i'm not whining about it because i have some big nest egg at risk. i'm a middle to lower class old woman. i agree that they should be able to
protest and so does domo1. THE PROBLEM IS they are attacking his family, by releasing his private info, now just any nutcase can show up at his house
and get revenge on anything any cop in the history of the freakin' planet, has done. people are not thinking clearly about this. they're blaming
entire races, whether you actually have anything of value, your religion, your gender, your appearance, where you work, your job title, etc. it's
out of control!

So you are "whining" about your overactive imagination.
The cop is the one that needs to do some thinking here. Cops have a different level of power than average citizens. Cops can do things the rest of us
cannot. When a cop wants to get revenge on you, you will wish he was just sending you pizzas.

When I was arrested, that arresting officer was listed in the phonebook. I knew exactly where he lived. So again I have to ask if you get mad at the
phonebook because you never addressed that.

What a mess, I hate when these police officers react before thinking, like they are pumped up on steroids, and have roid rage, It happens all the
time. "Really" mace innocent young women protesters WTF. What's next macing young Children.

that was a cheap shot and not even remotely worthy of you. you are better than that.

everyone in this thread knows things are messed up.

everyone knows, the protestors didn't do anything wrong

and that the police officer did do something wrong.

we are in agreement on everything, except the issue of the guy's info

see that's what they did to that lady i told you about. they posted all her info and then added a bunch of negative crap about her with the info,
trying to generate people willing to harass her,

made commentary so that you were lead to see things in her videos that either weren't there or were there but may not have been what they assumed.

in any case, they darn near ruined that lady's life on the pretext that she was crazy. since when is it a criminal issue to be ill. the brain is a
body organ. it doesn't get ill to spite other people or to make other people angry it gets ill because body parts do that occassionally.

Well I just watched the video and who ever is responsible for that pepper spray attack should at the very least be charged with assault.
What is this cops wife going to think about her husband violently attacking a young woman unprovoked? if she has any dignity and ability to reason
then she will pack the kids up and leave the violent sociopath.

What a grade 'A' T%&d, what kind of sick coward does something like that?
I mean they had the girls penned in, backed into a corner and then they attack like that, even one of the other cops looked disgusted, this so-called
man will be in deep with his own for that stupid stunt.

I kinda like the concept. If I am to be restricted from posting anonymously on the internet, then public serpents should not be allowed to act
anonymously behind the badge...nor judges, bankers or shady doctors. Yes, I'd like all of their information....maybe they'll be nicer if they can't
hide behind an agency, attorney or law!

Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
This move by anonymous has the very real potential to backfire on them, badly. Publishing a cop's home address most likely won't get the cop hurt.
If attacking the cop was what someone was after, they know exactly where he'll be. He's a cop after all He has a very predictable and assigned area
with times to expect him. However, someone who wouldn't have the guts to attack the cop directly might well go for a wife and/or kids.

I hope this doesn't end badly for the family of this Cop. If it does....Anonymous will have crossed a line with me and millions more like me. You
don't put a bulls eye on the FAMILY of the person you want to target for something. That may sound old fashioned to some, and to be totally honest
here, I grew up as the son of a Cop so my view is hardly without bias...but some lines have been respected by even the worst of organized crime. Why
can't Anonymous show some class too? Oh well...

I disagree. This will teach "the cop" and many others like him to think twice before committing an act like the following. Your family is the most
important thing in the world i would think in America? You can be sure he'll never do the wrong ever again.

Anon did a good job. Besides i don't see this backfiring on them as it's just one ass of a cop compared to mastercard etc...

Well since little anon released this information, it makes him an accessory to anything that happens to this Officer and his family.

It probally would have turned out worse if they were a group of men. They should have thought about the consequences of what they were doing. Runing
around screaming like an emotional wreck is a call for attention and they got it. As for the officer leave him alone their job is already hard enough.
How would you like to get involved in everyone elses problems? It wouldn't be that easy would it?

Protesting is bad because it might disrupt someone's walk to work?
All this time I was so wrong. I had no idea how un-American protesting was. God knows we need these hedge fund managers to have a nice day. Wouldn't
want people that make money doing nothing and pay less in taxes and get bailed out when they screw up to not have a nice walk to work. I hope this is
the end of protests in America. People got places to go.

Yes because everyone on wall street is a hedge manager... Seriously, how can you tag everyone that works on wall street as the villain?

There are good there are bad just like in every walk of life. It's the same old story blame an entire group. Don't mind that there are far more
innocent people peons on wall street then there are people calling shots.

Protesting is fantastic, using our rights to effect change is the American way.

Just please stop labeling everyone that might have a little more coin than you as the bad guy. I see this constantly and it is ridiculous.

