This blog addresses the fatal flaw at the core of capitalism as a system of human psycho-socio-political-economic collective self-reproduction, a flaw which ultimately renders it a self-DIS-organizing, self-destroying system -- as is becoming increasingly evident. It also details the successor system to capitalism, the new system that represents the higher, positive way forward for humanity: Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY, or EQUITISM.

Monday, October 17, 2016

It is my pleasure to share with you, from time
to time, selections from the seminal sayings, and writings, shared by him among
we of F.E.D., by our co-founder, Karl Seldon [main site: www.dialectics.org].

Such is the following --

“Growth of social
[re-]productive force resolves, locally, into increased productivity,
e.g., as increased rate of output of a particular, [social-reproductively-]use-valuable
product, per unit of human labor-time input.”

“Growth of social productive force, as a cause of
human-societal change [change of social relations of social reproduction] has
dual opposing effects; opposite,
but unequal reactions.”

“One of these two joint effects -- increase in the magnitude
of “relative surplus-value” [Marx] produced [as an increment of profitability],
augments potential net return on capital invested; augments ‘capital[-value]
productivity’.”

“The other of these two joint effects -- technological
obsolescence depreciation, and/or decreased replacement cost depreciation,
of the historical cost/original
cost/sunk
value of “invested” capital equipment, which are both instances of
productive-force-increase-induced capital-equipment depreciation -- augments,
in a competitive context, write-offs of part or all of the historical cost/value of so-depreciated
capital equipment, write-offs that accrue to losses, and that net out against
gross income gains, typically also, in part, induced by productive force
increase [increased “relative surplus-value production”].”

“This second-mentioned effect is weaker than the
first-mentioned effect, in terms of its impact on capital[-value] accumulation,
in the earlier history of capitalist development.

As you can imagine, the exposure to this depreciation effect
is relatively small when workers use hand tools, rather than machines, in
production.”

“This dominance of the first effect over the second effect
creates, shapes, and defines the ‘‘‘ascendance phase’’’ of the
capital-relation-dominated epoch of human [pre-]history, and largely coincides
with the epoch of the ‘‘‘formal subsumption of labor under capital’’’ [Marx].”

“The second effect becomes stronger than the first effect,
in terms of its impact on capital[-value] accumulation, later in the history of
capitalist development, as the core reaches of ruling-class owned concentrated
industrial capital become dominated by heavy fixed capital plant and equipment
-- by the accumulation of capital-value in the form of “fixed-capital” value.”

“This dominance of the second effect over the first effect,
and the ruling class response to their growing perception of it -- which
arrives far earlier in the core ruling class than does the perception of this
effect among the working classes -- creates, shapes, and defines the ‘‘‘descendence
phase’’’ of the capital-relation-dominated epoch of human [pre-]history, the
phase which largely coincides with the ‘‘‘real subsumption of labor under
capital’’’ [Marx].”

The “organic composition of capital” [Marx], and the related
“technical composition of capital” [Marx] -- of the capital-value of, e.g., an
“individual capital” [single enterprise], of an industry capitals-aggregate, or
of the aggregate or total social capital of a nation-state, or of the world
market totality -- can serve as proxies/approximate metrics for the degree of
exposure of that capital or capitals-aggregate to
productive-force-increase-induced depreciation.”

“The ‘‘‘descendence phase’’’ of capitalist civilization, of
a civilization which is, at the very least, a ‘‘‘political-economy’’’, not just an
“economy”, is not a matter
of any merely mechanical
breakdown in any economic-only dynamics of the capitals-system.”

“That is a key reason why Marx’s critique of capitalist
civilization is a “critique of political-economy”,
not just a “critique of economy”, or of “economic mechanics”.”

“The cause of capitalist ‘‘‘descendence’’’ is a
pre-eminently psychohistorical cause.”

“This cause is rooted in the collective, ideological
reaction of the capitalist ruling class, as already constituting
a ‘‘‘class-for-itself’’’, when and after the leadership of that ruling class
comes to an -- ideologically warped -- awareness of the mortalthreat that later, high and growing
productive force capitalism poses to the continued rule of that ruling class.”

“Think of what fusion power would do to core ruling class petroleum capital.”

“The New/FinalDarkAge
tendency of late, ‘‘‘descendence phase’’’ capitalism is a psychohistorical
tendency, driven by late-capitalist, anti-productive-forces ideologies, and pursued by the ruling class by
means that majorly include politics.”

