Magnetic Hole. Pictures.

Magnetic hole is a plane/flat analog of the black hole. The black hole is bounded
by gravitational forces, and magnetic hole is bounded by magnetic forces, which
are dozens of powers stronger than gravity forces.

It is probable that the microscopic magnetic holes can be created at the collider.
Magnetic holes will grow capturing the normal substance. As a result, magnetic holes
can destroy the Earth. The Solar System can be transformed in the ring structure,
analogues to the ring structure of exploded star SN 1987A.

The black hole are usually drown in the form of a funnel.

That is an approximation. The funnel does not directed everywhere: no to the
right, no to the left, no forward, no back... From the point of view of the distant
observer, standing a the point A, the time-rate, visible on the watches,
placed at points B, C, D, F, E, ..., goes the more slowly, the nearer this
point is situated to the event horizon, denoted by the letter G. The distances
between every neighbor points of these set are equal, but the visible density of
points are growing at our schematic figure. If the observer would drop a stone into
the black hole, the stone will never achieve the event horizon. Because the distance
from A to G, from the point of view of the observer A is infinite.
Or we can say, that the time-rate stops at the event horizon.

If at the center of your room there is a black hole, then the distance from any
point of the room to the event horizon of the black hole will be infinite. That
can be shown as in the bottom figure.

Radial distances between every neighbor blue circumferences at the figure are
equal, but on the figure we can see these distances unequal. And just near the black
hole's horizon the circumferences form one continuous blue ring.

The black hole itself is depicted on the figure by the black circle. There is
no space inside the black hole, relatively the external observer, - the black hole
is behind the event horizon.

If an apple of mass m would begin to drop into a black hole, it will become smaller
and smaller. Gravity influence of an apple itself on observer will be diminishing,
but the gravity influence of a funnel will grow correspondingly. We can say, that
mass of an apple transforms into another form of matter, into a space-time of a
growing gravity hole.

Microscopic black hole, which can be made on Large Hadron Collider can have extremely
small radius, smaller than 10-51 m. That is 1035 times smaller
than Compton radius of proton. But the mass of such microscopic black hole (mBH)
can be greater by several thousands times. It is clear, that such mBH can not swallow
the whole proton at once, if we will not assume the hypothesis of quantum capture.
From the other hand, we know that proton consists from tree quarks. We can assume,
that mBH can try to swallow the quark. It is known that the quark can not exist
alone. Consequently, at the time of capture, the thread, connecting the quark and
the rest of proton, will broke, and at that place, the pair of quark-antiquark will
appear. As a result mBH will swallow the quark-antiquark meson; and the proton can
be transformed into a strange matter, if the pair was strange. This idea is also
quite hypothetic.

Magnetic holes are much more real and much more dangerous. But at first, let's
recollect, what is the physical vacuum? It is known, that a variety of virtual particles
and antiparticles are constantly appearing and disappearing in the physical vacuum.
These particles are named virtual because of a very short time of their lives. The
span of their life-time is limited by the quantum uncertainty principle.

You can see at this figure the "virtual chain" of transformations. The events
go from the left side to the right. Virtual photon,
γ, transforms into a virtual electron-positron pair, e-e+,
which after painting a circumference, transforms into virtual photon again. Virtual
pair e-e+ creates a magnetic field B, with the
configuration, analogues to the field of bar-magnet. Such elemental magnetic dipoles
are created spontaneously everywhere and always. Because of their chaotic orientation,
the average total magnetic field in the vacuum is equal to zero.

In this article we assumed, that the magnetic hole can be imagined as a set of
microscopic circular currents, created by the real charged particles. The magnetic
dipole can be observed from its North Pole (blue), or from its South Pole (red),
or under some angle.

In a space with zero magnetic field, the density of red circles are equal to
the density of blue circles. If the density of some circles is greater than other,
then in such place we have non-zero magnetic field. If in some place we see only
one type of circles, then in this place we have the maximum possible magnetic field.

At this figure you can see the microscopic magnetic hole.

On the next figure we ca see, how the magnetic hole captures nucleon's restlets.
We assumed, that at the time of the capture, the proton ejects the positron and
becomes the nucleon's restlet, boson. The same boson is appear at the time of neutron
capture, which accompanied by the ejection the antineutrino. The restlets are quanta
of force magnetic field, or frozen force lines of the magnetic hole.

Why "frozen"? The dropping of bosons also lasts infinitely long, from the point
of view of distant observer, as it was in the case of the black hole. Boson becomes
nearer and nearer to the plane of the hole, and makes it wider, constantly increasing
its radius.

At the next figure, this idea of the eternally dropping bosons is repeated in
the form of the change of the spatial scales, relatively distant observer, looking
at the microscopic magnetic dipole, falling at the hole. The scales do not change
along the axis x and y. But the z-scales reminds us the behavior of the black hole
at the fig. 1. The limiting point G can be situated anywhere in the plane
of a blue circle. This circle plays the same role as the sphere of Schwarzschild
in the black hole.

