Thursday, June 7, 2012

Huxley Warned Us

by Phaedrus

Part 1

Preamble:

Aldous Huxley was one of the most outstanding visionaries of the 20th
century. His predictions of the direction in which the world was heading
have since been proven to be breathtakingly accurate. In 1932 Huxley
published his seminal masterpiece, 'Brave New World' - a novel depiction of
a 'dystopian utopia' where the vast majority of the world's populace
were genetically and socially-engineered slaves who labored quite
contentedly in their ignorance, under the direction of a class of
persons described as 'World Controllers' - an unelected elite who kept
their underlings in willful subjugation via a combination of relentless
subliminal propaganda, free sex, mindless, meaningless, undemanding
entertainment and the distribution of a rewarding, 'feel-good'
psychotropic drug.

This futuristic novel was set in the in the 26th century, by which time
Huxley envisioned his predictions would most likely become reality.
However, alarmed by the speed at which the dystopia he had described was
coming to fruition, he was forced to accept that the likely arrival of
Brave New World (for real) would in fact be much, much sooner than he
had ever imagined. In1958 he wrote a sequel entitled: 'Brave New World
Revisited'. In this reflective and recondite essay, he held up his
prophecies to the transparent scrutiny afforded by the intervening 26
years of socio-political change. He concluded, much to his despair, that
the nightmare world he had foreseen in the distant future was in
reality "only just around the corner."

Now, fast-forward over 50 years. Phaedrus herewith examines
a series of extracts from Huxley's 1958 sequel to see exactly how far
down the road to outright totalitarianism and slavish subservience we
have traveled. The conclusions drawn are as alarming as one could
possibly imagine and beg the questions: has a Brave New World been the
agenda all along? Did Huxley merely PREDICT its inception? Or did he
rather go no small way towards INSPIRING it? Perhaps some clues to this
enigma will hopefully arise in the course of this series. Huxley wrote
BNWR in the late 1950s - in a matter-of-fact style that was in those
days refreshingly free from political-correctness. If you're queasy at
the thought of Plain Truth, the best thing to do is shut down your
computer and get back to Fox News. For everyone else, however, here we
go with our first extract...

"...Omitted from the picture (not as being unimportant, but merely for
convenience and because I have discussed them on earlier occasions) are
the mechanical and military enemies of freedom - the weapons and gadgets
which have so power­fully strengthened the hands of the world's rulers
against their subjects, and the ever more ruinously costly preparations
for ever more senseless and suicidal wars."

"The chapters that follow should be read against a background of
thoughts about the Hungarian uprising and its repression, about the
H-­bombs, about the cost of what every nation refers to as 'defense',
about those endless columns of uniformed boys, white, black, brown,
yellow, marching obediently towards the common grave..."

Much of the above requires no elaboration, but it is interesting to note
that Huxley refers to weapons and gadgets that have strengthened the
hands of the world's rulers AGAINST (their own) subjects. How much more
true is this today than it was 50 years ago? I think we can safely say
the drive towards subjugating the world's populations has continued
unabashed. Out of a combination of apathy and ignorance, we have
permitted this process to be carried out against us. We COULD have stood
up against it, but we didn't. We were warned. We have no excuses. And
now the situation is worse than ever, and shows no sign of any immediate
improvement.

Someone once said (I believe it was
Jefferson) that "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance."
Regrettably, that price is one that collectively we have been unwilling
to pay. In failing in our duty to ourselves and our children, therefore,
we have created a situation in which the only way back to peace and
normality is through bloody revolution, for it certainly cannot be
achieved through the ballot box, as we all now know only too well.

Part 2

Aldous Huxley:

"...Meanwhile impersonal forces over which we have almost no control
seem to be pushing us all in the direction of the Brave New Worldian
nightmare; and this impersonal pushing is being consciously accelerated
by representatives of commercial and political organizations who have
developed a number of new techniques for manipulating, in the interests
of SOME MINORITY [my emphasis] the thoughts and feelings of the masses.
The techniques of manipulation will be discussed in later chapters."

"For the moment let us confine our attentions to those impersonal forces
which are now making the world so extremely unsafe for democracy, so
very inhospitable to individual freedom. What are these forces? And why
has the nightmare which I had projected into the [26th century], made so
swift an advance in our direction? The answer to these questions must
begin where the life of even the most highly civilized society has its
beginnings - on the level of biology."

"On the first Christmas Day the population of our planet was about two
hundred and fifty millions - less than half the population of modern
China. Sixteen centuries later, when the Pilgrim Fathers landed at
Plymouth Rock, human numbers had climbed to a little more than five
hundred millions. By the time of the signing of the Declaration of
Independence, world population had passed the seven hundred million
mark. In 1931, when I was writing Brave New World, it stood at just
under two billions. Today, only twenty-seven years later, there are two
thousand eight hundred million of us. And tomorrow – what?"

Huxley's "tomorrow" is of course our today. And the current population
of the world is over 7
BILLION! In his sequel to Brave New World, Huxley goes on to describe
how better and better drug treatments and cleaner water supplies and
more effective disinfectants will only exacerbate the problem of gross
human overpopulation (we'll see in detail what he has to say about this
later). So when we read the widely-circulated reports about the agents
of the New World Order planning to wipe out over 4 billion of us,
perhaps we can see that there's some method in the madness, even though
some of us reading these lines may be among the masses to be eliminated.
Quite what the selection criteria for this future Cull comprise one can
only speculate, as myself and others have done elsewhere.

However the fact remains that the world IS grossly overpopulated and far
more precariously so now than when the aging Huxley observed it in
1958. In fact we are just starting to see now the onset of widespread
food shortages he predicted elsewhere in BNWR. This has shown up in
recent steeply rising food prices world-wide, and shortages of basic
staples in places such as Africa and the far east. The author is also
quite correct to refer to these mysterious forces as "impersonal" - for
those behind them care not one jot about you or I, but only their own
survival and enrichment. As we saw in Part 1, we have to wake up to the
fact that our so-called 'leaders' are in fact our REAL enemies, and far
more dangerous than any creation from their feverish collective
imagination that they might, from time to time, conjure up to threaten
us with.

Finally, note Huxley's supposed use of the term "some minority" in the
first paragraph. I think we can all guess to whom he is referring here
and I believe it is unlikely (having read much of the man) that he was
quite so diplomatic in this original manuscript. However, the text we
are studying here is sourced from the Random House edition of BNWR - and
like most other publishing houses, Random House is totally owned and
controlled by the Jews. I believe therefore that the temptation to tone
down the original text was probably too much for them. Heaven knows how
many other original manuscripts have been given the same treatment in
the course of history in order to stifle the warnings they contain.

Part 3

In this 3rd part of this series on the predictions of Aldous Huxley, the
great visionary bemoans the fact that in our increasingly overpopulated
world, the people who constitute the principal component of the problem
by producing the most children who will themselves go on to reproduce
prodigiously; propagate poor quality genetic material and turn out huge
numbers of biologically-inferior offspring.

