The most powerful TV ad that Barack Obama's campaign is using to
attack his Republican rival has a punchline delivered by John
McCain himself in an old clip: "I voted with the President over 90
per cent of the time, higher than a lot of my Republican
colleagues."

It is a simple fact that McCain used his vote in the Senate to
support George W. Bush's legislative program nine times out of 10
in recent years. They are both Republican, so why wouldn't he?

Yet in today's America it is also the most damaging confession
he could possibly make. Bush is pure poison, the most unpopular
president in the history of opinion polling.

He will leave office on January 20 with a record of presiding
over two recessions, and starting two wars that he could not
finish. This amounts to a record of failure unmatched by any
president.

"You know, do you think President Bush really understands any of
this stuff?" poses the late-night TV comedian Jay Leno. "Like
today, he was asked about General Motors. And he said, 'I think
he's doing a fine job in Iraq'."

General Motors, once the proud symbol of America's industrial
might, is under threat of bankruptcy. It's holding urgent merger
talks with Chrysler and seeking Federal handouts. Detroit was
always shorthand for the US car industry; now it is shorthand for
industrial rot and urban decay.

One national institution after another is in crisis in George
Bush's America. Wall Street, as we knew it, no longer exists.

All five of the marquee Wall Street investment banks have been
either wiped out or taken shelter under government guarantee in the
form of a banking licence. Much of the banking system and the
insurance sector has been nationalised.

The great institution of the American middle class, mainstay of
the US economy and society, has suffered stagnant incomes in recent
years and now has reached the point of exhaustion.

In the first six years of the Bush Administration, 2000 to 2006,
the US economy grew in real terms by 18 per cent. And middle class
wages? The real income for the median household fell 1.1 per cent.
But for the richest 1 per cent of households, incomes trebled.

The middle class kept shopping nonetheless. How? Credit. But
consumer credit has reached its limit. House prices have fallen an
average 20 per cent, destroying $US3 trillion ($4.5 trillion) in
homeowner wealth, and the crash in share prices has destroyed
another $US8 trillion. All up, that is about one fifth of the
cumulative stock of household wealth that has been wiped out.
Families are poorer and banks are retracting credit lines.

The headline from this week's GDP numbers was that the economy
had shrunk in the three months to September 30, marking the onset
of recession.

But the numbers disclosed the first quarterly fall in consumer
spending since 1991, and the biggest fall since 1980.

As the economy has fallen into a slump, the US consumer can no
longer perform her customary task as spender of last resort, "like
Atlas, bearing the economy on their backs" in the words of Josh
Bivens of the Economic Policy Institute in Washington. "The
American consumer shopped but has now dropped."

Yet another key institution, the military, has also come under
tremendous stress in meeting the Bush Administration's decision to
wage simultaneous wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The US under Bush has been at war longer than it spent fighting
in World War II. More than 4100 US soldiers have been killed in
Iraq and another 600-plus in Afghanistan.

And there is a heavy burden on the living. For US reservists on
duty in Iraq, between 8000 and 12,000 every month are ordered to
extend their tours beyond their standard 12-month deployment. This
is a de facto conscription.

US commanders are concerned that their resources are perpetually
overstretched. Dr Ira Katz, the head of mental health services for
Veterans Affairs, estimated about 1000 veterans a month were
attempting suicide, the highest number since records have been
kept.

Because the military cannot afford to allow troops any more
leave, about one in six US soldiers in the field is prescribed
antidepressants.

The cumulative effect of all this loss, failure and exhaustion?
The pollster Carroll Doherty of the non-partisan Pew Research
Centre in Washington says: "The national mood is as bad as it's
been in 30 years. Even before the financial crisis intensified in
recent months, there's been an overwhelming sense of
frustration.

"Bush has the lowest ever approval rating of 22 per cent, worse
than Nixon's worst of 23. Bush has also had this very low
popularity for an extended period. Nixon polled at that sort of
level for a few months and then resigned" over the Watergate
scandal. "Bush hasn't been above 30 per cent all year. There is
just this enormous desire for change."

So another of the damaged institutions is the presidency itself.
Bush phoned the triumphant baseball team, the Phillies, this week
to congratulate them on winning the World Series, but, according to
David Letterman, "the Phillies have caller ID, so it was OK."