If the mass of growing magnetic hole becomes quite big, then the gravity funnel
of magnetic hole becomes more essential, and the x- and y-scales are also change.

Hypothesis.

Gravitational field of the magnetic hole is anisotropic. Let magnetic field is
oriented along the z-axis, then the gravity field will be directed along the plane
xOy. This can explain, why the majority of galaxies are flattered, and why the peripheral
stars of galaxies have abnormally high velocities. On the next figure we can see
the approximate directional diagram of the gravitational (black) and magnetic (blue/red)
fields of the magnetic hole.

Anisotropic gravitational field diminishes more slowly with distance as it was
in the case of spherical symmetry. It is very probable, that in the centers of many
galaxies there are huge magnetic holes. Such huge hole forms the flattered structure
of the galaxy, and can eject electrically charged relativistic particles along the
hole's axis. The last is possible if the hole is surrounded by the ordinary matter,
accreting at hole.

The next two figures are related to the neutron drop/liquid
and to the neutron hole.

If the distribution of electrical charge in particles is not homogeneous,
then the particles can form the systems, connected by the electrical forces.

The total magnetic field of this substance is equal to zero. As
a result, this system does not create the sufficiently strong attractive force in
order to capture a new particle.

It is supposed, that under the influence of external magnetic field,
or under the influence of starting strong internal magnetic field, the particles,
or Cooper pairs of particles, behave like a particles in a ferromagnetic. Particles
attract each other in the plane of the bottom figure by the electrical forces; and
in a perpendicular direction - by the magnetic forces.

The more particles in a system - the more attractive force along
the magnetic axis. The growth of the system is possible, if the growth along the
magnetic axis is more preferable energetically, comparatively to the growth in the
perpendicular plane. It is possible to test this hypothesis at the Large Hadron
Collider, with successive explosion of the Earth.

From the correspondence on the forum
http://www.lhcportal.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=116&start=135

Somebody wrote: No, what Ivan is afraid of is some
form of magnetic anomaly analogous to a black hole: An anomaly where the magnetic
field applied to a dipole exceeds a specified value and (presumably) results
in the collapse of the dipole. Apparently this thing then eats protons.

Yes. In the ordinary vacuum different virtual particles constantly appear and
disappear. In the bottom figure we can see the appearance of electro-positron pair
in the point A and their annihilation in the point B.

In order to transform virtual pair into real pair we must spent energy. On the
next figure we can see the x-boson, consisting from two fermions, particle and antiparticle.

If the energy of p-p collision at collider is sufficient we can create an exited
region in vacuum containing some quantity of such x-bosons. They are oriented in
the same direction and have the superconductive and ferromagnetic properties.

If proton enters into the field of such exited vacuum it can
be ruined onto x-boson and positron. X-boson will be captured by magnetic hole and
the hole will become bigger per one x-boson. Positron will fly away and annihilate
there with some electron. The rate of matter destruction will be growing. The Earth
will undergo the collaptical explosion in a period from 1000 seconds to 1000 days.

Somebody wrote: Proton collides with X-boson, positron, electron.

No! Collision is a vague term. All protons from one bunch constantly interact with
all protons of another bunch by exchange with virtual photons and by some other
virtual particles. Most of such collisions are elastic and lead only to change of
direction of a particle.

Proton-proton collision, which leads to creation of stable
excitation of physical vacuum, can look like this inelastic collision.

Created magnetic hole captures protons; destroy them onto positron and x-boson
(or onto μ+ and x-boson, or onto p+
and x-boson); ejects positron (or μ+, or p+)
and captures x-boson and grow. Note: x-boson does not consist from two up-quarks,
but is rather a leptoquark in Kalusa-Klein space.

There is no completely formed black holes.

The mass of an object, from observer's point of view, corresponds to the curvature
of space-time at the place, where the observer seats. The thing, dropped by observer
into the black hole, will be falling in it infinitely long. From observer's point
of view, the thing will never cross the surface of the black hole. All things, dropped
in the hole earlier, will never cross its surface. That means that there is no any
surface of a black hole.

The further the falling thing from the observer is, the smaller its gravity influence
of the thing onto observer. The "effective mass" of all falling things becomes smaller.
That leads to diminishing of space-time curvature, if the number of falling things
remains the same. In order to make the curvature the same, the observer must throw
into the gravity pit the new and new things.

Gravity collapse without the black hole creation is possible.

If the observer will not drop new things into the gravity pit, then the diminishing
of "effective mass" of every thing, falling in the pit, will lead to diminishing
of the total mass of the object, undergoing the gravity collapse.

