Welcome to HVAC-Talk.com, a non-DIY site and the ultimate Source for HVAC Information & Knowledge Sharing for the industry professional! Here you can join over 150,000 HVAC Professionals & enthusiasts from around the world discussing all things related to HVAC/R. You are currently viewing as a NON-REGISTERED guest which gives you limited access to view discussions

To gain full access to our forums you must register; for a free account. As a registered Guest you will be able to:

Participate in over 40 different forums and search/browse from nearly 3 million posts.

Fact. The Bush tax cuts put alot of money in the top 10%.
Fact. The tax cut on Capital Gains was supposed to spur investment thereby creating jobs
Fact. Job growth under the leadership of GWB was pathetic
Fact, Not spin, the results of this tax cut favored the well heeled (his base) and did nothing for the job market.

The same hymn is being sung now. Give more tax cuts for the job creators and all will be well. When is enough enough, they got the tax cuts, where are the jobs. No more excuses, I will sign up for the program if it works but it hasn't and won't. Corporations are sitting on a ton of cash as are the most wealthy and all we hear are excuses concerning jobs. If it works - it works if it doesn't obviously another method should be tried.

It ain't what you don't know that gets you in trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.

Fact. The Bush tax cuts put alot of money in the top 10%.
Fact. The tax cut on Capital Gains was supposed to spur investment thereby creating jobs
Fact. Job growth under the leadership of GWB was pathetic
Fact, Not spin, the results of this tax cut favored the well heeled (his base) and did nothing for the job market.

The same hymn is being sung now. Give more tax cuts for the job creators and all will be well. When is enough enough, they got the tax cuts, where are the jobs. No more excuses, I will sign up for the program if it works but it hasn't and won't. Corporations are sitting on a ton of cash as are the most wealthy and all we hear are excuses concerning jobs. If it works - it works if it doesn't obviously another method should be tried.

Corporations are holding on to their reserves for a reason. It might have something to di with the eat the rich anti corporate mantra coming out of Washington.

Whats your alternative to putting the money back in the private sector ? Giving it to Washington for re distrubirion to potential voters sisnt working too well.

Fact. The Bush tax cuts put alot of money in the top 10%.
Fact. The tax cut on Capital Gains was supposed to spur investment thereby creating jobs
Fact. Job growth under the leadership of GWB was pathetic
Fact, Not spin, the results of this tax cut favored the well heeled (his base) and did nothing for the job market.

The same hymn is being sung now. Give more tax cuts for the job creators and all will be well. When is enough enough, they got the tax cuts, where are the jobs. No more excuses, I will sign up for the program if it works but it hasn't and won't. Corporations are sitting on a ton of cash as are the most wealthy and all we hear are excuses concerning jobs. If it works - it works if it doesn't obviously another method should be tried.

If they were as such, why were they renewed on Obama's watch?

FACT: GWB job growth as a monthly average has outperformed Obama so far.

Your facts ARE spin. Pure and simple.

Try using google. Might help your sorry view of what a fact is.

"Most people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so." ― Bertrand Russell

Incidentally, the US has now generated 3 million jobs since the trough of the recession in September 2010, until which point it had previously lost 8 million. Unfortunately, since the real labor force has grown by 4.6 million over the same period, or at the conventionally accepeted 90,000 labor pool entrants per month for 51 months, despite what the BLS may say, because America is after all growing, this means that the Obama administration has created a negative 1.6 million jobs net of demographics, which in turn have cost the US a modest $5.1 trillion in new debt, or an even modest $3.1 million in debt for every job lost.

Bush took office and there were approximately111,600,000 people employed in the private sector. At the end of his first term in 2004 there were only approximately110,600,000 a loss of about 1,000,000 jobs. Averages would be convenient way of making a bad situation look reasonable. Fact is at the end of each term the Shrub served the job numbers were worse than when he started. No graph needed the results are clear the cuts did not increase the number of jobs in either of the Bush terms.

It ain't what you don't know that gets you in trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.

Bush took office and there were approximately111,600,000 people employed in the private sector. At the end of his first term in 2004 there were only approximately110,600,000 a loss of about 1,000,000 jobs. Averages would be convenient way of making a bad situation look reasonable. Fact is at the end of each term the Shrub served the job numbers were worse than when he started. No graph needed the results are clear the cuts did not increase the number of jobs in either of the Bush terms.

Ok, so we have facts and you have spin.

Fine, just so we know what you're about on the field of debate.

Further, your post did not address my statement in a clear tactic of avoidance.

"Most people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so." ― Bertrand Russell