Jerone Corsi, Ph. D. is about to drop another bombshell, casting further doubt on the stories of President Obama's birth.

Dr. Corsi, whose doctorate is from Harvard, is an excellent researcher and investigative journalist. He was the driving force behind the Swift Boat veterans telling the truth about War Phony John Kerry. He is also the author of "Obamanation."

In his latest research, to be splashed on WND early next week, Dr. Corsi will reveal that he has documentary evidence that the mother of Barack Obama Jr., Ms Stanley A. Durham-Soetoro, began evening classes at the University of Washington in Seattle on August 19, 1961. This is just 15 days after she supposedly gave birth to President Obama in Hawaii.

We are expected to believe that in just15 days, she gave birth, stayed in the hospital for a few days, them packed her things and left her house in Hawaii, moved to Seattle, got established there, registered for, then began classed in Seattle, all the while caring for her newborn.

The new evidence also destroys another Obama legend-lie. According to the Presidents autobiography, Obama Sr. and Durhan-Soetoro were supposedly deeply in love and made a happy home together in Hawaii, complete with their baby, until Obama Sr. had to move to Boston to attend Harvard and could not afford take Stanley and baby Barack with him.

According to Dr. Corsis new written evidence, Durham-Soetoro was in college classes, thousands of miles away from Hawaii and did not return to the islands until long Obama Sr. left for Harvard.

Dr. Corsi also reveals that a Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth requires no proof of any kind and could simply be issued on the sworn statement of one parent.

All of this simply adds to the fast growing uncertainty and suspicion over Obamas supposed birth stories. Is August 4, 1961, his real birth date? Where was he really born? When he traveled to the Middle East in the 1990s, he did not have a US passport. What country issued him a passport, and why? Why wont he release the one document that would answer all the questions?

This would mean EVERY action as president would be illegal. All the money lent out would have to be considered a gift as it was loaned under false pretenses, his SCOTUS appointment would be nullified and any bill he signed would have to be reconsidered.

The powers of the Federal government must be severely restricted by the states. Return all political power to the states. Strip all executive and legislative power from the federal government and have a Congress of our elected state governors serve as a legislature that directs the federal administration in its ministerial duties. Or,... kiss our collective freedoms goodbye!

6
posted on 08/08/2009 9:24:46 PM PDT
by April Lexington
(Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)

Not really. First this author got the year wrong. Second are we supposed to believe that in 15 days Miss Dunham instead traveled several thousand more miles from Africa to Seattle and that makes it plausible?

This would mean EVERY action as president would be illegal. All the money lent out would have to be considered a gift as it was loaned under false pretenses, his SCOTUS appointment would be nullified and any bill he signed would have to be reconsidered

##########

The thought of this makes my mouth water! From the day he started his apology tour, I thought just wait! Every contract, treaty, promise, or the like to any other country will become null & void if he is found to be an imposter! Maybe we can get the money back from the spendulous package!

Does this mean that the Senate/House can be held responsible for not vetting the Potus properly, & just accepting him like they did?

Is the mother's name being wrong--is that a typo, too? These two major mistakes make the story more of a problem than an asset. If I were you, I'd ask the mod to remove this entire thread, lest it be used against us.

I think Obama’s hiding his birth certificate for a reason, but I’m not sure if this bit of research - even if it holds up - leads to any conclusions.

If Durham is in Seattle taking classes 15 days after giving birth to the Marxist 0ne, then she’s in Seattle taking classes on that date, no matter where the birth of the nitwit took place.

Yes, it pokes holes in the other aspects of 0bama’s bogus bio, but in ways that don’t reflect on eligibility. Yes, it would be easier if she didn’t have to fly across the Pacific with a week-old baby, and such flying usually isn’t recommended, but I’m sure it was done then and still is.

I just want the jerk to present his birth certificate just like the rest of us chumps have to when the law calls for it as proof of status for employment. The fact he won’t show it is enough grounds for him to be cleared out - even if, afterwards, he’s show to be a full-fledged NBC.

Simply put, zer0 refuses to comply with the U.S. Constitution, no matter his birth history.

And Barack traveled to Indonesia, Pakistan, and India during the 1980s - not the 1990s.

Many people here have known that Stanley Ann has six months missing in 1961 - from March 1961 to August 1961 after which she shows up to visit a friend on Mercer Island in the Puget Sound, and then attends the University of Washington at Seattle for two terms.

My speculation last year was that she had her baby in Vancouver, BC, Canada. To me that is still a viable theory.

I have to say the basic story, that it would be nearly impossible to give birth in Hawaii and be going to class in Seattle 15 days later, is simply untrue. Some people are very organized. When I got into IT back in 1980 I had an instructor who graduated from college, got married, moved, and started her new job all in the same week. Better her than me!

Right On Norman: the argument that traveling from Hawaii
to Seattle with a newborn within 15 days of birth in an age where there was regular DC-8 jet service on the route is a practical impossibility totally distorts reality.

It makes the Corsi/birthers look desperate: like they are grasping at straws in the wind. Personally I believe that Obama is hiding something about his birth and education...but this is a ridiculous point upon which to try and base any realistic argument.

47
posted on 08/08/2009 9:37:40 PM PDT
by HardStarboard
("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule - Mencken knew Obama)

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.