If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

I didn't bother with the other 3 because you go out of your way to take quotes out of context.

Why did you take my quote out of context by eliminating the beginning and ending? Oh, that's right, because it makes it appear as if you "got me."

Sad that you have to do something like that (which is blatantly obvious, btw) to help support your flimsy, poorly thought out position.

So basically you admit that statement makes no sense I mean look at it you are saying 2 different things and no the other 3 are not out of contexts you actually meant to use them in your argument over Luke which od course are horrid arguments.

Saying I kiss little boys is still a better argument then something doesn't make sense like " I responded to your post stating that I dont think GM should evaluate players using video footage, which i never once said."

Still hasn't learn to effectively shed blocks at a college footbal level and he will not have the stacked NFL level Dline like he had college helping him with his picks. He should go to the 20's in the first round for his coverage alone but he was never the best defender on his team especially that choke artist of a performance last night, don't see how that merits a top 5 pick or say how weak of a LB class this is since he's been rated as the number 1 LB in the class several times.

There is a thread going on in the Vip room about what player you whiffed on in past draft's, i just hope it's not Te'o i have to add to my list............

You saying that you like to kiss little boys isn't an argument, its a statement. Now I see what the problem is. You have a problem understanding the meaning of words. No wonder you get along so well with little children; you have the same mental capacity as them.

So what's this "responded to your post stating that I dont think GM should evaluate players using video footage, which i never once said." you state something and deny it in the same sentence. Boy you really want this thread in the depths trying to insist I'm a pedo which I could care less if you think I was so don't put this in the depths of the sea mods.

So what's this "responded to your post stating that I dont think GM should evaluate players using video footage, which i never once said." you state something and deny it in the same sentence. Boy you really want this thread in the depths trying to insist I'm a pedo which I could care less if you think I was so don't put this in the depths of the sea mods.

÷
So you still can't admit your post made no sense? You've gone from insisting I'm. A pedo and pointing out my grammar mistakes to prove a point(Which I could care I'm on a phone and I could point out yours)