Here is an article that Carlos Cortiglia recently wrote for the London BNP blog. Claudia Dalgleish put it up on there having found it suitible:

Quote:
Monday, 7 November 2011
Ethno Nationalism and Political Irrelevance

If you get caught up in the whirlwinds of the past, you might end up fighting the Battle of Trafalgar all over again and this is a lesson that many in the Nationalist Movement would be well advised to learn as soon as possible.
In the 1940s, Britain defeated an Ethno-Nationalist regime that had occupied much of continental Europe but was pretty close to becoming an occupied country.
In the end, victory against an Ethno-Nationalist came at a price and as a direct consequence of World War Two the British Empire collapsed and the colonisation of Europe by its former colonies begun.
Before World War Two, and despite the losses of World War One, Western Europe was still the World’s powerhouse. Thanks to Adolf Hitler, European power was destroyed and the destruction of Europe gave birth to bi-polarity with centres of power based outside Western Europe.
For each of the former Powers, there were similar realities. Germany imported massive numbers of Turks, France received a huge influx from Africa and the Middle East and Britain received vast numbers of immigrants from the Caribbean, Africa and the Indian Subcontinent.
So we can fairly say that today’s demographic crisis in Europe was created by Adolf Hitler and his regime. Paradoxically, decades later, many in the Nationalist movement ended up idolizing the one regime that destroyed Europe.
For centuries, Europe had been kept ‘in control’ thanks to what we could call ‘Balance of Power’, an equilibrium that England managed to secure with diplomacy supported by military power. World War Two was the nail in the coffin of ‘Balance of Power’ and when ‘Balance of Power’ disappeared relative peace could only be secured by external Powers over which European countries had no control and European countries became colonies either of the United States of America or of the Soviet Union.
NATO and later on the European Union were not so much defensive elements against external aggression but elements used to try and restore ‘Balance of Power’ in Europe. This became very much an integral part of European psychology. Chancellor Angela Merkel said at a recent meeting of the Bundestag that the choice was between the Euro and War in Europe.
No wonder then that many in today’s Britain, the vast majority of the population of European stock, see Ethno-Nationalism with suspicion and in many cases with outright hostility. The Days of Empire that many cherish were not about Ethno-Nationalism. The Sirs and Dames, the OBEs and the CBEs are remnants of a non-ethno-nationalist Imperial Britain that coincided with British economic, cultural and social prosperity.
Present financial difficulties in Europe have created enormous uncertainties, many across Europe consider that their national identity is under threat and this is reinforced by demographics and by political correctness.
By refusing to take stock of the concerns of local populations and by implementing the wrong kind of policies that tend to discriminate against local populations, the ruling elites are exacerbating the problem and fuelling rising tensions.
The vast majority of the population in Britain is not driven by Ethno-Nationalism and, as I expressed it at a local British National Party meeting in Southeast London, ‘they don’t want to be saved’. Most people care about economics, employment, housing, health, education, transport, safety in the streets and this is something shared across racial, cultural, religious, political and financial boundaries.
You don’t win elections and you don’t represent the Electorate by promoting a product that few people want. Thanks to Ethno-Nationalism, the so called mainstream political parties and their acolytes get away with murder by making promises that they don’t want or they cannot deliver. Britain needs a political party that is able and willing to deliver at a time when faith in the political system is at an all-time low-ebb.
The choices are very clear: we can continue living in the fringes of British politics and remain an irrelevant political oddity or we can adopt the kind of political pragmatism that can offer real solutions. If we are unable or unwilling to face the challenges of the real world, we don’t deserve to be called a political party.
The British National Party was very much instrumental in the investigations carried out during the so called Parliamentary Expenses Scandal. We dealt with facts and evidence, we performed a public service and we felt good about ourselves because we behaved like a true political party.
When we don’t busy ourselves with ideological irrelevance, when we commit ourselves to real politics, we can be extremely effective. This is the challenge for 2011, for 2012 and for many years to come.

If we offer solutions that most people in Britain can welcome as rational and desirable, we will be a truly British National Party.
Dalgliesh was forced to take it down after many complaints by outraged BNP members. It can still be found here though:

Lots of confusion around these days. For instance R Edmonds has not supposed to have joined the NF yet here on this forum is a report from him allegedly. Then other nationalists are attacked. This is a WN forum but I suspect some of it is stirring at least. Not a lot to be fair. Best to concentrate on what we can do to aid other nationalists. Not jumping onto the bandwagon against anyone who may help a bit. Promote your own don't stop others doing it their way.

