Harvey Weinstein is on the verge of being ostracized from the glittering circles he spent years building. On Thursday, a shocking report by The New York Times detailed numerous sexual harassment allegations that have been lobbed at the Weinstein Company head over nearly the last 30 years. Figures including Ashley Judd spoke on the record, while it was reported that women including Rose McGowan were paid settlements by Weinstein to avoid messy lawsuits that would publicly air his alleged behavior. Now the Democratic politicians Weinstein spent years courting are starting to pull away from him, re-routing his financial donations to charitable causes. Meanwhile, the board for the Weinstein Company is scheduled to meet this week to decide their figurehead’s fate once and for all.

According to Variety, politicians Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) spurred the anti-Weinstein movement, announcing that he would give the movie producer’s $2,700 campaign donation to charity. Per his spokesman, the money will now go to the “Women’s Fund at the Vermont Community Foundation, specifically the Change the Story Initiative.”

Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) quickly followed suit, announcing that their Harvey-backed donations will also go to charity.

“Women shouldn’t have to face sexual harassment at work,” the Heinrich campaign said. “Martin is giving Mr. Weinstein’s donation to Community Against Violence.”

Heinrich had received $5,400 from Weinstein. Blumenthal, who received the same amount, will donate his portion to the Connecticut Alliance to End Sexual Violence.

Outside of Hollywood, Weinstein built a reputation as a strong Democratic supporter, donating at least $1.4 million to candidates, parties, and political action committees over the years, per Variety. The Republican National Committee has already seized on this fact, slamming Democrats for aligning themselves with a man known for predatory behavior. “Democrats and the DNC truly stand up for women like they say they do, then returning this dirty money should be a no-brainer,” chairwoman Ronna McDaniel said in a statement.

Now that a few senators have announced they are donating the money they received from Weinstein to charity, other politicians will likely come to the fore, responding to the pressure to quickly withdraw themselves from Weinstein’s newly chaotic narrative. The Oscar winner was deeply embedded in political circles, throwing glitzy fund-raising events for Hillary Clinton and palling around with Barack and Michelle Obama.Malia Obama, an aspiring filmmaker, even interned at the Weinstein Company.

The fallout has also breached Weinstein’s personal and professional life. The board of directors for the Weinstein Company, which he runs with his brother, Bob, is reportedly having a meeting this week to decide Harvey’s future. In the wake of the report, Weinstein is currently taking a leave of absence from the company. “It’s unclear if Weinstein will be suspended or forced out of the company entirely,” Variety notes. “He has an ownership stake in the studio that could complicate any moves to oust him.”

Through all this, Weinstein has not exactly remained silent. He released a rambling statement to the Times, admitting that he used to behave in an unacceptable manner (without getting specific) even as his lawyer denied some of the accusations. His lawyers also announced that they plan to file a $50 million lawsuit against the Times. Weinstein then spoke to Page Six, denying Ashley Judd’s allegations against him and explaining the reason for the lawsuit. “The reason I am suing is because of the Times’s inability to be honest with me, and their reckless reporting,” Weinstein said. “They told me lies.”

Former U.S. secretary of state John Kerry discusses “impact investing” and “venture charity” with Bill McGlashan, co-founder and C.E.O. of the Rise Fund, and Walter Isaacson, president and C.E.O. of the Aspen Institute.