SexBots Can be Raped!…But Only By Men!

It always sucks when an otherwise excellent show is ruined by pc feminizing and rape hysteria. The above trailer is for AMC’s show “humans” a dystopic depiction of human society in the very near future where human like robot assistants called “synths” do our bidding, freeing up time and increasing productivity for their human masters. The creator of the synths has managed to imbue just a handful of robots with true artificial intelligence, they are sentient creatures, and are on a quest to search each other out. One of these robots is working in a brothel, none of the johns who visit her know that she is sentient, she hides this fact from them fearing that if man discovers that there are sentient robots within their midst they might search them out and destroy them for fear of the potentially disastrous ramifications they represent.

Thus, here are the Johns, visiting this robo-brothel, thinking they are having sex with an inanimate, albeit sexually attractive female sex-robot. The sexbot, having enough of a working girls lifestyle decides to break out of the brothel and find her sentient robot kin, and as she does so, she confronts the madame of the robo bar, attack her and tells her (paraphrasing) “All of your men want to do to you, what they do to me” This is not the exact phrase but the implication was clear, that all men, deep down want a personal private woman to rape, and they would, if only they could get away with it.

The series while at times shining through with excellent portrayals of how humans can be tricked into bonding or even falling in love with these synth robots, is peppered with more than one attempt to depict these inanimate robots as being saved by other humans from the crime of rape….

It’s almost as if the writers are all working hard on this gem of a show, but are too afraid to reject the silly ideas of the one female feminist who managed to find her way onto the writing staff, either that or the editor in chief is banging said feminist and is doing all of this to appease her.

Whatever the case may be this ridiculous notion of female sex robots being capable of being raped has been floating around feminist circles for quite some time now, most recently with a ted talk where a feminist by the name of Jincey Lumpkin actually posed the question “Can robots be raped?”

Ted talk lost all of its credibility with me when they let this dunce on, but I link this video simply to show you the extent to which women want to criminalize male sexuality, they understand the ramifications of men having an aesthetically pleasing dirty talking sexbot to bang in comparison to them and they do not like it one bit, I’ve detailed this here as well, the release of the film ex machina really got this whole drive to protect the sexbots from the evil male sex drive rolling.

“Once you’ve had a lover robot, you’ll never want a real man again.” That’s a line from Gigolo Joe, the sexbot played byJude Law in A.I. Artificial Intelligence, the 2001 Steven Spielberg film. What makes Gigolo Joe special—aside from his dewy skin, gnocchi-plump lips, and shiny-suit razzmatazz—is that he represents a very rare filmic depiction of a male sexbot .

Think about it. The sexbots you know and love are almost exclusively female bots servicing human men. They’re the Stepford Wives’ gynoids and Austin Powers’ s fembots; they’re Ava and Kyoko of Ex Machina and Pris of Blade Runner. Chick sexbots populate television, too. Buffy the Vampire Slayer‘s April and the Buffybot were lovingly crafted with the express purpose of fucking. Humans’ bellicose Niska is a sexbot, as, arguably, is Battlestar Gallactica’s Six. Dark Matter’s Wendy is an “entertainment android,” whose abilities include sex. While Star Trek: The Next Generation’s Data is “fully functional,” his functionality is more a feature than his purpose—being able to have sex does not a sexbot make. Intentionality is key.

Notice how there is no talk of artificially intelligent male robots that are subject to extreme violence, (David from Prometheus is an example who was decapitated) they are conveniently never mentioned, and notice the hypocritical way the author gushes over a male robot bearing the likeness of jude law. I guess when a woman shows sexual attraction to a male robot it’s cute, and when a man does it for a female robot it’s at best creepy and borderline rape at worst, or at least a manifestation of the deep urge to rape that all men are apparently suppressing that could bubble up to the surface at any minute or some shit…

These media representations have set up both our expectations of what sexbots should look like (undeniably hot, recognizably human, and typically female) as well as what our reactions should be (an erotic frisson of fear and curiosity). Think of Pris’s manipulative shy-girl act in Blade Runner, Kyoko’s placid, mute unbuttoning of her blouse in Ex Machina, or the bright red dress of Six and her wet, hot, world-destroying kiss. Movies and television depict sexbots as women who are simultaneously objectified and untrustworthy; sexbots personify a metaphor for a walking, talking, seducing monster. Given this model, it’s especially important that the sexbots you see are female and their consumers are male.

Aaand it begins, women are objectified blah blah blah female robots are always portrayed as hypersexual blah blah bah… Doesn’t matter to these people that (spoiler) the female artificially intelligent robot uses her sexuality to manipulate a man into freeing her after she killed her creator, thats, like, empowering and stuff. Somehow it all must come back to the patriarchy and somehow it is still mens fault. It’s a powerful metaphor isn’t it? the fact that men are the only creatures in this planet with the capability and intelligence to create artificial intelligence and women are the only creatures capable of somehow turning that unprecedented accomplishment (when it happens, and it will) into a blame the menz rape narrative.

