Discussing his uncertainty, the retired couple walked off along the popular recreational trail in this small town...

How old does a woman have to be before she stops thinking first and above all about her reproductive rights? Well, at least they are still "discussing his uncertainty" as they walk away, even though she made a declarative statement about how the 2 of them are voting. Maybe he needed to work through his feelings to understand why he is so fuzzy about his reasons for doing what he is going to do.

'What about my reproductive rights?' she asked, clearly upset. 'No, we are voting for Obama!'"

I just tore up a fundraising letter from planned parenthood and mailed it back to them with a note that asked them not to give their vote for free to the Democrats. This woman should think about how she is being manipulated by the Democratic party overlords.

I went through some really interesting abuse from people over me saying "So if someone else doesn't pay for your pills and abortions, that means you CAN'T have them?" That was effectively going into their church and peeing on the altar.

I still find it amazing, this belief that "Unless someone else pays for it, I don't have access to it!"

She should also consider that if Obama stays in, she won't be able to afford to eat enough to ovulate.

How dare those women be concerned about their reproductive rights! Especially the old ones, why should they have an opinion on the topic? They should just shut up and vote on what WE think is important.

Another high profile back-out of the GOP. Jindal nows says that that Romney could not help LA from floods. He needs federal experience, which only POTUS has. Oh my, what a stab in the back. Every-GOP who wants WH favors has to stab Romney. An open season thanks to the NYT and NPR.

edutcher babbles: Some phony folksy casts his lot with irrelevance. As so often has been the case.

Given that the topic is voting behavior and the extent it should link with the issue of reproductive rights, my comment is pretty relevant. That reading comprehension issue of yours shows itself once again.

But as I said - conservatives, please continue with this line of argument when addressing socially liberal voters (male or female) you want to come over to vote for Romney. It can only help you!

As most of the commenters here have noted, middle-aged women's reproductive issues are scarce as hen's teeth.

Creaky, brain-washed feminists just require an excuse to go all Hopenchange again.

And "reproductive rights", last I looked, are pretty far down the list of important issues this time out so socially liberal voters (the ones that can't bear the thought of deny a black man their vote) are either going to be as Hopeless as last time or are going to be concerned with the more relevant (there's that word again) issues of inflation, job creation, and economy.

I was once under the impression that feminism was about women being taken seriously for other reasons besides our reproductive organs. Loutish,sexist men defined women first and foremost as vaginas. Women fought for the right to become educated, to join the professions, to become respected for their intelligence and ability.

Well, silly me. It turns out feminism in 2012 is all about defining yourself first and foremost in exactly the same way those bad old male chauvinists used to - as pussy.

Similiarly, I once thought that civil rights for minorities meant working toward a society as color-blind as possible. Instead, we're as obsessed with skin color as any southern slaveholder ever was. The slave South came up with ridiculous catagories, such as "octoroons," to ensure that anybody with a black ancestor would be denied equal rights with blacks. Well, now we have created our own exotic catagories: "white Hispanics," and Lizzie Warren claiming Native American status on the basis of family stories.

The absolute crock of this is the fact that any woman should be scared of MITT ROMNEY taking away birth control.

Most on the conservative side consider Romney a big liberal on the issue. Again up until now, the Obama campaign and media have done a great job as casting Mitt's number one priority being repeal of Roe v. Wade. No actually worse than Roe, taking away all birth control.

Based on his record and background, Romney is actually the pragmatic CENTRIST the media claims these campaigns always lack.

The entire reproductive rights issue is a red herring. Nothing is going to happen to women's reproductive rights no matter who is elected. That would take a constitutional amendment and that's not happening.

Using public funds to pay for abortions, birth control, etc is not a right. It's welfare If that's what she's talking about, she's just another greedy feminist who thinks the rest of us should subsidize her lifestyle.

I don't think you guys should discount the probability that a 60+ woman would consider feminist issues important in her vote. I'm past reproduction myself, but I still remember the issues that concerned me.

