Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

View

Discuss

Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

itwbennett writes "It can browse the web, edit Office docs, run apps. Is it a low-cost, low-function e-reader? Nope, it's a Nook. And now that XDA has rooted it, how Barnes & Noble responds will determine whether the Nook has a tablet future, says blogger Ryan Faas. 'If the device can be turned into a capable Android tablet (which technically it already is) easily, the $250 price tag certainly beats out some of the competition.'"

If the nook was priced under cost and expected to be subsidised by ebook sales, then they will come down on this like apple. If they are making money on the thing in its own right, they may react like a BSD developer.

Mind you, loss leaders (which subsidised hardware for expensive consumables are) are a distortion of a free market. Anything which undermines it is wholesome and good.

(Used to buy for a small retailer. Often the shelf price at large retailers was less than the wholesale price from the manufacturer/distributor. But they had "Three per customer" type limits, which turns out to be illegal under my State's consumer laws (written specifically to punish loss-leaders, apparently.) Used to make for fun public arguments.)

Yeah, work in retail myself, in the past have been asked by a boss to go to a competitor and buy all their stock of one item, because they were selling it cheaper than our wholesaler.

This happens far more often than you think, actually. And it doesn't have to be a loss-leader, even! If you're a small store, you're a bother to the distributor. You don't move enough product, yet they have to stock some for you. If it's a hot item, you'll find you're the first to go on "allocation" and the last to get one or t

My favorite local gaming store won't stock HeroScape because Wal-Mart sells it for less than he can buy it for. People would buy it from him when Wal-Mart was out-of-stock, then play his copy, buy a copy from Wal-Mart and return the Wal-Mart copy to him on the 30th day after purchase.

If you buy a billion units you get the item a lot cheaper than if you buy 10. That's true of everything.

A free market is a market in which there is no economic intervention and regulation by the state, except to enforce private contracts and the ownership of property. It is the opposite of a controlled market, in which the state directly regulates how goods, services and labor may be used, priced, or distributed, rather than relying on the mechanism of private ownership.

Clearly. Loss leaders themselves are not a violation of free market capitalism per se, but the things that they do to make it work are. Adam Smith was completely opposed to any sort of monopoly over anything. No exceptions at all. And in order for loss leaders to work in most cases you have to have some sort of monopoly. Even if it is just requiring the users to buy products that are licensed for it by producers that pay a licensing fee for the privilege.

Well, I figured the fact that I was saying something similar to "We all know that 1+1=3..." but I guess when it comes to the free market, such an obviously contradictory statement is commonplace and meant seriously, sadly.

the Corporation is anathema to a free market in that they become de-facto government and can then use loss leaders and such to exert their power

And when, exactly, did it become illegal for smaller businesses to sell things as loss leaders? Did the Evil Corporations(tm) pass legislation at some point that limits the razor-and-blade model to only businesses of a certain size or something?

Mind you, loss leaders (which subsidised hardware for expensive consumables are) are a distortion of a free market. Anything which undermines it is wholesome and good.

How? The consumer can decide what they want to buy and where - and get slower prices as a result. If consumables are the real profit center, a store could not sell the loss leader and put some of the savings to lower consumable prices; so the store selling the loss leader either lowers consumable prices or loses money. In the end, the consumer benefits from free market prices.

A free market allows individuals to set prices and determine desired profits; not some manufacturer or government. Nor does it ensure everyone will make a profit.

Exactly! Selling something at a loss is the EXACT same thing as selling people. I wish more people could see the connection, my friend.

Oh, and you know who else sells things at a loss to make more money on consumables? Hitler. So only buy a Nook if you support Hitler.

Thank you.

No, all GP meant was that laws against slavery were/are interfering with the pure free market, and that the only sane conclusion from this is that totally unrestricted free markets are not necessarily a good thing.

Although I know a lot of people here would conclude that it was the laws against slavery that were bad, as anything that interferes with the free market is bad.

