Last night, Jeanine and I went to see the hippie jam band, Leftover Salmon at the Roseland Theater. I'd seen them before back in the late 90s. I believe the current incarnation of the band includes only two members from that time: Drew Emmett, the singer/mando-fiddle-guitar player, and Vince Herman, the guitar-player/front man. Banjo, keyboards, bass, and drums rounded out the ensemble. Alas, I don't remember the names of the other members.

As you might guess from the instruments involved, Leftover Salmon has its roots in blue-grass. But, being a jam band, they take it in many different directions over the course of the show. The way it works is this: the rhythm section hold things down, while the other members take turns soloing between verses.

Roseland full up

Roseland boasts a capacity of over 1400, and I imagine last night's crowd approached that number. It was pretty tight, especially down on the main floor. People were having a good time. And there were more than a few inebriates in the crowd. But, as is nearly always the case at hippie concerts, the vibe was happy and peaceful. Just another reason why I like hanging with hippies.

Here's a little taste of the show.

Jeanine and I stayed until the set break, then headed out just after 1AM. Can you believe it? We left before the show was over! I'm getting old. But not too old to manage a rally now and then.

View from Tabor

This morning, even though I hadn't slept but 2 or 3 hours, I pushed on up to the top of Tabor, determined to have one last look before the year was out. Old Man Hood was nowhere to be seen, withdrawn behind the fog and gloom. I suspect he conjured it up himself, rather than be bothered by the sight of supplicants on dead Tabor contemplating his imperious glory.

Follow the path

The last hours of the Year of Our Lord, 2011, slip away as I write. It goes down as a good year in my chronicle. No major disasters. A few laughs. A lot of love.

Friday, December 30, 2011

One thing I'll say for sure: the story depicted in David Fincher's much-ballyhooed The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is Swedish alright. Swedish to the bone. No other culture could produce such a dark, angstful tale of horror and perversion than that of a people oppressed by endless Scandinavian winter. Depravity beneath a thin veneer of respectability. "Like an IKEA cabinet," as one prominent character put it.

The film is based on the eponymous novel by Swedish author Stieg Larsson.

It's the story of Mikael Blomkvist (Daniel Craig), a disgraced journalist who is hired by wealthy industrialist Henrik Vanger (Christopher Plummer) to investigate a murder that occurred 40 years previously. Blomkvist enlists the help of Lisbeth Salander (Rooney Mara), a troubled young woman with a talent for hacking into computer security systems. As their investigation proceeds, the unlikely pair begins to discover the disturbing, unseemly truth about a prominent Swedish family.

The film is expertly crafted, as one might expect from Fincher, who's previous works include Fight Club, and the sci-fi masterpiece, Alien. And just as with those two films, Fincher maintains a consistent atmosphere throughout Dragon Tattoo. Viewers are haunted by dread of what is to be revealed. We don't know what it is, but we know we won't like it when we do.

Rooney Mara's performance in the title role, as an alienated social outcast with a gift, was intriguing; and Daniel Craig's portrait of a stoic, joyless Swede seemed apropos, given what I know about Swedes. But Plummer's performance was my favorite: a wealthy, half-mad industrialist nearing the end of his life and determined to know the whole ugly truth about his own family.

Most of the story takes place in a small town in northern Sweden known as Hedestad. But I especially enjoyed scenes depicting Stockholm, which brought back memories of my visit there in 1999.

At the conclusion of the film, I wasn't sure I had enjoyed it. I thought perhaps it was not the best film to view during these brief, gloomy days of early winter. But after a few hours' reflection, I'm coming to appreciate the film's texture and its uncompromising obduracy.

All in all, I've come to the conclusion that David Fincher makes good flicks. No doubt about it.

Go see The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, by all means. Just make sure you're up for it.

Thursday, December 29, 2011

A whirlwind Christmas trip to the snowbird home of Mom and Doug included a drive up to Sedona. Up to the red rock country that was homeland of the Apache and Yavapai until 1876 when those vanquished peoples were force marched, mid-winter over 180 miles of desert country. Hundreds died.

