Compelling stories told by parents and grandparents in Topeka on Monday need to be heard outside the hearing room of the Joint Committee on Children’s Issues. Kansas has some serious problems with the placement and removal of children from homes, and the legislature needs to fix the problems.

Listen to the audio clips of these parents and grandparents below. Read through the selected quotations if listening takes too much time for you. In some of the cases, the prepared statements are also included below, if you want even more details.

“This is by far … the most sensitive and emotional area in which we deal.”

Jordan’s comments here are limited to what he said about the removal of children from the home (his full comments were about an hour long):

Kiegerl gave this introduction for the remaining speakers:

“The Committee has been contacted by about 60 individuals, parents, grandparents, foster care givers, and guardians ad litem, who experienced substantial problems in how children were removed, placed, and handled. Some of these people will testify today, and some of their assertions will be troublesome and critical. They will be highly critical of the delivery system as it is currently in place. Indeed, some of these stories are hard to believe.” …

“The stories we are going to hear today that are troubling — there’s always two sides to each story.”

Chair Kiegerl asked SRS Secretary Jordan to look one more time at these cases and respond to the committee so both sides of the story may be known.

Chair Kiegerl asked those testifying to stay with factual information and avoid opinions not supported by facts:

“Explain your experience. Tell us what happened. And what response you got to your inquiries. Or, whether you did get a response. Do not mention case workers’ names, do not mention supervisors’ names, do not mention SRS employee names, … do not mention the contractors’ name. … This is a fact finding mission, where we need to find out what has gone wrong in these particular cases and to prevent that type of situation to recur for the children’s sake. for the sake of the Agency, for the sake of society as a whole.”

The entries below are listed in chronological order from the presentations on Monday

Valorie Rosproy

Valorie Rosproy: "because I reported the abuse I got my children taken from me and they were sent back to their abuser"

“I went to file for a divorce to get out of a domestic violence situation … to get me and my kids out of a domestic violence situation … “

“… because I reported the abuse — I didn’t report it my son did — I got my children taken from me and they were sent back to their abuser … Now they’re in SRS custody …”

Chair Kiegerl: “What went wrong?”

Rosproy: “I think it began with the case manager having too much authority in this case. She was able to write court orders … There was never a 72-hour hearing. “

Kiegerl: “… If I understand you correctly, the breakdown occurred mainly in the judicial administration…?”

Licensed Master Social Worker, Debbie Wilson, testifed in support of Valorie Rosproy

Debbie Wilson: “… It’s almost as if they want to brush everything under the rug …”

“… All I know is what didn’t happen…”

Sen. Oletha Faust-Goudeau (D-Wichita): “It says that Valorie could not report abuse or neglect of the boys to the school. What was the reason … ?

Wilson: “I think at that point they felt she was leading the boys, but I don’t know how the case manger came to that conclusion. It wasn’t just Valorie making those reports. It was an independent therapist …” … “You’re talking about two little boys who have told and told and told … and no one has done anything about it.”

Kiegerl: “… The system has broken down and really hurt these little boys. It’s something we just need to make sure never happens again.”

“During the trial I had testimony from different people — the foster care parents … — their testimony was overlooked.”

“… bad experiences with DCCA …”

“They said the reason for termination was … me not following the reintegration plan. That was not true.”

“… the ball got dropped on me from the Agency that was contracted through the courts … They didn’t do the job that they were supposed to do, which resulted in my girls being removed from home”

Senator Oletha Faust-Goudeau: “Her parents are in the audience … They have been denied custody of their grandchildren, too, and told there were too old; they were too sick.”

State Rep Bill Otto (R-LeRoy): “Your rights are severed?”

Arnold: “My rights have been terminated … I have no rights to my children. I have not seen them since March. I filed an appeal that didn’t go anywhere. I’m here today because I want my children back.” …

Otto: “Where was your lawyer?” …

Arnold: “I had court-appointed attorneys … I feel I could have done a better job representing myself” ..

