But terminating the shareholder's rights plan also means that they've ended some of the protections against a hostile takeover, doesn't it? And they ended it apruptly - that sounds like they may know of a takeover attempt soon & are trying to help it happen. Does that make sense?

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.