I warned him that I was a very fierce political animal. I also made it clear to Sgt. Vaillancourt that I have many very justifiable reasons not to trust any cop anymore. I will do as I said and sue the Crown Corp known as the RCMP in the Court of the Queen's Bench in Fredericton unless somebody doesn't act with the scope of their employment ASAP. However I must do as I promised and file my first complaint against the Crown in Federal Court first. In the "mean" time perhaps some local cop in New Brunswick should simply do his job and investigate all the material I have given to them over the years. They really stop their bullshit about jusridiction and mandate in order to protect their personal interests. Do they not understand that I can sue them as individuals? There is nothing wrong with exposing the truth about my allegations of criminal conduct in support of public corruption for the benefit of all Canadians. Just act non paritsan and let the politcal card fall where they may. Lawyers and politicains are infinitely replacable and all falsly claim to be ethical as they pick our pockets. I would love to hear my name mentioned in a very public forum even if it was slandered. Before the Yankee elections on November 7th would be nice EH? Politicians cops and lawyers should look to their own personal interests and then uphold the law and the public trust placed in their positions. After all that is their job not mine N'est Pas? I do not have to do anything any cop or lawyer may wish to suggest anymore. Not all Maritimers are dumb defeatists as Stevey Boy Harper has suggested in the past. At least I am one dumb pigheaded Maritimer who knows the differnce between my rights under the Charter and the government's wrongs practiced against them. I also know when somebody has falied their oath to uphold the law and protect the public interests and I certainly know how to hold them accountable in a legal and ethical fashion. To say you will sue someone is not a threat. It is merely a promise. Most lawyers employ such words everyday and they practice law for a fee. I have taken no oath to obey other then one to my wife and an unspoken one to my seed.. Thus I obey only my own consience and I stress test my own integrity every day in the best interests of my Clan. It is them whom I serve and protect without a fee because it is my duty to do so just as cops and other public servants etc are gainfully employed to protect us all under oath and rule of law. My family has suffered enough over the past five years. Tis high time I sought monetary relief from our bad acting governemnts in order to bring them home to Canada to live in peace and escape further Yankee malice. Anyone can check my work. Much of it still remains on file in the public record of many Yankee courts and one Canadian one. I am certain that anyone would agree that my Clan has had amazing patience thus far. I say nay never no more. I have been a student of enough Canadian law to get a good grip on the scene. It is time to put what I learned to good use for the benefit of my Clan. EH? I am sending three emails to Sgt Vaillancourt and his bosses to protect my own dumb arse from more false allegations I will also use hard copy as evidence against the RCMP in court. Clearly I have introduced him to a few local witnesses EH? Sending these emails to most of them is truly redundant but it is to serve my own ends in the blogs. Charles Leblanc should know by now where to find this particular email posted within a blog. It is easy for anyone call me a liar or crazy as a loon or even to make the false claim that I am some kind of a criminal threat to them. But putting the claim in writing and signng one's name to the document is another kettle of fish. N'est Pas? Try it sometime soon. In fact I Double Dog Dare Ya to. Veritas Vincit David Raymond Amos

Just so the Newfys and the Yankees all know, it was Jim Case of the Newfoundland Constabulary (Rarespade) who told me that he saw Whitey Bulger hanging around his town of St. John's when I was preparing to come home to run for a seat in Parliament in 2004 and do a little bounty hunting on the side. No shit ask Byron Prior or Premier Danny Williams etc..

HOLY SHIT DAVID, THE SCUMBAGS MUST BE CHEWING ON THEIR BOOT STRAPS.I SENT YOU ANOTHER FAX, ITS VERY INTERESTING, I KNOW YOU WILL GET A CHUCKEL OUT OF IT.KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK, MAYBE SOMEDAY SOMEONE WITH A BIT OF DECENCY WILL INVESTIGATE BYRON'S SITUATION AND TAKE ACTION, ITWILL ONLY TAKE ONE RAT TO LEAVE THE BURNING BARN SQUEALING AND THE OTHERS WILL FOLLOW TO SAVE THEIR ASSES.SAM.

Hey Greg As you scroll down to the both of the email you see that Stevey Boy Harper byway of the Privy Council’s reply to me can never deny that he don’t know all about Byron Prior and I now. As if he ever could EH? As I told you on the phone this morning, methinks if anyone truly wishes to know the truth of all that you ask you should Google the name of Byron Prior and that of mine as well it is as I said David Raymond Amos. Better yet pick up the phone and call my cell # anytime after 8 pm in the Maritimes and I will take you down the path through the Garden of Good and Evil that will leave you staggering under the weight of the awful truth. As you could tell I am not a shy man. What you may not know is that I am never reckless with the awful truth. My number is 506 434 1379. I must say I found it rather hard to believe that a journalist in St John’s Newfoundland has not heard of the name Byron Prior by now. I will allow you the license to claim that you have never heard of me and that federal politics is not your forte. However no Newfy who claims to be a journalist is that dumb or out of touch of the local political scene to not know of the lawsuit between the MP Billy Matthews and Byron Prior on file in the Supreme Court of Newfoundland. You write books. Perhaps you should find Martha Jette’s book about Byron and write one of your own. Rest assured I will mention both of you in mine. I ain’t shy about naming names and calling a spade a spade pursuant to the following federal code. One sort of spade I will name is Constable Jim Case of the Newfy Constabulary. He used the name rarespade for his email address as he tortured Byron Prior for years. Hell he even told me saw Whitey Bulger in downtown St. John’s back in 2004. You should know how to read as well as writeEH? Check the law. Byron and his friend Paul Perrier have done nothing wrong. But the people acting against them certainly have. EH?

Criminal Code PART VIII: OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON AND REPUTATION Defamatory Libel 315. No person shall be deemed to publish a defamatory libel by reason only that he publishes defamatory matter in good faith for the purpose of seeking remedy or redress for a private or public wrong or grievance from a person who has, or who on reasonable grounds he believes has, the right or is under an obligation to remedy or redress the wrong or grievance, if (a) he believes that the defamatory matter is true; (b) the defamatory matter is relevant to the remedy or redress that is sought; and (c) the defamatory matter does not in any respect exceed what is reasonably sufficient in the circumstances. R.S., c. C-34, s. 279.

You should also know as well as I that people often fail ethical stress tests when it concerns their own interests. It seemed to strange me that you claim on your own website that you know and write of many things but on the phone to you try hard to play dumb. As you could no doubt tell, I gave up on you rather promptly. I see no need to argue on my dime. I am accustomed to that kind of double talk from lawyers and journalists alike when they do not want to know anymore. Obviously the lawyer Michael Geist is both because of the fact he loves to blog about all that he knows. His silence speaks volumes to me.. I contacted him and the Newfy Constabulary etc as soon as I read his post and the words of Paul Perrier recorded by CBC.. So much or for the ethics of professors who expound of the law EH? Clearly the cat or Stevey Boy Harper has got that Upper Canadian lawyer’s tongue. If Geist is so adept with the internet, he should know everything there is to know about Byron Prior and I by now. Clearly I have been studyinghim. Methinks the Dean of his Law School will have a shit fit in short order after I approach the kids they teach about ethical conduct etc. I think Byron Prior who is in Ottawa once again should go ask that lawyer/professor of Canada’s so called University some questions about publishing the truth on the internet face to face in front of his students. What say you?

Geist says this of himself. And I inserted both of your Bios in this email in order to stress test your ethics as well I am a law professor at the University of Ottawa where I hold the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law. My current contact information is included below:

It appears by way of CBC reporting of Paul Perrier and the following comment by the Current and others has caused Byron Prior to finally break the ice of his matters in the corporate controlled media. Hooray for Paul Perrier. He did what needed to be done. I wish I had thought of it first. As you shall see he clearly told the truth of what he was doing and why. The fact that I understood his game and supported his efforts out of the gate must have Danny williams panties in quite a knot EH?. Ask yourself why nobody mentions me. Paul Perrier is one man with sand and lots of integrity whom I will stand behind until hell freezes over. Look for these words in my own blog Greg. I hope that Paul Perrier does not trust lawyers and the corrupt the Justice System in Newfoundland to protect his rights and interests. Clearly Danny Williams and his cohorts ignore the law all day long. Here is a couple Danny Boy should review before he supports the false imprisonment of another man from the Maritimes. I am going to sue Danny Boy anyway ask his attorney General Tommy Boy Marshall why if you don’t already know.

