Take action for Liberty each and every day.
Support an open press. Teknosis' continued operation and existence crucially depends on your informative contributions, donation or paying forward, partnering with or purchase of items advertised here. Thank you.

Saint John Hunt re: E. Howard Hunt's JFK Assassination Confession | Interview on We The People with Jesse Ventura

Saint John Hunt: My Father's JFK Confession

Notorious superspy E. Howard Hunt's eldest son, Saint John Hunt, joins Jesse for a revealing interview about his father's career as a CIA agent and Watergate conspirator. Saint John speaks out on his father's shocking revelations to him about those responsible for JFK's assassination, as well as E. Howard Hunt's involvement in the Bay of Pigs and plots to kill Fidel Castro. Plus, new details about the mysterious death of Saint John's mother.

The greatest savings come from decreased emergency room visits, police calls, and court time. What isn’t counted, and significant, is the increase of business in areas where the homeless are vagrants. In addition, these studies show most participants find jobs and leave these programs.

A 2014 study in Florida reports taxpayers save over $20,000 per homeless person when they are provided basic services rather than languishing on the streets. An academic paper from two University of Pennsylvania professors document it’s more cost-effective to end homelessness than endure it.

The IRS’s inspector general confirmed Thursday it is conducting a criminal investigation into how Lois G. Lerner’s emails disappeared, saying it took only two weeks for investigators to find hundreds of tapes the agency’s chief had told Congress were irretrievably destroyed.

Investigators have already scoured 744 backup tapes and gleaned 32,774 unique emails, but just two weeks ago they found an additional 424 tapes that could contain even more Lerner emails, Deputy Inspector General Timothy P. Camus told the House Oversight Committee in a rare late-night hearing meant to look into the status of the investigation.

In a 2013 report, the inspector general said the IRS had improperly targeted conservative and tea party groups’ applications for nonprofit status, asking repeated intrusive questions and delaying their applications well beyond a reasonable time. Some of those groups are still waiting, with their applications now pending for years.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, Utah Republican and Oversight Committee chairman, said the ongoing investigations undercut President Obama’s assertion last year that there was no evidence of corruption in the IRS’s targeting.

“I have no idea how the president came to such a definitive conclusion without all the facts,” he said.

Privacy is a fundamental Right, and that Right is recognized in at least 2 Human Rights Treaties, which are elevated to supreme Law of the Land by the Supremacy Clause in the U.S. Constitution. Nevertheless, when the U.S. Senate ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, it appended a Declaration rendering that Treaty "not self-executing". This means that a private Citizen may NOT enforce that Treaty in any American Court at present, and the Department of Justice will not enforce that Treaty withOUT "implementing legislation" enacted by the Congress. Never mind that more than a dozen Acts of Congress already enable private rights of action for violations of Treaties e.g. Habeas Corpus statutes: 28 USC 2241, 2242 etc.

If you think that commercial software designed to spy on computers is problematic, you're not alone. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's UK contact has determined that Gamma International's approach to selling its FinFisher spyware violates human rights guidelines. The developer not only doesn't have a human rights policy, but doesn't investigate clients for the possibility of abuse -- there's little stopping it from selling FinFisher to an oppressive government. The contact couldn't confirm that Gamma sold its software to Bahrain, which used the surveillance tool to target the political activists who prompted the investigation (shown here). However, the OECD isn't shy about pressing for change. It wants Gamma to take evidence of abuse and government advice into account whenever it sells software, and to cooperate when there are signs that someone is using FinFisher for nefarious purposes.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the
peoplepeaceably to assemble, andto petition the Government for
a redress of grievances.

Hey Paul, my co-defendents in error took lawyers so jury disempaneled & adjourned till Nov 2 give them time. Was looking forward to winning next week, more time to focus. Will keep you posted, heading home tonight. Be well bro! Tom

If you think that anyone in DC is protecting Social Security, think again because they have been reducing it by pretending that inflation is less than half of what it really is since the 1980s.