“The psychohistorical
reaction of the core capitalist ruling class to their alarmed
awareness of the social reproductive force increase causation of the economic
threat to their capital, and, thus, to their socio-political power, induces
that ruling class to create the horrific ideologies -- e.g., “eugenics”,
fascism, and ‘humanocidal’, “People Are Pollution” ‘‘‘exterminationism’’’ --
and creates the horrific societal consequences -- vicious Police States, World
Depressions, World Wars, mounting Genocides, both overt and ‘‘‘stealth’’’ -- that
constitute the ‘‘‘descendence phase’’’ of the capitalist epoch full-blown, as
we have already seen, and, with even greater horrors to come, UNLESS OR UNTIL A REVOLUTIONARY WORLD
WORKING CLASS REALIZES WHAT IS HAPPENING TO IT, AND INTERVENES IN ITS OWN DEFENSE.”

“The common objective of all of these ruling-class-engineered ideologies, created to delude and to disarm the working class, and of the strategies behind these ideologies, is to cripple and then to reverse the historic growth of the human-social forces of production, including, especially, to reverse the core reality of all of those forces of production: the growth of human population itself.”

Tuesday, October 11, 2016

This blog-entry is to share our solution to a long-unsolved
mystery of pre-WWII U. S. history -- that of the kidnapping and murder of the Lindbergh child.

It is a methodological principle of F.E.D.
‘psychohistorical materialism’, to probe those events which breach the ruling
class’s organization of appearances -- “anomalous” events, events which
break out of the usual control, by that ruling class, and, consequently, which
the ruling class mass media, their intellectual prostitutes, their hired liars,
cannot explain, without risking revelations that would, potentially, undermine their rule.

If, by extension of an existing psychohistorical theory --
one already arrived at, by other, independent lines of evidence; one that
potentially explains what is really going on in [recent] human history -- one
can discover a potential “solution” to such an unsolved [psycho]historical
mystery, then that result constitutes further potential corroboration of that
existing psychohistorical theory.Moreover, details of the potential solution of that [psycho]historical
mystery may lead to the discernment of possible improvements to that existing
psychohistorical theory -- in this case, a Marxian psychohistorical theory regarding a potentially embarassing and revealing incident within the
strategy and tactics of the ‘descendence phase’ capitalist ruling class.

GLOBAL STRATEGIC
HYPOTHESES --The 'Rockefeller Crime[s-Against-Humanity] Family', and the
Rockefeller Foundation, funded “eugenics”, including, especially, in America, and
in Germany, where it morphed into Hitler's “eugenics” concentration/extermination camps, etc. The Rockefellers, fearing a potential alliance between Germany and Russia that could overthrow the Rockefellers' 1930s-emerging world dictatorship, had assigned Hitler to attack Russia and Eastern Europe, and to
enslave and exterminate the Slavic peoples ["Generalplan Ost", and
"Operation Barbarossa"]. The Rockefellers intended this to lead to the mutual destruction, or, at least, to the profound weakening, of both Germany and Russia.The Rockefeller plutocracy no longer talks
openly about “eugenics”, ever since Hitler turned against them -- as signaled in Hitler’s
1939 “Peace Pact” with Stalin -- whereafter Hitler endeavored to wrest world domination away
from the Rockefellers, into his own hands, instead of continuing to be their ‘Servant-Dictator.
With Hitler thus become Rockefeller enemy number one, for the wrong reasons -- as well as enemy number one of all decent human beings, world wide, for the right reasons -- Hitler's defeat led to the post-WWII world wide public revelation of Hitler’s “eugenics”
camps [and other] horrors. The very word “eugenics” then became anathema, among all decent human beings world wide.After WWII, the Rockefellers had to switch to their "People Are Pollution" perversion of the grass roots anti-pollution movement as cover for their continued pursuit of “eugenics” global 'humanocide'.

The Rockefellers had set up other “eugenics” ‘servant-dictatorships’
all over the world, outside of both the U. S. and Germany, in the 1930s -- e.g., the Franco, Salazar, Mussolini, Horthy, Hirohito and Tojo 'servant-dictatorships'.

During the prelude to WWII, the Rockefellers had also been grooming “eugenicist”Charles
Lindbergh to become their U.S. ‘servant-dictator’,
after their planned overthrow of the Roosevelt presidency -- and had therefore also been
cultivating his vast U.S. [and world-wide] celebrity and popularity -- up until
he fathered a “genetically defective” son. The latter event disqualified the “eugenicist”, Lindbergh, in the eyes of the Rockefellers, from representing the Rockefellers’ “good genes” ideology
as to who should rule, and who should die. Lindbergh had his “genetically
defective” son kidnapped and murdered in March 1932, hoping, thereby, to suppress
press coverage of his son’s “genetic defect”, and to get back into the “good
graces” of the Rockefellers, so as to once again be their choice for their U.S.
‘servant-dictator’, after their overthrow of the Roosevelt regime.

