If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

i didnt call him beastly (thats what i meant)
but i do think he can develop into a good reciever if he can catch the ball better.

he had a good season last year even though he would have had more touchdown catches if he didnt drop any of them.

but i think he can be a good reciever in this league. number 1, no, but maybe a decent number 2. that is if he can work on his catching

If I recall Washington is the 4 receiver behind Cedrick Wilson so I think you have a bit too much faith in him, at least from what I've seen of Nate's play. And I realize you meant beastly but its still just wow..........

Magical sig by OSUGiants

SSAEL....... its a new revolution!

Originally posted by Job

On another note, Nicklas Backstrom is amazingly good.

Meanwhile, in hockey the other night, the Washington Capitals' Eric Belanger gets hit with a stick, loses EIGHT teeth, has an instant root canal in the locker room, comes back out and PLAYS and never says boo.

So new rule, NBA: Unless you have a root canal at halftime, SHUT UP AND PLAY!

Comment

If I recall Washington is the 4 receiver behind Cedrick Wilson so I think you have a bit too much faith in him, at least from what I've seen of Nate's play. And I realize you meant beastly but its still just wow..........

no nate is mostly the third reciever
and if he is not he should be
i dont like cedrick wilson and i hope he gets cut

nate put up 35-624-4 plus he had a 17.8 ypc
while wilson put up 37-504-1 with a 13.6 ypc

Comment

dude have faith, since when did Ozzie screw enough things up for you not to trust him on this one, Willis is just a better back then Jamal. Willis is faster and is a bigger playmaker then Jamal, we need a play maker in the running game and Willis is a better one then Jamal.