In 1984 California's Attorney General Warned that Judges Disciplined by the Toothless Confidentiality Terms of the CJP, would be likely to retaliate against those who lodge complaints. Thirty years later this is what retaliation looks like where bad family court judges have hijacked justice.

Santa Clara, CA- A father dealing with false claims of Domestic Violence tried to lodge a complaint against Judge Stuart Scott. Judge Scott retaliated and sent Santa Clara County Sheriffs to the man's Grandmother, in what could be seen as nothing short of retaliation and abuse of power.

The harassment has continued as Stuart Scott has used the Sheriffs to do welfare checks on the 88 year old grandma's home, where she resides with the father who tried to complain about Stuart Scott's unlawful and unethical conduct.

As captured in the video, Judge Scott was notified by his bailiff in his court of a possible complaint. Judge Scott responded by sending sheriffs to the home of a woman who has been a resident of Santa Clara County for over 50 years.

Los Gatos Police Taking Bribes for Judge Scott

Santa Clara County Sheriffs have a long history of assisting certain law firms, and judges, in retaliating against Whistleblowers. The history includes unsettling relationships with the Los Gatos police, the same agency that first sent the father to Judge Scott's courtroom.

As a 20-year prosecutor with the Santa Clara County DA's office, Stuart Scott is reported to have longstanding relationships with Santa Clara County law firms including Hoge Fenton, and McManis Faulkner, where billions of dollars have been diverted through Santa Clara County's probate and family law cases.

Scott also mastered false DV complaints and sent innocent people to jail, which was never addressed properly as a matter of public protection by the Sixth District Court of Appeal, or revealed in Santa Clara University's Innocence Project Report.

James Towery, Sinunu-Towery's husband, former Chief Trial Counsel at the State Bar, assured Scott, and other members of the DA's office, were not disciplined by either the Sixth District Court of Appeal, or the State Bar, in order to solidify Scott's ascension to the Santa Clara County bench.

Towery additionally used his connections at Santa Clara University to have Stuart Scott's name redacted from a report that should have resulted in Stuart Scott's disbarment.

Unphased by his public admonishment, the county's lead judges agreed to move Scott from criminal court to family court, where Scott continues to assist judges and lawyers launder money, accept kickbacks for requested orders, and harm innocent parents who appear before him. Scott has taken over cases once assigned to Mary Ann Grilli, a controversial judge who retired in early 2017.

Since taking over for Grilli, Scott has continued to assure large fees to select law firms, while picking on self- represented parties, or parties who fail to hire lawyers in Judge Scott's good grace. Scott also has reportedly engaged in misconduct with Grilli's former court clerk and court reporter.

Judge Lucas Hides Court Sex and Assault Complaints

Silicon Valley business moguls have hacked into email accounts that show Judge Scott is continuing to sexually harass court staff, which Judge Patricia Lucas has refused to report.

Judge Scott, has been reported to have carried on with over 20 women lawyers and judges in the county. One woman reported that Scott gave her a sexually transmitted disease and threatened her in order to keep the affair, and disease, a secret.

Scott has allegedly taken millions in kickbacks as a prosecutor and judge, in return he has assured Jeff Rosen's office continues to ignore evidence of criminal conduct and misuse of public funds.

Judge Scott has been a menace to the family court system, where he continues to sexually harass women , and has participated in money laundering schemes to benefit select law firms, the courts and himself.

This article makes the Commission on Judicial Performance look very good

I have been dealing with the Commission on Judicial Performance in regards to many Judges who committed crime and also violated the Law the Commission on Judicial Performancd are members of the organized crime protecting these types of Judges. They are dirty as hell.

Reply

SJ Mom

11/29/2017 08:03:25 am

I don't know why you seem to go in the opposite direction from what I am trying to accomplish. Even in Keandra Scott's case I was fighting Judges who have committed severe crimes as helping the rapist and murderer where you were going after celebrity cases for DV. Then now I am fighting the Commission on Judicial Performance for protecting Judges such as Aaron Persky Vincent Chiarello James Towery and Edward Mills there are more to my list. The commission is protecting all these Judges and you put out an article making the Commission on Judicial Performance look really good. What the hell ?

Reply

Linnea

1/20/2018 01:51:46 pm

This judge (Stuart Scott) is quite possibly the most ridiculously unfair & corrupt judge I have ever dealt with. I am working on filing to change judges & find a way to get every decision he’s made in my family court case reversed. He needs to be disbarred & removed from the bench.

Reply

Tony Rodriguez

5/9/2018 01:03:54 pm

I had no d.v. yet he put a restraining order against me with my daughter for having told her "Not to be rude." When the mother on the same paperwork submitted against me said the same. And she filed for the restraining order to avoid paying the child support she owed. In which in the paperwork submitted against me she clearly tells me that if I drop the child support, she'll leave the custody the same. I told this to Judge Scott, in which he asks the "mom" if its true. she denied it, and he disregarded everything. Ive signed up for visitation and the mother doesn't comply. Its been a year now since I've seen my daughter. And them has been alienating her the entire time. While I on the other hand have always spoken respectfully about the mother in my daughters presence. AND I can prove EVERYTHING!