The Agency Rides Again: Angleton on Chalabi

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com |
Like everyone else, I've been reading the stories about my friend Ahmad Chalabi of the Iraqi National Congress, and the accusations that he's an Iranian spy. I don't believe it, but before launching a tirade against the misnamed Central Intelligence Agency I thought I'd better check with the greatest unliving expert on intelligence, the late James Jesus Angleton. He was the longtime chief of CIA counterintelligence, and knew everything there was to know about spying, so I dusted off the ouija board and got him on the second try.

JJA: I reckoned you'd decide it was time for another chat.

ML: Right you were. It's about Chalabi. He's a friend of mine, and I would be really upset if he turned out to be an Iranian agent.

JJA: You shouldn't take these things personally. Kim Philby was a friend of mine, after all, and he turned out to be a big-time KGB agent.

ML: Fair enough, we all make mistakes. But the stories in the press don't make sense, and some of the newspapers  like Newsday  have made claims unworthy of a sane person.

JJA: I saw that Newsday story. They said that DIA was convinced that the Iraqi National Congress, from its very inception, was an Iranian master plot to penetrate the American government and organize the overthrow of Saddam Hussein.

ML: Which is one of those stories that only a B-movie Hollywood scriptwriter could put down on paper without praying for forgiveness.

JJA: Not to worry; journalists don't pray. That's why there are so few of them up here. But you're right, the theory is too clever by half. It was probably concocted by somebody who had studied the "Trust," the legendary Soviet operation after the First World War that became famous in the stories about "Reilly, Ace of Spies." Some White Russians had created what appeared to be an anti-Soviet organization that claimed both to have agents at high levels of the Soviet regime, and also to have an underground network within the Soviet Union that was capable of organizing a coup against Lenin. They provided Western intelligence agencies with very good intelligence, and showed their capacities by actually assassinating some fairly high-level Communists. So the Western agencies supported the "Trust," and worked very closely with them.

In reality, the "Trust" was a Soviet operation that actually penetrated Western intelligence services, to the great advantage of the Kremlin. A masterpiece.

ML: So why is it fanciful to accuse the INC of being a Middle Eastern "Trust"?

JJA: Because Chalabi's behavior doesn't fit. He went to Tehran all the time, in part because the State Department and CIA refused to support him, and in part because anyone who wants to operate in that part of the world has to be on decent terms with the mullahs if he wants to survive. They're great killers, you know.

ML: I know, I know. I write about it all the time.

JJA: If anything, the United States pushed him toward the Iranians, and it's laughable that the intelligence community should now blame him for their previous actions.

ML: It's fascinating to watch the anti-Chalabi campaign in Washington. You probably can't keep up with it, but some intel officials in town are saying two things to the journalists: 1) We broke the Iranians' communication codes, so we were reading their mail. Chalabi found out about this, and told the Iranian intelligence chief in Baghdad. 2) The Iranian immediately contacted Tehran to tell them that we had broken the code. Then they said to journalists, "you can't write about this because it would jeopardize our people."

JJA: So they're saying that the Iranians' chief operative in Baghdad told Tehran that their codes had been broken...and his message was sent in the same code?

ML: Seems so.

JJA: Hahahahahahaha. Impossible! If the Iranians knew that we were reading their mail, they would never let us know that they knew. They would continue to use the codes, but instead of sending accurate messages they would use those channels for disinformation against us.

ML: Yes, they're smart enough for that. I've often said that they may be crazy, but they are certainly not stupid.

JJA: Furthermore, using the same logic, if we knew that Chalabi had told the Iranians, we would never go public with the accusations. We would use Chalabi to disinform them. And the information that we had broken the Iranian code doesn't compromise human sources, because most codebreaking is done by supercomputers, and isn't obtained from spies.

ML: So what was this all about?

JJA: Oh, I think it's mostly political, and has little if anything to do with intelligence. The CIA loves to smear people they don't like with claims of super-secret intelligence that rarely exists.

ML: Like those Iraqis who ran from Saddam after the debacle in the mid-Nineties?

JJA: Of course. Remember that we rescued them, and they ended up in Guam?

ML: Uh huh.

JJA: And then the CIA denied entry to three of them, claiming they were spies for Saddam, and they wouldn't let anyone see the intelligence, and they were demanding the three be sent back to Iraq?

ML: And they would have been sent there, to a terrible death, and were only saved because Jim Woolsey volunteered his legal assistance, went to court, demanded to see the intelligence, and found there was nothing there.

JJA: Right. There are many such cases, as you know well.

ML: Sure, they used to say I was an Israeli agent. The head of counterintelligence even claimed I had dual citizenship, and an Israeli passport. All nonsense. He finally shut up when one of his colleagues asked him for the passport number.

JJA: And there was the fairly recent case of a Russian named Luchansky, accused by CIA of being one of the top honchos of the Russian Mafia. He had to go to court in England to get a British judge to demand the "intelligence," and found it was baseless.

