As is documented in Appendix B, you may read up on how the Jesuits were behind the perfection of practical communism in the Paraguayan Reductions of the 17th and 18th century. In it you will further find evidence that the Jesuits were the secret driving force behind the Bolshevik revolution; that Rasputin and Marx were Jesuit agents; and that Stalin was trained by Jesuits. In other words, the Vatican was the secret master of communism.

Documented in Appendix C, you may read that Hitler was helped to power by the Vatican; that Germany was “to become the Sword of the Catholic Church;” that the signing into law of a Reichkonkordat cemented the cooperation between the Vatican and Nazi Germany; that the hand of the Jesuits was pervasive in Nazi Germany, especially in the SS; that Mein Kampf was ghost-written/heavily edited by a Jesuit priest; you may also read how the Jesuits exercised control over Nazi leadership through education and that Joseph Goebbels himself was trained by Jesuits. In other words, the Vatican was the not so secret master of Nazism.

Since the Vatican controlled both conflicting parties, it can safely be deduced that World War II was indeed a guided or Hegelian Dialectic, rather than a spontaneous or genuine dialectical clash. Since the Vatican was the ultimate master of the two camps, it is also reasonable to assume that it determined when war was to break out and what course it was to take.

If what I say to you is done, many souls will be saved and there will be peace. The war is going to end: but if people do not cease offending God, a worse one will break out during the Pontificate of Pius XI. Second Secret (excerpt)

Since this secret allegedly was spoken in 1917, and since World War I ended in November 1918, it was not hard to predict that indeed World War I were to soon afterwards come to an end.

What is more interesting is the conditional prediction of another, even greater war than the Great War. Pope Pius XI died 10 February 1939 and it is generally accepted that World War II started on the first of September 1939, when Hitler invaded Poland. Had Pius XI lived for about half a year longer then Fatima’s second secret would have been accurate to the tee. Whoever wrote the scripts of the Our Lady of Fatima secrets must have assumed Pius XI would still be alive when WWII would break out. Of course, when you write these kind of predictions years in advance you cannot always expect perfect accuracy. This one proved no exception.

So who wrote those scripts? It’s the same power that controlled both the Nazis and the Communists. It was thus the Vatican itself who could decide when to start the next “greater war,” and so turn the revelations of Fatima’s Second Secret into a self-fulfilling prophecy. It was all theatrics, albeit on a truly grand scale.

Another effect of the breaking out of World War II is to weigh heavy on the consciences of the Catholics of Europe, the coming to pass of the predictions contained in the Second Secret then implies that people apparently have failed to “cease offending God.” As such, the eruption of the war is not only pinned on an angry and vengeful God but especially on the God-fearing Catholics who likely recoil in shame and guilt. People in a state of shame and guilt are more easily controllable and unifiable, so this effect also gives you an answer to the question cui bono (who benefits) from this grand charade surrounding Our Lady of Fatima.

If my requests are heeded, Russia will be converted, and there will be peace; if not, she will spread her errors throughout the world, causing wars and persecutions of the Church. Second Secret (excerpt)

With respect to the allegory of behavioral control through the “carrot and the stick”, basically the Soviet Union can be regarded as the secret “stick” of the Vatican. The apparition of the Virgin Mary at Fatima can be regarded as the “carrot”, serving to corral Catholic support across Europe against the emerging new “godless” but powerful enemy of the Church: the Soviet Union. A related way of looking at this dialectic is provided by the good cop, bad cop view. The Soviets were to be the bad cop, causing the Catholics to flee in the arms of the good cop, the Catholic Church, represented by Nazism and Fascism.

Destruction of Protestant Prussia (Picture: bombing of Dresden)

Persecution of Jews (picture: Holocaust)

Stalin's great purges, the elimination of political dissidents

A consequence of this brutal dialectic was the transformation of Europe into a bloody and heartless “theater of war.” As to its purpose, anti-Vatican researcher Eric Jon Phelps explains:

