Thanks to Tamara Theresa and Steven Zakrzewski for the additional links provided at the end of the post.

Chris Gupta

...Health Canada "also told us thalidomide, asbestos and the blood supply were safe." Carrying similar risks of long-term lethality, and strangely just as legal, cellphone addiction mirrors the prestigious early allure of smoking ­ as well as an immensely profitable industry's steadfast denial of risk and responsibility. As poisonous as cigarette smoke and even harder to corral, the cellphone's "second-hand" microwave and to bystanders ­ ....

.... Roger Coghill became a long-standing advocate for health warnings to be affixed to cell phones after this biologist found that cellphone transmissions damage the ability of white blood cells to ward off infectious disease by disrupting the immune system's electromagnetic communications. Dr. Neil Cherry has measured accelerated aging, increased cell death and cancers caused by radio frequency microwaves from cellphones and their relay towers. With the brain's electro-chemical communications repeatedly zapped by lightning-like cellphone pulses, this Ph.D. biophysicist warns that headaches, fatigue, lethargy, nausea, dizziness, depression, arteriosclerosis and even Alzheimer's can result from frequent or prolonged calls on cell phones....

...."The risk is extremely high," declares Dr. Cherry. "There are 66 epidemiological studies showing that electromagnetic radiation across the spectrum increase brain tumors in human populations. Two of those studies are for particular brain tumors from cell phones."....
--------------------------

Though intended for renovations, Chris Anderson would like all visitors to deposit their cellular phones in the cement mixer by his front door. This sounds excessive ­ until you step into Anderson's orchard, where the pegged needle of a shrieking electromagnetic radiation (EMR) meter placed beside a connected cellphone still shows significant exposure 100 feet away.

Much to the chagrin of this certified EMR-mitigation specialist, every day some 300 million cell phone users are "reaching out and touching someone you love. Yourself, and anyone else within range of the microwaves emitted by your cell phone."

Mesmerized by magical gadgets, we have yet to count the costs of miniature radio transmitters that are transforming Marconi's invention into new possibilities for portable personal pollution. As entire nations reach for pocket communicators, the explosively emergent $40 billion a year cell phone industry is poised to deliver a "Wireless Revolution" that over the next five years is expected to double the one-billion people connected by telephone lines over the past century.

Silicon sensors are already calling to each other. Soon, countless communicating microchips embedded in everything from bumpers to brooms will be sending streams of encoded electrical energy through glass, steel, concrete, bone and flesh. Exquisitely sensitive to subtle electromagnetic harmonies, human brains and bodies as intricate as galaxies depend on tiny electrical impulses to conduct complex life-processes ­ including the ability to read, recall and respond to these words. Acting as antennas, our anatomies just as easily tune into spurious signals from radio and microwave transmissions. Blake Levitt, author of Electromagnetic Fields, says that when it comes to cellphones, "a worse frequency could not have been chosen for the human anatomy."

As cell phones conquer consumer minds and markets, researcher Carolanne Patton notes that "the brain reaches peak absorption in the UHF bands, right where cellular telecommunications operate." British military scientists have discovered that cellphone transmissions disrupt the brain sites for memory and learning, causing forgetfulness and sudden confusion.

Other studies show that electromagnetic signals from cellular phones reduce the ability to concentrate, calculate and coordinate complicated activities such as driving a car. Startled by $4 billion a year in extra claims among cellphone-wielding drivers, North American insurers did a double-take that found simply juggling `cell phones is not causing a 600% increase in accidents over other drivers busy shaving, applying makeup, tuning radios, taming pets, making out, pouring coffee, retrieving dropped cigarettes, talking and gesturing to passengers, or actually steering the vehicle.

Instead of just another dangerous distraction, tests conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy found that using a cell phone severely impairs memory and reaction times. "Hands-free" mobile speaker-phones cause even more crashes because they typically emit 10-times more brainwave interference than handheld units.

For all drivers dialing out on their cell phones, University of Toronto investigators report that the heightened probability of cracking up your car persists for up to 15-minutes after completing a call. That's comparable to the risk of crashing while driving dead drunk exclaims Dr. Chris Runball, chairman of the B.C. Medical Association's emergency medical services committee. Reeling from "dial-a-collision" costs, the government of British Columbia may join England, Spain, Israel, Switzerland and Brazil in restricting or banning the use of cell phones by drivers.

In New Zealand, cellphone towers are prohibited on school property because of possible health effects. But Health Canada regulations ignore the hidden hazards of cell-wrenching cellphones, which send pulsed signals through the skull in a process one expert likens to "jackhammers on the brain." "Safety Code 6" looks only at microwaves burning skin. "Basically, Health Canada claims if it can't cook you, it can't hurt you," says Walter McGinnis. "It's like saying cigarettes aren't dangerous unless they burn you."

One of a handful of licensed electricians who understand electromagnetic fields well enough to eliminate them from household wiring, McGinnis has been testing EMFs and collaborating with fellow testers and researchers for nearly a decade. In Victoria, where he has helped residents defeat six cellphone towers, there was dancing in the streets after Microcell Connexions withdrew its application to erect a microwave transmission tower against the Wishart Elementary School fence in the spring of 1998. Microcell spokesman Colin McCrae points out that emissions from the company's towers carry about the same energy as a 50-watt lightbulb ­ well within federal guidelines.

This is hardly reassuring, retorts the former president of the Wisehart parents advisory council. Tania Berenuik observes that Health Canada "also told us thalidomide, asbestos and the blood supply were safe." Carrying similar risks of long-term lethality, and strangely just as legal, cellphone addiction mirrors the prestigious early allure of smoking ­ as well as an immensely profitable industry's steadfast denial of risk and responsibility. As poisonous as cigarette smoke and even harder to corral, the cellphone's "second-hand" microwave and to bystanders ­ particularly children riding in cars that transmit amplified cellphone signals through their steel structure. Reporting the conclusions of a 12-person British study team, scientist Sir William Stewart told London's Financial Times that "children may be more vulnerable because of their developing nervous system, the greater absorption of energy in the tissues of the head and a longer lifetime of exposure."

Roger Coghill became a long-standing advocate for health warnings to be affixed to cell phones after this biologist found that cellphone transmissions damage the ability of white blood cells to ward off infectious disease by disrupting the immune system's electromagnetic communications. Dr. Neil Cherry has measured accelerated aging, increased cell death and cancers caused by radio frequency microwaves from cellphones and their relay towers. With the brain's electro-chemical communications repeatedly zapped by lightning-like cellphone pulses, this Ph.D. biophysicist warns that headaches, fatigue, lethargy, nausea, dizziness, depression, arteriosclerosis and even Alzheimer's can result from frequent or prolonged calls on cell phones.

"There is also a higher incidence of cardiac problems," Cherry comments, "in terms of the timing function in hearts. You get more heart attacks and more heart disease - it has now been shown in many studies." The biophysicist from Lincoln University in Christ Church, New Zealand has also found that cell phones can murderously modify moods. In brains and bodies seriously derailed by tiny imbalances in trace minerals and hormones, depression, suicide, anger, rage and violence can result when calcium and serotonin levels are disrupted by cellphone transmissions.

In 1995, Cell phone sales in North America exceeded the birth rate.
Hired by the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association to condone cellphones, public health scientist George Carlo found that rare tumors on the outside of the brain are more than doubled among cell phone callers ­ particularly on the right side of the head where `phones are usually held. Carlo told ABC's "20/20" that cell phone causes genetic damage that leads to cancer. Warning of "the potential for a global health disaster," ABC recommended "prudent avoidance" of cellphones after finding that every cellphone they lab-tested exceeded the Federal Communication Commission's standards for EMF absorption rates. EMF researcher Dave Ashton cautioned 20/20 viewers that because cellphones constantly search for the nearest repeating tower, "long-term damage comes from cell phones in the stand-by mode." Cell phone "shields" and headsets "cannot adequately address these problems," Ashton added.

