Its a bit of an embarassment at this point...isnt part of rock and roll to die young?

Click to expand...

Its definitely a nostalgia act, but they seem to put on a good show. Given that they havent released a new record since 2005 (which was actually not too bad), and they never improv or expound on their songs to much, it'll probably be pretty rote, but I would hardly call them an embarrassment.

Its definitely a nostalgia act, but they seem to put on a good show. Given that they havent released a new record since 2005 (which was actually not too bad), and they never improv or expound on their songs to much, it'll probably be pretty rote, but I would hardly call them an embarrassment.

Click to expand...

Theyre not an embarassment musically, not at all. Maybe its ageism on my part but people shouldnt be up there after 30 IMO.

Theyre not an embarassment musically, not at all. Maybe its ageism on my part but people shouldnt be up there after 30 IMO.

Click to expand...

I get what you're saying, but I dont really agree anymore. I still think that older musicians can still tear it down. Most (nearly all) of the bands i listen to are over thirty. The fact that they can still be creative, exciting, and progressive, makes me completely forget their age.

I get what you're saying, but I dont really agree anymore. I still think that older musicians can still tear it down. Most (nearly all) of the bands i listen to are over thirty. The fact that they can still be creative, exciting, and progressive, makes me completely forget their age.

Click to expand...

thats the embarassing part, or what SHOULD be embarrassing to the younger rock stars...mick jagger will out-rock you at 60+....it sho Ild drive kids nuts but they dont give a shit.