Otto: “This should not happen to anybody … I’m so sorry.” …

Chair Kiegerl: “Your problem mainly is with the courts, although, I’m sure, the agency’s testimony was instrumental in the decision. … My heart goes out to you …I wish there were a magic wand that … we could use to solve your problem.”

State Rep Bill Otto: “No crime? You haven’t been guilty of anything? This is a court order that says you can’t go to any school functions?”

“I was under court order till 2004 to not even call the police after I was being beaten because … I was not ‘co-parenting’”

Dombrowski: “These friends of the court make recommendations to the judge. The parents … don’t have a right to see these documents. They do this behind closed doors.”

Otto: (To Secretary Jordan): “You have no rights as a parent …?”

Secretary Don Jordan: “This would be something extreme … I’m not familiar with the situation.”

Otto: “Can a judge do that? … Is that legal… ?”

Jordan: “Under the right circumstances … I hesitate to speculate.”

Sen. Roger Reitz: “This is something that only … the judicial system can really answer … It would be helpful … to have someone … representing the judicial system … to give us some ideas how this could happen.”

Dombrowski: “When you are a victim of domestic violence, and suddenly there’s a child involved, the typical …. power of control is that ‘I’ll take your children from you’. They will and they can the way the laws are setup.” …

“I was told that I’m not to talk to my daughter about the violence. That’s why I don’t see her. That’s why I see her supervised. He was criminally convicted. “

“When women try to get away from people who hurt them … I heard somebody say it’s really hard to believe you won’t call the police … I tell people not to contact the police, because as soon as you walk into court with a DV (domestic violence) and children, you’re already cutting your throat. You will lose your children. That’s the way it is right now.”

“… on the 16th of this month I’ll probably go to jail for breaking the gag order and talking about [being the victim of] violence as it relates to my case.”

Reitz: “… someone ought to be able to deal with this in a way that would address her problem. It doesn’t seem like we’ve done the right thing with regards to this little niche of the law.”

Dombrowski: “The criminal convictions are completely tossed aside and they don’t have any bearing on the family court … The eight criminal convictions that my ex had before getting custody of my daughter were completely dropped [in family court]“

Chair Kiegerl: “I cannot believe that abuse is totally ignored. I cannot believe you can prohibit a person from speaking about their own case.”

“The one thing [where] … I disagree with you is abuse should always be reported.”

State Rep Peggy Mast (R-Emporia): “Domestic violence is a control issue. Sexual abuse is a control issue. Is there any correlation between domestic violence and sexual abuse? Why is that not something that is considered when we take someone to [family] court that has a history of domestic violence?”

Dombrowski: “Yes. That is something I’ve asked myself for 16 years. … It comes back to the family court that has a veil of immunity. … They don’t fully understand the impact of the violence. What battered women have … if they report the abuse, then they’re failing to protect their child … if they don’t report the abuse, they’re still failing to protect their child. So, both ways, they’re going to lose their children …”

For anybody who abuses their wife … [from] a 1996 presidential task force … there is a 70% increase that those children will be abused and/or sexually abused after there’s been battery with the mother.

Sen. Oletha Faust-Goudea: “In 2004 …. I talked with the homicide department in Sedgwick County…. During that time there had been 21 homicides in Sedgwick County and 18 were due to domestic violence …”

“A lot of women do make those phone calls and unfortunately, sometimes it ends in their death.” …

“I want to apologize to you for being treated like a pedophile … not being able to go to a music concert.”

“I commend you for what you’re doing.”

Dombrowski: “I have not talked to my daughter in 10 years [except] for the confines of supervised visits. I’m not allowed to talk to her about anything. All she knows is what her dad has told her.”

“There is significant evidence that my daughter has been abused. This has been downplayed by the courts.”

“Professionals in this case … have used hearsay of one side”

“I feel the main reason my daughter was taken from me was because I reported abuse, my wife reported abuse. My daughter herself reported abuse.”

