The Predictable Call To Accept The Wages Of Slut

Way back, Chateau Heartiste wrote in regards the spreading (heh) sluttification of America:

Single moms like to talk about how they do things on their own, and they “don’t need a man”. But in fact, flex time and related corporate incentives *are* a form of substitute husband and father. That money for flex time has to come from somewhere, usually in higher prices for the company’s products or in lowered salaries for its employees. It is private welfare, but welfare just the same. Now companies can choose to offer this to their heart’s content; after all, no one is forcing me to buy their products or work there and thus subsidize the lifestyles of a bunch of single moms and harried working moms. But my advice to men who want to maximize their earning potential — work for companies that don’t offer generous payoffs in an effort to recruit working moms. It is likely you will command a higher salary with more patriarchal companies. […]

When financially self-sufficient women turn away from beta providers as a source of sexual arousal, they substitute other alpha male qualities in its place. Big government is a beta provider substitute with alpha male qualities.

Fast forward to today: GLPiggy has a post up quoting a young, newly minted feminist who wishes to strip single momhood of its social stigma.

Teen motherhood, single motherhood, unmarried cohabitation—these are not plagues or social ills that pose a threat to the otherwise normal structures of everyday life. They are our new social reality.

What the show doesn’t get to is that this is a good thing.

There is nothing wrong with teenage or single motherhood. The things children need: economic livelihood, emotional support and an education, are not dependent on a nuclear family structure. Poverty is poverty whether it’s endured by two people or four. A couple cannot raise a child better than one can. Once we get rid of the idea that marriage is the privileged form of cohabitation and that women cannot raise children without the help of a man—ideas that the Left has been working to eradicate for decades—there is no reason that a teen should not be financially and emotionally assisted for her choice to have a family. The potential diffusion of the family (as the New York Times recently reported, it doesn’t look like the trends will stop anytime soon) is one of the most exciting things to happen to the American social pattern since sexual liberation. It means the end of what were just decades ago universal truths: every household must be headed by a breadwinning man; only when married will a woman have social value.

I invite readers to draw the relevant connections between these two excerpts.

Meanwhile, I suggest aspiring single moms who wish to truly Go Their Own Way (SGTOW?) practice what they preach and divest themselves of all male support, in whatever form. That means: no redistribution from unrelated men to single moms, no corporate welfare in the form of maternity leave or flex time or special insurance policy discounts, no government handouts predicated on number of children, no shamelessness exacerbating EBT cards, no punitive alimony or child support payouts, no affirmative action for the children of single moms. In short, no sexless drone provider beta male largesse to save single moms from a self-inflicted life of indigent misery.

If this were to happen, and feminists were taken at their word and bequeathed a world in which all male influence was excised from their lives and they were left to fend for themselves and their bastard spawn, empowered and self-actualized, the resulting river of blood and the symphony of children’s cries reverberating through hell’s heart itself would quickly, very quickly I predict, disabuse feminist cunts of the luxury of their man and father hatred. Lie-exalting ruling class sophistry would blow away effortlessly like hay in a hurricane.

But of course feminists don’t really want men removed from their lives; they love having de facto castrated beta males foot their bills, and the bills of their unholy unclaimed consolidated stem cell packages. A massive transfer of wealth from quasi-cuckolded beta males to feckless females is the *whole point*, the UR PURPOSE, of feminism. It is giving women what they want — money and support — to do as they please, without asking of them anything in return (typically, sex and fidelity).

In the distant future, when archaeologists (or aliens who are rummaging through the wreckage of their terraforming experiment) stumble upon a lone monolithic server storing the collected wisdom of this blog, the group of excavators will hook it up, read the ancient scrolls, and stare in quiet at their feet as a depressing realization sweeps over their collective consciousness:

“someone knew. someone saw it coming.”

And from the origin point of the universe, a great guffaw will issue, and galaxies will rattle as the mightiest HAA HAWW ever to grace the cosmic firmament blasts forth from its waiting slumber.

Like this:

Related

376 Responses

For those that don’t get the title someone saw it coming before our host:

On the first Feminian Sandstones we were promised the Fuller Life
(Which started by loving our neighbour and ended by loving his wife)
Till our women had no more children and the men lost reason and faith,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “The Wages of Sin is Death.”

Have you read where Harpending says we are turning into a ‘gardening’ style society? But in African gardening societies the women do the gardening while men fight amongst themselves. You are describing a lose lose near future for beta males because where they do most of the gardening as well…. How long will they accept it for? Two or three generations?

the future is now. no-fault divorce is firmly entrenched and will never be changed. I’m a castrated beta provider involuntarily due to no fault divorce (and because I was stupid and uninformed when I got married)

alpha fucks and beta bucks
dat is how we roll
da butthexting cockass we fucks and sucks
and in our anuthes it doth deosul
alpha fucks and beta bucks
it is da way of da fed
to transfer assetss to dose who butthext
cuckold dose who pay for our bread
beta bucks and alpha fucks
it’s what day teach us we;’re entitled too
da assetts from betas we plucks
after da alphas desol us through our hole for poo
lzozozlzzolzlzlzlz
cuckold da betas cockhold da alphas
datsz what day taught us in mba grad school
as da feiisnsits see no truth nor justice in their laws
and say da great books for menz was all fools.
yes, yes, i did very good on my gmats
dey bernenakifed my soul away, left me with cats

zlzlzzozozozo

today da professor GBFM would like to lecture on INFLATION lzozozz

once upon a times $50,000 would buy yo u a nice house a nice wife two cars and three kids who you could play baseballs with and raise to be nice girls and nice boyz zlzoozoz

today $1,000,000 will buys you an cassocked assockccoked, embittered, doused, deosueld and bernanenkied butthexed dfeminsistasz who will take %70 70% of oyiry assets in divroce court as ada dirvroce industries forces men to pay for past use oif a pussiezzes which is why da enoeteconths hate prostiutuitions as it does not make man pay for past pussy uyse but only present pussy use and da neococonths hatchet comepetitzzinonszz lzozlzlzoz, and dat $1,000,000 will be used to pay your wives dirvocre attorney and fund her future as socking sesisosns dat day got her hooked on in college during da prrima noctae asosckingszz seeisosnsnsns lzozlzozozo and den da $1,000,000 will be whittled down furthers buying presscirtption drugs for your dumbed down drugged up kids who you never get to see because ebernenekifiers seized den as poker chips in da fed’s wealth transfer games zlzozlzl

so now you see da definition of butthex, wealth-rttrannsfeeringz INFLATION lzozozlzlzoz

ust remember dat many are not ready to be unbuttblugged from da matrix lzlzzllzzlzl

so many have been butthexed for so long dat 2 try 2 take da life-sucking cockas outta der anuth will result in dem h8ing h8ing h8ing u and defending da tucker max rheyems with bgoldman sax buttehxtteetrszz zlzozlzzooz

like next tim eu are out with a chick, ask her,

“so how does it feel 2 be da first generation of oemenz buttcocked and deosuled by da federlr reseverssZZ? lzozozozozozz”

lzlzozozozzoz

dis is why it is better to just hooks ups with da owmenz da desouled womenz rather than try to talk or reasons or logic with demzz lzozozlz

yah all da buttcocked womenz were adidiceted to abuseive behavaior so now they all demand buutcocockcingz on demandz or elee dey will take the wife hous ekidz and give them all to eberganaikezz aas fmeinsissms is alll about welath transfer from bgood men good salpha men to de dbeebrnake betas and buttchetsttx zlzzlozzo

hey heartsitsez!! dis morning i went to church and wortee a poem soem poetry dedicated to jeststh and moses and aoslsomon and god! lzozlzzo

Today’s “Church”
is little more
than a front
for the banking cartel’s divorce and child-support industry
today’s church
is like a used car lot
where the pastors and preachers
try to get you to buy
a cum-guzzling, beatup old woman
with dents and dings from lotsa cockas
with the living spawn of the assclomns and douchetards
who pumped her gina hard
as she opended it freeely for tehmz lzlzlz
as th banksters commanderded her to
in sex-ed looozozozlz
lzolzoozozzoz
with suspension damage from having been driven hard
with lotsass cocas suspsusnpnsionz damage
over speedbumps asscockig speedbumps
driven hard hard hradrr lzozlz yah faster harder! he ssveemed! lzozlzlzo

other men drove her for free
as she rode da lostas cockas carousel lzozlz
up and down and up and down and round and round
until her butt and gina were so wore
whe coudln’t trake it no more
and dat is when she climbed on again
like a rooster riding hen lzozozozozoz

and now the preacher tells you
that she is really good as new
so “man up!” the lordeth commandeth! zlzolzoz
and buy the gas-guzzling broke-down money pit!
which other men drove for free
hen it was younger hotter tighter
and fifty pounds lighter!
for free before the rust ate it out
alongside the tongues of many menz
who deluged her in buckets
of foamy slaty cum zlzllzolzo

buy it! da preacher commandeth
from teh pulpit! lzozozol

no pimp would ever charge ye
for past use of a puusy
but dat is what the beranke corporate-church-state
dost to thou via alimonies
and child support
which yuor ex will use
to fund future assocking sessions with other men
da central bankers and your preacher
exalt in humiliation
abortion and assocking aare not enough
but they must make good men
pay for it
and den do dey clap witheir stanaic liteles hands
and counte their fiat dolarz
and say “god is good yah god is good” lzozozlzo

he got her ass, and soon,
so very soon, while the wedding cake is yet moist
as mosist as her pususy was for all da assockers
dat got her beforre you
she will seize your assets and children
and hand them
over to the buttehxting corporate state church cartel
lzoozozozzoz

such is the way
of modern marriage
in da buttehxt matrix

i can show you the door
neo
but you will have to walk through it
without dripping on all da lostass cocatsskskas
in her fitrue wives bbuthozlzozlzozlzozl
zlzozlzlzoz

Your poem really spoke to me GBFM. I like your postings on Darlock. What denomination of church do you go to? I’ve noticed my church venturing into the whole “support the single moms and man up” brainwashing.

DEAR SIR TACOMASTER zlzozlzlzozozo,
In some of the delightful conversations with you in the evenings of 1798-99, and which served as an anodyne to the afflictions of the crisis through which our country was then laboring, the Christian religion was sometimes our topic; and I then promised you that one day or other I would give you my views of it. They are the result of a life of inquiry and reflection, and very different from that anti-Christian system imputed to me by those who know nothing of my opinions. To the corruptions of Christianity I am indeed opposed, but not to the genuine precepts of Jesus himself. I am a Christian, in the only sense in which he wished anyone to be: sincerely attached to his doctrines in preference to all others, ascribing to himself every human excellence, and believing he never claimed any other. At the short interval since these conversations, when I could justifiably abstract my mind from public affairs, the subject has been under my contemplation. But the more I considered it, the more it expanded beyond the measure of either my time or information. In the moment of my late departure from Monticello, I received from Dr. Priestley his little treatise of “Socrates and Jesus Compared.” This being a section of the general view I had taken of the field, it became a subject of reflection while on the road and unoccupied otherwise. The result was, to arrange in my mind a syllabus or outline of such an estimate of the comparative merits of Christianity as I wished to see executed by someone of more leisure and information for the task than myself. This I now send you as the only discharge of my promise I can probably ever execute. And in confiding it to you, I know it will not be exposed to the malignant perversions of those who make every word from me a text for new misrepresentations and calumnies. I am moreover averse to the communication of my religious tenets to the public, because it would countenance the presumption of those who have endeavored to draw them before that tribunal, and to seduce public opinion to erect itself into that inquisition over the rights of conscience which the laws have so justly proscribed. It behooves every man who values liberty of conscience for himself, to resist invasions of it in the case of others; or their case may, by change of circumstances, become his own. It behooves him, too, in his own case, to give no example of concession, betraying the common right of independent opinion, by answering questions of faith which the laws have left between God and himself. Accept my affectionate salutations.

GBFM lzozozozozo

May it be to the world, what I believe it will be, (to some parts sooner, to others later, but finally to all,) the signal of arousing men to burst the chains under which monkish ignorance and superstition had persuaded them to bind themselves, and to assume the blessings and security of self-government. All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately, by the grace of God.
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Roger C. Weightman, June 24, 1826 (in the last letter he penned)

The whole history of these books [the Gospels] is so defective and doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and such tricks have been played with their text, and with the texts of other books relating to them, that we have a right, from that cause, to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine. In the New Testament there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded from an extraordinary man; and that other parts are of the fabric of very inferior minds. It is as easy to separate those parts, as to pick out diamonds from dunghills.
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Adams, January 24, 1814
In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own.
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Horatio G. Spafford, March 17, 1814

As you say of yourself, I too am an Epicurian. I consider the genuine (not the imputed) doctrines of Epicurus as containing everything rational in moral philosophy which Greece and Rome have left us.
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Short, Oct. 31, 1819

here are sosme of my thoughtz on christainaaizizyzizzoz zlzlzlzlzozozlzzozozoz:

Syllabus of an Estimate of the
Merit of the Doctrines of Jesus,
Compared with Those of Others.

In a comparative view of the Ethics of the enlightened nations of antiquity, of the Jews and of Jesus, no notice should be taken of the corruptions of reason among the ancients, to wit, the idolatry and superstition of the vulgar, nor of the corruptions of Christianity by the learned among its professors.

Let a just view be taken of the moral principles inculcated by the most esteemed of the sects of ancient philosophy or of their individuals; particularly Pythagoras, Socrates, Epicurus, Cicero, Epictetus, Seneca, Antoninus.

I. Philosophers.

1. Their precepts related chiefly to ourselves, and the government of those passions which, unrestrained, would disturb our tranquillity of mind.[Note] In this branch of philosophy they were really great.
2. In developing our duties to others, they were short and defective. They embraced, indeed, the circles of kindred and friends, and inculcated patriotism, or the love of our country in the aggregate, as a primary obligation: towards our neighbors and countrymen they taught justice, but scarcely viewed them as within the circle of benevolence. Still less have they inculcated peace, charity and love to our fellow men, or embraced with benevolence the whole family of mankind.
II. Jews.
1. Their system was Deism; that is, the belief in one only God. But their ideas of him and of his attributes were degrading and injurious.
2. Their Ethics were not only imperfect, but often irreconcilable with the sound dictates of reason and morality, as they respect intercourse with those around us; and repulsive and anti-social, as respecting other nations. They needed reformation, therefore, in an eminent degree.
III. Jesus.
In this state of things among the Jews, Jesus appeared. His parentage was obscure; his condition poor; his education null; his natural endowments great; his life correct and innocent: he was meek, benevolent, patient, firm, disinterested, and of the sublimest eloquence.

The disadvantages under which his doctrines appear are remarkable.