Fictional sexbots matter because every month drags sexbots closer to becoming a reality. Last September , Kathleen Richardson, a robot ethicist at England’s Montfort University, launched her Campaign Against Sex Robots with Erik Billing of Sweden’s University of Skövde. Steeped in anti–sex worker rhetoric, the campaign’s manifestostates, “We take issue with those arguments that propose that sex robots could help reduce sexual exploitation and violence towards prostituted persons, pointing to all the evidence that shows how technology and the sex trade coexist and reinforce each other creating more demand for human bodies.” It’s a dystopian vision.

The Campaign Against Sex Robots is a prophylactic organization, since no sexbots really exist. A company called TrueCompanion claims to make “the world’s first and highest quality sex robot doll,” but their female model, a $7,000 machine dubbed Roxxxy, is essentially a stationary rubber-clad computer equipped with touch sensors and a vibrating vagina. But Richardson is right that there are a lot of would-be sexbot creators who see her sci-fi nightmare as a shiny future full of possibilities.

One of these people is Matt McMullen, creator of the RealDoll, who is currently developing an animatronic sex doll with artificial intelligence. “The hope is to create something that will actually arouse someone on an emotional and intellectual level,” McMullen avers in a slickNew York Times video segment that’s lit with an Instagram-like romantic haze. The video profiles McMullen’s quest to make “the world’s first sex ro-obot,” as Denise, the computer animation, says with a telling diphthong. His company’s RealDolls are touted as the Rolls Royce of sex dolls, but even a Rolls Royce Wraith looks pretty antiquated to people who lust after a MacLaren P1. Hence the need to create something that walks and talks—or at least writhes and whispers—like a living human woman.

Though McMullen and Richardson are diametrically opposed, they assume three very crucial points about sexbots, and none of them are necessarily true. First, that the primary consumers of sexbots will be heterosexual men. Second, that these consumers need their sexbots to look recognizably human. And third, that consumers require an emotional attachment to their bot.

So here’s my radical thought: What if we throw those assumptions aside? Fuck men and their need for bots that fall into the uncanny valley. What if we choose, instead, to market sexbots to women? How does that one simple change rewrite the entire sexbot script?

How to market sex bots to women? easy, put a feature in these male robots where they routinely disobey the womans commands, make them randomly pick a night where they disappear, get plastered on antifreeze or whatever the equivalent of robot booze would be, and come home and fuck their female master in the ass, to any entrepreneurs attempting this feat, do not under any circumstances make these robots with a “nice guy” mode or else they will end up in the trash heap and most women will not buy them in the first place…

Joking of course…

But not really.

The point here of course is that if women all of a sudden take to banging sex bots men aren’t going to start a social movement based on demonizing the female sex drive, we’d just join in the festivities by purchasing our own female sex robots for our own pleasure. There does not have to be a campaign to market sexbots to only one gender at a time, although the author would probably like that, sexbots for women only and a constitutional amendment making female sexbots illegal, wouldn’t surprise me in the slightest.

It wouldn’t take tech as advanced as Gigolo Joe to pique women’s interest in sexbots. For one thing, women already use sex toys. While some, albeit limited, studies suggest sex toy purchasers are split roughly evenly between women and men, there’s no denying that the sex toys made for women are more common, better functioning, and more interesting. Moreover, women don’t really care whether the toy they’re using to orgasm even faintly resembles the anatomy of a human man. The closest cousin to a Hitachi magic wand is a handheld blender, but no one cares that this iconic vibrator looks nothing like a dick. While toys for men, whether Fleshlights or RealDolls, conjure the appearance of an actual woman, women’s toys don’t.

Fleshlights certainly do not conjure the appearance of an actual woman, they conjure, much like the millions of vibrating penises that women pleasure themselves with every day, a disembodied female sex organ, men are more than capable of selecting out the bits and pieces of the female anatomy they find pleasurable and rejecting the rest purely for their sexual satisfaction, this is not a female trait by any stretch of the imagination, and as far as real dolls are concerned, let’s not pretend that women would prefer a vibrator over a realistic looking sex bot of their ideal male specimen…and since when is human sexuality so simple that it can be reduced to men will only want chicks and women will only want dicks? there are of course gay men, and lesbians, and men that will want a “female” sexbot with a functioning penis and women that will want a male-like sexbot with a functioning vagina, the various combinations that sex robots will take are vast and will likely resemble the current state of porn, with a market for every conceivable fetish the human mind is capable of thinking up.

It continues from there folks but I cant read this nonsense any longer. Peruse at your own risk.

At some point these women will realize how dangerous it is to make sex robot with the primary directive of thrusting to pleasure.

