Did you know that you can download a bibliography of all content available on PEP Web to import to Endnote, Refer, or other bibliography manager? Just click on the link found at the bottom of the webpage. You can import into any UTF-8 (Unicode) compatible software which can import data in “Refer” format. You can get a free trial of one such program, Endnote, by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:

Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here. Once there, click the 'Forgotten Username/Password' button, fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." If this does not work for you please click here for customer support information.

To quote the back flap of this poetic, intriguingly simple, and nontheoretical little book, “M. Robert Gardner lives in Boston. He is a psychoanalyst, a teacher, a founder of the Psychoanalytic Institute of New England, a Sunday painter, and a summer naturalist.” In order to gauge the wisdom of this characterization one has to take an evening off to read the book. Self Inquiry turns out to be written by a psychoanalyst of the purest water, in spite of the author's unconventional way of reasoning.

Gardner strikes a provocative note from the beginning:

Psychoanalysts fritter away large chances in half-truths. Psychoanalysts ape the forms and foul the spirit of yesterday's classics and of today's revolutions. Psychoanalysts are beset by orthodoxies of the right, orthodoxies of the left, and orthodoxies of the middle of the road. (p. 3).

He finds “psychoanalysts trying mechanically not to be mechanical” (p. 4). “We want to be one way, and we find we are, over and over, despite our best efforts, exactly the opposite” (p. 6).

I think that most experienced analysts will find such paradoxical formulations provocative but, above all, profoundly true. Most of us have stumbled upon them ourselves, although we never wrote them down, talked about them, or perhaps even formulated them distinctly to ourselves.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]