Criminal Code PART IV: OFFENCES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION OF LAW AND JUSTICE Corruption and Disobedience 126. (1) Every one who, without lawful excuse, contravenes an Act of Parliament by wilfully doing anything that it forbids or by wilfully omitting to do anything that it requires to be done is, unless a punishment is expressly provided by law, guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years. 2) Any proceedings in respect of a contravention of or conspiracy to contravene an Act mentioned in subsection (1), other than this Act, may be instituted at the instance of the Government of Canada and conducted by or on behalf of that Government.R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 126; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 185(F). Criminal Code PART VIII: OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON AND REPUTATION Duties Tending to Preservation of Life 217.1 Every one who undertakes, or has the authority, to direct how another person does work or performs a task is under a legal duty to take reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm to that person, or any other person, arising from that work or task. 2003, c. 21, s. 3

Methinks it is the spoken word of honest common men not VOCM in Newfoundland as they gossip about Danny Williams and his cohorts that will save Paul Perrier from malicious prosecution. I say that Paul Perrier did the right thing and that his only offence is to be a minor nuisance to some very major crooks. Canada needs more men like the man the Current has labeled a hero. Greg this comment on your post within the Current is emailed to you not posted because I am not a member of your blog nor do I wish to be, You have explained to me that the posting was written by someone else but you are the only contact person.. I find that the post is an interesting stress test of the Ethics of the CBC and the Justice System in Newfoundland as a whole by what appears to be an Independent News organization.. I truly did think by your outfit’s name that your were associated with CBC. Please feel free to post my comment to your post and ask me anything you wish in the hope that I can force CBC to obey its mandate. but computers never do. It seems that only machines are capable of acting within the scope of their employment eh? I will forward the two emails that were spoofed about Danny Williams and the NTV as well. Obviously I forwarded this email and the two offending emails to Byron Prior Danny Boy and the NTV and that have made you a witness not only to malicious prosecution but to my own pending complaints as well. It is who that is in the Bcc boxand those I forward this email to afterwards that only the Feds and me will know that should cause you the most concern as I stress test your ethics to the max.. Trust that some will respond to this email and bounce it back to me for my records because I am up to something most folks will not believe. Truth is stranger than fiction and I am about to prove it once more.

Many people consider me crazy or worse yet a criminal. However they can never deny that I ran for a Seat in Parliament twice and in two provincial elections thus far. The false allegations and the simple facts do not fit together very well. I must have been slandered EH? Many people know the reason that a man who has never voted in his life decided to become a very fierce political animal but nobody will say my name not even Byron Prior because it seems my affairs are very scary indeed. To date not one person other than my brother in law, Norfolk County Deputy Sheriff Robert F. O’Meara has been willing to call me a liar and put it in writing. Many people joke and liken me to the Mel Gibson or some other character in a Hollywood movie and suggest I write a book. Well my life ain’t no movie and methinks I should continue living in order to finish the god damned book. Methinks a lot of lawyers and cops will regret that they did not pay better attention to the laws they swore to uphold once the truth of my matters become public knowledge. EH? Everybody knows that there is no honour amongst thieves. Soon or later I will break the ice as well Won’t I Mr. Geist?

Criminal Code PART XIII: ATTEMPTS — CONSPIRACIES — ACCESSORIES 465. (1) Except where otherwise expressly provided by law, the following provisions apply in respect of conspiracy: (a) every one who conspires with any one to commit murder or to cause another person to be murdered, whether in Canada or not, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a maximum term of imprisonment for life;(b) every one who conspires with any one to prosecute a person for an alleged offence, knowing that he did not commit that offence, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable (i) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years, if the alleged offence is one for which, on conviction, that person would be liable to be sentenced to imprisonment for life or for a term not exceeding fourteen years, or (ii) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, if the alleged offence is one for which, on conviction, that person would be liable to imprisonment for less than fourteen years; (c) every one who conspires with any one to commit an indictable offence not provided for in paragraph (a) or (b) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to the same punishment as that to which an accused who is guilty of that offence would, on conviction, be liable; and (d) every one who conspires with any one to commit an offence punishable on summary conviction is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.(2) [Repealed, 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 61] (3) Every one who, while in Canada, conspires with any one to do anything referred to in subsection (1) in a place outside Canada that is an offence under the laws of that place shall be deemed to have conspired to do that thing in Canada. (4) Every one who, while in a place outside Canada, conspires with any one to do anything referred to in subsection (1) in Canada shall be deemed to have conspired in Canada to do that thing. (5) Where a person is alleged to have conspired to do anything that is an offence by virtue of subsection (3) or (4), proceedings in respect of that offence may, whether or not that person is in Canada, be commenced in any territorial division in Canada, and the accused may be tried and punished in respect of that offence in the same manner as if the offence had been committed in that territorial division.

(6) For greater certainty, the provisions of this Act relating to (a) requirements that an accused appear at and be present during proceedings, and (b) the exceptions to those requirements, apply to proceedings commenced in any territorial division pursuant to subsection (5). (7) Where a person is alleged to have conspired to do anything that is an offence by virtue of subsection (3) or (4) and that person has been tried and dealt with outside Canada in respect of the offence in such a manner that, if the person had been tried and dealt with in Canada, he would be able to plead autrefois acquit, autrefois convict or pardon, the person shall be deemed to have been so tried and dealt with in Canada. R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 465; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 61; 1998, c. 35, s. 121.

Criminal Code PART XIII: ATTEMPTS — CONSPIRACIES — ACCESSORIES

463. Except where otherwise expressly provided by law, the following provisions apply in respect of persons who attempt to commit or are accessories after the fact to the commission of offences: (a) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to the commission of an indictable offence for which, on conviction, an accused is liable to be sentenced to imprisonment for life is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years; (b) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to the commission of an indictable offence for which, on conviction, an accused is liable to imprisonment for fourteen years or less is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term that is one-half of the longest term to which a person who is guilty of that offence is liable; (c) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to the commission of an offence punishable on summary conviction is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction; and

(d) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to the commission of an offence for which the offender may be prosecuted by indictment or for which he is punishable on summary conviction (i) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding a term that is one-half of the longest term to which a person who is guilty of that offence is liable, or (ii) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction. R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 463; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 59; 1998, c. 35, s. 120.

Veritas Vincit David Raymond Amos

P.S. If the people at the Current were truly wise they would investigate a really big scoop that no other media has reported on. That said it would not behoove the Current to delete their comment within their own Blog. I already saved a digital copy of the webpage in my reliable little old computer. If they do so it is just another piece of evidence I will employ against the Crown and use to question the Current about why they questioned something one day then ignored the obvious answer a few days later.

Greg says this of himself

Greg has more than twenty years experience as a professional photographer, journalist and editor. His work has appeared in publications and news agencies such as Macleans, Equinox, Canadian Geographic, Reuters, The Globe & Mail, Forbes, Time, Businessweek, Readers Digest, Toronto Star, Canadian Busness, Utne Reader, Men's Health and der Spiegel as well as commercial work for corporate clients including Mobil Oil, Chevron, Texas Instuments, Bank of Montreal, Canadian Bar Association, Petro Canada, Medecins sans Frontieres, Canadian International Development Agency, Newfoundland Hydro, Parks Canada, Kodak Europe and McClelland & Stewart, Canada.

His assignments have taken him from the ice floes and offshore oil fields of the North Atlantic to the civil wars of The Balkans and the conflicts in Central Africa. Locke is equally comfortable working in the corporate boardroom as he is remote field locations.

Dr. Michael Geist does brag a great deal more EH?

Dr. Geist has written numerous academic articles and government reports on the Internet and law and is a columnist on technology law issues that regularly appears in media outlets on five continents including North America (the Toronto Star and Ottawa Citizen), South America (Santiago Times), Europe (BBC), Asia (South China Morning Post), and Africa (Kenya's Daily Nation). He is the creator and consulting editor of BNA's Internet Law News, a daily Internet law news service, editor of the monthly newsletters, Internet and E-commerce Law in Canada and the Canadian Privacy Law Review (Butterworths), the founder of the Ontario Research Network for E-commerce, on the advisory boards of several leading Internet law publications including Electronic Commerce & Law Report (BNA), the Journal of Internet Law (Aspen) and Internet Law and Business (Computer Law Reporter). He is the author of the textbook Internet Law in Canada (Captus Press) which is now in its third edition, and the editor of In the Public Interest: The Future of Canadian Copyright Law, published in 2005 by Irwin Law.

Dr. Geist's work has been recognized with several important awards and grants including the 2002 Canadian Association of Law Teachers Scholarly Paper Award and a major research grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for work on Internet jurisdiction and copyright law. In 2003, Dr. Geist became the first law professor to receive the Ontario Premier Research Excellence Award, obtained a significant grant from Amazon.com to establish Canada first technology law public interest litigation clinic at the University of Ottawa, was named one of Canada Top 40 Under 40, and received the Public Leadership Award from Canarie for his contribution to the Internet in Canada.

