Hi folks, I am Alan
Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 23rd of April 2009.

Now, people listen,
thousands of people listen to me every night, I get so many emails and I can't
even go through them all never mind answer them. So, for those who want to keep
me going, you know how to do it because on www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com
where multiple thousands of downloads have occurred over the past few years,
multiple, it's incredible the amount of downloads that comes off there. For all
the previous shows I've given out for free, it's up to you to keep me going and
the PayPal buttons are on www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com
website. You can also order the books too, because it is expensive even doing
just what I am doing here. I don't ask for money from any of the stations I'm
on or even the TV programmes either, because then, to an extent you have to go
along in a form of political correctness. You're censored to an extent because
advertising pays you directly in that case and I don't, I don't ask for that.
You, the listeners, keep me going; and that way, I can say what I want pretty
well, about anything. So, as I say, if you want to keep me going, you know how
to do it.

Also, look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts of the talks I've given,
which you can print up and they're written in the various languages of
Europe.

And those who want to
write to me, and people still do a lot of writing, because they don't trust the
Internet. I don't blame them, after all, it's the best data-collection system
ever dreamed up by the boys who control the world. You can contact me [listed above] and that would get to
me, because, many people, after a long-long time, stumble across my address,
they don't look at the Internet, they get disks passed around and they don't
know where to order or how to help me out. Remember: personal cheques are fine
from the US and Canada as well.

You know, it's no fun,
it’s no fun to talk for years about what was to come in this world, the big
plans that were to come and live through them unfolding because, really, there
was no good news. How can there be good news when the world has been under
warfare from a small minority really for a long time, who are so powerful and
have been on the go for so long and have caused so many wars, because war is
simply a method of amalgamation and compromise, altering cultures and creating
empires until you have world empire, that was always their goal and the public
never knew this. However, the big Foundations that really run the world, on
behalf of those who own, monetarily, the world, the big Foundations have
published so many books, especially since the 1880s onwards, about their agenda
and they are never wrong, they tell you what they want to do, they tell you how
they want to do it. They tell you of the scientific type of run society /
managed society that they want to bring in. We're living through the greatest
transformation that's occurred in thousands of years and they say that in their
own words, in their own books. I'll be back with more to tell you where it is
they go from here and it’s not pleasant, it's not nice listening. Back with
more - after these messages.

=== BREAK ===

I'm Alan Watt and this
is Cutting Through The Matrix, going into the future really, the very near
future and even beyond, I suppose, if we’ve got time, which I'm sure we won't;
but, as I say, it's no pleasure reading the books that give you a planned
future. And that's what it is: it's a planned future where its stages or phases
are pulled off, after a certain amount of years for each one. You can find the
techniques in the writings of Cecil Rhodes who was a big front man in himself,
he was chosen for his task and part of his task was to set up the basis for a
multitude of Foundations that would come, all connected together, to bring
about a form of world empire based on a British model or an English, really a
London model that would have two faces. One for the public, which they now call
democracy, and an inner one, of the inner membership, the elite themselves. In
Britain, they just call them The Establishment, they've always been there. And
he wrote about the techniques that they would use, he said they would use
Jesuit-type techniques and the society at the top would be run in secret and by
secret rules and oaths and all the rest of it. This eventually merged with the
Lord Alfred Milner group that was really the big bankers, Milner himself was a
banker; and they formed the Royal Institute of International Affairs, with its
various branches across the British Empire, every country of the British Empire
still has one that runs its country. They also have formed one recently for the
whole of Europe, for the European parliament; and in the US, they call it the
Council on Foreign Relations. It's basically Fabian in its methodology, Fabian
is long-term strategy, very long-term intergenerational strategy and that's
what Carroll Quigley said, who was the historian for this group, the official
authorised historian. And under the guise of democracy and equality etc., they
bring every faction of society, what they see as the conflicting parties
together, by basically bringing in the leaders of all the conflicting sides.
Carroll Quigley said himself, he said they don't mind who is a member of the
Royal Institute of International Affairs or the CFR, he says: They have
dictators, Marxists, Trotskyites, they have Fascists, they have everything on
board; and that is why it's hard to define, it has elements of all of that
within it in itself. However, even prior to it becoming what it is today, the
most powerful global institution, even prior to that, in previous centuries,
the same movement prior to Cecil Rhodes had many names and it's like a
chameleon, because, in different countries, it would take on the shape and the
culture of the country. It rivalled the Roman Catholic Church at one point, for
power, always going down in history as victimised, because they write the
history books, as Carroll Quigley said. Winston Churchill even said of this
group that he was afraid of a group that had so much power that they'd written
the history books of Britain and other countries for over a hundred years; and
all the authorised ones for the schools too, and they still do. Most of the big
novelists over the last 100 years, in fact pretty well all of them, even the
poets, were members of it, because, after all, if you're going to give a
reality or a culture to people, you must decide what it's going to be, so you
put your own people in.

