It was a debate which held Westminster – and the wider watching world – in its thrawl.

In the end, David Cameron secured the support of the house to conduct airstrikes on IS targets in Syria after an 11-hour back-and-forward discussion by MPs.

But who voted for it and who was against? You can use our widget below to search for your local MP to see on which side of the debate they ended up.

The four highly advanced jets sent to drop bombs in Syria on Wednesday night are war machines capable of destroying the most precise of targets at any time and in any conditions.

The Tornado GR4, one of the RAF's greatest assets, costs £35,000 per flight hour and can travel at speeds up to 1.3 mach - around 1,000mph.

The two-seater plane has been in service with the RAF for more than 30 years and can fly as high as 50,000ft. According to the Ministry of Defence, "a combination of major upgrade programmes and numerous continual enhancements has kept the aircraft amongst the forefront of all attack aircraft".

Meanwhile, Ken Livingstone, who is jointly leading a review into Labour's defence policy, suggested he would support efforts to deselect pro-war MPs.

The former London mayor told LBC: "If I had an MP who had voted to bomb Syria then I would be prepared to support someone to challenge him."

Mr Livingstone said Mr Benn's speech "could have been the opening of a leadership campaign".

Meanwhile, the shadow foreign secretary's niece Emily Benn demanded a retraction from a Scottish National Party MP who suggested her grandfather, left-wing stalwart Tony Benn, "must be turning in his grave" over his son's pro-war stance.

During Wednesday's debate East Lothian MP George Kerevan wrote on Twitter: "Benn summing up for Labour but voting with Tories. Benn's father must be turning in his grave."

Emily Benn - who has stood twice as a general election candidate for Labour - responded: "Mr Kerevan your last sentence is deeply offensive and simply not true. I hope you think again. Retract it."