maven-dev mailing list archives

Oh. I saw that. I guess I read more into it. I had this crazy idea that
someone was thinking of using jackrabbit as their Maven repository.
Actually, making Jackrabbit into a repository isn't a bad idea at all.
In any case, it seems what you are saying is that there is simply a
choice in whether to fix the existing implementation vs switching to
mercury.
Ralph
John Casey wrote:
> http://www.nabble.com/WebDAV-deploying-bug-with-Maven-2.1.0-M1-to19673500.html
>
>
> Admittedly, not a real healthy discussion, but IMO it might be
> worthwhile to discuss. The jackrabbit implementation is new as of
> 1.0-beta-3 (really beta-4, since beta-3 is badly broken), and mercury
> has been under a LOT of development lately, and I know folks are
> putting quite a bit of effort into testing and documenting it...so it
> seems like it might be a better way to go.
>
> We have to fix MDEPLOY-85, and that means at a minimum a new release
> of wagon-webdav-jackrabbit...at that point, we have an opportunity to
> make a decision about which webdav to use.
>
> BTW, we should also talk about a "pointer" wagon-webdav project that
> could simply house a relocation section that points to the current
> preferred wagon webDAV impl artifactId. This is a bit of a problem in
> beta-4, according to some people I've talked to, since the old
> wagon-webdav is no longer available.
>
> -j
>
> ---
> John Casey
> Developer and PMC Member, Apache Maven (http://maven.apache.org)
> Member, Apache Software Foundation
> Blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/buildchimp
>
> Ralph Goers wrote:
>> I don't recall seeing a discussion on jackrabbit vs mercury. Do you
>> have a link?
>>
>>
>> John Casey wrote:
>>> I'm stuck in assembly-plugin mode for the moment, but if you want to
>>> move forward with it, go ahead. FWIW, we also need to put the 2.1
>>> release plan to a vote, particularly given the little bit of
>>> discussion we've had over jackrabbit vs. mercury.
>>>
>>> ...all things I haven't had time to clear off my to-do list for the
>>> last week or two.
>>>
>>> -john
>>>
>>> ---
>>> John Casey
>>> Developer and PMC Member, Apache Maven (http://maven.apache.org)
>>> Member, Apache Software Foundation
>>> Blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/buildchimp
>>>
>>> Brett Porter wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Is anyone opposed to moving forward with a (likely much shorter)
>>>> 2.0.10 release cycle with what is already on the branch now?
>>>>
>>>> Was anyone already planning to do this?
>>>>
>>>> - Brett
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Brett Porter
>>>> brett@apache.org
>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org