The phenomenon of "effective mass diminishing" is also valid for the "nuclear
quasi-holes". "Effective masses" of nucleons becomes smaller under fusion of light
nuclei into bigger nuclei, if bigger nuclei are smaller then the iron nuclei. In
order to follow analogies, the nuclear fusion can be renamed here into a "nuclear
collapse". It is known that nuclear collapse is accompanied by the gamma radiation.
The energy of emitted radiation corresponds to a binding energy of created nucleus.
Gravitational collapse gives the similar scenario. The things, dropping into the
gravity pit, are accelerated. The rate of their collisions becomes higher. The temperature
becomes bigger. The quantity of emitted photons and their energy becomes bigger.

At the time of collapse the gravity pit becomes thinner and dipper.

The space-time under the observer are straightens, consequently, the mass of
a matter, undergoing the collapse, disappears. Its disappearance is accompanied
by energy pumping into a growing photonic sphere, which is widespreading outside
the observer.

Is there an opposite part of the Universe, Im, and does the naked barionic
and leptonic numbers ejected there, we do not know.

Conclusion. There is no gravity black holes. Gravitational collapse is
possible. Gravitational collapse can be the second phase of magnetic collapse. Magnetic
collapse can be started at collider.

“Hawking radiation” forbids black holes.

Bell paradox. If two rockets, connected by a string, are
accelerated with equal acceleration, then the string would be torn. Or accelerations
of rockets must be different.

The second part of Hawking formula describes the temperature of
a black hole of mass M.
The first part of “Hawking formula” can easily be received from the second part,
using Newton mechanics.
Unruh formula and the first part of Hawking formula describe the temperature of
a vacuum, surrounding a particle, which is accelerated relatively vacuum with acceleration
aUnruh or gHawking.

This accelerating particle has a mass m and its Compton wavelength
λc or radius Rc, which are connected
by equation:mc2 = hc / λc
= ħc / Rc.

Using this formula, we can change the Unruh/Hawking formulae:

T = maRc / 2pk;
T = mgRc / 2pk.

These formulae give Unruh/Hawking temperatures at the depth R,
which is equal equal to Compton radius of a particle Rc. On the
bottom figure we expanded the validity of these formulae for any depth R.
Besides, we transformed the formulae from exact form to approximate form, because
the substance can consist from particles with different masses and because the substances
can be at different states (gas, solid, liquid, the mixture of molecular and photonic
parts...).

Left side. Unruh. A rod, accelerating relatively vacuum with acceleration
a. Unruh temperature is in the depth R, which is equal to Compton
radius of a particle, Rparticle.

Right side. Hawking. Earth crust with a rod in it, accelerating
relatively vacuum with acceleration g; that is the same as if the vacuum
accelerates relatively you into opposite direction! Hawking temperature is in point
R=Rparticle. If a or g are constant, then T
≈ maR/k or T
≈ mgR/k.

If acceleration depends from the depth R, then we must rewrite
this formula in differential form:

dT/dR ≈ mg / k.

Increment of depth dR can be substituted by increment of
radius dr with opposite sign.

dT/dr ≈ -mg / k.

This is a formula of gravitational temperature gradient. This gradient
does not lead to heat exchange between layers. This idea is very old. AFAIK, the
first person, who discussed it, was a famous physicist Loschmidt. But it was forgotten
not only because the formula dT/dr = 0 is simpler, but also because the formula
dT/dr ≈ -mg / k ruins the notions,
which were supported by religious clerics: "thermal death of Universe", "cemetery
of extinct stars", "Big Bang Dogma".

From the other hand, if you substitute the values into the formula
dT/dr ≈ -mg / k, you will receive
the experimental value of temperature gradient in Earth, which is about 10-30 Kelvin
per kilometer. That is an experimental facts, but Big Bang murders rather explode
the Earth and kill all of us, than recognize the experimental facts.

The formula dT/dr ≈
-mg/k is valid for any state of substance with the precision to numerical coefficient
about 1. This formula is valid for planets and stars. This formula is valid for
usual acceleration a, for gravitational acceleration g=GM/R2,
for centrifugal acceleration a=v2/r. It explains old puzzles,
such as Ranke effect, but it is not accepted by physicists, because it ruins also
the most fundamental religion, the Big Bang Dogma.

So, development of Unruh/Hawking formula shows us that there is
no any “black hole evaporation” but there are Eternal sources of energy in the Ever
Young Universe.

This figure explains why the temperature of gas in the left chamber
is greater then in the right chamber.

In fact that was only a small part of a story.

About 1998 I had received a formula of stellar
energy sources. According to my formula the energy output of a star is proportional
to M4/R5. Couple of years ago I understand that my formula
is analogues to Hawking formula, which lead to analogues proportionality: M4/R6.
You can see that proportionality are not the same. The cause: Hawking formula connected
with the surface temperature; my formula is connected with the distribution of matter
along the radius of a star.
Mass proportionalities are the same and almost coincides with observational value:
L~M3.9.