Mon May 01 2000 14:36:
At collab.net now. The plane flight up was outstanding; we flew along
the coast all the way up.
Whee!

Mon May 01 2000 20:34It Failed Miserably!:
Hey, this is Leonard. My real site (crummy.com or crummy.segfault.org) is down right now due to circumstances beyond my control, so I thought I'd step over to the world of editthispage to see how the other half (that which does not write its own webpage management software) lives.
I've been thinking of making my news management system interoperable
with all the nifty syndication features and whatnot of Manila, so now's as good a time as any to get my test site up and running.

This is a news item. Apparantly this feature just came on the scene yesterday; until then, all entries on the front page for a day were stuck together in a big blob of HTML. I'm incredibly disillusioned about this. I thought the whole point of this software was to organize one's Web writing. The format of scripting.com and editthispage sites
has been a big influence on my own website management software, and
now I discover that said format was much less structured than I believed it to be.

That said, now that the feature's here on editthispage, I suggest
that everyone use it because it really is much nicer to have each
distinct thing you write as a separate entry than to mantain a whole HTML page. It makes it a lot easier to quickly add an entry, for one (although there's the annoying process of having to approve a story before it's posted, which is fine for a site like Segfault but which doesn't make much sense in a context where one person is doing all the entries).

Until late 1998, all the news sections for my sites were done by the
add-to-HTML-page method. On September 11 of that year, I flipped the switch, started using Notebook Of Web-Basedness (now NewsBruiser), that "nitro-burning remote publishing mobile", and never looked back. I initially thought I'd still be adding entries the old way as well, but I never did. It really is a better way, folks.

(Perhaps I am missing something because my impression is that editthispage has a very sophisticated syndication system, and it doesn't make sense to syndicate entire days of material; it makes sense to syndicate individual entries. Right? So maybe there's something else that does entries?)

Is anyone else plagued with broken pipe errors?

Wed May 03 2000 08:50It's another tequila news item:
Must every entry have a URL? Why can't a woman be more like a man?

Good, I got rid of the URL. Now, to get the time on here like
I'm used to.

Wed May 03 2000 09:12Smile!:
My digital camera has (finally!) been shipped. Stand by for an avalanche of photos. I love taking photos and I love being in photos taken by others.

Wed May 03 2000 10:56Let each urchin whet his spine for we breach the thermocline:
And at dawn we make our conquest of the land. Gotta get a Scantron for the marine biology midterm tomorrow. Also
a reminder to myself that I have to lead the discussion on the 23rd.

Wed May 03 2000 17:40It's what you've got!:
I'm obsessed with the Devo album Freedom of Choice. I'm listening to it over and over again.

I attempted
to explain Devo to Josh, but was unable to. I ended up saying "They're
the 80s, only more so.", which is technically correct
but doesn't really explain anything about Devo per se.
Help me out.

Some of Devo's lyrics make me wince (eg. the part about the dog in
the title song), but on the whole they're excellent. And Devo rocks.
Even if they had nothing interesting to say, Devo would rock.

Mike wants me to write a CGI that lets one submit captions for pictures a la MST3K's Caption This!. I may do it over the weekend. I tell you, this guy is bleeding me dry.

Also: I forgot what I was going to put here. Oh yeah. Not only is Mark a NewsBruiser beta
tester, but he's also using COPOUT. In fact, he's ripping off one of my old polls. How's that for gratitude? Mark, I will hunt you down and steal your RealHamster doll!

Thu May 04 2000 05:32Hi, I'm Terry Chow:
I just found Terry Chow's homepage, and, as a consequence, this picture of him doing "The Terry Chow Look" which I've never seen anyone else do. It's his look of pride or surprise. It says "Hi, I'm Terry Chow.". It's fabulous. He looks a lot different in person, though, for some reason.

If you click on the picture you will get a larger version in which you can see that Terry is a KDE user, like me.

