus on the inside
view of the Maltese Society but should also follow the effect our education may
have from its political environment and social-economic aspects as well
mentioned at the objectives of the NMC. Our aims for partnership with the
European Union should be reflected by the education. The learners in our
society, should be knowledgeable about what effects EU may have on Malta, to mention just one. Such education may be well influenced by politics as power
(from whoever may be in power). Power would be one of the two dimensions to the
curriculum and power as domination is bad and removes justice. In such
discussion we may remind that this curriculum was done in three versions with
considerable change between the first and the last version. The vision of
schools that should remove streaming and education should be inclusive and
comprehensive has been 'masked' in the last version due to political reasons.
To conclude, in this new curriculum it is not the case of having the objectives
listed at the beginning and then simply a description of how each should be
achieved but it is clearly seen that the vision & philosophy of the
curriculum are consistent throughout. This shows that great planning has been
involved in the design of this document.

Not what you're looking for?

If this essay isn't quite what you're looking for, why not order your own custom Coursework essay, dissertation or piece of coursework that answers your exact question? There are UK writers just like me on hand, waiting to help you. Each of us is qualified to a high level in our area of expertise, and we can write you a fully researched, fully referenced complete original answer to your essay question.
Just complete our simple order form and you could have your customised Coursework work in your email box, in as little as 3 hours.

Linda Senior Lecturer in Economics, Essay UK Researcher Team.

Search:

About this resource

This coursework was submitted to us by a student in order to help you with your studies.