How Should Charter Schools Be Held Accountable?

February 21, 2017Mikhail Zinshteyn for EWA

In the contentious debates over what is a good school, parents
are frequently pitted against public officials. The stakes are
especially high for charter schools, which periodically must be
granted a new lease on life.

It’s a case of one side pointing to test scores or compliance
with various rules of operation, and the other invoking their
satisfaction with the school in ways that may be hard to measure.
While regulators may be tempted to close a low-performing school,
parents regularly object.

The tension brings into question whether popular opinion or
data-driven results define the quality — and value — of a
public school. Such themes were on full display during a recent
conference on
charter schools hosted by the Education Writers Association.

A ‘Value-Laden Statement’

“The word accountability is such a value-laden statement, and one
that everyone ascribes a different meaning to,” said Robin Lake,
the director of the Center on Reinventing Public Education.

One key question, Lake said, is “accountable to whom?” – parents,
government contracts or even the market? Other questions, she
said, are accountability for what and “with what consequence?”

Lake also took issue with the heavy focus on comparing
charters with traditional public schools. Instead, she advocates
“looking at the city as a whole” and whether all students are
improving irrespective of the school’s governance structure.

Families served by charter schools may not feel loyalty to the
sector, said Richard Gray, an education expert at Brown
University’s Annenberg Institute for School Reform, because they
care more about a single school’s fit for their kids than
politically charged education policy.

“Parents will have kids in charter schools and they’ll also be
fighting against charter schools coming to their communities,”
said Gray. “Because it isn’t about ‘Is it a charter school,’ it’s
about, ’How is it a charter school?’ … It’s the values attached
to that charter school.”

The discussion turned to Detroit, where debates over charters
have become a flashpoint. In that city, charter schools on
average marginally outperform traditional schools, based on
research
from the Center for Research on Education Outcomes at
Stanford University). Lake argued that even though both sectors
in Detroit have performed poorly, parents welcome their options.

“All the parents that we have spoken to were very, very happy to
have more choices. They felt empowered,” she said. “There are
things coming from it that are real that we cannot discount.”

Panelist Greg Richmond said two key ingredients in accountability
are the state laws that allow for the creation of charter schools
and the charter authorizers — the state-approved entities
responsible for approving charter schools, overseeing them, and
granting them renewal. Richmond, who heads the National
Association of Charter School Authorizers, said California is one
of several states that doesn’t require charter schools to sign
contracts with authorizers that spell out the explicit
obligations for both parties. Richmond sees this as problematic.

“That contract should spell out what’s required of the school,
… not just in terms of academic performance, but how do they
operate,” he said.

Lake said that Detroit has more than a dozen charter authorizers,
many of which aren’t even located in the city.
Richmond wrote in 2014 that California has more than 300
authorizers, some overseeing just one or two schools. (The
majority of charter authorizers nationwide are school districts,
though other types include universities, nonprofit organizations,
or state bodies created explicitly for that purpose.)

The Problem of ‘Bad Authorizing’

Richmond urged reporters to dig more into the role authorizers
play when they write about struggling charter schools.

“Most of the problems … are actually problems of bad
authorizing,” he said. The authorizer should be monitoring the
schools on behalf of the public and take action if they fail to
meet their obligations, including potentially closing them down,
he said.

When charters are underperforming, the panelists were split on
which reforms worked best. Gray said closing schools isn’t a good
approach.

“People are seeing the ravages in their communities from closing
schools,” he said. “Parents are telling us that when you close a
school in our community, it devastates that community.” Gray’s
group released a report in
2014 that was critical of school closure.

Richmond’s organization, meanwhile, has called for the closing of
1,000 charter schools as part of a campaign
to send one million students to higher-quality schools that
are vetted by strong authorizers. He said the number of closures
is increasing.

“Closing a school is very unpopular among everyone involved,”
said Richmond. “We’d all be happy if it never had to happen … but
you have to ask yourself, what else have we got?”

Related Posts

Kriste Dragon grew up in Atlanta, a mixed-race child in a
segregated school system.

When it came time to find a school for her children in her new
Hollywood home, Dragon was hopeful that the neighborhood’s
highly
diverse demographics would be reflected in its schools. But
instead, she found a low-performing school system that was as
segregated — or worse — as what she’d experienced growing up.

At 10 years old, Audrey Campos is the one who helps her
18-year-old cousin communicate with their grandparents. Unlike
her cousin, Audrey speaks Spanish. That’s thanks, in part, to the
public school she attends, part of the Camino Nuevo Charter
Academy network.

Audrey was in the inaugural kindergarten class for the school’s
bilingual program in 2011. She spent 80 percent of her day
learning in Spanish that first year, though now Audrey speaks and
hears mostly English in school.