Subscribe to this blog

Follow by Email

Search This Blog

Yellow vests rise against neoliberal ‘king’ Macron

For
centuries, the “left” hoped popular movements would lead to
changes for the better. Today, many leftists seem terrified of
popular movements for change, convinced “populism” must lead to
“fascism.” But it needn’t be so, says Diana Johnstone.

by
Diana Johnstone

Part
5 - The Weakness of Macron

The
Yellow Vests have made clear to the whole world that Emmanuel Macron
was an artificial product sold to the electorate by an extraordinary
media campaign.

Macron
was the rabbit magically pulled out of a top hat, sponsored by what
must be called the French oligarchy. After catching the eye of
established king-maker Jacques Attali, the young Macron was given a
stint at the Rothschild bank where he could quickly gain a small
fortune, ensuring his class loyalty to his sponsors. Media saturation
and the scare campaign against “fascist” Marine LePen (who
moreover flubbed her major debate) put Macron in office. He had met
his wife when she was teaching his theater class, and now he gets to
play President.

The
mission assigned to him by his sponsors was clear. He must carry
through more vigorously the “reforms” (austerity measures)
already undertaken by previous governments, which had often dawdled
at hastening the decline of the social State.

And
beyond that, Macron was supposed to “save Europe”. Saving Europe
means saving the European Union from the quagmire in which it finds
itself.

This is
why cutting expenses and balancing the budget is his obsession.
Because that’s what he was chosen to do by the oligarchy that
sponsored his candidacy. He was chosen by the financial oligarchy
above all to save the European Union from threatening disintegration
caused by the euro. The treaties establishing the EU and above all
the common currency, the euro, have created an imbalance between
member states that is unsustainable. The irony is that previous
French governments, starting with Mitterrand, are largely responsible
for this state of affairs. In a desperate and technically
ill-examined effort to keep newly unified Germany from becoming the
dominant power in Europe, the French insisted on binding Germany to
France by a common currency. Reluctantly, the Germans agreed to the
euro – but only on German terms. The result is that Germany has
become the unwilling creditor of equally unwilling EU member states,
Italy, Spain, Portugal and of course, ruined Greece. The financial
gap between Germany and its southern neighbors keeps expanding, which
causes ill will on all sides.

Germany
doesn’t want to share economic power with states it considers
irresponsible spendthrifts. So Macron’s mission is to show Germany
that France, despite its flagging economy, is “responsible”, by
squeezing the population in order to pay interest on the debt.
Macron’s idea is that the politicians in Berlin and the bankers in
Frankfurt will be so impressed that they will turn around and say,
well done Emmanuel, we are ready to throw our wealth into a common
pot for the benefit of all 27 Member States. And that is why Macron
will stop at nothing to balance the budget, to make the Germans love
him.

So far,
the Macron magic is not working on the Germans, and it’s driving
his own people into the streets.

Or are
they his own people? Does Macron really care about his run of the
mill compatriots who just work for a living? The consensus is that he
does not.

Macron
is losing the support both of the people in the streets and the
oligarchs who sponsored him. He is not getting the job done.

Macron’s
rabbit-out-of-the hat political ascension leaves him with little
legitimacy, once the glow of glossy magazine covers wears off. With
help from his friends, Macron invented his own party, La République
en Marche, which doesn’t mean much of anything but suggested
action. He peopled his party with individuals from “civil society”,
often medium entrepreneurs with no political experience, plus a few
defectors from either the Socialist or the Republican Parties, to
occupy the most important government posts.

The only
well-known recruit from “civil society” was the popular
environmental activist, Nicolas Hulot, who was given the post of
Minister of Environment, but who abruptly resigned in a radio
announcement last August, citing frustration.

Macron’s
strongest supporter from the political class was Gérard Collomb,
Socialist Mayor of Lyons, who was given the top cabinet post of
Minister of Interior, in charge of national police. But shortly after
Hulot left, Collomb said he was leaving too, to go back to Lyons.
Macron entreated him to stay on, but on October 3, Collomb went ahead
and resigned, with a stunning statement referring to “immense
problems” facing his successor. In the “difficult neighborhoods”
in the suburbs of major cities, he said, the situation is “very
much degraded : it’s the law of the jungle that rules, drug dealers
and radical Islamists have taken the place of the Republic.” Such
suburbs need to be “reconquered”.

After
such a job description, Macron was at a loss to recruit a new
Interior Minister. He groped around and came up with a crony he had
chosen to head his party, ex-Socialist Christophe Castaner. With a
degree in criminology, Castaner’s main experience qualifying him to
head the national police is his close connection, back in his youth
in the 1970s, with a Marseilles Mafioso, apparently due to his
penchant for playing poker and drinking whiskey in illegal dens.

