Loomer publishes her material on her website and YouTube channel. That actually qualifies her by definition as a legitimate journalist.

Loomer has developed a confrontational style where she “Loomeres” those Leftist political newsmakers. Loomer demands answers as a form of unbridled advocacy and activism. That activity has gotten her ejected from book signings and numerous political events.

Crashing the gates and fences of Gavin Newsome and Nancy Pelosi that both claimed a border wall was immoral captured police attention. Loomer risked arrest and prosecution to demonstrate their stunning personal hypocrisy.

Loomer has run afoul of Muslims and their Leftist sympathizers, calling them out on their bias and violence against Jews and Gays. That activity has gotten her banned from Uber, Lyft, Twitter, Pay Pal and Chase Bank.

Loomer went to Congress and challenged Twitter CEO, Jack Dorsey on his ambiguousness on his website’s shifting censorship policies. When Twitter banned Loomer she handcuffed herself to their NYC front door.

Can Loomer be simultaneously both an advocate and a journalist?She crosses the line when she actually becomes the story rather than just covering the news. There is an obvious conflict here. But it’s not slowed down this firebrand one bit.

Loomer obtained press credentials to attend and cover CPAC. Her credentials were revoked and confiscated after she reportedly Loomered CNN reporter, Oliver Darcy over his biased coverage of President Trump.

Loomer is currently championing a campaign of defending the First Amendment Rights Of Conservatives.

Conservatives are under constant Leftist censorship attacks. Simply wearing a red Trump hat near Liberals has been an excuse for Leftist violence.

We need more Laura Loomers or we will have no free speech rights. Like her message or not, if we refuse to protect Loomer, who then will protect us?