Bell rock

Some 10,000 people live there now. Sedona has been a tourist destination for 5 or 6 decades and modern-day retirees came to settle there in the 80s and 90s.

But the vivid strata delineated on the sandstone cliffs provide evidence that even the first humans, those who came to hunt the mammoths and camels and the giant sloths some 15000 years ago, were but johnny-come-latelys.

Some hold that this country is a center for vortices of spiritual energy revealed in the way the juniper trees reach up from the dry earth. Creosote, mesquite, and broom speckle the desert floor where black bear, cotton-tail rabbits, and even the vanishing mountain lions still roam.

The sights we have seen, together...

It is a haunted land. But the spirits are not human. They're older than that. They rest in their rocky strata, recalling ages past when the land was shaped by molten lava, or lay under ancient seas. The spirits call out yet, echoing a past that was lost long before the first men ventured here from their far-away savannahs.

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

With Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows, director Guy Ritchie confirms that he's onto a winning combination. This film is the second interpretation of this latest incarnation of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's indefatigable savant detective, with Robert Downey, Jr. in the title role and Jude Law as his faithful companion, Doctor Watson.

I was steeled for disappointment when I sat down in the theater. In my experience, sequel films rarely live up to the expectations of the initial. I can think of no more apt comparison than the Indiana Jones movies of the 80s. The first film, Raiders of the Lost Ark, was novel, frolicking, and delightful. The subsequent films didn't hold up nearly as well.

But A Game of Shadows surprised me by not just equaling, but surpassing its predecessor.

Just as with the first film, I was taken with the elaborate sets depicting London, Paris, and various European sites as they must have appeared in the late 1800s on the eve of the great industrial wars: squalid and enchanting, ominous, shadowy.

Robert Downey is, as one might expect of a first-rate actor, positively brimming with charisma and he lays it on thick in this film. The chemistry between him and Law, laced with a subtle homoerotic tinge, ("Lie with me, Watson," says a shirtless, lipsticked Holmes in one action-packed scene") sparkles. And the supporting cast, the gypsy mystic Madame Simza Heron (Noomi Rapace), Mycroft Holmes (Stephen Fry), Holmes' well-connected brother, and Professor Moriarty (Jared Harris), Holmes' villainous nemesis, contribute admirably.

With the addition of the new characters, and especially Harris' Moriarty, a complex tale of subterfuge unfolds. The plot is involved and requires sharp attention. The dialog is sharp and quick; the pace, unrelenting. There is plenty of shooting, plenty of explosions, but despite this, I would not hesitate to recommend (in fact, did recommend) this film to my easily-flustered mother.

Overall, A Game of Shadows is a visually-appealing, action-packed romp. If you're looking for good family entertainment, this film fits the bill quite nicely.

Friday, December 23, 2011

So, way back in the 70s, when I was a kid working in the grape fields in the Coachella Valley, in California, my Uncle Don took me and some of my cousins to see a movie in Palm Springs. I can't remember the name of the flick, but it was a documentary that purported to scientifically examine evidence that Earth had been visited by extra-terrestrial life. Indeed, the film suggested that early American civilizations (the Incan and Aztec empires in particular) owed much of their development to the knowledge imparted from spaceship-traveling aliens.

It was a boring flick, as I recall. The only memorable datum that came out of it was a prediction of the date when the aliens would return to Earth, as set by the Aztecs. (Or was it the Incas?) That date was December 24, 2011. Tomorrow.

I've held that date in my memory for three and a half decades. And tomorrow I will learn, we will all learn, the truth of the film's prediction.

This Christmas, we will either awake to a brand new world full of possibility brought about by renewed contact with a benefactor race or we will awake to our old world (also full of possibility) in which we continue to struggle with our relentless demons while teetering on the brink of catastrophe.

I'd give odds in favor of the latter, but you never know, eh? Either way, the world will be irrevocably changed on the morrow. Just like it is on every morrow.

So, while this world is still as it is on this day, let me extend my best wishes for every good soul who might read these words. Old or new, our world has been and will be beautiful.

Let's live as if we were worthy of salvation. Be kind. Heal. Help. Love.

