Essential Reading

A Short History of the New World Order Part II By cyberpatriot@hotmail.com Aug. 10, 1973 – David Rockefeller writes an article for the “New York Times” describing his recent visit to Red China: “Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also […]

Our web hosts were threatened with legal action after lawyers representing none other than Dov Zakheim himself claimed this article was “defamatory.” Due to an oversight the article was not fully removed so read it before Zakheim gets us shut down

Google removed this video but a reader sent in a copy. Watch how the media carefully manipulates coverage of the events of 9/11, as they interview ‘experts’ who provide the cover story that has gone to make up the standard govt/media version of 9/11

“[T]here was just an explosion [in the south tower]. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.”- Firefighter Richard Banaciski

(Note, although the following cannot be officially verified it appears to accurately reflect events as reported by a number of sources.)

Transcript of Meeting Between Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie. -July 25,1990 (eight days before the August 2,1990 Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait). July 25, 1990 – Presidential Palace – Baghdad

U.S. Ambassador Glaspie – “I have direct instructions from President Bush to improve our relations with Iraq. We have considerable sympathy for your quest for higher oil prices, the immediate cause of your confrontation with Kuwait (pause). As you know, I lived here for years and admire your extraordinary efforts to rebuild your country. We know you need funds. We understand that, and our opinion is that you should have the opportunity to rebuild your country (pause). We can see that you have deployed massive numbers of troops in the south. Normally that would be none of our business, but when this happens in the context of your threats against Kuwait, then it would be reasonable for us to be concerned. For this reason, I have received an instruction to ask you, in the spirit of friendship – not confrontation – regarding your intentions: Why are your troops massed so very close to Kuwait’s borders?”

Saddam Hussein – “As you know, for years now I have made every effort to reach a settlement on our dispute with Kuwait. There is to be a meeting in two days; I am prepared to give negotiations only this one brief chance. (Pause) When we (the Iraqis) meet (with the Kuwaitis) and we see there is hope, then nothing will happen. But if we are unable to find a solution, then it will be natural that Iraq will not accept death.”

U.S. Ambassador Glaspie – “What solutions would be acceptable?”

Saddam Hussein – “If we could keep the whole of the Shatt al Arab – our strategic goal in our war with Iran – we will make concessions (to the Kuwaitis). But, if we are forced to choose between keeping half of the Shatt and the whole of Iraq (which in Saddam’s view, includes Kuwait) then we will give up the whole of the Shatt to defend our claims on Kuwait to keep the whole of Iraq in the shape we wish it to be. (Pause) What is the United States opinion on this?”

U.S. Ambassador Glaspie – “We have no opinion on your Arab – Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait. Secretary (of State, James) Baker has directed me to emphasize the instruction, first given to Iraq in the 1960′s, that the Kuwait issue is not associated with America.” (Hussein smiles)

As if to underline America’s apparent indifference to Iraq’s dispute with Kuwait, Ambassador Glaspie left Iraq a few days later for a ‘holiday’. A few days’ later Iraqi troops invaded Kuwait and the rest, as they say, is history.

Baghdad, September 2, 1990, U.S. Embassy.

One month later British journalists obtain a transcript of the Saddam/Glaspie meeting of July 25,1990. They confront her as she leaves the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.

Journalist 2 – “You knew Saddam was going to invade (Kuwait) but you didn’t warn him not to. You didn’t tell him America would defend Kuwait. You told him the opposite – that America was not associated with Kuwait.”

Journalist 1 – “You encouraged his aggression – his invasion. What were you thinking?”

Ambassador Glaspie – “Obviously, I didn’t think, and nobody else did, that the Iraqis were going to take all of Kuwait.”

Journalist 1 – “You thought he was just going to take some of it? But, how could you? Saddam told you that, if negotiations failed, he would give up his Iran (Shatt al Arab waterway) goal for the whole of Iraq, in the shape we wish it to be. You know that includes Kuwait, which the Iraqis have always viewed as an historic part of their country!”

Journalist 1 – “America green lighted the invasion. At a minimum, you admit signalling Saddam that some aggression was okay – that the U.S. would not oppose a grab of the al-Rumeilah oil field, the disputed border strip and the Gulf islands – territories claimed by Iraq?” (Ambassador Glaspie says nothing as the limousine door closed behind her and the car drives off.)From the Free Republic forum: http://24.142.63.193/forum/a3862ee83626f.html

Interviewed in 2009, the man who went on to become ‘Jihadi John’ condemned 9/11 and 7/7 as “wrong”. However the fact that he didn’t mention false flags suggests he’s either a dupe, a dummy or a double agent