<p>Ok. Can you plan this meetup and make it happen? Probably several meetings, to accommodate different people's schedules. Maybe the policy wonks can help.</p>
<p>I personally have already put a ton of time and energy into this problem. I am happy to participate in a continuing discussion about it. My experience with the issue to date is that, when I bring it up, people are reluctantly willing to talk about it because they agree that it's important. As SOON as I stop forcing the issue, take the pressure off, and make it socially acceptable to ignore the issue, we do. It's way more easy and comfortable.</p>

<p>So.</p>
<p>I think this issue is important, but I have played ringleader the amount that I feel comfortable, and have put an interim solution in place. I am still dealing with social fallout from what I have already done.</p>
<p>If you have some ideas for further solutions, please implement them. I'll help. Others no doubt also will. Lots of us think this idea is important. We are all looking to each other for leadership. Don't make me drive the bus *again*.</p>

If anyone has any specific alterations they'd like to suggest or make to how harassment is defined on the wiki, that's awesome. Praveen, you said you liked something explicit about communicating that you found in your example? Can you pull out the relevant section? I can help you reduce it to something more succinct if you want help figuring out how to do that. I know you know how to edit the wiki page yourself.</blockquote>

<div><br>I think this topic is worth having an actual physical meetup across the many noisebridge genders to kick around ideas and relay experiences. I brought up the poly code because it's sex positive and anti-harrasment. I'm sure if we put a few bright noisebridge minds together we can come up with something totally anarchic but also totally functional at the same time.<br>