It's just that, for me, reproductive autonomy doesn't include either abortion or taxpayer-funded contraception, so no amount of vagina-scare talk is going to get me to pull a Democratic lever. I have confidence in the ability of women to control what they need to control in their lives as long as we have a functioning economy and some semblance of property rights.

Obama: fighting for the conceptual right of the post-menopausal to have babies!

Maybe ObamaCare will pay for a post-menopausal woman's right to use assisted reproduction technology to bear a child (it's been done) & Obama will support the right to abort that child for any reason.

Wait for some kind of update to the Life of Julia - they didn't want to turn off the youth vote by going that far into Julia's life, but if demographics show a need, they will add some panels. Post-menopausal Julia after a childless, single life will be able to bear a child of her own & of course, the government will take care of the child if/when Julia is unable to.

Tyrone Slothrop said...How does this (ideologue) imagine her reproductive rights will change under President Romney? Seriously?

==================It's not about Romney - it is about a belief many women have, hardened in stone, that the real Republican is a Right to Life fanatic that thinks all abortion is murder , all women that have had an abortion are murderers, all women that support abortion in certain instances are murderers.

Reagan could be anti-abortion and women let it pass, because they got strong signals that Reagan didn't hate them and didn't want to criminalize them.But the Fundies and RTLrs were on full display in the Terri Schiavo fiasco. And a lightbulb went on in many women's head that it was now about Feds and law enforcement being used by the male Republicans to criminalize end of life decisions. And clearly on display in the Republican's Schiavo Fiasco was a craving to overturn Roe and make all abortions criminal since "life begins at conception as Sweet Baby Jesus ensouls the sweet babies of his".

Republicans are also tricked a little by polls that have women protesting they are not Nazi eugenicists because majorities claim they do not want abortions simply if the fetus is doomed by genetic disease or so defectibe that the mother's life is effectively over save as caregiver for the "Downs Baby Jesus gifted her with, etc.".

Steve Austin said it well...Until the Todd Akin crowd recognizes they have to tone down the rhetoric and settle for incremental progress like fighting for the partial birth ban the GOP will always be working from behind.

DADvocate said...The entire reproductive rights issue is a red herring. Nothing is going to happen to women's reproductive rights no matter who is elected. That would take a constitutional amendment and that's not happening.

-----------------------It's hardly a red herring when you have GOP Senate candidates saying that he opposes a rape exception because a RTL quack doctor told him that women who actually were raped vs. pretending to be raped never get pregnant.

The quack Right to Lifer says that Jesus gave women natural defenses to prevent conception and the new soul needing saving -if they were really raped vs. willingly partaking in carnal pleasures and pretending to be raped later.

That is the depth of stupidity Republican RTL zealots will go to to justify no exceptions save life of the mother.

Doesn't help Santorum trotting out his Trisomy 18 kid as a gift from Jesus every family should similarly be blessed with.

Or male Republicans that retort back to women asking "what about the physical health of the mother" with "what about the physical health of the baby being murdered?' - and leave thinking they won the debate and women will soon see the errors of their baby-killing ways...

"How old does a woman have to be before she stops thinking first and above all about her reproductive rights"?

I hope I never get too old to stop thinking about mine, my hopefully daughter's and her daughters as well.

Many would do well to stop leading such self absorbed lives, void of caring and compassion, and negligent about responsibility towards others.

The biggest waste we have is seemingly intelligent leaders who don't give a rat's ass about anyone or anything that doesn't immediately pertain to them. And I won't ever let down my guard toward keeping a hoard of beserk endomorphs from making reproductive decisions for me.

Never ceases to amaze me that so many people on the left base their vote on what a woman can do with her own body when it comes to abortion, yet it doesn't matter to 'em one iota what the candidate's stance is in regards to what everyone...men and women...can do with their own bodies when it comes to eating/drinking/ingesting all-natural plants & herbs.

All this fear about reproductive rights. Assuming that this is about the Supreme Court and abortion, the truth is that there is utterly no chance that Romney will appoint justices who will "turn the tide" on the court.

There are at most 3 justices who support overturning Roe. Scalia, Thomas and maybe Alito. Roberts clearly will not as he missed the cut at Obamacare. Of the remaining 3, I wonder how many actually would vote to overturn something that was declared stare decisis in 1993? Something that by now 3 generations of women have relied upon.