1. Like Socrates and Epictetus, he wrote nothing himself.
2. But he had not, like them, a Xenophon or an Arrian to write for him. I name not Plato, who only used the name of Socrates to cover the whimsies of his own brain. On the contrary, all the learned of his country, entrenched in its power and riches, were opposed to him, lest his labors should undermine their advantages; and the committing to writing his life and doctrines fell on unlettered and ignorant men, who wrote, too, from memory, and not till long after the transactions had passed.
3. According to the ordinary fate of those who attempt to enlighten and reform mankind, he fell an early victim to the jealousy and combination of the altar and the throne, at about thirty-three years of age, his reason having not yet attained the maximum of its energy, nor the course of his preaching, which was but of three years at most, presented occasions for developing a complete system of morals.
4. Hence the doctrines he really delivered were defective as a whole, and fragments only of what he did deliver have come to us mutilated, misstated, and often unintelligible.
5. They have been still more disfigured by the corruptions of schismatizing followers, who have found an interest in sophisticating and perverting the simple doctrines he taught, by engrafting on them the mysticisms of a Grecian sophist, frittering them into subtleties, and obscuring them with jargon, until they have caused good men to reject the whole in disgust, and to view Jesus himself as an impostor.
Notwithstanding these disadvantages, a system of morals is presented to us which, if filled up in the style and spirit of the rich fragments he left us, would be the most perfect and sublime that has ever been taught by man.
The question of his being a member of the Godhead, or in direct communication with it, claimed for him by some of his followers and denied by others, is foreign to the present view, which is merely an estimate of the intrinsic merits of his doctrines.

1. He corrected the Deism of the Jews, confirming them in their belief of one only God, and giving them juster notions of His attributes and government.
2. His moral doctrines, relating to kindred and friends were more pure and perfect than those of the most correct of the philosophers, and greatly more so than those of the Jews; and they went far beyond both in inculcating universal philanthropy, not only to kindred and friends, to neighbors and countrymen, but to all mankind, gathering all into one family under the bonds of love, charity, peace, common wants and common aids. A development of this head will evince the peculiar superiority of the system of Jesus over all others.
3. The precepts of philosophy, and of the Hebrew code, laid hold of actions only. He pushed his scrutinies into the heart of man; erected his tribunal in the region of his thoughts, and purified the waters at the fountain head.
4.He taught, emphatically, the doctrines of a future state, which was either doubted or disbelieved by the Jews, and wielded it with efficacy as an important incentive, supplementary to the other motives to moral conduct.

Yes, this is a big deal that is never really discussed. The conservatives retreat from or benign neglect of the academy has proved disastrous. Most non-critically thinking young people are P.C. drones and the women have polluted minds.

When being feminist and a blank slater appeared to become synonymous with being intelligent and forward thinking, this was a major loss for the pursuit of true equality as a social movement. Many lost the opportunity or motivation to progress or just be productive because, as Malcolm X would say, when you tell a person they’ve never done anything, they come to believe they can’t do anything.

An entire gender has been classed as villainous beasts, forgetting that every one of them had a mother. So whatever villainy they may embody, they got at least half of that from a woman.

Feminism is a psychogenic disease that needs to be purged from academia.

Yeah. Had three kids. Put all three through school including professional school. Still paying off their loans and helping out with their kids.

They (and their spouses) mostly voted for Obama x2. Don’t blame the boomers. The children voted for low growth, high taxes, and redistribution. They voted with the welfare mothers, blacks, and latinos, none of whom wish them well, and actually hate them in many cases.

Yeah, that’s why they raise troubled kids, precisely because there is no strong father there to teach strict values. Children growing up without fathers has to be the worst affliction outside of a disease. It’s cruel and we’re raising second-rate troubled human being that will be a strain on the society, not well-adjusted contributors. What parent in their right mind will do this to their own children? These women that buy into this are mentally defective themselves.

You hear so many commercials for foster families or for adopting older kids or for big brothers big sisters, etc….Liberals love such programs – it gives them something to do and feel good about themselves, but all of these kids they cater to are from troubled homes raised by single moms. Kids raised by a mother and a father don’t need such programs and the kindness of strangers.

what really makes me laugh is that, the more “socially acceptable” single motherhood is, the more its touted as something to be celebrated, the heavier the burden on our economy it becomes. women being women, cant see the fact that this isnt a solitary situation. as women they are incapable of seeing the consequences to their actions. feminism isnt an island.

the burden on the economy is picked up by men. even if we never realize it and most men go their whole lives without it ever occuring to them, nature will take its course.

as the men lose their incentive (sex, loyalty, security in their family) to work hard the burden on our economy will grow immense. without even realizing it the men will allow it to collapse.

the only other option is forced slavery of men. and as history has demonstrated, that never lasts long.

it will be at that point when the hypergamic nature of women will force a realization: men are once again better providers than government. men will once again offer the security that the perversion we call the welfare state once provided. there will be no other option. balance must return.

men will of course take care of the woman offering her love in times gone awry. not because we are dumb. because we are the more benevolent, less ruthless, most forgiving of the two genders. because we are better.

i hope to god though that the lesson is learned by us, the men, the ones that provide equality by giving of ourselves. i just hope we learn to hold on to our hard earned power the next time around.

Socialism is nothing but the exploitation of beta males for the sake of womens’ whims. Moreover, the vast majority will never even understand what you’re talking about if you bring it up. Arguments supporting patriarchy have become rare as hens’ teeth through calculated suppression and censorship by the Marxist intelligentsia, which is the entire liberal arts academy, pretty much..

over the past thirty years or so univeristies desouled women in prima noctae assocking sessins (some of tehm secretly taped iwthout thei girls conthent as the neocons like it best) and they sent the army forth to 1) transfer assetts form menz, 2) destory the family, 3) murder 50,000,000 unborn innocent souls, 4) hype and sell sub prime loans while wearing short skirts lzozlzlzlzllzlzlz 5) lure men into marriage iwth their coconpirators the ministers who front the legal system that does what no pimp would wever do–charge men for past use of a pussy lzolsoslslslslslslslslsls

the fembot army;s main corporate state job is to create debt debauchery destiutution debt divorce deconstruction and devastation lzozlzlzlz

and they have succeeded!! lzozlzlzlzlzlzl

today our debt deficit will be greater than the gnp!!!!1

the feminsimt movement cooinnded with the largest greatest increase of debt ever known to namankinds lzozlzlzlzl this is because womenz who stamp their little feet and bitch and complain and tranfer and destory welath and say “me me m em e more material welath for me me me me for my gina!!!! it’s for the children (even though women aborted/killed/vacuumed 50,000,000 fetuss by their choice alone) lzozlzlz it takes a village–fund my village where we get to bang alphas and the betas pay for it whether we cuckold them in tehir homes or via the welfare state zlozlzozlzzlzl” and they bitch and complain and talk about handbags and butthex and twilight vampires and enocurage girls to long for and lust after undead bloodsucking vampire twilight monsters and butthexing douchebags and otehr things which make their bginas tingle repalced menz at univeristies menz who built invent iengineer buuikld invent reason truth write great books read great bookz think lzozlzl eb=engineer lzozlzlzozlzl replaced exaltation eand greatness with bdebt debuachery destitution lzozlz

short beta men rose fast in teh unievristy as they were handed fiat bernanke cash fronm helicopter ben and they used it to surrpound themselves with syocphantic harems of womenze as all teh betas love honor worship tucker max their ultimate master because he rhymes with goldman sax and also he butthexes girls and films it woithout teh girlths ocnthent and the weekly stanadrd neocns repeat his lies lzozlzlzlzzl that he is six foot tall zlozzlzllzlzlzlzl honoring their #1 butthexual hero lzozlzlzl

so anyeways teh fiat masters trianed owmen in the arts of divorce debuachery deseefxation destruction lozlzolzlzlz and abortion and debt creation, and as womenze rose to power on teh ffront lines of the epreemptive wars against teh unborn they murdered 50,000,000 since rose vs. wade they deconstructed and debuached tehc ulture on campuses as when yhou put womenze in charge it soons becomes all butthex all the time as priscilia paintion woemnze editor in chief of simon and schuster is publishing tucker max’s next book zlzolslssslslsoslsoslzozlzlzlzlz c hecks che-=checks it out peoples are saying and speaking out about the way womenze are debucahing defiling and butthexing the culture lozlzlzlzlzl:

RE: ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, Secretive Tapings of Anal Sex without The Girl’s Consent, Corporate Douchebaggery, and the Epic Failure of I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell

Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. –http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260

“Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” –http://gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php

Dear Ms. Painton,

I and my colleagues in the ART, FILM & LITERATURE GUILD have a couple questions regarding the direction you are taking Simon and Schuster in. Why are you guys/gals hating on art, literature, culture and America? It was recently brought to our attention that you are intent on publishing Tucker Max’s ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, and that your company actually gave him a $300,000 advance for his fart art. As the editor in chief of Simon and Schuster, owned the CBS corporation, do you truly believe Assholes Finish First? It is oft said that girls like “bad boys.” Does Tucker’s fart art douchebag wit titillate and excite you? Is that why you are publishing and profiting from it? Did you laugh during Tucker’s recent film flop when what’s-his-name stated that overweight women aren’t real people? Do you smile smugly when your billion-dollar corporation profits from douchebaggery?

“Over at the Washington, D.C., premiere, Max’s video minion ridicules both Vietnamese and African-American women, the former for being employed as a pedicurist, and the latter for having a name he finds funny.”

Does this make you laugh Ms. Painton? It is not too late to choose the right direction for Simon and Schuster and CBS and walk away from publishing Assholes Finish First . At most it will bring in a few pennies, which will lead everyone to conclude that you and CBS aren’t in it for the money, but just the debauchery and destruction of the culture. As Tucker Max pointed out, the feminist movement empowered women and gave them the right to choose the art they affiliated with and promote. So now, with all the power in your hands, what will you chose on behalf of women all over the world? Please do us proud and choose the right thing.

“The ad campaign for the new flick “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” includes slogans like “Deaf Girls Can’t Hear You Coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding!).””

Why is corporate America, under your direction Ms. Painton, forcing epic “Richard Kelly” fail fart art and film on the common public? Do you also find secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent to be entertaining and titillating art?

Let’s talk for a sec about something Tucker glamorizes and pretends is funny in his ‘book’: filming a naked women in his bedroom without her consent. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that while he’s doing this he is coaxing the girl to have anal sex with him, an exploitative act that a guy like him probably especially enjoys.

Do you and the CBS Corporation find this entertaining? As you know, sodomy is a sin in the Old Testament as is sex out of wedlock and fornication. What is your motivation in working with those who promote and profit from secretive tapings of anal sex?

Do you find such “literature” and “art” to be representative of Simon and Schuster and CBS?

Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. –http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260

Ms. Painton–do you find that entertaining? Is it good literature? Do you consider demeaning stories about having sex with midgets good literature? Do you consider it good business to make fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities so as to bolster your bottom line?

What is driving you to publish Assholes Finish First ? What are your motivations? Money? America does not want Tucker Max, as demonstrated this past weekend at the boxoffice. Do you find these signs to be entertaining/a good CBS investment?

It seems that America believes otherwise as Richard Kelly and Tucker Max’s I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell has proven to be a colossal artistic and financial failure.

“Not faring so well, however, was the Tucker Max adaptation I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell, which took in $369,000 from 120 theaters with a well-below-average $3,075 per-screen average.” — http://www.movieweb.com/news/NEdXykfeBDXwhe

So Priscilla, please tell us about your douchetastic love affair with Tucker Max and his fart art. Does it really titillate you as a woman and feminist? Say it isn’t so! Is this good Simon and Schuster/CBS branding? Why did your massive billion-dollar corporation reward Tucker with a $300,000 advance?

“Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” –http://gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php

“Max may have to concentrate on his agent style business moving forward because he’s running out of material. He’s received a $300,000 advance for a second version of his drunken, sexual exploits – a tome that will contain the stories not ripe enough for the first cut.” — http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/11/tucker_max_sxsw/

Are you proud of Simon & Schuster and your corporation? Funding and encouraging hype, failure, douchebaggery, debauchery, lies, secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent, and making fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities. Is that what attracts you to Tucker Max, or is it the epic artistic and financial failure of his film?

the title makes no sense. *beep* might finish first in some silly women’s eyes, but they epic fail in reality, as demonstrated by tucker’s epic fart art film fail, which priscilla painton is pretendning not to notice.

What’s up with women these days?

It seems the more they run things, the more they try to force douchebag fart art on everyone:

“11:17: The girl starts saying something about what a horrible person I am. I stare at her, but I am not listening. I am preparing myself. I am B-Rabbit. This is the final battle rap. I will win the hostile crowd:

[I interrupt the fat girl] “Ward, I think you’re being a little hard on the Beaver, [as I point to each in turn] so is Eddie Haskell, Wally, and Miss Cleaver.”

[To the fat guy with greasy hair in the camo vest] “Look out everyone! It’s the Pillsbury Commando! Hey Chunk, when was the last time you washed your hair? Does it give you more hit points to have that grease helmet? I hate to break the news, but +5 defense only counts in Dungeons and Dragons.”

[To the ugly Asian girl] “Why you no rike me? You want me frip over? You no piss me off! ME FIND YOU IN POCKING ROT!! YOU NO TAKE MING ARIVE!!”

[To the small frail dork–I notice he has a lazy eye] “Dude–Look at me when I’m talking to you–BOTH EYES AT ONCE. Are you really this ugly or are you just playing? EVERYONE, BE CAREFUL, THIS GUY LURKS UNDER THE STAIRS AND TRIES TO LICK YOUR SHOES WHEN YOU PASS BY!”

[To the original fatty, pause for effect] “Why do you do this to yourself? WHY DO YOU DO THIS TO YOURSELF? Look, I’m gonna give you some advice-leave the party, take the geek squad with you, go to Denny’s, order about 10 Grand Slam Breakfasts, and eat your pain away. Won’t be the first time will it?”

11:19: I am finished. The kitchen is quiet, except for Eddie and Rich laughing. The four freaks are completely speechless. Everyone is staring at me. I blurt out, “WHAT? I’m pretty sure it’s what Jesus would’ve done.” Eddie and Rich promptly remove me from the kitchen.”

Is Priscilla Painton publishing tucker’s next book for the love of literature, art, or money?

‘Cause it seems that those who work with tucker generally hate and lose literature, art, and money.

“A Site about the Divorce Regime, Family Court Corruption,
and Government’s War on Fathers”

“The divorce regime is the most totalitarian institution ever to arise in the United States. Its operatives in the family courts and the social service agencies recognize no private sphere of life. “The power of family court judges is almost unlimited,” according to Judge Robert Page of the New Jersey family court. “Social workers are perceived to have nearly unlimited power,” a San Diego Grand Jury concludes. “Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Total immunity [enjoyed by social workers] is absolute power.”