Dr. Geist serves on the director and advisory boards of several Internet and IT law organizations including the Canadian Internet Registration Authority , the dot-ca administrative agency, and the Public Interest Registry , which manages the dot-org domain. He was a member of Canada’s National Task Force on Spam and is the former chair of a global Internet jurisdiction project for the American Bar Association and International Chamber of Commerce. He is regularly quoted in the national and international media on Internet law issues and has appeared before government committees on e-commerce policy.

Lots of people were talking then they all seemed to shut up EH?

Lets see it I can get the gossips going once again EH?

Greg’s crowd said this in my humble opinion it is the best piece of gossip yet.

"It is dead easy to originate email that appears to be from anyone you choose" by Sylvia Chafe

CURRENTMAYBE IT’S JUST ME, but I’ve been surprised at the lack of discussion about the reported spoofing of Premier Danny Williams’ email address. I think there are some things that should be discussed.As reported in the media, here’s how the events unfolded, with a little editorializing from myself. In the early hours of August 1, email messages purportedly from Premier Danny Williams began arriving in email inboxes in the provincial government. The messages contained derogatory statements pertaining to the premier himself. Panicked and evidently clueless on how to read a simple email header, someone thought Danny’s government email account had been hacked and decided that the provincial government’s email system had to be shut down. Shut down it was, and for several hours email addressed to the government bounced or sat in queues for later delivery. The RNC was brought in to track down the culprit. Within a couple of days charges were laid against a St. John’s man, who later publicly claimed responsibility. To judge from the interview CBC Radio’s morning show did with him, the fact that he pulled this off is a testament to how easy it is to spoof email addresses.Shutting down a government’s email system because of a spoofed email that almost anyone who has ever looked at an email header would identify as having originated outside government’s network strikes me as quite an over-reaction. Only two possible explanations come to mind, and I don’t like either of them. One is that there was a lot more to this than we have been told about. The other, more likely, explanation is that there was a complete disconnect between the people making the decisions and the people (most of whom are quite competent) who actually run the systems. One might also wonder why messages pretending to be from addresses inside the government’s network would be accepted from the outside, since they would be obvious forgeries. Presumably lessons have been learned and changes made.What bothers me most about this, however, is that there seems to be one law that applies when the Premier is victimized and another for everyone else. It is dead easy to originate email that appears to be from anyone you choose. Danny, for example. Just get an email address and fill in the blanks. Even better, if you put their email address in the "Reply To" field, responses to the messages you send as them go to their email address. This was evidently what our hero in this story intended: to flood the Premier’s inbox with reply messages. Ironically, it is unlikely that Danny himself would have seen any of the replies, until one was brought to him as a sample (it also wouldn’t surprise me if Danny was not aware of the decision to shut down the government’s email system or call the cops). Most likely our hero used the address published on the Internet for the Premier (Premier@gov.nl.ca) as opposed to the address he actually uses. No doubt some unfortunate assistant to an Executive Assistant has the privilege of sifting through the tsunami of spam that washes in there.Your email address has almost certainly been spoofed by spammers and/or as a result of a virus activity on a computer where your address was stored. What do you think would be the reaction if you called Fort Townsend to file a complaint? Right! You would hear them laughing in Harbour Grace.So why is it that when Danny’s email address is spoofed it warrants chewing up scarce police resources, including the RNC Economic Crime Unit and the RCMP Integrated Technical Crime Unit? Not to mention time of the courts. No sane person who read that spoofed email message could possibly have believed it was sent by Premier Williams. (I’ll bet you have received spam from Brad Pitt – do you think he actuallysent it?) Yes it was offensive,and quite possibly libellous. But Danny should have access to the same remedies as you and me: a private investigation and a civil suit. And the cops should be spending their valuable time chasing real criminals.

There is an interesting comment within this blog though before the news got worse.

Worth the cash: Paul Wells on the Premier's meeting It's been a while since Paul Wells' columns at Macleans gained a link from here.Long overdue sez many and I'd agree.So here's a link to his most recent online column (at macleans.ca) in which Paul points out that the Premiers' recent meeting in St. John's was a dismal failure.

Oh no. I fear I have fallen into the mocking tone that sometimes provokes a letter of rebuke from Benoit Pelletier, the Quebec intergovernmental-affairs minister, who plays the same role in the Council of the Federation that the former Cardinal Ratzinger once played in the Vatican: stern-eyed guardian of doctrine and lecturer of apostates. How could you take glee from the provinces' hardship? How does Canada benefit when the provinces lose? Doo-dah, doo-dah. But in fact, the provinces, understood as places where Canadians live and consent to be governed, are fine. Eight of them are in budget surplus. All enjoy near-record low interest rates and unemployment. It's the "provinces" -- understood as jumped-up satrapies whose potentates get to tell the governments of Brazil and China how to trade, as a break from telling the government of Canada how tobudget -- that had a bad couple of days in St. John's. Good thing Paul didn't say something about Danny. Then it wouldn't be an ersatz Ratzinger sending e-mails.Nope.The Premier's personal publicist might pick up the phone or, if the slight was grievous enough, the thin-skinned Prem himself would give you a ring. It's another thing Danny picked up from Brian one day when they were playing golf together.There'd be no chance of spoofing one of those calls.Nosirreee.BTW, speaking of spoofing e-mails: if any one of the eighty people or so who got e-mails purportedly from the Premier's e-mail address actually thought that an address saying "premier@gov.nl.ca" was the real thing, then none of those 80 people ever got an e-mail from the real account. Apparently, they also completely missed that the content defamed the Premier hisself.lookit, people. A spoof has to mimic not merely the address of the sender but the content typically sent from that address. A real spoof is one of those supposedly from your bank or eBay asking for your account number and password. People get fooled because they look real.If people actually though this fake e-mail came from The Danny, then they likely had never seen a real one.If the computer nerds shut down the e-mail system on the off-chance these were real, then those guys need to re-evaluate the security system of the government computers.Seriously.The shareware obviously ain't cutting it.But I digress.As for Paul Wells, when all is done, head over to Inkless Wells, Paul's blog. It is - as usual - an eclectic mix of comments on everything from failing printers to Iggy the erstwhile Liberal leader to a devastating - but brief - review of the Miami Vice movie.Biting. Funny. Worldly. Thoughtful.Paul Wells.What every bloggerwants to be when they grow up.

What words of Paul Perrier that managed to be repeated are the best read of all. .Again I say Hooray for Paul and shame on Danny Boy Williams. His law firm once represented Byron Prior before he became the Premier of Newfoundland

CBC NewsThe Royal Newfoundland Constabulary has charged a 38-year-old St. John's man for mimicking the e-mail address of Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Danny Williams.

The province shut down its e-mail system for several hours last week when it discovered that someone had been sending e-mails from what appeared to be the premier's account. However, a short time after pulling the plug on the government's e-mail system, the messages were discovered to be a ruse. Officials said the person who sent the messages was unable to read the premier's e-mails or access sensitive information. Police said Wednesday that a man was formally charged last week with one count of mischief in relation to the incident. While police have not named the individual, Paul Perrier said this week that he is the man responsible. "Last week I was the man, basically, who made the front page of the Evening [sic] Telegram," said Perrier. Man plans to plead not guilty

Perrier claimed he sent an e-mail containing nasty and wild accusations about Premier Danny Williams last week and he said he made it look like it came from the premier's account. He added it was a ploy to draw attention to children's issues. "I want to rattle this guy's chain, that's why I sent out this spoof e-mail," said Perrier. "I never cracked into no system or anything like that. It was just a little basic program I used to make it look like it came from the premier's e-mail." The provincial government said about 80 employees and an unknown number of outside accounts actually received the message. Perrier, however, claimed the actual number is a lot higher. He said he went to random websites and picked thousands of addresses. "Well, I had a list of about 44- or 45,000 e-mails, I suppose," said Perrier. "I got about 50- to 55,000 out of it, I suppose."While Perrier claimed he sent the e-mails, he said he is going to plead not guilty to mischief at his court appearance in September. The police said an investigation is still underway by the RNC's economic crime unit and the RCMP's integrated technical crime unit. A spokesperson for the RNC said police are not ruling out further charges.

Perhaps everybody should read on and give their Member of Parliament in Ottawa a call before the Newfys prosecute the wrong man again. Ask the Parliamentarians to look out the window and inquire about the Newfy Byron Prior who has been protesting against them on the lawn since the 39th Parliament first sat. What do you think Sam is this worth passing on?