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Eve of the solstice, I dreamt I was back in Salem, in my tween years, calling my best friend, Edward. In my dream, a number presented itself: 363-7190. It is possible that that was, in fact, Edward's phone number, back in the day. No way to know at this point. Who knows what random bits of knowledge are tucked away in our minds?

In my dream, I was calling him for reassurance, just like I used to back then. But the dream shifted before he could pick up.

I stood in the foyer of our house in southeast Portland. I'd just come in the door. It was warm in the house and I was pulling off my jacket. Then Maty was hanging on my neck. Her face was pushed into my collar and I could feel warm tears on my skin. "What's the matter, sweetheart?" I asked. Inconsolable, she couldn't answer.

Eventually, I awoke, relieved. My dark dream was over. And the solstice had arrived.

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Scene: Tuesday night, December 21st, 2011. Speaker of the House John Boehner is sitting alone at the grand mahogany desk in his Speaker's office. His staff has all gone home for the evening. He can hear the whine of a custodian's vacuum cleaner from the hall outside. He opens the shallow drawer at the left side of his desk, pulls out a bottle of Old Crow, unscrews the lid and takes a quick nip. He does not notice the figure that suddenly appears in the doorway.

Senate Minority Leader McConnell: Old Crow, John? I must say, it is good to see the Speaker of the House patronizing his whiskey-distilling neighbors to the south.

[Boehner's startled exhalation is a whiskey mist that sprinkles the surface of his desk.]

Boehner: Jesus! Don't you ever knock?

McConnell: The door was open, John. I just wanted to wish you a Merry Christmas before I left for home. I won't be back here until after the new year.

McConnell [smirking]: I know what you're going to say. So let me save you some time. The answer is "no."

Boehner: Will you do me the courtesy of at least letting me get the question out before you turn me down? Come in here and sit down!

[McConnell steps into the room and sits at the desk across from Boehner.]

Boehner: Listen, Mitch, I won't lie. If I were in your shoes, I'd be putting the screws to me, too. But think about it. Who'd you rather deal with? Me? Or Cantor?

McConnell: You know the answer to that, John. I hate that snot-nosed punk. But there's not a lot I can do. I hope to be in the Majority Leader's office in the next Congress. The only way for that to happen is for Senate Republicans to support the two month extension to the payroll tax holiday. And, unlike you, I still have a degree of respect from my caucus.

Boehner: Respect? Don't be a fool. If you win the majority next year, you'll have more than just Mike Lee and Rand Paul to deal with. You think those Tea Party yahoos like you any more than they like me?

McConnell: Times change, John. What looks like gold today, might turn out to be nothing but yellow tinfoil.

Boehner: Real folksy, Mitch. Mark Twain's got nothin' on you.

McConnell: It's that kind of snark that got you into hot water in the first place.

Boehner: Listen to me, Mitch. You've got McCain and Lugar and Scott Brown out there saying things that make me look bad. It makes us all look bad, Mitch. If you can't shut those guys up, the payroll tax holiday is gonna expire! Don't you know what that means? It means that the Republican party will be responsible for raising taxes!

Monday, December 19, 2011

Three days from solstice I walked in the dark through Laurelhurst Park. The cold had a bite to it. Darkness rushed to its fell revelry. Stalwart pathway lamps shone like the besieged heroes of a lost city.

I called my brother while I walked. Brother Eric and I bemoaned our various physical infirmities, now that the bloom has come off our respective roses. We've had more than one talk on this subject in recent years. Time passes so quickly.

As I passed my favorite coffee bar, I glanced in and caught a glimpse of a barista I know. A man in his early thirties. He was standing behind the counter. He's a tall fellow and easy to spot. Dark hair cut short and close, and a distinctive handlebar mustache. His face was lifted toward the ceiling, but his eyes were cast down his nose toward the person with whom he was speaking, a patron at the shop.

This image lasted no more than a second. I did not break pace as I strode past the facade windows. But in that instant I swear I saw my coffee-serving friend transmogrify. His hairline receded to a point high on top of his head. His chin became less pronounced, pulling back into his neck which grew thick and dark with stubble. His shoulders slumped and his abdomen pushed out. Creases grew from the corners of his eyes and mouth.

