Thanks Sky, you just planned my night. Now I have to pour another Capt. & Coke and read the link you provided.

Here's 1 qoute from it:

WE ACCUSE PEON PANETTA OF STEALING $1.3++ TRILLION
We therefore accuse Leon Panetta POINT BLANK of stealing $1.3++ trillion on the instructions of George Bush Sr. and Barbara Bush and of making
arrangements to pay off all who are supposed to know better, and who purport to have been manoeuvring to clear up this mess – including Gold Badges
and others who will be named, if this matter deteriorates any further.

WHY HAVENT ANY OF THE TOP LEVEL CRIMINALS BEEN REMOVED?
And WHO is Leon Panetta’s boss? Stand up, Barack Hussein Obama, the elected official who is responsible for getting this done. Mr Obama, here are
our questions to you, Sir:

(1): Why have you not fired Leon Panetta?

(2): Why have you not fired Mrs Hillary Clinton?

(3): Why have you not fired that liar, Timothy Geithner?

(4): What double game are you playing, and why do you imagine for one moment that you are going to get away with further duplicity with impunity?

On the INTERPOL site, there is a new's section. In that section, there is no reference to operation stillpoint, or destruction of America. I asked,
why a story this big wouldn't be in INTERPOL's NEWS section, never mind their front page... 'INTERPOL unravels NWO plot to destroy
America', 'INTERPOL have liberated the American people from the grasp of the NWO'.

You provided me with a very cute executive order. But still, doesn't prove, nor explain anything about 'Operation Stillpoint'.

*TO adamc3

Alot of the articles ATS members submit as evidence, are European Newspapers (don't think for a second I doubt the credibility of a EU newspaper). I
do however doubt the Bush syndicate you speak of has censorship over the EU newspapers as well....Surely a story of this magnitude would be printed in
one of their newspapers....

Please stop the left/right B.S. when will we learn. Even the origanal site for this says it:

In this connection, we would like to point out that knee-jerk responses on certain websites to our reference in the report dated 7th January to Mr
Obama, and the rôle of Republicans, were ignorant fantasies. Mr Obama is, whether you or anyone else likes it or not, a central figure in this
crisis. We don’t care whether he’s Father Christmas, Brigitte Bardot or Frankenstein. It doesn’t matter what his politics are for THIS PURPOSE,
either; and neither are sterile partisan politics RELEVANT IN THE FOCUSED CONTEXT that we are addressing.

BH, the reason and the ONLY reason I joined here is that since the Reagan Era the government has proposed the same scenario.

The rest of this is supposition on my part!

Look at it this way, neither party (be it dem or repub) has been any different than the other.

We as a nation have both lost liberties and freedoms. Be it from dem or repub control. Has this loss helped us in the control or security we have
wanted to secure? That is an interpretation I leave to you.

Anyone that has been listening or has been alive for the past 50 years ask themselves what are we trying to prevent?

Control is a major factor in anything we decide to extrapolate. Do we assume that all terrorist activity is fundemental or do we assume it is
reactionary?

Here is my question, do we allow our government to become reactionary to perceived intrusions to our civil liberties? Or do we tell them that THEY are
the problem not the solution?

Please stop the left/right B.S. when will we learn. Even the origanal site for this says it:

In this connection, we would like to point out that knee-jerk responses on certain websites to our reference in the report dated 7th January to Mr
Obama, and the rôle of Republicans, were ignorant fantasies. Mr Obama is, whether you or anyone else likes it or not, a central figure in this
crisis. We don’t care whether he’s Father Christmas, Brigitte Bardot or Frankenstein. It doesn’t matter what his politics are for THIS PURPOSE,
either; and neither are sterile partisan politics RELEVANT IN THE FOCUSED CONTEXT that we are addressing.

I've read that site, and about 5 other sites that look exactly the same. I couldn't help but get a feel that a lone spammer was behind all this and
decided to spread some bs rumor about INTERPOL busting perhaps the biggest conspiracy known to man...

GOOGLE site #1www.freerepublic.com...
Read the comments: (My comments were about the same as theirs when I first read this article)

To: flash2368

Author drunk?

2 posted on Friday, January 08, 2010 5:49:24 PM by ataDude

To: flash2368

One of the ways I judge the legitimacy of a source is their ability to comprehend the simplest function of the Caps Lock button. If they can’t
properly use that, what’s the point of trusting anything else they say?

3 posted on Friday, January 08, 2010 5:50:39 PM by mnehring

To: flash2368

My initial analysis: Not enough ALL CAPS to be trusted.

Basically, what I do is go to these sites and hold down my spacebar to scroll through the page.

If I can rip an entire fart before I hit the bottom of the page, then I mark the article as superfluous.

GOOGLE site #3www.resistnet.com...
This guys speaking my language :]
[quote=AZ Debi]I have no way of knowing how valid this info is...but I'm sharing it because it does seem to give some kind of answer to the Interpol
situation...it is an enormous read

Originally posted by JayinAR
I can't believe so many here are having trouble with what was posted.

I haven't even read the article yet, yet I believe I can tell you all what is being said.
Obama allowed INTERPOL jurisdiction inside Washington D.C. to protect *him* as he ramps up his efforts to route out CIA, amongst others, involvement
in the current state of affairs here in America.

They are saying, openly, that the attack on that plane from the "Nigerian" has the toolmarks of the CIA on it and they are calling them out.
Probably using INTERPOL to investigate.

This is very good news.
However, it strikes me odd that such a move comes just before the deathblow to the US is dealt through economic means (Russia completes pipeline and
now becomes world's leading oil exporter). Time to flush the rats, perhaps?

I don't know... But what this is saying is that Obama is taking a proactive stance in cleaning up the intelligence agencies and forcing them to
behave honorably, lest they go to prison.

Now I'm off to read the article.

But Obama has no choice, since a huge financial lien has now been levied against the United States by China and Britain. We have effectively lost our
sovereignty until our debt is paid off. As always the Bush family shows itself to be a cadre of complete f**kups. The arrogant SOB's thought that
they could pull off this heist, and let's not doubt for a minute that the bogus mortgage business that shook the world economy wasn't part of the
plan, completely ignoring the possibilty that the rest of the world might not look upon their criminality too kindly. No doubt much of this info will
never see the light of day on the MSM, but here's hoping that a few non-USA Black Op corps eliminate the problem children once and for all.

..if even a 1/3 of that is true..wow. Well, it looks like the civil war has started. Who knew it would be the US Govt. vs. itself? not buying
it completely, but, I have to say I've never seen a story anywhere tie the pieces together like this. Need to read again..

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.