The design studio aims to generate in students a place reading as form and how social fact. It involves harnessing the energy generated by human settlements in their systems occupation of space and complexity of their interaction at different levels of understanding. So it seeks to intervene transforming the place where conflicts have been generated by a bad relationship between population and environment.

Connection with reality

The approach to reality is a complex and particular. The workshop proposed that the student through an exercise approach builds the reality from a committed, from the detection of urban characters and through a process of tracking routes, habits, occupation, etc.. The student must take a reading of the place and its society and nodes detecting flows, higher flows will be understood from the individual dynamics and the generation of human and collective behavior nodes.

Space taken

The residual spaces in informal occupation of space are taken by the population as a whole to develop there as a group all that human need. It is in this scenario flows and exchanges of urban space where we try not projected that students investigate the dynamics generated, analyze them and can use them later as inputs for their project.

Space conflict

Informal employment systems generally territorial conflict with the common heritage of society as a whole. It’s hard for a settlement settler understand why must respect the heritage, as their need for public space or services, occupy, cause pollution and a poor relationship between population and territory. This scenario is so common in our city, is ideal for the student to have a society committed to reading and understanding the role of architecture and the architect is active and purposeful. Students must propose a building that simultaneously improve the quality of life of the population and protect the heritage that represents environment.

Exercise approximation to reality

Students should from the characters detected build individual stories and group presented as cartoons, in them MUST show their level of understanding of urban processes and ways of life of the population. This process will allow them to take the distance between its initial vision and subsequent understanding well the student understands that reality is a complex construction of multiple looks.

Determine situations

Identify Conflict nodes in massive use of space, in traffic and transportation systems, commercial areas or social exchange and Nearby settlements heritage monumental or natural.

Generate Programs

from a point of view identified with the social problems that are already understood, students in the workshop discusses the relevance of an architectural program that generates uses aimed at improving the relationship between society and the environment, the question of the workshop is:

What architecture can do to take advantage of a situation of conflict and create a favorable situation for public use and service that simultaneously protect the environment and reassess?

Urban service system for a conflict

Conflict

Close negative relationship between realities. In the same line item 1, but using larger scales, this issue aims to transform the place of conflict with the tools of the site and the program

Target

Generate a project to help reverse a bad relationship between population and environment.

2. Issues and education

Spaces of success / exclusion spaces

Comparative Exercise detection activated areas in the city and dead spaces guess is usage patterns that generate success in the city they know.

Understand the place

Approaching the site from the emotional, student engagement with society and their needs is the main power that will allow you advance your project research.

Patterns of success and conflict in the place

The student must find out what are the ways to use the space in the workplace, both spontaneous and original that generate a better quality of life, like that conflict.

Project and program to transform

Imagining and propose an architectural intervention that transforms the place and build a better quality of life in the community.

External strategy / site / public space / external filters

How the intervention must react to environmental forces to transform relations conflicting.

Internal Strategy / uses inter-enabled / inner filters

Organize the program from within the project, to get the internal dynamics that need the proposal.

Comprehensive strategy / blueprint

From external and internal strategies, reach and generate one that integrates fluidity and variety of filters that the proposal needs.

The public and private

The complexity of human relationships and filtration systems in space, so that the

intervention can be effective, public and private systems must be separated and integrated at once.

Filters and control points

The complexity of the use of the project, whether it should be permeable and pubic hair, but filterable and private at the same time as going to control access and monitoring, if you have only two control points.

Patterns of use and development of uses

The skill and knowledge of the technical requirements to develop the different uses that the project needs is an essential capability to be developed and applied.

Space systems / flows / visual / filters / connections

The quality of spatial fluency according to the needs of transit into the building from outside and inside.

Structural Systems / relationship structure – space

The criterion for determining what type of structural system that intervention is needed.

Environmental Systems / light / ventilation / sunlight /

The use of light and the systems that make a project livable

Material systems / transparency / opacity / enclosures

Materiality Clear concepts appropriate to the type of intervention that is being proposed and in accordance with the systems of public and private filters.

Comprehensive project support

The student must show eventually the ability to carry out an idea of ​​a transformation from initial studies to final plans. You must be able to support the proposed solvency throughout its conception.

3. Schedule

4. Definitions of basic terms

Public space
It is a collective mental state that occurs in a non-private use and in which everyone can act freely and with equal rights.

Emerging System
“Emergence is what happens when a system of relatively simple elements is organized spontaneously and without explicit laws, to give rise to intelligent behavior.” (Emerging Systems. Or do they have in common ants, neurons, cities and software. Steven Johnson, 2001)

Public service
Any action or component to improve the quality of life of a population above any consideration.

