A collection of observations, news and resources on the changing nature of innovation, technology, leadership, and other subjects.

May 28, 2018

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) may well be the quintessential symbol of our AI/robotics age.Cars are a major part of our daily lives.A self-driven car is a concept that requires little explanation, something we can all quickly grasp.It wasn’t that long ago that the notion on an AV driving us around while we read or sleep would have felt like the stuff of science fiction. Having experimental AVs coursing through public roads in Silicon Valley, Pittsburgh and Phoenix is concrete evidence that our smart machines are achieving human-like intelligence, raising a number of important questions:how long before AVs are all around us?; how will they impact our lives?; what unintended consequences might we have to deal with?; and what should be done to ensure that they arrive as safely and smoothly as possible?

These are among the questions addressed in the March 1 issue of The Economist, which includes a comprehensive special report on autonomous vehicles with seven articles on the subject.The special report starts out with the assumption that whatever technological hurdles lie in their way will be eventually overcome.But there are wider economic, social and public policy issues to be explored, starting with: what can we learn from the transition to horseless carriages in the 20th century that can now be applied to the transition to driverless cars?

May 21, 2018

Will there be enough work in the future?What’s the likely impact of our continuing technology advances on jobs?How will they impact productivity?These are all-important questions to reflect on as our increasingly smart technologies are now being applied to activities that not long ago were viewed as the exclusive domain of humans.

While no one really knows the answer to these questions, most studies of the subject have concluded that relatively few occupations, 10% or less, will be entirely automated and disappear over the next 10 - 15 years.Instead, a growing percentage of occupations will significantly change as technologies automate the more routines tasks within those occupations.People will still be involved, but their jobs will be transformed by the advanced tools they now have to master.Moreover, a growing technology-based economy will likely create all kinds of new occupations, which will more than offset declines in occupations displaced by automation, - as has been the case over the past couple of centuries.

One would also expect that technology advances will increase the productivity of the workers involved in these new or transformed occupations.But, if we look at the past 10-15 for guidance, we’ll find that productivity growth has significantly declined over this timeframe, notwithstanding huge technology advances like smartphones, cloud computing, big data and artificial intelligence.Economist have proposed competing explanations for the declining productivity growth, but have so far failed to reach consensus.Understanding this productivity puzzle may well hold the key to future productivity improvements and long-term economic growth.

May 14, 2018

Looking back upon my long career, one of the major factors shaping my views of strategy and innovation are the powerful transformational forces that I saw buffeting the IT industry over much of that time.It’s frankly sobering how many once powerful IT companies are no longer around or are shadows of their former selves.The carnage might be more pronounced in the fast-changing IT industry, but no industry has been immune. It’s all part of what Joseph Schumpeter called creative destruction over 75 years ago, - “the process of industrial mutation that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one.”

For a startup a transformative innovation is all upside, an opportunity to take-on established companies with new products that offer significantly better capabilities and/or lower costs. Startups hope that their compelling new offerings will help them establish a foothold in the marketplace and, over time, become leaders in their industry.

But change is often difficult for established companies.Over the years, they’ve amassed a number of valuable assets and extensive organizations. Already consumed with managing their existing operations, - e.g., products and services; supply chain and channel partners; sales and marketing; revenues, profits and cash; - they may see a transformative innovation as more of a threat or distraction than an opportunity.

May 07, 2018

I recently participated in a blockchain panel at a conference of senior supply chain executives from a variety of companies. I welcomed the opportunity to learn how these real-world executives feel about blockchain, as well as how to best communicate the promise and current state of this emerging and potentially transformative technology.Let me share a few of my observations.

Before our panel started, the executives were asked how they viewed blockchain.In general, they felt that there was too much hype surrounding blockchain, were skeptical about its value to supply chain systems, but expressed a wait-and-see attitude.They were then asked how many were conducting blockchain prototypes in their companies.The majority raised their hands.

I thought that their views and subsequent questions and comments during the panel succinctly captures the current state of blockchain in the business world: skeptical, turned off by the hype, but hedging their bets by getting on the learning curve with prototypes and experimentation.

The moderator first asked each panelist to address the audience’s skepticism about blockchain.What, in our opinion, is the key value of blockchain?I said that I look at the value of blockchain through two complementary lenses:enhancing the security of the Internet, and reducing the inefficiencies and overheads in applications, like supply chains, involving multiple institutions.