By any objective measure, Donald Trump is poised to lose the November election by a wide margin. Taking into consideration new swing-state polls from Quinnipiac University that show Trump trailing Hillary Clinton by 12, 10 and 3 points in Virginia, Colorado and Iowa, respectively, we can use RealClearPolitics’s average of recent polls in swing states (and 2012 results everywhere else) to estimate how this thing would turn out: Clinton with the easy win, improving on President Obama in 2012. – Washington Post

Here’s an article that shows definitively that Hillary is going to win the election but it doesn’t make much sense.

Every day something else goes wrong for Hillary. First the FBI explains she handled top secret data carelessly and then, not much later, leaked emails show she conspired with the Democratic Party to steal the nomination.

Recently, there have been allegations she was behind the murders of one or more individuals close to the Democratic Party, including one young man who may have “leaked” emails to WikiLeaks, HERE.

And her health seems to be a concern. She stumbles when she walks and has trouble standing up during public appearances and has to take a seat. There are even video clips seeming to show she has seizures, HERE.

And yet … through all of this and more, Hillary has kept accruing leads around the country. To some extent, her progress is blamed on Trump’s gaffes, though this doesn’t seem to make much sense either.

Trump is supposedly losing because he is making naïve and simplistic statements. For instance, he says he doesn’t “trust” intelligence agencies, HERE.

This is being held up as a reason not to vote for him. But as we recall, not so long ago, the CIA tried to blackmail Congress. HERE. Then there are consistent reports that the CIA deals drugs around the world to generate black-budget income. What Trump is saying makes perfect sense, and yet it is being held up as proof of his unfitness to serve.

Yesterday, we carried an article by Michael Moore accusing Trump of entering the race for publicity reasons. But even if one grants this, Trump doesn’t seem to have made statements that account for his current poor numbers.

What we are suggesting bluntly, and we have before, HERE, is that the polls are being manipulated. We note lately that Hillary not being trusted has stopped being discussed. It has simply been dropped even though her poll numbers keep rising.

Trump himself has worried about vote rigging. And now comes an article in USA Today that reinforces suspicions:

“Based on the stats we see, he looks strong,” says Ric Militi, co-founder of San Diego-based Crazy Raccoons, maker of the Zip question and answer app. His app poses questions and polls responses based on an average of 100,000 daily users. “I go with Trump, based on what we see.”

Militi explains that he uses “the power social media” to gain results that go beyond what is provided by question-based opinion polls.“We’re not a poll. We’re a conversation, and 100% anonymous.”

Some Zip questions: — ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton.

Zips’ founders say the app proved right about Trump during the primaries and they have no reason to doubt it remains accurate against Hillary.

From our point of view, Zip is more likely correct than the RealPolitics/WashPo numbers we cited at the beginning of this article. Something simply doesn’t add up. Why would people continue to add to their backing of Hillary during a time when she mishandled emails, conspired against Sanders and seems likely to have significant health problems.

What’s going on is a false narrative, a kind of “directed history.” It is fairly clear that the US mainstream media as a whole is anti-Trump, HERE. It is certainly possible this prejudice extends to polling facilities as well.

One can certainly establish through polling and various anti-Trump narratives that he is fumbling away the election. And having created this false narrative, one simply needs to manipulate the actual vote to declare Hillary the winner.

Is there any evidence of voter manipulation?

[From Conservative Daily] … Don’t Vote On THESE Machines, They Are Literally Controlling Them For Hillary … Guy Hacks and Alters Voting Machine In Under 5 Minutes … Donald Trump has publicly admitted he is afraid this election will be rigged or stolen from him. Millions of Americans agree with this logic, as well.

… Hillary Clinton recently kicked off an initiative called, ” My Dream, Your Vote.” The goal is to reach the 730,000 “young people” that are currently living in this country illegally. Hillary uses words like “dreamers” and “believers” when referring to them because she doesn’t want people to know what they really are: illegal.

Ask yourself, why would the Clinton’s not cheat again? The issue we have is multi-pronged: we will have to deal with large numbers of voter fraud as well as election theft via manipulated computerized machines.

A majority of states use computers with DIEBOLD/PES voting machines. There have been several reports from sources close to this that the machines have had faulty switches, glitches, and have been kept in unsecured locations for quite some time now.

So we can see how election theft might work. It is simple enough. Establish that Hillary is winning through a variety of manipulated polls and then use the much-questioned Diebold machines to actually throw the election in her favor.

The article goes on to point out that even a rudimentary “eye test” shows something is wrong with the polling. Hillary routinely attends meetings at fairly small venues and still has trouble filling them. Trump is regularly filling convention centers.

The article also cites Reuters polls that were apparently altered to favor Hillary. And there is this:

Here is another interesting fact: the state that is in power controls the voting machines. As an example, swing states like Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania were won by Obama in 2012, so Democrats in those states control the voting machines. Do you really think they will play fair with the stakes this high?

The polls seem obviously questionable. And as it turns out, the party in power has control of the voting machines.

The article concludes by suggesting that the only way Trump will win is if enough people turn out to vote for him. An informed and committed electorate is key. “If we all vote in record numbers, she can’t alter these machines because someone will notice and catch her.”

In several recent articles HERE and HERE we pointed out there seems plans afoot to try to move ahead with a merger of Mexico, Canada and the US in what is called the North American Union. With or without a single currency.

It is quite likley resistance to Trump in certain quarters has to do with the possibility that he would resist such a strategy. In this case, even though longer-term trends very evidently favor ongoing internationalism, his election might serve to slow what’s taking place.

