More importantly: Note the names of reporters here who are pushing these lies.

Reuters: Fayaz Bukhari, a Muslim.

CNN: Mukhtar Ahemad, a Muslim.

BBC: Zubir Ahemad, a Muslim.

@BMD while you always jump to defence of your Queen's own BBC, these people who are reporting a terrorist attack on India as accidental crossfire are the ones who would carry "nothing to see here" narrative when Britishers are killed or raped. They are your people, living among you, who are covering for Islamic barbarism, employing Muslims in large number in their publications so that pro-Islamic bias become implicit, and ensuring that unbridled Islamic migration, coupled with low TFR make you minority is a 2-3 generations.

1.Lit. trapped between two lines of enemy fire. I was caught in the crossfire and dove into a ditch to keep from getting killed.2. and caught in the middle

Click to expand...

So 1. is correct in this case, the bus was caught between two lines of enemy fire, but you chose to assume 2. because you are:

1. Stupid; and
2. Biased.

The BBC did quote witnesses from the bus who said the terrorists targeted them directly, so that plus 'crossfire' equals definition 1.

The owner of the bus, Harsh Desai, was among the injured.

"I saw five to six gunmen right in front of our bus. They were firing indiscriminately and throwing stones at our bus. I told the driver not to stop and just keep driving," he told the BBC.

Click to expand...

The report also specifically says, "caught in crossfire," not "caught in the crossfire." 'The crossfire would refer to specific crossfire between two or more other elements. 'Crossfire' simply means fire from two or more directions.

Next time all of our medias should brought the news with only 'gunmen fire' when there is a terrorists attack in UK .
Wait for next generations UK white would become minority .Until then carrying on this BS@BMD

That's frankly disgusting, Burhan Wani was the head of an internationallty designated terrorist organisation but not surprising. What do you expect from an organisation that actively refused to admit in the 80s and 90s that the Kashmir violence was fuelled by Pakistan? It was the BBC's official policy that no such thing was happening.

Next time all of our medias should brought the news with only 'gunmen fire' when there is a terrorists attack in UK .
Wait for next generations UK white would become minority .Until then carrying on this BS@BMD

Click to expand...

I wouldn't give a shit because I don't go round foreign media outlets trying to find a small semantic issue and then overemphasising it.

The attack comes after some hardline separatist leaders said they welcomed the pilgrims - about 100,000 of whom have already completed the journey - as their fight is not with ordinary Indians. (again, trying to justify terrorism?)

Click to expand...

Including this part is particuarly shocking, the BBC is bascially spreading the terrorists' propoganda for them.