Saturday,
November 17, demonstrators were peaceful, but resented the heavy
teargas attacks. Saturday November 25, things got a big rougher, and
on Saturday December 1st, all hell broke loose. With no leaders and
no service d’ordre (militants assigned to protect the demonstrators
from attacks, provocations and infiltration), it was inevitable that
casseurs (smashers) got into the act and started smashing things,
looting shops and setting fires to trash cans, cars and even
buildings. Not only in Paris, but all over France: from Marseilles to
Brest, from Toulouse to Strasbourg. In the remote town of Puy en
Velay, known for its chapel perched on a rock and its traditional
lace-making, the Prefecture (national government authority) was set
on fire. Tourist arrivals are cancelled and fancy restaurants are
empty and department stores fear for their Christmas windows. The
economic damages are enormous.

And yet,
support for the Yellow Vests remains high, probably because people
are able to distinguish between those grieved citizens and the
vandals who love to wreak destruction for its own sake.

On
Monday, there were suddenly fresh riots in the troubled suburbs that
Collomb warned about as he retreated to Lyons. This was a new front
for the national police, whose representatives let it be known that
all this was getting to be much too much for them to cope with.
Announcing a state of emergency is not likely to solve anything.

Macron
is a bubble that has burst. The legitimacy of his authority is very
much in question. Yet he was elected in 2017 for a five year term,
and his party holds a large majority in parliament that makes his
destitution almost impossible.

So what
next? Despite having been sidelined by Macron’s electoral victory
in 2017, politicians of all hews are trying to recuperate the
movement – but discreetly, because the Gilets Jaunes have made
clear their distrust of all politicians. This is not a movement that
seeks to take power. It simply seeks redress of its grievances. The
government should have listened in the first place, accepted
discussions and compromise. This gets more difficult as time goes on,
but nothing is impossible.

For some
two or three hundred years, people one could call “left” hoped
that popular movements would lead to changes for the better. Today,
many leftists seem terrified of popular movements for change,
convinced “populism” must lead to “fascism”. This attitude is
one of many factors indicating that the changes ahead will not be led
by the left as it exists today. Those who fear change will not be
there to help make it happen. But change is inevitable and it need
not be for the worse.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

globinfo
freexchange Frequently
- if not always - polls set-up by corporate media aim to track public
opinion on a specific issue. The results could be used by the deep
state apparatus in order to justify an action, or, figure out how to
handle a negative trend for the deep state agenda. Of
course, the question could be set-up in a very simplified and
convenient manner, so that the results could be translated
accordingly. Yet, the
results from the following MSNBC
poll on Julian Assange are so devastating for the
deep state planning that leave little room for any misconception and
manipulation. Specifically,
you have two options to answer the following question: “Should
Julian Assange be prosecuted for his involvement in WikiLeaks?” The
first option is to answer that "Yes, he is a criminal." The
second option is to answer that "No, he is a whistleblower
and deserves protection." At the
time we checked out the results, the second answer prevailed
overwhelmingly with 95% (~1…

by
system failure Donald
Trump and his bloodthirsty warhawks are about to break the record of
failed attempted coups against a single country. Concerning Latin
America, the US imperialists were setting the desirable conditions
for their corporate beasts usually by overthrowing governments and
supporting military dictatorships. But
Trump himself has already broken another record. The record of not
keeping his promises to the American people - every one of them. The
'anti-interventionist', 'anti-establishment' Trump, has already
started a war against Venezuela, which so far includes brutal
economic sanctions, sabotage operations, attempted coups. Trump not
only does whatever he can in order to satisfy the US
neocon/neoliberal establishment and the deep state, but especially in
the case of Venezuela, he follows the obsolete CIA playbook to the
letter. So,
after a series of failed orchestrated coups, Trump's warhawks
attempted to start a civil war in Venezuela by mobiliz…

globinfo freexchange
Former US Chief of Staff for Secretary of State, Lawrence Wilkerson, spoke with Sharmini Peries of the Real News about Trump's plans for a potential US military action against Venezuela.

As he pointed out:
Elliott Abrams, Mike Pompeo, John Bolton, and the administration’s approach to Venezuela, is as if they were Panama or they were Honduras. They are not. They’re very professional. That puts them above Argentina, above Chile, whose militaries are quite competent, too.
Mr. Trump ought to be very, very careful about saying he’s going to send marines or soldiers to Venezuela because the Venezuelan military will be unified immediately. It will take to the hills and it will fight as the Vietnamese did during the Vietnam War, and as the Taliban are in Afghanistan right now: to the last marine, to the last soldier.
Putin is a smart man, probably told Trump 'you don’t want to get involved in those jungles. You don’t want to get involved in those mountains. You …

globinfo
freexchange Plenty
of propaganda is manufactured by the US deep state apparatus to push
for the imperialist agenda. Yet, some elements of the propaganda
machine are still unable to realize that independent truth seekers
and real journalists are watching, and therefore, these elements
could be easily exposed. Sloppy
efforts immediately backfire in social media and the Internet. Most
recent sloppy efforts are related to Gaza and Venezuela. As the
Newsweekreported: Senior
2020 Trump campaign adviser Katrina Pierson used a 2015 video
showing a Ukrainian rocket launch alongside comments about this
weekend's deadly attacks between Israel and Gaza militants and a
condemnation of congresswoman Ilhan Omar. Pierson,
who was Donald Trump's 2016 campaign spokesperson and is a
frequent cable news guest, shared the video—which was first
posted online in 2015 and reportedly shows Ukraine launching
dozens of rockets at Russian-backed separatists—on Sunday. Alongsi…