Dr. Carlo later told London's Express newspaper that cellphones cause genetic damage following a dose-response curve. That is, the more a person uses a cell phone, the more cellular destruction and health risks they incur. Cell phone-confused cells can go crazy, Carlo cautioned. Experiments on captive animals show that this cumulative DNA damage is passed on to succeeding generations.

Addicted as we are to a culture of convenience, we forget how inconvenient it is to contract cancer. An Adelaide Hospital study confirmed Carlo's conclusions after finding B-cell lymphomas doubled in mice within 18 months of one-hour daily exposure to power densities experienced by a cellphone user. B-cell lymphomas are implicated in 85% of all cancers.

READY OR NOT
As magazine-size "cellular" relay antennas hidden in church steeples and rooflines keep popping up just about everywhere, more and more communities are declaring their airspace a "No Fry Zone". But in Canada, where cell phone towers come under federal jurisdiction, municipalities are only "advisers' to a process in which no permits are required to erect transmitter towers deemed necessary for "national security." Cellphones do save a lot of lives. FCC Chairman William Kennard reports that every day more than 98,000 people make 911 calls from wireless cell phones.

Many more lives are involuntarily imperiled by non-emergency calls. Pat Irwin was working in a Colwood health food store when she noticed a truck unloading metal framework. The next morning, a new cellphone tower was ready to add its emissions to another BC Tel tower already operating down the street. There had been no announcement, no public hearings ­ just a quiet notification to the municipality that a tower was going up, literally overnight.

The intruder radiated for a month when Irwin felt her immunity dropping. She wondered if other changes in her energy and menstrual cycle were "not from the moon or something that I ate."

Irwin also seemed more irritable after her central nervous switchboard began receiving round-the-clock cellphone calls. With cellular relay towers in Kansas and Oklahoma being shut down because they interfered with passing aircraft, Irwin sensed how the same transmissions plucked her own electrical circuitry, inflicting a "chronic edginess" that "twangs human nerves." Sleep disorders, she learned, are common among people exposed to high levels of electromagnetic pollution.

After several other women in the same business centre reported similar symptoms, Irwin quit her job. "I saw it as something that was there to stay and I'd be daily exposed to it over a long period of time," she told Alive. "All this stuff is what we're playing with on a daily basis, and we don't know the long-term health effects."

Implying recognized hazard, cell phone companies such as B.C.'s FIDO insist that the new digital phones operating at 1/50 the power of older analog models are safer. But there is nothing "safe" about the new 1.9 gigahertz broadcasting frequency. Much like a boxer taking repeated blows to the head, rapidly pulsing cellphones signal permanent brain damage. A study by Dr. Peter Franch found unequivocally that "cells are permanently damaged by cellular phone frequencies." This cellular damage, Franch noted, is maximized at low dosage  and "inherited unchanged, from generation to generation."

Attempting to explain a 25% increase in asthma and a 5% increase in asthma-related death rates throughout rapidly "mobilizing" metropolitan Sydney, Franch found that the production of histamine, which triggers bronchial spasms, is nearly doubled after exposure to mobile phone transmissions. Cellphones also reduce the effectiveness of anti-asthmatic drugs, and retard recovery from illness.

Katharina Gustavss, a certified Building Biology consultant with 25 years experience, explains that CDMA's 217 Hz spikes are very close to the frequencies of human cell membranes. Gustavss accompanied a Microcell technician to the Colwood microwave relay tower Irwin and others had complained about. When he waved a spectrum analyzer, Gustavss checked the display and saw "pretty scary" energy spikes. "What's that?" she asked the tech. "I've never seen that before," he told her. It turned out that this cellphone tower tester only set his meter to an averaging mode. Switching to "real time" froze the readings at "scary" maximum output levels.