Common sense observations like this could be made freely 50 years ago at
the time Huxley was writing, but just imagine the difficulty a
professional person would encounter in re-iterating these simple truths
today. They'd be branded as a Nazi or a eugenicist and God only knows
what else. The result has been that the issue of differential breeding
rates between the races and the population explosion cannot even be
discussed! A time-bomb is ticking away that could eventually destroy the
planet, yet political-correctness dictates we must remain silent on
this. {ed. note: the idea of poor quality genetic material and biologically-inferior offspring must always include man-made environmental factors and the possibility/probability of deliberate tampering of DNA for nefarious reasons}

Huxley, 1958:

"In the second half of the twentieth century, we do nothing systematic
about our breeding; but in our random and unregulated way, we are not
only overpopulating the planet, we are also, it would seem, making sure
that these greater numbers shall be of biologically poorer quality. In
the bad old days children with considerable, or even slight, hereditary
defects rarely survived. Today, thanks to sanitation, modern
pharmacology and the social conscience, most of the children born with
hereditary defects reach maturity and multiply their kind. Under the
conditions now prevailing, every advance in medicine will tend to be
offset by a corresponding advance in the survival rates of individuals
cursed by some genetic insufficiency. In spite of new wonder drugs and
better treatment (indeed, in a certain sense, precisely because of these
things), the physical health of the general population will show no
improvement, and may even deteriorate. And along with a decline in
average healthiness there may well go a decline in average intelligence.
Indeed, some competent authorities are convinced that such a decline
has already taken place and is continuing. 'Under conditions that are
both soft and unregulated,' writes Dr W.H. Sheldon, 'our best stock
tends to be out-bred by stock that is inferior to it in every respect
... It is the fashion in some academic circles to assure students that
the alarm over differential birth-rates is unfounded; that these
problems are merely economic, or merely educational, or merely
religious, or merely cultural or something of the sort. This is
Pollyanna optimism. Reproductive delinquency is biological and basic.'
And he adds that 'nobody knows just how far the average IQ in this
country (the USA) has declined since 1916, when Terman attempted to
standardize the meaning of IQ 100."

In Phaedrus' opinion, the scientists who sit down and systematically
analyze the result of various studies and reach conclusions which they
KNOW will not be well received, must proclaim them honestly and
fearlessly nevertheless. Not to do so would be a crime against Truth and
another victory for the shadowy plotters behind the New World Order,
AKA Jewish global domination and our continued, collective enslavement.

Part 4

The joke of modern 'democracy'...

Aldous Huxley, Brave New World Revisited, 1958:

"In a capitalist democracy, such as the United States, [the entire
economic process] is controlled by what Professor C. Wright Mills has
called the 'Power Elite.' This Power Elite directly employs several
millions of the country's work force in its factories, offices and
stores, controls many mil­lions more by lending them the money to buy
its products and, through its ownership of the media of mass
communication, influences the thoughts, the feelings and the actions of
virtually everybody. To parody the words of Winston Churchill, never
have so many been manipulated so much by so few. We are far indeed from
Jefferson's ideal of a genuinely free society composed of a hierarchy of
self ­governing units - 'the elementary republics of the wards, the
county republics, the State republics and the Republic of the Union,
forming a gradation of authorities.'"

"We see, then, that modern technology has led to the con­centration of
economic and political power, and to the development of a society
controlled (ruthlessly in the total­itarian states, politely and
inconspicuously in the democ­racies) by Big Business and Big Government.
But societies are composed of individuals and are good only in so far
as they help individuals to realize their potentialities and to lead a
happy and fruitful life. How have individuals been affected by the
technological advances of recent years? Here is the answer to this
question given by a philosopher-psychiatrist, Dr Erich Fromm: 'Our
contemporary Western society, in spite of its material, intellectual and
political progress, is increasingly less conducive to mental health,
and tends to undermine the inner security, happiness, reason and the
capacity for love in the individual; it tends to turn him into an
automaton who pays for his human failure with increasing mental
sickness, and with despair hidden under a frantic drive for work and
so­-called pleasure.' "

Well, nothing much has changed in the intervening 50 years, we can
plainly see - save perhaps the intensity of this on-going manipulation.

Huxley correctly identifies that Big Government and Big Business are
working hand-in-hand in a manner that brings nothing but ill for the
broad mass of the population. Though purportedly working in OUR best
interests, it is increasingly clear, even to those of little perception,
that the government is doing quite the opposite and this outrageous
state of affairs has been the norm for very many decades. Yet every few
years, we shuffle like battery chickens into the polling booths in the
delusion that our wishes and needs count for anything. We are simply
rubber-stamping the authority of enemies who would happily throw our
children into the jaws of ravenous wolves if it served their purposes.
No one gets nominated for a shot at the presidency who isn't already
pre-approved for the post by Jewish-controlled entities. Every four years in November,
we will be presented with the usual choice: candidates who are slavishly
pro-Israel. Either way, WE
THE PEOPLE (for whom it's all supposed to be about) LOSE. Our democracy
has been stolen. We get the last word; the final say; but it's
meaningless because whoever wins, it's only ever another sock-puppet of
Israel - then it's swiftly back to business as usual.

Part 5

Aldous Huxley, 1958:

"No people that passes abruptly from a state of subservience under the
rule of a despot to the completely unfamiliar state of political
independence can be said to have a fair chance of making democratic
institutions work. Again, no people in a precarious economic condition
has a fair chance of being able to govern itself democratically. [true
freedom] flourishes in an atmosphere of prosperity and declines as
declining prosperity makes it necessary for the government to intervene
ever more frequently and drastically in the affairs of its subjects.
Overpopulation and over-organization are two conditions which, as I have
already pointed out, deprive a society of a fair chance of making
democratic institutions work effectively. We see, then, that there are
certain historical, economic, demographic and technological conditions
which make it very hard for Jefferson's rational animals, endowed by
nature with inalienable rights and an innate sense of justice, to
exercise their reason, claim their rights and act justly within a
democratically organized society. We in the West have been supremely
fortunate in having been given our fair chance of making the great
experiment in self-government. Unfortunately it now looks as though,
owing to recent changes in our circumstances, this infinitely precious
fair chance were being, little by little, taken away from us. And this,
of course, is not the whole story. These blind impersonal forces are not
the only enemies of individual liberty and democratic institutions.
There are also forces of another, less abstract character, forces that
can be deliberately used by power-seeking individuals whose aim is to
establish partial or complete control over their fellows. Fifty years
ago, when I was a boy, it seemed completely self-evident that the bad
old days were over, that torture and massacre, slavery, and the
persecution of heretics, were things of the past. Among people who wore
top hats, traveled in trains, and took a bath every morning such horrors
were simply out of the question. After all we were living in the
twentieth century. A few years later these people who took daily baths
and went to church in top hats were committing atrocities on a scale
undreamed of by the benighted Africans and Asiatics. In the light of
recent history it would be foolish to suppose that this sort of thing
cannot happen again. It can and, no doubt, it will. But in the immediate
future there is some reason to believe that the punitive methods of
I984 will give place to the reinforcements and manipulations of Brave
New World."

Huxley initially points out that democracy as it once was, in the long
golden period following Independence in 1776, delivered the goods. The
monolithic tenants of the Constitution had only recently been formulated
and were at that time entirely safe from the kind of revisions and
attacks from Jewish shyster lawyers for whom the sight of a successful,
prosperous and peaceful country was to become simply unacceptable.