ML: And there was another one, in my own experience. Round about 1980, a CIA official whispered to me that they had a tape of a conversation between an NSC staff member and a Polish diplomat, in which the NSC staffer had provided classified information. I never believed it and never wrote it, but it finally made its way into print. After the usual damage to the poor guy's reputation, the "intelligence" was shown to be fanciful.

JJA: As I said, these things are usually political, and the Chalabi case is part of a long campaign by CIA to destroy him. In fact, you can make a fairly convincing case that the "raid" on Chalabi's house was probably an effort to get him killed.

ML: Killed? They were going to shoot him?

JJA: Not "they," even though it does seem there were CIA people on the scene. No, they're smarter than that. They sent Iraqi police to do the dirty work. The police were armed. It was reasonable to assume that at least one of Chalabi's bodyguards would shoot at the intruders, and then a gunfire would ensue, in which...well, people do get hurt at such times, don't they?

ML: Well, it might be even cleverer. The police took all weapons from the compound, and then the raid was announced. Maybe Chalabi's enemies, knowing he was disarmed, would take advantage and go after him.

JJA: Could be. Whatever the truth, the whole sequence of events placed Chalabi in mortal danger, even though it seems to have strengthened him enormously in the eyes of the Iraqi people.

ML: But how is a journalist, or a citizen, to tell what's going on?

JJA: By reasoning paradoxically. Almost all the time, if the intelligence community has real evidence, you'll never hear about it. They will keep it to themselves and use it in their work. If they leak something about someone, it will usually be false.

At which point the ouija board shorted out.

