Tuesday, 4 October 2011

Kercher family still seeking answers after acquittals

The search will go on to find out what really happened on the night UK student Meredith Kercher was murdered in Italy four years ago, her family has said.

Speaking after an Italian court cleared Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito of murder, Meredith's brother Lyle said it felt like it was "back to square one".
Italian prosecutors say they will appeal. Only Rudy Guede, 24, has been convicted for Miss Kercher's murder.
Knox has since left Italy and is on her way back to the US.
It is understood she is travelling back to her hometown of Seattle on a commercial flight.
Speaking to reporters in Perugia, where his sister was studying at the time of her death, Mr Kercher said: "We accept the decision and respect the court and the Italian justice system.
"We do find we are now left looking at this again and thinking how a decision that was so certain two years ago has been so emphatically overturned, which raises other questions.

Amanda Knox makes her way through the departure lounge to board a flight out of Italy

"It feels very much like back to square one. The search goes on to find out what really happened."
During a separate earlier trial, Guede was convicted of Miss Kercher's murder and sentenced to 30 years in prison. On appeal, his conviction was upheld but his sentence reduced to 16 years.
It was said in court that Guede did not act alone. This now raises significant questions following the acquittals as to who had also been at the murder scene.
Meredith's sister, Stephanie, said the "biggest disappointment" was still not knowing what happened and knowing "someone or people out there" were responsible.
"It's still very difficult to speak in terms of forgiveness," she added.
"Until the truth comes out, we can't forgive anyone because no-one's even admitted to it knowing there was someone out there who was responsible."

Analysis

Daniel SandfordBBC News, Perugia

There was a stark contrast between the real-life courtroom last night, and the calm sadness of this morning.
Yesterday one family was celebrating, and crying with joy. Today another family was left with a pile of unanswered questions.
Quietly, stoically, Meredith Kercher's mother, brother and sister answered the questions that were asked. Can you forgive? Who do you blame?
But the big question they want answered is who killed their beloved daughter, their sister and how?
And as they told us, more than ever there is no definitive answer to that question.

"Of something so terrible happening, when basically she was in the safest place, her bedroom."
Prosecutors said Miss Kercher was killed in a brutal sex game which went wrong.
Mrs Kercher admitted she could appreciate why Knox would feel she had lost her life over the last few years.
"I don't think anyone's going to get off scot-free," she said. "Their lives have been disrupted - no-one is untouched by this."
Earlier, UK Prime Minister David Cameron said he felt sympathy for the Kerchers.
"They previously had an explanation about what happened to their daughter and they don't have that any more, and I think all of us should be thinking of them," he said.'Nightmare over' Knox, 24, and Mr Sollecito, 27, spent nearly four years in jail but their convictions were overturned on Monday after evidence was found to be unreliable.
The prosecution is to appeal to Italy's highest court, although it appears unlikely that Knox would be extradited back to Italy from the US.
An eight-member jury cleared both defendants of Miss Kercher's murder after doubts were raised over procedures used to gather DNA evidence.
The judge upheld Knox's conviction for slander for accusing bar owner Patrick Diya Lumumba of carrying out the killing. But he set the sentence at three years, time that Knox has already served, meaning she was free to leave.
She was ordered to pay him 22,000 euros (£18,800) in compensation.
Her family said she had "suffered for four years for a crime she did not commit".

Meredith Kercher was in Perugia for little more than two months before she was killed

Speaking on the steps of the court, Knox's sister Deanna said: "We are thankful to the court for having the courage to look for the truth and to overturn this conviction."
She said her sister's "nightmare was over" and asked for privacy for her family to recover from "this horrible ordeal".
Knox's lawyer, Carlo Della Vedova, said outside court that there was "no winner" in the case and the appeal court had "rectified a mistake".
"Meredith was a friend of Amanda - we should never forget this and we have to respect the sorrow of all the families," he told the BBC.
Mr Sollecito's father Francesco said he had "allowed himself some tears" following the verdict and said the court had "given me back my son".
Hundreds of people had gathered in the streets outside the court ahead of the verdict and some shouted "shame" when they heard about the decision, while others cheered.
During the appeal hearing Knox, who was serving 26 years in jail for the killing, had told a packed courtroom: "I did not kill, I did not rape, I did not steal. I was not there."
Tearful, and speaking in fluent Italian, she added: "I want to go back home. I want to go back to my life. I don't want to be punished. I don't want my life and my future to be taken away for something I didn't do because I am innocent."
Her ex-boyfriend, Mr Sollecito - who had been given a 25-year term after the initial trial - told the court that he was in a "nightmare" and said the claims against him were "totally untrue".
Miss Kercher, a student at Leeds University, had been sharing a cottage in Perugia with Knox during a year studying abroad.Contamination fear Prosecutors said she was killed in a brutal sex game which went wrong. Her throat had been slit and she had been sexually assaulted.

They maintain that Knox's DNA was on the handle of a kitchen knife - found in Mr Sollecito's flat and believed to be the murder weapon - with Miss Kercher's DNA on the blade.
They also said Mr Sollecito's DNA was on the clasp of Miss Kercher's bra.
But an independent review disputed those findings, raising concerns over poor procedures in evidence collection and forensic testing, and possible contamination.
It put in doubt the attribution of the DNA traces - collected from the crime scene 46 days after the murder.