Soviet Was A Jew-Run Hellhole From 1917 to 1990

Share this:

Like this:

Related

37 Responses

A SEA OF BLOOD: The Truth About Bolshevik Russia
by Dr. Gregor
First Edition published in 1926

Excerpt:

For a non-initiate it must be entirely incomprehensible how such a mighty Reich [empire, meaning Imperial Russia] seemingly in one night of revolution could be set aflame at all four corners and destroyed — to the joy of 1) democracies, 2) the proletariat and 3) Jewry with the first as observers and the second as tools of the third.

However, in one night it did not happen. The events of March 1917 [Kerensky’s middle-class overthrow of the tsar] and of November 1917 [the Bolshevik putsch against Kerensky’s government] were only the visible result of years of patient, mole-like undermining activities by the Internationale, a work which did not begin in the criminal minds of Marx, Kautsky and Engels, but instead in an earlier alliance of Jewry with the higher grades of world Freemasonry…

There is some information about Rasputin in A SEA OF BLOOD: The Truth About Bolshevik Russia:

After a while the faction run by the young tsarina began to gather steam. Minister Stuermer [another German name!] became successor to Sasonov [the one who later moved to England], the old tsarina [“queen mother] was banned to Kiev in Ukraine, and the faint fragrance of peace began to waft in the air.

And peace would probably have emerged from all this had it not been for 1) malicious agents of the Entente and 2) the disastrous, criminal, literally nation-ruining activities of Gregor Rasputin. This creature was, for the Russian Revolution, what Cagliostro was for the French. Cagliostro had used the infamous necklace story connected to Cardinal Rohan to discredit Queen Marie Antoinette [in a gigantic diamond scam involving her purported order of a huge diamond necklace as well as fake delivery men and forged letters all never really instigated by the .queen], a swindle which lay the groundwork for the revolution against the French monarchy. In the same way did Rasputin’s bizarre, extravagant and criminal deeds ruin the reputation of the tsarina and push
Russia toward the edge of that abyss into which it now has plummeted. [3]

Both the tsar and the tsarina had a constant tendency toward mysticism — without ever understanding how to distinguish true mysticism from false. And so we see going in and out at the imperial court a Father Philippe of France; the swindler and grand master of all Martinist lodges, Dr. Gerard Ericosse, known in occult literature under the pseudonym Papys; and many more miracle-healer, passers-by, adventurers and channelers of dead spirits. And so why should not Rasputin also join the crowd?

He understood from the start how to trick the tsarina by posing as a magnetopath — someone who could heal her hemophiliac son, the heir to the throne, through transmitting the vital forces of the universe into the
boy’s body. Perhaps he did have some “magnetic” powers; but it is certain that more important was his ability at sleight-of-hand and deception — his ability to take over minds and corrupt them. In Rasputin’s soul we saw the devil fighting with his guardian angel, and if the devil at last won out, it was not in the least the result of the truly sick atmosphere at the court in St. Petersburg, which alone was able to turn a sly peasant into a weird demi-god. [4]

Using both hypnotic suggestion and magic tricks, Rasputin succeeded in garnering an incredible power over the court. And it can be said that nothing was impossible in Russia if you had Rasputin on your side. There was no job opening, no business opportunity, and no criminal charge which Rasputin could not deal with for you. But Rasputin’s help was for sale, and thus all Russia came to be for sale. This unspeakable degradation was the real reason why the revolution could succeed among the disgusted Russian people — Rasputin was the plow who prepared the soil of Russia for upheaval.

I know there was a Rothschild/Napoleon connection. Rothschild was supposed to fund Napoleons efforts in exchange for jew benefits.
I dont know the official story and whether or not he received any money from Rothschild.
Some sites say Napoleon was pro-jew, some say he was anti-jew.

Now this is a time when slavery was still in existence in the US. And these were the years leading up to communism/marxism.

I also would like to understand the French Revolution and the Napoleanic Wars. I wonder each time I go to buy a book if it is going to the the actual history or a slanted jew version of the histiory. Let us know what you are able to find T. Hopefully after the Spring I can devote more time to reading.

The jew is easy to understand once you understand how the jews think and what the jews want. The jews want to control the entire world. To do that the jew must control all 193 countries in the world, and the jews must control all states in the states, such as the Worker Union, free mason and the Vatican.

ln order to conquer the world the jews must control all the superpowers there are. France at the time was a superpower. The jews had conquered England a long time before. The jew-whore Cromwell. Just search Cromwell + jews.

