The download link offered by the PSI in your troubleshoot report takes you to the Safari website and offers you the download of version 5.1 . The downloaded installer .exe file shows as version 5.34.50.0 .

So the "metadata confusion" as discussed by the Secunia official (as linked by Mogs) would seem to continue , but at least the download file seems correct .

You may wish to advise Secunia direct at support@secunia.com if the PSI display continues to state/recommend 5.0.6 as opposed to 5.1 - (I am unable to see this , so cannot comment) - if they do not pick up this thread , here , tomorrow (CET) .

Hi Anthony ! Quite well thanks...need a bit more physical exercise....wear the rubber down on my shoes more often ! Glad you're in good spirits.
Thanks for enlarging 'pon the Safari discrepancies....regards/best wishes......

I have just noticed in SA45325 that both versions 5.0.6 and 5.1 are said to patch/update the vulnerability . By Secunia detection rules , the PSI will continue to suggest that 5.0.6 is the "first" version to deal with the problem and assume that 5.1 is a bug/eye candy fix . This will continue as long as 5.0.6 is supported and is fully patched , even/especially if 5.1 is a platform change and even if the link goes to 5.1 , the PSI may well try to offer 5.0.6 . but that will be conditional on the Safari website . Confusing , but there you go :))

The link given by Secunia PSI in your report to update takes U to the download page.

What that download link did.

1. Installed version 5.34.50 for Safari & version 2.1.3.127 for the updater.

2. A check of the Browser "about" is consistent with that download in revealing version 5.1 (7534.50).

3. A full PSI rescan revealed that version 5.34.50 is patched.

4. Checking the Secure Browsing Section reveals there is an outstanding vulnerability under SA40110.

This is consistent once again in that you, as a user, have done all U can to patch Safari hence it shows as patched in the main window & vulnerable in the Secure Browsing Section (for use by advanced users)

Thank you all for the feedback. Seems that the links, as stated, are correct for the 5.1 update and that PSI still offers the earlier, lower, version number in its recommendation. At least MY confusion is now cleared up even if PSI is still confused.