Login

Never before, in human history, have we faced such threats (WWIII, global economic, environmental and societal collapse etc.) but never before have we had access to almost limitless information and analysis (both good and bad) and the ability to communicate as a global family of human beings.

We aren't “consumers”, defined by ideology, race, ethnicity or culture but genetically related human beings and we are presented with a unique opportunity to transform humanity and the planet.

We have the accumulated wisdom and history of multiple civilisations from which to understand:

Who rules?

How did they get their power?

How do we distribute power for the benefit of all human beings and the planet?

Who rules? - The Structural Elite (SE) comprised of banking and industrial dynasties, European royalty, those in charge of the "military industrial – media academic complex" (MIMAC), political and economic predators and the super-rich.

According to wikipedia, the original Google motto was coined, either by Google employee Paul Buchheit at a meeting about corporate values that took place in early 2000 or in 2001 or, according to another account, by Google Engineer Amit Patel in 1999. Buchheit, the creator of Gmail, said he "wanted something that, once you put it in there, would be hard to take out".

Is Google evil? You be the judge. Google, along with many other major internet/communications firms, shares user data with the NSA and other intelligence services. Google presents information according to users' profiles (to heighten the user experience, allegedly). Google is also enmeshed in Bilderberg but worse is to come.

Google Gives New Meaning to “Orwellian” – Becomes Ministry of Truth By Jon Rappoport“…if all records told the same tale — then the lie passed into history and became truth.” (1984, George Orwell)The New Scientist has the stunning story (2/28/15, “Google wants to rank websites based on facts not links,” by Hal Hodson):“THE internet is stuffed with garbage. Anti-vaccination websites make the front page of Google, and fact-free ‘news’ stories spread like wildfire. Google has devised a fix – rank websites according to their truthfulness.”

It is only by exploring all available information and alternative explanations that we can approach the truth of any situation or issue. How else would we know that the official explanation of 9/11 cannot be true? Or that other claimed "terrorist attacks" are actually false flags. The internet is a mine of information obscured by misinformation. But once an "authority" determines what is "true" and what is not, we have truly entered a twilight zone in which we are controlled.

Look for an alternative search engine such as DuckDuckGo and set it as your default search engine if you want to escape the new digital Ministry of Truth.

Eva Golinger is an attorney and writer from New York, author of the best-selling book, “The Chavez Code”, amongst others. Eva practices law and hosts two television shows on RT Spanish. She is also a high-level Consultant on strategic matters relating to law, media and foreign affairs.

This is not a post about paedophilia although there are similarities between grooming young, vulnerable people for sexual abuse and as patsies for "terrorism". There is evidence that the establishment, and particularly intelligence services, are involved in both.

The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) mandate was the "cover" to destroy Libya and was wrung out of the UN by the US, UK and France. As in Iraq, eight years earlier, misinformation and fabricated stories were used to gain popular support for air strikes to destroy vital infrastructure and a country in which Libyans enjoyed not only free health-care and free education, but also free electricity and interest-free loans.

And of course, as many warned at the time, Libya's collapse has escalated violence across the region, creating more "jihadists" to wage war in Syria, Iraq and beyond. It is well understood that conflict creates refugees from which yet more "terrorists" emerge. According to the study by Amanda Ekey, a 1% increase in the refugee population creates a corresponding 18% increase in terrorist attacks. So what was the motivation for the destruction of Libya?

NATO’s War on Libya and Africa By Stephen GowansReview of Maximilian C. Forte’s new book"Rejecting a single factor explanation that NATO intervened to secure access to Libyan oil, Forte presents a multi-factorial account, which invokes elements of the hunt for profits, economic competition with China and Russia, and establishing US hegemony in Africa. Among the gains of the intervention, writes Forte, were..."