1. Copy-n-paste what your question is about from the Member's forum, someones Yes/No forum, or any Member Q&A Dialogue into Question & Answer Dialogue forum; then hit New Topic button and paste your copy in the New Topic box.

2. Put members nicl-(x) number, e.g. nicl-1 or Yes/No persons name in Subject rectangle followed by the subject of question. For a long question, add more at top of Topic box.

3. Remember you take turns, checking an "I agree" or a "this is my last response" ends your part in the dialogue, and the other person gets the last word.

4. Finally, read and reread the Q&A procedures. They are meant to treat both sides of a Dialogue impartially.

Post subject: How to use a circle to relate 'e' to Phi on a Moebius
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:57 pm

12-4-15 Intead of 3/4 radius used below, use 3.6 of any radius of 3.718 length. You will find taking the square root of (3.6^ + 2.718^) and dividing by 2.718 will equal .618, this is the e!phi ratio using the AB length described below as your unit of measure. All tied together with the Pythagorean Theorem. There are implications for FTL navigation and how we decide on putting numbers on our objective units of measure.

10-22-15 Why Does This "possible" Geometric Discovery Make Interstellar FTL Navigation Possible?? Answer comes out of doing the below work. The 1-17-2009 how/to is inaccurate, but captures the gist.

This needs a diagram. I am going to restate the 3 questions below later today and re-describe method.

What is important is what it means if this relationship is true. It was not a deduction, but an observation as I was working with a imperfect hand drawn circle. In short my unconscious saw the relationship.

What it means is we can use not just the radius as our base unit of measuring a circle, but a more useful, precise, and accurate base unit of geometric comparison for circles and there derivative geometries.

1-17-2009 Found an error thanks to my son which refined the question. Please remember, this was deduced from an observation as I used the process described below. The question of relating e to phi using a circle never occurred to me before, nor to anyone else to my knowledge.

Mathematical and scientific IMPLICATIONS below the recipe for construction.

First QUESTION

1. Given that any circle of radius = 1 unit, construct the left quadrant of a circle and denote left end of horizontal radius by A, center end by B, and the up 3/4 point on vertical radius by C; then
2. draw a perpendicular at C that intersects left circumference at e|phi; then
3. from e|phi drop a line perpendicular to horizontal radius AB at D; so does
4. DC/AD = e?

Second QUESTION

1. Create the hypotenuse of triangle DBe|phi = Be|phi which equals radius of circle; then
2. rotate up line length DB keeping B at same location and
lay it on hypotenuse e|phiB ending at E; then
3. from E drop a line perpendicular to horizontal radius AB at F; so does
4. AF/FB = phi?

Third QUESTION

1. Draw a line from E to A intersecting line e|phiA at G; so does
2. DG/Ge|phi = phi?

After definitions I describe my initial cumbersome method

Definitions:

"e" is Napier's Constant or Euler's Number. It describes how fast growth or decay occurs per n units of interval like time. e.g. compound interest. e = 2.718..... and it is irrational.

"Phi" is the Golden Ratio first shown by Euclid in his definition of the Extreme to Mean ratio; "A straight line is said to have been cut in extreme and mean ratio when, as the whole line is to the greater segment, so is the greater to the lesser.".

It is these boundaries of Phi and phi defined by the basic math operations between the two and the results that end in whole numbers or include .618 with a whole number that are interesting and define the margins of a Moebius. More later.

Using Phi ensures that our logical units are of equal size. No equal sized units = no logic = no geometry = no science.

A "circle" is based upon pi = 3.1415...., also irrational, and obtained by dividing Circumference(Cir) by its diameter(Dia).

"Bowtie Point" of a Moebius strip: There is one and only one point on the outer edge of any Moebius strip that you can draw a perpendicular line down to the middle of the bottom side of a Moebius. It looks like a perfect 'bowtie' centered on one point. Look and you will see.

Ergo, a Moebius has a built in origin 'it' can use to see itself with; i.e. to use as the center of its built-in circle based Cartesian co-ordinate system.

Ergo, tying these two apparently independent base logical constants, 'e' and Phi, to our circle based geometric operation constant, "pi", through the unit 1 defined by Phi, is a very big scientific discovery.

This Prediction Requires Independent Verification Fast.

I was looking for something else on a circle using a straight edge and saw the relationship. I am quite sure it implies you can square the circle with a straight edge and that all the other logical and physical constants can be related using it. BUT that means it has to be publicly tested first. My old eyeballs are not a conclusive test. (Some mathematician asserted to prove that one could not square a circle with a straight edge about two years ago. I wonder if he used a
straight edge to do so?)

INITIAL DIRECTIONS posted several months ago. I did not do the rotation of the line

1. Make a perfect right angled cross.

2. Center a circle on the cross's intersection; thus creating a horizontal and vertical diameter for any circle. Let A denote center of circle, B = left end of horizontal diameter, and C = top end of vertical diameter.

3. The following operation works in either direction for both vertical and horizontal diameters, i.e. left/right or up/down. Showing the operation with one does for all = eight points can be generated.

4. Sub-divide the vertical radius twice, i.e. first in half; then the upper half again = 3/4 radius up.

5. At upper 3/4 point on the vertical radius (or any of the other three radii), make a perpendicular line extending to the Circumference of circle on both sides. (What shall we call these eight points? Lets try 'e|phi' points for base logical constant points.).

6. DEFINE 'e' by dropping a perpendicular down to the horizontal diameter's left radius AB where A = center of circle, at D from our left hand e|phi point on circumference.

