Uncovering sand mining’s impacts on the world’s rivers

(WWF) – It is extraordinary how few people know anything about sand mining.

Up to 50 billion tonnes of sand and gravel are mined each year to meet soaring demand from construction and land reclamation – making it the largest extractive industry on the planet. Yet most people have never given it even a passing thought. And nor have most decision makers and river managers.

And they really should because not only is the world’s economy built on sand but unsustainable sand mining also poses a risk to rivers across the globe – and to the people, economies and nature that depend on them.

Concerned by the potential impacts on the wold’s rivers, WWF commissioned a review of the available scientific evidence as well as relevant government reports and media articles. Published during World Water Week 2018, the Impacts of sand mining on ecosystem structure, process and biodiversity in rivers outlines the vast scale of the industry and details some of its significant impacts on rivers.

Global demand for sand and gravel – technically aggregate mining but commonly referred to as sand mining – has increased rapidly over the past two decades, largely driven by growth in the Asia Pacific region, particularly in China but also increasingly in India. Astonishingly, China consumed more sand between 2011–2013 than the US did in the whole of the 20th Century.

Most sand is used for construction (sand makes up 90% of concrete and 80% of asphalt) but substantial quantities are also swallowed up by land reclamation. Intent on continuing to expand its land area, Singapore remains the world’s largest importer.

Sand mining is already putting unprecedented pressure on rivers, floodplains and deltas – and demand is only set to grow as development, urbanisation and gargantuan infrastructure projects, such as the Belt & Road Initiative, consume more and more sand. And the impacts are certainly cause for concern.

Reviewing existing scientific papers, the WWF’s research highlighted numerous physical impacts attributable to sand mining from changes in the shape of river beds and floodplains to alterations to instream habitats, groundwater reserves and water quality. In addition, sand mining can result in a reduction in diversity and abundance of fish in mined areas and changes to riverside vegetation.

Other impacts are hard to directly link to sand mining since rivers are affected by so many different factors, including dams, but it is clear that by sucking too much sediment out of the world’s rivers, unsustainable sand mining will contribute to bank erosion and shrinking, sinking deltas – with the loss of agriculture land, houses and infrastructure, including failure of roads, dikes and bridges.

The problem is that these benefits of the natural sediment flow in rivers are usually ‘hidden’ from decision-makers. Coupled with poor governance and a lack of enforcement of regulations in many countries, this blinkered approach to the impacts of sand mining leave many rivers at the mercy of sand miners.

And over 70 countries, many miners are operating illegally according to widespread reports in local media, extracting dwindling supplies of river and coastal sand, often with the support of complicit governments. Unsurprisingly, violence follows in their wake as well as damage to rivers and ecosystems.

Europe has shown that developed economies can continue to prosper without resorting to river sand. Its supplies now come from crushed quarry rocks, recycled concrete and marine sand. The question now is what can be done to reduce the demand for sand in rapidly developing countries in Asia and Africa. As the review conclude, it will require systemic change:

The demand for sand is increasing and preventing or reducing likely damage to rivers will require the construction industry to be weaned-off river sourced sand and gravel, either through the substitution of materials or alterations to building designs and methods so that extraction is reduced to levels that are proven to be sustainable/have little negative ecological impact.

This type of societal shift is similar to that required to address climate change, and will necessitate changes in the way that sand and rivers are perceived, and cities are designed and constructed.

And the review recommends some next steps:

Increase public awareness of the growing demand and finite supply of sand: Public awareness and acceptance will be required for any long term shift away from the present market system whereby sand underpins all development, yet is the cheapest of commodities;

Conduct research into economic incentives or certification schemes that could drive a reduction in the extraction of sand from rivers;

Conduct more scientific research into sand mining in rivers, including short-term ‘rapid’ assessments and longer term investigations to understand changes over the time-scales at which rivers and ecosystems respond to change. Rivers where sensitive or endangered species reside, and their habitat needs are known would provide good initial targets for research. Evidence of where economically valuable species are being lost would provide information on economic trade-offs.

The severe lack of information regarding rivers in developing countries must rapidly be addressed.

Search The Fifth Column

Get updates on Facebook

Sections

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRejectRead More

Privacy & Cookies Policy

The Fifth Column is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.