House Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) said in a statement Friday evening that he was pleased with how the interview with top Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin went.

“The interview with Ms. Huma Abedin has concluded,” said Gowdy, who was not presentin the interview. “She answered all questions posed by Members and staff, and the Select Committee on Benghazi greatly appreciates her willingness to take the time to voluntarily appear before the committee, as well as her service to the United States over a number of years.”

“The information she provided will assist the committee in writing its final report,” he added.

Abedin has been Clinton’s trusted aide for several years. Married to former Congressman Anthony Weiner, Abedin has even drawn attacks from Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.

Earlier in the day, the committee’s top Democrat, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) said he thought the questions had been fair.

As the committee prepares for Clinton to testify, it has fought back charges that is was put together chiefly as a way to weaken the likely Democratic nominee. Clinton has long argued this, but fuel was added to the fire when House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) touted her lower poll numbers as a great success of the committee.

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton is a wretched human being who treats people like garbage when no cameras are around to captureher despicable behavior.

We know this courtesy Ronald Kessler, a former contributor for The Washington Post and current The New York Times bestselling author whose 2014 book, “First Family Detail,” provided an intimate glimpse into how Clinton treated the Service Service agents sworn to protect her.

In one especially nasty exchange cited in Kessler’s book, a Secret Service agent wished Clinton a good morning, only to get this in return: “F*** off!”

According to former Service Service agent Lloyd Bulman, Clinton was like this with pretty much everybody, but particularly so with law enforcement and military officials.

Clinton is such an obnoxious human being, in fact, that she demanded that military officials wear business suites instead of their uniforms while at the White House. Talk about a slap in the face to every man and woman who has ever served.

“When in public, Hillary smiles and acts graciously,” Kessler told National Review. “As soon as the cameras are gone, her angry personality, nastiness, and imperiousness become evident.”

He added that “Hillary Clinton can make Richard Nixon look like Mahatma Gandhi.”

Dealing with her antics was so painstakingly frustrating that agents considered “being assigned to her detail a form of punishment.”

“In fact, agents say being on Hillary Clinton’s detail is the worst duty assignment in the Secret Service,” Kessler maintained.

Unfortunately, many Americans — particularly the liberal ones — view Clinton differently, for two primary reasons: First, she excels at putting up a facade, and second, the liberal mainstream media is too cowardly to expose her.

And that is why it’s on us to make sure her true personality is revealed to the whole wide world.

Veteran FBI Agent’s Bombshell: Hillary Could Be Going To Jail For 10 Years

As the investigation into the “gross negligence” of Hillary Clinton’s handling of classified material continues, one anonymous FBI agent saysshe could be facing 10 years in jail under the Espionage Act.

The Act, according to the FBI agent, requires one who discovers the negligence to inform superiors. In the case of the alleged mishandling of classified documents and emails, Clinton would have needed to inform her only superior, the president, and he stated last week that he was not informed.

According to the Daily Mail, “Obama said flatly during a ‘60 Minutes‘ interview on Sunday that ‘No,’ he did not know Clinton sidestepped security protocols with her a home-brew email setup while she was his secretary of state.” Under conditions of anonymity, the FBI agent stated, “If investigators conclude that the former secretary [Clinton] was criminally careless in how she approached the security of the sensitive documents in her possession, then this part of the law could be used to prosecute her.”

According to the FBI agent, the investigation being conducted by the bureau centers on whether or not she violated the laws within the Espionage Act, specifically, “18 U.S. Code § 793– Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information.” The law applies to “any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense’ – even if it’s not considered classified.”

If Clinton knew that she was in violation of the Espionage Act, she was to have notified Obama immediately; and according to Obama, she did not inform the president.

Of course, Obama could use his presidential pardon to keep the former First Lady out of jail, but Obama hashistorically not used his presidential pardonto relieve politicians ofalleged wrongdoing. Obama’s use of the presidential pardon pales in comparison to his use of executive orders. In fact, according to The Nation, “While in the White House, Bill Clinton pardoned well over 100 people. So did President Bush. To date, Obama has pardoned less than two dozen and commuted even fewer sentences.”

