The man who said to vote your conscience and to vote for the candidate who best upholds Constitutional principles was resoundingly booed exiting the convention stage by party delegates.

Conversely the male who heads the PayPal corporation currently boycotting North Carolina because of its law restricting men from using women’s bathrooms and who shamelessly declared his pride for being a homosexual was applauded, cheered, and given a standing ovation by the delegates at the convention.

Those delegates who booed Ted Cruz and cheered Peter Thiel don’t belong to the party of Lincoln and Reagan nor do they represent its principles and values.

Those delegates belong to the Party of Trump and represent his progressive principles and New York values.

Trump has said on several occasions that he doesn’t need the party’s conservative base to win in November and doesn’t want their vote.

So I am honoring Mr. Trump’s request to not vote for him, and I encourage every principled conservative, evangelical, and patriot to do likewise.

The X-Men comics and movies are really an allegory about homosexual culture and a stealth way to introduce homosexual propaganda to the general public. The mutant superheroes push a homosexual rights message and are in fact “stand-ins” for homosexual, lesbian, and transgender people.

“Since the comic appeared in the 60s, pop-culture critics have drawn parallels between the mutants’ struggle to gain wider acceptance for being genetically ‘different,’ and the gay community’s struggle for acceptance and recognition.”

Most of the homosexual propaganda in the X-Men movies can be attributed to Bryan Singer, the out-of-the-closet homosexual who directed “X-Men,” “X2: X-Men United,” and “X-Men: Days of Future Past,” and produced of “X-Men First Class.”

“[W]hat better way than in a giant, action, summer event movie! I could think of no better place to spill out one’s own personal problems and foist them onto the world … “—Bryan Singer

The accused pederast director/producer adapted his personal feelings of being alienated and ostracized as a homosexual to the homosexuality/homophobia subtext of the movie series.

“[Y]ou feel kind of alone in the world because you’re separate from everyone else. … A gay kid doesn’t discover he or she is gay until around puberty. And their parents aren’t gay necessarily, and their classmates aren’t, and they feel truly alone in the world and have to find, sometimes never find, a way to live.”— Bryan Singer

The X-Men movies have pushed homosexual issues into the mainstream. The parallels between the mutants’ struggle to gain wider acceptance for being genetically different, and the homosexual community’s struggle for acceptance and recognition are demonstrably obvious.

“Like queers, these mutants discover their ‘difference’ during puberty and struggle to hide it from friends and family. They forge their self-identity when they meet others like them. And they grow up learning to fight the system that shuns and persecutes them.”—Helmi

For the X-Men, mutation is a pressing social issue and telling the world one is a mutant is a serious matter when most people are “mutantphobes.” “X2: X-Men United” presents a coming-out scene, complete with confusion and mutantphobia, when Bobby Drake, aka Iceman, and fellow mutants visit his family.

The “Have you ever tried not being a mutant” scene is the rhetorical equivalent of a homosexual, lesbian, or bisexual teenager’s “coming out” ritual. Like members of the homosexual community, mutants who go public risk family rejection, political and social marginalization, and physical violence.

Singer and the X-Men screen writers are portraying X-Men muntantcy and their struggle for acceptance in society as analogous to the homosexual community’s quest to make homosexuality the moral equivalent of heterosexuality.

In the article “Making Gay Sense of X-Men,” homosexual author William Earnest, writes “Singer and his screenwriters equipped X-Men and X2 with the rhetorical stealth needed to fly below the gaydar of many critics and audience members.”

X-Men: First Class, the prequel for “X-Men” and “X2: X-Men United,” continued the subtext messages of mutants as an allegory for the homosexual community. When Hank McCoy’s coworkers find out that he’s a mutant, they ask him why he hid his identity. McCoy tells them, “You didn’t ask; I didn’t tell,” which of course is an obvious reference to the military’s now defunct policy of “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.”

To lure openly gay activist actor Ian McKellen to play Magneto, Singer told him that mutants were comparable to struggling homosexuals and that X-Men is really about lesbain, gay, bisexual, and transgender people.