For example, a rational seller stocking a highly desirable item may raise the price of that item, while subsidizing the cost of other items in their stock, in order to attract customers to their business.

Must be a regional thing... at least here, in SW Florida, milk follows the same pattern as everything else in those places, with the added bonus of (anecdote alert) seeming to be spoiled despite the shelf-date.

Please explain how this is a distortion of a free market.You have supply, demand and a fixed cost.Now if the supply and demand equilibrium falls under your fixed cost. That usually means that it may not be the best product to sell. However if over the use of the product there is the ability to bring in more revenue. Then the loss would be considered as an investment. Much the same as an advertising campaign. As right now the cost of the ereader is more then the market wants they will loose a lot more in content.

It is a classic give away the razor and sell the blades.

Now yes if it being sold under price B&N will make a fuss as they are giving a way a product that costs them money for no return.

Agreed - loss leaders in themselves are not a distortion of the free market. What would be a distortion is the producer being able to use the law to prevent people buying the razor and then using their own cheap blades (or in B&N's case, someone buying the Nook and not using it to buy books if it is indeed an example of a loss leader). A free market should allow you to come up with whatever promotional ideas you want to make money, but similarly it should allow your customers to ignore your ideas and do their own thing. The second those ideas have some element that is enforced by law (i.e. you can ONLY use product X with service Y and tampering with X to allow Z is illegal) it is no longer free.

It could well turn out that the interesting price tag is only possible because the tethering supposedly recovers the lower hardware price. You see the same done from printers to cellphones to coffee makers, and it's getting more and more commonplace these days.

And while I do find this pricing policy despicable and there should be something done about this kind of racketeering (face it, that's what it is. You bought my hardware, now buy the consumables with me or yo

Barnes and Noble is, first and foremost, a book retailer, dependant on and beholden to publishers. Since rooting is the first step towards defeating Digital Restrictions Management, I suspect that B&N will fight rooting as hard as they can for as long as they can, regardless of the Nook's pricing model.

The non-3G version gets free AT&T hotspot access. The 3G version gets free 3G access. They want you to use that for their books. If you root your tablet, you can download anything you want. I don't think they'll be subsidizing a bunch of us playing Doom for Nook across AT&T's network. They want to subsidize us buying their books.

That I can then get _my_ books off of my nook onto my laptop in a readable format?

Seriously, at $10 for the book or $9 for the ebook (real sample prices for Harry Dresden novels, rounded up by one cent from nook store) there needs to be some way for me to recover "my property" off the device other than buying another one.

No, actually, I don't own a nook because of the "not really my book" and so the super-shallow discounts for the rental of a title made getting one "kinda dumb" IMHO.

I expect at worst you could recover the encrypted files. You might be able to get the plaintext if B&N were foolish enough to implement their crypto in software only. If they were smart then crypto is done in hardware and therefore it is more difficult but not impossible to recover the plaintext.

The most obvious way to recover plaintext from any ebook is to lay the thing on a flatbed scanner and take a picture of every page. I expect most OCR software would work extremely well given the quality of the

I'm kind of torn on the subject. On the one hand, it's nice to have options, but on the other hand, we shouldn't need to do this in the first place in order to do what we want with paid for content, and by buying into these DRM schemes we're reinforcing their validity. Not only that, it's driving legitimate customers to the tools of piracy in order to do what they should be able to do by default.

I don't own any B&N device but I'd point out that just because it was done that way on one device / OS over a year ago does not necessarily mean it's done the same way now. It is possible for a device to support more than one crypto sceheme, or for this new device to store its key somewhere other than on disk. For example it could be stored in a flash partition that is inaccessible when the device is rooted.

If B&N were so incompetent the first time around I wouldn't credit them with doing any of t

Can you run adobe digital editions? If you use that to manage your ebooks on your pc, you can put them on any device associated with the software.

I know this works with the 2-week loans from my library, I haven't checked yet if it works with books downloaded from B&N. At the moment, though, it doesn't look to me like you can move stuff *from* the nook onto the pc in this way.

