Russia has the most material (as in: the largest army). according to Wikipedia Russia have over 20mil. men in reserve versus the American 1.5million, and there's also the Chinese army . Sure, they lack the precision of a drone-guided missile, but they can shoot more rounds than the Americans can.
Most powerful? Possibly, but we simply can't tell since the Chinese rarely attack anyone, and Russia only wakes up in spring time when it's time to remind the peasants not to leave the Mother Russia. You must remember that the Georgian war was over in 5 days.

If it comes to invading any of those countries? It can't be done. Russia is cold, harsh land made to destroy empires, the America has too many people willing to fight back, and the Chinese have.. well.. even more people who can be conscripted.
Not to mention the nukes. No one likes nukes.

Russian tech is brilliant, for en example during the cold war when the Americans got their hands on some Russian Jets they first laughed at all the outdated components used like Radio tubes rather than Transistors, until they realized that in the event of a nuke only Russian planes would be operational as only the electronics in their planes would be sturdy enough to withstand the emp sent out by the nuke.
(sorry about the *********** of a paragraph)

We Honestly would, The state of Virginia Has more people registered and trained to use fire arms, than most countries have of an army, I mean My neighbor has 3 .50 caliber rifles, and two full auto Ak-47's

I personally have a .45 magnum a room over from me

(I'm against the laws that ban Guns if anyone wants to say anything about that)

1: in a suburban area, there is none, I'm not 100% sure but I'd think that those wouldn't be street leagle, besides they aren't designed specifically for killing
2: cutting a large piece of meat, I'm not good in the kitchen I assume there is a situation where its preferable
3: last I checked, Speakers aren't particularly lethal, besides that, increased range to my yourself heard at a large event like a concert or massive party

Well, yes, but the swords don't come out until somebody runs out of bullets. That way you could have explosions and bullets everywhere and some dude running around with a sword saying, "Don't bring a knife to a gunfight? THIS ISN'T A KNIFE!!!"

Because, No one can be trusted on this planet, Everyone has there own personal vendettas, But if you want to see the Most paranoid people in the world, Look at a politician, What happens if the country is over taken, and the government falls, the Military has no command, That causes chaos, then what happens, It is every man for him self, we have to defend it on our own.

The best way to keep a country running, Is to have a fail safe for every situation, And if our final fail safe is a few million civilians with guns, Than you better be damn Sure its a hell of a good fail safe

and either way, military-grade weapons are still way too powerful and dangerous for public ownership, they aren't designed with defense in mind, they're meant to kill as many people in as little time as possible

that may not explicitly be their though but that's the only possible result,
it has more bullets per magazine: thus can fire longer before reloading: thus more time to do damage/kill
it has fully automatic capability: thus it can fire said bullets faster: thus do damage/kill faster

by the same logic one doesn't make a bomb more powerful to cause more destruction, but to improve explosive technology. same end with a better sounding name

If they attempted to ban guns they'd have a full on revolution on their hands. Not to mention many people serving in our military would be against the ban, if not all of them. I fully believe it would tear apart the country or weaken it.