Thu May 04 2000 13:12I directly apprehend that this sucks!:
Done with my philosophy paper, an hour before it's due. As usual, I
hate it. As usual, it will probably get a B. I'm so glad I'm not a philosophy major like Dan is. I couldn't stand that.

Thu May 04 2000 18:09Photo, photo, photo mania:
My camera finally came in, and in accordance with prophecy I am madly taking photos of everything. The fruits of my labors, including a tour of the Leonard/Dan apartment and a picture of my fabulous Elvis votive, are avaliable in pictures

Fri May 05 2000 06:03%left BLEAH:
My parser works, kinda. I can't get the operator precedence declarators
to do anything, though, so I've got 26 shift-reduce conflicts. I know it's ignoring the precedence declarators because I can, eg., make + nonassociative and it'll still parse 1+1+1. Nonetheless, it parses all the example programs,
although it's still probably
got bugs (I thought my lexer was perfect, but the writing of the parser
uncovered four new bugs in it). It's due at noon.

Fri May 05 2000 07:49When copywriters make technical decisions:
My camera's three settings of picture quality: "Best", "Better",
and "Good". Stop it! For one thing, I don't need to be reassured that
even though I'm taking pictures on the lowest quality setting, the
quality is still acceptable. For another, "Better" is not an identifier.
"Better" is a function. Knock it off, marketing people!

In other news, I now have only 4 shift-reduce conflicts.

Fri May 05 2000 08:28Uh-oh...:
Not good. The SEAS network is inaccessible from outside. My parser is due at 12. This
basically means I'm turning it in as-is. But how? I can go on-campus
now and do it and then waste a whole lot of time until my class at 2.
I can wait til 11 and then go and fight for a place in the lab. I
suppose I'd better go now. This class is very strict about deadlines
and I don't think "The SEAS network
was down" will be accepted as an excuse.

Fri May 05 2000 09:36I hate thinking up titles for everything:
I'm in the lab now. I finally figured out how to do {chicken, precedence} right, so I am rid of all the conflicts. I've submitted my project now. I don't know if it works 100%, but it should at least pass all the tests.
This is all I need, since I won't be using my own syntax to do the rest of the projects. At noon, we'll get a standard syntax which we are all to use so that it will be easier to grade the other projects.

I like the way our projects are graded in this class. The TA writes a bunch of test programs (which we don't get to see) and then tries to clobber our lexer/parser/compiler/bytecode generator with them. Your grade is based on how well your program avoids clobberation. It's very objective, in contrast to the lower-division classes in which you had to turn in your source code in a manilla folder and the TA would go through it and dock you points if you didn't have enough comments (I once got docked for having too many comments!).

Fri May 05 2000 10:55Sissy email worms must go!:
Enough with these sissy email worms! I'll tell you how to write
an email worm, dammit. Don't just look in the victim's address book.
Look in their mail archive. Use the mail archive to a) find more
emails to send the worm to, and b) create a plausible subject line
for each address. If you can't find a plausible subject line (if there's
no recent thread for that address), generate one at random. Use a
CFG that can do a couple million different subject lines of twenty different major types.

Don't make
someone run an application to do all this for you; hijack Outlook
and do it yourself. Melissa had the right idea.

Scan for interesting
keywords and send messages that match to a randomly selected set of 1-3 email addresses (out of of 10,000)
100 of those email addresses are controlled by you, throwaway accounts and whatnot. The
other 9900 belong to random people. You now get lots of juicy
email and implicate lots of innocent bystanders.

Encrypt all these lists of email addresses, fragments of subject
lines, etc. Use real encryption and not pansy XOR encryption so that
it will take a couple days instead of a couple minutes to get your plaintext.

Is this so difficult? I can figure out how to do a good email
worm and I'm not even particularily evil. What's up with these evil people
who foist lame email worms upon the Windows world?

