00iCon wrote:What about vice versa? ERS attacks Su01.Though I agree it is so minor only someone whining about losing too many games would pick up on it. If it takes no effort though it should be fixed.

It was my first time playing this map and the legend is poorly worded.

I could really give a flying truck if the mapmaker chooses to fix this or not because I don't intend to play it again, but perhaps he should make things clearer for future players playing it for the first time.

It seems that when it comes to the Map Inspect icons that BOB displays, bombardment information overrides attack information. Because Soviet Union01 can bombard Polish Control 02 and Soviet Control 01, you don't see that they can attack in return. For the full story, you have to read the Map Inspect text.

I got stuck in this map when I was left with one territory Slovak Control 01 and it seems impossible to do anything theoretically to win/concoer any theritorry from this situation. Is this normal for this Map? when I have only 1 bombarding teritorry there is not anything to do from that point, but to bombard tanks and it is not possible to conquer any territory...Please help if you know more.

altera wrote:I got stuck in this map when I was left with one territory Slovak Control 01 and it seems impossible to do anything theoretically to win/concoer any theritorry from this situation. Is this normal for this Map? when I have only 1 bombarding teritorry there is not anything to do from that point, but to bombard tanks and it is not possible to conquer any territory...Please help if you know more.

with regards,Srđan Krčmaričić

It's possible on any map which has bombard only territories, it's a part of the gameplay which unfortunately sometimes results with people ending up in the situation you find yourself in. One of the main things on a map like this, is to make sure that you don't deploy/move all your armies on to 'bombard only' territs, that is where you can become stuck.

Thought the wording regarding airplanes and tanks was a bit confusing, cost me a few armies but I learned. Besides that, I think it is a good map. Nice dynamics, looks good, and strong theme. I had a fun time playing it.

Amazing map. By far my favorite (and best) on CC. I was wondering, though, now with the XML update involving losing conditions, would it make sense to include the condition that if a player only holds planes they are eliminated? Its not a big deal (like I said, I love this map either way), but it would save a turn or two at the end of games. It would also prevent people who have no chance of winning from attacking other players randomly (or in retribution).

I know the map is quenched and in general I would be hesitant from changing anything on such a good map, but this seems to be the type of map that the new losing condition was made for.

carlpgoodrich wrote:Amazing map. By far my favorite (and best) on CC. I was wondering, though, now with the XML update involving losing conditions, would it make sense to include the condition that if a player only holds planes they are eliminated? Its not a big deal (like I said, I love this map either way), but it would save a turn or two at the end of games. It would also prevent people who have no chance of winning from attacking other players randomly (or in retribution).

I know the map is quenched and in general I would be hesitant from changing anything on such a good map, but this seems to be the type of map that the new losing condition was made for.

Is BOB wrong on this map? It's showing as the territs you listed bombard the territs I listed.

Mine is showing it correctly, I think.Though the graphic only shows that the planes can bombard them, I guess because it wouldn't be possible to have both the graphic of "can attack" and "bombarded by" on the same terit?

Is BOB wrong on this map? It's showing as the territs you listed bombard the territs I listed.

Mine is showing it correctly, I think.Though the graphic only shows that the planes can bombard them, I guess because it wouldn't be possible to have both the graphic of "can attack" and "bombarded by" on the same terit?

Is BOB wrong on this map? It's showing as the territs you listed bombard the territs I listed.

Mine is showing it correctly, I think.Though the graphic only shows that the planes can bombard them, I guess because it wouldn't be possible to have both the graphic of "can attack" and "bombarded by" on the same terit?

BOB gets confused with territories that can be attacked but that bombard back. I noticed it on Kings Court - perhaps the BOB chaps could add another indicator (perhaps in inverted L shape?)

Is BOB wrong on this map? It's showing as the territs you listed bombard the territs I listed.

Mine is showing it correctly, I think.Though the graphic only shows that the planes can bombard them, I guess because it wouldn't be possible to have both the graphic of "can attack" and "bombarded by" on the same terit?

BOB gets confused with territories that can be attacked but that bombard back. I noticed it on Kings Court - perhaps the BOB chaps could add another indicator (perhaps in inverted L shape?)

When Germany invaded Poland the USA was neutral, and it would be two long years before the Americans entered the war leaving Great Britain to do it alone.

Great Britain lost its Empire to defend Europe while America became a super power. Also I seriously doubt Germany would have lost the war were it not for the USSR attacking it from the East after the Germans broke the pact.

hey Ruben....Great Britain lost its empire defending Europe??? Doubtful...UK lost its empire because they over extended themselves over centuries. How dare you infer that America won its superiority at the expense of UK's chivalrous and suicidal defense of an entire continent. The USA bailed Europe out of WWI during many bloody battles. USA wanted no more of their boys to die. We had little reason to enter a second war coming out of a drepression and WWI so recent in memory.

When attacked in the Pacific during WWII, America fought not only a two front war, but also in two hemispheres. USA gained its superiority not by the good fortune of the UK busying herself in battle, but by the hard work, dedication, and pure tenacity of its greatest generation.