Hard working European people, their strong, principled leaders and 24
karat gold governance based on openness, integrity, free speech,
individual liberty and carefully-drafted legal framework guaranteed the
stunning success of young America. It swiftly rose to become the world's
richest and most powerful country thanks entirely to the vision of the
founding fathers and the hard work, honesty and enterprise of the
northern European settlers who built a paradise on earth the like of
which the world had never before seen.

Obviously, we all know what has happened since and who exactly it is
that is responsible for our collective demise. Huxley in his day
correctly predicted that the age of the 'social engineer' was about to
commence. Out of the two great dystopian paths, it was more likely that
in the drive to gain total control of the masses, the forces of darkness
would opt for subtle mind-manipulation rather than outright physical
brutality. And for many decades, this was indeed the way of things.

However, whilst social engineering (such as political-correctness and
massive immigration, the encouragement of inter-racial breeding and the
destruction of the family unit (and through this, society as a whole)
have been the core techniques for the implementation of these changes,
we have lately seen very much more ruthless methods coming into play
which if permitted to continue, will eventually see the infinitely more
menacing methodology of Nineteen Eighty-Four coming to fruition.

In fact we have already seen Orwellian developments growing at a pace -
since Washington's NeoConmen took the helm in 2000. Extraordinary
rendition, torture, pre-empitive strikes, the silencing of dissenting
voices, the massive increase in the prison population, the use of
agencies like the ATF and their sibling clone agencies to act as
stormtroopers against America's own citizens. The entire process is now
taking on a far more baleful dimension. Legislation is already on the
shelf which would - at a stroke - turn America into a clone of 1930s
Stalinist Russia. And all that is required is one single precipitating
event to bring this about...

We will not have long to wait, either. The trigger might be a genuine
external threat, it may be another false flag operation. Either which way, when it
happens (and it WILL - and soon) we will have our remaining (already
weakened) rights whisked away in the blink of an eye. What happens next
will not be pretty. Untold thousands of good men will die and our lives
will never be the same again. Our freedoms will be history - at least
for a while - and if we do not prevail, our children and their children
will be slaves in perpetuity.

But you know what? Maybe we deserve such a future, for we did NOTHING to
nip this situation in the bud when the possibility to seize our country
back without bloodshed was within our grasp. Now it's probably too
late, without considerable loss of life, to do so. Our collective
inaction means that when the day of reckoning comes, we'll have a FAR
higher price to pay because we didn't act at the outset. it all points
to an unavoidable blood bath in which very many of us will perish. Such
is the price of early inaction.

Part 6

Aldous Huxley writing in 'Brave New World Revisited.'

"Jefferson said: 'If a nation expects to be ignorant and free it expects what never was and never will be ... The people cannot be
safe without information. Where the press is free, and every man able to
read, all is safe.'"

He continues:

"Across the Atlantic another passionate believer in reason was thinking,
about the same time, in almost precisely similar terms. Here is what
John Stuart Mill wrote of his father, the utilitarian philo­sopher,
James Mill: 'So complete was his reliance upon the influence of reason
over the minds of mankind, whenever it is [attention-grabbing]
distractions of the most fascinating nature are deliberately used as
instruments of policy, for the purpose of preventing people from paying
too much attention to the realities of the social and political
situation."

"The other world of religion is different from the other world of
entertainment; but they still resemble one another in being most
decidedly 'not of this world'. Both are distractions and, if lived in
too continuously, both can become, in Marx's phrase, 'the opium of the
people' and so a threat to freedom. Only the vigilant can maintain their
liberties, and only those who are constantly and intelligently on the
spot can hope to govern themselves effectively by democratic procedures."

"A society, most of whose members spend a great part of their time not
on the spot, not here and now and in the calculable future, but
somewhere else, in the irrelevant other worlds of sport and soap opera,
of mythology and metaphysical fantasy, will find it hard to resist the
encroachments of those who would manipulate and control it."

Consider for a moment the incisive nature and power of this simple
observation. Huxley at once within one and the same sentence correctly
identifies the fundamental reasons behind the way we live today: a
disingenuous, Jew-controlled media, an utterly corrupted government, and
the masses of idle, ignorant, gullible propaganda-consumers.

Thankfully, you and I, are not among this class of the
intellectually impoverished. We have awoken to the threats that surround
us. We are wise to the motivations of those behind it. It is our DUTY
to ensure everyone else is likewise made aware of exactly what has been
going on now for many decades. The only 'free press' today is the
Internet. Out the Liars and murderers! To hell with them! Expose them
all!

Part 7

Aldous Huxley, 1958:

"Mass communication, in a word, is neither good nor bad; it is simply a
force and, like any other force, it can be used either well or ill. Used
in one way, the press, the radio and the cinema are indispensable to
the survival of democracy. Used in another way, they are among the most
powerful weapons in the dictator's armory. In the field of mass
communications as in almost every other field of enterprise,
technological progress has hurt the Little Man and helped the Big Man.
As lately as [1910], every democratic country could boast of a great
number of small journals and local newspapers. Thousands of country
editors expressed thousands of independent opinions. Somewhere or other
almost anybody could get almost anything printed."

"Today the press is still legally free; but most of the little papers
have disappeared. The cost of wood-pulp, of modern printing machinery
and of syndicated news is too high for the Little Man. In the
totalitarian East there is political censorship, and the media of mass
communication are controlled by the State. In the democratic West there
is economic censorship and the media of mass communication are
controlled by members of the Power Elite. Censorship by rising costs and
concentration of communication-power in the hands of a few big concerns
is less objectionable than State ownership and government propaganda;
but certainly it is not something of which a Jeffersonian democrat could
possibly approve."

"In regard to propaganda, the early advocates of universal literacy and a
free press envisaged only two possibilities: the propaganda might be
true, or it might be false. They did not foresee what in fact has
happened, above all in our Western capitalist democracies - the
development of a vast mass communications industry, concerned in the
main neither with the true nor the false, but with the unreal, the more
or less totally irrelevant. In a word, they failed to take into account
man's almost infinite appetite for distractions."

Here we are, half a century on and this situation has, as one might
reasonably expect, grown worse still. There was always some element of
propaganda in Western media, even pre-Huxley, but it was nothing as
remotely unremitting and omnipresent as it is today. Governments and
large media organizations (increasingly one and the same entity) could
have used their influence to bring about a better society, but they
chose, by accident or design, to do the opposite. And the only place
where genuine freedom of expression yet survives in on the Internet -
and that may not be for very much longer if the powers that be have
their way.

The media of today serves - almost without exception - the interests of
'Big Business' with its free trade and globalization agenda; selling out
the interests of hard-working people for the VAST self-enrichment of
what Huxley calls the 'Power Elite'. Eye-wateringly large sums are made
by big business interests which have asset-stripped this
nation and others on an epic scale. The demise of the manufacturing
heartlands of the northern midwest attest to this. Ruin, decay, family
breakdown, drugs and crime have replaced ordered and prosperous
communities. This is all solely due to the Jews' internationalist,
borderless world where decent Americans are forced to compete with
Chinese peasants and the like who sell their labor for little more than a
bowl of rice a day.

