A system dynamics-based simulation study for managing clinical governance and pathways in a hospital

Abstract

This paper examines the development of clinical pathways (CP) in a hospital in Australia based on empirical clinical data of patient episodes. A system dynamics (SD)-based decision support system is developed and analysed for this purpose. The study highlights the scenarios that will help hospital administrators to redistribute caseloads among admitting clinicians with a focus on multiple diagnostic-related groups (DRGs) as the means to improve the patient turnaround and hospital throughput without compromising quality patient care. DRGs are the best known classification system used in a casemix funding model. Casemix is a DRG-based government funding model for hospitals with a mix of performance measures aiming to reward initiatives that increase efficiencies in hospitals. The classification system groups inpatient stays into clinically meaningful categories of similar levels of complexity that consume similar amounts of resources. Policy explorations reveal various combinations of the dominant policies that hospital management can adopt. With the use of visual interfaces, executives can manipulate the DSS to test various scenarios. Experimental evidence based on focus groups demonstrated that it can enhance group learning processes and improve decision making. The findings are supported by other recent studies of CP implementation on various DRGs. These showed substantial reduction in length of stay, costs and resource utilization.

Keywords

clinical pathways system dynamics decision support system diagnostic-related groups (DRG)

Chalmers I (1993). The Cochrane collaboration: Preparing, maintaining and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. In Warren KS and Mosteller F (eds). Doing More Good Than Harm: The Evaluation of Health Care Interventions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, NY USA, 703: 156–165.Google Scholar

Hindle D (1998). Classifying the care needs and services received by Home and Community Care (HACC) clients. Aged and Community Care Service Development and Evaluation Reports, Commonwealth Dep. of Health and Family Services, April, No. 33.Google Scholar

Holt P, Ward JE and Wilson A (1996). Clinical Practice Guidelines and Critical Pathways: A Status Report on National and NSW Development and Implementation Activity. NSW Health Department: Sydney.Google Scholar