On September 14, 2005, the House of Representatives
suddenly passed 223-199 the federal anti-hate bill, the Local Law Enforcement
Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2005. It was inserted as AMDT.2662 into the
Childrens Safety Act. Despite all odds, the Senate Judiciary stripped the hate
bill S.1145 from the Children's Safety Act on October 20th 2005, thanks in many
parts to the loud voices of many broadcasters and talk radio listeners who
helped reveal the reality and consequences of the hate bill.

Yet like all these draconian, freedom hating pieces of
legislation, there are attempts afoot to quietly attach it to other bills and
get it through on the sly. Senator Edward Kennedy is determined to reattach the
hate bill, unmodified, to The Sex Offenders Registration Act, S.1088. If that
fails, he may attach it to the Streamlined Procedures Act. Kennedy's staffers
have told Reverend Ted Pike, one vigilant exposee of the hate bill, that they
are confident of victory, considering the Senate's 65-to-33 vote in favor of the
hate bill last year.

In light of these facts, let us again go over the details
of the "hate bill" and further expose it for the freedom destroying and
unconstitutional bill that it is.

Firstly, the bill is so dangerous because as ever it hands
over more power to the federal government and effectively brings local law
enforcement agencies under it's control. Allowing a centralized power structure
to determine what is and what isn't "hate speech" or a "hate crime" is akin to
tin-pot dictatorship. It means that there will be a broad overarching definition
of what kind of speech is against the law according to which federally protected
groups become offended by the opinion of someone else.

An example of this could be Christian preaching as counter
protest to gay pride marches. It wouldn't be against the law for gay rights
activists to preach the values they ascribe to, yet Christian activists may be
committing hate crimes by simply reading from the bible. Indeed this has
happened on a local level in Philadelphia, the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai
B'rith, creators of the current anti-hate legislation, enforced hate laws
against 11 Christians on October 10, 2004. Preaching at a gay pride rally.
Possible penalties were up to 47 years in prison and $90,000 fines each. The
case against them was thrown out by a higher court yet if the legislation was
passed into national law maybe they wouldn't have got off so lightly.

Furthermore, the bill is in direct violation of the 14th
Amendment to the US Constitution, which prohibits government from favoring any
particular group.

According to Sec.7(b)(2) of the bill, the U.S. Attorney
General, may pursue hate crimes indictments within states if:

A. the State does not have jurisdiction or does not intend
to exercise jurisdiction. (Prosecuting hate crimes in the way the federal
government wants them to)

B. the verdict or sentence obtained pursuant to
State charges left demonstratively unvindicated the Federal interest in
eradicating bias-motivated violence. (If states
do not obtain the kind of verdict the federal government wishes in a hate crimes
trial)

So really the bill allows the federal government to
intervene and over rule all state and local laws should it wish to. This is
effectively placing the power over many into the hands of the very few. It is
much easier to corrupt and control the very few than the many.

The legislation would also ban alleged discrimination
based on sexual orientation, whether actual or perceived, as well as gender,
which is a code word for transgender, cross-dresser, or transvestite. Homosexual
activist groups want federal legal protections for individuals with serious
gender identity disorders. If the bill ever passed we could see situations
whereby you would be criminally liable if you discriminated against a man who
wished to wear a dress to workor to use a womans restroom because he thinks
hes really a woman.

The bill in this sense also fractures society whilst
claiming to unify it. Many gay rights activists are out to prove that they are
no different to the rest of society, they want to live their lives and be
entitled to the same freedoms that everyone else is. Yet this hate crime bill
singles them out as a minority group. It allows for children as young as
Kindergarten age in the public schools systems to be forced to attend "diversity
workshops" and undertake "GLBT (Gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered)
Studies". In addition to the traditional Prom night, "Gay proms" and the like
are becoming the norm at public schools. This only serves to single out and
distance people of alternative sexual preference and restrict theirs as well as
everyone else's freedoms.

