Justice is action in accordance with the requirements of law. It is suppose to ensure that all members of society receive fair treatment. Issues of justice arise in several different spheres and often play a significant role in causing, enabling, and addressing discord. The goal of the Justice System is to try to resolve and satisfy all these issues for the members of society. Injustice can lead to dissatisfaction, and/or rebellion. The different spheres express the principles of justice and fairness in their own way resulting in different types and concepts of justice. This paper will take a closer look at three justice theories based on our textbook "Moral Issues in Business", by William H. Shaw and Vincent Barry. I will then use these various theories to create an argument for a topic that will later be defined. (Shaw, Barry, 2004) (Beyond Intractability, 2003)

Utilitarian Justice

As suggested by philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill.

The Utilitarian theory of justice promotes social well-being or happiness. It's a system that wants to bring more good to society than any other system. However, it depends on various social, economic, and political facts. A utilitarian must understand the various possibilities, then determine their consequences and assess what options may be available. (Shaw, Barry, 2004)

Utilitarianism is a moral theory which claims that the right action is whatever action brings about the most utility of all the possible actions. Utility is a measure of what is valuable, and John Stuart Mill claims that the only thing which has inherent value is the happiness of individuals. Happiness is defined by Mill as pleasure minus pain, but this is not limited to physical pleasure and pain. Every person's happiness counts equally. So, the right action in a situation is the action whose consequences contain the greatest sum of future happiness that it is possible to create from that situation. (Shaw, Barry, 2004) (Utilitarianism, 2005)

The utilitarian theory suggests that an action is just if it is in accord with the correct principles of justice. These principles will demand that people be given what they are due, and that they be treated equally. People are due what they have a moral right to, but these moral rights are ultimately determined by what set of rules would maximize utility if they were accepted and enforced by a given society. In other words, justice is respecting rights which are defined by their utility. A part of this will be treating people equally, where the type of equality is also determined by what maximizes utility. Nevertheless, an action which follows these principles and is just, may fail to maximize utility. (Shaw, Barry, 2004), (Utilitarianism, 2005)

The Utilitarian theory I believe presents numerous problems in its conception, most of which lie in the fact that the theory oversimplifies many aspects of human life. It would make life very easy and simple if all we had to worry about was causing the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of people. However, this gives no protection to the rights of the minority or individual, nor does it allow for the ideal of Justice. (Shaw, Barry, 2004), (Utilitarianism, 2005)

The Utilitarian theory suggests that morality is nothing more than the attempt to bring about as much happiness as possible to as many people as possible. This means that every person's happiness is weighed evenly. However, if there are more people to be made happy by an event or decision, then those in the minority, no matter how many or how close in numbers to being the majority will have to suffer unhappiness. (Shaw, Barry, 2004)

I would like to use an example involving the recent Presidential election. There are two men running for President, John Kerry and George Bush. If those voting in favor of Kerry are fewer in number than those voting in favor of...

YOU MAY ALSO FIND THESE DOCUMENTS HELPFUL

...there is no greater question or importance than the relationship between the state and that of an individual. John Rawls directly addresses the issue in his famous work “A Theory of Justice”, in which he offers a comprehensive argument for an active welfare state. Rawls offers a framework based in the context of social contract theory that appears both logical and egalitarian; his conclusions appeal to both intuition and reason almost undeniably....

...The conventional accounts of Justice normally begin by
stating a fundamental rule of Aristotle – Justice is to treat
equals equally and unequals unequally, and that unequal
treatment should be in proportion to the inequality. In
everyday life though, justice is seen as an attribute of law,
while all laws are not necessarily just. Many great socio-
political movements of the world have focused from time to
time on unjust laws eg Apartheid laws...

...Theory of Justice Analysis
Jearline Berry
CJA 530 Ethics in Justice and Security
January 17, 2010
Eddie Keon, Instructor
Theory of Justice Analysis
The Theory of Justice Analysis, to talk about theory of justice you need to know what crime analysis is to ensure that the current justice analysis is in place accordingly. Crime analysis is an...