The divorce regime is responsible for much more than “ugly divorces,” “nasty custody battles,” and other clichés. It is the most serious perpetrator of human and constitutional rights violations in America today. Because it strikes the most basic institution of any civilization – the family – the divorce regime is a threat not only to social order but to civil freedom. It is also almost completely unopposed. No political party and no politicians question it. No journalists investigate it in any depth. A few attorneys have spoken out, but they are eventually suspended or disbarred. Some academics have written about it, but they soon stop. No human rights or civil liberties groups challenge it, and some positively support it. Very few “pro-family” lobbies question it. This is because the divorce regime operates through money, political power, and fear.” — http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/

–http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

Have you seen/read END THE FED by Ron Paul? “Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
–Vince Vaughn

When you think about it, Tucker Max was the Fed’s ultimate creation–a soulless, debased douchebag:

“My name is Tucker Max, and I am an *beep*

Think about it–Tucker’s motto @ http://tuckermax.com could be the Fed’s motto:
“I get excessively drunk via inflating the currency at inappropriate times, disregard social norms (funding feminism/debauchery & debasement of the family/currency/culture/tucker max(educated at the Fed’s University of Chicago’s School of Economics (school of freakanomics) and Duke scholarship)), indulge every whim/war, ignore the consequences of my actions/bubbles/bailouts, fund idiots and posers and tucker-max-like CEOs, sleep with more women than is safe or reasonable/luring them with fiat currency & a fiat-funded bus, and just generally act like a raging darko/douchebag/dickhead.”

What do you think of Ron Paul’s new book–End the Fed?

Amazon.com: End the Fed (9780446549196): Ron Paul: Books

Review for End The Fed
“Rarely has a single book not only challenged, but decisively changed my mind. “
–Arlo Guthrie

“Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
–Vince Vaughn

Vince Vaughn is a far, far better actor/director/writer than Tucker Max, so it makes sense that Tucker and his jealous friends at the Fed detest Arlo Guthrie and Vince Vaughan as well as art, film, and literature.

The book has much better reviews and is far-higher ranked than Tucker’s douchey books/film/trailer–Five solid stars!

And like the Fed, tucker privatizes all the profits of his private jet while sharing all the risk with his volunteer employees, who work for free.

“Feminism which espoused “women’s rights” actually has driven femininity underground, torn the sexes asunder, and stripped woman of recognition for being wives and mothers, roles essential to their own fulfillment, to men, and to children and society.” –http://www.savethemales.ca/

It’s impressive that you’re being honest about its ills. Most people refuse to admit that it’s the least desirable choice for raising kids, second only to being raised by gays, which has to be the first most undesirable choice.

I once told a feminist single mother if she needed help that badly she could come to my home and scrub my toilet for $8/hour while I read her the bible. If she wasnt interested then she wasnt really all that needy.

“A massive transfer of wealth from quasi-cuckolded beta males to feckless females is the *whole point*, the UR PURPOSE, of feminism.”

YES! How maddening to defend “patriarchy” (ie rational civilization) against the screeching harpies and idiots who call it unfair/oppressive when it is they who advocate the most monstrously unjust system in all human history.

Marriage is an economic contract. The male “sells” his surplus labour to the female in exchange for her reproductive ability. The female “sells” her reproductive ability to the male in exchange for his surplus labour. And *that* is why patriarchy was true equality and justice.

“there is no reason that a teen should not be financially and emotionally assisted for her choice to have a family” no reason!! her choice?! So any teen that gets knocked up should enjoy the endless bounty of the welfare state, funded by the taxation of mostly white, beta males. There’s no hope for shrikes like these, just ridicule them until they collapse in tears and shame.

“The things children need: economic livelihood, emotional support and an education, are not dependent on a nuclear family structure.”
———————————
why bother educating the children if you dont expect their family structure to be self-sufficient even in theory when they become adults? whats the difference your never going to be self-reliant anyways? Why not just give people welfare if they are poor and not bothering anyone and let that be that and leave all self-improvement to voluntary arrangements? no one would perish in the streets.

Anti-feminists have been well represented on Twitter but google plus is more important if you want things to be indexed and found. But, over there, there are fewer guys with fake names that can combat the arrogant upper middle class people who think they can get away with using their real names to call half the country (the conservatives including businessmen who might consider hiring them in the future) neanderthals, misogynists and worse names. In reality they may never know the doors that shut on them because they were willing to post so freely about their unvarnished political views from their work accounts, but, for anti-feminists, some of you guys need to get over there with pseudonyms and find things like the VAWA posts from today where they are saying that “the Republicans are dinosaurs who didn’t learn from the election that they just can’t stand in the way of women’s rights anymore”.

We are losing the battle in comment sections and facebook and google plus, so some of you guys with time on your hands might want to create a personality and use that to comment and make status updates. You can do quick searches in each of these places and I am sure the liberals you find will often experience, for the first time in their lives, someone articulate who can and will expose them to the other point of view.

CH should definitely use a gmail address to create a google plus account to represent his hallowed halls.

You are so right and that’s an awesome thing to do, but I have to tell you, I fight with those bitches all the time and they are exasperating. They have been brainwashed from the cradle, so how can you banish this line of thinking from their minds?

Eh, who cares? You can bring a horse to water but you can’t make it drink…just keep repeating the logic of the red pill and laugh at them as they fail to come up with any response…it’s all you really can do and there’s no sense in expending any energy trying to do anything else.

That’s the price of living in a society. It comes with responsible things that limit personal freedom but provide some level of security to both individual and soceity. The balance is always open to a how much of which is good equation.

I’ve found that it’s useless to argue with women over that issue. Their brains seem to be wired into wanting the whole village to help raise the child. Under this system all the women get to pass on their genes and get money from other women and men. And, most of the men dont get to have any of their own children and have to pay for other people’s kids.

They seem to have some type of blind spot in that they cant comprehend a man being so bold that he takes personal responsibility and only wants to pay for his own child.

Gold I tell you, gold! I would ask one other thing of single moms. When their bastard spawn turn out to be meth tweakers, crack hos or even worse, sociology majors, said single moms should do the honorable thing and take their own lives. Because they have, at that point, utterly failed as human beings. Happy Thanksgiving.

You mom was such a cunt she abandoned you, since she had first dibs, and your father, being the responsible (beta) father that he is, raised you instead. With you attitude I think foster care would have been best.

There is nothing wrong with teenage or single motherhood. The things children need: economic livelihood, emotional support and an education, are not dependent on a nuclear family structure.>/i<

and then she says this,

there is no reason that a teen should not be financially and emotionally assisted for her choice to have a family.

Is she not contradicting herself?

If teen moms need to be assisted emotionally and financially THEN they can not provide by themselves what children need, thus they need either a family structure – be it a husband or her parents providing her with a roof over her head, free food and free money to buy clothes and diapers – or its surrogate ; the government.

You expect logic from a womyn? Like seriously? All they excel at is sophistry. If we remove verbal IQ from the equation, womyn are significantly less intelligent than men. Perhaps a full standard deviation or more.

I do my part to help keep the nuclear family alive by banging taken girls. After all, she’d divorce him to find someone who satisfies her better if she didn’t get it in the pooper once in a while from guys on the side like me.

Why does your honor come into play? If you have a slut wife or girlfriend, leave her and find someone else. What a slut wife or gf suggests is that you are bad at picking woman and/or you are not able to make her beholden to you and/or you stayed on past the relationship’s expiration date (by not noticing or not caring or whatever). Anyway you look at it, a cheating woman is your fault.

Most men would be fine with walking away if a wife cheats, but the fact hes going to lose half of his stuff when he was the one that was cheated on, makes me realize I cant blame him if he blasts both of their heads off with a revolver.

This. If he was satisfying her sexually, she wouldn’t need to find it elsewhere. If it hadn’t been me the night we met, it would’ve been some other guy.

He was a shitty lay when they DID fuck (actually you guys would like him, all he did was make her get him off and then bail, he didn’t give a shit if she got off, what a badass alpha right??? lol she spent a lot of lonely horny nights txting me finishing herself off with her vibe while he played x-box downstairs), but he actually turned her down for sex pretty frequently, which is insane because she’s a hot little firecracker, but it sounded like the magic had died down for him since they’d been together since high school (he was into such boring vanilla sex that it’s no wonder it got boring for him) and he has a lower sex drive than her which is a recipe for disaster.

I think they should’ve talked and had an honest/open conversation about their sex life before getting hitched, and I suggested that to her a few times, but people would rather go through an expensive wedding and legally bind themselves to eachother for life than dare have a dreaded “akward conversation”. People do it every day, whether that conversation should be about their beliefs, how they want to raise their kids, how they’ll split parental duties, who’s going to stay home from work to take care of the kids, etc.

It’s not my place to fix society and babysit everyone, I just do my thing within the fucked up system. I hope she doesn’t txt me, but I know women too well to think that she won’t.

With regards to alpha fucks beta bucks stuff, this girl would be 100% on-board with me getting her pregnant and having him raise it. But I can’t guarantee he wouldn’t get a paternity test, so I wouldn’t do that.

This all sounds like she’s a horrible piece of shit human being, but she’s just a girl, like the rest of them. The deeper into the Secret Society you go, the more of this you see from girls you’d never expect it from. Do you think any of her friends or co-workers know any of this shit about her? Fuck no, she’s an angel/madonna to them. This is going on all around you, if you refuse to believe it, you’re still choking on the red-pill.

From what I read about it, they almost never went through with it. It was usually very hard to prove, and mercy was always used. The punishment was on the books to put the fear of God into married women over cheating and the men who cheated with them. What usually ended up happening if there was irrefutable proof, is they would force the husband to divorce his wife immediately so that no pregnancy and confusion about the child’s father would result. If she were already pregnant, the child would be labeled a bastard. Also there was a strong sense that if your wife sleeps with another man you can’t stay with her and still garner any respect. Her punishment, she ended up with nothing usually – no property, no shelter, no children – but that’s better than getting the death penalty for cheating.

1) every man learned some basic game so they could legitimately understand how to keep their women attracted instead of actively digging their head into the sand refusing to take the red-pill and accept reality, and…

2) if every man objectively looked at marriage as a contract and listened to the MRAs when they warn about what a foolish notion getting married is instead of caving to social/peer pressure…

If those two things happened, on a mass, wide-spread level…guys like me wouldn’t exist and prosper.

I hope that day comes, for the sake of men in general, but until it does (and remember a big part of WHY it doesn’t come is that men ACTIVELY refuse to learn or accept game AND shit on guys who do learn it so they can get a pat on the back from feminists), I’m going to keep putting quarters in the faulty slot machine that keeps paying out till the machine is removed or the repair guy gets there.

I rarely comment but wanted to drop my $0.02 on the notion that all men are screwed once they get married. I disagree. A man will get screwed if he marries solely based on sexual attraction or is desperately beta/omega enough to marry some feminazicunt or a low grade (social value speaking) slut who has ridden the cock carousel; both types whom he should have known that they were a no-go as far as LTR not to talk of marriage is concerned.

As a woman, the reason I resonate with this site is because of the raw truth it espouses in relation to male-female relationship dynamics. However, I gather that while the principles work best for short term game/ lays, some of the LTR principles are flawed and may not be holding men to a high enough standard when choosing LTR status partners.

Without the obvious implication of sounding all internet bad-ass, is it so hard to find girls like me, feminine mid twenties 7.5’s-8.5’s, who come from good enough middle upper class backgrounds, with their own high paying jobs who still want to play traditional wife/motherly submissive roles? I admit I am “foreign” in that I immigrated here when I was in my teens, but still….is it really that rare??

Even if I decide to take five years off to raise my children, I doubt that in the event I get divorced from my husband, HE would be the one that get’s screwed because a)I have a high paying job that will be just slightly less than my husband’s so no spousal support there and b) my Husband can apply for joint custody and not even pay child support.

I am not as eloquent as so many posters here so I am not sure if I got my point across as well as id like, but I feel that a lot of the guys here either made the mistake of marrying too FAR down (the man always almost marries down, this I know but how much of a gradient is too far) or b) want to marry someone much younger but do not want someone with the prospect of being independent enough to make their own money (work minded) so that in the event the marriage dissolves, the man is not left “screwed”.

And what about the woman? a woman who has been married and had kids in said marriage has a significant drop in DMV. My biggest phobia is getting married and having kids AND divorcing. It is the reason I have turned down a proposal. I can live with being older and still single and either a)cougar-ing my way through life or b)find a beta who I actually like but I CANNOT and WILL NOT get married right now and have kids with someone who I doubt will be there and that’s why dating an alpha, even one who is interested in LTR is hard (dating one now) because in the back of my head I know this guy is less likely to stick around in 5, 10, 20 years.

If I have a son, I will be damned if I let him marry someone who can’t cook. clean, mend to her womanly duties, but I will also be damned if I let him marry some no college educated waitress who is a 10 and a decade younger at least someone who might not continue working while they are married but should they divorce, the judge can readily imput income into her salary and maybe order he pays spousal support but only for a year MAX while she gets her foot back into the work force! Just saying

This. Though I wouldn’t say he deserves it, it just is what it is. Marriage is a legally binding contract that takes away every ability a man has to express his alpha qualities. In this day and age it is specifically designed to force a guy into a beta role that his woman will, ultimately, lose attraction for.

The more the Manosphere, MRA, and MGTOW (and even PUAs, tho we don’t care as much because it’s just common sense to us) spread to mean that marriage is a shitty uneven deal and will fuck them over and a generation of men refusing to get suckered into marriage arises, the better.

This is why I share my story about what a horrible piece of shit I am lol Guys who are still attached to the fantasy that they’re going to find the perfect Madonna and she’s going to be faithful and they’re going to get married and everyone else just sucks but HE’LL make it work…when they read my shit, hopefully it gives them pause and makes them reconsider volunteering to go to the slaughter.

I have pics and vids of her fingering her ass and using toys on herself, with her engagement ring on display. She thought it was hot to wear her engagement ring while we fucked (more “wrong” = more hot), and I encouraged her to do it because I just like fucked up shit like that.

Does that count as proof? lol I was going to fuck her in her wedding dress before the wedding day, but she called our relationship off before that.

If you met her you would never ever know that she was like this behind closed doors. All it takes for most women is making them feel like they won’t be judged, making them feel good emotions through game, and being a good lay.

I’ve seen worse shit than this, but you guys would never believe me and the guys who don’t go out would just say “well that’s just slutty drunk bar sluts, that’s not like the high-class women *I* know!”. Maybe I’ll write a book one day lol

I’ve applied quite a few of your tips over the course of this year, i’ve gotta thank you for the heavy loads that i’ve been busting into the mouths of the local female population, cheers :).

One question tho that I think you answered somewhere in the archives that I can’t find – how do you keep things on a non-committed sexual level in the sense of girls being cool that you’re boning other chicks? The past month I was fucking four girls (on different nights) but they kept pressing the exclusivity issue and it was too much headfuck to have four girls who thought they were my girlfriend so I pruned the fun down to just the hottest one who cooked me the most food.

Anyway, that ended this week and I’m back to square one and ready to get more girls into my moshpit but this time I want to handle the ‘are you my boyfriend’ question a bit better than ‘sh..sh…sure!’. Might be above my game level but I fancy giving it a shot anyway, just wondered how you handle that sorta question with frame etc.

Ya really is right about making women get wild. You have to put them at ease with their fantasies and inclinations and if you do, you’ll have them eating out of your hand. Women are inherently more sensual than men, but it needs to be warmed up.

On a related note, I know more than one alpha who bangs hot young single girls. On the other hand, I’ve known, or indirectly known of, more than one self-proclaimed player who brags of banging married women. When pressed on the subject, said married women turn out to be 48-year-old white trash walruses.