But because of Lindbergh’s child’s “eugenics”-disqualifying “genetic defects”, the Rockefeller plutocracy turned away from Lindbergh as their candidate U.
S. ‘servant-dictator’, despite Lindbergh’s [criminal] efforts to the contrary.

Instead, the Rockefeller plutocracy eventually approached
Marine General Smedley Butler to lead their overthrow of the Roosevelt regime,
and to become their U. S. fascist military [servant-]dictator.

Unfortunately for the Rockefeller plutocracy, Butler went
public about their request to him, and forced that plutocracy to go into overdrive
in cover-up mode BIG TIME. [See Jules Archer, The Plot to Seize the White House: The Shocking TRUE Story of the Conspiracy to Overthrow FDR, New York: Sky Horse Publishing, Inc., 2007].

Soon -- because of Hitler’s ‘franken-dictator’ turn against
the Rockefeller plutocracy -- that plutocracy had to put up with the Roosevelt
regime anyway, needing that popular regime to mobilize the people of the U. S. to save the Rockefeller
plutocracy from their frankenstein-like monster, Hitler.

In Summary:Lindbergh
wanted his son eliminated before that child’s “genetic defect(s)” became too
well known publicly, in the hopes of retaining the Rockefeller mantle as their U. S. ‘servant-dictator-to-be’,
despite Lindbergh’s “eugenics” defects, as revealed by Lindbergh's son's disabilities.﻿

Evidence of Lindbergh's involvement in the
kidnapping of his own child is presented in the following PBS NOVA episode
[original air date 31 July 2013; from time-index ~37:35 to time-index ~44:17] -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOc_gztk2E8 -- and in a major book on the kidnapping by Rutgers historian Lloyd Gardner [Lloyd Gardner,The Case That Never Dies:The Lindbergh Kidnapping].

Monday, October 10, 2016

Below is an excerpt from my reply to a reader regarding the upcoming U. S. General Election.The views expressed are my own, and do not necessarily reflect those of the Equitist Advocacy group or of Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica.

The best case scenario that I believe to be possible would be that
Clinton is checked and balanced in her ability to carry out the
'Rocke-Nazi' plan for 'Global Warming Austerity' -- $2,000. per month
energy utility bills for most of America, resulting in bankruptcy of the
U.S. social safety net, and FEMA "protective custody" camps [Eugenics
Camps, i.e., concentration/extermination camps] for the resulting surge
of homeless Americans, etc, etc. -- by a
majority Republican House and/or Senate.

Clinton may try to rule by decree ["Executive Orders"], to de facto repeal
the Second Amendment of the U. S. Constitution/Bill Of Rights ["The Right To Bear Arms"], and to pack the Supreme Court with
Rockefeller-Whore "Eugenicists", like herself, but Republican majorities
in the House and/or Senate could block at least part of her
'Rocke-Nazi' pogrom/program.
However, the Republican party may be in disarray, and may even splinter, after a Trump defeat.

You can imagine the storm of "finger-pointing" that would break out within the Republican party after such a defeat!

That may be exactly what the Rockefellers want -- to now disable their
Republican party, so that the 'Rocke-Nazis' can go all out, via their Democrat party,
to implement 'Global Warming Austerity', and get the no longer so Rockefeller-useful Republican party out of the way.

[a service-provider actually recently suggested to me a theory that this is the
purpose of Trump's candidacy -- that Trump and the Clinton's are old
friends, and that their children are friends, and that Trump agreed to
run to make sure that Hillary will win, by constantly shooting himself
in the foot, jamming both of his feet into his mouth, and engaging in
other self-defeating behaviors, but that, to Trump's and the Clintons'
surprise, Trump's destructive actions -- that would have long since been
lethal to any other/previous candidate for the Presidency -- haven't
worked, until the latest one, the video-audio of his 2005 vicious
remarks about women and about his assaults upon them.

Such a theory, while hard to believe, would rationally explain a lot of the 'psychohistorical phenomena' of the Trump campaign].