And then I had passed.

It was a puzzling thing. Passing strange. It seemed that the barista went from vital youth to humbled middle-age in a flash.

Of course, it wasn't possible. But I had no inclination to double-back and lay the illusion to rest. What if it wasn't an illusion? What if I were to glimpse my own reflection in the divining glass?

I do not care to see myself in the future. There is no need. I know what's coming and I'll get there soon enough anyway.

Sunday, December 18, 2011

Recently, I've had conversations with self-described "science fiction" writers about the (rather lofty) subject of literature.

I'm afraid I take a rather dim view of arguments that hold genre fiction to be literature. I've raised a lot of hackles over the years, even amongst respected friends, by suggesting that any book that is ascribed a crass label like "fantasy," "science fiction," "romance," "thriller," or "what-have-you" cannot be literature. Labels categorize. They restrict. Genre fiction, then, is confined by the label that identifies it.

Art, literature, cannot sustain such confinement and remain art.

For example, consider Professor Tolkien. The sadly misguided Time columnist, Lev Grossman, referred to Tolkien as "the master of epic fantasy." (Please refer to my previous post, George RR Martin: American Tolkien?)

Were Professor Tolkien alive today, I suggest he would have been puzzled by that appellation. Professor Tolkien didn't set out to write a "fantasy" novel. He created a mythos with a (very Catholic) morality and an examination of the nature of good and evil. The Lord of the Rings trilogy was a by-product of his invention.

With genre fiction, these purposes are reversed. The prime objective of genre fiction is to tell a story that meets with certain criteria. (Science fiction, for example, emphasizes technology, or futurology. Fantasy involves the supernatural. Mystery novels involve crime, and so on.) Rather than examining truths or exploring eternal questions, genre fiction seeks merely to tell a story that falls within the parameters defined for it.

This is in no way meant to suggest that science fiction or fantasy or murder detective books are not worthwhile, skillfully written, or entertaining. Who doesn't love a lark into a dragon-populated Disneyworld or a hyperspace leap across light years? And writers like Frank Herbert, Roger Zelazny, or George RR Martin can certainly captivate and enthrall. But these books are diversions, not literature.

Ezra Pound said “Great literature is simply language charged with meaning to the utmost possible degree.” So long as that single criterion is met, the setting can be anything: a space ship in a far galaxy, a rat-infested back alley, or a grass hut on a beach. What defines a work as literature is its examination of the universal human condition.

Reading good literature, we recognize truths. We can't fail to recognize them, because they are eternal truths. Eternal, and eternally worthy of examination, because they remain just beyond our comprehension.

Thursday, December 15, 2011

He is not a nice human being. He is a bad person when it comes to demonizing opponents. When he puts on his political helmet he is a terrible person…. Let me tell you something: the Republican establishment will never make peace with Newt Gingrich. They just won’t. They won’t. This is an important point. Because the Republicans I talk to say he cannot win the nomination at any cost. He will destroy our party. He will re-elect Barack Obama, and we’ll be ruined. --Joe Scarborough, former Republican representative and television talk show host

These remarks, made by Joe Scarborough, who served as part of the House Majority when Newt Gingrich was Speaker in 1994, are not atypical of those made by national conservatives. Take a gander through the remarks made by other right-wing pundits. You'll see phrases like "hubristic volatility," "prevaricating," "unstable," and "temperamentally unsuited for the presidency."

Obviously, Newt Gingrich isn't getting a lot of love from Republican intelligentsia. The general sentiment among such folk is that a Gingrich nomination would mean disaster for the Republican party.

"Why can't they love me?"

But there's a problem. Mitt Romney, the only viable Republican alternative, is anathema to grass-roots Republicans. Check out any political forum on the internet. Conservatives use terms like "RINO" (Republican-in-name-only), "neurotic," "committed government spender," and "too slick and well packaged," to describe Mitt.

All of this makes apparent the fault line that exists between the upper and lower factions of the Republican party. The upper faction, the pundits and op-ed writers and king-makers, are terrified at the thought of a Gingrich nomination. The lower faction distrusts Romney's motives and his character.

