The Granma Moses of Radical Writing
An Interview with William Blumby Mickey Z.
www.dissidentvoice.org
November 22, 2004

I’m
often asked to suggest books for radical reading purposes. “I wanna know
what’s really going on,” it typically goes, “but where do I start?” My
standard recommendation for your run-of-the-mill, garden variety,
weaned-on-Fox American begins with a list of two: “A People’s History of the
United States,” by Howard Zinn and
Killing Hope, by
William Blum. Zinn, for many, is no surprise. Blum, however, is less
renowned but no less notorious...or essential. He may not have been name
dropped in a Matt-and-Ben flick, but his work is required reading for anyone
who craves context and documented data on the realities of U.S. foreign
policy.

“If I were president, I
could stop terrorist attacks against the United states in a few days.
Permanently. I would first apologize—very publicly and very sincerely—to all
the widows and orphans, the impoverished ad tortured, and all the many
millions of other victims of American imperialism. Then I would announce to
every corner of the world that America’s global military interventions have
come to an end. I would then inform Israel that it is no longer the 51st
state of the union but-oddly enough-a foreign country. Then I would reduce
the military budget by at least 90% and use the savings to pay reparations
to the victims and repair the damage from the many American bombings,
invasions, and sanctions. There would be more than enough money. One year’s
military budget in the United States is equal to more than $20,000 per hour
for every hour since Jesus Christ was born. That’s one year. That’s what I’d
do on my first three days in the White House. On the fourth day, I’d be
assassinated.”

I’ve been fortunate enough
to correspond with Bill Blum for the past few years, speak at events with
him, and experience his kind spirit, razor sharp intellect, and clever sense
of humor. Recently, we engaged in this bit of e-mail exchange:

MZ:
On the jacket of your latest book, you say: “The United States runs the
world like the Taliban ran Afghanistan.” How would you concisely explain
what you mean by this to someone mired in mainstream American culture?

WB:
If they have a halfway decent knowledge of how the Taliban ran Afghanistan,
then the examples I give in the same statement would be my explanation. If
they have no knowledge to speak of about the Taliban (which would apply to
millions of Americans, I’m sure), then it’s sort of hopeless. It’s not easy
to undo a lifetime of conditioning with a few sentences. How can I match
10000 hours of Rush Limbaugh, Fox News, and The National Enquirer? In the
current edition of my newsletter, The Anti-Empire Report, coming out soon, I
write about such people, whom I call the Valueites. There is now thought
amongst progressives about reaching such people, trying to win large numbers
of them over. This is certainly an understandable goal, but I suggest that
we not waste our time, energy, and resources. Certainly, with any one
individual amongst them, if we secluded that person on a farm with a dozen
articulate progressive activists for a year, and with a plethora of moving
audio-visual materials, something would probably click in that individual’s
head. But we haven’t got enough activists, time, or farms to make even a
crease in the target population of “Valueites”. As ignorant and lacking in
imagination as they might be, these people, if transported to Iraq to see
the bombs falling, the houses destroyed, the missing limbs, and the mangled
children’s bodies; if forced to look upon and smell the burning flesh of
victims of policies they support—even such Americans would be moved to a
higher political consciousness. This has already happened with a number of
American military personnel in Iraq, but is of course impossible to arrange
for the many Valueites.

MZ:
If trying to reach the Valueites is “a waste of our time, energy, and
resources,” what avenues would you suggest for the 21st century dissident?

WB:
I wasn’t commenting about the methods, only the target of our methods. We
have in fact reached huge numbers of people who would otherwise not have
become informed dissenters. And there’s an unlimited number of more of such
people out there just waiting for “enlightenment” or waiting to learn that
they’re not alone in their thinking. We have to keep doing what we’ve been
doing. The fact that we didn’t stop the war doesn’t mean that we haven’t
been successful in recruiting. And we have to assume that this will pay off
in ways that can’t be entirely foreseen, when our numbers reach a critical
mass.

MZ:
What role do you see your work playing in the effort to create a more just
society?

WB:
Only in education, per the above. I’m not about to lead a charge into the
Pentagon, so I’ll stick to writing and speaking. I think because I was a
“believer” for almost the first half of my life I understand what confusions
and what questions are in the minds of those who are not yet with us, and so
I’m able to address those concerns without even being asked.

MZ:
But, do you ever feel like we just don’t have enough time to reach the
number of people it would take to achieve the critical mass you mention? How
can one blend patience and urgency?

WB:
What is the alternative? Immediate armed revolution? I don’t know what else
to do.

MZ:
I’ll assume one alternative you don’t agree with is supporting candidates
from the Democratic Party. Were you surprised so many high profile lefties
supported the Anybody-But Bush agenda in 2004?

WB:
I was surprised, but I wouldn’t say they supported any agenda other than
defeating Bush. But it was not a principled support; in their statement they
could not, and did not, say a word in support of Kerry.

MZ:
And how do you feel about the public anointing of George W. Bush as the
“worst president ever”?

WB:
As I discuss in the introduction to my new book, there’s virtually nothing
bad done by the Bush administration that has not been done repeatedly by
previous administrations. I think Bush’s very limited appeal as a person
has produced a good portion of the hatred of him. Clinton, as one example,
could get away with his disgusting policies easier than Bush can because
Clinton could at times come on as educated, articulate, and “charming”.

MZ:
I’m glad you mentioned your new book. In your humble opinion, why should
someone buy this “Freeing the World to Death”?

WB:
One reason is that I would like the money. Another is that it’s a good read
for anyone interested in world affairs, US foreign policy, history, the Cold
War, PanAm 103, Cuba, terrorism, the War on Terrorism, socialism, and lots
more; all written in a readable manner, with even some laughs.

MZ:
What advice would you offer someone just starting out as an activist/writer?

WB:
The advice I give to any kind of writer is simply to write, write, write. If
you put it off you’re doomed. When you read other people, don’t just read
for entertainment and information, study the style. If it’s something you
like, read it again to figure out what it is you like; same for something
you don’t like. Don’t give your writing to a dozen people for their
commentary; the contradictory opinions will drive you crazy and can make you
feel confused and insecure. Give it to only two or three people whose
opinions you respect. Don’t worry about any “rules of writing”. Be
unorthodox if it fits your subject and point of view; don’t be afraid to
gamble with style; you’ll learn from your errors. If you want to use your
writing as a tool of activism be prepared to not be rich. I’ve been lucky
enough to make a halfway decent living out of my writing and speaking, but
it took me a long time to reach that point; so keep your day job for awhile.
Books are a much better way to make money than journalism.

MZ:
What’s it like being an elder statesman of dissent?

WB:
I have no such feeling about myself. If I have any prominence in the world
of dissent, it’s only been reached in the past few years. So I can’t begin
to feel like Chomsky, Zinn, Parenti, or many others. That’s not false
modesty speaking. But I can say that I am surprised by any indication of any
prominence, including your question. I did not have my first book published
until I was 53. So maybe I’m the Granma Moses of radical writing.