The Development of Fifth-Grade Children's Problem-Posing Abilities

Abstract

This one-year study involved designing and implementing a problem-posing program for fifth-grade children. A framework developed for the study encompassed three main components: (a) children's recognition and utilisation of problem structures, (b) their perceptions of, and preferences for, different problem types, and (c) their development of diverse mathematical thinking. One of the aims of the study was to investigate the extent to which children's number sense and novel problem-solving skills govern their problem-posing abilities in routine and nonroutine situations. To this end, children who displayed different patterns of achievement in these two domains were selected to participate in the 10-week activity program. Problem-posing interviews with each child were conducted prior to, and after the program, with the progress of individual children tracked during the course of the program. Overall, the children who participated in the program appeared to show substantial developments in each of the program components, in contrast to those who did not participate.

REFERENCES

Bergeron, J. C. and Herscovics, N.: 1990, ‘Psychological aspects of learning early arithmetic’, in P. Nesher and J. Kilpatrick (eds.), Mathematics and Cognition: A Research Synthesis by the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 31–52.Google Scholar

English, L. D.: 1996, ‘Children's problem posing and problem-solving preferences’, in J. Mulligan and M. Mitchelmore (eds.), Research in Early Number Learning. Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.Google Scholar

English, L. D.: 1997, ‘Development of seventh-grade students' problem posing’. Paper submitted for the annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Finland, July.Google Scholar

English, L. D., Cudmore, and Tilley, D.: under review, ‘Problem posing and critiquing: How it can happen in your classroom.’ Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar

Fuson, K. C.: 1992, ‘Research on whole number addition and subtraction’, in D. A. Grouws (ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, New York; National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia, pp. 243–275.Google Scholar

Greer, B.: 1992, ‘Multiplication and division as models of situations’, in D. A. Grouws (ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, New York: Macmillan, New York; National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia, pp. 276–295.Google Scholar

Payne, J. N. and Huinker: 1993, ‘Early number and numeration’, in R. J. Jensen (ed.), Research Ideas for the Classroom: Early Childhood Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Research Interpretation Project, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, pp.43–71.Google Scholar

Santos, M.: 1995 (October), Students' Recognition of Structural Features in Mathematical Problem Solving Instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar

Silver, E. A. and Burkett, M. L.: 1993, The Posing of Division Problems by Preservice Elementary School Teachers. Unpublished manuscript, Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar

Silver, E. A. and Cai, J.: 1993, Mathematical Problem Posing and Problem Solving by Middle School Students, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar

Silver, E. A. and Mamona, J.: 1989, ‘Problem posing by middle school mathematics teachers’, in C. A. Maher, G. A. Goldin, and R. B. Davis (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, New Brunswick, New Jersey, pp. 263–269.Google Scholar

Sowder, J. T.: 1988, ‘Mental computation and number comparison: Their roles in the development of number sense and computational estimation’, in J. Hiebert, and M. Behr (eds.), Number Concepts and Operations in the Middle Grades (vol.2), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey; National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia, pp. 182–197.Google Scholar

Stern, E.: 1995, August, Longitudinal Consequences of Early Understanding of Quantitative Comparison, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction.Google Scholar