Perhaps none.

Despite it having been a completely lawless and impolitic decision, the window to redress it is now closed. That should sink in soon.

At most, congress can work to de-fund tax payer funded abortion.At most.

The upcoming debates: Watch as pro-democrat/Pro-Obama media launch weird Stephanopoulos type questions at Romney about contraception, rape and abortion. It will be all vagina all the time.Obama will get the softballs.

A more relevant discussion for these two mature adults would have been how their pensions, social securiy, savings etc will fare after a 67% devaluation of the US dollars they are fixed into and a forced subsequent reliance on what a newly Death Paneled Medicare permitted care will permit them when they become sick.

The war on womens' sexual freedom is relevant, but a war on men, women and children by Obama's economics designed to create a third world serfdom more relevant.

yet it doesn't matter to 'em one iota what the candidate's stance is in regards to what everyone...men and women...can do with their own bodies when it comes to eating/drinking/ingesting all-natural plants & herbs.

OK, Lindsey, you seem to want to take the side of the aging female ideologue. Maybe you can give me an answer to the question I posed at 9:44 am-- how does this ideologue imagine her reproductive "rights" will change under President Romney? Remember, there is no definitive "right" to have the State pay for your contraception.

mesquito: Who uses the term "reproductive rights" in a casual conversation? A politicized liberal, that's who.

I was thinking more along the lines of "propagandized moron", but OK.

What is it with these fascist thug (oh, excuse me, "liberal", "open-minded") ladies who think they get to dictate their mates' votes?

Occasionally I stumble upon the blogs of "traditionalist" boors who brag about ordering their wives to vote as they're told. Ms. "we're voting for Obama" would no doubt have a feminist hissy fit if she came across that, and never, ever grasp that she's the same kind of stupid jerk.

I find it depressing that so many women on the left are willfully blind to the economic disaster Obama has created for their children and grandchildren.Talk about selfish.Current Per person debt: $51,107.80Thanks Obama.

I find it depressing that so many women on the left are willfully blind to the economic disaster Obama has created for their children and grandchildren.Talk about selfish.Current Per person debt: $51,107.80Thanks Obama.

9/23/12 12:32 PM

Exactly, AprilApple. Talk about reinforcing those 19th century notions about women being incapable of logic. We're only concerned with the workings of our sex organs; leave the icky math stuff and the big world issues to the menfolks.

Ugh. Romney will not overturn abortion any time soon. First we'd have to have a number of judges die or retire. Then a case would have to be made. Even if it were overturned it would go back to the sates where, presumably the blue states would allow abortions. So, your rights are safe. Meanwhile, good luck finding a job and paying your bills. Priorities people.

ALso, if the wife thinks that free contraception is part of her reproductive rights then she is a true idiot. Also, to the husband. Grow some balls. You are a thinking, grown man. You don't have to vote in a block with your wife if you don't like Obama. Geeze. We know who wears the pants in the family that's for sure.

Everyone knows that the first thing Reagan, Bush 41, and Bush 43 did when they assumed the office of the Presidency was to sign Executive Orders banning abortion.

Okay, so maybe they didn't do THAT, but at least they used the power of the bully pulpit to force Congress to pass legislation banning abortion in all 50 states.

Okay, so maybe they didn't do THAT either. But it doesn't matter, because everyone knows that Romney will definitely do that. And he'll certainly be targeting the wives of retirees as well, because he knows how important their reproductive rights are.

Yessirree, the most importantest thing on the GOP's mind right now is criminalizing abortion across the whole country. They can't stop talking about it, 24/7.

She should take care of "her reproductive rights" herself and leave her husband alone. Do lib women all control their men -- telling them how to vote based on their own chromosones?

And as a note -- no one ever interfered with my / our reproductive rights. So clearly this over the hill near atrophied -- if not dead ovaried woman is talking about her "right" to abortion. That is more correctly described as a non-reprocutive right.

Get your tubes tied, lady.

(Although I don't know many docs who would do that for the post- menopausal.)

