And Emery, again, I want to thank you so much for finally stepping forward to do this.

Emery Smith: Well, thank you, Dave. It’s been a long time, as you know, around 10 years for me to come out and talk about it.

And I think it’s time for the people to know to add to what you have already been teaching.

But there’s some gaps there, and I want to help you fill those if you have any questions with them.

David: We had talked about this briefing that I got from Pete Peterson that was very recent in this idea that he was following up on what he gave us on a previous episode of “Cosmic Disclosure”.

Emery: Okay.

David: We were talking about the idea that there are these vast carved tunnels underground – smooth, almost glass-like interior – like it’s . . .

Emery: Obsidian. Yeah.

David: Right.

Emery: Melted rock. Yeah.

David: So you know about this?

Emery: Yes, I know.

David: And he said that, in some cases, they follow the Nazca Lines, and that there are these chambers off the sides that look like people were living there, but it appears that whoever was there just took all the stuff out when they left.

So could you just speak to that for a second – that part of it? The idea that somebody might have cleared everything out, and it might not have been us, per se, but maybe it was the beings themselves.

What do we know about why it was so abandoned looking?

Emery: Well, there’s actually a lot of the craft down there, and they’re connected to many other tunnels.

I don’t know what he was debriefed on, but what I was debriefed on is, you know, there’s over, you know, 200 to 300 craft down there, and many beings that are kind of petrified into the walls.

And it is like a lava tube-type of cave system, where it was intentionally melted, it looks like, and frozen in . . . like frozen . . .

David: Right.

Emery: . . . in some moment and some sort of suspended animation, I would say.

David: Well, that is interesting that you said 200 to 300 craft, because this briefing from Pete, he was speculating that there might be as many as possibly 500 down there.

Emery: Oh.

David: So that’s a very similar number.

Emery: Oh, well, just in Mexico alone, in that area is about that, but those go way down south too.

David: Wow!

Emery: So this is a big collective group of scientists, which have now just had to turn it over to the U.S. government.

David: So another one of the things that he said in this briefing that I’ve never shared with anyone, and I’m just going to drop it on camera right now, he said that the latest intel that he’s aware of is that there are evidence of five different epochs on Earth of extraterrestrial colonies that were fairly large and fairly considerable when they happened – that they’re almost all underground.

And he said that of these five eras, some of them go back millions of years, and that they are very different: the type of technology, the type of society, the way that everything looks. It’s all very different.

So I’m wondering if you ever heard about there being like five major, if you will, ages of extraterrestrial colonization of Earth?

Emery: I’ve heard up to five. I’ve kind of known of three, because of artifacts and beings, but that’s just secondhand.

I mean, firsthand that I’ve seen the stuff and read the briefings, and I’ve seen some of the technology and some of the bodies, of course.

But, yeah, that is correct. There must have been at least five different civilizations that, you know . . . We’re talking million year gaps though.

David: Right.

Emery: We’re talking, you know, different times, you know. And I think maybe that might be correlated with the stuff in Egypt and Antarctica, and, you know, ancient Lemuria and Atlantis.

It’s all kind of tied into different time zones, because the symbols and the thing they’re finding, and all the equipment and technology, is completely different, like you said.

So there are a lot of scientists out there they are hiring now to put in like . . . to crack this code, like, what does this mean?

And some of the stuff they can’t operate, of course, because they don’t understand consciousness is just a technology, number one.

Number two, it’s such a higher science that we’re not even . . . we’ve never even learned it, and it’s so beyond us that we wouldn’t be able to understand it if I was an ET talking to you trying to explain it, because it would be beyond your, you know . . . It would be beyond your brain to assimilate that, knowing what you know now.

David: I was particularly fascinated in the previous episode when you talked about the idea that similar ruins as Antarctica were found in a cave in Costa Rica. And I want to throw something at you and see what you say.

One of the insiders told me about a complex that was found underground in Ecuador, and that Neil Armstrong and certain other NASA astronauts were given the ability to go in there.

