It's OK to declare that women are from Venus

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com |
Say you are a clever university president named Larry. You have an old friend, Marty, whose own institute is situated just down the road from you. You have a few problems at your university, and when you get an invitation to hash through them at Marty's, you zip right over. After all, the arguments at Marty's are provocative and factual. There is nothing you love better than such rip-roaring exchanges.

Besides, some good may come of it. Anything that is debatable is soluble.

The Larry in this instance is, of course, Lawrence Summers of Harvard University, former U.S. Treasury secretary during the Clinton presidency. Marty is the economist Martin Feldstein of the National Bureau of Economic Research. And the conference, hosted by another economic eminence, Richard Freeman, did not turn out well for Summers. Foras is known by nowone challenge that Summers sought to address was that women today are not winning as many tenured posts in the "hard" sciences, such as advanced math or physics, as might be expected in the post-feminist era. Another was that more men than women tend to score in the very top range of math aptitude tests.

Summers also touched on the proposition that there might be a genetic difference between men and women when it came to performance in hard sciences. This last little hypothesis was enough to bring the entire educational establishment down upon Summers' head. A week ago, Summers issued his first apology, and he has been apologizing ever since.

The controversy is part of a Larry pattern. While at the Treasury, he angered plenty of people with his handling of the Mexican bailout of the mid-1990s; he angered others and apologized when he charged citizens who supported repeal of inheritance taxes with "selfishness." At Harvard, he infuriated law-school teachers by reasserting the president's authority over the choice of a dean. Eminent professors departed for other universities after he assailed departments for grade inflation. Yet more outrageous at least from the point of view of some senior professors was his requirement that academic stars should do more teaching. His call for a patriotic response from Harvard after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, angered left-leaning faculty. And now, the woman gaffe.

One might conclude from this record that Summers is simply too arrogant for his current job title. Controversial arguments are fine when they come from a whiz kid. And Summers, the nephew of two Nobel Prize winners in economics, was a whiz kidan irritatingly high scorer. His doctoral dissertation won him a tenured spot at Harvard before he was 30. A university president is like a chief executive. There are clearly things he can and cannot say.

But this argument misses the point. The trouble is not that Summers is too self-satisfied. It is that Harvard is.

Harvard, and universities like it, tends to promulgate a set of views global warming is a crisis; the U.S. is to blame for the world's troubles; and quotas or some form of affirmative action is required when it comes to the advancement of women and minorities. These same universities often shut out, or look away from, arguments that do not support these beliefs.

The result is not "neo-Stalinist" monoliths novelist Michael Crichton's description of universities in his current best seller, "State of Fear." But it is universities that are boring, provincial, shut in.

Summers was trying to kick open doors to recapture for Harvard the sense of intellectual possibility that leads to progress. The "woman" controversy is a good example. The fact that more math prodigies are boys is not even hypothetical; the data have been out there for decades. When tested in hard sciences girls tend to clump in the middle of the statistical range. Boys, by contrast, are more spread out hitting stellar highs and humiliating lows more frequently. If, after decades of promoting girls, boys still do better, it is not crazy to wonder whether the difference is hardwired. And since the Harvards of the world tend to take only the tip-top scholars of hard science, it stands to reason they would hire more men than women. As Steven E. Rhoads, the author of "Taking Sex Differences Seriously," points out, to acknowledge this specific hard science difference is not to deny the advance of women in other fields, even those once perceived as hopelessly patriarchal: the law, medicine.

What is more, this knowledge does not necessarily mean that female physicists will never get tenure. It also does not mean there is no discrimination against women. If statistics dictate that you will never meet a female Einstein, you may not be able to recognize her when you do meet her. The reality as most working adults know is that modern universities and corporations are both sexist and sanctimoniously politically correct. Such are the nuances Summers and colleagues might have been able to work through if the prissier among them had not walked out and called the Boston Globe.

After all, everyone can agree that if you deny a problem, you ensure that you cannot correct it. In short, places such as Harvard need people such as Summers. Larry: Stop apologizing.

Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington
and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

01/25/05: Soros should revive the old liberalism 01/11/05: Fannie Mae's story is not one of corporate greed, or executive compensation, or the challenges of accounting regulation standards. It's a story of moral hazard
12/22/04: Focus on growth, not backbiting12/09/04: Tide of democracy sweeps the globe: Prospects for free elections becoming a trend11/30/04: Change the tax regime to help America save
11/11/04: Ignore the scaremongers  Social Security `crisis' fixable11/01/04: U.S. election about class, not politics 10/20/04: Reckless and extreme10/06/04: Under construction: Threat of nuclear proliferation09/19/04: A no-confidence vote in consumers09/08/04: Caught in a triangulation traps 09/01/04: Competitive endgame 06/22/04: Oil as a curse06/16/04: What de Gaulle can teach us about Iraq05/18/04: Why trade matters in a time of war: Promising steps by U.S. and EU against protectionism 05/12/04: Let's face it, planning your life to reduce your tax bill is a time-honored and legal tradition 04/29/04: Being caught between 2 complicated syndromes: The high cost of living in big cities and the progressive structure of the U.S. tax code04/20/04: Kerry's Misery Index is just sad04/15/04: John Kerry's tax the rich mantra won't get the jobs done04/02/04: Faithful following at the White House02/25/04: It's back to the Dark Ages on trade02/20/04: Trust the U.S. or trust Al Qaeda 02/12/04: A Political Year of Yalies: Boola Boola for Meritocracy 02/04/04: Here's what America doesn't need: Another New Deal01/15/04: Forget Mars, U.S. economy looking like the final frontier12/30/03: Bob Bartley put morality's place in the market economy12/18/03: Mission accomplished: 1991's, that is12/11/03: Shrugging off outdated data: Inside America's economic machine11/13/03: Leaving a little something for the kids? Good luck11/05/03: Never, Never will we Desist09/30/03: Tax, lies and a few supply-side parables
10/09/03: Free markets are the key to rebuilding Iraq