Republicans are in a fix of their own making. After years of incendiary rhetoric, vilification of political opposition,and shrill insistence on ideological purity, Republican demagogues have convinced the GOP base that there can be no compromise; that alternate political philosophies are not just misguided, but evil. Well, they sold that message very well, apparently.

If we can believe the polls, Newt Gingrich is, at this moment, the favorite to win the Republican nomination. Newt gives voice to all the vitriol and contempt that grass-roots Republicans have for Democrats, Muslims, gays, and anyone else who is not a grass-roots Republican. Romney, a former blue state governor, a consensus-builder and a man who seems reluctant to vilify, cannot pass the ideological litmus test that the GOP base requires.

The real irony is that Newt Gingrich, with his long, ugly history of political flip-flops, over-the-top rhetoric, and unscrupulous opportunism, merits not a whit of trust or confidence from anyone. (Just ask his ex-wives.) But like any mob orator, he says nasty, ugly things about people. And that's what the GOP base wants. His positions on the various issues are beside the point.

We're less than a month from the Iowa caucuses and the GOP is divided into bitter, distrustful camps. For now, the knives are sheathed, but what might happen next is anyone's guess.

Will the fat lady sing? Will she invoke Republican Ragnarok?

We'll see soon enough. But whether it happens in January in Iowa, or some other time at some other place, the GOP is in for a bout of nasty internecine blood-letting. It couldn't happen to a nicer group of people.

Saturday, December 10, 2011

For inspiration, I went walking. I headed for the river. There is still that story that I must finish. That story about the river.

The morning was gray, cold, and unpromising. A ghostly shroud hung over the city. The thermometer read 34oF. Too warm for snow, but too cold for this time of year. The air was bitter on the flesh.

But a man must do what a man must do. So I set out.

Keepin' the team together

Two lost souls were encamped under the Hawthorne Bridge, near the bike path, near the Fire Station. The woman sat on a folded-out sleeping bag, on a tarp, on the ground. She wore a hoodie under a jacket. She'd covered her legs with blankets. The man, hooded and bearded, stood to one side.

"Are you keeping warm?" I asked. I directed my question to him.

He frowned in response to my query. He seemed upset. He stammered and mumbled, but couldn't quite get a thought out.

She answered for them: "We're tryin'," she said with a shake of her head. Her chin was long and loose. She had but 4 or 5 teeth.

Between the two of them, they'd seen some times.

"Where ya from?" I asked.

"Here!" she said. "Portland for forty-eight years."

"You know, there are places downtown that'll take you in," I said.

"Yeah, but they wanna break up the team," she said. She patted the blankets beside her. Somewhere under the folds a puppy whined. "We're a team," the woman said. "We gotta stay together. They don't want us to bring the dog."

"There's soup kitchens downtown," she said. "We don't have no trouble getting fed." She brightened suddenly. "But you know what helps? Propane. Or sterno. We got us a little stove here." She indicated a camping stove attached to a Coleman's propane bottle. "We run outta fuel."

"You gonna be here a while?" I asked.

"Where we gonna go?" she replied.

32o and holding

I got home in the early afternoon in time to get warmed up before Maty called.

Her call came just after 3pm. "I'm ready," she said. "Come get me and we gonna go to Winco." Which we did. The place was jam packed. People loading their carts with groceries. "With weather like this you never know," Maty said. "Maybe the power's gonna go out."

Thursday, December 08, 2011

On November 1, 1997, brothers Eric, Calee, and I found ourselves at the Hult Center in Eugene, Oregon to see our favorite rock band, Jethro Tull. I don't remember much about the show, itself, I'm afraid. I've seen so many Jethro Tull shows (perhaps a dozen), that they all run together.

But the reason this show stands out in my memory is because, after the show, my brothers and I hung out at the stage door to see if we could snag an autograph or two. (Eric and I got to meet Ian Anderson (himself!) in 1994 after a show in Portland.)

We waited for quite a while, along with probably two dozen other fans. As the time stretched, the crowd dwindled. Eventually, one of the security staff (and what an obnoxious lot they were) came out to announce that the band had all left by another exit.

