Saturday, December 30, 2006

I thought I’d seen it all, or at least most of it. Now there’s a web site for little girls. Not pedophiles, but for girls. At least that’s what the pedophiles want it to look like. Gee what a cute little web site with pink colors and pretty flowers and hearts.

Wow, they say nice things like, “Being pretty means having pretty ideas, thoughts and feelings.”And don’t forget, “If you like the graphics on this website, you can download them here for free! Neither the flower symbol nor the Special Friendship Symbol are copyrighted (I made them just for you!)”

Aww, isn’t that nice. They made that just for me!! There’s even a links section with links to cool girl and teen magazines and even educational sites. Oooh, and one to help me with my homework.

Ok, now for a reality check.

The links section may be titled “Special links for special girls”, but it has links to:

~ sites that promote removing age restrictions for sex

~ instructions on how to disable parental blocking software (for those kids who want to surf porn sites)

~ A link to “Older Man Love”- where a girl talks about her attraction to older men

~ And a site for “teens who are sexually active now or just thinking about having sex. It's called "Just Say Yes" because we're tired of people telling us what we can and can't do.”

Now for the real shocker. What Is Touching?

“You may have learned about good touching and bad touching. Probably you have been told that touching in the private parts of your body is ‘bad touching’. This is not always the case. This kind of touching is only ‘bad touching’ if you do not want to do it or do not feel comfortable with it.”

“A girl and a loving adult can form a very special bond, as the adult provides experience and knowledge, and the girl provides a fresh way of seeing the world and her excitement for life.”

They then go on to describe what kinds of touching are legal to do with your “special friend” and how to do it.

There’s a glossary that explains what words mean. “Consenting means that both people understand what they are doing and accept the responsibilities of doing it so that they can enjoy the fun of touching each other.” They go on to talk about how a child molester is a bad and selfish person, but a girllover has a “special appreciation” for young girls.

There are messages from young girls on the site. One is from an 11year old who asks about her much older boyfriend and what to do about her Mommy who doesn’t want her to see him anymore.

Here’s one of the responses from the site to this 11 year old girl:

“When adults find out that a child has been having consensual sex, they don't rush to support the child. They try to brainwash them. To convince them that what they enjoyed was actually a bad thing. That can't be done without also giving the impression that ALL sex is bad. You can have amazing experiences with an older person without risking all that.”

They have gone too far. I can just picture my niece stumbling across this pretty little web site. This is why parents absolutely have to have parental controls on their computer. Not just on their main web browser software, but something that covers internet explorer as well. Your children are at risk. You need to take precautions and monitor everything they do.

Friday, December 22, 2006

This story includes warnings from the London Child Abuse Investigation Command regarding paedophile activities online. Detectives state that social networking sites such as MySpace are being abused by paedophiles. From the article:

The type of pedophile also varied, according to Detective Constable Jonathan Taylor, a covert officer who pretends to be a 12-year-old girl during often long and painstaking inquiries.

All are white and usually aged between 30 and 50. But they can be family men, loners, grandfathers and professionals.

They target children by asking to be their online "friend" with most youngsters inundated with dozens of such requests every day.

One pedophile they monitored had around 300 "buddy" profiles, all of which were young girls, Taylor said.

The story profiles a recent case in which a "predatory pedophile" hit on a '12 year old girl' who turned out to be a detective at the CAIC. Well, I think this predator now officially qualifies as one of these:

This bill would increase the reporting standards for child pornography and obscenity against children. In other words....no more graphic, written descriptions of having sex with babies on Live Journal. Anyone hosting a website, a blog, a message board etc, would be required to report someone for posting such.

Millions of commercial Web sites and personal blogs would be required to report illegal images or videos posted by their users or pay fines of up to $300,000, if a new proposal in the U.S. Senate came into law.

After child pornography or some forms of "obscenity" are found and reported, the Web site must retain any "information relating to the facts or circumstances" of the incident for at least six months. Webmasters would be immune from civil and criminal liability if they followed the specified procedures exactly.

