Ahh, now I think I got it.
Thanks again for the prompt reply.
On 06/02/2011 08:50 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Eduardo Bellani <ebellani at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think I understand you, but in that case it should report the
>> undefined reference and stay on the repl, no?
>> The next thing after `a' on the port is end-of-file, so the REPL
> decides that everything is done, and exits.
>>> Thanks everyone of the prompt answers.
>>>> On 06/01/2011 08:37 PM, John Clements wrote:
>>>>>> On Jun 1, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Eduardo Bellani wrote:
>>>>>>> My racket breaks if the following code is executed:
>>>>>>>> (current-input-port (open-input-string "a"))
>>>>>>>> with the following message:
>>>>>>>> reference to undefined identifier: a
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>> That sounds like the right behavior to me, in an environment with a REPL. That is, you set current-input-port to pull from the string "a", then you drop into the REPL, which reads from stdin, producing the string "a", which reads as a reference to the variable a.
>>>>>> No?
>>>>>> John Clements
>>>>>>>>> --
>> Eduardo Bellani
>>>> omnia mutantur, nihil interit.
>> _________________________________________________
>> For list-related administrative tasks:
>>http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev>>>>>
--
Eduardo Bellani
omnia mutantur, nihil interit.