Apparently there was 20,000 people in Milwaukee yesterday to see Obama in the rain.

looked like everybody was inside.

The good news is if 20,000 showed up for the rally there'll be 40,000 voters in Nov.Still not the 135,000 non existant Milwaukee black voters, but it's a start.I hope Obama can count on you, garage to get out there and vote for all the dead people you can.Who knows you might win a place at his table.

Even more depressing than the $51,107.80/person debt-- The big new idea from democrats is: 'Hey let's add to the deficit by forcing tax payers to fund contraception. Sandra Fluke will be our mascot!'Even more depressing than democrat desire for tax payers to pay for contraception during an economic downturn is -- This bullshit all started with former Clinton advisor and democrat operative George Stephanopoulos and his planted question to Romney about contraception. News flash to leftwing fems: Romney may not want to fund your contraception, but he is not going to take it away from you. Don’t be ridiculous. These are serious times and this whole issue is ridiculous. This whole conversation is drummed up absurdity and media manipulation to create a false narrative that gives democrats an issue. Obama cannot run on his record. So here we are. Ridiculous.

On Sept. 11, 2001 about 3000 people lost their reproductive rights along with their lives because of liberal blow job Bill Clinton's indifference to our national security, an indifference to our national security shared by Obama resulting in a less safe America. It seems to me that our national security should be our first and foremost consideration when we decide who to vote for to be our president because all other benefits are dependent on our being safe and free.

The fact that you commenters doubt that women of all ages are concerned about reproductive rights shows that you are quite out of touch. Until Republicans drop the concern trolling about gays and abortions, they arent going to win very many national elections. Ive said it before and Im saying it again.

"Until Republicans drop the concern trolling about gays and abortions, they arent going to win very many national elections."

Which is why they won't be allowed to stop.

How many times did the Republicans mention either gays or abortion at their convention? How many times does Romney or Ryan mention either in any context at all?

How many times did the Democrats mention gays or "reproductive rights" at their convention? It was all "vagina" and all "yay gay military!" all the time. Over and over. I watched it and listened to the speeches just like you did.

The Republicans aren't going to be allowed to change the subject.

Because if the Democrats talk about the economy (or now, foreign policy) they know they lose.

It's a bit disingenuous to fuss that the Republicans "drop" something that's been pretty much dropped while the Democrats spin lies about how women are under attack by meanies who want to ban contraceptives, which is an outright and blatant lie.

Because "I won't pay for it" isn't in any way the same thing as "and I'll prevent you from getting it."

It's all bull shit. You're not satisfied with the Republican national ticket "dropping" the gay and abortion concern trolling.

I got into that discussion with a liberal friend who like me will never have a problem because neither of us have a uterus. As the discussion progressed it seems she was still angry insurance wouldn't pay for her birth control pills back in the day, but they were paying her colleagues bill for Viagra. Earlier it turned out her real trauma was caring for her younger siblings. She revealed that when she was denigrating Sarah Palin for leaving her kids while she campaigned. She just cannot admit her early life damaged her to consider any other point of view. Are they all damaged out there?

Let's understand when someone whines about their "reproductive rights" they're dscussing how unfair it is to have to take a pill every day. So to this fool the Argentina style financial upheaval we're headed for is preferable to expecting someone to actually take a pill.

The article notes that the small town of Mount Horeb has an obsession for trolls.

So, I find it ironic that "guy with Porn Star Pseudonym" shows up today. Of course, I would stand corrected if there would be an opportunity to submit the "lady parts" to examination by Meade or someone else associated with the administration of this blog.

the point being why would you want to introduce more babies into a bad economy?

Or, just into this horrible world period? I've heard women make comments like this countless times. As if they make the world a better place by having abortions, especially partial birth abortions and late term abortions.

Tyrone Slothrop said..."how does this ideologue imagine her reproductive "rights" will change under President Romney?"

An Obama loss will likely be coincident to a loss of control of the senate and a GOP control of government. I just remind you that the House has passed over 30 reproductive related bills in the last 2 years - all of which died in the senate and all of which would have been vetoed by the President.

