On 8/4/10 11:40 PM, Andrew Coppin wrote:
> Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
>> Don't forget, GHC is open source: if this lack really was "dumb" and
>> annoying you, there was nothing stopping you from rectifying this
>> situation up until now.
>> Except that, in the real world, this is actually completely
> infeasible. Yes, I know it's the basic tenant of OSS that you can
> modify the program to do whatever you want. But in reality, something
> like GHC is far too large and complex for this to be a realistic
> possibility. And this holds for most other nontrivial software too.
>> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
>Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org>http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafeFair enough, but if one can't do better one's self then one should be
careful about calling the work of others "dumb", which was the original
point.
Cheers,
Greg