In contrast to Obama’s lighter total of presidential pardons, he has used executive orders 221 times. In light of Obama’s supposed hesitancy to use presidential pardon, it seems likely that Obama will not bail her out with his pen this time.

The FBI Agents Investigating Hillary Are Furious With Obama, And Here’s Why

F.B.I. agents are reportedly angry over President Obama’s decision last Sunday to weigh in concerning their ongoing investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server.

Before the agency has had a chance to review over 30,000 of Clinton’s emails to determine if she mishandled classified information, the presidenttold60 Minutes, “I don’t think it posed a national security problem.” He went on to characterize her actions as a “mistake.” Obama also stated definitively, “This is not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered.”

The New York Timesreports, “Those statements angeredF.B.I.agents who have been working for months to determine whether Ms. Clinton’s email setup had in fact put any of the nation’s secrets at risk, according to current and former law enforcement officials.”

The White House backed off the president’s words the next day promising he is not trying to influence the outcome of an ongoing investigation. “There’s a debate among national security experts, as part of their ongoing, independent review, about how or even whether to classify sections of those emails,” said Josh Earnest, the White House press secretary. “But, as the president said, there is no evidence to indicate that the information in those emails endangered our national security.”

A spokesman for the F.B.I. declined to comment to the New York Times about the president’s remarks. But Ron Hosko, a former senior F.B.I. official who retired in 2014, said it was inappropriate for Obama to “suggest what side of the investigation he is on” when the F.B.I. is still investigating.

“Injecting politics into what is supposed to be a fact-finding inquiry leaves a foul taste in the F.B.I.’s mouth and makes them fear that no matter what they find, the Justice Department will take the president’s signal and not bring a case,” said Hosko, who maintains close contact with current agents.

Many, including Fox News’ judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano, havepointed outthat former CIA Director Gen. David Petraeus was indicted and convicted for offenses of a far less severe nature than Clinton’s decision to store classified information on an unsecured, private email server.

According to the Times, “The federal law used against Mr. Petraeus prohibits officials from knowingly taking classified information ‘with the intent to retain’ it at ‘an unauthorized location.’ A second, more serious charge makes it a felony to remove classified information through gross negligence. Officials at both the F.B.I and the Justice Department acknowledge that those laws set a high bar for criminal charges in the email case.”

During his60 Minutes interview, President Obama spoke directly to the intent component of the first crime, when he said that he had no impression Clinton purposely tried “to hide something or to squirrel away information.”

Clinton’s narrative regarding her email server has changedsince the New York Timesbroke the story in March. At a press conference at the U.N. that month, the former secretary of state said that she had not sent or received classified information on the server. When it was revealed during the summer that there were already numerous emails discovered containing classified information, she said that she had not sent or received any that were marked classified at the time.

Clinton has also stated that she turned over all work-related emails to the State Department, which hasproven to be false.

The former secretary of state is scheduled to testify before the House Select Committee on Benghazi on Thursday, where committee chairman Rep. Trey Gowdy is expected to ask her about these discrepancies.

The Western Center For Journalism: White House Confirms: We’ll Be ‘Scrubbing Laws’ To Gut The 2nd Amendment

“The White House Confirmed That [Barack] Obama Was Preparing A Series Of Executive Actions On Gun Control…” -Breitbart

Barack Obama is quietly preparing to do what you stopped Nancy Pelosi’s House of Representatives and Harry Reid’s Senate from doing for years now… and he’s going to do it by Imperial Decree.

Let’s keep it simple. Barack Obama, in spite of what he may believe, is not our dictator. He has no right or obligation to gut the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States by Executive Decree and it’s high time for Congress to draw a line in the sand and say: Enough is enough Mr. Obama, you’ve gone to far and you will go no further.

Use the hyperlink below to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership in the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives and to the Members of the Freedom Caucus in Congress.

