Sunday, March 29, 2015

HARDCORE LENR: PALLADIUM STILL SHINING BRIGHT AT ICCF-19

MOTTO

Growth is the only evidence of life. (John Henry Newman)I have continued to think about the ICCF-19 program. To err is human, it seems I missed to include two papers in he list of yesterday:A. Possibly also with technological implications:

B. The hardcore of the presentation is, as it was at all ICCFs, about the existential, understanding and development problems of the Palladium Deuterium system. Old poisoned challenge to problem solving, let's see if some breakthrough has appeared and if my Pdisaster idea was killed by facts- I hope so, even if it sounds a bit schizophrenic

1. Vittorio Violante

Heat Production and RF detection during cathodic polarization
of Palladium in O.1 MLiOD

Observations of RF Emissions and heat in
electrochemical loading experiments

14. David Knies

A Method to Control Palladium Crystallographic Texture and
Surface Morphology

15. Francesca Sarto

Morphology and electrochemical properties of
Pd-based nanostructures deposited by different thin-film techniqueObviously for commenting about these papers I have to read and study them.Breakthrough or not breakthrough, morphology and heat release connected, the actionable parameters were eventually found? Let's hope the best!

2 comments:

I note that there is a goodly number of papers covering RF emissions from the deuterium systems scheduled for the ICCF-19 conference. I believe that RF emissions is a negative sign or influence for the LENR reaction because this EMF emission robs power from the reaction and broadcasts that power to the far field. It is anagoges to a poorly timed gasoline engine that produces little useful output power and lots of unburned fuel. The deuterium reaction is prone to produce this LENR reaction pollutant because of the nuclear spin characteristic of deuterium. Deuterium is far more NMR active than hydrogen... protium (name rarely used, symbol 1H) is. The best LENR hydrogen isotope for the LENR reaction is the most NMR inactive with a zero nuclear spin.

I note that there is a goodly number of papers covering RF emissions from the deuterium systems scheduled for the ICCF-19 conference. I believe that RF emissions is a negative sign or influence for the LENR reaction because this EMF emission robs power from the reaction and broadcasts that power to the far field. It is anagoges to a poorly timed gasoline engine that produces little useful output power and lots of unburned fuel. The deuterium reaction is prone to produce this LENR reaction pollutant because of the nuclear spin characteristic of deuterium. Deuterium is far more NMR active than hydrogen... protium (name rarely used, symbol 1H) is. The best LENR hydrogen isotope for the LENR reaction is the most NMR inactive with a zero nuclear spin.