As we turned to leave, two Englishmen, obviously with the band, came out. They saw us. "Sorry, fellows, everyone's gone," one of them said. "Except for Doane." He looked at his companion. "Doane's still here, isn't he?" The other man shrugged.

They'd hardly finished this exchange when Doane came out the door. He wore his iconic red beret. A gym bag was slung over his shoulder. Doane Perry stands some 6 and a half feet tall. His face is oval, with a high forehead and owlish eyes. He joined Jethro Tull as the band's drummer in 1984.

We were thrilled to meet him and he amiably agreed to sign our playbills. I wanted to make the most of the opportunity, but I couldn't think of a good question. It was Calee who finally came out with one. "Will you help me settle a bet with my brother? Who's a better guitarist? Steve Howe? Or Ian Anderson?"

I've always remembered Doane's answer. He smiled and shook his head. "There's no 'better' in music. There is 'faster' or 'more techincal.' But there is no 'better.'"

It was so self-evident that I felt foolish not knowing what his answer was before he said it. It is a lesson I've carried with me ever since.

Wednesday, December 07, 2011

That is how he dealt with things. When he was crowded by darkness, he lashed out with his terrible flames, dispelling the shadows, causing them to flee to the corners of his awareness. But when his fury subsided, they always returned. Despite his larger-than-life personality, his dazzle, his charm, he was yet an angst-ridden man, haunted by doubt.

Terrible ghosts followed him all the way to his grave. They linger yet, haunting me and the others he left behind.

But he wrote his own last chapter, these 10 years gone. The epilogue is for me.

The best times were when we laughed, when we traded jokes between us that no one else would understand. When we were invested by the good old nature, by the good old humor.

Monday, December 05, 2011

Dave and I are at it again. This time the game is RBCGIII. The big one.

As the game progresses, each of us will maintain a blog correspondence. We've a Gentleman's Agreement that neither of us will read his opponent's blog until given express permission to do so.

You can read Dave's blog here.
Readers are encouraged to comment! Speak your piece! Just be sure not to inadvertently reveal any information about Dave's plan to me or vice-versa.

Also, I'd be remiss (and have been remiss) in failing to express my gratitude to Rodney Kinney, the designer of the VASL game engine, which is the source of the illustrations Dave and I will use for our blogs. Thanks, Rodney! You're a good egg, old bean.

An attempt at balance

Here we go. Winter is nearly upon us. And winter is the perfect time to initiate that most engrossing of indoor activities: a Red Barricades campaign game.

I'll tell ya: get a fire in the fireplace; your wife and her friends are cookin' in the kitchen; you put on some music; burn a little ganja; then you and your buddy spend the day trading punches on the big RB map... Folks, that's high-livin' in my book.

I certainly can't remember how many campaign games Dave and I have played over the last 15 or so years, but we must be approaching two dozen by now. Many hours hunched over the gaming table.

And, as much as we enjoy the campaign games, we've come to the conclusion that none of them, CGI, CGII, or CGIII, is balanced. In our experience, CGI and CGII are nearly impossible for the Russians to win, while CGIII is unwinnable for the Germans. (Of course, dear reader, your experiences may differ. I'd be interested to hear other perspectives.)

So, this time, Dave and I are incorporating some "house rules" into the CGIII campaign to see if we might arrive at a more balanced campaign. Specifically, we've changed the CG victory conditions and made some modifications to the rules.

CG Victory Conditions: At the conclusion of any CG day, the German wins if he can draw a continuous perimeter that controls all but 5 stone locations west and north of the M45/U37 road, west of hexrow U, plus Buildings X9 (The Chemist's Shop) and B18 (The Commissar's House).

All but 5 locations to the left of the line, plus Chemist Shop and Commissar's House

In our experience, the Germans simply do not have enough resources to attain the CGIII Victory Conditions set forth in the ASLRB. So, rather than require that the Germans control all but 5 stone locations anywhere on the board, we've cut off the easternmost third of the map for victory determination. And given the vital importance of the Chemist's Shop and Commissar's House, we've also required that the Germans include those buildings within their perimeter. (I wrote up an explanation of why I think those buildings are important at the beginning of our last campaign game, which you can read here.)