Sat May 06 2000 07:36I'm not only the server... I'm also a client!:
I'm very excited, because... well, I shouldn't say until it actually
goes through. Suffice to say that I am excited. I'm struggling to keep quiet because there are many associated stories that I want to tell and I'm afraid I'll forgot them.

To change the subject: as great as editthispage is, I miss NewsBruiser. It takes less
time and fewer actions to publish an item with NewsBruiser than with
editthispage. The disparity is multiplied when I'm using lynx, as I
usually am. Editing an entry is easier with editthispage (I should
certainly hope so!), unless you want to edit an old entry, in which
case it's a toss-up.

I dis not editthispage. It is good, especially if you don't
have an account on a server.

I'm working on the caption script for Mike. Not as fun as I thought
it would be. Oh well. I have to study for my compiler midterm as well.
Celeste is coming over this afternoon to help me study for 130.

Sat May 06 2000 08:03The Loan Arranger strikes again:
I got a packet of stuff from Sallie Mae (a loan company, not a southern belle) about the loan I got
from them in 1998. I have to start paying the loan back on the
first of next year. I can conveniently make my monthly payments
electronically, or I can go for a longer-term payment schedule,
and I'll get 2% off the interest rate if I make my first 48 months
of payments on time and blah and blah. The funny thing is that
all of this is completely irrelevant since by next year I'll be
able to pay the loan in one lump sum. It's only a $1500 loan.

Sat May 06 2000 08:50make woooorld!:
I just realized something. In addition to "make" and "make install", the makefile
generated by autoconf should have "make rpm" and "make deb".
"I mantain packages for program x" should not be something worthy of being put
on your list of contributions to free software. "What's to mantain?" That should be what people ask Dan. But it ain't.

I don't know an incredible amount about package creation, but
it seems that if you can automate "make install", you can automate
"make rpm". I want to say that this would be revolutionary, except
it wouldn't. But it would be damn nice. Any piece of software that uses autoconf:
you can build into an RPM, build it into a DEB,
package it as a source RPM. No more waiting for RPMs to come out.
No more programmer-hours wasted in mantaining packaged versions of software.

Remember the Programmer's Creed: Any sufficiently boring task
can and should be automated. Package management is boring. Let's automate it.

Sun May 07 2000 21:01Jezebel, Malkuth, Smoke Gets in Your Eyes!:
That's me, sick as a dog. I communicate with Dan via email, even
though he's just across the room, because it hurts too much to talk.
Bleah. And I have a midterm tomorrow. I sincerely hope I will only
be asked about regular expressions, DFAs, and emperical questions
like "write a yacc grammar for language x". The portion of the
exam in which I will be asked to trace the actions of ye Parser
will be failed miserably by me.

I can't concentrate on my compiler book but I can work on
Foucault's Pendulum. I'm over halfway done. It's good that
I read it immediately after reading Mackay's Extraordinary Popular
Delusions, as I now recognize many of the historical personages
(Cagliostro, Dr. Dee, &c.). In general, I'm understanding much more
of what's going on (eg. I caught the Name of the Rose reference(s? are there more than one?))
than I did when I read it a year ago. A few things still puzzle me,
though.

It's a shame that there's no bibliography for Foucault's Pendulum.
I know that works of fiction don't generally have bibliographies.
But Foucault's Pendulum definitely deserves one.

Oh, minor question. I reread Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective
Agency, and I finally understand everything in the book, except
for one little detail: how did what they did actually save the human
race? I don't see how the effects of Dirk's actions at the end prevented
what originally happened from happening again. I know what
happened, but I don't completely understand how it helped. I can't go
into too much detail because I don't want to give the ending away.

Mon May 08 2000 08:57I am in fact a stunt goldfish:
Mike and I figured out why the stuff at the end of Dirk Gently
was what needed to happen, so there's no need to write in.

Tue May 09 2000 07:07When midterms attack!:
The CS132 midterm met my father in an arbitrary number of nested
steel cages. I think some of my early calculus midterms may have
been worse than that midterm, but apart from that... Oh, the pain.
There was one question on regular expressions/DFAs and all the
rest were on recreating the jovial antics of the parser.

