Provides easy access to and detailed discussion of the practice of the UN Committee Against Torture

Highly topical in view of allegations of torture in Guantanamo and Iraq and of attempts to extradite persons considered to be 'threats to national security' to States where they may be at risk of torture

Illustrates a model of universal jurisdiction for grave breaches of human rights

The United Nations Convention against Torture

A Commentary

Manfred Nowak and Elizabeth McArthur

Description

The prohibition of torture- the right to physical and mental integrity- is guaranteed in the strongest terms under international law. It is protected as an absolute right, non-derogable even in times of war or public emergency.

The problem of torture resurfaced in the second half of the 20th Century, and more recently in the contexts of the war in Iraq, the situation of detainees in Guantanamo Bay, and of attempts to extradite persons considered to be 'threats to national security' to States where they may be at risk of torture.

The main instrument to combat torture within the framework of the United Nations is the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT). It is one of the few human rights treaties which makes explicit use of criminal law in order to prevent and eradicate violations- the main obligation of States parties to the CAT is to ensure that all acts of torture are offences under domestic criminal law and that punishments are appropriate to the grave nature of such crimes. The CAT even goes beyond the traditional principles of territorial and personal jurisdiction and for the first time applies the principle of universal jurisdiction under a human rights treaty.

This volume explores the problematic definition of torture in the Convention, the substantive obligations of Sates parties, the principle of 'non-refoulement', provisions for international monitoring, and the concept of preventative visits to all places of detention as contained in the Optional Protocol to the CAT. It also covers issues including the distinction between torture and cruel inhuman or degrading treatment and the principle of non-admissibility of evidence extracted under torture. Full article by article commentary on the Convention also provides historical context and thorough analysis of case-law and practice from international and regional courts and monitoring bodies. Relevant case-law from domestic courts (such as that of the House of Lords in the Pinochet case) and the practices of domestic prison inspection panels are also discussed.

The United Nations Convention against Torture

A Commentary

Manfred Nowak and Elizabeth McArthur

Author Information

Professor Manfred Nowak is Director of Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights, University of Vienna; UN Special Rapporteur on Torture and a former Judge of the Human Rights Chamber for Bosnoia and Herzegovnia. Elizabeth McArthur is at the Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights, University of Vienna.

The United Nations Convention against Torture

A Commentary

Manfred Nowak and Elizabeth McArthur

Reviews and Awards

"A work like this was long overdue...Both volumes consist of careful, up-to-date and comprehensive, article-by-article, consideration of the relevant normative texts and ensuing practice, and thus recommend themselves as indispensable for both academic international lawyers and for practitioners, whether at public service or in private practice." --Global Law Books

"Libraries or private collections which specialize in the assessment of issues relating to torture could not possibly boast of completeness without this well-written and superbly documented contribution to the literature on torture." --American Society of International Law