London residents were left
scratching their heads last night as a mysterious pink
cloud drifted over the city. Bemused bystanders in Mayfair
craned their necks to witness the strange alien-like cloud
that appeared for just under an hour at around 8:30 pm. It
hovered over buildings before breaking up and slowly
disappearing. But after dismissing theories of UFOs and
atmospheric phenomenons, the Met Office said the blob was
likely to be nothing more than the lights of the city
reflected in a cloud.

If this were, as the Met Office speculated, merely the lights of
the city reflected off the clouds, then why don't more cities
experience pink clouds at night? Don't all cities have lights,
and frequently have cloud cover? The Zetas explained it this
way.

ZetaTalkExplanation
10/25/2008: This has been explained
away by the authorities as a reflection of city lights on a
high cloud. But don't high clouds and city lights occur often,
around the world? We have stated in the past that occasional
neon clouds or light pillars were due to atmospheric changes
from the tail of Planet X. Light pillars were flames of gas in
the atmosphere, quickly burning out. Neon clouds are not seen
at night, as they are highly reflective of sunlight primarily
during dawn or dusk. This is not due to water vapor
reflections, such as rainbows, but other chemicals in the
atmosphere. This recent pink cloud over London was similar to
a neon cloud, but was reflecting the lights from the city, as
explained in the article. However, this would not be occurring
without chemicals from the tail of Planet X mixing into the
atmosphere. Such displays will become more common.

Neon clouds have been around since 2003, when Planet X arrived
in the inner solar system and wafted its tail past the Earth
when it put on the brakes as it neared the Sun. The Zetas
predicted in 2005 that such displays would continue.

ZetaTalkPrediction12/11/2005: In 2003, there was a period of
electrical surges and outages, affecting countries worldwide.
This could return, as it is the charged tail that caused this.
Neon clouds, red colored and seemingly lit, were seen at that
time, and these and other atmospheric displays will be
produced.

The issue next arose when the SpaceWeather.com site reported
what appeared to be an exploding comet, increasing in size.

The Zetas explained that this was merely a bending of light rays
as the rays from the comet passed through the Earth's
atmosphere. Once again, chemicals in the atmosphere from the
tail of Planet X were to blame.

ZetaTalkExplanation
10/27/2007: The mystery exists only
because the scientists are not acknowledging the factors at
play. What is new and not being considered? We have stated
repeatedly that the tail of Planet X has returned. It hoses
out from the N Pole of Planet X, which is increasingly
pointing toward Earth. This tail is immense, and wafts afar.
Fine red dust has been deposited on Earth from 2003 to the
present because the tail was wafting past Earth. Fireballs and
meteors are on the increase for the same reason. The
atmosphere of Earth has been affected so that Sun halos or
Moon halos appear, and odd red neon clouds appear. The
descriptions of the comet's increase in size include
describing the comet as "yellow", with a "buttery glow", which
is a way of stating the presence of light rays in the
orange/red spectrum. It is not that the comet itself is
emitting these rays in excess, it is that the other rays are
being deflected by the dust cloud so the percentage of rays in
the orange/red spectrum begin to dominate.

Then during January, 2008 reports of light towers flooded the
internet. These light towers were filmed in Iraq by soldiers on
patrol, and in Germany and Canada. Once again, chemicals from
the tail of Planet X were responsible, per the Zetas.

ZetaTalkLight
Towers1/24/2008: It has been only
during the past couple years, since the arrival of Planet X
into the inner solar system, that Moon halos have been noted,
or odd neon clouds. More such light towers can be anticipated,
but beyond this, more effects from the tail of Planet X can be
anticipated as the tail components increase in density in the
atmosphere of Earth. What these effects will be we will not
say, as we prefer to have the establishment caught off guard
so that the cover-up stumbles and the public learns the truth.
The establishment knows what is coming, but is keeping the
truth from the public, who like the elite have a right to
know.

In keeping with the Zeta's desire to have the establishment
thrown off balance and forced to admit the presence of Planet X
in the vicinity, neon clouds have again appeared as a surprise.
And per the Zeta prediction, these will become more common.

Lean to the Left

In describing what contortions the Earth will go through during
the passage of Planet X, the Zetas have referred to a "lean to
the left". Planet X itself is going through contortions as it
aligns with the Sun's magnetic field. As Planet X contorts, the
Earth is forced to contort. Prior to the pole shift itself
several steps in the magnetic dance occur.

Daily tugging on the magnetized Atlantic Rift. This began in
2003.

An Earth wobble caused by pushing and pulling on the N and S
poles. This began in 2004.

A lean to the left as the N Pole of Planet X hoses toward
Earth. This may have just recently begun.

3 days of darkness and 6 days of sunrise west when this
becomes extreme.

