Institutional racism is still a reality in the US where Hindus, along
with other racial and religious minorities continue to live in the
midst of racism, bigotry and xenophobia. Places of learning are not
exempt from racism either; for instance, my university (University of
Illinois) still uses a racist Native American mascot despite years of
protest and strong disapproval from the Native American community (and
their allies). It is therefore not at all surprising that the state
textbooks in California reflect some of that bigotry and ignorance of
"other" cultures. The textbooks were virtually crying out for revision,
but certainly not of the kind that Hindu supremacist (Hindutva) groups
like the Vedic Foundation, Hindu Education Foundation and the Hindu
American Foundation envisioned. As an Indian immigrant immensely proud
of my rich anti-imperialist heritage, I am appalled at the Hindutva
attempts to portray the California textbook controversy as a "white
versus brown" issue.

All writings of history are political, and caricatures against anyone
(particularly minorities) are clearly unacceptable. Caricatures
invariably demonize and vilify their subjects and/or portray them as
(dispensable) lesser humans. Orientalist blinkers in California
textbooks are apparent, for instance, in the description of Hanuman:
"The monkey king Hanuman loved Ram so much that it is said that he is
present every time the Ramayan is told. So look around--see any
monkeys?" (Come to think of it, I have not seen Jesus Christ or the
Virgin Mary either!) However, charges of racism against Michael Witzel
are inaccurate; he was standing up for historical accuracy, which is
not the equivalent of caricaturing brown people. The caste system, for
instance, does not caricature Hinduism; rather, it is a brutal social
reality in India, and has the sanction of several of the Hindu
scriptures, including the Vedas and the Bhagwad Gita. As explained in
the National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights' letter to the California State Board of Education,
"brutalities against Dalits continue to be justified on religious
grounds." Similarly, women's lower social status is a reality that is
often justified on religious grounds. Indeed, as painful as it is to
acknowledge these facts, it is incumbent upon those of us who have
escaped such oppressions (and have in fact benefited from the various
hierarchies) to publicly campaign against them. For whom much is given,
isn't it only fair for a little to be asked in return?

The Hindutva groups have also claimed that Hinduism has been singled
out for unfavorable treatment. This, again, is not true. As should be
the case, injustice in all cultures need to be brought out into the
open. Peace cannot be bought by erasing oppression from our minds but
only by working for justice. Infact, the California Board of Education
mandates teaching about "human rights issues (i.e. genocide, slavery,
and the Holocaust)". Middle school textbooks in California currently
teach about the persecution of Jews in medieval history, slavery in
early African civilizations, inquisition in the dark ages and so on.
The textbooks also do not shy away from discussing patriarchy in early
Western civilizations.

Sample these:
(i) "[E]ven educated [Athenian] women were not considered the equals of
men. They had no political rights and could not own property."
(ii) "Women in early Rome had some rights, but they did not have the
same status as men. The paterfamilias controlled his wife's activities."

Given their history of violence against religious and ethnic minorities
in India, it is obvious that the Hindutva groups' sudden love for
minority rights is a cheap tactical ploy. Hindutva interventions in
California have little to do with anti-racism and everything to do with
their zeal to "invent Indian history to suit the prejudices of
Hindutva" (in the words of Amartya Sen). This is evident from their
attempts at erasing the history of oppression of Dalits and in setting
up phony Dalit websites like dalithumanrights.com. And their denouncing
of "Dalit" as a "Marxist" term only preferred by the "fifth column of
Christian missionary fronts" and advocating the use of "Harijan" (a
moniker rejected by the Dalits) reminds me of local white paternalism
that continues to pass judgments on Native American culture and
persists in using demeaning Native American imagery.

Hindutva megalomania, if it did not have such profound effects on real
people, would have been so much fun. Their fantastic theories of
indigenous Aryans have all been derided by the research community (for
a clumsy attempt by NS Rajaram, see "Horseplay in Harappa", http://www.safarmer.com/frontline),
but their fantasies continue to grow unabated. A little research
reveals that the Hindutva organizations spearheading the California
interventions are no different. The Hindu Education Foundation's
"resources on Hinduism" page points to a website that seeks to
historify the mythical Pushpak Vimana
"which could fly at the speed of thought"! [http://www.atributetohinduism.com/Vimanas.htm]

Such historification of myths no way respects Hindu religious beliefs,
and if the intelligent design fiasco is any indicator, this is a sure
recipe for well-deserved derision. One can understand why Hindutva
ideologues keep harping on a glorified past, for how else can they
whitewash Hindutva's sordid history of imperialist collaboration (and
blame the "others" for all ills)? For the rest of us, however, there's
a lot to be proud of in our real history, a history of standing up to
the pre-eminent imperialist power of that time. History
and science belong to all of us, let's reclaim them from the forces of unreason.

The worst fallout of the Hindutva hate campaigns is yet to come. When
the Hindu American Foundation denounces a Congressional resolution
against Narendra Modi as
"Hinduphobic", and (Hindutva) groups claiming to represent Hindus spew
venom against Dalits and non-Hindus, the day is not far off when an
innocent child will ask her mother: "Mama, does Hinduism preach killing
of lower caste Hindus and non-Hindus?" Let's make sure such attitudes
do not gain ground.

[Ra Ravishankar is a graduate student at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. ]