Because one of the main underlying arguments for the recount was the systems were hacked by Russia.

Yes. I'm aware of that. And, it's valid argument. If Russia did hack the DNC, as thought, why wouldn't they try to hack the election, if they
thought they could? Further, Donald Trump declared, again and again, that the election was rigged, and that he wouldn't say whether or not he'd
accept the results of the election, if he didn't win. So, was it rigged?

These are some of the arguments for the recount. If we can agree that these are the arguments for the recount, we can move on from there. For
example, it's unlikely that Russia could hack paper ballots, sure. But, the Russians aren't the only reason for the recount. Voter suppression is
also a thing.

For example, I Googled my polling place and showed up ready to vote. There was a note on the door instructing voters to go to another address. I
went there, and my address wasn't on their ledger. They sent me to a "supervisor" and she didn't have my name or address either! ??? I made a huge
stink, and after about 15 minutes they pulled out another set of ledgers, and lo and behold, my name was there, and I voted. A bunch of people were
complaining about "voter suppression" at my polling place. What if someone was hiding these ledgers, hoping that they could "steal" my unclaimed name
and address and vote twice, or give my ballot to an undocumented friend? Now, That's voter fraud.

These things can go either way, suppression and fraud to benefit Hillary/Trump, depending on your county. So, let them have their recount. It won't
change the election results, but what if it uncovers and exposes malfeasance? Isn't that a good thing?

Apparently Jill Stein is trying to pull a fast one. The fine print for those donating to the Jill Stein effort for a recount says any excess money
left over goes directly to Jill Steins personal non profit group. It also looks like George Soros is behind some of the donations.

Jill Stein has raised over $5.8 million with her fundraising campaign so far, but that’s not the incredible part. No, the part that will leave
you stunned is the fact that the fine print explicitly states the “excess” money will go directly into Jill Stein’s special “non-profit”
(sounds a lot like the Clinton Foundation).

And yet, thousands of people decided to donate anyways. While it’s already been confirmed that this is part of a larger scheme to undermine American
democracy (with George Soros as the epicenter of a majority of the funding), it’s simply a testament to a larger picture.

Donald Trump's incoming chief of staff suggests Hillary Clinton is backing away from a deal worked out between the two presidential campaigns on how
the loser would concede to the winner.

Reince Priebus tells "Fox News Sunday" that Clinton's team "cut a deal" with Trump's team specifying that once The Associated Press called the race in
favor of one candidate, the other would call within 15 minutes to concede.

If you ask those on the right they'll tell you voter suppression isn't a 'thing' and that, in fact, the government doesn't do enough to prevent people
from voting. Nevermind the fact that half of the voting age population doesn't even bother to vote and that scores of legal voters are intentionally
hindered from voting; long lines, closed polling places, unannounced polling location moves, or just straight up taken off of the voter rolls.

No, obviously, the real issue is the unproven idea that illegals and dead people are voting.

All of which are challenged in the courts via court orders for polling locations to remain open longer. Also many states have laws that require a
polling location to allow people to vote if they are in line prior to the scheduled close of the polling location.

Its interesting the Democrats have consistently maintained fraud does not occur while fighting against ID's to vote to all of a sudden throwing a
temper tantrum and blaming Russia and fraud for this election loss.

I'm not blaming fraud for this election. I'm blaming voter suppression, apathy and a genuinely bad candidate in Clinton.

I just don't understand how some people can be upset with 1 or 2 cases of voter fraud but are perfectly content with preventing millions of people
from legally voting. Why is stopping people from voting more important than getting more people to vote?

It is something Republicans want to address. Every time they try Democrats or other left wing groups attack the action as trying to disenfranchise
voters. When you have Obama telling illegals to go ut and vote while promising they wont be prosecuted you have a problem.

originally posted by: Xcathdra
Apparently Jill Stein is trying to pull a fast one. The fine print for those donating to the Jill Stein effort for a recount says any excess money
left over goes directly to Jill Steins personal non profit group. It also looks like George Soros is behind some of the donations.

Jill Stein has raised over $5.8 million with her fundraising campaign so far, but that’s not the incredible part. No, the part that will leave
you stunned is the fact that the fine print explicitly states the “excess” money will go directly into Jill Stein’s special “non-profit”
(sounds a lot like the Clinton Foundation).

And yet, thousands of people decided to donate anyways. While it’s already been confirmed that this is part of a larger scheme to undermine American
democracy (with George Soros as the epicenter of a majority of the funding), it’s simply a testament to a larger picture.

What do I mean? Very simply put:

Click link for entire article.

There's no doubt in my mind that Soros is behind it. It's who's behind Him I'd like to verify, and for what reasons, reasons I can guess at, but
without full verification other than my own instincts.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.