He clearly does not believe in the bible, but was using it as a tool, a weapon to bludgeon Christian teens, in some odd effort to try and convince
them to come his way. I believe that was the point I was trying to make.

I never said he believes in the bible. he was using it to point out the hypocrisy in people that use it to condemn homosexuality. I already explained
that a hundred times.

If you have nothing against homosexuality and gay marriage, then why are you still saying he was using the bible to bash people.

You must be lying, cause if you really feel that way you have to agree with what he did with the bible, cause he was right in his criticism.

You would only feel that he was misusing the bible if you have something against gays and gay marriage, and if you are a bigot.

So what is it, do you feel he was misusing the bible, which means you are anti gay and a bigot?

Or do you feel he was right in his criticism, using the bible to show the hypocrisy in christians that are using it to condemn gay people?

These are the only two options.

You either have nothing against gays and gay marriage, and agree with his actions talking about the bible.

Or you are against gays and gay marriage, don't approve his use of the bible, and are a bigot.

the Christian religion and faith is the largest theistic belief system on the planet... Islam follows right behind it and we all know what Islam and
Muslims think about Gays and them trying to use Marriage as a word to define "sin" to us and them.

Sharia law, the law that is popular to hate, and rightfully so, is based on Talmudic law, "The Jewish Law" that is based on the Torah which the
Bible shares it's first five books, or the books of the law with, specifically Leviticus.

Interesting how that works, the Radical Muslims are damned for wanting sharia law when it is the same as the "laws" said 'christians' what to
impose on others, such as homosexuals from Leviticus, while ignoring other parts that they find inconvenient.

Obviously this guy is Pro gay (either gay or not isn't the point) him bashing against christanity is against Christianity and its major campaign
against homosexuals. Real christians could care less about this situation, obviously this guy sees spiritual people one sided, religious, which is
anti gay in the simplest perspective

No student was bullied, cause the students you are refering to were not present, they had walked out and were gone.

Some suggest the walk-out was pre-planned.

I'd say - - that is probably true.

The STUDENTS were CALLED names by a LOUD ABUSIVE meathead behind their BACKS
The rest in attendance should have showered him with rotten fruit and vegeables.
BUT he already had so much EGG on his puss it wasn't nessessary.
Leave the CHILDREN out of THIS.

Excuse me? Spreading bigotry? You are barking up the wrong tree here. You may think you can "read between the lines" of people's postings, but you
cannot prove what someone has not posted. Let's review what has happened. Savage ripped into the bible, some Christian students were offended by it,
even some gay conservatives demanded an apology, which I also posted yesterday, and Savage made a feeble apology. Today it is all over YouTube, the
Blaze, Breitbart, and numerous other blogs in the blogosphere.
oops last part meant for another one.

edit on 30-4-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)

edit on 30-4-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason
given)

Anyone who condones, or uses the bible in a selective manner to spread hate and abuse on anyone, is guilty of spreading bigotry, you qualify.

Here is a partial explanation of the view of the Catholic church on the tradition of marriage from the Catholic Encyclopedia.

That Christian marriage (i.e. marriage between baptized persons) is really a sacrament of the New Law in the strict sense of the word is for all
Catholics an indubitable truth. According to the Council of Trent this dogma has always been taught by the Church, and is thus defined in canon i,
Sess. XXIV: "If any one shall say that matrimony is not truly and properly one of the Seven Sacraments of the Evangelical Law, instituted by Christ
our Lord, but was invented in the Church by men, and does not confer grace, let him be anathema." The occasion of this solemn declaration was the
denial by the so-called Reformers of the sacramental character of marriage. Calvin in his "Institutions", IV, xix, 34, says: "Lastly, there is
matrimony, which all admit was instituted by God, though no one before the time of Gregory regarded it as a sacrament. What man in his sober senses
could so regard it? God's ordinance is good and holy; so also are agriculture, architecture, shoemaking, hair-cutting legitimate ordinances of God,
but they are not sacraments". And Luther speaks in terms equally vigorous. In his German work, published at Wittenberg in 1530 under the title "Von
den Ehesachen", he writes (p. 1): "No one indeed can deny that marriage is an external worldly thing, like clothes and food, house and home, subject
to worldly authority, as shown by so many imperial laws governing it." In an earlier work (the original edition of "De captivitate Babylonica") he
writes: "Not only is the sacramental character of matrimony without foundation in Scripture; but the very traditions, which claim such sacredness for
it, are a mere jest"; and two pages further on: "Marriage may therefore be a figure of Christ and the Church; it is, however, no Divinely instituted
sacrament, but the invention of men in the Church, arising from ignorance of the subject." The Fathers of the Council of Trent evidently had the
latter passage in mind.

Just about all I have seen from you is criticism of other Christians. I am beginning to wonder if you are as you say you are, a devout leader of a
Christian youth group. You seem to be to be more of the pretend Christian. Just my opinion. I may change my view when I see you stop bashing other
Christians. In fact, your entire approach seems to me to be more that of a follower of the Dan Savage cult.
What was that name of that Christian youth group you lead? Do you have a website or a chat forum, or is it more an informal gathering in a church or
home?

Who is the one using the bible in a selective manner to spread hate? It's Savage and you know it.

The STUDENTS were CALLED names by a LOUD ABUSIVE meathead behind their BACKS The rest in attendance should have showered him with rotten fruit and
vegeables. BUT he already had so much EGG on his puss it wasn't nessessary. Leave the CHILDREN out of THIS.

Lies, he said their REACTION was pancy assed, which it was. he didn't call them names at all. If you going to be a loudmouth yourself, at least be
factual.

Ever enjoy a ham and cheese sandwich? That is a real bad double whammy! Pork, and meat with dairy!

Do you yourself follow anything in the bible or do you just use it the way Savage does, to bludgeon people and point out their flaws? Have you studied
the lives of the canonical Saints and read any of their treatises? Have you read Origen or Tertullian? Or do you just "cherry pick" a few things which
appear to you to be goofy and then use it to insult others?

The original logo contains the words "blood" and "fire", and I thought I would mention that there is both a mainstream meaning and a meaning
referring to bloodlines of the Illuminati. When discussing blood in Christian terms, it usually means the "body and blood of Christ" which I am sure
you know. When discussing secret societies, it can refer to the bloodlines of the 13 families of the Illuminati.

You can see that the Rothschilds are one of the 13 Illuminati bloodline families.

The term "fire" can relate to "the trial by fire", the fiery element in Chinese philosophy, the fiery salamanders of the elemental kingdom as
related in the Theosophical Society and the Findhorn Garden, or the etheric plane in esoteric philosophy, or the fire of the holy spirit, the fire
infolding itself. alexismincolla.com...

Utterly off topic and trollish again. Start a thread of your own if you wish, this is not the place, unless your intention is to derail this thread.

No more than you buddy. Again, where can I find your website or chat group or support group? Did you not brag about how you are so morally above the
fray when you said you work for the Salvation Army? It never occurred to you that the Salvation Army has a reputation for being a tool of the
Rothschilds.

in sheer numbers and Majorities yes I am, they are also the same theistic belief system called Monotheism which includes Judaism.

Yes, all the Abrahamic faiths, which share Leviticus, Sharia law is based on Leviticus, but I am willing to bet the world that you would be one of the
loudest screamers if someone wanted to impose sharia law on you, very hypocritical of you.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.