I believe the stories, and whatever embellishments appended are fine. There is a real point to be made in them.

Unfortunately, the eagerly volunteered, kinky-fantasy element obscures the wisdom. Fetishists by definition mistake side-effect for cause and thereby seek to make side-effects central to their behavior. Who wouldn’t want to cuckold a naïve beta? Who doesn’t want to pummel the truth out of a bridezilla’s carefully constructed ceremony of lies especially when she wants it all to be exposed more than anyone? The transgressive orgasms are the best ones. Especially the ones that uncover the truth at the same time. Right?

Wrong. The pursuit of transgression contains all its charms. After the cum-down, then we have to chase the dragon again, for the bigger better transgression. The idea has been so well-known for so long that you can read about it in Augustine circa fourth century. Look up “concupiscence.” (On second thought — don’t. The idea is expressed in a manner few of you are ready to interpret. Suffice it to say, men better than you have encountered and resolved this issue centuries before you were born.)

But don’t let my situating a moral truth along the prospects of long-term happiness get in the way of a good cum-and-done story. That’s the very truth such tail-chasers seek to avoid in the relentless, accelerating chase-unto-exhaustion. Contentment is no part of their calculation. So the embellished tales will be alluring to poor men who know only lies and discontent. Conveniently, the downside/costs/penalties of such a superficial approach to life never disturb the narrative. It would ruin the fantasy for others.

Forget the unrestrained violence even the most betaized cuckold might be driven to visit upon his humiliators. The behavior itself poisons those engaged in it: they cease the ability to even recognize the possibility of virtue anymore. They “laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in [their] midst.” They have seen such things and done such things that skew their perspective permanently, not unlike the mortician’s gradual inability to see people as anything other than bags of animated, uncut, and pre-embalmed meat. You have seen the depths of a woman’s depravity, and what a fun ride! But now you know firsthand that every woman from 8 to 80 is nothing more than a friction ride, a walking hole good for one thing, who simply hasn’t been introduced to her subhuman destiny yet. Call it sexual PTSD.

What’s especially sad to witness is fantasy overtaking a man to the extent that he thinks he can present it as a serious guide to life. Still sadder: the inexperienced dupes who, from a distance, buy into such big-fish stories as heroic rather than tragic for everyone involved.

“What’s especially sad to witness is fantasy overtaking a man to the extent that he thinks he can present it as a serious guide to life. Still sadder: the inexperienced dupes who, from a distance, buy into such big-fish stories as heroic rather than tragic for everyone involved.”

And what’s even sadder is the new type of lifestyle he tries to sell these empty-headed dupes. He preaches to the pathetic how they should live their whole lives as cads, never accepting any responsibility, floating from one slut to another, cuckolding other men, taking on one of these said sluts (maybe two or three, depending on how much self-control the cad or dupe has) getting her pregnant, and refusing to marry her while she raises his kids as a single mom (ironically, the subject of this thread) and he continues living like a loser drifter rake chasing after sluts and their vaginas. Now you tell me if that’s not the example of a slave in spite of himself? Show me a man that can conquer his urges, and I will show you a real alpha. Alphas are not addicted little boys bound to repeat the same behavior like mice chasing after cheese. A life of emptiness and addiction is the nightmare he is selling them. Is he that unfulfilled?

For starters who wants to have kids with a slut? And, when the slut chases after another loser like their father and he molests the kids, what is NotReally going to do, or will he even care? All those idiots that agree with him should ask themselves.

NotReally is one of the by-products of the Left – no values, no standards, no recognition of quality or excellence, no acceptance of responsibility, no differentiating between good and bad – just mediocrity, stupidity, and demented behavior.

At least if he were smart, he would have confined these ignorant comments of his to the two recent threads about game. He shouldn’t have posted them on a thread like this discussing the ills of single motherhood.

Matthew hey man thanks for your valuable insight into some valuable insight. You’re a shining star in a vast universe of ignorance. Thank you for using really big words and various flourishes co-opted from your favorite 17th and 18th century Philosophers. Check out Schopenhauer you guys would like mad get along. Also thank you for elevating the discourse here. It is so lame that people come here to discuss banging chicks and how they do. I think it is much more amazing (intellectually, naturally) that you can construct various Elaborate strawmen and write paragraph after paragraph arguing over some semantically irrelevant point that then encourages your faithful followers to come out in frenzied droves to applaud you and not point out that strangely none of what you’ve written has to do with girls. Anyway keep up the good fight and ill see you over at fark.com and 4chan 🙂 o
L

Yeahokcool, if I may, King has a sort of “intense” writing style (not too unlike Martin Luther King, heheheh) that moves one to take it perhaps more personally than one should. It may seem a bit overly morbid or judgmental, but I don’t believe he intends it to be so. He’s simply laying things out with as much precision as possible, so as to be well understood.

What I believe he’s trying to say is simply that you “can’t un-see the horror” once you’ve seen it. It’s like catching your dear, straight laced parents or grandparents in the throes of carnal lust. You can guess that it happened at least enough times to produce offspring, but actually seeing it happen, hearing the noises, and all, puts you dead center of the reality. It is quite traumatic because it alters your perception in a way that you did not want it altered. Understanding that something happens and seeing it happen are different things.

Now imagine, as a consenting adult, being turned on by it and joining the fun. There are good reasons one wouldn’t and probably shouldn’t do such a thing aside of freaking people out. There are reasons that even if they would welcome the company, one shouldn’t go there. Those reasons why one wouldn’t want to join an orgy with one’s elders are the same that one should take care when pushing certain limits with anyone else as well.

Using myself as an example, my stimulation bar is a bit higher than average. I like it rough. However, when in public or around people who are sensitive to sexual violence, I am careful not to over expose them to foreplay between myself and my boyfriend. I don’t want them to become comfortable with it. There are also some dark places I am sure I can lead a man to, that I do not because I understand that fun as it may be at the moment, it will change them, and it will change me.

Experiences change you. That’s all he’s really trying to say. Don’t underestimate the power of experiences to shape your perception.

On the contrary, Nicole, I do intend to be judgmental. Cowards are afraid to judge, and reprobates (with a secret conscience) are afraid to be judged.

What you don’t understand about boys like these is that they shrink from the idea of righteous judgment, and so they spend their energy denying the possibility that judgment itself exists. The very twerps who assess the qualities of women without hesitation fall back on “judgmentalism” whenever the gaze turns to them. And why this retreat? Because they still know that sunlight disinfects. The moment the pitiless gaze of justice turns to them they will have nothing to offer in defense.

Which is why readers of this site — those of you with the cognitive and moral capacity to follow the argument — should understand the scurrying beta cowardice just beneath the “alpha” disguise of these quick-to-squeal poseurs. Most of you sit and entertain the patent contradictions from one sentence to the other. The tool who brags about how great he is with women in one post, shrinks and peeps meekly, “Don’t you ever get tired of being better than everyone else?” in the next.

This brand of veiled equalism is the last defense of the man without assets. They fall back on their milkwater relativism for lack of anything of substance to say beyond a reassertion of their increasingly uncredible excellence. What should be clear to the advanced thinkers of this site is how such behavior is evidence of a crypto-betatude: “non-judgmentalism” and unearned claims to equality are the essence of the feminist project. These anti-virtues along with “tolerance” rose hand-in-hand with the feminizing of the culture. Men assert and then demonstrate their worth. Women and betas think gaseous self-puffery suffices to give them an equal place at the table among men.

Now here comes one of them trying to instruct us about how things “really” are. A boy who had an evil orgasm and thinks he can deliver the world a discourse on moral sentiments. A chucklecunt who can’t even keep from lol’ing nervously in print like a cornered airhead.

Take or leave my criticism, fuck if I care. If you don’t understand the grounds of its validity, I don’t want your fickle kind beside me in the trenches anyway.

I left you a reply yesterday but it didn’t post. I have said much of what you wrote in your follow-up to Nicole.

Of course you intend to be judgmental. Only cowards are afraid to say anything because they worry about being attacked by spineless idiots who have no logic or morality. Someone has to speak up, or we’re all headed to the abyss. Please continue commenting.

Many of these guys never had anyone speak to them in such a truthful blunt manner about morality and doing the right thing. It so out of style, which is why we find ourselves in the predicament we’re in. Morality and honor have been replace with doing what feels good and instant gratification – 2 marks of the beast of the Left.

Guys like NotReally and the feminists are two sides of the same coin. The NotRellys can’t live independently without feminism, as feminism created them. They need feminism to live. No feminism they parish.

That’s why he keeps pounding the idea that all women are the same type of slut that will succumb to his brand of sexual gratification. Every woman on her wedding day in her wedding dress can end up sleeping with you, just given the chance, he says. His arrogance and ignorance have no bounds. Anyone who believes him is just as immature, if not highly lacking common sense. There is a time and a place for everything. Feminists and NotReallys mingling everything together, so that your mind cannot distinguish good from bad, right from wrong, moral from immoral, the list goes on and on. It all means exactly same for them, which is why everything is permitted.

“That’s why he keeps pounding the idea that all women are the same type of slut that will succumb to his brand of sexual gratification. Every woman on her wedding day in her wedding dress can end up sleeping with you, just given the chance, he says.”

Given the right set of conditions, the right situation and the right value differential then of course they’ll cheat. You can’t buy into the idea that women succumb to men on one hand and then expect a guiding principle or ‘good girl’ gene to stop hypergamy in it’s tracks on the other.

Though I’m positive many would disagree, I do not think that the notch value is dependent on the media beauty of the women. Neither the sensual value of a positive experience nor the horror of a negative experience is made better or worse by the woman’s looks, to a reasonable degree. I say this not as a generalization about humanity, but specifically in reference to the outliers who are the men who actually get frequent non committal sex. For all the bragging, there is no way that you can be as you are and have the same gauge as an omega who wanks to porn constantly and can’t tolerate what a woman looks like without body makeup or airbrushing.

I pretend to suspend disbelief and keep quiet about this specific matter usually, but since the subject has come up, my desire to keep this truth contained has diminished. All you players have seen your fair share of cellulite, saggy tits, stretch marks, scars, and a variety of other defects common to humanity, or you haven’t had the numbers you claim. It’s one or the other. Either you are a high testosterone sex machine who seeks and finds beauty in a variety of women, or you are a wanker. As an alpha, your women may be of a specific weight class and grooming standard, but after that it’s all about what they’ve got to offer.

Most alphas I know though, have a pretty wide range that I’m privy to because I do not make the mistake of presuming that there is a woman they can shag who they are not shagging. They relate to women mostly with their penis, and usually have such a high sex drive and high confidence that they would reward the nice old lady who did a good job altering their pants, just as soon as they would seduce the hotties who orbit them in the club. Others just only see the hotties because the old ladies have the sense to keep their mouths shut, or the observers are unable to accept a reality that they haven’t lived but think they know from the television.

I know what goes on because I have players in the family, and some friends who also get around. I’ve seen some young pretty things limping down the hallways of my uncles’ houses. I’ve awakened and stumbled into the kitchen of the same places to find some big mama or another scrambling eggs. I’ve seen dudes with a hot chick wrapped around their leg one day, come to me a few days later trying to get a bit of this bounce with straight up caveman game.

This is why when King writes of people over selling the benefits of sport shagging and not speaking of the downside or socially inconvenient bits, it rings true to me. I know the nature of the beast.

You catch some hot ones, you catch some not so hot ones. You had a good time? Then it’s all good. I don’t think anybody should invalidate your experiences so long as they were good for all parties involved.

But Plum, for some women, as for some men, the only right situation to betray anyone is with a complex arrangement of levers, pulleys, ropes, and their dead body.

Someone who would suicide before they would betray a faithful friend is probably not going to betray their faithful spouse. There are some people in this world who have honor.

It is not that they are especially altruistic. Something in their sense of self and self worth is connected to not being a dick to people who are cool with them.

That many or most are screwed up a certain way does not negate the existence of people who are not. No matter how many cheating bitches you encounter, and no matter how and what ways you bang them, there will be some who simply do not feel that a cad, how ever attractive, is actually worth more than a man who can dominate her more than a day.

Even the fantasies women have about cads is that the man will want to keep her but not lose his mojo while doing so. Women want to be held not briskly brushed past.

So while I applaud men’s efforts to get their needs met and learn to pick up, it is a good idea to know your place. Just like chicks who aren’t worth keeping, bitches have an expiration date.

First, wanted to correct one sentence that I wrote with a typo:
“They need feminism to live. No feminism they perish” (as opposed to parish).
___________________________________________
@Plumnuts
“Given the right set of conditions, the right situation and the right value differential then of course they’ll cheat.”

Given the right conditions, most people would also commit murder. Given the right conditions, most people would even commit cannibalism. Key phrase, “given the right conditions.” What are the right conditions for a woman to sleep with a rake in her wedding dress wearing her engagement ring, days before her wedding? She is a fucking slut is what she is. Those are her right conditions. Are they the right conditions for every women? No.

There is no doubt that everyone has a price. For that woman the price is low or nil. She is in mockery mode; she mocks everything and nothing is scared to her. I bet you, she would also be a bad mother, is not a trustworthy friend either, and cheats in other areas of her life as well. People like her have a low-threshold of dishonesty. We all can be dishonest at some point, especially if our survival is involved, but this woman has no reason for this, just the thrill of getting away with it. I assure you, most women would not sleep with another guy days before their marriage just for the hell of it. I’m not saying it doesn’t exists, just that it’s not likely, unless it’s a problematic girl, and her fiancé is an idiot who doesn’t know who she really is. However, that model of a woman should not be accepted as the norm, and NotReally’s escapades should be taken with a large grain of salt. Furthermore, guys that emulate this lifestyle past college are BIG losers. It doesn’t get you anywhere in life. It’s a life without a purpose. Your purpose is chasing pussy. If that doesn’t make you as pitiful as the easy women you sleep with, I don’t know what does.

‘What is the quality of mine offense,
Being constrain’d with dreadful circumstance?
May my pure mind with the foul act dispense,
My low-declined honor to advance?
May any terms acquit me from this chance?
The poison’d fountain clears itself again;
And why not I from this compelled stain?

With this, they all at once began to say,
Her body’s stain her mind untainted clears;
While with a joyless smile she turns away
The face, that map which deep impression bears
Of hard misfortune, carv’d in it with tears.
‘No, no,’ quoth she, ‘no dame, hereafter living,
By my excuse shall claim excuse’s giving.

Here with a sigh, as if her heart would break,
She throws forth Tarquin’s name: ‘He, he,’ she says,
But more than ‘he’ her poor tongue could not speak;
Till after many accents and delays,
Untimely breathings, sick and short assays,
She utters this: ‘He, he, fair lords, ’tis he,
That guides this hand to give this wound to me.’

Even here she sheathed in her harmless breast
A harmful knife, that thence her soul unsheath’d:
That blow did bail it from the deep unrest
Of that polluted prison where it breath’d:
Her contrite sighs unto the clouds bequeath’d
Her winged sprite, and through her wounds doth fly
Life’s lasting date from cancell’d destiny.

