I suppose that there is a constitutional argument against what Cuomo has done. The feds are allowed to regulate interstate commerce, not the states. Imagine of the offensive product in question was refined sugar, and the governor of NY said that any banks in NY that did business with ConAgra was going to be audited by state regulators.
Put another way, if gun manufacturers in Kentucky or New Hampshire were dependent on NY banks for capital, and NY decided to persecute those banks because the governor of NY has a problem with guns, the only resort is to the feds. It is a violation of federalist principles for NY government to attack business in another state.

MP
Since the Fed controls the nation’s money supply and since U.S. currency can be used to “pay all debts, public and private”, I guess one could argue that the states can’t engage in practices like NY is doing.

Cuomo needs to have issues and topics like this in order to avoid having to answer for why many of those around him are convicted of crimes, and yet he does nothing to address the systemic corruption all around him.

Or is Cuomo using this precisely to avoid the question of political corruption all around him, Scott? It reminds me of all those times that a scandal would break in the Obama years, but amazingly a new bright shiny object would come up just as the first one was getting legs. Shocking coincidence, that.