Menu

We will allow more people to live in areas that are already developed, which will slow construction over wilderness and farmland.

The current zoning code limits population density by restricting the number of dwellings that can be built on each lot of land. A dwelling is an apartment or house for one “family,” which is usually defined as four unrelated people. Some zones only allow one dwelling per lot. There are minimum lot sizes, which means that there is a maximum number of dwellings that can be built on each acre. For example, the R1A zone allows only one dwelling per lot, and lots must be at least 20,000 square ft. This means there can only be eight unrelated residents per acre.

Since many people want to live in Ann Arbor, and the supply of housing is limited , housing is more expensive than in nearby communities. Developers respond by building houses in nearby townships. Between 2000 and 2010, Washtenaw County’s population increased by 22,021, but Ann Arbor’s population decreased by 90.

New developments southwest of Ann Arbor from 1993-2013. Maps from U.S Geological Survey.

Advertisements for these developments emphasize how close the subdivisions are to Ann Arbor. A website for “The Ravines” states “Residents pay lower Scio Township taxes but benefit from city water & utilities and by sending their children to Ann Arbor Schools.” The same page later claims: “Located in popular Ann Arbor and offers great access to the expressway to get to Detroit or beyond quickly. A hop skip and a jump away is Zingerman’s Deli, Kerrytown, Kerrytown Farmers Market, U of M campus, Medical Center and University of Michigan football games.

Our zoning plan will allow smaller lots, and more dwellings on each. The only limit on the number of people per dwelling will come from safety rules in the state construction codes which prevent fire hazards and other dangers. More people will be able to live in areas which are already developed, which will slow construction over wilderness and farm land.

We will reduce travel distances by allowing more people to live near businesses. This will reduce air pollution from vehicles.

Our zoning plan will allow a mixture of land uses in every part of the city with rules to prevent noise and other nuisances. Apartments, houses, and businesses will be permitted in the same area. This will make it easier to reach destinations on foot. It will also be easier to run busses and other forms of public transportation, because more people will be allowed to live close to transit stops. Research shows that increased population density is linked to decreased car use and more generally, decreased transport energy use.

Even though our zoning plan will likely decrease car use and pollution, it may make remaining car travel more convenient. If population density increases, traffic density will increase, but destinations will be closer together. Research suggests that having destinations closer together speeds travel more than traffic density slows it.

Our zoning plan will also reduce traffic congestion and air pollution by abolishing off-street parking minimums. Currently, when someone builds a new structure, they must include a minimum number of parking spaces. The number depends on the size of the structure and the type of land use. These minimums exist so that people who drive to the new structure do not take up parking spaces on the street, but there are studied negative consequences. Houses and stores are spread apart by parking lots, which makes walking and public transport difficult. Commercial and residential space is more expensive, because every new development site is partially filled by parking spaces. Traffic congestion increases, because more people drive when they can park for free.

Reforming the zoning code to allow compact arrangements will slow urban sprawl, reduce vehicle use, and make all forms of transportation more convenient. Our zoning plan does this while better protecting residents from nuisances.

Traditional zoning is supposed to separate incompatible land uses to prevent nuisances.

In theory, zoning provides isolated spaces for irritating land uses like noisy factories, which would otherwise bother nearby people.

The problem is that the zones for irritating land uses have to border the other zones somewhere. A nuisance that is allowed in an industrial zone can bother people in a nearby residential zone. A small town with a few zones might use a river or lake as a barrier between districts, but in Ann Arbor today, land uses are not separate. Industrial zones touch residential zones all over the map.

The light purple is M1 Limited Industrial. The dark purple is M2 Heavy Industrial. The yellow shapes are residential zones. The pink shapes are commercial zones, which allow stores and houses. The circle contains Lotus Engineering and houses across the street.

Lotus Engineering at 1254 North Main Street in the M2 Heavy Industrial zone.

A house across the street in the R4A residential zone

Performance standards, not zoning, prevent severe nuisances.

So what is stopping industrial uses from sending dust and noise to nearby houses? City laws like the Noise Ordinance and Air Quality Control Ordinance. These performance standards forbid dangers and serious nuisances in all zones, but they do not solve the problem of how to isolate moderately disturbing land uses. Some people prefer areas that have strict rules for nuisances like noisy truck deliveries and loud businesses open late, but other people prefer areas with more lenient rules. Separating the areas is currently not possible, because people in the lenient zones can bother people in nearby restrictive zones. It is also not possible to ban moderate irritations from the whole city. It is illegal for cities in Michigan to completely exclude needed land uses, so necessary irritations must go somewhere.

Currently, residents can only avoid moderate nuisances if they push harms away from themselves.

The D1 district borders the R4C downtown near Huron and Division. The D1 allows 150-180 ft. buildings. The R4C allows 30 ft. buildings. This year, city council approved a 140 ft. building at Huron and Division in the D1 zone.

The red is D1 Downtown. The dark yellow is R4 Residential. The circle contains a planned 14 story building.

Many nearby residents are angry, and one of their complaints is that shade from tall buildings is a nuisance. However, tall buildings create space for people to live and work, so city council is not willing to ban all structures taller than 30 ft. The D2 district, which allows 60 ft. buildings, is supposed to solve this problem by providing a buffer between the D1 and other zones. However, the D2 district does not fully circle the D1, and even if it is expanded, there are people just outside the D2 who feel that a six story building is a nuisance. In 2010, neighbors successfully opposed The Moravian, a six story apartment built near the border of the D2. Wherever there is a line between two zones that allow different degrees of harm, people in the restrictive zone will have to live with the higher degree of harm. This buffering problem will reoccur as long as traditional zoning exists.

City council recognizes that each district’s zoning rules affect people in nearby zones, and they invite people to give their opinions on each zoning change. When people help make zoning rules for their neighbors, they sometimes act in their own self interest. Some residents would rather have fewer people and less traffic in their neighborhood, even if they know that people must live somewhere. Neighbors argue for density restrictions that make housing more expensive, and force people to live outside the city, often in subdivisions built over fields and forests. Traditional zoning creates new problems without protecting residents from nuisances.

Our zoning plan isolates moderate irritations.

Instead of regulating what irritations can be sent from properties in each zone, our plan regulates what irritations can be received by properties in each zone. This means that no one can disturb a property in a restricted area of the city, even if the disruption is coming from a property in a less restrictive zone.

The height limit for a building in an unrestricted zone depends on its distance from a restricted zone. For example, the rule could be:

“The maximum height of a structure is either 35 feet, or one half the distance between the structure and the nearest property in a restricted zone–whichever value is greater.”

This plan allows tall buildings in the center of downtown, but not the edges. No building casts a shadow on a restricted property until roughly one hour before sunset, when shadows are about twice as long as buildings. Residents are better protected, and there is more space for stores and apartments. Similar controls for noise and other irritations protect people in restricted zones from nuisances, regardless of nearby zoning changes.

The new zones are arranged to protect areas that the current zoning code intends to protect. The Restricted Mixed Use zone covers areas currently zoned residential. The Mixed Use Zone covers commercial and industrial areas.

Property owners may request a rezoning from Restricted Mixed Use to Mixed Use at any time. City council and the planning commission do not have to debate each zoning change, because Restricted Mixed Use properties are protected regardless of nearby zoning. For example, if a developer purchases a large Restricted Mixed Use tract and rezones it to be Mixed Use, the developer can build a tall building in the center of his property, but only a 35 foot building at the edge of his property. Before building, the developer must pay impact fees for water and sewer expansions that are necessary because of the development, but the rezoning can be immediate.

The plan will better protect residents and create more space for dwellings and businesses. Housing and commercial space will be more affordable, fewer people will build over farms and fields, and land use changes will occur with fewer expensive and unpleasant disputes.

Each landlord charges the highest price that a tenant is willing to pay. The result is that at current prices, there are about as many tenants looking for housing as there are available bedrooms.

If there were more tenants than available bedrooms, landlords would raise their rent. Landlords know that if many people are competing for a room, there will probably still be a few people who want the room at a higher price.

If there were more bedrooms than tenants, landlords would lower prices to attract tenants from other landlords. Landlords do not want to risk having empty rooms. When there is a surplus of housing, prices fall until enough people move in from other areas and there is no longer a surplus.

When rent is high, people try to build houses and rent them. When new houses are built, there are empty rooms, and landlords have to lower their rent or risk vacancies. If there is space for construction, people keep building rental properties until there are so many bedrooms that renting out a house is less profitable than another investments. When there is enough space for new houses, the cost of housing is close to the cost of construction and maintenance.

The current zoning code limits the amount of space available for new housing in Ann Arbor. People build houses over farmland in nearby townships, but suburban subdivisions are not a perfect substitute for neighborhoods in Ann Arbor. Tenants are willing to pay more to live near stores and university buildings, so prices remain high. Mixed use zoning will create space for new housing within the city by allowing more bedrooms in each house and more houses on each parcel of land. Landlords will lower rent to avoid vacancies.

Mixed use zoning will allow the supply of housing to increase.

This house is in the R1D zone. It has four bedrooms and a finished attic. On Craigslist, the rent is $2200 a month. No more than four unrelated people can live in it. The current zoning code prohibits five or more people from living in R1 dwellings, unless they are a family. If city council adopted the Mixed Use Party zoning plan, more than four unrelated people could live in the house. The only limit on people would come from the state building code, which prohibits tiny rooms and other fire hazards. Some people could choose to share a room, and if the finished attic met building code standards, another person could live upstairs.

If more people were allowed in the house, the rent could be split up further, so that each person paid less. Forbidding a fifth resident in a house with space for more than four people is wasteful.

The current zoning code also limits the number of dwellings on each lot. A dwelling is an apartment or house designed for one group of people. In the R1 zone, there can only be one dwelling on each lot. In some zones, people cannot divide large lots into smaller pieces. The house shown above is on a lot that is 7,405 square ft. In many parts of the city, a lot that size is illegal. For example, in the R1A zone, lots must be 20,000 square ft. or larger. Mixed use zoning will allow smaller lots, and more dwellings on each. The only limit on dwellings will be safety rules from the state building code.

Mixed use zoning will let people choose from a variety of neighborhoods.

Despite the advantages of sharing space, some people prefer to live in an area where only one family is allowed in each house. Luckily for them, there are many homeowners associations in Ann Arbor that forbid apartments altogether. If someone does not want to live near renters, students, poor people, or some other group, that person can create or join a homeowners association that excludes everything but large single family houses. Home owners associations use deed restrictions that are beyond the city’s control. Mixed use zoning will allow people to choose between areas with many land uses, and places where only one use is allowed. The zoning code will no longer resemble an exclusionary homeowners association for the whole city. Instead it will be a simple plan to regulate harms like noise, odor, and building shade.

America does not uniformly face a housing affordability crisis. In the majority of places, land costs are low (or at least reasonable) and housing prices are close to (or below) the costs of new construction. In the places where housing is quite expensive, zoning restrictions appear to have created these high prices.

One implication of this analysis is that the affordable housing debate should be broadened to encompass zoning reform, not just public or subsidized construction programs. (Glaeser, 6)

Limiting the development of inexpensive housing in affluent neighborhoods and jurisdictions fuels economic and racial segregation and contributes to significant differences in school performance across the metropolitan landscape. (Rothwell, 1)

The cooperative Robert Owen House has 4967 square ft. of floor area, making it a non-conforming use. It cannot be expanded or structurally altered to prolong the life of the building. If the structure is destroyed, it cannot be rebuilt. Property Information

Co-ops that are too small to conform to the zoning code.

Black Elk 4269 sqft

Debs 3390 sqft

King 3133 sqft

Lester 3321 sqft

Linder 3684 sqft

Michigan and Minnies 3548, 3634 sqft

Half of Luther 4951 sqft

Osterweil 2500 sqft

Owen 4967 sqft

Ruths 2597 sqft

Vail 4346 sqft

Fraternities that are too small to conform to the zoning code.

Delta Chi 4990 sqft

Zeta Psi 4068 sqft

Tau Kappa Epsilon 2112 sqft

Kappa Sigma 4453 sqft

Lambda Phi Epsilon 3756 sqft

Even larger fraternities and sororities may be nonconforming because each property must have 350 square ft of lot area per inhabitant.

The city has extra rules for Co-ops, Sororities, and Fraternities that do not apply to other residents. We will abolish these rules.

The City Code of Ann Arbor states:

Student Cooperatives, Fraternities, and Sororities are not allowed in the R1, R2A, and R3 districts (A large part of Ann Arbor is covered by these three districts). 5:10.4zoning map

For each house:

1. A resident manager shall be employed or appointed. For purposes of this section, a resident manager is one who lives on-site, serving in a regular or full-time capacity. 5:10.4

2. A minimum lot size of 8,500 square feet subject to a minimum of 350 square feet of lot area per occupant shall be provided. 5:10.4

3. The Floor area of the Structure shall exceed 5,000 square feet of usable Floor area. Single or two-family Structures containing 5,000 square feet or less on April 9, 1984 may not be converted to fraternities, sororities or student cooperatives. 5:10.4

4. A fraternity, sorority or student cooperative adjacent to a single or two-family Structure shall have a hedge, berm, Fence or wall, forming a continuous screen at least 6 feet high between it and the residential units, to be located adjacent to the Lot Line from the front of the Structure to the rear property line, except in required Front Open Space and where restricted by other ordinance provisions. Screening which continues into the required shall be consistent with section 5.26 Fences. 5:10.4

6. Chickens are only allowed in single family and two family homes. 9:42 (3)

These restrictions prevent co-ops, fraternities, and sororities from using medium and small buildings. For example, Robert Owen house has 4967 square feet of floor area and would not be allowed today. Coops like Vale are even smaller. Also, the parking requirements take up space that could be used for more rooms or other purposes.

Because the city can enforce noise and safety rules without restricting group housing, the above restrictions are unnecessary, and the Mixed Use Party will abolish them.