What can I say? First, kudos to everyone for working on behalf of "the Hokkien language". There is good, free information on Tye's website, just unfortunately filtered through an irregular and unreliable "system" of spellings, if it can be called that. Nothing personal, just that irregular "systems"...

although figuring out how to type either using a computer is a different matter.... (as of now doing copy/paste) There are at least two well-tested IME add-ons out there for typing in POJ on any kind of computer. One is made available by 信望愛, the other by the "Chinese Taipei" 教育部. Let me know if U ...

Yeah, overall "quality of scholarship" is kind of disappointing for a modern paper. I kind of take exception to the authors treating Kedah Malay as if it was "not really Malay". But yeah, still useful for some things.

I think there should be two systems, Hanji and romanisation. Each should be capable of being written independently, but of course people can mix and interchange the two where necessary. 我是加減同意ら、不こ目前㑑純唐人字兮系統益干な卡適合純技術性兮寫作にあ。汝咁八㪯純唐人字兮福建文來寫不但技術性兮物仔、比論一篇三千字兮「檳榔嶼歷史介紹」。 Góa sī kekiám tông'ì--la, m̄ koh bo...

I have been leaving them as squares for the time being rather than using the Mandarin ones like 揣 for chhōe get on my nerves. Cán, cán. I've been using "尋" for chōe. This usage was apparently somewhat popular in the 20th century. I like the visual aspect of the kanji too, shading one's eyes with on...

While I also observe a trend that things above all are supposed to look pompous and not necessarily beautiful, I’m not quite sure how that relates to the topic of script-unification. U would have to first agree -- only of your own free will -- that the "MOE Hokkien aesthetic" is based on "Modern St...