I'd probably fall under the second.
I have a strong, what I believe to be rational, belief in God. This is, in most respects, a tripart Christian God. I was raised Catholic but I now consider myself to be non-denominational Christian. While I have nothing against the Catholic Church, at all, I think that I would be cheating Catholicism to call myself Catholic when I rarely follow any of the morals and virtues that the Church puts forth. I believe in the Assumption of Mary, the Emaculate Conception, Transubstantiation, and most *heavy* points of the Catholic Church, but have trouble with some others. I have a profound respect for Catholicism and often times defend Christianity from Catholic perspectives; and defend Catholicism, even though I am not wholely Catholic.

D but also partially C...
i do not believe IN formal religions when you take them word for word.. but i do believe they are all based off custom stories that symbolize the same "alternate existances" that i believe in.

Between E and F. I am atheistic in the sense that no god exists until proven, but agnostic in the sense that I can't disprove one either should I try (not that the burden of proof would lie on me anyway - it is up to the believers to prove their theories, not me to debunk them).

That's a question of frame of reference. In my opinion, anyone who makes an assertion has to prove it. If you're stating no God exists, you must prove it. If you're stating God or gods exist, you must prove it.

That's a question of frame of reference. In my opinion, anyone who makes an assertion has to prove it. If you're stating no God exists, you must prove it. If you're stating God or gods exist, you must prove it.