How dangerous are cell phones? "The risk is extremely high," declares Dr. Cherry. "There are 66 epidemiological studies showing that electromagnetic radiation across the spectrum increase brain tumors in human populations. Two of those studies are for particular brain tumors from cell phones."

Cherry says that because cancer takes decades to develop, it will be another 10 or 20 years before "mobiles" manifest a big bonanza in brain tumors. But he adds, we're already seeing "acute effects that are noticed within minutes of using a cell phone."

After two minutes' conversation, a cell phone's digitized impulses disable the safety barrier that isolates the brain from destructive proteins and poisons in the blood. Professor Leif Salford, the neurologist who carried out the research for this finding, informed the Daily Mail: "It seems that molecules such as proteins and toxins can pass out of the blood, while the phone is switched on, and enter the brain. We need to bear in mind diseases such as MS and Alzheimer's which are linked to proteins being found in the brain."

DANCING WITH THE TELECOMONSTER
If you must pack a cell phone, treat it like a loaded pistol. Keep it turned off. Don't carry it near ovaries, testicles, or the heart. For partial protection, buy an antenna shield. Limit calls to one-minute, six to 10 minutes a month. Never fire off a cellphone with children anywhere in sight.

A better bet is to facilitate the growth of organic telephone networks with lots of fibre. Instead of more microwave towers, "We should be wiring up our cities with fibre-optic cables to provide Internet, fax, telephone, radio and television at very high quality," Cherry urges, "rather than saturating our cities with the microwave, radiowave and low frequency signals all the time."

When it comes to cells, consciousness and cell phones, every call is collect. How can convenience count more than cancer? What is gained by being in constant contact with disembodied voices, while being "out of touch" with the friends and neighbours around us? Are we comfortable having our location traced by monitoring authorities?

Unless we start voting with our wallets, consumer complacency could prove as species-limiting as corporate cynicism. "Microwave frequencies are the same as those used in radar and your microwave oven," says Florida cellphone tower opponent Joe Chwick. "You wouldn't think of sticking your head in the oven, but there is no hesitation to putting the cell phone to your ear."

Having somehow survived three-million years of evolution without them, many contemporary hominids claim they cannot live without them. But can exquisitely sensitive electromagnetic beings live with cell phones  and the cell phone towers their signals ride in on? Like polyethylene food and water containers, plastic cookers and coffeemakers, microwave ovens and petroleum-powered brilliantly beguiling inventions we have to let go. Would hanging up on such an intrusive and hazardous addiction be so terrible?

URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2005/02/15/grave_cell_phone_dangers_revealed.htm

Related Articles

Artificial Water Fluoridation: Off To A Poor Start / Fluoride Injures The NewbornPlease watch this short 5 minute video: Little Things Matter: The Impact of Toxins on the Developing Brain Toxins such as Arsenic, Lead, Mercury, Aluminum and other known and unknown chemicals, that are often above the legal limits, are deliberately added to our water to manage the disposal of toxic industrial waste chemicals under the pretense of “safe and effective” for water fluoridation mantra.Knowing and acting on the above should... [read more]December 30, 2014 - Chris Gupta

Drinking Water Fluoridation is Genotoxic & TeratogenicThis paper by Prof. Joe Cummins is a very important 5 minute delegation made to London Ontario Canada "Civic Works Committee" public participation meeting on January 25, 2012 on fluoride*. While a bit technical it is short and easy to grasp. A must read as it goes to the heart of the matter regarding the well established toxicity of fluoride which is well in all scientific circles even before water... [read more]February 06, 2012 - Chris Gupta

Democracy At Work? - PPM On FluorideHere is a commentary on the recent (Jan, 25th, 2011) Public Participation Meeting (PPM) on Fluoride in the City of London, Ontario. The meeting started with a strong pro fluoride stance form the City engineer. His lack of knowledge on chemistry of the toxic wastes used to fluoridate water could embarrass even a high school student never mind his own profession. He blatantly violated his "duty to public welfare" as... [read more]January 29, 2012 - Chris Gupta

Readers' Comments

I Hated this web page.!.!.!.....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!>.....