Changes to CG rules

In addition to changing the VC, we're modifying the campaign rules to help the Germans a bit.

Disregard the campaign balance provision.
In our experience, the Germans nearly always win the first 4 or 5 days of any campaign, thereby invoking the balance for the Russians. After the first few days, the Russian can pretty much count on 18CPP in the refit phase. We want to rectify that.

For CPP replenishment, ignore all modifiers other than the historical modifiers.

No depletion rolls.
We've decided to forgo depletion rolls for this CG. All purchases are at full strength.

Armor recall/return.
We're adopting a rule wherein if a tank platoon is recalled at the end of a CG day, it will return to the battle if the player rolls a "1" during a subsequent Refit Phase. When a tank platoon returns, it enters as reinforcements and is again subject to recall at the end of that CG day. If a tank platoon is recalled a second time, it is gone for good.

The Germans replace one Pioneer company for a Sturm company and another Pioneer company for 2 rifle companies in the total forces available.

Stuka reinforcements consist of 2 '42 Stukas with bombs.

Flame-throwing tanks.
Each player may expend 1CPP in the purchase of a tank platoon in order to exchange one tank in that platoon for its equivalent flame-throwing tank. The Germans may do this twice in the campaign; the Russians once. This is a piece of chrome we're adding just for fun.

All of these modifications work to the German advantage, in our estimation. And it may be that we've gone too far. Or maybe we haven't gone far enough. I guess we'll see...

We agreed on all these modifications before determining sides. That way, we removed any subconscious advocacy for one side or the other. At least, theoretically. Once we had it all worked out, we selected sides randomly.

Friday, December 02, 2011

Last week, Governor Kitzhaber issued a reprieve of execution for convicted murderer Gary Haugen. The Governor effectively declared a moratorium on executions in this state for as long as he remains in office. In doing so, he follows in the footsteps of Illinois Governor George Ryan (a Republican) who declared a moratorium in his own state in 2000.

Governor Kitzhaber stated that the capital punishment system in this state is "a perversion of justice." He pointed out that, in the 27 years since voters passed a referendum legalizing capital punishment, only 2 persons have been executed, both of whom had waived their legal rights.

Disregarding the particluars of Haugen's case, the Governor's decision is easy to justify.

From a purely fiscal perspective, it costs two-and-a-half times as much to execute a convict as it does to imprison that convict for life, when you take into account the legal processes and the additional strain on our over-burdened justice system. In this light, executions seem to be expensive extravagances.

Further, there is statistical evidence to suggest that capital punishment is administered disproportionately against racial minorities. According to the Death Penalty Focus, racial minorities compose 55% of convicts on Death Row, but are less than 30% of the general population. So, according to the irrefutable statistics, capital punishment has an inherent racial bias. No one can support that.

And most importantly, since our justice system is a human institution, it is capable of error. Anyone who reads the papers has surely read about the reversals of convictions that have come about because of recent advances in DNA analysis. Those are proof of the system's fallibility. And since the system is not (cannot be) perfect, with life and death at stake, the only moral conclusion one can come to is to discontinue it. Clearly, it is better to spare the life of a murderer, no matter how heinous his crimes, than it is to mistakenly take the life of a wrongfully-accused innocent.

Contrary to one typical counter-point, this is not at all about "coddling murderers" or being "soft" on criminals. Spending the rest of one's life in an 8' X 10' cell hardly seems like a reward, no?

In 2006, when Gary Ridgway, the Green River Killer, was sentenced to life in prison in solitary confinement, Judge Richard Jones said this: "As you spend the balance of your life in that tiny cell, surrounded only by your thoughts, please know the women you killed were not throwaways or pieces of candy in a dish placed upon this planet for the sole purpose of satisfying your murderous desires."

As Ridgway faced the families of his victims, he remained in control of himself. That is, until he faced Robert Rule, the father of one of his victims...

Can someone watch this and still think Ridgway got off easy?

Capital punishment is something we should probably end. I support Governor Kitzhaber's decision.