Mit106
Remember your history
Back in the 1970s and 80s, cybernetic experts in Kyiv and Moscow using system dynamics modeling, predicted the collapse of the Soviet Union due to low oil prices, by 1990 plus or minus one or two years - not a popular notion at the time, but key people did pay heed. Two years before the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs started to move their wealth off-shore in 1988-89. Similar systems dynamics modeling shows similar collapse signals and that Putinism in Russian and President Yanukovych’s regime in Ukraine will suffer a similar fate as did the former Soviet Union

Here's my preliminary list of early warning signals that point to the decay and collapse of both Russia and Ukraine. (N.B. I'm not anti-Russian or anti-Ukrainian, I actually feel quite sorry for most Russian and Ukrainian people, who have to struggle under the current oppressive regimes. I sinc...

Reply to Russell Smith-thanks for taking time to comment..see my reply below--Walter
If you only read the headlines of most newspapers, the perception you would get is that Russia is a rising regional power with ambitions of becoming a global super power again.
A public 2009 Canadian military foresight report summarizes the following: “Since 1999, Russia has been experiencing an economic revival largely based on its oil and natural gas exports. Unlike the USSR, modern Russia is not challenging the world order, only the current power distribution.” It concludes: Wanting to be a player on the world stage again, Russia will pursue continued relations with Europe, NATO, and the United States in order to prevent marginalization and help recreate Russia as at least a regional power. For the foreseeable future, Russia will not aggressively challenge the United States or its allies.”
In fact, this vision of Russia may be overly optimistic. The reverse may now be true.
In reality, both Russia and Gazprom, the state-owned gas company, are both quietly going broke, which the mainstream media and experts ignore. But wait a minute, you ask? Isn’t Russia selling oil and gas like there is no tomorrow? Yes, but that is Russia’s strength for the time being and its Achilles Heel in the medium and long run.
Russian Energy Minister Sergiy Shmatko admitted last November that the Russian oil sector had reached the point where it needs immediate reforms and a reduction in the tax burden, in order to prevent a rapid decline of oil production, starting in 2011-2012. This sector, meanwhile, generates over 40% of Russia’s export revenues, so that reducing the tax burden on the oil sector when Russia is already carrying a budget deficiency in the area of 10% is a very challenging task indeed. Coupled with tumbling oil production, we may see another collapse of both oil and gas prices in the near future. Europe is not as dependent on Russian gas as it once was. It now has other options, such as liquefied natural gas from Qatar and shale gas from Poland and Ukraine within the next five years.
Gazprom also carries a very heavy debt load, and can sustain stability only if its revenues increase, which looks unlikely. Russia had already depleted most of its sovereign wealth fund reserves, and is running budget deficiency 9-12% per year. Under these conditions it will have no resources for bailing out Gazprom. The recovery of the gas market in Europe will not be sufficiently fast, and will not produce sufficient demand to offset emerging competition from Central Asia, Azerbaijan, Qatar, and possibly Poland and Ukraine in European markets.
Remember too that oil price manipulation (keeping oil prices artificially low for a decade) was a geopolitical weapon that was successfully used by the USA (Zbigniew Brzezinski and the Reagan Administration) in an attempt to bankrupt the former Soviet Union. It worked.
Back in the 1970s and 80s, cybernetic experts in Kyiv and Moscow using system dynamics modeling, predicted the collapse of the Soviet Union due to low oil prices, by 1990 plus or minus one or two years - not a popular notion at the time, but key people did pay heed. Two years before the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs started to move their wealth off-shore in 1988-89.
Similar systems dynamics modeling shows similar collapse signals and that Putinism in Russian and President Yanukovych’s regime in Ukraine will suffer a similar fate as did the former Soviet Union.
These geopolitical and economic developments may lead to the economic collapse of Gazprom in the short term and the Russian Federation during the second half of the current decade. Russia already defaulted on sovereign debt in the 1980s and won’t hesitate again to leave foreign bond holders with worthless paper. Such a collapse, even if it won’t impact on the territorial integrity of the Russian Federation, will essentially weaken Russia. It could lead to the rapid escalation of ethnic tensions in the Northern Caucasus, massive infiltration of Chinese migrants into Siberia, and growing separatist movements that will fill the power vacuum. Its ability to play the role of the superpower may be diminished at the regional level and over a larger geographical area, which includes Moldova, Ukraine, Russia, Kirgizstan, Tajikistan, Armenia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan, which may become unstable. The cause of such instabilities are still existent “frozen” conflicts in Transdnisteria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Karabakh, and border disputes in Central Asia. So far, all these conflicts remain “frozen” because of Russia’s heavy military grip. As this weakens, the probability of cross boarder and internal conflicts grows.
A new energy wild card has come into the mix. A new US biotechnology company Joule Unlimited has received a patent on a genetically modified E coli bacteria that can use only carbon dioxide (CO2) and sunlight to generate refined hydrocarbons including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel at a cost of $30 per barrel. So who do you think Europe will be buying oil products from in the future? High priced Russia ?
So if the worst case scenario takes hold in Russia, similar to conditions before the collapse of the Soviet Union, why would Ukraine want to strengthen its economic and political ties with Russia, a losing horse?
See more here at http://bit.ly/fDyi3m