In short, I believe that the best hope for humanity is that the Trump populist
movement -- and the Bernie Sanders populist movement -- will slow down
Hilary Clinton's implementation of the Rockefeller police-state
state-capitalist dictatorship/'humanocide' plan --

The ruling class is on notice that a growing percentage of the
population is in a populist rage against them -- that "the pitchforks
are coming". Our best hope for the present is that this induces
enough fear in the plutocracy to hold them back in their implementation
of their ultra-evil plans.

There
is always a danger, of course, that the 'Rocke-Nazis' will decide that
the
lavishly-provisioned, radiation-shielded, closed-ventillation
underground cities that they
are building for themselves -- using taxpayer dollars, of course, to
"accommodate" plutocrats who pay no taxes -- are
"comfy enough", and, in their frustration, opt for a quick way to
achieve their "People Are Pollution" goal of "95% population
reduction": e.g., to start a nuclear war, via escalation vis-a-vis North Korea, and/or vis-a-vis
China/South China Sea, and/or vis-a-vis Russia/Assad/Iran/Ukraine, etc., etc.
The 'Rocke-Nazis' know that their intensifying weakening of the U.S.
majority population --

via vast un- and under- employment, and via
wages/salaries underpayment, via autism/adulterated vaccines, via
Alzheimer's disease, via new 'designer diseases' like their GMO-AIDS and
GMO-Zika viruses, and via their Opioid prescriptions mass massacre of
Americans, via their
side-effects-cascades-engineered "[pseudo-]medicines"/pharmaceuticals, their food
pollution, their food adulteration, the summary murder of unarmed African
American citizens, and of other American Citizens, by
"Eugenics"-indoctrinated police,
and all of the after-effects of their engineered "Great Recession"
'designer depression' [e.g., the epidemic of psychological depression, pharmaceutical drugging, and the surge in suicides resulting from all of this], mutilation of U.S. soldiers [sent to
invade other countries], e.g., by IEDs, and via U.S. soldiers' forced
participation in 'Stealth Humanocide', "Eugenics" atrocities
["collateral damage", or, as Assange calls it, "collateral murder"],
resulting in a
PTSD epidemic, pharmaceutical drugging of ex-soldiers, and a surge in [ex-]soldier suicide rates as a consequence of all of this, etc., etc.

-- will eventually
weaken the military potential of the U.S.

The U.S ruling class plutocrats are not about to hand world domination
over to the state-capitalist police-state dictatorship
state-bureaucratic ruling class of China, so they have to have a plan in
place to remove China as a threat to them -- e.g., either by a
"designer disease" pandemic, focused in China [aerosol-vectored
GMO-Ebola?][remember the "SARS" dress rehearsal?], or by Chinese-currency-value-collapse
'bubble-engineering', or by nuclear war, etc., etc.

Saturday, October 01, 2016

This blog-entry is to share our solution to a long-unsolved
mystery of the World WarII Nazi regime.

It is a methodological principle of F.E.D.
‘psychohistorical materialism’, to probe those events which breach the ruling
class’s organization of appearances -- “anomalous” events, events which
break out of the usual control of that ruling class, and, consequently, which
the ruling class mass media, their intellectual prostitutes, their hired liars,
cannot explain, without risking revelations that would, potentially, undermine their rule.

If, by extension of an existing psychohistorical theory --
one already arrived at, by other, independent lines of evidence; one that
potentially explains what is really going on in [recent] human history -- one
can discover a potential “solution” to such an unsolved [psycho]historical
mystery, then that result constitutes further potential corroboration of that
existing psychohistorical theory.

Moreover, details of the potential solution of that [psycho]historical
mystery may lead to the discernment of possible improvements to that existing
psychohistorical theory -- in this case, a Marxian psychohistorical theory regarding the
strategy and tactics of the ‘descendence phase’ capitalist ruling class.

Part of the “existing psychohistorical theory” that is
extended, in this case, to potentially solve the mystery of Rudolf Hess, is
partially elaborated in the following earlier post to this blog --

. . . Besides Joe Kennedy, there
was another ultra-prominent pro-Fascist figure who, we conjecture, sought to “re-turn”
the Nazi regime in Germany, back to Rockefeller-servitude, restoring the deal
that had prevailed prior to Hitler’s ‘franken-dictator’ turn against
Rockefeller world rule, in pursuit of Hitler's ambition to replace the Rockefellers with himself as world ruler.

That “eugenicist” racist was none
other than Hitler’s “Deputy Führer”, Rudolf Hess.

