You are here

Incoming President Emmanuel Macron has promised change. But there is no sign he’ll be any different from his predecessor when it comes to France’s pro-Israel policies. (via Facebook)

France’s Israel lobby appears to hold a veto over who can run as a parliamentary candidate on the ticket of incoming President Emmanuel Macron’s party.

French media reported on Friday that Macron’s En Marche! movement had dropped one of its candidates for National Assembly elections in June.

This came after the French Israel lobby groups LICRA and CRIF demanded that the candidate, television producer Christian Gerin, be dumped for making what they alleged were anti-Semitic tweets and for supporting the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement.

CRIF is a Jewish communal organization as well as a major Israel lobby group. Gerin’s tweet referenced CRIF’s annual gala the same night.

“This is anti-Semitic because behind the term ‘CRIF,’ it’s ‘Jews’ that is the subtext,” CRIF’s president Francis Kalifat told the newspaperLe Parisien.

But there’s no denying that CRIF functions in France much as AIPAC does in the United States – as the main lobby for Israel and its aims.

As leading newspaper Le Figaronoted in February, CRIF’s annual dinner has taken on ever greater significance in French politics in recent years, and this year it was attended by several candidates in the presidential election, including the winner.

Criticism of the outsize role that the CRIF dinner has taken on in French politics has been voiced by mainstream figures.

“CRIF no longer represents anyone and it does not function in a democratic way,” Phillippe Karsenty, deputy mayor of Neuilly-sur-Seine and a well-known figure in the Jewish community, told Le Figaro.

“CRIF ceased to be the representative of Jews towards politicians, and became the representative of politicians to the Jews.” (Karsenty is notorious for falsely claiming that French television staged the footage of the killing in September 2000 in Gaza of the Palestinian boy Muhammad al-Durra.)

Writer Alain Finkielkraut has likened CRIF to a tribunal where “members of the French government appear before a communal prosecutor.”

In 2012, François Bayrou, a well-known centrist and former presidential candidate who this year endorsed Macron, refused an invitation to the CRIF dinner.

“I thought about it a lot over many years and I reached the conclusion that I should no longer participate in these communal gatherings,” Bayrou explained. “I think that France is one, that its citizens are first and foremost citizens before they are Jews, Catholics, Muslims, Buddhists, agnostics or atheists.”

Bayrou was expressing a standard version of French republican secularism or laïcité.

The French AIPAC

Crucially, one of CRIF’s most vocal roles – as The Electronic Intifada has often reported – has been as the main advocate against the movement for Palestinian rights.

Outgoing President François Hollande and his former prime minister Manuel Valls have used their CRIF appearances to express strong support for Israel and to attack BDS.

(In a 2013 tweet objected to by LICRA, Gerin called Valls “viscerally Zionist, racist and Islamophobic.”)

In 2015, Hollande used his speech to tar critics of Israel and its state ideology Zionism as anti-Semites.

In his last speech to CRIF as president in February, Hollande boasted that “France has fought the BDS movement with no weakness.”

He also claimed – based on his interpretation of a court decision that is currently being appealed in the European Court of Human Rights – that France is the only country to have outlawed calls for boycotts of Israeli goods.

Although Marine Le Pen has never been invited to a CRIF dinner, CRIF’s then president Roger Cukierman raised eyebrows in 2015 when he said that the leader of the notoriously anti-Semitic, anti-Muslim and racist Front National was “personally beyond criticism.” Le Pen repaid the compliment with praise for Israel and attacks on the BDS movement.

Protecting its clout

Given the highly controversial role CRIF plays in French politics, it ought to be possible to criticize its political role without being accused of anti-Semitism.

And it is also easy to see why CRIF would want to tar critics as anti-Semites when it has an obvious interest in protecting its growing political clout.

The statement warned that the July 2016 truck attack that killed dozens of people in Nice should not be exploited politically by Israel and its supporters. The statement came in response to calls by some politicians who compared Palestinians to Islamic State and urged that France follow Israel as a model for fighting terrorism.

Even the head of LICRA has called on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to stop telling Jews to leave Europe after such attacks.

But LICRA nonetheless demanded that Macron pull Gerin’s candidacy and said it may refer his tweets to prosecutors.

Not noted by LICRA is that Gerin has also tweeted apparent praise of Israel. In 2013, he wrote that the documentary The Gatekeepers, in which former Israeli intelligence chiefs criticize their country’s policies, “is a lesson in democracy that is to Israel’s credit.”

More candidates targeted

According to Le Parisien, CRIF and LICRA are now going after another of Macron’s parliamentary candidates, who they accuse of supporting BDS.

Comments

In the run-up to the presidential elections the French authorities expressed their extreme concern about Russia meddling in its political processes. It turns out there has been no such influence from Russia's side, in any case there is no evidence whatsoever.

On the other hand, israel's influence through its proxies Licra & Crif is absolutely staggering. What's more, the influence has been exerted with that most flimsy of arguments - antisemitism new style - which means criticism of israel.

It is a disgrace that the EU, and France in particular, accepts this kind of behaviour from a state that has been proven incontrovertibly & irrefutably to be an apartheid state, which is engaged in incremental genocide of the Palestinians, and which has more or less turned totalitarian. How much longer are we going to kowtow to this country & accept its blackmail ???

"France’s Israel lobby appears to hold a veto over who can run as a parliamentary candidate on the ticket of incoming President Emmanuel Macron’s party."
"_____ Israel lobby appears to hold a veto over who can run as a parliamentary candidate on the ticket of incoming President ______________ party.
Substitute any western country and its President, or Prime Minister in the blanks and you have the overall picture of western politics.

Crif and LICRA have vast influence, and the "land of the rights of man" has no freedom of speech in regard to Israel. Every candidate feels compelled to submit, and even the FN is totally in thrall. Islamophobia, of course, is quite acceptable, and people are imprisoned for anti- israel comments or acts of boycott, while any act of any Muslim is suspect, though most of the millions are French citizens with similar support of "laicité"as the rest of us.

I'm not aware of people who've been imprisoned for anti-Israeli comments nor for BDS actions. They've been dragged to court, some have been fined, some released, but not imprisoned. I'm not saying this to excuse anything, just to set things straight.
And Mélenchon has been harsh on Israeli politics for a very long time (even when he was still in the Socialist Party) and on the Zionist lobby aka CRIF. If you understand French, listen to his speech in August 2014 at the Parti de Gauche's annual meeting, it was at the height of the Gaza massacre, and honestly I still get tears in my eyes when I listen to his words: strong condemnations with huge applauses from the audience.

On a side note; the separation between the CRIF and the State that Gerin tweeted is a hint at the French 1905 law on laïcité concerning "the separation between the Churches and the State"

I didn't know that Israeli have a good influence in the politics of France but if the President wants to change the parliamentary, then the people should understand or follow. I think that if there are further conflicts about this, it would be better to talk it out to the parliamentary.