Republicans did not block stem cell research. They blocked federal funding of fetal stem cell research, by which human babies are ground up for "science". The private sector could have and has done stem cell research, its just that most private sector research does not see much promise and therefore profit in stem cells. If fetal stem cells for "research" was profitable, no federal funding would be necessary. Stem cells can also be harvested from umbilical cord blood, but lazy "scientists" want the larger marrow deposits in the leg bones of aborted babies. Just sayin'. Stem cell milkshakes with acai berries won't make you live forever.Back to the actual topic.Barack Hussain Obama gets huge campaign contributions from Gay Rights groups, yet will not take a firm stand for or against gay marriage. So no matter what side of the fence you are on that, you gotta be a little upset!

You're wrong and obviously one of those lovely openmided right wing Christian alleged pro life people who is more interested in saving an unborn fetus than the health, life and well being of people with asthma, diabetes, parkinson and cancer. How nice and thoughtful of you. The conservative Republicans, via George Bush (I or II, I really don't give a rip since they both f*d up this country) in an effort to keep people paying on the comeback to buy more crugs, more inhalers and more diabetes supplies and meds so the greedy pharmaceutical companies that are the fed gov's cozy little bedfellows can keep getting rich off the poor schmuck with a terminal illness. Who cares that a few hundred people dies from taking a diabetes med Avandia -- the fed knew and so did the FDA ( http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9... ).

Yes, Virginia, it WAS the Republicans who made every effort to halt and stunt stem cell research to cure terminal and chronic illnesses. They don't give a shat about the fetuses, if diabetes and cancer were cured, how would Glaxo make money No one would need the drugs they've got ua all hooked on and they'd lose millions!

I try to provide links when necessary. It prevents people from accusing you of being a LIAR. If someone can't or won't provide links, when necessary, then I take their post with a grain of salt.<quoted text>

Wow! So, are you saying that you are encouraging abortions so that scientists can harvest embryonic stem cells? Should women get pregnant for the sole purpose of generating a fetus to abort and harvest it's stem cells? This is what George Bush and conservatives were afraid of. They are not against research to save people's lives. They are afraid of making it a profitable business to start a human life just to end it for it's stem cells. I cannot find any research that conclusively proves embryonic stem cells work better than stem cells harvesting from the umbilical cord or adult stem cells. Would you happen to know of a source or have a link?

I'm not discussing Big Pharma right now, but just the ideology of using stem cells from aborted fetuses vs from the umbilical cord or adults.

RMQuinn37 wrote:

<quoted text>You're wrong and obviously one of those lovely openmided right wing Christian alleged pro life people who is more interested in saving an unborn fetus than the health, life and well being of people with asthma, diabetes, parkinson and cancer. How nice and thoughtful of you. The conservative Republicans, via George Bush (I or II, I really don't give a rip since they both f*d up this country) in an effort to keep people paying on the comeback to buy more crugs, more inhalers and more diabetes supplies and meds so the greedy pharmaceutical companies that are the fed gov's cozy little bedfellows can keep getting rich off the poor schmuck with a terminal illness. Who cares that a few hundred people dies from taking a diabetes med Avandia -- the fed knew and so did the FDA ( http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9... ).Yes, Virginia, it WAS the Republicans who made every effort to halt and stunt stem cell research to cure terminal and chronic illnesses. They don't give a shat about the fetuses, if diabetes and cancer were cured, how would Glaxo make money No one would need the drugs they've got ua all hooked on and they'd lose millions!

I try to provide links when necessary. It prevents people from accusing you of being a LIAR. If someone can't or won't provide links, when necessary, then I take their post with a grain of salt.<quoted text>

But that's easy for reichtards because all *their* thoughts do come from Fox and other reichtard sites so, their is almost always a link for their bs. Gotta admit that's pretty handy. Sad too.

Wow! So, are you saying that you are encouraging abortions so that scientists can harvest embryonic stem cells? Should women get pregnant for the sole purpose of generating a fetus to abort and harvest it's stem cells? This is what George Bush and conservatives were afraid of. They are not against research to save people's lives. They are afraid of making it a profitable business to start a human life just to end it for it's stem cells. I cannot find any research that conclusively proves embryonic stem cells work better than stem cells harvesting from the umbilical cord or adult stem cells. Would you happen to know of a source or have a link?I'm not discussing Big Pharma right now, but just the ideology of using stem cells from aborted fetuses vs from the umbilical cord or adults.<quoted text>

One of the good things about harvesting a persons own stem cells for treatment is that the body doesn't try to reject them. If you get fetal stem cells you have to be on immunosuppressive drugs for the rest of your life, which leaves you in an "Aids like" state where you are open for all kind of opportunistic infections.

<quoted text>But that's easy for reichtards because all *their* thoughts do come from Fox and other reichtard sites so, their is almost always a link for their bs. Gotta admit that's pretty handy. Sad too.

Thats odd, I don't think I've ever provided a link to Fox News or any other biased source. Meanwhile, all of your links come from left wing sources like moveon.org ..........

WHy of course I would........ I need to get my fifty million in retirement... Let alone my Social Security,, and Compensation, and those food banks.'Plus my bank needs another BAIL OUT....'It is kinda like giving a gold mine------gold.....'Never could figgure --the bugger.....But,,, Hey , it works for me......Sure I would vote him in tomorrow.'Hey , my kids gotta cruise the Carribeans somehow... Then we are all going to Dizney. Did'nt everybody go?????''dh

BREAKING: A few minutes ago, Obama became agitated and walked out of debt ceiling negotiations telling Majority Leader Cantor not to “call my bluff.”What a leader! What a negotiator! What statesmanship! What a crock of shyt! Poor baby, he doesn't get his way, so he has a temper tantrum.....

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.