Marginal urban settlement
Community self-recognizable and defined by a moment of emergence in place with social similarities and use of space is settled in the outskirts of a city old matrix and generally do not have adequate services and attention to their basic needs or secondary.

Architectural Strategy
Joint space uses, coordinated in such a way that leads to a specific urban behavior, leading to the enhancement of a positive situation or transforming a negative.

Architectural Proyect
Plan of action to intervene a place with a building, which through a strategy intended uses and relationships significantly transform the reality that occurs at that time.

Successful urban space
Place of public use is intensive and provided in such a way that generates energies of living and quality of life of a population.

Space conflict
Informal employment systems generally territorial conflict with the common heritage of society as a whole. It’s hard for a settlement settler understand why must respect the heritage, as their need for public space or services, occupy, cause pollution and a poor relationship between population and territory. This scenario is so common in our city, is ideal for the student to have a society committed to reading and understanding the role of architecture and the architect is active and purposeful.
A transformation is proposed which simultaneously improves the quality of life of the population and protect the heritage that represents environment.

Space taken
The residual spaces in informal occupation of space are taken by the population as a whole to develop there as a group all that human need. It is in this scenario flows and exchanges of urban space where we try not projected that students involved understanding the dynamics generated, the analyzes and proposes an architecture that enhances and take this energy.

Social Conflict
“Situation in which two or more interdependent individuals or groups seeking to meet interest or perceived incompatible goals” (PCM, 2007)
“Expressed struggle between two or more people who depend on each other and who, in seeking to satisfy their interests or needs, scarce resources are or appear to be, and that conflicting goals or hinder each other” ( OAS PROPAZ).
“Social conflict is a situation-presented as a dynamic process, which occurs when two or more actors or parties perceive each other as an obstacle to the satisfaction of their interests and needs. Because each part performs actions that seek to destroy, defeat, neutralize or control the other “. (Roundtable for Poverty Reduction).

Architectural program
Uses set corresponding to a strategy and shaping a building

There is, inherent in every metropolitan area, a hidden system under the city movement. These are the telephone boxes or payphones. It is not just a particular “opportunity whole” inside the city, but instead, telephone boxes becomes strategic points waiting to be discovered. The clue is in their nature of small items connected that make sense in the complexion of the area in general as the existing network between them.

Since their invention, the amount of telephone boxes has being growing in the city. They have construct places with a lot of people, talking and waiting their turn. The key of the project is in understanding the cabins as a complex network already existing in the city, living together with society moves. The importance is not in the object but in recovering the flows of people that existed before the commercialization of mobile phones.

¿What would happen if we compress telephone boxes, as they were files? ¿What if we concentrate all their nature into a flagstone? We bet on the future with the project cabinas.RAR where technology is introduced as an alternative to oxidized urban cubicles. The objective is changing present relationships and looking for new ways of communication and information far from mobile phones. These spaces, where people go around telephone boxes as they are avoiding obstacles, need to be changed. We bet on accommodating new functions capable of agglomerating people again. In some way, this project look forward converting these spaces from dispersion to connection.

The chabolismo in Andalucia is a very palpable reality. The administrations don’t have the number of immigrants registered, but they are estimated in hundreds of thousands.
Our project centres on Lepe’s locality, Spanish municipality of the province of Huelva, Andalucia. It is in the southwest of the province. It possesses 27.241 inhabitants of which 19 % is immigrant (5150 inhabitants). In the main they are sub-Saharan. The major incentive has been the culture of the strawberry (principal economic source close to the tourism). We go away to centring in the shanties constructed by the own immigrants, bearing his living conditions in mind.

APPROXIMATION

RE-THINK & RE-USE

The Pentagon has been alienated from its identity, it’s hard to feel oneself at home in the metropolis’ beating heart.

But can an architect restore – let alone create – a home? If we look up the origins of this rather vague term, one can perceive a fundamental differ- ence between the mental and the material aspect of living man has made throughout history. The Greeks spoke about hestia, the religious midpoint of a dwelling, and oikos, the house as a structure. In German one translates the former as heimat, which doesn’t only mean home, but also the relation- ship of man towards a certain space. Henceforth an architect couldn’t be able to build a home, since it doesn’t concern something material.

Or can he? We divided the manifestation of the concept of home into three aspects: memory, that what one remembers as well as what one has been taught, identity, how one is or appears to be as an individual, and ter- ritory, the space one relates oneself to. Maybe we can’t influence home per se, but we can manipulate these manifestations.
The first brings us to the historical context of the site: rather than a revival of functions, we restored some iconic images, through the use of certain seemingly classical typologies like a courtyard, a gallery and a grand café. The second aspect concerns local (building) traditions: instead of thwarting an old habit, we reinterpreted the typical non-urban typology of housing.
For territory we formulated a solution against the privatisation and seg- regation in society.

