Okay, so it doesn't really explain why Charlie Hunnam said yes to the role in the first place, but it does explain why he so quickly dropped out of Fifty Shades of Grey.

We had heard he was a little worried about becoming a Showgirls kind of joke if he really got his freak on as Christian Grey, but considering he kept saying how totes cool he was with baring his bondage side we were a little confused.

Now, we think the pieces might be falling into place. Apparently, Charlie was never truly interested in tying anyone up and getting his spank on as an insider revealed:

"Charlie Hunnam was never going to do Fifty Shades of Grey. He told his agents from the beginning he didn't want to do it and was going to pull out."

Say what?!

Then why tease us with the possibility of seeing his sexalicious bod on screen doing all sorts of freaky deaky things??

Some are still claiming his backing out was a scheduling issue as other sources have added:

"The role of Christian Grey requires a massive time commitment, a trilogy role in which Charlie and his team were originally very aware of from the start and a major consideration in his hesitancy for taking the role. Charlie is the lead in a massive TV series and his loyalty will always be to Sons of Anarchy, the SOA family and fans."

We guess we'll just have to hope for more shirtlessness on Sons of Anarchy.

9 comments to “Fifty Shades Of Grey's Charlie Hunnam Might've Taken The Role At First, But He Never Wanted It?!”

He would have been AWESOME! Had no interest in the book until I heard he was going to be in the movie. He would have made the name Christian Grey live on forever, so sad will not get to see him in all his sexiness.

When Kim Bassinger refused to do the girl in the box, after agreeing to it, she got sued big time for lots of money and I think she lost. Wonder if Charlie already signed an agreement stating he would do it and what are the consequences for getting out of it.

I don't see the need to go on about it, if he didn't, he didn't, but I don't understand why he let it be announced that he was going to play the part. I saw what people was saying online, and in magazines and such about how wrong for the role he was, I think that might have been the real reason with him not playing the part. Can't blame him though, cause it would have been another twilight situation, people liking the sick books and hating the movies cause they was complete bogus.

But now, the younger sister of Louis, Félicité Deakin (pictured above, left, with Louis), has figured out her own way to pay tribute to her mother in a very special manner, and we are SO touched by it.

On Friday, the 16-year-old Deakin shared the following image (below), a gorgeous portrait of the family with her late mother, Johannah Deakin, surrounded by all of her children: