Samsung gets expedited Galaxy Nexus injunction hearing

The US Court of Appeals has granted Samsung's request to expedite its appeal of the preliminary injunction against the Galaxy Nexus. The company must file its court brief to start the process before July 16 and Apple has until July 30 to respond.
The final comments on the case are due on...

If Samsung cuts off my nexus device price because of apple then I will cut that apple into.two pieces and never buy that iPhone whatever it is ..I have already used my earning for buying galaxy nexus i95250

> In reply to WaNgSa86 @ 2012-07-16 12:19 from Pvmi - click to readYes very true. I guess American companies like to "sue" every country except themselves. Without the helping hand of Samsung in terms of supplying chips to Apple, Apple wouldn't be able to do anything. Apple needs to think of new ideas, stop suing other companies and to save their money instead of paying huge lawyer fees.

Samsungs exeynos CPU is arguably the best in the world.....your making it as if Apple made the CPU and Samsung is using it. Apple is using Samsung tech not the other way around.

As for your baseless comment about Android phones having to be restarted, so iphone never freezes or crashes or never has to be restarted....well that would be a lie, I had an iphone converted to android for the freedom....guess what the iphone does crash and does need to be restarted....not to mention the iphone crashes more than android....enjoy the proofhttp://www.eweek.com/c/a/Mobil...port-358312/

if Samsung and Apple break their contractual obligations apple should go for nvidia or qualcomm and the result will be very interesting!
iphone 5 or maybe the new iphone(nvidia tegra3 or qualcomm s4)vs galaxy note 2(exynos 5250)!!!

> In reply to rayjan29 @ 2012-07-16 04:30 from t7Jf - click to readSamsung had a thriving phone business long before the iPhone was even mentioned. I had two such devices. They were durable, well designed and had custom alarm tones. Oh wait, Apple's going to introduce this revolutionary feature in iOS6.
And Samsung is doing well in every other market it's got a presence in, be it computers, home appliances or televisions. They're also a very sizable fabrication company. Don't think they can't survive without Android. Even without Android, they have Tizen or Bada.

If only Apple followers (because yeah, it's as bad as a cult) would wake up and realise what's going on.

You can see it in the comments, "Apple the greatest", "Samsung sucks balls and would lose millions if Apple pulled out"..

It's laughable.

The fact of the matter is, if Samsung and Apple could break their contractual obligations, Apple would lose the most. Samsung wouldn't even realise that Apple had stopped paying them. Yes, smartphones are a massive market, but Apple only make mp3 players and computers. Samsung are one of the biggest electronic companies in the world. If you think that Apple could turn around and just find another comapany who would supply the same amount of parts, of the same quality, on time... you're kidding yourself.

But then in the same thought, if Apple stopped concentrating on trying to drag others down, and started looking at innovation again, they wouldn't have to worry about Samsung.

It's all gone to pot since Steve Jobs died. He was the true innovator in Apple.

> In reply to tnkrulz @ 2012-07-15 22:25 from ITJT - click to readWhat planet are you on? While you are partly correct, if Apple lose their contracts with Samsung, they're going to be in serious trouble - they will need to find a new provider, since Apple purchases rather than innovates, and while some companies will be up for it, I would imagine some of the major players will stay well clear of Apple due to Apple's behaviour. Getting involved with Apple is very expensive in court fees...