A grip on the Atlantic Rift causing rotation stoppage.

The pole shift itself.

The Earth wobble was noticed in the spring
of 2004 and was periodically documented by a worldwide
team. By January, 2005 the team's reports began to show that the
geographic N Pole of Earth was tracing a Figure 8, and this
pattern continued through February,
2008 when the last measurements were taken. Recently
something changed and I suspected the "lean to the left" may
have begun. What is the "lean to the left"?

ZetaTalkPrediction1/2/2005: The Figure 8 will become more
extreme and vicious as the N. Pole of Planet X turns in place
in a clockwise motion. What will this increased intensity do
to the Figure 8 and Earth's attempts to simultaneously honor
the Sun's magnetic dictates? She will lay on her side, her
magnetic N. Pole pushed to the west, a predecessor to the 3
Days of Darkness and sunrise west. She will lay her
hemispheres out for an equal basking under the Sun but putting
the Sun and Moon and especially the constellations in
extremely errant positions, especially as the Figure 8
continues during this time.

The Zetas had consistently refused to assign a date to
the start of the "lean to the left", or describe its duration.
This is in keeping with the Zeta insistence that all visitors to
Earth are not allowed to reveal the date of the pole shift. The
Zetas have only indicated the sequence of events. They hint that
a distinct "lean to the left" will be accompanied by
sightings of Planet X to the right of the Sun, and that the
wobble will likewise be alerting the public to the presence of
Planet X when the "lean to the left" is noticed.

ZetaTalkPrediction4/3/2006: Earth scuttles back in her
stalled orbit, Planet X is seen to the right of the Sun, and
increasingly coming closer and appearing larger and
unmistakably not as a solar flare or sundog, and the Earth
falls to her side, little by little. This makes for a lopsided
arc of the Sun across the sky during the day, the Sun not
where expected. Planet X has a steadily stronger grip on the
Atlantic Rift and the poles, creating a stronger and more
violent wobble. This equates to stronger quakes and volcanic
activity, wilder weather, and the populace starting to
question matters in a shrill, not polite, manner. If this is
global warming, what is that to the right of the Sun, and why
is the Earth falling to her side?

ZetaTalkPrediction11/17/2007: At some point the wobble will
merge into a lean to the left, but the wobble will already
have alerted the public by that time. In addition to an
obvious wobble, the lean to the left will be a certain sign.
This will occur weeks before the pole shift, enough time to
escape to safe locations before travel restrictions are
imposed. If a distinct lean to the left occurs, this will not
mean a long delay or a plateau. We have stated that from the
lean to the left to the hour of the pole shift will encompass
no more than 4 months, the length of a magnetic trimester, and
will occur within that trimester.

The "lean to the left" means that the Earth will begin to point
her N Pole toward the east, as Planet X is approaching from the
west in its retrograde orbit and hosing magnetic particles
toward the Earth from its N Pole. As mankind looks out toward
the Sun from the northern hemisphere, the N Pole would "lean to
the left", with Planet X coming at the Earth from the right hand
side.

But how does one know that a distinct "lean to the
left" is occurring? For the Earth to "fall on her side", the
Moon might be attempting to orbit over the poles, rather than
around the Equator. Normally, the Sun is to the south when
viewed from the northern hemisphere, and to the north when
viewed from the southern hemisphere. If the Earth were to "fall
on her side", the Sun at noon would be directly overhead,
regardless of Earth location. We're not there yet. But are we
seeing the start of this trend? The Zetas hinted over a year ago
that the "lean to the left" might start soon.

ZetaTalkExplanation6/12/2007: The Winterbourne, May 23, 2007
crop circle indicates a return to the wobble and lurch and a
lean to the left to start, with a vengeance. Imagine Earth in
the center of this Winterbourne circle, being battered back
and forth between two opposing magnetic fields! The Sun is
dominant, with its N Pole pole pointing up. Planet X is next
dominant, and will be pointing its N Pole out toward Earth.
The poor Earth, who swings her N and S poles around daily to
present to the Sun and Planet X, will attempt to please both
masters.

I took some personal measurements and asked some trusted
teammates to take the Sun's measure too. The early reports
indicate that the Figure 8
wobble is continuing. The early reports also hinted that
the "lean to the left" may have started. This is a confusing
picture, but the key point is this: during the wobble, the entire
globe moves such that the Sun is viewed as being too far
south or too far north. Both hemispheres experience the same
tipping away or tipping forward of the N Pole, and to the same
degree. As an example of a matching reading confirming the globe
moving as a whole is this measure taken during November
15-19, 2007. A sunset in Madrid showed the Sun to be 31°
too far north at 5:45 pm, when Santiago, Chile (some 4 time
zones behind Madrid) showed the Sun to be at 38° too far north
at noon, at 12:27 pm. This was taken to be confirmation of both
these readings.

