Court rejects Nautilus plea to reinstate Icon prelim injunction

In the ongoing patent and trademark infringement case between The Nautilus Group and Icon Health & Fitness, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., has rejected Nautilus' argument to lift the stay that Icon won on a preliminary injunction in early August. This means Icon may continue marketing its Crossbow product during legal proceedings.

In the ongoing patent and trademark infringement case between The Nautilus Group and Icon Health & Fitness, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., has rejected Nautilus' argument to lift the stay that Icon won on a preliminary injunction in early August. Filed Aug. 11, Nautilus' motion requested that the stay be released and the preliminary injunction be reinstated, which would have kept Icon from marketing, selling or advertising its Crossbow by Weider product until a verdict is reached in a December trial.

"Obviously we knew it could go one way or the other, and it kind of went one of the ways we didn't want it to go," Kevin Lamar, president of The Nautilus Group, told SNEWS after the federal court's ruling late Sept. 3 that stated the company's arguments against the stay were "moot." "But we're just going to do business as usual and compete with them.

"We're not done in a long shot with the litigation with Icon, and we're going to continue down that path as aggressively as we can. And we still believe we will prevail in the end," Lamar added.

Fast and furious legal maneuvering has characterized this case from the start. The Nautilus Group filed a suit against Icon in December 2002 in which Nautilus charged Icon with trademark infringement and literal patent infringement on its Bowflex machine by Icon's Crossbow by Weider, which was introduced in October 2002. In May 2003, Nautilus was denied a preliminary injunction for literal patent infringement, and Icon won partial summary judgment on several claims of literal patent infringement, therefore avoiding trial on those.

ADVERTISEMENT

Thanks for watching!

ADVERTISEMENT

Thanks for watching!

But in July, the U.S. District Court in Seattle granted Nautilus a request for a preliminary injunction on the trademark infringement claims, noting that, "There is no dispute that the parties effectively market the same productâ€”a resilient rod home exercise machine." However, all that changed virtually overnight, when the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. stayed the preliminary injunction on Aug. 1, thereby allowing Icon to continue selling the Crossbow during the legal proceedings.

The trademark infringement case is scheduled to being Dec. 1 in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington, in Seattle, Wash. The Bowflex patent expires in April 2004, but Nautilus has promised to defend it until that date since if Nautilus wins damages would date back to when the Crossbow came on the market.

SNEWS View: Based on the maneuverings to date, SNEWS bets this case indeed will make for a very interesting trial. But, as in many of these infringement cases, the attorneys will in the long run come out the winners since neither Nautilus nor Icon are the types of companies that would even consider settling.

Already having knocked down wins in the last few court rounds, Icon Fitness took the TKO in the legal battle brought by Nautilus charging patent infringement on the Bowflex by Icon's Crossbow when the district court dismissed the case last week. "It's done, for all intents and ...read more

Alleging that Icon has allowed retailers to continue to sell its product called Crossbow in violation of a June 2004 preliminary court injunction against it, Nautilus has asked the court to hold Icon in contempt of court. In response, Icon filed a proposed court order on Dec. 28 ...read more

Not willing to give up on the nearly 3-year-old patent infringement case, Nautilus has appealed the lower court victory given to Icon in late May to the federal appellate court. After the win was handed to Icon in May when the court dismissed the case (click here to see the ...read more

Icon Health & Fitness has won a stay from a federal appellate court on a preliminary injunction Nautilus had only finalized two days earlier that would have kept Icon from marketing, selling or advertising its Crossbow at least until a December trial. With legal maneuvers flying ...read more

Taking nearly a year for a decision, the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Court has ruled in favor of The Nautilus Group on a July 2003 appeal and granted the company a preliminary injunction in its case against Icon that charges trademark infringement of ...read more

Losing the first round court battle in its lawsuit charging Icon with infringement of its Bowflex patents, The Nautilus Group will appeal a court ruling that denied a preliminary injunction it sought against Icon Health & Fitness. The injunction would have halted Icon's Weider ...read more

After racking up a majority of the legal wins in the past, Nautilus came up short this week whenÂ a U.S. court dismissed all remaining claims inÂ its pending patent infringement case against Icon less a month before charges were to go to trial, effectively ending the case. The ...read more

In one fell swoop, the nearly five-year legal wrangling in two courts in two states between Nautilus Inc. and Icon Health & Fitness were ended when Nautilus announced an out-of-court settlement of all outstanding intellectual property litigation. Details of the settlement were ...read more

As the two behemoth fitness companies Nautilus and Icon spend millions of dollars a year on several patent and trademark infringement legal battles, Nautilus seems to have gained an upper hand in one suit it brought against Icon in December 2002, even though Nautilus lost its bid ...read more