globinfo freexchange
Outside of an Alexandria, Virginia courtroom, Chelsea Manning explained to reporters why she would refuse to testify before a second grand jury investigating Wikileaks' Julian Assange, and as a result, face jail time once again. On May 9, Manning was released from jail because the term of the last grand jury she refused to testify before expired. She was immediately subpoenaed once again—for May 16.
Her following words clearly depict that Chelsea Manning is a person with strong and solid principles and a real hero: I will not cooperate with this or any other grand jury, so it doesn’t matter what it is, or what the case is. I’m just not going to comply or cooperate. Facing jail again, potentially today, doesn’t change my stance. The prosecutors are deliberately placing me in an impossible position: go to jail and face the prospect of being held in contempt again, or, in the alternative, foregoing my principles, the strong positions that I have, that I hold dear…

...
and the liberal centrists must be really pissed offglobinfo
freexchange It was
epic indeed. The moment where the crowd inside the Fox ultra-right
nest enthusiastically cheers in favor of a government-run healthcare
system, could actually be considered a historical moment, thanks to
Bernie Sanders. The
moment clearly depicts and officially marks the end of controlled
audiences in controlled MSM environments. It shows that the well-paid
MSM pundits and their producers are finding increasingly difficult to
set up the scene according to the desirable agenda. Therefore,
audience reactions can't be directed, or predicted in many cases by
the MSM 'experts'. The
shock for the MSM tools was inevitable. It shows that they are now
completely detached from the ordinary people and their problems. But the
whole thing highlighted something even more fundamental. It was another
loud evidence for the fact that the BS neoliberal narratives don't
work anymore. And even
more remarkably, th…

As we wrote recently, the moment where the crowd inside the Fox ultra-right nest enthusiastically cheers in favor of a government-run healthcare system, could actually be considered a historical moment, thanks to Bernie Sanders.

The moment clearly depicts and officially marks the end of controlled audiences in controlled MSM environments. It shows that the well-paid MSM pundits and their producers are finding increasingly difficult to set up the scene according to the desirable agenda. Therefore, audience reactions can't be directed, or predicted in many cases by the MSM 'experts'.
Now, here is an example showing a successful set up through a controlled audience. It took place inside CNN and there is plenty of evidence that was indeed carefully set up. In the following video, Mike Figueredo of the Humanist Report felt optimistic, but also quite frustrated at the same time. Figueredo's reaction …

The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) has begun responding to queries by the press about a leaked document which contradicts official OPCW findings on an alleged chemical weapons attack last year in Douma, Syria. The prepared statement they’ve been using in response to these queries confirms the authenticity of the document.
To recap, a few days ago the Working Group on Syria, Propaganda and Media (WGSPM) published a document signed by a man named Ian Henderson, whose name is seen listed in expert leadership positions on OPCW documents from as far back as 1998 and as recently as 2018. It’s unknown who leaked the document and what other media organizations they may have tried to send it to. The report picks apart the extremely shaky physics and narratives of the official OPCW analysis on the gas cylinders allegedly dropped from Syrian government aircraft in the Douma attack, and concludes that “The dimensions, characteristics and appearance of the cylinders, a…

In this episode of RT's Going Underground, former MP and author of A Very British Coup and The Friends of Harry Perkins, Chris Mullin, spoke about the history of MI5 and MI6 meddling in UK politics against Labour Party leaders. He also estimated whether a British coup is underway against Jeremy Corbyn.
The story of A Very British Coup was set in the 1980s when there was speculation about the possibility of a government led by someone like Tony Benn and the establishment conspired to bring it down. The establishment in this case being a sort of mixture of the security and intelligence services, the media barons, with a little help from the Americans.
Tony Benn looked likely to become deputy leader of the Labour Party which at the time was strongly challenging the government of Margaret Thatcher in the opinion polls. Persistent rumours circulated over the years about attempts by members of the British security services, and other wings of the British Establish…

With
Juan Guaidó’s parallel government attempting to take power with
the backing of the U.S., it is telling that the top political donors
of those in the U.S. most fervently pushing regime change in
Venezuela have close ties to Monsanto and major financial stakes in
Bayer.by
Whitney Webb Part
4 - Why is a top to Marco Rubio increasing his stake in Bayer while
others flee? Yet, it
is AEI’s top individual donor noted in the accidental “schedule
of contributors” disclosure who is most telling about the private
biotech interests guiding the Trump administration’s Venezuela
policy. Paul Singer, the controversial billionaire hedge fund
manager, has long been a major donor to neoconservative and Zionist
causes — helping fund the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI), the
successor to the Project for a New American Century (PNAC); and the
neoconservative and islamophobic Foundation for the Defense of
Democracies (FDD), in addition to the AEI. Singer
is notably one of the top political donors to Senat…