Hello! I'm currently in the process of writing (Or, I should say, recording) my very first SCP. I know antimemes are a somewhat common occurance, and downright cliche by now, but my idea was that a Level 2 Researcher had been exposed to these SCPs in some way, and began to exude some of their properties. Any written text about SCP-4568 will invariably be lost within a set time period, but recordings, video, pictures, etc. remain unaffected, so the SCP will be entirely made through recordings. I only have the description recorded at this time. And no, I don't know how to properly insert MP3s.

This feels a little too reliant on the gimmick, with the story essentially being him asking if he can work and being told "yes". It's not a strong narrative because outside of him being exposed to the thing nothing really happens. An embezzlement scandal is vaguely mentioned, then dropped and not brought up again. I don't think there's enough to make me care about the character either, so I don't like it as a character piece. Beyond "likes working" I've got no idea what Ceballo-Lopez is actually like. As a result, it's difficult to feel sorry for him (If I'm supposed to feel sorry for him)

In terms of the gimmick, I don't think an audio based SCP will work. If I want to hear an SCP I can just go to an SCP reading channel. SCP-3449 has a similar gimmick, with a section of it being purely audio, so it's kind of been done before as well. The whole "it can't be directly written about" thing is done by 2521 as well.

One unarmed guard is to ensure SCP-4568 does not leave his temporary containment without an escort

I think it goes without saying that an SCP is guarded. Also, why unarmed? I know the Foundation trust him, but do they really trust him that much? That seems very lax.

as per usual protocol

What protocol?

Due to SCP-4568’s SCP classification, housing on Site-19 must be provided

Is he no longer staying in the domicile from the previous procedures? Why not?

for fear of his anomalous characteristics affecting other websites and metadata

I don't think the explanation is needed. Containment procedures say how to contain it, not why they're containing it.

Researcher Ceballo-Lopez came under indirect investigation on January 15th, 2018

I think what the anomaly is should be described after the physical description because the justification as to why it's audio should come first.

HARD DRIVE NUMBER REDACTED was opened by Foundation personnel.

I don't like this sentence, it feels kind of awkward. I think you could just say "While the current electronic storage" in the next line.

Any amount of effort to recover this data resulted in no success

"Was unsuccessful", maybe? This reads a little awkward, does it sound better spoken?

remembering it with clarity typical of events within the last three months of the average human

This feels a little excessive. I already thought Dr Lissan wass a regular human with regular human memory, no need to tell me.

As a result, these documents must have contained information in writing prior to the Person of Interest entering the Foundation.

Why are they now a Person of Interest and not "SCP-4568"?

identification, birth certificate

Birth certificates are identification, right? Why specify both?

When given a credit card, he even stated the exact numbers posted on the card, stating he could feel the indentations pressed into the credit card number. Researchers holding the card felt no textures that would indicate the white piece of plastic contained any information.

This whole bit is really awkwardly phrased. It feels overly wordy, maybe just "SCP-4568 claimed to be able to feel the indentations pressed into the credit card number. Other Foundation personnel could not feel any numbers." or something similar.

SCP-4568, under further testing, has proven his antimemetic effect only occurs with specifically written documents.

This is also phrased oddly. It might be a speaking thing, but I don't like the word "specifically", or the "has proven his". Maybe "SCP-4568's anomalous effect only occurs with written documents."

Researcher Love

I already know what researcher Love sounds like, I don't think they need to sign off on their addendums.

O5-▅

Any reason I can't know which O5 did this? Or why it wasn't a council decision?

SCP-4568 reclassified to Safe

Why are they speaking in note form? Why not day "SCP-4568 has been reclassified as Safe"? It feels more professional.

We have put far too much money and training into Researcher Andruw Ceballo-Lopez

Has he gotten more than a normal researcher? Or is this just a general "researcher lives are valuable" statement?

That doesn’t mean we should keep poking him with a stick in his little room until he kills himself.

This is highly unprofessional. I know Stanton has high clearance, but why is he talking like this in official documentation?

Miscellaneous payment

If "Miscellaneous payment" becomes synonymous with "paying Lopez", does it not become a nickname?

Secure. Contain. Protect.

Do Site Command sign off all their addendums with this? It's kind of cliché, I don't think it needs to be here.