Judging from the reports posted by Peter Chattaway, Scott must be in an Old Testament mood: He’s also signed on to produce a movie about King David. Interesting, to see a professing atheist becoming so interested in producing major Biblical epics.

The Old Testament was not written to be a photo-realistic historical documentation of events. It’s a book of stories crafted from, and inspired by, historical details to convey insights about how God has worked, and is still working, in history, leading us “further up, further in” to an understanding of his nature, his grace, and his love. And it was not included in the Biblical canon to equip Christians to deny the discoveries of science, or to give us examples that justify military action in God’s name It was included in the Biblical canon to show us what led up to Jesus’ arrival — the turning point of human history — and what made him so incredibly necessary, what he did that made”all things new.”

Any time someone tells a Bible story in their own words, they affect what it means. That’s because every element of a well-told story, like every element of a good poem, contributes to the meaning. And when we translate it or adapt it, words change, and thus nuances change, relationships change, and meaning changes. To varying degrees.

That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t adapt these stories. But it does mean we should attune ourselves to how stories mean, so that our storytelling reflects light in the way that the stories of the Bible do.

So let’s not bicker about “Biblical accuracy.” It’s more important to focus on how these adaptations of the stories interpret, reflect, or distort what these stories mean. Does the story reflect Truth (Capital “T”)? That’s far more important to me than whether or not it reflects truth (Lowercase “t’)… the practical details of an account.

I’m not getting my hopes up about Ridley Scott’s Exodus. Last year’s The Counselor was the first Ridley Scott movie I’ve really liked since, oh, Matchstick Men in 2003… and I haven’t really liked one of his ambitious epics since Blade Runner in 1981. He’s a great visual stylist, but he is too enamored of CGI, and he often works with mediocre screenplays. We’ll see.

One response to “The Prince of Egypt Returns…”

The Prince of Egypt is one of my all-time favorite animated films. Its characters are more realistically drawn (no pun intended) then most modern blockbusters; it’s a Bible story that never feels like a Bible Story.

This, on the other hand, I could take or leave–maybe it will be a decent rental.