Nicene Creed

I believe in God, the Father, the Almighty,maker of heaven and earth,and all that is seen and unseen.I believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ,the only Son of God, eternally begotten of the Father,God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God,begotten, not made, one in Being with the Father.Through him all things were made.For us men and for our salvation he came down from heaven:by the power of the Holy Spirit he was born of the Virgin Mary,and became man.For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate; he suffered, died, and was buried.On the third day he rose againin fulfilment of the Scriptures; he ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father.He will come again in gloryto judge the living and the dead, and His kingdom will have no end.I believe in the Holy Spirit,the Lord, the giver of life,who proceeds from the Father and the Son.With the Father and the Son he is worshipped and glorified.He has spoken through the Prophets.I believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church.I acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.I look for the resurrection of the dead,and the life of the world to come.Amen

Defeat the HHS

...Original Sin is not a Capital Crime.

The Mission of this Blog

The Mission of this Blog is to bring light and truth to the world of those horrible events which comprise the satanic and masonic attack on Holy Mother Church called the French Revolution, and those attacks which continue today throughout the world.

I shall endevour to confine myself to the historical aspects including those events and persons which inspired, or were inspired by that period of French history, and how they relate to today.

I am a Roman Catholic in good standing, well Baptised and brought up in the Faith.

I am a Monarchist, and therefore I believe that a republican form of government is repugnant, and unsupported by scripture.

I believe that the American Revolution, and French Revolutions, including the Paris commune, were the inspiration for the communist revolutions.

I believe that God and God alone, not the masses, is the source of authority from whom all rulers, including presidents, are soley responsible.

I believe that His Most Christian Majesty in the person of Louis-Alphonse, Duc d'Anjou is the true and rightful King of France, and by God's Grace shall be restored to the ancient throne of France.

Jeanne La Pucelle

About Me

Sieur de Brantigny, dit Boisvert, witnessed by the Blessed Mother and the whole Court of Heaven, do solemnly swear by the Holy Gospels (which I touch with my hand) to be loyal and true to Monseigneur le Prince, Louis, le duc d'Anjou, de jure His Most Christian Majesty, Louis XX, by God's Grace King of France and Navarre and that I will do all that lays in my power to bring about his restoration to the Throne of his forefathers and the instauration of the Social Reign of the Sacred and Immaculate Hearts in France and throughout the world. So help me God.
Vive Le Roi! Vive le Roi! Vive le Roi!
.............................
Ret Marine, 22.5 yrs A/D 01/11/73-09/01/95. Member DAV,
Catechist Diocese of Richmond Va.

Followers

The "Cocarde Blanche" Award

Click on the Prince to see the current awardees

Prayer of Saint Richard

Thanks be to Thee, my Lord Jesus Christ,For all the benefits Thou hast won for me,For all the pains and insults Thou hast borne for me.O most merciful Redeemer, Friend, and Brother,May I know Thee more clearly,Love Thee more dearly,And follow Thee more nearly:For ever and ever.

21.8.08

Thoughts from Alexandr Solzhenitsyn

I once had the pleasure of hearing Alexandr Solzhenitsyn's son Ignat perform as a conductor and pianist. It was a moment I will never forget. Today as a first article upon my return I publish a letter I received from the Reverend Joseph Johnson. His letter was a forward to me, I can not trace down the original owner of the letter, but I did find a transcript of the original address, here. He is profound and possibly his death will foster a renewed interest in his works...

August 13, 2008

The faculty of Harvard University admired Alexandr Solzhenitsyn for his literary achievements, so they were thrilled that he agreed to deliver the university’s 1978 commencement address. But almost as soon as he began to speak, the professors changed their minds: too late. As I (1) wrote this month in CHRISTIANITY TODAY, they realized that Solzhenitsyn was charging them with complicity in the West’s surrender to liberal secularism, the abandonment of its Christian heritage, and of all the moral horrors that followed.

For example, describing the Western worldview as “rationalistic humanism,” Solzhenitsyn decried the loss of “our concept of a Supreme Complete Entity which used to restrain our passions and our irresponsibility.” Man has become “the master of this world . . . who bears no evil within himself,” he announced. “So all the defects of life” are attributed to “wrong social systems.”

Solzhenitsyn argued that this moral impoverishment had led to a debased definition of freedom, which makes no distinction between “freedoms for good” or “freedoms for evil.” Our founders, he reminded us, would scarcely have countenanced “all this freedom with no purpose” but for the “satisfaction of one’s whims;” they demanded freedom be granted conditionally upon the individual’s constant exercise of his religious responsibilities.

Solzhenitsyn could hardly have imagined that, just 14 years later, the U.S. Supreme Court would enshrine this radical definition of freedom: “At the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.”

Solzhenitsyn also foresaw the rise of political correctness. “Fashionable trends of thoughts and ideas,” he said, “are fastidiously separated from those that are not fashionable.” He predicted this would lead to “strong mass prejudices” with people being “hemmed in by the idols of the prevailing fad.”

Could even Solzhenitsyn have imagined that sexual rights would in 30 years triumph over free expression, that academia would impose rigid speech codes, or that churches would be threatened with the loss of their tax-exempt status for opposing the homosexual agenda?

On that June day, 30 years ago, Solzhenistsyn predicted that, in time, we would become more concerned with the civil rights of terrorists than with our own national security. Could he have imagined that 30 years later to the week, the Supreme Court, in the case of BOUMEDIENE v. BUSH, would uphold the civil rights of enemy combatants held at Guantanamo Bay?

Solzhenitsyn also charged the West with losing its “civic courage . . . particularly noticeable among the ruling and intellectual elites.” After all, he said, with “unlimited freedom on the choice of pleasures,” why should one risk one’s precious life in defense of the common good?

Three decades after Solzhenitsyn’s speech, Americans find themselves in the grip of violent and pornographic “entertainment,” growing censorship of unfashionable ideas, a new wave of isolationism, and a spiritually exhausted citizenry.

The solution Solzhenitsyn offered at the Harvard commencement was for a “spiritual blaze.” The question is, have we listened? Do we see signs of awakening? And is there still time to renew ourselves out of our “spiritual exhaustion”?

Jhesu+Mariede Brantigny

(1) I could not find the original article. The web site I was provided gave me an error for the URL.