This sounds like a good question but it would have been better if it had included a definition of just what the mission was/is.

If it means stabilizing the new government, then it’s nowhere near done.

If it is supposed to make the three major religions tolerate each other, it’s another half job.

If success means the United States is a de-facto OPEC member controlling oil, that’s a good going.

This shaky list can go on and on, but the military job has been fully accomplished if the mission was, as I have always believed, revenge by George W. Bush for the threat by Saddam Hussein to assassinate Bush’s father for defeating the Iraqi army in re-taking Kuwait.

Saddam and his two sons were essentially deposited “six-feet under” by the questionable, but convincing reasoning efforts of the younger Bush