On 14-05-2012 08:03, Pat Hayes wrote:
>
> On May 13, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>
>> Hi Ivan,
>>
>> On 13 May 2012, at 16:15, Ivan Herman wrote:
>>> it looks to me that Sandro's draft document:
>>>
>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/d96c16480e42/rdf-spaces/index.html
>>>
>>> would be a good way to 'settle' things (see [1]), too.
>>
>> Sandro's draft takes explicit position on a *all* issues, many of which are highly controversial. By bundling non-controversial and controversial issues all into one big package, this blocks progress on the sub-issues where we actually seem to all agree. So I repeat:
>>
>>
>> PROPOSAL: The abstract syntax for working with multiple graphs in RDF consists of a default graph and zero or more pairs of IRI and graph. This resolves ISSUE-5 (â€œnoâ€