I think there was a story on Tucker Max’ website (well I think he’s kind of a fraud but it’s pertinent) where he had a girl suck his cock who then went on a day with some chump. That’s gotta hurt, kiss your date goodbye and you get in contact with second hand jizz.

You can argue that women have no agency, and therefore the indiscretion is almost entirely the man’s fault. The corollary of course carries implications with regards to suffrage and such.

Yes, yes.

But of course, YaReally’s error is always in the interpretation of his peculiar experiences into a philosophy-at-large about the human condition. He’s just an aggressive and shitty interpreter of his own limited experiences:

Guys who are still attached to the fantasy that they’re going to find the perfect Madonna and she’s going to be faithful and they’re going to get married and everyone else just sucks but HE’LL make it work…when they read my shit, hopefully it gives them pause and makes them reconsider volunteering to go to the slaughter.

Women are what fathers, brothers, and husbands allow them to be. If your entire experience is with imitating the outward signs of domination, rather than with domination per se, you will dismiss the possibility of male preeminence which survives, if covertly, even in this most anti-masculine culture and the wild claims of pseudoalphas fucking everybody’s wife.

Not incidentally, this lack of experience also reveals the poseur’s fundamental betatude — women and their hypergamy just are, they are an indomitable force of nature, there is nothing men can do about their sluttish ways except conform to the female will run amok. If you can’t beat them, join them.

Of course this is loser-talk and crypto-feminism twice removed, conveniently obscured under a mountain of braggadocio. The duller and more bitter among you will be fans of it. The secretly perverse will live vicariously through it, not able to detect the exaggeration.

If life on Earth turned out to be the result of alien activity, either deliberate or accidental, it simply suggests that life developed elsewhere first, and spread to Earth before anything life-like could develop here.

It’s actually kind of unlikely that all habitable worlds would develop their own life forms before alien visitors could find them. Even with slow interstellar travel, on the order of 1 percent of the speed of light, one civilization could spread its vehicles across the Galaxy in 10 million years. According to the best estimates of biologists, life emerged on Earth about 100 million years after conditions became suitable. So once one civilization starts sending out spaceships, that means all the lifebearing worlds are more likely to get seeded with alien life than to develop their own.

This also means that if life on Earth really did evolve here from scratch, then there were no advanced civilizations in the Galaxy over the last billion or so years.

Those who make bad, irrevocable decisions — or engage in behavior that leads to bad outcomes — often crave moral approval. It’s why gays will never be satisfied until someone reads a “historical” constitutional right to gay marriage into the constitution. Equalized rights were insufficient. The democratic process of several states was insufficient. Nay, they want to erase any and all traces of moral disapproval from the history books.

Tolerance is probably one of the great virtues that Western Civilization has spilled blood for. I take pride in our achievements — the Civil War, Civil Rights, Voting Rights. These are great moral victories. However, yesterday’s legal equals but social pariahs are now trying to take, by force of law, moral approval from the masses. Blacks, women, gays, and all other minorities deserve equal treatment — but, bad behavior is bad behavior. I will judge you on it. I will judge your culture on it. Deal with it. Moral judgment is a social freedom.

And so it is here, that the single mother wants more than tolerance. Society already has decided to tolerate the plight by giving welfare — it’s the equivalent of saying “yeah, you fucked up, but you were young — it happens.” But now, the single mother wants to erase the “you fucked up” part. Has our culture become so averse to accountability and shame?

Actually an increasing number of childless, single career women are footing the welfare bill as the pool of working tax paying men shrink. My single, childless (lesbian), and formerly leftist/feminist lawyer sister is always complaining about the extortionate taxes she has to pay, while getting nothing back in return – as if her politics did not contribute to the situation she is finding herself in.
I predict as the numbers of such women grow, feminisim will split into two camps – the single entitled welfare moms versus the never married, childless, single career woman.
Guys, just sit back and enjoy the show !

Middle class women will never vote to cut back on welfare, however much they complain about welfare women. The ONE thing they do NOT want is a bunch of welfare women with no choice but to secure a man to support them, restricting the supply of Beta providers.

You might say that middle-class men would not take an underclass girlfriend. What will happen is that underclass women would go after working class men, and working-class women, facing a lack of supply, would energetically go after middle-class men.

The middle class women I know are in favor of making welfare recepients responsible or cutting benefits. They want a mandatory work requirement. Some are in favor of mandatory birth control or sterilization.
This is especially true for married women, even more true for stay at home moms.

Weren’t the divorce laws in Massachusetts changed recently to be less onerous to men regarding alimony? As I recall, the law was changed due to political pressure from the many second wives of divorced men, who thought it so unfair that their husbands were paying so much alimony to their first wives. This wasn’t due to the realization of the unfairness of the law. The second wives just wanted a bigger cut for themselves.

The lawmakers agreed to the more equitable asset sharing plan.

Guys. Get married? Get fucked. And not in the way you are thinking.

Staying single will not protect you entirely from giving assets to women involuntarily, but it will limit the damage.

“Feminism is the result of ugly jewish women that no men want to penetrate.”

True, but much more than that.

It is all part of the Culture of Critique (as described by Prof. Kevin MacDonald). It is a deliberate, guided attack, designed to corrupt, degrade and destroy Western society. One of several attacks, all coordinated under the umbrella of Cultural Marxism.

“Feminism is the result of ugly jewish women that no men want to penetrate.”

Very true. But much more as well. Feminism is one part of a deliberate, targeted attack on Western society. One of several ongoing attacks, all coordinated under Cultural Marxism, and designed to degrade and destroy Western culture.

If there was an anti-feminist videogame, the German femcunt Alice Schwarzer might be the last boss you fight. Google her, but keep a barf bag ready, even if you are used to ugly people telling pretty lies.

Yes, accused by jealous creeps like you. Again, most music starts are not Jewish. They are either Black, or white trash, like you. Do Brittany Spears and Justin Bieber come to mind? Two nice Germans that have sold smut and corrupted the youth. Are your kids listening to that?

LOL! Actually, I like both of these artists. But that Hitler worshipper Greg keeps saying the Jews in Hollywood or the music business are corrupting society, Blah, Blah, Blah….while most artists in entertainment are not Jews, yet all he does is trash the Jews. Hence, it’s obvious that he has no rational or objective perspective here. Someone has to state the truth, or he’ll take liberties with it and lead us all astray. So I wonder if these two German artist are playing in his house, never mind their supposed corrupting.

Maybe to some the truth is not important (one mark of the beast of the Left), but to me it is. The Nazi can claim the Jews are dominating the world, but it only makes him look like a loser creep who is jealous of more successful people than himself. If he is indeed jealous of the Jews, he should copy their success, not be resentful of it. And he is teaching his sons this same hatred, no doubt, which will turn them into the same losers he is. Sigh……the cycle of such families never ends.

Arabs are also “Semites”, but I’m sure you have no problem with bashing them.

You might want to ask yourself why J3ws felt the need to create a special, obfuscating term for “racism” (religion-ism? Which are they? Well, which way is the wind blowing today?) against them in order to give themselves an exalted victim status.

Protip: so that people like you would mindlessly knee-jerk every time any criticism is leveled at them.

True, Arabs are Semites too, but anti-Semitism has traditionally referred to Jews. Now Arabs are attempting to hijack that term with this false argument.

Same thing with the term Palestinian. It originally referred to Jews, not Arabs. Arabs hijacked the name after 1963. All of a sudden we have the nation of Palestinian, which never existed in history before. Ingenious these Arabs aren’t they? One of the many ways they wage jihad on the non-believer is they confuse him with false arguments so that he can’t see straight and falls for their tricks.

Regarding trashing them, what I say about them is a historical fact. Try refuting it. They don’t have your best interest at heart. What they do want is to spread their religion to all corners of the globe, until no religion is left but theirs. The fact you are worried about their interests is very perplexing. You should be worried about the interest of America and other democracies, not theirs. They want to bring down all of our cultures. Wise up!

Ridiculous theories then, is it? I am doing something I rarely do in public forums but you are too fucking retarded not to do this. I’m NAMING the JEW. Betty Freidam and Gloria Steinem, are the Adam? and Eve of it all, then let us name more jews; Shulman, Barbara Seaman, Phyllis Chelser, Sally Priesand, Debby Frieman, Rachel Adler, Susan Brownmiller (jew), Meredith Tax, Deena Metzger, Susannah Herschel, Herle Feld. That is the SHORT list from circa ’65 to 1985, things have ahh, how do I say? Accelerated since 30 years ago. Let me tell you one thing for certain you may or may not know. When the shit goes down, and it will go down sooner or later; YOU and by you I mean Heebs, will be 2nd against the wall. First your pet Africans as they are more feral and dangerous than you even though you empower them, but secondly, you wish to destroy Europeans and the nuclear family. You’ve done an amazing job of it, but in spite of 4 decades of inculcation of our youth, we are waking up. You will go against the wall with your pet monkeys because you are mainly manipulative cowards.

Greg ffs, do you not understand that Jews in the US are plainly just more liberal than than the average liberal? Why do you think half marry outside their faith(and many times race), why do think their population is shrinking=

My point is that Jews wield an undue influence, and not for the better, over the government of the US and especially the media (that most powerful weapon of all), for several decades now.

And the commensurate cultural decline and national suicide can be laid, in large part, on their doorstep… regardless if many gentiles are at fault as their puppets as well… because we’re allowed to deal with the latter, but holding the former to account is streng verboten.

And a few neat Broadway musicals or a cure for polio mean little when your people are eventually corrupted into oblivion, if not outright destroyed.

@Greg: I’ll spare you the nuance: it’s not a conspiracy because no such conspiracy exists. Further, your nebulous phrase “the nature of the being” obfuscates entirely the fact that Jews don’t have a single mind, and aren’t corrupting anything that WASPs haven’t already corrupted on their own. After all, if it is not the reason then it is not the cause, and thus the result cannot be drawn to it.

Btw I’m white protestant…but we must not forget that it is rational, impartial analysis that yields correct perspective, nothing more.

fauvist, I don’t know how many times I have to say the same thing over again to get past your “conspiracy” dodge in making those who name the Jew seem paranoid, but here it is for the last time:

Nobody believes that all Jews are in cahoots on any global plan, per se… and thank you, Captain Obvious.

The point is, there are all-too-many people in positions of deleterious influence in government and media (and many behind the scenes whose names aren’t readily known unless one does some digging) that just “happen to be Jewish”.

So whether they are acting in concert or independently does not matter… the result is corruption and ultimate destruction of a given host nation.

And therefore, a healthy folk’s guard must be kept up… both for their own sake AND, ironically enough, for the sake of the “good Jews”.

Now knock off the apologetics and stop being a “useful idiot” for those who are working to undermine this nation… indeed, the entire West.

Greg is a Nazi, a Hitler worshipper, who always says the same thing regarding the Jews wielding undue influence. He accused me of being Jewish too when I did battle with him. I’m like you, a protestant who doesn’t hate the Jews. The problem we have in this country is Liberals, and not just in this country but all over the West, even in countries that don’t have Jews. As Anonymous aptly says, most of the Jews are Jews in name only. They don’t even practice their faith and end up marrying non-Jews. On the other hand, if they did practice Judaism, they wouldn’t be Liberal. In fact, most practicing/religious/orthodox Jews are conservative politically, as Judaism is the least Liberal of religions, and everything the Left teaches is the very antithesis of Judaism. Anyone who read up just a little about orthodox or classic Judaism would know that.

Ant-Semites like Greg look for a scapegoat because they so hates the “prosperous” Jew. Wasn’t he the one who said that he came from a poor family? I am sure watching the Jews get education and make money was too much for him and his folks to take, so they taught him to hate the Jew instated of copying his success – like going to school, getting an education in something with potential, and getting a high-powered job. He sounds exactly like those poor delusional Blacks that think White people made it on their backs, when in reality staying in the ghettoes and selling drugs will never get you anywhere. Blacks’ jealousy of White people for their success, and Whites like Greg hating Jews for their success, are just 2 sides of the same coin once again. Both are as dumb as a door knob. They share the same stupid losing arguments that will only bring them more unhappiness, resentment, and frustration. I wonder what he teaches his sons. If he teaches them anti-Semitism they will stay just as lowly as he is.

“Ugly gentile women are plenty busy screwing up their own societies, which leads me to believe that it’s not the result of some Jewish conspiracy or whatever.”

Very true. Feminists are gentiles too, not just Jewish. Feminists are part of the Left and the Left come in all shapes and sizes. Given that Jews are under 1% of the population, most of the Left in this country are not Jewish.

“In the current issue of America’s most influential international relations magazine Foreign Affairs, Dr Megan MacKenzie from the Department of Government and International Relations argues that the US military should lift their outdated ban on women serving in front-line combat.”

Bottom line, feminists in all shapes and sizes, securing up all societies, in all countries.

The people complaining ONLY about the Jews are ONLY interested in exaggerating their influence because their jealousy and hatred are blinding them. They think the Jews have all the money, the good careers, and the good jobs. So instead of fighting the Left effectively, they try to turn it all against the Jews and screw us up even more.

The anger should be directed at the Left, not Jews. If one is only naming the Jew than he has no credibility. Such a person is not really interested in bringing down Leftism, all he wants is to lash out at the Jew because he’s resentful of his success.

I wonder if these people are not themselves Leftists trying to thwart our efforts of fighting the Left by redirecting people’s focus on the Jews. I mean, every civilization needs a scapegoat, who’s better than the Jew?

Furthermore, these awful Jewish women destroyed true Judaism (orthodox Judaism) with that fucking liberal bullshit, called Reformed Judaism, which is nothing but a religion where all liberal issues have been rolled into it, and they also emasculated all the Jewish men. I’m surprised Heartiste is Jewish and he talks like a real man. That’s got to be an anomaly, if there ever was one.

And here’s the Harpy Bizarre again, to bloviate her outhouse psychology and neocon claptrap… along with the I-FOUND-A-GENTILE! gambit, instead of addressing said “undue influence” of the big names found in the ranks from the “mere” 1% to 3%… the list of which has been printed in this very forum many times over the past few months.

“My point is that Jews wield an undue influence, and not for the better, over the government of the US and especially the media (that most powerful weapon of all), for several decades now. ”
Again, they are liberals and promote liberalism, just as gentile liberals do.

“And the commensurate cultural decline and national suicide can be laid, in large part, on their doorstep… regardless if many gentiles are at fault as their puppets as well… because we’re allowed to deal with the latter, but holding the former to account is streng verboten.”
I see your point, but saying that Jews at large are the enemy is almost meaningless when they are only 2% of the US population. Think about the hordes of liberal youth who vote for liberal policies, policies they themselves created.

Even though it might be hard to come to terms with, Whites and Jews are both predisposed to liberalism. Why else would all White nations be corrupted with it and feminism(the liberals eternal ally)?

“And a few neat Broadway musicals or a cure for polio mean little when your people are eventually corrupted into oblivion, if not outright destroyed.”
The Jews have done much more, though they owe a large part of that to the welcoming nature of White nations. And again, the corruption is in our blood, and has to be tamed for us to survive.