09/25/03: Don't be sentimental, Mr. Bush08/12/02: Howard Dean, Robin Hood05/29/02: Berlin Diarist: To believe that by self-improvement and restraint, we can end tyranny03/27/02: The curse of oil11/12/02: Political Correctness at the Fed (No joke!)
10/31/02: Local enforcer who has changed national laws10/12/02: No Mirror for Europe; US is a picture of unity08/14/02: Keeping your financial eggs at home07/24/02: New Democrats' unaffordable luxury06/26/02: The evolution of eminent domain is the story of the lasting power of Supreme Court decisions to alter the American cultural fabric06/20/02: The distinction between known risk and uncertainty: What was lost in the Martha Stewart flap 06/11/02: Europe, long waiting for a chance to assert itself as independent from the US on the world stage, is clueless to terror's threat06/04/02: A Cold Warrior's lessons for the Middle East05/21/02: Geography does matter when it comes to development, but aid must nonetheless be linked to good governance 05/14/02: The increasing number of new claims is hurting innocent companies and making a mockery of the Common Law system05/09/02: Aid, development and guilt in our times of terror04/30/02: Wine lovers may at last be able to stray across state borders. The Internet is coming to the aide of free trade04/23/02: Taxation by way of Madison Avenue04/17/02: Special relationships and free trade do not mix04/08/02: Is terror the flip side of globalization?03/20/02 Bush gives aid but seeks results03/13/02 The Danger in policy by numbers02/26/02: States' smokescreen for tax hypocrisy02/20/02: Echoes of leadership against a global threat02/13/02: Jackson Vanik May be a Useful Analogy When Thinking About the Middle East02/07/02: Budgeting for victory: Requiem for a peace dividend02/05/02: The detectives of 1930s pulp fiction had a nose for clients bearing gifts. Sadly, those consulted by Enron did not01/22/02: Allow all American children a decent chance01/15/02: Do not disturb the profit-sharing revolution01/09/02: It is dangerous to elevate a currency as a political emblem if the need for other economic reforms is obscured01/03/02: There is only one way for a free thinker to bring up children 12/20/01: Why America's economy always bounces back12/18/01: When it comes to taxes, Washington lawmakers can learn a thing or two from The Honeymooners12/13/01: Bush opens a new era12/12/01: A flamboyant reversal for the Democratic party12/06/01: Threat of an oil embargo on the U.S. is a bluff11/29/01: Which is more important--the war or diplomatic comity?11/20/01: Unbalanced by a wealth of oil and diamonds10/17/01: Afghanistan Needs a General MacArthur09/27/01: The US has gained an understanding of the costs of war for which its European allies have hitherto wished in vain
09/13/01: War against terrorism will rise from the ashes08/15/01: Geography is no excuse for the state's economic stagnation. Its policymakers should take a leaf from Ireland's book08/07/01: Teamsters may pay a heavy price for winning its batle in Congress07/25/01: Towards a patent-free nirvana?07/17/01: History proves the lasting value of tax cuts 07/10/01: Stem cell research has awakened a bitter debate in Washington but voters care more about other electoral issues
07/03/01: America foots the bill for Europe's largesse06/26/01: America the litigious, land of the lawyer's fee06/20/01: Five reasons for gloom about global growth
06/18/01: Show pity for Alice in Tax Wonderland06/13/01: America must take a French lesson in trade06/11/01: Time to dream the impossible dream for Iraq06/07/01: Whatever happened to simple?06/04/01: When the relationship between companies becomes as close as a marriage, the eventual break-up is often very painful06/01/01: Loving and hating the Bush tax bill05/30/01: Will Grisham soon be unemployed? In America's courts these days, there's no room left over for legal fiction05/22/01: Republicans sample the rhetoric of confidence05/16/01: Boeing has been promised $60m to site its headquarters in Illinois. The deal looks a poor one for taxpayers05/14/01: Adam Smith in love05/09/01: Those rotten Russian capitalists 05/07/01: Why tax havens provide shelter for everyone05/04/01: Middle classes pay for get-the-rich folly05/01/01: Money can't buy happiness? Think again. 04/26/01: Calling America's rogues and entrepreneurs04/19/01: High earners right to feel lonely at the top04/11/01: The right must learn the comfort of strangers04/04/01: When domestic law arrives by the back door03/30/01: A Lexus tax cut suits the jalopy driver03/27/01: The unchallenged dominance of King Dollar03/20/01: Natural selection of an intellectual aristocracy03/16/01: The hidden danger of a regulatory recession03/14/01: Is the American condition that boring? Why so many Oscar nominated movies aren't set in America03/07/01: Trampling on the theory of path dependence03/05/01: Fighting the good fight03/01/01: It is time for Fannie and Freddie to grow up02/27/01: IT's important02/22/01: The guilty conscience of America's millionaires02/14/01: The benefits of helping the 'rich'02/09/01: The Danger and Promise of the Bush Schools Plan02/05/01: Crack and Compassion 01/31/01: Debt is good01/29/01: Clueless01/24/01: A gloomy end for a half-hearted undertaking01/17/01: The challenge of an ally with its own mind01/15/01: An unexpected American family portrait01/10/01: A fitting legacy for America's beloved dictator 01/08/01: The trick of tax 'convenience' 01/03/01: Time to stop blaming Greenspan over taxes 12/11/00: So smart they're dumb 12/06/00: How economic bad news came good for Bush12/04/00: The Boies factor 11/30/00: "The inevitable demands for recounts erupted like acne…"11/28/00: Fair play and the rules of the electoral game11/23/00: The shining prospect beyond a cloudy election11/21/00: Try the Cleveland model11/16/00: A surprising winner emerges in the US election11/09/00: Those powerful expats11/07/00:
What's right for America versus what works11/02/00: Time to turn off big government's autopilot10/30/00: Canada beating America in financial sensibility10/26/00: When progressiveness leads to backwardness10/24/00: The most accurate poll10/19/00: The Middle East tells us the hawks were right 10/17/00: The split personalities of America's super rich 10/10/00: 'Equity Rights' or Wake up and Smell the Starbucks10/04/00: Trapped in the basement of global capitalism09/21/00: The final act of a grand presidential tragedy09/21/00: Europeans strike back at the fuel tax monster. Should Americans follow?09/18/00: First steps to success09/13/00: America rejects the human rights transplant09/07/00: Minimum wage, maximum cost09/05/00: Prudent Al Gore plans some serious spending08/31/00: A revolution fails to bring power to the people08/28/00: A reali$tic poll08/21/00: "I Goofed" 08/16/00: Part of the union, but not part of the party
08/09/00: Silicon Alley Secrets08/02/00: Radical Republicans warm up for Philadelphia07/31/00: I'll Cry if I Want To07/27/00: Cold warrior of the new world07/25/00: The Estate Tax will drop dead07/18/00: Shooting down the anti-missile defence myths07/14/00: A convenient punchbag for America's leaders07/07/00: How to destroy the pharmaceutical industry07/05/00: Patriots and bleeding hearts06/30/00: Candidates beware: New Washington consensus on robust growth stands the old wisdom on its head06/28/00: White America's flight to educational quality06/26/00: How Hillary inspired the feminist infobabes