A U.S. Cap-and-Trade System to Address Global Climate Change

Oct 30, 2007

Contributors

The Problem

In a few short years, mounting scientific evidence has transformed Americans’ perception of climate change. Environmental and economic concerns demand that a market-based domestic U.S. climate policy be enacted to provide meaningful reductions in carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gasses (GHGs). Any policy, however, should be underpinned by environmental effectiveness, cost effectiveness, and distributional equity.

The Proposal

A cap-and-trade system—wherein the government caps the level of CO2 emissions by issuing a limited number of allowances, and polluting firms must surrender those allowances for each unit of CO2 emitted—is the only market mechanism that ensures a chosen level of emissions reduction. Under this proposal the burden is placed on energy producers rather than energy consumers, emissions levels would reduce gradually, and the allowances would be tradable among CO2-producing firms.

Abstract

The need for a domestic U.S. policy that seriously addresses climate change is increasingly apparent. A cap-and-trade system is the best approach in the short to medium term. Besides providing certainty about emissions levels, cap-and-trade offers an easy means of compensating for the inevitably unequal burdens imposed by climate policy; it is straightforward to harmonize with other countries’ climate policies; it avoids the current political aversion in the United States to taxes; and it has a history of successful adoption in this country.

The paper proposes a specific cap-and-trade system with several key features including an upstream cap on CO2 emissions with gradual inclusion of other greenhouse gases, a gradual downward trajectory of emissions ceilings over time to minimize disruption and allow firms and households time to adapt, and mechanisms to reduce cost uncertainty. Initially, half of the program’s allowances would be allocated through auctioning and half through free distribution, primarily to those entities most burdened by the policy.

This should help limit potential inequities while bolstering political support. The share distributed for free would phase out over twenty-five years. The auctioned allowances would generate revenue that could be used for a variety of worthwhile public purposes. The system would provide for linkage with international emissions reduction credit arrangements, harmonization over time with effective cap-and-trade systems in other countries, and appropriate linkage with other actions taken abroad that maintains a level playing field between imports and import-competing domestic products.