Post navigation

Testing Evolutionism (the alleged theory of evolution)

Testability is the main thing a concept needs in order to be considered science. If your claims cannot be tested then science doesn’t care about them. Enter evolutionism, also mistakenly called the theory of evolution, ie the concept that all biological diversity evolved via natural selection, drift and neutral construction starting from some much simpler biological replicator, which in turn evolved from much simpler molecular replicators.

None of that can be tested. Not only that the sub-claims are also untestable. Biology is full of biological systems, subsystems and structures. These too need to have testability, yet they do not. Evolutionists hide behind father time and think that excuses them from the testability criteria science requires. All that does is prove theirs is not a scientific position.

No one knows how ATP synthase arose and no one knows how to test the claim that natural selection, drift and neutral construction did it. Dembski tried to help by formulating a conditional probability but he was shrugged off. Evolutionists are fine failing on their own and don’t need no steenking help from Dembski!

So how can we test your claims, evolutionists? And why, in the absence of testability, do you think your position qualifies as science?

431 Replies to “Testing Evolutionism (the alleged theory of evolution)”

Compared to adapa, acartia, ahmed, Alan Fox, keiths, Patrick, dazz, OMagain, Robin, Rumrat and Allan Miller my posts actually address the debate. You guys are just upset because I have exposed you as a bunch of scientifically illiterate poseurs who couldn’t support your position if your life depended on it.

Can’t beat ’em might as well ban ’em. Strange that you don’t see that as being cowardly

I think we have a particular problem with a particular commenter who is not interested in dialogue. I think that commenter has had ample opportunity to demonstrate it and I think we should call a halt, at least temporarily. I suggest a suspension of posting privileges for, say 30 days.

Well folks, not sure what happened there. Frankie’s account is now suspended and disabled so that no further comment should appear. In fairness to JoeG/Frankie I should point out that he can be reached at his own blog – Intelligent Reasoning