Furthermore, home schooled children often pulled out of
public schools for some of the reasons listed above, are not being allowed to
receive certification if their parents do not teach a curriculum that
incorporates appreciation for "sexual diversity". Lets bypass the argument over
sexual diversity and go straight to the fact that Kindergarten children should
NOT be being taught ANYTHING about sexuality. Who in their right mind would want
to enforce sex education on kids barely out of diapers?

The federal government argues that there is a need for
this extreme legislation because there is currently an "epidemic of hate"
against people of alternative sexual preference. Yet according to FBI "hate
crimes" figures recently released in 2003, of the 11.9 million reported crimes
only 1430 were "bias crimes" against a person's sexual orientation. Of those,
433 were listed as intimidation or simple name calling.

Let us put this more into perspective. The bill directly
violates freedom of religion in this sense as it declares moral disapproval to
be unacceptable. It condemns the religious beliefs not only of Christians, but
also of Jews and Muslims who according to their faiths consider homosexuality
and unorthodox sexual practices to be morally wrong. The federal hate bill
effectively equates such reservations with the racist views of White
supremacists, Nazis and Klansmen. This means a hell of a lot of people are going
to be determined to be "hate criminals".

More generally of those 11.9 million hate crimes, only
7489 were against all categories (race, religion. Gender, sexual orientation,
etc.) covered by the proposed hate bill. This is hardly an "epidemic" that needs
to be stopped by drastically changing the entire system of nationwide law
enforcement.

Of course the bill would also mean the freedom previously
enjoyed by talk radio hosts such as Alex Jones would come under considerable
threat. Take last month for example when Alex, as director of the Texans For
Freedom Group, led a counter demonstration at the Texas United Latino Artists
(TULA) march.

The demonstration was not against TULA per se, many of the
organizers and groups participating in the TULA parade were simply celebrating
their heritage. However, some of the groups participating, like MECHA and La
Raza, are overtly racist and Alex set out to expose this to the media.

Should an overarching definition of "hate crime" be
determined by ADL/federal definition that 'hate' equals bias against
federally-protected groups, then such groups that claim to be celebrating their
heritage may fall into that category. The bill states that a "hate crime" would
be defined by actual or perceived religion, national origin,
gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability.

The MECHA, motto is, Everything for the race, for those
outside the race nothing, and La Raza, means The Race in Spanish. These
groups are no different to the Klu Klux Klan with their overtly racist
ideologies, yet they claim they are defending their national origin and media
still does nothing to expose them for what they are.

Should the hate bill pass then people like Alex Jones
could find themselves arrested under hate crimes laws for protesting against
groups that openly promote hatred but get away with it because they "hate" those
in the majority.

If the bill was to pass at some point we may find
ourselves down the road living in a country where you cannot criticize anything
or anyone the government determines to be in the right. And how will this be
policed? Most probably via the subtle encouragement of tittle-tattling and
spying on your neighbours.

This would be akin to Orwell's ministry of love in 1984
and Big Brother's thought crime law. New generations would grow up to naturally
consider criticism of anything in general wrong and even thinking or considering
something contradictory to be a crime.

In summary: The federal hate bill criminalizes thoughts
and feelings. It directly violates the Constitution. The bill violates freedom
of religion. The bill violates freedom of speech. The bill is not a response to
a "hate crime epidemic" because there isn't a hate crime epidemic. The bill
interferes with local law enforcement and effectively federalizes it. The bill
fractures society whilst claiming to unify it.

PROTEST S.1145 TO ALL 55 REPUBLICAN MEMBERS OF THE SENATE!
These senators are listed at http://www.truthtellers.org Call
toll free 1-888-355-3588 or toll 1-202-225-3121. With only one phone call, you
can be transferred from one office to the other upon your request, calling all
55 in about 20 minutes. Tell them "I want to express my disapproval of the hate
bill S.1145!"

---------------------------------------------

Get Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson's books, ALL Alex's
documentary films, films by other authors, audio interviews and special reports.
Sign up at Prison Planet.tv - CLICK
HERE.

Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.