Subscribe to our Blog via email

USPTO budget increases for FY 2016 despite reduced fee estimates

The United States’ federal budget for the 2016 fiscal year was recently unveiled by President Barack Obama. This latest budget increases the amount of money that will be available to the United States Patent and Trademark Office, although the amount specifically appropriated is less in FY 2016 than it was in FY 2015. This has lead some to incorrectly claim that the USPTO will have access to less funding in FY 2016 compared with FY 2015. Admittedly, that would ordinarily seem like a logical conclusion, but when talking about the budget, particularly the USPTO budget, logic and reason can’t always be applied in a linear fashion.

As part of the America Invents Act (AIA), the USPTO was ostensibly given authority to use the fees it collects to fund operations. That right, however, still remained contingent upon Congressional approval through the budgeting process, which largely didn’t change the fact that the USPTO is still beholden to Congressional appropriators. The AIA also created a reserve fund for the USPTO, and that is how the USPTO will have more access to funds in FY 2016 compared with FY 2015 while there appears to be a decrease in funding in the budget. According to the IPO, the FY “2016 budget proposes that the agency will draw from its operating reserves and other income to fund its total estimated obligations of $3.499 billion, including enhanced investment in its IT infrastructure.”

Thus, the total budgetary resources available to the PTO is area of the budget where estimates actually reduce between FY 2015 and FY 2016. The latest budget represents a reduction in FY 2015 total budgetary resource estimates of more than $400 million, from $4.261 billion to $3.819 billion. In FY 2016, the estimated total budgetary resources drop to $3.721 billion, a reduction of less than $100 million from FY 2015 estimates but a drop in reserve fund levels all the same. This creates the need for the agency to dip into operating reserves in order to bridge the nearly $300 million gap between estimated base fee collections and expected programming expenditures for FY 2016.

The 2016 fiscal year budget request by the Department of Commerce indicates that the USPTO has been authorized to spend its estimated base fee collections for 2016 of $3.207 billion. This forecasted amount of fee collection revenue continues a trend of year over year increases in fee collections from the 2015 estimate ($3.142 billion) and the actual 2014 collections ($3.024 billion).

The total budgeted program level for the USPTO during the 2016 fiscal year has also been growing incrementally year over year. The total estimated obligations of the PTO for 2016 are $3.499 billion, over $150 million more than 2015’s estimated obligations ($3.331 billion) and about $500 more than actual 2014 obligations ($2.997 billion). The vast majority of the FY 2016 budget, more than $3 billion, is dedicated for patent activities; only $324 million is set aside for trademark activities. This seems to comport with the long standing notions that patent activities make up approximately 90% of the agency’s activities, while trademarks roughly approximate 10% of the agency’s activities.

The nearly $3.5 billion program funding level for the USPTO will further allow the agency to not only continue the implementation of the America Invents Act, it would also go towards activities designed for following through on the administrative actions for the agency as proposed by the President’s Patent Task Force. According to the 2016 budget, the agency’s major activities will include the reduction of overall pendency and backlog, enhancing patent quality, improving appeal and post-grant processes, ensuring optimal IT service delivery for all users and improving IP protections globally. Efforts to curb abusive patent litigation are also supported by the budget, which repeats the President’s call to Congress to find legislative solutions for greater transparency in the U.S. patent system as well as the prevent of frivolous patent infringement lawsuits.

Even though fee collections have been on the rise, the recently unveiled U.S. budget does indicate lower estimates for fee collections than have been forecasted in previous federal budgets. The base fee collection estimates for 2015 in the latest budget is almost $300 million less than the estimate included in the Department of Commerce’s budget request for fiscal year 2015; the projected fee collection amounts in that year’s budget request was $3.441 billion as opposed to the most recent estimate of $3.142 billion.

There were those who had criticized the seemingly “aggressive” nature of the original 2015 fee collection when last year’s federal budget was released. During the 2013 U.S. government shutdown, about $160 million in fee collections from the USPTO were subject to sequester in large part because the FY 2013 budget included fee collection estimates that far exceeded what the agency actually collected. Even though the American Invents Act contains language that prevents diversion of fees collected by the USPTO to be used for other purposes, those funds were at risk of sequestration because fee collections in FY 2013 did not exceed budgeted appropriations.

Fee collection mechanisms provided to the USPTO by the AIA have been cited by PTO Deputy Director Michelle Lee as a major contributor towards making the agency self-sustainable, a viewpoint she offered during herrecent confirmation hearing before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. Lee’s nomination to become the next Director of the agency remains pending.

The Author

Gene Quinn is a patent attorney and the founder of IPWatchdog.com. He is also a principal lecturer in the PLI Patent Bar Review Course, which helps aspiring patent attorneys and patent agents prepare themselves to pass the patent bar exam. Gene is admitted to practice law in New Hampshire, is a Registered Patent Attorney licensed to practice before the United States Patent Office and is also admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. You can contact Gene via e-mail.

Steve Brachmann is a writer located in Buffalo, New York. He has worked professionally as a freelancer for more than seven years. He has become a regular contributor to IPWatchdog.com, writing about technology, innovation and is the primary author of the Companies We Follow series.

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com. Read more.