Pacifist Japan no more? Tokyo to consider pre-emptive strike strategy

An interim report to be discussed by PM Shinzo Abe’s government suggests that a fundamental change in Japan’s military defense doctrine may be coming: a pre-emptive strike strategy against potential aggressors.

Abe's government is revising its defense policies, with an
interim report due on Friday, while the final conclusions on the
matter will be made by the end of 2013. The study explores the
ways to “strengthen the ability to deter and respond to
ballistic missiles,” Japanese media revealed on Thursday.

However, the report prepared by Japan’s Defense Ministry
reportedly does not mention by what measures would be taken
against foreign military bases if a threat became imminent.

At the same time Tokyo confirms it has no intentions of becoming
a nuclear power – despite the fact that its major potential
adversary, China, has been one for decades, possessing a
fully-fledged nuclear triad, while nearby North Korea has been
demonstrating nuclear ambitions since at least 2007.

“The acquisition of offensive capability would be a
fundamental change in our defense policy, a kind of philosophical
change,” a professor at the National Graduate Institute of
Policy Studies, Marushige Michishita, told Reuters. The scholar
stressed though that such an undertaking would be expensive and
time-consuming, because “It's easier said than done.”

Experts say that to get the pre-emptive strike ability may
require Japan to develop intercontinental and cruise missiles
along with a more powerful Air Force.

“It would cost lots of money, and take time, training and
education to acquire a robust and meaningful capability,”
Michishita concluded.

The Japanese leadership is moving further away from the pacifist
constitution imposed on Tokyo by the American occupation
administration over half a century ago. The last time Tokyo
updated its National Defense Program Guidelines was in 2010, with
the Democratic Party being in power.

The US-drafted Article 9 of the Japanese constitution prohibits
the very possibility for Japan to wage war and have its own
modern army. Despite that, today Japan boasts one of the best
armies in Asia.

Japanese servicemen have vast real warfare experience, having
taken part in all of the conflicts started by the US in the past
two decades. Japanese peacekeepers are also actively
participating in the UN missions in Africa and Asia.

To take part in international projects, Japan has already had to
ease its self-imposed ban on weapons exports. Now the leaders of
Japanese military industrial complex, giants like Mitsubishi
Heavy Industries Ltd, Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd, and Fuji
Heavy Industries Ltd, await clear guidelines for the promotion of
their military business overseas.

Because Japan has been stretching the limits of Article 9 for
decades, some say the change is evolutionary rather than
revolutionary. And since there have been no negative remarks on
Japan’s military development coming from Washington, it could
mean that Abe’s team is transforming nation’s military in a
direction not incompatible with the US.

The potential threats Japan might face at the moment come from
the Asian continent.

China not only has world’s largest army, but has been
dramatically modernizing its military forces over the last
decade. Pyongyang is an old adversary of Washington, rivaling
American dominance in the Pacific. As for Japan, it has
territorial disputes over the Senkaku Islands (Diaoyu in Chinese
tradition) with China, meaning that Washington’s and Tokyo’s
interests coincide.

On the other hand North Korea, that strives to achieve a nuclear
power status, has been openly threatening Tokyo with destroying
US military bases on Japanese territory.

To deal specifically with territorial disputes at remote islands,
Japan reportedly plans to establish a Marines task force.
Purchase of unmanned surveillance drones is also planned to
monitor the country’s maritime borders.