Summary

Facts

Animal rights activists obtained from an infiltrator copies of a pharmaceutical company’s confidential internal documents. These were placed on the internet. The company, having taken steps to persuade the ISPs to remove the material sought an injunction to restrain further disclosure and orders for delivery up.

Issue

Had internet publication resulted in so much information coming into the public domain that the injunctions should be refused?

Held

Injunctions granted

Comment

In this case it was possible to obtain injunctions, and to prevent substantial dissemination of the confidential information at issue, despite the opportunities that exist to use the internet to place information in the public domain and thereby potentially defeat a claim to commercial confidentiality. Success depended heavily on the vigorous steps taken through internet experts to persuade ISPs to close down sites in various jurisdictions.

More from 5RB

2018 Chambers and Partners on 5RB2018 Chambers and Partners on 5RB

5RB is the pre-eminent set in the area for handling defamation, privacy, contempt and data protection matters. Interviewees praise the set for having great depth and quality of counsel, and note that it boasts many of the top barristers in the field. Get the lowdown here.

New 22nd Edition of Clerk & Lindsell on Torts, published by Sweet & Maxwell. Further info here.

Golden Eye 'Pay or Else' LetterGolden Eye 'Pay or Else' Letter

In this article, first published onLexis®PSL IP & IT , 5RB‘s Christina Michalos looks at the issues surrounding speculative/volume invoicing (“pay or else”) for copyright infringement in relation to downloading from file sharing websites. Read the full articlehere.