The 2013 NHL trade deadline is next Wednesday at 1 p.m. MST, and the next week will be great for those who love trade rumours. One rumour got squashed yesterday when it was reported that Mikka Kiprusoff would not report to his new team if the Calgary Flames traded him, which of course was met by laughter amongst Edmonton fans.

Thankfully there are many other rumblings, rumours and potential deals floating around.

What will the Oilers do?

Nikolai Khabibulin made Doug Maclean's suggestion that he could fetch a 2nd rounder seem realistic after his 43-save performance last night.

The tougher question is are the Oilers better off having Khabibulin as a $1.2 million back up next year, or moving him for a draft pick?

So let's look at some of the options the Oilers have to trade. These thoughts are a combination of my views as well as what I've heard and read as far as pros and cons for each player from pundits and fans. I don't agree or disagree with all of them, but respect the differing views.

KHABIBULIN

Would he want to play for $1.2 million?

He turns 41next January, and age catches up with most players.

Unreliable due to injuries.

His history of injuries is the main concern. The interesting thing about Khabibulin is that he works incredibly hard to stay in shape. He's in really good shape, but you wonder if his body is breaking down. Maybe he pushes too hard, because he seems to tweak something every few weeks.

When he plays he's played very well. In six starts he has a sparkling 1.93 GAA and a .941SV%. Those numbers are unattainable over a long period, but we've seen that when he plays he can still win games.

He works well with Dubnyk. They have a healthy and respectful relationship.

I don't see the Oilers being able to overhaul the blueline in one summer. It would require three solid moves, and while it is possible, I'm not sure it is realistic. If the Oilers don't land highly touted college prospect Danny Dekeyser (who is good, but far from a saviour or lock to be a top-four), and another D-man via a trade of UFA signing (weak pool) then their D won't be much better next year and they will need a reliable back up.

RYAN WHITNEY

The free agent list isn't very good, especially for D-men under the age of 30.

Justin Schultz would be the only excellent puck mover remaining. The Oilers need D-men who can move the puck quickly and accurately to their skilled forwards.

The Oilers recent history of signing UFAs to come into Edmonton isn't great. There is no guarantee they will find a better replacement. There is also a good chance Whitney performs well in another environment. Being comfortable and feeling confident is a huge factor in how a player performs on the ice.

The advanced stats show he's struggled.

He will never be able to turn due to his surgeries.

It is clear the coaching staff doesn't have a lot of confidence in him. When that happens, usually it is hard to change it. If a player is worried about making a mistake and getting benched, usually they make more mistakes.

RYAN JONES

For a team that struggles to score ES, at least he can score 5-on-5.

He goes to the net regularly and scores garbage goals. Oilers don't have a lot of guys like that.

Jones is a complimentary player. He won't be a key cog in winning, but he's shown the ability to produce. While surrendering scoring chances doesn't look good on paper, scoring goals trumps that.

He is on the ice for way too many scoring chances against.

Teemu Hartikainen is bigger and can replace him.

He isn't physical enough on a team that desperately needs some guys who are harder to play against. He's a solid NHLer, but if needed they can find a veteran UFA to replace him.

I suspect those three would make garner the most interest, amongst players the Oilers would consider trading.

There are some other names that have been tossed around for the Oilers...

Ladislav Smid

I think the Oilers would be foolish to deal him. I outlined the available free agent D-men yesterday, and no one on that list looks like a potential upgrade to Smid. Smid knows his role and he's good at it. He plays hard and is the most physical D-man who plays every night. I still believe the Oilers and Smid will come to an agreement prior to April 3rd. If they don't we can chat about then after the 3rd.

Ales Hemsky

If you trade him at the deadline you are likely only getting picks and prospects in return. At this point in the rebuild the Oilers need to move him in a deal where you get a proven NHL player back in return rather than picks. He's played much better now that his shoulder issues are behind him and I suspect there would be more interest in the summer.

Sam Gagner

Gagner has been the lightning rod for years in Edmonton. He's had a great start to the season and will get a raise on his current $3.2 million contract this summer. His trade value is much higher now than it was last year, so the return would be better. Gagner is very popular in the dressing room, he has worked hard at improving his game and no one questions his desire. I don't see any reason to move him at the deadline, and if he they consider moving him in the summer they have to get a solid D-man of big, skilled forward in return. I don't trade Gagner for anything less than a proven player.

LOOKING AHEAD

No one knows what the future holds, but at some point the results have to match the "potential"and "patience" that has been talked about for years in Edmonton.