Here we go again, with the frauds and the forgeries. Didn't work then, won't work now. Here's Dave before the judge,,,,,,But your honor since when do I have to own something to claim it for myself. Fuck you, Dave

I will forward just one email between Barry Bachrach a long long time ago that I am certian he and my G.A.L. Brian Bixby will never wish to explain in a Yankee Fedeal Court way down in Dixieland or the Court of the Queen's Bench in Canada. The attachment in the following email is merely two slips of paper. Clearly I did not file two notices of appearance in the same yankee court two days in a row, The second document bears my signature but it is obviously a fraudulent document created by Depupty Dog's lawyer Angela K. Troccoli and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Prime minister Harper and all his underlings are going to have a hard time explaining why they supported the malicious actions of Yankees as he tries to ram his Accountability Act through Parliament. Veritas Vincit David Raymond Amos

I could care less about any town in your country. Hi Sam,,,Hi George,,,,,,,,,you know Dave"I'm gonna sue ya" Amos ? Biggest arsehole in two countries. Hey,,,,,I hear that your family is tired of you. Hmmmm, what a shame. Again, fuck you, Dave

That dumb crooked Yankee is my brother in in law. Obviously he does not even know the difference between one town in Newfoundland and another in New Brunswick. Trust that he has no idea what I am up to but methinks his lawyers wish that he would shut up EH?

Tommorrow is polling day up here and after it is primary day down in the Yankee neck of the woods. Just for the record I should tell my former Yankee lawyer Barry Bachrach that I have a pretty good idea who murdered Anna Mae but the witness up here is too chicken to talk about it. Whereas our latest Attorney General Vic Teows has given John Graham the boot to Yankeedoddleland there ain't much I can do to help him now until I have my own malicious warrants for arrest removed EH? Furthermore why the Hell should I care anymore. As soon as i get back to the USA I am going to sue your law firm and Brian Bixby's for your assistance to the Commonweath of Massachusetts in the screwing of my wife for the benefit of a bunch of bad acting bankers, Gays and Catholic priests etc.

As far as the shit going down up here, obviously Byron Prior is asking for my support once again and I obliged but I also know where the Agent Orange barrels are stashed in Gagetown (right by the Shirley dump which is near Fire Point # 4). Plus obviously I am the only person willing to say that the testing of Corridor Resources has caused the folks in the area to lose their water and for the mine to spring many leaks as well. Everybody but me is too afraid of being sued to state the simple truth about that simple fact. However Barry and a bunch of other Yankees know how I love to argue lawyers EH? Cya'll in Court or Hell. C'est la meme chose. N'est pas?

Barry, the fact that you deliberately intervened in order to help screw my wife and kids will make you very famous someday or my name ain't Dave. You are just another lawyer who loves to FAKE LEFT and all your friends know it. You were right when you told my wife I was going to be pissed off after you screwed her in court. Do you think your law firm will let you go before or after I sue it? Do you or Bixby think that your managing partner is any smarter that David Rosenblatt? Me neither.

Hey Barry If you or you underlings bother to scroll down you will see that I have a huge bone to pick with you in the Court of the Queen's Bench further harrassment of me will not assist the lawyers that must defend your city from my justifiable lawsuit. After you became the latest Chief in Fred city I asked you last year to make your underlings uphold the Police Act as well as the other laws and the Charter. Didn't I? Don't you think they should have quit harrassing me and just did their job as they said they would under oath?

Everybody knows who I am by now. A hairy dude who sometimes wears a Black Watch kilt driving a white Towncar or a black Panhead with Yankee plates is kinda hard to forget in the snotty town Fredericton. Stop it right now will ya? Do you have any doubts that I will sue the City because of the malice and incompetance of its cops, its Mayor and its City Solicitor? Why bury yourself if you manage to come up with some criminal charge to try to stick me with. trust that I with love explaining my matters to a jury on your dime and time.Well I just met two more of your cops (Durling and Arbour if that is how they spell it. They would not for me) last night that do not understand the term privacy. The yo yo named Durling decided to sneak up on me and read what I was typing in my laptop as I sat off the street in a parked car. He demanded to know who I was but refused to take the same material that I had given to the cop name Carl who is running for York. I gave Durling a shocking surprise in that some men know how to defend their rights and ain't scared of corrupt cops not even a little bit. Tell me Chief Barry McKnight when do you think that you and Grant Garneau will ever get around to acting within the scope of you employment? Before I make you famous or right after I sue the City? Kinda late on both counts ain't it Chucky Leblanc?

A lawyer by training, Louis-Philippe was an MLA from 1999 to 2003. He is currently Director of Regional Affairs for the federal Minister Greg Thompson. Originally from Sainte-Rose, he has a bachelor in business administration (B.A.A.), a law degree (LL.B.) and a master in business administration (M.B.A.). Louis-Philippe is also actively training in endurance sports and taking care of his blueberry fields.

Say hey to that nasty bastard Greg Thompson for me will ya McGraw?.Better yet I just did. N'est Pas? So should I say hello to Charles LeBlanc for you?

I hope some liberal wannabe MLA displace just enough conservatives like they did you last time around to make just a very slim majority like Bernie Lord had last time around. I would dearly love to see a few NDP get in and rule the roost like Tanker Malley did this spring. Now that would be a truly entertaining circus to watch..

Guess who is in town Chucky. Let just say any fool can sing the Blues lets see if you can live them. Veritas Vincit David Raymond Amos

Byron I just called the Morris law office but after we talked a few minutes it appears he hung up suddenly. However the same thing happened yesterday when I was talking to a politcal priest in New Brunswick who is running for the NDP up on the Mirimichi. I suspect the Feds are playing games with me as usual. That said I did manage to tell Mr Morris I will send him a few emails to aid in his defence of his clieit. If he wishes he can call my number (506 434 1379) and deal with my voicemail, then let me know when is a good time to call him back. At the very least he can never say he does not know of my support of you way back in 2004 before I ran for a seat in Parliament the first time anound. Since then I ran in the 2006 federal election, the election in June in Nova Scotia and I am now running in the present election in New Brunswick. I plan to file the first of many lawsuits against the Crown this week.

To aid in your friend's defence I will forward to his lawyer and obviously many others my answers to his spoof emails. At the very least I am a witness against the Newfy Justice system's actions against him. He needs to be very careful because I suspect they are employing criminal chages that could involve imprisonment. You must remember what the Yankees did to me in order to coverup their wrongs against my Clan. Don't think the same cannot happen to the young fella supporting you.

I recognized his game as soon as I read what he sent to me and many others. In fact he explained what he was up to within the spoof emails. This young fella has big balls. I liked his open and honest stlye of taking on the smiling bastards.I supported him immediately by answering the emails and adding some stuff gleaned from the web about you. I also sent him an email with some of my stuff attached to help him out as soon as I read the following CBC news report and his name was mentioned. however methinks that the cops quite likely had his computer by then and kept that email to themselves because I was complaining of them at the same time for their cover up of my concerns and allegations.

This is the best I can do for now from afar. After this particular election is over I just may catch a boat to the Rock and idle around St John's Newfoundland a while on my old Harley in order to jerk some chains myself. I really should sue some lawyers would failed to uphold the Law Society Act. That Rhodes Scholar named Danny Williams is at the top of my list of lawyers I hope to sue someday after i take on the Crown. His Attorney General Tommy Boy Marshall and all the corrupt cops who support them do not scare me one little bit. If they get for some trumped up charge they will have a hell of an argument coming from a Pro se defendent just like Michael bray laments of over here after the CBA meeting over on the Rock. If I some how quit breathing my ghost will get even with all the smiling bastards for me. Trust that simple fact. You know I keep good records and they are far more complete and accurate than any crooked clerk's of any court..

Man claims he spoofed premier's e-mail address Last Updated: Thursday, August 10, 2006 9:50 AM NT CBC NewsThe Royal Newfoundland Constabulary has charged a 38-year-old St. John's man for mimicking the e-mail address of Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Danny Williams. The province shut down its e-mail system for several hours last week when it discovered that someone had been sending e-mails from what appeared to be the premier's account. However, a short time after pulling the plug on the government's e-mail system, the messages were discovered to be a ruse. Officials said the person who sent the messages was unable to read the premier's e-mails or access sensitive information.

Police said Wednesday that a man was formally charged last week with one count of mischief in relation to the incident. While police have not named the individual, Paul Perrier said this week that he is the man responsible. "Last week I was the man, basically, who made the front page of the Evening [sic] Telegram," said Perrier. Man plans to plead not guilty Perrier claimed he sent an e-mail containing nasty and wild accusations about Premier Danny Williams last week and he said he made it look like it came from the premier's account. He added it was a ploy to draw attention to children's issues. "I want to rattle this guy's chain, that's why I sent out this spoof e-mail," said Perrier. "I never cracked into no system or anything like that. It was just a little basic program I used to make it look like it came from the premier's e-mail."

The provincial government said about 80 employees and an unknown number of outside accounts actually received the message. Perrier, however, claimed the actual number is a lot higher. He said he went to random websites and picked thousands of addresses. "Well, I had a list of about 44- or 45,000 e-mails, I suppose," said Perrier. "I got about 50- to 55,000 out of it, I suppose." While Perrier claimed he sent the e-mails, he said he is going to plead not guilty to mischief at his court appearance in September. The police said an investigation is still underway by the RNC's economic crime unit and the RCMP's integrated technical crime unit. A spokesperson for the RNC said police are not ruling out further charges.

