Tuesday, March 10, 2015

REPLY TO COMMENT

MY REPLY TO COMMENTS POSTED ON ANOTHER FORUM

Thank you for your comments and the various links to
information that you believe may support your comments. I appreciate the time
and thought you have expended on this. It will take me a while to check out all
of the links and comment on them if appropriate, but in the meantime, there are
some points of confusion in your comments that I will try to clear up.

In
regard to the Platonic hypothesis that an infinitely logical reality underlies
the universe we perceive and is reflected by the structure of pure mathematics,
you state that you are not a pure Aristotelian, but that it does not mean that
you are ‘Platonian’. You continue: “also not in Ed's
meaning (and belief apparently that you can invent arbitrarily mathematical
equations and think they apply to nature),” … You make a huge leap here. I certainly
do not believe that I, or anyone else, can arbitrarily invent equations. The logic
of reality and mathematical structure are there to be discovered and explored.
This speaks to the general confusion in science that is cleared up by TDVP, and
answers Leibniz’s all-important question: “Why is there something instead of
nothing?”

Conditions created by experimental
physicists in the LHC and other particle colliders, blast natural atomic and sub-atomic
structures apart to produce the high-energy particle zoo. They then claim that they
have created conditions that mimic the conditions at the ‘big bang’ point of
origin of the universe. They of course have done no such thing, in fact, it’s
quite the opposite, but it sounds impressive and, along with the potential for
creating weapons of mass destruction, it gets them megabucks funding.

TDVP models what actually goes on in the
universe. Particles like the other 10 quarks, bosons, gluons, etc., created in
LHC experiments quickly decay into up-and down-quarks, electrons and photons,
and/or recombine to form the natural elements and ions that exist at normal conditions
on the surface of the Earth. The real question is: why don’t they keep decaying
in accordance with the second law of thermodynamics, all the way to maximum
entropy? It’s because the presence of the third form, which Vernon and I have
named ‘gimmel’, guided through the nine-dimensional domain in a completely
logical, mathematical manner by the C substrate, expressed by the Conveyance
Equations, forms stable protons and neutrons, and consequently, atomic and
molecular stability.