Russia is and was the biggest country in the world. Of course the jews wanted Russia.

l myself have backtracked the jews to Napoleon. Everything before that is just a repeat of the jews scam. To conquer the whole world you must have steam, oil and jet fighter carriers. The jet fighter carrier came around in the 60s, and is one of the main reason why the jews gave up Soviet as¨the jews proxy war machine for jew world conquest.

Bolshevik or Menshevik was jew gang war. lt is ALWAYS the most jew scumbags of the jew scumbags that winns the jews gang wars. Zionist-jews or communist-jew is jew gang war.When the Menshevik jews realised that the Bolshevik jew gang was winning, all the Menshevik jews joined the Bolshevik jew gang.

To conquer the world you MUST have an armada of jet fighter carriers. And to have that you must have harbours with esay access to warm water harbours. And only America has that. To the west, to the east and to the south.

Why the communist jew gang joined the zionist jew gang in the 60s was because only America can build and maintaine a jet fighter carrier armada. Bolshevik-Menshevik jew gang war, zionist-communist jew gang war = same jew MO repeated all over again.

l havn’t dwelled into what the jews did in France 200 years ago, but you can be sure that you will find a jew gang war in the midst of it all.

Jew gang war is the key factor to understand any event in the history of man.

There are the people l would want a talk about the jews with: Douglas Reed. William Pierce and Solzhenitsyn. What none of them really understood was the jews stealing Russia. How and why the jews stole Russia.

200 years ago Napoleon tried to take Jerusalem and give to the jews. He failed.

After that he called the jews leaders to him and he told the jews that he wanted all the jews to immigrate to France and he would make Paris the New Jerusalem. How can anyone get more jew-whore than that?

Then the jew-whore Napoleon tried to steal Russia and give to the jews.

lt took the jews another 130 years to conquer Russia in 1917. The jews tried to take over Russia in 1881 and then again in 19o5. The jews made it in 1917.

I have to add that the reason for this is primarily to be able to debate the jewish question with others.

I have debated with some people in the last year or two. I usually have most of the answers but once in a while, I get caught up with a question that I dont have enough info to give a convincing response.

I have gotten a few people to undertand the jew problem and would like to get more. I dont want to do it with bitching and preaching. Just articulate, researched info and they can make their own decisions.

Also, when I went to ‘unamusement park’ site, the owner (half jew?) was talking about how names like Goldberg, Goldstein,etc… have only been considered jew names since Napoleanic times, and not before.

albert d pastore
September 11, 2011 @ 7:04 pm
The first big Jewish usurpation of WASP influence in America was 1890’s…thats when Aloph Ochs bought the NY Times and Pultizer the New York World.

Shortly afterwards, these Jewish owned organs (along with Heart’s NY Herald) began agitating for war against Catholic Spain…a war which finally got kicked off by the false flag attack on the USS Maine.

260 US sailors murdered by Asst. Naval Secretary Teddy Roosevelt.

The war greatly damaged the Catholic Spanish monarchy, which was under seige at home by Communists/Anarchists.

After the fall of Napoleon, the Rothschilds turn their hatred towards the Royal Romanov Family of Russia. The Russian Empire is an up and coming world power, possessing vast territory and resources. Like the young United States of America, Orthodox Christian Russia is also destined for greatness. And also like the USA, it is not under Rothschild’s complete control.

Czar (King) Alexander I has already survived a kidnapping attempt made while he was on his way to a conference in Europe. In 1825, the Czar dies of an unexpected illness, contracted while he was again traveling far away from the safe Capital of St. Petersburg. The death is sudden and mysterious, giving rise to “conspiracy theories.” The world-shaking events that will occur over the next 100 years add much credibility to the poisoning theory. Coming events will clearly confirm that the Romanovs and their Empire have been targeted for death by the forces of the New World Order and its controlled gang of Red fanatics.

This same tsar, Alexander II, who followed up in 1864 by giving the people a whole new trial procedure for its court system — at the time the fairest and most progressive in Europe – underwent seven attempts to assassinate him, until finally, in an eighth attempt perpetrated by Goldmann, Liebermann and Zuckermann — can anyone mistake their race? — carried out successfully the wishes of London. [Great Britain being in the control of the Jewish bankers of the City of London.] The great benefactor of his nation was dynamited on March 1, 1881 — the very day that he was to bestow on his country a new, constitutional form of government.