For the northern and southern hemispheres to experience a divergent
position of the Sun, at essentially the same time, does not fit
this picture. The Sun would not move or remain too far north
for the northern hemisphere while the Sun moved or remained too
far to the south for the southern hemisphere. Yet this
divergence is what the new data seemed to reveal. A recent
October 29, 2008 sunset reading at 8:00 pm from Santiago, Chile
had the Sun too far to the south by 23 degrees. During
this same day the Sun was found to be distinctly high in
the dome during both the morning and afternoon in
Baraboo, Wisconsin, by some 18 degrees. Santiago and Baraboo are
2 time zones apart, giving these readings a little more than a 3
hour difference in time. Could Santiago find the Sun too far to
the south while Wisconsin found the Sun too high up in the dome
toward the north, so close in time? This could happen if a "lean
to the left" were in play, as in this case the Sun is more
directly overhead for all latitudes, in both hemispheres.

Santiago, Chile is at a latitude of 29° from the Equator. Where
sunset in Santiago is supposed to be at azimuth 253 deg, this is
very close to a directly west reading of 270 deg, a difference
of only 17° vs Santiago's location of 29° from the equator.
Thus, if the Sun were more directly overhead over Santiago the
Sun would appear to be too far to the south. Baraboo,
Wisconsin has a latitude of 43 deg, halfway to the N Pole. At
2:30 pm in the afternoon in late October, when the Sun should be
low in the sky, with a combined azimuth/altitude of 218°, the
Sun is supposed to be below Baraboo's latitude by many, many
degrees. Late afternoon measures in the past taken at 4:30 pm
have shown the Sun too far to the south, due to the wobble, but
the recent measures taken at 2:30 pm showed the Sun too far to
the north by 18°. If the "lean to the left" had begun with the
Sun more directly overhead, the Sun would indeed appear to be
too far north, too high up in the dome, in Wisconsin.
For these two divergent readings to take place close
in time hinted that the "lean to the left" may have begun. I was
beginning to become concerned. Was it time to prepare for the
last weeks?

But an additional reading from Scranton, PA reassured me that
the "lean to the left" had not yet begun, but that instead the
wobble appeared to be strongly in place or perhaps worsening.
The contributor located in Scranton found during a sunset
reading on October 30, 2008 at 5:35 pm that the Sun appeared to
be 30° further south than expected. This reading is
closer in time to the 8:00 pm sunset reading in Santiago, Chile,
which had a 23° south reading on October 29, 2008.
Both hemispheres were moving in the same direction, in a strong
wobble, but with no evidence of a "lean to the left".

For those willing to take measurements - which include date,
time, location, and measurements of where the Sun is observed
including altitude and azimuth - send your observations to nancy@zetatalk.com.
Altitude is a measure of where the Sun appears between the
horizon and the top of the dome, with 0° being the horizon and
90° being the top of the dome. Azimuth is the measure of where
the Sun appears to be in the 360° circle around the horizon,
where dead north is 0°, dead south is 180°, east is 90° and west
is 270°. During this measure, it is best to use a direction
guide such as a survey showing N/S or a street known to be
running N/S or E/W, as the compass may be erratic.

Double Whammy

Starting in March, 2003 a pattern of global shuddering was
recorded on the live
seismographs maintained by the USGS. What was striking,
and new, was that the shuddering effect occurred twice
a day, appearing first on May 26,
2003. This twice a day shuddering occurred when the
Altantic Rift lined up facing the Sun (0:00 UTC) or when the
Atlantic Rift was in opposition to the Sun (12:00 UTC) on the
other side of the globe. Per the Zetas, this was caused by the
newly arrived Planet X grabbing at the Atlantic Rift, which is a
surface magnet due to all the new lava that has hardened in the
rift. Universal Time (UTC) or Greenwich time is centered between
that portion of the Atlantic Rift that swings from Iceland
thence between Europe and the US, and that portion of the
Atlantic Rift that swings east between S America and Africa. The
Atlantic Rift forms a giant "S" shape as it wends its way
between the continents. The Zetas explain that this tugging
began because magnets like to stay in alignment, and when the
globe turns to place the Atlantic Rift into a bow shape at the
side, this is not considered being in alignment.

ZetaTalkExplanation7/17/2004:At the point where the Atlantic
Rift either faces or is in opposition to Planet X, this
tugging to align occurs, creating the global quakes noted on
live seismographs only during this past year, for the Earth,
when Planet X has been in the vicinity.

The double whammy is still with us. On October 29, 2008 a
dramatic example of this occurred. Note that once again the
global shuddering has occurred at approximately 0:00 UTC and
12:00 UTC.