A moo posted pics of her tard and someone lifted to use elsewhere in the fight for abortion rights showing what you can end up with if abortion is made illegal. The public turned on the "photo lifter" but also on the moo for putting it out there and wondering why this happened. One of the commenters. of course called aborting tards eugenics because in this horribly overpopulated world we need endless people needing 24 hour care just because.

This bint deserves everything she gets. Not only does her kid have Rhett Syndrome, which in itself has significant physical and cognitive disabilities, including a propensity for them to drown themselves due to their obsession with water, the kid has severe facial deformities that would no doubt, severey impact on it's quality of life.For those who don't want to see it, the kid not only has Rhett Syndrome, but severe facial deformities, that without exaggeration, looks like the jagged-toothed, evil clown from the movie IT. As i've worked with tards in my past, I would hazard to say that the facial deformities would be a result of another syndrome, and they never occur with a single dysfunctional characteristic, but rather a cluster of screwed-up issues, which has a higher percentage of having related syndromes such as Rhett Syndrome. Essentially the kid is majorly defected, and I would go further to say that the facial deformities is the least of this poor kid's issues.

This undoubtedly would've shown up in-utero screening, and she chose to keep it, knowing full well the kid was massively defected. Anyone with half a brain would know that this defect would need a lifetime of support, and no doubt have a very shit quality of life, which would be radically shortened due to its defects. She selfishly chose her own desires to sluice over the defect she sluiced.

2. She attention-whores her defect on social media, and then got all pissy that the stuff she put in a public forum got used for something that goes against her twisted beliefs. This is akin to uploading a sex tape on the well known and very public interwebs, and then get pissy that a porn site is charging people to see it. This is going to sound awful, but I'm glad the pro-choice picked it up and publicly shamed this bint, because it shows how deluded pro-choicers thinking is that every fetus is perfect, and never should be aborted, and the reality of why abortion is needed at times.

This pic looks worse. Moo is asking the social media world for a pro bono lawyer and is calling the photo lifting a "hate crime" Pro-liars would love to go after abortion base on the idea of a hate crime, no matter what the condition of the fetus is. I know it is not the sprogs fault but God that poor kid looks creepy

Not only creepy Cfdave, but downright vacant - as in lights are on, but nobody's home. I could be wrong, but the kid looks like she's a vegetable. As for the photo lifting supposed 'hate crime', Geez, over-reacting much?!? This triggered rage is actually quite common among momma-bears of defecto-loafs, as anything that touches on their broken oven, or the fact that their kid is defected, makes them go into unbridled rage and virtue signalling. It's basically them projecting all their frustrations and suppressed anger of having to look after a defecto-tard.

However, there's something more to it, and basically the original tweet that triggered this bint, was essentially saying that if moos find out pre-natal tests showing their brat is severely disabled and will be fucked for life, and choose to go through with it, that they need to pay for the defect's future medical bills. Yep, nothing triggers these bints than accepting accountability for their actions.

The guy also basically said that this defecto-tard's severe disabilities, is the whole reason why abortions should be easily accessible. It's obvious this guy cares more for her tard for what she does, as nobody with an ounce of humanity or intelligence would not immediately know when this showed up in the bint's pregnancy screening, that this kid's would no doubt have radically shortened, shit quality of life full of suffering.

A moo posted pics of her tard and someone lifted to use elsewhere in the fight for abortion rights showing what you can end up with if abortion is made illegal. The public turned on the "photo lifter" but also on the moo for putting it out there and wondering why this happened. One of the commenters. of course called aborting tards eugenics because in this horribly overpopulated world we need endless people needing 24 hour care just because.

The way the economy in the United States is circling the toilet Tards, even with caregivers, are turds going flush fast. I am not a Tard hater, in fact by some standards I AM a Tard. I am an Aspie on SSD.

Moo is very passive-aggressive. She can post photos of her daughter but she can't deal with reposts. Anyone who posts a photo has to accept that their photo could be reused by others in a way they don't approve of. Or better yet, stay off of social media moo.

