This is a prospective and comparative work between arterial pressure obtained through manual
measurement with aneroid sphygmomanometer and the arterial pressure obtained through automatic
monitor.
The practice was carried out in a group of 100 inpatients in the Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology
Service in the Consortium of the General Hospital of Valencia during the first term of 2007.
The development of this hospital training was made on each individual through sequential
measurements and executed by the same observer with both well-calibrated machines. It was observed that through the method of Pearson's bivaried correlation there are not statistically
significant differences between the pressures taken by both machines. As regards this fact, both
automatic machines of arterial pressure register are reliable....
[Llegir més ...]

[-]

This is a prospective and comparative work between arterial pressure obtained through manual
measurement with aneroid sphygmomanometer and the arterial pressure obtained through automatic
monitor.
The practice was carried out in a group of 100 inpatients in the Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology
Service in the Consortium of the General Hospital of Valencia during the first term of 2007.
The development of this hospital training was made on each individual through sequential
measurements and executed by the same observer with both well-calibrated machines. It was observed that through the method of Pearson's bivaried correlation there are not statistically
significant differences between the pressures taken by both machines. As regards this fact, both
automatic machines of arterial pressure register are reliable.