The advertising element of the popular media has gotten totally out of
control, too. Rather than satisfying consumers' genuine needs and
desires as was once the case, it has become a dragon of a business model
that festers on our worst fears and anxieties. We no longer buy useful
products or services because we NEED them, we buy junk, mass-produced
garbage by the shed-load in order to prove to our friends and neighbors
that we're 'doing well' and have a 'comfortable lifestyle.' Every
advertisement screams out to us that we're missing out on something; if
we don't constantly and wantonly consume, there must be something
fundamentally wrong in our lives.

Advertising media attempts to make us feel rotten and inadequate and
instills in us a a sense of permanent dissatisfaction with every aspect
of our existence. The impetus from this form of madness comes from the
craven greed of a race of beings who can NEVER have enough and don't
care what damage they do in going after it. The American dream was never
about having a driveway stuffed full of sports utility vehicles. It was
never about having a glamor model for a wife. It was never about taking
4 holidays a year. It was never about having a widescreen TV in every
room spewing out its garbage. It was never about so much stuff that the
Jews have convinced us, through their stranglehold over the mass media,
is what we should be striving for.

If we could only break away from this madness, en-masse, and adopt the
kind of lifestyle advocated by the likes of Emerson and Thoreau, the
Tribe of Satan would be out of business in a flash. They'd never make a
single cent out of us, just as they can't make a penny out of the Amish
community. Maybe one day soon when the dollar collapses to Absolute Zero
and folks wake up to the reality of the lies, the distortions, the
fraud and deceit that's been perpetrated against us for decades,
there'll come a realization that all the junk that the Jews told us was
so desirable and indispensable wasn't worth jack. Then perhaps we can
re-establish this broken, fucked-up society along decent lines. Until
that happy day, keep those guns oiled.

Part 8

In Part 7, we were able to see how blanket control over the media had
enabled the Jews to become the only game in town when it came to
dissemination of information and that the alphabet soup of TV channels
on offer that suggest the availability of free choice is simply an
illusion. Virtually ALL the networks are pushing forward the NWO agenda
by promoting the idea that free-trade, globalization and mass movements
of peoples between countries is a Good Thing which brings jobs and
prosperity. And whilst we dive headlong into embracing this cultural
suicide, the really big gainers, as always, are the Jews. By acting as
intermediaries, agents and obstacles between parties in international
trade (a core business of this parasite going back Millenia) they can
ALWAYS make a good living, regardless of how impoverished those poor
fools competing for ever worsening living standards consequently become.

Huxley, 1958:

"In the West, democratic principles are proclaimed and many able and
conscientious publicists do their best to supply electors with adequate
information and to persuade them, by rational argument, to make
realistic choices in the light of that information. All this is greatly
to the good. But unfortunately propaganda in the Western democracies
above all in America, has two faces and a divided personality. In charge
of the editorial department there is often a democratic Dr Jekyll - a
propagandist who would be very happy to prove that John Dewey had been
right about the ability of human nature to respond to truth and reason.
But this worthy man controls only a part of the machinery of mass
communication."

"In charge of advertising we find an anti-democrat because
anti-rational, Mr Hyde - or rather a Doctor Hyde, for Hyde is now a
Ph.D. in psychology and has a master's degree as well in the Social
Sciences. This Dr Hyde would be very unhappy indeed if everybody always
lived up to John Dewey's faith in human nature. Truth and reason are
Jekyll's affairs, not his . Hyde is a Motivation Analyst, and his
business is to study human weaknesses and failings, to investigate those
un­conscious desires and fears by which so much of men's conscious
thinking and overt doing is determined. And he does this, not in the
spirit of the moralist who would like to make people better, or of the
physician who would like to improve health, but simply in order to find
out the best way to take advantage of their ignorance and to exploit
their irrationality for the pecuniary benefit of his employers."

Here again, Huxley re-affirms his conviction that the mass media is
working AGAINST the best interests of the people. His 'Dr. Hyde'
character is alive and with us in the West today, too. Yet since we are
now 50 years down the road from when Huxley penned his observations, the
new Dr. Hyde of today has infinitely more techniques for deception in
his armory. Fifty years of endless studies into what makes people tick
in the most microscopic areas of their lives has yielded hundreds of
thousands of documents and reports detailing every gleanable fact from
the human psyche and how it may be ruthlessly and cynically manipulated
to ensure that the naked greed of the Jew is to some extent at least
satiated. And all this goes on with the full backing of Western
governments, the leaders of which have become phenomenally wealthy for
their tacit assistance in selling out the true interests of the people.
So much for 'democracy.' So much for 'public service.'

Part 9

Aldous Huxley, 50 years ago in Brave New World Revisited:

"...That a dictator could, if he so desired, make use of [certain
psychotropic chemicals] for political purposes is obvious. He could
ensure himself against political unrest by changing the chemistry of his
subjects' brains and so making them content with their servile
conditions. He could use tranquillizers to calm the excited, stimulants
to arouse enthusiasm in the indifferent, hallucinants to distract the
attention of the wretched from their miseries."

"But how, it may be asked, will the dictator get his subjects to take
the pills that will make them think, feel and behave in the ways he
finds desirable? In all probability it will be enough merely to make the
pills available. Today alcohol and tobacco are available, and people
spend considerably more on these very unsatisfactory euphorics,
pseudo­stimulants and sedatives than they are ready to spend on the
education of their children."

We now know from secret experimental data released by Russia following a
series of experiments carried out in the 1960s that adding fluoride to water supplies in concentrations of as little as 1ppm induces in
subjects enhanced levels of susceptibility and compliance - a very
useful tool indeed for any wayward government. Our so-called 'leaders'
are still toying with the idea of introducing it into our drinking water
on the grounds of improving dental health, notwithstanding that its
psychotropic effects are becoming increasingly known.

So the big question is: could the dental health motive have been a mere
pretext all along? Given that the discussion over fluoride remains
on-going long after its mind-altering properties have been publicized,
it seems quite likely. If there is one thing Huxley told us that we must
never forget it is that our real enemies in the West are our
governments. They are infinitely more dangerous to us than all the
world's disparate terrorist groupings put together. Do we really know
what they're injecting our kids with? Could there be more to it than
simple vaccination?

Part 10

In this extract, Huxley addresses one of the Biggest Lies of the 20th Century - that all men are created equal.

Aldous Huxley, 1958:

"...The orgy of spying, lynching and judicial murder, which these wrong
views about magic made logical and mandatory, was not matched until our
own days, when the Communist ethic, based upon erroneous views about
race, commanded and justified atrocities on an even greater scale.
Consequences hardly less undesirable are likely to follow the general
adoption of a Social Ethic, based upon the erroneous view that ours is a
fully social species, that human infants are born uniform and that
individuals are the product of conditioning by and within the collective
environment. If these views were correct, if human beings were in fact
the members of a truly social species, and if their individual
differences were trifling and could be completely ironed out by
appropriate conditioning, then, obviously, there would be no need for
liberty and the State would be justified in persecuting the heretics who
demanded it..."

