Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Unless... you are a extreme leftwing Liberal... why would you listen to MSNBC or NBC ??

Just five days after affirming on air that he is a liberal, MSNBC
host Chris Matthews exclaimed that radical community organizer Saul
Alinsky is one of his heroes.

NO WONDER HE GETS A TINGLE UP HIS LEG WHEN HE TALKS OF OBAMA...ANOTHER LEFT WING RADICAL POSING A S A MODERATE!

Stated Matthews: “Well, to reach back to one of our heroes from the
past, from the ’60s, Saul Alinsky once said that even though both sides
have flaws in their arguments and you can always find something nuanced
about your own side you don’t like and it’s never perfect, you have to
act in the end like there’s simple black and white clarity between your
side and the other side or you don’t get anything done.

I always try to remind myself of Saul Alinsky when I get confused,”
Matthews said on his “Hardball” show, speaking to guest Sen. Bernie
Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist, on the topic of
President Obama’s health care plan.
See video of Matthews’ comments::
Matthews comments, from his Tuesday show, were noted by Newsbusters.com, which also documented the MSNBC host confirming one week ago that he is liberal.

SEE THE CLIP OF CHRIS MATHEWS CONFESSION HERE: http://youtu.be/bCryNzrcxWY

Alinsky is generally considered to be the founder of modern SOCIALIST community
organizing. He founded and trained community organizations to follow
his methods, including organizations in South Chicago, where President
Obama credits his political beginnings. The Washington Post reported
Obama was hired shortly after graduating from college by a group of
Alinsky’s disciples to be community organizer on Chicago’s South Side.

Former 1960s radical and FrontPageMagazine Editor David Horowitz
describes Alinsky as the “Communist/Marxist fellow-traveler who helped
establish the dual political tactics of confrontation and infiltration
that characterized the 1960s and have remained central to all subsequent
revolutionary movements in the United States.”
Horowitz writes in his 2009 pamphlet, “Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution. The Alinsky Model”:

“The strategy of working within the system until you can
accumulate enough power to destroy it was what sixties radicals called
‘boring from within.’…. Like termites, they set about to eat away at the
foundations of the building in expectation that one day they could
cause it to collapse.”

As WND reported,
Obama approached Northwestern University professor John L. McKnight – a
loyal student of Alinsky’s radical tactics – to pen a letter of
recommendation for him when he applied to Harvard Law School. Under the
tutelage of McKnight and other hardcore students of Alinsky, Obama said
he got the “best education I ever had, better than anything I got at
Harvard Law School.”
In a letter to the editor of the Boston Globe, Alinsky’s son praised Obama for stirring up the masses at the Democratic National Convention “Saul Alinsky style,” saying, “Obama learned his lesson well.”
The letter signed L. David Alinsky closed by saying, “I am proud to
see that my father’s model for organizing is being applied
successfully.”

WHO IS SAUL ALINSKY ???

Obama's Radical Revolution:Its Alinsky Root and Global Vision

"Radicalism
is a cause whose utopian agendas result in an ethic where the ends
outweigh and ultimately justify any means. Like the Salvationist
agendas of jihad, the Left's apocalyptic goal of ‘social justice' is the
equivalent of an earthly redemption. A planet saved, a world without
poverty, racism, inequality, or war - what means would not be justified
to achieve such millennial ends?" - David Horowitz, former 60s Radical -- Unholy Alliance; p. 127

Saul Alinsky was the father of community organizing. Before Alinsky devised his diabolical plan to bring the international socialist revolution to America -- working within
the very liberal and free system upon which the U.S. was founded -- he
was an older fellow traveler and advisor to student radicals of the
1960s.

Alinsky
was a sort of father figure, to whom many radicals turned in the
aftermath of the infamous DNC Convention of 1968 in Chicago. His
advice?

"Do
one of three things. One, go find a wailing wall and feel sorry for
yourselves. Two, go psycho and start bombing -- but this will only
swing people to the right. Three, learn a lesson. Go home, organize,
build power and at the next convention, you be the delegates." (emphasis in original) - Saul Alinsky; Rules for Radicals; p. xxiii

Calm down. Forget "burning the system down." Organize. Organize. Organize. Work within the system. Become the delegates.

