Proactively “From the Sea”; leveraging the littoral best practices for a paradigm breaking six-sigma best business case to synergize a consistent design in the global commons, rightsizing the core values supporting our mission statement via the 5-vector model through cultural diversity.

Monday, February 04, 2013

As the calendar gets harder to fudge - not to mention the budget, I think we will be seeing more iterations of this - something we have warned you about for years.Via Chris Cavas at DefenseNews;

The U.S. Navy has revised its overall fleet size requirement from 313 to 306 ships — a modest downscaling that reflects modified operational requirements and is not the result of the ongoing budget crisis.

One of the key changes is a reduction in the long-standing 55-ship littoral combat ship (LCS) requirement to 52 ships — a decrease, the Navy said, resulting from a lessening of the presence requirement to support U.S. Africa Command.

The changes are reflected in a congressionally mandated report sent Jan. 31 to key lawmakers.

The fleet reduction modifies the 313-ship number established in 2005. Navy leaders in recent years have called that figure “about 313 ships,” reflecting several assessments that moved the number up or down, but until now have not settled into a figure officials were willing to declare.

“A 306-ship force structure represents the minimum level of capability and capacity to meet projected threats and support the 2012 Defense Strategic Guidance,” Navy spokeswoman Lt. Courtney Hillson said. “Our operational tempo over the past year reaffirms our need for a minimum of 306 ships. That said, we need to have the right mix of ships in terms of their capabilities that are ready to meet combatant commander demands.”

The new number is not intended as a hard figure the fleet will grow to and then maintain. Rather, it is an overall combat force structure requirement, around which actual numbers are expected to rise or fall.

hey there and thank you for your information – I've certainly picked up something new from right here. I did however expertise a few technical points using this website, since I experienced to reload the web site many times previous to I could get it to load properly. I had been wondering if your web hosting is OK? Not that I'm complaining, but slow loading instances times will sometimes affect your placement in google and can damage your quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords.Well I'm adding this RSS to my e-mail and can look out for a lot more of your respective fascinating content. Make sure you update this again soon.

I do nοt lеаve а lot of responses,but after reading some of the responsеs hеre "Slowly Adjusting to Reality".I actuallу do have a couple of questіons fοг уοu if it's okay. Could it be just me or do some of the responses look like they are left by brain dead visitors? :-P And, if you are writing at additional places, I would like to keep up with you. Would you make a list of every one of all your public pages like your twitter feed, Facebook page or linkedin profile?