These 3 aspects of home mainly focus on personal individual qualities but a fourth important component of being home is feeling part of a so- cial network. In our individualistic society this is a quality one has to re- establish and emphasise without losing the luxury of personal space. We introduced the concept of ‘hoodhouses’ as a communal space for a number of families to help them to create their own neighbourhood. By using this tool we give attention to a good gradual transition between public and private space.

In the face of the urban exodus from the center of Brussels towards the city fringes and countryside areas, alternative housing typologies in the city center are lacking. Growing mobility problems, a growing need for affordable housing for young families and a growing need for more valuable activities in the public space intensify the secluded character of qualitative living areas in Brussels.

The reallocation of Parking 58 is a compact ensemble of living units, collective spaces and green public area. Even though the monolithic building lies on an exclusive space, it functions as a space of exclusion: nowadays it is nearly impossible to design dominant large-scale architecture for the car on such a prominent place in the dynamic heart of the city. Parking 58 demands a thorough rethinking of its destination. The late modernistic architecture by D’Haveloose and Lipski (1958) with its emphasis on the circulation of the car – most apparent in the spatial experience of driving the car up in the building and thereby getting a panoramic view over the city – has been rethought on the level of living in the building. In other words, the ideology that once was applied for the car user, has now been approached from the perspective of the ‘slow’ user, namely the resident and the pedestrian visitor. The existing repetitive grid structure and the up-going spiral of the building are considered as valuable remaining elements to implement the strategy. Although it seems evident to fall back on the ordinary inflation of units and functions following the grid structure, this idea was excluded. From our personal conceptions and discussions, four guidelines were formulated to reply to the existing structure: directing the eye, meaning the visual experience one has constituted by architectural space in and outside the building; the extension of the rear side of the house, meaning the possibility to extend the living units of the residents; thepocket spaces, focusing more on the spatial experience of living in the unit; and the in-between spaces. Living this way leads to a more free use of the given space in which collective spaces contribute to it. Experiencing the building is translated, as making a promenade through a succession of spaces whereby the confrontation with the grid has not been put aside (see the passage, the pentagon and the spiral). From our point of view, it does not seem evident to change the average settled idea of people having their own mainstream house-garden model. This being said, our project suggests a new concept towards qualitative living and housing in the city.

In order to come up with an individual interpretation of the experiments that we conducted so far, we defined a brief, some rules of the game to cristallise a guideline leading our architectural proposals.

After the break, find two of the four proposals of our team.

DESIGN PROPOSAL 1 – By Antonios AMSPACH

The first proposal starts with a negotiation between the individual and the collective space. The divisions between them give clear site to work with. The challenge starts when the suburban facade, which used to hide behind hedges and fences in order to satisfy the user’s need for security, is revealed. This architectural proposal is focused on negotiating the face to face space between the individual and the collective user. Introducing alternative territorial depths as an alternative ways of using the suburban home. Strategies of social surveillance are suggested taking the issue of social and territorial control into account. The individual can satisfy his/her need for security. The proposal treats materiality as a subtle sequential gap trying to create patterns in order to distinguish the proper distance for privacy. Finally, emergent material patterns provide the possibility for desired overlapped scenarios ( people talking on the streets of suburbia, children playing in front of the houses and not only back to the private gardens) which can give life to the suburban community.

Learning from suburbia, learning from boundaries, facing the users, understanding their needs are some of the pieces which completed the puzzle of this project. Negotiating with the users in terms of individual and collective space, privacy and materiality to reform, upgrade the experience of living in suburbia. The upper aim of this project is the lost “Hello” which is missing from today’s suburb. People bringing the city’s urban culture, conflicting with the suburban one appears to rule upon the latter. Just by saying hello will reopen opportunities for social interaction and will give back to the suburb the gift of the “welcome”.

DESIGN PROPOSAL 2 – By Sarah POOT

The second design assumes that the current inhabitants of Wenduine will need specific arrangement in terms of daily accessibility. The proposal takes advantage of the tremendous amount of space availlable (15% only of
the garden area is actually used) to redistribute the existing functions on the groundfloor and hence to, increase elderly’s autonomy.

The proposal invests the existing upper floors to relodge new family patterns (single parent family, over educated young couples seeking a first job in their late twenties, …) with lower income.