Here the esteemed writer and visionary takes a distinct swipe against
the founders of the United Nations. We have only this (presumably
censored) Jewish version of his words from Random House Publishing to go
by, but nevertheless it clear that Huxley had no time at all for
Communist dogma and rounded repudiated it. It is only sad that we cannot
study his original manuscript, for it is highly likely that he would
have spelled out in no uncertain terms the inferior forms of life to
which he merely alludes here in this 'sanitized version' - for it was
written many years prior to the advent of political-correctness and has
presumably been 'cleaned up' to avoid offense.

Part 11

Aldous Huxley, 1958:

"Is individual freedom compatible with a high degree of individual
suggestibility? Can democratic institutions survive the subversion from
within of skilled mind-manipulators trained in the science and art of
exploiting the suggestibility both of individuals and of crowds? To what extent can the inborn tendency to be too suggestible for one's own good or the good of a democratic society be neutralized by education?"

Critical questions indeed! To anyone listlessly surveying our
contemporary scene of a half century later, it must appear at first
sight that the battle for free thought and independent Will has already
been lost. Such vast numbers of people appear to have permanently
succumbed to the barrage of incessant propaganda that has crashed
through our lives for so many decades. The masses really do appear to be
completely brainwashed. However, we shall see that this bleak
assessment is overly pessimistic by some considerable measure - thank
God!

In Phaedrus' very extensive personal experience, the Politically-Correct
quickly have their erroneous paradigm of the world shattered for good
once confronted with the bare and unadulterated FACTS. The reason for
this is that Politically-Correct dogma is grounded in falsehoods. It is a
CONTRIVANCE. It is unable to stand up to any level of scrutiny and
reason and quickly crumbles to pieces in the face of it. Thanking God, I
can honestly state here that of the scores of persons I have confronted
one-to-one personally, NOT A SINGLE ONE has left my presence still
clinging to their former ideological baggage. NOT ONE!

It is remarkable but true. Notwithstanding the decades of non-stop
propaganda through every conceivable Jewish-controlled medium both overt
and subliminal; notwithstanding indoctrination by left-wing libertine
perverts in our schools; notwithstanding lectures from appointees in our
local and national government - notwithstanding all of this, the dogma
of the United Nations, the politically-correct and the social engineers
for all their exquisite research and ingenuity - for all that - the
depth of penetration of this poisonous mindset on the average citizen is
is little more than skin deep and as fragile as an eggshell!

I propose to go no further in this article to explain my favored
technique for getting people to see sense as it
is off-topic for this discussion on Huxley. Suffice it say here, that
propaganda alone, unassisted by drugs, has never permanently damaged
anyone's thinking beyond repair. Give me no more than one hour with 80%
of people and I'll easily have them unplugged from the Matrix. But
having said that, complacency will kill us. Though it IS a simple matter
to free the minds of the people, this is dependent on us REACHING them
in mass numbers. Until and unless we can get that vital message out, we
still remain at grave risk of the permanent, blind enslavement Huxley
foresaw:

"The nature of psychological compulsion is such that those who act under
constraint remain under the impression that they are acting on their
own initiative. The victim of mind-manipulation does not know that he is
a victim. To him, the walls of his prison are invisible, and he
believes himself to be free. That he is not free is apparent only to
other people. His servitude is strictly objective." - AH.

Part 12

Aldous Huxley:

"Under the relentless thrust of accelerating overpopulation and
increas­ing over-organization, and by means of ever more effective
methods of mind-manipulation, the democracies will change their nature;
the quaint old forms - elections, parliaments, Supreme Courts and all
the rest - will remain. The underlying substance will be a new kind of
non-violent totalitarianism. All the traditional names, all the hallowed
slogans will remain exactly what they were in the good old days.
Democracy and freedom will be the theme of every broadcast and editorial
­but democracy and freedom in a strictly Pickwickian sense. Meanwhile
the ruling oligarchy and its highly trained elite of soldiers,
policemen, thought-manufacturers and mind-­manipulators will quietly run
the show as they see fit."

Once again, time has proved the great visionary spot-on. The maintenance
of these 'props of democracy' is simply a sham which purports to confer
some legitimacy to what is wholly illegitimate. The US and many other
Western countries are run on behalf of, and in the interests of, World
Jewry. However it may appear and whatever our so-called 'leaders' tell
us, that is what is ultimately behind the elaborate charade that
democracy has become. The interests of you and me and our people count
for nothing. We're just here to be taxed and to furnish them substance.
Our so-called 'leaders' make promises they never keep just to get
elected. Once elected, they get back to serving their true masters for
their own naked self-enrichment and aggrandizement - and the rest of us
can go to hell in a handbasket:

"How can we control the vast impersonal forces that now menace our
hard-won freedoms? On the verbal level and in general terms, the
question may be answered with the utmost ease. Consider the problem of
overpopulation. Rapidly mounting human numbers are pressing ever more
heavily on natural resources. What is to be done? Obviously we must,
with all possible speed, reduce the birth rate to the point where it
does not exceed the death rate. At the same time we must, with all
possible speed, increase food production, we must institute and
implement a world-wide policy for conserving our soils and our forests,
we must develop practical substitutes, preferably less dangerous and
less rapidly exhaustible than uranium, for our present fuels; and, while
husbanding our dwindling resources of easily available minerals, we
must work out new and not too costly methods for extracting these
minerals from ever poorer and poorer ores - the poorest ore of all being
sea water. But all this, needless to say, is almost infinitely easier
said than done. The annual increase of numbers should be reduced. But
how? We are given two choices - famine, pestilence and war on the one
hand, birth control on the other"

Of course the overpopulation problem has grown very much worse since
Huxley wrote these words fifty years ago. A population reduction in the
order of perhaps as much as 80% is now required. That's BILLIONS of
people we're talking about. And this is what the agents of the NWO are
secretively working towards. Clearly they're not interested in Huxley's
birth control solution, as the flagrant encouragement of casual free sex
and racial interbreeding in the popular media attests. That leaves us
with famine, pestilence and war. No big surprise here! For a race of
people that has always found the stench of rotting goyim flesh
appealing, I think we could have seen it coming.

Phaedrus does not wish to appear like some Bible-thumping religious nut,
but there is something disturbingly similar between Judaism and
Satanism. Harold Rosenthal breezily admitted over 30 years ago (somewhat
ill-advisedly in hindsight given the advent of the Internet) that the
God of the Jews is actually Lucifer. When we see the works of these
people given free reign, as in Palestine, it isn't difficult to form the
view that there's something distinctly evil about them and their
mindset. How the hell we permit such entities to have vast and
over-arching influence in our day-to-day lives is one of world's great
mysteries. THEY MUST BE STOPPED BEFORE THEY KILL US ALL.

Part 13

From Brave New World Revisited, 1958:

"In practice, as recent history has repeatedly shown, the right to vote,
by itself, is no guarantee of liberty. Therefore, if you wish to avoid
dictatorship by plebiscite, break up modern society's vast, machine-like
collectives into self-governing, voluntarily co-operating groups,
capable of functioning outside the bureaucratic systems of Big Business
and Big Government. Overpopulation and over-organization have produced
the modern metropolis, in which a fully human life of multiple personal
relationships has become almost impossible. Therefore, if you wish to
avoid the spiritual impoverishment of individuals and whole societies,
leave the metropolis and revive the small country community, or
alternatively humanize the metropolis by creating within its network of
mechanical organizations the urban equivalents of small country
communities, in which individuals can meet and co-operate as complete
persons, not as the mere embodiments of specialized functions."

