UFO Research: The Developing Approach

UFO research must be turned into a more interactive – experimental activity. Let’s not only continue with a reaffirmation of old paradigms and techniques used. And this does not mean by any means abandoning objectivity and rationality. Working with some “contactees” could be very useful to obtain evidence, although most scientific-minded analysts are not even interested in this.And we can also work as participatory scientists as anthropologists capable of gathering objective evidence and personal insight through greater immersion with a different civilization. An expanded ufological methodology based upon a respectful participatory attitude is the key.

This is not something completely new but is something that I’m resonating with. And it can be refined and improved. And consciousness connects across reality levels and across the vast distances and crisscrossing eons of spacetime. Dr. Steven Greer has been training persons in a CE-5 approach with various degrees of success and there always is room for improvements.

Going out with electronic detection equipment and with night shot and infrared as well as with a team of witnesses and investigators sufficiently trained to make observations objectively and respectful of the contact’s techniques and beliefs of successful contactees could be productive. Practically, a more complete experimental method that reflects the subjective-objective interconnected nature of the interactive phenomenon. It would be great if the opportunity for working in CE-5s and also with highly successful contactees arose for capable scientists like Mr. Mark D’Antonio, developer of the UFOTOG device.

Let us try not to disdain people who claim to have contacts especially if there is enough evidence or reasonable hints that they are indeed interacting with a conventionally unknown phenomenon. The scenario that recognizes the possibility that there are some serious and credible contacts capable of coming up with evidence should not be forgotten. It does not matter if they speak of spiritual aspects that they try to interpret in their own way also under their own limitations and prejudices. We need to stop judging in an irrational manner to support a rational approach. And let’s try to be respectful of their beliefs and practices as well.

I think the next step in UFOLOGY is about our own consciousnesses willing to thread itself into a larger fabric of information or a universal participatory information matrix. As the Buddhists say, we do not exist in isolation. Isolation is a false view that binds us. And many quantum theories like the Quantum Hologram Theory of Consciousness resonates with this. Therefore, there should be a more interactive stage, equally involving subjectivity and objectivity in balance with each other, one in which objectivity is born in the kernel of subjectivity and vice versa and there should not just be a greater accumulation of photographic evidence, testimonials, documentation, and the like.

We can very well spend another 70 years with inconclusive awareness and knowledge about the “unknowns,” or instead interact with them more intimately and know more about them under a new subjective-objective scientific approach…creating a new paradigm or procedure to disclose what we are dealing with. Discovering that -in essence – we are co-equals…making “them” more inclined to manifest more overtly.

Although purely objective investigation is highly valid and important too many decades have passed without establishing or officially proving to the public a possible ET presence or taking the issue with the rigor and seriousness it deserves; a rigor so intense that it must also include the consciousness based, subjective characteristics also often associated with sightings, along with its “high strangeness.” Lest we do this, “science” will remain as a covert belief system, in its polarizing, attitudinal, anti superstition infancy.

Thus, the move towards a more integrative paradigm that opens up to multiple physical, extradimensional, mental and spiritual factors with science and ethics is the more rational approach because it reflects the connectivity about which the UFO phenomenon at large is telling us. Our research should reflect a greater understanding of integration and connection.

Then, in greater sync with its subjective aspects that appear to be involved in a more advanced form of modification of time and space, let’s acquire more interactive evidence. For instance, repeatedly asking for maneuvers or effects that can be filmed under different angles, with EM spectrum devices and the like. I think that the more we behave as a coherent collective (especially for starters within the forefront of UFO research), the more we will gain a credible status of political sovereignty before the eyes of “the others” (that seem to have always been part of us).

Thus, we would be signaling to cosmic intelligence a greater intuitive and conceptual understanding of the inherent unity and interconnectedness all around/within us. And I think that we need to be willing to share the results openly with no strings attached other than a fair and precise reporting with little ego and – as much as possible – no UFO researcher infighting involved. Is that too much to ask for?

UFO over a gentleman in the town of Huanuco, Peru…1943Scientists Mark D’Antonio and his UFOTOG wide array detector

A photo of one of my contactee friends, Jose María Fernandez Martinez. 1995. Taken in Guayama, Puerto Rico. He told me about the importance of resonance and of working with the conscious and subconscious methods and interpretive medium/language that resonate with the intelligences behind genuine, otherworldly, UFO phenomena. If we worked like this, I’m sure that a greater degree of success and exopolitical understanding would ensue.

Giorgio Piacenza

After a clear UFO sighting with multiple witnesses within 300 feet in the Peruvian coastal town of "Chilca" in 1975, I participated with the Mission Rahma contact group and befriended several contactees from this and other contact efforts. I also researched many aspects of the UFO phenomenon for several decades and feel inclined to contribute in the confluence of philosophical and scientific perspectives.

Comment

ShaunS

It’s not a science experiment, it’s clearly military. Are they biological or robotic? The speed of light barrier would favour robotic life forms ruled by an A.I. (Mother Mary, nuking Mars, doing Fatima).

What you need to do is capture one of them. Cattle mutilations mean that the cattle can be used as bate. Crashes due to Radar, imply that their power systems can be knocked out which is fairly consistent with the idea of them being robotic. So set a trap, capture them, knock them out, study them and publish the results. This is what you need to do, otherwise the conquest of earth and the selective breeding will continue.