...Compare and contrast Rawls’ theory of justice with Hayek’s version of freedom. In doing so please outline and justify which theory provides a better explanation
Friedrich Hayek was a British philosopher who wrote from his experiences of World War one in which he served. It is known that based on Hayek’s experience in the war and his desire to help avoid the mistakes that had orchestrated to the war; he was led to this career in which he developed...

...philosophy of John Rawls with regard to the theory of societal justice. My aim is convey Rawls’ conception of justice. I will discuss his original position of equality and how the essential veil of ignorance collaborates with the original position to arrive at a societal ground zero. I will also address the two principles that Rawls believe would emerge from the original position to guide a just society.
Rawls aspires to investigate and present a...

...Professor Wills
Justice
The Statue of Lady Justice is often placed in front of a courthouse. Lady Justice has often been described wearing a blindfold and holding a scale and a sword. The blindfold represents that justice is measured without favor or identity. The balance represents fairness and equality. The sword represents punishment. Lady Justice symbolizes that all people are equal in the eyes of the law. Some...

...Rawls Theory of Social Justice: How decisions are made to benefit all. “Until the great mass of the people shall be filled with the sense of responsibility for each other's welfare, social justice can never be attained” (Helen Keller).This quote suggests that social justice can be attained with the involvement of the many.
Social Justice can be defined as fair and proper administration of laws and natural laws, that all...

...plan for health care reform follows the guidelines and principles of philosopher John Rawls’ theory of justice. John Rawls teachings and writings were and still are extremely relevant in the world of political philosophy. Now, the view of many opposing philosophers is that justice should be given based on merit, and this is also the tendency in modern society. Rawls, however, proposed a theory that justice should be based...

Study Tools

Company

Follow

{"hostname":"studymode.com","essaysImgCdnUrl":"\/\/images-study.netdna-ssl.com\/pi\/","useDefaultThumbs":true,"defaultThumbImgs":["\/\/stm-study.netdna-ssl.com\/stm\/images\/placeholders\/default_paper_1.png","\/\/stm-study.netdna-ssl.com\/stm\/images\/placeholders\/default_paper_2.png","\/\/stm-study.netdna-ssl.com\/stm\/images\/placeholders\/default_paper_3.png","\/\/stm-study.netdna-ssl.com\/stm\/images\/placeholders\/default_paper_4.png","\/\/stm-study.netdna-ssl.com\/stm\/images\/placeholders\/default_paper_5.png"],"thumb_default_size":"160x220","thumb_ac_size":"80x110","isPayOrJoin":false,"essayUpload":false,"site_id":1,"autoComplete":false,"isPremiumCountry":false,"userCountryCode":"US","logPixelPath":"\/\/www.smhpix.com\/pixel.gif","tracking_url":"\/\/www.smhpix.com\/pixel.gif","cookies":{"unlimitedBanner":"off"},"essay":{"essayId":33061834,"categoryName":null,"categoryParentId":null,"currentPage":1,"format":"text","pageMeta":{"text":{"startPage":1,"endPage":12,"pageRange":"1-12","totalPages":12}},"access":"premium","title":"Theories of Justice","additionalIds":[],"additional":[],"loadedPages":{"html":[],"text":[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]}},"user":null,"canonicalUrl":"http:\/\/www.studymode.com\/essays\/Theories-Of-Justice-102633.html","pagesPerLoad":50,"userType":"member_guest","ct":10,"ndocs":"1,500,000","pdocs":"6,000","cc":"10_PERCENT_1MO_AND_6MO","signUpUrl":"https:\/\/www.studymode.com\/signup\/","joinUrl":"https:\/\/www.studymode.com\/join","payPlanUrl":"\/checkout\/pay","upgradeUrl":"\/checkout\/upgrade","freeTrialUrl":"https:\/\/www.studymode.com\/signup\/?redirectUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.studymode.com%2Fcheckout%2Fpay%2Ffree-trial\u0026bypassPaymentPage=1","showModal":"get-access","showModalUrl":"https:\/\/www.studymode.com\/signup\/?redirectUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.studymode.com%2Fjoin","joinFreeUrl":"\/essays\/?newuser=1","siteId":1,"facebook":{"clientId":"306058689489023","version":"v2.8","language":"en_US"},"analytics":{"googleId":"UA-32718321-1"}}