Byron Prior wrote:

David, again THANKS, this is wonderful and should be just what his lawyer needs, by the way is name is Kent Morris fax# 754-5715 or toll free tele # 1-866-754-4124 e-mail morrislaw@nf.aibn.com I know you won't bother to contact him. David be nice to him and ask why can't he represent me also? I can give him all my info, I know, you have all of it. Thanks again Byron

----- Original Message ----- From: David AmosTo: ByronSent: Saturday, September 09, 2006 2:01 AM Subject: within this email is the proof I forwarded the text of you webpage the all the MPs

sans ms" Hey I just called and introduced myself. I knew all along that the prosecutor was McAvity himself and the legal aid lady was Gallagher. I just wished for him to be honest about it all. Thank you for being honest enough to admit that you at least still had the copy of wiretap tape numbered 139. I also called Sgt. Copp of the Fredericton PD in answer to his letter yesterday as soon as could after getting out of jail. He never returned my call and I am not surprised. Corporal Ross had everything he said needed since June 24th. There is now a rather large personal injury lawsuit heading up-home in the near future. I seen no need to explain it to you at this time as I am certain that your already know the reason it is necessary. As i said I will look forward to arguing you in court. The timing of your letter to me was really quite offensive to me. It appears that you sent it to me once you knew I was heading to jail and that they were trying to put me away as a nut. As soon as I appeared in Dorchester District Court on on Oct 1st it was obvious that they had a malevolent plan against me particularly in light of the fact that I had filed original wiretap tapes over a month before in two courts one in each country. The same holds true for Sgt. Copp. Not one word has ever been mentioned about them except by the DA Tim Cruz and the US Attorney Don Feith over a year and a half ago when they falsely claimed that they were evidence in my wife's Probate Matters after the DHS tried to take me away. May i suggest that you sit back and listen to the CD if you already haven't and prepare your defense of your own interests. I my opinion you have failed the Public Trust. The fact that you agree with Brad Green merely serves to prove my point. Even the Governor General admitted that he was the right dude to give my stuff to. Wayne Steeves, as you certainly failed to act within the scope of his employment. In return for you mocking candor I will forward you some emails that are being read around the world. They come through in Yahoo as attachments but I assure you that they are free from viruses. If they weren't, I would have heard about it yesterday from Anne McLellan or Eva Plunkett or Margaret Bloodworth.

You might as well have a look at them because you letter to me was sent immediately to Parliament. Say hey to Bruce Noble for me will ya? Tell Shirley McLean she is now way past too late to act with integrity. ms"> You might as well share what you know to be true with Diane Bourque. I called her office a long long time ago and spoke with her directly as I did you. She took notes. Perhaps she should review them. There is now no need to send her hard copy. Your are Associated with her as is Shirley McLean and Bruce Noble to name a few. I will call Ms. Bourque again (514) 875-6351 after sending this email in order to assure her of my sincerity. Byway of this email she now knows the truth for herself. If she wishes she can call my attorney Joyce Richardson at 506 432- 4888 and ask her any thing she wishes before I begin the litigation process. I will prosecute my matters with you Pro Se. Joyce is an important witness because she accompanied me to the meeting with the Police Commission and also attempted to be the Conservative MP for Fundy in stead of the malevolent Rob Moore.. Ask Mr. Keirstead under the Minister of Public Safety if you don't believe me.

At the very least I have proof that this email was sent to you and all the others mentioned in this email. Even if you deny receiving it or anyone fails to respond, it is still evidence with far more traceable information than the Canada Post you sent me. I have found this necessary to do because because it appears that CISIS now intercepts both my Canadian Mail and my US Mail so I am forced to resort to emails or delivering in hand with a witness. Mr. Mockley, your knowledge of wiretap matters will prove quite valuable to me in the near future.

Mayor Woodside it is time for you to sit up and pay attention. I you don't think a man can't sue City Hall you really should check my work. I did not pick this fight with Fredericton. Your Police Dept. threw me out of the legislature and assisted the Sergeant at Arms in banning me from the premises. I can easily prove prior contact with your City Solicitor, one of you Councilors and the Fredericton Police Dept. byway of emails phone calls and personal visits over the course of last summer. If you have any questions contact Bolduc Clement and maybe he will allow you to listen to the tape of our meeting in the office of the New Brunswick Police Commission on August 24th immediately afterwords I saw you City Solicitor Bruce Noble waddle by and we did make eye contact. I remember him and I have no doubt that he remembers me. Trust the fact that once you meet me, I am rather difficult to forget. Many lawyers and politicians will swear that to be a true statement.

Trust me, now that I have emerged from the downtown jail in Beantown. I am very very pissed off. I will seek relief from all who conspired to put me there based on false allegations made by a very crooked little lawyer. I have got Ms. Troccoli fired from two law firms in their malicious efforts to disassociate with her before the shit hits the fan. It is now October and the Corrupt Court will not admit that my wife's Uncle Franky has be dead since the time I ran for Parliament in June. Both he and his siblings are are buried right beside Rose Kennedy. Need I say more? Yea why not? the last surviving brother in Boston that stole all of my wife's inheritances is an ex FBI Agent who know knows far to much about public corruption to allow a simple Maritime man find justice for his Clan. Putting me in jail as some sort of nut was a very desperate act of a very corrupt justice system in order to cover up their own wrongs and protect the reputation of many a low man in high places.

My last question to all of you is do you not understand the meaning of your oaths? I will ask it again later in court. ms"> Cya'll in Court :) sans ms"> David Raymond AmosNote: forwarded message attached.

Hmmmm As I watch you fellas play your wicked game, it seems that you forgot the the wild card that is in the game as well. The joker or the self proclaimed court jester that is me. Or didn't anyone tell you this morning that I got out of jail last night and escaped Ashcroft's clutches once again for a little while at least? I bet you do know now because Rob Moore must be screaming for help like a little stuck pig by now. You Bloomberg dudes ain't fooling me because I am too stupid. Plus there fact that I sent Bloomberg the same letter I sent Mulroney a long long time ago and little while before that I had talked personally to his reporter in the White House. I am certain he knew of that conversation. I will wager I am having more fun than you guys are right now. I will leave you all to wonder who gets this email next. Tommorrow we shall see if he has enough sand to make history or if he made a deal with you devils. Some honest folks are having a pretty good laugh right now at your expense. I certainly hope the rest of Canada joins in on the chuckle. APEX in Ottawa and Accenture/McGraw Hill in New York are about to make their big plans for our future while I ran around chucking wrenches in the works. Trust me this is fun.

Tomorrow is another day and I would not want to spoil the show. If the Yankee bastards come get me tonight, methinks they will be to late to stop the circus. Rest assured I will die smiling because I know what I did today and they don't. No matter what they choose to do to me I cannot undo what I have already done. What a difference a day makes eh? Oct. 6 (Bloomberg) -- "Canada's biggest opposition party said it would support Prime Minister Paul Martin's legislative agenda as long as he adds five pledges, including a commitment to lower taxes on poor families and to hold a parliamentary vote on whether Canada joins the U.S. missile defense program.

Conservative Leader Stephen Harper, 45, made his demands in an amendment to yesterday's Throne Speech, which laid out the government's program. The speech is considered a ``confidence'' matter, meaning the government will fall should the majority of members of Parliament vote against it. Tony Valeri, the Liberal minister in charge of organizing the legislative schedule, said he needed more time to decide whether the government could agree to the changes. Any votes on amendments to the Throne Speech will be votes of confidence, Valeri said. One may take place tomorrow, he said. `Big Problem' ``Anything that changes the intent of the government is obviously something that we have a big problem with,'' Valeri told reporters in Ottawa. ``There's a lot to look at, a lot to consider.''

Jack Layton, leader of the New Democrats, indicated that he would back the Liberals. ``We will not play chicken with an opportunity to make positive change,'' Layton said in the House of Commons. "

At best, the speech amounts to a high-risk attempt to tilt the balance in the House of Commons in favour of the Liberals by polarizing it along federalist/sovereignist lines.

At worst, it is the clumsy product of a governing party that is willing to break at the first opportunity rather than bend to the realities of minority rule.

What it is not is the work of a government that has broken a sweat searching for ways to make do in uncertain circumstances.

For the most striking feature of Martin's second Speech from the Throne is that it is so much like the first one.

Poring over its 15 pages, one is at a loss to find signs that its authors drafted it with a serious thought to its changed circumstances and the election-imposed necessity to reach out to the opposition to survive. Yo, Adrienne Yesterday while my wife and friends from Canada were busy with their last dimes bailing me out of a Boston jail that the fat dumb and happy old lawyer Ronald A. Irwin didn't care that I was in, you were busy making your big speech and bragging of preparing for another fancy world tour at Canadian expense. When I read your speech today, I saw red. I expected the political double talk kissing Martin's ass simply because he has covered your butt with respect to all the money you squandered. However stealing a little glory from the veterans of past wars was to much for me to stand. You really pissed me off and I must register my indignation now.

