Letters: February 28

Budget deadline looms

The Republicans just don't seem to get the sequestration/deficit reduction deal. They agreed to write in such a drastic step that everyone would be forced to reach a compromise.

Now they seem to think it's a good idea, even though no one else does! Unbelievable! I guess they fooled us. They probably want the sequestration to happen. It doesn't matter that a majority of citizens would prefer a compromise that includes both cuts and new revenue sources or that we'll probably slip back into a recession or that national and personal safety will be compromised.

Do Republicans really think this is the way to win hearts and minds, let alone elections, and become relevant again? Even if you are inclined to be sympathetic to their ideas, just wait until a few of the vital services you depend on are cut. I suppose the howls that will carry all the way to Washington will still fall on some deaf ears.

If there are any rational minds left in the Republican Party (a big if, I realize) it ought to be clear to them by now that "No" is not a sound or effective governing philosophy.

- Peter YoungPensacola

Pensacola

Self-sufficiency

On March 1, we'll see if Congress misses its sequestration deadline. There are big issues causing infighting.

Some ask what would Jesus say? Would he provide fish or teach us how to fish? The New Testament teaches us how to live life, not simply provide cures.

Congress need not only make a deal, but ensure its programs lead to self-sufficiency.

- Marc LivanosPace

Pace

Cut aid

If Republicans won't compromise on the sequester, we should immediately cut off financial aid to every country in the world we help. People will lose their jobs, adding to our high unemployment. Our military forces will be crippled. Why should we feed other countries' people, while some Americans are homeless and starving?

To their credit, Republicans like Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky said, ?Our goal is to block every plan Obama proposes."

They have tried, lied and vilified the president. Their objective is not fiduciary, but prejudice! They do not want a black or a woman president. They are terrified about the prospects of Hillary Clinton's possible presidential run in 2016. Some Republicans are apparently waging war against women's rights, to keep them home, barefoot and pregnant. They certainly don't intend to pay them the same as men, or give them control of their own bodies, heaven forbid!