Often times protestors can become violent when not kept at a distance from their targets. You see it all the time all around the world... That is why
protests are generally corded off or held at proximity for everyone's safety...

Cops are cops they mace protestors they always have. This is nothing new. Protestors are going to have to toughen up if they want to prove anything. A
little mace wouldn't have stopped the civil rights movement...

A beating the lock up the firehoses, stood down with pride heads held high through it all. In the face of death itself they marched on they fought on.
Where is the thick skin now?

These powder puff protests are pretty much ineffective... As unfortunate as that is.

Here are the facts of law, actual law. The police officer is a corporate security guard FOR the city. These protesters have the right to peaceably
assembly and state their grievances, they may NOT, damage private or public property, restrict the movement of others, hinder in any way the free
liberty of other protestors who wish to voice an opinion contrary to their own, and they may not make verbal harassment and physical afrontations
toward anyone in a public area.

That being said, the police officer/security guard is not above the law, the use of force, by any means, is a violence against the public. He must
have probable cause that a crime WAS committed, that there was inherent danger to others and to property, that there was the appearance of malice, and
that impending harm may be done. He may NOT presume/assume ANYTHING that would give him the ability or probable cause to take action. ANY action he
takes must be diplomatic in nature FIRST, HE IS a public servant/public trustee. HIS POWERS ARE subordinate TO the people.

Police Academies used to teach this, now cops go to commercial law school. There is no Constitutional Law taught anywhere UNLESS you specifically ask
for it and it is reserved for those who want to get into a political career and not for Law enforcement as that would undermine the commerce of the
Cities and State.

Documented proof that the Constitution was not for us can be found at Padelford, Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah, [14
Georgia 438, 520]. This was a Court case wherein the Plaintiffs sued the City of Savannah for violating what they believed were their
constitutionally-protected rights. The decision of the Judge says it all: "But indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in Court,
on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a compact but he [the private person] is not a party to it!"
[Emphasis added]

The United States Constitution was converted into a Trust and the legal definition of a Trust is: “A legal obligation with respect to property given
by one person (donor), to another (trustee), to the advantage of a beneficiary (Americans).” The property in this Trust includes all land, your
personal possessions that you believe you own and your physical body. The donor of the Trust is the King of England and the Holy Roman Church. The
Trustees are all federal and state public officials, which means that they truly are Agents of a foreign power: the King and the Vatican.

The reason the Constitution was converted into a Trust is because, as a non-trust business plan, The Constitution completely bound the hands of our
government officials. By their converting it into a Trust, our public officials were then free to make any changes they desired to this government
without their constituents’ knowledge. The rules of a Trust are secret and no trustee can be compelled to divulge those rules; and the rules can be
changed by the trustees without notice to the beneficiary.

The above is from an article written by a retired judge who went into hiding as a result of the information getting out. There is more, and remember,
the PEOPLE/PUBLIC are the "beneficiaries" as a result of the 1933 and 1938 bankruptcies and restructuring of the U.S. and NOT of the 50 union States
of America.

[See: VanKosten v. VanKosten, 154 N.E. 146]. A comment by the Judge deciding this divorce says it all! “The ultimate ownership of all property
is the State: individual so-called ownership is only by virtue of government, [i.e.] laws amounting to mere use must be in accordance with law and
subordinate to the necessities of the state.” [Also See: Senate Document No. 43 of the 73rd Congress, 1st Session] and [Brown v. Welch, U. S.
Superior Court].

So we can see that the "police" are taught to understand that WE are the slaves and the government is the master. What Anon did here is wrong, to
out the cop, yes, pay him a visit WITH the intent to educate and not harm. Arrest him under the Citizens Act.

If everyone were to be responsible and bring down these thugs at the time of the crime THEY commit, then we would not have this problem. Education IS
the only way, violence serves no one.

its funny the same people who lecture me that collateral damage and the deaths of innocents is unavoidable in war then complain what about the cops
personal safety or i hope nothing happens to his family.

i say its war. i say cops kill/injure innocent people all the time. i say cops hide behind a position of power.i say cops routinly hear/see their so
called brothers violate the constitution, break the law, as well as kill and injure people and they do nothing. if questioned they lie to defend the
guilty cop(clearly guilty themselves) even when it turns out the victim was totaly innocent.

i say anon rocks and while i hold no ill will to the cops family,i hold no sympathy for them either. let me use a cop/system argument why...if you
didnt violate peoples rights,kill/injure innocent people and then hide behind a giant veil of power... then people you know those blanks(insert cop
term for civilians) that pay your salary wouldnt try and come up with ways to attack you. same goes for covering up the crime of your fellow cops,
jury nullification for cop killers anyone?

think of it as an eye for an eye... if you mace somebodys son/daughter/wife/dad/brother/sister/etc......

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.