Note here that even in the America of the late 1950s, the author was
already deeply suspicious of democracy and how it could be subverted by
the interests of Big Business. We tend to look back misty-eyed on that
seemingly halcyon era from our present standpoint and see it as the
golden age of liberty, but it is evident from Huxley's concerns that it
was already under threat. My personal belief is that the origins of this
erosion of our freedoms had its seeds in our accepting large numbers of
Jews fleeing the Nazis from 1930's Europe. Something seems to have
happened within a few years of the ending of WWII that vastly
accelerated the cultural decline that had been simmering away since the
1920s when the numbers of Jews in positions of public influence
(Hollywood excepted) was much lower.

The Jews we were foolishly good-hearted enough to welcome to our shores
repaid our kindness by proceeding to gnaw away at this once-great
country from the inside. They quickly wriggled their way into powerful
positions of public influence and seized control of the mass media, and
by so doing, the government itself. They enriched themselves at our
expense and funneled huge amounts of our tax-dollars to that cancerous,
running sore of the Middle East, Israel. Additionally, their appetite
for blood had to be satiated by the sacrifice of great numbers of our
young people in fighting foreign adventures that were of no benefit to
us whatsoever. But with their guile, their determination and their
self-belief in their "entitlement" to call all the shots, they somehow
got away with it – and still do.

I can almost hear the call of every great civilization in history crying
out to America in the late 1930: "Please, please, don't let these
Devils in! Afford them no sanctuary! They may look like you and talk
like you - they're very good at that - but they're evil! You let them
into your great country and within 100 years it'll be nothing but a
rotting corpse. These parasites will have eaten away everything you have
worked for and totally destroyed your wealth, your way of life and
cultural heritage. We beg you from our bitter experience of 3,000 years
of dealings with these nomadic parasites,
for if you fail, then in time they will lay your country waste! Take
heed, America! Take heed!"

Pity we couldn't hear them.

Part 14

Aldous Huxley:

"'Free as a bird', we say, and envy the winged creatures for their power
of unrestricted movement in all the three dimensions. But, alas, we
forget the dodo. Any bird that has learned how to grub up a good living
without being compelled to use its wings will soon renounce the
privilege of flight and remain forever grounded. Something analogous is
true of human beings. If the bread is supplied regularly and copiously
three times a day, many of them will be perfectly content to live by
bread alone - or at least by bread and circuses alone. 'In the end',
says the Grand Inquisitor in Dostoevsky's parable, 'in the end they will
lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, "Make us your slaves, but
feed us.'"

Isn't this closely analagous to the situation we find ourselves in
today? In this couch-potato society, it certainly strikes Phaedrus that
way. Though we expect rather more from life than just bread three times a
day, it isn't THAT much more. The vast majority of people in the West
constitute little more than a mindless peasant underclass that has
resigned itself to the treadmill of daily life. People work for 50 years
just to put food on the table and keep a roof over their heads, from
what little they have left after the ravages of direct and indirect
taxation and Jewish investment frauds like pension schemes.

Throughout history, it has regrettably proven to be the case that the
peasants - in whichever country - will undergo the most dire privations
at the hands of their exploitative masters before they are driven into
taking effective action to overthrow the tyranny and oppression from
which they suffer. They can be ground down by decades of maltreatment
and forced almost to the point of starvation before they will rise up
and overturn the established order of things. So the situation we find
ourselves in today is entirely of our own collective making. We have
what we deserve.

Of course this despairing assessment isn't the whole story. We have a
peasantry of so many hundreds of millions of people in the West because
the common people are kept in the dark as to their true potential by the
omnipresent, Jew-controlled media which is keen to foster in them the
idea that the status quo is beyond question and it's simply the way
things are and have always been. This is the vital importance of
'entertainment' in the modern world. Every single minute we spend
watching some trashy TV soap or reading some garbage newspaper is a
minute taxed from our lives. It is a minute during which we simply do
not question why the world is in such a dreadful mess and who is
responsible for it.

The mainstream jewsmedia performs the role of the rodeo clown with
impeccable aplomb. TV networks have developed highly successful
techniques for ensuring that once we are watching a channel, we will
continue to do so for far longer than we had intended and for far longer
than is good for us. They've moved on quite a bit since the days of
'Don't touch that dial!' And all the while we are gawping at their
mind-rotting drivel, the Jews know we are no threat to them. If we are
ever to liberate our peasant classes from their servitude of the Jew and
Jewish interests, then we must find a way to break the media's hold
over enough of them for the bulk to follow. In short, we need to work
towards achieving a critical mass of Jew-awareness.

Part 15

Brave New World Revisited, 1958:

"We see, then, that the disease of over-organization has been clearly
recognized, that various comprehensive remedies have been prescribed and
that experimental treatments of symptoms have been attempted here and
there, often with considerable success. And yet, in spite of all this
preaching and this exemplary practice, the disease grows steadily worse."

"We know that it is unsafe to allow power to be concentrated in the hands
of a ruling oligarchy; nevertheless power is in fact being concentrated
in fewer and fewer hands. We know that, for most people, life in a huge
modern city is anonymous, atomic, less than fully human; nevertheless
the huge cities grow steadily huger and the pattern of urban-industrial
living remains unchanged. We know that, in a very large complex society,
democracy is almost meaningless except in relation to autonomous groups
of manageable size; nevertheless more and more of every nation's
affairs are managed by the bureaucrats of Big Government and Big
Business. It is only too evident that, in practice, the problem of
over-organization is almost as hard to solve as the problem of
overpopulation. In both cases we know what ought to be done; but in
neither case have we been able, as yet, to act effectively upon our
knowledge."

This situation of over-organization to which Huxley constantly returns
during the course of his work is no accident, but has in fact arisen by
design. Organizational complexity is an absolute NECESSITY for the Jew
to carry out his plans; his machinations would be readily exposed
without it. One thing Jews hate above all else is EXPOSURE. Hitler put
it almost poetically in Mein Kampf. The exact quote - though quite well
known - eludes me at present, but suffice it to say that it perfectly
describes how the Jews desire as many walls of opacity to work behind as
they can possibly erect. So the more complex and confusing our world
is, all the better for them to work their evil against us. This is one
of the primary driving forces behind the advent of Big Government, which
the Jews are always so keen to promote (at OUR expense of course).

Things have since unfortunately deteriorated beyond the point where the
author's proposed solution would be of any help to us. It was a
constructive suggestion 50 years ago perhaps, but is no longer
applicable. We didn't take the necessary action when we should have. Our
parents let us down just as we are now letting our own children down;
consigning them to a life of slavery as a result of our indolence and
apathy. For it is undeniably true that "an ounce of prevention is better
than a pound of cure" - it's less messy for one thing. We didn't make
the effort in prevention, so our only remaining option now is to CURE
and that will be a much uglier job.

I believe it's fitting at this point to conclude this section with an apposite quote from Winston Churchill:

"If you draft 10,000 regulations, you destroy all respect for the law."

Too many laws, too much complexity. What are we going to do about it?

