Review My PDF

Generate My PDF

If you are generating a PDF of a journal article or book chapter, please provide title and author information.

BHL stores this information to allow these articles to be indexed, searched and retrieved by other users. If you download an article but do not provide title or author information, these articles will be lost.

Thank you for your request. Please wait for an email containing a link to download the PDF.

For your reference, the confirmation number for this request is .

There was an issue with the request. Please try again and if the problem persists, please send us feedback.

⇑line 7—bottom-marginannotationMight it not be «No» that temperate plants of S. shores of Australia wished to get still further south & far from wishing to get north. Yes. The tropical plants wd. crowd the equator & some few might cross. Hence Borneo plants wd. have come frm equatorial regions. (No: it wd be that the southern plants wd be not driven out by by fresh arrivals from further south, or only feebly so.) ‹(Yes)› (But being driven out wd not make any difference in spreading.) (If cold first came on on N. side ⸮I thinkit wd explain.) (If it requires time for some degree of acclimatisation then I think it wd certainy make differnce) (It wd. makegreator some difference whether northern or southern formsfirstoccupied th gaps in th Tropics; when once occupied, S. forms wd. have little chance of holding their own there .) (The mere numerical preponderance of N. forms, frm form of land wd. account perhps for it)

⇑lines 12—10score⇑line 10underline "Myrtaceae"⇑line 10annotationany species in common p. xxx. 1 in common ⇑line 10at "Epacrideae" annotationp. xxx some in common ⇑line 10underline "Protaceae"⇑line 10annotationXt01 ← do — not one only 2 altogether ? bottom-marginannotation‹⧟› This is all «fully» answered at p. xxx p xxx. Compositae & Orchideae Australian genera. Surely there is considerably more affinity to Australia «with Tasmania» than to any other quarter of World, both in same species & genera «Yes p. xxx»t02 : this was vy impressive in looking over th Flora. vide Strezlecki whether Eucalypts formerly in Tasmania NO

⇑line 11 {⇑line 11annotation horizontally crossed 76 genera .......... are S. American — of which 17 not in Australia (p xxxii) or in Old World. line 11at "American" annotationof which only 12 not in Australia, & 29 «(some of them unaltered forms frm old temp: antarctic land. Yes)» not Europe; & 39 not in Antarctic⇑lines 15—11annotation‹(Q) p xxxii.› ( ‹(as well as in nmbr of genera)› Therefore I infer N. Zealand in species, as well as «such» genera«as» Fuchsia & Calceolaria, more allied to S. America than is Australia X?t01) bottom-marginannotation⧟ Have you lists ? Xt02 of those 89 common «v (Q) p XXXII. —(17/76 of th genera to which these 89 species belong, are confined to New Zealand (ienotAustralia) & America. «∴ are not Arctic.» see Q. p. XXXII This shows, again, much affinity betwen N. Zealand & America) — It clearly is not transport direct frm S. America to New Zealand which has caused affinity.» to N. Ze. & S. Amer. there are 29 not in Europe; «(How many of thesenotfd. N. of Equator?) see opposite page for 7 «of th 29» species; are there more?» which are these? are thy N. Asian, «or almost mundane except Europe» «1 is N. Asian» or are they all southern forms.

⇑line 9at "4" annotation(These seem all world to me but wd require cold) ⇑line 9at "species" annotationcome direct to Aust from North ⇑line 9at "etc" annotationAre these all Australian?t01 (p XXXII, 17 may have come by Sea.) top-marginannotationAre many of th 60 Eurpean species Annuals

lines 22—24double scoreline 23underline "land ... between"lines 22—27annotationie in negative point of view, which wd. be vry strng if we knew means of transport.—lines 22—26annotationXt01 R. Brown has said some survived. Gulf-Seas

⇑lines 8—4score⇑line 4underline "Carex ... natans"⇑line 4at "Pyrenaica" annotation⧟ Have these become «since» extinct in Australia or have they arrived by other route: Australia has many European plants not fd in New Zealand.

line 20at "these" annotationantarctic lines 20—24annotationbut not genera fd. exclusively in South line 20at "50" annotationgenera line 22underline "Drosera"lines 22—24annotationsuch genera may be reprentativ, from alteration in North.

top-marginannotationXt01 Would you mark genera fd only S. of S. Tropics with S. ---- only N. of Tropics with N. Excepting mntains within Tropics Would you mark th Genera not fd. North of ‹Equator›t02 «S. Tropics»t03 ? wd it not have made it much more interestng if th identical specis had been put in .