Lots of confusion around these days. For instance R Edmonds has not supposed to have joined the NF yet here on this forum is a report from him allegedly. Then other nationalists are attacked. This is a WN forum but I suspect some of it is stirring at least. Not a lot to be fair. Best to concentrate on what we can do to aid other nationalists. Not jumping onto the bandwagon against anyone who may help a bit. Promote your own don't stop others doing it their way.

Are you suggesting that British Nationalists should sit back and allow Claudia Dalgleish, Steve Squire (real name Steven Mendoza), and Carlos Cortiglia, all foreigners, to pervert the policies, demographic make up and undermine and destroy the very ideals that the BNP was founded upon and that the vast majority of its members still stand by?

Sorry if I sound totally out of touch but is the author of "Ethno Nationalism and Political Irrelevance" really a member of a Nationalist party?

Perhaps I am missing something or else I am so far away from what is being preached as Nationalism.

Or perhaps it is a wind-up and I am the fool who does not get it.

I am bewildered are you sure it is not the copy of part of a speech made by a person who does not understand the word Nationalism?

I am quite willing to accept I have got things totally wrong, would some of you please put me right or up to date.

Sure I am one of the first to say don't preach hatred, but I will be one of the last to say don't preach Nationalism.

The author of that despicable article is Carlos Cortiglia, quite likely a jew.
He writes for the Jewish chronicle and is a confirmed zionist.
When asked several times if he was a he refused to answer.
He is not a nationalist and is not british. He is from Uruguay and apparently fought against Britain for Argentina in the Falklands war.

He beleives that immigrants should have as much rights in Britain as indigenous people, he himself is an immigrant of course.
Despite this, he was chosen as the BNP candidate in next years mayor of London elections.
There was a local man, a white Londoner,who has served the nationalist cause for years, and was prepared to stand as the candidate.
The British man was overlooked, in favour of standing this anti nationalist immigrant.

The man responsible for this was Steve Squire (real name Mendoza).
"Squire" is the London organiser and the South East regional organiser.
He and his girlfriend, south African ex glamour model and reported drug addict Claudia Dalgleish have made it their buisness to liberalise the BNP, turn it into a civic nationalist abomination and bring in as many blacks, chinese, asians and muslims as possible.
Any one who has objected to what they are doing, Dalgleish has called a Nazi or a racist.

Squire and Dalgleish are supposedto be quite well off, and Squire has recently donated 26 grand to the bnp and so has been given a promotion, and the candidacy for the GLA. He and his girlfreind Claudia have also been able to get away with their disgracefull disruptive and anti nationalist shenanigans.

There is an interesting thread on VNN called "London BNP" that has a lot of information about the goings on in London.

I wish that someone would do the decent thing and bury the BNP, let's have done with the bloody thing.

The sight of all these maggots crawling over the body is too much to stand.

The BNP may be in its death throws but it is still alive, and there are many in the party that will fight till the end to preserve the nationalist sentiments that John Tyndall founded it on.
We can still save it if all true nationalists use their heads and stand by their principles.

If the chap who wrote this is a British Nationalist, I'm a head in Idi Amin's fridge.

You know what's really surprising about such an article, coming as it does from the "political pragmatism" (Griffinista) wing of the Nationalist movement? It didn't mention the words "diversity", "difference" and "cohesion" once.

Check out what the bright and shiny, ever-so PC, pragmatic nu-Nationalism wants us ethno-Nationalists to cohere with here:

As for Ms Merkel and "the choice was between the Euro and War in Europe", how come Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Ireland, Austria, Belgium, the Netherlands, Portugal, Cyprus, Estonia, Finland, Greece, Luxembourg, Malta, Slovakia and Slovenia haven't delared war on us and, for that matter, Denmark, Sweden, Hungary, Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, the Czech Republic, Romania and Bulgaria, who are EU members but do not utilise Ms Merkel's lovely, fluffy currency? Why haven't they declared war on Switzerland, Norway and Iceland or the European bits of Russia which don't use it either?

I reckon the former Commie and the writer of this article are trying to worry the sheeple into going along with their one-world-run-by-us-forever b*llocks. Ah well, as the very few sheeple to be found in British Nationalism voted for Griffin in the last leadership election, let's hope the writer might have been aiming his pragmatism solely at them.

Rumour has it that said pragmatist is one Carlos Cortiglia, who writes for The Jewish Chronicle: