Why America Can Not Trust The Motives of Dianne Feinstein

As Senator Dianne Feinstein unveils her latest attempt at grabbing America’s guns, I thought it was appropriate to look at the history of Senator Feinstein, and see if we can trust her sincerity. Is this woman really concerned about the welfare of our citizens or is there another agenda? Ultimately you will have to make that decision for yourself. My intent is to lay out the facts and theories surrounding a woman who has allegedly made a living from corruption and hypocrisy.

Yes I realize that Feinstein was caught in a lie in this video. Big deal. My belief is that all politicians lie and people have come to expect it. I think the much bigger point is by her own admission. “If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United
States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them … Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in, I would have done it. I could not do that. The votes weren’t here.”

“That’s heavy man” (that’s how the throwbacks talk where Feinstein is from). It is obvious to me that Mrs. Dianne Feinstein has no respect for the second amendment. The woman obviously wants to get rid of more than “assault” rifles, as evidenced by her proposed legislation which lists various handguns and shotguns as well. She would leave us totally defenseless if she had her way. Does that sound like a voice who supports the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America? I think not. She has sworn an oath. She ignores the constitution which she is supposed to uphold.

Beyond her obvious obsession with totally disarming the American people also lies a large amount of hypocrisy in the woman’s own actions.

“And then we have Senator Diane Feinstein on the Left Coast who possesses something more rare than a conservative Republican in San Francisco – an unrestricted concealed weapons permit. Apparently without shame, she

participated in a citywide gun turn-in program that was intended to create some kind of statue from the donated guns that were to be melted down. One of her police body guards let it slip that she contributed a cheap model for the meltdown, while retaining her .357 magnum revolver for her own personal self-defense.” Source: http://www.federalobserver.com/archive.php?aid=10104

Now that we have the necessary proof of hypocrisy out of the way, I want to dig deeper into the political career of Mrs. Dianne Feinstein, because I want you to realize that this woman is not just another politician on the far left. She is not another harmless tree hugger in my opinion. I want to examine facts that are far beyond what the general public and media are already talking about.

My belief is that, if you weigh all of the evidence you will question what I myself suspect. Is Feinstein is another career politician who can not be trusted under any circumstances? Allegations of her bending laws and profiting from legislation are somewhat endless. Is this a person that the American people should really be listening to? It’s time for you to look at her history and decide for yourself.

Do You Remember “The Million Mom March?”

“Dianne Feinstein was closely involved in the Million Mom March scandal of 2000, in which this project of Handgun Control Inc. was exposed for using 501(c)(3) tax-exempt money for electioneering. As but one example, the group posted the following on its website:

‘You stand by your guns, Mr. Delay. Come Mothers’ Day, we mothers will stand together on the mall of Capitol Hill to remind your PRO-GUN House that on Election Day, the voters will stand by our children.’

It took the Million Mom March about three days to react to this exposure by admitting that it had lied to its donors and volunteers all along, and that it had always intended to electioneer. The truth was, of course, that the group had been promoting candidates with tax-exempt money even before I exposed it by providing J.R. Labbe with the indicated information. Even after this revelation, however, Senator Feinstein used her position as a senator to aid the group with low-cost airline fares for its activists. Feinstein went even farther by repeating another falsehood with which the Million Mom March solicited money, volunteer time, and corporate contributions:

‘We now have something happening in the US that has never happened before,’ Feinstein says grimly. ‘That is, children killing children with guns. Over 13 a day.’

I looked at the Centers for Disease Control’s statistics for 1999 and 2000, and I discovered that this statement is true only if one counts ‘children’ who are old enough to vote and sign contracts. This was not a mistake. The Million Mom March even posted a web page that admitted as much; 4,233 per year comes to about 12 per day.” Source: http://www.israpundit.com/archives/52337

Have We Forgotten the MILCON Scandal?

“Last week California Senator Diane Feinstein abruptly resigned her position as the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Military Construction Appropriations Subcommittee (MILCON).

The MILCON subcommittee is in charge of supervising military construction. The committee also oversees “quality of life” issues for veterans, which includes building housing for military families and operating hospitals and clinics for wounded soldiers.

During her six years as MILCON leader Senator Feinstein had a conflict of interest due to her husband Richard C. Blum’s ownership of two major defense contractors, who were awarded billions of dollars for military construction projects that were approved by Senator Feinstein.

Did Feinstein Try to Secure 100’s of Billions of Dollars in Gold Mining Rights for a Campaign Contributor?