On the bright side, I'm feeling a lot better. Disease-wise, I
mean. Also, the midterm was only 25% of the grade, and the final
is noncumulative, so if I start going to class I'll do okay.

There was something I wanted to put here, but I forgot.
I'll put it in here when I remember what it was.

Tue May 09 2000 13:01And who's this Crick fellow?:
James D. Watson is coming on campus today to talk about his
new book. I was staring at the promotional flyer thinking "Hmm,
that name sounds familiar." Duh.

Tue May 09 2000 21:12So close, and yet...:
The machine that hosts segfault and crummy, project.linux.com, has been moved.
Unfortunately, getting segfault back on the air requires the cooperation
of two of the most sluggish forces on earth: Network Solutions and
Scott James Remnant. I have to contact Scott (I'm probably going to
have to call him) and then he has to change the IP and DNS info
for segfault.

Crummy also requires the cooperation of two of the most sluggish
forces on earth: Network Solutions and me. Fortunately, I'm on the
ball and have already sent my form in to NSI so that they can tell
me they can't accept it.

Network Solutions: Because someone's got to employ all those
ex-Soviet bureaucrat refugees.

Tue May 09 2000 21:42Automation frees the workers!:
Hm, looks like all the bureaucrats have been put out of a job. I
actually changed my nameserver information correctly. Of course,
it'll be a while til it {heals,propagates}.

It's been great to live on editthispage for a while, but it will
be better to live on NewsBruiser. Whee!

Thu May 11 2000 10:10What law says we can't?:
Finished my rereading of Catch-22 yesterday. I've never seen a book be going so well and then go downhill so suddenly. That book plays out Joseph Heller's writing career in miniature. In high school I read Catch-22 and was captivated. Then I read We Bombed in New Haven and Closing Time and they sucked.
He's written other stuff and, although I can't say for certain, I'm fairly sure that all his other stuff sucks as well. Except for the screenplay for Casino Royale, which he isn't credited for so I doubt he did a whole lot of work on it.

Thu May 11 2000 10:27Now it can be told!:
OK, here's the big thing. I've accepted a position at collab.net, the O'Reilly software spinoff that's a funky sex machine for all the chicks.[0] My boss is Apache lead developer Brian Behlendorf. I'll be working on the tigris.org set of tools for distributed software development. Everything I write will be released as free software.

I stand to do a lot of good work and make a lot of money. I'm very happy about this. The downside is that, not only will I still be in California[1], I'll be in San Francisco. Bleah! Even this has an upside in that I'll be able to hang out with cool folk like Mike Popovic and all my rowdy friends who also come up to the Bay Area after they graduate.

[0] I heard innuendo that in the new Shaft movie, there is no
"Shut yo' mouth!" in the theme song, with the predictable result. What's up with that? Shaft is about the 70s and "Shut yo' mouth!", and the new movie has neither. Not the way to do a Shaft remake, my man.

[1] I love California. It's great. But I've lived in California all my life and I'd like to try living somewhere else for a while.

Fri May 12 2000 05:12:
Okay, this is super weird. Please send me email (leonardr@ucla.edu)
if you can see this.

An explanation of the horrible things that have been going on
will be forthcoming. To catch up on what's been going on in the
absence of crummy.com, check out Crummy:
The Backup Site. All further updates will take place here.

Sat May 13 2000 15:28:
This might go into Leonardonics eventually, but it's a little too
new to do it right away: Josh and I came up with a new acronym: AEM,
Ass Extraction Method. It's how you come up with bogus constants
like the constants for the COCOMO equation: "We'll obtain that
data through AEM." Why simply "pull something out of [your] ass" when you can
"utilize AEM"? A message from the AEM Council.