Alexander II was gone, and Alexander III became tsar. With respect to this monarch who preserved European peace — even though his [hostile] policy towards Germany was profoundly mistaken — we Russians were all convinced that when he died in 1894, twenty years before the outbreak of the disastrous World War, he had succumbed to a normal illness, in this case an acute kidney infection. How great was afterward our amazement when we learned — on the run, in exile and from Jewish sources — that this tsar too had fallen victim to the criminal minds of the Internationale and to the tribe of Judah. The Jew Saltus exults over this fact in his book The Imperial Orgy, published in New York in 1920. In·his foam-mouthed delirium over the successful downfall of the Christian-Aryan world he explains in his book how the Jews, working with the Entente powers [England France, the U.S. and Italy], got rid of the tsars one after the other. He further relates that at the same time as Russian churches were praying for the health of the tsar, he was being cursed in the synagogues in the name of “Him who is here and shall be.”

To the bedside of the sick tsar his personal physician, Zakharin, was summoned. Zakharin — a perfectly good Russian name, and yet a Jew. When he arrived to see the tsar in Livadiya, he had the medicine all ready for him in his vest pocket. The kind of medicine is easy to imagine — a figurative one-way ticket into the next world! After the trusting tsar had swallowed the medication and was rolling in pain on his bed Zakharin bent over-him (according to Saltus, with a diabolical grin on his face). The tsar choked out the words “Who are you?” His answer: “I am a Jew!” [1] And with enormous chutzpah he turned to the empress and the tsar’s ministers and said: “Not to worry, his majesty is only talking in a fever.” Then he bent over the dying man and grinned at him again: “You are breathing your last breath — and we have won!” This does not come from me, the defender of the truth on the run. This comes straight from the Jew Saltus in his book The Imperial Orgy.

I shall not cease from mental fight
Nor shall my sword sleep in my hand
’til we have built Jerusalem
in England’s green and pleasant land.

The bastards managed that long ago. Soon it will be OUR turn to dismantle Cromwell’s zog-infested shitland and rebuild England.

T-Bone – Two fairly minor points that you’re probably aware of, but in case you’re not (“don’t assume everyone knows what you know”),

1 – About 740 AD the Khazars decided to adopt and adapt the ancient myths of the biblical “jews”, subsequently pretending to be racially descended from those earlier tribes.

2 – Debating White People makes sense, but trying to debate anything with a jew is useless. My own experiences mirror those of AH, who said (Mein Kampf) that there were times when, after seemingly endless debate, he eventually thought the jew accepted his arguments, only to find the following day that the same jew had no apparent memory of having been proven wrong.

I don’t know whether it’s a deliberate tactic, or whether they really do forget anything that contradicts their fixed ideas, but I do know it to be a fact. Whatever concessions a jew might make today are either forgotten or “forgotten” by tomorrow. In his own simple mind, the jew can never be wrong.

Barney
I know a little about the khazars. I need to research how they were able to hijack biblical history to suit their needs. That will be a mountain to climb but I plan to work thru the last 2 millenia eventually.
I’m a person that likes details. Ultimately I’ll regurgitate the details into simple, easy to understand explanations.

ELP recorded that song you quoted. I’m sure you already knew that though.

And yes, I know that arguing with jews is useless (as well as taking anything that any jew says/writes, as truth).
You quoted MK. Thats one of my fave passages. I posted it several times over the last year at various blogs.

I even have it saved. In my book (different version) ,its on page 62 or 63. The wording is translated slightly different on my pdf than in my book copy but it basically makes the same point.

Some jews, realizing the implication of the fact that the majority of today’s “jews” are Ashkenazic Turkic-Mongolian Khazars, have tried to use jew-manipulated DNA studies to refute it. There is, however, plenty of evidence that most of the Ashkenazim have no Hebrew blood, although some do, because there were some Hebrews in Khazaria. You can find plenty of information on the subject here:

The tomb of a formerly unknown vizier of Akhenaten was discovered in 1989.(35) The name of this vizier, Aper-el is decidedly Semitic/Hebrew. It is not surprising then, that the repeated and pitiful pleas from Akhenaten’s Canaanite and Philistine vassals at Jerusalem and other cities in Palestine for help against the surging tide of Habiru elicited no assistance from Aper-el, or from Akhenaten’s other minister, Aye, the son of Yuya.