The design takes into account the fact that suburbanites use to turn their outdoor space into sequential gaps, tend to use extra-space as a buffer between their individual sphere and the outsiders. However the strategy proposes to assert this behaviour and consider sequential gaps as possible benefit, it will reconfigure the sequences of spaces in order to provoke overlapping situations. The existing living spaces are relocated in such a way that they amplify a deconstructed space thanks to bufferings alternatively playing the part of sequential gap or overlap scenario given the seasonal behaviours.

With an eye to use architecture and design as agents for social change, the proposal will try to encourage new social relationship, practices and uses of the residential space trough the materiality of reconfigured boundaries. Today’s urban fabric in the residential area of Wenduine is roughly composed of an average detached house turning back to each other and endlessly repeated. Our various interviews revealed that the inhabitants of the residendential area of wenduine claim for privacy, solitude, exposure and security.

Reinvestment of the parcels generates a tangle of alternating full and empty, of accessible zones as well as unacessible. At the crossing of three parcels or more, the courtyards offer a potential for increased use that will allow the community to interact over the course of daily activities. The shelves integrated in the walls structure may host among other things storage for gardeners, bicycles racks, vertical gardens, informal seating, rabbit breeding or other little pleasures of spare time able to generate attractiveness for meeting and exchange.

The wooden light-frame building is based on a tri-dimensional grid of 65 centimeters, which integrates all the technical and structural elements. The modularity of the grid considers the eventuality of future additions and guarantees both low cost and rapidity of construction trough prefabricated elements. The unusual thickness of these walls can also integrate a system of storage, visible or invisible, and can be accessed from one side or the other, sometimes from both.

Short spans between those walls allow a effective provision of portal system, occasionally freeing some walls of structural frame. The design features large glass openings, bluring boundaries between indoor and outdoor space while maintaining visual contact that amplifies the perceived space. Horizontal filters combined to vertical openings generates overlapping sequences of space and light, and protect the inhabitants of different levels from unwanted visual contact.

Flat roofs that overhang thoses portals are vegetalised to provide to the upper level residents non accessible extensive ornemental gardens while ensuring an excellent thermic and accoustic comfort to the inhabitants of the lower levell. Pitched roofs are uncovered to offer accessible courtyards to the upper level unit. The remaining existing structure of the roof allow the passage of light while providing privacy to its users. In general, the doors are replaced by screens and windows with frames that go beyond the mere utility range. A large rotating doorshelf for instance, plays with perspective to increase the readability of reunited spaces, while a window facing its alter ego blur the boundaries from one space to another.

Over provoking social interaction and a solution toward sustainable development in those times of growing population, the main effect of the project would be to expand in space one’s sence of belonging while reinforcing his « privacy zone ».

People tend to appropriate themselves the space they are evolving in. For instance, the path one is used to walk trough to go his work place, the shop where he does his weekly grocery shopping, the bakery he goes to in order to bring back croissants to his wife on sunday mornings are refered as « my street », « my neighbourhood », « my living environment ».

At first, colloquial use of the multiplicity of paths and potential destination spaces proposed by the design strategy will complexify and extend the scope of their belonging sense to the next street, the next neighbourhood. On the other hand, the materiality of the architectural design will guarantee high intimacy in proximity (trough the multiplication of human-scaled rooms, enclaved courtyards, and alcoves in the walls among others) and high privacy levels (ensured by a specific configuration of space and a set of screens controlling the visual relations).

_ the proposal seeks to give a new identity in order to differentiate itself from the existing environment.

_ possible to intervene in the area because of the many unexploited urban spaces.

_ the model we propose is a kind of cohabitation composed of private homes supplemented by shared facilities.

_ a key feature of this model is its flexibility according to the visual flee in all directions, forming a wedge shapes.

_ the shared green space is another key feature. The logic of green roofs, sometimes accessible and sometimes not, in their development as they run across the whole building, recommends stops, gatherings and actions , working binding.

_ formation of private and public spaces that serve the needs of modern living.

_ orientation of living rooms, yards and balconies in relation to the sun and the sights.

_ in the middle is organized a central public core, in direct interaction with the existing buildings, which is accessible on the ground floor through the lateral galleries.

_ the character of the central core has mixed use (αccommodation, entertainment, shopping, employment and recreational activities) are all available in the immediate vicinity and preferably within walking distance.

_ the housing building consists of apartments and houses for habitation, where different types of families will live in these units. The forms of cohabitation should not be limited to the existing family model.

_ residents also share activities which may include gardening, child care centers, offices, access to internet, recreational and educational opportunities.

_ its ideal for people who have an apartment, but do not want to feel isolated within it.

_ the design encourages both social contact and personal space. Private homes contain all the features of conventional homes, but residents also have access to extensive common facilities.

_ the beauty of the co – housing model is that every resident has the freedom to choose how much or how less they wish to participate in this lifestyle.