You can, however, read the stuff in your nook library on any device with nook software. This includes PC software, an iPod app,

That I can then get _my_ books off of my nook onto my laptop in a readable format?

I don't know about the Nook Color, but for the Nook itself, yes you can: easily. Without jailbreaking.

First, connect the Nook via USB. It's just a USB storage device using FAT32. All your downloaded ebooks will be in "my B&N downloads" on the root of the device. Annoyingly they're named by random numbers, but whatever, you can still grab them and get them off the device.

They will be DRMed, but the DRM is cracked and trivial: the key is the name on your credit card plus the credit card number itself. The idea is that you won't be willing to distribute the key. (Which is somewhat silly, since the key is actually an SHA1 hash of your credit card and name, and therefore you're really not giving anything out.)

Just Google for "ignoblekey" and "ignobleepub" and you should find two Python scripts to handle decrypting the files.

Finally, you'll need an application that supports reading EPUB files on your laptop. Calibre is apparently the best choice for Linux, so try "emerge calibre" and see if that works.

Also, there's no limit to the number of devices that you can copy the epub files to. As long as you log in to the Nook software using your account, you should be able to download books to any device that supports the Nook software. Which doesn't include Linux. Or Mac OS X. But does include the iPad, making me wonder why anyone would want to get a Nook Color.

They will be DRMed, but the DRM is cracked and trivial: the key is the name on your credit card plus the credit card number itself. The idea is that you won't be willing to distribute the key. (Which is somewhat silly, since the key is actually an SHA1 hash of your credit card and name, and therefore you're really not giving anything out.)

I might not be able to work out what name+number made 298AC...898EAB, but B&N certainly can -- they have a list of all the name+number combinations.

Couldn't you have just used the Nook PC app under WINE?
And on the subject, at least in comparison to Kindle, the DRM of B&N books is pretty easy to remove, leaving you with an unprotected ePub file. Though, I don't really recommend doing this for viewing on the Nook, just as a backup, as you lose all the social and sync features on side-loaded books.

Can't you just download your bn.com-purchased books from the "My NOOK Library" section of their site? I don't have a Nook, but I do purchase eBooks from Barnes&Noble, and that is how I retrieve them.

Of course, then I have to decrypt their files (I use a pair of python scripts [blogspot.com]), load them into Calibre (or any epub reader), and then convert them to the format I want. It would be much simpler if they came without DRM.

(HEY Barnes and Nobel! If I could extend a nook account to include my Gentoo laptop as one of my five allowed clone devices, I would have bought the thing. Just Sayin...)

You do realize that the cost of supporting one of the more obscure and arcane Linux distributions probably outweighs the income it would bring in, right? If you want to advocate for desktop Linux, you'll be far more effective if you ask for Fedora or Ubuntu support. Even that isn't all that likely to happen in the near future, but it beats

I own a Nook and, as of yesterday, a Nook Color. When you buy from B&N through the device, it downloads automatically, and I believe that copy is tied to that device. However, you can deregister that device, and download to another one whenever you want. More important, however, you can log in to your B&N account with any web browser, and download the.epub file, and "side load" it on to any device any time, or read it in any program that can read.epub files.

Well, there is the Nook client software for PC/Mac, that lets you read their books on your computer. I think it even synchronizes the page you're on across devices. I don't think you can hook up a USB cable and get books off your Nook, however.

That I can then get _my_ books off of my nook onto my laptop in a readable format?

AFAIK, any book you buy from the Nook store can be used on the Nook, on the free Nook PC app, on the free Nook iOS app, and on the free Nook Android app.

Of course, nothing is requiring you to buy books from the Nook store to get use out of a Nook -- the Nook supports DRM-free ebooks in a number of popular formats (most importantly epub and PDF), which are available through a number of sources (both free and for-pay) on the int

I did that for all my Kindle books after I discovered that the kindle sucks for any other use other than reading amazon ebooks

Hey, could you elaborate on this point? I was just looking at getting a Kindle, and I plan to use it for project-gutenberg e-books as well as some PDF publications for work. It would be good to know what exactly "sucked" for you when using non-Amazon books.

