"VIDEHA" (विदेह)was the name of the kingdome established by "NIMI-VIDEHA" or "NIMI-JANAKA" (निमि विदेह / निमि जनक) . He was the pioneer of this kingdome & the first king of VIDEHA.

Later on his son "MITHI-JANAKA" (मिथि जनक) became the second emperror & after him, his kingdom was named as "MITHILĀ" (मिथिला). In fact MITHI-JANAKA has established a town / city named "MITHILĀPURI / MITHILĀ NAGARI" (मिथिलापुरी / मिथिला नगरी) as the capital of "VIDEHA KINGDOME". Later the term "MITHILĀ" has expanded & became synonymous of the entire "VIDEHA KINGDOME". And the capital town "MITHILĀPURI / MITHILĀ NAGARI" was replaced by the name "JANAKPURI / JANAKPUR" (जनकपुरी / जनकपुर) .

Other important JANAKS were SIRDHWAJA JANAKA (सिरध्वज जनक, father of goddess SITA ; during the period of RAMAYANA) , KRITI JANAKA (कृति जनक) , KIRTI JANAK (कीर्त्ति जनक), BAHULĀSHWA JANAKA (बहुलाश्व जनक ; during the period of MAHĀBHĀRATA ) & KARĀLA JANAKA (कराल जनक). KARĀLA JANAKA was the last emperror of this dynesty, who had different view-points than the other Janakas. Hence most of then texts don’t add the suffix Janaka with his name & quote as “KARĀLA” (कराल ) only.

After The fall of Janaka dynesty , Mithila was fragmented in small provinces ruled by locally elected kings. This was a type of democracy. Although these “FRAGMENT PROVINCES” were ruled by different kings but due to cold war with Magadh (मगध) they formed a strong UNION / SANGHA (just like former USSR, USA, Union Republic Of India or Europian Union etc). They were united over military , economic & cultural levels (सैन्य-सामरिक, आर्थिक व सांस्कृतिक स्तर). This union was named as “VAJJI / BAJJI MAHASANGHA/ MAHAJANAPADA” (वज्जि/बज्जि महासंघ/महाजनपद). This was ever first phenomenon of “DEMOCRACY / REPUBLIC” (प्रजातण्त्र / जनतण्त्र / गणतण्त्र) all over the world.

VAJJI MAHĀJANPADA / MAHĀSANGHA (वज्जि महासंघ/महाजनपद) was initially formed by these MAITHIL SMALL PROVINCES (fragments of Mithila). Later some NON-MAITHIL SMALL PROVINCES (of NEPĀL / नेपाल ) also joined this union / mahasangha.

“VAISHĀLI” (वैशाली)was one of these “fragment provinces of MITHILĀ”. There was a highway from “LUMBINI / LICHCHHVI” (लुम्बिनी / लिच्छवी) to VAISHALI which was passing through ‘KUSHINAGAR”(कुशीनगर),” SHRĀVASTI” (श्रावस्ति / श्रावस्ती) etc. Since “GAUTAM BUDDHA / MAHATMĀ BUDDHA” (गौतम बुद्ध / महात्मा बुद्ध) had travelled through this highway hence Vaishali is more quoted in buddhistha texts. Moreover VAISHĀLI was the gateway of VAJJI MAHĀSANGHA & via this only Magadh emperror “AJĀTSHATRU” (अजातशत्रु) invaded into VAJJI. And this was a cause which made more quotations for Vashali than the other constituent provinces of Vajji Mahajanapada.

In the era of king "HARSHAVARDHANA" (हर्षवर्धन) this region was termed as "TIRBHUKTI" (तिरभुक्ति / तीरभुक्ति)i.e. the province / state which lies between the river-banks, because mithila is surrounded by rivers by 3 sides (namely the gangase,gandaka & koshi with their tributaries).

Hence all the above FIVE NAMES are synonymous & represent the same geographical landscape / area / region - not the the different areas / regions. Whoever says that they are different , is lying & making us fool & certainly trying to break us. Please be alert !!! ………………………….. And if all the above names are synonymous then how the languages MAITHILI, VAJJIKĀ, BAJJIKĀ & TIRHUTIYĀ may be different? In fact these are the SYNONYMS OF SAME LANGUAGE “MITHILĀ – BHĀSHĀ” (मिथिला - भाषा).

Moreover “ANGA PRADESH / CHAMPA”(अंग प्रदेश / चम्पा)historically never remained the part of HISTORICAL MITHILA KINGDOME. In fact this small region was the COLONIAL PROVINCE (उपनिवेश) of “KURU / KAURAVAS” (कुरु / कौरव) that was allocated to “KARNA” (कर्ण) by his friend “DURYODHANA” (दुर्योधन). It was influenced by MAGADHA time to time. During PAL DYNESTY (पाल राजवंश), it has the glorious history of having “VIKRAMSHILA UNIVERSITY” (विक्रमशिला विश्वविद्यालय). Even so, this region has the close cultural as well as linguistic connectionwith MITHILA. CHAUTHA-CHANDRA / CHAURCHAN (चौठ-चन्द्र/ चौरचन) is a unique festival of Mithila is also celebrated in this region,Some people regard “ANGIKĀ” (अंगिका) as a SEPARATE LANGUAGE while some regard as a DIALECT OF HINDI. If this is a dialect then certainly NOT OF HINDI but OF MAITHILI as per unbiased linguistic grounds. Sir GEORGE ABRAHAM GRIERSON has named it as CHHIKĀ-CHHIKI MAITHILI (छिका-छिकी मैथिली) & regarded as a DIALECT OF MAITHILI.

In fact merely such historical division of MITHILĀ & ANGA on the ground of transient political lines may not be a parameter for a separate / different language, otherwise the modern MAHĀRĀSTRA may have four different languages i.e. languages of Vidarbha, Marathwada, Khandesha, Paschima Maharastra etc.

During British rulings (in 1875), they divided the entireTIRHUT / MITHILĀ into TWO DIVISIONS namely MUZAFFARPUR & DARBHANGA as per their DIVIDE & RULE POLICY. At that time DARBHANGA division was constituted by modern Darbhanga, Madhubani, Samastipur, Saharsa, Supaul, Madhepura, Purnea & all the other remaining districts of EASTERN MITHILĀ. And then MUZAFFARPURdivision was constituted by Muzaffarpur, Vaishali, Sitamadhi / Sitamarhi, both Champarans i.e the WESTERN MITHILĀ.

Sir George Abraham Grierson, (born Jan. 7, 1851, Glenageary, County Dublin, Ire.—died March 9, 1941, Camberley, Surrey, Eng.), Irish linguistic language scholar and civil servant who conducted the Linguistic Survey of India (1898–1928), obtaining information on 364 languages and dialects.
While a student of mathematics at Trinity College, Dublin, Grierson took prizes in Sanskrit and Hindi.

At that time the BRITISH POLICY MAKERS had sawn the seeds of division that the language of DARBHANGA is MAITHILI & that of TIRHUT is TIRHUTIYĀ / BAJJIKĀ. Meanwhile a noble, unbiased linguist Sir GEORGE ABRAHAM GREARSON has recognised that MAITHILI is a separate, living language which has SEVERAL DILECTS including so called BAJJIKĀ & CHHIKA - CHHIKI MAITHILI (ANGIKĀ). Initially Sir G.A.Grearson was a little bit confused & had placed Maithili into the BIHARI language. But, soon he realised that it was a BLUNDER MISTAKE to place MAITHILI under BIHARI. He has confessed such facts during the survey of BANGLA, ORIYA & ASAMESE languages and mentioned that MAITHILI IS A SEPARATE LIVING LANGUAGE.

Later, even after independence a few peoples used to MISGUIDE the MAITHILS narrating the above mentioned DIVIDE & RULE POLICY . They even propagated this policy more saying that ANGA was a separate entity in history, hence their language can't be MAITHILI .

Formation of DARBHANGA, TIRHUT , BHAGALPUR etc. COMMISSIONARIES has also added fuel to this DIVIDE & RULE POLICY . Peoples have been wrongly taught that MAITHILI is the MOTHER TONGUE of only a few districts which fall under DARBHANGA COMMISSIONARY & that of TIRHUT COMMISSIONARY is TIRHUTIYA / BAJJIKA & that of BHAGALPUR COMMISSIONARY is ANGIKA / ANGICA. Here the term TIRHUT is forcibly restricted for only a few districts rather than the WHOLE MITHILĀ. Similarly, then BHAGALPUR COMMISSIONARY consists of BEGUSARAI, KHAGARIA, BHAGALPUR, BANKA & JAMUI etc. districts & they are taught (by some unknown forces) that their MOTHER TONGUE is ANGIKA instead of MAITHILI because ANGA was a different entity at the time of MAHABHARATA.

I am going to ask them that if mother tongue of so called ANGA & MITHILĀ can't be same merely because they were separate entities in history then how the language of BHOJPUR & a few people from MAURITIUS may be same? If the dilects from Darbhanga , Champaran, Vaishali, Purnea , Araria, Khagaria, Begusarai, Bhagalpur & other regions differ somewhat, then so what ? - this is a characteristic of a living language . Even dilects from Chhapra, Siwan, Arrah , Sasaram & Ballia etc. differs considerably - then how they claim for the same language ?

In fact this paintings depicts an strong unique cultural link between MITHILA & ANGA regions. This painting is characteristically carved / drawn / made by the females of these rgions.

Also called MADHUBANI PAINTING / ART because the U.S. research scholar Ms JENNIFER WILLIAMS first noticed this painting / art at MADHUBANI & quoted for rest of the world as MADHUBANI PAINTINGS (मधुबनी चित्रकारी / चित्रकला). But this name is erroneous because this painting is characteristic of the ENTIRE MITHILA (either of INDIA or NEPAL) including the so called ANGA.

So, I request toall MAITHILS (irrespective of age, sex, cast, religion, districts, regions) to understand the facts and reply the so called destructive forces peacefully by unity. Please don't be misguided by any such forces. Rest depends upon you - after all it is your freedom to accept the fact or being misguided.

Sir, if possible try to post the photos with brief information about Goutam Kund (tapobhumi of Maharshi Goutam ), Kapileshwar (Tapobhumiof Maharshi Kapil ),Mahishi ( birth place of MandanaMishra ),Birth place of Mahakavi Kalidas,Damouli (Birth place of Maharshi Vyas ),Panch pokhari( birth place of Brahmarshi Vishwamitra ),....etc.I am not from Mithilanchal but Mithilanchal is a holy place for me.Yajnavalkya ,Kanva, Madhyandina,Vishwamitra,Ashtavakra,Vyas,Goutam,Kanad,Kapil, Kumarilabhatta, MandanaMishra, Ubhayabharati,........are from this place.i appreciate your effort in preserving Mithila culture.