Psychopaths are
incredibly important to them for leadership, because psychopaths, and I don't
even know if people realise that, I think the first study that was done outside
of the lower class type psychopathic element, that the police were used to and
the judicial system were used to, the first main study to see if psychopaths
even existed in other classes was done by Henderson and Gillespie, back in the
1960s; and they were astonished to find the most successful psychopaths were up
in the political classes. Which wasn't really surprising, when you see what it
takes to be a politician: you must have the ability to always lie, without
blushing or blinking, without any trace of guilt. Because, you see, a
psychopath does not feel guilt, no matter the horrific acts they do; and this
has been found it out with the sociopathic type, the kinds that are destructive
personally around them, the rapists, the murderers, they always blame the
victim, no matter how crazy it sounds to the listeners or the jury, they always
blame the victim as wanting this to happen to them, without a blush, because
they must save their ego at all other expense. Tony Blair is a perfect example
of a psychopath.

Britain, again the
leader, the model state remember for the League of Nations and the United
Nations and the World Society, this British system, this Fabian socialist. Tony
Blair has so bankrupted the country with his plans yet he still stands up in front
of millions of people and tells them what a wonderful job he's done. He
justifies the slaughters that were going on across the world in his time in
office and now his successor, another Fabian, is continuing the heritage and
that's psychopathic, that's what a psychopath is. You could accuse them with
the most terrible things, as you pull skeletons out of their closet, but there
wouldn't be a blush, that's standard with these politics, the psychopathic
types.

I've read before from
Political Ponerology, an excellent source in studying the psychopath and we've
got to realise what's really running our lives. We've got to understand this
strange mentality that has no guilt and is determined to have its way, before
the whole world goes under, because these guys intend to vastly reduce the
population. You talk about control freaks; we've never had control freaks in
history as we have today. There's so many of them, all connected in the same
club; and they will use deception, always on the public and never tell them the
truth about anything. And they feel justified; and in their own writings,
they'll tell you this, that they feel justified in doing so, to achieve their
ends; the end justifies the means, whatever it takes, in other words, to get
their objective, it will be done.

This is from the BBC
and here's Tony Blair, now this Tony Blair remember is now trying to tell the
Pope, the Catholic Pope, how to reorganise his church as how he did it, Blair
did it, to the Labour Party. I think once he's finished there, he's going off
to the Dalai Lama, to advise him on how to run Buddhism, because nothing is
beyond the ego of this creature.

The 23rd of April 2009:

Force must be an option - says Blair

Tony Blair has said the case for using military force to topple
oppressive regimes

Now, define
oppressive, look at the state of Britain, it's a police state. It says:

is as strong as it ever was - despite events in Iraq and Afghanistan. He
said intervention was needed to tackle the growing "menace" of
Islamic "extremism" across the Middle East.

You know, it's not
that long ago it was a quiet place; what happened? Do you have the memory to
realise what happened?

But he also stressed the need for engagement with
"progressive" Muslims.

Now, there's the Fabian
talking: get the ones you can buy off on board with you. You see, these guys
have got practice in bringing the leaders on different religions in the past,
down through the centuries, under the guise that we’re all the same. You can
keep your religion, just join our club, same as Freemasonry, you see; this is
where it all comes from. And they say that they're tolerant to everyone, as
long as you're a member and you go along with their agenda. However, they're
the most intolerant group of all when they start dictating their policies to
you; and always under the guise of the greatest toleration, everyone's
welcome.

The former prime minister was speaking on the 10th anniversary of a
speech in Chicago which he set out his belief in an interventionist foreign
policy.

That means you attack
first and do what you have to do, to bring everybody under control - your
control - along the direction that they SHOULD live, you see. You see this is
political correctness to the extreme. These guys believe everything is wrong in
the world; and they want to make it a nice orderly society, as you would make a
god out of clay, you'd make it in your own image, you see. They know what's
best, they're evolved further you see, they're more intelligent than everyone
else; therefore they have the right to tell everyone else how to live. It says:

In April 1999, during the Kosovo conflict, Mr Blair outlined his
criteria for military action abroad in an address to the Chicago Economic
Club.