He's talking out of his ass. There's nothing wrong with reading non-Amazon books on the Kindle. I do it exclusively - I have yet to buy anything from them. Just make sure you download the mobi files or use Calibre to convert the text.

It's also trivially easy with a few python scripts to strip the DRM from any kindle book you've purchased legally (think about it- the kindle has to be able to decrypt the book, and it's running on a pretty small chip). All you need to do is extract your decrypt key from the kindle, which turns out to be a function of the kindle's serial number.

I've done this for all the books I've bought for the kindle, to save a "just in case" version. It's also worth noting that the majority of piratebay books are pretty lousy OCR scans of books, with lots of markup and text errors. All the harry dresden books, for example, decided to be in a bold fond in the version I downloaded. Makes purchasing them a LOT more worthwhile (which I ended up doing for the first few, until I decided to give up on the series, but that's another story).

Still, I recognize that purchasing from amazon/bn/whoever is just supporting the business model of DRM, even if I strip out the DRM later. Would be nice to get somebody who didn't use platform lockin techniques, but that's probably unlikely in the near term.

I would agree that the Kindle makes a really awful device for watching videos, surfing the web or just about any activity other than reading books. The display is only gray scale and it is very slow compared to a LCD monitor. I would not want to do much writing on a Kindle as the keyboard is not really suited for it.

However, that being said, the Kindle is a really fine reading device and the free web connectivity means you can go out to web sites and download free books. It is not restricted in any way t

As soon as I saw this thing was rooted, I ran out and bought one - partially because it is a really nice little Android tablet, but mostly because it's a damn nice reader. The first app I put on it was the Kindle app. It's arguably the best Kindle reader out there.

I also bought some Nook books, which I had not done before.

I would not have either purchased a Nook (I expect there will be better/cheaper Android tabs very shortly - look at all the dual core tegra tablets on the way...) or purchased any Nook B

Does the Kindle app require a menu and/or back button? That's my biggest concern with buying one. I'm certain that this i sa first step in liberating the NC in all it's glory, but the lack of the physical buttons makes me wonder how far this can actually go. One thing I've actually seen suggested is using the volume buttons for back and menu, which seems like a great idea--especially since volume control can be accessed from onscreen settings.

I'm just waiting for something like this to work with an e-reader that uses e-ink.

The e-Ink based Nook (which also runs Android) was rooted and used to run regular Android apps fairly quickly after it was released. As I understand it, though, the two screen layout made it awkward, because apps aren't designed for that setup.

You do know that at any given point in time there are multiple generations still living, right?

Of course not! A fact like that would really take the wind out of a good rant!;)

I've taken my kids to the library regularly pretty much since they could do more than gurgle and throw up on my shirt. Every week or two we head down there, drop off a pile of books and leave with another, for free. I can browse the library's catalog online and have the books waiting for me by the time I show up. If my library doesn't have the book I can get it from another, for free.

Harry Potter (and books like it) saved the world of literature for the next generation as sad as that is. These books aren't high art, but they got a whole group of kids interested in reading that never would have otherwise.

I mean, it's almost all of the expense of a tablet, without the features, and you can't read it as well in the daytime as the original nook. B&N should focus on doing their core business - stuff people read - well.

Because no one reads Car and Driver, Road and Track, Cycle World, Sports Illustrated, Mother Earth News, Maximum PC, , Time, Newsweek, Discovery, Scientific American, or any of those magazines full of color pictures.

Why remove 95% of the functionality and make your product worth less to your customers? Are you worried that people will buy your tablet, and download the Kindle app? Then make your book store the best! Customers might just support your store because they enjoy your tablet.

