Pulses neglected for long

India has not been able to see a net increase in land under pulses cultivation since the 1960s. Though land under pulses cultivation has seen an increase in southern and central India, the gains made have been neutralised by the loss in cultivated area in the Indo-Gangetic belt. As a result, pulse production did not see a major boost for a large part of the past 60 years. Between 1970 and 2008, the production of pulses stagnated at 12-14 million tonnes. The per capita availability of pulses reduced from 61 g to 37 g in the past 60 years.

The scenario has improved a little in the past few years. The production of pulses has risen primarily due to the government’s efforts to strengthen seed production and distribution and the continuous increase of minimum support price. But this spurt in pulse production is not enough to meet the demand as the import of pulses has also seen a rise. The reason behind the decline in pulses production in the northern states is improved irrigation facilities, which allowed these states to grow water-intensive crops such as rice and wheat. These crops also give assured returns because they are procured by the government. Southern states, which were mostly rain-fed and where irrigation facilities are not good, started growing pulses. Development of heat-tolerant varieties such as JG11 (a chickpea variety) also helped.

“JG-11 had changed the landscape of pulses production in south India,” says A Amarender Reddy, principal scientist, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI). Another reason behind this shift from north to south was a pest. “The attack of pod borer pest is frequent in the Indo-Gangetic plain and causes major losses. Scientists are still trying to find a way to deal with it,” says C Bharadwaj, a scientist at IARI’s Pulse Research Centre.

Course correction

Increasing production of pulses in the country can happen either by increasing land under pulses cultivation or by using better quality seeds. But there are major structural issues and demand-supply gaps. The problem begins with the assessment of seeds required by the states. This is done at the panchayat level by an agriculture officer. But their assessments are mostly a rehash of the assessments done in previous years. So, on the basis of these incorrect assessments, the states place their orders with the National Seeds Corporation of India (NSCI). When farmers are supplied with seed varieties they don’t wish to grow, they resort to sowing seeds they had saved from previous year’s yield.

Studies say that new seeds should be sown every three years or the yield goes down. This seed replacement ratio (SRR) in the country is currently more than five years. “These assessments are made three years in advance. For instance, the assessment for 2019 will be made in 2016. States need to stick to their plans to get a good produce,” says S S Singh, head of Crop Improvement Division at the Indian Institute of Pulses Research (IIPR).

There is another major reason—centralised seed production. States in India had their own seed farms catering to regional demands. But these were making losses and were merged with NSCI in 2013, which now supplies seeds to all the states in the country.

Experts say that though seed production has increased threefold in the past eight years, there is still a shortage of 50,000 tonnes of seeds. Sanjeev Gupta, director, National Project on Pulses Seeds, IIPR, says that only a decentralised model of seed production is suited for a country as large and climatically diverse as India.

Measures recommended

But all hope is not lost. India can substantially increase its area under pulses and across the country. Experts say that between the rabi and Kharif seasons there is a window of opportunity (October-December) to cultivate short-duration pulses. “India has 6.7 million ha of rice fallow land (land that has been left uncultivated after the rabi crop of rice) which can be used to grow pulses. This is already being done in West Bengal, where chickpea and lentils are being grown. We need more short-duration varieties,” says Bharadwaj.

To replicate such cropping patterns, the government needs to make the production of pulses lucrative. Unlike rice and wheat, the government does not procure pulses, leaving farmers dependent on the vagaries of the market. “If the government decides to start procuring pulses, it would give a big boost to production. It should be made a part of the public distribution system (PDS),” says A Narayanmurthy, Professor, Alagappa University, Tamil Nadu. However, Ramesh Chand, director, National Institute for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, says that every problem cannot be solved through public procurement. “The government should think of encouraging private players and contract farming, and provide competitive markets for pulses like it does for milk.”

S N Pandey, a former scientist who works with Delhi-based non-profit Development Alternatives, says that the market supply chain of pulses is quite long and unorganised—farmer to small traders, commission agents, wholesale dealers and retailers before reaching consumers. “In this process, the profit margin of farmers shrinks. This needs to be looked into,” he adds.

Apart from a long supply chain, Reddy raises another important issue. He says that in the past three years, the government has been ordering import of pulses in the months of July and August. The delivery takes around three-four months. When the imports arrive in November-December, the market is already flooded with pulses produced domestically. This brings down the prices and the farmers suffer. If we face crop losses in March-April, the import order should be placed immediately after the loss. “If the government does not devise a proper strategy, farmers will shift to other crops. This is already happening in Andhra Pradesh, where farmers growing chickpea have shifted to cotton farming,” says Reddy.

(The author is a reporter with Down to Earth. Views expressed are strictly those of Down to Earth.)