Activity

Oops, I missed it for deb packaging - sorry about that ;(
As for RPM: the packaging dependency is actually there. It looks like this:

hadoop -> bigtop-utils -> bigtop-groovy

And I think this is better that making hadoop to be dependent on bigtop-groovy directly for a simple reason: there's nothing in hadoop proper that needs such tie. I believe the same logic would apply to deb

Konstantin Boudnik
added a comment - 02/Apr/15 19:18 Oops, I missed it for deb packaging - sorry about that ;(
As for RPM: the packaging dependency is actually there. It looks like this:
hadoop -> bigtop-utils -> bigtop-groovy
And I think this is better that making hadoop to be dependent on bigtop-groovy directly for a simple reason: there's nothing in hadoop proper that needs such tie. I believe the same logic would apply to deb