Like this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

05/24/04: Lying into the mirror: Misunderstaning the war on terror05/18/04: Kristof’s Iran04/19/04: The Iranian Hand: Regime change in Tehran is necessary for peace in Iraq04/15/04: Dealing with the Libyans: Is Khaddafi about to cash out?04/08/04: From Tyranny to Freedom: Democracy in Iraq has precedent03/18/04: Drifting, Dangerously: We must support freedom 03/02/04: Once Upon a Spymaster, Part II: Returning to a conversation02/24/04: The Great Iranian Election Fiasco: What actually happened; what we must do02/20/04: Stalinist Mullahs: The Iranian regime is in open battle with its own people 02/11/04: The Jihadis' Primal Scream: Zarkawi's "Yaarrrhhh!"02/04/04: Inelegant Lies: Making sense out of mullahs02/03/04: Potemkin WMDs? Really?01/27/04: The Jihad on Iraq: Bad analysis and bad policy01/20/04: Our Moment of Vainglory: A p.c. mess01/06/04: Aftershocks: The West must read the meter in Bam and Tehran12/02/03: Managing Iraq: We can't continue this way 11/26/03: Back to the Angleton Files11/25/03: The Turks, Italians & us  never again11/06/03: Regional Struggle: Fighting narrow vision in Iraq11/04/03: Unpunished Failure: What are we waiting for?10/21/03: Curses: Diamonds and Naples10/15/03: Into the Quagmire: Important days ahead for Iran09/18/03: The Ayatollahs’ bomb: An invulnerability strategy09/12/03: You can't make peace until the war is won09/11/03: Ron Paul, dishonorable congressman09/03/03: The Latest Horrors: Still organized08/29/03: The Peace Trap: Back to the war, please08/27/03: Angrier and Angrier: Self-deception, big-time08/25/03: Iraq's terrorists have friends in high places07/10/03: The Future of Iran: Armitage might want to rethink that "democracy" line07/02/03: Looking Toward July 9: Independence Day in Iran?06/24/03: Iran: Back the freedom fighters06/17/03: The Iranian Revolution, 2003: Regime change in the air06/05/03: Academic Standards: A Middle East scholar has his way with the truth.05/28/03: The Moment of Truth? U.S. policy could determine Iran's destiny05/15/03: Iran's Path: Stopping the mullahs in their tracks05/13/03: The Nuclear Axis of Evil: The people solution05/08/03: Inside the Dark: Applebaum's Gulag05/06/03: Tough Guy: Powell's curious priority list05/01/03: Desert Shame Redux: Want a free Iran and a free Syria? We have to fight for it04/25/03: Timing Is Everything: We have a narrow window in Iraq to win Shiite support04/15/03: Political war can remove terror masters in Syria and Iran04/07/03: The Others: We have miles to go in eliminating the Axis04/02/03: French Lies: Take the foreign minister at his word03/31/03: Why muzzle Saddam's foes? 03/28/03: The post-war terror threat 03/26/03: All Fronts: Military war, political war, psychological war03/24/03: More Bad News for Daschle: Taking out terror of all nationalities03/21/03: The Killer Pneu: Virus terror from China03/13/03: Iran: Nuclear suicide bombers? 03/11/03: A Theory: What if there's method to the Franco-German madness?03/05/03: The Iranian-Election Revolt: The people speak. The West won't listen02/19/03: The willful blindness of those who will not see02/12/03: The Europeans Know More Than They Now Pretend? They choose to dawdle and obstruct02/03/03: Monumental failure: Nelson Mandela had promise01/30/03: Elevation: The president knows what it's all about01/29/03: No Leader: France's Chirac is all about personal interest01/28/03: The Axis of Evil Redux: Same place, a year later01/27/03: The Return of the Ayatollah: Washington could afford a little more attention on Iran01/13/03: How we could lose01/09/03: Fish are Better than Women: Gauging U.S. priorities01/07/03: The Shape of Things to Come: The terror masters are now waiting for us12/20/02: A Prophecy for the New Year --- Faster, please!12/16/02: Scud Surrender: The "W" factor12/13/02: The Heart of Darkness: The mullahs make terror possible12/12/02: The Real War12/09/02: Tom Friedman's Reformation: His Iran11/26/02: How Tyrannies Fall: Opportunity time in Iran11/22/02: The Blind Leading the Blind: The New York Times and the Iranian crisis11/13/02: The Temperature Rises: We should liberate Iran first --- now 11/05/02: End of the Road: Iran's Mohammed Khatami, on his way out10/29/02: The Angleton Dialogues, Contnued: What George Tenet doesn’t know10/24/02: The Iranian Comedy Hour: In the U.S., the silence continues10/16/02: Sniper, Saboteur, or Sleeper? Channeling James Jesus Angleton10/01/02: The real foe09/27/02: The Iranian String Quartet: The mullahs get increasingly nervous09/25/02: The Dubya Doctrine09/23/02: Intelligence? What intelligence?09/12/02: America's revenge: To turn tyrannies into democracies 09/10/02: Iran & Afghanistan & Us: We'll have to deal with the mullahcracy, sooner or later09/04/02: Iran, according to the Times: All the nonsense that's fit to print08/21/02: Life and death of Abu Nidal tells us a great deal about our enemies08/08/02: Can You Keep a Secret?: The media silence on Iran08/06/02: Fantasy Reporting: The latest disinformation from the Washington Post08/02/02: Propping Up the Terror Masters: Europe's Solana on tour07/16/02: Bush vs. the Mullahs: Getting on the side of the Iranian freedom fighters07/12/02: The State Department Goes Mute: It's official: State has no message07/09/02: History being made, but the West appears clueless06/05/02: Is George Tenet endangering peace in Israel?06/03/02: Ridiculous, even for a journalist05/20/02: So how come nobody's been fired yet?05/14/02: Open doors for thugs04/20/02: Iran on the Brink … and the U.S. does nothing 04/16/02: Its the war, stupid … someone remind Colin Powell 04/08/02: Gulled: In the Middle East, Arafat doesn't matter04/02/02: Faster, Please: The war falters03/26/02: The Revolution Continues: What's brewing in Iran03/18/02: Iran simmers still: Where's the press?03/05/02: We can't lose any more ground in Iran 02/14/02: The Great Iranian Hoax02/12/02: Unnoticed Bombshell: Key information in a new book01/31/02: The truth behind the Powell play01/29/02: My past with "Johnny Jihad's" lawyer 01/21/02: It's Munich, all over again01/08/02: What's the Holdup?: It's time for the next battles in the war against terrorism 12/11/01: We must be imperious, ruthless, and relentless12/06/01: Remembering my family friend, Walt Disney11/28/01: The Barbara Olson Bomb: Understanding the war11/13/01: How We're Doing: The Angleton Files, IV11/06/01: A great revolutionary war is coming10/25/01: How to talk to a terrorist10/23/01: Creative Reporting: Learning to appreciate press briefings10/19/01: Not the Emmys: A Beltway award presentation10/15/01: Rediscovering American character10/11/01: Somehow, I've missed Arafat's praise of the first stage of our war on terrorism10/04/01: What do we not know?09/28/01: Machiavelli On Our War: Some advice for our leaders09/25/01: No Room for the U.N.: Keeping Annan & co. out of the picture09/21/01: Creative destruction09/14/01: Who Killed Barbara Olson?08/22/01: How Israel will win this war 08/15/01: Bracing for war 08/09/01: More Dithering Democrats08/02/01: Delirious Dems07/31/01: Consulting a legendary counterspy about Chandra and Condit, cont'd07/19/01: Be careful what you wish for 07/17/01: Consulting a legendary counterspy about Chandra and Condit 07/05/01: Let Slobo Go 05/30/01: Anybody out there afraid of the Republicans?05/09/01: The bad guys to the rescue 05/07/01: Bye-bye, Blumenthal 04/20/01: Handling China04/11/01: EXAM TIME!04/05/01: Chinese over-water torture03/27/01: Fighting AIDS in Africa is a losing proposition03/14/01: Big Bird, Oscar, and other threats03/09/01: Time for a good, old-fashioned purge03/06/01: Powell’s great (mis)adventure02/26/01: The Clinton Sopranos02/20/01: Unity Schmoonity: Sharon is defying the will of the people01/30/01: The Rest of the Rich Story01/22/01: Ashcroft the Jew01/11/01: A fitting close to the Clinton years12/26/00: Continuing Clinton's shameful legacy12/21/00: Clinton’s gift for Bush