ATS member independently makes similar discovery to NASA EM Thruster

I'm in the process of independently verifying our Fellow ATS'er which will take couple of weeks. If it I could replicate his results successfully,
I will post the BIG NEWS here and I will share everything. This is for a non-profit, open-source venture.

Since I saw the article on NASA confirms new EM thruster violates conservation of momentum, I feel inclined to make post here regarding the parallels
of his invention to the NASA find.

They could probably be derived from ***Maxwell Relativity***. Since the curved electric field I suspect is a **relativistic phenomena** - the
electric fields "think" they are still going straight lines but to an outside observer, they are curved.

Mr. Roger Shawyer's EM thruster (Wired article):

but critics reject his ***relativity-based theory*** and insist that, according to the law of conservation of momentum, it cannot
work.

***it defies Newton's Third Law***. Anyone who knows what they're doing should be able to verify it themselves using the design and steps I
gave above and their own means for scientific verification.

Mr. Roger Shawyer's EM thruster (Wired article):

but the drive actually produced 30 to 50 micronewtons -- less than a thousandth of the Chinese results, but emphatically a positive result,
***in spite of the law of conservation of momentum***:

Conservation of Momentum is closely related to Newton's 3rd Law (Classic). Mr. Ahnggk confirmed that thrust is not produced by radiation pressure
(Thust is far greater than calculated radiation pressure at max power), so it certainly violates Conservation of Momentum as well.

And it all started with a British engineer whose invention was ignored and ridiculed in his home country.

Mr Ahnggk was also severely ridiculed and criticized by fellow ATS members here despite the open-source nature of the project, even sharing the fine
details of the project (eliminating the possibility of a scam). He was also accused of being a troll and mentally deluded. But these latest
developments in Space Propulsion is proving the soundness of his theories.

I'm hoping to finish my verification of Mr. Ahnggk's invention. I already got all the materials I need, just waiting for an opportune time. But I
will share all my results here, even steps to verify it yourselves.

I love it when one of our members does some real world work, and actually investigates or creates something using science as a guide.

But this is a whole other level of awesome, and I cannot wait to hear more on this fascinating subject, and to hear the results of your verification
process, although I have to say that the real test will be whether or not it will actually work in the practical sense, by which I mean, while
attached to a space going vehicle!

I saw the article on NASA confirms new EM thruster violates conservation of momentum

Nasa did not confirm any such thing. That was a spin added by the thread starter, AnarchoCapitalist, who believes in free energy, electric universe
theories and some other popular pseudoscientific ideas. Needless to say, a physical object that violates conservation laws cannot possibly exist.

Neither NASA not Roger Shawyer, the inventor of EmDrive, claim that it violates any physical laws at all.

Here's a quote from the ATS member in question, Ahgnnk:

I almost completely forgot about my warp drive now. These days, I'm far more interested in the paranormal and spiritual due to the strange things
I encountered during my experiments.

His 'warp drive' is a flat piece of polystyrene with bits of aluminium and copper glued on to it.

Looking at the plans China used it looks simple to make. I'd like to see it field tested, but if it works like many have said it'll be a nice step
to space travel, even if it isn't manned space travel.

I have been reading about this microwave thruster for some time now.
After reading the test results for NASA I am beginning to wonder if a similar amount of power could not also be generated by shining a halogen lamp
onto a mirror while blocking its light on the other side?
The amount of electrical energy should be about the same and you can get a few halogen bulbs at Wal-mart.
The bulbs would be lighter, and simpler, than a microwave unit , or should I say have less mass, and you can use the same cord plugged into the wall.

originally posted by: sosobad
As far as I can tell Johndeere2020 and ahnggk are the same person, if you look at ahnggk's last thread, some astute member figured it out. Why are
you promoting your work posing as someone else?

As he said himself

Mr Ahnggk was also severely ridiculed and criticized by fellow ATS members here despite the open-source nature of the project,

Have you managed to build one of these yet? Once you do, can you build one big enough to lift your car or something that size? I read about a lot of
these sort of projects quite often on ATS, and I do not ever see anyone actually build one. Build it, and upload some HD video to Youtube for everyone
to see.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.