The chronologically relative tense

Globe and Mail columnist
Ron Mickleburgh opens his article in the Saturday edition of that paper with the following lead:

In mere days, Vancouver’s turn in the Olympic spotlight will
be just six months away.

a curious circumlocution which provides us with an excellent
example of the chronologically relative tense – also known as the Slaughterhouse-Five tense, after the
Kurt Vonnegut novel which features a character who has become “unstuck in
time.”

I suppose we should be grateful to the Globe’s editors: things could have been even more opaque; a Geist mole inside the Globe’s Vancouver bureau has provided us
with an early draft of Mickleburgh’s piece, which, in its initial state, began

Two years, seven months and a few days from a week ago next
Wednesday, we will be able to cast back our minds six years, four months, three
weeks and two days to a point in time when the opening of the 2010 Winter
Olympics was still four years and six months or so away.