Related Headlines

Three Democrats joined the Republican majority to support the bill. Two Republicans voted against it.

The decisive vote led advocates to predict passage in the House of Representatives, which could take up the proposal in the coming days. And it prompted a leading opposition group to urge members to call their state representatives and persuade them to vote “No.”

“I was under the impression it was going to be a lot closer than that,” said South Portland Police Chief Edward Googins, an opponent of the measure.

The bill, L.D. 652, could make Maine one of only seven states that allow individuals to carry a concealed handgun without a permit. It has 96 co-sponsors, more than half the members of the Legislature, and the blessing of some members of the Republican and Democratic leadership.

The proposal has divided Maine’s law enforcement community. The Maine Chiefs of Police argued that removing the permitting requirement to carry hidden guns would strip away background checks for felons, but the Maine State Police supported the bill during an April 8 public hearing.

State police Maj. Christopher Grotton testified in support, arguing that Maine’s permit system is antiquated and that permitting is inconsistent across the state’s more than 400 municipalities. The permit system does not prevent a dangerous person from owning or carrying a gun, whether hidden or in the open, Grotton said.

The police chiefs in Portland and South Portland, meanwhile, were disappointed in the vote.

“Even though the concealed weapons permit process is not perfect, it does offer a reasonable check without which anyone can carry concealed,” said Googins, the South Portland chief. His department has turned applicants down because of past offenses such as domestic assault, violating a protection from abuse order, possession of drugs, drunken driving and criminal threatening.

Sauschuck, who is currently acting city manager, said the concealed weapons permitting process, which includes training and background checks for criminal history and mental health problems, is a common-sense approach to carrying a firearm.

“If our bar is ‘criminals aren’t following the rules anyway,’ well, then we wouldn’t have any rules,” he said.

ARGUING SAFETY, RIGHTS, BILL’S IMPACT

Dennis Crowell, a concealed weapon permit holder from West Gardiner, was pleased with the Senate vote and hopeful about the bill’s chances in the House.

Crowell regularly carries a concealed handgun for self-defense and is a member of the Capitol Rifle & Pistol Club in Augusta. He knows gun owners who refuse to get the permit because they believe it violates their constitutional rights.

“The opponents have argued forcefully that police will not know who is carrying a firearm. In reality, they don’t know now. There is no centralized database,” Crowell said. “When you really cut to the chase, criminals are criminals because they don’t obey the law. The only people who are going to be influenced by that law are honest citizens.”

Currently, Maine law allows gun owners to openly carry a handgun without a permit. However, concealing a handgun requires a permit from state police or local law enforcement, which includes a “good moral character” requirement and a background check to determine if the applicant is a convicted felon or has been involved in domestic violence disputes.

The bill doesn’t eliminate the permitting system, but it would make the permit optional.

Bill supporters argue that the mandatory permitting system creates barriers for law-abiding citizens to exercise their constitutional right to carry a gun. Opponents have countered that the Second Amendment allows U.S. citizens to bear arms, but it doesn’t protect the right to “hide a gun.”

Critics also have argued that the bill effectively eliminates the screening offered by background checks. That’s especially important, they say, in the case of someone who buys a gun in a private sale and therefore could carry a concealed weapon without a background check or waiting period.

The bill’s sponsor, Sen. Eric Brakey, R-Auburn, argued on the Senate floor Thursday that permits do not guarantee safety or ensure that gun carriers are trained.

Brakey said the proposal is a modest one that allows legal gun owners to carry a handgun while wearing a jacket. Current law, he said, makes legal gun owners “instant criminals” by simply putting on a jacket or hiding their weapon.

He rebutted arguments that the permit law increased firearm safety or protected the public from gun violence.

“A permit is not a guarantee of real training,” he said.

Sen. Stan Gerzofsky, D-Brunswick, said the proposal wasn’t about “guns and coats,” but about rolling back current protections in state law.

“We’re going to protect people who can’t pass a safety test or pass a background check and let them carry a gun anyway,” he said.

Sen. Anne Haskell, D-Portland, a gun owner and concealed weapons permit holder, said the permit system included educational components that explained the implications of carrying and using a gun.

“This is not Hollywood. You don’t wound people in the knee and they fall down,” she said.

POLITICAL STAKES, PAID ADS, LOBBYING

The political stakes attached to the bill are considered high in a state that has a long tradition of spurning gun control bills in favor of looser restrictions. The pressure is also high on Democrats from rural districts and traditional swing districts.

The National Rifle Association has spent about $8,500 lobbying key lawmakers, including dinners entertaining Brakey, Republican leadership, and Democrats who have traditionally supported gun rights legislation and whose votes may be needed to pass the bill in the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives.

The NRA also has engaged its highly active membership with legislative alerts urging them to call lawmakers and tell them to support the bill.

The Maine Chiefs of Police effort to convince lawmakers to reject the proposal has been backed by a volley of paid radio, TV and Web advertising from Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund and the Maine chapter of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America. Everytown for Gun Safety is a political group formed by former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a well-known gun control advocate who has financed efforts to counter the NRA on a wide range of state and federal gun legislation.

How much Bloomberg’s group has spent attempting to influence the vote on L.D. 652 is unknown. The group is using indirect lobbying, trying to coax the public to convince state lawmakers to vote against a particular piece of legislation. State lobbying disclosure laws only require groups to report their advocacy efforts when lobbyists make direct contact with state lawmakers.