We have the power to stop her by sharing stories like this so we all know what to watch out for in November. We need millions of people in swing states to see these stories!

Whether the “power to stop Hillary” actually exists, the reality is that if Hillary does become president, warring abroad and currency debasement domestically will likely advance aggressively. If she is truly unwell, her husband can always take over for her (assuming he is not sick, too) formally or informally. It’s happened before.

Conclusion: In the longer term, many US sociopolitical and economic trends may be unstoppable, but in the shorter term, it is certainly possible that a Trump presidency might slow them – at least for a little while.

You don’t have to play by the rules of the corrupt politicians, manipulative media, and brainwashed peers.

When you subscribe to The Daily Bell, you also get a free guide:

How to Craft a Two Year Plan to Reclaim 3 Specific Freedoms.

This guide will show you exactly how to plan your next two years to build the free life of your dreams. It’s not as hard as you think…

Clinton’s success in the polls says more about what America has become demographically than anything else. People with the congenital Liberal condition. In my estimation, it will not matter who is President when the ball drops

croasdale

“Yesterday, we carried an article by Michael Moore accusing Trump of entering the race for publicity reasons. But even if one grants this, Trump doesn’t seem to have made statements that account for his current poor numbers.”
That’s a surprising statement. Trump got a decent boost from the convention but has been squandering it steadily with his “statements”. He’s been giving the MSM all the ammo they can handle to skewer him, hence his drop in the polls.
The MSM want him to lose. It’s an uphill fight. Trump shouldn’t be helping them to defeat him, but he is. Most of the stuff he says comes from a deeper truth, but his “statements” are often superficial and not well worded so are fodder for those who want to take him down. Many that I talk to on web forums simply use his own quotes to justify their reason to not vote for him.

Praetor

Sure. And you could say the same thing about Hillary. Everything a politician says is superficial. Hillary has past quotes, that would make you believe she is a neocon. There is a lot about Hillary and her past that could give a person ‘reason to not vote for her’.

The only way MSM can skewer anyone, is if you watch. You don’t watch and suddenly the skewering stops, funny how that works!!!

apberusdisvet

There are voting experts that say that more than a 2% difference between exit polls and the machine totals is automatic proof of rigging. That has proven to be true in the most egregious cases of voter rigging, such as the 12 precincts in Philadelphia and the 3 counties in Ohio that registered NOT ONE SINGLE VOTE for Romney; a statistical impossibility. It will be interesting to see what happens on election day. I live in an historically Dem area where white native born Americans are a minority, but no one among all my neighbors, friends, business associates (including male or female, all ethnic backgrounds) is planning to vote for Hillary.

Colin Rafferty

It’s not counties or districts, but divisions. Divisions are tiny, maybe a couple of hundred people. There are 1700 divisions in Philly. You shouldn’t be surprised that there could be zero Romney voters in an inner-city division.

Everything involved in central political “authority” is rigged. From stem to stern. That’s the lesson I learned over 50 years ago, last time I voted. A criminal called Johnson trounced my hero, Barry Goldwater. It was an obvious heist. I was devastated.

I came to see, however, that “our” true forefathers knew that over a thousand years ago. Attila the Hun — and certainly by the time of Genghis Khan — understood that, in order to keep the slaves producing at top faculty, they must be kept fat, happy, and divided among and between themselves. Those guys were brilliant conquerors, and comprehended the science of rulership — that it was relatively easy (well prior to what we now observe as “the-mainstream-media”) to convince the slaves that they were part-and-parcel of “our-great-nation”.

So you never hear me devote time or emotional energy lamenting current bread-and-circus events. Time’s too short. The white man’s “elections” will come out the way they “should” come out — and I’ll remain free in the interim. If Clinton wins (whatever that’s supposed to mean) the essential and final collapse might come about sooner than if Trump “wins”. I don’t know. Sam

Gerold

Bill Clinton seems to be wasting away so his health seems as
poor as Hillary’s. Considering his propensity to stick it where it doesn’t
belong, he likely came home with more than he left with and probably infected her which is why neither of them will last long. Unfortunately, Obama may get a third term if Hillary manages to steal the election before short-circuiting permanently.

I’m glad I’m not American. This is the most embarrassing U.S. election I’ve ever watched

Pete W H

This is the most embarrassing government I have ever seen and I have seen a lot. I call it the slow motion coup d’état.

FreeOregon

Doesn’t the NSA make the final decision?

CA John

All these electronic voting terminals (Dibold, etc) must have central nodes, “and a Node to rule them all”. The Nodes are where it will be easiest to “adjust’ the tally. I notice that the news articles are silent on the “Concentrator Nodes”, re.,adjusting the vote tally.

Well, we filed a lawsuit about it and the state refused to hand over the goods. Brought an expert up from the successful Florida hack conducted by Bev Harris; state said we don’t own election results, Diebold does, and you just have to trust us that we’ve announced the correct winner. No “probably” about it. For computer “malfunctions” showing my race in all Georgia districts, not just the one in which I was running, the state said that the machines malfunction in the heat. Have you ever been to GA in the summer time? Ran out of money, of course, to appeal decision. So, theft stands.

I used to follow you when you worked with Mike Ruppert. I know the Daily Bell has debunked his views of peak oil, but I always appreciated what you did for your district. You were/are amazing.

Cynthia McKinney PhD

You know, although Mike was my dear friend and I miss him to this day, I never bought the peak oil theory and told him so many times. He would always ask to put my name on something about it; I always refused. Thanks for mentioning Mike. I miss him to this day.

comrade

The whole political class is corrupt, all presidents are selected
not elected, H. Clinton is the next selected President. THE END