Ballast. Europe between Putin and Trump

Soon the final. And soon the beginning of the next cycle. We are not talking about the world cup. We are talking about relations between states.

More precisely, the relations between Russia and the eu, Russia and the United States, the us and the eu. It is clear that these relations will largely affect the overall state of world politics in general. The world's political leaders with interest and even some caution is not only waiting for the meeting between Putin and Trump, but the next NATO summit. Created by Trump image unpredictable a person's nervous leaders of the eu and NATO. Even those who have completely given their own state in the power of americans today understand: an era of change.

And, in addition to support the americans in all their endeavors in world politics, you must be corny to pay us the expenses to keep the american army, to buy american weapons and so on. In periodic communication with eu citizens the feeling that the conscience of Europe is changing. If earlier, ten or fifteen years ago, any conversation regarding NATO and the appearance of the block near Russian borders, in case of over aggressive "Is our own business! the case of the independent state!", now the rhetoric is changing. No, the representatives of young Europeans continue to stick to the same line. Remember your childhood backyard? in any yard there was always a weakling, which boasted big brother. A karate expert, a paratrooper, a marine, and the like.

The members of NATO and of the newly minted "Graduates" from the eternally offended talk about as today. "Here come the americans. "
quite a different mood in "Old Europe". People, in any way connected with defence or the army, began to understand that in the event of a conflict in Europe to fight and die have them. A long time, Europeans covered their fear of the notorious 5th paragraph of the NATO treaty. One for all and all for one! beautiful slogan.

But the times of chivalry are long gone. Today is the time of wolves. Talking about world unity is good only when the real enemy. When it is necessary to throw dust in the eyes.

Scare. And politics is all based on their own interests. The interests of their own state. About us already half-forgotten the case of Turkey in Europe remember. Than in any other countries better than Turkey? if the americans, the commanders of NATO, refused to help Erdogan, that is why they will not be able to deny any other country? the more that the members of the alliance are not very eager to die for the interests of the neighbors.

This has already directly spoken by almost all countries in the block. Yes, and the history of the eu know. In the recent history of the case, the United States began to fight "Grown-up" from the beginning of the war. Their tactics are known. Beat the weak, and in the case of a strong opponent wait for the time to look at our situation and join the winning side.

And up to this point to remain neutral, helping both sides. There is another oddity of the behavior of the United States today. On the one hand, americans are constantly putting pressure on European governments, demanding to fulfill the terms of the treaty in the area of allocation of funds from the state budget to the budget unit. But on the other hand, is known for his pro-american stance of the European politicians are louder and more vocal about the need for an independent European army. And talk about the military structure are already at the highest level. A parallel army? European NATO soldiers obey the command of the unit, and other European soldiers to the command of the European army.

Absurd? at first glance, really absurd. But if you dig a little deeper? and why the americans did not react to the possibility of alternative army in Europe? silent as a fish on ice. President Trump, who strongly emphasizes that he is a businessman, when occasion requires money on defense of Europe. America, Trump has no obligation to spend its own funds for the protection of the eu. I deliberately emphasized the image of a business person, not a politician.

Very convenient position. What can be demanded from the layman? alas, but mistakes are inevitable in this situation. Even the americans believe in this situation. Even the white house staff sometimes in his comments, admit such statements. And if you look at the results of the activities of the american president? the picture is quite different.

With a few exceptions, Trump clearly does its own election promises! the economy is on the rise. Foreign policy problems are solved. Senators bite each other and do not interfere with Trump. Europeans in the 90s — early 00's happily accepted into their ranks the countries of the former soviet bloc. You can understand them.

Who wants to relive the abominations of war? Europe was a necessary buffer on the Eastern borders. Buffer that in case of conflict and will become the battlefield. The baltic states, Poland, romania, hungary and other former socialist countries have become nothing more than sacrificial lambs. Europe has even gone so far as to pay for numerous political and economic "Experiments" mladoevropeytsev. And the emergence in these countries of the abm caused a complete delight of old Europe.