In addition to the provisions relating to child pornography, the bill also would ensure that sex offenders will register information relevant to their online activities on sex offender registries. Specifically, it would require sex offenders to register their email addresses, as well as their instant messaging and chat room handles and any other online identifiers they use. If a sex offender failed to do so, he could be prosecuted, convicted, and thrown into jail for up to 10 years. The bill would also make the use of the Internet in the commission of a crime of child exploitation an aggravating factor that would add 10 years to the offender’s sentence.

WOWZA! This bill, if passed will have massive, far-reaching effects on the online pedofreak community! No longer can blogger say "It's not our business what people write, or images bloggers use. " NO, no, Blogger themselves will be held responsible if they don't follow a specific set of rules. Pedo message boards won't be able to simply DELETE a risque comment, no they will have to save the information AND report it themselves. Does that strike anyone as...well, quite funny? It does me. Actually I got rather tickled about it. Wonder what the pedofreaks have to say about it. First let's look at what a pedo-apologist has to say....

"This constitutionally dubious proposal is being made apparently mostly based on fear or political considerations rather than on the facts," said EFF's Bankston. Studies by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children show the online sexual solicitation of minors has dropped in the past five years, despite the growth of social-networking services, he said.

That was from Kevin Bankston an attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation (and former ACLU attorney). He's used a typical pedo-trick. Partial fact stated in such a way that it gives the reader a false impression. Here are the facts from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children 2006 Youth Internet Safety Survey (in comparison to the 2001 survey)

A smaller proportion of youth Internet users received sexual solicitations. In YISS-1, 19% received such solicitations, and in YISS-2, 13% received such solicitations. Plus a smaller proportion of youth Internet users were visiting chatrooms and communicating online with people they did not know in person. These findings suggest youth Internet users may be more aware of the risky nature of online encounters with such people.

The Internet remains a source of disturbing and offensive solicitations for many youth.

Even though a smaller proportion of youth Internet users received sexual solicitations, the proportion with the most serious incidents, aggressive and distressing solicitations, did not decline.

The extent of unwanted exposure to sexual material among youth is extraordinarily high and grew between the times YISS-1 and YISS-2 were conducted. Approximately one third of youth Internet users (34%) had an unwanted exposure to sexual material in the past year, an increase from 25% in YISS-1 that occurred despite increases in the number of families using filtering, blocking, or monitoring software

Now, let's take a look at the pedo-chatters. I don't think we'll find any surprises here.

The Walker: many sex offenders these days are only on the sex offenders registry because they were found guilty of possessing child pornography...Nor is there any compelling evidence that I am aware of that looking at sexual oriented pictures of children inevitably leads to the sexual molestation of children. It is my personal opinion that simply viewing images does not in any meaningful way imply one is an actual sex offender of the sort that needs constant surveilance.....I definitely don't feel that because someone looks at CP pictures but is not actively involved on the production end of the business they should be regarded as a sex offender.

Joey Bishop: How many kids in Southeast Asia did John McCain drop bombs on in an unjust and unneccesary war? IMHO, shooting kids with semen is far more morally just than shooting them with bullets.

Seamus: I lost the little bit of respect that I had for him after reading this; he is simply pandering to people's fears that something might happen to their kids. This is as cynical and exploitative as it gets.

Turtle: this is not really a strike at predators. it is a thinly veiled attack on all child lovers,whether they have been convicted for breaking the laws or not. its simple biggotry. they aim to ban us all from the net,which is insane considering most of us dont seek minors online...

Let your voice be heard, write your Senator today and let him know how you feel about this. And why.

Wednesday, December 13, 2006

Apparently a new commenter here by the name of Dididiot thinks it is. Hmm, perhaps it is to him..... all just a game, I mean.

So, I'm going to explain a little about how it relates back to my previous post about Pedo Logic. How in noticing the frequency of folks entering AZ through a google search for that term, followed by Dididiot's idiotic comments concerning an AZ member's blog, and a famous writer.....I thought more about this. I thought about the sick feeling I get in the pit of my stomach when I see someone come here through a search for

Now, I'm quite sure that anyone googling those phrases were NOT wanting to find AZ. But I bet the people who found us searching for the following were.