7. PREDICTION: Multiplying DB times 2.718 = radius where B is left end of horizontal diameter.

8. DEFINE Phi by using left horizontal radius to create another pair of e|phi points along left horizontal radius.

10. Since eight of these points can be generated, a left and right one for each of the four radii; then these e|phi points can be used to combine or locate all other points and there geometric relationships to any other point(s) on the surface of a sphere(circle) or a Moebius strip, both outside or inside these circle based geometries.

A fact: This geometric operation has never been demonstrated before on Earth in ancient or modern mathematical literature: Using only a straight edge, do a double sub-division on the radius of a circle, centered on a cross, to find the eight single point(s) on the Circumference that define 'e' with respect to Phi for the four radii.

This is the fundamental geometric and thus logical discovery, that shows how we are tied into the universe. It directly ties our symbols made of reality to the Moebius strip geometry that we and our universe are based upon. Thus, a Moebius' bowtie point, by inspection, gives us
an 'objective' common to all, neutral origin to see ourselves from.

Since this these e|Phi points are a falsifiable assertion, falsify away. Questions Please.

Questions Implied:
1. When does the percentage(%) decrease in a vertical radii, e.g. AC equal the % decrease in AB, the base radii?
It almost certainly must be a several more sub-divisions, my guess is the 12th. but that is an even number, and the farthest we can go in a Moebius must always end in an odd number. More thoughts in equation log.

2. Viewpoint is crucial here. Vertical and horizontal are defined with respect to the observer, the manipulator of the circle. Remember there are eight possible e|phi points.

Clearly we must explicitly include this distinction in our choice of which radius is first shortening the most; so "How do we explicitly include where and how the observer fits into this observation?". Answer seems to me would require left/right, up/down, and front/back(see/not see) be explicitly assigned or assumed in starting your operations. e.g. the cross in the circle is built by observer.

Implications
1. Showing how these "e" and "Phi/phi = 1" can be related together with a simple straight edge operation on a circle ties 1, 0, pi, e, and phi together. These are our base numbers(0 and 1), the base geometric operation that generates a circle(pi), and the two logical constants(e and Phi) upon which all scientific descriptions of our universe rest. Ergo, how we can use these logical constants to create and compare scientific observations we can all 'agree we see' = 'objective' at the base level of our universe.

2. We people of Earth have been UNCONSCIOUS of how we work. Since it is done by straight edge = any unit; then we 'Moebius based spirits' are using these constants "unconsciously" to create and live in our life forms.

3. By implication, all the other known constants in our Moebius geometry universe are also implied.

4. Unconscious ensures death sooner or later.

What Was I Initially Looking For and Why?

I was looking for the angles of the triangle that measured the distance between the two sides of the surface of a Moebius at its mid-line = a circle. I started with a triangle based on the upper left quadrant of a circle. Lets call this triangle ABC with A at center of circle, B at left Circumference(Cir) and C at top vertice. Along the way, I asked the question:

When you shorten the vertical radius AC of this initial ABC triangle by one unit; then the horizontal base AB initially does not shorten as much as AC.

So I asked this question:

At what point on the circle's Cir does the absolute amount of shortening along both arms of this triangle go equal?

The Answer turned out to be one of the circle's e|phi points.

I did this by eyeball on a actual circle. When I drew the line from the e|phi point on the Cir down to the horizontal diameter at point D, I realized that DB times 2.718 might equal AB. After rechecking, I concluded it does.

(MISTAKE made here. In correcting the mistake, I asked the top question.) Next, I checked for Phi by using the hypotenuse e|phiA of the triangle ADe|phi and dividing by AD, i.e. e|phiA/AD and it equaled 1.618 = Phi. (WHY WRONG?
Hypotenuse is the radius, so AD/radius can not both define e and Phi.)

I flash hunched about the double sub-division of the vertical radius generating the e|phi point the next day.

This is, of course, a falsifiable assertion. I at first said here, MAKE MY DAY, show this prediction wrong and my whole theory would be wrong, and I could live with that. That's not true. I would not like living in a universe that makes no sense, where there is no accountability, no conservation, no meaning. So MAKE MY DAY and confirm this fast please. The future of life on Earth depends upon your fast confirmation._________________"I swear to speak honestly and seek the truth when I use the No 1st Cost List public record."

Last edited by Dan on Sat Dec 05, 2015 8:24 am; edited 3 times in total

Post subject: Re: How to use a circle to relate 'e' to Phi on a Moebius
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:15 am

It is interesting that no one has noticed this discovery yet. But then I have not pushed it yet._________________"I swear to speak honestly and seek the truth when I use the No 1st Cost List public record."

Post subject: Re: How to use a circle to relate 'e' to Phi on a Moebius
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:16 am

Since the universe is spirit = a self replicating by sub dividing Moebius; then at the level we see it from i.e. from our life forms implies a 'point of observation' can be from any very small point on the surface.

Raises question: Which point is best?

Answer is that it must involve Bowtie point or more properly the Bowtie Line._________________"I swear to speak honestly and seek the truth when I use the No 1st Cost List public record."

Our leaders and thus most of you will not seek the truth about our real place in the universe. Why is explained by ignorance and self service. Until our society openly deals with this easy to resolve scientific disagreement, I must conclude we will not act to prevent Earth from being vaporized.These links deal directly with How to Prevent our Sun from exploding.

COPYRIGHT 2018 No 1st Cost List, Patent# 8566730
issued 10/22/2013
The logos and trademarks used on this site are the property of their respective owners.
We are not responsible for any information and comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster.
Unless you charge above actual copying expense, you may read, copy, reprint, incorporate or pass on to others in any form the material put on the No 1st Cost List public record for public and private benefit. When charging above actual copying expenses, except for accepted 'fair use', you must arrange terms of compensation with the author(s).