A landmark court case that would destroy
the so-called "consensus" behind man-made global warming could
be in the works after Weather Channel founder John Coleman expressed his
intention to sue Al Gore for fraud.

Companies that sell "carbon credits" on the
basis that they offset carbon emissions could also be in the firing line
as Coleman stated his conviction that man-made advocates would lose the
case if a fair debate, something that the establishment is loathe to allow,
was allowed to take place.

"Since we can't get a debate, I thought perhaps
if we had a legal challenge and went into a court of law, where it was
our scientists and their scientists, and all the legal proceedings with
the discovery and all their documents from both sides and scientific testimony
from both sides, we could finally get a good solid debate on the issue,"
Coleman said. "I'm confident that the advocates of 'no significant
effect from carbon dioxide' would win the case."

(Article
continues below)

Coleman said that any degree of warming that has taken place
over the last 25 years is beginning to be offset by a recent cooling trend.
China, the largest emitter of carbon dioxide, has just experienced its
coldest
winter for 100 years.

"I think if we continue the cooling trend a couple
of more years, the general public will at last begin to realize that they've
been scammed on this global-warming thing," said
Coleman.

"Does carbon dioxide cause a warming of the atmosphere?
The proponents of global warming pin their whole piece on that,"
he said.

"The compound carbon dioxide makes up only 38 out
of every 100,000 particles in the atmosphere."

"That's about twice as what there were in the atmosphere
in the time we started burning fossil fuels, so it's gone up, but it's
still a tiny compound," Coleman said. "So how can that tiny
trace compound have such a significant effect on temperature?

"My position is it can't," he continued. "It
doesn't, and the whole case for global warming is based on a fallacy."