OK, that works fine out of the box. Thanks!
I'm not sure it is wise to scale down... better scale up what you expect (in
case they later come up with e.g. 89317, not just 81500).
BTW, the earlier one (4.7-1) didn't include ghostscript-devel in the
dependencies. It also gives lots of warnings when building. Is that OK?

Re: scaling: It's ghostscript that changed behavior here, not gsview, so my
first pass was to make ghostscript behave as before. When fc5 becomes closer to
reality, I'll take a closer look at ghostscript to see if the dll_revision
inflation is still there, and if so, inquire whether it's a bug or if it was
done on purpose (and why).
Re: ghostscript-devel, yep, that's so it can determine the proper default
libgs.so to load (so you don't have to go mucking with it). And yes, there as
lots of compiler warnings... mostly cruft from gtk+-1.2.

Note

You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.