I want an Android tablet that I can flash and update with new releases, that has a decent touchscreen. Is that really too much too ask? Is there no company out there that wa

Yes it would cost and they may not have the option too.Google has requirements for a device to get the App Market. It pretty much has to be a phone. Most tablets don't have the App Market. Also by creating their own app market they can make money off the apps. It is really that simple. So yes it will cost them money.Now I do feel B&N not putting the Kindle app on their reader is dumb as a box of rocks. I like a lot of people already have a Kindle. I would love to get this and use it as a reader and if t

That is why I said most. The Galaxy is the only one I know that does have the market. I am not sure if the requirement is 3G data or maybe you can make calls for the Galaxy?Google may also require GPS,compass , and or a camera for all I know. Which may be why the Galaxy tablet is so expensive and why the app market might not be an option for the Nook.

I use a Sony Ebook reader for many years. I will gladly buy a new one if it can run Android/TABLET features. E-ink displays are more comfortable than any backlit display.
Meanwhile waiting for a DUAL SIM Android phone...

If I buy a $70 ebook for a class, finish the class, then want to sell the ebook, will I ever be able to do that? A year ago there was speculation about possibly sending the original publisher a cut every time such a transfer took place in a dedicated market, a type of ebay for ebooks. Anyone know of more recent developments on this? This is one of the biggest turn offs for me with digital content, steam especially.

The whole point of B&N (or Amazon) releasing their own e-reader is to lock people into buying e-books exclusively from them. I'm wiling to bet that they subsidize the cost of their devices in exchange for the expected profits from this vendor lock-in. If so, then every Nook that isn't used to buy e-books, or that is used to buy e-books from a rival source, represents a net loss for B&N. Allowing the Nook Color to remain rooted would encourage just such alternative uses, which is why I don't expect it to be tolerated.

The whole point of B&N (or Amazon) releasing their own e-reader is to lock people into buying e-books exclusively from them. I'm wiling to bet that they subsidize the cost of their devices in exchange for the expected profits from this vendor lock-in. If so, then every Nook that isn't used to buy e-books, or that is used to buy e-books from a rival source, represents a net loss for B&N. Allowing the Nook Color to remain rooted would encourage just such alternative uses, which is why I don't expect it to be tolerated.

While Barnes and Noble would love it if you buy books from then, the Nook and Nook Color support Adobe Digital Editions and Overdrive. I can checkout books from my local library system as well. You can also buy books from any seller that supports epub and. So unlike Amazon, B&N does NOT have you locked into their store at all.

For Amazon, they likely subsidize the cost of the cell service with ebooks. The costs of device is like the cost of the device, even if it only covers fixed cots.

The reader is only part of the equation. One can perfectly well buy eBook from Amazon, for example, without paying for a Kindle. Amazon ebooks can be read on any number of devices. The same may be true for Nook. It is not so true for media sold through Apple.

The point of an eBook reader is so the consumer buys ebooks. Without a reader, the

The whole point of B&N (or Amazon) releasing their own e-reader is to lock people into buying e-books exclusively from them.

Then why do many readers (including both the Nook and Kindle)accept DRM-free content from other sources. And, I believe, the Nook even accepts DRM-laden content from other sources using compatible DRM.

Because, that seems incompatible with locking people in to buying from the vendor's store exclusively.

Now, buy bundling the vendor's store with the product and making it convenient,

It's actually locked down something fierce. Unlike Amazon, where you get free 3G, the nook's 3G is limited to B&N only. You cannot go anywhere else unless you can bounce it through B&N's servers. Access to anything else (via the web browser) is WiFi-only.

(Yes, you can do that - it's how carriers can differentiate between a featurephone dataplan, a blackberry dataplan, a smartphone dataplan, tethering plan, and full VPN dataplans. All overring various

My understanding is that the Nook is basically a loss leader, with the difference made up on book sales. With it rooted that opens it to kindle or whatever else...while its good for the end user (heck im thinking I need one now) B&N is likely going to completely freak out. The likely reaction is a swift essential "update" that blocks the current exploit.