Here's my preliminary list of early warning signals that point to the decay and collapse of both Russia and Ukraine. (N.B. I'm not anti-Russian or anti-Ukrainian, I actually feel quite sorry for most Russian and Ukrainian people, who have to struggle under the current oppressive regimes. I sinc...

Mit106
I'm posting your comment because any opposing views would likley be censored or banned in your country. I actually hope you are right, because I feel sorry for the hard working Ukrainian and Russian people, but not for the current regime in power. But your own experts are predicting collapse. Go complain to them, not to me...wd

Here's my preliminary list of early warning signals that point to the decay and collapse of both Russia and Ukraine. (N.B. I'm not anti-Russian or anti-Ukrainian, I actually feel quite sorry for most Russian and Ukrainian people, who have to struggle under the current oppressive regimes. I sinc...

Jeff in Oregon offers a few salient comments on a related energy list that I belong to--Walter Derzko
=========================
It has always been possible to split water molecules to H2 and O2 with electrolysis. The problem with the standard conversion is that it requires much more input energy than it produces in output energy. There is a big loss step again when you convert the H2 back to electricity again, even with a fuel cell.
The break-through here will be in the efficiency of the energy transaction, not in providing a brand new trick. At best this new technology is an improvement. If its good enough it might further motivate the effort to use hydrogen as an energy storage medium. There is also no reason to limit the energy input to solar panels. Windmills generate intermittent electricity. One can imagine associated hydrogen storage and large scale fuel cells integrated with a wind farm to even out the electricity placed on the grid.
Hydrogen still has a lot of issues that need to be worked out. Portable storage that is large enough and safe for personal transportation is still not good. Stationary storage has more choices.
Hydrogen fuel cells are not as well developed as you might think. The ones that convert efficiency don't have a long service life. The one's with a long service life are not efficient. [Watch for new metal hydride nanotechnology to store H2--Walter Derzko]
The third world example is a good one. If the new process is feasible in small scale, and therefore affordable, and is low cost and is efficient as a total system, then just to have a renewable process to generate H2 to burn for heating and cooking will go a long ways.
My first impression though is that it takes a lot of high-tech to put together a system like this. Its not likely to be in the hands of the 3rd world poor any time soon.
I don't see this development opening the door to a brand new energy source, rather it might provide a way to better utilize what we know how to produce already.
A breakthrough would be if I could drop a vial of enzymes [it's in the works--track synthetic biology R&D and nanocrystals that split water at http://bit.ly/9YGSyX --Walter Derzko]into a vat of water in a clear container, expose it to sunlight, and out of that evolve usable H2 in quantity -- that would be a new energy source. If it has to go through a solar PV panel to generate electricity first, then its just a way to store PV power.
This new electrolysis process is worth watching and might become a positive improvement in how we manage intermittent energy sources, we'll see.
Jeff
Oregon

An MIT chemist Dan Nocera, (who we have profiled here on the Smart Economy blog in the past) has developed a cobalt-phosphate catalyst that converts water and carbon dioxide into hydrogen and oxygen. The process is similar to organic photosynthesis, except that in nature, plants create energy...