In your speech you paid homage to dead men from World War II that I was named after and talked of visiting Saint John NB amongst other places. Perhaps you should have stopped at the Veteran's hospital in Saint John and talked to one of the last surviving 48th Highlanders that went up through Africa and Italy. His name is ol Tom. He has been through hell and back many times and still retains a remarkable Joie de Vivre. He is one of my best friends in life and it was his kilt that I wore while campaigning for Parliament. I was also wearing it as I went off to jail as well back out again. I am sure Tom would have loved meeting you and telling you a few horror stories about the war and about the great times that we have shared together as friends. He is thirty years my senior but he has long recognized the attibutes within me that would befit a proper lady from hell. Ask Mr. Irwin's help about a proud man they met yesterday within the living hell of a Beantown jail. Ol Tom, my father and many other good men taught me to never surrender, never take prisoners, maintain your pride and ethics and never stop enjoying whatever life may throw at you. Ol Tom, my father and all the others saw too many friends that never had a chance to enjoy the sort of life that I have lived. I thank Ol Tom for his friendship and support he is my only friend of the old school of decnt men that I have known who is still alive. It is now my turn to make their lessons and memory live on. Rest assured Tom will receive a copy of this letter.

(: I hope to see you once again real soon Corporal Hee Haw. You know I just gotta jerk your chain to hear the old dog growl. Me old Yamaha is waiting for you to ride. I will ride along with Superfarmer's old Kawi. To hell with the Harleys they are too expensive and slow for the pace. Our old bikes have been stress tested for over the 25 years why quit riding them now? Beside we are all as poor as church mice these days we might as well enjoy the day with what we already have. Say hey to Dave for me as he reads you this letter and give him a kiss for me until payday :) This note is no joke I have more respect for Ol Tom than a million politicians. If there is anyone that I wish to be remembered byway of this email, it is him. I simply don't give a damn if anyone else reads it but I know many will very very soon. You can take that to the World Trade Bank.

It was no accident that I put my name on the ballot in Fundy on June 7th. That was the day my mother's favorite brother died in Normandy. She honoured me with his name, Raymond. My father, who was the sole survivor of a plane crash during the war honoured me with the name of his friend. David who went on to be awarded the Victoria Cross for his bravery. Obviously I put my full name on the ballot not only to honour both my mother and my father but to most importantly of all to honour the men like ol Tom still living who sacrificed so much in order for me to be allowed to speak up and defend the rights that so many people like him have fought to defend.

After all the prior contact with you and your office, you chose to defend the likes of Paul Martin and his many cohorts and head out to party some more? Shame on you. The following are your words and the following emails are my words and proof that I am making my best effort to properly shame you in an ethical fashion. If for no other reason someone must bear witness for the living and the dead so that their sacrifices were not in vain. It is now the end of the first day of Parliament and it appears that my former political opponent Rob Moore, who is appropriately named as well is apparently struck dumb by my contacts with him and I have not heard from anyone that was willing to act honourably and call for a confidence vote. Methinks I will chastise the NDP first because they are the biggest disappointment to me. As you can see I have already begun. I had high hopes for them because their party contained the least amount of lawyers.

Adrienne, why you would choose to continue to honour the likes of T. Alex Hickman is way beyond Byron Prior's understanding and mine as well. Rest assured that we are cut from the same cloth as our forefathers who fought to defend our Queen. We will speak for the rights they gave us. The same ones that you and all those in public service deliberately deny us. What say you now oh ye fine and fancy lady? Adrienne's (Martin's) words "I congratulate both the returning members of Parliament, as well as the more than one hundred who are newly elected, as you take up your duties in the House of Commons for this Thirty-Eighth Parliament of Canada.

This year, Canadians commemorated the 60th anniversary of D-Day and the landing of allied forces in Europe—an event that spelled the beginning of the end of the Second World War. Canadian soldiers, sailors and aircrews fought with dogged bravery and were ultimately victorious on Juno Beach that day. Shortly, I will be going to Italy to commemorate the significant campaign in which six thousand Canadians sacrificed their lives. To me, personally, these commemorations are a symbol of our eternal gratitude and an affirmation that we have not forgotten. On these occasions, we are reminded of the huge debt we owe to those in uniform who have served this country—then and today. Our veterans connect generations and Canadians. As a country and as individuals, we gain in pride and in purpose from their deeds and their service.

I recently concluded extended visits to six cities of varying size—Saint John, Quebec City, Toronto, Saskatoon, Calgary and Vancouver. In them, I found remarkable, innovative projects for social renewal and individual commitment. They express the confidence and love that we all hold for this country. This is the spirit of Canada I see as Governor General."

Methinks it is time to sue you too.What say you? By the way do you know the name of the RCMP officer that I was talking to on June 19th about you and Mr. Harper as he guarded you folks while you and Elsie had some Ice Cream and Harper smoozed the crowd? I have enclosed a photo to refresh your memory. On that day in front of many witnesses, I told you I would sue you if you did not uphold the Public Trust. You told me you were too busy playing politics but for me to keep up the good work.How am I doing?

It has been almost five months since you and I first talked. You have done nothing to uphold the law as a lawyer and an officer of the court. Lawyer prepare to defend thyself in civil lawsuits. Say hey to Arthur Hamiton for me will ya? MS"> Cya'll in Court:) MS"> David R. Amos

P.S. Byron Prior and I both think today is a Good Day to inspire a confidence vote in Parliament since the Governor General didn't bother to to do the right thing yesterday. She can never say she didn't know the truth. I have answers from her and two of her Lt. Govs. Lets see if a few emails from Byron and I can shake some trees and cause the rotting liberal minority to fall.

Just so ya know David I am forwarding these emails to other politicians as well. But I didn't bother to call them because they are lawyers as well. Therefore I see no need to explain my actions to them. Plus the smart one's have a bad habit of trying to ignore me anyway. I t appears that standard operating procedure for them is to ignore. delay, deny and then try to settle. They are confused by someone that wants to argue law rather than go away with the gold. What should be interesting to both of us is whether or not they have a sudden fit of ethical behavior after they discover that an honest western farmer and wild but ethical maritime biker have been talking about them. Please notice that I am more than willing to help such a man as Byron Prior anyway I can. I just wish there were more men like him on this planet. Trust me the US Attorney backtracking in the Martha Stewart matter and prosecuting a Secret Service Agent is too funny to relate in this email.

Deal with your own conscience. After that try to think of> > a good> > > reason why I should not run for Parliament and at least speak> > my mind about the sad state of our affairs. You know who I am.> > If you don't, trust me,you are way behind the eight ball.> > > Once I make my mark in the American Justice System and> > political> > > process, I am coming home to stress test the ethics of many a> > lawyer/politician in my nativeland during the course of the> > next federal election. My question to all of you will be why> > did you wait for me to say something? Am I the only one paying> > any attention. Even Jesus got mad a time or two and tore up a> > temple when he saw all the money changing hands in a place> > that should not be concerned about such things. But forget> > about the money for a minute. What did he have to say about> > anyone that harmed a child? Rest assured I will remind you.> > Although I ain't religious, I must say that Jesushad more of> > sand than most men and he made some very good points about> > what is right and what is wrong. Can any of you even hold a> > candle to Byron? He has at least one friend that will back him> > up all the way down the line. I don't mind dying it is what I> > didn't do while I was living that will haunt me in in my> > grave. What is the golden rule these days? Is it truly a fact> > that he with the gold makes the rules. Do you think voters> > agree with that fact? What say you?> >

