I'm assuming that with the MVTM, you're asking for gross not net point totals, right? Also, anyone have any idea what is good? I'm not going to bother calculating this for our team if there are players with like 100 or more gross.

agentcom wrote:I'm assuming that with the MVTM, you're asking for gross not net point totals, right? Also, anyone have any idea what is good? I'm not going to bother calculating this for our team if there are players with like 100 or more gross.

Gross, as in all the point you won for the team, except forfeits. Points you lost don't come into it.

When you say 'points' do you mean, e.g, 4pts for a quads win (not 1pt, as 4 players in a quad won 1pt each)?

And is the calculation going to be based on gross points won, not nett? So the player who joined the max 6 games per round (and played 84 games in total) and won 43 lost 41 will have a better chance of winning MVP/MVTM than the player who joined the minimum number required to qualify (50%, i.e. 42 games) and won them all? Doesn't seem to be the fairest method if this is the case.

Chariot of Fire wrote:When you say 'points' do you mean, e.g, 4pts for a quads win (not 1pt, as 4 players in a quad won 1pt each)?

And is the calculation going to be based on gross points won, not nett? So the player who joined the max 6 games per round (and played 84 games in total) and won 43 lost 41 will have a better chance of winning MVP/MVTM than the player who joined the minimum number required to qualify (50%, i.e. 42 games) and won them all? Doesn't seem to be the fairest method if this is the case.

the player who joined 50% games and won them all will win MVP award, as he has the best winning percentage. however, the other player who payed a lot but didn't win a lot will get the MVTM award.

Chariot of Fire wrote:When you say 'points' do you mean, e.g, 4pts for a quads win (not 1pt, as 4 players in a quad won 1pt each)?

And is the calculation going to be based on gross points won, not nett? So the player who joined the max 6 games per round (and played 84 games in total) and won 43 lost 41 will have a better chance of winning MVP/MVTM than the player who joined the minimum number required to qualify (50%, i.e. 42 games) and won them all? Doesn't seem to be the fairest method if this is the case.

the player who joined 50% games and won them all will win MVP award, as he has the best winning percentage. however, the other player who payed a lot but didn't win a lot will get the MVTM award.

How do you know this? I don't believe this to be true. Look at Lindax's last post:

Gross, as in all the points you won for the team, except forfeits. Points you lost don't come into it.

Chariot of Fire wrote:When you say 'points' do you mean, e.g, 4pts for a quads win (not 1pt, as 4 players in a quad won 1pt each)?

And is the calculation going to be based on gross points won, not nett? So the player who joined the max 6 games per round (and played 84 games in total) and won 43 lost 41 will have a better chance of winning MVP/MVTM than the player who joined the minimum number required to qualify (50%, i.e. 42 games) and won them all? Doesn't seem to be the fairest method if this is the case.

the player who joined 50% games and won them all will win MVP award, as he has the best winning percentage. however, the other player who payed a lot but didn't win a lot will get the MVTM award.

How do you know this? I don't believe this to be true. Look at Lindax's last post:

Gross, as in all the points you won for the team, except forfeits. Points you lost don't come into it.

I read it in the first post of the tournament there are explained difference between the 2 awards

Chariot of Fire wrote:When you say 'points' do you mean, e.g, 4pts for a quads win (not 1pt, as 4 players in a quad won 1pt each)?

And is the calculation going to be based on gross points won, not nett? So the player who joined the max 6 games per round (and played 84 games in total) and won 43 lost 41 will have a better chance of winning MVP/MVTM than the player who joined the minimum number required to qualify (50%, i.e. 42 games) and won them all? Doesn't seem to be the fairest method if this is the case.

the player who joined 50% games and won them all will win MVP award, as he has the best winning percentage. however, the other player who payed a lot but didn't win a lot will get the MVTM award.

How do you know this? I don't believe this to be true. Look at Lindax's last post:

Gross, as in all the points you won for the team, except forfeits. Points you lost don't come into it.

I read it in the first post of the tournament there are explained difference between the 2 awards

Can you quote from the first post of the tournament where it shows the calculation that will be used? You have said "Best winning percentage" I would like to know where it says that.

Chariot of Fire wrote:Can you quote from the first post of the tournament where it shows the calculation that will be used? You have said "Best winning percentage" I would like to know where it says that.

josko.ri wrote:I think Master Fenrir will be MVTM by quick looking. can he post his total score, so it can be merit for others. if someone is found to have more score than him, then he/she may post.

I just got done compiling the stats for my team. I have three active games, but if those finish as I expect they will, my record will be 40 wins, 22 losses. I have 110 total points thus far, likely to finish with 114. For CoF's benefit, it's a +56 point differential. I wasn't demanding game slots, but we only had HardAttack for the first 4 rounds and I had to compensate for being a man down for the rest of the tournament. I asked everybody on my team which games they wanted, and filled up the rest only after they were first assigned to the games they said they wanted. You can ask them.

So Fen looks like being the front runner for MVTM if it's solely based on overall points won (110pts so far). MVP could be me (yay!) based on Win %, though I'm not familiar with all the others' scores and who else might be in the running.

So Fen looks like being the front runner for MVTM if it's solely based on overall points won (110pts so far). MVP could be me (yay!) based on Win %, though I'm not familiar with all the others' scores and who else might be in the running.

Glad you guys finally figured out the difference between MVP and MVTM!

Before you all start awarding yourself medals, please make sure you read ALL requirements, including this one:

The player must have: Followed the tournament rules and Conquer Club rules and/or guidelines for the duration of this tournament.

Thanks Si. Not making the results official yet, there are still a couple of games ongoing.

Happy with my team. We always ended with the last 4, now we're 7th with the same amount of wins as number 6, they have only 4 points more than us. And we're only 1 win behind your team Si! Well done team!

That game has no bearing on the final standings anymore. As a matter of fact, there is only one other game still ongoing now, which also has no effect on the final standings. So, I'll publish them today or tomorrow.