Part 16

This, the final part of our examination of the key points arising out of
Huxley's dire prediction of the future contains a vital warning message
for us all. Calling out to us from a half a century ago, the great
visionary wrote:

"The methods employed by orthodox educators were and still are extremely
inefficient. Under a scientific dictator education will really work -
with the result that most men and women will grow up to love their
servitude and will never dream of revolution. There seems to be no good
reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be
overthrown."

"Meanwhile there is still freedom left in the world. Many young people,
it is true, do not seem to value freedom. But some of us still believe
that, without freedom, human beings cannot become fully human and that
freedom is therefore supremely valuable. Perhaps the forces that now
menace freedom are too strong to be resisted for very long. It is still
our duty to do whatever we can to resist them them."

But sadly we haven't. Everything that makes us what we are has been and
continues to be spirited away from us little by little. Over 50 years after
Huxley's strident warning, we've continued to permit this situation to
develop through our indifference and collective apathy. We've been too
preoccupied - as Huxley observed - with our "endless appetite for
distractions" - which actress has the biggest tits; Britney
Spears' antics, the NFL rankings, blockbuster movies, must-have gadgets,
Beyonce's ass, Gerry Springer and Oprah Winfrey. We've been
hypnotized by all these media rodeo clowns while the Zionist bull was
busy trashing our cultural china shop.

Our enemies, that is to say, the traitors who make our laws and broker
deals with foreign powers behind our backs; who sell our liberties and
hard-fought freedoms for 30 pieces of Jewish silver are all part of the
same poison pot, to wit: newspaper proprietors, magazine editors, TV
studio executives, movie producers, advertising agents, talk-show hosts,
Marxists, internationalists, Jewish bankers, Senior Freemasons, CEOs of
global corporations and the One World Government in waiting: the
Bilderbergers, the Trilateralists, the CFRers, AIPAC and all the rest of
the lying, scheming, cheating scum.

There are some very smart people in the above list, however, make no
mistake about it. Whilst you and me have been drunkenly slurring in some
seedy bar over who the Red Sox's best ever pitcher was, the agents of
our destruction were slowly but surely drawing their plans against us
(to paraphrase Wells). They have researched with exquisite detail all
our foibles and failings. They are master manipulators par excellence.
If we continue with our blind indifference to our approaching fate, then
we'll have fully deserved it. Huxley's final conclusion in the lines
quoted above is:

"There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown."

Think about that stark assessment for a moment. It's perfectly correct.
Once they've finally got us, they've got us for keeps. Us, our children
and our children's children's children. They'll have completely
re-written history by then. As a people, we won't know who we are any
more. We'll be whatever THEY tell us we are. This revisionism - the only
kind permitted it seems - has ALREADY been underway in the West for
some time, as you may be aware. In due course we will become
irreversibly enslaved by these criminals for all time to come - just as
their 'holy' book foretells. As Huxley states, it simply won't occur to
our grandchildren to question their subservience, but even if they were
to, the Jews would have ALL the answers. I don't know about you, but as
far as this blogger is concerned, that's a prospect that's worth
fighting to the last drop of blood to prevent. I WILL NOT BETRAY MY
CULTURAL HERITAGE.

27 comments:

This essay was originally published in 2008. I have taken the liberty to slightly edit it, removing some references to current events in '08 and a few other minor edits in an attempt for clarity and timelessness. The original was from a now discontinued blog here:http://worldpeace-phaedrus.blogspot.com/

The essay is certainly politically incorrect, some would say racist or anti-semitic, but it is really only delving into taboo areas where we are told not to go.

Huxley is turning in his grave nearly 100 years after his visionary prophecies began to form into his own mode of fiction. He is one of my favorite authors and raised serious issues and made world-wide breakthroughs in the research of psychedelics as well as our cognitive liberties. I drew a portrait as homage to the man and his works. See the him roll with the mushrooms, the pills and the doors of perception at http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2010/07/aldous-huxley-rolls-in-his-grave.html

I'm enjoying this essay, although I'm not half through it, I had to throw down a comment of protest; "It swiftly rose to become the world's richest and most powerful country thanks entirely to the vision of the founding fathers and the hard work, honesty and enterprise of the northern European settlers who built a paradise on earth the like of which the world had never before seen."

I've heard that America became "the world's richest and most powerful country" thanks not entirely to "the vision of the founding fathers and the hard work, honesty and enterprise of the northern European settlers" but also (or perhaps nearly entirely) to the (primarily African) slave labor that was the engine of America before the industrial revolution.

As far as driving the economic engine of America during that time, you have a point. Since it was mainly the wealth producers who owned slaves then the economic percentage related to slavery would be significant.

I was part of a Bicentennial History project back in... well, back when. We tried to get hard numbers on the slave situation and by the end the word was, FORGET IT. The best numbers we have are that something less than 300K Americans ever owned a slave, the ones who did in any number were the exceptions that caused ALL the problems and (amazingly) also kept their fortunes after slavery was outlawed. No more than 5 percent of Americans ever owned slaves and that includes the Irish slaves who dug the canals in Ohio (often skipped in official accounts but even as a kid hiking on the Buckeye Trail I heard our old canals referred to as "Irish Graves", a bad joke already old in the 1840s). To get some nasty feedback, point out that regular Americans were 3-5 percent likely to own another human, but Jewish Americans were 40-60 percent likely to own slaves (and they treated the Irish ones worse.)

I don't expect this topic will ever be discussed rationally in the USA anyhow; I'd LIKE it to, but experience tells me no dice.

Hi Kenny,First, I heard recently - can't recall where - that the pilgrims' great success was mainly due to their landing in an area that was already developed, but devoid of people (due to serious plague). Millions of natives died some years before, but their gardens, ports, villages, etc., where still there. No land had to be cleared, etc. I have no idea if this is true - it would mean a very different history than the one I was taught.

Second, Huxley was of the favored bloodlines - he didn't "predict" this stuff, he was informed of the plan.

Third, we are being systematically eliminated. Below is a partial list. -EV

1)Chemicals/heavy metals in food2)Genetically engineered food3)Vaccines (by shot or now, engineered into mosquitoes) 4)Chemicals/heavy metals in cleaning products (dishwasher soap, washing machine soap, housecleaning products, etc.)5)Chemicals/heavy metals in makeup or other personal care items (deodorant, shampoo, lotions)6)Sunscreen (causes cancer and prevents your skin from making vitamin D out of sunlight)7)Electromagnetic radiation (cells phones, cordless phones, laptops, wifi, etc.)8)Radiation from nuclear fallout (Fukashima) – why were nuclear plants built on faultlines?9)Radiation from fracking activities (brings radioactive particles and heavy metals from below)10)Radiation from “depleted” uranium used in weaponry in wars around the world11)Radiation from medical/dental procedures12)Fluoridated water – in regular drinking supplies but also in water used to make the foods/drinks that we buy. 13)Floridated toothpaste (fluoride is toxic) or any toothpaste (containing glycerine, which prevents tooth mineralization)14)Dental fluoride treatments15)Amalgam mercury tooth fillings16)Root canals17)Oil spills polluting the oceans (most recent, the Gulf Oil Spill – corexit sprayed to disperse the oil has made the situation much worse)18)Chemtrail Spraying (heavy metals, biohazards)19)Absence of nutrients in food (due to soil depletion)20)Making vitamin/mineral supplements illegal, suppressing information about how they work and what diseases they can treat (e.g., heart disease is chronic scurvy)21)Making raw milk or other nutritious whole foods illegal to buy/sell22)Then, “for our safety,” it will be illegal to produce own food23)Lastly, it will become illegal to STORE any food

