History in prose

28 July, 2006

Today, I owe very much to the days of IB English, not least for allowing me to recognize the tremendous truths that can be found in the art of writing and story-telling. I had been reading Isabel Allende’s The House of the Spiritswhen I suddenly found myself wanting more, to learn in-depth about the history surrounding the violent chain of events leading up to and beyond the Chilean coup d’état of 1973. It was then that I discovered how influential an author can be in voicing his/her experiences and views to a wider audience; and it was also then that I first had the opportunity to read Darwish’s Memory for Forgetfulness.

Taking place in Beirut in the summer of 1982, Mahmoud Darwish, a Palestinian writer and poet, poignantly tells the story of his experience during the second Israeli military invasion of Lebanon and siege of Beirut in the 1980s. Switching back and forth between dream and reality, poetry and prose, past and present, Darwish relays the emptiness, the pain, and the internal struggle encountered under such extreme and dangerous conditions. This book not only captures a time that is far from forgotten in the history of Lebanon, but it also allows the reader to come close to truly understanding how it feels to be experiencing what is going on in Lebanon today.

Now, more than ever, Memory for Forgetfulness bears unparalleled relevance and insight into the conflict that is raging across the Middle East.

Below are two excerpts from the English edition translated by Ibrahim Muhawi:

The sky sinks like a sagging concrete roof. The sea approaches, changing into dry land. Sky and sea are one substance, making it hard to breathe. I switch on the radio. Nothing. Time has frozen. It sits on me, choking me. The jets pass between my fingers. They pierce my lungs. How can I reach the aroma of coffee? Am I to shrivel up and die without the aroma of coffee? I don’t want. I don’t want. Where’s my will?

It stopped there, on the other side of the street, the day we raised the call against the legend advancing on us from the south. The day human flesh clenched the muscles of its spirit and cried, “They shall not pass, and we will not leave!” Flesh engaged against metal: it won against the difficult arithemtic, and the conquerors were halted by the walls. There will be time to bury the dead. There will be time for weaponry. And there will be time to pass the time as we please, that this heroism may go on. Because now we are the masters of time.

Bread sprang from the soil and water gushed from the rocks. Their rockets dug wells for us, and the language of their killing tempted us to sing, “We will not leave!” We saw our faces on foreign screens boiling with great promise and breaking through the siege with unwavering victory signs. From now on we have nothing to lose, so long as Beirut is here and we’re here in Beirut as names for a different homeland, where meanings will find their words again in the midst of this sea and on the edge of this desert. For here, where we are, is the tent for wandering meanings and words gone astray and the orphaned light, scattered and banished from the center.

▪ ▪ ▪

The hysteria of the jets is rising. The sky has gone crazy. Utterly wild. This dawn is a warning that today will be the last day of creation. Where are they going to strike next? Where are they not going to strike? Is the area around the airport big enough to absorb all these shells, capable of murdering the sea itself? I turn on the radio and am forced to listen to happy commercials: “Merit cigarettes—more aroma, less nicotine!” “Citizen watches—for the correct time!” “Come to Marlboro, come to where the pleasure is!” “Health mineral water—health from a high mountain!” But where is the water? Increasing coyness from the women announcers on Radio Monte Carlo, who sound as if they’ve just emerged from taking a bath or from an exciting bedroom: “Intensive bombardment of Beirut.” Intensive bombardment of Beirut! Is this aired as an ordinary news item about an ordinary day in an ordinary war in an ordinary newscast? I move the dial to the BBC. Deadly lukewarm voices of announcers smoking pipes within hearing of the listeners. Voices broadcast over shortwave and magnified to a medium wave that transforms them into repulsive vocal caricatures: “Our correspondent says it would appear to cautious observers that what appears of what is gradually becoming clearer when the spokesman is enabled except for the difficulty in getting in touch with the events, which would perhaps indicate that both warring parties are no doubt trying especially not to mention a certain ambiguity which may reveal fighter planes with unknown pilots circling over if we want to be accurate for it might confirm that some people are now appearing in beautiful clothes.” A formal Arabic with correct information, ending with a song by Muhammad Abd al-Wahhab in colloquial Arabic with the correct emotion: “Either come see me, or tell me where to meet you / Or else tell me where to go, to leave you alone.”

Identically monotonous voices. Sand describing sea. Eloquent voices beyond reproach, describing death as they would the weather, and not as they would a horse or motorcycle race. What am I searching for? I open the door several times, but find no newspaper. Why am I looking for the paper when buildings are falling in all directions? Is that not writing enough?

Like this:

Related

3 comments

[…] enjoyment of his words that I sincerely hope that his work continues to be read and remembered (not least by starting to read Memory for Forgetfullness, which is available online in its entirety) by the generations to come. And equally so (though perhaps a little idealistic on my part), I hope […]