Plus, the puppets in DC actually work for the banksters, and in 1913, the puppets in DC unconstitutionally delegated the U.S. Government's Constitutional power to print notes to the banksters who got obscenely rich and then used that power to impoverish the American people.

2. I have been paying Social Security taxes for 48 YEARS (since I was 15 y ears old. I am now 63).

3. My Social Security payments, and those of millions of other Americans, were safely tucked away in 'an interest bearing account' for decades until you political pukes decided to raid the account and give OUR money to a bunch of losers in return for votes , thus bankrupting the system and turning Social Security into a Ponzi scheme that would make Bernie Madoff proud.

4. Recently, just like Lucy and Charlie Brown, you and "your ilk" pulled the proverbial football away from millions of American seniors nearing retirement and moved the goalposts for full retirement from age 65 to age, 67. NOW, you and your"shill commission" are proposing to move the goalposts YET AGAIN .

5. I, and millions of other Americans, have been paying into Medicare from day one, and now"you" propose to change the rules of the game. Why? Because "you" mismanaged other parts of the economy to such an extent that you need to steal our money from Medicare to pay the bills.

6. I, and millions of other Americans, have been paying income taxes our entire lives, and now you propose to increase our taxes yet again. Why? Because you "incompetents" spent our money so profligately that you just kept on spending even after you ran out of money. Now, you come to the American taxpayers and say you need more to pay off YOUR debt.

7. Toadd insult to injury, you label us "greedy" for calling "bullshit" to your incompetence . Well, Captain Bullshit , I have a few questions for YOU:

1. How much money have you earned from the American taxpayers during your pathetic 50-year political career?

2. At what age did you retire from your pathetic political career, and how much are you receiving in annual retirement benefits from the American taxpayers?

3. How much do you pay for YOUR government provided health insurance?

4. What cuts in YOUR retirement and healthcare benefits are you proposing in your disgusting deficit reduction proposal, or as usual, have you exempted yourself and your political cronies?

It is you, Captain Bullshit , and your political co-conspirators called Congress who are the"greedy" ones. It is you and your fellow thieves who have bankrupted America and stolen the American dream from millions of loyal, patriotic taxpayers. And for what? Votes, your job and retirement security at our expense,you leech.

That's right, sir. You and yours have bankrupted America for the sole purpose of advancingyour political careers. You know it, we know it, and you know that we know it.

And you can take that to the bank you miserable son of a bitch .

NO, I did not stutter.

P.S. And stop calling Social Security benefits "entitlements". WHAT AN INSULT!!!!

I have been paying in to the SS system for 48years. It's my money-give it back to me the way the system was designed and stop patting yourself on the back like you are being generous by doling out these monthly checks.

EVERYONE!!!

If you like the way things are in America delete this.

If you agree with what a Montana citizen, Patty Myers, says, please PASS IT ON!!

___

Hey Deb,

Re: "My Social Security payments, and those of millions of other Americans, were safely tucked away in 'an interest bearing account' for decades..."

You can't make good assessments or good decisions based on false information. The Freedom movement is awash in garbage like the (below) post you forwarded.....probably spread by the governmentitself in order to keep the population running in circles instead of hanging politicians. It is dishonestand we do our fellow citizens (co-owners of the Republic) a huge disservice by not correcting this crap whenit comes our way.

'nuff said,

Jake

"A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes."

so that you will actually know what you are talking about ...... instead of taking someone else's word for it.

Jake

"Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it." ~~~ George Bernard Shaw

___

Drew:

Okay, , i understand that the FED was created in 1913, it's not a federal govt bank, it is a private bank , there was that secret meeting at the time on jeckell island in GA,,etc etc,,,i wikipediad the thing

Can someone tell me who(the real names) the Current private shareholders of this Bank are?? .....if its banksters, then who? Jamie Dimon? Lloyd Blankfein? that Rothschild dude?......anyone know the actual names of current beneficiaries of this FED Bank?

And the way these shareholders get paid is thru all the billions in interest of the US bonds/treasuries the FED has bought?

