Siamo proprio sicuri che siano Rom e immigrati il principale problema di questo ipocrita Titanic?In Italy we are crossing a strange period where a consistent part of the population seems being perfectly able to identify the actual root of all the Italic problems. For (too) many people: Low growth, stuck economy, increasing unemplyment, low quality of life can be attribute to the people we are “hosting”, immigrants, not EU citizen and other minority and uncomfortable groups.

L’Italiano Medio (terms which refer to the middle class man but with a slight negative meaning because of his/her narrow point of view) has finally identified the causes of his evils and some questionable political celebs like Matteo Salvini become the cure. I wrote a post few days ago with some thoughts about “the Gypsy problem” (current Italian mainstream public debate) but from the comments I received sound like I made a mistake. Somebody said Gypsies are really a big issue and after my comment “They are not THE problem but just one of the many” the average answer was: “We need to clean our streets first” and after we can focus on the other problems. Which other secondary problems? Maybe a spoiled Public system (a small detail) that seems not to be perceived like a major issue?

Everybody complains about High taxation, corruption and high public money wasting but when it’s time to take a choice they prefer to deal with small communities of few thousands people.

Everybody is of course free to choose priorities but I would like to show below a small example and sign of which is the real Italian problem, first and unique legalized thief.

I pick up the brilliant and smart comments from the always excellent Oscar Giannino during his radio broadcasting “La versione di Oscar” del 21 Aprile 2015 (from 24:20 minute) who reveals how the Italian State can freely decide to have different duties compare to what it asks to its own citizens.

Giannino refers to the February 24th 2015 sentence of 3rd section of Lazio’s TAR (Regional Administrative Court dealing with private people complains against the Public Administration). The TAR replied to a reimbursement request from a citizen raising a claim against the National Health Administration. The court sentenced that the reimbursement is in line with law and payable but not the interests due to Health Administration payment delays.

The motivation was:”because of the objective Public administration economical condition and the circumstances which forced severe cuts to the public expensive”

Summary:

TAR court has been built to protect citizen rights in front of the Pubblic Administration.

In this case TAR (the State itself) decides for economical reasons which is allowed NOT to pay the interests to a citizen

It does not pay because declare to not have enough money

But whom State’s money comes from if not from the citizens? and why they’ve run out? Too many services or too many wastes?

When a citizen does not have economical resources to pay his own interests to the Public system, has he got any way to skip this payment?

It is not a shameful behavior of a country, isn’t it? A State which does not provide any rebate to his citizens but allows itself to delete his borrower duties?

To all of You..

..who see robbers every corners looking like foreigners, how would you define this Public Administration behavior?