Elliot wriggles around on hope while Jesus explicitly and implicitly rejected racism several times: “There are no Greeks, no Jews.”

Look for whatever inferiority feelings you have that keep you judging someone just because their parents were Jewish. How the hell can that a priori make someone guilty of something? It’s insane as well as poorly thought out.

Elliot wriggles around on hope while Jesus explicitly and implicitly rejected racism several times: “There are no Greeks, no Jews.”

Rev: 3:9

Matt: 27: 24-25

John 8:44

et. al.

Don’t presume to tell me what Scripture says, fool… especially as an unbeliever… when you selectively quote Galatians 3:28, and misrepresent its meaning (the kingdom of heaven is not the current earth, and the brother/sisterhood of believers is where the equality exists, not amongst the enemies of both Man and God)… you’re just the usual liar of your ilk, as the verses I give you above call you out.

Look for whatever inferiority feelings you have that keep you judging someone just because their parents were Jewish. How the hell can that a priori make someone guilty of something? It’s insane as well as poorly thought out.

I judge based upon what they themselves do, based upon the actions which carry their names, whether on legislation, news article, or screen credit.

You idiots keep skirting the issue of the machers who control our media and government that are Jews, and well out of proportion to their numbers in the general population.

There are obviously guilty gentiles as well in these positions, and they will get their accounts settled as well… but they are, for the most part, jumping to the tune of their Jewish masters.

Jesus gave strong warnings and rebukes to the machers of His day, the Pharisees and Sanhedrin.

Merely because they were richer and more respected than Jesus did not make Him inferior.

The “regular folk”… those trying to get along in the world, plying their honest trades and taking care of their own families and clans without disrupting others were not targets of His wrath… neither are the regular folk of today who are doing the same targets of mine, be they Jew or Gentile.

And the men nowadays who call out the feminists, leftists, and other culture corrupters and nation destroyers are not “just jealous” or inferior.

“And the men nowadays who call out the feminists, leftists, and other culture corrupters and nation destroyers are not “just jealous” or inferior.”

Oh, no, you don’t. Don’t try to twist what you previously said, Mr. Prevaricator. Calling out the feminists, the Leftists, and other culture corrupters, are not who we’re protecting from being maligned, as they rightly deserve it. But you’re indicting a whole religion, a whole people, because of your resentment, frustration and Jealousy. 30% of Jews are not Liberal; they vote conservative. I read the breakdown of whom voted for whom, and 31% of Jews voted for Romney.

If you were an honest man and really wanted to destroy the feminists, leftists, and other culture corrupters for their bad influences on America, you wouldn’t be constantly trashing the Jews without rhyme nor reason. It’s obvious you have a very strong hate for them that you cannot see straight. Therefore, you have no rational or objective perspective. You’re full of shit. You can’t be trusted, and you’re dangerous. It seems the war of the Germans against the Jews is still going on right here and you’re encouraging it, like Obamas encourages Black racism and race bating. Your hate for the Jews isn’t going to help us get rid of the Left. The Jews are under 1% of the population, thus most of the Left in this country is not Jewish. Your approach is going to destroy our cause. Your hero Hitler already tried this route, how did it go for him?

NiteLily, you’re just a silly little shrew looking for a man to tame her… a half-baked neocon that allows railing against the diseases of the body politic, but when anyone actually mentions germs you fall into apoplectic inanities.

Notice how The Girl With The Dragon Mouth selectively ignores, in re salient points in the very posts to which she attempts to respond, what doesn’t suit her “NAH-ZEE!!!” obsessions:

The “regular folk”… those trying to get along in the world, plying their honest trades and taking care of their own families and clans without disrupting others were not targets of His wrath… neither are the regular folk of today who are doing the same targets of mine, be they Jew or Gentile.

But you’re indicting a whole religion, a whole people, because of your resentment, frustration and Jealousy. 30% of Jews are not Liberal; they vote conservative. I read the breakdown of whom voted for whom, and 31% of Jews voted for Romney.

Heh, heh… The Girl With The Dragon Mouth doesn’t even realize she’s making my argument for me.

So, dearie, if 70% of a given people support the views you yourself treat as anathema, we should overlook their control and ownership of a nation’s mainstream media (that most powerful of weapons) and undue influence in government?

Would it assuage your tender sensibilities if I merely addressed specific names instead of saying “Jews”? I mean, I will gladly, but it’s just that Jesus didn’t find it necessary to give us any specific names of the Pharisees or Sanhedrin… He took his warnings and rebukes to be understood that they didn’t apply to the kosher butcher down the street who’s just trying to make a living.

Think of it this way: you could live in Camden or Oakland and find that many, many negroes are quite law-abiding, even friendly.

Does that mean you will move and send your children to school there?

Or wish for your current neighborhood to change to, say, 50% negro population as soon as possible?

“Heh, heh… The Girl With The Dragon Mouth doesn’t even realize she’s making my argument for me.”

No amount of calling me names is going to change the truth about you. You are a neo-Nazi fact, and that’s why you have no rational or objective perspective. And I am not making your argument for you, nice trying to twist the truth. If anything, by what you wrote I can show the lying irrational creep you are, and you are proving me right.

“if 70% of a given people support the views you yourself treat as anathema, we should overlook their control and ownership of a nation’s mainstream media (that most powerful of weapons) and undue influence in government?”

Really, and you call this logic??? LMAO!!!!!

If 70% of these people are liberal, does it mean they are ALL working in the media and the government, every single one of them? And you call this being logical? Or maybe we should call this being jealous and anti-Semitic beyond any rational amounts that you can’t see straight and your jealousy and hate have no bounds and you start to make some fantastic crazy wired claims.

You have an irrational hate of the Jews, now, that isn’t rocket science.

If 70% of these people are liberal, does it mean they are ALL working in the media and the government, every single one of them?

Geez, either gather your wits about you and keep your attention span long enough to actually comprehend the posts you are trying to gainsay, or just STFU.

I’ve said in several posts and several alternative ways now that neither Jesus or myself mean “every Jew”.

I repeat again, and for the last time, what exactly about the following words did you NOT comprehend?

The “regular folk”… those trying to get along in the world, plying their honest trades and taking care of their own families and clans without disrupting others were not targets of His wrath… neither are the regular folk of today who are doing the same targets of mine, be they Jew or Gentile.

“Go look at the links CH posted in his article.
The two feminists from the GLPiggy link: Madeleine Schwartz and Karen Kornbluh
The two feminists from the Reason link: Nancy Polikoff and Katha Pollitt
It’s quite a coincidence that every single one of these promoters of single momhood just so happen to be Jews.”

So in your little can’t-chew-gum-and-walk-at-the-same-time brain, that mean all feminists are Jews? So there are no feminists anywhere in any country only the USA, right? Stupid.

There are feminists and liberals all over the continent of Europe, idiot. And over there not many Jews are NOT around. Therefore, feminists come in all shapes and sizes, and most of them in the USA are not Jewish as Jews are 1% of the population. Talk about being blind to reality. No wonder you can’t find a woman.

Here is a link to a non-Jewish feminist screaming about letting women fight in combat. Now what does your cunt brain says about that?

“In the current issue of America’s most influential international relations magazine Foreign Affairs, Dr Megan MacKenzie from the Department of Government and International Relations argues that the US military should lift their outdated ban on women serving in front-line combat.”

Bottom line, feminists in all shapes and sizes, are screwing up all societies, in all countries.

“The “regular folk”… those trying to get along in the world, plying their honest trades and taking care of their own families and clans without disrupting others were not targets of His wrath… neither are the regular folk of today who are doing the same targets of mine, be they Jew or Gentile.”

My lying Nazi, and when I said once not all the Jews are bad (just the liberals) you replied to me “but trouble is by time you find out it might be too late. “ Meaning you don’t make distinctions and you couldn’t give a shit who is bad or not. You lump them all togther.

So please stop trying to backpedal. If you could, you’d kill everyone who wasn’t Aryan, and you’d still sleep well at night.

I bet you have the swastika flag hanging in your house, and a picture of Hitler, Mr. Murder, hanging over you bed.

Nazi propaganda is not what’s going to helps rid ourselves of the Left. If God wanted Hitler to be successful he would have won. The fact that he didn’t, speaks volumes. Chew on that for a while.

Stupid, indeed. Please shut your cockhole until you can understand what Greg and I are actually saying. I know your little pea-brain has trouble understanding, but there is a difference between observing general tendencies and making statements about absolutes.

My lying Nazi, and when I said once not all the Jews are bad (just the liberals) you replied to me “but trouble is by time you find out it might be too late. “ Meaning you don’t make distinctions and you couldn’t give a shit who is bad or not. You lump them all togther.

Silly twit, that’s a well-worn line that is often used when internet forum “discussions” invariably turn to the stupid NAxALT apologetics, be it Jews, women, negroes, rednecks, (put your favorite bete noir here as x).

You yourself have said sweeping statements about Muslims, Germans, etc., so don’t YOU try to backpedal and project your inanities upon me.

So please stop trying to backpedal. If you could, you’d kill everyone who wasn’t Aryan, and you’d still sleep well at night.

Again, that’s your projection for all the Muslims and “Germans who got what they deserved”, including the women and children. When I talk about “undue and deleterious influence”, YOU project that into killing, fool.

@Laconophile
You’re too stupid to have a meaningful discussion if you think the Jews are controlling the world. Just sit down and shut the fuck up. I can’t talk to ignoramus French boys. Oh.….and I am not a Jewess.

I don’t have a hatred of the Jew. I am not a poor white; I come from a wealthy well-to-do family. My parents have money and made money, lots of it, sometimes with Jews too. We weren’t taught to hate the Jew. The Jew didn’t take away our jobs or our livelihood.

My entire family is conservative (with a few minor exception) so we all don’t like the liberals, but never in a million years did we blame the Jews for the problems of liberalism. Liberals come in all shapes and sizes. Most of them are not Jewish. Liberalism has taken hold all over the world, in many places where there are no Jews, thus it’s not a Jewish issue. The Jews are 1% of the population in the USA, and around 00001% of the population worldwide. They are not controlling anything, period. We need to wake up and help ourselves instead of trashing and getting mad at Jews. We can help ourselves by weakening the Left. If we direct all our anger at the Jews, we are just as much losers as other lowly races that have no inclination or clue on how to help themselves and all they do is have jealousy of Whites. There are many other better answers than ones that look like they were taken directly from the middle-ages Inquisition or Nazi propaganda.

“Silly twit, that’s a well-worn line that is often used when internet forum “discussions” invariably turn to the stupid NAxALT apologetics, be it Jews, women, negroes, rednecks, (put your favorite bete noir here as x).”

Oh so you have been told off before, eh? LOL! Ummmm…..you’re a long-time die-hard Nazi.

“You yourself have said sweeping statements about Muslims, Germans, etc., so don’t YOU try to backpedal and project your inanities upon me.”

Don’t you even dare twist it around, liar. I never preach killing. I said the Muslims are dangerous because they are waging war all over the world, and they need to be stopped. Therefore, if they attack us again they should get the full brunt of our strength, a message they will not soon forget. That’s the only way to save American lives, or is saving American lives not important in your eye? Regarding the Nazi’s, they were evil and they too needed to be stopped, what’s the problem? Unless of course, you commiserate with those killers??? I’m not a moral relativist. There is right and there is wrong, and the Germans were wrong. Yeah, I think the Jews are righteous compared to Muslims and Nazis, how’s that for your little reptile brain to take?

“Again, that’s your projection for all the Muslims and “Germans who got what they deserved”, including the women and children.”

I said it in respect to the German women getting raped by the Russians. Sorry, I stand by that statement. The Germans started the war, thus they deserve what comes. You can’t get away with killing 60-70 million people and expect to get away with it without a price. That was the price, as everything has a price. God doesn’t play favorites. You become evil, you pay. They got exactly what they deserved. Yet, it was nothing like the atrocities the Germans committed against innocent men, women, and children – burying them alive, shooting, burning, gassing them to death. There is no comparison. Now you too fuck off with Laconophile.

LOL! The fauvist comment is like the comment that lunched a 1000 replies, idiotic as they are, by Neo Nazis and their sympathizers. Disgusting!

96% of political donations from Ivy League faculty & staff went for Obama
Oliver Darcy

By Oliver Darcy, on Nov 27, 2012

96% of the faculty and staff at Ivy League colleges that contributed to the 2012 presidential race donated to President Obama’s campaign, reveals a Campus Reform investigation compiled using numbers released by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

I wrote: “Silly twit, that’s a well-worn line that is often used when internet forum “discussions” invariably turn to the stupid NAxALT apologetics, be it Jews, women, negroes, rednecks, (put your favorite bete noir here as x).”

GWTDM replied: “Oh so you have been told off before, eh? LOL! Ummmm…..you’re a long-time die-hard Nazi.

Could you be more dense? The well-worn line I was talking about was my original “By the time you find out which is which, it could be too late”, in re the usual NAxALT.

You know, it’s gotten to the point where you really should just collect your 30 shekels from your puppet masters and get congratulated by your shabbos goy fellow travelers as being the most aggravating useful idiot to weary the chateau with your incredible insipidness.

@Canadian Friend
Why are we not surprised that most of these evil professors are radical leftists? Do we still have any doubts that kids graduating from universities have their professors’ world view?

I had two professors in school that were somewhere right of center. Everyone else was radically to the left. It was very frustrating.

This confirms my theory that any time education is controlled by the Left, the culture is going to be leftists. It’s as plain as the sun rising in the east, but I guess not to conservatives, because they gave the Left the keys to the house and now they are not letting any conservatives in. They messed up big time. It’s going to be very hard to reverse things, if at all possible.

Then age-of-consent went up, so that employed twenty-something guys tended to avoid girls who could make them wind up in jail, leaving them to guys their own age, or to gang-banger thugs, neither of whom is likely to support a wife.

Here we pretty much read that married couples with two incomes have it better than a woman who gets knocked up by I think 3 different men (guess what race). And that’s privilege. I would say, the privilege of better choices, but I’m not allowed to judge, I just foot the bill.

Yeah, it’s mainly because they think history started 1950 (nevermind the loons on the right with their 6000 year old planet), and somehow white men just were quickest to run into all the great companies and institutions that were already there. Then on the other hand the generation of men who had nothing to do with the actual and perceived grievances should take the responsibilities for whatever happened before they were born.

What an idiot. I’ve done my time taking care of my kids alone, and it sucks. Nobody’s around to give you a break, you don’t get a moment’s rest, and you just don’t have as much to offer the kids. Say I want to take my son biking, but my daughter has a cold. Scratch the biking, we’ve all got to stay home. What if my daughter wants to go to a movie my son would hate? No movie for her. How about I want to shop for groceries without kids slowing me down pulling my sleeves to get me to buy them stuff. Can’t do it.

Two parents solve so many of these little problems I can’t even count them. Single mothers by choice are irresponsible, selfish and stupid. All the guys I grew up with who ended up in jail had one. If you really want to screw your kids over, become a single mom.

I wonder why society tolerates – no, encourages – them to the extent we do. They are the engines of the underclass, incubators of crime, and the giant, swirling vortex into which our national wealth is disappearing.