___

Mark A. Adams, JD/MBA:

Almost everything that everyone believes is bullshit. For instance, most people don't realize that the U.S. government has the Constitutional power to issue notes and coins, that it gave away that power to some crooked banksters in 1913, that they have been issuing notes which are not redeemable for anything from the government for decades, and therefore, that the whole debt could be eliminated by simply taking back the power to issue notes which was unconstitutionally and illegally given to banksters 100 years ago.

___

Drew:

Forgive me for asking , but could someone give me like three actual real names of these banksters?......so often i here this stuff about the Fed & 1913, but i cant give any real names of the beneficiaries/shareholders from back the in 1913 or now in 2015....

___

RD:

THE BOOK "THE CREATURE FROM JEKYLL ISLAND" WRITTEN BY ED GRIFFIN GIVES ALL THE NAMES THAT ATTENDED THAT MEETING IN 1913.

___

Mark A. Adams, JD/MBA:

Maybe Jake has that info. It is hard to find, but FDR's family was one of the original FED bankster families, and he stole our rights to enforce the law by passing the Federal Rules of Procedure which eliminated our right to petition for a redress of grievances by presenting evidence to grand juries and asking for an indictment and our right to trials by juries in civil actions by allowing a judge to grant summary judgment if he thinks that there are material no facts in dispute and one side should win without bothering with that quaint old jury trial.

Mark A. Adams, JD/MBA:

As I said earlier, it is hard to find that info. FDR's family was one of the original FED banksters as were the Rockefeller and Morgan families. I expect that Griffin's book or his web site may have some good info about who was involved, but I've never bothered to check into that as the FED's abuses are due to the theft of our rights by FDR to secure justice. If those rights were restored, then the FED wouldn't be able to abuse its power. Of course, the FED should also not be allowed to control issuance of U.S. notes, but I think that is far less important than the theft of our rights to petition for redress and to jury trials.

I don't recall the names. (For some reason, personal names don't stick with me very well unless I make a substantial effort to plant them in memory) Most were unfamiliar to me, with the exception of the surname "Rothchild". When you watch the video......write them down......and you'll be able to relay them to the rest of us.

The words "people of the United States" and "citizens" are synonymous terms, and mean the same thing. They both describe the political body who, according to our republican institutions, form the sovereignty, and who hold the power and conduct the government through their representatives. They are what we familiarly call the "sovereign people," and every citizen is one of this people, and a constituent member of this sovereignty.

[Dred Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 393 (1856)]

[emphasis added]

Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. And the law is the definition and limitation of power. It is indeed, quite true, that there must always be lodged somewhere, and in some person or body, the authority of final decision; and in many cases of mere administration the responsibility is purely political, no appeal except to the ultimate tribunal of the public judgement, exercised either in the pressure of opinion or by means of the suffrage. But the fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, considered as individual possessions, are secured by those maxims of constitutional law which are the monuments showing the victorious progress of the race in securing to men the blessings of civilization under the reign of just and equal laws, so that, in the famous language of the Massachusetts Bill of Rights, the government of the commonwealth "may be a government of laws and not of men." For, the very idea that one man may be compelled to hold his life, or the means of living, or any material right essential to the enjoyment of life, at the mere will of another, seems to be intolerable in any country where freedom prevails, as being the essence of slavery itself.

[Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886)]

[emphasis added]

In the United States***, sovereignty resides in the people who act through the organs established by the Constitution. [cites omitted] The Congress as the instrumentality of sovereignty is endowed with certain powers to be exerted on behalf of the people in the manner and with the effect the Constitution ordains. The Congress cannot invoke the sovereign power of the people to override their will as thus declared.

[Perry v. United States, 294 U.S. 330, 353 (1935)]

[emphasis added]

No discussion of sovereignty would be complete, therefore, without considering the sovereignty that resides in "US", the People. The Supreme Court has often identified the People as the source of sovereignty in our republican form of government. Indeed, the federal Constitution guarantees to every State in the Union a "Republican Form" of government, in so many words:

Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union aRepublican Form of Government ....

