Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

A bit confused. Warren's official announcement came in front of what looks like a traditional "Democratic blue" with (maybe?) the mint as an accent. Why not use the clear navy and mint (and red) that's clearly the official brand all over the website (elizabethwarren.com)

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

A bit confused. Warren's official announcement came in front of what looks like a traditional "Democratic blue" with (maybe?) the mint as an accent. Why not use the clear navy and mint (and red) that's clearly the official brand all over the website (elizabethwarren.com)

Share on other sites

I personally don't understand any praise Warren's logo is getting. It's a name with a line under it with colors that don't project strength whatsoever.

"You can tell I mean business by my definitely unique dark blue and my is that white light blue."

Although that is one heck of a place to hold a rally, didn't show the backdrop on tv but its pretty striking. I like the buntings.

I actually buy in to Kamala's "warm rwb palette" justification, but that doesn't mean it has to be good. Candidates have beaten us over the head with REDWHITEANDBLUE for so long that any other colors seem like a nice change of pace or a bold new step, when in a vacuum... they suck.

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

I think this is what she's going for: a benevolent activist government that welcomes the hatred of the wealthy. And I like it. It's strong in its own way, and I always appreciate a good look to the past. I also appreciate getting so high that you can hear Tupac albums that haven't been recorded yet, but putting that into good art direction is more complicated.