David,
On 06/04/2009, at 9:41 AM, David Hughes wrote:
>> And for those people out there who have a historical allocation and
> are not APNIC members? (must be a stack of those).
My understanding of the email from James was that this included
historical allocations, which now attract a $1350/year minimum fee?
Reading through this document it seems to be like it's basically a fee
hike all over the place, in reasonably large proportions. I hope no
one is a non-member. :)
Can anyone clarify if IPv6 fees are now separate? With the membership
tiers they are sortof "joined" which made alot of sense to me, if you
had a /21 you could hold a /32 of IPv6. I can see that being a
migration barrier for smaller businesses and hosts? Having to pay
thousands more for IPv6 space would make people more hesitant to
experiment IMHO.
Some-one please tell me I've completely missed the mark? :)
Trent
>>>> David
> ...
>> On 06/04/2009, at 11:37 AM, James Spenceley wrote:
>>> Hi MMC,
>>>> " 1.1 IPv4 Fees
>> In the case of IPv4 address holdings the annual membership fee is
>> calculated according to the member’s total IPv4
>> address holdings, including historical and APNIC-allocated address
>> space, as follows: "
>>>> So yes it does now include historical allocation (provided they are
>> administered by APNIC and not another RIR).
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> --
>> James
>>>> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
>AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog>