Rabbi Kamins added that the first couple to be married will be two men.

In the meantime, the synagogue has hosted a ceremony renewing marriage vows between Dr Kerryn Phelps and Jackie Stricker with Rabbi Kamins officiating.

Australia legislated for same sex marriage last month with both women playing role to secure the success of the push for the new law.

On her Facebook page Kerryn Phelps wrote: “On 4 January 1998 Jackie and I married in a religious ceremony in New York.In 2011 we returned to New York for the legal ceremony when marriage equality was introduced, but it was not recognised in Australia until a few weeks ago.

Today we celebrated the 20th anniversary of that first ceremony, this time renewing our vows in the presence of our family and friends in our home country.

It was a joyful celebration of our 20th anniversary, the achievement of marriage equality and a closing of the circle for us.’

It was also a reminder that inclusion and acceptance by your faith community is a potent force for spiritual wellbeing.

J-Wire understand that Sydney’s North Shore Temple Emanuel has no marriage booked and the TBI in Melbourne is yet to respond.

Comments

Will the good rabbi please explain how, in the synagogue which employ him, he can celebrate and sanctify a relationship which leads to a practice described in the bible as an abomination for which the penalty was stoning.

Isn’t it the Jewish way to simply keep quiet and ignore practices that no longer apply in modern times, say like stoning disobedient sons or forcing a woman accused of adultery to drink a concoction of filth from the Temple site?

I have been a member of NSTE for four decades. The Reform Judaism that attracted and inspired me is no longer recognizable; it has transmogrified into a virtue signalling movement searching for politically correct social rights to champion.

Paul, whatever it is you have in mind that is an abomination certainly doesn’t require the blessing of a rabbi or the government to happen, and if as you suspect, it will happen after marriage, chances are it is happening beforehand in glorious abundance.

I hope you are as concerned that heterosexual couples are not abominating in their marriages the same way you fascinate with homosexual men (and women?) abominating, because if not, surely that would indicate a degree of hypocrisy.

Paul, you seem to be at odds with Progressive Judaism on this issue, which is bizarre seeing you attend a Progressive Jewish synagogue. Perhaps it’s time to talk to your rabbi, or change your synagogue.

Lynne, the term “queer” in contemporary use is not generally a pejorative term, and is in fact quite affirming. Please take the time to research how it is used in the vernacular, particularly by queer-identifying peoeple.

As much as I don’t like labels, because they are so constrictive and damaging at times, I don’t mind being called “gay” or “queer”, as long as they are not used as slurs.

Perhaps the most damaging term is “straight”, because it’s use suggests a default sexuality, which is a preposterous concept.

So you think that’s the answer?
When you have the likes of the above pictured couples…..and Michael Kirby’s “Leaders needed to end LGBTIQ violence”, bringing their own condemnation whether a term and acronym. The very thought of the word conjures up a negative connection and wounding at least to children having their parents classified as such.
Society is stooping pretty low in my opinion in accepting it.

Lynne, please look up Queer Theory. It is real, it is here and for the foreseeable future it’s not going away. You seem to be hung up on something that many people readily embrace. Please learn and understand. And for what it’s worth the word Queer does not appear once in the article you reference.

This nothing to do with SSM and the law.
It’s the “Queer” used in the acronym GLBTIQ that’s the issue here and the generalisation that its acceptable.
It isn’t for many or necessary.
Here in Australia it spells out Gay, Lesbian,Bisexual, Transender, Intersex and Queer where as LBGT suffices and no edge given for offense or inviting [privately or publicly] derogatory comments and psychological harm to children.
If you’re not a parent at least, with any insight further discusssion leads nowhere.
At least someone may take comfort in what I’ve said and can do no more than that.

Lynne, while it’s clear beyond doubt that you don’t like me self-identifying as a queer man, it’s not your place to tell other people how they should or shouldn’t self-identify.

The “I” in LGBTIQ is for Intersex. The Q is for Queer. There are people who are not Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual or Transgender. What do you propose people who are gender fluid, gender neutral or non-binary to call themselves? Perhaps F for Freak?

Stop making a martyr of yourself.
You could be Old King Cole for all I care happy to have the general terminology attributed to yourself.
To even mention the word Freakin in this context is disgusting and speaks volumes.

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be consideredEmail addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

In July 2016, Pope Francis makes an emotional visit to Auschwitz, the former Nazi death camp where more than 1.1 million Jews were executed. In the dark shadows of the Holocaust, the Pope prays for the forgiveness of mankind, and immerses himself in the controversial legacy of his predecessor, Pope Pius XII.