TomServo wrote:skimming through this...am I to understand that wh..sh is the butt plug, for starting a thread, just to ridicule another eplayan?

No, This was taken from the Fuck! thread because a moderator who probably knows a little something about fucking butt-plugs found the discussion about fucking butt-plugs in the Fuck! thread to be a hot enough topic to warrant it own Fucking thread or something like that.

We have an obligation to make space for everyone, we have no obligation to make that space pleasant.

OED, it was moved to this thread because it was drifting into something other than what the Fuck thread was intended for. Personally, I think the posts should've gone back a bit further to where it really started.

Sometimes I'm confused by what I think is really obvious. But what I think is really obvious obviously isn't obvious.

It's not what it was "intended for", it's what it's evolved into in the last 8 years- basically a place to scream. If it had stayed an active thread for 8 years about the physical act of fucking, things would have been different. It's not the first time a topic has been spun off of that thread, it won't be the last.

As for my "knowledge" of butt-plugs, sorry, just because I'm gay doesn't mean I need toys. While I'm sure you could enlighten me on their uses, I think that personally I'd rather stick to the flesh ones that come with a hot person attached and have multiple uses.

Honestly, hets have the most fucked up view of gay sexuality- I mean, I don't assume all straight couples only use the missionary position while the female looks at the ceiling waiting for it to be over. I understand that just because that's the most common way doesn't mean it's the only way...

It's a camping trip in the desert, not the redemption of the fallen world - Cryptofishist

You are over defensively using your moderator hat. A job that; in my opinion you are not able to do without losing objectivity and tact. your first move should have been to have anouther mod step in and regulate and or lock the thread. I also think you favor a passive agresive defence mechanisim most likely as a result of being a habitual victim.

In no way am I saying OEDs comment was on the up and up. But your response was by far worse. Maybe I should have used a PM or alerted another mod but that is not my job.

.......................................................................................Oh yeah, this year I was totally twerping out at the fence. ~Lonesombri

knowmad wrote:Oh buttplug!I find when gays say "het's..." it is as offending as hearing the word "fag".

I know. Why do you think I used it?

Key word you are overlooking here is "probably", Eric;)

Everyone(<mostly) already knows you're a gay or a fag or someone who likes men or whatever you prefer to be or not be called, but you know my statement also ends with "or something like that" so don't get your makeup all clumped up over a fairly accurate report of the events that transpired that brought this topic unto it's own thread in the first place.

And OF COURSE all heteros assume gay men use Fucking butt-plugs, ever seen the Gay section at the porn shop?... but then again when you look at the lezbo section it all gets so confusing...

My only question now is since this is a branch of the Fuck! thread, are we still supposed to make sure that Fuck! is still in our posts?

We have an obligation to make space for everyone, we have no obligation to make that space pleasant.

Honestly, hets have the most fucked up view of gay sexuality- I mean, I don't assume all straight couples only use the missionary position while the female looks at the ceiling waiting for it to be over. I understand that just because that's the most common way doesn't mean it's the only way...

I thought this was kind of funny and I'm a het. Not offended at all...

maryanimal wrote:OED, it was moved to this thread because it was drifting into something other than what the Fuck thread was intended for. Personally, I think the posts should've gone back a bit further to where it really started.

Sometimes I'm confused by what I think is really obvious. But what I think is really obvious obviously isn't obvious.

Honestly, hets have the most fucked up view of gay sexuality- I mean, I don't assume all straight couples only use the missionary position while the female looks at the ceiling waiting for it to be over. I understand that just because that's the most common way doesn't mean it's the only way...

I thought this was kind of funny and I'm a het. Not offended at all...

I haven't heard the term "het " before. I don't find it insulting in the least. Eric is right in saying most hets do have a skewed knowledge of what love, sex,and relationships between glbt's is. But there are some of us that know/realize that it's no different than heterosexual love, sex, and relationships.

That said, who do you think will be in the Super Bowl?

Sometimes I'm confused by what I think is really obvious. But what I think is really obvious obviously isn't obvious.

Super Who? Seriously, I haven't got a clue which teams are even in the right league for it. So I vote for the Lingerie Football League. Saw one of their games on TV, those ladies are some tough chicks, and pleasant to look at. The garters were just silly though.