Why society tolerates it? I find it irrelevant. Simply get rid of the free government goodies at tax payers expense and this single mother epidemic wont be able to continue whether society condones it or not. I have nothing against the few single mothers who would be able to support their child with their own money. Is that an ideal environment for a child to grow up? Absolutely not, but I dont care what other people do with their children. Time to quit shielding people from the consequences of their actions.

It wouldn’t be able to continue, but what do you do with the single mothers and there children that are already there? Let the children starve? I doubt you’ll find a lot of people who’d agree with that.

I just thought it might not be a bad idea to offer free birth control (not the $3000 Sandra Fluke kind), maybe some kind of depot shot because many might be too stupid to take them. Maybe actually pay them if they use it. Lure them in with an Obama Phone 😉

So true. People don’t realize that most of them could just marry some Herb that would be happy to have her. But that would mean she would have to stop banging thugs. Women despise the idea that a regular working beta might get something for his money and support. They would rather have it extorted from him – consent means little to them.

Why cant the people who dont agree with the children starving donate to a charity instead of being forced through taxes to pay? No child is entitled to having food in their stomach. That is the parent’s responsibility plain and simple. I also dont see why we need to give these people free birth control either. Why cant they buy their own or not have sex? If they have a child anyway, than they can go to charities or have their relatives help.

The human race has survived up to this point just fine without having to steal from tax payers to prop up single mothers. I suppose it’s pointless in the end anyway, eventually there wont be any money to give away to help these people anyway.

The moment they stop holding men responsible for kids born out of wedlock, and the feminist child-support police couldn’t make men pay up, none of these women would be getting pregnant without the benefit of marriage. Also, stop all government help like EBT card, and that will ensure only families that can afford to have kids will have them. Everything is so screwed up. The liberals encourage perverseness and degeneracy.

That dangerous for several reasons. It not only (as newyorker said) reduces birth to the prudent, it reduces demand and the ability to pay for security and infrastructure.

The last thing we need is a low smart people birth rate and a mob of hungry angry dumb people.

Now assuming you could get the birth rates of the poor down, say by paying them this would end up lowering all birth rates. This would collide massively with churches, the military (less so these days) and business alike both of whom need new people either to recruit or to sell too.

fact is we don’t have any real means to voluntarily move to a much lower production and consumption society. We may be forced to it but we can’t get off the treadmill and keep the lights on.

the fact is we don’t need a high smart people birth rate either. the number of jobs suitable for the educated middle class is diminishing as well. the job-seeker must be connected or extraordinary to get anywhere. i see it in my kids’ job prospects, one of them is back in school, another joining the navy. it is not their fathers’ job market, to be sure.

i read of some one percenter claiming american workers must accept 20% lower salaries in order for jobs to return here. and then what would he think would happen? the economy would collapse. and who’d fund the upbringing of the next generation under such conditions? i understand back in the day people had no choice but to accept children. not the case now. the one percenter’s prescription would be tantamount to a demographic death spiral.

@ newyorker
“the fact is we don’t need a high smart people birth rate either.”
Spoken like a true shortsighted liberal, who is so selfish he only thinks of himself. Kinda like most of Obama’s voters. They voted for him because he promised goodies, never mind if he’s not good for the country. He’s good for me, right?

On the contrary, we do need more smart people so that humanity evolve and reach the heights in science, industry, and the arts. We don’t need to stop having kids so that your progeny has job security.

“i read of some one percenter claiming american workers must accept 20% lower salaries in order for jobs to return here.”

American workers are finicky. One can’t have his cake and eat it too. One thing always goes at the expense of another. It’s the first rule of growing up.
If American workers agree to get rid of the unions, extravagant pensions, and forgo health insurance, then corporations can afford American workers. Until then, it makes better sense to manufacture or run a company in the 3rd world, where stupid liberal rules haven’t taken hold.

Whether you like it or not, it’s just about business survival. Not some conspiracy.

‘On the contrary, we do need more smart people so that humanity evolve and reach the heights in science, industry, and the arts./’

why? what’s in it for the little guy? ask our host. you’ll find him poolside.

‘American workers are finicky. One can’t have his cake and eat it too.’

why not? the one percenters do.

‘If American workers agree to get rid of the unions, extravagant pensions, and forgo health insurance, then corporations can afford American workers.’

american workers will perhaps be forced to accept this for themselves. but nobody should be surprised if they refuse to raise up children under such conditions. think about it. would _you_ say, happily impose a possible early death on your child if he got sick and you couldn’t afford treatment due to lack of insurance? not me. i’d say, fuck that shit.

‘Until then, it makes better sense to manufacture or run a company in the 3rd world, where stupid liberal rules haven’t taken hold.’

yep! that works until it doesn’t. until the immiseration-and diminishing buying power- of the american middle class is complete.

Don’t get me wrong. I don’t want our jobs going elsewhere, but the entitlement mentality is not only directed at the government. It’s also directed at business. Workers milk a business to death either via regulations and legislation like affirmative action, out-of-control sexual harassment lawsuits, and workers comp, etc. or via policy and norms that have been accepted in the business world like unions, health insurance, and large pensions. It’s weighting down business in its wake. Surly, you see that it’s impossible to conduct a profitable business under such conditions. Try starting a business today and see how the regulations kill you before you even opened your doors. It’s only going to get worse. Every business is going to move to Asia in the next 10 years and then what? It’s a vicious cycle because the US population, who won’t have work, will not be able to afford all the goods business dump in the US. The population doesn’t have money to spend so business can’t sell goods and services.

So you see, every aspect is dependent on another. We need a restructuring of our business model, and maybe now it’s the time to do it because many people don’t have jobs and might agree to take ones without so many benefits. First and foremost, it means getting rid of the unions and making health insurance only in case of emergencies (very large deductible), like your child getting a bad disease, as you mentioned. The rest of the time, you should be able to pay out of pocket. Next, many of the regulations need to be relaxed, especially the ones that don’t protect the public and only give it a false sense of security. When that happens, see corporations returning here. Notice, I didn’t mention cutting taxes on corporations, that’s because I don’t think it makes much difference or takes its toll like the union, the regulations, and the benefits, although I don’t think we should increase taxes on them either.

When such changes take hold, the Jobs will return here,. Otherwise we’re headed to a decline that will eventually destroy the country. Every empire falls apart, usually from within – by its own people – just like cancer cells from within destroy the body. It’s a real shame, but if people are not willing to make painful measures, they deserve what is coming to them. We just can’t think emotionally about this, we need to think more logically, as painful as it is.

probably, if you’re willing to see a whole lot more beggars on the street.

otoh, what else would gutting the safety net do? it would likely reduce the prudent middle class’ fertility. many are already living paycheck to paycheck in this world of wage stagnation and job insecurity. who would impose such conditions on one’s progeny? better not to take a chance of being reduced to indigence esp. if there may be little ones impacted.

besides, for all the noise made by conservatives, i doubt it would ever happen. the powers that be need their cannon fodder.

“probably, if you’re willing to see a whole lot more beggars on the street.”

It’s called tough love on our part, and being responsible on the sluts’ part. So because we don’t want to see beggars on the streets, we should let the sluts and their spawn hold us all hostages forever? Tough!. After a couple of years of this, no one else would be having babies outside of marriage, end of subject.

The sluts will learn to be responsible for their actions and realize their choices have consequences. It’s the only way you teach bitches and leftists morality. It’s painful but it works eventually. I am tired of this kid gloves treatment.

well, let’s not kid ourselves about what’s required. a good deal of heartlessness that may diminish one’s humanity, but that may be the necessary trade-off. one must ask oneself if it’s worth it.

my prescription would be that abortion (free!!) be very much encouraged in the unwed and pregnant. the alternative would no longer be becoming a ward of the state but imposing on your family, in which case your family would more or less force it. respect for life and motherhood would take a hit for sure, but it may be worth it. i suggest a ten year experiment to see.

Exactly, people who say that kind of nonsense have essentially lost all connection with reality. It’s really on the same level as arguing the world is flat…everyone with a brain knows it’s false and yet so many bend over backwards to believe it. What we’re seeing is a truly incredible amount of willful ignorance on display.

To be fair, a lot of feminists imagine themselves helping those sweet teenage moms make rent in exchange being allowed to slurp their snatches. Of course their government salary comes from taxing productive men, but Prof. Hamster says that men aren’t needed since the government can just print the money.

GLPiggy has it all wrong. “Single motherhood” is now 40% of all births, and it’s the result of the welfare state. And 40+ years of it have left our country with a problem the lefties refuse to admit exists… The Marching Morons.

Leftist groups often make life much worse for the people they claim to advocate on behalf of. Examples include unions closing down building sites with a single violation, and, hence, depriving the workers of the money they would have made that week, homosexual activists in the 80s asking that bathhouses be kept open even though this made AIDS spread through the gay community like wildfire, and communist nations abolishing capitalism but leaving their beloved workers far worse off. Likewise, feminists advocate single motherhood even though it is worse for women. A married woman with a child has a relationship with her husband. A single mother, by contrast, is going to have real trouble getting a relationship, because men don’t tolerate children unless they’re their own. A single mother also has to contend with paedophiles trying to develop a relationship so they can fuck her children. Furthermore, by the time her children have left home and she can devote more time to establishing a relationship her lustre will have worn off.

Because they don’t think. If it feels good and looks good, then they think it’s a good idea. It’s all emotionally driven for them. No logic involved whatsoever. And all time-tested proven-to-work highly-scrutinized values are thrown out the window and called atavistic.

I have to agree with this, and I expect anyone who has some familiarity with the left will as well. For example, the belief in equality (arguably the foundation of their ideas) is precisely as you describe, it has no rational basis and so it must rely entirely on emotional imperative. It’s a callow naivete that’s harmless enough in isolation but incredibly virulent when applied in group-think.

You will find that there is a handful of us here who truly understand the Left. Personally, I can smell a lefty a mile away. And from reading a few of your comments, I am beginning to think you can too, which is always very refreshing.

The Left is plagued with pathological delusions. Therefore, the truth doesn’t matter to the Left. They’ll change it, misrepresent it, omit it, hide it, lie about it, refuse to accept it, pretend it doesn’t exist – take your pick – all in the interest of feeling good, or in the interest of furthering their agenda, which is also usually about feeling good and equality crap. That’s why there is no rational basis to it. It doesn’t work. It brings down everything, especially the quality of the society.

Society is not meant to create equality for everyone and remove the taking of risk and of responsibility. Humans are meant to be go getters, fighters, achievers, discoverers, inventers, creators, developers, decipherers, differentiators – all male qualities, which the Left frowns upon. They want people to become sheep – follow them and their screwed up ideologies, think only according to the approved leftist line of thinking they teach in schools and universities (they hate it if you think for yourself), re-write history and throw away all time-tested values (or they’ll call you a throwback), have the government alleviate risk (whether it is in making bad choices like pregnancy without a marriage or buying a home you couldn’t afford), pay most of their income to the government so it can distribute it according to its whims (social engineering and meddling in the development of humanity with social and economic justice nonsense) – which makes humans less intelligent and makes them go backwards not progress. The irony is, their progressive ideas are really throwback ideas. They don’t help humanity progress at all. So who are the true atavists, if not the Left? But they can’t see the truth of who they are.

Another thing. Unlike some here who call themselves Conservatives or Libertarian, you’re really interested in bringing down the Left, not just simply lashing out at the Jews and minorities. There is a big difference there. The Nazi/racist/bigots are never going to help us rid ourselves of the Left. Instead, they will bring disaster upon us. All they want is to take out their resentment, aggression, and frustration, on Jews because they think they are dominating all the industries and controlling all the money. Jews are under 1% of the population, therefore, how are they going to dominate anything? The country is dominated by liberals, and given that Jews are under 1% of the population, most of the liberals in this country are not Jewish.

The anger should be directed at liberals, not Jews. If they are only calling out the Jews than they have no credibility. They are not really interested in bringing down liberalism, all they want is to lash out at the Jew because they’re resentful of his success.

The Nazi’s were leftists. They called themselves the National Socialists for a reason. They meant both words. The Brown Shirts were called Beefsteak Nazi’s by their contemporaries, brown on the outside but red on the inside. They earned their “right wing” label because they were nationalists, and not internationalists like the Jewish inspired Communist party, which took over Russia but failed to take over Western Europe.

It’s an interesting concept about Blacks and Jews being naturally liberal, as opposed to Whites. Actually, I want to adjust this a bit. I think most races that don’t have monotheism as the basis of their culture, will be liberal. That includes Blacks, Indians, Hindus, various Asians, etc. and indeed most of them vote Democrat. In fact, even highly intelligent Asians who don’t need government goodies voted for Obama. However, Christian, Jews and Muslims are not really liberal in their veins. But here is the thing. Each one of these groups has become corrupted by outside forces that turned it into part of the Democrats base.

Let’s take the Jews first. Ashkenazi Jews came from European countries where communism and socialism are the government since the turn of the 20th century. Their children and grandchildren born in the USA, still think with a socialist brain.

Yet Judaism is as far away from liberal ideals as possible, and everything the Left teaches is the very antithesis of Judaism. The problem is that most of these Jews are Jews in name only. They don’t practice their faith and even end up marrying non-Jews. On the other hand, if they did practice Judaism, they wouldn’t be Liberal. In fact, most practicing/religious/orthodox Jews are conservative politically. That’s about 30% of Jews that don’t vote for the Democrats. Additionally, most Jews from Eastern countries, called Sephardi Jews, are not Democrats politically. You can best see this line of demarcation in Israel. The conservative Jews are the religious and Sephardi, and the liberal Jews are the secular Ashkenazi. So I wouldn’t say liberalism is in the veins of the Jews, just in the veins of the non-observant Ashkenazi Jews. And indeed, even some of them abandon liberalism when they see the light.

Next, we have the Muslims. Thank goodness their number is still small, but they do dominate states like NJ and MI. They too are against many of the leftists issues, like homosexuality and various women issues, yet they too vote Democrat because they perceive the Democrats would be better against Israel and more open to letting Muslims immigrate to the US. Also, they can’t resist the goodies a Democrat government offers – food stamps for their many wives and kids. Canada is already letting Muslim men claim benefits for all their wives. Unfortunately, the Democrats will do the same in the US too.

What differentiates the Muslims from the secular Jews (who both vote Democrat), is that the Jews are not after getting goodies. They have no problems disbursing goodies by way of the government though, but they themselves don’t receive them. That’s how pathetic secular Jews are. Like many White Christians, they don’t know what’s really in their true interest and have bought into social justice crap.

This brings us to white Christians, still the majority thanks goodness, but their politics is not homogenous.

Many of the liberal ideas of the Left have seeped into the Christian churches since the 60s, especially in the Catholic community. Many Catholic Churches can be labeled liberal. They support gay marriage, immigration, gun control, entitlement programs, etc. They are also against capital punishment. Many of their members belong to unions, which only support Democrats. So most of their life is surrounded by liberal ideas and practices. Much of this demographic lives in swing states and they voted for Obama.