Sat May 13 2000 16:39:
Yesterday, the guys in the CSUA lounge were drooling over photos of the
booth babes at E3. I'm ambivalent about the whole booth babe thing.
Well, "ambivalent" is not the right word. I feel uncomfortable about it in
two different ways. First is the standard way. Second is the way in which
they remind me of the refrigerator booth babes of the 1950s and 1960s.
"Miss Betty Firnesse and the new Westinghouse!" and all that.
Refrigerators, cars, computer games: what happened here?

Sat May 13 2000 21:01:
Remember Mavis Beacon Teaches Typing? The lady on the box (presumably Mavis Beacon) was a very
dark black lady. I'm looking at an ad for the latest version and the
lady on the box has much lighter skin and looks more Hispanic.
Mavis Beacon is obviously a shapeshifter, or maybe a fictional character of some kind.

One of the non-bands I fronted in high school was called "Jerry Mavis and
His Amazing Trained Seals". My stage name was a mix of Jerry Mathers and
Mavis Beacon.

Mon May 15 2000 20:10:
Celeste brought up the subject of flower-eating today. She says
she {read it in a magazee-ee-ee-eene, saw it on an "extreme cooking"
show}. I don't think that an "extreme cooking" show is the proper
venue for discussing the consumption of flowers. I'm picturing some
big burly guy with tatoos and a Karl Marx-style beard jumping into
the camera's field of view, slamming two ham-sized fists together,
and growling "AND NOW WE'RE GOING TO EAT SOME FLOWERS! THE
FIRST FLOWER WE'LL BE EATING IS THE GERANIUM!" It doesn't
work that way. It doesn't work, period.

Tue May 16 2000 07:25:
I'm going to have to write all the abstract syntax tree code and
symbol table code and symbol table stack (actually a linked list) code before I
even get started on the semantic checking. You're supposed to use
the sample code, but the sample code is poorly designed, and the
TA says:

If you feel there is an error
or inadequacy in skeleton, it is not a problem of skeleton itself,
it is your challenge! Fix it or elaborate it.

Fortunately, only one other person has started on the project
(as of yesterday's meeting, anyway), so it's not like everyone is
further along than I am already.

I'll be {crushing your house, designing the AST and symbol table}
today and hopefully implementing it tonight and tomorrow.

Tue May 16 2000 10:48:
My first short story since 1996's critically inflamed Grunion Time
is complete and ready for reading. Behold the best-seller of the
future, Jake Berendes
West Covina! There's an accompanying song (the song inspired the
story, not the other way around) which I hope to record soon.

The story looks a lot better in lynx, except for the fact that
you can't see the graphic. I wonder what can be done about that (making
it look better in non-lynx browsers).

Thu May 18 2000 10:07:
Seriously, what did I do to bring on this terrible neck and back
pain? I didn't sleep upside down or suck my own toes or anything.

Fri May 19 2000 07:30:
I've decided that it's not a good idea to brag about how incredibly
long your Linux system has been up. You're just announcing to the
world, "Hey, look at me! I have such-and-such kernel vulnerabilities!"
I think there's a patch to replace the kernel's RAM image without
rebooting, so soon the world may once again be safe for those who
like to gloat.

Fri May 19 2000 07:54:
It took me forever, but I finally found a decently sized version
of the map of the known universe mentioned in
this
BBC article. The large version is actually somewhat of a disappointment,
as the BBC added shading to their tiny version of the graphic to make
the map look a lot nicer than it does.

Fri May 19 2000 08:28:
For the past week I've been trying to get a working symbol table
and abstract syntax tree. I'm almost there, but I'm also very
worried that I've wasted a week getting a pretty symbol table
and syntax tree and that by the time I get it working, I won't have
time to do any semantic analysis.

Fri May 19 2000 11:22:
The symbol table works now. I have now succeeded in getting rid of a whole bunch of crap
associated with the table presented in the sample code,
including the fact that it had to know about the AST and the fact
that two of the classes were not done as classes but as typedefed
structs with associated functions. So, with six days to go on the
project, I have a very nice symbol table which is 10% of the
grade. Did I mention that I have a philosophy paper due in a week?

