No “artist” would actually do that. Artists respect other works. R-type trash.

There’s a metaphor about our modern world in here somewhere.

They “hate” Western civilization but they wanna live here and enjoy the perks.

They won’t do their own thing. Far, far away….

In a similar vein?

The people who chop up antique books need to be burned at the stake, it’s the only way to be sure.

Like no, butchering knowledge in its pure form is not a sculpture, Sandra.

Cultured people hate you now. They want respect but disrespect history and heritage.

Cultures take time to develop and personally, to appreciate. The people who say “everyone is creative” are 10/10 cunts who shouldn’t have been encouraged as children. Trashing good things is expression sure but not art.

Same as those people selling off an antique book page by page.

It feels like the bad restoration people but intentional destruction of the superior culture.

They should be shamed. Brats who grew up with anti-social behaviour praised by bad parents/teachers.

You know those were wall doodlers.

If I flipped you the bird right now, it would certainly be a powerful emotive expression… but it wouldn’t be art.

Note the rounds of 19th century and early 20th century immigration led to debt spikes?

Third Worlders in the First World are just economic parasites. It’s IQ and high time preference.

Spoiled privileged Yang truly promises a Boomer bailout of mortgages via a blisteringly obvious planned rent hike* (since all the poor would suddenly be good for it) and you don’t need extra ‘money’ to end the welfare cliff. It’s a pen stroke away to step the payments down gradually.

“Universal” – you have no choice whether to go into debt. No choice. But rich people will get a bailout, no means testing. Fair? About inequality? No and no.

The distance between the poor guy with $0 and the rich guy with a million will be exactly the same if you give both two grand. Perhaps higher, because increasing monetary supply directly causes one thing.

Prices will rise. Regardless of specific agents e.g. landlords.

So spending power of the poor guy will decrease.

Go ahead, vote for it. I wanna see what happens.

You cannot consider income without expense.

It’s an equation, it has two sides.

If only there were an economic law to explain this concept, of supplying and demanding…

*The average hippy American Boomer seriously considers their house their pension. That is factual.

Map the top chart onto spending power, I dare you.

Tell Yang you’ll have UBI under one condition: rent controls. He won’t do it.

“Illusory truth effect” wasn’t invented by (((academics))).“The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous.”

“The expression was coined by Adolf Hitler, when he dictated his 1925 book Mein Kampf, about the use of a lie so “colossal” that no one would believe that someone “could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously”.

Crediting people in academia is important.

“According to Hitler, the “big lie” was a propaganda technique typically used by Jewish Marxists.”
Patently false, they say.

Where have they done that?

This is why you can show PC people all sorts of factual evidence to the contrary and they’re still thick, it really is like a cult. State ‘education’ cult. How many years do you need? One day historians will show all the PC adverts in our media like we see Soviet stuff now.

[They’re scared to show us most Nazi propaganda because they’ve ripped it off again for the present.]

Actually, a propaganda MOOC about modern PC propaganda would be amazing.

This is why slander’s illegal, by the way. On an individual level, repetition for gossip does damage.

The way to actually get the brainwashed to snap out of it is allow questions, increase dissonance and apply consequences for being deluded.

A prophetic book about the future and about God punishing non-Christians. …For disbelief. Not even Christians doing it. God.

If this is maintained, we have precedent for deporting immigrants already here for having violent religions.

Whatever their actions.

So they believe enough to have an official opinion (treat it as real) as the state (illegal, no separation) but disbelieve it or flout its tenets, making it blasphemy but legally hate speech.

So by insulting Christianity, the leader of whom is their monarch and employer, they’re guilty of hate speech.

And questioning the legitimacy of the Queen, which is treason.

I hope for legal reasons all people processing claims are atheist, or all their decisions have bias and become void. Again, deportations must occur. To correct corruption.

However, not every Christian can move here, there are plenty of closer alternatives he’d have a legal right to.

Apparently, we DO have a right to protect our borders? Interesting.

But is it really your border, politicians? If you were allowed to immigrate without the will of the people, you too can be deported for genocidal invasion. Foreigners are inherently biased on deciding whether to let in foreigners.

They also did this to oppose the claim of Islam being violent… despite evidence. Including murdering the guy claiming this. Which makes them directly responsible for his murder.