Did you know there was
a Chicago Economic Club? And what is it? Look and see, see what else it belongs
to.

Returning to the city this week, he told the Chicago Council on Global
Affairs:

Chicago Council on
Global Affairs? Did you vote these guys in? Do you know who they are? They're
all over the place.

"Many, at the time, described the speech as hopelessly idealistic;
dangerous even." And, probably, in the light of events since then, some
would feel vindicated.

Here's what Blair
says:

"As for me, I am older, better educated by the events that shaped
my premiership, but I still believe that those who oppress and brutalise their
citizens are better put out of power than kept in it."

His group have done
their best - and it was planned this way, by the way - to bring the standards
of living for the average British person down to a plummeting low, because
there's to be a plummeting low across the globe now, in this global society
that the Fabians rule.

Back with more - after
these messages.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan
Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, just going over the life of a
psychopath, one of the many psychopaths that are recruited as front men by the
big Fabian socialist system, that, again, is just a managerial class for a
world managerialship, put up there by their masters. The masters being the big
economist bankers, the internationalists that have helped shape the mess we're
in today. It's a shaped mess, it's not an accident; because we have to go into
the next step of the levelling of the planet you see. They've talked about
levelling the planet for such a long-long time, make everyone equally poor and
put themselves at the top and then bring the population of the poor down, while
they and their offspring at the top go on into this Brave New World future. They
might keep some of us around in an altered state of some kind or another, maybe
genetic enhancement, to make us more efficient, but certainly not brighter,
they don't like bright people, they certainly don't like critics or thinkers or
people who can shoot holes through all their nonsense that they feed the
public; because, really, they truly do believe the public must never ever-ever
know the real agenda. Just like the European Union: they set up the idea for
the European Union in World War I, by the Royal Institute of International
Affairs; and wrote about it extensively in their books, their published books,
I have a whole bunch of their old books here. And then, after World War I, they
said they'd need another world war to make it happen, to make everyone get to
their knees and accept a united Europe and a global government; and in 1948,
they set up, across the whole of Europe, with secret treaties in every
government, the bureaucracies, to amalgamate Europe. And then they didn't tell
the public the truth, they kept lying and lying about amalgamation, until it
was actually over and done with; but that's what they can do, they can actually
create a parliament and still deny it and then once it's up and running, at the
right day, they say ‘yes it really does exist’ and they de-classified the
information and it said in it that the public must never know the truth of the
intentions of amalgamation of Europe with a European Parliament, until it was
up and running. That's what the public were told. Nothing's changed, the same
things are going on with the unification of the Americas, because this is just
part two, following on from part one, while they're amalgamating the Far
East.

Getting back to Blair:
the man who doesn't need sleeping pills when he talks about his interventionist
ideas, which are "bold", he calls them. "Bold" - that means
going slaughtering people and forcing them to their knees, wiping out their
agriculture and their food and their factories and their water supplies. It's
very bold; but again, like Rockefeller says, "You can't make an omelette
without breaking eggs" and that's exactly how these guys talk.

[Blair] said it would be wrong to revert to a "more traditional
foreign policy" which he described as "less bold, more cautious; less
idealistic,

So these wars are
"idealistic" wars eh? You didn't know that did you?

more pragmatic, more willing to tolerate the intolerable". But he
said a broader strategy was needed to deal with the threats posed by
extremism.

Do you understand, Margaret
Thatcher, again, you see, there's no right wing and left wing here, she came
out under the "New" Conservatives, progressive Conservatives. In the
US, they call them the NeoCons, it happened at the same time across the world,
because there's only one party running all sides you see. Thatcher came out and
she said "The next war will be on religious fundamentalism, starting - starting
- with the Middle East". Starting: that also means every other country,
including the US. What is "fundamental"? It means the core belief;
you're allowed to have your little traditions and wave your hands in the air
and have tears and hugging each other, but don't believe in the core
foundations at all. That's fundamentalism. So, he goes on to say, Mr.
Blair:

"Back in April 1999, I thought that removal of a despotic regime
was almost sufficient in itself to create the conditions for
progress.

You see this guy / the
Fabians always mention "progress" but they don't tell the public what
they mean.

But this battle cannot so easily be won.

