At Sat, 3 Apr 2010 18:30:57 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
> Does it make sense to give this revision to define-struct a different
> name and keep the same old define-struct around from scheme/base?
Lots of other forms and procedures have `struct' in the name, so if we
just change `struct' to something else, we'd either have a mismatch or
have many other changes.
Or did you have a different kind of change in mind?