more:24)Discouraging breastfeeding – and failing to put the proper, brain-enhancing essential fatty acids in baby formula25)Pesticides (in food, on lawns) – pesticides are neurotoxins and the current culprit in bee-colony-collapse disorder26)Antibiotic overuse (in meats, also medical prescriptions)27)Medical prescriptions erode immune functioning and over 100,000 deaths/year28)BPA – lining of canned foods, in all types of plastics29)Malnutrition – due to absence of food or eating junk food30)Stress – due to economic problems or terror induced by the gov’t or whoever31)Nano-technology (in food, clothes, etc.)32)Genetically engineered viruses33)Outlawing known medical cures (for cancer, etc.), such as hemp34)Pushing NON-cures for diseases, such as cancer (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy); these non-cures are somehow the only ones insurance covers. (At a cure rate of only 3% for cancer, why has nothing changed in the past 40 years? What happened to all that funding for “research”?)35)HAARP – need I say more? Just research it if you’ve got no clue.36)The reduction or elimination of civil rights (freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of press) is very bad for your health! The NDAA is extremely bad – the gov’t can now just detain you forever or kill you, with no trial, no evidence, no charges.37)Make dissent illegal but first start with ridicule, making dissidents appear “crazy.” 38)Making sources of polluting energy artificially scarce, and simultaneously hiding sources of free energy that don’t pollute.39)Debt – mortgage, credit card, auto, etc.40)Consolidation of sources of money (central banks, credit/debit cards instead of cash) is also very bad for one’s health. 41)Education by the state – anything that feeds the kiddies lies while training them to obey authority and conform to norms is inherently unhealthy…which sounds an awful lot like…42)T.V. (definitely bad for health). Are we being "programmed" by the programs?43)Hiding the real history of our species – not bad for our health directly but indirectly; because if we knew, we’d be able to see everything else on this list for what it is – an attempt to destroy the human race, and we would take action accordingly. Memes can kill – like believing in “justice” after death, so you unquestioningly render unto “Caesar.”44)While we’re at it, WAR is decidedly bad for human health. It starts with subtle “divide-and-conquer” tactics, “us-vs-them” mentality.45)Microchipping – where we’re headed if we don’t fight – put everything on the chip (how ‘convenient’ -- medical records, atm cards, passports, drivers licenses) then ALL humans (not just a dissident here and there) are susceptible to manipulation/elimination.

Zionism is but a branch of Judaism and Jewish ideology, which is supremacist in nature and is the foundation for what is referred to as "The New World Order". I highly recommend Michael Collins Piper's book The New Babylon, which explains all this in spades. You can buy it online for $10 or so. Zionism, like Communism and plutocratic capitalism, is just a part of the Jewish Problem.

These so call 'Europeans' were also behaving exactly like what is being condemened and labeled/refered to in this essay as 'Jew'. The fact is these hailed 'European' immigrants acted just like 'pirates' so please drop the religious/racist implication of 'Jew'. These people were immigrants, from where ever, and no matter what race or religion, and they 'STOLE by way of FORCE' the American lands from the rightful owners. The indigoneous natives who had already been on the land for centuries. I say that ANY person who thinks that behavior is 'Ok' is a criminal/Pirate no matter religion or race and not to be praised for out right THEFT. The Powers That Be, aka the world wide 'Military Industrial Complex' that we were also warned about by Eisenhower in his 1961 farewell address before JFK took office are nothing more then 'Criminals in Power'. If you were to ask a well known indigeonous public speaker what he thought of this essay, I'd expect him to say something like, 'Welcome to the Res' http://www.republicoflakotah.com/2012/our-part-of-worldwide-wreakage/

An excellent article on the whole. I was never a huge fan of Huxley and his eugenic mentality, however Phaedrus has synthesized the vision of BNW astutely, especially concerning a certain "minority". He and Phaedrus however, make two fatal mistakes. One in lauding "democracy" in its purest form as an ideal. Democracy in all forms is merely a new form of control...not a representative form of fair governance. I wish people would understand this simple fact. He even quotes Jefferson's visions of a true CONSTITUTIONAL Republic...then goes on to sing the praises of a "democracy" gone wrong. Huxley bemoans the use of the controlled media as anti-democratic, when in fact it is part-and-parcel to the mob control inherent in this system. Democracy is 3 wolves and a sheep deciding what to have for lunch. It is mob rule. No room for the protection of individual freedom. All the jewish-owned press has to do is convince 51 percent of a Western society to agree to their evil designs, and the dictates of "democracy" are satisfied. They know this...it kicks the hell outta communism(what they were used to).And two, the "biologically poorer quality" thing. Oh please. Haven't we gotten beyond that type of supremacist thinking? Don't we all agree that life is life? And all life is precious? Eugenics should be left to the Margaret Sangers...and yes, the JEWISH Eric Fromm(which he quotes in support).Other than these two points...a VERY good read. Thanks for posting this series!

I was hoping someone would pick up on the eugenics and race aspects and give some feedback.

Huxley's brother Julian was a leader in the early eugenics movement, among a wide variety of other interests, he's a whole story himself, and was a promoter of various forms of social control. Julian pushed programs and Aldous warned of the potentials. I've thought that they were a dialectic and the synthesis is what we're seeing today, control and some awareness of the control but fairly ineffective in doing anything about it. Julian and Aldous were not only brothers but on the same team.

Israeli Pilot Speaks Up on the USS Liberty False Flag AttackAn Israeli pilot approached Liberty survivors and then held extensive interviews with former Congressman Paul N. (Pete) McCloskey about his role. According to this senior Israeli lead pilot, he recognized the Liberty as American immediately, so informed his headquarters, and was told to ignore the American flag and continue his attack. He refused to do so and returned to base, where he was arrested.

He came from a connected family and was actually one of the predictive programmers set in place to prepare mankind for the abuse mankind would face at the hand (and will) of the Illuminati/Rothschild/''Master Race''.

He was more an insider, like George Orwell and Carrol Quigley, who also gave the public a glimpse of THE NEW WORLD ORDER, in their writings. The question remains, what side was Orwell and Huxley on, since they were both well connected?..I know that Huxley visited the 22 year old Ray Bradbury just after FAHRENHEIT 451 was published in Southern California, where Aldous Huxley also called home...Phillip K. Dick also gave us a portrayal of tomorrow's nwo is his great fictional tales....and he couldn't have been more disconnected throughout his marginal life, much like Van Gogh, he never experienced success during his lifetime..Consequently , he DEFINITELY was giving us a warning, much like Orwell in his ANIMAL FARM.....

How Dare I - Collected Essays On The Destructive Force Of Judaism

Les Visible - The Curious Tale of Ash and The Whine: A Novel of the Unnatural and Supernatural

Follow by Email

Subscribe To

Search This Blog

Translate

Just in case there is a misunderstanding - Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. in our efforts to identify humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.