It’s VERY advanced. It’s VERY amazing, and it’s similar to Antarctica.

And I’ve never found another insider who had a corollary point of data for that particular thing.

Emery: Yes, it seems to have already started its own flora and fauna growing in this . . . There’s a craft that crashed there a very long time ago, and it still had some sort of energy system on.

It must have carried extra bacteria or something because deep down in there it’s actually kind of a very bio-luminescent type feeling, and its atmosphere is a little different than the atmosphere on top.

And it’s NOT very deep under the ground, so you know.

David: Hm!

Emery: But I can tell you that the plant life down there is unlike anything I’ve ever seen on Earth, . . .

David: Wow!

Emery: . . . so that was really astounding. Of course, some of the little insects and other things that were running around were also very different. And this is . . .

David: Wow!

Emery: This place is highly guarded and has a really good security system, but I think it’s going to be brought to the public because of other organizational satellites are now picking up on Inner Earth things just by accident. So it’s going to be hard for them to hide this one.

So he is correct about this . . . Did he call it a cave or . . . ?

David: He just said it was an underground complex.

Emery: Right. It’s an underground complex. But it really was a craft that we think may have crashed there or stayed there at one point, and then they started building around it.

And then, since it was so close to the surface of the Earth, the water . . . and it opened up and runoff went in there and some of the flora and fauna has mixed with this stuff, whatever they brought, or it could be the energy from this craft in there that’s changing all this stuff.

And I can’t got into more detail than just that.

David: Okay. It’s been driving me crazy that he used words like “very amazing”, but then wouldn’t give me any actual detail of what we might see.

So could you give us a little bit about what we might see if, at some point, we get to go in there?

Emery: Yeah, I can, I just hate to use movies as a retrospect.

David: But movies are programmed with information to discredit whistleblowers.

Emery: It would make “Avatar” land look like a small school playground.

David: Wow!

Emery: Everything in there had fluid running through it. The stems of the branches look like it, you know, had fluid running through everything.

David: Wow!

Emery: There was light, you know, like light from everything – all different kinds of shades of light. Light I’ve never seen before.

Not just talking about the colors of the rainbow, but so many amazing colors.

And the plants are the most amazing things, and they’re like conscious, not like our . . . Of course, all plants are conscious, but they are different in that way.

Everything down from the leaves to the soil was sponge. It was soil. The soil was all sponge, like you’re walking on a one-inch foam mattress, I could put it, you know, how you feel that little gushy?

David: Uh-huh.

Emery: And everything is really humid.

And there were little creatures, like little animals, like the size of mice there that were like naked moles, like naked little shrews, running around that were definitely different. They actually had color that was emanating from them, and I don’t know if it was a reflection of light from the light that was in there or if they were emanating light.

I was not there to, you know, talk about that specific thing. I was there on some . . . to do something else. But it was the most fascinating . . . one of the most fascinating things I’ve ever seen here on Earth.

And I do believe there’s a lot of other biospheres that are formed. This one just got cracked open somehow and mixed with a lot of our stuff, and that’s what they were concerned with. Would it leave this area? And it can’t.

The plants they took out of there, and the animals they took out of there, could not survive on the surface of our Earth.

David: Wow!

Emery: So it is its own type of biosphere. And maybe there is an electromagnetic field that’s protecting, you know, the opening in that area from anything, you know, going out or, you know, coming in.

David: Part of what he meant by “very amazing” . . . And I’m really glad to hear these details. It’s making a lot of sense now.

And, I guess, I’ll just say this first that, apparently, this was one of the ways that Neil Armstrong and other astronauts were bribed to stay quiet.

And from what you’re describing, it sounds like it is so incredible that you would want to stay quiet just so you could go there more than once maybe. Or . . .

Emery: Yeah, there was an exchange of favors. There’s no money ever exchanged in these programs. It’s all favors.

David: Hm.

Emery: And if you don’t comply and take the favor, then there’s usually a big problem. Favors such as bringing also the astronauts to Antarctica, as you know.

David: Right. Yes.

