Forum:The 2010 Top 10 Extravaganza is nearly here!

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Note: This topic has been unedited for 1517 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Riker, pondering the very best of 2010.

Ladies, gentlemen, IPs, trolls.

As it is traditional in the so called "world" out there, we shall soon be shutting down 2010. Permanently.

As it is customary by human nature, the creme de la creme of the past year must be announced, so the rest of us can bow our heads in shame and recognize that we are not as good as we thought.

Not in the slightest.

And so, Uncyclopedia will be proud to recognize, once again, the TOP 10 Articles of 2010 Which Did Not Suck As Bad As The Rest

And this is how it will happen:

On January 1st Mister Operandi will open the votage page for the Top 3 articles of December.

On January 15th(ish), Mister Operandi will open the TOP 10 votage page. This page will be available until Feb 1st. The list of the nominations for the top 10 of 2011 will be based on the top 3 of each month in 2010.

On Feb 1st, we give VFH a well deserved rest and we feature the top 10 of 2010 from number 10 onwards, until we reach number 1.

On Feb 11th we resume our normal scheduled program and we REJOICE, for we have been the worse, for yet another year.

And a little competition this year. Last year, POTR was kind enough to prepare the Top 10 template for 2009 ({{2009Top10}}). This year, I'm looking for a few suggestions for the new template to either take the style that was used in previous years, or use a brand new and exciting design that will muck up our entire database. Please look at the code for the previous year, there are some elements there that need to be present in this year in order to be displayed properly on the main page.

You've got to remember that we are just simple Uncyclopedians. These are people of the land. The common clay of the new West. You know... morons. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 23:19, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

I do? Why? I like living in this imaginary world where people can spik proprt... 1234~23:48, 21 December 2010

Oh, and I have a couple of serious inquires:

Each year the color of the ninjastar changes (2005 was an ugly yellow, 2006 was the normal silver, 2007 was the normal silver with two hands opening the hole, 2008 was this awesome red circle, and 2009 was a boring gold), so what will this years be? Or, if we want to keep this years top 10 as the gold ninjastar, should we go back to the 2005-2008 templates and change them to the gold star, too?

The 2009 template has the red "Top 10 of '09" featured under the logo, but the top 10 templates of 2005-2008 don't have anything of the sort. Would anyone want to go back and add it to the other templates as well?

Salamander wasn't in the top three of the month?!? A travesty of injustice. Where do I write it in (seriously, I don't know if a write-in is allowed or not, but if it is, Salamander) Aleister 13:15 4 1 '11

Oh wait, I thought this was articles that are in the running. Shame about all the above then; good articles all. --BlackFlamingo 13:40, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Hmmmm. Well you've got your whoring in through the backdoor. You mock us Sir. But I shall vote for your wretchedpage anyway, in anticipation of its grand misfortune. Aleister 13:46 4 1 '11