Bitcoin is No Longer an Uncorrelated Asset – Hacker Noon

Cryptocurrencies have been promoted as an uncorrelated asset class that should be owned to offset potential dips in traditional investment buckets. So far, the lack of correlation has been proven by showing Bitcoin versus equities and fixed income, as well as gold, real estate, and other commodities. Though the analysis is technically true, the analysis is faulty.Bitcoin has only existed since 2009, when global markets bottomed and began a new cycle; a bull market which has lasted for over nine years. Further, Bitcoin is the only asset in this asset class with enough data to begin to measure. And the data that is measurable is for an asset that today has a market cap of only $100B and around $3B of daily volume (best guess, since much of the volume is OTC). Just 18 months ago, the market cap was only $15B with $200mm of daily volume. This does not have enough statistical significance to measure against traditional investment pools. As for the entire cryptocurrency market, it only has a $250B market cap. Within this asset class is a very disparate group of digital assets, ranging from digital currencies, to network gas, to utility tokens (no different than reward points), to asset backed tokens, and even tokens representing VC ownership.​

I have always argued that Bitcoin and other digital assets would eventually become more correlated to traditional markets. Just three things need to be present:

Growth in market cap and liquidity

Retail investor adoption

Actual use cases for utility tokens

In the last year alone, all three have become apparent. Subsequently, correlations are starting to become apparent.

As can be seen in the chart below, most analysts are only comparing Bitcoin and other digital assets to US stocks, bonds, and gold.

Chart courtesy of Sifr Data

However, there are other markets that show much higher correlations to Bitcoin. South Korea and China were both early adopters of digital assets. A strong correlation between South Korea’s KOSPI and Bitcoin began to emerge in 2016, and shortly thereafter followed by a correlation between the Shanghai Composite Index (SSE). The correlation held with the KOSPI throughout 2017 as Korean markets outperformed most global equity markets. The risk on trade in South Korea, along with other other developed markets, contributed to the strength of the digital asset market. If you look at Bitcoin compared to the SSE, the growing correlation emerged in 2016 and grew stronger through June 30, 2018. The 2018 YTD relationship between SSE markets and Bitcoin was 72% correlated, as the poorly performing Chinese economy created a risk off trade in both local equities and digital assets.

The overall relationship between BTC and Chinese markets are possibly linked due to the early adoption of cryptocurrencies in China, and the observed trend of diversification out of Yuan into BTC due to limited ability to purchase USD. Most importantly, a large portion of BTC is earned in China due to the dominance of mining operations in the country, contributing to an outsized volume of Bitcoin trading in China.

Chinese Markets and Effect on Bitcoin

The Shanghai Composite Index is the worst performing country index for the first half of 2018, mostly due to tensions around US/China trade policies. There is uncertainty around further escalation of tariffs between the two countries, which could push the index lower, or potentially hold markets at a bottom. Perceived dovish statements from the PBOC after their June 28th meeting has helped to quell markets, and pushed the Shanghai Index up 2% on June 29th. Crypto markets received support at the same time, with a 5–10% move higher that began on June 29th and continued through July 2nd.

A decade of low interest rates for most developed countries have had a negative impact on emerging markets, which have already seen inflation and currency swings, particularly in commodity-producing countries. China’s inflation rate has held steady and currently around 2%, despite other emerging markets volatility, such as Brazil, which experienced 9% inflation in both 2015 and 2016 before settling to an annualized rate of 3.5% for the last 18 months.

Given that China is already in bear market territory, along with the potential of rising interest rates in the US, further trade tensions, and risk of global inflation, it is possible for China to experience a further pullback in domestic equities. These conditions, if the correlation holds, could be an obstacle for Bitcoin and the digital currency market to overcome before re-entering bull territory.

Disclaimer: This commentary is provided as general information only and is in no way intended as investment advice, investment research, a research report or a recommendation. Any decision to invest or take any other action with respect to the securities discussed in this commentary may involve risks not discussed herein and such decisions should not be based solely on the information contained in this document.

Statements in this communication may include forward-looking information and/or may be based on various assumptions. The forward-looking statements and other views or opinions expressed herein are made as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated and there is no guarantee that any particular outcome will come to pass. The statements made herein are subject to change at any time. Arca Funds disclaims any obligation to update or revise any statements or views expressed herein.

In considering any performance information included in this commentary, it should be noted that past performance is not a guarantee of future results and there can be no assurance that future results will be realized. Some or all of the information provided herein may be or be based on statements of opinion. In addition, certain information provided herein may be based on third-party sources, which information, although believed to be accurate, has not been independently verified. Arca Funds and/or certain of its affiliates and/or clients hold and may, in the future, hold a financial interest in securities that are the same as or substantially similar to the securities discussed in this commentary. No claims are made as to the profitability of such financial interests, now, in the past or in the future and Arca Funds and/or its clients may sell such financial interests at any time. The information provided herein is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has not been reviewed or approved by any regulatory authority and has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances or objectives of persons who may receive it. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.