To further empower his advice to the young militants, Alinsky quoted the radicals' hero, Lenin:

"Power comes out of the barrel of a gun! is
an absurd rallying cry when the other side has all the guns. Lenin was
a pragmatist; when he returned to what was then Petrograd from exile,
he said that the Bolsheviks stood for getting power through the ballot
but would reconsider after they got the guns. Militant mouthings?
Spouting quotes from Mao, Castro, and Che Guevara, which are as germane
to our highly technological, computerized, cybernetic, nuclear-powered,
mass media society as a stagecoach on a jet runway at Kennedy airport?" - Saul Alinsky; Rules for Radicals; p. xxi

At
the time, however, some of the young radicals were still too filled
with rage to stop burning and bombing. These fiery revolutionaries
continued to wreak havoc on college campuses and in American cities.
But the end of the Vietnam War brought a welcome sigh of relief to
greater America.

It was time for the radicals to change tactics, and follow Alinsky's advice. They remained convinced of their destiny to be the ones
to bring the U.S.A. into the fold of the international socialist
collective. They began to organize, go to law school, run for public
office, whittle away at traditional American institutions, and in all
ways prepare for "The One," their closer.

Enter Barack Obama

Obama
was raised on the mother's milk of socialism. Both his parents were
fellow travelers, who met at the height of the Cold War in a Russian
language class at the University of Hawaii. Obama's grandfather was a
close friend of Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis, sending
young Barry (as he was then known) to him for mentoring, despite (or in
ignorance of ) Davis being a pedophile.
From the time he returned from 4 years in Indonesia and rejoined his
grandparents in Hawaii at the age of 10, he was taken often to be with
Frank Marshall Davis.

In Obama's book, Dreams from My Father,
there is a strange revelation, perhaps intended as a signal of Davis'
stamp on Obama's socialist creds. Obama makes this odd observation:

"The
visits to his (Davis') house always left me feeling vaguely
uncomfortable, though, as if I were witnessing some complicated,
unspoken transaction between the two men, a transaction I couldn't fully
understand."

Dedicating
the young Obama to the elder socialist mentor for the collective cause,
perhaps? One hopes there were conditions protecting the ten year old
from worse than indoctrination, in this "transaction."

Obama
did everything Alinsky prescribed. He went to Chicago, home of Alinsky
and the place where Davis had worked for the communist revolution.
Obama trained at the Industrial Areas Foundation, an Alinsky training institute. He organized in Chicago and did voter registration and training for ACORN. He went to law school. He built political alliances. He kept a tight lock on his records and his past.

As
for Judeo/Christian morals. Forget it. Alinsky trained his radicals
in the spirit of no-holds-barred methods. In Alinsky's mind, the
American power structure was evil to its core and justified any means
necessary to change the "world as it is" into the "world as it should
be." Both Barack and Michelle Obama include these Alinsky code words in
their speeches, and we should not mistake their meaning. No means are
out of bounds.

Many
of these radical revolutionaries have already bombed and burned.
Lying, cheating and stealing are just more par for their revolutionary
course.

Alinsky's tenth rule of the ethics of means: "You do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments."

The Same Beast Clad in Moral Garments

As Peter Collier and David Horowitz so clearly described in their book, Destructive Generation,
the international collective hasn't changed its objectives. It merely
changes tactics to adapt to changing times and national mood.

"Like
the slowly metamorphosing monster of a horror film, the Left has
actually been recreating itself during its apparent dormancy since the
end of the Sixties, succeeding so well that now it has reappeared
stronger than ever. If there is a cyclical dynamic at work in this
rebirth, it has less to do with the laws of history than with the laws
of Leftism, which since 1917 has alternated between styles of militant
extremism and ‘popular front' moderation. The current revival will not
bring a revolutionary army into the streets, as in the Sixties. It will
involve an offensive of ‘progressivism' whose targets are the
Democratic Party, the church, the universities, and various liberal
institutions." - Destructive Generation; p. 218

This
strategy is straight from the Alinsky handbook: "Tactics, like
organization, like life, require that you move with the action." Adapt. Adapt. Adapt. And "let nothing get you off your target."

When one of the surviving inner circle of 60s radicals, Tom Hayden, endorsed
the Obama movement last year on the Huffington Post, he signaled to the
vast array of socialist political activists, not only in America, but
around the world, that Barack Obama is that "One."