[Constitution for the United States of America]

[Article 4, Section 4, emphasis added]

What exactly is a "Republican Form" of government? It is one in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the People and exercised by the People. Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, makes this very clear in its various definitions of "government":

Republican government. One in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated. In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219; Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 22 L.Ed. 627.

The Supreme Court has clearly distinguished between the operation of governments in Europe, and government in these United States*** of America, as follows:

In Europe, the executive is almost synonymous with the sovereign power of a State; and generally includes legislative and judicial authority. ... Such is the condition of power in that quarter of the world, where it is too commonly acquired by force or fraud, or both, and seldom by compact. In America, however, the case is widely different.Our government is founded upon compact. Sovereignty was, and is, in the people.

[Glass v. The Sloop Betsey, 3 Dall 6 (1794)]

[emphasis added]

I have no doubt that those born in the Territories, or in the District of Columbia, are so far citizens as to entitle them to the protection guaranteed to citizens of the United States** in the Constitution, and to the shield of nationality abroad; but it is evident that they have not the political rights which are vested in citizens of the States. They are not constituents of any community in which is vested any sovereign power of government. Their position partakes more of the character of subjects than of citizens. They are subject to the laws of the United States**, but have no voice in its management. If they are allowed to make laws, the validity of these laws is derived from the sanction of a Government in which they are not represented. Mere citizenship they may have, but the political rights of citizens they cannot enjoy until they are organized into a State, and admitted into the Union.

[People v. De La Guerra, 40 Cal. 311, 342 (1870)]

[emphasis added]

The people of the United States***, as sovereign owners of the national territories, have supreme power over them and their inhabitants. ... The personal and civil rights of the inhabitants of the territories are secured to them, as to other citizens, by the principles of constitutional liberty, which restrain all the agencies of government, state and national; their political rights are franchises which they hold as privileges in the legislative discretion of the congress of the United States**. This doctrine was fully and forcibly declared by the chief justice, delivering the opinion of the court in National Bank v. County of Yankton, 101 U.S. 129.

[Murphy v. Ramsey, 114 U.S. 15 (1885)]

[italics in original, emphasis added]

All territory within the jurisdiction of the United States* not included in any State must, necessarily, be governed by or under the authority of Congress. The Territories are but political subdivisions of the outlying dominion of the United States**. They bear much the same relation to the General Government that counties do to the States, and Congress may legislate for them as States do for their respective municipal organizations. The organic law of a Territory takes the place of a constitution, as the fundamental law of the local government. It is obligatory on and binds the territorial authorities; but Congress is supreme and, for the purposes of this department of its governmental authority, has all the powers of the People of the United States***, except such as have been expressly or by implication reserved in the prohibitions of the Constitution.

With All Rights Reserved I offer my sincere apologies for not being able to make Whangarei District Court this 23rd day of February 2015, I am simply too ill to attend, as confirmed by a Medical Doctor.

Therefore, my appearance (special) by way of documents is attached as follows:

1. Deed of Power of Attorney to Marcellus-Rex de Pavelly to speak on my behalf in this matter (Marcellus will present the original Deed in Court)

2. Actual and Constructive Notice of Requirement of Due Process to Judge KB de Ridder presenting my Agreement with the Commissioner and a further letter from Dr Twentyman on my medical condition.

3. Actual and Constructive Notice of Agreement of the Parties Between Naomi Fergusson, Commissioner of Inland Revenue and Thomas Joseph Brown February 18, 2015

4. Medical letter of February 18, 2015 from Dr Twentymann which in conjunction with the previously presented medical letter of January 22, 2015 further evidences medical reason for my physical absence.

5. Suicide over Tax article, The Truth January 22, 2009; for notice of the Court of non-statutory IRD "dirty tricks" contributing to my late wife's suicide and their subsequent ongoing unlawful harrassment of myself, which has contributed significantly to my present ill state of health.