Hi Paul,
I haven't looked at the document yet, but as this is referencing XSD 1.1 and
(I think) we are working with XSD 1.0 I'm not sure how useful this document
will be to us. I haven't looked into XSD 1.1 much yet either, but my
understanding is that it relaxes some of the UPAC restraints with regard to
wildcards, and this will make versioning much easier than with XSD 1.0.
Pete.
--
=============================================
Pete Cordell
Tech-Know-Ware Ltd
for XML to C++ data binding visit
http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx
(or http://www.xml2cpp.com)
=============================================
----- Original Message -----
From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
To: <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 9:33 PM
Subject: Guide to Versioning XML Languages using XML Schema 1.1
Dear WG,
The XML Schema WG have published a WG note:
"Guide to Versioning XML Languages using XML Schema 1.1"
[1]. This follows the "XML Schema Versioning Use Cases"
WG note [2].
I propose we should conduct a formal WG review of this
seemingly useful document and ensure that the concrete
schema examples within are covered by our patterns documents.
Furthermore this may be a document we can reference and is
likely to assist greatly in addressing our charter requirement
to consider patterns for versioning.
Paul
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xmlschema-guide2versioning-20060928/
[2] http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/xsd-versioning-use-cases/