"If a book be false in its facts, disprove them; if false in its reasoning, refute it.

But for God's sake, let us freely hear both sides if we choose." ...Thomas Jefferson

I guess I'm an Anti-Semite just like you.

1.If "semitism" is stealing your neighbor's land, destroying his house
and imprisoning and torturing his family, then yes, I am anti-semitic.

2. If "semitism" is committing terrible acts of violence and framing someone else for them, then yes, I am anti-semitic.

3. If "semitism" is compromising the USA government through blackmail and other threats, then yes, I am anti-semitic.

4.
If "semitism" is imprisoning millions of IMPOVERISHED and brutalized
people, cutting off all basic necessities for life, then yes, I am
antisemitic.

5. If "semitism" is taking billions in aid from the USA and then murdering Americans with impunity, then yes, I am anti-semitic.

6.
If "semitism" is ignoring all UN Resolutions critical of you and then
using the same UN to raise trumped-up charges against an INNOCENT
nation, then yes, I am anti-semitic.

7. If "semitism" is coercing
the USA government and fooling the American people into attacking an
INNOCENT nation, costing millions of innocent lives, including American
soldiers, then yes, I am anti-semitic.

8. If "semitism" is
attacking unarmed humanitarian ships in INTERNATIONAL waters, murdering
at least nine people, including an American, shot FOUR times in the
head, then yes, I am anti-semitic.

9. If "semitism" is thinking
that you are a master and superior race that has to answer to NO one,
least of all almighty God, then yes, I am anti-semitic.

10. If "semitism" is taking American tax dollars and then spitting in America's face, then yes, I am anti-semitic.

11. If "semitism" is suppressing any and all discussion of high crimes against humanity then yes, I am anti-semitic.

12. If "semitism" is constant lying and deception to achieve a goal that is illegal and immoral then yes, I am anti-semitic.

13.
If "semitism" is arming yourself to the teeth, threatening other
nations with attack AND attacking other nations because they are
supposedly armed to the teeth and threatening you, then yes, I am
anti-semitic.

14. If "semitism" is staging 911 with the help of
traitorous Americans in high positions of power, murdering over 3,000
innocent Americans so that the USA will attack your "enemies" blamed for
doing 911(and in the process blackmailing those same officials who
helped you pull off 911!) then yes, I am anti-semitic.

15. If "semitism" is calling anyone critical of you or revealing of your actions "anti-semitic" then yes. I am anti-semitic.

Author Unknown.

I would like to state not all Jews are part of the "BAD JEWS" mentioned on this website. The problem is they the (good Jews) are taking the heat for the bad actions of those Religious, Fanatic, Zionist Jews that have ruined this earth. I personally don't hate Jews but hate the actions of these bad Jews. That's why it so important they (good Jews) stand up and speak out.

Why are some Jews being singled out here if there are good and bad people everywhere?

I've personally been attacked by those in the Jewish community.
They've tried to ruin me financially, and have no problem getting the local police to kick me out of PUBLIC meetings.
All in the name of "CIVILITY"!
Gee... I wonder what they would do if they didn't like me.

What about the canisters of gas? No one
denies that Zyklon B was used to disinfect clothes and also buildings. Zyklon B
was one of the premier pest control agents in Europe
at that time. It was present in most of the concentration camps including those
that were not said to have had homicidal gas chambers in them.

The typhus epidemic that spread
throughout Europe during the war and also
spread through the camps called for stringent lice control procedures.

In his book, Auschwitz: Technique
and Operation of the Gas Chambers, published by the [Beate] Klarsfeld
Foundation and meant to refute revisivonists, Jean-Claude Pressac admits that
over 95% of the Zyklon B used by the Germans was used to disinfect. He assigns
only 5% to homicidal purposes. And this from a Holocaust supporter.

So what other proofs are offered?
Well, there's the usual pictures of sick inmates which proves the
ground-breaking thesis that people got sick at the camp. Once again I'll add
that nobody denies the typhus epidemic which resulted in many deaths.

AUSCHWITZ: AN EYE-WITNESS ACCOUNT

Somenew facts
about Auschwitz are at last beginning to make
a tentativeappearance. They are
contained in a recent work called Die Auschwitz-Lüge:EinErlebnisbericht von Theis Christopherson (The Auschwitz Legends:An Account ofhis Experiences by Thies Christopherson, KritikVerlag/Mohrkirch, 1973).Published by the German lawyer Dr. ManfredRoeder in the periodical DeutscheBürger-Iniative, it is an eye-witnessaccount of Auschwitz by ThiesChristopherson, who was sent tothe Bunawerk plant laboratories at Auschwitz
toresearch intothe production of synthetic rubber for the
Kaiser WilhelmInstitute.

In May 1973, not long after the appearance of
this account, theveteran Jewish
"Nazi-hunter" Simon Wiesenthal wrote to the FrankfurtChamber ofLawyers, demanding that the publisher and author ofthe Forward, Dr. Roeder, amember of the Chamber, should be broughtbefore its disciplinary commission.Sure enough, proceedings beganin July, but not without harsh criticism
evenfrom the Press,who asked "Is Simon Wiesenthal the new
Gauleiter of Germany?"(DeutscheWochenzeitung, July 27th, 1973).