"Because it is based on an ideology and because its roots are deep,
so our strategy for victory

Who is
"our"? Huh? See, he's not talking on behalf of any British public, or
world public, here.

our strategy for victory has to be broader, more comprehensive but also
more sharply defined.

He says:

"...going to be won except over a prolonged period" "In
this sense, it is more akin to fighting revolutionary Communism than a discrete
campaign such as the one which changed the Balkans a decade
ago."

We've had nothing but
constant wars, do you realise that? Do you realise people have no memory of
constant warfare? You know who's behind it? Cecil Rhodes’s bunch started off
the South African Boer War intentionally and blamed the other side for
attacking British, even though the Cecil Rhodes group sent an army in there, to
start the war off; and then, of course, the British Government was only too
happy to come in: 'Oh, we'd better go in and save our own people there'. And
they wrote about it, in their own books, they set off a war. They've set off
many wars, they're doing it right now and we let them get away with it,
because, we believe their B.S. / utter propaganda. The whole world is under
martial law and these guys think it's fantastic; and from their agenda /
strategic point, it is fantastic because they're getting exactly what they
want: the kind of society that's coming into view that they planned a long time
ago. I'm going to go back with more, because it's to show you what is to come
to America; starts in Britain, America follows. Back with more - after this
break.

=== BREAK ===

This is Cutting
Through The Matrix and I am Alan Watt, discussing the Fabians, who run the
current governments, because they always, as Quigley said, have their leaders
at the top of all parties; but they also run the parallel government, those who
have been leaders and high-level bureaucrats and who are now Technocrats, as
they call them, who are given an amazing power to go around the world and alter
things, attend all the meetings and, basically, dictate to the various NGOs and
Foundations that help run the new democracy, as they call it. The old
democracy has gone you see, it's run by NGOs, the front groups that pretend to
demand from governments, on behalf of the people, but no one elects them. The
parallel government that Thatcher said she now belonged to as well, that's one
the one I'm talking about, the one that gets the jobs done, the Kissingers etc.
They have the real power, as Quigley said, they're not answerable to the
general public or to any voter but they're given tremendous money, wealth and
power to implement policies, rules and regulations for this wonderful upcoming
Fabian society, where the masters will tell us what to do and what to think and
punish us like bad little children if we don't go along with them. That's how
simple it is.

Here's the reality of
Britain, this is in the Telegraph and this for the US to listen to because it's
the last place in the world where you can still say things and maybe - maybe -
do something about it, is the US. This is coming to the US, because the present
Fabian who has been plonked in there, parachuted in, to the US, is a front man.
He's signing every UN policy that was shelved and if you do that, you're in the
same boat that's sinking as Britain. The Telegraph UK:

Is Britain the world's first politically correct totalitarian
state?

This is the great
state that Tony Blair's prattling on about and this is from April the 22nd
2009:

Is Britain becoming the world's first "soft totalitarian"
state? That's the question posed by Hal G P Colebatch in The Australian
newspaper. He writes: "Nikolai Bukharin claimed one of the Bolshevik
Revolution's principal tasks was 'to alter people's actual psychology'.

You see, this is the
same stuff, it's the same group actually, because, in Europe, they tried a
different technique by taking over government gradually and bureaucracies
gradually, whereas the Bolshevik / Soviet system was just a fast socialism. It
says:

Britain is not Bolshevik,

Really?

but a campaign to alter people's psychology and create a new Homo
britannicus

See, they actually
said there's a homo sovieticus to be created. They actually had that in the
books. You are just plasticine, you're clay, and the masters can, basically,
reshape you and your mind, through science. So, they want to create a new
British person, it says it:

Is under way without even a fig leaf of disguise. "The Government
is pushing ahead with legislation that will criminalise politically incorrect
jokes, with a maximum punishment of up to seven years' prison. The House of
Lords tried to insert a free-speech amendment,

That's just Britain,
of course, they've never heard of that before.

but Justice Secretary Jack Straw knocked it out."

He's a straw man, you
see, another Fabian.

Colebatch gives several examples, including a 14-year-old girl arrested
for "racism" because she wanted to sit with fellow English-speakers
in class,

That was true, the
rest of them spoke Urdu, she couldn't understand them. So, what do you do? You
charge them when they complain.

a 10-year-old arrested for calling a schoolmate by a racist word, and
the hate crime investigation against Basil Brush for making a joke about
Gypsies. These stories used to be a bit of joke themselves, often involving
over-zealous, humourless young WPCs hassling crazy gay-bashing old
Evangelicals. But the joke's worn thin.