> Canadian Corruption> > >> > > Sexual Abuse & Political & Legal Conspiracy.> > >> > > RCMPIncompetence & Cover up.> > >> > > Priors Of Grand Bank NFLD Canada> > >> > > How do I get a corrupt legal system to investigate, charge and> > convict itself? After years of asking the Canadian Legal> > System to do its job, it's long past time to inform the public> > myself about this lack of action or justice.> > > If T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, 1966 to 1979 also Health> > Minister 1968 to 1969 and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court> > of Newfoundland 1979 to 2000, 34 YEARS OF COMPLETE LEGAL> > SYSTEMS CONTROL,at 41 years of age, rapes and impregnates your> > younger sister Susan, at 12years old, and in grade 8, what> > would you do?At 12 years old she was the youngest child> > ever,in Grand Bank,to have a baby. I am willing to take any> > tests and answer all questions regarding my entire life. All> > he has to do is take one blood test. It's time for him to stop> > manipulating our legal system and face the truth which I have> > been telling the legal System,and anyone else who would> > listen, all of my life.I didn't just awake one morning and> > decide to accuse the most powerful and most corrupt legal> > animal in this province. I have had, no childhood, no> > education, no family, no hometown, no self- esteem or> > self-respect and no past, present or future as a contributing> > person.> > >> > > By the time Iwas 14 years old I was responsible for 9 younger> > children, all of us abused and molested while our hometown> > either joined in, bothered us about our situation, or looked> > the other way and said we were all trouble. Our mother has> > always been a hypochondriac and married prostitute in a town> > of 2500 people. She can go blind instantly, become a cripple> > instantly, go insane instantly and even convinced the doctors> > at our Health Science Center 4 years ago she was dying of> > cancer. They called her family and said she had a maximum of> > two weeks to live, but out of every situation she can> > instantly become well. This person is a disgrace to the human> > race and also so are all those who support her. I am Byron> > Prior, the oldest of her 12 children.> > > (A) I was sexuallyabused by my mother from age 4 to 14.> > >> > > (B) Physically beaten by my mother until I bleed because I> > tried to stop her friends and family from molesting my younger> > sisters.> > >> > > (C) Sent next door with my mother's gay boyfriend almost daily> > for money from age 5 to 14.> > >> > > (D) Brought to her drunk girlfriend's summer cabin to be> > sexually abused for money.> > >> > > (E) Had to clean the blood from my 4 year old sister aftershe> > was sexually molested by our grandfather and left on the> > kitchen floor in a pool of blood.> > >> > > (F) Had to watch while my oldest sister had three miscarriages> > and two children by the age of 15. One child for a member of> > the Newfoundland Government when she was 12, and a second> > child when she was 15 for another Politician, a girl, Majorie> > and a boy, Arron. In 1983 the girl, age 15, was given an> > illegal abortion in Montreal with everything arranged and paid> > for with spending money for her and my sister Joan, by a> > friend of the family. This girl has worked for Hickman's> > family business from high school to this day. Five of my> > sisters and one brother suffered similar abuse as I did.>> > Why is this situation allowed to continue for more than 40> > years and ruin all my families lives? Is it because,> > > (A) Our mothers past customers are politically connected and> > run our legal system.> > >> > > (B) Our mothers past customers are Grand Bank business men> > whose children are now politicians.> > >> > > (C) One of our mothers family is a big wheel with organized> > crime all of his adult life and is a partner to politicians.> > >> > > (D)Is it because two of her past customers are Salvation Army> > officers, who came by to help us but became customers as well.> > (E) Is it because all of North America is corrupt and a family> > of 12 really means nothing to anyone when business and> > politics are concerned in an economy controlled by corruption.> > (F) Is it to cover up Child rape and corruption by T. Alex> > Hickman and a business family with influence and business> > contacts all across Canada. The legal system now tells us> > justice for my family and I are three charges against one> > mentally delayed man with a judge and jury at the T. Alex> > Hickman building in the same town where we spent our entire> > lives with abuse and persecution. Two R.C.M.P. officers and> > the Crown prosecutors office will make no effort to have the> > location changed. Again there will be NOJUSTICE SERVED and as> > much covered up as possible. This I'm told will begin in Sept.> > 2001, at Grand Bank, NFLD I spoke with the Crown Prosecutor on> > Sept,18/01. He said his office has been trying to get the> > complete investigation reports from the RCMP for more than two> > years now and to this date still hasn't received them. He said> > this was in his experience, the first time he had ever seen> > such an unexplained delay to get information. On Nov 29/01 I'm> > told by Victim services, this has changed to Jan.11/02 for a> > trial date to be set.> > >> > > To whom it may concern: 04/13/98 There are many horrors that I> > can recall from childhood. Byron's too frequent trips to the> > woodshed next door; his having to sleep in thesame bed as our> > Mother; his little hands, palms down, being held on the hot> > coal stove burner; the never ending beatings with belt> > buckles; braided nylon ropes; old- fashioned ironing cords;> > hot tea thrown in our faces or the face of my Father; knives> > and forks thrown at us; hot grease thrown at us or our Father;> > continual molestation - sexual - to myself and other siblings;> > continual verbal and emotional abuse; at eight years old I was> > locked in the cupboard under the stairs for hours with rats> > crawling around me because my little brother had misplaced his> > baby bottle while I was in charge of him; continual> > abandonment when Mother would take her vacation and leave us> > at seven and eight years old to take care of ourselves and the> > babies; being forced to quit school to go to work to provide> > yetmore money for our beloved Mother; my younger brother,> > Allan, being thrown into jail for no legitimate reason, other> > than she wanted him out of the house - by the way; if you> > check, you will also find that there is no record of his> > incarceration; the abuse that we suffered was, and remains,> > never ending........ Our lives have been destroyed. We all> > suffer from severe emotional problems. We have extreme> > difficulty trusting others. We cannot form loving> > relationships. It is very difficult for us to allow others to> > get that close to us without pushing them away. All we ever> > wanted was someone to love us for who we were; but, when we> > get close to others, we tend to sabotage those relationships -> > unconsciously. The cycle of abuse continued with my own> > daughter. My younger brother, Randell, molested her fromthe> > age of four years. This fact my daughter was afraid to confide> > to me until a year and a half ago. May God have mercy on his> > soul because "I Don't"!!!! Both Byron and myself have tried to> > have those in authority - RCMP, Social Services, Clergy and> > Teachers help us, but, our cries for help fell on deaf ears.> > We were, to them, a disposible family of liars and children> > with overactive imaginations. Nothing can make the nightmares> > go away. Even the sleeping pills don't work anymore. It has to> > end! There has to be justice and a sense of closure for all of> > us. Please, if we stop this cycle of insanity from happening> > to other innocent children, then maybe our lives would have> > not totally been in vain. You are our hope. Please help us to> > find justice.> > > Sincerely Yours,> > > Sharl (Donna) Prior> > >> > > April 14, 1998> > > A letter of Shame;> > > This letter concerns what happened to my family and myself.> > The things that I remember are also the things I try to> > forget. I'm not very good with words so I will only tell you a> > few things of many which have happened within my family.> > Leather belts, ironing cords, ropes were only some things I> > was beaten with so many times I can't count. Verbal and mental> > abuse, the same humilating things that were done to my sisters> > and brothers. Girls having to pull down their pants and peain> > their underwear for our mothers long time friend, for money. I> > remember our mother going into a bedroom with him and coming> > out some time later. We have a brother and sister (who I love)> > who look and act like this guy. I expect, without much doubt,> > are his. I remember the abuse to my father, a man I loved with> > all my heart. Attacks on him with anything our mother could> > put her hands on, knives, hot water, chasing him out of the> > house. This man was home maybe a day every ten, and she would> > blame him for everything and when Dad wasn't around, we were> > blamed for everything, which was anything. This is a woman who> > every chance she had would call the police on me to try to> > have me charged with something. This was when she couldn't> > beat me anymore because I was a little older, but she still> > had tohave control over me. This was a small town in> > Newfoundland with a population of 3500 people. So she would> > have me taken away from my home by the police and I would have> > nowhere else to go, this was control over me and she knew it.> > I would have to kiss ass just to have a roof over my head. (Of> > course this was after my father had passed away. He was afraid> > of her but he would never have let her do this to me.) This is> > a woman that had me put in jail during Christmas and New> > Year's when I was very young. This was for trying to teach my> > niece her homework, she said I had to ask her. Education was> > not something she was concerned about for her kids. All she> > wanted was when I had turned 15 was to get out of school and> > go to work in the fish plant so I could pay my way every week.> > She would loan me $20 and I wouldhave to repay her $40 plus> > rent. This woman has a lot of problems. I do not hate her> > because she is my mother but I do not like her as a person.> > > I finally got out and moved to Ontario, uneducated with no> > direction, but out. I really haven't had any contact with her> > since then and have not seen her since. I think because of all> > these things and many more which as happened to me and things> > I saw that had happened to other members of my family is the> > reason I have a hard time to meet anyone, develop a> > relationship, or hold down a job. I'm always lost, I don't> > know if I should see a doctor or if it's just me, I'm lost.