Christopherson's account is certainlyone of the most important documents for a re-appraisal of Auschwitz.He
spentthe whole of 1944 there, during
which time he visitedall of the
separate campscomprising the large Auschwitz complex,including Auschwitz-Birkenau where it isalleged that wholesalemassacres
of Jews took place. Christopherson, however, isin nodoubt that this is totally
untrue. He writes: "I was in AuschwitzfromJanuary 1944 until December 1944.

After the war I heard aboutthe mass murderswhich were supposedly perpetrated by the
S.S.against the Jewish prisoners,
andI was perfectly astonished.Despite all the evidence of witnesses, all
thenewspaper reportsand radio broadcasts I still do not believe
today in thesehorribledeeds. I have said this many times and in
many places, but to nopurpose. One is
never believed" (p. 16). Space forbids a detailedsummary hereof the author's experiences at Auschwitz,
which includefacts about camp
routineand the daily life of prisoners
totallyat variance with the allegations
ofpropaganda (pp. 22-7). Moreimportant are his revelations about the
supposedexistence ofan extermination camp. "During the whole
of my time at Auschwitz,lnever observed the slightest evidence of mass gassings.

Moreover,the odour ofburning flesh that is often said to have hung overthe camp is a downrightfalsehood. In the vicinity of the maincamp (Auschwitz
I) was a large farrier'sworks, from
which thesmell of molten iron was
naturally not pleasant" (p.33-4).
Reitlingerconfirms that there were five
blast furnaces and fivecollieriesat Auschwitz, which together with the
Bunawerk factories comprisedAuschwitz
III (ibid. p. 452). The author agrees that a crematoriumwouldcertainly have existed at Auschwitz,
"since 200,000 peoplelived there,
and inevery city with 200,000 inhabitants
therewould be a crematorium.
Naturallypeople died there -- but
notonly prisoners. In fact the wife ofObersturmbannführer A. (Christopherson'ssuperior) also died there" (p. 33).
Theauthor explains: "Therewere no secrets at Auschwitz.
In September 1944 acommission ofthe International Red Cross came to the camp
for an inspection.

They were
particularly interested in the camp at Birkenau, thoughwe also hadmany inspections at Raisko" (Bunawerk section, p.35). Christopherson points outthat the constant visits to Auschwitzby outsiders cannot be reconciled withallegations of mass extermination.When describing the visit of his wife to thecamp in May, he observes:"The fact that it was possible to
receive visits fromour relativesat any time demonstrates the openness of the
camp administration.

Had Auschwitz been a great extermination camp, we would
certainlynot have beenable to receive such visits" (p. 27).
After thewar, Christopherson came to
hearof the alleged existence of abuilding with gigantic chimneys in the
vicinity ofthe main camp."This was supposed to be the
crematorium. However, I must recordthe
fact that when I left the camp at Auschwitz in
December 1944,I had not seenthis building there" (p. 37). Does this
mysteriousbuilding exist today?Apparently not; Reitlinger claims it wasdemolished and "completely burnt out infull view of the camp"in October, though Christopherson never saw
this publicdemolition.Although it is said to have taken place
"in full view of the camp",it
was allegedly seen by only one Jewish witness, a certain Dr.Bendel, and hisis the only testimony to the occurrence
(Reitlinger,ibid, p. 457). Thissituation is generally typical. When it
comesdown to hard evidence, it isstrangely elusive; the building was"demolished", the document is
"lost", theorder was "verbal".At Auschwitz
today, visitors are shown a small furnace andherethey are told that millions
of people were exterminated.

The SovietStateCommission which
"investigated" the camp announced on May12th, 1945, that"Using rectified coefficients . . . the
technicalexpert commission hasascertained that during the time that
theAuschwitz camp existed, the
Germanbutchers exterminated in
thiscamp not less than four million
citizens ..."Reitlinger's
surprisinglyfrank comment on this is
perfectly adequate: "Theworld has
grownmistrustful of 'rectified
coefficients' and the figure of fourmillionshas become
ridiculous" (ibid, p. 460). Finally, the account of Mr.Christopherson draws attention to a very
curious circumstance.The onlydefendant who did not appear at the Frankfurt
AuschwitzTrial in 1963 wasRichard Baer, the successor of Rudolf
Hössas commandant of Auschwitz.
Though inperfect health, he diedsuddenly in prison before the trial had
begun, "in ahighly mysteriousway" according to the newspaper;
Deutsche Wochenzeitung (July27th,1973).

Baer's sudden demise before giving
evidence is especiallystrange,since the Paris newspaper Rivarol recorded his
insistencethat "during the
wholetime in which he governed Auschwitz, henever saw any gas chambers nor believedthat such things existed,"and from this statement nothing would dissuade him.

In short,the Christopherson account adds to a mounting collection of
evidencedemonstrating that the giant
industrial complex of Auschwitz (comprisingthirtyseparate installations and
divided by the main Vienna-Cracowrailway line) wasnothing but a vast
war production centre, which,while
admittedly employing thecompulsory
labour of detainees,was certainly not a
place of "massextermination".