michael rice wrote:
> You're getting ahead of me again.
I'm sorry. I didn't expect you to understand the whole thing. Rather,
I'm just showing what is possible. Notice that there is no lambda
abstraction in the function implementation. The entire thing is
constructed with combinators, functions that take other functions as
arguments. I was trying to emphasize that it is very Haskelly to accept
and return functions as happily as normal values.
- Jake