No one wants to talk to the President. Instead of campaigning
for the Republican candidate, Bush has been kept under wraps. This
week he was allowed to visit Republican campaign workers, but he
was not allowed contact with voters.

Both presidential candidates are campaigning on a platform of
change, both campaigning as the anti-Bush. But this is much harder
for McCain than for Obama.

"People are tired," summarises a professor of political science
at Stanford University, Morris Fiorina. "Clearly we have major
failure here, so there's a sense we need to try something new."

McCain, 72 years old, a senator for 22 years and on his second
try for the presidency, is having trouble making the case that he
is the "something new" that Americans crave.

Bush has unified Americans, but not in any positive sense. "When
we ask people if they think the country's heading in the right
direction, nine out of 10 say no," Doherty reports. "It's never
been so high."

The closest it's ever come to this was just after the Clinton
recession when, in 1993, about eight in 10 said they thought the
country was off track.

And the non-partisan political analyst Charlie Cook says that
"it doesn't matter how voters feel about the Democrats - they care
more about voting against Bush".

"Obama," says a prominent Democratic lobbyist, Tony Podesta of
the Podesta Group, who has worked with the Democrat candidate, "is
so dramatically different from Bush that he's the antithesis of
Bush".

The main Republican criticism of Obama is that he is
inexperienced, and he certainly lacks any experience of executive
office. But Robert Louis Stevenson wrote that "politics is perhaps
the only profession for which no preparation is thought necessary".
And in this case, in a country seeking something entirely fresh, it
may be an advantage for Obama that he is unknown and lacks a track
record.

Bush has been so bitter an experience for Americans that he has
discredited not only himself, but his party, and his party's
ideology. He has primed America not only for a change of president,
but for something bigger.

Obama said yesterday: "We need a new direction, we need a new
politics, we need a new president."

The last of these - a new president - is actually the smallest
element in this three-part formula for change. The biggest is the
new direction, the sort of sea change that arrives in the US about
once in a generation, the sort of change that carries with it a
whole new ideology and conceptualisation of the world.

"Socially and politically, America is ripe for a broad historic
shift to the left," one of America's foremost conservative
philosophers, Francis Fukuyama, best known for his work The End
Of History, told the Herald some months ago.

The last big shift in America was a rightward movement, the
Reagan Revolution, which found its British tandem in the Thatcher
Revolution. The Thatcher-Reagan revolutions put the market at the
centre of public policy in a direct challenge to the statism of
communism and socialism.

Even before the spectacular collapse of Wall Street this year,
Fukuyama's diagnosis was that the conservative movement in the US
had reached a kind of exhaustion: "All the gains from that agenda
have been realised. And probably it's gone too far, gone over the
line, in terms of tax cuts. You end up with a pretty explosive
social situation and the time is now ripe for a swing back. The
right is in a lot of trouble. We have rising inequality, bad health
care and a failed foreign policy."

And since Fukuyama delivered that analysis, Wall Street has
suffered its biggest and most devastating crunch since the Great
Crash of 1929. The debacle in the banking system has discredited
deregulation and laissez faire.

The regulator responsible, the former Federal Reserve chairman
Alan Greenspan, was called to account by a congressional committee
last week. Greenspan is the high priest of the free market, the
dominant figure in world finance for his 18 years at the top of the
Fed, so it was a turning point when he recanted.

His accuser, the Democratic congressman Henry Waxman, charged:
"You had the authority to prevent irresponsible lending practices
that led to the subprime mortgage crisis. You were advised to do so
by many others. Do you feel that your ideology pushed you to make
decisions that you wish you had not made?"

The once great man conceded: "Yes, I've found a flaw. I don't
know how significant or permanent it is. But I've been very
distressed by that fact." He claimed to be in a state of "shocked
disbelief" that the banking system and the credit markets had been
unable to self-regulate.

The average American's personal investment account, known as a
401K account, has lost half its value of a year ago.

A cartoon in the magazine The New Yorker depicts a
crestfallen man walking through a barren countryside clutching a
toaster. The caption: "What I got to keep from my life's
savings."

Fukuyama updated his observation in an article in
Newsweek: "It took an economic crisis of massive proportions
from 1929 to 1931 to bring a Democratic administration to power.
Polls indicate we may have arrived again at that point in October
2008."

