doctor jerks off with sand paper. And ties barbed wire around his dick and ***** the chick with the other end of it. and there are 6 people this time instead of three.......oh yeah and they get laxatives injected into them.

None of it holds a candle to A Serbian Film. I'm serious, don't watch it. Unless you're a sick F*** like me. I mean, don't even read about it or watch reviews for it...

But it's also a really, really good movie... if you can stomach what you're watching.

How is it a good movie? Using shocks instead of a decent story is ******* stupid, just like it was with Salo and just like it is now with Human Centipede and Serbian Film.

Human Centipede is trash compared to Salo and A Serbian Film. Salo is arguably one of the more important films of memory. Maybe not in America but it's political connotation got its writer/director assassinated. As for A Serbian Film, it is filmed brilliantly, the soundtrack is phenomenal, and the metaphorical narrative on Serbian government and military involvement with its people is truly palpable.

If you hate it, that's fine. It's truly not for everyone. It's hard to watch. But to immediately dispose of it in the "shock-for-shock-sake" bin is naive.

Human Centipede is trash compared to Salo and A Serbian Film. Salo is arguably one of the more important films of memory. Maybe not in America but it's political connotation got its writer/director assassinated. As for A Serbian Film, it is filmed brilliantly, the soundtrack is phenomenal, and the metaphorical narrative on Serbian government and military involvement with its people is truly palpable.

If you hate it, that's fine. It's truly not for everyone. It's hard to watch. But to immediately dispose of it in the "shock-for-shock-sake" bin is naive.

A father being basically forced to **** his own son in the ass is not metaphorical for anything other than being a sick, twisted human being.

Thank you, Caddy. If you want a good movie that does subtle criticism of governments well, go look at The Lives of Others or The Conversations. Those were masterpieces that didn't go to ridiculous lengths to shock the audience to make a point, they just had beautiful acting and an engaging story.

A father being basically forced to **** his own son in the ass is not metaphorical for anything other than being a sick, twisted human being.

Which is the EXACT thought the writer feels about the Serbian government. It's disgusting, I get it. But to be so uber sensitive over celluloid art is pretty interesting. I'm tremendously less offended by this disgusting obvious fiction than I am by much of what is passed off as legitimate news in our country.

At the same time, I prefaced all I said with "don't watch it, don't read about it, or watch a review about it."

It's not meant for those that get sensitive about what fiction they watch.

Which is the EXACT thought the writer feels about the Serbian government. It's disgusting, I get it. But to be so uber sensitive over celluloid art is pretty interesting. I'm tremendously less offended by this disgusting obvious fiction than I am by much of what is passed off as legitimate news in our country.

Oh please, the vast majority of 'metaphors' that people read into just don't exist. A Serbian Film was crude for the sake of being crude. Also I disagree that it was filmed in a particularly interesting or exciting way.

Which is the EXACT thought the writer feels about the Serbian government. It's disgusting, I get it. But to be so uber sensitive over celluloid art is pretty interesting. I'm tremendously less offended by this disgusting obvious fiction than I am by much of what is passed off as legitimate news in our country.

And that's a ******* stupid way to go about it. There are far better ways to write a movie in such a manner other than using shocks, it's a cheap gimmick and it's for ****** ass writers or directors to make a point and actually getting accepted by pretentious dickheads. I'm not calling you that here phlysac, but I'm just saying it's a stupid premise. Again, go to the examples I listed.

Why did you guys watch it then? Either you didn't watch it and have a strong opinion based on not seeing it, or you watched it absolutely knowing it was supposed to be the most disturbing movie ever made.

Who the hell knows really, I watched some of it and just read a long, long plot summary of it that described it well enough. And I forgot Requiem for a Dream. THAT's a movie that uses shocks in a manner that actually helps make a point.

And that's a ******* stupid way to go about it. There are far better ways to write a movie in such a manner other than using shocks, it's a cheap gimmick and it's for ****** ass writers or directors to make a point and actually getting accepted by pretentious dickheads. I'm not calling you that here phlysac, but I'm just saying it's a stupid premise. Again, go to the examples I listed.

Well Salo is owned by Criterion. So if it's "pretensious" then it's value is observed by one of the most important film companies in the world.

Why did you guys watch it then? Either you didn't watch it and have a strong opinion based on not seeing it, or you watched it absolutely knowing it was supposed to be the most disturbing movie ever made.

I watched it to see what the fuss was about. Then I realised it was just a movie that wanted to shock for the sake of shocking.

Yes, I'm aware of that. It's just, I don't need to see an Italian army rape young boys, then force them to eat ****, then burn off parts of their bodies just to use as an allegory of fascist Italy. You know what would have worked better? An actual insight on the fascism in Italy, not watching scatology and rape with no point to it.