Although the city of Akhetaten was never rebuilt, there is a village on the opposite side of the Nile which has retained the name Mal-lawi (or Mallevi, meaning “city of the Levites”) to this present day!(36) The Levites are identified by Osman as that select group of nobles and close relatives of Akhenaten and Yuya who made up the newly formed priesthood of the Aten and served in the temples of Aten at Thebes and at the new capital city of Akhetaten.(37) (In the Sinai, the Levites were Moses’ primary supporters when trouble broke out.) While Akhenaten was still in power, the majority of Hebrews/Israelites would have remained either at Zarw(38) in the Nile delta, or at Akhmin, and would have continued to worship their own god(s) in their own native tongue. This later caused Akhenaten (Moses) some consternation (Exodus 4:10).(39)

Indian historian Kuttikhat Purushothama Chon believes that Abraham was driven out of India. He states that the Aryans, unable to defeat the Asuras (The mercantile caste that once ruled in the Indus Valley or Harappans) spent so many years fighting covertly against the Asuras, such as destroying their huge system of irrigation lakes, causing destructive flooding, that Abraham and his kindred just gave up and marched to West Asia. (See Remedy the Frauds in Hinduism.) Therefore, besides being driven out of Northern India by floods, the Aryans also forced Indian merchants, artisans, and educated classes to flee to West Asia.

If the legendary Abraham was in fact based on Brahma, which appears to be the case, we should expect to see the influence of Brahmanism on Judaism, such as this:

CHRISTIANITY EXAMINED
by Wayne Macleod

Excerpt:

India at that time was a land of grotesque social injustice. The ruling caste of priest-kings, the Brahmans, had appropriated to themselves most privileges and wealth, made all religious and civil decisions and all codes of law, and monopolized learning. At the base of their society were the Sudras and
outcasts who performed all work and were virtual slaves, whose main purpose in life was to serve the higher castes. The worst punishment that could be inflicted on a Brahman was banishment, whereas if a Sudra so much as listened to a Veda being recited he had molten metal poured into his ears; he could be mutilated for the most minor infringements against Brahmans and whipped to death on any pretext. Not only did the Brahmans terrorize in this world, they also prescribed the most graphic torments in twenty-three hells for anyone expressing independence from their control. Violent revolt against such a priest state was impossible; the method adopted derived from Brahmanic asceticism.

Why is a certain commenter on another site always promoting the Vedas?!

Revilo P. Oliver has this to say about astrology:

…The question arises only from an odd fixation among our contemporaries, who assume that holy men always mean well, despite all the evidence to the contrary. A little common sense will show us that since the Magi, probably before the fall of the Persian Empire and certainly soon thereafter, made astrology a very lucrative part of their holy business…
…
There is some evidence that the [Zoroastrian] religion’s centre of gravity shifted to Babylon at some time after the Persian conquest. In that large and opulent city the Magi would have come into contact with Semitic superstitions,
especially the cult of the god Marduk, and it is only reasonable to assume that they urged or applauded the action of Xerxes when he desecrated the god’s temple and confiscated his huge effigy, reportedly of solid gold. They came into contact (assuming that there was no earlier relation) with the city’s large and wealthy colony of crafty Jews, but we do not know in what ways the Jews tried to exploit them. The Zoroastrian holy men in Babylon also found themselves in the very capital of one of the world’s oldest and most lucrative superstitions, astrology.
…
The premises of Zoroaster’s religion, and indeed of most religions, should exclude astrology, but it is a poor theologian who cannot make his Scriptures say whatever he deems expedient.
…
In antiquity, the fallacies of most of the astrologers’ hocus-pocus were
apparent to good minds long before Carneades and the Academics
systematically demolished the hoax…
…
[W]e should not feel for all consideration of astrology in antiquity the contempt
that we feel for the practice of it today, when it is simply a notorious imposture
on the gullible and superstitious. It is not remarkable that the astrological
racket has become so lucrative today: minds that have been so sabotaged that they can believe in the equality of races can believe in anything…

I don’t see any reason to spend time studying the mythology of the Vedas. What I do think is important is to show that Judaism and its derivatives are not unique or original, but are rooted in Sumerian, Mesopotamian, Indian, Persian, Canaanite, and especially Egyptian mythology, among others, and thereby delegitimize them and break the pernicious hold that they have over our minds.

