Seems the 2400G ought be able to play last-gen console games at 1080p consistently at 60FPS with stock clocks. I'm sure it can play well-ported current-gen games at 1080p @ 30FPS. For the cost and wattage of that chip, that's honestly pretty good.

Seems the 2400G ought be able to play last-gen console games at 1080p consistently at 60FPS with stock clocks. I'm sure it can play well-ported current-gen games at 1080p @ 30FPS. For the cost and wattage of that chip, that's honestly pretty good.

Click to expand...

My Kaveri surprised me. I can play a lot of older games at 1080p and 60 FPS, this should have a good amount of power behind it, not to mention a pretty kickass CPU bundle.

Because the 2200G has better clocks than the 1300X, is as cheap as the 1200 and has a gpu in it, but half the L3-Cache, which isnt that bad.
Same with the 2400G, better clocks than the 1500X, but is as cheap as the 1400.

Just looking at the specs ( have touched neither yet...) i would guess that intel i7-8705g will beat the amd 2400g quite soundly, which leads me to believe that amd still has some more apu magic up their sleeve. i cannot imagine them selling intel the means to decimate a whole product line...

From the early benchmarks i saw for the new processor Ryzen 5 2400G , its not worth it unless you really need the integrated graphics. The Ryzen 5 1600 which is about the same price is much faster for multitasking (+37% multi-core speed) which makes a big difference. I already own a graphics card like most people and dont ever plan on buying integrated graphics. Everyone knows that what is integrated is usually slower and cheaper. I am pretty sure it also slows down the overall computer processing. The integrated graphics are from Radeon and we also know that Nvidia cards are better (look at the top graphics cards in the benchmarks if you dont believe me). Unless you absolutely need integrated graphics and dont have a good graphics card or cant afford to get one and dont play games , you better get a processor from the first series of Ryzen 5 or better or something else than the G series and get a good graphics card. An article i saw was saying that the Ryzen 7 2000 series wont even have integrated graphics because high-end users use their own graphics card due to a better performance.I think this says it all. Why would you pay a huge price on a processor to use cheap integrated graphics... Get yourself a good graphics card (Geforce GTX 1050-1060 or better) and a better processor instead than those G series if you plan on doing any gaming. Like we always say , you get what you pay for. When you try so save a bit of money. you often end up losing alot on quality. I did the mistake when buying the Ryzen 3. They are very slow at multi-tasking and i ended up buying a Ryzen 5 1600 instead. I had alot problems with the Ryzen 3 making my computer run slow as soon i was starting to open a few windows and having a few software or browsers running at the same time. The 2400G should have the same problem and i dont recommend it.