Emery: So . . . And all of these other places that are very special in the planet that we haven’t even elaborated on yet, as this one is.

So there’s multiple places like this, actually. They’re in the Earth and around the Earth. It’s just that this one happened to be cracked open like an egg and beautiful things come out.

David: As for technology, when he mentioned “very amazing”, he did imply to some degree that there were things that looked like a really cool spaceship that you would see when you went in there.

So could you elaborate a little on that part as well? Like what’s the interplay between technology spaceship-looking stuff and stuff that looks like the gardens in “Avatar”?

Emery: Well, the craft there are light, and so it’s not something you’d kick the tires on. Ha, ha. And the light is palpable. And it is round and oval, and it is very long and thin, but it’s large. It’s fairly large, what I saw, and I didn’t get to go all the way in, by the way.

I was only in the first 300 yards, so, and that was enough for me to be completely . . . My mouth dropped open.

David: Wow!

Emery: And so this light craft is palpable. So think of light not being blinded like the lights we have right now on us, but a light that glows that you can see it and focus on it without being blinded.

And you can enter it from any place you want on the craft . . .

David: Wow!

Emery: . . . once . . . when you walk up to it and touch it. It’s a biometric-type thing.

David: I mean, that’s very interesting, Emery, because when Pete was on “Cosmic” talking about this craft in Antarctica, he described that it had a sort of diffuse glow.

Emery: That’s right.

David: That everywhere was just light, and no matter where you went, it seemed like the light was always there.

And he also talked about how one of the children that was brought in for these programs figured out that you could speak to the craft, and you could talk to it, and it would mold itself based on what you wanted it to do, and what you told it to do.

It was able to figure out language or thought, or something.

Emery: Absolutely. Yes, definitely. That’s, you know, . . . The whole consciousness is just a technology that we call it here today on Earth.

And the craft are all alive, and you don’t have to . . . To fly a craft, you just have to kind of say, “Go”, and where you want to go. It’s that simple. And . . . Or think where you want to go, and it’ll get you there safely.

And wherever you look in the craft, you can see completely outside the craft. So no matter where you look, it opens up, and you can see very clearly exactly where you’re looking to a very wide angle, . . .

David: Wow!

Emery: . . . including up and down.

David: And can you also get binocular vision, like telescoping vision?

Emery: No. I have not experienced that.

David: Well, one of the things that Pete talked about was that our more advanced fighter jets, the classified ones, have this technology that goes through these nubs in your shoulder blade.

If you feel your shoulder blade, there’s a little dimple in there, and he said there’s a lot of nerves that cross in. And he was part of a team that figured out how to pump signals in through those points that they called ports, and you can actually allow people who are blind to see.

And that on the jets, the jets don’t need windows, but you can look out from your mind’s eye, and it’s the same as vision, except that it also has binocular telescoping function.

Emery: You mean you don’t need heads-up display.

David: Right.

Emery: Not . . . You need your . .

David: It’s in your head.

Emery: You need your, of course, protection.

David: Right.

Emery: Right. Yes, that’s definitely true. It’s been out for a while. It’s kind of old technology.

David: Ha, ha. Old technology?

Emery: Ha, ha. I’m sorry. And that’s . . . They even make toys now, where you hook up something to your finger and think, and the ball floats in the air with a fan or something.CONTINUE READING @ spherebeingalliance.com

_________________________Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at [email protected] with the error, headline and url. Thank you for reading.

Stillness in the Storm DISCLAIMER: All statements, claims, views and opinions that appear anywhere on this site, whether stated as theories or absolute facts, are always presented by Stillness in the Storm as unverified—and should be personally fact checked and discerned by you, the reader. Any opinions or statements herein presented are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, or agreed to by Stillness, those who work with Stillness, or those who read Stillness. Any belief or conclusion gleaned from content on this site is solely the responsibility of you the reader to substantiate. And any actions taken by those who read material on this site is solely the responsibility of the acting party. You are encouraged to think carefully and do your own research. Nothing on this site is meant to be believed without question or personal appraisal.