Have you ever seen David Fincher’s Zodiac? I didn’t see it when it first came out – I think I saw it for the first time maybe two years ago. I was absolutely BLOWN AWAY. I think it might even be David Fincher’s finest film, and I’m saying that as a big fan of Seven and The Social Network (but not so much The Game, Fight Club and The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo – solid films, but not my favorites). At first, I thought Zodiac was going to be an interesting character study and period piece about what went down in San Francisco in the 1970s when the Zodiac Killer was prowling around. But what Fincher created was so incredibly creepy and get-under-your-skin terrifying, simply because the viewer becomes completely enmeshed in the world of the film.

Zodiac is full of great performances, mostly by Mark Ruffalo (an SFPD detective tracking Zodiac) and Jake Gyllenhaal (a cartoonist and amateur cryptographer obsessed with the Zodiac case). But there’s also a ballsy, intense supporting performance by Robert Downey Jr. as a beat journalist at the San Francisco Chronicle. The film was before RDJ’s giant Hollywood comeback in Iron Man – this was done in the years when RDJ was sober, but still trying to prove himself to establishment Hollywood. Here’s something I didn’t know about Zodiac: it was shot on digital film (a misnomer, etc). And in a new documentary, Fincher described how RDJ was unaccustomed to the kind of rapid filmmaking pace of a digital film… and how RDJ “protested” by leaving jars of urine around the set:

David Fincher says in Keanu Reeves’ doc on filmmaking, “Side By Side,” that Robert Downey Jr. was so peeved about putting in long hours on “Zodiac,” he left jars filled with urine around the set, in protest. (Fincher’s use of digital cameras meant less time for breaks.) Reeves unveiled his movie at MoMA on Thursday. He said at the Tribeca Film screening he wasn’t above begging to land interviews with Fincher, Christopher Nolan, James Cameron, Martin Scorsese and George Lucas.

Keanu’s documentary actually sounds incredibly interesting – the Wall Street Journal has a great piece about it here. As for RDJ and the mason jars full of urine… gross. Maybe I just don’t get it because I’m a girl. There have been so many times when I wished I could just pee standing up, or just be able to go without having to make a pit stop in the bathroom. But mostly… I’m really glad I’m not a boy. Boys are GROSS. Ugh, mason jars.

I’ve never been a big RDJ fan. He’s a talented actor, and I admire him for getting through his addiction, but in general I’ve always thought he seems like a bit of a douche. Which this story kinda just confirmed.

Also, didn’t Tina Fey write about guys at SNL doing the same thing? (Urinating in jars, that is, not doing it in protest.)

Yes, I’m w/you Maya. So, RDJ had to actually put in days of hard work w/not so many breaks due to cinematic technological breakthroughs that now speed up the process of film making….& so he leaves jars of his urine to “protest?” To me, he’s a passive-aggressive QUEEN.

A couple years ago I read a “group interview” he was a participant in w/some other big-name actors like Brad Pitt and Mickey Rourke. In that interview RDJ was talking “all bad-ass,” trying to come across as manly, brash, etc.

Now I know that he goes on blind item websites, participating in “informing” readers of the truth about some Hollywood icons, which, at first I thought was pretty brazen.

Now, I read about this insanely passive behavior of his…leaving jars of his own urine to “protest,”…..really?! The picture is now forming in my mind that this guy (RDJ) has a good many resentments, & instead of going back to his old habits/coping skills of using drugs, he’s learned “new coping skills” to handle himself when he gets upset (going on blind item sites, leaving his urine around a set), which leaves me w/the distinct impression that this dude doesn’t have much of a backbone.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m SO GLAD he’s not using anymore….I’m VERY proud of him. But…..just my humble opinion…he’s still got some growing up to do….doesn’t make me respect him, for sure.

I love Zodiac too! I don’t understand how it got so many mediocre reviews. I think it was interesting, unsettling and well-acted (actually I found RDJ especially great.) Definitely one of Fincher’s strongest films, almost on par with Fight Club, the Social Network and Se7en and SO much better than The Game or The Curious Case of Benjamin Button.

I agree, a great movie that should have been received much better. I think all the performances in it are quite good – one of my favorite Jake Gyllenhaal roles. Ruffalo, Downey and Brian Cox are fantastic.

Thanks, Eve! I just got off work, & am going to look that one up in the online catalog of my local library! I honestly don’t know what I’d do w/out my library card. The libraries here in my county are THE BEST, & I liken it almost to a membership to Netflix or something….almost any movie I can think of, they have on DVD.