"How to tell if husband is pedophile"and"What if your child is a pedophile"or"How long average pedo spends in prison"

We are a relatively 'young' blog in the scheme of things. 6 months old and we've had 50,000 hits here. That's nothing to sneeze at. We must be doing something right. And there must be a LOT of people out there concerned about pedophilia.... and that should concern us. Either pedofreaks looking for something they shouldn't be looking for, trying to find an 'anti' to start a brawl with, or out trying to promote kiddie perving. But we also have people who are very troubled. Either because of their own past experiences with pedofreaks, or their own current experiences or interest in child safety.

Another search term is Pedo or a Pedo-Combo I call it. You have your standard Pedophile, Paedophile, Paedosexual, Pedo, Paedo and then the multi combos come in.

BoyLove 11 year oldandBoylove 10 year oldandBoyLove 12 year old....etc

Then out of the blue a really interesting one pops up....

"reasons why an inmate doesn't like child molester"

Well, I'll be darned! Someone had to do a search for that? It was obviously a pedofreak, as no NORMAL person would have to ask why.

Sometimes we get searches for familiar names, ie Rookieeeee, Lindsay, Todd with an occasional olive freak thrown in for good measure. We also had 63 entries from the search term 'Kaylor' over a 3 day period, but I don't count that because they all came from Kaylor. Interestingly enough there's not been one single entry from a search for Dididiot. Or Didaskalos either for that matter.

So, no. This isn't a game. We're serious. Dead serious. Dididiot and any of his pedo pals should understand this. There's a lot of serious people out there. And there's very few of you in comparison. Oh yeah yeah I know what you all say about your numbers. That's Pedo Logic.

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

One day I noticed that we were getting a lot of visitors to AZ through a Google search for the term Pedo Logic. At first I thought it rather strange but then I realized that none of us understand pedofreaks logic, probably even they don't understand it. So I thought we'd talk a bit about Pedo Logic and what it really is.

We all realize these guys are missing something, we don't understand why they can't comprehend and accept basic concepts. So, I figure it's like this. They can't accept that they are wacko, because they build these scenarios up in their heads, they say to themselves "I WANT IT and I will talk myself into circles until I find a way to make it fit. I will FORCE it to make sense SOMEHOW!" Which is where the nodding pedo heads come in. (HT to Jacey!) They don't really care if it makes sense, or if it's accurate, or if it's true, they just agree if someone says something that they want to be true.

So what does Pedo Logic look like? I'm going to give you three examples.

Sample Pedo Logic #1

A perving on kiddies housekeeper, he's got a thing for the daughter of his employers. When the boss is away ... the perv comes out to play. He starts by invading the little girls space. He goes through her room, he touches her belongings, he strips her of her privacy. He gets bolder and bolder, he starts to sniff her panties. He steals her panties. He becomes obsessed. He stops doing his job and just hangs out in her room. The little girl is unaware of this. In fact this little girl is even unaware of the birds and the bees, she likes her Barbies and her Dora the Explorer. She likes Saturday cartoons and Disney movies. She's just a kid, she gets to be carefree that way. But the perving on kiddies dude, sees her smile at him. And he's spent so much time in her space, with her underwear, fantasizing about her, wanting her that well he just doesn't see this as an innocent smile. NO NO What we've got here is a 5 year old girl who wants to get in his pants.

WA LA Pedo Logic.

Sample Pedo Logic #2

The little girl is playing, oh maybe doing some back flips or some such as that. Sometimes her panties show, or her blouse flips up. She doesn't even notice it. She's just this carefree kid, playing her game. But she looks up with the little girl face - the only face she has - she's happy, she's smiling, laughing, innocent. But the person watching her isn't like normal men. No, he's a perverted piece of shit who views the world through a distorted pedo-lens. What have we got? A 5 year old flashing him, because she wants sex with him.