Fukuyama argues that the Reagan era will end next week. He is in
a fast-growing club.

Many other commentators have chimed in with him in recent weeks
as the market has collapsed and the Democrats have pulled ahead in
the polling. Pew's Doherty again: "People are talking about this
election as not just a change election but a realignment, a big
sweep like Reagan had, and looking at the polling it's certainly a
possibility."

One of the Republican lines of attack on Obama in recent days is
that he is a socialist, or, as McCain called him, the
"redistributor in chief". This is based on his policy to cut taxes
for those earning under $US250,000 a year, but to increase taxes on
those earning more.

And Obama proposes public spending increases that are certain to
increase the share of government outlays as a proportion of the
economy. But don't be misled by the "socialist" tag - it's still
America. As Obama told a crowd yesterday: "I love rich people. I
want you all to get rich. That's the American dream, that's the
American way."

Elsewhere, Obama has cited Ted Turner: "In America, money is how
we keep score." Besides, it's difficult to imagine any greater
intrusion by the state than the nationalisation of much of the US
banking system, as enacted by Bush.

If an ideological shift away from Reaganism is the change in
direction, what is the change in the politics? Stanford's Fiorina
reports the findings of a static sample of 5000 voters: "Since
2005, the percentage of voters who identify themselves as
Republicans has fallen by 8 to 10 percentage points, and it's down
across every demographic, young, old, male, female," while the
percentage identifying as Democrats has risen by several
points.

"It's across the board, and it suggests to me a disapproval of
Bush, it's a revulsion towards Bush."

So if there has been an ideological shift and a voter
realignment, the third and final part of the three-part formula for
change is a new president. Bush has primed the country for change.
All Obama has to do is seize the opportunity.

In sum, if Obama wins the election next Tuesday (Wednesday,
Sydney time) - and every indication is that he will - the first
person he should thank in his acceptance speech is George Bush.

