A SpaceX Falcon 9 FT rocket will launch the 10th Dragon spacecraft on the eighth operational cargo delivery mission to the International Space Station. The flight is being conducted under the Commercial Resupply Services contract with NASA. Delayed from Aug. 13, Sept. 2, Jan. 3, Feb. 7 and March 20.

There will be a landing attempt. We shall see whether it is on the landing pad or the ASDS. I expect SpaceX to try for an ASDS until they get it done.

There is also a commercial satellite launch tentatively planned for April.

There will be a landing attempt. We shall see whether it is on the landing pad or the ASDS. I expect SpaceX to try for an ASDS until they get it done.

Click to expand...

I disagree. I think the value to them of a re-usable booster is very high, and unless the mission requires a sea landing, they'll go for land again. They didn't expect SES-9's booster to be a success, but I think their confidence on a normal (lower re-entry speed, fuel margin) ASDS landing is already quite high.

Also, there might have been damage to OCISLY that will take more than a couple of weeks to repair. I guess we'll find out.

I disagree. I think the value to them of a re-usable booster is very high, and unless the mission requires a sea landing, they'll go for land again. They didn't expect SES-9's booster to be a success, but I think their confidence on a normal (lower re-entry speed, fuel margin) ASDS landing is already quite high.

Also, there might have been damage to OCISLY that will take more than a couple of weeks to repair. I guess we'll find out.

Click to expand...

You make an excellent point. I suppose SpaceX has to decide how big a priority it is to get the ASDS landings working. They will certainly have plenty of opportunities for future attempts in the coming year. My thinking was that they really want to get it down before the Falcon Heavy test. If they get the landing down that is three full cores they will be able to save. I seem to remember reading an article saying that SES is willing to buy from SpaceX using a used booster.

Why they are attempting to land on the ship, though not directly at sea !!!!!
I don't understand

Click to expand...

SpaceX is trying to reduce the cost to get into orbit. Their plan is to reuse their main booster by having it land, either on land near the launch site or, if that is not possible because of fuel or too much speed, land on a floating platform called the ASDS. The ASDS can be placed in the ocean where it is needed depending on where the rocket needs to go. SpaceX has successfully made a landing on the ASDS once. That rocket was still lost when a support leg failed to lock and it toppled over after the successful landing.

The booster is a significant part of the cost of the rocket. The rocket is probably around $50 million complete and the booster is probably half of that cost at $25 million. The fuel for the booster costs around $200,000. Recovering the booster and reusing it apparently can reduce the cost to LEO by 30%. How many times a booster can be reused is something that will be learned over time. The more it is reused the lower the overall cost to orbit will be.

The overall goal according to Elon is to make the cost for a trip to Mars around $1000 per pound. That will allow a colonist to afford to emigrate to Mars. The idea is if you make costs reasonable enough then people will emigrate and a colony can be formed on another planet. That protects the human race from an extinction event occurring on Planet Earth.

The booster is a significant part of the cost of the rocket. The rocket is probably around $50 million complete and the booster is probably half of that cost at $25 million. The fuel for the booster costs around $200,000. Recovering the booster and reusing it apparently can reduce the cost to LEO by 30%. How many times a booster can be reused is something that will be learned over time. The more it is reused the lower the overall cost to orbit will be.

The date has been bumped out to April 8th. I'm reading that this delay is not SpaceX's fault. This probably has more to do with the fact that Orbital delayed their resupply run recently and NASA and the ISS has rules for docking times.