This is my first ever post at Stormfront. Since I view our plight in a global context, I think that it's only fitting that I start by expressing my sorrow and anger at the South African genocide against Whites. The genocide that the American media completely ignores. In addition, the social constructs that the Black Communists have put in place, like the "Black Empowerment Program," where hard working Whites must "share" 50% of their business ownership with undeserving Blacks. 50% of their livelihood, creativity, and honest toil in establishing those businesses over generations. They probably reason that it's "50-50," it's only fair. Under Apartheid, the Blacks benefitted greatly compared to what they were, which explains why South Africa had one of the worst illegal immigration problems in the world during Apartheid. Never lose faith, the global race struggle is now only just beginning.

This is my first ever post at Stormfront. Since I view our plight in a global context, I think that it's only fitting that I start by expressing my sorrow and anger at the South African genocide against Whites. The genocide that the American media completely ignores. In addition, the social constructs that the Black Communists have put in place, like the "Black Empowerment Program," where hard working Whites must "share" 50% of their business ownership with undeserving Blacks. 50% of their livelihood, creativity, and honest toil in establishing those businesses over generations. They probably reason that it's "50-50," it's only fair. Under Apartheid, the Blacks benefitted greatly compared to what they were, which explains why South Africa had one of the worst illegal immigration problems in the world during Apartheid. Never lose faith, the global race struggle is now only just beginning.

Comment: Let this be a warning to all foreign investors to stay away from South Africa - because anyone's property - any urban, suburban and agricultural land -- can be seized under this new expropriation law...

June 8 2005 - SA's land minister is all set to approve the country's first forced expropriation order.
The expropriation order for the highly-productive farm of Afrikaner farmer Mr F Visser of Delarey - it is expected to be signed by the minister by the end of the week or early next week -- is rekindling fears that expropriations in which farmers will be 'compensated' with useless government bonds, will become the norm instead of the exception.

The department's financial directorate would this week "finalise the amount of compensation to be paid" to the farmer before the order is signed.However, it's all a totally meaningless spindoctoring exercise: whatever 'compensation' is received by Mr Visser, will be in the form of government bonds... which he won't be able to cash in, if at all, for several years...Essentially, farmer Visser is going to be "paid" for his valuable, productive and much-improved farm with a useless bit of printed paper.And under this new law, the only thing he can still legally argue about is the amount of 'compensation' filled on on those government bonds...
Farmer Visser has become an illegal squatter on his own farm:As a matter of fact right now, farmer Visser can be thrown off his farm as an illegal squatter, together with his family and his workers -- because he is already considered a 'former owner' with no rights on his own property any longer.

And all this can be done legally in South Africa now, under the new "Restitution of Land Rights Act" - which allows the individual minister to expropriate any land anywhere at her own pleasure, and without any court order - and under the stipulations of this law, this includes not only farm land which had been 'stolen from blacks after 1913' -- but also any other privately-held property owned by paler-skinned people in urban and suburban areas of South Africa.

Farmers' unions expressed deep disappointment yesterday at the minister's decision - pointing at that at the time the law was signed, the ANC-regime had assured everyone concerned that this law would only be used in 'extreme circumstances.'

Laurie Bosman, president of the pro-ANC farmers' union AgriSA, was whimpish about the land-theft, merely saying that this expropriation "sends the wrong message to the outside world for investment and property rights in SA."

Chris Jordaan, president of the Transvaal Agricultural Union, said the move signalled the start of state-sanctioned land grabs.

"The only difference between SA and Zimbabwe is that the minister does it here through racist legislation."

Visser in the Delareyville district of North West had initially wanted R6m (a mere $600,000) before lowering his price to R3m. However, a government-appointed valuer then revalued his very productive farm downward to a mere R1,7million, ($170,000) but the farmer said the land was highly fertile, his homestead and outbuildings were much more valuable then that and he refused to budge.Yet all this wrangle is meaningless because they are getting 'paid' in government bonds, in other words the land is simply being stolen from them.
Visser was among five Afrikaner farmers in Gauteng, Limpopo, Mpumalanga and North West province who faced expropriation last year when "price negotiations" deadlocked.

They "agreed to resume talks" after they were forced into it when threatened with expropriation.

LAND Affairs and Agriculture Minister Thoko Didiza is set to approve SA's first expropriation order using a new restitution law, Gauteng and North West land claims chief Blessing Mphela said yesterday.

The expropriation order, which is expected to be signed by the minister by the end of the week or early next week, may spark fears that it could become the norm instead of the exception, as occurred in neighbouring Zimbabwe.

The department's financial directorate would this week finalise the amount of compensation to be paid to the farmer before Didiza signed the order, Mphela said.

An amendment to the Restitution of Land Rights Act passed last year allows the minister to expropriate land under claim without a court order. This is the first time that the amendment has been applied.

"All other avenues should be exhausted before this extreme measure is taken," said Laurie Bosman, president of farmers' union AgriSA. "It sends the wrong message to the outside world for investment and property rights in SA."

Chris Jordaan, president of the Transvaal Agricultural Union, said the move signalled the start of state-sanctioned land grabs. "The only difference between SA and Zimbabwe is that the minister does it here through legislation."

Mphela said he had been forced to recommend expropriation after price negotiations deadlocked for eight months.

"There are still farmers who feel they can resist restitution, but they are not in the majority," he said.

He denied the move would scare off investors. "Expropriation is not the main vehicle for land delivery," he said. "It is only done in extreme cases and having due regard for the rights of the owner."

The farmer, F Visser in the Delareyville district of North West, had initially wanted R6m before lowering his price to R3m. A government-appointed valuer pegged its ceiling value at R1,7m, but the farmer refused to budge.

He was among five farmers in Gauteng, Limpopo, Mpumalanga and North West province who faced expropriation last year when price negotiations deadlocked.

They agreed to resume talks after being served with letters of intent, prompting provincial land claims commissioners to withdraw their recommendation to expropriate.

The restitution law applies only to land from which blacks were forcibly removed through apartheid policies after 1913.