Ruffalo rocks in Zodiac! This post made me laugh. I love RDJ but he’s an entitled ass much! In RDJ’s defence though, Fincher is not an easy man to work with. He’s supposedly a major A-class douche to work with. He’s especially infamous for retakes. Makes actors redo shots 90 times or so is the count. Might as well fluke 89 times if Fincher insists on 90 takes per shot and get the last one right!

Wasn’t Fincher the director that made Jake cry because of the repeated takes of the same scene? Maybe not literally cry, but I thought Jake said something a year or so ago whining about his frustration with the number of takes he had to withstand in a movie. Which is ironic, because I think it’s one of Jake’s better screen performances.

This just makes me like David Fincher more, in general. It’s hard for me to feel bad for a bunch of over-paid pretty people who play pretend for a living.

I loved Ruffalo in In the Cut. He was also really good in a film he did with Joaquin Phoenix that I can’t think of right now.

I find RDJ’s behavior specially irritating considering he was trying to rebuild his image. How tempting it must have been to do a little drug testing after he so accomodatingly provided the specimen – perhaps a force of habit?

I am starting to wonder how much truth is to this story. Maybe Fincher is just trying to change his reputation as a well known megalomaniac a**hole, and exaggerating stories to save his face. Wasn’t there a blind about him and Rooney Mara. Perhaps he was mad because nobody wanted to blow him on Zodiac. Regarding RDJ – I think he did Iron Man right after Zodiac. I doubt the producers would have hired him if they found out he was behaving like an idiot on the set of his recent movie. Either that or they were understanding because everybody knows Fincher is a huge d**k.

Ruffalo talked about his experience on Zodiac some time ago on some round table, and he said something like he was hoping Fincher was going to fire him during production, because the actors had to do up to 80 takes to satisfy Finchers idea of framing and composition. Of course that doesn’t justify RDJ urine “pranks” but I somehow always got the impression that he (Fincher) is a pain in the a** to work with.

Don’t forget Gyllenhaal who had quite a few problems with Fincher’s intense schedule and infamous 100 takes per shot.

I know people think most actors are babies but shooting in digital probably enabled Fincher’s obsession with shooting the simplest shot over and over again. It must have worn them out, not to mention kill their self esteem seeing as he sometimes would have actors deliver a line a ton of times just to delete the shots right away and have them start over.

Fincher is known for this actually. And I highly doubt either Ruffalo nor RDJ need that many takes to give good performance. BS! The way Mark told the story I got the impression that this was the first and the last time he would work for Fincher. Anyway who knows what REALLY happened on set. Sounds a lot of actors are -pissed- by the “almighty” Fincher.
The video can be seen herehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4dOfWu-8RA

Eh, lots of pearl-clutching over nothing. I was in the car a couple weeks ago when my friend stopped at a convenience store. His friend and I were stuck in car sitting in the parking lot and his friend really had to take a piss.
Before I knew it he was peeing in an old green tea bottle. I tried to make small talk because it was kind of awkward but he just snapped “No talking!”. lol! Guess he was concentrating?
He left the bottle on the back window of my friend’s car, who thought it was tea.
This story is really gross but honestly, it made me laugh my ass off at the time. Growing up with a big bro, I guess I have a pretty high tolerance for dudes playing with their own piss. *shrugs*

I can’t speak for Kaiser, obviously, but my problem with the movie was the end. I thought it was great-taut, suspenseful, well written-right up until the end, which I felt just cheapened the whole movie and its concept. Kinda like Vanilla Sky, another movie that I loved but which ultimately disappointed me with its too “look how neatly we wrapped this up!” ending.

Gross! I agree with the spoiled Malibu kid who doesn’t know what a Gulag is. I also think he needs to cut down on the coffee. He’s always in Starbucks and Coffee Bean on the Westside. I’ve seen him so many times it’s scary. He’s usually really tan and always really short. He and I have that in common.

While leaving urine jars about isn’t quite as gross and immature as p*ssing in your director’s tea–and then bragging about it–like Kate Beckinsale, I still find it to be pretty disappointing behavior from an actor I admire. Now Beckinsale, on the other hand, I’ve disliked ever since.

Zodiac was a great film! I didn’t even realize it was a David Fincher movie until reading this article. I just happened to catch it on t.v. a while back and I got scared/blown away with how chilling and awesome the movie was.

I didn’t need to know about urine in jars though but guys are kinda gross that way haha.