IRS bound to honor designation of voluntary payment by one taxpayer of another’s liability

In a reviewed opinion, the Tax Court held that the IRS must follow a
corporation’s designation of voluntary payments toward the income tax
liabilities of its owners/employees. However, because the payments did
not represent taxes withheld at the source, the IRS was allowed to
levy on the assets of the owners/employees to collect applicable
interest and penalties. Likewise, the corporation remained liable for
interest and penalties attributable to its failure to remit taxes on a
timely basis.

Sec. 3402 requires employers to withhold taxes from wages paid
to employees. Sec. 31(a) provides employees with a credit
against their income tax for amounts withheld at the source. Under Regs.
Sec. 1.31-1(a), this credit is applied to the calendar year of
the withholding without regard to whether or when the employer remits
the tax. Tax of an employee is deemed to have been withheld at the
source only if the employer (1) contemporaneously withholds tax in the
correct amount or (2) corrects a withholding error by making a timely
and proper adjustment.

Rev.
Proc. 2002-26 allows a taxpayer to designate how voluntary
partial payments are applied against liabilities of tax, penalties,
and interest. If a taxpayer does not make a designation, the IRS
generally applies payments to tax, penalties, and interest, in that
order. Likewise, the IRS generally honors designations of voluntary
payments between different types of taxes, such as corporate income or
employment tax obligations. When a tax is divisible, such as
employment taxes that relate to specific employees and calendar
quarters, case law has held that a taxpayer may designate and pay a
divisible portion of the total tax obligation. Sec. 6331(i)(1)
prohibits a levy against a taxpayer with respect to an unpaid
divisible tax during pending legal proceedings.

James and Sharon Dixon served as officers and employees of Tryco, a
temporary staffing business they founded in 1990. At first, Tryco was
a great success, and the Dixons paid themselves generously. In late
1992, however, Tryco stopped filing and remitting employment taxes,
and the Dixons stopped filing individual income tax returns. In 1997,
the Dixons were criminally prosecuted for failure to file individual
income tax returns for 1992 through 1995, and as part of a settlement
that resulted in a reduced sentence, they agreed to make restitution
to the IRS for its tax loss in the amount of $61,021. In 1999, the
Dixons contributed this amount to Tryco, and Tryco then submitted it
to the IRS, accompanied by a cover letter indicating that the payment
represented Tryco’s withholding taxes to be applied to the withheld
income taxes of the Dixons.

In 2000, when accountants prepared the individual income tax returns
for the Dixons’ missing years, they determined that the couple owed
$30,202 more in taxes than Tryco had previously submitted to the IRS.
As before, the Dixons contributed this amount to Tryco, and the
corporation in turn submitted it to the IRS with a cover letter
indicating that the payment represented the Dixons’ withheld income
taxes. On the advice of legal counsel, the Dixons chose not to pay
their individual income tax liabilities directly, believing that the
indirect payments through Tryco would reduce both the portion of the
company’s withholding tax liability attributable to themselves and
their own income tax liabilities. They also hoped to avoid interest
and penalties on the payments by availing themselves of Sec. 31’s
crediting scheme, which treats withholding at the source as paid in
the year of the withholding irrespective of the employer’s date of
remittance.

The IRS initially credited Tryco’s payments to the Dixons’ 1992−95
income tax liabilities, which discharged their tax obligations but not
the applicable interest and penalties. Later, the IRS reversed itself
and applied the payments to Tryco’s general unpaid employment tax
liabilities, which then exceeded $23 million. The IRS then issued a
notice to the Dixons of intent to levy on their assets in satisfaction
of their now unpaid 1992−95 income tax liabilities. The Dixons
petitioned the Tax Court for review.

The Dixons contended first that they were entitled to a withholding
credit under Sec. 31 for the amounts submitted by Tryco on their
behalf in 1999 and 2000. Second, they asserted that the IRS was
obligated to honor Tryco’s designation of the payments as withheld
income taxes and to credit the amounts toward the Dixons’ 1992−95
income tax liabilities.

The IRS argued that its policy of honoring designations of voluntary
payments is confined to particular tax periods or types of tax. It
contended that the policy does not extend to designations of
delinquent employment tax by one party toward the income tax liability
of another.

Both the majority and dissenting opinions of the court concluded that
the funds submitted by Tryco to the IRS in 1999 and 2000 were not
withheld at the source and, accordingly, that the Dixons were not
entitled to a Sec. 31 credit against their individual income tax
liabilities. Regarding the Dixons’ second argument, the majority
determined that the IRS was obligated to follow its published
administrative position regarding designations of voluntary payments.
The IRS was therefore directed to properly credit the $91,223 payments
to the Dixons’ account, fully discharging their 1992−95 income tax
obligations. The IRS was allowed, however, to levy on the Dixons’
assets to collect applicable interest and penalties. Tryco likewise
remained liable for interest and penalties.

TAX NEWS

President Barack Obama signed legislation that retroactively extended more than 50 expired tax provisions for 2014, allowing taxpayers to take advantage of a host of tax incentives during this filing season.

A weekly snapshot of global accounting with news from the Journal of Accountancy and other leading accounting publications. It includes summaries of what matters to you, written by expert editors to save you time and keep you informed and prepared.