Jury Sides With Johnson & Johnson in Talcum Powder Lawsuit

ST. LOUIS — A St. Louis jury on Friday rejected a Tennessee woman’s lawsuit that Johnson & Johnson baby powder contributed to her ovarian cancer, a victory for the company after it lost three previous, similar lawsuits in St. Louis, according to the Associated Press.

The jury voted 11-1 to deny damages to Nora Daniels, 55, of Columbia, Tenn., who said she used Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder from 1978 to 2013, when she was diagnosed with ovarian and uterine cancer. She also sued Imerys Talc, a talcum powder supplier, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported.

The verdict for Johnson & Johnson came after three previous St. Louis juries awarded a total of $197 million to plaintiffs who made similar claims. About 2,000 state and federal lawsuits are in courts across the country over concerns about health problems caused by prolonged talcum powder use.

Daniels’ lawyer, Jim Onder, said he thinks the difference between Friday’s verdict and the three previous St. Louis cases was that this jury didn’t think the powder contributed to Daniels’ specific type of cancer.

Juror Luke Wilson, 34, of St. Louis, said the jury did not think evidence linking talcum powder with ovarian cancer was strong enough to require Johnson & Johnson to put warning labels on its products.

The only dissenting juror, George Stair, 76, of St. Louis, said he thought there was enough evidence.

“I wish we could have sent a message to Johnson & Johnson to put a warning on the product label,” he said.

Our No-Fee Promise On Talcum Powder Lawsuits

You can afford to have our great team of lawyers on your side. When you choose us, it literally costs nothing to get started. We promise you in writing: