\documentclass[memo,nocolor]{j3}
\renewcommand{\hdate}{3 March 2004}
\renewcommand{\vers}{J3/04-228r1}
\usepackage{lineno}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{xr}
\externaldocument{007}
\input pdftest
\begin{document}
\vspace{-10pt}
\begin{tabbing}
Subject: \hspace*{0.25in}\=Problems with CHAR and LEN in the FCD\\
From: \>Van Snyder\\
\end{tabbing}
\pagewiselinenumbers
\leftlinenumbers
\linenumbers*
\section{Problem with CHAR}
The bullet on CHAR in subclause 13.6 was removed between 01-007r1 and
01-007r2. This appears to be a typographical error. There are no edits
in any papers for meeting 157 that address page 285, where CHAR was in
01-007r1. I also checked papers from meetings 156 and 158, and none had
edits for page 285 in 01-007r1.
\sep\mgpar{298}Editor: On page 298, 7 lines from the bottom, restore the
bullet on CHAR.
\section{Problem with intrisic functions with KIND arguments}
We added KIND arguments to several intrinsic functions, resulting in
AINT, ANINT, DINT, DNINT, IDNINT, INDEX, LEN and NINT specific functions
having KIND arguments. It does not make sense to be able to pass them as
actual arguments.
\sep\mgpar{298:16+ New\P}In those cases where the corresponding generic
function has an optional dummy argument named KIND, the specific function
omits that argument. The special meaning of the KIND argument is
fundamentally a generic concept.
\label{lastpage}
\end{document}