Posted by: Snotty Bugerface on March 9, 2005 11:08 PM

Very informative site!
Irene Murray

Posted by: Irene Murray on April 1, 2005 04:10 PM

Too scary to think about
I have been using a cell phone all day every day into the night for 12 or 13 years
AHHHHH not good not good at all

i got really freaked out reading this im only 15 and i have been using my cellphone every day for the last 3 years. even though i mainly only use it for texting can it still give out radiation? i always have it in my pocket, can that do damage to my ovaries? if i even have it with me now ill put it in my bag!!!! OMG this is so freaky i cant believe it!

Posted by: Katie on August 9, 2005 05:35 PM

Yes it can still do damage if it is on as it sends out a polling signal every so often. Keep it away from your body...

I would like to know if mobile phones are just as dangerous of they are not connected to a network????

Posted by: Shannon on August 14, 2005 09:50 PM

Shannon...get yourself protected from the serious danger of cell phone radiation with a revolutionary new product that neutralizes the radiation and renders it harmless to the body...go to www.myBIOPRO.com/atEyeLevel

GREAT site... keep up the good work keeping us informed as to the proper facts.

Thanks!

Posted by: njcomputerchick on November 18, 2005 01:07 AM

A cell tower just went up right outside my office building and I am very concerned about the health risks it may present. Fortunately, I have taken steps to protect myself, but wonder how it will affect the other employees who choose to do nothing?

For more information about cell phones and how you can protect yourself, please visit www.killercellphones.com

Whoa!! I knew that cellphones had emf radiation but I had no idea that it was nearly as far traveling for each unit. I was told a couple inches by the brochure on my phone and to hear that it is still significant at 100 feet is astounding. I am interested to find out if the EMF Harmonizers are actually effective enough to make them "safe" to use. More importantly, for the safety of my children and their future health.

Posted by: Buck E. on December 10, 2005 02:57 AM

WOW! im 24 and I been using a cell phone since I was 19 and I have had many headaches, felt irritable and found out I have T.M.J but I dont know how I got it, and for the past year and a half my cell phone bills say I use 10,000 mins a month last month I used over 20,000 im worried now, do ear pieces help any???

Posted by: Kurt on January 10, 2006 11:44 PM

All of these facts, and yet where I live, parents are handing out cell phones to their kids like candy. Question is, how do we get these parents to take this cell phone risk seriously?

Posted by: njcomputerchick on February 21, 2006 11:36 PM

i liked it
do you have any info on why people crash because of cell phones?

Posted by: patrick on February 28, 2006 08:29 PM

I would like to know if mobile phones are just as dangerous of they are not connected to a network????

this is so scary!!!! omg! my dad is totally against cell phones even though he has one. my mom says she wants me to have one but they wanted me to look up cellpones and their dangers so i did and im thinking that i shouldnt get one now all of my friends have cell phones! i can not belive how dangerous they are!

Posted by: jenna on June 29, 2006 04:14 PM

are we all going to die????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!oh nooooooooooooo!

Posted by: jenna...again on June 29, 2006 04:16 PM

I would like to know if mobile phones are just as dangerous of they are not connected to a network????

After sleeping on this for the night, I thought I should share positive information, beyond my tumors I think were caused by my early cell phone use.

Since I started using my BIOPRO chips on my computer, I am now able to be on the computer for hours. Before the chips, my eyes burned, blurred and I would have to get away from the computer after 30 minutes or less.

Cell phones are NOT the only EMF porducer. If your setting in front of your computer right now, you are being exposed to possible harmful effects of radiation.

Please protect yourself. If I can be of help or you want more information go to:

www.mybiopro.com/nurse2heal or e-mail me if you have any questions.

