3. Does the document have an “About This Document” section which allows the end user to get an overview of the state of the document?

answer 3

4. How completely does the release address the goal of the project? Is the overall document complete in structure and organization? Are any missing or incomplete sections critical enough to keep the document at an Alpha quality level?

answer 4

Stable Level

5. Have all the Beta Reviewer Action Items been completed? These will need to be completed if they have not already occurred during a previous assessment.

answer 5

6. Have any limitations been documented? Please point out the link(s).

answer 6

7. Does the document substantially address the application security issues it was created to solve?

9. Have you noted any limitations of the document that are not already documented by the project release lead?

answer 9

10. Would you consider using this document in your day to day work assuming your professional work includes a reason to use this document? Would you recommend this document to others in the profession? Why or why not?

answer 10

11. What, if anything, is missing which would make this a more useful document? Is what is missing critical enough to keep the release at a beta quality?

answer 11

Second Reviewer

Second Reviewer

It is recommended that an OWASP board member or Global Projects Committee member be the second reviewer on Quality releases. The board has the initial option to review the project, followed by the Global Projects Committee.

3. Does the document have an “About This Document” section which allows the end user to get an overview of the state of the document?

answer 3

4. How completely does the release address the goal of the project? Is the overall document complete in structure and organization? Are any missing or incomplete sections critical enough to keep the document at an Alpha quality level?

answer 4

Stable Level

5. Have all the Beta Reviewer Action Items been completed? These will need to be completed if they have not already occurred during a previous assessment.

answer 5

6. Have any limitations been documented? Please point out the link(s).

answer 6

7. Does the document substantially address the application security issues it was created to solve?

9. Have you noted any limitations of the document that are not already documented by the project release lead?

answer 9

10. Would you consider using this document in your day to day work assuming your professional work includes a reason to use this document? Would you recommend this document to others in the profession? Why or why not?

answer 10

11. What, if anything, is missing which would make this a more useful document? Is what is missing critical enough to keep the release at a beta quality?

answer 11

Third Reviewer

Third Reviewer

It is recommended that an OWASP board member or Global Projects Committee member be the second reviewer on Quality releases. The board has the initial option to review the project, followed by the Global Projects Committee.

3. Does the document have an “About This Document” section which allows the end user to get an overview of the state of the document?

answer 3

4. How completely does the release address the goal of the project? Is the overall document complete in structure and organization? Are any missing or incomplete sections critical enough to keep the document at an Alpha quality level?

answer 4

Stable Level

5. Have all the Beta Reviewer Action Items been completed? These will need to be completed if they have not already occurred during a previous assessment.

answer 5

6. Have any limitations been documented? Please point out the link(s).

answer 6

7. Does the document substantially address the application security issues it was created to solve?

9. Have you noted any limitations of the document that are not already documented by the project release lead?

answer 9

10. Would you consider using this document in your day to day work assuming your professional work includes a reason to use this document? Would you recommend this document to others in the profession? Why or why not?

answer 10

11. What, if anything, is missing which would make this a more useful document? Is what is missing critical enough to keep the release at a beta quality?