Can you imagine a world where Mr. Flipper is the last hope against out of control legislators?

Im saying women and people under 40 wont vote for Republicans. You dont like hearing it, but it's true. Arent the great majority of you here supporting Romney male and or over 50? That's what the nation is like too.Im a woman in my 40's BTW.

"Yeah, it just killed them in 1980, 84,88, 94, 2000, 2002, 2004 and 2010"

And 2012, I don't believe the race is close for the polls are unreliable. Remember we have cell phones, caller id, and political correctness. Romney wins, our country wins, Obama and the pollsters lose.

Tyrone Slothrop said... "how does this ideologue imagine her reproductive "rights" will change under President Romney?"

An Obama loss will likely be coincident to a loss of control of the senate and a GOP control of government. I just remind you that the House has passed over 30 reproductive related bills in the last 2 years - all of which died in the senate and all of which would have been vetoed by the President.

Can you imagine a world where Mr. Flipper is the last hope against out of control legislators?

Romney has a big lead among married women, only single women who see government as a surrogate daddy/husband do the Dems have a majority. Young people probably do vote for the Dems more than Republicans but that is because they still have a lot of life to live and learn.

Read the bills. Further, I gather you are not in favor of the government having more of a say in our personal lives yet you are willing to have the government into this. I suppose you have a resonable explanation but I have never heard one yet so give it your best shot.

I'm disappointed in that mustard museum. You call that Mustard 101 at Poupon U?

It's a crap quiz, films and such, a joke.

You'd do better at Wikipedia. But here's what Professor Ahoy would teach at his Mustard 101, it's a very simple class, everyone gets an A.

To make the most extraordinary mustard you will have ever tasted once you do this, buy a tin of mustard powder and dump it into a bowl. Add a few tablespoons of your favorite vinegar to a thick paste and behold the amazing aroma that knocks you backward. Add water to desired spreadable thinness and continue thinning to your heart's condimentment, I mean, contentment.

No salt, no MSG, no additional spices, no nut'n. Do this once, and you will never buy prepared mustard again.

Additionally you can buy seeds yellow or brown and heat those if you wish, or not, or crush them, or not, and add them too, or not.

The mustard family, Brassicaceae, includes horseradish and wasabi. I find those components are evident in mustard prepared directly from powder. And the effect is so awesome to me that I recommend it, and as much as I do recommend it, I note also, other people like this a heck of lot more than I do.

And you're over there thinking probably, "So what. That family you mentioned also includes cabbage and radishes, so does your mustard carry those elements too?" Then I would say, "No, it doesn't, Smartass. I was wrong about everyone getting an A. F for you at Poupon U."

As for if the story happened: I was at an after-work get-together with some coworkers and a lady of about 52 was ragging on Romney. One of the things she said was, "I don't know how any woman could vote for Romney". I don't know what other thing this could be other than "reproductive rights", but there may be some other women's issue she had in mind.

I did not however respond in the two ways I was tempted to do: One, point out that my wife intends to vote Romney and two, the real voter gap is not men v. women, it is married people v. unmarried people. I didn't want to point this one out because she was divorced a couple of year's ago.

I have directed as many women as possible to read this blog to understand how Republican men think, and why they should not vote for Romney. So far at least one Republican neighbor I met while walking our dogs called to tell me she has flipped to Obama. Thanks folks keep up the work.

dreams said...On Sept. 11, 2001 about 3000 people lost their reproductive rights along with their lives because of liberal blow job Bill Clinton's indifference to our national security, an indifference to our national security shared by Obama resulting in a less safe America. ================What a load of horseshit.We lost lives because an enemy attacked -- a radical Islamist enemy we in some ways cannot change, in other ways that we went out of our way to piss off.

The crap about holding Presidents responsible for each life the enemy takes is utter partisan extremist drivel.Like Lincoln, and not a better President who would have had Zero Casualties - killed 660,000 people in the Civil War. Or FDR and Truman failed utterly in WWII because we had 280,000 dead.

Same holds true of the idiot notion swallowed by both right wing and left wing extremists that bin Laden was the SOLE person with the LEADER/CEO of Terror authority to launch an operation on the USA.