If there was a photo with a healthy girl who may be considered ugly would the reaction have been the same? Or what about a healthy average looking child who someone decides to use to promote abortion?

What really makes me sick about this is moo is out there crying with her righteous indignation that anyone dare use the photo of her daughter to have Twitter account suspended. What about the little girl who has to live with the pain of her condition and if she is cognizant enough may be fully aware of the staring she has to endure any time she is out in public? If she is able to go to school comments will be made by kids and most likely bullying will happen even if it isn't on the school grounds. She can't possibly have a future, regardless. She just exists.

I did notice that lots of people were commenting on people behind keyboards that are commenting on the little girl's appearance and talking about what jerks they are. The little girl gets to endure this pretty much anytime she is in public and often it is going to come from "precious children". And "precious children" are mean and bully regardless.

The way the economy in the United States is circling the toilet Tards, even with caregivers, are turds going flush fast. I am not a Tard hater, in fact by some standards I AM a Tard. I am an Aspie on SSD.

No one who writes as cogently and succinctly as you do could ever be mistaken for a tard.

First off, Rett Syndrome is not necessarily detected in utero. We have a family that comes into my restaurant job whose daughter has it, and they didn't know anything was wrong until she was around 6 or 7 months old. Without knowing these people, there's no way to determine if she had prenatal testing and chose it. The mother looks fairly young, so if she was pregnant when she was under 30, she may not have even bothered with testing.

I'm rabidly pro abortion. I used to work in the pro choice movement as my job. That being said, there are an infinite number of ways to promote that stance without putting pictures of a severely disabled child on social media. Do I think parents in general should not post pictures of minors on social media? Yes. (See Ahern, Shauna). But retweeting a picture of a deformed child to bolster your views is absolutely terrible.

This is why I don't share a whole lot of pics of myself on any social media. If, in some alternative universe I would have birthed a tard, I would NEVER put up the photo. I find both parties at fault here. The moo who posted her kid's pic without an ounce of concern for the kid's privacy, and the people who used the tard's photo to further their case for abortion. This type of behavior can easily backlash on the entire message.

I don't share things on the net unless I'm prepared to lose it, have it used against me, or have it criticized. I also am very careful not to put any photos of the inside of my home, because I don't want anyone to think I have money and break in.

Common sense would tell these idiot moos that there are a lot of people out there who are more than happy to steal and reuse a photo for their own agendas, but nowadays, common sense ain't so common anymore.

I just want to add that I am vehemently pro choice, and have had an abortion. I can't understand why anyone would choose to birth a child who will suffer with a painful, short life, but then again, I don't understand breeders. If the moo had no clue that her fetus was a defecto, I can't hold her at fault. The whole situation is sad, and stupidity is the star of the show.

Whoops, my post may have not been too clear in pre-natal testing. Rhett syndrome can't be detected in utero, however severe facial deformities like this, would have been picked up with standard ultrasound. Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't regular trimester ultrasounds, pretty much standard and routine practice? Granted, people can forgo these, but it's not recommended, and this situation is the very reason why routine ultrasounds are done. If this bint did refuse them, then she's an ignorant and negligent moron, who deserves having to look after a tard.

That being said, Rhett syndrome does have physiological markers, such as small hands and feet, along with sharp facial features. Granted that Rhett syndrome is usually not picked up until later, but if there are any peculiar questions showing up in ultrasounds, any pediatrician worth their salt, would order more comprehensive scans. If that's the case, the scans would show up that there are severe facial deformities and possible other deformities with the fetus, as well as lower than average size hands and feet.

I'm quite confident that this bint knew that her bun in the oven was defected and would no doubt have a shit quality of life due to it, but chose to go through with it. Even if the deformities were only on her face, something this severe would still show up on basic ultrasounds (heck particulate matter can be seen in ultrasounds, something as severe as this kid's mouth would be a big flashing 'deformity' sign).