Additionally, in the little town of Fatima, Portugal three children, ages seven to fourteen, supposedly saw “Mary” appear six times between the spring and fall of 1917. This unbiblical, Jesuit-contrived, “Lady of Fatima” Hoax, calling for the “conversion” of Tzarist Russia to Catholicism, was the religious propaganda used to incite and then unite the superstitious masses of Europe to attack Rome’s ancient Orthodox foe with fire and sword! As a result, from 1917 to 1989 Russia would be conquered and then reduced to obedience to the Jesuit General’s “infallible” Pope, using the Russian branch of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta! The Society of Jesus would launch the Bolshevik Revolution and brutal Civil War (1917-1920); it would then negotiate a secret Concordat (a treaty between Lenin and the Pope) and establish the Inquisition through its “Grand Inquisitor”—the thug—Josef Stalin, using his Jesuit-admiring hatchet man and head of the Cheka, Felix Admundovich Dzerzhinsky, whose father, Admund Dzerzhinsky was a Jesuit-controlled, Polish Roman Catholic priest. Stalin would purge the nation of its Protestant and Baptist churches and, near the end of his life in 1953, attempt to kill every Russian Jew. The Company, using the Lady of Fatima Hoax and Hitler, would also ignite a huge anti-Russian Orthodox/anti-“Russian Jewish Communist” Crusade called “Operation Barbarossa” (1941-1945; named after Germany’s Holy Roman Emperor, Frederick I Barbarossa (1152-1190), having led his armies through Orthodox Asia Minor during Rome’s Third Crusade against the Moslems in control of Jerusalem); and then, the Black Pope would create “the Cold War” (using CFR/CIA Knights of Malta) enabling his KGB to continue his Order’s Communist Inquisition in its new papal dominion, the “USSR” (1945-1989), won for its Roman Priest-King. Eric Jon Phelps – Vatican Assassins III (p. 786)

“in Utopia, where every man has a right to everything, they all know that if care is taken to keep the public stores full, no private man can want anything; for among them there is no unequal distribution, so that no man is poor, none in necessity, and though no man has anything, yet they are all rich; for what can make a man so rich as to lead a serene and cheerful life, free from anxieties;” Thomas Moore - Utopia (1515)

Thomas Moore's "Utopia"

The Vatican’s Undying Fetish for Socialism

Socialism refers to various theories of economic organization advocating public or direct worker ownership and administration of the means of production and allocation of resources, and a society characterized by equal access to resources for all individuals with a method of compensation based on the amount of labor expended.[1][2][3]

Most socialists share the view that capitalism unfairly concentrates power and wealth among a small segment of society that controls capital and derives its wealth through exploitation, creates an unequal society, does not provide equal opportunities for everyone to maximise their potentialities[4] and does not utilise technology and resources to their maximum potential nor in the interests of the public.[5]

Friedrich Engels, one of the founders of modern socialist theory, and Utopian socialist Henri de Saint Simon advocated the creation of a society that allows for the widespread application of modern technology to rationalise economic activity by eliminating the anarchy in production of capitalism.[6][7] This would allow for wealth and power to be distributed based on the amount of work expended in production, although there is disagreement among socialists over how and to what extent this could be achieved.

Socialism is not a concrete philosophy of fixed doctrine and programme; its branches advocate a degree of social interventionism and economic rationalisation (usually in the form of economic planning), but sometimes oppose each other. A dividing feature of the socialist movement is the split between reformists and revolutionaries on how a socialist economy should be established. Some socialists advocate complete nationalisation of the means of production, distribution, and exchange; others advocate state control of capital within the framework of a market economy. Wikipedia

The Webbs quote from a speech of Stalin’s delivered in January, 1934, at the 17th Congress of the Communist Party of Russia: –

“These people (“leftist blockheads,” he calls them elsewhere) evidently think that Socialism calls for equality, for levelling the requirements and the personal lives of the members of society. Needless to say, such an assumption has nothing in common with Marxism, with Leninism. By equality Marxism means, not equality in personal requirements and personal life, but the abolition of class. . . .” (Soviet Communism, p. 702.)

Stalin’s speech contains one true and important point, that Socialists are interested primarily in abolishing the private ownership and control of the means of life which is the basis of class division. Stalin is also right in repudiating the idea that Socialists aim at imposing uniformity. marxists.org

So basically socialism entails the abolition of class, achieved by enforcing social equality and equality of access to goods and services.

“The Third Reich is the first power which not only recognizes, but puts into practice, the high principles of the Papacy.” — Avro Manhattan quoting Vice Chancellor Von Papen, Bill Hugh’s – Secret Terrorists, chapter 7

It is interesting to observe the affinity the Vatican has for socialism. Since it was responsible for raising both flavors, National (Nazism) and International (Communism), one cannot help but wonder why the Papacy is so fond of socialism.