1224956332749-smh.com.auhttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/nation-exhausted-how-us-consumers-shopped-until-they-dropped/2008/10/31/1224956332749.htmlsmh.com.auSydney Morning Herald2008-11-01Nation exhausted: how US consumers shopped until they droppedPeter HartcherAmericans are simply exhausted by the failures of politics
initiated by Reagan and trashed by George W. Bush, writes Peter
Hartcher.USFederalElection2008http://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/obama-born-to-run-says-the-boss/2008/11/03/1225560735897.htmlObama born to run, says the Bosstext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/big-load-shame-about-the-legs/2008/11/03/1225560735903.htmlBig load, shame about the legstext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/bush-did-not-reveal-ignorance-says-rudd/2008/11/03/1225560735882.htmlBush did not reveal ignorance, says Ruddtext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/australia-all-the-way-with-the-senator-from-illinois/2008/11/03/1225560735888.htmlAustralia all the way with the senator from Illinoistext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/wilting-bush-absentee-vote-for-president/2008/11/03/1225560735906.htmlWilting Bush: absentee vote for Presidenttext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/back-to-the-beginning-for-mccain/2008/11/03/1225560735900.htmlBack to the beginning for McCaintext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/agonising-over-his-aunt/2008/11/03/1225560733327.htmlAgonising over his aunttext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/hanging-chads-give-way-to-vote-flipping/2008/11/03/1225560735885.htmlHanging chads give way to vote flippingtext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/queues-may-do-more-damage/2008/11/03/1225560735894.htmlQueues may do more damagetext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/networks-go-headtohead-in-the-other-big-contest/2008/11/03/1225560735891.htmlNetworks go head-to-head in the other big contesttext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/razing-arizona-mccain-faces-home-invasion/2008/11/02/1225560645074.htmlRazing Arizona: McCain faces home invasiontext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/question-mark-on-youth-surge-for-obama/2008/11/02/1225560645089.htmlQuestion mark on youth surge for Obamatext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/defeat-fears-put-hollywood-on-edge/2008/11/02/1225560645086.htmlDefeat fears put Hollywood on edgetext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/even-a-homeless-mickey-mouse-can-vote-in-ohio/2008/11/02/1225560645092.htmlEven a homeless Mickey Mouse can vote in Ohiotext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/camps-trade-barbs-in-last-days/2008/11/02/1225560645080.htmlCamps trade barbs in last daystext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/palin-blames-democrats-for-scaring-the-elderly/2008/11/02/1225560645083.htmlPalin blames Democrats for scaring the elderlytext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/going-for-laughs-on-eve-of-election/2008/11/02/1225560645095.htmlGoing for laughs on eve of electiontext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/call-to-boost-british-troops/2008/11/02/1225560645098.htmlCall to boost British troopstext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/palin-takes-prank-call-from-fake-sarkozy/2008/11/03/1225560630221.htmlPalin takes prank call from fake Sarkozytext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/obama-didnt-know-aunts-illegal-status/2008/11/02/1225560630236.htmlObama 'didn't know aunt's illegal status'text/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/democrats-take-lead-in-battleground-states/2008/11/01/1224956401512.htmlDemocrats take lead in battleground statestext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/terminator-pumps-up-ohio-vote/2008/11/01/1224956395994.htmlTerminator pumps up Ohio votetext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/uss-deputy-no-more/2008/11/01/1224956396819.htmlUS's deputy no moretext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/aussies-barracking-for-obama/2008/11/01/1224956396755.htmlAussies barracking for Obamatext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/more-tricks-than-treats-in-final-days/2008/10/31/1224956332709.htmlMore tricks than treats in final daystext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/america-at-a-fork-in-the-road/2008/10/31/1224956332757.htmlAmerica at a fork in the roadtext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/victorious-candidate-needs-expert-team-behind-him/2008/10/31/1224956332793.htmlVictorious candidate needs expert team behind himtext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/a-world-of-policy-differences/2008/10/31/1224956332799.htmlA world of policy differencestext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/program-brought-to-you-by-obama/2008/10/31/1224956327835.htmlProgram brought to you by Obamatext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/past-and-possible-future-united/2008/10/30/1224956238507.htmlPast and possible future unitedtext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/mccain-accuses-obama-of-plo-link/2008/10/30/1224956238519.htmlMcCain accuses Obama of PLO linktext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/obama-cabinet-would-have-republicans/2008/10/30/1224956238510.htmlObama cabinet would have Republicanstext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/offtheleash-palin-keen-to-win--now-or-in-2012/2008/10/30/1224956238528.htmlOff-the-leash Palin keen to win - now, or in 2012text/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/rain-drives-on-obama-campaign/2008/10/29/1224956137076.htmlRain drives on Obama campaigntext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/economic-crisis-fears-of-gun-control-push-up-sales/2008/10/28/1224956039041.htmlEconomic crisis, fears of gun control push up salestext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/palin-not-failing-with-these-crowds/2008/10/28/1224956039049.htmlPalin not failing with these crowdstext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/palin-not-failing-with-these-crowds/2008/10/28/1224956039049.htmlPalin not failing with these crowdstext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/palin-not-failing-with-these-crowds/2008/10/28/1224956039049.htmlPalin not failing with these crowdstext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/palin-not-failing-with-these-crowds/2008/10/28/1224956039049.htmlPalin not failing with these crowdstext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/palin-not-failing-with-these-crowds/2008/10/28/1224956039049.htmlPalin not failing with these crowdstext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/palin-not-failing-with-these-crowds/2008/10/28/1224956039049.htmlPalin not failing with these crowdstext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/palin-not-failing-with-these-crowds/2008/10/28/1224956039049.htmlPalin not failing with these crowdstext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/palin-not-failing-with-these-crowds/2008/10/28/1224956039049.htmlPalin not failing with these crowdstext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/palin-not-failing-with-these-crowds/2008/10/28/1224956039049.htmlPalin not failing with these crowdstext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/palin-not-failing-with-these-crowds/2008/10/28/1224956039049.htmlPalin not failing with these crowdstext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/palin-not-failing-with-these-crowds/2008/10/28/1224956039049.htmlPalin not failing with these crowdstext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/palin-not-failing-with-these-crowds/2008/10/28/1224956039049.htmlPalin not failing with these crowdstext/html-documenthttp://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/palin-not-failing-with-these-crowds/2008/10/28/1224956039049.htmlPalin not failing with these crowdstext/html-documenthttp://blogs.smh.com.au/whitehouse08/archives/2008/10/why_obama_will_win.htmlWhy Obama will wintext/html-document