McKellen, an open homosexual and co-founder of the LGBT gay activist group Stonewall, admits that when he stays at hotels he tears out pages from the Bible that condemn homosexuality. McKellen told “Details” that a married couple had sent him a package containing 40 pages torn from Bibles attached to a string with instructions to be hung in the bathroom and used for toilet paper.

“The main thing is to talk about gayness until the issue becomes thoroughly tiresome . . . If you can get [straights] to think [homosexuality] is just another thing—meriting no more than a shrug of the shoulders—then your battle for legal and societal rights is virtually won.”

The second stage is to silence all expression and support for dissenting opinion; and the third stage is to convert the public by spreading propaganda via the media to the nation.

To get a better idea of how well the propaganda has been working, the X-Men film series has grossed over $3 billion worldwide, making it the 12th highest-grossing film franchise of all-time, and the sad reality is very few of the millions who saw the films knew that they were being indoctrinated in subversive homosexual propaganda.

An African proverb says, “Don’t tear down a fence until you know why it was put up.” In other words, don’t discard a tradition or a practice until you understand why it was established and followed.

Heterosexuality and homosexuality are not moral equivalents. Civilizations have erected a metaphorical fence limiting sexual activity to men and women constrained in marriage. Throughout history, people scaled the fence to engage in premarital, extramarital, and homosexual sex, but the fence remained and the limits were visible and known to everyone. Climbing over the fence has always been recognized as a breach of those limits, even by the climbers themselves.

But now homosexual rights advocates are saying that there should be no fence, and that to tear it down is an act of liberation. Once the fence is torn down, adultery, polygamy, and pedophilia will become socially acceptable. Because no visible boundary to sexual expression will exist, civilization will ultimately collapse and disappear

Homosexual author Gabriel Rotello writes of the changes in homosexual behavior in the last century:

“Most accounts of male-on-male sex from the early decades of this century [20th] cite oral sex, and less often masturbation, as the predominant forms of activity, with the acknowledged homosexual fellating or masturbating his partner. Comparatively fewer accounts refer to anal sex. My own informal survey of older gay men who were sexually active prior to World War II gives credence to the idea that anal sex, especially anal sex with multiple partners, was considerably less common than it later became.”

According to a 2001 New York Times story, the practice of anal sex increased, condom use has declined 20 percent and multi-partner sex has doubled in the last seven years, despite billions of dollars spent on HIV prevention campaigns. “In many cases, the prevention slogans that galvanized gay men in the early years of the epidemic now fall on deaf ears.”

As societal approval of homosexual behavior increases, so does the behavior. A 1993 Newsweek story reported that the increased social acceptance of homosexual behavior led teenagers to engage in homosexual sex, viewing it as chic. The Associated Press reported, “the way gays and lesbians appear in the media may make some people more comfortable acting on homosexual impulses.”

Studies show that some people change their sexual behavior, which makes it impossible to define that person as homosexual. For example:

“Does a man who has homosexual sex in prison count as a homosexual? Does a man who left his wife of twenty years for a gay lover count as a homosexual or heterosexual? Do you count the number of years he spent with his wife as compared to his lover? Does the married woman who had sex with her college roommate a decade ago count? Do you assume that one homosexual experience defines someone as gay for all time?”

Despite the difficulty in defining homosexuality, what is clear is that those who engage in same-sex practices or identify themselves as homosexual, lesbian, or bisexual constitute a very small percentage of the population. The most reliable studies indicate that 1-3 percent of people consider themselves to be homosexual, lesbian, or bisexual, or currently engage in homosexual sex.

Homosexual rights advocates are doing great damage to America’s social fabric and the American people. In promoting homosexuality as the moral equivalent of heterosexuality, they are killing Americans, killing society, and destroying the nation’s identity.

Nearly 11 million people in America are directly affected by cancer, while slightly more than three-quarters of a million are affected by AIDS, yet AIDS spending per patient is more than seven times that for cancer. And the inequity for diabetes and heart disease is even more striking. Consequently, the disproportionate amount of money spent on AIDS detracts from research into cures for diseases that affect more people.

In denouncing and marginalizing anyone who opposes and criticizes the gaystapo agenda as homophobic, homosexual rights advocates are destroying people’s humanity, physical being, and soul, and robbing researchers of funds that could help them develop treatments and cures for diseases that afflict tens of millions of people.