Here is another site that is very informative:

Forbidden Knowledge: the Bible’s Origins

Excerpt:

I understand that Genesis is _denying, refuting and challenging_ the Mesopotamian myths’ explanation of Who, What, Why, Where, When and How man came to made, what his purpose on earth is, and why he does not possess immortality. I understand that the Hebrews accomplished these denials or challenges by taking motifs and concepts from a variety of contradicting myths and giving them “new twists,” changed the names of the characters, the locations, and sequences of events. It is my understanding that the Hebrews were deliberately CHANGING _or_ RECASTING various motifs and concepts within these myths IN ORDER TO REFUTE, DENY, AND CHALLENGE THEM, hence the “reason why” there are _no_ individuals called Adam, Eve, the Serpent, Yahweh, Noah, Shem, Japheth and Ham appearing in _any_ of the Mesopotamian pre-biblical myths. This understanding explains why there appear to be “echoes” or “parallels” or “similarities” between Genesis and the Mesopotamian concepts and motifs regarding man’s creation. I do _not_ understand that the Hebrews are “copying” the Mesopotamian myths, they are _borrowing and recasting various motifs within them_ in order to _refute and deny them_ regarding why, when, where and how man came to be made, placed in a god’s garden, denied immortality and his destruction sought in a Flood. These “recastings” are accomplished primarily via the employment of “inversions” which, in effect, present a 180 degree counter-argument to the earlier mythic concepts of the Mesopotamians, as was penetratingly noted by the late Joseph Campbell in his four volume series of books exploring the mythologies of the world, ancient and modern, called The Masks of God (1959-1968).

“The man who says to me, ‘Believe as I do, or God will damn you,’ will presently say, ‘Believe as I do, or I shall assassinate you.'”
[Voltaire, “Selected Works”]

“You will notice that in all disputes between Christians since the birth of the Church, Rome has always favored the doctrine which most completely subjugated the human mind and annihilated reason.”
[Voltaire]

The more I debated with them the more familiar I became with their argumentative tactics. At the outset they counted upon the stupidity of their opponents, but when they got so entangled that they could not find a way out they played the trick of acting as innocent simpletons. Should they fail, in spite of their tricks of logic, they acted as if they could not understand the counter arguments and bolted away to another field of discussion. They would lay down truisms and platitudes; and, if you accepted these, then they were applied to other problems and matters of an essentially different nature from the original theme. If you faced them with this point they would escape again, and you could not bring them to make any precise statement.

Whenever one tried to get a firm grip on any of these apostles one’s hand grasped only jelly and slime which slipped through the fingers and combined again into a solid mass a moment afterwards. If your adversary felt forced to give in to your argument, on account of the observers present, and if you then thought that at last you had gained ground, a surprise was in store for you on the following day. The Jew would be utterly oblivious to what had happened the day before, and he would start once again by repeating his former absurdities, as if nothing had happened. Should you become indignant and remind him of yesterday’s defeat, he pretended astonishment and could not remember anything, except that on the previous day he had proved that his statements were correct. Sometimes I was dumbfounded. I do not know what amazed me the more – the abundance of their verbiage or the artful way in which they dressed up their falsehoods.

This, below (my book copy) is what I typed, word for word at firstlighforum. He liked it and posted it in an article. It was about a year or so ago.

Compare the translations if you like.

“The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn’t help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about.

“Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured thru your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn’t help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn’t remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.” —Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

Thanks T-Bone. That’s exactly the part I meant, and it’s as true today as it ever was.

I still haven’t read MK all the way through, but when I first started reading it, I was amazed at just how jew-aware AH was back in those pre-internet days when just about all information was already filtered by the infernal jew.

The trouble is that there’s just too much information available to us today, but at least that means we’ve got no excuse any more, and it’s surprising just how many “ordinary” people know what’s going on.

I’ve read part of Mein Kampf, part of Controversy of Zion, part of The curse of Canaan, part of this, part of that. There just never seems to be enough time to read anything all the way through before there’s something else that needs to be read “now”.

I’m not complaining. The more information we can get, the better, and at least we won’t run out of reading matter when the internet goes down, plus we’ll be able to write truthful history books when the kikenvermin are no more.

If and when a revolution comes, it will probably be everyone against Whites.
Just as the jews led the bolshevik revolution, hints of a similar situation are currently happening now (i.e. anti-White propaganda, multi-cultural empowerment,etc…).

Too many similarities.

Niggers and spics walk around with their heads held high these days as many Whites have their tails between their legs.
If Whites are to win, it will be out of defense,not offense.

The media elite are all jews. The ‘working man’ are all Whites. The benefactors of illegal taxation are all minorities.

So there is the elite ‘jew’ in media and politics and there is everyone else at the bottom; minorities doing the jew bidding in an imminent revolution.

If things go the jew’s way, they will bail out, stay at the top and pin the blame on the victor at the bottom; hence herding them into another wall.

When one understands what communism is, how can they not see that it is a jewish concept that is under way as I type this?