So what you guys are wanting is limited access on public lands. If you've been watching what this administration has been emphasizing, more public access, you've got a long hard uphill battle ahead of you.

Besides, there already are limited amount of antlerless tags available on a DMU basis. Whether or not you agree with the amount of tags available is another matter, but with the exception of the CWD units, there are not infinite amounts of antlerless tags available.

This isn't a deer hunting or deer management issue any longer. It is a people management issue.

Boy that's hard. Even at 60deer/square mile you have less than 1 deer per 10 or 5 acres. Pretty unrealistic to expect great hunting on this limited amout of property. Glad somedays I don't work for the DNR dealing with people with these expectations

Bullwinkle, that's so true. We don't invade the most popular bedding areas unless we're cutting wood. Get a kick out of all the guys that think you need vast sanctuary acreage that you never ever walk unless it's to drag out a mature buck. We get a crack at a big one or two every year or two and hunt pretty hard with family and friends bow and gun seasons and take some adult does and the occasional eater doe fawn too. More than enough deer on managed woodland. That's not the case on the tracts of nearby public land which is hit hard. The time to separate public and private doe tags is past due but still not too late to help out.