"Many
ordinary Americans will take a transformative step down the long road
to the Rainbow Covenant if Obama wins. For at least a brief moment,
people around the world -- from the shantytowns to the sweatshops, even
to the restless rich of the Sixties generation -- will look up from the
treadmills of their shrunken lives to the possibilities of what life
still might be. Environmental justice and global economic hope would
dawn as possibilities."

When
Barack Obama made his world tour this summer, he introduced himself in
Berlin as a "fellow citizen of the world." Americans should make no
mistake; he wasn't kidding. As Pope Benedict (writing then as Joseph
Cardinal Ratzinger) also warned in his 2003 book, Truth and Tolerance, the international Marxist dream did not die with the fall of the USSR:

"The
collapse of realist socialism in the East European states has not quite
laid aside all such hopes, and here and there they still subsist,
silently awaiting some new form."

Even
though the Soviet system fell and its Marxist "utopia" was clearly
revealed as the antithesis of the promise to bring liberation and light
to the world, the hope lives on and thrives within the heart of Obama and his followers, and the plan is a global one.

The Informal Alliance between Socialists and Islamic Radicals

In his 2004 book, Unholy Alliance,
former 60s radical David Horowitz defines the reasons underlying the
left's rationale in dealing with the radical Islamic terrorists and
their national sponsors. Leftists in the Western world, explains
Horowitz, are not bothered by the religious dimension of the Islamic
fundamentalists. Secular leftists rationalize this religious pathology,
"believing that religion itself is merely an expression of real-world
misery, for which capitalist property is ultimately responsible."

According
to Horowitz, leftists maintain an unwavering faith in universal
rationality that tells them "even people who blow themselves and little
children up in the expectation of a place in heaven, and seventy-two
virgins besides, must ultimately be inspired by real-world grievances."

Horowitz
goes even further and defines the over-arching connection between
Islamic fundamentalists and their secular socialist enablers, striking
the heart of the matter for both: faith. Underlying both the
goal of a worldwide Islamic caliphate and the international socialists'
dream are their "common utopian expectations."

Horowitz explains the commonality thusly:

"The
Greek scientist Archimedes said, ‘Give me a lever and a place to stand
and I will move the world.' This is an archetype of the radical
outlook, both secular and religious, which believes it has identified an
institution and an agency that will move the world. The radical
Islamist believes that by conquering nations and instituting Sharia, he
can redeem the world for Allah. The socialist's faith is in using state
power and violent means to eliminate private property and thereby usher
in the millennium."

Obama's one piece of signature legislation in the Senate is the Global Poverty Act, aimed at curing what socialists deem as the root cause of all violence and war -- poverty.

In
this belief, Obama has high-powered company. He is joined by a cabal
of international socialists, especially his biggest-moneyed backer, George Soros. Soros himself backs a global tax
on wealthy countries, especially the United States. And Soros, like
Obama, believes that the Global War on Terror is ill-intentioned and
based on the desire of conservatives to build lasting American hegemony.

The
current economic meltdown, coupled with the well-laid foundation of
socialist radicals throughout this Country, now threaten to bring
America closer than we've ever been to joining the international
collective. And Barack Obama has demonstrated that he will do anything
-- anything -- it takes to be The One to close their long-envisioned revolutionary deal.

SO IS CHRIS MATHEWS A NEWS MAN ?? HELL NO ... HE IS A PROPAGANDIST FOR THE RADICAL LEFT.

ABOUT THIS BLOG

I AM A FEROCIOUS CONSERVATIVE
CONSERVATIVE RIGHT WINGER UNDERGROUND... IN EXILE IN AMERICA !
I AM AN UNRELENTING FEROCIOUS CONSERVATIVE:
Ferocious = (fə-rō'shəs) “Marked by unrelenting intensity; to the extreme”
Conservative = (kən-sûr'və-tĭz'əm) “A political philosophy or attitude emphasizing respect for traditional institutions and distrust of government activism”
My page is a place for Unrelenting Ferocious Activist Conservatives across our country to gather and discuss and plan our next moves. I am tired of sitting around and playing “nice” while the Progressive Liberals have spent the last 50 years attacking and denigrating our values and our beliefs while our side sits around and tries real hard to be accommodating and “Nice”! (Political Correctness!) NO MORE!!
AS AN UNRELENTING FEROCIOUS CONSERVATIVES. I WILL ATTACK BACK!