“If Catellus Corp. receives land from the Chocolate Mountain gunnery range, the Santa Fe would control the exclusive rights to mine the gold trend for nearly 50 miles to the north. This would bypass any possibility of any open appraisal of the gold deposits.

Senator Diane Feinstein used language in the original bill that specifically stated that Catellus Corp. should receive preferential treatment in the disbursement of original government properties.

“Feinstein supported the Iraq war resolution in the vote of October 11, 2002; she has claimed that she was misled by President Bush on the reasons for going to war. However, former UN Weapons Inspector in Iraq Scott Ritterhas stated that Feinstein in summer 2002 acknowledged to him that she knew the Bush administration had not provided any convincing intelligence to back up its claims about the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.[1]”

Ever Wonder Who Keeps Putting Products Made in China on the Shelves of Your Local Wal-Mart?

“Feinstein campaigned for trade relations with Communist China, citing that China should be granted ‘most favored nation’ in terms of trade, meaning it would get the best terms and lowest import taxes. Trade with China has destroyed many American companies, American livelihoods, and a big part of the American way of life. Jobs and technologies were outsourced through NATFA, pushed by the Clinton administration. Today, products sold in America are made by oppressed Chinese children and adults whose labor funds their country’s military expansion. Loads of Chinese products are sold at Wal-Mart, another destroyer of American small business. In fact, Wal-Mart is the number one importer of Chinese goods through the China Ocean Shipping Company (COSCO).” Source: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?54460-Dianne-Goldman-Feinstein-Is-A-Loaded-Gun-Out-to-Destroy-America

Is This Woman Only About the Environment When She Gets Something in Return?

“Dianne Feinstein considers herself an environmentalist. She often boasts about her record in the US Senate, including legislation she spearheaded that resulted in the protection of seven million acres of Southern California desert. But over the past several years, instead of helping to protect pristine wildland in Northern California, the state’s senior senator has been working furiously to block what would become the first marine wilderness on the West Coast.” Source: http://www.wildernesswatch.org/newsroom/guardian/Oyster_Madness.html

Did Feinstein Lie On Her Website By Manufacturing Statistics?

“Not satisfied riding the wave of grief and sorrow that has swept the country over the death of 20 innocent children and 7 adults (all the media types ALWAYS unfeelingly leave out the poor Mother of the murdering psycho), Senator Dianne Feinstein has apparently resorted to misstatements of truth on her web site. In the section covering firearms, www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/ass… she supposedly cites a report by two researchers by the name of Jeffrey A. Roth and Christopher S. Koper. The only problem is she gets the name of the report wrong; the date on which it was published wrong (by two years) and the information she offers is not consistent with what IS contained in their report correctly called: ‘Impacts of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban: 1994-1996′, US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice Publication No. NCJ173405, dated March 1999.

She specifically ‘cites’ page 2 as containing percentages of persons killed. NOWHERE on this report are percentages of persons killed, wounded, or not killed, not wounded offered. The report does state REPEATEDLY that ‘Assault Weapons’ (sic) were/are RARELY used in gun crimes, even before the ban took place. We Americans need to stop, take a deep breath and realize what folks like Dianne Feinstein, Charles Schumer and others are attempting to do by manipulating the feelings of guilt and grief of the average American and doing the same with their fellow representatives and senators. If she is lying to us about this report, what other ‘statistic’ is she lying to us about or badly distorting.” Source: http://www.topix.com/forum/city/arlington-va/TKTFQ3FRO8SE28M5C

OK, I know I said earlier that all politicians lie and we expect it from them. But my biggest question now would have to be… Hey Dianne, if you are seeing statistics in a report that are not there, maybe I have misjudged you all along. I know you are from San Franscisco and maybe you can hook me up with some of those psychedelics.

Now we have two distinct possibilities.

Dianne Feinstein is a morally bankrupt politician who appears to be obsessed with money, power, and her own hidden agenda.

Dianne Feinstein is potentially a die-hard recreational drug user who tends to see things that are not really there.

I sincerely doubt that #2 is true. She is obviously above the status of “Frisco Junkie.” There is always the third option to be fair. Some people will believe that this is a kind and caring woman who will stop at nothing to save the lives of people in this country by taking away our guns. Just don’t touch her guns.

If you want to do further research, all the links listed will take you to full feature articles which go over alleged transgressions in more detail. I have personally seen enough to form my own opinion.

Don't forget to follow the D.C. Clothesline on Facebook and Twitter. PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.

