So, Utah decided to just give the homeless places to live. The results are what anyone with sense, or who has followed the topic would expect: Utah’s Housing First program cost between $10,000 and $12,000 per person, about half of the $20,000 it cost to treat and care for homeless people on the street. Imagine [...]

I don’t mean he’s not up the job of being president; I mean he’s not up to the job of being presidentright now. I’m sure he’d have made a fine president some other time, some decade of relative peace and prosperity, where the biggest demand on his capacity was “don’t fuck it up.”

But that is not the time in which we live.

We live in a time of crumbling empire and crumbling sidewalks, of failed wars and a failing economy, of social conservatives versus social justice, of a race between the middle class and the ozone layer to oblivion. We balance precariously on the brink of America and America 2.0, where hard decisions must be made about whether we are going to use our resources to keep giving gold-plated bootstraps to the already-privileged or start reinvesting in our fraying social safety net and brittle bridges.

We don’t need a steward; we need a leader. Not just any leader, either. We need the second coming of FDR. And Obama just isn’t the right guy.

I don’t pretend to know who the right guy, or gal, is—but I know with a clarity that rings like churchbells that it ain’t Obama.

This is correct. It is not racist to say so. It is simply an observation based on a careful evaluation of the data. Melissa could have reached this same conclusion three years ago, and I and thousands of other R&D professionals might still have jobs, but we’ll put that aside for now.

We have a bigger problem. Progressives can still be bamboozled. They still have buttons that are pushable. For example, in the same post, Melissa excerpts a portion of Feingold’s Netroots Nation keynote speech that speaks to the issue of corporations where he says:

“I think it’s a mistake for us to take the argument that they like to make that, ‘Well, what we’re going to do now is, we’re going to take the corporate money like the Republicans do and then after we win, we’ll change it.’ When’s the last time anyone did that? Most people don’t change the rules after they win by them. It doesn’t usually happen. It never happens,” Feingold said. “You know what? I think we’ll lose anyway if we do this. We’ll lose our soul when it comes to the issue of corporate domination.

I happen to agree with Feingold that people who win by taking huge sums of corporate campaign contributions or by bending the rules or cheating do not change the rules after they are elected. That’s why I couldn’t vote for Obama after he didn’t protest the way voters from Florida and Michigan were treated in the 2008 primaries. The process was extremely unfair to them, and by extension the rest of the Clinton voters. But he didn’t lift a finger to protect their votes because to do so meant that he _might_ lose the nomination. It wasn’t in his best interest to do that. It wasn’t that hard to eliminate Obama from my presidential material list based on his attitude towards voters back in February 2008. This is the guy who wrote off Appalachia. A whole swath of the country plagued by generational poverty and rapacious coal companies. Just wrote them off. Don’t need those votes or voters. They can go jump in a slag heap.

Your vote is sacred. Once it can be taken away from you, you have no power. This was more important than any corporate cash in 2008 and progressives missed it because they were misdirected. It wasn’t the money, it was the cheating. Repeat after me: “I will never vote for a politician who approves of nullifying the votes of 6 million people because if I can’t trust him to do the right thing *before* the election, I sure as hell can’t trust him to do it afterwards.”

Same with congressmen and senators and presidents and *superdelegates* who sell themselves to big corporate entities. They aren’t going to make the rules fairer for the rest of us because that might mean they will lose. Don’t expect them to do the right thing after the election if they are willing to sell themselves for big corporate donations before the election.

The only way to change this dynamic is to change the rule makers. You need to vote out the people who are whoring themselves for corporations and *particularly* the finance industry. Don’t say it can’t be done because you don’t have a choice. You must find a way.

But there is a degree of misdirection that progressives are prone to following to their detriment. What Feingold is doing is highlighting the evil heart of every corporation. Corporations are the problem, he seems to say. Bullshit. That’s like blaming the candy for being sweet. Corporations exist for a reason. It’s very hard for some industries to operate in any other way than a corporation. Let’s not act like children who don’t understand the concept of the corporation. They can’t be eliminated without harming our economy.

But they can be reined in. There’s no reason in the world why we should let them get away with murder. In fact, we’d be doing them a favor if we weren’t so permissive. Corporations are out of control right now eating everything in sight like a plague of locusts. They’re self-destructive. Pretty soon, they’re going to run out of things to eat and we will all suffer, MBAs and shareholders alike.

We used to have rules to make sure corporations didn’t have the upper hand in every interaction with their employees. We need to bring them back. We used to make sure they couldn’t offshore their profits to avoid taxes. We need to reinstitute them. You probably can’t do anything about the Citizens United ruling until one of the more conservative justices dies but for all we know, Sotomayor and Kagan aren’t a whole lot better. They just haven’t had a case to demonstrate how bad they are. You have to wonder why Bader-Ginsburg doesn’t retire so she can be replaced while there is still a Democrat in the White House. But she’s the last truly liberal justice on the court. When she’s gone, Obama may very well appoint a stealth justice. After all, who is really pulling his strings right now?

So, Feingold’s remarks are both right and irrelevant. This is the environment you operate in. Some American industries need a corporate model. Corporations pay obscene gobs of cash to easy congressional representatives and Senators who will write rules that are favorable to them. If you want to make the rules fairer, don’t get mad at the corporations. That’s not leading with your head and right now, you need to be cool and detached from the emotional string pulling crap. The corporations are not the ones who can change the rules. You need to go after the rule makers. You need to primary some incumbents with strong primary opponents. Use the money you would have donated to the Democratic party and feed it to people who wouldn’t be able to run in a party primary without kowtowing to the party line. Don’t donate to Act Blue or the DCCC or DSCC or what ever D org is calling you this week. You need to set up a separate funding mechanism that is outside of the Democratic party’s control or influence and recruit your own candidates. You need to become the progressive equivalent of the Christian Coalition.

To become really successful, you will have to reunite with the part of the party you willingly jettisoned for Obama in 2008. Make up with the working class voters of all educational backgrounds, the unions and women of all ages. You might have to abandon the creative class arrogance and the knee jerk responses to anything that isn’t crunchy granola. The good thing is that there are plenty of liberal values that you *can* agree on, especially when it comes to the economy. Stick to them and you can win. (I think Katiebird has four simple phrases that represent values that will work, where the heck are they…?)

The beast you have to starve is the party. Yeah, they’ll still get their money from corporations but you can drop your money in a different pile. And if other people do it and they tell two people and so on and so on, the pile of cash will get bigger and bigger and pretty soon, you can replace the rulemakers with people who vote for your interests and not some corporation’s.

The question is, do progressives have the balls to do it? Because from what I can see, the problem is not a lack of cash, it’s a lack of courage.

*************************

Here is Katiebird’s 12 Word Platform:

1. Medicare For All.
2. End The Wars.
3. Tax The Rich.
4. Jobs for Everyone

Body: This paper, or pre-draft, or sketch, or whatever it is, started out with this title: "With The 12-Point Platform, this won't happen: An aristocracy of credentialism in the 20%." But then I realized I'd gotten in deeper than I thought -- one of those posts were the framework and the notes overwhelm the original idea -- and as it tur […]

This is a big bunch of catch-up, here, 'cause it's been a helluva few weeks. Gaius Publius interviewed Alan Grayson on Virtually Speaking, where Grayson discussed "how he 'cracked the nut' that allows him to get progressive legislation passed. Part of his secret - his goal is to be a person who 'gets things done for the progress […]