Nasser looked great there, best he's ever looked. That is a weird video though, and that's probably the only contest I've ever seen where the lighting makes the white guys look better than the black guys

Nasser looked great there, best he's ever looked. That is a weird video though, and that's probably the only contest I've ever seen where the lighting makes the white guys look better than the black guys

so firstly i was posting selected pics and no videos and now the videos are weird .. what is your next excuse gronk??..

no one contest can make a great career but anyway this has nothing to do with nasser who was always on at his best for more than 5 years..

as you yourself said in your previous post nasser and paul were the same weight and according to you now everybody knows that paul had a better shape rounder bla bla bla... so why do you think nasser was always beating him???.. in all fairness at their very best i see nasser better in all poses..

Because Paul couldn't pose worth shit and had a shitty back.

Paul had a better structure, and shape...Hell, he had a better shape than Dorian, but Dorian blew him away in terms of back detail, conditioning, etc.

Shape and structure are only part of the equation, only Flex or Cormier could really get away with being a tad soft...and really, it was Flex out of the two whose shape carried him to more wins.

Dillet at his best vs Nasser at his best would be a good comparison. It could go either way.