It’s like piston motion sex toys. You are very likely to hurt yourself unless you have a team of guys there to make sure it’s being safely used. Like on the set of a porn.

Where as the female sex bot doesn’t even need to be one AI. It could actually be two. One for pillow talk and the other for body movement to be in sync with the man’s. Actually make it three. The third one could be for the artificial vaginal canal to release different types of lube and regulate temperature.

Maybe add two more AIs for the mouth and butt.
—

I wonder if these women realize that sex robots will also have the unintended effects of curbing pedophiles and male-prison-rape.

Bar Bar – I know you are busy with the book but I’d like you to do an update/post on infighting and MGTOW Levels cannibalizing the movement especially following the Niko Choski incident where he no longer identifies with the MGTOW label and deleting videos. It will be cool if you guys could do a short hangout together with even CS MGTOW & Dark Knight chiming in with their opinions of the incident. (I do not wish to name the youtube channel apparently bullying Niko as I don’t want them to get free publicity).

Also I am sick of how the rest of the Manosphere thinks those of us who refuse to date are being “paranoid” by citing false rape allegations calling us ‘isolationists’, funnily the blog that did that had one of the commentators talking about how an ex pulled an oops pregnancy on him and him having to pay child support for her 1 yr old- as Terrence Popp would say to these wanna be alphas –> GONORRHEA…NAAH!

It’s so funny how they are incapable of noticing how much they desperately want to control the situation, they know they future is coming and they try harder and harder to make men more dependent on women while trying to increase they’re own perks.

Regardless I doubt they will succeed, the most they can hope for is that female bots are so expensive that one would have to shell out 90-100 K for a high functioning one, and that’s what they’re really afraid of in the back of they’re minds, that a select few males within the population can afford to have a privately owned robot concubine (affluent single men having an outlet and reducing the effects of old vulnerabilities; can’t have that happening now can they)

Absolutely they used to have credibility, not that long ago either.
Every episode used to be about Technology Entertainment & Design. They were always previewing some new cure for disease, figuring out how to feed the world, print organs for transplant! There was the bloke who was planning a trip to the edge of space. The guy who developed the wing suit. The guy who put jet engines on a wing suit.

Not two possibly four years ago TED was like a drug for me. It was the most inspirational and entertaining thing I had ever seen. One episode could bring me out of a depression that had lasted months.

I just tuned in one day and there this morose psycho explaining that all women prisons should be closed. Because her “Feminist Statistics” showed that Female violent offenders simply don’t exist.
So i drove my Chevy to the levy, but the levy was dry…

It’s not my intention to come across enisling. But I can’t help but feel a certain sorrow at your lack of perception for what has been lost. My anger is of course directed at those who could not temperate the lime lite taking focus upon the people that deserved it.

hey, that’s kinda how I felt when a movement where guys were talking about their lives and experiences became–buy my book on Amazon. Where it was okay for a blog to go dark because a guy “went ghost” or just couldn’t muster the energy to deal with trolls and just wanted to focus on real life hobbies. But now you’ve got alpha males saying how they are the “true’s” and ____ for life, and ____ monks. Kinda hard to “go ghost” when you are “building a brand” so you can “sell shit.”

–and, no I have no problem with people charging money for content they created before all the libertarian tough guys call me a basement dwelling virgin commie socialist….

…I do have a problem with someone trying to “sell” a “worldview” or philosophy though…

Today, in the US alone, tens upon tens of millions of men are paying child support to women. Why? Because women don’t want men. Instead, women want the government to forcefully transfer men’s wealth to woman through all forms of gimmies for women. Alimony and child support are two fundamental ways but far from being the primary ways. Women are the apex predators and parasites of the West.

When an unmarried woman has a child, she automatically qualifies for free college tuition to any college in the world. Why do you think so many woman have children out of wedlock and why so many more women are in college than men? You qualify for free college tuition under many circumstances just for not being male + being a minority. Since males pay the majority of taxes, guess who’s footing the bill?

My hand, imagination and a bit of lubricant are far more powerful than any woman’s sexual hold over me. Women are without merit in terms of sex. They’re without merit in terms of value.

Untold billions are transferred from men to woman every single year, either through their taxes, child support and/or alimony.

Males pay the vast majority of taxes yet qualify for the fewest benefits derived from those taxes. Untold hundreds of thousands of men’s lives are destroyed by the government & women every single year through marriage and divorce alone.

The MGTOW mindset is a blessing to all men. MGTOW seek to free men from the horrific brainwashing of white knightism and gynocentrism. Women with power will always seek to destroy men and lock them under gynocentric power. White knights will always kiss the ass of gynocentrists.

If the collective world’s mouth were on fire, I wouldn’t piss in it to put it out. Men are the slaves of the West. Sex and relationships with women are detrimental to men’s happiness. Even a female bot will eventually ruin a man – with the full help and support of the white knight bot.

First the description of the various Sex-bots in the article is all wrong. Actual mechanical robots are completely different from the Replicants in Blade Runner or the Cylons in Battlestar Galactica, and the even the Synths in the game Fallout 4. These are not true machines, they a biologically created artificial humans. They feel emotions, they need to eat, they hurt, they bleed, they defecate, and they die. The only thing separating them from us is the material and way in which they were made. They have their own DNA and that is what separates them from a mechanical sex-bot. Even if you give this sex-bot an AI that replicates human thought, they simply can never be considered on the same level as a human female or even a human male. The synthetic humans in BSG, Blade Runner, and Fallout 4 are all considered machines, but they really are not. They are biological machines but then again so are we. They were all created for the same reason, to serve mankind and make our lives easier. I personally believe this whole thing with sex-bots is going to be a very short lived thing. They will be very quickly replaced by true artificial humans that will be stronger and faster thinkers than us. Why the popular press and even the scientific community think the human race is destined to merge with machine I do not know. We as humans have innate need to remain biological; we will never fully embrace being a cyborg. Certainly there will be a small minority of humans that choose to embrace this cyborg lifestyle. It will be considered much like a religion and it will have its followers and there of course will be the heavy decenters that shun them. But what we do have the in-built need to play god, as or as close to godlike as we can be.

We have already created artificial biologic life. Here is a link to the article, it’s on the huff-post, but if you google it you can find all sorts of articles on it. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/07/living-organism-artificial-dna_n_5283095.html . The point here is that we have already made artificial life forms. The next step is to start making it into higher forms of animal life and eventually some corporation is going to take it to the next level and make an artificial human. In the lore of the Blade Runner movie, the original reason that Replicants were made was due to a plague that killed off almost all the world’s animals. They used the knowledge of making artificial life to remake animals and pets for humans and to grow meat that they eat. They then simply took the next step and made human like Replicants to be slaves, and because they are technically not true humans and are artificial in origin they do not meet the criteria to be treated as humans. They are grown in tanks on an assembly line. So what we have here is the very early start to one of these possible futures. How we end up treating what we make will not depend on how and what we think know, but how the contemporaries of that future view the treatment of these creations in their time. Even if we laid down laws now to prevent any of this, there is simply no way to see how in the future these very ideas will be stomped out. So let them rattle their feminist chains all they want. Let them make laws about sex-bots, it simply won’t make any difference. It will be the following generations that will simply turn these laws over as antiquated and not applicable to their present time and conditions. This is how we do things now. If there is an old law and it simply is not applicable to the present day conditions that law is overturned or disavowed and it is removed. So anything that is written into law here 2016 will make no difference say in the year 2050 or 2075. The conditions of those times will dictate the forms of law and if they have Artificial Humans in the world’s workforce and they are segregated from human laws and rights that is something that their time must deal with. I personally would like to see how this future will pan out, but I will never see it and neither will anyone reading this. It is several generations away from us and all these feminists worrying over things that have not even come to past is just a total waste of time. I say just ignore them.

One final note, they are so worried about the female sex-bots getting raped. Well there are going to be male sex-bots and they are going to get just as used and abused and raped as the female ones, and possibly by men. So I don’t see them even considering this side of the coin. Typical feminists of course.

I would use sexbots. Yes…I would be happy to the idea of a robotic sex ‘slave’. However is it still essentially enhanced masturbation. The robot is not sentient.

If the robot is indeed ‘sentient’ or is effectively declared sentient by political forces. Then I won’t use them. However, I will not be forced to marry. I will not associate with women. Period. Women will not have power over me. This is non-negotiable. If it is marriage or celibacy, I choose celibacy. Why? What is my problem? I want control of my resources. I require the condition that if I choose to eject a female from my life, that there is no lingering costs or side effects. YES WOMEN, YOU GET NOTHING! FUCK YOU!

Women…..politicians…will not force me to become a slave. Divorce = slavery. Take my children and force me to become an indentured servant….NO! This is not theory for me…this is my existence, and if my words can spare even one man it is worth it.

Can I fuck a robot? Great. Try to make it illegal? Fuck you! You gain NOTHING!! I will get off without paying your fucking toll.

Sexbots for women is not going to happen. The idea of women spending large sums of money on a “male” sexbot defies reality. They do not want to do that with real men, and no way in hell are they going to do it with fake ones They like men to dine and wine, surprise them, like to feel attractive to the male gaze and so on and so forth.

Men already spend their money on real women so it is not so far fetched to spend it on sexbots. They will most likely by them clothes and do all types of other stuff.

We aren’t anywhere close to AI and I doubt anything resembling really humans will be in the pipe work within the next few decades. I mean they cannot even make something that resembles real breasts yet. They defy gravity and well just look plastic.

All in all it’s kinda of sad state of affairs and well just messed up. Thank you feminism. You suck.