WA LA Pedo Logic.

Sample Pedo Logic #3

Here we have a typical freakopath. He has 14 apples, 33 oranges, 65 grapes, 8 pineapples and 6 bananas. He adds them altogether. Divides by 7 cups of coffee, multiplies by 3 sodas, and subtracts 2 beers. What has he got? A 5 year old girl who wants to play with his genitals.

WA LA Pedo Logic.

So... now you know about PedoLogic. Please leave the samples you've run across in the comments!

Paedophiles are notorious for making blatantly stupid allegations rather than an actual argument. The most recent example of this is the infantile claim that the fairy in the artwork on Daydreamer of Oz is a child. The first allegation was made here by Didaskalos who says:

Though why anyone who was trying to project an "anti-ped" image would feature a naked 12-year old girl-elf on their homepage is beyond me.

Well like all paedo lies, it spread like wildfire. Psychotic Bill Evans decided to jump on the bandwagon and rant and rave at BoyChat about the image. He goes even farther than Didaskalos, claiming that the fairy is 8. Even when a fellow paedophile tells him he's wrong, he continues:

The physical proportions...of an 8 y/o are quite different to an adult in the length of the torso, limbs and head size. The proportions of the female in that sketch are much closer to those of an 8 y/o than those of an adult. Probably sub-conciously so, but still those proportions would tend to draw the eye of a CL considerably more than of a "normal". The "boobie" could even be the right hand, and not a boobie at all...

As an attempted swipe at me, these comments do not concern me in the least. However, the creator of this artwork - Selina Fenech - is an amazing artist who does not deserve to have her work slandered and misinterpreted in this way.

Therefore, I contacted Selina and alerted her to this issue. The title of this piece of work is Rockabye in the Treetops and can be found in Selina's gallery here.

Reproduced with permission, is Selina's response to these allegations:

The artwork Rockabye in the Treetops is definately, and I think quite clearly, not a child. I don't generally age my fairies, but if I had toI'd say she was no less than 17-18 human years old, which is in fact the age I was when I drew this artwork.

Now would you paedophiles please stop making me prove you wrong? I've got a lot of packing to do.

And Bill - those libel laws that you're so fond of and clearly don't understand - I'd um steer clear of them if I were you.

We had a visitor yesterday from the University of Colorado. He called himself "AZ sucks my a$$ " and he left us a little present. Some lyrics from the rock group Pungent Stench, titled Rex Paedophilus. Now I just simply cannot repeat all the lyrics here, but I did leave his comment, if you have the stomach to read them they are located here

And here's a small sampling of the other lyrics from 'Pungent Stench'

Suffer The Little Children To Come Unto Mechildhe's coming for youthere's nothing that you could do

he lurks the nighta ghoul with cruel intentionswaiting for you to cross his waya predator

The Testament Of Stench

the works of the flesh are manifestindeed our goal supremeadultery is advisablefornication a virtuedefinite uncleanness and sexual lasciviousnessthe most beautiful ever

School's Out ForeversometimesI wake up in the middle of the nightvoices in my head trying to ignitethe burning hate that's driving me insanegrabs my mind and strikes my soul with pain

These lyrics praise sexual addiction, shooting kids in a classroom, raping babies and more more more. Now, whether or not this group of scum have the right to produce and sell music with those lyrics, is not the topic of this post. The topic IS....someone at the University of Colorado is using their internet resources to post pro-pedophilia information. Is this acceptable?

Absolutely not. I will be sure to update you with the University's stand on the issue.

Thursday, December 07, 2006

"I AM A PERSON WHO SEXUALLY OFFENDED OTHERS"

According to Hulann and so beautifully outted by Iluv2surf. I do believe we need to talk more about this. You see, Hulann states:

It's true that I was convicted in 1994 of Aggrivated Criminal Sexual Abuse for Masterbating in front of a 10-year-old boy my Y.F. at the time- The cops had nothing on me until I myself volunteered the information in a police interview which lead to the only evidence they had on me. Such a dumb person I was then by not retaining a lawyer for the police questioning and thinking that the boy would tell all or they would keep at him until he did - He told nothing as I later found out but too late for me to take back my words.

