How specifically... do you determine which YouTubes are fact and which ones are totally bullshit. And which ones are half truth meant to mislead and confuse the gullible?

Randisist glad you stopped in buddy. Hope everything is good and well.

I would say if it’s a video defends secrecy and suppression of evidence, defends Bush and Cheney's secret testimony, defends FEMA, defends the gaps and inconsistencies that reveal fundamental flaws in NIST's analyses, defends destroying the evidence, defends FAA and NORAD, defends no black boxes, defends the government not letting investigators have unrestricted access to Ground Zero, defends the government not letting investigators have blueprints of the buildings, defends the fact that 9/11 Commission Report failed to even mention the destruction of Building 7, defends the fact that the 9/11 Commission Report denied the existence of the Twin Towers' core structures, defends commanders lying to the 9/11 Commission about the military response, defends the 911 commission…I can assure it was designed to mislead and confuse the gullible. If the person who created the video dismisses Operations Vigilant Warrior, Gulf of Tonkin false flag, Operation Northwoods, Operation Vigilant Guardian, and Operation Northern Vigilance... I can assure you it was designed to mislead and confuse the gullible. If the person dismisses… dismisses Hani Hanjour inability to fly, dismisses the stock trades, dismisses the fact that the alleged hijackers partied at topless bars and drank alcohol, despite being portrayed as fundamentalist Muslims and demises the fact that the government sold Americans a total lie, Bush put the Bin Laden Family on the first flight out of the country after 9/11, Bush was warned Bin Laden determined to strike in US, 36 days before 911, Bush told officials to back off before 911, Bush was warned Bin Laden wanted to hijack planes, NORAD had drills of planes as weapons, US intelligence officials had several warnings, Federal agency planned plane crash into building drill a year before 911, A plane crash is simulated inside the cardboard courtyard of the pentagon. The exercise was designed to help emergency personnel before 911, FBI knew terrorists were using flight schools, The US was told in 1998 that Arab terrorists were planing to fly a bomb-laden plane into the World Trade Center, Two years before 911 an analysis prepared for US intelligence warned that Osama Bin Laden's terrorists could hijack an airliner and fly it into government buildings etc…. this is beyond ridiculous already…

Yes, Hutch. I do. I see through this whole story. And I saw through it in the beginning when I questioned the fact that religious fanatics would be able to take over planes with boxers and execute this plan, then committ suicide.

To some people who are intelligent, Im sure this smelled fishy from the beginning.

To others, who watch tv and believe everything they are told, they are conditioned to accept it without questioning.

I will ask again what is the test to determine if a video uploaded to YouTube is fact or fiction?

I really wonder who someone is working for when they push YouTube videos as fact and run from the question as to how was it determined that the videos they champion are fact.

The last thing someone with a hidden agenda wants is for the "evidence" to be examined objectively OR for the validity to be questioned.

If it’s a 911 first responder, 911 family member, 911 grounds worker, professor, physicist, scientist, architect, or engineer speaking. I believe the person deserves to be listened to. It depends on the message, the messenger, and the type of video. It’s a judgment call I guess.

Randisist glad you stopped in buddy. Hope everything is good and well.

Money,

Life is good. Could always be better. Hope you and all yours are doing well.

My friend... I have faith at least you can understand I am not disputing any YouTube videos. I just know how easy it is to create facts. As to trusting the government... I trust the government as far as I can throw the White House.

My hidden agenda? Easy, to make people think and question the evidence. Human nature dictates that when people lie there is a desperation to be believed. When people tell the truth and are honest they do not have to have anybody believe them because they know that they are right.

If it’s a 911 first responder, 911 family member, 911 grounds worker, professor, physicist, scientist, architect, or engineer speaking. I believe the person deserves to be listened to. It depends on the message, the messenger, and the type of video. It’s a judgment call I guess.

Activities offered by advertising links to other sites may be deemed an illegal activity in certain jurisdictions. Viewers are specifically warned that they should inquire into the legality of participating in any games and/or activities offered by such other sites. The owner of this website assumes no responsibility for the actions by and makes no representation or endorsement of any of these games and/or activities offered by the advertiser. As a condition of viewing this website viewers agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from the viewer’s participation in any of the games and/or activities offered by the advertiser.