Sat May 20 2000 11:49:
The abstract syntax tree construction code is about to start
working, I think. Programming in C or C++ is like building a watch
with a million little gears. You build all these components and then
you try to get all the gears to mesh together. I get sick of this
very quickly. I'd much rather be building things with Legos. Metaphorical
Legos, I mean. Or real Legos, for that matter.

I keep moving responsibility for the symbol table between the
scanner and the parser. It was in the scanner, then I moved it to the parser, then I decided I could
do it in the scanner after all, then I decided that I couldn't. I'm still
fairly sure that I couldn't, because the parser doesn't know whether
an identifier is part of, eg., a declaration (in which case it goes in the
symbol table) or a statement (in which case it's an error if it's not
already in the symbol table).

Sat May 20 2000 11:58:
I currently have 2218 errors in my code. This is a record. The
2218 errors were caused by the fact that I thought C had an "until"
construct like Perl, and I put such a construct into my yacc file.

Sat May 20 2000 15:01:
I'm now ready to begin filling in my Check functions. This is (almost)
where everyone else is. Good job, me.

Sat May 20 2000 21:40:
A lot of semantic checking code has been written but it doesn't work
yet. Same old story. Bleah.

The semantics of the language are defined primarily through test
cases. Right now there are 33 test cases. The TA has a bounty on new
test cases but no one is biting because a new test case means more
semantics and therefore more work for everybody. Some of the test
cases are really easy to make work and some of them are going to be
nightmares.

The various array assignment cases (where you have to
make sure that two arrays have the same dimensions, or that an
array has a certain number of elements) and the function call case
(enforcing the requirement that the number and types of arguments
to a function correspond to the formal arguments to the function)
look like the toughest ones.

Sun May 21 2000 05:47:
Past the impasse that stymied me last night. I just fixed yet
another bug in my scanner. It didn't recognize the modulus operator.
How did I get this far with that kind of bug? That probably cost me
5% off the last project.

Sun May 21 2000 06:11:
I realize that my struggles with the semantic checker do not make
for thrilling reading. But such is my life.

Sun May 21 2000 09:10:
There is someone in the building across from my building who has
two techno albums. They've been playing both of these albums every
day since the start of school. The intervening distance and walls
cut out most of the treble and midrange, making the songs sound even
more like each other than your average techno song sounds like your
average other techno song. I think that sometimes they repeat a track they
really like, but I'm not sure. It might be a different song.

I swiped Dan's headphones (he's asleep) and put on the Mass in
B Minor, but I can still hear that annoying techno drum machine.
I curse the guy who invented the drum machine (forgot his name). It doesn't take much
skill to play the drums (I speak from experience), but even the
modicum of talent required to do so would be enough of a barrier to entry to
prevent much techno music from being produced. Jumping frogs? I
must avoid this technology!

Jake is going to come to the defense of the drum machine in
an impassioned plea, I just know it. Celeste too, probably.

Sun May 21 2000 09:21:
On reflection, I have decided that cursing the drum machine is
not the answer. The answer is cursing people who play loud music
without headphones, especially when they keep playing the same
two albums for months on end.

Sun May 21 2000 09:25:
Also, the phone always rings at around this time, it's always someone
different, it's always for Dan, and Dan is always asleep when it happens. I don't
understand it (I do understand Dan being asleep, since he goes
to sleep at 6 AM).

Mon May 22 2000 03:53:
You don't even want to know what I spent all day doing. Oh man,
it was painful. I was a nervous wreck by the time it was done.
However, I FINALLY have the infrastructure needed to do all the
semantic checking, and I have a good chunk of that code written
from last time.

Mon May 22 2000 04:02:
That entry makes it sound like I spent yesterday as an unwilling
contract killer or something. I spent yesterday tearing apart my
abstract syntax tree and symbol table code and putting it back together
again.

