Neural Synchronization and Cryptography

Neuronale Synchronisation und Kryptographie

Neural networks can synchronize by learning from each other. For that purpose they receive common inputs and exchange their outputs. Adjusting discrete weights according to a suitable learning rule then leads to full synchronization in a finite number of steps. It is also possible to train additional neural networks by using the inputs and outputs generated during this process as examples. Several algorithms for both tasks are presented and analyzed. In the case of Tree Parity Machines the dynamics of both processes is driven by attractive and Neural networks can synchronize by learning from each other. For that purpose they receive common inputs and exchange their outputs. Adjusting discrete weights according to a suitable learning rule then leads to full synchronization in a finite number of steps. It is also possible to train additional neural networks by using the inputs and outputs generated during this process as examples. Several algorithms for both tasks are presented and analyzed. In the case of Tree Parity Machines the dynamics of both processes is driven by attractive and repulsive stochastic forces. Thus it can be described well by models based on random walks, which represent either the weights themselves or order parameters of their distribution. However, synchronization is much faster than learning. This effect is caused by different frequencies of attractive and repulsive steps, as only neural networks interacting with each other are able to skip unsuitable inputs. Scaling laws for the number of steps needed for full synchronization and successful learning are derived using analytical models. They indicate that the difference between both processes can be controlled by changing the synaptic depth. In the case of bidirectional interaction the synchronization time increases proportional to the square of this parameter, but it grows exponentially, if information is transmitted in one direction only. Because of this effect neural synchronization can be used to construct a cryptographic key-exchange protocol. Here the partners benefit from mutual interaction, so that a passive attacker is usually unable to learn the generated key in time. The success probabilities of different attack methods are determined by numerical simulations and scaling laws are derived from the data. If the synaptic depth is increased, the complexity of a successful attack grows exponentially, but there is only a polynomial increase of the effort needed to generate a key. Therefore the partners can reach any desired level of security by choosing suitable parameters. In addition, the entropy of the weight distribution is used to determine the effective number of keys, which are generated in different runs of the key-exchange protocol using the same sequence of input vectors. If the common random inputs are replaced with queries, synchronization is possible, too. However, the partners have more control over the difficulty of the key exchange and the attacks. Therefore they can improve the security without increasing the average synchronization time.…

89.70.-a Information and communication theory (for telecommunications, see 84.40.Ua; for optical communications, see 42.79.Sz; for quantum information, see 03.67.-a; for applications to neuroscience, see 87.19.lo)