I was sentenced to 2 years probation and ordered to undergo Therapy for Sex Offenders...

this post insn't about the Suicide attempts made durring the 5.5 years of Therapy this post is to state why I am not a SEX OFFENDER.

the thearpist wanted it to be drilled into us that the term SEX OFFENDER is only a label that one can not change but a person that has SEXUALLY OFFENDED OTHERS can change because it describes an act that a person can change and doesn't place Label on that person that he can not escape from.

Well I reckon that's applicable to lots of people, eh? Scott Peterson wasn't a murderer!!! Hey Hey! He was just a person who murdered his wife and unborn baby!!!! Kenneth Lay wasn't a thief!!! Oh no, he was just someone who stole from others! And doggone it, even Ted Bundy wasn't a rapist! He just raped women and girls. John Couey wasn't a child molester! He was just a man who molested children. Dear God, we could go on and on. This is brilliant! The ultimate PC criminal lingo!

Wonder what the nodding pedo heads have to say about it?

grahamsworld:

Your life was totally ruined and turned into a living nightmare for an act which was certainly a victimless crime.

Parents and caregivers who physically abuse their children, who beat them, neglect them, starve them, isolate them and turn them into angry, rebellious teenagers are tolerated by Society and the Law, yet a harmless act like this is given penalties harsher than some convicted of manslaughter receive.

2 years probation? Ok.

Nickless:

This is why I don't give a damn...about people, society, others, "humans in general". Most people would condemn you, Hulann, even now. I choose to condemn your condemners. What you have gone through, I can only imagine. I try to picture myself in your past situation, in the bowels of the "justice" system; and all I see is a rage so vast that the murder and mayhem that would follow is unspeakable.

hangtwenty:

...I have no idea where you are exactly, but if your case hinges on the word of one person against your word..without any other witnesses or charges.... then any decent lawyer should get you off..!

apollo11:

Reading posts like this really make me angry.

Especially when you consider everything you went through that changed you're entire life around (one might say for the worst) just because you wanked off in front of a kid.

So friggin what? Think about it... You masturbated in front of a kid and you get all that

Hulann:

I didn't go into to it yet but another part of that Group session greeting besides saying You have SEXUALLY OFFENDED OTHERS was to talk about how if not stoped the possibility of Escalation of abuse.

Yes, I can say 100 percent I wanted things between me and the 10 year-old to go further and it prob. would have

Here's an idea. You can call an apple an orange, but guess what? It's still an apple and a pedovore is still a pedovore whether you call them pedophile, MAA, or childlover. Heck, I reckon you could call them oranges too if you wanted. Why don't you start a campaign.... Here's a slogan you can use

Monday, December 04, 2006

Dunx alerted us here to a filthy paedophile site hosted on LJ. Since that time, we have been in contact with LJ regarding this issue. I am happy to report that LiveJournal appears to be taking the standards of their content very seriously. In their response to me they state:

LiveJournal has a strict zero tolerance policy regarding child pornography and/or direct solicitation of minors. We encourage all of our users to report such material to us as they discover it, and we take swift action to remove it when it is reported to us.

The account that Dunx alerted us to has indeed been removed, LJ explains:

In this case, the material you have reported to us has crossed the line into specifically soliciting and advocating illegal acts, and therefore we are able to suspend the accounts in question.

We are now in the process of investigating all of the people who were associated with that particular blog.

Our campaign to have the filth removed from LiveJournal is ongoing. Please feel free to contact/alert us to any inappropriate material you find and we will certainly keep you updated on our progress.

What a load of crap.I wish I was making that up, because it sounds like a comedy routine. Can you see it now? Leno, or Robin Williams, or Dave Chappelle, standing in front of an audience, doing a bit about something like this? Sometimes, life really is stranger than fiction. Floyd, I hope you get your just rewards in prison... bitch.