This compiler has more pointers than anything else I've ever
written. And I mean that from the bottom of my heart.

Thanks to Celeste for calling me last night when I was a nervous
wreck and talking me down.

Pope John XXIII: In 1917, three Portuguese shepherd
children were visited by the Virgin Mary and given three secrets.
The first and second, which predicted World War II and the Bolshevik
revolution in Russia, were made known to the Vatican in 1943. It's
now 1960, and time to reveal the third secret. The envelope, please.

Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Angelo Sodano: It's
now 2000, and time to finally reveal the third secret of Fatima. The
envelope, please.

[Cardinal Sodano opens the envelope and reads the secret.]

Cardinal Sodano: Ah! The secret speaks of the 1981 attempt on
the life of his holiness John Paul II. Specifically, it speaks of
'a bishop clothed in white' who 'falls to the ground, apparently dead,
under a burst of gunfire.'

Mon May 22 2000 19:40:
On the silly names for Susanna thread, a bit of prehistoric Leonardonics:
the original names I called Susanna were "Moby", "Yummy Moby", and "Mo" (rare). They all came
from a riddle in a book of dumb jokes given me to pass the time
on a car trip. The question was something along the lines of
"What's large, yellow, and stabbed at from Hell's heart by Captain
Ahab, spat at for hate's sake with his last breath?" Obviously
that wasn't the original question, but there may have been reference
to Melville's masterwork. The answer was "Moby Banana". Susanna
had a nickname (not a name-calling name) "Susanna Banana", so I
started calling her Moby.

I have no idea where the "Yummy" in
"Yummy Moby" came from; my only justification is that I said "yummy"
a lot when I was a kid, probably more than I should have. I blame
those motivational children's song tapes. Oh boy, I've got joy.

Tue May 23 2000 08:05:
This is so good. It took me forever to do this design, but now
that I have it, adding semantic checks is a piece of cake. Even
something complicated like "in a function, all return statements
must return a value that can be coerced into the return value type
of the function", which requires you to scan every single statement in
a function, only takes a few minutes to write.

Tue May 23 2000 21:11:
My semantic analyzer now works on 21 of the test cases. I believe
the TA has chosen 25 of the 35 which he will use, so probably
15 of those cases will be ones that I can handle, which gives me
an estimated grade of 60%.

Reminder to myself to work on cases 14, 18, 13, 17, and 11
tomorrow. If I can get these working, my estimated grade will go
up to 74%, which I'm fairly sure will be above average.

Wed May 24 2000 05:37:
Test case 14 (Love potion #14) had a syntax error in it (a comma
instead of a semicolon). I fixed it and my checker caught the
semantic error right away. Woohoo!

Wed May 24 2000 09:02:
All those test cases work now. 31 and 32 also work. If I have time I
can do #12 and #22. Right now I should work on my paper, since my
expected grade on the semantic analyzer right now is 83%.

Wed May 24 2000 17:35:
I have one successful submission of my semantic analyzer. If I
decide to work on it some more I can do another one. From scuttlebutt
and general attitude around the class, I'm pretty sure that
very few people have even been able to start on the semantic analysis portion of
the project. So even though it took me an insanely long amount
of time to get a design that worked, it took less time (and was
probably less frustrating) than it would have to have gone with the
original horrible design.

Wed May 24 2000 17:49:
I should point out that "Yummy Moby", "Moby", etc. are
impersonal nouns, not titles. So Susanna was not Yummy Moby, she
was the Yummy Moby.

Leonard: Angband is the only open source project I know
of that has fragmented to the extent that people who want open
source projects to fragment want open source projects to fragment.

[Long pause.]

Leonard: Can you think of another?

Dan: I'd have to parse what you just said first.

Wed May 24 2000 20:01:
Why do people think they can send arbitrary press releases to
editor@segfault.org? What do they think is going to happen? Weren't
they paying attention when I mocked
them?

