[ot]And here the matching anecdote.First I didn't see Paul's circling circle. *) So I thought the "He fell for it" was a kind of joke. But I was expecting that Paul should produce the css-animation in short time. Just to kill time I entertained myself in making a javascript version (difference: in js the rotating is going on as long as you hover; a backwards rotating onmouseout could be added) . I'm not sure I did that If I had seen the simple css transform solution!

*) The html code in #3 was still static, and Paul's link you can do this all in CSS I didn't remark because of the rather strong incoming lamp light on my monitor."Color is not used as the only visual means of conveying information, indicating an action, prompting a response, or distinguishing a visual element. (Level A)" - WCAG guideline 1.4!That's the reason I always underline my links by hand (afraid of somebody missing the link - and the work, in case it is an example). But in my opinion the deleting of the standard link underlining is a principal accessibility sin of the forum...- I posted a separate message about this in the Forum Support & Feedback directory.[/ot]

You guys are truly amazing! This is just food for thought and obviously I'm very behind with my CSS because I'm trying to figure out what's going on (no problem with the rotation but with the camera itself)

I would have thought that if you didn't use an image, you could use svg... but not only CSS

@Paul_O_B; that's a really sweet link. It should go in your "this week in CSS" thread