"...the old ones by the door
..Their heads to their chests,
They told lies ..."
- Eric Taylor

02/12/2014

Finding Crazy Horse: Little Bighorn in Context

As we discussed earlier, historian's estimates seem to cluster around a probable median American death toll of around 500 soldiers and civilians at the Battle of the Little Bighorn. The European American toll was certainly around 260 and the Native American toll was probably, not certainly, between 200 and 300. The battle became a symbol for psycho-logical justification of European American desires for westward expansion of railroads, ranching, farming and mining; that being somewhat similar to the way that The Alamo instantly became a rallying cry for Texas freedom.

We have also discussed Sharpsburg (1862) and Gettysburg (1863). Sharpsburg (the victors call it the Battle of Antietam Creek) was the bloodiest day in American history, with 23,000 American casualties, and included the bloodiest hour in American history. Gettysburg is considered to be the bloodiest battle in American history with 51,000 American casualties over three days. It is estimated that 750,000 American men died as a result of The War Between the States.

In World War I, during the first Battle of the Somme in 1916, more than a million British, French and German soldiers were killed.

Total human losses attributed to World War II are variously estimated as between 50 million and 80 million souls. In World War II, loss of military and civilian life is estimated as follows: the United States lost around 460,000, the Germans lost almost 8 million, the Japanese over 2 million dead, and the Russians lost around 27 million dead.

In their American War, the Vietnamese lost 2 million civilian lives and 1 million soldiers fighting for their freedom. There were 58,220 U. S. armed services personnel killed in this conflict.

As to historic invading armies and resulting rape and pillage, the standard for comparison is Genghis Khan and his Mongol hordes. According to Ian Frazier in Travels in Siberia, "By the time of Genghis's death in 1227, the Mongols had subdued northern China, middle Asia, the Crimea, and the norther Caucasus; their empire stretched from the Caspian to the Pacific. In the process, they had killed tens of millions of people--more than eighteen million in China alone, over one and a half million in the Central Asian city of Herat, according to contemporary historians."

On the rape score, Frazier states further that "A Persian historian writing about the Mongols in 1260 said that by then the Mongol leader had twenty thousand descendants living," and that DNA testing of males in Central Asia conducted recently by geneticists from Oxford University revealed that 8 percent of the men "indicated descent from a single common ancestor about a thousand years ago." They concluded that this equivalent of 1/2 of 1% of the world's male population is descended from Genghis Khan.

But back in America, Leslie Marmon Silko states in her 1992 book, The Almanac of the Dead (conspicuously published 500 years after Columbus' "discovery") "Sixty million Native Americans died between 1500 and 1600". Silko has her sources but European American researchers cannot agree.

If a single being perishes without living out a full life, it is a tragedy? Does it really matter where we place the decimal in any of these preceding numbers?

It is all simply unspeakable.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

If you have a comment, and/or an argument, please do so below. Feedback is welcome.

If you have a comment, and/or an argument, please do so below. Feedback is welcome.
If you enjoyed this post, take a few seconds to subscribe. Use the Social Media Sharing buttons below to share it with your friends.

Comments

Finding Crazy Horse: Little Bighorn in Context

As we discussed earlier, historian's estimates seem to cluster around a probable median American death toll of around 500 soldiers and civilians at the Battle of the Little Bighorn. The European American toll was certainly around 260 and the Native American toll was probably, not certainly, between 200 and 300. The battle became a symbol for psycho-logical justification of European American desires for westward expansion of railroads, ranching, farming and mining; that being somewhat similar to the way that The Alamo instantly became a rallying cry for Texas freedom.

We have also discussed Sharpsburg (1862) and Gettysburg (1863). Sharpsburg (the victors call it the Battle of Antietam Creek) was the bloodiest day in American history, with 23,000 American casualties, and included the bloodiest hour in American history. Gettysburg is considered to be the bloodiest battle in American history with 51,000 American casualties over three days. It is estimated that 750,000 American men died as a result of The War Between the States.

In World War I, during the first Battle of the Somme in 1916, more than a million British, French and German soldiers were killed.

Total human losses attributed to World War II are variously estimated as between 50 million and 80 million souls. In World War II, loss of military and civilian life is estimated as follows: the United States lost around 460,000, the Germans lost almost 8 million, the Japanese over 2 million dead, and the Russians lost around 27 million dead.

In their American War, the Vietnamese lost 2 million civilian lives and 1 million soldiers fighting for their freedom. There were 58,220 U. S. armed services personnel killed in this conflict.

As to historic invading armies and resulting rape and pillage, the standard for comparison is Genghis Khan and his Mongol hordes. According to Ian Frazier in Travels in Siberia, "By the time of Genghis's death in 1227, the Mongols had subdued northern China, middle Asia, the Crimea, and the norther Caucasus; their empire stretched from the Caspian to the Pacific. In the process, they had killed tens of millions of people--more than eighteen million in China alone, over one and a half million in the Central Asian city of Herat, according to contemporary historians."

On the rape score, Frazier states further that "A Persian historian writing about the Mongols in 1260 said that by then the Mongol leader had twenty thousand descendants living," and that DNA testing of males in Central Asia conducted recently by geneticists from Oxford University revealed that 8 percent of the men "indicated descent from a single common ancestor about a thousand years ago." They concluded that this equivalent of 1/2 of 1% of the world's male population is descended from Genghis Khan.

But back in America, Leslie Marmon Silko states in her 1992 book, The Almanac of the Dead (conspicuously published 500 years after Columbus' "discovery") "Sixty million Native Americans died between 1500 and 1600". Silko has her sources but European American researchers cannot agree.

If a single being perishes without living out a full life, it is a tragedy? Does it really matter where we place the decimal in any of these preceding numbers?

It is all simply unspeakable.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

If you have a comment, and/or an argument, please do so below. Feedback is welcome.

Because of extra rain and snow received in the Northern Chihuahua Desert during the winter, the desert wildflower climax this spring is said by some to be a 100 year event. These photos were taken as we entered Big Bend NP from Marathon with the Chisos Mountains in the background; then on the Cattail Falls Trail below the Window, and finally along the River Road from Lajitas to Presidio. Photos by Tom Thom (Canon G11 and iPhone 4S)