Wed May 24 2000 20:21:
I want to know about a diet I can live with and what is in the news message at news://news.jpl.nasa.gov/8gg0mv%243aq%241%40nntp1.jpl.nasa.gov.
We got 5 hits on Segfault from it today, but it's not a public newsserver
so I don't know what the article says. Does anyone read this who
has access to JPL's news server and can copy me on this message?

Thu May 25 2000 06:14:
Segfault got 24,999 pageviews yesterday. That's a record for as long
as I've been keeping track. But come on, 24,999? The impersonal forces
of the universe mock me.

Thu May 25 2000 08:10:
Wow, the people with the two techno albums are really loud today.
I can almost hear the vocals. Fortunately, I'm just about to leave.

Thu May 25 2000 10:56:
Is it unreasonable for me to avoid the geek news site kuro5hin because
the 7331sp33k (a bad idea in and of itself) makes it look like "kuro
five hin" (which is actually a better name for a geek news site
than "corrosion")? I understand it's a really good site, but the name
makes me want to stay far, far away from it. And vomit. Lots of
wanting to vomit.

Fri May 26 2000 05:53:
Spamming tip: When spamming someone, imply that they signed up
for your service and agreed to let you spam them. Many people
will figure they must have done so, even if they don't remember.

Fri May 26 2000 11:38:
It's not often that you see Richard Stallman actually being
sarcastic, but here it
is. "Surely it took a real clever guy to think of this?" Ouch.

Mon May 29 2000 10:29:
NTK isn't responding, so 1) I can't read the new NTK, and 2) I
can't see their link to the "Perl is finished" Segfault story (I'm
assuming it's that one as that's the only one that's gotten linked
from anywhere this past week).

Mon May 29 2000 15:40:
There's a point at which you come to realize that it's not all
part of your rock and roll fantasy.

Mon May 29 2000 15:59:
Are we really supposed to believe that a film called "Changes" is
about surfing and only about surfing?

Mon May 29 2000 16:24:
Thanks to Scott for emailing me the NTK in the UK. At least they referred
to us as Segfault and not SEGFAULT.

Mon May 29 2000 17:22:
Following the traditional redesign (it only took an hour this time),
I have successfully turned a program in the made-up language into
Java bytecode. The program in question assigns five to a variable.

Tue May 30 2000 06:46:
When we last left our hero[0], "Hello world" worked, as did "Hello 5",
but "Hello 0.4" did not, since the JVM handles floats in a weird way
which I have yet to take into account. I don't have time to work on
it this morning, since I have to read my stupid news clippings for my
stupid Oceans discussion. I can say that because I'm fairly sure that no
one connected with my Oceans class will ever read this. Man, I hate
that discussion. It's not because of the people. The professor and
the TA are both excellent. I just hate talking about news clippings.

My collab.net interview was my only interview which consisted in
part of debating the merits of BSD-type vs. GPL licenses.

That essay also has a lucid explanation of what the GPL actually
requires: "that
software authors should be required to make their source code
available to the same extent that they make the object code available."

Ray Carney: They were still crap. What people need is
movies like John Cassavetes' Faces.

Interviewer: But a lot of people walk out of Cassavetes'
movies because they're so depressing.

Ray Carney: It doesn't matter. That's what people need, and
if people had any sense they'd realize it.

At times I don't think the term "consumer advocate" is appropriate
for Mr. Carney, and at other times I think that it's perfectly
appropriate.

Tue May 30 2000 20:40:
I can't believe I {ate the whole thing, got an A- on that philosophy
paper}. For four years now I've been writing terrible college papers,
and, with only one left to go, I've yet to get
less than a B- on a paper. Some people might say that this empirically demonstrates
that my papers are not terrible. I scoff at such people.

In high school and junior high I wrote great papers, but my
standards were much lower. I wrote great poetry then, too.

Wed May 31 2000 07:35:
I can now assign to variables and print them out. I'm making
good money in my spare time!