Business Administration
Management
International Relations
Economy
International Trade

20 Ocak 2013 Pazar

Theory and Practice of China

People's Republic of China pose a threat
to the United States could become a power level and the poles of the many
possible polar worlds would be the most important claims that have engaged in
the academic community for a long time.On
the issue this claim is more understandable in terms of making the camp a few
important ideas, let's talk. One of them is a more aggressive attitude with
every step taken by China's future to threaten the status quo following the
rise in the future and the economy began to find expression in a military
sense. On the other hand, the West China's progress will become increasingly
integrated and that rate is a pacifist who expresses their opinion on the
direction of the existing circles. Similarly, none of these options in the
Chinese domestic politics, winning is losing power, we see that from time to
time groups hailed the reforms of Deng and subsequent economic restructuring
and similar circles close to the reformist movement in the camp, largely on the
effectiveness of the second idea.

China, however, that the above-mentioned
possibilities, and the threat to the U.S. public perception of effort or to
create a new rising power of China as the characterization of the basic
problems. Already been established and the strength of the PRC and East Asian
politics and has already proven to be a regional power that the basic forces
are ignored. Therefore, as a result of a sudden glow and glare is reflected as
a force to be curious about which path to follow. China is to us a more
realistic reading of history in East Asia during the Cold War between the
US-USSR and the PRC of a triangle is already an active player in the Soviet
'step by step with the reduction in the power of leadership in the region shows
that the step announced. China is a serious military threat against the United
States even if the regional is for those hoping to keep in mind there are
theoretical points.

One of these proposed land power and sea
power while balancing the geopolitical structure of the schools, which would
give birth to another of the stability of the neorealist school of two-pole
systems.In 1975 the United
States withdraw its forces from Thailand and the Philippines 1991'te
particular, is very close relations with China and South Korea, Cambodia,
Japan-based threats, even as close as possible to keep its relations with China
as a result of the perception of the region due to terrestrial possible to say
that the superiority in China. On the other hand, the United States, Singapore,
Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei are able to use facilities in which naval forces
agreements with countries such as the domination of the sea is quite strong. Therefore,
more adventurous of the two powers will threaten the dominance in their regions
exhibit an attitude that such a move away from providing for their own success
in terms of interests-even if it is possible to-date price wars in the land
forces of domination is hardly surprising given the owner of the domination of
the sea will be high.

On the other hand, Kenneth Waltz’s
stability caused by the bipolarity argument that gained the most effective
voice in the region not far from the tension of these two fundamental forces,
but predicts serious conflict that the two forces would last a life as
possible, so far away to confirm this attitude. So recently a Chinese regional
power capable of maintaining the same density, the stability of not more than
one exam is a serious economic power in East Asia and China, leaning on other
continents can see that the effort to increase the effectiveness. U.S.
unipolarity as a requirement of this process and to avoid aggressive discourse
of regional powers will play a key role to continue the policy of giving
freedom of movement.