it's analog because it requires two people. although they
use digital technology, the critical switch from channel to
channel is always done by a person who trusts the other
person will be able to detect the switch and continue the
conversation on the new channel.

a man uses zero or more personal communication devices each
of which enables realtime exchange of digital information,
such as a pager, a radio, a cellphone, email, telnet, ssh,
and many other ways to communicate electronically.

part of the conversation is conveyed in one channel, and
part of the conversation is conveyed in another. The switch
between channels is initiated by one person and detected by
another person.

The more people do this, the more our encrypted messages
will be indecipherable to anyone except the intended target.
This is because the resources required to record, analyze,
and act upon information becomes exponentially more
expensive with each additional channel. A wiretap is less
compelling in court if it only contains 10 percent of the
conversation which is spread across nine other channels,
none of which are available.

The more people do this, the more difficult it is for ANY
oppressors to abridge our rights to freedom of speech.

When you're ready to join, just start using multichannel
analog encryption with your friends until you're good at it.

Here's an example:

email:
how are you?

chat response:
i'm excited! I discovered a really cool and simple way to
encrypt ordinary conversations.

sms:
great news. how easy is it to break?

cellphone:
it's less easy to break the more people use it.
do you want to go to lunch?

facebook chat:
sure, now would be a great time to take a break.

twitter:
It'S 2:48! I forgot to eat lunch. Leaving now.

A well-crafted conversation on classified subjects could be
conveyed just as easily as this trivial lunch example. Feel
free to use this technique to encrypt whenever you need just
one more layer of security.