The same exact conditions exist with the Protestants, especially the Methodists and the Lutherans.

Thus, like Reform Judaism, many churches substituted Leftist social action for biblical theology. In that respect both the Jews and the Christians have been seduced by liberalism. There aren’t many difference among any of either the Christian or Jewish religious groups. All their theories and theologies have been influenced by social action, and they are in effect liberal activist institutions.

So who are the conservatives among white Christians? The Evangelical churches and the Mormon church. They are the Christian right. And even in the Evangelical churches, there is a group called the Evangelical left, where liberalism is creeping in.

So to say it’s all the Jews, or one group and not another, is quite ignorant. This problem encompasses much more than the Blacks or the Jews. The problem is liberalism and the way it manages to ingratiate itself into every aspect of American life. The country is racing left and it’s due to the stupidity of Conservatives who didn’t keep education under lock and key – closed to the Left. Now the country is a runaway train

“You’re so endearing with your targeting of libtards. You can include that hate in the curriculum at your charm school in West Virginia, that lovely Blue Subsidy state.”

What’s irking you sweat pea? I have a feeling you need to say something, but it just can’t come out right. That’s when you start venturing into areas like West Virginia and mumbling some incoherent stupidity. Well, out with it, let’s have it! Are you pissed I am not nice to Liberals?

She has become entirely too decrepit since 2008 to become president in 2016. Even then, you saw hints of elderly approach marks. She has been filmed through vaseline lenses and gauze for so long that the shock of her aging will viscerally turn voters off.

I’d say I’m surprised at the wide-spread denial about this issue, particularly in the media’s calls for her candidacy, but I no longer permit myself the luxury of surprise.

oh, i dunno. perhaps she’s not so much decrepit as post-menopausal. that is…no longer subject to hormones and thus ‘de-womanized’ so to speak. if a woman is ever suitable for a leadership role perhaps those ‘of a certain age’ are it. she’s been castrated (bad news) but rendered a generic human being (good news).

food for thought. i wouldn’t count out the post-menopausal as presidential material.

“food for thought. i wouldn’t count out the post-menopausal as presidential material.”

Being the liberal you are, you wouldn’t. A woman is always a woman, never mind the hormones. Women can’t lead. They’re all weak. Hell, most men are weak too. It takes a very special person to be a good leader, not just anyone can pull it off, most definitely not a mediocre women whose whole life she’s been nothing but too stupid to realize how ruinous progressivism is. By her own admissions she is a progressive. The absence of female hormones don’t change that.

She’s always viewed as the power behind Bill, bullshit. He’s 10 times more vicious than she is. Even though I can’t stand him, he’s very alpha-like. The only reason I don’t consider him a true alpha is because he is a big liar, traitor for selling us to the Saudis, can’t keep a promise, and lacks honor. Sleeping with many women is just not enough to make one alpha. But at least he’s a self-made man. He comes from a similar background to Obama – his mother also a single ho who slept with many men and had Bill before she finally married his stepfather. Only the American public is stupid enough/liberal enough to vote for two presidents with such a history. Anyway, because he’s a self-made man I have to give him kudos. But that’s where it ends.

a)Not making anything up.
b)Fuck with my head how? Or why?
Anyway, I certainly never thought of Mrs. Clinton as hot, but that was in the 90’s, before she became the shambling matron you see today.
And for a good number of Black guys, white skin, blonde hair & blue eyes do indeed seem to be enough.

You know the best (legal) solution to feminists? Ignore them. Ultimately, they thrive on attention just like all women – by hook or by crook. Since the former is unavailable to them, they aim for the latter. Let them scream all they want.

No no. Don’t you see? They’ve already won, legally. For 40 years we’ve had “no fault” divorce law, and that will never change. We are doomed. No fault divorce allows divorce theft. The tired old complaint that men are afraid of “commitment” is total BS. There is no “commitment” because the woman ends it when her hormones tell her she’s not quite happy enough. The marriage contract that is formed in the absence of a “prenup” that affirmatively changes it would be declared unconscionable if it were “consciously” signed as a prenup. Think about that last sentence carefully. A standard marriage contract is wholly unconscionable and unfair to the person with higher income and assets, which of course is usually the man. It’s not about feminist screaming in the streets. They already won, *legally*, thanks to the failure that is the boomer generation.

If only it were true that to let them scream all they want is a good policy. Unfortunately, they have influence and they shape policy. What they need is to be fought – fire with fire – and shaming. They are not called bitches for nothing; all they do is bark all day long spewing their hate, lies, and half-truths. If this country has any chance, they have to be shown for the non-intelligent persons they are, so that college-age women don’t fall for their trickery. Again, we have to take back control of education to make such changes take effect.

Feminist scrunts like this one, and her collectivist fellow travelers, are the reason I’m moving all of my business to cash and the black market. I’m not going to play by the rules of an all powerful state that thinks it owns the fruit of my labor, one that exists for the purpose of shoveling my money toward parasites in exchange for votes. No.

My willingness to participate in the taxable economy is over. Single mothers and all other self-righteous layabouts can find some other host to attach themselves to.

Not much experience is needed in order to know human weakness, and to understand that men—especially the young, ….. growing used to the employment of anti-conceptive practices, may finally lose respect for the woman and, no longer caring for her physical and psychological equilibrium, may come to the point of considering her as a mere instrument of selfish enjoyment, and no longer as his respected and beloved companion” (HV 17).

You guys realize it’s married, high IQ, high earning females in nice jobs who are demanding flex time, maternity leave, etc. the most right? If you give a smart woman a binary choice between a career and children they will choose the career. Then you end up with stupid or weirdly religious women having the highest fertility.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Intelligence =/= common sense. The qualities you’re describing spring from common sense. Intelligent people do plenty to screw up their lives and the lives of others. You honestly think it’s the women who supplement their intelligence with common sense that make the greatest mistakes in these areas?

Wait, first you say that it’s the career women who are demanding the various lifestyle accountrements that allow them to get away from their careers for their children, then you say that, given the choice, they’ll choose the careers over children?

Or are you saying they’re able to sit on the fence, so they’re doing that?

I seem to remember a Feminist quote (which I can’t find despite my best efforts), that basically said that Feminism had to remove a woman’s choice to either have a career or children. The justification was that if that choice was left available, most women (as in almost all of them) would choose to have kids over a career.

So, either that feminist was wrong, the vast majority of women are idiots (by your reasoning), or you’re talking out of your ass. Which is it?

Most of the history of our species has resembled the Dark Ages in Europe – an endless hack-fest of nearly mindless violence, cruelty, and the systematic killing of anyone with much in the way of insight, patience, or reasoned good-will.
A guy named Cahill wrote a book recently about how some Monks on the outer fringes of the coast of Britain turned it all around in the 6,7th centuries.
It could be seen, by some people. as an inspiring story bringing hope… but not by us. We have not even begun to pay the price

They’re already doing this in England. Let me know how good that’s working out….

I’m of the opinion that all leftists, socialists, and other people of her sort that have nothing better to do than decide how other people’s money should be spent should be taxed at 99%. Give them enough for a flat in Bed-Stuy or some other hellhole, an EBT card limited to $300 for chow and incidentals, and give the rest of their cash to their causes they’re so willing to celebrate. Once that money runs out, then the productive members of society can vote on how much they want to fund those programs.

I bet their tune would change REAL fast once they’re forced to put their money where their mouth is.

A love/hate dichotomy with this essay.
Extol the message, including the delivery. Bronx cheer to the buffoonery it addresses.
Send ‘newly minted’ to live like and among the fatherless who congregate within the projects for a few years, sans any big brother. Not only would the tune change but the pitch – to fear shrill.

Legitimate fatherhood – “ideas that the Left has been working to eradicate for decades” – is what is wished upon to all social strata? The resulting feral community isn’t akin to ‘hot yoga’ or any other trendy indulgences but rather a condition that lasts into perpetuity. A pink slip is issued to the forces working toward this goal.

“these are not plagues or social ills that pose a threat to the otherwise normal structures of everyday life. They are our new social reality.”

It being a widespread social reality does not mean it is not a plague, Hartardie.

People dying during the Second World War was also a social reality…

I love the idea of Steve Canyon.

No more anonymous democracy. Your vote will be tracked. If you vote for the welfare statists, you will be taxed accordingly, if you vote for the smaller governmentists, you will receive less welfare benefit, but will also be taxed less.

The idea that they don’t need a man to raise a family is absurd. Even if you ignore that they can only function with out a man is because everything that a man did traditionaly has been subsituted by the government who on earth do they think pays for the welfare state ?

Men are overwhelming net tax payers and women net tax consumers (not to mention the cost of legislation to make the workplace more female friendly). The social paradigm the left advocates where women should have any lifestyle they choose subsidised by the welfare state reduces men to mere cattle.

C’mon, just admit it – you’re a flaming idiot. I mean, a flaming liberal. Sorry.

Well, actually you are an idiot because you don’t seem to understand that I am not trying to make people like me. I am who I am, and my opinions are my opinions. No liberals need apply. Yet, when someone makes sense or merely tries to be polite, even if I don’t agree with them I will return kindness or politeness.

That said, I think Liberal women are ugh. It’s based on my observations, and I am sorry it hurts your feelings that I’ve observed this. From what I have noticed, If they are young liberals, they often look like tomboyish slobs. Sorry, I don’t dress like a tomboyish slob. And if they are old hags, they are usually fat, have short haircuts or wild hair that doesn’t get stylishly cut very often, not to mention growing gray they don’t bother to color. It’s beyond me how women can let themselves go like these old hags do. I am not surprised their hubbies end up cheating on them.

On the other hand, we conservative girls, are much more feminine. We wear heels, wear sexy outfits, put on makeup, keep trim and fit, have long hair, etc…. Liberal women wouldn’t get caught looking like that. After all, it’s disrespectful for a woman to look like a sex objects, they often say. Conservative women have no problems with their femininity, they don’t try to hide it and look like butch, and they do enjoy male advances, unlike liberal bitchy feminists hos.

I do hope you enjoyed my unleashing at your Liberal comrades, the feminists. It was good for me. Was it good for you too?

Here’s the thing about “beta” males: I have made many of the arguments which Heartiste makes in his fine article. And what is the standard “beta” response? They stamp their feet and cry: “You just hate womyn! Wah” (break so John Q. Sensitive can turn on the tears).

You can show “betas” how system is rigged against them. You can demonstrate how females in their natural habitat will use “betas” for the crassest financial support. You can do a Power Point ™ presentation on how females will dump “betas” for the first “alpha” to march out of county lockup. And after all that, the “beta” males will thump their chests and compete with each other to show how much they support womyn. And play the usual game of victimizing other men by supporting every last piece of feminizt tomfoolery, from VAWA to slutwalks to the child support Cheka.

That’s the weird thing about the “alpha” / “beta” male dichotomy: it sounds nutty but it really is there. It does describe what appears to be two entirely types of males. Just look at the sort of people who compose “male” feminists, the sorts whom MRAs sometimes call manginas: Uber-Betas. Males who flutter around feminizts, flattering them as independent-sassy-feisty womyn, but then marching alongside the helpless widdle pwincesses in slutwalks and white ribbon campaigns to protect them from big bad other men (i.e., the same “alpha” males for whom those same pwincesses secretly lubricate–see any Disney cartoon flik).

Why do “beta” males behave this way? From what I see, they believe that “If I am nice to womyn, womyn will bestow their vaginae upon me.” Of course, any self-respecting female (and a lot of non-self-respecters) have only contempt for “betas.” Hence, the escalating and increasingly absurdist feminizt demands.

Meantime, “alpha” males are making out like gangbusters, or retiring to monasteries to save whatever remnants are left of civilization.

25 percent of men are living at home under the age of 30. most of them are living at home because they cannot afford to move out. how much more can you tax the average man?
Today, Americans who rely on government entitlements receive an average of $32,700 worth of benefits. The average American’s income after taxes–Americans who work, not those who receive benefits–is $32,400. This is the first time in history that we have seen this inversion. I realize that this is just an average; but the numbers show, by a tiny amount, that the average recipient of entitlements has more disposable wealth than the average wage earner.
fromhttp://www.facebook.com/notes/judge-andrew-napolitano/how-far-we-have-come-from-the-freedom-the-framers-intended/10151266288213416
how far do the feminists want to take this? .

Heh … a minor field report seems germane here. I was out Wednesday night at a bar, it was pretty cock heavy but there was this one reasonably cute older girl who it turns out was a long term single mom (chronic loser ex). I open and half-heartedly game but she ate it up.

All I’m doing is holding masculine frame and bantering and trying to build some deep rapport, but that’s a little tough because she’s a bit drunk. She even uses the oldest come-on in the female book, you have nice eyes. She barely shit-tested me at all, the main challenge is walking the line as she talks about her ex and the bad boys her daughter likes. Her body language says she wants to be kissed so OK I did that, but I’m in a relationship and my girl is younger and in better shape, so no close.

For availability of casual sex the matrilineal model is certainly easier but the women lower general quality. It’s like there’s hardly any need to know any real game with single moms. It wasn’t even close to my best, I felt like I was gaming like I did in my beta days, just without anti-game mostakes but that was all that was needed.

most men would prefer not dating women who have kids, especially if she has young kids, so the single mom has to be easier ( as more of an easy lay or more a whore ) to get men interested in her which ironically ( in many case) was what got her into becoming a single mom; being too easy…becoming involved with men who only want to do her and then dump her

well as the sayng goes,

she made her bed so now she sleeps in it
… with a lot of guys who will not stick around

But of course feminists don’t really want men removed from their lives; they love having de facto castrated beta males foot their bills, and the bills of their unholy unclaimed consolidated stem cell packages. A massive transfer of wealth from quasi-cuckolded beta males to feckless females is the *whole point*, the UR PURPOSE, of feminism. It is giving women what they want — money and support — to do as they please, without asking of them anything in return (typically, sex and fidelity).

Props on squeezing in that ur.

So much meaning and universal application captured in so few letters… bless those krauts. 😉

“If this were to happen, and feminists were taken at their word and bequeathed a world in which all male influence was excised from their lives and they were left to fend for themselves and their bastard spawn, empowered and self-actualized, the resulting river of blood and the symphony of children’s cries reverberating through hell’s heart itself would quickly, very quickly I predict, disabuse feminist cunts of the luxury of their man and father hatred.”

The sad part is- our newly converted feminist antagonist graduated from one of the finest institutions in our nation, probably scored higher than me on the SAT, tried harder in school, yet still doesn’t know how to think logically. Signs of a broken education system.

The whole point of the education system is to destroy common logic. Leftism cannot exist if the populace is thinking logically, as it is a deeply dissonant ideology and fundamentally contrary to basic human nature. Therefore, that girl is the exact product that her teachers sought to produce.

Without child support laws people like ME are forced to pay for YOUR kids.

The citizens comprising society at large should not be required to support (via welfare, paid for with taxes) the children of other citizens. In essence, the idea is that single mothers depending on welfare handouts to survive are a financial problem for the state. Therefore, the fathers in these cases should be paying child support to reimburse the state for, or remove the need for, welfare expenditures.