The photographer who Jennifer Aniston is suing for taking pictures of her while she was topless in her back yard is defending himself to the press.

He tells ABC News: “She’s the one who went out there topless. I didn’t go looking for it.” Brandt says he was only looking to take photos of Aniston and her new beau Vince Vaughn, and he denies that he was trespassing on her property, as the former Friends star’s lawsuit asserts. He continues: “She has no fences around her backyard. I did not trespass. When I saw her come out topless, I go: ‘Oh, God, this is not what I want, this is not what people want to buy anyway.’ I haven’t sold those pictures anywhere. “You know, they’re suing me and all the publications who are publishing them, and I haven’t sold them anywhere. Sending the topless pictures along with (the other photos) was maybe my mistake. But I wasn’t intending to sell those.”

I’m not saying Jennifer Aniston shouldn’t be outside naked if she doesn’t want people taking naked pictures of her. I’m just saying Jennifer Aniston shouldn’t be outside naked if she doesn’t want people taking naked pictures of her. She knows the paparazzi is up her rear end day and night right now, and since she won’t just come out and admit she and Vaughn are lovers, she’s asking for more paparazzi attention. I don’t know what she’s so worried about, anyway. It’s not like her boobs are shaped like pepperoni pizza slices. They’re really not. So there’s no reason to be embarrassed. Mmm, pizza.

These pictures of Aniston, Vaughn, Cox and some hairdresser are from last month, but I hadn’t seen them anywhere, so up they go.