As the author points out, there are just too many cases of people being
arrested for homophobia, racism or other thought crimes for this to be treated
as anything other than state policy.

Well, of course it is
state policy. After all, you're all animals and they're going to make sure that
you all get along, you see, that's the Fabian way; and the masters will make
you all do it, they'll create a new type anyway.

Of course Britain isn't Orwell's Oceania or Bolshevik Russia yet, but it
is a tyranny nonetheless.

No kidding? It's
amazing: it's only taken ten years for the mainstream media to start waking up,
a little bit.

Liberal Democrat MP Evan Harris felt very smug about overturning
Britain's long disused blasphemy laws last years, and was made "Secularist
of the Year", even though Britain hasn't been in any way an Anglican
theocracy since the early Victorian era. This - arresting people for having
unfashionable views, however objectionable - is a real theocracy.

And it truly is, this
is theocracy, it's a priesthood.

If you want to fight for freedom, Dr Harris, fight for the peoples' right
to be racist or sexist or Islamophobic or simply rude. This atheocracy derives
from the incredibly liberal but also incredibly intolerant

That's what I've told
you: you see, under the guise of liberalism, you'll find, when they're in
power, they're the most intolerant of all. It's either their way or the
highway.

anti-discrimination morality that spread through Britain's universities
in the 1970s, 80s and 90s. It became known as "political
correctness", which itself became a tedious cliché because we journalists
overused it. Many people missed the point of PC - it wasn't about the funny
language, which was often absurd but arose partly from a noble attempt to be
polite and not hurt anyone's feelings. The point of political correctness was
that it closed down debate. Political correctness sought - in true Orwellian
fashion - to make contrary ideas utterly verboten.

And it actually has
worked to an extent.

Perfectly legitimate objections to ideas such as total sexual (sorry,
"gender") equality or sexual liberation or whites having the monopoly
of racism were suppressed all over academia, even more so in Big Bad America
than in liberal Europe.

And if debate is closed down in politics and in academia, it is only a
matter of time before it becomes not simply unsayable but illegal.

Well, it is illegal
now, this is the wonderful Britain, where you can't even use humour with your
friends anymore because someone might be in a bad mood and get offended; tough,
tough. However, the comments are really interesting in this wonderful Britain
that's the model state for the world, because, you look through them at the
bottom there, talking about the totalitarian system and everyone knows it, all
the writers and they know it and there's one called 'UK Debt Slave' who
says:

It is indeed the new totalitarian age. There doesn't seem to be any
limit to the persecution of people for non-crimes. And this micromanagement of
peoples' lives goes way beyond political correctness. It is now a punishable
offence to leave the lid on your wheelie bin

That’s a garbage bin.

ajar in some parts of the country. We are constantly spied upon. This
government is even encouraging citizens to spy on each other.

This guy says:

I'm so appalled, I'm actually selling up and leaving before they shut
the door on foreign travel.

See: he sees it coming
too. He says:

These morons are driving the British people on a one way street towards
absolute control and totalitarian dystopia. The British have been the ideal
guinea pigs for these Fabian and Marxist ideals because they are overly
tolerant of overbearing government and easily placated by consumerism and
tittle-tattle.

Meaning the tedious
trivia they give you in the media. So, this guy's off to live in America! The
reason he's given, he says:

Where the very same creeping fascism is also taking root.

He knows that too. He
says:

They'll have a much tougher time imposing such ideas on the America
people who have another advantage, in that they're armed to the
teeth.

This is from the
writers into a major newspaper in the UK. Britain, the model state for the
world because whatever happens there first is followed very quickly now,
generally within weeks, in the United States and Canada and elsewhere; and we
sit back and allow this to happen.

This is another
article from the Telegraph:

Children tracked by Satellite navigation to stop bad behaviour

This is from their
technology page.

Children will be tracked by satellite on public transport and encouraged
to spy on their friends and report bad behaviour, under a pilot scheme by the
Welsh Assembly.

That will be followed
everywhere.

Pupils will use a picture swipe card to clock on and off the bus
allowing parents

Now, it's not for
parents, because the parents won't have these readers, it's for the government
authorities. There's a lie right off the bat you see, so this is a PR piece, to
promote it

to keep a closer check on their child via a website. The project is
being trialled across the six North Wales counties

If it's being
trialled, that's for nationwide.

to tackle anti-social behaviour on school buses.