In regards to the person picking up the picture to further their agenda is quite poor, but remember the bint put it out on a public forum, and then complained when someone used it for something that goes against her personal views. It's exactly similar to mumofsixbirds mentioned, common sense tells you that putting anything out there publicly, can and will make one lose all control of it's use. Like I said, it's akin to someone uploading their sex tape, and then complaining that some porn company is selling it, as they are against pornography.

What really gets me is people who have other kids and choose to raise severely impaired children anyway. You know they're trashing all their other kids' childhoods by centering their family around this child.

Ugh. I feel so sorry for that poor kid, not only for having to exist in that state but for having a mom who posts pics of her all over the web for people to do as they please. Every day I'm glad social media wasn't around when I was a tot because parents always overshare things that their toadler-age kids can't consent to.

*looks at pic* *shudders* If I had a clue something like that was in my uterus, I would have aborted immediately. That shit was scary! Poor child, to have to go through life like that. What quality of life will she have? NONE. Even if she has surgery, it won't help much. ewwwww *shudders again*

I know a few couples in a social group I recently left who were close friends because their kids have Rhett’s Syndrome (they called them the “silent angels” for some stupid reason) and hold a fund raiser every year to cover the cost of their genetic horrors. Three people didn’t just make a crap shoot at the genetic lottery and end up with one defect, most of the breeders with “silent angel” defecto tards had their first spawn born with the defect and continued popping out similar spawn with the same defect and then crying about how hard and expensive it is to raise their mistakes. I burned a few bridges when a now former friend tried to guilt me into helping with the fundraiser for the defective spawn and their breeders and told them how irresponsible it was to not only keep reproducing after popping out one kid with this disease but to continue to pop out more and expect everyone else to pitch in to pay for their mistakes and that breeder pleasing douchebag went and told everyone how “hateful” I am because I refused to anticipate in their money grab or kiss the ignorant breeders asses.

that's exactly what I was saying on another thread regarding my SIL 's friends who had 4 kids w/ some rare disease that kept them at home, in a wheelchair and oxygen and probably in pain. After the first one there was a fundraiser, but then they kept having 'em. I had to keep on the down low because I didnt want ILs guilting us to go, besides we really didn't know them. But you have one kid that takes all your time and money and the state money, and your friends pitch in and then you have more?????????? Crazy. Plus after all that, they gotta a divorce. I'm trying to see how a divorce would better your life in that situation because you still have the burden that is dragging your life down, the upkeep of the sick kids. A divorce is no solution to anything. You were given a tough life, but you kept making it tougher. The solution to your shitty life would be to stop having the kids after you realized this was happening. I know people probably thought I was a jerk, but I wasn't going to donate to more fundraisers if you keep digging yourself a bigger hole.

I think my SIL is about to end up in this same situation. She has a child; he’s a cute kid but was born with a rare birth defect and a number of other physical problems. She’s had several miscarriages on her way to getting pregnant with #2. Her current pregnancy has made it far enough along that it looks like it will stick. I’m just waiting to see what kind of problems #2 comes out with.

Adoption was suggested when it looked like there would be no second pregnancy. It was dismissed as too expensive. I would love to ask such questions as “Do you think your body might have been telling you something with all the miscarriages?” And “If you can’t afford the adoption, how can you afford to raise the kid?” But we all know that there is no room for logic when it comes to breeding, so I must keep my questions to myself lest I destroy my relationship with my in-laws.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________"Not every ejaculation deserves a name" - George Carlin

Quotekittehpeoples
Anybody who has a child when they know there's a likelihood that the kid will be born with a debilitating deformity or in constant pain should be charged with child abuse.

Well, that is 100% of children ever born, as there is always a probability. I think breeders should be more aware of that, but somehow they always think luck will be on their side.

But I expect you mean where there is a high probability, like over 50%. Then breeders would just avoid doctors and say "We didn't knooooowww." Honestly, it's like jailing pregnant drug addicts in an attempt to reduce harm to the fetus - all it does is make the drug addicts skip neonatal care so they can't be held responsible. Serial breeders with hereditary conditions are just breeding addicts who will do anything for their fix.