And by their brain-dead logic, which "dreams" typifies:

1. Clinton KILLED 2900 people on 9/11 because he failed to kill or arrest bin Laden, which would have ended all activities by radical Muslims to kill Americans.2. Bush in turn also KILLED the same 2900 Americans because the "attack happened on his watch and he didn't stop it"!!3. And of course, "Obama ended all global terrorism by leading the mission to kill bin Laden, the SOLE Head Evildoer!!".

What a brainless crock of shit.

When you face an intelligent thinking enemy in battle, you will take casualties, no matter how well-trained and talented your "high tech heroes" are, no matter how well led a military or government is.

And in the scale of wars, 2900 is a pretty low piddling amount as wars go...and no, the 9/11 Victims and the famous Victim Families are not held by the world to be the Greatest and most Sanctified Victims Ever.

More so than in the past, but our idiot Democracy has always had a certain number of single issue voters.

Both Parties have taken damage when they listen too much to, or gear Primaries so, that those single issue voters have undue clout that does not advance the nations welfare.

Government employee unions have damaged the country by only voting on who gives them the most goodies from taxpayers.

Blacks who only vote on skin color damage the Party and the country by elevating incompetent black leaders for life that damage the country, even blacks.

The Republicans kow-towing to Right to Life fanatics and boot-licking the Top 1% that has concentrated most new wealth created in America to themselves in the last 30 years - has damaged the Republicans with the far larger woman's population (also with too many single issue voters on reproductive issues), and workers who see the Republicans as in the pockets of the 1%.

And by workers, I don't mean OWS nutballs, but the workers that haven't seen their wages grow in 30 years in real dollars, jobs threatened weekly with export to China..while Republicans bootlick the bankers and owners whose wealth on average has quadrupled in the last 30 years.

roesch/voltaire said...I have directed as many women as possible to read this blog to understand how Republican men think, and why they should not vote for Romney. So far at least one Republican neighbor I met while walking our dogs called to tell me she has flipped to Obama. Thanks folks keep up the work.

OMG, Romney is losing that hotbed of conservatism called Madison, Wisconsin.

chickelit said...Cedarford crowed: We lost lives because an enemy attacked -- a radical Islamist enemy we in some ways cannot change, in other ways that we went out of our way to piss off.

Wright on, Jerimiad!

=================Sorry, one of the last Neocons!!

Even Bush admitted we had done some pretty stupid things that needlessly cast America as the enemy in many Muslim eyes.

1. Stationing troops under pressure on the monarchy and Sausi citizens to do so, in Saudi Arabia.

2. Aggressively pushing our values on Islamic countries, with the same mindset as colonialists that started with "If you darkies know what is good for you, you will discard your disgusting ways, manner, and religion - and serve the greater Empire better."

3. Too much "tilting" towards repressive rulers and backing almost every Israeli desire over what Muslims wanted.

We DID meddle. We DID go out of our way to piss them off. AND we did it with the conceit that we could have our way with no harm or blowback coming back at us - since the Muslims were helpless in the face of the Mighty High-Tech Hyperpower and the New World Order America headed.

"Bush in turn also KILLED the same 2900 Americans because the "attack happened on his watch and he didn't stop it"!!"

Bush didn't cause those deaths because that attack was planned while Clinton was in office and Clinton didn't respond appropriately to the first world trade center attack. A strong national defense is very important and the Dems have proven time and again that they can't be trusted with our country's national security.

If you can't perform the Vagina Monologues without a Swiffer cloth, I think "your" reproductive rights are moot. Unless this woman gets in vitro just so she can subsequently get an abortion, she needs to let it go.

And really? Whose #1 voting issue is their cooter? It's like, yeah, okay, our economy has collapsed, we're on the edge edge of insolvency, the Middle East is on fire, the housing market is in the sitter--but what about my cooter?! This woman is a selfish cunt. I see why she loves Obama.

So far at least one Republican neighbor I met while walking our dogs called to tell me she has flipped to Obama. Thanks folks keep up the work.

Bullshit!

During the 2008 elections, I kept hearing "my spouse is voting for Obama, and my spouse always votes Republican" coming from down ticket politicians. I heard it so many times that I figured it was not only bullshit, but on the talking points list.

"We DID meddle. We DID go out of our way to piss them off. AND we did it with the conceit that we could have our way with no harm or blowback coming back at us - since the Muslims were helpless in the face of the Mighty High-Tech Hyperpower and the New World Order America headed."

You anti-American liberal pile of shit, I don't have nothing but contempt for people like you.The USA has been the greatest force for good in the history of the world.

"And really? Whose #1 voting issue is their cooter? It's like, yeah, okay, our economy has collapsed, we're on the edge edge of insolvency, the Middle East is on fire, the housing market is in the sitter--but what about my cooter?! This woman is a selfish cunt. I see why she loves Obama."

Yeah.

Who else is so consumed by their cooters? And cooters is a great word because it sounds just as stupid as this all is. Like Naomi Wolfe and her cooter.

We insult men by implying they think with their dick. But when a woman does it, it's *special*.

"We insult men by implying they think with their dick. But when a woman does it, it's *special*."

9/23/12 2:54 PM

This.

Liberal women don't seem to be able to grasp that it is a diminishment of themselves, of their individuality and brains, to reduce their political concerns to "reproductive rights." They are doing to themselves exactly what they accuse sexist males of doing. The same is true of blacks and Hispanics who vote their skin color, or gays who base their vote entirely on the gay marriage issue.

I have heard a similar, completely idiotic comment from my 76 year old mother concerning "her reproductive rights." The Islamists have openly declared war on us and are attacking our embassies and killing our diplomatic personnel. The U.S. government may become so debt ridden that economy may well cease to function and/or the savings of the middle class will be confiscated by hyperinflation. Our armed presence is in retreat around the world. And this woman's priority is "her reproductive rights?" She's obviously never read Stroker Ace, nor has anyone else who thinks the way she does: "It is useless to step on the brakes when the car is upside down."

"Liberal women don't seem to be able to grasp that it is a diminishment of themselves, of their individuality and brains, to reduce their political concerns to "reproductive rights." They are doing to themselves exactly what they accuse sexist males of doing. The same is true of blacks and Hispanics who vote their skin color, or gays who base their vote entirely on the gay marriage issue."

One of the side effects of the sexual revolution, the feminist movement is less respect for women, I think.

Stupid people are probably the easiest to sell bumper stickers to. I'm going to start making a bunch to sell to this niche demographic of vagina-obsessed liberals women. Things like:

If my cooter could vote, she would vote OBAMA!

Forget Libya; what about my labia?!

I don't have the graphic design chops to pull this one off, but I was thinking of turning the famous Obama O (the one that looks like a sunrise [or sunset, depending on your view]) into a vagina. Teehee.

Actually, you tied it into abortion and gay rights. Are you backing off that now, or is it your position that these issues trump, for example, our skyrocketing national debt and its impact on our children with younger voters.

With the help of a sycophant press, Obama is running a brilliant campaign. His people issue decrees which conflict with the rights of the Catholic church. When the Republicans defend the Catholic church he accuses them of being against women's reproductive rights. That is a double win for him. He attacks the largest Christian church in the world, and in the process turns his attack into a Republican War on Women.

At the same time the women are angry at the Republicans because of their manufactured War on Women, he is doing his best to promote the interests of Islam at the expense of Christians, Hindus, and Jews around the world.

You have to give Obama his due. He has no consicence, but his ability to lie and deceive is exceptional.

IS it just me, or are liberal women bossy bitches even (or particularly) with their own husbands?

And that Liberal men are serious wussies for going along with it? Is this why liberal men don't respect the military, and treat the brave as if they are "cowboys" because they know that in comparison they are only as manly as their wives let them be?

Remember the recent article (linked here, or elsewhere?) about the woman faced with a moral dilemma: should she mail her husband's absentee ballot (knowing her husband was voting Republican) along with her own, or should she not?

Ultimately, she "did the right thing." She tore her husband's ballot up.