In message <3b3f27c61003091615v35532a30xc24cf282e7e69599@mail.gmail.com>, Natha
n Beyer writes:
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Mark Hindess
> wrote:
> >
> > In message <4B965407.8000609@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
> >>
> >> I appreciate sebb's review and comments. It would have been good
> >> to hear them during the two week freeze leading up to the vote
> >> rather than after the vote was concluded :-)
> >
> > This comment isn't entirely fair. Sebb's initial review comments
> > were about the binaries which we only created after the release was
> > "completed". This is one reason why I had more sympathy for his
> > view that the release should be cancelled.
> >
> > I also appreciate sebb's comments. So, while he could have made them
> > by building our source and reviewing the resulting binaries, perhaps
> > we should attempt to make this kind of review easier?
>
> Don't we have binary builds coming out of Hudson periodically?
Indeed. Though they are built from svn directly rather than from svn
via source artifacts, so I worry we'd miss something that would affect
the release.
-Mark.