First off, as already documented in the beginning of Appendix B, communism is indeed a Jesuitical invention, crafted to perfection already during the 17th and 18th centuries in the Paraguayan Reductions. Keeping in mind the socialist credo being that the State is God, in the Reductions the Jesuits openly comprised the State and so the Jesuits could be regarded as God by their, relatively retarded, Indian subjects, whereas in communism the Jesuits were hidden so as to give the illusion of indeed a godless State. Apart from a no doubt colossal bureaucratic difference, this seems to be the only fundamental difference between the two brands of socialism. That is, the Indians as well as the Russians were about equally subjected to abject slavery and extreme exploitation.

Anyway, to return to try to answer the question as to why the Papacy developed socialism, let’s first assume a society based on the pillar of ideal socialism: equality. Now, in this type of society everyone is the same in the sense that everyone has equal authority. If all members of this society would be perfect and law-abiding, then it would likely function as a well-oiled machine, impervious to hamper or malfunction. There would be no conflicts or crises since everyone acts in a perfect and ideal manner, thus also avoiding any and all hiccups in a perfect and ideal manner.

As we all know however, human beings are anything but perfect and indeed our imperfection stands to lead to all kinds of conflicts and crises in our imaginary society. How serious would these conflicts be? In principle, potentially very serious. In fact, they would likely be fatally serious to the integrity of its society. Why? Well, suppose that two members got into a dispute over some unspecified thing. In order to resolve the dispute, since they both have equal authority, who gets to be right and who gets to be wrong? By cause of absence of an external arbiter or judge, the emergence of time-consuming deadlock situations are therefore not unthinkable and are but a practical consequence of not infallible constituents. After all, both have equal authority in the matter and if both are also equally stubborn, the conflict may carry on indefinitely. Or suppose in another situation that a crime is committed. How does the victim see some form of justice and retribution in which the perpetrator is apprehended and reprimanded?

If enough of these stalemate crises occur simultaneously, then there’s a very real chance of derailing the activity of the society as a whole. Society may either grind to a halt in collective apathy and frustration or perhaps shatter into a set of mutually hostile camps.

Obviously the prospect of absence of societal stability is not a desirable one.

So, how to avoid this potential disaster? Simple, install a governing class who will act as dispute arbiters, so that conflicts and crises between its constituents can be resolved relatively swiftly. But there’s the catch right there. By virtue of installing a governing class, the notion of a purely socialistic society has already been compromised since this governing class has to have an authority superseding any and all of its constituents. Hence socialism, if practically feasible, must consist of two classes: the normal class, consisting of the bulk of the people, and the exceptional ruling class, imbued with transcendental authority. Note that a possible middle class, hoovering in between both classes, is redundant, in principle.

The Communist Manifesto.

This is precisely what communism entails: a unified and homogenized worker class governed by an all powerful ruling class (the State):

According to the Communist Manifesto, all these were prior conditions for a transition from capitalism to communism, but Marx and Engels later expressed a desire to modernize this passage.[9]Wikipedia

Since the workers again end up in bondage and end up being exploited, we have come back to a kind of society that was typical of the European Dark Ages. An Age in which the despotic high and mighty Vatican thrived but that lost considerable power with the advent of the liberating Protestant Reformation. Practical socialism (communism) is a means of restoring that long lost dream of the Vatican. This has to be the reason why the Vatican recently has openly recognized Marx, founder of “godless” communism. This also explains the affection of the Jesuit Superior General, Adolfo Nicholas, for the Marxist colored Liberation Theology.

“I admit the Pope can absolve Catholics from allegiance to the form of government under which they reside.” — Priest McDermott, in a sermon in Philadelphia, April 15, 1894.

“The will of the Pope is the supreme law of all lands.” — Archbishop John Ireland, St. Paul, Minn.

Why is it the Pope has such tremendous power? Why, the Pope is the ruler of the world. All the emperors, all the kings, all the princes, all the presidents of the world are as these altar boys of mine. The Pope is the ruler of the world.” — Priest Phelan in Western Watchman, June 27, 1912.

“All Catholics should exert their power to cause the constitutions of the States to be modeled to the principles of their church.” — Pope Leo XIII, November 7, 1890.

“Many non-Catholics fear us as a political organization and are afraid that the Catholic Church will dominate and rule; we are working quietly, seriously, and I may say effectively, to that end.” — June Number, 1909, of The Missionary (R. C), p. 26.