The Supreme court has called the recognition of cooperation between the USSR and Germany the rehabilitation of Nazism

The Supreme court has called the recognition of cooperation between the USSR and Germany the rehabilitation of Nazism

02.09.2016

Collegium of the Supreme court of the Russian Federation refused to satisfy the appeal complaint of protection of Vladimir Luzgina, who informed the Perm regional court convicted the justification of Nazism in the article 354.1 criminal code and was sentenced to 200 thousand rubles fine.

photo: Natalia Gubernatorova

Recall that Lusin’s guilt, the court found on the basis of his repost in the social network “Vkontakte” article “15 facts about Bandera, or silent about what the Kremlin.” In it, in particular that of the Soviet Union and Germany cooperated in 1939, during the outbreak of the Second world war, and jointly attacked Flattered. This article was admitted factual inaccuracy, as mentioned, that this is a joint attack came on 1 September 1939, however, the Red army entered the Polish territory only on 17 September.

However, information about this was held to contravene the verdict of the Nuremberg Tribunal and rehabilitating Nazism. Also in the basis of the charges was based on a school certificate Luzgina with the “Quartet” (hence the logic of the court, charged with intentionally falsified the facts), although the defense and argued that in the textbooks on which he was engaged, was told about the cooperation between the USSR and the Third Roach

As the portal “Open Russia”, today, September 1, the day of the start of world war II, the Supreme court upheld the judgement of the Russian sentence, despite the arguments of lawyers Henry Reznik and Irina Fadeeva. Resnick said the Board decision “to discredit the Supreme court.

Note that attorneys are also referred and mistakes during the investigation and examination as the expert, the conclusion of which was built by the prosecution, associateProfessor of historical faculty of the Perm state humanitarian pedagogical University Alexander Vertinsky, said that is irrelevant to the case, although supposedly and was questioned at the stage of investigation.