Now, that comes with
all the things we've talked about before tonight.

Pupils will use a picture swipe card to clock on and off the bus
allowing parents to keep a closer check

Blah, blah,
blah.

It will help deal with a number of issues including truancy,

Truancy? Truancy’s a
major crime now!

drivers reporting and identifying ill-behaved children

Ill-behaved
eh?

and monitoring a child's whereabouts in the event of them going missing
or a bus breakdown.

14 year olds are being
recruited to spy on their fellows and they have a list of what is down as 'bad
behaviour':

Bad speech, bad terminology, bad thoughts,

Wrong
think.

Peter Daniels, transport manager at Denbighshire County Council said:
"The main aims are to support schools,

Oh, support.

drivers, parents and pupils on school buses to improve behaviour and
enable them to understand the consequences of some of the things they do.

This guy will be
getting a back-hander as well, you see money changes hands under the table,
with these characters. I wonder what the company is. This is the world they're
bringing in, you see, this Brave New World, where everyone will be paranoid of
everyone else and we'll be just like the Soviets, staring at the sidewalk as we
walk along, because you don't dare meet the glance of anyone passing by you, in
case they see some odd thought flashing through your eye. Not kidding.

Before I get off this
rant tonight as well, this was on Yahoo, yesterday. Remember, I told you
yesterday, I said you know, for thousands of years, the Fabians learn from
history, they have professors, stacks of professors, they always have them on
board, to tell them how to use the past into the present, what worked before
will work again. Plato said the same thing. Whatever you've made man do in past
ages, if you know the formula to introduce it, it will work just as well again,
formula. They used guilt; you see guilt was the big stick of the churches. 'You
were born in sin, Adam sinned, oh my God everybody sinned’, thousands and
millions of years ago, so that's why you're nothing but scum today. In fact,
there's a way out and we know the way and here's what you have to do: just get
calluses on your knees and throw money in these boxes and obey obey obey'. This
is Fabianism, folks; here they go with the same thing:

Geithner

Ha-ha, I love this
guy!

urges global effort to tamp crisis

April 22nd.

The United States bears "substantial" blame for the woes
besetting the world economy but it will take a global effort to ease those
strains, U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said on Wednesday.

Did you all know you
were all a fault for this? This crash, it was your fault; the crash was all
your fault. I guess when they say the "United States" that means the
collective, the collective society, right? How many of you are related to top
bankers? Because I understood that it was those guys that caused the problem,
but here's reality swap right there. He's no sooner in office and it's all your
fault. And here we go again; I talked about the Chicago Economic Club:

Speaking to the Economic Club of Washington, Geithner said

Check these guys out,
you don't vote for these guys.

it was essential to find a better-balanced model for world growth that
relies less on U.S. consumers as economies bid to climb out of the steepest
downturn in decades.

What he's going to say
here, is to parrot Kissinger and Brzezinski and all the other big boys that
work for the CFR, because, back in the 1930s and the 1940s, the same group,
through the UN, were saying they would have to get the West to stop consuming
so much; see, it's all your consumption that was at fault, you know. All you
guys apparently owned all the factories that just took all the chromium out of
Africa, it was all your fault. He says:

"We must set ourselves on a path so that one country, or group of
countries, does not consume in excess while another set of countries produces
in excess," he said.

This is right from the
CFR's textbook, the levelling of the planet.

Geithner's remarks are part of a concerted campaign by the Obama
administration to push developing countries to stimulate domestic demand and
cut reliance on exports for growth. U.S. President Barack Obama stressed the
same theme at a meeting

Oh, my goodness, I'm
surprised they're all expressing the same theme! A unified front: weapons
of mass destruction baa baa, weapons of mass destruction, here they are, the
same thing you see. They're given terms / slogans to use and every one of these
front men will parrot them to every paper that they have a chance to be
interviewed by.

U.S. President Barack Obama stressed the same theme at a meeting of the
Group of 20 rich and emerging economies in London this month. Geithner will
repeat the message on Friday

To make sure we all
get it, you see.

when he hosts a meeting of G20 officials after a regular gathering of
finance ministers and central bankers from the Group of Seven major industrial
powers.

Well, apparently we're
all at fault for causing this global depression but he's meeting with the
big-big bankers that a month ago / two months ago were at fault for it. I guess
they considered it and decided it was all really our fault.

