High court to decide case over RESPA fees

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to clarify the scope of a federal law meant to protect homebuyers from being overcharged for real estate settlement services.
The question the court will resolve is whether a provision of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act banning service providers from charging for services they did not actually render applies only when the unearned fees are split between two or more parties.
Three circuit courts have ruled that the law applies to any unearned fees, whether retained by a single defendant or multiple defendants. The Department of Housing and Urban Development's position is in line with these rulings.
Four circuit courts have issued opinions taking the opposing view, ruling that "this provision prohibits the acceptance of unearned fees only when those fees are divided with a culpable third party, as in a kickback arrangement," said the high court in its order granting the writ of certiorari in the case, Freeman v. Quicken Loans. A similar attempt to have a case against Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems heard by the Supreme Court was not successful.
The case, brought by Louisiana residents Tammy Foret Freeman and Larry Scott Freeman, alleges Quicken charged them a $980 loan discount fee on a mortgage loan in 2007. Though that fee is normally imposed in exchange for a lower interest rate, Quicken did not reduce the Freemans' interest rate, they charge in their complaint.
Quicken Loans acknowledged charging the loan discount fee but denied the remainder of the allegations. "Quicken Loans has never charged unearned fees and never will," said the firm in a statement earlier this year.
The Obama administration asked the high court to accept the home buyers’ appeal and overturn a lower court ruling in favor of Quicken Loans, which was upheld by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Write to Liz Enochs.

This month inHousingWire magazine

Eight years after we began recognizing women for their influential work in the expanding housing and mortgage finance ecosystem, a traditionally male-dominated field, our Women of Influence list is bigger and better than ever! This year, we honor 85 women who are making lasting achievements in each sector of the housing economy. Read on to learn more about these accomplished women and the strides they are making in their industry segments.

Feature

The financial world at large is experimenting with changing its workforce culture in ways not fathomable 10 years ago. For example, in 2011, the dress code for female workers at UBS came to light with unflattering results. In it, the Swiss bank instructed female employees on not just how to dress and how to smell, but also preached the importance for ladies to apply lotion after taking showers. Fast forward to today and fellow Swiss bank, Credit Suisse has now created an official role to boost equal opportunities and create a fair treatment environment. Has the American mortgage industry made similar progress?

Commentary

The conversation around student loan debt and its economic impact on Millennials, those born from 1980 to 1998, has some questioning whether the future of the American Dream is in jeopardy. The nation’s student loan debt has soared to $1.4 trillion, surpassing credit cards in becoming the largest source of personal debt outside a mortgage.