My e-mail is mitzrn@gmail.com

Again, Thanks for caring, listening and becoming your own best health advocate!
nurse2heal

I would like to know if mobile phones are just as dangerous of they are not connected to a network????

Posted by: tasha on October 12, 2006 05:47 PM

Thanks a lot for the information! I had to do some notecards for my 7th grade science fair and this site pretty much had ALL the information I needed about cell phones! Thanks agian guys.

Posted by: Alex Beiersdorfer on October 17, 2006 07:53 PM

I just moved away from the city,my bed was 30 feet away from a sprint tower on the roof, One month and i think sharper , my skin is better,and My cats are eating again. There is no doubt Cell phones kill,Several people in my building died of cancers and It seems to be a time cluster, starting with the roof lease. I believe from what I felt personaly It definately affects the digestive process , Possibly killing most of the live bacteria in your intestines,
We have to investigate the the more delicate living organisms that help us digest and fight infection ect. I swear to you, My quality of life improved in just 4 weeks away from the Tower of Death, The saddest part I feel in my heart is that 70 apartments + nearby private homes health is jepordized for a mere $2000 a month , They didnt even give people in the building the option to each pay the $30 (70 x 30=2100) to not have the relay,Most people probably wouldnt pay it anyway $1 a day is too much to pay to be cell tower free i guess, Needless to say, Me and my wife+ cats feel great and everyone in that building is a sour and neurotic, Glad I made it out alive, People say theyll sue if Its proven,...sure you and the world, You be in a class action lawsuit and get a $10 giftcard to Target Fools, Target wont stock anything for Brain Cancer, and If they started to It wouldnt be $10.
Ban Cell Phones, If your not a Emergency room Surgeon or Triage Nurse, Chances are
your just not important enough.
One last thing...My wife and I had even more intence pain at peak calling times
(after 8 pm and nights and weekends)not just a hunch.

Posted by: William on November 17, 2006 01:52 AM

I would like to know if mobile phones are just as dangerous of they are not connected to a network????

Posted by: rita on January 31, 2007 02:41 PM

I would like to know if mobile phones are just as dangerous of they are not connected to a network????

Posted by: Kat on February 27, 2007 01:48 AM

I would like to know if mobile phones are just as dangerous of they are not connected to a network????

Posted by: franco on April 25, 2007 10:09 PM

I would like to know if mobile phones are just as dangerous of they are not connected to a network????

We refer customers to a website of independant research articles by scientists who have studied our technology and validated it.This is available for public viewing.Our technology was researched and validated in leading medical establishments and universities from around the world.

my,god my god, why hast thou forsaken me.welcome to the insanely neurotic brave new world .the brainwashing and mind control that this represents borderlines on a supernatural level of evil.a malisious intent to control and bring serious health risks. who really is behind this? think about it?

I think cell phone dangers pose a serious risk. Check out this video that shows the radiation being measured…
http://emfreview.com/product-reviews/aircom.html
Parents of children have special cause to be concerned
T here ARE ways to protect ourselves (some more effective than others), and we should do what we can

With the world health org., and the international agency for research stating in 2011 that that there were risks for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer..why take the risk, so I tried to find a possible solution, to make things worst the consumers agency reported that protective products on the market do not work..then recently I found a possible solution for a new concept that uses military stealth technology, to block off 85 and more, I'll be doing testing and reporting as well, on my blog .http://to-know.site88.net/ ..no I'm not a scientist but a concern human and parent, and I do have the necessary testing equipment..

Posted by: Bob on April 5, 2012 09:30 PM

Name:

Email Address:

URL:

Comments:

Remember info?

Security code:

Please enter the security code displayed on the above grid

Due to our anti-spamming policy the comments you are posting will show up online within few hours from the posting time.

These articles are brought to you strictly for educational and informational purposes.
Be sure to consult your health practitioner of choice prior to any specific use of any of the non drug device or food based medicinal products referenced herein.