SPENDING CONTROL COMING

You know what that
means? Prices fixed, wages fixed and so on. Again, the UK was the test bed for
all this.

Geithner stressed that the United States is prepared

You know you're all
prepared?

to incur budget deficits

I'm glad they asked
all of you. Now you know what the world managerial class is all about, because
they dictate down, without a problem. They're not even bothering pretending
they're democratic any more. Do you notice that? Do you notice that? Remember
what Bertrand Russell said: they have to gradually, over generations, condition
the public into the acceptance, without even reasoning it through, that they're
being managed, not governed, managed. So:

the United States is prepared to incur budget deficits now to spur
economic activity but said it would get spending under control once the crisis
ends. "That is very important to do, because the American people and
investors (around the world) need to understand that we will have the will and
the commitment as a country to go back to ... living within our means,"
Geithner said.

With his smug smile: a
beautiful photograph of his smug smile here too, the big grin.

"To get to that point we have to get a recovery in
place."

Now, here we go:

The International Monetary Fund, which with the World Bank holds
semi-annual meetings in Washington this weekend, said on Wednesday the global
economy was likely to shrink 1.3 percent this year in its deepest swoon since
the end of World War Two.

No wonder they're all
grinning. Back with more - after this break.

=== BREAK ===

This is Cutting
Through The Matrix and I'm Alan Watt; and before I go onto the phones - and
this hour, again, is just flashing in - it was announced a couple of days ago
that in Toronto, the police there can confiscate any property they want, if
they suspect there's any kind of crime to do with drugs and that going on. It
doesn't have to go to court or anything else and they split the loot, it's all
sold and everything else. That's it - you don't have to go to court or
anything, just suspicion - cars, houses, everything. That's what they did in the
Soviet Union. Because, again, the Soviet Union was the model for the police
state. That's why they brought the big KGB guys over for the war on terror and
gave them employment in Washington DC. In Britain, when they pull your car off
the road for any little infraction, after two weeks, if you can't pay all the
towing fees and everything else they charge, about $1500, they crush your car,
they crush your car. This is the kinder gentle society.

Now, we'll go to
Toronto and there's Bruce on the line, are you there Bruce? Hello Bruce?

Bruce: Hi Alan. I've
read the material on your site and I've learned a lot, I admire your insight,
you historical depth, it's fantastic; and like you, I live in Ontario. I
thought I'd ask, maybe others are interested; and I'm not expecting a positive
answer, but, given what's coming down and that it's accelerating, can you
imagine that we could move somewhere else, could it be Ecuador, Brazil, any
other place where we might engage in a self-sustaining lifestyle, be able to grow
our own food, even if it's for another ten years? Because, like you, I see
these things are coming down more and more quickly.

Alan: You're right in
that, in fact a lot of people are already moving out to those areas, have been
for the last few years, accelerating now; and that's what they're looking for,
to last out a few more years beyond, as the West goes down, and to be left
fairly alone, basically and have the normal kind of life you expect, where you
make your own decisions until the end. That's all you can really hope for,
because we are under a totalitarian world society and any country even that
tries to pull out will be called a 'rogue nation' by the UN and they'll send
all of their main UN armies into that country. That goes for Canada, the States,
everywhere else too, you know. So, all you can do is to look for those few
countries left where there is still people who haven't been caught up under
total commercialisation and they still have a remnant of culture and
self-sufficiency left. You're quite right with those particular areas.

Bruce: OK, so that
sounds on the right track. With the North American Union being planned, I see
that perhaps being instituted by 2012, so there isn't a lot of time.

Alan: Actually, it's
official, that was even from the free trade negotiations, before the NAFTA
negotiations, the whole thing would be completely amalgamated actually by 2010.
2009 is the second last signature that's to be done this year by the three
Prime Ministers, Canada, Mexico and the US, and then 2010, that's the total
integration, that's the last signatory; that's it.

Bruce: Does that mean
the Amero would be in force once we give up our fiscal authority?

Alan: It really
doesn't matter so much about the type of currency initially, that will follow;
but already our federal bureaucracies are merged, they're merging; and so is
the complete security system, CSIS, CIA, FBI, they're all merged already. It's
just a matter of the final merger, that's all. But thanks for calling and
here’s the music already, my god, we don't have enough time on this show, so
maybe John from Canada and Mike from Wyoming can come back tomorrow, I'll talk
to them then.

From myself and
Hamish, in Ontario, Canada, it's goodnight and may your god or your gods go
with you.