Note: Citations are based on reference standards. However, formatting rules can vary widely between applications and fields of interest or study. The specific requirements or preferences of your reviewing publisher, classroom teacher, institution or organization should be applied.

Nearby libraries

Checking...

Find more librariesLibrarian?Claim your libraryto

The arguments of the Right Honourable, the late Lord Chancellor Nottingham, : upon which he made the decree in the cause between the Honourable Charles Howard, Esq; plaintiff; Henry late Duke of Norfolk, Henry Lord Mowbrey his son, Henry Marquess of Dorchester, and Richard Marriott, Esq; defendants: wherein the several wayes and methods of limiting the trust of a term for years, are fully debated.

Reviews

Tags

Add tags for "The arguments of the Right Honourable, the late Lord Chancellor Nottingham, : upon which he made the decree in the cause between the Honourable Charles Howard, Esq; plaintiff; Henry late Duke of Norfolk, Henry Lord Mowbrey his son, Henry Marquess of Dorchester, and Richard Marriott, Esq; defendants: wherein the several wayes and methods of limiting the trust of a term for years, are fully debated.".Be the first.

The arguments of the Right Honourable, the late Lord Chancellor Nottingham, : upon which he made the decree in the cause between the Honourable Charles Howard, Esq; plaintiff; Henry late Duke of Norfolk, Henry Lord Mowbrey his son, Henry Marquess of Dorchester, and Richard Marriott, Esq; defendants: wherein the several wayes and methods of limiting the trust of a term for years, are fully debated./Heneage Finch Nottingham, Earl of; Henry Howard Norfolk, Duke of; Charles Howard; George Tatarshall; Great Britain. Court of Chancery.; City of London (England). Corporation.; England and Wales. Attorney-General.; London, Printed for George Tatarshall, esq. of Finchamsted in the County of Berks, MDCLXXXV [1685]