This publication constitutes the completely refereed post-conference court cases of the first foreign convention on Swarm Intelligence dependent Optimization, ICSIBO 2014, held in Mulhouse, France, in may well 2014. The 20 complete papers offered have been rigorously reviewed and chosen from forty eight submissions. themes of curiosity provided and mentioned within the convention makes a speciality of the theoretical development of swarm intelligence metaheuristics and their purposes in parts corresponding to: theoretical advances of swarm intelligence metaheuristics, combinatorial, discrete, binary, limited, multi-objective, multi-modal, dynamic, noisy, and large-scale optimization, man made immune platforms, particle swarms, ant colony, bacterial foraging, synthetic bees, fireflies set of rules, hybridization of algorithms, parallel/distributed computing, desktop studying, info mining, info clustering, selection making and multi-agent platforms in response to swarm intelligence ideas, model and purposes of swarm intelligence rules to genuine international difficulties in a number of domain names.

The 2 quantity set LNCS 10072 and LNCS 10073 constitutes the refereed complaints of the twelfth overseas Symposium on visible Computing, ISVC 2016, held in Las Vegas, NV, united states in December 2016. The 102 revised complete papers and 34 poster papers provided during this booklet have been conscientiously reviewed and chosen from 220 submissions.

Extra info for International Citizens’ Tribunals: Mobilizing Public Opinion to Advance Human Rights

Sample text

Branting responded that he would turn over evidence to the defense rather than the court, pending approval by his Commission. He also made ten requests regarding the rights of defendants and witnesses. Werner sidestepped most of Branting’s concerns, but did make a conditional commitment to provide safe conduct to witnesses based on their person and deeds. 42 In the end, Branting did not furnish evidence to either the defense or the court. The real point, however, was that Werner demonstrated an awareness of outside public opinion embodied in the tribunal process; German courts could not just go it alone in such a politically charged case.

His Labour Party decried such an undemocratic proposal and rejected a common front with the Communists, but it was indicative of the prevailing fearful mood. 14 Dimitrov and his fellow Bulgarians had worried since their arrests that Germany would extradite them to Bulgaria to face old criminal charges. Now the situation had changed, as their lives were endangered in a German prison—they wanted to get out at any cost. Emboldened by his success at Leipzig, Dimitrov subsequently telegrammed the Bulgarian prime minister, seeking safe conduct to return to challenge the Soﬁa cathedral conviction.

10 The Brown Book of the Hitler Terror was ﬁrst published on August 1, 1933 by Muenzenberg’s Editions du Carrefour. It was translated into seventeen languages, with the English edition being issued in London on September 1 by Victor Gollancz. The “Brown Book” was directed at European public opinion, and copies were successfully smuggled into Germany to exert an inﬂuence there as well. It sought to counter the German indictment and challenge the legitimacy of the upcoming Leipzig trial by maintaining the innocence of the four Communists, while admitting the guilt of van der Lubbe.