The Anjuman Tarraqi Pasand Mussanafin-e-Hind or Progressive Writers' Movement (Urdu: ترقی پسند مصنفین تحریک‎, Hindi: अखिल भारतीय प्रगतिशील लेखक संघ) was a progressive literary movement in the pre-partition British India, consisting of a few different writers groups around the world.

The groups were anti-imperialistic and left-oriented, and sought to inspire people through their writings advocating equality and attacking social injustice and backwardness.

According to The Dawn, "Progressive Writers Movement in Urdu literature was the strongest movement after Sir Syed's education movement. The progressives contributed to Urdu literature some of the finest pieces of fiction and poetry. Undoubtedly, they were the trend-setters for the coming generation of writers, and their role cannot be denigrated or denied."[1]

Contents

The Indian Progressive Writers' Movement and Association first began after the publication of Angare (Burning Coals), a collection of short stories by Ahmed Ali, Sajjad Zaheer, Rashid Jehan and Mahmuduz Zafar in 1932 and its poscription by the British U. P. Government in 1933. A League of Progressive Authors, was first announced by Ahmed Ali and Mamuduz Zafar in The Leader of Allahabad dated April 5, 1933, which later expanded and became the Indian Progressive Writers' Association.

The Indian Progressive Writers' Association was set up in London in 1935.

The Progressive Writers' Association was set up in Kolkata in July 1936.

The All India Writers' Association was set up in Lucknow on 10 April 1936 under the leadership of Syed Sajjad Zahir and Ahmed Ali, Both of them invited Syed Fakhruddin Balley (known as BALLEY ALIG )to join. Syed Fakhruddin Balley then took start work to promote the Association. So many writers and poets were very happy on this joining like Hameed Akhtar, Faiz Ahmad Faiz, Ahmad Nadeem Qasmi, Saadat Hasan Manto to Ismat Chughtai and Sajjad Zaheer.

The All Pakistan Progressive Writers Association was set up in Pakistan in December 1947.

The partition of the sub-continent also portioned the movement and with the sway of the Macarthyism in the USA, the movement was declared illegal in 1954 in Pakistan is the martial law of 1958 saw its rank and file working under different banners 'Awam Adbi Anjuman' was revised during the PPP Government in 1971. Rafiq Chaudry, Shaukat Siddiqui, Hassan Abdi, Ateeq Ahmad, and Hameed Kashmiri had their support however, in 2007 it was organised on a countrywide basis under an interim constitution. During this period Hameed Akhter and Rahat Saeed, worked very hard and organised general body meeting in Lahore in 2012 to elect another team of office-bearers with a mandate to get its new constitution passed in a few months time on March 4, 2012. Dr Mohammad Ali Siddiqui was elected its new President unopposed, Salim Raz was elected its Secretary General, Rasheed Misbah, its Deputy Secretary General, Dr Qazi Abid its joint secretary and Maqsood Khaliq its deputy secretary co-ordinator. Soon after the election South African Free Media Association (SAFMA) invited the new office-bearers at the dinner presided over by Munno Bhai, Dr Siddiqui, newly elected president of PWA, Rahat Saeed, the outgoing Acting Secretary General were the guest of honour. Replying to Imtiaz Alam of SAFMA's question as to what challenges the PWA of today considered relevant, as the previous contention of the PWA the battle of ideas had become irrelevant, the newly elected president PWA contended that the battle of ideas are still going on. And how could it be considered a closed chapter when a few hundred multinationals in the world had their coffers 50 percent of the world's GDP. He thought that in Pakistan the rate of poverty was rising alarmingly and even if the rate of illiteracy as a yardstick of poverty is taken into account more than 50 percent people were literate. Another fact to be taken into account is that the postmodern approach which rejected, foundationalism, realism and humanism as the determinants of knowledge is the consequential rejection of knowledge. How could the Progressive be thrown out as a view point when the plurality point of view was being preached? Had the post-modernist not cancelled[clarification needed]