In 1941, the year that Hitler was
secretly scheduled to invade the “Soviet” Union -- the invasion was initially planned for 15 May 1941, but actually
occurred on 22 June 1941 -- Hess flew solo, on 10 May 1941, five days before the planned invasion date, from Germany to Britain, in a flight unauthorized by the Hitler regime,
in an effort to negotiate peace with Britain, in return, we hold, for Germany’s invasion
of Russia.

This negotiating gambit presented,
to the Rockefellers, via their British followers and allies, the potential for
a return to Hitler’s ‘original assignment’, for the Rockefellers, and for the
Rockefellers’ British “elite”, “eugenicist” followers and allies.

We hypothesize that Hess knew well
of Hitler’s planned “Operation Barbarossa”
invasion of Stalinist Russia, and that he timed his defection based upon the
imminence of that potential return to ‘the original deal’, as a bargaining chip
offered by him to the Rockefellers, via their British followers and allies.

We think that Hess foresaw
Germany’s defeat in a two-front war, warring concurrently with both Russia and
the combined U.S/British forces, and
saw a “re-turn” to ‘the original, Rockefeller-serving deal’ as a way out of
that otherwise total defeat, for himself, and for his country.

Hess’s plan, we think, would have
involved the overthrow of Hitler by the original, anti-‘franken-dictatorship’,
anti-“turn” faction within the Nazi Party, and the
replacement of Hitler by Hess, as the new -- restored -- Rockefeller ‘servant-dictator’.We know that the British cabinet met at least
once to consider the Hess situation.

Unfortunately for Hess, the
Rockefellers, having experienced one German, Nazi ‘franken-dictator’ turn,
chose not, we conjecture, to risk another.

The threat of a German-Russian
alliance, combining unsurpassed science and engineering with unsurpassed labor,
land, petroleum, and other natural resources, was a threat to the otherwise
unchallenged global imperium of the U.S./U.K. -- Rockefeller dominated --
capitalist ruling class.

A key strategic
goal of their funding of the rise of the Nazi ‘servant-dictatorship’ in Germany
had been to destroy that threat via a mutual destruction, in all out war, of
Germany versus Russia.

If the Rockefellers sponsored yet a
new, Nazi ‘servant-dictatorship’, this time under Hess, and if they supported his conquest of
Stalinist Russia, what was to prevent a renewed ‘franken-dictator’ turn by Hess
himself, once he had acquired the resources of Russia, and “added” them to those
of Germany?

We conjecture that the
Rockefellers, already knowing well that, after World War II, they would soon have to fight a new
contender to take over their throne of world domination, in the form of
Stalinist Russia -- by means of the already-emerging “Cold War” -- if they
supported Stalinist Russia against Nazi Germany, preferred to face that
challenge, with a Germany broken, defeated, and occupied by troops ultimately
controlled by the Rockefellers, than to risk having to fight a combined Germany-Russia,
under the control of a new Nazi ‘franken-dictatorship’.

Hence, they locked up Rudolf Hess,
for the rest of his life.

Hess was not allowed to meet with
or speak with his family, including his wife, for the next 28 years after his flight.

Perhaps the
ruling, Rockefeller faction feared that news of Hess’s real mission, and its context, might reach
the parts of the press that the Rockefellers did not yet own or control.

Hess was alone in Spandau
prison from 1966, after Albert Speer, and Baldur von Schirach -- the former
head of the Hitler Youth -- were released, up until Hess’s death, “by suicide”, on
17 August 1987, at age 93.

Perhaps public pressure was
building, over time, to release Hess too?

Perhaps the Rockefellers feared that, e.g., on his death bed, if no
longer under the strict control of prison confinement, Hess might reveal the
true story of his 22 June 1941 flight, and its context?

Perhaps his death in 1987, was made to
look like a suicide, but was -- as many have speculated* -- really yet another assassination, ordered by the
Rockefeller ruling faction, to, once again, cover up their unequaled “eugenics”crimes
against humanity?

*The Wikipedia entry on Rudolf Hess, as of today’s
date, notes the following:Hess’s
“lawyer, Dr Seidl, felt Hess was too old and frail to have managed to kill
himself. Wolf Rüdiger Hess repeatedly claimed that his father had been murdered
by the British Secret Intelligence Service to prevent
him from revealing information about British misconduct during the war.
Abdallah Melaouhi, who served as Hess's medical orderly from 1982 to 1987, was
dismissed from his position at his local district parliament's Immigration and
Integration Advisory Council after he wrote a self-published book on a similar
theme. According to an investigation by the British government in 1989, the
available evidence did not back up the claim that Hess was murdered, and
Solicitor General Sir Nicholas Lyell saw no
grounds for further investigation...”.