Russia blocked the americans! the eu under the american anti-missile umbrella!
the enthusiasm ended with the first volley of Russian cruise missiles at targets in syria. The american mirage of invulnerability disappeared. Security was the usual trap for fools. Moreover, the americans openly showed his players unwillingness to fight with a serious opponent.

And all these databases, which are elements of missile defense, designed not to protect Europe, and for the defense of the territory of the United States. Thus, the only hope of Europe left many troops of the americans, which are located in NATO countries. Any impact of Russia on Europe will "Hurt" us troops. This will automatically cause a reaction. American units are quickly deployed to the east and cover the Europeans. By the way, this view has been voiced before Poroshenko at the beginning of "Maidan".

European leaders have convinced the ukrainians that the United States will do with the Ukraine as well as it once did to Poland. Quickly organize the Reception of the eu and NATO. Will begin to pour huge amounts of money in creating infrastructure will create a military and naval base. And the European business will rush to Ukraine. Perhaps it would have happened.

If Ukraine lost crimea. And this loss completely confused card NATO command. And the american interest quickly faded. By inertia they continue to provide military assistance to the apu, but conversations about more substantial assistance is not conducted.

Spending money on civil war in UkraineTrump is not going to. The maximum that can count Poroshenko, for the disposal of obsolete and decommissioned weapons of the U.S. Army. Even in the disposal of their own weapons, the americans make money. For example not far to seek.

Ukrainians gave a decommissioned coast guard cutter. But gave quite tricky. You must pay shipping of these boats, repairs and pilot training. Thus, the boat cost will be sold as new!. Another point to which we will turn our attention to an article in the Washington post.

The statement, which opened the baltic states:
"Nato on the front lines at the borders with Russia are forces abbreviated composition. Reserves will have to overcome hundreds of kilometers. And any delays due to bureaucracy, poor planning and a crumbling infrastructure will allow Russia to seize NATO territory in the baltics even before the U.S. Military will fill the 17 forms required for crossing the border of Germany and Poland.

Army atv will trudge through the narrow roads for slow-moving cargo vans, moving east across Europe. Rusty bridges may collapse under the weight of american tanks, because they are too weak. And the transfer of troops can hold the annoying passport controllers and stubborn railway company". Of course, imagine army trucks, tanks, armored personnel carriers, which during the war, comply with numerous forMalities, it is quite difficult. The subtle humor of the american reporters will not refuse.

Quotes from newspapers rather give the leaders of the baltic countries, and indeed European leaders, food for thought. In fact, the americans openly declare that to defend the baltic states they will not. Or rather, to fight in the region they do not want. And cannot, as shown by the results of several exercises in the region. In addition, if you carefully read the above quotes, the us just say about the unreliability of European allies like those!
in European military circles also understand that those units, which are now deployed in the baltic states, and in other Eastern European states would not be able to provide at least some resistance to the Russian army.

So at the next summit will be seriously proposed alternative. In Eastern Europe to host the american contingent, the composition is equal to the contingent in Germany. Moreover, European countries agree to pay part of the cost of maintaining troops. In fact, the Europeans offer us to return to the option of confrontation between the ussr and USA during the cold war. Then in Europe there were about 200000 american soldiers! but here we need more and military families to consider. And it's almost a half-million americans who need to relocate from the USA to the baltic states!
of course, 200 thousand soldiers is not four rotational battalion that NATO has today.

This is a serious military group, the contents of which will require a lot of money. And the placement of the amount of americans in a rather underdeveloped by European standards, countries will require huge investments in infrastructure development in these countries. There are several issues. Whether.

Facebook

Twitter

Google+

Pinterest

Comments (0)

Ukrainian media published a "sensation" — a letter from the Minister of energy of Ukraine Igor Nasalik Corporation "Rosatom", in which he allegedly invites Russian company to resume some of the projects of bilateral cooperation. B...

Special envoy of the US state Department "eliminates" the possibility of talks on the situation in the Donbass. He publicly rejected the Minsk agreement, which is today the only platform for any communication and consultation on t...

"Action" statement of the interior Minister of UK, Mr. Sajid Javid, has become a topic not only for world news, but for many analysts and experts are not shy of strategic issues and the omnipresent topic of the cold war. The main ...