1

2

Interesting replies. For me, the main aspect is the erotic feeling. But I think there are too many dumb mistakes made in the cumshot. One contributer has already mentioned the guy standing there and wanking himself into her mouth. I hate that! Surely its a much bigger turn-on for the GIRL to jack the guy off (in a seusual, erotic manner)
Others have mentioned fake cum. Often seen on 'tugjob queens'. Even worse is when there's hardly any cum at all - a few drops of pathetic, clear fluid.
Thick, turgid cum is a sure indicater the guy hasn't jacked for a few days, and his jack isn't tiresome hard work, but a real 'loss of control' type eruption. The ejaculation should be a moment where the guy, brought to a horny frenzy by the hot babe, loses control and can't help erupting his load.
Anotehr thing that pisses me off is the amount of times the guy's dick waves around, and the sperm goes everyone except on the intended target.

3

The important thing for me is not the setting, but how well thought-out it is. Scenes should have good lighting, tasteful attractive background (not too intrusive), and have room for models and camera people to move and do their stuff comfortably. Putting the scene against a wall, or even worse, in a corner, is a total no-no; it restricts the camera angles enormously. Yet how many 'dumb cunt' sites make this kind of mistake? Heaps! Office scenes are okay, providing they get rid of those fucking stiletoes early.
I find background & setting just as important as the venue. Eg Outdoors in a beautiful wooded forest is much better than on a car bonnet. I like living room scenes, myself. But too many scenes have aweful decor or a complete mess in the background.
Only one setting I don't like - the shower. There's nowhere comfortable for the participants to sit/lie, etc; showers are cramped and difficult to get gtood camera angles, and the water washes away the vaginal lubricants, as well as the cum. I can't understand why so many people think the shower's such a great turn-on.

4

5

My main interest in a model is how she come across. Stats tell you nothing about her general erotic appeal. The main thing that catches me about a model is her smile, and if she looks like she's having fun. Stats and profile details cannot meaure this.

6

I have to admit that POV is a genre I detest. It's not so much that you don't see the whole scene; it's the perspective that's warped. Huge mouth & face, and no pussy views. The other problem with POV is that it puts the guy at the centre, whereas I prefer the girl to be the centre of attention. From my experience, most POV sites are very poor quality.

7

It's been interesting reading the replies. I submitted this poll just to get an idea of what people thought. I think that for an 'old man, young chick' site to work, you need an old guy with some real spark and sense of mischief. Uncle Jessie falls into that category (see his DVDs, 'The Misadventures Of Uncle Jessie'. But I think if you don't get the right guy to be the 'old toad', the site could easilly flop (no pun intended!)

8

9

Depends what nationality their site is. If it's a European site, you might reasonably expect a typo every now and then.

But typos (or worse still, spelling errors which indicate they can't spell correctly) from English speaking countries ring real alarm bells for me. Spelling errors indicate that this lot are a bucnh of boofheads, and their site will reflect this.

10

11

ALL OF THE ABOVE!!!! Lousy navigation rates highest for me. Great content with lousy navigation goes down terrible. Moderate content with good navigation is far better.
Sites have to realise that good navigation is vital to making a site user friendly. Navigation should include search facilities by date, model name, genre (ie HC, lesbian, etc), and media (pics, vid). The better sites pay careful attention to this aspect.

Apart from all this, I would add that sites need to have a good 'feel' for erotica. Too many highly rated sites (including review sites) ignore the tasty nuances of porn - they seem to think that porn ends with HQ vids & pics. A HQ vid is useless if the scene itsaelf is poorly done.

12

TGP are things I stumble across by accident from time to time. They are usually a freaking waste of time, as when you click on one, it usually takes you to another TGP. Whoever thought up these things up should have been shot at birth!!!

14

I'd pay $35 or more if the site were worth it. But often, there is no correlation between a site's worth and it's price. That' why I think so many PUs won't pay more than $30. In fact, I've found most sites that charge $35 or more have severe limits, such as DRM. I suspect they charge high prices because they know people will be pissed off, and bugger off after month. They want to suck people in on the premise that "higher price = better quality".

The better sites are comfortable with $30, because they know that people will sign up and stay, (hence their money is assured.

16

17

It depends on the size of the site. I try to download the best stuff, but sometimes, it's hard to tell before DL. Usually, if a site has a way of doing things or a formula I really like, I try to DL most. Eg - the girls on Little Mutt are no more attractive than anywhere else. But Because I really like the way they do things, I tried to DL most of their stuff. Also consider the fact that some sites have heaps more content - you cannot DL the lot (or even most!). BUt I'd rather a HQ site with less stuff, that a site with truckloads of poorer quality stuff. On the really big sites, I try to get enough stuff to pay for my month's membership, and try to get the better stuff with a range of models, scenes, and styles.

18

Once when I updated IE, I found that this annoying bar remained at the top, like a bad smell, when I pressed F11. It cuts into the top of the pic download, and annoys the fuck out of me. And then I found I couldn't revert to the old one. Wne I complained to IE, they fobbed me off with some bullshit.

21

I see the purpose of trial memberships as a way of seeing what the site's got. But they have to give you a full taste. I have no problem with a limit - eg 3 FULL vids, 3 pics sets, but I think it is unfair of them to limit it to "only 3 pics". You are, after all, paying something.
I also think that with a trial membership they should reall make it clear what the limits are - spell out the rules, and people will acept them. Don't spell out the rules, and people acuse you of trickery. I don;t see how anyone can say thayt using a TM to skim off content is 'trashy' - afterall, the site makes that decision; they set up their own limits, and they have to live with it.

Protecting MinorsWe are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.