We Will “Consider… Executive Actions That Could More Effectively Keep Guns Out Of The Hands Of [Those]… Who Shouldn’t Have Access To Them.” -White House Press Mouthpiece Josh Earnest

Just in case you have any doubt that Barack Obama intends to gut the 2nd Amendment by Imperial Decree, consider what White House Press Mouthpiece Josh Earnest said on the matter:

“It’s a high priority and will continue to be until we start to see more progress on this issue…”

And according to Breitbart, Earnest boasted that the Regime will “quibble with anyone who criticized” Obama for taking this course of action; and he further asserted“that the White House was working behind the scenes for more executive actions on guns,” looking at laws that can be “scrubbed,” and will “consider… executive actions that could more effectively keep guns out of the hands of criminalsand others who shouldn’t have access to them.”

“Others who shouldn’t have access to them”? By now, patriotic Americans should know that “others who shouldn’t have access to them,”in Obama-Speak, means law-abiding Americans, like you. By now, patriotic Americans should know that once Obama is done, criminals will be the only ones who are left with access to firearms… and it won’t be an unforeseen consequence… it will be by design.

Use the hyperlink below to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership in the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives and to the Members of the Freedom Caucus in Congress.

Politico reports: “Senate Democrats are gearing up for another gun-control push after the massacre at a community college in Roseburg, Ore., as the chamber’s top Democrat accused Republicans of being ‘puppets’ of the influential National Rifle Association in obstructing action on guns.”

In direct response to Reid’s Putsch, one prominent Republican leader immediately came out of the corner signaling a willingness to compromise and capitulate.

Senator John Cornyn said: “We’ll see whether the people who have no solution, who just want to keep talking about guns, are willing to meet us halfway… If somebody’s got a better idea, great. But if they’re just going to rail about guns and violence without offering solutions, that’s not good enough.”

For the record Senator Cornyn, here’s the correct response: ‘Harry, shut up.’

Of course, Reid has no intention of advancing legislation in the now GOP-controlled Senate. As the left-wing Politico puts it: “[U]nless they [Democrats] can force an amendment vote, the effort could end up being a messaging exercise.”

But“messaging”is exactly what Reid is doing and he’s doing it on purpose. Essentially, he’s providing Barack Obama political cover and softening-up the opposition; and if Cornyn’s comment is any indication, Reid is definitely getting the job done.

And Hillary Clinton is getting into the act as well. According to the liberalWashington Post, Clinton put forth “a vow to use executive action as president… if Congress refused to act.”

And like Reid, she’s providing Barack Obama the Public Relations cover to implement his Imperial Decree. Earnest admitted as much when he told the press, “we certainly welcome the kind of debate that Secretary Clinton is continuing.”

Use the hyperlink below to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership in the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives and to the Members of the Freedom Caucus in Congress.

Obama Is Reaching The End Of His Reign Of Terror And His Time Is Short If He Is To Keep His Promise To Fundamentally Transform America.

Patriotic Americans have repeatedly blocked legislative attempts by Barack Obama and his minions to eradicate our 2nd Amendment rights, so Obama is throwing all caution to the wind and is going to attempt to implement it by Imperial Decree.

It seems so strange that we’ve fallen so far and fallen so fast as a nation. Years ago, we would have thought it inconceivable that the occupant of the Oval Office would attempt to violate our liberties and our sacred Constitution through sheer dictatorial behavior.

But, like a spoiled child, our elected officials have let Obama get away with so much… bit by bit and piece by piece; and with each small victory, Obama comes back with even more lawless, illegal and unconstitutional demands.

And now, he’s coming after the 2nd Amendment. He’s not going to let that pesky little document, called the Constitution, get in his way but, as far as we’re concerned, Obama has just broke the camel’s back with this last straw.

Here’s the bottom line. If you like your 2nd Amendment and want to keep your 2nd Amendment, then it’s up to you to take action. No one is going to do it for you… certainly not Barack Obama… certainly not Hillary Clinton… certainly not Harry Reid… and certainly not Republicans in Congress, unless they hear from you right here and right now.