> > The way I am now is the way the rest also is, it must be> > because of her, take a look, it has to be. I'm writing this> > letter now so that thiswoman and the others who knew what was> > happening but did nothing face up and admit what happened. All> > of my family have the same problems and the same memories> > which affect our lives. This is something I have never spoken> > about with anyone, but now maybe it's time. Hopefully, this> > will help me start to became a real person a whole person.> > Please do what you know is the right thing to do.> > > Sincerely yours,> > > Allan Prior> > >> > > To Whom It May Concern:> > > July 24, 2001> > > My name is Byron Prior. I'm the oldest living of these12> > children. I not only had to live through my abuse but, watch> > as the rest of my sisters and brothers were abused and raped.> > Three of my sisters raped, 1 by a grandfather at the age of 4,> > a second raped by T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, at age> > 11. A third sister raped by a young man in our home town. The> > legal system are only concerned with keeping all this under> > cover and protect themselves. Please people, if you have a> > heart, walk one day in my shoes and tell me you would just> > forget because these bureaucrats say so. I have copies of my> > full statement on all the details of what happened, which I> > gave the R.C.M.P. on March 9, 1998, 52.5 hours at their> > office. I will send it to anyone who will send me an E-mail> > address. I will never forget the abuse, shame, and persecution> > to this day,from the animals who did this to my family.> > > Sincerely,> > > Byron Prior> > >> > > On April 3, 2000, the second in command of the R.C.M.P. for> > all of Canada, said in an interview from Toronto, organized> > crime totally controls Canadian businesses and affects every> > Canadians daily life, from video arcades to laundry mats. This> > is very sad, here in Canada we are lost and we all need help.> > Here in Newfoundland our Dictator, T. Alex Hickman, has had> > his hands in our Political and legal systems from 1957 to this> > very day. His family and friends control everything, including> > whether my family and I ever get justice for what was doneto> > us in the town of Grand Bank. We've tried for justice at least> > 9 times from Police, Social Services, Clergy and Family> > members. This last attempt started on March 9/98. On July> > 24/98 an RCMP officer told me they have enough information to> > charge our mother and one boyfriend now.> > >> > >> > > On February 25/00 an RCMP officer said he was recommending the> > justice department should lay 35 charges against several> > people. This officer was taken off the case, transferred from> > Grand Bank to St. John's custom's department position and his> > wife transferred to a new position in St. John's with> > Provincial social services department. To this day August> > 20/01only 3 charges are laid against one mentally delayed> > boyfriend and no trial date set yet . The trial date has been> > set for April 29/02. On April 5/02 I spoke with the Crown> > Attorney, Ted Cardwell, he said the only two witnesses for the> > trial on our behalf will be my sister Joan and me. The> > investigating officer John Warr of the RCMP is not necessary,> > my therapist of two years is not necessary, my social worker> > from victim services is not necessary and my sister Joan's> > therapist is not necessary. It seems to me like the final> > verdict has already been decided and again for the victims> > there is no justice.> > >> > >> > > The Court did not proceed on April 29/02. It wasfound by the> > Judge and both attorneys that they did not have an unbiased> > jury toward the defendant and another attempt to find a jury> > in this same town will be made again on May 21/02. This is> > also the home town of my family and I and I asked the Crown> > Attorney, at the beginning of this trial, if it could be held> > in a neutral town to be fair to my family and I. If you have> > read some of the statements in this web site guest book you> > can understand why I made this request. It seems all> > consideration is given for the defendant but none for the> > victims. The R.C.M.P. freely admit that they are in position> > of 3 statements I had given them about the abuse in our family> > when I was a child but for some reason will not make these> > statements available to me or my lawyer. I would like you to> > read thisrequest made of the R.C.M.P. by a local law firm on> > >> > > May 16/01 via fax (279-1871):> > > Royal Canadian Mounted Police> > > Marystown Detachment> > > Marystown, Nfld.> > > Attention: Constable Jackie Remillard> > > Dear Constable Remillard:: Re: Our Client - Mr Byron Prior> > Further to the above and to our various past communications,> > most particularly our letter of February 16/ 01, despite the> > passage of several months we have yet to receive the> > information requested at that time. As it isordinarily a> > straightforward matter to obtain, with that person's consent,> > the statements of a complainant we are at a loss to explain to> > our client why our request has not been answered to date. We> > would, therefore, appreciate your early attention to this> > matter and look forward to the immediate receipt of the> > requested material. Trusting the above to be satisfactory.> > > Yours very truly> > > BUDDEN, MORRIS> > > GEOFFREY E. BUDDEN> > >> > >> > > Questions for John Warr, R.C.M.P. lead investigator who will> > no longer speakwith me personally.> > > 1. Why would you say most of the R.C.M.P. Officers and Doctors> > in my case are retired and you couldn't find them now. Don't> > any of them get a pension? What address is that sent to?> > > 2. Why did you tell two witnesses who volunteered information> > - a lady from Garnish and a man from Fortune, that this case> > would be very messy and they should think very hard before> > volunteering information, you would contact them in a couple> > of days for an appointment. They both changed their minds> > about witnessing.> > > 3. Why didn't you question witnesses whose names you were> > given at the beginning of this case four years ago. People in> > Ontario and people 15 minutesfrom your office. One witness> > #85 & 86 in my guest book on my website and others who have> > telephoned me.> > > 4. Why did you go to a Grand Bank business man, who had no> > information about this case, more than 2 years ago and tell> > him there was a very messy case coming up soon involving my> > family and I. Then immediately after you were transferred and> > only 3 charges laid against one person. 5. Why is the lead> > investigator not a necessary witness in this case? You> > investigated and recommended the charges be laid, you must> > have some information regarding this case.> > > 6. Why in 2 years of your investigation, did you not once> > approach or ask Harriett Prior one question at all?>> > After all these years of reporting to the R.C.M.P. can> > everyone see why I have to inform the public myself. IT'S A> > DISGRACE.> > >> > > On April 19/00 our Prime Minister is in the Middle East> > fighting for Basic Human rights. Here in your own house Mr.> > Prime Minister we need Basic Human Rights also. We are now> > fighting in Afganistan for the rights of abused and persecuted> > people, most of whom are women, please allow my family and I> > some personal rights and dignity here in Canada. If anyone> > requires more info I have statements to Police, names and> > positions of all persons involved and letters from family> > members on what has happened to our dysfunctional family.>> Please contact us at <mailto:byronprior13@aol.com>> > byronprior13@aol.com or call (709) 834-9822 Byron Prior. After> > you view our site please tell your friends and e-mail> > <mailto:pm@pm.gc.ca> pm@pm.gc.ca, or,> > > <mailto:paul@paulmartin.ca> paul@paulmartin.ca and tell him,> > Justice for The Prior family of Grand Bank NFLD. is long past> > due, you need to give them Justice today. Visit their website> > at> > > <http://maxpages.com/sexualabuse>> > http://maxpages.com/sexualabuse I Look forward to living with> > Democracy, Freedom and Justice for my family also, here in> > Canada.> > > For additional informational pages go to the links at the top> > left of our homepage. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,> > >> > > To Whom It May Concern:> > > What I am about to disclose is extrememly painful for me but> > what I'm writing is completely honest to the best of my> > knowledge and recollection. I would like it to be known for> > the record that I have no desire to hurt anyone. All I am> > trying to accomplish is to help my brothers, sisters and> > myself get some closure in their lives; for them and for their> > families. For me, personally, I was and still am very strong.> > I endured nothing in comparision to some of my other siblings.> > I Love my Mother because she is my Mother and she did give me> > life; such as it was. However, there is no LOVE that compares> > with the love I have for my brothers and sisters. Therefore, I> > must tell the Gods honest truth. What I strongly feel for my> > Motherthough is a sense of pity. She is and always has been a> > Manic Depressant. She has taken so many drugs in her lifetime> > that I sometimes wonder if even she realizes the extent of the> > damage she has caused us all.> > > Besides, she never had a chance anyway. Her Mother was a> > diagnoised Manic Depressant and her Father was nothing short> > of a pervert. Uncle Max told me and Suzanne that Grandmother> > was a diagnoised Manic Depressant and her Mother before her. I> > have to wonder what went on in their lives and their home. I> > bet if Moms family were to be honest they would have many a> > story to tell. For me this whole story is regarding abuse.> > Mental, Physical and sexual abuse. Abuse upon ones own> > children. If I waver back and forth from one subject to> > another please barewith me for I am trying to write this as> > it comes to me in all honesty. Of my youth I recall most of> > all is FEAR. Fear of MOM. Fear of life. Fear of Love. Fear of> > being unloved. Fear of not being accepted by my peers. Fear of> > failure. Fear of becomming a whore, a drunk, a drug addict and> > God forbid, the fear of becomming a murderer.> > >> > > By the grace of God I became none of the above. Unfortunately> > for some of my brothers and sisters they have had some> > difficulty dealing with the past and sometimes turned to drugs> > as an escape. But they have all done pretty well to date> > keeping themselves on track. We have no hardened criminals and> > no murderers among us which you may find amazing as the story> > unfolds. Wewere all very strong individuals; we had to be in> > order to survive the ordeal. It has not been an easy road for> > any of us but we made it and maybe we can become a family for> > once in our lives. Maybe we can look each other in the eye> > someday and understand why we did and do the things we do. I> > Love each and everyone of my borthers and sisters so much. We> > all had so much potential if given even half a chance at life.> > Our Mother stole away our chances at life. She played us all> > one against the other from the day we were born. She still> > cont