Share this:

About Dean Garrison

Keep it simple. I believe in God, Family and Country (in that order). My articles can be freely reproduced in full, or in part, so long as you credit me as the author and provide some sort of link to www.dcclothesline.com. Send me a Friend Request on Facebook

Dianne Feinstein is definitely a morally corrupt politician obsessed with her own agenda. As a lifelong Californian, it makes me sick that this woman keep getting elected to the position she holds. She does not represent any of the conservatives who are left in California. She, and politicians like her, are the reason my family are considering leaving our beautiful state for more conservative and freedom loving states. Unfortunately, my state now seems to consist of more “takers” (living off the government) than “makers” (businesses that are being chased out of Calif by oppressive taxation and control, or people woking for private industry).

You wrote about the Closing of California’s Deserts, but there is much more to it than that. She had local sheriffs and park rangers harass anyone and everyone who used that desert for any recreational activities ( Prospecting, biking, ATV, picture taking, rock collecting ) and threatened to arrest anyone who stepped foot within these boundaries. I know, we were driven out of the area from Mining Claims and normal desert use by Officials. Diane then went about selling the land and adjacent areas for a test vehicle track to a foreign car maker who had to meet NONE of the environmental conditions to save the ( supposed ) turtle that has ans was never there. She’s on the Take.

Something that I find strangely missing in the whole conversation surrounding gun control is that of protecting against tyranny, which is where (it seems to me) this administration is taking us. Make no mistake, this administration’s attempt at gun control via Feinstein is only the first step in their attempt in disarming We The People (and they will never let a “crisis” go to waste, such as Newtown – never mind that their “solution” does absolutely nothing that would have prevented it from happening, nor will it do anything to prevent such future tragedies. Don’t confuse them with facts or common sense.

They fear an armed citizenry – to what degree is unknown. It would be much easier to attack the citizens if they were unarmed. Supposedly they have assurances from the top military leaders that they will do as ordered by the commander in chief, but I have my doubts about that.

The research and mud found may be fascinating but so what? The dems have reached the tipping point where their breed of needy gov’t dependents out number the conservatives and we are unlikely to reverse this trend until the collapse shakes them all off the gov’t teats… Other than posting and wringing hands what else is to be done to counter such hypocracy and anti constitutionalism?

I keep hearing “Obama” and “Dems” but lets face it. The ENTIRE political system has become so corrupt and elitist, none of them (save a select few) are interested in actually representing their constituents. Until “WE THE PEOPLE” take back our country and Constitution, its just going to get worse.
Remove the perpetual salary for life. Remove the Golden healthcare plan. Make Representatives struggle like the rest of us to pay the bills. I don’t see that ever happening, but in a perfect world? I know I am already on some list somewhere, so lets have ourselves a revolution.

Thanks Dean, for a great blog! Someone forwarded to me your post, “If They Come for Your Gun.” You are right on target. In fact, I am a little jealous (just kidding) at your ability, and willingless to say what has been needed but lacking for some time. I join you in your campaign to inform the public, and will be posting your post on my blogs: http://ChristianBibleThumper.com and http://www.PoliticallyIncorrectClub.com, with a link back to your blog. I also signed up for your future posts. Thanks again! Frank

Now if we could just get this and so many, many other messages across to liberals and the MSM. Until then, we are and remain the Divided States of America, becoming ever more so with each passing day. With the exception of RINO’s, such messages are sermons to the choir. And I bristle with outrage at our majority-led government that goes against all common sense and absolutely everything I and so many others like me believe in. Liberals don’t even pretend to want to even so much as listen to what roughly the other half of the country believes in, and even demonizes that other half of the country. The spineless, empty, self-serving, strategy-lacking bunch of supposed conservatives in congress are all but useless (with a couple of handfuls of exceptions).

What a fine kettle of fish we are in 😛

ps yes I know I’m preaching to the choir here also – I guess I just needed to blow off some steam – thanks for giving me the opportunity to do so – comments welcome

Darrell you might be surprised. I have started reaching out to a lot more liberal friendly forums that reach people on the left and right. That’s why I try to write things in a semi politically correct way. If a liberal minded person takes the time to read it, I don’t want them to feel like my indictment of Feinstein is a direct indictment of them. I am a conservative but I have seen plenty of people on the right that disappoint me as well. I guess I would call myself and equal opportunity hater. My biggest fear right now is that the Republicans are going to throw us under the bus on this legislation, just like they did on the cliff deal.