For me there is one obvious conclusion coming for the Edmonton Oilers. They won't be able to move forward with all six of their young 19-23 year-old forwards. They don't have the right combination of size, skill and sandpaper needed to succeed in the NHL. That doesn't mean they all won't be successful NHL players, it just means I don't see all of them developing with the Oilers.

Taylor Hall and Jordan Eberle will make $6 million next year. Gagner is in line for a raise that will put him close to $5 million next year and Ryan Nugent-Hopkins likely gets a contract similar to Hall and Eberle starting in 2014.

The Oilers still haven't found a recipe to win, and when they do they won't be able to afford all of their young stars, even if you believe they can win with six skilled forwards.

The Oilers need to get some size down the middle, improve their blueline and get some productive veterans into their lineup. The issue is many think they can do this without trading any of their young skilled players. Reality check, that isn't going to be possible.

The way I see it the Oilers will end up moving two, maybe three players amongst Hemsky, Gagner, Magnus Paajarvi and Nail Yakupov. You might not like that reality, but I don't see any other way this team will be able to improve and afford their lineup if they don't make those types of moves.

There is a good chance that the Oilers trade those guys and they put up decent numbers on another team, and likely more than the players coming to Edmonton, but that doesn't mean the Oilers will lose those trades. If they acquire a strong, steady defenceman for one of them that makes them more competitive.

If they acquire a skilled forward who plays physical, scores, is a good puck retriever and goes to the net that will make them better. The Oilers will still have three very good skilled players remaining, in Hall, RNH and Eberle and one or two of 64, 89, 91 and 83.

You can't expect the Oilers to have six forwards score 55+ points regularly. It just doesn't happen in today's game. You need a good mix in your lineup. You need some some skilled players with size and grit. Suggesting you don't doesn't jive with teams that win championships.

Here are the top scorers, with at least 34 points, of the last four Cup winners:

LOS ANGELES

Player

Pos

GP

G

A

P

Anze Kopitar

C

82

25

51

76

Justin Williams

R

82

22

37

59

Dustin Brown

R

82

22

32

54

Mike Richards

C

74

18

26

44

Drew Doughty

D

77

10

26

36

Jeff Carter

L

55

21

13

34

BOSTON

Player

Pos

GP

G

A

P

Milan Lucic

L

79

30

32

62

David Krejci

C

75

13

49

62

Patrice Bergeron

C

80

22

35

57

Nathan Horton

R

80

26

27

53

Mark Recchi

R

81

14

34

48

Tomas Kaberle

D

82

4

43

47

Zdeno Chara

D

81

14

30

44

Brad Marchand

L

77

21

20

41

Rich Peverley

C

82

18

23

41

Michael Ryder

R

79

18

23

41

CHICAGO

Pos

GP

G

A

P

Patrick Kane

R

82

30

58

88

Duncan Keith

D

82

14

55

69

Jonathan Toews

C

76

25

43

68

Patrick Sharp

L

82

25

41

66

Marian Hossa

R

57

24

27

51

Kris Versteeg

R

79

20

24

44

Troy Brouwer

R

78

22

18

40

Andrew Ladd

L

82

17

21

38

Brian Campbell

D

68

7

31

38

PITTSBURGH

Evgeni Malkin

C

82

35

78

113

Sidney Crosby

C

77

33

70

103

Chris Kunitz

L

82

23

30

53

Jordan Staal

C

82

22

27

49

Bill Guerin

R

78

21

27

48

Petr Sykora

R

76

25

21

46

Ruslan Fedotenko

L

65

16

23

39

Miroslav Satan

R

65

17

19

36

Tyler Kennedy

C

67

15

20

35

Do you honestly believe the Oilers top-six resembles any of those teams?

The reality is the Oilers will need to move some of their skilled forwards.

The difficult question will be when and who?

THINKING OUTLOUD...

Yesterday on my radio show, I asked Jason Strudwick if he'd deal Nail Yakupov for David Clarkson. Of course the deal would hinge on Clarkson having a new contract and the Oilers getting something else in return. It wasn't a one-for-one deal.

The point of the question was to point out that the Oilers will need to trade away a skilled player; one who likely will produce points elsewhere. (Yakupov was just an example. Not saying he is the 1st one I'd trade) And by trading one or two of them away, that doesn't mean they are bad players. It just means the Oilers need to alter their lineup to become more successful.