“My wife and I had to complete psychological evaluations … these evaluations proved my wife and I have no mental illness precluding us from being fit parents.”

“The courts determined that my psychological issues make me an unfit parent and granted guardianship to the maternal grandmother.”

“The grandmother will not allow any type of visitation, not even professionally supervised visitation. ”

“As a father, who previously took care of her from birth, this is pure agony.”

“I will keep fighting for her”

“please pass the protective parent reform bill into law”

Sen Oletha Faust-Goudeau: “There needs to be something presented … to tell him the definite factual reason why he can’t have his wonderful daughter.”

Secretary Don Jordan: “…I believe the petitions that are filed, the orders by the court, are about as specific as you can get…”

Faust-Goudeau: “Excuse me, Secretary. Seriously, I hear that the judge, and the case workers, everyone’s passing the buck.”

Jordan: “The parents should get a very clear reason ….”

Sneary’s wife, Annette: “The only reason the judge determined … because he had a couple of angry incidents. … Everyone has psychological issues. We are not mentally unfit. We are angry. We are emotional. Would you be? …”

Sneary: “No judge in his right mind is going to give custody to a drunken, drug addict. But little did I know what grandma had up her sleeve.”

“We asked them to look at my daughter’s evidence but they never did. They said they didn’t have to.”

“Two court appointed attorneys … said the judge has already made a decision. She has read the reports, which we are not allowed to see. … The GAL (guardian ad litem) had never talked to me or my daughter about her case. He had never investigated on his own.”

“The attorneys told us that she needed to plead ‘no contest’. If she pleaded ‘no contest’ she would get reunification with her children immediately.”

“My daughter plead ‘no contest’, that was three years ago, … and they have severed her rights. She never got her children back.”

“At the first of the case … the CPS worker told me I [the grandmother] would get the three youngest ones — they were involved in the same case.”

“She asked my background. She got all my information. She said we would go to court. The children would be brought to my house. If my house checked out, I would get those children.”

“The little girl … was given to a dad who was on probation for domestic violence. They didn’t even check him out.”

“And even though I was approved for placement for the two boys … they were placed in two separate foster homes. “

“I went back to court and asked for placement of those children …. I got the children out of foster homes … They were in foster care for a week.”

“In two meetings the contractors stated the only reason …. was they would lose their grant. “

“To the case worker outside the court room, I said then I want to adopt my … grandsons.”

“They said you can’t because of your age and disability.”

At a mall “the authorized baby sitter had gone to the bathroom and left the two little boys with the 12 year old sister.” …

“When SRS came out to my house they said ‘no problem’”

“My dad became ill. I had to go to Arizona, so the little boys went to their aunt’s … and stayed for a week.”

“My father passed away. The day I cam back from my dad’s funeral, the contractor called me and said ‘I have bad news. We’re severing your daughter’s rights, and we’re removing the boys from your home’.”

“I said, ‘why?’”

“They said, ‘because of the mall.’”

“I said, ‘I didn’t break that safety plan.’”

“She said, ‘it’s not up for discussion. The decision has been made, we’re removing the boys.’”

Winters says she has 11 instances of mistruths under oath in the hearing.

Chair Kiergerl explains that Winters is one of his constituents, and he has been to her home, and does not understand why the boys were removed, and not returned, even after his investigation. “Even I couldn’t get a straight answer from the contractor, and frankly I’m disgusted with them. …. I have no reason to believe that Ms. Winters is misstating the case.”

Winters (in response to question from State Rep Bill Otto): “You’ve got to understand: With me the contractors make $0 from the federal government. From foster parents they got $2000/month.”

Sen. Julia Lynn: “This has been going on for …. years. I believe that if we didn’t push this issue, and keep pushing it and pushing it, on behalf of all the people who are here, we would still have business as usual. … I’m hoping we can find some things to solve some of these problems.”