Chat Edit Rule

Forum page

So, As an admin, and as another admin, Jäzzi, (Know known as EnemyPeacemaker) have said, we are thinking about dropping the Chat Edit Requirement and as a rule we need to have a group discussion about this. Slayingthehalcyon(Talk)15:29,1/11/20134,178

Contents

Comments

Well I do not use the chat, but other peoples does. Also, if the chat policy will be dropped it can also mean that others will advertise through the chat freely and can freely rebel against this wiki about that advertising is not included to the rule. So I am actually in consideration in dropping it or not. KidProdigy(Local Userpage ⁝ Local Talk) 15:32, January 11, 2013 (UTC)

I would like the chat edit rule to be dropped. When it was put in place, a few users were following me from Central chat to this chat. I wanted to get a way for them to not come into the chat as I felt stalked. But now that's not a problem. I'd like to be more community oriented now, and with chat we can do that. Advertising may be a problem, but we can revise the rules. – EnemyPeacemaker 15:37, January 11, 2013 (UTC)

Revising the policy came also in my head after writing that. Well then I have nothing to say than agree with you. KidProdigy(Local Userpage ⁝ Local Talk) 15:45, January 11, 2013 (UTC)

Tackle is kick an pd I think Hyper Beam is Ban or something. Yeah I was confused with the weird names at first but the symbols at the side of the commands make it slightly easier. Rainbow Shifter 23:04, January 13, 2013 (UTC)

If I remember correctly, we used to get onto users for linking other websites. But I don't think that we want to do anything like that, because sometimes that helps with chatting. But that is only just as a long as they didn't give out links to another wiki and what not.

Youtube, is fine.

Facebook can be PM'ed or be put out to all of chat, (Preferably PM'ed)

Twitter can be PM'ed or be put out to all of chat. (Preferably PM'ed)

Sensual websites, are not okay. (Please don't say the names of any or say what I'm saying, because my computer will immediately block this page. Thanks in advance)

yay and nay

I'd approve of it being abolished. From the looks of it (correct me if I'm wrong) the chat isn't that populated (from my experience, anyway) so I wouldn't see that much harm letting users with under the current edit number in. For now, I'd reckon it's better trying to get more users in chat regardless of editcount. Ozu 17:21, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

I would also approve the abolishment seeming as having that big red message on chat when you join can be a bit threatening and daunting to new users and turn them away from us and make them less likely to edit more (something we currently need) Rainbow Shifter 17:25, January 22, 2013 (UTC)