Darpa recently launched a program called Methods for Explosive Detection at Standoff, or MEDS. The agency wants companies to “rapidly develop and demonstrate non-contact methods to detect explosives embedded or packaged in opaque media with high water content (e.g., mud, meat, animal carcasses)” using ultra-wideband microwaves, that “have shown promise for breast cancer detection,” according to a project solicitation.

In recent years, breast cancer researchers have had success using ultra-wideband, or UWB, to detect malignant tumors in breast cancer patients. It’s complicated, but involves zapping tissue at close range with signals from across the radio spectrum, at much wider range than conventional X-rays. To oversimplify it, the UWB waves bounce back and highlight healthy tissue while contrasting it with a darker-colored malignant tissue. If it’s possible to detect a tiny tumor with it, then it stands to reason that it may be possible to detect explosives hidden inside some wet mud or even a dead dog. (It happens.)

And it won’t be easy to build ultra-wideband detectors. A recent declassified NATO report (.pdf) on work with UWB bomb detectors was optimistic about method, but clutter like rocks and other debris “degrade[d] the signal to clutter ratio and reduce[d] the system performance.” Handheld UWB detectors, such as the Army’s Minehound scanner, were also limited by a single pair of antennae and — with few exceptions — couldn’t draw an image of what they saw.

Darpa’s MEDS program isn’t requiring its detectors to use imaging — it really wants something that can simply pinpoint a buried bomb — but considers the option “desirable, if feasible.” The agency doesn’t specify if the devices will be handheld or carried by vehicles or robots. Regardless, the devices will have to get pretty close to the ground for an antenna to pick up a signal, as the NATO report considered the range on potential systems to max out around 20 to 30 centimeters “in ideal conditions.”

The program also points toward other “potentially relevant areas” such as non-linear acoustics — distorted sound waves, basically — and “mixed modality mechanisms” like electron-photon beams. What Darpa doesn’t want are devices that use X-rays “with the possible exception of X-ray backscatter,” due to the risk of contamination. One thing about finding tumors: you don’t want to poison your patient as you search, as any doctor could tell Darpa.

Here’s The Thing With Ad Blockers

We get it: Ads aren’t what you’re here for. But ads help us keep the lights on. So, add us to your ad blocker’s whitelist or pay $1 per week for an ad-free version of WIRED. Either way, you are supporting our journalism. We’d really appreciate it.