The difficult decision for the Oilers GM, whoever that is when the time comes to trade one of them, is making the right move. The move won't be made solely on statistics. They will have to look at other things: contracts, attitude, competitive nature, size, etc.

It won't be easy, but it you believe it won't happen I think you are fooling yourself.

The reactions to the Clarkson topic ranged from "You're an idiot," to "Yakupov could be like Stamkos."

Both made me chuckle, but the latter really stuck with me. Stamkos is the best goal scorer in the game, so of course it is realistic to compare Yakupov to him because they were both #1 picks and because Yakupov has a good one-timer. I hope for Yakupov's sake he becomes like Stamkos, but Stamkos has more to his game than a great one-timer. Stamkos has incredibly high hockey sense, and he's excellent at anticipating where the openings are in the offensive zone to get himself in good scoring areas.

Yakupov might become a very good scorer, but suggesting he'll be like Stamkos is the ultimate best-case scenario. It is unlikely, however. Just like it is unlikely that the first overall picks taken between Stamkos and Yakupov, John Tavares, Hall and RNH, will score as often as Stamkos.

Many people want the Oilers to acquire good players, but they aren't willing to give up anything of substance. Instead they want to offer up spare parts, usually players you feel are junk, to get players like Clarkson, Lucic, Clowe or others.

If the Oilers are going to improve moving forward they will eventually need to change the mix amongst their top forwards. It will be a difficult decision, and the organization has to ensure they have the right guy calling the shots. Based on recent decisions, it is fair to question whether the current regime is prepared and able to make the right choice.

This type of trade will occur in the near future, and when it does, the Oilers must make the correct decision and they need the right man calling the shots.

One of Canada's most versatile sports personalities. Jason hosts The Jason Gregor Show, weekdays from 2 to 6 p.m., on TSN 1260, and he writes a column every Monday in the Edmonton Journal. You can follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/JasonGregor

Most people use TOI to determine who is their most important and used forwards...Usually their top-six

How does this contradict what I said? You didn't answer as to whether or not Horcoff is top six given his similar usage.

Most people define their lines by who plays on the top 2 EV lines, not necessarily by who are the best players. I never suggested he wasn't one of their best players, just that he didn't play top six minutes at EV - you know, the way people usually define lines (unless it contradicts their point I guess).

You said people define lines by ES, not TOI. Pretty straight forward. You tried to say Sharp wasn't in their top-six, ridiculous point.

I'm not sure how I focused on Clarkson when I never referenced the man. I'm focused on the fact that you seem to believe the team should trade high end players for marginal players because "intangibles". That kind of thinking is why bad teams stay bad.

Bad teams stay bad because they move veterans for prospects and picks, continually.

Who said marginal players? Oilers will trade a guy who might put up more points, but the fact it they all can't put up big numbers in Edmonton. History shows that, so they will sacrifice a guy with more scoring potential for guys with size, toughness, experience and skill.
Which I wrote in the article, but they need more size, toughness, and experience in their top six.

I used Clarkson as an example of the style of player. And stated that. Never said I would make that deal, used him as an example they type of player. I don't use Lucic cause Boston wouldn't trade him. Also Clarkson was 5th highest scorer on Cup finalist. I'd say he's a tad better than marginal. Seems to fit in as top-six forward. But I guess cause he doesn't score 70 points he's brutal.

You assumed, incorrectly, that I said give up elite for average/marginal. You took point to the extreme to make your point. Not sure why, other than to argue.

To repeat this back for clarity, you essentially said, "here is the type of trade they should make, but I'm not saying they should make this trade". Huh.

As for my taking your point to the extreme - every player I referenced was specifically mentioned in your post, so how I misunderstood or took it "to the extreme" is beyond me. Your premise is just that absurd to begin with.

You still haven't responded as to whether or not Horcoff is a top six player, or if Staal was in PIT.

Maybe when you let me know your preferred method of determining who is a top six player we can get somewhere, because right now it seems to be, "whoever Gregor says". Maybe you could write up a memo letting me know who you want to be each team's top six so we have a framework.

The most hilarious thing is that you haven't even used the one argument that clearly proves me wrong about Sharp. You just sputter about his minutes and points.

Speaking of "extreme" - how does it follow that because I wouldn't trade a #1 overall pick for Clarkson I believe he's "brutal" or that I believe he can't play in the top six? I don't even know what to say to such a brutal misrepresentation of anything I have ever said. There is probably no point in even addressing it.

Hey, you know Dustin Penner is big and played top six in the playoffs for a cup winner. We should probably offer Hopkins.