The Maine State Police say 36,000 concealed handgun permits, including 12,000 for non-residents, have been issued by the state. The total number of permits is likely much higher because they are also issued by local police and there is no centralized registry.

LEPAGE SEEMS TO FAVOR END OF PERMITTING

Gov. Paul LePage has not explicitly said that he’ll support L.D. 652. However, Grotton, head of the state police, appeared to represent the administration when he testified for the bill. And last year, LePage expressed support for eliminating the permit requirement in a veto message on a bill that would have strengthened the system.

“Eventually, I believe we will see legislation that will allow people to carry concealed weapons without going through the bureaucratic maze of applying for a permit,” LePage said at the time. “Studies are now confirming that where there are more concealed handguns, there is less violent crime. Therefore, I believe that in Maine, where we already have a culture of responsible gun ownership, we should not be making it more difficult for law-abiding citizens to carry concealed weapons.”

It’s not yet clear when the bill will be debated by the House of Representatives.

David Trahan, director of the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine, a hunting and fishing group that supports the bill, said it probably will have enough votes to pass in the House.

A release from Everytown for Gun Safety urged supporters to contact House members and convince them to reject the bill.

Here at MaineToday Media we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion.

To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use. Click here to flag and report a comment that violates our terms of use.

CatsFourSoon

It is amazing how much control the gun lobbyist have over the Republican. Money buys anything – why it even buys the Buffoon Governor who only follows the money not about the need of the people of Maine. Sad time to see this happening. Fredette must have sold his sole on this matter as usual where money is involved!

Bill

This is a Constitutional Right! It has nothing to do with any money! It has everything to do with self protection!

phinious

Doesn’t the constitution reference a “well regulated militia” as the basis of the right to bear arms?

Paul Vitalone

“the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

TruBluMainah

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” – You need to read the whole thing, Paul. You can’t just cherry pick the parts that suit you. That is what phinious is saying. So where in there does it say “concealed carry”? And what part of “well regulated militia”, so conveniently ignored by all the pro gun advocates, do you not understand?

Marco

What money? From a home invasion perpetrated by a left leaning animal!

Marco

Permit, no permit, the animals will carry anyway! They could not care less about any gun law!

wtvlreader

“If our bar is, ‘criminals aren’t following the rules anyway,’ well then
we wouldn’t have any rules,” he said. “Picture a drug dealer walking
down your street carrying a gun concealed and officers can’t do anything
about that. That’s absolutely ludicrous.”

Very poor example Portland Police Chief Michael Sauschuck :

1 Dealing drugs is illegal

2 If it is concealed the police wouldn’t see it to know it exists .

3 If he is a drug dealer, chances are that he is also a felon and would be breaking the law by simply being in possession of a firearm. So concealing it would be the only way he would carry it.

Do we really think a drug dealer, who may be a felon, would say ; Oh I don’t have a concealed carry permit so I should leave my gun at home.?

Criminals don’t care about breaking laws, that is what makes them criminals.

What doing away with the requirement for permits will do, is make it easier for law abiding citizens to protect themselves from rapists and muggers. They may even be able to help you in the event that you are being raped or mugged, or stop a robbery on progress at a store or bank.

phinious

At the risk of shooting my mouth off: I say What? Why? what is wrong with the law we have? why change it? Even in the wild west the cowboys checked their guns before they entered town. I have been known to shoot my mouth off, and I have been known to lose my temper, but I have never felt the need to carry a loaded weapon. Some will no doubt shoot first and ask questions later.

Roland W. Bailey

99.7% of the concealed carry folks have never been in a fire fight, brought up a
weapon on a human target or has ever thought about the fact that bullets don’t stop inside the target but often pass through, changing trajectories indiscriminate of nearby innocents. Have folks who carry a weapon because they can ever considered the fact that when suddenly faced with a shoot situation out of the blue, your body will flood with adrenalin and any motor skills you MIGHT* possess are instantly replaced and your hands become clubs instead of 10 digits working in the right order? Try operating a firearm with two closed fists, that’s what its like. I’ve trained folks who carry firearms for a living and I cringe at the level of incompetence out there. Yes they can hit a static target at 25 yards but that’s about it. BUT that’s the State’s requirement [albeit truncated version, it’s actually 80 out of 100 rounds in the target at distances from 3 to 25 yards]. Case in point. Several years ago, and this was keep relatively quiet, but it’s out there, the Sheriff of Kennebec County, at the police range in Gardiner, was shot in the back by a Deputy who was showing another deputy a method of drawing the Weapon. The gun discharged, went through a shed, ricocheted off the ground and struck the Sheriff, who was on the proper firing line in the back, fortunatly he was wearing body armor on the line as he should have been. I’ve trained with carried and utilized firearms in many aspects of my life and I can tell you from experience that if you think you’re gonna be the Hero of Walmart when it hits the fan guess again. Unless you train, train, train, train, train,and train some more, so much so that when something happens you can run on auto pilot for about 10 seconds before said adrenalin screw you up, you’re gonna be as much of a hazard as the fool who’s causing the issue in the first place. I feel quite confident in saying that I’m an expert in hand gunning and even though I conceal carry, my first duty is to protect myself and my family and shoot ONLY if I have a clear target, a clear field of fire and hopefully some sort of a backstop and have no other option available. Also remember this, if it’s a true cluster and police show up while it’s in progress, you’re a guy with a gun and THAT’S what the police will see. Don’t explain, don’t yell, don’t point. Drop your weapon and get on the ground. Trust me on this.