Sunday, December 03, 2006

Quite a lot, it seems. We have recently come under attack in this post at BoyChat regarding the quote you see in the header by Kahlil Gibran. The thrust of the argument is this: Gibran may have been groomed and molested as a child by F. Holland Day; he subsequently became successful as an adult. Therefore we at Absolute Zero condone and promote ‘boylove’ because we appreciate Gibran's work.

“Kaylor” declares that he’s paid us his ‘first’ visit and is simply appalled that we would use any of Gibran’s work. He goes so far as to claim:

Through this cap-quote and its citation, "Absolute Zero" has made, in their ignorance, one of the strongest cases for pederasty ever formulated, a case for its beneficial impact on the young, its importance to culture, and its timelessness.

The reasoning behind his argument is this:

Kahlil Gibran (Gibran Khalil Gibran; 1883-1931) was the *loved boy* of the preeminent American Uranian photographer, Fred Holland Day (1864-1933)

Fact or opinion?

I personally chose that quote and feel no need to justify my choice or its use to the likes of “Kaylor” or anyone else at BoyChat. However, for the benefit of our dedicated readers, I offer the following:

Firstly, there is NO evidence that Day had an inappropriate relationship with any child. In fact, the F. Holland Day Museum denies the claims outright on their "common errors" page:

There is no evidence that Day had a sexual relationship with any of his models. Although Jussim implied that such relationships were possible and others have perpetuated this assumption

Secondly, there has never been so much as an accusation that Gibran himself was a paedophile; we know for a fact that he was not. So it comes down to their claim that Day “made” Gibran what he became. This is utterly absurd conjecture. By all acounts, the most important influences in his life were women!

Gibran was possibly groomed and molested as a child but managed (through his own brilliance) to become a successful man. Does that make our use of his words inappropriate? To the contrary, I cannot think of anything more appropriate.

The psychotic child molester Bill Evans seemed to think that this information would come as a revelation to us and the quote would be removed.

I will simply say that this is not ‘new information’ to me or anyone else here at Absolute Zero. We knew it was possible that Gibran was groomed as a child which added meaning rather than detracted from its use.

Should anyone have further questions/grievances regarding the use of this quote, I suggest you read through the available information on Gibran (not Day – it was not his words that I used). Alternatively, you can leave a comment here or drop me an email to discuss the matter further.

Friday, December 01, 2006

This is Rookiee, aka Damien Roberto Andres Cole of Pomona, California. He is a pedophile. He likes little boys. He thinks the age of consent for sex should be lowered. Cole, whose online handle is Rookiee Revolyob, is one of the internet’s most dangerous pedophiles. Besides maintaining online journals advocating child molestation, he hosts a podcast which praises pedophilia, sex with the underaged, and child rape.

He is an active member of various online forums, one of which is called “boychat” and on which he shares his depraved thoughts about little boys. His online name, Revolyob, translates in English into “boylover” when spelled backwards.

In addition to his internet activities, his MySpace page reveals that he is engaged in a relationship with a young boy, one he has been manipulating since the child was ten years old. His pedophile associates have gone so far as to accuse him of collecting child pornography and there are unconfirmed reports that he may be under federal investigation for his activities.

We urge you to take extreme caution in dealing with Mr. Cole. Most importantly, please keep your children away from him. He is known to frequent Disneyland and Renaissance Fairs in the area, and represents a definite danger.

Do kids even have time to be kids and experience that which you and I, now in our 50's or 60's now, managed to experience years ago?

You've all seen the internet e-mails. And despite them, I tend to agree: we elders came from a generation not familiar to those living now.

-- I didn't have to fear my peers;-- I didn't have to fear my neighbors;-- I didn't have to fear my community;-- I didn't have to fear my city or my county;-- I didn't have to fear my government at all.

Now, if I'm interpreting things properly, I have to fear everyone and everything I come in contact with.

About

A community of individuals pledged to fight paedophiles on the web. We are committed to the safety and emotional well-being of all children. This site will serve as a resource for those committed to our fight wherever you may be in the world.