If this is your first visit be sure to check out the FAQ. You have to REGISTER before you can post. To start viewing threads, select the forum that you want to visit from the list below.NOTICE: YOUR ACCESS HAS BEEN LIMITED UNTIL YOU REGISTER!

In order to ensure your registration and verification goes smoothly and quickly you should edit your user profile and add some content that verifies your not a robot. Add an avatar or profile image, add some location information, setup your signature, send the admin a quick private message, etc. You can make these changes by clicking on "Settings" in the top right corner of the site. Once inside your personal settings control panel, you can click on edit profile or any of the other options to begin your customizations.

Doing this will help the forum moderators verify your registration and allow you access to the entire forum.If you refuse to do this or take steps to verify your humanity, there is a very good chance your account will be deleted instead of verified.Users that look suspicious or have suspicious email addresses and users with no profile information will be deleted without warning.

Whenever I see footage of a single mum with a hungry kid or kids she iz over 100kg.
Me myself I don't hav any breaky, I hav a banana for lunch. And I am happy with spuds for dinner.
No candy, no soda, no cookys.

But I think my main point anyhow woz that if u had zero population growth then there would be zero need for new subdivisions new schools new houses.
The next step would be one kid per family -- in eech generation the number of houses owned by familys would double -- 1, 2, 4, 8 etc, without limit.
mac.

Whenever I see footage of a single mum with a hungry kid or kids she iz over 100kg.
Me myself I don't hav any breaky, I hav a banana for lunch. And I am happy with spuds for dinner.
No candy, no soda, no cookys.

But I think my main point anyhow woz that if u had zero population growth then there would be zero need for new subdivisions new schools new houses.
The next step would be one kid per family -- in eech generation the number of houses owned by familys would double -- 1, 2, 4, 8 etc, without limit.
mac.

"Whenever I see footage of a single mum with a hungry kid or kids she iz over 100kg."

Misogynistic as well?

There are just as many obese men in the world as women.

Zero Population Growth wouldn't be the issue that it is if not for organized religion.

The majority of children born, are not planned, and are not wanted.

Encouraging over population has always been pushed by MEN! Not by WOMEN! MEN who sought to exploit the umbers for their own gain, mostly for their armies and wars, particularly religious wars.

As long as people continue to embrace uinproven facts as their way of life, things will continue to decline.

Our Founders knew this, and hence, we were supposed to keep government, separate from religion.

"Unless the separation is perfect and complete, neither will survive."

"Whenever I see footage of a single mum with a hungry kid or kids she iz over 100kg."
Misogynistic as well?
There are just as many obese men in the world as women.
Zero Population Growth wouldn't be the issue that it is if not for organized religion.
The majority of children born, are not planned, and are not wanted.
Encouraging over population has always been pushed by MEN! Not by WOMEN! MEN who sought to exploit the umbers for their own gain, mostly for their armies and wars, particularly religious wars. As long as people continue to embrace uinproven facts as their way of life, things will continue to decline. Our Founders knew this, and hence, we were supposed to keep government, separate from religion. "Unless the separation is perfect and complete, neither will survive." Thomas Jefferson

Gayle -- I see myself az philogynistic.
For sure talking about women this and that and ignoring men this and that iz a form of prejudice, and this sort of prejudice appears to kum within the definition of misogyny nowadays.

But, in my defense, i did say that I woz referring to footage that I had seen, and if that footage woz indeed only of single-mums then it iz the footage that iz misogynistic, and i am merely a messenger.
mac.

Misogyny
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Misogyny /mɪˈsɒdʒɪni/ is the hatred or dislike of women or girls. Misogyny can be manifested in numerous ways, including sexual discrimination, denigration of women, violence against women, and sexual objectification of women.[1][2] Misogyny has been characterised as a prominent feature of the mythologies of the ancient world as well as of various religions. In addition, many influential Western philosophers have been described as misogynistic.[1] The counterpart of misogyny is misandry, the hatred or dislike of men; the antonym of misogyny is philogyny, the love or fondness of women.
Definitions
According to sociologist Allan G. Johnson, "misogyny is a cultural attitude of hatred for females because they are female." Johnson argues that:

Misogyny .... is a central part of sexist prejudice and ideology and, as such, is an important basis for the oppression of females in male-dominated societies. Misogyny is manifested in many different ways, from jokes to pornography to violence to the self-contempt women may be taught to feel toward their own bodies.[3]

Sociologist Michael Flood, at the University of Wollongong, defines misogyny as the hatred of women, and notes:
Though most common in men, misogyny also exists in and is practiced by women against other women or even themselves. Misogyny functions as an ideology or belief system that has accompanied patriarchal, or male-dominated societies for thousands of years and continues to place women in subordinate positions with limited access to power and decision making. [...] Aristotle contended that women exist as natural deformities or imperfect males [...] Ever since, women in Western cultures have internalised their role as societal scapegoats, influenced in the twenty-first century by multimedia objectification of women with its culturally sanctioned self-loathing and fixations on plastic surgery, anorexia and bulimia.[4]

Dictionaries define misogyny as "hatred of women"[5][6][7] and as "hatred, dislike, or mistrust of women".[8] In 2012, primarily in response to events occurring in the Australian Parliament, the Macquarie Dictionary (which documents Australian English and New Zealand English) expanded the definition to include not only hatred of women but also "entrenched prejudices against women".[9]

Gayle -- I see myself az philogynistic.
For sure talking about women this and that and ignoring men this and that iz a form of prejudice, and this sort of prejudice appears to kum within the definition of misogyny nowadays.

But, in my defense, i did say that I woz referring to footage that I had seen, and if that footage woz indeed only of single-mums then it iz the footage that iz misogynistic, and i am merely a messenger.
mac.

No defense for you, friend. You wrote it. You could just as easily have used your head and realized that children have fat, even obese, Fathers as often as are their mothers. Are you now trying to say you have never seen any childrern walking along with fat fathers?

Gayle -- Yes, but i woz specifically talking bout theusofa, so here i kan only rely on footage (not what i see around me).
But even re what i see around me (in ozz), mums and dads don't hav SINGLE on their teeshirts. Footage fixes that.

I see wiki haz women (in theusofa) only slightly worse than men re obesity (i thort that women would be way worse).
But i koodnt find a breakdown for single mums and dads. But overall the figure (about 32% of adults) iz terrible.
Ozz iz No2 in the world last i heard (terrible).
mac.

By the way, diet science iz slowly kumming round to what mac allways says. On the news last week the latest fake diet science to fall iz the badmouthing of saturated fats. We shood hav lots of saturated fat in our diets.
mac.

Gayle -- Yes, but i woz specifically talking bout theusofa, so here i kan only rely on footage (not what i see around me).
But even re what i see around me (in ozz), mums and dads don't hav SINGLE on their teeshirts. Footage fixes that.

I see wiki haz women (in theusofa) only slightly worse than men re obesity (i thort that women would be way worse).
But i koodnt find a breakdown for single mums and dads. But overall the figure (about 32% of adults) iz terrible.
Ozz iz No2 in the world last i heard (terrible).
mac.

By the way, diet science iz slowly kumming round to what mac allways says. On the news last week the latest fake diet science to fall iz the badmouthing of saturated fats. We shood hav lots of saturated fat in our diets.
mac.