“The big news is the cost cuts over the next two years. They’re finally biting the bullet and adjusting to the reality of an accelerating, secular decline in print.”

No, the big news is that online earnings are starting to make a difference. The About.com group’s earnings rose 16% from a year ago and made up 18% of operating profits.

Searby et al., if they care about anything, care about profit in the near and intermediate term. My sense, though, is that most media analysts believe that the Times and other media companies can do very well in the digital future as long as they don’t gut the product during the transition. I have no special insight, but do we really think Wall Street’s threadbare prescription makes sense?

P.S. I own 100 Times shares at $35, which shows you what I know.

Has America ever needed a media watchdog more than now? Help us by joining CJR today.

Don't Miss

The Washington Post’s November 24 report checked all the boxes: “The flood of ‘fake news’ this election season got support from a sophisticated Russian propaganda campaign,” it began. Not only had American voters been influenced by a deliberate...