You might be surprised that Greenpeace was at an agribusiness conference. The room was full of agri-business people, who are not the crowd we normally engage with; they are the crowd we normally challenge with our campaigns. However, I appreciated having the opportunity to be a dissenting voice and to talk about how ecological farming is a more resilient and sustainable model to produce diverse and healthy food in the face of erratic climate patterns.

Small scale organic farmer inspecting a soya field in Parana. Photo credit: Greenpeace

The model of farming we choose can either make us more vulnerable, or help us both to be more resilient to our changing climate and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. We cannot afford to endlessly discuss the effects of global climate change on agriculture and do nothing about it. In fact, the impacts of climate change—like massive droughts, typhoons and storms—are already appearing and are consistent with climate change scenario predictions. The time for debate is over. Now is the time to tackle the problem head-on with real solutions.

One approach—the one that many of the Global Agribusiness Forum attendees support—is continuing to expand the chemical-intensive industrial agriculture model. Yet, this model has already shown itself to be fundamentally flawed and unable to address the climate challenges the world is already experiencing. In fact, it firstly requires stable climates and optimal growing conditions for highly specialized seeds to achieve high yields. Second, the model relies on vast areas of monoculture (large scale planting of a single crop), which harm biodiversity. Third, this model is also dependent on expensive chemical products (pesticides and fertilizers), which lead to farmer indebtedness, heavily pollute the environment, damage natural biodiversity and are based on fossil fuels. The fossil fuel dependence, in particular, means that as fossil fuel prices rise, food prices rise, causing increased suffering for the world’s poor people.

A better approach to ensure food production under challenging climatic conditions is ecological farming, a system based on diversity of nature to produce food for all: the diversity of seeds and plants; the diversity of many different crops grown at the same time in the same field; the diversity of insects which pollinate (like bees) or eliminate pests; the diversity of farming systems mixing crops with livestock. The result is a diverse range of food that is healthy for both people and the planet.

A good example of how ecological farming builds resilience to climate change is growing crops with beans, which are protein-rich and flavorful, but also can help play a role in climate adaptation. Scientists from Wageningen University in the Netherlands recently found that beans greatly improve poor soils, increase productivity of maize when grown with them, and respond well to drought. They also have multiple uses for food, animal feed, and soil fertility. These scientists found that growing maize and beans next to each other increased income by 67 percent without the use of any chemical fertilizers and farmers were interested in adopting it.

All eyes are now on emerging economies—Brazil, China and India—who together produce and consume the majority of food on the planet. As the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, released today, points out, our food system is going to be impacted negatively, especially in these countries. It is very possible that climate change will bring the economic development of these crucial regions to a virtual standstill. However, this is not inevitable.

The solutions of ecological farming exist and can be built upon to create a new food future. And, Brazil has a strong ecological farming movement that has already succeeded in achieving a national policy on agroecology (the science of ecological farming). They can help to lead the way. But, alongside the ecological farming model, Brazil is investing heavily in expanding industrial agriculture. Thus, Brazil currently has two parallel models that can not co-exist together: one based on growing food with the diversity of nature, that is healthy for people and the planet; the other based on chemical-intensive monocultures to grow commodity crops for export that mostly feed animals. However, only by shifting financial resources to support widescale uptake of ecological farming will Brazil show global leadership and become a beacon of modern and innovative agriculture.

Other countries are looking to Brazil to share their experiences, especially those in Africa, a region desperately in need of a system that can not only sufficiently feed people but also face the most dramatic manifestations of climate change. As an African, I can tell you that Africa doesn’t need or want the chemical-intensive industrial agriculture model. What Africa wants is for Brazil to share its successes with ecological farming and show the entire world that ecological farming is indeed the only path to ensure healthy food for people, protect the environment and cope with climate change.

The
“U.S. Seasonal Drought Outlook” map released March 20 by the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration depicts the wide extent of the
persistence of severe drought in the Southwest, from California to
Texas, and into Mexico, for March 20 to June 20, conforming to the
larger pattern of lessened solar activity. Many Federal, state, and
local community proposals are being put forward to speed up
authorization and construction for more dams here and there—a nice
impulse—to store more water.

But what water do they expect to store there?

It would be a mirage, without an end to Wall Street, and an all-out
drive for a crash-productive nuclear power commitment, and for NAWAPA
XXI. Make that break with Wall Street, and all kinds of short-term,
emergency measures for food and priority water provision become
possible.

On March 26, Texas U.S. Senate candidate Kesha Rogers delivered this
message to a conference in Mexico City; she and Michael Steger,
Congressional candidate in San Francisco, are leading a joint
California-Texas campaign to see this through.

The Texas agricultural extension service put out a summary report
last week from their West Texas county agents in the Panhandle, South
Plains and Rolling Plains, describing the “very difficult” conditions
for farming and ranching. In Knox County (east of Lubbock County, and
south of the Panhandle), cotton farmers are trying to prepare their
planting beds, in between dust storms! Midland and other city centers
have turned dark with dust at different times. The March 28 Houston Chronicle and March 31 San Francisco Chronicle ran comparative photos of the 1930s’ and today’s dust storms in the region, under a “Dust Bowl” headline.

bonnielou

Growing maize and beans together, along with squash, is what the Native American Indians did, known as the 3 sisters. This combination provided most nutritional needs, supplemented by hunting for wild game.

ChezKiva

“The time for debate is over.” WRONG! -PBS, et. all, have convinced the non-science community that through reduced greenhouse emissions we can control, or at least re-direct the weather on this planet. The truth is we can’t control a sold-out corporate media.

You, {the aversely affected,} seem to be completely unaware of the daily NATO-GLOBAL CHEMTRAILING, and the corresponding use of HAARP to direct these huge disparities in temperature and cloud cover.