It is amazing how ignorant all you liberals are about the law itself.....How is this law discriminative?????????????? It isn't it. It just says a person of religion has the right to have his day in court if he is being forced or discriminated against to do something against his religious belief... Levin said made a analogy that was spot on.....Would all you liberals be okay with forcing a Orthodox Jew OBGYN doctor in performing abortions without having his day in court? Or a Muslim restaurant from being forced to serve bacon without their day in court? Instead all you idiots keep spouting the same nonsense you hear on TV without even knowing the facts......READ THE LAW YOU FOOLS!

Then Clinton with Kennedy and Schummer made bad law............. You are so fucking ignorant it is frighting....Please dont breed.

Click to expand...

If you read the link provided, you didn't obviously, you'd have seen how very different these laws were in this case. Next time take your own advice and don't parrot right-wing dogma from Fox and Pence.

It is amazing how ignorant all you liberals are about the law itself.....How is this law discriminative?????????????? It isn't it. It just says a person of religion has the right to have his day in court if he is being forced or discriminated against to do something against his religious belief... Levin said made a analogy that was spot on.....Would all you liberals be okay with forcing a Orthodox Jew OBGYN doctor in performing abortions without having his day in court? Or a Muslim restaurant from being forced to serve bacon without their day in court? Instead all you idiots keep spouting the same nonsense you hear on TV without even knowing the facts......READ THE LAW YOU FOOLS!

Then Clinton with Kennedy and Schummer made bad law............. You are so fucking ignorant it is frighting....Please dont breed.

Click to expand...

If you read the link provided, you didn't obviously, you'd have seen how very different these laws were in this case. Next time take your own advice and don't parrot right-wing dogma from Fox and Pence.

Click to expand...

I have read the law you fucking dummy. I dont need to a idiot that lies to tell me what I have read.

the Civil Rights Act of 1964 runs contrary to the spirit of the Constitution. All the rhetoric of "the government shall not" that is contained in the Bill of Rights. If a Black man owns a business and he chooses not to serve Whites...that's his call and same with a White owner and Blacks. Now bear in mind you will lose that revenue and possibly your capital investment. If you serve all the people then you will have more business and more revenue. that's just simple economics.

the Civil Rights Act of 1964 runs contrary to the spirit of the Constitution. All the rhetoric of "the government shall not" that is contained in the Bill of Rights. If a Black man owns a business and he chooses not to serve Whites...that's his call and same with a White owner and Blacks. Now bear in mind you will lose that revenue and possibly your capital investment. If you serve all the people then you will have more business and more revenue. that's just simple economics.

Click to expand...

So how come it has passed constitutional muster more than once?

Click to expand...

It was approved by the court because SC judges are hand picked stooges who do what their benefactors put them on the court to do, especially in the case of libturd judges. The idea that any legal principle is involved is pure sophistry.

You and your ilk think government gets to decide who businesses must serve, not the supporters of the Indiana law.

Click to expand...

The supporters of the law met in private with Pence to sign the abomination because they are a gaggle of nut bags....and if the public saw them they would go "duuude"

Click to expand...

How does that disprove what I posted?

Click to expand...

because the law represents not "we the people" but special interests including nut bag fundamentalist Christians....there are Christian groups opposed to this crazy shit...

Click to expand...

We can all read the plain text of the law. Who wrote it does not determine whether it serves "we the people." Furthermore, the function of law is to protect your individual rights, and you have no right to be served by anyone.

Dred Scott was the law of the land - so it must have been right - yes?

Have you ever read the 14th Amendment? I'm sure you have not, leftists are repulsed by the Constitution. But log on the Soros hate site that you generally go to to be programmed, and ask a handler to download your thoughts on the 14th to you. Then see if you can identify WHO the provision provides protection from?

Hint: It is the same actor that the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 5th provide protection from.

the Civil Rights Act of 1964 runs contrary to the spirit of the Constitution. All the rhetoric of "the government shall not" that is contained in the Bill of Rights. If a Black man owns a business and he chooses not to serve Whites...that's his call and same with a White owner and Blacks. Now bear in mind you will lose that revenue and possibly your capital investment. If you serve all the people then you will have more business and more revenue. that's just simple economics.

Click to expand...

So how come it has passed constitutional muster more than once?

Click to expand...

It was approved by the court because SC judges are hand picked stooges who do what their benefactors put them on the court to do, especially in the case of libturd judges. The idea that any legal principle is involved is pure sophistry.

Click to expand...

Our Supreme Court is a conservative court. Just because they don't believe in anarchy like you do is not a reflection on the court

The bottom line: government enforced Jim Crow. It was the result of private businesses being allowed to make their own choices about who to serve.

Click to expand...

Bottom line is the Government did not do this in a vacuum by itself...it did that on behalf of minds like yours that figure you are special and entitled and superior ...that was what Jim crow was for to give aid and comfort to creatures of contempt like you...

Click to expand...

The bottom line is that government did exactly what you want to do to Christians: use force against them to determine who they must serve. It was the result of your ideals, not mine.

However, it's cute how you are trying so desperately to blame me and private business for Jim Crow.

Useful Searches

About USMessageBoard.com

USMessageBoard.com was founded in 2003 with the intent of allowing all voices to be heard. With a wildly diverse community from all sides of the political spectrum, USMessageBoard.com continues to build on that tradition. We welcome everyone despite political and/or religious beliefs, and we continue to encourage the right to free speech.

Come on in and join the discussion. Thank you for stopping by USMessageBoard.com!